HomeMy WebLinkAboutFALL PROTECTION ANCHORSUHG I D H G LA B E & W53 Yates 0rivs, Buffs 200, W69t1oineter, Colorado 80031
ASSOCIATES 303.3M28M I fax 303.426.6397 I info@dhdsbs.eom
April 17, 2018
Mr. Michael Barber
Property Manager
Keystone Property Management Group
Paragon Condo SCANNED
4400 North Highway AIA St. Lucie Y h Fort Pierce, FL 34949 COun
Items) Tested: Fall Protection Anchors
Building: 4400 North Highway AIA, Fort Pierce, FL 34949
DHG Job No.: 2018-212, Task 01
Dear Mr. Barber:
As requested, on April 13, 2018, load testing of the seventeen (17) anchors located on the roof of
the referenced building was conducted. During testing, the system was observed for
unusual/excessive deflection or movement. The fall protection anchors were loaded to a specified
proof test load below. Please reference the drawing Sheet 1.0 of the anchor layout for additional
information on anchor location.
In order for the proof load testing to demonstrate compliance with OSHA specifications, the fall
protection anchor shall comply with the following;
"1926. S02(d)(15) (i) as part of complete personal fall arrest system which maintains a
safetyfactor of at least two, and"
"1926.502(d)(I6)(U) limit maximum arresting force on an employee to 1.800 pounds (8
KA9 when used with a body harness, "
The test loads were applied, sustained, and monitored for a minimum 2,500 lbs to 2,700 lbs
horizontal force for a minimum three (3) minute load duration. The test load represents an
approximate 150% proof load based upon the maximum arresting force of 1,8001bs. The specified
test load is based on the anchor being properly designed to adequately support the maximum fall
arresting force of an employee with a safety factor of 2:1 against ultimate capacity. Deflection was
observed, along with visual observation of any permanent deformation and/or damage done to the
anchor.
All anchors achieved the 2,500 lbs to 2,700 lbs proof test when the loop was tested in a direct
tension application. No permanent deformation was visually observed and the specified load value
was held for a minimum three (3) minute load duration. A picture of the fall protection anchor test
setup can be seen in Figure 1.
h
Figure 1— Fall Protection Anchor rest Setup
CONCLUSION
Based upon the load testing, visual observations, and our engineering experience with similar type
systems, DH Glabe & Associates have determined the fall protection anchors at the roof
locations outlined in this report are acceptable for use. If no significant changes or
modifications are performed, DH Glabe & Associates should be contacted to re -observe the system
prior to April 2019.
Limitations: DH Glabe & Associates cannot assume liability from any damage associated with unknown conditions
which were notrevealed during testing ofthe fall protection anchor system. Please call with any questions or concerns.
This report does not relieve the user from complying with all relevant OSHA standards and regulations.
Thank you for this opportunity to provide our services.
Respectfully Submitted,
DH GLABE & ASSOCIATES
Shaddi Assad, PE
Engineer III
D2018, DH GLABE & ASSOCIATES
Attachments: 1. Sheet 1.0 — Roof Anchor Layout
4400 N Hwy A1A, Fort Pierce, Fl. 34949 0140
Dates April 17, 2018
Reviewed by:
O 'V�Sc�
No 74094
Donald McCuskey, PE
Director of Engineering
Root Anchor I est
Papi