HomeMy WebLinkAboutTEST REPORTa
Architectural Testing
Scq
Vl• N
st l�04eYNFO
C�4ny
ASTM E 1886 and ASTM E 1996 TEST REPORT
ReportNo.: E5450.01-801-44
Rendered to:
Diamond Door Products
n Hempstead, Texas
�c
:��.
PRODiICT TYPE:-, Steel Ouis ng Door
SERIES/MODEC'4070,Deadbolt 150mpWWind Rated Door'
p��EitWESi��O�
No. 7201
r4/`
�•, STATE OF .'_ � � F
ptORID
I �
ogvysp.ahm.wrsy
2015.06.23 14:15:34-07'00'
Test Date(s): 03/25/15
Through: 03/27/15
ReportDate: 04/10/15
Test Record Retention End Date: 03/27/19
2865 Market Loop %Ar,tlywarchtest.com Niw`,ni.intertek.com 9
/buildin p 817.410.7202
So! rthiake, TX 76092 . f. 717.764.4129
Architectural Testing
1.0 Report Issued To:
2.0 Test Laboratory:
3.0 Project Summary:
Diamond Door Products
52294 Hwy 290 West
Hempstead, Texas 77445
Architectural Testing, Inc.
2865 Market Loop
Southlake, Texas 76092
(817) 410- 7202
Test Report No.: E5450.01-801-44
Report Date: 04/10/15
Revision 1: 06/19/15
Page 2 of 12
3.1 Product Type: Steel Outswing Door
3.2 Series/Model: 4070 Deadbolt 150mph Wind Rated Door
3.3 Compliance Statement: Results obtained are tested values and were secured by
using the designated test method(s). The specimen(s) tested met the performance
requirements set forth in the referenced test procedures for a +2428 Pa (+50.70
pso and -3064 Pa (-64.00 pso Design Pressure with missile impacts corresponding
to Missile Level D and Wind Zone 3.
3.4 Test Date(s): 03/25/15- 03/27/15
3.5 Test Record Retention End Date:,i All'test records for this report will be retained
until March-27, 20.19 -. ::9ui:a'`'.
"�. 3.6 Test Location: Architectural -T, '%'nlFfric. tesi facilityin Southlake, Texas. S
3.7 Test Specimen Source: The test specimen(s) were provided by the client.
Representative samples of the test specimen(s) will be retained by Architectural
Testing for a minimum of four years from the test completion date.
3.8 Drawing Reference: The test specimen drawings have been reviewed by
Architectural Testing and are representative of the test specimen(s) reported
herein. Test specimen constructi6n was verified by Architectural Testing per the
drawings located in Appendix C. Any deviations are documented herein or on the
drawings.
3.9 List of Official Observers:
Name
Robert Muller
Clint Barnett
Company
Diamond Door Products
Architectural Testing, Inc.
^A
i
Architectural Testing
4.0 Test Specification(s):
Test Report No.: E5450.01-801-44
Report Date: 04/10/15
Revision 1: 06/19/15
Page 3 of 12
ASTM E 1886-05, Standard Test Method for Performance of Exterior Windows, Curtain
Walls, Doors, and Impact Protective Systems Impacted by Missile(s) and Exposed to Cyclic
Pressure Differentials
ASTM E 1996-12, Standard Specification for Performance of Exterior Windows, Curtain
Walls, Doors, and Impact Protective Systems Impacted by Windborne Debris in
Hurricanes
5.0 Test Specimen Description:
5.1 Product Sizes:
Test Specimens #1- #3:
Overall Area:
4.3 mZ
46.41 ftz
Width
Height
millimeters
inches
millimeters
inches
Overall size
1524
60
2829
111-3/8
Door Leaf
1219
48
2134
84
. AEt•
5-2-,Frame Construction.' The frpme head and 1'1ariibs:;were steel ,and measured 10-
2Y.44" wide by 3" deep Each door ,utilized .' stee�1 purlin anclioi�ed between the
buck and the door fiafiie a't(iePc�nt'ei�91, Z purlin was anchored to the buck
utilizing a 2" x 1-1/2" steel angle. The steel angle was anchored to the buck with
three 3/8" x 3" bolts while the other side of the angle was anchored to the Z purlin
with three 3/8" x 3/4" bolts. The bottom jambs were anchored to the bottom buck
with two 3/8" x 3" bolts. The top Z purlin was anchored into the jambs in the same
manner that the intermediate Z purlins were. The jambs had a 10" x 20" long c-
Y' Y C
channel with one located at the top jambs and tie other located 16" off the bottom.
The C channel was anchored into the jambs withO x 1"'self-taping screws every
12". The channel also utilized a bracket that was anchored to the Z purlin with two
3/8" x 3/4" bolts and the bracket anchored to the c channel with # 8 x 1" self -
tapping screws on all four corners. The threshold was anchored to the wood buck
with 1" tap cons spaced every 6". A steel skin was placed along the exterior
portions of the jambs and the head. The skin was anchored to the head and jambs
using#8 x 1" self -tapping screws.
5.3 Panel Construction: The door leaf was constructed with a top and bottom skin having
folded lock edges. The doors contained a bonded polystyrene core. Flush top and
bottom channels were welded to both face sheets. Two lock boxes were projection
welded to the lock stile of the door leaf.
^♦
Architectural Testing
5.0 Test Specimen Description: (Continued)
5.4 Material Thickness
Test ReportNo.; E5450.01-801-44
Report Date: 04/10/15
Revision 1: 06/19/1S
Page 4 of 12
Description
Thickness
Head and Jambs
0.062"
Exterior steel skin
0.035"
Door Panel Skin
0.030"
C- Channel
0.062"
Z-Purlins
0.109"
5.5 Weatherstripping:
Description
Quantity
Location
1/4" high two finger rubber
1 Row
Aluminum kerf attached to frame
jambs and head
1" high one finger rubber
1 Row
Aluminum kerf attached to leaf bottom
exterior skin
A!"
5.6 Drainage Sloped Sill
`v,j .
5 7 Hardware: �f
.'�`'
t „1jZ4L,
qgl Y 'J
Descri lion
Quantity
q'iocation
Door handle assembly with
lock
1
Door leaf mid -point -
Dead bolt lock
1
Door leaf above door handle
Strike plate
1
Door jamb
$Hinge
3
5.8 Reinforcement: No reinforcement was utilized.
6.0 Installation:
The specimen was installed into a 2 x 12 Spruce -Pine -Fir wood buck. The exterior
perimeter of the door was sealed with sealant.
ArCM1iteCh/al Tenting
7.0 Test Results: The results are tabulated as follows:
ASTM E 1886, Large Missile Impact
Test Report No.: E5450.01-801-44
Report Date: 04/10/15
Revision 1: 06/19/15
Page 5 of 12
Conditioning Temperature: 21°C (70°F)
Missile Weight: 4218 g (9.30 lbs)
Missile Length: 2.44 m (8'0")
Muzzle Distance from Test Specimen: 5.18 m (17'0")
Test Unit #1: Orientation within ±5° of horizontal
Im act#1: Missile Velocity: 15.30m s 50.20 s
Impact Area
Center of door leaf
Observations
Missile hit target area, no ruptures or penetrations
Results
Pass
Im act #2: Missile Velocity: 15.24 m/s 50.00 s)
Impact Area
Top right corner of door panel
Observations
Missile hit target area, no ruptures or penetrations
Results
Pass
dt ifl i .. E�::. o-
f,`r i t�=,,� 1 Test'Unrt#2•: Orihntattonwithin±5 ofhorizontdl-
Impact #1: Missile Velocity: 15.33 m/s (50.30 fps)
Impact Area
Center of door leaf
Observations:
Missile hit target area, no'ruptures or penetrations
Results
Pass
Impact #2: Missile Velocity: 15.51 m/s (50.90 fps)
Impact Area
Bottom left corner of door panel
Observations
Missile hit target area, no ruptures or penetrations
Results
Pass
Note: See Architectural Testing Sketch #2 for impact locations.
d1 1•
1. 7rIA
^1►
L
Architectural Testing
7.0 Test Results: (Continued)
ASTM E 1886, Large Missile Impact
Test Report No.: E5450.01-801-44
Report Date: 04/10/15
Revision 1: 06/19/15
Page 6 of 12
Conditioning Temperature: 21°C (70°F)
Missile Weight: 4218 g (9.30 lbs)
Missile Length: 2.44 m (8'0")
Muzzle Distance from Test Specimen: 5.18 m (17'0")
Test Unit #3: Orientation within ±5° of horizontal
Impact #1: Missile Velocity: 15.30 m/s 50.20 fps)
Impact Area
Center Door Panel
Observations
Missile hit target area, no ruptures or penetrations
Results:
Pass
bn act #2: Missile Velocity: 15.30 m/s 50.20 s)
Impact Area
Bottom left corner of door panel
Observations
Missile hit target area, no ruptures or penetrations
Results
Pass
41
"-, Note SeeArchit2'ot?�it1l7eStingSlletcl #3foriinphctlocatrons "'r` ry
0
4<=
Architectural Testing
7.0 Test Results: (Continued)
ASTM E 1886, Air Pressure Cycling
Test Report No.: E5450.01-801-44
ReportDate: 04/10/15
Revision 1: 06/19/15
Page 7 of 12
Test Unit #1
Design Pressure: +2428 Pa (+50.70 psf) -3064 Pa (-64.00 pso
POSITIVE PRESSURE
Pressure Range
Number
Average
Pa (psf)
of Cycles
Cycle Time
Observations
(seconds)
486 to 1214
(10.14 to 25.35)
3500
2.21
No damage beyond the allowable
0 to 1457
0 to 30.42
300
2.50
No damage beyond the allowable
1214 to 1942
25.35 to 40.56
600
2.89
No damage beyond the allowable
728 to 2428
(15.21 to 50.70)
100
3.00
No damage beyond the allowable
001 o[rI:V Y 1U *0 R *QIHM
P, essure Range
Number
-Average
-�
n r =
Pa (pst] 'i!r to
� C ' 11es
Cycle Time
�.
. Observations
�.. ; �(i
(seconds)
„t
919 to 3064
19.20 to 64.00
.2.0
50
3.00
No damage beyond the allowable
1532 to 2451)
32 to 51.20.20
1050
2.89
No damage beyond the allowable
0 to 1839
0 to 38.40)-
50
3.00
No damage beyond the allowable
_r
613 to 1532'
(12.80 to 32)
3350
2.54
No damage beyond the allowable
Result: Pass
e Sue rc77
^♦
L
ArcOltectural TeSting
7.0 Test Results: (Continued)
ASTM E 1886, Air Pressure Cycling
Test ReportNo.: E5450.01-801-44
Report Date: 04/10/15
Revision 1: 06/19/15
Page 8 of 12
Test Unit #2
Design Pressure: +2428 Pa (+50.70 psfl -3064 Pa (-64.00 psfl
POSITIVE PRFSSiiRF
Pressure Range
Number
Average
Pa (psf)
of Cycles
Cycle Time
Observations
seconds
486 to 1214
10.14 to 25.35
3500
2.14
No damage beyond the allowable
0 to 1457
0 to 30.42
300
2.58
No damage beyond the allowable
1214 to 1942
25.35 to 40.16
600
2.78
No damage beyond the allowable
to 2428
EIS728
t
.21 to 50.7
0.70)
100
3.00
No damage beyond the allowable
NEGATiVF. PRFSMIRF.
PressureRait��,.
avTumbor
,.,.A�,e�gg4.
cl
h
ins
Pa (psf)
= of;Cyclescl
lC me,
' .eS <� • d
�, "'e ?O,bservations
c�
se_conds]
919 to 3
19.2.20 to 64.00 4.0
50
100
No damage beyond the allowable
1532 to 2451
32 to 51.20
1050
2.89
No damage beyond the allowable
0 to 1839
-
0 to 38.40
50
2.54-. _1'
No.damage beyond the allowable
613 to 1532
12.
(12.80 to 32)
3350
1.89
No damage beyond the allowable
Result: Pass
r Wke �+
i
AfcM1i[ec[Yfal Testing
7.0 Test Results: (Continued)
ASTM E 1886, Air Pressure Cycling
Test ReportNo.: E5450.01-801-44
Report Date: 04/10/15
Revision 1: 06/19/15
Page 9 of 12
Test Unit #3
Design Pressure: +2428 Pa (+50.70 psl) -3064 Pa (-64.00 pst)
POSITIVE PRESSURE
Pressure Range
Number
Average
Pa (psf)
of Cycles
Cycle Time
Observations
(seconds)
486 to 1214
3500
2.21
No damage beyond the allowable
10.14 to 25.35)
0 to 1457
300
2.50
No damage beyond the allowable
0 to 30.42
1214 to 1942
600
2.89
No damage beyond the allowable
25.35 to 40.56
728 to 2428
100
3.00
No damage beyond the allowable
(15.21 to 50.70)
NEGATIVE PRESSURE
Pressured Range
Nuigber ,
Average..
-
Cy,
4
, t
v Ob�ervatnoI►s,
Y
r Pa(psf)'
of Cycles F
e`�h'e4re�ie
'` fise�oniis) ka.
$ ,e f
`? ri c Fzs
4nn
F
919to3O64
50
3.00�
No damage beyond the allowable
19.20 to 64.00
.2 t.0
1532 to 2451
1050
2.89
No damage beyond the allowable
32 to 51.20
0 to 183950
3.00
No damage beyond the allowable
CO to 38.40
613 to 1532
3350
2.54
No damage beyond the allowable
(12.80 to 32)
Result: Pass
i
Architectural Testing
Test Report No.: E5450.01-801-44
Report Date: 04/10/15
Revision 1: 06/19/1S
Page 10 of 12
General Note: Upon completion of testing, the specimens met the requirements of Section 7
ofASTM E 1996.
B.OTest Equipment:
Cannon: Constructed from steel piping utilizing compressed air to propel the missile
Missile: 2x4 Southern Pine
Timing Device: Electronic Beam Type
Cycling Mechanism: Computer controlled centrifugal blower with electronic pressure
measuring device
Tape and film .were used to seal against air leakage during structural testing. In our
opinion, the tape and film did not influence the results of the test
an
iX jti yfi��y P to _.� �cr c.
®
Test Report No.: E5450.01-801-44
n, ecrTesting Report Date: 04/1/15
0�ra Te
Revision 1: 06/19/15
Page 11 of 12
Architectural Testing will service this report for the entire test record retention period.
Test records such as detailed drawings, datasheets, representative samples of test
specimens, or other pertinent project documentation, will be retained by Architectural
Testing, Inc. for the entire test record retention period.
This report does not constitute certification of this product nor an opinion or endorsement
by this laboratory. It is the exclusive property of the client so named herein and relates
only to the specimen(s) tested. This report may not be reproduced, except in full, without
the written approval of Architectural Testing, Inc.
For ARCHITECTURAL TESTING, Inc.
Clint Barnett
Technician
CAB:hd
,!;4 215=0
D9d*SknWby.rykrW fieg
Tyler Westerling, P.E.
Senior Project Engineer
Attachments,(pages): This report is complete only when all attachments listed are included. J3.
Appendix A Sketches (3)
,,- �J L.
APpend&-B Drawing (L1 , t ' " 'f° 1= +r,. t^. t
s 2 4 iy .t l•
t ✓ t ,4: i, �_� F`• • , i� to "_1. .,. �'"� �i='-
A
--'U-
Architectural Testing
Test Report No.: E5450.01-801-44
Report Date: 04/10/15
Revision 1: 06/19/15
Page 12 of 12
Rev. # Date Page(s) Revision(s)
1 06/19/15 Cover, I I Added FL PE seal, added Tyler
Westerling's signature
n
71,
^4&
Architectural Testing
"cs
Test ReportNo.: E5450.01-801-44
ReportDate: 04/10/15
Appendix A
Sketch(es)
Test Specimen # 1 Impact locations
A
-'1L
Architecture[ Testing
Test Report No.: E5450.01-801-44
Report Date: 04/10/15
Test Specimen # 2 Impact locations
® ^� Test ReportNo.: t Date: 0 4/10/44
Report Date: 04/10/15
4r[M1ttecmral Testing
Test Specimen # 3 Impact locations
® i Test Report No.: E5450.01-801-44
nrcmoeau�ai T.:ems Report Date: 04/10/15
Appendix B
Drawing
t
G
i
Installation Instructions
1) Field located door, remove and cut necessary girts
in bay.
2) Arrange jambs according to required swing, then
fasten header to jamb.
3) After assembling frame, place in position, square
and plumb. Hang door panel.
4) Fasten door frame to girts with screws or tack
welding.
5) Fasten bottom of doorjambs with 3/8 X 2'/. wedge
anchors.
6) Install threshold and door hardware.
7) The door jambs shall be fastened to the C-channel
framing. along the frame interior with eight (8) 1/4
x 11/8, self -tapping, hex -head sheetmetal screws
located 1" from the sill, and spaced at 12" on center
thereafter. The doorjambs shall be fastened to the
C-channel framing along the frame exterior with eight
(8) 412 x 11/8, self -tapping, hex -head sheet metal
screws and mtegra'�"ne`o,eerene washers located 1"
f m tfLe sill, and sspaced'at 12" on center thereafter.
ddBr-*,r&4eadshall be fastened to the "C" or'
'r 0� c nt12lli arcing along the frame interior with five
%eIf-tapping, hex -head sheet metal
screws Ided 1" from'the jamb, and 12" on center
thereaftef. The door frame head shall be fastened to
the C=channel framing along the frame exterior with
five (5( #12 x 11/8 ", self -tapping, hex -head sheet
metal screwsrand integral neoprene washers located
1" from the jamb, and spaced at 10" on center
thereafter.
9) Install Jamb Extension C-channel with "L" clips.
10) Anchor "L" clips to fQIr with 3/8 X 2'N wedge
anchors.
11) Fasten upper "L" clip to girt using 910 Tek screws.
12) Flash accordingly.
.11. x1_n ." .a q.11.
yet
DIAMOND DOOR PRODUCTS
4'0 X 8'0 Windstorm Installation
Architectural Testing
Diamond Door
Robert Muller
52294 HYY 290 West
Hempstead, Texas 77445
November 8, 2016
Dear Robert,
In test report E5450.01-801-44you tested three identical door specimens with a door leaf size of48 inches
wide by 84 inches tall in compliance with ASTM E1996(12). ASTM E1996(12) allows for alternate
construction feature products to be qualified based on the initial test. Some alternate constructions do
not require additional testing for qualification. If you produce a door leaf that is identical to the initial
three specimens except that the size is smaller in width and/or height then it is automatically qualified
without additional testing. I have copied the section below that deals with this situation.
ASTM E1996(12) Section A1.3.3 - Any substitution of an assembly of the same type as the three initial
specimens that contains a smallersash, panels, or lites at equal or lower design pressures shall be allowed
autorparically provided the some methods of fabrication are used and the anchorage is
45; ,, unabanged.; Smaller assemblies shall not exceed dimensions ofthe tested width or height
..;S
Jgpcerely, Y s —
y
17t; 111� 'l r
Andy;`Cost
Laboratory, Manager
1909 10th Street, Suite 100 w,,,,w archtest.com . wwni.intertek.com/building
Plano, TX 75074
p. 469.814.0687
f. 717.764.4129