The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About02.02.2021HISTORICAL COMMISSION AGENDA ST. LUCIE COUNTY Regular Meeting Tuesday, February 2, 2021 4:00 PM Planning and Development Services Department County Commission Chambers St. Lucie County Administration Building 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 BOARD MEMBERS Land Use Planning or Historic Preservation Planning KRISSTA KING Architecture MIKE MENARD Anthropology, Archaeology, History RICHARD MCAFOOS - CHAIR Layperson BETTY JO STARK Layperson MELANIE TREWYN - VICE-CHAIR Conservation/Curation MIKE MIDDLEBROOK Construction JUDY BIGLIN Mission Statement To provide service, infrastructure and leadership necessary to advance a safe and sustainable community, maintain a high quality of life, and protect the natural environment for all our citizens Page 1 of 36 Historical Commission Tuesday, February 2, 2021 4:00 PM 2 | Page GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES – Attached is the agenda, which will determine the order of business conducted at today’s Board meeting. REGULAR AGENDA – Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items, which the Commission will discuss individually, usually in the order listed on the agenda. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chair will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION – Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON‐AGENDA ITEMS – These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT – Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Comments may pertain to any matter related to the Board’s duties as the County’s governing body. General comments in support or opposition to candidates for public office are not pertinent to the Board’s duties. DECORUM – Please be respectful of others’ opinions. MEETINGS – All Board meetings are open to the public and are held quarterly on the third Tuesdays of month at 4 p.m. and on the Meetings are held in the Planning Conference Room in the Planning and Development Services Department at 2300 Virginia Ave., Fort Pierce, Fla. 34982. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 772‐462‐1777 or TDD 772‐462‐1428 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Page 2 of 36 Historical Commission Tuesday, February 2, 2021 4:00 PM 3 | Page 1.CALL TO ORDER 2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3.ROLL CALL 4.ANNOUNCEMENTS 5.PUBLIC COMMENT 6.MINUTES A.Approval of the October 13, 2020 Historical Committee Meeting. 7.ELECTION OF OFFICIALS 2021 A.Chair B.Board Vice‐Chair Person 8.ITEMS FOR ACTION / CONSIDERATION A.OLD BUSINESS B.NEW BUSINESS 1.Demolition Request Petitioned by Property Owner ‐ 1901 South 33rd Street, Fort Pierce, FL 2.Demolition Request Petitioned by Building Official ‐ 2083 W Midway Rd., Fort Pierce, FL 9.MEMBER MATTERS 10.DISCUSSION 11.ADJOURNMENT Page 3 of 36 HISTORICAL COMMISSION ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Regular Meeting October 13, 2020 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 04:09 PM by Chair McAfoos. 2. ROLL CALL Roll Call by Chair McAfoos. Present BOARD MEMBERS Chair Richard McAfoos, Vice-Chair Melanie Trewyn (virtual), Commission Member Judy Biglin, Commission Member Krissta King, Commission Member Mike Menard, Commission Member Betty Starke, Commission Member Mike Middlebrook STAFF County Attorney Heather Young (Remote), Assistant Manager Planning Kori Benton, Board Secretary Stephanie Guevara APPLICANT Ms. Georgia Wood 4696 Palomar Ave Fort Pierce, FL 34946-6413 PUBLIC Henry Duhart Excused None. 3. ANNOUNCEMENTS None. Pledge of Allegiance led by Chair McAfoos. Page 4 of 36 Historical Commission Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:00 PM 2 | P a g e 4. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 5. MINUTES A. Approval for the February 25, 2020 Meeting RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commission Member Betty Starke SECOND ER: Commission Member Krissta King AYES: Chair Richard McAfoos, Betty Starke, Mike Middlebrook, Melanie Trewyn, Mike Menard, Krissta King, Judy Biglin NAYS: None EXCUSE D: None Chair McAfoos requested Madame secretary explain to the Commission that the notebooks provided are public record and are collected at the end of every meeting. 6. ITEMS FOR ACTION / CONSIDERATION A . Demolition Request: Accessory Structure (Garage) at 5006 Citrus Avenue, Fort Pierce STAFF PRESENTATION Mr. Kori Benton, Assistant Manager of Planning Department made a presentation regarding the history of the accessory structure (garage) located at 5006 Citrus. The applicant requests the garage demolition be released. The property has been owned by the applicant since 1983. If a replacement is made staff recommends that a condition of reconstruction is to ensure it meets the design integrity of the home. COMMISSION DISCUSSION Chair McAfoos opened discussion to the Commission. Ms. Biglin inquired regarding reconstruction, relating to shed location and compliance of setbacks. Mr. Benton replied that the applicant would have to apply for a variance to rebuild at the same location or they may request historic designation of the parcel that would allow for replacement to embody the original development pattern. Mr. Menard inquired, if approved, would reconstruction extend to a new owner if property is sold. Mr. Benton replied the Commission has a few avenues for conditions of approval. A request to document photograph with dimension, design, and placement. The second request may be to Page 5 of 36 Historical Commission Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:00 PM 3 | P a g e encourage historical designation. Ms. Starke wanted to know regarding code enforcement complaints. Mr. Benton replied that they were regarding the overall condition of the garage. Ms. Starke followed up inquiring about the origination of the complaint whether by owner or neighbor. Mr. Benton believed it was most likely a neighbor. Ms. Trewyn inquired if the Commission can recommend historical designation. Mr. Benton replied that would be an encouragement of staff to designate the main structure a historical designation. Chair McAfoos inquired regarding the grants for the owner if they are at 100% or is there owner contribution. Mr. Benton replied that this would be assistance not a full grant. Mr. Middlebrook wanted to clarify that if nothing is imposed it would only be if the improvements are needed. Mr. Benton replied that it is only for improvements; however, an example of window replacement because of damage then it may be more costly to meet standards. Mr. Middlebrook also inquired regarding the assistance provided. Mr. Benton responded that they would get assistance. Ms. Biglin inquired regarding maintenance requirements. Mr. Benton replied that the code enforcement would normally identify this. Chair McAfoos wanted to clarify that if the window scenario is presented, the first to receive that notification is code enforcement. Mr. Benton replied that they are. Ms. King inquired with historical designation can the owner wants to update the structure with modern improvements. Mr. Benton replied that the ordinance states that staff evaluates it and the commission using safety, economic hardship and the secretary of interior standards handles on a case by case basis. APPLICANT PRESENTATION Ms. Woods gave an overview of the home. She stated interest in a future opportunity of historical designation. Her son would like to rebuild garage there in the future. COMMISSION DISCUSSION Ms. Biglin inquired if another metal shed would be added. Ms. Woods responded she would not and would be historically significant to the property. Ms. Starke inquired regarding salvaging the barn doors. Ms. Woods responded they would try to retain as much of the hardware as possible. Mr. Menard recommended to salvage siding that matches the house. Ms. Woods agreed. STAFF RECOMMENDATION If the demolition is approved staff recommends that it be conditioned upon thorough documentation of dimensions and original features. COMMISSION MOTION Ms. Trewyn made a motion to release it for demolition with the conditions. Mr. Menard seconded for discussion. Ms. Starke wanted to add that any rebuild/restoration of the structure meet historical significance of the home. Mr. McAfoos guided the Commission to move forward with the motion to release demolition and have discussion about the other concerns afterward. RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commission Member Melanie Trewyn SECOND ER: Commission Member Mike Menard AYES: Chair Richard McAfoos, Betty Starke, Mike Middlebrook, Melanie Trewyn, Mike Menard, Page 6 of 36 Historical Commission Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:00 PM 4 | P a g e Krissta King, Judy Biglin NAYS: None EXCUSE D: None Chair McAfoos inquired of Mr. Benton what staff recommends as per comments made by Commission members. Mr. Benton suggests having staff meet with the owner and family regarding historic designation for future presentation to the Commission. Ms. Trewyn clarified that no motion is required for the exploration of the historical designation. 7. MEMBER MATTERS A. Commission Matters: Set Final 2020 Meeting Date or Accept an exception due to COVID-19 via local Emergency Order STAFF PRESENTATION Mr. Benton stated that the local and Florida state of emergency exempts the Commission from the four meetings per year requirement. RECOMMENDED MOTION The recommended motion would be for the commission to accept local and state exemption to our meeting requirements due to COVID- 19. COMMISSION MOTION RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commission Member Betty Starke SECOND ER: Commission Member Judy Biglin AYES: Chair Richard McAfoos, Betty Starke, Mike Middlebrook, Melanie Trewyn, Mike Menard, Krissta King, Judy Biglin NAYS: None EXCUSE D: None 8. DISCUSSION Page 7 of 36 Historical Commission Tuesday, October 13, 2020 4:00 PM 5 | P a g e B. Discussion: Potential Historic Designation Incentives – Land Development Code Flexibility for Use & Design STAFF PRESENTATION Mr. Benton went over the incentives relating to Land Development Code flexibility for use and design of historically designated site(s). Mr. Benton provided examples of properties that would benefit from the code flexibility to encourage continued preservation, provide for a viable economic reuse of the property and to ensure more attention to code compliance not over hall the integrity of the site. COMMISSION DISCUSSION Ms. King supports the proposal to work with each site on a case by case basis. Mr. Benton explained that during the site presentation to the planning department the applicant would be notified of incentives for historic designation. To move forward there would be steps for staff to activate this proposal. Ms. King stated that this would ideally benefit the owner. Ms. Trewyn proposed to reconvene or a subcommittee to discuss this item. Chair McAfoos inquired regarding the proposed meeting format and whether it complies with Commission regulations. Ms. Young stated that would be an amendment to the historical commission ordinance for historical designation and can be by reconvene or subcommittee. Ms. Biglin requested more time to discuss and for public notice. Mr. Benton recommended creating a presentation of a proposal and designate subcommittee. Chair McAfoos inquired of the Commission which members would like to join the subcommittee. Ms. Trewyn expressed interest and excused herself at 5:25 pm to tutor. Ms. Starke, Ms. Biglin, and Ms. King all expressed interest for subcommittee. 9. ADJOURNMENT Chair McAfoos presented Ms. Guevara as the new Commission secretary. Meeting adjourn motion requested by Chair McAfoos. COMMISSION MOTION: RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commission Member Betty Starke SECOND ER: Construction Judy Biglin AYES: Chair Richard McAfoos, Betty Starke, Mike Middlebrook, Mike Menard, Krissta King, Judy Biglin NAYS: None EXCUSE D: Melanie Trewyn Meeting adjourned at 5:27 p.m. Page 8 of 36 Meeting Date February 2, 2021 Owner Alex Hensley 2108 S 33rd ST Fort Pierce, FL 34947 Historic Status Non-Designated Structure Eligible for Local Designation Applicant Request Demolish original wood frame structure. Request & Staff Recommendation Evaluate the historic signifi-cance and condition of the subject structure, and consid-er whether to pursue designa-tion as historic or release the request for demolition. Staff Kori Benton, AICP Historic Preservation Officer S t . L u c i e C o u n t y H i s t o r i c a l C o m m i s s i o n H i s t o r y c. 1928 Date of Home Construction per Florida Master Site File (8SL1793) c. 1950s/1970s Date of Alterations (Porch Enclosure / Window Replacement Request: The property owner and representative are seeking authorization to release demolition of the subject structure. S i t e O v e r v i e w Architectural Snapshot & Historical Significance: This structure displays a simple Florida vernacular architectural style that is commonly found throughout South Florida. The structure features an what appears to be an original metal roof or direct replacement, and exposed rafter tails. The structure has undergone non- historic alterations, particularly the enclosed front porch. Asbestos siding, and the some non-original window replacement is apparent. Significant vegetation growth surrounding the structure limits visibility from the adjacent rights-of-way, at a corner lot. Agenda Item 8.B. Location 1901 S 33rd Street Planning and Development Services Department Historic Preservation 1901 S. 33rd Street —Primary Structure Zoning RM-5, Residential Medium Representative Daniel Marin Alpha Design Contractors Parcel ID 2417-702-0048-000-9 Subject Site 33 r d S t r e e t Fairlawn School Page 9 of 36 2 Photos: c2012-2018 Previous Site Photo (2006) More Recent Photos Page 10 of 36 3 S t a f f R e c o m m e n d a t i o n Staff recommends the Commission evaluate the historic significance and current condition of the subject structure, and consider whether to pursue designation of the structure as historic or release the request for demolition. If the demolition is released, staff requests the action be conditioned upon thorough documentation of the structure’s loca- tion and design—via photographs. Attachments Florida Master Site File Demolition Request Highlights Is the structure of such interest or quality that it would reasonably meet national, state, or local criteria for designation as a significant historic or architectural site or structure? The subject structure meets the local criteria for designation for Archi- tectural Significance, with rehabilitation capacity.  LDC Section 4.11.06. Criteria 1. c. Is the structure of such design, craftsmanship or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or expense? The structure displays a simplistic wood Frame Vernacular styling expressed by a rectangular plan, asbestos siding (possible over drop siding), and metal gable roof. The structure shows visible wear, how- ever the applicant has not provided an condition photos or documenta-tion. Is the structure one of the last remaining exam- ples of its kind in the county or region? This structure displays an architectural style that is commonly found throughout South Florida and it exhibits some modifications (siding and enclosed porch). Would retention of the structure promote the general welfare of the County by providing an opportunity for study of local history, architec-ture and design or by developing an understand- ing of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage? The architectural design and craftsmanship simple, but present, with the placement highlighting development patterns during boom-times. Are there definite plans for re-use of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what will be the effect of those plans on the char- acter of the surrounding area At this time, there are no plans to replace the structure. S t a f f A n a l y s i s The applicant is seeking to demolish the subject structure, located at the SW corner of S. 33rd Street and Rose Avenue, with no identified plans for replacement. Page 11 of 36 Page 12 of 36 Page 13 of 36 Page 14 of 36 Page 15 of 36 Page 16 of 36 Page 17 of 36 Demolition Proposal 1901 S 33 th St. Fort Pierce Fl 34947 Customer: Alex Hensley January 27, 2021 ALPHA DESIGN CONTRACTOR LLC Page 18 of 36 1) DEMOLITION EXPLANATION A) UNSAFE- STRUCTURE The existing structure has several structural defects, like years of wear and tear, rotting, termites ( inside the ﬂoor joist, beams, and trusses, These defects make the reconstruction of the structure impossible ( See Engineers Structural Evaluation ) Page 19 of 36 B) Vandalism- Trespassers ( Homeless) The property has been affected by trespassers who have been living on and off on the property, they have caused damages to the structure, IE Stealing copper wires, copper pipes, as well as destroying interior walls leaving trash and debris. ALPHA DESIGN CONTRACTOR LLC Page 20 of 36 C) Proposal of the future Reuse of property Mr. Hensley would like to build the Proposed Design like the one show below, being a life long resident of fort pierce. Mr. Hensley Would like to improve & Restore the area with similar Florida Architectural modern design. ALPHA DESIGN CONTRACTOR LLC Page 21 of 36 D) STRUTURAL ENGINEER EVALUATION ALPHA DESIGN CONTRACTOR LLC Bernard Jones Architect 1395 Brickell Ave. Suite 800 Miami, FL 33131 www.Advanced-Design-Building.com Cell: 561-718-0831 January 21, 2021 To: City of Port Saint Lucie Building Department Ref: Permit # 2054798 1122 SW Jennifer Ave. Port St Lucie, FL 34953 Dear Sir/Madam: Please accept this letter concerning the referenced Project: -The following revisions have made at the Plan review request: 1- Sheet D-2: Product Approvals was changed. 2 - Truss Engineering Sheets: Is signed for designer. If you have any questions please be free to contact me. Sincerely, Bernard Jones Architect of Record AR-0015193 Humberto Estevez Structural Engineer 16619 NE 72nd Ave Miami Lakes, FL 33014 www.inivos.group Cell: 786-516-3016 January 13, 2021 To: St Lucie County Building Department Ref: Structural Evaluation 1901 s 33rd St. Fort Pierce, FL 34947 Sincerely, Humberto Estevez P.E., S.E. 87611 If you have any questions or concerns please be free to contact me. Dear Sir/ Madam: -The following structural evaluation was made at the request of the owner Mr Alexander Hensley. Please accept this letter concerning the referenced Project: -I have personal inspected the existing home structure, located at 1901 s 33rd street Fort Pierce, FL 34947, upon my inspection I have deemed the structure beyond repair & the current status as unsafe for anyone to be inside. X._______________________ Humberto Estevez Digitally signed by Humberto Estevez Date: 2021.01.27 18:25:53 -05'00' Page 22 of 36 Bernard Jones Architect 1395 Brickell Ave. Suite 800 Miami, FL 33131 www.Advanced-Design-Building.com Cell: 561-718-0831 January 21, 2021 To: City of Port Saint Lucie Building Department Ref: Permit # 2054798 1122 SW Jennifer Ave. Port St Lucie, FL 34953 Dear Sir/Madam: Please accept this letter concerning the referenced Project: -The following revisions have made at the Plan review request: 1- Sheet D-2: Product Approvals was changed. 2 - Truss Engineering Sheets: Is signed for designer. If you have any questions please be free to contact me. Sincerely, Bernard Jones Architect of Record AR-0015193 Humberto Estevez Structural Engineer 16619 NE 72nd Ave Miami Lakes, FL 33014 www.inivos.group Cell: 786-516-3016 January 13, 2021 To: St Lucie County Building Department Ref: Structural Evaluation 1901 s 33rd St. Fort Pierce, FL 34947 Sincerely, Humberto Estevez P.E., S.E. 87611 If you have any questions or concerns please be free to contact me. Dear Sir/ Madam: -The following structural evaluation was made at the request of the owner Mr Alexander Hensley. Please accept this letter concerning the referenced Project: -I have personal inspected the existing home structure, located at 1901 s 33rd street Fort Pierce, FL 34947, upon my inspection I have deemed the structure beyond repair & the current status as unsafe for anyone to be inside. X._______________________ Humberto Estevez Digitally signed by Humberto Estevez Date: 2021.01.27 18:25:53 -05'00' Page 23 of 36 Meeting Date February 2, 2021 Owner Bruce & Jeanne Sallah 374 NE 2nd Street Boca Raton, FL 33432-4004 Historic Status Non-Designated Structure Eligible for Local Designation Applicant Request Demolish original wood frame structure. Request & Staff Recommendation Evaluate the historic signifi-cance and condition of the subject structure, and consid-er whether to pursue designa-tion as historic or release the request for demolition. Staff Kori Benton, AICP Historic Preservation Officer S t . L u c i e C o u n t y H i s t o r i c a l C o m m i s s i o n H i s t o r y c. 1945 Date of Home Construction per Florida Master Site File (8SL1793) c. 1950 Date of Additions—Porch/Room Addition c. 1960 Date of Significant Alterations Request: The Building and Code Division are seeking authorization to release demoli-tion of the subject structure if the Board of County Commissioners authorizes removal of this condemned structure. S i t e O v e r v i e w Architectural Snapshot & Historical Significance: This structure displays a simply Florida vernacular architectural style that is commonly found throughout South Florida. The structure has undergone non-historic modifications and additions which limit the architectural significance, particularly window replacement/ opening changes and re-roof. In addition, there are no known significant historical associations with important persons or events and it is isolated from the concentration of eligible structures in the White City area. This structure is considered ineligible for listing in the NRHP, on an individual basis or as part of a historic district. The widening of Midway Road has influenced the spatial relationship of the subject parcel, with the FDOT providing a settlement agreement with the owner. Agenda Item 8.A. Location 2083 Midway Road Planning and Development Services Department Historic Preservation 2083 Midway Road—Primary Structure Zoning RS-4, Single Family Residential Applicant St. Lucie County Bldg./Code 2300 Virginia Ave Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Parcel ID 3403-502-0113-000-2 Subject Site Midway Road 25 t h S t r e e t Page 24 of 36 2 Photos: 2020 Previous Site Photos (2006) Current Photos Page 25 of 36 3 S t a f f R e c o m m e n d a t i o n The Commission shall evaluate the historic significance and current condition of the subject structure, and consider whether to pursue designation of the structure as historic or release the request for demolition. Staff recommends release of the demolition, unless definitive steps are taken toward rehabilitation within 60 days, if eligible under Florida Building/FEMA Codes. Attachments Building & Code Division Photos Florida Master Site File Demolition Request Highlights Is the structure of such interest or quality that it would reasonably meet national, state, or local criteria for designation as a significant historic or architectural site or structure? The subject structure meets the local criteria for designation for Archi-tectural Significance, if significant rehabilitation and restoration ef- forts commence.  LDC Section 4.11.06. Criteria 1. c. Is the structure of such design, craftsmanship or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or expense? The structure displays a simplistic wood Frame Vernacular styling expressed by a rectangular plan, drop siding, and gable roof. The dete- riorating condition been documented. Is the structure one of the last remaining exam- ples of its kind in the county or region? This structure displays an architectural style that is commonly found throughout South Florida and it exhibits numerous modifications (window/doors/roof). Would retention of the structure promote the general welfare of the County by providing an opportunity for study of local history, architec-ture and design or by developing an understand- ing of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage? The architectural design and craftsmanship are minimal, however the structure’s construction along Midway Road in the 1940s highlights the growth and development patterns toward the mid-century. Are there definite plans for re-use of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what will be the effect of those plans on the char- acter of the surrounding area At this time, there are no plans to replace the structure. S t a f f A n a l y s i s The Building Official has determined the structure to be damaged and deteriorated to such an extent that restoration or repair costs will exceed fifty (50) percent of the value, after restoration or repair. This significantly damaged building is considered unsafe and unsanitary for use as a single-family dwelling. This building, in its current condition, is deemed to constitute a public nuisance. The owner is being noticed to take action demolish the structure or otherwise rectify the nuisance, or the matter will be brought to the Board of County Commissioners for consideration of a condemnation. Before moving forward with con- demnation, the Historical Commission shall consider the potential demolition. Page 26 of 36 Page 27 of 36 Page 28 of 36 Page 29 of 36 Page 30 of 36 Page 31 of 36 Page 32 of 36 Page 33 of 36 Page 34 of 36 Page 35 of 36 Page 36 of 36