HomeMy WebLinkAboutSTRUCTURAL ANALYSIS REPORTSeptember 28, 2015
Telecom
RECEIVED OCT 022015
Mike Nisenbaum CALTROP Corporation
T-Mobile USA 3400 Lakeside Drive, Suite 525
1300 Concord Terrace, Suite 200 Miramar, FL 33027
Sunrise, FL 33323 (954) 874-7870
SCANNED
Subject: Rigorous Structural Analysis Report BY
Carrier Designation: T- Mobile: A21`0305M (FL890 — Ankona) St. Lucie County
CALTROP Project Number: 140-946.03
Site Information: 6375 S US Highway 1
Port Saint Lucie, Saint Lucie County, FL 34952
Latitud 27.3487751N, Longitude 80.326922°W
150' Monopole Tower
Dear Mr. Nisenbaum:
CALTROP Corporation (CALTROP) is pleased to submit this Rigorous Structural Analysis Report to
determine if the subject tower is able to support certain proposed additional loads.
It is our understanding that T-Mobile USA (T-Mobile) desires to install new telecommunication equipment
on the subject tower. This analysis was based on the supporting information listed in Table 3.0. Our
services were performed in accordance with the terms and conditions of the existing field services
agreement between CALTROP and T-Mobile. This report summarizes the results of our findings.
The purpose of this analysis is to determine the suitability of thE a o r to support the
loading indicated in Table 2.2. This analysis hL)er)&ed ac rd wi the TIA-222-G
standard, based upon a nominal 3-second gust refer 15 1 no ice. Based on our
analysis, subject to the assumptions noted, it is our wer superstructure and the foundation
system can adequately resist the proposed loading, subject to the assumptions noted, without modification.
Tower: Pass at 100.3%, Foundation: Pass at 86.2%
This report has been prepared for the purpose of providing a structural evaluation of the subject
telecommunications tower for the loading conditions indicated. It is intended for the exclusive use of T-
Mobile. The information, assumptions, and recommendations contained in this report should not be used by
others for any purpose without express written authorization from CALTROP. We appreciate the
opportunity to provide our professional services to you and look forward to continuin�quruelatjpflsh' . If
we can be of any further assistance, please do not hesitate to call.++s�1, A ; p� �e,
—Sincerely-
CALTROP CORPORATION
Ari*eji
Staff Engineer
Registered, Florida 1100018351
Michael A. Phillips, P.E.
Principal Engineer
Registered, Florida 68312
r.
Rigorous Structural Analysis Report — T-Mobile: A21`0305M
CALTROP Corporation
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 ANALYSIS CRITERIA
Table 2.1—Analysis Criteria
Table 2.2—Appurtenance Loading
3.0 ANALYSIS PROCEDURES
Table 3.0—Supporting Information
3.1 Analysis Methods
3.2 Analysis Assumptions & Limitations
4.0 ANALYSIS RESULTS
Table 4.1—Tower Component Results
Table 4.2—Foundation Component Results
APPENDIX A
tnsTower Output
Page 2
September 28, 2015
Rigorous Samctural Analysis Report — T-Mobile: A21`0305M
CALTROP Corporation
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The subject tower is an existing 150' tall monopole tower.
September 18, 2015
2.0 ANALYSIS CRITERIA
The tower was analyzed in accordance with the criteria indicated in Table 2.1 for the proposed and
existing/reserved antennas, transmission lines, and mountings shown in Table 2.2.
Table 2.1—Analysis Criteria
Criteria
Description!
Building Code
Florida Building Code, 5's Edition (2014)
Standard
TIA-222-G Structural Standards for Steel Antenna Towers and Antenna
Supporting Structures FBC 3108.1)
Ultimate Wind Speed
160 mph, 3-Second Gust (per FBC Table 1609A)
Nominal Wind Speed
124 mph, (per FBC 1609.3.1 for use with TIA-222-G)
Exposure
C
Structure Class
II (Importance Factor = 1.0)
Radial Ice Thickness
Zero Inches
Topographic Factor
I
Crest Height
Zero Feet
Table 2.2—Appurtenance Loading
Center
Lm 1 e
Carrier
Number.
Antenna"
-..
Number '
FeedF
Lme
Elevation,
Name
oft'.
' _ ,
1Gifr.
Antenna Model
Mount
bfsFeed-
Size
.
Antennas
Lmes"
(feet)
n
(mclies)':;
150
Unknown
1
Unknown
Lightning Rod
Top
-
150
Verizon
15
CSS
X7CAP-865
Platform
24
1
T-Mobile_
3
Andrew -
DBXNH-6565117__—
_
130
A2M -
Platform
6
1
15/a
1.584
DO
T-Mobile
3
CellMax
CMA-
BDHW6520/-EO-8
130
T-Mobile
3
Andrew
3 Style 3C TMA's
Platform
-
-
130
T-Mobile
3
Andrew
CBC192l-DF-DC-
Platform
-
-
4X (Diplexers)
130
T-Mobile
3
Nokia
FRIG (RRU)
Platform
-
Page 3
Rigorous Structural Analysis Report — T-Mobile: A2P03051f
CALTROP Corporation
September 28. 2015
Center
Feedi
I Carrier.
I Number
Antenna
Numbers
Elevations
Name;
en
Mfc:
Antenna, Model'
Mount,
of Feed
�
1 Size'
t _ (feet),;
Antennas,
,
lines
(finches)!_
130
T-Mobile
2
Nokia
FXFC (RRU)
Platform
-
130
T-Mobile
l
Raycap
RCMDC-4010-PF-
Platform
-
48(COVP)
4
Kathrein
742-265
12
1'%
2
Kathrein
800-10122
120
AT&T
Platform
2 Power
%
1 Fiber
%
1 RET
%
3
Kathrein
800-10764
120
AT&T
12
Kathrein
860-10025 RCU
Platform
-
-
120
AT&T
6
Andrew
ETD8T�Al2UB
Platform
-
-
120
AT&T
6
RFS
FDGW5504/3C-3
Platform
-
-
Diplexer
120
AT&T
6
Ericsson
RRUS-II
Platform
-
-
120
AT&T
1
Raycap
DC6-48-60-18-8F
Platform
-
-
99.6
AIITel
1
Andrew
PL6-59D-1
Dish
1
2
Mount
Legend: Proposed Appurtenances (Bold)
Existing Appurtenances (Regular)
3.0 ANALYSIS PROCEDURES
This analysis is based on published catalog information, the supporting information listed in Table 3.0, and
appurtenance information provided by T-Mobile.
Table 3.0—Supporting Information
.Date
Description
.,By.
Octoberf—,.2014—
-
RFDS
April 17, 2014
Tower Modification Design Drawings
CALTROP Corporation
April 3, 2014
Tower and Foundation Analysis
CALTROP Corporation
December 12, 2013
Site Visit Investigation
CALTROP Corporation
July 23, 2012
RFDS
AT&T
September 17, 2008
Tower and Foundation Analysis
Semaan Engineering Solutions
Page 4
Rigorous Structural Analysis Report — T-Mobile: A21`0305M
CALTROP Corporation
September 28. 2015
August 13, 2007
Tower Mapping
Hightower Solutions, Inc.
Various
Miscellaneous Information
T-Mobile
3.1 Analysis Methods
The tower superstructure analysis was performed with the use of tnxTower, a commercially available
software program designed for the analysis of telecommunications towers. The program was used to
create a three-dimensional mathematical model of the tower and to calculate member stresses under the
appropriate dead, live, and wind loads. Loads were computed in accordance with applicable portions of
the TIA-222-G standard. Selected output from the analysis is included in Appendix A.
A separate analysis of the tower foundation system was performed by comparing the factored reactions
from the tnxTower output to the original foundation design capacities indicated in the tower analysis by
Semaan Engineering Solutions. The capacities were derived by multiplying the design service loads by a
minimum factor of safety of 2.0 and a reduction factor of 0.75 for monopole foundations in accordance
with TIA-222-G Section 9.4.
3.2 Analysis Assumptions and Limitations
• Information in the original design drawings or in the previous analysis that could not be verified
by CALTROP personnel is assumed to be correct.
• All tower components are assumed to be in adequate condition to carry their full design capacity.
• The configuration of antennas, transmission cables, mounts and other appurtenances is assumed
to be as specified in this report.
• Limitations for antenna twist, tilt, roll, or lateral translation are not considered in this analysis,
since the effects of these factors on structural tower performance are typically negligible.
• Emergency/essential communication equipment is not located on the tower.
• This analysis does not consider the capacity of the antenna support systems.
• The foundation system was constructed to develop its full design capacity.
• The tower modifications by CALTROP dated April 17, 2014 have been fully implemented.
4.0 ANALYSIS RESULTS
The following tables summarize analysis results for the tower superstructure and foundation system.
Table 4.1— Tower Component Results
Section
Elevation
Percent
F
No.
Component
(Et. AGL)
Capacity
Results
Used
L1
Monopole
121.25-150
44.9
Pass
L2
Monopole
81.167-121.25
72.5
Pass
L3
Monopole
38-81.167
87.1
Pass
L4
Monopole
0-38
89.2
Pass
Base Plate
0
100.3
*Pass
Anchor Bolts
0
92.9
Pass
-Note: Existing structural component stress ratios up to 105% are considered acceptable.
Page 5
Rigorous Structural Analysis Report — T-Mobile: A2P0305M
CALTROP Corporation
Table 4.2 — Foundation Component Capacity
September 28. 2015
Est.
KrcenC
Comporieff (Factored))
i keactiom
Capacity
Capacity
kesults
Used)
Moment
5905 kips-ft.
7765 kip-ft
86.9
Pass
Shear
58.1 kips
77.2 kips
75.2
Pass
-Note: Existing structural component stress ratios up to 105%are considered acceptable.
Page 6
Rigorous Structural Analysis Report — T-Mobile: A11`03051f September 18, 2015
CALTROP Corporation
APPENDIX A
Tower Input Data
There is a pole section.
This tower is designed using the TIA-222-G standard.
The following design criteria apply:
• Tower is located in Saint Lucie County, Florida.
• Basic wind speed of 124 mph.
• Structure Class ll.
• Exposure Category C.
• Topographic Category 1.
• Crest Height 0.00 ft.
• Deflections calculated using a wind speed of 60 mph.
• A non -linear (P-delta) analysis was used.
• Pressures are calculated at each section.
• Stress ratio used in pole design is 1.
• Local bending stresses due to climbing loads, feed line supports, and appurtenance mounts
are not considered.
Consider Moments - Legs
Consider Moments - Horizontals
Consider Moments - Diagonals
Use Moment Magnification
Use Code Stress Ratios
Use Code Safety Factors - Guys
Escalate Ice
Always Use Max Kz
Use Special Wind Profile
Include Bolls In Member Capacity
Leg Bolts Are At Top Of Section
Secondary Horizontal Braces Leg
Use Diamond Inner Bracing (4 Sided)
Add IBC .6D+W Combination
Options
Distribute Leg Loads As Uniform
Assume Legs Pinned
Assume Rigid Index Plate
Use Clear Spans For Wind Area
Use Clear Spans For KUr
Retension Guys To Initial Tension
Bypass Mast Stability Checks
Use Azimuth Dish Coefficients
Project Wind Area of Appurt.
Autocalc Torque Arm Areas
SR Members Have Cut Ends
Sort Capacity Reports By Component
Triangulate Diamond Inner Bracing
Use TIA-222-G Tension Splice
Capacity Exemption
Treat Feedline Bundles As Cylinder
Use ASCE 10 X-Brace Ly Rules
J Calculate Redundant Bracing Forces
Ignore Redundant Members in FEA
4 SR Leg Bolts Resist Compression
J All Leg Panels Have Same Allowable
Offset Girt At Foundation
J Consider Feedline Torque
Include Angle Block Shear Check
i_T - _ Poles . '
Include Shear -Torsion Interaction
Always Use Sub -Critical Flow
Use Top Mounted Sockets
Tapered Pole Section Geometry
Section
—
- -- — - — -
Elevation
- =—Length--Length--=of—Diameter—
ft--ft
Section
--
Splice
- —ft— _
Number
_Sides
Top
—_in._=
Bottom Wall
Diameter- --Thickness—Radius_--
-.in.- _ in _
Bend
in_
Pole Grade
-
— -L1
160.00-121.25
28.75
4.75
12
24.5800
31.6000
0.2190
0.8760
_
A572-65
(65 ksi)
L2
121.25-81.17
44.83
5.83
12
30.0022
40.9400
0.3440
1.3760
A572-65
(65 ksi)
L3
81.17-38.00
49.00
7.00
12
38.8289
50.7900
0.4060
1.6240
A572-65
(65 ksi)
L4
38.00-0.00
45.00
12
48.2693
59.2500
0.4690
1.8760
A572-65
(65 ksi)
Tapered Pole Properties
Page 7
Rigorous Structural Analysis Report - T-Mobile: A21`0305M
CALTROP Corporation
September 28, 2015
Section
Tip Dia.
in
Area
in'
I
in'
r
in
C
in
I/C
ins
J
in'
It/Q
in'
w
in
w/t
L1
25.4471
17.1789
1301.2815
8.7212
12.7324
102.2021
_2636.7492
8.4549
6.0005
27.4
32.7147
22.1293
2781.6462
11.2344
16.3688
169.9298
5636.1667
10.8913
7.8819
35.99
L2
32.2603
32.8518
3688.3616
10.6176
16.5411
237.3291
7473.6205
16.1686
7.1187
20.694
42.3842
44.9674
9459.1039
14.5334
21.2069
446.0386
19166.709
22.1316
10.0500
29.215
0
L3
41.6728
50.2311
9465.4100
13.7554
20.1134
470.6025
19179.486
24.7222
9.3181
22.951
8
52.5817
65.8680
21342.524
18.0375
26.3092
811.2184
43245.740
32.4182
12.5236
30.846
3
6
L4
51.7404
72.1870
21052.606
17.1125
25.0035
841.9869
42658.288
35.5283
11.6792
24.902
7
8
61.3401
88.7699
39149.441
21.0436
30.6915
1275.5793
79327.383
43.6898
14.6221
31.177
9
2
Tower Gusset Gusset Gusset Grade Adjust. Factor Adjust. Weight Mult. Double Angle Double Angle
Elevation Area Thickness At Factor Stitch Bolt Stitch Bolt
(per face) A, Spacing Spacing
Diagonals Horizontals
L1 150.00-
1
1
1
121.25
L2121.25-
1
1
1
81.17
L381.17-
1
1
1
38.00
L4 38.00-0.00
1
1
1
Monopole Base Plate Data
Base Plate Data
Base plate is square
Base plate is grouted
Anchor bolt grade
A615-75
Anchor bolt size
2.2000 in
Number of bolts
20
Embedment length
72.0000 in
f.
3 ksi
Grout space
2.6300 in
Base plate grade
A633-60
Base plate thickness
3.0000 in
Bolt circle diameter
70.3900 in
Outer diameter
76.3900 in
Inner diameter
59.5000 in
Base plate type
Plain Plate
Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances
-'Entered As Area
Weight
Description
Face
Allow
Component
Placement
Total
CAAA
or
Shield
Type
Number
Leo
R
ff /ft
pit
7/8
B
No
Inside Pole
120.00 - 0.00
2
No Ice
0.00
0.54
(AT&T)
318
B
No
Inside Pole
120.00 - 0.00
2
No Ice
0.00
0.13
(AT&T)
1 5/8
C
No
Inside Pole
120.00 - 0.00
12
No Ice
0.00
1.04
(AT&T)
1 5/8
C
No
Inside Pole
150.00 - 0.00
24
No Ice
0.00
1.04
(Verizon)
1 5/8
B
No
Inside Pole
130.00 - 0.00
6
No Ice
0.00
1.04
Page 8
Rigorous Structural Analysis Report -T-Mobile: A2P0305M
CALTROP Corporation
September 28. 2015
Description Face Allow Component Placement Total CAAA Weight
or Shield Type Number -
Hybrid 1.584 B No Inside Pole 130.00 - 0.00 1 No Ice 0.00 1.04
(T-Mobile)
2" Rigid Conduit C No Inside Pole 99.60 - 0.00 1 No Ice 0.00 2.80
(AIITel)
Feed Line/Linear Appurtenances Section Areas
Tower Tower Face AR AF CAAA CAAA Weight
Sectio Elevation In Face Out Face
L1
150.00-121.25
A
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.00
B
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.06
C
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.72
L2
121.25-81.17
A
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.00
B
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.34
C
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.54
L3
81.17-38.00
A
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.00
B
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.37
C
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.74
L4
38.00-0.00
A
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.00
B
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.33
C
0.000
0.000
0.000
0.000
1.53
Feed Line Center of Pressure
Section
Elevation
CPx
CPz
CPX
CPz
Ice
Ice
It
in
in
in
in
L1
150.00-121.25
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
1-2
121.25-81.17
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
L3
81.17-38.00
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
L4
38.00-0.00
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
Shielding Factor Ka
Tower
Feed Line
Description
Feed Line
K.
K
Section
Record No.
Segment
No Ice
Ice
Elev.
Description Face Offset Offsets: Azimuth Placement CAAA CAAA Weight
or Type Horz Adjustmen Front Side
Leg Lateral t
Vert
ff ff ftr tit K
R
(5) X7CAP-865 A From Face 4.00 0.0000 150.00 No Ice 11.86 7.66 0.06
(Vedzon) 0.00
0.00
(5) X7CAP-865 B From Face 4.00 0.0000 150.00 No Ice 11.86 7.66 0.06
Page 9
Rigorous Structural Analysis Report -
T-Mobile: A2P0305M
September 28. 2015
CALTROP Corporation
Description
Face
Offset
Offsets:
Azimuth
Placement
CAAA
CAAA
Weight
or
Type
Harz
Adjustmen
Front
Side
Leg
Lateral
t
Vert
it
_
R
Re
he
K
it
it
(Vedzon)
0.00
0.00
(5) X7CAP-865
C
From Face
4.00
0.0000
150.00
No Ice
11.86
7.66
0.06
(Verizon)
0.00
0.00
PiROD 13' Low Profile
C
None
0.0000
150.00
No Ice
15.70
15.70
1.30
Platform
(AIITeIq
CMA-BDHH6520-EO-8
A
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
9.96
3.57
0.06
(T-Mobile)
0.00
0.00
CMA-BDHH6520-EO-8
B
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
9.96
3.57
0.06
(T-Mobile)
0.00
0.00
CMA-BDHH6520-EO-8
C
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
9.96
3.57
0.06
(T-Mobile)
0.00
0.00
DBXNH-6565B
A
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
8.41
5.41
0.05
(T-Mobile)
0.00
0.00
DBXNH-6565B
B
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
8.41
5.41
0.05
(T-Mobile)
0.00
0.00
DBXNH-6565B
C
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
8.41
5.41
0.05
(T-Mobile)
0.00
0.00
3C-TMAT1921B78-21A
A
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
0.77
0.36
0.02
(TMA)
0.00
(T-Mobile)
0.00
3C-TMAT1921B78-21A
B
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
0.77
0.36
0.02
(TMA)
0.00
(T-Mobile)
0.00
3C-TMAT1921B78-21A
C
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
0.77
0.36
0.02
(TMA)
0.00
(T-Mobile)
0.00
CBC1921-DF
A
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
0.56
0.41
0.02
(T-Mobile)
0.00
0.00
CBC1921-DF
B
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
0.56
0.41
0.02
(T-Mobile)
0.00
0.00
CBG1921-DF
C
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
0.56
0.41
0.02
(T-Mobile)
0.00
0.00
RCMDC4010-PF-48
C
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
3.79
1.40
0.02
(T-Mobile)
0.00
0.00
FRIG (RF Module)
A
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
Nolce
2.98
1.02
0.05
(T-Mobile)
0.00
0.00
FRIG (RF Module)
B
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
2.98
1.02
0.05
(T-Mobile)
0.00
0.00
FRIG (RF Module)
C
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
2.98
1.02
0.05
(T-Mobile)
0.00
0.00
FXxx (RF Module)
B
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
4.17
1.12
0.06
(T-Mobile)
0.00
0.00
FXxx (RF Module)
C
From Leg
4.00
0.0000
130.00
No Ice
4.17
1.12
0.06
(T-Mobile)
0.00
0.00
Page 10
w
m
g�
m m d o d
T T T
�o o
D� D+Da Da Da I m D� Do DC DC DC DO DQ Dp DQ DJDoo DJ � �
ov " o ^ 3
W o W Od.W- sd�W- N WW W W+ W+ W+ W W o W o W o W N W C N W N v v
�N �A�-�utA dN dN dN d d' d'
C C C m w A A A u O T ut 3
n n O O b
m D O m D D D D O m D O O m D O m D O m
T T T T �iT T TI T T T T T T T T T T T T T
O o l0 o 3 O l0 o O O o O O O O
3 3 3 3 3 I i3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
I
O W O O W O O W O O W O O W O O W O O W O O W O O W O O W O O W O O W O O W O O W O O W O O W O O W O O W O O N O O N O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O OO i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O O O O O O O O
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
O O O O iO 1 0 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
G
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
0
t0�
O
O
N
N
lD
rn rn
m
�
m
O O
O
O
O
0 o
O
O
of
O G
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N N
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O
O O
10
O
O
O
O O
tot
(0
(0
t0
(0
(0
(0
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
O
O
O
+
N
Vt
N
J
J J
A
A
A
Vt
Vt
UN
A
�O
f0
ip
N
O) N
W
W
Oo
N
N
N
J
�O
t0
t0
O
+ O
0
0
0
o
O
o
O
O
o
0
o
O o
c
o
0
0
0
0
0
o
c
o
o
c o
W
W
W
Vt
Ut
N
N
Vt
Vt
N
Vt
0) Vt
O G
v 52
f
a
m
� ° a
�n
y
a
3
yn
a
a
i
4
0
x
Rigorous Structural Analysis Report- T-,Lfobile: A11`0305M
CALTROP Corporation
September 28.2015
Description Face Offset Offsets: Azimuth Placement CAAA CAAA Weight
or Type Horz Adjustmen Front Side
Leg Lateral t
Vert _
it it ft2 ft' K
ft °
0.00
(4) 860-10025 RCU
C From Leg
3.00 0.0000 120.00 No Ice 0.16 0.14 0.00
(AT&T)
0.00
0.00
FWT Low Profile Platform
C None
0.0000 120.00 No Ice 56.00 56.00 2.70
(AT&T)
Dish Mounting Pipe
C From Leg
0.00 0.0000 99.60 No Ice 1.45 1.45 0.04
(AIITel)
0.00
Dishes
Description
Face Dish
Offset
Offsets:
Azimuth 3 dB
Elevation Outside
Aperture
Weight
or Type
Type
Horz
Adjustment Beam
Diameter
Area
Leg
Lateral
Width
Vert
ft
it ft
ft
K
PLS-59D
Paraboloid w/o
None
0.0000
99.60 6.00
No Ice 28.27
0.14
(AllTel)
Radome
Tower Pressures - No Ice
GH = also
Section
Elevation
ft
z
ft
Kz
q,
psf
Ac
fe
F
a
a
AF
ftr
An
ft
Awe
ff
Leg
%
Fff
CAAA
In
Ffte
CAAA
Out
L1150.00-
135.03
1.348
50
69.673
A
0.000
69.673
69.673
100.00
0.000
0.000
121.25
B
0.000
69.673
100.00
0.000
0.000
C
0.000
69.673
100.00
0.000
0.000
L2 121.25-
100.51
1.267
47
124.66
A
0.000
124.666
124.666
100.00
0.000
0.000
81.17
6
B
0.000
124.666
100.00
0.000
0.000
C
0.000
124.666
100.00
0.000
0.000
L3 81.17-
59.17
1.133
42
169.52
A
0.000
169.528
169.528
100.00
0.000
0.000
38.00
8
B
0.000
169.528
100.00
0.000
0.000
C
0.000
169.528
100.00
0.000
0.000
L4 38.00-0.00
19.09
0.893
34
179.04
A
0.000
179.044
179.044
100.00
0.000
0.000
4
B
0.000
179.044
100.00
0.000
0.000
C
1 0.0001
179.0441
1 100.001
0.0001
0.000
Tower Pressure - Service
GH = 0.850
Section
z
Kz
q,
F
AF
An
A,,
Leg
CAAA
CAAA
Elevation
FIfeG
.1
%
In
Out
c
Face
Face
ft
ft
sf
a
ft,
ff
ft 2
ft2
ftz
L1150.00-
1 135.031
1.3481
11
69.6731
A
0.000
69.673
69.673
-100.001
0.0001
0.000
Page 12
rn
W+ WN
NO
OO
jA
�a
+ N + O
S 4
rn m I m; J
W
m w rn
Ol N m N
io io
A' N
i
O m D o m D Om DIO m DmomT
f I
m
A N
V O
0
+
+�1
W V V V rn rn rn N N ly rn m rn
A A t0
a
m
6 b 6f06
- m 6 b)�,
'�OOOUI fT (T birnrnmmcl
rn A N N N rn rn rn V J V
�'N
AmmmrnrnrnWWW
T. T
t0 fT m
m N
N + O
rn V m
O N
tp
uo c,Ni� w
p F
(OT W (00 N
O OI
� O
T o
m �
S--I
9
1
m
3
r
r
+
O W
m m+
+
O
S
O p
O V
V N
N 0
O
co
m
W
it
N
m
m
m
A
io
N
ow>omDOmDomDmomT
+ +
m
n
Nm
A
N
J
O
------------
A
K..a----------
W
F m
V V V
f0 t0 (O
rn rn rn N N N rn rn rn
t0 (O t0 A A A c0 f0 lD
�
a
m
-•N
N
pOA yOA yOA
AAA
UI (T Ulmmmmmm
w w w m m o W W W
x
T
m
�n
rn
rn
N
rn
V
m
(O
rn
rn
m
in
Tq
O
O
o
o
S
A
m
m
r j
m m
O O V fA
(O fD O
O �
O J
O + +
W W V
(n
A
� o
o rn rn
A A m N rn rn
O m D o m D O m D O m
m m m T
00000000000
�, n
O O O O O O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
J J J m rn m N N N rn rn
t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 t0 A A A t0 t0
�` n
A
AOA yOy yOyNNNOmI�AJV
A A A m m m rn m rn W W
t0 (O A
S
6
A N m
A m m
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O O O O O O
N
A�
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o
00000000000
m n
00000000000
N �4�
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
O G G C O O O O G G G
�,n ^➢
00000000000
N
00000000000
y
0
P
R
y
a
Rigorous Structural Analysis Report - T-Mobile: A2P0305M
CALTROP Corporation
Tower Forces - No Ice - Wind 90 To Face
September 28, 2015
Section
Elevation
It
Add
Weight
K
Self
Weight
K
F
a
c
e
e
CF
qr
psf
DF
De
AE
1f
F
K
w
plf
Co.
Face
L1150.00-
0.78
1.92
A
1
1
50
1
1
69.673
2.99
103.85
C
121.25
B
1
1
1
1
69.673
C
1
1
1
1
69.673
L2 121.25-
1.88
5.94
A
1
1
47
1
1
124.666
5.01
125.09
C
81.17
B
1
1
1
1
124.666
C
1
1
1
1
124,666
L3 81.17-
2.11
9.68
A
1
1
42
1
1
169.528
6.08
140.86
C
38.00
B
1
1
1
1
169.528
C
1
1
1
1
169.528
L4 38.00-
1.86
12.32
A
1
1
34
1
1
179.044
5.17
135.95
C
0.00
B
1
1
1
1
179.044
C
1
1
1
1
179.044
Sum Weight:
6.63
29.86
OTM
1365.52
19.25
ki -ft
Tower Forces - Service - Wind Normal To Face
Section
Elevation
ft
Add
Weight
K
Self
Weight
K
F
a
c
e
e
CF
q:
psf
DF
Da
AE
ftz
F
K
w
Pif
Ctrl.
Face
L1150.00-
0.78
1.92
A
1
1
11
1
1
69.673
0.63
21.76
C
121.25
B
1
1
1
1
69,673
C
1
1
1
1
69.673
L2 121.25-
1.88
5.94
A
1
1
10
1
1
124.666
1.05
26.21
C
81.17
B
1
1
1
1
124.666
C
1
1
1
1
124.666
L3 81.17-
2.11
9.68
A
1
1
9
1
1
169.528
1.27
29.51
C
38.00
B
1
1
1
1
169.528
C
1
1
1
1
169.528
L4 38.00-
1.86
12.32
A
1
1
7
1
1
179.044
1.08
28.48
C
0.00
B
1
1
1
1
179.044
C
1
1
1
1
179.044
Sum Weight:
6.63
29.86
OTM
286.06
4.03
ki -ft
Tower Forces - Service - Wind 60 To Face
Section
Elevation
ft
Add
Weight
K
Self
Weight
K
F
a
C
e
e
CF
q.
psf
DF
De
AE
ftr
F
K
w
Pit
CO.
Face
L1150.00-
0.78
1.92
A
1
1
11
1
1
69.673
0.63
21.76
C
121.25
B
1
1
1
1
69.673
C
1
1
1
1
69.673
L2 121.25-
1.88
5.94
A
1
1
10
1
1
124.666
1.05
26.21
C
81.17
B
1
1
1
1
124.666
C
1
1
1
1
124.666
L3 81.17-
2.11
9.68
A
1
1
9
1
1
169.528
1.27
29.51
C
38.00
B
1
1
1
1
169.528
C
1
1
1
1
169.528
Page 14
Rigorous Structural Analysis Report -T-Mobile: A21`0305M
CALTROP Corporation
September 28. 1015
Section
Add
Self
F
e
CF
q=
OF
De
Aa
F
w
Ctrl.
Elevation
Weight
Weight
a
Face
c
ps
ft
K
K
e
ff
K
pit
L4 38.00-
1.86
12.32
A
1
1
7
1
1
179.044
1.08
28.48
C
0.00
B
1
1
1
1
179.044
C
1
1
1
1
179.044
Sum Weight:
6.63
29.86
OTM
286.06
4.03
ki -ft
Tower Forces - Service - Wind 90 To Face
Section
Elevation
itK
Add
Weight
Sell
Weight
K
F
a
e
e
CF
q:
psf
OF
Da
AF
ftz
F
K
w
pit
Co..
Face
L1150.00-
0.78
1.92
A
1
1
11
1
1
69.673
0.63
21.76
C
121.25
B
1
1
1
1
69.673
C
1
1
1
1
69.673
L2121.25-
1.88
5.94
A
1
1
10
1
1
124.666
1.05
26.21
C
81.17
B
1
1
1
1
124.666
C
1
1
1
1
124.666
L3 81.17-
2.11
9.68
A
1
1
9
1
1
169.528
1.27
29.51
C
38.00
B
1
1
1
1
169.528
C
1
1
1
1
169.528
L4 38.00-
1.86
12.32
A
1
1
7
1
1
179.044
1.08
28.48
C
0.00
B
1
1
1
1
179.044
C
1
1
1
1
179.044
Sum Weight:
6.63
29.86
OTM
286.06
4.03
ki -ft
Force Totals
Load
Vertical
Sum of
Sum of
Sum of
Sum of
Sum of
Case
Forces
Forces
Forces
Overturning
Overturning
Torques
X
Z
Moments, M,
Moments, M.
K
K
K
kip-ft
kip-ft
ki -ft
Leg Weight
29.86
Bracing Weight
0.00
Total Member Self -Weight
29.86
-0.29
0.15
Total Weight
44.41
-0.29
0.15
_
Wind 0 deg - No Ice
Wiha-30 deg-No7lce-
0.04
- - 18.15
-35.76
-: 30.99
-3537.50
__ 30%46.
-5.56
_-1802.27
-0.37
_ -0,98
- -�--
Wind 60 deg- No -Ice
_ =31.40
-17_92
-1773.84
-3116.03
-133
Wind 90 deg.- No Ice
36.23
-0.04
--6.00
`--3594`81
--1132
Wind 120 deg - No Ice
31.35
- 17.84
- 1763.37
-3110..32
--0.96
Wind 150 deg - No Ice
18.07
30.94
3060.17
-1792.38
-0.34
Wind 180 deg - No Ice
-0.04
35.76
3536.92
5.86
0.37
Wind 210 deg - No Ice
-18.15
30.99
3065.88
1802.57
0.98
Wind 240 deg - No Ice
-31.40
17.92
1773.26
3116.33
1.33
Wind 270 deg - No Ice
-36.23
0.04
5.42
3595.11
1.32
Wind 300 deg - No Ice
-31.35
-17.84
-1763.95
3110.62
0.96
Wind 330 deg - No Ice.
-18.07
-30.94
-3060.75
1792.68
0.34
Total Weight
44.41
-0.29
0.15
Wind 0 deg - Service
0.01
-7.49
.741.28
-1.05
-0.08
Wind 30 deg - Service
3.80
-6.49
-642.61
-377.43
-0.21
Wind 60 deg - Service
6.58
-3.75
-371.82
-652.65
-0.28
Wind 90 deg - Service
7.59
-0.01
-1.49
-752.94
-0.28
Page 15
Rigorous Struclural Analysis Report- T-Mobile: A11`0305M
CALTROP Corporation
September 28, 2015
Load
Vertical
Sum of
Sum of
Sum of
Sum of
Sum of
Case
Forces
Forces
Forces
Overturning
Overturning
Torques
X
Z
Moments, M.
Moments, M,
K
_ K
K -
_ -kip-ft
kip-k
ki -ft
Wind 120 deg - Service
6.57
3.74
369.17
-651.45
-0.20
Wind 150 deg - Service
3.79
6.48
640.83
-375.36
-0.07
Wind 180 deg - Service
-0.01
7.49
740.70
1.35
0.08
Wind 210 deg - Service
-3.80
6.49
642.03
377.73
0.21
Wind 240 deg - Service
0Wind
-6.58
3.75
371.24
652.94
0.28
Wind 270 deg - Service
-7.59
0.01
0.91
753.24
0.28
Wind 300 deg - Service
-6.57
•3.74
-369.75
651.75
0.20
330 de -Service
-3.79
-6.48
-641.411
375.66
0.07
_ _ _ _ Load Combinations _
Comb. Description
No.
2 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg - No Ice
3 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg - No Ice
4 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 30 deg - No Ice
5 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 30 deg - No Ice
6 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg - No Ice
7 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg - No Ice
8 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg - No Ice
9 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg - No Ice
10 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 120 deg - No Ice
11 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 120 deg - No Ice
12 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg - No Ice
13 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg - No Ice
14 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg - No Ice
15 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg - No Ice
16 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg - No Ice
17 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg - No Ice
18 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg - No Ice
19 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg - No Ice
20 1.2 Dead+1,6 Wind 270 deg - No Ice
21 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 270 deg - No Ice
22 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg - No Ice
23 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg - No Ice
24 1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg - No Ice
25 0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg - No Ice
26 Dead+Wind 0 deg - Service
27 Dead+Wind 30 deg - Service
28 Dead+Wind 60 deg - Service
29 Dead+Wind 90 deg - Service
30 Dead+Wind 120 deg - Service
31 Dead+Wind 150 deg - Service
32 Dead+Wind 180 deg - Service
33 Dead+Wind 210 deg - Service
34 Dead+Wind 240 deg - Service
35 Dead+Wintl 270 deg - Service
36 Dead+Wind 300 deg - Service
37 Dead+Wind 330 deg - Service
Maximum Memberforces .
Sectio Elevation
Component
Condition
Gov.
Axial
Major Axis
Minor Axis
n ft
Type
Load
Moment
Moment
No.
Comb.
K
kip-ft
kip-ft
L1 150 - 121.25
Pole
Max Tension
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
Max. Compression
1
-6.25
0.09
-0.37
Page 16
Rigoroas Structural Analysis Report - T-Mobile: A21`0305M
CALTROP Corporation
September 28, 2015
Sec0o
n
No.
Elevation
it
Component
Type
Condition
Gov.
Load
Comb.
Axial
K
Major Axis
Moment
kip-R
Minor Axis
Moment
kip-ft
Max. Mx
20
-5.57
328.94
-0.59
Max. My
14
-5.63
0.33
-328.24
Max. Vy
20
-20.50
328.94
-0.59
Max. Vx
2
-20.26
-0.15
327.37
Max. Torque
22
0.63
1-2
121.25 -
Pole
Max Tension
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
81.167
Max. Compression
14
-18.15
3.18
-1571.27
Max. Mx
20
-18.05
1599.61
-2.72
Max. My
2
-18.15
-2.85
1571.97
Max. Vy
20
-40.03
1599.61
-2.72
Max. Vx
2
-39.26
-2.85
1571.97
Max. Torque
9
2.15
1-3
81.167 - 38
Pole
Max Tension
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
Max. Compression
14
-32.43
6.29
-3412.96
Max. Mx
20
-32.38
3473.70
-5.77
Max. My
2
-32.43
-5.93
3413.67
Max. Vy
20
-49.16
3473.70
-5.77
Max. Vx
2
-48.39
-5.93
3413.67
Max. Torque
19
-2.09
L4
38 - 0
Pole
Max Tension
1
0.00
0.00
0.00
Max. Compression
14
-53.25
9.56
-5798.49
Max. Mx
20
-53.25
5893.52
-9.03
Max. My
2
-53.25
-9.19
5799.21
Max. Vy
20
-58.00
5893.52
-9.03
Max. Vx
2
-57.25
-9.19
5799.21
Max. Torque
19
-2.09
Maximum Reactions
Location Condition
Gov.
Vertical
Horizontal, X
Horizontal, Z
Load
K
K
K
Comb.
Pole Max. Vert
20
53.29
57.96
-0.07
Max. H.
20
53.29
57.96
-0.07
Max. H.
2
53.29
-0.07
57.21
Max. M.
2
5799.21
-0.07
57.21
Max. M.
8
5893.15
-57.96
0.07
Max. Torsion
7
2.08
-50.23
28.67
Min. Vert
5
39.97
-29.04
49.58
Min. H.
8
53.29
-57.96
0.07
Min. H,
14
53.29
0.07
-57.21
Min. M.
14
-5798.49
0.07
-57.21
Min. M,
20
-5893.52
57.96
-0.07
Min. Torsion
19
-2.08
50.23
-28.67
Tower Mast Reaction Summary-- -
Load
Combination
vertical
K
Shea,
K
Shear,
K
Overturning
Moment, M,
kip-ft
Overturning
Moment, M,
kip-ft
Torque
kip-ft
Dead Only
44.41
0.00
0.00
-0.29
0.15
0.00
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg -
53.29
0.07
-57.21
-5799.21
-9.19
-0.58
No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 0 deg -
39.97
0.07
-57.21
-5761.47
-9.18
-0.58
No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 30 deg -
53.29
29.04
-49.58
-5026.91
-2954.71
-1.53
No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 30 deg -
39.97
29.04
-49.58
-4994.18
-2935.55
-1.53
Page 17
Rigorous Structural Analysis Report- T-Mobile: A2P0305M September 28, 201S
CALTROP Corporation
Load
vertical
Shear,
Shea,
Overturning
Overturning
Torque
Combination
Moment, M.
Moment, M.
K
K
K
kip-tt
kip-R
kip-tt
No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg -
53.29
50.23
-28.67
-2907.78
-5108.33
-2.07
No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 60 deg -
39.97
50.23
-28.67
-2888.81
-5075.18
-2.08
No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 90 deg -
53.29
57.96
-0.07
-9.73
-5893.15
-2.06
No Ice
0.9 Deatl+1.6 Wind 90 deg -
39.97
57.96
-0.07
-9.57
-5854.91
-2.07
No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 120 deg
53.29
50.16
28.64
2890.86
-5098.99
-1.50
- No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 120 deg
39.97
50.16
28.54
2872.18
-5065.91
-1.51
- No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg
53.29
28.92
49.51
5016.87
-2938.48
-0.53
- No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 150 deg
39.97
28.92
49.51
4984.39
-2919.44
-0.54
- No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg
53.29
-0.07
57.21
5798.49
9.56
0.58
- No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 180 deg
39.97
-0.07
57.21
5760.93
9.45
0.58
- No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg
53.29
-29.04
49.58
5026.20
2955.07
1.54
- No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 210 deg
39.97
-29.04
49.58
4993.66
2935.82
1.54
- No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 240 deg
53.29
-50.23
28.67
2907.07
5108.69
2.08
- No Ice
0.9 Deatl+1.6 Wind 240 deg
39.97
-50.23
28.67
2888.29
5075.45
2.08
- No Ice
1.2 Deatl+1.6 Wind 270 deg
53.29
-57.96
0.07
9.03
5893.52
2.06
- No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 270 deg
39.97
-57.96
0.07
9.05
5855.19
2.07
- No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg
53.29
-50.16
-28.54
-2891.56
5099.37
1.49
- No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 300 deg
39.97
-50.16
-28.54
-2872.70
5066.19
1.50
- No Ice
1.2 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg
53.29
-28.92
-49.51
-5017.58
2938.86
0.53
- No Ice
0.9 Dead+1.6 Wind 330 deg
39.97
-28.92
-49.51
-4984.92
2919.72
0.53
- No Ice
Dead+Wind 0 deg - Service
44.41
0.01
-7.49
-757.33
-1.07
-0.08
Deatl+Wind 30 deg - Service
44.41
3.80
-6.49
-656.52
-385.60
-0.20
Dead+Wnd 60 deg - Service
44.41
6.58
-3.75
-379.87
-666.77
-0.28
Dead+Wind 90 deg - Service
44.41
7.59
-0.01
-1.53
-769.24
-0.27
Dead+Wintl 120 deg -
44.41
6.57
3.74
377.15
-665.55
-0.20
Service
Dead+Wind 150 deg -
44.41
3.79
6.48
654.69
-383.48
-0.07
Service
Dead+Wind 180 deg -
44.41
-0.01
7.49
756.72
1.38
0.08
Service
Dead+Wind 210 deg -
44.41
-3.80
6.49
655.91
385.91
0.20
Service
Dead+Wind 240 deg -
44.41
-6.58
3.75
379.27
667.08
0.28
Service
Dead+Wintl 270 deg -
44.41
-7.59
0.01
0.92
769.55
0.27
Service
Dead+Wind 300 deg -
44.41
-6.57
-3.74
-377.75
665.86
0.20
Service
Dead+Wind 330 deg -
44.41
-3.79
-6.48
-655.29
383.79
0.07
Service
Solution Summary- .
Page 18
b
I
N N N N N N N N N N N N N NON
N N N N N N N N N N N N N N�N
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
00000000000000
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W+ W+ W+++ W+ W N A+
V +NNW O N W N N V m N
N m m mow
O W m m m
m m J J m O J W N+ W m
N A O m m O N A m W m O W m
11
W W W W W W W N N N N N N N N N N+ -+ ++ -+ +++++ O w V m m A W N
m m A W N+ O tp m J m m A W N+ O t0 m J m m A W N+ O
O]J6
m fTmmOOWVG�tTmmppNppD.00
OO pNtpo P 00 V V go O<NO pN00
tp++tO tONN0000
VtOmO+WVtOmO+NNmmTOOiWWAAVVNNmmmmWWAAVV
A AAAAAAA ioK)tbK);WO(mJZ. ig tWO (mJ tWO tmJ tWO (mJ tWO WPM." -WO tNJ NiD im
A A A A A A A A A A A ip !J ip !J t0 !J Z. fJ tp N t0 !J ip IV t0 fJ ip IV ip IJ ip IJ ip IV
�j OWmVmWOC, A 44t�O.t4D.ONo �3 "M mO m. tAp .ONo� o O� W)11 .t�-O VJ
p+fT tD �OmA�(Jn����mmVOV �m(IIN IJNmmAfl�V Vp�mmmlJN
A V V m m++++ V J m m++
m VmWO NNmmmmmmNNOONNNNtT N(T (1�NN
W O�JTWOWmOOJV00�0 �D. bb
mmOOVVOOtO fO.
V m�O�VmtltmmOip �O++tO fDNNO00O�p /p++�p ipNN00��
fD V N m 0+ N N m m m m W W A A V V N N m m m m W W A A
AAAAAAAA�AAtWO tmJ tWO W fWDW tWp W FWD W tWp W FWD W FWD W (WD tmJ (WO tmJ tWO tmJ tWO tmJ
A � A � ? A � A A � ip IJ i0 IJ iD fJ ip IJ i0 IJ ip N 10 IJ tp N (D fJ t0 N tO IJ <O fJ
J tp JtO J�DJroJNVtDV �DV NV tpV fOJtO V t0
W 6c 6 V m WOOOmW 444 V VtL-A-t� F�)QO W W t 4 704
V OJAAA+IOVAANmmm00' 0001m Ulm lJ lJ
A+mw/OmA+mrom++AAJV�Vm�NN(T tT (T tIiVVVVmm++
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o b o 0 0 0 0 0
O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O o O O O O
00000000000000000000000000000000000
N
4
k
N
Q
1
R
OZ 00ed
amlenm0 peo7
Jo snlpea Islnll III uoU0eUe0 no0 aoueueunddy uoUenel3
pum u lsaa - am;emno;o snipeb Fie suol;oouoa molwo
L L00'0
L£L8'L
OZ
£OE'6
0-Sb
bl
Z£00'O
RUST
OZ
69L5£
BE-L8
£l
SL00"0
0£94'9
OZ
99VIIZ
L9VL8-9ZL
Z1
9L00"O
96V6'9
OZ
9£L'£OL
9Z'LZL-OSL
Ll
o
•gw00
ul
g
peo7
u01091je0
ON
Jslml
J11
'no0
'ZJOH
uo/Ienal3
uogoag
puiM u isaa - suoi;aaj}aa iemol wnwixew
9990E
9000'0
bZ89'0
L60'9
9£
069-91d
09'66
Z84ZL
6000'0
Z889'0
408'8
S£
S9Z-ZYL (Z)
00'OZL
9Z89L
MOTO
09ZL'0
00£'OL
5£
9-03-OZ59HH08-VINO
00'0£L
06Z£9
OL00'O
£LLL'0
L84'£L
9£
syz poa 6ulu146l1
00'05L
!/
ul
gwo0
U
ajnlenm0
peo7
JOSMpea
Islml
J/1
uoU0aUa0
-no0
eoueuepnddy uogena/3
puiM aauuag - ajn4en,in3;o snipek pue suoi;oai3ed ieai;dip,
L000 0
944Z'0
SE
9LZ'L
0-Sb
bl
4000'0
LSOS'0
5£
E691,
8£-L8
£l
O L00'0
ZZLL'0
SE
L69'6
L9VW-9ZL
Zl
MOTO
ELLL"0
S£
LeVU
9zlU-094
Gl
o
o
'gwo0
ul
U
pe07
u0000900
'ON
Islml
J/1
'no3
VOH
uOUene/3
uor1093
pulm aouuag - suopoal;aa jamol wnwixeW
LZ690000'0
L0000000'0
b
saA
LE
££990000'0
L0000000'0
4
saA
9E
9£LL0000 0
L0000000"0
4
saA
S£
LL990000'0
L0000000"0
b
saA
b£
OV990000'0
L0000000'0
4
saA
££
NZL0000'O
L0000000'0
b
saA
Z£
L9 L90000'0
L0000000'0
b
saA
L£
9OLS0000'0
L0000000'0
4
saA
OE
59LL0000'0
L0000000'0
4
saA
6Z
LU900000
L0000000'0
4
saA
9Z
M90000'0
L0000000'0
b
saA
LZ
Z9ZL0000'0
L0000000'0
4
saA
9Z
9LZZL000'0
L0000000'0 _
S
saA
9Z
_
Z69Z6000`0
L0000000'0
9
saA
4Z
L£9ZL000'O
0000000'0
9
saA
£Z
£Z4£E000'0
L0000000'0
5
saA
ZZ
OZbLZo00'0
L0000000'0
b
saA
LZ
uopwodla0 dOg17V0
S/OZ 'BZ jagwaldag HSOfOdZV +allgoN-1 — liodag srsdl-V loinnngS snojo8.,g
Rigorous Structural Analysis Report- T-Mobile: A2P0305M September 28, 2015
CAL TROP Corporation
Elevation
Appurtenance
Gov.
Deflection
Till
Twist
Radius of
Load
Curvature
ft
Comb.
in
°
ft
150.00
Lightning Rod 2"xl5'
20
103.135
5.9496
0.0076
8460
130.00
CMA-BDHH6520-EO-8
20
78.826
5.5580
0.0076
2113
120.00
(2) 742-265
20
67.385
5.2695
0.0071
1662
99.60
PL6-591)
20
46.378
4.4604
0.0047
1398
Base Plate Design Data
Plate Number Anchor
Actual
Actual
Actual
Actual Controlling Ratio
Thickness of Bolt Size
Allowable
Allowable
Allowable
Allowable Condition
Anchor
Ratio
Ratio
Ratio
Ratio
Bolts
Bolt
Bolt
Plate
Stiffener
Tension
Compressio
Stress
Stress
in in
K
n
ksi
ksi
3.0000 20 2.2000 198.28 203.61 54.157 Plate 1.00 X
213.82 354.95 54.000
0.93 0.57 1.00
Compression Checks
Pole Design Data
Section
Elevation
Size
L
L„
KI1r
A
P.
(lip.
Ratio
No.
P.
ft
ft
ft
in2 -
K
K ,
(I,P�
1-1
150 - 121.25
TP31.6x24.584.219
28.75
150.00
166.4
21.311
-5.58
173.94
0.032
(1)
4
L2
121.25-
TP40.9430.00220.344
44.83
150.00
128.4
43.391
-18.05
595.02
0.030
81.167(2)
1
L3
81.167 - 38
TP50.79x38.8289x0.406
49.00
150.00
103.3
63.634
-32.38
1347.31
0.024
(3)
2
L4
38 - 0 (4)
TP59.25x48.2693x0.469
45.00
150.00
85.5
88.769
-53.25
2651.11
0.020
9
Pole Bending Design Data
- __ Secbon
Elev`aGo'n
Size -
=Ma
- r Ml ,---Ratio-M,
- r M„r_-Ratio-
- -
-- No---"_---
= ----
--
_M„x_
_
_ _ __
-- -- -
- - ft-
- - - _
kip-ft
_ kip-ft
_TM7
kip-ft
kip-ft
L1
150-121.25
TP31.6x24.58x0.219
329.09
791.85
0.416
0.00
791.85
0.000
(1)
1-2
121.25-
TP40.9430.00224.344
1599.62
2306.18
0.694
0.00
2306.18
0.000
81.167(2)
L3
81.167 - 38
TP50.79x38.8289x0.406
3473.70
4104.50
0.846
0.00
4104.50
0.000
(3)
L4
38 - 0 (4)
TP59.25x48.2693x0.469
5893.52
6764.84
0.871
0.00
6764.84
0.000
Pole Shear Design Data
Page 21
Rigorous Structural Analysis Report- T-Mobile: A21`0505M September 28, 2015
CALTROP Corporation
Section Elevation Size Actual Ratio Actual QT Ratio
No. V V T. T
R K K 4y kip-R k/p-tt 6T
L1
150 - 121.25
TP31.6x24.58x0.219
20.49
(1)
L2
121.25 -
TP40.9430.0022x0.344
40.03
81.167(2)
L3
81.167 - 38
TP50.79x38.8289x0.406
49.16
(3)
L4
38 - 0 (4)
TP59.25x48.2693x0.469
58.00
1446.10
0.028
2.07
4676.21
0.000
2070.40
0.024
2.06
8322.65
0.000
2824.67
0.021
2.06
13717.00
0.000
Pole Interaction Design Data
Section Elevation
Ratio
Ratio Ratio Ratio Ratio Comb.
Allow. Criteria
No.
P.
M. M„t. V. T. Stress
Stress
itP
M . M V„ Ratio
Ratio
L1 150 - 121.25
0.032
0.416 0.000 0.032 0.000 0.449
1.000
1
482
()
V
L2 121.25 -
0.030
0.694
0.000
0.028
0.000
0.725
1.000
V
81.167(2)
4 8 2
L3 81.167 - 38
0.024
0.846
0.000
0.024
0.000
0.871
1.000
(3)
4 8 2
L4 38 - 0 (4)
0.020
0.871
0.000
0.021
0.000
0.892
1.000
4.8.2
Section Caaacity Table
Section
Elevation
Component
Size
Critical
P
op,,
%
Pass
No.
R
Type
Element
K
K
Capacity
Fail
L1
150 - 121.25
Pole
TP31.6x24.58x0.219
1
-5.58
173.94
44.9
Pass
L2
121.25- 81.167
Pole
TP40.9030.00220.344
2
-18.05
595.02
72.5
Pass
L3
81.167- 38
Pole
TP50.79x38.8289x0.406
3
-32.38
1347.31
87.1
Pass
L4
38 - 0
Pole
TP59.25x48.2693x0.469
4
-53.25
2651.11
89.2
Pass
Summary
Pole (L4)
89.2
Pass
Base Plate
100.3
Pass
RATING=
100.3
Pass
c
Page 22
E
V
8
$
P-
E
_
y
s
l213ftft
81.2ft
38.0ft
as 8
IIii
AAn�nrr
RIIFI
DESIGNED APPURTENANCE LOADING
TYPE
ELEVATION
TYPE
ELEVATION
M9hMMg Rod2-x1T
150
Vairewd T-Arm(1)(T-Mobile)
130
(5) X cep.185(Ver )
150
Valmant T-km(1)(T-Wblle)
130
(5)X/CAPAfiS(Valmnl
150
Valmont T-Ami(1)(T-Mobile)
130
(5)x7CAP-865(Vedmn)
150
(2)742365(ATn
120
PiRCD 1T ow Profile Radom
(Amen
150
(2)80 10122
(AP14117-88W19401088DIADTnIXP)
(AU)
120
CMM13011116520E2"(T-Mobile)
133
CMA-B01111652PEOd(T-6lobile)
130
(2)742-265(ATI)
120
CIVA-13011118526E"(T-Mobile)
130
BM107U(AU)
120
DB%NH-85858(T-Mobi1e)
130
800-10764(ATT)
1I
DBMH-BSB5B(T-Mobile)
130
600-10764(ATT,
120
DBMH-65659(T-Mobile)
139
Rayap DCB MB 1e8F(ATI)
120
3C-TMAT1921157B-21ArfMA)
jMobile)
130
(2)RRDS-11(elde)IATI)
120
(2)RRUS-11(side)(ATI)
1120
3PTMAT1921078-21AQMA)
(Thbbile)
130
(2) RRUB-11 (side) (ATI)
120
(21 ETD819G-12UB TMA(ATI)
120
30-TMAT1921879-21ACW)
(Tllobile)
130
(2)ETD819G-121JBTMA(ATI)
120
(2)ETO819G-121JBTMA(ATT)
120
CEC1921-DF(TMobile)
im
(2)MGW5504r3C3(diplexer)(ATI)
120
CBC1921.DF(T-Wbro)
CBC1921d3F(T-Wb6a)
130
130
(2)MGW550P3C3(Gdexer)(ATI)
120
(2) FDGWW55041363(tiplexen(ATI)
120
120
RCMDC4010-1e 1 (T-MoW
130
(4) 880-1=5 RCU(ATI)
FRIG(RF Module)(T-Mablla)
130
(4)830-10025 RCU(ATI)
120
MG(RF Module) rrN bile)
I
(d)860.10025 RCU (AU)
120
FRIG(RFModule)(T-Mabile)
IM
FWTLaw Pror6e PlaUann(ATI)
120
F (RFWcWie)(T-MabBe)
is)
D¢b MounBng Pipa(Alnal)
99.8
Fxrol(RF Module)(T-Mob6e)
130
1L65913(AlRd)
99.8
MATERIAL STRENGTH
GRADE F Fu GRADE F Fu
A57265 65 ke1 Bred
TOWER DESIGN NOTES
Q1. Tower is located in Saint Lucie County, Florida.
2. Tower designed for Exposure C to the TIA-222-G Standard.
3. Tower designed for a 124 mph baste wind In accordance with the TIA-222-G Standard.
4. Deflections are based upon a 60 mph wind.
5. Tower Structure Class II.
6. Topographic Category 1 with Crest Height of 0.00 R
7. TOWER RATING: 100.3%
AXIAL
53 K
SHEA MOMENT
58 K 5894 kip-R
TORQUE 2 kip-fl
REACTIONS -124 mph WIND
CAL TROP Corporation
400 Lakeside DR, Suite 525
Miramar, FL 33027
Phone: (954) 874-7870