The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFIELD DENSITY TEST``l a-7 7� �'�rFtHiB �19 Pa1N hoWne.f: 9d5- 4 784294m1 ederal E-Fax:954-784-7875 CANN gineer esting, -Inc. n Fwim�� A Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 54, Creekside Date: January 15, 2019 Address 8720 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL Order #: 19DR045 Area Te,.ted: Building Pad`"' Permit Material ype: Dark Gray Sand Tech: BK Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. Address: 1430 Culver Drive -NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 Test # . TEST LOCATION Probe Depth Elev. Moist ° /0 Dry Density PCF Proctor Value PCF Optimum Moisture Compaction Pass 1 Ceq er of Building Pad 12" FL 6.1 100.3 103.5 14.0 'A 96.9% ' Yes 2 NW (Corner of Building Pad. 12" FL 1.6.9 101.7 103.5 14.0 98.3% Yes 3 ISE Ii orner of Building Pad 12" FL 6.4 101.0 103.5 14.0 97.6% Yes 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remarks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Tesf only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verification of Soil Bearirg Capacity. Legend for E 6vation: PR = Proofro 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: zey_4� SL = Springlu a FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, i E. SG = Subgra a BG = Below Grade Federal Engfr16 ririg & Testirit', Inca /" /cf BC = Baseco rse BOF /Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. No. 59394 ' TOP = Top o Pipe FG yFinished Grade Certificate ofiAuthorizatnn #5471 As a mutual prot ction to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and authorization for publication of v_ _,iantants, conclusions or a acts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the degreenf coinpac&;rl_o ftha tested Iaye\,of material only. A density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the underlying soil materials.b.66iWAe proposed'structuri ; ThE results suit do not preclude o (guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required to certify that the underlying•�oilr NilISugpert the prbpo Ed structure without settlemen If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be performed to evaluatP,thi s�ita6ility of the underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be performed on this work: ' PAGE 1 of 2 - .•. .o, _ , �. I III Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way -shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed -by the client '"p'nor to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of.the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. I Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an, environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is_ for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions onl,other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and re -tested prior to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of,clients and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending written approval. I' It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 "__ RECEIVE® ederal JAN 2 2 4.019 -DPV - - FILExin-: �en :tom g�neer�ngg ST. Lucie County, Permittin w.ww.fed•eng.com ®Q Lasting, Inc.. Oakland Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 54, Creekside . Date: January 15, 2019 Addressf 8720 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL _ Order #: 1.9DR045 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit, #: 1 y _ 0776 Materia Type: Dark Gray Sand Tech: BK Client. D.R. Horton, Inc. Addres : 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction:Req.: 95% Doim R-m., GI Q,3om Prhrtnr 'Mathnd: ASTM D-1557 Test # TEST LOCATION' Probe. Depth Elev. Moist % Dry Density PCF Proctor .:Optimum Value PCF Moisture % Compaction Pass 1 Cc inter of Building ' Pad 12" FL . 6.1 100.3' 103.5 14.0 96.9% Yes- 2 N Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 6.9 101.7 103.5 14.0 98.3% Yes 3 SE; Corner of BuildingPad 12" FL 6.4 101.0 103.5 14.0 97.6% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Remar S: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2 for Additional Information for Disclalmer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a -verification of Soil i Legend for Elevation: PR = Pro olfroll 1,2,3 =1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: ( ' SL = Spr ngline FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, P 4 SG _ Su igrade BG = Below Grade Federal Engineorg 8 Tegg?g c �6 BC - Ba ecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. No. @4 Cip ; TOP = T 1p of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of Author' ,iRe As a mutu 1 protection to clients, the public and ourselves; all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and authoriza� r n' ��nts, conclusion ore xtracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval: A density test determines the degree of compactio t�i�t8� qli atedal only. A den ity does not replete a -soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do.not certify the:undedying soil materials below the proposed a oteiv `ihe results do not preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required to certify that the underlying soils will support the proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be. performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to supp rt the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days.or after heavy rainstorms, retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2