HomeMy WebLinkAboutENGINEERING TEST RESULTSPh6ne:954-784-2941
�neerrn
954
-en .cam . ' ' admin@fe g
:'.
- g
_ www:fed-eng.com
Oakland.. ...es 33334
. ..-'
;.'.L.n.•
.Or anicC.ontent:Test AASHTO:T-26"
'c'..
' CLI
NT: _ : -Groza Builders;. Inc.::.'
DATE::::: . �1.1-/-14/201.8
PR
JECT; Proposed.Residence = :'. ::
:: :.. :: ' ,ORDER#: 18C1VIT2993 - : . •: .
AD RESS: ' :.• 31.36: S Etocksmith.Road, �Foh Pierce. -FL;:
:.. SA - LED B.Y: -.:' : • - BK : • .: • ' :: ".. • .' .:
' : .:. REPORTEDTO..'. • .:'' : ::. •Client.:
RE 8ULT'OF TESTS
Location: •-Buildirig.Pad :.. ' ' :: ::
:... ::
ample.'Description:.'..' Light Brown Sand:::._
:::..
Crucible' Weight
Crucible
:Crucible: Weight :.
Organic
Weight .. ".
:+Material .:
+Material ..'
Content " ..
: Before Burn _
After Burn
(% by Weight).:::
(grams)
(grams) '
:.
25.3 .:. • " :. : • .: • • :.60.2
.. 60.:....
ested jy` .." :..'.'.:SJ (TIN•#:J32378081'-000)-
r
i Necked By:. : KL: ::..''
. :..
:.. Respectfully:. Subm Submitted � .. ..
:.
. ..
...
Keith:L6.1 /j
u' al E .:.a
'Ee_ er• . ' . n ' �
gir" eerie ' -.. .
. rig, Sri , zsting,:: c, :: •. -- - �:
• :: .:
Flarida;Registtati6n #:'593'94.' .
�ertifiba 'of A� tiiorizatior # 5471
• '..
-4411nn
� �• � :�
- _ ' .: _-,tea .: �•'.: �. ....
invAlraffrrizKOF13
.:1 " ... ' ..
'.� �����;-' • • " . ram^-- ,. .
I eT. -L. .J .. .. .. � . Approved Lie bretory ..
I arun--05KCf
I
Project:
Address',
Area Te:
Material
ederal 0
gineering
esting, Inc.«
rerrY+��-
RECEIVED ,rj
NOV 2 8 2018
Field Density Tests of Compacted Soils Method D-6938
Proposed Residence Date:
Phone: 954-784-2941
E-Fax: 954-784-7875
admin@fed-eng.com
www.fed-en4.com
November 14, 2018
3136 S Brocksmith Road, Fort Pierce, FL �SGAN EDD Order #: 18CMT2993
d: Building Pad �^ Permit #:
ht Brown Sand
Client: Groza Builders, Inc.
Address 1 1 511 SW Port St. Lucie Blvd.
Port St. Lucie, FL 34953
Tech: BK
Compaction Req.: 1 95%
Proctor Method: ASTM D-1557
Test
#
TEST LOCATION
Probe
Depth
Elev.
Moist
%
Dry
Density
PCF
Proctor
Value
PCF
Optimum
Moisture
%
Compaction
Pass
1
Cer
er of Building Pad
12"
FL
10.6
100.9
102.0
14.0
98.9%
Yes
2
S' j�
1,Corner of Building Pad
12"
1 FL
12.5
99.2
102.0
14.0
97.3%
Yes
3
I
SE
orner of Building Pad
12"
FL
11.0
101.3
102.0
14.0
99.3%
Yes
4
NWII;
Corner of Building Pad
12"
FL
11.2
101.1
102.0
14.0
99.1%
Yes
5
6
I,
7
8
9
10
11
,
12
13
14
Remarksa See Reverse Side (Page 2 of 2) for Additional Information for Disclaimer
(III This is a Compaction Test only on the top 12" of the pad and is not a verification of Soil Bearing Capacity.
Legend for; levation:
PR = ProohIiI ll 1,2,3 = 1st, 2nd, 3rd Lift Submitted by:
SL = Spring] ne FL = Final Lift Keith LeMan"c' P.E: r✓:/ f
SG = Subg� de BG = Below Grade Federal `Engineeritig;&'resting, Inc:
BC =Base pse BOF =Bottom of Footing Florida-viReg. No. 59394,.
TOP = Top ipe FG = Finished Grade. Certific te'of Authorization #5471
As a mutual pi tection to clients, the public and •ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of clients,, and authorization for publication, ef,�4atements,
conclusions or, extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved pending our written approval. A density test determines jhA degree -of compar„ion of the,te�fed layer of
material only. A(density does not replace a soil bearing capacity determination. These density tests do not certify the under[ ying4uil rnaierY s-belovr the proposed structure.
The results dol of preclude or guarantee that future settlement and cracking will not occur. A soil boring test is required to ce:tif;tha:,the, underlyir��� soils Will supportthe
proposed struc re without settlement. If no soil borings have been performed to verify the underlying soils, we recommend that'soil bo:mgs'-6e pekf , d to. evaluate the
suitability of th underlying soil to support the proposed structure. After laying dormant for a period of 90 days or after heavy rain/storm`', retesttr,g`rhust be performed on this
work.
PAGE 1 of 2
Compacted Soils Method D-6938 Disclaimer
Pursuant to your request, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. (FET) has performed a compaction test at the referenced
project on the reverse side. The purpose of our test was to determine the degree of compaction of the tested layer of
material only. In no way shall a compaction test replace'a'soil'hearing capacity determination. A soil boring test must be
performed by the client prior to construction to verify subsoil'conditions. Our scope of services only included testing the top
12" of added fill material. FET was not contracted to perform supervision of the building pad preparation. This testing of
the added fill material does not include an analysis of the underlying soil materials to determine if they are capable of
supporting the proposed structure without settlement. This density compaction test does not warranty any underlying soil
materials or conditions below the tested top 12 inches of material. If no soil borings have been performed in the location of
the proposed structure, we recommend performing soil borings below all foundation areas of the proposed structure to
verify the underlying soil conditions.
Environmental analysis of the soil materials is not part of the scope of services. If environmental analysis of the soils is
required, we can provide, a proposal for performing an environmental analysis of the soil materials. The scope of services is
for determination of the degree of compaction of the,tested layer of material only. No other analysis is implied or warranted.
- I
Job project specifications were not available at the time the work was performed. Determination of the pass/fail compaction
results are based on current common industry requirements of 95% of the ASTIVI D-1557 standard for building foundations
and 98% of the AASHTO T-180 standard for paved areas such as roadways and parking lots. If different specifications are
required, Federal Engineering & Testing, Inc. shall be notified.
Our findings are relative to the date and areas of our site work and should not be relied upon to represent conditions on
other areas or dates. Any subsequent site disturbances due to water erosion, .rain waters, construction activities, utility or
footing excavations, overgrown vegetation, traffic and other disturbances will void this test and the site must be re -
compacted and re -tested prior to construction.
As a mutual protection to clients, the public and ourselves, all reports are submitted as the confidential property of our Client
and authorization for use, publication of statements, conclusions or extracts from or regarding our reports is reserved
pending our written approval.
It has been a pleasure working with you and we look forward to doing so in the near future.
Page 2 of 2