Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
Home
My WebLink
About
Agenda Packet 02.01.2022
91�0 LUC�L� __ - - L11(1 a (D �acQoora� BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA ST. LUCIE COUNTY Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 1, 2022 6:00 PM St. Lucie County Commission Chambers 2300 Virginia Avenue 3rd Floor of Roger Poitras Building Fort Pierce, FL 34982 BOARD MEMBERS District No. 2, Chair SEAN MITCHELL District No. 4, Vice -Chair FRANNIE HUTCHINSON District No. 1 CHRIS DZADOVSKY District No. 3 LINDA BARTZ District No. 5 CATHY TOWNSEND Mission Statement St. Lucie Works to deliver superior service that enhances our quality of life Page 1 of 381 Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 1, 2022 6:00 PM WELCOME All meetings are televised. All meetings provided with wireless internet access for public convenience. Please turn off all cell phones and pagers prior to entering the commission chambers. Please mute the volume on all laptops and PDAs while in use in the commission chambers. GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES — Attached is the agenda, which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting. INVOCATION -PLEDGE — To bring order and decorum to its meeting, the Board begins its meetings with an invocation followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. Participation is voluntary. CONSENT AGENDA — These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA — Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items, which the Commission will discuss individually, usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS — These items are usually heard on the first Tuesdays at 6 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on the third Tuesday, which begins at 9 a.m., then public hearings will be heard at 9 a.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chair will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes, and must be pertinent to the agenda item being considered by the Board. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chair will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION — Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON -AGENDA ITEMS — These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT — Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to three minutes. Comments may pertain to any matter related to the Board's duties as the County's governing body. Comments in support or opposition to candidates for public office are not pertinent to the Board's duties. This includes any speaker identifying himself or herself as a candidate for public office. DECORUM — Please be respectful of others' opinions. MEETINGS — All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first Tuesdays of each month at 6 p.m. and on the third Tuesdays at 9 a.m., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Fort Pierce, Fla. 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 772-462-1777 or TDD 772-462-1428 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. 21Page Page 2 of 381 Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 1, 2022 6:00 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER 2. INVOCATION 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. PUBLIC COMMENT (excluding Public Hearing Items) 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Board of County Commissioners minutes for the BOCC Regular Meeting of January 11, 2022. B. Board of County Commissioners minutes for the BOCC Informal Meeting of January 11, 2022. C. Board of County Commissioners minutes for the BOCC Special Informal Meeting of January 11, 2022. 6. PROCLAMATIONS APPROVAL A. Resolution No. 22-012 - Proclaiming the month of February 2022 as "2-1-1 Awareness Month" in St. Lucie County, Florida B. Resolution No. 22-017 - Recognizing the Month of February 2022 as "National African American/Black History Month" in St. Lucie County, Florida C. Resolution No. 22-019 - Resolution Honoring the Fort Pierce Firehawks Pop Warner Football National Champions and Congratulating the Players, Coaches, Parents, and Family on this Historic Accomplishment 7. PRESENTATIONS There are no items scheduled. 8. CONSENT AGENDA A. ADMINISTRATION 31Page Page 3 of 381 Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 1, 2022 6:00 PM Grant Acceptance: Federal Aviation Administration - Airport Rescue Grant No. 3-12-0023-039- 2022 for Treasure Coast International Airport - THIS ITEM IS RELATED TO THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN Staff recommends Board acceptance of Federal Aviation Administration - Airport Rescue Grant No. 3-12-0023-039-2022 for Treasure Coast International Airport in the amount of $59,000.00 for reimbursement of airport operations under the American Rescue Plan Act and authorization the Chair to sign these grant documents as approved by the County Attorney. B. COUNTY ATTORNEY Contract for Sale and Purchase - Harmony Heights Stormwater Improvements - Alemu Real Estate Holding LLC - Parcel ID 1431-801-0074-000-5 and 1431-701-0074-000-8 Staff recommends the Board approve the contract for sale and purchase from Alemu Real Estate Holding LLC, authorize the Chair to sign the contract, direct staff to proceed with the closing and record the warranty deed in the public records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 2. Harbor Town Marina Dredging Agreement Staff recommends Board approval of the attached agreement with Harbor Town Marina to allow for use of the Taylor Creek Dredging permits; and authorization for the Chair to sign documents as approved by the County Attorney. 3. Proof of Publication and Certified Minutes of Notice of Change to County Commission District Boundaries Staff recommends the Board approve including the proof of publications in the board minutes. C. FACILITIES Bid Award - Bid No. 21-091; Maintenance and Repair Services for County Fleet Vehicles Staff recommends Board approval to award Bid No. 21-091, Maintenance and Repair Services for the County Fleet Vehicles to JW Automotive of Fort Pierce and St. Lucie Battery & Tire of Fort Pierce for an initial term of two years and two 1-year renewal options, authorize the Chair to sign the contracts as approved by the County Attorney. D. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY 41 Page 4 of 381 Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 1, 2022 6:00 PM Compuquip Technologies Agreement for Security Equipment Purchase with Three Years of Support Staff recommends Board approval of the agreement with Compuquip Technologies for the purchase of Checkpoint Security Gateways with three years of maintenance support and authorization for the Chair to sign documents as approved by the County Attorney. Interlocal Agreement between the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County and the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit for the Lease of Server Rack Space at the Information Technology Facility located at 101 North Rock Road Staff recommends Board approval of the Interlocal agreement between the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County and the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit for the Lease of Server Rack Space at the Information Technology Facility located at 101 North Rock Road and authorize the Chair to sign documents approved by the County Attorney. E. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Request Permission to Advertise a Hearing to Consider the Historical Commission's Recommendation on the Designation of Property at 9809 S. Indian River Drive Staff recommends permission to advertise a final Designation Hearing for 9809 S. Indian River Drive for the March 15, 2022 Board of County Commissioners' Meeting, at 6:00 p.m., or soon thereafter as may be heard. PUBLIC UTILITIES 1. Bid Waiver and Capital Equipment Purchase - Two eFactor3 Metso Waste Shredders St. Lucie County Solid Waste (SLCSW) requests a bid waiver per Section 8.1 (a) (3) of the purchasing manual to purchase two used Metso eFactor3 Waste Shredders (cost reduced on unit 1 by $83,839.00 because it has 721 hours and cost reduced on unit 2 by $103,841.00 because it has 1,732 hours). This would allow SLCSW to mulch yard waste and garbage in- house. SLCSW expended $671,561.72 in FY 19-20 and $502,424.51 in FY 20-21 for an outside vendor to mulch yard waste. A waste -shredder would eliminate the need for an outside vendor. A second waste shredder would allow SLCSW to shred garbage. Based on a four - month period of demonstrations, this would result in smaller, denser bales and increase garbage bale weights by an average of 1,000 pounds. This translates to 3 bales of shredded garbage for every 4 bales of un-shredded garbage. This is an airspace savings, increasing the life of the SLC Landfill. Staff recommends the Board authorize staff to purchase the two used eFactor3 Metso Waste S1Page Page 5 of 381 Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 1, 2022 6:00 PM Shredders and one cutting table for a total cost of $1,549,151.00 2. Utilities Division Purchase of Vehicles Staff recommends the Board approve the proposed purchase of new vehicles and capital expenditure in the amount of $143,418.00. G. PUBLIC WORKS Commons at Oleander - Payment In Lieu of Sidewalk Construction Staff recommends Board approval of the fee -in -lieu of construction agreement with Florida Treasure Coast Holdings, LLC, accept funds in the amount of $2,436.00 and authorization for the Chair to sign documents as approved by the County Attorney. 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1. Seaside (Ouanalao) Resort - Major Adjustment to Conditional Use Permit - THIS ITEM IS QUASI-JUDICIAL Staff recommends the Board adopt the attached resolution approving this request for a major adjustment to the conditional use permit, subject to the conditions outlined in Resolution No. 2022-23. 2. Staff Initiated Text Amendment to the Land Development Code to Establish Stormwater Design Standards for Single-family and Duplex Infill Development - 2nd Reading of the Ordinance Staff recommends the Board approve the second reading of the ordinance to establish stormwater grading requirements for infill of single-family and duplex development. 10. REGULAR AGENDA A. COUNTY ATTORNEY Opioid Litigation - Proposed Settlements with Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., ("Endo")(collectively, "Settling Defendants") 61Page Page 6 of 381 Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 1, 2022 6:00 PM Staff recommends that the Board approve the proposed participation agreement and authorize the Chair and County Attorney to cosign the agreement. B. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES Request Permission to Advertise a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Expand the Urban Services Boundary and Update Associated Goals, Policies and Objectives Essential to Plan for the Expansion Staff recommends permission to advertise the proposed ordinance for the first of three public hearings, with the first hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission projected on February 17, 2022 or March 17, 2022 at 6:00 p.m., or soon thereafter as may be heard. 11. ANNOUNCEMENTS A. The Board of County Commissioners will hold an Informal meeting on Tuesday, February 8, 2022 at 9am in the Commission Chambers of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex located at 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL. B. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Regular meeting on Tuesday, February 15, 2022 at 9am in the Commission Chambers of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex located at 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL. C. County offices will be closed on Monday, February 21, 2022 in observance of Presidents' Day. D. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Special meeting on Tuesday, February 22, 2022 at 9am in the Commission Chambers of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex located at 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL. 12. MOTION TO ADJOURN 71Page Page 7 of 381 91rc LUCE (D 0'�) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Regular Meeting January 11, 2022 Convened: 6:00 PM Adjourned: 8:10 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM by Chair Sean Mitchell, District No. 2. Present Commissioner Sean Mitchell District 2, Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson District 4, Commissioner Chris Dzadovsky District 1, Commissioner Linda Bartz District 3, Commissioner Cathy Townsend District 5 Also Present Howard Tipton, County Administrator Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator Alphonso Jefferson, Deputy County Administrator Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Katherine Barbieri, Asst. County Attorney Linda Pendarvis, Planning & Development ServicesPlanning Manager Patrick Dayan, Water Quality Division Manager Monica Graziani, Planning & Development Services Building & Code Regulation Manager Don West, Public Works Director Jodi Nentwick-Kugler, Planning & Development Services Senior Planner Kori Benton, Planning & Development Services Assistant Planning Manager Matt Baum, Interim Parks & Recreation Director Leslie Olson, Planning & Dev. Services Director Vera Smith, Deputy Clerk Recording Secretary 2. INVOCATION The County Administrator led the invocation. 3. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 4. PUBLIC COMMENT (excluding Public Hearing Items) Chair Mitchell opened the meeting for public comment at this time. With no one wishing to address the Board, Chair Mitchell closed public comment. Page 8 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM 5. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion was made to approve all minute sets, and it passed unanimously. RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commissioner District 3 Linda Bartz SECONDER: Commissioner District 4 Frannie Hutchinson Sean Mitchell, Frannie Hutchinson, Chris Dzadovsky, Linda Bartz, Cathy AYES: Townsend NAYS: None EXCUSED: None A. Board of County Commissioners minutes for the BOCC Regular Meeting of December 7, 2021. B. Board of County Commissioners minutes for the BOCC Regular Meeting of December 14, 2021. C. Board of County Commissioners minutes for the BOCC Informal Meeting of December 14, 2021. 6. PROCLAMATIONS APPROVAL A. Resolution No. 22-011 - Proclaiming January 17, 2022, as "Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Day" in St. Lucie County, Florida - ADD ON The deputy clerk read the proclamation into the record. A motion was made to adopt the resolution, and it passed unanimously. Chair Mitchell presented the proclamation to the " Martin Luther King Jr." Commemorative Committee Chair Diane Williams Johnson and Larryton McNealy, who thanked the Board and accepted the proclamation. RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commissioner District 3 Linda Bartz SECONDER: Commissioner District 1 Chris Dzadovsky AYES: Sean Mitchell, Frannie Hutchinson, Chris Dzadovsky, Linda Bartz, Cathy Townsend NAYS: None EXCUSED: None 21 Page 9 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM 7. PRESENTATIONS A. Check Presentation for Veterans Homeless Project Wayne Teegardin of the St. Lucie County Veterans Service and several retired veterans presented an $11,000.00 check to the Homeless Veterans Project. Jose Capellan, the County Veteran Service Office Manager, accepted the check. The St. Lucie County Veteran Service's mission is to serve Veterans of America and their families with compassion and be their principal advocate to ensure that they receive the support and recognition earned in service to the nation. 8. CONSENT AGENDA A motion was made to adopt the consent agenda, and it passed unanimously. RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commissioner District 5 Cathy Townsend SECONDER: Commissioner District 3 Linda Bartz Sean Mitchell, Frannie Hutchinson, Chris Dzadovsky, Linda Bartz, Cathy AYES: Townsend NAYS: None EXCUSED: None A. WARRANTS 1. Warrant Lists 10 - 12 Adopted by Consent Vote B. ADMINISTRATION 1. Ratification of Task Force Members for One St. Lucie Community Homelessness Task Force Staff recommended ratification of appointments from the cities of Port St. Lucie and Fort Pierce. - City of Port Saint Lucie City Council Member - Anthony Bonna - City of Fort Pierce City Commission Member - Arnold S. Gaines Adopted by Consent Vote C. COUNTY ATTORNEY 1. Permission to Advertise a Public Hearing, pursuant to Appendix A -Local Acts, Article VII, Division 2 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws, to approve an 3 1 PagE Page 10 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM Order to demolish an unsafe structure located at 3019 McNeil Road, Fort Pierce, FL Staff recommended, under the provisions of Section 7-42, Appendix A -Local Acts Article VII, Division 2 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws, that the Board accept the Certified Reports of Inspection of Building for filing, declare the building to be unsafe, authorize staff to order title work and order that a public hearing be held so that the Board may take such further action, as it is appropriate, with regard to the unsafe building located at 3019 McNeil Road, Fort Pierce, Florida. Adopted by Consent Vote Permission to Advertise a Public Hearing, pursuant to Appendix A -Local Acts, Article VII, Division 2 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws, to approve an Order to demolish an unsafe structure located at 13179 S. Indian River Drive (east side of the road), Jensen Beach, FL. Staff recommended, under the provisions of Section 7-42, Appendix A -Local Acts Article VII, Division 2 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws, that the Board accept the Certified Reports of Inspection of Building for filing, declare the building to be unsafe, authorize staff to order title work and order that a public hearing be held so that the Board may take such further action, as it is appropriate, with regard to the unsafe building located at 13179 S. Indian River Drive (east side of the road), Jensen Beach, Florida. Adopted by Consent Vote 3. Permission to Advertise a Public Hearing, pursuant to Appendix A -Local Acts, Article VII, Division 2 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws, to approve an Order to demolish an unsafe structure located at 1802 Angle Road, Fort Pierce, FL Staff recommended, under the provisions of Section 7-42, Appendix A -Local Acts Article VII, Division 2 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws, that the Board accept the Certified Reports of Inspection of Building for filing, declare the building to be unsafe, authorize staff to order title work and order that a public hearing be held so that the Board may take such further action, as it is appropriate, with regard to the unsafe building located at 1802 Angle Road, Fort Pierce, Florida. Adopted by Consent Vote 4. Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement - ACCEL International Holdings, Inc. - First Amendment to JGIG 21-003 Staff recommended the Board approve the proposed First Amendment Job Growth Incentive Grant (JGIG) Agreement with ACCEL International Holdings, Inc., and authorize the Chair to sign the first amendment. Adopted by Consent Vote 4 1 PagE Page 11 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM 5. St. Lucie County Health Department - Fiscal Year 2021-22 Contract - Amendment to Contract - Purchase of Vehicles Staff recommended the Board approve the proposed purchase of vehicles in the amount of $239,377.00 and the corresponding reduction of $239,377.00 in the County's contribution to Fiscal Year 2021-22 contract with the Florida Department of Health. Adopted by Consent Vote 6. Resolution No. 2022-9 - Allowing the Drug Abuse Treatment Assn., Inc., a Not for Profit Corporation, the Continued Use of Space at 4590 Selvitz Road to Provide Shelter and Care for Dependent Children and Children Awaiting Dependency Adjudication Staff recommended the Board adopt the proposed resolution authorizing DATA's continued use of the facilities through and including June 30, 2024, and authorize the Chair to sign the fifteenth amendment to the facilities use agreement as drafted by the County Attorney. Adopted by Consent Vote 7. Contract for Sale and Purchase - Harmony Heights Stormwater Improvements - Bruce Finney - Parcel ID 1431-703-0006-000-7 Staff recommended the Board approve the Contract for Sale and Purchase from Bruce Finney, authorize the Chair to sign the contract, direct staff to proceed with the closing, and record the warranty deed in the public records of St. Lucie County Florida. Adopted by Consent Vote 8. Grade Crossing License Agreement - Florida East Coast Railway, L.L.C. (FEC) - Edwards Road During the month of September 2017, the effects of Hurricane Irma resulted in multiple pavement failures on Edwards Road from Oleander Avenue to US-1. The excessive rainfall caused a system -wide failure that will require the reconstruction of Edwards Road and the replacement of the existing drainage system. The westbound outside travel lane is currently closed to ensure the safety of the traveling public. Construction work will be done on FEC Railroad right-of-way that will include a jack and bore installation of a 42" steel casing for a 24" RCP storm drain and directional drilling operation to install conduits for future County fiber infrastructure. The FEC requires the existing License Agreement be amended for the installation of new infrastructure in their right-of-way. Staff recommended that the Board approve the license agreement with Florida East Coast Railway, L.L.C. (FEC), authorize the Chair to sign the agreement, direct staff to return the agreement to FEC for signature and record in the public records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Adopted by Consent Vote 5 1 PagE Page 12 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM 9. Revocable License Agreement - 180 SE Bonita Court - River Park - Unit 5 - Carlos R. Fernandez, Isabel F. Gonzalez and Yean Carlos Fernandez - Parcel ID 3419-540-0302-000-1 Yean Fernandez is requesting a Revocable License Agreement to be allowed to install a 6' wood fence along the west side of his property within the County's 6' Drainage/Utility Easement, and a 6' wood fence along the south side of his property within the County's 10' Drainage/Utility Easement, per the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants recorded in Deed Book 247 Page 37. He understands if the County Engineer determines the fence is causing flooding, drainage problems, or for other needs in the area, the fence will need to be removed or relocated at his expense. Engineering, Road & Bridge, and Water Quality have reviewed the License Agreement and have no objections. Carlos R. Fernandez passed away on October 21, 2021. Yean Fernandez provided a death certificate in lieu of a signature to the Property Acquisition Division. Staff recommended the Board approve the revocable license agreement, authorize the Chair to sign the agreement, and direct Yean Fernandez pay to record the agreement in the public records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Adopted by Consent Vote 10. Revocable License Agreement - 3712 Tanager Place - Estates of Longwood - Edmond Warren Alonzo III and Katharine Anne Alonzo - Parcel ID 2433-502-0020-000-3 Mr. Alonzo is requesting a Revocable License Agreement to be allowed to install a 6' PVC fence with gate along the southeast side of the property, within the County's 7.5' Drainage Easement, and a 6' PVC fence along the northeast side of the property, extending into the County's 7.5' Drainage Easement, per the Estates of Longwood Subdivision Plat, recorded in Plat Book 26, Page 27. The fence and gate must be placed a minimum of 2' off the centerline of the existing concrete pipe. The Owners have requested that any existing landscaping and irrigation be allowed to remain in the 7.5' Drainage Easement. He understands if the County Engineer determines the fence, gate, landscaping, or irrigation is causing flooding, drainage problems or for other needs in the area, the fence, gate, landscaping, and irrigation will need to be removed or relocated at his expense. Engineering, Road & Bridge, and Water Quality have reviewed the License Agreement and have no objections. Staff recommended the Board approve the revocable license agreement, authorize the Chair to sign the agreement and direct Mr. Alonzo pay to record the agreement in the public records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 61Page Page 13 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM Adopted by Consent Vote D. FACILITIES 1. Funding Request - St. Lucie County Downtown Court Complex Second Floor Building C Interior Improvements Staff recommended Board approval for the improvement of St. Lucie County Downtown Court Complex Second floor Building C in the amount of $515,000.00 and allocations of funds for utilization. Adopted by Consent Vote 2. Bid Award - Bid No. 21-054; Security Infrastructure & Support Services for Various County Buildings This item is the bid award for security infrastructure and support services at St. Lucie County Courthouse Complex Buildings A, B, & C, and St. Lucie West Annex. Staff recommended Board approval to award Bid No. 21-054 Security Infrastructure & Support Services for Various County Buildings to TRIAD Security Group, Inc. in the amount of $31,620.00 per year for an initial term of three years and two 1-year renewal options, authorize the Chair to sign the contract as approved by the County Attorney. Adopted by Consent Vote E. OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET 1. Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 21-083, Professional Engineering Services - Design and Permitting of Water & Wastewater Projects Staff recommended Board approval of the short-listed firms for RFQ No. 21-083 and permission to: • Conduct contract negotiations with short-listed firms; • If negotiations are successful, award contracts to the successful short-listed firms and authorization for the Chairman to sign the documents as prepared by the County Attorney. Adopted by Consent Vote 2. Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 21-084, Professional Construction Engineering Inspection Services for Water & Wastewater Projects Staff recommended Board approval of the short-listed firms for RFQ No. 21-084 and 71Page Page 14 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM permission to: • Conduct contract negotiations with short-listed firms; • If negotiations are successful, award contracts to the successful short-listed firms and authorization for the Chairman to sign the documents as prepared by the County Attorney. Adopted by Consent Vote 3. Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 21-086, Professional Engineering Services - Stormwater Master Plan Modeling and Design Staff recommended Board approval of the short-listed firms and permission to: • Conduct discussions/presentations with short-listed firms; • Conduct contract negotiations with the successful short-listed firm; • If negotiations are successful, award the contract to the successful short-listed firm and authorization for the Chairman to sign the documents as prepared by the County Attorney. Adopted by Consent Vote 4. Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 21-087, Professional Engineering Services - Engineering, Design, and Permitting for Harmony Heights Subdivision. Staff recommended Board approval of the short-listed firms for RFQ No. 21-087 and permission to: • Conduct discussions/presentations with short-listed firms; • Conduct contract negotiations with successful short-listed firm; • If negotiations are successful, award the contract to the successful short-listed firm and authorization for the Chairman to sign the documents as prepared by the County Attorney. Adopted by Consent Vote 5. Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 21-089, Professional Engineering Services - Sunland Garden Subdivision Stormwater Master Plan Staff recommended Board approval of the short-listed firms for RFQ No. 21-089 and permission to: • Conduct discussions/presentations with short-listed firms; gl Page 15 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM • Conduct contract negotiations with the successful short-listed firm; • If negotiations are successful, award the contract to the successful short-listed firm and authorization for the Chairman to sign the documents as prepared by the County Attorney. Adopted by Consent Vote 6. Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 21-092, Professional Engineering Services - Restoration of Ten Mile Creek at George LeStrange Preserve Staff recommended Board approval of the short-listed firms for RFQ No. 21-092 and permission to: • Conduct discussions/presentations with short-listed firms; • Conduct contract negotiations with the successful short-listed firm; • If negotiations are successful, award contract to the successful short-listed firm and authorization for the Chairman to sign the documents as prepared by the County Attorney. Adopted by Consent Vote 7. Request for Qualifications (RFQ) No. 21-090, Professional Engineering Services - Engineering, Design & Permitting for Water Quality Improvement Projects for River Park Subdivision Staff recommended Board approval of the short-listed firms for RFQ No. 21-090 and permission to: • Conduct discussions/presentations with short-listed firms; • Conduct contract negotiations with the successful short-listed firm; • If negotiations are successful, award contract to the successful short-listed firm and authorization for the Chairman to sign the documents as prepared by the County Attorney. Adopted by Consent Vote 8. Award of Bid No. 22-011, Welding and Fabrication Services Staff recommended Board approval of the award of Bid No. 22-011, Welding and Fabrication Services to Custom Welding Diversified of Port St. Lucie, Loidl Enterprises, Inc. of Vero Beach, and Rearden Steel Manufacturing, LLC of Fort Pierce, and authorization for the Chairman to sign the contracts as approved by the County Attorney. Adopted by Consent Vote 9 1 PagE Page 16 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM F. PARKS & RECREATION 1. Waiver for the National Forum for Black Public Administrators (NFBPA), Treasure Coast Florida Chapter Inaugural Black History Month Gala - Request to Waive Facility Use Fees in the Amount of $1,830.00. Staff recommended Board approval to waive the facility use fee of $1,830.00 as outlined in this agenda memorandum and authorization for the Chair to sign documents as approved by the County Attorney. Adopted by Consent Vote 2. Waiver for the 7th Annual Fort Pierce Job Fair - Request to Waive Facility Use Fees in the Amount of $2,587.50 Staff recommended Board approval to waive the facility use fee of $2,587.50 as outlined in this agenda memorandum and authorization for the Chair to sign documents as approved by the County Attorney. Adopted by Consent Vote 3. Emergency Purchase of Lightning Detection Equipment for Parks - $72,000.00 Staff recommended the approval to purchase the Lightning Detection Systems from Earth Networks for $72,000.00, forgo the bid process as allowed by the purchasing manual, and authorization for the Chair to sign the documents as prepared by the County Attorney. Adopted by Consent Vote G. PUBLIC SAFETY 1. St. Lucie County Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity Renewal Application - MCT Express Inc. d/b/a United Medical Transportation Staff recommended the Board determine the renewal application of MCT Express Inc. d/b/a United Medical Transportation for a Class B & F Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity meets the standards of review set forth in Section 18-56, approve the application, and authorize the Chair to sign the Class B & F Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. Adopted by Consent Vote 2. St. Lucie County Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity Renewal Application - Treasure Coast Transportation Services Staff recommended the Board determine the renewal application of Treasure Coast Transportation Services for a Class F Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity meets the standards of review set forth in Section 18-56, approve the application, and authorize the 101Page Page 17 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM Chair to sign the Class F Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. Adopted by Consent Vote 3. St. Lucie County Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity Renewal Application - Skytop Transportation Inc. Staff recommended the Board determine the renewal application of Skytop Transportation Inc. for a Class F Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity meets the standards of review set forth in Section 18-56, approve the application, and authorize the Chair to sign the Class F Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. Adopted by Consent Vote 4. Hurricane Irma (DR4337) PW4257 Final Inspection Report (FIR) Staff recommended the Board to approve the Final Inspection Report (FIR) and authorize the Chair to sign the final inspection report. Adopted by Consent Vote 5. Hurricane Irma (DR4337) PW5750 Final Inspection Report FIR Staff recommended the Board to approve the Final Inspection Report (FIR) and authorize the Chair to sign the final inspection report. Adopted by Consent Vote H. PUBLIC UTILITIES 1. Bid Waiver and Sole Source Determination FY 21-22 Staff recommended Board approval of bid waiver and sole source determination for the purchase of parts, service, and supplies for the care and maintenance of the Water Treatment Plants of parts and service for various heavy and other specialized equipment from Conveyor Consulting & Rubber Corporation and authorization for the Chair to execute contracts as approved by the County Attorney. Adopted by Consent Vote 2. Award of BID #22-022 for the loading and hauling of Fill Dirt from Treasure Coast International Airport Property located on the north end of Taylor Dairy Road to the St. Lucie County Baling and Recycling Facility Staff recommended Board approval to award Bid No. 22-022 to Abercrombie Land Services and permission for the Chairman to sign the contract as approved by the County Attorney. 111Page Page 18 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM Adopted by Consent Vote I. PUBLIC WORKS 1. Bell Avenue Sidewalk from S 25th Street to Sunrise Boulevard First Amendment to Work Authorization #8 for Environmental Documentation - THIS PROJECT IS FUNDED BY THE INFRASTRUCTURE SALES TAX Staff recommended Board approval of the First Amendment to Work Authorization No, 8 in the amount of $13,050.00. For the Bell Avenue Sidewalk from S. 25th Street to Sunrise Boulevard and authorize the Chair to sign documents approved by the County Attorney. Adopted by Consent Vote 2.Oleander Avenue Sidewalk from Midway Road to South Market Avenue CEI Work Authorization - THIS PROJECT IS FUNDED BY THE INFRASTRUCTURE SALES TAX Staff recommended the Board approve the attached scope and fee proposal and work authorization from Culpepper & Terpening, Inc and increase the project budget, in the amount of $160,080.00, to perform Construction Engineering and Inspection services and federally required documentation in support of the Oleander Avenue Sidewalk project. Adopted by Consent Vote 3. Bid Award 22-014 Mellville Road Neighborhood Stormwater Improvements Phase I Construction and Delivery of Drainage Structures - THIS PROJECT IS FUNDED BY THE INFRASTRUCTURE SALES TAX Staff recommended Board approval to award Bid No. 22-014 Mellville Road Neighborhood Stormwater Improvements Phase I Construction and Delivery of Drainage Structures to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Hinterland Group, Inc in the amount of $68,849.00, and authorization for the Chair to sign documents as approved by the County Attorney. Adopted by Consent Vote 9. PUBLIC HEARINGS A. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1. Ravinia PUD (Planned Unit Development) Mining Permit Exemption application in accordance with Section 11.05.11(A.2.h) to allow for the removal of excavated material within the development to provide on -site stormwater management, infrastructure, and other features associated with the approved development. - THIS ITEM IS QUASI-JUDICIAL This public hearing was Quasi -Judicial, and the commissioners made the following 12 1 Page 19 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM disclosures regarding this item: Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson - Spoke with staff and residents, Dennis Horton, Mary Locke, Bradley Locke (email), and Ronna Perry. Commissioner Linda Bartz - Spoke with staff only. Commissioner Chris Dzadovsky - Spoke with staff, developer, and Bradley Locke (email). Commissioner Cathy Townsend - Spoke with staff and Bradley Locke (email). Chair Sean Mitchell - Spoke with staff, Bradley Locke (email), Mr. Patel, Alicia Mowers. Linda Pendarvis, Planning & Development Services Planning Manager, and Patrick Dayan, Water Quality Division Manager, presented this item to the Board. The Ravinia of Port St. Lucie, LLC filed a Mining Permit exemption request. The Ravinia Planned Unit Development consists of 54.37 acres located on the south side of West Midway Road, approximately one -quarter mile west of South 25th Street. Under the Land Development Code, the applicant is requesting an exemption from the requirement of a Mining Permit to remove excavated material from the site, derived from developing stormwater areas, infrastructure, and other features customarily associated with on -site development. A public hearing notice was placed in St. Lucie News Tribune, mail notices were sent to property owners within 500 feet of the subject, and a sign was placed on the property. On June 6, 2017, the Board of County Commissioners granted the Planned Unit Development (PUD) Site Plan approval through Resolution 2017-128 for the project known as Ravinia PUD for a 148-unit single-family residential subdivision. Any operation that entails excavating or removing earth off -site over one hundred (100) cubic yards must get a Mining Permit unless exempt under the Mining Permits Section 11.05.11(A.2) of the Land Development Code. On June 10, 2021, the site development permit was issued and approved by the County Engineer to provide for on -site stormwater management and on -site fills for roads, houses, buildings, sidewalks, driveways, parking lots, and associated on -site development. The two (2) proposed phases, (Phase 1) 59 residential units and a 4.7-acre lake (Phase II), 89 residential units, and a 5-acre lake. Approximately 14-acres of the site has been preserved in a conservation easement. To date, the applicant has satisfied the conditions of approval within the original development approval. Staff has reviewed the existing site conditions and adjacent uses and supports the applicant's request for an exemption from the Mining Permit requirements, with the following conditions of approval. • All construction vehicles' entrances should only be permitted to utilize the main construction point on W. Midway Road. • The hours of operation for construction/excavation activities should be limited from 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM Monday through Saturday. • The applicant shall complete the final grading and stabilization of the excavated areas within 30 days of completion of the excavation stage. • Removal of excavated material under this exemption shall be performed within 90 days of completion of the excavation stage. Staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as outlined in Section 11.07.03 13 1 P a g Page 20 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommended Board approval of the requested mining permit exemption, with associated conditions of approval, and authorize the Chair to sign documents as approved by the County Attorney. Chair Mitchell opened the hearing for public comment at this time. The following people addressed the Board. • Tim Harless • Ronna Perry • Janet Murray • Dennis Horton • Ray Harless • Lee Mabley • Thomas Pagnato With no one else wishing to address the Board, Chair Mitchell closed the public hearing. The Board discussed the residents' concerns regarding road damage, loaded truck routes/hours, rental units, the benefit of the exemption, fencing, negative impacts on the Wellwater filtration supply in the surrounding area, potential coding violations of the developer, and the adverse effects on nearby properties. Leslie Olson, Planning and Development Services Director, commented and advised the Land Development code only speaks on build type (multi -family duplex, townhome, single- family home). It does not state the kind of ownership if the homes are rented or sold. Commissioner Dzadovsky expressed his concern about the violation of Land Development Code 11.07.03, no adverse effects on nearby properties, and what was indicated by the surrounding residents regarding the Wellwater filtration supply concerns. The Board expressed concerns regarding the mining exemption, off -site traffic, noise, dust, and water impacts. A motion was made to defer action until all exemption impacts are covered, including the primary concern of the Wellwater filtration supply with the South Florida Water District. A motion was made to approve staff recommendation to continue the item to the March 1, 2022, Regular Meeting Agenda, and upon roll call, it passed unanimously. RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commissioner District 4 Frannie Hutchinson SECONDER: Commissioner District 3 Linda Bartz AYES: Sean Mitchell, Frannie Hutchinson, Chris Dzadovsky, Linda Bartz, Cathy Townsend 14 1 Page 21 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM NAYS: None EXCUSED: None 2. Staff Initiated Text Amendment to the Land Development Code to Establish Stormwater Design Standards for Single-family and Duplex Infill Development - THIS ITEM IS QUASI- JUDICIAL Monica Graziani, Planning & Development Services Building & Code Regulation Manager, presented this item to the Board. The purpose of the text amendment to the Land Development Code, Chapter VII, Development Design and Improvement Standards, Section 7.04.01 D.3 - Area, Yard, Height, and Open Space Requirements, Filled Lands, is to establish requirements for a stormwater grading plan for single-family and duplex infill development. Currently, applicants for infill development execute a Filled Lands Affidavit, stating the owner shall be responsible for assuring adequate drainage so the immediate community will not be adversely affected. Infill development in an established neighborhood is constructed at higher elevations than the older adjacent homes. Thus, the runoff from the infill lot impacts the neighboring properties. It is difficult for staff to address complaints from citizens affected by new infill development because there are no stormwater design standards. The proposed ordinance was drafted to provide a Do -It -Yourself method of determining the required stormwater swale for infill development of single-family and duplexes. The homeowner or contractor could prepare the stormwater grading plan without retaining the services of a design professional. The Treasure Coast Builder's Association has provided a letter of support regarding the text amendment. Also, the County's Public Works Director has reviewed the proposed text amendment and has no objections. The proposed regulations: • Limit the amount of fill placed on a site. • The finished floor shall be no greater than three feet above the crown of the road. • One-time exemption for additions or accessory structures less than 300 square feet. • The plan must include roof drainage. • The stormwater grading plan shall provide a swale design along the lot's perimeter, rear to front drainage flow. • Swales no greater than 2 feet in width. • The DIY formula is provided to determine the flow area of the swale. • Swales must be maintained. • An approved final inspection of the stormwater grading plan is required for a certificate of occupancy. Staff recommended that the Board authorize the second public hearing scheduling for the Land Development Code Text Amendment to establish a stormwater grading plan for single-family and duplex infill development on February 1, 2022, at 6:00 PM as soon 151Page Page 22 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM thereafter. Chair Mitchell opened the hearing for public comment at this time. With no one wishing to address the Board, Chair Mitchell closed the public hearing. A motion was made to approve staff recommendations, and it passed unanimously. RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commissioner District 1 Chris Dzadovsky SECONDER: Commissioner District 3 Linda Bartz AYES: Sean Mitchell, Frannie Hutchinson, Chris Dzadovsky, Linda Bartz, Cathy Townsend NAYS: None EXCUSED: None 3. Comprehensive Plan Amendment - Implementation of the 20-Year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan Jodi Nentwick-Kugler, Planning & Development Services Senior Planner, presented this item to the Board. St. Lucie County is located in the South Florid Water Management District's (SFWMD) Upper East Coast (UEC) Planning Area. The SFWMD prepared the original UEC Regional Water Supply Plan in 1998. In 2005, the Florida Legislature strengthened the requirements for water supply planning and required local governments to adopt a 10-year water supply and incorporate it into the local government's Comprehensive Plan. St. Lucie County's 10-year Water Supply Facilities Work Plan was adopted in 2008 and was subsequently updated in 2014. The Upper East Coast Water Supply Planning Area includes St. Lucie and Martin counties and the northeast portion of Okeechobee County. The Planning and Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency at their June 18, 2020 meeting, voted unanimously to recommend the proposed amendment to the Board of County Commissioners. On November 2, 2021, the Board of County Commissioners requested to continue the item to the December 7, 2021 Board of County Commissioners meeting to allow the County's Consultant CDM Smith time to update the project list within the Comprehensive Plan Amendment. Staff recommended the Board approve Ordinance No. 2022-1 to adopt the 20-Year Supply Facilities Work Plan incorporating the recently adopted South Florida Water Management District 2021 Upper East Coast Water Supply Plan. Chair Mitchell opened the hearing for public comment at this time. With no one wishing to address the Board, Chair Mitchell closed the public hearing. A motion was made to approve staff recommendations, and it passed unanimously. RESULT: APPROVE 16 1 Page 23 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM MOVER: Commissioner District 5 Cathy Townsend SECONDER: Commissioner District 4 Frannie Hutchinson AYES: Sean Mitchell, Frannie Hutchinson, Chris Dzadovsky, Linda Bartz, Cathy Townsend NAYS: None EXCUSED: None 4. Preliminary PUD Site Plan Extension Request - Sanctuary Cove Planned Unit Development - THIS ITEM IS QUASI-JUDICIAL *Commissioner Cathy Townsend abstained from commenting and voting on the item due to being a neighbor within 500 feet of the development. Kori Benton, Planning & Development Services Assistant Planning Manager, presented this item to the Board. The applicant is requesting a twelve (12) month extension to the Sanctuary Cove Preliminary PUD Site Plan that encompasses a sixty-two (62) unit residential development consisting of 25 single-family home lots & 37 two-story townhomes. The project sites are collectively 15.99 acres, located on the north side of Rouse Road, east of Old Dixie Highway, the former Rio Del Mar Mobile Home Park. Under the Land Development Code, a public hearing notice was placed in St. Lucie News Tribune on December 29, 2021, letters were mailed to property owners within a 500-foot radius, and a sign was placed on the property. The Preliminary PUD initially held an April 2, 2021 expiration date extended by the County Administrator's COVID-19 Order, 20-005 that provided a 279 day tolling period, extending the current expiration date to January 8, 2022. This extension only applied to the current Preliminary PUD Site Plan approval. In contrast, the project will require a Final PUD Site Plan approval after a public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners. The applicant has not filed this petition to date. The proposed twelve (12) month extension would provide a new expiration date of January 8, 2023. Staff recommended approval. This public hearing was Quasi -Judicial, and the commissioners made the following disclosures regarding this item: Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson - Spoke with staff only. Commissioner Linda Bartz - Spoke with staff only. Commissioner Chris Dzadovsky - Spoke with staff only. Commissioner Cathy Townsend - Abstained Chair Sean Mitchell - Spoke with staff only. Chair Mitchell opened the hearing for public comment at this time. With no one wishing to address the Board, Chair Mitchell closed the public hearing. 171Page Page 24 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM A motion was made to approve staff recommendations, and it passed unanimously. RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commissioner District 1 Chris Dzadovsky SECONDER: Commissioner District 4 Frannie Hutchinson AYES: Sean Mitchell, Frannie Hutchinson, Chris Dzadovsky, Linda Bartz, Cathy Townsend NAYS: None EXCUSED: None 5. MMR RV Park Planned Non -Residential Development (PNRD) Rezoning & Preliminary Site Plan - THIS ITEM IS QUASI-JUDICIAL The applicant is requesting to rezone a 16.97-acre parcel of land, with a current zoning designation of Commercial, General (CG) to the Planned Non -Residential Development (PNRD) Zoning District & Preliminary Site Development Plan for an eighty (80) lot recreational vehicle park, with amenities. * Item presented in conjunction with Regular Agenda 10.C.1. Jodi Nentwick-Kugler, Planning & Development Services Senior Planner, presented this item to the Board. Friends I, LLC, represented by Bradley Currie of Engineering Design & Construction Inc., applied on May 7, 2021, for a change in zoning from CG, Commercial, General to Planned NonResidential Development (PNRD), and a preliminary site plan to develop a recreational vehicle (RV) park. The project site consists of two (2) parcels outlined in red with a combined area of 16.97 acres, located at North US Hwy. 1 and Turnpike Feeder Rd., North of Kings Highway. Under the public notice requirement outlined in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, these Public Hearings were advertised in St. Lucie Tribune on Friday, November 26, 2021. In addition, notices were mailed to adjacent property owners within 500 feet of the subject properties. Two signs were placed on the subject property, one at N US Highway 1 and the second on Turnpike Feeder Road. The project, known as MMR RV Park, proposes a gated 80-site RV park with a 2,176 SF office and 2,690 SF clubhouse, with pool and associated site improvements. Conditions of approval: Before approval of the Final/Major Site Plan, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development Code, Section 7.10.24 Community Architectural Standards for the clubhouse, including a lighting and sign plan. • Recreational Vehicle (RV) sites shall be for rental only. No sale of individual sites is permitted. • The length of stay of each rental site is limited to 180 days in accordance with the Florida statute. 18 1 P a g Page 25 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM The applicant submitted a Text Amendment to the Land Development Code (LDC) to amend section 7.02.02(B) to allow Recreational Vehicle Park District use within the PNRD Zoning District. Such use and zoning can be permitted on property classified as Commercial on the County's Future Land Use Map and subject to the supplemental standards in 7.10.16 for Recreational Vehicle Parks. After public hearings with the Planning and Zoning Commission and Board of County Commissioners, the proposed LDC amendment was approved and effective on September 28, 2021. On November 18, 2021, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing and voted unanimously to forward a recommendation of approval to the Board of County Commissioners, with the staff's recommended condition of approval for the Board to consider. Staff recommended the Board approve the proposed Planned Non -Residential Development and Preliminary Site Plan known as MMR RV Park. This public hearing was Quasi -Judicial, and the commissioners made the following disclosures regarding this item: Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson - Spoke with staff only. Commissioner Linda Bartz - Spoke with staff only. Commissioner Chris Dzadovsky - Spoke with staff and applicants. Commissioner Cathy Townsend - Spoke with staff only. Chair Sean Mitchell - Spoke with staff only. Chair Mitchell opened the hearing for public comment at this time. The following people addressed the Board. • David Baggott With no one else wishing to address the Board, Chair Mitchell closed the public hearing. H IIIULIUII VVd.'j IIIdUC LU CIPPI UVC JLdll I CL.UI I II I ICI IUdLIUI I.-J, dI IU IL PCIJ.-JCU UI ICII III I IUUZly. RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commissioner District 5 Cathy Townsend SECONDER: Commissioner District 3 Linda Bartz AYES: Sean Mitchell, Frannie Hutchinson, Chris Dzadovsky, Linda Bartz, Cathy Townsend NAYS: None EXCUSED: None 19 1 Page 26 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM 10. REGULAR AGENDA A. COUNTY ATTORNEY 1. Canvassing Board — Appointment for 2022 General Elections Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney, presented this item to the Board. On November 16, 2021, Commissioner Townsend was appointed by the Board to serve as the primary member of the Canvassing Board for the 2022 elections. Commissioner Townsend has advised staff that she will be unavailable to serve. State law (Section 1902.141, Florida Statutes) provides that the County Canvassing Board comprises the supervisor of elections, a county judge, and the Chair of the Board of county commissioners. In any instance, the Chair of the Board of county commissioners cannot serve or is disqualified. The Board of county commissioners must appoint, as a substitute member, one of its members who is not a candidate in opposition in the election and who is not an active participant in the campaign or candidacy of any candidate with opposition in the election canvassed. The Chair of the Board of county commissioners must also appoint a member of the Board of county commissioners as an alternate member of the canvassing board. Staff recommended the Board appoint a member to serve as the Board's primary member on the Canvassing Board for the 2022 election. If possible, the Chair should also appoint a Board member to serve as an alternate member of the canvassing board. • The Board appointed commissioner Chris Dzadovsky to serve as the primary member of the Canvassing Board for the 2022 elections. • The Board appointed commissioner Linda Bartz to serve as an alternate member of the Canvassing Board for the 2022 elections. A motion was made to approve staff recommendations, and it passed unanimously. RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commissioner District 5 Cathy Townsend SECONDER: Commissioner District 4 Frannie Hutchinson AYES: Sean Mitchell, Frannie Hutchinson, Chris Dzadovsky, Linda Bartz, Cathy Townsend NAYS: None EXCUSED: None 2. Approval of Budget Increase for Impact Fee Updates — ADD ON Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney, presented this item to the Board. In February 2021, the County retained experts to assist the County in updating the County's roads, parks, public buildings, law enforcement, and library impact fees. Those experts retained were: 201Page Page 27 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM • Nabors Giblin & Nickerson: Legal • Tindale Oliver: Roads only • Planning & Financial Management (PFM): All other impact fees The County retained Traffic Survey Specialists (TSS) to perform traffic counts on certain Midway Road intersections. Due to an expanded scope of work for the impact fee updates, staff requested consultants to provide a "not to exceed" budget estimate for the proposed date of ordinance adoption, currently in April 2022. Those proposed updated budget amounts are as follows: UPDATED BUDGET AMOUNT Nabors Giblin & Nickerson $ 75,000.00 Tindale Oliver $122,486.00 Planning & Financial Management (PFM) $ 70,000.00 Traffic Survey Specialists (TSS) $ 29,400.00 Staff recommended that the Board approve the updated budget amounts set out above and authorize payment to the consultants from the account indicated. H IIIULIUII Wdb MdUC LU df.J pIUVC Jldll 1t=W[lllllCllUdllUIIJ, dllU IL NdaaeU UlldllnllUubly. RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commissioner District 1 Chris Dzadovsky SECONDER: Commissioner District 3 Linda Bartz AYES: Sean Mitchell, Frannie Hutchinson, Chris Dzadovsky, Linda Bartz, Cathy Townsend NAYS: None EXCUSED: None 3. Acceptance of the Donation of Two Vessels, the Spirit of Palm Beach and the Last One, to be used as Artificial Reefs - ADD ON Caroline Valentin, Assistant County Attorney, presented this item to the Board. The County has an Artificial Reef Program that creates new reef systems that enhance the marine ecosystem and recreational fishing and diving in the coastal waters adjacent to St. Lucie County. MCAC Artificial Reef Fund, Inc. (MCAC) arranged for the preparation and deployment of both vessels on another County's artificial reef site but could not complete the deployment due to permitting difficulties. The subject vessels were inspected in Stuart and found clean of pollutants. The vessels have a short timeline to be deployed and have 211Page Page 28 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM already been inspected and approved by the U.S. Coast Guard and St. Lucie County. The MCAC has already cleaned the vessels at no cost to the County. The St. Lucie County Artificial Reef Program, will provide $20,000 towards the transportation and deployment of the Spirit of Palm Beach. MCAC will pay for the remaining cost of deployment and transportation for both vessels. Both vessels will be deployed directly from Willis Custom Yachts in Stuart to the County's Fort Pierce Sportfishing Club artificial reef site and will not enter the Fort Pierce Inlet. The vessels will be deployed on January 17-18, 2022. Staff recommended the Board accept the donation of both vessels to be used as an artificial reef and authorize the Chair to sign any agreements or documents necessary to facilitate the transfer and deployment of the vessels, as approved by the County Attorney. A motion was made to approve staff recommendations, and it passed unanimously. RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commissioner District 5 Cathy Townsend SECONDER: Commissioner District 1 Chris Dzadovsky AYES: Sean Mitchell, Frannie Hutchinson, Chris Dzadovsky, Linda Bartz, Cathy Townsend NAYS: None EXCUSED: None B. PARKS & RECREATION 1. Parks and Recreation Master Plan Adoption - 10 years Master Plan 2023 - 2033 Matt Baum, Interim Parks & Recreation Director, presented this item to the Board. The Parks and Recreation Department's mission is to enhance the quality of life in St. Lucie County by providing memorable, positive experiences for citizens and visitors at our parks, recreational facilities, athletic fields, and event venues. There is no better way to accomplish this mission than to identify the activities and spaces that provide these experiences and plan to secure these places, spaces, and amenities for the future. The Parks and Recreation Masterplan has comprehensively examined the County's current parks and recreation assets' ability to meet the needs of the County and has outlined the steps needed to close the gaps between current capabilities and those needs. This plan will provide a 10-year strategy for creating, optimizing, and maintaining County Parks and Recreation assets: • Invest in the Development of a Regional Outdoor Recreation and Entertainment Park • Improve existing parks and Preserves • Construct New Parks • Protect significant Natural Lands 221Page Page 29 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM • Build Indoor Recreation Centers • Building a Regional Aquatics Center • Develop a countrywide trials network • Expand Boating Access • Offer a variety of affordable recreation sports and wellness programs The mission and role of the County's Parks and Recreation Department are to evaluate the County's existing Parks, Preserves, and Recreation System. Also, identify residents' needs and priorities, develop a long-range vision to meet needs, and become more resilient and sustainable economically, socially, and environmentally. The County citizenry's recreational needs and exploring the best way to meet those needs within the mission of the Department and the County's Strategic Plan Objectives and Frameworks have been successfully laid out in this Parks and Recreation Master Plan. On June 4, 2019, the Board approved to waive the RFP/RFQ process and award the Parks, Parks Preserves, and Recreation Master Plan consulting service to Barth Associates, LLC via item no. 7087. There is no financial impact at this time. Staff requested the Board approve and adopt the Parks and Recreation 10-year Master Plan 2023 - 2033. ri IIIULIUII VVdb IIIdUC LU dPPIUVU JLd1I ICL.UIIIIIICIIUdLIU11J, dllU IL f.1dJJCU UIId111111VUJly. RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commissioner District 4 Frannie Hutchinson SECONDER: Commissioner District 5 Cathy Townsend AYES: Sean Mitchell, Frannie Hutchinson, Chris Dzadovsky, Linda Bartz, Cathy Townsend NAYS: None EXCUSED: None C. PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES 1. MMR RV Park Major Site Plan to develop a gated, 80-lot recreational vehicle (RV) park, with an office/clubhouse and pool with associated site improvements located North US Highway 1 and TurnpikeFeeder Road. *Item presented in conjunction with Public Hearing 9.A.5 Jodi Nentwick-Kugler, Planning & Development Services Senior Planner, presented this item to the Board. Friends I, LLC, represented by Bradley Currie of Engineering Design & Construction Inc., applied on May 7, 2021, for a change in zoning from CG, Commercial, General to Planned NonResidential Development (PNRD), and a preliminary site plan to develop a recreational vehicle (RV) park. The project site consists of two (2) parcels outlined in red with a combined area of 16.97 acres, located at North US Hwy. 1 and 231Page Page 30 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM Turnpike Feeder Rd., North of Kings Highway. Under the public notice requirement outlined in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, these Public Hearings were advertised in St. Lucie Tribune on Friday, November 26, 2021. In addition, notices were mailed to adjacent property owners within 500 feet of the subject properties. Two signs were placed on the subject property, one at N US Highway 1 and the second on Turnpike Feeder Road. The project, known as MMR RV Park, proposes a gated 80-site RV park with a 2,176 SF office and 2,690 SF clubhouse with pool and associated site improvements. Conditions of approval: • Before approval of the Final/Major Site Plan, the applicant shall demonstrate compliance with Land Development Code, Section 7.10.24 Community Architectural Standards for the clubhouse, including a lighting and sign plan. • Recreational Vehicle (RV) sites shall be for rental only. No sale of individual sites is permitted. • The length of stay of each rental site is limited to 180 days in accordance with the Florida statute. On November 18, 2021, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Preliminary Planned Non -Residential Development Rezone & Site Plan and voted to forward a recommendation of approval to the Board of County Commissioners. Staff recommended Board approval for Resolution 2022-1 for the Major Site Plan known as MMR RV Park. FA 111ULIU11 Wd�) IIIdUC LU dp pIUVC JLdll 1t=W[11111U11UdL1U11J, d11U IL PdJ�)eU UIId111111UUJly. RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commissioner District 4 Frannie Hutchinson SECONDER: Commissioner District 5 Cathy Townsend AYES: Sean Mitchell, Frannie Hutchinson, Chris Dzadovsky, Linda Bartz, Cathy Townsend NAYS: None EXCUSED: None 2. AECOM DVB1 Ramp requesting a Major Adjustment to the Major Site Plan to modify the existing site's parking area and Traffic Circulation to the previously approved site plan known as DV131 Delivery Station -TARGETED INDUSTRY Staff recommends the Board approve Resolution 2022-4 for a major adjustment to the major site plan known as DV131 Delivery Station. *This item was pulled during the meeting. 11. ANNOUNCEMENTS 24 1 Pagl Page 31 of 381 BOCC Regular Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 6:00 PM A. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Regular meeting on Tuesday, January 25, 2022, at 9 AM in the Commission Chambers of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex located at 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL. B. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Special Informal meeting on Tuesday, January 25, 2022, at 1 PM in the Commission Chambers of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex located at 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL. C. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Regular meeting on Tuesday, February 1, 2022, at 6 PM in the Commission Chambers of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex located at 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL. D. The Board of County Commissioners will hold an Informal meeting on Tuesday, February 8, 2022, at 9 AM in the Commission Chambers of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex located at 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Regular meeting on Tuesday, February 15, 2022, at 9 AM in the Commission Chambers of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex located at 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL. F. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Special Informal meeting on Tuesday, February 22, 2022, at 9 AM in the Commission Chambers of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex located at 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL. 12. MOTION TO ADJOURN Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson of District 4 announced she would not re -run for election in November 2022. With no other information to be brought for consideration before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 8:10 PM. Please note: Final minutes are recorded in the official minute's books filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and available for inspection upon request. 25 1 Page 32 of 381 S 1:, L- L •. INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM 46Wf!tkt__ COUNTY ATTORNEY, S OFFICE Lj ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Vera Smith, Recording Secretary FROM: Susan Bellamy, Legal Assistant Cowlnff§� W01119111 DATE: January 19, 2022 SUBJECT: Memorandum of Voting Conflict --- Commissioner Townsend — Board of County Commissioners Meeting on January 11, 2022 Attached please find the executed original of the above referenced form for agenda item 9A4. Please include in the minutes for the January 11, 2022, Board of County Commissioners meeting. Please process accordingly. Islb Attachments Page 33 of 381 FORM 8B MEMORANDUM OF VOTING CONFLICT FOR COUNTY, MUNICIPAL, AND OTHER LOCAL PUBLIC OFFICERS LAST NAME—F{RST NAME —MIDDLE NAME Townsend, Cathy MAILING ADDRESS 2300 Virginia Avenue CITY COUNTY Fort Pierce St. Lucie DATE ON WHICH VOTE OCCURRED January 11, 2022 NAME OF BOARD, COUNCIL. COMMISSION. AUTHORITY, OR COMMITTEE St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners THE BOARD, COUNCIL, COMMISSION, AUTHORITY OR COMMITTEE ON WHICH I SERVE IS A UNIT OF :1 CITY COUNTY .l OTHER LOCAL AGENCY NAME OF POLITICAL SUBDIVISION: St. Lucie County MY POSITION IS ELECTIVE 1 APPOINTIVE WHO MUST FILE FORM 813 This form is for use by any person serving at the county, city, or other local level of government on an appointed or elected board, council, commission, authority, or committee. It applies to members of advisory and non -advisory bodies who are presented with a voting conflict of interest under Section 112.3143, Florida Statutes. Your responsibilities under the law when faced with voting on a measure in which you have a conflict of interest will vary greatly depending on whether you hold an elective or appointive position. For this reason, please pay close attention to the instructions on this form before completing and filing the form. INSTRUCTIONS FOR COMPLIANCE WITH SECTION 112.3143, FLORIDA STATUTES A person holding elective or appointive county, municipal, or other local public office MUST ABSTAIN from voting an a measure which would inure to his or her special private gain or loss, Each elected or appointed local officer also MUST ABSTAIN from knowingly voting on a measure which would inure to the special gain or loss of a principal (other than a government agency) by whom he or she is retained (including the parent, subsidiary, or sibling organization of a principal by which he or she is retained); to the special private gain or loss of a relative; or to the special private gain or foss of a business associate. Commissioners of community redevelopment agencies (CRAB) under Sec. 163.356 or 163.357, F,S„ and officers of independent special tax districts elected on a one -acre, one -vote basis are not prohibited from voting in that capacity. For purposes of this law, a "relative" includes only the officer's father, mother, son, daughter, husband, wife, brother, sister, father-in-law, mother-in-law, son-in-law, and daughter-in-law. A "business associate" means any person or entity engaged in or carrying on a business enterprise with the officer as a partner, joint venturer, coowner of property, or corporate shareholder (where the shares of the corporation are not listed on any national or regional stock exchange). ELECTED OFFICERS: In addition to abstaining from voting in the situations described above, you must disclose the conflict: PRIOR TO THE VOTE BEING TAKEN by publicly stating to the assembly the nature of your interest in the measure on which you are abstaining from voting; and WITHIN 15 DAYS AFTER THE VOTE OCCURS by completing and filing this form with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who should incorporate the form in the minutes. APPOINTED OFFICERS: Although you must abstain from voting in the situations described above, you are not prohibited by Section 112.3143 from otherwise participating in these matters. However, you must disclose the nature of the conflict before making any attempt to influence the decision, whether orally or in writing and whether made by you or at your direction. IF YOU INTEND TO MAKE ANY ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION PRIOR TO THE MEETING AT WHICH THE VOTE WILL BE TAKEN; • You must complete and file this form (before making any attempt to influence the decision) with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who will incorporate the form in the minutes, (Continued on page 2) CE FORM 813 - EFF. 1112013 Adopted by reference 1n Rule 34-7.010(1)(f), F.A.C. PAG - Page 34 of 381 APPOINTED OFFICERS (continued) • A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency. • The form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the farm is filed. IF YOU MAKE NO ATTEMPT TO INFLUENCE THE DECISION EXCEPT BY DISCUSSION AT THE MEETING. • You must disclose orally the nature of your conflict in the measure before participating. • You must complete the form and file it within 15 days after the vote occurs with the person responsible for recording the minutes of the meeting, who must incorporate the form in the minutes. A copy of the form must be provided immediately to the other members of the agency, and the form must be read publicly at the next meeting after the form is filed. DISCLOSURE OF LOCAL OFFICER'S INTEREST Cathy Townsend , hereby disclose that on January 11 (a) A measure came or will come before my agency which (check one or more) V inured to my special private gain or loss; inured to the special gain or loss of my business associate, inured to the special gain or loss of my inured to the special gain or loss of whom I am retained; or inured to the special gain or loss of is the parent subsidiary, or sibling organization or subsidiary of a principal which has retained me. (b) The measure before my agency and the nature of my conflicting interest in the measure is as follows: I reside within 500 feet of the development (Sanctuary Cove). Board of County Commissioners Item 9A4 - Preliminary PUD Site Plan Extension Request - Sanctuary Cove Planned Unit Development 20 22 by , which If disclosure of specific information would violate confidentiality or privilege pursuant to law or rules governing attorneys, a public officer, who is also an attorney, may comply with the disclosure requirements of this section by disclosing the nature of the interest in such a way as to provide the public with notice of the conflict. Date Filed I I Signature NOTICE: UNDER PROVISIONS OF FLORIDA STATUTES §112.317, A FAILURE TO MAKE ANY REQUIRED DISCLOSURE CONSTITUTES GROUNDS FOR AND MAY BE PUNISHED BY ONE OR MORE OF THE FOLLOWING: IMPEACHMENT, REMOVAL OR SUSPENSION FROM OFFICE OR EMPLOYMENT, DEMOTION, REDUCTION IN SALARY, REPRIMAND. OR A CIVIL PENALTY NOT TO EXCEED S10,000. CE FORM 813 - EFF. 1112013 PAGE 2 Adopted by reference in Rule 34-7.010(1)(f), F.A.C. Page 35 of 381 �4o LUCDI� 0 P o p BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Informal Meeting January 11, 2022 Convened: 9:01 AM Adjourned: 9:37 AM 1. CALL TO ORDER - COMMISSIONER MITCHELL, CHAIR BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS The meeting was called to order at 09:01 AM by Chair Sean Mitchell, District No. 2. Present Commissioner Sean Mitchell District 2, Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson District 4, Commissioner Chris Dzadovsky District 1, Commissioner Linda Bartz District 3, Commissioner Cathy Townsend District 5 Also Present Howard Tipton, County Administrator Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator Alphonso Jefferson, Deputy County Administrator Dan McIntyre, County Attorney Jennifer Hance, St. Lucie Habitat for Humanity Housing Manager Bob Calhoun, St. Lucie Habitat for Humanity Executive Director Caroline Valentin, Asst. County Attorney Jennifer Hill, OMB Director Leslie Olson, Planning & Dev. Services Director George Landry, Solid Waste Division Director Patrick Dayan, Water Quality Division Manager Joshua Revord, Coastal Engineer Desiree Cimino, Purchasing Manager, Vera Smith, Deputy Clerk Recording Secretary 2. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. Presentation by St. Lucie Habitat for Humanity Bob Calhoun, Executive Director, and Jennifer Hance, Housing Manager of St. Lucie Habitat for Humanity, provided a brief presentation regarding the organization's program model, program components, and partnerships with local governments. The St. Lucie Habitat for Humanity is a nonprofit organization founded in 1996 to meet the affordable housing needs of low-income families living in St. Lucie County. Habitat for Humanity provides affordable loans for mortgage services to low-income families while recycling that money back into the programs. The program has adopted the Community Land Trust ground leased sale and ownership model. Home sales will be transitioned to a ground -lease land trust model providing the benefit of homeownership to that first generation of owners while Page 36 of 381 BOCC Informal Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 9:00 AM preserving the affordability for the next generation of owners to ensure a supply of permanently affordable homeownership opportunities. The stability that a home should bring remains out of reach for far too many families. The New Homeownership Program • St. Lucie Habitat for Humanity partners with families earning 80% or below the area median income • Habitat homeowners pay no more than 30% of their income on a low to no interest mortgage • Habitat homeowners take financial wellness courses and complete sweat equity volunteer hours • Families qualify based on need — overcrowded, overpriced, and/or substandard housing The Critical Repair Program • Allows families to continue living in safe, decent homes • Addresses repairs where the household members' health and safety may be at risk (i.e., unsafe roofing, unsafe flooring, air conditioning/heating, electrical and plumbing issues) • Affordable loans are made to the homeowner to cover the cost of work A notice of funding availability will be published within the next 40-60 days for applicants to apply for prepares with the Community Development Block Grant Program (CDBG), and it will be leveraged with the Home Funding and the State Housing Initiatives Partnership Program (SHIP) funding. Anything from minor repairs to demolition and rebuilding can be done with these programs. Applicants must be income -eligible to qualify with 80% Area Median Income (AMI) or below. The program also has set aside 50% or below requirements and special needs. An inspection and title search will be done on the applicant's property to ensure the title is clear and that no adverse liens or judgments are on the property. Once everything is cleared, the applicant's home will be put up for bid, the bank will be funded, and a deferred payment loan will be placed on the applicant's home, which will not have due payable until they sell or refinance it changes the title. By building partnerships within the community through financial support, volunteering, or advocating for affordable housing, Habitat for Humanity believes that everyone can help families achieve the strength, stability, and self-reliance they need to build better lives for themselves. B. Local Preference - Interlocal Agreement with Martin County Howard Tipton, County Administrator, and Desiree Cimino, Purchasing Manager, presented this item to the Board. On April 21, 2009, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 09-005, which provided preference for local businesses in purchasing or contracting. At the public hearing to consider adopting the Ordinance, the Board heard from local businesses based in St. Lucie County. These businesses requested that St. Lucie County enter into "reciprocity" agreements with neighboring counties to allow businesses in each County to receive the benefits of local preference. One of those counties is Martin County. Martin County and St. Lucie County currently have an interlocal agreement that extends local bidder preference to each other's local bidders, which expires on March 5, 2022. If approved, the drafted Third Amendment to April 23, 2019, Interlocal Agreement between both County's would extend the term to March 5, 2023. Copies of the Interlocal Agreement were provided to the Board. The Board discussed the importance of the reciprocation to help protect local businesses and the benefits to the entire Treasure Coast Community, and a consensus was made to move forward with Martin County. 2 1 PagE Page 37 of 381 BOCC Informal Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 9:00 AM C. Proposed Change to the Policy Pertaining to Feasibility Studies in Section 2.3 of the County's Purchasing Manual - ATTACHMENT ADDED Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney, and Desiree Cimino, Purchasing Manager, presented this item to the Board. Some years ago, the Board adopted a policy that prohibits a professional consultant who contracts to perform a feasibility study on a County capital project to participate in any future design work that might become necessary due to the consultant's advice. The policy also provides that the Board may waive the policy by majority vote. When the Board adopted the policy, the Board was primarily concerned about the optics of the situation and the potential for the consultant performing the feasibility study to gain an unfair advantage over other firms that may be interested in designing the project. Due to some recent waiver requests, the County Administrator has asked interested County staff members to review the existing policy to see if any changes or clarifications are needed. As a result of this review, the County staff proposes that the Board consider clarifying the existing policy. If adopted, it would amend the County's Purchasing Manual. The proposed changes for the Board to consider are to: • Provide a definition of a "feasibility study." • Provide clarification that the policy applies to "prime consultants" only. • Provide clarification that a feasibility study would not include a Project Development and Environmental (PD&E) study required by the state or federal government. "Any professional consultant that contracts as the prime consultant with the County to perform a study as to the feasibility of any County capital project shall not be eligible to participate as the prime consultant in any future design work on that project that might become necessary as a result of the consultant's advice. This policy shall be included in any request for proposals related to the feasibility of any County project. The Board may waive this policy by majority vote. For the purpose of this policy, a feasibility study is an analysis that considers all of a capital project's relevant factors — including economic, technical, legal, and scheduling considerations — to ascertain the likelihood of completing the proiect successfully. A feasibility study does not include a project development and environmental (PD&E) study required by the state or federal government." With regard to the proposed clarification concerning Project Development and Environmental (PD&E) studies, the County Public Works staff has indicated that the study is typically performed after the project has been determined to be feasible. The County Administration requested that this issue be placed on the Board's informal meeting agenda for discussion and direction. Upon discussion of the Board, a consensus was made to bring the item back to the regular meeting agenda schedule. 3. ADJOURNMENT With no other information to be brought for consideration before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:37 AM. Please note: Final minutes are recorded in the official minute's books filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and available for inspection upon request. Page 38 of 381 LUC 1D 0 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Special Informal Meeting January 11, 2022 Convened: 1:00 PM Adjourned: 1:38 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER - COMMISSIONER MITCHELL, CHAIR BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS The meeting was called to order at 1:00 PM by Chair Sean Mitchell, District No. 2. Present Commissioner Sean Mitchell District 2, Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson District 4, Commissioner Chris Dzadovsky District 1, Commissioner Linda Bartz District 3, Commissioner Cathy Townsend District 5 Also Present Howard Tipton, County Administrator Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator Alphonso Jefferson, Deputy County Administrator Dan McIntyre, County Attorney Caroline Valentin, Asst. County Attorney John Titkanich, Innovation & Performance Division Director George Landry, Solid Waste Division Director Leslie Olson, Planning & Dev. Services Director Katherine Barbieri, Asst. County Attorney Don West, Public Works Director Jennifer Hill, OMB Director Gino Butto, Chief Information Officer Vera Smith, Deputy Clerk Recording Secretary 2. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study — ATTACHMENTS ADDED Howard Tipton, the County Administrator, opened the discussion by advising that this meeting is the first two-part special informal meetings dedicated to the drafted road impact fee study. On January 25, 2022, another special informal meeting will be held on the remaining impacts fees for parks, libraries, public buildings, and law enforcement. He advised that all impact fees are reviewed periodically to reflect current conditions and legislative requirements. Regarding the road impact fees, the County is in a year of advance of the original plan update due to the City of Port St. Lucie's termination of the previous existing impact fee agreement for both roads and parks. Page 39 of 381 BOCC Informal Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 1:00 PM The subsequent actions and termination of the agreement City to adopt a mobility fee that includes certain county roads as the subject of the dispute resolution process that the County is currently in with the City of Port St. Lucie. Both parties are currently in the mediation stage of the process and will hopefully have a date set soon. The dispute resolution process and development of an updated impact fee study can and need to run on parallel paths. The road impact fee discussion will be the first step in a multi -step public process to get that accomplished so that the development community residents and businesses may have some clarity on the possible costs. John Titkanich, Innovation & Performance Division Director, presented this item to the Board. A brief update on the alternative collection mechanisms and a few reminders of some of the County's actions. St. Lucie County engaged the services of Tindale Oliver to update its Road Impact Fee Study in March 2021. The County's most recent study was updated in 2017/2018 and adopted on July 2, 2019. Impact Fees represent an essential revenue source assessed to offset infrastructure costs necessitated by future growth and development. The County is responsible for County roads and the regional road network. Specifically, the County's responsibilities include planning, development, construction, and maintenance of the County roadway system. The increase in impact fees is attributable primarily to roadway construction costs increasing, a reduction in state funding for road construction, and the County not fully implementing the initially recommended impact fee rates for specific land -use types proposed in 2017/2018. The County reduced impact fees for specific land -use types to foster a favorable economic environment. The Commission also authorized the 25% discount to County road impact development within the City of Port St. Lucie. This percentage is roughly equal to the discounted amount under the former terminated local agreement for residential development. The Commission directed our consultant Tindale Oliver to review the current framework where we have a single mainland Medical District that excludes City roads from the study and determine the appropriate impact to County road systems by traffic generated and originating from within the Cities. The county staff has reviewed the drafted impact study and provided copies for review of the Cities and Stakeholders. An essential component of this dynamic process is public and stakeholder input and reward received comments from the City of Port St. Lucie and the Transportation Planning Organization (TPO). Nilgun Kamp of Tindale Oliver presented a brief overview of the background, technical study, and benefit zones of the impact fee study to the Board. She advised some of the Legal Requirements under— F.S. 163.31801 must provide: • Most recent and localized data • Minimum of 90-day notice for any fee increases after adoption • May not be collected before building permit • Rational nexus in the amount of collection and expenditures • May not use for prior debt or projects unless there is a nexus showing use for need due to new growth • In any action challenging the fee, the government has the burden of proof • Accounting of impact fee collections & expenditures The limit on the increase must not be more than 12.5% per year, cannot be increased more than 50%, and cannot be increased more than once every four years with the exception clause of the 21Page Page 40 of 381 BOCC Informal Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 1:00 PM demonstration of extraordinary circumstances within the past 12 months including two public workshop discussions and the approval of a governing body. In terms of the technical analysis, the methodology used is consumption -based and is used by many Florida jurisdictions. It charges based on the value of the transportation infrastructures consumed by its calculation, and it ensures that the new law firm is not being charged for existing deficiencies. The Board always has the option to adopt the reduced percentage. The Road impact fee formula: • Net Road Impact Fee = (Cost — Credit) x Demand (Cost to add capacity — Nonimpact fee revenue from future development) x Vehicle miles of travel Cost Component: County Roads Sources: St. Lucie County roadway improvements *Midway Rd from Arterial A to 1-95 *Glades Cut -Off Rd from Arterial A to 1-95 *Construction Cost per Lane Mile =$2.8 Million Cost Component: State Roads Sources: Florida Department of Transportation Bid Tabs *Florida Department of Transportation Bid Tabs *SR 614 (Indrio Rd) from E. of S.R. 9 (1-95) to E. of SR 697 (Emerson Ave) *SR 713 (Kings Hwy) from S. of S.R. 70 to S.R. 9 (1-95) Overpass *Construction Cost per Lane Mile =$4.7 Million Current County funding is used primarily for operations and maintenance. Road impact fees and potentially state funding will be used for future capacity expansion projects. A summary of changes from the previous study: • Cost per lane mile increase: • $3.80 million to $5.46 million =+45% • Credit decrease: • 23.1 pennies to 17.1 pennies = -25% (credit reduction = fee increase) • Approximate rate increase = +70% • Additional variations due to changes in the demand component Based on the preceding, it is proposed the County establish five (5) Impact Fee Benefit Zones, three (3) on the mainland and two (2) for the barrier island. The proposed impact fee schedule proposes an increase in impact fees by respective land -use type. It then establishes the amount attributable to development occurring within the cities. The financial impact cannot be calculated and depends on the final impact fee schedule rates adopted by the County Commissioners. 3 1 PagE Page 41 of 381 BOCC Informal Meeting Tuesday, January 11, 2022 1:00 PM John Titkanich, Innovation & Performance Division Director, provided an overview of the next steps in the impact fee process and future meeting scheduling. • Public/Stakeholder Meetings: • Wednesday, February 3, 2022, 6 PM (Chambers) • Wednesday, February 9, 2022, 6 PM (Virtual) • Special Informal BOCC Meeting • Tuesday, February 22, 2022, 1 PM. • Planning/Zoning Comm. Meeting • Thursday, March 17, 2022, 6 PM. • BOCC Public Hearings • First Public Hearing • Tuesday, April 5, 2022, 6 PM. • Second (Adoption) Public Hearing • Tuesday, April 19, 2022, 9 AM. 3. ADJOURNMENT With no other information to be brought for consideration before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 1:38 PM. Please note: Final minutes are recorded in the official minute's books filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and available for inspection upon request. 41Page Page 42 of 381 NUE URBAN CONCEPTS LAND USE • MOBILITY • PARKING - FEES December 16th, 2021 Mr. Russ Blackburn City Manager City of Port St. Lucie 121 S.W. Port St. Lucie Blvd Port St. Lucie, FL 34984 NUE URBAN CONCEPTS, LLC 2579 SW 871h Drive, Suite 101 Gainesville, FL 32608 833-NUC-8484 nueurbanconcepts@gmail.com Re: City of Port St. Lucie Initial Review of County Road Impact Fee Study Dear Mr. Blackburn: An initial review of the County's road impact fee has been undertaken. A more detailed review will be provided. However, before a review can commence, there are a few items that need to be addressed quickly before a more accurate review can be undertaken. The following is a general description of each items and the appropriate referenced table: Issue # 1: Share of Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) The County conducted a review of the share of Vehicle Miles of Travel and prepared Table 1 on page 11 of the technical report (See Attached). The footnote indicated that limited access facilities were excluded. No map or table was provided to illustrate what where the geographic limits of the areas evaluated. Given the City and County are both using the same model, the 44% number indicated in Table 1 cannot be replicated and is significantly higher than our analysis. This is the single biggest item of discussion between the City and County as it relates to share of fees (emphasis added). I cannot say at this time if this % is or is not accurate. The City's Technical Report provided the areas evaluated and a segment -by -segment table showing where the % share of VMT travel occurred. To review this number, a map of the area showing what area were evaluated between the County, Ft. Pierce, and Port St. Lucie. Second, a table of all roads evaluated that shows the road name, from, to, breakdown by maintenance entity (City, County, Developer, FDOT), number of lanes, segment length, and AADT. The information can then be verified to determine if 44% is a correct number or not. The Table also does not indicate if this VMT data is from the base year of the model, 2020 conditions, or 2045 conditions. There is also no documentation as to why the County believes that they have authority over state roads. While only a portion of US Hwy 1 and Port St. Lucie Blvd are state roads in the City, based on the analysis conducted for the mobility fee, these two state roads had a VMT greater than all County roads in the City. Thus, it is essential that state roads be separated in this analysis. Given the significant number of developer roads south of Midway Road, the County needs to clearly illustrate other or developer. There is still a larger discussion related to how to address developer roads, but the starting point needs to be knowing what % of travel and what roads are being provided by developers. www.nueurbanconcepts.com Page 43 of 381 Issue # 2: Use of City Roads in the County's road impact fee This issue has been raised numerous times in public hearings, mediation, and in meetings between the City and the County. In Table B-10 pages B-13 and B-14, there are numerous roads used and referenced in the road impact fee report that are maintained and owned by the City of Port St. Lucie, not St. Lucie County (See attached yellow highlight indicates City roads green developer roads). These roads need to be either removed or noted as City and document the share of travel on City roads that the County is attempting to base its road impact fees upon. This is especially relevant if the 44% share of VMT from Table 1 is tied to the County assuming these are City roads (emphasis added). The table also includes numerous developer roads. The County provides developers a % credit for developer roads that address traffic from those developments. Charging new development, especially development east of Interstate 95, for develop roads west of Interstate 95 raises potential rational nexus and rough proportionality issues that will require further discussion and will need to be addressed. Issue # 3: Proposed Benefit Zones The County's report proposes changes to its current impact fee benefit zones (see attached). These zones are an improvement over the current single mainland zone. The zones still do not address the benefits requirement of the dual rational nexus, especially for the area of the City East of Interstate 95 and South of Midway Road. The model analysis undertaken in developing the mobility fee indicates that more the 70% of all trips never leave Port St. Lucie and over 10% head south into Martin County, almost 5% to Indian River County and another 5% to other counties, leaving roughly 10% of trips going into unincorporated County or Ft. Pierce. The analysis also shows the very few trips head west across Interstate 95 from the development east of Interstate 95. The data also shows that few trips travel north of Midway. However, the percentage of those trips north of St. Lucie West Blvd traveling north are higher than south of St. Lucie West Blvd. In further review of model data, a basis could be made that there may be varying percentages of trips using County roads based on developments east and west of Interstate 95 and north of St. Lucie West Blvd that may be opportunities for further discussion with the County. It is recommended that the benefit zones be split east and west of Interstate 95 similar to how the City currently designates its mobility fee benefit districts. There is also some room to discuss a separate benefit zone / district for the area north of St. Lucie West. Our analysis shows there is a difference in trip distribution for areas that are up to two miles north of St. Lucie West heading south and areas up to two miles south of Midway heading north. The distance between Midway and St Lucie Blvd is roughly four miles. Issue # 4: Cost of Improvements The cost of improvements identified in the City's Phase One Mobility Plan are just under $1 billion (See Attachment for Appendix K from City Mobility Fee). There have been statements made in public that the County does not include the full cost of improvements on Glades Road and Midway Road. The City's mobility plan uses a cost of roughly $20 million a mile for the urban portions of both roads (See Attachment for High -Cost Excerpt Appendix K of City Mobility Fee). 2 Page 44 of 381 The County has collected over $40 million in road impact fees from the City in the last five years. That is more than adequate to cover 100% of the cost for Midway west of Interstate 95 and 50% of the cost of Glades Cut-off north of Midway. The City and County do differ on the need to widen Glades Cut -Off south of Midway Road. The Phase One Mobility Plan identified a need to add a center turn lane and raised median. The County identifies a need to four lane this portion of Glades Cut -Off. The ultimate need is subject to further discussion. In summary, in order to review the County road impact fee report, far more data is needed from Table 1 in terms of a map and detailed segment data showing how the percentage was calculated by roadway ownership. The County needs to remove city roads from its Tables or correctly identify them as City roads and note that their fee is partially based on travel from city roads. Issues number 1 and 2 are the fundamental issues between the City and the County. The City has very clearly documented how it calculated the share of travel on City, County, FDOT, and Developer roads. The County's analysis provides one table with minimal detail showing how the 44% was determined and continues to reference numerous City roads as County roads. It is recommended that the benefit zones be further split east and west of Interstate 95 and that the split along roughly St. Lucie west and the split west of Interstate 95 be further evaluated. Lastly, the City has significant needs east of Interstate 95. This area also has the least impact on any County roads. Discussions are needed to recognize the need in this area of the City and its minimal impact on County roads. Please let me know if you have any questions. Jonathan B. Paul, AICP Principal Attachments: Table 1 County Report Table B-10 County Report Proposed County Benefit Zones Appendix K from City Phase One Mobility Plan High -Cost City and County Roads from City Phase One Mobility Plan M Page 45 of 381 DRAFT Table 1 Travel Adjustment Factor � a . a . .j . Port St.Lucie Generated Vehicle -Miles of Travel Port St. Lucie 1,177,101 56% County/State/Other 924,898 44% Total 2,101,999 100% Fort Pierce Generated Vehicle -Miles of Travel Fort Pierce 46,507 4% County/State/Other 1,030,510 96% Total 1,077,017 100% Source: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Model (TCRPM v4.1) Note: All references to VMT refer to Port St. Lucie or Fort Pierce generated VMT on classified roads for trips beginning or ending in each respective city. Interstate/toll facilities are excluded from the calculations. Tindale Oliver December 2021 11 St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study Page 46 of 381 DRAFT Table B-10 St. Lucie County Smart Moves 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan IN Feasible Jurisdiction lin From TO improvement Lengtn Added imies Design* Capacity Capacity Capacity ot Lapacity Added Added State & Federally Funded Roads TIP 2302566 Yes State King's Hwy 500' S of SR-70 N. of Picos Rd Widen 2L to 4L 1.39 2 2.78 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 30,719 2302567 Yes State King's Hwy N. of Picos Rd N. of 1-95 Overpass Widen 2L to 4L 1.50 2 3.00 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 33,150 4383791 Yes State King's Hwy SR-9/1-95 Overpass North of Commercial Cir Widen 2L to 4L 1.46 2 2.92 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 32,266 4383792 Yes State King's Hwy North of Commercial Cir St. Lucie Blvd Widen 2L to 4L 0.53 2 1.06 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 11,713 4383793 Yes State King's Hwy St Lucie Blvd S. of Indrio Rd Widen 2L to 4L 2.53 2 5.06 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 55,913 2314402 Yes County Midway Rd S. 25th ST/SR-615 SR-5/US-1 Widen 2L to 4L 1.50 2 3.00 C&G 13,320 29,160 15,840 23,760 2314403 Yes County Midway Rd Glades Cut Off Rd Selvitz Rd Widen 2L to 4L 1.59 2 3.18 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 31,625 4317525 Yes County Port St. Lucie Blvd South of Paar Dr South of Alcantarra Blvd Widen 2L to 4L 0.94 2 1.88 C&G 16,815 37,810 20,995 19,735 4317526 Yes County 113ort St. Lucie Blvd ISouth of Alcantarra Blvd South of Darwin Blvd Widen 2L to 4L 1.39 21 2.78 C&G 1 16,815 37,8101 20,995 29,183 Roadway Needs Plan 104 County Williams Rd Shinn Rd McCarty Rd New 2 Lanes 1.52 2 3.04 C&G 0 15,930 15,930 24,214 105 Yes County Airport Connector Johnston Rd Kings Hwy New 4 Lanes 1.42 4 5.68 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 50,864 106 Yes County Airport Connector 1-95 Johnston Rd New 4 Lanes 0.78 4 3.12 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 27,940 107 DEV Developer Northern Connector Florida's Turnpike 1-95 New 4 Lanes 0.94 4 3.76 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 33,671 108 DEV Developer Arterial A Glades Cut -Off Rd Midway Rd New 4 Lanes 2.34 4 9.36 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 83,819 109 DEV Developer Becker Rd Range Line Rd N-S Road B New 4 Lanes 2.03 4 8.12 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 72,715 110 DEV Developer Community Blvd Becker Rd Discovery Way New 4 Lanes 2.80 4 11.20 C&G 0 43,740 43,740 122,472 111 DEV Developer Crosstown Pkwy Range Line Rd Village Pkwy New 4 Lanes 2.72 4 10.88 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 97,430 112 DEV Developer Discovery Way Range Line Rd N-S Road B New 2 Lanes 1.99 2 3.98 C&G 0 15,930 15,930 31,701 113 DEV Developer E-W Road 2 Community Blvd Village Pkwy New 2 Lanes 0.56 2 1.12 C&G 0 15,930 15,930 8,921 114 DEV Developer E-W Road 6 Shinn Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd New 4 Lanes 2.30 4 9.20 C&G 0 43,740 43,740 100,602 115 County Jenkins Rd N. Jenkins Rd St. Lucie Blvd New 4 Lanes 2.26 4 9.04 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 80,953 116 Yes County Jenkins Rd Post Office Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd New 4 Lanes 0.37 4 1.48 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 13,253 117 PE only County Jenkins Rd Walmart Distr. Center Altman Rd New 4 Lanes 0.81 4 3.24 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 29,014 118 County McCarty Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd Williams Rd New 4 Lanes 1.98 4 7.92 C&G 0 44,100 44,100 87,318 119 DEV Developer Newell Rd Shinn Rd Arterial A New 4 Lanes 2.54 4 10.16 C&G 0 44,100 44,100 112,014 120 County North -Mid County Conn Orange Ave Florida'a Turnpike New 4 Lanes 1.88 4 7.52 C&G 0 37,810 37,810 71,083 121 DEV Developer Tradition Pkwy Range Line Rd SW Stony Creek Way New 4 Lanes 2.05 4 8.20 C&G 0 32,110 32,110 65,826 122 County North -Mid County Conn Okeechobee Rd Orange Ave New 4 Lanes 2.93 4 11.72 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 104,953 123 County North -Mid County Conn Midway Rd Okeechobee Rd New 4 Lanes 2.37 4 9.48 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 84,893 124 DEV Developer N-S Road A Becker Rd Crosstown Pkwy New 4 Lanes 5.13 4 20.52 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 183,757 125 DEV Developer N-S Road B Becker Rd Discovery Way New 4 Lanes 2.80 4 11.20 C&G 0 43,740 43,740 122,472 126 DEV Developer Open View Dr (West) N-S Road A Village Pkwy New 4 Lanes 2.97 4 11.88 C&G 0 43,740 43,740 129,908 127 DEV Developer Paar Dr (West) N-S Road A Village Pkwy New 4 Lanes 3.30 4 13.20 C&G 0 43,740 43,740 144,342 128 DEV Developer Range Line Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd Midway Rd New 4 Lanes 5.46 4 21.84 C&G 0 37,810 37,810 206,443 129 DEV Developer Shinn Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd Midway Rd New 4 Lanes 4.95 4 19.80 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 177,309 130 DEV Developer Westcliffe Ln N-S Road A SW Tremonte Ave New 4 Lanes 1.15 4 4.60 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 41,193 131 DEV Developer Williams Ext. McCarty Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd New 4 Lanes 1.65 4 6.60 C&G 0 44,100 44,100 72,765 132 County Bayshore Blvd St. Lucie West Blvd Selvitz Rd Widen 2L to 4L 1.46 2 2.92 C&G 13,320 29,160 15,840 23,126 133 County California Blvd Savona Blvd Del Rio Blvd Widen 2L to 4L 1.33 2 2.66 C&G 16,815 37,810 20,995 27,923 134 DEV Developer Discovery Way N-S Road B Village Pkwy Widen 2L to 4L 1.31 2 2.62 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 26,056 135 County East Torino Pkwy NW Cashmere Blvd Midway Rd Widen 2L to 4L 2.73 2 5.46 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 54,300 136 County Glades Cut -Off Rd Arterial A Selvitz Rd Widen 2L to 4L 5.39 2 10.78 C&G 15,045 33,830 18,785 101,251 Tindale Oliver December 2021 B-13 St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study Page 47 of 381 DRAFT Table B-10 (continued) St. Lucie County Smart Moves 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Cost Lanes Lane Section Initial Future Added Vehicle Miles CapacityID Feasible Jurisdiction On From To Improvement Length Added Miles Design* Capacity Capacity Capacity of Idb .4dad Added Roadway Needs Plan 137 PE only County Jenkins Rd Altman Rd Orange Ave Widen 2L to 4L 3.01 2 6.02 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 59,869 138 County Jenkins Rd Orange Ave N Jenkins Rd Widen 2L to 4L 0.52 2 1.04 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 10,343 139 PE only County Jenkins Rd Midway Rd Post Office Rd Widen 2L to 4L 0.34 2 0.68 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 6,763 140 PE only County Jenkins Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd Walmart Distr. Center Widen 2L to 4L 0.58 2 1.16 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 11,536 141 State Kings Hwy S of Indrio Rd US-1 Widen 2L to 4L 2.85 2 5.70 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 62,985 142 County McCarty Rd Williams Rd Midway Rd Widen 2L to 4L 1.27 21 2.54 C&G 13,320 29,160 15,840 20,117 144 County NW Cashmere Blvd Swan Lake Circle East Torino Pkwy Widen 2L to 4L 1.22 2 2.44 C&G 16,815 37,810 20,995 25,614 145 County Savona Blvd Gatlin Blvd California Blvd Widen 2L to 4L 1.08 2 2.16 C&G 13,320 29,160 15,840 17,107 146 County Selvitz Rd Bayshore Dr Milner Dr Widen 2L to 4L 2.68 2 5.36 C&G 13,320 29,1601 15,840 42,451 148 County Southbend Blvd Becker Rd Port St. Lucie Blvd Widen 2L to 4L 4.79 2 9.58 C&G 13,320 29,160 15,840 75,874 149 Yes County St. Lucie West Blvd E of 1-95 Cashmere Blvd Widen 4L to 6L 1.92 2 3.84 C&G 37,810 56,905 19,095 36,662 161 Yes County California Blvd Del Rio Blvd Crosstown Pkwy Widen 2L to 4L 0.37 2 0.74 C&G 16,815 37,810 20,995 7,768 162 DEV Developer Midway Rd Arterial A 1-95 Widen 2L to 4L 0.88 2 1.76 C&G 13,320 29,160 15,840 13,939 163 DEV Developer Becker Rd N-S Road B Village Pkwy New 6 Lanes 2.26 6 13.56 C&G 0 56,905 56,905 128,605 164 DEV Developer Paar Dr (West) Range Line Rd N-S Road A New 2 Lanes 0.94 2 1.88 C&G 0 15,930 15,930 14,974 165 DEV Developer Open View Dr (West) Range Line Rd N-S Road A New 2 Lanes 0.95 2 1.90 C&G 0 15,930 15,930 15,134 166 County Trade Center/Tom Macki Village Pkwy Discovery Way New 2 Lanes 0.36 2 0.72 C&G 01 15,930 15,930 5,735 167 DEV I Developer IVillage Pkwy Becker Rd I Discovery Way Widen 4L to 6L 1 3.261 21 6.521 C&G 1 30,7801 47,5001 16,720 54,507 Total (All Roads): 365.56 3,492,548 County/Developer Roads (Cost Feasible); 345.04 94% (a) 3,265,802 State Roads (Cost Feasible): 20.52 6% (b) 226,746 VMC Added per Lane Mile: 9,600 County Roads (Cost Feasible); 25.70 63% (c) - State Roads (Cost Feasible): 14.82 37% (d) New Road Construction: 265.92 70% (e) - Lane Addition: 99.64 30% (f) - *C&G = Curb & Gutter (Urban Design), OD = Open Drainage (Rural Design) Source: St. Lucie County Smart Moves 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Tindale Oliver December 2021 B-14 St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study Page 48 of 381 DRAFT Map 2 St. Lucie County Benefit Zones — Proposed Tindale Oliver December 2021 31 St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study Page 49 of 381 APPENDIX K: CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE PHASE ONE MOBILITY PLAN CORRIDORS PERSON MILES NAME FROM STREET TO STREET MAINTENANCE LENGTH MOBILITY PLAN CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT MULTIMODALPROJECTOFSCRIPTION COST OF CAPAITY PRIORITY FUNDED CORRIDOR DESCRIPTION AREA (PMC) COLOR HIGHLIGHTS: GREY= FUNDED PROJECT; GREEN = DEVELOPER PROJECT; ORANGE = HIGH COST PROJECT. BLUE = COUNTY ROAD; CAUTION: NO ACTION, APPROVALS, OR VOTES HAVE OCCURRED. PROJECTS, COST, CAPACITY & PRIORITIES SUBJECT TO CHANGE. Upgrade to............ ............ AIROSOBLVD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD ST JAMES DR CITY 4.24 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WEST OF mukimedalquaIXV of servke, fill in $ 3,177,549 5,084 2026-2035 NO ALCANTARRABLVID SW PARSONS ST PORT ST LUCIE BLVD CITY 0.81 MULTIMODAL STREET COMPLETE RIVER �STOF network gaps Add facility BAYSHORE BLVD MOUNTWELLST PORTST LUCIE BLVD CITY 0.80 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF Add mukimedal facility $ 341,790 965 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER COMPLETE WESTOF oo Enhance quality fservice f..isting BAYSHORE BLVD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD PRIMA VISTA BLVD CITY 3.21 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities $ 1,844,186 ],69] 2026-2035 NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes with Complete BAYSHORE BLVD PRIMAVISTA BLVD SELVITZ RD CITY 1.37 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex with ROW $ 48,276,S36 71,318 HIGH$$$ NO Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance BAYSHORE BLVD SELVITZ RD STIAMES DR CITY 0.92 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE STREET WESTOF RIVER mukimodal quality of service, fill in $ 691,814 1,107 2026-2035 NO network gaps WESTOF Newt Lane Road, Potentia14 Lane Road, DEVELOPER BECKER RD EAT RANGE LINE RD VILLAGE PKWY TBD/HOA 4.29 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER with Complete StreeElements t $ 6,260,015 57,529 DRIVEN DEVELOPER COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance quality ofservice of existing BECKER RD VILLAGE PKWY VIATESORO CITY 6.06 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities $ 3,485, 896 14, 550 2036-2045 NO WIDEN E%ISTING WESTOF Widen from Zto4 Lanes with Complete BECKER RD VIATESORO GIISON RD CITY 2.00 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 23,360,000 104,000 HIGH$$$ NO BDACKWELL DR SE BERKSHIRE BLVD SE UNIVERSITYTERR CITY 0.21 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EAST OF Add mukimodal facility $ 89,752 253 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER COMPLETE EASTOF CALAIS ST SE IBIS AVE MARIPOSAAVE CITY 0.37 MULTIMOOAL STREET RIVER Add mukimodal facility $ 1S9,041 449 2036-2045 NO Upgrade to 8'shared-use pa..,enhance CALIFORNIA BLVD CAMEO BLVD SAVONA BLVD CITY 1.36 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF mukimodal quality of servke, fill in $ 870,220 1,392 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER network gaps WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widenfrom 2W4 Lanes with Complete CALIFORNIA BLVD SAVONA BLVD CROSSTOWN PKWY 1.70 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex with ROW 59,949,186 88,561 HIGH$$$ NO CALIFORNIA BLVD ST LUCIE WEST BLVD TORINO PKWY CITY 2.05 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF o Enhance quality fservice of existing $ 1,1]9, 895 4,925 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities COMPLETE WESTOF CAMEO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD CROSSTOWN PKArY CITY 1.74 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER Add mukimodal facility $ 737,631 2,083 2026-2035 NO COMPLETE WESTOF CAMEO BLVD CROSSTOWN PKWY SW ROCKY BAYOU TERR CITY 0.43 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER Add multmodxl facility $ 183,045 517 2026-2035 NO Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance CANE SLOUGH RD us LENNARDRD CITY 0.22 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EASTOF mukimodal quality of.e k., fill in $ 165,022 264 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER network aaw COMPLETE WESTOF Enhancequality fxerviceof existing$ CASHMERE BLVD DEL RIO BLVD ST LUCIE WEST BLVD CITY 2.11 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER multimadalfacilkies 1,212,939 5,063 2026-2035 NO COMPLETE WESTOF o Enhance quality fservice of existing CASHMERE BLVD ST LUCIE WEST BLVD SWAN E CIRCLE TAK CITY 0.51 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities $ 295,466 1, 233 2026-2035 NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2.4 lanes with Complete CASHMERE BLVD SWAN DARE CIRCLE TORINO PKWY CITY 1.S0 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 17,523,511 78,016 HIGH$$$ NO WESTOF Upgradeto 10'tra11, enhance mukimodal COMMERCE [ENTER DR CROSSTOWN PKWYCOMPLETE ST LUCIE WEST BLVD HOA 2.13 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER quality of service $ 2,133,141 7,6J9 2036-2045 NO COMPLETE WESTOF Upgrade to 10'tra11, enhance mukimodalS COMMERCE CENTER DR ST LUCIE WEST BLVD GLADES CUT-OFF RD CITY 3.13 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER quality of service $ 3,130,]04 ll,iJl 2036-2045 NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2.4 lanes with Complete DEVELOPER COMMUNITYBLVD TRADITION PKWY DISCOVERY WAY CITY 0.8] MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 1,286,822 11,826 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WESTOF New 2 Dane Road, Potential 4 lane Road, DEVELOPER COMMUNITYBLVD DISCOVERYWAY BECKER RD ENT HOA 2.89 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER with Coplete me Street Elents m $ 4,263,791 39184 DRIVEN DEVELOPER OUTSIDE OF New 2 Dane Road, Potential 4 lane Road, DEVELOPER CROSSTOWN PKWYEXT GLADES CUT OF F ROAD RANGE UNE RD TBD/HOA 0.S4 MOBILITY NEWROAD AREA with Complete Street Elements $ 804,858 7397 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WESTOF New4 Dane Road with Complete Street DEVELOPER CROSSTOWN PKWYEXT RANGE LINE RD VILLAGE PKWY TBD/HOA 2.69 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER Elements $ 3,969,S03 36,480 DRIVEN DEVELOPER COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance quality 0-vice of existing CROSSTOWN PKWY VILLAGE PKWY us CITY 8.22 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities $ 4,726,230 19,727 2036-2045 NO Upgradeto8'shared-usepath,enha nce DARWIN BLVD BECKER RD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD CITY 3.49 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE STREET WESTOF RIVER mukimocialqualkyofservke, Rllin $ 2,616,734 4,187 2026-2031 NO network gaps Upgrade to 8' shared -use path, enhance DEL RIO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD CALI FORN IA BLVD CITY 2.79 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF mukimod, l quality fservice, fill in $ 2,089,180 3,343 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER network gaps WESTOF New 2 Dane Road, Potential 4 lane Road, DEVELOPER DISCOVERYWY RANGE LINE RD SWRIVERIANDBLVD TBD/HOA 2.00 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER with Complete Street Elements $ 2,954,602 27,153 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WIDEN E%ISTING WEST OF Widen from 2[o 4 lanes with Complete DEVELOPER DISCOVERYWY SWRIVERIANDBLVD VILLAGE PKWY TBD/HOA 1.31 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 1,936,743 21,192 DRIVEN DEVELOPER DREYFUSS BLVD O. L. PEACOCK PARKTRAIL LOOP ROSSER BLVD CITY 0.60 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WEST OF Add mukimodal facility $ 25S, 000 720 2036-2045 NO F LO FIESTA DR OAKLYN ST PRIMAVISTABLVID �MWOI)Al_ STREET COMPLETE RIVER WEITOI Upgrade 1. 1 Lane Divided with Enhanced $ 2S,W0,000 43,160 FUNDED CITY / OTHER STREET COMPLETE RIVER WESTOF M.Itinnocial Elements Upgrade to 2 lane Divided with Enhanced FLORESTA DR PRIMA VISTA BLVD AIROSO BLVD CITY 0.86 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER Mukimocial Elements $ 5,354,748 10,281 2026-2035 NO COMPLETE WESTOF Upgrade to 2 lane Divided with Enhanced FLORESTA DR AIROSO BLVD BAYSHORE BLVD CITY 2.37 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER Mukimodal Elements $ 8,573,778 16,462 2026-2035 NO GATUN BLVD WOFI-95 PORT ST LUCIE BLVD CITY 3.35 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF Enhancequalkyofserviceof existing$ 1,810,730 7,558 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities GILSON RD MARTIN C.L. BECKER RD COUNTY 0.28 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF Add mukimodal facility $ 120,118 339 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER WIDEN T021ANE OUTSIDE OF Widen irom DividedwRh GLADES CUT-OFF RD TRADITION PKWY EXT RANGE LINE RD COUNTY 2.00 MOBILITY DIVIDED AREA Pata.. and Mukimotlal Lanes Shared -Use Pand $ 9,600,000 14,200 2036-2045 NO WIDENTOZIANE WESTOF Widenfrom ZW2 Law Divided with GLADES CUT-OFF RD RANGE LINE RD C24CANAL COUNTY 2.45 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Pa.. and Mukimodal Lanes $ 11,760,000 17,395 2026-2035 NO WIDEN T021ANE WESTOF La Warred GLADES CUT-OFF RD C24 CANAL COMMERCE CENTER DR COUNTY 2.17 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER -en se Pat and Shared -Use Pa.. and Mukimatlal Lanes ultimdalU $ 10,416,000 15,407 2026-2035 NO GLADES CUT-OFF RD COMMERCE CENTER OR MIDWAVRD COUNTY 3.15 MOBILITY WIDEN T021ANE WESTOF Widen irom $ 15,120,000 22,365 2026-2035 NO DIVIDED RIVER Pat and ultimdalLh Shared -Use Pa.. and Mukimodal Lanes By: NUE Urban Concepts Version 1.3: 12/16/21 Page 50 of 381 APPENDIX K: CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE PHASE ONE MOBILITY PLAN CORRIDORS PERSON MILES NAME FROM STREET TO STREET MAINTENANCE LENGTH MOBILITY PLAN CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT MULTIMODALPROIECFDESCRIPTION COST OFCAPAOTY PRIORITY FUNDED CORRIDOR DESCRIPTION AREA (PMC) WIDEN EXISTING OUTSIDE OF Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes with Trail: GLADES CUT-OFF RD MIDWAYRD SELVITZ RD COUNTY 2.27 MOBIUTY ROAD AREA Complex $ 39,93S,920 98,932 HIGH$$$ NO GRANDDR SW WALTON RD SE LENARD RD CITY 1.54 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EASTOF Add mukimodA facility $ 654,088 1,847 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER EASTOF Enhancequality ofservkc of existingL. GREEN RIVER PKWV MARTIN C.L.OMPLETE WALTON RD CITY 2.65 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER muhimodalfacilities $ 1,523,274 6,358 2026-2035 NO COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance quality of service of existing$ HEATHERWOOD BLVD SW CALIFORNIA BLVD SW CASHMERE BLVD CITY 1.09 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER muhimodalfacilities 627,498 2,619 2036-2045 NO Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance HILLMOOR DR us IENNARD RD CITY 2.00 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EASTOF muhimodal quality ofservice, fill in $ 748,835 2,198 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER network gaps Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance JENNINGS RD us LENNARDRD CITY 0.48 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EASTOF muitlmodal quality of service, fill in $ 360,726 577 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER metworkgaps CITY 1.39 COMPLETE WEST OF Add facility $ 2036-2045 KESTOR DRIVE DARWIN BLVD BFCKER RD MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodal 592,155 1,672 NO COMPLETE WESTOF LAKEHURSTDR SW BAYSHORE RD SANDAAVE CITY 1.57 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER Add mukimadal facility $ 667,975 1,886 2036-2045 NO COMPLETE EASTOF Enhance quality ofservice of existing IENNARDRD USI WALTON RD CITY 2.30 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities $ 1,321,123 5,514 2036-2045 NO Upgradeto8'shared-use path, enhance LENNARDRD WALTON RD S OF SAVANNACLUB BLVD CITY 0.79 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EASTOF mukimodal quality of service, fill in $ 593,009 949 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER network gaps Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance LVNGATE DR VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY us CITY 0.62 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EASTOF mukimodal quality of service, fill in $ 462,086 739 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER network gaps WESTOF Newt Lane Road, Potentia14 Lane Road, $ DEVELOPER MARSHALL PKWY RANGE LINE RD IA5 TBD/HOA 4.62 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER with Complete Street Elements 6,831,655 62,783 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WESTOF New 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, DEVELOPER MCCARTYRD GLADES CUT OF F ROAD OKEECHOBEE RD TBD/HOA 3.19 MOBIUTY NEWROAD RIVER with Trail $ 3,799,672 33974 DRIVEN DEVELOPER Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance MELALEUCABLVD LENNARDRD GREEN RIVER PXNY CITY 1.74 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EAST OF muitimodal quality of service, fill in $ 1,305,000 2,088 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER network gaps WIDENT02LANE WESTOF Widenfrom 2 to 2 Lane Divided with MIDWAYRD OKEECHOBEE RD MCCARTYRD COUNTY 2.40 MOBIUTY DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Path and Muhimodal Lanes $ 21,520,000 17,040 2036-2045 NO WIDEN TO 2 LANE WESTOF Widen from 2 to 2 Lane Divided with MIDWAYRD MCCARTY RD N/SARTERIALA COUNTY 1.00 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Path and Mukimedal Lanes $ 4,800,000 7,100 2036-2045 NO WIDENTOZUINE WESTOF Widen irom2to2Une Dividedwkh MIDWAYRD N/SARTERIALA IA5 COUNTY 1.30 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Path and Mukimodal Lanes $ 6,240,000 9,230 2026-2035 NO MIDWAYRD I-9S EASTTORINOPKIVY COUNTY 1.28 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF Add murdmodal facility $ 543,S69 1,535 2036-204S NO 11 STREET RIVER WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2 to 4 La nes with Complete MIDWAYRD EAST TORI NO PRIVY SELVITZ RD COUNTY 1.32 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex $ 23,159,S85 68,426 HIGH $$$ NO COMPLETE OUTSIDE OF Enhance quality of service of existing MIDWAYRD SELVITZ RD US1 COUNTY 2.53 MULTIMODAL STREET AREA mukimodalfacilities $ 1,45], 465 6, 083 2036-2045 NO Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance MORNINGSIDE BLVD WESTMORELANDBLVD LYNGATE DR CITY 2.19 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EASTOF mukimodal quality of service, fill in $ 1,640,228 5,249 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER network gaps WESTOF Road, New2LaneRStreet DEVELOPER N/SARTERIALA GLADES CUT-OFF ROAD MIDWAYRD TBD/HOA 2.42 MOBIUTY NEWROAD RIVER Elemensane with Complete Street Elements $ 3,576,616 32,169 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WESTOF New 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, DEVELOPER N/SROADA BECKER RD EXT CROSSTOWN PKWY EXT TBD/HOA 5.29 MOBIUTY NEWROAD RIVER with Complete Street Elements $ 7,812,281 72,794 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WESTOF N ew 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, DEVELOPER N/SROADA CROSSTOWN PKWY EXT GLADES CUT-OFF RD TBD/HOA 1.45 MOBIUTY NEWROAD RIVER with Complete Street Elements $ 2,146,909 19,730 DRIVEN DEVELOPER LINE 3.35 WESTOF N ew 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, $ 3,991,213 35,686 DEVELOPER NEWELLRD RANGE RDEXT N/SARTERIALA TBD/HOA MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER with To.II DRIVEN DEVELOPER COMPLETE WESTOF NWVOLUCIADRIVE EAST TORINO PKWY NWWESTBIANTONBLVD CITY 1.00 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER Add mukimodal facility $ 427,015 1,206 2036-2045 NO NW WEST BLANTON EASTTORINOPXWY WESTTORINO PKWY CITY 1.07 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF Add facility $ 4S6,764 1,290 2036-2045 NO BLVD STREET I RIVER mukimodal COMPLETE WESTOF OAKRIDGE DR SE OAKLYN ST SW MOUNTWELL ST CITY 0.81 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER Add mukimod,l facility $ 342,7W 968 2036-2045 NO WESTOF Road, New2LaneRStreet DEVELOPER _9111- PAAR DR EXT RANGE LINE RD VILLAGE PKWY TBD/HOA 4.22 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER Elements with Complete S[ree[Elements $ 6,239,697 57,343 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WESTOF PAAR DR EXT VILLAGE PKWY ROSSER BLVD TBD 0.85 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY RIVER Add mukimadal facility $ 360,891 1,019 2036-2045 NO Upgradeto8'shared-use path, enhance PARR DR ROSSER BLVD TULIPBLVD CITY 4.86 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF mukimodal quality of service, fill in $ 3,646,070 5,834 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER network gaps Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance PEACHTREE BLVD SEMMES DR NW SELVITZ RD CITY 0.51 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF mukimodal quality of service, fill in $ 394,926 616 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER network gaps WESTOF Enhancequalkyofserviceof existingE PEACOCKBLVD ST LUCIE WEST BLVD UNIVERSITY BLVD CITY 0.70 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER muk1E od.IfacIIrdes $ 402,595 1,680 2026-2035 NO PEACOCKBLVD UNIVERSITYBLVD CASHMEREBLVD CITY 2.27 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance quality of service of existing $ 1,305,598 5,449 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from Zto4 lanes with Complete $ 4,106,3]4 PORT ST LUCIE BLVD MARTIN C. L. BF[KER RD CITY 0.23 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex 12, 132 2026-2035 NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2.4 lanes with Complete PORT ST LUCI�RLVD BE[KER RD PAARD CITY 1.19 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex $ 20,000,000 61,623 HIGH$$$ NO By: NUE Urban Concepts Version 1. 3: 12/16/21 Page 51 of 381 APPENDIX K: CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE PHASE ONE MOBILITY PLAN CORRIDORS PERSON MILES NAME FROM STREET TO STREET MAINTENANCE LENGTH MOB I UTY PLAN CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT MULTIMODALPROJECI'DESCRIPTION COST OFCAPAOTY PRIORITY FUNDED CORRIDOR DESCRIPTION COMPLETE AREA WEITOF (PMC) PORTST LUCIE BLVD DARWIN BLVD GATLIN BLVD CITY j MU,,:A L STREET 6. RIVER Upgradeto8'shared-use path, enhance L PORT ST LU CIE BLVD GATLIN BLVD ST LUCIE RIVER STATE 3.78 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WLSTOF m,kimod,l quality of service, fill in $ 2,836,111 4,538 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER network gaps Upgradeto8'shared-usepath,enhance PORTSTLUCIEBLVD STLUOERIVER USI STATE 2.08 MULTIMOOAL COMPLETE EASTOF mukimodalq-IXV ofservke,Rllin $ 1,559,70 2,496 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER network gaps Upgradeto8'shared-usepath,enhame PRIMAVISTABLVD BAYSHORE BLVD AIROSO BLVD CITY 1.35 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE STREET WEST OF RIVER mukimodal quality of servke, fill in $ 1,013,012 1,621 2026-2035 NO network gaps Upgrade W 8'shared-use path, enhance PRIMAVISTABLVD AIROSOBLVD us COUNTY 1.96 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE STREET WEST OF RIVER muklmodal qualty of service, fill In $ 1,472,988 2,355 2026-2035 NO network gaps WIDEN T02LANE WESTOF Widenirom2W2Lane Divided with RANGE LINE RD MARTIN COUNTY PARR DR EXT COUNTY 0.98 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Path and Mukimodal lanes $ q,]04,000 6,958 2036-2045 NO WIDENT02LANE WESTOF Widen from 2 W 2 Lane Divided with RANGE LINE RD PAAR DR EXT DISCOVERYWAY COUNTY 1.00 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Path and Multimodal lanes $ 4,800,000 7,100 2036-2045 NO WIDENT021ANE WEST OF Widen from 2 W 2 Lane Divided with RANGE LINE RD DISCOVERYWAY MARSHAL PKWY COUNTY 1.30 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Path and Mukimodal Lanes $ 6,240,000 9,230 2036-2045 NO RANGE LINE RD MARSHALL PKWY TRADITION PKWY EXT COUNTY 1.40 MOBIUTY WIDENT02UNE WESTOF Widen from 2 W 2 Lane Divided with $ 6,720,000 9,940 2036-2045 NO DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Path and Mukimodal lanes WIDENT02LANE WESTOF Widen from 2 W 2 Lane Divided with RANGEUNERD TRADITION PRWY EXT GLADES CUT-OFF RD COUNTY 1.42 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Path and Multimadal lanes $ 6,816,000 10,082 2036-2045 NO OUTSIDE OF New 2 lane Road, Potential 4 lane Road, DEVELO PER RANGE LINE RD EXT GLADES CUT-OFF ROAD OKEECHOBEE RD TBD/HOA 5.65 MOBILITY NEWROAD AREA wRh Trail $ 6,]2],935 60,156 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WESTOF New 2 lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, DEVELOPER RESERVE BLVD EXT SHINN RD GLADES CUT-OFF RD TBD/HOA 2.20 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER with Trail $ 3,252,774 23421 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WEST OF New 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, DEVELOPER RIVERLANDBLVD BECKER RD EXT DISCOVERYWAY TBD/HOA 2.88 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER with Complete Street Elements $ 4,248,533 39044 DRIVEN DEVELOPER Upgradeto8'shared-use path, enhance ROSSER BLVD PARR DR GATLIN BLVD CITY 2.95 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF multimadal quality ofservice, fill in $ 2,215,589 3,545 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER network gaps Upgradeto8',hared-usepath,enha me SANDIADR NW PRIMA VISTA BLVD SETHORNHILLDR CITY 2.07 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF mukimodalquality ofservke, fill in $ 1,554,049 2,486 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER network gaps Upgradeto8'shared-usepath,enhance SAVONA BLVD BECKER RD GATLIN BLVD CITY 3.73 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE STREET WESTOF RIVER mukimodal quality ofservks, fill in $ 2,795,457 4,473 2026-2035 NO network gaps SAVONA BLVD GATUN BLVD CALIFORNIA BLVD CITY 1.08 MOBIUTY WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widenfrom 21*4 Lanes with Complete $ 37,986,419 56,116 HIGH $$$ NO ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex with ROW SELVITZ RD FLORESTA DR BAYSHORE BLVD CITY 0.48 MULTIMOOAL COMPLETE WESTOF Add muBimocial facility $ 205,525 580 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER WIDEN E%ISTING WESTOF Widen from 21B4 Lanes with Complete SELVITZ RD BAYSHORE BLVD MIDWAYRD CITY 2.86 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex $ 50,321,048 148,676 HIGH$$$ NO SHINN RD OKEECHOBEE RD RESERVE BLVD EXT TBD/HOA 2.53 MOBIUTY NEWROAD OUTSIDE OF New 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, $ 3,008,278 26,897 DEVELOPER DEVELOPER AREA with Trail DRIVEN SHINN RDEXT RESERVE BLVD EXT GLADES CUT-OFF ROAD TBD/HOA 2.22 MOBILITY NEWROAD OUTSIDE OF New 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, $ 2,638,710 23,593 DEVELOPER DEVELOPER AREA with Trail DRIVEN WIDEN EX ISTING WESTOF Widenfrom 2 W 4 Lanes with Complete SOUTHSEND BLVD SE OAKRIDGE DR BECKER RD CITY 4.18 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 48,813,859 217,323 HIGH$$$ NO Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance STIAMESBLVD SELVITZRD STIAMESDR HOA O.SS MULTIMODAL COMPLETE STREET WESTOF RIVER muk1r Odalq-IXy ofseMci,, fill in $ 415,481 665 2036-2045 NO network gap ST JAMES DR/25TH STREET AIROSOBLVD ST JAMES BLVD COUNTY 1.87 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance quality of service of existing $ 1,074,110 4,483 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities ST JAMES DR /25TH STREET STIAMES BLVD MIDWAY RD COUNTY 1.4] MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance qualityof service of existing $ 845,739 3,530 2036-2095 NO STUJCIEWESTBLVD COMMERCE CENTER DR AlffiRmVIOD UNTYAMM STREET W DEN EXISTING RIVER WESTOF mukimodal facilities Widen from 2.4 Lane, with Complete �k 17, oo�L 30,698 FUNDED L ROAD WIDEN E%ISTING RIVER WEST OF Street Elements Potential Widening from 4to61anes with ST LUCIE WEST BLVD 1-95 CASHMERE BLVD CITY 2.19 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Complete Street Elements $ 20,313,817 106,166 HIGH$$$ NO COMPLETE WESTOF o Enhance quality fs.,Vi,e of existing ST LUCIE WEST BLVD CASHMERE BLVD BAYSHORE BLVD CITY 0.47 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfaci0ties $ 2]1, 225 1, 132 2026-2035 NO TORINO PKWY(NORTH &WEST) EASTTORINOPKW'/ CALIFORNIA BLVD CITY 2.61 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WEST OF Add mukimOdal facility $ 1,109,744 3,133 2026-2035 NO TOR I N 0 PKINY (EMT) CALI F ORN IA BLVD CASHMERE BLV. 'I CITY I 1.00 MULTIMOCAL STREET RIVER nnidtirnoci.1 q..Ifty fs-ke, fillin $ 750,648 1,201 STREET WIDEN E%ISTING RIVER WESTOF network gaps Widenfrom 2W4 Lanes with Complete TORINO PKWY (EAST) CASHMERE BLVD MIDWAY RD CITY 2.49 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 42,950,447 126,8% HIGH$$$ NO Upgrade to8'shared-use path, enhance THORNHILL DR SW BAYSHORE BLVD SE FLORESTA DR CITY 2.04 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WEST OF mukimadal quality of s-ki,, fill in $ 1,526,780 2,443 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER network gaps COMPLETE EASTOF Enhance quality of service of existing TIFFANY AVE USS LENNARD RD CITY 1.02 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities $ 586, 445 2, 446 2036-2045 NO COMPLETE EAST OF TIFFANVAVE LENNARDRD SE GRAND DR CITY 0.92 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER Add muRimodal facility $ 392,024 1,107 2036-2045 NO OUTSIDE OF New 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, DEVELOPER TRADITION PKWYEXT GLADESCUTOFF ROAD RANGE LINE RD TBD/HOA 1.69 MOBILITY NEWROAD AREA with Complete Street Elements $ 2,500,182 22977 DRIVEN DEVELOPER By: N U E Urb an Concepts Version 1. 3: 12/16/21 Page 52 of 381 APPENDIX K: CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE PHASE ONE MOBILITY PLAN CORRIDORS PERSON MILES NAME FROM STREET TO STREET MAINTENANCE LENGTH MOBILITY PLAN CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT MULTIMODALPROIECIDESCRIPTION COST OFCAPAOTY PRIORITY FUNDED CORRIDOR DESCRIPTION AREA (PMC) WESTOF Ncw41-s-Road wfh Complete Street DEVELOPER TRADITION PKWY E%T RANGE LINE RD STONYCREEKWY TBD/HOA 1.99 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER Elements $ 2,940,623 27024 DRIVEN DEVELOPER COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance quality of service of existing TRADITION PKWY STONVCREEK WY WOF I-95 CITY 1.89 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodialfacilNes $ 1,084,444 4,526 2036-2045 NO Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance TULIPBLVD GATLIN BLVD PORTST LUCIE BLVD CITY 3.37 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF mukimodal quality of,er,k,, fill in $ 2,524,935 4,040 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER netwmkgaps COMPLETE WESTOF Enhancequalityofserviceof existingSTREET UNIVERSITY BLVD US L NW PEACOO(BLVD MARTIN C.L. NW CALIFORNIA BLVD VILLAGE GREEN DR [ITV SlEr J.S. 123 MULTIMODAL MU-1-0-L COMPLETEIMP RIVER mukimodalfacilities 1"Ivn,,q"aIityfssrvi..f existing $ 333,333 �'W� 1,391 2036-2045 'FUNDED NO UsL VILLAGE GREEN DR MIDWAYRD STATE 4.99 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE IMIDEOF COMPLETE EASTOF Enhance quality of service of existing Enhance quality of service of existing $ -MMM FUNDED VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY LYNGATE DR us CITY 0.90 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER muk1E-d.Ifacilities $ 519, 808 2, 170 2036-2095 NO VILLAGE GREEN DR US1 WALTON RD CITY 1.05 COMPLETE MULTIMODAL EASTOF Enhance quality of service of existing $ NO STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilkies 603, 326 2, 516 2026-2035 COMPLETE EASTOF Enhance quality ofservice of existing VILLAGE GREEN DR WALTON RD TIFFANYAVE CITY 0.63 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER multimodalfacifid- $ 361,831 1,510 2026-2035 CITY/OTHER WIDENE%ISTING WESTOF Potential Widening from 4 to 6 Lanes with DEVELOPER VIUAGE PKWY BECKER RD DISCOVERY WAY CITY 3.25 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Complete Street Elements 4,563,632 ]8,812 DRIVEN DRIVEN DEVELOPER COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance quality of service of existing VILLAGE PKWY DISCOVERY WAY TRADITION PKWY CITY 0.75 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfadiffl.s $ 429,]00 1,]94 2036-2045 NO COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance quality of service of existing VILLAGE PKWY TRADITION PKWY CROSSROADS PKWY CITY 2.16 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilkies $ 1,240, 613 S,1]8 2036-2045 NO VILLAGE CROSSROADS PKWY SHINN RD 1.88 WESTOF Newt Lane Road, Poterfia14 Lane Road, $ 2,776,325 DEVELOPER PKWY EXT TBD/HOA MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER with Complete Street Elements 25,514 DRIVEN DEVELOPER US1 LENNARDRD COMPLETE EASTOF Enhance quality of service of existing $ 697,947 2,913 NO WALTON RD COUNTY 1.21 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfa.ilid.s 2026-2035 WIDEN TO 2 LANE EASTOF Upgrade to 2 Lane Dividedwith Enhanced WALTON RD LENNARDRD GREEN RIVER PKWY COUNTY 1.10 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Mukimodal Elements $ 6,849,119 13,150 2036-2045 NO WIDEN TO 2 LANE EASTOF Upgrade to 2 Lane Divided with Enhanced WALTON RD GREEN RIVER PKWY INDIAN RIVER DR COUNTY 0.79 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Mukimodal Elements $ 4,93],651 9,480 2036-2095 NO Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance WESTMORELANDBLVD us MORNINGSIDEBLVD CITY 1.98 COMPLETE MULTIMODAL EASTOF mukimodal quality of service, fill in $ 1,482,410 2,372 2036-204S NO STREET RIVER network gaps COMPLETE EASTOF Enhance quality of service of existing WESTMOREIAND BLVD MORNINGSIDE BLVD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD CITY 1.21 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfadliies $ 694, 607 2, 899 2036-2095 NO WESTOF New 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, DEVELOPER WILLIAMS RD RANGE LINE RD EXT MIDWAY BYPASS GREENWAY TBD/HOA 3.89 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER wide Trai $ 4,623,190 41,337 DRIVEN DEVELOPER 95(PEACOCIQ GREENWAY CROSSTOWN PKWY GATLIN BLVD TBD 2.DS MULTIMODAL GREENWAY WESTOF New 12'-14'shared-use green-, $ 2,S62,500 9,840 PARKS MP NO RIVER WESTOF C 24 CANAL GREENWAY RANGE LINE RDEXT SOUTHBENDBLVD TBD 10.93 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY RIVER EAST OF New 12'-14'shared-use greenway $ 13,667,583 52,484 PARKS MP NO EAST COAST GREENWAY GREEN RIVER CONNECTOR CITY LIM IT us WALTON RD GREEN RIVER PKWY TED TBD 1,05 1.80 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY MULTIMODAL GREENWAY RIVER EASTOF New 12'- 14',ha,,d-,,, g-mvay New 12'-14'sharel-use greerwsay $ 1,314,825 $ 2,255,737 5,049 8,662 FUNDE� PARKS MP FOOT NO RIVER HOGSLOUGH us VILLAGE GREEN DR TBD 0.68 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY EASTOF New 12'-14'boardwalk $ 1,707,908 4,099 PARKS MP NO RIVER MIDWAY BYPASS GREENWAY GLADES CUT-OFF RD us TBD 5.81 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY WESTOF New 12'-14'shared-use greenway $ 7,261,030 27,882 PARKS MP NO RIVER O. L. PEACOCK PARKTRAIL LOOP PEACOCKGREENWAY PEACOCKGREENWAY TBD 2.55 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY WESTOF New 12'-14'shared-use greenway $ 3,187,500 12,240 PARKS MP NO RIVER PEACOCKGREENWAY GATLIN BLVD O. L. PEACOCK PARKTRAIL LOOP TBD 1.12 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY WESTOF New 12'-14'shared-use greenway $ 1,400,000 5,376 PARKS MP NO RIVER TORINO GREENWAY NETORINOPKWY NWPEACOCKBLVD TBD 0.37 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY WESTOF New 12'-14'shared-use greenway $ 457,169 1,756 PARKS MP NO RIVER US I CONNECTOR SE MORNINGSIDE BVLD us TBD 0.24 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY EASTOF New 12'-14'shared-use greenway $ 298,374 1,146 PARKS MP NO RIVER WILDERNESSTRAIL WESTMORELANDBLVD MORNINGSIDEBLVD TBD 1.72 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY EASTOF New 12'-14'shared-use greenway $ 2,150,000 8,256 PARKS MP NO RIVER Toll Cost 288.57 Total Cost$867,272,192. Total Person Miles of CapafM FMC): 2,937,093. $ 867,272,192 1 2,937,093 Developer driven improvemem costare 35% of the calculated wst The person miles ofcapacity Devebper Driven Improvements 6].2fi r&kcts 35%additional capacity above that miii,ed by the development $ g3,154,361 882,612 Atotal of I6%(45.76) of the mobility plan miles (288.57) of improvements represents 67% Total of Nigh Cost Major Road Improvements tobe Reviewed Further 45.76 ($647,292,446)oftheoverall cost($971,]87,302)andissubjedtochange,asareall $ 538,175,445 1,385,252 improvements in the draft Phase One Mobility Nan. County roads comprise a total of 13.6%(36.65) of the Phase One Mobility Plan net miles (269.08). County road imprmementys represents 23.3%($1]9,829,2101 of the overall net cost County Roads(Two segments are also included under high cost major road improvements) 36.65 ($769,873, 987). County roads comprise a total of 13.05%(357,275) of the overall net mu16mada1 $ 1]9,829,210 35],2]5 capacky(2,675,578). By: NUE Urban Concepts Version 1.3: 12/16/21 Page 53 of 381 EXCERPT OF CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE PHASE ONE MOBILITY PLAN HIGH COST CORRIDORS PERSON MILESMULTIMODALPROIECTDESCRIPTION NAME FROM STREET TO STREET MAINTENANCE LENGTH MOBILITY PLAN CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT COST OF CAPACITY PRIORITY FUNDED CORRIDOR DESCRIPTION AREA (PMC) ORANGE = HIGH COST CITY ROAD PROJECTS. BLUE = HIGH COST COUNTY ROAD PROJECTS. 1P WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2 to 4Laneswith Complete BAYSHORE BLVD PRIMAVISTABLVD SELVITZRD CITY 1.31 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex with ROW $ 48,276,536 71,318 HIGH $$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes with Complete BECKER RD VIATESORO GILSON RD CITY 2.00 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 23,360,000 104,000 HIGH $$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes with Complete CALIFORNIA BLVD SAVONA BLVD CROSSTOWN PKWY CITY 1.70 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex with ROW $ 59,949,386 88,561 HIGH$$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes with Complete CASHMERE BLVD SWAN LAKE CIRCLE TORINO PKWY CITY 1.50 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 17,523,511 78,016 HIGH$$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING OUTSIDE OF Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes with Trail: GUDE$CUT-OFF RD MIDWAYRD SELVITZ RD COUNTY 2.27 MOBIUTY ROAD AREA Complex $ 39,935,920 98,932 HIGH$$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2W4 Lanes with Complete MIDWAYRD EAST TORINO PKWY SELVITZ RD COUNTY 1.32 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex $ 23,159,585 68,426 HIGH$$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes with Complete PORT ST LUCIE BLVD BECKER RD PAAR DR CITY 1.19 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex $ 20,000,000 61,623 HIGH $$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF WX)enfrom 2W4 Lanes with Complete SAVONA BLVD GATLIN BLVD CALIFORNIA BLVD CITY 1.08 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex with ROW $ 37,986,419 56,116 HIGH $$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widenfrom 2W4 Lanes with Complete SELVITZ RD BAYSHORE BLVD MIDWAYRD CITY 2.86 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex $ 50,321,048 148,676 HIGH$$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes with Complete SOUTHBEND BLVD SE OAKRIDGE DR BECKER RD CITY 4.18 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 49,913,859 217,322 HIGH$$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Potential Widening from 4 to 6 Lanes with ST LUCIE WEST BLVD I-95 CASHMERE BLVD CITY 2.19 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Complete Street Elements $ 20,313,817 106,166 HIGH$$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widenfrom 2W4 Lanes with Complete TOR I N O PKWY(EAST) CASHMERE BLVD MIDWAYRD CITY 2.44 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 42950447 126,899 HIGH$$$ NO Ato, al of I6%(45.76) of the mobility plan miles (288.57) of improvements represents 67% Totslof High CM Roads 20.51 ($647,292,446) ofthe overallcost($971,]8],302) and is subjectochange, as are all $ 369,494,821 1,058,696 impr r-wr in the draft Phase One Mobility Plan. CouMy roads cmprise a total of 13.6%(36.65) of the Phase One Mobility Plan net miles (269.08). County road improvementVs represents 23.3% ($179,829,210 )of the overall net cost Totslof High Cost County Roads 3.58 ($769,8]3,98]). C-.y roads comprise .total of 13.05%(357,275) of the overall net multhr dal $ 63,095,504 167,358 wpafM (2,6]5,578). By: NUE Urban Concepts Version 1.3: 12/16/21 Page 54 of 381 NUE URBAN CONCEPTS LAND USE • MOBILITY • PARKING - FEES January 5th, 2022 Mr. Russ Blackburn City Manager City of Port St. Lucie 121 S.W. Port St. Lucie Blvd Port St. Lucie, FL 34984 NUE URBAN CONCEPTS, LLC 2579 SW 871h Drive, Suite 101 Gainesville, FL 32608 833-NUC-8484 nueurbanconcepts@gmail.com Re: City of Port St. Lucie Review of St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study Dear Mr. Blackburn: A review of the County's road impact fee study has been undertaken. The following are issues that need to be addressed in the County's study. This review also includes references to the County's road impact fee study and the City's mobility fee study. Issue # 1: Projection of Future Growth The County road impact fee study does not include any analysis of future population or employment growth. The study does not include any analysis of future vehicle miles of travel demand and does not include any analysis that demonstrates that there is a rational nexus between future growth and the need for road capacity improvements attributable to future growth. The needs test of the dual rational nexus test requires a demonstration of need for improvements and that those improvements are connected to new growth. Issue # 2: Evaluation of Existing Deficiencies The County road impact fee study does not include any analysis of existing level of service or the identification of existing over capacity roads or deficiencies. New growth is not responsible for addressing existing over capacity roads or deficiencies. The County road impact fee study makes no reference at all to existing conditions or a demonstration that new growth is not being charged for fixing existing over capacity roads. Issue # 3: Inconsistent References to Future Long -Range Plans The County road impact fee study references both the 2040 regional travel demand model and the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (Attachment A). There is no consistency through -out the document as to the use of data from either the 2040 Long Range Transportation Plan or the 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan. This has implications for the evaluation of travel on city, county, and state roads. It also has implications related to travel on the Turnpike and Interstate 95 and what adjustment factors should be utilized to not charge for travel on limited access roads. This also has implications for the calculation of the road impact fee. www.nueurbanconcepts.com Page 55 of 381 Issue # 4: Share of Vehicle Miles of Travel (VMT) The County conducted a review of the share of Vehicle Miles of Travel and prepared Table 1 on page 11 of the technical report (Attachment B). The footnote indicated that limited access facilities were excluded. No map or table was provided to illustrate what where the geographic limits of the areas evaluated. Given the City and County are both using the same model, the 44% number indicated in Table 1 cannot be replicated and is significantly higher than the analysis conducted for the City's mobility fee. This is the single biggest item of discussion between the City and County as it relates to share of fees (emphasis added). The City's mobility fee provided segment -by -segment detail to show where it derived a 15% share of vehicle miles of travel (VMT) occurring on County roads (Attachment Q. To review the County's 44% share of travel, there needs to be a map showing what areas and roads were evaluated to obtain a 44% share of travel on County roads. Second, a table of all roads evaluated that shows the road name, from, to, breakdown by maintenance entity (City, County, Developer, FDOT), number of lanes, segment length, and AADT needs to be provided to calculate the % share by maintenance entity. Without this information, it is impossible to justify a 44% of travel on County roads. Table 1 in the County report also does not indicate if the VMT data is from the base year of the model, 2020 conditions, 2040, or 2045 conditions. There is also no documentation as to why the County believes that they have authority over State Roads or what legal authority they have to charge development within the City of Port St. Lucie for travel on State Roads. If the County wants to charge development in unincorporated County for travel on State Roads, that is something the County would be required to defend if challenged. The County has no basis to charge development in the City for travel on State Roads. While only a portion of US Hwy 1 and Port St. Lucie Blvd are State Roads in the City, based on the analysis conducted for the mobility fee, these two (2) states roads had a VMT greater than all County roads in the City (Attachment D). Thus, it is essential that State Roads be separated in this analysis. Given the significant number of developer roads south of Midway Road, the County needs to clearly illustrate what share of developer funded roads are being used in the calculation of the road impact fee. There is still a larger discussion related to how to address developer roads, but the starting point needs to be knowing what % of travel on developer roads makes up the 44% share and what roads are being constructed by developers. Issue # 5: Use of City Roads in the County's road impact fee This issue has been raised numerous times in public hearings, mediation, and in meetings between the City and the County. In Table B-10 pages B-13 and B-14, there are numerous roads used and referenced in the road impact fee report that are maintained and owned by the City of Port St. Lucie, not St. Lucie County (Attachment E). The City roads are highlighted in yellow and developer roads are highlighted in green. These roads need to be either removed or noted as City and document the share of travel on City roads that the County is attempting to charge a road impact fee for. 2 Page 56 of 381 This is especially relevant if the 44% share of VMT from Table 1 is tied to the County assuming City roads are County roads for purposes of determining the 44% share of VMT (emphasis added). The table also includes numerous developer roads. The County provides developers a % credit for developer roads that address traffic from those developments. Charging new development, especially development east of Interstate 95, for develop roads west of Interstate 95 raises potential rational nexus and rough proportionality issues that will require further discussion and will need to be addressed. Issue # 6: Proposed Assessment Areas & Benefit Zones The County's report proposes changes to its current impact fee benefit zones (Attachment F). These zones are an improvement over the current single mainland zone. The zones still do not address the benefits requirement of the dual rational nexus, especially for the area of the City East of Interstate 95 and South of Midway Road. A detailed select zone analysis, with a map of the zones and a table with trip interactions, has been conducted to show travel within the City as of 2045 (Attachment G). The select zone analysis undertaken in developing the mobility fee indicates that more the 70% of all trips never leaves the City of Port St. Lucie. Further, over 10% or trips head south into Martin County, 1% of travel goes to Indian River County, another 4.5% to other counties, 4% goes into unincorporated County south of Midway Road, and only 10% travels north into unincorporated County and Ft. Pierce (Attachment H). The one exception is for development within one (1) mile of Midway Road, roughly 35% of travel heads north into Ft. Pierce and St. Lucie County (Attachment 1). However, all other areas of the City that are more than 1.75 miles south of Midway Road, feature less than 10% of trips heading north into the County and Ft. Pierce. The select zone analysis also illustrates that only 10% of future travel from development east of Interstate 95 in the City heads west across Interstate 95 (Attachment J). Whereas roughly 50% of travel from development west of Interstate 95 heads east of 1-95 into the City. The select zone analysis, the limited number of County facilities, and the needs identified in the City's mobility plan, clearly indicates that the areas of the City east of Interstate 95 and more than 1.75 miles south of Midway Road have minimal impact on any County facility. Any discussion moving forward related to assessment of County road impact fees or County benefit zones needs to treat this area different and either exclude it completely from the County road impact fee assessment and benefit district or recognize less than 10% of impact comes from this area, especially for areas of the City east of the St. Lucie River. The analysis undertaken also indicate that City development south of the C-24 canal, west of I- 95 and east of Glades Cut -Off and Range Line has limited impact on County facilities and the data and analysis does not support or justify widening Range Line Road to four (4) lanes south of Glades Cut -Off or widening Glades Cut -Off to four (4) lanes southwest of North -South Arterial A. However, development in this area has received significant road impact fee credits from the County for future development related roadways that largely benefit development in this area. M Page 57 of 381 There is also some opportunity to discuss separate assessment areas and benefit zones within the City as it relates to County road impact fees. While the proposed County benefit zones are an improvement over existing zones, based on the data and analysis, the current zones do not meet rational nexus requirements within the City of Port St. Lucie. It is recommended that the County assessment areas and benefit zones be split east and west of Interstate 95, like the City currently designates its mobility fee benefit districts. There is no rational nexus to assess development east of Interstate 95 for travel west of Interstate 95, nor is there a rational nexus to spend fees from development east of Interstate 95 on improvements west of Interstate 95. Further, it is recommended that the County assessment areas and benefit zones east of Interstate 95 shift north from St. Lucie West to 1.75 miles south of Midway Road. The select zone analysis shows travel beyond 1.75 miles south of Midway Road largely stays within the City of Port St. Lucie. The following graphic shows in red the area of the City east of I- 95 and up to 1.75 miles south of Midway Road that has up to 35% of trips using Midway and County and State roads north of Midway Road. The areas of the City in green have roughly 10% of trips using Midway and County and State roads north of Midway Road. Except for the City area northwest of Glades Cut -Off, most areas of the City west of Interstate 95 have roughly 10% of trips using Midway or County and State roads north of Midway. The northwest area has roughly 35% of trips using Midway or County and State roads north of Midway. The percentage of County road impact fees to be assessed west of Interstate 95 is subject to further discussion due to credits provided by the County for Developer roads. The appropriate percentage beyond the data and analysis beyond that provided by the City showing roughly 10% use of Midway and areas north will be influenced by the County providing a further breakdown of how it determined 44% of City trips use roads that the County is using to calculate IN Page 58 of 381 its road impact fee. Based on the City analysis, once data is broken down by City, County, State, and developer, the share of travel on County maintained roads is 15% or less of overall trips. The City may be willing to consider a different percentage share of County travel west of Interstate 95, if the County provides further transparency regarding how its share of travel is calculated. Issue # 7: Cost of Improvements The cost of improvements identified in the City's Phase One Mobility Plan are just under $1 billion (Attachment K). There have been statements made in public that the City does not include the full cost of improvements on Glades Road and Midway Road. The City's mobility plan uses a cost of roughly $20 million a mile for the urban portions of both roads (Attachment L). The County has collected over $40 million in road impact fees from the City in the last five years. That is more than adequate to cover 100% of the cost for Midway west of Interstate 95 and 50% of the cost of Glades Cut-off north of Midway. The City and County do differ on the need to widen Glades Cut -Off south of Midway Road. The Phase One Mobility Plan identified a need to add a center turn lane and raised median. The County identifies a need to four lane this portion of Glades Cut -Off. The ultimate need for Glades -Cut -Off is subject to further discussion. In summary, far more data is needed from the County to determine a defensible share of travel on County Roads. Without this information, it is not possible to discuss removing County Roads from the City Mobility Fee or determining what share of County road impact fees could be assessed in the City. The County needs to update its roads used to calculate the road impact fee and remove City roads and State roads in the City from its tables or correctly identify them as City roads and note that the County road impact fee is partially based on travel on City Roads. The City has very clearly documented how it calculated the share of travel on City, County, FDOT, 5 Page 59 of 381 and Developer roads. The County's analysis provides one table with minimal detail showing how the 44% was determined and continues to reference numerous City roads as County roads. The County also is attempting to assess development in the City for travel on State roads that the County does not fund, maintain, or own. Further discussion is also needed on the most appropriate way to address developer funded roads west of Interstate 95 for which County road impact fees have been granted. It is recommended that assessment of fees and benefit zones be split east and west of Interstate 95. It is also recommended that the assessment of fees and benefit zones differ for areas of the City east of Interstate 95 within 1.75 miles of Midway Road be different than other portions of the City east of Interstate 95 where the County has no road capacity needs identified and the City has significant road and multimodal capacity needs. Please let me know if you have any questions. 1� 6�- Rzi Jonathan B. Paul, AICP Principal Attachments Page 60 of 381 City of Port St. Lucie response to St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study January 51", 2022 ATTACHMENT A Inconsistent References to Long Range Plan County Road Impact Fee Study Prepared by NUE Urban Concepts, LLC Page 61 of 381 DRAFT differentiate trips with an origin and/or destination within the county versus trips that simply passed through the county. The analysis reviewed trips on all interstate and toll facilities within St. Lucie County, including, Interstate 95 and the Florida Turnpike (and associated on/off ramps). The limited access vehicle - miles of travel (Limited Access VMT) for trips with an origin and/or destination within the county was calculated for the identified limited access facilities. Next, the total VMT was calculated for all trips with an origin and/or destination within St. Lucie County for all roads, including limited access facilities. The I/T adjustment factor of 26.1 percent was determined by dividing the limited access VMT by the total countywide VMT for the 2040 Cost Feasible network'. By applying this factor to the VMT for each land use, the reduced VMT is then representative of only the roadways which can be funded by impact fees. Travel Adjustment Factors The road impact fee collected by St. Lucie County excludes the portion of travel occurring on municipal roadways, resulting in variations in fee levels by sub -areas. Using the TCRPM v4.1, non -city roads handle 44 percent of the VMT generated by development in Port St. Lucie based on trips that start or end in Port St. Lucie. In other words, the City's classified roadway system handles 56 percent of the travel associated with the city. Therefore, the VMT for the County impact fees collected in Port St. Lucie is adjusted to 44 percent of the full calculated VMT. It should be noted that although the VMT and cost per VMT are adjusted down to reflect 44 percent of travel, the credit calculations include the total trip length and full credit for County and State funding. This is a conservative approach, resulting in fee levels lower than 44 percent. Similarly, in Fort Pierce, non -city roads account for 96 percent of the VMT generated by development in Fort Pierce. Therefore, the VMT for the County impact fee collected in Fort Pierce and Fort Pierce Island are adjusted to 96 percent of the full calculated VMT. In the case of the Town of St. Lucie Village, because the Town does not own any roads classified as collectors and above, a differential fee is not calculated. The fees calculated for unincorporated county will also apply in the Town. z The 2040 Cost Feasible network included in the St. Lucie County Smart Moves 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan includes the current St. Lucie County roadway network and projects listed in the County's 2040 Cost Feasible Plan that are expected to be completed by 2040. Tindale Oliver St. Lucie County December 2021 10 Road Impact Fee Study Page 62 of 381 DRAFT Appendix A: Demand Component This appendix presents the detailed calculations for the demand component of the road impact fee study. Interstate & Toll Facility Adjustment Factor Table A-1 presents the interstate and toll facility adjustment factor used in the calculation of the road impact fee. This variable is based on data from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Model v4.1, specifically the 2040 projected vehicle -miles of travel of all county -generated trips on all in - county roadways. It should be noted that the adjustment factor excludes all external -to -external trips, which represent traffic that goes through St. Lucie County, but does not necessarily stop in the county. This traffic is excluded from the analysis since it does not come from development within the county. The I/T adjustment factor is used to reduce the VMT that the impact fee charges for each land use. Table A-1 Interstate/Toll Facility Adjustment Factor Source: TCRPM v4.1, 2040 Single Family Residential Trip Generation Rate Tiering As part of this study, the single family residential category is tiered to differentiate road impact fee for different home sizes. To facilitate this, an analysis is completed on the comparative relationship between housing size and household travel behavior. In addition, an analysis is completed on the travel behavior of low-income households. This analysis utilizes data from the 2017 National Household Travel Survey (NHTS) and the 2019 American Housing Survey (AHS) to examine overall trip -making characteristics of households in the United States. Table A-2 presents the trip characteristics being utilized in the road fee schedule for the single family (detached) land use. The 2017 NHTS database is used to assess average annual household Tindale Oliver St. Lucie County December 2021 A-1 Road Impact Fee Study Page 63 of 381 DRAFT Table B-10 St. Lucie County Smart Moves 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan IN Feasible Jurisdiction lin From TO improvement Lengtn Added imies Design* Capacity Capacity Capacity ot Lapacity Added Added State & Federally Funded Roads TIP 2302566 Yes State King's Hwy 500' S of SR-70 N. of Picos Rd Widen 2L to 4L 1.39 2 2.78 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 30,719 2302567 Yes State King's Hwy N. of Picos Rd N. of 1-95 Overpass Widen 2L to 4L 1.50 2 3.00 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 33,150 4383791 Yes State King's Hwy SR-9/1-95 Overpass North of Commercial Cir Widen 2L to 4L 1.46 2 2.92 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 32,266 4383792 Yes State King's Hwy North of Commercial Cir St. Lucie Blvd Widen 2L to 4L 0.53 2 1.06 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 11,713 4383793 Yes State King's Hwy St Lucie Blvd S. of Indrio Rd Widen 2L to 4L 2.53 2 5.06 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 55,913 2314402 Yes County Midway Rd S. 25th ST/SR-615 SR-5/US-1 Widen 2L to 4L 1.50 2 3.00 C&G 13,320 29,160 15,840 23,760 2314403 Yes County Midway Rd Glades Cut Off Rd Selvitz Rd Widen 2L to 4L 1.59 2 3.18 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 31,625 4317525 Yes County Port St. Lucie Blvd South of Paar Dr South of Alcantarra Blvd Widen 2L to 4L 0.94 2 1.88 C&G 16,815 37,810 20,995 19,735 4317526 Yes County 113ort St. Lucie Blvd ISouth of Alcantarra Blvd South of Darwin Blvd Widen 2L to 4L 1.39 21 2.78 C&G 1 16,815 37,8101 20,995 29,183 Roadway Needs Plan 104 County Williams Rd Shinn Rd McCarty Rd New 2 Lanes 1.52 2 3.04 C&G 0 15,930 15,930 24,214 105 Yes County Airport Connector Johnston Rd Kings Hwy New 4 Lanes 1.42 4 5.68 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 50,864 106 Yes County Airport Connector 1-95 Johnston Rd New 4 Lanes 0.78 4 3.12 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 27,940 107 DEV Developer Northern Connector Florida's Turnpike 1-95 New 4 Lanes 0.94 4 3.76 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 33,671 108 DEV Developer Arterial A Glades Cut -Off Rd Midway Rd New 4 Lanes 2.34 4 9.36 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 83,819 109 DEV Developer Becker Rd Range Line Rd N-S Road B New 4 Lanes 2.03 4 8.12 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 72,715 110 DEV Developer Community Blvd Becker Rd Discovery Way New 4 Lanes 2.80 4 11.20 C&G 0 43,740 43,740 122,472 111 DEV Developer Crosstown Pkwy Range Line Rd Village Pkwy New 4 Lanes 2.72 4 10.88 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 97,430 112 DEV Developer Discovery Way Range Line Rd N-S Road B New 2 Lanes 1.99 2 3.98 C&G 0 15,930 15,930 31,701 113 DEV Developer E-W Road 2 Community Blvd Village Pkwy New 2 Lanes 0.56 2 1.12 C&G 0 15,930 15,930 8,921 114 DEV Developer E-W Road 6 Shinn Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd New 4 Lanes 2.30 4 9.20 C&G 0 43,740 43,740 100,602 115 County Jenkins Rd N. Jenkins Rd St. Lucie Blvd New 4 Lanes 2.26 4 9.04 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 80,953 116 Yes County Jenkins Rd Post Office Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd New 4 Lanes 0.37 4 1.48 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 13,253 117 PE only County Jenkins Rd Walmart Distr. Center Altman Rd New 4 Lanes 0.81 4 3.24 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 29,014 118 County McCarty Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd Williams Rd New 4 Lanes 1.98 4 7.92 C&G 0 44,100 44,100 87,318 119 DEV Developer Newell Rd Shinn Rd Arterial A New 4 Lanes 2.54 4 10.16 C&G 0 44,100 44,100 112,014 120 County North -Mid County Conn Orange Ave Florida'a Turnpike New 4 Lanes 1.88 4 7.52 C&G 0 37,810 37,810 71,083 121 DEV Developer Tradition Pkwy Range Line Rd SW Stony Creek Way New 4 Lanes 2.05 4 8.20 C&G 0 32,110 32,110 65,826 122 County North -Mid County Conn Okeechobee Rd Orange Ave New 4 Lanes 2.93 4 11.72 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 104,953 123 County North -Mid County Conn Midway Rd Okeechobee Rd New 4 Lanes 2.37 4 9.48 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 84,893 124 DEV Developer N-S Road A Becker Rd Crosstown Pkwy New 4 Lanes 5.13 4 20.52 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 183,757 125 DEV Developer N-S Road B Becker Rd Discovery Way New 4 Lanes 2.80 4 11.20 C&G 0 43,740 43,740 122,472 126 DEV Developer Open View Dr (West) N-S Road A Village Pkwy New 4 Lanes 2.97 4 11.88 C&G 0 43,740 43,740 129,908 127 DEV Developer Paar Dr (West) N-S Road A Village Pkwy New 4 Lanes 3.30 4 13.20 C&G 0 43,740 43,740 144,342 128 DEV Developer Range Line Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd Midway Rd New 4 Lanes 5.46 4 21.84 C&G 0 37,810 37,810 206,443 129 DEV Developer Shinn Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd Midway Rd New 4 Lanes 4.95 4 19.80 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 177,309 130 DEV Developer Westcliffe Ln N-S Road A SW Tremonte Ave New 4 Lanes 1.15 4 4.60 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 41,193 131 DEV Developer Williams Ext. McCarty Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd New 4 Lanes 1.65 4 6.60 C&G 0 44,100 44,100 72,765 132 County Bayshore Blvd St. Lucie West Blvd Selvitz Rd Widen 2L to 4L 1.46 2 2.92 C&G 13,320 29,160 15,840 23,126 133 County California Blvd Savona Blvd Del Rio Blvd Widen 2L to 4L 1.33 2 2.66 C&G 16,815 37,810 20,995 27,923 134 DEV Developer Discovery Way N-S Road B Village Pkwy Widen 2L to 4L 1.31 2 2.62 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 26,056 135 County East Torino Pkwy NW Cashmere Blvd Midway Rd Widen 2L to 4L 2.73 2 5.46 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 54,300 136 County Glades Cut -Off Rd Arterial A Selvitz Rd Widen 2L to 4L 5.39 2 10.78 C&G 15,045 33,830 18,785 101,251 Tindale Oliver December 2021 B-13 St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study Page 64 of 381 City of Port St. Lucie response to St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study January 51", 2022 ATTACHMENT 6 Table 1 County Road Impact Fee Study Prepared by NUE Urban Concepts, LLC Page 65 of 381 DRAFT Table 1 Travel Adjustment Factor � a . a . .j . Port St.Lucie Generated Vehicle -Miles of Travel Port St. Lucie 1,177,101 56% County/State/Other 924,898 44% Total 2,101,999 100% Fort Pierce Generated Vehicle -Miles of Travel Fort Pierce 46,507 4% County/State/Other 1,030,510 96% Total 1,077,017 100% Source: Treasure Coast Regional Planning Model (TCRPM v4.1) Note: All references to VMT refer to Port St. Lucie or Fort Pierce generated VMT on classified roads for trips beginning or ending in each respective city. Interstate/toll facilities are excluded from the calculations. Tindale Oliver December 2021 11 St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study Page 66 of 381 City of Port St. Lucie response to St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study January 51", 2022 ATTACHMENT C Traffic Data City Mobility Fee Technical Report Prepared by NUE Urban Concepts, LLC Page 67 of 381 APPENDIX I: CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS DATA Name FranStreet TO Street Functional Classlliotlpn Mai -ping Entity Travel lanes Speed LimA len8tlr LOS Standard AADT DaiN Capacity Year C-M Growth Factors 2020 AADT 2020 VMT 2020 VMC 2045 AADT 2045 VMT 2045 VMC AIROSO BLVD PO FIT ST LUCI E BLVD THORNHILLDR MajorArtenal CITY 4 40 0.93 E 15,500 39,800 2019 0.0183 15,754 14,637 36,909 25,292 23A55 36,909 AIROSO BLVD THORNHIU. DR CROSSTOWN PKWY MajorArterial CITY 4 40 0.82 E 15,500 39,800 2019 0.0183 15,754 12,916 32,568 25,292 20,696 32,568 AIROSO BLVD CROSSTOWN PKWY PRI MA VISTA BLVD Major Arterial CITY 4 40 1.42 E 15,827 39,800 2017 0.0183 16,606 23,779 56,684 26,753 38,103 56,684 AIROSO BLVD PRIMA VISTA BLVD FLORESTA DR Major Arterial CITY 4 40 0.55 E 14,344 39,800 2017 0.0183 15,050 1 8,352 21,968 24,247 13,383 21,968 AIROSO BLVD FLO RESTA DR STIAMES DR MajorArtenal CITY 4 40 0.51 E 21,000 39,800 2019 0.0183 21,344 11,010 20,492 34,266 17,643 20,492 ALCANTARRA BLVD SW PARSONS ST PORTST LUCIE BLVD Collector CITY 1 2 1 30 0.81 D 3,600 14,800 2019 0.0183 3,659 2,968 11,983 5,874 4,756 11,983 BAYSHORE BLVD MOUNTWELLST PORTST LUCIE BLVD Collector CITY 2 35 0.80 D 6,000 17,700 2019 0.0183 6,098 4,914 14,235 9,790 7,873 14,235 BAYSHORE BLVD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD THORNHILLDR Arterial CITY 4 40 0.45 E 28,260 39,800 2018 0.0183 29,187 13,199 17,933 46,941 21,151 17,933 BAYSHORE BLVD THORNHIU. DR CROSSTOWN PKWY Arterial CITY 4 40 1.28 E 22,081 39,800 2017 0.0183 23,167 29,804 50,925 37,325 47,758 50,925 BAYSHORE BLVD CROSSTOWN PKWY PRI MA VISTA BLVD Arterial CITY 4 40 1.48 E 27,000 39,800 2019 0.0183 27,443 40,614 58,792 44,056 65,080 58,792 BAYSHORE BLVD PRIMA VISTA BLVD FLORESTA DR Arterial CITY 2 40 0.67 E 17,500 17,700 2019 0.0183 17,787 11,950 11,869 28,555 19,148 11,869 BAYSHORE BLVD FLO RESTA DR SELVITZ RD Arterial CITY 2 40 0.70 E 13,000 17,700 1 20191 0.0183 13,213 9,279 12,406 21,212 14,868 12A06 BAYSHORE BLVD SELVITZ RD STIAMES DR Arterial CITY 2 40 0.92 E 13,000 17,700 2019 0.0183 13,213 12,212 16,328 21,212 19,568 16,328 BECKER BLVD ESNOW RD FLORESTA DR Arterial CITY 2 40 2.24 E I6,000 17,700 2019 0.0183 16,262 36,526 39,681 26,107 58,529 39,681 BECKER RD SOUTHBEND BLVD VIATESORO Arterial CITY 1 2 1 40 0.22 E 1 15,000 17,700 2019 0.0183 15,246 1 3,360 3,894 24,476 5,385 3,894 BECKER RD VILLAGE PKWY 1-95 Arterial CITY 6 45 0.77 E 2,500 59,900 2017 0.0437 2,828 2,182 46,228 8,598 6,636 46,228 BECKER RD 1-95 SAVONA BLVD Arterial CITY 4 40 1.03 E 21,000 39,800 2019 0.0183 21,344 22,009 40,963 34,266 35,267 40,963 BECKER RD SAVONA BLVD PORTST LUCIE BLVD Arterial CITY 4 40 0.71 E 18,000 39,800 2019 0.0183 18,295 13,085 28,412 29,371 20,967 28,412 BECKER RD PORT ST LUCI E BLVD ALBACORE ST Arterial CITY 4 40 0.61 E 13,500 39,800 2019 0.0183 13,721 8,362 24,209 22,028 13,399 24,209 BECKER RD ALBACORE ST DARWINBLVD Arterial CITY 4 40 0.37 E 13,500 39,800 1 20191 0.0183 13,721 5,064 14,661 22,028 8,115 14,661 BECKER RD DARWINBLVD ATHENA DR Arterial CITY 4 40 0.71 E 15,000 39,800 2019 0.0183 15,246 10,778 28,084 24,476 17,271 28,084 BECKER RD ATHENA DR FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE Arterial CITY 4 40 0.68 E 15,000 39,800 2019 0.0183 15,246 1 10,363 27,004 24,476 16,606 27,004 BECKER RD F LORI DA'S TURNPIKE SOUTHBEND BLVD Arterial CITY 4 40 0.32 E 20,000 39,800 2019 0.0183 20,328 6,595 12,887 32,634 10,567 12,887 BECKER RD VIATESORO GILSON RD Arterial CITY 2 40 2.00 E 15,000 17,700 2019 0.0183 15,246 30,549 35,400 24,476 48,952 35A00 CAU FORNIA BLVD CAMEO BLVD DELRIO BLVD Coll-, CITY 2 40 0.39 D 7,813 17,700 2018 0.0183 8,069 3,121 6,822 12,978 5,002 6,822 CAU FORNIA BLVD DEL RI BLVD SAVONA BLVD Collector CITY 2 40 0.77 D 14,000 17,700 2019 0.0183 14,230 11,047 13,715 22,844 17,701 13,715 CAU FORNIA BLVD SAVONA BLVD DELRIO BLVD Arterial CITY 2 40 1.33 E 12,500 17,700 2019 0.0183 12,705 16,915 23,521 20,396 27,104 23,521 CALIFORNIA BLVD DELRIO BLVD CROSSTOWN PKWY Arterial CITY 2 40 0.37 E 15,000 17,700 2019 0.0183 15,246 5,717 6,624 24,476 9,160 6,624 CAU FORNIA BLVD CROSSTOWN PKWY HEATHERWOOD BLVD Arterial CITY 2 40 0.47 E 19,500 17,700 2019 0.0183 19,820 9,236 8,233 31,818 14,799 8,233 CAU FORNIA BLVD HEATHERWOO D BLVD ST LUCI E WEST BLVD Arterial CITY 2 40 0.85 E 19,500 17,700 20191 0.0183 19,820 16,952 15,110 31,818 27,163 15,110 CAU FORNIA BLVD ST LUCI E WEST BLVD CO UNTRY CLUB DR Arterial CITY 2 40 0.35 E 9,100 17,700 2019 0.0183 9,249 3,234 6,177 14,849 5,182 6,177 CAU FORNIA BLVD CO UNTRY CLUB DR UNIVERS ITY BLVD Arterial CITY 2 40 0.34 E 7,800 17,700 2019 0.0183 7,928 2,667 5,943 12,727 4,273 5,943 CAU F ORNIA BLVD UNI VERSITY BLVD PEACOCK BLVD Arterial CITY 2 40 1.00 E 7,800 17,700 2019 0.0183 7,928 7,923 17,656 12,727 12,696 17,656 CAU FORNIA BLVD PEACOCK BLVD TORINO PKWY Arterial CITY 2 40 0.37 E 13,000 17,700 2019 0.0183 13,213 4,894 6,544 21,212 7,843 6,544 CAMEO BLVD PORT ST LUICE BLVD CALIFORNIA BLVD Collector CITY 2 30 0.90 D 4,600 14,800 2019 0.0183 4,675 4,199 13,266 7,506 6,728 13,266 CAMEO BLVD CALIFORNIA BLVD CROSSTOWN PKWY Collecor CITY 2 30 0.84 D 9,319 14,800 2018 0.0183 9,625 8,107 12,421 15,479 12,991 12A21 CANE SLOUGH RD us LENNARD RD Arterial CITY 6 35 0.22 E 9,772 59,900 2016 0.013 10,280 2,262 13,180 14,383 3,165 13,180 CASHMERE BLVD DELRIO BLVD CROSSTOWN PKWY Collecor CITY 2 40 0.38 D 10,021 17,700 20181 0.0183 10,350 3,920 6,679 16,645 6,281 6,679 CASHMERE BLVD CROSSTOWN PKWY HEATHERWOOD BLVD Collector CITY 2 40 0.49 D 13,000 17,700 2019 0.0183 13,213 6,531 8,732 21,212 10,465 8,732 CASHMERE BLVD HEATHERWOOD BLVD ST LUCI E WEST BLVD Collector CITY 2 40 1.24 D 13,000 17,700 2019 0.0183 13,213 16,399 21,926 21,212 26,277 21,926 CASHMERE BLVD ST LUCI E WEST BLVD SWAN LAKE CIRCLE Collecor CITY 2 40 0.51 D 14,000 17,700 2019 0.0183 14,230 7,326 9,095 22,844 11,738 9,095 CASHMERE BLVD SWAN LAKE CIRCLE PEACOCK BLVD Collector CITY 2 40 1.20 D 14,000 17,700 2019 0.0183 14,230 17,128 21,265 22,844 27,445 21,265 CASHMERE BLVD PEACOCK BLVD TORINO PKWY Collector CITY 2 40 0.30 D 10,159 17,700 2018 0.0183 IOA92 3,147 5,290 16,875 5,043 5,290 COMMERCE CENTER DR CROSSTOWN PKWY ST LUCI E WEST BLVD Collector HOA 4 35 2.13 D 5,819 32,400 2017 0.0437 6,582 14,040 69,114 20,013 42,691 69,114 COM M E RCE CENTER DR ST LUCI E WEST BLVD CANAL Arterial CITY 2 45 2.10 E 7,500 17,700 2019 0.0437 7,828 16,464 37,229 23,802 50,062 37,229 COMMERCE CENTER DR CANAL GLADES CUT-OFF RD Arterial CITY 2 45 1.03 E 7,500 17,700 2019 0.0437 7,828 8,042 18,185 23,802 24,453 18,185 COMMUNITY BLVD WESTCUFFEW TRADITION PKWY Major Arterial CITY 4 35 1.20 E 5,317 39,800 2017 0.0437 6,014 7,223 47,803 18,287 21,964 47,803 CROSSTOWN PKWY VILLAGE PKWY I-95 MajorArterial CITY 6 45 1.32 E 16,233 59,900 2016 0.0437 19,071 25,243 79,287 57,987 76,755 79,287 CROSSTOWN PKWY 1-95 CALIFORNIA BLVD MajorArterial CITY 6 45 1.11 E 24,500 59,900 2020 0.0183 24,500 27,100 66,257 39,259 43A25 66,257 CROSSTOWN PKWY CALIFORNIA BLVD CASHMERE BLVD MajorArterial CITY 6 45 1.01 E 25,000 59,900 2020 0.0183 25,000 1 25,158 60,278 40,060 40,313 60,278 CROSSTOWN PKWY CASHM ERE BLVD CAMEO BLVD Major Arterial CITY 6 45 0.54 E 26,500 59,900 2019 0.0183 26,935 14,576 32,355 43,241 23,356 32,355 CROSSTOWN PKWY CAMEO BLVD BAYSHORE BLVD MajorArterial CITY 6 45 0.45 E 30,500 59,900 2019 0.0183 31,000 13,853 26,718 49,767 22,199 26,718 CROSSTOWN PKWY BAYSHORE BLVD AIROSO BLVD MajorArtenal CITY 6 45 1.11 E 25,000 59,900 2020 0.0183 25,000 27,789 66,583 40,060 44,529 66,583 CROSSTOWN PKWY AIROSO BLVD SANDIA DR MajorArterial CITY 6 45 0.48 E 5,400 59,900 20161 0.0183 5,754 2,796 28,903 9,286 4,481 28,903 CROSSTOWN PKWY SANDIA DR MANTH LN Major Arterial CITY 6 45 0.25 E 6ADO 59,900 2016 0.0183 6,820 1,703 14,851 11,006 2,729 14,851 CROSSTOWN PKWY MANTHA LN SE FLORESTA DR MajorArterial CITY 6 45 0.72 E 4,700 59,900 2016 0.0183 5,008 3,624 43,038 8,083 5,807 43,038 CROSSTOWN PKWY FLO RESTA DR ST LUCIE RIVER MajorArterial CITY 6 45 0.66 E 25,500 59,900 2019 0.013 25,832 17,157 39,785 36,141 24,004 39,785 CROSSTOWN PKWY ST LUCIE RIVER us MajorArterial CITY 6 45 0.57 E 25,500 59,900 2019 0.013 25,832 14,789 34,293 36,141 20,690 34,293 DARWINBLVD BECKER RD PAARDR Collector CITY 2 40 1.25 D 7,298 17,700 2018 0.0183 7,537 9A22 22,044 12,122 15,098 22,044 DARWINBLVD PAARDR TULIP BLVD Collector CITY 2 40 1.17 D 7,298 17,700 2018 0.0183 7,537 8,834 20,669 12,122 14,155 20,669 DARWINBLVD TULIP BLVD PORT ST LUCI E BLVD Coll.- CITY 2 30 1.08 D 13,500 14,800 1 2019 0.0183 13,721 14,789 15,922 22,028 23,698 15,922 DEL RIO BLVD PORT ST LUCI E BLVD CALIFORNIA BLVD Collector CITY 2 40 0.90 D 8,300 17,700 2019 0.0183 8,233 7,393 15,865 13,217 11,846 1 15,865 DEL RIO BLVD CALIFORNIA BLVD CASHMERE BLVD Collector CITY 2 40 0.89 D 8AOO 17,700 2019 0.0183 8,538 7,575 15,674 13,706 12,138 15,674 DEL RIO BLVD CASHMERE BLVD CALIFORNIA BLVD Collector CITY 2 40 1.00 D 4,800 17,700 2017 0.0183 5,036 5,082 17,766 8,114 8,144 17,766 EASTTORINO PKWY CAUFORNIABLVD NWEASTTORINO PKWY Coll.- CITY 2 40 2.61 D 3,000 17,700 2019 0.0183 3,049 7,977 46,218 4,895 12,782 46,218 EASTTORINO PKWY CASHMERE BLVD CALIFORNIA BLVD Arterial CITY 2 40 1.00 E 7,800 17,700 2018 0.0183 8,056 8,092 17,715 12,956 12,967 17,715 EASTTORINO PKWY CASHMERE BLVD TORINO PKWY Arterial CITY 2 1 40 1.56 E 11,500 17,700 2020 0.0183 11,500 17,957 27,638 18,428 28,774 27,638 EASTTORINO PKWY TORINO PKWY MIDWAYRD Arterial CITY 2 40 0.88 E 14,500 17,700 2020 0.0183 14,500 12,744 15,557 23,235 20A21 15,557 FLORESTADR OAKLYNST PORTSTLUCIEBLVD Arterial CITY 2 35 0.61 E 13,000 15,600 20191 0.0183 13,213 8,063 9,502 21,212 12,920 9,502 FLORESTADR PORTSTLUCIEBLVD THORNHILLDR Arterial CITY 2 40 0.67 E 12,500 17,700 2019 0.0183 12,705 8,507 11,830 20,396 13,632 11,830 FLORESTADR ITHORNHILLDR CROSSTOWN PKWY Arterial CITY 2 40 0.98 E 12,500 17,700 2019 0.0183 12,705 12A22 17,274 20,396 19,906 17,274 FLORESTA DR CROSSTOWN PKWY PRI MA VISTA BLVD Arterial CITY 2 40 1.34 E I1,000 17,700 2019 0.0183 11,180 15,046 23,776 17,949 24,110 23,776 FLORESTA DR PRIMA VISTA BLVD AIROSO BLVD Arterial CITY 2 40 0.86 E 9,600 17,700 2019 0.0183 9,757 8,375 15,165 15,664 13,421 15,165 FLORESTA DR AIROSO BLVD SELVITZ RD Collect" CITY 2 35 1.07 D 4,467 17,700 2018 0.0183 4,614 4,975 19,018 7,420 7,972 19,018 FLORESTA DR SELVITZ RD BAYSHORE BLVD Collector CITY 2 35 0.30 D 4A67 17,700 2018 0.0183 4,614 1,377 5,263 7,420 2,206 5,263 FLORIDATURNPIKE COUNTY LINE PORTST LUCIE BLVD Umited Aaess STATE 4 70 4.98 D 50,309 74,400 74AOO 2020 0.0174 50,309 250,539 370,512 78,783 392,338 370,512 FLORIDATURNPIKE PORT ST LUCI E BLVD MIDWAYRD Umited Access STATE 4 70 7.35 D 37,600 20201 0.0174 37,600 276,360 546,840 58,881 432,773 546,840 GATLIN BLVD WOF I-95 EOF I-95 MajorArterial CITY 6 45 0.32 E 40,641 59,900 2017 0.0183 45,969 13,509 18,875 68,698 21,647 18,875 GATLIN BLVD EOF I-95 SAVAGE BLVD Major Arterial CITY 6 45 0.60 E 40,641 59,900 2017 0.0183 42,641 25,779 36,018 68,698 41,308 36,018 GATLIN BLVD SAVAGE BLVD ROSSERBLVD Major Arterial CITY 6 45 0.63 E 40,641 59,900 2017 0.0183 42,641 27,211 38,018 68,698 43,602 38,018 GATLIN BLVD ROSSERBLVD SAVONA BLVD MajorArtenal CITY 6 45 0.72 E 40,641 59,900 2017 0.0183 42,641 30,794 43,024 68,698 49,344 43,024 GATLIN BLVD SAVONA BLVD PORTST LUCIE BLVD MajorArterial CITY 6 45 0.88 E 40,641 59,900 2017 0.0183 42,641 37,716 52,696 68,698 60,436 52,696 GIISONRD MARTIN C.L BECKERRD Arterial COUNTY 2 30 0.28 E I1,000 15,600 2019 0.0183 11,180 3,166 4A09 17,949 5,073 4A09 Prepared by: NUE Urban Concepts Version 1.1: 9/7/213 Page 68 of 381 APPENDIX I: CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS DATA Name From Street TO Street Functional ClassBloOon Maintaining Entity Travel lanes Speed LimA Length LOS Standard AADTM,,Y CaPadty Year C-M Growth Factors 2020 AADT 2020 VMT 2020 VMC 2045 AADT 2045 VMT 2045 VMC GI LSON RD BECKER RD LAKERI DGE DR Arterial COUNTY 2 30 1.24 E 11,000 15,600 2019 0.0183 11,180 13,887 19,340 17,949 22,252 19,340 GLADES CUT-OFF RD SOUTHERN TERMINUS CARLTON RD Collector COUNTY 2 SO 2.03 D 2,833 17,700 2017 0.0437 3,204 6,494 35,871 9,744 19,746 35,871 GLADES CUT-OFF RD CARLTON RD RANGE LINE RD Collector COUNTY 2 50 2.19 D 2,833 17,700 2017 0.0437 3,204 7,026 38,808 9,744 21,363 38,808 GLADES CUT-OFF RD RANGE LINE RD RESERVE BLVD Arterial COUNTY 2 50 3.73 E 2,933 17,700 2017 0.0437 3,204 1 11,965 66,091 9,744 36,382 66,091 GLADES CUT-OFF RD RESERVE BLVD COMMERCE CENTER DR Arterial COUNTY 2 50 0.88 E 3,585 17,700 2016 0.0437 4,212 3,688 15,499 12,806 11,214 15,499 GLADESCUT-OFFRD COMMERCE CENTER DR 1-95 Arterial COUNTY 2 50 1.26 E 2,770 17,700 2017 0.0437 3,133 3,952 22,326 9,527 12,017 22,326 GLADES CUT-OFF RD 1-95 MIDWAYRD Arterial COUNTY 2 50 1.85 E 2,770 17,700 2017 0.0183 2,906 SA14 32,795 4,682 8,675 32,795 GRAND DR SW WALTON RD SETIFFANYAVE Collector CITY 2 30 0.38 D 950 14,800 2019 0.013 962 365 5,613 1,346 511 5,613 GRAND DR SETIFFANY AVE SE LENARD RD Coll-, CITY 2 30 1.16 D 950 14,800 2019 0.013 962 1,116 17,165 1,346 1,562 17,165 GREEN RIVER PKWY MARTINGL CHARLESTON DR Collector CITY 2 40 0.69 D 4,759 17,700 2018 0.013 4,883 3,354 12,158 6,831 4,692 12,158 GREEN RIVER PKWY CHARLESTON DR MELALEUCA BLVD Collector CITY 2 40 0.90 D 4,759 17,700 2018 0.013 4,883 4A01 15,955 6,831 6,158 15,955 GREEN RIVER PKWY MELALEUCA BLVD WALTON RD Collector CITY 2 40 1.06 D 4,759 17,700 2018 0.013 4,883 5,180 18,777 6,831 7,247 18,777 HEATHERWOOD BLVD SWCALIFORNIABLVD SW CASHMERE BLVD Collector CITY 2 30 1.09 D 3,600 14,800 2019 0.0183 3,659 4,001 16,151 5,874 6,411 16,151 I MPORT DR SW SAVAGE BLVD SW GATLIN BLVD Collector CITY 2 30 2.21 D 1,800 14,800 2019 0.0183 1,830 1 4,043 32,644 2,937 6,478 32,644 I NDIAN RIVER DR COUNTY LINE ROAD WALTON ROAD Arterial COUNTY 2 35 2.77 D 7,400 14,800 2019 0.013 7A96 20,751 40,968 10,488 29,032 40,918 I NDIAN RIVER DR WALTON ROAD WALTON SCRUB PRESERVE Arterial COUNTY 2 35 0.82 D 4,270 14,800 2020 0.013 4,270 3,501 12,135 5,974 4,898 12,135 1-95 COUNTY LINE GATLIN BLVD Umited Access STATE 6 70 4.34 D 65,275 123,600 2020 0.0174 65,275 283,130 536,114 102,219 443,374 536,114 1-95 GATLIN BLVD ST LUCI E WEST BLVD Umited Access STATE 6 70 3.45 D 80,500 123,600 2020 0.0174 80,500 277,453 426,003 126,061 434,485 426,003 1-95 ST LUCI E WEST BLVD MIDWAYRD Umited Access STATE 6 70 4.40 D 60,386 123,600 2020 0,0174 60,386 265,442 543,316 94,563 415,676 543,316 JENNINGS RD us LENNARD RD Collector CITY 4 35 0.48 D 4,600 39,800 1 20161 0.013 4,839 2,327 19,143 6,770 3,256 19,143 LAKEHURST DR SW BAYSHORE RD SW AIROSO BLVD Collector CITY 2 35 1.30 D 2,100 17,700 2019 0.0183 2,134 2,776 22,978 3,427 4,448 22,978 LAKEHURST DR SW AIROSO BLVD SANDAAVE Collector CITY 2 35 0.27 D 2,100 17,700 2019 0.0183 2,134 585 4,841 3,427 937 4,841 LENNARD RD USI MARIPOSAAVE Arterial CITY 4 40 0.38 E 18,500 39,800 2019 0.013 18,741 7,173 15,233 26,220 10,035 15,233 LENNARD RD MARI POSA AVE MEIALEUCA BLVD Arterial CITY 4 40 0.37 E 18,500 39,800 2019 0.013 18,741 7,009 14,885 26,220 9,806 14,885 LENNARD RD MEIALEUCA BLVD JENNINGS RD Arterial CITY 4 40 0.13 E 18,500 39,800 2019 0.013 18,741 2,414 5,126 26,220 3,377 5,126 LENNARD RD JENNI NGS RD HILLMOORDR Arterial CITY 4 40 0.35 E 18,500 39,800 2019 0.013 18,741 6,636 14,094 26,220 9,285 14,094 LENNARD RD HILLMOOR DR TIFFANY AVE Arterial CITY 4 40 0.68 E 18,500 39,800 2019 0.013 18,741 12,835 27,258 26,220 17,957 27,258 LENNARD RD TIFFANYAVE WALTON RD Arterial CITY 4 40 0.37 E 5,765 39,800 1 20161 0.013 6,065 2,263 14,849 8,485 3,166 14,849 LENNARD RD WALTON RD S OF SAVANNA CLUB BLVD Arterial CITY 2 30 0.79 E 4,455 15,600 2016 0.013 4,687 3,706 12,335 6,557 5,185 12,335 LYNGATE DR VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY MORNI NGSIDE BLVD Collector CITY 2 35 0.46 D 9,400 17,700 2020 0.013 SA00 1 4,329 8,152 13,151 6,057 8,152 LYNGATE DR MORN NGSIDE BLVD us Collector CITY 2 35 0.16 D 9ADO 17,700 2020 0.013 9A00 1A62 2,754 13,151 2,046 2,754 MANVILLE DR NW SELVITZ RD STJAM ES DR Collector CITY 2 30 0.88 D 1,250 14,800 2019 0.0183 1,271 1,123 13,061 2,040 1,800 13,061 MARIPOSA AVE LENNARD RD HALLAHAN ST Coll-, CITY 2 30 1.13 D 6,400 14,800 2019 0.013 6,483 7,342 16,761 9,071 10,273 16,761 MCCARTY RD GLADES CUTOFF ROAD OKEECHOBEE RD Collector COUNTY 2 35 3.19 D 400 14,800 2019 0.0437 417 1,333 47,256 1,269 4,053 47,256 M ELALEUCA BLVD LENNARD RD GREEN RIVER PKWY Collector CITY 2 30 1.74 D 9,804 14,800 2018 0.013 10,059 17,510 25,762 14,073 24A97 25,762 MIDWAYRD OKEECHOBEE RD SHI NN RD Arterial COUNTY 4 50 0.88 E 4,600 17,700 2019 0.0437 4,801 4,243 15,644 14,599 12,903 15,644 MIDWAYRD SHI NN RD MCCARTYRD Arterial COUNTY 2 45 1.52 E 5,118 17,700 2017 0.0437 5,789 8,773 26,823 17,602 26,675 26,823 MIDWAYRD MCCARTY RD NIS ARTE RI ALA Arterial COUNTY 2 45 1.49 E 5,118 17,700 2017 0.0437 5,789 8,651 26,452 17,602 26,306 26A52 MIDWAYRD N/S ARTERI ALA 1-95 Arterial COUNTY 2 45 0.93 E 5,118 17,700 2017 0.0437 5,789 5,394 16A93 17,602 16A02 16A93 MIDWAYRD 1-95 GLADES CUT-OFF RD Arterial COUNTY 4 45 1.00 E 16,655 39,800 2017 0.0183 17,474 17,534 39,720 28,153 28,096 39,720 MIDWAYRD GLADES CUT-OFF RD EAST TORINO PKWY Arterial COUNTY 4 45 0.28 E 21,500 39,800 2020 0.0183 21,500 6,041 11,184 34,451 9,681 11,184 MIDWAYRD EASTTORINO PKWY MILNERDR Arterial COUNTY 2 45 0.56 E 22,500 17,700 2020 0.0183 22,500 12,629 9,935 36,054 20,237 9,935 MIDWAYRD MILNERDR WOFSELVITZRD Arterial COUNTY 2 45 0.67 E 22,500 17,700 2020 0.0183 22,500 15,173 11,936 36,054 24,313 11,936 MIDWAYRD WOF SELVITZ RD SELVITZ RD Arterial COUNTY 2 45 0.08 E 22,500 39,800 2020 0.0183 22,500 1,805 3,193 36,054 2,893 3,193 MIDWAYRD SELVITZ S25TH ST Arterial COUNTY 4 45 1.03 E 16,200 39AOO 2019 0.0183 16,466 16,961 40,921 26,434 27,178 10,921 MIDWAYRD S25TH ST ST LUCIE RIVER Arterial COUNTY 4 35 0.48 E 18,100 39,800 2019 0.013 18,335 8,800 19,102 25,653 12,312 19,102 MORNINGSI DE BLVD SW WESTCHESTER DR WESTMORELAND BLVD Collector CITY 2 25 1.22 D 3,000 14,800 2019 0.013 3,039 3,703 18,034 4,252 5,181 18,034 MORNINGSI DE BLVD WESTMORELAND BLVD PORT ST LUCI E BLVD Collector CITY 2 35 1.12 D 2,654 17,700 2017 0.013 2,758 3,098 19,884 3,858 4,334 19,884 MORNINGSI DE BLVD PORT ST LUCI E BLVD LYNGATE DR Collector CITY 2 25 1.06 D 2,900 14,800 2020 0.013 2,900 3,084 15,741 4,057 4,315 15,741 OAKRI DGE DR SE OAKLYN ST SWMOUNTWELLST Collector CITY 2 35 0.81 D 5,000 14,800 2019 0.0183 5,082 4,106 11,934 8,159 6579 11,934 PARR DR ROSSERBLVD SAVONA BLVD Collector CITY 2 40 1.03 D 1,108 17,700 2016 0,0183 1,181 1,225 18,240 1,905 1,964 18,240 PARR DR SAVONA BLVD FOUST LUCIE BLVD Collector CITY 2 40 0.76 D 1,108 17,700 2016 0.0183 1,181 908 13,514 1,905 1A55 13,514 PARR DR PORT ST LUCI E BLVD DARWIN BLVD Collector CITY 2 40 1.04 D 1,108 17,700 2016 0.0183 1,181 1,233 18,351 1,905 1,976 18,351 PARR DR DARWIN BLVD TULIP BLVD Collector CITY 2 40 2.03 D 1,900 17,700 2019 0.0183 1,931 3,929 35,943 3,100 6,296 35,943 PEACHTREE BLVD ST LAMES DR NW SELVITZ RD Collector CITY 2 30 0.51 D 2,800 14,800 2019 0,0183 2,846 1A63 7,596 4,569 2,345 7,596 PEACOCK BLVD ST LUCI E WEST BLVD UNIVERS ITY BLVD Collector CITY 4 40 0.70 D 15,534 39,800 2017 0.0183 16,298 11,473 27,867 26,258 18,385 27,867 PEACOCK BLVD UNIVERSITY BLVD CALIFORNIA BLVD Collector CITY 2 40 1.23 D 10,000 17,700 2019 0.0183 10,164 12,543 21,802 16,317 20,099 21,802 PEACOCK BLVD GALIFORNIA BLVD CASHMERE BLVD Collector CITY 2 40 1.04 D 4,717 17,700 2017 0.0183 4,949 5,169 18,387 7,973 8,283 18,387 PORTST LUCIE BLVD MARTINGL. BECKERRD Arterial CITY 4 40 0.23 E 15,868 39,800 2017 0.0183 16,649 3,906 9,286 26,823 6,258 9,286 PORTST LUCIE BLVD BECKER RD PAARDR Arterial CITY 2 40 1.19 E 15,868 17,700 2017 0.0183 16,649 19,837 20,975 26,823 31,786 20,975 PORT ST LUCIE BLVD PAARDR TULIP BLVD Arterial CITY 2 40 1.16 E 15,868 17,700 2017 0.0183 16,649 19,452 20,569 26,823 31,170 20,569 PORTSTLUCIE BLVD TUUPBLVD DARWIN BLVD Arterial CITY 2 40 0.53 E 15,868 17,700 2017 0.0183 16,649 1 8,818 9,324 26,823 14,130 9,324 PORTSTLUCIE BLVD DARWINBLVD GATLINBLVD MajorArterial CITY 4 40 0.58 E 32,000 39,800 2019 0.0183 32,525 19,056 23,275 52,215 30,535 23,275 PORT ST LUCIE BLVD GATLIN BLVD DELRIO BLVD MajorArterial CITY 6 45 0.90 E 38,000 59,900 2019 0.0183 38,623 34,948 54,100 52,005 56,001 54,100 PORTSTLUCIE BLVD DELRIO BLVD CAM EO BLVD MajorArtedal CITY 6 45 0.39 E 47,644 59,900 20171 0.0183 49,988 19,365 23,080 80,536 31,031 23,080 PORTSTLUCIE BLVD CAMEO BLVD FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE MajorArterial CITY 6 45 0.24 E 47,644 59,900 2017 0.0183 49,988 12,201 1 14,541 80,536 1 19550 14,541 PORTST LUCIE BLVD FLORIDA'S TURNPIKE BAYSHORE BLVD MajorArterial STATE 6 45 0.17 E 47,644 59,900 2017 0.0183 49,988 8,758 IOA38 80,536 14,033 IOA38 PORTST LUCIE BLVD BAYSHORE BLVD AIROSO BLVD MajorArterial STATE 6 45 0.84 E 48,955 59,900 2017 0.0183 51,364 43,578 50,546 82,752 69,829 50,546 PORTST LUCIE BLVD AIROSO BLVD FLORESTA DR Major Arterial STATE 6 45 0.62 E 49,175 59,900 2017 0.0183 51,594 32,398 37,410 83,124 51,914 37,410 PORT ST LUCIE BLVD FLORESTA DR ST LUCIE RIVER Major Arterial STATE 6 45 0.61 E 61,616 59,900 2017 0.013 64,019 38,900 36,397 89,568 54,425 36,397 PORTST LUCIE BLVD ST LUCIE RIVER VETERANS MEMORIALPKWY MajorArterial STATE 6 45 0.27 E 61,616 59,900 2017 0.013 64,019 17A35 16,313 89,568 24,393 16,313 PORTST LUCIE BLVD VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY MORNINGSIDE BLVD MajorArterial STATE 6 45 1.25 E 41,526 59,900 2017 0.013 43,146 53,772 74,653 60,364 75,232 74,653 PORTST LUCIE BLVD MORNINGSIDE BLVD us Major Arterial STATE 6 45 0.56 E 40,456 59,900 20171 0.013 42,034 23,582 33,605 58,809 32,993 33,605 PRIMAVISTA BLVD BAYSHORE BLVD AIROSO BLVD Arterial CITY 4 40 1.35 E 21,500 39,800 2020 0.013 21,500 29,040 53,757 30,080 40,629 53,757 PRIMAVISTA BLVD AIROSO BLVD FLORESTA DR Arterial COUNTY 4 40 0.58 E 25A25 39,800 2018 0.013 26,259 1 15,190 1 23,176 36,497 1 21,253 23,176 PRIMAVISTA BLVD FLO RESTA DR NARANJAAVE Arterial COUNTY 4 40 0.40 E 26,500 39,800 2019 0.013 26,935 10,809 16,026 37,558 15,123 16,026 PRIMAVISTA BLVD NARANIA AVE ST LUCIE RIVER Arterial COUNTY 4 40 0.33 E 26,500 39,800 2019 0.013 26,845 8,811 13,063 37,558 12,327 13,063 PRIMA VISTA BLVD ST LUCIE RIVER US HWYI Arterial COUNTY 4 40 0.66 E 26,500 39,800 2019 0.013 26,845 5,730 8,495 37,558 8,017 8A95 RANGE LINE RD MARTIN COUNTY BECKERRD Arterial COUNTY 2 55 0.40 E 1,780 17,700 2019 0.0437 1,858 743 7,082 5,649 2,260 71082 RANGE LINE RD BECKER RD 2 MI S OF GLADES CUT-OFF RD Arterial COUNTY 2 55 3.82 E 11780 17,700 2019 0.0437 1,858 7,094 67,590 5,649 21571 67,590 RANGE LINE RD 2 MI S OF GWDES CUT-OFF RD GWDES CUT-OFF RD Arterial COUNTY 2 55 1.93 E 1,780 17,700 2019 0.0437 1,858 3,593 34,235 5,649 10,926 34,235 ROSSER BLVD PAARDR APRICOT RD Collector CITY 2 40 2.17 D 3A25 17,700 2017 0.0183 3,594 7.833 38,371 5,790 12551 38,371 ROSSER BLVD APRICOTRD GATLINBLVD Collector CITY 4 40 0.79 D 1 3A25 1 39NO 1 20171 0.01831 3,594 2,841 31,293 5,790 4,552 31,293 Prepared by: NUE Urban Concepts Version 1.1: 9/7/213 Page 69 of 381 APPENDIX I: CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE TRAFFIC CHARACTERISTICS DATA Name From Street To Street Functional Classification Maintaining Entity Travel lanes Speed UmA Length LOS Standard AADTDaily CaPadtY Year Court, Growth Factors 2020 AADT 2020 VMT 2020 VMC 2045 AADT 2045 VMT 204S VMC SANDIA DR NW PRIMA VISTA BLVD SE LAKEHURST DR Collector CITY 2 35 0.68 D 3,000 14,800 2019 0.0183 3,049 2,079 10,073 4,895 3,332 10,073 SANDIA DR SE LAKEHURST DR CROSSTOWN PKWY Collector CITY 2 35 0.81 D 3,000 14,800 2019 0.0183 3,049 2,461 11,921 4,895 3,943 11,921 SANDIA DR CROSSTOWN PKWY SE THORNHILL DR Collector CITY 2 35 0.59 D 3,000 14,800 2019 0.0183 3,049 1,790 8,672 4,895 2,868 8,672 SAVAGE BLVD GATLIN BLVD GAUANO RD Collector CITY 2 35 2.13 D 3,922 17,700 2018 0.0183 4,051 8,659 37,700 6,515 13,876 37,700 SAVONA BLVD BECKER RD PAARDR Arterial CITY 2 40 0.91 E 9,80D 17,700 2019 0.0183 9,961 9,111 16,160 15,991 14,599 16,160 SAVONA BLVD PAARDR GATLIN BLVD Arterial CITY 2 40 2.81 E 9,800 17,700 2019 0.0183 9,961 28,085 49,813 15,991 45,003 49,813 SAVONA BLVD GATLIN BLVD CALIFORNIA BLVD Arterial CITY 2 40 1.08 E 14,500 17,700 2019 0.0183 14,738 15,934 19,101 23,660 25,533 19,101 SELVITZ RD BAYSHORE BLVD STJAM ES BLVD Arterial CITY 2 30 1.67 E 8,756 15,600 2017 0.0183 9,187 15,388 25,989 14,801 24,657 25,989 SELVITZ RD ST LAMES BLVD MIDWAYRD Arterial CITY 2 35 1.19 E 8,756 15,600 2017 0.0183 9,187 11,021 18,614 14,801 17,660 18,614 SHINN RD OKEECHOBEE RD RESERVE BLVD EXT Collector COUNTY 2 30 2.53 D 750 14,800 2017 0.0437 848 2,144 37,413 2,579 6521 37,413 SOUTHBEND BLVD SE OAKRI DGE DR ESNOW RD Arterial CITY 2 40 1.94 E 16,000 17,700 2019 0.0183 16,262 31,566 34,292 26,107 50,581 34,292 ST LAMES DR AIROSO BLVD STJAMES BLVD MajorArterial COUNTY 4 40 1.87 E 16,500 39,800 1 20201 0.0183 16,500 30,822 74,347 26,440 49,389 74,M7 STJAMES DR ST LAMES BLVD PEACHTREE BLVD Arterial COUNTY 4 45 0.27 E 19,000 39,800 2020 0.0183 19,000 5,167 10,823 30,445 8,279 10,823 ST LAMES DR PEACHTREE BLVD TELFORDAVE Arterial COUNTY 4 45 0.41 E 16,500 39,800 2020 0.0183 16,500 6,751 16,285 26,440 10,818 16,285 ST JAMES DR TELFORD AVE MIDWAYRD Arterial COUNTY 4 45 0.79 E 19,500 39,800 2020 0.0183 19,500 15A00 31,432 31,247 24,677 31A32 ST LUCIE WEST BLVD CO MM ERCE CENTER DR WOF I-95 Collector COUNTY 2 35 0.59 D 13,500 17,700 2019 0.0437 14,090 8,315 10,446 42,843 25,284 10,446 ST LUCIE WEST BLVD I-95 CALIFORNIA BLVD MajorArtenal CITY 4 40 0.85 E 36,000 39,800 2019 0.0183 36,590 31,104 33,769 58,742 49,841 33,769 ST LUCIE WEST BLVD CALIFORNIA BLVD COUNTRY CLUBDR Major ArtenaI CITY 4 40 0.30 E 36,000 39,800 2019 0.0183 36,590 10,883 11,816 58,742 17,439 11,816 STLUCIEWESTBLVD COUNTRYCWBDR CASHMERE BLVD MajorArterial CITY 4 40 1.04 E 36,000 39,800 2019 0,0183 36,590 38,258 41,537 58,742 61,305 41,537 ST LUCIE WEST BLVD CASHMERE BLVD BAYSHORE BLVD MajorArtenal CITY 6 40 0.47 E 46,000 59,900 1 20191 0.0183 46,754 22,095 28,255 75,059 35A05 28,255 THORNHILL DR SW BAYSHORE BLVD SE FLORESTA DR Collector CITY 2 40 2.04 D 9,600 17,700 2019 0.0183 9,757 19,900 36,032 15,664 31,888 36,032 TIFFANYAVE us HILLMOORDR Collector CITY 4 30 0.12 D 15,000 14,800 2019 0.013 15,195 1,797 1,750 21,259 2513 1,750 TIFFANVAVE HILLMOOR DR VILLAGE GREEN DR Collector CITY 4 30 0.20 D 15,000 14,800 2019 0.013 15,195 3,056 2,976 21,259 4,275 2,976 TIFFANYAVE VILLAGE GREEN DR LENNARD RD Collector CITY 4 30 0.70 D 4,666 14,800 2017 0.013 4,848 3,396 10,369 6,783 4,752 10,369 TIFFANYAVE LENNARD RD SE GRAND DR Collector CITY 2 30 0.92 D 4,666 14,800 2017 0.013 4,848 4,472 13,652 6,783 6,256 13,652 TRADITION PKWY COMM UNITY BLVD VILLAGE PKWY Major Artedal CITY 4 35 0.41 E 8,367 39,800 2018 0.0437 9,098 3,736 16,345 27,665 11,361 16,345 TRADITIONPKWY VILLAGE PKWY WOF I-95 Major Arterial CITY 6 45 0.40 E 36,500 59,900 2019 0.0183 38,095 14,870 23,965 59,558 23,828 23,965 TULIP BLVD PO RT ST LUCI E BLVD PAARDR Collector CITY 2 35 2.02 D 9,133 17,700 1 20181 0.0183 9,433 19,093 35,696 15,170 30594 35,696 TULIP BLVD PAARDR DARWIN BLVD Collector CITY 2 35 0.46 D 9,133 17,700 2018 0.0183 9,433 4,331 8,096 15,170 6,939 8,096 TULIP BLVD DARWIN BLVD PO RT ST LUCI E BLVD Collector CITY 2 35 0.89 D 8,200 17,700 2019 0.0183 8,334 7A52 15,796 13,380 11,941 15,796 UNIVERSITY BLVD NW PEACOCK BLVD NW CAU FORMA BLVD Collector CITY 2 30 0.58 D 4,800 14,800 2019 0.0183 4,879 2,834 8,580 7,832 4,540 8,580 us MARTINCL LENNARD RD Arterial STATE 6 45 0.14 E 41,917 59,900 2017 0.013 43,448 6,232 8,591 60,787 8,719 8,591 us LENNARD RD PORT ST LUCI E BLVD Arterial STATE 6 45 0.43 E 41,817 59,900 2017 0.013 43,448 18,522 25,535 60,787 25,914 25,535 us PORT ST LUCIE BLVD JENNINGS RD Arterial STATE 6 45 0.56 E 31,458 59,900 2017 0.013 32,685 18,371 33,668 45,729 25,703 33,668 us JENNINGS RD TIFFANY AVE Arterial STATE 6 45 0.68 E 31A58 59,900 2017 0.013 32,685 21128 40,553 4S,729 30,959 40,553 us TIFFANYAVE WALTON RD Arterial STATE 6 45 0.85 E 31,458 59,900 1 2017 0.013 32,685 27,662 50,695 45,729 38,701 50,695 us WALTON RD VILLAGE GREEN DR Arterial STATE 6 45 0.58 E 43,634 59,900 2017 0.013 45,336 26,071 34,447 63,429 36,476 34,447 VETERANS MEMORIALPKWY PORT ST LUCIE BLVD LYNGATE DR Arterial CITY 4 40 1.38 E 14,500 39,800 2019 0.013 14,689 20,215 1 54,774 20,551 28,282 54,774 VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY LYNGATE DR us Arterial CITY 4 40 0.90 E 14,911 39,800 2017 0.013 15A93 14,005 35,980 21,675 19,595 35,980 VI URGE GREEN DR us WALTON RD Collector CITY 4 30 1.05 D 9,600 14,800 2017 0.013 9,974 10,466 15,529 13,955 14,643 15,529 VI LLAGE GREEN DR WALTON RD TIFFANY AVE Collector CITY 2 30 0.63 D 4,633 14,800 2017 0.013 4,814 3,029 9,313 6,735 4,238 9,313 VILLAGE PKWY BECKER RD DISCOVERYWAY Major Artedal CITY 4 45 3.25 E 14,000 39,800 2019 0.0437 14,612 47A88 129,349 44,430 144,395 129,349 VI UAGE PKWY DI SCOVERY WAY TRADITI ON PKWY MajorArterial CITY 6 45 0.75 E 14,000 59,900 2019 0.0437 14,612 10,919 44,764 44,430 33,202 44,764 VI LLAGE PKWY TRADITION PKWY WESTCLIFFE LN MajorArtenal CITY 4 35 1.67 E 23,000 39,800 2019 0.0437 24,005 40,203 66,657 72,991 122,245 66,657 VI LLAGE PKWY WESTCUFFEW CROSSROADS PKWY Major Arterial CITY 4 35 0.48 E 12,101 39,800 2019 0.0437 12,524 6,047 19,215 38,082 18,386 19,215 WALTONRD USI VILLAGE GREEN DR Arterial COUNTY 4 30 0.45 E 1,160 33,800 2019 0.013 1,175 529 15,216 1,644 740 15,216 WALTONRD VILLAGE GREEN DR LENNARD RD Arterial COUNTY 4 35 0.76 E 16,700 39,800 2019 0.013 16,917 12,919 30,393 23,669 18,075 30,393 WALTONRD LENNARD RD GREEN RIVER PKWY Arterial COUNTY 2 45 1.10 E 9,200 17,700 2018 0.013 9,439 10,344 19,397 13,206 14,472 19,397 WALTONRD GREEN RIVER PKWY INDIAN RIVER DR Arterial COUNTY 2 45 0.79 E 6,500 17,700 2019 0.013 6,585 5,202 13,983 9,212 7,278 13,983 WESTCLIFFE LN TREMONTE AVE COMMUNITY BLVD Arterial HOA 4 35 0.40 E 6,267 39,800 2018 0.0437 6,815 2,707 15,808 1 20,721 8,230 1 15,808 WESTCLIFFE LN COMMUNITYBLVD VILLAGE PKWY Arterial HOA 4 35 0.56 E 6,267 39,800 2018 0,0437 6,815 3,850 22,483 20,721 11,706 22A83 WESTMORELAND BLVD us MORNINGSIDE BLVD Collector CITY 2 30 1.98 D 9,700 14,800 2019 0.013 9,826 19,422 29,253 13,748 27,173 29,253 WESTMORELAND BLVD MORNINGSIDE BLVD PORTST LUCIE BLVD Collector CITY 2 35 1.21 D 13,000 17,700 2019 0.013 13,169 15,908 21,382 18,425 22,257 21,382 SW BAVSHORE BLVD SE FLORESTADR Collector CITY 2 30 2.66 D 350 14,800 2019 0.0183 356 948 39,365 571 IS19 39,365 rTMR cdataprovided byCityofPartSt. Lucie. LOS Standards based on adopted Comprehensive Plan. DailyCapacity based on FDOTGeneral ized Tables (Appendix J). Growth Factorsbased on FDOTDistrict4 (Southeast) 2045 Treasure Coast Regional Planning btained forthefollowingthreeareas: (1)eastofSt. LucieRiver, (2)between Riverand Interstate 95;west ofInterstate95. 2020 AADT projected from base year oftraffic count multiplied bytheannual application ofthemodel growth factor. VMT is length x s length x Daily Capacity. 2045 AADT and VMT derived by applying growth rates. 2045 VMC held constant, to be updated during Phase 2 ofthe Mobility Plan. Prepared by: NUE Urban Concepts Version 1.1: 9/7/213 Page 70 of 381 City of Port St. Lucie response to St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study January 51", 2022 ATTACHMENT D Vehicle Miles of Travel by Maintaining Entity City Mobility Fee Technical Report Prepared by NUE Urban Concepts, LLC Page 71 of 381 Phase One Mobility Plan & Mobility Fee The 7.5 miles was measured from the Interchange of the Florida Turnpike and Port St. Lucie Blvd, roughly the center of travel for trips within the City. The analysis illustrates that the northern limits of the Mobility Fee Benefits District roughly correspond to this distance and that a portion of that travel occurs in Martin County, outside of the limits of both Port St. Lucie and St. Lucie County. This analysis was used to evaluate trip lengths by trip purpose based on Florida specific travel, captured in the 2017 National Household Travel Survey used to calculate mobility fees. The road impact fee interlocal agreement utilized an arbitrary 50%threshold to account for travel on City and County roads and ensure new development was not charged twice for the same impact. To quantify the real level of travel on City, County, and State roads, an evaluation was conducted based on the traffic characteristics data used in the areawide LOS analysis and the evaluation of existing conditions. Two metrics were evaluated: total lane miles and vehicle miles of travel (VMT). For purposes of this evaluation, Midway Road forms the northern boundary, Indian River Drive forms the eastern boundary, the Martin County Line form the southern boundary, and the Range Line Road Extension and Glades Cut -Off form the western boundary. The evaluation illustrates that 71% of the total lane miles are maintained by the City and 73% of the daily VMT occurs on City Roads (Table 15). LANE MILES 2020 DAILY VMT Maintaining Entity Total Percentage Total Percentage County 114.11 19% 336,747 13% 40: F 13% HOA E 12.38 2% 20,597 1% County (East of 1-95) 57.58 9.7% 223,671 10.0% Source: Lane miles and VMT are based on data from the Traffic Characteristics Data ( ). The Traffic Characteristics Data was obtained from the City, County and FDOT. The Lane Miles and VMT analysis was prepared by NUE Urban Concepts as of July 2021. Lane Miles is based on number of lanes x length of a road segment. VMT is based on AADT x length of a road segment. Total lane miles rounded to the nearest 10011 Place. Percentages rounded to the nearest 101h Place. State roads excludes Interstate 95 and the Florida Turnpike. © 2021 NUE Urban Concepts, LLC. All rights reserved. Page 76 Page 72 of 381 City of Port St. Lucie response to St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study January 51", 2022 ATTACHMENT E City Roads Incorrectly Identified as County Roads County Road Impact Fee Study Prepared by NUE Urban Concepts, LLC Page 73 of 381 DRAFT Table B-10 St. Lucie County Smart Moves 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan IN Feasible Jurisdiction lin From TO improvement Lengtn Added imies Design* Capacity Capacity Capacity ot Lapacity Added Added State & Federally Funded Roads TIP 2302566 Yes State King's Hwy 500' S of SR-70 N. of Picos Rd Widen 2L to 4L 1.39 2 2.78 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 30,719 2302567 Yes State King's Hwy N. of Picos Rd N. of 1-95 Overpass Widen 2L to 4L 1.50 2 3.00 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 33,150 4383791 Yes State King's Hwy SR-9/1-95 Overpass North of Commercial Cir Widen 2L to 4L 1.46 2 2.92 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 32,266 4383792 Yes State King's Hwy North of Commercial Cir St. Lucie Blvd Widen 2L to 4L 0.53 2 1.06 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 11,713 4383793 Yes State King's Hwy St Lucie Blvd S. of Indrio Rd Widen 2L to 4L 2.53 2 5.06 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 55,913 2314402 Yes County Midway Rd S. 25th ST/SR-615 SR-5/US-1 Widen 2L to 4L 1.50 2 3.00 C&G 13,320 29,160 15,840 23,760 2314403 Yes County Midway Rd Glades Cut Off Rd Selvitz Rd Widen 2L to 4L 1.59 2 3.18 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 31,625 4317525 Yes County Port St. Lucie Blvd South of Paar Dr South of Alcantarra Blvd Widen 2L to 4L 0.94 2 1.88 C&G 16,815 37,810 20,995 19,735 4317526 Yes County 113ort St. Lucie Blvd ISouth of Alcantarra Blvd South of Darwin Blvd Widen 2L to 4L 1.39 21 2.78 C&G 1 16,815 37,8101 20,995 29,183 Roadway Needs Plan 104 County Williams Rd Shinn Rd McCarty Rd New 2 Lanes 1.52 2 3.04 C&G 0 15,930 15,930 24,214 105 Yes County Airport Connector Johnston Rd Kings Hwy New 4 Lanes 1.42 4 5.68 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 50,864 106 Yes County Airport Connector 1-95 Johnston Rd New 4 Lanes 0.78 4 3.12 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 27,940 107 DEV Developer Northern Connector Florida's Turnpike 1-95 New 4 Lanes 0.94 4 3.76 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 33,671 108 DEV Developer Arterial A Glades Cut -Off Rd Midway Rd New 4 Lanes 2.34 4 9.36 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 83,819 109 DEV Developer Becker Rd Range Line Rd N-S Road B New 4 Lanes 2.03 4 8.12 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 72,715 110 DEV Developer Community Blvd Becker Rd Discovery Way New 4 Lanes 2.80 4 11.20 C&G 0 43,740 43,740 122,472 111 DEV Developer Crosstown Pkwy Range Line Rd Village Pkwy New 4 Lanes 2.72 4 10.88 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 97,430 112 DEV Developer Discovery Way Range Line Rd N-S Road B New 2 Lanes 1.99 2 3.98 C&G 0 15,930 15,930 31,701 113 DEV Developer E-W Road 2 Community Blvd Village Pkwy New 2 Lanes 0.56 2 1.12 C&G 0 15,930 15,930 8,921 114 DEV Developer E-W Road 6 Shinn Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd New 4 Lanes 2.30 4 9.20 C&G 0 43,740 43,740 100,602 115 County Jenkins Rd N. Jenkins Rd St. Lucie Blvd New 4 Lanes 2.26 4 9.04 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 80,953 116 Yes County Jenkins Rd Post Office Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd New 4 Lanes 0.37 4 1.48 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 13,253 117 PE only County Jenkins Rd Walmart Distr. Center Altman Rd New 4 Lanes 0.81 4 3.24 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 29,014 118 County McCarty Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd Williams Rd New 4 Lanes 1.98 4 7.92 C&G 0 44,100 44,100 87,318 119 DEV Developer Newell Rd Shinn Rd Arterial A New 4 Lanes 2.54 4 10.16 C&G 0 44,100 44,100 112,014 120 County North -Mid County Conn Orange Ave Florida'a Turnpike New 4 Lanes 1.88 4 7.52 C&G 0 37,810 37,810 71,083 121 DEV Developer Tradition Pkwy Range Line Rd SW Stony Creek Way New 4 Lanes 2.05 4 8.20 C&G 0 32,110 32,110 65,826 122 County North -Mid County Conn Okeechobee Rd Orange Ave New 4 Lanes 2.93 4 11.72 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 104,953 123 County North -Mid County Conn Midway Rd Okeechobee Rd New 4 Lanes 2.37 4 9.48 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 84,893 124 DEV Developer N-S Road A Becker Rd Crosstown Pkwy New 4 Lanes 5.13 4 20.52 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 183,757 125 DEV Developer N-S Road B Becker Rd Discovery Way New 4 Lanes 2.80 4 11.20 C&G 0 43,740 43,740 122,472 126 DEV Developer Open View Dr (West) N-S Road A Village Pkwy New 4 Lanes 2.97 4 11.88 C&G 0 43,740 43,740 129,908 127 DEV Developer Paar Dr (West) N-S Road A Village Pkwy New 4 Lanes 3.30 4 13.20 C&G 0 43,740 43,740 144,342 128 DEV Developer Range Line Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd Midway Rd New 4 Lanes 5.46 4 21.84 C&G 0 37,810 37,810 206,443 129 DEV Developer Shinn Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd Midway Rd New 4 Lanes 4.95 4 19.80 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 177,309 130 DEV Developer Westcliffe Ln N-S Road A SW Tremonte Ave New 4 Lanes 1.15 4 4.60 C&G 0 35,820 35,820 41,193 131 DEV Developer Williams Ext. McCarty Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd New 4 Lanes 1.65 4 6.60 C&G 0 44,100 44,100 72,765 132 County Bayshore Blvd St. Lucie West Blvd Selvitz Rd Widen 2L to 4L 1.46 2 2.92 C&G 13,320 29,160 15,840 23,126 133 County California Blvd Savona Blvd Del Rio Blvd Widen 2L to 4L 1.33 2 2.66 C&G 16,815 37,810 20,995 27,923 134 DEV Developer Discovery Way N-S Road B Village Pkwy Widen 2L to 4L 1.31 2 2.62 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 26,056 135 County East Torino Pkwy NW Cashmere Blvd Midway Rd Widen 2L to 4L 2.73 2 5.46 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 54,300 136 County Glades Cut -Off Rd Arterial A Selvitz Rd Widen 2L to 4L 5.39 2 10.78 C&G 15,045 33,830 18,785 101,251 Tindale Oliver December 2021 B-13 St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study Page 74 of 381 DRAFT Table B-10 (continued) St. Lucie County Smart Moves 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Cost Lanes Lane Section Initial Future Added Vehicle Miles . Feasible JurisdictionOn From. Improvement.Capacity Added Design* Capacity Capacity Capacity Idb - Added Added Roadway Needs Plan 137 PE only County Jenkins Rd Altman Rd Orange Ave Widen 2L to 4L 3.01 2 6.02 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 59,869 138 County Jenkins Rd Orange Ave N Jenkins Rd Widen 2L to 4L 0.52 2 1.04 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 10,343 139 PE only County Jenkins Rd Midway Rd Post Office Rd Widen 2L to 4L 0.34 2 0.68 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 6,763 140 PE only County Jenkins Rd Glades Cut -Off Rd Walmart Distr. Center Widen 2L to 4L 0.58 2 1.16 C&G 15,930 35,820 19,890 11,536 141 State Kings Hwy S of Indrio Rd US-1 Widen 2L to 4L 2.85 2 5.70 C&G 17,700 39,800 22,100 62,985 142 County McCarty Rd Williams Rd Midway Rd Widen 2L to 4L 1.27 2 2.54 C&G 13,320 29,160 15,840 20,117 144 County NW Cashmere Blvd Swan Lake Circle East Torino Pkwy Widen 2L to 4L 1.22 2 2.44 C&G 16,815 37,810 20,995 25,614 145 County Savona Blvd Gatlin Blvd California Blvd Widen 2L to 4L 1.08 2 2.16 C&G 13,320 29 1160 15,840 17,107 146 County Selvitz Rd Bayshore Dr Milner Dr Widen 2L to 4L 2.68 2 5.36 C&G 13,320 29,160 15,840 42,451 148 County Southbend Blvd Becker Rd Port St. Lucie Blvd Widen 2L to 4L 4.79 2 9.58 C&G 13,320 29,160 15,840 75,874 149 Yes County St. Lucie West Blvd E of 1-95 Cashmere Blvd Widen 4L to 6L 1.92 2 3.84 C&G 37,810 56,905 19,095 36,662 161 Yes County California Blvd Del Rio Blvd Crosstown Pkwy Widen 2L to 4L 0.37 2 0.74 C&G 16,815 37,810 20,995 7,768 162 DEV Developer Midway Rd Arterial A 1-95 Widen 2L to 4L 0.88 2 1.76 C&G 13,320 29,160 15,840 13,939 163 DEV Developer Becker Rd N-S Road B Village Pkwy New 6 Lanes 2.26 6 13.56 C&G 0 56,905 56,905 128,605 164 DEV Developer Paar Dr (West) Range Line Rd N-S Road A New 2 Lanes 0.94 2 1.88 C&G 0 15,930 15,930 14,974 165 DEV Developer Open View Dr (West) Range Line Rd N-S Road A New 2 Lanes 0.95 2 1.90 C&G 0 15,930 15,930 15,134 166 County Trade Center/Tom Macki Village Pkwy Discovery Way New 2 Lanes 0.36 2 0.72 C&G 01 15,930 15,930 5,735 167 1 DEV I Developer IVillage Pkwy Becker Rd I Discovery Way Widen 4L to 6L 1 3.261 21 6.521 C&G 1 30,7801 47,5001 16,720 54,507 Total (All Roads): 365.56 3,492,548 County/Developer Roads (Cost Feasible); 345.04 94% (a) 3,265,802 State Roads (Cost Feasible): 20.52 6% (b) 226,746 VMC Added per Lane Mile: 9,600 County Roads (Cost Feasible); 25.70 63% (c) - State Roads (Cost Feasible): 14.82 37% (d) New Road Construction: 265.92 70% (e) - Lane Addition: 99.64 30% (f) - *C&G = Curb & Gutter (Urban Design), OD = Open Drainage (Rural Design) Source: St. Lucie County Smart Moves 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan Tindale Oliver December 2021 B-14 St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study Page 75 of 381 City of Port St. Lucie response to St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study January 5t", 2022 ATTACHMENT F Proposed County Benefit Zones County Road Impact Fee Study Prepared by NUE Urban Concepts, LLC Page 76 of 381 DRAFT Map 2 St. Lucie County Benefit Zones — Proposed Tindale Oliver December 2021 31 St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study Page 77 of 381 City of Port St. Lucie response to St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study January 51", 2022 ATTACHMENT G Select Zone Analysis Map & Trip Matrix City Mobility Fee Analysis Prepared by NUE Urban Concepts, LLC Page 78 of 381 City of Port St. Lucie Mobility Plan & Fee Select Zone Analysis (2045 Model Data) NN lndri4 nge Ave o N E r�o z Q Q 1z g 42 November 8, 2021 0 1 2 3 4 Miles V20 Legend 3 Tra Benefit District 23 - Devin North US 1 West 4dition No rthwest Benefit District 24 - Devin Glades 25th Queens Cove 5 -O S I95 East 25 - Ft Pierce SE 6-Hutchinson Island Hu 26 - North Central PSL at Midway 7 Ft Pierce Downtown North 27 - Central PSL at St Lucie W ie 8 Ol Glades SLC 28 - SLC SE at Prima Vista 9d Southwest Benefit District 29 - SE PSL at PSL Blvd 10 South Central PSL 30 - SLC SR 68 N I95 E _ zrce 14 D North Limited Access Triangle 31 - Okeechobee to Edwards 15evin SLC Okeechobee S I95 W 32 - US 1 East @ Virginia S o _ 16 SLC Okeechobee N I95 W 33 - Midway E of US 1 % g W 17 - SLC SR 68 N I95 W W 34 - Midway W of US 1 ,2 18 SLC NE Airport 35 Midway E of Turnpike g W 19 - Ft Pierce NW 36 - Midway I95 to Turnpike a W 20 - Ft Pierce Okeechobee N I95 E 40 - Midway to Okeechobee NW 21 - Ft Pierce Downtown South 42 - Glades at Range Line SW 22 - Devin North US 1 East 45 - SLC W Ft Pierce S Airport �D ed o B 0 Jensen Beach North River kL' Shores Stuart SE Oc n 0-46 Palm City LAND USE • MOBILITY • PARKING • FEES ASSOCIATES Port Ss. Lucie Mobility Plan Base Year 20452one4o-Zone hips Page 80 of 381 City of Port St. Lucie response to St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study January 51", 2022 ATTACHMENT H Select Zone Analysis Travel Summary City Mobility Fee Analysis Prepared by NUE Urban Concepts, LLC Page 81 of 381 2045 MODEL DATA PORT ST. LUCIE (PSL) TOTAL OTHER COUNTIES %Total Non Zone District Total Internal % Internal Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 9 Zone 10 Zone 26 Zone 27 Zone 29 Port St. Lucie % Internal PSL Martin Indian River External Total Other Counties St. Lucie County 3 Tradition Benefit District 37,078 5,894 16% 5,894 315 7,105 11,043 306 3,048 513 28,223 76% 3,230 552 1,691 33,696 91% 4 Northwest Benefit District 20,552 2,636 13% 400 2,636 969 2,546 1,002 1,985 227 9,766 48% 620 647 1,099 12,132 59% 9 Southwest Benefit District 64,338 13,766 21% 7,052 1,008 13,766 15,809 632 4,714 890 43,872 68% 6,231 1,008 4,954 56,065 87% 10 South Central PSL 459,735 239,046 52% 10,965 2,463 15,843 239,046 5,438 35,646 23,145 332,547 72% 56,663 3,273 20,929 413,412 90% 26 North Central PSL @ Midway 36,758 5,224 14% 254 1,078 660 5,488 5,224 5,731 651 19,086 52% 1,254 643 1,169 22,152 60% 27 Central PSL @ St. Lucie West 119,114 35,527 30% 2,890 1,913 4,911 35,355 5,730 35,527 2,396 88,722 74% 4,897 1,235 3,803 98,658 83% 29 Southeast PSL @ Port St Lucie Blvd 66,566 14,277 21% 489 241 828 22,858 636 2,362 14,277 41,692 63% 10,845 634 2,968 56,139 84% Totals 804,141 316,371 39% 27,946 9,655 44,083 332,145 18,968 89,014 42,098 563,908 70% 83,740 7,993 36,613 692,254 86% Page 82 of 381 City of Port St. Lucie response to St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study January 51", 2022 ATTACHMENT I Select Zone Analysis Travel Summary Travel Midway Road and North City Mobility Fee Analysis Prepared by NUE Urban Concepts, LLC Page 83 of 381 2045 MODEL DATA PORT ST. LUCIE (PSL) TOTAL OTHER COUNTIES %Total Non St. Lucie County ST. LUCIE SOUTH OF MIDWAY ST. LUCIE COUNTY Zone District Total Internal % Internal Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 9 Zone 10 Zone 26 Zone 27 Zone 29 Port St. Lucie % Internal PSL Martin Indian River External Total Other Counties Zone 8 Zone 25 Zone 28 Total Total 2 % Non SLC & South of Midway SLC & FTP North of Midway 3 Tradition Benefit District 37,078 5,894 16% 5,894 315 7,105 21,043 306 3,048 513 28,223 76% 3,230 552 1,691 33,696 91% 409 124 223 756 34,451 93% 7% 4 Northwest Benefit District 20,552 2,636 13% 400 2,636 969 2,546 1,002 1,985 227 9,766 48% 620 647 1,099 12,232 59% 521 519 256 1,296 13,428 65% 35% 9 Southwest Benefit District 64,338 13,766 21% 7,052 1,008 13,766 15,809 632 4,714 890 43,872 68% 6,231 1,008 4,954 56,065 87% 502 400 506 1,407 57,472 89% 11% 10 South Central PSL 459,735 239,046 52% 10,965 2,463 15,843 239,046 5,438 35,646 23,145 332,547 72% 56,663 3,273 20,929 413,412 90% 1,818 4,317 20,974 17,109 430,521 94% 6% 26 North Central PSL @ Midway 36,758 5,224 14% 254 1,078 660 5,488 5,224 5,731 651 19,086 52% 1,254 643 1,169 22,252 60% 190 1,379 865 2,434 24,585 67% 33% 27 Central PSL @ St. Lucie West 119,114 35,527 30% 2,890 2,913 4,911 35,355 5,730 35,527 2,396 88,722 74% 4,897 2,235 3,803 98,658 83% 1,995 1,476 3,263 6,734 105,393 88% 12% 29 Southeast PSL @ Port St Lucie Blvd 66,566 14,277 21% 489 241 828 22,858 636 2,362 14,277 41,692 63% 10,845 634 2,968 56,139 84% 147 2,087 3,779 5,013 61,152 92% 8% Totals 804,141 316,371 39% 27,946 9,655 44,083 332,145 18,968 89,014 42,099 563,908 70% 83,740 7,993 36,613 692,254 86% 5,581 9,302 19,866 34,749 727,003 90% 10% Page 84 of 381 City of Port St. Lucie response to St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study January 51", 2022 ATTACHMENT J Select Zone Analysis Travel Summary East & West of Interstate 95 City Mobility Fee Analysis Prepared by NUE Urban Concepts, LLC Page 85 of 381 2045 MODEL DATA PORT ST. LUCIE (PSL) EAST & WEST OF INTERSTATE 95 Zone District Total Internal % Internal Zone 3 Zone 4 Zone 9 Zone 30 Zone 26 Zone 27 Zone 29 Port St. Lucie % Internal PSL West of Interstate 95 % West of Interstate 95 East of Interstate 95 % East of Interstate 95 3 Tradition Benefit District 37,078 5,894 16% 5,894 315 7,105 11,043 306 3,048 513 28,223 76% 13,314 47% 14,909 53% 4 Northwest Benefit District 20,552 2,636 13% 400 2,636 969 2,546 1,002 1,985 227 9,766 48% 4,005 41% 5,761 59% 9 Southwest Benefit District 64,338 13,766 21% 7,052 1,008 13,766 15,809 632 4,714 890 43,872 68% 21,826 50% 22,045 50% 10 South Central PSL 459,735 239,046 52% 10,965 2,463 15,843 239,046 5,438 35,646 23,145 332,547 72% 29,271 9% 303,275 91% 26 North Central PSL @ Midway 36,758 5,224 14% 254 1,078 660 5,488 5,224 5,731 651 19,086 52% 1,992 10% 17,094 90% 27 Central PSL @ St. Lucie West 119,114 35,527 30% 2,890 1,913 4,911 35,355 5,730 35,527 2,396 88,722 74% 9,715 11% 79,008 89% 29 Southeast PSL @ Port St Lucie Blvd 66,566 14,277 21% 489 241 828 22,858 636 2,362 14,277 41,692 63% 1,559 4% 40,134 96% Totals 804,141 316,371 39% 27,946 9,655 44,083 332,145 18,968 89,014 42,098 563,908 70% 81,683 14% 482,225 86% Page 86 of 381 City of Port St. Lucie response to St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study January 51", 2022 ATTACHMENT K Phase One Mobility Plan Cost City Mobility Fee Analysis Prepared by NUE Urban Concepts, LLC Page 87 of 381 APPENDIX K: CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE PHASE ONE MOBILITY PLAN CORRIDORS PERSON MILES NAME FROM STREET TO STREET MAINTENANCE LENGTH MOBILITY PLAN CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT MULTIMODALPROJECTOFSCRIPTION COST OF CAPAITY PRIORITY FUNDED CORRIDOR DESCRIPTION AREA (PMC) COLOR HIGHLIGHTS: GREY= FUNDED PROJECT; GREEN = DEVELOPER PROJECT; ORANGE = HIGH COST PROJECT. BLUE = COUNTY ROAD; CAUTION: NO ACTION, APPROVALS, OR VOTES HAVE OCCURRED. PROJECTS, COST, CAPACITY & PRIORITIES SUBJECT TO CHANGE. Upgrade to............ ............ AIROSOBLVD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD ST JAMES DR CITY 4.24 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WEST OF mukimedalquaIXV of servke, fill in $ 3,177,549 5,084 2026-2035 NO ALCANTARRABLVID SW PARSONS ST PORT ST LUCIE BLVD CITY 0.81 MULTIMODAL STREET COMPLETE RIVER �STOF network gaps Add facility BAYSHORE BLVD MOUNTWELLST PORTST LUCIE BLVD CITY 0.80 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF Add mukimedal facility $ 341,790 965 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER COMPLETE WESTOF oo Enhance quality fservice f..isting BAYSHORE BLVD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD PRIMA VISTA BLVD CITY 3.21 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities $ 1,844,186 ],69] 2026-2035 NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes with Complete BAYSHORE BLVD PRIMAVISTA BLVD SELVITZ RD CITY 1.37 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex with ROW $ 48,276,S36 71,318 HIGH$$$ NO Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance BAYSHORE BLVD SELVITZ RD STIAMES DR CITY 0.92 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE STREET WESTOF RIVER mukimodal quality of service, fill in $ 691,814 1,107 2026-2035 NO network gaps WESTOF Newt Lane Road, Potentia14 Lane Road, DEVELOPER BECKER RD EAT RANGE LINE RD VILLAGE PKWY TBD/HOA 4.29 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER with Complete StreeElements t $ 6,260,015 57,529 DRIVEN DEVELOPER COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance quality ofservice of existing BECKER RD VILLAGE PKWY VIATESORO CITY 6.06 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities $ 3,485, 896 14, 550 2036-2045 NO WIDEN E%ISTING WESTOF Widen from Zto4 Lanes with Complete BECKER RD VIATESORO GIISON RD CITY 2.00 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 23,360,000 104,000 HIGH$$$ NO BDACKWELL DR SE BERKSHIRE BLVD SE UNIVERSITYTERR CITY 0.21 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EAST OF Add mukimodal facility $ 89,752 253 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER COMPLETE EASTOF CALAIS ST SE IBIS AVE MARIPOSAAVE CITY 0.37 MULTIMOOAL STREET RIVER Add mukimodal facility $ 1S9,041 449 2036-2045 NO Upgrade to 8'shared-use pa..,enhance CALIFORNIA BLVD CAMEO BLVD SAVONA BLVD CITY 1.36 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF mukimodal quality of servke, fill in $ 870,220 1,392 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER network gaps WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widenfrom 2W4 Lanes with Complete CALIFORNIA BLVD SAVONA BLVD CROSSTOWN PKWY 1.70 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex with ROW 59,949,186 88,561 HIGH$$$ NO CALIFORNIA BLVD ST LUCIE WEST BLVD TORINO PKWY CITY 2.05 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF o Enhance quality fservice of existing $ 1,1]9, 895 4,925 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities COMPLETE WESTOF CAMEO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD CROSSTOWN PKArY CITY 1.74 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER Add mukimodal facility $ 737,631 2,083 2026-2035 NO COMPLETE WESTOF CAMEO BLVD CROSSTOWN PKWY SW ROCKY BAYOU TERR CITY 0.43 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER Add multmodxl facility $ 183,045 517 2026-2035 NO Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance CANE SLOUGH RD us LENNARDRD CITY 0.22 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EASTOF mukimodal quality of.e k., fill in $ 165,022 264 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER network aaw COMPLETE WESTOF Enhancequality fxerviceof existing$ CASHMERE BLVD DEL RIO BLVD ST LUCIE WEST BLVD CITY 2.11 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER multimadalfacilkies 1,212,939 5,063 2026-2035 NO COMPLETE WESTOF o Enhance quality fservice of existing CASHMERE BLVD ST LUCIE WEST BLVD SWAN E CIRCLE TAK CITY 0.51 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities $ 295,466 1, 233 2026-2035 NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2.4 lanes with Complete CASHMERE BLVD SWAN DARE CIRCLE TORINO PKWY CITY 1.S0 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 17,523,511 78,016 HIGH$$$ NO WESTOF Upgradeto 10'tra11, enhance mukimodal COMMERCE [ENTER DR CROSSTOWN PKWYCOMPLETE ST LUCIE WEST BLVD HOA 2.13 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER quality of service $ 2,133,141 7,6J9 2036-2045 NO COMPLETE WESTOF Upgrade to 10'tra11, enhance mukimodalS COMMERCE CENTER DR ST LUCIE WEST BLVD GLADES CUT-OFF RD CITY 3.13 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER quality of service $ 3,130,]04 ll,iJl 2036-2045 NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2.4 lanes with Complete DEVELOPER COMMUNITYBLVD TRADITION PKWY DISCOVERY WAY CITY 0.8] MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 1,286,822 11,826 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WESTOF New 2 Dane Road, Potential 4 lane Road, DEVELOPER COMMUNITYBLVD DISCOVERYWAY BECKER RD ENT HOA 2.89 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER with Coplete me Street Elents m $ 4,263,791 39184 DRIVEN DEVELOPER OUTSIDE OF New 2 Dane Road, Potential 4 lane Road, DEVELOPER CROSSTOWN PKWYEXT GLADES CUT OF F ROAD RANGE UNE RD TBD/HOA 0.S4 MOBILITY NEWROAD AREA with Complete Street Elements $ 804,858 7397 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WESTOF New4 Dane Road with Complete Street DEVELOPER CROSSTOWN PKWYEXT RANGE LINE RD VILLAGE PKWY TBD/HOA 2.69 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER Elements $ 3,969,S03 36,480 DRIVEN DEVELOPER COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance quality 0-vice of existing CROSSTOWN PKWY VILLAGE PKWY us CITY 8.22 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities $ 4,726,230 19,727 2036-2045 NO Upgradeto8'shared-usepath,enha nce DARWIN BLVD BECKER RD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD CITY 3.49 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE STREET WESTOF RIVER mukimocialqualkyofservke, Rllin $ 2,616,734 4,187 2026-2031 NO network gaps Upgrade to 8' shared -use path, enhance DEL RIO BLVD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD CALI FORN IA BLVD CITY 2.79 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF mukimod, l quality fservice, fill in $ 2,089,180 3,343 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER network gaps WESTOF New 2 Dane Road, Potential 4 lane Road, DEVELOPER DISCOVERYWY RANGE LINE RD SWRIVERIANDBLVD TBD/HOA 2.00 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER with Complete Street Elements $ 2,954,602 27,153 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WIDEN E%ISTING WEST OF Widen from 2[o 4 lanes with Complete DEVELOPER DISCOVERYWY SWRIVERIANDBLVD VILLAGE PKWY TBD/HOA 1.31 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 1,936,743 21,192 DRIVEN DEVELOPER DREYFUSS BLVD O. L. PEACOCK PARKTRAIL LOOP ROSSER BLVD CITY 0.60 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WEST OF Add mukimodal facility $ 25S, 000 720 2036-2045 NO F LO FIESTA DR OAKLYN ST PRIMAVISTABLVID �MWOI)Al_ STREET COMPLETE RIVER WEITOI Upgrade 1. 1 Lane Divided with Enhanced $ 2S,W0,000 43,160 FUNDED CITY / OTHER STREET COMPLETE RIVER WESTOF M.Itinnocial Elements Upgrade to 2 lane Divided with Enhanced FLORESTA DR PRIMA VISTA BLVD AIROSO BLVD CITY 0.86 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER Mukimocial Elements $ 5,354,748 10,281 2026-2035 NO COMPLETE WESTOF Upgrade to 2 lane Divided with Enhanced FLORESTA DR AIROSO BLVD BAYSHORE BLVD CITY 2.37 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER Mukimodal Elements $ 8,573,778 16,462 2026-2035 NO GATUN BLVD WOFI-95 PORT ST LUCIE BLVD CITY 3.35 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF Enhancequalkyofserviceof existing$ 1,810,730 7,558 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities GILSON RD MARTIN C.L. BECKER RD COUNTY 0.28 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF Add mukimodal facility $ 120,118 339 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER WIDEN T021ANE OUTSIDE OF Widen irom DividedwRh GLADES CUT-OFF RD TRADITION PKWY EXT RANGE LINE RD COUNTY 2.00 MOBILITY DIVIDED AREA Pata.. and Mukimotlal Lanes Shared -Use Pand $ 9,600,000 14,200 2036-2045 NO WIDENTOZIANE WESTOF Widenfrom ZW2 Law Divided with GLADES CUT-OFF RD RANGE LINE RD C24CANAL COUNTY 2.45 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Pa.. and Mukimodal Lanes $ 11,760,000 17,395 2026-2035 NO WIDEN T021ANE WESTOF La Warred GLADES CUT-OFF RD C24 CANAL COMMERCE CENTER DR COUNTY 2.17 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER -en se Pat and Shared -Use Pa.. and Mukimatlal Lanes ultimdalU $ 10,416,000 15,407 2026-2035 NO GLADES CUT-OFF RD COMMERCE CENTER OR MIDWAVRD COUNTY 3.15 MOBILITY WIDEN T021ANE WESTOF Widen irom $ 15,120,000 22,365 2026-2035 NO DIVIDED RIVER Pat and ultimdalLh Shared -Use Pa.. and Mukimodal Lanes By: NUE Urban Concepts Version 1.3: 12/16/21 Page 88 of 381 APPENDIX K: CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE PHASE ONE MOBILITY PLAN CORRIDORS PERSON MILES NAME FROM STREET TO STREET MAINTENANCE LENGTH MOBILITY PLAN CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT MULTIMODALPROIECFDESCRIPTION COST OFCAPAOTY PRIORITY FUNDED CORRIDOR DESCRIPTION AREA (PMC) WIDEN EXISTING OUTSIDE OF Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes with Trail: GLADES CUT-OFF RD MIDWAYRD SELVITZ RD COUNTY 2.27 MOBIUTY ROAD AREA Complex $ 39,93S,920 98,932 HIGH$$$ NO GRANDDR SW WALTON RD SE LENARD RD CITY 1.54 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EASTOF Add mukimodA facility $ 654,088 1,847 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER EASTOF Enhancequality ofservkc of existingL. GREEN RIVER PKWV MARTIN C.L.OMPLETE WALTON RD CITY 2.65 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER muhimodalfacilities $ 1,523,274 6,358 2026-2035 NO COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance quality of service of existing$ HEATHERWOOD BLVD SW CALIFORNIA BLVD SW CASHMERE BLVD CITY 1.09 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER muhimodalfacilities 627,498 2,619 2036-2045 NO Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance HILLMOOR DR us IENNARD RD CITY 2.00 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EASTOF muhimodal quality ofservice, fill in $ 748,835 2,198 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER network gaps Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance JENNINGS RD us LENNARDRD CITY 0.48 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EASTOF muitlmodal quality of service, fill in $ 360,726 577 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER metworkgaps CITY 1.39 COMPLETE WEST OF Add facility $ 2036-2045 KESTOR DRIVE DARWIN BLVD BFCKER RD MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodal 592,155 1,672 NO COMPLETE WESTOF LAKEHURSTDR SW BAYSHORE RD SANDAAVE CITY 1.57 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER Add mukimadal facility $ 667,975 1,886 2036-2045 NO COMPLETE EASTOF Enhance quality ofservice of existing IENNARDRD USI WALTON RD CITY 2.30 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities $ 1,321,123 5,514 2036-2045 NO Upgradeto8'shared-use path, enhance LENNARDRD WALTON RD S OF SAVANNACLUB BLVD CITY 0.79 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EASTOF mukimodal quality of service, fill in $ 593,009 949 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER network gaps Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance LVNGATE DR VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY us CITY 0.62 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EASTOF mukimodal quality of service, fill in $ 462,086 739 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER network gaps WESTOF Newt Lane Road, Potentia14 Lane Road, $ DEVELOPER MARSHALL PKWY RANGE LINE RD IA5 TBD/HOA 4.62 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER with Complete Street Elements 6,831,655 62,783 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WESTOF New 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, DEVELOPER MCCARTYRD GLADES CUT OF F ROAD OKEECHOBEE RD TBD/HOA 3.19 MOBIUTY NEWROAD RIVER with Trail $ 3,799,672 33974 DRIVEN DEVELOPER Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance MELALEUCABLVD LENNARDRD GREEN RIVER PXNY CITY 1.74 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EAST OF muitimodal quality of service, fill in $ 1,305,000 2,088 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER network gaps WIDENT02LANE WESTOF Widenfrom 2 to 2 Lane Divided with MIDWAYRD OKEECHOBEE RD MCCARTYRD COUNTY 2.40 MOBIUTY DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Path and Muhimodal Lanes $ 21,520,000 17,040 2036-2045 NO WIDEN TO 2 LANE WESTOF Widen from 2 to 2 Lane Divided with MIDWAYRD MCCARTY RD N/SARTERIALA COUNTY 1.00 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Path and Mukimedal Lanes $ 4,800,000 7,100 2036-2045 NO WIDENTOZUINE WESTOF Widen irom2to2Une Dividedwkh MIDWAYRD N/SARTERIALA IA5 COUNTY 1.30 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Path and Mukimodal Lanes $ 6,240,000 9,230 2026-2035 NO MIDWAYRD I-9S EASTTORINOPKIVY COUNTY 1.28 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF Add murdmodal facility $ 543,S69 1,535 2036-204S NO 11 STREET RIVER WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2 to 4 La nes with Complete MIDWAYRD EAST TORI NO PRIVY SELVITZ RD COUNTY 1.32 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex $ 23,159,S85 68,426 HIGH $$$ NO COMPLETE OUTSIDE OF Enhance quality of service of existing MIDWAYRD SELVITZ RD US1 COUNTY 2.53 MULTIMODAL STREET AREA mukimodalfacilities $ 1,45], 465 6, 083 2036-2045 NO Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance MORNINGSIDE BLVD WESTMORELANDBLVD LYNGATE DR CITY 2.19 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE EASTOF mukimodal quality of service, fill in $ 1,640,228 5,249 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER network gaps WESTOF Road, New2LaneRStreet DEVELOPER N/SARTERIALA GLADES CUT-OFF ROAD MIDWAYRD TBD/HOA 2.42 MOBIUTY NEWROAD RIVER Elemensane with Complete Street Elements $ 3,576,616 32,169 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WESTOF New 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, DEVELOPER N/SROADA BECKER RD EXT CROSSTOWN PKWY EXT TBD/HOA 5.29 MOBIUTY NEWROAD RIVER with Complete Street Elements $ 7,812,281 72,794 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WESTOF N ew 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, DEVELOPER N/SROADA CROSSTOWN PKWY EXT GLADES CUT-OFF RD TBD/HOA 1.45 MOBIUTY NEWROAD RIVER with Complete Street Elements $ 2,146,909 19,730 DRIVEN DEVELOPER LINE 3.35 WESTOF N ew 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, $ 3,991,213 35,686 DEVELOPER NEWELLRD RANGE RDEXT N/SARTERIALA TBD/HOA MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER with To.II DRIVEN DEVELOPER COMPLETE WESTOF NWVOLUCIADRIVE EAST TORINO PKWY NWWESTBIANTONBLVD CITY 1.00 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER Add mukimodal facility $ 427,015 1,206 2036-2045 NO NW WEST BLANTON EASTTORINOPXWY WESTTORINO PKWY CITY 1.07 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF Add facility $ 4S6,764 1,290 2036-2045 NO BLVD STREET I RIVER mukimodal COMPLETE WESTOF OAKRIDGE DR SE OAKLYN ST SW MOUNTWELL ST CITY 0.81 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER Add mukimod,l facility $ 342,7W 968 2036-2045 NO WESTOF Road, New2LaneRStreet DEVELOPER _9111- PAAR DR EXT RANGE LINE RD VILLAGE PKWY TBD/HOA 4.22 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER Elements with Complete S[ree[Elements $ 6,239,697 57,343 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WESTOF PAAR DR EXT VILLAGE PKWY ROSSER BLVD TBD 0.85 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY RIVER Add mukimadal facility $ 360,891 1,019 2036-2045 NO Upgradeto8'shared-use path, enhance PARR DR ROSSER BLVD TULIPBLVD CITY 4.86 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF mukimodal quality of service, fill in $ 3,646,070 5,834 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER network gaps Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance PEACHTREE BLVD SEMMES DR NW SELVITZ RD CITY 0.51 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF mukimodal quality of service, fill in $ 394,926 616 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER network gaps WESTOF Enhancequalkyofserviceof existingE PEACOCKBLVD ST LUCIE WEST BLVD UNIVERSITY BLVD CITY 0.70 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER muk1E od.IfacIIrdes $ 402,595 1,680 2026-2035 NO PEACOCKBLVD UNIVERSITYBLVD CASHMEREBLVD CITY 2.27 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance quality of service of existing $ 1,305,598 5,449 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from Zto4 lanes with Complete $ 4,106,3]4 PORT ST LUCIE BLVD MARTIN C. L. BF[KER RD CITY 0.23 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex 12, 132 2026-2035 NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2.4 lanes with Complete PORT ST LUCI�RLVD BE[KER RD PAARD CITY 1.19 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex $ 20,000,000 61,623 HIGH$$$ NO By: NUE Urban Concepts Version 1. 3: 12/16/21 Page 89 of 381 APPENDIX K: CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE PHASE ONE MOBILITY PLAN CORRIDORS PERSON MILES NAME FROM STREET TO STREET MAINTENANCE LENGTH MOB I UTY PLAN CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT MULTIMODALPROJECI'DESCRIPTION COST OFCAPAOTY PRIORITY FUNDED CORRIDOR DESCRIPTION COMPLETE AREA WEITOF (PMC) PORTST LUCIE BLVD DARWIN BLVD GATLIN BLVD CITY j MU,,:A L STREET 6. RIVER Upgradeto8'shared-use path, enhance L PORT ST LU CIE BLVD GATLIN BLVD ST LUCIE RIVER STATE 3.78 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WLSTOF m,kimod,l quality of service, fill in $ 2,836,111 4,538 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER network gaps Upgradeto8'shared-usepath,enhance PORTSTLUCIEBLVD STLUOERIVER USI STATE 2.08 MULTIMOOAL COMPLETE EASTOF mukimodalq-IXV ofservke,Rllin $ 1,559,70 2,496 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER network gaps Upgradeto8'shared-usepath,enhame PRIMAVISTABLVD BAYSHORE BLVD AIROSO BLVD CITY 1.35 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE STREET WEST OF RIVER mukimodal quality of servke, fill in $ 1,013,012 1,621 2026-2035 NO network gaps Upgrade W 8'shared-use path, enhance PRIMAVISTABLVD AIROSOBLVD us COUNTY 1.96 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE STREET WEST OF RIVER muklmodal qualty of service, fill In $ 1,472,988 2,355 2026-2035 NO network gaps WIDEN T02LANE WESTOF Widenirom2W2Lane Divided with RANGE LINE RD MARTIN COUNTY PARR DR EXT COUNTY 0.98 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Path and Mukimodal lanes $ q,]04,000 6,958 2036-2045 NO WIDENT02LANE WESTOF Widen from 2 W 2 Lane Divided with RANGE LINE RD PAAR DR EXT DISCOVERYWAY COUNTY 1.00 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Path and Multimodal lanes $ 4,800,000 7,100 2036-2045 NO WIDENT021ANE WEST OF Widen from 2 W 2 Lane Divided with RANGE LINE RD DISCOVERYWAY MARSHAL PKWY COUNTY 1.30 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Path and Mukimodal Lanes $ 6,240,000 9,230 2036-2045 NO RANGE LINE RD MARSHALL PKWY TRADITION PKWY EXT COUNTY 1.40 MOBIUTY WIDENT02UNE WESTOF Widen from 2 W 2 Lane Divided with $ 6,720,000 9,940 2036-2045 NO DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Path and Mukimodal lanes WIDENT02LANE WESTOF Widen from 2 W 2 Lane Divided with RANGEUNERD TRADITION PRWY EXT GLADES CUT-OFF RD COUNTY 1.42 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Shared -Use Path and Multimadal lanes $ 6,816,000 10,082 2036-2045 NO OUTSIDE OF New 2 lane Road, Potential 4 lane Road, DEVELO PER RANGE LINE RD EXT GLADES CUT-OFF ROAD OKEECHOBEE RD TBD/HOA 5.65 MOBILITY NEWROAD AREA wRh Trail $ 6,]2],935 60,156 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WESTOF New 2 lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, DEVELOPER RESERVE BLVD EXT SHINN RD GLADES CUT-OFF RD TBD/HOA 2.20 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER with Trail $ 3,252,774 23421 DRIVEN DEVELOPER WEST OF New 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, DEVELOPER RIVERLANDBLVD BECKER RD EXT DISCOVERYWAY TBD/HOA 2.88 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER with Complete Street Elements $ 4,248,533 39044 DRIVEN DEVELOPER Upgradeto8'shared-use path, enhance ROSSER BLVD PARR DR GATLIN BLVD CITY 2.95 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF multimadal quality ofservice, fill in $ 2,215,589 3,545 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER network gaps Upgradeto8',hared-usepath,enha me SANDIADR NW PRIMA VISTA BLVD SETHORNHILLDR CITY 2.07 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF mukimodalquality ofservke, fill in $ 1,554,049 2,486 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER network gaps Upgradeto8'shared-usepath,enhance SAVONA BLVD BECKER RD GATLIN BLVD CITY 3.73 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE STREET WESTOF RIVER mukimodal quality ofservks, fill in $ 2,795,457 4,473 2026-2035 NO network gaps SAVONA BLVD GATUN BLVD CALIFORNIA BLVD CITY 1.08 MOBIUTY WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widenfrom 21*4 Lanes with Complete $ 37,986,419 56,116 HIGH $$$ NO ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex with ROW SELVITZ RD FLORESTA DR BAYSHORE BLVD CITY 0.48 MULTIMOOAL COMPLETE WESTOF Add muBimocial facility $ 205,525 580 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER WIDEN E%ISTING WESTOF Widen from 21B4 Lanes with Complete SELVITZ RD BAYSHORE BLVD MIDWAYRD CITY 2.86 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex $ 50,321,048 148,676 HIGH$$$ NO OUTSIDE OF New 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, DEVELOPER SHINN RD OKEECHOBEE RD RESERVE BLVD EXT TBD/HOA 2.53 MOBIUTY NEWROAD AREA with Trail $ 3,008,278 26,897 DRIVEN DEVELOPER SHINN RDEXT RESERVE BLVD EXT GLADES CUT-OFF ROAD TBD/HOA 2.22 MOBILITY NEWROAD OUTSIDE OF New 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, $ 2,638,710 23,593 DEVELOPER DEVELOPER AREA with Trail DRIVEN WIDEN EX ISTING WESTOF Widenfrom 2 W 4 Lanes with Complete SOUTHSEND BLVD SE OAKRIDGE DR BECKER RD CITY 4.18 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 48,813,859 217,323 HIGH$$$ NO Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance STIAMESBLVD SELVITZRD STIAMESDR HOA O.SS MULTIMODAL COMPLETE STREET WESTOF RIVER muk1r Odalq-IXy ofseMci,, fill in $ 415,481 665 2036-2045 NO network gap ST JAMES DR/25TH STREET AIROSOBLVD ST JAMES BLVD COUNTY 1.87 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance quality of service of existing $ 1,074,110 4,483 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities ST JAMES DR /25TH STREET STIAMES BLVD MIDWAY RD COUNTY 1.4] MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance qualityof service of existing $ 845,739 3,530 2036-2095 NO STUJCIEWESTBLVD COMMERCE CENTER DR AlffiRmVIOD UNTYAMM STREET W DEN EXISTING RIVER WESTOF mukimodal facilities Widen from 2.4 Lane, with Complete �k 17, oo�L 30,698 FUNDED L ROAD WIDEN E%ISTING RIVER WEST OF Street Elements Potential Widening from 4to61anes with ST LUCIE WEST BLVD 1-95 CASHMERE BLVD CITY 2.19 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Complete Street Elements $ 20,313,817 106,166 HIGH$$$ NO COMPLETE WESTOF o Enhance quality fs.,Vi,e of existing ST LUCIE WEST BLVD CASHMERE BLVD BAYSHORE BLVD CITY 0.47 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfaci0ties $ 2]1, 225 1, 132 2026-2035 NO TORINO PKWY(NORTH &WEST) EASTTORINOPKW'/ CALIFORNIA BLVD CITY 2.61 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WEST OF Add mukimOdal facility $ 1,109,744 3,133 2026-2035 NO TOR I N 0 PKINY (EMT) CALI F ORN IA BLVD CASHMERE BLV. 'I CITY I 1.00 MULTIMOCAL STREET RIVER nnidtirnoci.1 q..Ifty fs-ke, fillin $ 750,648 1,201 STREET WIDEN E%ISTING RIVER WESTOF network gaps Widenfrom 2W4 Lanes with Complete TORINO PKWY (EAST) CASHMERE BLVD MIDWAY RD CITY 2.49 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 42,950,447 126,8% HIGH$$$ NO Upgrade to8'shared-use path, enhance THORNHILL DR SW BAYSHORE BLVD SE FLORESTA DR CITY 2.04 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WEST OF mukimadal quality of s-ki,, fill in $ 1,526,780 2,443 2036-2045 NO STREET RIVER network gaps COMPLETE EASTOF Enhance quality of service of existing TIFFANY AVE USS LENNARD RD CITY 1.02 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilities $ 586, 445 2, 446 2036-2045 NO COMPLETE EAST OF TIFFANVAVE LENNARDRD SE GRAND DR CITY 0.92 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER Add muRimodal facility $ 392,024 1,107 2036-2045 NO OUTSIDE OF New 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, DEVELOPER TRADITION PKWYEXT GLADESCUTOFF ROAD RANGE LINE RD TBD/HOA 1.69 MOBILITY NEWROAD AREA with Complete Street Elements $ 2,500,182 22977 DRIVEN DEVELOPER By: N U E Urb an Concepts Version 1. 3: 12/16/21 Page 90 of 381 APPENDIX K: CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE PHASE ONE MOBILITY PLAN CORRIDORS PERSON MILES NAME FROM STREET TO STREET MAINTENANCE LENGTH MOBILITY PLAN CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT MULTIMODALPROIECIDESCRIPTION COST OFCAPAOTY PRIORITY FUNDED CORRIDOR DESCRIPTION AREA (PMC) WESTOF Ncw41-s-Road wfh Complete Street DEVELOPER TRADITION PKWY E%T RANGE LINE RD STONYCREEKWY TBD/HOA 1.99 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER Elements $ 2,940,623 27024 DRIVEN DEVELOPER COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance quality of service of existing TRADITION PKWY STONVCREEK WY WOF I-95 CITY 1.89 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodialfacilNes $ 1,084,444 4,526 2036-2045 NO Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance TULIPBLVD GATLIN BLVD PORTST LUCIE BLVD CITY 3.37 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE WESTOF mukimodal quality of,er,k,, fill in $ 2,524,935 4,040 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER netwmkgaps COMPLETE WESTOF Enhancequalityofserviceof existingSTREET UNIVERSITY BLVD US L NW PEACOO(BLVD MARTIN C.L. NW CALIFORNIA BLVD VILLAGE GREEN DR [ITV SlEr J.S. 123 MULTIMODAL MU-1-0-L COMPLETEIMP RIVER mukimodalfacilities 1"Ivn,,q"aIityfssrvi..f existing $ 333,333 �'W� 1,391 2036-2045 'FUNDED NO UsL VILLAGE GREEN DR MIDWAYRD STATE 4.99 MULTIMODAL COMPLETE IMIDEOF COMPLETE EASTOF Enhance quality of service of existing Enhance quality of service of existing $ -OMM FUNDED VETERANS MEMORIAL PKWY LYNGATE DR us CITY 0.90 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER muk1E-d.Ifacilities $ 519,808 2,1]0 2036-2095 NO VILLAGE GREEN DR US1 WALTON RD CITY 1.05 COMPLETE MULTIMODAL EASTOF Enhance quality of service of existing $ 603,328 2,518 2026-2035 NO STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilkies COMPLETE EASTOF Enhance quality ofservice of existing VILLAGE GREEN DR WALTON RD TIFFANYAVE CITY 0.63 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER multimodalfacifid- $ 361,831 1,510 2026-2035 CITY/OTHER WIDENE%ISTING WESTOF Potential Widening from 4 to 6 Lanes with DEVELOPER VIUAGE PKWY BECKER RD DISCOVERY WAY CITY 3.25 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Complete Street Elements 4,563,632 ]8,812 DRIVEN DRIVEN DEVELOPER COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance quality of service of existing VILLAGE PKWY DISCOVERY WAY TRADITION PKWY CITY 0.75 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfadiffl.s $ 429,]00 1,]94 2036-2045 NO COMPLETE WESTOF Enhance quality of service of existing VILLAGE PKWY TRADITION PKWY CROSSROADS PKWY CITY 2.16 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfacilkies $ 1,240, 613 5, 178 2036-2045 NO VILLAGE CROSSROADS PKWY SHINN RD 1.88 WESTOF Newt Lane Road, Poterfia14 Lane Road, $ 2,776,325 DEVELOPER PKWY EXT TBD/HOA MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER with Complete Street Elements 25,514 DRIVEN DEVELOPER US1 LENNARDRD COMPLETE EASTOF Enhance quality of service of existing $ 697,947 2,913 NO WALTON RD COUNTY 1.21 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfa.ilid.s 2026-2035 WIDEN TO 2 LANE EASTOF Upgrade to 2 Lane Dividedwith Enhanced WALTON RD LENNARDRD GREEN RIVER PKWY COUNTY 1.10 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Mukimodal Elements $ 6,849,119 13,150 2036-2045 NO WIDEN TO 2 LANE EASTOF Upgrade to 2 Lane Divided with Enhanced WALTON RD GREEN RIVER PKWY INDIAN RIVER DR COUNTY 0.79 MOBILITY DIVIDED RIVER Mukimodal Elements $ 4,93],651 9,480 2036-2095 NO Upgrade to 8'shared-use path, enhance WESTMORELANDBLVD us MORNINGSIDEBLVD CITY 1.98 COMPLETE MULTIMODAL EASTOF mukimodal quality of service, fill in $ 1,482,410 2,372 2036-204S NO STREET RIVER network gaps COMPLETE EASTOF Enhance quality of service of existing WESTMOREIAND BLVD MORNINGSIDE BLVD PORT ST LUCIE BLVD CITY 1.21 MULTIMODAL STREET RIVER mukimodalfadliies $ 694, 607 2, 899 2036-2095 NO WESTOF New 2 Lane Road, Potential 4 Lane Road, DEVELOPER WILLIAMS RD RANGE LINE RD EXT MIDWAY BYPASS GREENWAY TBD/HOA 3.89 MOBILITY NEWROAD RIVER wide Trai $ 4,623,190 41,337 DRIVEN DEVELOPER 95(PEACOCIQ GREENWAY CROSSTOWN PKWY GATLIN BLVD TBD 2.DS MULTIMODAL GREENWAY WESTOF New 12'-14'shared-use green-, $ 2,S62,500 9,840 PARKS MP NO RIVER WESTOF C 24 CANAL GREENWAY RANGE LINE RDEXT SOUTHBENDBLVD TBD 10.93 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY RIVER EAST OF New 12'-14'shared-use greenway $ 13,667,583 52,484 PARKS MP NO EAST COAST GREENWAY GREEN RIVER CONNECTOR CITY LIM IT us WALTON RD GREEN RIVER PKWY TED TBD 1,05 1.80 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY MULTIMODAL GREENWAY RIVER EASTOF New 12'- 14',ha,,d-,,, g-mvay New 12'-14'sharel-use greerwsay $ 1,314,825 $ 2,255,737 5,049 8,662 FUNDE� PARKS MP FOOT NO RIVER HOGSLOUGH us VILLAGE GREEN DR TBD 0.68 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY EASTOF New 12'-14'boardwalk $ 1,707,908 4,099 PARKS MP NO RIVER MIDWAY BYPASS GREENWAY GLADES CUT-OFF RD us TBD 5.81 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY WESTOF New 12'-14'shared-use greenway $ 7,261,030 27,882 PARKS MP NO RIVER O. L. PEACOCK PARKTRAIL LOOP PEACOCKGREENWAY PEACOCKGREENWAY TBD 2.55 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY WESTOF New 12'-14'shared-use greenway $ 3,187,500 12,240 PARKS MP NO RIVER PEACOCKGREENWAY GATLIN BLVD O. L. PEACOCK PARKTRAIL LOOP TBD 1.12 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY WESTOF New 12'-14'shared-use greenway $ 1,400,000 5,376 PARKS MP NO RIVER TORINO GREENWAY NETORINOPKWY NWPEACOCKBLVD TBD 0.37 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY WESTOF New 12'-14'shared-use greenway $ 457,169 1,756 PARKS MP NO RIVER US I CONNECTOR SE MORNINGSIDE BVLD us TBD 0.24 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY EASTOF New 12'-14'shared-use greenway $ 298,374 1,146 PARKS MP NO RIVER WILDERNESSTRAIL WESTMORELANDBLVD MORNINGSIDEBLVD TBD 1.72 MULTIMODAL GREENWAY EASTOF New 12'-14'shared-use greenway $ 2,150,000 8,256 PARKS MP NO RIVER Toll Cost 288.57 Total Cost$867,272,192. Total Person Miles of CapafM FMC): 2,937,093. $ 867,272,192 1 2,937,093 Developer driven improvemem costare 35% of the calculated wst The person miles ofcapacity Devebper Driven Improvements 6].2fi r&kcts 35%additional capacity above that miii,ed by the development $ g3,154,361 882,612 Atotal of I6%(45.76) of the mobility plan miles (288.57) of improvements represents 67% Total of Nigh Cost Major Road Improvements tobe Reviewed Further 45.76 ($647,292,446)oftheoverall cost($9]1,78],302)andissubjedtochange,asareall $ 538,175,445 1,385,252 improvements in the draft Phase One Mobility Nan. County roads comprise a total of 13.6%(36.65) of the Phase One Mobility Plan net miles (269.08). County road imprmementys represents 23.3%($179,829,2101 of the overall net cost County Roads(Two segments are also included under high cost major road improvements) 36.65 ($769,873, 987). County roads comprise a total of 13.05%(357,275) of the overall net mu10mada1 $ 1]9,829,210 35],275 capac'y(2,675,578). By: NUE Urban Concepts Version 1.3: 12/16/21 Page 91 of 381 City of Port St. Lucie response to St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study January 51", 2022 ATTACHMENT L High -Cost Corridors - Phase One Mobility Plan Cost City Mobility Fee Analysis Prepared by NUE Urban Concepts, LLC Page 92 of 381 EXCERPT OF CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE PHASE ONE MOBILITY PLAN HIGH COST CORRIDORS PERSON MILESMULTIMODALPROIECTDESCRIPTION NAME FROM STREET TO STREET MAINTENANCE LENGTH MOBILITY PLAN CORRIDOR ASSESSMENT COST OF CAPACITY PRIORITY FUNDED CORRIDOR DESCRIPTION AREA (PMC) ORANGE = HIGH COST CITY ROAD PROJECTS. BLUE = HIGH COST COUNTY ROAD PROJECTS. 1P WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2 to 4Laneswith Complete BAYSHORE BLVD PRIMAVISTABLVD SELVITZRD CITY 1.31 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex with ROW $ 48,276,536 71,318 HIGH $$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes with Complete BECKER RD VIATESORO GILSON RD CITY 2.00 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 23,360,000 104,000 HIGH $$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes with Complete CALIFORNIA BLVD SAVONA BLVD CROSSTOWN PKWY CITY 1.70 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex with ROW $ 59,949,386 88,561 HIGH$$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes with Complete CASHMERE BLVD SWAN LAKE CIRCLE TORINO PKWY CITY 1.50 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 17,523,511 78,016 HIGH$$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING OUTSIDE OF Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes with Trail: GUDE$CUT-OFF RD MIDWAYRD SELVITZ RD COUNTY 2.27 MOBIUTY ROAD AREA Complex $ 39,935,920 98,932 HIGH$$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2W4 Lanes with Complete MIDWAYRD EAST TORINO PKWY SELVITZ RD COUNTY 1.32 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex $ 23,159,585 68,426 HIGH$$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes with Complete PORT ST LUCIE BLVD BECKER RD PAAR DR CITY 1.19 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex $ 20,000,000 61,623 HIGH $$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF WX)enfrom 2W4 Lanes with Complete SAVONA BLVD GATLIN BLVD CALIFORNIA BLVD CITY 1.08 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex with ROW $ 37,986,419 56,116 HIGH $$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widenfrom 2W4 Lanes with Complete SELVITZ RD BAYSHORE BLVD MIDWAYRD CITY 2.86 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Street Elements: Complex $ 50,321,048 148,676 HIGH$$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widen from 2 to 4 Lanes with Complete SOUTHBEND BLVD SE OAKRIDGE DR BECKER RD CITY 4.18 MOBIUTY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 49,913,859 217,322 HIGH$$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Potential Widening from 4 to 6 Lanes with ST LUCIE WEST BLVD I-95 CASHMERE BLVD CITY 2.19 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Complete Street Elements $ 20,313,817 106,166 HIGH$$$ NO WIDEN EXISTING WESTOF Widenfrom 2W4 Lanes with Complete TOR I N O PKWY(EAST) CASHMERE BLVD MIDWAYRD CITY 2.44 MOBILITY ROAD RIVER Street Elements $ 42950447 126,899 HIGH$$$ NO Ato, al of I6%(45.76) of the mobility plan miles (288.57) of improvements represents 67% Totslof High CM Roads 20.51 ($647,292,446) ofthe overallcost($971,]8],302) and is subjectochange, as are all $ 369,494,821 1,058,696 impr r-wr in the draft Phase One Mobility Plan. CouMy roads cmprise a total of 13.6%(36.65) of the Phase One Mobility Plan net miles (269.08). County road improvementVs represents 23.3% ($179,829,210 )of the overall net cost Totslof High Cost County Roads 3.58 ($769,8]3,98]). C-.y roads comprise .total of 13.05%(357,275) of the overall net multhr dal $ 63,095,504 167,358 wpafM (2,6]5,578). By: NUE Urban Concepts Version 1.3: 12/16/21 Page 93 of 381 Transportation c� St. Lucie Planning Organization January 4, 2022 Mr. John A. Titkanich, Jr., AICP, ICMA-CM Innovation and Performance Division Director St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue, Room 228 Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 RE: Review of Draft St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study Dear Mr. Titkanich: VIA EMAIL The St. Lucie Transportation Planning Organization (St. Lucie TPO) has reviewed the Draft St. Lucie County Road Impact Fee Study (Study) received from you via email on December 13th. Based on the review, the following comments are provided: • Obsolete Travel Demand Model: The Study identifies the use of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Model (TCRPM) Version 4.1 in the analyses. The TCRPM Version 4.1 was replaced with TCRPM Version 5 in February 2021 and is considered to be obsolete. The obsolete TCRPM Version 4.1 should be replaced with TCRPM Version 5 in the Study analyses. • Obsolete Cost Feasible Network/Plan and Inconsistent Information: On Page 10, the Study references the 2040 Cost Feasible Network/Plan as being included in the SmartMoves 2045 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP) and uses this 2040 Cost Feasible Network/Plan in the Study Analyses including in the calculation of Travel Adjustment Factors. The SmartMoves 2045 LRTP includes a 2045 Cost Feasible Network/Plan which replaced the 2040 Cost Feasible Network/Plan in February 2021. The Study should be revised to replace the obsolete 2040 Cost Feasible Network/Plan with the 2045 Cost Feasible Network/Plan in the Study analyses. • St. Lucie County Infrastructure Surtax: The Study does not include nor reference the St. Lucie County 2018 Sales Tax Referendum for infrastructure that provides local funding for roadway improvements including Edwards Road. The Study should be revised to include this funding source in the analyses or an adequate explanation of why this funding source is not included. • Local Construction Project Costs: On page 13 and in Tables B-5 and B-6, the Study identifies the costs of a limited number of local projects for the purpose of determining local project construction costs. However, the Study does not include the cost of a number of local projects such as the Transportation Planning for Fort Pierce, Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie Village and St. Lucie County Page 94 of 381 January 4, 2022 Page 2 of 2 recently -completed Crosstown Parkway, ongoing projects such as Port St. Lucie Boulevard and other projects in the St. Lucie TPO Transportation Improvement Program, and planned projects such as California Boulevard in the SmartMoves 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan (CFP). The Study should be revised to include a comprehensive review of the local projects completed, underway, programmed in the TIP, and planned in the SmartMoves 2045 LRTP CFP to provide a more accurate estimate of local construction costs and minimize the impacts of "extreme cost variation" and the "significant presence of outliers" as referenced in the Study. • Urban/Rural Classification: The Study classifies St. Lucie County as a "rural" county for the Study analyses with minimal explanation or justification despite the County including a more populous city (Port St. Lucie) than several of the counties, such as Broward and Palm Beach Counties, which apparently were utilized for the justification. This classification results in significant differences in construction costs between the rural and urban classifications that may result in underestimates of the costs for the development of the impact fee amounts. A thorough justification should be provided for the classification of St. Lucie County as a "rural" county, or St. Lucie County should be classified as an "urban" county. • Incorrect Information: The information in Table B-10 in the Study is incorrectly identified as from the SmartMoves 2045 LRTP Cost Feasible Plan and contains incorrect "Jurisdiction" information that is not included in the SmartMoves 2045 LRTP. Table B-10 should be revised to include the correct information from the SmartMoves 2045 LRTP and Cost Feasible Plan and the correct jurisdictional information. • Incorrect References: Throughout the Study, "St. Lucie County Smart Moves 2045 LRTP" should be changed to "St. Lucie TPO SmartMoves 2045 LRTP" for correctness. The St. Lucie TPO appreciates the opportunity to review and provide comments regarding this important Study. Please contact me should any additional information or clarification be required with regard to this review. Sincerely, Peter Buchwald Executive Director cc: Howard Tipton, Administrator, St. Lucie County Joseph Sabater, Impact Fee Program Manager, St. Lucie County Russ Blackburn, City Manager, City of Port St. Lucie Page 95 of 381 11, 11 � 11: - I E CC IN N T 7 TO: PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: AGENDA REQUEST Board of County Commissioners Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney County Attorney 6.A. PROCLAMATIONS APPROVAL RES-2022-12 DATE: 2/1/2022 *RESOLUTION ITEM - PROCLAMATION Resolution No. 22-012 - Proclaiming the month of February 2022 as "2-1-1 Awareness Month" in St. Lucie County, Florida It has requested that this Board proclaim the month of February 2022 as "2-1-1 Awareness Month" in St. Lucie County, Florida. The attached resolution has been drafted for that purpose. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures Date: January 12, 2022 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: January 13, 2022 Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator Page 96 of 381 RESOLUTION NO. 22-012 A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING FEBRUARY 2022 AS "2-1-1 AWARENESS MONTH" IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida has made the following determinations: 1. St. Lucie County congratulates the 2-1-1 HelpLine for its 6 decades of quality and caring service to the community! 2. Over this span of time, the 2-1-1 HelpLine has responded to over 3 million requests for help from people of all walks of life providing the guidance and support they've needed; and 2-1-1 continued to do through these trying times. 3. Mental & Emotional Health, Addiction, Housing/Utilities, Food Insecurity and Health concerns are the top needs expressed by people reaching out to us. 4. Caring staff continue to be the beacon of hope providing crisis support when people are overwhelmed and do not know where to turn. The 2-1-1 Helpline is available anytime day or night. 5. 2-1-1 also has specialized advocacy and support programs that include "The Caregiver Support Project"; "My Florida Veterans" provides peer to peer support, and helps veterans to readjust, providing linkage to services for veterans and their families; and "Help Me Grow" catching children's development delays early. 6. 2-1-1's life-saving "Sunshine" Daily Telephone Reassurance Calls continue to brighten the lives of local isolated seniors and has expanded to include isolated caregivers. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board does hereby proclaim the month of February 2022 as "2-1-1 Awareness Month" and congratulate the 2-1-1 Helpline for their 6 decades of Service in St. Lucie County, Florida. 2. This Board urges all citizens to be aware that if they are overwhelmed and in crisis or just need to talk, 2-1-1 is available any time of day or night. 2-1-1 can also provide referrals for Mental Health Counseling, Substance Abuse, Health Care, Employment, Food Assistance, Day Care, Support Groups, Volunteering, VITA free income tax preparation and so much more. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 1st day of February 2022. ATTEST: DEPUTY CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY Page 97 of 381 6.13. PROCLAMATIONS APPROVAL TO: PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: AGENDA REQUEST Board of County Commissioners Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney County Attorney DATE: 2/1/2022 *RESOLUTION ITEM - PROCLAMATION Resolution No. 22-017 - Recognizing the Month of February 2022 as "National African American/Black History Month" in St. Lucie County, Florida It has been requested that this Board recognize the month of February 2022 as "National African American/Black History Month" in St. Lucie County, Florida. The attached resolution has been drafted for that purpose. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures Date: January 19, 2022 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: January 19, 2022 Alphonso Jefferson, Deputy County Administrator Page 98 of 381 RESOLUTION NO. 22-017 A RESOLUTION RECOGNIZING THE MONTH OF FEBRUARY 2022 AS "NATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN/BLACK HISTORY MONTH" CELEBRATING THE BLACK FAMILY: REPRESENTATION, IDENTITY AND DIVERSITY IN ST.LUCIECOUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Black History Month, or National African American History Month is an annual celebration of achievements by black Americans and a time for recognizing the central role of African Americans in U.S. history. 2. Each year, in February, an entire month of events are planned nationwide honoring the history and contributions of African Americans. The theme for National African American/Black History Month in 2022 is "The Black Family: Representation, Identity and Diversity". The black family has been a topic of study in many disciplines —history, literature, the visual arts and film studies, sociology, anthropology, and social policy. Its representation, identity, and diversity have been reverenced, stereotyped, and vilified from the days of slavery to our own time. 3. The black family knows no single location, since family reunions and genetic -ancestry searches testify to the spread of family members across states, nations, and continents. While the role of the black family has been described by some as a microcosm of the entire race, its complexity as the "foundation" of African American life and history can be seen in numerous debates over how to represent its meaning and typicality from a historical perspective —as slave or free, as patriarchal or matriarchal/matrifocal, as single -headed or dual -headed household, as extended or nuclear, as fictive kin or blood lineage, as legal or common law, and as black or interracial, etc. Variation appears, as well, in discussions on the nature and impact of parenting, childhood, marriage, gender norms, sexuality, and incarceration. The family offers a rich tapestry of images for exploring the African American past and present. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida that this Board does hereby proclaim February 2022 as "NATIONAL AFRICAN AMERICAN/BLACK HISTORY MONTH" in St. Lucie County, Florida and encourages all citizens to participate in all activities planned to celebrate National African American/Black History Month. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 1St day of February 2022. ATTEST: DEPUTY CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIR APPROVED AS TO FORM & CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY Page 99 of 381 6.C. PROCLAMATIONS APPROVAL EI IN N T 7 , T 60, -�!2 TO: PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: AGENDA REQUEST Board of County Commissioners Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney County Attorney DATE: 2/1/2022 *RESOLUTION ITEM - PROCLAMATION SUBJECT: Resolution No. 22-019 - Resolution Honoring the Fort Pierce Firehawks Pop Warner Football National Champions and Congratulating the Players, Coaches, Parents, and Family on this Historic Accomplishment BACKGROUND: It has been requested that this Board honor the Fort Piere Firehawks Pop Warner Football National Champions" in St. Lucie County, Florida. The attached resolution has been drafted for that purpose. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None N/ Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator Coordination/Signatures Date: January 19, 2022 Date: January 19, 2022 Page 100 of 381 RESOLUTION NO. 22-019 ARESOLUTION HONORING THE FORT PIERCE FIREHAWKS POP WARNER FOOTBALL NATIONAL CHAMPIONS AND CONGRATULATING THE PLAYERS, COACHES, PARENTS, AND FAMILY ON THIS HISTORIC ACCOMPLISHMENT IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. St. Lucie County has well developed youth sports programs that teach our next generation about competition, teamwork, sportsmanship, and life. 2. The Fort Pierce Firehawks Football team through hard work, dedication, and commitment played an exceptional season that culminated in these young athletes becoming the 2021 Division II Under 14 Pop Warner National Champions. 3. The Firehawks went undefeated in the regular season and in the playoffs finishing with a 17-0 record that included two wins in the Treasure Coast Football Conference, four wins in the Southeast Regional Championship, and three wins in the National Playoffs. 4. With a 26-point lead into the 3,d quarter, the Firehawks ultimately won the National Championship, defeating the Northampton Indians by a score of 38-12. 5. These young men demonstrated incredible athletic abilities against the best competition in America in their age group which brought great honor and pride to our sports loving community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida that this Board does hereby issue this proclamation in honor of the Fort Pierce Firehawks Pop Warner Football National Champions and congratulates the players, coaches, parents, and family on this historic accomplishment in St. Lucie County, Florida. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 1St day of February 2022. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIR APPROVED AS TO FORM & CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY Page 101 of 381 AGENDA REQUEST TO: Board of County Commissioners 8.A.1. 2022-54603 CONSENT AGENDA - AIR & SEA PORT DATE: 2/1/2022 *ACTION ITEM - GRANT ACCEPTANCE QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEM? No PRESENTED BY: Eric Konupka, Airport Manager SUBMITTED BY: Air & Sea Port SUBJECT: Grant Acceptance: Federal Aviation Administration - Airport Rescue Grant No. 3-12- 0023-039-2022 for Treasure Coast International Airport - THIS ITEM IS RELATED TO THE AMERICAN RESCUE PLAN BACKGROUND: This grant is provided in accordance with the American Rescue Plan Act, Public Law 117-2, to provide funding for costs related to operations, personnel, cleaning, sanitization, janitorial services, combating the spread of pathogens at the airport, and debt service payments. The grant allocation amount for Treasure Coast International Airport is $59,000, with no local match requirement. Funding under this grant may be used to reimburse airport operational expenses directly related to the airport no earlier than January 20, 2020. Debt service payments may also be reimbursable where such payments occur on or after March 11, 2021.In summary, funds provided by this grant will be governed by the same principles that govern "airport revenue". New airport development projects not directly related to combating the spread of pathogens may not be funded with this Grant. The allocation amount was derived by a legislative formula as defined by Section 7102 of the American Rescue Plan. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FINANCIAL IMPACT: This grant has no local match requirements. The total funding made available under this grant is $59,000. The account strings for this grant are: XXXXXXX-4210-552000-4200000 American Rescue Plan Act funds may be used to reimburse airport operational and maintenance expenses directly related to Treasure Coast International incurred no earlier than January 20, 2020. Page 102 of 381 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board acceptance of Federal Aviation Administration - Airport Rescue Grant No. 3-12- 0023-039-2022 for Treasure Coast International Airport in the amount of $59,000.00 for reimbursement of airport operations under the American Rescue Plan Act and authorization the Chair to sign these grant documents as approved by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures Date: January 14, 2022 Stan Payne, Director of Air & Sea Port Date: January 18, 2022 Jennifer Hill, Office of Management & Budget Director Date: January 18, 2022 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: January 19, 2022 Alphonso Jefferson, Deputy County Administrator Date: January 24, 2022 Howard Tipton, County Administrator Page 103 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 U.S. Department of Transportation tow Federal Aviation Administration January 19, 2022 Mr. Sean Mitchell Chairman St. Lucie Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida, 34982 Dear Mr. Mitchell: FAA ORL ADO Orlando Airports District Office: 8427 South Park Circle, Suite 524 Orlando, FL 32819 Please find the following electronic Airport Rescue Grant Offer, Grant No. 3-12-0023-039-2022 for Treasure Coast International Airport. This letter outlines expectations for success. Please read and follow the instructions carefully. To properly enter into this agreement, you must do the following: a. The governing body must provide authority to execute the grant to the individual signing the grant; i.e. the sponsor's authorized representative. b. The sponsor's authorized representative must execute the grant, followed by the attorney's certification, no later than February 15, 2022 in order for the grant to be valid. c. You may not make any modification to the text, terms or conditions of the grant offer. d. The grant offer must be digitally signed by the sponsor's legal signatory authority and then routed via email to the sponsor's attorney. Once the attorney has digitally attested to the grant, an email with the executed grant will be sent to all parties. Subject to the requirements in 2 CFR §200.305, each payment request for reimbursement under this grant must be made electronically via the Delphi elnvoicing System. Please see the attached Grant Agreement for more information regarding the use of this System. The terms and conditions of this agreement require you draw down and expend these funds within four years. An airport sponsor may use these funds for costs related to operations, personnel, cleaning, sanitization, janitorial services, combating the spread of pathogens at the airport, and debt service payments. Please refer to the Airport Rescue Grants Frequently Asked Questions for further information. With each payment request you are required to upload an invoice summary directly to Delphi. The invoice summary should include enough detail to permit FAA to verify compliance with the American Rescue Plan Act (Public Law 117-2). Additional details or invoices may be requested by FAA during the review of your payment requests. As part of your final payment request, you are required to include in Delphi: • A signed SF-425, Federal Financial Report • A signed closeout report. Page 104 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 Until the grant is completed and closed, you are responsible for submitting a signed and dated SF-425 annually, due 90 days after the end of each Federal fiscal year in which this grant is open (due December 31 of each year this grant is open). As a condition of receiving Federal assistance under this award, you must comply with audit requirements as established under 2 CFR part 200. Subpart F requires non -Federal entities that expend $750,000 or more in Federal awards to conduct a single or program specific audit for that year. Note that this includes Federal expenditures made under other Federal -assistance programs. Please take appropriate and necessary action to assure your organization will comply with applicable audit requirements and standards. I am readily available to assist you and your designated representative with the requirements stated herein. The FAA sincerely values your cooperation in these efforts. Sincerely, L Bart Vernace, P.E. Manager 2 Page 105 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration AIRPORT RESCUE GRANT GRANT AGREEMENT Part I - Offer Federal Award Offer Date January 19, 2022 Airport/Planning Area Treasure Coast International Airport Airport Rescue Grant No. 3-12-0023-039-2022 Unique Entity Identifier 072215403 TO: Board of County Commissioners, St. Lucie County (herein called the "Sponsor") FROM: The United States of America (acting through the Federal Aviation Administration, herein called the "FAA") WHEREAS, the Sponsor has submitted to the FAA an Airport Rescue Grant Application dated July 20, 2021, for a grant of Federal funds at or associated with the Treasure Coast International Airport, which is included as part of this Airport Rescue Grant Agreement; WHEREAS, the Sponsor has accepted the terms of FAA's Airport Rescue Grant offer; WHEREAS, in consideration of the promises, representations and assurances provided by the Sponsor, the FAA has approved the Airport Rescue Grant Application for the Treasure Coast International Airport, (herein called the "Grant" or "Airport Rescue Grant") consisting of the following: WHEREAS, this Airport Rescue Grant is provided in accordance with the American Rescue Plan Act "ARP Act", or "the Act"), Public Law 117-2, as described below, to provide eligible Sponsors with funding for costs related to operations, personnel, cleaning, sanitization, janitorial services, combating the spread of pathogens at the airport, and debt service payments. Airport Rescue Grant amounts to specific airports are derived by legislative formula (See Section 7102 of the Act). WHEREAS, the purpose of this Airport Rescue Grant is to prevent, prepare for, and respond to the coronavirus pandemic. Funds provided under this Airport Rescue Grant Agreement must be used only for purposes directly related to the airport. Such purposes can include the reimbursement of an airport's operational expenses or debt service payments in accordance with the limitations prescribed in the Act. 3 Page 106 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 Airport Rescue Grants may be used to reimburse airport operational expenses directly related to Treasure Coast International incurred no earlier than January 20, 2020. Airport Rescue Grants also may be used to reimburse a Sponsor's payment of debt service where such payments occur on or after March 11, 2021. Funds provided under this Airport Rescue Grant Agreement will be governed by the same principles that govern "airport revenue." New airport development projects not directly related to combating the spread of pathogens may not be funded with this Grant. Funding under this Grant for airport development projects to combat the spread of pathogens will be reallocated using an addendum to this Agreement for identified and approved projects. NOW THEREFORE, in accordance with the applicable provisions of the ARP Act, Public Law 117-2, the representations contained in the Grant Application, and in consideration of (a) the Sponsor's acceptance of this Offer; and, (b) the benefits to accrue to the United States and the public from the accomplishment of the Grant and in compliance with the conditions as herein provided, THE FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION, FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE UNITED STATES, HEREBY OFFERS AND AGREES to pay 100% percent of the allowable costs incurred as a result of and in accordance with this Grant Agreement. Assistance Listings Number (Formerly CFDA Number): 20.106 This Offer is made on and SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING TERMS AND CONDITIONS: CONDITIONS Maximum Obligation. The maximum obligation of the United States payable under this Offer is $59,000, allocated as follows: $59,000 ARPA KW2022 Grant Performance. This Airport Rescue Grant Agreement is subject to the following Federal award requirements: a. The Period of Performance: Shall start on the date the Sponsor formally accepts this agreement, and is the date signed by the last Sponsor signatory to the agreement. The end date of the period of performance is 4 years (1,460 calendar days) from the date of acceptance. The period of performance end date shall not affect, relieve, or reduce Sponsor obligations and assurances that extend beyond the closeout of this Grant Agreement. 2. Means the total estimated time interval between the start of an initial Federal award and the planned end date, which may include one or more funded portions, or budget periods. (2 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) § 200.1) b. The Budget Period: 1. For this Airport Rescue Grant is 4 years (1,460 calendar days). Pursuant to 2 CFR § 200.403(h), the Sponsor may charge to the Grant only allowable costs incurred during the budget period. Means the time interval from the start date of a funded portion of an award to the end date of that funded portion during which the Sponsor is authorized to expend the funds awarded, including any funds carried forward or other revisions pursuant to § 200.308. c. Close out and Termination. 4 Page 107 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 1. Unless the FAA authorizes a written extension, the Sponsor must submit all Grant closeout documentation and liquidate (pay-off) all obligations incurred under this award no later than 120 calendar days after the end date of the period of performance. If the Sponsor does not submit all required closeout documentation within this time period, the FAA will proceed to close out the Grant within one year of the period of performance end date with the information available at the end of 120 days. (2 CFR § 200.344) The FAA may terminate this Airport Rescue Grant, in whole or in part, in accordance with the conditions set forth in 2 CFR § 200.340, or other Federal regulatory or statutory authorities as applicable. 3. Unallowable Costs. The Sponsor shall not seek reimbursement for any costs that the FAA has determined to be unallowable under the ARP Act. 4. Indirect Costs - Sponsor. The Sponsor may charge indirect costs under this award by applying the indirect cost rate identified in the Grant Application as accepted by the FAA, to allowable costs for Sponsor direct salaries and wages only. 5. Final Federal Share of Costs. The United States' share of allowable Grant costs is 100%. 6. Completing the Grant without Delay and in Conformance with Requirements. The Sponsor must carry out and complete the Grant without undue delays and in accordance with this Airport Rescue Grant Agreement, the ARP Act, and the regulations, policies, standards, and procedures of the Secretary of Transportation ("Secretary"). Pursuant to 2 CFR § 200.308, the Sponsor agrees to report to the FAA any disengagement from funding eligible expenses under the Grant that exceeds three months or a 25 percent reduction in time devoted to the Grant, and request prior approval from FAA. The report must include a reason for the stoppage. The Sponsor agrees to comply with the attached assurances, which are part of this agreement and any addendum that may be attached hereto at a later date by mutual consent. 7. Amendments or Withdrawals before Grant Acceptance. The FAA reserves the right to amend or withdraw this offer at any time prior to its acceptance by the Sponsor. 8. Offer Expiration Date. This offer will expire and the United States will not be obligated to pay any part of the costs unless this offer has been accepted by the Sponsor on or before February 15, 2022, or such subsequent date as may be prescribed in writing by the FAA. 9. Improper Use of Federal Funds. The Sponsor must take all steps, including litigation if necessary, to recover Federal funds spent fraudulently, wastefully, or in violation of Federal antitrust statutes, or misused in any other manner, including uses that violate this Airport Rescue Grant Agreement, the ARP Act, or other provision of applicable law. For the purposes of this Airport Rescue Grant Agreement, the term "Federal funds" means funds however used or dispersed by the Sponsor that were originally paid pursuant to this or any other Federal grant agreement(s). The Sponsor must return the recovered Federal share, including funds recovered by settlement, order, or judgment, to the Secretary. The Sponsor must furnish to the Secretary, upon request, all documents and records pertaining to the determination of the amount of the Federal share or to any settlement, litigation, negotiation, or other efforts taken to recover such funds. All settlements or other final positions of the Sponsor, in court or otherwise, involving the recovery of such Federal share require advance approval by the Secretary. 10. United States Not Liable for Damage or Iniury. The United States is not responsible or liable for damage to property or injury to persons which may arise from, or relate to this Airport Rescue 5 Page 108 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 Grant Agreement, including, but not limited to, any action taken by a Sponsor related to or arising from, directly or indirectly, this Airport Rescue Grant Agreement. 11. System for Award Management (SAM) Registration and Unique Entity Identifier (UEI). Requirement for System for Award Management (SAM): Unless the Sponsor is exempted from this requirement under 2 CFR 25.110, the Sponsor must maintain the currency of its information in SAM until the Sponsor submits the final financial report required under this Grant, or receives the final payment, whichever is later. This requires that the Sponsor review and update the information at least annually after the initial registration and more frequently if required by changes in information or another award term. Additional information about registration procedures may be found at the SAM website (currently at http://www.sam.gov). Unique entity identifier (UEI) means a 12-character alpha -numeric value used to identify a specific commercial, nonprofit or governmental entity. A UEI may be obtained from SAM.gov at https://sam.gov/SAM/pages/public/index.isf. 12. Electronic Grant Payment(s). Unless otherwise directed by the FAA, the Sponsor must make each payment request under this agreement electronically via the Delphi elnvoicing System for Department of Transportation (DOT) Financial Assistance Awardees. 13. Air and Water Quality. The Sponsor is required to comply with all applicable air and water quality standards for all projects in this grant. If the Sponsor fails to comply with this requirement, the FAA may suspend, cancel, or terminate this Agreement. 14. Financial Reporting and Payment Requirements. The Sponsor will comply with all Federal financial reporting requirements and payment requirements, including submittal of timely and accurate reports. 15. Buy American. Unless otherwise approved in advance by the FAA, in accordance with 49 United States Code (U.S.C.) § 50101, the Sponsor will not acquire or permit any contractor or subcontractor to acquire any steel or manufactured goods produced outside the United States to be used for any project for which funds are provided under this grant. The Sponsor will include a provision implementing Buy American in every contract. 16. Audits for Sponsors. PUBLIC SPONSORS. The Sponsor must provide for a Single Audit or program -specific audit in accordance with 2 CFR Part 200. The Sponsor must submit the audit reporting package to the Federal Audit Clearinghouse on the Federal Audit Clearinghouse's Internet Data Entry System at http://harvester.census.gov/facweb/. Upon request of the FAA, the Sponsor shall provide one copy of the completed audit to the FAA. 17. Suspension or Debarment. When entering into a "covered transaction" as defined by 2 CFR § 180.200, the Sponsor must: a. Verify the non -Federal entity is eligible to participate in this Federal program by: Checking the excluded parties list system (EPLS) as maintained within the System for Award Management (SAM) to determine if the non -Federal entity is excluded or disqualified; or 2. Collecting a certification statement from the non -Federal entity attesting the entity is not excluded or disqualified from participating; or 0 Page 109 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 3. Adding a clause or condition to covered transactions attesting the individual or firm is not excluded or disqualified from participating. b. Require prime contractors to comply with 2 CFR § 180.330 when entering into lower -tier transactions (e.g., subcontracts). c. Immediately disclose to the FAA whenever the Sponsor (1) learns the Sponsor has entered into a covered transaction with an ineligible entity, or (2) suspends or debars a contractor, person, or entity. 18. Ban on Texting While Driving. a. In accordance with Executive Order 13513, Federal Leadership on Reducing Text Messaging While Driving, October 1, 2009, and DOT Order 3902.10, Text Messaging While Driving, December 30, 2009, the Sponsor is encouraged to: 1. Adopt and enforce workplace safety policies to decrease crashes caused by distracted drivers, including policies to ban text messaging while driving when performing any work for, or on behalf of, the Federal government, including work relating to this Airport Rescue Grant or subgrant funded by this Grant. Conduct workplace safety initiatives in a manner commensurate with the size of the business, such as: A. Establishment of new rules and programs or re-evaluation of existing programs to prohibit text messaging while driving; and B. Education, awareness, and other outreach to employees about the safety risks associated with texting while driving. b. The Sponsor must insert the substance of this clause on banning texting while driving in all subgrants, contracts, and subcontracts funded by this Airport Rescue Grant. 19. Trafficking in Persons. a. You as the recipient, your employees, subrecipients under this Airport Rescue Grant, and subrecipients' employees may not — 1. Engage in severe forms of trafficking in persons during the period of time that the award is in effect; 2. Procure a commercial sex act during the period of time that the award is in effect; or 3. Use forced labor in the performance of the award or subawards under the Airport Rescue Grant. b. The FAA as the Federal awarding agency may unilaterally terminate this award, without penalty, if you or a subrecipient that is a private entity — 1. Is determined to have violated a prohibition in paragraph a. of this Airport Rescue Grant Agreement term; or 2. Has an employee who is determined by the agency official authorized to terminate the Airport Rescue Grant Agreement to have violated a prohibition in paragraph a. of this Airport Rescue Grant term through conduct that is either — A. Associated with performance under this Airport Rescue Grant; or 7 Page 110 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 B. Imputed to the subrecipient using the standards and due process for imputing the conduct of an individual to an organization that are provided in 2 CFR Part 180, "OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Government -wide Debarment and Suspension (Non procurement),"as implemented by the FAA at 2 CFR Part 1200. c. You must inform us immediately of any information you receive from any source alleging a violation of a prohibition in paragraph a. of this Grant condition during this Airport Rescue Grant Agreement. d. Our right to terminate unilaterally that is described in paragraph a. of this Grant condition: Implements section 106(g) of the Trafficking Victims Protection Act of 2000 (TVPA), as amended (22 U.S.C. § 7104(g)), and 2. Is in addition to all other remedies for noncompliance that are available to the FAA under this Airport Rescue Grant. 20. Employee Protection from Reprisal. a. Prohibition of Reprisals — 1. In accordance with 41 U.S.C. § 4712, an employee of a grantee or subgrantee may not be discharged, demoted, or otherwise discriminated against as a reprisal for disclosing to a person or body described in sub -paragraph (a)(2) of this Grant condition, information that the employee reasonably believes is evidence of: a. Gross mismanagement of a Federal grant; b. Gross waste of Federal funds; c. An abuse of authority relating to implementation or use of Federal funds; d. A substantial and specific danger to public health or safety; or e. A violation of law, rule, or regulation related to a Federal grant. 2. Persons and bodies covered: The persons and bodies to which a disclosure by an employee is covered are as follows: a. A member of Congress or a representative of a committee of Congress; b. An Inspector General; c. The Government Accountability Office; d. A Federal employee responsible for oversight or management of a grant program at the relevant agency; e. A court or grand jury; f. A management official or other employee of the Sponsor, contractor, or subcontractor who has the responsibility to investigate, discover, or address misconduct; or g. An authorized official of the Department of Justice or other law enforcement agency. 3. Submission of Complaint — A person who believes that they have been subjected to a reprisal prohibited by paragraph a. of this Airport Rescue Grant Agreement may submit a complaint regarding the reprisal to the Office of Inspector General (OIG) for the U.S. Department of Transportation. 4. Time Limitation for Submittal of a Complaint —A complaint may not be brought under this subsection more than three years after the date on which the alleged reprisal took place. M Page 111 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 5. Required Actions of the Inspector General — Actions, limitations, and exceptions of the Inspector General's office are established under 41 U.S.C. § 4712(b). 6. Assumption of Rights to Civil Remedy — Upon receipt of an explanation of a decision not to conduct or continue an investigation by the Office of Inspector General, the person submitting a complaint assumes the right to a civil remedy under 41 U.S.C. § 4712(c). 21. Limitations. Nothing provided herein shall be construed to limit, cancel, annul, or modify the terms of any Federal grant agreement(s), including all terms and assurances related thereto, that have been entered into by the Sponsor and the FAA prior to the date of this Airport Rescue Grant Agreement. 22. Face Coverings Policy. The sponsor agrees to implement a face -covering (mask) policy to combat the spread of pathogens. This policy must include a requirement that all persons wear a mask, in accordance with Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and Transportation Security Administration (TSA) requirements, as applicable, at all times while in all public areas of the airport property, except to the extent exempted under those requirements. This special condition requires the airport sponsor continue to require masks until Executive Order 13998, Promoting COVID-19 Safety in Domestic and International Travel, is no longer effective. SPECIAL CONDITIONS FOR USE OF AIRPORT RESCUE GRANT FUNDS CONDITIONS FOR EQUIPMENT - 1. Equipment or Vehicle Replacement. The Sponsor agrees that when using funds provided by this Grant to replace equipment, the proceeds from the trade-in or sale of such replaced equipment shall be classified and used as airport revenue. Equipment Acquisition. The Sponsor agrees that for any equipment acquired with funds provided by this Grant, such equipment shall be used solely for purposes directly related to combating the spread of pathogens at the airport. 3. Low Emission Systems. The Sponsor agrees that vehicles and equipment acquired with funds provided in this Grant: a. Will be maintained and used at the airport for which they were purchased; and Will not be transferred, relocated, or used at another airport without the advance consent of the FAA. The Sponsor further agrees that it will maintain annual records on individual vehicles and equipment, project expenditures, cost effectiveness, and emission reductions. CONDITIONS FOR UTILITIES AND LAND - 4. Utilities Proration. For purposes of computing the United States' share of the allowable airport operations and maintenance costs, the allowable cost of utilities incurred by the Sponsor to operate and maintain airport(s) included in the Grant must not exceed the percent attributable to the capital or operating costs of the airport. Utility Relocation in Grant. The Sponsor understands and agrees that: a. The United States will not participate in the cost of any utility relocation unless and until the Sponsor has submitted evidence satisfactory to the FAA that the Sponsor is legally responsible for payment of such costs; 0 Page 112 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 b. FAA participation is limited to those utilities located on -airport or off -airport only where the Sponsor has an easement for the utility; and c. The utilities must serve a purpose directly related to the Airport. 10 Page 113 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 The Sponsor's acceptance of this Offer and ratification and adoption of the Airport Rescue Grant Application incorporated herein shall be evidenced by execution of this instrument by the Sponsor. The Offer and Acceptance shall comprise an Airport Rescue Grant Agreement, as provided by the ARP Act, constituting the contractual obligations and rights of the United States and the Sponsor with respect to this Grant. The effective date of this Airport Rescue Grant Agreement is the date of the Sponsor's acceptance of this Offer. Please read the following information: By signing this document, you are agreeing that you have reviewed the following consumer disclosure information and consent to transact business using electronic communications, to receive notices and disclosures electronically, and to utilize electronic signatures in lieu of using paper documents. You are not required to receive notices and disclosures or sign documents electronically. If you prefer not to do so, you may request to receive paper copies and withdraw your consent at any time. Dated January 19, 2022 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (Signature) Bart Vernace (Typed Name) Manager (Title of FAA Official) 11 Page 114 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 Part II - Acceptance The Sponsor does hereby ratify and adopt all assurances, statements, representations, warranties, covenants, and agreements contained in the Airport Rescue Grant Application and incorporated materials referred to in the foregoing Offer under Part I of this Airport Rescue Grant Agreement, and does hereby accept this Offer and by such acceptance agrees to comply with all of the terms and conditions in this Offer and in the Airport Rescue Grant Application and all applicable terms and conditions provided for in the ARP Act and other applicable provisions of Federal law. Please read the following information: By signing this document, you are agreeing that you have reviewed the following consumer disclosure information and consent to transact business using electronic communications, to receive notices and disclosures electronically, and to utilize electronic signatures in lieu of using paper documents. You are not required to receive notices and disclosures or sign documents electronically. If you prefer not to do so, you may request to receive paper copies and withdraw your consent at any time. I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. 1 Dated Board of County Commissioners, St. Lucie County (Name of Sponsor) (Signature of Sponsor's Designative Official/Representative) By: (Type Name of Sponsor's Designative Official/Representative) Title: (Title of Sponsor's Designative Official/Representative) 1 Knowingly and willfully providing false information to the Federal government is a violation of 18 U.S.C. Section 1001 (False Statements) and could subject you to fines, imprisonment, or both. 12 Page 115 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 CERTIFICATE OF SPONSOR'S ATTORNEY , acting as Attorney for the Sponsor do hereby certify: That in my opinion the Sponsor is empowered to enter into the foregoing Grant Agreement under the laws of the State of Florida . Further, I have examined the foregoing Grant Agreement and the actions taken by said Sponsor and Sponsor's official representative has been duly authorized and that the execution thereof is in all respects due and proper and in accordance with the laws of the said State and the ARP Act. The Sponsor understands funding made available under this Grant Agreement may only be used for costs related to operations, personnel, cleaning, sanitization, janitorial services, and combating the spread of pathogens at the airport incurred on or after January 20, 2020, or for debt service payments that are due on or after March 11, 2021. Further, it is my opinion the foregoing Grant Agreement constitutes a legal and binding obligation of the Sponsor in accordance with the terms thereof. Please read the following information: By signing this document, you are agreeing that you have reviewed the following consumer disclosure information and consent to transact business using electronic communications, to receive notices and disclosures electronically, and to utilize electronic signatures in lieu of using paper documents. You are not required to receive notices and disclosures or sign documents electronically. If you prefer not to do so, you may request to receive paper copies and withdraw your consent at any time. Dated at By: (Signature of Sponsor's Attorney) 13 Page 116 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 AIRPORT RESCUE GRANT ASSURANCES AIRPORT SPONSORS A. General. 1. These Airport Rescue Grant Assurances are required to be submitted as part of the application by sponsors requesting funds under the provisions of the American Rescue Plan Act of 2021 ("ARP Act," or "the Act"), Public Law 117-2. As used herein, the term "public agency sponsor" means a public agency with control of a public -use airport; the term "private sponsor" means a private owner of a public -use airport; and the term "sponsor" includes both public agency sponsors and private sponsors. 2. Upon acceptance of this Airport Rescue Grant offer by the sponsor, these assurances are incorporated into and become part of this Airport Rescue Grant Agreement. B. Sponsor Certification. The sponsor hereby assures and certifies, with respect to this Airport Rescue Grant that: It will comply with all applicable Federal laws, regulations, executive orders, policies, guidelines, and requirements as they relate to the application, acceptance, and use of Federal funds for this Airport Rescue Grant including but not limited to the following: FEDERAL LEGISLATION a. 49 U.S.C. Chapter 471, as applicable b. Davis -Bacon Act — 40 U.S.C. 276(a), et. seq. c. Federal Fair Labor Standards Act — 29 U.S.C. 201, et. seq. d. Hatch Act — 5 U.S.C. 1501, et. seg.2 e. Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 Title 42 U.S.C. 4601, et. seq. f. National Historic Preservation Act of 1966 — Section 106 — 16 U.S.C. 470(f). g. Archeological and Historic Preservation Act of 1974 — 16 U.S.C. 469 through 469c. h. Native Americans Grave Repatriation Act — 25 U.S.C. Section 3001, et. seq. i. Clean Air Act, P.L. 90-148, as amended. j. Coastal Zone Management Act, P.L. 93-205, as amended. k. Flood Disaster Protection Act of 1973 — Section 102(a) — 42 U.S.C. 4012a. I. Title 49, U.S.C., Section 303, (formerly known as Section 4(f)). m. Rehabilitation Act of 1973 — 29 U.S.C. 794. n. Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq., 78 stat. 252) (prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin). o. Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended, (42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq.), prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability). p. Age Discrimination Act of 1975 — 42 U.S.C. 6101, et. seq. 14 Page 117 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 q. American Indian Religious Freedom Act, P.L. 95-341, as amended. r. Architectural Barriers Act of 1968 — 42 U.S.C. 4151, et. seq. s. Power plant and Industrial Fuel Use Act of 1978 — Section 403- 2 U.S.C. 8373. t. Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act — 40 U.S.C. 327, et. seq. u. Copeland Anti -kickback Act — 18 U.S.C. 874.1. v. National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 — 42 U.S.C. 4321, et. seq. w. Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, P.L. 90-542, as amended. x. Single Audit Act of 1984 — 31 U.S.C. 7501, et. seg.Z y. Drug -Free Workplace Act of 1988 — 41 U.S.C. 702 through 706. z. The Federal Funding Accountability and Transparency Act of 2006, as amended (Pub. L. 109-282, as amended by section 6202 of Pub. L. 110-252). EXECUTIVE ORDERS a. Executive Order 11246 — Equal Employment Opportunity b. Executive Order 11990 — Protection of Wetlands c. Executive Order 11998 — Flood Plain Management d. Executive Order 12372 — Intergovernmental Review of Federal Programs e. Executive Order 12699 — Seismic Safety of Federal and Federally Assisted New Building Construction f. Executive Order 12898 — Environmental Justice g. Executive Order 14005 — Ensuring the Future Is Made in All of America by All of America's Workers. FEDERAL REGULATIONS a. 2 CFR Part 180 — OMB Guidelines to Agencies on Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension (Nonprocurement). b. 2 CFR Part 200 — Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit Requirements for Federal Awards.3,4 c. 2 CFR Part 1200 — Nonprocurement Suspension and Debarment. d. 28 CFR Part 35 — Discrimination on the Basis of Disability in State and Local Government Services. e. 28 CFR § 50.3 — U.S. Department of Justice Guidelines for Enforcement of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. f. 29 CFR Part 1— Procedures for predetermination of wage rates.' g. 29 CFR Part 3 — Contractors and subcontractors on public building or public work financed in whole or part by loans or grants from the United States.' 15 Page 118 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 h. 29 CFR Part 5 — Labor standards provisions applicable to contracts covering Federally financed and assisted construction (also labor standards provisions applicable to non -construction contracts subject to the Contract Work Hours and Safety Standards Act).' i. 41 CFR Part 60 — Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs, Equal Employment Opportunity, Department of Labor (Federal and Federally assisted contracting requirements).' j. 49 CFR Part 20 — New restrictions on lobbying. k. 49 CFR Part 21— Nondiscrimination in Federally -assisted programs of the Department of Transportation - effectuation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. I. 49 CFR Part 23 — Participation by Disadvantage Business Enterprise in Airport Concessions. m. 49 CFR Part 26 — Participation by Disadvantaged Business Enterprises in Department of Transportation Program. n. 49 CFR Part 27 — Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs and Activities Receiving or Benefiting from Federal Financial Assistance.' o. 49 CFR Part 28 — Enforcement of Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Handicap in Programs or Activities conducted by the Department of Transportation. p. 49 CFR Part 30 — Denial of public works contracts to suppliers of goods and services of countries that deny procurement market access to U.S. contractors. q. 49 CFR Part 32 — Government -wide Requirements for Drug -Free Workplace (Financial Assistance). r. 49 CFR Part 37 —Transportation Services for Individuals with Disabilities (ADA). s. 49 CFR Part 41— Seismic safety of Federal and Federally assisted or regulated new building construction. FOOTNOTES TO AIRPORT RESCUE GRANT ASSURANCE B ' These laws do not apply to airport planning sponsors. Z These laws do not apply to private sponsors. 3 Cost principles established in 2 CFR Part 200 subpart E must be used as guidelines for determining the eligibility of specific types of expenses. 4 Audit requirements established in 2 CFR Part 200 subpart F are the guidelines for audits. SPECIFIC ASSURANCES Specific assurances required to be included in grant agreements by any of the above laws, regulations, or circulars are incorporated by reference in this Grant Agreement. 1. Purpose Directly Related to the Airport It certifies that the reimbursement sought is for a purpose directly related to the airport. 2. Responsibility and Authority of the Sponsor. a. Public Agency Sponsor: It has legal authority to apply for this Grant, and to finance and carry out the proposed grant; that an official decision has been made by the applicant's governing body authorizing the filing of the application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing 16 Page 119 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the applicant to act in connection with the application and to provide such additional information as may be required. b. Private Sponsor: It has legal authority to apply for this Grant and to finance and carry out the proposed Grant and comply with all terms, conditions, and assurances of this Grant Agreement. It shall designate an official representative and shall in writing direct and authorize that person to file this application, including all understandings and assurances contained therein; to act in connection with this application; and to provide such additional information as may be required. 3. Good Title. It, a public agency or the Federal government, holds good title, satisfactory to the Secretary, to the landing area of the airport or site thereof, or will give assurance satisfactory to the Secretary that good title will be acquired. 4. Preserving Rights and Powers. It will not take or permit any action which would operate to deprive it of any of the rights and powers necessary to perform any or all of the terms, conditions, and assurances in this Grant Agreement without the written approval of the Secretary, and will act promptly to acquire, extinguish, or modify any outstanding rights or claims of right of others which would interfere with such performance by the sponsor. This shall be done in a manner acceptable to the Secretary. b. If the sponsor is a private sponsor, it will take steps satisfactory to the Secretary to ensure that the airport will continue to function as a public -use airport in accordance with this Grant Agreement. c. If an arrangement is made for management and operation of the airport by any agency or person other than the sponsor or an employee of the sponsor, the sponsor will reserve sufficient rights and authority to insure that the airport will be operated and maintained in accordance Title 49, United States Code, the regulations, and the terms and conditions of this Grant Agreement. S. Consistency with Local Plans. Any project undertaken by this Grant Agreement is reasonably consistent with plans (existing at the time of submission of the Airport Rescue Grant application) of public agencies that are authorized by the State in which the project is located to plan for the development of the area surrounding the airport. 6. Consideration of Local Interest. It has given fair consideration to the interest of communities in or near where any project undertaken by this Grant Agreement may be located. 7. Consultation with Users. In making a decision to undertake any airport development project undertaken by this Grant Agreement, it has undertaken reasonable consultations with affected parties using the airport at which project is proposed. 17 Page 120 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 8. Pavement Preventative Maintenance. With respect to a project undertaken by this Grant Agreement for the replacement or reconstruction of pavement at the airport, it assures or certifies that it has implemented an effective airport pavement maintenance -management program and it assures that it will use such program for the useful life of any pavement constructed, reconstructed, or repaired with Federal financial assistance at the airport, including Airport Rescue Grant funds provided under this Grant Agreement. It will provide such reports on pavement condition and pavement management programs as the Secretary determines may be useful. 9. Accounting System, Audit, and Record Keeping Requirements. It shall keep all Grant accounts and records which fully disclose the amount and disposition by the recipient of the proceeds of this Grant, the total cost of the Grant in connection with which this Grant is given or used, and the amount or nature of that portion of the cost of the Grant supplied by other sources, and such other financial records pertinent to the Grant. The accounts and records shall be kept in accordance with an accounting system that will facilitate an effective audit in accordance with the Single Audit Act of 1984. It shall make available to the Secretary and the Comptroller General of the United States, or any of their duly authorized representatives, for the purpose of audit and examination, any books, documents, papers, and records of the recipient that are pertinent to this Grant. The Secretary may require that an appropriate audit be conducted by a recipient. In any case in which an independent audit is made of the accounts of a sponsor relating to the disposition of the proceeds of a Grant or relating to the Grant in connection with which this Grant was given or used, it shall file a certified copy of such audit with the Comptroller General of the United States not later than six (6) months following the close of the fiscal year for which the audit was made. 10. Minimum Wage Rates. It shall include, in all contracts in excess of $2,000 for work on the airport funded under this Grant Agreement which involve labor, provisions establishing minimum rates of wages, to be predetermined by the Secretary of Labor, in accordance with the Davis -Bacon Act, as amended (40 U.S.C. 276a-276a-5), which contractors shall pay to skilled and unskilled labor, and such minimum rates shall be stated in the invitation for bids and shall be included in proposals or bids for the work. 11. Veteran's Preference. It shall include in all contracts for work on any airport development project funded under this Grant Agreement which involve labor, such provisions as are necessary to insure that, in the employment of labor (except in executive, administrative, and supervisory positions), preference shall be given to Vietnam -era veterans, Persian Gulf veterans, Afghanistan -Iraq war veterans, disabled veterans, and small business concerns owned and controlled by disabled veterans as defined in Section 47112 of Title 49, United States Code. However, this preference shall apply only where the individuals are available and qualified to perform the work to which the employment relates. 12. Operation and Maintenance. a. The airport and all facilities which are necessary to serve the aeronautical users of the airport, other than facilities owned or controlled by the United States, shall be operated at all times in a safe and serviceable condition and in accordance with the minimum standards as may be required or prescribed by applicable Federal, State and local agencies for maintenance and 18 Page 121 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 operation. It will not cause or permit any activity or action thereon which would interfere with its use for airport purposes. It will suitably operate and maintain the airport and all facilities thereon or connected therewith, with due regard to climatic and flood conditions. Any proposal to temporarily close the airport for non -aeronautical purposes must first be approved by the Secretary. In furtherance of this assurance, the sponsor will have in effect arrangements for: 1. Operating the airport's aeronautical facilities whenever required; 2. Promptly marking and lighting hazards resulting from airport conditions, including temporary conditions; and Promptly notifying airmen of any condition affecting aeronautical use of the airport. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to require that the airport be operated for aeronautical use during temporary periods when snow, flood or other climatic conditions interfere with such operation and maintenance. Further, nothing herein shall be construed as requiring the maintenance, repair, restoration, or replacement of any structure or facility which is substantially damaged or destroyed due to an act of God or other condition or circumstance beyond the control of the sponsor. b. It will suitably operate and maintain noise compatibility program items that it owns or controls upon which Federal funds have been expended. 13. Hazard Removal and Mitigation. It will take appropriate action to assure that such terminal airspace as is required to protect instrument and visual operations to the airport (including established minimum flight altitudes) will be adequately cleared and protected by removing, lowering, relocating, marking, or lighting or otherwise mitigating existing airport hazards and by preventing the establishment or creation of future airport hazards. 14. Compatible Land Use. It will take appropriate action, to the extent reasonable, including the adoption of zoning laws, to restrict the use of land adjacent to or in the immediate vicinity of the airport to activities and purposes compatible with normal airport operations, including landing and takeoff of aircraft. 15. Exclusive Rights. The sponsor shall not grant an exclusive right to use an air navigation facility on which this Grant has been expended. However, providing services at an airport by only one fixed -based operator is not an exclusive right if — it is unreasonably costly, burdensome, or impractical for more than one fixed -based operator to provide the services; and allowing more than one fixed -based operator to provide the services requires a reduction in space leased under an agreement existing on September 3, 1982, between the operator and the airport. 16. Airport Revenues. This Grant shall be available for any purpose for which airport revenues may lawfully be used to prevent, prepare for, and respond to coronavirus. Funds provided under this Airport Rescue Grant Agreement will only be expended for the capital or operating costs of the airport; the local airport system; or other local facilities which are owned or operated by the owner or operator of the airport(s) subject to this agreement and all applicable addendums for costs 19 Page 122 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 related to operations, personnel, cleaning, sanitization, janitorial services, combating the spread of pathogens at the airport, and debt service payments as prescribed in the Act. b. For airport development, 49 U.S.C. § 47133 applies. 17. Reports and Inspections. It will: a. submit to the Secretary such annual or special financial and operations reports as the Secretary may reasonably request and make such reports available to the public; make available to the public at reasonable times and places a report of the airport budget in a format prescribed by the Secretary; b. in a format and time prescribed by the Secretary, provide to the Secretary and make available to the public following each of its fiscal years, an annual report listing in detail: all amounts paid by the airport to any other unit of government and the purposes for which each such payment was made; and 2. all services and property provided by the airport to other units of government and the amount of compensation received for provision of each such service and property. 18. Land for Federal Facilities. It will furnish without cost to the Federal Government for use in connection with any air traffic control or air navigation activities, or weather -reporting and communication activities related to air traffic control, any areas of land or water, or estate therein, or rights in buildings of the sponsor as the Secretary considers necessary or desirable for construction, operation, and maintenance at Federal expense of space or facilities for such purposes. Such areas or any portion thereof will be made available as provided herein within four months after receipt of a written request from the Secretary. 19. Airport Layout Plan. a. Subject to the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, Public Law 115-254, Section 163, it will keep up to date at all times an airport layout plan of the airport showing: 1. boundaries of the airport and all proposed additions thereto, together with the boundaries of all offsite areas owned or controlled by the sponsor for airport purposes and proposed additions thereto; 2. the location and nature of all existing and proposed airport facilities and structures (such as runways, taxiways, aprons, terminal buildings, hangars and roads), including all proposed extensions and reductions of existing airport facilities; 3. the location of all existing and proposed non -aviation areas and of all existing improvements thereon; and 4. all proposed and existing access points used to taxi aircraft across the airport's property boundary. Such airport layout plans and each amendment, revision, or modification thereof, shall be subject to the approval of the Secretary which approval shall be evidenced by the signature of a duly authorized representative of the Secretary on the face of the airport layout plan. The sponsor will not make or permit any changes or alterations in the airport or any of its facilities which are not in conformity with the airport layout plan 20 Page 123 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 as approved by the Secretary and which might, in the opinion of the Secretary, adversely affect the safety, utility or efficiency of the airport. Subject to the FAA Reauthorization Act of 2018, Public Law 115-254, Section 163, if a change or alteration in the airport or the facilities is made which the Secretary determines adversely affects the safety, utility, or efficiency of any federally owned, leased, or funded property on or off the airport and which is not in conformity with the airport layout plan as approved by the Secretary, the owner or operator will, if requested, by the Secretary (1) eliminate such adverse effect in a manner approved by the Secretary; or (2) bear all costs of relocating such property (or replacement thereof) to a site acceptable to the Secretary and all costs of restoring such property (or replacement thereof) to the level of safety, utility, efficiency, and cost of operation existing before the unapproved change in the airport or its facilities except in the case of a relocation or replacement of an existing airport facility due to a change in the Secretary's design standards beyond the control of the airport sponsor. 20. Civil Rights. It will promptly take any measures necessary to ensure that no person in the United States shall, on the grounds of race, creed, color, national origin, sex, age, or disability be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination in any activity conducted with, or benefiting from, funds received from this Grant. Using the definitions of activity, facility, and program as found and defined in §§ 21.23 (b) and 21.23 (e) of 49 CFR Part 21, the sponsor will facilitate all programs, operate all facilities, or conduct all programs in compliance with all non-discrimination requirements imposed by or pursuant to these assurances. b. Applicability Programs and Activities. If the sponsor has received a grant (or other Federal assistance) for any of the sponsor's program or activities, these requirements extend to all of the sponsor's programs and activities. Facilities. Where it receives a grant or other Federal financial assistance to construct, expand, renovate, remodel, alter, or acquire a facility, or part of a facility, the assurance extends to the entire facility and facilities operated in connection therewith. Real Property. Where the sponsor receives a grant or other Federal financial assistance in the form of, or for the acquisition of, real property or an interest in real property, the assurance will extend to rights to space on, over, or under such property. c. Duration The sponsor agrees that it is obligated to this assurance for the period during which Federal financial assistance is extended to the program, except where the Federal financial assistance is to provide, or is in the form of, personal property, or real property, or interest therein, or structures or improvements thereon, in which case the assurance obligates the sponsor, or any transferee for the longer of the following periods: 1. So long as the airport is used as an airport, or for another purpose involving the provision of similar services or benefits; or 2. So long as the sponsor retains ownership or possession of the property. d. Required Solicitation Language 21 Page 124 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 It will include the following notification in all solicitations for bids, Requests for Proposals for work, or material under this Grant and in all proposals for agreements, including airport concessions, regardless of funding source: "The Board of County Commissioners, St. Lucie County, in accordance with the provisions of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (78 Stat. 252, 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000d to 2000d-4) and the Regulations, hereby notifies all bidders that it will affirmatively ensure that for any contract entered into pursuant to this advertisement, disadvantaged business enterprises and airport concession disadvantaged business enterprises will be afforded full and fair opportunity to submit bids in response to this invitation and will not be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, or national origin in consideration for an award." e. Required Contract Provisions. 1. It will insert the non-discrimination contract clauses requiring compliance with the acts and regulations relative to non-discrimination in Federally -assisted programs of the DOT, and incorporating the acts and regulations into the contracts by reference in every contract or agreement subject to the non-discrimination in Federally -assisted programs of the DOT Acts and regulations. 2. It will include a list of the pertinent non-discrimination authorities in every contract that is subject to the non-discrimination acts and regulations. 3. It will insert non-discrimination contract clauses as a covenant running with the land, in any deed from the United States effecting or recording a transfer of real property, structures, use, or improvements thereon or interest therein to a sponsor. 4. It will insert non-discrimination contract clauses prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, creed, sex, age, or handicap as a covenant running with the land, in any future deeds, leases, license, permits, or similar instruments entered into by the sponsor with other parties: A. For the subsequent transfer of real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, grant, or program; and B. For the construction or use of, or access to, space on, over, or under real property acquired or improved under the applicable activity, grant, or program. C. It will provide for such methods of administration for the program as are found by the Secretary to give reasonable guarantee that it, other recipients, sub -recipients, sub - grantees, contractors, subcontractors, consultants, transferees, successors in interest, and other participants of Federal financial assistance under such program will comply with all requirements imposed or pursuant to the acts, the regulations, and this assurance. D. It agrees that the United States has a right to seek judicial enforcement with regard to any matter arising under the acts, the regulations, and this assurance. 21. Foreign Market Restrictions. It will not allow funds provided under this Grant to be used to fund any activity that uses any product or service of a foreign country during the period in which such foreign country is listed by the United States Trade Representative as denying fair and equitable market opportunities for products and suppliers of the United States in procurement and construction. 22 Page 125 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 22. Policies, Standards and Specifications. It will carry out any project funded under an Airport Rescue Grant in accordance with policies, standards, and specifications approved by the Secretary including, but not limited to, current FAA Advisory Circulars for AIP projects, as of July 20, 2021. 23. Access By Intercity Buses. The airport owner or operator will permit, to the maximum extent practicable, intercity buses or other modes of transportation to have access to the airport; however, it has no obligation to fund special facilities for intercity buses or for other modes of transportation. 24. Disadvantaged Business Enterprises. The sponsor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the award and performance of any DOT -assisted contract covered by 49 CFR Part 26, or in the award and performance of any concession activity contract covered by 49 CFR Part 23. In addition, the sponsor shall not discriminate on the basis of race, color, national origin or sex in the administration of its Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE) and Airport Concessions Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (ACDBE) programs or the requirements of 49 CFR Parts 23 and 26. The sponsor shall take all necessary and reasonable steps under 49 CFR Parts 23 and 26 to ensure nondiscrimination in the award and administration of DOT -assisted contracts, and/or concession contracts. The sponsor's DBE and ACDBE programs, as required by 49 CFR Parts 26 and 23, and as approved by DOT, are incorporated by reference in this agreement. Implementation of these programs is a legal obligation and failure to carry out its terms shall be treated as a violation of this agreement. Upon notification to the sponsor of its failure to carry out its approved program, the Department may impose sanctions as provided for under Parts 26 and 23 and may, in appropriate cases, refer the matter for enforcement under 18 U.S.C. 1001 and/or the Program Fraud Civil Remedies Act of 1936 (31 U.S.C. 3801). 25. Acquisition Thresholds. The FAA deems equipment to mean tangible personal property having a useful life greater than one year and a per -unit acquisition cost equal to or greater than $5,000. Procurements by micro - purchase means the acquisition of goods or services for which the aggregate dollar amount does not exceed $10,000, unless authorized in accordance with 2 CFR § 200.320. Procurement by small purchase procedures means those relatively simple and informal procurement methods for securing goods or services that do not exceed the $250,000 threshold for simplified acquisitions. 23 Page 126 of 381 3-12-0023-039-2022 Current FAA Advisory Circulars Required for Use in AIP Funded and PFC Approved Projects View the most current Series 150 Advisory Circulars (ACs) for Airport Projects at http://www.faa.gov/airports/resources/advisory circulars and http://www.faa.gov/regulations policies/advisory circulars 24 Page 127 of 381 TO: PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: AGENDA REQUEST Board of County Commissioners JoAnn Riley, Property Acquisition Manager Property Acquisition Division 8.B.1. 2022-54581 CONSENT AGENDA - PROPERTY ACQUISITION DIVISION DATE: 2/1/2022 *ACTION ITEM - CONTRACT QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEM? No Contract for Sale and Purchase - Harmony Heights Stormwater Improvements - Alemu Real Estate Holding LLC - Parcel ID 1431-801-0074-000-5 and 1431-701-0074- 000-8 St. Lucie County has a plan to improve the untreated stormwater runoff from the Harmony Heights neighborhood. Untreated stormwater contains pollutants including nitrogen and phosphorous, suspended solids, fertilizers, pesticides and oils. These pollutants flow into the downstream waters and into the critically impaired Indian River Lagoon. St. Lucie County reached out to willing sellers with vacant parcels that could be used as stormwater ponds. Alemu Real Estate Holding LLC responded as a willing seller. The County presented a Contract for Sale and Purchase to Alemu Real Estate Holding LLC for $37,000.00, which is 100% of the appraised value of the parcels according to Callaway & Price, Inc. the County's independent appraiser. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funds are available under the One-time funding source account number 001009-3725-561000-370000. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the contract for sale and purchase from Alemu Real Estate Holding LLC, authorize the Chair to sign the contract, direct staff to proceed with the closing and record the warranty deed in the public records of St. Lucie County, Florida. COMMISSION ACTION: Page 128 of 381 RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures r Date: January 11, 2022 Jennifer Hill, Office of Management & Budget Director Date: January 11, 2022 James Lappert, Water Quality Division Director Date: January 12, 2022 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: January 13, 2022 Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator Page 129 of 381 Alemu Real Estate Holding LLC PARCEL ID—1431-801-0074-000-5 & PARCEL ID—1431-701-0074-000-8 CONTRACT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE FOR REAL PROPERTY THIS AGREEMENT made this _ day of _, 2022, between Alemu Real Estate Holding LLC., whose mailing address is PO Box 26491, Tamarac, Florida 33320, hereinafter referred to as SELLER and, ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida 34982, hereinafter referred to as PURCHASER, upon the terms and conditions set forth herein, Seller agrees to sell and Purchaser agrees to purchase a certain parcel or parcels of real property located in the County of St. Lucie, Florida, being more fully described as: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT "A" together with all improvements and personal property located thereon as may hereinafter be specifically described. 1. PURCHASE PRICE AND METHOD OF PAYMENT. The full purchase price is Thirty -Seven Thousand and 00/1�00, ($37,000.00), determined to be the total of the following: Real Property — Parcel ID 1431-801-0074-000-5 Real Property — Parcel ID 1431-701-0074-000-8 Improvements Other than Buildings (described in Exhibit "B", if any) Other (describe) 17 000.00 20 000.00 00 payable in Cash or Cashier's check at the time of closing; plus or minus credits, adjustments and prorations as of the date of closing. 2. EXPENSES. Purchaser shall pay for documentary stamps and recording fee on the Deed conveying the subject real property to Purchaser. Processing fees, if any, for obtaining a release, partial release or subordination agreement upon any existing mortgage shall be borne by Purchaser„ 3. TITLE. Purchaser shall obtain, at the Purchaser's expense, a commitment for title insurance from a title company of Purchaser's choice, certified to a date not earlier than the date hereof, showing good and marketable title thereto to be vested in the Seller, free and clear of all liens and encumbrances except those herein expressly set forth and those which shall be discharged by Seller at or before closing. Should Purchaser find on examination of said title commitment that Seller's title is not good and marketable, Purchaser shall notify Seller or his attorney in Page 130 of 381 writing specifying the defects and Seller agrees to use reasonable diligence to make same good and marketable and shall have a reasonable time therefor, but not to exceed 45 days from the date of said notification. If title shall not be made good and marketable within said time, all monies paid hereunder shall forthwith be repaid to Purchaser and thereupon this contract shall become null and void and the parties hereto released and relieved of all further rights, duties or obligations hereunder; or, at Purchaser's option and Purchaser's request, Seller shall deliver the title in its existing condition upon compliance by Purchaser with the terms of the contract, and in such event Seller shall be released and relieved from any duty and obligations to make such title good and marketable. 4. CONVEYANCE. Seller agrees to convey title to Purchaser by a good and sufficient statutory Warranty Deed, and if personal property is included, same shall be conveyed by proper Assignment or Bill of Sale, all real and personal property to be free and clear of all liens, judgments, and encumbrances except, taxes for the current year, and zoning ordinances. 5. LIENS. All certified liens or assessments and any pending liens for which work has been completed prior to the date of this contract, shall be paid by Seller, Seller shall make and deliver to Purchaser a Mechanic's No -Lien Affidavit as to realty and an Affidavit as to no liens or encumbrances of any personal property. 6. PRORATIONS. Taxes, rents, interest and other expenses or revenue of said property shall be prorated from the cash to close as of the date of closing. Credits and charges for the day of closing shall belong to and be borne by the Seller. 7. RISK OF LOSS. Seller assumes risk of any and all loss or damage prior to closing and the property shall be conveyed in the same condition as on the date of this contract, ordinary wear and tear accepted. 8. POSSESSION. Seller shall deliver possession to Purchaser at the closing. 9. BROKERS. Any and all real estate fees or commissions claimed due, pursuant to this transaction and/or conveyance shall be paid by the Seller. 10. CLOSING. The closing shall be on or before April 22, 2022, at which time all monies due to be paid hereunder and all instruments due to be made, executed, and delivered by the respective parties, each to the other, as herein provided, shall be paid and delivered, and the abstract shall become the property of the Purchaser, subject to possessory rights and mortgagees of record. z Page 131 of 381 11. PLACE OF CLOSING. Closing shall be held at the offices of a place chosen by Purchaser and Purchaser shall notify Seller in writing of same at least seven (7) days prior to closing. 12. ATTORNEY'S FEES. Either party failing to comply with the terms hereof will pay all expenses, including a reasonable attorney's fee, incurred by the other party because of that failure. 13. MISCELLANEOUS. Written provisions shall control all printed provisions in conflict therewith. This contract embodies the entire agreement of the parties and may not be altered or modified except by an instrument in writing signed by the party against whom the enforcement of any alterations or modifications is sought. 14. DEFAULT. If Seller fails to perform hereunder without fault of the Purchaser, all monies paid hereunder shall be returned to the Purchaser upon demand but Purchaser shall not thereby waive any right or remedy he may have because of such default of Seller. If Purchaser fails to perform hereunder without fault of Seller, all monies paid hereunder may be retained by Seller as liquidated damages which shall be in lieu of all other remedies allowed by law and this contract shall there upon terminate. 15. DEED RESTRICTIONS. Seller warrants that there are no deed restrictions which are coupled with a reverter or re-entry clause and that title is not based upon a tax deed, or if based upon a tax deed, that the title has been duly quieted by suit. 16. ASSIGNMENT. This contract is freely assignable by the Purchaser, but no such assignment is binding upon Seller until an executed copy thereof is delivered to the Seller. Upon such delivery, the assignor shall be relieved of all liabilities under this contract. 17. DISBURSEMENT OF PROCEEDS The Purchaser has elected to have the closing processed through the office of the Title Company issuing Title Insurance. The Title Company or Agent will accomplish disbursement so as to bring the transaction under Section 627.7841, Florida Statutes, to assure coverage of the period from the commitment to deed recording, provided delivery of the deed and payment of the purchase price occur in the same day at the same time. 18. RECISION. Page 132 of 381 Purchaser may rescind this contract if at the time of closing the Seiler is the subject of any insolvency, receivership or bankruptcy proceedings, or is deceased. 19. EXISTING MORTGAGES. Seller hereby warrants that existing mortgages are in good standing and Seller further agrees to keep them in good standing and to make all payments due thereunder; he shall either satisfy the mortgage or obtain a release of the subject property from the mortgage at or before closing. 20. REFUSAL OF SPOUSE. Failure or refusal of the wife or husband of any one of the Sellers to execute the deed or any other required documents, shall be deemed default of the Seller. 21. OFFER TO SELL. Seller and Purchaser recognize and agree that by signing this agreement first, the Seller is offering to sell the property described in Exhibit "A" to the Purchaser in accordance with the terms and conditions of this agreement. If Purchaser shall fail to approve this agreement within sixty (60) days after Seller signs this agreement, this offer shall be null and void. 22. SELLER'S REPRESENTATIONS. (a) Annexed hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "C" is a list of all leases, tenancies, and occupancies affecting the rent, expirations, and security deposit if any, with respect to each such tenancy or occupancy, which Seller warrants and represents is true and correct. There are no other leases, occupancies, or tenancies except as reflected in said Schedule, and none will be agreed to prior to closing without Purchaser's consent. True and correct copies of all said leases, if any, have been delivered to Purchaser, and Seller warrants there are no modifications thereof. Unless otherwise reflected on said Exhibit "C", alterations, installations, and other work required to be performed by the Seller under the provisions of any such lease, tenancy or occupancy have been or will, by the date of closing, be completed and fully paid for. No brokerage commission is now due and unpaid in connection with any lease, tenancy, or occupancy or any renewal thereof, nor with any other matter pertaining to the subject property and upon the closing date no such commission shall be due and unpaid. (b) Neither Seller nor the respective tenants nor parties to any of the agreements listed in Exhibits "C" or "D" attached hereto are in default under the terms of said Agreement of instrument. (c) Seller has not entered into any contracts, subcontracts, licenses, concessions, easements, or other agreements, service arrangements, either recorded or unrecorded, written or oral, affecting the property other than those set forth in Exhibit "D" attached hereto made a part thereof. Each and every such contract or other instrument listed in Exhibit "D" is a valid, bona fide, and binding agreement entered into by the parties hereof, effected in good faith in an arms -length transaction. True and correct copies of said instruments have been delivered to the Purchaser, and the Seller represents that there are not now and will not be at the date of closing, amendments or modifications or any waiver by any party of any of the provisions thereof. Page 133 of 381 (d) None of the tenants on the premises have been given any concession or consideration for the rental of any space applying to any period after the closing; and no tenants are entitled to any concessions, rebates, allowances or free rent for any period after the closing hereunder. (e) Seller warrants and represents that no other agreements concerning employees engaged in the operation and maintenance of the subject property or employment contracts exist, except as set forth in Exhibit "E" attached hereto, copies of which agreements have been delivered to the Purchaser. (f) Annexed hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "F" is a list of all policies of insurance now in full force and effect with respect to the property giving the company, amount and type of insurance, policy expiration date, premium and other relevant information delivered to Purchaser true and accurate copies of all said policies and the premium shall be prorated as of the date of closing. (g) Seller agrees with Purchaser that from and after the date hereof and prior to closing, Seller will not enter into any lease or agreement or any modification of any existing lease of agreement pertaining to the subject property without the written consent of Purchaser. (h) All of Seller's representations and warranties set forth in this Contract shall be true as of and surviving the closing, and all obligations of Seller involving action or performance by Seller prior to closing shall have been fully complied with. in the event that a lien, claim or cause of action should arise, resulting from the activities upon the property prior to closing or from any misrepresentations concerning the property contained herein, Seller shall at its sole cost and expense defend against such claim or cause of action, and hold Purchaser harmless therefrom, which shall include, but not be limited to, Seller's retaining such attorneys or other persons as may be required to fulfill this indemnification. (i) Neither the whole nor any part of the subject property is now, and at the closing will be, in violation of any code, ordinance, statute, or regulation pertaining thereto and Seller has received no notice of any such violation. Seller shall deliver to Purchaser any such notice received prior to or after closing. If any of the representations of Seller contained in this paragraph are inaccurate at the present time or as of the date of closing, Purchaser may elect not to close this transaction in which event all parties shall be relieved from all obligations and liabilities hereunder; provided however, that nothing contained herein shall preclude Purchaser from seeking specific performance of Seller's obligations hereunder so as to rectify any misrepresentation made by Seller herein. 23. COMPLIANCE WITH ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS. In the event that, between the effective date of this Contract and the closing of the transaction contemplated herein, environmental contamination of the Property has resulted or is discovered, the Purchaser, at its sole option, may elect to terminate this Contract without Page 134 of 381 further liability. Should the Purchaser elect not to terminate this Contract, Purchaser shall be entitled to an appropriate adjustment in the purchase price based upon the estimated cost of clean-up of the environmental contamination. In the event that environmental contamination is discovered after closing, Seller shall remain obligated, with such obligation to survive delivery of the deed and possession, to diligently pursue and accomplish the clean-up of any environmental contamination where the event(s) alleged to have caused the contamination occurred prior to closing in a manner consistent with all applicable laws, rules, regulations and ordinances and at Seller's sole cost and expense. In addition, Seller represents that the ground water in Sellers cone of influence is not contaminated. Seller shall indemnify and save harmless and defend Purchaser, its officers, servants, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, damages, liabilities, expenditures or causes of action of whatsoever kind arising from the environmental contamination. Seller shall defend, at its sole cost and expense, any legal action, claim or proceeding instituted by any person against the Purchaser as a result of any claim, suit, or cause of action for injuries to body, life, limb or property for which the environmental contamination is alleged to be a contributing legal cause. Seller shall save the Purchaser harmless from and against all judgments, orders, decrees, attorney fees, costs, expenses and liabilities in and about any such claim, suit, investigation or defense thereof, which may be entered, incurred or assessed as a result of the foregoing. 24. CONFLICT OF LAWS. The parties hereto hereby agree that all legal rights, duties, obligations and defenses shall be determined pursuant to the Laws of the State of Florida. The covenants herein shall bind and the benefits and advantages shall inure to the respective heirs, executors, administrators and successors or the parties hereto. Whenever used, the singular shall include the plural, and the plural the singular and the use of any gender shall include all genders. [REMAINDER OF THE PAGE LEFT BLANK] 6 Page 135 of 381 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have hereunto affixed their hands and seals. EXECUTED by SELLER this _!_�day of 2022, WITNESS: Print Name:�9,►r?/ W ITN ESS: 1 Print Name:�4s3C'_�� STATE OF COUNTY OF Alemu Real Estate Holding LLC Print: -5 C7, 61 �L ✓� L C=' f'e� 1 Title _ is % D The foregoing instrumen was knowledged before by means of �ysical presence or [ ] online notarization, this / (date)by `' = 7 (name of member, officer or agent) of Ale u Real Estate Holdin LLC a _ �ZGrZL/G>c,� (State of incorporation) limited liabili company, on behalf of the company, who is personally known to me or who has produced!' "'key (type ' ( yp • fidentification) as i"tification. [Notary Seal] r�'F ^ No Signature :=oti�YP9il, LEMACORDELIALAMEY / RZNotary Public •State of Floridas` Commission n HH 192200�' 'N.oF � ` MY Comm. Expires Oct 28, 2025 / Bonded through National Notary Assn. Name Printed Page 136 of 381 ATTEST: EXECUTED by PURCHASER this day of 2022. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPUTY CLERK By: CHAIR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS COUNTY ATTORNEY [REMAINDER OF THE PAGE LEFT BLANK] Page 137 of 381 EXHIBIT "A" LEGAL DESCRIPTION Parcel ID: 1431-801-0074-000-5 HARMONY HEIGHTS NO 4 BLK 8 LOT 10 m Parcel ID: 1431-701-0074-000-8 HARMONY HEIGHTS ADDN BLK F LOT 12 Page 138 of 381 EXHIBIT "B" IMPROVEMENTS OTHER THAN BUILDINGS io Page 139 of 381 EXHIBIT "C" SCHEDULE OF LEASES, TENANCIES AND OCCUPANCIES Page 140 of 381 EXHIBIT "D" CONTRACTS, LICENSES AND AGREEMENTS Page 141 of 381 EXHIBIT "E" OPERATION, MAINTENANCE AND EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENTS Page 142 of 381 EXHIBIT "F" POLICIES OF INSURANCE S:\ACQ\WP\Harmony Heights\Harmony Heights Phase 3 - 2021\Alemu Real Estate Holding LLC\Contract for Sale and Purchase Both Parcels - Alemu Real Estate Holding LLC.docx 14 Page 143 of 381 Saint Lucie County Property Appraiser January 10, 2022 1:4,514 187.5 375 750 ft 55 110 220 m Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Page 144 of 381 Saint Lucie County Property Appraiser January 10, 2022 1:4,514 187.5 375 750 ft 55 110 220 m Sources: Esri, HERE, Garmin, USGS, Intermap, INCREMENT P, NRCan, Esri Japan, METI, Esri China (Hong Kong), Esri Korea, Esri (Thailand), NGCC, (c) OpenStreetMap contributors, and the GIS User Community Page 145 of 381 TO: PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: AGENDA REQUEST Board of County Commissioners Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney County Attorney Harbor Town Marina Dredging Agreement 8.B.2. 2022-54632 CONSENT AGENDA - COUNTY ATTORNEY DATE: 2/1/2022 *ACTION ITEM - AGREEMENT QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEM? No Harbor Town Marina is interested in partnering with St. Lucie County to accomplish dredging of a portion of Taylor Creek. The County has permits for dredging all segments of Taylor Creek, including the areas adjacent to the Harbor Town Marina. Harbor Town would like to use the County's permits to accomplish dredging adjacent to their existing docks located on Taylor Creek. Drediging by Harbor Town will benefit the County because removal of the muck sediments from the Creek is the primary goal of the Taylor Creek Dredging Project. The County does not have plans to dredge the area proposed to be dredged by Harbor Town. The dredging proposed by Harbor Town will allow the Marina to accommodate larger vessels at their outer docks located on Taylor Creek. The County will require Harbor Town to sign a hold harmless agreement to be able to use the County permits to accomplish their dredging. Harbor Town will be responsible for amending the County permit and coordinating with the regulatory agencies. Disposal of the muck sediments will be at the County's Dredge Material Management Area and will be the responsibility of Harbor Town. The County will require Harbor Town to retain a professional engineer to certify that the material placed in the Dredge Material Management Area meets the intent of the County's permits. The attached agreement between Harbor Town Marina and St. Lucie County provides for a clear understanding of the agreed upon conditions to allow Harbor Town to use the County Permits. PREVIOUS ACTION: July 2004 - the County dredged the Taylor Creek Navigation Channel adjacent to Harbor Town Marina. December 2014 - the County entered into an agreement allowing Harbor Town Marina to use the County's Taylor Creek dredging permits June 2020 - the County entered into an Amended and Restated Agreement with Harbor Town Marina. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Page 146 of 381 N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval of the attached agreement with Harbor Town Marina to allow for use of the Taylor Creek Dredging permits; and authorization for the Chair to sign documents as approved by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures Date: January 19, 2022 Don West, Public Works Director i� 4 Date: January 19, 2022 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: January 19, 2022 Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator Page 147 of 381 AGREEMENT ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND SAFE HARBOR - HARBORTOWN MARINA DISPOSAL OF DREDGE MATERIAL AT ST. LUCIE COUNTY'S DREDGE MATERIAL MANAGEMENT AREA THIS AGREEMENT dated this /3 day of S-AwuLar 2022, (the "Effective Date") by and between SHM HARBORTOWN, LLC, hereinafter re erred to as the "Harbortown", and ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "County." WHEREAS, the County and Harbortown initially entered into an agreement voted favorably by the St. Lucie County Commission on June 16, 2020 pertaining to dredging; and WHEREAS, the County has permits for dredging all segments of Taylor Creek, including the areas in the adjacent Harbortown Marina; and, WHEREAS, dredging by Harbortown will benefit the County, because removal of the muck sediments from Taylor Creek is the primary goal of the County's Taylor Creek Dredging project; and WHEREAS, the dredging proposed by Harbortown will allow the Marina to accommodate larger vessels at their outer docks located on Taylor Creek; and WHEREAS, to implement a maintenance dredging plan in future years, it will be critical for Harbortown to have access and utilization of the County's Dredge Material Management Area; and WHEREAS, the parties desire to cooperate and enter into this Agreement to accomplish the purposes set forth above. WITNESSETH: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises, representations, obligations, covenants and conditions set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereby agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The above stated recitals are true and correct and are incorporated herein by reference. 2. Permits. At its sole cost and expense, Harbortown will be responsible for applying to other applicable regulatory agencies for permission necessary to accomplish the dredging work. S:\ATTY\AGREEMENT\SHM Harbortown, LLC - 22 - Disposal of Dredge Material Page 148 of 381 3. Dredging, Muck Removal. Harbortown agrees to perform or contract to perform the dredging of its docks at its sole cost and expense, Harbortown covenants to perform the dredging in compliance with all permit conditions. For a period of three (3) years from the Effective Date, the County agrees Harbortown may dispose of the muck sediment removed as the result of the dredging to the County's Dredge Material Management Area, and Harbortown agrees to be responsible for the proper disposal of such muck sediment at the County's Dredge Material Management Area. 4. Construction Management Services. The County desires that the County's Engineering Department approve the disposal of the Harbortown dredge material at the County's Dredge Material Management Area. In this regard, Harbortown shall retain the services of a duly licensed professional engineer to certify that the material placed at the Dredge Material Management Area meets the intent of all regulatory permits. 5. Indemnification: Hold Harmless; Insurance. In consideration of the County's agreement to allow Harbortown use of its Dredge Material Management Area, Harbortown agrees to indemnify and hold the County harmless from any liability that may result from the disposal of material from the dredging project. Harbortown agrees to require its contractor to procure workers compensation insurance coverage as mandated by Florida law and general liability insurance coverage in the amount of $1,000,000.00 per person, $2,000,000.00 per claim and name the County as an additional named insured on the insurance policies. 6. Complete Agreement. The County and Harbortown agree that this Agreement constitutes and contains the entire agreement between the parties hereto as it pertains to the subject matter addressed herein and shall supersede and take precedence over any and all prior and contemporaneous negotiations, agreements and understandings, proposed or otherwise, whether written or oral, between the parties hereto. No modification, amendment, supplement to or waiver of this Agreement or any of its provisions shall be binding upon the Parties hereto unless made in writing and duly authorized and executed by all Parties. 7. Binding Effect. All of the terms and provisions of this Agreement shall be binding upon, inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by the parties and their respective administrators, executors, legal representatives, heirs, successors and permitted assigns, whether so expressed or not. 8. No Third Parties Beneficiaries. Unless expressly stated herein to the contrary, nothing in this Agreement, whether express or implied, is intended to confer any rights or remedies under or by reason of this Agreement on any person other than the parties hereto and their respective administrators, executors, other legal representatives, heirs, successors and permitted assigns. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to relieve or discharge the obligation or liability of any third persons to any party to this Agreement, nor shall any provision give any third persons any right of subrogation or action over or against any party to this Agreement. 2 S:\ATTY\AGREEMENT\SHM Harbortown, LLC - 22 - Disposal of Dredge Material Page 149 of 381 9. Severability. If any provision of this Agreement may be construed in two or more ways, one of which would render the provision invalid or otherwise voidable or unenforceable and another of which would render the provision valid and enforceable, such provision shall have the meaning, which renders it valid and enforceable. If any provision hereunder shall be held unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, then the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall continue in full force and effect without being impaired in anyway. 10. Amendments. The provisions of this Agreement may not be amended, supplemented, waived or changed, other than by a writing signed by the party against whom enforcement of any such amendment, supplement, waiver or change is sought and making specific reference to this Agreement. 11. Notices. All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing (including communication) and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier services, telecommunicated, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid), return receipt requested, addressed to: As to the County: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 As to SHIM HARBORTOWN, LLC: 14784 Preston Road, Suite 975 Dallas, TX 75254 With a copy to: St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 With a copy to: Harbortown Marina — Fort Pierce 1936 Harbortown Drive Fort Pierce, FL 34946 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County and Harbortown, each acting under due and proper authority, have caused this Agreement to be executed pursuant to authorization by their respective governing legislative bodies and on behalf of their successors and assigns, effective on the date the last party signs this Agreement. 3 S:\ATTY\AGREEMENT\SHM Harbortown, LLC - 22 - Disposal of Dredge Material Page 150 of 381 ACCEPTANCE BY THE COUNTY: ATTEST: DEPUTY CLERK ACCEPTANCE BY SHM HARBORTOWN, LLC: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGAL CORRECTNESS BY: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESS: SHM HARBORTOWN, LLC i BY: �- Please print name and title 4 S:\ATfY\AGREEMENT\SHM Harbortown, LLC - 22 - Disposal of Dredge Material Page 151 of 381 TO: PRESENTED BY SUBMITTED BY: CIIRIFr7r- BACKGROUND: AGENDA REQUEST Board of County Commissioners Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney County Attorney 8.B.3. 2022-54634 CONSENT AGENDA - COUNTY ATTORNEY DATE: 2/1/2022 *ACTION ITEM - BOARD APPROVAL QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEM? No Proof of Publication and Certified Minutes of Notice of Change to County Commission District Boundaries State law requires that an accurate description of the changed boundaries of the County Commission districts be published once a week for two consecutive weeks. State law also requires that proof of the two publications be entered in the minutes of the Board. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve including the proof of publications in the board minutes. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures Page 152 of 381 Date: January 20, 2022 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: January 24, 2022 Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator Page 153 of 381 Timestamp Street 1/4/2022 8:04:23 2300 Virginia AVE Final Publication Date City 1/13/2022 Fort Pierce Ad Number State GC10802808 FL Publication ZIP Code St. Lucie News Tribune 34982-5632 Market Your Name Treasure Coast Jennifer DeWitt Delivery Method Email Address Both jldewitt@gannett.com Number of Affidavits Needed 1 Customer Email bishopc@stiucieco.org Customer Name St Lucie County Attorneys Office Customer Phone Number (772) 462-1492 Customer Address 2300 Virginia AVE Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5632 Account Number (If Known) 437762 Name Carol Bishop Page 154 of 381 Treasure Coast Newspapers PARTOF THE USA TODAY NETWORK St. Lucie News -Tribune 1939 SE Federal Highway, Stuart, FL 34994 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ST LUCIE COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFFICE 2300 VIRGINIA AVE FORT PIERCE, FL 34982 ATTN CAROL BISHOP STATE OF WISCONSIN COUNTY OF BROWN Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, said legal clerk, who on oath says that he is a legal clerk Manager of the St. Lucie News -Tribune, a daily newspaper published at Fort Pierce in St. Lucie County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was published in the St. Lucie News - Tribune in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said St Lucie News -Tribune is a newspaper published in Fort Pierce, in said St. Lucie County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said St. Lucie County, Florida, daily and distributed in St. Lucie County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement ; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The St. Lucie News - Tribune has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. 1/612022; 1/13/2022 Subscribed and sworn to before on the 13"' of January, 2022 Notary. State of WX❑unty rown My commissio ex res: NANCY HEYRMAN Publication Cost: $2,520.00 Notary Public Ad No: GC10802808 Slat6 of Wisconsin Customer No: 437762 PO#: PUBLIC NOTICE Page 155 of 381 COMMISSION DISTRICT BOUNDARIES NA, 11, MET IC-- Gw CmmmlWAlr. mI-1 pl AWugmmn.lo Ule wr.Tl eonry TYmmluim nwTw BUWrb A4__ AA ar Gwmry AN, IUP rerai.: drpm Nu IrmrAN mw <mu14 e• IaA d M1N la mn I In N llm Idbwlnp rspl Is a GGrnry Wmmmm Nnwm Amm M1ratr.r to WCI, reprdnp Re ae0wl. YYnGOULD OF COUR OF mbl.m GREAPSIGAOR sl LW WLNI NETIN61 W O.Y. CmenN. A WW1 c.mn.E A. am Admm.a II:Rar u ], Can-umn I A".11-IJlr.cn Umrsll W Onm.nYOs -,rawer llMB.rr Oln [.]FermudulL.urybxmleXOM�mS 0. %WIp INKUN.sCE A. A90CC hdsVkwW ce 1L] N. Oyullr fw-n bmi.0 Jw -11 z-,',I'.Po I IIrm£ .rI Ir Int mlr INm,nN II..,d, ¢xn',N m FNw Ne T.pxrr ICE Ifi Ir.la d l'e Cau.. me reb.lc N.ml mhn xu N pomYEen T e mps hrans.1 C I W Y R_`U` •u IrcreuW h mar. l.I W OD peW4 s rce Ne AIO fEn.a-mul(A I.SWNNm'mm Ile AN Cra.. h.. ]e91. up III ))I IA9 r.spm� mmw N m 1N IT1 in 1J1G. En�JI Ire Town. papK:hn mvIITW N 6 S% Th Han0 m.p una milb Pm.puer.Ilcm mU NYNuIrn Lo m•wW Re n.els;® ne F¢Y0.11 e1d0rra TAn Yn 012 x11 In Vd ne.Alp M b.r. Atl A �eMNNmnrt [WaM me nu-YT d A¢ul 1p EHe Im1e I]I.Y.dW'a Ue Wem. rum .I OH. a aFen Amu 1 W Ne plNd[ m ue a Lpumwy„aI..bN..nu m— to euA—-.1 uAbenu-MUTAMIN Nd 1 pr d EM _F Wend. C'.-•AA I-e ] G' r<Suxrng pmum pAY[ m.Mmr Ad 4_INS-A Nu1Um.m YI+S W Ih rm<cammmcn dsrw 9 Lwe arry Sdmo¢r1 OWxd Au I'. Mr.'I daNd. m � InI r �C Gm,ry w^mNOIMm En ro pW em .rn In mIW b•p m-pnA In Wen <V I<d d W d. MCNmN We MW ¢mmum Nq Ibrr.rr [movml rr1Ji parry wH Fu N.mA me Arm n Saw P.It bATHV N Y eN•Y NANrLrra AOD W MTrWAA1 aYWfi re/SV YNi ^rwmA h Ue w l.d mrrrllY r ..... ...... .-_...-....'. EIaWr�da.11ppV II n•dmdWmNWE rer FIEVm.I'WwE wr s¢c-a4+ffsaeAn Latkwh.0 AIM i4 [.IaIIrNY VM wd.rr0.w ATNIN NE EmYI I1M ry •nrr Mill i. m1eF•1'rl.l.wr In EWME.NAYY W a >@I EmOEQYSE1s RFslAis MPCpuYEm- 1@Opgda0mmII0R6 •)eM 1- W ))A •).h11-WRY xni nw PopdABon •]cM •]Nhl •)shE 55 SSt TN pepuYElan Mrpe.Inum dsHn I¢npnu,4.A aAore ud ApIN, Uu T.M 1T.bW mA pppuhlhn Ir Gvn�l aamClrup ns.:p, mRu IN, ". NOUN, MOIn Alma Oremwr)1011..NNwnee IC mnnJ.lk HANAmOeNmNm IA x]I, mEM mWe AAA. b Wmem san IMpmmnd.t INS 6e. p d><Iw u. me• I]I rnstG W re..,m w mt nmefly mlb,e�a 1b H. WYe.A �rdn.m NNd e<mrvTYA TI WRm<N M n< GdNrn nwndY m In Ar- Cnll Na:nNlp[cr IA<YAXW lw pudLmmm�l.l W<:m. 1b IplOwnp pWpb A:bn.W h Bap I-. ImrE a me puAi Mnp ib Bpwl Nm F6mIp11.nI.X[ mmWisR and AP --FAR-,, np IT d d.Xrrsnmewleta Anwp I Pa.a 11 M. I'I n Eµc NEAR AAIpL dA1WdW0TRRB.zaO�IE.N w- Crr csmC3AI:dr E.o AICN 1.+N.Na cAllsN.r..s EmL yr--- A.IW ...I - nano ANN I.W OFu+m.pN"ml It- e.11a'eFmIEN COML H)AEm.NT RON AT ME WERSEt1104 or THE MIT LINE O" SECnW 9 TRMI9TR lY SOUTH NNLI FW 0..ARA0 K NYI LN) ON ANO W USE: I-11 A HFR.Y N0161I1 LOHEEL" E OF AD FCC ONLMV] TO A FOUNT GA PRROAVJION OF SO IN H IWOANI A%[ R PARCEL UNIFICATION WMBER 24-1UOd-GOO-6 ALSO PFCORROIN R-HANK IECOiR BOOR 111fil PACE 1B1] Rw]CHECORTS OF SOLACIL COGAIY. FLONOA. TIIOECI MST ALONG AP AOUG1 MTHAGARY RAT TO Tlf MST BOW 0AM UNC PARCO KW 9RVG THE r!v EWES R FRN pfP]E TxENGL x07- HERD SVJ WFS-GCON URN To THE IOIII_CGRTEfi Rwo M;CA TIEUI fE: IN,EEyC.ryyAygElNl SWM�i WJNANrNDEAfONN f4R1CR Y�ESI®. EMkS E\O IAVIE IHI1R M51 KOYc ME [ENiFAJNE OF SONN 1AN5 f W Oif. 10INE Il0 AJIE OF CENIERAURSAWYITMVOIWF. MENR XCRIIM1YF.lI IS-HERATENWE R 54D SANNMK P]D O#S A PRAT R WTFRRCTIOTT VTn T-F LEVTERUNE 01 NAN ALL WE TIENCE MST MO SOUT"sr HECK THE fEN'TFRHIf OFA)SUINFE 1AIETOIPF INRRECRGAINT-HGH NONE W. PMR THENCEMSIERY _ A IS IF RSV01 INF PH IS EOCL.` I O74FINTIWfRUSITON HEME - CENTER RF OF ISI—10TNLott OFWION.' OF I ME KORNxIN `OFF wY KtIRw,N R6tn -raimSf ALGAL THE CMIM.B4E R E)Mi0I .0 rN RAY R. NRr NAOr. mild 6w.Sv FnIE .p,EEIMI V= L'.'n W,g0.Cd tq%INEI r.W IE n1L:RI LY1.s NIIIAI WENC IAEAEBWi11D1'IW N.IxI[HSECTIOx W111 :R'YN)5 RORO IC R61II IHEN[t M51 KCN6 AD TOM -LE\6ALVE R '--I" - ROAD I[ R 611 BI T-E\[n WOM K046 ME LENTE:JNE CN AD SE- - TO Trt WEIISFCRGA Mlix FEC S-OR FNL;MG (A-.-.) THENCE SO-STERY KING MR FEF RAERCAO 10 THE ME CENIERJ.VE Or HONDA TIRIII.: "PENCE AGION=JSiERY KCAND RRTl „-.INN 10 IT N' 1r. or, RNIRM OF GAMS CUT RT HAD II RTUW 1-f1[: SMHMSTE;Y KGA. AD CEITFRAC OF tlA]ES CN CEr HOAR TO TIE IORIIWT -6WD OF WOIx RONOA WATER VNr4CE10 , 121 TVEI E AOTIrSFERY A.ONc AD Ih UNSTORY p>RO-R-WD R RNA OIA O THE O'EI@rl Or, MR CFN"EILA: OF YnV ROAR ICRATA THENCE NG:GI 4OV6 AT RATER IC FPOTO"R SITE-ONWIIII ROTH LRF R CRI01NE TOWNIE SS SJO-1 MI6E 59 :AST TI ONCE ARTS ACXO SO.'M •JYE OF AD 90101 ER OF SAD S."cA SO I -FILE NOI"n KOx6 MS" U4: OR SAO R.Y YCnbK AD 1A0 ) MO E TON FAST TO THE SOUTH -LdEH WIK-Mk\Ckfll N61'L SO OFWAv UN: OF .W'l1BiCEl •GxFR fM'A 10 - WIN- RICERS. O=RONW MnRIC IHEXIF AORTMYSTERU KONG CE TFR_WE OF FrONOA M-1gNF i0 INE W ON N11I WVNWaX 41.1MA LANE R IILC{. (FVI. DIIWCI fJdE"am NEAR. WIN ulE1- w e•.C1i<JErE TO I H' 1N'IAG 0,0IWIhQAIRm EI LYC•.NN 17' 1111, 11 WOn CEA'FRILHr �R1w. ON AP HURAGH R EN I.ILHAA.r i0 TxENFRSK"ION IF_W]NO'CAL, W"Y POA06tq THNIR FAST _ "T-E-ERIFOr-w0W0 ROAD TCMF WIFHEEITEM WNn..IN1.R 5 `IRrWAT 1 TRENCI W: R. 7:RLY A:OW TER: CENTER -JAR R SAN U E NRM'p' "0 1111 N IPENR EATERY 1CA'6 1EN6R1\E IF AD rAUiIWA, D 10 TO III LREFOPEC, M H M,MG N IWN\ MR IrGrEt TSW 1G O'-I: EGOF \0.RNR N 701-E INF115ERI_H-11.7.111 OriWNW VIN_ PH,WA LBUNAEeE'NNRrriYRu.WNV n ,, V,.M.A ERN TOWN WO- ICI ••v-N^.y •]Y a HIM 4w N,f. "" YNTGGEW u1 RYA me.11-r6a-11NEH Llu maGAr R 1E 1IL GRAN 1R a:N 10A 10 IF OVT,TrL SIRE IlIr O HIC SPROK-RI KOW AT JAf TO A PRIT 01 InCM7. ]ND LU Y AID VAN II I— I— PEST KO\fi" CIE", IRA PRIT R NIGANGIR TO THEN IN-LllA-PN0 R W_MC 3CW -AD "�NDI ASJI SAID LR\t IGgM 0; T{ w1711 COTAIV III AND SGNx OF :CEV EER I S 011 AfLr U.:V PSA SI JA)E IN -'I' LLW.O[kRERIN4IEESIYCI 4-EW.IAMW*WM NENW AiD.lLL 3:i I A" ME O-'N S:UM LM c- S:IOGN S IONS-P 11--1 -1:F x• Aµ•HELL •l 4NlRWI b --iR •EaNID At A.:CBnI"aW Wvi rMEBp] WIAEILO •MKEdV•01 E'i i 41 T [M1 F+A f1 s0.Ir E)IwJIa qNR fl.I-PO .RAINY nI:iE TAIWJ IWO - .-E COAP AND 1N 1 COUREY TO TIE SGNNI.T IL _ R Ir DE : D, I "AN ]) 50."M •ICE W I- IH SRDx _s16 ]I S)]fnrFANG:IW U5GK50oUNG n nlS: AN Tu AVB 1A1[aa.TBA INNT \MI NO -FSs 15=. RANG W: wSl\CORNER R YCI 36 TIWr6TM ]) SOUM, \rt CEIRI1rk OF 195 C R A "o THE WTDTSICTIGI 1 +CFA'A INE O""sW".MS1NU TEH AJWIOMI GAR[ gIIH-AIM.IW,Y SEE•�Y-lr>RAAEIIA'�."nE4lNIYR�EV1 pI IcDm 1] f nllnmil,*%:AaIlw EWIMAEWMR_1 vpI MGIWeAMr ]mEG STyEl EICE-'Al�stlx MINtt'QM WINDRFA WR+sl.prRlw VASEpEG ST-E[F 'PENCE NORTMAO\4--F LMTEJ\- O-AIDS-Ms' VA4RE' S[HRT 111E IN'•{I;pPININ �rNNI¢- �. `.: NRIE %>s..lx rm E..AA >n1*'�I f.'RWlNv :NHT01HMIltECIGNIN-pinrq-4. ANNWC,EIwN.' Sr{NCE4nn Y=f3'N Rybl RI O!RV:Elk'iWMrdWRMEfWMi T" 1•AR' AN OF MT.wI AWN4tl�•fr•KWW'Hm' yWArml FPAINEZN.N,AN ^1L'.!a.•MP I�EI FIRVICIYS',Mry v..niij.E.1ni'.IWI'iVA:NI --INLN'Ln.WI N L.IB OYNw rL Ir•.WW'p RE xEl1=�I W'xaNln]IA TO •NRLEEI VIIM iI'IICµ A.RWEEy Tmli w A"a ILL WlrrkA E ySagt[VS.11l prN; WPEa•ENN'RL.pC Ejtu,Iwu:N r•INTC�EIHMNIWNT '-LSf�'fAENi IRui iND`N 1p I FWD ApyEA,+11A I.RNLrY lAR•AN R W i'dAV 1: • f0•IY.r tIi Rl fia'[6y P IWNLIWI y.EAAr EB;XS A�kE ;• NL EASIER• A _I:: R [ErOkRIII 0- s.VO s0U-U51 IEFW NLWE v0 O'M RING XROH A ONS THE GN GMANG T0!Nk�CEA eR.T6 or yNORAAI �AG_ --A-G _ _ 50.r1EA5i WN1W-w -- - - If lS c4rK.G THE I -SIN. [15V_rICIW ,CALF 01�-I eGx �]lOx\w. YCEW:SKGAGIN L[I1FNW[ R EONHK',.:75 IUCIBUI]LGWA)IS R SIC IO i"II nRINFITSFCOGA NTxcGUIxMS1 RLRC2 ANNGMEXII ARTITWST 111 ME R A) soul -MS" R PD ERIV'I R RIW'w Wp MMEI BLOCS I]I>\0 1. " vAGI SS IN ECORSR51 U]ELO�.X RININ T,11'CFSOONIMESExLY M'? 1.EM- OERI U6 [ENIERwEOF ISTR-)%UF•NTOME Wf:S .1111-1101 51 LKF0-4N fYAvITRAC[MSTE 1, pu,l1tl TION N OVGI.FRITFR RfR1 WN1MY51 4CIIRWA 5C �,?WN)101��[ I1T[-SL:FION 1•G- RN[ilxT Or L:06TO.Yv :AgIYMv, O 10]H INS ER IRCHwlfPENTERJNE R WRIIEASI SARI-EI "NICE SRNxA OGACRSWfy �IFMF R YCIIGA 1411RVI.wp Sir ARC_ HCAO ILRYINO G SOU111 LIC 4T LD SLOUCH 16ANOKGAI 1111E OF OCEAN WNER WAERWW AS RCO.. W PAI Bch( II OARS LAE "0 THE SROCRwERSV R ) PPDF[MR LxEN[E kONfx RLGN6NfA51 EOWRM RAH 0= SAP RINORA7 EM TO ME INTERSEGIION ARM ANARIAGAIN8DEAPASARGETHEENCE URE1111-I SHE tO1T W1AE OF T-E FAST BOW 0 WE GO AP SA NAREA CLUE BOLLPY.� TO ME MAT EOUNOART 111E OF SE. LICIE W41E .,-I AS rGWO O IN -1 WGA I vKL 35 OF 11. LURE - RELIC Rf0R65IN SF[IIONMTONASxIPR WNH MA4CE r0 FA51:THEMCE WNNKRTGSAD.WE TO THE HOUR OCINIONCI LIE OF F0D 51 ROE INOIS RVL PAR( UIl I, SST KY. AS LVDID IN P.AI WOX n PAC 6 ON FE. METE C"" PURD .'I -NO ME -'I LIIE Or 5[CRGA 26 TDAWC Np INSOM1 TRANCE 10 FAST. THEIIL EA7 Ar." SWAN NE pN\RIP ]6 SW I-. PAIN W ., AID SON, LIM OF SEC_ W 1 CMTSIi Y)SOEIM)HMR 41 HAS 0 ME SELM D.MRRR COINED OF A) SECTION D; TrEV[E IGRRT AGAG FAST LEM UTSWIM1MSI 0 lFR OF SNO4RWI W i0 ixE tplfA OF AD SLROH 1EN[E FASI ALRI6XRRN UHE RiXE-HA510N MICASECTIT W IO ME LN10UNifERt0i\FA GE SNO SFCRGA W:IHFXR SOUIIIKW 6WFS1 W IRWYI MEN R HEEINAVYSI9 WASRCRD:OWPRATBOOKI,PARMOFSl.LE CWNIY RBLICMCM RORDATCTHESWIHIM AGAlY LINER 011 OFENOSLWONSEERT]ENCE FAST ALONG THE bOURRFTE LNF V LOT 1 R SAII CWRRXI. 10 THE M51EWr RRR-R- VrRrLR1O1 EMT COAST PIkflOq. THENCE SOUR XASTJEY ALON65ID ROR-M-PEAT TO NHL SOAUT11W Ccx110IOFLR1RSADIENNM3ST.MON WTIENCEMIMMGMIN_E RO.GA6AII0V 0- SENIN BOW¢VR NIE R LOI) R S'AD YFERWN S SUBRv90N SOME ICRG CT41W1fNRNEPllVf TCLWOIFMICGAS TOTIWLRRD:CE HCEFE1KGAG RNI- OF SAD RONOAEA G MST ALONG I H TO TIE IJR1 OF SUG WILE -GI SINXFA51WKIGAPWO,"HEIR MSTKOVGIPE CENFRNER WIIMFASIVNLTH ROAD 10 TIE W GINE DFN D SC CENERIIC R S ARE POT RAID EANI; THENCE NNX .C. THEE OTEIGRSAOStlRNM1R STAEXETOMf WTN6FLIDNYAIE CENERAEOF MTLAG 1FMN MSVUL TO FEE MST AND SOIIIIMFSI niI NONE THE SOUTHEAST AL R NHE REGION TOIML RXIERINE RUSIIDMMlROOM 5R1ElE iNWC s.Ao us 1EG1Avp' I IanR PRN Gr BLEENTxc DEC ... III - Af]LVRSV IS. ST.IGHLCWIRSL UG u61E ®mNE111iTM • N WN�Ff MM><ealallMp BEEN A THE CEDERRE NTURCIAW RI SS AND GIN IAOiS10NN PARYYLAY. THFIIR LEST KC16 THE CENT9WAE OF SW. CRUSITCANA RV4CNN 10 A NZON THE tDlhWllE OF lOxOA'S"R0.1PWE O EA RCANU O REAGNTUR\RIEC THENCE XIXRH KGAGIHE CENIERAE R 10-T1EWRNE IOTRE AFTEREFCnOHMTM A PRN'10\TNE ECATIT.WE R YCIIGN II TO T E10R TIE SOUTH LANE OF SERpVCE 6EIROIW151V ]6 NIGERN90E AO W. IIfNNCF .I NONE SOUGHT UME OF SAD 4LT. 16 AIO NONE IRONGY BW1ON[W THE OF FGM SNi" LOCE SEG UP TWINY SET SIDRIRINT AS RECORDED IN NoT WON 14, PACE 4 OF JL RCWOS OF D. LACE LW NR, RORMTO THE ALA N CWANR OF THE NORTH IT LE MRWARR CGATNR OE1RIt1 R.V.II ID W TI WON NCEOx MOM 0= THE SIT OE MIT ENCE RMFAADEWN6 SURRIPERY NGAG SNO CENIEN� HE RiI IE NAN EJNNTR TO GA ICE SWIM lwf R CIOGA 21, 13FS R.OE TIEMR KTNGA6IM SW TN LIME CF SECTIONS RAW1 Wit ES M14E 1 O FITRCEMA' CIATERINE OF THE SO E!IS ' 1: THENCE NRRMSTFRYKON6 AD NO— I S NCrrMLY 1 TO MEIAlIE ECSION MRH ME RIME EAST BORIO LNE R SAWNV.L GOGR ATEM. IPEXCE WRNlSfERY ALGA. THE WE BWNC JIN OF AD MANAAN CLUB BRAIWD TO THE MAT FROUNI f'INSOF ST LIFE: GARDENS R.RWNON AS MELRIOD IN PLV MOON I PAGE ON R SI LUCEE CW111Y NAILS R[RD5 N SEGOEw E6,1 VANCIP 36 SCOT, RR NW EMI: TEEKE GORM KGAG SAID LIRA: TOME RRifM 9WION[ .1 OF F GH ST. LURE NRD AISWL IAIW .11, '. HEARTM AND, .W FLAT ..I,fi- 6 OF 5T L_ COGAIF IUAHC RCRDS AND THE SwRH WEE OF YRDN 16, TGNINES V 36 SWfN FANIi W EAST: THENCE EAST NM. IT SECIIGA 10. HUAN PX SRMI N.NR It H AT WOK I. PAID M OF s[ LIOE COGATY PINING HECCR65, ELIIMN TO THE 01WLWIE E% RRMIAIH 3M TH!MU50Nx.W MIMEIOMEW H 9A4YVALE SAD PNKFL k50?EN6THE NITUMSISRicD I)FRETHENCENWRN XIT GERA STINGY LM HE MRCEl10TNEXRR1MEii CRIER RSAUPUNI OF fi0NNN451Fhv ANE STIE SYME XO RFEE MTNUNi0 SOUGHTHE f WAS SONN 1M6 ETD DON: THEILORTIO M51 KGA6 EHE CFXRRIIE OF SWIM UNS MO COME i4 UAE AA SI OF WIW CENTN MX THE D GAI OF NT EA VET O A O DIRE; MEHCE IMEST 1114RECCUM OFS.D;TK%xSSI OM£i0APRHTR H- NTN1-11 E R NNMTfEVNE:IIEME MII AID WAIT VOLEIGAG I[ QInENW[ 0I w0 PEWEE INTO TO INS ION PENILTIOX PERT IE6- 0 THE CATEYVD IT US MDERY NV RDERRE N TANDIE IWI FIL COIALAWP0 1 T THE 1.1 OF U S ENFOOD I; TH THE NRHx KGAG THE LENEIEWE R IFS HII .A 1 i0 iR POWT Or INEPSECnW MEIN 1TN [RfIDW\f OF fY/WIMR PL.O IGR6111: IHENLE WBT KGA6 fl "HENCE MST MOM. AT M LIMAS TO THE INIOHt WOH ERWN]S RO1O IG 111n THENCE MST NOMG AD E01'.NOS HON] T.T. -.I. MM CEHIENWE R S:LIIG) ROAD 111.1 HN IHEXR - ALONG -HE CENSER NE OF AT SfLM[ ROAD TO ME IT... .1. SAW RNLGIONI I.SGU CHI, T.ENCE THRUM-TEENTY ALGAL TIC RV.FRD SRW M THE RNIERAE 0- ROROA TWiFG: THENCE NCHMFASIfR Y OROA NNIPR 10 THE W6T6ECnOH MH LEARERpE OR CODES CUT RF PL.D IC RWC 1-11 sRIMMSTERY KOW AD CLNIH4IN: OF FURS CHE OFF HO.D TO G FEIFAEY I IN RSA Sl L-COUNTY -1. IsiEF I7®rlp.nl.aT A eININY IB%wCNM BEGR AT IE SOL11- LENGTH R SECI DY W,1OMENS 31 SW IX FAIR AS FAST. SAID CRN-FA OBEIGAPOORONMECWERI\'MMENWHBOWOff E%MRWTHENCE nMIAONGiR CMTMUW R N55 RRYITGAPGIN CFW1EiHGTIONWRM CEMMK R OMx SIEDNBLATCIRNS.IMCiUIK0.4'6MERNIEANEOf50NMIESIEMNARW aW 10 RE A"ERSE[TIGAMRMTIE C3 TMWEE RSWIIMFSTSMREA BONkAMR):IIE,R ORTHNC\61HECErMH'A RSADSWMABONMODTOAMTMSHERNTERDEOF a"'W E" WM LYWG 9E11IFEX ROC16 IN] ANO I]91 M PRO Si LUCE SfCIDN OWIRA'ptCOP.]1010 ME RAI THEREOF AS REC ZO IN RAT BOOT 13 PMl S. U 10 V R.N'�C KCM OF SO l-CIE COUtt IAMCE WNHEbI KONG AP OL NA EE R6M- LF-WR TO THE CURTIRJIE R S30HARESI G07 D LLME BOR£YVIC CORTI% THENCE IROIGSIERY KOIG RN"E51. R --SE POUT 5T. LUCE BO.FML 10 ME " .IT.GAINSN I.T..O-iNIRYI51 DEl R090RIYNGA:RIERCERGAfNNESTER1 KING SON MW51 Rl RO BOVLYAR 1J PIE RDFIC9IL Of OIWNYE NIGHT—AFTWCNBLRl1I]I MO UND PRO SI LURE SECTION I-ORI N ITOTHE MT THROE AS RECINEJ INRAI AWN IS - 5S S'U TINHUU.- M RUDE RCORGM OF SI LUCIC R-WN R SUUTH 11 RDA.-11 uNN "-IRR -A C ITNAL IRON GI'.111 IIIENCLH 11AL5IERLY 401 NRIMLMI IRv ROOF M-Ww OF YD CANAL OT410 THE n E; - In W IN CEL^ERIST OF SNRn IRO. THEVCE NORTH KONG SHE CENfHORC OF W IN CLNIERIN OF MTTERTx SCENES AIP YAY 6R 1141 NEWE XORIFKGAE OIEIWET IW MYIM lCNTERLINE OF wtlCO ROAD IC;E IA To O REINIERSECHONINFE C]ITFIUWLIUSI.000M rAF.WD llUll SO THEAT[RRCIDX AIN CENTERYE C GT4lYw GNAT CS HEA1YN THEON" MNfHEASTERY AA\'S - - Oin:10 nN LIM R FN FE V EI II.E2 CN 1:1RBYEN rI Ty CFEsLEARICC//X%� MMnn YA.LR :RWEEt=T.a B. 0 *VaI. NC Vl_tnl tOAn �{I •r'-F z 1 .m*.A % ]A�er Cw•el WARr�I I. w�.rr�r.N fe+n R•.a'w iNANYX^p E.mmpAwEa.. AN, w Ew•1 rE•RWIUA�W Ar'. AGAAD R LO-Nv [OMN WS'OIES Page 156 of 381 TO: PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: AGENDA REQUEST Board of County Commissioners Grisel Cortes, Facilities Program Coordinator Facilities Department 8.C.1. 2022-54592 CONSENT AGENDA - FACILITIES DEPARTMENT DATE: 2/1/2022 *ACTION ITEM - BID AWARD QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEM? No Bid Award - Bid No. 21-091; Maintenance and Repair Services for County Fleet Vehicles On October 27, 2021, in response to RFP # 21-091, Maintenance and Repair Services for County Fleet Vehicles, bids were opened. Two proposals were received; 23 companies were notified and 10 bid documents were distributed. J W Automotive and St. Lucie Battery & Tire were the two qualified bidders. This is a two-year maintenance and repair services agreement for County Fleet Vehicles per Specifications of Bid No. 21-091. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FINANCIAL IMPACT: Sufficient funding is available in the Facilities operating budget, Equipment Maintenance -Sublet, 001-1920- 546006-190000. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval to award Bid No. 21-091, Maintenance and Repair Services for the County Fleet Vehicles to JW Automotive of Fort Pierce and St. Lucie Battery & Tire of Fort Pierce for an initial term of two years and two 1-year renewal options, authorize the Chair to sign the contracts as approved by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None Page 157 of 381 AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures Scott Beaulieu, Interim Facilities Director Jennifer Hill, Office of Management & Budget Director Wi. ?' Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Alphonso Jefferson, Deputy County Administrator Date: January 11, 2022 Date: January 12, 2022 Date: January 13, 2022 Date: January 13, 2022 Page 158 of 381 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BID 21-091 Maintenance and Repair Services for County Fleet Vehicles r LA � 0 t�NY L O R I D A PURCHASING DEPARTMENT DUE DATE: October 27,2021 @ 3:00 PM J W AUTOMOTIVE ST. LUCIE BATTERY & TIRE FAX:772-461-1188 Fax:772-489-2616 Description Percentage Hourly Percentage Hourly 1 What is your parts cost plus markup? 50% 30% 2 Hourly Shop Rate $94.00 $ 85.00 Description Unit Price Unit Price 3 Normal Preventive Maintenance Service Charge for Autos and Pickup Trucks based on five (5) quarts of oil and oil filter. Including (Hazardous waste& Disposal) Est. Downtime: $34.00/ 3/4 hr. $49.95/ 1 hr.- Full Synthetic Oil 4 If more than five (5) quarts of motor oil required, price per additional quart $4.99 $7.16 5 Run Vehicle Diagnostics, if needed. $0.00 initial scan free/ $85.00 per hr. beyond that 6 Fuel filter for gasoline engines - replace if needed $79.00 $39.95 7 Evacuate and Recharge Air Condition system, if needed $99.99 $69.95-R134 if newer vehicles that require 1234 $299.99 8 Transmission Fluid, filter and gasket Est. Downtime: $149.99 / 1.5 hr. $ 129.95 / 2hrs. 9 Transmission Flush for autos and pickup trucks. Est. Downtime: $149.99 / 2.0 hrs. $149.95 / 2hrs. 10 Single Wheel - remove wheels and check brake pads, cylinder and drums, and report if needed. Rotate tires if needed. Est. Downtime: $0.00 / 3/4 hr. $ 0.00 / 1 hr. 11 Dual Wheel - Remove wheels and check brake pads, cylinder and drums, and report if needed. Rotate tires if needed. Est. Downtime: $0.00 / 1.5 hr. $ 0.00 / 1 hr. 12 Windshield Wiper Blades for Ford Escapes 2008 and up, replace if needed $20.00/each side $12.00 13 Windshield Wiper Blades, Hook Type up to 22" replace if needed $10.00 /each side $10.00 14 Signal light bulbs, replace if needed $6.00 $5.00 +labor in some cases 15 Clearance light bulbs, replace if needed $21.00 $5.00 +labor in some cases 16 Parking light bulbs, replace if needed $6.00 $5.00 +labor in some cases 17 Headlight Bulbs replace if needed $21.00 $ 19.95 +labor in some cases Note: Estimated downtime is defined as the length of time from when our vehicle arrives in your shop until our departs your shop Page 159 of 381 Description of Normal Maintenance Service Can you Comply? Yes or No Yes or No 18 Oil Changes X X 19 Check gasoline air filters X X 20 Grease chassis X X 21 Replace grease fitting, if needed X X 22 Replace grease fitting, if needed X X 23 lCheck exhausts stem X X 24 Check cooling system - add 50/50 coolant if needed X X 25 Check all belts - report if needed X X 26 Check battery water - add if needed X X 27 Remove & clean battery cable connections X X 28 Check & clean battery hold down - replace if needed X X 29 Check headlights and parking lights - report improper operation X X 30 Check signal & clearance lights - report improper operation X X 31 Check horn - report improper operation X X 32 Oil door hinges X X 33 Check windshield wipers & washers - add fluid if needed and report improper operation X X 34 Check transmission - add fluid if needed X X some newer units are sealed 35 Check & grease drive line and u-joints X X 36 Check differential oil and pinion leaks and add gear oil if needed X X 37 Check master cylinder fluid and add fluid if necessary X X Description of Normal Preventive Maintenance Service Can you comply? Yes or No Yes or No 38 Check wheel bolt studs - report if necessary X X 39 Check for bent rims on wheels - report if necessary X X 40 Check tire pressure - correct air if necessary X X 41 Check tires for conditions, cuts and tread depth - report if necessary X X 42 Inspect all brakes - report if necessary X X 43 lCheck for broken/cracked glass and/or mirrors - report if necessary X X 44 Check for damage - bend body exterior parts (accident type) - report if necessary X X 45 Affix windshield sticker - displaying next service mileage & date X X 46 Check fire extinguisher date - report if necessary X X Additional information X X 47 Can your facility balance tires X X 48 Can you install brakes and brake components at your facility? X X 49 Can minor and major repair and service be done at your facility? X X 50 Is your service facility located in St. Lucie County? X X 51 The Successful Bidder shall warranty labor, materials and parts for a period of days, no less than 30 days for each work request. 365 365 or 12 K miles Number of companies notified*: 23 Number of bid documents distributed: 10 Number of bids received: 2 *per demandstar.com Page 160 of 381 TO: PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: AGENDA REQUEST Board of County Commissioners Gino Butto, Chief Information Officer Information Technology 8.D.1. 2022-54610 CONSENT AGENDA - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATE: 2/1/2022 *ACTION ITEM - CONTRACT QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEM? No Compuquip Technologies Agreement for Security Equipment Purchase with Three Years of Support The County entered into a five-year lease agreement with Compuquip Technologies on February 22, 2018 for the purchase of Checkpoint Security Gateways and support for firewall protection for county devices. We are seeking approval to replace the Checkpoint Security Gateways purchased in 2018, as well as purchasing an additional gateway to support the County Libraries. By adding one additional gateway to the libraries, the additional firewalls will provide a failover to the library internet. These new security gateways will have new security features as well as added throughput and capacity. With the acceptance of this new agreement with Compuquip Technologies, the fifth year lease payment of $61,968.02 due to Compuquip on March 31, 2022, for the contract entered into with St Lucie County Board of County Commissioners on February 22, 2018, will no longer be required. With the purchase of the new security gateways and the return of the leased equipment back to Compuquip as a trade in, the previous contract terms on St Lucie County contract C18-03-198 will be fulfilled. The Checkpoint Security Gateways come with the new Next Generation Threat Protection and Sandblast. This new protection includes threat extraction, anti -virus, identity awareness, anti-spam and an intrusion protection system. It also includes Sandblast Zero -Day protection solution, a cloud -based protection that provides Zero -Day threat emulation, URL filtering, VPN, anti-bot, firewall and (DLP) Data Loss Prevention. This gives us an added layer of protection that is screened before the data ever hits our environment. We are seeking approval of the new gateways, as well as three years of maintenance on the devices versus just one year of maintenance, to take advantage of the savings being offered by Compuquip when purchasing all the maintenance up front. Including three years of maintenance with the purchase of the gateways, we are looking at almost a fifty percent savings on the maintenance support package. Three years of up front support versus renewing from year to year will equate to an approximate savings to the County of $75,000 or 15% of the total quote, in addition to the trade in savings of $61,968.02. The total purchase price for the gateways and the three years of support will be $500,680.06. The funding for this purchase was approved as part of Cares Act monies approved by the Board in 2021. Page 161 of 381 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FINANCIAL IMPACT: The monies for this purchase were approved as part of the one time Funding added to the Information Technologies FY22 budget. Funding will stem from accounts 001009-1955-564000-190000 and 001009-1955- 534110-190000. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval of the agreement with Compuquip Technologies for the purchase of Checkpoint Security Gateways with three years of maintenance support and authorization for the Chair to sign documents as approved by the County Attorney. *91 krA I► IRMEel ►1/_T41IEel ►I RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None i Coordination/Signatures Date: January 18, 2022 Gino Butto, Chief Information Officer Date: January 20, 2022 Jennifer Hill, Office of Management & Budget Director wi'� l Date: January 21, 2022 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: January 24, 2022 Howard Tipton, County Administrator Page 162 of 381 OCOMpUQUIP CYBERSECURITY Compuquip Cybersecurity 9737 NW 41 Street, Suite 786 Doral, FL 33178 US Phone: (786) 641-5437 Fax: (786) 513-4633 Ship To William Martin Security Administrator St. Lucie County BOCC 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 United States (772) 462-1100 martinw@stlucieco.org GSA Contract: GS-35F-0511T Quote #: Quote Date: Expires On: Luis Garcia Quotation Q-08188-1 1 / 1 /2022 1 /31 /2022 (786) 593-1447 Igarcia@compuquip.com Send PO to: order@compuquip.com Bill To St. Lucie County BOCC 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 United States Section 1 - Trade in 5800 HA FWs to 6700 3 years support and subscriptions CPAP-SG5800-NGTP - [Device Name: slcfw1] - 00:1C:7F:85:96:35 HA cluster CPAP-SG5800-NGTP-HA - [Device Name: slcfw2] - 00:1 C:7F:85:9C:25 QTY PART# DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 2 CPAP-SG6700-SNBT Check Point - 6700 Base Appliance with SandBlast subscription package for 1 year $31,959.03 $63,918.06 2 CPES-SS-PREMIUM-ADD Check Point - Premium 7 x 24 Phone support - Period of performance is: 3 Years $19,040.00 $38,080.00 2 CPSB-SNBT-6700-2Y Check Point - Next Generation Threat Prevention and Sandblast for additional 2 years for 6700 Base Appliance $28,717.95 $57,435.90 Section 1 - Trade in 5800 HA FWs to 6700 HA cluster TOTAL: $159,433.96 Section 2 - Trade in 5200 Stand Alone to 3 years support and subscriptions 6600 HA FWs - Library Circuit CPAP-SG5200-NGTP - [Device Name: cpvaintfw] - 00:1C:7F:87:37:FF QTY PART# DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 2 CPAP-SG6600-SNBT Check Point - 6600 Base Appliance with SandBlast subscription package for 1 year $22,432.78 $44,865.56 2 CPES-SS-PREMIUM-ADD Check Point - Premium 7 x 24 Phone support - Period of performance is: 3 years $13,364.62 $26,729.24 2 CPSB-SNBT-6600-2Y Check Point - Next Generation Threat Prevention and Sandblast for additional 2 years for 6600 Base Appliance $18,379.49 $36,758.98 Section 2 - Trade in 5200 Stand Alone to 6600 HA FWs - Library Circuit TOTAL: $108,353.78 Page 1 of 9 Page 163 of 381 Section 3 - Trade in 5100HA FWs to 6600 3 years support and subscriptions CPAP-SG5100-NGTP - [Device Name: eoc-fw1] - 00:1 C:7F:87:91:11 HA Firewalls CPAP-SG5100-NGTP-HA - [Device Name: eoc-fw2] - 00:1C:7F:87:90:FF CITY PART # DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 2 CPAP-SG6600-SNBT Check Point - 6600 Base Appliance with SandBlast subscription package for 1 year $22,432.78 $44,865.56 2 CPES-SS-PREMIUM-ADD Check Point - Premium 7 x 24 Phone support - Period of performance is: 3 years $13,364.62 $26,729.24 2 CPSB-SNBT-6600-2Y Check Point - Next Generation Threat Prevention and Sandblast for additional 2 years for 6600 Base Appliance $18,379.49 $36,758.98 Section 3 - Trade in 5100HA FWs to 6600 HA Firewalls TOTAL: $108,353.78 Section 4 - Trade in 5100 FW to 6600 3 years support and subscriptions Standalone Firewall CPAP-SG5100-NGTP-[Device Name: cpj19cintfw]-00:1C:7F:87:96:FF CITY PART# DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 1 CPAP-SG6600-SNBT Check Point - 6600 Base Appliance with SandBlast subscription package for 1 year $22,432.78 $22,432.78 1 CPES-SS-PREMIUM-ADD Check Point - Premium 7 x 24 Phone support - Period of performance is: 3 years $13,364.62 $13,364.62 1 CPSB-SNBT-6600-2Y Check Point - Next Generation Threat Prevention and Sandblast for additional 2 years for 6600 Base Appliance $18,379.49 $18,379.49 Section 4 - Trade in 5100 FW to 6600 Standalone Firewall TOTAL: E87971 3 years support and subscriptions Section 5 - New Manager and SmartEvent CPAP-NGSM410-[Device Name: net1860]-00:1C:7F:86:CB:FO CPAP-NGSM410-EVNT - [Device Name: slceventrpt] - 00:1C:7F:86:CB:D6 QTY PART # DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENDED 1 CPAP-NGSM600M-BASE Check Point - Smart-1 600-M Base Gen-6 Security Management,Log and SmartEvent appliance for 25 gateways (SmartEvent and Compliance 1 year) $21,600.00 $21,600.00 1 CPES-SS-PREMIUM-ADD Check Point - Premium 7 x 24 Phone support - Period of performance is: 3 years $12,852.00 $12,852.00 1 CPAP-NGSM600M-BASE- EVNT Check Point - Smart-1 600-M Base SmartEvent dedicated appliance for 25 gateways (perpetual) $21,600.00 $21,600.00 1 CPES-SS-PREMIUM-ADD Check Point - Premium 7 x 24 Phone support - Period of performance is: 3 years $12,852.00 $12,852.00 Section 5 - New Manager and SmartEvent TOTAL: $68,904.00 TOTAL: $499,222.41 Freight: $1,457.65 QUOTE TOTAL: $500,680.06 With the acceptance of this quote via a formal purchase order, the 5th year lease payment of $61,968.02, due to Compuquip on 03/31/22 for the contract entered into with St Lucie County Board of County Commissioners on 02/22/18 will no longer be required. With the purchase of the new equipment and the return of the leased equipment back to Compuquip as a trade-in, the previous contract terms on St. Lucie County contract C18-03-198 will be fulfilled. Page 2 of 9 Page 164 of 381 Signature: Name (Print): Attest: By: Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and Correctness: By: County Attorney Effective Date: / / Title: THANK YOU FOR YOUR BUSINESS! Page 3 of 9 Page 165 of 381 COMPUQUIP TECHNOLOGIES, INC. - SERVICES TERMS & CONDITIONS TERM. This Agreement is effective upon acceptance by an executive officer of Compuquip Technologies, LLC. dba Compuquip Cybersecurity (the "Company"), and shall continue until the services to be performed hereunder (the "Services") are performed or this Agreement is otherwise terminated pursuant to the terms hereof. Either Company or Customer may terminate this Agreement without cause upon sixty (60) days prior written notice to the other, in which case Company shall determine its costs through the effective date of termination, and its percentage of completion of the Services, and determine what, if any, amounts are due back to Customer. Upon the termination of this Agreement and/or upon completion of the performance of the obligations set forth herein, the parties shall have no further obligations hereunder. The rights and obligations of the parties hereto shall survive termination of this Agreement to the extent necessary to preserve the intent of the parties. TIME OF PERFORMANCE: Unless otherwise stated in this Agreement, the Services will be provided from time to time during the term hereof between the hours of eight (8) a.m. and five (5) p.m. Monday through Friday, excluding holidays. Any Services performed outside this time period will be billed at Company's rate in effect at that time for services comparable to the Services performed. RESPONSIBILITY: (a) Access. Customer shall provide access to the Customer's facilities where its computer systems are maintained and adequate and suitable facilities and space for Company's personnel to work at the Location and on such computer systems. If Company determines that the Services require Company to remotely access Customer's computer systems, Customer agrees that it shall also provide Company with all information requested by Company in order to remotely access Customer's computer systems. (b) Representations and Warranties. In conjunction with the performance of the Services, Customer represents and warrants that (i) Customer has full right, power, and authority to consent to have the Services listed on the first page performed; and (ii) the execution, delivery and performance of this Agreement does not or will not violate or cause a breach default under: (A) the governing charter or organizational documents of Customer; (B) any agreement, lease, mortgage, license or other contract to which Customer is a party; or (C) any law, rule, regulation, order, decree or consent action by which Customer is bound or to which it is subject. Customer shall defend Company if the performance of the Services under this Agreement infringes any patent or copyright registered in the United States, trademark, trade secret or other intellectual property right. Customer also acknowledges and agrees that the providing of the Services may in some circumstances result in the disruption of services at such site(s) or loss or damage to software or hardware. Consequently, Customer agrees that it is Customer's responsibility to perform backups of data on all devices connected to Customer's IP addresses and/or domain names prior to Company providing the Services. Customer further assumes the risk for all damages, losses, and expenses resulting from the Services. Upon Customer's prior written request, Company will (at an additional cost to Customer), attempt to save any data and programs on Customer's computer systems that will be utilized by Company in the performance of the Services. (c) Limitations on Liability. The Services are being provided "as is" without any warranty of any kind. Without limiting the foregoing, Company makes no warranty whatsoever that the Services Page 4 of 9 Page 166 of 381 will be error -free, free from interruption or failure, or secure from unauthorized access, or that it will detect every vulnerability to Customer's network, or that the results generated by the Services, will be error -free, accurate, or complete. The Services may become unavailable due to any number of factors including scheduled or unscheduled maintenance, technical failure of the software, telecommunications infrastructure, or the Internet. This limitation shall apply regardless of whether (i) Company determines that Customer's systems are deemed "secure", (ii) Customer performs such modifications to its systems as Company reasonably suggests in order for its systems to be deemed "secure", or (iii) otherwise. Without limiting the foregoing, Company expressly disclaims all warranties, whether express, implied or statutory, and includes but not limited to the warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, title, and non -infringement of third party rights. Under no circumstances shall Company be liable to Customer or anyone claiming through or under Customer for any loss of profits, loss of data, equipment downtime, loss of goodwill, or for any indirect, incidental, exemplary, consequential, punitive or special damages relating to or arising out of this agreement, even if Company has been notified or the possibility of such loss or damage. The limitations of liability in this section shall apply to claims of every kind, whether based upon contract law, tort law, or otherwise, even if these limitations have the effect of exculpating Company from responsibility for its own negligence, fault, or other conduct. THE LIABILITY OF COMPANY FOR DAMAGES OR MONETARY PAYMENTS OF ANY NATURE WHETHER FOR BREACH OF WARRANTY, NONPERFORMANCE OR OTHERWISE SHALL IN NO EVENT EXCEED THE SUMS ACTUALLY PAID TO COMPANY BY CUSTOMER THEREUNDER. The foregoing provisions shall be enforceable to the maximum extent permitted by applicable law. This section shall survive any termination or expiration of Customer's agreement with Company. Customer acknowledges that this limitation on liability was specifically bargained for and is acceptable to Customer. Further, Customer's willingness to agree to the limitations contained in this section was material to Company's agreement to enter into this Agreement. (d) Force Majeure. Company shall not be responsible for failure to render any Services hereunder due to causes beyond its control, including, but not limited to, work stoppages, fires, civil disobedience, riots, rebellions, floods, war, acts of terrorism, delays in transportation, accident, failure of Customer to provide a suitable operating environment for Company, hardware malfunctions caused by defects in software or otherwise, failure of Customer to allow Company access to its computer system, acts of God and other similar occurrences. PAYMENTS: The Customer shall pay Company the total fees as set forth herein for the Services by: (i) an initial deposit in the amount agreed upon by the parties upon execution of this Agreement, if any; and (ii) payment of the full amount of the balance of the total fees on or before the date the Company begins the Services. Any Services provided to Customer by Company, which are not included under this Agreement, will be charged to the Customer at Company's then applicable rates and terms, and Customer agrees to pay all such charges on or before thirty (30) days after the date of Company's written invoice(s) for same. Company will have no obligation to perform any services for Customer, whether included in this Agreement or otherwise, unless all charges, fees, and taxes for Services rendered under this Agreement have been paid in full by Customer when due. In the event of non-payment of any sum due and owing under this Agreement, Company shall have the right to suspend or immediately terminate all Services and other services, without notice, and may determine whether or not to reinstate any Services upon receipt of payment in full of all sums owed. Page 5 of 9 Page 167 of 381 HIRING OF COMPANY'S EMPLOYEES: In the absence of Company's prior written consent, and for a period of twelve (12) months after the expiration or termination of this Agreement, for any reason whatsoever, Customer agrees not to hire or engage, directly or indirectly, any person who, at any time during the twelve (12) months immediately preceding such hiring or engagement, was an employee of Company employed to perform the Services or other services similar to the Services for any customer of Company. Company and Customer agree that the damages from a breach of this Section would be difficult to ascertain. Therefore, in the event Customer breaches this provision, Customer agrees to pay Company, as liquidated damages and not as a penalty, a sum equal to twenty-four (24) months' pay for each former employee of Company hired by Customer, at the rate paid by Company for the last full month of such employee's employment with Company. In addition, Company shall be entitled to temporary and permanent injunctions in order to prevent or restrain any such violation of this Section by the Customer or its partners, agents, representatives, servants, employers, employees and any and all persons directly or indirectly acting for or with the Customer. These remedies shall be in addition to, and not in limitation of, any other rights or remedies provided to Company hereunder or available to Company at law or in equity. MISCELLANEOUS: (a) This constitutes the entire Agreement between Company and Customer with respect to the delivery of the Services and no representation or statement not contained herein shall be binding upon Company or Customer unless in writing and executed by the party to be bound thereby. (b) This Agreement shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto and their respective successors and assigns. (c) This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida including all matters of contraction, validity, performance, and enforcement. (d) This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and of equal force and effect. (e) This Agreement and obligations of the Customer are not assignable without the prior written consent of Company. Any attempt to assign any rights, duties, or obligations, which arise under this Agreement without such consent, will be void. (f) If any provisions of this Agreement shall be held to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable; the validity, legality and enforceability of the remaining provisions shall not in any away be affected or impaired thereby. GENERAL: (a) Customer shall not make any deduction from, nor assert any right of set-off against, payments due to Company without Company's express prior written authorization. (b) Company may, for the performance of any of the various services required of Company under this Agreement, utilize the services of independent contractors selected by Company. (c) This Agreement may be executed in multiple counterparts, each of which shall be deemed to be an original and of equal force and effect, and all of which taken together shall constitute one and the same instrument. (d) Neither the failure nor any delay on the part of Company to exercise any right, power, or privilege hereunder shall operate as a waiver thereof, nor shall any single or partial exercise of such right, power, or privilege preclude any other or further exercise thereof. Page 6 of 9 Page 168 of 381 RELATIONSHIP OF THE PARTIES: The performance by the Company of the Services under this Agreement and shall be that of an independent contractor, and nothing in this Agreement shall create or imply an agency relationship between the parties, nor will the Agreement be deemed to constitute a joint venture or partnership between the parties. ADDITIONAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS: St. Lucie County ("Customer") is exempt from the payment of sales, like and use taxes. Scrutinized Companies Termination: The County may immediately terminate the Contract without cause at any time upon ascertaining that pursuant to § 287.135, Florida Statutes, a company is ineligible to, and may not, bid on, submit a proposal for, or enter into or renew a contract with an agency or local government entity for goods or services if at the time of bidding or submitting a proposal for a new contract or renewal of an existing contract, or at any time thereafter, the company: (1) is on the Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel List, created pursuant to § 215.4725, Florida Statutes, or is engaged in a boycott of Israel; (2) is on the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in Sudan List or the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in the Iran Petroleum Energy Sector List, created pursuant to § 215.473, Florida Statutes; or (3) is engaged in business operations in Cuba or Syria. Furthermore, the County may immediately terminate the Contract if it is determined that the company submitted a false certification stating that it was not (1) on the Scrutinized Companies that Boycott Israel List or engaged in a boycott of Israel; (2) was not on the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in Sudan List or the Scrutinized Companies with Activities in the Iran Petroleum Energy Sector List; (3) or was not engaged in business operations in Cuba or Syria when in fact the company was engaged in such activities at the time of the bid or proposal, or at the time of entering into or renewing the Contract. Public Records: The Company shall allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by The Company in conjunction with this Contract. Specifically, The Company shall: (a) Keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. (b) Upon request from the County's custodian of public records, provide the County with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Section 119 Florida Statutes or as otherwise provided by law. (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law for the duration of the Contract term and following completion of the Contract if The Company does not transfer the records to the County. Page 7 of 9 Page 169 of 381 (d) Upon completion of the Contract, transfer, at no cost, to the County all public records in possession of The Company or keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. If The Company transfers all public records to the County upon completion of the Contract, The Company shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public record disclosure requirements. If The Company keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the Contract, The Company shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All record stored electronically must be provided to the County, upon request from the County's custodian of public records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology system of the County. IF THE COMPANY HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE COMPANY'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT (772)462-1441, mailto:BellamyS a&stlucieco.org, COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE, FORT PIERCE, FL 34982 Interpretation; Venue: This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreements between the parties with respect thereto. This Contract may only be amended by written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by both parties hereto. This Contract shall be interpreted as a whole unit and section headings are for convenience only. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Contract, venue shall be exclusively in the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit for St. Lucie County, Florida, for claims under state law and the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. E-VERIFY/ VERIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT STATUS: Effective January 1, 2021, As required by Section 448.095(2)(a), The Company and subcontractor shall register with and use the E-Verify System to verify the work authorization status of all newly hired employees. The County, Contractor, or subcontractor may not enter into a Contract unless each party to the Contract registers with and uses the E-Verify System. The Company shall provide documentation of their compliance of this requirement to the County upon request. If The Company enters into a contract with a subcontractor, the subcontractor must provide The Company with an affidavit stating that the subcontractor does not employ, contract with, or subcontract with an authorized alien. The Company shall maintain a copy of such affidavit for the duration of this Contract. The County will not intentionally award contracts to any contractor who knowingly employs unauthorized alien workers, constituting a violation of the employment provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"). The County shall consider the employment by The Company of unauthorized aliens a violation of 8 U.S.C. Section 1324a(e) [Section 274A(e) of the INA]. The Page 8 of 9 Page 170 of 381 Company agrees that such violation by The Company shall be grounds for the unilateral cancellation of this Contract by the County. COMPANY: CUSTOMER: Compuquip Technologies, Inc. St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners By: JAMABy: Print Name: IVAN REZVOY Attest: By: CHAIR Deputy Clerk Approved as to form and Correctness: By: Page 9 of 9 County Attorney Page 171 of 381 TO: PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: AGENDA REQUEST Board of County Commissioners Gino Butto, Chief Information Officer Information Technology 8.D.2. 2022-54611 CONSENT AGENDA - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY DATE: 2/1/2022 *ACTION ITEM - CONTRACT QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEM? No Interlocal Agreement between the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County and the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit for the Lease of Server Rack Space at the Information Technology Facility located at 101 North Rock Road The County owns a secured Information Technology Facility located at 101 N. Rock Road, Fort Perce, FL 34945, hereinafter referred to as the "Data Cener". The Circuit desires to use the Data Cener to store its server rack. The County is willing to enter into this agreement with the User to permit them to use the Data Center. During the term of this Agreement, the Circuit shall have exclusive use of Server Rack 18, but the Circuit shall not have exclusive use of the Data Center, and the Circuit's use of the Data Center shall not preclude County staff access to the Data Center. The Data Center shall be maintained by the County, and shall be kept in conformity with general industry standards, all specific standards required by an regulatory body, and in strict conformity with the terms of this Agreement. The term of this Agreement shall be for two (2) years with an option to extend an additional one (1) year. Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause upon thirty (30) calendar days prior written notice to the other party. PREVIOUS ACTION: The prior agreement was approved on September 4, 2018. St. Lucie Contract C18-09-713. FINANCIAL IMPACT: The Circuit shall pay the County Three Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($350.00) per month for use of the Data Center and exclusive use of Server Rack 18. The Circuit shall also pay the County One Hundred and Twenty Eight Dollars ($128.00) per month for providing and maintaining a well -functioning data circuit for the Circuit's use. The total monthly fee to be paid to the County by the Circuit is Four Hundred and Seventy Eight Dollars ($478.00), (the "Agreement Payments"). Agreement Payments are due on or before the Tenth (10th) day of each month. The Agreement Payments include all applicable taxes, costs, fees, permit costs and fees, and all items necessary for the County to comply with all of the provision and maintenance requirements they have under this Agreement. Funds received will be applied to account number 001-1955-349200-190000. RECOMMENDATION: Page 172 of 381 Staff recommends Board approval of the Interlocal agreement between the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County and the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit for the Lease of Server Rack Space at the Information Technology Facility located at 101 North Rock Road and authorize the Chair to sign documents approved by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures +' Date: January 14 2022 Jennifer Hill, Office of Management & Budget Director Date: January 18, 2022 Gino Butto, Chief Information Officer W/- '? ' Date: January 18, 2022 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: January 18, 2022 Howard Tipton, County Administrator Page 173 of 381 INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY FACILITY AGREEMENT This Agreement is made this day of , 2022 by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, (the "County"), whose mailing address is 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida, 34982, and the NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, Circuit Administration, (the "Circuit"), whose mailing address is 250 NW Country Club Drive, Port Saint Lucie, Florida, 34986, (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Parties."). WHEREAS, the County owns a secured Information Technology Facility located at 101 N. Rock Road, Fort Pierce, Florida 34945, hereinafter referred to as the "Data Center"; and, WHEREAS, the Circuit desires to use the Data Center to store its server rack, and; WHEREAS, the County is willing to enter into this agreement with the User to permit it to use the Data Center; Now, therefore, in consideration of the mutual covenants and promises set forth herein, the Parties agree as follows: 1. The Data Center. The parties acknowledge and agree that the site of the server rack and equipment ("Server Rack 18") shall be a 4-foot x 2 foot floor space with front and back access points that measure between 3 feet to four feet, located in the Data Center. During the term of this Agreement, the Circuit shall have exclusive use of Server Rack 18, but the Circuit shall not have exclusive use of the Data Center, and the Circuit's use of the Data Center shall not preclude County staff access to the Data Center. The Data Center shall be maintained by the County and shall be kept in conformity with general industry standards, all specific standards required by any regulatory body, and in strict conformity with the terms of this Agreement. 2. County Commitments. The County shall: a. Provide the Circuit with access to the Data Center, Server Rack 18, and the Circuit's server and equipment 24 hours per day, seven days per week; b. Provide and maintain a perimeter fence surrounding the Data Center with controlled access to the gate entrance; c. Provide controlled access to the building and Data Center entrances; d. Provide and maintain security cameras inside and outside of the Data Center at all times; e. Provide and maintain a fenced cage which shall separate the Circuit's Server Rack 18 from the County's server racks; f. Provide and maintain proper climate control in the Data Center to insure the Circuit's server and equipment is not damaged by improper climate conditions within the Data Center; g. Provide and maintain: One 230V/30A electrical circuit (Side A and Side B), and one 120V/20A electrical circuit (Side A and Side B). S:\ATTI \AGREEMENT\FAC-USE\l9th Judicial Circuit - I.T. Facility Agreement - 22 Page 174 of 381 h. Provide and maintain a 4-foot x 2-foot floor space with front and back access points that measure between 3 feet to 4 feet; and i. Provide and maintain connectivity into the Data Center, and 50MB of data for use by the Circuit on the County's 250MB AT&T ASE Circuit. If the Circuit exceeds 50MB of bandwidth Five (5) times in a one month period the County has the right to charge for the additional bandwidth. The charge will be the cost the County incurs from AT&T for the additional bandwidth. The County will notify the Circuit in writing, as directed under this Agreement, any time the Circuit exceeds 50MB of bandwidth. In the event of an outage, the County will work with AT&T to restore the circuit in a timely manner. 3. Circuit Commitments. The Circuit shall: a. Provide its own server rack and equipment; b. Secure, service and maintain the Circuit's server rack and equipment as necessary; c. Provide all necessary personnel required to perform and fulfill all of the Circuit's requirements under this Agreement; d. Maintain control over personnel who have access to the Data Center, Server Rack 18, and the Circuit's equipment; and e. Use and occupy the Data Center and Server Rack 18 only for the purposes described under this Agreement. 4. Term/Termination. The term of this Agreement shall be for two (2) years beginning on October 1, 2021 with an option to extend an additional one (1) year. Either party may terminate this Agreement without cause upon thirty (30) calendar days' prior written notice to the other party. 5. Fees for Secured Storage. The Circuit shall pay the County Three Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($350.00) per month for use of the Data Center and exclusive use of Server Rack 18. The Circuit shall also pay the County One Hundred and Twenty -Eight Dollars ($128.00) per month for providing and maintaining a well -functioning data circuit for the Circuit's use. The total monthly fee to be paid to the County by the Circuit is Four Hundred and Seventy -Eight Dollars ($478.00), (the "Agreement Payments"). Agreement Payments are due on or before the Tenth (loth) day of each month. The Agreement Payments include all applicable taxes, costs, fees, permit costs and fees, and all items necessary for the County to comply with all of the provision and maintenance requirements they have under this Agreement. 6. Project Manager. The County project manager shall be William Martin, Information Technology Division Manager, whose contact information is martinw@stlucieco.org, (772) 462- 1859. The Court project manager shall be Stephen Shaw, Court Technology Officer, whose contact information is shaws@circuitl9.org, (772) 807-4395. 7. Personnel. The Circuit represents that it has, or will secure at its own expenses, all necessary employees and contractors required to perform the services under this Agreement. All employees employed by the Circuit shall not be employees of or have any contractual relationship with the County. S:\ATTI \AGREEMENT\FAC-USE\l9th Judicial Circuit - I.T. Facility Agreement - 22 2 Page 175 of 381 8. Independent Contractor Relationship. All persons engaged by the Circuit in any of the work or service performed pursuant to this Agreement, with the exception of County employees, shall at all times, and in all places, be subject to the Circuit's sole direction, supervision and control. The Circuit shall exercise control over the means and manner in which it and its employees perform the work, and in all respects, the Circuit's relationship and the relationship of its employees to the County shall be that of an independent contractor and not as employees or agents of the County. In addition, the Circuit shall not have the power or authority to bind the County in any promise, agreement or representation other than specifically provided for in this Agreement. 9. Non -Discrimination. The Circuit for itself and assigns, as a part of the consideration hereof, do hereby covenant and agree that no person on the grounds of face, color, national origin or sex shall be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits or, or otherwise be subjected to discrimination in the use of the Data Center. 10. Conflict of Interest. The Circuit hereby represents and warrants that neither it nor any of employees have any interest nor shall they acquire any interest, directly or indirectly, which would or may conflict in any manner or degree with the performance or rendering of the services herein provided. The Circuit further represents and warrants that in the performance of this Agreement, no person having such interest or possible interest shall be employed by it. No elected official or other officer or employee of the County of St. Lucie nor any person whose salary is payable, in whole or part, from County Treasury, shall participate in any decision relating to this Agreement which affects his/her personal financial interest nor shall any such person have any financial interest, direct or indirect, in this agreement or in the proceeds thereof. 11. Assignment. No party may assign their rights or obligations under this Agreement without the written consent of the other parties which consent shall not be unreasonably withheld. Any attempt to effect an assignment without the County's prior written consent shall be deemed a default under this Agreement. 12. Entire Agreement. This Agreement represents the entire understanding and agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof, and supersede all other negotiation, understandings, and representations (if any) made by and between such parties. 13. Severability. If any provision or portion of any provision of this Agreement shall be held invalid or unenforceable, the remaining provisions of the Agreement shall remain valid and enforceable. 14. Amendments. The provisions of this Agreement may not be amended, supplemented, waived or changed orally, but only in writing signed by the party as to whom enforcement of any such amendment, supplement, waiver or modification is sought and making specific reference to this Agreement. S:\ATTI \AGREEMENT\FAC-USE\l9th Judicial Circuit - I.T. Facility Agreement - 22 Page 176 of 381 15. Further Assurances. The parties hereby agree from time to time to execute and deliver such further and other transfers, assignment and documents and do all matters and things which may be convenient or necessary to more effectively and completely carry out the terms of this Agreement. 16. Notices. All notices, requests, consents and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing (including telex and telegraphic communication) and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier service, telecommunicated, or mailed (airmail if international) by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid), return receipt requested, addressed to: As to St. Lucie County: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 As to Circuit: Court Administrator Nineteenth Judicial Circuit 250 N.W. Country Club Dr., Ste. 217 Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 With a Copy To: St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 With a Copy To: Court Technology Officer Nineteenth Judicial Circuit 250 N.W. Country Club Dr., Ste. 217 Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this Section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered (a) on the date delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date telecommunicated if by telegraph, (c) on the date of transmission with confirmed answer bank if by telex, and (d) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. Whenever any party hereto is required to give its approval or disapproval to any matter contained herein, such approval or disapproval shall be given within twenty (20) days from receipt of written requests for approval or approval shall be deemed to be granted. 17. Indemnification. Consistent with section 768.28, Florida Statutes, neither party agrees to indemnify or insure the other party for the other party's negligence or to assume any liability for the other party's negligence. 18. Litigation Costs and Fees. In the event of a dispute arising out of this Agreement the Parties agree each shall bear its own fees and costs, including attorney fees, costs that are taxable under any applicable statue, rule, or guideline, as well as non-taxable costs, including but not limited to, mailing costs, any discovery or records costs, (such as filing fees, deposition charges, copying costs, postage, and related expenses), up through and including any appellate actions. 19. Governing Law; Venue. This Agreement and all transactions contemplated by this Agreement shall be governed by, construed, and enforced in accordance with the laws of the State S:\ATTI \AGREEMENT\FAC-USE\l9th Judicial Circuit - I.T. Facility Agreement - 22 4 Page 177 of 381 of Florida. In the event of any disputes arising out of this Agreement in which it becomes necessary for a party to bring any action in a competent Circuit of law, venue shall be exclusively in the Eighteenth Judicial Circuit in and for Brevard County, Florida for claims arising under state law, and exclusively in the United States District Circuit for the Southern District of Florida for claims which are justiciable under federal law. 20. Public Records. The Circuit shall allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by the Contractor in conjunction with this Contract. Specifically, the Circuit shall: (a) Keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. (b) Upon request from the County's custodian of public records, provide the County with a copy of the requested records or allow the records to be inspected or copied within a reasonable time at a cost that does not exceed the cost provided in Section 119 Florida Statutes or as otherwise provided by law. (c) Ensure that public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public records disclosure requirements are not disclosed except as authorized by law for the duration of the Contract term and following completion of the Contract if the Circuit does not transfer the records to the County. (d) Upon completion of the Contract, transfer, at no cost, to the County all public records in possession of the Circuit or keep and maintain public records required by the County to perform the service. If the Circuit transfers all public records to the County upon completion of the Contract, the Circuit shall destroy any duplicate public records that are exempt or confidential and exempt from public record disclosure requirements. If the Circuit keeps and maintains public records upon completion of the Contract, the Circuit shall meet all applicable requirements for retaining public records. All record stored electronically must be provided to the County, upon request from the County's custodian of public records, in a format that is compatible with the information technology system of the County. IF THE CIRCUIT HAS QUESTIONS REGARDING THE APPLICATION OF CHAPTER 119, FLORIDA STATUTES, TO THE CIRCUIT'S DUTY TO PROVIDE PUBLIC RECORDS RELATING TO THIS CONTRACT, CONTACT THE CUSTODIAN OF PUBLIC RECORDS AT (772)462-1441, BellgMSkstlucieco.org, COUNTY ATTORNEY' S OFFICE 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE, FORT PIERCE, FL 34982 21. E-Verify/ Verification of Employment Status. Effective January 1, 2021, As required by Section 448.095(2)(a), the Circuit and subcontractor shall register with and use the E-Verify System to verify the work authorization status of all newly hired employees. The County, Circuit, or subcontractor may not enter into a Contract unless each party to the Contract registers with and uses the E-Verify System. The Circuit shall provide documentation of their compliance of this requirement to the County upon request. S:\ATTI \AGREEMENT\FAC-USE\l9th Judicial Circuit - I.T. Facility Agreement - 22 5 Page 178 of 381 If the Circuit enters into a contract with a subcontractor, the subcontractor must provide the Circuit with an affidavit stating that the subcontractor does not employ, contract with, or subcontract with an unauthorized alien. The Circuit shall maintain a copy of such affidavit for the duration of this Contract. The County will not intentionally award contracts to any contractor who knowingly employs unauthorized alien workers, constituting a violation of the employment provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"). The County shall consider the employment by the Circuit of unauthorized aliens a violation of 8 U.S.C. Section 1324a(e) [Section 274A(e) of the INA]. The Circuit agrees that such violation by the Circuit shall be grounds for the unilateral cancellation of this Contract by the County. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day of , 2022. ATTEST: DEPUTY CLERK ATTEST: DEPUTY CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIR APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: COUNTY ATTORNEY COURT ADMINISTRATION, NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT Digitally Signed by Pally Harris sDN: ct at -Nineteenth Judicial Circuit ou=CourtHarris,Administration, Patty Harr BtT. email=harrisp@circuitl9.org, c=US II Date: 2022.01.13 13:41:10-05'00' TRIAL COURT ADMINISTRATOR PRINT NAME: S:\ATTI \AGREEMENT\FAC-USE\l9th Judicial Circuit - I.T. Facility Agreement - 22 6 Page 179 of 381 kc LUCE ��J TO: PRESENTED BY SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: AGENDA REQUEST Board of County Commissioners Kori Benton, Assistant Planning Manager Planning & Development Services 8.E.1. 2022-54641 CONSENT AGENDA - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DATE: 2/1/2022 *ACTION ITEM - PERMISSION TO ADVERTISE QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEM? No Request Permission to Advertise a Hearing to Consider the Historical Commission's Recommendation on the Designation of Property at 9809 S. Indian River Drive The property owners of 9809 S. Indian Drive, Linda Ash -Jackson and Paul Jackson, have petitioned to demolish a primary residence, accessory guest house and garage that were deemed eligible for local historic designation. On August 9, 2021, the Historical Commission held a meeting to evaluate whether to schedule a hearing to review the historic significance of the subject property, and on January 4, 2022, held a hearing on Historic Designation. After discussion, the Commission passed a motion to recommend the Board of County Commissioners release the proposed demolition, not enacting an emergency designation of the property. In accordance with Land Development Code Section 4.11.06, the Designation Report and Commission's recommendation shall be to the Board of County Commissioners within thirty (30) days of their hearing to schedule a final hearing. Staff is seeking permission to advertise the final hearing, before the Board of County Commissioners, on March 15, 2022, said advertising including posting of the property, notice to the property owners, and courtesy notifications to owners of property within 1,000 ft. of the subject site. PREVIOUS ACTION: On January 4, 2022, the Historical Commission held a hearing on the subject Historic Designation. After discussion, the Commission passed a motion to recommend the Board of County Commissioners release the proposed demolition, not enacting an emergency designation of the property. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Page 180 of 381 Staff recommends permission to advertise a final Designation Hearing for 9809 S. Indian River Drive for the March 15, 2022 Board of County Commissioners' Meeting, at 6:00 p.m., or soon thereafter as may be heard. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures Date: January 21, 2022 Benjamin Balcer, Planning & Development Services Assistant Director Date: January 21, 2022 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: January 24, 2022 Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator Page 181 of 381 ST. LLI�[E F L ❑ R January 4, 2022 Public Hearing Report Dates: 8/9 Et 12/2, 2021 Owner Linda Ash -Jackson Et Paul Jackson Location 9809 South Indian River Drive Parcel ID 3529-223-0001-000-5 Historic Status Non -Designated Structure Eligible for Local Designation Zoning RE-2 (Residential, Estate — 2du/ac) Zoning District, Owner Request Demolition of a primary residence, accessory guest house and garage. Historical Commission's Initial Action Consider a recommendation of Designation to the Board of County Commissioners Staff Request & Recommendation Evaluate the historic signifi- cance and condition of the subject structure, and consid- er whether to recommend designation of the structure(s) as historic or release of the request for demolition. Staff Kori Benton, AICP Historic Preservation Officer Planning and Development Services Department Historic Preservation S T. LUCIE COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION i 1; Public Hearing for Proposed Historic Designation - Historical Commission Initiated 9809 South Indian River Drive —Fort Pierce, FL H I S T O R Y c. 1941 Date of Residence construction per Florida Master Site File (8SL1231) c. 1953 Date of Guest House & Garage construction the Property Appraiser's records ANALYSIS OVERVIEW Historical Significance: The primary wood frame structure is associated with WWII & Aftermath, with the original guest house and garage contributing to the campus. Architectural Significance: The single -story wood flame residence located at 9809 South Indian River Drive represents a simplistic styling expressed by a rectangular plan, drop siding, and side gable roof with composition shingles and various decora- tive trim. Exterior wall fabric consists of drop siding, with some modern siding replacements. The primary structure predominantly features non -original windows, with 2 over 2 design. Building modified are estimated in the 1960s and 2015. A non -original wood deck wraps a notable portion of the structure. The guest house has maintained much of the original design and material, whereas the garage has some non - original siding, windows and door. Request: The applicants are requesting to demolish the primary residence, guest house and garage to pursue a redevelop- ment project including subdivision. The applicant met with the St. Lucie County Development Review Com-mittee (DRC) to explore subdivision of the 3.93-acre into two (2) or four (4) lots. Definitive reuse plans have not been filed, however a "Lot Split to divide the parcel into two (2) is active with the Planning Division. Page 182 of 381 { T' 1 ' 'F'Y Y � 7Fs� - �... y Jr�• T1 �. 'tJ i�R: M4T.J�:�� loll h ...... 4 Survey Snapshot LHINL�E]IT 675.7�' mgas J J ANCEL NNE EKTEKCE]p �. UN M � 9✓ti"lN Pik -1 Primary Residence g$D IND LN ST6RT ..�....."...� Wpm WL44 1E+n HLii w✓•lER NNE SEE DETAL 1 + Eie.'>•71oY -ate r.,t.v.n IX ,MrD DEYANTY0 ����yy `F E�NNI,YWFNTAL FNpIF.CTCM E{IJPYIXT � � YEagipm ifilL 18, R➢19 Guest House BENCH MARK 02 CLEIWGIT O OfP[ XdEO �]VL' GUEST HCUSE �ocK :EE DETAIL: -- rn�auN i�y4 o N�945E Garage .d IROfl ° r N 508�5'�� � FdIJN 589'4932 W talc 496.49' calc GM[I��YEM F0 58949'58"W grid 496.41 macs �qp Fl� P w Pending Lot Split DINT OF Ac.orrraming aa,4yo square leer ar �. ri acres, more or less. `-•• • • --• BEGINNING EGINNING ARCEL 1 TOGETHER WITH PARCEL 2 EAST (DEED) !cl S 89 4227" E (C) 712' +/- 47+/- Q N �� EASTELYRIGHTOFWAYLINE OF FLORIOA EAST COAST RAILROAD 679'+/- _ _ r p s PARCEL 9 O SOLITHEASTEIiLY -- IQ � �� INDIAN WEST (DEED) (cl_ N894227"W C r) o a 685.00' �_ �� �� EASTERLY Morvu7ENrEu RIVER J S 89W 27"E (C) l� EASTERLY. -y� -'. r- c i LINE POINT OF \\ MONUMENTED LINE�\ p o O 3EGINNING APPROXIVATELOG470N PARCEL 2 n OF SEPTIC DRAINKELD al 7s sL + SOUTHEASTERLY h } PARCEL 2 126 +� -~' SCALE.' +I 9"= 100' + ' N894227"W(C) 496.4'+/- 88��1182.28 A-1- HARTLEY URt%EYllVG, INC Page 185 of 381 S T A F F ANAL Y S IS Demolition Request Is the structure of such interest or quality that it would reasonably meet national, state, or local criteria for designation as a significant historic or architectural site or structure? Is the structure of such design, craftsmanship or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or expense? Is the structure one of the last remaining exam- ples of its kind in the county or region? JL Would retention of the structure promote the general welfare of the County by providing an opportunity for study of local history, architec- ture and design or by developing an understand- ing of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage? Are there definite plans for re -use of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what will be the effect of those plans on the char- acter of the surrounding area STAFF RECOMMENDATION The subject structures generally meet the local criteria for designation as significant historic, for Architectural Significance, context of devel- opment during WWII and the subsequent development period. • LDC Section 4.11.06. Criteria 1. The structures displays a simple Wood Frame Vernacular styling ex- pressed by a by a rectangular lines, drop siding, and gable roofs, fea- turing composition shingles, and simple ornamental features. The structural condition has not been well documented by staff, however the applicant has provided documentation detailing condition as assessed by a private party. The structures display an architectural style that is commonly found throughout South Florida and exhibit some modifications. A . M && The structure reflects development the development pattern along In- dian River Drive in the 1940s, as architectural styles shifted. The ar- chitecture and design is limited, however the development pattern and context are valuable. The guest house condition, and detached nature of the garage contrib- ute to the historic development pattern along the Drive. Incorporating these structure into the redevelopment plan is encouraged, considering greater viability to relocate. The applicant has presented preliminary plans for redevelopment, however the viability has not been verified. A "Lot Split" application, to divide the parcel into two lots is active with St. Lucie County. A copy of the 2021 Pre -application Report for the proposed redevelop- ment is attached for review. Staff recommends the Historical Commission evaluate the historic significance and condition of the subject structures, and consider whether to recommend historic designation to the Board of County Commissioners or release the request for demolition. Based upon the simple Wood Frame vernacular styling, architectural significance, and displayed condition, staff is recommending against a designation request for the site while encouraging the owners to incorporate the guest house and detached garage into a redevelopment plan that consists of no more than two (2) lots, retaining the predominant development pattern along Indian River Drive. Attachments Florida Master Site File 8SL1231 Main House Inspection Report (applicant exhibit) Guest House Inspection Report (applicant exhibit) Page 186 of 381 6 Potential Motions (Subject to critique before hearing) AFTER CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION DOCUMENTS, THE STAFF REPORT, STAFF COMMENTS & TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 4.11.06. - DESIGNATION PROCESS AND PROCEDURE AND 4.11.07. - EMERGENCY ACTIONS OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION APPROVE THE DEMOLITION REQUEST(S) (NOT RECOMMENDING AN EMERGENCY DESIGNATION ACTION) BECAUSE... AFTER CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION DOCUMENTS, THE STAFF REPORT, STAFF COMMENTS & TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 4.11.06. - DESIGNATION PROCESS AND PROCEDURE AND 4.11.07. - EMERGENCY AC-TIONS OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION APPROVE THE DEMOLITION REQUEST FOR THE PRIMARY RESIDENCE (NOT RECOMMNDING AN EMERGENCY DESIGNATION ACTION), ENCOURAGING THE PRESERVATION OF THE GUEST HOUSE & GARAGE WITHIN FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PLANS... AFTER CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION DOCUMENTS, THE STAFF REPORT, STAFF COMMENTS & TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 4.11.06. - DESIGNATION PROCESS AND PROCEDURE AND 4.11.07. - EMERGENCY ACTIONS OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION DISAPPROVE THE DEMOLITION REQUEST(S), IN FAVOR OF RECOMMENDING AN EMERGENCY DESIGNATION ACTION TO DESIGNATE THE SUBJECT STRUCTURE(S) WITH A RECOMMENDATION THAT THE OWNER IS ABLE TO DIVIDE THE SUBJECT PARCEL, ALLOW AN ADDITIONAL HOME, WITH THE MOTION INTENDING TO SUPPORT REASONABLE DIMENSIONAL AND DESIGN CRITERIA CONCESSIONS NECESSARY TO PRESERVE THE STRUCTURE(S) BECAUSE... Page 187 of 381 4261 Dant Blvd Reno, NV 89509 Kris McCrain Associate Planner St. Lucie County, Florida Via email: McCraink@stlucieco.org Re: Jackson Lot Split (LS-5202126032) & Greystoke Estate Pre -Application (PreApp- 4202126023) 9809 South Indian River Drive Parcel ID: 3529-223-0001-000-5 Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Request for historical review Dear Mr. McCrain: Thank you so much for all of your help on this project. As we have discussed there are two living structures on the existing 4 acre lot. These are the original home dated 1940, and a smaller guest house dated 1953. The main home apparently had been struck by lightning in the relatively recent past and had been completely rebuilt we assume from the permitting that has been done within the past 10 12 years. It had been completely remodeled. The only original features we believe are there, are some Dade County pine floors that we were planning on salvaging, and the fireplace that is non-functional today and likely requires extensive rebuilding if we were to keep the house intact. Kitchen, baths, bedroom, electrical are all modern. The guest house is smaller; The floors have been replaced and the kitchen and the bath reflect modern remodeling and styling. We have been investigating how to manage our plans based on moving or demolishing one or both of these structures. We would like to request a historical review of the structures to determine if either or both would be required to be relocated on the property, or if they can be taken down and used for salvage. At the present time, we are unable to occupy these homes since we were unable to secure homeowners' insurance, other than fire and liability, and they are insured as vacant. Page 188 of 381 We will be in Florida the 22" d of July to the 29th in the morning and we can take any photos or meet someone at the site to review if that is required. At lease one of us will attend the meeting in person on August 9. Please let me know if you or the Historical Committee require any additional information Very truly yours, Linda Ash -Jackson and Paul Jackson Page 189 of 381 L� C @ L3 Li 12-7 tz St. LCounty H'lstorI l ComrMss'Mn January 4, 2022 9809 South Indian River Drive Demolition Request / Historical Commission Initiated Designation Planning and Development Services Kori Benton, AICP, Historic Preservation Officer & Assistant Planning Manager Page 190 of 381 ST. L[1CIE oa N-T�y F L ® R ST. LUCIE COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA January 4, 2022 NOTICE OF POTENTIAL HISTORIC DESIGNATION rM SL lucx CxPtlr XelaxY Cawn+rxx wvPrw. Y mn•aI +n WaL.rP rPryP+mP rapsa r r er.r. r cprrP, CcaIPP+tIwx++ rw PAP fx.M YIt1AP MLr Irlr•. AILYOIP• M ma Ih rv,r►m welPnr wn Y.IIY • Prwr+•�t W Awe. IPe �41a.•IniwV nnraM aPm+Hl. r+d :e:alm LAP brr.Y[/DIA a?t: Om Pnv Porn Al' AP•A• ciao ]r-r7sapMmo-S Ilnry iCwP , - lu ne rnn.YaO b J 1l, 1 1 Ir,4p%e :ulx W. l,•a p/+nt I, (aryl . IPmm:n>Pn amrr: nn.vrq +Iwrmr, ani:nve .<I pvr. gmm,+[NLa rM pxX i!n vv.P i71 a rcrw x11t tM Sx Lwe CVIn', FLIrti1O 3w,i:N Ip Xu .q fprmn,Pr mry .VmrmrM �drPX a rx exnnnm'XPxA x s-art. a x: n �mu,e m e+arOmvx Huv:r Laaya:P^ P'iAoA91 a ve PMm d nlm., Canm+snrP•, b cot n +! W nn aqe :' I mlalml17nnq s+m ;p +nuXa,i LOCIIIpe P SuftkWiOY Dflw won YWMP JSiFIIaW914R5 I'I rrx rww wAm Pe M rWP M M ALA1 YM CewNMP prlrlL•re W,py ,non MYr. 3k sea,Yla Cenha.l wrgrp, m rryelr a•Aur rnnPwn.PpMse, 7AWw.JA•en'L 4.2 1YQ ArpAr;yw 400•w n w wn I•x:nnmw�dv. PL r[arYry rx'wtswh om gp:M•'ryroxIxa: W'Axn ®elb e.vl a ,I1 ey OtIL A+Yp V,v a,r- ce c+nCnta. YPVM coil [�l+Oxl rJeM m xs trl xr HP»na P,a np.,ypryv SM•r%�in HpMmwA. Ilxl+x0 ox+nn a Iw+l , n.,. p.v ,: rM rvmlaM <vr M'n �ntlyd lie h a,Wnae AP Iw Hn a AIn I'unnVa ft =1 On,Wpnrt 5encn PsN•rPxra -hang XitrS ,la'W 11 21UO 1'I�I a.ew,, T V[mr F,n 3+mv, nmmuxm raV•W turn¢ nwra H„ea :a1 f»iBri'0.l i+R:rs}. rPtA + vru Mn nr 9.r,xsm n Ira., a :w<m, mrwnI, cmmn I» S Iu:a Ldrrr xa,fca (am>•rsnx W :M "I ro "I" ant nxpnmfr.; rrn;rc acnunnr cr Prolnrx . n yl was'rt'+ rrmcrov'rr l,rrx cmxfrarnq Irx P,ra d rc'PM �-mmn•a,. lrs rrn[cta�gc nl rM.,x 1't d"4/ m1i1 ruaAlrJn l9 SlC1inM SAf.9I95. IL9Pg4 Sf1UVJ13 n a :con suet r, Iaari �w a:•+..� .en or n, nan.Kr rrm�Iwrl.cs �rlu,•.� m m, Ins'•.. rrx�rw r a nrh•+m nI nr.,rg era:.r.0 nffa n rx�:Ia d rs rrormenr. tr• +cos ru.:mr. Ix x re -rr •rsa +: elw�r -.er a rtP rnr:+edms s PUA,..nr,+rrr.:m n+.:,m n. •r...nrnr .'•a wn��a.:n .urn n. smr•nmor :.Kra i- M�YV.nnd%MdIOa anMlq �Iv •nt vl :� ��� P^r++'b I: Vv rcux[ung wl•n pnxM w rwmmnry V::wu=na�ex cot •e r If+aM'a ar,m s norm wpI rn,�P P Apnve+ ,Is,surr. , vA'K Wangnw L+crxw•IA h:m Ime w tmr b a aSe savor 1wp,x xw A o•wrlh r:vnnl pW rtmpeMnl u L=m4Ta mrPlry rPWn :Past •c Y. L.+:r Cosh 4n, L6w;o al hM bh rgM N•! twI'+Prix, ro rlrq u:: rocs, tsPaa lou. Inaba I+aA. n61CAVP COu+69ON 51 LU][ Oxnri IL64M 15I ICSJJp Y V JOGS, fails AhaLM AMf-OAeI.Ar.__-- Public Notice . L�r rru rra.r—rs-sae •�a rr�r�r-rrza �s�rrritf ra�:rr� 7 _ LilLL= Historical Commission neeeyrme: Courtesy Public Hearing Notice 4:00 Pr (or Tuesday, January 4, 2022 Notice of Proposed Historic Designation Th_ M SNtLery CM) NawyE Potential St. Lucie County Historic Commission initiated Designation Slattery (TR) 9601 S Indian Riser DR - Fort Pierce; FI 349CI 7826 Flearirm Location: BOCC mbers Cha SLC Administration Annex, 230O Virginia A—, Fort Pierce, FL 34M I TManA FortP3 Fort FPnd ierce, R 39950 Farrel A: 352327.L01A}-0LR5 prP:iivcmrvhia 1, 077f. 2'6,v:a5rc::5rLao.•:1 Addresc- 4309 S_—W Mdan>Z—D— Hequ est: The applicants are requesting a notable portion of the structum, Review So+xe to d¢motish the primary residesam The guest house has maintained Pa'v+n''al'4esfmc of as•I¢a guest house and garage tv puesue a much of the original design and ma- !1]paxei aNairleug fJJ redevelopment pmje& including mWi- terial• whereas the garage has some vision. Definitive reuse ptaos have not n-orignal siding windows and llle Designation Staff keport and Flo,- been Sled, however a "Lot Split to di- d-1 ids Master Site file for the subject vide the parrel into two (2) is active project area Kahle ds igh inquiry- +with the it Lucie County Planning Divi- Meebu9PmPa ton: Further details are available in the m The owmer(s) met wig the St Documentation far the Historical Planning 8 Devulapnent Services Lucie County Development Review Commission Agenda Packet should Deparhrlarrt - PLa 9 Orwision please Committee (DRC) tx explore suhdM_ be received by the Planning & Devel- no sion of the 3.93-aere into iwm (2) or went Services Department - Plan - {Bent 482-2618 Tel (T7 Benton. 18 four (4j [o". i Division a least 14 days prior Email: Email: Ben[onk�sl3ucieco.org to the scheduled hearing. nrrhitecmral tig ifwance: The singke -sorry wood Game residence located at General written comments to the 98D9 South lndian River Drnre rep; Mitancal Commission, should be yen" a simp�c s[yiing expressed by received by the Rannung 8. Devefop- a rectang• ular pL drop siding, and ment Services Department - Plan - side gable roavrith composition shin- ning Division at lea t 3 days prior to gles and various decorative trim. at_ the scheduled hearing nor wall fabric consists of drop siding with some modern siding mpfave- Anyone wish a disability requiring mints The primary strucnarn pBdomi- u mmodations to attend this nantty fneatures original windows, meeting may contact the SLC Com- with 2 over 2 design. Building moths- mrmiry Risk Manager at least 48 cations are estimated in the 1960s and hours m advaree at (772) 462-1546 2015. A .o—riginal wood deck wraps or TDD (772) 462-1428. D•w Mailed: December 13. 2021 Page 191 of 381 girl, ILCECELE - , T Exceptional Historic Resource (LDC 4.11.02) THE QUALITY OF SIGNIFICANCE IN LOCAL HISTORY, ARCHITECTURE, ARCHEOLOGY, ENGINEERING, AND CULTURE IS PRESENT IN DISTRICTS, SITES, BUILDINGS, STRUCTURES, EARTHWORKS, MOUNDS, AND OBJECTS THAT POSSESS INTEGRITY OF LOCATION, DESIGN, SETTING, MATERIALS, WORKMANSHIP, FEELING, AND ASSOCIATION, AND: 1) THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH EVENTS THAT HAVE MADE A SIGNIFICANT CONTRIBUTION TO THE BROAD PATTERNS OF OUR HISTORY; OR 2) THAT ARE ASSOCIATED WITH THE LIVES OF PERSONS SIGNIFICANT IN OUR PAST; OR 3) THAT EMBODY THE DISTINCTIVE CHARACTERISTICS OF A TYPE, PERIOD OR METHOD OF CONSTRUCTION, OR THAT REPRESENT THE WORK OF A MASTER, OR THAT POSSESS HIGH ARTISTIC VALUES, OR THAT REPRESENT A SIGNIFICANT AND DISTINGUISHABLE ENTITY WHOSE COMPONENTS MAY LACK INDIVIDUAL DISTINCTION; OR 4) THAT HAVE YIELDED, OR MAY BE LIKELY TO YIELD, INFORMATION IMPORTANT TO HISTORY OR PREHISTORY. Page 192 of 381 ST. L[1CIE ou nl-T�y F L ® R Location Map C� historic wood frame guest house - To S Indian River Lane w 1 historic wood frrne garage Indian River SL 1231 Page 193 of 381 tv • �?� : it f ' .i' �•' t , •r r . ,�i� '�.. 1y • . •FJ z§ q14;a 3 t �' .l Z •A + ' • -• 1. � ST. L[1CIE OC.I N-T�Y F L ® R l 9809 S. IRD - Guest House & Garage Page 195 of 381 U70-re figs mr__j V;. EFT 91110111[o ST. L[1CIE ou nl-T�y F L ® Rlimb Existing Survey & Active Petition •tlOx tC`x]�M IN 0111— h NIR1i 9r MFY'04 !Qi N �U'H1. "••••w'�•••••.•"'•• �• — SC FE£r IN MO'M 04 EAOI 51]E 5 TIE CFNiW 5111E TiA:k 5 THE rEc. 9NlR6A] LY PIN• AS Cb.Si9LClED Tip W 5H .k'�b L+rvLs 'L 6E"IVHING �'+ EAST (DEED) i._ S 89'4227" E (D) 712r +I- 47' +1- EASTERL Y RYGHT OF WAY LNE 679` f� OF FLOROA EAST COASTRAILROA0 cs Cif - � I"IR SOUTHEASTERLY 'k _ } WEST (DEED)j� k EA sTE,�L y }727r,� � () 685, 00' � MONUMENT 1 f / r77" C C S 89.42 L I (C) EA.S TERL Y � � �-� � �� LINE l�+ r l� T OF MONLIMENTED UNE-10 / o INNING APPROX(MATELOCATlON --� a re Y EL 2 OF SEPTICDR,4INFIELD t5! _ PARCEL 2 SOUTHEAST_ERL Y 128' +, I- �4 N 89 "42 27" [N C (� 496. 4' +I- S S O S 62, 28' +1- �82. NARTL Page 198 of 381 girl, ILUCELE Proposed Split — Context N �^ 7 L I O Page 199 of 381 girl, UECELE - , T o T Staff Recommendation Staff recommends the Historical Commission evaluate the historic significance and condition of the subject structures, and consider whether to recommend historic designation or release the request for demolition to the Board of County Commissioners. Based upon the simple Wood Frame vernacular styling, architectural significance, and displayed condition, staff is recommending against a designation request for the site while encouraging the owners to incorporate the guest house and detached garage into a redevelopment plan that consists of no more than two (2) lots, retaining the predominant development pattern along Indian River Drive. Page 200 of 381 girl, ILUCHE Potential Motions AFTER CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION DOCUMENTS, THE STAFF REPORT, STAFF COMMENTS & TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING AND THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 4.11.06. - DESIGNATION PROCESS AND PROCEDURE AND 4.11.07. - EMERGENCY ACTIONS OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION RECOMMEND: APPROVAL OF THE DEMOLITION REQUEST(S) TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (NOT RECOMMENDING AN EMERGENCY DESIGNATION ACTION) BECAUSE... APPROVAL OF THE DEMOLITION REQUEST FOR THE PRIMARY RESIDENCE TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (NOT RECOMMENDING AN EMERGENCY DESIGNATION ACTION), ENCOURAGING THE PRESERVATION OF THE GUEST HOUSE & GARA GE WITHIN FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PLANS BECA USE... Page 201 of 381 girl, ILUCHE 0 Potential Motions Continued DISAPPROVAL OF THE DEMOLITION REQUEST(S)9 INFAVOR OF RECOMMENDING TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DESIGNATION OF THE SUBJECT STRUCTURE(S) WITH A RECOMMENDATION THAT THE OWNER IS ABLE TO DIVIDE THE SUBJECT PARCEL, ALLOW AN ADDITIONAL HOME, WITH THE MOTION INTENDING TO SUPPORT REASONABLE DIMENSIONAL AND DESIGN CRITERIA CONCESSIONS NECESSARY TO PRESERVE THE STRUCTURE(S) BECAUSE THE RECORD, TESTIMONY, AND EVIDENCE ESTABLISH (1) THERE IS A REAL AND PRESENT DANGER TO THE SUBJECT PROPERTY AS EVIDENCED BY THE APPLICANT'S PROPOSAL; AND (1) BASED UPON THE BEST AVAILABLE DATA, THE SUBJECT PROPERTY APPEARS ELIGIBLE FOR HISTORIC DESIGNATION AS AN EXCEPTIONAL HISTORIC RESOURCE. [see definition of exceptional historic resource on next page]. Page 202 of 381 L� C @ L3 Li 12-7 tz St. LCounty H'lstorI l ComrMss'Mn January 4, 2022 9809 South Indian River Drive Demolition Request / Historical Commission Initiated Designation Planning and Development Services Kori Benton, AICP, Historic Preservation Officer & Assistant Planning Manager Page 203 of 381 o UL'LLDt Demolition Analysis Highlights Is the structure of such interest or quality that it The subject structures generally meet the local criteria for designation as significant historic, for would reasonably meet national, state, or local Architectural Significance, context of development during WWII and the subsequent development criteria for designation as a significant historic or period. architectural site or structure? • LDC Section 4.11.06. Criteria 1. Is the structure of such design, crattsmansnip or i ne structures display a simple Wood Frame Vernacular styling ex -pressed by a by a rectangular lines, material that it could be reproduced only with great drop siding, and gable roofs, featuring composition shingles, and simple ornamental features. The difficulty or expense? structural condition has not been well documented, however the structures are presumed to be in Rood condition. Page 204 of 381 AGENDA REQUEST TO: Board of County Commissioners 8.F.1. 2022-54565 CONSENT AGENDA - SOLID WASTE & RECYCLING DATE: 2/1/2022 *ACTION ITEM - CAPITAL EQUIPMENT PURCHASE QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEM? No PRESENTED BY: Rebecca Olson, Assistant Director of Public Utilities SUBMITTED BY: Solid Waste & Recycling SUBJECT: Bid Waiver and Capital Equipment Purchase - Two eFactor3 Metso Waste Shredders St. Lucie County Solid Waste (SLCSW) requests a bid waiver per Section 8.1 (a) (3) of the purchasing manual to purchase two used Metso eFactor3 Waste Shredders (cost reduced on unit 1 by $83,839.00 because it has 721 hours and cost reduced on unit 2 by $103,841.00 because it has 1,732 hours). This would allow SLCSW to mulch yard waste and garbage in-house. SLCSW expended $671,561.72 in FY 19-20 and $502,424.51 in FY 20-21 for an outside vendor to mulch yard waste. A waste - shredder would eliminate the need for an outside vendor. A second waste shredder would allow SLCSW to shred garbage. Based on a four -month period of demonstrations, this would result in smaller, denser bales and increase garbage bale weights by an average of 1,000 pounds. This translates to 3 bales of shredded garbage for every 4 bales of un-shredded garbage. This is an airspace savings, increasing the life of the SLC Landfill. BACKGROUND: Based on research of current industry standards, SLCSW rented (and received performance demonstrations of) multiple waste shredders over the past eighteen months. With the exception of material some vendors requested not be loaded into their machines, each shredder received similar material (C&D, Yard Waste, Garbage & Tires) during these demonstrations. The eFactor3 Metso Waste Shredder efficiently processed all materials, (some that were prohibited by other vendors or their machines could not process efficiently). The outflow of material was both consistent in volume and size. The material hopper allowed for large material to be placed in the hopper without pre-processing. In addition, more than one type of equipment can be utilized for loading the hopper, which allows for flexibility in the event of staffing or equipment shortages. The Metso Shredders, at a cost of $884,151.00 (for unit 1 with a cutting table) and $665,000.00 (for unit 2) outperformed the other shredders, and long-term would be the most cost effective purchase. Page 205 of 381 SLCSW is requesting a bid waiver per Section 8.1 (a) (3) of the purchasing manual as eFactor3 has reduced the cost of unit 1 by $83,839.00 because it has 721 hours and reduced the cost of unit 2 by $103,841.00 because it has 1,732 hours. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funds will be available in Operations 401-3410-564000-340000 for this capital equipment purchase and will be moved from Reserves. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board authorize staff to purchase the two used eFactor3 Metso Waste Shredders and one cutting table for a total cost of $1,549,151.00 NIG ►] "il ►�1f F.5.11 ] -LT IeTs"I0 -LTA RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures George Landry, Director of Public Utilities Jennifer Hill, Office of Management & Budget Director Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: January 10, 2022 Date: January 12, 2022 Date: January 26, 2022 Date: January 26, 2022 Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator Page 206 of 381 Page 207 of 381 e 3J CFACTORTHRee METSO Mobile Shredder Prepared for: Greg Atkinson St. Lucie County Solid Waste FL 6120 Glade Cut Off Road Fort Pierce, FL 34981 United States (772)462-1996 atkinsong@stlucieco.org Prepared by: Hartmut Bendfeldt hbendfeldt@efactor3.com Your eFACTOR3 Representative: Sebastian Ward sward@efactor3.com 1 /24/2022 Proposal Number: HDETQ1072-01 601 Eagleton Downs Drive T 704.944.3232 Suite D F 704.944.3234 Pineville, NC 28134 www.efactor3.com Pag6 209 of 381 Application: METSO Mobile Shredder Material: MSW, Industrial and Bulky Waste, Tires and C&D Req. Volume: 10-70 Tons/hour Output capacity*: Depending on Waste Stream 90% <=12" (300mm) *The METSO Shredder output capacity depends on material properties like bulk density, type and amount of contamination, moisture content as well as feeding form, particle size of incoming stream and equipment maintenance. The Metso M&J 4000M-8 Crawler mounted machine is designed for mobile processing of a wide range of materials. The hourly shredding capacity depends on the waste stream. Following are a few capacities listed for typical waste streams processed in a landfill or transfer station: MSW C&D Bulky Waste Industrial Waste Green Waste including stumps Tires up to 85 tons/hour up to 70 tons/hour up to 60 tons/hour up to 40 tons/hour up to 70 tons/hour up to 15 tons/hour SPECIAL PRICING IS BASED ON THE EFACTOR3 USED DEMO UNIT: Serial Number 3138 Machine is a 2020 USED Demo (June 2020)unit. The unit has approximately 1,732 operating hours on it as of the proposal date. The standared warranty on this machine has expired. If an extended warranty is purchased the unit will be covered for 24 month or 4,000 operating hours from day of delivery. This means that the extended warranty will expire 24 month after delivery or at 5,732 operating hours! HDETQ1072-01 Page 2f(J§ of 381 Position 1 Metso M&J 4000M-8 Crawler Mounted Shredder 3171 (2021 Model) 1 $764,790.00 $764,790.00 M&J 4000M Crawler Mounted Metso M&J 4000M Crawler Mounted Mobile Shredder (drawing 193596) For more than 30 years Metso Denmark A/S has under the brand name M&J Shredders produced some of the strongest and most reliable pre -shredders for the international waste market. We have succeeded in developing the most versatile pre -shredder in the market. Always aiming for high capacity and durability, we now have more than 500 units installed worldwide in a wide range of applications: e.g. MSW, hazardous, industrial, bulky, wood for incineration, RDF and landfill. After sales and service is highly developed with local support worldwide, which gives us the possibility to provide you with effective, intelligent service and support 24/7/365. The M&J 4000 is by far the most popular model due to the fact that it represents the perfect balance between: investment, performance, wear and durability. HDETQ1072-01 Pag@ 2ff(§ of 381 Power Pack The drive unit of the shredder is a Caterpillar diesel engine with two hydraulic pumps that activate the 2 hydraulic motors mounted on the rotating shafts. The hydraulic system consists of a variable pump with power control, integrated feed pump and hydraulic motors mounted on each shaft. All together a state-of-the-art double hydrostatic system providing the maximum output and the most reliable performance available. Conveyor The shredder is equipped with a foldable conveyor which gives a discharge height of over 3.45 meters (136"). Crawler transport system The complete shredder is mounted on a very robust crawler system controlled by the operator with a remote control allowing for internal site transport with a speed of 2 km/h (1,24 miles/h). The shredding process and Cutting Table Start the shredder and it will run fully automatically. The rotating knives, provided with two forward and two backward cutting edges, rotate close to the counter knives. Electronic surveillance with alarms for shaft, conveyor, hydraulic oil (pressure, temperature and level), oil cooler and central lubrication are all standard functions. In case of overload, the shafts will rotate in the opposite direction, redistribute the material and continue the shredding. In order to protect the system against the effects of non shreddables, the shafts will stop automatically after changing rotation 5 times giving an alarm signal for the operator. The control system Danfoss Plus +1 includes warning signals for alarms, as well as automatic shredding routines for different material types in order to achieve the highest possible capacity in each specific type of waste. Technical Specifications with Standard Hopper Overall Length (folded conveyor) 9,392 mm (369.8") Overall Length (unfolded conveyor) 14,917 mm (587.3") Overall Width 2,950 mm (116.1") Overall Height, Loading Height 3,505 mm (138") Discharge Conveyor Length of conveyor Speed of conveyor Width of conveyor Discharge height Conveyor Inclination (foldable) 10,250 mm (404") 1.0-1.8 m/s (197-354 ft/min) 1,200 mm (47.2") 3,457 mm (138") 220 HDETQ1072-01 Pag6 2fq of 381 System includes: = Radio Remote 10 x 5 Channels = Hydraulic Oil = Analogue Pump Control = Standard Hopper (650 mm) M&J 4000M-8 Cutting Table Metso M&J 4000M-8 Cutting Table Between each set of counter knives, a free opening in the cutting table will ensure that sand, soil, gravel and small metal fragments fall straight through without causing wear in the cutting area. The central lubrication system controls the automatic lubrication of the main bearings. Size of cutting table Overall height of cutting table Opening of cutting table Depth of cutting table Internal Cutting Table Volume Cutting area: Cutting Table 4,072 x 2,300 mm (160.3" x 90.5") 1,250 mm (49.2") 3,144 x 2000 mm (123.8 x 78.7) 841 mm (33.1") 4.5 m3 (159 cuft) 2420 x 2000 mm (95.3" x 78.7") Number of Shafts: 2 with asynchronous operation Rotor: "Metso- M&J" 2-shaft cutting table (welded) Forward Tips Rotor: 2 Backward Tips Rotor: 2 Rotor Knives: 2 x 8 knives (80mm, Hardox 500) Counter Knives: 2 x 16 knives (160mm, Hardox 500) Free opening in cutting table 160 mm (6.3") Particle size: 90% <300mm (12") HDETQ1072-01 Pagg V:7 of 381 Automatic Lubrication System for Bearings: 10 g/hour Cutting Table and Cutters are Hardfaced at Manufacturing Plant! 4000M-P30 HD Caterpillar C154F PowerPack .All-- 4000M-P30 HD Caterpillar C154F PowerPack Dual Hydraulic Diesel engine Emission Class Drive system Hydraulic Motors Engine Power Diesel Tank Maximum fuel consumption Average fuel consumption AdBlue Tank AdBlue Consumption C15 tier 4F Caterpillar Tier 4 Double hydrostatic Parker Denison P30 Poclain 403 kW (540 hp) 850 liters (224.6 gallons) 85 liters/hour (22.46 gallons/hour) 60 liters/hour (15.85 gallons/hour) 45 liters (11.89 gallons) 3% of fuel consumption Oil cooling system Air Ambient temperature 45°C (113°F) Numeric control Danfoss Plus +1 Rotor Speed: 27-56 RPM Hydraulic Oil Volume: 450 liters (119 gallons) Heller 68 Speed control Analogue Noise Level 1 meter (39.4") distance 88+/-3 dB(A) 4000M Overband Magnet 8400 Gauss HDETQ1072-01 Pagg VJ of 381 Overband magnet Gauss 8400 at 250 mm (10") incl. stainless steel section on conveyor, modification of PP, hydraulic hoist and conveyor METSO Shipping 4000 Mobile DAP Customer Location. The price includes the packaging of all goods. SubTotal Position 1 790.00 Position 2 Extended warranty 24 month 4,000 hours 1 $47, 500.00 $47, 500.00 4000 Extended Warranty 24 4000 Extended Warranty for Metso 24 month or 4,000 operating hours (whichever comes first) on parts and labor (wearing parts, shipping cost, travel and other expenses excluded). During the warranty period, all wear and spare parts must be purchased from Efactor3, LLC. In addition all major services (every 1000 hours) have to be carried out by Efactor3 LLC and/or its equipment vendors. The warranty is only valid with a service contract in good standing. Customer is responsible for all wear and spare parts that are needed for the fulfillment of the service contract. Services carried out by none certified technicians will void the warranty. The use of aftermarket parts will void the warranty for the delivered equipment. Customer has to carry out ALL daily, weekly monthly base maintenance functions according to manufactures manual and instructions and maintain a log of all routine maintenance jobs with date, time and signature. HDETQ1072-01 Pagg M4 of 381 The warranty does not cover any neglect, fire or damage from foreign objects. The warranty excludes all wear items like Bearings, Rotor knives, Cutting Shafts, Cutting Tables, belts, Pumps etc. SubTotal Position 2 .00 Position 3 Special Price Reduction 1-$103,841.00-$103,841.00 Special Price Reduction for 1732 operating hours on the METSO 4000-8 M! SubTotal Position 3 -$103,841.00 Running SubTotal Position 1-3 NET .00 Position 4 Start up Assitance and Training eFACTOR3/METSO Technician Supervise mechanical and electrical testing, start-up, and training of operation and maintenance personnel (1 trip) Number of supervisor(s): 1 Number of days including travel: 3 day(s) (8 hours/day) The quoted price includes travel expenses to installation site, regular labor based on 8 working hours per day, board and lodging. The HDETQ1072-01 Pag@ V6 of 381 price does not include overtime or weekend/holiday hours and is based on a prepared installation site. All pricing is based on the installation, start-up and training taking place during the same period during regular working days and hours. If more than the proposed time or additional trips are needed to finish the start-up and training assistance the additional time, overtime, travel, board and lodging will be invoiced separately. 3 $1,900.00 $5,700.00 SubTotal Position 4 700.00 SPECIAL NET PRICE FOR POSITION 1-4 $714,149.00 Special Price Reduction Position 5 Special Price Reduction 1-$49,149.00-$49,149.00 Special Price Reduction if this unit is purchased together with METOS 4000-8 M mobile shredder (Serial Number 3171 ) and an Exchange Cutting Table. SubTotal Position 5 Running SubTotal NET Position 1-5 149.00 $665,000.00 HDETQ1072-01 Pagg 2f1�§ of 381 Payment Terms: 40% with purchase order, 50% 15 business days prior to shipment from factory, 10% net 10 days from acceptance, not to exceed 45 days from delivery. Shipping Terms: DAP Customer's Location. Delivery: 2 weeks for 3138 after receiving purchase order, down payment and final technical clarification. eFACTOR3 LLC is not responsible for delays beyond our control. Color: Electrical -Cabinet: RAL 7035 (light grey) Equipment: Manufacturer's Standard Dimensions: The machines are built to metric standards. All dimensions included herein are translated to inches from mm and not meant to reflect exact measurement. Power Supply: Main voltage: Control voltage: Diesel 24 VDC The electrical control panels are designed for installation in a dust -controlled area with continuous fresh air supply and a maximum ambient temperature of 40°C. In case of higher temperatures in the environment of the machine, it is necessary to install an air conditioning system for the electrical cabinet. (Available upon request) Installation: The price does not include any shipping, unloading, rigging, site preparation unless the service is explicitly included in the scope of supply. Customer is responsible for all field wiring. Final set-up and training assistance will be provided by certified factory technicians if included in the price. Warranty: 24 month or 5,732 hours if extended warranty is purchased, after the delivered equipment has been commissioned by a factory technician HDETQ1072-01 Pad@ 2W of 381 or another person, who has been authorized by the manufacture and/or eFACTOR3 LLC and a start-up protocol, has been signed. Implied warranty ends 24 month or 5,732 hours if extended warranty is purchased after ex works date. Warranty will be void if the equipment is operated without start up by an authorized person. The warranty does not cover any wear parts such as pumps, fuses, bearings, cutters, screens, contactors, etc. Travel and shipping cost are not covered by the warranty and are the buyer's responsibility. During the warranty period, all wear and spare parts must be purchased from eFACTOR3 LLC. In addition, all major services must be carried out by eFACTOR3 LLC and/or its equipment vendors. The use of aftermarket wear and spare parts during the warranty period might void the warranty for the delivered equipment. Services carried out by a technician that has not been authorized by eFACTOR3 will void the warranty. Customer must carry out all daily, weekly and monthly base maintenance functions according to manufactures manual and instructions and maintain a log of these routine maintenance jobs with date, time and signature. The warranty does not cover damages that are caused by neglect, fire or damage from foreign objects. Condition of Sale: All equipment listed is offered subject to eFACTOR3's General Condition of Sale. Sales tax as well as any other administrative fees is not included in the quoted price. All unloading, rigging, site preparation, electrical, water, air or dust extraction is the responsibility of the customer unless explicitly included. All acceptances of orders and payment terms are contingent upon credit approval. All quoted prices are in US $ and are subject to change prior to acceptance by the company. The US $ Pricing is based on an exchange rate of N/A. Fluctuations of the exchange rate might require a price correction prior to an order acceptance. Performance Bond and Acceptance: The acceptance of the machine has to take place at the installation site. An acceptance log is drawn up and signed by both contracting parties. The machine shall be regarded as accepted by the purchaser if the machine complies with the nominal throughputs as HDETQ1072-01 Pad4 V1 of 381 mentioned above in a performance test lasting a maximum of 2 hours. All the above -named parameters must be assured by the purchaser. Furthermore, the machine is considered accepted 2 months after delivery if the performance test is delayed for reasons for which eFACTOR3 LLC is not responsible or if above mentioned parameters change. Not included in the Scope of Supply: Any deliveries and services that are not expressly described are not included. These items in particular are also not included: 1. All energy supply services as well as safety devices installed for the supply and the return of electrical energy, air, fire extinguishing and cooling water arriving from the customer's central supply to the main connections of the installation. 2. All foundations or possibly required measures for installing the machines, such as supports, fixtures, platforms, cable conduit or channels. 3. All transportation and conveying devices for the material in -feed and discharge of the equipment. 4. All administrative permits that are required for the erection and the operation as well as all resulting impositions, including ventilation, de -dusting and sound insulation. 5. All protective and safety devices pursuant to the local provisions. 6. All field wiring. 7. Elevation Structures, Access Platforms 8. All Electrical Control Systems for Material Handling and overall line control system if equipment is part of a complete line. 9. Rigging and Installation of the equipment. Continuous Charging —Definition of Obstructing We hereby expressly advise the purchaser that the machine requires a continuous material supply to be able to achieve the specified nominal throughput. Additionally, the material must be free of foreign object/obstructing substances. HDETQ1072-01 Pads 2f'fkJ of 381 Accepted by: Greg Atkinson Date St. Lucie County Solid Waste FL Purchase Order This proposal was generated by Hartmut Bendfeldt, Prices are valid for 30 days. We reserve the right to revise other aspects of this proposal at any time. This proposal is valid without original signature provided it was sent from an eFACTOR3 employee. Technical specifications are subject to change at any time and are based on standard equipment. The equipment pictured in this document are for demonstration purposes only. They may not accurately reflect the equipment you are purchasing in whole, or in part. HDETQ1072-01 Pad@ 2f2V of 381 eFACTOR3 Rate Sheet 2020 (updated November 20, 2019) Work Hour Rates: Regular Time (Monday — Friday, Sam — 5pm) $ 135.00/hour Overtime (before Sam and after 5pm, all Saturday) $ 202.50/hour Sunday and Holiday Time $ 270.00/hour Travel Hour Rates: Regular Time (via Air and/or Rental Car) $ 95.00/hour Overtime (before Sam and after 5pm, all Saturday) $ 142.50/hour Sunday and Holiday Time $ 190.00/hour Meals/Per Diem (Only applies to overnight travel) $ 65.00/day Transportation: Company Service Truck Travel Time with hourly charge $ 0.75/Mile Flights, hotels, and rental cars will be billed upon receipt plus a 10% administrative fee Notes: • For warranty repairs or services, only parts and labor for onsite work will be provided free of charge. • Customer is responsible for all travel expenses. • Customer is responsible for return shipments of parts to manufacturing plant. • Minimum billing increments % hour • Wait time is the same as time worked • Payment terms are Net 10 • Any customer with an outstanding balance over 45 days will not be allowed to book a service call — warranty or otherwise • A Purchase Order is required for ALL Service Calls &DH_DocNo, Page 1 of 1 Pad6 12f of 381 EFACTOR3 LLC — GENERAL CONDITIONS OF SALE, ST LUCIE COUNTY (01/2022) 63V. eFACTORTH:Ree (1) CONTRACT AND ACCEPTANCE The terms and conditions of sale set forth herein, and the descriptions on the facing page hereof constitute the entire agreement between EFACTOR3 LLC (Seller) and Buyer. SELLER'S ACCEPTANCE OF THIS ORDER IS EXPRESSLY CONDITIONED BY BUYER'S ASSENT TO THE TERMS CONTAINED HEREIN. (2) PRICES AND ACCEPTANCE Unless otherwise stated in the applicable purchase order, all prices are F.O.B. Seller's plant or shipping point and do not include crating. Payment is payable in cash at Seller's place without any deductions. Charges for other forms of payment are payable by the Buyer. Initial business relations, repairs, etc., will be C.O.D. Major deliveries are payable in accordance with terms on facing page hereof. Payments due will be charged with an interest of 1.5 % per month. No deduction shall be made in the payment by the Buyer without the Seller's written acceptance hereof. (3) SHIPPING SCHEDULE AND DELIVERY Seller will establish shipping schedules as closely as practicable in accordance with Buyer's requested delivery date. However, Seller will not be responsible for deviations in meeting shipping schedules nor for any losses or damages to Buyer (or any third person) occasioned by deviations in the performance or the nonperformance of any of Seller's obligations under this contract or by loss of or damage to the product when caused directly or indirectly by or in any manner arising from any casualty, riots, acts of Buyer, strikes or other labor difficulties, shortage of labor, supplies, and transportation facility or any other similar or different cause or causes beyond SELLER'S control or the control of its suppliers or subcontractors. Seller reserves the right to ship in advance of any Buyer request dates. Seller reserves the right to make delivery in lots. Upon delivery of each lot, Seller shall have the right to immediately invoice an appropriate portion of the total selling price. Should shipment be held beyond the scheduled delivery date for the convenience of the Buyer, the Seller reserves the right to bill immediately for the goods and to charge Buyer for warehousing insurance, trucking charges and all other expenses incident to such delays. (4) CLAIMS FOR SHORTAGES Any claims for loss, breakage (obvious or concealed) are Buyer's responsibility and should be made to the carrier immediately. Seller will render Buyer reasonable assistance in securing satisfactory adjustments of such claims. Any notice of shortages or other errors must be made to Seller via phone and with fax notification within 72 hours after receipt of shipment. Failure to give such notice shall constitute unqualified acceptance and a waiver of all claims by Buyer. Risk of loss for damages to the products sold hereunder passes to Buyer upon delivery to the carrier regardless of which party pays shipping costs. (5) TRANSPORTATION CHARGES AND ALLOWANCES No freight is allowed unless stated in Seller's proposal (if any). If Seller's proposal states that freight (if any) is allowed; all prices are F.O.B. Seller's shipping point with most economical surface transportation allowed. If the quoted price includes transportation, Seller reserves the right to designate the common carrier and to ship in the manner it deems most economical. Added costs due to special routing requested by the Buyer are chargeable to the Buyer. Under no circumstances is any freight allowance which is absorbed by Seller to be deducted from the selling price. If the quoted price includes transportation, no reduction will be made in lieu thereof whether Buyer accepts shipment in factory, warehouse, freight station, or otherwise supplies its own transportation. (6) TAXES Seller's prices do not include any applicable sales, excise or similar taxes and duty. If under any law or governmental regulation now or hereafter in effect, the Seller is required to pay or collect any tax upon the products included in this order or predicated upon, measured by or arising from the sale, transportation, delivery, use or consumption of said products whether directly or indirectly, the prices to be paid by the Buyer hereunder shall be increased by the amount of such tax. Buyer agrees to pay such tax as part of the purchase price. Buyer also agrees that such payment for taxes shall be made even if Seller learns of taxes due subsequent to the delivery and receipt of final payment. (7) PRODUCT INSTALLATION Any application and/or permits required for erection and installation of SELLER'S products shall be the sole responsibility of the Buyer and shall be obtained by the Buyer. Any alteration or modification necessary to the building/foundation upon which our products are erected is the sole responsibility of the Buyer. If Seller has agreed to install the product, Seller warrants that such installation will be performed in a workmanlike manner. Buyer shall pay all costs of installation including the cost of any modifications to the Buyer's plant and equipment which is necessary to accommodate the Seller's product. Seller specifically does not warrant that such modifications will not be necessary. (8) WARRANTY The Seller warrants that the products sold hereunder conform to the descriptions on the facing page hereof and will be free from any defects in material and workmanship which become apparent under normal use, and of which Buyer gives written notice to Seller within a period of 12 months from the date of installation (not to exceed 15 month from delivery). If, within that period, the Seller receives from Buyer written notice of any alleged defect in or nonconformance of any product and if, in Seller's sole judgment, the product does not conform or is found to be defective in material or workmanship; then Buyer shall, at Seller's request, return the part or product F.O.B. Seller's shipping point and Seller, at its sole option and expense, shall repair or replace the defective or nonconforming part. Dismounting and reinstallation of defective or nonconforming parts is done at Buyer's expense. Warranty for delivery of spare parts or replacement of nonconforming parts expires when warranty for original equipment expires. Seller's sole responsibility and Buyer's exclusive remedy hereunder shall be limited to such repair or replacement. THIS WARRANTY IS EXPRESSLY IN LIEU OF AND EXCLUDES ALL OTHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, USE OR APPLICATION, AND THERE IS NO AFFIRMATION OF FACT OR REPRESENTATION WHICH EXTENDS BEYOND THE DESCRIPTIONS ON THE FACE HEREOF. The warranty of Seller does not cover and Seller makes no warranty with respect to: -failures not reported to Seller within the warranty period specified above; -failure or damage due to misapplication, abuse, improper installation or abnormal conditions of temperature, dirt, or corrosive matter; -failure due to operation either intentional or otherwise, above rate capacities or in an otherwise improper manner; -products which have been any way tampered with or altered by anyone other than an authorized representative of Seller; -product damaged in shipment or otherwise without fault of Seller; -expenses incurred by Buyer in an attempt to repair or rework any alleged defective product; and -defects in material and workmanship which are attributable to drawings and specifications provided by Buyer. (9) PATENT ISSUES If any suit or demand alleging infringement of any patent relating to the structure of the apparatus or any part thereof furnished by Seller hereunder occurs, Seller shall be notified promptly in writing by Buyer of such suit or demand and given adequate authority, information and assistance for the defense of same. Seller shall have no obligation to assume defense of any such claim, but in the event that it does exercise such right, Seller at its own option and expense shall have the right to settle such suit or demand by procuring for the Buyer the right to continue using the apparatus or part thereof furnished by Seller. Alternatively, Seller may at its expense replace the apparatus or part thereof with non - infringing apparatus, or may modify same so that it becomes noninfringing, or may remove the alleged infringing apparatus and refund the purchase price. On any apparatus or part thereof made to the Buyer's design or the design of which has been modified by the Buyer, this indemnification clause shall not apply. Seller's sole responsibility and the Buyer's exclusive remedy for any such suit or demand shall be set forth in this paragraph, and in no event shall Seller's liability under this paragraph exceed the purchase price paid by Buyer for the products. (10) SELLER'S RIGHT TO MANUFACTURE Seller in its sole discretion shall have the right to manufacture the product provided hereunder as far in advance of its estimated shipping schedule as it deems appropriate. (11) LIMITATION ON LIABILITY Seller's sole responsibility and Buyer's sole and exclusive remedy with respect to any breach of warranty under this agreement shall be limited to repair or replacement at Seller's sole option. Seller's total responsibility and liability for any and all claims, damages of any nature, losses, liability or costs of corrective efforts, including but not limited to those relating to any warranty arising out of or related to performance of this agreement or the products covered hereunder or the performance thereof shall not exceed the purchase price. In no event shall Seller be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages of any character; including but not limited to, loss of use of productive facility or equipment, lost profits, property damage, expense incurred in reliance on Seller's performance hereunder, or lost production, whether suffered by Buyer or any third party. Buyer agrees that Seller shall have no liability for any and all costs, claims, demands, either direct or indirect, incident to any property damage arising out of any cause of action based on strict liability. (12) MODIFICATION, RESCISSION AND WAIVER This contract may not be modified or rescinded nor any of its provisions waived unless such modifications, rescissions or waiver is in writing and signed by an authorized employee of Seller at its office. (13) CANCELLATION Seller and Buyer recognize that due to the uniqueness of the product(s) ordered hereunder, the calculation of damages which would result from cancellation would be difficult. Therefore, if Buyer cancels any order or causes Seller to stop performance under any order by failure to meet the payment terms of this Agreement, Buyer agrees to pay the following specific cancellation charges based on the number of days prior to scheduled delivery that written notice of cancellation is received from Buyer or that Seller notified Buyer that it is stopping performance, whichever event occurs earlier: DAYS PRIOR TO SCHEDULED DELIVERY PERCENTAGE OF LIST PRICE PAYABLE BY BUYER 180-121 days: 40%, 120-91 days: 70 % , 90-31 days: 90% 30 days or less: 100 Any delay in scheduled delivery specified by Buyer will be treated as cancellation unless specifically agreed to in writing by Seller. (14) COSTS AND EXPENSES Buyer agrees to pay Seller all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees (including those on appeal) incurred by Seller in exercising any of its rights and remedies hereunder, including specifically the collection of any outstanding balance owed to Seller by Buyer. (15) APPLICABLE LAW AND CONSENT TO JURISDICTION The performance and construction of this Agreement shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of Florida, excluding conflict of laws rules. Buyer agrees that any suit, action or proceeding instituted against either party hereto arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement shall be brought in any court of competent jurisdiction located in the state of Florida. By its execution hereof, Buyer hereby irrevocably waives any objection and any right of immunity on the ground of venue, the convenience of the forum, the jurisdiction of such courts or the execution of judgments resulting therefrom. Buyer hereby irrevocably accepts and submits to the jurisdiction of the aforesaid courts in any such suit, action or proceeding. (16) MISCELLANEOUS Seller reserves the right to furnish substitutes for material which cannot be reasonably obtained because of any restrictions, voluntarily or compulsorily established by or in connection with any governmental authority or program. Seller may during any periods of shortage due to causes beyond the control of Seller or its suppliers, prorate its supply of products among all of its Buyers in such manner as may be deemed equitable in the sole judgment of Seller. Seller shall not incur any liability to Buyer because of any proration hereunder. All orders must be accepted by an authorized employee of Seller at its office. Failure of Seller to insist in any one or more instances upon the performance of any of the terms and conditions of this contracts or the failure of Seller to exercise any of its rights hereunder shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of any such terms, conditions, or right hereunder and shall not affect Seller's right to insist upon strict performance and compliance with regard to any unexecuted portions of this contract or future performance of these terms and conditions. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between these General Conditions of Sale and the applicable purchase order, the provisions of the applicable purchase order shall prevail. Accepted by Print Name and Title Date Company 15050 Choate Circle 704-944-3232 Suite E 877-801-3232 Charlotte, NC 28273 efactor3.com P46 2Q2 of 381 e 3J CFACTORTHRee METSO Mobile Shredder Prepared for: Greg Atkinson St. Lucie County Solid Waste FL 6120 Glade Cut Off Road Fort Pierce, FL 34981 United States (772)462-1996 atkinsong@stlucieco.org Prepared by: Hartmut Bendfeldt hbendfeldt@efactor3.com Your eFACTOR3 Representative: Sebastian Ward sward@efactor3.com 1 /24/2022 Proposal Number: HDETQ1071-01 601 Eagleton Downs Drive T 704.944.3232 Suite D F 704.944.3234 Pineville, NC 28134 www.efactor3.com Pag6 2Q9 of 381 Application: METSO Mobile Shredder Material: MSW, Industrial and Bulky Waste, Tires and C&D Req. Volume: 10-70 Tons/hour Output capacity*: Depending on Waste Stream 90% <=12" (300mm) *The METSO Shredder output capacity depends on material properties like bulk density, type and amount of contamination, moisture content as well as feeding form, particle size of incoming stream and equipment maintenance. The Metso M&J 4000M-8 Crawler mounted machine is designed for mobile processing of a wide range of materials. The hourly shredding capacity depends on the waste stream. Following are a few capacities listed for typical waste streams processed in a landfill or transfer station: MSW C&D Bulky Waste Industrial Waste Green Waste including stumps Tires up to 85 tons/hour up to 70 tons/hour up to 60 tons/hour up to 40 tons/hour up to 70 tons/hour up to 15 tons/hour SPECIAL PRICING IS BASED ON THE EFACTOR3 USED DEMO UNIT: Serial Number 3171 Machine is a 2021 USED Demo (May 2021) unit. The unit has approximately 721 operating hours on it as of the proposal date. The standared warranty on the machine is 12 month or 2,000 operating hours, whichever comes first. If an extended warranty is purchased the unit will be covered for 36 month or 6,000 operating hours from day of delivery. This means that the warranty will expire after 12 month or 2,721 or 36 month or 6,721 operating hours! HDETQ1071-01 Page 2fM of 381 Position 1 Metso M&J 4000M-8 Crawler Mounted Shredder 3171 (2021 Model) 1 $764,790.00 $764,790.00 M&J 4000M Crawler Mounted Metso M&J 4000M Crawler Mounted Mobile Shredder (drawing 193596) For more than 30 years Metso Denmark A/S has under the brand name M&J Shredders produced some of the strongest and most reliable pre -shredders for the international waste market. We have succeeded in developing the most versatile pre -shredder in the market. Always aiming for high capacity and durability, we now have more than 500 units installed worldwide in a wide range of applications: e.g. MSW, hazardous, industrial, bulky, wood for incineration, RDF and landfill. After sales and service is highly developed with local support worldwide, which gives us the possibility to provide you with effective, intelligent service and support 24/7/365. The M&J 4000 is by far the most popular model due to the fact that it represents the perfect balance between: investment, performance, wear and durability. HDETQ1071-01 Pag@ 1:29 of 381 Power Pack The drive unit of the shredder is a Caterpillar diesel engine with two hydraulic pumps that activate the 2 hydraulic motors mounted on the rotating shafts. The hydraulic system consists of a variable pump with power control, integrated feed pump and hydraulic motors mounted on each shaft. All together a state-of-the-art double hydrostatic system providing the maximum output and the most reliable performance available. Conveyor The shredder is equipped with a foldable conveyor which gives a discharge height of over 3.45 meters (136"). Crawler transport system The complete shredder is mounted on a very robust crawler system controlled by the operator with a remote control allowing for internal site transport with a speed of 2 km/h (1,24 miles/h). The shredding process and Cutting Table Start the shredder and it will run fully automatically. The rotating knives, provided with two forward and two backward cutting edges, rotate close to the counter knives. Electronic surveillance with alarms for shaft, conveyor, hydraulic oil (pressure, temperature and level), oil cooler and central lubrication are all standard functions. In case of overload, the shafts will rotate in the opposite direction, redistribute the material and continue the shredding. In order to protect the system against the effects of non shreddables, the shafts will stop automatically after changing rotation 5 times giving an alarm signal for the operator. The control system Danfoss Plus +1 includes warning signals for alarms, as well as automatic shredding routines for different material types in order to achieve the highest possible capacity in each specific type of waste. Technical Specifications with Standard Hopper Overall Length (folded conveyor) 9,392 mm (369.8") Overall Length (unfolded conveyor) 14,917 mm (587.3") Overall Width 2,950 mm (116.1") Overall Height, Loading Height 3,505 mm (138") Discharge Conveyor Length of conveyor Speed of conveyor Width of conveyor Discharge height Conveyor Inclination (foldable) 10,250 mm (404") 1.0-1.8 m/s (197-354 ft/min) 1,200 mm (47.2") 3,457 mm (138") 220 HDETQ1071-01 Pag6 2f,* of 381 System includes: = Radio Remote 10 x 5 Channels = Hydraulic Oil = Analogue Pump Control = Standard Hopper (650 mm) M&J 4000M-8 Cutting Table Metso M&J 4000M-8 Cutting Table Between each set of counter knives, a free opening in the cutting table will ensure that sand, soil, gravel and small metal fragments fall straight through without causing wear in the cutting area. The central lubrication system controls the automatic lubrication of the main bearings. Size of cutting table Overall height of cutting table Opening of cutting table Depth of cutting table Internal Cutting Table Volume Cutting area: Cutting Table 4,072 x 2,300 mm (160.3" x 90.5") 1,250 mm (49.2") 3,144 x 2000 mm (123.8 x 78.7) 841 mm (33.1") 4.5 m3 (159 cuft) 2420 x 2000 mm (95.3" x 78.7") Number of Shafts: 2 with asynchronous operation Rotor: "Metso- M&J" 2-shaft cutting table (welded) Forward Tips Rotor: 2 Backward Tips Rotor: 2 Rotor Knives: 2 x 8 knives (80mm, Hardox 500) Counter Knives: 2 x 16 knives (160mm, Hardox 500) Free opening in cutting table 160 mm (6.3") Particle size: 90% <300mm (12") HDETQ1071-01 Pagg 12f of 381 Automatic Lubrication System for Bearings: 10 g/hour Cutting Table and Cutters are Hardfaced at Manufacturing Plant! 4000M-P30 HD Caterpillar C154F PowerPack .All-- 4000M-P30 HD Caterpillar C154F PowerPack Dual Hydraulic Diesel engine Emission Class Drive system Hydraulic Motors Engine Power Diesel Tank Maximum fuel consumption Average fuel consumption AdBlue Tank AdBlue Consumption C15 tier 4F Caterpillar Tier 4 Double hydrostatic Parker Denison P30 Poclain 403 kW (540 hp) 850 liters (224.6 gallons) 85 liters/hour (22.46 gallons/hour) 60 liters/hour (15.85 gallons/hour) 45 liters (11.89 gallons) 3% of fuel consumption Oil cooling system Air Ambient temperature 45°C (113°F) Numeric control Danfoss Plus +1 Rotor Speed: 27-56 RPM Hydraulic Oil Volume: 450 liters (119 gallons) Heller 68 Speed control Analogue Noise Level 1 meter (39.4") distance 88+/-3 dB(A) 4000M Overband Magnet 8400 Gauss HDETQ1071-01 Pagg 1:26 of 381 Overband magnet Gauss 8400 at 250 mm (10") incl. stainless steel section on conveyor, modification of PP, hydraulic hoist and conveyor METSO Shipping 4000 Mobile DAP Customer Location. The price includes the packaging of all goods. SubTotal Position 1 790.00 Position 2 Extended warranty 36 month 6,000 hours 1 $47, 500.00 $47, 500.00 4000 Extended Warranty 36 6000 Extended Warranty for Metso 36 month or 6,000 operating hours (whichever comes first) on parts and labor (wearing parts, shipping cost, travel and other expenses excluded). During the warranty period, all wear and spare parts must be purchased from Efactor3, LLC. In addition all major services (every 1000 hours) have to be carried out by Efactor3 LLC and/or its equipment vendors. The warranty is only valid with a service contract in good standing. Customer is responsible for all wear and spare parts that are needed for the fulfillment of the service contract. Services carried out by none certified technicians will void the warranty. The use of aftermarket parts will void the warranty for the delivered equipment. Customer has to carry out ALL daily, weekly monthly base maintenance functions according to manufactures manual and instructions and maintain a log of all routine maintenance jobs with date, time and signature. HDETQ1071-01 Pagg 126 of 381 The warranty does not cover any neglect, fire or damage from foreign objects. The warranty excludes all wear items like Bearings, Rotor knives, Cutting Shafts, Cutting Tables, belts, Pumps etc. SubTotal Position 2 .00 Position 3 Special Price Reduction 1-$83,839.00-$83,839.00 Special Price Reduction Special Price Reduction for 721 operating hours on the METSO 4000-8 M! SubTotal Position 3 .00 Running SubTotal Position 1-3 NET .00 Position 4 Start up Assitance and Training eFACTOR3/METSO Technician Supervise mechanical and electrical testing, start-up, and training of operation and maintenance personnel (1 trip) Number of supervisor(s): 1 Number of days including travel: 3 day(s) (8 hours/day) The quoted price includes travel expenses to installation site, regular labor based on 8 working hours per day, board and lodging. The HDETQ1071-01 Pag@ 2fM of 381 price does not include overtime or weekend/holiday hours and is based on a prepared installation site. All pricing is based on the installation, start-up and training taking place during the same period during regular working days and hours. If more than the proposed time or additional trips are needed to finish the start-up and training assistance the additional time, overtime, travel, board and lodging will be invoiced separately. 3 $1,900.00 $5,700.00 SubTotal Position 4 SPECIAL NET PRICE FOR POSITION 1-4 700.00 $734,151.00 Position 5 M&J 4000-8 Spare Exchange Cutting Table 1 $179,000.00 $179,000.00 4000S-8 Spare Cutting Table M&J 4000-8 Exchange Cutting table Machine Opening: 123.8" x 78.7" (3,144mm x 2,000mm) Cutting Table Height / Volume: 33.1" (841 mm)/4.5m3 Cutting Zone: 95.3" x 78.7" (2,420mm x 2,000mm) Number of Shafts: 2 with asynchronous operation Rotor: "Metso- M&J" 2-shaft cutting table (welded) Forward Tips Rotor: 2 Backward Tips Rotor: 2 Rotor Knives: 2 x 8 knives (80mm, Hardox 500) Counter Knives: 2 x 16 knives (160mm, Hardox 500) Particle size: 90% <300mm Automatic Lubrication System for Bearings: 10 g/hour Weight of Table: 27,500-32,780 lbs. (12,500-14,900 kg) THE EXCHANGE CUTTING TABLE IS DELIVERED WITHOUT MAIN BEARINGS AND HYDRAULIC MOTORS HDETQ1071-01 Pagg 2flf of 381 SubTotal 79,000.00 Special Price Reduction Position 6 Special Price Reduction 1-$29,000.00-$29,000.00 Special Price Reduction for Cutting table if purchased together with METSO M&J 4000-8 with Serial number 3171 SubTotal Position 6 Running SubTotal Position 1-6 NET .00 151.00 HDETQ1071-01 Pad@ 2fl:� of 381 Payment Terms: 40% with purchase order, 50% 15 business days prior to shipment from factory, 10% net 10 days from acceptance, not to exceed 45 days from delivery. Shipping Terms: DAP Customer's Location. Delivery: 2-3 weeks for 3171, 18-20 weeks for Cutting Table after receiving purchase order, down payment and final technical clarification. eFACTOR3 LLC is not responsible for delays beyond our control. Color: Electrical -Cabinet: RAL 7035 (light grey) Equipment: Manufacturer's Standard Dimensions: The machines are built to metric standards. All dimensions included herein are translated to inches from mm and not meant to reflect exact measurement. Power Supply: Main voltage: Control voltage: Diesel 24 VDC The electrical control panels are designed for installation in a dust -controlled area with continuous fresh air supply and a maximum ambient temperature of 40°C. In case of higher temperatures in the environment of the machine, it is necessary to install an air conditioning system for the electrical cabinet. (Available upon request) Installation: The price does not include any shipping, unloading, rigging, site preparation unless the service is explicitly included in the scope of supply. Customer is responsible for all field wiring. Final set-up and training assistance will be provided by certified factory technicians if included in the price. Warranty: 36 month or 6,721 hours if extended warranty is purchased, otherwise 12 month or 2,350 hours, after the delivered equipment has been commissioned by a factory technician or another person, HDETQ1071-01 Pad4 2fJJ of 381 who has been authorized by the manufacture and/or eFACTOR3 LLC and a start-up protocol, has been signed. Implied warranty ends 36 month or 6,721 hours if extended warranty is purchased, otherwise 12 month or 2,350 hours after ex works date. Warranty will be void if the equipment is operated without start up by an authorized person. The warranty does not cover any wear parts such as pumps, fuses, bearings, cutters, screens, contactors, etc. Travel and shipping cost are not covered by the warranty and are the buyer's responsibility. During the warranty period, all wear and spare parts must be purchased from eFACTOR3 LLC. In addition, all major services must be carried out by eFACTOR3 LLC and/or its equipment vendors. The use of aftermarket wear and spare parts during the warranty period might void the warranty for the delivered equipment. Services carried out by a technician that has not been authorized by eFACTOR3 will void the warranty. Customer must carry out all daily, weekly and monthly base maintenance functions according to manufactures manual and instructions and maintain a log of these routine maintenance jobs with date, time and signature. The warranty does not cover damages that are caused by neglect, fire or damage from foreign objects. Condition of Sale: All equipment listed is offered subject to eFACTOR3's General Condition of Sale. Sales tax as well as any other administrative fees is not included in the quoted price. All unloading, rigging, site preparation, electrical, water, air or dust extraction is the responsibility of the customer unless explicitly included. All acceptances of orders and payment terms are contingent upon credit approval. All quoted prices are in US $ and are subject to change prior to acceptance by the company. The US $ Pricing is based on an exchange rate of N/A. Fluctuations of the exchange rate might require a price correction prior to an order acceptance. Performance Bond and Acceptance: The acceptance of the machine has to take place at the installation site. An acceptance log is drawn up and signed by both contracting parties. The machine shall be regarded as accepted by the HDETQ1071-01 Pads 2f3W of 381 purchaser if the machine complies with the nominal throughputs as mentioned above in a performance test lasting a maximum of 2 hours. All the above -named parameters must be assured by the purchaser. Furthermore, the machine is considered accepted 2 months after delivery if the performance test is delayed for reasons for which eFACTOR3 LLC is not responsible or if above mentioned parameters change. Not included in the Scope of Supply: Any deliveries and services that are not expressly described are not included. These items in particular are also not included: 1. All energy supply services as well as safety devices installed for the supply and the return of electrical energy, air, fire extinguishing and cooling water arriving from the customer's central supply to the main connections of the installation. 2. All foundations or possibly required measures for installing the machines, such as supports, fixtures, platforms, cable conduit or channels. 3. All transportation and conveying devices for the material in -feed and discharge of the equipment. 4. All administrative permits that are required for the erection and the operation as well as all resulting impositions, including ventilation, de -dusting and sound insulation. 5. All protective and safety devices pursuant to the local provisions. 6. All field wiring. 7. Elevation Structures, Access Platforms 8. All Electrical Control Systems for Material Handling and overall line control system if equipment is part of a complete line. 9. Rigging and Installation of the equipment. Continuous Charging —Definition of Obstructing We hereby expressly advise the purchaser that the machine requires a continuous material supply to be able to achieve the specified nominal throughput. Additionally, the material must be free of foreign object/obstructing substances. HDETQ1071-01 Pad@ 2fJ6 of 381 Accepted by: Greg Atkinson Date St. Lucie County Solid Waste FL Purchase Order This proposal was generated by Hartmut Bendfeldt, Prices are valid for 30 days. We reserve the right to revise other aspects of this proposal at any time. This proposal is valid without original signature provided it was sent from an eFACTOR3 employee. Technical specifications are subject to change at any time and are based on standard equipment. The equipment pictured in this document are for demonstration purposes only. They may not accurately reflect the equipment you are purchasing in whole, or in part. HDETQ1071-01 Pad6 2f,:* of 381 eFACTOR3 Rate Sheet 2020 (updated November 20, 2019) Work Hour Rates: Regular Time (Monday — Friday, Sam — 5pm) $ 135.00/hour Overtime (before Sam and after 5pm, all Saturday) $ 202.50/hour Sunday and Holiday Time $ 270.00/hour Travel Hour Rates: Regular Time (via Air and/or Rental Car) $ 95.00/hour Overtime (before Sam and after 5pm, all Saturday) $ 142.50/hour Sunday and Holiday Time $ 190.00/hour Meals/Per Diem (Only applies to overnight travel) $ 65.00/day Transportation: Company Service Truck Travel Time with hourly charge $ 0.75/Mile Flights, hotels, and rental cars will be billed upon receipt plus a 10% administrative fee Notes: • For warranty repairs or services, only parts and labor for onsite work will be provided free of charge. • Customer is responsible for all travel expenses. • Customer is responsible for return shipments of parts to manufacturing plant. • Minimum billing increments % hour • Wait time is the same as time worked • Payment terms are Net 10 • Any customer with an outstanding balance over 45 days will not be allowed to book a service call — warranty or otherwise • A Purchase Order is required for ALL Service Calls &DH_DocNo, Page 1 of 1 Pads 2flf of 381 EFACTOR3 LLC — GENERAL CONDITIONS OF SALE, ST LUCIE COUNTY (01/2022) 63V. eFACTORTH:Ree (1) CONTRACT AND ACCEPTANCE The terms and conditions of sale set forth herein, and the descriptions on the facing page hereof constitute the entire agreement between EFACTOR3 LLC (Seller) and Buyer. SELLER'S ACCEPTANCE OF THIS ORDER IS EXPRESSLY CONDITIONED BY BUYER'S ASSENT TO THE TERMS CONTAINED HEREIN. (2) PRICES AND ACCEPTANCE Unless otherwise stated in the applicable purchase order, all prices are F.O.B. Seller's plant or shipping point and do not include crating. Payment is payable in cash at Seller's place without any deductions. Charges for other forms of payment are payable by the Buyer. Initial business relations, repairs, etc., will be C.O.D. Major deliveries are payable in accordance with terms on facing page hereof. Payments due will be charged with an interest of 1.5 % per month. No deduction shall be made in the payment by the Buyer without the Seller's written acceptance hereof. (3) SHIPPING SCHEDULE AND DELIVERY Seller will establish shipping schedules as closely as practicable in accordance with Buyer's requested delivery date. However, Seller will not be responsible for deviations in meeting shipping schedules nor for any losses or damages to Buyer (or any third person) occasioned by deviations in the performance or the nonperformance of any of Seller's obligations under this contract or by loss of or damage to the product when caused directly or indirectly by or in any manner arising from any casualty, riots, acts of Buyer, strikes or other labor difficulties, shortage of labor, supplies, and transportation facility or any other similar or different cause or causes beyond SELLER'S control or the control of its suppliers or subcontractors. Seller reserves the right to ship in advance of any Buyer request dates. Seller reserves the right to make delivery in lots. Upon delivery of each lot, Seller shall have the right to immediately invoice an appropriate portion of the total selling price. Should shipment be held beyond the scheduled delivery date for the convenience of the Buyer, the Seller reserves the right to bill immediately for the goods and to charge Buyer for warehousing insurance, trucking charges and all other expenses incident to such delays. (4) CLAIMS FOR SHORTAGES Any claims for loss, breakage (obvious or concealed) are Buyer's responsibility and should be made to the carrier immediately. Seller will render Buyer reasonable assistance in securing satisfactory adjustments of such claims. Any notice of shortages or other errors must be made to Seller via phone and with fax notification within 72 hours after receipt of shipment. Failure to give such notice shall constitute unqualified acceptance and a waiver of all claims by Buyer. Risk of loss for damages to the products sold hereunder passes to Buyer upon delivery to the carrier regardless of which party pays shipping costs. (5) TRANSPORTATION CHARGES AND ALLOWANCES No freight is allowed unless stated in Seller's proposal (if any). If Seller's proposal states that freight (if any) is allowed; all prices are F.O.B. Seller's shipping point with most economical surface transportation allowed. If the quoted price includes transportation, Seller reserves the right to designate the common carrier and to ship in the manner it deems most economical. Added costs due to special routing requested by the Buyer are chargeable to the Buyer. Under no circumstances is any freight allowance which is absorbed by Seller to be deducted from the selling price. If the quoted price includes transportation, no reduction will be made in lieu thereof whether Buyer accepts shipment in factory, warehouse, freight station, or otherwise supplies its own transportation. (6) TAXES Seller's prices do not include any applicable sales, excise or similar taxes and duty. If under any law or governmental regulation now or hereafter in effect, the Seller is required to pay or collect any tax upon the products included in this order or predicated upon, measured by or arising from the sale, transportation, delivery, use or consumption of said products whether directly or indirectly, the prices to be paid by the Buyer hereunder shall be increased by the amount of such tax. Buyer agrees to pay such tax as part of the purchase price. Buyer also agrees that such payment for taxes shall be made even if Seller learns of taxes due subsequent to the delivery and receipt of final payment. (7) PRODUCT INSTALLATION Any application and/or permits required for erection and installation of SELLER'S products shall be the sole responsibility of the Buyer and shall be obtained by the Buyer. Any alteration or modification necessary to the building/foundation upon which our products are erected is the sole responsibility of the Buyer. If Seller has agreed to install the product, Seller warrants that such installation will be performed in a workmanlike manner. Buyer shall pay all costs of installation including the cost of any modifications to the Buyer's plant and equipment which is necessary to accommodate the Seller's product. Seller specifically does not warrant that such modifications will not be necessary. (8) WARRANTY The Seller warrants that the products sold hereunder conform to the descriptions on the facing page hereof and will be free from any defects in material and workmanship which become apparent under normal use, and of which Buyer gives written notice to Seller within a period of 12 months from the date of installation (not to exceed 15 month from delivery). If, within that period, the Seller receives from Buyer written notice of any alleged defect in or nonconformance of any product and if, in Seller's sole judgment, the product does not conform or is found to be defective in material or workmanship; then Buyer shall, at Seller's request, return the part or product F.O.B. Seller's shipping point and Seller, at its sole option and expense, shall repair or replace the defective or nonconforming part. Dismounting and reinstallation of defective or nonconforming parts is done at Buyer's expense. Warranty for delivery of spare parts or replacement of nonconforming parts expires when warranty for original equipment expires. Seller's sole responsibility and Buyer's exclusive remedy hereunder shall be limited to such repair or replacement. THIS WARRANTY IS EXPRESSLY IN LIEU OF AND EXCLUDES ALL OTHER EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, USE OR APPLICATION, AND THERE IS NO AFFIRMATION OF FACT OR REPRESENTATION WHICH EXTENDS BEYOND THE DESCRIPTIONS ON THE FACE HEREOF. The warranty of Seller does not cover and Seller makes no warranty with respect to: -failures not reported to Seller within the warranty period specified above; -failure or damage due to misapplication, abuse, improper installation or abnormal conditions of temperature, dirt, or corrosive matter; -failure due to operation either intentional or otherwise, above rate capacities or in an otherwise improper manner; -products which have been any way tampered with or altered by anyone other than an authorized representative of Seller; -product damaged in shipment or otherwise without fault of Seller; -expenses incurred by Buyer in an attempt to repair or rework any alleged defective product; and -defects in material and workmanship which are attributable to drawings and specifications provided by Buyer. (9) PATENT ISSUES If any suit or demand alleging infringement of any patent relating to the structure of the apparatus or any part thereof furnished by Seller hereunder occurs, Seller shall be notified promptly in writing by Buyer of such suit or demand and given adequate authority, information and assistance for the defense of same. Seller shall have no obligation to assume defense of any such claim, but in the event that it does exercise such right, Seller at its own option and expense shall have the right to settle such suit or demand by procuring for the Buyer the right to continue using the apparatus or part thereof furnished by Seller. Alternatively, Seller may at its expense replace the apparatus or part thereof with non - infringing apparatus, or may modify same so that it becomes noninfringing, or may remove the alleged infringing apparatus and refund the purchase price. On any apparatus or part thereof made to the Buyer's design or the design of which has been modified by the Buyer, this indemnification clause shall not apply. Seller's sole responsibility and the Buyer's exclusive remedy for any such suit or demand shall be set forth in this paragraph, and in no event shall Seller's liability under this paragraph exceed the purchase price paid by Buyer for the products. (10) SELLER'S RIGHT TO MANUFACTURE Seller in its sole discretion shall have the right to manufacture the product provided hereunder as far in advance of its estimated shipping schedule as it deems appropriate. (11) LIMITATION ON LIABILITY Seller's sole responsibility and Buyer's sole and exclusive remedy with respect to any breach of warranty under this agreement shall be limited to repair or replacement at Seller's sole option. Seller's total responsibility and liability for any and all claims, damages of any nature, losses, liability or costs of corrective efforts, including but not limited to those relating to any warranty arising out of or related to performance of this agreement or the products covered hereunder or the performance thereof shall not exceed the purchase price. In no event shall Seller be liable for any special, indirect, incidental or consequential damages of any character; including but not limited to, loss of use of productive facility or equipment, lost profits, property damage, expense incurred in reliance on Seller's performance hereunder, or lost production, whether suffered by Buyer or any third party. Buyer agrees that Seller shall have no liability for any and all costs, claims, demands, either direct or indirect, incident to any property damage arising out of any cause of action based on strict liability. (12) MODIFICATION, RESCISSION AND WAIVER This contract may not be modified or rescinded nor any of its provisions waived unless such modifications, rescissions or waiver is in writing and signed by an authorized employee of Seller at its office. (13) CANCELLATION Seller and Buyer recognize that due to the uniqueness of the product(s) ordered hereunder, the calculation of damages which would result from cancellation would be difficult. Therefore, if Buyer cancels any order or causes Seller to stop performance under any order by failure to meet the payment terms of this Agreement, Buyer agrees to pay the following specific cancellation charges based on the number of days prior to scheduled delivery that written notice of cancellation is received from Buyer or that Seller notified Buyer that it is stopping performance, whichever event occurs earlier: DAYS PRIOR TO SCHEDULED DELIVERY PERCENTAGE OF LIST PRICE PAYABLE BY BUYER 180-121 days: 40%, 120-91 days: 70 % , 90-31 days: 90% 30 days or less: 100 Any delay in scheduled delivery specified by Buyer will be treated as cancellation unless specifically agreed to in writing by Seller. (14) COSTS AND EXPENSES Buyer agrees to pay Seller all costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney's fees (including those on appeal) incurred by Seller in exercising any of its rights and remedies hereunder, including specifically the collection of any outstanding balance owed to Seller by Buyer. (15) APPLICABLE LAW AND CONSENT TO JURISDICTION The performance and construction of this Agreement shall be governed by the internal laws of the State of Florida, excluding conflict of laws rules. Buyer agrees that any suit, action or proceeding instituted against either party hereto arising out of or in any way related to this Agreement shall be brought in any court of competent jurisdiction located in the state of Florida. By its execution hereof, Buyer hereby irrevocably waives any objection and any right of immunity on the ground of venue, the convenience of the forum, the jurisdiction of such courts or the execution of judgments resulting therefrom. Buyer hereby irrevocably accepts and submits to the jurisdiction of the aforesaid courts in any such suit, action or proceeding. (16) MISCELLANEOUS Seller reserves the right to furnish substitutes for material which cannot be reasonably obtained because of any restrictions, voluntarily or compulsorily established by or in connection with any governmental authority or program. Seller may during any periods of shortage due to causes beyond the control of Seller or its suppliers, prorate its supply of products among all of its Buyers in such manner as may be deemed equitable in the sole judgment of Seller. Seller shall not incur any liability to Buyer because of any proration hereunder. All orders must be accepted by an authorized employee of Seller at its office. Failure of Seller to insist in any one or more instances upon the performance of any of the terms and conditions of this contracts or the failure of Seller to exercise any of its rights hereunder shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment of any such terms, conditions, or right hereunder and shall not affect Seller's right to insist upon strict performance and compliance with regard to any unexecuted portions of this contract or future performance of these terms and conditions. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency between these General Conditions of Sale and the applicable purchase order, the provisions of the applicable purchase order shall prevail. Accepted by Print Name and Title Date Company 15050 Choate Circle 704-944-3232 Suite E 877-801-3232 Charlotte, NC 28273 efactor3.com P48116 of 381 �tc LUCE 0 - , AGENDA REQUEST TO: Board of County Commissioners PRESENTED BY: George Landry, Director of Public Utilities SUBMITTED BY: Utilities SUBJECT: Utilities Division Purchase of Vehicles BACKGROUND: 8.F.2. 2021-54531 CONSENT AGENDA - UTILITIES DATE: 2/1/2022 *ACTION ITEM - BOARD APPROVAL QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEM? No In March 2021 the Utilities Division of the Public Utilities Department assumed operation of all water and wastewater plants and facilities. As a result, the Division increased staffing to 19 FTE upon receiving Board approval. Subsequently, the Board approved three (3) additional FTE staff members to manage the maintenance improvement and capital growth needs of the Utilities Division. The staffing growth has resulted in a need to increase the size of the Utilities Division's fleet of vehicles. Therefore, Utilities is requesting Board approval for a capital vehicle expenditure, to purchase two additional light duty trucks with necessary security equipment and lighting packages. Based on the current price quote, the total cost of these two (2) vehicles is $143,418. N/A FINANCIAL IMPACT: Funds in the amount of $143,418 will be transferred from Fund 479 Reserves, 479-9910-599300-910000, and made available in Fund 479 Machinery & Equipment, 479-3600-564000-360000. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the proposed purchase of new vehicles and capital expenditure in the amount of $143,418.00. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None Page 239 of 381 NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures Date: January 13, 2022 George Landry, Director of Public Utilities Date: January 13, 2022 Office of Management and Budget Date: January 13, 2022 Jennifer Hill, Office of Management & Budget Director Wi. ?' Date: January 17, 2022 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: January 18, 2022 Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator Date: January 19, 2022 Alphonso Jefferson, Deputy County Administrator Date: January 24, 2022 Howard Tipton, County Administrator Page 240 of 381 or wwnl I V 0 a ro - W-A-/ A 0 r - Sou rcewell F'.0- Farm [y NJPA Awarded Contract Call Us first, for all of your Fleet Automotive, & Light Truck needs. Quote PHONE (800) ALANJAY (252-6529) DIRECT 863-385-9610 WWW.ALANJAY.COM 34802-1 Urporate 2003 U.S. 27 South MOBILE 904-838-4999 Mailing P.O.BOX9200 ice Sebring, FL 33870 FAX 863-402-4221 Address Sebring, FL 33871-9200 ORIGINAL1190T021ATE QUICK QUOTE SHEET REVISED12202E DATE REQUESTING AGENCY CONTACT PERSON PHONE ST LUCIE COUNTY PAT WALSH EMAIL WALSHP(a)STLUCIECO.ORG 772-462-1847 MOBILE 772-999-1531 FAX SOURCEWELL (FORMERLY NJPA) CONTRACT # 2022 120716-NAF & 060920-NAF www.NationalAutoFleetGroup.com MODEL F313 610A MSRP $40,960.00 2022 FORD F-350 REGULAR CAB SRW 4WD XL 8' BED 142" WB CUSTOMER ID BASE VEHICLE PRICE $31,209.00 BED LENGTH 8' BED ** All vehicles will be ordered white w/ darkest interior unless clearly stated otherwise on purchase order. FACTORY OPTIONS DESCRIPTION Z1 AS EXTERIOR COLOR OXFORD WHITE WITH MEDIUM EARTH GRAY HD VINYL 40/20/40 SPLIT BENCH SEAT INCLUDES $0.00 CENTER ARMREST WITH CUPHOLDERS, STORAGE, AND DRIVERS SIDE MANUAL LUMBAR. 996 44G Engine: 6.2L 2-Valve SOHC EFI NA V8 Flex -Fuel, Transmission: TorgShift 10-Speed Automatic $0.00 -- - ------ 153 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FRONT LICENSE PLATE BRACKET -------------------- $0.00 5213 ELECTRIC BRAKE CONTROLLER $265.00 66D Pickup Box Delete -inc: Deletes tie -down hooks, tailgate, rearview camera, 7/4 pin connector and center high -mounted ($300.00) stop lamp (CHMSL) (only on vehicles over 10,000 Ibs, GVWR), Incomplete vehicle package - requires further manufacture and certification by a final stage manufacturer, In addition, Ford urges manufacturers to follow the recommendations of the Ford Incomplete Vehicle Manual and the Ford Truck Body Builder's Layout Book (and applicable supplements), Rear Bumper Delete, Spare Wheel, Tire, Carrier & Jack Delete *CREDIT* 872 Rear View Camera & Prep Kit $410.00 -inc: Pre -installed content includes cab wiring, frame wiring to the rear most cross member and video display w/4" display, Upfitters kit includes camera w/mounting bracket, 14' jumper wire and camera mounting, aiming instructions and electrochromic mirror 90L Power Equipment Group $910.00 -inc: Deletes passenger side lock cylinder, upgraded door -trim panel, Accessory Delay, Advanced Security Pack, SecuriLock Passive Anti -Theft System (PATS) and inclination/intrusion sensors, MyKey, owner controls feature, Power Locks, Remote Keyless Entry, Folding Trailer Tow Mirrors w/Power Heated Glass, manual telescoping, heated convex spotter mirror and integrated clearance lamps/turn signals, Power Front Side Windows, 1-touch up/down driver/passenger window FACTORY OPTIONS $1,285.00 CONTRACT OPTIONS DESCRIPTION NO -TEMP TEMP TAG NOT REQUESTED, CUSTOMER WILL HANDLE THEIR OWN TAG WORK. $0.00 CAMERA-F Dealer installed factory ordered camera (REQUIRES 872). $195.00 K 696J Knapheide 8' SRW utility body for 56" CA (Includes 2nd Stage MSO, Weight Slip, & Completed Vehicle Certification.) $7,675.00 EC3200-LD Stellar 32001b EH 11,500 ft. lb. crane with hydraulic extension 7 - 11ft, manual extension 11- 15 ft, adj boom rest 18 - $20,680.00 26" 150 amp circuit breaker, single side spring build up, crane reinforcement, manual outriggers, and additional battery in crane compartment. K CLV-SB Class V Hitch for Service Body $590.00 K 7/4 WIRE 7 way flat camper trailer wiring with 4 prong flat $155.00 K VA CONTRACTOR VANAIR 14HP KOHLER 5KW PEAK AC GENERATOR 4.2KW CONTINUOUS 20 CFM RECIPROCATING COMPRESSOR 30 GAL. $6,120.00 AIR STORAGE 1.9 GAL. FUEL STORAGE BATTERY INCLUDED K HR50 Hose reel with 50' x 3/8" air hose mounted on reinforced compartment top, specify mounting location. $1,080.00 HD USOB-TB HD Scorpion spray on bed liner applied inside cargo area, tops of boxes, and rear bumper of 8' & 9' utility body. $1,085.00 FS RSLTRK-AW Federal Signal Road Side Lighting Package includes 2 Micropulse LED's (Split Amber/White) in Grille, 2 Micropulse LED's $1,635.00 (Split Amber/White) mounted to rear tail gate with white bezel, 1 eight head Amber Signal Master stick installed inside ----------------------- back glass, 1 Compact Digital Soft Button 6 switch controller. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------- CONTRACT OPTIONS $39,215.00 NJPA-ST LUCIE COUNTY-F3B 610A_34802-1_Quote.PDF Page 1 of 2 Page 241 of 381 go WW-IAAW, 4 9 W-/ F/Owc Sou rcewell F'.0 Formerly NJPA A%q"rriPd Cnntrart SOURCEWELL (FORMERLY NJPA) CONTRACT # 2022 120716-NAF & 060920-NAF www.NationalAutoFleetGroup.com VEHICLE TOTAL $32.494.00 MSRP DISCOUNT 23.1% ACCESSORY TOTAL S39.215.00 TRADE IN CUSTOMER PRICE $71,709.00 YES WE TAKE TRADE INS --- ASK ABOUT MUNICIPAL FINANCING--- —1 $0.00 TOTAL COST LESS TRADE IN(S) QTY 2 $143,418.00 Estimated Annual payments for 60 months paid in advance: $16,059.87 Extended: $32,119.73 Municipal finance for any essential use vehicle, requires lender approval, WAC. Comments VEHICLE QUOTED BY CHRISTY SELF GOVERNMENT ACCOUNT MANAGER christv.self(dalaniay.com "9 Want to be Your Fleet Provider" I appreciate the opportunity to submit this quotation. Please review it carefully. If there are any errors or changes, please feel free to contact me at any time. I am always happy to be of assistance. NJPA-ST LUCIE COUNTY-F3B 610A_34802-1_Quote.PDF Page 2 of 2 Page 242 of 381 AGENDA REQUEST TO: Board of County Commissioners 8.G.1. 2022-54599 CONSENT AGENDA - PUBLIC WORKS DATE: 2/1/2022 *ACTION ITEM - BOARD APPROVAL QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEM? No PRESENTED BY: Daniel Zrallack, County Engineer SUBMITTED BY: Public Works SUBJECT: Commons at Oleander - Payment In Lieu of Sidewalk Construction BACKGROUND: The applicant received Site Plan approval through the County on February 10, 2021. The project is located at 3801 Oleander Avenue. Per section 7.05.04.A.1: All residential developments required to obtain site plan approval located within the Urban Service Boundary and all non-residential development above 6,000 square feet located within the unincorporated area of St. Lucie County and within the Urban Service Boundary are required to design and construct sidewalks within the right-of-way of all streets and roadways that abut or lie within the perimeter of the property. Commercial Circle is a County roadway, and the developer is required to construct concrete sidewalks with the right-of-way of all abutting streets. The applicant has requested that the sidewalk requirement be waived. Per Section 7.05.04.A.4.h, The Board of County Commissioners shall authorize total or partial relief from the requirements of sidewalk construction if it finds, after receiving the recommendation of the Development Review Committee and based on conditions peculiar to the proposed development, that the proposed sidewalk construction is not in the best interest of the County, the applicant shall pay a fee -in -lieu to the County for sidewalk and/or greenways and trails construction. If the fees are not used to design, acquire needed right-of-way or construct sidewalks within ten (10) years from the date of payment, the developer may request a refund. The applicant has provided a cost estimate for the fee -in -Lieu for construction. The Oleander Avenue sidewalk would be 6 feet wide by 87 linear feet, resulting in a total cost of $2,436.00. Please see the attached aerial map and cost estimate from the applicant's engineer for reference. PREVIOUS ACTION: The applicant received Site Plan approval through the County on February 10, 2021 Page 243 of 381 FINANCIAL IMPACT: The County would accept the funds in the amount of $2,436.00 and will place it into the County's sidewalk program, account #101-4115-324320-4906. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval of the fee -in -lieu of construction agreement with Florida Treasure Coast Holdings, LLC, accept funds in the amount of $2,436.00 and authorization for the Chair to sign documents as approved by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures Date: January 12, 2022 Daniel Zrallack, County Engineer Date: January 13, 2022 Patrick Dayan, Public Works Assistant Director Date: January 13, 2022 Don West, Public Works Director Date: January 13, 2022 Jennifer Hill, Office of Management & Budget Director Date: January 13, 2022 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: January 18, 2022 Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator Page 244 of 381 AGREEMENT TO PAY FEE IN LIEU OF CONSTRUCTING CONCRETE SIDEWALKS THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 2021, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("County") and FLORIDA TREASURE COAST HOLDINGS, LLC ("Developer"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, Developer intends to construct a project to be known as Commons at Oleander (the "Development"); and WHEREAS, the Developer cannot construct concrete sidewalks at the project location due to site conditions. WHEREAS, the Developer agrees to pay to the County two thousand four hundred thirty six dollars ($2,436.00) as payment in lieu of constructing the required concrete sidewalks at the project location. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties covenant and agree as follows: Within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Agreement, the Developer shall deliver to the County funds in the amount of $2,436.00 (the "Funds"). The Funds delivered to the County shall be used for design and construction of sidewalks at locations as determined by the County. The Funds are nonrefundable. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be made and entered into the day and year first above written. ATTEST: BY: Deputy Clerk BY: BY: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Chair APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney By: k V""V tA- Print Name: Larry McDonald Title: President -I- Page 245 of 381 lip Legend ��ke ,, e Y1�k�• �1�, 5 hr ' �el�;,l'r .•r 5 FJ I r A �y �1P� '��y I � , � . ► 1 1 14. { ` 1 I Alg!41 I, T' r •. � �Y y �1�1 i 1 1 h 1 { i1' V �l I it r, Goy Ie Earth •' T�.-� �' ������ -�'�;���� K���;� .m��� '���������� -�, +>, l uG� A SEPH W. JODAH8.BSLE,P.E,P.E. SCHULKE BITTLE & STODDARD L.L.C. JODAH B. BITTLE, P.E. f , WILLIAM P. STODDARD, Ph.D., P.E. CIVIL & STRUCTURAL ENGINEERING • LAND PLANNING • ENVIRONMENTAL PERMITTING Commons at Oleander Sidewalk Cost Estimate for Fee in Lieu Description Unit Quantity Unit Price Total Sidewalk SY 58 $42.00 $2,436.00 Total Fee in Lieu: $2,436.00 I hereby certify that the total amount of the cost estimate prepared by Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard, LLC is sufficient for the sidewalk at the Commons at Oleander project. Date: A '} 1717 INDIAN RIVER BLVD., SUITE 201 VERO BEACH, FLORIDA 32960 TEL 772 / 770-9622 FAX 772 / 770-9496 EMAIlLinfo@sbsengineers.com Page 247 of 381 TO: PRESENTED BY SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: AGENDA REQUEST Board of County Commissioners Jodi Nentwick, Senior Planner Planning & Development Services 9.A.1. 2022-54614 PUBLIC HEARINGS - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DATE: 2/1/2022 *RESOLUTION ITEM - CONDITIONAL USE QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEM? Yes Seaside (Ouanalao) Resort - Major Adjustment to Conditional Use Permit - THIS ITEM IS QUASI-JUDICIAL The applicant, Lee Heaton of Seaside 20 LLC. and representative, Lee Dobbins, Esq., Dean, Mead, Minton & Moore, have applied for a Major Adjustment to the existing Seaside (aka Ouanalao) Resort Conditional Use Permit to amend the owner's length of stay restrictions for the project located at 7700 S. Ocean Drive, St Lucie County, Florida. The project site is located both east and west of Ocean Drive (SR-A1A South) approximately five (5) miles north of North Causeway Boulevard (Jensen Beach Causeway, Frank Wacha Bridge). The undeveloped 15.40-acre petition site is located within the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District, with land east of SR A1A holding an RM (Residential, Medium) Future Land Use Designation and properties west of SR A1A have an RU (Residential, Urban) Future Land Use Designation. The project site is located within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). PREVIOUS ACTION: On July 6, 2021, the Board of County Commissioners granted approval (Resolution 2021-306) for a conditional use permit to develop a tourist court resort and alcohol waiver for on -premises consumption of less than one thousand six hundred (1,600) feet of an existing public park as an accessory to a tourist court resort pursuant to Section 7.10.11(A). Additionally, the Board of County Commissioners grant approval (Resolution 2021-312) for the Major Site Plan for a 37,000 square foot tourist court resort containing twenty-five (25) oceanside villas and twenty-five (25) internal cottages, clubhouse amenity center with restaurant and bar, and accessory dock with twenty (20) slips, associated parking, drainage, and utility infrastructure. The amendment will not require any modifications to the approved site plan. Page 248 of 381 FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board adopt the attached resolution approving this request for a major adjustment to the conditional use permit, subject to the conditions outlined in Resolution No. 2022-23. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures Date: January 23, 2022 Benjamin Balcer, Planning & Development Services Assistant Director Date: January 24, 2022 Leslie Olson, Planning & Development Services Director =/011 Date: January 24, 2022 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: January 26, 2022 Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator Page 249 of 381 eTir-O CEE0 0 P L I I i TO: Board of County Commissioners Planning and Development Services Department Planning Division MEMORANDUM THROUGH: Leslie Olson, AICP, Director Benjamin Balcer, AICP, Assistant Planning Director FROM: Jodi Kugler-Nentwick, Senior Planner DATE: January 20, 2022 SUBJECT: Seaside (AKA Ouanalao) Resort Major Adjustment to Conditional Use Permit (CUMJ-11202126233) GENERAL INFORMARION: Owner/Applicant: Lee Heaton Seaside 20 LLC 277 Royal Poinciana Way #156 Palm Beach, FL 33480 Representative: Lee Dobbins, Esq. Dean, Mead, Minton & Moore 1903 S. 25 h Street Fort Pierce, FL 34947 Location: 7700 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, 34957 Zoning District: HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Future Land Use(s): RM (Residential, Medium - 9 du/1 acre) RU (Residential, Urban — 5 du/1 acre) Parcel ID Number(s): 3522-343-0001-000-3, 3522-344-0001-000-6, 3522-344-0002-000-3, 3522-342-0002-000-7 Site Size: 15.40-acres Proposal: Amend Condition of Approval: Owner's length of stay requirement Existing: Undeveloped - Approved Active Approvals: Conditional Use & Major Site Plan for a fifty (50) unit Tourist Court Resort with clubhouse, restaurant and accessory docking facility (20 slips) Urban Service Boundary (USB): Located inside the Urban Service Boundary (USB) ST. LUCIE WORKS Page 250 of 381 Project Name: Seaside (AKA Ouanalao) Resort File No. CUMj-11202126233 BACKGROUND: The applicant, Lee Heaton of Seaside 20 LLC. and representative, Lee Dobbins, Esq., Dean, Mead, Minton & Moore, have applied for a Major Adjustment to the existing Seaside (aka Ouanalao) Resort Conditional Use Permit to amend the owner's length of stay restrictions for the project located at 7700 S. Ocean Drive, St Lucie County, Florida. The project site is located both east and west of Ocean Drive (SR-AlA South) approximately five (5) miles north of North Causeway Boulevard (Jensen Beach Causeway, Frank Wacha Bridge). The undeveloped 15.40-acre petition site is located within the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District, with land east of SR A I A holding an RM (Residential, Medium) Future Land Use Designation and properties west of SR AIA have an RU (Residential, Urban) Future Land Use Designation. The project site is located within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). Prior Action On July 6, 2021, the Board of County Commissioners granted approval (Resolution 2021-306) for a conditional use permit to develop a tourist court resort and alcohol waiver for on -premises consumption of less than one thousand six hundred (1,600) feet of an existing public park as accessory to a tourist court resort pursuant to Section 7.10.11(A). Additionally, the Board of County Commissioners grant approval (Resolution 2021-312) for the Major Site Plan for a 37,000 square foot tourist court resort containing twenty-five (25) oceanside villas and twenty-five (25) internal cottages, clubhouse amenity center with restaurant and bar, and accessory dock with twenty (20) slips, associated parking, drainage, and utility infrastructure. The amendment will not require any modifications to the approved site plan. Request The proposed amendment to Condition Number 3 to revise the unit owner's length of stay restriction as provided in Table 1, below. ST. LUCIE WORKS 2 Page 251 of 381 Project Name: Seaside (AKA Ouanalao) Resort File No. CUMj-11202126233 Table 1, Proposed Amendment in underline and sail eugh format: Approved Condition Proposed Amendment Owners of the resort units, (villas and cottages) shall not stay in their units for more than 185 calendar days per year. All resort units (villages and cottages) must be placed in the rental program run by resort management and made available for rental by the public when the owner of the unit is not staying the unit. Owners the of resoi4 unit (villas and cottages) shall o* stay in their- • its for- than 185 r more alend days per-eaf. No less than 70% of all room nights G 8,250, in any calendar year shall be offered to the public (not the unit owner) for rent. Upon request from the County, but no sooner than 30 days after the end of any calendar year, the management of the resort shall provide the County with a report confirming the foregoing condition was satisfied for the previous year. All resort units (villages and cottages) must be placed in the rental program run by resort management and made available for rental by the public when the owner of the unit is not staying the unit. STAFF ANALYSIS In accordance with St. Lucie County Land Development Code (LDC) Section 11.07.05(2)(b)(1), a Major Adjustment to a Conditional Use may be granted only upon approval by the Board of County Commissioners. The proposed Major Adjustment to an existing Conditional Use condition to amend the owner's length of stay restrictions. STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMITS AS SET FORTH IN LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11.07.03 The St. Lucie County Land Development Code (LDC) Sections 11.07.03 establishes the Standards for Review for Conditional Use Permits. Approval shall be granted only if the applicant demonstrates the following: A. Consistency with Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan The Development Review Committee has reviewed the proposed Conditional Use Adjustment, finding it to be consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code (LDC) and Comprehensive Plan. The Board of County Commissioners granted a Conditional Use Permit for a Tourist Court Resort in accordance with LDC Section 3.01.03 AA. 6. b. (1) which provides "Hotel, motel, resort, rooming and boarding houses, tourist court, and time-share or transient lodgingfacilities with rooms or dwelling units used for occupancies of less than four (4) weeks, provided that the number of rooms does not exceed the residential densities set forth in Section 7. of this Section, as an eligible Conditional Use. LDC Section 2.00.00. defines Hotel/Motel as "a building in which lodging is provided or offered to the public for compensation, generally with occupancies of less than four (4) weeks, provided however, that the foregoing limitation on occupancy shall not apply to condominium hotel units. " LDC Section 2.00.00. defines Transient Lodging Facilities as "Structures with units or rooms generally used for occupancies of less than four (4) weeks including without limitations hotels/motels, time-share facilities and tourist courts. " The project density/intensity will remain, consistent with the current Zoning District and Future Land Use designation as detailed below in Section B. There will be no increase in density with the Conditional Use ST. LUCIE WORKS Page 252 of 381 Project Name: Seaside (AKA Ouanalao) Resort File No. CUMj-11202126233 amendment. The proposed modification maintains emphasis on providing lodging accommodations within the resort, proposing that "No less than 70% of all room nights (18,250) in any calendar year shall be offered to the public (not the unit owner) for rent", maintaining that all resort units be placed in the rental program run by resort management and made available for rental by the public when the owner of the unit is not staying in the unit. The proposal also offers provisions for reporting compliance to the County. Comprehensive Plan: The property located east of SR AlA holds a RM (Residential, Medium) Future Land Use Designation and property located west of SR AlA has an RU (Residential, Urban) Future Land Use Designation. The Residential Medium (RM) land use category is to be applied to those areas that are within, or planned to be within, areas of central community services. A maximum residential density of nine (9) dwelling units per gross acre is permitted under this land use designation. If required, the actual density is subject to the satisfactory completion of the rezoning process, which would include complete review of the physical suitability of the property for development at the proposed intensity. Limited nonresidential uses may be appropriate, in accordance with applicable standards and restrictions as set forth in the Land Development Code. Medium density residential land uses can act as a transition between the lower intensity RU areas and the more intense land use designations. Zoning applications within the RM land use area include single-family, multifamily, or PD zoning. Residential Urban (RU) is predominant residential land use category in the County. This residential land use category provides for a maximum density of five (5) dwelling units per gross acre. The RU designation is generally found between the identified urban service areas and the transitional RS areas. These properties need to be serviced with central water and wastewater services. These services may be provided by either a public utility or through private on -site facilities, as would be permitted in accordance with all applicable regulations. New development in the RUareas can occur using traditional single-family or multifamily zoning designations or through the planned unit development process. Limited nonresidential uses may be appropriate, in accordance with applicable standards and restrictions as set forth in the Land Development Code. The modified Conditional Use continues to support the following Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies. Objective 1.1.12: Coastal Resources. St. Lucie County shall continue to protect and manage the unique coastal resources of the County, balancing the need to provide reasonable private property use while assuring a full range of public beach access and recreational facilities for the residents of and visitors to the County. Policy 1.1.12.2 — The County shall continue to enforce the provisions of the Hutchinson Island Residential District. In accordance with the regulations of the Hutchinson Island Residential District, as described in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the maximum hotel/motel density may not exceed the maximum residential densities set forth through the Future Land Use designations, as determined on land above mean high water. Policy 1.1.12.4 — The County shall explore regulatory incentives and criteria that encourage the preservation of viable water -dependent support facilities, such as public lodging establishments and boat hauling and repairing and commercial fishing facilities, and in maintaining the availability of public access to the navigable waters of the state, in accordance with Section 342.07, F.S. ST. LUCIE WORKS 4 Page 253 of 381 Project Name: Seaside (AKA Ouanalao) Resort File No. CUMj-11202126233 Goal 10.4: Maintain and expand the tourism sector of St. Lucie County's economy. Policy 10.4.1.4 - Promote the expansion of eco-tourism and encouraging existing and new hotels to participate in the Florida Green Lodging Program. The approved density, or correlating intensity, as well as the modified operational requirement comply with the Goals, Policies, and Objectives and site's Future Land Use Designations, within the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, as provided above in Section A. B. Effect on Nearby Properties The proposed Condition of Approval modification is not anticipated to have an affect on nearby properties. The project's physical form, design and operational structure will remain the same, while providing greater flexibility for unit owners. The purpose of the Hutchinson Island Residential District (HIRD) is to provide a residential environment on North and South Hutchinson Island that is respectful of the natural resources and value of the barrier islands and can be supported by available public andprivate services. HIRD is intended to ensure that the intensity, location, and timing of new residential growth and development is of a character that can be served by adequate public and private facilities, and that protects, preserves, and enhances the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County, Hutchinson Island constitutes a unique and valuable public resource that plays a vital role in defining the County's economic and geographic character. HIRD is intended to facilitate growth and development of the barrier islands while conserving the natural and human values the islands represent. Given the environmentally sensitive nature of barrier islands, HIRD is designed to ensure that growth and development is clustered away from environmentally sensitive lands and is limited to the more tolerant upland portions of Hutchinson Island. HIRD is also intended to implement and be consistent with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Adjacent Zoning & Future Land Uses: Location Zoning District Future Land Use Existing Land Use Subject Property HIRD (Hutchinson Island RM (Residential, Medium) Vacant Residential District)RU (Residential, Urban) Ocean Bay Beachside Park & HIRD Preserve (eastside) North (Hutchinson Island RM (Residential, Medium) Pelican Pointe Single -Family Residential District) RU (Residential, Urban) Subdivision (westside) Ocean Bay Riverside Preserve & Utility Hub Adjacent HIRD RM (Residential, Medium) Parcels South (Hutchinson Island (Residential, Urban) Vacant Residential District)RU East Atlantic Ocean Atlantic Ocean Atlantic Ocean West Indian River Lagoon Indian River Lagoon Pelican Pointe Single -Family & Indian River Lagoon C. Adequacy of Public Facilities The proposed Conditional Use Adjustment is not expected to create additional demands on public facilities, allowing maintenance of the adopted Level of Service (LOS) Standards as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan. The site is located within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). ST. LUCIE WORKS Page 254 of 381 Project Name: Seaside (AKA Ouanalao) Resort File No. CUMj-11202126233 Water/Wastewater: The site will be served by Fort Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) for water and St. Lucie County Utilities (SLC) for wastewater. A standard development agreement is underway to reserve capacity for this project. D. Adequacy of Fire Protection The site will be served by Fire Station #8 — 7583 S. Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach which is located at approximately one -quarter mile northwest of the subject site. E. Environmental Impact Back rground The Environmental Resources Department (ERD) is in receipt of the November 15, 2021 date -stamped submittal from Planning and Development Services. The applicant requests approval of a Major Adjustment to a Conditional Use to amend Condition of Approval number 3 of the recorded approval order, Resolution 2021- 306, for the oceanfront resort known as Seaside Resort (aka Ouanalao Resort). The Major Site Plan (MJSP- 12202025912) was approved and recorded July 23, 2021 (Resolution No. 2021-312) to construct a resort with 25 villas adjacent to the ocean, 25 cottages, and resort amenities such as a clubhouse which will include a conference room, restaurant with indoor and outdoor seating, a fitness facility, and a pool, along with associated parking and stormwater infrastructure, and landscaping. The subject site has a previously approved Major Site Plan and Conditional Use known as Tesoro Beach Club (Resolution 05-137), recorded on June 15, 2006. The property has approximately 1,198 linear feet of Atlantic Ocean frontage and 710 linear feet of Indian River Lagoon frontage. The +/- 15.40-acre project site is located on South Hutchinson Island at TBD South AIA, approximately 3.5 miles north of the Martin County line. Findings The proposed Major Adjustment to a Conditional Use is not anticipated to have any undue adverse environmental impacts. An Environmental Impact Report consistent with LDC 11.02.09.A.5 was provided for the Major Site Plan approval and included an assessment of onsite habitats, listed species surveys, and details regarding avoidance and minimization of impacts to natural resources. No intact native habitats will be impacted, as the proposed development area consists primarily of disturbed lands which were cleared as part of the previously approved Tesoro Major Site Plan. The remaining native habitat within the dune preservation zone will continue to be preserved and managed in perpetuity as detailed in the protective conservation easement in favor of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP, recorded in ORB 2424, Page 292) and associated Preserve Area Monitoring and Management Plan (PAMMP). The developer provided an updated Conservation Easement, including an updated PAMMP and Dune Restoration Plan, recorded September 24, 2021, Official Record Book (ORB) 4691 Pages 454-474. An Affidavit to record the Sea Turtle Protection Plan (STPP) was completed October 8, 2021, ORB 4699 Pages 1982-2000. Recommendation The Environmental Resources Department has no objection to the approval of the Major Adjustment to a Conditional Use. CONCLUSION Staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, is in substantial conformity with the original Conditional Use approval, and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The proposal will retain the balance of conditions provided in Resolution 2021-306. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board adopt the attached resolution approving this request for a Major Adjustment to the Conditional Use Permit, subject to the conditions outlined in Resolution No. 2022-23. ST. LUCIE WORKS Page 255 of 381 • Division Agenda Item Summary �o LUC E BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS �+ Hearing Date SEASIDE (aka Ouanalao) RESORT February 1, 2022 Proposed Major Adjustment to Conditional Use Permit Proaerty Owner/ADalicant: Lee Heaton Seaside 20, LLC 2777 Royal Poinciana Way, Suite 156 Palm Beach, FL 33480 Proiect Location: 7700 S. Ocean Drive Jensen Beach, FL 34951 Future Land Use: RM (Residential, Medium) east side RU (Residential, Urban) west side Existing Zonin_q: HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Parcel ID Number(s): 3522-343-0001-000-3 3522-344-0001-000-6 3522-344-0002-000-3 3522-342-0002-000-7 Staff Recommendation: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the Major Adjustment to the Condi- tional Use Permit outlined in Reso- lution 2022-23. Project Planner: Jodi Nentwick-Kugler Senior Planner Planning & Development Services Department (772) 462-1580 NentwickJ@stlucieco.org sort Project Description The applicant, Lee Heaton of Seaside 20 LLC. and representative, Lee Dobbins, Esq., Dean, Mead, Minton & Moore, have applied for a Major Adjustment to the existing Seaside (aka Ouanalao) Resort Conditional Use Permit to amend the owner's length of stay restrictions for the project located at 7700 S. Ocean Drive, St Lucie County, Florida. Prior Action On July 6, 2021, the Board of County Commissioners granted approval (Resolution 2021-306) for a conditional use permit to develop a tourist court re- sort and alcohol waiver for on -premises consumption of less than one thousand six hundred (1,600) feet of an existing public park as accessory to a tourist court resort pursuant to Section 7.10.11 (A). Additionally, the Board of County Com- missioners grant approval (Resolution 2021-312) for the Major Site Plan for a 37,000 square foot tourist court resort containing twenty-five (25) oceanside villas and twenty-five (25) internal cot- tages, clubhouse amenity center with restaurant and bar, and accessory dock with twenty (20) slips, associated park- ing, drainage, and utility infrastructure. The amendment will not require any modifications to the approved site plan. Public Comment Received: On January 21, 2022 sixteen (16) pub- lic notices were sent to adjacent prop- erty owners within 500 feet of the sub- ject parcels and sign was placed on the property. Notice Requirements: Public hearing notice was placed in the St. Lucie News Tribune on January 22, 2022, letters were sent to all property owners located within 500 feet of the subject property, and a sign was placed on the property. Further details can be found in the staff report. Page 256 of 381 Resolution 2022-23 File No. CUMj-11202126233 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A MAJOR ADJUSTMENT TO AN APPROVED CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE SEASIDE (AKA OUANALAO) RESORT TO AMEND THE OWNER'S LENGTH OF STAY RESTRICTIONS FOR THE PROJECT WITHIN THE HUTCHINSON ISLAND RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT (HIRD) ZONING DISTRICT LOCATED AT 7700 S. OCEAN DRIVE IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to findings in the staff report, has made the following determinations: Seaside 20, LLC presented a petition for a Major Adjustment to an Approved Conditional Use Permit to for the tourist court resort to be known as Seaside (AKA Ouanalao) Resort, approved for twenty-five (25) oceanside villas and twenty-five (25) internal cottages, restaurant and bar, clubhouse, pool, fitness room and accessory dock with twenty (20) slips on the west side of SR A1A, within the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District, on a +/- 15.40-acre parcel of land located at 7700 S. Ocean Drive in Jensen Beach as legally described in Paragraph C and depicted on the attached map as Exhibit "A". 2. On July 6, 2021, this Board approved Resolution 2021-306, granting a Conditional Use Permit to for the tourist court resort to be known as Seaside (AKA Ouanalao) Resort, with conditions, after holding a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, at which all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard. 3. The proposed Major Adjustment to the approved Conditional Use Permit for the Seaside (AKA Ouanalao) Resort, seek to modify a condition of approval, #3 of Resolution 2021- 306, by eliminating the restriction that resort unit owners shall not stay in their units for more than 185 calendar days per year, replacing the preceding restriction with the requirement that "No less than 70% of all room nights (18,250) in any calendar year shall be offered to the public (not the unit owner) for rent." while maintaining that all resort units be placed in the rental program run by resort management and made available for rental by the public when the owner of the unit is not staying in the unit and adding provisions for reporting compliance to the County, as displayed in Paragraph B below. 4. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the proposed Major Adjustment and found it to be in substantial conformity with the existing Conditional Use. 5. St. Lucie County Planning and Development Services staff has performed the required land use analysis for this application. 6. On February 1, 2022, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 7. The Major Adjustment to an existing Conditional Use Permit, with the conditions therein, is/is not consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. File No.: CUMj-11202126233 Resolution No. 2022-23 Page 1 Page 257 of 381 8. The project, with restated and amended conditions therein, will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. 9. The proposed project will be serviced by adequate public facilities and services. 10. The Certificate of Capacity as required under Chapter V, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, granted with Resolution 2021-306 will remain. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. The foregoing findings are hereby approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida. B. Pursuant to Sections 11.07.03 & 11.07.04, Conditional Uses, and Section 3.01.03.AA.6.b.(1) of the Land development Code, the Conditional Use Permit for Seaside 20, LLC for the project known as Seaside (AKA Ouanalao) Resort, approved by Resolution 2021-306, on for the property described in Paragraph C, and shown on the drawings for the project prepared by HJA Design Studio, LLC. dated June 21, 2021, and date stamped received by the Planning and Development Services Department on June 21, 2021, is hereby Adjusted and subject to the revised (#3) and restated conditions (1- 2 & 4-18) as follows: Planning & Development Services Department — Planning Division The tourist court resort shall be limited to twenty-five (25) 3-story resort villas, twenty-five (25) one 1-story resort cottages, with an approximate 37,000 sq. ft. clubhouse containing up to 20,000 sq. ft. of air-conditioned space. The clubhouse will include restaurant and bar space up to 7,200 sq. ft. (indoor and outdoor dining), banquet hall, ballroom, fitness room, spa, kids' playroom pool area, and other amenities. The resort includes an accessory dock on the west side of SR AM with twenty (20) slips. 2. A Unity of Title will be required prior to the issuance of a development permit. The Declaration of Condominium, consistent with the Conditions of Approval and acceptable to the County Attorney, shall be recorded prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy. 3. Owners of the resort units, (villas and GOttages) shall not stay On their units for more t 185 GaleR ap days nor No less than 70% of all room nights (18,250) in any calendar year shall be offered to the public (not the unit owner) for rent. Upon request from the County, but no sooner than 30 days after the end of any calendar year, the management of the resort shall provide the County with a report confirming the foregoing condition was satisfied for the previous near. All resort units (villages and cottages) must be placed in the rental program run by resort management and made available for rental by the public when the owner of the unit is not staying the unit. 4. The resort units within this project are not intended to qualify for the Florida Homestead property tax exemption. Owners of the resort units (villa unit and cottage units) may not declare their units as their homestead for the purpose of obtaining the Florida Homestead Property Tax Exemption. 5. A conditional use permit modification and new zoning compliance is required to transfer resort ownership. A change of management entity operating the resort, management entities or restaurant/bar operations require a new zoning compliance certificate File No.: CUMj-11202126233 Page 2 Resolution No. 2022-23 Page 258 of 381 demonstrating consistency with the conditional use permit. Individual villa or cottages sales under the Master Condominium Association will not require a Conditional Use modification. 6. Prior to issuance of a Site Development permit, a Photometric Plan compliant with the Sea Turtle Protection Plan shall be provided for the main guest and clubhouse parking areas. 7. No parking is permitted at any time along Ocean Drive (SR A1A). 8. The restaurant kitchen shall be operable and available to serve patrons when alcoholic beverages are sold or dispensed for on -premises consumption. 9. The resort activities shall comply with the St. Lucie County Land Development, Article V. Noise Control. 10. The accessory dock and water amenities are available only to registered resort guests. 11. No liveaboards are permitted to occupy any vessel on a temporary, permanent, or overnight basis. 12. No commercial fueling facilities or sewage pump -out stations shall be permitted. 13. No commercial activities, dock slip rental or selling of individual docks shall be permitted. Environmental Resources Department 14. Prior to issuance of a Vegetation Removal Permit or Exemption, listed species surveys, including not limited to gopher tortoise surveys, shall be updated as required per state and./or federal survey protocol. Should any listed species be found as a result of these updated surveys appropriate permits from state and federal agencies shall be required. 15. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all Category I listed invasive plant species shall be eradicated from the site. 16. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for each building, all seaward and shore -perpendicular facing windows and doors shall be fitted with tinted glass or film with a visible light transmittance value of forty-five (45) percent or less. A registered Florida architect or engineer shall conduct a nighttime survey with all of the beachfront lighting turned on and provide a report of the inspection to the Environmental Resources Department as outlined in the approved Sea Turtle Protection Plan. If any violations of the sea turtle lighting code are identified a Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued until all violations have been corrected. 17. Prior to issuance of a Vegetation Removal Permit or Exemption, the developer shall provide an updated executed Conservation Easement, approved Preserve Area Monitoring and Management Plan (PAMMP), Dune Restoration Plan and Sea Turtle Protection Plan (STPP) as applicable with an attached affidavit and cashier's check (payable to the Clerk of the Court for recording fees) to the County Attorney. The applicant shall also provide a GIS shapefile or CAD file of the conservation easement boundaries to St. Lucie County. A copy of a standard Conservation Easement can be found on the St. Lucie County Environmental Resources Department website at: http://www.stlucieco.gov/pdfs/Conservation Easement Form.pdf. File No.: CUMj-11202126233 Page 3 Resolution No. 2022-23 Page 259 of 381 18. Prior to issuance of a permit for the docking facility, updated seagrass surveys along with an updated EIR reflecting avoidance and minimization of impacts to aquatic resources shall be provided to the Environmental Resources Department. If surveys indicate further avoidance and minimization of impacts is necessary, an adjustment to the site plan will be required. C. The property on which this Major Adjustment to a Conditional Use Permit is being granted is described as follows: Legal Description: PARCEL 1 SUBPARCEL A: BEING A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 5,767.86 FEET NORTHERLY (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES) FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 27 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; ON THE NORTH BY A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 6,323.74 FEET NORTHERLY (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES) FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 27; ON THE WEST BY THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD A-1A; AND ON THE EAST BY THE WATERS OF THE ATLANTIC OCEAN. SUBPARCEL B: NONEXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL A ABOVE, OVER AND ACROSS THE LAND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT C TO THE GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 979, PAGE 831, AS AMENDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1525, PAGE 1559, AS FURTHER AMENDED AND RESTATED IN THE AMENDED AND RESTATED GRANT OF EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1710, PAGE 172, ALL BEING RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED BY THAT CERTAIN FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 8, 2006, IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2652, PAGE 1920, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2: A TRACT OF LAND EXTENDING FROM THE ATLANTIC OCEAN TO THE INDIAN RIVER BEING DESCRIBED AS THE NORTH 189.66 FEET OF THE SOUTH 509.94 FEET OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MEASURING 200 FEET ALONG THE ATLANTIC OCEAN AND BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS BEING THE NORTH 189.66 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY:A TRACT OF LAND IN SECTIONS 22 AND 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, LYING AND BEING IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 4470 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 27, MEASURED ON THE PERPENDICULAR, AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 5767.86 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 27, MEASURED ON THE PERPENDICULAR, AND LYING BETWEEN THE WATERS OF THE INDIAN RIVER AND THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, LESS RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE ROAD A-1-A; ALSO DESCRIBED AS THE NORTH 787.09 FEET OF SAID SECTION 27, AND THE SOUTH 509.04 FEET OF SAID SECTION 22, LESS RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE ROAD A-1-A. File No.: CUMj-11202126233 Page 4 Resolution No. 2022-23 Page 260 of 381 PARCFI 3- THE NORTH 141.89 FEET OF THE SOUTH 320.28 FEET OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY THE WATER OF THE INDIAN RIVER AND ON THE EAST BY THE WATERS OF THE ATLANTIC OCEAN. PARCFI 4- A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED ON HUTCHINSON ISLAND, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA EXTENDING FROM THE ATLANTIC OCEAN TO THE INDIAN RIVER BEING DESCRIBED AS THE SOUTH 178.39 FEET OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, AND THE NORTH 59.06 FEET OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, MEASURING 250 FEET ALONG THE ATLANTIC OCEAN. Parcel I D#s: 3522-343-0001-000-3, 3522-344-0001-000-6, 3522-344-0002-000-3, 3522-342-0002-000-7 D. The approvals and authorizations granted by this Resolution are for the purpose of developing a tourist court resort within St. Lucie County, and are not assigned to any other party or institution. Should the petitioners choose or decide to assign this operation to another entity or individual, a minor adjustment to the Conditional Use Permit shall be required. E. The approvals and authorizations granted by this Resolution are for the purpose of obtaining a Building Permit or Zoning Compliance from St. Lucie County, and are not assigned to any other party or institution. Should the applicant choose or decide to assign this business to another entity or individual, an adjustment to this Conditional Use Permit shall be required. F. Pursuant to Section 11.07.05(I) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a Conditional Use Permit, and Adjustments thereof, shall be valid for the purposes of securing a Building Permit or Certificate of Zoning Compliance for twelve (12) months from the date of this approval, unless a Building Permit or Certificate of Zoning Compliance is secured within twelve (12) months, and construction subsequently undertaken pursuant to such Building Permit, the Conditional Use Permit shall automatically expire unless the permit is extended upon application to the Board of County Commissioners. G. Pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, time limitations imposed on a Conditional Use Permit by Section 11.07.05(I) may be extended by the Board of County Commissioners not more than one (1) time, and for not more than twenty- four (24) months, upon application by the applicant and after a public hearing held in accordance with Section 11.00.04. H. The St. Lucie County Planning and Development Services Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this Resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this Resolution. I. The developer is advised as part of this Conditional Use Permit Adjustment, including any successors in interest, the developer shall obtain all applicable development permits and construction authorizations from the appropriate state and federal and local regulatory agencies including, but not limited to, the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and South Florida Water Management District, and File No.: CUMj-11202126233 Resolution No. 2022-23 Page 5 Page 261 of 381 the St. Lucie County Environmental Resources and Building Departments prior to the commencement of any development activities on the property described in Paragraph "C". Issuance of this permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the developer to obtain a permit from a State or Federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of this permit if the developer fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertake actions that may result in a violation of State or Federal law. J. The St. Lucie County Planning and Development Services Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. K. This Resolution shall become effective upon the date indicated below. An appeal of the Board of County Commissioners' action may be processed within thirty (30) days in accordance with Section 11.11.02.F, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. L. This Resolution shall be recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. M. Adoption After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Sean Mitchell, Chair XXX Frannie Hutchinson, Vice -Chair XXX Chris Dzadovsky, Commissioner XXX Linda Bartz, Commissioner XXX Cathy Townsend, Commissioner XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 1st day of February, 2022. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLOIRDA BY Chair ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: DEPUTY CLERK COUNTY ATTORNEY File No.: CUMj-11202126233 Page 6 Resolution No. 2022-23 Page 262 of 381 Exhibit "A" (Location Map) EMIDWAY RD 5 Y 2 i 2 Subject m A JQW ZParcel rn a' , EASY-ST a a J a J TIL-TON•RD DYER-RD uuui Atlantic Ocean Indian River Lagoon OO {� l SE•WAL-TON•RD G SE TIFFANYAVE y 0 a z Gs z LU qjL S 1� File No.: CUMj-11202126233 Page 7 Resolution No. 2022-23 Page 263 of 381 LL UJCffll 71 , ST. LUCIE COUNTY >� Planning $ Development , p t Services Department Submission email: Planning Division planningapplication@stlucieco.org 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Office: 772-462-2822 — Fax: 772-462-1581 stlucieco. ov/ lannin division DEVELOPMENT APPLICATION A pre -application conference is recommended prior to main application submittal. Please contact the Planning Division to schedule an appointment. Submittal Type Site Plan fcheck each that ap lies ❑ Major Site Plan [I Minor Site Plan Rezoning 3 El Rezoning (straight rezoning) ❑ Major Adjustment to Major Site Plan ❑ Rezoning (includes PUDIPNRD/PMUD) ❑ Rezoning with Plan Amendment ❑ Major Adjustment to Minor Site Plan ❑ Major Adjustment to PUDIPNRDIPMUD Comprehensive Plan Amendment 4 ❑ Minor Adjustment to Major Site Plan ❑ Future Land Use Map Change ❑ Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment ❑ Minor Adjustment to Minor Site Plan Other El Minor Adjustment to PUD/PNRD/PMUD ❑ Administrative Relief Planned Development ❑ Punned Town or Village (PTV) ❑ Class A Mobile Home 5 ❑ Planned Country Subdivision (PCS) ❑ Developer Agreement (Submit per LDC ❑ Planned Retail Workplace (PRW) 11.08.03) ❑ Power Generation Plants ❑ Prelim. Planned Unit Develop. (PUD) ❑ Prelim. Planned Mixed Use Develop. (PMUD) ❑ Extension to Development Order ❑ ❑ Prelim. Planned Non -Res. Develop. (PNRD) ❑ Final Planned Unit Develop. Historical Designation/Change' ❑ Land Development Code Text Amendment' (PUD) ❑ Final Planned Mixed Use Develop. (PMUD) ❑ Final Planned Non -Res. Develop. ❑ Plat ❑ Post Development Order Change (PNRD) Conditional Use' ❑ Re -Submittal # 8 ❑ Conditional Use ❑ Shoreline Variance 93"Major Adjustment to a Conditional Use ❑ Stewardships — Sending/Receiving ❑ Minor Adjustment to a Conditional Use ❑ Telecom Tower (Submit per LDC 7.10.23) Variance 2 ❑ Transfer of Development Rights ❑ Administrative Variance ❑ Waiver to LDC/Comp. Plan Requirements s ❑ Appeal of Decision by Administrative Official" ❑ Variance El Variance to Coastal Setback Line ❑Eminent Domain Waiver" Application Supplement Packages I. Conditional Use 6. Historical Designation/Change 10. Appeal of Decision by 2. Variance 7. LDC Text Amendment Administrative Official 3. Rezoning 1 Zoning Atlas Amend. 8. Re- Submittal 11 •Eminent Domain Waiver 4. Comp. Plan Amendments 9. Waiver to LDC/Comp. Plan 5. Class A Mobile Home Requirements Refer to Fee Schedule for applicable fees. All required materials must be included at the time of submittal along with the appropriate non-refundable fee(sj. Additional fees will be due if a 3rd party traffic study review is receipt of quote of services from 3rd party. needed. These services will be invoiced to applicant upon -Please note: For all orojects requiring public notice, you will be invoiced by St. Lucie County Planning Division. Refer to "Public Procedures". -Other fees may be applicable by other external reviewing agencies; i.e. Fire District and proof of payment will be required prior to project approval. Page 1 of 5 Revised September 2021 Page 264 of 381 SPECIAL NOTICE (PLEASE READ BEFORE SIGNING ACKNOWLEDGMENTS BELOW) Submission of this application does not constitute the granting of approval. All appropriate requirements must be met prior to this project being presented for approval to the appropriate authority. St. Lucie County reserves the right to request additional information to ensure a complete review of this project. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS APPlicant Information (Progerty Developer): Business Name: Seaside 20, LLC Name: Lee Heaton Address: 277 Royal Poinciana Way, Suite 156 Palm Beach, FL 33480 (Please use an address that can accept overnight packages) Phone: 561-833-5500 Fax: Email: lee@heatoncompanies.com Agent Information: Business Name: Bean, Mead, Minton & Moore Name: W. Lee Dobbins, Esq. Address: 11903 S. 25th Street Ste. 200 Ft. PiercE;, FL 34947 (Please use an address that can accept overnight packages) Phone. 772-462-6715 Fax: 772-4164-7877 Email: ldobbins@deanmead.com Please note: both applicant and agent will receive all official correspondence on this p Property Owner Information This application and any application supplement will not be considered complete without the notarized signature of all property owners of record, which shall serve as an acknowledgment of the submittal of this application for approval. The property owner's signature below shall also serve as authorization for the above applicant or agent to act on behalf of said property owner. rope rty caner Signature Mailing Address: 277 Hoyal Poinciana Way, Suite 156 Palm Beach, FL 33480 Seaside 20, LLC Property Owner Name (Printed) Phone: 561-833-5500 If more than one owner, please submit additional pages STATE OF Florida , COUNTY OF Palm Beach The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this !11 by Lee Heaton day of AftC /I o 21 who is personally known to me or who has produced as identification. Signatur?of otary Type or Print N me o NNotary %J Commission Number (Seal) `A; :ui{" NAHCY tyN GAl)THIER ; Page 2 of 5 Revised September 2021 Eli Notary Public • State of Florida Commission # HH 076444 Ay Comm. Expires Feb 21, 2025 d through National Notary Assn, Page 265 of 381 Submittal Requirements The following checklist is provided as a reminder. Please see applicable code sections for more detailed submittal requirements. All Submittals MUST be in complete folded and collated sets. All applications must include the following: © Application, completed in black ink, with property owner signature(s) and notary seal (1 original and 11 copies) ❑ Aerial Photograph — property outlined (available from Property Appraiser's office ❑ Property Deed ❑ Legal description, in MS Word format, of subject property ❑ Property Tax Map — property outlined (electronic copy not required), ❑ Survey (24x36) ❑ 2 USB's of all documents submitted in lieu of email submission t plannin a lication stlucieco.or - ❑ with files named according to the Required Naming List. (attached) ❑ Concurrency Deferral Affidavit; or ❑ Description and analysis of the impact of the development on public facilities in accordance with the methodologies acceptable to the County (LDC Section 5.08.02). This will require a Transportation Assessment or a full Traffic Impact Report, if applicable. Site Plan and Planned Development Applications must also include: ❑ Site Plan 24"x36" at a scale of 1 "=50' (5 copies- folded, not rolled) ❑ Boundary Survey (24x36) — Signed and Sealed (5 originals) ❑ Topographic Survey (24x36) — Signed and Sealed (5 originals) ❑ Landscape Plan — Signed and Sealed (5 originals) ❑ Traffic Impact Report (TIR) (4 copies) if: o 50+ residential units o Development on N. or S. Hutchinson Island o Non-residential (see LDC Section 11.02.09(4)) ❑ Environmental Impact Report (4 copies) if -(See LDC Section 11.02.09(5)) o The property is ten acres or greater o The property, regardless of size, contains a wetland; o The property is identified on the "Native Habitat Inventory for SLC"; o The proposed development is located in whole, or part, within the One Hundred Year Flood Plain; o Development on N. or S. Hutchinson Island Development Order Extension Applications only require the following: ❑ Letter of justification — submitted at least 2 weeks prior to expiration. (LDC 11.02.06) ❑ Updated Traffic Analysis if applicable (4 copies) ❑ Approved Resolution or GM Order Final Plats only require 2 USBs (follow specifications above) & 4 copies of the following: ❑ Main Application and back up material ❑ Approved Site Plan and copy of approved Development Order ❑ Plat - Include extra copies of Plat for applicable conditions of approval (3 Original Mylars Needed for Recording) *Please note: Only a surveyor, attorney, or title agent is authorized to provide a legal description. The legal description provided on the property appraiser's website is not valid for our purposes. The legal description you provide us will be used in all future documentation. If it is incorrect, it may invalidate the results of any hearing(s). Page 3 of 5 Revised September 2021 Page 266 of 381 Project Information Project Name. Seaside Resort site address: 7700 S. Ocean Drive Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Parcel ID Number(s): 3522-343-0001-000-3 Legal Description: (Attach additional sheets if necessary — also must be provided in MS Word format on USB) See Attachment "A", attached hereto. Property location — Section/Township/Range: 22/36/41 Property size — acres: 15.40 Square footage: 671,220 Future Land Use Designation: RU / RM Zoning District: HIRD Description of project: (Attach additional sheets if necessary) Seaside (aka Ouanalao) Resort, Amendment to Resolution 2621-306, Condition No. 3, to read as set forth in Attachment "B", attached hereto. Type of construction (check all applicable boxes): ❑ Commercial Total Square Footage: Existing Proposed: ❑ industrial Total Square Footage: Existing Proposed: Residential No. of residential units: Proposed, - Existing No. of subdivided lots: Existing Proposed: Other Please specify: 25 Oceanfront Resort Villas and 25 Resort Cottages Number and size of out parcels (if applicable): Page 4 of 5 Revised September 2021 Page 267 of 381 * All electronically submitted documents must be formatted and named according to the list below. If your submittal includes a document not on the list, the document name shall clearly reflect the content of the submitted document. Document Document Format Required Name on USB Aerial Photograph PDF Aerial.pdf Application- PDF A lication. df Approval Order PDF A provalOrder.pdf Architectural Elevations PDF ArchElev. df Boundary / Topographic Survey PDF Bounds Topo.pdf Drainage 1 Stormwater Plan PDF Drains ePln.pdf Easements PDF Easements.pdf Environmental Impact Report PDF or Word E1R.pdf or EIR.doc- Existing Condition Plan PDF Existm Cond.pdf Flood Plain Landscape Plan PDF or Word Flood. df or Flood. Doc Legal Description PDF Landsca e.pdf Li htin Plan Word Le sil.doc Mitigation Plan PDF PDF Li hliin df Mitigation.pdf Mobile Home Plans PDF or Word Mob]eHome. df or MobileHome.doc Paving Plan PDF Paving.pdf Permit (External) PDF Permit.pdf Plat _ PDF Plat.pdf or Plat.doc PropertDeed PDF Deed. df Site Plan PDF SiteF'lan. df Traffic Impact Report PDF or Word TIR. )df or TIR.doc Tree SurveyPDF Tree dff Turtle Protection PDF or Word Turtle. df or Turtle.doc Utility Plan PDF Utiliit df Vegetation Removal Application PDF . Vegetation. odf Page 5 of 5 Revised September 2021 Page 268 of 381 ATTACHMENT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION PARCEL 1: SUBPARCEL A: BEING A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 5,767.86 FEET NORTHERLY (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES) FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 27 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; ON THE NORTH BY A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 6,323.74 FEET NORTHERLY (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES) FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 27; ON THE WEST BY THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD A -IA; AND ON THE EAST BY THE WATERS OF THE ATLANTIC OCEAN. SUBPARCEL B: NONEXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL A ABOVE, OVER AND ACROSS THE LAND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT C TO THE GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 979, PAGE 831, AS AMENDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1525, PAGE 1559, AS FURTHER AMENDED AND RESTATED IN THE AMENDED AND RESTATED GRANT OF EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1710, PAGE 172, ALL BEING RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED BY THAT CERTAIN FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 8, 2006, IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2652, PAGE 1920, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2: A TRACT OF LAND EXTENDING FROM THE ATLANTIC OCEAN TO THE INDIAN RIVER BEING DESCRIBED AS THE NORTH 189.66 FEET OF THE SOUTH 50994 FEET OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MEASURING 200 FEET ALONG THE ATLANTIC OCEAN AND BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS BEING THE NORTH 189.66 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: A TRACT OF LAND IN SECTIONS 22 AND 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, LYING AND BEING IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 4470 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 27, MEASURED ON THE PERPENDICULAR, AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 5767.86 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 27, MEASURED ON THE PERPENDICULAR, AND LYING 13ETWEEN THE WATERS OF THE INDIAN RIVER AND THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, LESS RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE ROAD A-1-A; ALSO DESCRIBED AS THE NORTH 787.09 FEET OF SAID SECTION 27, AND THE SOUTH 509.04 FEET OF SAID SECTION 22, LESS RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE ROAD A-1-A. PARCEL 3: THE NORTH 141.89 FEET OF THE SOUTH 320.28 FEET OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY THE WATER OF THE INDIAN RIVER AND ON THE EAST BY THE WATERS OF THE ATLANTIC OCEAN. PARCEL 4: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED ON HUTCHINSON ISLAND, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA EXTENDING FROM THE ATLANTIC OCEAN TO THE INDIAN RIVER BEING DESCRIBED AS THE SOUTH 178.39 FEET OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, AND THE NORTH 59.06 FEET OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, MEASURING 250 FEET ALONG THE ATLANTIC OCEAN. Page 269 of 381 Attachment "B" shall fiat st"in t No less than 70% of all roam ni 7hts 1 S 250 in any calendar ear shall be offered to the public not the unit owner for re it. Upon request from the County, but no sooner than 30 da s after the end of anv calenrinr upar ,+,. was satisfied for the Drevinis calendar ear. naition All resort lunits {villas and cottages) must be placed in the rental program run by resort management and rnade available for rental by the public when the owner of the unit is not staying in the unit. 03488994. v 1 Page 270 of 381 MICHELLE R. MILLER, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT - SAINT LUCIE COUNTY FILE # 4899403 OR BOOK 4654 PAGE 1111, Recorded 07/26/2021 09:02:26 AM RESOLUTION 2021-306 File No. CU 12202025913 & WV-3202125977 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO DEVELOP A TOURIST COURT RESORT AND ALCOHOL WAIVER FOR. ON -PREMISES COMSUMPTION OF LESS THAN ONE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED (1,600) FEET OF AN EXISTING PUBLIC PARK AS ACCESSORY TO A TOURIST COURT RESORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 7.10.11(A), KNOWN AS SEASIDE RESORT, CONSISTING OF +1-15.40 ACRES OF LAND GENERALLY SITUATED ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDE OF 7700 SOUTH OCEAN DRIVE, IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to findings in the staff report and traffic analysis review, has made the following determinations: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. Seaside 20, LLC presented a petition for a Conditional Use Permit to develop a tourist court resort, to be .known as Seaside (aka Ouanalao) Resort, containing twenty-five (25) oceanside villas and twenty-five (25) internal cottages, restaurant and bar, clubhouse, pool, fitness room and accessory dock with twenty (20) slips on the west side of SR A1A, within the H1RD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District, on a +1- 15.40-acre parcel of land located at 7700 S. Ocean Drive in Jensen Beach as legally described in Paragraph C and depicted on the attached map as Exhibit "A". 2. On May 20, 2021, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within five hundred (500) feet of the subject property. The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously voted to forward a recommendation of approval to the Board of County Commissioners. 3. On July 6, 2021, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice in the St. Lucie News Tribune at least 10 days prior to the hearing, installing a sign on the property and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, at which all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard. 4. On July 6, 2021, the Board of County, through Resolution 2021-312, approved a Major Site Plan to be known as Seaside (aka Ouanalao) Resort. Resolution No. 2021-306 CU 12202025913 & WV-3202125977 Page 1 Page 271 of 381 OR BOOK 4654 PAGE 1112 5. Section 11.07.01.0 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code providing that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four fifths (415) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. 6. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed conditional use on the immediate vicinity through site design, landscaping screening. 7. The proposed Conditional Use, with conditions therein, will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. 8. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Planning and Development Services on July 9, 2021. ALCOHOL WAIVER FOR DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS 1. Seaside 20, LLC presented a petition requesting relief from the provisions of Section 7.10.11(A) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code as it applies to the distance from the restaurant and bar to the public park, in order to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premises consumption by its resort guest and restaurant patrons. The subject site is located approximately 1,276 feet south of Ocean Bay Beachside Park and 800 feet north of Herman's Bay Beach Access/Park, in accordance with the measuring requirement established by Code. 2. Section 7.10.11(A) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code establishes regulations governing the distance between establishments selling alcoholic beverages for on -premises consumption and an existing religious facility, school, public park, or public playground of 1,600 feet. 3. Section 7.10.11(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides for a procedure whereby the Board of County Commissioners may approve a waiver to the distance requirements for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premises consumption. 4. The St. Lucie County Development Review Committee has recommended that the waiver to the distance for the selling of alcoholic beverages be granted, based upon the standards of review as described in Section 7.10.11(C) of the Land Development Code: Page 2 Resolution No. 2021-306 CU 12202025913 & VW-3202125977 Page 272 of 381 OR BOOK 4654 PAGE 1113 NOW, THEREFORE, BE 1T RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. The foregoing findings are hereby approved and adopted by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: B. Pursuant to Section 11.07.03 Conditional Uses and Section 3.01.03.AA.6.b.(1) of the Land development Code, the Conditional Use Permit for Seaside 20, LLC, for the project known as Seaside (AKA Ouanalao) Resort, as shown on the drawings for the project prepared by HJA Design Studio, LLC. dated June 21, 2021, and date stamped received by the Planning and Development Services Department on June 21, 2021, is hereby approved for the property described in Paragraph C, subject to the following conditions: Planning & Development Services Department — Planning Division 1. The tourist court resort shall be limited to twenty-five (25) 3-story resort villas, twenty-five (25) one 1-story resort cottages, with an approximate 37,000 sq. ft. clubhouse containing up to 20,000 sq. ft. of air-conditioned space. The clubhouse will include restaurant and bar space up to 7,200 sq. ft. (indoor and outdoor dining), banquet hall, ballroom, fitness room, spa, kids' playroom, pool area, and other amenities. The resort includes an accessory dock on the west side of SR A1A with twenty (20) slips. 2. A Unity of Title will be required prior to the issuance of a development permit. The Declaration of Condominium, consistent with the Conditions of Approval and acceptable to the County Attorney, shall be recorded prior to issuance of certificates of occupancy. 3. Owners of the resort units, (villas and cottages) shall not stay in their units for more than 185 calendar days per year. All resort units (villas and cottages) must be placed in the rental program run by resort management and made available for rental by the public when the owner of the unit is not staying in the unit. 4. The resort units within this project are not intended to qualify for the Florida Homestead property tax exemption. Owners of the resort units (villa unit and cottage units) may not declare their units as their homestead for the purpose of obtaining the Florida Homestead Property Tax Exemption. 5. A conditional use permit modification and new zoning compliance is required to transfer resort ownership. A change of management entity operating the resort, management entities or restaurant/bar operations require a new zoning compliance certificate demonstrating consistency with the conditional use permit. Individual villa or cottages sales under the Master Condominium Association will not require a Conditional Use modification. 6. Prior to issuance of a Site Development permit, a Photometric Plan compliant with the Sea Turtle Protection Plan shall be provided for the main guest and clubhouse parking areas. Resolution No. 2021-306 CU 12202025913 & WV-3202125977 Page 3 Page 273 of 381 OR BOOK 4654 PAGE 1114 i 7. No parking is permitted at any time along Ocean Drive (SR A1A). 8. The restaurant kitchen shall be operable and available to serve patrons when alcoholic beverages are sold or dispensed for on -premises consumption. 9. The resort activities shall comply with the St. Lucie County Land Development, Article V. Noise Control. 10.The accessory dock and water amenities are available only to registered resort guests. 11. No liveaboards are permitted to occupy any vessel on a temporary, permanent, or overnight basis. 12. No commercial fueling facilities or sewage pump -out stations shall be permitted. 13. No commercial activities, dock slip rental or selling of individual docks shall be permitted. Environmental Resources Department 14. Prior to issuance of a Vegetation Removal Permit or Exemption, listed species surveys, including not limited to gopher tortoise surveys, shall be updated as required per state and./or federal survey protocol. Should any listed species be found as a result of these updated surveys appropriate permits from state and federal agencies shall be required. 15. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy, all Category I listed invasive plant species shall be eradicated from the site. ` 16. Prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for each building, all seaward and shore -perpendicular facing windows and doors shall be fitted with tinted glass or film with a visible light transmittance value of forty-five (45) percent or less. A registered Florida architect or engineer shall conduct a nighttime survey with all of the beachfront lighting turned on and provide a report of the inspection to the Environmental Resources Department as outlined in the approved Sea Turtle Protection Plan. If any violations of the sea turtle lighting code are identified a Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued until all violations have been corrected. 17. Prior to issuance of a Vegetation Removal Permit or Exemption, the developer shall provide an updated executed Conservation Easement, approved Preserve Area Monitoring and Management Plan (PAMMP), Dune Restoration Plan and Sea Turtle Protection Plan (STPP) as applicable with an attached affidavit and cashier's check (payable to the Clerk of the Court for recording fees) to the County Attorney. The applicant shall also provide a GIS shapefile or CAD file of the conservation easement boundaries to St. Lucie County. A copy of a standard Conservation Easement can be found on the St. Lucie County Environmental Page 4 Resolution No. 2021-306 CU 12202026913 & WV-3202125977 Page 274 of 381 OR BOOK 4654 PAGE 1115 Resources Department website at: http://www.stlucieco.goy/pdfs/Conservation_ Easement Form.pdf. 18. Prior to issuance of a permit for the docking facility, updated seagrass surveys along with an updated EIR reflecting avoidance and minimization of impacts to aquatic resources shall be provided to the Environmental Resources Department. If surveys indicate further avoidance and minimization of impacts is necessary, an adjustment to the site plan will be required. C. The property on which this Conditional Use Permit and Alcohol Waiver are being granted is described as follows: Legal Description: PARCEL 1: SUBPARCEL A: BEING A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 5,767.86 FEET NORTHERLY (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES) FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 27 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; ON THE NORTH BY A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 6,323.74 FEET NORTHERLY (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES) FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 27; ON THE WEST BY THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD A-1A; AND ON THE EAST BY THE WATERS OF THE ATLANTIC OCEAN. SUBPARCEL B: NONEXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL A ABOVE, OVER AND ACROSS THE LAND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT C TO THE GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 979, PAGE 831, AS AMENDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1525, PAGE 1559, AS FURTHER AMENDED AND RESTATED IN THE AMENDED AND RESTATED GRANT OF EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1710, PAGE 172, ALL BEING RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED BY THAT CERTAIN FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 8, 2006, IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2652, PAGE 1920, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2: A TRACT OF LAND EXTENDING FROM THE ATLANTIC OCEAN TO THE INDIAN RIVER BEING DESCRIBED AS THE NORTH 189.66 FEET OF THE SOUTH 509.94 FEET OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP .36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MEASURING 200 FEET ALONG THE ATLANTIC OCEAN AND BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS BEING THE NORTH 189.66 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY:A TRACT OF LAND IN SECTIONS 22 AND 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE Resolution No. 2021-306 CU 12202025913 & WV-3202125977 Page 5 Page 275 of 381 OR BOOK 4654 PAGE 1116 41 EAST, LYING AND BEING IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 4470 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 27, MEASURED ON THE PERPENDICULAR, AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 5767.86 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 27, MEASURED ON THE PERPENDICULAR, AND LYING BETWEEN THE WATERS OF THE INDIAN RIVER AND THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, LESS RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE ROAD A-1-A; ALSO DESCRIBED AS THE NORTH 787.09 FEET OF SAID SECTION 27, AND THE SOUTH 509.04 FEET OF SAID SECTION 22, LESS RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE ROAD A-1-A. PARCEL 3: THE NORTH 141.89, FEET OF THE SOUTH 320.28 FEET OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY THE WATER OF THE INDIAN RIVER AND ON THE EAST BY THE WATERS OF THE ATLANTIC OCEAN. PARCEL 4: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED ON HUTCHINSON ISLAND, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA EXTENDING FROM THE ATLANTIC OCEAN TO THE INDIAN RIVER BEING DESCRIBED AS THE SOUTH 178.39 FEET OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, AND THE NORTH 59.06 FEET OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, MEASURING 250 FEET ALONG THE ATLANTIC OCEAN. Parcel ID#s: 3522-343-0001-000-3, 3522-344-0001-000-6, 3522-344-0002-000-3, 3522-342-0002-000-7 D. The approvals and authorizations granted by this Resolution are for the purpose of developing a tourist court resort within St. Lucie County, and are not assigned to any other party or institution. Should the petitioners choose or decide to assign this operation to another entity or individual, a minor adjustment to the Conditional Use Permit shall be required. E. The approvals and authorizations granted by this Resolution shall expire on 24 months, unless construction of the tourist court has begun as described in Paragraph B above, or an extension has been granted in accordance with Section 11.07.05(F), St. Lucie County Land Development Code. F. The Petitioner, Seaside 20, LLC, is advised as part of this Conditional Use Permit approval for Seaside (AKA Ouanalao) Resort, the Petitioner shall obtain all applicable development permits and construction authorizations from the appropriate state and federal and local regulatory agencies including, but not limited to, the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, South Florida Water Management District, and the St. Resolution No. 2021-306 CU 12202025913 & VW-3202125977 Page 6 Page 276 of 381 OR BOOK 4654 PAGE 1117 Lucie County Environmental Resources and Building Departments prior to the commencement of any development activities on the property described in Paragraph C. Issuance of this permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the Petitioner to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of this permit if the Petitioner fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertake actions that may result in a violation of state or federal law. G. The conditions set forth in Paragraph B are an integral non severable part of the Conditional Use Permit approval granted by this Resolution. If any condition set forth in Paragraph B is determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the Petitioner declines to comply voluntarily with the condition, the Conditional Use Permit approval granted by this resolution becomes null and void. H. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the Conditional Use Permit site plan drawings described in Paragraph B. which plan shall be placed on file with the Planning and Development Services Department. This Order shall become effective upon the date indicated below. An appeal from the Board of County Commissioners' action may be processed within thirty (30) days in accordance with Section 11.11.025, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. J. This Resolution shall be recorded in the Public Records. After the motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Page 7 Chris Dzadovsky, Chair AYE Sean Mitchell, Vice -Chair AYE Commissioner Linda Bartz AYE Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson AYE Commissioner Cathy Townsend AYE Resolution No. 2021-306 CU 12202025913 & VW-3202125977 Page 277 of 381 OR BOOK 4654 PAGE 1118 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 6 day of July, 2021. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLOIRDA BY 4gg"�iOe CHAIR ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS- Y AT DEPUTY CLE oaf co��,� COUNTY m rGa y� Page 8 Resolution No. 2021-306 CU 12202025913 & WV-3202125977 Page 278 of 381 OR BOOK 4654 PAGE 1119 Exhibit "A" Location Map Indian River Lagoon Page 9 Subject Parcel Atian6c Ocean Resolution No. 2021-306 CU 12202025913 & WV-3202125977 Page 279 of 381 OR BOOK 4654 PAGE 1120 St Lucie County Certificate of Capacity Date 7/9/2021 1 Certificate No. 3147 This document certifies that concurrency will be met and that adequate public facility capacity exists to maintain the standards for levels of service as adopted in the St Lucie County Comprehensive Plan for: 1. Type of development Conditional Use Number of units 50 Number of square feet 2. Property legal description & Tax ID no. 3522-343-0001-000-3; 3522-344-0001-000-6; 3522-344-0002-000-3; 3522-342-0002-000-7 7700 S Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Seaside (AKA Ouanalao) Resort 3. Approval: Building Resolution No. 2021-306 Letter 4. Subject to the following conditions for concurrency: Owner's name Seaside 20 LLC Address 277 Royal Poinciana Way, Suite 156 Palm Beach FL 33480 6. Certificate Expiration Date This Certificate of Capacity is transferable only to subsequent owners of the same parcel, and is subject to the same terms, conditions and expiration date listed herein. The expiration date can be extended only under the same terms and conditions as the underlying development orderissued with this certificate, or for subsequent developIenat der{sossued for the same property, use and size as described herein. n I I- �J Signed Planning and Clevelopm( St Lucie County, Florida Friday, July 9, 2021 Date: 7/9/2021 Services Director Page 1 of 2 Page 280 of 381 RESOLUTION 2021-312 File No. MJSP-12202025912 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY GRANTING A MAJOR SITE PLAN FOR A 37,000 SQUARE FOOT TOURIST COURT RESORT FACILITY, FOR A PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS SEASIDE (AKA OUANALAO) RESORT, WITHIN THE HIRD (HUTCHINSON ISLAND RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) ZONING DISTRICT ON 15.40 ACRES OF PROPERTY LOCATED IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to findings in the staff report and traffic analysis review, has made the following determinations: 1. Seaside 20, LLC, presented a Major Site Plan application to develop a Tourist Court Resort containing twenty-five (25) oceanside villas and twenty-five (25) internal cottages, clubhouse amenity center with restaurant and bar, and accessory dock with twenty (20) slips, associated parking, drainage, and utility infrastructure, within the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning for the property generally located at 7700 S. Ocean Drive, in Jensen Beach, situated on the east and west side of Ocean Drive (SR A1A), as legally described in Paragraph A and depicted on the attached map as Exhibit "A". 2. On July 6, 2021, this Board held a public meeting on this petition. 3. On July 6, 2021, the Board of County Commissioners, through Resolution 2021- 306, approved the Conditional Use Permit and Alcohol Waiver for Distance Requirements for Seaside (aka Ouanalao) Resort. 4. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the Major Site Plan for the project and found it meets the technical requirements of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and has satisfied the standards of review set forth in Section 11.02.07, Standards for Site Plan Review, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 5. Planning Staff has performed a detailed analysis of the project and determined it to be consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan. The analysis is found in the Planning and Development Services Department memorandum titled Seaside Resort, Major Site Plan (MJSP-12202025912), Conditional Use (CU-12202025912) & (Alcohol Distance Waiver (WV-3202125977), dated June 21, 2021. MICHELLE R. MILLER, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT SAINT LUCIE COUNTY31952 PM FILE 0 4899148 07/23/2021 0190 Doc Type: RESO OR BOOK 4654 PAGE 183 RECORDING: $ E Resolution No. 2021-312 MJSP-12202025912 Page 1 Page 281 of 381 6. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed conditional use on the immediate vicinity through site design, landscaping screening. 7. The proposed Major Site Plan, with conditions therein, will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. 8. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. The property on which this Major Site Plan is being granted is described as follows: Legal Description: PARCEL 1: SUBPARCEL A: BEING A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 5,767.86 FEET NORTHERLY (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES) FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 27 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; ON THE NORTH BY A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 6,323.74 FEET NORTHERLY (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES) FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 27; ON THE WEST BY THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD A-1A; AND ON THE EAST BY THE WATERS OF THE ATLANTIC OCEAN. SUBPARCEL B: NONEXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL A ABOVE, OVER AND ACROSS THE LAND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT C TO THE GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 979, PAGE 831, AS AMENDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1525, PAGE 1559, AS FURTHER AMENDED AND RESTATED IN THE AMENDED AND RESTATED GRANT OF EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1710, PAGE 172, ALL BEING RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED BY THAT CERTAIN FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 8, 2006, IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2652, PAGE 1920, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Resolution No. 2021-312 MJSP-12202025912 Page 2 Page 282 of 381 PARCEL 2: A TRACT OF LAND EXTENDING FROM THE ATLANTIC OCEAN TO THE INDIAN RIVER BEING DESCRIBED AS THE NORTH 189.66 FEET OF THE SOUTH 509.94 FEET OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 4' EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MEASURING 200 FEET ALONG THE ATLANTIC OCEAN AND BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS BEING THE NORTH 189.66 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY:/ TRACT OF LAND IN SECTIONS 22 AND 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, LYING AND BEING IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BOUNDEE ON THE SOUTH BY A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 4470 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 27, MEASURED ON THE PERPENDICULAR, AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 5767.86 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAIL SECTION 27, MEASURED ON THE PERPENDICULAR, AND LYING BETWEEN THE WATERS OF THE INDIAN RIVER AND THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, LESS RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE ROAD A-1-A; ALSO DESCRIBEC AS THE NORTH 787.09 FEET OF SAID SECTION 27, AND THE SOUTH 509.04 FEET OF SAID SECTION 22, LESS RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE ROAD A-1-A. PARCEL 3: THE NORTH 141.89 FEET OF THE SOUTH 320.28 FEET OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY THE WATER OF THE INDIAN RIVER AND ON THE EAST BY THE WATERS OF THE ATLANTIC OCEAN. PARCEL 4: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED ON HUTCHINSON ISLAND, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA EXTENDING FROM THE ATLANTIC OCEAN TO THE INDIAN RIVER BEING DESCRIBED AS THE SOUTH 178.39 FEET OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, AND THE NORTH 59.06 FEET OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, MEASURING 250 FEET ALONG THE ATLANTIC OCEAN. Parcel ID#: 3522-343-0001-000-3, 3522-344-0001-000-6, 3522-344-0002-000-3 3522-342-0002-000-7 B. Pursuant to Section 11.02.04 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the proposed Major Site Plan project to be known as Seaside Resort, as depicted in Exhibit "B", is hereby approved as shown on the Site Plan drawings for the project prepared by HJA Design Studio Landscape Architects, and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Planning & Development Services Department on June 21, 2021, subject to the following conditions: Resolution No. 2021-312 MJSP-12202025912 Page 3 Page 283 of 381 1. Any alternative use proposed for the facility will require a Conditional Use Adjustment. 2. Prior to Certificate of Occupancy, the applicant shall provide a photometric plan that demonstrates compliance with LDC Section 7.09.04(K). C. This Major Site Plan for Seaside (aka Ouanalao) Resort shall expire within twenty-four (24) months of the effective date of this order unless a building permit is issued or an extension is granted in accordance with the provision of Land Development Code Section 11.02.06. D. The developer is advised as part of this Major Site Plan approval that the property owner(s), developer, etc. including any successors in interest, shall obtain all applicable development permits and construction authorizations from the appropriate State and Federal and local regulatory agencies including, but not limited to, the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Florida Department of Transportation, South Florida Water Management District, and the St. Lucie County Environmental Resources, Public Works, and Building Departments prior to the commencement of any development activities on the property described in Part A. Issuance of this permit by the County does not in any way create any rights on the part of the developer to obtain a permit from a state or federal agency and does not create any liability on the part of the County for issuance of this permit if the developer fails to obtain requisite approvals or fulfill the obligations imposed by a state or federal agency or undertake actions that may result in a violation of state or federal law. E. The conditions set forth in Part "B" are an integral non -severable part of the Site plan approval granted by this Resolution. If any condition set forth in Part "B" is determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the developer declines to comply voluntarily with that condition, the Site Plan approval granted by this Resolution shall become null and void. F. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "C" and made a part hereof the Resolution, was granted by the Planning & Development Services Department Director on July 9, 2021. G. A recorded copy of this Resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Part "B", which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Planning & Development Services Department Director. H. This Order shall become effective upon the date indicated below. An appeal of the Board of County Commissioners' action may be processed within thirty (30) days in accordance with Section 11.11.02.F, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. This Resolution shall be recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. Resolution No. 2021-312 MJSP-12202025912 Page 4 Page 284 of 381 After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chris Dzadovsky, Chair AYE Sean Mitchell, Vice -Chair AYE Linda Bartz, Commissioner AYE Frannie Hutchinson, Commissioner AYE Cathy Townsend, Commissioner AYE PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 6 day of July, 2021. ATTEST: DEP BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLOIRDA '1jr .6v �i i y coM,�i CLERK IrGft rr, Fu'��' APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS \ COUNTY ATTO Resolution No. 2021-312 MJSP-12202025912 Page 5 Page '285 of 381 Exhibit "A" Location Map 202912 25913 (sort Resolution No. 2021-312 MJSP-12202025912 Page 6 Page 286 of 381 Exhibit "B" Site Plan F r ; j a4 [j;4: a F IT4 Tf a It pQ 4 Z I 4� 0 00"1 V 1 11 4,1 4TV Ir T, J JF -,, �i� , 1 4 j� Ff 41 5T F,11 .1 4v,51 low ri Seaside Resort Stte Phan Resolution No. 2021-312 MJSP-1 2202025912 Page 7 Page 287 of 381 St Lucie County Certificate of Capacity Date 7/9/2021 Certificate No. 3148 This document certifies that concurrency will be met and that adequate public facility capacity exists to maintain the standards for levels of service as adopted in the St Lucie County Comprehensive Plan for: 1. Type of development Major Site Plan Number of units 50 Number of square feet 2. Property legal description & Tax ID no. 3522-343-0001-000-3; 3522-344-0001-000-6; 3522-344-0002-000-3; 3522-342-0002-000-7 7700 S Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, FL 34957 Seaside (AKA Ouanalao) Resort 3. Approval: Building Resolution No. 2021-312 Letter 4. Subject to the following conditions for concurrency: Owner's name Seaside 20, LLC Address 277 Royal Poiciana Way, Suite 156 Palm Beach FL 33480 6. Certificate Expiration Date This Certificate of Capacity is transferable only to subsequent owners of the same parcel, and is subject to the same terms, conditions and expiration date listed herein. The expiration date can be extended only under the same terms and conditions as the underlying development orderissued with this certificate, or for subsequent develop(nentoder(�))ssued for the same property, use and size as described herein. Signed IN La I �� I Date: 7/9/2021 Planning and Oevelopment Services Director St Lucie County, Florida Friday, July 9, 2021 Page 1 of 2 Page 288 of 381 Location Map iiih-� 11 Ia\ 1111111111: I IIIIIIIIII�a7 ► �. i rr `• ��'� ' --r1,l1 �IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII Illilllllllll�� ,�`• � � ; ,- � , Site Data Total Site Area (671,220 SF) 15.40 Ac. Lot East of Al (617,539 SF) 14.17 Ac. Lot West of Al (53,681 SF) 1.23 Ac. Zoning Hutchinson Island Residential District (H.I.R.D.) Overlay Zoning South Hutchinson Island District, South (SHIRD-S) Zone B Land Use RM & RU Existing Use Vacant Proposed Use Resort / Tourist Court Maximum Building Height 35' Proposed # of Units 50 Units PCN: 3522-342-0002-000-7 / 3522-343-0001-000-3 3522-344-0001-000-6 / 3522-344-0002-000-3 Building Data # of Units Stories / Heiaht Bedrooms Gross Floor Area (A/C) Resort Villas 25 Units 3-Story / 35' 4 (per unit) 4,203 sf (per unit) Resort Cottages 25 Units 1-Story / 21'-8" 2 (per unit) 1,332 sf (per unit) Clubhouse 0 Units 3-Story / 35' 0 19,778 sf Building Setbacks Required Front Setback: 25' Rear Setback: 15' Side Setback: 10, Separation Between Buildings 10, Open Space Open Space Required: 234,927 Sf 5.39 Ac. 35% Open Space Provided: 433,628 Sf 9.95 Ac. 65% Pervious Area / Open Space Landscape Areas / Open Space Dry Detention Mangrove Wetland Dune Preservation Zone Beach Area 50' Wetland / UDland Buffer Total: Impervious Area 172,459 Sf 3.97 Ac. 26% 13,021 Sf 0.30 Ac. 2% 19,466 Sf 0.44 Ac. 3% 104,879 Sf 2.40 Ac. 15% 95,047 Sf 2.18 Ac. 14% 25,612 Sf 0.59 Ac. 4% 430,484 Sf 9.88 Ac. 64% Total Building Coverage 129,565 Sf 2.97 Ac Clubhouse 14,848 Sf (Includes porte cochere & 2nd level pool deck) Resort Villas (2,869 sf per Villa x 25) 71,725 Sf (Includes 2nd level pool deck) Resort Cottages (1,705 sf per cottage x 25) 42,625 Sf (Includes covered patio & porch) Covered Golf Cart Parking 367 Sf Vehicular Use Area 74,364 Sf 1.71 Ac Other Paved Areas / Walks / Pads 36,807 Sf 0.84 Ac Total: 240,736 Sf 5.52 Ac Wetland & Upland Buffer Data 19% 36% Coastal Construction Setback Line RECORDED 11/20/72 IN PB 16, PG 32 Resort Villa T 3-Story 15' Ocean Access Easement (PER ORB 979, PG 812 & ORB 1710, PG 189) 10' Side Building / / Setback Typ. 21 ` ZONE "AO" "2' DEPTH) 1 Coastal Construction 150' Control Line RECORDED 09/15/88 / DLAIN BOUNDARY_ IN PB 26, PG 26 (TYPICAL) 15' Ocean Access Easement (PER ORB 979, PG 812 & ORB 1710, PG 189) O 4' Informal Dune Crossover (Pelican Pointe Beach Access) Atlantic Ocean 4' Informal Conservation Easement Dune Crossover / (PER ORB 2424, PG 292) � Beach Area 4' Informal Dune Crossover Mean High Water Line F-- Seasonal High Water Line Conservation Easement (PER ORB 2424, PG 292) 4' Informal Dune Crossover WrIffIl 1A J F%A- 3-Story rAhWE WEA M.- 71 Clubhouse ♦�♦1���♦�� .�11e1��� " Port • • 1i♦♦t .i♦i i'a COchere! . 1 �,♦♦�♦p♦ �.11♦11�, ... .. - . . . • ' _ • � -, • �learance Min.): NIIIINtltllllllll �11� 11� �1 ,�♦�• i . = N � �11111♦� II♦11♦1� • �♦11♦ III♦1. ' Ex. Vegetation Line Typ. i 2nd Level Pool ` 10� Area / Deck Typ. ® ® f 10' Side Building © Setback Typ. 10 Landscape Buffer I - _ _ 10' a < 11 -- _ _ III -- -- _ ----- -- Bike Rack ZONE % 1 2 O - (6 ike Capacity) R -� - H dram 221 2 0' (0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE) ,! I O 12'9 4 Crosswalk // Typ. - - ------ Covered 11' Covered Golf % 20" L- 5 © 12© .d P. e-way Typ. ` ; j' 3' �8'- - � 22'- Cart Parking Spaces I O I I' 12' 5' Drop-o - -cgs Gate / 9' x 7' Typ I 8 5' Walk L "� - - - - Q' w/ Knox Box s' I ewa Trash Truck / Car % Typ_Covered 5' Walk-- 5 Central 0 7 Patio Typ. Typ. 2 a 16 Amenity Area 62' Turn -around / 7 8 g I t\ 15' © 8' 10' 8, T P. 6 5 15' 15' \ 89 3 17 Future Land Use: CPUB � / J � -� I _ _ 10, \ � I 10' Zoning: CPUB I 9 1 15' - -- -- I rj I 18 8 8 I s'WalkTyp. 1 Existing Use: Public Beach O ZONE 'At TyPalk 11 13 14 I T p � j 1 10' \ -- (BFE 4' - - \ 4' Walk Typ. �,.._.- I I Paver Areaw/ i 100' \ \ -- -- -- - � Dumpster Enclosure Detention �'�� "" �''- rd., p, i 18 \�--' O (6' Wall -See Detail on Sheet SP-3) / O Lift 10' 16' 1 $ 10, 1 9 10, ©p 24' 2,347 sf / 0.05 Ac. I Dry Detention rea Detention i Signage _ Station 15' / 6,463 sf / 0.15 Ac. - Emergency 2 9 6 53, call Box 2,100 sf / 0.05 Ac. I I ' I I Dry 12' 12' _ - _ - I Vehicle Exit Only ------------- _ _-- -- _------ _---- - _ - I Detention f i 2,a 4a--sf / Stabilized -------------sz---- - ------ ----------------- u Area Pro .Relocated 8' Sidewalk - 2' Parking Overhang Typ. r . Relocated 8' Sidewalk Proposed Project Signage 'C 1.5' Landscape Buffer �B Pedestrian 32 sf Max. Sign Existing 8' Sidewalk - -- 15' Landscape Buffer 25' Front Crossing to' Max. Ht. m 10' FPL Easement Existing Mangrove Wetland 19,446 Sf 0.44 Ac. Wetland Impact 0 Sf 0.00 Ac. Required 50' Wetland / Upland Buffer 25,612 Sf 0.59 Ac. Provided 50' Wetland / Upland Buffer 25,612 Sf 0.59 Ac. Parking Data Required Parking: Resort Villas [.96 spaces per bedroom ] [ LU Code 330 ] 25 Total Villas x 4 Bedrooms each x .96 96 Spaces Resort Cottages [.96 spaces per bedroom ] [ LU Code 330 ] 25 Total Cottages x 2 Bedrooms each x .96 48 Spaces Clubhouse / Indoor & Outdoor Dinning [ 9.31 spaces per 1,000 SF ] [ LU Code 932 ] 4,300 SF Total of Dinning / 1,000 x 9.31 40 Spaces Total Required: 184 Spaces Total Required based on Parking Report: [ Shared Parking & Reductions ] 159 Spaces Provided Parking: Two Car Driveways [ Resort Villas - Two Car Driveway per Unit ] 50 Spaces Two Car Garages [ Resort Villas - Two Car Garage per Unit ] 50 Spaces Standard 90' Parking [ 10' x 18' Typ. or 10' x 16' w/ 2' Overhang Typ. ] 67 Spaces Parallel / On -street Parking [ 8' x 23' Typ. ] 24 Spaces Total Provided: 191 Spaces [Includes 5 Handicap Spaces ] Ke uilding e a _ tate Road A-1-/A _ illuminated, or backlernally ( ) Directional Sign illuminated, or backli � 25' Front PER ORB 2640, PG 2402 � i m (100' p/\/,/\ _ 6 Sf Max. Sign Face r�� Building Setback R V V / Non -illuminated, externally a. = illuminated, or backlit. 10' FPL Easement Resort Cottage Typ. \ n \� (PER ORB 2640, PG 2402) 1-St0 / 5' Sidewalk Typ. 5' Boardwalk Connection -Story N24°32'11"W 625.48' 1 Bike Rack i (6 Bike Capacity) _ - I N89°56'21"E W W W W W W W W W W W W angrove We'tlan� 21.35' Future Land Use: RU 0.44.,Ac.� Zoning: HIRD0� MF�,V�%L� I I Existing Use: Single Family � W ' W Y Setback,. 26 `\MHWL W W IW W W W W W Y W I ZONE "AE" W W W W /�� I (BFE 5) W W W W W W W W W W Y W Y W / / 50' Wetland Buffer Wetland Line Typ. / Mean High Water Line Indian River LagoonProposed Dock Wetland Line Typ. (See Enlargement on Sheet SP-3) Utilities Water Service: Fort Pierce Utilities Authority Sewage Treatment: St. Lucie County Utilities Drainage Summary Statement The stormwater management system for the project will consist of dry detention areas, underground stormwater chambers and pervious pavement/pavers. The positive discharge from the site will be to the Indian River through control structures. Additional water quality (150%) will be provided as is required for discharge to an Outstanding Florida Water. Notes 1. SUBJECT PROPERTY LIES IN FLOOD ZONES "VE" (BFE 9), "AO" (2' DEPTH), "X" (0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE), AND "AE" (BFE 4 & 5). FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARIES SHOWN HEREON WERE SCALED FROM DIGITAL FEDERAL EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) FLOOD ZONE MAP #12111C0303K, DATED FEBRUARY 19, 2020. NO FIELD SURVEYING WAS PERFORMED TO DETERMINE THIS ZONE. 2. Rope and bollards or other similar pedestrian guidance fencing shall be provided along the landward toe of the dune preservation zone to prevent any encroachment of unapproved beach access paths. Legend W W W Mangrove Wetland Typ. (0.44 Ac.) Y W Provided 50' Wetland Buffer Typ. (0.59 Ac.) Dune Preservation Zone Typ. (2.40 Ac.) Legal Description PARCEL 1: SUBPARCEL A: BEING A TRACT OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 5,767.86 FEET NORTHERLY (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES) FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SECTION 27 OF SAID TOWNSHIP AND RANGE; ON THE NORTH BY A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND 6,323.74 FEET NORTHERLY (MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES) FROM THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 27; ON THE WEST BY THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF STATE ROAD A-1-A; AND ON THE EAST BY THE WATERS OF THE ATLANTIC OCEAN. SUBPARCEL B: NONEXCLUSIVE EASEMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF PARCEL A ABOVE, OVER AND ACROSS THE LAND DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT C TO THE GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 979, PAGE 831, AS AMENDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1525, PAGE 1559, AS FURTHER AMENDED AND RESTATED IN THE AMENDED AND RESTATED GRANT OF EASEMENT AS RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 1710, PAGE 172, ALL BEING RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED BY THAT CERTAIN FIRST AMENDMENT TO AMENDED AND RESTATED GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED SEPTEMBER 8, 2006, IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 2652, PAGE 1920, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. PARCEL 2: A TRACT OF LAND EXTENDING FROM THE ATLANTIC OCEAN TO THE INDIAN RIVER BEING DESCRIBED AS THE NORTH 189.66 FEET OF THE SOUTH 509.94 FEET OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MEASURING 200 FEET ALONG THE ATLANTIC OCEAN AND BEING FURTHER DESCRIBED AS BEING THE NORTH 189.66 FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: A TRACT OF LAND IN SECTIONS 22 AND 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, LYING AND BEING IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 4470 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 27, MEASURED ON THE PERPENDICULAR, AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY A LINE PARALLEL TO AND 5767.86 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 27, MEASURED ON THE PERPENDICULAR, AND LYING BETWEEN THE WATERS OF THE INDIAN RIVER AND THE ATLANTIC OCEAN, LESS RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE ROAD A-1-A; ALSO DESCRIBED AS THE NORTH 787.09 FEET OF SAID SECTION 27, AND THE SOUTH 509.94 FEET OF SAID SECTION 22, LESS RIGHT OF WAY OF STATE ROAD A-1-A. PARCEL 3: THE NORTH 141.89 FEET OF THE SOUTH 320.28 FEET OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY THE WATER OF THE INDIAN RIVER AND ON THE EAST BY THE WATERS OF THE ATLANTIC OCEAN. PARCEL 4: A TRACT OF LAND LOCATED ON HUTCHINSON ISLAND, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA EXTIENDING FROM THE ATLANTIC OCEAN TO THE INDIAN RIVER BEING DESCRIBED AS THE SOUTH 178.39 FEET OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, AND THE NORTH 59.06 FEET OF SECTION 27, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, MEASURING 250 FEET ALONG THE ATLANTIC OCEAN. R V __ ZONE A DEP TH) 10' Landscape Buffer Coastal Construction / Control Line RECORDED 11/20/72 IN PB 16, PG 32 8' Opaque Vinyl Fence (See Detail on Sheet SP-3) FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY (TYPICAL) ZONE 'Y' (0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE) Future Land Use: RH Zoning: HIRD Existing Use: Vacant ZON Y' o ANN CHANCE) ZONE "AE" (BFE 4) 50 E. Ocean Blvd., Suite 101 Stuart, Florida 34994 T 772.678.7200 F 772.678.7201 www.hjadesignstudio.com LA 0000905 k,� U. y> T O U W U Z3 VJ U) Copyright The following drawings are instruments of service to the Landscape Architect. They are not products of design. All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans indicated or Development Team represented by this drawing are owned by and the property of the designer, and were created, evolved, and developed for use on and in connection with the specified project. None of such ideas, designs, arrangements, or plans shall be used by Owner Environmental Consultant Surveyor or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation for any w purpose whatsoever without the written permission of the Seaside 20, LLC Ecological Consulting of Florida R.L. Vaught & Associates designer. Lee Heaton & George Heaton Chris Sopotnick Michael Zarrella 277 Royal Poinciana Way, #156, 850 NW Federal Hwy 9075 SE Bridge Road Palm Beach Gardens, FL 33480 Stuart, FL 34994 Hobe Sound, FL 33455 (561) 833-5500 (772) 220-7817 (772) 546-8086 Agent / Landuse Attorney Traffic Engineer Architect Dean, Mead, Minton & Zwemer O'Rourke Engineering & Planning Randall Stofft Architects Lee Dobbins Susan E. O'Rourke, P.E. Randy Stofft 1903 South 25th Street, Suite 200, 22 SE Seminole Street 42 North Swinton Ave Fort Pierce, FL 34947 Stuart, FL 34994 Delray Beach, FL 33444 Job No. 2020-39 (772) 464-7700 (772) 781-7918 (561) 243-0799 Drawn By TT Agent / Planner/Landscape Architect Civil Engineer Coastal Engineer Checked By MH HJA Design Studio, LLC Schulke, Bittle & Stoddard LLC Isiminger & Stubbs Engineering, Inc. MH Michael Houston, President Joseph Schulke Darwin Stubbs Approved By 50 SE Ocean Blvd. Suite 101 1717 Indian River Blvd. Ste. 201 649 US Hwy 1, Ste. 9 12-17-20 Stuart, FL 34994 Vero Beach, FL 32960 North Palm Beach, FL 33408 Submittal Dates (772) 678-7200 (772) 770-9622 (561) 881-0003 3-04-21 4-14-21 6-01-21 Revision Dates Scale: 1" = 60' 1 sp�i 0' 30' 60' 120' 180' North Page 289 of 381 Coastal Construction Setback Line RECORDED 11/20/72 IN PB 16, PG 32 15' Ocean Access Easement (PER ORB 979, PG 812 & ORB 1710, PG 189) 10' Side Building Setback Typ. ZONE "AO" (2' DEPTH) Coastal Construction Control Line RECORDED 09/15/88 '_OODPLAIN BOUNDARY IN PB 26, PG 26 (TYPICAL) 15' Ocean Access Easement (PER ORB 979, PG 812 & - ORB 1710, PG 189) 10' Landscape Buffer ZONE "X" (0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE) Covered Golf \ Cart Parking Spaces 9'x7'Typ. Trash Truck / Car / Turn -around Dumpster Enclosure (6' Wall - See Detail on Sheet SP-3) Signage - Emergency Vehicle Exit Only Stabilized Turf Area Existing 8' Sidewalk J 15' Landscape Buffer Wetland Line Typ. Atlantic Ocean O DoarQwalK uorlrlecuort Mean High Water Line Seasonal High Water Line \ N24032'11"Ins 525.48' Wetland Line Typ. Proposed Dock (See Enlargement on Sheet SP-3) 2nd Level Pool Area / Deck Typ. 10' Side Building Setback Typ. ZONE "AO" "?' nEPTH) _10' Landscape Buffer Coastal Construction Control Line RECORDED 11/20/72 IN PB 16, PG 32 8' Opaque Vinyl Fence (See Detail on Sheet SP-3) FLOODPLAIN BOUNDARY (TYPICAL) ZONE 'Y' (0.2% ANNUAL CHANCE) X" CHANCE) Scale: 1" = 50' 0' 25' 50' 100, 150' 0 North ZONE (BFE 50 E. Ocean Blvd., Suite 101 Stuart, Florida 34994 T 772.678.7200 F 772.678.7201 www.hjadesignstudio.com LA 0000905 1*1 U. O U U D J . A -+ to Cn Copyright The following drawings are instruments of service to the Landscape Architect. They are not products of design. All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and the property of the designer, and were created, evolved, and developed for use on and in connection with the specified project. None of such ideas, designs, arrangements, or plans shall be used by or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written permission of the designer. Job No. Drawn By Checked By Approved By Submittal Dates 3-04-21 4-14-21 Revision Dates 2020-39 TT MH MH 12-17-21 6-01-21 SP-2 Page 290 of 381 r-- 6,463 sf / 0.15 Ac. ZONE "AE" (BFE 5) i Wetland Line Typ. Indian River Lagoon Proposed 20-Slip Dock (± 4,300 sf) Pile Mooring Typ. 41 + 40' 5' Boardwalk Connection N24032'11 "W 625.48' 0 Pile Mooring 4.0 4.1 4.2 Approximate Sounding 4.5 in feet, M LW Typ. 4.5 4.7 4.8 5.1 4.2 4.5 4.7 4.7 5.1 5.2 5.4 5.5 "--�5 0' R (PER ORB 2640, PG 2402) y W W W = W W W W N89056'21 "E w W y y W W angrOVe�" Weiland W W W W 21.35' + l� �N *50' MFteL W W IO 44Ac. i 2 v u u v w/ �. y Setback, � / 26 y W W y -,MHWL 0.7 23 J 1.1 1.3 Mean High Water Line (± 711 LF) 1.4 Wetland Line Typ. 1.5 4' Proposed � Dock 1.6 J C ca 2.4 Q L.L 2.9 ± 279' co 3.1 X L- ^ i L 4' Q 3.3 Q 3.5 �v • ± 40' • ± 347' Pile Mooring Typ. 3.8 4.5 Approximate Sounding 4.7 in feet, M LW Typ. 4.8 5.0 5.0 5.3 5.4 Parking Space Detail WHITE STRIPING -� TYP. BLUE 71711 STRIPING TYP. WHITE WHITE 00 LOGO\ STRIPING TYP, '% WHITE STRIPING a TYP. ❑NLY 12' 5' 10' ($250 FINE NOTES: FTP 25 1. TOP PORTION OF FTP 25 & 26 SHALL HAVE A REFLECTIVE BLUE BACKGROUND WITH WHITE REFLECTIVE SYMBOL AND BORDER. 2. BOTTOM PORTION SHALL HAVE A REFLECTIVE WHITE BACKGROUND WITH BLACK OPAQUE LEGEND AND BORDER 3. FTP 25 & 26 MAY BE FABRICATED ON ONE PANEL OR TWO. 4. FTP 25 IS FOR USE IN AREAS WHERE SPACE IS LIMITED N.T.S. Dumpster Enclosure w/ 6' Wall Detail N.T.S. ' n, CLEAR '[INOTE1 il' aEAR 8" W CONCRETE SLAB WITH 10110WWM.(fc' = 3000 psi) z8" CONCRETE BLOCK WALL W/ STUCCO (BOTH SIDES) W/ FILLED CELLS 8 I #5 BAR AT LOCATIONS SHOWN UST BE hl INEE ONING FLIGHT OF SERVICULAR LL ICLE. 24'-0" B' CONCRETE BLOCK WALLS W/ STUCCO _____J ___ --, _______ � ______F ___ r - I t y• � \ I ~R CYCLE •� I �,�\ I I -`/ I •r I I {11�MP5P-i I , _ % �• •-- - ��`� I 1�- ` A<`�- \,, ,�- I I I 1 1 8" BAND ------- ---------- 8' x 8" BOND BEAM W/ 2 #5 BARS CONT. STUCCO �^ 12'-0" 8' Opaque Vinyl Fence Detail Post Centers 96" Max i Actual Panel Dimensions: 96" Tall 94.25" Wide 5" x 5" Post 142"-----mom --------------------------- Approximate Post Height Ground Level -------------------------------------- 95" Stiffener Length 1.5" x 1.5" 18 Guage Galvanized Steel Stiffener Concrete footing diameter Onto 12" min and 46" to 4B" deep min in accordance with local conditions, codes, and standard building practices. HINGES SHALL BE OUTSIDE OF 11' CLEAR AREA 12" x 18" CONCRETE FOOTING W1 3 #5 BARS CONT. 4" DIA. x 42" HIGH STEEL BOLLARD W/18, EMBEDDEDINTO CONCRETE RECYCLE DUMPTSER SIGN 100% OPAQUE GATES {SOLID WOOD OR METAL SHEETING} WITH STEEL FRAMES N.T.S. Minimum top of ppost to ground level Ground Level %n- tSn Hole Depth 10" -12" Hole Diameter Scale: 1" = 40' %?m6mm? 1 0' 20' 40' 80' 120' 0 North 50 E. Ocean Blvd., Suite 101 Stuart, Florida 34994 T 772.678.7200 F 772.678.7201 www.hjadesignstudio.com LA 0000905 10, l-^ i O U C: M U 0. ■ r4'a ■ Copyright The following drawings are instruments of service to the Landscape Architect. They are not products of design. All ideas, designs, arrangements, and plans indicated or represented by this drawing are owned by and the property of the designer, and were created, evolved, and developed for use on and in connection with the specified project. None of such ideas, designs, arrangements, or plans shall be used by or disclosed to any person, firm, or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without the written permission of the designer. Job No. 2020-39 Drawn By TT Checked By MH Approved By MH Submittal Dates 12-17-21 3-04-21 4-14-21 6-01-21 Revision Dates SP-3 Page 291 of 381 0 -- ENVIRONMENTAL TA]L RESOURCES FINAL REPORT TO: Jodi Nentwick, Planning & Development Services Department THROUGH: Amy E. Griffin, Environmental Resources Director FROM: Aimee L. Cooper, Environmental Regulations Manager DATE: December 2, 2021 SUBJECT: Seaside Resort CUMj-11202126233 Background The Environmental Resources Department (ERD) is in receipt of the November 15, 2021 date -stamped submittal from Planning and Development Services. The applicant requests approval of a Major Adjustment to a Conditional Use to amend Condition of Approval number 3 of the recorded approval order, Resolution 2021-306, for the oceanfront resort known as Seaside Resort (aka Ouanalao Resort). The Major Site Plan (MJSP-12202025912) was approved and recorded July 23, 2021 (Resolution No. 2021-312) to construct a resort with 25 villas adjacent to the ocean, 25 cottages, and resort amenities such as a clubhouse which will include a conference room, restaurant with indoor and outdoor seating, a fitness facility, and a pool, along with associated parking and stormwater infrastructure, and landscaping. The subject site has a previously approved Major Site Plan and Conditional Use known as Tesoro Beach Club (Resolution 05-137), recorded on June 15, 2006. The property has approximately 1,198 linear feet of Atlantic Ocean frontage and 710 linear feet of Indian River Lagoon frontage. The +/- 15.40-acre project site is located on South Hutchinson Island at TBD South AlA, approximately 3.5 miles north of the Martin County line. Findings The proposed Major Adjustment to a Conditional Use is not anticipated to have any undue adverse environmental impacts. An Environmental Impact Report consistent with LDC 11.02.09.A.5 was provided for the Major Site Plan approval and included an assessment of onsite habitats, listed species surveys, and details regarding avoidance and minimization of impacts to natural resources. No intact native habitats will be impacted, as the proposed development area consists primarily of disturbed lands which were cleared as part of the previously approved Tesoro Major Site Plan. The remaining native habitat within the dune preservation zone will continue to be preserved and managed in perpetuity as detailed in the protective conservation easement in favor of the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP, recorded in ORB 2424, Page 292) and associated Preserve Area Monitoring and Management Plan (PAMMP). The developer provided an updated Conservation Easement, including an updated PAMMP and Dune Restoration Plan, recorded September 24, 2021, Official Record Book (ORB) 4691 Pages 454- 474. An Affidavit to record the Sea Turtle Protection Plan (STPP) was completed October 8, 2021, ORB 4699 Pages 1982-2000. Recommendation The Environmental Resources Department has no objection to the approval of the Major Adjustment to a Conditional Use. Please contact Aimee Cooper at 772-462-6440 if you have any questions or would like to meet regarding the details of these requirements. ST. LUCIE WaRKP Page 292 of 381 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Meetin_g_Time._ 6:00 PM (or soon thereafter } Richard Coluccio 248 Avenue A Doylestown PA 18901 Location: BOCC Chambers SLC Administration Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL 34982 APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: Lee Heaton Seaside 20, LLC 2777 Royal Poinciana Way, Suite 156 Palm Beach, FL 33480 PROJECT LOCATION: 7700 S. Ocean Drive Jensen Beach, FL 34951 Parcel ID Numbers: 3522-343-0001-000-3 3522-344-0001-000-6 3522-344-0002-000-3 3522-342-0002-000-7 FUTURE LAND USE: RIM (Residential, Medium) east side RU (Residential, Urban) west side EXISTING ZONING: HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the pro- posed Conditional Use Adjustment to revised the unit owner length of stay restriction for the approved Seaside (aka Ouanalao) Resort Tourist ap- proved to contain fifty (50) lodging units, clubhouse, restaurant and ac- cessory docking facility on 15.40 acres of land located within the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District. Public Hearing Notice Tuesday, February 1, 2022 Notice of Proposed Major Adjustment to Conditional Use Permit for Seaside (aka Ouanalao) Resort This notice has been provided to owners of property within 500 feet of the proposed petition. Project Description Seaside 20, LLC is requesting a Major Adjustment to the existing Seaside (aka Ouanalao) Resort Conditional Use Permit to amend the owner's length of stay re- strictions for the approved project located within the Hutchinson Island Residential District (HIRD) Zoning District located at 7700 S. Ocean Drive in St Lucie County, Florida. Currently, the Conditional Use states that resort unit owners shall not stay in their units for more than 185 calendar days per year. The proposed modification seeks to re- place the preceding restriction with the requirement that "No less than 70% of all room nights (18,250) in any calendar year shall be offered to the public (not the unit owner) for rent." The revised condition maintains that all resort units be placed in the rental pro- gram run by resort management and made available for rental by the public when the owner of the unit is not staying in the unit while adding provisions for re- porting compliance to the County. Background On July 6, 2021, the Board of County Commissioners granted approval (Resolution 2021-306) for a conditional use permit to develop a tourist court resort and alcohol waiver for on -premises con- sumption accessory to the tourist court resort pursuant to Section 7.10.11(A). The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners has the power to review and grant any applications within their area of responsibility. The Board of County Commissioners strongly encourages your input and com- ment at the public hearing. You may also mail, email or fax written comments in advance of the public hearing for inclusion in the official record regarding this pro- ceeding. Written comments to the Board of County Commissioners should be re- ceived by the Planning and Develop- ment Services Department — Planning Division at least 3 days prior to the sched- uled hearing. Anyone with a disability requiring accom- modations to attend this meeting may contact the SLC Community Risk Manag- er at least 48 hours in advance at (772) 462-1546 or TDD (772) 462-1428. Further details are available in the Plan- ning and Development Services Depart- ment - Please contact: Staff: Jodi Nentwick-Kugler Tel: (772) 462-1580 Email: NentwickJ@stlucieco.org Mail 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce. FL 34982 Date Mailed: Friday, January 21, 2022 Page 293 of 381 AFFIDAVIT COMPLIANCE WITH POSTING OF NOTICE REQUIREMENTS STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF St. Lucie Lee Heaton , being first duly sworn deposes and states: 1. 1 am the owner or the agent for the project known as Seaside Resort Major Adjustment to the Conditional Use for the following petition: File No. CUMj-11202126233. 2. 1 hereby certify that I have complied with the notice requirements set forth in Section 11.00.03.E of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code for the Board of County Commissioners public hearing to be conducted on February 1, 2022. The required sign was printed and posted to the specifications listed on the Sign Content and Sign Requirements forms, provided by the St Lucie County Planning and Development Services - Planning Division, on January 24, 2022. The following required documentation is attached: A. Dated Photo submitted electronically (Close up) B. Dated Photo submitted electronically (Distant) Further affiant sayeth not. 62 Signature of Affiant STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this -Aday of , 20' by l� Said person ✓ is personally kno n to me, _ produced a driver's license issued by a state of the United States within the last five (5) years as identification, or_ produced other identification, to wit E NANCY LYN GAUTHIER Notary Public . State of F►orida Commission # HH 076444 ty My Comm. Expires Feb 21, 2025 Notary Public,ed through National Notary Assn. , Im t% - Typed or Printed Name of Notary Commission No.: I&O104W My Commission expires: Z 21-2OZS' Revised 3/16/2011 Page 294 of 381 r Aw _ #tm%, A hOTICE OFF U BLOC HEARING I*Wmmm amen ��� �o■ IM �* Rom■ Cw� Fl�lt � �� ��� r■� �' � w 1ri�w�r�r,rM him wa IN ftl UMC" MNW&W formes �'"� ON If" lmft wetly M uirm r N A4 �"ftf� ° I Imom"m y '15age 295 of 381 26.4 _ s- d� $ �_ _ JWAX=w %� .JUk Page 296 of 381 Igo 4L Ir T4, br, lb A.Crt '. -. lh t 4r -47 A V Page 297090,f r-- Amm _ f • to • y } r • a' ! tM1 a � f L { • �• t a a ail a i NOME 4FPL:. LUM M 4%Cl ftr 1 tm" i�I Pll Yir 6- tim— FI "-I RFI YI �47rr1 ■■I Y�r71}j ��1■J FqiYIY"ilk IiGbm.km ���M4�MY�Ywr rim ri ■ rii PF �P* om*q kp It4t 4a 9R PELi 6w �Y■t .7 4r r• . ki :Mi FYr+■IFNidM 1 *MWiPi ■ � ��r .t=ip rr MR JPPP Plpr PM 1 DNE 44 ldh-fir'■ rYY M uwd Ypwr'74p� �1t f 1p: �' : 7r -V �i.i - - r t.• } i JL lod rig e 3 60 '07 1 to N O co, Subject Parcel N \ O � - O ' O co k Subject Parcel Parcel Boundaries Seaside Resort Aerial CUMj-11202126233 0Awe In 0 0 125 250 500 750 Feet N Map prepared 12/2ON66 302 of,381 ST LUL1E COUNTY y� Seaside Resort Future s C U M i-11202126233 Land Use CPUB P/F CPUB e RHO RH ee Legend - FLU Codes N ®Subject Parcel CPUB, Conservation Public 0 250 500 750 P/F, Public Facilities w E RU, Residential Urban, 5 du/ac Feet RM, Residential Medium, 9 du/ac RH, Residential High, 15 du/ac Map prepared 12/20/2021 Page 3%4 of 381 Seaside Resort C U M i-11202126233 owners mahout OMEN" �\ � —. N O O ..,.\ 0000 Subject Parcel N 500ft Notification Area o 400 80o WI E Parcels within 500ft Notification Area Feet Map prepared 12/20/2021 Pe- Resort 2126233 Page 306 of 381 Seaside Resort Zoning CUM'-11202126233 'INCPUB U CPUB , , , HIRD , , , , , , , , 7.ffETD] 0 SLC - Zoning Codes N m Subject Parcel CPUB, Conservation Public 400 200 0 400 HIRD, Hutchinson Island Residential Dist Feet W = I, Institutional U, Utilities Map prepared 12/20/2021 Page 3¢g of 381 ko LUCE 0 AGENDA REQUEST TO: Board of County Commissioners 9.A.2. ORD-2022-2 PUBLIC HEARINGS - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DATE: 2/1/2022 *ORDINANCE ITEM - LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT AMENDMENT QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEM? NO PRESENTED BY: Monica Graziani, Building & Code Regulation Manager SUBMITTED BY: Planning & Development Services SUBJECT: Staff Initiated Text Amendment to the Land Development Code to Establish Stormwater Design Standards for Single-family and Duplex Infill Development - 2nd Reading of the Ordinance BACKGROUND: The purpose of this text amendment to the Land Development Code, Chapter VII, Development Design and Improvement Standards, Section 7.04.01 D.3 - Area, Yard, Height, and Open Space Requirements, Filled Lands, is to establish requirements for a stormwater grading plan for single-family and duplex infill development. Currently, applicants for infill development execute a Filled Lands Affidavit, stating the owner shall be responsible for assuring adequate drainage so the immediate community will not be adversely affected. Infill development in an established neighborhood is constructed at higher elevations than the older adjacent homes. Thus, the runoff from the infill lot impacts the neighboring properties. It is difficult for staff to address complaints from citizens affected by new infill development because there are no stormwater design standards. The proposed ordinance was drafted to provide a Do -It -Yourself method of determining the required stormwater swale for infill development of single-family and duplexes. The homeowner or contractor could prepare the stormwater grading plan without retaining the services of a design professional. The Treasure Coast Builder's Association has provided a letter of support regarding the text amendment. Also, the County's Public Works Director, Assistant Director, and County Engineer have reviewed the proposed text amendment and offer no objections. The Planning and Zoning Commission unanimously approved the item on October 21, 2021. The Board unanimously approved this item on the first reading of the ordinance on January 11, 2022. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Page 308 of 381 Staff recommends the Board approve the second reading of the ordinance to establish stormwater grading requirements for infill of single-family and duplex development. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures Date: January 19, 2022 Benjamin Balcer, Planning & Development Services Assistant Director Date: January 24, 2022 Leslie Olson, Planning & Development Services Director Date: January 24, 2022 Don West, Public Works Director Date: January 24, 2022 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: January 26, 2022 Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator Page 309 of 381 'Mr TO: Board of County Commissioners THROUGH: Leslie Olson, AICP, Director Benjamin Balcer, AICP, Assistant Director Planning and Development Services Department Building & Code Regulation Division MEMORANDUM FROM: Monica Graziani, Building & Code Regulation Manager, Code Compliance, Planning & Development Services DATE: December 14, 2021 SUBJECT: Staff Initiated Text Amendment to the Land Development Code Chapter 7.04.0l .D.3. — Area, Yard, Height, and Open Space Requirement, Filled Lands (TLDC-8202126114) The purpose of this staff -initiated text amendment is to address the challenging issue of stormwater runoff from infill development —the text amendment to the Land Development Code, Chapter 7.04.01.D.3. — Area, Yard, Height, and Open Space Requirement, Filled Lands, is to establish requirements for a stormwater grading plan for single-family and duplex infill development. The amendment proposes a DO-IT- YOURSELF process. The new requirement will not significantly increase the cost to build a home in St. Lucie County. BACKGROUND The staff routinely receives complaints from citizens about new homes constructed on infill lots built at much higher elevations. Infill housing is building a new house in an established older neighborhood on a vacant lot. The parcel may have always been undeveloped, or an older home demolished. This type of development causes flooding issues on the neighboring properties. The developer of an infill project must consider the elevation of the existing adjacent properties to ensure that the new construction does not affect them. The current permitting process requires an applicant building a new home to execute a Filled Lands Affidavit. The Affidavit states the owner shall be responsible for assuring adequate drainage so that the immediate community will not be adversely affected. However, there are no design standards or guidelines to ensure the stormwater runoff doesn't flow onto the adjacent properties. The lack of design standards creates challenges for staff. There are inconsistencies in how to address the stormwater runoff and no enforcement mechanism. This text amendment is a reasonable effort to reduce the impacts of stormwater runoff onto adjacent properties. There are many ways to address stormwater runoff; however, to keep it simple, the staff proposes using a swale system to manage the stormwater runoff. It seems logical to design the swale around the house along the rear lot line and both sides of the parcel to the roadside Swale or other approved outfall. ST. LUCIE Page 310 of 381 Project Name: LDC Text Amendment (7.04.01 D.3-Filled Lands Affidavit) File No.: TLDC-8202126114 The Treasure Coast Builders Association reviewed the proposed text amendment and offered no objections, see attached letter. Also, the County Public Work's Director, Mr. Don West, has reviewed and supports the amendment. The proposed text amendment provides a mathematical formula that the homeowner or builder can use to do the calculation themselves without the aid of an engineer to determine the size of the drainage Swale. A homeowner with a typical 7500 square foot lot (75' x 100') would be required to construct a drainage swale 8 inches in depth and 1 foot in width. The proposed amendment provides standards to capture the stormwater runoff. Below are highlights of the proposed standards: 1. Limit the amount of fill placed on a site 2. The finished floor shall be no greater than three feet above the crown of the road. 3. The plan shall include roof drainage. 4. The stormwater grading plan shall provide a swale design along the lot's perimeter, rear to front drainage flow. 5. Swales shall be no greater than 2 feet in width. 6. Swales must be maintained. 7. An approved final inspection of the stormwater grading plan is required for a certificate of occupancy. TEXT AMENDMENT STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTIONi 11.06.03, ST. LUCH COUNTY LAND DEVELOPAJ Eli T CODE According to St. Lucie County Land Development Code Section 11.06.03, the following standards are met, and the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: A. Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The proposed text amendment is consistent with the Land Development Code and has met the review standards in Section 11.06.03. The proposed text amendment would establish stormwater grading standards for single-family and duplex infill development. B. Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with any elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed text amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The following specific goals, objectives, and policies from the Comprehensive Plan support the proposed Land Development Code Text Amendment: Goal 1.1: Ensure the highest quality living environment possible through a mixture of land uses reflecting the needs and desires of the residents and how they want their community to develop. The goal shall be implemented by strictly enforced building, zoning, and development codes based on objectives and policies that will enhance St. Lucie County's natural and man-made resources while minimizing any damage or threat of degradation to the health, safety, and welfare of the County's citizens, native wildlife and environment, through incompatible land uses. ST. LUCIE Page 311 of 381 Project Name: LDC Text Amendment (7.04.01 D.3-Filled Lands Affidavit) File No.: TLDC-8202126114 Policy 1.1.4.1 — Regulate areas subject to seasonal and periodic flooding and provide drainage and stormwater management. C. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses. The proposed text amendment is not inconsistent with existing or proposed land uses. The ordinance intends to establish stormwater standards for single-family and duplex infill development to reduce runoff impacts to adjacent properties. D. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment. The proposed amendment seeks to reduce adverse impacts to adjacent properties from infill development. The is not a new issue. As infill development continues in the County, excessive fill on infill parcel, and changing weather patterns, it is necessary to establish design standards to help reduce runoff impacts. E. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities. The proposed text amendment will not result in additional demands on public facilities. The amendment addresses site -specific, infill development of single-family and duplex lots to provide swales to retain runoff from the increased impervious surface on the parcel. F. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment. All development activities are required to adhere to the current environmental resource protection standards of review. G. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would adversely affect the property values in the area. The proposed amendment would not adversely affect the property value in the area. H. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would not result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative effects of such patterns. The proposed amendment to reduce stormwater runoff to adjacent properties would not impact development patterns. I. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this code. The proposed amendment is not in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this code. J. Any other matters that may be deemed appropriate by the Planning and Zoning Commission or the Board of County Commissioners, in review and consideration of the proposed amendment. The Planning and Zoning Commission and the Board of County Commissioners may raise other matters regarding the proposed Land Development Code Text Amendment. ST. LUCIE Page 312 of 381 Project Name: LDC Text Amendment (7.04.01 D.3-Filled Lands Affidavit) File No.: TLDC-8202126114 Planning and Zoning Commission The permission to advertise the agenda item was approved by the Board on September 27, 2021. The Planning and Zoning Commission heard the item on October 21, 2021 and voted 9 — 0 to forward the amendment with a recommendation of approval with the following suggestions: 1. Allow other types of stormwater conveyance systems such as a canal system 2. Mandate roof drainage such as a gutter system 3. Allow maximum height of fill for a site to exceed 36 inches if designed by an Engineer; and, the design must include additional stormwater retention above this Code to be approved by the Planning & Development Services Director. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff finds the proposed text amendment to meet the standards of review as outlined in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The Board unanimously approved the first reading of the ordinance on January 11, 2022; and, scheduled the second reading of the ordinance for February 1, 2020. Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the text amendment. ST. LUCIE 4 Page 313 of 381 Sample Typical Lot Drainage Flow 10' Side Building Setback I I I I I I I M I � I I I I 25' Front Building Setback Pavement or Unimproved Roadway Centerline of Road Note: This is a typical 75' x 134' lot. Various Exceptions can apply. 44 ST. LUCIE COUNTY PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES *� 2300 VIRGINA AVE FORT PIERCE, FL 34982 30' Rear Setback Exhibit A TYPICAL LOT Drainage Swale 10' Side Building Setback Add Drainage Flow Arrows (If Swale in Right of Way) Drainage Flow DETAIL: EXHIBIT A DATE:2021 SCALE: N.T.S. SHPUgel a141 of Building A► Better Tomorrow. P. Scott McCracken President Steve Torres First Vice President Keith Frederick Second Vice President Samuel Hjalmeby Treasurer Kelly Johnson Secretary Michael Johnston Inrnrediate Past President Maddie Williams Executive Director 772/336-8222 St. Lucie/Martin 772/562-8222 Indian River 863/467-2007 Okeechobee 772/461-4054 Fax AIGAIia[e NAHB. National Association of Home Builders MARTIN • ST. LUCIE • INDIAN RIVER • OKEECHOBEE TREASURE COAST BUILDERS ASSOCIATION October 19, 2021 Mr. Christopher Dzadovsky, Chairman St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 RE: Building Department proposed text amendment on drainage requirement for infill development Commissioner Dzadovsky, Please accept his letter into the public record as our support for the proposed text amendment to the Land Development Code to establish design standards for single- family and duplex infill development. We want to thank the staff for including us in this process. The Board of Directors of the TCBA recognizes the effort to address an important community issue; and, keep the cost at a minimum for the builder and homeowner. Sincerely, e7 -- • Samuel H' meby President Cc: Commissioner Sean Mitchell, Vice -Chair Commissioner Cathy Townsend Commissioner Frannie Hutchison Commissioner Linda Bartz 6560 South Federal Highway • Port St. Lucie, Florida 34952 f b/y � N ] FLORIDA HOh1E Email: maddie@treasurecoastba.com Website: www.treasurecoastba.com �/M a Le :ASSOCIATION age o 81 Ordinance No. LDC Text Amendment File No. TLDC-8202126114 ORDINANCE No. 2022-2 FILE NO.: TLDC-8202126114 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE TEXT OF THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, CHAPTER VII, DEVELOPMENT DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS, SECTION 7.04.01.D.3. — AREA, YARD, HEIGHT, AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT, FILLED LANDS; TO ESTABLISH REQUIREMENTS FOR A STORMWATER GRADING PLAN FOR SINGLE-FAMILY AND DUPLEX INFILL DEVELOPMENT THAT DOES NOT HAVE AN APPROVED MASTER DRAINAGE PERMIT FROM THE WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; PROVIDING SIMPLE DESIGN STANDARDS; PROVIDING FOR PERPETUAL MAINTENANCE OF THE STORMWATER CONVEYANCE SYSTEM; PROVIDING COMPLIANCE BEFORE THE ISSUANCE OF A CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND CODIFICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, (Board) recognizes that land development permanently alters how stormwater flows across a site due to grading, compaction, and the installation of impervious materials; and impervious areas increase the amount of rainwater runoff and may cause flooding; and WHEREAS, new infill single-family and duplex development shall be responsible to protect adjacent properties from adverse impacts due to uncontrolled runoff and make sure there is an adequate stormwater conveyance system so that adjacent neighbors will not be adversely affected; and, WHEREAS, the St. Lucie County Land Development Code currently requires all permittees to execute a Filled Lands Affidavit assuring adequate drainage so that the immediate community will not be adversely affected; and WHEREAS, the St. Lucie County Land Development Code does not currently provide stormwater design standards for single-family and duplex infill development; and WHEREAS, many communities along the Treasure Coast have stormwater standards for single-family and duplex infill development to minimize runoff to adjacent properties; and Page 1 of 8 Page 316 of 381 Ordinance No. LDC Text Amendment File No. TLDC-8202126114 WHEREAS, the County acknowledges these regulations will not solve all stormwater- related issues; however, this is a reasonable effort to reduce the impacts of stormwater runoff from single-family and duplex infill development on adjacent properties; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners desires to implement a simple method to calculate the swale flow area, including standards for a stormwater lot grading plan for infill single-family and duplex development, subject to the terms and conditions of this Ordinance. WHEREAS, on October 21, 2021, the Local Planning Agency/Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed Ordinance after publishing due notice in the St. Lucie News Tribune and recommended the proposed Ordinance be forwarded with a recommendation for approval. WHEREAS, on January 11, 2022, this Board held the first public hearing on the proposed Ordinance after publishing due notice in the St. Lucie News Tribune. WHEREAS, on February 1, 2022, this Board held its second public hearing on the proposed Ordinance, after publishing due notice in the St. Lucie News Tribune. WHEREAS, the proposed amendment to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, are internally consistent with the remainder of the Land Development Code, and are in the best interest of the health, safety, and public welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. INCORPORATION OF RECITALS. The above recitals are incorporated herein by reference and form an integral part of the Ordinance. PART B. SHORT TITLE. This Ordinance shall be known and referred to as the Infill Development Stormwater Plan. PART C. INTENT AND PURPOSE. The intent and purpose of this Ordinance is to create simple design standards for infill single-family and duplex development. Page 2 of 8 Page 317 of 381 Ordinance No. LDC Text Amendment File No. TLDC-8202126114 PART D. CHAPTER 7.04.01.13.3. — AREA, YARD, HEIGHT, AND OPEN SPACE REQUIREMENT, FILLED LANDS. 7.04.01.D.3. — Filled Lands. Where fill is used, the owners of the property on which the fill is being located shall be responsible for assuring adequate drainage so that the immediate community will not be adversely affected. All permittees are required to execute a Filled Lands Affidavit with an application for a building permit. The Affidavit shall include an acknowledgment to retain an engineer or other design professional if the stormwater grading plan fails and that the applicant agrees to hold St. Lucie County harmless for any future drainage rework that may be reauired as a result. A. Requirements for Stormwater Grading Plan for Single -Family and Duplex Infill Development This section uses simple design standards to avoid the necessity of complex engineering calculations and analysis. The applicant may, however, choose to retain the services of an engineer at their expense. 1. Purpose This section provides stormwater runoff standards for infill residential development within the unincorporated County to protect existing structures from adverse impacts of uncontrolled runoff from infill construction. 2. Definitions Bio-swale means a storm water runoff conveyance system that can absorb low flows or carry runoff from heavy rains to storm sewer inlets or directly to surface waters; and, for the purposes of this Code, it is a long, channeled depression or trench that receives rainwater runoff (from the roof of the residence) and has vegetation (such as grasses, flowering herbs, and shrubs) and organic matter (such as mulch) to slow water infiltration and filter out pollutants. Cistern, rainwater, means a waterproof reservoir for catching rainwater; it may be connected to a roof putter system and downspouts that directs the rainwater to the storage cistern; and it may be located above ground or underground, and built of various materials. Elevated building means a non -basement building which has its lowest elevated floor raised above ground level by foundation walls, shear walls, post, piers, pilings, or columns. Fill means a volume of earthen material that is placed and compacted for the purpose of filling in a hole or depression to create a structure that, when placed, changes the grade or elevation of the receiving site. Page 3 of 8 Page 318 of 381 Ordinance No. LDC Text Amendment File No. TLDC-8202126114 Infill Lot Development means developing parcels within areas without a master drainage plan. Lot means a tract, plot, or portion of land intended as a unit for immediate or future use, transfer of ownership, or building development. Grading Plan means a plan that delineates the shaping and grading of the land to direct surface runoff away from the structure and towards a swale or other stormwater conveyance system. Rain garden, means a shallow dug -out area that is landscaped with native plants and designed to collect stormwater runoff that comes from nearby impermeable surfaces, such as roofs, driveways, and sidewalks. Slope means a surface that rises at an angle; slope is the measure of the steepness nf a line_ Stormwater means any surface flow, runoff, and drainage consisting entirely of water from any form of natural precipitation and resulting from such rain. Swale means a valley -like section of two slopes on a piece of land or a low place on a piece of land that is often wet with stormwater 3. Applicability; Exemption; Waiver The provisions of this section shall only apply to development within the unincorporated county boundaries for lots being developed that do not have an approved stormwater management plan. Any development subject to this section must be designed to minimize directed runoff to an adjacent property. Additions or accessory structures less than 300 square feet have a one-time exemption from this section. The property owners of substantial acreage may demonstrate there is no need for a stormwater management plan; in that event, the Department Director may waive the requirement for a stormwater management plan. 4. Requirements. All applicants that propose to develop a single family home or duplex on infill property shall: Page 4 of 8 a. Submit a topographic survey that identifies existing conditions within and adjacent to the lot, including the finish floor elevation of any adjacent structures. The survey shall include a minimum of four (4) elevations along each property line to include the corners of the lot. The survey shall have been completed within six (6) months of building permit submittal. Page 319 of 381 Ordinance No. LDC Text Amendment File No. TLDC-8202126114 b. Submit a stormwater grading plan specifying the elevations as noted in `a, above, and include lot type, swale locations, spot elevations, flow direction arrows. side sloDe of 4 to 1. north directional arrow and scale. floor area calculation, a yard basin if applicable, retaining wall details if applicable. C. Limit the amount of fill on the lot; the amount of fill shall be the minimum necessary for the construction of the buildina. d. Note foundation construction methods. The foundation grade, fill, shall be limited to 18" not to exceed 36" for an elevated buildina (a buildina on Diles. stilts. stem wall. etc.) a. If an applicant wants to build the foundation grade with fill greater than 36 inches, a stormwater management plan designed by an engineer is required; and, the design must include additional stormwater retention above this Code section to be approved by the Planning & Development Services Director. 2. Alternative methods of construction that are not listed above in d.1 may be considered, however, a report from an engineer is required to demonstrate compliance with this code. e. Limit the finished floor elevation of the ground floor to be no more than three (3) feet above the crown of the road unless required by the Florida Building Code or the State of Florida Health Department; or other constraint shall require a stormwater grading plan and report by a Drofessional enaineer to be aDDroved by the Plannina & Development Services Director. Page 5 of 8 Pumps for on -site sewage disposal systems (septic tank and drain fields) may be required if a gravity drain field causes the finished floor elevation to be higher than specified in 4 (e). Limit the maximum slope of fill on a lot so that the slope does not exceed 4-1 _ g. Include roof drainage provisions such as gutters and splash pads/downspouts, so that the runoff is directed away from the adjacent lot toward the stormwater conveyance system. h. Construct a swale along the back property line of the lot with a high point in the middle of the swale along the rear lot line. The swale shall slope from the high point to the side lot lines on both sides and continue Page 320 of 381 Ordinance No. LDC Text Amendment File No. TLDC-8202126114 to the front property line roadside swale or other approved outfall. Swales shall be no greater than 2 feet in width unless otherwise approved. See Section 5 Swale Flow Area Ratio Value Table. If an alternate method of design is proposed, the applicant has the option to provide an engineered plan. When conditions are extreme, and there is a need for an additional type of conveyance system, the applicant may consider retaining walls, berms, piping, or yard drains to aid in directing runoff to the conveyance system. A retaining wall design, berm, use of an existing canal system or a piping plan on site shall require a plan prepared by an engineer. The use of a canal system may require permits for regulatory agency. The outfall piped conveyance system shall be required to be maintained. i. Sod all swales to prevent erosion, unless used as a rain garden. L Convey off -site runoff that flows to or through the lot to the adjacent roadside or other approved outfall. New construction shall not block thic flrnni k. Encourage alternative stormwater designs, (such as cisterns, bio-swales and rain gardens) to prevent runoff to adjacent property. 5. Swale Flow Area - Any applicant may use the method of determining adequate flow area using the below Table: Step 1. Determine water flow patterns on the protect site and outfall (where the flow exits the property). Step 2. Determine water flow area size by calculating the width and length of the affected site. Step 3. Using the Table below, determine the swale flow area by finding the impervious area of building footprint in the first column and identifying the column of water flow area size from step 2 above. Step 4. Using the Table below, if the value is between the rows and columns, chose the swale flow area ratio value of the next row and column in the Table. Step 5. The following equation shall be used to calculate the dimensions of the swale flow area: Swale Death = (Swale Flow Area Ratio from Steos 3 or 4) x 2.0 x (width of Swale = 1.0 Page 6 of 8 Page 321 of 381 Ordinance No. LDC Text Amendment File No. TLDC-8202126114 Swale Flow Area Ratio Value Table Proposed Water Flow Area Size (from step 2. In Square Feet) Impervious Area +in sq.R. 1000 5000 10,890 15,000 21,780 30,000 40,001) 1200 0.12 0.19 0.29 0.36 0.48 0.62 0.80 2500 0.23 0.30 0.40 0.47 0.59 0.73 0.91 3000 0.27 0.34 0.44 0.51 0.63 0.78 0.95 4000 0.35 0.42 0.53 0.60 0.72 0.86 1.03 5000 0.44 0.51 0.61 0.68 0.80 0.94 1.12 7500 0.65 0.72 0.82 0.89 1.01 1.15 1.33 6. Maintenance PerDetual maintenance of the stormwater convevance system, includina alternative conveyance systems, shall be the responsibility of the owner of the improved propertV. The maintenance shall include the routine mowing any growth of grass, weeds, flora, or underbrush within the swale area to a height of eight inches or less; removing trash, debris, or litter; and removing any obstructions that impede stormwater drainage. 7. Compliance A final stormwater inspection shall be performed for compliance with the approved stormwater aradina Dlan Drior to the issuance of a Certificate of OCCUDancv. PART E. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby superseded by this Ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART F. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this Ordinance. If this Ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART G. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This Ordinance shall be applicable in the unincorporated area of St. Lucie County. PART H. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. Page 7 of 8 Page 322 of 381 Ordinance No. LDC Text Amendment File No. TLDC-8202126114 The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART I. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. PART J. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this Ordinance was as follows: Sean Mitchell, Chair XXX Frannie Hutchinson, Vice -Chair XXX Linda Bartz, Commissioner XXX Chris Dzadovsky, Commissioner XXX Cathy Townsend, Commissioner XXX PART K. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this Ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Lucie County Code and Compiled Laws, and the word 'ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered or re -lettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through H shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ENACTED this day of 12022. Attest: Board of County Commissioners St. Lucie County, Florida Deputy Clerk Page 8 of 8 By: Chair Approved As to Form and Correctness: By: County Attorney Page 323 of 381 TO: PRESENTED BY SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: AGENDA REQUEST Board of County Commissioners Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney County Attorney 10.A.1. 2022-54665 REGULAR AGENDA - COUNTY ATTORNEY DATE: 2/1/2022 *ACTION ITEM - BOARD APPROVAL QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEM? No Opioid Litigation - Proposed Settlements with Endo Health Solutions, Inc. and Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., ("Endo")(collectively, "Settling Defendants") St. Lucie County has filed suit against various companies including the Distributors and Settling Defendants referenced above in what has been referred to as the "National Prescription Opiate Litigation". On January 22, 2022, the County Attorney received the attached email from the firm representing the County in Litigation. As indicated in the email, there is a "Participation Agreement" that the firm is recommending that the Board approve on or before February 9, 2022. Statewide Allocation Agreement Settlement funds will flow into the state and then be allocated between the state and its local governments. The County previously passed a resolution which approved a Memorandum of Understanding ("MOU") with the state in an effort to fairly apportion settlement funds between the state and its local governments. It was contemplated the MOU would be reduced to a formal agreement consistent with the MOU. By executing the Participation Agreement (discussed further below), the County is accepting the terms of the Agreement. Process The County's litigation team has asked that the County advise them by email of the County's position no later than February 9, 2022 whether the County supports the proposed settlement. Litigation Team Recommendation The County's litigation team believes that the proposed settlement represents a fair and equitable resolution of opioid-related claims against Endo for the reasons stated in the email attached. Page 324 of 381 PREVIOUS ACTION: On March 18, 2019, the City of Fort Pierce entered into a Contingent Fee Retainer Agreement with Michael Kahn, P.A.; Romano Law Group; Schochor, Federico & Staton, P.A.; Spangenberg, Shibley & Liber, LLP; Douglas R. Beam, P.A.; and The Law Office of Cynthia G. Angelos, P.A. On May 7, 2019, the Board directed staff to piggyback on the March 18, 2019 Agreement with the City of Fort Pierce and the firms listed above. Suit was filed on June 13, 2019. On June 1, 2021, the Board approved Resolution No. 21-085 approving the Florida Memorandum of Understanding (the "Florida Plan"). On July 6, 2021, The Board approved a Restructuring Plan pertaining to the Purdue Bankruptcy. On December 7, 2021, the Board approved proposed settlements with Amerisource Bergen, Cardinal Health, McKesson and Janssen/Johnson & Johnson. FINANCIAL IMPACT: Florida has reached a proposed state-wide settlement with Endo, a manufacturer of opioid drugs. This settlement provides for a total payment of $65 million from Endo, $55 million of which will be used for opioid abatement, with the remainder for legal fees. These funds will be allocated between the state and local governments as set forth in the previously executed MOU with the State of Florida. Estimates of the financial impact of this settlement related to St. Lucie County are as follows: County Principal Subdivisions City/County Fund Amount Regional Fund Amount St. Lucie $ 331,458.13 St. Lucie County $ 78,893.85 Fort Pierce $ 13,161.66 Port St. Lucie $ 32,241.28 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the proposed participation agreement and authorize the Chair and County Attorney to cosign the agreement. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Page 325 of 381 Coordination/Signatures Date: January 24, 2022 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: January 25, 2022 Jennifer Hill, Office of Management & Budget Director Date: January 26, 2022 Ron Parrish, Public Safety Director Date: January 26, 2022 Howard Tipton, County Administrator Page 326 of 381 Daniel Mclntyxre From: Eric Romano <eric@romanolawgroup.com> Sent: Friday, January 21, 2022 5:08 PM To: Daniel McIntyre Subject: Important Update re Opioid Litigation - St. Lucie County Attachments: Endo Settlement Letter.pdf; Executed Endo -Florida Agreement.pdf; Book2.xlsx; Participation Form.pdf SECURITY WARNING: This email originated from outside the County systems. Please show caution when clicking links or opening attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe. Daniel, We are pleased to report that Florida has reached a proposed state-wide settlement with Endo, a manufacturer of opioid drugs. This settlement provides for a total payment of $65 million from Endo, $55 million of which will be used for opioid abatement, with the remainder for legal fees. These funds will be allocated between the state and local governments as set forth in the previously executed MOU with the State of Florida. We are attaching the following documents for your review: A letter explaining the terms of the settlement and the ACTION STEPS needed to participate. 2. A copy of the Florida -Endo Settlement Agreement 3. A spreadsheet showing the allocation of settlement funds to each litigating subdivision 4. The Participation Form that must be executed and returned to us to participate in the settlement As you will note, we are requesting that you execute the attached Participation Form on or before February 9, 2022, and email a copy to eric�Romano LawGroup.com. If you do not execute this Participation Form, your entity will not be eligible to participate in this settlement. We recommend that your entity participate in this settlement with Endo, based on the scope of Endo's activities in Florida and the risks of continued litigation. In particular, there is a substantial risk that Endo could file for bankruptcy in the absence of settlement, which would prolong resolution and jeopardize the assets available for recovery. This settlement amount is in line with those which have been reached in other states, and the presence of a "most favored nation" clause ensures that if larger settlements are reached in smaller states by population, or if there is a global resolution which would result in a larger amount payable to Florida, this settlement amount will be supplemented. Thank you for your prompt attention to the above. If you have any questions or would like to discuss, please contact us at your convenience. Page 327 of 381 Eric Romano ROMANO Board Certified by the Florida Bar and the National Board of Trial Advocacy in Criminal Trial Law ® ROMANO LAW GROUP 801 Spencer Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33409 (561) 533-6700 romanolawgroup.com From: Eric Romano Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:37 AM To: 'Daniel McIntyre' <MCIND@stlucieco.org>; participation@nationalopioidsettlement.com Cc: Jamey Szerdi <jamey@romanolawgroup.com>; Marjorie Levine <Marjorie@romanolawgroup.com> Subject: RE: Participation Agreements Thanks Daniel. Received We don't need anything further at this time, but will continue to keep you posted. ins Eric Romano Board Certified by the Florida Bar and the National Board of Trial Advocacy in Criminal Trial Law ROMANO LAW GROUP 801 Spencer Drive West Palm Beach, FL 33409 (561) 533-6700 romanolawgroup.com From: Carol Bishop <bishopc stl> On Behalf Of Daniel McIntyre Sent: Wednesday, December 8, 2021 10:34 AM To: arp ticip_ation nationalopioidsettlement.com Cc: Eric Romano <eric@romanolawgroup.com>; Daniel McIntyre <MCIND stlucieco.o_r > Subject: Participation Agreements Importance: High As requested, please see fully executed Florida Subdivision County. Please confirm receipt of this email and advise if you need Thank you. Carol A. Bishop I Legal Assistant I County Attorney's Office Participation Forms attached for St. Lucie anything further. Page 328 of 381 Ph: 772-462-1419 1 Fax: 772-462-1440 12300 Virginia Ave. Fort Pierce 34982 face book. comistlucieAov I twitter.com/stlucie: ov i insta ram.comistlucieaov I yLutube.comistluciegov Tc LL.C-[r 2016-2019 9.�OORE S I WS '"fk5 STL L.UCIE COUNTY t Please Note: Florida has very broad public records laws. Most written communications to or from County officials regarding County business are pub•;ic record-, available to the public and media upon request. It is the policy of 5t. Lucie County that all County records shall be open for personal inspection, examinat;oo or copying. Your e-mail communications will be subject to public disclosure unless an exemption applies to the communication. If you received this emE ' i,- please notify the sender by reply e-mail and delete all materials from all computers. Page 329 of 381 ROMANO Navigate life. CONFIDENTIAL ATTORNEY -CLIENT PRIVILEGE PROTECTED COMMUNICATION January 21, 2022 ACTION STEP: Please have the individual authorized to bind your local community promptly execute the Attached Endo Participation Agreement and return it via email to ericCa?Roma noLawGroup.com no later than February 9, 2022. Re: Endo Settlement in Florida Dear Client: While we expect multiple and rolling settlements related to the National Opioid Litigation, many of us expected that Purdue would be the next to settle after the Distributor and J&J national deals. As many of you know, a Purdue resolution is now delayed, as a New York district court recently overturned the bankruptcy court's confirmation of Purdue's Chapter 11 Plan. Instead, based on pressure applied by the MDL and the upcoming trial date in Florida, Endo Health Solutions Inc. and Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. ("Endo) are now ready to settle. The proposed Endo settlement is a lump -sum payment of $65 million to Florida. We anticipate that the lump -sum remediation payments will be made at or about the same time as the first payments in the Distributors' and J&J monies flow into Florida, which should be in the 15t quarter of 2022. Endo has already settled with New York for $50 million, and we believe Endo is also attempting to settle in other states. The settlement agreement will include a most favored nations clause, which requires Endo to supplement this proposed settlement if it pays more to settle with any state other than California. Of the $65 million settlement, Endo will pay nearly $55 million to the state and litigating subdivisions, and $10 million to compensate the attorneys representing the state and local governments. This settlement process should be a bit more streamlined and efficient than the previous Distributor and J&J settlements. The Subdivision Settlement Participation Agreement ("PA") is nearly identical to the PA's utilized with the Distributors and J&J deals. The only differences are that there is no arbitration provision, and the time to file a dismissal is 7 days instead of 14. Likewise, the allocation of settlement funds within the State will be based on the previously Palm Beach International Towers John F. Romano. Board Certified by the Florida Bar and the National Board of Trial Advocacy in Civil Trial Law 1601 Belvedere Road, Suite 500-S Eric Romano, Board Certified by the Florida Bar and the National Board of Trial Advocacy in Criminal Trial Law West Palm Beach Florida, 33406-1551 Todd A. Romano, Attorney at Law 801 Spencer Drive Hall I° Marsocci, Attorney at Law West Palm Beach, FL33409 Corey B. Friedman, Attorney at Law (also admitted in California, New York and District of Columbia) Destiny R. Barbosa, Attorney at Law OFFICE: 561.533.6700 Jessica L. Latour, Attorney at Law TOLL FREE: 866.533.6700 Marjorie H. Levine, Attorney at Law FAX: 561.533.1285 Mikayla T. Taylor, Attorney at Law WEB: romanolawgroup.com Elliot B. Richman, Chief Operating Officer (admitted in New York 6 Connecticut only) Page 330 of 381 Endo Settlement in Florida January 21, 2022 adopted Statewide Allocation Agreement. Thus, 15% of the available remediation funds will be provided as direct payments to participating Litigating Subdivisions. Attached is a spreadsheet showing the amount you will receive under the 15% direct payment. The remaining funds will go to the Regional Fund and the State Fund. As opposed to the Distributors and J&J deal, if sufficient participation takes place within the next 30 days, you will receive your direct lump sum payment in or about April/May of this year. The 30-day deadline will expire on February 14, 2022. In order to effectuate the settlement, and allow us to timely submit this participation form, you must complete the attached Subdivision Settlement Participation Agreement and return it to eric�ii_Roman oLawGroup.com no later than February 9, 2022. It is important to note that any Litigating Subdivision that does not sign an Endo Subdivision Settlement Participation Agreement will be deemed a Non -Joining Subdivision. At Endo's request, any Non -Joining Subdivision's share of the Remediation Payment shall be returned to Endo. We ask that you have the individual authorized to bind your local community promptly execute the attached Subdivision Settlement Participation Agreement and return it to us at ericf-fr RomanoLawGroup.com on or before February 9, 2022. If you have any questions, please contact us. Best regards, L ERIC ROMANO Romano Law Group Page 331 of 381 Settlement Amount $ 55,000,000.00 City/County Fund Regional Fund Coun Principal Subdivisions Regional % by County for Abatement Fund Alachua 1.24106016444867% Alachua County Alachua Gainesville Baker 0.19317380413017% Baker County Bay 0.83965637331199% Bay County Callaway Lynn Haven Panama City Panama City Beach Bradford 0.18948420408137% Bradford County Breva rd 3.87879918044396% Brevard County Cape Canaveral Cocoa Cocoa Beach Melbourne Palm Bay Rockledge Satellite Beach Titusville West Melbourne Browa rd 9.05796267257777 Broward County Coconut Creek Cooper City Coral Springs Dania Beach Davie Deerfield Beach Fort Lauderdale Hallandale Beach Hollywood Lauderdale Lakes Lauderhill Lighthouse Point Margate Miramar North Lauderdale Oakland Park Page 332 of 381 Parkland Pembroke Pines Plantation Pompano Beach Sunrise Tamarac Weston West Park Wilton Manors Calhoun 0.04712774078090 Calhoun County Charlotte 0.73734623337592% Charlotte County Punta Gorda Citrus 0.96964577660634% Citrus County Clay 1.19342946145639% Clay County Collier 1.55133337642709% Collier County Marco Island Naples Columbia 0.44678115079207% Columbia County Lake City Desoto 0.11364040780249% DeSoto County Dixie 0.10374458089993 Dixie County Duval 5,43497515693510% Jacksonville Atlantic Beach Jacksonville Beach Escambia 1.34163444924367% Escambia County Pensacola Flagler 0.38986471224388% Flagler County Palm Coast Franklin 0.04991128255001% Franklin County Gadsden 0.12365607407671% Gadsden County Gilchrist 0.06433376935497% Gilchrist County Glades 0.04061283675771% Glades County Page 333 of 381 Gulf 0.05991423858784% Gulf County Hamilton 0.04794119590977% Hamilton County Hardee 0.06711004813185 Hardee County Hendry 0.14446091529681% Hendry County Hernando 1.51007594910967% Hernando County Highlands 0.35718851023682% Highlands County Avon Park Sebring Hillsborough 8.71098411365711% Hillsborough County Plant City Tampa Temple Terrace Holmes 0.08161242785125% Holmes County Indian River 0.75307605878085% Indian River County Sebastian Vero Beach Jackson 0.15893605879538% Jackson County Jefferson 0.04082164778410% Jefferson County Lafayette 0,03191177207568% Lafayette County Lake 1.13921122451870% Lake County Clermont Eustis Fruitland Park Groveland Lady Lake Leesburg Minneola Mount Dora Tavares Lee 3.32537188335925% Lee County Bonita Springs Cape Coral Estero Page 334 of 381 Fort Myers Leon 0.89719924493933% Leon County Tallahassee Levy 0.25119240174806% Levy County Liberty 0.01939945222513% Liberty County Madison 0.06354028745471% Madison County Manatee 2.72132334623483% Manatee County Bradenton Palmetto Marion 1.70117616896044% Marion County Ocala Martin 0.86948729811605% Martin County Stuart Miami -Dade 5.23211978417292 Miami -Dade County Aventura Coral Gables Cutler Bay Doral Florida City Hialeah Hialeah Gardens Homestead Key Biscayne Miami Miami Beach Miami Gardens Miami Lakes Miami Shores Miami Springs North Bay Village North Miami North Miami Beach Opa-locka Palmetto Bay Pinecrest South Miami Sunny Isles Beach Sweetwater Monroe 0.47638873858530% Page 335 of 381 Monroe County Key West Nassau 0.47693346300195% Nassau County Fernandina Beach Okaloosa 0.81921286595494% Okaloosa County Crestview Destin Fort Walton Beach Niceville Okeechobee 0.35349527869191% Okeechobee County Orange 4.67102821454589% Orange County Apopka Maitland Ocoee Orlando Winter Garden Winter Park Osceola 1.07345209294015% Osceola County Kissimmee St. Cloud Palm Beach 8.60159437205259% Palm Beach County Belle Glade Boca Raton Boynton Beach Delray Beach Greenacres Jupiter Lake Worth Lantana North Palm Beach Palm Beach Gardens Palm Springs Riviera Beach Royal Palm Beach Wellington West Palm Beach Pasco 4.69208726049375% Pasco County New Port Richey Zephyrhills Pinellas 7.93488981677650% Page 336 of 381 Pinellas County Clearwater Dunedin Gulfport Largo Oldsmar Pinellas Park Safety Harbor Seminole St. Petersburg Tarpon Springs Polk 2.15048302529773% Polk County Auburndale Bartow Haines City Lakeland Lake Wales Winter Haven Putnam 0.38489319406788% Putnam County Palatka Santa Rosa 0.70126731951283% Santa Rosa County Milton Sarasota 2.80504385757853% Sarasota County North Port Sarasota Venice Seminole 2.14114826454432% Seminole County Altamonte Springs Casselberry Lake Mary Longwood Oviedo Sanford Winter Springs St. Johns 0.71033334955402% St. Johns County St. Augustine St. Lucie 1.50662784355224% St. Lucie County Fort Pierce Port St. Lucie Sumter 0.32639887045945% Page 337 of 381 Sumter County Wildwood Suwannee 0.19101487969217% Suwannee County Taylor 0.09218189728241% Taylor County Union 0.06515630322411% Union County Volusia 3.13032967447995% Volusia County Daytona Beach DeBary Deland Deltona Edgewater Holly Hill New Smyrna Beach Orange City Ormond Beach Port Orange South Daytona Wakulla 0.11512932120801% Wakulla County Walton 0.26855821615101% Walton County Washington 0.12012444410873% Washington County Page 338 of 381 15.000000000000000% 40.000000000000000% $ 8,250,000.00 $ 22,000,000.00 CitylCounty Fund % {Principal Subdivisions Only City/County. Fund Amount Regional Fund Amount $ 273,033.24 0.846347404896564% $ 69,823.66 0.013113332456932% $ 1,081.85 0.381597611347118% $ 31,481.80 $ 42,498.24 0.193173804130173% $ 15,936.84 $ 184,724.40 0.539446037057239% $ 44,504.30 0.024953825526948% $ 2,058.69 0.039205632014689% $ 3,234.46 0.155153855595736% $ 12,800.19 0.080897023117378% $ 6,674.00 $ 41,686.52 0.189484204081366% $ 15,632.45 $ 853,335.82 2.387076812679440% $ 196,933.84 0.045560750208993 % $ 3,758.76 0.149245411423089% $ 12,312.75 0.084363286155357% $ 6,959.97 0.383104682233196% $ 31,606.14 0.404817397481049% $ 33,397.44 0.096603243797586% $ 7,969.77 0.035975416223927% $ 2,967.97 0.240056418923581% $ 19,804.65 0.051997577065795% $ 4,289.80 $ 1,992,751.79 4.062623697836280% $ 335,166.46 0.101131719448042% $ 8,343.37 0.073935445072532% $ 6,099.67 0.323406517663960% $ 26,681.04 0.017807041180440% $ 1,469.08 0.266922227152987% $ 22,021.08 0.202423224724969% $ 16,699.92 0.830581264530524% $ 68,522.95 0.154950491813518% $ 12,783.42 0.520164608455721% $ 42,913.58 0.062625150434726% $ 5,166.57 0.144382838130419% $ 11,911.58 0.029131861802689% $ 2,403.38 0.143683775129045% $ 11,853.91 0.279280208418825% $ 23,040.62 0.066069624496039% $ 5,450.74 0.100430840698613% $ 8,285.54 Page 339 of 381 0.045804060448432 % $ 3,778.83 0.462832363602822% $ 38,183.67 0,213918725664437% $ 17,648.29 0.335472163492860% $ 27,676.45 0.286071106146452% $ 23,600.87 0.134492458472026% $ 11,095.63 0.138637811282768% $ 11,437.62 0.029553115351569% $ 2,438.13 0.031630331127078% $ 2,609.50 $ 10,368.10 0.047127740780902% $ 3,888.04 $ 162,216.17 0.690225755587238% $ 56,943.62 0.047120477788680% $ 3,887.44 $ 213,322.07 0.969645776606338% $ 79,995.78 $ 262,554.48 1.193429461456390% $ 98,457.93 $ 341,293.34 1.354822227370880% $ 111,772.83 0.062094952002516% $ 5,122.83 0.134416197053695% $ 11,089.34 $ 98,291.85 0.342123248620213% $ 28,225.17 0.104659717919908% $ 8,634.43 $ 25,000.89 0.113640407802487% $ 9,375.33 $ 22,823.81 0.103744580899928% $ 8,558.93 $ 1,195,694.53 5.295636466902910% $ 436,890.01 0.038891507601085% $ 3,208.55 0.100447182431112% $ 8,286.89 $ 295,159.58 1.010997622822650% $ 83,407.30 0.330636826421023% $ 27,277.54 $ 85,770.24 0.305009358365478% $ 25,163.27 0.084857169626457% $ 7,000.72 $ 10,980.48 0.049911282550008% $ 4,117.68 $ 27,204.34 0.123656074076710% $ 10,201.63 $ 14,153.43 0.064333769354966% $ 5,307.54 $ 8,934.82 0.040612836757713%1 $ 3,350.56 Page 340 of 381 $ 13,181.13 0.059914238587842% $ 4,942.92 $ 10,547.06 0.047941195909773 % $ 3,955.15 $ 14,764.21 0.067110048131850% $ 5,536.58 $ 31,781.40 0.144460915296806% $ 11,918.03 $ 332,216.71 1.510075949109670% $ 124,581.27 $ 78,581.47 0.293187022776017% $ 24,187.93 0.025829016089707% $ 2,130.89 0.038172471371100% $ 3,149.23 $ 1,916,416.51 6.523111204400210% $ 538,156.67 0.104218491142418% $ 8,598.03 1.975671881252980% $ 162,992.93 0.107980721113446% $ 8,908.41 $ 17,954.73 0.081612427851251% $ 6,733.03 $ 165,676.73 0.654117789755259% $ 53,964.72 0.038315915467486% $ 3,161.06 0.060642353558104% $ 5,002.99 $ 34,965.93 0.158936058795375% $ 13,112.22 $ 8,980.76 0.040821647784097% $ 3,367.79 $ 7,020.59 0.031911772075683% $ 2,632.72 $ 250,626.47 0.781548804039386% $ 64,477.78 0.075909163208877% $ 6,262.51 0.041929254097962% $ 3,459.16 0.008381493024259% $ 691.47 0.026154034991644% $ 2,157.71 0.025048244425835% $ 2,066.48 0.091339390184647% $ 7,535.50 0.016058475802978% $ 1,324.82 0.041021380070204% $ 3,384.26 0.031820984672908% $ 2,625.23 $ 731,581.81 2.150386790650790% $ 177,406.91 0.017374893143227% $ 1,433.43 0.714429677167259% $ 58,940.45 0.012080171813344%1 $ 996.61 Page 341 of 381 0.431100350584635% $ 35,565.78 $ 197,383.83 0.471201146390692% $ 38,874.09 0.425998098548636% $ 35,144.84 $ 55,262.33 0.251192401748057% $ 20,723.37 $ 4,267.88 0.019399452225127% $ 1,600.45 $ 13,978.86 0.063540287454706% $ 5,242.07 $ 598,691.14 2.288523455470230% $ 188,803.19 0.379930754632155% $ 31,344.29 0.052869136132442% $ 4,361.70 $ 374,258.76 1.332181664866660% $ 109,904.99 0.368994504093786% $ 30,442.05 $ 191,287.21 0.788263440348682% $ 65,031.73 0.081223857767371% $ 6,700.97 $ 1,151,066.35 4.322006939062770% $ 356,565.57 0.024619727884733 % $ 2,031.13 0.071780152130635% $ 5,921.86 0.009414653667847% $ 776.71 0.013977628531358% $ 1,153.15 0.003929278792135% $ 324.17 0.098015895784777% $ 8,086.31 0.005452691410713% $ 449.85 0.024935668046393% $ 2,057.19 0.013683477346364% $ 1,128.89 0.292793005447970% $ 24,155.42 0.181409572478489% $ 14,966.29 0.040683650931878% $ 3,356.40 0.007836768607605% $ 646.53 0.006287935516250% $ 518.75 0.006169911892641% $ 509.02 0.005160355973775% $ 425.73 0.030379280716828% $ 2,506.29 0.030391990953217% $ 2,507.34 0.007847663095938% $ 647.43 0.007404620570392% $ 610.88 0.008296152865650% $ 684.43 0.007833137111493% $ 646.23 0.007693324511219% $ 634.70 0.004116300841853% $ 339.59 $ 104,805.52 Page 342 of 381 0.388301353168081% $ 32,034.86 0.088087385417219% $ 7,267.21 $ 104,925.36 0.393774017807404% $ 32,486.36 0.083159445194550% $ 6,860.65 $ 180,226.83 0.634511342251804% $ 52,347.19 0.070440130065665% $ 5,811.31 0.014678507280787% $ 1,210.98 0.077837487643835% $ 6,421.59 0.021745398712853% $ 1,794.00 $ 77,768.96 0.353495278691906% $ 29,163.36 $ 1,027,626.21 3.139068869871150% $ 258,973.18 0.097215150892295% $ 8,020.25 0.046728276208689% $ 3,855.08 0.066599822928250% $ 5,494.49 1.160248481489900% $ 95,720.50 0.056264584996256% $ 4,641.83 0.104903028159347% $ 8,654.50 $ 236,159.46 0.837248691390376% $ 69,073.02 0.162366006872243% $ 13,395.20 0.073837394677534% $ 6,091.59 $ 1,892,350.76 5.964262083621730% $ 492,051.62 0.020828445944817% $ 1,718.35 0.472069073961229% $ 38,945.70 0.306498271771001% $ 25,286.11 0.351846579457498% $ 29,027.34 0.076424835656644% $ 6,305.05 0.125466374888059% $ 10,350.98 0.117146617297688% $ 9,664.60 0.024507151505292% $ 2,021.84 0.044349646255964% $ 3,658.85 0.233675880256500% $ 19,278.26 0.038021764282493% $ 3,136.80 0.163617057282493% $ 13,498.41 0.049295743959188% $ 4,066.90 0.050183644758335% $ 4,140.15 0.549265602541466% $ 45,314.41 $ 1,032,259.20 4.429535538910390% $ 365,436.68 0.149879107494464% $ 12,365.03 0.112672614088898% $ 9,295.49 $ 1,745,675.76 Page 343 of 381 4.793536735851510% $ 395,466.78 0.633863120195985% $ 52,293.71 0.102440873796068% $ 8,451.37 0.047893986460330% $ 3,951.25 0.374192990776726% $ 30,870.92 0.039421706033295% $ 3,252.29 0.251666311990547% $ 20,762.47 0.038061710739714% $ 3,140.09 0.095248695748172% $ 7,858.02 1.456593090134460% $ 120,168.93 0.101970595049690% $ 8,412.57 $ 473,106.27 1.601687701502640% $ 132,139.24 0.028636162583534% $ 2,362.48 0.043971970660417% $ 3,627.69 0.047984773863106% $ 3,958.74 0.294875668467647% $ 24,327.24 0.036293172133642% $ 2,994.29 0.097033576086743% $ 8,005.27 $ 84,676.50 0.337937949352250% $ 27,879.88 0.046955244715628% $ 3,873.81 $ 154,278.81 0.654635277951081% $ 54,007.41 0.046632041561747% $ 3,847.14 $ 617,109.65 1.968804722107020% $ 162,426.39 0.209611771276754% $ 17,292.97 0.484279979634570% $ 39,953.10 0.142347384560186% $ 11,743.66 $ 471,052.62 1.508694164839420% $ 124,467.27 0.081305566429869% $ 6,707.71 0.080034542791008% $ 6,602.85 0.079767627826847% $ 6,580.83 0.061710013414747% $ 5,091.08 0.103130858057164% $ 8,508.30 0.164243490361646% $ 13,550.09 0.062262000823623% $ 5,136.62 $ 156,273.34 0.663822963111989% $ 54,765.39 0.046510386442027% $ 3,837.11 $ 331,458.13 0.956289133909966% $ 78,893.85 0.159535255653695% $ 13,161.66 0.390803453988581% $ 32,241.28 $ 71,807.75 Page 344 of 381 0.312364953738371% $ 25,770.11 0.014033916721079% $ 1,157.80 $ 42,023.27 0.191014879692165% $ 15,758.73 $ 20,280.02 0.092181897282406% $ 7,605.01 $ 14,334.39 0.065156303224115% $ 5,375.40 $ 688,672.53 1.784428217305820% $ 147,215.33 0.447556475211771% $ 36,923.41 0.035283616214775% $ 2,910.90 0.098983689498367% $ 8,166.15 0.199329190038370% $ 16,444.66 0.058042202342606% $ 4,788.48 0.031615805142634% $ 2,608.30 0.104065968305755% $ 8,585.44 0.033562287058147% $ 2,768.89 0.114644516477187% $ 9,458.17 0.177596501561906% $ 14,651.71 0.045221205322611% $ 3,730.75 $ 25,328.45 0.115129321208010% $ 9,498.17 $ 59,082.81 0.268558216151006% $ 22,156.05 $ 26,427.38 0.120124444108733% $ 9,910.27 Page 345 of 381 Exhibit D Subdivision Settlement Participation Form Governmental Entity: St. Lucie county State: Florida Authorized Official: Sean Mitchell Address 1: 2300 Virginia Avenue Address 2: City, State, Zip: Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Phone: 772-462-1400 Email: mitchellse@stlucieco.org The governmental entity identified above ("Governmental Entity"), in order to obtain and in consideration for the benefits provided to the Governmental Entity pursuant to the Settlement Agreement dated January 15, 2022 ("Endo Settlement"), and acting through the undersigned authorized official, hereby elects to participate in the Endo Settlement, release all Released Claims against all Releasees, and agrees as follows. 1. The Governmental Entity is aware of and has reviewed the Endo Settlement, understands that all terms in this Subdivision Settlement Participation Form have the meanings defined therein, and agrees that by signing this Subdivision Settlement Participation Form, the Governmental Entity elects to participate in the Endo Settlement and become a Participating Subdivision as provided therein. 2. The Governmental Entity shall immediately cease any and all litigation activities as to the Releasees and Released Claims and, within the later of 7 days following the entry of the Consent Judgment or 7 days of the Execution Date of this Subdivision Settlement Participation Form voluntarily dismiss with prejudice any Released Claims that it has filed. 3. The Governmental Entity agrees to the terms of the Endo Settlement pertaining to Subdivisions as defined therein. 4. By agreeing to the terms of the Endo Settlement and expressly agreeing to the releases provided for therein, the Governmental Entity is entitled to the benefits provided therein, including, if applicable, monetary payments beginning after the Effective Date of the Agreement. 5. The Governmental Entity agrees to use any monies it receives through the Endo Settlement solely for the purposes provided therein. 6. The Governmental Entity submits to the jurisdiction of the Court for purposes limited to the Court's role as provided in, and for resolving disputes to the extent provided in, the Endo Settlement. Page 346 of 381 7. The Governmental Entity has the right to enforce those rights given to them in the Endo Settlement. 8. The Governmental Entity, as a Participating Subdivision, hereby becomes a Releasor for all purposes in the Endo Settlement, including, but not limited to, all provisions of Section D and E, and along with all departments, agencies, divisions, boards, commissions, districts, instrumentalities of any kind and attorneys, and any person in their official capacity elected or appointed to serve any of the foregoing and any agency, person, or other entity claiming by or through any of the foregoing, and any other entity identified in the definition of Releasor, provides for a release to the fullest extent of its authority. As a Releasor, the Governmental Entity hereby absolutely, unconditionally, and irrevocably covenants not to bring, file, or claim, or to cause, assist or permit to be brought, filed, or claimed, or to otherwise seek to establish liability for any Released Claims against any Releasee in any forum whatsoever. The releases provided for in the Endo Settlement are intended by the Parties to be broad and shall be interpreted so as to give the Releasees the broadest possible bar against any liability relating in any way to Released Claims and extend to the full extent of the power of the Governmental Entity to release Claims. The Endo Settlement shall be a complete bar to any Released Claim. 9. The Governmental Entity hereby takes on all rights and obligations of a Participating Subdivision as set forth in the Endo Settlement. 10. In connection with the releases provided for in the Endo Settlement, each Governmental Entity expressly waives, releases, and forever discharges any and all provisions, rights, and benefits conferred by any law of any state or territory of the United States or other jurisdiction, or principle of common law, which is similar, comparable, or equivalent to § 1542 of the California Civil Code, which reads: General Release; extent. A general release does not extend to claims that the creditor or releasing party does not know or suspect to exist in his or her favor at the time of executing the release, and that if known by him or her would have materially affected his or her settlement with the debtor or released party. A Releasor may hereafter discover facts other than or different from those which it knows, believes, or assumes to be true with respect to the Released Claims, but each Governmental Entity hereby expressly waives and fully, finally, and forever settles, releases and discharges, upon the Effective Date of the Release, any and all Released Claims that may exist as of such date but which Releasors do not know or suspect to exist, whether through ignorance, oversight, error, negligence or through no fault whatsoever, and which, if known, would materially affect the Governmental Entities' decision to participate in the Endo Settlement. 11. Nothing herein is intended to modify in any way the terms of the Endo Settlement, to which the Governmental Entity hereby agrees. To the extent this Subdivision Settlement Page 347 of 381 Participation Form is interpreted differently from the Endo Settlement in any respect, the Endo Settlement controls. I have all necessary power and authorization to execute this Subdivision Settlement Participation Form on behalf of the Governmental Entity. Signature: Name: Title: Date: (the "Execution Date of this Subdivision Settlement Participation Form") Page 348 of 381 TO: PRESENTED BY SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: AGENDA REQUEST Board of County Commissioners Kori Benton, Assistant Planning Manager Planning & Development Services 10.B.1. 2021-54534 REGULAR AGENDA - PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DATE: 2/1/2022 *ACTION ITEM - PERMISSION TO ADVERTISE QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEM? No Request Permission to Advertise a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to Expand the Urban Services Boundary and Update Associated Goals, Policies and Objectives Essential to Plan for the Expansion St. Lucie County maintains an Urban Service Area Boundary (USB) to ensure new development is designed and planned in a manner which does not place an economic burden upon the services and facilities of St. Lucie County while limiting the negative impacts of a sprawling low density development pattern and the fiscal burden that pattern of development has on the ability of the community to meet its service needs (Comprehensive Plan Policies 1.1.5.2 & 1.1.5.3) The Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) has discussed, at Informal Agenda Meetings, the necessary updates to the USB to account for experienced, pending and anticipated growth in St. Lucie County. Planning staff is preparing a Comprehensive Plan Amendment (CPA) to expand the Urban Services Boundary and update associated Goals, Policies and Objectives to provide a planning strategy for said growth and associated public facility demands. The CPA will be presented to the Planning & Zoning Commission, acting as the Local Planning Agency (LPA), in February or March prior to a hearing before the BOCC. Staff has met, and will be coordinating, with the Treasure Coard Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) Excecutive Director to iniate a Planning Study related to the proposed expansion, while exploring any policy guidelines to preserve and protect the rural character of well established areas within the USB expansion area. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A 191►/_11!14T-11IIPi1lelok11l N/A RECOMMENDATION: Page 349 of 381 Staff recommends permission to advertise the proposed ordinance for the first of three public hearings, with the first hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission projected on February 17, 2022 or March 17, 2022 at 6:00 p.m., or soon thereafter as may be heard. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: MOVER: SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures Benjamin Balcer, Planning & Development Services Assistant Director •I' Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: January 25, 2022 Date: January 26, 2022 (� Date: January 26, 2022 Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator Page 350 of 381 ORDINANCE No. 2022-XXX FILE NO.: TC P-XXXXXX AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE AMENDMENT OF THE 2018 ADOPTED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND COMPRENSIVE PLAN MAP SERIES TO AMEND THE URBAN SERVICE BOUNDARY AND; UPDATE THE ASSOCIATED OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH T H E DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION; AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. On January 9, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, adopted the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 2. The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie as the governing body of St. Lucie County having jurisdiction over this application pursuant to Chapter 163, Florida Statues, is authorized and empowered to consider amendment to the adopted Comprehensive Plan of St. Lucie County. 3. On February 17, 2022 (projected), the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission acting as the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing, of which due notice was published in the St. Lucie News Tribune, and recommended approval/denial of the proposed amendment to the Board of County Commissioners. 4. On , the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida held the first of two required public hearing, of which due notice was placed in the St. Lucie News Tribune and approved/denied transmittal to the Department of Economic Opportunity. 5. On , the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida held a public hearing, of which due notice was placed on the St. Ordinance No. 2021-XXX Page 1 Page 351 of 381 Lucie News Tribune, and deemed the adoption of the amendments to the Comprehensive Plan NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: /_31IF_1 Biel i9lei zto] a9:I4F_1►yi14ki111LTi14zk&I The Board of County Commissioners does hereby adopt the amendments to the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, attached herein as Exhibit A. B. CHANGES TO THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The Board of County Commissioners does hereby state its intention to amend the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, primarily the Future Land Use Element to expand the Urban Services Boundary; further updating support objectives and policies. Cads] ki 101" 010"a:191T/ 69 Eel 069 Special acts of the Florida Legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County Ordinances and County Resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with the Ordinance are hereby superseded by this Ordinance to the extent of such conflict. D. SEVERABILITY If any portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this Ordinance. If this Ordinance or any provisions thereof shall be held to be inapplicable for any person, property, or circumstances, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property or circumstances. E. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE This Ordinance shall be applicable as stated in Paragraph A and B. Ordinance No. 2021-XXX Page 2 Page 352 of 381 F. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of the Ordinance to the Bureau of Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304. G. FILING WITH THE STATE LAND PLANNING AGENCY The Planning and Development Services Director shall send a certified copy of the Ordinance to the Department of Economic Opportunity, Community Planning and Development Programs, 107 East Madison Street, Caldwell Building, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-4120. H. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance shall take effect thirty-one (31) days after the adoption. If the Ordinance is challenged within thirty (30) days after adoption, the Ordinance shall not be effective until the State Land Planning Agency or Administration Commission respectively issues a final order finding the adopted amendment in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(10), Florida Statues. Ordinance No. 2021-XXX Page 3 Page 353 of 381 lW_1 Biel i I Eel► I After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Sean Mitchell, Chair XXX Frannie Hutchinson, Vice -Chair XXX Chris Dzadovsky, Commissioner XXX Linda Bartz, Commissioner XXX Cathy Townsend, Commissioner XXX PASSED AND DULY ENACTED this day of , 2022. Attest: Deputy Clerk Board of County Commissioners St. Lucie County, Florida By: Chair Approved As To Form and Correctness: By: County Attorney Ordinance No. 2021-XXX Page 4 Page 354 of 381 Exhibit i°A" Updated Comprehensive Plan Map Series Exhibits • Future Land Use (2040) Map • Existing Land Use Map • Urban Service Boundary Map • Coastal Planning Area Map • TVC Element Map Series Ordinance No. 2021-XXX Page 5 Page 355 of 381 GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES Ordinance No. 2021-XXX Page 6 Page 356 of 381 We Urban Service Boundary V Planned Expansion YIG'Ah 41YSa COLIii Y V^ 0 Current UBS !bd�4..h M. S. UBS Expansion Planned USB "- - —Prop. Arterial A r; — Prop. WS Line Y o-h, 4TLL4TIC L Current Urban Services - Boundary . Page 357 381 of -- - - -- -- - -- Indian River County - -- -- - -- - - - - - - - - -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- INDRIORo. A 31 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. FLORIDATRK ST•LUCIE'BLVD 1 - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ORANGE AVE -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16 Y1� Q - •�_______- OT��4NOBEEf� -- -- •_ •_ ST JAMES BLVD WMIDWAV RD __ __ __ __ __ __ -- -- -- -- -- -- xjj ST.LUCIE.WEST BLVD/., ,y�c PRIMA'VIBTA_BLV PORT�ST: LUCIE BLVD_ Martin County St. Lucie County Map: FLU-9 2018 Comprehensive Plan N Urban Service Boundary Map w E S Miles • Legend 0 2.25 4.5 ® Urban Service Boundary I- _ _ Municipalities ® County Boundary ,-waa „a m,nwMaww,cw 0 Print Date: 7/23/2018 Calvin, Giordano 9 Associates, Inc. Source: St. Lucie County Page 358 of 381 - -- -- Indian River County -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- ------------ 6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- _ —1 t B- ¢ 1 m FLORIDA TPK ! ST UCIE BLVD = 1 J`' apt' -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ORANGE AVE _ = 5E — - - - ' - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - r ! r� DKEEpNp6 - ' ■ _��_- - � -_ -_� - -- -- 0 JAMES BLVD'- W MIDWAY-- Q _ R -- 4J ST. LUCIE VlEST,BLVD/.' - (��O Martin County St. Lucie County Ma CST-1 2018 Comprehensive Plan p� IN Coastal Plannig Area Map w E Legend COUNTYMiles ® County Boundary Existing Land Use -Industrial -Residential Multi -Family 0 2.25 4.5 OCoastal Planning Area -Agriculture Light Industrial Residential Single Family ® Urban Service Boundary _ Commercial Institutional ® Residential Vacant Municipalities ® Commercial Vacant Miscellaneous ® Other y �Pwne iN�.ua saw s.ma.� Print Date: 7/24/2018 Water - Conservation/Recreation 0 Residential Mobile Homes Right of Way Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. Source: St. Lucie County Government Page 359 of 381 Indian River County-- - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ ,y FLOIIDATPK aT LUCIE BLVD OQ' n spy ORANGE AVE - - s_ .•. __� _. .. -_ _ r�•�_ t O - WMIDWAYRD•. III` _ Ell 4J ST LUCIE WEST BIL - VF•y - PRIMA VISTABLVD - _ -- -- -- -- -- -- - w. '-1 _ - _ •; •PORT ST.LUCIESL D•. •. ' - _ Martin County St. Lucie County Map: FLU-1 2018 Comprehensive Plan N Future Land Use 2040 Map W E Legend S � Urban Service Boundary County Boundary Future Land Use - RH, Residential High - MXD, Mixed Use Development AG-5, Agriculture-5 - R/C, Residential/Conservation - H, Historic Mil 0 2,25 4.5 ..a m.mw..awwcw r Municipalities AG-2.5, Agriculture-2.5 CPUB, Conservation -Public - SD, Special District - RE, Residential Estate - COM, Commercial - TVC, Towns, Villages & Countryside - RS, Residential Suburban J IND, Industrial Q ROW, Right of Way _ Print Date: 7/23/2018 RU, Residential Urban P/F, Public Facilities ;' SUBM, Submerged Lands Calvin, Giordano 9 Associates, Inc. �. - RM, Residential Medium - T/U, Transportation/Utilities SPIS, Spoil Islands • < E > , o N .. : o . , o s Source:St Lucie County Page 360 of 381 rti � rtip r �p� o� d„ 1 Lucie Village +Y•u +Y• a. +Y•ary +Y•u +Y• a. +Y•+�r o � .� a.�.doYJ`+�.daY�+�.do�4+�.doYJ`+�.dau 1.+� n -' •� Y`._ ti'1 ��: l�.v • + oll s iY.0 +Y. ice. w aiov - ddi rK d w .n � rtip II'� EPort n wd 'y _�wdaa r •®�cmoo ' COUNTY F L 0 R I D A Indian River County-- - - - - - - - - - - -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ ,y FLOIIDATPK aT LUCIE BLVD OQ' n spy ORANGE AVE - - s_ .•. __� _. .. -_ _ r�•�_ t O - WMIDWAYRD•. III` _ Ell 4J ST LUCIE WEST BIL - VF•y - PRIMA VISTABLVD - _ -- -- -- -- -- -- - w. '-1 _ - _ •; •PORT ST.LUCIESL D•. •. ' - _ Martin County St. Lucie County Map: FLU-1 2018 Comprehensive Plan N Future Land Use 2040 Map W E Legend S � Urban Service Boundary County Boundary Future Land Use - RH, Residential High - MXD, Mixed Use Development AG-5, Agriculture-5 - R/C, Residential/Conservation - H, Historic Mil 0 2,25 4.5 ..a m.mw..awwcw r Municipalities AG-2.5, Agriculture-2.5 CPUB, Conservation -Public - SD, Special District - RE, Residential Estate - COM, Commercial - TVC, Towns, Villages & Countryside - RS, Residential Suburban J IND, Industrial Q ROW, Right of Way _ Print Date: 7/23/2018 RU, Residential Urban P/F, Public Facilities ;' SUBM, Submerged Lands Calvin, Giordano 9 Associates, Inc. �. - RM, Residential Medium - T/U, Transportation/Utilities SPIS, Spoil Islands • < E > , o N .. : o . , o s Source:St Lucie County Page 362 of 381 rti � rtip r �p� o� d„ 1 Lucie Village +Y•u +Y• a. +Y•ary +Y•u +Y• a. +Y•+�r o � .� a.�.doYJ`+�.daY�+�.do�4+�.doYJ`+�.dau 1.+� n -' •� Y`._ ti'1 ��: l�.v • + oll s iY.0 +Y. ice. w aiov - ddi rK d w .n � rtip II'� EPort n wd 'y _�wdaa r •®�cmoo ' COUNTY F L 0 R I D A -- - - -- -- - -- Indian River County - -- -- - -- - - - - - - - - -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- INDRIORo. A 31 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. FLORIDATRK ST•LUCIE'BLVD 1 - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ORANGE AVE -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 16 Y1� Q - •�_______- OT��4NOBEEf� -- -- •_ •_ ST JAMES BLVD WMIDWAV RD __ __ __ __ __ __ -- -- -- -- -- -- xjj ST.LUCIE.WEST BLVD/., ,y�c PRIMA'VIBTA_BLV PORT�ST: LUCIE BLVD_ Martin County St. Lucie County Map: FLU-9 2018 Comprehensive Plan N Urban Service Boundary Map w E S Miles • Legend 0 2.25 4.5 ® Urban Service Boundary I- _ _ Municipalities ® County Boundary ,-waa „a m,nwMaww,cw 0 Print Date: 7/23/2018 Calvin, Giordano 9 Associates, Inc. Source: St. Lucie County Page 364 of 381 - -- -- Indian River County -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - - - - - - - - - -- -- -- -- - -- -- -- ------------ 6 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- _ —1 t B- ¢ 1 m FLORIDA TPK ! ST UCIE BLVD = 1 J`' apt' -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ORANGE AVE _ = 5E — - - - ' - -- -- -- -- -- -- -- - r ! r� DKEEpNp6 - ' ■ _��_- - � -_ -_� - -- -- 0 JAMES BLVD'- W MIDWAY-- Q _ R -- 4J ST. LUCIE VlEST,BLVD/.' - (��O Martin County St. Lucie County Ma CST-1 2018 Comprehensive Plan p� IN Coastal Plannig Area Map w E Legend COUNTYMiles ® County Boundary Existing Land Use -Industrial -Residential Multi -Family 0 2.25 4.5 OCoastal Planning Area -Agriculture Light Industrial Residential Single Family ® Urban Service Boundary _ Commercial Institutional ® Residential Vacant Municipalities ® Commercial Vacant Miscellaneous ® Other y �Pwne iN�.ua saw s.ma.� Print Date: 7/24/2018 Water - Conservation/Recreation 0 Residential Mobile Homes Right of Way Calvin, Giordano & Associates, Inc. Source: St. Lucie County Government Page 365 of 381 Sle Cov we � Legend m 1 dulacre m ¢ .2 dulacre c d0 c 5 dulacre m w■ 9 dulacre ■ 5 dulacre- Mixed Use Development ■ 9 dulacre - Mixed Use Development Js ■ 0 dulacre - Commerciai Uses ■ 0 dulacre - Industrial Uses � 2 v ■ 0 dulacre - UtilitylTransportation N .11 p d o 0 dulacre - Public Facilities �.. �..� •. �.. EY F Jack Island t N c Sunshine State P rKwa ...........t a St L Ivd- NC Boundary Municipal Limits m •• Urban Service Boundary 4 C-25 Canal (Belcher Canal) Y _ Road and canal rights -of -way The Transferable Development Value Map reflects the underlying densities and intensities established by the [C 11-3 Flphave pre-existing Future Land Use Map. Properties shall not the underlying potential densities or intensities TRANSFERABLE DEVELOPMENT VALUE MAP limited by the TVC Element. St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan 11- 4 Adopted 4.2.2019 TVC Element GOPs Page 366 of 381 j A L............................ 46 0) <D n Q mo m m M Oo y � EXHIBIT A Existing Future Land Use of Proposed TVC Area Page 367 of 381 I ndian RivAr rani in 1 1 I ............ 46 V EXHIBIT B Proposed Future Land Use for TVC Area Page 368 of 381 Board of County Commissioners December 14, 2021 - Informal Urban Service Boundary (USB) Planning & Development Services Department Benjamin Baker, AICP Kori Benton, AICP Page 369 of 381 4l, ULCUE e • Utilities Urban Services Capital Improvement Evaluation • Water, Wastewater & Electricity • Roads • Schools • Parks • Libraries • Fire/ EMS • Hospitals/Major Medical • Law Enforcement • State College &Career Training ❖ Stormwater ❖ Lighti ng ❖Transit ❖Sidewalks ❖Solid Waste Collection & Management ****Correctional Facilities ❖Emergency Management & Evacuation Page 370 of 381 ts5lro � South St. Lucie County Planned Roads — Completed C) Roads Port St. Lucie's Western Movement City 11'l l t5 O kARiidga PSL's 24,000-acre Western Annexation Area: Tradition DRI, Western Grove DRI, and Southern Grove DRI. \ Creek h✓xs[wm Pkrly w3c City of Fort Pierce City of Part St. Lucie PSL Water Farm County Boundary L St. Lucie County &Municipal Boundaries Urban Service Boundary & Impact Fee Credit Funded Roads I l ; Li Ra �' f i t E„= wse N'S C Ew 3 Ew4 i Pam wSas ra sc eedoer ,r. St. Lucie �Mjy� .Current U ban �� Services Bound j r" t LI 'S 1 i ;' I--- �x y _ t h t + I � � I i Pk age 1 I M I ` 1 � I Martin County Page 371 of 381 ST. LIll CIE 0@1 N�17Y F L ® R Public Facilities ao°oa 00 oa School Fire Station M Library Park Fairgrounds Golf Course TPO Roadway Needs Plan WI South St. Lucie County Planned Roads Completed C) Roads r` dge Rancch Rangeli- r— V i Paull of Fort Pierce `I AS .56� City of Port St. Lucie County Boundary St. Lucie County & Municipal Boundaries Urban Service Boundary & Impact Fee Credit Funded Roads M Martin County. . Lucie County's rban Services Boundary Page 372 of 381 T. MEN 0@1 M-Tff ® R lid Smart Moves 2045 Roadway Needs Plan Proj Long Range Urban Service ;. Boundary Expansion Arterial A Future Alignment _ I South County Urban Service Boundary Expansion fta6rray f DWS Min I\ :n Urban Service Boundary -„ Continuity Expansion 109E � uy.l Y3MY IF�rr.1�i.1 ' NH�+CxiFJ}�Ydrh"RUrd ClrcSri ry EAMV {yCf lyl Gpp ATLAA RC OCEAN MIDWAI C 711i1i11�' ff 11 5 I ¢ Current Urban Services 01�< .-��"y° Boundary ...F� J }� } ■1 Z I HJI...WIL "ARFIN GIYUN IY + IENSEN BELCH BLVD x ISWFAAR R Figure3-4 Roadway Needs Plan Page 373 of 381 Board of County Commissioners December 14, 2021 - Informal Urban Service Boundary (USB) Planning & Development Services Department Benjamin Baker, AICP Kori Benton, AICP Page 374 of 381 ST. L[1CIE ou nl-T�y F L ® Rlimb Smart Moves 2045 Population Growth Areas WDIAN RIDER COLINTV %URu Fu s Projected St. Lucie County 0 Water Supply Line w W m O w W s 9 I_. LT ROhp. r' i f � + FgIkk4E . n 51?L4: � WtSl k9fIL_L?A Diu { f - 51Y AT mAR?jry COLwr r ` Figure 18. Population Growth Irom 2015 l0 2045 Population Growth f hriM 2015 to 2045 <� kma than lw LOW - LE04 Cmalnr Mon LECO ATL NTJC OCEgN 'L%E"B:S{a;r Page 375 of 381 girl, ILUCELE - , T 0 Sustainable Growth Objective 1.1.5: Urban Sprawl. Consider changes to the future land use plan based upon smart growth, energy -efficient land use patterns and discouraging the proliferation of urban sprawl. Policy 1.1.5.1- Consistent with other policies, encourage the location of urban land use intensities, within the defined urban service boundary..... Policy 1.1.5.2 - Require that new development be designed and planned in a manner which does not place an economic burden upon the services and facilities of St. Lucie County. Policy 1.1.5.3 - Retain an urban service area boundary to restrict the negative impacts of a sprawlin,a low density development pattern and the fiscal burden that pattern of development has on the ability of the community to meet its service needs. Policy 1.1.5.6 - Future land use map amendment applications that increase the number of potential dwelling units within the unincorporated county, should create a balance of land uses based upon demands of the residential population for the nonresidential needs of an area and allow the operation of real estate markets to provide adequate choices for permanent and seasonal residents and business. Page 376 of 381 `�=ILUC« Western Growth -Evaluation Policy 1.1.3.5 - The County shall maintain a site assessment process to evaluate the potential conversion of existing or designated agricultural land uses to non-agricultural land uses in a rational and orderly manner. The site assessment process for a conversion shall require as a condition to such conversion that the Board of County Commissioners affirmatively find that the proposed non-agricultural use: a. is compatible with adjacent land uses, b. maintains the viability of continued agricultural uses on adjacent lands; c. contains soils suitable for urban use as defined by the St. Lucie County soil survey; d. is suitable with existing site -specific land characteristics; e. is consistent with comprehensive development plans; f. will have available the necessary infrastructure concurrent with the anticipated demands for development; g. will avoid the extension of the urban services boundary to create any enclaves, pockets, or finger areas; and, h. Could not be feasibly located on non-agricultural land. Page 377 of 381 Okeechobee Road to Orange Avenue Page 378 of 381 s0J��« Towns, Villages &Countryside Transferable Density Map c 4 Sur Wne Slato P C-25 Canal (Belcher Canal) � Legend 1 d u?acre 2 dWacre :5 ikdar�e `P dwacn-- - m 5 dulacm Mwad Lisp Dcve1opi cmI dui= Mixed Use Devegopmept m0 dwtam - Commeiria I Uses 0 0 -duvam - Inductial Uses 11: m 0 dtdauie - U1i14Nrark"Ptotion u� r, (I dJacm - Pubtic FacAies !E 711 # TVC 9auwdarY Municipal Limits Urban Service Boundary Road and canali fights -of -way Page 379 of 381 ST. L[1CIE 0@1 M-Tff F L ® R Smart Moves 2045 Population Growth Areas Population Growth lhY M 2015 to 2045 4 *tea Ikon 1W SW •1AEd -7idr LOW- LE00 CmaLnr Mon LECO 6T5 —�4BAgGEA4F-� a a s € e o i f Iu W m O W 5If LLB:! Wt!,I M; L_L, A b4 X ?IlYl.Y }J 5W rRf j� mAH?jh' COLwrY ` Figure 18. Population Growth Irom 2015 to 2045 ATL NTJCOCt=gN 'L%E"B:S{a;-r ' Page 380 of 381 girl, LUCEIE A South St. Lucie County 13 Page 381 of 381