HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 08.20.2020PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
AGENDA
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
Regular Meeting
Thursday, August 20, 2020
6:00 PM
St. Lucie County Commission Chambers
2300 Virginia Avenue
3rd Floor of Roger Poitras Building
Fort Pierce, FL 34982
BOARD MEMBERS
CHAIRMAN
WILLIAM O’DELL
VICE‐CHAIRMAN
JAMES TAYLOR
BOARD MEMBER
CRAIG MUNDT
BOARD MEMBER
VALERIE SLACK
BOARD MEMBER
CRAIG BRIDGERS
BOARD MEMBER
ED LOUNDS
AT‐LARGE BOARD MEMBER
LAWRENCE “BEAU” SLAY
AT‐LARGE BOARD MEMBER
ROBERT LOWE
AT‐LARGE BOARD MEMBER
RYAN BINNER
EX‐OFFICIO BOARD MEMBER
MARTY SANDERS
Mission Statement
To provide service, infrastructure and leadership necessary to advance a safe and sustainable community,
maintain a high quality of life, and protect the natural environment for all our citizens
Page 1 of 107
Regular Meeting Thursday, August 20, 2020 6:00 PM
2 | Page
WELCOME
Please turn off all cellular phones and pagers prior to entering the Commission Chambers.
Please note that the Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency serves in an advisory capacity to the St. Lucie County
Board of County Commissioners and has the power to review and make recommendations to the Board, for approval or
disapproval, on any applications within their area of responsibility.
The Planning and Zoning Commission strongly encourages your input and comment at the public hearing. Please limit comments
to three minutes if possible and be respectful of others’ opinions.
For public convenience, all meetings are televised and are provided with wireless internet access.
NOTICE: All proceedings before the Planning and Zoning Commission / Local Planning Agency of St. Lucie County, Florida, are
electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any recommendation made by the Planning and Zoning Commission /
Local Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the
proceedings. For such purpose, he or she may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, by hiring their
own court reporter at their own expense, to create a record that includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal
is based. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to
the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross‐examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Risk Manager at
least forty‐eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462‐1546 or T.D.D. (772) 462‐1428. Any questions about this agenda
may be referred to St. Lucie County Planning Division at (772) 462‐2822
Page 2 of 107
Regular Meeting Thursday, August 20, 2020 6:00 PM
3 | Page
1.CALL TO ORDER
2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3.INVOCATION
4.ROLL CALL
5.ANNOUNCEMENTS
6.DISCLOSURE(S)
7.MINUTES
A.St. Lucie County Planning & Zoning Commission minutes for the meeting of July 16, 2020.
8.PUBLIC COMMENT
9.PUBLIC HEARINGS
A.All Contractor Services, Inc. ‐ Amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas (Rezoning) from RF
(Religious Facilities) to AG‐2.5 (Agricultural ‐ 2.5) Zoning District.
B.Backyard Chickens Ordinance
10.WORKSHOPS
11.OTHER BUSINESS
12.ADJOURN
Page 3 of 107
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Thursday, July 16, 2020 6:00 PM
1 | P a g e
Present
Excused
Absent
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Regular Meeting
July 16, 2020 Convened: 6:00 PM
Adjourned: 8:14 PM
1.CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Billy O'Dell at 6:00 PM.
2.PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
3.INVOCATION
Led by Chair Billy O'Dell.
4.ROLL CALL
The meeting was called to order at 6:00 PM by Chairman O'Dell
Chairman Billy O'Dell, Vice‐Chairman James A. Taylor, Board Member Bob Lowe, Craig Mundt, Board
Member Ed Lounds, Board Member Ryan Binner, Board Member Valerie Slack
Board Member Craig Bridgers
Board Member Lawrence "Beau" Slay
5.ANNOUNCEMENTS
None.
6.DISCLOSURE(S)
None.
7.MINUTES
A.St. Lucie County Planning & Zoning Commission minutes for the meeting of June 18, 2020
Page 4 of 107
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Thursday, July 16, 2020 6:00 PM
2 | P a g e
APPROVE
Chairman Billy O'Dell
Bob Lowe
Chairman Billy O'Dell, Bob Lowe, Craig Mundt, Ed Lounds, Vice‐
Chairman James A. Taylor, Ryan Binner, Valerie Slack
None
Craig Bridgers
Lawrence "Beau" Slay
RESULT:
MOVER:
SECONDER:
AYES:
NAYS:
EXCUSED:
ABSENT:
APPROVE
Ed Lounds
Bob Lowe
Chairman Billy O'Dell, Craig Mundt, Vice‐Chairman James A. Taylor,
Ryan Binner, Valerie Slack, Bob Lowe, Ed Lounds
None
Craig Bridgers
Lawrence "Beau" Slay
RESULT:
MOVER:
SECONDER:
AYES:
NAYS:
EXCUSED:
ABSENT:
8.PUBLIC COMMENT
None.
9.PUBLIC HEARINGS
A.All Contractor Services, Inc. ‐ Amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas (Rezoning) from RF
(Religious Facilities) to AG‐2.5 (Agricultural ‐ 2.5) Zoning District.
Presentation presented by Kori Benton Planning & Development Assistant Manager
Property located at SE corner of Okeechobee Road and Eleven Mile Road was dually
noticed this evening notification letters were provided to owners with properties within
500 feet ad published on newspaper as well as a sign posted on the property. As of today,
the applicant's representative, Dennis Murphy of Culpepper & Terpening Inc., are
requesting that this commission authorize a continuance to the August 20, 2020 meeting of
the Planning and Zoning Commission.
B.Creating Section 8.02.02(L), Special Public Events Sites
Presentation by Assistant County Attorney III Katherine Barbieri.
Request creating a new section to land development code. On 12‐4‐2018 the BOCC
Page 5 of 107
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Thursday, July 16, 2020 6:00 PM
3 | P a g e
adopted ordinance 18.013 which amended the land development code temporary uses by
many requirements are paragraph J authorizing special vehicles, recreational vehicles,
motor and boat sales events on site that was in response to a complaint about sales and
the effects they had on the neighbors, the properties etc.. It also caused where the
Community Development Director now the P&Z Director could not approve special public
events on properties like the Fair Grounds. This has prevented special events expositions
from taking place in St. Lucie County such as outdoor shows, trade shows etc. Like if you
had an event for an outdoor show they would have boats, RV sales and all the things
needed for that, we could not have that at the Fairgrounds right now because of the
amendment. So we are proposing a new section 8.02.02(L) that would allow special events
on properties that have enough room for it, that can accommodate to solve the complaints
for outdoor restrooms. One of them would be the Fairgrounds and instead of providing all
the parameters, this time what we are proposing is that we would allow it and then by
resolution to the BOCC we would create the parameters for it. We have been looking into
the Palm Beach County that allows it, they require a permit and have parameters set. No
opposition at the time. We are proposing that you forward the recommendation of
approval to the BOCC.
Chairman O'Dell requested comments from fellow chair members. There were none.
Chair O'Dell requested comments from the Public. There were none
Comment made by Mr. Lowe: Believes this will help the county and create large events.
APPROVE
Bob Lowe
Craig Mundt
Chairman Billy O'Dell, Bob Lowe, Craig Mundt, Ed Lounds, Vice‐
Chairman James A. Taylor, Ryan Binner, Valerie Slack,
None
Craig Bridgers
Lawrence "Beau" Slay
RESULT:
MOVER:
SECONDER:
AYES:
NAYS:
EXCUSED:
ABSENT:
C.Local Planning Agency Hearing: Comprehensive Plan Text Amendment ‐ Policy 11.1.4.9 ‐
Workforce Housing Affordability to reduce the minimum workforce housing affordability
maintenance period within the Towns, Villages, and the Countryside (TVC) Element.
Presentation made by Jodi Nentwick Senior Planner for P&Z and Kara Woods , P& Z
Consultant.
Next three items combined in presentation because it is from the same applicant. The first
(C.) is a Comprehensive Plan Amendment, (D.) is an amendment to the land development
code and lastly (E.) Rezoning request and Site plan. Mailings and postings were made.
Amendment is for policy about housing affordability. Requires for the property to have this
in place for 20 yrs. The applicant proposes it to be reduced to 8 yrs.
Are primarily in Chapter 2. change the minimum/maximum for front yard from 20/30 feet
to 5/25 feet. The next was to mimic the request in agenda item C. to reduce it from 25 yrs.
To 8 yrs. Approval process changes for timeframes. Came about because of this large
Page 6 of 107
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Thursday, July 16, 2020 6:00 PM
4 | P a g e
APPROVE
Bob Lowe
Craig Mundt
Chairman Billy O'Dell, Bob Lowe, Craig Mundt, Ed Lounds, Vice‐
Chairman James A. Taylor, Ryan Binner, Valerie Slack,
None
Craig Bridgers
Lawrence "Beau" Slay
RESULT:
MOVER:
SECONDER:
AYES:
NAYS:
EXCUSED:
ABSENT
application. Request for changes also include the changes in when some of the required
items are submitted to allow for the developers to begin and submit those items such as
surveys towards the time of final plan approval. Section 4 is last to change the detached
garage verbiage. Kara Woods paused at this time for questions. Chairman O'Dell requested
comments from fellow chair members. Chairman O'Dell asked regarding 5ft setbacks if they
are considered front loaded. Ms. Woods clarified that the 5ft setbacks have to do with the
distance from house to street and the front loaded garage are different. Having to do with
walkability. Questions came up from other members regarding the setback changes and
conversation with staff. Ms. Woods clarified that it is for a house lot to change it to be more
urban. Parking options are ensured by within the lots and on street. The codes control
parking by where it is in the neighborhood. It was reassured that the applicant is complying
with illustrations in the code for garages. Questions from members also came up regarding
water on the property. The applicant invested to bring water to the land and will be using
St. Lucie County water. Another question came up regarding the 8 vs. 25 years affordability
timeframe change. The impact would be to improve the value of the home sooner rather
than later. Suggested to include the word minimum for the 8 years amendment. Ms.
Woods noted to look into the change. Ms. Kara Woods stated that the timeframe change is
valid to be reconsidered based on where we are as a county in 2020.
Chairman O'Dell requested comments from the Public for item C. There were none. Public
hearing closed. Chairman O'Dell requested comments from fellow chair members for item
C.Ms. Woods would like to wait until the applicant makes there presentation before
putting the items up for vote individually. After the chairman received clarification on the
voting format they proceeded with Ms. Woods presentation regarding transect plan and
application. Over 25 years in 4 phases. After staff presentation for item C. questions were
opened to the members and it was stated that there will be land for a school and Fire
Station and is taken into consideration by those boards for the long term as needed. It Is
approximately 836 acres large as stated by Ms. Woods.
D.Text Amendment to the Land Development Code, Section 3.01.03.EE ‐ PTV (Planned Town or
Village) Zoning District and Section 4.04.00. ‐ TVC (Towns, Villages, Countryside), to increased
flexibility in Development Standards and Review Process for PTV Zoning within the TVC Overlay
Zone.
Chairman O'Dell requested comments from the Public. There were none and was closed.
Page 7 of 107
Planning & Zoning Commission Meeting Thursday, July 16, 2020 6:00 PM
5 | P a g e
APPROVE
Vice‐Chairman James A. Taylor
Craig Mundt
Chairman Billy O'Dell, Bob Lowe, Craig Mundt, Ed Lounds, Vice‐
Chairman James A. Taylor, Ryan Binner, Valerie Slack
None
Craig Bridgers
Lawrence "Beau" Slay
RESULT:
MOVER:
SECONDER:
AYES:
NAYS:
EXCUSED:
ABSENT:
E.Indrio & I‐95 Development, LLC. ‐ Amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas (Rezoning) from
Agricultural‐1 (AG‐1) Zoning District to the Planned Town or Village (PTV) Zoning District, and
authorize a Preliminary Planned Town or Village to be known as Indrio & I‐95 Development.
Chairman O'Dell requested comments from the Public. There were none and was closed.
10.WORKSHOPS
None.
11.OTHER BUSINESS
Mr. Lounds commented about the fact that there has been little public input and recommended that
the board and staff watch the project closely. This is how future developments will follow.
Chair O'Dell stated that notice for might be more difficult in this rural area and Ms. Nentwick assured
that the negative commentator saw the sign on the road.
12.ADJOURN
Move to Adjourn by Mr. Lounds and was adjourned by the Chairman O’Dell at 8:14 PM.
Page 8 of 107
ITEM NO.(ID # 2020-50009)
DATE:8/20/2020
AGENDA REQUEST
TO:Planning and Zoning Commission
PRESENTED BY:Tahir Curry, Associate Planner
SUBMITTED BY:Planning & Development Services
SUBJECT:All Contractor Services, Inc. - Amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas (Rezoning)
from RF (Religious Facilities) to AG-2.5 (Agricultural - 2.5) Zoning District.
BACKGROUND:
The petitioner, Jamie Difrancesco is requesting an Amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas for a change in zoning (Rezoning) from
the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District to the AG-2.5 (Agricultural - 2.5) Zoning District for a 6.65-acre property on the Southeast
corner of Okeechobee Road and Eleven Mile Road, at 11275 Okeechobee Road.
Staff received a Code Enforcement complaint on the subject property for unauthorized construction of a structure onsite. The
subsequent inspection found violations including outside storage, unpermitted accessory structures, cargo containers, placement of
a mobile home, and overgrowth.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
This item was continued to the August 20, 2020, Planning & Zoning Meeting.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission forward a recommendation of approval for the
Rezoning from RF to AG-1 to the Board of County Commissioners.
COMMISSION ACTION:
RESULT:
MOVER:None
SECONDER:None
AYES:None
Page 9 of 107
NAYS:None
EXCUSED:None
Coordination/Signatures
Date: August 14, 2020
Benjamin Balcer, Planning & Development Services Assistant
Director
Date: August 17, 2020
Leslie Olson, Planning & Development Services Director
Date: August 17, 2020
Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney
Date: August 18, 2020
Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator
Page 10 of 107
Planning Division Agenda Item Summary
Applicant/Property Owner
Jamie Difrancesco All Contractor Services, Inc. 1742 SE Lorraine Street
Port St. Lucie, FL 34952
Agent Dennis Murphy Culpepper & Terpening, Inc.
2980 South 25th Street
Fort Pierce, FL 34981
Project Location
11275 Okeechobee Road
Fort Pierce, FL 34945
Parcel ID# 2328-501-0001-000-8
Future Land Use
RU (Residential Urban)
Existing Zoning RF (Religious Facilities)
Proposed Zoning
AG-2.5 (Agricultural – 2.5)
Staff Tahir Curry
Tel 772-462-2515 Email CurryT@stlucieco.org Mail 2300 Virginia Avenue,
Fort Pierce, Florida 34982
All Contractor Services, Inc
Amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas (Rezoning)
Religious Facilities to Agricultural - 2.5
Project Description The petitioner, Jamie Difrancesco is re-questing an Amendment to the Official
Zoning Atlas for a change in zoning
(Rezoning) from the RF (Religious Facil-
ities) Zoning District to the AG-2.5 (Agricultural - 2.5) Zoning District for a
6.65-acre property on the Southeast
corner of Okeechobee Road and Eleven
Mile Road, at 11275 Okeechobee Road.
Background On May 16, 2000, the St. Lucie County
Board of County Commissioners ap-
proved Resolution 00-024, granting a
change in zoning from AG-2.5 (Agricultural - 2.5) to the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District for the subject
property.
The purpose of the Agricultural – 2.5 is to provide and protect an environment suit-
able for productive commercial agricul-
ture, together with such other uses as
may be necessary to and compatible with productive agricultural surroundings.
Notice Requirements Public hearing notice in accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the Land Develop-
ment Code was placed in the St. Lucie
News Tribune on July 2, 2020, letters
were mailed to property owners within a 500 foot radius, and a sign posted on the
property.
Staff’s Recommendation
Forward this petition to the Board
of County Commissioners with a rec-commendation for approval.
Hearing Date
Thursday
July 16, 2020
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
Page 11 of 107
Planning and Development
Services Department
Planning Division
M E M O R A N D U M
GENERAL INFORMATION
Applicant/
Property Owner:Jamie Difrancesco
All Contractor Services, Inc.
1742 SE Lorraine Street
Port Saint Lucie, FL 34952
Agent: Dennis Murphy
Culpepper & Terpening, Inc.
2980 S. 25th Street
Fort Pierce, FL 34981
Location:11275 Okeechobee Road, Fort Pierce, FL 34945. Southeast corner of
Okeechobee Road and Eleven Mile Road.
Parcel ID Number:2328-501-0001-000-8
Parcel Size: 6.65-acres
Future Land Use:RE (Residential Estate)
Existing Zoning:RF (Religious Facilities)
Proposed Zoning:AG-2.5 (Agricultural – 1du/2.5ac)
Requested Action:Change in zoning from RF (Religious Facilities) to AG-2.5 (Agricultural –
1du/2.5ac)
Existing Uses: Undeveloped
Urban Service
Boundary: Outside
Fire/EMS:Station # 11 – 3501 Shinn Road, Fort Pierce, Florida 34945. Approximately 4.3
miles to the east of the subject site.
TO:Planning and Zoning Commission
THROUGH:Leslie Olson, AICP, Director
Ben Balcer, Assistant Director
FROM:Tahir Curry, Associate Planner
DATE:July 2, 2020
SUBJECT:All Contractor Services, Inc.
Amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas (Rezoning)
RZ-5202025754
Page 12 of 107
Petition: All Contractor Services, Inc. – Rezoning
File No.: RZ-5202025754
Page 2
Right-of-Way:Okeechobee Road is a State owned and maintained right-of-way.
Eleven Mile Road is a 45 ft. County owned and maintained right-of-way.
Utilties: St. Lucie County Utilities (SLCU) service area. Water and wastewater
infrastructure exists approximately 700 feet east of subject property.
Type of Concurrency
Document Required: Concurrency Deferral Affidavit
BACKGROUND ANALYSIS
The applicant, Jamie Difrancesco representing All Contractor Services, Inc., is requesting an Amendment to
the Official Zoning Atlas from the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District to the AG-2.5 (Agricultural – 2.5)
Zoning District for this 6.65-acres site located at 11275 Okeechobee Road, Fort Pierce, FL. The Future Land
Use designation is RE (Residential Estate), situated outside of the Urban Service Boundary (USB).
Previous Actions
o On May 16, 2000 - The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution 00-
024, granting a change in zoning from the AG-2.5 (Agricultural - 2.5) to the RF (Religious Facilities)
Zoning District for the subject property.
The purpose of the rezone is to develop consistent with the Land Development Code (LDC) Section 3.01.03.B.
for the AG-2.5 Zoning District. This petition will rezone the property back to the AG-2.5 Zoning District that
existed prior to May 16, 2000.
Aerial
Page 13 of 107
Petition: All Contractor Services, Inc. – Rezoning
File No.: RZ-5202025754
Page 3
Proposed Rezoning
AG-2.5 (Agricultural - 2.5)
Future Land Use:
Okeechobee Road
El
ev
en
Mi
le
Ro
ad
Page 14 of 107
Petition: All Contractor Services, Inc. – Rezoning
File No.: RZ-5202025754
Page 4
The Future Land Use designation of the subject property is RE (Residential Estate). The Residential Estate
(RE) land use category “is intended to act as a transitional area between the agricultural areas and the more
intense residential areas in the eastern portion of the County. This category is found predominantly along the
western edge of the urban form, but is also appropriate for areas of special environmental concern such as
along the North Fork of the St. Lucie River and the Indian River Lagoon. The RE designation is intended for
large lot, single-family detached residential dwellings, at a density of one unit per gross acre. These areas are
not required to be served with central utilities, however when at all practical, service connections should be
provided.”
Current Zoning:
The current zoning of the subject property is RF (Religious Facilities). “The purpose of this District is to
provide and protect an environment suitable for the establishment and operation of churches, synagogues,
temples, and similar uses.”
Proposed Zoning:
The proposed zoning of the subject property is AG-2.5 (Agricultural-2.5). “The purpose of this district is to
provide and protect an environment suitable for productive commercial agriculture, together with such other
uses as may be necessary to and compatible with productive agricultural surroundings.”
**********************************************
STANDARDS OF REVIEW
AS SET FORTH IN THE LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE SECTION 11.06.03
In reviewing this application for an amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas, the Board of County
Commissioners and the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following
determinations:
A.Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land
Development Code;
The proposed rezoning to the AG-2.5 (Agricultural-2.5) Zoning District is consistent with the St. Lucie County
Land Development Code (LDC), and meeting Standards of Review set forth in LDC Section 11.06.03, as
displayed in Sections A thru H of this report. The rezoning is consistent with LDC Section 11.09.02(A), Table
11-1 - Zoning District/ Land Use Category Compatibility Chart and the site meets the dimensional
requirements set forth in Section 7.04.00 and Table 7-10 – Lot Size and Dimensional Requirements for the
AG-2.5 (Agricultural-2.5) Zoning District.
The proposed AG-2.5 Zoning District is consistent with surrounding parcels, providing the use scope in LDC
Section 3.01.03.B and District purpose.
B. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County
Comprehensive Plan;
The proposed rezoning to the AG-2.5 (Agricultural-2.5) Zoning District is consistent with the Residential
Estate Future Land Use designation as per Comprehensive Plan Table 1-3 - Land Use Designation / Zoning
Compatibility Chart.
Table 1-3 - Land Use Designation / Zoning Compatibility Chart
Page 15 of 107
Petition: All Contractor Services, Inc. – Rezoning
File No.: RZ-5202025754
Page 5
Future Land Use CategoriesZoning
Districts
AG
-
5
AG
-
2
.
5
RE RS RU RM RH R/
C
Cp
u
b
CO
M
IN
D
P/
F
MX
D
SD H T/
U
TV
C
AG-2.5 X X X X X X
The proposed amendment is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Future Land Use Element Goals,
Objectives and Policies:
Objective 1.1.3: Agricultural Sustainability. Provide in the Land Development Code provisions for a
compatible and coordinated land use pattern which establishes agriculture as the primary use outside of the
urban service boundary and promotes retention of agricultural activities, preserves natural resources and
maintains native vegetative habitats and allows new development in accordance with the Towns, Villages and
Countryside Goals, Objectives and Policies for settlement outside of the urban service boundary within the
Special Area Plan for North St. Lucie County.
Policy 1.1.3.4 - Provide the means to manage growth within the agricultural land use categories
through the orderly delivery of services concurrent with the impacts of development. It is anticipated
that over time portions of the agricultural land use categories will be converted to urban uses as
services are provided; however, , the physical extension of County provided central sewer and water
services shall only occur consistent with the other provisions of this Plan.
Policy 1.1.3.5 - The County shall maintain a site assessment process to evaluate the potential
conversion of existing or designated agricultural land uses to non-agricultural land uses in a rational
and orderly manner. The site assessment process for a conversion shall require as a condition to such
conversion that the Board of County Commissioners affirmatively find that the proposed non-
agricultural use.
a. Is compatible with adjacent land uses;
b. Maintains the viability of continued agricultural uses on adjacent lands;
c. Contains soils suitable for urban use as defined by the St. Lucie County soil survey;
d. Is suitable with existing site-specific land characteristics;
e. Is consistent with comprehensive development plans;
f. Will have available the necessary infrastructure concurrent with the anticipated demands
for development;
g. Will avoid the extension of the urban services boundary to create any enclaves, pockets, or
finger areas; and,
h. Could not be feasibly located on non-agricultural land.
C. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed
land uses;
The proposed rezoning is consistent with the existing and proposed land uses. As stated above, the AG-2.5
(Agricultural – 2.5) Zoning District is compatible with the RE (Residential Estate) Future Land Use designation
as per both the Land Development Code (LDC) and the Comprehensive Plan. This amendment will not create
a conflict with the surrounding zoning districts.
Surrounding Land Use and Zoning
Page 16 of 107
Petition: All Contractor Services, Inc. – Rezoning
File No.: RZ-5202025754
Page 6
Future Land Use Zoning Existing Use(s)
Subject Property RE (Residential Estate)RF (Religious Facilities)Vacant Property
North RE (Residential Estate)AG-2.5 (Agricultural-2.5)Vacant Building
South RE (Residential Estate)AG-2.5 (Agricultural-2.5)Single-Family Residence
East RE (Residential Estate)AG-2.5 (Agricultural-2.5)Hattie Chamberlain
Subdivision
West AG-2.5 (Agricultural-
2.5)
AG-2.5 (Agricultural-2.5)Single-Family Residence
D. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment;
The applicant has purchased the property with intent for future agricultural use(s) and a single-family residence
consistent with the LDC Section 3.01.03.B. There have been no changes in the existing conditions to require
the proposed amendment.
E. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities,
and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public
facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks,
drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities;
The proposed change in zoning should not affect the acceptable level of service capacity of transportation
facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, or emergency
medical facilities. Site-specific impacts will be addressed through a development application. Prior to the
issuance of any final Development Order, the developer must demonstrate that all public facilities are available
to serve the parcel and obtain a Certificate of Capacity. The applicant has signed the required Concurrency
Deferral Affidavit recognizing this provision.
Water/Wastewater
Water and wastewater services are available to the site from Okeechobee Road and may be provided by St.
Lucie County Utilities (SLCU) if desired or required. Water and wastewater infrastructure exists approximately
700’ east of this property.
Transportation Impacts
The subject site has frontage on Okeechobee Road and Eleven Mile Road. Okeechobee Road is a State owned
and maintained right-of-way and Eleven Mile Road is a 45 ft. County owned and maintained right-of-way.
The County will not require Right-of-Way dedication with this petition. No additional transportation impacts
are anticipated at this time. Future development on this subject site will be evaluated for traffic or transportation
impacts based on the proposed petition.
F. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts
on the natural environment;
Background
The Environmental Resources Department (ERD) is in receipt of the May 22, 2020, date-stamped submittal
from Planning and Development Services. The applicant is requesting approval to change the zoning of the
Page 17 of 107
Petition: All Contractor Services, Inc. – Rezoning
File No.: RZ-5202025754
Page 7
subject parcel (Parcel ID 2328-501-0001-000-8) from RF to AG-2.5. The 6.65-acre site is located at 11275
Okeechobee Rd in Fort Pierce. The site is currently vacant has a land use code of 9900.
Findings
The proposed rezoning is not anticipated to result in any adverse environmental impacts, as no development
activities are proposed at this time and no increase in density is proposed. If site development activities are
proposed in the future, ERD will conduct further review through the site plan or building permit review process.
Recommendation
ERD has no objection to the approval of the referenced rezone application.
G. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical
development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns;
The proposed change in zoning will result in an orderly and logical development pattern. The proposed parcel
is located outside the urban service area, with existing agricultural and residential uses surrounding the parcel.
The requested rezone is not expected to harm other property or improvements in the neighborhood. This rezone
petition will revert the property to the AG-2.5 Zoning District. The surrounding properties within 500 feet of
the subject site are zoned Agricultural-2.5. This petition will not negatively affect the development patterns in
the surrounding area.
H. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with
the purpose and intent of this Code;
The proposed zoning district is not in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and
intent of the Land Development Code.
CONCLUSION:
Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms to the Standards of Review as set forth in
Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is consistent with the St. Lucie County
Comprehensive Plan Goals, Objectives, and Policies .
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends that the Planning and Zoning Commission forward a recommendation of approval to the
Board of County Commissioners.
Page 18 of 107
Resolution No. 2020-XXX
Page 1 RZ 5202025754
RESOLUTION NO. 2020-XXX
File No.: RZ 5202025754
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF
ST. LUCIE COUNTY GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE RF
(RELIGIOUS FACILITIES) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE AG-2.5
(AGRICULTURAL - 2.5) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A PROPERTY
LOCATED IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the
testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following
determinations:
1.Jamie Difrancesco on behalf of All Contractor Services, Inc., petitioned for an Amendment
to the Official Zoning Atlas to change the zoning from the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning
District to the AG-2.5 (Agricultural -2.5) Zoning District in St. Lucie County, Florida, for the
property legally described in Paragraph “A” and depicted on the attached map as Exhibit
“A”.
2.On July 16, 2020, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public
hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and
notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and
recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve/deny the change in
zoning from the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District to the AG-2.5 (Agricultural -2.5)
Zoning District.
3.On August 4, 2020, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice
at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500
feet of the subject property.
4.The proposed change in zoning has/has not satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.03
of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is/is not consistent with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan.
5.The proposed change in zoning is/is not consistent with the existing and proposed use of
property in the surrounding area.
6. A Concurrency Deferral Affidavit, a copy which is attached to this Resolution as Exhibit
“B” was signed by the applicant on May 19, 2020.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
County, Florida:
A.The property on which the Change in Zoning from the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning
Page 19 of 107
Resolution No. 2020-XXX
Page 2 RZ 5202025754
District to the AG-2.5 (Agricultural-2.5) Zoning District is being granted/denied is described
as follows:
Legal Description:
TRACT 1, LESS THE SOUTH 883.44 FEET THEREOF, AND TRACT 2, LESS THE
SOUTH 883.44 FEET THEREOF, ALL IN H.E. CHAMBERLAIN SUBDIVISION, IN
SECTION 28, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, AS PER PLAT THEREOF,
RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 4, PAGE 55, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE
COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR OKEECHOBEE ROAD (S.R. 70),
BY AGREED ORDER OF TAKING RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 777, PAGE 81, OF THE
PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
CONTAINING 6.65 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
Location: 11275 Okeechobee Road, Fort Pierce, FL 34945.
Parcel ID: 2328-501-0001-000-8
B.The St. Lucie County Planning and Development Services Director shall be authorized to
amend the Official Zoning Map to change the zoning of the property herein described,
from the RF (Religious Facilities) Zoning District to the AG-2.5 (Agricultural-2.5) Zoning
District and to make notation of the reference to the date of adoption of this Resolution.
C.A copy of this Resolution shall be mailed, return receipt requested, to the owner and agent
of record as identified on the application.
D.This Resolution shall be recorded in the Public Records.
After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows:
Cathy Townsend, Chair XXX
Chris Dzadovsky, Vice-Chair XXX
Commissioner Sean Mitchell XXX
Commissioner Linda Bartz XXX
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX
Page 20 of 107
Resolution No. 2020-XXX
Page 3 RZ 5202025754
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 4th day of August 2020.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY _________________________
Chair
ATTEST:APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND CORRECTNESS:
___________________________________________________
Deputy Clerk County Attorney
Page 21 of 107
Resolution No. 2020-XXX
Page 4 RZ 5202025754
Exhibit A
Page 22 of 107
Resolution No. 2020-XXX
Page 5 RZ 5202025754
Exhibit B
Page 23 of 107
Suggested motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested change in zoning.
MOTION TO APPROVE:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING,
INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN
SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE
THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE
COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT APPROVAL TO THE
APPLICATION OF All Contractor Services, INC. FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE RF
(RELIGIOUS FACILITIES) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE AG-2.5 (AGRICULTURAL –
1DU/2.5AC) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A 6.65-ACRE LOCATED AT 11275 OKEECHOBEE
ROAD IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA., BECAUSE.....
[CITE REASON(S) WHY – PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]
MOTION TO DENY:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING,
INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPLICATION OF All Contractor Services, INC.
FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE RF (RELIGIOUS FACILITIES) ZONING DISTRICT TO
THE AG-2.5 (AGRICULTURAL – 1DU/2.5AC) ZONING DISTRICT FOR A 6.65-ACRE
LOCATED AT 11275 OKEECHOBEE ROAD IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BECAUSE.....
[CITE REASON(S) WHY – PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]
Page 24 of 107
Page 25 of 107
Page 26 of 107
Page 27 of 107
Page 28 of 107
Page 29 of 107
Page 30 of 107
Page 31 of 107
Page 32 of 107
Page 33 of 107
Page 34 of 107
Rezoning/Amendment to the
Official Zoning Atlas Application Supplement
Refer to St Lucie County Land Development Code (LDC) Section 11.06.00 for details
Current Zoning: RF (Religious Facility) Current Future Land Use RE
Proposed Zoning: AG 2.5 (Agriculture - .4 du/ac) Acreage of the Area To Be Rezoned: 6.65
Please provide a written description of the proposed development including statements about:
1. If you are requesting an amendment to the Official Zoning Atlas of St. Lucie County, state whether
the proposed amendment is in conflict with any portions of the LDC.
The request for Change in Zoning to the AG 2.5 (Agriculture - .4 du/ac) is for the purpose of
reclassifying the property to a zoning district consistent with the areas adjacent properties. The
current zoning designation of RF (Religious Facilities) was a use specific zoning designation that was
sought by a prior property owner for a use/activity that did not move to the development stage.
The RF Zoning District only permitted use is for certain religious use facilities. Reclassifying the
property to the AG-2.5 zoning district would permit uses/activities consistent with the surrounding
area.
2. Please give a statement describing any changed conditions that would justify a rezoning:
The petitioned property was first reclassified from the AG-2.5 Zoning District to the RF (Religious
Facility) Zoning District in the year 2000, through Resolution 00-024. The objective of the
petitioner at that time was to reclassify the property from its agricultural designation to a zoning
designation that would permit the future use of the property for uses/activities associated with
the projected expansion of the worship and educational facilities associated with the Orange
Avenue Baptist Church, consistent with the provisions of Section 3.03.03(Y) of the St. Lucie County
Land Development Code. The original petitioners seeking the RF Zoning designation never
proceeded with the indicated development plans for the property, and sold the property in 20xx.
Subsequently, the petition property was sold to the current owner (the current petitioner) in 20xx.
Reclassifying the property to the AG-2.5 zoning district would permit uses/activities consistent
with the surrounding area
3. Please state why there is a need for the proposed rezoning:
The request for Change in Zoning to the AG 2.5 (Agriculture - .4 du/ac) is for the purpose of
reclassifying the property to a zoning district consistent with the areas adjacent properties. The
current zoning designation of RF (Religious Facilities) was a use specific zoning designation that was
sought by a prior property owner for a use/activity that did not move to the development stage.
The RF Zoning Districts only permitted use is for certain religious use facilities. Reclassifying the
property to the AG-2.5 zoning district would permit uses/activities consistent with the surrounding
area.
Page 35 of 107
Page 36 of 107
Page 37 of 107
Page 38 of 107
Page 39 of 107
Page 40 of 107
Page 41 of 107
Page 42 of 107
Page 43 of 107
Page 44 of 107
Page 45 of 107
Page 46 of 107
C. AG-5 AGRICULTURAL - 5.
1. Purpose. The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for
productive commercial agriculture, together with such other uses as may be necessary to and
compatible with productive agricultural surroundings. Residential densities are restricted to a
maximum of one (1) dwelling unit per five (5) gross acres. The number in "( )" following each
identified use corresponds to the SIC Code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The
number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC Code but may be further defined in
Section 2.00.00 of this Code.
2. Permitted Uses:
a. Agricultural production - crops. (01)
b. Agricultural production - livestock and animal specialties. (02)
c. Agricultural services. (07)
d. Family day care homes. (999)
e. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of
one thousand (1,000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided
that the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS)
notifies the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home
is licensed by HRS. (999)
f. Fishing, hunting and trapping. (09)
g. Forestry. (08)
h. Kennels. (0752)
i. Research facilities, noncommercial. (8733)
j. Riding stables. (7999)
k. Single-family detached dwellings. (999)
l. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23. (999)
3. Lot Size Requirements. Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
4. Dimensional Regulations. Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section
7.04.00.
5. Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. Off-street parking and loading requirements are
subject to Section 7.06.00.
6. Landscaping Requirements. Landscaping Requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00.
7. Conditional Uses:
a. Agricultural labor housing. (999)
b. Aircraft storage and equipment maintenance. (4581)
c. Airports and flying, landing, and take-off fields. (4581)
d. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1,000) feet of another
such family residential home. (999)
e. Farm products warehousing and storage. (4221/4222)
f. Gasoline service stations. (5541)
g. Industrial wastewater disposal. (999)
h. Manufacturing:
Page 47 of 107
k. Single-family detached dwellings. (999)
3. Lot Size Requirements. Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
4. Dimensional Regulations. Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section
7.04.00.
5. Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. Off-street parking and loading requirements are
subject to Section 7.06.00.
6. Landscaping Requirements. Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00
7. Conditional Uses:
a. Agricultural labor housing. (999)
b. Aircraft storage and equipment maintenance. (4581)
c. Airports and flying, landing, and takeoff fields. (4581)
d. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1,000) feet of another
such family residential home. (999)
e. Farm products warehousing and storage. (4221/4222)
f. Gasoline service stations. (5541)
g. Industrial wastewater disposal. (999)
h. Manufacturing:
(1) Agricultural chemicals. (287)
(2) Food and kindred products. (20)
(3) Lumber and wood products, except furniture. (24)
i. Mining and quarrying of nonmetallic minerals, except fuels. (14)
j. Radio, television, and microwave communication stations and towers. (999)
k. Retail trade:
(1) Farm equipment and related accessories. (999)
(2) Apparel and accessory stores. (56)
l. Sewage disposal subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.13. (999)
m. Camps - sporting and recreational. (7032)
n. Outdoor shooting ranges, providing site plan approval is obtained according to the
provisions of Sections 11.02.07 through 11.02.09 and Section 7.10.19 of this Code.
o. Solar generation station subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.28. (999)
8. Accessory Uses: Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and
include the following:
a. Mobile homes subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.05.
b. Retail trade and wholesale trade - subordinate to the primary authorized use or activity.
c. Guest house subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.04. (999)
d. Solar energy system subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.28. (999)
Page 48 of 107
Y. RF RELIGIOUS FACILITIES.
1. Purpose. The purpose of this District is to provide and protect an environment suitable for the
establishment and operation of churches, synagogues, temples, and similar uses. The number
in "( )" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC Code reference described in
Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC Code but may
be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this Code.
2. Permitted Uses:
a. Churches, synagogues, temples, and similar uses. (999)
3. Lot Size Requirements. Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
4. Dimensional Regulations. Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section
7.04.00.
5. Off-Street Parking and Loading Requirements. Off-street parking and loading requirements are
subject to Section 7.06.00.
6. Landscaping Requirements. Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00.
7. Conditional Uses:
a. Day care facilities, associated and operated by the principal religious use located on that
property. This would include the operation of a day care facility during the normal business
week, as licensed by the State of Florida, as well as during any religious function or
associated activity. (999)
b. Educational services, associated with and operated by the principal religious use located
on that property. This would include the operation of an educational facility providing
general academic and/or special training from grades K to 12, and as licensed by the State
of Florida. (999)
c. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23. (999)
8. Accessory Uses. Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and
include the following:
a. Parking lots and parking areas, together with related circulation elements.
b. Enclosed storage structures.
c. Playgrounds and athletic fields (no artificial lights) provided that no activity area shall be
permitted within twenty-five (25) feet of the perimeter of the property.
d. Private water and sewage utility services provided that they are for the sole use of the
particular private development, are not intended to be a sub-regional system, and do not
involve industrial wastewater as defined.
e. Single-family dwelling (detached or as part of the principal structure).
(1) Private swimming pool accessory to the single-family dwelling provided that the
swimming pools shall be walled or fenced to prevent uncontrolled access to such
swimming pool from the street or from adjacent properties.
(2) Non-commercial garages accessory to the single-family dwelling.
f. Solar energy systems, subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.28.
Page 49 of 107
Page 50 of 107
Page 51 of 107
Page 52 of 107
Page 53 of 107
Environmental resources
FINAL REPORT
TO:Tahir Curry, Planning & Development Services Department
THROUGH:Amy E. Griffin, Environmental Resources Director
Jennifer L. McGee, Environmental Regulations Manager
FROM:Brian Arbeiter, Environmental Planner
DATE:June 10, 2020
SUBJECT:All Contractor Services, Inc.
RZ-5202025754
Background
The Environmental Resources Department (ERD) is in receipt of the May 22, 2020 date-stamped submittal from
Planning and Development Services. The applicant is requesting approval to change the zoning of the subject parcel
(Parcel ID 2328-501-0001-000-8) from RF to AG-2.5. The 6.65-acre site is located at 11275 Okeechobee Rd in
Fort Pierce. The site is currently vacant has a land use code of 9900.
Findings
The proposed rezoning is not anticipated to result in any adverse environmental impacts, as no development
activities are proposed at this time and no increase in density is proposed. If site development activities are proposed
in the future, ERD will conduct further review through the site plan or building permit review process.
Recommendation
ERD has no objection to the approval of the referenced rezone application.
Please contact Brian Arbeiter at 772-462-2866 if you have any questions.
Page 54 of 107
Date Mailed July 2, 2020
Planning and Development Services Department 772.462. 2822
Applicant/Property Owner
Jamie Difrancesco
All Contractor Services, Inc. 1742 SE Lorraine Street Port St. Lucie, FL 34952
Agent
Dennis Murphy Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. 2980 South 25th Street
Fort Pierce, FL 34981
Project Location 11275 Okeechobee Road Fort Pierce, FL 34945
Parcel ID#
2328-501-0001-000-8
Future Land Use
RU (Residential Urban)
Existing Zoning RF (Religious Facilities)
Proposed Zoning
AG-2.5 (Agricultural – 2.5)
Staff’s Recommendation
Forward this petition to the Board of
County Commissioners with a recom-
mendation for approval.
Staff Tahir Curry
Tel 772-462-2515
Email CurryT@stlucieco.org
Mail 2300 Virginia Avenue,
Fort Pierce, Florida 34982
Public Hearing Notice
Thursday, July 16, 2020
Notice of Proposed Amendment to the
Official Zoning Atlas
Project Description The petitioner, Jamie Difrancesco is re-questing an Amendment to the Official
Zoning Atlas for a change in zoning
(Rezoning) from the RF (Religious Facil-
ities) Zoning District to the AG-2.5 (Agricultural - 2.5) Zoning District for a 6.65-acre property on the Southeast
corner of Okeechobee Road and Eleven
Mile Road, at 11275 Okeechobee Road.
Background On May 16, 2000, the St. Lucie County
Board of County Commissioners ap-
proved Resolution 00-024 granting a
change in zoning from the AG-2.5 (Agricultural - 2.5) to the RF (Religious
Facilities) Zoning District for the subject
property.
The purpose of the Agricultural – 2.5 is to provide and protect an environment suit-
able for productive commercial agricul-
ture, together with such other uses as
may be necessary to and compatible with productive agricultural surroundings.
The St. Lucie County Planning and Zon-ing Commission has the power to review and recommend to the St. Lucie County
Board of County Commissioners, for
approval or disapproval, any applica-
tions within their area of responsibility.
The Planning and Zoning Commission
strongly encourages your input and
comment at the public hearing. The pub-
lic will be able to physically attend this meeting, but seating in the Chambers will be regulated to comply with social
distancing protocols. Members of the
public who do not attend are encour-
aged to wear masks or similar devices, which cover the nose and mouth. You
may also mail or email written comments
regarding this proceeding in advance of
the public hearing for inclusion in the
official record.
Public comment for upcoming meetings
can be submitted several ways:
Email: Curryt@stlucieco.org; or Email: publiccomment@stlucieco.org
Anyone with a disability requiring ac-
commodations to attend this meeting
may contact the SLC Community Risk Manager at least 48 hours in advance at 772-462-1546 or TDD 772-462-1428.
Meeting Location: BOCC Chambers SLC Administration Annex,
2300 Virginia Avenue,
Fort Pierce, FL 34982
Meeting Time: 6:00 PM (or soon thereafter )
PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
This notice is provided because you are an owner of property within 500 feet of the proposed petition.
Page 55 of 107
Page 56 of 107
7/3/2020
Page 57 of 107
7/3/2020
Page 58 of 107
Page 59 of 107
From:jeannerbailey@aol.com
To:Tahir Curry
Subject:Public Hearing for Jamie DiFrancesco - Parcel ID# 2328-501-0001-000-8
Date:Tuesday, July 7, 2020 10:58:00 AM
SECURITY WARNING: This email originated from outside the County systems. Please show
caution when clicking links or opening attachments unless you recognize the sender and know
the content is safe. Questions, call Customer Service at 772-462-2146.
Hello,
I received your Public Hearing Notice regarding rezoning of this property back to AG-2.5. Iown property within 500 feet of the subject and I have no objection to rezoning back to AG-2.5 as it is consistent with the surrounding properties.
Thank you,Jeanne
Jeanne R. BaileySt.Cert.Resid.Appr. #RD604772.216.1235 ~ Mobile
Please Note: Florida has very broad public records laws. Most written communications to or from County officials regarding Countybusiness are public records available to the public and media upon request. It is the policy of St. Lucie County that all County recordsshall be open for personal inspection, examination and / or copying. Your e-mail communications will be subject to public disclosureunless an exemption applies to the communication. If you received this email in error, please notify the sender by reply e-mail and deleteall materials from all computers.
Page 60 of 107
9.B.
2020-50014
PUBLIC HEARING -PUBLIC
HEARINGS
AGENDA REQUEST DATE: 8/20/2020
*ACTION ITEM -
AMENDMENT
TO:Board of County Commissioners
PRESENTED BY:Katherine Barbieri, Assistant County Attorney III
SUBMITTED BY:County Attorney
SUBJECT:Backyard Chickens Ordinance
BACKGROUND:
Section 7.10.03 Animals in Residential Districts, St. Lucie County Land Development Code states:
"A. Except as provided in this section, no animals shall be kept in any residential district except those animals
generally recognized as household pets, such as dogs, cats, caged birds, etc. In any residential district, no more
than a total of five (5) dogs and/or cats four (4) months or older shall be allowed for each dwelling unit. For
the purposes of this section, "residential districts" shall not include the following: AG-1; AG-2.5; AG-5; AR-1
with agricultural classification pursuant to Section 193.461, Florida Statutes; or PUD where livestock is
permitted.
B. In the AR-1 district, animals other than household domestic pets may be kept provided they are not housed
within one hundred (100) feet of any property line.
C. In the RE-1 and RE-2 districts, horses may be kept provided that:
1. The property is at least two (2) acres;
2. No more than two (2) horses are kept;
3. The horses are for the private and personal use of the resident and his/her family; and,
4. The horses are to be stabled at least one hundred fifty (150) feet from any residence under separate
ownership and three hundred (300) feet from the edge of the right-of-way of any street."
Chickens are not generally recognized as household pets. Property owners having chickens has been a
Page 61 of 107
disputed issue in St. Lucie County for many years. On January 7, 2015 the St Lucie County Code Enforcement
Board ("SLC CEB") found a property owner in violation of Section 7.10.03 St. Lucie County Land Development
Code for housing animals other than household domestic pets less than one hundred (100) feet from the
property line on the property. The testimony was that the animals (chickens) were the property owner's
children's show chickens. The SLC CEB found there was a violation. The property owners were passionate
about their children's show chickens, retained an attorney and filed an appeal. The Circuit Court Appellate
Division affirmed the decision of the SLC CEB.
Residents have approached Code staff about having the ability to have backyard chickens. There is a trend in
society to incorporate fresher products into diets; a lifestyle which can be supported by allowing residents to
keep and raise chickens on their single-family residential properties for the purpose of producing eggs for
personal consumption. The St. Lucie County Land Development Code currently permits livestock and poultry
only in agricultural zoning districts. Many communities around the Country have been exploring how to
compatibly integrate backyard chickens into urban and suburban residential settings.
The topic of backyard chickens was presented to the Board in an informal meeting on November 14, 2017.
There were concerns expressed by the Board but the general discussion was to move forward with an
ordinance to allow backyard chickens. Prior to moving forward with the public hearing process, staff received
more feedback from the Board. The following concerns were expressed:
1. Coop standards / need setbacks from neighboring properties
2. Exclude the River Park Subdivision / Overlay District
3. Chicken Waste - nitrogen impacts to Indian River Lagoon
4. Odors
5. Noise - prohibit roosters
6. Rodents / storage of feed / no plastic containers
7. Disposal of deceased chickens
8. Diseases - Veterinary Care - Consult with Dr. Adams, a local farm animal/equine/livestock vet)
9. Permit requirement - do not require
Staff researched the concerns as noted above and provided the following information at the February 11,
2020 Board Informal meeting to address the concern:
1. Coop standards / need setbacks from neighboring properties - propose standards that coops are only
allowed in backyards with a minimum 10 foot side and rear yard setback and 25 foot setback from any
residential structure on an adjoining lot. There will be additional coop standards to regulate the height, size
and location from any street; and screening with a 6 foot high fence or wall along property lines.
2. Exclude River Park Subdivision/Overlay District - propose exclusion of the subdivision from the backyard
chicken ordinance. The exclusion can easily be supported due to an overlay zone in the community that
encourages redevelopment along a major roadway that serves as an entrance to the City of Port St. Lucie.
Also, chickens are not allowed in the City, and the adoption of a chicken ordinance could create problems
across jurisdictional lines.
3. Chicken Waste/ Nitrogen Impacts to the IR Lagoon - It is a known fact that chicken manure contains higher
Page 62 of 107
levels of nitrogen than cattle, sheep, and horse manure, and excess nitrogen can harm water bodies.
The ordinance can require coops be sanitary and removal of manure several times a week. Manure can be
disposed of in garbage bags or used as compost. Storage of manure must be kept in airtight containers.
4. Odors - chicken coops must be maintained in a sanitary manner to include clean water and feeding troughs,
removal of wet litter daily, and removal of manure and old feed several times a week.
5. Noise - Propose to prohibit roosters. Hens are not very loud and will cackle when laying eggs.
6. Rodents/Storage of Feed - Plastic containers shall be prohibited since rats eat plastic. The ordinance
requires that chicken feed be stored in metal containers.
7. Disposal of Deceased Chickens - The ordinance requires that owners will have the option to dispose of
deceased chickens into a garbage can or take to a veterinarian for disposal. The slaughtering of chickens is
prohibited.
8. Diseases / Veterinarian Care - the staff was directed to consult with a local veterinarian. Dr. Brett Adams
agreed to discuss and he provided insight into chicken diseases. Chicken diseases are zoonotic, meaning the
virus or bacteria can be transmitted to humans. The most common diseases are E.coli and salmonella. Since
small flocks of backyard chickens may carry such diseases, owners must use personal hygiene including
clothing and shoes after handling chickens and their eggs.
9. Permit to have backyard chickens - the Ordinance would require a one time registration for those that
desire to have chickens. The cost of the registration would be $ 25.00 and it would provide the county with
the location of the chickens and ensure the chicken owner is compliant with the regulations.
The ordinance would allow up to five (5) chickens on an occupied single-family property.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
On November 14, 2017 and February 11, 2020, the ordinance went before the Board of County
Commissioners at monthly informal meetings. On March 17, 2020, the Board of County Commissioners
authorized Permission to Advertise for amending Chapter 7.10.03 Animal in Residential Areas for public
hearing before the Planning and Zoning Commission and two (2) public hearings before the Board of County
Commissioners.
FINANCIAL IMPACT:
The cost to have Code Enforcement perform an annual inspection is $109.00. The proposed registration fee is
$ 25.00. The registration will provide a service to our citizens who participate in the backyard chicken
program. It will ensure compliance with the regulations, education, and penalties for violating the ordinance.
The cost of the work involved to process registration is higher than the proposed $25.00 fee. Staff feels most
citizens would not pay a fee higher than $25.00. Our research shows this fee is at the upper end for most
municipalities who have for backyard chickens regulations/programs. It may be more advantageous to have a
lower fee that more people would pay and be compliant with the rules than a higher fee and non-compliant
with the ordinance.
Page 63 of 107
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Planning and Zoning Commission forward the draft ordinance to the Board of County
Commissioners with a recommendation of approval.
COMMISSION ACTION:
RESULT:
MOVER:None
SECONDER:None
AYES:None
NAYS:None
EXCUSED:None
Coordination/Signatures
Date: August 17, 2020
Katherine Barbieri, Assistant County Attorney III
Date: August 17, 2020
Monica Graziani, Building & Code Regulation Manager
Date: August 17, 2020
Linda Pendarvis, Planning Manager
Date: August 17, 2020
Benjamin Balcer, Planning & Development Services Assistant
Director
Date: August 17, 2020
Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney
Date: August 18, 2020
Mark Satterlee, Deputy County Administrator
Page 64 of 107
ITEM 9.A. SUGGESTED MOTIONS:
MOTION TO APPROVE
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING,
INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS APPROVE THE PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
TEXT AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 7.10.03 ANIMALS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS TO
ESTABLISH A ONE-TIME REGISTRATION HOLDER PROGRAM FOR BACKYARD
CHICKEN-KEEPING AND CHICKEN COOPS ON AN OCCUPIED SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT PROPERTY IN RS-2, RS-3, RS-4 ZONING DISTRICTS
PROVIDING FOR EXCLUSION OF THE RIVER PARK SUBDIVISION BECAUSE….
[CITE REASON(S) WHY – PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]
MOTION TO DENY
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING,
INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING
COMMISSION OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD
OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE PROPOSED LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TEXT
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 7.10.03 ANIMALS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS TO ESTABLISH A
ONE-TIME REGISTRATION HOLDER PROGRAM FOR BACKYARD CHICKEN-KEEPING
AND CHICKEN COOPS ON AN OCCUPIED SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING
DISTRICT PROPERTY IN RS-2, RS-3, RS-4 ZONING DISTRICTS PROVIDING FOR
EXCLUSION OF THE RIVER PARK SUBDIVISION BECAUSE….
[CITE REASON(S) WHY – PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]
Page 65 of 107
TR-GCI0456746-01
ST.LUCIE COUNTY PLANNING
AND ZONING COMMISSION
ACTING AS THE LOCAL
PLANNING AGENCY
PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA
Thursday,August 20,2020
NOTICE OFAPROPOSEDTEXT AMENDMENTTO THELAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
TheSt.LucieCountyPlanning and Zoning Commissionis scheduled to reviewandmakea
recommendationregarding the followingCountyinitiatedproposalforadoption by the Board
ofCountyCommissioners of St.LucieCounty,Florida,by Ordinance:
ORDINANCE NO.20-XXX
FILE NO:XXXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST.LUCIE COUNTY,FLORIDA,
RELATING TO BACKYARD CHICKENS;AMENDING THE ST.LUCIE COUNTY CODE TO AMEND
CHAPTER 7.10.03 ANIMALS INRESIDENTIALAREAS TO ESTABLISHAONE-TIME REGISTRATION
HOLDER PROGRAM FORBACKYARD CHICKEN-KEEPING AND CHICKEN COOPSON ANOCCUPIED
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT PROPERTY IN RS-2,RS-3,RS-4 ZONING
DISTRICTS;PROVIDING FOR EXCLUSION OF THE RIVER PARK SUBDIVISION;ENUMERATING THE
TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONCERNINGTHEKEEPINGOF BACKYARD CHICKENS;ESTABLISHING
A ONE-TIME REGISTRATION HOLDER PROCESS;PROVIDING PENALTIES;PROVIDING FOR
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS;PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY;
PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE;PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND
CODIFICATION;ANDPROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVEDATE.
PURPOSE:A CountyinitiatedText Amendment tothe LandDevelopment Codeamending Chapter
7.10.03AnimalsinResidentialAreasto establish a one-timeregistrationholderprogramfor
backyardchicken-keeping andchicken coopsonanoccupied single-family residentialzoningdistrict
propertyin Rs-2,Rs-3,Rs-4Zoning Districts.
ThePlanning andZoning CommissionPUBLICHEARING on thisitemwillbeheldinthe Commission
Chambers,RogerPoitrasAnnex,3rd Floor,St.LucieCountyon Thursday,August 20,2020
beginningat 6:00pmoras soon thereafter aspossible.
Allinterested persons will be givenan opportunitytobe heard.The publicwillbeableto physically
attend thismeeting,but seatingin theChamberswillbe regulatedto complywithsocialdistancing
protocols.Members ofthe public whodoattend arerequiredto wearmasksorsimilardevices,
whichcover thenoseand mouthpursuantto Emergency Order 20-044.
Written commentsreceived inadvanceof thepublichearingwillalsobeconsidered.If residentsare
concernedabout COVID-19or have healthconcerns,please refrain fromcomingto public meetings
in person.You canlivestream themeeting andcontactthe commissioners viaphoneoremail asan
alternativeto making publiccommentsin person.
Publiccomment forupcomingmeetingscan be submittedseveralways:
•Emailatpubliccomment@stlucieco.org.
•Residents without Internetaccesscancomment byphone at772-462-1499 andTDD
(telecommunicationsdevice forthe deaf)number at772-462-1428.
Comments mustbesubmitted bynoon thedaypriorto themeeting.Commentswillbedistributed
totheCommissionin advance ofthe meetingand included inthe recordprovided thecomments
comply with theCounty’s rules.Comments received byphone will beeither played atthe meetingor
transcribed inwrittenform providedthatthe comments complywiththeCounty’srules.
General public comment islimitedtothreeminutesorroughly390words;while commentsfor public
hearingitemsare limitedto fiveminutesorroughly750words.
Thepetition fileisavailablefor review atthe PlanningandDevelopment Services Departmentoffices
locatedat 2300VirginiaAvenue,2ndFloor,FortPierce,Florida,during regular business hours.
Pleasecall(772)462-2822orTDD (772)462-1428if you haveanyquestionsorrequireadditional
information.
TheSt.Lucie CountyPlanning and ZoningCommission hasthepower toreviewandrecommendto
the St.LucieCountyBoard ofCountyCommissioners,forapproval or disapproval,anyapplications
withintheir area of responsibility.
Theproceedings ofthe Planningand ZoningCommissionare electronicallyrecorded.PURSUANT
TOSection286.0105,FloridaStatutes,ifaperson decidestoappealany decisionmadebythe
Planning and ZoningCommission with respecttoanymatter consideredatameeting orhearing,he
orshe will need arecord ofthe proceedings.Forsuch purpose,heorshe mayneed toensurethat
averbatimrecordof theproceedings is made,which recordincludesthetestimony andevidence
upon whichthe appealistobe based.Upon therequestof anyparty tothe proceeding,individuals
testifyingduring a hearing will be sworn in.Any party tothe proceeding will be grantedan
opportunity tocross-examine anyindividual testifyingduring a hearinguponrequest.Ifitbecomes
necessary,a publichearing maybecontinued toadate-certain.
Anyonewithadisabilityrequiring accommodation toattend thismeeting should contactthe St.
Lucie CountyCommunityRiskMangeratleastforty-eight (48)hours priorto themeeting at(772)
462-1546orT.D.D.(772)462-1428.Any questionsaboutthis agendamaybereferredtoSt.Lucie
CountyPlanning Divisionat(772)462-2822.
PLANNING AND ZONINGCOMMISSION/
LOCAL PLANNINGAGENCY
ST.LUCIE COUNTY,FLORIDA
/S/WILLIAM O’DELL,CHAIRMAN
PUBLISHDATE:Friday,August 7,2020
Page 66 of 107
R
r r.
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSION OF LAW, AND ORDER
CASE NO. 79092
ERIC AND ELIZABETH MARTIN
THIS CAUSE came on for a Violation Hearing before the St. Lucie County
Code Enforcement Board ('Board") on the 7th day of January, 2015 after due
notice to the Violators, Eric and Elizabeth Martin, and the Board having heard
testimony under oath, received evidence, and heard argument of counsel,
thereupon issues its Findings of Fact, Conclusion of Law, and Order as follows:
A. FINDINGS OF FACT: There are animals other than household
domestic pets housed less than 100 feet from the property line on the property
located at 7900 Hoeff aer Ln., Ft. Pierce, FL on property described as: MODEL
LAND CO'S S/D 23 35 39 N 1/2 OF LOT 5 AND THAT PART OF N 1/2 OF
LOT 6 LYG W OF HOUSTON TEXAS GAS AND OIL CORP IN NE 1/4 -LESS
W 534.94 FT AND LESS N 30FT- (1.48 AC) (OR 2032-258) as recorded in the
Public Records of St. Lucie County.
B. CONCLUSION OF LAW: Section 7.10.03, Animals in Residential
Districts, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, provides that no
animals shall be kept in any residential district except those animals generally
recognized as household domestic pets, no more than a total of three (3) dogs
and/or cats four (4) months or older shall be allowed for each dwelling unit. In the
AR -1 district, animals other than household domestic pets may be kept provided
they are not housed within one hundred (100) feet of any property line. Since the
Violators have animals other than household domestic pets housed within one
1
EXH1BlT
Page 67 of 107
hundred (100) feet cf the property line, Section 7.10.03 of the St. Lucie County
Land Development Code has been violated.
C. ORDER: Based on the findings of fact and conclusion of law set out
above, this Board determines that the Violators must abate the violation by cease
housing animals other than household domestic pets within one hundred (100) feet
of the property line on the property described above by February 6, 2015
Unless the violation is properly abated by Feb , , 6, 2015 , this Board may
levy a fine not to exceed two hundred fifty and 00/100 ($250.00) dollars per day
for each day the violation continues.
D. A proseculaon cost of two hundred dollars and 00/100 ($200.00) is
hereby assessed.
Any Party requesting a rehearing or reconsideration of the Board's action
must file a written request setting forth the legal grounds therefore with the Code
Enforcement Board Secretary within thirty (30) days of the date of this order.
DONE AND ORDERED this 71 day of January 2015.
ATTEST:
i
SECRETARY
L
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
MOA0ii"st.....•
P4
Page 68 of 107
0
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
Z Ir;_
COME ENFRCEMENTBOARD
ATTORNEY
I BEREBY CERTIFY that a true and correct copy of the above and
foregoing Findings of Fact, Conclusions of Law, and Order has been furnished by
mail to:
Eric and Elizabeth Martin
7900 Hoeffner Ln.
Ft. Pierce, Fl. 34945
Blaxberg, Grayson & Kukoff, P.A.
Moises T. Grayson, Esq.
25 SE 2nd Ave., Suite 730
Miami, FL 33131
SECRETARY
i
Page 69 of 107
MANDATE
aPR 1iZoos
C®UNTYATTt`7RNEY
FROM: -Joseph:E: Smith; "Clerk -of the Circuit Court
IN THE;CIRCUIT/COUNTY.COURT OF.TIjBNINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT
IN AND FOR ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
APPELLATE DIVISION
This cause having been brought to this Court by Appeal, and after due
consideration the court having issued its Opinion,
YOU ARE HEREBY COMMANDED that such further proceedings be had in this
cause in accordance with the Opinion of the Court, and with the rules of procedure
and the laws of the State of Florida.
WITNESS the HONORABLE LAWRENCE M MIRMAN, Presiding Judge of the
Appellate Division of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, and the seal of this Court at
Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, on this 7TH day of April, 2016.
DATE: April 7, 2016
CIRCUIT APPEAL CASE NO: 2015AP000005
LOWER:TRIBUNAL;CASE"N0:;CODE ENFORCEMENT. BOARD:
STYLE OF CASE: ...ERIC MARTIN & ELIZABETH MARTIN'...,,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD
Original to: Court File
Copies to: All Attorneys & Parties on Record
ERIC MARTIN 25 SOUTHEAST 2ND AVENUE, SUITE 730, FL 33131
ST. LUCIE COUNTY CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE, FORT PIERCE, FL 34982
ATTY FOR APPELLANT: MOISES THOMAS GRAYSON 25 SE 2ND AVE STE 730, MIAMI, FL 331311696
Page 1
P
of 2 C
St. Lucie County, File Date: 04/07/2016 - 10:55 AM
Page 70 of 107
JOSEPH E. SMITH
CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Lower Court / Tribunal/State Agency Clerk
Address P.O. Box 700, Ft, Pierce, FL 34954
Telephone Number (772) 462-6940
Email Address: appeals@stlucieclerk.com
FallwijN71i
SUZANNE POTrINGER
DEPUTY CLERK
St. Lucie County, File Date: 04/07/2016 - 10:55 AM
Page 2 of 2
Page 71 of 107
If --
Filing # 39295830 E -Filed 03/22/2016 10:06:42 AM
IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR THE
NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND
FOR ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
APPELLATE DIVISION
Circuit Case No. 15 -AP -5
ERIC MARTIN AND
ELIZABETH MARTIN,
Appellants, Not final until time expires for filing motion
V. for rehearing, and iffiled, disposed of.
ST. LUCIE COUNTY CODE
ENFORCEMENT BOARD,
Appellee.
Decision filed March 22, 2016.
Appeal from the St. Lucie County Code Enforcement Board.
Moises Grayson, Blaxberg, Grayson & Kukoff, P.A., Miami, for appellant.
Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney, and Katherine Barbieri, Assistant County Attorney, Fort
Pierce, for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Armed.
SWEET, MCMANUS, JJ., and ROBERTS, Acting Circuit Judge, concur.
Copies of above decision
were furnished to the attorneys/parties
of record on the same date
the decision was filed.
1
Page 72 of 107
Page 73 of 107
Page 74 of 107
Page 75 of 107
OCT272017
COUNTYATTORNEY
Page 76 of 107
STCC
F
Pets
plilarity
nationwide
ieir
food
choic,,,
s
and
garden
Page 77 of 107
m=
Page 78 of 107
10
sITrAn*
M27MAk"
2010401OW
bens
can
lay
between
150
to
300
eggs
per
year
depending
on
age
and
breed (
most
productive
between
1
and
2
years
old)
Average
hen
lifespan
is
8
years,
although
can
live
up
to
15
or
even
20
yearsEggs
from
backyard
chickens
are
fresher
than
store
bought
Taste
better
More
nutritious (
commercial
hens
have
standardize
diet)
mens
less
stressed
in
natural
environment
in
small
flocks
4 --
6
hens
can
provide
enough
eggs
for
a
typical
household
Page 79 of 107
VolusiaMarianSarasotaManateeAlachua
Page 80 of 107
Location
Map
of
chicken,
goats,
donkeys,
and
cow
Violations
Total #
of'
Chicken
Code
Cases:
2015
to
present
mm,
37
cases
all
abated)
rvejri
Page 81 of 107
STCC
Page 82 of 107
nimals
means
small
un-
hooved
animals
including
chickens,
turkeys,
doves,
pigeons,
quail,
gam
Small
farm
animals
do
not
include
household
pets.
Allow
in
all
single-
family
residential
zones
Prohibit
roosters,
peacocks,
guinea
hens
and
others
that
produce
noise
creating
a
nuisance
Maximum
6
hens
Minimum
Coup
standards
to
include
an
exercise
yard
Setbacks
for
coups
from
adjacent
properties
NO
free
roaming
NO
slaughtering
NO
odors
NO
noises
other
than
usual
Must
have
provisions
for
storage
and
disposal
of
or
compost
waste
Feed
must
be
stored
in
rodent
free
containers
Dead
chickens
must
be
disposed
of
properly
For
the
personal,
noncommercial
use
of
the
occupants
only
NO
salesRecommend
class
or,
how
to
raise
chickens
through
U
of
F
Ag
Extension
or
4H.
Page 83 of 107
m
w.. ..
M
Page 84 of 107
Board of County Commissioners
Informal Meeting
February 11, 2020
Page 85 of 107
Issues:
•Coop Standards / need setbacks from neighboring properties
•Exclude River Park Subdivision / Overlay District
•Chicken Waste – nitrogen impacts to the IR Lagoon
•Odors
•Disposal of Deceased Chickens
•Noise – prohibit roosters
•Rodents / storage of feed / no plastic containers
•Diseases -Veterinary Care
•Permit Requirement – do not require a permit
Board Feedback on Proposed
Use of Backyard Chickens
Page 86 of 107
Response to Issues
1. Coop Standards / Setbacks from neighboring properties:
•10 foot side and rear yard setback
•25 feet from any residential structure on an adjoining lot
•Maximum size of coop 120 square feet (10 x 12)
•Maximum height of coup 6 feet
•Keep coop in backyard of the residence
•Coop must be screened from adjacent roadways or neighboring properties
with a six foot opaque fence, wall or hedge
Page 87 of 107
Typical Lot with
Chicken Coop in Rear Yard
Standards for RS-4
Min. lot size = 10,000 sf
Side setback 7.5 feet
Rear setback 15 feet
Coop Setbacks
Rear yard only
10 feet side yard
10 feet rear yard
25 feet from nearest adj. structure
Prohibited in front yard and side yards
Page 88 of 107
Response to Issues, continued
2. Prohibit Chickens in the River Park Subdivision
•River Park Subdivision is primarily zoned RS-4 and only a small portion of the
subdivision is within the River Park Community Overlay Zone.
•The subdivision can be excluded from the proposed ordinance since
the area is subject to an overlay district that encourages
redevelopment along a major roadway corridor that serves as the
entrance to the City of Port St. Lucie.
•The City prohibits chickens and this could become a problem
across jurisdictional lines.
Page 89 of 107
Map of River Park Subdivision
and
the River Park Community Overlay Zone
Page 90 of 107
Response to Issues, continued
3. Chicken Waste
Benefits: It is a source of nutrients that can be used for compost or directly used as fertilizer tilled into the soil.
Risks: Nitrogen Impacts and Runoff
* Excess nitrogen can harm water bodies; it can cause overstimulation of growth of aquatic plants and
algae.
* Large-scale chicken farms can pollute natural resources like rivers and bays.
Staff spoke to Dr. Adams and he advised that the limited number of chickens would not create a runoff
problem nor an impact to the lagoon.
* Disposal of Manure
There are several ways to dispose of coop litter and manure: Store in air tight containers. Dispose in a garbage bag
for roadside pickup or use as compost in the garden.
4. Odors
The best method to minimize coop odors is to keep the chicken coop (water and feed troughs) sanitary. Remove manure
and old feed several times a week. Remove wet litter daily, if not it will create odors and bacteria.
Page 91 of 107
5. Deceased Chickens
Slaughtering should be prohibited. Dispose of in garbage can or take chicken to
veterinarian office for disposal or to have euthanized.
6. Noise
Roosters should be prohibited. Chickens, hens, are not very loud
and only make noise when they lay eggs, they ‘cackle’; and, will cackle or
squawk if predators are in the vicinity. Hens sleep once it is dark.
7. Rodents and Storage of Feed
Plastic containers should be prohibited since rats can eat plastic. It is
recommended that metal containers be used to store chicken feed.
Responses to Issues, continued
Page 92 of 107
Response to Issues, continued
8. Diseases
Staff consulted with a local domestic animals, equine and farm animal veterinarian, Dr. Brett Adams, and he provided insight into the concerns noting not to be alarmed by backyard chickens.
Some diseases are ‘zoonotic’, meaning the virus or bacteria can be transmitted from animals to humans. Most common zoonotic diseases from chickens are E.coli and salmonella.
•Migratory bird population, crows, blackbirds, carry the same diseases, as well as, pet parrots, turtles, dogs, and lizards.
•Small flocks, such as backyard chickens, may carry E.coli and salmonella. To avoid illnesses, chickens owners must wash hands after handling chickens and their eggs.
Most chicken ordinances don’t include the welfare of the chicken. The Board may want to consider an annual check-up with a veterinarian just like cats and dogs. Although, it is not recommended that the chickens have vaccines. Vaccines are only given to chickens in 4-H programs, Future Farmers of America programs or ‘show’ chickens.
Page 93 of 107
Response to Issues, continued
9. Permit requirement. How to monitor who has chickens in the community?
Staff recommends a ‘registration’ program for all new chicken owners.
Registration to include a nominal fee of $ 25.00 and the following standards:
1. Coop standards with setback requirements
2. No roosters, no free roaming chickens
3. Maximum 5 chickens
4. Keep chickens healthy
5. Homeowner Association and or property owner, if tenant, approval required
6. Provide for an annual inspection for compliance
7. A violation may result in a revocation of the registration
8. Prohibit selling eggs, chickens and no slaughtering
9. Recommend class on how to care for chickens at local University of Florida IFAS Extension or 4-H Program
Page 94 of 107
Total # of Chicken
Code Cases:
2015 to present
= 55 cases (abated)
(excluding Animal Control)
Page 95 of 107
4 – H Program
St. Lucie County Extension Office
Farm Animal Program Participants – 394 children
Poultry Program – 42 children (at 4-H)
Non-Agriculture Zoning – 55 properties cited
(RS-2, RS-3, RS-4, RMH-5, RM-5, CG, IL)
Code Cases – 4 cases pending
Page 96 of 107
Staff Recommendation
Option 1:
•Continue to use Code Compliance to regulate.
Option 2:
•Direct staff to prepare an ordinance to allow chickens in the RS-
2, RS-3 and RS-4 residential zoning districts.
•The AG-1, AG-2.5, AG-5 and AR-1 would be exempt from a
proposed backyard chicken ordinance.
Page 97 of 107
ORDINANCE No. 2020-XX
FILE NO.: XXXX
AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST.
LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO BACKYARD CHICKENS;
AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY CODE TO AMEND CHAPTER 7.10.03
ANIMALS IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS TO ESTABLISH A ONE-TIME
REGISTRATION HOLDER PROGRAM FOR BACKYARD CHICKEN-KEEPING
AND CHICKEN COOPS ON AN OCCUPIED SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENTIAL
ZONING DISTRICT PROPERTY IN RS-2, RS-3, RS-4 ZONING DISTRICTS;
PROVIDING FOR EXCLUSION OF THE RIVER PARK SUBDIVISION;
ENUMERATING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS CONCERNING THE
KEEPING OF BACKYARD CHICKENS; ESTABLISHING A ONE-TIME
REGISTRATION HOLDER PROCESS; PROVIDING PENALTIES; PROVIDING
FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY;
PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE
DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND
CODIFICATION; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, (Board) recognizes
the trend in society to incorporate fresher products into diets; a lifestyle which can be supported
by allowing residents to keep and raise chickens on their single-family residential properties to
produce eggs for personal consumption; and
WHEREAS, the St. Lucie County Land Development Code currently permits livestock and poultry
only in agricultural zoning districts; and
WHEREAS, many communities around the country have been exploring how to integrate
backyard chickens into urban and suburban residential settings compatibly; and
WHEREAS, the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners recognizes the desire of all
residents to live in a clean and pleasant environment free of excessive odor, noise, vermin, and
disease; and
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners desires to implement a registration holder
program to permit the keeping of up to five (5) chickens on an occupied single-family residential
zoning district property within the RS-2, RS-3, RS-4 zoning districts, excluding the River Park
Subdivision that is partially subject to an overlay district that encourages redevelopment to
improve the area that suffers from deficiencies and has not developed as a result of changing
market conditions, subject to the terms and conditions of this Ordinance.
Page 98 of 107
Ordinance No. 2020-XX
Section 7.10.03 Animals in Residential Districts
Backyard Chicken-Keeping Registration Program
File No.: XXXXX
Page 2
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
County, Florida:
PART A:INCORPORATION OF RECITALS. The above recitals are incorporated herein by
reference and form an integral part of the Ordinance.
PART B. SHORT TITLE. This Ordinance shall be known and referred to as the Backyard
Chicken-Keeping Program Ordinance.
PART C.INTENT AND PURPOSE. The intent and purpose of this Ordinance is to create a
one-time registration holder program to permit the keeping of up to five (5) chickens on an
occupied single-family residential zoning district property within the RS-2, RS-3, RS-4 zoning
districts, excluding the River Park Subdivision that is subject to an overlay district that encourages
redevelopment to improve the area that suffers from deficiencies and has not developed as a
result of changing market conditions, to meet the needs of the average family’s egg consumption.
PART D.The specific amendment to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to read
as follows in strikethrough and underline format:
PART E.CHAPTER 7.10.03. – Animals in Residential Districts.
A.Exempt as provided in this section, no animals shall be kept in any residential district
except those animals generally recognized as household pets, such as dogs, cats, caged birds,
etc. In any residential district, no more than a total of five (5) dogs and/or cats four (4) months or
older shall be allowed in each dwelling unit. For the purpose of this section, ”residential districts”
shall not include the following: AG-1; AG 2.5; AG-6: AR-1 with agricultural classification pursuant
to Section 193.461, Florida Statutes; or PUD where livestock is permitted.
An exemption to this section is granted by Section 7.10.03.D. – Backyard chicken-keeping One-
Time Registration Holder Program. The holder of a valid backyard chicken-keeping registration
is allowed up to a maximum of five (5) chickens on an occupied single-family residential zoning
district property within the RS-2, RS-3, RS-4 zoning districts, excluding the River Park Subdivision
that is partially subject to an overlay district that encourages redevelopment to improve the area
that suffers from deficiencies and has not developed as a result of changing market conditions
B.In the AR-1 district, animals other than household domestic pets may be kept provided
they are not housed within one-hundred (100) feet of any property line.
C.In the RE-1 and RE-2 districts, horses may be kept provided that:
1.The property is at least (2) acres;
Page 99 of 107
Ordinance No. 2020-XX
Section 7.10.03 Animals in Residential Districts
Backyard Chicken-Keeping Registration Program
File No.: XXXXX
Page 3
2.No more than two (2) horses are kept;
3.The horses are for the private and personal use of the resident and his/her family;
and,
4.The horses are to be stabled at least one hundred fifty (150) feet from any
residence under separate ownership and three hundred (300) feet from the edge
of the right-of-way of any street.
D.Backyard Chicken-keeping One-time Registration Holder Program:
(a)Purpose. The purpose of this One-time Registration Holder Program is to establish
and implement a Backyard chicken-keeping program allowing residents to keep or
raise chickens on a developed and occupied detached single-family residential
properties subject to the terms and conditions of this program. For this section,
the term “chicken” refers to female chickens only (i.e.hens).
(b)One-time Registration and general conditions for backyard chicken-keeping in
certain residential zoning districts. Persons desiring to participate in the backyard
chicken-keeping program shall obtain a registration from the Planning and
Development Services Department before keeping chickens
(1)The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners now establishes a
one-time fee of twenty-five dollars ($ 25.00) to process new registrations
for residential backyard chicken-keeping.
(2)No more than one registration holder for backyard chicken keeping shall
be issued per developed and occupied single-family residential property.
(3)If a tenant or person applying for a one-time registration for backyard
chicken-keeping is not a fee simple owner of the subject property, the fee
simple owner must join in and consent to the registration.
(4)To obtain registration under this program, persons applying for a
registration for the keeping of chickens must show that they can meet the
requirements of this program by a sketch plan of the back yard, including
all required principal structures and approval from a Homeowners’
Association where applicable.
(5)A signed and notarized affidavit is required to be submitted with all
backyard chicken-keeping registration holders. The affidavit shall state that
the chicken coop and enclosure will be designed, constructed, and
Page 100 of 107
Ordinance No. 2020-XX
Section 7.10.03 Animals in Residential Districts
Backyard Chicken-Keeping Registration Program
File No.: XXXXX
Page 4
operated to the standards outlined in the St. Lucie County Land
Development Codes. The affidavit shall also state that the drawings
submitted as part of the registration are a reasonably accurate
representation of the subject site features and adjacent properties.
(6)The County may conduct on-site inspections of the subject property to
make compliance determinations under this program before and after the
filing of the registration. The County may provide forty-eight (48) hour
notice to registration holders before performing inspections.
(7)The County may deny a registration application if the person(s) applying
for the registration cannot meet the requirements of this program. The
issuance of a registration for the keeping of chickens is conditioned upon
and subject to the terms and conditions of this Ordinance.
(8)Upon approval of registration, the location will be subject to an annual
inspection to ensure that the area is being maintained in a manner that is
safe and sanitary for the animals. The location cannot create a nuisance
for the neighbors. The is no fee for the annual inspection.
(9)If this section is repealed, the County will mail notices to each active
registration holder advising that they will need to relocate their chickens,
providing them at least sixty (60) days’ notice from the adoption of any
ordinance repealing backyard chicken-keeping program.
(10)If a resident decides to discontinue backyard chicken-keeping, or if their
registration is revoked, per Subsection (e), or this section is repealed, the
resident is responsible for finding appropriate homes for the chickens within
thirty (30) days. Also, a final inspection shall be completed in thirty (30)
days to ensure that the chickens, coop, and enclosure have been removed
from the property.
(11)The date a registration application is approved for the keeping of chickens,
such registration does not expire unless the registration holder is found in
violation of the ordinance, and violations are not corrected. The registration
will then be revoked, and the resident is responsible for finding appropriate
homes for the chickens with thirty (30) days. Also, a final inspection shall
be completed in thirty (30) days to ensure that the chickens, coop, and
enclosure have been removed from the property.
Page 101 of 107
Ordinance No. 2020-XX
Section 7.10.03 Animals in Residential Districts
Backyard Chicken-Keeping Registration Program
File No.: XXXXX
Page 5
(12)Up to five (5) chickens may be kept on an occupied detached single-family
residential property upon receiving an approved-registration from the
Planning and Development Services Department. Regardless of the
underlying future land use designation, chickens shall not be kept on
properties developed with commercial uses, mobile homes/manufactured
home parks, duplexes, triplexes, townhomes, and apartments or other
multifamily properties.
(13)Existing developed and occupied detached single-family residence that
was lawfully approved to raise chickens before the adoption of this
ordinance, shall be grandfathered and allowed to continue the use without
requiring registration.
(14)Every person who owns, controls, keeps, maintains, or harbors chickens
must keep them confined on the premises at all times within a chicken coop
or chicken enclosure unless a person is supervising the chickens within the
confines of a fenced rear yard on the premises. After a person has
completed the personal interaction and supervision of chickens within the
confines of the fenced rear yard, the chickens shall be returned to the coop
or enclosure. Supervising shall mean that the person is outside in the
fenced rear yard and has the chickens within sight distance at all times. No
electronic monitoring is permitted.
(15) The keeping of ducks, geese, turkeys, guinea fowl, and pigeons or any
other poultry or fowl by a person with an enclosure is prohibited under this
program. This program does not prohibit the existence of these species in
the wild as free-range birds.
(16)Chickens shall be kept for personal use only. Selling chickens, eggs, or
chicken manure, or the breeding of chickens for commercial purposes is
prohibited.
(17)Chickens shall not be bred or slaughtered on-premises. Deceased
chickens shall be disposed of within 24 hours; or, if sick, may be taken to a
veterinarian office to be euthanized.
(c)Location and requirements for chicken coops and enclosures. Backyard chicken-
keeping shall be permitted as an accessory use within single-family residential
zoning districts, where the lot or parcel is developed and occupied by a single-
family detached residence. Chickens shall not be kept on residential property with
mobile home/manufactured home parks, duplexes, triplexes, townhomes, and
apartments or other multi-family properties.
Page 102 of 107
Ordinance No. 2020-XX
Section 7.10.03 Animals in Residential Districts
Backyard Chicken-Keeping Registration Program
File No.: XXXXX
Page 6
(a)Permission for backyard chicken-keeping shall be subject to the following
standards and conditions:
(1)The maximum size of the coop and enclosure area shall be one-hundred
and twenty-five (125) square feet.
(2)The space per bird in the coop shall be not less than four (4) square feet.
(3)The coop and enclosure shall be set back a minimum of ten (10) feet from
the side and rear lot lines and a minimum of twenty (20) feet from any side
street, so long as the coop and enclosure area shall be at least twenty-five
(25) feet, from any residential structure on an adjoining lot. The coop and
enclosure must be kept in the rear backyard of the residence.
(4)A building permit from the building department shall not be required for the
coop. The registration for keeping backyard chickens shall list the
construction material methods as well as anchoring methods, such as tie-
downs. Prefabricated mobile coops may be exempt from the requirement
to obtain a building permit.
(5)The coop and enclosure area shall be located in the rear yard of the
developed and occupied single-family detached residential property.
(6)Nothing in this section shall prevent the construction of a coop and
enclosure from abutting the rear of an applicant’s house, so long as it
otherwise meets the requirements of this Code.
(7)The maximum height of a coop and the enclosure area fence around the
coop shall be six (6) feet, as measured from the existing grade to the
highest part of the coop or fence.
(8)Chicken coops and enclosures shall be completely screened from adjacent
roadways and neighboring parcels by a six-foot-tall opaque fence or wall
erected on the property line. A chain-link fence, chain-link fence with slats,
or similar fence shall not constitute an opaque wall or fence. A building
permit may be required to erect an enclosure area fence in according to
Section 8.00.04 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code
(9)Chicken coops shall be covered and ventilated, and a fenced enclosure/run
is required. The coop and enclosure must be constructed in a way that
Page 103 of 107
Ordinance No. 2020-XX
Section 7.10.03 Animals in Residential Districts
Backyard Chicken-Keeping Registration Program
File No.: XXXXX
Page 7
establishes a clean, safe, and pleasant environment free of odor, vermin,
noise, and disease.
(10)All enclosures for the keeping of chickens shall be so constructed and
maintained as to prevent rodents or other pests. Chicken coops must be
impermeable to rodents, wild birds, predators and weather, including all
openings, ventilation holes, doors, and gates. Enclosures shall be kept in
clean and neat conditions, including the provision of clean, dry bedding
materials and regular removal of waste materials, not to create an odor.
(11) All chicken feed shall be kept in a secured and covered metal container, or
otherwise protected to prevent rodents and other pests from gaining access
to it.
(d)Health, sanitation, and nuisance as applied to the keeping of chickens.
(1)Chickens shall be housed at all times within a covered coop or fenced
enclosure area, except that they may be removed from the coop or fenced
enclosure area by a resident or visitor of the home, provided the resident
keeps them under his or her continuous custody and control while they are
outside the coop or fenced enclosure area. No electronic monitoring is
permitted.
(2)Chickens must be secured within the chicken coop during non-daylight
hours.
(3)Chickens shall not be permitted to trespass on neighboring properties, run
at large, be released, or set free at any time.
(4)Chicken coops and runs shall be maintained in a clean and sanitary
condition at all times. Chickens shall not be permitted to create a nuisance
consisting of odor, noise or pests, or contribute to any other nuisance
condition.
(5)If a chicken is injured or bitten by a family dog or neighbor’s dog, said dog
shall not be classified as a dangerous dog according to Section 6-23 of the
St. Lucie County Land Development Code.
(6)All deceased chickens shall be properly disposed of off-site within 24 hours
of expiring.
Page 104 of 107
Ordinance No. 2020-XX
Section 7.10.03 Animals in Residential Districts
Backyard Chicken-Keeping Registration Program
File No.: XXXXX
Page 8
(7)In a public health emergency declared by the St. Lucie County Health
Department, including but not limited to an outbreak of Avian Flu or West
Nile virus, immediate corrective action shall be required, per applicable
public health regulations and procedures and Animal Service.
(e)Revocation and transfer of Registration
(1)Revocation. The registration that granted the authority to have backyard
chickens may be revoked by the County for the following reasons:
a.If a registration holder fails to obtain chickens within six (6) months
of obtaining the registration.
b.If any condition of the chicken-keeping ordinance has been violated,
the County may revoke the registration immediately if the violation
has not been remedied within seven (7) days after written notice of
the violation.
c.Without allowing the registration holder to remedy a violation as set
forth above, the revocation shall occur if more than three separate
violations occur in 90 days arising from the backyard chickens.
d.If revoked, neither the resident nor anyone else on the same
premises may reapply for a period for twelve (12) months from the
date of revocation. All chickens must be removed from the property
any time a registration is revoked.
e.A person aggrieved by a decision to deny or revoke a chicken-
keeping registration may appeal according to Section 11.11.00 of
the St. Lucie County Land Development Code.
(2)Transfer. A registration issued according to this section, shall not be
transferred to a subsequent property owner. Any subsequent property
owner will be required to apply for registration according to this section if
the subsequent property owner wants to keep chickens.
(3)Relocation. Any active registration holder who relocated to a new location
shall apply for a chicken-keeping registration for the new location.
(4)Cancellation. If a participant chooses to discontinue backyard chicken-
keeping, they must provide notice to the County and remove the chickens,
coop, and enclosure within thirty (30) days of the notice being given.
Page 105 of 107
Ordinance No. 2020-XX
Section 7.10.03 Animals in Residential Districts
Backyard Chicken-Keeping Registration Program
File No.: XXXXX
Page 9
(f)Violations. If a violation of this program occurs, the County shall have the right to
one or more of the following remedies or actions:
(1)Institute code enforcement proceedings and prosecute code violations
against the violator and the property owner of the real property where the
violation occurs according to Section 11.13.00 of the St. Lucie County Land
Development Code;
(2)Take any other action or remedy authorized by law or in equity, including
but not limited to, instituting an action in court to enjoin violating actions, in
which case the violating person shall be liable to the County for
reimbursement of the County’s attorney’s fees and costs concerning such
action;
(3)Revoke the registration for the keeping of chickens within ten (10) days.
PART F.CONFLICTING PROVISIONS.
Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie
County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this
ordinance, are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict.
PART G. SEVERABILITY.
If any portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional,
inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this
ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or
circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or
circumstance.
PART H. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE.
This ordinance shall be applicable in the unincorporated area of St. Lucie County.
PART I.FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE.
The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau
of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida
32304.
PART J. EFFECTIVE DATE.
Page 106 of 107
Ordinance No. 2020-XX
Section 7.10.03 Animals in Residential Districts
Backyard Chicken-Keeping Registration Program
File No.: XXXXX
Page 10
This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State.
PART K.ADOPTION.
After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows:
Cathy Townsend, Chair ______
Chris Dzadovsky, Vice Chair ______
Sean Mitchell, Commissioner ______
Linda Bartz, Commissioner ______
Frannie Mitchell, Commissioner ______
PART L.CODIFICATION.
Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Lucie County Code and Compiled
Laws, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section," "article," or another appropriate
word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or re-lettered to accomplish such
intention; provided, however, that Section 4 through 13 shall not be codified.
PASSED AND DULY ENACTED
Attest: Board of County Commissioners
St. Lucie County, Florida
By:
Deputy Clerk Chair
Approved As To Form and
Correctness:
By:
County Attorney
Page 107 of 107