Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutFIELD DENSITY TESTBy _< < .era r& TESTING INC. 250 131h Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 OCT 05 2018 Permitting Uepartment Phone 954-784-2941 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 www.fed-eng.com Field Density Tes s o cte b� s�M rho D-6938 Pro�ect: Proposed Residence Lot 2, Creekside Date: September 28, 20.18 Ad ress: 8323 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL Order #: . 18DR859 Are Tested: Building Pad Permit #: . I ivicit -1 tdt 1 ypu. rdiu oruwll Sand with I races oT onen i ecn: or< Cliel t. D.R. Horton, Inc. Adc 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Less: Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557 TEST LOCATION Probe Moist Dry Proctor Optimum Eley. Density Value Moisture Compaction Pass Tes # Depth % p PCF PCF % 1 Center of Building Pad 12" FL 6.9 105.8 107.0 14.0 98.9% Yes 2 1 NW Corner of"Buildin Pad 1.2" FL 11.4 105.0 107.0 14.0 98.1 % Yes 3 ISE Comer of Building Pad 12" FL 8.3 106.9 107.0 14.0 99.9% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 1.3 14 Remic, rks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verification of Soil Bea indacl for Elevation:°�t C . Legen PR = oofroll 1,2,3 =1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by:' /� ; SL = S ringline FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, P.E...;3 g 1 ' ST TE ©F/� SG =11 bgrade BG = Below Grade Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. BC = E isecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. No. 59394, ,4ORiO, ��',•' TOP = �op of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of Authorizations q7(r,,�� . •' As a m al protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and authorization, b�10dn'of, statements, conclusi s or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines the degree of compaction of erte§tad Pajrer of material only. A d nsity does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the underlying soil materials below the proposed structure. The results do notpr dude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test Is required to certify that the underlying soils will support the proposed structure without s tilement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to su port the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storrns, retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2 rd it Phone 954-784-2941 1919 ederal 954-784-7875 Fax 954-784-7875 & TESTING INC. www.fed-eng.com 260 SW 31h Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Proj 1,1�t: Proposed Residence Lot 2, Creekside Date: September 28, 2018 Addr ss: 8323 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce_, FL Order #: 18DR859 Area Tested: Building Pad Permit #: !28""f}FJ' 3 Mate ial Type: Pale Brown Sand with Traces of Shell Tech: BK D.R. Horton, Inc. 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: Palm Bay. FL 32907 Proctor Method: 95% ASTM D-1557 Test # III ' TEST LOCATION Probe Depth Elev. Moist �� Dry Density PCF Proctor Value PCF Optimum Moisture % Compaction Pass 1 nter of Buildin Pad 12" FL 6.9 105.8 107.0 14.0 98.9% Yes 2 W Corner of 'Building Pad 12" FL 11.4 105.0 107.0 1 14.0 98.1% Yes 3 E Comer of Building Pad 12" FL 8.3 106.9 107.0 14.0 99.9% Yes 4 5 6 7 II8 9 10 l 11 12 tAT14APP 13 OVAL 14 Rema jks: See Reverse Side Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer I,� ,'N r--- .'%V `1 This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verification of SoiPB'e4 inE Opacity. -!'I Legendlfor Elevation: W PR - P bofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: SL = S ngline FL = Final Lift Keith LeBlanc, P.E. .-a ! s.I,�TE ®�Q` f � SG = Sibgrade BG = Below Grade Federal Engineering q.sting, nc. BC - B Florida Reg. No. 5939,� secourse BOF = Bottom of Footing ' . 4OR11 TOP = '�op of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of Authorization s 7 fr , As a mut al protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and authorizationrfoF�tl�id'dn of,, statements, concluslo or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density lest determines the degree of wmpaction of theLte§ted IPayer of material only. A de sity does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the underlying, soil materials below the proposed structure. The results do not pre ludo or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test Is required to certify that the underlying soils will support the proposed structure without se lement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be performed to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to su4ort the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rainstorms, retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2 edefa'l 8 TESTING INC. 250 SW 3th Ave Pompano Beach, FL 33069 RECEIVED T 15 2018 Phone 954-784-2941 800-848-1919 Fax 954-784-7875 www.fed-eng.com Field Density Tests of Compa ItDp�38 Proj ct: Proposed Residence Lot 2, Creekside Date: September 28, 2018 Addr' ss: 8323 Cobblestone Drive, Fort Pierce, FL Order #: ' 18DR859 Area jTested: Building Pad Permit M Material Type:. Pale Brown Sand with Traces of Shell Tech: BK D.R. Horton, Inc. 1430 Culver Drive NE Compaction Req.: 95% Palm Bay, FL 32907 Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557. Test # � r TEST LOCATION ', Probe Depth Elev: Moist % Dry Density PCF Proctor Value PCF Optimum moisture /o Compaction Pass 1 Center of Building Pad 12" FL 6.9 , 105.8 107.0 14.0 98.9% Yes 2 JNW Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 11.4 105.0 107.0 14.0 98.1 % Yes 3 E Corner of Building Pad 12" FL 8.3 106.9 107.0 14.0 99.9% Yes 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Rem° rks: See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verification of Soil, Bearing Capacity. Leger d for Elevation: PR = roofroll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by: SL = pringline FL'= Final Lift __'Keith LeBlanc, P.E. �p J71* SG = pubgrade . BG = Below Grade Federal Engineering & Testing; Inc. BC = 3asecourse BOF = Bottom of Footing Florida Reg. No. 59394 TOP Top of Pipe FG = Finished Grade Certificate of -Authorization 05471 As a mtual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients, and authorization far p+iblication of statements, conclus )ns or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test detemilnes the degree of cprnpactlonW th0 tested layerof material only. A ensity does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the underlying soil rriaterials below the proposed structure. The results do not 1 �eclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required to certify that tha underlying soilsfwill support the proposed structure without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that soil borings be perforrhel to evaluate the suitability of the underlying soil to s,1 pport the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storms, retesting must be performed on this work. PAGE 1 of 2 y +1 Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction, test at the referenced project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction7, of the tested layer of material only. In no way shall a compaction, test replace a soil bearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be performed by the client prior to construction to -verify subsoil conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the to'p 12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of the III added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does, not warranty any underlying soil materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to verify the underlying soil conditions. Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is required, we can provide a proposal for performing an environmental. analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is for determination of the degree of compaction of the tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted. Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTM D-1557 standard for building foundations and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc.'shall be notified. Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, rain waters, construction activities, excavations, overgrown, vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -compacted and re -tested pn to construction. As a mutual protection to clients, the, public and ourselves, all reports are ;submitted are the confidential property of and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is re pending written approval. It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future. Page 2 of 2