Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 02.20.2024MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT AGENDA ST. LUCIE COUNTY Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 20, 2024 1:00 PM St. Lucie County Commission Chambers 2300 Virginia Avenue 3rd Floor of Roger Poitras Building Fort Pierce, FL 34982 BOARD MEMBERS District No. 2, Chair LARRY LEET District No. 3, Vice-Chair LINDA BARTZ District No. 1 CHRIS DZADOVSKY District No. 4 JAMIE FOWLER District No. 5 CATHY TOWNSEND Mission Statement St. Lucie Works to deliver superior service that enhances our quality of life *Final on 2/13 Page 1 of 78 Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 20, 2024 1:00 PM 2 | P a g e WELCOME All meetings are televised. All meetings provided with wireless internet access for public convenience. Please turn off all cell phones and pagers prior to entering the commission chambers. Please mute the volume on all laptops and PDAs while in use in the commission chambers. GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES – Attached is the agenda, which will determine the order of business conducted at today’s Board meeting. INVOCATION-PLEDGE – To bring order and decorum to its meeting, the Board begins its meetings with an invocation followed by the Pledge of Allegiance. Participation is voluntary. CONSENT AGENDA – These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA – Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items, which the Commission will discuss individually, usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS – These items are usually heard on the first Tuesdays at 6 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on the third Tuesday, which begins at 9 a.m., then public hearings will be heard at 9 a.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chair will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes, and must be pertinent to the agenda item being considered by the Board. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chair will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION – Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS – These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT – Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to three minutes. Comments may pertain to any matter related to the Board’s duties as the County’s governing body. Comments in support or opposition to candidates for public office are not pertinent to the Board’s duties. This includes any speaker identifying himself or herself as a candidate for public office. DECORUM – Please be respectful of others’ opinions. MEETINGS – All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first Tuesdays of each month at 6 p.m. and on the third Tuesdays at 9 a.m., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Fort Pierce, Fla. 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Human Resources Department at 772-462-1456, HumanResources@stlucieco.org or TDD 772-462-1428 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Page 2 of 78 Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 20, 2024 1:00 PM 3 | P a g e 1.CALL TO ORDER 2.GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 3.APPROVAL OF MINUTES A.Board of County Commissioners minutes for the Mosquito Control District Meeting of January 23, 2024. 4.CONSENT AGENDA A.WARRANTS 1.Warrant Lists 16 - 19 B.ADMINISTRATION 1.2024 State and Federal Program Staff recommends the Board accept the 2024 State and Federal Program. C.MOSQUITO CONTROL 1.Bear Point Mitigation Bank Credit Purchase Agreement - Sandpiper Resort Mangroves Staff recommends that the Mosquito Control District approve the Bear Point Mitigation Bank Credit Purchase Agreement to complete the sale of Mitigation Bank credits and process the payment in the amount of $72,000.00, and authorize the Chair to sign the documents as prepared and reviewed by the County Attorney. 2.Mapvision Hardware Upgrade - Contract C16-05-262 - Second Amendment Staff recommends Board approval of Contract C16-05-262 - Second Amendment, for the MapVsion Hardware upgrade, and the increase to the MapVsion Software License Agreement #C16-05-262, which includes the Software License Agreement and the MapVision Annual Service and Support. 5.REGULAR AGENDA There are no items scheduled. Page 3 of 78 Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 20, 2024 1:00 PM 4 | P a g e 6.MOTION TO ADJOURN Page 4 of 78 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Mosquito Control District Meeting January 23, 2024 Convened: 1:13 PM Adjourned: 1:13 PM 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 1:13 PM by Chair Larry Leet, District No. 2. Present Commissioner Cathy Townsend District 5, Commissioner Linda Bartz District 3, Commissioner Chris Dzadovsky District 1, Commissioner Larry Leet District 2, Commissioner Jamie Fowler District 4 Also Present Dan McIntyre, County Attorney George Landry, County Administrator Mayte Santamaria, Deputy County Administrator Jason Davis, Deputy County Administrator Jennifer Hill, OMB Director Barbara Guettler, MSBU Coordinator Joshua Revord, Port Director Benjamin Balcer, Planning & Development Services Director Kori Benton, Planning & Development Services Planning Manager Katrina Slay, Agenda Coordinator Vera Smith, Deputy Clerk Recording Secretary 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT Chair Leet opened the meeting for public comment at this time. With no one wishing to address the Board, Chair Leet closed public comment. 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A motion was made to approve all minute sets, and it passed unanimously. RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commissioner District 4 Jamie Fowler SECONDER: Commissioner District 3 Linda Bartz AYES: Cathy Townsend, Linda Bartz, Chris Dzadovsky, Larry Leet, Jamie Fowler NAYS: None EXCUSED: None A. Board of County Commissioners minutes for the Mosquito Control District Meeting of Page 5 of 78 Mosquito Control District Meeting Tuesday, January 23, 2024 1:00 PM 2 | Page December 12, 2023. 4. CONSENT AGENDA A motion was made to adopt the consent agenda, and it passed unanimously. RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commissioner District 5 Cathy Townsend SECONDER: Commissioner District 4 Jamie Fowler AYES: Cathy Townsend, Linda Bartz, Chris Dzadovsky, Larry Leet, Jamie Fowler NAYS: None EXCUSED: None A. WARRANTS 1. Warrant Lists 10 - 15 Adopted by Consent Vote 5. REGULAR AGENDA There were no items scheduled. 6. MOTION TO ADJOURN With no other information to be brought for consideration before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 1:13 PM. Please note: Final minutes are recorded in the official minute books filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court and available for inspection upon request. Page 6 of 78 01/19/24 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 1 FZABWARR WARRANT LIST #16- 13-JAN-2024 TO 19-JAN-2024 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 145 Mosquito Fund 22,743.96 51,284.86 GRAND TOTAL: 22,743.96 51,284.86 Page 7 of 78 01/26/24 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 1 FZABWARR WARRANT LIST #17- 20-JAN-2024 TO 26-JAN-2024 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 145 Mosquito Fund 17,951.97 0.00 147 Bear Point Mitigation Fund 50.00 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 18,001.97 0.00 Page 8 of 78 02/02/24 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 1 FZABWARR WARRANT LIST #18- 27-JAN-2024 TO 02-FEB-2024 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 145 Mosquito Fund 6,853.47 52,820.75 147 Bear Point Mitigation Fund 192.00 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 7,045.47 52,820.75 Page 9 of 78 02/09/24 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 1 FZABWARR WARRANT LIST #19- 03-FEB-2024 TO 09-FEB-2024 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 145 Mosquito Fund 26,236.39 0.00 147 Bear Point Mitigation Fund 4,720.00 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 30,956.39 0.00 Page 10 of 78 4.B.1. 2024-64378 CONSENT AGENDA - GOVERNMENT RELATIONS AGENDA REQUEST DATE: 2/20/2024 *ACTION ITEM - BOARD ACCEPTANCE QUASI-JUDICIAL ITEM? No TO: Board of County Commissioners PRESENTED BY: Courtney Calderone, Government Relations Division Director SUBMITTED BY: Government Relations SUBJECT: 2024 State and Federal Program BACKGROUND: Annually, the Board of County Commissioners approves the State and Federal legislative priorities to guide the County's lobbying efforts at the state and federal level. Staff is seeking acceptance by this District to further support the County's 2024 Legislative Programs. PREVIOUS ACTION: December 5, 2023 - BOCC approval of the 2024 Federal Program. September 19, 2023 - BOCC approval of the 2024 State Program. FINANCIAL IMPACT: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board accept the 2024 State and Federal Program. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: MOVER: None SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures Page 11 of 78 Date: February 07, 2024 Courtney Calderone, Government Relations Division Director Date: February 08, 2024 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: February 08, 2024 George Landry, County Administrator Page 12 of 78 State Legislative Program2024 ST. LUCIE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Inmate Medical Cap Local Bill As a measure to contain the high cost of inmate medical care, this proposed bill will reduce expenses by setting a reimbursement amount paid by St. Lucie County to medical providers for health care services for inmates and arrestees. Compensation is limited to 110% of the Medicare allowable rate, or 125% of the Medicare allowable rate if the health care provider reported a negative operating margin for the previous year. The proposed local bill would place the same limits on providers of emergency medical transportation services and provide St. Lucie County with similar protections to those currently in place for the Florida Department of Corrections (F.S. 945.6041). Home Rule Authority Over Florida PACE Loan Providers St. Lucie County proposes an amendment to FS 163.08 to clarify that “Any local government, including a separate legal entity created pursuant to s. 163.01(7), must have the written consent of each other county or municipality within which it intends to operate through an interlocal agreement before providing and financing qualifying improvements within that county or municipality.” Since 2010, the Florida Statutes have allowed for Property Assessed Clean Energy (PACE) loans in Florida. Specifically, the Florida legislature allows property owners to voluntarily finance improvements with local government assistance, and FS 163.08 (2)(a) defines local government as follows: “Local government” means a county, a municipality, a dependent special district as defined in s. 189.012, or a separate legal entity created pursuant to s. 163.01(7). There are several PACE providers originating PACE loans across Florida operating as “a separate legal entity created pursuant to FS 163.01(7).” It is St. Lucie County’s position that PACE loan providers do not have the legal authority to provide loans without an executed interlocal agreement with the local government in whose jurisdiction they intend to provide loans, and that State law should be clarified so that the PACE loan provider needs specific authorization from a local government to operate within that local government’s jurisdiction. Ten Mile Creek – Indian River Lagoon South A critical component of the Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Program (CERP) is the Indian River Lagoon-South (IRL-S) suite of projects. This includes the C23/C24 STA and Reservoir system, located in the western part of St. Lucie County. This new system will include a northern diversion canal which will provide a resource for excess stormwater to be discharged when the system calls for it. The outfall for the excess water is a natural tidally influenced waterway known as Ten Mile Creek. Ten Mile Creek is one of St. Lucie County’s main drainage conveyances and runs straight down the middle of the county, impacting many larger residential communities, and eventually draining to the St. Lucie River and Estuary. St. Lucie County supports coordination with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, South Florida Water Management District, US Army Corp of Engineers, the 298s, and the public to address the critical system impact of Ten Mile Creek and its influence on drainage and water quality for County residents. The ongoing studies, assessments, modeling, and data collection efforts are vital to the outcome of the project. The County acknowledges that funding must be identified and secured to implement solutions to Ten Milke Creek- Indian River Lagoon South. Streamlined Permitting for Railroad Crossings The County supports increased cooperation between Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) and Florida East Coast Railroad (FEC) and local governments to facilitate streamlined permitting to ensure secure railway crossings. STATE LEGISLATIVE PRIORITIES Page 13 of 78 St. Lucie County Appropriation Request: Secondary Data Center for Continuity of Operations and Continuity of Government Total Project Cost: $10,000,000 Requested Amount: $5,000,000 | County Match: $5,000,000 The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners has one Information Technology data center that supports the County, Constitutionals, and law enforcement. This single point of failure puts these organizations at risk. The proposed secondary data center is designed to support large- scale applications to ensure the essential functions continue during a critical event or situation. The proposed data center will have built-in security and scalability features as well as onsite and internet-based accessibility. Housed in a controlled environment, the secondary data center will have computing resources including applications servers, file and printer servers, communication servers, application software and operating systems to run them. The project will also include storage subsystems and the network infrastructure. St. Lucie County Local Government Funding Request (LGFR): Fort Pierce Shore Protection Total Project Cost: $3,481,474 Requested Amount: $1,740,737 | County Match: $1,740,737 The Fort Pierce Shore Protection project is a federally authorized project and consists of the restoration and maintenance of 2.3 miles of Atlantic shoreline in Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County. Initial restoration of the project area began in 1971 with the construction of a 1.3-mile segment of beach immediately south of the Fort Pierce Inlet. The present long-term management plan for restoration of the entire 2.3-mile shoreline consists of sand placement in the original northern 1.3-mile segment, creating a natural feeder beach for the southern portion of the project. The next scheduled nourishment event is proposed in Spring 2025. St. Lucie County Local Government Funding Request (LGFR): Fort Pierce Inlet Sand Trap Phase 1 Excavation Total Project Cost: $5,410,000 Requested Amount: $2,705,000 | County Match: $2,705,000 The Fort Pierce Shore Protection Project is a federally authorized project and consists of the restoration and maintenance of 2.3 miles of Atlantic shoreline immediately south of the Fort Pierce Inlet. A sand trap was constructed and sited just inside the Fort Pierce Inlet, near the north jetty, to capture sand migration from adjacent beaches. This sand is available for placement onto the down- drift beach. As of February 2023, the Fort Pierce Sand Trap (Phase I) had surpassed design capacity and was ready for excavation. The state may cost share at 50% for future maintenance dredging. St. Lucie County Florida Seaports Priority Project List: Property Acquisition Requested Amount: $10,000,000 The Port of Fort Pierce has identified property acquisition as its unfunded priority. St. Lucie County is developing a regional stormwater solution for the undeveloped portions of the port. The preliminary identified land is located within the Port Planning Area, but the County is not the primary landowner. Additionally, there are strategic parcels that are adjacent to the port’s terminal that, if acquired, could assist in the expansion of the current Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul (MRO) operations. Property acquisition will be critical in the future development of the Port of Fort Pierce. APPROPRIATIONS Page 14 of 78 St. Lucie County supports Home Rule, opposes Unfunded Mandates, and opposes efforts to reduce local government revenue sources or limit flexibility in how they are spent. This guiding principle includes the County’s opposition to legislation that would create cost shifts from traditionally state responsibilities, circumvent local oversight of development or tax issues, limit local control of critical services, or impact our ability to provide a responsive and reflective local government to our constituents. We also support legislation that creates additional financial flexibility for local budgets, enhances local control of policies and procedures impacting our residents and allows our County to – with the utmost responsiveness – meet the needs of the community. St. Lucie County supports efforts and investment in Economic Development initiatives that both contribute to the further diversification of our state and local economies and supports tourism and cultural foundations upon which so much of our regional impact depends on. This guiding principle includes the County’s support for things such as full funding for Visit Florida, the Florida Job Growth Grant Fund, and the Department of State’s Arts and Cultural Grants. St. Lucie County supports key investments into Environmental and Natural Resources that protect Florida’s fragile environment, strengthens our resilience against the impacts of climate change, addresses the stresses and impacts of continued growth on our Lagoon, lakes, rivers, streams, beaches, and ocean. This guiding principle includes water and environmental projects critical to the county and region, comprehensive Everglades restoration, beach and inlet management and restoration, hurricane supplemental funding, and investments into the health and sustainability of the Indian River Lagoon. St. Lucie County supports robust investment in public infrastructure that supports both planned and potential growth, strengthens transportation and communication networks, and provides greater mobility and accessibility for our residents. This guiding principle includes full funding of Florida’s Transportation Five-Year Work Plan through State Transportation Trust Fund including appropriate funding for road construction, public transit, deep water seaports such as the Port of Fort Pierce, airports such as the Treasure Coast International Airport, and the Strategic Intermodal System. It also includes expansion of state-supported broadband, public access trail networks, funding for septic to sewer conversion and waste to energy projects, and other investments that enhance the quality of life for all of St. Lucie County’s residents. 2024 Guiding Principles ST. LUCIE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Page 15 of 78 St. Lucie County supports funding equity in critical public safety investments. This guiding principle includes appropriate state funding for required school safety and resource officers, fair cost share of inmate medical costs and juvenile justice per diem rates, increased investment into the county Emergency Operations Center, and proper recurring funding of Mental Health Court. St. Lucie County supports better partnership and cost share of critical public health and human services. This guiding principle includes advocating for a cap on county Medicaid cost growth, more robust funding for mental health and substance abuse treatment and opposing efforts to modify or underfund the public health system and the role of county health departments. It also includes appropriate statewide funding for homelessness, county-specific appropriations projects, and funding for Healthy Families and Community Healthcare Clinics. St. Lucie County supports affordable housing initiatives. This guiding principle includes full funding of the state’s affordable housing trust fund, addressing the home insurance crisis, expanding local discretion for the local option property tax exemption, designating a state entity responsible for enforcing and monitoring certain aspects of the Live Local Act, providing clear criteria for local governments to utilize when identifying parcels in compliance with affordable housing per ss. 125.379 and 166.0451 and consider including an enforcement mechanism, expand infrastructure surtax statute to clearly include construction costs for affordable housing development, modernize the Affordable Housing Advisory Committee (AHAC) reporting requirement, and create a grant program to support local land use reform for affordable housing. St. Lucie County supports increased funding for public education and wrap around services that promote lifelong learning and personal advancement. This guiding principle includes not only adequate state funding for K12 and early learning, but higher education investments at Indian River State College with capital (PECO) and operating dollars that enhance the quality of education and skill development opportunities available to our residents. It also includes funding for education wrap around services such as career and college counseling. St. Lucie County supports financial investment and public policy optimization that leads to the continued transformation of Florida’s critically important agriculture industry and prepares it for a sustainable future. This guiding principle includes investments into UF/IFAS St. Lucie County-based research and development projects, aquaculture research, and Florida’s 4-H programs including others. 911 Public Safety Telecommunicators. St. Lucie County supports legislation that would help the recruitment and retention of 911 Public Safety Telecommunicators. Page 16 of 78 St. Lucie County opposes unfunded mandates and efforts to reduce local government revenue sources or limit flexibility in how they are spent. The County opposes legislation that shifts costs from traditionally federal responsibilities, circumvents local oversight, limits local control, or impacts our ability to provide effective local services to our constituents. We also support legislation that creates additional financial flexibility, enhances local control of policies and procedures, and allows our County to – with the utmost responsiveness – meet the needs of the community. St. Lucie County supports robust investment in public infrastructure that supports both planned and potential growth, strengthens transportation and communication networks, and provides greater mobility and accessibility for our residents. The County supports maintaining funding from the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) and the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) to enhance investment in our roads, railroad safety, bridges, transit, the Port of Fort Pierce, beaches and coastal amenities, environment, and the Strategic Intermodal System. We also support funding from those and other bills to support the expansion of broadband, increasing broadband affordability, and other investments that enhance the quality of life for St. Lucie County residents. St. Lucie County supports key federal investments into projects and programs that protect Florida’s environment, strengthens resilience against the impacts of storm and climate change, and addresses the health of our waterways, including but not limited to the Indian River Lagoon, lakes, rivers, streams, beaches, and oceans. The County supports funding and authorization necessary for St. Lucie County’s two federal Army Corps of Engineers beach nourishment projects: Fort Pierce and St. Lucie County, comprehensive Everglades restoration – including completion of the entire Indian River Lagoon-South project – completion of a Lake Okeechobee System Operating Manual that benefits our local waters, protection of offshore sand sources for the County’s future use, opposition to the expansion of offshore fossil fuel energy development near Florida, and continued investments into the health and sustainability of the Indian River Lagoon. St. Lucie County supports federal engagement to address the nation’s mental health and opioid crises and invest in services to help with aging services and research. The County supports expanded treatment options for the mentally ill, the preservation of Medicare and Medicaid, supports funding for programs that address the opioid epidemic, federal funding for Alzheimer’s and dementia research at the National Institute on Aging, and annual funding for Older Americans Act programs that support critical social service programs serving elder persons in St. Lucie County. St. Lucie County supports ongoing investments in community development and homelessness assistance programs to support our most vulnerable populations as well as efforts to increase access to affordable housing. The County supports programs such as the HOME Investment Partnerships, Community Development Block Grant, Community Services Block Grant, and the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, among others. This also includes Homeless Assistance Grants, particularly for the Continuum of Care Program from which the County benefits. Further, the County supports adjusting area median income (AMI) calculations developed by the Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) to include more location-specific data rather than larger Metropolitan Statistical Areas determined by the Census Bureau. This precise data would allow for more accurate AMI calculations to be used for lower income individuals to whom HUD assistance should be targeted and increase affordable housing access for those most in need. St. Lucie County supports federal legislation that ensures detained individuals and inmates have adequate medical care and maintain access to federal benefits. The County supports addressing federal policies that contribute to the national behavioral and mental health crisis and seeks to reduce rates of recidivism in our local jails. The County takes a holistic approach to protect public wellbeing and make our community a healthier and safer place for our residents and visitors. FederalPROGRAM Guiding Principles 2024 Page 17 of 78 1. Explore all opportunities during the Fiscal Year 2025 appropriations process to secure federal funding for key St. Lucie County priorities. These include:  Necessary funding to initiate the Preconstruction Engineering and Design phase of the next iteration of the Fort Pierce Beach project via the Army Corps of Engineers.  Support funding to implement the Army Corps of Engineers Section 219 environmental infrastructure authorization included in the Water Resources Development Act of 2022 for St. Lucie, Martin, and Palm Beach counties. 2. Support St. Lucie County’s efforts to extend the runway at the Treasure Coast International Airport with appropriate federal agencies now that the county has secured appropriated funds in the FY23 Federal Omnibus bill for the project to extend the primary runway at the airport by 1,008 feet, for a total length of 7,500 feet. This extension will assist the airport in accommodating commercial aircraft most heavily utilized by carriers likely to provide service to the Airport. 3. Support the County in its efforts to secure the Part 139 Certification at the Treasure Coast International Airport. Part 139 will create jobs and encourage economic development. 4. St. Lucie County supports appropriate federal funding to help respond to the impacts of hurricanes and other disasters, including from Hurricanes Ian and Nicole, particularly relating to Army Corps of Engineers funding to restore the County’s two federal shore protection projects to their pre-storm conditions. 5. St. Lucie County supports the prudent implementation of the Army Corps of Engineers’ policy regarding perpetual construction easements. Reasonable engineering discretion is required to determine how “integral” specific real estate is to the performance of a federal beach project. The Corps should allow for Jacksonville District discretion in determining how unacquired easements impact project performance. The County supports legislative action that ensures that shore protection projects with minimal real estate challenges can proceed without delay, as originally authorized by Congress. 6. St. Lucie County supports the ongoing federal Fort Pierce Beach Section 203/403 Conditional Authorization effort, which includes a new 50-year beach project life/agreement with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) and the addition of T-groin structures to better manage regional sands. St. Lucie County and the Port of Fort Pierce support maritime requests which will assist in the economic development of the port, most importantly in policy and funding initiatives. 7. St. Lucie County supports the expansion of an existing Opportunity Zone to include the Port of Fort Pierce and Harbour Point to enhance economic development opportunities. 8. Support St. Lucie County applications for competitive federal grant programs, including but not limited to, opportunities created by the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law (BIL) and the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). 9. St. Lucie County supports a statute of limitations be approved regarding future claw backs of state and local funding from the American Rescue Plan Act. www.StLucieCo.gov FederalPROGRAM Priorities: Appropriations and Policies 2024 Page 18 of 78 ITEM NO. (ID # 2024-64322) DATE: 2/20/2024 AGENDA REQUEST TO: Mosquito Control District PRESENTED BY: Roger Jacobsen, Mosquito Control Director SUBMITTED BY: Mosquito Control SUBJECT: Bear Point Mitigation Bank Credit Purchase Agreement - Sandpiper Resort Mangroves BACKGROUND: The Bear Point Mitigation Bank offers secure and beneficial environmental credits that help to improve the health of the Indian River Lagoon. It is a 317-acre mangrove saltwater marsh located in St. Lucie County and has operated successfully along the Lagoon near Fort Pierce since 2003. The bank, permitted by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers sell Mangrove Forest credits that are valued in terms of the ecological value of the Mitigation Bank. The funds collected are used to preserve and maintain wetland habitat as a way of sustaining the ecological and hydrological functions of the Indian River Lagoon. The primary service covers the barrier islands and the mainland Indian River waterfront from the Sebastian Inlet on the north to St. Lucie Inlet on the south. The purchase agreement outlines the sale of Mitigation Bank credits required by FDEP for the applicant to offset their development's estuarine impact. Please see the included Bear Point Mitigation Bank Credit Purchase Agreement - Sandpiper Resort Mangroves PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FINANCIAL IMPACT: The developer, Store Capital Acquisitions, LLC, c/o Chad Freed and Altitude Hospitality, LLC, c/o Keith Lee will pay St. Lucie County Mosquito Control the sum of $72,000.00 for .4 State credits. Upon receipt, this revenue will be posted into Revenue Account Number 147-0000-369960-000 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Mosquito Control District approve the Bear Point Mitigation Bank Credit Purchase Agreement to complete the sale of Mitigation Bank credits and process the payment in the amount of $72,000.00, and authorize the Chair to sign the documents as prepared and reviewed by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: RESULT: Page 19 of 78 MOVER: None SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures Date: January 25, 2024 Roger Jacobsen, Mosquito Control Director Date: February 01, 2024 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: February 02, 2024 Jason Davis, Deputy County Administrator I Page 20 of 78 1 MITIGATION BANK CREDIT PURCHASE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this ______ day of _______________, ________, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, (“County”), whose address is 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida, 34982, STORE CAPITAL ACQUISITIUONS, LLC c/o Chad Freed, 8377 E. Hartford Dr., Ste 100, Scottsdale, AZ 85255 and ALTITUDE HOSPITALITY, LLC c/o Keith Lee, 4500 SE Pine Valley St., Pt. St. Lucie, FL 34952 (the “Buyer”), for the project known as Sandpiper Resort Mangroves . WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County owns and operates the Bear Point Mitigation Bank, (“Bank”); and, WHEREAS, the Buyer has entered into a Consent Order (OGC File No. 23-1762) with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (“Agency”) for certain property lying in the Bank’s Mitigation Service Area; and, WHEREAS, the Consent Order requires the Buyer to purchase credits in the Bank; and, WHEREAS, in accordance with the Consent Order, the Buyer desires to purchase 0.40 State Credits from the Bank. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. The County agrees to sell and the Buyer agrees to purchase 0.40 State Credits in accordance with the Consent Order. The purchase price for the Credits is Seventy-Two thousand and 00/100 dollars ($72,000.00). 2. The Buyer shall pay the purchase price for the Credits to the County in full within thirty (30) days of the date of this Agreement. Payment shall be delivered to the St. Lucie County Finance Director, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL 34982. Upon payment in full of the purchase price, the County shall issue a written receipt to the Buyer acknowledging such payment. In the event the purchase price is not paid in full within thirty (30) days of the date of this Agreement, this Agreement shall be null and void and the County shall make the above-referenced Credits available to other parties. 3. It shall be the responsibility of the Buyer to provide the Agency with a copy of the receipt or other acceptable proof indicating purchase of the Credits. 4. Any disputes relating to interpretation of the terms of this Agreement or a question of fact or arising under this Agreement shall be resolved through good faith efforts upon the part of the Buyer and the County. Any dispute which is not resolved by mutual agreement shall be decided by the County Administrator who shall reduce the decision to writing. The decision of the County shall be final and conclusive unless determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be fraudulent, capricious, arbitrary, so grossly erroneous as to necessarily imply bad faith, or not be supported by substantial Page 21 of 78 2 evidence. 5. Prior to initiating any litigation concerning this Agreement, the parties agree to submit the disputed issue or issues to a mediator for non-binding mediation. The parties shall agree on a mediator chosen from a list of certified mediators available from the Clerk of Court for St. Lucie County. The fee of the mediator shall be shared equally by the parties. To the extent allowed by law, the mediation process shall be confidential and the results of the mediation or any testimony or argument introduced at the mediation shall not be admissible as evidence in any subsequent proceeding concerning the disputed issue. 6. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreements between the parties with respect thereto. This Agreement may only be amended by written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by both parties hereto. This Agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Agreement, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit for St. Lucie County, Florida, for claims under state law and the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Agreement to be executed on the day first above written. WITNESSES: ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ____________________________ BY:______________________________________ COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR ____________________________ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: __________________________________________ COUNTY ATTORNEY ATTEST: STORE CAPITAL ACQUISITIONS, LLC BY:_____________________________________ PRESIDENT _____________________________ ALTITUDE HOSPITALITY, LLC SECRETARY BY:______________________________________ PRESIDENT (SEAL) Page 22 of 78 3 S:\atty\agreemnt\contract\bearpt.Sandpiper Resort Mangrove Page 23 of 78 www.FloridaDEP.gov FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF Environmental Protection Southeast District Office 3301 Gun Club Road, MSC 7210-1 West Palm Beach, FL 33406 561-681-6600 Ron DeSantis Governor Jeanette Nuñez Lt. Governor Shawn Hamilton Secretary January 23, 2024 Store Capital Acquisitions, LLC c/o Chad Freed, 8377 E. Hartford Dr., STE 100 Scottsdale, AZ 85255 cfreed@storecapital.com Altitude Hospitality, LLC c/o Keith Lee 4500 SE Pine Valley Street, Port Saint Lucie, FL 34952 klee@feenixpartners.com SUBJECT: Department of Environmental Protection v. Store Capital Acquisitions, LLC & Altitude Hospitality LLC OGC File No.: 23-1762 St. Lucie County Dear Mr. Freed and Mr. Lee, Enclosed is the executed Consent Order to resolve the above referenced case. This copy is for your records. Please be mindful of all required deadlines within the Order to ensure compliance. Should you have any questions or comments, please contact Patricia Andrade at 561-681-6629 or via e-mail at Patricia.Andrade@FloridaDEP.gov. Sincerely, Sirena Davila Director, Southeast District Florida Department of Environmental Protection Enclosure: Consent Order and Attachments I - V For Page 24 of 78 Department of Environmental Protection v. Store Capital Acquisitions, LLC & Altitude Hospitality, LLC OGC File No.: 23-1762 Site No.: 435405; Project No.: 410938 Page 2 of 2 ec: Sirena Davila, FDEP – SED, Sirena.Davila@FloridaDEP.gov Luciano Guidoni, FDEP – SED, Luciano.Guidoni@FloridaDEP.gov Patricia Andrade, FDEP-SED, Patricia.Andrade@FloridaDEP.gov Jon W. Moore, FDEP-SED, Jon.W.Moore@FloridaDEP.gov Sara Armour, FDEP, Sara.Armour@FloridaDEP.gov Jason Andreotta, FDEP, Jason.Andreotta@FloridaDEP.gov Jessica Kramer, FDEP, Jessica.L.Kramer@FloridaDEP.gov Irene Arpayoglou, FDEP, Irene.Arpayoglou@dep.state.fl.us Alex Kuchta, FDEP, Alexandra.Kuchta@FloridaDEP.gov Jerry Breslin, Schwartz | Breslin PLLC, jb@jsjb.law Mike Garafolo, Capital Build Group, mike@capitolfl.com Tim Atkinson, tatkinson@ohfc.com Maegan Wettlaufer, Cox Pinson Environmental Solutions, maegan@cpenviro.net David Cox, Cox Pinson Environmental Solutions, david@cpenviro.net Lyena Hale, Store Capital Acquisitions, lhale@storecapital.com Page 25 of 78 SLERP/CO 11/2022 BEFORE THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT ) IN THE OFFICE OF THE OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION ) SOUTHEAST DISTRICT ) Complainant, ) ) OGC FILE NO. 23-1762 vs. ) ) STORE CAPITAL ACQUISITIONS, LLC ) ) and ) ) ALTITUDE HOSPITALITY, LLC ) ) Respondents. ) ) CONSENT ORDER This Consent Order is entered into between the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection ("Department"), Store Capital Acquisitions, LLC (“Respondent Store Capital”) and Altitude Hospitality, LLC (“Respondent Altitude Hospitality”), collectively known as Respondents herein after, to reach settlement of certain matters at issue between the Department and Respondents. The Department finds and the Respondents admit the following: 1.The Department is the administrative agency of the State of Florida having the power and duty to protect Florida's air and water resources and to administer and enforce Chapter 373, Part IV, and Chapter 403, Florida Statutes (F.S.), and the rules promulgated and authorized thereunder, Title 62, Florida Administrative Code (F.A.C.). The Department has jurisdiction over the matters addressed in this Consent Order. 2.Respondents are each “persons” within the meaning of sections 253.04 and 373.019(15), F.S. Page 26 of 78 SLERP/CO 11/2022 3.Respondent Store Capital is the owner of property located at 4500 SE Pine Valley St., Port St Lucie, FL, in St. Lucie County (Parcel No. 4423-210-0001-000-3), approximately at 27°14'33.3406" x -80°18'35.7815") as depicted in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein. 4.Respondent Altitude Hospitality leases the Property and conducted the activities described in paragraph 5 below. 5.An inspection conducted by Department personnel on May 10 and 17, 2023, revealed that approximately 17,789 sq. ft. of mangroves were altered without a valid permit from the Department, in violation of section 403.9328, F.S. An inspection conducted on May 31, 2023, revealed that unauthorized filling of wetlands (mangrove fringe) and other surface waters had occurred, in violation of section 403.9328, F.S., and Rules 18-20.004 and 62-330.020, F.A.C., and a surface water quality exceedance was noted for turbidity, in violation of Rule 62-302.700, F.A.C. The activities were conducted on the above-described property within the landward and waterward extent of North Fork St. Lucie Aquatic Preserve and Outstanding Florida Waters, Class III Waters of the State, as defined by Florida Law. Having reached a resolution of the matter Respondent and the Department mutually agree and it is, ORDERED: 6.Within 30 days of the effective date of this Consent Order, Respondent Altitude Hospitality shall pay the Department $110,395.00 in settlement of the matters addressed in this Consent Order. This amount includes $1,000.00 for costs and expenses incurred by the Department during the investigation of this matter and the preparation and tracking of this Consent Order. The penalty in this case includes four violations of $2,000.00 or more. 7.Respondent Altitude Hospitality shall make all payments required by this Order by cashier's check, money order or online payment. Cashier’s check or money order shall be made payable to the “Department of Environmental Protection” and shall include both the OGC number assigned to this Order and the notation “Water Quality Page 27 of 78 SLERP/CO 11/2022 Assurance Trust Fund.” Online payments by e-check can be made by going to the DEP Business Portal at http://www.fldepportal.com/go/pay/ It will take a number of days after this order becomes final, effective and filed with the Clerk of the Department before ability to make online payment is available. 8. Respondent Store Capital shall allow Respondent Altitude Hospitality and its representatives access to the Property to see through completion of all corrective actions required by this Order. 9. Within 90 days of the effective date of this Order, Respondent Altitude Hospitality shall submit a written estimate of the total cost of the corrective actions required by this Order to the Department. The written estimate shall identify the information the Respondent relied upon to provide the estimate. 10. With the exception of the activities described in the Restoration Actions, effective immediately and henceforth, Respondents shall not conduct any dredging, filling, or construction activities on or within the landward extent of waters of the state without first obtaining a valid Department permit or written notification from the Department that the activities appear to be exempt as proposed from Department permitting requirements; nor shall Respondents conduct any activities on state owned lands below the ordinary or mean high water lines without first obtaining a lease, easement, or other consent of use from the Department. 11. Respondent Altitude Hospitality shall implement the Restoration Actions attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment I in the manner and within the time frames specified therein. 12. Once the Restoration Actions have been completed, Respondent Altitude Hospitality shall implement the Maintenance and Monitoring Actions attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment II in the manner and within the time frames specified therein. 13. Within 60 days of the effective date of this Order, Respondent Altitude Hospitality shall submit a request to the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners or the County Administrator ("the County") to purchase 0.4 Mangrove Credits form Bear Point Mitigation Bank to offset the temporal loss of function from Page 28 of 78 SLERP/CO 11/2022 the impacts to the mangrove fringe which meets the assessment requirements of Rule 62-345, F.A.C. 14. Within 60 days of approval by the County, Respondent Altitude Hospitality shall complete the purchase of credits and provide the Department with documentation demonstrating the deduction of credits from the Bear Point's Mitigation Bank's ledger for this case. 15. Within 180 days of the effective date of this Order, Respondents shall complete all of the following for the execution of a Declaration and Covenant of Mangrove Regulation ("Declaration"), which is attached and incorporated hereto as Attachment III: a) Submit to the Department a professional surveyor sketch of the Restoration Area to be subject to the Declaration, and a legal description of the Property; b) Retain a title company to perform a title search to be submitted directly to the Department for review; c) Submit to the Department subordination agreements for all mortgage and lien holders; if a mortgage or lienholder declines to enter into a subordination agreement, Trustees shall complete the following: (i) submit to the Department documentation evidencing the refusal to subordinate, and (ii) provide written notice of executing the Declaration to the lienholder(s) if requested by the Department; d) Upon Department approval, sign the approved Declaration and submit to the Department; e) Upon approval, the title company will record the Declaration in the official land records of St. Lucie County and submit a copy of the recorded Declaration, evidencing the recordation date and book and page number(s) of the official land records. 16. The purpose of the Declaration is to impose mangrove trimming and Page 29 of 78 SLERP/CO 11/2022 alteration restrictions for the restoration of the height and configuration of the mangroves on the Property that existed prior to the April 2023 through May 2023 unauthorized trimming and alteration activities. Upon completion of all success criteria, Respondent may request of the declaration from the Department, the mangroves within the Restoration Area shall be allowed to grow to the following minimum heights before requesting release of the Declaration: a) Area A as depicted in Exhibit B of this Order shall reach an average of at least 10 feet as measured from substrate. b) Area B as depicted in Exhibit B of this Order shall reach an average of at least 25 feet as measured from substrate. 17. Respondents agree to pay the Department stipulated penalties in the amount of $1,000.00 per day for each and every day Respondents fail to timely comply with any of the requirements of this Consent Order applicable to them. A separate stipulated penalty shall be assessed for each violation of this Order. Within 30 days of written demand from the Department, Respondent Altitude Hospitality shall make payment of the appropriate stipulated penalties to the "The Department of Environmental Protection" by cashier's check or money order and shall include thereon the OGC number assigned to this Consent Order and the notation "Water Quality Assurance Trust Fund." The Department may make demands for payment at any time after violations occur. Nothing in this paragraph shall prevent the Department from filing suit to specifically enforce any of the terms of this Consent Order. Any penalties assessed under this paragraph shall be in addition to the settlement sum agreed to in paragraph 6 of this Consent Order. If the Department is required to file a lawsuit to recover stipulated penalties under this paragraph, the Department will not be foreclosed from seeking civil penalties for violations of this Consent Order in an amount greater than the stipulated penalties due under this paragraph. 18. If any event, including administrative or judicial challenges by third parties unrelated to the Respondents, occurs which causes delay or the reasonable likelihood of delay, in complying with the requirements of this Consent Order, Page 30 of 78 SLERP/CO 11/2022 Respondents shall have the burden of proving the delay was or will be caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of the Respondents and could not have been or cannot be overcome by Respondents due diligence. Economic circumstances shall not be considered circumstances beyond the control of Respondents, nor shall the failure of a contractor, subcontractor, materialman or other agent (collectively referred to as "contractor") to whom responsibility for performance is delegated to meet contractually imposed deadlines be a cause beyond the control of Respondents, unless the cause of the contractor's late performance was also beyond the contractor's control. Upon occurrence of an event causing delay, or upon becoming aware of a potential for delay, Respondents shall notify the Department orally within 24 hours or by the next working day and shall, within seven calendar days of oral notification to the Department, notify the Department in writing of the anticipated length and cause of the delay, the measures taken or to be taken to prevent or minimize the delay and the timetable by which Respondents intend to implement these measures. If the parties can agree that the delay or anticipated delay has been or will be caused by circumstances beyond the reasonable control of Respondents, the time for performance hereunder shall be extended for a period equal to the agreed delay resulting from such circumstances. Such agreement shall adopt all reasonable measures necessary to avoid or minimize delay. Failure of Respondents to comply with the notice requirements of this Paragraph in a timely manner shall constitute a waiver of Respondents’ right to request an extension of time for compliance with the requirements of this Consent Order. 19. Respondents shall allow all authorized representatives of the Department access to the property at reasonable times for the purpose of determining compliance with the terms of this Consent Order and the rules and statutes of the Department. 20. Entry of this Consent Order does not relieve Respondents of the need to comply with applicable federal, state or local laws, regulations or ordinances. 21. The terms and conditions set forth in this Consent Order may be enforced in a court of competent jurisdiction pursuant to Sections 120.69 and 373.129, Florida Page 31 of 78 SLERP/CO 11/2022 Statutes. Failure to comply with the terms of this Consent Order shall constitute a violation of Section 373.430, Florida Statutes. 22. Respondents are fully aware that a violation of the terms of this Consent Order may subject Respondents to judicial imposition of damages, civil penalties of up to $15,000 per day per violation and administrative fines of up to $10,000 per day per violation and criminal penalties. 23. Persons who are not parties to this Consent Order but whose substantial interests are affected by this Consent Order have a right, pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes, to petition for an administrative hearing on it. The Petition must contain the information set forth below and must be filed (received) at the Department's Office of General Counsel, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, MS-35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000, or received via electronic correspondence at Agency_Clerk@floridadep.gov, within 21 days of receipt of this notice. A copy of the Petition must also be mailed at the time of filing to the District Office named above at the address indicated. Failure to file a petition within the 21 days constitutes a waiver of any right such person has to an administrative hearing pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes. The petition shall contain the following information: a) The name and address of each agency affected and each agency’s file or identification number, if known; b) The name, address, any e-mail address, any facsimile number, and telephone number of the petitioner, if the petitioner is not represented by an attorney or a qualified representative; the name, address, and telephone number of the petitioner’s representative, if any, which shall be the address for service purposes during the course of the proceeding; and an explanation of how the petitioner’s substantial interests will be affected by the agency determination; c) A statement of when and how the petitioner received notice of the agency decision; d) A statement of all disputed issues of material fact. If there are none, the Page 32 of 78 SLERP/CO 11/2022 petition must so indicate; e) A concise statement of the ultimate facts alleged, including the specific facts the petitioner contends warrant reversal or modification of the agency’s proposed action; f) A statement of the specific rules or statutes the petitioner contends require reversal or modification of the agency’s proposed action, including an explanation of how the alleged facts relate to the specific rules or statutes; and g) A statement of the relief sought by the petitioner, stating precisely the action petitioner wishes the agency to take with respect to the agency’s proposed action. If a petition is filed, the administrative hearing process is designed to formulate agency action. Accordingly, the Department's final action may be different from the position taken by it in this Notice. Persons whose substantial interests will be affected by any decision of the Department the subject Consent Order have the right to petition to become a party to the proceeding. The petition must conform to the requirements specified above and be filed (received) within 21 days of receipt of this notice in the Office of General Counsel at the above address of the Department. Failure to petition within the allowed time frame constitutes a waiver of any right such person has to request a hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes, and to participate as a party to this proceeding. Any subsequent intervention will only be at the approval of the presiding officer upon motion filed pursuant to Rule 28-106.205, Florida Administrative Code. A person whose substantial interests are affected by the Consent Order may file a timely petition for an administrative hearing under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes, or may choose to pursue mediation as an alternative remedy under Section 120.573, Florida Statutes, before the deadline for filing a petition. Choosing mediation will not adversely affect the right to a hearing if mediation does not result in a settlement. The procedures for pursuing mediation are set forth below. Page 33 of 78 SLERP/CO 11/2022 Mediation may only take place if the Department and all the parties to the proceeding agree that mediation is appropriate. A person may pursue mediation by reaching a mediation agreement with all parties to the proceeding (which include the Respondent, the Department, and any person who has filed a timely and sufficient petition for a hearing) and by showing how the substantial interests of each mediating party are affected by the Consent Order. The agreement must be filed in (received by) the Office of General Counsel of the Department at 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Mail Station 35, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000, or received via electronic correspondence at Agency_Clerk@floridadep.gov, within 10 days after the deadline as set forth above for the filing of a petition. The agreement to mediate must include the following: (a) The names, addresses, and telephone numbers of any persons who may attend the mediation; (b) The name, address, and telephone number of the mediator selected by the parties, or a provision for selecting a mediator within a specified time; (c) The agreed allocation of the costs and fees associated with the mediation; (d) The agreement of the parties on the confidentiality of discussions and documents introduced during mediation; (e) The date, time, and place of the first mediation session, or a deadline for holding the first session, if no mediator has yet been chosen; (f) The name of each party’s representative who shall have authority to settle or recommend settlement; and (g) Either an explanation of how the substantial interests of each mediating party will be affected by the action or proposed action addressed in this notice of intent or a statement clearly identifying the petition for hearing that each party has already filed and incorporating it by reference. (h) The signatures of all parties or their authorized representatives. As provided in Section 120.573, Florida Statutes, the timely agreement of all parties to mediate will toll the time limitations imposed by Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Page 34 of 78 SLERP/CO 11/2022 Florida Statutes, for requesting and holding an administrative hearing. Unless otherwise agreed by the parties, the mediation must be concluded within sixty days of the execution of the agreement. If mediation results in settlement of the administrative dispute, the Department must enter a final order incorporating the agreement of the parties. Persons whose substantial interests will be affected by such a modified final decision of the Department have a right to petition for a hearing only in accordance with the requirements for such petitions set forth above and must therefore file their petitions within 21 days of receipt of this notice. If mediation terminates without settlement of the dispute, the Department shall notify all parties in writing that the administrative hearing processes under Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes, remain available for disposition of the dispute, and the notice will specify the deadlines that then will apply for challenging the agency action and electing remedies under those two statutes. 24.The Department hereby expressly reserves the right to initiate appropriate legal action to prevent or prohibit any violations of applicable statues, or the rules promulgated thereunder that are not specifically addressed by the terms of this Consent Order. 25.The Department, for and in consideration of the complete and timely performance by Respondents of the obligations agreed to in this Consent Order, hereby waives its right to seek judicial imposition of damages or civil penalties for alleged violations addressed in this Consent Order. 26.Respondents acknowledge and waive its right to an administrative hearing pursuant to Sections 120.569 and 120.57, Florida Statutes, on the terms of this Consent Order. Respondents acknowledge its right to appeal the terms of this Consent Order pursuant to Section 120.68, Florida Statutes, and waives that right upon signing this Consent Order. 27.Electronic signatures or other versions of the parties’ signatures, such as .pdf or facsimile, shall be valid and have the same force and effect as originals. No Page 35 of 78 SLERP/CO 11/2022 modifications of the terms of this Consent Order shall be effective until reduced to writing and executed by both Respondents and the Department. 28. All submittals and payments required by this Consent Order to be submitted to the Department shall be sent to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, attn. Patricia Andrade, 3301 Gun Club Road MSC 7210-1, West Palm Beach, FL 33406, or by email at SED_Compliance@FloridaDEP.gov. 29. In the event of a sale or conveyance of the property, if all of the requirements of this Consent Order have not been fully satisfied, Respondents shall, at least 30 days prior to the sale or conveyance of the property, (1) notify the Department of such sale or conveyance and (2) provide a copy of this Consent Order with all attachments to the new owner. The sale or conveyance of the property shall not relieve the Respondent of the obligations imposed in this Consent Order. 30. This Consent Order is a settlement of the Department’s civil and administrative authority arising under Florida law to resolve the matters addressed herein. This Consent Order is not a settlement of any criminal liabilities which may arise under Florida law, nor is it a settlement of any violation which may be prosecuted criminally or civilly under federal law. 31. This Consent Order is a final order of the Department pursuant to Section 120.52(7), Florida Statutes, and it is final and effective on the date filed with the Clerk of the Department unless a Petition for Administrative Hearing is filed in accordance with Chapter 120, Florida Statutes. Upon the timely filing of a petition this Consent Order will not be effective until further order of the Department. Page 36 of 78 For 01-23-2024 23rd January 24 Palm Beach County Page 37 of 78 ATTACHMENT I RESTORATION ACTIONS OGC FILE NO. 23-1762 DEP VS. STORE CAPITAL ACQUISITIONS, LLC & ALTITUDE HOSPITALITY, LLC 1. Within 120 days of the effective date of this Order, Respondent Altitude Hospitality shall complete the following Restoration Actions: a. Fully implement the Mangrove Restoration and Monitoring Plan attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment IV. b. Notify the Department at least 48 hours prior to the commencement of work under these Restoration Actions. c. Prior to planting, restore the restoration area to the grade existing prior to the dredging or filling addressed in this Order, including restoring gullies and rills. All fill removed from the restoration area shall be placed in a self-contained upland location which will not discharge to waters of the state. During regrading, turbidity and erosion control measures shall be used to ensure that Florida Administrative Code Rule 62302 is not violated. d. Stake the boundaries of the Restoration Area depicted in “Attachment IV” for approval by the Department, prior to undertaking any restoration work required in these Restoration Actions. This staked line shall remain in place during all phases of restoration and no wetlands or waters of the state shall be disturbed or affected by restoration activities. e. Turbidity barriers such as staked hay bales, staked silt screen, floating turbidity curtains shall be installed no more than 5 feet from the waterward or downstream edge of the restoration area to control turbidity during all restoration activities. The turbidity barriers shall be maintained and shall remain in place until the restoration actions are completed and the turbidity is measured at less than 0 NTUs over background levels. Page 38 of 78 f. During and after regrading, stabilize all side slopes as soon as possible to prevent erosion, siltation, or turbid runoff into waters of the State, but, in any event, no later than 72 hours after attaining final grade. g. Any regrading or planting of the restoration area shall be conducted so as not to affect wetland areas outside the restoration area. h. Prior to planting but after any required regrading, remove all exotic and nuisance vegetation. Nuisance and exotic vegetation includes all species of vegetation listed on the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council’s 2019 List of Invasive Plant Species, attached hereto as “Attachment V”. i. All exotic vegetation shall be removed from the restoration area using handheld equipment in a manner that will minimize impacts to the existing wetland plants and will not cause ruts in the wetland soils which will impede or divert the flow of surface waters. j. The stumps of exotic plants previously removed shall be treated annually or as necessary to prevent regrowth, with an appropriate systemic herbicide approved by the Department in advance. k. Prior to planting, debris from earlier trimming and cutting shall be removed from the restoration area and placed in an upland location. 2. Within 30 days of completion of the above Restoration Actions, Respondent Altitude Hospitality shall submit the following information to the Department: a. Written notification that the Restoration Actions have been completed. b. Enough color photographs to show the entire completed restoration area taken from fixed reference points shown on a plan view drawing. c. Nursery receipts for all plants used in the Restoration Actions. d. Number and spacing of each species planted Page 39 of 78 ATTACHMENT II MAINTENANCE AND MONITORING ACTIONS OGC FILE NO. 23-1762 DEP VS. STORE CAPITAL ACQUISITIONS, LLC & ALTITUDE HOSPITALITY LLC Within 30 days of the completion of the Restoration Actions outlined in Attachment I, Respondent Altitude Hospitality shall implement the following Maintenance and Monitoring Actions: 1. For 5 years following completion of the Restoration Actions, inspect the restoration area quarterly for the first year and semi-annually thereafter. The purpose of the monitoring shall be to determine the success of the restoration. 2. "Success of the restoration" means that at the end of the monitoring schedule the following success criteria are met in each restoration area required in the Restoration Actions. At each inspection in the Monitoring Schedule, Respondent Altitude Hospitality shall replace enough dead plants to ensure that at least 80% percent of the original number of each species planted in the restoration area is alive. a. At least 80 percent have survived, and the survivors have achieved at least a 30 percent mean annual growth rate as measured by the statistically valid methods found in Daubenmire, R. (1968), Oosting (1956), or Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg (1974). b. The total contribution to percent cover by the nuisance and exotic vegetation listed on the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council’s (FLEPPC) 2019 List of Invasive Plant Species (Attachment V) is less than 10 percent. c. The restoration areas have been inspected by the Department and the Department has informed the Respondent Altitude Hospitality in writing that all the restoration areas are within the landward extent of waters of the state as defined in Florida Administrative Code Rule 62-340. 3. During each inspection, remove all nuisance and exotic vegetation listed in the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council’s 2019 List of Invasive Plant Species (Attachment V) without disturbing the other existing vegetation in the restoration area. Page 40 of 78 4. Within 30 days after the completion of each inspection in the monitoring schedule, complete a monitoring report and submit it to the Department. The monitoring reports shall include the following information: a. Date of the inspection. b. Color photographs taken from the same locations as the pictures taken in the Restoration Actions. c. Either an actual count or a statistically valid estimate* of the percentage of each species planted in the Restoration Actions that has survived compared to the total number of plants in the restoration areas. d. The number of each species replanted to reach the 80 percent survival rate. e. Description of any nuisance or exotic species removal. f. A plan view noting the locations of all replantings. g. Growth data for a statistically valid subsample* of trees including height, diameter at breast height, and mean annual growth rate. * Statistically valid estimating methods include those found in Daubenmire, R. (1968), Oosting (1956), or Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg (1974), or other method approved by the Department. More information on these methods will be provided by the Department upon request. 5. If after a period of two years of the five-year monitoring period from the original planting, the Restoration Area is not clearly trending towards meeting the success criteria, submit an Alternative Restoration Plan to the Department for approval and implementation, which shall be prepared by a professional qualified in mangrove restoration. 6. If the restoration area is not deemed successful after the last semi-annual monitoring event, continue to perform the Maintenance and Monitoring actions until the Department has informed Respondent Altitude Hospitality that the success criteria have been met, including the submittal and implementation of alternate planting plans if deemed necessary. Page 41 of 78 7. Any mangrove trimming performed during the monitoring period shall be done in accordance with the 1996 Mangrove Trimming and Preservation Act, be limited to the established exemption criteria, be performed by a Professional Mangrove Trimmer as applicable pursuant to the 1996 Mangrove Trimming and Preservation Act, and not include any area inside of the restoration area or include any of the restoration plantings. Page 42 of 78 ATTACHMENT III DECLARATION AND COVENANT OF MANGROVE REGULATION OGC FILE NO. 23-1762 DEP VS. STORE CAPITAL ACQUISITIONS, LLC & ALTITUDE HOSPITALITY, LLC THIS DECLARATION AND COVENANT OF MANGROVE REGULATION is entered into this day of 2023, by Store Capital Acquisitions, LLC, having an address at 8377 E. Hartford Dr., Ste. 100, Scottsdale, AZ, 85255 ("DECLARANT"), at the request of the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection, whose address is Department of Environmental Protection, 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 ("DEPARTMENT"). The term "DECLARANT" shall include the singular and the plural, and the heirs, successors and assigns of DECLARANT and all subsequent owners of the Property, and the provisions of this covenant shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the Department. The term "DEPARTMENT" shall include any successor or assignee of the DEPARTMENT. WITNESSETH WHEREAS, the DECLARANT is the sole owner in fee simple of certain lands situated in St Lucie County, Florida, more specifically described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein ("Property"); and WHEREAS, the DEPARTMENT finds that on or around April 2023 through May 2023, DECLARANT’s lessee Altitude Hospitality, or a contractor or agent on behalf of Altitude Hospitality, conducted activities on the Property, which are subject to the regulatory authority of the DEPARTMENT under Chapter 403 of the Florida Statutes, consisting of unauthorized alteration of Rhizophora mangle (red mangroves) and Avicennia germinans (black mangroves) (collectively referred to as "mangroves" unless otherwise specified) on the Property within the landward extent of the North Fork St. Lucie River Aquatic Preserve and within the landward extent of wetlands; and WHEREAS, prior to the unauthorized mangrove alteration, Areas A and B as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein, contained mangroves with an average height of at least 10 feet and 25 feet, respectively, as measured from substrate; and WHEREAS, DECLARANT’s lessee Altitude Hospitality, with DECLARANT’s approval, agrees to plant 2,780 mangroves on the Property as a requirement of the Consent Order, OGC File No. 23-1762; and WHEREAS, DECLARANT’s lessee Altitude Hospitality, with DECLARANT’s approval has agreed to restore the mangroves on the Property back to the historic configuration that existed prior to the unauthorized mangrove alteration. Page 43 of 78 SLERP/RAFF/0797.2 Declaration and Covenant of Mangrove Regulation OGC FILE No. 23-1762 DEP vs. Store Capital Acquisitions, LLC & Altitude Hospitality, LLC Page 2 of 8 NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the above and the mutual covenants, terms, conditions and restrictions contained herein, together with other good and valuable consideration, the adequacy and receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, DECLARANT hereby voluntarily grants and conveys to the DEPARTMENT this Declaration against the Property which shall run with the land and be binding upon the DECLARANT and shall remain in full force and effect until released pursuant to the terms herein. The scope, nature and character of this Declaration shall be as follows: 1. Purpose. The purpose of this Declaration is to impose mangrove trimming and alteration restrictions for the restoration of the pre-altered configuration of Rhizophora mangle (red mangroves) and Avicennia germinans (black mangroves) on the Property, within the landward extent of the North Fork St. Lucie River Aquatic Preserve and within the landward extent of wetlands, which existed prior to the April 2023 through May 2023 unauthorized mangrove alteration activities. The pre-altered configuration consisted of the following: (a) Area A as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein, contained mangroves with an average height of at least 10 feet, as measured from substrate, and (b) Area B as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein, contained mangroves with an average height of at least 25 feet, as measured from substrate (''Pre-altered Configuration"). This Pre-altered Configuration of mangroves on the Property shall be restored on the Property. 2. Mangrove Restoration. The DECLARANT shall authorize their lessee, Altitude Hospitality, to implement the planting and restoration of mangroves along the shoreline of the Property, within the landward extent of the North Fork St. Lucie River Aquatic Preserve and within the landward extent of wetlands, as further required by the Consent Order and the Mangrove Restoration and Monitoring Plan, attached hereto and incorporated herein as Attachment IV. 3. Mangrove Alteration or Trimming. There shall be no alteration, removal, or trimming of mangroves on DECLARANT'S Property, unless mangroves are located outside of the Restoration Area. All trimming and alteration of mangroves outside of the Restoration Area shall be done in accordance with Florida Statutes sections 403.9321 - 403.9333 ("Mangrove Trimming and Preservation Act"). The following conditions and restrictions to mangrove alteration or trimming shall apply: Page 44 of 78 SLERP/RAFF/0797.3 Declaration and Covenant of Mangrove Regulation OGC FILE No. 23-1762 DEP vs. Store Capital Acquisitions, LLC & Altitude Hospitality, LLC Page 3 of 8 a. At such time as the mangroves in Area A as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein, reach an average height of at least 10 feet as measured from the substrate, trimming may occur in accordance with Florida Statutes sections 403.9321 - 403.9333 ("Mangrove Trimming and Preservation Act"). b. At such time as the mangroves in Area B as depicted in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated herein, reach an average height of at least 25 feet as measured from the substrate, trimming may occur in accordance with Florida Statutes sections 403.9321 - 403.9333 ("Mangrove Trimming and Preservation Act"). c. All mangrove trimming activities shall be conducted in a manner that does not defoliate, destroy mangroves, or otherwise alter mangroves. d. The prop roots of any Rhizophora mangle (red mangrove) shall not be trimmed. 4. Reserved Rights. DECLARANT reserves to itself all rights as owner of the Property, including the right to engage in uses of the Property that are not prohibited herein, which are not inconsistent with any DEPARTMENT rule, criteria, permit, and the intent and purposes of this Declaration. 5. Enforcement Discretion. The DEPARTMENT is given the right to enforce this Declaration by injunction or proceed at law or in equity to enforce the provisions and the purpose of this Declaration and covenants set forth herein, to prevent the occurrence of any of the prohibited activities hereinafter set forth, and the right to require DECLARANT to restore and mitigate for any unauthorized mangrove alteration or trimming, subsequent to the date of execution of this Declaration, in contravention of the covenants established herein. Enforcement of the terms, provisions and restrictions of this Declaration shall be at the sole discretion of the DEPARTMENT, and any forbearance on behalf of the DEPARTMENT to exercise its rights hereunder in the event of any breach by DECLARANT, shall not be deemed or construed to be a waiver of the DEPARTMENT'S rights. For the purpose of monitoring the covenants and restrictions contained in this Declaration, the DEPARTMENT is granted the right of entry upon the Property in a reasonable manner and upon reasonable notice to the DECLARANT. The DEPARTMENT agrees that notwithstanding any future delegation to a local government pursuant to Section 403.9324, Florida Statutes, that DEPARTMENT shall retain exclusive authority to enforce the terms of this Declaration. 6. Enforcement Costs. If the DEPARTMENT prevails in an enforcement action over the violation of the terms and conditions of this Declaration, it shall be entitled to recover costs, including expert witness fees, as well as the reasonable cost of restoring the Page 45 of 78 SLERP/RAFF/0797.4 Declaration and Covenant of Mangrove Regulation OGC FILE No. 23-1762 DEP vs. Store Capital Acquisitions, LLC & Altitude Hospitality, LLC Page 4 of 8 mangroves to the Pre-altered Configuration. These remedies are in addition to any other remedy, fine or penalty which may be applicable under Chapters 373 and 403, Florida Statutes, or at law or in equity. 7. Recording in Land Records. DECLARANT agrees to record this Declaration and any amendments hereto in the official land records of St Lucie County, Florida. DECLARANT shall pay all recording costs and taxes necessary to record this Declaration in the public records. Upon recordation of this Declaration and any subsequent amendments, DECLARANT shall submit to the DEPARTMENT a copy of the recorded instrument evidencing the recordation date and book and page number of the official land records of St Lucie County, Florida. 8. Successors. The covenants, terms, conditions and restrictions of this Declaration shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of the parties hereto, DECLARANT'S respective personal representatives, heirs, successors and shall continue as a servitude running in perpetuity with the Property. 9. Notices. All notices, consents, approvals or other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed properly given if sent by United States certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to the appropriate party or successor-in-interest. 10. Subsequent Deeds. In order to ensure the perpetual nature of the covenants and restrictions contained in this Declaration, in any subsequent deed or other legal instrument by which DECLARANT divests itself of any interest in the Property, DECLARANT shall reference this Declaration and any amendments hereto, along with the book and page numbers of the official land records of St Lucie County, Florida, where this Declaration and any amendments are recorded, as required by paragraph 7 of this Declaration. DECLARANT further agrees to give written notice to DEPARTMENT of the transfer of any interest at least thirty 30 days prior to the date of such transfer. The failure of Grantor to perform any act required by this paragraph shall not impair the validity of this Declaration or limit its enforceability in any way. 11. Severability. If any provision of this Declaration or the application thereof to any person or circumstances is found to be invalid, the remainder of the provisions of this Declaration shall not be affected thereby, as long as the purpose of the Declaration is preserved. 12. Release of Declaration. The purpose of the Declaration is to impose mangrove trimming and alteration restrictions for the restoration of the height and configuration of the mangroves on the Property that existed prior to the April 2023 through May 2023 Page 46 of 78 SLERP/RAFF/0797.5 Declaration and Covenant of Mangrove Regulation OGC FILE No. 23-1762 DEP vs. Store Capital Acquisitions, LLC & Altitude Hospitality, LLC Page 5 of 8 unauthorized trimming and alteration activities. Upon completion of all success criteria DECLARANT may request the Department release the Declaration, and the Department shall release the Declaration, when the mangroves within the Restoration Area shall be allowed to grow to the following minimum heights before requesting release of the Declaration: a)Area A as depicted in Exhibit B of this Order shall reach an average of at least 10 feet as measured from substrate. b)Area B as depicted in Exhibit B of this Order shall reach an average of at least 25 feet as measured from substrate. 13.Alteration or Revocation. This Declaration may be amended or modified only by written agreement between the parties hereto. Further, this Declaration may be released, in whole or in part, by the DEPARTMENT at any time and upon prior notice. Any amendment, modification, release, or termination of the Declaration shall be filed in the public records of St Lucie County. 14.Controlling Law. The interpretation and performance of this Declaration shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD unto the DEPARTMENT forever. The covenants, terms, conditions, restrictions and purpose imposed with this Declaration shall be binding upon DECLARANT and shall continue as a servitude running in perpetuity with the Property. DECLARANT hereby covenants and represents with said DEPARTMENT that DECLARANT is lawfully seized of said Property in fee simple; that the Property is free and clear of all encumbrances that could impair GRANTOR'S rights to impose the restrictive covenants imposed in this Declaration, all mortgages have been joined or subordinated; and that DECLARANT has good right and lawful authority to create, establish, and impose this Declaration. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the DECLARANT has executed this Declaration on the day and year first above written. Page 47 of 78 SLERP/RAFF/0797.6 Declaration and Covenant of Mangrove Regulation OGC FILE No. 23-1762 DEP vs. Store Capital Acquisitions, LLC & Altitude Hospitality, LLC Page 6 of 8 Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence as witnesses: Signature of Witness Chad Freed, Manager, Executive Vice President and General Counsel Printed/Typed Name Signature of Witness Printed/Typed Name STATE OF ARIZONA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 20 , by Chad Freed. They are personally known to me or each produced as identification. (SEAL) Notary Public Signature Printed/Typed Name of Notary Commission No. Commission Expires Store Capital Acquisitions, LLC a Foreign Limited Liability Co. Page 48 of 78 11/9/23, 12:12 PM (https://paslc.gov/) Saint Lucie County Property Appraiser Michelle Franklin CFA Declaration and Covenant of Mangrove Regulation OGC FILE No. 23-1762 DEP vs. Store Capital Acquisitions, LLC & Altitude Hospitality, LLC Page 7 of 8 Click here for Legal Disclaimer https://www.paslc.gov/map/ EXHIBIT A Page 49 of 78 EXHIBIT B Declaration and Covenant of Mangrove Regulation OGC FILE No. 23-1762 DEP vs. Store Capital Acquisitions, LLC & Altitude Hospitality, LLC Page 8 of 8 4423-210-0001-000-3 * Not a survey Cadastral 2020 (Property Appraiser Parcels) - Public AREA A (10-15 ft. tall) AREA B (> 25ft. tall) TOTAL AREA ~ 17, 789 SQ. FT 0 62.5 125 Feet ¯Created by FDEP 11/7/2023 Page 50 of 78 Mangrove Restoration and Monitoring Plan Sandpiper Bay Resort 4500 SE Pine Valley Street Port St. Lucie, FL 34952 Prepared by CoxPinson Environmental, LLC for WL23-0095ERP56SED October 12, 2023 Page 51 of 78 1 Background On May 30, 2023, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) sent Warning Letter Number WL23-0095ERP56SED to Store Capital Acquisitions, LLC notifying them of the results of an inspection conducted by FDEP staff concerning compliance with the State of Florida’s Rules contained in Chapters 403 and 373 Florida Statutes (F.S.) at their property located at 4500 SE Pine Valley Street, Port St. Lucie, Florida (the “Property”). This plan was prepared by CoxPinson Environmental on behalf of Store Capital Acquisitions (the “Client”) to complete the follow-up corrective actions as stated in the Warning Letter, ERP Inspection Report dated May 31st 2023, and as discussed with FDEP. On June 22, 2023, we attended a meeting at the Southeast District FDEP office to discuss the Warning Letter. At this meeting, FDEP presented an ERP Inspection Report dated May 31st 2023 (the “Follow-up Inspection Report) that includes additional mangrove impacts at the Property by way of filling over remnant mangrove roots and propagules, lack of sedimentation control measures, and resulting fill material discharge into the North Fork St. Lucie River Aquatic Preserve. This Follow-up Inspection Report also includes follow-up corrective actions to be addressed. On the property, any mangrove trimming/alteration has long since ceased. The follow-up corrective actions as stated in the Warning Letter are: Enter into a Consent Order with FDEP which will provide timeframes to complete corrective actions, including but not limited to replanting and monitoring mangroves within the mangrove fringe, purchasing of temporal loss mitigation and payment of penalties and department costs. The Follow up Inspection Report requires: Installation and maintenance of erosion and sedimentation control measures to avoid further impacts to wetlands and other surface waters. Enter a Consent Order with the FDEP which will provide timeframes to complete corrective actions, including but not limited to: Restoration of impacted areas, Mitigation for temporal loss of function, and Assessment of civil penalties and department costs and expenses. On the property, all mangrove trimming or alteration has ceased. Sedimentation control measures to avoid further impacts to wetlands or other surface waters were deployed on August 4th 2023. In subsequent discussions between FDEP and CoxPinson Environmental (“Consultant”) FDEP asked that a Mangrove Restoration and Mitigation Plan be developed prior to having the Client enter a Consent Order with the State. A mitigation plan including credit purchase information and a required UMAM or WRAP analysis will follow this restoration plan. The Consultant is responsible for reserving saltwater credits to purchase from a mitigation bank or provide mitigation through public interest projects. David Cox, Ph.D., a principal with Cox Pinson Environmental, LLC and a Professional Mangrove Trimmer (PMT) approved by the State, has investigated the site and developed this Mangrove Restoration (the “Restoration Plan”) after meeting on site with FDEP Aquatic Preserve staff and MANG, Mangrove Restoration Specialists. This proposed Restoration Plan was developed from this meeting, after having surveyed the site, and consulting with FDEP staff to secure guidance. Page 52 of 78 2 The goal of the Restoration Plan is to implement a successful restoration project with a focus on replacing the functional values of the Mangrove community. General Setting The Property is within the North Fork St. Lucie Aquatic Preserve (North Fork St. Lucie River Aquatic Preserve Management Plan) and Outstanding Florida Waters, Class III Waters of the State (Figure 1). It is a 96.46 acre parcel and includes a resort undergoing significant remodeling since it’s infrastructure is aged. It is located within Township 37S, Range 40E, Section 23. The portions of the property which is the subject of this Restoration Plan are located on the southeast portion of the parcel (Figure 2). Per the Warning Letter, FDEP had "received a complaint via e-mail stating that mangroves were cut down along the eastern shoreline of the resort.” FDEP staff visited the property to document the mangrove impacts on this same day, May 8th 2023. Current Condition The Warning Letter approximated the area of unauthorized mangrove impacts to be 17,789 sq. ft. or 0.40 acres. The unauthorized mangrove impacts of 17,789 sq. ft. is based on an approximation of the mangrove canopy impacted (Figure 3). FDEP stated during follow-up communications that they used aerial photos and measurements of mangrove stumps to approximate the canopy area. A mangrove fringe had previously been present along the shoreline consisting mostly of intertidal red mangroves (Rhizophora mangle) and few black mangroves (Avincennia germinans). The Follow up Inspection Report dated May 31st 2023, includes additional mangrove impacts by way of filling over remnant mangrove roots and propagules. The impact area to other surface waters (OSW) is a total of 430 sq. ft. The impact area to mangroves and wetlands is a total of 3,542 sq. ft. (Figure 4). The area of unauthorized impacts stated in this report is ~3,972 sq. ft. Total area of mangrove impact as stated in both the Warning Letter and Follow up Inspection Report is 21,331 sq. ft. or 0.49 acres. Total area of OSW impact as stated in the Follow up Inspection Report is 430 sq. ft. Currently, the impacted shoreline shows notable signs of natural mangrove recruitment and regrowth amongst the existing mangrove roots. Throughout the shoreline, the mangroves that were previously growing, occurred in patches with irregular density. Photo 2 shows evidence of areas with low density roots and bare, exposed sand. Photo 3 shows the evidence on site of areas Page 53 of 78 3 with a high density of existing mangrove roots. The existing mangrove roots that have been impacted will be kept in place. Recommended Restoration Mangroves will be replanted with varying sizes of mangrove specimens and unique planting techniques in two phases. No debris and minimal invasive plants have been found in the proposed Restoration Areas. As noted above, current mangrove roots on site will be kept in place. Elevations within the Restoration Area appear to be conducive to mangrove growth as evidenced by the density of naturally occurring propagules. Restoration is recommended to consist in three steps: Step 1 – Plantings Varying sizes of mangrove specimens and unique planting techniques will be used and occur in two phases to accommodate the shoreline challenges. A total of 2,780 mangroves will be planted in two phases. 1)Phase 1 areas with exposed sand along the shoreline. Exposed sandy areas will be replanted in Phase 1. MANG has advised exposed sandy areas to be the most ideal for restoration and the optimal planting area for long-termsuccess. •Thirty 7-gallon red mangroves will be planted to recover the lost canopy. These new canopies will begin at a height of five to seven feet. •Surrounding the larger 7-gallon mangroves, 250 3-gallon red mangroves with 3-4feet starting height will be planted. •The total area of exposed sandy area to replant is 2,918.25 sq. ft (Figure 5, 6). •The final phase of large mangrove planting includes 500 1-gallon mangroves spanning 2.5-4 feet in height. •The 1-gallon mangroves will encompass a mix of Red, White, and Black mangroves, creating natural transition zones and expanding the overall restorable square footage of the site. This tiered planting approach expedites canopyformation, stabilizing soil and promoting sediment accretion. Spacing for Phase 1will be 2ft on center (Figure 6). 2)Phase 2 areas with existing mangrove roots, riprap and newly planted mangroves along the shoreline (Figures 7,8,9).Phase 2 focuses on harder to plant areas. Page 54 of 78 4 •2,000 mature seedling red mangroves will be planted in these areas. •The total area to be replanted amongst existing mangrove roots and riprap is8,567.10 sq. ft. (Figure 7,8). •These seedlings will fill in the gaps identified between the existing mangrove roots, newly planted mangroves and rip rap when applicable. The terminal heightof the seedlings will be 2 feet in height or greater. •These seedlings have undergone an extended nurturing period to ensure robustterminal growth and enhanced strength. This specialized strategy leveragesexisting roots for structural reinforcement. Spacing for Phase 2 will be 1-1.5 feet on center. Precise planting locations may be field adjusted if sub-surface conditions present challenges. To the extent feasible, restoration, planting and monitoring work will be performed during periods of low tide. Plantings of well-rooted, nursery grown stock will be performed by MANG who is familiar with mangrove planting techniques within the timeframe detailed in the Consent Order. If the restoration area is not deemed successful after the yearly monitoring event specified in the Consent Order, additional supplemental planting plans will be provided. To further hasten restoration, it is recommended that red mangrove propagules and black and white mangrove seeds/seedlings that may naturally recruit into the area be allowed to naturally re-populate the area. Step 2 – Documenting Restoration and Future Mangrove Growth In order to gauge the degree of success of the mangrove restoration project, it is recommended that baseline conditions be documented immediately following the plantings. The following data will be collected: •The date of inspection. •Fixed location camera-stations will be used to provide photo evidence showingconditions. GPS coordinates will be recorded at the location of the field-located fixed camera-stations, from which photos will be taken during each monitoring session and included in the Time Zero and each following report. •The number, height and condition of each of the 27 polygons (Figure 5) of all mangroves planted in the restoration areas will be recorded. If mangrove plantings are found to not have survived, this will be noted. •Estimates will be made of the percent cover of mangroves. •Description of any exotic non-native species removal. Records will be kept of fauna observed in and adjacent to the site during the planting and monitoring events. Page 55 of 78 5 Non-native exotic plants will be removed from the restoration areas with only hand-held equipment. A report describing the results of the baseline (i.e., time zero) monitoring and including photos taken from the photo stations and survival rates of the mangrove plantings will be provided. This approach for documentation of mangrove restoration is based on previous requirements by FDEP’s Southeast District. Step 3 – Schedule for Maintenance and Monitoring Plan Implementation. Plantings and the collection of Time Zero (i.e., baseline) field data will be collected per FDEP guidance or within 30 days following execution of a Consent Order. The report detailing the plantings and the results of the collection of baseline data will be provided to FDEP within 14 days after the plantings and collection of the Time Zero field data. Subsequent monitoring, maintenance and reporting will be conducted as follows: For five years following completion of the Restoration Actions and the Time Zero report, the Respondents shall inspect the restoration quarterly for the first year and annually for years two through five. The purpose of this monitoring is to document the health of each mangrove planted within the Restoration Area, to document any new mangrove growth (i.e., mangrove saplings, new mangrove recruits), and determine the success of the restoration. At each inspection in the Monitoring Schedule, the Respondents shall replace enough dead plants to ensure that at least 80 percent of the original number of each species planted in the restoration areas is alive. The project will be deemed successful when the percent survival of planted mangroves is 80% or higher or the percent cover of mangroves reaches 80% or higher. Plant species designated by the State of Florida as Category I or Category II invasives that may become established within the restoration area will be removed during the initial planting and during each successive monitoring event using the least-impactful technique. The use of herbicides in the aquatic environment will be prohibited. Page 56 of 78 6 Summary Implementation of this Restoration, and Monitoring Plan is expected to restore the area to a mangrove dominated shoreline, where it will provide the multiple functions of providing intertidal and sub-tidal habitat for aquatic organisms, protecting the shoreline from erosion and filtration of upland runoff. Total area of mangrove impact as stated in both the Warning Letter and Follow up Inspection Report add to 21,331 sq. ft. or 0.49 acres. This area was estimated by FDEP based on mangrove canopy lost and used aerial images to finalize the area impacted. In Figure 6, please see how the areas we are restoring compare to the FDEP determined mangrove canopy lost. Total restoration area proposed is 11,485.35 sq. ft. which includes both the bare sand areas and the area amongst existing mangrove roots, riprap, and space between the large 1, 3, and 7-gallon plantings. 2,780 mangroves are proposed to be replanted in this plan. Page 57 of 78 7 Appendix: Figure 1: Location Map Figure 2: Consultant Mapped Mangrove Damage and Potential Restoration Area Figure 3: Warning Letter Map Figure 4: May 31st Follow Up Inspection Report Map Figure 5: Consultant Mapped Replanting Areas with Total Areas Labeled Figure 6: Phase 1 Replanting Plan Map Figure 7: Phase 2 Replanting Plan Map Figure 8: Phase 2 Replanting Plan Map Figure 9: Phase 2 Replanting Plan Map Figure 10: Restoration Area and FDEP Mangrove Canopy Area Map Photo 1: Bare Sand Planting Area Photo 2: Planting Area with Existing Mangrove Roots Page 58 of 78 Figure 1: Location Map Sandpiper Bay Resort 4500 SE Pine Valley Street Port Saint Lucie, FL 34952 S U S H W Y 1 In t e r s t a t e 9 5 4500 SE Pine Valley Street Page 59 of 78 Figure 2: Mangrove Damage and Potential Restoration Area Map Sandpiper Bay Resort Data Collected: July 7, 2023 These data were collected with ArcGIS Field Maps and a Trimble Catalyst reciever with sub-meter accuracy. Page 60 of 78 Service Layer Credits: World Boundaries and Places: Esri, HERE, Garmin, iPC 4423-210-0001-000-3 Cadastral 2020 (Property Appraiser Parcels) - Public View CONSERVATION AREA (10-15 ft. tall) CONSERVATION AREA (> 25ft. tall) MANGROVE IMPCAT MAP SANDPIPER / MANGROVES Site No.: 435405; Project No.:410938 ¯0 12562.5 Feet * Not a survey Created by FDEP 05/24/2023 TOTAL CONSERVATION AREA ~ 17, 789 SQ. FT Page 61 of 78 Service Layer Credits: World Boundaries and Places: Esri, HERE, Garmin, iPC MANGROVE/WETLAND/OSW IMPACT MAP Mangrove/Wetland Impacts (~3,542 sq. ft) OSW Impacts (~430 sq. ft) SANDPIPER BAY RESORT Site No.: 435405; Project No.: 410938 ¯0 5025 Feet * Not a survey Created by FDEP 6/9/2023 Page 62 of 78 Sandpiper Bay Resort 4500 SE Pine Valley Street Port Saint Lucie, FL 34952 668.88 sq. ft. 490.32 sq. ft. 96.12 sq. ft. 227.25 sq. ft. 84.87 sq. ft. 614.52 sq. ft. 681.84 sq. ft. 54.45 sq. ft. 922.86 sq. ft. 151.02 sq. ft. 307.62 sq. ft. 2,673 . 0 s q . f t . 752.85 sq. ft. 13.32 sq. ft. 17.19 sq. ft. 428.31 sq. ft. 52.74 sq. ft. 566.01 sq. ft. 883.62 sq. ft. 213.03 sq. ft. 633.78 sq. ft. 146.07 sq. ft. 350.73 sq. ft. 35.10 sq. ft. 3.96 sq. ft. 272.61 sq. ft. 143.37 sq. ft. Purple Area contains areas with riprap and dead mangrove roots Total Area= 8,567.10 sq. ft. Blue Area contains areas with bare sand Total Area= 2,918.25 sq. ft. Figure 5: Consultant Mapped Replanting Areas with Total Areas Labeled Page 63 of 78 Sandpiper Bay Resort 4500 SE Pine Valley Street Port Saint Lucie, FL 34952 Blue Area contains areas with bare sand Total Area= 2,918.25 sq. ft. Zoomed In: Proposed Mangrove Planting Area = 2,918.25 sq. ft. 7 gal 7 gal 7 gal 7 gal 7 gal 3 gal 3 gal 3 gal 3 gal 3 gal 3 gal 3 gal 3 gal 3 gal 3 gal 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Water Figure 6: Phase 1 Replanting Plan Map 2’ O.C. Page 64 of 78 Sandpiper Bay Resort 4500 SE Pine Valley Street Port Saint Lucie, FL 34952 Figure 7: Phase 2 Replanting Plan Map Amongst Existing Roots Replanting with mature, 2 ft. tall, Red mangrove seedlings amongst existing roots. One to one and a half feet on center. Page 65 of 78 Sandpiper Bay Resort 4500 SE Pine Valley Street Port Saint Lucie, FL 34952 Figure 8: Phase 2 Replanting Plan Map Amongst Riprap Replanting with mature, 2 ft. tall, Red mangrove seedlings amongst existing riprap. One to one and a half feet on center. Page 66 of 78 Sandpiper Bay Resort 4500 SE Pine Valley Street Port Saint Lucie, FL 34952 7 gal 7 gal 7 gal 7 gal 7 gal 3 gal 3 gal 3 gal 3 gal 3 gal 3 gal 3 gal 3 gal 3 gal 3 gal 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 Water Figure 9: Phase 2 Replanting Plan Map Amongst New Plantings Replanting with mature, 2 ft. tall, Red mangrove seedlings amongst the newly planted mangroves along the shoreline. One to one and a half feet on center. Page 67 of 78 Sandpiper Bay Resort 4500 SE Pine Valley Street Port Saint Lucie, FL 34952 Purple Area contains areas with riprap and dead mangrove roots Total Area= 8,567.10 sq. ft. Figure 10: Restoration Area & FDEP Mangrove Canopy Area Map Page 68 of 78 Page 69 of 78 Page 70 of 78 The 2019 list was prepared by the FLEPPC Plant List Committee Tony Pernas, Co-Chair, 2017-2019, National Park Service, Big Cypress National Preserve, tony_pernas@nps.gov Dennis Giardina, Co-Chair, 2017-2019, Florida Fish and Wild- life Conservation Commission, dennis.giardina@myfwc.com Janice Duquesnel, Florida Park Service, Florida Department of Environmental Protection, janice.duquesnel@dep.state.fl.us Alan Franck, Florida International University, Department of Biological Sciences, afranck@fiu.edu Roger L. Hammer, Retired Naturalist and Author, kaskazi44@comcast.net John Kunzer, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, john.kunzer@myfwc.com James Lange, Fairchild Tropical Botanic Garden, jlange@fairchildgarden.org Kenneth Langeland, Professor Emeritus, University of Florida/IFAS, Agronomy Department, gator8@ufl.edu Deah Lieurance, University of Florida/IFAS, Agronomy Department, dmlieurance@ufl.edu Chris Lockhart, Habitats Specialists Inc., chris@lockharts.org Jean McCollom, Natural Ecosystems, jeanm@naples.net Gil Nelson, Professor Emeritus, Florida State University/ iDigBio, gilnelson@bio.fsu.edu Jennifer Possley, Fairchild Topical Botanic Garden, jpossley@fairchildgarden.org Jimi L. Sadle, National Park Service, Everglades National Park, jimi_sadle@nps.gov Dexter Sowell, Florida State University, FNAI, dsowell@fnai.fsu.edu Jessica Spencer, US Army Corps of Engineers, jessica.e.spencer@usace.army.mil Arthur Stiles, Florida Park Service, arthur.stiles@dep.state.fl.us Richard P. Wunderlin, Professor Emeritus, University of South Florida, rwunder@usf.edu FLEPPC List Definitions: Exotic—a species introduced to Florida, purpose- fully or accidentally, from a natural range outside of Florida. Native—a species whose natural range includes Florida. Naturalized exotic—an exotic that sustains itself outside cultivation (it is still exotic; it has not “become” native). Invasive exotic— an exotic that has not only naturalized, but is expanding on its own in Florida native plant communities. Zone: N = north, C = central, S = south, Referring to each species’ general distribution in regions of Florida (not its potential range in the state). Please refer to the map below. north central south Citation example: FLEPPC. 2019 List of Invasive Plant Species. Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council. Internet: www.fleppc.org Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council’s 2019 List of Invasive Plant Species The mission of the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council is to reduce the impacts of invasive plants in Florida through the exchange of scientific, educational, and technical information. Note: The FLEPPC List of Invasive Plant Species is not a regulatory list. Only those plants listed as Federal Noxious Weeds, Florida Noxious Weeds, Florida Prohibited Aquatic Plants, or in local ordinances are regulated by law. Purpose of the List To provide a list of plants determined by the Florida Exotic Pest Plant Council to be invasive in natural areas of Florida and routinely update the list based upon information of newly identified occurrences and changes in distribution over time. Also, to focus attention on: •The adverse effects exotic pest plants have on Florida’s biodiversity and native plant communities, •The habitat losses in natural areas from exotic pest plant infestations, •The impacts on endangered species via habitat loss and alteration, •The need for pest plant management, •The socio-economic impacts of these plants (e.g., increased wildfires or flooding in certain areas), •Changes in the severity of different pest plant infestations over time, •Providing information to help managers set priorities for research and control programs. www.fleppc.org For more information on invasive exotic plants including links to related web pages, visit: www.fleppc.org "Attachment V" Page 71 of 78 CATEGORY I Invasive exotics that are altering native plant communities by displacing native species, changing community structures or ecological functions, or hybridizing with natives. This definition does not rely on the economic severity or geographic range of the problem, but on the documented ecological damage caused. Scientific Name Abrus precatorius Acacia auriculiformis Albizia julibrissin Albizia lebbeck Ardisia crenata Ardisia elliptica Asparagus aethiopicus Bauhinia variegata Bischofia javanica Calophyllum antillanum Casuarina equisetifolia Casuarina glauca Cenchrus purpureus (Pennisetum purpureum) Cinnamomum camphora Colocasia esculenta Colubrina asiatica Cupaniopsis anacardioides Deparia petersenii Dioscorea alata Dioscorea bulbifera Dolichandra unguis-cati (Macfadyena unguis-cati) Eichhornia crassipes Eugenia uniflora Ficus microcarpa1 Hydrilla verticillata Hygrophila polysperma Hymenachne amplexicaulis Imperata cylindrica Ipomoea aquatica Jasminum dichotomum Jasminum fluminense Lantana strigocamara2 Ligustrum lucidum Ligustrum sinense Lonicera japonica Ludwigia peruviana Lumnitzera racemosa Luziola subintegra Lygodium japonicum Lygodium microphyllum Manilkara zapota Melaleuca quinquenervia Common Name rosary pea earleaf acacia mimosa, silk tree woman's tongue coral ardisia shoebutton ardisia asparagus fern orchid tree bishopwood Santa Maria Australian-pine suckering Australian-pine elephantgrass, Napier grass camphor-tree wild taro latherleaf carrotwood Japanese false spleenwort winged yam air potato cat's-claw vine water-hyacinth Surinam cherry laurel fig hydrilla green hygro West Indian marsh grass cogongrass water-spinach Gold Coast jasmine Brazilian Jasmine lantana, shrub verbena glossy privet Chinese privet Japanese honeysuckle Peruvian primrosewillow black mangrove Tropical American watergrass Japanese climbing fern Old World climbing fern sapodilla melaleuca, paper bark Zone C, S C, S N, C C, S N, C, S C, S N, C, S C, S C, S S N, C, S C, S N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S S C, S N, C N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S C, S C, S N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S C C, S C, S N, C, S N, C N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S S S N, C, S N, C, S S C, S Scientific Name Melinis repens Microsorum grossum4 Microstegium vimineum Mimosa pigra Nandina domestica Nephrolepis brownii Nephrolepis cordifolia Neyraudia reynaudiana Nymphoides cristata Paederia cruddasiana Paederia foetida Panicum repens Pistia stratiotes Psidium cattleianum Psidium guajava Pueraria montana var. lobata Rhodomyrtus tomentosa Ruellia simplex Salvinia minima Scaevola taccada Schefflera actinophylla Schinus terebinthifolia Scleria lacustris Scleria microcarpa* Senna pendula var. glabrata Solanum tampicense Solanum viarum Sporobolus jacquemontii Syngonium podophyllum Syzygium cumini Tectaria incisa Thelypteris opulenta Thespesia populnea Tradescantia fluminensis Tradescantia spathacea Triadica sebifera (Sapium sebiferum) Urena lobata Urochloa mutica Vitex rotundifolia Common Name Natalgrass serpent fern, wart fern Japanese stiltgrass catclaw mimosa heavenly bamboo, nandina Asian sword fern sword fern Burma reed crested floatingheart sewer vine skunk vine torpedograss water-lettuce stawberry guava guava kudzu downy rose-myrtle Mexican petunia water spangles beach naupaka, half-flower schefflera, umbrella tree Brazilian pepper Wright's nutrush tropical nutrush Christmas senna, climbing cassia wetland night shade tropical soda apple West Indian dropseed arrowhead vine Java plum incised halberd fern jeweled maidenhair fern seaside mahoe small-leaf spiderwort oyster plant Chinese tallow-tree Caesar's weed paragrass beach vitex Zone C, S S N C, S N, C C, S N, C, S S C, S S N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S C, S C, S N, C, S C, S N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S C, S N, C, S C, S C, S C, S C, S N, C, S C, S N, C, S C, S S S C, S N, C C, S N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S N Scientific Name Adenanthera pavonina Agave sisalana Alstonia macrophylla Alternanthera philoxeroides Antigonon leptopus Ardisia japonica Aristolochia elegans (Aristolochia littoralis) Asystasia gangetica Begonia cucullata Broussonetia papyrifera Bruguiera gymnorrhiza Callisia fragrans Casuarina cunninghamiana Cecropia palmata Cenchrus polystachios (Pennisetum polystachios) Cenchrus setaceus (Pennisetum setaceum) Cestrum diurnum Chamaedorea seifrizii Clematis terniflora Cocos nucifera Crassocephalum crepidioides Cryptostegia madagascariensis Cyperus involucratus Cyperus prolifer Dactyloctenium aegyptium Dalbergia sissoo Dalechampia scandens* Distimake tuberosus (Merremia tuberosa) Dracaena hyacinthoides (Sansevieria hyacinthoides) Elaeagnus pungens Elaeagnus umbellata Epipremnum pinnatum cv. ‘Aureum’ Eulophia graminea Ficus altissima Flacourtia indica Hemarthria altissima Heteropterys brachtiata Hyparrhenia rufa Ipomoea carnea subsp fistulosa Kalanchoe x houghtonii Kalanchoe pinnata Common Name red sandalwood sisal hemp devil tree alligatorweed coral vine Japanese ardisia calico flower Ganges primrose wax begonia paper mulberry large-leafed mangrove Inch plant river sheoak trumpet tree mission grass fountain grass day jessamine bamboo palm Japanese clematis coconut palm redflower ragleaf Madagascar rubbervine umbrella plant dwarf papyrus Durban crow's-foot grass Indian rosewood, sissoo spurge-creeper Spanish arbor vine, wood-rose bowstring hemp silverthorn, thorny olive autumn olive, silverberry pothos Chinese crown orchid council tree, false banyan governor's plum limpograss redwing jaragua shrub morning-glory mother of millions life plant Zone S C, S S N, C, S N, C, S N N, C, S C, S N, C, S N, C, S S C, S C, S S S S C, S S N, C S C, S C, S C, S C, S C, S C, S S C, S C, S N, C N C, S C, S S S C, S S N, C, S C, S N, C, S C, S Scientific Name Koelreuteria elegans subsp. formosana Landoltia punctata Leucaena leucocephala Limnophila sessiliflora Livistona chinensis Macroptilium lathyroides Melaleuca viminalis (Callistemon viminalis) Melia azedarach Melinis minutiflora Mikania micrantha Momordica charantia Murraya paniculata Myriophyllum spicatum Passiflora biflora Phoenix reclinata Phyllostachys aurea Pittosporum pentandrum Platycerium bifurcatum Praxelis clematidea Pteris vittata Ptychosperma elegans Richardia grandiflora Ricinus communis Rotala rotundifolia Ruellia blechum Sesbania punicea Sida planicaulis Solanum diphyllum Solanum torvum Spermacoce verticillata3 Sphagneticola trilobata Stachytarpheta cayennensis Syagrus romanzoffiana Syzygium jambos Talipariti tiliaceum Terminalia catappa Terminalia muelleri Tribulus cistoides Urochloa maxima (Panicum maximum) Vernicia fordii Vitex trifolia Washingtonia robusta Wisteria sinensis Xanthosoma sagittifolium Common Name flamegold tree spotted duckweed leadtree Asian marshweed Chinese fan palm wild bushbean bottlebrush Chinaberry molasses grass mile-a-minute vine balsam-apple orange-jessamine Eurasian water-milfoil twin-flowered passion vine Senegal date palm golden bamboo Taiwanese cheesewood staghorn fern praxelis Chinese brake, ladder brake solitary palm largeflower Mexican clover castorbean dwarf rotala, roundleaf toothcup green shrimp plant rattlebox mata-pasto twinleaf nightshade turkey berry shrubby false buttonweed wedelia nettle-leaf porterweed queen palm Malabar plum, rose-apple mahoe, sea hibiscus tropical-almond Australian–almond puncture vine, burr-nut Guineagrass tung-oil tree simple-leaf chastetree Washington fan palm Chinese wisteria malanga, elephant ear Zone C, S N, C, S N, C, S N,C, S C, S N, C, S C, S N, C, S C S S N, C, S S N, C, S S C, S N, C S S C N, C, S S N, C, S N, C, S S N, C, S N, C, S C, S N, C, S N, C, S C, S N, C, S S C, S N, C, S C, S C, S C, S N, C, S N, C, S N, C, S C, S C, S N, C N, C, S 1 Does not include Ficus microcarpa var. fuyuensis, which is sold as “green island ficus”. 2 Historically this non-native has been referred to as Lantana camara, a species not known to occur in Florida. 3 Does not include the native endemic Spermacoce neoterminalis. 4 Microsorum grossum has been previously misidentified as Microsorum scolopendria. * Added to the FLEPPC List of Invasive Species in 2019. Plant names are those published in the Atlas of Florida Plants (http://www.florida.plantatlas.usf.edu). For historical species nomenclature see “Guide to Vascular Plants of Florida Third Edition.” Wunderlin and Hansen, University of Florida Press. 2011. CATEGORY II Invasive exotics that have increased in abundance or frequency but have not yet altered Florida plant communities to the extent shown by Category 1 species. These species may become Category 1 if ecological damage is demonstrated. Page 72 of 78 ITEM NO. (ID # 2024-64383) DATE: 2/20/2024 AGENDA REQUEST TO: Mosquito Control District PRESENTED BY: Roger Jacobsen, Mosquito Control Director SUBMITTED BY: Mosquito Control SUBJECT: Mapvision Hardware Upgrade - Contract C16-05-262 - Second Amendment BACKGROUND: In 2016, St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District (SLCMD) began using Leading Edge's software known as MapVision, to monitor the departments' inventory, mosquito populations, impoundment data, workflow data and much more. On 12/5/2023, the Mosquito Control District Board approved the upgrade of the software, to the Gen 3 version, which will increase processing speed, improve ULV fog truck operations, provide more up-to-date satellite and map views, and will improvise overall report capabilities (Contract #C16-05-262 - First Amendment). Due to the software upgrade, the current hardware will also need to be upgraded. The total cost to upgrade the hardware is $59,926.50. In addition, St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District has a Software License Agreement in place with Leading Edge. The St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District has been paying for the Mapvision Software License Agreement and the Mapvision Annual Service and Support since the inception of the Software License Agreement #C16-05-262, dated 5/17/16. Due to the software upgrade, the Software License Agreement and the MapVision Annual Service and Support will increase from $10,520.00 to $16,000.00. PREVIOUS ACTION: On 12/5/2023, the Mosquito Control District Board approved the upgrade of the software to the Gen 3 version, which will increase processing speed, improve ULV fog truck operations, provide more up-to-date satellite and map views, and will improvise overall report capabilities (Contract #C16-05-262-First Amendment. FINANCIAL IMPACT: There are sufficient funds available in St. Lucie County Mosquito Control Reserves, Account #145-9910- 599300-910000 for the Hardware Upgrade and the increase to the Software License Agreement and the MapVision Annual Service and Support. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval of Contract C16-05-262 - Second Amendment, for the MapVsion Hardware upgrade, and the increase to the MapVsion Software License Agreement #C16-05-262, which includes the Software License Agreement and the MapVision Annual Service and Support. COMMISSION ACTION: Page 73 of 78 RESULT: MOVER: None SECONDER: None AYES: None NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Coordination/Signatures Date: February 06, 2024 Roger Jacobsen, Mosquito Control Director Date: February 09, 2024 Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney Date: February 13, 2024 Jason Davis, Deputy County Administrator I Page 74 of 78 St Lucie County -MapVision Gen 3 Pricing -Addendum #1 January 30,2024 The following table details the pricing for the ULV FC equipment and travel/installation.This pricing is valid through March 31,2024. 1/9/2024 Units Unit Retail Extended Retail 12 Vehicle Upgrades to MV G3 ULV FC LEA Flow Control MVE Module Complete 12 $3,778.11 $45,337.32 Stellar External Power Harness 12 $57.78 $693.36 LEA FC Serial USB Cable 1 $117.11 $117.11 USB to microSD adapter 1 $33.43 $33.43 16GB SD Card 1 $27.00 $27.00 Optional -ULV Switch Assembly 12 $182.25 $2,187.00 13th -1 ULV Vehicle New MV G3 Installation LEA FC GPS System Complete less pump controller 1 $4,512.78 $4,512.78 Orion Pump Control Box Complete -KIT 1 $1,414.14 $1,414.14 Orion Pump Box Complete 1 $739.80 $739.80 Orion Pump Control CAN Cable 1 $212.46 $212.46 Optional -ULV Switch Assembly 1 $182.25 $182.25 ULV FC App Training and Installation $4,469.85 Total ULV FC -All 13 Vehicles $59,926.50 January 2024 SLCMC -MapVision Gen3 &ULV FC Proposal Adendum #1 Page #1 Page 75 of 78 *ULV FC Equipment pricing is good through March 31,2024,and is subject to change if project specifications or costs for outsourced equipment and/or services change. Signatures I,______________________________________________________,agree to the above amendment and pricing as quoted in this document. Signed this ____day of ____________,2024 ___________________________________________ Authorized Representative/SLMCS Leading Edge Associates,Inc.agrees to the proposal and pricing amounts as quoted in this document. Signed this 30th day of January 2024 Authorized Representative of Leading Edge Associates,Inc. January 2024 SLCMC -MapVision Gen3 &ULV FC Proposal Adendum #1 Page #2 Page 76 of 78 St Lucie Co MCD - MapVision G3 Migration License & Support Amended Quotes 1/30/24 St Lucie County Mosquito Control Lauri Heistermann heistermannl@stlucieco.org 772-462-1698 Roger Jacobsen jacobsenr@stlucieco.org Terril Mincey minceyt@stlucieco.org 407-288-7618 Reference: 20231009-091158126 Quote created: October 9, 2023 Quote expires: March 31, 2024 Quote created by: Michael Reynolds VP & COO mreynolds@leateam.com +18282462111 Comments from Michael Reynolds Per request, we have separated the annual license and support from the MapVision Gen3 Migration proposal as SLMCD will remit from different accounts. Two (2) hours each month of programming modifications are included in the training, support, and maintenance agreement. Any monthly modifications exceeding the two-hour timeframe, including online and telephone support will be billed at $195.00 per hour. Maintenance programming hour time allocations expire monthly and are not rolled over or accrued to future months. The training, support, and maintenance agreement also includes all costs associated with website hosting for Internet and Intranet sites. Upon termination, LEA will no longer provide server access or hosting services, unless the Licensee enters into a separate hosting agreement. Products & Services Page 77 of 78 Item & Description SKU Quantity Unit Price Total MapVision Annual License and Technical Support 1 $16,000.00 $16,000.00 One-time subtotal $16,000.00 Total $16,000.00 Purchase terms MapVision Annual Service, Support, and Software license fee (payable after the Go Live date) Invoices due upon receipt Due annually Signature Signature Date Printed name Questions? Contact me Michael Reynolds VP & COO mreynolds@leateam.com +18282462111 Leading Edge 506 Fentress Blvd, Ste B Daytona Beach, FL 32114 US Page 78 of 78