The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutFIELD DENSITY TEST6 Q ederal rl � �� 9 Des ®�?OMB _ Phone: 954 784-2941 E-Fax: 954 784 7875 WANNED � admin@fed-engcom gineering BY www.fed-eng.com ® esting, Inc. sty �P Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Project: Proposed Residence Lot 53, Creekside Date: February 22, 201919DR193 AddressI� 8724 Cobblestone Drive, Building Pad Fort Pierce, FL Order #: Permit #: Ad %^ d 71� Area Tested: Material] Type: Pale Gray Sand Tech: BK Client: D.R. Horton, Inc. 95% Addres �: 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 rau n va , Proctor Value PCF Optimum Moisture % Compaction Pass Test # TEST LOCATION Probe Depth Elev. Moist % Dry Density PCF C�llnter of Building Pad NE I Corner of Bui I Iding Pad SI, Corner of Building Pad 12" 12", 12" FL FL FL 6.1 7.3 7.9 101.7 100.9 100.6 104.8 104.8 104.8 12.0 .12.0 12.0. 97.0% 96.3% 96.0% ' Yes Yes Yes 1 2 3 4 5 6 ... 7 9 10 I 11 12 13 I I 14 Rem ks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer I� This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verification of Soil Beari g. Capacity. Legen' for Elevation: PR = oofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: SL = S I ringline FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, P.E. Federal Engineering & Testinc,�, inc.: •i�7 = Iu DC�rClutl OV - Vcwrr v�uuv � ,- - BC = asecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. Ivo.,59394 r TOP �op of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of Authorization #54i1 As a m al protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and auth"ocization far. publication,of st2tern6hts, conclusi ins or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the degree of cpmpactlon of tli� fester7.layer ar=rrlateria' only. A , ensity does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the underlying soil materials below tree proposed sVuoh��ES The results do not p pclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required to certify that the underlying sok,wiil sa�pj.)n-tnE,proposetl structure without i!rttlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be performed to evaluate uJse suit ilif� oflthe underlying soil to st ipport the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be performed on this work. e PAGE 1 of 2 i Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the -top 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of,the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying' soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excava overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and re -tested to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted are the confidential property of cli el and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is resen pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2 ederal gineering eating, Inc. /� �R7 /7. � RECEIVED FEB 2 5 2018 FIL.EE.C PhPermittin pe artment78759 P�eng.com St. Lucie County adman@fed www.fed•ong.com Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D:-6938 Proposed Residence Lot 53,,Creekside Date: February 22,.2019 8724 Cobblestone.Drive, Fort.Pierce, FL Order #: 19DR193 d: Buildin Pad Permit #:... '� pe: Pale Gray Sand: Tech: BK _r D.R. Horton, Inc. 1430:Culver Drive NE B FL 32907 Compaction Req.: 95% Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 r-cill11 ay, Proctor Value PCF -Optimum Moisture % Compaction Pass Test # TEST LOCATION Probe: Depth: p Elev. Moist % Dry ' Density PCF 1 10e,'ln��ter of Building Pad .12" FL, = 6.1 101.7 104.8 1.2.0 97.00/6 :: Yes 2 1 NEI Corner of Building Pad 12" FL - _ 7.3 1 100.9 1048t 12:0 96.3% Yes 3 IS Corner of Building Pad 12" F.L 7.9 100:6 104.8::: 12.0 .. 96.0% Yes . 4 � 5 6 7 it 8 9 I 10 11 i � 12 13 i 14 Rama' kc• sap RAvprsp side IPaoe 2 of 21 for. Additional Information for Disclaimer .��`_� ,•�;. �7. ; �i �: - This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and Is not a verification of S dg apacl "-x Legent or Elevation: '' N0. PR = P oofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd; 3rd Lift Submitted by:, ` SL = S , ringline FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, P:. ^U STATE 2 t ;� SG = „iibgrade BG = Below Grade Federal Engineeri'r psting; Inc 4; Z BC = ',asecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing. Florida Reg. No. 5d5s'�;r<ORIp;%�� NN°' TOP iI op of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of Authorizat)§{7' �t0` Asa m dual protection to clients; the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and aulhorizellort fb pl ill�i"r *@moms, conclusins or extracts from orregerding our reports is reserved pending our written approval.A density test determines the degree of compaction of f Mi✓� of material only. A ensity does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do' not certlry the underlying soil materials below the proposed structure. The results do not p -' elude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required to.certify that the underlying soils will support the proposed structure without ettlement, If, no soil borings - have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to s pport the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90'days or after heavy rainstorms, retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1: of 2