Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout08.09.2021HISTORICAL COMMISSION AGENDA ST. LUCIE COUNTY Regular Meeting Monday, August 9, 2021 4:00 PM St. Lucie County Commission Chambers 2300 Virginia Avenue 3rd Floor of Roger Poitras Building Fort Pierce, FL 34982 BOARD MEMBERS CHAIRMAN Anthropology, Archaeology, History RICHARD MCAFOOS Land Use Planning or Historic Preservation Planning KRISSTA KING Architecture MIKE MENARD Layperson BETTY JO STARK VICE-CHAIR MELANIE TREWYN Conservation/Curation MIKE MIDDLEBROOK Construction JUDY BIGLIN Mission Statement St. Lucie Works to deliver superior service that enhances our quality of life Page 1 of 65 Historical Commission Monday, August 9, 2021 4:00 PM 2 | P a g e GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES – Attached is the agenda, which will determine the order of business conducted at today’s Board meeting. REGULAR AGENDA – Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items, which the Commission will discuss individually, usually in the order listed on the agenda. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chair will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION – Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS – These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT – Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Comments may pertain to any matter related to the Board’s duties as the County’s governing body. General comments in support or opposition to candidates for public office are not pertinent to the Board’s duties. DECORUM – Please be respectful of others’ opinions. MEETINGS – All Board meetings are open to the public and are held quarterly on the third Tuesdays of month at 4 p.m. and on the Meetings are held in the Planning Conference Room in the Planning and Development Services Department at 2300 Virginia Ave., Fort Pierce, Fla. 34982. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Human Resource Department at 772-462-1546, HumanResources@stlucieco.org or TDD 772-462-1428 at least 48 hours prior to the meeting. Page 2 of 65 Historical Commission Monday, August 9, 2021 4:00 PM 3 | P a g e 1.CALL TO ORDER 2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 3.ROLL CALL 4.ANNOUNCEMENTS 5.PUBLIC COMMENT 6.MINUTES A.Approval of the June 22, 2021 Historical Commission Meeting Minutes 7.ITEMS FOR ACTION / CONSIDERATION A.OLD BUSINESS B.NEW BUSINESS 1.Request for Demolition of the Structures at 9809 South Indian River Drive, Fort Pierce. 2.Review application to name a proposed Artificial Reef in St. Lucie County - Blake Charron Memorial Reef 8.MEMBER MATTERS 9.DISCUSSION 10.ADJOURNMENT Page 3 of 65 HISTORICAL COMMISSION ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Regular Meeting June 22, 2021 Convened: 4:00 pm Adjourned: 5:30 pm 1. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 4:00 PM by Chair McAfoos. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Pledge of Allegiance led by Chair McAfoos. 3. ROLL CALL Roll Call was conducted by Commission Secretary. Present Chair Richard McAfoos, Vice Chair Melanie Trewyn, Commission Member Judy Biglin, Commission Member Betty Starke, Commission Member Mike Menard, Commission Member Krissta King (arrived at 4:16 pm) Absent Mike Middlebrook, Commission Member Others Present STAFF: Heather Young, Asst. County Attorney, Caroline Valentin, Asst. County Attorney, Kori Benton, Historic Preservation Officer, Stephanie Guevara, Acting Staff Secretary, Doug Harvey, Building Official, Thondra Lanese, Business Navigator PRESENTERS: Chris Mass, Applicant, Georgia Wood, Owner. 4. ANNOUNCEMENTS None. 5. PUBLIC COMMENT None. 6. MINUTES Page 4 of 65 Historical Commission Tuesday, June 22, 2021 4:00 PM 2 | P a g e A. Approval of the April 6, 2021 Historical Commission Meeting Minutes RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Vice Chair Melanie Trewyn SECONDER: Commission Member Betty Starke AYES: Chair Richard McAfoos, Betty Starke, Vice-Chair Melanie Trewyn, Mike Menard, Judy Biglin, NAYS: None ABSTAIN: None 7. ITEMS FOR ACTION / CONSIDERATION A. OLD BUSINESS None. B. NEW BUSINESS 1. Request for Demolition of the Wood Frame Structure situated at 1103 W Midway Road, Fort Pierce, for a proposed Redevelopment Project. STAFF PRESENTATION: Kori Benton, Historic Preservation Officer presented the Demolition Request for the "Stetcher House", located at 1103 W. Midway Road, and a conceptual re-development plan for a Frozen Custard Café. Mr. Benton noted the applicant is seeking demolition to develop a new neighborhood commercial establishment, presenting preliminary concepts for redevelopment, but not to the level of a Pre-application Meeting with the County’s Development Review Committee. He affirmed the County’s Community Architectural Standards contained in Land Development Code (LDC) Section 7.10.24 would apply to any new development, including theWhit's Custard restaurant. Mr. Benton displayed photos of the existing structure, discussed its history, current condition, past site visit, and the architectural themes intended for the redevelopment. Staff recommends the Commission evaluate the historic significance and current condition of the subject structure and consider whether to pursue designation of the structure as historic or release the request for demolition. Staff provided potential motions. COMMISSION DISCUSSION: Mr. Menard inquired about options, and functionality, if the lot were to be split or cut off. Mr. Benton responded that the county's typical requirement is a minimum 10,000 sq. ft. of land, for a commercial neighborhood parcel,to accommodate access, parking and stormwater. Vice Chair Trewyn inquired if there are similar structures in the district, or surrounding area. Mr. Page 5 of 65 Historical Commission Tuesday, June 22, 2021 4:00 PM 3 | P a g e Benton suggested there are structures of similar design and history, affirming that there could still be an opportunity for a local historic district even in the absence of this structure.. Starke inquired if the structure can be restored as there has been a lot of change in that area. Ms. Biglin inquired if she can ask questions after the applicant presentation and Chair McAfoos responded that she may. APPLICANT PRESENTATION: Chris Mass, 231 SE Cowrances Dr. PSL, FL 34984, current owner of Whit's custard three (3) locations. His vision is to keep the style of the district, to contribute to the White City heritage. The structure’s condition, location, cost to rehabilitate and redevelopment plan are the reasons for the request. The business supports local charities and provides 50% discount to all first responders. Also created the Scooper Stars program to reward elementary and middle school students for displaying acts of kindness with no limit or contingencies and receive a free scoop of custard. COMMISSION DISCUSSION: Mr. Menard inquired if the applicant would considered subdividing the parcel for someone to purchase the home. Mr. Mass responded that the location of the current structure would provide issues with ingress egress and visibility. Ms. Biglin expressed concerns for the residence and giving opportunity for the public to purchase it as a residence instead of commercial. Vice Chair Trewyn made a comment regarding setting a precedent with a family centered business because if not we would get more commercial type buildings. Mr. Menard inquired about demolition approval and the new design, whether it would come back before the historical commission for approval or just DRC approval. Mr. Benton stated that it would be approved by DRC with arch designs of the Land Development Code for the County. Mr. Mass responded that corporate is a family of three and has freedom to build as he would like. Chair McAfoos stated that the second approval motion would entail that request. Mr. Benton responded that it does entail arch requirements. Vice Chair Trewyn inquired if there are parts of the original structure can be used for the new development. Mr. Mass walked the structure with SLC staff and noted that there is nothing really salvageable – beyond some windows, but an alternative may be adding a monument in recognition of the previous structure and White City. Ms. Biglin wanted to clarify what would happen if another business were to purchase the land. Mr. Benton responded that a motion could allow for demolition, contingent upon the applicant working with their architect to meet the architectural design requirements, however as the motion is currently presented there’s nothing to prevent the project from being abandoned. The motion could support the demolition on the premise of this specific infill project versus a modified application. Vice Chair Trewyn clarified that the applicant is going to present his structure and gets approved, then the current structure would be demolished. Mr. Benton stated that a modification to the second published motion to include content stated by the Vice Chair may be pursued. OWNER PRESENTATION: Georgia Wood, 5006 Citrus Avenue, is the owner of the structure. The structure is beyond repair and expensive to restore it. It has been for sale for 2 years with no offers. Page 6 of 65 Historical Commission Tuesday, June 22, 2021 4:00 PM 4 | P a g e COMMISSION DISCUSSION: Mr. Benton presented modified motion. Ms. Starke commented in regards to making the decision based on building material costs. Ms. Young clarified that the project would come back to the historical commission only if the current owner does not proceed and the subsequent owner wanted to go thru the demolition process again. Mr. Mass responded to Ms. Starke stating the decision for demolition was not based on cost but scope of the work involved and is unsalvageable. COMMISSION DECISION: Vice Chair Ms. Trewyn read the motion as follows: After considering the application documents, the staff report, staff comments & testimony presented during the public meeting and the standards set forth in sections 4.11.06. - Designation process and procedure and 4.11.07. - Emergency actions of the St. Lucie county land development code, I hereby move that the St. Lucie county historical commission approve the demolition request (not initiating an emergency action) on the premise the presented infill project receives a site development permit from the St. Lucie county Development Review Committee (DRC), including strict adherence with the community architectural standards of LDC section 7.10.24 prior to the demolition action, and further requesting a method to commemorate the subject structure within the proposed new establishment. RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Vice Chair Melanie Trewyn SECONDER: Commission Member Krissta King AYES: Chair Richard McAfoos, Betty Starke, Vice Chair Melanie Trewyn, Mike Menard, Krissta King, Judy Biglin NAYS: None ABSTAIN: None 8. MEMBER MATTERS Ms. Biglin inquired about forming the committee to be proactive to save these homes. Mr. Benton responded that with limited county resources it is challenging to create this plan but we will take the feedback into consideration. Ms. Starke requested guidelines for saving historical structures and take action into that regards. Vice Chair Trewyn spoke to the concerns and would look into benchmarking how things have been done in other places. Chair McAfoos inquired about other requests. Mr. Benton responded that there has been a designation request. 9. DISCUSSION None. 10. ADJOURNMENT Page 7 of 65 Historical Commission Tuesday, June 22, 2021 4:00 PM 5 | P a g e RESULT: APPROVE MOVER: Commission Member Mike Menard SECONDER: Commission Member Judy Biglin AYES: Richard McAfoos, Betty Starke, Melanie Trewyn, Mike Menard, Krissta King, Judy Biglin NAYS: None EXCUSED: None Meeting adjourned at 5:33pm . Page 8 of 65 A UGUST 9, 2021 Owner / Applicant Historic Status Non-Designated Structure Eligible for Local Designation Applicant Request Demolition of a primary residence, accessory guest house and garage. Staff Request & Recommendation Evaluate the historic signifi-cance and condition of the subject structure, and consid- er whether to pursue designa-tion of the structures as his-toric or release of the request for demolition. Staff Kori Benton, AICP Historic Preservation Officer S T . LU C I E C O U N T Y H I S T O R I C A L C O M M I S S I O N H I S T O R Y c. 1941 Date of Residence construction per Florida Master Site File (8SL1231) c. 1953 Date of Guest House & Garage construction the Property Appraiser’s records A N A L Y S I S O V E R V I E W Historical Significance: The primary wood frame structure is associated with WWII & Aftermath, with the original guest house and garage contributing to the campus. Architectural Significance: The single-story wood frame residence located at 9809 South Indian River Drive represents a simplistic styling expressed by a rectangular plan, drop siding, and side gable roof with composition shingles and various decora-tive trim. Exterior wall fabric consists of drop siding, with some modern siding replacements. The primary structure predominantly features non-original windows, with 2 over 2 design. Building modified are estimated in the 1960s and 2015. A non-original wood deck wraps a notable portion of the structure. The guest house has maintained much of the original design and material, whereas the garage has some non- original siding, windows and door. Request: The applicants are requesting to demolish the primary residence, guest house and garage to pursue a redevelop- ment project including subdivision. The applicant met with the St. Lucie County Development Review Com-mittee (DRC) to explore subdivision of the 3.93-acre into two (2) or four (4) lots. Agenda Item 3. New Business 1. Location 9809 South Indian River Drive Parcel ID 3529-223-0001-000-5 9809 South Indian River Drive—Fort Pierce, FL Zoning RE-2 (Residential, Estate – 2du/ac) Zoning District, Subject site Planning and Development Services Department Historic Preservation Linda Ash-Jackson & Paul Jackson Page 9 of 65 2 Photo Date Unknown Location Exhibits Primary Residence Page 10 of 65 3 Photo Date c.2017 Primary House Guest House Garage Page 11 of 65 4 Survey Snapshot Development Concept Guest House Primary Residence Garage Page 12 of 65 5 S T A F F R E C O M M E N D A T I O N Staff recommends the Commission evaluate the historic significance of the subject structures, and consider whether to pursue designa- tion of the structures as historic or release the request for demolition. Attachments Florida Master Site File 8SL1231 Demolition Request Highlights Is the structure of such interest or quality that it would reasonably meet national, state, or local criteria for designation as a significant historic or architectural site or structure? The subject structures generally meet the local criteria for designation as significant historic, for Architectural Significance, context of devel- opment during WWII and the subsequent development period. • LDC Section 4.11.06. Criteria 1. Is the structure of such design, craftsmanship or material that it could be reproduced only with great difficulty or expense? The structures displays a simple Wood Frame Vernacular styling ex- pressed by a by a rectangular lines, drop siding, and gable roofs, fea- turing composition shingles, and simple ornamental features. The structural condition has not been well documented, however the struc- tures are presumed to be in good condition. Is the structure one of the last remaining exam- ples of its kind in the county or region? The structures display an architectural style that is commonly found throughout South Florida and exhibit some modifications. Would retention of the structure promote the general welfare of the County by providing an opportunity for study of local history, architec- ture and design or by developing an understand- ing of the importance and value of a particular culture and heritage? The structure reflects development the development pattern along In- dian River Drive in the 1940s, as architectural styles shifted. The ar- chitecture and design is limited, however the development pattern and context are valuable. The guest house condition, and detached nature of the garage contrib- ute to the historic development pattern along the Drive. Incorporating these structure into the redevelopment plan is encouraged, considering greater viability to relocate. Are there definite plans for re-use of the property if the proposed demolition is carried out, and what will be the effect of those plans on the char- acter of the surrounding area The applicant has presented preliminary plans for redevelopment, however the viability has not been verified. A “Lot Split” application, to divide the parcel into two lots is active with St. Lucie County. A copy of the 2021 Pre-application Report for the proposed redevelop- ment is attached for review. S T A F F A N A L Y S I S Page 13 of 65 6 Potential Motions AFTER CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION DOCUMENTS, THE STAFF REPORT, STAFF COMMENTS & TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC MEETING AND THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 4.11.06. - DESIGNATION PROCESS AND PROCEDURE AND 4.11.07. - EMERGENCY AC- TIONS OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION APPROVE THE DEMOLITION REQUEST(S) (NOT INITI- ATING AN EMERGENCY ACTION) BECAUSE... AFTER CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION DOCUMENTS, THE STAFF REPORT, STAFF COMMENTS & TES-TIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC MEETING AND THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 4.11.06. - DESIGNATION PROCESS AND PROCEDURE AND 4.11.07. - EMERGENCY AC- TIONS OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY HISTORI-CAL COMMISSION APPROVE THE DEMOLITION REQUEST FOR THE PRI- MARY RESIDENCE (NOT INITIATING AN EMERGENCY ACTION), ENCOURAGING THE PRESERVA- TION OF THE GUEST HOUSE & GARAGE WITHIN FUTURE DEVELOPMENT PLANS… AFTER CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION DOCUMENTS, THE STAFF REPORT, STAFF COMMENTS & TES-TIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC MEETING AND THE STANDARDS SET FORTH IN SECTIONS 4.11.06. - DESIGNATION PROCESS AND PROCEDURE AND 4.11.07. - EMERGENCY AC- TIONS OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY HISTORI-CAL COMMISSION DISAPPROVE THE DEMOLITION REQUEST(S), IN FA- VOR OF INITIATING AN EMER-GENCY ACTION TO DESIGNATE THE SUBJECT STRUCTURE(S) WITH A RECOMMENDATION THAT THE OWNER IS ABLE TO DIVIDE THE SUBJECT PARCEL TO ALLOW AN ADDITIONAL HOME / PROPOSED INFILL PROJECT WHILE PRECLUDING DEMOLITION TO THIS HISTORIC RESOURCE IN THE WHITE CITY HERITAGE AREA. THE MOTION INTENDING TO SUPPORT REASONABLE DIMENSIONAL AND DESIGN CRITERIA CONCESSIONS NECESSARY TO PRESERVE THE STRUCTURE(S) BECAUSE... Page 14 of 65 4261 Dant Blvd Reno, NV 89509 Kris McCrain Associate Planner St. Lucie County, Florida Via email: McCraink@stlucieco.org Re: Jackson Lot Split (LS-5202126032) & Greystoke Estate Pre-Application (PreApp- 4202126023) 9809 South Indian River Drive Parcel ID: 3529-223-0001-000-5 Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Request for historical review Dear Mr. McCrain: Thank you so much for all of your help on this project. As we have discussed there are two living structures on the existing 4 acre lot. These are the original home dated 1940, and a smaller guest house dated 1953. The main home apparently had been struck by lightning in the relatively recent past and had been completely rebuilt we assume from the permitting that has been done within the past 10- 12 years. It had been completely remodeled. The only original features we believe are there, are some Dade County pine floors that we were planning on salvaging, and the fireplace that is non-functional today and likely requires extensive rebuilding if we were to keep the house intact. Kitchen, baths, bedroom, electrical are all modern. The guest house is smaller; The floors have been replaced and the kitchen and the bath reflect modern remodeling and styling. We have been investigating how to manage our plans based on moving or demolishing one or both of these structures. We would like to request a historical review of the structures to determine if either or both would be required to be relocated on the property, or if they can be taken down and used for salvage. At the present time, we are unable to occupy these homes since we were unable to secure homeowners’ insurance, other than fire and liability, and they are insured as vacant. Page 15 of 65 We will be in Florida the 22nd of July to the 29th in the morning and we can take any photos or meet someone at the site to review if that is required. At lease one of us will attend the meeting in person on August 9. Please let me know if you or the Historical Committee require any additional information Very truly yours, Linda Ash-Jackson and Paul Jackson Page 16 of 65 Page 17 of 65 Page 18 of 65 Page 19 of 65 Page 20 of 65 Page 21 of 65 Page 22 of 65 1 PLANNING & DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT Planning Division DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMMITTEE (DRC) Pre-Application Report Greystoke Estates Applicant/ Property Owner: Paul Jackson & Linda Ash-Jackson Agent for Applicant: N/A County Project Coordinator: Kristopher McCrain, Associate Planner Assistant Director: Benjamin Balcer, AICP Assistant Planning Manager: Kori Benton, AICP County Project Number: PreApp – 4202126023 Application Type(s): Pre-Application Site Address: 9809 S. Indian River Drive, Fort Pierce FL 34982 Parcel Identification Number(s): 3529-223-0001-000-5 Date Pre-Application Submitted: April 27, 2021 Staff Review Comment Due Date: May 19, 2021 Pre-Application Meeting Date: June 3, 2021 DRC Report Date: June 18, 2021 DESCRIPTION OF REQUEST This Pre-Application request with the St. Lucie County Development Review Committee (DRC) is regarding a proposed subdivision of the 3.93-acre parcel located at 9809 S. Indian River Drive in Fort Pierce. The applicant has concurrently submitted a Lot Split application with the Planning and Development Services Department to subdivide the parcel in half, from west to east. An existing single-family dwelling (Constructed in 1940) and an accessory guest home and detached garage (Constructed in 1953) are currently located on the property; however, the applicant has expressed an interest to demolish the structures. Due to the potential historic relevance of these structures, the Historical Commission has requested review and determination for historical designations. The property is located within the RE-2 (Residential, Estate – 2du/ac) Zoning District, and designated by the RS (Residential, Suburban) Future Land Use. The project is located within the Urban Service Boundary (USB). The comments in this report are based on the above information and the pre-application materials received and date stamped by the Planning and Development, Planning Division on Tuesday, April 27, 2021, and the discussion held at the pre-application meeting on Thursday, June 3, 2021. A. Review Assessment The specific comments of each review agency related to this request are identified in Sections B through L of this report. These comments are provided to assist you with the submission of a development application(s) and/or building permit(s). If you need more information or further clarification on any comments in a specific section as noted below, please feel free to contact the reviewer listed. Page 23 of 65 Project Name: Greystoke Estates Project File No.: PreApp-4202126023 2 Sec. Department Reviewer Phone Email B Planning & Development Kris McCrain 462-1265 McCrainK@stlucieco.org *Planning Manager Linda Pendarvis 462-1562 PendarvisL@stlcuieco.org C Business Navigator Thondra Lanese 462-2548 Laneset@stlucieco.org D County Surveyor Contact David Hays 462-1721 HaysD@stlucieco.org E Environmental Resources Jenn McGee 462-3862 McgeeJ@stlucieco.org F Public Works David Hays, P.E. 462-1491 HaysD@stlucieco.org G Property Acquisitions Kayla Chidgey 462-1725 ChidgeyK@stlucieco.org H Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority Martha Kerr 466-1600 mkerr@fpua.com I St. Lucie County Utilities Ray Murankus 462-5221 MurankusR@stlucieco.org J St. Lucie County Fire District Capt. Wayne Boyer 621-3322 WBoyer@slcfd.org K Building/Permitting Doug Harvey 462-2186 HarveyD@stlucieco.org L St. Lucie County School District Marty Sanders, P.E. 216-5755 Marvin.sanders@stlucieschools.org B. Determination of Compliance with Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan Requirement – Planning & Development Services Department 1. Pursuant to Land Development Code (LDC) Section 11.02.02(B), any division of land into less than ten (10) parcels but more than two (2) parcels require the submittal of a Minor Site Plan in accordance with the provisions of LDC Section 11.03.00. a. Pursuant to LDC Section 11.03.01, where a proposed Minor Site Plan includes the subdivision of land, a condition of the Final Development Order requires approval by the Board of County Commissioners of a plat conforming to the site plan. The plat requirements of this Section require review and approval of construction plans, a preliminary record plat and a final record plat. b. LDC Section 11.02.09. details the submittal requirements for Minor and Major Site Plans. i. The project requires concurrency analysis to verify adequate Public Facilities are available to serve the proposed project. A Traffic Statement, accounting for the existing Level of Service of the adjacent roadway link, will be requested. c. The Planning and Development Services Department applications and a fee schedule can be found on the St. Lucie County website at http://www.stlucieco.gov/planning/applications. 2. Upon the submittal of a Minor Site Plan application, each lot shall meet the minimum dimensional requirements for the RE-2 (Residential, Estate – 2du/ac) Zoning District as outlined in LDC Section 7.04.01 - Lot Size and Dimensional Requirements, and other applicable ordinances. (See Table 7-10 Below) Table 7-10 Lot Size and Dimensional Requirements Zoning District Min. Lot Size (ft2) Min. Lot Width Min. Road Frontage Minimum Yard Front Rear Side Side @ Corner RE-2 (Residential, Estate- 2du/ac) 15,000 ft2 100 ft 100 ft 25 ft 15 ft 10 ft 20 ft Page 24 of 65 Project Name: Greystoke Estates Project File No.: PreApp-4202126023 3 3. Pursuant to LDC Section 7.05.03 (Table 7-15), the minimum right-of-way width for the private roadway shall be 70 feet. 4. Pursuant to LDC Section 7.08.01, all new development shall be served with underground electric, cable television, telephone, and similar wire service. Please provide a note to this effect on the site plan sheet. 5. The applicant has expressed an interest to demolish the existing single-family dwelling, accessory guest home and detached garage. The Historical Commission must review these structures for historical significance prior to the issuance of a demolition permit. Advisory Note: • Pursuant to LDC Section 7.10.04, the RE-2 (Residential, Estate – 2du/ac) Zoning District allows for guest homes as an accessory use, provided that upon receiving a building permit for this use, the property owner sign a notarized statement to the effect that under no circumstances shall the guest house be used for rental purposes seasonal or annual. • The applicant shall coordinate with the St. Lucie County Health Department regarding the potential to permit additional wells and septic systems for the proposed lots. C. Determination of Compliance with Business Navigator – Planning & Development Services Department St. Lucie County has a Business Navigator to provide businesses with assistance in navigating the internal and external regulatory processes, and to act as a liaison between County staff, outside agencies, and other business entities to provide high-quality customer service experience. If you need further assistance with regulatory processes, please contact our Business Navigator, Thondra Lanese with the Planning & Development Services Department at (772) 462-2548 or Laneset@stlucieco.org D. Determination of Compliance with County Survey Requirements – Engineering Division, Public Works Department All comments are based on the current Standards of Practice, established by the Board of Professional Surveyors and Mappers, Chapter 5J-17, Florida Administrative Codes, pursuant to current Section 472.027, Florida Statutes, per 5J-17.050 thru 5J-17.052. 1. The survey will be reviewed at time of a formal application submittal. E. Determination of Compliance with Environmental Requirements – Environmental Resources Department Background: The Environmental Resources Department (ERD) is responsible for protecting and preserving the County’s natural resources through compliance with the County’s Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Code. The following information is preliminary based upon the information provided for your pre-application meeting and is intended to assist you in submitting a complete site plan application. Additional comments may be provided at time of site plan submittal based upon additional information received. We encourage you to communicate the project constraints, timelines, etc. to ERD so we may better understand your needs and work together to meet the intent of the Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan and ensure a sustainable environment for all citizens of St. Lucie County. Findings: The following items will be required at time of site plan submittal: 1. A landscape plan consistent with Land Development Code 7.09.03 and 7.09.04 including but not limited to the following: Page 25 of 65 Project Name: Greystoke Estates Project File No.: PreApp-4202126023 4 a. A minimum 15 ft. landscaped buffer along road right of ways where applicable per LDC 7.09.04(A). b. Where applicable, screen vehicular use areas from adjacent properties within a 10 ft. wide landscape buffer consisting of one (1) native shade tree every 30 linear ft. and a 48” continuous native hedge per LDC 7.09.04(B); c. Interior vehicular use area calculations and required landscaping per LDC 7.09.04(C). Surface parking and other vehicular use areas shall have at least one (1) square foot of interior landscaping for every eighteen (18) square feet or major fraction thereof of off-street parking and vehicular use area. Each separately landscaped area shall contain a minimum of one hundred eighty (180) square feet and shall have a minimum width of at least ten (10) feet and shall include at least one (1) shade tree of an appropriate species with the remaining area adequately landscaped with shrubs, ground cover, or other authorized landscaping material not to exceed three (3) feet in height. d. A shoreline planting plan consistent with LDC 6.02.02 2. A tree survey consistent with Land Development Code 11.02.09(i). This requirement may be waived if the alternative 25 percent habitat set aside option is utilized consistent with LDC 6.00.05(D)(3)(b). 3. A tree mitigation plan consistent with Land Development Code 6.00.05(D) 4. A boundary survey per LDC 11.02.09(A). This survey shall include any jurisdictional wetlands onsite, including but not limited to fringe wetlands along the Indian River Lagoon. 5. A site plan including Shoreline buffer requirements outlined in LDC 6.02.02.C 6. An Environmental Impact Report consistent with Land Development Code 11.02.09(A)(5) is required per LDC 11.02.09(A)(5)(a)(1) as the subject site is included within the Inventory of Native Ecosystems for St. Lucie County. This shall include, but is not limited to, the following: a. The subject site contains habitat suitable for state and federally listed species including but not limited to gopher tortoises and Florida scrub jays. Species specific surveys for all potential state and federally listed species shall be provided by a qualified environmental professional consist with state and federal survey guidelines. b. An assessment of the impacts upon onsite vegetation and wildlife, and onsite and off-site natural resources; a description of the planned approach that will be used to minimize these impacts; a description of the proposed alterations or disturbances to any of the areas identified in response to Sections 11.02.09(A)(5)(b)(1)(c) and (d) above; and the mitigation that will be provided. c. A shoreline protection plan including a native shoreline planting plan consistent with LDC 6.02.02 Riverine Shoreline Protection Standards. Staff Recommendations: Though not required by code, ERD recommends the following: 1. Incorporate low impact development features, such as: landscaping dry detention areas with native vegetation, creating curb-cuts to direct stormwater into landscape islands, utilizing rain barrels/cisterns to collect water for irrigation, and preserving/planting native vegetation in lieu of sod; for more information regarding low impact development, please visit: http://www.lid-stormwater.net/lid_techniques.htm. Please contact the Environmental Resources office at (772) 462-2526 if you need additional assistance or have any questions. F. Determination of Compliance with Engineering & Water Quality Requirements – Public Works Department The following comments are offered based on plans dated 6/26/18: Page 26 of 65 Project Name: Greystoke Estates Project File No.: PreApp-4202126023 5 1. A Site Plan and Plat will likely be required. 2. Provide a site plan showing the proposed roadway with dimensions and the driveway connection to Indian River Drive with radius of return. 3. Provide a tabular breakdown of existing and proposed impervious areas by type. 4. Provide the flood zone and FIRM panel for this location on the Site Plan. 5. Identify on the Site Plan where the stormwater treatment area(s) will be located. 6. Provide typical pavement sections for the internal roadway. The internal road will be required to be paved with asphalt or concrete. 7. A cul-de-sac will be required at the end of the proposed roadway. 8. A Site Development Permit is required prior to performing site improvement activities. Following DRC approval, the applicant may submit the required documents to Grant Chambers, P.E. in the Engineering Division. Documents are to include, a Site Development Permit application, two sets of plans, one copy of the stormwater report and other appropriate information. The Site Development Permit application can be found on the County’s website under the Public Works Department link. In accordance with the permit and Land Development Regulations, the applicant shall retain the EOR for site inspections and final certification. 9. For plat approval prior to completion of required improvements, a Subdivision Improvement Agreement and appropriate bonding is required. For discussion regarding these comments, please contact David Hays at (772) 462-1491, haysd@stlucieco.org or Grant Chambers at (772) 462-2741, chambersg@stlucieco.org. G. Determination of Compliance with Property Acquisitions Requirements – Property Acquisition Division, Legal Department The Parcel has the following frontage: 1. Indian River Drive is a 30’ County owned and maintained right-of-way. 2. The rear of the property abuts the Florida East Coast Railway. H. Determination of Compliance with Utilities Requirements – Fort Pierce Utilities Authority 1. Water & Wastewater Engineering: a. The subject parcel is more than two miles south of the southern boundary of the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority water and wastewater boundary. b. Water and wastewater services are not available to serve the subject parcel. 2. Electric & Gas Engineering: a. Electric and Gas Engineering Department have reviewed the application. b. The property is not in the FPUA electric service area. Located in FPL service area. I. Determination of Compliance with Utilities Requirements – St. Lucie County Utilities Department 1. There is no water or wastewater infrastructure available for this project. J. Determination of Compliance with Fire Requirements – St. Lucie County Fire District The Fire District has a separate application form. Please submit a completed application for Development/Site Plan Review (St. Lucie County Fire District Development & Site Plan Review Application). This form is available on- line at www.slcfd.org. Questions may be directed to Captain Wayne Boyer at (772) 621-3322. Page 27 of 65 Project Name: Greystoke Estates Project File No.: PreApp-4202126023 6 1. Security gates must either be manned 24 hour/day or provide an access control key switch on the control panel to allow for Fire Department entry in an emergency. Security gates must maintain a clear width of 12 feet when open and provide a means to open the gates manually upon loss of power. 2. Minimum roadway pavement width (two-way traffic) shall be twenty (20) feet. 3. Minimum roadway pavement width (one-way traffic) shall be twelve (12) feet. 4. Dead end roadways serving commercial or residential occupancies must include a cul-de-sac when the roadway length exceeds one hundred-fifty (150) feet. "Y" or "T" type turnaround arrangements are permitted. 5. The minimum acceptable cul-de-sac radius is 50 feet to the edge of pavement. 6. Per NFPA 1114 Chapter 9, Section 1.3. Prior to the final occupancy of any building, the permitted water supply for fire protection, including fire hydrants and fire suppression systems, shall be installed, tested, and acceptable to the AHJ (SLCFD). 7. Since there are no water mains or other means of water for fire protection, a 13D sprinkler system would be acceptable per the Fire Marshal. This system runs off of the owner’s domestic water supply (well). County Building Official Doug Harvey needs to know this as well so he can be on the lookout for this in the plans. The 13D system installs shall be in the developer’s agreement to be installed in all four homes once they are constructed. K. Determination of Compliance with Florida Building Code Requirements – Building/Permitting Department To facilitate your commercial Building Permit application through the permitting and plans review process, we recommend a pre-development permit application meeting with the applicant, the Building Official, Chief Plans Examiner and Fire District Plans Examiner to discuss your project and answer any questions you may have. In this way, key components of your project will be discussed, and you will be aware of pre-submittal permitting and Building/Fire code review requirements: this will serve to expedite your project to achieve a building permit. 1. No comments received at this time. L. Determination of Compliance with St. Lucie County School District Requirements – St. Lucie County School District 1. No comments received at this time. M. Attachments 1. Existing Lot Configuration Exhibit 2. Proposed Lot Configuration Exhibit Page 28 of 65 Project Name: Greystoke Estates Project File No.: PreApp-4202126023 7 Existing Lot Configuration Exhibit: Proposed Lot Configuration Exhibit: Page 29 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 1 of 11 Insured/Applicant Name: Paul & Linda Jackson Application / Policy #: Address Inspected: 9809 S Indian River Drive, Ft. Pierce, FL. 34982 (Main House) Actual Year Built: 1940 Date Inspected: 2/11/2021 Minimum Photo Requirements: Dwelling: Each side Roof: Each slope Plumbing: Water heater, under cabinet plumbing/drains, exposed valves Main electrical service panel with interior door label Electrical box with panel off All hazards or deficiencies noted in this report A Florida-licensed inspector must complete, sign and date this form. Be advised that Underwriting will rely on the information in this sample form, or a similar form, that is obtained from the Florida licensed professional of your choice. This information only is used to determine insurability and is not a warranty or assurance of the suitability, fitness or longevity of any of the systems inspected. Electrical System Separate documentation of any aluminum wiring remediation must be provided and certified by a licensed electrician. Main Panel: Type: Circuit breaker Fuse Total Amps: 200 AMP Is amperage sufficient for current usage? Yes No (explain) Second Panel: Type: Circuit breaker Fuse Total Amps: 50 AMP Is amperage sufficient for current usage? Yes No (explain) Indicate presence of any of the following: Cloth wiring Active knob and tube Branch circuit aluminum wiring (If present, describe the usage of all aluminum wiring): *If single strand (aluminum branch) wiring, provide details of all remediation. Separate documentation of all work must be provided. Connections repaired via COPALUM crimp Connections repaired via AlumiConn Hazards Present Blowing fuses Tripping breakers Empty sockets Loose wiring Improper grounding Corrosion Over fusing Double taps Exposed wiring Unsafe wiring Improper breaker size Scorching Other (explain) Incomplete labeling / open knock outs General condition of the electrical system: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory (explain) Panels need to be properly labeled. Garage sub panel had double tapping, non-brand breakers, an open knockout, and neutral and ground wires were shared on the same buss bar which is not allowed. Supplemental Information Main Panel Panel age: 6 years Year last updated: 2015 - whole house re-wired Brand/Model: Square D Second Panel Panel age: Unknown Year last updated: 2015 Brand/Model: GE Wiring Type Copper MN, BX or Conduit Page 30 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 2 of 11 HVAC System Central AC: Yes No Central heat: Yes No If not central heat, indicate primary heat source and fuel type: Are the heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems in good working order? Yes No (explain) Heat function not working, system may have low voltage wiring improperly completed. Evaporator coil needs service. Date of last HVAC servicing/inspection: Unknown Hazards Present Wood-burning stove or central gas fireplace not professionally installed? Yes No Space heater used as primary heat source? Yes No Is the source portable? Yes No Does the air handler/condensate line or drain pan show any signs of blockage or leakage, including water damage to the surrounding area? Yes No Supplemental Information Age of system: 4 years Year last updated: 2017 Plumbing System Is there a temperature pressure relief valve on the water heater? Yes No Is there any indication of an active leak? Yes No Is there any indication of a prior leak? Yes No Water heater location: Laundry room General condition of the following plumbing fixtures and connections to appliances: Dishwasher Refrigerator Washing machine Water heater Showers/Tubs Satisfactory Unsatisfactory N/A Toilets Sinks Sump pump Main shut off valve All other visible Satisfactory Unsatisfactory N/A If unsatisfactory, please provide comments/details (leaks, wet/soft spots, mold, corrosion, grout/caulk, etc.) Washing machine was not hooked up at the time of inspection and was not tested. Toilet(s) that are loose at the base should be secured or re-set as needed. Hall bathroom tub stopper assembly needed to be replaced. Supplemental Information Age of Piping System: Original to home X Completely re-piped Partially re-piped (Provide year and extent of renovation in the comments below: Whole house was re-plumbed in 2015. Water heater was updated in 2013. Type of pipes (check all that apply) Copper PVC/CPVC Galvanized PEX Polybutylene Other (specify) Page 31 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 3 of 11 Page 32 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 4 of 11 Roof (With photos of each roof slope, this section can take the place of the Roof Inspection Form.) Predominant Roof Covering material: Asphalt composition shingle Roof: age (years): Unknown, appears to be 2004 / 2005 Remaining useful life (years): 3-5 years Date of last roofing permit: No permit on file Date of last update: Unknown If updated (check one): Full replacement Partial replacement % of replacement Overall Condition: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory (explain below) Any visible signs of damage / deterioration? (check all that apply and explain below) Cracking Cupping/curling Excessive granule loss Exposed asphalt Exposed felt Missing/loose/cracked tabs or tiles Soft spots in decking Visible hail damage Any visible signs of leaks? Yes No Attic/underside of decking Yes No Interior ceilings Yes No Secondary Roof Covering material: Modified bitumen Roof: age (years): Unknown, appears to be 2004 / 2005 Remaining useful life (years): None Date of last roofing permit: No permit on file Date of last update: Unknown If updated (check one): Full replacement Partial replacement % of replacement Overall Condition: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory (explain below) Any visible signs of damage / deterioration? (check all that apply and explain below) Cracking Cupping/curling Excessive granule loss Exposed asphalt Exposed felt Missing/loose/cracked tabs or tiles Soft spots in decking Loose cap sheet Any visible signs of leaks? Yes No Attic/underside of decking Yes No Interior ceilings Yes No Additional Comments/Observations (use additional pages as needed) No re-roof permits were on file for this property. Extensive remodeling was completed in 2005 including all new wiring and plumbing. Flat roof cap sheet was peeling up / loose at the edges. Wood rot and staining at the soffit on the downhill side, as well as soft spots in the decking, would indicate the flat roof is leaking. All 4-Point Inspection Forms must be completed and signed by a verifiable Florida-licensed inspector. I certify that the above statements are true and correct. Inspector Signature Licensed Home Inspector Title HI 8824 License Number 2/11/2021 Date National Property Inspections Company Name Home Inspector License Type 772-220-1268 Work Phone Page 33 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 5 of 11 Special Instructions: The 4-Point Inspection Form includes the minimum data needed for Underwriting to properly evaluate a property application. While this specific form is not required, any other inspection report submitted for consideration must include at least this level of detail to be acceptable. Photo Requirements Photos must accompany each 4-Point Inspection Form. The minimum photo requirements include: Dwelling: Each side Roof: Each slope Plumbing: Water heater, under cabinet plumbing/drains, exposed valves Open main electrical panel and interior door Electrical box with the panel off All hazards or deficiencies Inspector Requirements To be accepted, all inspection forms must be completed, signed and dated by a verifiable Florida-licensed professional. Examples include: A general, residential, or building contractor A building code inspector A home inspector Note: A trade-specific, licensed professional may sign off only on the inspection form section for their trade. (e.g., an electrician may sign off only on the electrical section of the form.) Documenting the Condition of Each System The Florida-licensed inspector is required to certify the condition of the roof, electrical, HVAC and plumbing systems. Acceptable Condition means that each system is working as intended and there are no visible hazards or deficiencies. Additional Comments or Observations This section of the 4-Point Inspection Form must be completed with full details/descriptions if any of the following are noted on the inspection: Updates: Identify the types of updates, dates completed and by whom Any visible hazards or deficiencies Any system determined not to be in good working order Note to All Agents The writing agent must review each 4-Point Inspection Form before it is submitted with an responsibility to ensure that all rules and requirements are met before the application is bound. Agents may not submit applications for properties with electrical, heating or plumbing systems not in good working order or with existing hazards/deficiencies. Page 34 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 6 of 11 PHOTO PAGE Page 35 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 7 of 11 PHOTO PAGE Page 36 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 8 of 11 PHOTO PAGE Page 37 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 9 of 11 PHOTO PAGE Page 38 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 10 of 11 Photo Page Page 39 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 11 of 11 Photo Page Page 40 of 65 Page 41 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 1 of 8 Insured/Applicant Name: Paul & Linda Jackson Application / Policy #: Address Inspected: 9809 S Indian River Drive, Ft. Pierce, FL. 34982 (Guest House) Actual Year Built: 1953 Date Inspected: 2/11/2021 Minimum Photo Requirements: Dwelling: Each side Roof: Each slope Plumbing: Water heater, under cabinet plumbing/drains, exposed valves Main electrical service panel with interior door label Electrical box with panel off All hazards or deficiencies noted in this report A Florida-licensed inspector must complete, sign and date this form. Be advised that Underwriting will rely on the information in this sample form, or a similar form, that is obtained from the Florida licensed professional of your choice. This information only is used to determine insurability and is not a warranty or assurance of the suitability, fitness or longevity of any of the systems inspected. Electrical System Separate documentation of any aluminum wiring remediation must be provided and certified by a licensed electrician. Main Panel: Type: Circuit breaker Fuse Total Amps: 100 AMP Is amperage sufficient for current usage? Yes No (explain) Second Panel: Type: Circuit breaker Fuse Total Amps: Is amperage sufficient for current usage? Yes No (explain) Indicate presence of any of the following: Cloth wiring Active knob and tube Branch circuit aluminum wiring (If present, describe the usage of all aluminum wiring): *If single strand (aluminum branch) wiring, provide details of all remediation. Separate documentation of all work must be provided. Connections repaired via COPALUM crimp Connections repaired via AlumiConn Hazards Present Blowing fuses Tripping breakers Empty sockets Loose wiring Improper grounding Corrosion Over fusing Double taps Exposed wiring Unsafe wiring Improper breaker size Scorching Other (explain) Incomplete labeling / open knock outs General condition of the electrical system: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory (explain) Double taps, incomplete panel labeling, and open knockouts in the panel should be addressed. Supplemental Information Main Panel Panel age: Unknown Year last updated: 2015 - whole house re-wired Brand/Model: Gould Second Panel Panel age: N/A Year last updated: Brand/Model: Wiring Type Copper MN, BX or Conduit Page 42 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 2 of 8 HVAC System Central AC: Yes No Central heat: Yes No If not central heat, indicate primary heat source and fuel type: Are the heating, ventilation and air conditioning systems in good working order? Yes No (explain) Date of last HVAC servicing/inspection: Unknown Hazards Present Wood-burning stove or central gas fireplace not professionally installed? Yes No Space heater used as primary heat source? Yes No Is the source portable? Yes No Does the air handler/condensate line or drain pan show any signs of blockage or leakage, including water damage to the surrounding area? Yes No Supplemental Information Age of system: 13 years Year last updated: 2008 Plumbing System Is there a temperature pressure relief valve on the water heater? Yes No Is there any indication of an active leak? Yes No Is there any indication of a prior leak? Yes No Water heater location: Interior closet - not fully accessible (behind staacked washer / dryer) General condition of the following plumbing fixtures and connections to appliances: Dishwasher Refrigerator Washing machine Water heater Showers/Tubs Satisfactory Unsatisfactory N/A Toilets Sinks Sump pump Main shut off valve All other visible Satisfactory Unsatisfactory N/A If unsatisfactory, please provide comments/details (leaks, wet/soft spots, mold, corrosion, grout/caulk, etc.) Master bathroom shower apparently leaks around the shower curtain - walls had soft spots on both sides of the shower. Consider installing a full shower door. Supplemental Information Age of Piping System: Original to home X Completely re-piped Partially re-piped (Provide year and extent of renovation in the comments below: Whole house was re-plumbed in 2015. Type of pipes (check all that apply) Copper PVC/CPVC Galvanized PEX Polybutylene Other (specify) Page 43 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 3 of 8 Roof (With photos of each roof slope, this section can take the place of the Roof Inspection Form.) Predominant Roof Covering material: Asphalt composition shingle Roof: age (years): Unknown - appears to be 2004 / 2005 Remaining useful life (years): 3-5 years Date of last roofing permit: No permit on file Date of last update: Unknown If updated (check one): Full replacement Partial replacement % of replacement Overall Condition: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory (explain below) Any visible signs of damage / deterioration? (check all that apply and explain below) Cracking Cupping/curling Excessive granule loss Exposed asphalt Exposed felt Missing/loose/cracked tabs or tiles Soft spots in decking Visible hail damage Any visible signs of leaks? Yes No Attic/underside of decking Yes No No attic access Interior ceilings Yes No Secondary Roof Covering material: Modified bitumen Roof: age (years): Unknown - appears to be 2004 / 2005 Remaining useful life (years): None Date of last roofing permit: No permit on file Date of last update: Unknown If updated (check one): Full replacement Partial replacement % of replacement Overall Condition: Satisfactory Unsatisfactory (explain below) Any visible signs of damage / deterioration? (check all that apply and explain below) Cracking Cupping/curling Excessive granule loss Exposed asphalt Exposed felt Missing/loose/cracked tabs or tiles Soft spots in decking Loose cap sheet Any visible signs of leaks? Yes No Attic/underside of decking Yes No No attic access Interior ceilings Yes No Additional Comments/Observations (use additional pages as needed) No re-roof permits were on file for this property. Extensive remodeling was completed in 2005 including all new wiring and plumbing. Flat roof cap sheet was peeling up / loose at the edges. All 4-Point Inspection Forms must be completed and signed by a verifiable Florida-licensed inspector. I certify that the above statements are true and correct. Inspector Signature Licensed Home Inspector Title HI 8824 License Number 2/11/2021 Date National Property Inspections Company Name Home Inspector License Type 772-220-1268 Work Phone Page 44 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 4 of 8 Special Instructions: The 4-Point Inspection Form includes the minimum data needed for Underwriting to properly evaluate a property application. While this specific form is not required, any other inspection report submitted for consideration must include at least this level of detail to be acceptable. Photo Requirements Photos must accompany each 4-Point Inspection Form. The minimum photo requirements include: Dwelling: Each side Roof: Each slope Plumbing: Water heater, under cabinet plumbing/drains, exposed valves Open main electrical panel and interior door Electrical box with the panel off All hazards or deficiencies Inspector Requirements To be accepted, all inspection forms must be completed, signed and dated by a verifiable Florida-licensed professional. Examples include: A general, residential, or building contractor A building code inspector A home inspector Note: A trade-specific, licensed professional may sign off only on the inspection form section for their trade. (e.g., an electrician may sign off only on the electrical section of the form.) Documenting the Condition of Each System The Florida-licensed inspector is required to certify the condition of the roof, electrical, HVAC and plumbing systems. Acceptable Condition means that each system is working as intended and there are no visible hazards or deficiencies. Additional Comments or Observations This section of the 4-Point Inspection Form must be completed with full details/descriptions if any of the following are noted on the inspection: Updates: Identify the types of updates, dates completed and by whom Any visible hazards or deficiencies Any system determined not to be in good working order Note to All Agents The writing agent must review each 4-Point Inspection Form before it is submitted with an responsibility to ensure that all rules and requirements are met before the application is bound. Agents may not submit applications for properties with electrical, heating or plumbing systems not in good working order or with existing hazards/deficiencies. Page 45 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 5 of 8 PHOTO PAGE Page 46 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 6 of 8 PHOTO PAGE Page 47 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 7 of 8 PHOTO PAGE Page 48 of 65 4-POINT INSPECTION FORM Sample Form Insp4pt 01 18 Page 8 of 8 PHOTO PAGE Page 49 of 65 Page 50 of 65 Page 51 of 65 Page 52 of 65 Page 53 of 65 Page 54 of 65 Page 55 of 65 Page 56 of 65 Potential Motions AFTER CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION DOCUMENTS, STAFF COMMENTS & TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC MEETING AND THE POLCIES SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION 19-201, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO APPROVE THE ARTIFICIAL REEF NAMING REQUEST. AFTER CONSIDERING THE APPLICATION DOCUMENTS, STAFF COMMENTS & TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC MEETING AND THE POLCIES SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION 19-201, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY HISTORICAL COMMISSION FORWARD A RECOMMENDATION TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TO DISAPPROVE THE ARTIFICIAL REEF NAMING REQUEST. Page 57 of 65 Page 58 of 65 Page 59 of 65 Page 60 of 65 Page 61 of 65 Page 62 of 65 Page 63 of 65 Page 64 of 65 10/11/2019 Artificial Reef Program | St. Lucie County, FL https://www.stlucieco.gov/departments-services/a-z/administration/port-of-fort-pierce/artificial-reef-program 1/1 Artificial Reef Program In order to provide better areas to fish and dive and to enhance local fisheries, artificial reefs are being deployed to provide additional hardbottom areas. These reefs have been created using donated heavy concrete and steel materials like culverts, concrete pilings, light poles, and steel vessels. Recent Developments In December 2012 and January 2013, four barges of light poles donated from Florida Power and Light were deployed to create two reefs. The first reef, located in 62-foot depths, had a profile of 27 feet, while the second reef, located in 102-foot depths, had a profile of 25 feet. Post deployment dives on the reefs showed fishes (i.e. triggerfish, black seabass, pelagic baitfish) already utilizing this new habitat. Last April, the St. Lucie County Artificial Reef Program deployed 2,000 tons of concrete and steel materials in two separate locations (150-foot depth, 110-foot depth). Profiles of these reefs were 11 feet and 14 feet, respectively. All of these artificial reefs were deployed with the help of the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission Artificial Reef Construction Grant. The reefs help provide destinations for recreational anglers and divers and habitat for over 110 species of fish and numerous invertebrates. Page 65 of 65