The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutINTEROFFICE MEMOSINTER:OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Jan Urso, Zoning Supervisor FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney Nkd C.A. NO: 95-131 , DATE: February 1, 1995 SUBJECT: Coker Road - Proposed Lot Split SCANNED BY St. Lucie County Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed the proposed lot split on Coker Road. I apologize for the delay in my response. In your memorandum to the County Attorney, you indicated that Coker Road was not a dedicated right-of-way but was maintained by the County. Section 11.03.04.D.2 of the Land Development Code requires that each potential lot in a proposed lot split abut a public or private street for the minimum required 'road frontage for the zoning district. If a lot abuts a street right-of-way which does not conform to design specifications, the owner must dedicate one-half (1/2) the right-of-way iwidth necessary to meet these specification. See Section 11.03.04.D.3. The definition of "street' in Section 2.00.00 does not require public dedication and includes a right-of- iway which has become public through prescriptive use. This would appear to be the i case with Coker Road. Therefore, it would appear that frontage on Coker Road may be used to meet the frontage requirements for the proposed lot split. It may be necessary, however, for the property owner to dedicate property to meet the right-of-way width requirements. If you have any questions with regard to the above, please let me know. HY/ sh Copies to: Community Development Director Growth Management Manager Land Development Manager DEPARTMENT OF COAIMI UNITY DEVELOPMENT Growth Management Department MEMORANDUM TO: Dan McIntyre, County Attorney SCANNED FROM: Jan Urso, Zoning Supervisor W • St Val RUC%e CDuniY DATE: December 19, 1994 (SUBJECT: Coker Road Property Appraiser Map 23/08S identifies Coker Road in the area of NSLWMD Canal No. 52 from Orange Avenue south to the south line of Section..0, Township 35, Range 39. The owner of the property highlighted on the attached map has submitted an application for a proposed lot split, as indicated, that would require road frontage on Coker Road to comply with AG 2.5 zoning requirements. The Right -of -Way Division has advised that Coker Road is maintained by the county however, is not a dedicated right- of -way. i Would the fact that it is maintained by the county qualify it as road frontage? i Than you and if my assistance is required please let me know. JU:sr (9L1-0001- �CLO'CR�NG6 000/1) (4x1- s Mnaz> I o ` zvl. 1' 2.1.72, ewh) LANE, A. (412- lo- IJORVlOOD,C.E A <41z-e e— 1.00� eeo/9 1 RObOL1/J0! F.{ J. (421-oee2- eoo/8 s.1E nL. 3E i !\-eeeo-eoo/5 lo.eznc. �U� VCTTER, B.6 R, 43t-eool-ooe/z ' 1o.o3jA4. E V) � I 0 I J LLI.e> SCANNED BY St. Lucie County MERRIBECK 2NC, 4 (4u-eeoo-eoo/3 � 9.51 nc. V 1N.5 10.2e nc. b.25 Ac. ~ 01 ioa,.c, • 4 - LCL ]5 2 dCKSON 1 g.( D. (421-oeol- 010/4 5.29 nc. 35.21 At BRANSCONIB, R. (4aa-sees_eeo/1) • (4 i4- 000 /" L 41K.00w .� � VL q6 •• Za..'IT N4�o 0 2.2s Gii91' 11 �I BEVILLE, R. �, O y°, (411-eels-eoe/G) V w � v n 4.43 AG. a LLILI _ C L.V. S7-1/665 'v la (441- eeo I -000/a FRn4CIS, D.F J (441-eoo2-e00% S.e3 nc.' Iz2 �.zi GRAY, f�� (641-ooe3 '7 e S.e3 nc. 129iL1 I-OT- -T Ae— R J 2 I From: Susan Leager (SUSAND) To: JANET SCANNED Date: Wednesday, March 24, 1993 12:00 n 8y Subject: Phone message from SUSANL of ACQ St•Luc/ e county Phone: 1724 tY i [ ] Telephoned [ ] Please call j [ ] Will call again [ ] Returned your call [ ] Wants to see you [ ] Came to see you [ ] Urgent KER ROAD E WEST SIDE OF COKER ROAD, WHICH LIES ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO S.L.W.M.D. CANAL # 52 RIGHT-OF-WAY RUNS ON THE PROPERTY OWNERS ACTS OF LAND. W COKER ROAD IS MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY ACCORDING TAMMY AT THE ROAD DEPARTMENT YET IS NOT OWNEED BY ST. LUCIE LINTY. E COKER ROAD IS OWNED BY THE N.S.L.W.M.D. AND IS NOT MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY. IN NOVEMBER OF 1985 REQUEST FOR DONATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR E COKER ROAD WAS DENIED BY THE PROPERTY OWNERS. AS OF THIS DATE TAMMY AT THE ROAD DEPARTMENT HAS VERFIED WE DO NOT MAINTAIN THIS RIGHT-O-WAY OWNED BY THE N.S.L.W.M.D.. CIF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEED, PLEASE LET ME KNOW. I INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA I I TO: Jan Urso, Zoning Supervisor FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney RH,j C.A. NO: 95-131 I DATE: February 1, 1995 SUBJECT: Coker Road- Proposed Lot Split FEB - 61995 SCANNED BY St. Lucie County Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed the proposed, lot split on Coker Road. I apologize 'for the delay in my response. In your memorandum to the County Attorney, jyou indicated that Coker Road was not a dedicated right -of --way but was maintained, by the County. Section 11.03.04.D.2 of the Land Development Code requires that each potential lot in a proposed lots' abut a public or private street for the minimumrequired road frontage for the zoning district, if a lot abuts a street right -of --way which does not conform to . design specifications, the :owner must dedicate one-half'(1/2) the right-of-way width necessary to meet these specification, See Section 11;03r04.D.3. The definition. of "street" in Section,2.00.00 doesinot require public dedication. and in6iudes'a right-of- way which has become public 6rdugh prescriptive use. This would appear,to be the case with Coker Road. Therefore, It would appear,that frontage on Coker Road may be used to meet the frontage requirements however, for the for the proposed lot split. It:may be necessary, property owner to dedicate ,property to meet.the right-ofway width requirements. If you have any questions with regard to the above, please let me know. I I I HY/sh Copies to: Community Development Director Growth Management Manager Land Development Manager I I I I I INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Jan Urso, Zoning Supervisor FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney W C.A. NO: 95-131 DATE: February 1, 1995 SUBJECT: Coker Road - Proposed Lot Split I FEB - t 1995 SCANNED BY St. Lucie County Pursuant to your request, I have reviewed the proposed lot split on Coker Road. I apologize for the delay in my response. In your memorandum to the County Attorney, You indicated that Coker Road was not a dedicated right-of-way but was maintained by the County. Section 11.03.04.D.2 of the Land Development Code requires that each potential lot in a proposed lot split abut a public or private street for the minimum required road frontage for the zoning district. If a lot abuts a street right-of-way which does not conform to design specifications, the owner must dedicate one=half (1/2) the right-of-way width necessary to meet these specification. Zen Section 11.03:04.D.3. The definition of "street" in';Section 2.00'00 does not require,public dedication and includes a right -of- way which has become' public through prescriptive use. This would appear to,be the case with. Coker Road. Therefore, it would appear that frontage on Coker Road may be used to meet the frontage requirements for the!;proposed lot split: It may however, necessary, for the property owner to dedicate'property to meet`the ray beright-of-way width requirements. If you have any questions with regard to the above, please let me know. i HY/sh Copies to:. Community Development Director Growth Management Manager Land Development Manager DEPARTMENT OF COXHUNITY DEVELOPMENT GmMh MeuWmeut Department MEMORANDUM TO: Dan. McIntyre, County Attorney FROM: Jan Urso, Zoning Supervisor �. SCANNED DATE: December 19, 1994 SY SUBJECT: Coker Road St. Lucie County. Property Appraiser Map 23/08S identifies Coker Road in the area of NSLWMD Canal No. 52 from Orange Avenue south to the south line of Section 8, Township 35, Range 39. The owner of the property highlighted on the attached submitted an application formap has a proposed lot split, as indicated, that would require road frontage on Coker Road to comply with AG 2.5 zoning requirements. The Right -of -Way Division that Coker Road is maintained has advised by the county however, is not a dedicated right- of -way. Would the fact that it is maintained by the county qualify it as road frontage? Than you and if my assistance is required please let me know. JU:sr i e6a�—��•• ' tl:>e:"x.tr-w• -LYsev ^+c L (hil-0001+ Ltl.e>• {{1 i Ce4T'tel"fl. OO e�j� I Y � Id> 2sy. v HERRIBECK 2NC, 'v Q /3 (411-oe.51 A.. [eae.N) LANE. A. NORIVOOOIC.f A V . " 'Leos, (41z-oele- C (elou eve- .NT lo:0.22. Ac. % f 4 In d i xoo uc (oZoo/d e2 � (414-noel-000�, � I` 1 6.16 Ac. 2.aY wc. + J 4i ' I bUC5eN1 B. t.D "em xV i (ie{-ierom/!J � 1. v d 29 Ac, LLL,1' � BEVILLER. F, e N (<II-oelo-Oee/LJ , d � O " 4.43 Ac. CARTL: R L31-eeeoI of L .� 4; le,ez _ A. o�S �� V n L.V. sT0BB5 CCN-eeel_eee/! ev w L FRA4CIS 1 P.f J. 431-eool-eeo �1 ' w S.e•. L..eO� � Q � Ie,oyk- n mri.>i - U AL Icr a. �. � GRAYI e15, C«I-eeeo e,•� ; Y F U Q e35.1/ Ae P�opes�eQ > • BRANSCOMBIA. ••• . (4�e-eeee_eee/1 8 17 i From: Susan Leager (SUSANL) To: JANET' Date:. Wednesday, -March 24, 1993 S12:00 n ubject: Phone message from SUSANL of ACQ Phone: 1124 [ ] Telephoned I ] Will call again j Wants to see you [ ] Urgent [ ] Please call [ ] Returned your call [ j Came to.see you COKER ROAD THE WEST SIDE OF COKER ROAD, WHICH LIES ADJACENT AND CONTIGUOUS TO N.S.L.W.M.D. CANAL # 52 RIGHT-OF-WAY RUNS ON THE PROPERTY OWNERS TRACTS OF LAND. W COKER ROAD IS MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY ACCORDING TO TAMMY AT' THE LOAD DEPARTMENT YET IS NOT OWNEED BY ST. LUCIE COUNTY. E COKER ROAD IS OWNED BY THE N.S.L.W.M.;D. AND IS NOT MAINTAINED BY THE -COUNTY. OI(ER. ROADRWAS DENIED BYETHEFOR PRO PROPERTY OWNERS.DONATION OF OF THIS MY FOR E ITCAMAT THE ROAD DEPARTMENT HAS VERFIED WE DO NOT MAINTAIN THIS (RIGHT--O-WAY OWNED BY THE N.S.L.•W.M.D.. IF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION IS NEED, PLEASE LET MEKNOW. dui a�tctdt[Q mod'- i2(4y &&k-.D `id diA- FiR �-n.V,`XM *•yL:ia..;[Irr� n�." 1. ""^ :''yt'r�., z•;} a4-. .4 eJ� yeaw I •y wuo >VEUUE . IR C00F " ON ani�' Cffia 00/ 2S5-Ac 3.54 e: 2.5a !. 2.53 ac 5.62 I¢ - OCOUP .0 :VJ- l3Gz- "_ oao� Goal, 5.09 nc 3.07 k iD.0 x J� _ _` I vu r922LV0/Op?1 9.50 rJ/J- fJl3- 'J/J- rIDJ- -1 • lJ2I- 61 �L �- i IXW- ru J2.1- ,, Oco, WJ/9I 05 1 - 006/21 e�J 2.511v- 2$0.- 251 fid Po i 4 r-ai+wcwl .es ry,�. RO°A l3IS0001000/31 .. (33JOW3--\ laJ2oDaa ,e) lfSG2.16Lftir33 X z:d u.•e ran- rJ3r• -r' vD x -: 'x -E \.n ",1➢0/51 Goble) rJo- LHF rJ92 Sac^A _ 2,SLAc v M/5) rWC/O � J, 6) \• lS3 .85 & L50 h L50 Ps 23a k H323.07 /51 --.1 3.85 A. _ lS12�2-0dJ/91 � 1 I _8 23] x y _, e ,y 'r4 i - Ata9-.h " llpJ2EvLtlf)2' P t3/; 04,9), oISGOJC5CW/oJe vy �, 1.Ofi Y - eyn - 3.32 OWl-000/il .-. 2.96 ne -- C 5.03 !3H{O:1l000re1 N f3J4IX.i70000i01 l3AL10.48 /51 29B-gc' .� l4Ri.Y.V00L0/q 10'R3 k -i0A0 h 1 Z" _ " 9.33 F �s •_•. .... ma��. �q10 rJsrorozlad/s� -::' ` a.J3 P /� .00/21 �45`L --• � tw fool- !8(LL _000 00//• Oia2 _ l=14)3- - - ertvrtmecm/si IGIOJDYXO/JJ rG20X1JiGJi61_. _- - -0W/21 ; 9 gf@Jl9Jl21Y.t5/O1� +f�'OW�JI _-- gf80/WIO..gjG2 �reamtifgr/el �Ba'iaJavni , glBp$JJ8�L0/21 v R $rWJQ12P(AO/9J8 ��gD/ny.JflY1i51 m y o H90T.gboOR1 "" 40.53 $�- ` W - 4.02 r$'8Q]35 3All ar3b1005,000/41 5 x R 14Qxo OW/JA 188f4tu2 m \m 10.10 k .l.I{]SrOp/9) i r86'CO�W]/2J-u" rBOI{tlS3LW/A .AfBDJL0i2Qtl . 2.02 k x tl $rNOfOR35(.1bh1 8 fBNNigJ2-010%9J •. 1N3tX.INO olv u Lot a 1e01-00V oAli faJ=6900im 1H30003IX 16) • 2.02 k X i9NODJ9AM/5,-: - - ;�CaJJ'mtoalD/elj n 9 10 231 SEE.. SHEET 23/08N 2 Jzr3 ----,I o R ee axiJ-_ I I zgo9��vaoa/3i _ ij j L- � � CY r��/�i' g, rn �Q7rawTrm�o/w 9.97 a oavooww " 1 �I I 1 LP2 LAKE i I 9 ro 1 e' I' m.14 a mamzvm � i 1 a LAKE i I: 2.41x1 •; 219 K QA%C rm W", 27.0 AA Mil kl m 1 I ! Iito m to O'er r3 zDrfil tiQl' 2.13 00016) � meaa I I 9.. !40�W'.WOJL�/31 . �2'- fMp2v0/0AgeY ' 4.77 I1';11111 a'RF III 01. r' NOINO/A a( C2- y¢. ls.a7 A Azs,L2.WM --- 1 R f4JiOmJ-000/51 10 riM69oramim i s 6.64 qc pp3 Yffi R f p4JFQLFQD/YJ 10/M 9 � a.aJ*scoroa m�ois7 . I SEE SHEET 23/DN •, A 4 6M M 41 r,M2J1 r/61 - 1 fJ2iO 5.43 Ao 1 >6 N '0.4e As r 'mau) 9.04MOC f m s i I Thursday, May 27, 2010 01:16 PM rt! ST. LUCIE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS BUILDING & ZONING DEPARTMENT SCANNED 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE BY FT. PIERCE,. FL. 34962-5652 St. Lucie County • 561-462-1553 DESIGN CERTIFICATION FOR WIND LOAD COMPLIANCE This Certificafion is to be completed by the project design architect or engineer. This Certification must be submitted with all applications for building permit involving the construction of new residence (single or multi -family), residential addition, any accessory structure requiring a building permit, and any nonresidential structure. This Certification shall not apply to interior renovations (provided that no structural walls, columns or other similar component is being effected) and certain other minor building permits. For further assistance, please contact the Building) Inspection Office at 462-1553 or 462-2172. PROJECTINAME TEAVE.` CLESIOENC� OFFICE'USEONLY' STREET ADDRESS PR NUMBER PERMIT NUMBER OCCP. TYPE CST.TYPE CERTIFY THAT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THESE PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS HAVE BEEN DESIGNED TO COMPLY WITH THE APPLICABLE STRUCTURAL PORTION OF THE BUILDING CODES CURRENTLY ADOPTED AND ENFORCED BY ST. LUCIE COUNTY. I ALSO CERTIFY THAT STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS DEPICTED ON THESE PLANS PROVIDE ADEQUATE RESISTANCE TO THE WIND LOADS AND FORCES SPECIFIED BY CURRENT CODE PROVISIONS. 1. STANDARD BUILDING CODE 1997 EDITION ASCE 7-95 _ OTHER (SPECIFY) 2. BUILDING DESIGN IS (CHECK ONE) ENCLOSED PARTIALLY ENCLOSED OPEN BUILDING 3. BUILDING HEIGHT: Z' FT 4. WIND SPEED USED IN BUILDING DESIGN: I (Q) MPH 5. W IND EXPOSURE CLASSIFICATION (REFERTO EXPOSURETABLES IN BUILDING CODE IDENnF1ED IN LINE #1): S. AVERAGE WIND VELOCITY PRESSURE ON EXTERIOR FACES OF STRUCTURE: Z� PSF 7. PEAK WIND VELOCITY PRESSURE ON EXTERIOR FACES OF STRUCTURE: 35— PSF 8. IMPORTANCEIUSE FACTOR (OBTAIN FROM BUILDING CODE): S. LOADS: FLOOR 40 PSF ROOFIDEAD: PSF ROOFILIVE: ( C9 PSF 10. WERE SHEAR WALLS CONSIDERED FOR STRUCTURE (CHECK ONEI YES X NO_ If NO, why? (attach 11. IS A CONTINUOUS LOAD PATH PROVIDED (CHECK ONE) YES NO _ If NO, why? (attach explaination) ,12. ARE COMPONENT AND CLADDING DETAILS PROVIDED (CHECK ONP YES NO_ If NO, why? (attach explainatio In) 13. MINIMUM SOIL BEARING PRESSURE: ZSa PSF AS WITNESSED BY MY SEAL, I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION INCLUDED WITH T k,ICERTIFICATION IS TRUEiAND CORRECT, TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. NAME: ` AOL W PLC N CERTIFICATION NO: �MAY DESIGNFIRM: �UL Lsy �LC4i 11� C 1 DATE: 60 II � DV FORM NO: 020-0J