HomeMy WebLinkAboutInformal Packet - 1/13/2026
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
AGENDA
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
BOCC Informal Meeting
Tuesday, January 13, 2026
9:00 AM
Commission Chambers
2300 Virginia Avenue
3rd Floor of Roger Poitras Building
Fort Pierce, FL 34982
BOARD MEMBERS
District No. 4, Chair
JAMIE FOWLER
District No. 2, Vice-Chair
LARRY LEET
District No. 1
JAMES CLASBY
District No. 3
ERIN LOWRY
District No. 5
CATHY TOWNSEND
Mission Statement
Committed To Service, Focused On Our Future, Grounded By Tradition
*Final on 1/7
Page 1 of 35
BOCC Informal Meeting Tuesday, January 13, 2026 9:00 AM
2 | P a g e
1. CALL TO ORDER - JAMIE FOWLER, CHAIR BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3. DISCUSSION ITEMS
A. Reserves and FY 2027 Budget Outlook
B. Beach Discussion
4. COMMISSIONER COMMENTS
5. ADJOURNMENT
NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the
Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in.
Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon
request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Human
Resources Department at (772) 462-1546, humanresources@stlucieco.org or TDD (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the
meeting.
Page 2 of 35
INFORMAL ITEM
REQUEST
DATE: 1/13/2026
TO: Board of County Commissioners
PRESENTED BY: Jennifer Hill, Office of Management & Budget Director
Jennifer Garrity, Budget Manager
SUBJECT: Reserves and FY 2027 Budget Outlook
BACKGROUND:
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) will present fiscal outlook data related to the FY 2027 County
Budget and the County's reserve policies while obtaining preliminary guidance from the Board in order to
engage in setting budget guidelines desired by the BOCC as departments submit their budget requests.
Guidance from the BOCC will help the OMB and County Administrator review departmental requests, identify
issues/topics for consideration, and develop the budget in consideration of a BOCC millage target. The
guidance will allow the County Administrator to prepare a fiscally responsible budget recommendation in
consideration of economic factors resulting in upward financial pressures and operational service demand
increases.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
BOARD DIRECTION:
Staff will provide data and obtain general, preliminary guidance from the Board for the preparation of the FY
2027 Budget.
Page 3 of 35
1
Page 4 of 35
2
•Reserves
•Reasons Reserves Needed
•GFOA Reserve Recommendations
•Comparisons
•FY 27 Budget Outlook
•Strategic Plan Alignment
•Financial Review & Economic Forecast
•Challenges & Considerations
•FY 27 Calendar
Page 5 of 35
3
Page 6 of 35
4
•Debt Ratings: Strong reserves can contribute to high credit ratings which reduce the cost of
borrowing for County projects.
•Cash flow: In the beginning of the fiscal year, approximately $50 million in cash is needed to
support operations before property tax revenue starts coming in.
•Fluctuations in revenue: Changes in the economy, interest rates, and other factors can have
negative impacts on our revenue collections which could result in budgetary shortfalls.
•Emergencies: The County’s expenses for the 2004 Hurricanes (Frances and Jeanne),
exceeded $100 million. While most of this was eventually reimbursed by FEMA, Insurance,
FHWA, etc. The County had to pay the expenses up front. Not all expenses are
reimbursable and if they are, reimbursement can sometimes take over a year to receive.
•Covering temporary County needs until alternatives can be found such as the purchase of
property from Tropicana and the Liberty Medical Building.
Page 7 of 35
5
•Moody’s:
•Economy/Tax Base 30%
•Finances 30%
•Management 20%
•Debt/Pensions 20%
•Standard and Poor’s (S&P):
•Economy 20%
•Financial Performance 20%
•Reserves and Liquidity 20%
•Management 20%
•Debt and Liabilities 20%
Page 8 of 35
6
•St. Lucie County has an estimated $144 million in outstanding debt obligations.
•St. Lucie County has strong credit ratings:
•Moody’s: Aa2
•“Judged to be of high quality and are subject to very low credit risk”
•Standard and Poor’s (S&P): AA
•“Very strong capacity to meet financial commitments.”
Page 9 of 35
7
•General Fund/Fine & Forfeiture Fund
•Target: 25% of budget
•Excess reserves transferred to capital improvements, capital facilities, capital
maintenance
•Other County Funds
•Various reserve levels based on funding availability with no established
minimum threshold.
•Mosquito Control Fund: $4 million target
•Capital Funds (Impact Fees, Infrastructure Surtax, County Capital, Campus):
Funding available for year 2-5 of the CIP is budgeted in reserves and allocated
in future years’ budgets.
Page 10 of 35
8
•Martin County: Estimated 35% General Fund Total
•Designated Reserves
•Budget Stabilization Reserve: 10%
•Separate funds will be appropriated to mitigate natural disasters.
•Other operating funds will strive to maintain similar designated reserves
•Undesignated Reserves
•Will be limited to an amount that is consistent with previous years (approximately 25%)
•Indian River County: Estimated 30% General Fund Total
•Emergency and Disaster Relief Reserve: 5%
•Budget Stabilization Reserve : No less than 5%
•Unassigned Fund Balance: 20%
•Okeechobee County: 25%
Page 11 of 35
9
Page 12 of 35
10
Risk Factors:
•Extreme Events
•Revenue Stability
•Expenditure Volatility
•Leverage
•Liquidity
•Other Funds (that rely on General Fund)
•Growth
•Capital Projects
Guidance:
•Minimal Risk: 16.6%
•Low to Moderate Risk: 17-25%
•Moderate to High Risk: 26-35%
•High Risk: >35%
Page 13 of 35
11
Clerk CBC
Extreme Events 5 5 5=Very Important
Revenue Stability 4 5 4=Important
Expenditure Volatility 5 4 3=Neutral
Leverage 3 5 2=Unimportant
Liquidity 4 5 1=Very Unimportant
Other Funds 3 4
Growth 4 5
Capital Projects 5 3
Subtotal 33 36
Government Size -4 -4
Budget Practices 0 0
Borrowing Capacity -2 -2
Net 27 30
Page 14 of 35
12
Your Score Analytical Guidance
8 - 16 You face minimal risk to retain through reserves. Consider a target equal to the GFOA minimum recommended
reserve of 16.6% of revenues/expenditures.
17-24 You face a low to moderate level of risk to retain through reserves. Consider adopting a reserve target somewhat
higher than the GFOA minimum (e.g. 17-25% of revenues/expenditures). Since risk is low, do not invest excessive analytical
effort in determining an exact target amount. Consider a short, informal benchmarking study with peer agencies to provide
guidance.
25-31 You face a moderate to high level of risk to retain through reserves. Consider adopting a target amount of reserves
significantly higher than the GFOA recommended minimum (e.g., 26 -35%). Consider a short, informal benchmarking survey
as a starting point, but then analyze your most significant risk factors to make sure they are adequately covered by what the
survey suggests is reasonable.
32 - 40 You face a high level of risk to retain through reserves. Consider adopting a much higher target than the GFOA
minimum (e.g., greater than 35%). Consider performing a more in-depth analysis of the risks you face to arrive at target level
of reserved that provides sufficient coverage.
Page 15 of 35
13
•Consider increasing General Fund/Fine & Forfeiture Fund target to 30% consistent
with CBC assessment & Clerk of Court assessment of GFOA Reserve
Recommendations and surrounding Counties policies.
•Begin to establish minimum thresholds for other County funds.
Page 16 of 35
14
Page 17 of 35
Strategic Plan Alignment
Financial Review &
Economic Forecast
15
Challenges and Considerations
FY 2027 Calendar
Page 18 of 35
16
Page 19 of 35
•Urban Service Boundary Planning Studies
•Stormwater Master Plan
•Resiliency Plan
•Mobility Infrastructure Plan/ROW
Protection Map Update
•Facilities Master Plan
•Solid Waste- Cell V and exploration of
Waste to Energy
17
•Strategic Plan
•Infrastructure Surtax Process
•Port Master Plan
•Parks Master Plan
•Utilities Master Plan
•Evaluation & Appraisal Review
of the Comprehensive Plan
Page 20 of 35
18
Page 21 of 35
19
Page 22 of 35
20
State Revenue Sharing Proceeds Half-Cent Sales Tax Infrastructure Sales Tax Tourist Development Tax County Gas Tax Combined
FY23 $8,537,505 $15,348,736 $15,250,290 $6,749,305 $10,109,829
FY24 $8,238,543 $14,982,104 $15,614,489 $6,148,354 $10,077,266
FY25 $8,547,978 $14,880,841 $16,447,514 $6,707,683 $10,144,345
% Change 0.1%-3.0%7.9%-0.6%0.3%
$0
$2,000,000
$4,000,000
$6,000,000
$8,000,000
$10,000,000
$12,000,000
$14,000,000
$16,000,000
$18,000,000
FY 23 - FY 25 Actual - % Change FY 23 - FY25
Page 23 of 35
21
Page 24 of 35
22
Page 25 of 35
23
Page 26 of 35
24
•As of 1/5/26, approximately 32 bills have been filed that would affect
property taxes (expect more to be filed).
•Many of these bills would significantly limit St. Lucie County’s ability to
collect property taxes to support the budget. Some features of these bills
include:
•Prohibition of reductions in local law enforcement funding
•No provisions for replacement revenues
•A significant portion of the property taxes SLC BOCC collects goes to fund
other agencies as mandated by the State. This leaves limited funding
available for BOCC operations.
Page 27 of 35
25
Bill Description 1st Year Recurring
(6th Year)
HJR 201 Elimination of non-school homestead $202,890,986 $286,446,501
HJR 205 Non-school homestead elimination for seniors over 65+$85,814,569 $121,155,126
HJR 211 Eliminate Save-Our-Homes Portability Cap for non-school
homestead
$807,659 $6,510,381
HJR 209 Additional 100,000* exemption for insured properties on non-
school homestead value
$63,867,028 $89,863,814
HJR 203 10-year sunset of non-school homestead taxes $84,722,424 $246,480,182
HJR 207 Additional 25% exemption for non-school homestead taxes $51,464,279 $72,658,540
HJR 213 Modifications to the assessed value growth rates $12,483,380 $61,545,476
HB 215 Combined Save-Our-Homes differential for married couples $502,933 $1,297,817
Source: Florida Association of Counties/State of Florida Revenue Estimating Conference
*Amended to $200,000. Calculations reflect original $100,000 version.
Page 28 of 35
26
• HJR 787- County and School District Ad Valorem Taxing Authority-
proposes a constitutional amendment to eliminate the authority of Florida
counties and school districts to levy ad valorem property taxes, leaving only
municipalities and special districts with this taxing power.
•HB 789- Ad Valorem Tax Levies - eliminates county and school district ad
valorem (property) tax levies for general and school purposes in Florida,
shifting funding responsibilities to the state and special districts, and will
take effect only if a related constitutional amendment is approved by voters.
Page 29 of 35
27
With significant
projected
growth over
the next 20-30
years, the
County needs
to be preparing
for the
infrastructure
needed to
support a
growing
community.
Source: University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) Population Estimates Page 30 of 35
28
With a projected population of over 600,000 living in St. Lucie in the
next 30 years, we need to be thinking about:
•Water Quality
•Public Health
•Resilient Infrastructure
•Affordable/Workforce Housing
•Advancing Economic Opportunities
•County Facility needs
•Balancing the impacts of development
•Preservation of natural resources
•Waste management
•Parks/recreational facilities/trails
•Homelessness
•Efficient Transportation & Transit
•Education & Workforce development
•Fiscal responsibility & Economic
stability
•Technology advances & cybersecurity
•Preparedness & Public Safety
•Quality of life
Page 31 of 35
29
•Based on Feedback received during the FY 26 Budget Process, the following are being
implemented for the FY 27 Budget Process:
•CBC Subcommittee: In line with the duties identified in BOCC Resolution 91-221
that established the CBC and direction from the BOCC, the CBC has formed a
Subcommittee that will be reviewing the Environmental Resources Department
Budget and Operations in detail.
•July Budget Workshops to be held in the BOCC Chambers.
•Line-Item Budgets will be discussed during these workshops.
Page 32 of 35
January CIP/
Operating
Budget Kickoff
Due February
April Admin.
Budget
Reviews
April-June
Const.
Budgets,
Judicial
Agencies
submit
budgets
May/June
Admin.
Develops
recommendati
ons
Page 33 of 35
June 26:
County
Admin.
Recd.
Budget
Distributed
to Board
July 8-15:
BOCC Budget
Workshops
July 21:
TRIM
Millage
Rates
Approved
Sept. 3:
Tentative
Millage
Rates and
Tentative
Budget
Approved
Sept. 17:
Adopt Final
Millage
Rates and
Budget
Page 34 of 35
32
Page 35 of 35