HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 02-17-04
'7
,
~
'-'
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
./'
6A
2/17/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X],.,.
Quasi-JD [ X]"",
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
BACKGROUND:
Consider Draft Resolution 03-241 approving the re uest of Reitano Enterpri s, Inc. for a
change in zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning distric to the CG
(Commercial General) zoning district for property located on the east side 0 Koblegard
Road, approximately 330 feet north of the intersection of Indrio Road and Koblegard
Road to March 18, 2004. (File No.: CU-03-043).
At the December 2, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners continued the petition of
Reitano Enterprises, Inc. to rezone a 2.15-acre tract of land located on the east side of
Koblegard Road, approximately 330 feet north of the intersection of Indrio Road and
Koblegard Road, from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning district to the CG
(Commercial, General) zoning district until February 17, 2004. The reason for the
continuance was to include the parcel of land into the North County Charrette and
determine whether or not the proposed use is consistent with the outcome of the final
charrette plan.
SUBJ ECT:
The North County Charrette has been scheduled for the week of February 7 through the
13th, which will conclude with a public presentation of the outcome of the charrette input
on February 13, 2004. After this additional meetings will be held for the acceptance and
adoption of the final charrette master plan, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Land
Development Code amendments that may result from the charrette outcome.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
Based upon the charrette hot concluding until February 13', 2004 staff recommends that
the applicant's petition be continued for a minimum of 30 days, March 16, 2004.
N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
r
At the December 2, 2003 public hearing, the Board of County Commissioners
continued the public hearing on this matter until February 17, 2004.
At the November 20, 2003 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission, by
a vote of 8-0, with one member absent (Mr. Trias), recommended approval of the
applicant's request for a change in zoning.
Staff recommends continuing the public hearing on Draft Resolution 03-241, for 30
days (March 18, 2004) to allow for the drafting of the North County Charrette report.
Approved 5-0
CURRENCE:
COMMISSION ACTION:
~ APPROVED
c=J OTHER
D DENIED
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Coordination! Signatures
County Attoroey
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
:~
Mgt. & Budget:
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works:
Other:
Jþ.1{) / ~'
f (
Yn'.\\
.,
\r
....,
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
6/3
2/17/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
To:
Submitted By:
~
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
Presented By
V'J\ ù rz:~
evelopment Dir ctor
,..--,L---
(/"
/
SUBJECT:
Consider Draft Resolution 04-009 approving the request of Palms &
Tropical Trees Depot, Inc. for a change in zoning from he AG-1
(Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning district to the IL (Industrial Light) zoning
district for property located on the west side of Kings Highway,
approximately 2,500 feet south of Angle Road, directly south of the
existing Kraft Garden Nursery. (File No.: RZ-03-044).
BACKGROUND:
Attached is a copy of the petition of Palms & Tropical Trees Depot, Inc.,
for a change in zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning
district to the IL (Industrial Light) zoning district, for a 20.41-acre tract of
land located on the west side of Kings Highway, approximately 2,500 feet
south of Angle Road, directly south of the existing Kraft Garden Nursery.
The applicant has indicated that the purpose of this change in zoning is
to allow for the construction of an industrial park.
The permitted uses in the IL (Industrial light) zoning district are not
expected to negatively impact the existing uses in the surrounding area or
place additional demands on public services in the area.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
At the January 15, 2004 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning
Commission, by a vote of 7-1, with one member absent (Mr. Akins),
recommended approval of the applicant's request for a change in
zoning.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-009.
r
Approved 5-0
D glas M. Anderson
ounty Administrator
COMMISSION ACTION: RRENCE:
~ APPROVED D DENIED
c=J OTHER
Coordination! Signatures
County Attorney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
í,ft
Mgt. & Budget:
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works: /\,h't' I ~,
Other: ' I (m
\ Y\t,J;.,
v
..
'-'
-...I
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
....-
be.-
2/17/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Cómmissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
Consider Draft Resolution 04-012 approving the request of Carlos unoz Quintana,
for a Major Adjustment to an existing Minor Site Plan and Condition I Use Permit to
allow the construction of a 9,040 square foot second story addition to the PSL
Moving & Storage Depot mini-warehouse and self-storage facility (File No.:
SPMN-03-008 and CUMJ-03-003) '.
BACKGROUND:
On March 7, 2000, this Board, via Resolution 00-007, granted Minor Site Plan ___
approval and Conditional Use Permit approval for the PSL Moving & Storage
Depot. The developers are now applying for a Major Adjustment to the existing Site
Plan and Conditional Use Permit to allow the addition of a 9,040 square foot second
story: The developer is proposing to utilize the additional 9,040 square feet for mini-
warehousing and storage use.
The proposed second story addition at the PSL Moving & Storage Depot facility
has been determined not to have an undue or adverse effect upon nearby properties.
The subject property is surrounded by commercial uses to the north, south and east
and residential uses to the west. The proposed project is consistent with the existing
commercial development patterns along South US Highway One.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-012.
r
CURRENCE:
,.. ~\1
COMMISSION ACTION:
OCJ APPROVED
t=J OTHER
D DENIED
Approved 5-0
-
ouglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Coordination! Signatures
County Attorney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
,t~'
Mgt. & Budget:
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works: ~.,
Engineering: ¡/r~'? I
Other: ' ¡
,
. ¡~,~,~)
",i
'-'
'-wi
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
..-
-6b
Feb. 17,2004
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Cómmissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
Consider Draft Resolution 04-006 granting approval to th petition of Reserve Ho es Ltd., for
a Change in Zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 dulacre) Zoning ¡strict to the
PUD (Planned Unit Development) Zoning District and Final Planned Unit evelopment
approval for the project known as Parcel 21 @ The Reserve (Brlarcliff) a 33-lot single-
family residential subdivision. (File No.: RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016)
BACKGROUND:
Reserve Homes, Ltd., has submitted a Final Planned Unit development site plan for Parcel 21
@ the Reserve (a!kIa Briarcliff). The overall Master Plan for the Reserve identified Parcel 21
as a 10.232-acre tract of land that was originally to include 35 residential units, with a net site
density of 3.42 du/acre. Reserve Homes, Ltd is now proposing to complete the development
of this parcel as a 33-lot single-family unit residential development.
Parcel 21 @ the Reserve, is part of the ReseNe, a Development of Regional Impact (DRI).
The ReseNe DRI is approved for a total of 4,100 dwelling units; four golf courses; 1,600,000
square feet of industrial development; 290,000 square feet of commercial development;
100,000 square feet of office space and 250 hotel/motel rooms. As of this date, approximately
1,124 dwelling units have been permitted for construction, and another 609 units have
received site plan approval but have not yet been built.
The proposed subdivision and Final Development Plan is consistent with the approved DRI,
existing and proposed land uses in the area, and with the previously approved Preliminary
Development Plan for the area known as PUD II @ the Reserve.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
r
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-006 approving the petitioner's request for
final Plan Unit Development for a 33-lot single-family residential subdivision to be known as
Parcel 21 @ the Reserve (Briarcliff), subject to the limiting conditions contained therein.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approved 5-0
RRENCE:
COMMISSION ACTION:
[K] APPROVED
c=J OTHER
D DENIED
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Coordinationl Signatures
County Attorney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
ct--
1..-.1<
Mgt. & Budget:
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works:
Other:
. i-iW~¡
\r
....¡
Agenda Request
Item Number: s· t.
MeetinQ Date: Feb, 17,2004
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Có~missioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
Consider Draft Resolution 04-013, approving the request of Robert Stieg e, Centerline
Homes, for a change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential Single-family - 2 du/acre)
zoning district to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) zoning district and Preliminary and
Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval for an 84-unit townhouse project to be
known as Shadow Oaks @ 1O-Mile Creek, for property located at the southwest corner
of South 25th Street and Ten Mile Creek. (File No.: RZ-03-031, PUD-03-020)
BACKGROUND:
Robert Stiegele, Centerline Homes, the developer of Shadow Oaks @ 10-Mile Creek is
requesting a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-family - 2 dulacre)
zoning district to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) Zoning District and Preliminary
and Final PUD approval for the construction of an 84-unit townhouse project on a
42.07-acre parcel of land to be known as Shadow Oaks @ Ten Mile Creek.
On December 2, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners granted a shoreline
variance to allow construction of the onsite roadways within 100 feet of the 300-foot
shoreline setback zone, the construction of units 31-38 and 43-47 within 30 feet of the
existing wetland and construction of two stormwater ponds within 50 feet of the
shoreline.
The proposed Preliminary and Final Development Plan is consistent with the existing and
proposed land uses and development patterns in the area.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
At the January 15, 2004 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission
forwarded the petition with a recommendation of approval by a vote of 7-1, with one
member absent (Mr. Akins).
r
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-013 approving the petitioners
request for change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-family - 2 du/acre)
zoning district to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) zoning district and Preliminary
and Final PUD approval for an 84-unit townhouse project to be known as Shadow
Oaks @ 10-Mlle Creek, subject to the limiting conditions contained therein.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approved 5-0
CURRENCE:
COMMISSION ACTION:
I :*, I APPROVED D DENIED
c.=J OTHER
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Coordinationl Signatures
County Atto~ney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
~/
Y
Mgt. & Budget:
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works:
Other:
\.t
-...I
Agenda Request
Item Number
Date:
5-f"
02117/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Public Works
Presented By
~
Environmental Resources Ma er
Consider Draft Resolution 04-015 granting a Variance from Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a)(2)
of the St Lucie County Land Development Code - St Lucie River Shoreline Setbacks,
for property located at 6414 Riverland Drive.
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
Petition of Joseph and Laura Vardalis through agent Dennis Corrick, for a Variance from
Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a) of the St Lucie County Land Development Code - St Lucie
River Shoreline Setbacks, to allow for the continued use of a deck within 75 feet of the
Mean Higl'1 Water line of the St Lucie River. (File No.: BCC-04-001)
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-015.
r
~ COMMISSION ACTION:
APPROVED D DENIED
'='
I~J OTHER A d 5 0
~ pprove -
CURRENCE:
Coo"" Aft,,,., '~
Originating Dep!.: v+Mb
Finance: (
~oordinationl Signatures
Mg!. & Budget:
Other;
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Purchasing: ~ J
Other: ~ -
C~,lJeJ\
\...
To:
Submitted By:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
r
RECOMMENDATION:
COMMISSION ACTION:
[iJ APPROVED
c:J OTHER
County Attomey
Originating Dept.: -
Finance:
'wi
Agenda Request
Item Number
Date:
---
-66-
02/17/04
"
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
Consider the continuation of the applicati®--ß Glassman Holdings, LLC for a
Change to the Future Land Use Map of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive
Plan until March 16, 2004.
Glassman Holdings, LLC, proposes a change in Future Land Use classification
from RE (Residential Estate - 2 du/ac) to RU (Residential Urban - 5 du/ac) and
movement of the Urban Service Boundary Line approximately 1,050 feet to the
west to incorporate the parcel (File No: PA-03-002). The 47.96 acre site is
located northwest of the intersection of Indrio Road and Emerson Avenue in the
area currently under review as part of the North County Charrette.
. The amendment site's existing future land use designation allows for residential
uses at 2 dwelling units per acre or a total of 96 dwelling units. The proposed
change to RU would allow a maximum of 5 dwelling units per acre or 240 total
dwelling units. The applicant stated intent is to develop the property with 140
single-family homes, which would result in an overall density of almost 3
dwelling units per acre.
N/A
At the June 19, 2003, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County
Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 5 to 3, recommended denial of
the requested change in future land use classification from the RE
(Residential Estate) and RU (Residential Urban).
On September 2, 2003, the Commission tabled the consideration of the
transmittal of an amendment until February 17, 2004.
Continue the application of Glassman Holdings, LLC, for a change in Future
Land Use classification from RE (Residential, Estate) to RU (Residential,
Urban) until M~rch 16,2004.
D DENIED
Approved 5-0
__.Jrdinationl Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
'-'
To:
Submitted By:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
r
RECOMMENDATION:
COMMISSION ACTION:
[]lJ APPROVED
~ OTHER
Motion to object (Failed 3-2)
Comm. Bruhn - No
Comm. Hutchinson - No
'-'"
Agenda Request
Item Number
Date:
5-Þ{
02117/04
~>
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
Consider Draft Resolution 04-011 granting a Change in Zoning fro the RMH-5
(Residential, Mobile-Home - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning
District for property located at the northwest corner of the intersection of St. Lucie
Boulevard and Hammond Road.
The petitioner, John M. Dunn, has requested this change in zoning from the RMH-5
(Residential, Mobile-Home - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning
District on property located at 2835 Hammond Road, (the northwest corner of the
intersection of St. Lucie Boulevard and Hammond Road) in order to allow the property to
be utilized as a base of operations for his heavy equipment contract ring business. The
subject property is located to the wesVsouthwest of the St. Lucie County International
. Airport and north of property currently zoned and used for light industrial purposes.
N/A
At the January 15, 2004, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning
and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 2 (Mr. McCurdy and Mr. Lounds) with one
member (Mr. Akins) absent, recommended denial of the requested change in zoning to
the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District.
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-011.
U DENIED
Comm. Lewis - No
Staff recommendation Approved
5-0
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
- ,,~
_.--
Comm. Barnes - No
Comm. Coward - No
Coordination! Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
r-Y-1. COMMISSION ACTION: ,
~ APPROVED D DENIED
CJ OTHER
'-'
To:
Submitted By:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
r
RECOMMENDATION:
County Attorney"
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
....."
Agenda Request
Item Number
Date:
~. ::r
02117/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
Consider Draft Resolution 04-016 granting a ajor Adjustment to n Existing
Conditional Use Permit to allow for the expansion of an existing free-stan ing drinking
place and retail liquor (distilled and un-distilled) store in the CG (Commercial, General)
Zoning for the Lakewood Park Liquor Store on property located at 4902 North Kings
Highway (Indrio Crossing Shopping Center).
The petitioner, Ranjana Patel, operates the Lakewood Park Liquor & Pub in the Indrio
Crossings Shopping Center. On March 13, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners
granted approval, through Resolution 90-72, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a
package liquor store and lounge for the subject property located at 4902 North Kings
Highway. The purpose of the Major Adjustment is to allow for the expansion of the retail
sale of liquor (distilled and undistilled) for off-site consumption into additional square
footage at the shopping center..
The proposed Major Adjustment has been determined to meet the standards of review
as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and is
not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County
Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is not expected to
adversely impact the surrounding area or properties. The existing and proposed
location is within an existing shopping center, which is zoned for general commercial
uses. The proposed use is not expected to create significant demands on any of the
public facilities in this area.
N/A
On March 13, 1990, through Resolution 90-72, this Board granted a conditional use
permit to allow a package liquor store and lounge to be known as Lakewood Park
Liquor Store in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District.
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-016.
Approved 5-0
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
~-(/
Coordination! Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
\..
'wi
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
5- -1
Feb 17, 2004
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ x]
[
[ ]
[ x ]
Quasi-JD [
BACKGROUND:
Consider Draft Ordinance 04-003, amending the SI. Lucie County d Development Code y creating
section 3,01.03(EE) Cpub, Conservation - Public. Zoning District and by amending Section 7.04. 1, Table
7-10 to provide for minimum lot standards for this new zoning district
Draft Ordinance 04-003, proposes to Create new Zoning District to be known as Cpub (CONSERVATION-
PUBLIC). This Zoning District will correspond to the newly created Conservation Public, Future Land Use
Category, that was created as part of recent amendments to the County Comprehensive Plan, The uses
within this Zoning District are limited to parks and other related conservation! habitat protection uses. This
zoning designation will only be applied to properties that are in public ownership. Privately held property,
even if it is open to public use, would not be a candidate site for the application of this zoning district.
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County C9mmissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
On January 15, 2004, the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency for SI. Lucie County
held a public hearing on this matter. At the conclusion of that hearing, the Board voted 8-0 to recommend
that the County Commission approve Draft Ordinance 04-003. In forwarding this recommendation to the
Board, the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency for SI. Lucie County made the
following amendments to parts (2), (7) and (8) of this draft Ordnance.
2. Permitted Uses
a, Cl/llYral a¡¡tipities aRS¡ Ratl/Fe ext:lillitieRs. (999)
b. Public Conservation areas. includina hiking. canoeing. fishing. bird watching,
Dicnicking, nature exhibits and all existing uses that are not negativelv affecting the
Duroose of the Dublic Durchase., (999)
s, PI/Illig PaFks aRS¡ ReGrealieR Areas (999)
S¡, Pelise &. Fire PFsleelieR (9221,9224)
e. ResrealieRal Astivilies. ¡g99)
7. Conditional Uses
Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10,23 (999)
Helioort landin~akeoff Dads, (999)
Restaurants. _Including the sale of alcoholic beverages for on-Dremises
consumDtion onlv.) (999)
8, Accessory Uses
a,
b.
b,
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following:
r
::
Detached single-family dwelling unit or mobile home. for on-site security purposes.
(999)
~:~:~iRf::ee~ pa(¡ s. (999)
~__ t------I-. _1__luS¡IRg the sale ef alsehelis IIsperages fer eR preFRises
seRsl/FRptieR eRly.) (999)
a.
RECOMMENDATION:
No action is required from the County Commission at this time. This is the first of two required public
hearings on this matter. The second public hearing on this matter will be held on Tuesday, March 2. 2004,
at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible.
COMMISSION ACTION:
C:=J APPROVED
cx:J OTHER
D DENIED
No action required at
this time.
ouglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
County Attomey
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
~9y-
Coordination! Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
(agend772)
'-'
.....,
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
S:/<
Feb 17, 2004
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ x]
]
[ ]
[ x ]
Quasi-JD [
BACKGROUND:
Consider general amendments to the County's zoning maps consisten with recent
changes to the County Future Land Use Maps.
As part of the general amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan that were
reviewed and approved by this Board some time ago, the County made several changes
to the Future Land Use designations effecting a number of publicly owned parcels in the
community. As part of the process to bring the zoning designation of those parcels in
line with the land use designations applied to them, staff has prepared a series of
amendments to the county's zoning maps that address those land use changes.
nt Director
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
C
SUBJECT:
The attached map series indicates those areas of the community where these changes
will take place. In general, what we are seeking to do is apply the new Cpub zoning
designation to these areas of the community that have a Cpub (Conservation Public)
Future Land Use designation; apply a utility or industrial designation to those lands
around the airport that currently are zoned for residential use but that have been
acquired by the County for the purposes of airport development or noise abatement
(such as the Ridgehaven Subdivision area); and to apply a more appropriate zoning
designation to a number of existing schools, parks and other public facilities throughout
the County. Because of the areas involved with some of these properties, small-scale
maps are not possible to produce. I have attached several larger scale maps that I
believe adequately highlight the areas under amendment consideration, however if you
have about any of them please let me know.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
r
On January 15, 2004, the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency for
St. Lucie County held a public hearing to review these amendments; copies of the
minutes of that meeting are attached for your review. At the conclusion of that hearing,
the Board voted 8-0 to recommend that the County Commission approve the indicated
amendments to the County's zoning maps.
The Public Hearing set for February 17, 2004, was intended to be the first of two
scheduled public hearings on this matter. However, we have been advised that some
members of the community felt the published notice for these changes, while complaint
with the County's notification procedures, was not adequate or legible enough in its
published form for all interested persons to understand. Accordingly, at this time I would
request that the Board withhold any action on this matter and we will re-notice the
hearings on this topic with a more pronounced newspaper ad and if the Board feels it
appropriate, mailed notices to all property owners within or adjacent to the effected
areas.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
o APPROVED
Ci) OTHER
o DENIED
No action required at
this time.
COMMISSION ACTION:
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
Ltc
~I
Coordination! Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
(agend773)
~
...,
ITEM NO.6
DATE: February 17. 2004
AGENDA REQUEST
~'
REGULAR: (X)
PUBLIC HEARING: ( )
CONSENT: ( )
TO: BOARD dF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ADMINISTRATION
SUBJECT: Purchase of Harbor Branch Shrimp Property
BACKGROUND:
See áttached memorandum
FUNDS AVAILABLE: 001-9910-599100-800 General Contingency $10,400
Budget Amendment # 04-137 I CAP 04-082
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that we allocate $10,400 from Contingency to perform
appraisals and due diligence as the first step in acquiring this property. Staff is recommending that we
allocate an amount from Contingency not to exceed $10,400 to perform the appraisals and title work on this
property and approve BA #04-137 and CAP 04-082.
o APPROVED
¡OTHER:
r 0 DENIED
Re-agenda for 2/24/04 more
information requested.
COMMISSION ACTION:
Review and Approvals
o County Attorney:
o Management and Budget:
o Purchasing:
o Originating Dept:
o Other:
o Other:
o Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable:
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the Sf. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 772-462-1777
or TTD 772-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting.
H:\WIN\O WORDIAGENDAW\HBOIAGENDA.DOC
~
To:
Submitted By:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
r
COMMISSION ACTION:
[jJ APPROVED
c=J OTHER
County Attorney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
"'"
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
è,-2A
2/17/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[X]
[ ]
[ ]
Quasi-JD [
~
Board of County Gommissioners
Community Development
Request to approve Budget Amendment No. 04-134 for $5,000 and Equipment
Request No. EQ 04-238 for the purchase of traffic counters.
Each year the MPO division of the Community Development Department has
~ received approval from FDOT to purchase traffic counters with federal funds.
Previous years required an 18% local match from Road and Bridge.
The local match is no longer required. FDOT approved $10,000 in federal funds
for the purchase of traffic counters for this fiscal year, in compliance with the
UPWP plan for transportation planning. $5,000 is already in the approved MPO
bµdget. The additional $5,000 will be moved through the attached budget
amendment. _
The traffic counters will be housed at the Road and Bridge division of Public
. 12, Works and paid with 100% federal funding.
001149-1510-564000-100 - Capital Equipment MPO Grant $5,000
None.
Recommend approval of BA #04-134 and EQ #04-238 for traffic counters.
D DENIED
Approved 5-0
RRENCE:
ouglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Coordination! Signatures
,jY' Mgt. & Budget:- ~
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works:
Other:
. ----~---_.--...~-~-
'-'
Agenda Request
~-
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDA TIOW
r
COMMISSION ACTION:
.....,
Item NumberC" c;2 8
Date: February 17,2004
Consent
Regular
Public
Presentation
Leg. [ ]
[X ]
[ ]
[ ]
Quasi-JD [
Approval of the Commissioner's Award for Art For Nature Spring Plei . Air 2004
\
This yêars Art For Nature Spring Plein Air will be hosted by the Backus Gallery
with an opening reception and auction of paintings donated for the benefit of the
ESL program on March 19, 2004. Last year the Art For Nature Spring Plein Air
artists donated 31 paintings that raised $6,931 for the County's ESL fund. This
year we expect the event to be larger than last years with the potential to raise
greater fu~ds for the ~reservation of lands through our ESL program.
,bast year, the Commission approved a $100 award for the best painting of lands
purchased through the Environmentally Significant Lands (ESL) program. This
year we are requesting your approval to increase the Commissjoner's Award to
$250.00.
oaf-ISIS - 5tlsO"O-loO
N/A
Approve a $250 Commissioners Award for the Best ESL painting created
during the 2004 Art For Nature Spring Plein Air event. The award shall be
given to the artist whose painting best portrays one of the County's ESL sites.
00 APPROVED
c:J OTHER
CJ DENIED
- Approved 5-0
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
ENCE:
las M. Anderson
County Administrator
y
Coordination! Signatures
Mgt. & Budget: ~
Other: ~9
Purchasing:
Other:
_ _(insert file ref)
- ---.-..-.-------------...----
~
.~
Agenda Request
Item Number ¿.....c... .
February 17,
2004
Date:
~-
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[X ]
[ ]
[ ]
Quasi-JD [
BACKGROUND:
Board of County Commissioners Presented By
Community Develo~ment vv¡ .' ,
-:/ elopme t Di ector
Request approval of the Third Amendment to the Consultant Agreeme (It between
Janus Research Inc. and St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners.
The subject agreement provides for the attendance of the Consultant at an upcoming
public meeting regarding the proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance. The first public
meeting regarding the proposed ordinance was held on January 28, 2004 at the White
City Elementary School. An estimated 100 people attended the meeting and there was
a great deal of discussion on both sides of the issue. Given the high level of interest in
the ordinance, staff has scheduled a second public meeting on February 25, 2004, at
the St.. ,Lucie School House in St. Lucie Village. The third amendment will allow Ellen
Uguccioni, Historical Preservation Planner to attend that meeting. The amendment is
attached for your review.
To:
Submitted By:
SUBJECT:
r
r
RECOMMENDATION:
Funds are available in account number lð;?~/Slo.531000-100 (Professional
Services).
On May 7, 2002, the Commission approved staff recommendation to award· the
Historical Resources RFP to Janus Research Inc.
On December 17, 2002, the Commission approved the First Amendment to the
Consult Agreement to extended the expiration date and include a survey of historic
roadways.
On September 2, 2003, the Commission approved the Second Amendment included
the submission of FMSF forms and attendance at five meetings/hearings regarding
the ordinance.
Approve the Third Amendment to the Consultant Agreement between Janus
Research Inc. and St. Lucie County to include the Consultants attendance at an
additional public meeting regarding the Historical Preservation Ordinance.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
, COMMISSION ACTION:
~ APPROVED c=J DENIED
C:=I OTHER Approved 5-0
NCURRENCE:
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
:;y
Coordination!. ~!~na~;~
Mgt. & Budget: ~I
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
(AGEND595a)
-------..--------
t
'-'
"-"
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
t~ .,. 2D
2/17/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[XX]
[ ]
[ ]
Quasi-JD [
~'
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. 04-32 to accept FDOT federal funds approved 0 February
6, 2004 in the amount of $50,000. These funds will be used to pay 59% of
the North County Charrette Design Study, being held 217/04 through
2/13/04, by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council.
...
BACKGROUND:
,,,.
St. Lucie County MPO submitted an amendment for the FY '03/04 UPWP
for additional PL funds to the overall approved budget to include a subtask.
This subtask is a North County Charrette to be conducted by the Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) for St. Lucie County. The MPO
is allocated approximately 59% of the total $85,000 charrette cost as a
partner agency (passing funds through to the County as the prime agency).
The TCRPC will be paid with County funds initially with MPO funds
reimbursement in the amount of $50,000.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
Funds to be placed into: 001149-1510-531000-100 -- MPO Professional
Services.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
Board approved the agreement with TCRPC for Design Charrette and
Town Planning Services for North St. Lucie County per contract C04-01-
026, in January 27,2004.
RECOMMENDATION;..
Recommend approval of Resolution No. 04-32, for $50,000.
r
COMMISSION ACTION:
~\ APPROVED
c=J OTHER
D DENIED
Approved 5-0
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
County Attorney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
(JY
Coordination! Signatures
Mgt. & Budget: ~
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works:
Other:
c
'-'
'"
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. 3A
DATE: February 17, 2004
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
y~
CONSENT [x]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMmED BY(DEPT): County Attorney
Daniel S. McIntyre
County Attorney
SUBJECT:
Resolution 04-57 - Permanent Slope Easement
Lennard Road MSBU
Frank and Sandra Lagana
Parcel 23 - Tax I.D. #3414-501-0608-000/0
BACKGROUND:
A Contract for Sale and Purchase for right-of-way on Lennard Road was
approved by the Board on October 7, 2003. For the purpose of tying in and
harrnonizing the property with the roadway, a Permanent Slope Easement was
needed which Mr. and Mrs. Lagana have donated to the County.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION: On October 7. 2003 - the Board approved a Contract for Sale and Purchase
of right-of-way needed from Mr. and Mrs. Lagana for the Lennard Road MSBU
project.
June 6. 2000 - Initial Public Hearing held. Board of County Commissioners
approved the Lennard Road MSBU project to provide roadway, water and sewer
improvements and authorized staff to proceed with design and permitting.
November. 2001· - Second Public Hearing held. Adopted Preliminary
Assessrnent Roll. Approval to commence construction.
r
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute
Resolution No. 04-57 accepting the Permanent Slope Easement and instruct
staff to record Resolution No. 04-57 in the Public Records of St. Lucie
County, Florida.
[X APPROVED [ ) DENIED
[ ) OTHER: Approved 5-0
Do glas M. Anderson
County Administrator
COMMISSION ACTION:
[X] County Attorney:
:Jt
Review and Approvals
[x ,",Ii, w""'~ [x E"9;_;",,,-.1!lVf!
[ ] Road and Bridge: [ ] Community Dev:
.J...."" J..
[x ] Originating Dept: ,..
'--
"'"
'.
ITEM NO. 4b
DATE: February 17, 2004
AGENDA REQUEST
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING []
CONSENT [X]
TO:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY: ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION (4110)
. Scott Herring, P. E.
Road & Bridge Manager
SUBJECT:
Establishing Multi Way Stops on Easy Street and on Palm Drive in Indian River Estates.
. BACKGROUND:
At the December 2, 2003 County Commission Meeting, the Board directed staff to install multi way stops on
Bartow Street in Indian River Estates and to present a plan to the Indian River Estates Homeowners Association
on alternative placement of stop sign in Indian River Estates. Staff attended the meeting of the Indian River
Estates Homeowners Association on January 28, 2004 to present Staffs alternative and the option of keeping
and/or modifying the existing pattern of Stop Sign within Indian River Estates. It was the majority decision of the
residents present to keep the existing Stop signs in place and add multi way stops at the intersections of Sunset
Blvd., and Scott Street, Sunset Blvd. and Bradley Street and at the intersections of Easy Street with Buchanan
Drive, Myrtle Drive, and Tangelo Drive.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
BCC Approval of Stop Signs on Bartow, Dec. 2, 2003 Agenda Item #7
Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution Numbers 04-59 and 04-60 establishing multi way stops at
the intersections of Sunset Blvd., and Scott Street, Sunset Blvd. and Bradley Street and at the intersections of
Easy Street with Buchanan Drive, Myrtle Drive, and Tangelo Drive.
r
COMMISSION ACTION:
1CJ APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER Approved 5-0
Dou sAnderson
County Administrator
[x] County Attorney
[ ] County Engineer
[ ] Purchasing Dept.
~
Coordination/Signatures
[ ] Mgt. & Budget
[ ] Project. Mgr.
[ ] Other
(,] P"""Wo,,", "'. ~
[ ] Com Dev Director
MultiwayStpsEasy&PalrnDr
\.w
'WI
-.
ITEM NO. C - 4C
DATE: February 17, 2004
AGENDA REQUEST
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [X]
~-
TO: BOARD OF, COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115
PRESENTED BY:
Michael Powley, P.E.
County Engineer
SUBJECT: Request for a Public Hearing on St. Lucie Citrus Mining Permit Application.
BACKGROUND: The proposed St Lucie Citrus Mine is located in south central St. Lucie County south of
Okeechobee Road along east side of Ideal Holding Road. There has not been any previous mining activity on
this site.
FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A.
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval for a public hearing to be held on March 16, 2004 or
soon thereafter to consider the request of the St. Lucie Citrus Mining Permit Application.
[ ] APPROVED
" OTHER:
[ ] DENIED
-...
COMMISSION ACTION:
Pulled prior to
meeting.
Douglas Anderson
County Administrator
(x]County Attorney X
(x]Originating Dept. pu~orks~
(x]Eng/MSBU Coor.
Coordination/Sianatures
¡'ICom. De'.~"'W'
(]BudgeURevenue'C ord.
(]Mgt. & Budget ~
(x]Env. Res. DiV(lt 'J)t\'B
..
\....
.....,
ITEM NO. C- 4D
DATE: February 17,2004
AGENDA REQUEST
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [ x]
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): ENGINEERING DIVISION (4115)
PRESENTED BY:
~~~
Michael V. Powley, P. .
County Engineer
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT:
To commit to cost share with the Florida Department of Transportation in the completion of the Indian River Lagoon Trace
shared-use pathway and forward the attached letter. Attached is correspondence discussing the proposed arrangement.
BACKGROUND:
The Indian River Lagoon Trace _pathway project is located on South Hutchinson Island from approximately the south
county line to the Fort Pierce city limits along the east side ofSR A-I-A. The project was broken up into three phases.
Phase I is located south of the Florida Power and Light power plant and approximately three and a half (3.5) miles in
length. Phase I is in the process of being completed. Phase II is located north of the FP&L power plant and is
approximately seven miles in length. Phase III is located inside the FP&L power plant property and is approximately one
mile in length.
The design for Phase I was completed by Glatting Jackson. Phase I was broken up into three sub-sections because of the
availability of funding. The construction ofthe first two sub-sections has been completed with the third sub-section
anticipated to start construction later this year. The FDOT has agreed to assist with some funding for the third sub-section
of Phase I. The design for Phase II was begun by Glatting Jackson early in the year 2000, with subsequently little progress
due to the mitigation requirements for the environmental impacts. At this time there is no consultant on contract for design
of construction plans for Phase III.
The FDOT is currently designing a resurfacing project ofSR A-I-A from the FP&L power plant north to the Fort Pierce
city limits. At staffs request the FDOT has included a pathway across the FP&L property, which includes crossings at
both FP&L's intake and discharge canal at no cost to the County. These limits correspond to the County's Phase III. Staff
made a request ofFDOT to incorporate the County's Phase II, from the north side of the FP&L power plant to the Fort
Pierce City Limits, pathway with their resurfacing project. The FDOT agreed to incorporate the pathway into their plans
and construct it, if the C6unty would agree to pay $1,750,000 for wetland impact mitigation and $691,323.82 for incidental
work that would be necessary to accommodate the pathway.
The mitigation cost would have to be paid even ifthe County constructed the pathway without FDOT help. If the County
were to construct the pathway the total cost would be approximately $3 to $4 million not including mitigation. If the
FDOT constructs the pathway with their resurfacing project, they will be responsible for all permitting and inspection.
After the FDOT project is completed, the County must still return and construct the recreational enhancements at the
County parks.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: :Sl.3000
Funds in the amount of$2.5 million dollars will be made available the fiscal year 2005 in Fund No.1 01 006-4116-563005-4904
Transportation TrustlImpact Fees: Funds to come from road impact fees and/or alternative funding
sources.
~.
\...,
'wi
PREVIOUS ACTION:
September 1998 - Board granted conceptual approval to plans for development of pathway.
April 20, 1999 - Board approved work authorization with consultant, Glatting Jackson, for design and permitting in the
amount of$149,000.
October 12, 1999 - Board approved Change Order No.1 to contract for environmental requirements.
December 2, 1999 - Board approved Change Order No.2 for additional services to obtain permits.
July 18, 2000 - Board granted permission to advertise fo~ bids.
August 2000 - Bids were opened for Phase I and all exceeded the budgeted amount. They were subsequently rejected.
February 6, 2001 - Board approved Work Authorization No.5 to the contract C98-01-216 with Glatting Jackson in the
amount not to exceed $5,000 for design services for the Indian River Lagoon Trace.
May 8, 2001 - Board approved the awarding of the contract for construction of Phase IA and Phase IE to Dickerson of
Florida, Inc. in the amount of $990,038.
June 4, 2003 - Board approved Work Authorization No.5 to the contract COI-05-497 with Glatting Jackson in the amount
not to exceed $9,700 for design services for the Indian River Lagoon Trace.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Board approval to commit to cost share in the amount of $2.5 million do liars with the Florida Department of
Transportation in the completion of the Indian River Lagoon Trace shared-use pathway and authorize the chairman to sign the
attached letter to commit to the cost sharing.
[x] County Attorney
[x] Originating De ,P
[x] Finance
(Check for copy 0 y,'
[] DENIED
Approved 5-0 Dougl sAnderson
County Administrator
¡,¡ M~. & B,d". UJ) {Ylfll ~ [x] P""hM;', ~
[x] Project Man. ~'"' ~ \., ' [x] Department Rev. Coor, t\
[X]Env.Res.Div,rr_ ~~, [x]Com.Dev. ,~~-
COMMISSION ACTION:
[1(APPROVED
rJOTHER
r
, La ~
~
....,¡
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO.5
DATE: Feb. 17,2004
~'
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [x]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY: DON MCLAM
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CENTRAL SERVICES
SUBJECT: BID #04-022/ DOLLMAN PARK RIVERSIDE (WEST)
BACKGROUND: On February 4, 2004, Bid #02-044 was opened for Dollman Park Riverside (West).
Seven hundred and ten (710) vendors were notified, forty-three (43) bid documents was
distributed and two (2) responses were received. Staff recommends award to Sunshine Land
Design for a total amount of $49,773.20.
FUNDS AVAIL: 310002-7240-563000-76020 (Improvements OIT Buildings)
PREVIOUS ACTION: BOCC approval to advertise Invitation For Bid, January 6,2004, Item No. c-
Bb.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid #04-022 Dollman Park Riverside (West) to
Sunshine Land Design for a total amount of $49,773.20 and authorization for the Chairman to sign
the contract as prepared by the County Attorney.
MISSION ACTION:
~. APPROVED [] DENIED
r]' OTHER: Approved 5-0
ou :Anderson
County Administrator
.tÇurchaSing Mgr.: {;{ P
Other:
Coordination/Signatures
County Attorney: ~
Originating D~\.."-'<. \v
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable)
Eft. 1/97
H:\AGENDA\AGENDA-DOLLMAN (WEST) .DOC
) ~ ..
~ ~
AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 6A
DATE: February 17, 2004
REGULAR []
PUBLIC HEARING []
CONSENT [X]
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Administration
TO: Board of County Commissioners
SUBJECT: . Housing Finance Authority Appointment
BACKGROUND: Commissioner Barnes has requested that Mr. Thomas D. Siplin serve as his appointee
on the Housing Finance Authority.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/ A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board ratify Commissioner Barnes appointment of Mr.
Thomas D. Siplin to the Housing Finance Authority.
. APPROVED
If OTHER:
[] DENIED
COMMISSION ACTION:
r
Approved 5-0
Dougl s M. Anderson
County Administrator
Review and Approvals
County Attorney: _ Management & Budget: _
Originating Dept: _ Other:
Finance: _ (Check for Copy only, if applicable)
Purchasing: _
Other:
Effective: 5/96
~ """'-~..
'-
...."
ITEM NO. C-ôB
DATE: February 17, 2004
AGENDA REQUEST
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ADMINISTRATION
REGULAR: ( )
PUBLIC HEARING: ( )
CONSENT: (X)
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT:
Dr. Edwin Massey, President of Indian River Community College requests the Board of County
Commissioners send a letter of thanks to Governor Bush for his favorable budget proposal, and to the
Legislative Delegation aSk,ing their support of the Governor's budget proposal.
BACKGROUND:
See attached information packet from Dr. Edwin Massey
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Board to send letters to the Governor
and the Legislative Delegation on behalf of Indian River Community College's request and authorize
Chairman to sign.
c]t\PPROVED
o OTHER:
r 0 DENIED
Approved 5-0
COMMISSION ACTION:
Review and Approvals
o County Attorney:
o Management and Budget:
o Purchasing:
o Originating Dept:
.Q Other:
o Other:
o Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable:
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 772-462-1777
or TTD 772-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting.
·
'-'
....,J
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
6A
2/17/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[]
[ Xl"...
Quasi-JD [ X J.....-..
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
BACKGROUND:
Consider Draft Resolution 03-241 approving the re uest of Reitano Enterpri s, Inc. for a
change in zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning distric to the CG
(Commercial General) zoning district for property located on the east side 0 Koblegard
Road, approximately 330 feet north of the intersection of Indrio Road and Koblegard
Road to March 18,2004. (File No.: CU-03-043).
At the December 2, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners continued the petition of
Reitano Enterprises, Inc. to rezone a 2.15-acre tract of land located on the east side of
Koblegard Road, approximately 330 feet north of the intersection of Indrio Road and
Koblegard Road, from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning district to the CG
(Commercial, General) zoning district until February 17, 2004. The reason for the
continuance was to include the parcel of land into the North County Charrette and
determine whether or not the proposed use is consistent with the outcome of the final
charrette plan.
SUBJECT:
The North County Charrette has been scheduled for the week of February 7 through the
13th, which will conclude with a public presentation of the outcome of the charrette input
on February 13, 2004. After this additional meetings will be held for the acceptance and
adoption of the final charrette master plan, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Land
Development Code amendments that may result from the charrette outcome.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
Based upon the charrette hot concluding until February 13', 2004 staff recommends that
the applicant's petition be continued for a minimum of 30 days, March 16, 2004.
N/A
At the December 2, 2003 public hearing, the Board of County Commissioners
continued the public hearing on this matter until February 17, 2004.
RECOMMENDATION:
r
At the November 20, 2003 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission, by
a vote of 8-0, with one member absent (Mr. Trias), recommended approval of the
applicant's request for a change in zoning.
Staff recommends continuing the public hearing on Draft Resolution 03-241, for 30
days (March 18, 2004) to allow for the drafting of the North County Charrette report.
Approved 5-0
CURRENCE:
COMMISSION ACTION:
~ APPROVED
c=J OTHER
D DENIED
~
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Coordination! Signatures
County Attomey
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
:~
Mgt. & Budget:
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works:
Other:
J-l,lt / ~~'
f(
~'rd\
'-"
....,
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
S/3
2/17/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
To:
Submitted By:
~
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
Consider Draft Resolution 04-009 approving the request of Palms &
Tropical Trees Depot, Inc. for a change in zoning from he AG-1
(Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning district to the IL (Industrial Light) zoning
district for property located on the west side of Kings Highway,
approximately 2,500 feet south of Angle Road, directly south of the
existing Kraft Garden Nursery. (File No.: RZ-03-044).
,,\l-
(/\'
BACKGROUND:
Attached is a copy of the petition of Palms & Tropical Trees Depot, Inc.,
for a change in zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning
district to the IL (Industrial Light) zoning district, for a 20.41-acre tract of
land located on the west side of Kings Highway, approximately 2,500 feet
south of Angle Road, directly south of the existing Kraft Garden Nursery.
The applicant has indicated that the purpose of this change in zoning is
to allow for the construction of an industrial park.
The permitted uses in the IL (Industrial light) zoning district are not
expected to negatively impact the existing uses in the surrounding area or
place additional demands on public services in the area.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
At the January 15, 2004 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning
Commission, by a vote of 7-1, with one member absent (Mr. Akins),
recommended approval of the applicant's request for a change in
zoning.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-009.
r
Approved 5-0
D glas M. Anderson
ounty Administrator
COMMISSION ACTION: RRENCE:
~ APPROVED D DENIED
c=J OTHER
Coordination! Signatures
County Attorney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
í,ft
Mgt. & Budget:
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works: Ah't' I ~,
Other: . / rm
\ Ý'ft...{\
v -
~
....J
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
--
be-
2/17/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Cómmissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
Consider Draft Resolution 04-012 approving the request of Carlos unoz Quintana,
for a Major Adjustment to an existing Minor Site Plan and Condition I Use Permit to
allow the construction of a 9,040 square foot second story addition to the PSL
Moving & Storage Depot mini-warehouse and self-storage facility (File No.:
SPMN-03-008 and CUMJ-03-003)
"-
BACKGROUND:
On March 7, 2000, this Board, via Resolution 00-007, granted Minor Site Plan __
approval and Conditional Use Permit approval for the PSL Moving & Storage
Depot. The developers are now applying for a Major Adjustment to the existing Site
Plan and Conditional Use Permit to allow the addition of a 9,040 square foot second
story: The developer is proposing to utilize the additional 9,040 square feet for mini-
warehousing and storage use.
The proposed second story addition at the PSL Moving & Storage Depot facility
has been determined not to have an undue or adverse effect upon nearby properties.
The subject property is surrounded by commercial uses to the north, south and east
and residential uses to the west. The proposed project is consistent with the existing
commercial development patterns along South US Highway One.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-012.
r
OCJ APPROVED
D OTHER
D DENIED
CURRENCE:
- ·'1
COMMISSION ACTION:
Approved 5-0
ouglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Coordination! Signatures
County Attorney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
>'~'
Mgt. & Budget:
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works: ~.~
Engineering: ¡(tv, /
Other: - ¡
. \\;,i Y)
,,:
~
.....,
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
..-
.6b
Feb. 17, 2004
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Cómmissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
Consider Draft Resolution 04-006 granting approval to th petition of Reserve Ho es Ltd., for
a Change in Zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) Zoning istrict to the
PUD (Planned Unit Development) Zoning District and Final Planned Unit evelopment
approval for the project known as Parcel 21 @ The Reserve (Brlarcllff) a 33-lot single-
family residential subdivision. (File No.: RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016)
tor
BACKGROUND:
Reserve Homes, Ltd., has submitted a Final Planned Unit development site plan for Parcel 21
@ the Reserve (a/kIa Briarcliff). The overall Master Plan for the Reserve identified Parcel 21
as a 10.232-acre tract of land that was originally to include 35 residential units, with a net site
density of 3.42 dulacre. Reserve Homes, Ltd is now proposing to complete the development
of this parcel as a 33-lot single-family unit residential development.
Parcel 21 @ the Reserve, is part of the Reserve, a Development of Regional Impact (DRI).
The Reserve DRI is approved for a total of 4,100 dwelling units; four golf courses; 1,600,000
square feet of industrial development; 290,000 square feet of commercial development;
100,000 square feet of office space and 250 hotel/motel rooms. As of this date, approximately
1,124 dwelling units have been permitted for construction, and another 609 units have
received site plan approval but have not yet been built.
The proposed subdivision and Final Development Plan is consistent with the approved DRI,
existing and proposed land uses in the area, and with the previously approved Preliminary
Development Plan for the area known as PUD II @ the Reserve.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
r
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-006 approving the petitioner's request for
final Plan Unit Development for a 33-lot single-family residential subdivision to be known as
Parcel 21 @ the Reserve (BriarcJiff), subject to the limiting conditions contained therein.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approved 5-0
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
COMMISSION ACTION:
[X] APPROVED
c=J OTHER
D DENIED
Coordinationl Signatures
County Attorney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
ct--
LA
¡'¡N,\'
Mgt. & Budget:
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works:
Other;
'--'
....,
Agenda Request
Item Number: s· t.
MeetinQ Date: Feb, 17, 2004
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
Consider Draft Resolution 04-013, approving the request of Robert Stieg e, Centerline
Homes, for a change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential Single-family - 2 du/acre)
zoning district to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) zoning district and Preliminary and
Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval for an 84-unit townhouse project to be
known as Shadow Oaks @ 1D-Mile Creek, for property located at the southwest corner
of South 25th Street and Ten Mile Creek. (File No.: RZ-03-031, PUD-03-020)
BACKGROUND:
Robert Stiegele, Centerline Homes, the developer of Shadow Oaks @ 10-Mile Creek is
requesting a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-family - 2 dulacre)
zoning district to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) Zoning District and Preliminary
and Final PUD approval for the construction of an 84-unit townhouse project on a
42.07-acre parcel of land to be known as Shadow Oaks @ Ten Mile Creek.
On December 2, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners granted a shoreline
variance to allow construction of the onsite roadways within 100 feet of the 300-foot
shoreline setback zone, the construction of units 31-38 and 43-47 within 30 feet of the
existing wetland and construction of two stormwater ponds within 50 feet of the
shoreline.
The proposed Preliminary and Final Development Plan is consistent with the existing and
proposed land uses and development patterns in the area.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
At the January 15, 2004 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission
forwarded the petition with a recommendation of approval by a vote of 7-1, with one
member absent (Mr. Akins).
r
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-013 approving the petitioners
request for change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-family - 2 dulacre)
zoning district to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) zoning district and Preliminary
and Final PUD approval for an 84-unit townhouse project to be known as Shadow
Oaks @ 1 O-Mlle Creek, subject to the limiting conditions contained therein.
RECOMMENDATION:
Approved 5-0
CURRENCE:
COMMISSION ACTION:
I :Å APPROVED D DENIED
c=:J OTHER
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Coordinationl Signatures
County Atto~ney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
~
y
Mgt. & Budget:
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works:
Other:
'-"
..,¡
Agenda Request
Item Number
Date:
S-f"
02117/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
~.
SUBJECT:
er
Consider Draft Resolution 04-015 granting a Variance from Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a)(2)
of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - St. Lucie River Shoreline Setbacks,
for property located at 6414 Riverland Drive.
Presented By
~.
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Public Works
BACKGROUND:
Petition of Joseph and Laura Vardalis through agent Dennis Corrick, for a Variance from
Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - Sl Lucie
River Shoreline Setbacks, to allow for the continued use of a deck within 75 feet of the
Mean Higl1 Water line of the St. Lucie River. (File No.: BCC-04-001)
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-015.
r
c3 COMMISSION ACTION:
APPROVED 0 DENIED
'='
r tl OTHER
L:-..:J Approved 5-0
CURRENCE:
County A.omey t~
Originating Dept.: ~
Finance: (
~oordinationl Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Purchasing: .._~
Other: ~ _
C~·WeJ)
\..t
.""""
Agenda Request
Item Number
Date:
--
06-
02/17/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
SUBJECT:
Consider the continuation of the applicati~e Glassman Holdings, LLC for a
Change to the Future Land Use Map of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive
Plan until March 16,2004.
Glassman Holdings, LLC, proposes a change in Future Land Use classification
from RE (Residential Estate - 2 du/ac) to RU (Residential Urban - 5 du/ac) and
movement of the Urban Service Boundary Line approximately 1,050 feet to the
west to incorporate the parcel (File No: PA-03-002). The 47.96 acre site is
located northwest of the intersection of Indrio Road and Emerson Avenue in the
area currently under review as part of the North County Charrette.
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
BACKGROUND:
The amendment site's existing future land use designation allows for residential
uses at 2 dwelling units per acre or a total of 96 dwelling units. The proposed
change to RU would allow a maximum of 5 dwelling units per acre or 240 total
dwelling units. The applicant stated intent is to develop the property with 140
single-family homes, which would result in an overall density of almost 3
dwelling units per acre.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
At the June 19, 2003, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County
Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 5 to 3, recommended denial of
the requested change in future land use classification from the RE
(Residential Estate) and RU (Residential Urban).
r
On September 2, 2003, the Commission tabled the consideration of the
transmittal of an amendment until February 17, 2004.
Continue the application of Glassman Holdings, LLC, for a change in Future
Land Use classification from RE (Residential, Estate) to RU (Residential,
Urban) until M~rch 16,2004.
RECOMMENDATION:
COMMISSION ACTION:
CXJ APPROVED
CJ OTHER
D DENIED
Approved 5-0
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
__Jrdination/ Signatures
Mgt. & Budget;
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
~
To:
Submitted By:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
r
RECOMMENDATION:
COMMISSION ACTION:
[¥J.. .. APPROVED
~ OTHER
Motion to object (Failed 3-2)
Comm. Bruhn - No
Comm. Hutchinson - No
"""
Agenda Request
5~Þ{
02/17/04
Item Number
Date:
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
Consider Draft Resolution 04-011 granting a Change in Zoning fro the RMH-5
(Residential, Mobile-Home - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning
District for property located at the northwest corner of the intersection of St. Lucie
Boulevard and Hammond Road.
The petitioner, John M. Dunn, has requested this change in zoning from the RMH-5
(Residential, Mobile-Home - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning
District on property located at 2835 Hammond Road, (the northwest corner of the
intersection of St. Lucie Boulevard and Hammond Road) in order to allow the property to
be utilized as a base of operations for his heavy equipment contract ring business. The
subject property is located to the wesVsouthwest of the St. Lucie County International
. Airport and north of property currently zoned and used for light industrial purposes.
N/A
At the January 15, 2004, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning
and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 2 (Mr. McCurdy and Mr. Lounds) with one
member (Mr. Akins) absent, recommended denial of the requested change in zoning to
the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District.
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-011.
D DENIED
-
Comm. Lewis - No
Staff recommendation Approved
5-0
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
~~/
Comm. Barnes - No
Comm. Coward - No
Coordination! Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
,.y,. . COMMISSION ACTION: .
~ APPROVED D DENIED
c:J OTHER Approved 5-0
'-'
To:
Submitted By:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
r
RECOMMENDATION:
County Attomey"
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
...."
Agenda Request
Item Number
Date:
~. :r
02117/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
Consider Draft Resolution 04-016 granting a ajor Adjustment to n Existing
Conditional Use Permit to allow for the expansion of an existing free-stan ing drinking
place and retail liquor (distilled and un-distilled) store in the CG (Commercial, General)
Zoning for the Lakewood Park Liquor Store on property located at 4902 North Kings
Highway (Indrio Crossing Shopping Center).
The petitioner, Ranjana Patel, operates the Lakewood Park Liquor & Pub in the Indrio
Crossings Shopping Center. On March 13, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners
granted approval, through Resolution 90-72, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a
package liquor store and lounge for the subject property located at 4902 North Kings
Highway. The purpose of the Major Adjustment is to allow for the expansion of the retail
sale of liquor (distilled and undistilled) for off-site consumption into additional square
footage at the shopping center..
The proposed Major Adjustment has been determined to meet the standards of review
as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and is
not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the SI. Lucie County
Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is not expected to
adversely impact the surrounding area or properties. The existing and proposed
location is within an existing shopping center, which is zoned for general commercial
uses. The proposed use is not expected to create significant demands on any of the
public facilities in this area.
N/A
On March 13, 1990, through Resolution 90-72, this Board granted a conditional use
permit to allow a package liquor store and lounge to be known as Lakewood Park
Liquor Store in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District.
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-016.
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
t9-t'/
Coordination! Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
\..;
....I
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
5- J
Feb 17, 2004
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ x]
]
[ ]
[ x ]
Quasi-JD [
BACKGROUND:
Consider Draft Ordinance 04-003, amending the SI. Lucie County d Development Code y creating
section 3,01.03(EE) Cpub, Conservation - Public, Zoning District and by amending Section 7.04, 1, Table
7-10 to provide for minimum lot standards for this new zoning district
Draft Ordinance 04-003, proposes to Create new Zoning District to be known as Cpub (CONSERVATION-
PUBLIC). This Zoning District will correspond to the newly created Conservation Public, Future Land Use
Category, that was created as part of recent amendments to the County Comprehensive Plan. The uses
within this Zoning District are limited to parks and other related conservation! habitat protection uses, This
zoning designation will only be applied to properties that are in public ownership. Privately held property,
even if it is open to public use, would not be a candidate site for the application of this zoning district.
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County C9mmissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
On January 15, 2004, the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency for Sf. Lucie County
held a public hearing on this matter. At the conclusion of that hearing, the Board voted 8-0 to recommend
that the County Commission approve Draft Ordinance 04-003. In forwarding this recommendation to the
Board; the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency for SI. Lucie County made the
following amendments to parts (2), (7) and (8) of this draft Ordnance.
2, Permitted Uses
a, CII!l\¡ral astivities aRå RaI¡'¡Fe exl1iÞitieRs. ¡g99)
b, Public Conservation areas. includina hikine. canoeina. fishine. bird watchina.
Dicnickina. nature exhibits and all existina uses that are not neaativelv affectina the
Duroose of the Dublic Durchase., (999)
s, Pllblis PaFks aRå RÐ8reatieR .~.Feas (999)
å. Pslise 8. Fire PmteGlÏsR (9221,9221)
e. ResreatisRal IIcsti. 'ities, ¡g99)
7. Conditional Uses
a. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10,23 (999)
b, HeliDOrt landina/takeoff Dads, (999)
b, Restaurants, (Includina the sale of alcoholic beveraaes for on-premises
consumDtion onlv,) (999)
8. Accessory Uses
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following:
a.
Detached single-family dwelling unit or mobile home, for on-site security purposes.
(999)
ÞlelipsFllaRåiRgAakeslf paås, (999)
RestallraRts, (IRSl\låiRg tl1e sale ef alsel1elis Þo"eFages fer eR premises
GÐRsllmptisR sRly.) (009)
r
8.
S.
RECOMMENDATION:
No action is required from the County Commission at this time. This is the first of two required public
hearings on this matter. The second public hearing on this matter will be held on Tuesday, March 2, 2004,
at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible.
c=J APPROVED
~ OTHER
D DENIED
No action required at
this time.
-
COMMISSION ACTION:
ouglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
County Attomey
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
~9..}--
Coordination! Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
(agend772)
"-'
....,.¡
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
!)= /<
Feb 17, 2004
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ x]
]
[ ]
[ x ]
Quasi-JD [
BACKGROUND:
Consider general amendments to the County's zoning maps consisten with recent
changes to the County Future Land Use Maps.
As part of the general amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan that were
reviewed and approved by this Board some time ago, the County made several changes
to the Future Land Use designations effecting a number of publicly owned parcels in the
community. As part of the process to bring the zoning designation of those parcels in
line with the land use designations applied to them, staff has prepared a series of
amendments to the county's zoning maps that address those land use changes.
nt Director
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
The attached map series indicates those areas of the community where these changes
will take place. In general, what we are seeking to do is apply the new Cpub zoning
designation to these areas of the community that have a Cpub (Conservation Public)
Future Land Use designation; apply a utility or industrial designation to those lands
around the airport that currently are zoned for residential use but that have been
acquired by the County for the purposes of airport development or noise abatement
(such as the Ridgehaven Subdivision area); and to apply a more appropriate zoning
designation to a number of existing schools, parks and other public facilities throughout
the County. Because of the areas involved with some of these properties, small-scale
maps are not possible to produce. I have attached several larger scale maps that I
believe adequately highlight the areas under amendment consideration, however if you
have about any of them please let me know.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
r
On January 15, 2004, the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency for
St. Lucie County held a public hearing to review these amendments; copies of the
minutes of that meeting are attached for your review. At the conclusion of that hearing,
the Board voted 8-0 to recommend that the County Commission approve the indicated
amendments to the County's zoning maps.
The Public Hearing set for February 17, 2004, was intended to be the first of two
scheduled public hearings on this matter. However, we have been advised that some
members of the community felt the published notice for these changes, while complaint
with the County's notification procedures, was not adequate or legible enough in its
published form for all interested persons to understand. Accordingly, at this time I would
request that the Board withhold any action on this matter and we will re-notice the
hearings on this topic with a more pronounced newspaper ad and if the Board feels it
appropriate, mailed notices to all property owners within or adjacent to the effected
areas.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
COMMISSION ACTION:
o APPROVED
Ci) OTHER
D DENIED
No action required at
this time.
ENCE:
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
()~
~I
Coordination! Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
(agend773)
~
"""
ITEM NO.6
DATE: February 17. 2004
AGENDA REQUEST
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ADMINISTRATION
REGULAR: (X)
PUBLIC HEARING: ( )
CONSENT: ( )
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT: Purchase of Harbor Branch Shrimp Property
BACKGROUND:
See áttached memorandum
FUNDS AVAILABLE: 001-9910-599100-800 General Contingency $10,400
Budget Amendment # 04-137 I CAP 04-082
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that we allocate $10,400 from Contingency to perform
appraisals and due diligence as the first step in acquiring this property. Staff is recommending that we
allocate an amount from Contingency not to exceed $10,400 to perform the appraisals and title work on this
property and approve BA #04-137 and CAP 04-082.
o APPROVED
¡OTHER:
r 0 DENIED
Re-agenda for 2/24/04 more
infonnation requested.
COMMISSION ACTION:
Do g;¿ Anderson
County Administrator
Review and Approvals
º County Attorney:
o Management and Budget:
o Purchasing:
o Originating Dept:
o Other:
o Other:
º Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable:
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 772-462-1777
or TTD 772-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting.
H:\WIN\O WORDIAGENDAW\HBOIAGENDA.DOC
'-
....J
Agenda Request
Item Number:
Meetin~ Date:
t. - 2A
2/17/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[X]
[ ]
[ ]
Quasi-JD [
To:
Submitted By:
~
Board of County Gommissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
Request to approve Budget Amendment No. 04-134 for $5,000 and Equipment
Request No. EO 04-238 for the purchase of traffic counters.
BACKGROUND:
Each year the MPO division of the Community Development Department has
~ received approval from FDOT to purchase traffic counters with federal funds.
Previous years required an 18% local match from Road and Bridge.
The local match is no longer required. FDOT approved $10,000 in federal funds
for the purchase of traffic counters for this fiscal year, in compliance with the
UPWP plan for transportation planning. $5,000 is already in the approved MPO
b!Jdget. The additional $5,000 will be moved through the attached budget
amendment. . '
The traffic counters will be housed at the Road and Bridge division of Public
'1), Works and paid with 100% federal funding.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
001149-1510-564000-100 - Capital Equipment MPO Grant $5,000
PREVIOUS ACTION:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of BA #04-134 and EO #04-238 for traffic counters.
r
COMMISSION ACTION:
[jJ APPROVED
c=I OTHER
D DENIED
Approved 5-0
RRENCE:
ouglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
County Attorney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
Coordination! Signatures
Y Mgt. & Budget: ~
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works:
Other:
_~.______ _..___ n____..______________ ____
'-'
.....,
Agenda Request
Item NumberC" c98
Date: February 17, 2004
~
, ~'
,
Consent
Regular
Public
Presentation
Leg. [ ]
[X ]
[ ]
[ ]
Quasi-JD [
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
Approval of the Commissioner's Award for Art For Nature Spring Plei . Air 2004
\
This yêars Art For Nature Spring Plein Air will be hosted by the Backus Gallery
with an opening reception and auction of paintings donated for the benefit of the
ESL program on March 19, 2004. Last year the Art For Nature Spring Plein Air
artists donated 31 paintings that raised $6,931 for the County's ESL fund. This
year we expect the event to be larger than last years with the potential to raise
greater fu~ds for the ~reservation of lands through our ESL program.
,bast year, the Commission approved a $100 award for the best painting of lands
purchased through the Environmentally Significant Lands (ESL) program. This
year we are requesting your approval to increase the Commissjoner's Award to
$250.00.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:'
r
{)O!-/5/!:; - ~(J""-I(JO
N/A
Approve a $250 Commissioners Award for the Best ESL painting created
during the 2004 Art For Nature Spring Plein Air event. The award shall be
given to the artist whose painting best portrays one of the County's ESL sites.
00 APPROVED
c:=J OTHER
CJ DENIED
- Approved 5-0
las M. Anderson
. CountyÄdministrator
COMMISSION ACTION:
-
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
y
Coordination! Signatures
Mgt. & Budget: ~
Other: ~9
Purchasing:
Other:
.. ~. (insert file ref)
.---- -_.~..__._-------_..
'-'
'-tII
Agenda Request
Item Number ¿... S-:L.. .
February 17,
2004
Date:
y'
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[X ]
[ ]
[ ]
Quasi-JD [
~'
BACKGROUND:
Board of County Commissioners Presented By
Community Development \i\Â .' ,
-:/ elopme t Di ector
Request approval of the Third Amendment to the Consultant Agreeme (It between
Janus Research Inc. and St. Lucie County Board of County Commissionets.
The subject agreement provides for the attendance of the Consultant at an upcoming
public meeting regarding the proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance. The first public
meeting regarding the proposed ordinance was held on January 28, 2004 at the White
City Elementary School. An estimated 100 people attended the meeting and there was
a great deal of discussion on both sides of the issue. Given the high level of interest in
the ordinance, staff has scheduled a second public meeting on February 25, 2004, at
the St;.Lucie School House in St. Lucie Village. The third amendment will allow Ellen
Uguccioni, Historical Preservation Planner to attend that meeting. The amendment is
attached for your review.
To:
Submitted By:
SUBJECT:
r
Funds are available in account number 102-:-/5"10-531000-100 (Professional
Services ).
On May 7, 2002, the Commission approved staff recommendation to award· the
Historical Resources RFP to Janus Research Inc.
On December 17, 2002, the Commission approved the First Amendment to the
Consult Agreement to extended the expiration date and include a survey of historic
roadways.
On September 2, 2003, the Commission approved the Second Amendment included
the submission of FMSF forms and attendance at five meetings/hearings regarding
the ordinance.
Approve the Third Amendment to the Consultant Agreement between Janus
Research Inc. and St. Lucie County to include the Consultants attendance at. an
additional public meeting regarding the Historical Preservation Ordinance.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
r
RECOMMENDATION:
, COMMISSION ACTION:
~ APPROVED c::J DENIED
c=J OTHER Approved 5-0
NCURRENCE:
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
:;;y
Coordination!. ~~na~;~
Mgt. & Budget: ~fJl
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
(AGEND595a)
-- --- ---
._. _.__ ____ ____ou·
'-
....,
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
t~ ....2D
2/17/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[XX]
[ ]
[ ]
Quasi-JD [
SUBJECT:
Resolution No. 04-32 to accept FDOT federal funds approved 0 February
6,2004 in the amount of $50,000. These funds will be used to pay 59% of
the North County Charrette Design Study, being held 217/04 through
2/13/04, by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council.
...
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
BACKGROUND:
-".
St. Lucie County MPO submitted an amendment for the FY '03/04 UPWP
for additional PL funds to the overall approved budget to include a subtask.
This subtask is a North County Charrette to be conducted by the Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) for St. Lucie County. The MPO
is allocated approximately 59% of the total $85,000 charrette cost as a
partner agency (passing funds through to the County as the prime agency).
The TCRPC will be paid with County funds initially with MPO funds
reimbursement in the amount of $50,000.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
Funds to be placed into: 001149-1510-531000-100 -- MPO Professional
Services.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
Board approved the agreement with TCRPC for Design Charrette and
Town Planning Services for North St. Lucie County per contract C04-01-
026, in January 27, 2004.
RECOMMENDATION;..
Recommend approval of Resolution No. 04-32, for $50,000.
r
~\ APPROVED
c=J OTHER
D DENIED
Approved 5-0
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
COMMISSION ACTION:
County Attorney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
(Y
Coordination! Signatures
Mgt. & Budget: ~
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works:
Other:
'-"
....¡
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. --3A-
DATE: February 17, 2004
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING []
CONSENT [x]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney
Daniel S. McIntyre
County Attorney
SUBJECT:
Resolution 04-57 - Permanent Slope Easement
Lennard Road MSBU
Frank and Sandra Lagana
Parcel 23 - Tax I.D. #3414-501-0608-000/0
BACKGROUND:
A Contract fo.r Sale and Purchase for right-of-way on Lennard Road was
approved by the Board on October 7, 2003. For the purpose of tying in and
harmonizing the property with the roadway, a Permanent Slope Easement was
needed which Mr. and Mrs. Lagana have donated to the County.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION: On October 7, 2003 - the Board approved a Contract for Sale and Purchase
of right-of-way needed from Mr. and Mrs. Lagana for the Lennard Road MSBU
project.
June 6, 2000 - Initial Public Hearing held. Board of County Commissioners
approved the Lennard Road MSBU project to provide roadway, water and sewer
improvements and authorized staff to proceed with design and permitting.
November, 2001· - Second Public Hearing held. Adopted Preliminary
Assessment Roll. Approval to commence construction.
RECOMMEN6ATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute
Resolution No. 04-57 accepting the Permanent Slope Easement and instruct
staff to record Resolution No. 04-57 in the Public Records of St. Lucie
County, Florida.
[X APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0
-
COMMISSION ACTION:
Do glas M. Anderson
County Administrator
{XI c,",ty Att""" ):"
[x ] Originating Dept: .1rv-'-
Review and AÞÞrovals
{xl P.blk W"ks~ [xl E'9,,,,,,,,g,J!JYP
[ ) Road and Bridge: [ ] Community Dev:
'--
....1
8/22/03: PO # 2313379 for Scientific Environmental Services for Soil Sampling in the amount of
$10,050.00.
9/30/03: PO #2313589 for Dredging & Marine Consultants, Inc. for Grant Coordination and Permit
Finalization in the amount of $19,990.00.
2/04/04: Approval of contract with DMC Engineering in the amount of $24,970.00 for preparation of bid
documents & specifications.
-'
RECOMMENDATION: Public Works Staff recommends approval of Work Authorization No.4 with BCI
Engineers and Scientists, Inc. in the amount of $7494.00 for design of Upland Material Management
area for Taylor Creek Dredging and authorization for signature by the Chairman.
COMMISSION ACTION:
XJ. APPROVED
~ d OTHER:
o DENIED
Approved 5-0
glas Anderson
County Administrator
Review and ADWts-
. OrigInating Dapt: (Pub. Wk..1 1f~'. County Attorney: .' . n '.
181 Purchasing: qJ P (0 Parks & Recreation:
, 'J 1 181 Management and Budget: ~j)lr/rII!:t
o Environmental Lands:
181 Finance:
o Other
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager
at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting.
r
'-'
....J
ITEM NO. 4b
DATE: February 17, 2004
AGENDA REQUEST
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING []
CONSENT [X]
TO:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY: ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION (4110)
. Scott Herring, P. E.
Road & Bridge Manager
SUBJECT:
Establishing Multi Way Stops on Easy Street and on Palm Drive in Indian River Estates.
BACKGROUND:
At the December 2, 2003 County Commission Meeting, the Board directed staff to install multi way stops on
Bartow Street in Indian River Estates and to present a plan to the Indian River Estates Homeowners Association
on alternative placement of stop sign in Indian River Estates. Staff attended the meeting of the Indian River
Estates Homeowners Association on January 28, 2004 to present Staffs alternative and the option of keeping
and/or modifying the existing pattern of Stop Sign within Indian River Estates. It was the majority decision of the
residents present to keep the existing Stop signs in place and add multi way stops at the intersections of Sunset
Blvd., and Scott Street, Sunset Blvd. and Bradley Street and at the intersections of Easy Street with Buchanan
Drive, Myrtle Drive, and Tangelo Drive.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
BCC Approval of Stop Signs on Bartow, Dec. 2, 2003 Agenda Item #7
Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution Numbers 04-59 and 04-60 establishing multi way stops at
the intersections of Sunset Blvd., and Scott Street, Sunset Blvd. and Bradley Street and at the intersections of
Easy Street with Buchanan Drive, Myrtle Drive, and Tangelo Drive.
r
COMMISSION ACTION:
1CJ APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER Approved 5-0
Dou sAnderson
County Administrator
[x] County Attomey
[ ] County Engineer
[ ] Purchasing Dept
y
Coordination/Signatures
[ ] Mgt & Budget
[ ] Project. ~r.
[ ] Other
I'IP",I.W"""'.~
[ ] Com Dev Director
MultiwayStpsEasy&PalmDr
'--
'...I
ITEM NO. C - 4C
DATE: February 17,2004
AGENDA REQUEST
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [X]
~'
TO: BOARD OF, COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115
PRESENTED BY:
Michael Powley, P.E.
County Engineer
SUBJECT: Request for a Public Hearing on St. Lucie Citrus Mining Permit Application.
BACKGROUND: The proposed St Lucie Citrus Mine is located in south central St. Lucie County south of
Okeechobee Road along east side of Ideal Holding Road. There has not been any previous mining activity on
this site.
FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A.
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval for a public hearing to be held on March 16,2004 or
soon thereafter to consider the request of the St. Lucie Citrus Mining Permit Application.
[ ] APPROVED
" OTHER:
[ ] DENIED
NCE:
COMMISSION ACTION:
--"
Pulled prior to
meeting.
Douglas Anderson
County Administrator
1'¡Co""~ Attom,y X ~
[x]Originating Dept. pu~orks "
[x]Eng/MSBU COOL
Coordination/Sianatures
[,¡Com. De'.~ '(V\
[]BudgetlReve.n.ue'C ord,
[]Mgt. & Budget ~
[x]Env. Res. Di~~
'--
\wi
ITEM NO. C- 4D
DATE: February 17,2004
AGENDA REQUEST
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [x]
~'
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): ENGINEERING DIVISION (4115)
PRESENTED BY:
Mit~~/
Michael V. Powley, P. .
County Engineer
SUBJECT:
To commit to cost share with the Florida Department of Transportation in the completion of the Indian River Lagoon Trace
shared-use pathway and forward the attached letter. Attached is correspondence discussing the proposed arrangement.
BACKGROUND:
The Indian River Lagoon Trace .pathway project is located on South Hutchinson Island from approximately the south
county line to the Fort Pierce city limits along the east side of SR A-I-A. The project was broken up into three phases.
Phase I is located south of the Florida Power and L.ight power plant and approximately three and a half (3.5) miles in
length. Phase I is in the process of being completed. Phase II is located north of the FP&L power plant and is
approximately seven miles in length. Phase III is located inside the FP&L power plant property and is approximately one
mile in length.
The design for Phase I was completed by GIatting Jackson. Phase I was broken up into three sub-sections because of the
availability of funding. The construction of the first two sub-sections has been completed with the third sub-section
anticipated to start construction later this year. The FDOT has agreed to assist with some funding for the third sub-section
of Phase I. The design for Phase II was begun by GIatting Jackson early in the year 2000, with subsequently little progress
due to the mitigation requirements for the environmental impacts. At this time there is no consultant on contract for design
of construction plans for Phase III.
The FDOT is currently designing a resurfacing project ofSR A-I-A from the FP&L power plant north to the Fort Pierce
city limits. At staffs request the FDOT has included a pathway across the FP&L property, which includes crossings at
both FP&L's intake and discharge canal at no cost to the County. These limits correspond to the County's Phase III. Staff
made a request ofFDOT to incorporate the County's Phase II, from the north side of the FP&L power plant to the Fort
Pierce City Limits, pathway with their resurfacing project. The FDOT agreed to incorporate the pathway into their plans
and construct it, if the C6unty would agree to pay $1,750,000 for wetland impact mitigation and $691,323.82 for incidental
work that would be necessary to accommodate the pathway.
The mitigation cost would have to be paid even if the County constructed the pathway without FDOT help. Ifthe County
were to construct the pathway the total cost would be approximately $3 to $4 million not including mitigation. If the
FDOT constructs the pathway with their resurfacing project, they will be responsible for all permitting and inspection.
After the FDOT project is completed, the County must still return and construct the recreational enhancements at the
County parks.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: :>b3COC>
Funds in the amount of$2.5 million dollars will be made available the fiscal year 2005 in Fund No.1 01 006-4116-5-63ßð'5-4904
Transportation TrustlImpact Fees: Funds to come from road impact fees and/or alternative funding
sources.
\..f
""-II
PREVIOUS ACTION:
September 1998 - Board granted conceptual approval to plans for development of pathway.
April 20, 1999 - Board approved work authorization with consultant, Glatting Jackson, for design and permitting in the
amount of$149,000.
October 12, 1999 - Board approved Change Order No. 1 to contract for environmental requirements.
December 2, 1999 - Board approved Change Order No.2 for additional services to obtain permits.
July 18, 2000 - Board granted permission to advertise fo~ -bids.
August 2000 - Bids were opened for Phase I and all exceeded the budgeted amount. They were subsequently rejected.
February 6, 2001 - Board approved Work Authorization No.5 to the contract C98-01-216 with GIatting Jackson in the
amount not to exceed $5,000 for design services for the Indian River Lagoon Trace.
May 8, 2001 - Board approved the awarding of the contract for construction of Phase IA and Phase IB to Dickerson of
Florida, Inc. in the amount of$990,038.
June 4, 2003 - Board approved Work Authorization No.5 to the contract COI-05-497 with Glatting Jackson in the amount
not to exceed $9,700 for design services for the Indian River Lagoon Trace.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Board approval to commit to cost share in the amount of $2. 5 million dollars with the Florida Department of
Transportation in the completion of the Indian River Lagoon Trace shared-use pathway and authorize the chairman to sign the
attached letter to commit to the éost sharing.
[x] County Attorney
[x] Originating DeP
[x] Finance
(Check for copy 0 y,.
[] DENIED
Approved 5-0 Dougl sAnderson
County Administrator
¡'j Mg<. & Bod", ¡,e¡) rrrn ~ ¡,j Po~hßi"g ~
[x] Project. Man. ~ ~, \, . [x] Department Rev, Coor. t\
[x] Env,Res.Div. ~~ ~N\15, [x]Com. Dev, . ~__
COMMISSION ACTION:
[}(APPROVED
[']OTHER
r
"-
....,¡
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO.~
DATE: Feb. 17,2004
~~
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [x]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY: DON MCLAM
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CENTRAL SERVICES
SUBJECT: BID #04-022/ DOLLMAN PARK RIVERSIDE (WEST)
BACKGROUND: On February 4, 2004, Bid #02-044 was opened for Dollman Park Riverside (West).
Seven hundred and ten (710) vendors were notified, forty-three (43) bid documents was
distributed and two (2) responses were received. Staff recommends award to Sunshine Land
Design for a total amount of $49,773.20.
FUNDS AVAIL: 310002-7240-563000-76020 (Improvements OIT Buildings)
PREVIOUS ACTION: BOCC approval to advertise Invitation For Bid, January 6,2004, Item No. c-
8b.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid #04-022 Dollman Park Riverside (West) to
Sunshine Land Design for a total amount of $49,773.20 and authorization for the Chairman to sign
the contract as prepared by the County Attorney.
MISSION ACTION:
rM. APPROVED [] DENIED
r î OTHER: Approved 5-0
ou Änderson
County Administrator
.;ÇurchaSing Mgr.: þ¡( P
Other:
Coordination/Signatures
County Attorney: ~
Originating D~\.'vt \v
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable)
Eft. 1/97
H:\AGENDA\AGENDA-DOLLMAN (WEST).DOC
"-
....,¡
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. 6A
DATE: February 1 7, 2004
REGULAR []
PUBLIC HEARING []
CONSENT [X]
SUBMITTED BY (DEPTh Administration
TO: Board of County Commissioners
SUB1ECT: , Housing Finance Authority Appointment
BACKGROUND: Commissioner B~rnes has requested that Mr. Thomas D. Siplin serve as his appointee
on the Housing Finance Authority.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/ A
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/ A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board ratify Commissioner Barnes appointment of Mr.
Thomas D. Siplin to the Housing Finance Authority.
. APPROVED
If OTH ER:
[] DENIED
COMMISSION ACTION:
r
Approved 5-0
Dougl s M. Anderson
County Administrator
Review and Approvals
County Attorney: _ Management & Budget:
Originating Dept: _ Other:
Finance: _ (Check for Copy only, if applicable)
Purchasing: _
Other:
Effective: 5/96
"-'
...J
ITEM NO. C-6B
DATE: February 17, 2004
AGENDA REQUEST
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ADMINISTRATION
REGULAR: ( )
PUBLIC HEARING: ( )
CONSENT: (X)
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT:
Dr. Edwin Massey, President of Indian River Community College requests the Board of County
Commissioners send a letter of thanks to Governor Bush for his favorable budget proposal, and to the
Legislative Delegation ask.ing their support of the Governor's budget proposal.
BACKGROUND:
See attached information packet from Dr. Edwin Massey
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Board to send letters to the Governor
and the Legislative Delegation on behalf of Indian River Community College's request and authorize
Chairman to sign.
cJt\PPROVED
o OTHER:
r 0 DENIED
Approved 5-0
COMMISSION ACTION:
Review and Approvals
o County Attorney:
o Management and Budget:
o Purchasing:
o Originating Dept:
.Q Other:
.Q Other:
o Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable:
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 772-462-1777
or TTD 772-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting.
'-'"
...,.¡
..
f>~~·:,;,'·"'.;.~>[~~:· ~~ ~ :::':' '.'
--..,..... .,' .....
,-
FEBRUARY 17, 2004
7 :00 PM
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
MEETING AGENDA
WELCOME
ALL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED.
PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES AND PAGERS
PRIOR TO ENTERING THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS.
GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES - Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at
today's Board meeting:
CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate
discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests.
REGULAR AGENDA - Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items, which the
Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda.
PUBLIC HEARINGS - These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesday at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as
possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M.,
then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to
indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone
wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes.
As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of
presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the
Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the board.
ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION - Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have
backup material, plefs'e have eight copies for distribution.
NON-AGENDA ITEMS '- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of
the printed agenda.
PUBLIC COMMENT - Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting of general public comment. Please limit comments to
five minutes.
DECORUM - Please be respectful of others opinions.
MEETINGS _ All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00
P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County
Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board
schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of
these workshops. Assistive Listening Device is available to anyone with a hearing disability. Anyone with a disability requiring
accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at (772) 462-1777
or TOO (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting.
~
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us
r
Paula A. Lewis, Chairman
John D. Bruhn, Vice Chairman
Doug Coward
Frannie Hutchinson
Cliff Barnes
District No. 3
District No. 1
District No. 2
District No. 4
District No. 5
February 17, 2004
7:00 P.M.
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
~~O
2.
3.
4.
SA.
6' ))~
~('
5B.
MINUTES
~
Approve the minutes 'of the meeting held on February 10, 2004
AMA TIONS/PRESENT A TIONS
Presentation by Jon Ward, Executive Director Cultural Affairs "Partnership," an Arts in Public
) ^ . Places Proje'fit _. . \ ^^\ I
UJ'mvn'lSS'ì v')AQr. :ru)1~S CO~J'.te.. (V\ ,\ò VY\t'új. ílt 7: 1,1 þt\
B. Reading of the announcements by the County AÉtministrator
GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT
CONSENT AG~N~jC- ~
)\ M p no...- "- J -{
~
PUBLIC HEARINGS
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMEMT f;rPI I I ~ ß
Continue Draft Resolution 03-241 approving the request of Reitano Enterprises, Inc. for a change in
zoning from the Ag-l (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning district to the CG (Commercial General) zoning
district for property located on the east side of Koblegard Road, approximately 330 feet north of the
intersection of Indrio Road and Koblegard Road to March 18, 2004. - Consider staff recommendation to
continue the public hearing on Draft Resolution 03-241, for 30 days (March 18, 2004) to allow for the
drafting of the North County Charrette report.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
/0 Consider Draft Resolution 04-009 approving the request of Palms & Tropical Trees Depot, Inc. for a
(f) ./ change in zoning from the AG-l (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning district to the IL (Industrial Light)
rJJ.~zoning district for property located on the west side of Kings Highway, approximately 2,500 feet south of
~\ Angle Road, directly south of the existing Kraft Garden Nursery. - Consider staff recommendation to
-P' approve Draft Resolution 04-009.
'--
....,
r
Regular Agenda
February 17, 2004
Page Two
5C.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
~J
Consider Draft Resolution 04-012 approving the request of Carlos Munoz Quintana, for a Major
Adjustment to an existing Minor Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a 9,040
square foot second story addition to the PSL Moving & Storage Depot mini-warehouse and self-storage
facility - Consider staff recommendation to ,approve Draft Resolution 04-12.
5D. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Bí~ yó /)) ~ Consider Draft Resolution 04-006 granting approval to the petition of Reserve Homes, Ltd., for a Change
H- IJ eS .!) ~ M'&-\n Zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit
-, 'l\~( U' Development) Zoning District and Final Planned Unit Development approval for the project known as
c..a ~e) fW' Parcel 21 @ The Reserve (Briarcliff) a 33-lot single-family residential subdivision. - Consider staff
~r ~e.S recommendation to approve Draft~ Resolution 04-006.
\....e(,U~~'1G" 5E. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
6J'JJ
~~
Consider Draft Resolution 04-013, approving the request of Robert Stiegele, Centerline Homes, for a
change in zoning from the RS-2 zoning district to the PUD zoning district and Preliminary and Final PUD
approval for an 84-unit townhouse project to be known as Shadow Oaks @ 10-Mile Creek, subject to the
limiting conditions contained therein.
-4,
SF. PUBLIC WORKS
/ t'\ \... Consider Draft Resolution 04-015 granting a Variance from Dennis Corrick, for a Variance from Section
l'f')AJf,'(} 6.02.02(B) (2) (a) (2) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - St. Lucie River Shoreline
~\ Setbacks, for property located at 6414 Riverland Drive. - Consider staff recommendation to approve
\r\ Draft Resolution 04-015.
5G. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
/ \) Consider the continuation of the application of Glassman Holdings, LLC for a Change to the Future land
fv,./ ~ Use Map of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan until March 16, 2004. - Consider staff
'J ~~ recommendation to continue the application of Glassman Holdings, LLC, for a change in Future land Use
W classification from RE (Residential, Estate) to RU (Residential, Urban) until March 16, 2004.
5H. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT L _L I'J~ t\.~I' 1 1\1.'; I
N \ I S r V\f\(¡v(..... ~,." pe.n'l"lVII '\U11~ TO U»Jtc:1.
P ð.- \~ Consider Draft Resolution 04-011 granting a Change in Zoning from the RMH-5 (Residential, Mobile-
H- ¡J 0 - ~IÖ Home - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District for property located at the
~ ~e) - N northwest corner of the intersection of St. Lucie Boulevard and Hammond Road. - Consider staff
'- ' 'Ò recommendation to approve Draft Resolution 04-011.. I' \ (...
() ~ G; -- tv f,l\o~ì I!y\ ~ o\j ecr ('t(j e.v~ ~~ 0> -~)
~ (fA _ ~I~e,) CO UNITY DEVELOPMENT MohCM rD ~PW{PO\ 3.....d.l~ V\ Œo\«P< -/1[0
\IV V\ ~M- &.,t\t~ -Nò
Consider Draft Resolution 04-016 granting a Major Adjustment to an Existing Conditional Use Permit to
allow for the expansion of an existing freestanding drinking place and retail liquor (distilled and un-distilled)
r ~ store in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning for the Lakewood Park Liquor Store on property located at
)~4902 North Kings Highway (lndrio Crossing Shopping Center).
~~(ôi
\jJ'~ JG.
\wt
""""
Regular Agenda
February 1 7, 2004
Page Three
5J.
5K.
7
~AW
jl Q/I
~
N'o (lJ,'M ~ fettY''' f..\ 11'1.- ~~s ~ì", <-
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Consider Draft Ordinance 04-003, amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by creating
section 3.01.03(EE) Cpub, Conservation - Public, Zoning District and by amending Section 7.04.01,
Table 1-10 to provide for minimum lot standards for this new zoning district. - No action is required from
the Commission at this time. This is the first of two required public hearings on this matter. The second
public hearing on this matter will be held on Tuesday, March 2, 2004, at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as
possible.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
Consider general amendments to the County's zoning maps consistent with recent changes to the County
Future Land Use Maps. - The Public Hearing set for February 17, 2004, was intended to be the first of
two scheduled public hearings on this matter. However, we have been advised that some members of the
community felt the published nôtÎCe for these changes, while complaint with the County's notification
procedures, was not adequate or legible enough in its published form for all interested persons to
understand. Accordingly, at this time I would request that the Board withhold any action on this matter
and we will re-notice the hearings on this topic with a more pronounced newspaper ad and if the Board
feels it appropriate, mailed notices to all property owners within or adjacent to the effected areas.
'.' END OF PUBLIC HEARINGS
-----
6.
DMINISTRA TION
Purchase of Harbor Branch Shrimp Property - Consider staff recommendation that we allocate $10,400
from Contingency to perform appraisals and due diligence as the first step in acquiring this property. Staff
is recommending that we allocate an amount from Contingency not to exceed $10,400 to perform the
appraisals and title work on this property.
~i\I' ~~ woÞ. J~L6SìlJl1 t:\~ S~
r
ß ~ tM holA .¡::;¡, ~ J. :)l-""~ 'o;¡"" +ö be. r e O(j e;Jqe).
~
'wi
CONSENT AGENDA
February 1 7, 2004
1. WARRANTS LISTS
Approve warr~nts list No. 22
2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
A. Request to approve Budget Amendment No. 04-134 for $5,000 and Equipment Request No. EQ
04-238 for the purchase of traffic counters. - Consider staff recommendation to approve Budget
Amendment No. 04-134.
B. Approval of the Commissioner's Award for Art for Nature Spring Plein Air 2004. - Consider
staff recommendation to approve a $250 Commissioners Award for the Best ESL painting created
during the 2004 Art for Nature Spring Plein Air event. The award shall be given to the artist
whose painting best portrays one of the County's ESL sites.
C. Request approval of the Third Amendment to the Consultant Agreement between Janus Research
Inc. and St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners. - Consider staff recommendation to
approve the Third Amendment to the Consultant Agreement between Janus Research Inc. and St.
Lucie County to include the Consultants attendance at an additional public meeting regarding the
Historical Preservation Ordinance.
D. Resolution No. 04-32 to accept FDOT federal funds approved on February 6, 2004 in the
amount of $50,000. These funds will be used to pay 59% of the North County Charrette Design
Study, being held '2/7/04 through 2/1 3/04, by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. -
Consider staff recommendation to approve Resolution No. 04-32, for $50,000.
3. COUNTY ATTORNEY
Resolution 04-57 - Permanent Slope Easement - Lennard Road MSBU - Frank and Sandra Lagana -
Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chairman to execute Resolution 04-57 accepting the
Permanent Slope Easement and instruct staff to record Resolution 04-57 In the Public Records of St. Lucie
County, Florida.
4. PUBLIC WORKS
A. Work Authorization No. 4 with BCI Engineers and Scientist, Inc. for Design of Upland Material
Management Area (Spoil site) for Taylor Creek Dredging. - Consider staff recommendation to
approve Work Authorization No. 4 with BCI Engineers and Scientist, Inc. in the amount of
$7,494.00 and authorize the Chairman to sign.
r
B. Road and Bridge Division - Establishing Multi Way Stops on Easy Street and on Palm Drive in
Indian River Estates. - Consider staff recommendation to adopt Resolution Nos. 04-59 and 04-60
establishing multi way stops at the intersections of Sunset Blvd., and Scott Street, Sunset Blvd. and
Bradley Street and at the intersections of Easy Street with Buchanan Drive, Myrtle Drive, and
Tangelo Drive.
\\ \ \ \. ~. Engineering Division - Request for a Public Hearing on St. Lucie Citrus Mining Permit Application.
Y Ll \ \èq. - Consider staff recommendation to approve a public hearing to be held on March 16, 2004 or
() '-- ~ ~ . soon thereafter to consider the request of the St. Lucie Citrus Mining Permit Application.
\' (I Ö ~v t)
D. Engineering Division - To commit to cost share with the Florida Department of Transportation in
the completion of he Indian River Lagoon Trace shared-use pathway and forward the attached
letter. Consider staff recommendation to approve to commit to cost share in the amount of $2.5
million dollars with the Florida Department of Transportation in the completion of the Indian River
Lagoon Trace shared-use pathway and authorize the Chairman to sign the letter to commit to the
cost sharing.
'-"
..."
Consent Agenda
February 17, 2004
Page Two
5. CENTRAL SERYICES
Bid #04-022/Dollman Park Riverside (West) - Consider staff recommendation to award Bid #04-022
Dollman Park Riverside (West) to Sunshine Land Design for a total amount of $49,773.20 and
authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney.
6. ADMINISTRATION
A. Housing Finance Authority Appointment - Consider staff recommendation to ratify Commissioner
Barnes appointment of Mr. Thomas D. Siplin to the Housing Finance Authority.
B. Dr. Edwin Massey, President of Indian River Community College requests the Board of County
Commissioners send a letter of thanks to Governor Bush for his favorable budget proposal, and to
the Legislative Delegation asking their support of the Governor's budget proposal. - Consider staff
recommendation to autH'õrize the Board to send letters to the Governor and the Legislative
Delegation o'n behalf of Indian River Community College's request and authorize the Chairman to
sign.
, ..'
r
\.1 ~
ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ANNOUNCEMENTS
FEBRUARY 17, 2004
A. The Board of County Commissioners wilrhold a Strategic Planning Session on February 19, 2004
at The Panther Woods Country Club, 9425 Meadowood Drive, Fort Pierce, Florida, from 8:00
AM to 5:00 PM '
B. The 37th Annual St. Lucie County Fair wiII begin on Friday, Feb. 27th and run through Sunday,
Mar. 7th at the St. Lucie County Fairgrounds.
C. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Joint meeting with the City of Fort Pierce
Commission, and the City or Port St. Lucie Council on Thursday, March 4, 2004 at the
Schreiber Conference Center, Core Communities Auditorium, St. Lucie West I RCC/F AU
Campus, St. Lucie West 500 N.W. California Blvd. Port St. Lucie! Florida, from 2:00 PM to
4:00 PM.
D. The opening day for spring training home games for the New York Mets at the newly renovated
Mets Stadium will be on 'Friday, March 5 at 7: 1 0 p.m. versus the St. Louis Cardinals.
r
NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at
these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is
made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, Individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings
will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring
accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (772) 462- t 777 or TDD (772)
462- t 428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting.
..
~'
,.."
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Date: February 1 0, 2004
Tape: 1-2
REGULAR MEETING
Convened: 9:00 a.m.
Recessed: 10:00 a.m.
Re-convened:6:30 p.m.
Adjourned: 6:55 p.m.
Commissioners Present: Chairperson, Paula A. Lewis, Frannie Hutchinson, Doug
Coward, John D. Bruhn, Cliff Barnes
Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Ray Wazny, Asst. County
Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Dennis Murphy, Community
Development Director, Paul Phillips, Airport Director, Don West, Public Works Director,
Jack Southard, Public Safety Director, Roger Shinn, Central Services Director, Beth
Ryder, Community Services Director, Pete Keogh, Parks and Recreation Director, Marie
Gouin, M & B Director, Millie Delgado-Feliciano, Deputy Clerk
1. MINUTES (1-024)
It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the minutes ofthe
meeting held February 3, 2004; and upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
2. PROCLAMA TIONS/PRESENT A TIONS
A. Resolution No. 04-43- Proclaiming February 16, 2004 through
February 22,2004 as "ST. LUCIE COUNTY SURVEYORS WEEK"
in St. Lucie County, Florida.
It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No.
04-43; and, upon roll call. Motion carried unanimously.
Mr. Ted Phillips, Indian River Chapter of Surveyors and Mappers was present to accept
the proclamation.
B. Resolution No. 04-34- Proclaiming February 20, 2004 through
February 28,2004 as "Jazz WeeklMain Squeeze Citrus Festival" in Ft.
Pierce, Florida.
It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 04-
34; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
Resolution No, 04-58- Proclaiming February 12,2004 as "Step Up
rlorida Day" in St. Lucie County, Florida.
It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 04-
58; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
Ms. Diane Walgren, Health Department was present to accept the proclamation.
C. Employee of the 1 sl Quarter-
The County Administrator announced the Employee õfthe 1 sl Quarter, Ms. Judy Stunda
employed at the Library.
D. The County Administrator announced upcoming events and meetings.
1
----
'-'"
"""'"
3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS ( 1-340)
Mr. Tom Rob, Hutchinson Island resident, addressed the Board in protest of the land
swap ofHennan's Bay. He advised the Board he had 250 signatures in opposition (these
signatures were not submitted for the record).
Mr. Don McLam, Asst. Central Services Director, advised the Board of the positives and
the negatives of the land swap.
Mr. Charles Grande, Hutchinson Island resident, addressed the Board regarding the lack
of public communication in the planning process.
Mr. Bob Bangert, Holiday Pines resident, thanked the Board for providing the North
County residents with the Charrette.
4. CONSENT AGENDA (1-1483)
It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the Consent
Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
1. WARRANT LIST
The Board approved Warrant List No. 21.
2. COUNTY ATTORNEY
A. Amendments to Agreements with George Dugan, III and Kirschner &
Garland to provide legal representation to indigents in criminal cases-
The Board approved the amendments to the George Dugan; Esq., and
Kirschner & Garland, P.A. as outlined.
B. Ordinance No. 04-016- Pennission to Advertise- The Board approved
advertising proposed Ordinance No. 94-016 for public hearings before
the Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency on
March 18, 2004 and the Board of County Commissioners on April 6,
2004 and April 20, 2004 beginning at 7:00 p.m. or as son thereafter as
possible.
C. Acceptance of Florida DEP Land & Water Conservation Fund Grant in
furtherance of the River Park Marina- The Board approved accepting
the grant award and authorized the Chainnan to sign the Grant
Agreement.
D. Release of Bond- Sterling Silver Scape & Sod, Inc., C02-05-549-
Tlw Board approved the release of the Puhlic Construction Bond.
E. Ordinance No. 04-014- Establishing Regulations to Govern the Use of
Properties and Facilities Owned or Leased by the County: Permission
to Advertise- The Board granted permission to advertise Ordinance
No. 04-014 for March 2, 2004 which is a night meeting.
3. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
A. The United States Department of Agriculture Natural Resources
Conservation Service awarded funds of$56,614. An estimated
amount of$55,000 for 2003-2004 was initially budgeted; an additional
$1,614 is required to equal the awaIdedgrant amount- The Board
approved Budget Resolution No. 04-46 in the amount of$1,614.
B. Approval of Equipment 04-236 and Budget Amendment BA 04-128
for Handheld Computer- The Board approved Budget Amendment
04-128 and Equipment Request 04-236.
2
02/06/04
P7.ABWARR
FUND
001
001117
001131
001142
001146
001149
001157
001158
001284
001285
001286
001288
001809
101
101002
101003
101006
101215,
102-
102001
102107
.)
I
107001
107002
107003
107134
113
114
116
117
119
123
127
128
136
13'8
140
140001
160
170
183
183001
183004
184203
184205
1°4805
j003
\...t
,....,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
WARRANT LIST #21~ 31-JAN-2004 TO 06-FEB-2004
FUND, SUMMARY
TITLE
EXPENSES
General Fund
FTA 49 USC Sec.5307..,.98/99_
FTA Section 5303'Grant FY01
FTA Section 5303 Grant FY01/02
FTA USC Section 5307 FY03
Section 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning 2004
CSBG Grant FY04
Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab 03/04
TRIP Grant FY04
S.L.C. Mental Health Collaborative
FDCA/EMPA 2004
TDC Planning Grant FY 03/04
SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04
Transportation Trust Fund
Transportation Trust/80% Constitut
Transportation Trust/Local Option
Transportation Trust/Impact Fees ..
FDOT Traffic Signal System Grant
Unincorporated Services Fund
Drainage Maintenance MSTU
FDOT Bicycle/Ped. Coordinator O~/04
,Library Special 'Grants Fund
Fine & Forfeiture Fund
Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur
Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar.
Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper
USDOJ Local Law Enf Block Gr FY04
Harmony Heights 3 Fund
Harmony Heights 4 Fund
Sunland Gardens Fund
Sunrise Park Fund
Holiday pines Fund
Queens Cove Lighting Qiat#13 Fund
Pine Hollow Street Lighting MSTU
Kings Hwy'Industria1 Park Lighting
Monte Carlo Lighting MSTU#4 Fund
Palm Lake Gardens MSTU Fund
Port & Airport Fund
port Fund
Plan Maintenance RAD Fund
Court Facilities Fund
Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir
Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat
Ct Admin.- Teen Court
Ft. pierce Beach Restoration
FDEP Fort pierce Shore Protection P
FIND Shoreline Stabilization for N
FHFA SHIP FY02/03
267,854.78
12,487.00
47.95
20.55
55,354.00
1,219.60
868.52
279.69
73,992.10
15,800.00
134.90
78.18
337.46
89,072.29
102,271. 50
1,093.30
23,577.50
1,145.00
13,190.24
2,564.53
302.88
488.52
284,001.56
195.01
12,468.09
52.49
44,263.24
210.52 .
461. 87
513.76
128.12
762.17
264.04
337.64
444.13
1,340.93
109.77
8,469.02
6,408.18
1,865.88
395.60
2,076.39
482.04
899.57
1,949.71
13,524.16
1,322.24
55.69
. PAGE
1
PAYROLL
0..00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
, 0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
02/06/04
1='17:1U3WARR
FUND
185004
185204
310003
315
316
316104
316201
362
390
396
401
418
421
441
448
449
451
458.
461
471
478·
( . ")
"-- ;)
491
505.
505001
611
615
625
655
'--'
...."
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
WARRANT LIST #21- 31-JAN-2004 TO 06-FEB-2004
FUND SUMMARY
TITLE
FHFA SHIP FY03/04
FHFASHIP;:',:9 9 / 0 0
Impact Fees-Public Buildings
County Building Fund
County Capital
Pepper Park Dune Crossover
FDEP/FRDAP Savanna Rec Phase II
Sports Complex Improv Fund
Treasure Cove/Ocean Harbor S Cap
Lennard Road 1 - Roadway Capital
Sanitary Landfill Fund
Golf Course Fund
H.E.W. Utilities Fund
North Hutchinson Island Utilities
NHI Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund
NHI Util - Capital Facilities Fund
S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund
SH Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund
Sports Complex Fund
No County Utility Oistrict-Operatin
No Cty' Util Dist-Renewal &' Replace
No Cty Util Dist-Capital Facilities
Airport Util - Capital Fac Fund'
Building Code Fund .
Health Insurance Fund
Property/Casualty Insurance Fund
Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund
Impact Fees Fund
Law Library
Insurance Agency Fund
GRAND TOTAL:
EXPENSES
448.16
55.68
4,157.50
117,848.74
257,714.29
4,031.98
3,646.17
1,358,439.25
22,793.40
933.23
31,859.23
18,679.32
35.06
2,459.01
69.88
84.34
54,614.22
86.20
4,909.14
1,613.62
·54.40
106.20
24.99
11,995.96
4,847.74
455,601.29
2,846.00
153,867.62 .
99.55
66,368.98
3,625,473.46
PAGE 2
PAYROLL
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
. 6,963.32
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
6,963.32
-
'--'
....,
c.
Adopt Budget Resolution 04-?? To establish the budget for Sunland
Gardens MSBU Phase 1 Project- The Board adopted Resolution No.
04- ??
4. PUBLIC SAFETY
Request to approve the purchase of a Router for Security/Firewall for the 911 Center-
The Board approved the purchase of the Router, Equipment Request #04-237, Budget
Amendment # 04-131.
5. PUBLIC WORKS
A. Environmental Resources Division- The Board approved Budget
Resolution No. 04-45 Insurance Reimbursement- The Board approved
Budget Resolution 04-45 establishing the budget for reimbursement.
B. Environmental Resources Division- Purchase of Trailside Composting
toilets for Bluefield Ranch Preserve- The Board approved the
purchase of two trailside composting toilets at $2,168 each for a total
of$4,335.
<
C. Engineering Division- Professional Engineering Services for
Roadway and Intersection Design-Work Authorization No.1 (C03-
09-644) Horn and Associates in the amount of$23,600 for Phase 1
construction improvements for the Ten Mile Creek-Gordy Road
Recreation Area- The Board approved Work Authorization No.1 in
the amount of$23,600 for phase 1 construction improvements for the
Ten Mile Creek-Gordy Road Recreation Area.
D. Engineering Division- Award Bid No. 03-103 Edwards/Selvitz Road
Intersection Improvements Project- The Board approved awarding Bid
No. 03-103 to Ranger Construction Industries, Inc., to the lowest
bidder in the amount of $522,443.20 establish the project budget as
outlined in the attached memorandum and authorized the Chairman to
sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney.
E. Solid Waste Division- Permission to advertise for bids for Residential
Solid Waste Collection and Recycling and to request bids for both
billing and collection methods.- The Board approved advertising for
bids for Residential Solid Waste Collection and to request bids for
both billing and collection methods (i.e. liens) and provide an
alternative bid for the levy and collection of non-ad valorem
assessment (tax roll) .
F. Solid Wastc Division- CDM Proposal to provide engineering
serviccs- The Board approved the CDM proposal to provide
cnginccring services for assistance with implementation orthe Glades
Road Landfill Northeast Comer Assessment Plan for a lump sum
amount of $44,850.
6. GRANTS
Request approval to submit u grant application to the Florida Division of Emergency
Management- The Board approved submitting a grant application not to exceed $35,000
to the Florida Division of Emergency Management/US Department of Homeland
Security for the development of a Community Emergency Response Team (CERT).
7. PURCHASING
3
~
...,
A.
Donation of Surplus Equipment to Bethel Baptist Church- The Board
approved the donation of the surplus equipment to Bethel Baptist
Church.
B.
Bid Waiver and Sole Source declaration for purchase of wood waste
material from the C & D Processing Facility to New Hope Power
Partnership- The Board approved the bid waiver and sole source
declaration.
C.
Permission to advertise Invitation for Bid for the purchase and
installation of water heaters at the Rock Road Jail- The Board
approved the request for permission to advertise for bid.
8. PARKS AND RECREATlON-
Purchase of Laser Grademaster Grading System- (Equipment Request # EQ04-086- The
Board approved amending equipment number EQ04-086 and purchase the complete laser
grading system at a cost of$16,015.00.
9. ADMINISTRATION
ECivis Grant Locater- The Board authorized the Chairman ofthe Board of County
Commissioners to sign a renewal subscription agreement for eCivis Grant Locater.
10. AIRPORT
A. Stormwater drainage improvement design- The Board approved Work
Authorization #2 for $41,785 scope of work with Kimley-Horn &
Associates for the design phase services bid and award senrices and
construction phase services associated with stormwater drainage
improvements at the St. Lucie County Interntional Airport.
B. Security Fencing Design- The Board approved Work Authorization #
1 and the $38,807 scope of work with Kimley -Home & Associates
for the design phase services bid and award services and construction
phase services associated with the Phase 4 security fencing at St. Lucie
County International Airport.
11. CENTRAL SERVICES
Equipment Request # EQ04-235/Budget Amendment #BA04-130- Purchase of Color
Printer for Central Services Administration- The Board approved the purchase of a HP
Color Laser Jet 4600dn Printer, at a cost of $2,105.00.
12. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
A. Final Plat Approvals Porto fino Shores PUD Phase II- The Board
approved the final plats for Portofino Shores, Phase II subject to
execution of all fi'nal subdivision agreements and posting of any
required securities.
B. Final Plat Approvals for Porto fino Shores PUD Phase III- The Board
approved the final plats for Porto fino Shores, Phase III subject to
execution of all final subdivision agreements and posting of any
required securities.
REGULAR AGENDA
5. NO PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED
4
~
,""""
6. PARKS AND RECREATION (1-1668)
Lincoln Park Community Center Extended Hours and approval of Budget Amendment
No. 04-133- Staff requested direction from the Board and approval of Budget Resolution
No. BA04-133 if the proposal is approved.
Staff advised the Board that they were looking to provide longer hours and more
programs for the youths in the area on Saturdays. They believe they will have a greater
turn out on this day as opposed to Friday's when then only have 15 participants. It was
also noted that the residents in the area requested the programs be changed to Saturday, in
order to keep the children from hanging in the areas which seem to be problematic with
gangs etc.
It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve the Budget
Amendment and change the programs to Saturday's as requested by staff on a temporary
basis; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously.
7. ADMINJSTRATrON
The Board members provided committee and advisory board updates.
8. COUNTY ATTORNEY (2-100)
Interlocal Agreement - Utility Bulk Sale- Consider staff recommendation to approve
Resolution No. 04-61 approving the draft Interlocal Agreement, Service Area Map and
Bulk Utility Service Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreêment.
The County Administrator addressed the Interlocal Agreement approved 5-0 by the Ft.
Pierce City Commission. He advised the Board ofthe changes and/or additions to the
agreement.
1. The County would recognize that the City ofFt. Pierce has an annexation plan
and that this would be recognized in both the City's Comprehensive Plan and
the County's Comprehensive Plan. It is not favoring the City's annexation
plan and not committing to their annexation plan only recognizing they have a
plan.
2. In the agreement submitted to the City Commission, we had language that the
water supplied to Indian River Estates would be determined by a ballot voted
on by the residents ofIndian River Estates. In tonight's meeting the city
decided this should be placed in the agreement.
3. In paragraph 17 of the agreement, the city has new language that the County
Attorney has agreed that would not affect the county's position.
4. The "Jog" on the map, the city voted to square the area from Taylor Dairy
Road to Johnston Road.
5. The Airport annexation amendment would provide that the city would agree
not to proceed with the annexation ofthe airport, the corridor going to the
airport and this will be resolved with continued discussions. In the interim, the
city will continue to provide bulk water services to the airport.
6. On the map, the section detailed as "notes'': will be incorporated in the bulk
utility agreement and taken off the map.
Those present from the city were Mayor Benton, Com. Nelson, Com. Alexander, Mr.
Budreaux and Mr. Koblegard from the FPUA and also Mr. Summerhayes from the
UA Authority.
5
\a-
..,-
Com. Coward pointed out the following. The map in the yellow area are where the
lines are in the ground and is the service area where the FPUA has annexation
agreements in hand would and would voluntarily take place. Outside the yellow, we
have worked with city and UA to provide bulk water without annexation, Lakewood
Park, Holiday Pines, all the North County will not be subject to annexation per this
agreement.
Com. Lewis stated the changes and additions are understandable enough, however,
she felt conflicted on the part of the agreement, item I, and felt as she did previously,
it seems the state has a fairly understandable State Statute as to how annexation can
and can not take place and she cannot get past this particular statement.
Com. Hutchinson stated she too would like to commend the city and FPUA for their
hard work, unfortunately, the last time she voted on something like this, she voted
against it and is giving the same reason for voting against this one. She does not
agree where the lines are going, she concurred with Com. Lewis, regarding the
creation of enclaves and the pockets. So she will be voting no.
It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No.
04-61 approving the draft Interlocal Agreement, Service Area Map and Bulk Utility
Service Agreement and authorized the Chainnan to sign the Agreements; and, upon
roll call, the vote was as follows: Aye's: Bruhn, Barnes, Coward; Nay's: Hutchinson,
Lewis; motion carried by a vote of 3 to 2.
Mr. Bud Budreaux, thanked the Board for approving the agreement and commended
those involved.
Mr. Bob Benton, Mayor of the City ofFt. Pierce stated for the record that as l'tmg he is
Mayor, they will not be pursuing annexation of the airport.
Com. Nelson, thanked the Board and stated he is pleased with everyone's efforts.
There being no further busincss to be brought before the Board, the mecting was
adjourned.
Chainnan
Clerk of Circuit Court
6
..~
.(
~
"""'.
-;,
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
./
6A
2/17/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ].
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
BACKGROUND:
Consider Draft Resolution 03-241 approving the re uest of Reitano Enterpri s, Inc. for a
change in zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning distric to the CG
(Commercial General) zoning district for property located on the east side 0 Koblegard
Road, approximately 330 feet north of the intersection of Indrio Road and Koblegard
Road to March 18, 2004. (File No.: CU-03-043).
At the December 2, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners continued the petition of
Reitano Enterprises, Inc. to rezone a 2.15-acre tract of land located on the east side of
Koblegard Road, approximately 330 feet north of the intersection of Indrio Road and
Koblegard Road, from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 dulacre) zoning district to the CG
(Commercial, General) zoning district until February 17, 2004. The reason for the
continuance was to include the parcel of land into the North County Charrette and
determine whether or not the proposed use is consistent with the outcome of the final
charrette plan.
SUBJECT:
The North County Charrette has been scheduled for the week of February 7 through the
13th, which will conclude with a public presentation of the outcome of the charrette input
on February 13, 2004. After this additional meetings will be held for the acceptance and
adoption of the final charrette master plan, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Land
Development Code amendments that may result from the charrette outcome.
Based upon the charrette hot concluding until February 13, 2004 staff recommends that
the applicant's petition be continued for a minimum of 30 days, March 16, 2004.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
At the December 2, 2003 public hearing, the Board of County Commissioners
continued the public hearing on this matter until February 17, 2004.
RECOMMENDATION:
At the November 20, 2003 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission. by
a vote of 8-0, with one member absent (Mr. Trias), recommended approval of the
applicant's request for a change in zoning.
Staff recommends continuing the public hearing on Draft Resolution 03-241, for 30
days (March 18, 2004) to allow for the drafting of the North County Charrette report.
Approved 5-0
CURRENCE:
COMMISSION ACTION:
~ APPROVED
c=J OTHER
D DENIED
~
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Coordination! Signatures
County Attorney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
,'1
"
Mgt. & Budget:
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works:
Other:
M\I{' / ~pN'
f(
\r\'t-·~\
...."
..
~
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
r':;n"
: ,Ü
Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes
The Following
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property
Located At:
Major Adjustment to existing Conditional Use Permit to allow for the
expansion of a liquor store.
4900 North Kings Highway (Indrio Crossings Shopping Center).
Currently Zoned:
CG (Commercial, General)
Piease Return To:
St. Lucie County, Department of Community Deveiopment
Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: February 10.2004.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
.r
I ,./
~.
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Address:
Þ/~/IJ {¡AI ~ ~Ú{=- 5,. ./fI/~
:~'~/f? 25~ (1£?e'Fk RJl'-,IJ}//l/Vl)Ø-j?)1 ,~;:)Y
Name
(Please Print):
, \-PV---
,/)íj/('é' Y / 'JC;Þ.J'-{ð~ ~
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Date:
J 1 7J'~/";)oP'j Signed:
I ;/ ,
Comments:
(FILE NO. CUMJ-04-001 - Ranjana Patel)
rT~FCRI'TED
! ...
I ~rn 1 7 2884
I '
IBY:"
'-'
..."
." ...
-,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY h.:L ¡
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes
The Following
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property
Located At:
Major Adjustment to existing Conditional Use Permit to allow for the
expansion of a liquor store.
4900 North Kings Highway (Indrio Crossings Shopping Center).
Currently Zoned:
CG (Commercial, General)
Please Return To:
St. Lucie County, Department of Community Deveiopment
Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: February 10.2004.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OFTHE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
x
I certify that, as of the date shown below, lam a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
(
Cecil '6
'730/ Sa "I frA
rí 1',' eroe
Date:
'0/ I t) J () ¥' Signed:
/
L 0... "r -r e_ r-
~~r-ß~ ~;-
p¿ 3 r.¡ 75-/
~1J~ .P
CáÀZ-~
Address:
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Q
W
>-
~
W
CJ
~
"'<t-
~ 1 C mments:
-X
\
Q:J
lU
LL
LU.,A. riD I A-11~ /U.J..l..J) _~ jO_~L.~ -;rfJ__(O I b)J
i _UJ~_J"'" ./O~ l.LI~ (~f'.A.~ .Ãb LJ~ ..L(
J~ J~{.~ ~' ;t Jv... '? Å .1,- ~d~.J' ~, a-u..-I,D _~
~ ~c-c;~qÁ} U.,{...J ~ q..c '~~A ~
~ ....aJ..~ ~~. 0- u.J~JL. '3~ ~~Lu~
(FILE NO. CUMJ-04-001 - Ranjana Patel) S,...L.e.~ ~ c:.~ ¡:;.-,.-...~ ~. ~CQ-<.~.I.- v6
~ IV~) ~ ~ ~o..~.,~~JlJ:Ú(
,
'-'
...,
,""""-
ð/3
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
2/17/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X ]
Quasi-J D [ X ]
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
Consider Draft Resolution 04-009 approving the request of Palms &
Tropical Trees Depot, Inc. for a change in zoning from he AG-1
(Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning district to the IL (Industrial Light) zoning
district for property located on the west side of Kings Highway,
approximately 2,500 feet south of Angle Road, directly south of the
existing Kraft Garden Nursery. (File No.: RZ-03-044).
(\
BACKGROUND:
Attached is a copy of the petition of Palms & Tropical Trees Depot, Inc.,
for a change in zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning
district to the IL (Industrial Light) zoning district, for a 20.41-acre tract of
land located on the west side of Kings Highway, approximately 2,500 feet
south of Angle Road, directly south of the existing Kraft Garden Nursery.
The applicant has indicated that the purpose of this change in zoning is
to allow for the construction of an industrial park.
The permitted uses in the IL (Industrial light) zoning district are not
expected to negatively impact the existing uses in the surrounding area or
place additional demands on public services in the area.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
At the January 15, 2004 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning
Commission, by a vote of 7-1, with one member absent (Mr. Akins),
recommended approval of the applicant's request for a change in
zoning.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-009.
COMMISSION ACTION:
[K] APPROVED
c=J OTHER
D DENIED
RRENCE:
Approved 5-0
D glas M. Anderson
ounty Administrator
Coordination! Signatures
County Attorney ,~
Finance.:
Environ. Resources; \ ~\\,,-i'\
\J ~
Mgt. & Budget:
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works:
Other:
~:'.h/ ~
Ifi \.- j ,
I (
'-'
'-tI
COMMISSION REVIEW: February 17, 2004
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
(Planning Division)
MEMORANDUM
TO: County Commission
FROM: Dennis Murphy, Community Development Director
DATE: February 10, 2004
SUBJECT: Petition of Palms and Tropical Trees Depot, Inc., for a change in zoning from the
AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du!acre) zoning district to the IL (Industrial Light) zoning
district. (File No.: RZ-03-044)
The petitioner, Palms and Tropical Trees Depot, Inc., has requested a change in zoning for a 20.41-
acre tract of land located on the west side of Kings Highway, approximately 2,500 feet south of
Angle Road, directly south of the existing Kraft Garden Nursery, from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1
du!acre) zoning district to the IL (Industrial Light) zoning district. The petitioner has indicated a desire
to develop the property into an industrial park consistent with the existing development pattern along
this segment of Kings Highway.
The area in which the subject property is located is designated IND (Industrial) on the future land
use map of the County's Comprehensive Plan. Table 1-3 of the Future Land Use Element of the
Comprehensive Plan, Land Use Designation!Zoning Comparison Matrix indicates the following
zoning designations as being compatible with the Industrial future land use designation: CG
(Commercial General), IL (Industrial, Light), IH (Industrial, Heavy), IX (Industrial Extraction), U
(Utilities), I (Institutional), PNRD (Planned Nonresidential Development), PMUD (Planned Mixed Use
Development) and RVP (Recreational Vehicle Park). The proposed IL (Industrial Light) zoning
district is a zoning district allowed in the IND (Industrial) land use designation.
The area in which the subject property is located has been changing from an agricultural area
(primarily citrus groves and pasture land) to an industrial area. The property immediately to the
south is currently being developed into an industrial park. The property immediately to the north is
the Kraft Garden Nursery. Further north at the corner of Kings Highway and Angle Road is the
Kings Highway Industrial Park and the Minton and Son packinghouse. The IL (Industrial Light)
zoning district is compatible with the other nonresidential and industrial uses in the area. The
applicant's request is consistent with existing land uses and the Land Development Code (LDC).
Policy 1.1.1.1 of the Future Element of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan states that the
maximum intensity for development within the Industrial future land use designation is 40-50% of the
site for building. Should the rezoning be approved, the applicant would be required to submit a site
plan that satisfies all Land Development Codes including screening and buffering of the surrounding
properties. According to Policy 1.1.11.3 the following standards shall be used in determining the
suitability of new property(s) for designation as Light Industrial under the County's Land
Development Regulations:
~
.....,
February 10, 2004
Page 2
Subject: Palms & Tropical Trees Rezoning
File No.: RZ-03-D44
1) Light Industrial property should have available to it central water services necessary for both
domestic and the fire protection purposes. The subject property is located within the FPUA
(Ft. Pierce Utility Authority) service delivery area. FPUA services properties to the north, any
proposed development within this area will be required to extend the water lines from the
north into the subject property. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
2) Light Industrial property should not be located within 500 feet of any Aquatic Preserve or
other specially designated aquatic habitat. The subject property is not located within 500
feet of any Aquatic Preserve. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
3) Light Industrial areas should have immediate access to the regional transportation network.
The subject property has access to the following regional transportation networks: the FL
Turnpike to the south via Kings Highway and access to 1-95 to the east from Orange
Avenue. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
4) New Light Industrial property should have a minimum lot size of one acre. The subject
property is 20.41 acres in size. Therefore, this standard has been satisfied.
The permitted uses in the IL (Industrial Light) zoning district are not expected to unduly impact the
surrounding area, existing uses or public services. At the time of actual site development, the
petitioner will be required to satisfy all LDC standards and requirements dealing with landscaping
and buffering and basic site development standards.
Staff would note that Kings Highway within this area is 50-foot FDOT (Florida Department of
Transportation) arterial roadway. According to the most recent FDOT plans for the widening of
Kings Highway, the majority of the right-of-way improvements will occur on the west side of Kings
Highway. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for this site the developers will be required to
convey to the County the east 120 feet of the property along Kings Highway. This dedication is
required to facilitate the improvements of this roadway. It is recommended that the conveyance be
done as soon as possible so that development options for this property may proceed.
At the January 15, 2004, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning
Commission, by a vote of 7 to 1, with one member absent (Mr. Akins), recommended approval of
this petition as set forth in Draft Resolution 04-009.
This proposed change in zoning has been determined to meet the standards of review as set forth in
Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County LDC, and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives and
policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan.
Staff recommends that the Board approve the petition for a change in zoning from the AG-1
(Agricultural - 1 du!acre) zoning district to the IL (Industrial Light) zoning district as set forth in Draft
Resolution 04-009.
\.t
"-"
February 10, 2004
Page 3
Subject: Palms & Tropical Trees Rezoning
File No.: RZ - 03-044
If you have any questions, please let me know.
SUBMITTED:
cs
H:/wp/rezoning/Palms & Tropical Trees/bccagendalbccmemo.
CC: County Administrator
County Attorney
Planning Manager
Palms & Tropical Trees Depot, Inc.
File
'-"
.....,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
RESOLUTION 04-009
FILE NO.: RZ-03-044
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING
FROM THE AG-1 (AGRICULTURAL - 1 DU/ACRE)
ZONING DISTRICT TO THE Il (INDUSTRIAL LIGHT)
ZONING DISTRICT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST.
lUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the
testimony and evidence including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the following
determinations:
1. Palms and Tropical Trees Depot. Inc., presented a petition for a change in zoning
from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning district to the IL (Industrial Light)
zoning district for the property described in Part A below.
2. On January 15, 2004, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a
public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the
hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject
property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the
hereafter described request for a change in zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1
du/acre) zoning district to the IL (Industrial Light) zoning district for the property
described in Part A below.
3. On February 17, 2004, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after
publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners
of property within 500 feet of the subject property.
4. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies
of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of
Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code.
5. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the existing and proposed use of
property in the surrounding area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
County, Florida:
A. The proposed change in the zoning district classification for that property described
as follows and as depicted on the maps in Exhibit A:
23539 the North 1/2 OF the Northeast 1/4 OF the Southeast 1/4 -less the East 39 Feet for Road
and Canal Rights-of-Way (20.41 AC) (OR 336-2782)
File No,: RZ-03-044
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-009
Page 1
'-"
-...I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
Tax Id. No.
2302-411-0001-000/2
(Location:
West side of Kings Highway, approximately 2,500 feet south of Angle
Road, immediately south of Kraft Gardens.)
owned by Palms & Tropical Tees Depot, Inc., is hereby changed from the AG-1
(Agricultural- 1 du/acre) zoning district to the IL (Industrial Light) zoning district.
B. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authorized and
directed to cause the change to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie
County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this
resolution.
After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows:
Chairman Paula Lewis XXX
Vice-Chairman John Bruhn XXX
Commissioner Doug Coward XXX
Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 1 ¡th day of February 2004.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY
Chairman
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
Deputy Clerk
County Attorney
cs
H:\Wp\Rezoning\T eamsters\BCC\resolution. wpd
File No,: RZ-03-044
February 17. 2004
Resolution 04-009
Page 2
'"
'...I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 Exhibit A
10
11 Map Series
File No.: RZ-03-044
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-009
Page 3
~
-....I
AGENDA ITEM 3: PALMS AND TROPICAL TREES DEPOT - FILE NO. RZ-03-044:
Ms. Cyndi Snay, presenting Staff comments, stated that Agenda Item 3 is the application of
Palms & Tropical Trees Depot for a change in zoning from the AG-l zoning district to the IT...
(Industrial Light) zoning district for property located on the west side of Kings Highway,
approximately 2,500 feet south of Angle Road, directly south of the existing Kraft Garden
Nursery. She continued that the subject property is designated with an Industrial future land use
designation. She stated that the surrounding properties to the north, south and east are
designated with an Industrial future land use designation and the property to the west is
designated with a RS (Residential Suburban) future land use designation. She also stated that the
property located immediately to the south is currently being developed as an industrial park
(Kings Crossing Industrial Park).
Ms. Snay stated that the intended use for this rezoning is not expected to create significant
additional demands on any of the public facilities in this area. Currently, Kings Highway has a
right-of-way width of 50 feet. Staff stated that the ultimate right-of-way for Kings Highway is
130 feet. At the time of site plan review for the subject parcel additional right-of-way will be
required to be dedicated to the County. Also, according to the most recent FDOT plans for the
widening of Kings Highway, the majority of the roadway improvements are slated to occur on
the west side of Kings Highway.
Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that the proposed petition conforms to the
Standards of review as set forth in the Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the
goals, objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward
the applicant's petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of
approval.
Mr. Hearn questioned if traffic studies were required to be done before any industrial light
development is approved. Ms. Snay explained that it is required as part of the site planning
process prior to development. Mr. Hearn questioned what the level of service on Kings Highway
was. Mr. Dennis Murphy stated that he believed that it was a level of service C, but that the
intersection at Angle Road and Kings Highway may be a problem area.
Chairman McCurdy questioned when the widening of Kings Highway was expected. Mr.
Murphy explained that there were no immediate funded plans. He continued that the State was
doing a PD&E study and that the County was trying to obtain right of way as projects were
submitted. He advised that some improvements would eventually be made but there were no
immediate plans.
Chairman McCurdy questioned if the petitioner or their agent was present. No one for the
applicant was present.
Mr. Hearn made a motion to continue the application of Palms and Tropical Trees Depot,
Inc. to the January 15, 2004, Planning and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting at 7:00
p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible because the applicant was not there to represent the
application.
Motion seconded by Ms. Morgan.
P & Z 1 LPA Meeting
December 18, 2003
Page 7
~
~
Upon a roll call vote the motion was approved unanimously (with a vote of 7-0) to continue
the application of Palms and Tropical Trees Depot, Inc. to the January 15, 2004, Planning
and Zoning Commission Regular Meeting at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible.
P & Z 1 LPA Meeting
December 18,2003
Page 8
\w;
.J~~i" '~" 'i'ùr~ I.! 1
" I! < .' r, . .:....
.' · I.,. ,j' U.9U.. .:~...
SUB]['T TO
FLANN, NG & lO~'NQ
PALMS AND TROPICAL TREES DEPOT. IN~"îHJPPROVAl
AGENDA ITEM 5:
RZ-03-044:
Ms. Snay, presenting Staff comments, stated that Agenda Item # 5 was the application of
Palms & Tropical Trees Depot for a Change in Zoning from the AG-l zoning district to
the IL (Industrial Light) Zoning District for property located on the west side of Kings
Highway, approximately 2,500 feet south of Angle Road, directly south of the existing
Kraft Garden Nursery. The subject property is designated with an Industrial future land
use designation.
Ms. Snay stated that the surrounding properties to the north, south and east are designated
with an Industrial future land use designation and the property to the west is designated
with a RS (Residential Suburban) future land use designation. The property located
immediately to the south of the subject property is currently being developed as an
industrial park (Kings Crossing Industria] Park).
Currently, Kings Highway has a right-of-way width of 50 feet. Staff would note that the
ultimate right-of-way for Kings Highway is 130 feet. At the time of site plan review for
the subject parcel additional right-of-way will be required to be dedicated to the County.
Also, according to the most recent FDOT plans for the widening of Kings Highway, the
majority of the roadway improvements are slated to occur on the west side of Kings
Highway. As part of any development plans for this land parcel, the development will be
required to prove that sufficient public facilities are available to meet the development
demands.
Staff has reviewed this petition and detennined that the proposed petition confonns to the
Standards of review as set forth in the LDC and is not in conflict with the goals,
objectives and policies of the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that this board
forward the applicant's petition to the BOCC with a recommendation of approval.
Chainnan McCurdy questioned if the applicant or a representative was present.
Mr. Abraham Zafrani, 2800 S. Flamingo Drive, stated that he was applicant and agreed
with Staff's recommendation.
Ms. Hammer questioned what the applicant had in mind for the property in the future.
Mr. Zafrani stated that he was thinking about an industrial park or some type of industrial
uses, but no definite plans as of now.
Chairman McCurdy opened the public hearing.
Seeing no one, Chairman McCurdy closed the public hearing.
Mr. Menitt stated that he feels a PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) request
wou]d have been more appropriate and would also like to have some sort of landscaping
requirement.
P&Z! LPA Regular Meeting
January 15,2004
Page 10 of 18
....., UNOfftCIA\.-
SUBJECT TO, ION\.
r-::~~ON APPROVAl
Mr. Hearn questioned what type of ]andscaping would be required if rezoned to IL
(Industrial, Light). Ms. Snay explained that an 8-foot wall that has 60% on the outside
and 40% on the inside. She continued that along Kings Highway would have IS-feet of
landscaping and any vehicular area would also require additional landscaping.
'-"
Mr. Hearn questioned how long the applicant has owned the property. Mr. Zafrani stated
that he has only owned the property for about three months. He continued that he
currently has no immediate plans but has some investors interested in developing it
industrially but that requires the zoning change.
Mr. Trias stated that it might be a good idea for the County to consider drafting some sort
of landscape plan for the major corridors, such as Kings Highway.
Mr. Grande stated after considering the testimony presented during the public
hearing, including Staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in
Section 11.06.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of
County Commissioners grant approval to the application of Abraham Zafrani,
Palms and Tropical Trees Depot, Inc., for a Change in Zoning from the AG-l
(Agricultural - 1 dulacre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning
District because it's consistent with the surrounding area and doesn't infringe on
any inconsistent existing owners.
Mr. Hearn questioned if this applicant would be required to meet with any new landscape
requirements in the future. Ms. Snay stated that if they submit a site plan and it has not
been approved at the time any new requirements are approved, they would be required to
meet the new requirements.
Motion seconded by Mr. Lounds.
Upon a roll call vote the motion was approved with a vote of 7-1 (with Ms. Hammer
voting against) and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a
recommendation of approval.
P&Z! LPA Regular Meeting
January 15,2004
Page 11 of 18
'-'
....,
..
BOARD OF
COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
~=r.~eI~IE- ,::" '.
~'.,.
: CO,UNTY )~".
{; ... F. ..1:::,..< 0 . 'Iff" L:1:D ' A" ";.'~
,." ~>-..>" ~ ~'" ". . '.' .
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
'1
February 2, 2004
In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that PALMS
AND TROPICAL TREES DEPOT, INC., has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from
the AG-l (Agricultural - 1 dulacre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District for the
following described property:
Location:
West side of Kings Highway, approximately 1700 feet north of the intersection
of Kings Highway and 1-95, immediately south of Kraft Gardens.
THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AILABLE UPON REQUEST
The second public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on
February 17,2004, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex,
2300 VirginÚl Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard
at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The
County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least 3
days prior to a scheduled hearing.
County policy discourages communication with individual County Commissioners on any case outside of the
scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or provide written comments for the record.
The proceedings of the County Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any
decision made by the County Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,
he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of
the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn
in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying
during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie
County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-
1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new
owner. Please call (772) 462-1960 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number RZ-03-044.
Sincerely,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
!;" " '
..' (/. \-,L i^ /'...'
I r./,'L L ¡:;Í' !)0;< c '--( j / ¡,.\ IC~~
Paula Lewis, Chair
JOHN D. ßRUHN, Disrricr No, 1 . DOUG COWARD, Disrricr No, 2 . PAULA A, LEWIS, Disrricr No, J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, Disrricr No, 4 . CLIFF ßARNES, Districr No, 5
Counry Adminisrroror - Douglas M, Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652
Administration: (772) 462-1590 · Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GIS/Technical Services: (772) 462-1553
Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 · Fax: (772) 462-1581
Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 · Fax: (772) 462-2132
www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us
~ ¡. I~: Prpl~;I&IIIII~~.'~ J: :&11:'- i~ ~ 111~ei~~~j ä;'l=i~!¡; !i:1 )1 I:¡
v ~ I -!e~~r "'¡i~ . ~ ,_aa" J~ liiRE~I:a 1~!II!~i~I:1 ·1 ail
~ i ~ ~'~!~l': ! I Jr." ! ~~J~. (.;I.t !¡i= J. ·ÜJ
'! ,. ~.,.gg j!! ~ It :¡J¡~~!I· grq~ ¡, if i~1
i ; ~~p.e~ II ~ Si r,~. r,,¡f,~\ ~~ iJi~;
I =fi liiili~~ il!i!ìiil 1, I~ !!e~a I ,I ã§!:¡!,·I¡1 1·1 ¡:I,I,;I ' "1
¡ ~ ~Ici;~ill;f'llirlll II I· :1 ¡'~~ II il-II;;!¡¡!IiI 11·~!i·I!'ii i~~ JiJ.~ Ii!
ª fi I~ f!=a"!I"''' ta. = 'I~r"ll ,. ~"aI·i;rÞ. ! ~&i!aÜd y~ I :Ii
i . ~ i:! iln:~:;~~G~. J ~ ti I ! 9!~~ )1 ~~191 iji~If.¡ I:~ . Ïi J:¡
~I d. ~ ¡~~!~!~ñi !j ~ q II!i j ~I t.u;ìÞI t~~,~! ~ Ilil I
~~ " M ~~il¡~1 ¡ J Ù ~ ! rll ! Ii . ~.~~ J~li~,~ ir~ Hi ¡ili ,;.
,d ill i~hll:l;lu,11 ;J 91_" i ,I Ii~!~.!~i fdbli~J II~~ I if U'. I!~
-
" ,. Ii! II I I _. ! i; Ii Ii i
1; i i I 1f.!!"1 'I oaf; ~ I f J! ! ~, ! ß
JI!Î !j;rd,li iÏi.W ,ii~ = PI P ~ II
I J · III "I-Ii ~! I :I~caM~!lal 11 I r ~ "" 1 9 I '·1 Ii
), fll ,I ~i!!.1 I :3(ii'd-U I I I- i ~ I;: II t I~ -
II J ! J i1 S .jdtal!l" a ~ i'I'~¡I§'Ea cl= i ~ j I :II I; Ii I 1r1¡i¡- ii
I I, I ¡ J :11 · :~:al i fi~1 I j¡lii~ c: I ~ ~ J (, Cj!~ g I ! 'I
F :~IIIII J 11!1~Jiu! ~ l'I=~~~'iiil!~ ! M ~ II! !! n =!' ~ I ß
II IJ -. ..!~ ~.m~"l111 110 ~'~á' :~, II' I f!¡ iii U !Ii 5 fEr Jr.
iJ !1 i !ill i!r~i I! '. f !.Sii II if it :h¡ ai ~ ;¡ i s¡ Ifll
i!HI i! d !! !,~e¡511~1' g 1~P.I§li~d i Ü ! I R ~ ~ ~ ~ I. ~: Ji!
5' Ii: 11.. I '. Sklï I II ~i !!. 'i~~1i1 i .~ a I .. I '! i I a , I
! Itlll! II cg ,111'11 ~Iï 't aiilGêl~.! J ; 1 ø i , ,.., , ! I ifJ~ II
~
..¡
PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 12/18/03
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
(Planning Division)
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Planning Manager {7ftL
DATE: December 11, 2002
SUBJECT: Application of Palms & Tropical Trees Depot, Inc., for a change in
zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning district to the IL
(Industrial Light) zoning district. (File No.: RZ-03-044)
LOCATION: On the west side of Kings Highway, approximately 2,500
feet south of Angle Road, directly south of the Kraft
Garden Nursery.
EXISTING ZONING: AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre)
PROPOSED ZONING:
FUTURE LAND USE:
PARCEL SIZE:
PROPOSED USE:
IL (Industrial Light)
IND (Industrial)
20.41 acres
The purpose of the requested change in zoning is to allow
the development of an industrial park development.
PERMITTED USES:
Section 3.01.03(T), IL (Industrial Liaht) identifies the
designated uses which are permitted by right, permitted as
an accessory use, or permitted through the conditional use
process in the IL (Industrial Light) Zoning District. Any use
designated as a "Conditional Use" is required to undergo
further review and approval. Any use not identified in the
zoning district regulations is considered to be a prohibited
use in that district (see Attachment "A").
SURROUNDING ZONING:
AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning district surrounds
the petitioned property to the north, east and west; IL
(Industrial Light) to the south and IX (Industral Extraction)
to the southwest.
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
The property to the north is an active plant nursery (Kraft
Gardens). to the south is a proposed industrial park (Kings
~
'...I
November 11,2003
Page 2
Subject: Palms & Tropical Tree Depot, Inc.
File No.: RZ-03-044
Crossings); to the east and west is pasture land. The
property located to the north, south and east are
designated with an IND (Industrial) future land use
designations, properties located to the west are designated
with a RS (Residential Suburban) future land use
designation.
FIRE/EMS PROTECTION:
Station #4 (2850 Aviation Way) is located approximately 2-
miles to the northeast.
UTILITY SERVICE:
The subject property is located within the FPUA service
delivery area.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
RIGHT-OF-WAY
ADEQUACY:
See Comments
SCHEDULED
IMPROVEMENTS:
TYPE OF CONCURRENCY
DOCUMENT REQUIRED:
See Comments
Concurrency Deferral Affidavit.
****************************************
STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
In reviewing this application for the proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission
shall consider and make the following determinations:
1 . Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the
St. Lucie County Land Development Code;
The applicant is requesting a change in zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre)
zoning district to the IL (Industrial Light) Zoning District. The area in which the subject
property is located is currently vacant land with natural vegetation which has been
impacted by exotic species. The stated purpose of this change in zoning is to allow for
the development of a ± 21-acre industrial park. The subject property is adjacent to North
Kings Highway, which is a state owned North/South Arterial roadway.
The IL (Industrial Light) Zoning District has been determined to be an acceptable zoning
district as the existing future land use designation is IND (Industrial)
'-'
""'"
November 11, 2003
Page 3
Subject: Palms & Tropical Tree Depot, Inc.
File No.: RZ-03-044
2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the 51. Lucie
County Comprehensive Plan;
Table 1.6 of the Future Land Use Element, Data and Analysis, indicates those zoning
classifications allowed under the IND (Industrial) Future Land Use Designation.
According to this table, the IL (Industrial Light) Zoning District is considered to be
acceptable within the areas designated with a Future Land Use Classification of INO
(Industrial).
3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the
existing and proposed land uses;
The proposed zoning district is considered to be consistent with existing and proposed
future land use designations in the area. The surrounding properties to the north, south
and east are designated with an IND (Industrial) future land use designation; the
properties to the west are designated with a RS (Residential Suburban) future land use
designation. The property located to the north is being utilized as a commercial nursery,
the property located to the south is currently being developed as an industrial park, the
property to the east is pasture land and the property to the west is pasture land and
mining. The permitted uses in the IL (Industrial Light) Zoning District are not expected to
unduly impact the surrounding area or uses.
4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment;
Conditions have changed so as to require an amendment. On October 21, 2003, the
Board of County Commissioners approved a rezoning application for the property
located to the east from the AG-1 (Agricultural 1 du/acre) zoning district to the IL
(Industrial Light) zoning district. As the Kings Highway corridor develops, the County
will experience pressure to allow more intense uses adjacent to the roadway corridor.
The applicant's request would continue the more intense industrial development
adjacent to Kings Highway.
5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed
amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not
limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage,
schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities;
The intended use for this rezoning is not expected to create significant additional
demands on any public facilities in this area. The State of Florida Department of
Transportation is currently resurfacing the King's Highway roadway from Okeechobee
Road north to Angle Road. The FOOT has completed the resurfacing of the roadway in
the vicinity of the proposed site. The existing right-of-way for South Kings Highway,
adjacent to the subject property is 50 feet in width. According to Section 7.04.04 of the
St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the ultimate right-of-way for North Kings
Highway from Orange Avenue north to St. Lucie Boulevard is 130 feet. Based upon this,
'-
...."
November 11,2003
Page 4
Subject: Palms & Tropical Tree Depot, Inc.
File No.: RZ-03-044
at the time of site plan approval for the subject property additional right-of-way may be
required to be dedicated to the County for the widening of Kings Highway. According to
the most recent FOOT plans for the widening of Kings Highway, the majority of the
roadway improvements and right-of-way widening will occur on the west side of Kings
Highway.
At the time of development, a review of the available public facility capacity will be
completed. All impacts will be assessed for the development at that time. The FPUA
has the proposed area designated within its service delivery area. Prior to obtaining site
plan approval, the developer will be required to illustrate that sufficient capacity is
available to meet the demands/needs of any development proposed for the site.
6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
significant adverse impacts on the natural environment;
The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural
environment. The existing use of the property is vacant vegetated land, that has been
impacted by exotic vegetation. The applicant/property owner will be required to comply
with all federal, state, and local environmental regulations as part of any submitted
development plans for the site.
7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an
orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative
affects of such patterns;
An orderly and logical development pattern will occur with this change in zoning for the
subject property. The subject property has been designated for industrial uses within the
St. Lucie County Future Land Use Map.
8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest,
and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code;
The proposed change in zoning for the subject property would not be in conflict with the
public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County
Land Development Code.
COMMENTS
The petitioner, Palms & Tropical Trees Depot, Inc., has requested this change in zoning from
the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning district to the IND (Industrial) Zoning District in order
to develop a ±21-acre parcel of land as an industrial park, for property located on the west side
of North Kings Highway, approximately 2,500 feet south of Angle Road (immediately south of
the Kraft Garden Plant Nursery). The indicated purpose of this change in zoning is to allow for
the submission of an application for site plan review for an industrial project. The subject
'-
""'"
November 11 , 2003
Page 5
Subject: Palms & Tropical Tree Depot, Inc.
File No.: RZ-03-044
property is in an area designated within the Comprehensive Plan as being compatible with or for
the IL (Industrial Light) Zoning District.
Attached is a copy of Section 3.01.03(T) - IL (Industrial Light), of the St. Lucie County Land
Development Code, which delineates the permitted, accessory and conditional uses allowed in
the IL (Industrial Light) Zoning District. If the change in zoning request were approved, the
applicant, by right, would be allowed to establish any of the uses under the Permitted Uses
section. Any use under the Accessory Uses section would be allowed only if one or more of
the permitted uses exists on the subject property. Any use under the Conditional Uses section
could only be allowed if it first receives approval through the Board of County Commissioners.
Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that the proposed petition conforms to the
Standards Of Review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in
conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan.
Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a
recommendation of approval of the petitioner's request for a change in zoning from the AG-1
(Agricultural 1 du/acre) zoning district to the IL (Industrial Light) zoning district.
Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter.
DPKlcs
cc: Abraham Zafrani, Palms & Tropical Tree Depot, Inc.
File
H:\wp\rezoning\Palms and Tropical Trees Depot\stfrpt.wpd
'-'
..."
November 11 , 2003
Page 6
Subject: Palms & Tropical Tree Depot, Inc.
File No.: RZ-03-044
Suggested motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested change in zoning.
MOTION TO APPROVE:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING,
INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN
SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE
THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE
COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT APPROVAL TO THE
APPLICATION OF ABRAHAM ZAFRANI, PALMS AND TROPICAL TREES DEPOT, INC.,
FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE AG-1 (AGRICULTURAL - 1 DU/ACRE) ZONING
DISTRICT TO THE IL (INDUSTRIAL LIGHT) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE ....
[CITE REASON[S] WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC].
MOTION TO DENY:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING,
INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN
SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE
THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE
COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPLICATION OF ABRAHAM
ZAFRANI, PALMS AND TROPICAL TREES DEPOT, INC., FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING
FROM THE AG-1 (AGRICULTURAL - 1 DUlACRE) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE IL
(INDUSTRIAL LIGHT) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE....
[CITE REASON[S] WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC].
\..,.
...,¡
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
(
3.01.03
ZONING DISTRICTS
A.
AG-1
AGRICULTURAL - 1
1 . Purpose
The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for productive
commercial agriculture, together with such other uses as may be necessary to and compatible with
productive agricultural surroundings. Residential densities are restricted to a maximum of one (1)
dwelling unit per gross acre. The number in "0" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC
code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under
the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this Code.
2. Permitted Uses
a. Agricultural production - crops (01)
b. Agricultural production - livestock & animal specialties (02)
c. Agricultural services (07)
d. Family day care homes. (999)
e. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of
one thousand (1,000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that
the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) notifies
the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed
by HRS. (999)
f. Fishing, hunting & trapping (09)
g. Forestry (08)
h. Kennels. (0752)
i. Research Facilities, Noncommercial (8733)
j. Riding stables. (7999)
k. Single-family detached dwellings. (999)
3. Lot Size Requirements
Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00.
4. Dimensional Regulations
Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00.
5. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements
Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00.
6. Landscaping Requirements
Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00.
7. Cond~onalUses
a. Agricultural labor housing. (999)
Adopted August 1. 1990
94
Revised Through 08101/00
'-'
....",
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
b. Aircrc. ¡ storage and equipment maintenance. (4581)
c. Airports and flying, landing, and takeoff fields. (4581)
d. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1,000) feet of another such
family residential home. (999)
e. Farm products warehousing and storage. (4221/4222)
f. Gasoline service stations. (5541)
g. Industrial wastewater disposal. (999)
h. Manufacturing:
(1) Agricultural chemicals (287)
(2) Food & kindred products (20)
(3) Lumber & wood products, except furniture (24)
i. Mining and quarrying of nonmetalic minerals, except fuels. (14)
j. Retail trade:
(1) Farm equipment and related accessories. (999)
(2) Apparel & accessory stores. (56)
k. Sewage disposal subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.13. (999)
I. Telecommunication Towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999)
m. Camps - sporting and recreational. (7032)
8. Accessory Uses
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following:
a.
b.
c.
Mobile homes subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.05.
Retail trade and wholesale trade - subordinate to the primary authorized use or activity.
Guest house subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.04. (999)
(
Adopted August 1, 1990
95
Revised Through 08/01/00
T.
1. Purpose
\w
-....I
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
!L
(
INDUSTRIAL. LIGHT
The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for light manufacturing,
wholesale, and warehousing activities that do not impose undesirable noise, vibration, odor, dust, or
other offensive effects on the surrounding are, together with such other uses as may be necessary
to and compatible with light industrial surroundings. The number in "0" following each identified use
corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to
a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code.
2. Permitted Uses
a.
b.
Business services (73)
Communications - including telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section
7.10.23 (48)
Construction services:
(1) Building construction - general contractors (15)
(2) Other construction - general contractors (16)
(3) Construction - special trade contractors (17)
Engineering, architectural and surveying services (871)
Commercial fishing (091)
Laundry, cleaning & garment services (721)
Local & suburban transit (41)
Manufacturing:
(1 ) Food and kindred products (20)
(2) Tobacco products (21)
(3) Textile mill products (22)
(4) Apparel & other finished products (23)
(5) Furniture & fixtures (25)
(6) Printing, publishing and allied industries (27)
(7) Drugs (283)
(8) Leather & leather products (31)
(9) Glass:
(a) Flat glass (321)
(b) Glass & glassware - pressed or blown (322)
(c) Glass products - made of purchased glass (323)
(10) Fabricated metal prod. - except machinery & transport. equip.:
(a) Metal cans & shipping containers (341)
(b) Cutlery, handtools & general hardware (342)
(c) Heating equipment, except electric and warm air, and plumbing fixtures (343)
(d) Fabricated structural metal products (344)
(e) Coating, engraving & allied services (347)
(f) Miscellaneous fabricated metal products -
(1 ) Wire products (3495)
(2) Misc. fabricated wire products (3496)
(3) Metal foil & leaf (3497)
(4) Fabricated metal products - NEC (3499)
(11) Industrial/commercial machinery & computer equipment:
(a) Metalworking machinery & equipment (354)
(,
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
121
Revised Through 08/01/00
Adopted August 1, 1990
(
o.
p.
q.
r.
s.
(b) Special industry machinery, except metalworking machinery (355)
(c) General industrial machinery & equipment (356)
(d) Computers & office equipment (357)
Electronic & other electrical equipment and components. except computer
equipment:
(a) Household appliances (363)
(b) Electric lighting & wiring equipment (364)
(c) Household audio & video equipment (365)
(d) Communications equipment (366)
(e) Electronic components & accessories (367)
(f) Misc. electrical machinery equipment & supplies (369)
Measuring, analyzing and controlling instruments (38)
Photographic. medical and optical goods (38)
Watches & clocks (38)
Misc. manufacturing industries:
(a) Jewelry, silverware, and platedware. (391)
(b) Musical instruments and parts. (393)
(c) Dolls, toys, games & sporting goods (394)
(d) Pens, pencils, & other office & artists' materials. (395)
(e) Costume jewelry, costume novelties, and notions. (396)
(f) Brooms and brushes. (3991)
(g) Signs and advertising displays. (3993)
(h) Morticians goods. (3995)
(i) Manufacturing industries, NEC. (3999)
Plastic products - fabrication, molding, cutting, extrusion, and injection processing.
(308)
Marinas (4493)
Millwork and structural wood members. (243)
Motion pictures (78)
Motor freight transportation & warehousing. (42)
Repair services:
(1) Automotive & automotive parking (75)
(2) Electrical (762)
(3) Watch, clock & jewelry repair (763)
(4) Reupholstery & furniture repair (764)
(5) Misc. repairs & services (769)
Retail trade:
(1) Lumber & other building materials (521)
(2) Paint, glass & wallpaper (523)
(3) Hardware (525)
(4) Nurseries, lawn & garden supplies (526)
(5) Mobile home dealers (527)
(6) Automotive/boatlRV/motorcycle dealers (55)
(7) Gasoline service (55)
(8) Furniture & furnishings (57)
Research, development, and testing services. (873)
Ship, boat building & repairing -less than forty-five (45) ft. (373)
Sorting, grading & packaging services - citrus/vegetables (0723)
Vocational Schools (824)
Wholesale trade - durable goods:
'-'
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
i.
j.
k.
I.
m.
n.
L
Adopted August 1, 1990
122
'wi
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
Revised Through 08101/00
'-'
"-"
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
t.
(1) Motor vehicle and automotive equipment. (501)
(2) Furniture and home fumishings.(502)
(3) Lumber and other building materials. (503)
(4) Professional & commercial equipmenUsupplies. (504)
(5) Metals & minerals except petroleum. (505)
(6) Electrical goods. (506)
(7) Hardware, plumbing and heating equipment, and supplies. (507)
(8) Machinery, equipment, and supplies. (508)
(9) Misc. durable goods:
(a) Sporting and recreational goods (5091)
(b) Toys & hobby goods (5092)
(c) Jewelry, watches, precious stones & metals. (5094)
(d) Durable goods NEC (5099)
Wholesale trade - nondurable goods:
(1) Paper and paper products. (511)
(2) Drugs (512)
(3) Dry goods and apparel. (513)
(4) Groceries and related products. (514)
(5) Farm products - raw materials. (515)
(6) Chemicals, and allied products. (516)
(7) Beer, wine, and distilled alcoholic beverages. (518)
(8) Misc. nondurable goods:
(a) Farm supplies (5191)
(b) Books, periodicals & newspapers (5192)
(c) Flowers, nursery stock & florists' supplies (5193)
(d) Tobacco/tobacco products (5194)
(e) Paints, varnishes & supplies (5198)
(f) Nondurable goods, NEC (5199)
Mobile food vendors (999)
Single family detached dwelling units provided that the single family dwelling unit is located
on an existing lot or parcel or record, as further defined in this code, that was existing on or
before August 1, 1990. (999)
u.
v.
3. Lot Size Requirements
Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
4. Dimensional Regulations
Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
5. Offstreet Parking and Loading Requirements
Offstreet parking and loading requirements are..subject to Section 7.06.00.
6. Landscaping Requirements
Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00.
Adopted August 1, 1990
123
Revised Through 08/01/00
(
(
'-'
""""
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
(
7.
Conditional Uses
a. Airports, landing and takeoff fields - general aviation (4581)
b. Manufacturing:
(1) Cut stone and stone products. (328)
(2) Motorcycles, bicycles, and parts. (375)
(3) Wood containers, wood buildings and mobile homes. (2441245)
c. Ship, boat building & repairing (excluding ship or boat salvaging) - Forty-five (45) to one-
hundred fifty (150) ft (373)
d. Wholesale:
(1) Petroleum bulk stations and terminals.
e. Scrap and waste materials - subject to the provisions of Section 7.10.12.A.
8. Accessory Uses
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00 and include the following:
a. Co-generation facilities. (999)
b. Fueling facilities. (999)
c. Industrial wastewater disposal. (999)
d. One detached single-family dwelling or mobile home for on-site security purposes per
property. (999)
e. Retail trade accessory to the primary manufacturing or wholesaling use. (999)
¡.
Adopted August 1, 1990
124
Revised Through 08/01/00
\¡.p ....,
en a._ Z
(l)
(l) ~I
10-
~
ctS . ~
ÜÜ
.- C ~ -$' j í i
Q..- 9
O~
10-0 cry 'i~ II
~Q.. 0 ~
oð¿S N
() ~ J
en a: \ c.
E
ctS
0..
II:
+
...
'"
'"
II:
~
Z
:J ~
0
ü C Z
:J
.......0 -- 0
0·- - ......... tiWCII Ujóì:iiiomo~ Ü
a: Q).......
w . __ crs - ,."" .....
> 0° i
æ '-0 z
... 0...--1 ... ¡:::
:II I :II a:
I' ioIIiwn ~
-- àíDI ~
II: II:
Z
~
ëi ..l-J ,."')
~
"
!
... ...
P- I ~u ..
'" '"
II: II:
S IrS: 1
s ç, 1
s " 1
,
~
A1Nno~
3380H~33>10
~
...¡
A Petition of Palms & Tropical Trees Depot, Inc. for a Rezoning from AG-1
(Agricultural. 1dulacre) to IL (Industrial, Light).
o
--------:::::;:- -,
-- ......\1
11
~
,
'"
;::.
Ii
vi
"' I
'-- ~
..........', \
.........." JI
'~
~
i
]
~
.
~
z
Sf?
1\10
9
RZ 03-044
5è'.Á~&~
GIS -----ç>_""""
Map prepared November 14, 2003
t
~ This pattern indicates
subject parcel
Tht qp ~ beIn oampiIed torgennlptwning end ~ ~ orij. N
'WhiIII .-rt Iftort _ bMn tMdrI to prowidl .... molt CI.Af1t n:I 8CCtntII
~ JX*I*,a. notlntenôld Ioruee.. ~ I*dng c:IocumenI.
~
...."
Zonin
Palms & Tropical Trees Depot, Inc.
-~--o::::::::::- -.
-- .....\1
11
~
-...J , I
'-- ~
..........', \
..........', JI
'~
IX
RZ 03-044
o AG-1
AG-1
IL
IX
X-~~S~~'=
f
~ This pattern indicates
subject parcel
Map prepared November 14, 2003
--..-....-..--...--..... N
'^'* .,.., ...... been IMde to p'avidI '" m.- CUNI'II1nd ~
ink:wmIIIGn pgNiÞIt,ltil noI~ forUM.. legit;' bi'Idng doc::umer't.
'-'
....,
Land Use
Palms & Tropical Trees Depot, Inc.
0
RS
-::::.=-- ---:::;::- --,
- ....\1
11
~
......J ,I IND
'-- ~ ~
..........',
..........', JI i
'''''«J !
~
.
..i
III
'Ii
sf?
1\10
9
/....9$
RS
RZ 03-044
5k-.L~ ~~
GIS """<:.':-~
Map prepared November 14, 2003
f
W This pattern indicates
subject parcel
lliIrTIIP_laWIc:ompiIedfarQIfW.~ ao1d '*-ø~onIy, N
While ww; IIDrt * beIn rMde to prcMdIlhe moeI curenllnd a:ul'Me
InIom'IIØOn ~,it II not inIended lor... II . ~ bIncfng doc::u1Wt.
\w;
.."""
Palms & Tropical Trees Depot, Inc.
...~...·.IIf-.c. lit.! .ilil. ã;r.I.;.'.J..
.' . .~. IIfl!PI! ¡r.IÐJt!1i
i',·!I'·~···I¡' : I¡¡¡IF
. " .. -n II ! i+~!
Jt:Jlit:. ":: .!:~,l:~
~- .._~---.¡
I. t
~ ,\
f· ..
~ This pattern indicates
subject parcel
Map prepared November 14, 2003
f
RZ 03-044
5è .ÁH<>Û ~~,
GIS -=",>__=_
ThII rrç MI ~ oorr1)IIIcI torglnÞlpllmlng WId ~ purpoMI crit· N
\\NIl .-..ry effor1"- bien IMCM to pnMde the molt CUWIt and KiCUfåI
InIormItion poutIII, 1111 natinllndld rot WI . . ~ ~ doQ.mR.
'-'
.."
AGENDA - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
December 18, 2003
7:00 P.M.
PALMS AND TROPICAL TREES DEPOT, INC., has petitioned St. Lucie County for a
Change in Zoning from the AG-l (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial,
Light) Zoning District for the following described property:
Location:
West sûle of Kings Highway, approximately I 700 feet north of the
intersection of Kings Highway and 1-95, immediately south of Kraft
Gardens.
Please note that all proceedings before the Planning and Zoning Commission/Local
Planning Agency are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by
the Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered
at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes,
he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the
testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the
proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding
will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon
request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered.
Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners
December 3, 2003. Legal notice was published in The News and The Tribune, newspapers of
general circulation in St. Lucie County, on December 5, 2003.
File No. RZ-03-044
'-'
.....,
.....11œ --~~;m:~~'~~.~~
BOARD OF
COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
~=r. ~eJ e IE: - - -;..
COUNTY ,
F LOR I D A ,,;.-.
¢:~
-..- -
--,
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
December 3, 2003
In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that PALMS
AND TROPICAL TREES DEPOT, INC., has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from
the AG-l (Agricultural - 1 dulacre) Zoning District to the II.. (Industrial, Light) Zoning District for the
following described property:
Location:
West side of Kings Highway, approximately 1700 feet north of the intersection
of Kings Highway and 1-95, immediately south of Kraft Gardens.
THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AILABLE UPON REQUEST
The fIrst public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on
December 18, 2003, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex,
2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard
at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The
County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission at least
3 days prior to a scheduled hearing.
County policy discourages communication with individual Planning and Zoning Commission and County
Commission on any case outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or
provide written comments for the record.
The proceedings of the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to
appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any matter considered at
such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying
during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-
examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing
may be continued to a date-certain.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie
County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-
1777 orT.D.D. (772) 462-1428.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new
owner. Please call 772/462-1960 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number RZ-03-044.
Sincerely,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
~( /){¿~II&~
JOHN D. ßr>.u~ ~~{" Çl¡ageoWAr>.D, District No, 2 . PAULA A. LEWIS, District No. J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District NO.4. CLIFF ßAr>.NES, District No, 5
County Administrator - Douglas M, Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652
Administration: (772) 462-1590 · Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GISfTechnicol SeNices: (772) 462-1553
Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 · Fax: (772) 462-1581
Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 · Fax: (772) 462-2132
www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us
ft. ...~.
ST, UΠCOUNTY
PlMNING AMJZON-
INO COMMISSION
~ PU~~E,=,NO
~ o.combor II. 2003
)4 TO WHOM IT MAY CON·
I. CERN:
_ NOTICE ie horeby glvln
i ~¡a~~~:O.': a~i~~eS~:
Lucie County Lind De·
vllopment Cade end in
ICCOrdlnao wilh thl pro·
vilianl of Ihe 51. Lucie
County Comprehensivl
Plln. Ihll Ihl fallowing
Ipplieonls hive request·
ed Ihll Ihe SI. Lucie
County BOlrd a' Camp
mi..ionl,. consider
Iheir 'allowing requflll:
JOSEPH G, MilLER. lor I
fhhe"1~.Jn (;:r~~~fl::~'".
Òi~~~i:1 "~~e~h:a~~8
IPlanned Unit Dlvelop-
menl . Clrllan CaunlIY
Estltel) Zoning Dillrict
far the following de·
"ribod property:
IEING THE SOUTH
WEST 114 OF SECTION
11. TOWNSHIP 36
SDUTH. RANGE 38
EAST. ST, LUCIE COUN·
TY. FLORIDA. LESS
RIGHTS·OF·WAY FOR
CANAL NUMIERS 76
AND 77 OF THE NORTH
ST. LUCIE RIVER WA·
TER CONTROL DIS·
TRICT AND LESS THE
RIGHT·OF·WAY OF
IDEAL HOLDING ROAD,
.....,
Locltion:E.I' ,Ide af
Idlll Holding Raid. IP'
proxim,.e'ð 0.75 mile
~~~~h of k..chab.. I
PALMS AND TROPICAL
TREES DEPOT. INC" 'or
I Chlnge in Zoning
:~rr;; ~h1e d~~~1,.!Al;~r~~
Dil1rict 10 lhe IL (lndustr·
ill. Lighl) Zoning Dillrict
far the following de·
scribed property:
2 35 39 N 112 OF NE 114
OF SE 1/4 . LESS E 39 FT
FOR RD AND CANAL
RSIW . (20,41 AC) lOR
336-2782)
Loc.tion:W'lt ,ide of
King. Highway, appro.i-
mltely 1700 feel north Þ
of the intersection of (
Kingl Highwey Ind 1·95.
immediately south of f
Krlft Glrdenl.
PUILIC HEARINGS will :
be held in lhe Cammie· .
lion Chtmber.. Roger
poitr.. Annex. 3rd Floor,
St. Lucie County Admin-
illrltian Building. 2300
Virginil Avenue. Fort
Pierce, Floridl on De·
cember 18. 2003. begin.
ning It 7:00 P,M, or II
soon thl,.lfter II potli-
ble,
PURSUANT TO Seclian
216,0105. Flaridl SII"
utH. if . person decides
to Ippeal tny decision
mlde by I baird. Igen·
cy, or commission with
re.plct to any matter
considered at . melting
or hearing. he will need
rn;~~d o~h~~ r~~:h
purposel, he may need
to ,nlure thlt I verb.-
tim rlcord of the pro·
endings il made, which
record includes the tuti·
many .nd evidence
upon which Ihe Ippell
ilia be booed,
LOCAL PLANNING
. AGENCY/ PLANNING
I AND ZONING COMMIS·
. SION
51, LUCIE COUNTY.
FLORIDA
ISI Ed Mlrrill. Chli,,""n
I Publish: Oecember 5
: 2003 r-ß'
M\'WW. C.
r NOTICE OF INTENT
TO USE UNIFORM
METHOD OF COLLECT·
ING NON·AD VALOREM
ASSESSMENTS
'- N N N N N N ~~ N -3 ::0
w w w w w w w =
13 13 0 0 0 0 0 >I! = I'Þ
N N N N - -- - _" "CI
,þ.. ,þ.. ,þ.. - - - W W N - - ==
N - - ,þ.. W W N _ W W 0 = :¡
~W~..-Wþooo.-W"""",,,~N ao a
§§§§§§§§§§ '*" t""1'Þ
P¡;" =
1-ã¡""O.......~þooooI........-lJ'I......lJ\ .... ....
~~~~~~~~~~ ;0 a.
., ~
"Q
N a
Ë~f~ËË~ ",,::z::z z =a
II> II> CIJ = !.He
::I '< t"" ~ I =
Õ-<II>:::>ÕÕ5" Q. ~ ~ ~ -"
.., ..., ~ 0'" ... n ...,e¡n ~ ~~
.., 0 e¡ 0 t""Q.t;I ;00
f!; Q. '8 II> '" ., I'Þ
- 0 ::I ::z:: "Ø~
Q ~ ¡;j Q. ~
n - t"" !.S"
... 8- :r
0 ::I ~ ~ å
n ...
::I
< 1<0 a
'"
- -37'
0 ~ ~
....
:!1 -" Q
... ~ao
::I - .,
n -3=
.,"g.
..... ..... ..... ~ ñ"
..... Z fIJ _
0 0 0 0
'" II> '" '" = 0 =
0 ::s 0 0 a I'Þ ;0
"0 "0"0 "CI
:r tT1 :r :r I'Þ Q .,
0 00 N .r a
- =
....
= 5"
¡') =
Ë z CIJ
I'Þ
= .,
õ a <
... I'Þ ñ"
!.H I'Þ
fIJ
> Z
::I =
0 a
-
ñ I'Þ
CIJ ~
VI 00
VI N
8~
~~
::s
( (¡ VI
o 00
>:r
< CIJ
o -
....... ....... Ut V\
\0 VI VI VI
8~88
ozoo
g ~ ¡;j ¡;j
§ 5' Jg Jg
~oa 0 0
II> ::z::»
¡;;¡:~ëiëi
t""'<
::s
'*"
-
N
W
'i: VI-N>
O~~~=-
tJj \0 VI - =-
o OCIJCIJ a
>0: :0;- II> ..... fIJ
~ft 8.g
-. n t;I :0;-
g e. 5'
0"_'"
ft e¡ ::0
Q.
š:~
'<
61~~
;¡ ¡;, c
'i: ê. g.
õ' a-
M II>
o Õ
tJj
'<
...,
:r
o
CIJ
o
II>
'TJ'TJ'TJ
000
;¡ ;¡ ;¡
'i: 'i: 'i:
õ' õ' õ'
M M M
000
~61<61~
¡¡;;¡~;¡~
~ 'i: 0 'i:
II> õ' ~ õ"
M f!; M
o :r 0
~
~
.....
~
N
¡:;¡
ë
f1f1f1f1f1t!J~f1t!Jf1~
;-
W W
,þ..w
\0 -
.¡::. 0\
-. 0\
I ,
_ W
w,þ..
fð~
w w
,þ..,þ..
\0\0
,þ..,þ..
~~
w
o
w
o
-
I
--0
WW~
fðfð-.
W W N
~ ~-S"
,þ.. 00
-. -
, I
VlWVI
,þ..Nw
N\OVI
-' O\N
w
W W
~~
o\,þ..
N -.
¡",. . E!2/17l2E!04 11: 35 4E!7-595-9S£:'2
-f ,,~1~s',;:. '-"
~t"~": ,': .
ß'··
ST LUCIE BATT & TIRE
PAGE E!4
"'"
~6
Joseph G. Miller
, .' 5500 Orange Avenue
Fort 'Pierce, Florida 34947
'.
:'!.
R. f". .
pp:~1' .,.. 1ßof ,úft.
~
n- ' '
.~~G. ,.
."bu-- ~
~
.~ ,~ ·VJ~
,~ ,;t". L-
,(~ ~
t..v-- .
~r~'~
..~
JA'~
V·~ .,'~~
, "
.pti..L
.tß-
~'A
' '
,;ø.--., . '. .
~,ß,~,--- '
¡¿ ,- ~ J....Q
.i)cny·rf 1~'
~ ',C;~":.
d~~ ~,..
.1. ,,~...
tJ--,µ
"
2-fJ U I tLJ V
~
/0--
, .. .
~..~,...
. .....) .. ..... .........
, .
.'
02/17/2004 11:35
407-5'35-'38&2
ST LUCIE BATT & TIRE
PAGE 03
.,
'-' .
.....,
. .
RO,OF
NTY,,:
, :ISSION·EM,
, . .
. .
-
._.""......,..."'.:~..,."'.:::,:.
, " . - .' .
. .' "
, .'
, '. .<,. , .' .
, '. .' ,..,.<. " "
.=,-=,:' , ' " ,,' . ' T
'CC.MMUNITY
DEVI~LO,PMENT
DIRECTOR
, , febroiry 2. 2004. '.
. Jß accoJdance with tbe" 5t, LUc~ 'County Land Develòpme"~' oxic, you are bereby advise:" :that:.PALMS
ANDtROl'lCÀi TRBES DBPOT, INC., bas petitioned St. Lucie County fora Change m ZoDmg from
the AG~ 1 (Ågiiéult~ral .; ,I -d~icte) Zê?ning District to the n- (Industrial, Light) Zoning Distri':t for the
followingdè~ribed property:' .
. ' '
Location: .,.' "W~t skIe~ K1ngSHigbwày,àpproXimateJy 1700 (eet north or the intoedioD
.,_..... .'" 'c~,,"..s,Hiøh.wa1:md1-9S,iJnme4iat."Y'60.of~"""'·:'·"" .
,.' .
. '
. . . .' . '.
'. . . " .
THE PROPER.'I'Y'SLEGALDESCiUPTION IS A V AILABLÉ UPON REQUEST
, .
, '
, '
,~,¿eco~púlit ¡,Ø",oil tJit pidtiDit wili"e helllØl7:iJO P.M., Of' as SDon tlurtøft., Øs HI$.ibr., on
. F,,,,.,.,, 17¡ ZOØ4, Co,.~s¡¡'n"'s ChtmIlwis, ,Sf. I.ucW County ,A~II Bui~, .4.",.x,
, "J:M' YU'JilliØAve..ø, Fort PU~"FlOriIJ4. All interested persons will be given an opportamîty t(: be beard
'" ,at that u¡ne;, Written comments'received in àdvancc of' ,he public hearing will also be c~side~. The
,:County Pla.wng Djvision$tlO~iðreceive written c~ts to the Board of County Comnåssionert at least 3
: , days pfior to a Scheduled:ht;8i1ng. .. . .' ..
" CountY pOi.icy d¡~~aFs,ç~hicat1on \Nith individual eoµnty CoinrnÌssioncrs on any case out. ide of the
scheduled J>úblic hêaring(s); Y ou;nay speak at a public ~g, or proyide wriaen coinmeøts far tl,:eteCOOi.
. .'
" .
, .
. . .' " .
: ~ proceedirigs Of the' CoootýCQnØnissionare el~tronicallY recorded.· ·.If a person decides to aþpeå1 any
deCision øade, by 'tbe,Coùnty(~omJnis5ion with respect to any matter considered at such meeting (fr bearing,
· he will need a recOJd. of the' proceedinp. ' For such purpoSe, he may Deed.to ensÙle that a verbatÙl\ record of
: the PJocee4ings is made.~h~h record includes thetesû~y' and evidence upòn which the appe.al is to be
, 'based., Up thCrequest of .nýpmtyto ~ proceeding. individuals i£stifying duriDg a hearint wiI): be sworn
· in. Any,puty to the ))roceeding'wiD be granted'ap Op~uDity to cròss-~xanûne any indiyÍdual~te5tÌfying
· :. ' during a hé~ upòn r....t., If it bec0ffleS necessary..a public hearing may be continued toa datC:-certain.
. '. - ~ "
:Anyone with a ,disability, ièqu~nngacc.orrußodalion to attend this mceting~oold c~ntact tbesi. LuCie
c::ount)' CoJ:nffiimjry Servi~, Director at lea,t fOrty,eight (48) hours prior to tbe rneeting. at <'72) 462-
1777 or T.D.D. :(772) 462~1428.: .' .... . ",
',:::: 'If,yoù.DOlong~r~.Pr~:.djicCnt to the above-d~scribedp~el,pJease forward this notice 10 thencw
" "" 'owner: Please ¢aU(771) ~t_ if you have any questions, and refer to: fDe Num..er ~-4.
'SinceRly, , . .'. . " , . .' '. .' .' . . '
. sT. LUClÊ COumY ØÖARDOF COMMISSIONERS .
. I . -, . '. ..' ... " . . " "
,', (: .",,' ",.' '
({.[.,~"-~ (oj': !~~:'.:-(.":..r.: T/'r\';"~<i---: . . '. '
. P~ulaLewis,(]¡air ' .' .
Ol\UHN, DiStricl ~o, ,1 ~PÓÙG ·c.oIl{Ai\O:Ò¡Sr!~TN.Ò, 2,. PAULA A. ~nllS, OIIltI(INO, ) .'''ANNI£ t1vTCHIN~ON. D/tlner NO:4 . ';LlFF DAI\HÐ Ols,nc No ~ .
.. ,'., . CoUt'lry AdmlnlsrrorOl " Doug'( , M. And_non " . ' .'
. "·2JQO VirginioAvenue ~'Fort Píerce. FL J4962-5052 .
. ~dmí~istroti9n; (772.)4Ó2~15QQ,. PIOflning: (772)462-2622 .. GISIT~nlçol Services; á72):462~1~5J·
, . . .,: .. '.. . Ec<?nomic,~veolopmenr!(772)462.1550. Fex; (772)462-'1561 : ':
, ., To~nSt/C~nvE!-ririon: (772) 462.1529 · Fox: (772) 462·21032 .
. ." " www.co.sr-lucie.fLus
ST LUCIE BATT & TIRE
PAGE 02
02/17/2004 11:35
41117-595-9B62
'-'
f~ ~QR.....J,-¡"
I'P\ /A:ß. .' {µµ
.~ .' ~ h-<-~ G-y,f,...--tJO""·· '-t-V~'
<;/J.,.J.J . &-.' .¡.. ~ --ro 'pall' ,.<1A-:-"
\.V~ J~ - jJD l.,L)JI9'ÞS:·~
p ICrH r-s, .
,fF' ~.
....
.. (Â..
.~
..
...., .
Joseþh G. Miller
, 5500 Orange Avenue
Fort Pierce, Florida 34947
. .çt..~
M / ,...., / µe,.
. '!
~.' ïU-"-:-~
~'.
~.;-~-i·
~~¡.yA· .·£.fÁ-
J t.·~7. .
~~
'.
. .
. ;
:, '
4Ð7-595-9BG2
ST LUCIE BATT & TIRE
t-'Abt:. tH
Ð2/17/2ÐÐ4 11:35
'--
~.
'~~~Mf"""'~\~';~~~"'''-~'''~~
·CC)MMUMITY
DEVIELO'PMENT
':D'IRECTOR
:RD:O'F·
,NTY,
ISSIONEPiS
,"'.~.=r".':'~'.'~: ·ê·"~E· ......".~':,. .:. .:
.. COUNl'"Y ',..
. ~ LOR ! 0 1\ ,....
, .~.' - .,. '., " "..
.~ I I ~1_ìlt,,".L 1 --<-..411 ,-
,F,ebnw, 9;2004
, . .
, . . . ," . . . ," "
:IÐ' accordance wjth die' St.µwi~ :County Land Development Code. you are hereby adviseøthat Sr.:: LUCIE
.. CITRVS,MINE has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Conditional Use Permit to. allowfo.r tb~ üperation
: of a,sand mine in theAG~5, (Agriculturà1 - 1 dulS acres) Zoning District fo.r the fDJloWing :,,:cscribCCS'
property:. .. . .
Locøtion:
EuI side ,of Ideal Holding Road, .pproxbnatcly 600 feet .... "/~~b~iIe·. .
Drlvé. . . .: .
" . .. TH£.PROPER.rt'SL~ALDESCRIPTION IS AVAI~LEUPÓN:REQUEST'; .. ,'..
... _______....--.,.-. . 01 .,...: :..... '.. ,. .' . " . . . .. ,-. ...,... ..... .. ..~:. ~ ..J...._.... .... '_.-. '--.- .."--' ':,--,-,- -:---' ..~-:._._.:' ",
The ftrSt p~ INqrin,' 011. ~pi!titio" wiU bI lielil øt 7:fX) P.M., or as SOOIl tMref4lti!r tI$ ,o~~Iø, o~
Februiuy 19,'2004, QlluitJ Coiluit.I8li(iMr'sClulmbøn, St. LMck County A.dmi~on B"~ Annex, ,
" 2300 V;,puøÃ"IIU', FIid rNrc" FliJrl/Ja. AU interested persons will be giv~ an ~ty tQ¡ be heard i .
ai . tbØ ~ime, Writier(ê.O~rit5 rteeìved in advanCe pI the public hearing will also be cO"Isidcqed. Tbe .
County PÌaJ¡ning D1v~ioo shOtitd' ItCeíve writtencDmmcnts to die Planning and Zoning ~mtn,iSSi<."D at ~t .
3~s pri9fto a sc:heduled beàring.
. .. .
. . . . .
Colinty policy discourages: cÓ~ú~i~tjpn with individual PI_ng and Zoning· Commissio.rt anil· County
Co.1MÙssìon on any case' outside of ihe $cheduled~blic bearing(s). You may speak ata pub,li~ h:.mg, or
. . prOvide wrioert co.~nts for tbe record.
. : Thep.:oceédinp,of the Planning aOd ZQrnngCommission are eledronically recorded. If a peison <Iecides ~
. , . appeal ~y decisiórrmade by thè rtannin¡ and Zoning Commission with respect to any mauet (:on~idered àt
such incctÏJig'or bearing. he will need a.record of the proceedings. for such purpose, he' may need.to ensure
, that a'verbatiinrecord Df tbeptoeeedings is made. whic:b record includes the ie$timOny·aiKi ~vkk;nce, upòo.
: which the appeål, is to .1Je based. fJpOD the request: Df any party to. the p-ocèeding.iridivjslµals ;testifying'
. 'dùrjng a hearing w.m: be SWQII'1\ in; Any pany to tbe proceeding wìll be granted ·an 'oppDlbfßityf: to cross-
, ex8riúne any iridividualt'eStífyíng,dur,ing a bearing upon request If it becomes necessily~ à publíf;hcaring
· maybe cOntinued to a date-œ(tám. . .. ::~ · ,
. ,. " .
. . .. .
.. ~yOne,. with, a· disàbility requiring àccommodati~n to attend this meeting sbouid Ç()~a.ct i the5t. Lucie .
Cbunty Coinmu.!1ity 'Serviœs Dirct'tor Itt least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the rneetina :at (-;\72) ,462-'
, 1777 orTD.D.(172)·4~2-142~. ' . , . .
. '
.' . .
· If you ,no longer own PrOperty; adjacént to the above-described parcel, please foi'Wardthis~ce tt~ the Dèw
, owner. Please call (m) ,462-1~ jf you have any quesúons, and ·refcr [0: File Nu..mer: CV;'()3-:0::,~7.
. '
· Sincerely.
?Ä~~~~G.A~ZONlNG COMMISSION
CarsónMçCùrdy, CbIÜ.....' , "./A ~..
. . .
'. .
.D~~tiN. [)i5rrtc~ 1010. 1 . DoUG CO..,ARP, P""ICf ~o. '2,. PAULA A,. l£'W15. [)iwCa No, 3 . F'RANNtE HUTO/l'lSON, DtJrrlCf No. ~ ~ <-"-IFF BARNES, DI....ci No.'~ .
, . ..' , , :' '. CQUl\ry Admlnlsrra'OI . Douglas M, Andefson ' .: ' ,': . , . , : .
',. ·,'2300 Vir9i~ioAvenue · fon Pr.rce, Fl34962-56'2 ..... . .
,AdrT\inistrotiO('l: ('712) 462.·1'59Ò . Planning: (712)462-2622 · GISIT.cnnlcol Services: (772)'~4~à-1~~·
" ,EcOi'!omicDevélopm."r:(712)462-15SO . Fox: (772)462-1561 i. ~~ . .,
. Tourisf/CQI'Ive"don: (772) 462-1529 · Fax: (772) 462-2132 '
www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us
·
'-'
...."
COMMISSION REVIEW: February 17, 2004
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
(Planning Division)
MEMORANDUM
TO: County Commission
FROM: Dennis Murphy, Community Development Director
DATE: February 10, 2004
SUBJECT: Consider the petition of Reitano Enterprises, Inc., for a change in zoning from the
AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning district to the CG (Commercial General)
zoning district for 30 days (March 18, 2004). (File No.: RZ-03-043)
At the December 2, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners continued the petition of Reitano
Enterprises, Inc. to rezone a 2.15-acre tract of land located on the east side of Koblegard Road,
approximately 330 feet north of the intersection of Indrio Road and Koblegard Road, from the AG-1
(Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning district to the CG (Commercial, General) zoning district until
February 17, 2004. The reason for the continuance was to include the parcel of land into the North
County Charrette and determine whether or not the proposed use is consistent with the outcome of
the final charrette plan.
The North County Charrette has been scheduled for the week of February 7 through the 13th, which
will conclude with a public presentation of the outcome of the charrette input on February 13, 2004.
After this additional meetings will be held for the acceptance and adoption of the final charrette
master plan, Comprehensive Plan Amendments and Land Development Code amendments that
may result from the charrette outcome.
Based upon the charrette not concluding until February 13, 2004 staff recommends that the
applicant's petition be continued for a minimum of 30 days, March 16, 2004.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
SUBMITTED:
~
l\/~
/ \1 ,J\ëfj
__DßMÍs J. urphy, AICP .,i
Comm Ity Development Direc or
cs //
H:/Wp/rezoninglReitano/bcc/bc memo.con.doc
cc: County Administrator
County Attorney
Planning Manager
Richard Reitano
Joe Friscia
File
~
'-
To:
Submitted By:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
COMMISSION ACTION:
00 APPROVED
t=J OTHER
.....
Agenda Request
---
Óe-
2/17/04
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
Consider Draft Resolution 04-012 approving the request of Carlos unoz Quintana,
for a Major Adjustment to an existing Minor Site Plan and Condition I Use Permit to
allow the construction of a 9,040 square foot second story addition to the PSL
Moving & Storage Depot mini-warehouse and self-storage facility (File No.:
SPMN-03-008 and CUMJ-03-003)
'-
On March 7, 2000, this Board, via Resolution 00-007, granted Minor Site Plall
approval and Conditional Use Permit approval for the PSL Moving & Storage
Depot. The developers are now applying for a Major Adjustment to the existing Site
Plan and Conditional Use Permit to allow the addition of a 9,040 square foot second
story. The developer is proposing to utilize the additional 9,040 square feet for mini-
warehousing and storage use.
1
I
I
I
f
The proposed second story addition at the PSL Moving & Storage Depot facility !
has been determined not to have an undue or adverse effect upon nearby properties.
The subject property Is surrounded by commercia' uses to the north, south and east i
and residential uses to the west. The proposed project is consistent with the existing I
commercial development patterns along South US Highway One.
N/A
N/A
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-012.
CURRENCE:
D DENIED
\n .~..
.-
Approved 5-0
ouglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Coordination! Signatures
I"]
l·f
.'"
Mgt. & Budget:
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works: ~~"
Engineering: lt~; /
. ,
Other: '
County Attorney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
'-"
_ell~
COUNTY ~
FLORIDA
TO: County Commission
~
COMMISSION REVIEW: February 17, 2004
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
(Planning Division)
MEMORANDUM
FROM: Dennis Murphy, Community Development Director
DATE: February 10, 2004
SUBJECT: Petition of Carlos Munoz, PSL Moving & Storage Depot, for a Major Adjustmentlo
an existing Major Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of
an additional 9,040 square feet of storage space within the second floor of he project
known as PSL Moving & Storege Depot located in the CG (Commercial General)
Zoning District (File No.: SPMJ-03-008 and CUMJ-03-003)
LOCATION: West side of South U. S. #1, approximately 650 feet south ot
Ulrich Road.
ZONING DESIGNATION:
lAND USE DESIGNATION:
PARCEL SIZE:
PROPOSED USE:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
SURROUNDING lAND USES:
FIRE/EMS PROTECTION:
UTILITY SERVICE:
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
RIGHT -OF-W A Y
ADEQUACY:
CG (Commercial, General)
COM (Commercial)
2.14 acres
A 9,040 square foot second story addition to the existing mini-
warehouse and self storage facility known as PSL Moving &
Storage Depot
CG (Commercial, General) to the north, south and east; RS-2
(Residential, Single-family - 2 du/acre) to the west.
COM (Commercial) to the north, south and east, RU
(Residential Urban) to the west.
Station # 6 (350 East Midway Road) is located approximately
1 .5 miles to the north.
Private well water and septic sewer system.
The existing right-of-way width for U. S. Highway One is 120
feet.
'-'
...,
February 10, 2004
Page 2
Subject: PSL Moving & Storage Depot
File No.: SPMJ-03-00B and CUMJ-03-003
SCHEDULED
IMPROVEMENTS:
This segment of South US #1 is scheduled for widening to six
lanes in FY 04/05
TYPE OF CONCURRENCY
DOCUMENT REQUIRED:
Certificate of Capacity.
********************************************
STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
In reviewing this application for proposed conditional use, the Board of County Commissioners shall
consider and make the following determinations:
1. Whether the proposed conditional use is in conflict with any applicable portions of
the St. Lucie County Land Development Code;
The proposed 9,040 square foot addition to the existing PSL Moving & Storage Depot for
the purpose of operating a mini warehouse and self storage facility at 5801 South US #1 and
has been determined not to be in conflict with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code.
On March 7, 2000, through Resolution 00-007, the Board of County Commissioners
approved a Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit application submitted by Carols Munoz-
Quintana to allow the construction and operation of a 14,560 square foot mini-warehouse
and self-storage facility on a 2.12 acre parcel of land.
Upon receiving site plan approval, the petitioners moved forward through the building permit
process, obtained all necessary approvals and constructed their facility. During the
construction phase of the project, the St. Lucie County Building Department issued a permit
for an unfinished second story to the main building. Upon reaching a need to increase the
storage capacity of the facility into the second story of the project, it was noted that the
petitioners did not have specific approval for the additional storage area. The applicant is
now coming forward requesting approval to install the flooring and operate a second floor of
storage area on the site. The proposed site layout is consistent with all portions of the Land
Development Code.
2. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would have an adverse
impact on nearby properties;
The proposed second story addition to the PSL Moving & Storage Depot facility is not
expected to have an adverse impact on the nearby properties. The proposed site is located
within an area zoned for commercial businesses. The products will be stored entirely within
the building. The property directly to the north, Larry's Carpet, specializes in retail carpet
sales with outdoor storage to the rear of the property.
~
..",
February 1 0, 2004
Page 3
Subject: PSL Moving & Storage Depot
File No.: SPMJ-03-00B and CUMJ-03-003
3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would be served by
adequate public facilities and services, including roads, police protection, solid waste
disposal, water, sewer, drainage structures, parks, and mass transit;
This conditional use is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public
facilities in this area. The segment of South US #1 in which the proposed property is
located is scheduled to be widened from a 4-lane roadway facility into a 6-lane roadway
facility in FY 04/05.
The proposed property receives water and sewer thorough an on-site well and septic sewer
system. The subject area is located within the planned Fort Pierce Utility Authority (FPUA)
service delivery area. Upon the public facilities being provided within this area, the project
will required to tie-in into the public facilities.
4. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would result in
significant adverse impacts on the natural environment;
The proposed conditional use is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural
environment. The proposed lot was infested with exotic plants (Brazilian Pepper and
Maleluca) except for the location of some cabbage palm trees along the south boundary line.
The applicant indicated that these palm trees were to be preserved as part of the
landscaping along the property boundaries.
**********************************
STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW
Section 11.02.07, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code identifies the minimum
Standards of Reviewfor all proposed Site Plans. These standards must be met in order for any site
plan approvals to be considered. Staff has reviewed the request for a Major Adjustment to an
Existing Minor Site Plan, utilizing these requirements and notes the following:
A. CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The proposed building or use is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and
standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled
Laws of St. Lucie County; and the proposed use complies with all additional standards imposed on it
by the particular provisions of this Code authorizing such use and any other requirement of the Code
and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County.
The proposed addition to the PSL Moving & Storage Depot is consistent with the general purpose,
goals, objectives and standards of this Code and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County.
The proposed use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the particular provisions of
this Code authorizing such use and any other requirement of the Code and Compiled Laws of St.
Lucie County.
~
...;
February 10, 2004
Page 4
Subject: PSL Moving & Storage Depot
File No.: SPMJ-03-008 and CUMJ-03-003
The proposed addition to the PSL Moving & Storage Depot is consistent with the general purpose,
goals, objectives and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. These policies include,
but are not limited to:
. Policv 1. 1. 1. 1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes a maximum intensity
within the COM (Commercial land use category as 40% - 50% lot coverage by structure.
The building coverage intensity for the proposed project will be constructed on 15.77% of the
entire site.
. Obiective 1.1.5 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, states that future development
must be within the Planned Urban Service Area and directed to areas where urban and
community services/facilities can be provided in the most efficient and compact manner so
as to discourage the proliferation of urban sprawl. The proposed 9,040 square foot addition
to the PSL Moving & Storage Depot facility is located within the Urban Service Area and is
serviced with onsite water and sewer. Although, urban services are not currently available in
this area, the applicant has indicated that they will hook-up to the service as soon as it
becomes available.
B. EFFECT ON NEARBY PROPERTIES
1. The proposed building or use will not have an undue adverse effect upon nearby
property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility
facilities, and other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare.
The proposed 9,040 square foot second story addition to the PSL Moving &
Storage Depot has been determined not to have an undue or adverse effect upon
nearby properties. The subject property is surrounded by commercial uses to the
north, south and east and residential to the west. The proposed project is consistent
with the existing commercial development patterns along the east and west side of
US Highway One.
2. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the
proposed building or use on the immediate vicinity through building design, site
design, landscaping, and screening.
The proposed 9,040 square foot addition will be in the second story of the existing
building. No additional building construction other than interior renovations will be
required for this site. The applicant will be required provide for improved parking to
the rear of the property which is primarily infested with Brazilian Pepper which will be
required to be removed.
3. The proposed building or use will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not
to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance
with applicable district regulations.
The design of the proposed project has been determined not to interfere with the
development or use of neighboring properties, as may be regulated by the St. Lucie
County Land Development Code. The surrounding properties to the north, east and
'-'
....,
February 10, 2004
Page 5
Subject: PSL Moving & Storage Depot
File No.: SPMJ-03-008 and CUMJ-03-003
south are designated with a CG (Commercial General) Zoning District and to the
south is residential uses and therefore the proposed project is considered
compatible with the surrounding properties.
C. ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES
The proposed building or use complies with the standards of Chapter V, Adequate Public
Facilities.
The proposed 9,040 square foot second floor addition to the PSL Moving & Storage Depot
is not expected to cause any of the existing public facilities in this area to fall below current
Level of Service conditions.
The project will be utilizing an onsite well and septic system. The proposed site is located on
the west side of US Highway One within an area that does not have access to public
facilities and within the FPUA Service Area. Upon the installation of public utilities within this
area, the applicant has indicated that they will hook-up to public utilities.
D. ADEQUACY OF FIRE PROTECTION
The applicant has obtained from the St. Lucie County Bureau of Fire Prevention written
confirmation, or has otherwise demonstrated by substantial credible evidence, that water
supply, evacuation facilities, and emergency access are satisfactory to provide adequate fire
protection.
The applicant has obtained, from the St. Lucie County Fire District, written confirmation that
the proposed site plan conceptually meets the minimum access and water supply
requirements for fire protection services at this facility.
E. ADEQUACY OF SCHOOL FACILITIES
The proposed building or use will be served by adequate school facilities.
As this project is a commercial operation, no school facilities will be impacted by this
development.
F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
For developments required to provide an environmental impact report under Section
11.02.09(A)(5), the proposed development will not contravene any applicable provision of
the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, or of Chapter VIII, "Natural Environment
Analysis': of the St. Lucie County Barrier Island Study Analysis of Growth Management
Policy Plan, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (August, 1982).
The proposed conditional use is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural
environment. The proposed lot was infested with exotic plants (Brazilian Pepper and
Maleluca) except for the location of some cabbage palm trees along the south boundary line.
.....
..."
February 1 0, 2004
Page 6
Subject: PSL Moving & Storage Depot
File No.: SPMJ-03-008 and CUMJ-03-003
The applicant indicated that these palm trees were to be preserved as part of the
landscaping along the property boundaries.
*******************************
COMMENTS:
Carlos Munoz-Quintana, PSL Moving & Storage Depot, has applied for a Major Adjustment to an
existing Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit that provides for the a 9,040 square foot second story
addition to the PSL Moving & Storage Depot mini-warehouse facility.
The proposed addition of 9,040 square feet of new storage space at the PSL Moving & Storage
Depot has been determined not to have an undue or adverse effect upon nearby properties. The
subject property is surrounded by commercial uses to the north, south and east and residential uses
to the west. The proposed project is consistent with the existing commercial development patterns
along South US Highway One.
The developer has proposed that the additional square footage be constructed within the existing
facility.
The proposed petition is consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the St. Lucie County
Comprehensive Plan and satisfies the criteria set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development
Code.
Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 04-012, which, if approved, would grant this request for a
Major Adjustment to an existing Minor Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit.
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-012.
If you have any questions, please let us know.
SUBMITTED:
cs
H:/wp/projects/rMunoz-Quinta \Majoradj.104\pslmoving.bccmemo.doc
cc: County Administrator
County Attorney
Planning Manager
Carlos Munoz-Quintana
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
......
..,
RESOLUTION 04-012
FILE NO.: SPMJ-03-008 and CUMJ-03-003
A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL TO A MAJOR
ADJUSTMENT TO AN APPROVED SITE PLAN AND
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR THE PROJECT
KNOWN AS PORT ST. LUCIE MOVING AND STORAGE
DEPOT
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the
testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following
determinations:
1 . Carlos Munoz Quintana, presented a petition for a Major Adjustment to an Existing Site Plan
and Conditional Use Permit for the Project, known as PSL Moving & Storage Depot, that
provides for a 9,040 square foot second story addition at the miniwarehouse and self-
storage facility located at 5801 South US Highway One, in the CG (Commercial General)
Zoning District for the property described in Part B.
2. On March 7, 2000, via Resolution 00-007, the Board of County Commissioners approved a
minor site plan and Conditional Use Permit to allow the construction of a 14,560 square foot
mini-warehouse and self- storage facility to be known as PSL Moving & Storage Depot.
3. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed project
and found it to meet all technical requirements and to be consistent with the future land use
maps of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, subject to the conditions set forth in Part
A of this Resolution.
4. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and
standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County
Comprehensive Plan and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County.
5. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent properties, the
character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters
affecting the public health, safety and general welfare.
6. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project
on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening.
7. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere with
the development and use of neighboring properties, in accordance with applicable district
regulations.
Resolution 04-012
Page 1
File No.: SPMJ-03-008 and CUMJ-03-003
February 17, 2004
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
.....,
....,
8. The proposed project will be served by onsite water and sewer.
9. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the
Community Development Director on February 17, 2004.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
County, Florida:
A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Major
Adjustment to an existing Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit for the project known as
PSL Moving & Storage Depot, is hereby approved as depicted on the site plan drawings
for the project prepared by Paul Welch, dated 11/13/03 and date stamped received by the
St. Lucie County Community Development Director on 11/13/03 for the property described in
Section B.
B. The property on which this Major Adjustment to an Existing Site Plan and Conditional Use
Permit approval is being granted is described as follows:
The south 150 feet of the southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of the northwest
quarter, less the east 47 feet in Section 10, Township 36 south, Range 40 east, St. Lucie
County, Florida.
Less and except the following described parcel:
Start at the southeast corner of the north 100 feet of the south 250 feet of the southeast
quarter of the southeast quarter of the northwest quarter, less the easterly 47 feet, in
Section 10, Township 36 south, range 40 east; thence proceed westerly on a line parallel
to the south line of the said southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of the northwest
quarter, a distance of 63.3 feet to the point or place of beginning; thence continue westerly
on a line parallel to the south line of the said southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of
the northwest quarter, a distance of 26 feet to a point; thence proceed southerly on a line
parallel to the west line of the said southeast quarter of the southeast quarter of the
northwest quarter a distance of 4.55 feet to a point; thence proceed northeasterly 26 feet
more or less, to the point or place of beginning.
(Tax ID Is: 3410-244-0005-000/3).
(Location: 5801 South US Highway One)
C. This Major Adjustment to an Existing Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit shall expire on
February 17, 2005, unless a building permit is issued or an extension is granted in
accordance with Section 11.02.06(B)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code.
Resolution 04-012
Page 2
File No.: SPMJ-03-008 and CUMJ-03-003
February 17, 2004
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
~
~
D. The Major Adjustment to an Existing Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit granted under
this Resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Carlos
Munoz Quintana, including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary
development permits and construction authorizations from the appropriate State and Federal
regulatory authorities, including but not limited to: the United States Army Corps of
Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water
Management District, prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authorizations to
commence development activities on the property described in Part B.
E. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the
Community Development Director on February 17,2004, which certificate shall remain valid
for the period of Site Plan approval. Should the Site Plan approval granted by this resolution
expire or an extension be sought pursuant to Section 11.07 .05(F) of the St. Lucie County
Land Development Code, a new certificate of capacity shall be required.
F. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Section A,
which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development
Director.
After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows:
Chairman Paula Lewis XXX
Vice-Chairman John Bruhn XXX
Commissioner Doug Coward XXX
Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 1 ¡th day of February 2004.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
Chairman
Resolution 04-012
Page 3
File No.: SPMJ-03-008 and CUMJ-03-003
February 17,2004
'-'
1
2
3 ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM
4 AND CORRECTNESS:
5
6
i
10 DEPUTY CLERK COUNTY ATTORNEY
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72 cs:
73 H:\WP\projects\Munoz Quintana\majoradj104\Res.04012.doc
74
75
File No.: SPMJ-03-008 and CUMJ-03-003
February 17, 2004
,..,
Resolution 04-012
Page 4
"~
1
EXHIBIT "A"
CERTIFICATE OF CAPACITY
File No.: SPMJ-03-008 and CUMJ-03-003
February 17, 2004
..."
Resolution 04-012
Page 5
'-'
EXHIBIT "B"
SITE PLAN GRAPHIC
File No.: SPMJ-03-008 and CUMJ-03-003
February 17,2004
ytJI
Resolution 04-012
Page 6
,-".
'WI
"
\
OKEECHOBEE
COUNTY
T 36 S
T 35 S
T 3-4 S
.ø<-
.t<t
I
...
...
...
i
:III
:III
...
...
/ /íŠi<Þ
...
A
,.
'4 I!! ~
,I' (j)
r ~ ()~ 0
') \ \. <.~
C~ ::J 0
I I ..~ t. ;:O~ ~Z CO ;:+
'4
~ C- Qof!2
0
I ! 1:J!· ow
t 'reS (j)1
~c
I~ 00 o 0.
00) ...., CD
W cê5
Qo
V CD
Z ,ðt'l
Z
CANAL C-Z.. 0
I 5>
z
- -- I :III
_'III
~ 111:
.... ....- . I ¡; ...
i I :IJ
..- -=- - <:
m
:IJ
1JIOOIIICIIiI-
.... ...
()
0
c:
z
:<!
:III
::
s::: :III
» 111:
~
Z ...
() .. IIMIII.LIII ~
o
c:
~
:III
... .
'"
...
'-'
..I
~~ .. t: »
-e ~
. J "'tI
¡¡- CD
L r-+
-. ~
ood 0
-i eVI e ::J
::r 0 III ~
0
en ú) 11 18 -
"0 I -------- ,,- ~ "'tI
. 0
~ 0 · ~
CD 0 ~ Cf)
~ OJ N ~ ~ r-+
:::s N en
eft eft ... t r
Qo en r -¡ c
:::s Q.
a. -,¡ · CD
() () -
el '=!-c · ~
CD C ::; ~.
en g:-t
~ -¡ ::J
en --- (Q
C '-- :;0
0 I
0- 0 S(O
_. a. I
CD 0 '--
() ú) Cf)
.-+ r-+
"0 I 0
..,
Sl) 0 Q)
~ 0 (Q
() CD
CD ú) -
0
..,
n>
... ~
~.
U. S. Highway No.1 0
..,
~
c:
en
r-+
""01"'1 3
0::3
-.- CD
3-, N N ::J
N 0 N r-+
OIl ::3 OIl ðI r-+
0 (;)0 ~ () ....ø ~ 0
-'(1) d
0 Q
<- ;:) n>
(1)0 Q
0
(" z 0
0 ::J
III ¥Y 0-
I'l K Canal N.S.L.R. W .M.D. Canal N.S.L.R.D.D. ;::¡:
.11 l¡ i N õ'
i I (õ)
I' i- . QI I! ¡:=I --- - ,....J- ... .. ~ ::J
, 3.NI en ~..,:-..J ~~.j t~J n>
'iL- ! .. C
1"'1 ;:] c
~,I! :J c III
'"\ ... J en
0 s'
'f < Io! ~ "C CD
hi ~ l i tD .. tD
.. 0 II) G'J C~~ "'tI
III ~ V ;:] '" <"
... r a. N CD
;:] III ðI ..,
J ---- - 3
I~~ [iJ ~~J --- .. @
l~J ;::¡:
z - ~~ ...
'w'
,..;
~~ " I: N
0
-¡ Ie ::J
II ::J
r J
-. L
-i ood
-=r 0 II
en W II
"C b -------:B- ~
Sl) (f) ---¡
~ 0 A
CD I
..., 00 N (\) ~ 0
:::J N GI
GI GI t
Ro GI ~-
:::J
Q. -¡
() 0
æ.
CD C
en ~ "1J
(J) 0
C '- ;:+
0-
0--. Cf)
CD 0
() 0 :D G) r-+
r-+ W
"C I G) " r
c
Sl) 0 0
...,
() 0 CD
CD W
s:
0
<.
... :J
CO
U. S. Highway No.1 Qo
Cf)
r-+
iJl""I 0
~
O:J Jl)
--- 0
3-, N N co
~ 0 ~ CD
:J GI G) ~
UI G10 ~
ø -'(1) ~ --a o:::!I
0 ()
<--
(1)0 0
::J
0
1"
JI ~ Z
Wi K Conol N.S. .R.W M 0 Conol N.S.L.R.D.D.
:'1"1/ f
it. ~ ~ . Q I! i=1 GJ ~,::J N ~- ... "" ~
VI l~.J
"I! ! "" c:
!!J I ;:, ::D
III JJ
~
.. :J 3' ~
Iii ~ J l .. CD G'J C~~
CD !=:J I
lit ~ V <" CJ1 N
III Q. ~
---- -
J I~J l"::J ~":J @
... ""
z ~~ ...
~~
--I
:yo
rn W
"0 I
§:O
CD 0
~ ex:>
:J
:J Qo
Q.
~()
CD C
: ~
c C-
O-
(5" 0
$lw
"0 I
~ 0
() 0
CD W
Iii
III ~ ~
il ~
. I -¡¡ t
il '" Ci)
p 'i! - '
ti< 8. J/I
.i1 j'- J.
.¡J :J
. ¡
hi .~ J i
Hi ~ )(
J
Z ..a, ~
:D
š:
N
C!II
C!II
~
C!II
.
¡ ~
T ...
c
.. ..
~ ~ .g 4
tÐ
... 0
::] '"
.. ï
::]
l) T\
0:1
- -+
3'"
o
:I
(;)0
"'m
o
<-+
mO
Canal
'-'"
:D
C
--------
~
011
011
()
š:
u. S.
~
01
~
N.S.L.R. W .M.D.
§ I-,,~I GJ ~,;:J
I/)
~ :D I
; -u-vç I~ v- \~r-o
~ L e-1 L. ':-1 ':-l
---- -
I~ï l~J ......iòJ
_ '\-r -! n-
Highway
(")
Q
:J
Q
z
o
......~
N l~.J
!-=:J
No.1
~
~
..,¡
Conal
.. ... ~
......-
l..:J
"
-¡
.
r
--.
"
II
cr-
.
---¡
.¡-
--¡
()
š:
...,¡
t:
~
J
L
~
18
J
.
t
-¡
*
~
--¡
::0
o
o
a.
[;
::J
a.
C
(J)
CD
e VI e ood
~
o
--t
-0
o
;:+
(J)
.-to
I
I
'--
r
c
()
CD
s:
o
<.
::J
(.Q
Qo
(J)
.-to
o
..,
Q)
(.Q
~ CD
~
¿,
N.S.L.R.D.D.
:IJ
C
...
..
~
~
@
'-"
...¡
~~
-f
~o
en úJ
"'0 b
ro
::+ 0
CD
.., ex>
::J
::J Qo
C-
o 0
æ.
CD C
en ~ "'U
en 0
c:: L ;:¡
0- en
'--.
CD 0 .......
0 úJ
r-t- r
"'0 I c
ro 0 0
..,
() 0 CD
CD úJ
s:
0
I'l
I' ~
U;i K
¡II i ~ t
I!' 3. IÞ!.
'11 <-
~ rl ~ :J
". -<
hi ~ l /'
(It ~ V
J
Z ~-J\ "
."
Qo
en
.......
o
"'""
~
co
CD
- -
_""_. ~_;ø__,. .....AI....r~ +J~
, ~;;:-..
'.,Il:.~.';. '
" ,
~ 'd
'Ø!
. '
... '¡~t~
"~,!
ft·,
.,r,
;-.:':~ "
. .~L."r.' fj it.. '~-." ,. ~ . . ,,>, ...,·~.-'j~i~
£ #> . ~~"''''~~''~'':'_'C~''''''..!'.'_::..::'..:-;:'==': ____ _'~'__'Io.,,' ,_"""_~_~'jW\\·II. ,'i-"ilfJi:,
-[]~~'-I'" i.. ~. .....::1'''' "0"';' "~!',7' -"!t,
j:.'.' ',' . '),.¡ r- - ",'-'0". .' '."~" " ." ..')f;...·'!t~~' >..,.... ~;'"
~;: t. T . . j ...., .~ . . I· .,~ .
L1 .,I.. ',. '.' .... ",," , ,; .' . . '.0:-7'
:.:",~'. ...'...~'~' '. i ;&f, ',...",,"...:06, ..J ~.,'..........,.........(-.'.',.~:OO:..,,"_'.,1..."..1. ,..~',-íã.,",.' ",'\¡7,,,.1~,.~, ;.,t......:.: ,...,..'..."."".'
J':~ ,~. j. . . "-"'" ..-", .~,' .,,~~......:._,,¡; .'.- .J..., .~' "'0' .
. r: ,.'. .:_.._~.. , . -. .' '"í ,-. ".--.'" i, ".' :,~",~\.i'.
.' L~'3"': ~.....t ':]1"" . '," ,~~.. :..' :;;:-;-. ".:~ ~~I' 5· ,.:1....,".:, :">'. '0, "".""'.:,""'."""".'
] ...,. '. . ! .... .......... ' .... "",,".' .. ,-
.' . .' J ".~' #' ~,.,. ,'-"(71 "",.'; . ,~, ,,' , . ' " "'",;t.
...,_.' ,., ..' I " ....* ''!O', . ~. o. .-. .",,"
]. !".:'¡i ......-.....ì.. .." ".'.' \.....J. ""ld:'~7' ~..... .....~... .......'.".. ~..... ".'" ~.' ." '. ...... ..... .... ,;¡¡,.. '~.' . '7 :........'P"'''.'..''..'
t-3: ":..J" ~~,_~'~;,-'" . J.... . "J'\i ...'. ""'~I
],[;~¡. ì);j~" . ~t';..'.··~>-· ;":¡~';~'.' :. ':i:.·..<.L..:;......:~..". . .-, .." '.......'... r'.":'I'.\I,. ,_.~7.;;~'
, ~\ ~.' ..' .~' .. ,."--. ., . ..'lIE~>· ,.. ~
,~., .,..",,);..' .. ,'.:. l' .' .', . ',.:;;.~~',::~.
I ' .'. .~ . ';A' . .,.. "--'" .aoc
3a~,,- \\ ".\.;,,,L.:W..,. ~ .,..,.orJ~, ~ _ ......-.] '<to .-~" ;,... 'tI
~ I ~: !I!rl;;_alrdll~ . t . :ill:íi~ ~ 1;~:I!¡I~i ;~=i~!!; !iil ~ j~i
.: I Þ ~i*-! ! r I"h¡i~ 1 lii~~PJJ:; lai!gi!ill 1=,'1 !riU
~ I ! ¡!L."'I~g:~: i; ~.;J~ i· !St'ti¡"i!ülo e~tl' !~Ii= Ii ~
! p ~-= '. ·"'11w. · J § ~~ ; ·1 :il:"ls~"I~ I ¡i·1:! ~ '! i'1
i ;¡, þ: c If~i1 !ill III I:!~ J ;!!i¡ ,I~, rļ~'I·I¡I 1·I:m~:æ! I 1 Ù .ÆI
~ I" ~I ~~~imlh i I.!! ~Ifi! I. II 11:~kl; ~ IltJi!~1:11i:~ J'I~
~ . -~ p.·t·;¡i;.~II~~1i .1"' " If! \11 '1 ~·¡"ii~.5~ ~ ~&i!lïlr y,:. f 111
~. ¡I ~e '1IU:':ü~!I;~;1 J it h ! ~9~"~ ii -H!P.~l~1 ~1~jil!ll~; I;!I· Ii î~1
~.Ii ii Iii ~,jJu;~iiiiñ! J II I' ¡ItI1!. · ~11_!¡ql i~~'-I:' ,~~ ~ sill-I
". ,'S .t'II~li""'" I II !.I ~1f.~ß I il 43þ&iF~ "i~i= ~'I'~i . '] tl· I
~~ ij ~I ø,,:~!UJ~~~ II ß q ¡ ~~ffü i it .çil!t., .i;Þ.(~íl i,~ i it iiil ~\
¡il ill A~!Ìdd1i.11 ;1 H ! !lr..Ln I ,I 1;~!~t'd!;1 dd9fi~~ II~ hi J:lf d.~
, , i ,. Ii I ~ 1 ! i ! it II;' ¡
î~ ¡ i ªi~s! f !! IGzi!;~ I:!! .. ~ ~ .. . ß
11 I ~! r;J11 ~~ ! Ct· ,.i!"Iü~ I I I'! I Ii II - J":I
IJ I Ii !511J1;:1 iff I ~I:'.~=:I~ . J a t: I :I I a:~
I J ~.. III' :., R! :lJ!I;;!~llal i I: : & ~~..:g a;1 iii
]I ~ . ~ I .1 i&~ ~I i IIlld-llilll I I 1 H ~ Ii '!' t
, II J ! II S ¡j,bla!1 ~ I- iì~III~'!la el== i ~ j I ~û i, I! e! i;
f !, it:· Irl!i~al ~ Ii I ¡11a ~~ I.' II I!i a~ I. '.
II~ ~I .! III :ïllt~a I ,," ~ .~Iiï ~i: J.. i i J I !I~ .~! rail. I.
1 "Iii 'I 111:1! 111ft !!!ii 11 111'~!~¡;;lir~¡i J f i I J II ~ !:I!I- al! !.¡ I 11
il ;1 i' 'PI §~qi Þ ~¡;=:a= =¡iä dp! II!¡ rS il !¡¡ ¡ I~i j ~
BIn! ;1 ¡. P~~i I~ .. ~h;hiii~~ h il II " ~~ !Ii ~ ~ i 1i I ~
¡ft~B!I~~~¡r.Ìlh ~. lIill, Þ.!I - i H ai iiïl!
p;¡ Fll i 1 rl' H II¡~~I ~III ~ ~~11¡~~1~ Ii r, i L HI r i I j I ~ )I!~
I "Ii, ~ .1.. c¡ 3- ~ a~ ! ,.;J I II a ;: I a 1& .. ~ a 1 .i
e Id II! I cg I il. II' ,! 1I15I.ë I~! I ; 1 II i ! '~I Ii! 'iø~ II
'-"
.J
BOARD OF
COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
~=r. ~eJ~IE ~"
~-
COUNTY ""JI,'.
F LOR I D A . ,.:.., '
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
February 2, 2004
In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that PORT ST.
LUCIE MOVING AND STORAGE has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Major Adjustment to an
Existing Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction of an additional 9,040 square foot of
storage space with in the second floor in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for the following
described property:
Location:
5801 South U.S. Highway One.
THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AILABLE UPON REQUEST
The public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on February
17, 2004, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex, 2300
Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at
that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County
Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least 3 days
prior to a scheduled hearing.
County policy discourages communication with individual County Commissioners on any case outside of the
scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or provide written comments for the record.
The proceedings of the County Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any
decision made by the County Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,
he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of
the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn
in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying
during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie
County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-
1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new
owner. Please call (772) 462-1960 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number CUMJ-03-003.
Sincerely,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
H~A- ~~ /~/f.-¿~
Paula Lewis, Chair
JOHN D. ßRUHN, District No 1 . DOUG COWARD, District No, 2 . PAULA A, LEWIS, District No,.3 · FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No, 4 · CLIFF ßARNES, District No.5
County Administrator - Douglas M, Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue · Fart Pierce, FL 34982-5652
Administration: (772) 462-1590 · Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GISITechnical Services: (772) 462-1553
Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 · Fax: (772) 462-1581
Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 · Fax: (772) 462-2132
www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us
'-'"
.,
ST. lUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Perm it is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes
The Following
Conditional Use:
Major Adjustment to existing Conditional Use Permit to allow for the
construction of an additiona/9,040 square foot of storage space within
the second floor.
Regarding Property
Located At:
5801 South U.S. Highway One.
Currently Zoned:
CG (Commercial, General)
Please Return To:
St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development
Planning Division - A TTN: Dawn
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: February 10.2004.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
Address:
Date:
Signed:
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
(FILE NO. CUMJ-03-003 - Port St. Lucie Moving and Storage)
g
M
r:
M
~
~
=
i
....
'-"
..I
Il)I"'- .- 1"'-0 0 (\ (\ 0
(\ I"'- M I"'-M M 00 0
.-0) (\ O)'<t '<t 0)0) 0
0 MI"'- M'<t '<t MM 0
Cõ O)'<t à;¡ Ñc\i NN N(\ Nc\J N'<t (\ (\ 0)
.S! (\ '<t CD COCO COO OCO COCO COo) COCO 0
0) ~~ ~ 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) ~
'<t '<t'<t '<to O'<t '<t'<t '<t'<t '<t'<t
N M MM M MM M(\ (\ M MM MM MM M
~
Š-I -1-1 -I -I -I -I e e -1-1 -I -I -1-1 -I -I
ClJu. u.u. U. u. u. u. ::E ::E u.u. u. u. u.u. u. U.
.c. g Q)
Ig ëã
c: ¡,a Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) "0
Q) ~ Q) ~ ~ ~ I~~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) Q) (¡¡
~ m Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) ~ 0 "0
Q) a: ~ ... ë: ë: ë: en en ë: ë: ë: ë: 1: .~ (¡¡ ::1
Q) j ... j
~ ë: ra 'ª 1: t:: 1: Q) 1: raa. ë:
8 ã3 ~ t:: t:: 1: ::1 .
Ü u: ::1 0 0 0 i:ñ i:ñ 0 0 0 0 ëñu: u: u:
m e ., u. u. u. u. u. u. u.
.~ ~
~ .... .- .- ãi
Q) .... .-
"0 > ! ~ ~ ~ I~ ëã
a: e 'õ
~ ~ ~ .... ~ ~ ~ (¡¡
(!) ð ð en -E .c. ? « ~ I:§ E
.S; ,~ .~ ~
.10: "0 -0 "0 Q) Q) ::) :f :I: 0 :I: :I: E
c: Il) a: a: a: :g '6 .c. "0 0
Q) ~ (\ .c. .c. :i en en en ra en en ü
., ra .... 8 Q) ::) ::) ::) 0 ::) ::)
Q) 0 0 Q) Q) 0 š=
~ en ð c: )( .¡: .¡: a: a: en en en en Õ en en
ë: 0 5 ü: 5 ü
... .- m m M M .- 0) 0) 0 .- .... 0
'C ~ 0 .- 0 M 0 M 0 0 '<t 0) 0) 8 0 0 0
~ 0 .- .- 0 (\ (\ .... l"'- I"'- co co co '<t
(\ a. .- a. Il) en Il) (\ (\ '<t Il) Il) Il) l"'- ll) Il) M
M Ü Ü «
~ a.
~ Q) ::E ::E -:::
« :§ ra ra Q)
È c: c: .c
~ ~ ra ra ra c:
iií ëã ëã ~ .c.
.c. 0
¡. ~ Ü :I: :I: W .,
0
M Ü
J Q) c:
f/ Q) ~ '6
Q) 0
Q ::1 f/
.c. Ü c: c: ::. (¡¡
~ ::1 0 Q) Q) ra -0
a. ra 0 ::1 ::1 E c:
'#- m ::E >- >- « «
~ > I~ «
e -I -I
~ If: ~ « ~ ~ "E "0 g¡
f/ "0 .10: .10: c: ~ Q) f/
0 Q) ëã 0 0 ~ ra E :õ 0
~ .c. E c: ::1 ::1 .c. .c. 0 .c -;::
ë ... - 0 0
Q) ra 0 .c. .c. c: ä: ä: .c. Q) ra
¡. « I- ""') a: ü ü « l- e ü
Q)
:s
f/
ra
Q)
0 .=
.E Q)
0 f/ -:::
::J ~
f/ õ
Q) 0 I~
f/ ð
~ e .~ = f/ Q)
ü ... - ::1 c: e -
~ Q) Q) 0 ~ ra '6 a:
~ ë f/ z '2 2 i8 I::. ... N
a: w Q) Q) Q) 0 6
,g N .c. ëJ ª c: c: iií I!! ~ .10:
i -I en Q) ¡,a Q) Q) ~ ~ c:
en ë3 ::1 .c. ra ::1 ::1 E .s ~ ::1 e
..J z a. Ü m ::E :I: >- >- « m m en u. a. ::E u.
~ ~ :g ~ :g :g § § (\ I§ § ~ 8 M
0 0
8 8 8 .- (\ 8 .- 8 8
0 0 0
8 0 ~ 0) .- .- (\ .... § 8 ~ ~ Il) 0
M M 0 0 § 0 0 0
8 M 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 -0
0 ë ra
.. 8 (\ ~ (\ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .... 0
= 0 0 .... ra a:
8 8 Il) ~ (\ (\ (\ (\ (\ (\ (\ (\ ~ M ë II Q)
- ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I! 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ E
.- M « en
~
ë
š~
~Q¡,
'"
~.~
!š 0
~~
~ ~
! '0
'å3
-..1
c,¡CIJ
:at:
~£~
ð~
~~
ë;¡
îu
~Q¡,
~QC
=g
~ ,
1a
§~
oø..
u~
-s,g
'a!
~~
.'ª
=-';
~~
,
e
~
0
."
~
>
,....
-i
"
>
~
!:
'"
Z
...
C}<b
,,,.
.,
1111
Phone
It) 785·9888 '
If) 785-9933
PARKIIIG: '
16680 SF / 1000 ............ Ii 'SPACES REQUIRED
SPACES PROVIDED ............ 21 'SPACES
HC SPACES .................. 1 HC SPACE
, ,
ÞøL [/IZ IV~W f>!'j.
P n I-II-r tz.e ~'17.)
- .. -.-.-.--..
NOTE: THERE ARE NO DRIVEWAYS OTHER
THAN THOSE SHOWn ON PLAN WITHIN 660 FT
IN BOTH DIRECTIOns FROH SITE.
~
, .
aOUNDA~Y AND TOÞOGRAÞHIC SU~vE:Y ,
THE SOUlH 150 FEn or THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE SOUTI-lEAST OUARTER OF
THE NORTHWEST QUAR,TŒ, LESS THE EAST 47 FEET IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 36
SOU TH, RANGE 40 EAST, S r. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA;
LESS AND EXCEPT THE rolLOWlNG DESCRIBED PARCEL: START AT THE SOUTI-lEAST
CORNER OF THE NORTH 100 FEET OF THE SOUTH 250 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE SOU1HEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER. LESS THE
EASTERL Y 47 FEET, IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH. RANGE 40 EAST; THENCE
PROCEED WESTERLY ON A LINE PARALLEL TO THE :$OUTH LINE OF THE SAID SOUTHEAST
QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER. A DISTANCE OF,
63.3 FEn TO mE POINT OF' PLACE OF BEGINNING;. TI-lENCE CONnNUE WESTERLY ON A
LINE PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER. A DISTANCE OF 26 FEET TO A
POINT; THENCE PROCEED SOU1HERL Y ON A LINE PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF THE
SAID SOUTHEAST QUAR1ER OF IHE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
A OI$T ANCE OF 4.55 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE PROCEED NORTHEASTERLY 26 FEET
MORE OR LESS, TO THE POINT OR PLACE OF BEGINNING.
FOR
PORT ST. LUCIE MOVING AND STORAGE
~ '.
CERTIFlCA liON:
I HEREBY CERTIFY rHA T THE SI<ETCH SHOWN HEREON IS A CORRECT REPRESENTA nON'
OF A SURVEY DONE UNDER MY DIRECTION AND IS lRUE AND CORRECT TO THE BEST OF
MY KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF. NO SEARCH OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS MADE FOR ERRORS
OR OMISSIONS OF SAID DESCRIPTION. EASEMENTS OF RECORD NOT SHOWN UNLESS
FURNISHED. I FURTHER CERTIFY THAT Hns SURVEY MEETS THE MINIMUM TECHNICAL
STANDARDS SET FORTH UNDER RULE 61G17-6 F.A.C. BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF
, SURVEYORS AND MAPPERS.
CHRISTIAN FENEX
PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER
1850 PALM BEACH ROAD, STUART, FL.
P.O. BOX 2533. PALM CITY. FL. 34991
(561)283-2977 (561)283-2979 fox
, .
I
or q
~ ~
, .-.1
c- ()
, .
- {)
ß Q
-
;; >
~I hi
l)¡, 1:~
i
!~:
" ~),
, ,r<J1'
, ..¡
(l"
~, .. ,
:0
, E-I
r.J)
; c..() I
,
,
¡~
" toy
, ,! .,0(-1
, 11-i
!>
)0
, II<--j
j~,
, I
~...:¡
;U)
:P.,
~
..,
..-
ðb
Feb. 17,2004
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
Consider Draft Resolution 04-006 granting approval to tM petition of Reserve Ho es Ltd., for
a Change in Zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 dulacre) Zoning ¡strict to the
PUD (Planned Unit Development) Zoning District and Final Planned Unit evelopment
approval for the project known as Parcel 21 @ The Reserve (Srlarcliff) a 33-lot single-
family residential subdivision. (File No.: RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016)
BACKGROUND:
Reserve Homes, Ltd., has submitted a Final Planned Unit development site plan for Parcel 21
@ the Reserve (a/kIa Briarcliff). The overall Master Plan for the Reserve identified Parcel 21
as a 10.232-acre tract of land that was originally to include 35 residential units, with a net site
density of 3.42 dulacre. Reserve Homes, Ltd is now proposing to complete the development
of this parcel as a 33-lot single-family unit residential development.
Parcel 21 @ the Reserve, is part of the Reserve, a Development of Regional Impact (DR I).
The Reserve DRi is approved for a total of 4,100 dwelling units; four golf courses; 1,600,000
square feet of industrial development; 290,000 square feet of commercial development;
100,000 square feet of office space and 250 hotel/motel rooms. As of this date, approximately
1,124 dwelling units have been permitted for construction, and another 609 units have
received site plan approval but have not yet been built.
The proposed subdivision and Final Development Plan is consistent with the approved DRI,
existing and proposed land uses in the area, and with the previously approved Preliminary
Development Plan for the area known as PUD II @ the Reserve.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-006 approving the petitioner's request for
final Plan Unit Development for a 33-lot single-family residential subdivision to be known as
Parcel 21 @ the Reserve (Briarcliff), subject to the limiting conditions contained therein.
Approved 5-0
RRENCE:
COMMISSION ACTION:
[X] APPROVED
c=J OTHER
D DENIED
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Coordination/ Signatures
County Attorney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
. )?y...
l.. ';¡.
V'
:J Î'i \'
Mgt. & Budget:
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works:
Other:
'-'
TO: County Commission
"wi!
COMMISSION REVIEW: February 17, 2004
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
(Planning Division)
MEMORANDUM
FROM: Community Development Director
DATE: February 10,2004
SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 04-006, approving the request of Reserve Homes,
Ltd., for a change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) to
PUD (Planned Unit Development) and granting Final Planned Unit Development
approval for the project to be known as Parcel 21 @ the Reserve, Briarcliff.
(File No.: RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016)
LOCATION: West side of Legends Drive, south of The Laurels (Parcel
15A) and north of the Enclave (Parcel 17). (Parcel 21 @ the
Reserve, Briarcliff - see attached maps)
EXISTING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
LAND USE DESIGNATION:
PARCEL SIZE:
PROPOSED USE:
SURROUNDING ZONING
SURROUNDING LAND USE:
FIRE/EMS PROTECTION:
AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre)
PUD (Planned Unit Development)
RS (Residential Suburban)
9.76 ± Acres
33-unit single-family residential development (Parcel 21 @
the Reserve, (aIkIa Briarcliff»
PUD (Planned Unit Development) to the north, south, east
and west.
To the north is Parcel15A (the Laurels); to the east is Hole
#6 of the Legacy Golf Course and Parcel 22 of the
Reserve (the Laurels); to the south is Hole #5 of the PGA
#3 (Pete Dye Course) and Parcel 17 (the Enclave); to the
west is the practice area and driving range for the Legacy
Golf Course.
The future land use designation for the surrounding
properties is RS (Residential Suburban).
Port St. Lucie (St. Lucie West) Station #14 is located
approximately 2 miles to the east.
'-'
""
February 10,2004
Page 2
Subject: Parcel 21 @ Reserve, Briarcliff
RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
UTILITY SERVICE:
Water and sewer services to be provided by the Reserve
Utility Corporation.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS:
Right of Way
Adequacy:
N/A
Scheduled Area
Improvements:
N/A
TYPE OF CONCURRENCY
DOCUMENT REQUIRED:
Certificate of Capacity
********************************************
STANDARDS OF REVIEW
AS SETFORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03
ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
In reviewing this application for proposed amendment to the official Zoning Atlas, the Board of
County Commissioners shall consider and make the following determinations:
A. Whether the proposed amendment is in conflict with any applicable portions of
the St. Lucie County Land Development Code;
The proposed amendment is not in conflict with the St. Lucie County Land Development
Code. Parcel21 @ the Reserve is located in the northern portion of the area known as
PUD II at the Reserve. PUD II received its original Preliminary PUD site plan approval in
May 1989. A revised Preliminary Development Plan for PUD II was approved by the
County Commission on August 18, 1989. This revised development plan was for the
purpose of reconfiguring planned golf course number 4, and the surrounding residential
parcels in PUD II. The overall residential development density of PUD II has not
changed.
The overall Master Plan for the Reserve identified Parcel 21 as a 10.23-acre tract of land
approved for a total of 35 single-family residential units, with a net site density of 3.42
du/acre.
The applicant is requesting approval for a 33-unit single-family residential project on 9.76
acres of land with an overall density of 3.39 du/acre.
The required site plan, representing the final development plan for the area known as
Parcel 21 at the Reserve has been determined to be consistent with the development
and design standards of the County's Land Development Code and the Preliminary
Development Plans for The Reserve, a Development of Regional Impact.
'-'
..."
February 10, 2004
Page 3
Subject: Parcel 21 @ Reserve, Sriarcliff
RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
B. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the 51. Lucie
County Comprehensive Plan;
The proposed development plan for the area known as Parcel 21 @ the Reserve,
Briarcliff, is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and policies of the St.
Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie
County. Representative Policies from the County's Comprehensive Plan include:
. Policy 1.1.1.1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes a
maximum density for the RS (Residential Suburban) land use category as 2
du/acre. While the net density of the specific development parcel exceeds this
two (2) unit! acre standard, the overall gross density of The Reserve, a
Development of Regional Impact, is less than two units to the acre.
. Policy 1.1.7.1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan states, ".. .permit and
encourage innovative land use development patterns including Planned Unit
Developments and Mixed Use Developments." The proposed development is
part of the overall PUD II @ the Reserve a Development of Regional Impact,
and, therefore, is consistent with this policy.
The overall plan for the Reserve was determined to be consistent with the
Comprehensive plan through the DRI and PUD review processes. This proposal for
Parcel 21 does not change any conditions that would affect consistency with the
Comprehensive Plan.
C. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment is inconsistent with the
existing and proposed land uses;
To the north is Parcel 15A (the Laurels); to the east is Hole #6 at the Legacy Golf
Course then Parcel 22; to the south is Hole #5 of PGA #3 (Pete Dye Course) then Parcel
17 (the Enclave) and to the west is the practice and driving range of the Legacy Golf
Course.
The submitted Final Development Plan for Parcel 21 @ the Reserve, Briarcliff are
determined to be consistent with the previously approved Preliminary Development Plan
for the area known as PUD II @ the Reserve.
D. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment;
Specific conditions have not changed in the area. This application continues the
Planned Unit Development review process of the Reserve. The proposed development
plan for the Parcel 21 @ the Reserve (aIk/a Briarcliff) is consistent with the approved
Preliminary Development Plans for this area of the project.
\w.
.....,
February 10, 2004
Page 4
Subject: Parcel 21 @ Reserve, Briarcliff
RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
E. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed
amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not
limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage,
schools, solid waste, mass transit and emergency medical facilities.
Water and Sewer services to Parcel 21 @ the Reserve (aIk/a Briarcliff) will be
provided by the Reserve Utility Corporation, a private utility supplier servicing the area
known as the Reserve, a Development of Regional Impact. Since the proposed Final
Development Plan for Parcel 21 @ the Reserve (aIk/a Briarcliff), is a part of the larger
Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve, the issuance of development
permits in this area is regulated by the County's determining compliance or non-
compliance with the transportation requirements of the Final Development Order for the
Reserve DR!. Specific issues related to the status of the overall development and its
transportation obligation, are addressed in the comment section below. Review of the
remaining standards/obligations associated with minimum Level of Service (LOS)
standards for parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit and emergency medical
facilities indicate that this parcel is compliant with all minimum LOS standards.
F. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
significant adverse impacts on the natural environment;
The proposed development is not anticipated to create significant adverse impacts on
the natural environment. The proposed site design for Parcel 21 @ the Reserve (aIk/a
Briarcliff), indicates that .25 acres of the 9.76-acre tract will be set aside as Upland
Preserve and is labeled as such on the parcel site plans. In addition, 3.57 acres of the
site has been setaside as common area and open space. The submitted site plan has
been determined to comply with the applicable environmental protection/mitigation
requirements of the Final Development Order for the Reserve, a Development of
Regional Impact.
G. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would adversely effect
the property values in the area.
It is not anticipated that the Final PUD approval for Parcel 21 @ the Reserve, Briarcliff,
will have any negative impact on the value of this property or on any of the adjacent
properties in this area. The surrounding area is already developed in a manner similar
to what is proposed with this development application.
H. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in orderly
and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of
such patterns.
'-"
'-'
February 10, 2004
Page 5
Subject: Parcel 21 @ Reserve, Briarcliff
RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
This proposed change in zoning will provide for a continued orderly development pattern
for this area.
I. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with public interest, and is
in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code.
The proposed amendment has been determined not to conflict with the public interest
and the St. Lucie County Land Development Code.
********************************************
STANDARDS OF REVIEW
AS SETFORTH IN SECTION 11.02.07
ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
In reviewing this application for proposed Final Planned Unit Development site plan, the Board
of County Commissioners shall consider and make the following determinations:
A. CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN
The proposed building or use is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives,
and standards of this Code, the 51. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and
Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County; and the proposed use complies with all additional
standards imposed on it by the particular provisions of this Code authorizing such use
and any other requirement of the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County.
The proposed amendment is not in conflict with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code.
Parce/21 @ the Reserve is located in the northern portion of the area known as PUD II at the
Reserve. PUD II received its original Preliminary PUD site plan approval in May 1989. A
revised Preliminary Development Plan for PUD II was approved by the County Commission on
August 18, 1989. This revised development plan was for the purpose of reconfiguring planned
golf course number 4, and the surrounding residential parcels in PUD II. The overall residential
development density of PUD II has not changed.
The overall Master Plan for the Reserve identified Parcel 21 as a 10.23-acre tract of land
approved for a total of 35 single-family residential units, with a net site density of 3.42 du/acre.
The applicant is requesting approval for a 33-unit single-family residential project on 9.76 acres
of land with an overall density of 3.39 dulacre.
The required site plan, representing the final development plan for the area known as Parcel 21
at the Reserve has been determined to be consistent with the development and design
standards of the County's Land Development Code and the Preliminary Development Plans for
The Reserve, a Development of Regional Impact.
.-.
...".¡
February 10, 2004
Page 6
Subject: Parcel 21 @ Reserve, Briarcliff
RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
The proposed development plan for the area known as Parcel21 @ the Reserve, Briarcliff, is
consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and policies of the St. Lucie County
Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. Representative
Policies from the County's Comprehensive Plan include:
· Policy 1.1 .1.1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes a maximum
density for the RS (Residential Suburban) land use category as 2 du/acre. While the net
density of the specific development parcel exceeds this two (2) unit! acre standard, the
overall gross density of The Reserve, a Development of Regional Impact, is less than
two units to the acre.
· Policy 1.1.7.1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan states, ".. .permit and
encourage innovative land use development patterns including Planned Unit
Developments and Mixed Use Developments." The proposed development is part of the
overall PUD II @ the Reserve a Development of Regional Impact, and, therefore, is
consistent with this policy.
B. EFFECT ON NEARBY PROPERTIES
1. The proposed building or use will not have an undue adverse effect upon nearby
property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility
facilities, and other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general
welfare.
To the north is Parcel 15A (the Laurels); to the east is Hole #6 at the Legacy Golf
Course then Parcel 22; to the south is Hole #5 of PGA #3 (Pete Dye Course) Golf
Course then Parcel 17 (the Enclave) and to the west is the practice and driving range,
clubhouse and then the Reserve Golf Villas.
The submitted Final Development Plan for Parcel 21 @ the Reserve, Briarcliff, is
determined to be consistent with the previously approved Preliminary Development Plan
for the area known as PUD I' @ the Reserve.
2. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the
proposed building or use on the immediate vicinity through building design, site
design, landscaping, and screening.
The submitted Final Development Plan for Parcel 21 @ the Reserve, Briarcliff, is
determined to be consistent with the previously approved Preliminary Development Plan
for the area known as PUD II @ the Reserve.
3. The proposed building or use will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as
not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in
accordance with applicable district regulations.
\w.
'-"
February 10, 2004
Page 7
Subject: Parcel 21 @ Reserve, Briarcliff
RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
The submitted Final Development Plan for Parcel 21 @ the Reserve, Briarcliff, is
determined to be consistent with the previously approved Preliminary Development Plan
for the area known as PUD II @ the Reserve.
C. ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES
The proposed building or use complies with the standards of Chapter V, Adequate Public
Facilities (St. Lucie County Land Development Code).
Water and Sewer services to Parcel 21 @ the Reserve (aIkIa Briarcliff) will be provided by the
Reserve Utility Corporation, a private utility supplier servicing the area known as the Reserve, a
Development of Regional Impact. Since the proposed Final Development Plan for Parcel 21 @
the Reserve (aIkIa Briarcliff), is a part of the larger Development of Regional Impact known as
The Reserve, the issuance of development permits in this area is regulated by the County's
determining compliance or non-compliance with the transportation requirements of the Final
Development Order for the Reserve DR!. Specific issues related to the status of the overall
development and its transportation obligations are addressed in the comment section below.
Review of the remaining standards/obligations associated with minimum Level of Service (LOS)
standards for parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit and emergency medical
facilities indicate that this parcel is compliant with all minimum LOS standards.
D. ADEQUACY OF FIRE PROTECTION
The applicant has obtained from the St. Lucie County . Fort Pierce Bureau of Fire
Prevention written confirmation, or has otherwise demonstrated by substantial credible
evidence, that water supply, evacuation facilities, and emergency access are satisfactory
to provide adequate fire protection.
The applicant has obtained from the 51. Lucie County Fire District written confirmation
that the proposed site plan conceptually meets the minimum access and water supply
requirements for fire protection services at this facility.
E. ADEQUACY OF SCHOOL FACILITIES
The proposed building or use will be served by adequate school facilities.
Parcel 21 @ the Reserve, Briarcliff, will be served by adequate school facilities. A 33 unit
single-family subdivision is expected to generate 11 (.34 students per unit) new students.
Parcel 21 @ the Reserve, Briarcliff, is located in School Choice Zone 1. Student assignments
from this community will be made consistent with applicable St. Lucie County Board of
Education standards and regulations. The St. Lucie Landings Subdivision will be subject to the
County's Educational Impact Fee Ordinance.
'-'
.....,
February 10, 2004
Page 8
Subject: Parcel 21 @ Reserve, Sriarcliff
RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
For developments required to provide an environmental impact report under Section
11.02.09(A)(5), the proposed development will not contravene any applicable provision of
the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, or of Chapter VIII, "Natural Environment
Analysis", of the St. Lucie County Barrier Island Study Analysis of Growth Management
Policy Plan, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (August, 1982).
The proposed development is not anticipated to create significant adverse impacts on the
natural environment. The proposed site design for Parcel 21 @ the Reserve (aIkIa Briarcliff),
indicates that 0.25 acres of the 9.76-acre tract will be set aside as Upland Preserve and is
labeled as such on the parcel site plans, an additional 3.57 acres of the 9.76-acre tract has
been dedicated as open space and common areas. The submitted site plan has been
determined to comply with the applicable environmental protection/mitigation requirements of
the Final Development Order for the Reserve, a Development of Regional Impact.
*******************************
COMMENTS
Reserve Homes, Ltd., has submitted a Final Planned Unit development site plan for Parcel 21
@ the Reserve (aIkIa Briarcliff). The overall Master Plan for the Reserve identified Parcel 21
as a 10.23-acre tract of land approved for a total of 35 single-family residential units, with a net
site density of 3.42 du/acre. The developer is requesting approval to construct a total of 33
single-family residential units, with a density of 3.39 du/acre.
Parcel 21 @ the Reserve, is part of the Reserve, a Development of Regional Impact (DRI). The
Reserve DRI is approved for a total of 4,100 dwelling units; four golf courses; 1,600,000 square
feet of industrial development; 290,000 square feet of commercial development; 100,000 square
feet of office space and 250 hotel/motel rooms. As of this date, approximately 1,124 dwelling
units have been permitted for construction, and another 609 units have received site plan
approval but have not yet been built. Approximately 95,000 square feet of industrial
development, one 80-unit hotel/motel, and less than 5,000 square feet of commercial
development have been permitted, and site plan approval for an additional 170-unit hotel.
In 1984, as part of the Development of Regional Impact review process, the community
infrastructure needs for the Reserve were reviewed and the type of required improvements
identified. As a result of that review process, the County adopted a Final Development Order,
most recently amended through Resolution 98-100. This Final Development Order identifies
various improvements and conditions of development, which are triggered at different levels of
development within this project. It has been the position of the County that the overall project
developer is the entity responsible for the major construction!environmental protection
obligations identified in this project's Final Development Order. Individual parcel developers are
not held responsible for off-site improvements or other Development Order conditions that are
not directly related to the permitting of the parcel's development activity.
\wi
.....,
February 10,2004
Page 9
Subject: Parcel 21 @ Reserve, Briarcliff
RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
Review of the Final Development Order for the Reserve indicates that at this time several
transportation related conditions are at, or very near, a point of trigger. These include, condition
numbers 76 and 77, more specifically dealing with the obligation of the developers of the
Reserve to maintain Minimum Level of Service standards at the interchange of 1-95 and St.
Lucie West/Reserve Boulevard. In order to address these obligations, as well other specific site
related matters, County staff recommends that the following special conditions be included in
any Final Approval Orders for this Final Planned Unit Development Site Plan review.
1. All development activities in this parcel are subject to the applicable requirements of the
final development order for the Reserve, a Development of Regional Impact, last revised
through Resolution No. 98-100, and as may be amended in the future.
2. Prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy (CO) all tree mitigation
calculations shall be determined and satisfied, and are subject to the approval of the
County's Environmental Resources Division.
3. Prior to issuance of a land-clearing permit, the developer shall clearly delineate all areas
to be preserved and shall institute applicable safeguards to ensure the health and
viability of the protected trees. These safeguards shall be in accordance with the
requirements set forth in the land-clearing permit.
4. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any portion of the site plan described in
this part, (Briarcliff), the developers of this project shall provide, or cause to be provided
to St. Lucie County, a schedule for the widening of the existing bridge over 1-95 (St.
Lucie West/Reserve Boulevard) demonstrating how the obligations under Condition
Number 76 of Resolution 98-100 will be addressed.
Attached for your review is Draft Resolution 04-006. This Resolution, if approved, would grant
final site plan approval to Parcel 21 @ the Reserve for a 33-unit single-family residential
subdivision to be known as Parcel 21 @ the Reserve, Briarcliff, subject to the above
conditions.
Consistent with previous Board direction, notice of this public hearing has been provided to all
property owners within the Reserve.
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-006.
If you have any questions, please let us know.
SUBMITTED:
irector
'-'
......,
February 10, 2004
Page 10
Subject: Parcel 21 @ Reserve, Briarcliff
RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
DJMlcs
H :/wp/projects/Reserve/ParceI231agendalparceI23.djm .memo.doc
cc: County Administrator
County Attorney
Public Works Director
County Engineer
Fire Marshall
Environmental Resources Manager
Greg Boggs, Thomas Lucido & Associates
Scott Morton, Reserve Homes, Ltd.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
\.,-'.
.....,
RESOLUTION 04-006
FILE NO.: RZ-03-026 & PUD.Q3-016
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN
ZONING FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST.
LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND FOR FINAL
DEVELOPMENT PLAN APPROVAL FOR A
PROJECT KNOWN AS PARCEL 21 @ THE
RESERVE, BRIARCLlFF.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the
testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following
determinations:
CHANGE IN ZONING
1. Reserve Homes Ltd.. L.P., presented a petition for a Change in Zoning from AR-
1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 dulacre) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) or
certain property in St. Lucie County, Florida, the purpose of which is to receive
Final Planned Unit Development approval for a 33-unit single-family residential
development parcel at the Reserve.
2. On April 27, 1989, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a
public hearing, of which due public notice was published in the Ft. Pierce News
Tribune and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 15 days prior to
the hearing, and recommended to this Board that the requested change in zoning
from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) to PUD (Planned Unit
Development), be granted.
3. On August 18 1998, after holding a public hearing, of which a notice of such
hearing was published in the Ft. Pierce Tribune and the Port St. Lucie News, and
after notifying by mail all property owners within 500 feet of the subject property,
this Board, through Resolution 98-150, granted approval to the Major Adjustment
petition of Reserve Homes Ltd., L.P., for a Revised Preliminary Planned Unit
Development Site Plan for the project known as PUD II at the Reserve.
4. On February 17, 2004, this Board held a public hearing on the petition of
Reserve Homes Ltd., L.P., after publishing a notice of such hearing in the
Tribune and the Port St. Lucie News and notifying by mail all property owners
within the Reserve Development.
5. The proposed zoning change is consistent with the St. Lucie County
Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of
the St. Lucie County Land Development Code.
File No.: RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-006
Page 1
\w
~
1 SITE PLAN
2
3 6. On May 23, 1989, after holding a public hearing, of which a notice of such
4 hearing was published in the Ft. Pierce Tribune and after notifying by mail all
5 owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, this Board, through
6 Resolution 89-143, granted approval to the petition of Callaway Land and Cattle
7 Company for the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Site Plans for the
8 project to be known as PUD II @ the Reserve.
9
10 7. On August 18, 1998, after holding a public hearing, of which a notice of such
11 hearing was published in the Ft. Pierce Tribune and the Port St. Lucie News, and
12 after notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject
13 property, this Board, through Resolution 98-150, granted approval to the Major
14 Adjustment petition of Reserve Homes Ltd., L.P., for Revised Preliminary
15 Planned Unit Development Site Plans for the project to be known as PUD II @
16 the Reserve.
17
18 8. On February 17, 2004, this Board held a public hearing on the petition of
19 Reserve Homes, Ltd., L. P., for Final Planned Unit Development approval for
20 Parcel 21 @ the Reserve, Briarcliff, after publishing a notice of such hearing in
21 the Ft. Pierce Tribune and Port St. Lucie News and notifying by mail all owners of
22 property within 500 feet of the subject property.
23
24 9. The petitioner, Reserve Homes Ltd., L. P., is now seeking Final Planned Unit
25 Development site plan approval for a portion of the area within PUD II at the
26 Reserve, known as Parcel 21 @ the Reserve, Briarcliff.
27
28 10. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the Final Planned Unit
29 Development site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet all technical
30 requirements and to be consistent with the future land use maps of the St. Lucie
31 County Comprehensive Plan, subject to the conditions set forth in Part C of this
32 Resolution.
33
34 11. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the Final Planned Unit
35 Development site plan for the proposed project and found it to be consistent with
36 the Preliminary Planned Unit Development plans for the area known as PUD II @
37 the Reserve, subject to the conditions set forth in Part C of this Resolution.
38
39 12. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives
40 and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie
41 County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County.
42
43 13. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property,
44 the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities or
45 other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare.
46
47 14. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the
48 proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design,
49 landscaping and screening.
File No.: RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-006
Page 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
\w
..",J
15. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to
interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance
with applicable district regulations.
16. The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services.
17. The applicant has demonstrated that water supply, evacuation facilities and
emergency access are satisfactory to provide adequate fire protection.
18. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution, was
granted by the Community Development Director on February 17, 2004.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
County, Florida:
CHANGE IN ZONING
A. The property on which the change in zoning from AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential
- 1 du/acre) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) is being granted is described
as follows:
DESCRIPTION:
BEING A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS
FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF LOT 11, PARCEL 15-A AT THE RESERVE,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 28, PAGES 18 AND
18A, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 21°19'01"
WEST, A DISTANCE OF 233.81 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING:
THENCE CONTINUE SOUTH 12°48'11" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 90.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH
77°11'49" EAST A DISTNACE OF 57.74 FEET TO THE POINT CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 130.00 FEET; THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
55°46'35" A DISTANCE OF 126.55 FEET TO THE POINT OF TANGENCY; THENCE SOUTH
47°01'36" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 29.08 FEET TO THE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A CURVE
CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 70.00 FEET¡ THENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY, ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
26°52'11", A DISTANCE OF 32.83 FEET TO A POINT ON A NON-TANGENTCURVE CONCAVE
TO THE NORTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 30.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY,
ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 34°02'40", A
DISTANCE OF 17.83 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF LEGENDS DRIVE
AND TO THE POINT OF CUSP OF A NON-TANGENT CURVE, THROUGH WHICH A RADIAL
LINE BEARS SOUTH 56°09'13' EAST, SAID CURVE BEING CONCAVE TO THE EAST,
HAVING A RADIUS OF 110.00 FEET¡ THENCE SOUTHERLY, ALONG SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY
LIEN AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54o:!8'09",
A DISTANCE OF 104.57 FEETL THENCE SOUTH 77°11'49" WEST, DEPARTING SAID RIHGT-
OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF 477.44 FEET¡ THENCE SOUTH 72°01'12" WEST, A
DISTANCE OF 219.83 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 75°35'53" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 495.83
FEET; THENCE NORTH 88°53'04" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 265.83 FEET; THENCE NORTH
01°34'46" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 147.90 FEETL THENCE SOUITH 88°53'35" EAST, A
File No.: RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-006
Page 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14 B.
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22 C.
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
\w
"""'"
DISTANCE OF 262.46 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00°26'49" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 295.39
FEET; THENCE NORTH 39°16'09" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 99.71 FEET; THENCE SOUTH
87°20'25" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 369.75 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 82028'05" EAST, A
DISTANC EOF 105.32 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 80°32'58" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 96.32 FEET;
THENCE NORTH 88°19'26" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 38.60 FEET; THENCE NORTH 77°11'49"
EAST, A DISTANCE OF 241.72 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 9.73 ACRES, MORE OR LESS.
(Location:
West side of Legends Drive, south of The Laurels (Parcel 15A)
and north of the Enclave (Parcel 17)
A copy of this Resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in
Part C, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community
Development Director.
SITE PLAN
Pursuant to Section 11.02.05(B) of the St. Lucie County Land Development
Code, the Final Site Plan for the project to be known as Parcel 21 @ the
Reserve. Briarcliff. be, and the same is hereby, approved as shown on the site
plan drawings for the project prepared by Thomas Lucido & Associates on March
24, 2003, last revised on January 14, 2004, and date stamped received by the
St. Lucie County Community Development Director on January 15, 2004, subject
to the following conditions:
1. All development activities in this parcel are subject to the applicable requirements
of the final development order for the Reserve, a Development of Regional
Impact, last revised through Resolution No. 98-100, and as may be amended in
the future.
2. Prior to the issuance of the final Certificate of Occupancy (CO) all tree mitigation
calculations shall be determined and satisfied, and are subject to the approval of
the County's Environmental Resources Division.
3. Prior to issuance of a land-clearing permit, the developer shall clearly delineate
all areas to be preserved and shall institute applicable safeguards to ensure the
health and viability of the protected trees. These safeguards shall be in
accordance with the requirements set forth in the land-clearing permit.
4. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any portion of the site plan
described in this part, (Briarcliff), the developers of this project shall provide, or
cause to be provided to St. Lucie County, a schedule for the widening of the
existing bridge over 1-95 (St. Lucie WesVReserve Boulevard) demonstrating how
the obligations under Condition Number 76 of Resolution 98-100 will be
addressed.
File No.: RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-006
Page 4
\..¡
..",;
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
C. The property on which this site plan approval is being granted is described in
Part A.
D. The approvals and authorizations granted by this Resolution for the purpose of
obtaining building permits on this property, shall expire on February 17, 2006,
unless the developer has obtained a Final Plat approval for the site
plan/subdivision described in Part C or an extension has been granted in
accordance with Section 11.06.06(B)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development
Code. Unless otherwise addressed through the projects final construction plans,
all primary infrastructure work for this subdivision plat shall be completed no later
than February 17, 2006.
E. The Final Planned Unit Development Site Plan/General Site Plan approval
granted under this Resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that
the petitioner, Reserve Homes Ltd., L.P., including any successors in interest,
shall obtain all necessary development permits and construction authorizations
form the appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities, including but not
limited to; the United Stated Army Corp of Engineers, the Florida Department of
Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District,
prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authorizations to commence
development activities on the property described in Part A.
F. The conditions set forth in Part C are an integral nonseverable part of the site
plan approval granted by this Resolution. If any condition set forth in Section C is
determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the developer
declines to comply voluntarily with that condition, the site plan approval granted
by this resolution shall become null and void.
G. A copy of this Resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in
Part C, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community
Development Director.
After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows:
Chairman Paula Lewis XXX
Vice-Chairman John Bruhn XXX
Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX
Commissioner Doug Coward XXX
File No.: RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-006
Page 5
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
'-'
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 1 ¡th day of February 2004.
ATTEST
Deputy Clerk
Cs
H :\projects\Reserve\Parcel 20\Agenda\Resolution03227
File No.: RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
February 17, 2004
....,
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY
Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND CORRECTNESS
County Attorney
Resolution 04-006
Page 6
'-"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 EXHIBIT 1
9
10
11
12 CERTIFICATE
13 OF
14 CAPACITY
15
File No.: RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
February 17, 2004
....,
Resolution 04-006
Page 7
'-"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 EXHIBIT 2
9
10
11 SITE PLAN
12 GRAPHIC
File No.: RZ-03-026 and PUD-03-016
February 17, 2004
.....,
Resolution 04-006
Page 8
...... z
,.... A
C\J ~!
CD <O~
ü C\J9
~
cr1 0("1) .#j j i
0.... cho
0 I
CD NO ~ .¡~ I
è
CD 0::) ~ '
CfJ 0.... \ C.
CD ,
0:
~
III:
ç
Z
:J
0
Ü
--
1<:
u, CIWCIII ÏIICIiiWIII··'
i
a:
w I - ~ .....
> g
ã: I
w t!
ill ;! I
..
III: I --
~
ëS ..t·, ,.".,
~
s
I
III:
S ~£ J.
s S£ J.
AlNno:::>
III:
w
~
~
:J
o
_ JÍi' ..... Ü
c
........0
0--
........
-lÏíItIO Q) (tj
---.
00
~o
o...-.J
L
.._._"~_~__,__.v·~ __'
.-lIOn,n "
"
""-.
z
w ¡::
ill a:
III: ~
w
-oa/
~'
/
....
....
~/.
~/../
/
III:
s " J.
'\
"
3380H:::>33>10
PGA Village11eserve
Reserve Parcel 21 for a Final
PUD approval for a 33--lot
subdivision
~.Á~~~
GIS ~,,~~
Map prepared January 29, 2004
RZ 03-026
PU 0 03-016
Thlo map haa œ., compiled for general planning and ......... pufpOOØII only, N
While ØY8I'f effort haa œ., made 10 prCNide tho mool current and ......
information pa8IibIe, ~ ¡o not intended for UM Ie . legally binding documert.
PGA Villag6'Reserve
Parcel 21 at the Reserve
Zoning
RZ 03-026
PUD 03-016
~.,L~ &,~
GIS 7' 4:~':Þ.
Map prepared January 29,2004
This map has been compiled ler general planning and - purpaoaa only, N
While fN8fY aIIort has boJen made to prOllido the moat current and acc:uraIa
inlormalion poos bIa. K is not inlondod fer usa 88 a legally binding document
PGA VillagEYReserve
.9:- ~~ a,~
GIS ~";'>~
Map prepared January 29, 2004
Land Use
Parcel 21 at the Reserve
RZ 03-026
PU 0 03-016
ThiS map haI been compiled '0< general planning and reItnnco purpooea only. N
WhIle fNfK'f effort haI been made to prO\lide the moat currw1l and .....ate
information poaaIbIe, ä is not intended fo< UBe as s legally binding document.
'-'
..."
PGA VillagEYReserve
5è~~~'
GIS. -=-<:~_,..-=-
Map prepared January 29,2004
Parcel 21 at the Reserve
RZ 03-026
PUD 03-016
m. map '- been compiled for gonerol pIonnIng end reference - only, N
While """" effort '- been mode to provide 1ho moot current end occur...
information pouibIo, ä ia not intondod for _ u a IagaIy Þò1ding doc:ument,
- --
~ 1 ~. ~i~OIIB5A&iiiiii~ J ~ ~~~I~-~~ , II!-li!~~~; ·äI3i~ð~æ!~~i"~ I~. III
.. ~ ,.- ¡J¡1~aa~Sil~!Ø!' . !!IRa a ie , - , I~·'~ a ~"'.' . I!a J 1
v ~ I í!I!~ÞI.ii""'· ~ Ii a· -ø ·~ir:' la! e~;~¡g t ~i f
~ i '~1r~~ H~§!!! ; I rILl¡¡ ! !S~:iÎilI~ iil.!I;Hr. tt" Iü)
! "t ~.: I. ·~tnl .! I ~ ~ !I:& o,&!!11 I !.~:I;d't ~I ",
· 1" if ~ ..11i1itl BiliS 1:!~ ~ ~!!il 'II i !~1!"11¡ ,. II-!. i I Ii oJ
!2 i ¡-J Ei91.=L~'I~1 II. II r~ I. II J:I¡i~;¡ ~ 'i'~-:'&~ 'i~ J" If!
i . ~ ~ ~ri~:;!~I~. I Û U f LI9!~ i¡ ~~t., LI~ ~¡i . If m
~.II =1" Ii! ~:i!ilJ~'ieiÌli:i¡ ! i IfJ fill :Jlltli. i II !!Llt!!!;II! ~I:I~~II"!I h.i! ~ Jill- !. I
· I.i~;' 511!!1- .... I' I. I 'till, I I ,I 13&!I¡""!1 - I i~i' '11 .' i fj II ~ I
~~ ¡ ~ ~~~~H~1~ I ! n q ¡ 111 n . ~~~1 J~Þ.;ß~ i~ I il liit J~
lit ÎI m i~ddd;i&mÞ 11 ;J H I dldai J ,I li~!~lùi;1 r:a=di~i! If§a Ilf fUr I!ø
-
:. ~ i d.·- II I ~ 11 ¡ i : it It d i
il! J ªr.~ f !, _~'" I p! .. ~:' '0. fl
!IH ~l;rd~lj; !ÍPIæ! ! Ii! = q p ~ il
I J -. 111.1:15 If I :1:!Icail~lal J e! : 6 ~~.!I I a;1 I!
] ~ ill il iii' ~~ S Itlld!;;;II! litH G Ii'S" ~ ij
!f J ! J g S ìl!¡I:~I' is "iW!I~¡'ilÎ;l:: i ~ J J. I sfi! il Ii I :f¡! i;
I !¡ I t):I· ·at&ll~ fi~ I li¡!eP ~ I" ¡ II I!i!~ g I II' "
I~ ~~ 'I i )1 If I i!ILrd I! d' P!Ë;!~'ii~!i .Iii i it- :II fa fI' ~e J ~
~J : - t: ¡J;'~; C;a r I H1 e::~: :~i; ~ 5 t! I,· ~ II !'¡ ¡ ¡éi Ii
i!
,It !i it !I ~ ,¡r.æ I~ J ~. _II lit !I P. 9 m ~ . I :p ilJ
Iî:Un!BP¡16il!~ ~!·t~5Iiì'iL~1 I ~ ~jl~ hI
'-"
....,
,~íf<~~tti.ð)f~{it'A"li_~~.;a:~J..!fIj"--'-W~'
BOARD OF
COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
~ =r. ~ eJ t: I E -" "
~
COUNTY ')~
F LOR I D A :..,
, "
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
~¿/~~~if~AIiIIfW1
February 2, 2004
In accordance with the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that PARCEL 21
@ THE RESERVE - BRIARCLIFF has petitioned St. Lucie County for Final PUD (Planned Unit
Development) approval for a 33-10t subdivision for the following described property:
Location:
West side of Legends Drive, south of The Laurels (ParceI15A) and north of the
Enclave (Parcel 17).
THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
The public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on February
17, 2004, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex, 2300
Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at
that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County
Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least 3 days
prior to a scheduled hearing.
County policy discourages communication with individual County Commissioners on any case outside of the
scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or provide written comments for the record.
The proceedings of the County Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any
decision made by the County Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,
he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of
the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn
in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying
during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie
County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-
1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new
owner. Please call (772) 462-1960 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number PUD-03-0l6.
Sincerely,
}J' L~CIECQUNT~ BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
¡ a"~f... ~Æ'L.--L_<? I ð &~
I
Paula Lewis, Chair
JOHN D, ßP.UHN, District No, 1 . DOUG COWAP.D, District No, 2 . PAULA A. LEWIS, District No, 3 . Ff\ANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No, 4 . CLIFF ßAP.NES, Disrrict No, 5
County Administrator - Douglas M, Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652
Administration: (772) 462-1590 · Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GISlfechnical Services: (772) 462-1553
Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 · Fax: (772) 462-1581
Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 · Fax: (772) 462-2132
www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us
'-'
.....,
o
u-
/'" £!\!
~9~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ -~ ~~ ~ ~: ~~~~~~~ - ~~~ ~ i §~~~
,.~;iig~~~i~~~~~~;~;~;m~!i;~;~~i~~~;~~~~læ~i~¡~~~¡¡~~~~~~~~~~;;!!~§!~
l~ð~uð~~~~~~~~~~~~8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
,oo
~~ ~~i~i~~~~~ii0i~æ~ii~ii~~~i~~~~~i~~~~~~i~ii ii~iii~ii~~iiiiii~i~
z
~ Ii!-
~ ~8 ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~i~~~~J~~~s~~I~~~~ ~~~~~~~~I~~~~~ ~I~I~I~I~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~i
~ø~~ ØØ~øiØ0ØI~Øøljøøøø~øØØ0øØøØ!ØØøøø. ~~~~~~øø0~øø~Ø~"""1 ØØØ0Ø0Ø~Ø~
l~bð~l~ððmð~~ððl~ððl~ðð~ð~ððððð~ðð ððð~~~~~~~~ðððð5ðð~ð ððð !ððððððð~ðð
~~~~~>~~ø~~~~~~~~ø~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~>~~~~~~~~M~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ä0
. ~ ~ ~ è ~ è ~8 è è~ _ è ~~~~~~ è~ è ~
;I~~~è ~ èæ~ðæ.. j ~ o~ ~ j~ u æ~ ~~~~~~ ~ ~~ 1 ~ë~~õ
~1~li~ ~~~~~!~5~j ~ia!i ~~j!aa ~ ~~5!!!!!!iii~¡ ~~5: ~~~~o ~¡~~1 I~~
i"8~~~~~m~æ~I~~~š~ !@¡~~~~l lð~~mð5~~li~~~~~~~~~š~~~íf~l~ššl~j~~~>~~~~~o
IJI~lî~li~~j~£~I~~I,~!jæ~! !uf~~ð~~il~I~IIIIII~II~lil;..~!~~~iJJ!!£~~~~i
~~8~Ð~~~~~~~_æ~~I~~~~~o~~~~~~~~o~~~~~§§§§§§~~~~~~m~ø~~æ~~~æ~~~~æ~~~~
~N~~_~~.~~~~R~~æ~~~~s~~~~~_2_~~~_~~~~______~~~æ~~~~2_~ææM~~~~~~~R~~~
~ u ~ ~ ~ ~ « 2i ~
~ .. II ~ ~~ i¡¡ i ¡il I~~ji i! j~iii '~i ~;i i i i !
~ ! ~_ ~ ~". ~.... 2 ã..~ ~ Æ~8w~ ~8 ~~wwð I~> I~~~ ~ u ð ~
i
~HH~
I
~
~
~
I II I !
aa aa
»»»
a:: .E.E.E.e.e.E
¡J IIi I III ¡ jJJlljjjij~ij
'" ~ d~ ~
U1iH u u~ Æ
~ ~ s
) ! !
I
~
N Ii
1 ¡¡¡
..
I ~ 111'1'
~! II, ïl I II!I I
~~ -gl~~j ~ ~ ~- ~ 3~~~·!
Ii ~i~i¡jijj!:lil~' ¡Jlllil)I!IJ~~¡~jJJI~i¡I¡J¡fjljii~11
-;c
n
~i
If
~
~ 2
~.... ~ .., CIJ::E
~ ~ ". ~~ ~ <~ w
~~I~~~ i~~S]"'~~ J~B~ w~2~ ~ B~~ w
-~I~!~ ~ § t i~ $1~E~~~~2~1~!~
~2~W: 8 >z~õ~ w2< ~~~~~i~i,,~w:l:u'"
~ ; w~c ~.., ~CU=~C~C
~1~~jill~I~~¡ii¡'tlli~~1i~
~~,~>~o~~OCIJ~~~~w>~CIJ~~CIJ~~O
~
~'HUIH.I
ilil_~~~III~il~~!lil~!!~i~~li~li¡i
O~-2 I --- -1- I~ ~ i i I Ii 1--
j~l~ ~ ~~I ~~~¡ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~i~~~
u u nUSiIU;
IHU.
'-'
....."
~~o ~ § ~~~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~NO ;m~ . ~ ~ § ~ S~
~~~;;i~~~ii!~!!;jjj~!jj~~~~8;~~!~iii~ ;1!!~;!j~~~~!i~~~~~j!8~;i~!~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~8~~.~N~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~~~8~~~_~~~~
J~~~~~~~~I~~~_~~~J~~~~~~~~~'~ .~~o~~~~J~JJJJJ~JJJJJJJJ~JJJJJ~zJJJ>zJJJ>z
~~~~~~~~ø~~~~~~~~~O~~~~~~~z~=~~Z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~
~
~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~. ~~~~ ~~ ~_ ~ ~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~~.~~~tt ~~Æ ~tt~
~~J~JJ~J JJJJJJJJ~!~J~3~~-'i::¡i~ ~3£J 3~JJ~~JJ~J3~JJ~J~~JJJJ ~~ ð~JJE
--------~--------_ ---- ~- - ð~ - -~----------------~----- -- ..---
000Ø00ØØ~0Ø0000ØØ~ 0ØØØU~Ø ø 0~Ø ø-øøØWøøøøøøøøøøøø øøøøø øoo øøø
~SSSSSSSStiSSSSSSSSS~SSS~~SB S.¡B2SBSSBSBSBBBSSSBSBBBBIBSB~Blss~~B~BI
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ä~ä~Uäää~Æ~ä ä~~äOä~ää~ä~~~ä~ä~ääää~ää~ä~~~ä%ä~~Zä~ä~
~
M ~ ~
- JI - ~ _ _ Ò 0 Ò
O,Z ~O- ·O~ ~ j CII1 ~ í ·o~Ò~ ~G I>. :5æ!i ¡O'· ·0·
~ _ _ ~. ~ = .!! .. J:! Ii;! ,=
æ 115!G ~ !i c~ ~ ~ _~~~Ò~j 5~UI~~ ~ j¡ ~- I~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~G ~~æ
i:ìfjl¡iø~ ~j;lììl~iliii'I~ljjï~li li~~~¡i~jl¡¡~ji¡ìl;lij¡jl¡~j!i;i'l~
~~~~~~8~ ~~~~~~~!~~~!~~~!~~~58~~æ~C-~~~~~~~O~~æ~¡~æ8~~~~~~~~Sco~CII
~m~~~_~~ ~m~~~m~~~~~~~_~N~~N_~~~~~~~2~ic2~~~i~~~~~_~~~~c~i~N_~¡~~
I
'é
Ii: -'
.!!I UJ
~~ ~
~< -' °l~ -' ~
c ~w ~ Œ < ~ ~ i c~c ø ~ ~ c fi ~W~~
~II Ijii:~ II lil~ I Ii I ~ ~i~~~1 ~ I~J ~IJi' ~IJ I~
<
jiu.
A~
,d
I
I
~ ~
~ g
~j
E
j
! ~ ~Ij~j ~ !O ¡~~¡ I ~ ~
! i ~ÆÆÆ ~ ÆÆ l~~: Æ ~ ~
I UnH
j :
i.. ~ I·~ ~ Ii! I-ª'Ii
i Ii § !" II,,,J Ii .§
d5ù æ",ciiciilii æ", .ij¡"
11
I
! E
i CIICIIO! ~ ~ < ~ "
~~~:_O<~ ~OJI~ ~ §j~ 0 i~~1~II ~UJ~~~E~ ~ ¡¡",~~¡~ <~~ ~o~i xl~o, o~o~
ª~jlll~~~fJ ~il ~~~~i~ð~WK~~~~I~ !~j!~~~iÆ~i~I~li~~f~!'5 ~CII!I~I~ f~ ~¡
¡:¡
~
:.
j
f!¡ ~ I.. ~
"'" ! ~ I!!
H
1:§
!~
-ill
h
Ii ~lllliäRRä fiR i iiiBI Iii 11m iH: H I I HH Ililllll
-
'-"
.....".¡
~
a ~
m > ~ _m_ ~ m ~i ~ ~8 ~~~ i~ ~~~~ 8~~ ~~8~~~8 5 ~
i~~~i!~~!!;i;!;~; ~~I ~1!~;i~!i;~~I;I!!i!I~~~i;;~I~;;;I!ii!~~!~ii8!
ð~~~u~~~~~~~~~~.~ ~~~ ~~~_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<~~~
JI
!b~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~æi ~~~~~i~iiæ~~iii~iii~iiiiiiii~iæiiiiiiiiiii i~i
~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~ ~~j~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~
~j~-S- c-------U-E'"-~----~--------~---,~~-------------------u--- -~-
2 0~ 0 ~ØW00ØØ· 0æ~0 0000~ø0000000000ø110ø0øøø0øøø0ø0øøøøøø øøø 0e0
~ ssgs~jssssSSstS;iSg~SSS~sssssssssssssss~~sssssssssssssssslsss s~s
mo~~~~~>~~~~~~~~~>w~z~~~~æ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~>~
~
ë
ii:z
Ii
(! <
i H~'ej
:¡ z",~~1J
en 0
~ui'~~1L
ii~~H ! ~
~ð ~" ~ ~
~
~
~
...
~
~
'"
I. ~
.!!.5 'i
~~~
uuu
!
~u
h ~
~~ ~
H
§ "æ
~.!!
uu
~
:! ::IE
¡ :r;-cla:
~ ! ~c~w< ~ w~~
.~:~~~~' ~~E~lii~~
~~2~~i~~e.ig ,~~~
N ~~oa:~~~~~~~a: õ~2w
I
:.
t
!
~~
'?~
_GO
lå
t:§
l~
-it!
h
î-
r:1
!š
-i'¡
U-
n
'-'
"""
'"
:t
~
. ~ ~ '" ~ ~ 0 ~-o8 ~ ~< œ ~ œ "'~~ _ _ ~ '" -
!!I!!!!!!~!!i!i!I!!!!!i!~;ii!!~j!!!!!i~~!;~i!;~ijj~isit!!!I!!!i!!!;
I~~~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~;~~~~~~~~~~~ð~~~~~~~~~~~~
. ~
,~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J4~~X~~~~~~~~~>~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O~~O~~~~~~~~~Z~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~
g
~~ ~~II~I ~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~ II~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~1~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~==~=I~~I~I~~-~~~~~~§==~~~u~~~~~~I~æ~~i~~IJ~~~!~I~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~
~¡¡~¡¡¡¡¡¡E¡¡E¡S¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡~¡¡¡¡¡~¡¡¡¡¡¡E~~¡¡~¡¡EE¡¡¡~¡~¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
Iß~~>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~C~~~~~~~~ä~ä~~~X~~~~~~~~ä~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~ä~~
.,
., '" ~ ~ ~~ ð
~ ~ ~! 5~~~ ð ~!~ - I~ð . ; ~~I~~· ~ ~ .
~ 5u ~~~ .~~~ . .u~o uð ~~ ~~ u~~ ~ð ~-~~~ u D:t ~~.u ð.
1~~~5i~~~:t<~üã~~~~¡~~I~~~0 ~j~~S~11~iIJII-' ~!:t~ ~~."sOi~Æ~@k !t~II>~~¡!I> ~¡¡
!I§~ W!!5:gi~~~U8~~hQ.~lí~I~I~IJ:~~O:í~5 ~ic7J h~:t 5oI5L1~ð~~a: '~~-g~~I~~lí~~
!il¡~J:t~li~II~JiiiIJJ¡!~~j!I~~~!jl!!j~ ~Jj~i~j JJ:~~I!!li¡~~~õ!IIJ!!!jJj
Jð~g~~"'--~§8m"'~~~NN~~~œ~~ M~~-o~g~~ðæ"'.jœ~g~N8N~MM- "'~"'§8Na~"'œo~œ~o'"
fææ~~œ~§~~_~~~~Nœ~~æ~~~~2~~~~~~~~æ~æ2~~~~æ~~~~~~~~~~~~~_~§2~~~~~~~~~
!
~ ~~::Ii ~ J:<~ ~~ < ::Ii< ~ w 5 ~-' -'::Ii::li, ~~!! mO
J:R~ ~~~~-'-' I; ~~õB:t~~.. mø..<~ ..i~j~~< j~ R::Ii~I~~ ~i - ~~~
~š~J Æ~I~~~æ ,~~ ~~~gJ!~~ 1~1 ~§~~J~!£â w~ ~~~'i~ ~iJ ~ ~ijl~
J j
11 ~
~ JIB ~ g ~ - ~ J
~ t ~ f ~,~!h i i § ~ ~I~ 5 J! II! ð I~~ ~ I·: !
c:: QJ.; ¡:i~B ~§ ~ I~ D HH¡;;
ð~~~~~~ H~ abbd ~
~ ~ ~~~ .. oooo~
uuuu uu 0
I
!
It (I) Z 0 a: a: Ii :::i W :t: a:: -< -, '"') .:II: ~
ë ~<~ 0< ~iw ~ !~ <i-' oJ:-'81~~J:I~i~E~~ 5 ~ >ë~= ><jO ~
!~~~¡..~~~gSii~ I~~~~ ~i~11~ij~~~~ëj~ I~~~ ~!lsæ~~~t~~~I~
Ñ <~~-'~2~~ba:~ë~~jS0020xxa~c'"'):t:~~(I)óo~s~a: ~õ~_w~c~wdu~~~-,mx
1
..
"")0 .:.:a:~ :!II::O.,
E H ~ ~ ~ el~ E ~ 8
~ §§1!H~:JH~
,.. Z>;>LL.....~~a:....C
j
i ø
~ ~
i! ¡ I ~
'::! ! 8
I~ ~fl~ ~ ~ ~~ I ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ R' ,
!~ öUð
-;!
h
ii ~liliä~1 fi ~fi ~ti~~~~ ¡ ~~I ~ ~~~~~~I~ ii R tiiRi
'-'
"wII
~ ;z
;~- ~~~ ~~§ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~~~ aa ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~~
II 1IIIIjiilll~jil~;~;II~jl;~II~ill;i¡lliil~~II¡;II~ II 11~11~~~ajl
~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~re~~~~~.~~~~~oo~~~~~~8 ~~ø~~~~~~~~~~~
.
æ~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~ð~i~i~~~~ii~iiiii5~i~ii~ ii~iii~ ii ii~i~ii~ii~
.e
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~.~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~J~~~~~ g~~ ~~~.~~~~~~ ~~II ~~
00------------ ___~-~---~I--I--Æ-----§-----i~--~---18j--~-- 0~1~!~g0~
I~..~Š¡¡ŠŠŠŠŠSŠS ššsØŠgŠŠSleŠSiSS š¡ss~issšs~lðSSjSSŠ SS ·šs eeee ~ee
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ð~~~~~~~~~ø~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~!~~ ~~~~ø~~~
lä " w
Ii a: z
ð ~ è Õ ~ "
I è. ~ èèðð~"" I~ ~5 ~ s ~ a:. ~
~~15~~ 11j~ 8~ Iji~~ ~õ ~ è~c~~ ~~ ~~:55~0 5~ Š ~~~~ õ lïð~è j~
ISG¡¡i:Õj"',iias !!€:;O~~íl~jl]~ðÜjU>¡h'~ ~~I~ ji:ii:~~.ø~Q u> II~ ¡;: c ¡¡1~Co;' ¡~ .ii.,a:.c;¡..e ~Ias
~ ~~ ð o~~ ~ :;0 :;o>ð 0 i~ ~ _~I~ ~ ~~·~~b~~ ~$~
)JIIII l~jl~~III~i J¡iIJi)lilfl!!!l ~i!~1 ~~i~I~I~ï!~~I$'!~~~¡I~j
~~;~re~~~~~~~æ~~æ~~~~~~~8a!ð~~~~~§~~~~ ~~~5-~;o~0~~~~$~~.0~~~~~0~~8
SI~~~~~~~__2~~_~I~M~__~æ_~æ~N~~__2~~~ ~___~a:~_~~~~~.~~_~~~R~._~~~~
I.. z '" ~
0 u> ~ o~ ~ '" ~ ~~¡ ~ '"
~jH ~~ ~ ~ '" ~ wI
~I~ Ë ~ ~ -' jii~HHi ~:; ~~~f I!
d ~i ii I -'" ~ !t~ ej i ~
.d! S! J ~.:I ,I
~~ ø-, H~H :! w ::J2!c~ .. ~w w.. ~a:~~ >
j
J '"
1;; ¡;
! II ~ e ~I:;o ~1
nl 9 ~ Ii a: ~
~ JIl J --~ jl Ii ~ s ! S H 8
¡Ii 0 ~u " lmlr p I ~Æt
H~ w i .~ Uh ~ ~
~ .!!~ õ~õ~õ is 88!:!oB w
I z
h
~iNn ~¡¡~ '" ~-'", ¡-,~ ~ ~ø "'''' ~~~o a:.. -'~ i~w -' -, ~~¡
~ ~ o~~ ~ ~oa: 1 ~~~~ ~~~-' ~~-, -'0 ~m~ w~ III
Ã~5igl~I~I~§II~lj~s~jl~~jt~~~B~~~~I~~¡Js 181~li~tJ~JI~~i ha:
~ø~~~, ~ w~o W ~Œ X > 0Œ~ ,~Œ ø~,~,Œ ~ ow øu>
¡:¡
,
.r:
j
G~ I i
I·i..-] ~ ~a: ~I~ S! ~ ~
J~I l~j]]11 IIJI!I~i~
J!
Ii :lill~I~IIIIIII¡I~;
iJJI~i i~Jálili~ISA!!jt5
~
j
I!
~
!
~ ~ 'U
H!dU ~jlÌ1!Ï
ill~IIII-I'lllllliilllll-!illlll
Ilä~ii ~Iiii~äilli~i ~~i
'-"
"-"
-I~I ~~ ~5! ~~I- ~ ~~n ~ :RHHH5!5! n U ~~ - ;~I~II~ ~
IDI ; 1~;lloi;lli~ ' 11~~~~I~~I;~~~~~~;;IIIII~~8~il~i;~!~ ~ ~ ~I~I~M
IR~ ~ ~_~~~2~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~a8
I!~~~~~c~~~oo~~~~~~~~~~~>zz»z>z-'~>z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~J-,JJJJJJJJJJx~
_~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~>~~~ ~o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_~~~~~~~~~~zz
~~ ~~I~~~ ~~~~~ ~R~~~ ~ R~~~jjjtj~~~~~~~~~, ~~~ ~~ j ~i~i~J~~~~
øøløø~øøøJcløøøø~øï00øJJjj0~loo~~~_ 000000000ø000~æ0! 180 ~ ~ ~0l0~!
~~SS~~~SSB SBSSS~S~BBS~~~~S~~B~_~~~i_~BBSSBBBB~BBBæSB!ß~s~g~~g~BSsim
~~~~~~>~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>~~000000~~~~~~~~~ù~~~~~~~Æu~~~~,~,~~~~~
, ~ ---- ð ð ~
ð õG ~ ~~~~ _ c
! a ~c Š ð ~I~ s!···· I! ð J~ ~o! S8~ !
æ~ _ ~ j ÕI¡ ~ __w ~~j8j ~~~ ~ j
IH Ii: Ii: Ii: ø !Ii ° h a; í !II I~~~~~;:; 0 o. ð ðð ð j 8 ~ ~ m j 0 - ~ ~ --
IJ'~~i !1~11~1S¡~iiii!¡¡:~i'i0i0. ~~I~~~~~~11liii~i~íl~i5~il~¡ ~~~~~~~~i¡¡
Illðl~~i! 8æø~~~~~Ó~~~~~~~~~~~5õ~~ð~~~~æ~~~~~æ6~æ~~~¡¡:æ~~~~~~~ð~~~Æ~~~
1~~~§i~~i~~I~~~~~~~~~!!!!~~~~ê~~~~~~~~~iiii~~~~ê~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
'-IX œ-'U
UIU
ø
; ¡J j
z :=Jðz
SiiO o:::¡ > ~ ø
~ J' i J~~ j Ii i~
JJ 8 B 6 ~ w 2~ ~~
Ccn ~ ~ or:(
.. ~!1
:!1 :!!!, ,~~ c "II!
¡; c c 'c ~
~~Hó i !4~
-'
n
I
~ ð; ~ c
wU i L H
J~ ~~jlj !JI j JI ¡i
~
o
w
~
u.læ ~
f! :~glt
!: i
w ~~
~
I in
u. LLLLLL
I
I~~~ ID -' ~
,..~ !! ID ~_.!!!
..II~~ ~"'~¡ st:~~' -' ~~~
... ..H~~ ,~..¡ ~a:=JH Æ ~L
,
l.
I
5~
11
J!
....
Ii
...:1: Z..J
cccc~~~ :::¡~ ~ c ~
!!¡lllj¡t'Ë1~jII~¡II~
~~~~~~~êu.I~~è~_~~~~~~
«~~O;
~uh
c:~..,c<
iI!~1it:
'ëCH~
c!~c~~
ií
~ ~~~~ 888888
~ ~ ~ ~~~~ . " ,
I I il ! ! ¡ ¡Jdll · ,lmmææ~I¡L '. ¡mIH
MM~lj~lj;¡¡li~JI~IDÆ~j~J~~IIIIIJ~J~~~~~~~~~~~~I~~!JI~~~I!jl~ji~~~~~~i
111111111111111~lillllllllll~I~I~IIIIIIIII~111111111111111I1111111111111I1111
'~B~ ä m~~~~m ~~~¡~~J~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ mmm~~~~~~I~~~~~mRRRRRRI~~~~
'-"
.....,;
~ ~ § ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ _œ~~i~ I
~~I~I~¡I;iil~I~;li¡II~~I~il¡iii~li~lllilll;;III¡~~~1118illll~li¡lig
~_~~~~~~~~_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~õ~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~õ!~~~~~~~~~~Ñ
.
J~:~z~2~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~iõ~~~2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ið~~~~~~~~~~i
...
I
..
t
!
¡¡¡~
'-'..
.:.~
i..
1:§
11...
.!i4
-~
i:J:
î~
Æ.!
ii
. ..
ES
H
!
ë
¡¡:
! ...
~ !
ð ~
i!!
I I-
oJ
! .r¡
; !1! ð
~ c c - ~ -., . :Ii ~
IU H P"j f!i ~ ~U~
j .......¡; t! h ! c
I! I! h~<.?~~Æ~H~ ðaÆ c 1ii
......... ...... <.? I-<.?<!!<!! I: I:
'-
"""
-§ ~ 8~ ~ - ~ ~~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~
~iil;~~~~i~~I~iBi§~~~~5;;;;iì~~ì~;;~55~~:~~~~~~ì~~i~iii~!~;~ìi~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~MM~~:g~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~iiiii:~~ii~~~~~i~i~~iiii~~i~ii~~~i~~~iii~~~~~i8i~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ø~~~~~~i~~~~~ill~~ ~~~~~~~~~~!~~~~~~~~~~~~~s~
øøøøøøøøøøøøØØØSØ~aØØØ~ØØøøøø øøøøø~~~øølø~øøøøøøøø~øøø.øøøøøøø.ø8ø
SSSSSSSSSSS~SSS~o~S:!SS~~SSS~SS SSS~S~SSSS~S~SSSSSS~S~SSSS~SSSSS~~S~S
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~O~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ø~o~~~~~~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~c~>~
~
~ L
~ 0<
j ~ hi!~~
S ~1!iiI' ¡Jc:,
~ :::¡:h~d~
~
!I:
~I
:J:
I
CJ
CJ '
:Hi"~)
~:::¡BSJ~
§~
~~
CJw
iu
:J: :J::J:
. !I¡ ~~
~ 1:C.'6 IDf
tv co n:I II co co 1å cog
J: J:J:J:X:1::l:J:
I I~I
:r:x xxx
:!
!
:! 'r!
- ...
e ..
~m~~c x c < < ~
~;~ E~ ~¡ "'C:'''w,wc: EØ j
~~~si~g.~~~~~i~~~~~i~~~
">0~S~C~~'~UO~~~~~~O~O
ø
i!
¡
~
PO
1
..
'-
"""
~~_ ~~o ~~~ ~o ~ g-~om8 ~ 0 § _ ~~-§ ~~ ~ m ~~
~!¡~~III!iil!¡iiii~N~~I~~I!il~~;i;~li!!!~~i!i~i!!i¡li!!;i!!li!;i!~~
~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~_~~~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ª8~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I
J~~~~~~~~i~~~i~~~~~i~~~i~~i~i~i~~i~i~i~~~~~ii~iiiiiii~iiiiiiii~i¡~ii
~~ ~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~~ JJ~~ . ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~§§
~~ 1~~~~§~~~~~~~ÆÆI~~8.~~~OI~~~~I~~~~=~~~~~~~_~~33~~~~3~~3_=3331 ~ææ
øø* 0ØWØ øøØØØ0œ e B_~ø~ë øøøl ØØØ~¥IØØØØ~ øøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøø~
ðð~ ðððð ðððððð~~~ ~ðð~ ðððð ðððð~ðððð~ ððð~ððð~ððððððð~ðððgð ~~
~~m ~~~~ ~~~~~~ø» ~~~õ~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>~z~~i
§
:!
~.. LL
~i~!' h
~ÆH iH
.....
U
o::¡
II: ::Ii
~ ::Ii l
.!ã ~ '!!'
Hw Ó
w
~
~
;
'"
..II: ~
<ll(U) ...J-ß C)~
U d~U
",0 w
!:ê ~
u I
I
~LL
~<C: "'J:«
j:QZ~_-¡¡= "'.. 0 I
- :¡ C04J-IC C
~l;!h5 j!!!'fi
... ..,<:E::Eà:a::C)ww~ 0
~í II:
H
JH h
§i ~~~~~IJ. J~~
~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~...~ ...
..
E
~
t
!
'fJ~ I
"04 :!
!æ 3 i
i~- ~ i
-:!
i:¡:
j'0
d'¡
!a
f¡
B
H
LL C ~
i~~a:~~ i
BUUU~
II:
'"
-' ~ LL 0 '... ,c , LL
ß"=LL ~ ~w¿j~::Ii~!i...W$::Ii~Ë
~~i~~lg !:~~~m~~~~~~~:~~
Õ~wO~~II: ~~"'::Ii~~~~~~~::Ii~~~
iiili¡~ililllii~I~llil¡~
e~~ê. ~~I~~¡~ ~~I_I ~~_~I
=~~~ ~~~i~~~ ~~~~~ ii~~~
'-
"...,J
~~~~~~~ ~~~m ~~ æ; œ ~~ !~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~- ~
~~æ~~~~!~II~;!;jlji~~~~~iR~~;;~~-ij~~iii~!li~;I~!~llj~~~~I~~jlil!~1
~~~~~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8~~~~~~~~~~!~_~~~8~~~~~o~~~~~!~
I
1~~~~~~~~~i~~æ~~~~~~~z~~Õ~:~i~i~ii~ii~ii~iææ~~ææ~i:iiæ~~~ææ~~iææ~i:~
~88~~~8~~~~ ~~~~~~.~~~~ £~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I£~£~£~ £~~~~ ~ .~~ £~.~~ ~
~22~ææ21~=~U==~~-=l~~==~~ ~-=~~=!~~=§~-U~~=~!~~ ~~-==II~l==i~=l~~ =
sss~ssssssss~wsls~ssswsw~sss ss~ ssw~ss w sWs ~' sss§ss ss~s
iiiiiii ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~x~w~~~~~~~~~~l~~~ ~~~>~~x~w~~~ ð~~~~w~~~~~x~
~
!
¡¡:
"
~ h~~Hi ¡
ð H~~WH I
I
~
5
~
!
I
~ HL:;ih
~
~is hi wd;
H~ jj':¡ ð,Bj
i
-'
I
~
!
¡¡:
N
I
..
t
:
I!J~
1.:>.
.:.~
io
i~
,!;oiI
-~
h
jO
d~
!~
~¡
H
e=
ði
§
-
'-'
....,.¡
8 ~~ ~~~ §~~ ~ M~M! ~~N~§~ ~ ~- ~ ~ ~~~ ~~ _NNNN
¡~lli;~~I~~~~~~~ !¡jlji!~¡II!ija¡;ijii~j!~~ji~;~~;~~~!;I~IJI~~li¡ii
~~~~~~~M~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!~~~~~~
. ~
':~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ið~~~~~~~~~~~æ~i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~i~i~i~i~iiæ~i~i~æææi
~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~
-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0~~~x~I~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~æ0~~~~~i~~~~~I~~~~~~~~
~SSSSSS~SSSSSSS~issssss1sss~SSSISSSSSSSSSSSSSßSSSSSS~SsSS~S~æäSSäSS
~~~~~~~,~~~~~~~óù~~~~~~m~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Æ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
...
I
:.
t
Š
!I.i~
1:>04
.:.~
i·
1:"
l~
-¡¡¡
h
n
'¡¡
po
,,¡
<
;:¡¡ ,:! < !
w-' ¡! '" ;:¡¡c -'ia::
~j~i ,! j ~"a:: IH
! ~ ",B
> "'11. ...j (!
!
!
~ '" "
~61J ~ jJJ J-n: 11 H ~
d 3~ H;:¡¡ HI 2 t! :I ~
" .. ~ "
-' ;:¡¡ ;:¡¡ ..J~~2!i! ;:¡¡
J
\w
.....,.¡
--NNNNNN ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ O~ . ~~ ~ ~ 0 ~ M ~~~~ _ 0 ~§
;;iiiiiii~~~~~;il;¡~¡~gi~~;I~~iil~;~¡i~I¡~~i~~il~~~i~~!illi~il¡¡al~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~M~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ð~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~~
,
·~~~iiæiiæ~~~~~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiö~iiii5iiiiiiiiiiiii3æ=
(I
~~~~~~~~~E E ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~f~~
~~~~~~~~~ijjii~~~~~~~~I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~¡i~~~i~!~~~~~~~~~~~~i~,
~~~~~~~~~ð ~>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ð~~~~~~>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>
~
!
Ii:
~U.2
H~
I
~ cr
; " -'; Ii
~ Ii ~j JJ ,Ii co '8
cocoÎ "" ! l i € n ~
'~o.j eli ! .. ..
i!i!i! C! a~j¡ ~ 0 H
~.... 2~2~~O~ ja j
22 2 2
L~ ~"., ~a
'flU ~!¡; 6;c
ÓWI- u.~o æ",
ulU
~
JB ~
H $
22 '"
I
!
!
Ii:
~
ð
...
!
..
j
¡!¡~
~:!
Jæ
1:§
l~
-:c
J~
A~
fi
If
~æ
ð:Ë
cr
\w.
"""
~~;I;!;~~;i~~;ii!!~!;!ii;~!!I!!~;;~i~~~;~il~8i;!j!i!;!!~!!~~!~~!!~!
~~~.~~~~ð~-~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Ð~~~~~~M~~~~_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
·ææ~zæ~ææ~æ~õææææææææææææææææææ~æææõæ~ææiiiææiiii:iiiiæiiiiiii~i~æii
~~~ ~~~~¡~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~ ~~~~~
~~~ ~~~3~~, ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~ ~' ~~~~~~~~~~~3~~~~1~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~B~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~j~~~~~~ij~~~I~~~~~~~~~~4~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~žä~m~~~~~ä~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0~O~~~~c~~~~~~~~~~O~~~~~~~
...
g
...
oS
t
~
"
!!,¡~ f
'7:!' !
~ ~ ~ ~
H jUIUI
-;c
jæ
~~
..-
=...
~r
c!i
:x: :x:
Ii:
f
!
1;
~ ~
H I u~~u~ i ~
..
~
Iii
j~g
i h
- - ~
'-
-.....I
~
.
~~~ i œœœœœœœœœœœ§~~~œ ~! ~ ~ ~ ~ .N~ t~~~~~ œ
!!;;~8~!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~¡I~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!i~~i~~i;;~ê~1~¡i~i~llðllil
~~~~~~~~88888888888~~~~~~~~~~~~~~$~~~~~~~M~~~~~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~
.I
~~~iii~ii»»~~~»»iiii~~ii~i:æ~æ=ii~~ii~ii~iiiiii8:ii iii~iii~iiii
i i
~~~ ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
~~~¡~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~=~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~O~~=~~i~~~~=~~=~~~~~~~
~0~~0 ~~~~E~~E~~~é~~000~00~ 0c~~0 00 0000 000 0000W~00~000Ø000íØ00Ø
EEESE8SE~~~~¡::~~~~~~~EEEEEEEE.¡~ESE' E¡ E¡EE!E¡E~¡EES~iEE~ESE¡¡¡¡~¡EES
~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ø~~~ ~~ø~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O~~~~
!
ë
II
Q. ~
æl~ ~
~h ~ ~
::Ii ,! ..
~ 0( c: w
~ð "'''j -'J:!::Ii§
H... -!h j; ~
ð~:s:' ~wð WCJ ~
~
!
-!
U~
B.. õ!
~ ~ it
~~Q. ~ Q.
J
" '~gc~ë ~
.~ . !!h :
Q. ~ Q.Q.:I:~ ~
h
Q.Q..r.r
a:
;:¡
I
:.
t
!
..
~~
""
.;.~
I..
t:§
!~
~~
h
î~
Æ.!
..~
HI
U
H
~
!
i -;t -;t
~-o( I- ~c
:¡¡~§ ~-.c~
~ .e ~ ,h
~ ¡... ~ a:z
-;t~ ra~ CJc~~J!I
j~ ~~-,clcJ~c
š..'!'..~~~~~ ..ii
U)-;tcm.:lCJa:u.a: Q.;
,-.
..,,¡
~ ~~8~ ! ~~~~ -~!ii~ ~ ~~~ ~ §~ ~~~i?i~ ~ ~
!j!!!!¡¡¡iîîî¡î~!!iììi!!!~i;j!!i~~!!~~~I;î;!!!!!~~I;j;~;ã¡!~i!~!i~!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~-~~M~~O~~O~~~~
I
·~~~~~~~~~~~~~iii~iiii~~iææi~~iæ~~~æææ:iæ~ææ~iiiii~:æi~æi~iæ~æi~ææææ
~1~~~~~~~~jjjjj~~~~~~~~~~~~~t~~1 ~~ ~~~j~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~
~ï~~~=~~~=~~~~~~~~~~~==~~æ~~=~~~~ ~~II~~~~~~~~~~~=I~= ~_~~~I~~~~II~
~i~~~~~~ËË!!!!!~Ë~~Ë~Ë~Ë~~~~~ËËÆ' Ë~s ËË~!~Ë~ËËËËË ~~~!~fËËæ~Ë~~ss~
~~~~~~~~~~~~>~>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~0~~~ ~~~>~~~~~~~~ ~~m~~~~~w~~u~~~~
"-
ë
Ii:
I!~~~:¡¡ -J
0 ¡¡OJ ~j<
I J h~iJ f ,a '!~~
;:¡ " i;:¡..~ :,,13
j
'5
,¡¡
"
~ ;:¡
g oj
j '" HI ~I~.. .e :5! I
'" æ . !!~ UJdU 1
l a: ð U
t! .... ~t! a: a:
¡
I
"-
11
.=I
a;
I
I
"-
.!
...
'~
"
0<",
¡ ¡ ¡
-, WILla::
~ 0 > > 0 >< 00 ~ < ~<~ <
;;:¡a:w...~~ ~E...~~ i~< ~ J<~i ~J~~j~~
SS:5!~c~~œ~ s~c - ~ ~ c ~~e<~ ~ie-~
ø:~;ß~ ~~ !~~~~ ~~8 s , ~~",i~ ~ ~i~
u~~~~ð ~c ~~~~~0~~~~~0~~O~<>~ ð ~~~
;:¡
!
..
t
J
~~
c.¿
.:.~
i..
1:§
l~
-~
h
î::
!~
..-
....,
~i
H
~ï
j
'!5
J
I!!
~
Hd~
'-
""'"
III~IIIIIJ~I;IIIIIIIIIIIIII;IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII;II;I1111111111111
I
a~~~~:~i~~~~oc~~~~~~~~i~~i~ii~ii~~~i~æiocæ~i~~~~~~iiiiiiæiiii~iææææi~i
~~~6~JjjJ~ ~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~.~~~~~.~~~~ ~~~.~~ ~~~~~~ ~. ~~~, ,
---Æ~ilij- ------~-~I'-I-i-------l-~---l----I---l~-~-----~I-'---øøø
sss= ~ i S_SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS~~SSSS~SSSS~BSBSBSBSSS~SSSBBSSBSS~S~~~
~~~~ ~ , ~u~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ðoo
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
ðaäe ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~ :~::~::::::::~:::~t::~::~::t~::~~t:tt::t: ~tt~tt:t~~~~~~
. ~ ~~~~~ ~~~j~~~E~~~·j~~~~~~j~~.~~~~~~~.~..~~~j~~jï~~jj~j.~~~j~~~
!._~E ~~~~. ¡¡¡ ¡¡i¡i¡ ¡ii¡¡i ¡i i~8 8¡i 8 ¡¡i ¡ m¡i ¡ 8¡5 eee
l~i~1 ~~~~~~~~~ i~~~~~~j ~~~~~~ ~~j~~~I~~~j~jj~~~ j~ j~~ ~ j~~l ~~~
c~~æl ~~~~~M~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~zzz
~~!~ ~~~~~!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~m~_ ~~RR~~N~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN~NNNNNNNNNNN___
u
~¡:¡
d
I!!
~
U~
in
-
\w
"'"
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~il~~~----------------------------------
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
..
!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~«~~~~~~~~~~JJJJ~~JJJJJJJJJJJJJ~JJJJJJJJJ
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
!~~~~~ ~~~~~~!!~~~J!~~~ ~ £ £ £IJJIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIJIIIIJJII
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~!j~~j~j~i~~ti¡ltilltti~tltl~I¡¡~li~ti¡~~~t
ÆÆÆÆ!!ÆÆ!!!!!!!!!ÆÆ!!!Æ!! ~ _____~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~o~ðiiiiilllllllllllllllllllllIJIIIIIIIIIII
<c(cccccc<ccc
i ~~~UU~~U]~
:¡¡òòòòòððä:ðàðä:
oC~"HHHHH
:I::r::r::r:I::I::I:::rx:r:r:I:
,....,....,...,....,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...
~~~~~~~~~~~~
~
.~ ,~
oCoCoCoCoCoCoCoCoCoCoCoC¡¡I~~~~ï!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
sssø as .s.sss¡¡mmm00øøøøØØøØØØØØ0000000Øøø00000000øØ
000œ~~00~000F, ~FFä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:
ððððä:ä:ððä:òðà ¡~i~EEEE~EEEE~EE~EEEEEEEEEEEEEEE~EEEE
~~~~~~~~~~~J~~~~~~J~~!!!!~!!!!~!!~!!~~~~~!!~~~!~~~!~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~iii~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
!
!
II
~
!
11
~
~
!
~
..
g
..
,
..
~~
'-'oó
.:.~
I-
1:15
l~
-;c
J~
~~
i;¡
u
H
'-'
."",
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
JiiJJJJJJJJJJJJJjJJJJjJJJJJJJJjJjJjJJJJJJJjjJJjjJjjJJJJJJjJJJJ)Jjj)
i~I~~~j~~~~II~III~jjiij ~~~j~~iilil~~ijjii~~iij~I~~I~I~~~~I~~II¡il
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~r~~~~~~~~~
111111111111111111111I 111111111I111111111I1I111I11111I11I1I111111
~~~~~22~~~2~~~~~~~~~~~~2~~22~~2i~~~~~~~~~22~2~2~~2~~22i~~22~~22~2~~
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSBSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSBBSSS
:0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
! E ~E ~ H ~ ~ ~ ~ H ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~HUH ~UH~ HH HH ~ ~ ~H~ ~ U ~~ ~ ~ ~U H~ ~ H~ HU~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
!
~
I
!
11
.:!
I
!
ë
Ii:
¡:;
1
..
t
!
~~ 1~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~3~~3~~~~~~3~3~~3~3~3~~~~~~~~~~3~3~3~~~33~~~~~~~~33~
ii 1!!I,!,!!!!!!!j,!,!!,,!!!),,!!)!!))))!)!!,!!!!!!!!!)!!!!!JI!I!!!!!'!
J~ 111111111)11))))I)I)))))))ii)))))))))!!i))))))))i)l)i)))i))))i)))))
u
j~
~.i
n
H
'-'
...,.¡
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iii¡iiiii¡i~¡iiii¡j¡jij¡j¡ijiij¡¡iii
I
I~~~~~~æ~~ææ~ææææ~ææ~~~~ææ~~~æ~ææ~~~~æ~~~~æ~iiiiiiiii~iiiii~i~ii~ii~
)))))))))))))]]))]))]]))]])])))]))])]))))])))))))))]))]J)]JJ))))))]
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~I~II~~II~~IIJIIII~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII~I~IJIIIIII11111I1111111
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~22~2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ii2~~22~~i~~~~~~~~i~~i~~~i~~~i2
sssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss
SøøøOOøOOøOOøøøøøøøøøØØØØØØ0000000000000ØØOOØøøØØOOØOOØ000000ØØØ0ØØØOOØ0000ØØØØØOOø
!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~EEEEEEEEEEE€EE~EEEEEEEEEE~EEEEE€EEEEE€€EEEEESEEEEEE~EESEESEEEEEEEEE
è~~~~~~~~~~~&~~&~~~~~~~~~~&~~~~~&~~~~~&&~~~~~&~~~~~~&~~&~~&~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
!
~
I
!
~
I
!
ë
¡¡:
...
~
II:
È
~
~~ !ììììììììiììììiìììiiììììiìììiiìiiiìiiìiìiiiiiìiiiìiiìììiììiiiììiiiii
J~ ~jj)jjjjjJjjjjiijjjjijjjjjjjjijjJjjijiJjjjijjjjjJjiijiiiiiiili)iiii)
II 1~llllillllllllllllllll!IIII~III'i-~III~111-III
!i ~~Ii~~ ~~~ü~~I~~I~~~~~~~il ~ ãi i ã
--
........ ~
-
'-'
.....,¡
~-~--~~-~~-~~~~~~-~-~~-----~-~~~~~----~--~~-~--~~---~~~-~---~-~-~~æ
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~i~~~~~~~~~i~~~i~
JI
a~æ~æi~~æ~iii~iiiiiiiiii~iii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii~iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii
1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIiillill)i)lilliilllllllllilllllllIIIIJIIJJJJI~
~¡i¡~i~~i¡~il~~ii~~¡I~i¡~I~II~ii~II~li~li~l~i~ii~~i~ii~itii~i~i~ii~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~J~IJ~~IIIJIIII~~~I~~I~II~I~J~J~IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIII1IIIIIIIIIIIi
~~~~~i~~~i~~~~~~~~~ii~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~ii~~~~i~~~i~~i~
SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSï
100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000Ø0m
!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~¡
~EE~EEEEE~EEEEEEE~EEE~EE~EE~EE~EEEEE~~EEEEEEEE~~E~~~EEEE~EEEEEEEEE~
C~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ææ~ææ~~æ~~~ææææ~ææææ~~~æ~~~
222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222222~
---------------------------------------------------------------___m
~
ë
It
J
1i
~
!
!
i
N
~
l.
,
..
¡¡¡!
"-ó
.:.~
.0
t:§
l~
-!
L
.."
!¡
"'-
i:!
. ..
e.!
e=
ð:i
'-'
...,¡
"j j
..".
d 'v) -,.;....
.J (1. \XI
d C"
)-
~ \,.,1
r ~ ;{)
~
(.- )
- .j
hv
r
~
ooo~o~~;~ !!!il!!~!!;;~!ì!i~I~;;!!!ii~~~!!!!!!I!I!!;III~~I;I~~~!i!~
~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
'"
I
d:
j
!ß!
':':!
i~
1::15
!~
-~
h
....
SN
r..
!.!
:".i
Ii
§=
~i
æ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ii~iiiii~ii~iiiiii~iiiii~ii~ii~~~iii
!
l
" ::Ii In
~i D.. c: w i
g J! ~~5 ..
Ii c: ~"
IS ~D.. '" ~8J~ ~
H
C:15
~:J:
H j l! Ii fiB uH
~ .. E .~
_:Ii :Ii
" a: a: a: a: a: a: a: a:
I
!
II
~
I
!
ë
¡¡:
C)-'>-
l! 1"'
L:Ii~
"",,::IiO
l!~~
~ ~~£
g
;::
s
Æ
1; en
U~~II
(/)",~~Æ~
'-'
....;
AII!¡li~I;~li~IIIII!!~li!il~I;!~!!I~!!I~!~~~~!!iii~!;!!!;i~!~!~ª~!i!
~~~~~~~~~~~~~O~~~~~~~~~~~~~œ~~~2~~~~~~~~~~~;I~~MMMM~~~~~~~O~~~~~~~~~
.
¡>Z~~~~~~~~Z>-'>Z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ '~~~~~~~>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~OL~~~~
m ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~~O~~~~Z~~~O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Z~~~~ ~~~~
3~~~~~j~~E~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~_~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~!!!;~~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~!!
f-----~--j-~~-------------I!---e--II----~---¡---~~~~-------~----~----
000000~00 0 ~000ØØØ0ØØØØØØ øøø øø øøøØcøøø øøø øøøøøøø=øØWWCWøøø
jððððð~ðð ð~~ððððððððððððð ðððIððEðððð!ðððJððð!!!!¡¡ðððð¡~ðð¡ð~ðððð
~~~~~~r~~Ø~X~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~W~~S~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~
Õ ~ ~
" " ~ "I. I> i "I> ~ ~ _ Õ 0
~ ~uë~I~5 ~ëë~! U§I~ ~I~ ~ ~ G ~ U ~I~= ~ ~ u 5 GI~ë¡1
1~~~j~i~~1 ~ i~~¡~~~~j~! i~ë~~~G~! ~ ~~~~~~~~~¡~~~~IGI~~~I-~~i!)~~UU
!jJil!I~I~j ¡1~J~iii~~I~~li!'~IJliiJJJ¡JIJ:i~I~IJI~~~~~;Jmilª 1~~I~i!I~J~jj
~~i~~~~i~~~~~~~gm~~~~~~i~~~S~i~~I~~~~~~~~~~~m~~~~~~i~~~~I~I!I~I~~~~~~~~
:!
ë
¡¡: ::i w"""" > ~ 0 a:.c:
j 'j",~~iJ I~",~ i -iii~~!iij~i¡ ~iÆ¡ ili ~cili I~ ct~
_ I~ð~_ I~ U uð~l ",~~",:=;~~ ~m~~ "'w~ ~~~"'~ I~ ~~
c ~
c .i Q)~Q)~ ~
;~",iJI CI~¡~ e
B ~ ~ j ~I~ f ~ ~
woð..,! .., "':=;u:=; :=;
!
:!
;
~I ~-II
~ ~'~ ~ ¡¡¡
~ :~~~ r2: .~
'" '"
!!
~~~~~I·JJ~llj ~ili ~il¡~ ~~ I~
r2:~~~~~!~~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~ I~J~! ~
ill)
i
eH ~
2,B!:c ~
CI)( ')(f.ICI).3
~ -~§;
& ên~B!
î
j
· J
~
'"
!
:!
ë ~
¡¡: >o~ ~>~..., ~ WW~~~ a: Qa: ~ ~c~ ø<
a: i~1 ~~~ ~~~~; ~~c~a:WwE c ~...,c ~. ~~1~
~~§IJ~~~~JJ!j~J~ijJJS~'j~~~J~~jJjj!~JJ~~il~~~jl~
a: C:æ CD c :E:E
~~E~~~i!! -'U
"':¡¡d~d~h ~ §~H
¡~...,cð~a:a:~~ Æ rnw~~
..
1
..
t
! î
~~ ! ~
~. :! ~ ~ ~
iæ I~~i! :~I~ j ~i¡gi.IJ~I~I!!~II~illlil~~Þ ~"'J~ ! ~~i~ ~e !I~ie~ ~c~~ g
J! ~ir2:J~~j]I~11 j~~~~!~~~~~~~~~~~j~~J~ j!i~i£Ællli~",~I!ÆI~00000jl!~~
h
Ii Ilillll-lfl,!lllilllllllll:i¡1111111111111111~~IIIII~IIII~~IIIIIIII
5i i ~I~~ ~lilïlll!l¡ a~~~~~~ ~I~~I~I~I~ ~~I~lml~ I ~I~~¡~ ~~I~
........- ~
'-" ....;
~1~~;~~~~~~~~~~i~~i~~~~I;~~;~;~~i~;iiiili!~!~~;~;îl~;~;~~~;~;I~~I;~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O~~~~_~~~~~~~~HHH~~~i~i~8~~~M~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
.
J~~~ij~~~i~i~~i~~~~i~i~i~ii~æiii~~~iiii~iii~ii~iii~ii~iiiiæ~ii~ii~i~
~~~~ ~~~~~.~~~~~~~ ~.~~~~ ~!~~~~~~8~~ .·III~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~II~II~
~~~~ ~~~~~~ ~æ~~33~ ~Æ~~~3Æ~~~~~~~~~·æ ll~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~«~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I~¡a:~~~~~~~~~~~~~BB~lsssss~t~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~%2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~m~O~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~m~~~w~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
:z:~
.~ if
. a:~
::¡
~ ï
:!! :i 2
11
~ ., ~
m'i;p ~ Jill · -~i
J ~ ~ fi fi ~ uh ~
H ;Z E E E E '! H ")(,, ~
,,>:" (/ r,,,,, r/J r/J (/ (/ (/ (/ (/ 0..
0..
o 0
!.., 1!
~i !i
!i ~
a:
nl:d~
r/J( )r/JU)t/J(/)
jj i
::1::1 ::I
(/ (/ (/
~
0..
w o~ xc~ "2 W~(/)~ z,
EOE~~~~~ii 1--I~Uji8~<~~~
i.~~~.~~..¡ ~i~~~~~l~~
s~~~~,~æ(/)r/Jx ~~~~U»~~~õ
..
1
..
ë
~
..
Ie! ~
~~ :!!
j~ 3~ ~ ~i~ ~
i~ ~ ;~~s¡~~~~~~~ ~
!.. a0r/JU)(/)(/)(/)(/)(/)(/)(/)(/)(/)(/)cnt/J
-:c
h
...
.I""
r..
!-,
-".ii
Ii
~I
'-"
...J
~ !~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ - ~ ~~~~ ~~~ ð~~~~~ ~ ~~ ~ i ~
1111~~;~~lilllllll~liil~ iäiil* Iliil:iiiiiilll~~~~ililllllll~llli
i
J ~
.~~~~i~ii~iii~iii~~~i~oci~~~i~i~æi~~i~æðl~~~~~~æii~~ææ~æææææææ~æ~~iæi
~~~~~ ~~;~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~!~~j~ ~~R~~ ~ ~UOUOO~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~
øøøø~§øøløøøøøøøøøæøøœøøløø ø øø¡øølø~~ø§g§~~øøøøø øøøøøøøøøøiøooøø
~~~~f~~~~~~~~~~~~~ð~~~~~~~~i~~~~ð~~~~gl~ððð~ð~~~~~55~~~~~~~~~~õ~~~~
;::
ë
l.
,¡
~
!
!fj~
c..
.:.~
¡..
!~
Ii
t~
~.i
§¡
E;¡
ðl
'"
a:
~o ð -
~ 11 ð ð;,,,! G~
¡¡: i! I'" ¡¡~o iß ¡,¡
h¡¡:"'¡¡: i",§:L~~G~
oq. h ...1~Uj j
,!'1IS,IIO ~~.!I....!I!!S
0. ðm:::.:::f')cn...:>D.CJ.;7'WI-r.n
~8~~-~~~~:!!-8!æ~
:?æ~ii!~~n~ :::h~~~
i
Ë <
~j
~
"
e
i
!
II H~i
UJ(/) en............
g ~
,lIil
>~~~
"-'
....¡
~~ M~ 0 ~ ~- ~ ~œ_I·· ~ ~~~~~ ~~å ~MO å~
~1~;illll;illll¡I~lllllillll~I!III~;i~!liill;III;!liilIliiì~ll!iilii
~~§~_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~_~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~õ~~~~~~~~
.
a~~~:~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i~~~~~~~~~~i~~~i~~ææ~iæi~æiæ~ææiiiæææ~æ~ææ~iæi
~tifi~i~iiiiii"';'!lii;illiii¡ii~ii'~~Jil~I~~iii~~~i~~i~~~~iliiiiiiii
~œ~z~~~~~~~~~~I~lill~~~~~~~~~~w~~~~~œ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
o _ _ 00 =~ s 0 ~
,,, ö "'" 0 ,,, iI~' ~.11 IS ~
Ö O§ ~J oõo ö ~ ~I~~ O~ ~ 0 1~ o~oooo ~ 1- ~ ~~~~ 00 5
~ ~ OJ ~ 0 ~I~~~ ~ ~ Mil ~~- ¡ ¡ill 0 ~~ 0 ~ ~ ¡
:~!o I 5 ~¡~~!! ~~~~w~s~~~~1 I~~~~~ o.¡~ J ! ~.M!O~~~~~~~~ii~~1~ J~~~
! f ~.~ - ~ ~~~~ö ~ ~ ~I~ ~ð1~ ~ ~ j~~~ ~ ~~1~~~~~i~o~ ~~~
! ;e ~II Ë ~ j i I i æ ~!!;§ ~ 8 ~ !'~ìl~iIJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j j ~'J ~ O? j O?! . ! ~ ~ j j) j j ~ j! ~ j j ~ j i j O? j j jl~
28iO?~2-~aœ~~~~0? ~Ni!!~N~~~~I~oœi!!N_x2~_I~~__~N_~M~~N~~~~~~N~~8~~~N~_~~
~- -~2- ~S~~~O œ-~~~ ¥ ~ ð~~~-2ð8 ~ ~ti22 ~---~ -------~ ~ ~~~s~
~~ 2R~~~ ~~~~~~ ~æ_~~ ~ ~ ~.œ_2~~_ ¥ _~~~ ~~~~¥ ~~~~~2~œ M ~~œ~_
!
! ~ ~
¡¡: 2i ¡ x W L&.CJClCJ
~i !! J jll~l~ J~
iiiWO
JiËI
~.f.H
W J:
h -.~ ~
HHI~ ~
< ~ ~ ,~ Z ~ ~c
Mi-'-' ~ ¡W < ~Iï ~Ml~-'! Mm
i~11 ~ ¡ð~ ~~~§i ~II ~~~I~~J~§I~
I
!
;
.:I
~ ~ Iii I~ ~ ~ 1i
~~ !I I IJIIII !j
~¡j~
hh
JsH.
~dh t
Ilil I Illi jii¡~ jJ j ~~~j~>!
< O? ~
I.. ~ I c j i
!! ~ ! ~ .. ..
~c<, ~ 0 Z~0Ø0, ~mX ~C~ 0U ~ & 6 w~ø ~ .~'~~~ 0 < "
i ~~IO ~~Ifc§§§~j¡æ~ ~I~~i iij~~W!i~2~1¡ ~il!I~~III~j~W! ~ ~já~c ~~~liOc
Ñ Æ gõ~!~~!J~~~g~CJÆ~~gl~j~~~o~z~~I~~~~~~I~~~~I~~g Jwww ~Cld~J!~~~~~J
1
..
t
~
"
II< ~ I O?
"" ! f3 ~ ~ ~ ~'5
~~ ; ~ ~ i ø~
I~ .:Ij_i jE i 1i jEJ1. £jjj- ~~~I , ~ ~~ ~
l~ Un
¡:II
U
f~ I~
if ~ ! Ollaai maaiO i a Ii Ilall laaaaaalalll~11 ~a~ "
"""
~ ~- i ~ ~:8§
hé;n~~hi;i
u~~(ljuh¡j u(lj
1..J..J>..J..J..J..JiiI!..Jj..J..J..J
LLLLZIL.I.LI.LLL...r::U....r::u..u..U.
H H~ H ~H
¡¡;¡¡;¡¡¡;¡¡;¡¡;t~¡¡;i¡¡;¡¡;¡¡;
Hïil2H2:¡¡;H2H
as '0 i õ
lit,,¡i ~ If ~ ~ i
11~~:h ~ j ~ as ~ Ii u
!"" ~JI.~gH.¡h
~~¡¡¡ ð¡jj~ð::li ::Ii;;;!
U~~nUh~ª~
~
'é
~ ~ i eli ~ ~ ¡¡ ! ~
::Jð;!jH::J~ ~~.!1ð
J
;¡
~
iii
o j c ij
dUh! H~N
I
~
'é :; (1)'"
N ~ HJU'Hdìhi
I
d:
t
!
[!¡~
~:£
læ
1:15
l~
-:c
h
f~
ð¡
~.i
n
H
J
! J~,~I·~li '" II~
~JlilhHj
~ III II! UlI~~111
~
c-
l~
~~
,~
,j ~
::;
...J
~~. <:,.
. () I.)
--' ~
..) <V "
-1 X <J.
~. ~é
d .
-to
() (J d"'
,..) ß..
ç:
\¿
?
.~
" -
cr..
'wi
~
.~
').::¡.. ...
~~
,...' ~~
'-....J rJ &0
~ (f'
~ -< ~
tJ r\ì
e
-, 3
~ F ~
~~ ,.
--r G \
~~~
...-:
\1-
...)
.-t
(J
j
J
~
Agenda Request
....,;
Item Number: 5· t.
MeetinQ Date: Feb, 17,2004
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
Consider Draft Resolution 04-013, approving the request of Robert Stieg e, Centerline
Homes, for a change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential Single-family - 2 du/acre)
zoning district to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) zoning district and Preliminary and
Final Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval for an 84-unit townhouse project to be
known as Shadow Oaks @ 1()..Mile Creek, for property located at the southwest corner
of South 25th Street and Ten Mile Creek. (File No.: RZ-03-031, PUD-03-020)
BACKGROUND:
Robert Stiegele, Centerline Homes, the developer of Shadow Oaks @ 10-Mile Creek is
requesting a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-family - 2 dulacre)
zoning district to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) Zoning District and Preliminary
and Final PUD approval for the construction of an 84-unit townhouse project on a
42.07-acre parcel of land to be known as Shadow Oaks @ Ten Mile Creek.
On December 2, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners granted a shoreline
variance to allow construction of the onsite roadways within 100 feet of the 300-foot
shoreline setback zone, the construction of units 31-38 and 43-47 within 30 feet of the
existing wetland and construction of two stormwater ponds within 50 feet of the
shoreline.
The proposed Preliminary and Final Development Plan is consistent with the existing and
proposed land uses and development patterns in the area.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
At the January 15, 2004 public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission
forwarded the petition with a recommendation of approval by a vote of 7-1, with one
member absent (Mr. Akins).
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-013 approving the petitioners
request for change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-family - 2 dulacre)
zoning district to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) zoning district and Preliminary
and Final PUD approval for an 84-unit townhouse project to be known as Shadow
Oaks @ 1 O-Mlle Creek, subject to the limiting conditions contained therein.
-
Approved 5-0
CURRENCE:
COMMISSION ACTION:
~ APPROVED
c=J OTHER
D DENIED
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Coordination/ Signatures
County Attorney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
~1k
!/
Mgt. & Budget:
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works:
Other:
~
TO: County Commission
....I
COMMISSION REVIEW: February 17, 2004
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
(Planning Division)
MEMORANDUM
FROM: Community Development Director
DATE: February 10, 2004
SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 04-013, approving the request of Robert Stiegele,
Centerline Homes, for a change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential Single-
family - 2 du/acre) zoning district to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) zoning
district and granting Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development (PUD)
approval for an 84-unit townhouse project to be known as Shadow Oaks @ 10-
Mile Creek, for property located at the southwest corner of South 25th Street and
the Ten Mile Creek. (File No.: RZ-03-031, PUD-03-020)
LOCATION: West side of South 25th street, directly across from
Sweetwater Drive (southwest corner of South 25th Street
and Ten Mile Creek).
EXISTING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
FUTURE LAND USE:
PARCEL SIZE:
PROPOSED USE:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
RS-2 (Residential, Single-family - 2 du/acre)
PUD (Planned Unit Development - Shadow Oaks)
RS (Residential, Suburban)
42.07 acres
84-townhouse unit development (2.0 du/acre)
AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 dulacre) to the north
and south; IH (Industrial Heavy) to the west; RS-3
(Residential, Single-family - 3 du/acre) and RS-2
(Residential, Single-family - 2 du/acre) to the east.
The general use surrounding the property is residential.
The Future Land Use Classification of the surrounding
area is RS (Residential Suburban) to the north and south;
IND (Industrial) to the west and RS (Residential Suburban)
and RU (Residential Urban) to the east.
'-"
....I
February 10, 2004
Page 2
Subject: Shadow Oaks @ 1 O-Mile Creek
RZ-03-031 & PUD-03-020
fiRE/EMS PROTECTION:
Station #1 (6400 Rhode Island Avenue). is located
approximately three miles to the north.
UTILITY SERVICE:
The Ft. Pierce Utility Authority will provide Water and
Sewer Services. There are existing Service lines adjacent
to the subject property.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
RIGHT-Of-WAY
ADEQUACY:
South 25th Street has a right-of-way width of 120 feet.
Based upon the current designs for the planned expansion
of this roadway, no additional right-of-way is needed.
SCHEDULED
IMPROVEMENTS:
See below
TYPE Of CONCURRENCY
DOCUMENT REQUIRED:
Certificate of Capacity.
**********************
STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH
IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall
consider the following determinations:
1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the
St. Lucie County Land Development Code;
The applicant is requesting a change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential Single-family
- 2 du/acre) zoning district to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) zoning district. As
required under the PUD application process, the applicant is also seeking simultaneous
approval of the Preliminary and Final PUD site plans for the entire 42.07-acre tract of
land.
The proposed change in zoning/site plan has been determined to not be in conflict with
any applicable provision of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code.
'-"
.....1
February 10, 2004
Page 3
Subject: Shadow Oaks @ 1 O-Mile Creek
RZ-03-031 & PUD-03-020
The overall design of the proposed project has taken into account the required shoreline
setbacks from the tributaries to the North Fork of the St. Lucie River. However, due to
the configuration of the parcel, it has been necessary for the board to consider, and
grant, partial relief from these minimum shoreline setbacks in order to permit access into
the property itself. On December 2,2003, the Board of County Commissioners granted
a shoreline variance to allow construction of a portion the projects roadway within the
otherwise required 300-foot shoreline setback zone and to allow the construction of
residential units 31-38 and 43-47 within 30 feet of the existing freshwater
wetland/hammock areas in the central part of the site along with authorizing the
construction of portions of two on-site stormwater ponds within 50 feet of the shoreline.
According to Section 7.01.01 of the LDC, the purpose of the Planned Unit Development
(PUD) zoning district is to achieve residential land of superior quality through the
encouragement of flexibility and creativity in design options that:
A. Permit creative approaches to the development of residential land reflecting
changes in the technology of land development;
B. Allow for the efficient use of land, which can result in smaller networks of utilities
and streets and thereby lower development costs;
C. Allow design options that encourage an environment of stable character,
compatible with surrounding land uses; and,
D. Permit the enhancement of neighborhoods through the preservation of natural
features, the provision of underground utilities and the provision of recreation and open
space.
In response to items above, the proposed design for this residential project includes the
clustering of the units around a central roadway system. Within the overall design, there
are a series of buildings containing 4-units; 5-units; and 6-units, for a total of 84
residential units. In addition, the applicant's proposed design has incorporated the
existing land features in order to preserve environmentally sensitive area onsite.
Access to the site is via South 2Sh Street, with its connection point located immediately
across from the existing Sweetwater Drive. The proposed project has included the
necessary roadway improvements being proposed for construction along South 2Sh
Street. The Fort Pierce Utility Authority will be providing water and sewer services to the
project.
The proposed design of this project has taken into consideration the existing conditions
on the site, by placing most of the improvements within the areas of the site already
impacted by development and use as a grove. The project is located adjacent to 10-Mile
Creek and contains a 12.83-acre wetland along the northwestern corner of the project.
'"
""
February 10, 2004
Page 4
Subject: Shadow Oaks @ 10-Mile Creek
RZ-03-031 & PUD-03-020
The site design incorporates the preservation of the entire 12.83-acre wetland. In
addition, the site design incorporates a number of existing trees within the open space
areas. As part of the site plan process, the developers and staff worked together to
redesign the site to preserve onsite vegetation within its natural state.
As part of the site review and shoreline variance approval, staff requested and the
applicant has agreed to dedicate a 50 foot strip of land adjacent to the northern property
line to the county for use as part of the County's green ways and trail system.
2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie
County Comprehensive Plan;
The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed PUD (Planned Unit Development)
amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan.
Representative Policies include:
Policy 1.1.1.1 allows for residential development at a maximum of 2 du/acre, in those
areas designated with a RS (Residential Suburban) Future Land Use Designation
Policy 1.1.4.2 requires that new development be designed and planned in a manner,
which does not place an unanticipated economic burden upon the services and facilities
of St. Lucie County.
Policy 1.1.4.3 requires that the County encourage the use of cluster housing and
planned unit developments to conserve open space and environmentally sensitive
areas.
Objective 8.1.4.6 requires that wetlands be protected and maintained through reduced
paving, conservation easements, cluster site planning and the micrositing of buildings
The proposed project has been designed with a density of 2 dulacre, which is consistent
with the existing Future Land Use designation. The subject property is located in the
Fort Pierce Utility Authorities designated service area. FPUA has provided the County
with verification that sufficient capacity is available to meet the demands of the project.
Of the total 42.07-acre land tract, the project design includes 36.12 acres (85.9%) as
open space, which exceeds the req'uired 35% or 14.7 acres of open space for this site.
The proposed project contains a 12.83-acre wetland that is being preserved onsite. In
addition, through micro-siting the buildings, the developer has preserved a number of
the remaining native trees onsite.
As depicted on the site plan and a included as a condition of approval of the shoreline
variance, the developers are required to dedicate to the County a 50-foot wide linear
strip of land along the northern property line, which is to be incorporated within the
'-"
....,,¡
February 10, 2004
Page 5
Subject: Shadow Oaks @ 10-Mile Creek
RZ-03-031 & PUD-03-020
County green ways and trail system to be located along the North fork of the St. Lucie
River.
The proposed site design was created in a manner that minimizes impacts to the
existing 12.83-acre wetland. In actuality, the site design doe not impact the wetland in
any manner. The buildings were microsited in a manner that not only protects the
wetland but also protects existing native vegetation on the site.
3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the
existing and proposed land uses;
This proposed change in zoning and the accompanying Planned Unit Development site
plan are both consistent with the existing and proposed uses within the area. The
property located to the north of the subject property is residential; to the east is the
Sweetwater residential subdivision; to the west are industrial lands and to the south is
vacant residentially zoned property. The proposed multi-family residential project will
provide a reasonable transitional use from the lower intensity residential development to
the north, south and east and the higher intensity industrial uses to the west.
4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment;
The petitioned property has been the subject of two prior development applications that
were approved by the County, but never constructed. The current development plans
for the petitioned site is consistent with the development densities in the area, and
represents what may be considered as the least impactive footprint of development on
the property possible in that all of the primary environmental resources have been
protected in place, along with the dedication of a 50 wide public recreation strip along
the 10 Mile Creek shoreline edge.
5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed
amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not
limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage,
schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities;
The applicant is proposing an 84-unit townhouse development resulting in minimal
demands on public facilities.
The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has scheduled roadway
improvements (adding lanes) for South 25th Street from Midway Road to Edwards Road,
in fiscal year 2004/2005.
South 25th Street, north of the subject site is a 2-lane facility with a level-of-service
capacity of 15,600 daily trips. The current AADT for this roadway segment is 13,700
'-'
...,.¡
February 10, 2004
Page 6
Subject: Shadow Oaks @ 10-Mile Creek
RZ-03-031 & PUD-03-020
trips. There is an additional 3,078-committed trips. Therefore, the total trips for this
roadway segment is 16,778 exceeding the minimum LOS standard by 1,178 trips.
However, since the roadway is set to be widened in FY 2004/05, the increased LOS-
capacity (33,200 aadt) will support the proposed development project.
The applicant's Traffic Impact Analysis indicates that the roadway links surrounding the
site, with the scheduled South 25th Street roadway widening improvements, are
projected to operate at acceptable levels-of-service with the addition of the proposed
development traffic. Using the formula found in the ITE, Trip Generation Manual, for
Residential Townhouse units, the proposed project is expected to produce 561 daily
trips. During the Peak AM Hours the project is expected to create 37 trips (6 - inside the
development and 31-outside the development). During the Peak PM Hours the project
is expected to produce 45 additional trips on the roadway network (30 in and 15 out).
70% of the trips produced by this project are expected to ~o north on South 25th Street
and 30% of the trips are expected to go south on South 25t Street.
The proposed project will be serviced water and sewer by the FPUA. The applicant has
received confirmation that sufficient capacity is available to meet the demands of the
proposed project.
6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
significant adverse impacts on the natural environment;
The ± 42-acre site contains one large wetland community of good quality and an upland
area that is heavily overgrown with exotic plant material that has been cleared. Within
this site four plant communities were identified: Bottomland Hardwoods, Hammock,
Brazilian Pepper and Herbaceous Upland.
The Bottomland Hardwood forest stands in the north central to west portion of the site,
encompassing 12.83 acres. The canopy consists of a mixture of hardwoods such as
water hickory (Carya aquatica) and red maple (Acer rubrum) and associated species
such as cypress (Taxodium sp.) The understory consists of several ferns such as
swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum) and leather fern (Acrostichum danaeifolium) and
other associated species such as green arum (Peltandra virginica). Very few exotic
plants have invaded the area. There was standing water observed in the lowest areas a
stream meanders through the area connecting it to the river. The underlying soil type is
Fluvaquents. This soil type is typically found on floodplains of rivers and streams and is
highly variable, ranging from sand to clay. The applicant's have preserved the entire
12.83 within the site design.
To the south of the bottomland hardwood forest lays the hammock area, about 15.23
acres in size. This area consists of numerous live oak (Quercus virginiana) trees with a
heavy Brazilian pepper invasion, which has recently been cleared. The understory
vegetation was lacking due to the dense brush growth of the pepper. The area is
several feet higher than the adjacent wetland. The soil types found included Ankona
sand, Nettles sand and Susanna sand. These three types of soils are typically found on
broad flatwoods. Each also has black sand near the surface to varying depths with the
Ankona having the shallowest layer of black sand and Susanna having the deepest.
Each also has grades to lighter shades of gray at deeper depths.
The eastern section and the extreme northwest corner of the site consisted of a dense
~
"'"
February 10, 2004
Page 7
Subject: Shadow Oaks @ 1 O-Mile Creek
RZ-03-031 & PUD-03-020
Brazilian pepper forest with little to no understory, about 9.45 acres in size. This area
lies at the same elevation as the hammock. Nettles sand and Wabasso sand are
present in the eastern area. Wabasso sand is similar to the other sands with a slightly
deeper layer of black sand at the surface. Since the northwest corner area is adjacent to
the creek, it lies within the Fluvaquents soil type. Actual soils, however, more closely
resemble those present in the other Brazilian pepper area.
Between the hammock and the Brazilizian pepper and south of the pepper lie disturbed
herbaceous upland areas. The southern portion, approximately 2.04 acres in size, is a
remnant citrus grove that has been cleared and the portion in the center of the site,
approximately 1.79 acres in size, contains a variety of upland grasses and scrubby
species. These areas have been cleared with the exception of the gopher tortoise
burrow area where orange construction fencing was erected to prevent encroachment.
Nettles sand occurs in this area.
The gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), a species of special concern, was found
and documented to be using the central upland herbaceous area for burrowing. There
were six active gopher tortoise burrows and two inactive gopher tortoise burrows found
on the site. In the site design, 2.03 acres located in the northwestern corner of the site
has been preserved for habitat for the gopher tortoise population. The FWCC requires
that 1.7 acres be setaside for the gopher tortoise population found on this site, the
applicant's design exceeded the minimum required for gopher tortoise habitat setaside.
Section 7.01.03(1) of the Land Development Code requires that a minimum of 35% of the
entire site be preserved as open space. The site is 42.07-acres in size, which equates
to 14.07 -acres of the site. The applicant's design incorporates 36.12-acres of the 42.07-
acres as open space, this equates to 85.9% of the site. This open space includes the
stormwater features, wetland and wetland buffer areas, large areas of trees and
recreational areas.
7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an
orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative
affects of such patterns;
The subject site is currently designated with a RS (Residential Suburban) Future Land
Use Map designation, which permits residential development up to 2 du/acre. The
applicant's request is for an 84-unit multi-family development provides for a project
density of 2 du/acre. The property to the north, south and east are designated for
residential development. To the west is heavy industrial zoned property. The proposed
low-density multi-family residential development will provide a reasonable transition of
uses from the lower-density residential to the north, south and east and the higher
intensity industrial development to the west. With the development of this Planned Unit
Development (PUD) the general character of the surrounding properties will not change
from the existing residential character.
8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest,
and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code;
~
'WI
February 10, 2004
Page 8
Subject: Shadow Oaks @ 10-Mile Creek
RZ-03-031 & PUD-03-020
The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in
harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code.
***************************
The petitioner, Robert Stiegele of Centerline Homes, has requested a change in zoning from the
RS-2 (Residential, Single-family - 2 du/acre) zoning district to the PUD (Planned Unit
Development - Shadow Oaks) zoning district and Preliminary and Final PUD approval for an
84-unit townhouse development on a 42 acre parcel of land located at the southwest corner of
the South 25th Street and the Ten Mile Creek.
Staff has determined that the proposed townhouse project is consistent with the standards of
review as set forth in Section 11.02.10 and Section 11.07.00 of the St. Lucie County Land
Development Code.
At the January 15, 2004, Planning and Zoning Commission public hearing, the Board
recommended approval by a 7-1 vote (with one member absent), subject to staff's
recommended conditions. During the public hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission
raised concerns over potential for the flooding of the subject property. In order to ensure that all
issues raised with regards to potential flooding of the property, Staff reviewed the site design in
correlation with the requirements of Section 6.05.00, Flood Damage Prevention, of the St. Lucie
County Land Development Code. The applicant's proposed site design:
· has located all of the buildings outside of the floodway;
· will be required to provide verification that the units and materials are protected against
any flooding potential;
· has taken into consideration the presence of the floodplains, stream channels and
natural protective barriers through onsite preservation of existing natural areas;
· has been done in a manner which will not divert or enhance floodwaters to properties
further downstream,
·
Staff has determined that the proposed development satisfies all criteria set forth in Section
6.05.00 of the Land Development Code.
Attached for your review is Draft Resolution 04-013. This Resolution, if approved, would grant a
change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-family - 2 du/acre) zoning district to the
PUD (Planned Unit Development - Shadow Oaks) zoning district and grant Preliminary and
Final PUD approval for a 84-townhouse development for the project to be known as Shadow
Oaks @ 10-Mile Creek, subject to the following limited conditions.
1. No other restricted use or encroachment into the 300-foot shoreline setback may be
permitted, except as depicted on the site plan and approved under Resolution 03-1841,
~
'--'
February 10, 2004
Page 9
Subject: Shadow Oaks @ 10-Mile Creek
RZ-03-031 & PUD-03-020
shoreline variance application, unless varied in accord with the applicable standards of
the County's Land Development Code.
2. As part of the submission of any construction plans for any activity in the area of
authorized encroachment, full and complete mitigation/restoration plans shall be
required demonstrating compliance with all applicable County and State standards for
the areas impacted by development activities.
3. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the developer's shall dedicate to the county
a minimum 50-foot strip of land along 1 a-Mile Creek the entire length of the northern
property line, in a manner acceptable by the St. Lucie County.
4. Prior to issuance of a building permit for the first residential unit, the developer's, their
successors and assigns, shall provide for the creation/establishment of a Conservation
Easement over all areas of protected upland/wetland preservation areas as shown on
the project site plan. This conservation easement shall be in favor of St. Lucie County.
No alterations of land within these areas so designated may take place without the prior
consent of the County and determination by the County that the proposed activity is not
in violation of any provision of the County's Comprehensive Plan or development
standard of the County's Land Development Code.
5. Prior to issuance of the first building permit for this site plan, the applicant shall be
required to submit to the County a final tree mitigation plan that indicates the location of
all trees preserved and relocated and details the number of inches of trees removed. If
the mitigation credit does not exceed the tree mitigation criteria, the applicant will be
required to provide a means for satisfying the remainder of the tree mitigation criteria.
6. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for this site plan, the developers, their
successors and assigns, shall provide St. Lucie County with a management plan for all
areas of protected upland/wetland preservation areas as shown on the project site plan
that are to be covered through the creation/establishment of a Conservation Easement
over all areas.
7. The applicant shall be required to submit to St. Lucie County an annual monitoring report
demonstrating compliance with the above conditions. The requirement for this report
shall begin on the anniversary date of commencement of construction and shall continue
on that date until two (2) years after the completion of the development.
8. Prior to the issuance of any Land Clearing Permits for the Shadow Oaks @ 1 a-Mile
Creek Site, the developers shall clearly delineate all areas to be preserved and/or
protected. Delineation shall be by either the placing of silt fencing, safety fencing or
similar type of materials. Flagging shall not be used except to guide the installation of
the fencing materials. All land clearing activities shall be in accordance to the specific
conditions/standards outlined in the Land Clearing Permit.
.~
-..I
February 10, 2004
Page 10
Subject: Shadow Oaks @ 10-Mile Creek
RZ-03-031 & PUD-03-020
9. Right and left turn lanes along South 25th Street shall be constructed at the primary
project access driveways. All construction shall be in manner and form acceptable to
the Florida department of Transportation and St. Lucie County. These turn lanes shall
be constructed as part of the primary driveway connection onto South 25th Street. At
the option of the County, these specific improvements may be waived and the
developer's only responsibility is to pay funds equating to the cost to provide these
improvements if it is determined that it is more effective to have them constructed as part
of the planned widening of South 25th Street.
10. The developer shall as part of the construction of this development provide for the
construction of a weather shelter, or other similar structure at the main project entrance
with South 25th Street for the purpose of providing for a central pick-up and drop off
location for any school bus stops/demand response transit or other like transit activity
that may be caused by the development of this property.
Staff recommends approval of Draft resolution 04-013. If you have any questions, please let us
know.
SUBMITTED:
Director
DJM/cs
H :/wp/projectslshadow oaks/agendalshadow.memo.doc
cc: County Administrator
Ass!. County Administrator
County Attorney
Public Works Director
County Engineer
Fire Marshall
Robert Siegel, Centerline Homes
Julian Bryan, Julian Bryan & Associates
¥
"""
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
RESOLUTION 04-013
FILE NO.: RZ-03-031 & PUD-Q3-o20
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN
ZONING FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST.
LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND FOR
PRELIMINARY AND FINAL DEVELOPMENT
PLAN APPROVAL FOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS
SHADOW OAKS @ 10-MILE CREEK.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the
testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following
determinations:
CHANGE IN ZONING
1 . Robert Stieaele. Centerline Homes, presented a petition for a Change in Zoning from
RS-2 (Residential, Single-family - 2 du/acre) to PUD (Planned Unit Development) for
certain property in St. Lucie County, Florida, the purpose of which is to receive
Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development approval for an 84-unit townhouse
development.
2. On January 15, 2004, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on
the petition of Robert Stiegele, Centerline Homes, after publishing a notice of such
hearing in the Tribune and the Port St. Lucie News and notifying by mail all property
owners within the 500 feet of the property boundaries.
3. On February 17, 2004, this Board held a public hearing on the petition of Robert
Stiegele, Centerline Homes, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Tribune
and the Port St. Lucie News and notifying by mail all property owners within the 500
feet of the property boundaries.
4. The proposed zoning change is consistent with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive
Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County
Land Development Code.
SITE PLAN
5. Robert Stieaele. Centerline Homes, presented a petition for a Preliminary and Final
Planned Unit Development Plan for an 84-unit townhouse project known as Shadow
Oaks @ 10-Mile Creek.
File No.: RZ-03-031 and PUD-03-020
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-013
Page 1
1 6.
2
3
4
5 7.
6
7
8
9
10 8.
11
12
13
14 9.
15
16
17
18
19
20 10.
21
22
23
24
25
26 11.
27
28
29
30 12.
31
32
33
34 13.
35
36
37
38 14.
39
40
41
42 15.
43
44 16.
45
46
47 17.
48
49
-.,
....J
On December 2,2003, this Board approved Resolution 03-242 granting approval for a
Shoreline Variance to allow development within the required 300-foot shoreline
setback zone.
On January 15, 2004, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on
the petition of Robert Stiegele, Centerline Homes, after publishing a notice of such
hearing in the Tribune and the Port St. Lucie News and notifying by mail all property
owners within 500 feet of the property boundaries.
The petitioner, Robert Stiegele, Centerline Homes, is now seeking Preliminary and
Final Planned Unit Development for an 84-unit townhouse project known as Shadow
Oaks @ 10-Mile Creek.
On February 17, 2004, this Board held a public hearing on the petition of Robert
Stiegele, Centerline Homes, for Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development
approval for Shadow Oaks @ 10-Mile Creek after publishing a notice of such hearing
in the Tribune and notifying by mail all property owners within 500 feet of the subject
property.
The Development Review Committee has reviewed the Preliminary and Final Planned
Unit Development site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet all technical
requirements and to be consistent with the future land use maps of the St. Lucie
County Comprehensive Plan, subject to the conditions set forth in Part E of this
Resolution.
The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and
standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County
Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County.
The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the
character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities or other
matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare.
All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed
project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and
screening.
The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere
with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable
district regulations.
The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services.
The applicant has demonstrated that water supply; evacuation facilities and
emergency access are satisfactory to provide adequate fire protection.
A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this Resolution, was granted
by the Community Development Director on February 17, 2004.
File No.: RZ-03-031 and PUD-03-020
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-013
Page 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
~
'"
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
County, Florida:
CHANGE IN ZONING
A. The property on which the change in zoning from RS-2 (Residential, Single-
family - 2 du/acre) to PUD (Planned Unit Development - Shadow Oaks) is being
granted is described as follows:
A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN PART OF SECTION 29 AND 32, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH,
RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRINED AS FOLLOWS:
FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 32, RUN SOUTH 02°46'06" WEST
ALONG THE SECTION LINE, 1458.58 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 87°13'54" WEST 25 FEET
TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR HAWLEY ROAD FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
THENCE RUN NORTHWESTERLY ALONG A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST, (SAID
CURVE HAVING A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90 DEGREES AND A RADIUS OF 266.55 FEET) A
DISTANCE OF 418.70 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 02°46'06" EAST, 175.96 FEET; THENCE
RUN NORTH 77°17'28" WEST, 537.78 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 87°54'16" WEST, 1225.8
FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 00°55'06" EAST, 1188 FEET TO THE TOP OF THE SOUTH
BANK OF CANAL NO. 71; THENCE RUN SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE TOP OF THE BANK
2457 FEET TO THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE FOR HAWLEY ROAD. THENCE RUN SOUTH
02°46'06" WEST ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE 584 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PORTION THEREOF CONVEYED TO ST.
LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY DEEDS RECORDED IN OFFICAL RECORDS BOOK 734, PAGE
2463 AND OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 735, PAGE 1629 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST.
LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA.
PARCEL 21
A STRIP OF LAND LYING IN THE NORTHEAST ~ OF SECTION 32. TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH,
RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY
DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID NORTHEAST Y4; THENCE NORTH
89°55'42" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID NORTHEAST~, A DISTANCE OF 25.02
FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID SOUTH LINE AND THE WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE
OF SOUTH 25TH STREET; THENCE NORTH 02°31'39" EAST, PARALLEL WITH THE EAST
LINE OF SAID SECTION 32 AS SET FORTH BY STATE ROAD DEPARTMENT RIGHT OF WAY
MAP, SECTION 94504-2605, A DISTANCE OF 1442.23 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.
THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 02°31'39" EAST, ALONG SAID WEST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF
SOUTH 25TH STREET AND PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST LINE OF SECTION 32 AS SET
FORTH BY S.R.D., A DISTANCE OF 584.00 FEET TO THE TOP OF BANK OF TEN MILE
CREEK; THENCE NORTH 46°28'21" WEST, ALONG SAID TOP OF BANK, A DISTANCE OF
26.50 FEET TO A POINT ON A LINE 45.00 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST
LINE OF SECTION 32 AS SET FORTH BY S.R.D.; THENCE SOUTH 02°31 '39" WEST, ALONG
SAID LINE 45.00 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 32 AS
SET FORTH BY S.R.D., A DISTANCE OF 600.63 FEET TO THE INTERSECTION OF SAID LINE
45.00 FEET WEST OF AND PARALLEL WITH THE EAST LINE OF SECTION 32 AS SET
FORTH BY S.R.D. AND A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF
266.55 FEET, A CHORD DISTANCE OF 20.01 FEET AND A CHORD BEARING OF SOUTH
85°19'15" EAST; THENCE ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL
File No.: RZ-03-031 and PUD-03-020
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-013
Page 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13 B.
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 C.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
'-'
...¡
ANGLE OF 04°18'11" SOUTHEASTERLY A DISTANCE OF 20.02 FEET TO THE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
SAID LAND CONTAINS 42.07 ACRES MORE OR LESS.
Tax ID#: 2429-431-0060-000/5)
Location: West side of South 25th Street, directly across from Sweetwater Drive (southwest
corner of 25th Street and Ten Mile Creek)
Is hereby approved.
A copy of this Resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Part
C, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community
Development Director.
SITE PLAN
Pursuant to Section 11.02.05{B) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the
Preliminary and Final Site Plan for the project to be known as Shadow Oaks @ 10-
Mile Creek, be, and the same is hereby, approved as shown on the site plan drawings
for the project prepared by Julian Bryan & Associates on June 25, 2003, last revised
on November 20, 2003, and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County
Community Development Director on November 25, 2003, subject to the following
conditions:
1. No other restricted use or encroachment into the 300-foot shoreline
setback may be permitted, except as depicted on the site plan and
approved under Resolution 03-1841, shoreline variance application, unless
varied in accord with the applicable standards of the County's Land
Development Code.
2. As part of the submission of any construction plans for any activity in the
area of authorized encroachment, full and complete mitigation/restoration
plans shall be required demonstrating compliance with all applicable
County and State standards for the areas impacted by development
activities.
3. Prior to Issuance of the first building permit, the developer's shall dedicate
to the county a minimum 50-foot strip of land along 10-Mile Creek the entire
length of the northern property line, in a manner acceptable by the St.
Lucie County.
4. Prior to Issuance of a building permit for the first residential unit, the
developer's, their successors and assigns, shall provide for the
creation/establishment of a Conservation Easement over all areas of
protected upland/wetland preservation areas as shown on the project site
plan. This conservation easement shall be in favor of St. Lucie County. No
alterations of land within these areas so designated may take place without
the prior consent of the County and determination by the County that the
proposed activity is not in violation of any provision of the County's
File No.: RZ-03-031 and PUD-03-020
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-013
Page 4
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50 D.
51
52
53
--
...
....
-
~
.~
Comprehensive Plan or development standard of the County's Land
Development Code.
5. Prior to Issuance of the first building permit for this site plan, the applicant
shall be required to submit to the County a final tree mitigation plan that
Indicates the location of all trees preserved and relocated and details the
number of inches of trees removed. If the mitigation credit does not
exceed the tree mitigation criteria, the applicant will be required to provide
a means for satisfying the remainder of the tree mitigation criteria.
6. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for this site plan, the
developers, their successors and assigns, shall provide St. Lucie County
with a management plan for all areas of protected upland/wetland
preservation areas as shown on the project site plan that are to be covered
through the creation/establishment of a Conservation Easement over all
areas.
7. The applicant shall be required to submit to St. Lucie County an annual
monitoring report demonstrating compliance with the above conditions.
The requirement for this report shall begin on the anniversary date of
commencement of construction and shall continue on that date until two
(2) years after the completion of the development.
8. Prior to the issuance of any Land Clearing Permits for the Shadow Oaks @
1 a-Mile Creek Site, the developers shall clearly delineate all areas to be
preserved and/or protected. Delineation shall be by either the placing of
silt fencing, safety fencing or similar type of materials. Flagging shall not
be used except to guide the installation of the fencing materials. All land
clearing activities shall be in accordance to the specific
conditions/standards outlined in the Land Clearing Permit.
9. Right and left turn lanes along South 25th Street shall be constructed at the
primary project access driveways. All construction shall be in manner and
form acceptable to the Florida department of Transportation and St. Lucie
County. These turn lanes shall be constructed as part of the primary
driveway connection onto South 25th Street. At the option of the County,
these specific improvements may be waived and the developer's only
responsibility is to pay funds equating to the cost to provide these
improvements if it is determined that it is more effective to have them
constructed as part of the planned widening of South 25th Street.
10. The developer shall as part of the construction of this development provide for
the construction of a weather shelter, or other similar structure at the main
project entrance with South 25th Street for the purpose of providing for a
central pick-up and drop off location for any school bus stops/demand
response transit or other like transit activity that may be caused by the
development of this property.
The property on which this site plan approval is being granted is described in
Part A.
File No.: RZ-03-031 and PUD-03-020
February 17,2004
Resolution 04-013
Page 5
~
....¡
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
E. The approvals and authorizations granted by this Resolution for the purpose of
obtaining building permits on this property, shall expire on February 17, 2006,
unless the developer has obtained a building permit approval for the site plan
described in Part C or an extension has been granted in accordance with Section
11.06.06(B)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code.
F. The Final Planned Unit Development Site Plan/General Site Plan approval
granted under this Resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that
the petitioner, Robert Stiegele, Centerline Homes, including any successors in
interest, shall obtain all necessary development permits and construction
authorizations form the appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities,
including but not limited to; the United Stated Army Corp of Engineers, the
Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water
Management District, prior to the issuance of any local building permits of
authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in
Part A.
G. The conditions set forth in Part C are an integral nonseverable part of the site
plan approval granted by this Resolution. If any condition set forth in Section C is
determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the developer
declines to comply voluntarily with that condition, the site plan approval granted
by this resolution shall become null and void.
H. A copy of this Resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in
Part C, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community
Development Director.
After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows:
Chairman Paula Lewis XXX
Vice-Chairman John Bruhn XXX
Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX
Commissioner Doug Coward XXX
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 17TH day of February 2004.
File No.: RZ-03-031 and PUD-03-020
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-013
Page 6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
\w'
ATTEST
Deputy Clerk
Cs
H:\projects\Shadow Oaks\BCC\Agenda\Resolution040 13.doc
File No.: RZ-03-031 and PUD-03-020
February 17, 2004
"'"
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY
Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND CORRECTNESS
County Attorney
Resolution 04-013
Page 7
'-tiUNOFFICIAI.-
SUBJECT TO
PlANNING & ZONINI
C~1rw~;SSION APPROV4L
AGENDA ITEM 6: ROBERT STIEGELE - FILE NO. RZ-03-031/PUD-03-020:
\w'
Ms. Snay, presenting Staff comments, stated that Agenda Item # 6 was the application of
Robert Stiegele, Centerline Homes, for PUD (Planned Unit Development) approval for
the project to be known as Shadow Oaks @ lO-Mile Creek for an 84-unit townhouse
development for a 42 acres of land and for a change in zoning from the RS-2
(Residential, Single-family - 2 duJacre) to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) Zoning
District for property located at the southwest comer of South 25th Street and the North
Fork of the St. Lucie Riverffen Mile Creek.
Ms. Snay stated that the subject property is surrounded by AR-l (Agricultural,
Residential - 1 duJacre) to the north and south; IH (Industrial Heavy) to the west; RS-3
(Residential, Single-family - 3 duJacre) and RS-2 (Residential, Single-family - 2 duJacre)
to the east. She continued that there are existing residential uses to the north, south and
east and industrial uses accessed off of Selvitz Road to the west.
Ms. Snay explained that on December 2, 2003, the BOCC granted a shoreline setback
variance to allow the construction of portions of the roadway within 100 feet of the 300-
foot shoreline setback zone and to allow the construction of units 31 - 38 and 43 - 47
within 30 feet of the existing wetland and construction of two stonn water ponds within
50 feet of the shoreline. She also stated that the proposed site design includes 12 - 4-unit
buildings, 6 - 5-unit buildings and 1-6-unit building. The design also incorporates the
existing land features in order to preserve the environmentally sensitive areas onsite. Of
the total 42-acre site, the project has eannarked 36.12 acres of the site as open space
(which includes a 12-acre wetland and a number of areas containing native vegetation.
The proposed project is compatible with the character of the area and with the
surrounding land uses. The proposed low-density multi-family project will provide for a
transitional use from the industrial lands to the west and the single-family development to
the north and east. The proposed petition is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land
Development Code and is the Goa]s, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan.
Staff is recommending that this petition be forwarded to the Board of County
Commissioners with the recommendation of approval subject to the 11 limiting
conditions found on page 8 and 9 of the staff report.
Chainnan McCurdy questioned if the applicant or their representative were present.
Mr. Julian Bryan stated that he was the representative for the petitioner. He stated that he
has had the pleasure of working with all of the County Staff and especially with Amy
Mott in the Environment Resources Division.
Mr. Grande thanked the applicant for maintaining the two units per acre density.
P&Z / LPA Regular Meeting
January 15, 2004
Page 12 of 18
~NOffICIAL-
SUBJECT TO
PLANNJNG & ZONlN8
C_ISSION APPROVAl
Mr. Lounds questioned the floodway line and the height above the river. Mr. Bryan
stated that the average elevation was 8 1/2 to about 11 or 12. Mr. Lounds stated that he is
very concerned about flooding issues.
'--
Mr. Hearn asked the applicant to demonstrate on their plan where they meet condition
number 3, which is listed on page 8 of the staff report. Mr. Bryan pointed out the area
where the minimum 50-foot strip of land along 1O-Mile Creek began and ended. Mr.
Hearn also questioned would be financially responsib]e for condition number 10, listed
on page 9 of the staff report. Ms. Snay explained that the developer would be financially
responsible for this.
Ms. Hensley stated that St. Lucie County must realize that they cannot stop growth. She
advised that this plan allows for growth and also addresses all of the conservation as well
as schooling issues.
Mr. Grande stated that he is very concerned about the potential for flooding and would
like to know what Staff's position was on this. Ms. Snay explained that the Land
Development Code has Flood Protection Standards and that the applicant has met all of
those requirements.
Mr. Lounds stated that he is still concerned about flooding issues, but feels this is a good
plan. He continued that the applicant has gone to the extreme to make sure that all of the
environmental issues have been addressed, have not changed density, and the plan is
good overall.
Chairman McCurdy opened the public hearing.
Seeing no one, Chairman McCurdy closed the public hearing.
Ms. Hammer stated that she too was concerned over the flood issues. She stated that she
would like to see some sort of disclaimer made by the applicant to the buyers in the
Agreement of Sale, or something like that. Mr. Murphy stated that since this is a PUD
(Planned Unit Development) request, they could add additional limiting conditions. He
stated that they could include one to make sure the flood plain issues are disclosed. Ms.
Hammer confirmed she would like to suggest that be added.
Mr. Robert Stiegele, Centerline Homes, stated that they have that disclosure in their
contracts and those within the flood plain will also be required to purchase flood
insurance, so that is already built in.
Ms. Hammer stated that she is concerned that these buyers won't have that information
until they are at their closing and would like them to be informed at the time the
agreement of sale is signed. Mr. Stiegele stated that it wou]d be required to be in the
agreement of sa]e because the lenders would require it. Mr. Grande stated that would
protect only those who finance through a lender. He continued that anyone who
P&Z / LPA Regular Meeting
January 15,2004
Page 13 of 18
'-'
~OfFICIAL-
SUBJECT TO
P'-\NNlNG\ 1n,~'N8
C.~~LSS'O~ APrROYAL
Mr. StiegeJe stated that
purchases outright would not have the benefit of that disclosure.
he would make sure it is disclosed in all of their sale agreements.
Mr. Bryan stated that he would Jike to be sure that the condition is carefully worded
because there are vast differences between the words flood way and flood plain. He
stated that they have no problem adding the language to their contracts, but need to be
sure the resolution's condition is worded according the FEMA standards. He continued
that the motion could change the actual meaning and feels an engineer should work out
the wording to make sure of any possible Jiability.
Mr. Lounds stated that he is still very concerned about flooding and would definitely
request than the language be added to their sale agreements. Ms. Hammer stated that she
feels they should be proactive not reactive. Ms. Young stated that they could add a
condition that states they provide a disclosure to the buyer with regard to floodway issues
subject to wording approved by an engineer.
Mr. Lounds stated after considering the testimony presented during the public
hearing, including Staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in
Section 11.06.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommends that the St. Lucie County Board of
County Commissioners grant approval to the application of Centerline Homes for a
Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 dulacre) Zoning
District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Shadow Oaks) Zoning District
because I think they have put into the fact a lot of conscientious efforts. I like the
fact that they have restricted their density, but I want to have the comments
concerning our concerns of the flood plain, the flood area, addressed by their
engineer's staff as well as the County's engineer as a condition, and also subject to
the 11 limiting conditions listed in the Staff report.
Motion seconded by Mr. Grande.
Mr. Merritt stated that he was having a hard time supporting this request.
Upon a roll call vote the motion was approved with a vote of 7-1 (with Mr. Merritt
voting against) and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a
recommendation of approval.
P&Z / LPA Regular Meeting
January 15, 2004
Page 14 of 18
'-'
....J
BOARD OF
COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
~T.~eJ~IE .,
~.
'COUNTY "'-"~;,
. . F L" 0 RID A . ,.:..,
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
February 2, 2004
In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that ROBERT
STIEGELE has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-
Family - 2 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Shadow Oaks) Zoning
District for the following described property:
Location:
Southwest corner of South 25th Street and 10-mile Creek.
THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AILABLE UPON REQUEST
The second public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on
February 17,2004, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex,
2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard
at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The
County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least 3
days prior to a scheduled hearing.
County policy discourages communication with individual County Commissioners on any case outside of the
scheduled public hearing( s). You may speak at a public hearing, or provide written comments for the record.
The proceedings of the County Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any
decision made by the County Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,
he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of
the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn
in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying
during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the S1. Lucie
County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-
1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new
owner. Please call (772) 462-1960 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number: RZ-03-031/PUD-03-020.
Sincerely,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
---=:::> (', . ~ ) \~ A AA
?~;'--~-L1..'--~ K,~v~
Paula Lewis, Chair
JOHN D. GRUHN, District No, 1 . DOUG COWARD, District No, 2 . PAULA A, LEWIS, District No. J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No, 4 . CLIFF GARNES, District No, 5
County Adminisrrotor - Douglas M, Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce. FL 34982-5652
Administration: (772) 462-1590 · Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GISfTechnical Services: (772) 462-1553
Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 · Fax: (772) 462-1581
Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 · Fax: (772) 462-21J2
www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us
- ~
\.
~
- . --
. II iII·1 B Þ. n ït · C t!it~~ I. Ü ~Ê;5:1 I.. t ~ I I h
. ~!!I ~ ~,i II ~ ..~ III ¡ Js i '~lð=I:E;=äl ~I I ~1!i~!I=~ J! 'r I ~ -I ~ fi
111 ¡Ii i Ie -! II ~ r i ,,} ~'i!~=;IS"i~! I. 51 tli~MI!!¡' °"'1- 1 I t J~ ~I
'f' II; I i ~i i.. Iii !, f :!&111Icl::a~ ·1 I¡ 1i;~i&~I: (. - I~ II
I, 'II roe ~ I. r i t ~ Ii¡;~ 'C leël!i1_ II :!I I Ii t
~ !I;. ¡I ~ I. I! (&! 'L'.I!II, HI~;~lt lijfi f b
U iI "I ~ ~ 9 H· II I!Blllil~III!; I!!~IÞJ I I~ ¡ 'Ii
II ii' r. Jl ~ · If , 's:C' ø;l · I': 151 ' f I
o = ~ ~ k HI I ~ífd~! i~~~;lJ¡j 'b
~ þ k r þ i P I ¡p..~';; i I. ¡t~FI I! !~!
· ~ II ! i 1.151 Ill.ì!l· r "
iil IJ!oj JE ., i.ál-lli!i.!III;I!IIiH;!Hli¡æ!1 fllll!llilli : ~ (! 1IIIHIU~II:iill¡iB~1 ~II ~ I:'
ø 't· I J¡s ~ ~..:I!!.&I~!" ~~I:¡!5 ¡o~ ~ "4"'"11 . ili 11& !; e ;~ l I f¡1I1I.1I.õ1i1~"!i:liI¡I~1 ~ I" II::
i Ii!! Ifl ~ I i~IIP. H~S¡ !t_~ '1I,!êfM il f. II i I ~ii~~~ÎI'~~~ m , I¡~
I ~IIJ ;! !f!; ::.:I"II! ~il¡~t:1 15 f IllIìIl ~I 15 I ······~liÎ~ vl!f¡l. !'I '. I
¡ i!lf 'Ii i!l¡ 1~~11 ~!~ fl·' ilil~ i g Ii Ii. g~iltipti;i !I , i:
t:J I 1-:1 !'JI..~ t !1i1~1~~ i .'"iI!51 · II t! l ='~=~~~li:·.;¡lt. II: (i ~~
~ II . :!fi qefi '~ÞiIÚ¡II'lf ,i,8f!P !; If' I jr~i;i~;~~ ·,~H
I!! !f i~1 fd~k~h 1¡Is¡:~;al1 s. I:¡I~ ~ : i ihlUi II~J1~·1··1; ,
,·!l1 If :I!i l~ir¡¡~IIIþ. !d~~III! !Ir:~ ~ j ~ ~~:=:$'ii!l:d!L;: II
t .I iJ ·I~I . ¡¡;!a~ I~ §.@I::at¡;· Hla III liI!:'Ii'lel ~i I 1I1I1f~~r¡IICI!S;lfiE~"'!I
In ij i~q ~!d~r . q ,;r~ I: !! ~!~iFI"I~:'! ~I ~
!Ii Ii tl tq¡rl! IbiÞ!-¡!; II :lifl I í' IUlI!:liii' ¡~ i. i ~
J~II'1 ~i ¡1~I:tii, .I·~ i i1dL i: ~¡iiib;~}Ji ~ J ~
J. I I.. a=li i~1 '!!:I!llii I iil iii .1 ¡;; f !:1.tj~_I'C~Ri! 'I i A
I!I. II.: ~=;~ ~Bh iE~~I!;I ! ~1I~iI,~ ~ . ~IIHil'i~:~d:': ~~ ~ ~
,
~
-...I
Planning and Zoning Review: January 15, 2004
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
, /
FROM: Planning Manager \"'~ \l.
,
DATE: January 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Petition of Centerline Homes at 10-Mile Creek for a Planned Unit Development
approval for the project known as Shadow Oaks @ 10-Mile Creek, and for a
Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-family - 2 du/acre) Zoning
Districts to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Shadow Oaks) Zoning District
for a 42.07 acre tract of land to allow the construction of an 84-unit townhouse
project for property located at the southwest corner of South 25th Street and the
North Fork of the St. Lucie RiverlT en Mile Creek.
LOCATION: West side of South 25th street, directly across from
Sweetwater Drive (southwest corner of South 25th Street
and the North Fork of the St. Lucie RiverlTen Mile Creek.
EXISTING ZONING:
PROPOSED ZONING:
FUTURE LAND USE:
PARCEL SIZE:
PROPOSED USE:
SURROUNDING ZONING:
RS-2 (Residential, Single-family - 2 du/acre)
PUD (Planned Unit Development - Shadow Oaks)
RS (Residential, Suburban)
42.07 acres
84-townhouse unit development (2.0 du/acre)
AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) to the north
and south; IH (Industrial Heavy) to the west; RS-3
(Residential, Single-family - 3 du/acre) and RS-2
(Residential, Single-family - 2 du/acre) to the east.
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
The general existing use surrounding the property is
residential to the north, south, and east. Industrial uses
accessed off Selvitz Road are located to the west.
The Future Land Use Classification of the surrounding
area is RS (Residential Suburban) to the north and south;
'-'
"""
January 15, 2004
Page 2
Subject: Shadow Oaks/Centerline Homes
PUD-03-020 & RZ-03-031
fiRE/EMS PROTECTION:
IND (Industrial) to the west and RS (Residential Suburban)
and RU (Residential Urban) to the east.
Station #1 (6400 Rhode Island Avenue), is located
approximately three miles to the north.
UTILITY SERVICE:
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
Fort Pierce Utility Authority
RIGHT-Of-WAY
ADEQUACY:
South 25th Street has a right-of-way width of 120 feet. No
additional right-of-way is needed.
SCHEDULED
IMPROVEMENTS:
TYPE Of CONCURRENCY
DOCUMENT REQUIRED:
See below
Certificate of Capacity.
**********************
STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH
IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY
LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall
consider the following determinations:
1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the
St. Lucie County Land Development Code;
The applicant is requesting a preliminary and final PUD (Planned Unit Development)
approval for the entire 42.07-acre tract of land. The proposed rezoning has been
determined to not be in conflict with any applicable provision of the St. Lucie County
Land Development Code.
The design of this project includes a number of encroachments into the required 300-
foot shoreline setback for buildings, storm water management features and roadways.
On December 2, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners granted a shoreline
variance to allow construction of a roadway within 100 feet of the 300-foot shoreline
setback zone and to allow the construction of units 31-38 and 43-47 within 30 feet of the
existing wetland and construction of two storm water ponds within 50 feet of the
shoreline.
'-"
'WI
January 15, 2004
Page 3
Subject: Shadow Oaks/Centerline Homes
PUD-03-020 & RZ-03-031
According to Section 7.01.01 of the LDC, the purpose of the Planned Unit Development
(PUD) zoning district is to achieve residential land of superior quality through the
encouragement of flexibility and creativity in design options that:
A. Permit creative approaches to the development of residential land reflecting
changes in the technology of land development;
The applicant's proposed design includes the clustering of units around a central
roadway system. The proposed project will have three basic unit types: 4-unit
buildings; 5-unit buildings and 6-unit buildings. Within the overall design, there
are 12 buildings containing 4-units; six buildings containing 5-units; and one
building containing 6-units, for a total of 84 residential units. In addition, the
applicant's proposed design has incorporated the existing land features in order
to preserve environmentally sensitive area onsite.
Section 6.02.02 of the County's Land Development Code establishes a minimum
300-foot shoreline setback for all infrastructure development activities adjacent to
the St. Lucie River. Because of the location of a number of trees and a
significant wetland area, the petitioners requested and the Board of County
Commissioners approved relief from these provisions in order to permit the
construction of an access roadway, buildings and storm water ponds within the
300-foot shoreline setback line.
B. Allow for the efficient use of land, which can result in smaller networks of utilities
and streets and thereby lower development costs;
The project is designed with a central roadway system that loops throughout with
one central access point for entrance and exit. The access point into the project
is located on South 2Sh Street, immediately across from the existing Sweetwater
Drive. The proposed project was designed incorporating the necessary roadway
improvements proposed and currently being constructed by the St. Lucie County
Engineering Department for South 2Sh Street. Fort Pierce Utility Authority will be
providing water and sewer services to the project. The design of the project will
allow for the loop of services to lower the development costs of the project.
The configuration of the property is such that access to the property cannot be
acquired without encroaching into the required 300-foot shoreline setback zone.
The BOCC approved a variance allowing encroachment into the 300-foot
shoreline setback for the internal roadway, the construction of three units within a
maximum of 30 feet of the shoreline and the construction of two storm water
ponds. This variance was the minimum necessary to allow for the requested use
of the remaining acreage outside of the shoreline setback zone.
Further, the proposed design took into consideration the existing conditions on
the site, by placing most of the improvements within the areas of the site already
impacted by development and used as a grove.
~
""
January 15, 2004
Page 4
Subject: Shadow Oaks/Centerline Homes
PUD-03-020 & RZ-03-031
C. Allow design options that encourage an environment of stable character,
compatible with surrounding land uses; and,
The proposed project is compatible with the character of the area and with the
surrounding land uses. The property located to the west is designated with an
Industrial Future Land Use and IL ((Industrial Light) Zoning Designation. The
proposed project as a low intensity multifamily development will provide a
transitional use from the single-family development lying east of South 2Sh Street
and the more intense industrial uses lying to the west.
D. Permit the enhancement of neighborhoods through the preservation of natural
features, the provision of underground utilities and the provision of recreation and
open space.
The proposed project is located adjacent to 10-Mile Creek and cOr7tains a ·12.83-
acre wetland along the northwestern corner of the project. The site design'........,
incorporates the preservation of the entire 12.83-acre wetland. In addition, the
site design incorporates a number of existing trees within the open space areas.
As part of the site plan process, the developers and staff worked together to
redesign the site to preserve onsite vegetation within its natural state.
I,
/
As part of the site review and shoreline variance approval, staff requested and
the applicant has agreed to dedicate a 50 foot strip of land adjacent to the
northern property line to the county for use as part of the County's green ways
and trail system.
The application for Preliminary Planned Unit Development (PUD) approval has been
reviewed for consistency with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Land Development
Code and has been determined to meet all applicable standards of review.
2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the 51. Lucie
County Comprehensive Plan;
The applicant has demonstrated that the proposed PUD (Planned Unit Development)
amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan.
Policy 1.1.1.1 allows for residential development at a maximum of 2 du/acre. The
proposed project has been designed with a density of 2 dulacre, which is consistent with
the existing Future Land Use designation.
Policy 1.1.4.2 requires that new development be designed and planned in a manner,
which does not place an unanticipated economic burden upon the services and facilities
of St. Lucie County. The subject property is located in the Fort Pierce Utility Authorities
'-"
"-II
January 15, 2004
Page 5
Subject: Shadow Oaks/Centerline Homes
PUD-03-020 & RZ-03-031
designated service area. FPUA has provided the County with verification that sufficient
capacity is available to meet the demands of the project.
Policy 1.1.4.3 requires that the County encourage the use of cluster housing and
planned unit developments to conserve open space and environmentally sensitive
areas. The proposed project contains a 12.83-acre wetland that is being preserved
onsite. Of the total 42.07-acre land tract, the project design includes 36.12 acres
(85.9%) as open space, which exceeds the required 35% or 14.7 acres of open space
for this site. In addition, through micrositing the buildings, the developer has preserved a
number of trees onsite. As depicted on the site plan and a condition of approval of the
shoreline variance, the developers are proposing to dedicate to the County a 50-foot
wide linear strip of land along the northern property line which is to be incorporated
within the County green ways and trail system.
Objective 8.1.4.6 requires that wetlands be protected and maintained through reduced
paving, conservation easements, cluster site planning and the micrositing of buildings.
The proposed site design was created in a manner that minimizes impacts to the
existing 12.83-acre wetland. In actuality, the site design does not impact the wetland in
any manner. The buildings were microsited in a manner that not only protects the
wetland but also protects existing native vegetation on the site.
3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the
existing and proposed land uses;
This proposed change in zoning and the accompanying Planned Unit Development site
plan is consistent with the existing and proposed uses within the area. The property
located to the north of the subject property is a seven lot residential subdivision, then
property purchased by the St. Lucie County Environmental Lands program. To the east
is the Sweetwater residential subdivision. To the west are industrial lands and to the
south is vacant residentially zoned property. The proposed low-density multi-family
residential project will provide an appropriate transitional use from the low-density
residential development to the north, south and east and the high intensity industrial
uses to the west.
4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment;
There are no changes that would require an amendment.
S. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed
amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not
limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage,
schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities;
'-'
""
January 15, 2004
Page 6
Subject: Shadow Oaks/Centerline Homes
PUD-03-020 & RZ-03-031
The applicant is proposing an 84-unit townhouse development resulting in minimal
demands on public facilities.
The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has scheduled roadway
improvements for South 25th Street from Midway Road to Edwards Road, widening it
from a 2-lane facility to a 4-lane, facility in fiscal year 2004/2005. The County has
received a South Florida Management Permit for the improvements and has actively
been acquiring the necessary right-of-way for the improvements.
South 25th Street, north of the subject site is a 2-lane facility with a level-of-service
capacity of 15,600 daily trips. The current AADT for this roadway segment is 13,700
trips. There are an additional 3,078-committed trips. Therefore, the total trips for this
roadway segment are 16,778 exceeding the LOS by 1,178 trips. With the scheduled
roadway improvements, the LOS-capacity for this segment of the South 25th Street will
be 33,200. The increased LOS-capacity will support the proposed development project.
The completion of S. 25th Street south of project provides 33,200 trips. The existing
AADT is 13,500. An additional 3,864 trips are committed. 15,836 trips are available.
Using the formula found in the ITE, Trip Generation Manual, for Residential Townhouse
units, the proposed project is expected to produce 561 daily trips. During the Peak A.M.
Hours the project is expected to create 37 trips (6 - inside the development and 31-
outside the development). During the Peak PM Hours the project is expected to produce
45 additional trips on the roadway network (30 in and 15 out). 70% of the trips produced
by this project are expected to go north on South 25th Street and 30% of the trips are
expected to go south on South 25th Street.
The applicant's Traffic Impact Analysis indicates that the roadway links surrounding the
site, with the scheduled South 25th Street roadway widening improvements, are
projected to operate at acceptable levels-of-service with the addition of the proposed
development traffic.
The proposed project will be serviced water and sewer by the FPUA. The applicant has
received confirmation that sufficient capacity is available to meet the demands of the
proposed project.
6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
significant adverse impacts on the natural environment;
The ± 42-acre site contains a wetland community of good quality and an upland area
that was heavily overgrown with exotic plant material that has been cleared. Within this
site four plant communities were identified: Bottomland Hardwoods, Hammock,
Brazilian Pepper and Herbaceous Upland.
The Bottomland Hardwood forest stands in the north central to west portion of the site,
encompassing 12.83 acres. The canopy consists of a mixture of hardwoods such as
water hickory (Carya aquatica) and red maple (Acer rubrum) and associated species
such as cypress (Taxodium sp.) The understory consists of several ferns such as
swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum) and leather fern (Acrostichum danaeifolium) and
other associated species such as green arum (Peltandra virginica). Very few exotic
'-"
'WI
January 15, 2004
Page 7
Subject: Shadow Oaks/Centerline Homes
PUD-03-020 & RZ-03-031
plants have invaded the area. There was standing water observed in the lowest areas a
stream meanders through the area connecting it to the river. The underlying soil type is
Fluvaquents. This soil type is typically found on floodplains of rivers and streams and is
highly variable, ranging from sand to clay. The applicant has preserved the entire 12.83
within the site design.
To the south of the bottomland hardwood forest lays the hammock area, about 15.23
acres in size. This area consists of numerous live oak (Quercus virginiana) trees with a
heavy Brazilian pepper invasion, which has recently been cleared. The understory
vegetation was lacking due to the dense brush growth of the pepper. The elevation of
this area is several feet higher than the adjacent wetland. The soil types found included
Ankona sand, Nettles sand and Susanna sand. These three types of soils are typically
found on broad flatwoods. Each also has black sand near the surface to varying depths
with the Ankona having the shallowest layer of black sand and Susanna having the
deepest. Each also has grades to lighter shades of gray at deeper depths.
The eastern section and the extreme northwest corner of the site consisted of a dense
Brazilian pepper forest with little to no understory, about 9.45 acres in size. This area
lies at the same elevation as the hammock. Nettles sand and Wabasso sand are
present in the eastern area. Wabasso sand is similar to the other sands with a slightly
deeper layer of black sand at the surface. Since the northwest corner area is adjacent to
the creek, it lies within the Fluvaquents soil type. Actual soils, however, more closely
resemble those present in the other Brazilian pepper area.
Between the hammock and the Brazilizan pepper and south of the pepper lie disturbed
herbaceous upland areas. The southern portion, approximately 2.04 acres in size, is a
remnant citrus grove that has been cleared and the portion in the center of the site,
approximately 1.79 acres in size, contains a variety of upland grasses and scrubby
species. These areas have been cleared with the exception of the gopher tortoise
burrow area where orange construction fencing was erected to prevent encroachment.
Nettles sand occurs in this area.
The gopher tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus), a species of special concern, was found
and documented to be using the central upland herbaceous area for burrowing. There
were six active gopher tortoise burrows and two inactive gopher tortoise burrows found
on the site. In the site design, 2.03 acres located in the northwestern corner of the site
has been preserved for habitat for the gopher tortoise population. The FWCC requires
that 1.7 acres be set aside for the gopher tortoise population found on this site, the
applicant's design exceeded the minimum required for gopher tortoise habitat set aside.
Section 7.01.03(1) of the Land Development Code requires that a minimum of 35% of the
entire site be preserved as open space. The applicant's design incorporates 36.12-
acres of the 42.07-acres as open space, this equates to 85.9% of the site. This open
space includes the storm water features, wetland and wetland buffer areas, large areas
of trees and recreational areas.
7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an
orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative
affects of such patterns;
\..i
'WI
January 15, 2004
Page 8
Subject: Shadow Oaks/Centerline Homes
PUD-03-020 & RZ-03-031
The subject site is designated with a RS (Residential Suburban) Future Land Use Map
designation, which permits the development of a Planned Unit Development, with a
maximum density of 2 du/acre. The applicant's request is for a 84-unit multi-family
development, developed at a density of 2 du/acre. The property to the north, south and
east are designated for residential development. To the west is heavy industrial zoned
property. The proposed low-density multi-family residential development will provide an
appropriate transitional use from the low-density residential to the north, south and east
and the high intensity industrial development to the west. With the development of this
Planned Unit Development (PUD) the general character of the surrounding properties
will not change from the existing residential character.
8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest,
and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code;
The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in
harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code.
COMMENTS
The petitioner, Center lines Homes, is seeking approval for a preliminary PUD (Planned Unit
Development) for the Shadow Oaks @ 10-Mile Creek Site Plan to permit the construction of a
84-unit multi-family development on a 42.07-acre parcel of land located at the southwest corner
of South 25th Street and the North Fork of the St. Lucie RiverlTen Mile Creek.
Staff has determined that the proposed zoning designation and the Preliminary Planned Unit
Development Plan is compatible with the existing and proposed uses in the area. This petition
meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11 .06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land
Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie
County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of
County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval subject to the following conditions:
1.) No use or encroachment into the 300-foot shoreline setback may be permitted, except
as depicted on the site plan and approved under Resolution 03-1841, shoreline variance
application, unless varied in accord with the applicable standards of the County's Land
Development Code.
2.) As part of the submission of any construction plans for any activity in the area of
authorized encroachment, full and complete mitigation/restoration plans shall be
required demonstrating compliance with all applicable County and State standards for
the areas impacted by development activities.
3.) Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the developer's shall dedicate to the county
a minimum 50-foot strip of land along 10-Mile Creek the entire length of the northern
property line, in a manner acceptable by the St. Lucie County Attorney.
8.)
9.)
10.)
11.)
'-'
..I
January 15, 2004
Page 9
Subject: Shadow Oaks/Centerline Homes
PUD-03-020 & RZ-03-031
4.)
Prior to issuance of a building permit for the first residential unit, the developer's, their
successors and assigns, shall provide for the creation/establishment of a Conservation
Easement over all areas of protected upland/wetland preservation areas as shown on
the project site plan. This conservation easement shall be in favor of St. Lucie County.
No alterations of land within these areas so designated may take place without the prior
consent of the County and determination by the County that the proposed activity is not
in violation of any provision of the County's Comprehensive Plan or development
standard of the County's Land Development Code.
5.)
Prior to issuance of the first building permit for this site plan, the applicant shall be
required to submit to the County a final tree mitigation plan that indicates the location of
all trees preserved and relocated and details the number of inches of trees removed. If
the mitigation credit does not exceed the tree mitigation criteria, the applicant will be
required to provide a means for satisfying the remainder of the tree mitigation criteria.
6.)
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for this site plan, the developers, their
successors and assigns, shall provide St. Lucie County with a management plan for all
areas of protected upland/wetland preservation areas as shown on the project site plan
that are to be covered through the creation/establishment of a Conservation Easement
over all areas.
7.)
The applicant shall be required to submit to St. Lucie County an annual monitoring report
demonstrating compliance with the above conditions. The requirement for this report
shall begin on the anniversary date of commencement of construction and shall continue
on that date until two (2) years after the completion of the development.
Prior to the issuance of any Land Clearing Permits for the Shadow Oaks @ 10-Mile
Creek Site, the developers shall clearly delineate all areas to be preserved and/or
protected. Delineation shall be by either the placing of silt fencing, safety fencing or
similar type of materials. Flagging shall not be used except to guide the installation of
the fencing materials. All land clearing activities shall be in accordance to the specific
conditions/standards outlined in the Land Clearing Permit.
The applicant shall be required to correct any damages to the existing sidewalk along
South 25th Street resulting from improvements to the proposed project site.
Right and left turn lanes along South 25th Street shall be constructed at the primary
project access driveways. All construction shall be in manner and form acceptable to
the Florida department of Transportation and St. Lucie County. These turn lanes shall
be constructed as part of the primary driveway connection onto South 25th Street.
The developer shall as part of the construction of this development provide for the
construction of a weather shelter, or other similar structure at the main project entrance
with South 25th Street for the purpose of providing for a central pick-up and drop off
location for any school bus stops/demand response transit or other like transit activity
that may be caused by the development of this property.
'-"'
..",,¡
January 15, 2004
Page 1 0
Subject: Shadow Oaks/Centerline Homes
PUD-03-020 & RZ-03-031
Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter.
Attachment
cs
Projects/shadow oaks/bcc/memo
cc: County Administrator
County Attorney
Public Works Director
Environmental Resource Manager
'-"
wi
January 15, 2004
Page 11
Subject: Shadow Oaks/Centerline Homes
PUD-03-020 & RZ-03-031
Suggested motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested change in zoning.
MOTION TO APPROVE:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING,
INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN
SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE
THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE
COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT APPROVAL TO THE
APPLICATION OF CENTERLINE HOMES, FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE RS-2
(RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY - 2 DUlACRE) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE PUD
(PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - SHADOW OAKS) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE ....
[CITE REASON [S] WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC].
MOTION TO DENY:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING,
INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN
SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE
THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE
COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPLICATION OF
CENTERLINE HOMES, FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE RS-2 (RESIDENTIAL,
SINGLE-FAMILY - 2 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE PUD (PLANNED UNIT
DEVELOPMENT - SHADOW OAKS) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE....
[CITE REASON [S] WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC].
'-'
~
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
H.
RS-2
RESIDENTIAL. SINGLE-FAMILY - 2
(
1 . Purpose
The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for single-family
dwellings at a maximum density of two (2) dwelling units per gross acre, together with such other
uses as may be necessary for and compatible with low density residential surroundings. The number
in "0" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section
3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further
defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code.
2. Permitted Uses
a. Family day care homes. (999)
b. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of
one thousand (1000) feet of another existing such family residential home with and provided
that the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS)
notifies the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home
is licensed by HRS. (999)
c. Single-family detached dwellings. (999)
3. lot Size Requirements
Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
(
4.
Dimensional Regulations
Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
5. Off-street Parking Requirements
Off-street parking requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.06.00.
6. Conditional Uses
a. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of another such
family residential home. (999)
b. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999)
7. Accessory Uses
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00.
¡.
Adopted August 1, 1990
105
Revised Through 08/01/00
-
'-'
....I
(.--,
CHAPTER VII
DEVELOPMENT DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT
STANDARDS
7.00.00
GENERAL PROVISIONS
7.00.01
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Chapter is to provide development design and improvement standards applicable to
development activity in the unincorporated area of the County.
7.01.00
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
7.01.01
PURPOSE
The Planned Unit Development (PUD) District is intended to achieve residential land development of superior
quality through the encouragement of flexibility and creativity in design options that:
A. permit creative approaches to the development of residential land reflecting changes in the
technology of land development;
B. allow for the efficient use of land, which can result in smaller networks of utilities and streets and
thereby lower development costs;
C. allow design options that encourage an environment of stable character, compatible with surrounding
land uses; and
D. permit the enhancement of neighborhoods through the preservation of natural features, the provision
of underground utilities, and the provision of recreation areas and open space.
7.01.02 AUTHORIZED USES
A. PERMITTED USES
Any permitted, conditional or accessory use in the Agricultural-1 (AG-1); Agricultural-2.5 (AG-2.5);
Agricultural-5 (AG-5); Residential/Conservation in the Agricultural-1 (AG-1); Agricultural-2.5 (AG-2.5);
Agricultural-5 -(AG-5); Residential/Conservation (RC); Residential, Estate-1 (RE-1); Residential,
Estate-2 (RE-2); . Residential, Single-Family-2 (RS-2); Residential,' Single-Family-3 (RS-3);
Residential, Single-Familÿ-4 (RS-4); Residential, Multiple-Family-5 (RM-5); Residential, Mobile Home-
5 (RMH-5); Residential, Multiple-Family-7 (RM-7); Residential, Multiple-Family-9 (RM-9); Residential,
Multiple-Family-11 (RM-11); and Residential, Multiple-Family-15 (RM-15) zoning districts ofthis Code
may be permitted in a Planned Unit Development District subject to complying with the residential
densities described in Section 7.01.03(B).
Adopted August 1, 1990
375
Revised Through 08101/00
v
'-'
Section 7.01.00
Planned Unit Development
B. NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT USES
Uses of the types permitted in the Commercial, Neighborhood (CN) District are also permitted up to
an amount not to exceed three (3) percent of the gross area of the Planned Unit Development or ten
(10) acres, whichever is less. In addition, playgrounds, public and non-public parks, golf courses,
country clubs, bicycle paths, racquet sports facilities, riding stables, marinas, clubhouses, and lodges
may be permitted in a Planned Unit Development District.
7.01.03
STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS
Standards and requirements for a Planned Unit Development shall be as follows:
A. MINIMUM SIZE
A Planned Unit Development shall be a minimum of five (5) contiguous acres of land unde~ common
ownership or control.
B. DENSITY
The maximum possible permitted density of a Planned Unit Development shall not exceed the density
reflected in the Future Land Use Maps of the Comprehensive Plan. On North and South Hutchinson
Island, the provisions of Section 3.01.03(AA)(B) shall govern.
C. AREA, YARD, AND HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS
Area, yard, and height requirements shall be determined at the time of Preliminary and Final
Development Plan approval, except that for any structure on North or South Hutchinson Island that
has not been occupied, constructed, or has not received a building permit, site plan or other County
development approval as a permitted use prior to January 10, 1995 the requirements of Section
4.01.00, Hutchinson Island - Building Height Overlay Zone shall apply.
D. PUBLIC FACILITIES
1. The Planned Unit Development shall be designed and located so there will be no net public
cost for the provision of water lines, sewage lines, storm and surface drainage systems, and
other utility systems.
2. The minimum size of all water mains used, or intended for use, in fire protection activities i~
six (6") inches. Actual water main requirements will be determined by the St. Lucie County-
Ft. Pierce Fire Prevention Bureau.
3. The minimum size of all water mains used, or intended for use, in fire protection activities,
that are located on a dead-end water main is eight (8") inches. Actual water main
requirements will be determined by the St. Lucie County-Ft. Pierce Fire Prevention Bureau.
Adopted August 1, 1990
376
Revised Through 08101/00
""
.'wtI
Section 7.01.00
Planned Unit Development
The maximum number of fire hydrants that may be located on any dead end water main is
one (1).
4. Fire hydrants shall be provided at a minimum spacing of one every six hundred (600) feet
unless otherwise approved by the St. Lucie County-Ft. Pierce Fire Prevention Bureau.
E. TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION
1. Every dwelling unit, or other use permitted in the Planned Unit Development shall have
access to a public street either directly or through an approved private road, a pedestrian
way, or other area dedicated to public or private use.
2. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to permit smooth traffic flow with
controlled turning movement and minimum hazards to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. Minor
streets within the Planned Unit Development shall not be connected to streets outside the
development so as to encourage their use by through traffic.
3. The proposed Planned Unit Development shall be designed so that it will not create traffic
congestion on the arterial and collector roads surrounding the project, or such surrounding
collector or arterial roads shall be improved so that they will not be adversely affected.
4. All non-residential land uses within the Planned Unit Development shall have direct access
to a collector or arterial street without creating traffic hazards or congestion on any street.
5. Streets in a Planned Unit Development may be dedicated to public use or retained under
private ownership. Said streets and associated improvements shall comply with all pertinent
County regulations and ordinances, however, variations to the standard minimum right-of-
way widths may be considered as part of the Planned Unit Development if it is shown to the
satisfaction of the Board of County Commissioners, that the requested variation is consistent
with the intent of the County's roadway construction standards and necessary for the design
of the Planned Unit Development.
6. All roads and streets shall intersect at an approximate ±5° angle of ninety degrees (900)
unless circumstances acceptable to St. Lucie County indicate a need for a lesser angle of
intersection.
7. Street jogs or centerline offsets between any local street or road with another local street or
road, shall be no less than one hundred fifty feet (150).
8. The intersection of any two local roads or streets with a Major Collector or Arterial Roadway
shall be separated by a minimum distance of six hundred sixty feet (660), as measured from
centerline to centerline.
9. Permanent dead-end streets shall not exceed one thousand feet (1000) in length.
Cul-de-sacs shall be provided at the end of all dead end roads or streets greater than five
Adopted August 1, 1990
377
Revised Through 08/01/00
'"
..,
Section 7.01.00
Planned Unit Development
hundred and one (501) feet in length. The length of a dead-end street shall be measured
along the centerline of the street from the its point of perpendicular intersection with the
centerline of intersecting street to the end of the dead-end street or roadway. All cul-de-sacs
shall have a minimum right-of-way diameter of one hundred (100) feet.
If the dead end roadway is five hundred (500) feet or less in length, a "Y" or 'T' type of turn
around may be approved.
If a dead end street is temporary in nature then a temporary cul-de-sac shall be required until
the roadway is connected to another street or road.
In the center of the cul-de-sac an unpaved island, surrounded by a curb, improved with grass
and landscaping that will not interfere with sight distance, may be provided. Center islands
shall have a diameter of not less than seventeen (17) feet, unless otherwise approved
through the review of the Planned Unit Development.
10. All roadways, exclusive of interior parking and access aisles areas, regardless of ownership,
shall be located a minimum of ten (10) feet from any exterior building walls, except for
security gate houses or similar security structures located in a private street or road right-of-
way.
11. Any pedestrian circulation system and its related walkways shall be insulated from the
vehicular street system. This shall include, when deemed to be necessary by the Board of
County Commissioners, pedestrian underpasses or overpasses in the vicinity of playgrounds
and other recreation areas, local shopping areas, and other neighborhood uses which
generate a considerable amount of pedestrian traffic.
12. Access points on all collector or arterial streets serving a Planned Unit Development shall be
located and spaced so that traffic moving into and out of the arterial streets do not cause
traffic congestion.
F. PARKING AND LOADING
1. General Provisions
a. The number, type, and location of parking spaces shall be determined at the time of
final Planned Unit Development plan approval. The determination of the number of
spaces required shall be based on Section 7.06.01 (F) of this Code. The number of
parking spaces required by this section may be reduced based on substantial
competent evidence that the reduced number of spaces is adequate for the
proposed use or that parking may be shared by proximate uses that operate at
different times or on different days.
b. Reserved parking spaces may be provided, in lieu of paved spaces, subject to
Section 7.06.02(C) of this Code.
Adopted August 1, 1990
378
Revised Through 08/01/00
'"
~
Section 7.01.00
Planned Unit Development
2. Off Street Parking and Loading
Off-street parking and loading requirements are governed by Sections 7.06.02 and 7.06.03
of this Code, and the following standards:
a. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be designed to provide travelways
between adjacent uses while discouraging through traffic.
b. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be screened from adjacent roads and
pedestrian walkways with hedges. dense planting, or changes in grades or walls.
3. On Street Parking
In Planned Unit Developments, on street parking may be used so long as the road on which
the on-street parking is proposed lies entirely within the limits of the defined Planned Unit
Development and such parking would not contravene any other provision of this Còde or the
S1. Lucie County Code of Ordinances. Where such on street parking and loading is used, it
shall be consistent with the following design standards:
a. The minimum size of a parking stall shall be as follows:
parallel
angled
handicapped(parallel)
handicapped(angled)
8 feet X 23 feet
10 feet X 18 feet
12 feet X 23 feet
12 feet X 18 feet
b. Handicapped parking spaces shall be appropriately marked.
c. Access for emergency fire vehicles shall be in accordance with NFPA standards.
d. No more than fifteen (15) parking spaces shall be permitted in a continuous row
without being interrupted by a minimum landscape area of 360 square feet.
G. LIGHTING
All lighting facilities shall be arranged in such a manner so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous
interference of any kind to adjoining streets or properties.
H. LANDSCAPING AND NATURAL FEATURES
1. Native trees and vegetation and other natural features shall be preserved to the extent
practicable.
2. All sensitive environmental vegetation, trees and areas shall be preserved to the extent
practicable.
Adopted August 1, 1990
379
Revised Through 08/01/00
'r
.."I
Section 7.01.00
Planned Unit Development
3. Landscaping for oft-street parking and loading areas shall meet the minimum requirements
of Section 7.09.00.
I. OPEN SPACE STANDARDS
1. A minimum of thirty-five (35) percent of the gross area of land to be committed to a Planned
Unit Development must be for use as common open space, which may include, parks,
recreation areas, bicycle and pedestrian paths and facilities, marinas, swimming beaches,
common open space, common landscaping and planting areas, or other areas of public
purposes or use other than street, road or drainage rights-of-way, above ground utilities,
excluding stormwater treatment facilities, and parking areas.
A minimum of 15 percent of any existing native upland habitat on the property, must be
preserved in its natural condition as part of the required 35 percent common open space,
For each acre of preserved native habitat above the required minimum 15 perc~nt that is
preserved in its original state, credit shall be given at a rate of 150 percent per acre towards
the remaining common open space requirement.
All areas to be dedicated for common open space shall be identified as part of the
Preliminary Development Plan for the Planned Unit Development. Areas that are floodways,
lakes, wetlands, and stormwater retention areas may be applied to satisfy the total common
open space requirement, subject to the requirement that 15% of any existing native habitat
on the property must be included as part of the required 35% common open space. As part
of the Final Planned Unit Development submission process, the developer or petitioner for
the Planned Unit Development shall provide for one of the following:
a. The advance dedication of all common open space to a public, or acceptable private,
agency that will, upon acceptance, agree to maintain the common open space and
any buildings, structures or improvements that have been placed on it. All such
dedications or conveyances shall be completed prior to the issuance of any building
permits, including land clearing, for any portion of the Planned Unit Development ;or,
b. A phased conveyance of the land to a public or acceptable private agency that will,
upon acceptance, agree to maintain the common open space and any buildings,
structures or improvements that have been placed on it. The schedule for the
phased conveyance of any such lands to be used for common open space shall be
a specific condition of approval for the Planned Unit Development.
2. No parcel of lañd identified for use as a park or comm-on open space shall be less than one
(1) contiguous acre; and a!f such areas sh~1I be physically part of the Plånned Unit Devel-
opment.
3. Areas provided or reserved to meet any other environmental preservation or protection
requirements of this code or other lawful regulatory authority may be counted towards the
overall common open space requirement, provided that the common open space meets the
Adopted ~gust 1, 1990
380
Revised Through 08101/00
v
'-'
Section 7.01.00
Planned Unit Development
requirements of this Code.
J. SETBACKS FROM AGRICULTURAL LAND
Planned Unit Developments adjacent to land used for agricultural purposes, or designated for
agricultural use on the Future Land Use Map of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, shall
provide setbacks from the agricultural land sufficient to protect the function and operation of those
uses from the encroachment of Urban activities or uses.
K. PHASING
1 . A Planned Unit Development may be developed in more than one stage or phase.
2. If a Final Development Site Plan approved by the Board of County Commissioners is to be
developed in stages or phases, each successive phase shall be constructed and Qeveloped
in a reasonably continuous fashion. No more than two (2) years shall elapse between the
completion of any stage or phase, and the final stage or phase shall be completed within ten
(10) years of the date of Final Development Site Plan approval. Extensions of the above
requirements are subject to approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Unless
otherwise amended by the Board of County Commissioners through the Final Development
Site Plan review process, the following sequence of development must be adhered to:
a. One or more major recreation facilities and other major amenities, planned to serve
the entire development, shall be completed or adequate security posted prior to the
issuance of building or mobile home permits of more than forty (40) percent, or other
percentage as determined by the Board to be appropriate based on circumstances
that include the size of the project and the proposed phasing schedule, of the total
number of authorized dwelling units. Recreation facilities or facilities and other
amenities planned to serve one (1) phase of a multi-phased development shall be
completed or appropriate security posted prior to issuance of building or mobile
home permits or the recording of any final plat within that phase.
b. No commercial facility shall be permitted prior to the completion of at least forty (40)
percent of the total number of authorized dwelling units; and,
c. For Planned Unit Developments to be constructed in stages or phases, the net
density of an individual stage or phase may vary from the approved Final Site Plan
s~bject to the requirements in Section 1 ~ .02.05.
Adopted August 1, 1990
381
Revised Through 08101/00
aa. PUD
v
Adopted August 1, 1990
...,¡
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT
See Section 7..01.00
"
145
Revised Through 08101/00
(
('
(
""
..",¡
..... z
1
Q) r¢ I I
Q) 0
0) "-"1
Q) C")o -$' ¡ i i
-+-oJ 01
(j) IC")
-+-oJ C")o .~ ~ 11
~ 0 ~
Q) NO
..0 <-
0 a:=> \ <- ~ I
a: CL
II::
I!
,
'\
..
...
~
z
::>
o
CI'IOIi .-ï""'- Ü
'"
...
II::
~
Z
::>
0
ü
..... :IIICIiIIIIIOIu
a:
w ¡ ..... -.r.I IJIIQI
> ª
ã: II I
... ;. ._-".
:I! : I
..
II:: I _aDoS alai!
Z
<C
i5 ..Z·j ,...,
~
'"
...
II::
z
... ¡::
... a:
... <C
II:: ::!:
...
5
YN
...
..
...
I
~..
/
..
...
II::
~.
II::
S lot 1
S SE 1
S 9E 1
'\
"
,UNnOJ
3380HJ33>10
'r
...,I
A Petition of Robert Stiegele for a Change in Zoning from RS-2 (Residential,
Single Family, 2 dLtacre) to PUD (Planned Unit Development).
[[II ~
RZ 03-031 & PU 0 03-020
f/ /77 /~ This, pattern indicates
~ subject parcel
r--'
1 1
I '-I
1 I
I I
I I
I I
Ir..____
r---'
1 (
I 1
1 I
I
r-----......
I )
1 1
I J
1___--:.-:....
r -- - - J
t ..."--
---
L- )
oJ
( )
...-
( Î
~
.
(--
,
l_
~.L~~,
GIS ~<.,_~
t
Map prepared December 29. 2003
tNIlNIP .. .... cxrnpIIId b QMWIIp.rwq IInd .....-a UPOMI cn,. N
VHI .., 1IDrt.. ... .... tD pICMde the InllllCUIIIt nI .....
IrIbmIIIan pœIIIIe..ltnat....., Iar~. .~bir*Ig dDcImn.
- -
~
'..I
Robert Stiegele
ITIII RM-9~
--
L_ )
"
1
RS-2
...-
r--' ------..
I I I I
'-
I ¡ I I
'IH I J
I I ----:.-
I I _.-.--- ~
I I _----1
'-----
i' "
ð; , ; 'I ' !. (Î
= ,l, ,I
13 ' ·
. '
·
·
AR 1
·
----I
(
I
I
I
(--
I
l_
Map prepared December 29. 2003
t
RZ 03-031 & PU 0 03-020
V /77/ ~ This, pattern indicates
~ subject parcel
5t:- .;(~$ a,~
TNI mat:! hili been ~ fOrglnlnlpIInnWIg Md ~ ~ cnIy. N
WhiIt ..,......beIn"..... pI'DIIIdIlhI rnDIt~Md ~
~ ..-IÞII.'II naI~ 1Dr~........, '*dnG dacumn.
~
Land Use
r--'
I L. I
I~D ¡ I
I I
I ¡
~----
------....
I
J
I
J
--:=:-~
--- - J
.--
---
r---'
I (
I I
I I
,
""
Robert Stiegele
RM
RS
( )
..-
( Î
~
·
·
RS
·
·
·
RS
(--
I
l_
RZ 03-031 & PUD 03-020
v /77 / ~ This. pattern indicates
~ subject parcel
5è.L___ ,4,~
GIS ~"<''''_~
Map prepared December 29, 2003
t
ThIIINfI - been ~ bglfllfll.."q Md ....... ~ q. N
VINe eøy .nart.. ÞeIn "... b pIMdI .... .,.. 0JINII1fICI ___
InbTnIaon JaIIb I, I.. nat irItrIåd tar ~ _ . ~ binding docurnn.
~
""
,~ . . ...
. ''f1ir-
t
, '. I'
f!, , "" ."
. I ". ";Î~
, V " ' I..
, .0- ' ¡, ),
.' " ¡ I:' .'
. " I
. í f .; : J' I \'
. t'
'."'~'~'"
" '-\
, \:
03-020
sr~.~~~ f
Map prepared December 29. 2003
W~ This, pattern indicates
subject parcel
m. ItWp - ~ oaIY1*d tDrOlf'lRlplnq ... ..... ~ cnr· N
VIIIhIII.-y 1fIcItn. ~ I'NdlIo pnwIØI" mallCUNntMd ~
inIormIIMan IX*I*. it II ......... Iar ~ _ . IIgIItf tJrdnQ docunInl
1'..
~
>.."I
AGENDA - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
January 15, 2004
7:00 P.M.
ROBERT STIEGELEhas peúiioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning /ì-om the RS-2
(Residential, Single-Farmly - 2 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development)
Zoning District for dIc /ò/Jowing described property:
Locaúon:
Southwest comer of South 25th Street and 10-Mile Creek.
Please note that all proceedÙIgs before the Planning and Zoning CommissIon/Local Planning
Agcncyarc electronically rccorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning
and ZOl1lilg CommÚwon/LocaJ Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at such meeúilg
or hearing; he WIll need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to
ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the tesúmonyand
evidence upon which thc appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding,
individuals tesàfýlilgdur1ÍIg a hearing WIll be sworn lil. Any party to the proceeding WIll be granted an
opportunity to cross-examine any 1Íldivldual tesàfýing during a hearing upon request. Written
comments received in advance of the public hearing WIll also be consldered.
Prior to this public hearing; noàcc of the same was sent to all aqjacent property ownersJanuary
5, 2004. Legalnoàce was published in The News and The Tnoune, newspapers of general circulaúon
in St. Lucic County, onJanuary 5, 2004.
File No. RZ-03-031 / PUD-03-020
~
""
-
BOARD OF
COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
~=¡=. ~eJ t: IE - ',,'
COUNTY' .'
F LOR I D A --,'.",
-
T_
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
January 5, 2004
In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that Robert
Stiegele has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-
Family - 2 dulacre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development) Zoning District for the
following described property:
Location:
Southwest corner of South 25th Street and to-mile Creek.
THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
The fIrst public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on
January 15, 2004, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex,
2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard
at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Written
comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission should be received by the County Planning Division at
least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing.
County policy discourages communication with individual Planning and Zoning Commission and County
Commission on any case outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or
provide written comments for the record.
The proceedings of the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to
appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any matter considered at
such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying
during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-
examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing
may be continued to a date-certain.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie
County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-
1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new
owner. Please call (772) 462-1960 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number RZ·03·031/PUD-03-020.
Sincerely,
ST. }..UÇIE COU~Y ~LANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION
~~. '//' / A ../-' '" !^
-?"-.~_/ / /- _ -:_---~;..,::c~~_-://'¡y (~
Ed Merritt, Chairman -' .
JOHN D ßr,UHN, District NO.1· DOUG COWAr,D, District NO.2· PAULA A. LEWIS, District No. J . mANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No, 4 . CLIFF ßAr,NES, DistricT No, 5
County AdministroTor - Douglos M, Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652
Administration: (772) 462-1590 · Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GISfTechnicol SeNices: (772) 462-1553
Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 · Fax: (772) 462-1581
Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 · Fax: (772) 462-2132
www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us
-_..~~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N'7'!Jtt! N N N -3
I.>J ¡ I.>J I.>J I.>J W I.>J I.>J I.>J t'> I.>J I.>J I.>J W t'> W t'> t'> t'> t'> t'> t'> i!3 i!3 i!3 i!3 i!3 i!3 i!3 i!3 i!3 i!3 i!3 =
gig g g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'C. t ~ 6
...1... .. Þ-" ~ .. .... ... ... ~ -- """" ~ .... ~ ~ -- .- ... tv W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :¡;: :¡;: :¡;: ~ .- _ =-=
il~ i i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i i ~ i i i ~ ~ ~.~ ~ i i i ~ i
~I~.N 00 8 00 8 13 ~ W S ~ ~ § 8 - 8 13 8 U> ....¡ 00 ~ Š ~ ~ N 00 _ U> ~ _
~~~~
\.»I"JI"JI"J
BBBB
~~~i
~~~I"J
(I) ~ ~§ ~¡I ~i.:~¡ ~ §
~.., ðs:'II';'=...o
~ I» ki6 ~ '" iO = =
S!t I~ ¡-¡Þ-t ~ ~
~ : ~
!
¡
-~T<:!t""'
o ¡:;;;- õ·
?f ,_. <
~¡§ I»
it'" 0
"'1:1
rfJ
o
o
....
N
'¡:;' iN N
l.I'Ij,þ¡. tv
:::!~ ~
~Ir ~
..... j t"Þ (þ
~ii
::s!~ ?-
Q.,o 0
>¡~ (j
<:.::r t:;.
~~
t"'."O
= _.
(') 0
_. ..,
o
(j
o
=
::s
-<
S:~~1?~g:'
E. ¡;¡ ...; '" ~ 0
:=:::s::ti~C/)$E
~ 0 ::s ¡;; ~::s
..,
"'1:100
Õ' 0 0
_. (JQ (JQ
~ ¡;; ¡;;
.., ::s ::s
æ.Qg~~~;~~~~~Q~Q~~Z
I» '" - _. - ::s 0 < - (') ~ - _. < ::s <: ::s g¡
::s ~ 0 3 "0 "0 3 -. E? II';' I» fG ~ ¡¡;. Õ 3 "0 ¡;¡
0:::1::S@E;E;"OQ.::so",::S1» ;:!.Q.E;0
::t 0 0 0 '" '" ~ ~ (') 5' 0....
I» "r t'" t'" § ñ· 0 t'"
~Õ.d en ::c d
~ e. ~
~ So ~
"0 0
o ::s
~ ~
~ õ
'" (j
*
~1?~~~~~g:~~~Qš'
.g::s(');¡::sn>..¿::s< <-õ"'::S
:ræ.~o~~ >i5:i5::re¡æ.
gQ.!!.::S"'tT1::C ZZ;I> Q.
tT1 .... to~. ét s:
o '<
:::a
"r "r "r "r '"Tj"r "r
o 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ ::1 ~ ::1 ::1
"'1:1"'1:1"'1:1"'1:1"'1:1"'1:1"'1:1
õ' õ' õ' õ' õ' (i' tr
ti r:! ti (i ~ (i ti
o ('þ ro 0 n 0 0
'"Coo>
;t>oo::s
_. (JQ (JQ =:
::::; = = 0
000
.., ::s ::s
....
o
::s
o
'"
¡
I
1
~ ~ ~'I
I» _. Š
e: ~ :::a I
~ Q. ,
::s 0 .
01 i
i !
¡ ¡
~i~~j
~ [I~
01 1::S
¡ i
I !
1 I
~~ ~Inl(l)
E; ¡å I. §
Q. - ~
~ >1
>1 :
I' i
i
1 i
I I
1
I
~~~~I
ta ~ ~ è51
~ (I) (I) I (I) I
~ ~ ~ I
¡;;~~~I
~ i i il
a a aJ
o 0 0 I
.., .., ..,
Si' Si' Si'¡
I I
I ¡ !
i
~ 61 61 itl'
a ::1 ::1 ::1
ta~~~
!II !II 0 0
0> ¡:¡ ¡:¡ I ¡:¡ ,
g. 0 0,0 I
ì
I
i
I
i
i
fJ fJ fJ fJl
! i
.1 i·..
I"J I.>J I.>J ~¡ II.>J' W W W W W W W W W W
~ t t -I it ~ t 8 t t t t t t t
~ ~ ~ ~ i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ïp ~ ?3 ~ ~
~ &. &. &.I~¡&. VJ ~ &. W '" '" 00 ~ '" b.. '"
0\ ....... .... ......_-,J1.W ¡::: f.;,) ..""" 0\ U'I VI U'I W U\ V'I L1'I VI
~ N:: ~;.... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Z
I»
"0
ñ'
..,
~9tj~
(') .... ð I»
§ a¡ ~ ¡::
o 5 g ~
'"
-3........>
5· 0 0 ::s
I»§§¡;'
o ~ ~ g
tT1tT1t"'"
~
s
....
§:
(I):::as:s:
§ 0
¡;. ~ ~. ~
~ g r.o
~ I» >
t"'!!:
5'
o
o
"'I:I~O'IWW WNNNWWU>W
O-~1.>J~0~~~~~8U>-0'I~NN
ta8U>13~~õS~:::~~~~8u>88
~~[~~~~§§§~~~~~§ii
-(JQoõQ.@~~~~~~~S~~:r:r
~ 5' .., -d 0 oQ' -. 0 0 0 _. -. ,..;¡ 0 _. 0 ~ ~
~;·0:::1.3::S~333~~~~~31»1»
ñ'" 0 ~o t'Þ 0 0000000'<'<
> ::s 0 ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ 3 3 ~ 0 3 ~ ~ ~
~o:::ao~~ooo~~(j;l>~ooooo
1-1 c. 1-1 CI'J 1-1 1-1 1-1 CI'J CI'J ::;" ~ CI'J 1-1 ~ c.n
~ 0 tI) tI) (I) 0.., Si' 0 tI) =
<:; 1-1 '"1 So
'in! "r ~ <: "r (I)
o '0 ~ 0 0 =
='::1 a a ::1 ~
~¡~ to ~ §
~¡~ 0 ~ ~
~!~ ~ ~
:::a I :r
§i
(')1
0:
"',
!
"'1:1
~
3
,ta
o
'I»
(')
::r
O~tT1
[8~
I» ::s (I)
::c~
g~;P~Q~
< - Õ e-
o ::s .., :.!-_
.., 0 ....
o
'"
<
i5:
s:~~
Pi ~ ¡¡;
II';' e¡ 0
g ~::s
N
ñ'
en
e.
So
o
I»
~.
'"
-3
..,
ã
ã
"0
-3
a
~
~
::s
Q.
....
š
o
'"
:::a
~"'I:I~
I» ~ §
if ~.
:::1. ;.
~ >
s:
e¡
(JQ
ã
WNU>U>NNNN
U> U> U> U>
13~~8
W I.>J
~~
~ ~
00 00
N N
~~
U> U>
88
w W I.>J
~ ~~
~ ~~
00 00 00
"f NN
wW",,,,
I.>Jtu>u>
N~O'IU>
....¡....¡ooo
'"Tj61d'616161t""'t'
§.::1::1::1::1::1~!*
'TI'TI(I)"'I:I"'I:I'TI!!.!!.
¡:f ¡:f - ñ' ñ' ¡:f' § §
¡:¡iit"'iiii¡:¡Q.Q.
o 0 ~ 000
ñ·
U>
-
o
N
~~~~~
000s,Q.
S" S" S" I» ;.
tototata::S
~~~~~
I» I» '" I» ::s
Si'Si'Si'Si'~
§
o
N W
U> ....¡
000
I.>J _
W.....
....¡ N
W U>
~w
¡¡;(I)tI)~
~~~§
caSoS-[
g.$Q$Q::t'
S" Q.
o
..,
~¡j>
88~
O::C~
§ oQ' '"
o~
§.~
:::a~
Q.~
6161616161
::1 ::1 ::1 ::1 ::1
~~~~~
o 0 0 0 0
(i (i (i (i ~
o 0 0 0 0
616161Q~t'(j
::1::1::1"'a~~
"'I:I"'I:I"'I:I~ -
(;j' ñ' ñ' tI) "'1:1 §
ii¡:¡ii'3~Q.
t'Þ 0 0 ::sO 3
(JQ ta
'" 0
Pi
:r
_L..
fJifJ'fJ fJ ~ §: fJ fJ fJ ~ fJ ~ fJ fJ fJ fJ fJ fJ ~ fJ ~ fJ fJ fJ ~ ~ fJ ~ ~ fJ fJ fJ Ê
o
I.>J W
I.>J W
00 00
- -
W W
W W W W
tttt
00 00 00 00
...... 1-"'''''''''''''
v. v. v. v.
...... ...... ...... I-'"
8888
W W
~~
~ ~
U> 00
- -
w W W
~~ W
~~ ~
~~ ~
u.u.www
§§~§~
~
8
o
N
a:;i:'
e:. .a
==
::s :1
(JO a
t""o
¡æ.
;>~
., (j
~~
~ê
e~
....«
¡:oi:'
"=~
SS-
e~
, 0
sa
= .
;>~
., Q
~(JO
g.;¡
o "0
:1e:
(l)f:I
c~
iÆ Q
~ª
'"
-
õ'
::s
(I)
o
.,
;::;.
f:I
Œ
~
8
o
I"J
Z
'"
8
o
~
....
~
~
N
ë
N
-6'
-
\v'
"'0
~
o
N
o
...
N
-
-
-
- -
~'r ;j~(Ni¡ ~"
I".> I".> t; 11 t; i.i. = i.i...
I".> I".> I".> 1".>1, "
g g g giie!!
8881811*1:
¡- ~ il§i!. ".
$~Iw "
~ ' i Ii '
;;¿ n -1.'. O'r.. 0:.... r..... i I........ .......
o = Iii ¡ ii ,I ~ '
= 81n in "= '1
= 0 0 10 'I" ,
::I ¡ , I·
è: d_
~ j ¡ i: :'
¡ í ~ ¡ : '
i ¡
1 "I
'__'_-<_-'-"""'-1"" .
j¡;' Q I ri' I ri' ii Z ¡
n r.n!ñ Ie; He! ':
fš e¡ I'" :'" U; ','
- 'iNf
~. ,
::: I. '
--l-L-I' ;
, IO!OiZ
I ! ii i ii; ~
I 'n: n ""
10; 0,'"
i ' ; 'I".>
I
I
1
! ¡ , ::
i i ; ,
--t-i~j~i¡Z'
! in In 11=
I 1= i= :'=
I ~~H"
I ' ' ¡,¡:,.
I
I
I' ' ,
I ' " ..'
, <j .'
I,¡:,. ~11~llõ¡f:f~!,'
VI 0 .... ....'IQ.'
\01".> I~I,,:
CI'J ~ I :z; I ii œ
~ I~' ""J
~ ~ Cl'JiCI'Ji¡
i s:~~!i
& ~ CI'J¡CI'J;¡
Sf ~ 1....1.... Ii
M " '....
.:r¡ , ,I
! ¡ "
i '
,
i
i
n
ó1 ó1 ~-'I~:¡g,
::1.::1.::1. ::I.,I~
:s:! :s:! CI'J Cl'Jii
~. g" r:.i~;:
n (i ~ 1(") ;¡
I (i¡ ¡:¡. I'
I
'~
~
"N
:8
II "I".>
---+---T
"'!1 "'!1 "'!1 "'!1" rIJ,'
r- r-.r-jr-I.¡&:....¡:
I ",
I jrt'Þ;1
"ri.... . 1.1.- ._... .,'
_.~ i ¡¡~!
\0 il'C I,
~I~ i :: I
~ Ô\ W!W¡! ,;
~ VI ,þ.''¡:''q
~\O 0\ \0'1..\0.11..'.'.'
00 0 00 00/1:
~_~-~~r 7_ "
a::~
~ "
c:'C
.. ~
::I ::1
(JQ =
~"
.. =
¡Q.....
S's.
" n
~~
==
tNc
= :.
tN....
-~
Ro~
"=~
Sg.
e'C
tN8
I "
sæ.
e.
S'~
"J5
~~
C"'C
s.e:
rlJl'I
.... ....
.. =
J¡ S'
~ª
~
....
S'
=
rIJ
"
3.
1'1
Œ
.----X COMMISSION ACTION:
L. :J APPROVED 0 DENIED
C--.J OTHER
~
\....-
\
""
To:
Submitted By:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
"wi
Agenda Request
Item Number
Date:
5;:-
02117/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
Board of County Commissioners
Presented By
~
Environmental Resources Ma er
Consider Draft Resolution 04-015 granting a Variance from Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a)(2)
of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - St. Lucie River Shoreline Setbacks,
for property located at 6414 Riverland Drive.
Public Works
Petition of Joseph and Laura Vardalis through agent Dennis Corrick, for a Variance from
Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - St. Lucie
River Shoreline Setbacks. to allow for the continued use of a deck within 75 feet of the
Mean High Water line of the St. Lucie River. (File No.: BCC-04-001)
N/A
None.
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-015.
Approved 5-0
CURRENCE:
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
p"",.","" ~
Other: ~
'C~.WeJ)
~oordínationl Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
County Attorney ,~
Originating Dept: V-tv,.-ib ~
Finance: (
'-"
....J
Commission Review: February 17, 2004
Public Works Department
Environmental Resources Division
MEMORANDUM
TO: County Commission
FROM: Environmental Resources Manager
DATE: February 10, 2004
Subject: Petition of James J. and Laura J. Vardalis through agent Dennis
Corrick, for a Variance from Section 6.02.02(8)(2)(a)(2) of the St. Lucie
County Land Development Code - St. Lucie River Shoreline Setbacks.
LOCATION: 6414 Riverland Drive
ZONING DISTRICT: AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential-1du/acre)
FUTURE LAND USE: RS (Residential Suburban)
PARCEL SIZE: 0.86 acre
SURROUNDING ZONING:
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
RIGHT -QF-WA Y
ADEQUACY:
AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential-1 du/acre)
Riverland Drive is an access easement. The nearest right-
of-way is Parkland Boulevard, which is located at the
northern end of Riverland Drive. The western end of
Parkland is 50 feet wide, increasing to 80 feet as the
roadway extends east to Citrus Avenue.
SCHEDULED
IMPROVEMENTS:
None.
STANDARDS OF REVIEW
Mr. and Mrs. Vardalis have requested relief from Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a)(2) of the St. Lucie
County Land Development Code - St. Lucie River Shoreline Setbacks. In reviewing this
application for a variance to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Board of County
Commissioners will consider and make the following determinations:
'-'
....I
February 10, 2004
Page 2
Subject: James and Laura Vardalis
File No.: BCC-04-001
1. The variance requested arises from conditions that are unique and peculiar to the
land, structures, and buildings involved; that the particular physical
surroundings, the shape, or topographical condition of the specific property
involved would result in unnecessary hardship for the owner, lessee, or occupant,
as distinguished from a mere inconvenience, if the Provisions of Section
6.02.02(8)(2)(a)(2), are literally enforced; that they are conditions that are not
ordinarily found in the same Zoning District, and the conditions are created by the
regulations of Section 6.02.02(8)(2)(a)(2), of this Code, and not by an action or
actions of the property owner or the applicant.
The applicants are requesting a variance from Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a)(2) in order to
permit the continued use of a deck along the western property line of their property
located at 6414 Riverland Drive. There is an existing walkway along the St. Lucie River
located approximately 10 feet from the top of bank. The proposed deck along the
western property line would be constructed within 21 feet of the mean high water line
(MHWL) and, therefore, have a maximum deficit of 50 feet of the required setback from
the mean high water line. A variance request of 10 feet or more of this 75-foot setback
requires a review and determination by the Board of County Commissioners.
The provisions of Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a), of the Land Development Code establish
setbacks from the shoreline of the North Fork of the St. Lucie River in which
development activities are either prohibited or restricted. This section specifies that no
development activity that would alter the native vegetation of the shoreline of tributaries
of the North Fork of the St. Lucie River shall be permitted within 75 feet of the mean high
water line for lots platted after August 1, 1989. The subject property is located within an
unrecorded subdivision, and is, therefore, is subject to the 75-foot setback requirement.
The requested variance arises from conditions, which are unique to the property
involved. The purpose of the 75-foot setback from the mean high water line is to protect
any native vegetation located within this setback and along the shoreline. The existing
deck will not result in any negative impacts to native vegetation. The bank of the St.
Lucie River in this area has previously been negatively impacted by walkways and a
boat dock. There is no native vegetation located within the 75-foot setback area. The
granting of this variance would allow the applicants to continue the use of the deck
without negatively impacting adjacent properties.
2. The granting of this variance will not impair or injure other property or
improvements in the neighborhood in which the subject property is located.
The reduction of the buffer zone has been determined to have no significant impact upon
the water quality and shoreline protection needs of the St. Lucie River. The subject
property already has a walkway and dock on the St. Lucie River and, therefore, no
degradation of the shoreline would be expected to occur if the setback is reduced from
the current 75 feet to the proposed 21 feet for the deck.
'-"
....,
February 10, 2004
Page 3
Subject: James and Laura Vardalis
File No.: BCC-04-001
3. The variance is the minimum that will make possible the reasonable use of the
land.
The requested variance is the minimum variance required in order to allow the deck to
remain in its current location.
4. The variance will not be opposed to the general spirit and intent of this Code or
the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan.
The proposed variance is not opposed to the general spirit and intent of the St. Lucie
County Land Development Code or Comprehensive Plan. The variance, if granted,
would allow the continued use of the deck that would closely resemble other decks
constructed at homes in the neighborhood.
Comments:
The applicants are requesting a variance from Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a)(2) in order to permit the
continued use of a deck along the western property line of their property located at 6414
Riverland Drive. There is an existing walkway along the St. Lucie River located approximately
10 feet from the top of bank. The proposed deck along the western property line would be
constructed within 21 feet of the mean high water line (MHWL) and, therefore, have a maximum
deficit of 50 feet of the required setback from the mean high water line. A variance request of
10 feet or more of this 75-foot setback requires a review and determination by the Board of
County Commissioners.
The provisions of Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a), of the Land Development Code establish setbacks
from the shoreline of the North Fork of the St. Lucie River in which development activities are
either prohibited or restricted. This section specifies that no development activity that would
alter the native vegetation of the shoreline of tributaries of the North Fork of the St. Lucie River
shall be permitted within 75 feet of the mean high water line for lots platted after August 1, 1989.
The subject property is located within an unrecorded subdivision, and is, therefore, is subject to
the 75-foot setback requirement.
The requested variance arises from conditions, which are unique to the property involved. The
purpose of the 75-foot setback from the mean high water line is to protect any native vegetation
located within this setback and along the shoreline. The existing deck will not result in any
negative impacts to native vegetation. The bank of the St. Lucie River in this area has
previously been negatively impacted by walkways and a boat dock. There is no native
vegetation located within the 75-foot setback area. The granting of this variance would allow
the applicants to continue the use of the deck without negatively impacting adjacent properties.
Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms with the standards of review as
set forth in Section 10.01.02, St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict
with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff,
therefore, recommends approval of the requested variance.
Attached is Draft Resolution 04-015, which, if approved, would allow for the continued use of a
deck within the 75-foot setback required from the Mean High Water line of the North Fork of the
St. Lucie River.
~
~
February 10, 2004
Page 4
Subject: James and Laura Vardalis
File No.: BCC-04-001
Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter.
SUBMITTED:
val=YYì~
Environmental Resources Manager
cc: James and Laura Vardalis
Dennis Corrack
County Administrator
County Attorney
Public Works Director
Planning Manager
File
'-"
""'"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
RESOLUTION 04-015
FILE NO.: BCC-G4-G01
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A VARIANCE FROM SECTION
6.02.02(B)(2)(A)(2), ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE - ST. LUCIE RIVER SHORELINE SETBACKS FOR JAMES J.
AND LAURA J. V ARDALlS.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the
testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following
determinations:
1. James J. and Laura J. Vardalis throuah aaent Dennis Corrick, presented a petition for a
Variance from the Provisions of Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a), St. Lucie County Land
Development Code, St. Lucie River Shoreline Setbacks for property located at 6414
Riverland Drive, along the North Fork of the St. Lucie River.
2. On February 17, 2004, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a
notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the
subject property.
3. After consideration ofthe testimony presented during the February 17,2004, public hearing,
including staff comments and the standards of review for granting variances set forth in
Section 10.01.30, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Board of County
Commissioners has made the following determination:
1. The requested variance meets the standards of review as set forth in
Section 10.01.30 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and
is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the Sl Lucie
County Comprehensive Plan.
2. The variance granted will not impair other property or improvements in
the neighborhood.
3. The variance granted is the minimum needed to allow the continued
use of the deck.
4. The variance granted meets the general spirit and intent of the St.
Lucie County Land Development Code and the St. Lucie County
Comprehensive Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
County, Florida:
File No.: BCC-Q4-001
February 17,2004
Resolution 04-015
Page 1
'-"
~
1
2
3 A. The petition for a Variance from the Provisions of Section 6.02.02(B)(2)(a), St. Lucie
4 County Land Development Code, St. Lucie River setback standards, submitted by James J. and
5 Laura J. Vardalis is granted for the property described as follows:
6
7 PARCEL I:
8
9 FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 20, RIVERDALE YACHT CLUB ESTATES UNIT
10 2, AS PER PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6, PAGE 40, PUBLIC RECORDS OF
11 ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN THENCE NORTH 15 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY,
12 PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 20 EXTENDED WESTERLY 318.3 FEET;
13 THENCE SOUTH 23 DEGREES 11' W 77 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 24 DEGREES 59' WEST 76.7
14 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE TRACT HEREIN DESCRIBED; FROM SAID POINT
15 OF BEGINNING, RUN SOUTH 29 DEGREES 15' W, 100 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34 DEGREES
16 101 W 100 FEET; THENCE NORTH 50 DEGREES 24' WEST 125.8 FEET TO THE EAST BANK
17 OF THE NORTH FORK OF THE ST. LUCIE RIVER; THENCE MEANDERING THE EAST BANK
18 OF THE NORTH FORK OF THE ST. LUCIE RIVER, RUN NORTH 36 DEGREES 23' EAST 104.4
19 FEET; THENCE NORTH 88 DEGREES 35' EAST, 140 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING,
20 THE SAME BEING A PART OF LOT 216 OF THE PLAT OF WHITE CITY, AS PER PLAT
21 THEREOF RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 23, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE
22 COUNTY, FLORIDA, TOGETHER WITH AN EASEMENT FOR INGRESS AND EGRESS OVER,
23 UPON AND ACROSS THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN WARRANTY DEED
24 RECORDED IN DEED BOOK 203, PAGE 61, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY,
25 FLORIDA; ABOVE DESCRIBED PROPERTY ALSO BEING KNOWN AS LOT 3 OF AN
26 UNRECORDED PLAT OF TOMLlNSONS PLAT OF PART OF LOTS 215 AND 216, WHITE CITY.
27
28 AND,
29
30 PARCEL II:
31
32 THAT PART OF LOT 216 OF WHITE CITY, AS PER PLAT THEROF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK
33 1, PAGE 23, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY
34 DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF BLOCK 20, RIVERDALE
35 YACHT CLUB ESTATES, UNIT 2, AS PER PLAT THEREOF, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 6,
36 PAGE 40, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, RUN THENCE NORTH 15
37 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID BLOCK 20 EXTENDED
38 WESTERLY, 318.3 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 23 DEGREES 11 MINUTES WEST, 77 FEET;
39 THENCE SOUTH 24 DEGREES 59 MINUTES WEST 76.7 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 29 DEGREES
40 15 MINUTES WEST ,100 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 34 DEGREES 10 MINUTES WEST 100 FEET
41 FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 51 DEGREES 46 MINUTES WEST, 100
42 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 63 DEGREES 48 MINUTES WEST 100 FEET; THENCE NORTH 6
43 DEGREES 53 MINUTES EAST, 135.1 FEET TO THE WATERS EDGE OF THE ST. LUCIE RIVER;
44 THENCE NORTH 59 DEGREES 14 MINUTES EAST, ALONG SAID WATERS EDGE 101.8 FEET;
45 THENCE SOUTH 50 DEGREES 24 MINUTES EAST, 125.8 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING;
46 ALSO KNOWN AS LOT 4 OF TOMLINSONS UNRECORDED PLAT OF PART OF LOTS 215 AND
47 216, WHITE CITY.
48
49
50 TOGETHER WITH RIGHT OF WAY EASEMENT OVER, UPON AND ACROSS THE FOLLOWING
File No.: BCC-04-001
February 17,2004
Resolution 04-015
Page 2
'-"
.....,¡
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
LANDS: THE 30 FOOT PRIVATE ROAD RUNNING FROM PARKLAND BOULEVARD IN A
NORTHWESTERLY DIRECTION, LYING BETWEEN LOTS 1 THRU 9 TO THE NORTH, LOTS 10
AND 11 TO THE WEST, LOTS 12, 13 AND 14 TO THE SOUTH, BEING TRACTS 1-13
COMPRISING PARTS OF LOTS 215 AND 216 OF PLAT OF WHITE CITY SUBDIVISION, AS PER
PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 23, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. (Tax ID#:
3409-705-0003-000-9)
(Location:
6414 Riverland Drive)
C. This variance is for the continued use of a deck within 25 feet of the Mean High Water Line
of the St. Lucie River.
D. The variance shall not be valid for a period longer than twelve months from the date of th is
Resolution - February 17, 2004 - unless a building permit is issued or an extension is
granted.
After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows:
Chairman Paula Lewis
Vice-Chairman John Bruhn
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson
Commissioner Cliff Barnes
Commissioner Doug Coward
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 17th Day of February 2004.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY
Chairman
ATTEST:
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND CORRECTNESS:
Deputy Clerk
County Attorney
File No.: BCC-Q4-001
February 17,2004
Resolution 04-015
Page 3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 .
9 .
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
'-"
-.,I
Exhibit A
Maps
General Location Map
Area Subject to the Shoreline
Variance
File No.: BCC-04-001 Resolution 04-015
February 17, 2004 Page 4
z
c_ C-24 0
~--- I »
z
s: :II -- I :II
CMIL '011
» II: --- ----------r--- .. II:
~ ;:
Z ... .... -----""" 1:1.·L I .= ...
i I :IJ
<:
m
:IJ
() Lie _ -----
0 ,-_.--!'!!'_-- ",,-
C
Z ()
::;! no 0
C
Z
::;!
:II :II
... :g
...
... ...
1.
\
OKEECHOBEE
COUNTY
T 36 5
T 35 5
T 34 5
:II
¡
:D
I
...
...
...
...
ftÞ
...
...
~
,~
if.
~$~
C-
O)
3
CD
') \ \. en
co
() Qo
~ () r
0 0)
c:
~ ~
I 0)
0 <
0
--10. 0)
~
a..
0)
en
z ..'
'-"
..,.¡
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L______
II
--¡
2.
..........-'"
( .~ \
, ~ \
............. \
,,../
7
""T
5
of
J
I
2111
White Ook Lone
5
/5
7 , II 10 . 11 IJ
2117
2111
~ ",. / "-'
-
BCC 04-001
r 11111 II 11Th is pattern inqicates subject parcel
k~;~:~;~~:-./':IThiS pattern indicates City of Port St. Lucie
5ìr4~~:~
_7~
Map prepared Januæy 26. 2004
,
ThIIIIMpn."'~largllleNlpiltrlll'Ga'Id~~anIy. N
'MIll .-.¡ -"art '- .., rr.- to pnMdI .. ~ ø.mnIlnd .....
JnbmIIiøn poIIibIe, 1;" not HIndId for.... . . IIgIIr' t:nfIng docurIR.
'-'" .."
James & Laura Vardalis
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L_____
2N AR-1
........-'\
/' (~ \
, \
........,)
1
""T
5
of
of
J
2
2111
White Ook Lone
5
.
7 .
,
10
, 12 IJ
I
~R-1
2117
2111
- ,
~.' \.".
BCC 04-001
r 1IIIIIIIIThis pattern indicates subject parcel
t: . ¿ <, ':1 This pattern indicates City of Port 81. Lucie
5iF4~~~
ctMiJ .." ~-,
Map prepared January 26, 2004
~
lhIiI map '* '--' ~ for~pIn'Ii'Ig and ...... p.IpOIII 0Ift· N
'WhIle .., IIIIort '* beIn INde to p'CMdI .. rI'IDII ~ Ind aICU'IIII
~ PØIIIbIe. III nat~ 1arw...1IgIIIy binding darunMI.
~ ....,
James & Laura Vardalis
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
L_____
2.
rqs;-;--\
, \
\
,J
- Z1 -
c
c c 10
Z . c
(/ '8 z
(/
II
iT 2J
..
J
I
White Oak Lone
2'111
5
IS
7 .
,
"
. II IJ
2'111
RS
2'111
"
"
" " ,
",- ."..-.-" '-" '
Map prepared January 26. 2004
~
BCC 04-001
r IIIIIIII ThiS pattern indicates subject parcel
12', ~._:~::é~2< I This pattern indicates City of Port St. Lucie
:if" 4~_:, ~um~
ThiI rNP .. ~ 0CII'\13IId lor ØI"I'II~ and ..... Up)MI rn,. N
\lINe ..., IIort ~ ..., ".. 10 prtMØt .. tI'IOII CUI'M n .:x:uw
~poeIIbII.l..nat~b....lIgIIyl:*dlgdrxu'IWIL
¡IT
James & laura Vardalis
This pattern indicates subject parcel
This pattern indicates City of Port Sf. Lucie
Map prepared Januaty 26, 2004
nwe map has been oompIIðd faQllrMltøl~ and I1:IIeIWiœ ~ tny. N
Wt1iI& ~eftorttds bait! I'rVIdø to ¡:II'OIride 1fw.¡ moetCtJtl'entand &CCI.If1Iþj
~~itilíJ'\Ol:lriIend8dloruøøaa.!e:gilllyblndli'!gdooumart\. .
'-'
""'"
!!IGlilill~II~II! !KI8IHil!IB~r~"ij!.pØli'fiPß!i !
r 0 f I;! .. . II' u ~ í I 2"~G 11i ~·U "f-p' i ~ HIli
~i'h; ! ¡ IßP¡igll~r.~'d~ ~i;~*I!III~tiRh!,1 :
IIJ~ I~ P ~ ~K fil~11 ~.Inl G !li~~~d~IJn ¡
~ " Ii ! I i! It¡ ë¡ ii II II,q; 1~5;&~~ ì~ '. ;1 ¡f:ìir.I r: II ¡ I Ii If! }
~ !al ~ ~ii II; Ii I if I i ~!~=I·E;lIäl &1 II ;11i~!i~i d r' I ~ - I: I~
~ J if ii; ¡ i ill! Pi r.~~~š;. ~I· ;1 r..f~li~ Hi II P~i ~
I, !:I I Ii ¡o, ! i r!, 'II~ a III !,;. I Ii ; i 'i I
H ~;~I- !! II . ft ¡ i Ii I! I~~'I~I"! i ~ ~i¡li~ 1 it q ~ Ii
it 1= Ie !i, it ~ fILl 'ill ~:Ë .I~ Ii IB'I. ~I I,;. I Ii ~
II _ 1:1 Iii & ~ ¡I: :~~!;I t-=.ISi i I pi ~
-0 _ I-! Ii I ~ I I ~I,~g¡!!¡ L~ ¡J ! Ie ~
u:; .; ¡= v.þ ¡ f J I ¡i Q!I'~. · & ., I!:'= §! ~:!
! ~: II I." I I II .:&' r ,,~
. S f ~ "
~
Iii! 'nl li·f e!JlI~!:g!:li:! I;!HI;'I'~ fl J P¡~! II (~III!!lJ!III~' I ~ 11~
1('1 Ijlj ;1 i i!11 ~iII!!; ilii~'I II; !I~J~i I !. lti ! · ¡'~;:;:~i!l~II!b¡l íi~ I! ~!~
i i Iii; Ù r ii ~¡5Iìi q~~i:2Iel tli ~I!!II ¡rid f~!i 1 ; !'~,!Irlged i~ Ii; II!
I' 'If t ~ã!il ~1~!!i:C "'.. 1111i· JI~ if r ~ II~~ I ~ I i UUII::. !f;!~~ *~:: ill II ~
It:' " Þ~I ï=fi~¡' ; ¥~I' Ii' ~ i .G 01 ~ ~ . :=;:¡¡~t.!!¡¡¡i~ ;¡. "Iii
l~' ~ !. I ~¡f a 111.,;~i . ~;& ,!is ~ E ; I !I!!I~ ! ~~!liQi! '!; I
!Íi ¡,i ~; i.~,1i: Li!i~;' ! hfgl I r !~~~iif Þ ; ~
J~11· ;~9 11¡;aDli¡l¡ ~1~t!;;III. I stilll I s =M....=~~lirsi ë1i! ~ . ~
J. .( I'I! I¡i~i'¡ 1¡:~i;i·;I ill !,. s;; I . !l'!iØpI"~!II_ II i ~
!~I I!,; ~¡æ~~;I:! 1~~5it~11 ~ ;t:ol:: :IIHiIQICil:JJh ~& ¡ S<
,... ...... ~
~
..".i
BOARD OF
COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
February 2, 2004
In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that JAMES
AND LAURA VARDALIS have petitioned St. Lucie County for a Variance from the Provisions of
Section 6.02.3(B)(2)(a)(2) to permit the continued use of a deck on property located adjacent to the North
Fork of the St. Lucie River for the following described property:
Location:
6414 Riverland Drive.
THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AILABLE UPON REQUEST
The public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on February
17, 2004, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex, 2300
Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at
that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County
Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least 3 days
prior to a scheduled hearing.
County policy discourages communication with individual County Commissioners on any case outside of the
scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or provide written comments for the record.
The proceedings of the County Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any
decision made by the County Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,
he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of
the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn
in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying
during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie
County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-
1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new
owner. Please call (772) 462-2526 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number BCC-04-001.
Sincerely,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
?~ ~ I~
Paula Lewis, Chair
JOHN D. ßRUHN, District No, 1 . DOUG COWARD, District No, 2 . PAULA A, LEWIS, District No, J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No, 4 . CLIFF ßARNES, District No, 5
County Administrotor - Douglos M, Anderson
2.300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL .34982-5652
Administrotion: (772) 462-1590 · Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GIS/Technical Services: (772) 462-155.3
Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 . Fax: (772) 462-1581
Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 · Fax: (772) 462-21.32
www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us
~
'-"
....
z~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~§ I ~
(RCD gg
ra Ii å-. -. -. II -. -. II -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. -. ~ t;t; £~ ~~ e
:D ~~ ~I ~~ §§ ~~ §§ 88 §§
§~ to) 1\)1\) ....~ :II:
00 8 §§
.... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... 8§ U ~
§~ ~~ 1\)1\) ~~ .... .... ~
~~ .....1\) §§ ~§ ~~ ~~ gg §
§§ ~
<OC1I ......... to) <0 I\)C1I C1II\) to)-. 00 ~8 -. to) CD
CC IJI-I g? IJI-I ~~ ~ -1-1 ð'~ :DC/) "tJ <:I: "tJ g? :I::D "tJ :D ^ ~ ^ <C/) 00 "TI g? t'"
meo ::!. Ciï 0= =5' eo 1\1 'ª- eo 0 0 c eo 'ª. g ~ eo eo ... 1\1 1\1 a ~
"tJ::! := -- r c 3 33 3 3 3 iila =3 e!.8. ~ r ¡j¡Q: ¡¡¡ ::! 1\1 r iiIiiI 3 r ...
::! 0 C ~I\I 1\1 1\1 1\1 ::!I!!. 1\1 0 ~ c ~ ::! -c ::! ::J C Z
Ciï ::J 0 eo ::J ::! ::! ::! 1\1 1\1 0 ",eo :::r eo 12. a.a. 0' 0
~ 1iï ::! '" Ciï ::! ¡¡¡- CD ~ eo eo ¡¡¡. ~
p ~ c.. c.. ~ ~~ a a a
b> ... ... 0 b> b>
b> 0
c c c
~ ~ c ~
3. ~
0
'"
~ m ~ 00 0 0 0 ~ "tJ c.. c.. zc.. :D ~ c.. :DS:: c.. "tJ:D c.. :D :D IJI IJI~ ~
~ iiIiiI iiI iiI iiI eo 1\1 eo _. 1\1 1\1 ~ o=: 1\1 !!!.eo 0 0 1\1 ëi! ëi!
~ 3 ::t iii~ ::J g~ ~ :::r g ::J
ill ilï c c c c c ilï ~ ill '" ::!- >< ::! ::! ::! ::!
eo a.a. a. a. a. eo :D ~ 0 ~ a. ß":IE
3 ::! 3 CD eo eo eo CD 3 0 '" ~ 3 ::\.a. ill 0 ::\. 1\1
eo
:I:C/) IJIO 0 0 0 Ci) c.. C/) :I: "TIs:: ~
IJI ~ -I < "TI~ :I:"TI :I: "TI ^ ~ ^ ~ "TI ~
::!. :::r 1\1 a §J c a ~ eo a
:= 0 a 3 1\1 ::! ::! 1\1
0 3 I!!. O'ø eo 3 ¡¡¡ ::! ø 3 I
::! 1\1 0' '" 0' :::r CD 0'
'" ¡¡ï CD CD eo CD ~ CD
a a a a
c..1JI :II ¡;; :Ilc/) 5:::II C :II s:: C/) b'g? :D ~
£1\1 1\1 :::r:::r =:::r 0 :::r ~ :::r :::r
¡¡¡- a- 0 c g ~. C/)g ::! 0 1\1 ::!- eo 0
::! 1\1 :::r ii1 ::! ::! a » ::!. ::!
¡j¡ ii1 1\1 c.. 1\1 1\1 1\1 1\1 c.. ::! 1\1
~ C/) C/) c.. C/) c C/)
» c.. ::J r
eo
"tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ ~
e!. I!!. I!!. I!!.
iiI iiI iiI iiI
a a a a ~
[
c.. c.. c.. c.. ~
0 0 0 0
'" '" '" IJ>
~ ~ ~ ~
:::r :::r :::r :::r
C/) r r r
.... .... :!:; to) I\) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "tJ <0 ~ .... ~ .... .... ~ I\) ~ .... I\) ~ C» ~ .... .... I\) !¡ !¡ I\) 1\»
~ <0 ..... to) 0 <0 g ~ ~ 8 <0 0 ~ to) ~ to) 0 to)Q.
0 0 C1I 8 ~ œ œ œ œ œ <0 00 ~ ~ I\) ~ ~ 8 ~ 8=t
to) to) :IE CD g' IJI C/) <0 -. :I: -. ..... I\) 0> <0 :II :II
C/) C/) IJI < :II :II :II :II :II :II :II ~ "tJ "tJ < c ~ s:: s:: » :IE "tJ < ~ ~ :$; ~
::!. m ::!
m eo eo 'ª: ~- <- ~. ~. ~. ~- ~. >< 0 IJI 1\1 1\1 IJI ª: CD IJI ii3 1\1 'ª: IJI
~ e¡ !!!. .... '" 0 ~ Ciï ~ ~ ~- '" iii' ~ eo :::r ~ iiI iiI iii' 9.
eo 0 ~ g ¡
~ :::r ::J ::1 ::1 ::1 ::1 ::1 ::1 ::1 ~ ~ 1\1 ~ ~ iiI iiI ::! eo 3 ~ iiI ::! :II :II ~ ::!
:::r 0 eo ¡¡¡. 1\1 1\1 1\1 1\1 1\1 1\1 1\1 3 ¡¡¡. :IE ¡¡¡- ¡¡¡-
3 a- ~ IJI ::J ::J ª' IJI IJI :::r 0 ::! 0 0
g? ëi! ::! ::! ::J ::J ::J ::! ::J ;:ï a. a. a. CD eo 0 a. '" '"
ª CD eo ~ a. a. a. a. a. a. a. ~ 0 ::! ~ ~ ::! eo 1\1 ~ 1\1 1\1 ::! »
IJI eo IJI IJI eo CD CD CD '" IJI eo éS
C/) '" eo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g? ë: ë:
5_ :II ~ g? ð: IJI ð: ð: IJI IJI ~ ~ r ð: IJI
~ Q ð: ð: ð: ::J 1\1 1\1 ð:
¡;j C :II: 0' 0'
C/) I\) :II: C» C/) ~ C/) ~ ~ C/)
¡;j 8 C1I 0 ¡j¡' ¡j¡'
<0 CD ¡;j ¡;j ¡;j
0 C1I C1I C1I '" "'C1I
N 0 0 0 0
0 C1I C1I C1I C1I
.....
"tJ "TI ër ër "TI ër "TI "TI "TI "TI ër ër ër s:: "tJ "TI » ër ër ~ "TI "tJ ër s:: "TI "TI "TI ër ër "TI "TI "TI » "TI~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¡¡¡. 0 0 éS 0 !!¡ ¡¡¡. 0 0 0 0 0 0 < o ..
::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. ::\. CD ::\.~
2. ::! ::! ::!. 2. ::J
g? "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ g] "tJ ï: "tJ "tJ ï: "tJ ::J "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ ï: "tJ
¡¡¡- ¡¡¡- ¡¡¡- ¡¡¡. ¡¡¡. ¡¡¡. ¡¡¡. 1iï 1iï CD' ¡¡¡- ¡¡¡. ¡¡¡. ¡¡¡- ¡¡¡. ¡¡¡. eo ¡¡¡- ¡¡¡. ¡¡¡. ¡¡¡. ¡¡¡- ¡¡¡- ¡¡¡- ¡¡¡. ¡¡¡. CD'
r Ò Ò Ò Ò Ò ~ Ò ~ ~ ~ ~ Ò r ~ ii1 Ò Ò ii1 Ò ~ ~ ò ò ~ ~ ~ ò ò Ò ii1 ~
c c
12. CD CD CD eo eo eo CD 12. CD CD eo ¡j¡' CD eo CD CD CD
eo eo
"TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI Z "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI "TI ~
r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r r c.. r r r r r r r r r r r r
¡o
to) to) to) to) to) to) to) ~ to) ~ to) to) to) to) (,.) (,.) ~ (,.) to) 0 (,.) (,.) (,.) (,.) (,.) (,.) (,.) (,.) (,.) (,.) (,.) (,.) ~
..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ~ ..... ..... ~ ..... ~ ..... ~ ..... ~ ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ~ .....
<0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 ~ <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 co co co co <0 <0 co
~ CD ~ ~ ~ CD CD CD CD CD ~ C1I CD ~ CD CD CD CD ~ ~ ~ CD CD CD CD CD CD ~ CD CD
I\) I\) I\) I\) I\) I\) <0 I\) I\) I\) I\) ~ I\) C1I I\) I\) I\) I\) I\) I\) ~ I\)
(,.) (,.) ~ w 0, .:,¡ .:,¡ .:,¡ .:,¡ .:,¡ .:,¡ .:,¡ ~ .:,¡ .:,¡ ~ 0, .:,¡ .:,¡ .:,¡ .:,¡ 8 8 0,
..... ..... I\) ~ ~ ~ t t t t t 0> ~ C» ..... ~ ..... C» ~ ~ C» ..... C»
<0 'f ~ 0> ~ ~ <0 0 8 I\) <0 8 0 0 (,.)
C1I (,.) I\) ..... ..... 0 C1I 0 I\) C» C» C» 0 0 0 0 I\)
I\) -.
a::1::;
æ. .a
=!
Ii a
t"'..
/j;' =
... ...
a-s,
., ~
=0
H§
i§
8~
:-'I::;
.....
ä ~
!j¡.§
P:o~
t"'=
II> ...
= '
., ~
II>~
~~
Q.'C;
!.::-
;j. ¡;.
S'
[
~.
=
rIJ
¡
5!
...
II>
ë
II>
~
~
~..;
~
~
~
""'"
.,.
.-
Agenda Request
Item Number
Date:
---
66-
02/17/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
SUBJECT:
Consider the continuation of the applicati®--e Glassman Holdings, LLC for a
Change to the Future Land Use Map of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive
Plan until March 16, 2004.
Glassman Holdings, LLC, proposes a change in Future Land Use classification
from RE (Residential Estate - 2 du/ac) to RU (Residential Urban - 5 du/ac) and
movement of the Urban Service Boundary Line approximately 1,050 feet to the
west to incorporate the parcel (File No: PA-03-002). The 47.96 acre site is
located northwest of the intersection of Indrio Road and Emerson Avenue in the
area currently under review as part of the North County Charrette.
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
BACKGROUND:
The amendment site's existing future land use designation allows for residential
uses at 2 dwelling units per acre or a total of 96 dwelling units. The proposed
change to RU would allow a maximum of 5 dwelling units per acre or 240 total
dwelling units. The applicant stated intent is to develop the property with 140
single-family homes, which would result in an overall density of almost 3
dwelling units per acre.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
At the June 19, 2003, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County
Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 5 to 3, recommended denial of
the requested change in future land use classification from the RE
(Residential Estate) and RU (Residential Urban).
RECOMMENDATION:
On September 2, 2003, the Commission tabled the consideration of the
transmittal of an amendment until February 17, 2004.
Continue the application of Glassman Holdings, LLC, for a change in Future
Land Use classification from RE (Residential, Estate) to RU (Residential,
Urban) until M~rch 16,2004.
COMMISSION ACTION:
[XJ APPROVED
c::J OTHER
o DENIED
Approved 5-0
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
~_.Jrdinationl Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
\.t
""'"
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
County Commissioners
David Kelly, Planning Manager çf!.-
January 28, 2004
DATE:
SUBJECT:
Glassman Holdings, LLC/Petition for a Change in Future Land Use
On September 2, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners tabled action on the above petition until
February 17, 2004. The purpose of this action was to obtain results of the North County Charrette before
acting on a petition within the Indrio Road corridor. The subject property is located northwest of the Indrio
Road and Emerson Avenue intersection.
The North County Charrette is scheduled to begin on February 7,2004 with a presentation to the public
on February 13, 2004. A final presentation to the Commissioners will follow. At this time staff
recommends continuing this petition until the March 16, 2004 Board of County Commissioners meeting.
If you have any questions regarding this petition please let us know.
Cc: County Administrator
County Attorney
Community Development Director
File
Comm. Lewis - No
Staff recommendation Approved
5-0
,
'-'
To:
Submitted By:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
COMMISSION ACTION:
[:ïlJ APPROVED
r-l OTHER
Motion to object (Failed 3-2)
Comm, Bruhn - No
Comll. Hutchinson - No
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
,
...
..",.¡
Agenda Request
!5-Þ{
02117/04
Item Number
Date:
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
Consider Draft Resolution 04-011 granting a Change in Zoning fro the RMH-5
(Residential, Mobile-Home - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning
District for property located at the northwest corner of the intersection of St. Lucie
Boulevard and Hammond Road.
The petitioner, John M. Dunn, has requested this change in zoning from the RMH-5
(Residential, Mobile-Home - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning
District on property located at 2835 Hammond Road, (the northwest corner of the
intersection of St. Lucie Boulevard and Hammond Road) in order to allow the property to
be utilized as a base of operations for his heavy equipment contract ring business. The
subject property is located to the west/southwest of the St. Lucie County International
Airport and north of property currently zoned and used for light industrial purposes.
N/A
At the January 15, 2004, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning
and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 2 (Mr. McCurdy and Mr. Lounds) with one
member (Mr. Akins) absent, recommended denial of the requested change in zoning to
the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District.
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-011.
D DENIED
ENCE:
/k
Comm. Barnes - No
Comm. Coward - No
Coordination! Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
~
,.
'-"
...,I
Commission Review: February 17, 2004
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division
MEMORANDUM
TO: County Commission
FROM: Community Development Director
DATE: February 11, 2004
SUBJECT: Application of John M. Dunn, for a Change in Zoning from the RMH-5
(Residential, Mobile-Home - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial,
Light) Zoning District. (File No.: RZ-03-046)
LOCATION: 2835 Hammond Road, (the northwest corner of the
intersection of St. Lucie Boulevard and Hammond Road.)
EXISTING ZONING: RMH-5 (Residential, Mobile-Home - 5 du/acre)
PROPOSED ZONING:
IL (Industrial, Light)
FUTURE LAND USE:
MXD - Airport (Mixed Use - Airport)
PARCEL SIZE:
PROPOSED USE:
2.76 acres
Underground Utilities Contractor's Business Office and
Equipment Storage Yard
PERMITTED USES:
Attachment "A" - Section 3.01.03(T) IL (Industrial, Light) -
identifies those uses which are permitted by right,
permitted as an accessory use, or permitted through the
conditional use process. Any use designated as a
"Conditional Use" is required to undergo further review and
approvals. Any use not found within the zoning district
regulations are considered to be prohibited uses for that
district.
SURROUNDING ZONING:
RMH-5 is located to the north. CG (Commercial, General)
Zoning is located to the west. U (Utilities) Zoning is
located to the east. IL (Industrial, Light) is located to the
south across St. Lucie Boulevard.
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
Generally the existing uses of land surrounding the
property are residential to the north/northwest, industrial to
'-'
..."
February 11 , 2004
Page 2
Subject: John M. Dunn
File No.: RZ-03-046
the south, and the St. Lucie County International Airport to
the east. A single-family residence is located to the west.
The Future Land Use Classification of the surrounding
area is MXD (Mixed Use Airport) to the north, south, and
west. T/U (Transportation/Utilities) is located to the east.
FIRE/EMS PROTECTION:
Station #4 (4000 St. Lucie Boulevard), is located
approximately 1 mile to the east.
UTILITY SERVICE:
The subject property is in the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority
(FPUA) service area. FPUA utility lines are adjacent to the
subject parcel.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
RIGHT-OF-WAY
ADEQUACY:
The existing right-of-way along St. Lucie Boulevard is 80
feet. The existing right-of-way for Hammond Road is 60
feet.
SCHEDULED
IMPROVEMENTS:
TYPE OF CONCURRENCY
DOCUMENT REQUIRED:
None.
Concurrency Deferral Affidavit.
*********************************************************************
STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall
consider and make the following determinations:
1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the
51. Lucie County Land Development Code;
The requested zoning district, (IL) has been determined to be consistent with the St. Lucie
County Land Development Code and has met the standards of 11.06.03 of his code. The IL
zoning designation is a permitted zoning designation within the MXD - Airport Future Land Use
designation.
2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the 51. Lucie
County Comprehensive Plan;
'-'
"WI
February 11,2004
Page 3
Subject: John M. Dunn
File No.: RZ-03-046
The proposed change in zoning is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County
Comprehensive Plan. The request is compatible with the MXD - Airport (Mixed Use - Airport)
Future Land Use classification, which designates the subject property for commercial/industrial
uses.
In addition to the other general policies guiding new development activities in the
community, Policy 1.1.11.3, of the Future Land Use Element of the County's
Comprehensive Plan specifically addresses the criteria to be used in determining the
suitability of any new property designations as Light Industrial. These criteria are:
1. Light Industrial property should have available to it central water services
necessary for both domestic and fire protection purposes.
There are existing FPUA water mains adjacent to the subject site (Hammond
Road) Utility seNices can be extended to this site with little effort.
2. New Light Industrial property should not be located within 500 feet of any Aquatic
Preserve or other specially designated aquatic habitat or a Category I Wetlands
as described in Policy 8. 1. 14. 1.
The subject site is not located within within 500 feet of any Aquatic PreseNe or
other specially designated aquatic habitat or a Category I Wetlands as described
in Policy 8.1 .14.1 of the County's Comprehensive Plan.
3. New Light Industrial areas should have immediate access to the regional
transportation network.
The subject site adjoins St. lucie Boulevard, which is a designated Minor Arterial
under the County's Transportation Plans
4. New Light Industrial property should have a minimum lot size of one (1) acre.
The subject site is 2.76 acres in total area.
3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the
existing and proposed land uses;
The proposed IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning is consistent with the other existing industrial uses in
the area. The St. Lucie County International Airport is located to the east across Hammond
Road. This airport is a commercial airport operation, which includes aviation manufacturing
facilities and activities located on-site. The MXD - Airport Future Land Use Classification
designates the subject property for commerciaVindustrial uses in anticipation of expanded
operations at the airport with the specific intent of discouraging long-term residential
development activities that may be incompatible with the activities at the Airport.
'-"
.~
February 11, 2004
Page 4
Subject: John M. Dunn
Fife No.: RZ-03-046
4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment;
As a result of expanded non-residential development activity in the area and operations at the
airport, the redesignation of this parcel to an Industrial use is considered to be consistent with
the surrounding area. The current zoning designation of RMH-5 was applied to this property in
1984 as part of a County wide rezoning activity and was recognized the time as an interim use
of the property. As designated by the County's Land Use Plan, the long term use of this
property is not to be residential, but rather some type of activity that would be compatible with
the operations at the St. Lucie County International Airport.
In the specific instance of this requested change in zoning, the petitioners have indicated that
they intend to run an equipment storage facility associated with their local contracting business.
This type of activity is would be considered to be consistent with the type of expected activities
around the airport proper.
5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed
amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited
to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools,
solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities;
The intended use for this rezoning is not expected to create significant additional demands on
public facilities in this area. Any development activity on this site will need to demonstrate that
there are adequate public facilities in the area to support the requested operation or activity.
6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
significant adverse impacts on the natural environment;
The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural
environment. Any development will be required to comply with all state and local environmental
regulations. The subject property is the location of an old, abandoned home. Any additional
construction on-site would require the application of a vegetation removal permit.
7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an
orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of
such patterns;
The proposed amendment would ultimately result in an orderly and logical development pattern.
The subject property is located in an area of light industrial and aviation uses. The current
designation for residential use is not compatible with these uses and designations.
8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest,
and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code;
The proposed amendment is not in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the
purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and Comprehensive Plan.
'-'
'-J
February 11, 2004
Page 5
Subject: John M. Dunn
File No.: RZ-03-046
The surrounding area is considered commercial/industrial for any future development. The
existing residential neighborhood to the north can be adequately buffered from the application of
the County's land Development standards regarding such activities.
COMMENTS
The petitioner, John M. Dunn, has requested this change in zoning from the RMH-5
(Residential, Mobile-Home - 5 dulacre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District
on property located at 2835 Hammond Road, (the northwest corner of the intersection of St.
Lucie Boulevard and Hammond Road) in order to allow the property to be utilized as a base of
operations for his heavy equipment contract ring business. The subject property is located to
the west/southwest of the St. Lucie County International Airport and north of property currently
zoned and used for light industrial purposes.
At the January 15, 2004, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and
Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 2 (Mr. McCurdy and Mr. Lounds) with one member (Mr.
Akins) absent, recommended denial of the requested change in zoning from the RMH-5
(Residential, Mobile-Home - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning
District.
Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms to the standards of review as
set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in
conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan.
Staff recommends that the Board approve the petition for a change in zoning from the RMH-5
(Residential, Mobile-Home - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning
District.
Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 04-011, which, if approved, would grant a change in
zoning from the RMH-5 (Residential, Mobile-Home - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL
(Industrial, Light) Zoning District.
SUBMITTED:
Director
cc: County Administrator
County Attorney
Planning Manager
John M. Dunn
File
'-"
...,/
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
RESOLUTION 04-011
FILE NO.: RZ-03-G46
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM
THE RMH-5 (RESIDENTIAL, MOBilE-HOME -<SPlJ/ACRE)
ZONING DISTRICT TO THE Il (INDUSTJ=lI~l, llGIj"1") ZONING
DISTRICT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY INiST. lUÇIECOl)NTV,
FLORIDA
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of StLuciEtCounty, Florida, bÇl~êdÒn the
testimony and evidence, including, but not limited to the~tél.ffteport, has made the following
determinations:
1. John M. Dunn. presented a petition for a change in zoning frol1'1thEîHMH-5 (Residential,
Mobile-Home- 5 du/acre) Zoning District to.thElI4l!l1dustrial,List1t)Zoning District for the
property depicted on the attached mapSÇlsE~t1ibit'iA" and described below.
2. On January 15, 2004, the St. Luci.eCount}1rlal1nin~äºg.~oning Commission held a
public hearing on the petition, aftElr publishing notice!1lHeast 10 days prior to the hearing
and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and
recommended that the Board.of CountyCommissi(jners deny a change in zoning from
the RMH-5 (Residential, Mpbile-Horne-5 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial,
Light) Zoning District
3. O~FElþruary 17, 20q4;t~i~E3oard held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing
notice at least 10 days priq(tC)Jhe hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property
within 50 e(of the subjeèfproperty.
4. The pr9PÞ~Ø(jpt1än~e in zol1ing has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of
the ... St. Lucie ·CC)ypty<hand Development Code and is consistent with the goals,
oqjêctives, and pÒIICiê$Þfthe St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan.
5. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the existing and proposed use of
property in the surrounding area.
NO\IV,THEREFORI;}BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
Cöþnty, Fløriça:
A. The proposed Change in the Zoning District Classification from the RMH-5 (Residential,
Mobile-Home- 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District for
that property depicted on the attached maps as Exhibit "A" and described as follows:
File No.: RZ-03-046
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-011
Page 1
..
\...t
...,I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40EAST. THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2
OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 - LESS THE WEST 907.94 FEET AND
LESS CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY. (Tax ID#: 1430-344-0026-000/9)
(Location:
Northwest corner of the intersection of St. Lucie Boulevard and
Hammond Road)
owned by Alvin Sapp, is hereby approved.
B. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hØrØbýtiuthorized and
directed to cause the change to be made on the OffiCial ZoningMåp ()fS~.Lt.Jcie County,
Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption oftt)isre$Qluticm.
Þ H - ':)te on this resolution
'-'..-..........
-'.._::::' ,\. Lewis
in D. Bruhn
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson
Commissioner Doug Coward
xxx
Commissioner Cliff Barnes
xxx
PASSED
DULY
1 ¡th Day of February 2004.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY
Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND CORRECTNESS:
Deputy Clerk
County Attorney
hf
H:\WORD\Petitions\BCC\Finished.04\Dunn.RZ\DunnRES.doc
File No.: RZ-03-046
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-011
Page 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 .
9 .
10
11
12
13
14
15
\wt
...,1
Exhibit .4
Magt§
General LQêatiqn Maþ
Area Su~Jectto thE}fChange in
ZoniQg
File No.: RZ-03-046
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-011
Page 3
~ UtWfICIAL-
SUBJECT TO
PLANNiNG & ZON1NG
AGENDA ITEM 4: JOHN M. DUNN - FILE NO. RZ-03-046: COMMiSSION APPROVAl
Mr. Hank Flores, presenting Staff comments, stated that Agenda Item # 4 was the
application of John M. Dunn, for a Change in Zoning from the RMH-5 (Residential,
MobiJe-Home - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District for
property located at 2835 Hammond Road, the northwest comer of the intersection of St.
Lucie Boulevard and Hammond Road. Mr. Dunn is proposing to operate a Heavy
Equipment Contractor's Office from the subject property.
Mr. Flores stated that RMH-5 zoning is located to the north, CG (Commercial, General)
Zoning is located to the west, U (Utilities) Zoning is located to the east, and IL
(Industrial, Light) Zoning is located to the south across St. Lucie Boulevard. He
continued that the subject property is located to the west of the St. Lucie County
International and north of property zoned and used for light industrial purposes. The
surrounding area is considered commercial/industrial for any future development. The
existing residentia] neighborhood to the north can be adequately buffered from the
proposed construction office by the provision of an 8-foot high fence or wall and
associated landscaping between the subject property and the residential community to the
north.
Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms to the standards of
review as set forth in the Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the
Comprehensive Plan. Staff is recommending that you forward this petition to the Board
of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval.
Chairman McCurdy questioned if the applicant was present. Mr. John M. Dunn, 3981
Alice Street, stated that he was the applicant and proposed to use the property for offices
and storage of his equipment. He stated that he is a licensed master plumber.
Mr. Merritt questioned if the applicant wou]d be working on the equipment while it is
stored on the property. Mr. Dunn stated that he was only planning on parking the
equipment there during the evening.
Mr. Hearn questioned if the applicant, Mr. Dunn, was the owner. Mr. Dunn stated that he
does not currently own the property.
Mr. Loundsquestioned what type of equipment the applicant would be storing on the
property. Mr. Dunn stated that he would have a 325 Catt, 950 Loader, Lo-Boy, Tractor
Trailer, Bobcat, and Skid Loader. Mr. Lounds questioned if there wou]d be any cranes
on the property. Mr. Dunn stated there would not. He also stated that there is currently a
three-bedroom house located on the property, which will remain, and he will use as an
office space.
Ms. Morgan questioned what times the applicant would be moving the equipment on and
off the property. Mr. Dunn stated that they would usually start moving it around 7 A.M
P&Z / LPA Regular Meeting
January 15, 2004
Page 6 of 18
\w'
U:JFFICIAL-
SUBJECT TO
PlANNING & lONINI
COMMiSSION APPROVAl
He stated that they usually work from just after
and would usually finish about 5 P.M.
sunrise until just before sunset.
Mr. Grande questioned how Mr. Dunn could apply for a rezoning if he doesn't own the
property. Ms. Young stated that it is allowed as long as the property's current owner
signed off on the application and allowed Mr. Dunn to be their agent. Mr. Dunn stated
that the current property owner was present at the hearing as well.
Ms. Hammer stated that she was concerned about the hours of operation, especially since
most machines have the caution alarms sounding when they are backing up. Mr. Dunn
stated that would not be the case because most of the equipment is actually already on the
trailer and they would only be moving the trailers in and out of the area.
Mr. Hearn questioned if the property owners are sent a copy of the permitted uses
allowed under the IL (Industrial, Light) zoning when they are notified. Mr. Flores stated
they are not sent that info, but it is available in the file for the public to review at any
time.
Mr. Merritt questioned the concurrency for the road and how staff couJd recommend
approval of a rezoning on Kings Highway. Mr. Kelly stated that this project is a distance
off of Kings Highway, near the Airport. Mr. Murphy stated that concurrency
requirements are required until a specific plan is submitted and this request is for a
preliminary rezoning only.
Mr. Grande questioned what requirements are necessary for this project as a buffer
between it and the residences to the north. Mr. Flores stated that some landscaping and
an 8-foot opaque fence would be required. Mr. Lounds questioned if they should
consider requiring landscaping on Airport Road. Mr. Hearn stated that he didn't believe
they could impose conditions on a rezoning. Ms. Young confirmed that was correct, they
couldn't impose conditions on a rezoning.
Chairman McCurdy opened the public hearing.
Ms. Jean DireJy, 5138 Margaret Ann Lane, stated that she had a letter prepared by the
property owners to the north, with forty-three signatures, stating that they were adamantly
against this change in zoning. She continued that it is not compatibJe with the adjoining
properties because of noise, industrial odors, and the appearance of the heavy equipment.
She stated that they feel this should be considered to be spot zoning. Mr. Flores stated
that it wasn't considered to be spot zoning because the Comprehensive Plan designates
the area for commercial or industrial, light uses. He continued that there is also
industrial, light zoning to south across St. Lucie Boulevard. She also stated that one of
their many concerns is about what this type of project will do to their property taxes and
if it would cause them to increase. Mr. Flores stated that he didn't believe it would
increase their taxes, but that is handled by the Property Appraiser's office. She
questioned why there were some people who live near her who did not receive
notifications. Mr. Grande stated that the notification is 500 feet and is possible that
P&Z I LPA Regular Meeting
January 15,2004
Page 7 of 18
Url1JflClAL-
SUB1réT TO
PLANNING & ZONINQ
COMMiSSION APPROVAL
people who reside on the western end of Margaret Ann Lane would be outside of the 500-
foot boundary. Mr. Flores stated that was correct and that there is aJso a large sign on the
property for notification too.
~
Ms. Jean Brennan, 5041 Margaret Ann Lane, stated that they are part of the Green Acres
subdivision and has lived there for seventeen years. She continued that this mobile home
park is real property because they own the land individually. She also stated that on the
original plat maps it stated this area should not be used for schools, churches, or
residential because of the noise factors from the airport. She continued that this Jand was
subdivided into lots that are 75XlOO because a County Commissioner at the time bought
them, subdivided them, and got it approved. She stated that she isn't really too concerned
about Mr. Dunn's use of the property. She advised that she is concerned that there is
only one way to get into their subdivision, which is Hammond Road. She stated that in
case of emergencies it is tough to get everyone from their park out of the area with only
having one road.
Seeing no one else, Chairman McCurdy closed the public hearing.
Mr. Lounds stated that there is heavy traffic on Hammond Road from Airport Road and
feels that area needs some sort of traffic impact review.
Mr. Hearn questioned if uses of the property would have been more clearly defined by
using a PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development). Mr. Flores confirmed that
having a PNRD (Planned Non-Residential DeveJopment) request does allow for a
restriction of uses in the conditions of approval.
Ms. Morgan stated that the requirement for an 8-foot fence concerns her because of the
type of equipment the applicant will be storing on the property. She also stated that the
permitted uses under IL (Industrial, Light) zoning are also a concern.
Ms. Hammer stated that she too is concerned about the permitted uses under the IL
(Industrial, Light) zoning and feels there should be some sort of time restriction on this
request.
Mr. Grande stated that he would hope staff is suggesting the alternatives a petitioner has,
like a PNRD (PJanned Non-Residential Development), instead of a flat rezoning request.
He continued that a PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) request would allow
them to see what the plan was for the property and also to address any concerns about
traffic or landscaping.
Mr. Hearn stated that after considering the testimony presented during the public
hearing, including Staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in
Section 11.06.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the
Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of
County Commissioners deny the application of John M. Dunn, for a Change in
Zoning from the RMH-5 (Residential, Mobile Home - 5 dulacre) Zoning District to
P&Z / LP A Regular Meeting
January 15, 2004
Page 8 of 18
~OFFICIAL-
SUBJECT TO'
PLANNING & la_
the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District because I feel it is fundam~IM.'~~~~n~~~ROVAl
change property that is zoned residential, adjoining other residential property that
there are homes on, and I also want to point out that there are other methods that
this particular could have taken place with more safeguards in place and even
though I shar.e Mr. Lounds' concern about the landscaping and his pointing out that
we have an eight foot high fence that doesn't stop odors, that doesn't stop very much
of the noise, and I also want to point out that there is no limitations on hours of
operation in an Industrial zoning.
......
Motion seconded by Ms. Morgan.
Upon a roll call vote the motion was approved with a vote of 6-2 (with Mr. Lounds
and Chairman McCurdy voting against) and forwarded to the Board of County
Commissioners with a recommendation of denial.
P&Z / LPA Regular Meeting
January 15, 2004
Page 9 of 18
~ I ~: .;I~~~&§nli~~ . J '" :111:1&: ~ li!-I!I~~~i =I=i~!!~ ~i¡1 i I;Î
-I h ;4r~·r~ij"" ~ I: a'iq ~!irr;a r!asr1H!:, It ~il
~ I ! ;!Lilli!!!!! Ji II Ii. ¡t' ~'trl: ~~;IHili~ Ii fü
1 J ~I¡;~ 0: c·:a'IIDn ~ rIa.. : .1 II xli~11 ,tle::I:!'§ ~I ·
i ", i "illi"iik.iq"ii · r ! ~! .. . !".Ÿ!Î I I ~"lI~ I~I J ..,
~ ¡. ~I a~'1!~dli~i~ iii ~il: r~C!'! U il·~f.iide. 111!!i:i~ :ft¡ J, 1~
~ .. -li I i¡¡c:li~e~ iiiii, J f i ~ I!¡i 2 , , !l!Iii:l!ir ~ .. i,:ïJ!!;Š :r~' !:J~
~ ' :1 ~:I ~lti~:c=;¡!;I;;¡;=. ~ ;J. i j I!! !~&~ Jli ';!ili;~5Igi ~1·~I!~i!¡ I;!I' Ii J: :1
Iii ti~ _ lell I&&~~. l!5&!I&l!51!¡ ... I ~ f . fa.. =1. £ t ~;§I P.a :!
~II Iii ~~, i;iU!~nll ! Ilf ñ I niL:. i.! ~!~i.1 t¡~~ _~ ~ JI;I !
~H,I ~I ~~Þr~i1~~ ¡ 19 ii I ~1]ïll; 1._ :,.11 ll!ll ijlli~ i~ , Iii Jiil ~~
...11 ~ Iii I~C2!111!I!:ifl::!lIlI."II& 'I . a I !ël· rl~ · 4.!"" Iî<~~ 'i~i··':J·1 II·!i J It,. II JI
~I ÍI it I¡¡~!III :11111101 I ¡) ,i I ä e. ¡III Ii 11~~~IHi;aH ÎiI:Sdi:i! .gll . if ~·I II!Ø
" ¡. I'· II I iii ! i ! ~ li:V·
.1 i i I -li= Ii. ~ a 'ëalll l!f J R ' 51 ,I IS' =' ß
~i j d IW~; I! i I;!!¡~.!L~ f ¡¡ i ¡ p 11 ~ 71-
II f J! !I~I=·I I; I ~1i=1:l1= ~ I I Ii !I II :I I ~ I
JI I "II 111'11 ~I i :!!ilsÞl~ I I- .. I I -: å! I~ ß
If ¡ ! J L i ~,;~hl å - l~irll¡I;I~I= f ! III' i ~ III ii i I~¡ ii
I 1, i to: ) :1· .&~all~ Ii I j Ii~all !r I ø I I, I!i a~ g I I. "
¡~ ¡~ Iii )1 IH ~Ilid I! d I, !=!~~iih!~ j it Ii it! iI! Þ. ~! ~ I ~
iJ il -. ~. I~ ·.m~qi Bt ~'::a' =&1;1 II' f ~ It U ~ii' l!ï U
iJ III ¡ ql PI ~~! I! ·.'I'I.Ëii II ~f II fH~ - ~ W i ~ nil
, II i I J & !ilhii I~ ! ÞI!§I! IJ"I I. I' ~ J P. q 1:5 II i!i i !ir t ì
i )1 " ! t P. !lln1i1iig .1 ~ÞI·J i! Ii i I P. n I. Ii I (d I f
11:14 p ~HI is i~J!I~ ~ !siH!~11 i III! ¡j;1 It = ~ ;q · = f !!
.......
'..I
BOARD OF
COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
~~ ~eJ(:1 E -'"
COU NTY ~'~')¿"
FL. 0 RID A ,,;.....
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
February 2, 2004
In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that JOHN M.
DUNN has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from the RMH-5 (Residential, Mobile
Home - 5 dulacre) Zoning District to IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District for the following described
property:
Location:
Northwest corner of the intersection of St. Lucie Boulevard and Hammond
Road.
THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST
The second public hearing on the petition wül be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on
February 17, 2004, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex,
2300 Virginia Avenue, Fol1 Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard
at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The
County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least 3
days prior to a scheduled hearing.
County policy discourages communication with individual County Commissioners on any case outside of the
scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or provide written comments for the record.
The proceedings of the County Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any
decision made by the County Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,
he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of
the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn
in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying
during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie
County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-
1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new
owner. Please call (772) 462-1586 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number RZ-03-046.
Sincerely,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
'---P~A ~~'(A:~!~~
Paula Lewis, Chair
JOHN D. ßRUHN, District No, 1 . DOUG COWARD, District No, 2 . PAULA A. LEWIS, District No, J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No, 4 . CLIFF ßARNES, District No, 5
County Administrator - Douglas M, Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652
Administration: (772) 462-1590 · Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GIS/fechnical Services: (772) 462-1553
Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 · Fax: (772) 462-1581
Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 · Fax: (772) 462-2132
www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us
~
'-"
>
Planning and Zoning Commission Review: 01/15/04
File Number RZ-03-046
MEMORANDUM
DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO: Planning and Zoning Commission
FROM: Planning Manager WL
DATE: January 8, 2004
SUBJECT: Application of John M. Dunn, for a Change in Zoning from the RMH-5
(Residential, Mobile-Home - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial,
Light) Zoning District.
LOCATION: 2835 Hammond Road, the northwest corner of the
intersection of St. Lucie Boulevard and Hammond Road.
EXISTING ZONING: RMH-5 (Residential, Mobile-Home - 5 du/acre)
PROPOSED ZONING:
IL (Industrial, Light)
FUTURE LAND USE:
MXD - Airport (Mixed Use - Airport)
PARCEL SIZE:
2.76 acres
PROPOSED USE:
Heavy Equipment Contractor's Business Office
PERMITTED USES:
Attachment "A" - Section 3.01.03(T) IL (Industrial, Light) -
contains the designated uses, which are permitted by right,
permitted as an accessory use, or permitted through the
conditional use process. Any use designated as a
"Conditional Use" is required to undergo further review and
approvals. Any use not found within the zoning district
regulations are designated as prohibited uses for that
district.
SURROUNDING ZONING:
RMH-5 is located to the north. CG (Commercial, General)
Zoning is located to the west. U (Utilities) Zoning is
located to the east. IL (Industrial, Light) is located to the
south across St. Lucie Boulevard.
SURROUNDING LAND USES:
The general existing use surrounding the property is
residential to the north, industrial to the south, and the St.
Lucie County International Airport to the east.
-....
....,
January 7, 2004
Page 2
Subject: John M. Dunn
File No.: RZ-03-046
The Future Land Use Classification of the surrounding
area is MXD (Mixed Use Airport) to the north, south, and
west. T/U (Transportation/Utilities) is located to the east.
FIRE/EMS PROTECTION:
Station #4 (4000 St. Lucie Boulevard), is located
approximately 1 mile to the east.
UTILITY SERVICE:
The subject property is in the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority
(FPUA) service area.
TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS
RIGHT-Of-WAY
ADEQUACY:
The existing right-of-way for North Kings Highway is St.
Lucie Boulevard is 80 feet. The existing right-of-way for
Hammond Road is 60 feet.
SCHEDULED
IMPROVEMENTS:
None.
TYPE Of CONCURRENCY
DOCUMENT REQUIRED:
Concurrency Deferral Affidavit.
*********************************************************************
STANDARDS Of REVIEW AS SET fORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE
In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning
Commission shall consider and make the following determinations:
1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions
of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code;
The proposed zoning district is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land
Development Code and has met the standards of 11.06.03.
2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St.
Lucie County Comprehensive Plan;
The proposed change in zoning is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie
County Comprehensive Plan. The request is compatible with the MXD - Airport
(Mixed Use - Airport) Future Land Use classification, which designates the
subject property for commercial/industrial uses.
Policy 1.1.8.5 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan requires effective
visual and light diffusion barriers between residential and non-residential uses.
'-w'
'wi
January 7,2004
Page 3
Subject: John M. Dunn
File No.: RZ-03-046
The proposed construction office shall be required to provide an 8-foot high fence
or wall between the subject property and the residential community to the north.
Policy 1.1.1.1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes maximum
lot coverage by buildings for the IND (Industrial) Future Land Use Category as 50
percent. The existing 1,008 square foot building on the property has a lot
coverage of less than 1 percent.
Policy 1.1.9.5 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan stipulates that St.
Lucie County shall develop and implement a tree and upland habitat protection
ordinance to prohibit the premature clearing of land and the destruction of native
habitats. Any proposed re-development of the property will be required to apply
for a vegetation removal permit and meet all applicable mitigation requirements.
Policy 1.1.9.10 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan requires that the
developer of any site shall be responsible for the on-site management of runoff in
a manner so that post-development runoff rates, volumes, and pollutant loads do
not exceed pre-development conditions. Any proposed re-development of the
property would be required to meet all requirements pertaining to the pre-
treatment of runoff prior to possible drainage off-site.
3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with
the existing and proposed land uses;
The proposed IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning is consistent with the existing industrial
uses in the area. The St. Lucie County International Airport is located to the east
across Hammond Road. This airport is a commercial airport operation, which
also has some aviation manufacturing facilities and activities located on-site.
The MXD - Airport Future Land Use Classification designates the subject
property for commercial/industrial uses in the future. The property to the north is
residentially designated. Consistency with this property may be maintained by
the use of adequate buffers.
4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment;
Conditions have not changed so as to require an amendment. The applicant
would like to operate his heavy equipment construction business from the site. In
order to do so, a rezoning to industrial light is necessary. The subject property is
designated for commercial/industrial uses in the future and the current RMH-5
Zoning is not consistent with the expected future growth of the airport area.
5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the
proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities,
including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water
supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency
medical facilities;
--
--
~
\w'
'wi
January 7,2004
Page 4
Subject: John M. Dunn
File No.: RZ-03-046
The intended use for this rezoning is not expected to create significant additional
demands on public facilities in this area. Any re-development will need to
demonstrate that there are adequate public facilities in the area to support
opening of a contractor's office use.
6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
significant adverse impacts on the natural environment;
The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the
natural environment. Any development will be required to comply with all state
and local environmental regulations. The subject property is the location of an
old, abandoned home. Any additional construction on-site would require the
application of a vegetation removal permit.
7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in
an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any
negative affects of such patterns;
The proposed amendment would ultimately result in an orderly and logical
development pattern. The subject property is located in an area of light industrial
and aviation uses. The current designation for residential use is not compatible
with theses uses and designations.
8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public
interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code;
The proposed amendment is not in conflict with the public interest and is in
harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development
Code and Comprehensive Plan. The surrounding area is considered
commercial/industrial for any future development. The existing residential
neighborhood to the north can be adequately buffered from the proposed
construction office by the provision of an 8-foot high fence or wall and associated
landscaping between the subject property and the residential community to the
north.
COMMENTS
The petitioner, John M. Dunn, has requested this change in zoning from the RMH-5
(Residential, Mobile-Home - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District
on property located at 2835 Hammond Road, the northwest corner of the intersection of St.
Lucie Boulevard and Hammond Road in order to allow the property to be developed for a heavy
equipment contractor's business. The subject property is located to the west of the St. Lucie
County International and north of property zoned and used for light industrial purposes. The
surrounding area is considered commercial/industrial for any future development. The existing
residential neighborhood to the north can be adequately buffered from the proposed
construction office by the provision of an 8-foot high fence or wall and associated landscaping
between the subject property and the residential community to the north.
....
"-'
'wi
January 7,2004
Page 5
Subject: John M. Dunn
File No.: RZ-03-046
Attached is a copy of Section 3.01.03(T) - IL (Industrial, Light), of the St. Lucie County
Land Development Code, which delineates the permitted, accessory, and conditional uses
allowed in this zoning district. If a change in zoning is approved, the applicant, by right, would
be allowed to establish any of the uses under the Permitted Uses section. Any use under the
Accessory Uses section would be allowed only if one or more of the permitted uses exist on
the subject property. Any use under the Conditional Uses section could only be allowed if it
first receives approval through the Board of County Commissioners.
Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms to the standards of
review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is
not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive
Plan. Staff is, therefore, recommending that this Board forward a recommendation of approval
to Board of County Commissioners.
Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter.
Attachment
hf
cc: County Administrator
County Attorney
John M. Dunn
File
~
'-'
Suggested motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested change in zoning.
MOTION TO APPROVE:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING,
INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN
SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE
THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE
COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT APPROVAL TO THE
APPLICATION OF JOHN M. DUNN, FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE RMH-5
(RESIDENTIAL, MOBILE-HOME - 5 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE IL (INDUSTRIAL,
LIGHT) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE ....
[CITE REASON[S] WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC].
MOTION TO DENY:
AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING,
INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN
SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE
THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE
COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPLICATION OF JOHN M.
DUNN, FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE RMH-5 (RESIDENTIAL, MOBILE-HOME - 5
DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE....
[CITE REASON[S] WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC].
~
..,.¡
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
K.
RMH-5
RESIDENTIAL. MOBILE HOME· 5
1. Purpose
The purpose of this district is to provide for the permanent location of mobile homes for residential
purposes, together with such other non-residential uses as may be necessary for and compatible with
mobile homes. The number in "0" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code
reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the
SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code.
2. Permitted Uses
a. Family day care homes. (999)
b. Mobile home parks and courts subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.17. (999)
3. Density, Area, Yard, and Height Requirements
The density and dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
4. Parking
Parking shall be in accordance with Section 7.06.00.
5. Landscaping
Landscaping shall be in accordance with Section 7.09.00.
6. Conditional Uses
a. Telecommunication towers· subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999)
7. Accessory Uses
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00.
L
Adopted August 1, 1990
108
Revised Through 08/01/00
T.
1. Purpose
'"
'wi
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
!L
(
INDUSTRIAL. LIGHT
The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for light manufacturing,
wholesale, and warehousing activities that do not impose undesirable noise, vibration, odor, dust, or
other offensive effects on the surrounding are, together with such other uses as may be necessary
to and compatible with light industrial surroundings. The number in "0" following each identified use
corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to
a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code.
2. Permitted Uses
a.
b.
Business services (73)
Communications - including telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section
7.10.23 (48)
Construction services:
(1) Building construction - general contractors (15)
(2) Other construction - general contractors (16)
(3) Construction - special trade contractors (17)
Engineering, architectural and surveying services (871)
Commercial fishing (091)
Laundry, cleaning & garment services (721)
Local & suburban transit (41)
Manufacturing:
(1) Food and kindred products (20)
(2) Tobacco products (21)
(3) Textile mill products (22)
(4) Apparel & other finished products (23)
(5) Furniture & fixtures (25)
(6) Printing, publishing and allied industries (27)
(7) Drugs (283)
(8) Leather & leather products (31)
(9) Glass:
(a) Flat glass (321)
(b) Glass & glassware - pressed or blown (322)
(c) Glass products - made of purchased glass (323)
(10) Fabricated metal prod. - except machinery & transport. equip.:
(a) Metal cans & shipping containers (341)
(b) Cutlery, handtools & general hardware (342)
(c) Heating equipment, except electric and warm air, and plumbing fixtures (343)
(d) Fabricated structural metal products (344)
(e) Coating, engraving & allied services (347)
(f) Miscellaneous fabricated metal products -
(1) Wire products (3495)
(2) Misc. fabricated wire products (3496)
(3) Metal foil & leaf (3497)
(4) Fabricated metal products - NEC (3499)
(11) Industrial/commercial machinery & computer equipment:
(a) Metalworking machinery & equipment (354)
t.
c.
d.
e.
f.
g.
h.
121
Revised Through 08101/00
Adopted August 1, 1990
,.
(b) Special industry machinery, except metalworking machinery (355)
(c) General industrial machinery & equipment (356)
(d) Computers & office equipment (357)
Electronic & other electrical equipment and components, except computer
equipment:
(a) Household appliances (363)
(b) Electric lighting & wiring equipment (364)
(c) Household audio & video equipment (365)
(d) Communications equipment (366)
(e) Electronic components & accessories (367)
(f) Misc. electrical machinery equipment & supplies (369)
Measuring, analyzing and controlling instruments (38)
Photographic, medical and optical goods (38)
Watches & clocks (38)
Misc. manufacturing industries:
(a) Jewelry, silverware, and platedware. (391)
(b) Musical instruments and parts. (393)
(c) Dolls, toys, games & sporting goods (394)
(d) Pens, pencils, & other office & artists' materials. (395)
(e) Costume jewelry, costume novelties, and notions. (396)
(f) Brooms and brushes. (3991)
(g) Signs and advertising displays. (3993)
(h) Morticians goods. (3995)
(i) Manufacturing industries. NEC. (3999)
Plastic products - fabrication, molding, cutting, extrusion, and injection processing.
(308)
Marinas (4493)
Millwork and structural wood members. (243)
Motion pictures (78)
Motor freight transportation & warehousing. (42)
Repair services:
(1) Automotive & automotive parking (75)
(2) Electrical (762)
(3) Watch, clock & jewelry repair (763)
(4) Reupholstery & furniture repair (764)
(5) Misc. repairs & services (169)
Retail trade:
(1) Lumber & other building materials (521)
(2) Paint, glass & wallpaper (523)
(3) Hardware (525)
(4) Nurseries, lawn & garden supplies (526)
(5) Mobile home dealers (527)
(6) Automotive/boaVRV/motorcycle dealers (55)
(7) Gasoline service (55)
(8) Furniture & furnishings (57)
Research, development, and testing services. (873)
Ship, boat building & repairing -less than forty-five (45) ft. (373)
Sorting, grading & packaging services - citrus/vegetables (0723)
Vocational Schools (824)
Wholesale trade - durable goods:
~
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
(17)
i.
j.
k.
I.
m.
n.
"
o.
p.
q.
r.
s.
Adopted August 1, 1990
122
'WI
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
Revised Through 08101/00
(1) Motor vehicle and automotive equipment. (501)
(2) Furniture and home fumishings.(502)
(3) Lumber and other building materials. (503)
(4) Professional & commercial equipment/supplies. (504)
(5) Metals & minerals except petroleum. (505)
(6) Electrical goods. (506)
(7) Hardware, plumbing and heating equipment, and supplies. (507)
(8) Machinery, equipment, and supplies. (508)
(9) Misc. durable goods:
(a) Sporting and recreational goods (5091)
(b) Toys & hobby goods (5092)
(c) Jewelry, watches, precious stones & metals. (5094)
(d) Durable goods NEC (5099)
Wholesale trade - nondurable goods:
(1) Paper and paper products. (511)
(2) Drugs (512)
(3) Dry goods and apparel. (513)
(4) Groceries and related products. (514)
(5) Farm products - raw materials. (515)
(6) Chemicals, and allied products. (516)
(7) Beer, wine, and distilled alcoholic beverages. (518)
(8) Misc. nondurable goods:
(a) Farm supplies (5191)
(b) Books, periodicals & newspapers (5192)
(c) Flowers, nursery stock & florists' supplies (5193)
(d) Tobacco/tobacco products (5194)
(e) Paints, varnishes & supplies (5198)
(f) Nondurable goods, NEC (5199)
Mobile food vendors (999)
Single family detached dwelling units provided that the single family dwelling unit is located
on an existing lot or parcel or record, as further defined in this code, that was existing on or
before August 1, 1990. (999)
~
t
u.
v.
3. Lot Size Requirements
Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
4. Dimensional Regulations
Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
5. Offstreet Parking and Loading Requirements
Offstreet parking and loading requirements arelosubject to Section 7.06.00.
6. Landscaping Requirements
Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00.
Adopted August 1. 1990
123
\wi
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
( I
(
Revised Through 08101/00
'-'
"'"
Section 3.01.03
Zoning District Use Regulations
,.,
7. Conditional Uses
a. Airports, landing and takeoff fields - general aviation (4581)
b. Manufacturing:
(1) Cut stone and stone products. (328)
(2) Motorcycles, bicycles. and parts. (375)
(3) Wood containers, wood buildings and mobile homes. (244/245)
c. Ship, boat building & repairing (excluding ship or boat salvaging) - Forty-five (45) to one-
hundred fifty (150) ft (373)
d. Wholesale:
(1) Petroleum bulk stations and terminals.
e. Scrap and waste materials· subject to the provisions of Section 7.10.12,A.
8. Accessory Uses
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00 and include the following:
a. Co-generation facilities. (999)
b. Fueling facilities. (999)
c. Industrial wastewater disposal. (999)
d. One detached single-family dwelling or mobile home for on-site security purposes per
property. (999)
e. Retail trade accessory to the primary manufacturing or wholesaling use. (999)
¡.
Adopted August 1, 1990
124
Revised Through 08101/00
'-'
""
C a.... Z
C ':t!
::) <0
0 ~
0
~ I
cry -~j I
c 0
.!:: N ~
0 .~ ~ II
J a:
\ c
~ \{ ,
~
~ ~
,
" ~1
~
\
..
en I
...
II: '.,. \\
~
z
::> III~
0
Ü -
_ ..111_
--
a: --
UJ
>
ã: ! -
1III'f2 IØIII"
... i \
:ill ..
=
.. I III _10M 'IIJIII
II: r
z
« _ GDIS
Õ
~ _ 110'_
..Z-j '''''
...
II:
~
::>
o
ü
_ ..' JiIiMi
... z
¡::
:ill ~
II: :2
s st 1
1
...
I
~
...
...
II:
AlNno::>
3380H::>33>10
,
S ~t 1
~
(])
.Q
0
~
-
CO
:.¡::¡
c::
<D
-0
CJ)
(])
a:....;
__.S:2
~
+-'
LOW
1·-
IO
~ 0)
a:.~
C
<DO
£N
-
+-'
E.1::
0)
0·-
~-I
O)(~
C'¡:: ..
.- +-'
C W
O::J ..
N-o
c
C ;:::..
Q)::::! 1ft
0) ..
C<D
co.1:: ..
.1::+-'
Ü 0 ..
CO::
~O
O·¡::
-êi5
CO'
C ..
ð~"
. 'c
~O
CN ..
.1::ã)..
O~
"'"')0 ..
Õ~
C -0 ..
.Q LO
~cb
æE
o
«I
\.r
tD
N
0
Z
0
c
0
U
(:)
(:)
LA..
a..
fJ"""'....-.., LA..
-.;::--_......
'U
L.
0
>
Q)
pooè pUOWWOH ::)
0
II)
.. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. ..
Q) Q)
Q) 0
c c
0 0 ::)
.. -I .. .. -I ... .. -I
.. .. .. .. ..
.....
... .. (/)
tD
.. .. .. .. .. .. N
F~aJ~S o::>!uoJa^ III 0
Z
Q
C 0
C .. C
.. .. .. .. .. <t: 0
III U
.. .. .. .. ..
(:)
(:)
..
LA..
..
a..
LA..
..
-..I
~z
--"'----
,----;
)
')
,
(
,
I
I
I
I r'
\ I '--_
, ,...... \
......- -- I
,
(
\..
C
'.....
c-- - - -,
,.J
.-________J
PèI Ja~ua~ - ~S pJ£<;
,j9 ª iu
! i¡ . IH'
æ I!
! .8 'nl
~rz i
Q) «1'
,¡!!~I~JI
C) ~ H
a :¡r
'q ~ 8~~
l( g- Iii
V\ ~ "f
:,1
CD
~
o
I
(V)
o
w
(])
-æ
o
-0
c_
.- <D
cO
~~
<Daj
¡::Q.
aj+-'
Q.o
<D
wE
E::J
r-W
N
a:
'-'
:J
.J-'---..-
"--,.,,--,,.,""
c
C
::J
o
~
c
..c
o
J
WI
..
..
...
...
...
'"
III
Q
..
tIr
:!
:t
IQ
0>
.~
c
o
N
C)
o
tD
N
o
z
o
c:
o
U
o
o
u..
Æ
u
:J
-J
o
c:
o
U
...."
,----;----
J --
(
'I
I
(
I'
I
I
I
I
\ r"
,'-_--..-....-1 '--_
\
I
I
\
~
15'"------
....--- \
-----~
PèI Ja~uaJ - ~S
I
pJ£<;
I I
c
,
z
A t
~. 1 0 ~ II!
r~ ~ ~ Hi
~ .2! ~IJ
J ~ f!i
~ 0 íp
.~!! " i.¡
~ (!) !!! ÞI!
~ i h~
rl~ g. IJi-
\J\ ::E Ji
lfj
d
-- ~
Cf)
Q)
-æ
.S:2
-0
c
.- Q)
CÜ
1.-1.-
<D:m~
-+ co +-'
" o.ü
Q)
O Cf).......
._.0
I ..c ~
(Y) ~ Cf)
o
N
a:
'-'
c
C
::::J
o
.
~
CD
N
0
Z
-
0
e
2 0
u
0
0
lL..
a.
fJ"""...-... lL..
\::_-_/
PDOè pUOWWDH
, , , , , , ,
I--
.. .. .. .. .. .. ..
~
.. .. .. .. .. ..
..
-- - ~
wI ,æ" Q) c: f!IJfP Q) ¢. IN" Q) ..
e e e
0 0 0 ~
VI VI ....J VI VI ....J VI VI ....J VI
f--
.. .. .. .. .. .. ..
I -
.. .. .. .. .. .. ..
- CD
.. .. .. .. .. .. N
-' ..
D :)¡tr'ðol ø ) -
+øøJ+S ~ .. 0
I---
, ~ ~ ~, z
, , , ~ 'I' JL -
e 0
.. .. .. ; ~ ..~ t-- e .. e
.. ..." « - 0
.. .. ~ . ~., " u
., .. ., ~ -
0
I. e J E ~.. ..... !::I c:i
r-=>" e r¡;." .. Q) -
0 '! L. Þ
VI VI Q) VI VI « VI 0 a
0 v' ~
L. II!
.. .. .. .. .. .. 0_
.. : (t- o:
.. .. .. I \ ..
.. y .. .. v.. lL..
..
,...
" ",
c
..c
o
J
Q)
en
:)
-0
c
(t
.....J
>J
.....
(/)
/____ - _ø'- - -- --
)
I
'I
I
(
,
I
I
I
I r'"
\ I '--_
, _/ \
......--- I
I
I
'....
C
'.....
0
z
-
c-- - - -,
,J
...________.J
'0
L.
o
>
Q)
:J
o
CD
Q)
U
:J
....J
Pèl J~}U~:>
- IS PJrs
- - ~ z
';, M in
~t? ~ Hi
í(~' ~ i~J
E .
~ ~ Iii
.)!l i 1~1
~ C) æ All
~ ~ I~~
.l, fir Ad
~ :::¡; ',Ij
:,
en
Q)
ca
()
-0
c_
.- Q)
CÜ
L..'-
Q)(t
, r"\ :t:: Q.
~ (t ......
~ Q.~
O.~E
I .c:::::l
I-en
C'i)
o
N
a:
'-'
..."
J?" ...'.'...'........,..~..........".,
~;, ~"'!', ~'V. .'. ... . ,. .
~? ""~". ~, "
t';Ý<' , ,''-/:. .. '. . f,~, t·
~~:~.,![t~e<-;~, ' " h- -." 't::;,
'1'..";' . .r.....
~~ ' " ·'fl "1'
~ ,,', - --
. , - ~
·'c··-"'··"",
',., ~,:i - y
~'~i .~
~
A €
,Aå~ IU
r~t/ ,:[ i Hi
E .
Q fz.
"so ~!H
~ a ~h
.~!!l i tal
C) Oi ~H
.,j ~ II!
., a. ŠI~
.l( fa- lit
\f\\ :::; I fj
if
en
Q)
~
U
"D
c_
.- Q)
cU
~~
Q)CO
,,..... :t::: Q.
~ co-+-'
, ~ Q.~
O,~E
I L:::)
~en
(V)
o
N
-~ a:
¡"tt ~ : '
'~:I'~ .. .
~~,:~:~~¡ , b~
. .~"r~:iY_ 'f,.
'-'
....,
AGENDA - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION
January 15,2004
7:00 P.M.
JOHN M DUNN has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change ilJ ZolJJng /Tom the RMH-5
(ResldelJtial, MobIle Home - 5 du/acre) ZolJJng District to the IL (JlJdustn'al, Light) ZolJJng Distn'ct for
the folloWJng described property:
LocatiolJ:
Northwest comer of the intersection of St Lucie Boulevard and
HammolJd Road
Please 110te that all proceedIngs before the PlanlJJng and ZolJJng Commission/Local PlanlJJng
Agencyarc electronically recorded If a person deCldes to appeal any decision made by the PlanlJJng
and ZOlllng Commission/Local PlanlJJflg AgElJcy WJih respect to any matter consIdered at such meeDflg
or hearIng, he WJjJ need a record of the proceedIngs, and that, for such purposes, he may lJeed to
elJsure that a verbaDm record of the proceedIngs is made, which record Includes the tesDmolJyand
eVldence upon which the appeal is to be based Upon the request of any party to the proceedIng,
IndiVlduals teSÚ1j7lng dunÍ1g a hearIng WIjJ be swom In. Any party to the proceedIng Will be granted an
opportulJJiy to cross-eXaIlllne allY 1ÍIdiVldual tesDfY¡ng duniIg a hearlÍ1g upon request. Wniten
comments received In advance of the public hearIng Will also be cOlJsldered
Prior to this public hearIng, noD'ce of the same was sent to all aqjacelJt property oWlJersJanuary
.f, 2004. Legal llOú'ce was published In The News and The Tn'bulJe, newspapers of gelJeral circulaDon
In Sf. Lucie County, onJanuary.f, 2004.
File No. RZ-03-046
'--'
-wi
~
-
.;..>11'1.1"_
BOARD OF
COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
~=r. ~eJt:IE ~'
COU NTY ""
F LOR I D A ,~;-.." .'
,. .
tr...!:_
T....
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
January 5, 2004
In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that John M.
Dunn has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from the RMH-5 (Residential, Mobile
Home - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District for the following described
property:
Location:
Northwest corner of the intersection of St. Lucie Boulevard and Hammond
Road.
THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AILABLE UPON REQUEST
The fIrst public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on
January 15, 2004, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex,
2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard
at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Written
comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission should be received by the County Planning Division at
least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing.
County policy discourages communication with individual Planning and Zoning Commission and County
Commission on any case outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or
provide written comments for the record.
The proceedings of the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to
appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any matter considered at
such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure
that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon
which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying
during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-
examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing
may be continued to a date-certain.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie
County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-
1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new
owner. Please call (772) 462-1960 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number: RZ-03-046.
Sincerely,
(~T7UC~~ ~t.~?!Y PL~~~G AND ZONING COMMISSION
[--(/ )?[v'vCZ / -I f5z ~
Éd Merritt, Chainm/n
JOHN D, ßRUHN. District No 1 . DOUG COWARD, District No, 2 . PAULA A LEWIS, District No, J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No, 4 . CLIFF ßARNES, District No, 5
County Administrator - Douglas M, Anderson
2.300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL .34982-5652
Administration: (772) 462-1590 · Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GIS/Technical Services: (772) 462-155.3
Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 · Fax: (772) 462-1581
Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 · Fax: (772) 462-21.32
www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us
~
~
'0
t
~
rI.)
=
.S
-
=
Ë
oS
=
..
e,¡
~
f
ÞÐ
Æ
I =
- =
= ::I
~Q
§.~
.s =
~'§
~...,
....IIS
;'.:~
= I
::I""
8=
8N
==:
u ...
'SoS
- -
= .~
~....J
8 ÞÐ
1:: =
=:.=
g~
'--'
""
C\/C\/
C')IO
COC')
1010
I ,
C\/....
coco
=-.,0)0)
.. '<; ' '<; '
N C') C')
coC\/.... '<; ''<; '
'<; 'O)'<; ' IOC\/
OC\/O '<; '....
O)....CO ....0)
I I I I I
CO'<; '.... CO.... COCO
'<; 'IOCO'<; 'IO'<; ''<; '
0) 0) 0)0) 0) 0) CO
'<; ''<; ',<; ,,<; ,,<; ,'<t1O
C')C')C')C')C')C')'<; '
'<t'<t'<t '<t'<t '<t
C\/C\IC\I C\lC\/ C\/
....- T-..,- ,.......,- ....-
0)0)0) 0)0) 0)
I I I I I I
COCO COCOOCO COCO COC\/
'<; ''<t'<t'<tCO'<; ''<; ''<; ''<tCO
0) 0) 0) 0) CO 0) 0) 0) 0) 0)
'<; ''<; ''<t'<t'''''<; ''<; ''<t'<t'<; '
C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')
,... C')....C')
C') C\l0C\/
C\/ .... ....
co 0)100)
I I I ,
....COCOC\lCO
O'<t '<t CO'<; '
100)0)0)0)
1O'<; ''<; ''<t'<; '
....C')C')C')C')
COIO 10 CO CO C\I
OC\/ C\/OO 0
........ ....00 0)
0) 0) O)!O) 0) '<t
I I I I I I
COCOCOCOCOCOCO ....
'<; ''<; ''<; ''<t,<; ,'<t'<; ' 10
0)0)0)0)0)0)0) 0)
(J)(J)(J)(J)(J) (J)(J)«(J)
o
«
z'
..J«..J
u..Üu..
v
,a.
~
Š..J..J..J..J..J..J..J..JI..J..J..J..JZ..J..J..J..J..J«..J..J..J..J..J..J..J..J..J..J
rl.)u..u..u..u..u..u..u..u..Ou..u..u..u..~u..u..u..u..u..a.u..u..u..u..u..u..u..u..u..u..
0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0)
ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:ä:
~t::t::t::t::t::t::t::t::
ü&&&&&&&&
-
e:
0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0)
- ~ ~ ~ ~ t:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ œ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~~.~~~&~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~§~
~a.a.a.a.~a.a.a.a.a.0)a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.~a.
Ot::t::t::t::~t::t::t::t::t::Et::t::t::t::t::t::t::t::t::t::t::O)t::
~ 0 0 0 0 § 000 0 0 0 0 000 000 0 0 00= 0
..J u.. u.. u.. u.. ~ u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. C/J u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.. u.., u.. u.. :J u..
~ e: ....
:::.:...J =#:
e: a. e: e: e: e: e: e: e: e: e: 1:) e: e: e: e: e: e: a:
..Je:..J ..J..J..Je: ..J..J..J..Ja: ..J..J..J ..J..J..J a:~
1:) 1:) e: 0) e: e: e: e: « e: e: e: e: ã) e: e: 0 e: 1:) e: e: e: 1:) ãj
~a:oo~ ~~~e:~~~~"-~~~~~O)~~e:~~e:~~~ a: 0)
«~ -~- ---~O---- >__..J_oo..J___ ~~
.~_~O)C\la:1:)~ø~a:~~~~~ ~~~~E«~~O)~~~~~~e:e:O)O)
:::.:. 'Õ 0) ~ "- ~ ~ ~ ~ æ O)e: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0) ~ 0 e: ~ ~ ~ ..J ..J .- '-
.§, 55 .3 ~ =æ 2> ~ ~ 'Õ e' ~ ~:E t:: e' e' ~ e' ü 2 ~ e' iií e'.3 æ ~ ~ 2>. >-. >- ~ ~
~5~ëñðð~;:~CS~~~~~~~~~~~~~æ~èi5~~~~~~3&
~O....'<tooCOIO........C\lC')....o),...C\I....o),...IOUC/JOCO:EOC\lcoococoC')....,...,...
~g~~o~~g~~5g88~~~~~g8~~~g~~~~~~~5~
< C\/C\/IOa.C\/,<; ,"" '<t C') 10 10 1010.... 101010 IOCO'<; ''<t,<; ,C\I 10 C')IO 10 10 10 '<t'<; '.... 10
~
8
=
z
-
~
~
..J
"-
0)
1:) ~
e: _
~ 'c
~ ~
<~
.C:
a.
«
"'")
"'") 0)
>-O..J
~E~
'- ~ E
.c:0)_
C/JOO«
"'") "'"):EO)
.S! ¡ß ~ 0) .~ >-
.~ "i: 0) e: J!! ~
~~>~w~
.: .c: 0) ~ 0 0)
>üooo a.
a:
~
·c
e:
0)
o
:E
.c:
-
"- 0)
>-O)-C
~x~
~O)=
a.ow
ë
~
-
~
=
....J
"-
.c: 0)
0) E
> ëñ
~ 0)
æ~
ëñä:
~
.3:
0)
..J
ìDe:æ
e:O=
"-t::O)
~ 0 ~
~I:E
>-"-
~E{g'S~~
"-~~(ijO)E
~ ~ ~ :£ .~ .{g
üOOü:Ea:«
:::.:.
o 0)
~ 0) "-
.c:ë.9:1
~~~
>-
ã)
0)
Z
~
8
=
z
~
~
w~ Ie: ~ a:üa:..J°C/J 000 a:
~~ §jI ~ øt::~~~~~OW"-1:)I~ ..J~
ti£i~£O)~~æi~~~>-~~~e:~~E~~~~~
~O)O)~£"-OO)O)O>-~~~~Qq«"-«a:O~'"'"~
:Eooa.Z:::.:::wO"'")"'")..Ja:..J"'");>ø ~ ~..... '-J\,J ~
a: :EU E "'")
e:'S~Jg1:)e:
~~~=O).c:
~a.:E~Ù:~
Þ
e:
~
o ~ ¡:::- .c:æ
ëü ° C/J O)E=
~~1:)~ ~ ~~~~æ!~~i~ ~ ~O) ~,,-ìDc:æ
u~j~iRt~~1§2=æ~~~~~~E~¡ii~~i~8~~1~
:! èi5 ¡f~ Æ ð3 ~ ~ Æ ~ ~ d5 á: ë5 Æ ð ~ iÏ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Æ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~æ ~:~:E~
g 8'<t 8 8 8 8 ~ g 5 ~ 108 ~ 8 ~ 8 ª 8 ~ 8C\/ ~ 8 8co 8C') 8 ~ g 5 ~ 810 ~ S(,~ g
808888888808888õ880õ8008888õoõ888
....10,... COCO....C\/C')'<tIOCO,...COO)O....C\/C')COO)O....C\lC')'<; 'IOCO,...CO.... c\/C')'<t
0....C\/C\/C\/0008ooooo........................C\/C\lC\lC\/C\/C\/C\/C\/C\/0008
00000000 00000000080080000000880
000008080000880080 00 0000000 00
=#:....C\/C')C')'<; ' 0 0000 00 000000000000............
C')C\/'<t'<; ''<; 'oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo
Q....C\lC')C')C'),...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...
"000000000000000000000000000000000
~C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')MC')C')
='<; ''<; ''<t'<; ''<; ''<; ''<t'<t'<; ''<; ''<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<; ''<t'<; ''<; ''<; ''<t'<; ''<t'<t'<; ''<t'<; ''<; ''<; ''<; ''<; ''<; ''<; '
~....-....-....-,.........-,.......,-....-,.........-....-....-....-....-....-....-,.........-....-....-....-....-,.........-....-....-,.....,.........-....-~....-....-
'"
~
'0
t
~
~
c
.2
-
~
E
...
,s
c
-
\,
:æ
c..
E
~
~
I C
_ C
C =
~Q
[~
..s¡ C
~'§
~.....,
-...1iS
§~
Ea
EN
=~
u ...
'S,s
- -
c .:i!3
~..,;¡
E ~
1:: C
,,=
g~
,--,.
0)""
....0
00
....0)
, ,
CO Ll) co.... co,... co....
oqoqoqOoqLl)oqO)
e:~~~~~:g~~
NC')C')C')C\ C')....C')
oq
C')
C')
C')
co"",...oq ,... Ll)""""""""""C')
C\ 00C\ C') oqC\ C\ ............
,...00.... oq Ll)oqoqoqoqoq
0)0)0)0) .... Ll) ....oqoqoq
I I I I I I I I , I I
oco coco C')CO"" co Ll)Ll)000
C\ oqoqoqC\ oqCO""OOLl)Ll)Ll)
C') 0)0) O)C')O) 0).... C')C')O) 0)0)
C\ oqoqoqCOoqoqC')C')C')oqoqoq
oqC')C')C')oqC')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')
~
s~~~~~<~»~~~z~~~~
~~~~>~~~z~~~~ ~~~~
Q)Q)Q)C)Q)'OQ)
e e e ... e 0 e
Q) Q) Q).ð Q) 0 Q)
ël:ël:ël:~ël:~ël:
~t::t::t::(¡jt::8t::
ü~~~ü~a:~
~~~~~
~~~~~
Q)
'0 ~ ëii Q)
E Q) 0"E
~ ~ Q) Q) ~ '0 Q) 0Q C Q) Q) Q) Q) ~
cceet:cO", ~'OeeeQ)
;: ... Q) Q) Q) 0 .!i! :: ~::I Q) Q) Q) '0
=~ël:ël:ël:E~(J) cjël:ël:ël:::I
¡ß~t::t::t::Et::t::~gt::t::t::t::j
:>Q)ooo~oo;¡¡¡::::;oooo_
:>(D~~~I~~...:;>~~~~~
.... ....
c C') 00
~ ~ C\ C\
... Q) Q)
c ~ Q)__
C ~ '0 Q)'O~(J)(J) '0
< ;: a: Q)~a:~__ a:
= ... ~-ø-(J)(J) -
Q)c~ëii~ ~ ~Ere~~ ~
S(¡j~~~<S'OøSSS~o~....== ~
M'U a:Q) "'c- -- ø
~~~""::I~~ ~~~~SQ)~;:C\ C\ «<e
E~EX'OoE~oEEECëii;:(J)WWQ)Q»Q»~
~<~<S£Q)<~o«<O>""Ll)zz>__w
-coO)"" ....~co(J)a:cocooqco....Ll)co........<--
~COCOCOCOOCOCOOLl)C')coO)....o....Ll)COCOCOCOCOCO
<~~~ære~~~~~~~~~~oco~ggg~
°
c
o
Ü
'0
~ oo~
.= ~~~o
000'"')
.~ Ü () Ü
¡:::- e--g C)C>C)
æ 0 ~.~.~.~
" ü(J)::2::2::2
~ ..... - 000
~ ~ ~ ~~ ~5III
-c ......- c>c~ø _...
~oø~ '"')Q)'O ø::lO-cQ)ø ...~occc
z~~~ ~E"'ø~oØ~Q)... mc~Q)Q)Q)c
.~ªU~£~iøE~(¡jc~~~::I~Q)E~~~c
~~~~~ð;:~S88~æög~~~<ðððB
....COLl)C\ O)O)coC')o,...oq....COLl)COLl)C\ Ll)Ll)C\ O)
8°Qo088°8°888888888~8°88
08õ880 0 000000000 00
Ll)CO,...COO)O....C\ C')~Ll)CO,...cooo............C\ C')
00000....................................0000008
00000000000000000088
000000000000000000 0_
*~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O~~~NNNc
QRRRRRRRRRRRRRR~NNNNNN~
-oooooooooooooo............................~
~C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')C')~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<
Ë
~ ~
Z ø
~ :È
~~
<
~~
~ ...
~~
Ë
~ §
Z ~
- ~
~ Q)
..,;¡ ~
'C ...
S""
ø ~
~ Q)
Z~
~
Ë Q)'"')(J) ~
Q)Cø_~_
~-~Q)ï:t::"E
zQ)E::IQ)Q)~
~£oEC)~£
_ ~ ~ ~ ::I 0 ._
¡'ü~(J)wa:a:
<
~
-
::I
a:
~
Q)
t5c
coð
j;:
ø
::I
1ij
~
Q) Q)
'C :;:;
~ ~
~~
~
ø
c
Q)
ëS'
~
ü
~
°
'c:
-'0
~ 0
Q) ...
zø
...
Q)
E
"Cn
;:
c
o
~
~
Q)
~
...
Q)
-
Q)
~
;:,!¿
o
ø
ø~
ø E
o 0
(Dü
Q)"E
c ~
>.~
~ °
;:ä:
~c
~~E
a: ~ ~ .~
-c:~...-
~~ð~
c
~"t:~e
c ~ 2 ~
<W(D~
c c
~~~
~ ~ c
.....,
-" i r : :,.".", .., ..
\.-
w)~~;;¥r:~~~
@~()~ ~ ltC{ i5
@~ -:)w:)(W'\ !2vc4, ~S520'b }1c,r'Jo.r~"¡" 14Y>1I ç¡O
,
p~\ ~3
o
~--~
:> ~
...... cø
riJ ~
Ü Œ)
. ~ w
~ u- ~
___~___: 11 . P~____H_.. --
: I' .
.-- IIW<v fuJ . . ~ ~.
.. _. . !i~ V1V "2.~~RMH-:-S C ~)~-.
L~m- .¡~ \-\(J1'Y\Q.,-5c!..u{~)1bTL(~...L~
..___- . !If.&v~ß2-03~OLf~-~±Pw~-m
,-.-------------- --_..;~:. --- -------.....----------------------.. ..
---.----fl J) m.bt ~_witL ~:::~OllAÖ-:ll~J~~:~=~
Ii rlð.rtlln~ vn-r---·++- Dn~:~-b}! í~C,~ I
. -.......- ~.. ~ ~... ~T~~~~ð"~
iilJ ~~~~~~~
i¡ ~1l>~~. .......
--. . ... d l17ß I filM .j~ · 5/15/f}t/fr'{{£:Þ1
_ .'._ P.!. . (. ~/: J {__ 'm. éH-;V¡'J, ~~'-.
_ ..@ . .' aaL.. _ __2. q.fI!l~awn L~ 'U..___
- ~ ,: -~ K ~HMti1J¡
1: (If 1Y\rJ1;~l1"", (Q.,He . .. .
~\~~~Zh/~~ ~ àf-/··..
þ>9? 7?¡J/¥-A æ~ :fj!;d~~#;
(]) i j :5<1/9.. Md/; J('ef JI/)/ll7llifc~ ß-.
·.~~;:~~:'¡t~;~.
. . .
~_~_ - ~ ß~ F-' . . _._~.=_.u_____ ·u.__ -....-
~ ~~
.----& .-... - -_.___rsl!{_~__!14!lC1-~tT¿r,.J (,.1 3-'tC:¡'¡Þn
-. &r5q~
; I (h/~~u - ~ :_ - n_.___~.. .-.,,' ___~~~~--.~~-t:-n U ---.
~u__.ß)_: um~ ð~
I . '. . L \
¡ - ¡'--..
---~·--@.i~~ µ. :5\.. '-7 I.
.-----.---.ø-.J~/I. ·ß .... .51¿7.~ ~ /;t... . FZ·.$'¿,
i' . /.; ~ ,~y~
-- -@¡~~ w- . ,-_pnl>1~ d..-.. /..... r'L· ,s'Wø
_u._,8:¡. . +-{¡j; ~ '.
.-'}..'1:I.. ~ . d~ ~ n'B 111"-r9.~
..._..-.--_.---.-.-._-....) .~;i... '.. ~/73..~~..'.. .. ,. ~.,
_.~i ~ '. ~~I.D6'~.~
" . J ;/ m5Y\~ ~~ -?{<O§QJn~ ~
"6:(þ(.\¡''-UJ ~ ód-~l ~~~
..:<. . ~~ 46~1~1l:J.k.....~
_~C5 , ~4 ~~~ 3Zþ:z,,¿~//:~
31; ~. /l¡e.{·~h ~.d01 ;/61/ limy
YàOJw\ <t- ffi~ r\J ~ 50(" 1 ~ ~
;. 't2EÑC'E .-(.. ~~æ. "''1'}S LJfl9A..vt/jJ~
:1 .' ~ 5 b3/ bQJt~~q ~,_
'~~~ t
, \~~~ ~ao'b-~~~ \
- ..- -.-.-..--....-----"---- _.._--~---_.-. -- . -- ._- --
p~ LðfJ~
~++ -----. -
- .-. - -_._----.. - ------+----.---
.-- .--.- ----
---.- -..-----_.--~--- - ----.---.-..-.---- - -.--.-..-.- --- .---.----
u__._ ___._ ._
-.--_. -------
.__.._..u._._
__h_._.·___.___ _._ ._________ ____._
.. - ---.-- .----
;!
-- --.- -'. -t~--· -.--.-- . - --
_'·__.._n_...__.._ _
. .--- .-.---.-----..-
-- ---
.-- -- ~. .._--~.
. _____.__.n...
:¡
11
-.-. _._..~
.j
u _u____·_.. ___.._
-- .---------- ,-
11
-_ -_._-_.~l__ _ ._
,1
- ______ __ - _.M___.__ __¥
__·_____h____. _.___..____
- _ -- L
- -.-. -¥-..... -
. _. _._ __._____.·__u
. - ... .-..-." .
;¡
,-
__J'_d
íi
!
..-
¡
--- - -..... - ..--
'4
r
- -.
.
I.
f"
í'
~
I
p~ 3 bb 5
--
'y
"
To:
Submitted By:
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
\..I
....I
Agenda Request
Item Number
Date:
~. :r
02117/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[ ]
[ ]
[ X ]
Quasi-JD [ X ]
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
Approved 5-0
é~
6/~
Consider Draft Resolution 04-016 granting a n Existing
Conditional Use Permit to allow for the expansion of an existing free-stan ing drinking
place and retail liquor (distilled and un-distilled) store in the CG (Commercial, General)
Zoning for the Lakewood Park Liquor Store on property located at 4902 North Kings
Highway (Indrio Crossing Shopping Center).
The petitioner, Ranjana Patel, operates the Lakewood Park Liquor & Pub in the Indrio
Crossings Shopping Center. On March 13, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners
granted approval, through Resolution 90-72, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a
package liquor store and lounge for the subject property located at 4902 North Kings
Highway. The purpose of the Major Adjustment is to allow for the expansion of the retail
sale of liquor (distilled and undistilled) for off-site consumption into additional square
footage at the shopping center..
The proposed Major Adjustment has been determined to meet the standards of review
as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and is
not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the SI. Lucie County
Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Conditional Use Permit is not expected to
adversely impact the surrounding area or properties. The existing and proposed
location is within an existing shopping center, which is zoned for general commercial
uses. The proposed use is not expected to create significant demands on any of the
public facilities in this area.
N/A
On March 13, 1990, through Resolution 90-72, this Board granted a conditional use
permit to allow a package liquor store and lounge to be known as Lakewood Park
Liquor Store in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District.
Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-016.
r-¥l COMMISSION ACTION:
~ APPROVED D DENIED
c=J OTHER
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Coordination/ Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
-- -~-~-
-
-
=- ....
'-'
...I
t
Commission Review: February 17, 2004
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division
MEMORANDUM
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
County Commission
Community Development Director
February 11 , 2004
Application of Ranjana Patel for an Major Adjustment to an Existing Conditional Use
Permit to allow for the expansion of an existing free-standing drinking place and retail
liquor (distilled and undistilled) store in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for
the Lakewood Park Liquor Store on property located at 4902 North Kings Highway (Indrio
Crossing Shopping Center. (File No.: CUMJ-04-001)
The petitioner, Ranjana Patel, operates the Lakewood Park Liquor & Pub in the Indrio Crossings
Shopping Center. On March 13, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners granted approval, through
Resolution 90-72, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a package liquor store and lounge for the subject
property located at 4902 North Kings Highway. The purpose of the Major Adjustment is to allow for the
expansion of the retail sale of liquor (distilled and undistilled) for off-site consumption into additional
square footage at the shopping center..
The proposed Major Adjustment has been determined to meet the standards of review as set forth in
Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and is not in conflict with the goals,
objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed Conditional Use
Permit is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding area or properties. The existing and
proposed location is within an existing shopping center, which is zoned for general commercial uses. The
proposed use is not expected to create significant demands on any of the public facilities in this area.
Staff recommends that the Board approve the petition of Ranjana Patel, for a Major Adjustment to an
Existing Conditional Use Permit to allow for the expansion of a liquor store for the retail sale of distilled
and undistilled alcohol for off-site consumption for property located in the Indrio Crossings Shopping
Center in the CG (Commercial General) Zoning District.
Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 04-016, which, if approved, would grant the major adjustment for
the expansion of an existing free-standing drinking place and retail liquor (distilled and un-distilled) store
in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning for the Lakewood Park Liquor Store.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Attachment
hf
cc: Ranjana Patel
County Administrator
County Attorney
File
..
; r:
-
..
-
-
., - --~---------~---
..
~
'-"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
RESOLUTION 04-016
FILE NO.: CUMJ-04-001
A RESOLUTION GRANTING A MAJOR ADJUSTMENT/.TO A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO AllOW T~§(.fØR THE
EXPANSION OF A FREE-STANDING BAR AND A RETAIL LIQUOR
(DISTillED AND UN-DISTillED) STORE IN HE CG
(COMMERCIAL, GENERAL) ZONINGiPISTRIC."('FO ERTAIN
PROPERTY IN ST. lUCIE COUNTY, FLORIPA.
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of$t~Þ~9¡~ County, Florida, based on the
testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the~mffreport, has made the following
determinations:
1 . Raniana Patel. presented a petition for.~ 11"~~pt.@djustment tø*nexisting conditional use
permit to allow for the expansion of @nf)xis~nQ ·~tanding bar and retail liquor (distilled
and un-distilled) store in the CG (Commerºi~ I) Zoning District for the property
described below.
2. On February 22, 1990, the §t.tucie County Plannirjg and Zoning Commission held a public
hearing on the petition, @ft~rpublishing noticel1t least 15 days prior to the hearing and
notifying by mail all 0V\fJ"l~rs of prpperty witqin 500 feet of the subject property, and
recor)1mended thatthe.. ~8ård of Cou9tý9p~rnlssioners approve a conditional use permit to
alltq~ operatipn.pf@l?l1ckage liq~pr~tpre and lounge project to be known as Lakewood
P iqUQr Store¡J"Itþ~çß (Commercial, General) Zoning District for the property described
in low.
3. On Mar/,1S ...0, thisBø@r~held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice
at le~~l15tJa. {to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500
feet of the sub erty, granted approval, through Resolution 90-72, to allow for the
þperation of a liquor store and loung in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning
District.
4. On February tZ¡i2004, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing
notice at leasti10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within
500 feet 1q~i$ubject property.
5. 'T~~prôþosed Major Adjustment to a Conditional Use is consistent with the goals, objectives,
ål"ldpolicies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements
of Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code.
6. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the
character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters
affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare.
File No.: CUMJ-04-001
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-016
Page 1
..
, '"
-
.-
-
............
'-"
~
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
7. The proposed project will be serviced by adequate public facilities and services.
8. An amended Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this.resolution, was
granted by the Community Development Director on FebruaryJZ, 2004;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the BoardofÇountyÇóQ1rnlssioners of St. Lucie
County, Florida:
A. Pursuant to Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie~punty L~~d DevelO .<...gP9~,a Major
Adjustment to an Existing Conditional Use PermitJpr Lakewood Park Li9H2r.§Jore to allow
for the expansion of an existing free-standing b~ . r~.tailliquor (distilled and un-distilled)
store in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning D ranted for the property described
as follows:
THAT CERTAIN PIECE, PARCEL OR TRACT OF LAN[).~ITUATE, L YINØ G IN THE CITY OF FT.
PIERCE, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE )A8TJÇY~RL Y DESC OLLOWS: PARCEL 1:
THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THe NPfI!tfweST1/4 OF SEC .3, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH,
RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIPA,LYlNG SUNSHINE STATE PARKWAY FEEDER
ROAD (S.R. 713) AND NORTH OF INDRlpROAD; L INOTHEREFROM THE EAST 818
FEET OF THE SOUTH 228.17 FEET. )~RCEL 2: Tt;ti ... .... . .OF THE EAST 818 FEET OF THE
SOUTH 228.71 FEET OF THAT PARTpF THE SOUTHWEST~!"OF'l"HE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION
13, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE~9 EAST, LYING NORTH ()FINDRIO ROAD IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY,
FLORIDA. PARCEL 3: EAST 613 FEET OF THE SOUTHi228.71 FEET OF THAT PART OF THE
SOUTHWEST 1/4 OF THE Npfg'HWEST 1/4()F SECTION,J; TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST,
LYING NORTH OF INDRIO R()~; LESS A~p~XCEPTINC¡THEREFROM THE WEST 458.71 FEET OF THE
EAST 463.21 FEET OFTHeSOUTH 208.7.tÆEJ. THe AaOVE·DESCRIBED PARCELS CONTAIN A TOTAL
0f..33.272 ACRES, M()Ri: ()R LESS, AS PESÇ~IB~f,')!ALSO DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THAT PART OF
Ttfe SOUTHWEST 1!40f.!HE NORTHWES'J:1t40F SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39
~$T,ST. LUCIEiCOYNTV.FI-ORIDA, LVINOEAST OF SUNSHINE STATE PARKWAY FEEDER ROAD
(!PI.713)AND NORTtfPfl~f,')RIO ROAD; LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM THE WEST 458.71 FEET
OFTtlEEAST 463.21 Fi:1ST OF THE SOUTH 208.71 FEET. (Tax ID#: Part of: 1313-232-0001-000/4)
0, 4902, an~4904North Kings Highway (Indrlo Crossings Shopping Center»
B. This Major AdjÙ~tQ1ehftp an Existing Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire on
February 17, 2005;~l'lless a zoning compliance is obtained or an extension is granted in
accordance with Section 11.02.06(B)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code.
C. The Major Adjqstment to a Conditional Use Permit approval granted under this Resolution
is specificªUyêonditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Ranjana Patel, including
~¥~.~99~åsors in interest, shall obtain all necessary permits and authorizations from the
ijPPf()priate Local, State, and Federal regulatory authorities prior to the issuance of any
local building permits or authorizations to commence development activities on the
property described in Part A.
D. The Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, shall remain valid
for the period of Conditional Use approval. Should the Major Adjustment to a Conditional
Use approval granted by this resolution expire or an extension be sought pursuant to
File No.: CUMJ-04-001
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-016
Page 2
~
...
'-"
--
'....I
Section 11.07 .05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a new certificate of
capacity shall be required.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
E. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authori.~~d and directed
to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Officia,..Zoni9QMap of St. Lucie
County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to th .. te>pf adoption of this
resolution.
After motion and second, the vote on this resohdiþn was a
Chairman Paula A. Lewis
Vice-Chairman John D. Bruhn
xxx
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson
Commissioner Doug Coward
Commissioner Cliff
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED
OARD.OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
~LQCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY
Chairman
APPROVED AS TO FORM
AND CORRECTNESS:
County Attorney
hf
H:\WORD\Petitions\BCC\Finished.04\LakewoodParkLS.CU\LakewoodParkLS-RES.doc
File No.: CUMJ-04-001
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-016
Page 3
....... ----.....
"-'
'wi
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 Certi ·
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
Exhibi
pacity
File No.: CUMJ-04-001
February 17, 2004
Resolution 04-016
Page 4
-- - --~
- -
"'"
\wi
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes
The Following
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property
Located At:
Major Adjustment to existing Conditional Use Permit to allow for the
expansion of a liquor store.
4900 North Kings Highway (Indrio Crossings Shopping Center).
Currently Zoned:
CG (Commercial, General)
Píease Return To:
St. Lucie County, Department oí Community Development
Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: February 10.2004.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
~
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
J< {\ ¡v':j-A ~ (\ç ,h( l
f-,1.C.' $,; \..~. tJALIV1(;'Î1-C. G!:)\,e-- Fe:,'zT ~-+ L~ìé';e
Address:
Date:
"- {1 I D4 Signed:
~
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
;.
Comments:
ill - 9 2004
(FILE NO. CUMJ-04-001 - Ranjana Patel)
~ ---- ~
- ....
'-"
...",.1
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes
The Following
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property
Located At:
Major Adjustment to existing Conditional Use Permit to allow for the
expansion of a liquor store.
4900 North Kings Highway (Indrio Crossings Shopping Center).
Currently Zoned:
CG (Commercial, General)
Please Return To:
St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development
Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: February 10.2004.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
_v'
I certify that, as of the date shown below, lam a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
~bhl:V '~ljb
ltJ70! Incl/rloRd
Address:
FT. Fre r~ e-' J FL .
Date:
d/'5/D4
,
Signed:
~- ...~ -
, // t1 ¡.;/ (,. l-t~X~
Please note that any form returned without a name anà--adârê~s will n~t be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
r' ...-' '. ~
I;' !"
. ........... ,...,,..... -----".,.."....1
c;. / ~ J, -'r'!n'~'L~FNl
~-"-,--~:--..::...:.- ---'.~- . ..
(FILE NO. CUMJ-04-001 - Ranjana Patel)
~
...... ~
..... z
,~
,-- ~I
Q) 0
+-' J
ctS
a.. -~J'i
ctS 0 .
C J 'i~ I I
ctS ~ ~
........
c ::J c.
ctS 0 ~ J
a: 0 \ C.
'\
~
z
::>
0 C
Ü
+->0 --
0·-
Q)âj 1IIOII1IICIíiIooIIIIi-¡
a: ----.
w 00 ¡I
> ª
ëë '--a I
... Q..--.J ;1
lit = I
..
g: I --
z
«
ã t'lwJ ,"",
~
r
...
I
..
'"
g:
S ~E !
S SE !
AlNnO:J
g:
...
'"
...
g:
,
~
::>
o
CIÍåIi' jri" iìiõíi-"'-'-' - Ü
,
...
z
... ¡:::
lit a:
Go ~
"',
'ÍlÓGlloíiñ~--
,>~
"
'"
',,-
"
,
'"
"
'-,
"''''
y
...
....../.
~-
..
...
..,~/' .
~.
,/
g:
S " !
,
.,.
3380H:J33>10
~.
A Petition of Ranjana Patel for a Major Adjustment to an
Use to allow for the expansion of a liquor store in the
General Zoning District.
15 I
.....Q) I
Son Carlos Drive
~ I ð'
¡¡; ~
c: I.~
~ 1:1:
Õ :;
o c:
c: I~
~I
<':>1
ID /I .
"
15
- -
...I
Existing Conditional
CG (Commercial,
, , ,
IØ IØ
Q)
, . ::3 , .
c:
5 Q)
IZ > 5 IZ
«
4 IJ 4 IJ
Q)
J .Q J H
H 'ë
0
t 15 (/) t 15
15 15
. IZ IJ H
15
James Rood
15 III
H IJ
IZ
7 ,
, IØ
.
Miromar Avenue
ID . . " 15 J t
V
. IZ IJ H .
0
Santo Barbaro Dr Z
Õ
H c:
Q) 0
> U
... IØ
0 15
,
.:::/.
... ,
0
a..
0
't) , ~
0
0 5 3:
~
Q) 4
.:::/. lL.
0 J
...J a..
t lL.
v
o
z
.5
~
CUMJ 04-001
V / / / ~ This pattern indicates subject parcel
. Indicates subject bays within parcel
~.L~.~~
GIS 7~
Map prepared January 29, 2004
--"'--""--"'--""',
YHe ..-¡ efkwt hu ~ må .., pI'CIIIItde .. moll CUNni Ind øu-.
~ pouIbIe,. II noI ~ tor ~ . . IegIIy binding docu'nft.
,
N
Ranjana Patel
" I
I I ,
.....
Son Carlos Drive Q)
Q) If ItJ
I- Q)
.....
III . . , · (/') . . ::1
1-5, c
.5 Q)
II 5 œ >
. II IJ If " .c «
..Q. I~
0 Q)
James Rood 0 :f!
c ' c
. " If IJ · Q) 0
Q) I (/')
l-
t:) 1
, I , IIJ ·
Mir omar Avenue
III
'¢
"
0
Santo Barbaro Dr Z
0
If C
0
Q) U
>
I- ItJ
0 "
,
~
l- I
0
IL ,
0
1:J . ~
0
0 5 ~
~
Q) 4
~ lL.
0 J
...J IL
, CN lL.
Indrio Road
I
,
IIJ
.
.
4 IJ
J If
, "
.
J ,
'¢
0
z
õ
AG-1 c
0 .S
u ~
CG
AR-1
CUMJ 04-001
V / / / ¿j1 This pattern indicates subject parcel
. Indicates subject bays within parcel
~.Á~ a,~
GIS 7~
Map prepared January 29. 2004
__....__tor__...__.....
While ~ ettoI'I,.. ~ "... to pnMde IN moll ca...-.-.:I .xuae
InIonnIItion pouibIe,'. not InIiInded tar 1M . . IegIIIy tindIng dacuTWi.
f
N
"-'
Ranjana Patel
Land Use
CITI:r:J +J I , , ,
I ,
San Carlos Drive Q,)
Q,) If tJ tJ
L. Q,)
+J
., · . , · (/) . . :J . .
I~ c
c Q,)
:.ë /:£ 5 . > 5 .
· · " H 15 a. ct:
0 I~ 4 I.J 4 "
Q,)
James Road Q c J J:J J H
I~ H ·c
C c
· 15 H " · Q,) 0 0
Q,) I ~ I lIS (/) I 15
L. Q,)
<.:> I Q
, , , tJ · . .
Mir amar Avenue
J I
III ·
V
· .
0
Santo Barbara Dr Z
Õ
· H C
0
Q,) U
>
L. tJ
Q 15
,
~
L. ,
0
a.. ,
Q
"0 . :::::!:
0
0 5 3:
~
Q,) 4
~ I.&-
0 J CO
...J a..
I I.&-
Indrio
v
o
Z
Õ
c
o c
U ~
COM
RM
CUMJ 04-001
V / / / ~ This pattern indicates subject parcel
. Indicates subject bays within parcel
~.Á~ &,~
GIS 7~
Map prepared January 29,2004
""'_'" -. _ tar__ rod __~,
...... .wy efb1 hu '-WI n-. to pnMde .. mœI WNI't n a:::ana.
InformIIIIon poNib6I,.1t net iWIded b... . . ~ I:indhg dcxuTwi.
f
N
'"
....... -.-..
."",
V // / ~ This pattern indicates subject parcel
. Indicates subject bays within parcel
5è .L-,,- ~~ !
Gla ~. ~ r
Map prepared January 29,2004
ThII "lIP" ~ oompIId IarQliWWpIIn*'CJ InCI ......... ~ cnIy. N
.,.,.. ..-y 1IIbt... been "... 10 pnMde tie mall CUNnI Md ......
~ poIIIÞte.. II nci IÑInÔId tar.. . . ...., tftIng ~
- -
v -..""I
Ranjana Patel
~~ , · , .
Son Corlos Drive Q)
Q) >- IØ IØ
L- 0
l/) III III " +J ~ Q)
. (/) ~.£: , · ::3 , .
CI Ql C
"'- .,,- IJJ -r
:Q 1£ > "
· " 11 H 15 <
..t- UJ
18 I g' 4 IJ Q) 4 U
James Rood .SJ
I~ 1 14 '2 J H
" 1 C
· 15 H U 1 Q) 0
Q) I . · (/) , 15
L-
. ~ I
7 , . IØ . .
1
Miramar AVlll"lue
:. .46
: .50 46
1.72
.97
1
l/) III III II .
,
~
· " .
0
Dr Z
Õ
C
Q) 0
> U
L- II ~70
£:)
I
.:,£
L- .
0
a. ,. 1.32
£:)
'U ~
0
0 3=
~
Q)
.:,£ I.&..
0 2.31
-I D-
.
I.&..
I
I
I 1.65
I
I
..-------
4.25
8.50
--------------- -------------------~----
CUMJ 04-001------ 500' boundary
V / / / ~ This pattern indicates subject parcel
. Indicates subject bays within parcel
5è..L~ ~~
GIS ,.~..::-
Map prepared January 29,2004
__........_.._01_-__.....
YttIIIt ..., effort '* ..... medI 10 pIIMdI '" molt QIIfWIIIfId 80CUIII
ntcwmIIion poaI)Ie,. II not WUnded for '* . . IegeIv Þrdng dcxurwt.
f
N
FEET TO' A POINT ON A LINE 45.00 ~E'T OF AND PARALLEL WITH SAID EAST L.INE 0' SECTION .a AS SET FORTH BY
5,R.D.; ~ENCI SOUTH D2. 3".' WE ONG SAID LINE 45.00 -EET WEST OF AND PARALLEL Wffi TIlE EAST LINE 0_ SEC.
TION 32 AS SET FORTH BY S,R.D., A DI ANCE 0' eoo,I."UT TO THE ~RSEC'T1ON OF SAIl> LINE 41.D0 I'IIT WEST OF AND
PARALLEL WITH THE EAST I.INE OF SECTION 32 AS SET FORTH BV S.II.D. AND A CUAVE CONCAVE TO THE NORntEAST HAV.
ING A RADIUS OF 26&.55 FEEf, A CMOAO DISTANCE OF 20.01 FEET AND A CHORD IEAIIING 01' SOUTH.' 11'15" EASTi
THINeE ~NG THE ARC OF SAlO CURVE THAOUCH AClNTIW. ANGLE OF 04 . 18'11' SOUTHEASTERLV A DISTANCE OF 20,02
FEET TO THE POINT OF "GINNING,
SAID LA/IID CONT"NS 42.01 ACRES MORE OR lESS.
L.tc,&lOII: $oul"-st Gon,.r of Sou'" 26t" St,..t 'lid lo-Mile Cl'llek,
PAlMS AND ,",OPlCAL TREES DEPOT, INC., Ivr, Ch',.. in Zo"¡"1I frOIllItl, AG-IIAgriC\jllu,.' - 1 cIuI.crej Zonill' Diwlc1 to It1f1lL
(lndu.I';.1, Lighl) Zonillg DlI1rlc:1 fo, 11111 lollowing dflCnbld proper1y:
2 3S 31 N 112 OF NE 1,44 OF SE 11' . LESS E 3t FT FOR RD AN/) CANAL RSM! ·120.4 I AC) lOR 338.2112)
Loe.lion: Wllllidl of king_ HIghway. . ) 'o~lmlllly 1100 f..1 north of thl ¡nl,,"clion of K;"" H1911wlv .nd '-Iii. ¡mmldilllly
SOulh of Krell Glrd.nl.
fIIANJANA PATEL, 10" M' OI Adiullmlnllo ,n ,wisti,,; COlldIIiOl'l.1 U" P,rmll to .lIow for \tI1 .xp.n.ion 01. NquO, SlO'!) I" I~
CG tCommtrci~l, G.no..l) Zoning DIstrict for lhe fallOWIng dele,ibld p,aplr1y:
THAT CI!I\TAIN ~ICI, 'AACEL OR TRACT OF LAND SITUATE, LYING AND SliNG IN THE CITV OF FT, PIERCE, ST. LUCIE COUNTY,
FLORIDA. MORE PARilCULAFlL 0( DISCAllm M FO~LOWS!
PARCEL 1:
THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWfiST 114 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHI' )4 SOUTH. AAN¡;E 3. EAST, ST, LU-
CI! COUNTY, FLORIDA. L VING EAST OF SUNSHINE STATE "AAKWAY F£EOER ROAD IS, R, 1131 AND NORTH OF INDRIO ROAD;
LESS AND IXCe'TlNG THEIIEF!\OM THE EAST 818 FEET OFTHE SOUTH 228.17 FElT.
PARCEL 2:
THE WEST 2D6 FEET OF THE EAST 818 FEET OF ntE SOUTH 228.71 FlET OF THAT ,~ 01' THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF THE NORTII.
WESt 1/4 OF SECTION 13. TOWNSHIP 3& SOUTH. RANGE 31 EAST, lYING NORTH OF IND"IO ROAD IN ST. LUCI! COUNTY.
FLORIDA,
PARCEL 3;
EAST 813 FEET OF THE SOUTH ~a',7' FEET OF THAT PART OF THE SOUTHWEST 114 OF THE NORTHWEST 1M OF SECTION 13,
TOWNSHIP:M SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST. LYING NOATHOF INOIIIO AOAD: LESS AND EXCEI'T1NG THEREFROM THE WEST &68.71
FEET Of THE EAST 46U1 F!ET OF TH! SOlJT}i 201.'1 FEET.
TI1I AlOVI·DlSC/lllSfO PARCELS CONTAIN A TOTAl OF 33.272 ACRES. MORE OR LESS, AS DESC'UIID.
AlSO DESCAISEO AS FOLLOWS:
THAT 'AIIT 01' THE SOUTHW£ST 1,. OF THE NORTHWEST ,,& OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 34 scunt. RANGe 3t EAST, ST. LV,
CIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LYING EAST OF SUNSHINE STATE 'AAKWAY FEEDEJllIIOAD (5.". "3) AND NORTH OF INORIO ROAD;
LESS AND EXCEI"TING THEREFROM THE WEST 411171 FEET OF THE EAST &63,21 FEET OF THE SOUTH 201.71 FlET.
Loc.tlon: 4800 Nonh Kings Higllwly IIndrio Cro..iftDI Shoppill Cent.r),
PARCEL 21 e THE RESERVE - BRIARCLI_F for a Chant. ¡" Zonint frOIllIl'l4 AII·1 fAgrlCl/ltUrel. IIlIIIldlMI.1 . , duJec..) Zoning Di.-
IncllD lhe PUD (PlIIVI.d Unll D,vllopm."U Zoning 1)illrlcl .nd' for Fin.1 PUD (Pllm.d Unil o.v.locmonll Ippro..1 '01 , 33.101
lubdiY¡lion fo, Ihl followingllllcrillld proP.rty;
BEING A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, FlANGE 39 EAST. ST, LUCIE COUNTY, FLOAID/\, AND
BEING MORE PARTICULAAL V DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCE AT THE SOUTi"A$T COANEII OF LOT 11, PAltCEL 15·'" AT THE RESERVE. ACCORDING TO THE PLATMREOF. AS
ReCORDED IN PLAT BOOK 28, PAGES 18 AND 111.. PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA; THENCE SOUTH 21
"'01' WEST, A DISTANCE OF m.11 FEET TO TIoIE POINT OF BEGINNING:
THENCE CONTIJ\ UE SOUTH 1241'11" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 10.00 FEET; THENCE NOR'ni 7711'''' EAST A DISTNACE OF 57.74
FEET TO THi POINT CURVATVIII OF A CVIIVI CONCAVIi TO THI SOUTHWEST, IoIAVING A "AOIUS 0' 130.00 FEET; 'J1oIENCE
SOUTHEASTERLY. AlONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE. ntROVGH A CENTRAL ANGLE 0' 5141'31" A DfITANCI 0' 121.5' ,.IT
TO THE POINT OF TANGEJ\ C'f; THENCE SOUTH &7 01'31" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 21.D1 FEET TO 'J1oIE POINT OF CURVATURE OF A
CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NOIITHEAST. HAVING A IIADIUS OF 70.00 FlET: THENCE SOUTHEASTEIIL V, ALONG THE AAC OF
SAID CURVE TIlROUGH A CENmAL ANGLE OF 2. 52'11', A DiSTANCE OF 32.83 FEtT TO APDINT ON A NON.TANGENTCURVE
CONCAVE TO THe NORTHWEST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 30.011 FEET; THENCE NORTHEASTER LV. ALONG THE ARC OF SAID
CURVEbTHROUGH A CENTAAl ANGLE OF 34 02'40', A DISTANCE OF 11.83 FEET TO THI! W!ST!IILV ..IOMT,O',WAY LINE OF
~EGlN S OIIIVI! ÞH) TO THE POINT OF CUSP OF A ,.,ON.TANGENT CURVE. THROUGH WHICH A RADIAl. LINE BEAIIS SOUTH 1&
08'13' EAST. SAID CURVE BEINO CONCAVE TO THE EAST, HAVING A RADIUS OF 110.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH!"LVl~ONG
SAID RICHT-OF.WAY liEN AND ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 54 21'0", A DISTANCE OF
1011.61 FEET TIENCE SOUTH 77 11'4" WEST. DEPARTING SAID RIGHT·OF-WAY LINE, A DISTANCE OF .77.... FEET; THENCE
SOUTH7~ 0"1~' WEST, A OISTANC! OF 211.13 FlET; THrNCE SOUTH 713&'53' WEST, A DISTANCE 0'495.13 FEET: THENCE
NORTH 88 53'04" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 216.13 FE!!; TH!NCE NOIITH 01 34·...' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 147.9D ffET THeNce
SOUTH 8' 53'35" E,AST, A DISTANCE OF 21U& FEET; T~ENCE NORTH 00 2&"1" EAST, A OISTANCE OF 28..3. FEET; THENCE
NORTH 39 11'09" EAST, ... DISTANCE 0_ 99,71 FliT; TMINCI SOUTH 17 20'25' EAST, A DISTANCI OF 3eø.75 FEET; TMENCI
SOUTH 112 28'08" EAST. A DISTANCE OF 1115.32 FEET: THENCE SOUTH 80 32'88' EAST. A DISTANCE OF 16.32 FEET; THENCE
NOIllTH II 19'21" lAST, A. DISTANCE OF suo !'lET; THENCE NOATH 77 1\'4'- EAST, A DISTANCE OF 24'.72 FElT TO""'I
POINT OF BEGINNING.
CONTAINING 9.73 ACIIES. LoIO"E 011 lESS,
LOCIllon: WI~t 51dl of t..CJ8ndl Drlvl, ICIIIlh of TM L8ur". IPllr:.1 11A) Ind norlll of Ihe End.ve IPllcell7l.
IÞOAT ST. LUCIE MOVINO AND STORAGE, for I M. or Ad ualmO"llo ,n EKlll1n9 Co"dllloll~1 U" "rlll;1 in 11\. CG ICoI'I'I""rci.I,
Glne"l) ZO"'"8 Oi.iet fOllh. following d.ecriÞod pro lll'\y;
THE SOUTH 150 FEET OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF 'THE SOl/THEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUAR1ER, LESS THE
EAST.7 FEET IN SEcnoN '0, TOWNSHIP 31 SOUTH, RANGE.O EAST, ST, LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA,
LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOI.I.OWINC DISClltlED PMCE!.:
START AT TH! SOUTHEAST COIINEIII 01' THE NO~TM 100 'Irr 0' THe SOUTH ZSo I'IET Of'THI SOUTHIAST QUAIITIII 0' THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER. lESS TIlE EASTERl v 47 FEET, IN SECTION 10. TOWNSHIP 31i SOUTH.
RANGE 40 EAST; THlNC! I'Roc:eeD Wl:S111'1L Y ON A LINe I'APlAlI.!~ TO THe: SOUTH LINe 9' THE SAID SOUTI1!4$T QUM111'1
OF THE SOl/THEAST QUARTER 01' THE NORTIMIIST QUAIITlII. A DISTANCE OF 11.3 PIIT TO TI'II POINT OR PLACE ~ BEGIN.
NING; THENCE CONTINUE WESTTiRL Y ON A LINE PARALLEL TO THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SAIO SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUAIl"''' 0' THE NOIIITHWlST OUA"'ltR, A OISTANCE OF as FlIT TO A IIOINT: "NCII ""OCEEO SOVTHti,,~ y
ON A LINE PARALLEL TO THE WEST UNE OF THe SAID SOUTHEAST QUAllTEfI 0' THE SOUTHEAST OUMT!II 01' 'l}4E NC,.TH-
WE$TQUAltTI!A A DISTANCE OF U& FEET TO A POINT; THENce PROCEED NORTHEASTERLY 26 FEET MORE OR LESS. TO THE
POINT 011 PLACE OF IEGINNING
...,. ~
'-'
\,-r
~
''''~;;';¡J.:-ii:f~':i~tt:~£;<tÞ.~~-.:JL:'''-.t,;j.:,t.':<_þ'';~~:';,¡:~!j.,¡L,~'_;~!;?¡\'LJ¡..Jd!t'~mï:~1':-~~BJ¡;~.
BOARD OF
COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
~~ ~eJel E - -' ~'~'""
COUNTY \.,
F ,L ..0.", R I ~ D A' ,,,,,,,
. . '"'J,,', <t.~ ¡ J"~. So'" 'i
COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT
DIRECTOR
''",~:'.fi~,~è'''.r~~2W~_'S;i.!\W¡á\:G1ifii-~~Dt1.:;:';-'~:'Îl'Li~~itÞ..t'bi')f·;,~,~Ai;"'1!..l~·~;
February 2, 2004
In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that RANJANA
PATEL, has petitioned St. Lucie County for Major Adjustment to an existing Conditional Use Permit to
allow for the expansion of a liquor store in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for the
following described property:
Location:
4900 North Kings Highway (lndrio Crossings Shopping Center).
THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AILABLE UPON REQUEST
The public hearing on the petiJion will be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on February
17, 2004, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex, 2300
Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at
that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County
Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least 3 days
prior to a scheduled hearing.
County policy discourages communication with individual County Commissioners on any case outside of the
scheduled public hearing( s). You may speak at a public hearing, or provide written comments for the record.
The proceedings of the County Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any
decision made by the County Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing,
he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of
the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be
based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn
in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying
during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain.
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie
County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-
1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428.
If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new
owner. Please call (772) 462-1582 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number CUMJ-04-001.
Sincerely,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS
·----¡;;~:c,ø:;Á~J / ¡~ZI4-
I
Paula Lewis, Chair
JOHN D, ßP-UHN, District No, 1 . DOUG COWAP-D, District No.2· PAULA A LEWIS, District No, J . mANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No, 4 . CLIFF ßAP-NES, District No, 5
County Administrotor - Douglos M, Andetson
2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce. FL 34982-5652
Administration: (772) 462-1590 · Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GIS/Technical Services: (772) 462-1553
Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 · Fax: (772) 462-1581
Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 · Fax: (772) 462-2132
www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us
~
..",¡
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes
The Following
Conditional Use:
Regarding Property
Located At:
Major Adjustment to existing Conditional Use Permit to allow for the
expansion of a liquor store.
4900 North Kings Highway (Indrio Crossings Shopping Center).
Currently Zoned:
CG (Commercial, General)
Please Return To:
St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development
Planning Division - A TTN: Dawn
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Februarv 10.2004.
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
Address:
Date:
Signed:
Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.
Comments:
(FILE NO. CUMJ-04-001 - Ranjana Patel)
-
""
.....,1
..
is
~
IT
::¡
~
..
~
~
i
OIl
...
..
..J
~
III ..
ëi..:
~!
I:~
~ :!!
c."
o'ë
j~
C!,.:
~~
§~
E..,
E:I
0:J
CJCJ
- ..
o 0
--
I:-
~::1
t:g)
...5
c.=
C!~
ú;
aJ
~
~~ <D~ ON ~;t ;t ~~ ~M ~ 0 ~ N'<t M N ~~ 88 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ N
::;t C\lM ON :g ~~ M ~
~~ LOLO [¡c;¡ ~ c;c; c;ïc; LO ~ ~ '<t'<t
~";" LO M LO'<t M ~~ ¿;¿; ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ LO '9
U;~ U;U:; 6~ ~;;; U;U; :r;U; u;u; ~æ ~M ~O u:;r:: <iï* ~5 ~Ñ 66 ~~ <iï~ M~
ß LON g¡~ LOLO ~~ COCO COCO ~~
aJO) 0)0) 0)0 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)1'- 0)1'- Me;; Me;; ~~ MM Me;; Me:; Me:; ~~ 0)0)
~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~PJ ~M ~~ ~PJ ~PJ ~~ MN MM MM "'M MM MM MM ~PJ g~
s
J!.J ..J.J ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1>- ..1< ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1..1 ..1..1 <..I
IIIU. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.z u.> u.u. u.u. u.u. ILU. LLU. LLLL U.IL LLU. U.LL C!Ju.
.c
VI .c "
~ " .. .c
.. Æ
iï: Æ "
-5 2j € 2j .. .c
2j 2j 2j 2j 2j 2j '" 2j ~ ~ 2j 2j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ....5 Æ ~ ¡;j ~ ~
CD èÞ .!i? .i! .g¡ ,g¡ ... .. .m .~ .. .. 0" .. .. I!!
o '" .!II.!II '" '" '" '" Æ .!II ~ .!II '" '" '0 '" o c: ~Cl. '" '" Æ~£
iï:iï: Cl.Cl. Cl.Cl. .ciï: Cl.Cl. Cl.Cl. iï:iï: iï:iï: Cl. ",Cl. iï:iï: oil: .EI~ [~ 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë ~ 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë 'Ë ,- iï:
I~ t::t:: t::t:: t::t:: Et:: t::t:: t::t:: t::t:: t::t:: et:: ...t:: t:t:: ct:: õí E ~1;) ,!I! ,!I! .!I! .!I! .!I! .!I! '" '" .!I! .!I! '" '" ,!I! ,!I! ~ t:: ~f¡5
o 0 o 0 && '" 0 && && && && '" 0 ~& && '" 0 '" 0 '" '" .- > :¡¡:¡¡ ,- 0
LLLL LLLL Cl.LL >LL IIILL ICl. z~ 5:::¡; :::¡;:::¡; :::¡;:::¡; :::¡;:::¡; :::¡;< :::¡;:::¡; :::¡;:::¡; :::¡;LL ><LL
8
..10 ~
LL~ !!:g :g:g :g:g :g:g LO :g:g :g:g :g:g :g
0
.c~ enLO LOLO LOLO LOLO LO LOLl) LI)LI) LOLl) LI)
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. õ)jIJ -OjIJ '" '" '" '" '" Q) '" so!! s.! SS !!
00 00 0 g¡-o 00 o .. o<ñ 0 - NIII ~III êñéi5 <ñ<ñ <ñ<ñ <ñ 111111 111111 en en III
~o III Ben
~~ ~~ ~ ~~ '" c: I!! c: '" ~ Q) a:~ ~~ -0'0 ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ '0
.. .. '" '" .. :2: '" .. .. I!! al~ I~ ,¡¡, ¡:; 'E: '0 ,- '" §ŒJ 22: 2'0 '0
Cl.Cl. Cl.Cl. Cl. -ŒJ Cl.Cl. Cl.~ '" >0 a: 0 .. > ŒJŒJ ŒJŒJ ŒJŒJ ŒJŒJ ŒJŒJ ŒJŒJ ŒJŒJ ŒJa: a:
~~ -e- -e ~O "'< <'"
-0'0 '0-0 -0 -0'0 '0", Æ8 '" c5J~ < c: .c c: VI E c: '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" CI> '" '" VI 0) VI
~ ~ ~ ~ ~<ñ ~ 8 ~ŒJ = " :§& _ c: õ~ < .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .5 LI) c:
Lõ.!! ŒJN :ea: III:>; N CD .-
'" ~ J!I c: ",I'- õ:¡ g g g ~ g ~ ~ g g g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~...
jj jj ~'2 ~ æ CI>~ _LI) ~~ I .. .c c: g ~ .- CO c:
...j I: a¡ I:LI) -6 ~ ~~ - '" ",,þ N'"
.. ~c?J LI).., .- ~ iiiiii iiiiii iiiOO iiiiii iiiiii iiiiii iiiiii iii~
.. .. .. .. '" "N en 0 .. .. '" .. '" )( NIII :9z > VI '1: ŒJ )()(~
!! ..1..1 ..1..1 ë:1II ~~ ..1..1 IIIC!J eno ~C!J < ~ Cl.~
'C ~C5 :g~ ~C5 ~~ ÕÕ NŒJ ~8 ~o z~ W~ ~I'- 0< ~o i~ ii ii ~~ ii oõ ~~ i~ SS~
~M 00 ~o ~N '<tLl) 1:;8 ~co coco ~~~
'C ~~ ~~ ~PJ ~~ 0)0) MaJ M<D ~<D ~ 1'-0 LOO 00 00 00
< '<t'<t '<tl'- I'-'<t ~Cl. I'-LI) LOLl) '<tLO N~ ~LO LON N¡;¡: NN NN NN NN NN NN NN
..
c:
c:
~ 8
.. a:
I:
..J
~ c:
OIl 0
I: VI
~ )(
'"
0 Cl.
~
.. '"
I: ':6
I&. ..J <
~ I!! :::¡; .~ .~ VI W
CI> ~= _.c '2 I:
~ "!j ... '" VI c: æ
.. ~ W~ Q) :ß CD "
ŒJW :::¡;.., 0 en
a: :g
.Q
..I LI)
< I!! '"
z 5! <ñ
..I ..
LL ~ Õ
~ õ Cl.
< ~ ..I
.. ... t!1~ !I:
I: VI c:
..J '" '" CJ 0
'0 ..2 I: c: ŒJ ~
~ õi ~ .. e 5! 1;) .¡ æ I!!
a ..
. > .. CD '" 0 ~ I: E ,!II III .5 5
i I:
a: ~i 1:: c: ~::> £ -eŒJ
'#- ~8 ~~ 0 ~~ Æ~
0 enCJ z
z
-
I! ..I
¡¡: ..I .. 0 w:::¡; .c < en ..1..1 ..1..1 ..I ..1..1 ..I ..I
.. i I: Q; I~ 0< <- < I~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ .c~ ~ ~ <
OIl ~~ U. ~ -o~ 1:..1 =I~ CD Q) c .!? I: c: .!II I: c:
i .'" E 2 =ï:i I: .- æ 5! æ 5! ~æ :¡¡ :¡¡ :¡¡ '"
I: '" ~ æ .!II ã; I: !3 VI ..
.¡¡, .. .3~ =s ~-o :6= '" CD .. 0 0 0 0 .J~ o 0 0 0 .'"
0 >ŒJ :::¡;III C!J CJŒJ :::¡;I <0 C!J~ I .., .., .., .., .., .., .., .., .., ŒJ
~$ VI VI VI
I~ i i !!
" f!~ c: ~
VI '"
~ ::::; ..W -0 W W W
I ~ Cl. = Cl. c: ~ c: I: c:
-0 VI -0 CD '" '" '"
.~ I~ :¡ '" :¡ "E .. "E "E "E .Q
~ ~ ~ 'E ~ ª .. -0 .. '" .. III
~ I: VI § C!J .C: C!J C!J C!J ...
- !:!! I .~ jIJ 0
.. i 2j Cl. ü: ü: ü: ü: ü: I:
c: c:'2 .. ~ E! e ..
~ ë ë ~ ~ '2 ..2 5! -g§ .., ò: .. ~ ~ ~ë ë ~ ë ~ ë ~ ŒJ
ã VI :2 ~ .. 5!~ ~ '" ð ñ: ,2¡ ,2¡
¡¡ CD '" I: ~ ~ VI c: o .. ~ '8 § ëë 1:1: ë '8 i'8
i :2 :2 :ª -6-6 ~ ~ .. CI> ~ g '" '" ~ ~ .§~ ~ ,2 ~ .g g 0 .91 .91 .!!!.!!! .!!!.!!! E E .!!! £Jg Jg£ Jg£ .. .!II ! c: ~I!
VI VI 8 ·Ë J:; ~i E~ -g ~ Cl. Cl. =Cl. '2
'" '" '" ~ " .. .. .. 0 .- '" ~~ '2Æ '" 'iiãi ãiãi e e õi - .. ..- æ.ií. 8!.û:. '"
a: a: a: § ŒJIII en ~a: enCJ CJO .!gill a:CJ :::¡; ~ LL 0 u: u: Cl.Cl. Cl.Cl. U. LL Cl. LLCl. Cl.LL LL ŒJ ŒJu.
~ ~ ~¡ II I'-§ Ii ~I II II II ~~ II §§ II ~~ II ~~ ~~ ~~ § ~~ I~ II ~~ ~ I M<D
~~
M PJ ~~ Š ~~ §§ 8§ I'- § §
8 8 88 88 §§ 88 88 8 88 õõ ~::
¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ~LI) c;;c;; PJPJ ~ ~ ii ~i ii ii ii i ii ii ii ii :;
e ~ìõ PJ~ PJPJ ¡:¡¡:¡ :; :; :;~
)C ~ g ~~ õo cC; ~g ~~ gg ~~ ~~ ~g Me; Me;; M¿;; c;e;; Me; Me;; c;;<; MC;; M c;e; Me;; Me;; c:;e; M M MM
. MM M(,)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
...... .......
'-'"
'--'
OJ
~
:::I
IT
:¡
of
..
II.
'0
o
¡
J
..
..I
..
...
III ..
a..:
.s
ë~
~ :!
Q."
oê
j~
C!":
~~
§9
E~
ä~
00
õ õ
....
C"
~~
t:CII
Ilª
c!:I
g~
~~
~M ~~
:!! R
<0 (I -
¡it æ~ ,
;¡;
1ï8 ! O>M 0>
PJ~ ~
S
J!..I -1< ..1-1 -1
III I&. I&.C) 1&.1&. I&.
.!!! Q)
8-5 ~ ~ 'g
- .. ~-1
.91 Æ S .91 :::100
B II. 0 cD. j1::
1:: _ ..1::
o Q) '" 0 .. 0
1&.> <I&. I&.D.
~ Q)
¡ ãj ~
'0 -g~
II: 0
... 0
I~ Q) * ãj ãi :=
8 E Q)
> - E
J: <0 - E
III -g-g £8 æ
OJ :J
OJ III (I Q) It;: ;:
e ex>1D
~ <00> ~8 III
'0 (I ~!8 0
I~ PJ 1ð~ ¡a
~
..
C
..I
t?
II
i
0
~
..
c
u. c
~ g
! ãi
-g
<
0
..
1::
co
::!:
~ ~
.. õi
c C
..I .2
~ ãi
II Z
i 1! c
r.
0
0 c .,
z
i!
it ::!: '"
r; E c
'"
I~ as c
-¡¡; '"
< II:
.E
g-š
- '"
'" õ
s¡ ::¡~
~ 'g C)'"
~ s -g~
c
. W co _
8 "'C)
j ~g
I ii5 as ._ c
.~ c '" '~ I- _
o c
:;¡ !!: "'gs
:::I :::I '"
III ZC J:I&.D.
~ II I
~ '"
'0
£Š
e ~ ~~ ~
)( M (;M M jl)
~
'--'
-J
.-
Commission Review: February 17, 2004
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: County Commission
FROM: Community Development Director
DATE: February 11, 2004
SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 04-003, amending the St. Lucie County Land
Development Code by creating section 3.01.03(EE) Cpub, Conservation - Public,
Zoning District and by amending Section 7.04.01, Table 7-10 to provide for
minimum lot standards for this new zoning district
Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 04-003, which proposes to Create new Zoning District to
be known as Cpub (CONSERVATION - PUBLIC). This Zoning District will correspond to the
newly created Conservation Public, Future Land Use Category, that was created as part of
recent amendments to the County Comprehensive Plan. The uses within this Zoning District
are limited to parks and other related conservation/ habitat protection uses. This zoning
designation will only be applied to properties that are in public ownership. Privately held
property, even if it is open to public use, would not be a candidate site for the application of this
zoning district.
On January 15, 2004, the Planning and Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency for St.
Lucie County held a public hearing on this matter. At the conclusion of that hearing, the Board
voted 8-0 to recommend that the County Commission approve Draft Ordinance 04-003. In
forwarding this recommendation to the Board, the Planning and Zoning Commission/ Local
Planning Agency for St. Lucie County made the following amendments to parts (2), (7) and (8)
of this draft Ordnance.
2. Permitted Uses
a. Cl.lltl.lFal activities and natl.lre exhieitiens. (999)
b. Public Conservation areas. includina hikina. canoeina. fishina. bird watchina. picnickina.
nature exhibits and all existina uses that are not neaativelv affectina the purpose of the
public purchase., (999)
C. PI.I9lis Parks ana Resreatien f'\.reas (999)
a. Police & Fire Protection (9221,9:224)
e. ResrGatienal Astivities. (999)
7. Conditional Uses
a. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999)
b. Heliport landina/takeoff Dads. (999)
c. Restaurants. (Includina the sale of alcoholic beveraaes for on-premises consumption
onlv.) (999)
"
.....,
February 11, 2004
Page 2
Subject:
Consider Draft Ordinance 04-003, amending the St.
Lucie County Land Development Code by creating
section 3.01.03(EE) Cpub, Conservation - Public,
Zoning District and by amending Section 7.04.01
Table 7-10 to provide for minimum lot standards for
this new zoning district.
8. Accessory Uses
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following:
a. Detached single-family dwelling unit or mobile home, for on-site security purposes. (999)
b. Heli~ert landiRgltakeoff pads. (999)
G. ReEtal::lr:mts. (IRsll::lding the sale ef alseholic Beverages fer en premises sensl::ll'~ption
only.) (999)
At this time, staff has no objections to the proposed amendments.
No action is required from the County Commission at this time. This is the first of two required public
hearings on this matter. The second public hearing on this matter will be held on Tuesday, March 2,
2004, at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible.
If you have any questions, please let us know.
Submitted:
Director
DJMI
OR_04-003_MEM02(h)
cc: County Administrator
County Attorney
Planning Manager
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
'-'
'wi
ORDINANCE NO. 04-003
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND
DEVELOPMENT CODE BY CREATING SECTION 3.01.03(EE)
CPUB, CONSERVATION - PUBLIC, ZONING DISTRICT ANI:>
BY AMENDING SECTION 7.04.01, TABLE .i'7'...10..TO
PROVIDE FOR MINIMUM LOT STANDARDS FOR<THISNEW
ZONING DISTRICT; PROVIDIN(; CONFt..IctlNG
PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FeR SEVERAB:I:.
PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILIN
WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STAT'E;i~ VIDING FOR A
EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FO·· oPTION AND
PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION
WHEREAS, the Board of County
following determination:
iFlorida, has made the
1.
On August 1, 1990,
County, Florida,
gtCounf\;~9~mlssioners of St. Lucie
the St.. Lucie County Land Development Code.
2.
91-009 -
92-017 -
93-003 -
93-006 -
94-007 -
94-021 -
96-010 -
97-009 -
99-001 -
99-003 -
99-005 -
99-016 -
99-018 -
00-011 -
00-013 -
02-005 -
02-020 -
03-005 -
COmmi$$i~~~~~.~~adopted certain amendments to
Lan :t~~xel~pment Code, through the following
93-007 -
94-018 -
95-001 -
97-001 -
97-003...
99-002...
9..004 -
9-015 -
99-017 -
00-010 -
00-012 -
01-003 -
02-009 -
02-029 -
ay 25,
itý25, 1993
August 16, 1994
January 10, 1995
March 4, 1997
September 2,1997
April 6, 1999
August 17, 1999
July 20, 1999
September 7,1999
June 13, 2000
June 13, 2000
December 18, 200t
March 5, 2002
October 15, 2002
May 14, 1991
June 2, 1992
February 16, 1993
May 25, 1993
June 22, 1994
August 16, 1994
August 6, 1996
October 7,1997
February 2, 1999
August 17, 1999
July 20,1999
July 02, 1999
November 2, 1999
June 13, 2000
June 13, 2000
June 24, 2002
October 15, 2002
October 7,2003
--------------------------------
Underline is for addition
Strike TRF9I !JR is for deletion
Ordinance #04-003a
Draft #1
Page 1
PRINT DATE: 12/05/03
1
2
3 3.
4
5
6
7
8
9 4.
10
11
12
13 5.
14
15
16
17 6.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27 PART A.
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37 3.01.00
'-"
....¡
04-001 -
XXXXX, XX, 2004
04-002 -
XXXXX,XX, 2004
On January 15, 2004, the Local Planning Agency/ Planning and Zoning
Commission held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance after
publishing notice in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune at.least 10
days prior to the hearing and recommended that the proposed ordinance
be approved.
On February 17, 2004, this Board heldiits first P~þ
proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice of s'4ch hearing
St. Lucie News and the Tribune on
On March 12, 2004, this Board held it~~~Ç9ijêlpublic hearing on the
proposed ordinance, after publishing9.~ôticêot rearing in the Port
St. Lucie News and the Tribune on
The proposed amendments.!p/t
Code are consistent with/the
standards of the St. Lucie
best interest of th Ith
St. Lucie County, Ida.
and Development
objectives and
Plan and are in the
welfare of the citizens of
Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie
TO THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT
INCLUDE:
****************************
Ordinance #04-003a
Draft #1
CHAPTER III
ZONING DISTRICTS
ZONING DISTRICT USE REGULATIONS
--------------------------------
Underline is for addition
StFike Tluewgl:l is for deletion
Page 2
PRINT DATE: 12/05/03
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
'-'
-....I
3.01.03
ZONING DISTRICTS
EE. Cpub
CONSERVATION - Public
1 PurDose
The ur ose of this district is to rovide an environment or the rotection
Dreservation or enhancement of Dublic lands in the ~~mtnunity. t~~eflìê~i~¡f~i~~~~ other~seSas
may be comDatible with public and Quasi-Dublic sur~~~ndinQs..;,!,"e numberi~,I(~!!i~~llo~il)Q each
identified use corresDonds to the SIC code refe~~.~~~~~9ribed in Sect¡o~~.~1;92(B)' The
number 999 a lies to a use not defined under tneSICicode but ma be further defined in
Section 2.00.00 of this code.
£. Permitted Uses
g. Cultural activities and nature ex
!L Public Conservation areas (999) .. ...
f.. Public Parks and Recreation Areas (999)
d. Police & Fire Protection (9221.9224)
e. Recreational Activities. (999)
4.
Section 7.04.00.
~ Lot Size ReQuirements
in accordance with Section 7.04.00.
5.
Off-street parking and 10adinQ reQuirements are subiect to Section 7.06.00.
6.
re uirements are sub "ect to Section 7.09.00.
7. Conditional Uses
g. Telecommunication towers - sub iect to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999)
--------------------------------
Underline is for addition
StFike T~FGyg~ is for deletion
Ordinance #04·003a
Draft #1
Page 3
PRINT DATE: 12/05/03
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
'-'
..J
8.
Accessory Uses
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00. and include the followinQ:
a. Detached sinqle-family dwellinq unit or mobile home. for on-site security purposes. (999)
b. Heliport landin9/takeoff pads. (999)
&:. Restaurants. (Includina the sale of alcoholic beveraaes for on-premisesconsumpfi()n only.) (999)
*********************
CHAPTER \lX
DEVELOPMENT DESIGN AN
STANDARDS
7.04.00
AREA, YARD, HEIGHT, AND
7.04.01
REQUIREMENTS
--------------------------------
Underline is for addition
StFike TIIFGIjIilIl is for deletion
Ordinance #04-003a
Draft #1
Page 4
PRINT DATE: 12/05/03
-
\. r,¡¡i
"wiI
-
>- V)
I- aI
W <!)
0 <!) z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
-I < ....
X D 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 In 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
a ¡:: N N N N I") I") I") I") . I") I") . I") M . I") I") . I") I") .
< w
~ > ::I
0 aI
\J
~ ~ ~ ....... .......
X I- In In In 10 10 10 10 10 .c' 10 10 .c' 10 10 .c' 10 10 .c' 10 10 .c'
< <!) I") I") I") I") I") M I") I") '-' I") I") ìõ' M I") '-' I") I") '-' I") I") '-'
~ :x: 10 10 10 10
I") I") I") I") I")
Q¡ a :c :c ....... :c :c
w
w Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .c 0 0 0 0
0 '-' '-' '-' 0
D ð I") I") N N N N N N N N 0 N N 0 N N 0 N N
.... N N N N N
V) \J
CJ w :c :c :c :c :c
Cl D 0 0 sa 0 sa 10 10 sa 10 10 10 10 10 10 10 10
< " " 9' " " '-' " " '-' " " '-' " " '-'
.... N N ... 0 sa 0 0
>- V) ... ... ...
~
::>
~
H § ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... ....... .......
Z a êñ § :c § § § § :c êñ :c
< 0 10 ~ ~ 10 .c ~ ~ .c ~
H '-' '-' '-' '-' '-' ìõ' '-'
~ w I") 0 ... 10 10 In In ... In In In In In In In ~ ~ In In In
~ a I") ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... - ... - ... ... ... ...
Z I-
W :c :c ....... ....... :c
z 0 0 In 10 10 10 10 In 10 10 In 10 .c 10 10 .c 10 In
:E 0 ìõ' '-' '-' '-' '-'
In 10 N N N N N N N N 10 N N In N N In N N In
W ff N N N N N
a.
H ~ w
:::> <!)
(J ::I D ~
~ < 0 0 8 g .~.. Ig 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
W z 0 z I") I") ... I") I") -0 I") M -0 I") I") -0 M I") -0 I") I") -0
a. .... a 0
0 ~ ff
....J ............
.... ~ ......
I .
Z ~ ii. .
"- ::I ~ >
0 ~ I- 10 In In In 8 .~.... ~ 8 In In § In In 8 In 10 8
w H .... 9 D " " " " " " " " " "
Z .... ... ... ... ...
..J \I) .... ~ ... .\<
CO Z ~ ... ...i. i
~ w
I- :E ~ w ....... ....~. ....... ~. <~ ....... ....... .......
H ::I N 0 0 ~ § § 8. .~ 8. § ~ i § § .... § § .... §,
~ .... ~ -0 -0 '-' §
CJ V) ~ 10. 10 §
.... .!!.
Z l- I") M' ,,' ~' 0' 0 0 0' g~ 0' 0' 0' 0
" .... 0 . .... ... ... .... co ... ... co tiS ... co' ... ... co' ...
c: ~ -I
a \\ >\
W \ .<i .i
N ~ ~ ~ ii .i>
H ::I V)
\I) ~ V) .... u <\ ..¡¡.;. F·i :; In
.... 0 V) < ... ... N N I") · 10 In 0\ \
x ~ z ..... . ...
I- < W ::J < ,. I.i\i \
0 ~ D e.
....J .< 1il < f--
\
I- " l- I- ···~····6 ~
In 0 9 0\ 0
, ...J I ~. I ...J I
N I") · ~ >-
I I I In ~ I- ~ I- ~ I- >-
Z Z .~~ ...J
~ ~ ~ , H H ~
...J W ~ W ~ W
< H H H ~ < ~ < ~ ~
l) 1= ~ ~ ~ 0 II.. Q. II.. Q. ~ ~ .~
... N < < < 0 0
Z I , II.. II.. II.. :1: w ïrl w ...J ~ ïrl UJ w
~ w w w W ...J ~ W ...J ~
W W W Q. > > Q. > Q.
CJ l- I- ...J ...J ...J ...J 1= w 1= w 1= w 1= ~
H < < ~ ~ ~ H CJ CJ
V) l- I- Z Z Z 0:0 ...J ...J ...J CJ ...J
W 0 ::> >- ::> ~ ::> >- ~ .3J ::>
Cl V) V) H H H
.... W W V) V) V) ~ ~ ...J ~ ~ ...J ~
CJ ...J H H H H
< ..1 ..1 ..1 ..1 ..1 ..1 ..1 ~ ..1 ~ ..1 ~ ..1 ~ ;¡¡:
c.Þ Cl < < < < < < < < < < < < < <
::> 1= 1= 1= 1= 1= 1= 1= II.. 1= II.. 1= II.. 1= II..
Z I- w w w 4
...J Z Z Z Z Z Z Z ...J Z ...J Z ...J Z
~ ::> w w w w w w w ~ w ~ w ~ w ,·.<.i.
\,J CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ CJ Z CJ Z CJ Z CJ
2 H H H H H H H H H H H H H H
Cl V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V) V)
~ w w w w w w w w w w
< Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl
-
· 10 In " 0\ ... ~
... ... N N I") ± ...
I I , I I I , I I I I
Cl W W V) V) V) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
< Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl Cl
10M
G)Q
010
~~
...
I::
o
c.
OG)
:eëÞ
"0"0
"0..
CUO
..-
if
::>j
ü.i
!;¿
o
I-
Z
it:
a.
D
CL.
'<
>-
::E
::>
::E
H
Z
H
V') ::E
I-
Z
w
:E
w
ct.
H
=>
(J
W
oct.
.-4-1
,<
I'~
WH
...JV')
~Z
<W
J-~
D
'"'C
s::
a
w
N
H
V')
f-
o
-1
'-"
>-
1-<0 I/)
ow~
-11,/)1-1
X~D
<w-l
<>1-1
<o=>
u<O
~~~~~~.......~333o~~~
00000 0 uo~~~~~oo
T T an an an an ...., T 0 an 0 N T T
- - ...
XI-
<I,/)
~J:
iC)LnLntnSS~oSSS8
T T T T gg~Vgggg
.......
- .......
':::t~'='
~....,o
~ v
Qlffi
wZ
eg
\/)u
00000
N N N N N
15 ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I 2 2
e ~ ~ 8 8 8 ~ ~ 2 2 2 2 2 21 2 2
I/)
~ ~ ~ 2 2 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I 2 2
a ... ...
~ ~
=>D<
~<I-
I-Ioz
¡?¡ao
;e-- f
I-
~ ~ ~- ~
f
an an
N N
15 ~ ~ 15 15 15 15 151
~ ~ ~ ~§i~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
il-F
I-IOD
Z-ll-l
1-1 3;
~
I~I ~ ~ ~ ª 2
~ 2 ~ ..~-- ~ ~ ~ ª ª
~w
i~~
I-I\/)....
ZI-,,!!.
1-10
~-I
§s§§§~§~~
8" ~ 8" 8' 2' ;- ;' ~ ~
~ 8 8
. IX)_ IX). -:
IX) ,... ,... c:
o .-4 ......
- N N
~ >-~
=>\/)I-~
~\/)I-Iu
1-10 I/) <
~~~~
~ De.
I-
t;
~
H
£)
\!)
Z
H
Z
o
N
I-
o
...J
I-
Z D
W 0
~ 0
o :J:
cD ~
~cow
D :J: \,) I-
~~fËa5
H Z 0 ~
~ -:i. -:i. -:i.
~ ~ ~ ~
ŒWW\I)
Z ::E ::E ::>
H ::E ::E D
\I)OOZ
\,) \,) H
,
,
... . .
,
, I
--
--
--
--
.....,
~
o
T
.......
-=-
o
-0
o
N
8
.......
-=-
---
~
....,
õ 2 ~ 8
..... tri
o 0 <'
,...: ,...: '<
Z Z ;;;'
°an 03
tN :o
W ~ I\'Í
\I) 1--_ \I) Z
W wO
W W ~
\I) \I) G
W
\I)
W
W
\I)
an an
N N
--
--
§
0'
N
!
, ;,'
--
I
I- ...J
Z '<
W :
::E Z
~ W
o D
~-
W
~
~
ß H
X Z
H 0
::E \I)
D
W
2
~
o
-0
8
...
§6
.§
o .
N 8
D D
::> CL.
::E H
~ :J:
Z
o
t
~ '<
'< ~
wx
:J: W
...J ...J
'< '<
H H
CL. CL.
I- l-
\/) \I)
::> ::>
D D
Z Z
H H
Z
o
:
'<
~.!::! \I)
W:iS W
:£ 6!. ...J8
o I ...J
~~~\,)Z'<t1
'< '< '< :::J 0 Z '<
CL. CL. CL. '< : 0 u.
~~~~ :,< :~
:555~~~0
~ \,) \,) \,) D '¡g : ~
~~~HZ\I)H
:~~~~OZcD
::> '< '< '< CL. \,) H CL.
æ ~i'"
::EJ:1
~ Z
OW
...JD
W H
> \I)
Ww
D CL.
I:; Z I-
Z 0 Z
::>ZW
DD::E
W w~
Z Z g
Z zw
'< < >
...J ...JW
~ ~ D
Z 0
I.J \,)
:J: í' ~ ~ \,) ..o~ u. D D
~HÄ::>~'~' HCL.::>~
,<~,<CL. ~~
an
.... N LO
c:
o
c.
o CD
E"i
'0'0
'0,-
"'0
¡i
=>j
(OC'J
CDQ
CHI)
~~
W
l-
e(
CI
I-
Z
ã:
a.
;
=
~
CI
CJ
CL
<
>-
:E
::>
:E
....
Z
....
~:E
Z
W
~
W
CL
~
::>
(J
w
OCL
....-'
I~
,,~
W~
..JV>
œZ
<W
I-~
CJ
'"0
c
a
w
N
~
V>
f-
o
-'
'-'
>-
1-11111)
ow~
-I~z
x~Jj
<w-l
<>....
<0::>
\Jill
XI-
<~
::e:1:
Q¡ffi
wz
CJa.
....0
II)\J
w
CJ
....
II)
a.
<
w
a.
I-
Z
o
If
::e ~
::>CJ<
::e<1-
....oz
~a.o
::E... If
::e
~I-¡;
....OCJ
Z-l....
.... ~
::e
::ew
::>N
::e..........
....11)....
Zl-~
....0
::e-l
::e >- ......
::>II)I-~
::ell)....u
....011)<
~~m~
::e CJe.
t;
~
....
o
~
Z
....
Z
o
N
'"
1:
+-
III'
o
.c
III
N
o
01
'2
o
III
'"
:J
o
~
~
Q..
'"
:g
1:
I,J
~'
'"
6 't
~ III
1:....
III
III an
L. .....
01111
",' ,~
III....
~~
g]
L. I,J
ti-6
~~
~ III
o.c
ti ~
] E
'" I:
.S! 0
1!!.. .-
,,12
L..~
0.,_
11.."
8'
~
o
.
I:
o
+=
+- I,J
I: III
III I/)
+-
'" 0
'¡;; +-
I: L.
o III
I,J ....
12 â ~
0"'"
+= '2 ".
~ 0 ~
j§........Vi~
=Q:....o
1111") I: N
~ q ~ ~
I:Õ1:~
!!,.,.¡ I,J >
"i I: '5 0
" .S! :r +-
~ t 1:-&
+- III O·¡¡
'E- I/) :>.:r
L.~:~~
!. ~ +- .-
'" '" g ~
+- +- :J
o I,J 'E en
-:;: ë: ~ I
g:; E"O
.... "0 D- I:
III01.S!.5!
L. I: ~.!!!
o'~ III I:
:J 0 "0 0
go N :>. 12
§ 8 ~ ~
,"0 L.'5
9~.f:r
z
\,J
III
~
+-
~
+-
'i
:>'L.
.c III
8,~
o ~
~ E
> L.
o 0
I,J ti
to!!
-.c
.... 0
o I,J
g,'8:
+- 0
I: III
8~
L. +- .
~~~
E += 8
~ ~ .!!!
.- E ~
~o'::
E+-o
III +- '"
~I,J+-
+- ,!!, ~
~'.g E
._ '" III
:!: III .~
> L. :J
+=03"
g ~ L.
I: I: "0
o '- I:
.- "0 0
t3'"
:J.c"O
"O-a
f<"O
D- I:
1IIa-i~
50'"
±an'E
:J '" III
g '- E
:J ~ III
~ ,_ 0'1
o "0 2
L.'=o
.f.ðE
........
;;:.
3
I,J 0
+=:2
o L.
:J 0
g-¡¡:
1; an'
~8
+=,...:
go-
+=an
-:;
I,J
III
~
+-
L.
III
+-
D-
o
~
\,J
12 I:
~"O
E ~
~¡¡:
:J III
+-"0
§ ~
5-~
o I,J
1:' -6
.S! 0
+- L.
I,J D-
"
"'õ
.!! ~
~ +-
+--:;
.... I,J
o g
~ g-
0"0
~I:
:J 0
D-E
J! .!!!
+-
L.
o
11..
........
..!!.
....¡
\,J
III
~
+-
L.
o
....
"0
"
L.
':;
vi
III
+-
I: :J
~~
51/)
L.
III
N
ïii 0
+- L.
.S!~
§~
.5 .8
£'t
E '"
g~
III 0
.cE~
õ:J'E
~ E III
'" '~ :2
~ 'Ë '"
" III 0
~~1J
w
!<
c
I-
Z
ã:
0.
~.
'"
:J
ïii
+-
o
~
L.
o
ïii
+-
o
E
III
L.
I,J
o
L.
~
,
'"
r
ïii
~
"0
~
"0
III
'"
~
L.
D-
)(
LU
III'
+-
'~
:J ~.
~I") '"
.=.... ::J
ïii. I:
~ 0 0
"0 ,...: +=
III I: g
5.S! L.
E+-+-
L. ~ ~
~I/)õ
I") I: ï:
.........- +-
III "0 ~
~ ,91 11
~ ~ -
+- +- ....
5 ~ 5
11.. :2 11..
12'
o
+=
o
-:;
31
CL
~
'~
¡
o
+-
-g .~
.s!-
~i.,
c\~
:IJi
1i~
:f...... 1
~Vi
6~
I/) 0
oð
~
+-
L.
o
Z
5~
.... :J
't.~ I:
8oð.s!
~~~
III" t ,~
L. 0 12
g Z III
~~ii]
:!:~å.'"
§ .- E 't
+-120111
~ " \,J ....
:J~~Q
0'11:1:'"
.0 III :J ....
I") E ~ 0
1; g- III 5
~ -¡'g ~
'~~ ~ III
~]I/) I:
t~J!~
':,+- :J
§]1; g
.5 .,g ~ ::
~ L. ~ '"
:Elf:; <
~
....
III
L.
........
I,J
.....
"
.....
/'-CO)
Q)~
CHO
æ~
....
:
i c
! c.g
¡ OQ)
I ~~
-0...
1110
...-
j U
j
~
L.
III
t;
~
Õ
L.
+-
I:
III
I,J
~
+-
j
........
::=.
-=
!!!
c
........
~
........
ê
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
'-'
-....I
PART B.
CONFLICTING PROVISIONS.
Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie
County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts there(Jf, in conflict with this
ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent uchconflict.
PART C.
SEVERABILITY .
If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason
inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect
this ordinance or any provision thereof shall beheld to
or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applîcabil
or circumstance.
PART D.
APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANC
This ordinance shall be applicable inithe unin9ôrporate~iC1rea of St. Lucie County.
PART E.
FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENTÖF STATE.
PART
The Clerk
the Bureau ôf
Florida 32304.
herebypir~9t~d forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to
i~trativeqødeq~~Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee,
shall takê effect upon filing with the Department of State.
ADOPTION.
--------------------------------
Underline is for addition
StÄke TIIr:eygR is for deletion
Ordinance #04-003a
Draft #1
Page 8
PRINT DATE: 12/05/03
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~
.."J
After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows:
Chairman Paula Lewis
xxx
Vice Chairman John D. Bruhn
Commissioner Doug Coward
Commissioner Cliff Barnes
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson
PART H.
CODIFICATION.
Provisions of this ordinance shall be incor~øråfe u . County Code and Compiled
Laws, and the word "ordinance" may beçhanged.(tô " rticle", or other appropriate
word, and the sections of this ordin:~?~e may ~~renumb~ relettered to accomplish such
intention; provided, however, thatpqrts B ~.Hrough H ~HQII not be codified.
Chairman
PASSED AND DULY ENACTED this
,2004.
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
--------------------------------
Underline is for addition
S'rike Threl:lgt:! is for deletion
Ordinance #04-003a
Draft #1
Page 9
PRINT DATE: 12/05/03
'-'
.....I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
--------------------------------
Underline is for addition
Strike ThFÐygl! is for deletion
Ordinance #04-003a
Draft #1
Page 10
PRINT DATE: 12/05/03
UtQICIAL~
SUBJECT TO
PLANNING & lO.-·
COMMISSION APPROYAt.
AGENDA ITEM 7: DRAFT ORDINANCE 04-003 - CPUB. CONSERVATION-PUBLIC:
'-'
Mr. Dennis Murphy stated that Agenda Item # 7 was to consider Draft Ordinance 04-003,
which proposes to create a new zoning district to the known as CPUB (Conservation,
PubJic). This zoning district will correspond to the newly created Conservation, PubJic,
Future Land Use Category, which was created as part of recent amendments to the
Comprehensive Plan. The uses within this zoning district are Jimited to parks and other
related conservation / habitat protection uses. This zoning designation would only be
appJied to properties that are in pubJic ownership. Privately held property, even if it is
open to pubJic use, would not be a candidate site for the appJication of this zoning
district. He continued that the purpose of this district is to provide and protect an
environment suitable for the protection, preservation, or enhancement of pubJic lands in
thè community, together with such other uses as may be compatible with the
surroundings.
Staff recommends that you forward Draft Ordinance 04-003 to the Board of County
Commissioners with a recommendation of approval.
Mr. Grande stated that on page 3, Chapter 1, Purpose, should have the "d" from the
second "and" to read "an" and then it would be grammaticany correct. Mr. Grande stated
that the word "protect" or "protection" should also be removed to make it correct. Mr.
Hearn agreed that "protection" should be removed. Mr. Murphy said that would be
corrected.
Mr. Hearn stated that he spent a lot of time reviewing this ordinance over the past month
and has some suggestions of changes. He advised that under permitted uses he would
Jike to eJiminate everything except (b), with the additional wording "including hiking,
canoeing, fishing, bird watching, picnicking, nature exhibits, and an existing uses that are
not negatively affecting the purpose of the pubJic purchase". He continued that under
accessory uses he wou]d Jike to only retain (a) and an of the rest he would Jike to see
moved under conditiona] uses so that the public wou]d have an opportunity to comment
at the time these proposals come before them.
Mr. Grande stated that he thinks those are great suggestions. He questioned if these
changes would be in conflict with those certain properties that have recreational
activities, permitted use (e), already existing. Mr. Murphy stated that he beJieved that
Mr. Hearn's changes pertained to a vacant tract that had nothing on it; these changes
would go into effect. Mr. Hearn agreed and stated that he just wants to be sure the pubJic
has an opportunity to comment on these requests and the only way he saw to accompJish
that was through a conditional use permit. Mr. Murphy confirmed that would be correct.
Mr. Lounds questioned if the piece of cleared property that the County owns at the Port
on the River would have to come through for a conditional use permit before anything
could be done. Mr. Hearn stated that property already has recreational activities on it
now: fishing, picnicking, and those types of activities, so that would not apply. Mr.
Murphy stated that parcel is in the City of Fort Pierce, not the unincorporated County, so
P&Z I LPA Regular Meeting
January 15,2004
Page 15 of 18
U"J·..t~lilAL-
SUB~ TO
PLANNING & ZONlNl
COMMISSION APPROVAl
this ordinance would not apply to that. Mr. Hearn stated that his reasoning behind the
suggested changes was to protect the publics' investment in what they thought they were
buying the land for. Mr. Murphy stated that he would work out some type of wording to
address Mr. Hearn's concerns. He continued that he is a little concerned about the
blanket elimination of some of the items suggested by Mr. Hearn. Mr. Grande stated that
he would favor Mr. Hearn's suggestions by specifically restricting the permitted uses and
making the rest as conditional uses.
'-"
Mr. Lounds questioned what the School Board felt about this matter. Ms. Hensley stated
that her opinion is that the public has the right to access property that they bought and
that there needs to be a balance between how it is maintained and used. She advised that
these discussions have been going on for many years and this is just to make those
discussions more concretely how to proceed without having to go through a cumbersome
process.
Mr. Hearn questioned if Mr. Murphy was comfortable with the language that he had
suggested. Mr. Murphy stated that he understands what Mr. Hearn is trying to achieve
and shouldn't have a problem incorporating those types of changes.
Chairman McCurdy opened the public hearing.
Seeing no one, Chairman McCurdy closed the public hearing.
Mr. Hearn made a motion to approve Draft Ordinance 04-003, as amended, and
forward to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of
approval.
Motion seconded by Mr. Grande.
Mr. Merritt stated that he agrees with Mr. Hearn's intentions but it has been his
experience over the years that the County and the State are good at allowing pepper trees
grow and letting wetlands deteriorate beyond recognition and feels these changes are
worthless. Mr. Hearn stated that he agrees Mr. Merritt's concerns are valid. He
continued that Mr. Steve Fousek from the Environmental Resource Division usually go
out once a month to public lands with volunteers to remove and herbicide exotics and that
his requested changes were to allow the public some input in how public lands are
utilized. Mr. Grande stated that he too agrees with Mr. Merritt but he seconded the
motion because he feels anything that is purchased with public money and held by the
County should be open to public scrutiny and approval before any plans are finalized.
Upon a roll call vote the motion was unanimously approved (with a vote of 8-0) and
forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of
approval.
P&Z I LPA Regular Meeting
January 15,2004
Page 16 of 18
NO~ ¿-: ESTABl..JSHMENT
OR Q-IAPI;E OF REQl..A11ON
. AFFECTN; TI£ USE OF I..AN)
'-'
The St.· Lucie County Board of County
Commissioners propose to adopt the following
Ordinance:
ORDINANCE NO. 04-003
AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST.
LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT
CODE BY CREATING SECTION
3.Ò1.03(EE), CPUB, CONSERVATION -
t'PUBLlC, ZONING DISTRICT· AND· BY
AMENDING SECTION 7.04.01, TABLE 7-
,10 TO PROVIDE FOR MINIMUM lOT
STANOARDSFOR THIS NEW ZO~ING
. ,DISTRICT; PROVIDING CONFLICTING
PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR
SEVERABILITY; , . PROVIDING FOR
,APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING
,·WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE;
PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE;
PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND
PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION
A PUBLIC HEARING on Ordina\1ce 04-003 will
be held before the St. Lucie County Board of
County Commissioners on Tuesday, February
17, 2004, at 7:00 P.M. or as soon
thereafter as possible, in the County
Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the
County Administration Annex, 2300 Virginia
Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FI. Matters affecting your
personal and property rights may be heard and
acted upon. All interested persons are invited
to attend and be heard. Written comments
received in advance of the public hearing will
also be heard.
The purpose of this public hearing is to amend
the St. Lucie County Land Development Code' to
provide for the establishment of the
Conservation - Public, zoning district.
This is the first of two required public hearings.
The second public hearing on this . proposed
amendment will be held on March 2, 2004.
Notification of this second. hearing will bé
published prior to the meeting
If any person decides to appeal any decision
made with respect to any matter considered at
the. meetings or hearings of any board,
committees, commissions, agency, council or
advisory group', that person will need record of
the proceedings and that, for such purpose may
need to ensure that a verbatim record of the
proceedings is made, which record should
include the testimony and evidence upon which
the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of
any party to the proceeding, individuals
testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any
party to the proceeding will be granted an
opportunity to cross-examine any individual
testifying during a hearing upon request.
This· notice dated and executed this 1 st day of
December, 2003.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ~
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ('\\
/5/ Paula Lewis, Chairman V
PUBLISH DATE: February 5, 2004
'--'
'..J
..-
.:J~l
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM
Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest
against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the
area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use
Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County
Commissioners.
The Applicant
Proposes
The Following
Conditional Use:
Major Adjustment to existing Conditional Use Permit to allow for the
expansion of a liquor store.
Regarding Property
Located At:
4900 North Kings Highway (Indrio Crossings Shopping Center).
Currently Zoned:
CG (Commercial, General)
Please Return To:
St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development
Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn
2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: February 10.2004.
/
I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE
I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed
Conditional Use.
Name
(Please Print):
TN ~I '0 Ce.tJs~ /I')j S/ :rñc.
VI) Stã()/eý H :5dr¡ç;Ú!ùy
?Ofo Cãs} t3.Sfh S-/:; Sanfird fì 3;;. 77/
Address:
~--==
Ü -fa." ~y II· r-ecnt:Ú ¡:ÏÃr, PI' ~ s /cle.n-/.
Please note that any for~ returned without. a name a.nd ~ddress will not ~ n~d~d~ 411 ~u~efn~ì ,
forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. U'\ r-----··· -'."'''-'"1 ¡ ,í ! I
I'· "J I
L' ~ '~·;"...I'" ('. r : ;!
¡ ! ¡- C!) - o· , i ~ ,
'L ¿J. .,_..1
.. ..-:--_.'.'-.. .'~~-.'~. "j
;\, ,;t' ¡ l:.- ¿_:,,:~ t';;: d 1
S.lj~JS~_ ~Ç)1L~l.t.:J
Date:
~/6'/o 1£
Signed:
~
Comments:
(FILE NO. CUMJ-04-001 - Ranjana Patel) BY:
~
-
~.
'-
Agenda Request
~
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
5- J
Feb 17, 2004
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ x]
]
[ ]
[ x ]
Quasi-JD [
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
Consider Draft Ordinance 04-003, amending the 5t. Lucie County d Development Code y creating
section 3,01 ,03(EE) Cpub, Conservation - Public, Zoning District and by amending Section 7.04, 1, Table
7-10 to provide for minimum lot standards for this new zoning district
Draft Ordinance 04-003, proposes to Create new Zoning District to be known as Cpub (CON5ERV A TION -
PUBLIC). This Zoning District will correspond to the newty created Conservation Public, Future Land Use
Category, that was created as part of recent amendments to the County Comprehensive Plan, The uses
within this Zoning District are limited to parks and other related conservation! habitat protection uses. This
zoning designation will only be applied to properties that are in public ownership, Privately held property,
even if it is open to public use, would not be a candidate site for the application of this zoning district.
BACKGROUND:
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
On January 15, 2004, the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency for 5t. Lucie County
held a public hearing on this matter. At the conclusion of that hearing, the Board voted 8-0 to recommend
that the County Commission approve Draft Ordinance 04-003. In forwarding this recommendation to the
Board, the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency for St. Lucie County made the
following amendments to parts (2), (7) and (8) of this draft Ordnance,
2. Permitted Uses
a. CIIIII¡ral asti"itiss aAlI Ratllre e~isiti9RS, (999)
b, Public Conservation areas. includina hikina. canoeina. fishina. bird watchina.
cicnickina. nature exhibits and all existina uses that are not neaativelv affectina the
curcose of the cublic curchase" (999)
s, PlIslis ¡;!aFks aRg Resreati9R ^ reas (999)
g, Pelise &. ¡;:ire PFeteGiieR (9:2:21,9:2:24)
e, ResrealieRal ^ sli"ities, (999)
7, Conditional Uses
a, Telecommunication towers - sUbject to the standards of Section 7.10,23 (999)
b, Helioort landina/lakeoff cads. (999\
b, Restaurants, (Includina the sale of alcoholic beveraaes for on-cremises
consumction onlv.\ (999\
8, Accessory Uses
Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following:
a. Detached single-family dwelling unit or mobile home, for on-site security purposes,
(999)
s, PlelipeFt laRgiF1¡1takeelt pags, (999)
s. RestallraRts, (IRSlllgiRg lI:Ie sale ef alsel:lelis severages fer eR premis8s
seRslIR'lptieR eRly.) (999)
RECOMMENDATION:
No action is required from the County Commission at this time, This is the first of two required public
hearings on this matter. The second public hearing on this matter will be held on Tuesday, March 2, 2004,
at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible,
COMMISSION ACTION:
c=J APPROVED
[iJ OTHER
D DENIED
No action required at
this time.
ouglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
.,)J,--
~ .....
Coordination/ Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
(agend772)
....,..",
,.í/I.,
,ø
Agenda Request
"-'
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
s-= /<
Feb 17, 2004
~
/
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ x]
[
[ ]
[ x ]
Quasi-JD [
SUBJECT:
Consider general amendments to the County's zoning maps consiste
changes to the County Future Land Use Maps.
As part of the general amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan that were
reviewed and approved by this Board some time ago, the County made several changes
to the Future Land Use designations effecting a number of publicly owned parcels in the
community. As part of the process to bring the zoning designation of those parcels in
line with the land use designations applied to them, staff has prepared a series of
amendments to the county's zoning maps that address those land use changes.
nt Director
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
BACKGROUND:
The attached map series indicates those areas of the community where these changes
will take place. In general, what we are seeking to do is apply the new Cpub zoning
designation to these areas of the community that have a Cpub (Conservation Public)
Future Land Use designation; apply a utility or industrial designation to those lands
around the airport that currently are zoned for residential use but that have been
acquired by the County for the purposes of airport development or noise abatement
(such as the Ridgehaven Subdivision area); and to apply a more appropriate zoning
designation to a number of existing schools, parks and other public facilities throughout
the County. Because of the areas involved with some of these properties, small-scale
maps are not possible to produce. I have attached several larger scale maps that I
believe adequately highlight the areas under amendment consideration, however if you
have about any of them please let me know.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
On January 15, 2004, the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency for
St. Lucie County held a public hearing to review these amendments; copies of the
minutes of that meeting are attached for your review. At the conclusion of that hearing,
the Board voted 8-0 to recommend that the County Commission approve the indicated
amendments to the County's zoning maps.
The Public Hearing set for February 17, 2004, was intended to be the first of two
scheduled public hearings on this matter. However, we have been advised that some
members of the community felt the published notice for these changes, while complaint
with the County's notification procedures, was not adequate or legible enough in its
published form for all interested persons to understand. Accordingly, at this time I would
request that the Board withhold any action on this matter and we will re-notice the
hearings on this topic with a more pronounced newspaper ad and if the Board feels it
appropriate, mailed notices to all property owners within or adjacent to the effected
areas.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
COMMISSION ACTION:
CJ APPROVED
CXJ OTHER
D DENIED
No action required at
this time.
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
,1.
~,r ,-
~/4::
Coordination/ Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
(agend773)
"'.
'-"
'"
Commission Review: February 17, 2004
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
MEMORANDUM
TO: County Commission
FROM: Community Development Director
DATE: February 11, 2004
SUBJECT: Consider general amendments to the County's zoning maps consistent with recent
changes to the County Future Land Use Maps.
As part of the general amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan that were reviewed and
approved by this Board some time ago, the County made several changes to the Future Land
Use designations effecting a number of publicly owned parcels in the community. As part of the
process to bring the zoning designation of those parcels in line with the land use designations
applied to them, staff has prepared a series of amendments to the county's zoning maps that
address those land use changes.
The attached map series indicates those areas of the community where these changes will take
place. In general, what we are seeking to do is apply the new Cpub zoning designation to these
areas of the community that have a Cpub (Conservation Public) Future Land Use designation;
apply a utility or industrial designation to those lands around the airport that currently are zoned
for residential use but that have been acquired by the County for the purposes of airport
development or noise abatement (such as the Ridgehaven Subdivision area); and to apply a
more appropriate zoning designation to a number of existing schools, parks and other public
facilities throughout the County. Because of the areas involved with some of these properties,
small-scale maps are not possible to produce. I have attached several larger scale maps that I
believe adequately highlight the areas under amendment consideration, however if you have
about any of them please let me know.
On January 15, 2004, the Planning and Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency for St. Lucie
County held a public hearing to review these amendments; copies of the minutes of that meeting
are attached for your review. At the conclusion of that hearing, the Board voted 8-0 to
recommend that the County Commission approve the indicated amendments to the County's
zoning maps.
The Public Hearing set for February 17, 2004, was intended to be the first of two scheduled
public hearings on this matter. However, we have been advised that some members of the
community felt the published notice for these changes, while complaint with the County's
notification procedures, was not adequate or legible enough in its published form for all interested
persons to understand. Accordingly, at this time I would request that the Board withhold any
action on this matter and we will re-notice the hearings on this topic with a more pronounced
~
February 11, 2004
Page 2
Subject:
'wi
Consider general amendments to the County's
zoning maps consistent with recent changes to
the County Future Land Use Maps..
newspaper ad and if the Board feels it appropriate, mailed notices to all property owners within or
adjacent to the effected areas.
If you have any questions, please let us know.
Submitted:
DJMI
ZONINGMAPS1 (H)
cc: County Administrator
County Attorney
Planning Manager
. .
.
.
- --.-,-,"':"--:-.,-..7'"'"----
'7'~ - --____..~~--;_::.,;-:-~-,...~;-::~ -~-;--:--
~ß;:,.èí\:OF.dtjl..íiiØt;·
·'ORCHANGE OF REGUUTION
AFFECTING THE USE OF UND
"""
The . St Lucie County Board' of County
Commissioners proposes to adopt by Resolution
chang,s to ,the zoning designation on certain
parcels of land In the unincorporated area of St.
Lucie County consistent with the amended St.
Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The areas
Involved in this change of zoning are included in
the area shown in the map below. For specific
parcel information, please contact the office of the
S1. Lucie County Community Development Director
at (172) 462-2822.
,i
fi
I ;
I
I
I
I
I
A PUBLIC HEARING on these proposed
amendments will be held before the S1. Lucie
County Board of County Commissioners on
Tuesday, February 17, 2004, at 7:00 P.M. or
a8 800n thereafter as possible, in the County
Commission Chambers. 3rd floor of the
County Administration Annex, 2300 Virginia
Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FI. Matters affecting your
personal and property rights may, be heard and
acted upon. All interested persons are invited to
attend and be heard. Written comments received
in advance of the public hearing will also be heard.
This is the first of two required public hearings.
The second public hearing on this proposed
,amendment will be held on March 2, 2004.
Notification of this second hearing will be published
prior to the meeting :,
If any person decides to appeal any decision made
with respect to any matter considered at the
meetings or hearings of any board, committees,
'commissions, agency, council or advisory group,
that person will need record of the proceedings and
that, for such purpose may rieefl to ensure that a
verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which
record should include the testimony and evidencè
upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the
request of any party to the proceeding, individuals
testifying during a hearing will be swom in. Any
party to the proceeding will be granted an
opportunity to cross-examine any individual
testifying during a hearing upon request.
This notice ·dated and executed this 1st day of
December, 2003.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA \~
. /S/ Paula Lewis, Chairman (' ì
PUBLISH DATE: February 5,2004 V
-'---'-
· ..
.~ qßb1Utt~l;~AL=-
"w' ~ueJEC'r r~
PUmNING &. 7.«J:~¡~8
COr\1\1MïJ;Sm~ !~~;;¡~i\ri~'IU
AGENDA ITEM 8: ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS:
Mr. Dennis Murphy stated that Agenda Item # 8 was to consider certain area wide zoning
reclassifications, consistent with recent amendments to the Future Land Use Maps of the
County's Comprehensive Plan. When the County amended its Comprehensive Plan some
time ago, there were several area wide Future Land Use Map Adjustments made to reflect
major changes in the community, including in particular the amount of lands being
brought into public property ownership. As the Local Planning Agency is aware, we are
now proposing to create a new zoning category of CPUB (Conservation, Public) for the
purpose of more appropriately identifying public properties that are being set aside for
conservation purposes.
Staff recommends that you forward this matter to the Board of County Commissioners
with a recommendation of approval.
Mr. Hearn questioned what the green area to the right of the ST in North 25th ST was.
Mr. Murphy stated it is a park. Mr. Hearn questioned what the white areas on the map
were. Mr. Murphy explained those areas are areas that are not being changed from their
current designation. Mr. Hearn questioned if a map creation date and a legend had been
added to the map yet. Mr. Murphy stated that nothing from this petition was edited or
changed since they last met, but he would make sure it was done for the Board of County
Commissioners meeting. Mr. Hearn questioned what the large blue area to the center of
the map was. Mr. Murphy stated it was the golf course. Mr. Hearn questioned what the
dark gray areas to the north of that were. Mr. Murphy stated that was an industrial area
that was not rezoned when the Minton Ranch properties were acquired and rezoned
industrial for airport purposes. He continued that it was in the County's name and tide
but never got re-classed, so this is taking care of that. He also stated that if you move to
the left, going west, there are additional airport lands that the County owns. Mr. Hearn
questioned if Indrio Road showed on the map. Mr. Murphy stated that it did not because
the map started just south of there.
Chairman McCurdy opened the public hearing.
Seeing no one, Chairman McCurdy closed the public hearing.
Mr. Grande made a motion to approve the area wide zoning reclassification
consistent with recent amendments to the Future Land Use maps of the County's
Comprehensive Plan as presented this evening.
Motion seconded by Mr. Trias.
Upon a roll call vote the motion was unanimously approved (with a vote of 8-0) and
forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of
approval.
P&Z I LPA Regular Meeting
January 15, 2004
Page 17 of 18
~
-
'-'
....",
ITEM NO.6
DATE: February 17. 2004
AGENDA REQUEST
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
REGULAR: (X)
PUBLIC HEARING: ( )
CONSENT: ( )
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ADMINISTRATION
SUBJECT: Purchase of Harbor Branch Shrimp Property
BACKGROUND:
See attached memorandum
FUNDS AVAILABLE: 001-9910-599100-800 General Contingency $10,400
Budget Amendment # 04-137 I CAP 04-082
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff is recommending that we allocate $10,400 from Contingency to perform
appraisals and due diligence as the first step in acquiring this property. Staff is recommending that we
allocate an amount from Contingency not to exceed $10,400 to perform the appraisals and title work on this
property and approve BA #04-137 and CAP 04-082.
o APPROVED
'iOTHER:
o DENIED
Re-agenda for 2/24/04 more
information requested.
COMMISSION ACTION:
Do ~ Anderson
County Administrator
Review and Approvals
º County Attorney:
o Management and Budget:
o Purchasing:
º Originating Dept:
o Other:
º Other:
º Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable:
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 772-462-1777
or TTD 772-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting.
H:\WIN\O WORDIAGENDAWlHBOIAGENDADOC
'-"
J¡
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
MEMORANDUM
04-18
FROM:
Douglas M. Anderson, unty Administrator
TO: Board of County Com
DATE:
February 17, 2004
RE:
Harbor Branch Shrimp Property
The County is interested in purchasing the 93.6 acres Shrimp Property from Harbor Branch
Oceanographic Institute (Harbor Branch), located at 5900 Peacock Road (see attached
map). An executive summary is also attached. This property is approximately 787feet
south of the existing County Fairgrounds.
This property currently consists of 1,306,464 square feet of building area under roof. The
property has been previously used by Harbor Branch to raise shrimp. We have received
preliminary interest from the University of Florida that they would be interested in leasing
back from the County some of the buildings for their aquaculture shrimp program. Also,
Harbor Branch has indicated interest in leasing a small portion of the property back.
As the Fairgrounds Equestrian Center is used for events, we will need stables for horses to
be rented out by the County. This is an ideal location to serve that purpose.
The estimated amount to acquire the property is $3,000,000. The County financial advisor,
Bill Leedy of William R. Hough, has estimated the debt service on a $3,000,000 loan over
20 years to average $230,000 per year including interest.
At the same time, the County is in negotiations with Tropicana Products, Inc., to sell the
methane gas produced at the landfill, which will in turn fire the boiler to produce steam to
pasteurize the juice at their plant. Based upon consumption estimates and weighted
average natural gas prices provided to us by Tropicana's consultants, the projected annual
revenue stream to the County at today's gas prices exceeds $400,000 per year (see
attachment). Should the bottom drop out ofthe natural gas market, the projected revenue
stream would still exceed $300,000 per year. What staff would be recommending, should
we successfully conclude negotiations with Harbor Branch to purchase the Shrimp
Property, would be to use a portion of this natural gas revenue stream to pay the debt
service on the acquisition of the Shrimp Property. All of the remaining revenue received
from the sale of the natural gas would be allocated as the Board deemed necessary.
H:\WIN\O WORDIAGENDAW\HBOIAGENDADOC
"'"
~
Page 2
February 17,2004
HBDI Shrimp Property
County staff has inspected the Harbor Branch Shrimp Property and in addition to the
buildings there is a package water plant with the entire facility being serviced by on-site
underground utilities.
There is also equipment that would come with the property. If the County needs some of
the equipment such as portable generators, the County would retain that equipment, and
the remaining equipment would be auctioned off by the County. This revenue would be
applied against the $3,000,000.
DMAlab 04-18
c: Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney
Pete Keogh, Parks and Recreation Director
Leo Cordeiro, Solid Waste Manager
Suzanne Leffew, General Manager, Harbor Branch
Anita Neal, County Extension Director
Marie Gouin, Management and Budget Director
Joann Riley, Property Acquisitions Manager
Attachments
H:IWINIO WORDIAGENDAWlHBOIAGENDADOC
""
Legend
J¡
, , Subject parcel
D St. Lucie County Fairgrounds
.".,
H'"
'I"
....>
<-I
-
11'111111:
..
"'"
-=
"-
eX)
"-
~
c:
co
1ií
'ë
Q)
1ií
E
'x
e
0.
0.
--oç(---
.,,'
, ,
N
A
o
I
420 840
I I
Feet
1,680
I
'-'
,..---.
-\; .-
._o_...__u___.._.___· -
~
Îj¡j¡jj~ÎijfJilÎjΡM;jr~iÎj¡¡fi.j~¡j~~t¡¡j!¡¡j¡j¡j~j~¡@¡¡ji¡j¡j¡:¡j¡¡jjj¡¡j¡¡¡1¡j¡¡t¡l¡j¡j~¡~:j¡.III.II:(l.~III!!¡~~j:f~:fi.¡Î¡fl~i~¡¡¡j¡j~j:ji:iI¡:¡¡¡jjjI¡j¡j:jI¡j¡¡¡j~j¡¡¡j¡!j!l¡j:j¡j:¡j:¡j¡¡¡!:!:~¡j:j:¡¡:~~¡j:¡:~:¡¡~!:~:~:j!¡¡!:!:::¡:!:~¡:¡j
PROPERTY TYPE
LOCATION
OWNER OF RECORD
DATE OF VALUATION
PURPOSE OF APPRAISAL
PROPERTY DESCRIPTION:
LAND
IMPROVEMENTS
ZONING
r
LAND USE PLAN
HAZARDOUS WASTE
CONDITIONS
FLOOD ZONE
HIGHEST AND BEST USE
-
I ösmeËtuÄeÞiÐ.\JSÄlil$.~~IJ~¡Mm~I::II::¡: I
A hydroponic produce-growing gree~house facility
fotmerlý occupied by Bumac, Produce,! Inc.
5900 Peacock Road, Fort Pierce, Flori~a 34987
Bumac Corporation
48 St. Clair Avenue
Toronto Ortario, Canada M4V3B6
February 26, 2002
To estimate the market value of th~ Fee Simple
Estate of the subject property as of the appraisal
date.
93.6 Acres
A total of 1,236,000 square feet ¡of Hoop and
Sawtooth greenhouses, approximately 70,464
square feet of warehouse, storage bui!lding and shed
building area for a total of 1,306,464! square feet of
building area.
AG-5; Agricultural (1 uniU5 acres),! by St. Lucie
County, Florida
AG-5; Agricultural by St. Lucie County~ Florida
None noted.
"X" Flood M~p #12111C01275F, da~ed August 19,
1991.
To continue agricultural as an in~erim use until
development potential intensifies to . industrial or
commercial.
. '--. .' .--,..- - ~ ..:
'I'
. '
. .
'-'
J¡
St. Lucie County Landfill Project
Gross Revenues to the County from 36% Royalty
Weighted Average Natural Gas Price
Year $6.0000 $5.4853 $5.0000 $4.0000
Current( 1 /20/04)
1 ' $460,631 $421,116 $383,859 $307,087
2 469,360 429,097 391,133 312,907
3 478,209 437,187 398,508 318,806
4 487,178 445,387 405,982 324,786
5 496,268 453,696 413,556 330,845
6 505,477 462,116 421,231 336,985
~
7 514,847 . 470,682 429,039 343,231
8 524,297 479,321 436,914 349,531
9 533,907 488,107 444,922 355,938
10 543,597 496,965 452,997 362,398
11 553,407 505,934 461,173 368,938
12 563,297 .~14,976 469,414 375,532
13 573,308 524,127 477,756 382,205
14 583,718 533,645 486,432 389,146
15 593,729 542,797 494,774 395,819
16 604,140 552,315 503,450 402,760
17 614,550 561 ,832 512,125 409,700
18 625,362 571,716 521,135 416,908
19 635,772 581 ,234 529,810 423,848
20 646,584 591,118 538,820 431 ,056
r
KTM
2/2/2004 36% County Royalty- final.)Çls County revenue
"-
.J,
BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: OMB FOR ADMINISTRATION
PREPARED DATE: 2/12/04
AGENDA DATE: 2/17/04
Land-A raisals
FROM: 001-9910-599100-800
Contin enc
$10,400
REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT:
A raisals and due dili ence for Purchase of Harbor Branch Shrim
CONTINGENCY BALANCE:
THIS AMENDMENT:
REMAINING BALANCE:
$681,358
$10,400
$670,958
DEPARTMENT APPROVAL:
OMB APPROVAL:
BUDGET AMENDMENT #:
DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY:
BA04-137
DEPARTMENT
Approved Budget
Administration
Comm. Dev-Tourism
Central Services
PW /Env Resources
P&RlParks
P&RlParks
Veteran Services
Cultural Affairs
Administration
Administration
P&RlLincoln Park
'-,
FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004
FUNDS APPROVED FROM CONTINGENCY
GENERAL FUND
AMOUNT REMAINING:
$681,358
ITEM
Contingency
Chilled Water System for Thomas J. White Stadium
Treasure Coast Sports Comm (TCSC) Increase
Transcriber/Dual Cassette Reformatter
Chopper/Brush Mower
Fence Repair at Lawnwood F-Ball Stadium
Fence Repair at Pepper Park
Loan for a van. United Veterans will repay.
Treasure Coast Opera Societyl Mini Grant Program
Thomas J. White Stadium Interfund Loan-Field Padding
Research-Education Park
Lincoln Park Community Center Extended Hours
Lincoln Park Community Center Extended Hours
Lincoln Park Community Center Extended Hours
ACCOUNT #
001-9910-599100-800
G/L Interfund Loan ***
BA04-110
001-1925-564000-100
001-3920-564000-300
001-7210-546300-76021
001-7210-546300-700
001-5310-564000-500
001-7310-582000-700
461-75201-563000-700
001-1210-531000-100
001-7216-513000-7102
001-7216-534000-7102
001-7216-552000-7102
Total used:
Balance Available
Proposed action:
Administration Appraisals for Purchase of Harbor Branch Shrimp Property
*** Interfund Loan for the Thomas J. White Stadium Chiller System
Balance Available After Proposed Action:
~
f'MOUNT
1,000,000
$125,000
$25,000
$2,293
$1,913
$12,000
$12,833
$18,189
$20,000
$36,154
$51,000
$2,160
$9,300
$2,800
$318,642
$681,358
$10,400
$670,958
. '
.
~
<C
~
~
:J
tn
I-
o
W
"")
o
no:
Q.
1000
zzz
W
~ I
~ ~I II
I!!U)U)U)
zwww
ë(»>
:E..o..
.. 0 0
... Iwww
~ O>U)
zO-
"~~wO:::j¡j
C!!l I:E a.. 0:::
Wc :Ea..
~z 0«
a..o~u
Wø_W
O:::U)Q,O:::
a..-ee
l!!:Eu
ee~"
cuW
~
C)
z
zõ
Oz
U)::I
0:::1&.
oW
V'lC
V'lZ
cø«
"c)
::I
o
C
~
~
o
~
~
C)
o
no:
Q.
I-
Z
W
~
W
>
o
no:
Q.
~
-
w
en
:>
«
z
w
a::
ec
z
ec
..~ ã:
~z ~
_:E~ ~
......w 0
find ~ W
C3C3ë( !5
ff:EI>~
1-1-
a::: a::
ww
n. n.n.
o 00
a:: za::a::
n. on.n.
n. ¡:::n.n.
~ ~~~
ã: oa::a:::
:x: z:X::X:
en wenen
:x: o::::x::x:
u uu
z I~ z
i )(coi
a::: I a:: a::
g zgg
a:: o a:: a::
ec ¡:::eeec
:X:zU:X::X:
u.~æ!u.u.
°O¡;;oo
wecU)ww
~~~~~
=}~~GG
~ow~~
n.Uzn.n.
...J
~
ii:
<C
o
o
.
o
Q
In
~
Z
:J
o
o
w
-
o
:J
...J
...:
tn
ž -z
o zo
ø 2¡::
:;:.....cc
_...!!:~
..cUo:::u.
W,Wu¡:::
~"'C3fßU)
z~o:::c~
"':I!~"''''
u~ouu
Wee ww
C3 a. t~ C3 C3
O:::W 0:::0:::
a..C a..a..
",.
r
~
o
...I
W
III
...
Z
::I
o
:E
«
...I
...I
¡¡:
U)
W
>
~
I
o
z
J
W
>
ù.i
u
~
z
Õ
0:::
o
in
W
u
:5
a..
u
::::;
III
::I
a.
~
¡
0:::
W
C
Z
::I
U)
W
¡¡:
~
::I
a
...
u
W
C3
0:::
a..
U)
~
>:
ž~
20
...
«~
Uo
9!!i
"'0
ßIt
~~
Ow
f~
00000000000000
00 0
0.... ....
öö 0
0.... ....
o 0
M M
08800000000008
0.... ....
00 0
o ... .-
o 0
ri ('I)
~
U) 0
8
¡..,
o
~
o
It
Q
~oooooooooooooo
00 0
¡ q..... ....
¡:: 8~ ~
~ q 0
w ('I) M
U)
W
U»
Zo«
W~(I)
a. LL ...J
~O~
¡~~
zæ8:
:.;; - ~
...00
::::;zz
w:5:5
0:::
a..
§~
00
0.-
o
ri
(I)
<.>
6:
(I)
;¡!Z
zO
QI=
(l)U
(1)::1
wo:::
LL...
OU)
O::z
11.0
U
I-
Z
W
(I) ~
~ 5
cO
...J w
5w
ØlDgs
~ð~o:::
..JIl.O::w
ª~¡rj!:
o
ø
z
æ
o
I-
Z
Ow
~<.>
zS;
00::
- w
!;( (I)
ø I-
-10
!:::w
~o
~
: 0
;"'"
[ß w
ø <.>
0:::5
~ 11.
<.>~
~ æ
~ ~
011.
0« Z
o!I -
Z (I)
W I-
ø ~
o
8808
....0 ....
00 0
...0 ....
o 0
ri M
o
o
o
0000
~8 ~
00 0
...0 ...
o 0
ri M
o
o
....
o
....
o
M
o
>-
u
z
w
C>
zen
-0
""w
Zw
°u
uo
za::
:>n.
u.z
Zec
wo
C>...J
~
o
o
o
o
~
g
o
o
o
o
o
ci)
:.::
~
:E
W
0:::
C)
It)
It)
(þ
....
·
C)
C)
C)
~
(þ
It)
·
C)
N
"'It
....
·
~
C)
C)
:it
I-
Z
::::)
o
o
o
~
N
00
q
"'It
C)
a.
c:(
o
:it
a
w
D::
a.
I
....
~
is:
c:(
o
02/13/04
F'72\BWARR
FUND
001
001007
001124
001131
001149
001157
001158
001163
001284
001286
001287
001288
001809
101
101002
101003
101006
102
102001
102107
105
.L ,001
107002
107003
107135
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
122
123
126
127
128
130
136
138
139
140
1"f)001
125
'-'
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
.'-t/
WARRANT LIST #22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
FUND SUMMARY
TITLE
General Fund
General-Energy Efficiency Fund
FTA USC Section 5307 FY 99/00
FTA Section 5303 Grant FY01
Section 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning 2004
CSBG Grant FY04
Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab 03/04
Net Loss Commercial Fishing Stories
TRIP Grant FY04
FDCA/EMPA 2004
FDCA/Harardous Materials Grant 2004
TDC Planning Grant FY 03/04
SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04
Transportation Trust Fund
Transportation Trust/80% Constitut
Transportation Trust/Local Option
Transportation Trust/Impact Fees
Unincorporated Services Fund
Drainage Maintenance MSTU
FDOT Bicycle/Ped. Coordinator 03/04
Library Special Grants Fund
Fine & Forfeiture Fund
Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur
Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar
Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper
USDOJ Edward Bryne Drug FY03
River Park I Fund
River Park II Fund
Harmony Heights 3 Fund
Harmony Heights 4 Fund
Sheraton Plaza Fund
Sunland Gardens Fund
Sunrise Park Fund
Paradise Park Fund
Holiday Pines Fund
The Grove Fund
Indian River Estates Fund
Queens Cove Lighting Dist#13 Fund
Southern Oak Estates Lighting
Pine Hollow Street Lighting MSTU
Kings Hwy Industrial Park Lighting
SLC Public Transit MSTU
Monte Carlo Lighting MSTU#4 Fund
Palm Lake Gardens MSTU Fund
Palm Grove Fund
Port & Airport Fund
Port Fund
FAA Noise Compatibility Study Updat
EXPENSES
138,287.04
257,117.49
458.00
27.85
691.18
6,932.25
93.86
10.35
17,150.90
2,610.00
603.00
56.14
96.50
22,854.33
250.00
34,863.50
7,515.24
42,509.45
379.19
103.18
2,203.24
49,944.12
104.02
2,087.58
12,358.91
16,100.00
2,544.98
528.22
210.52
461.87
467.19
513.76
128.12
654.03
762.17
158.55
896.96
264.04
113.47
337.64
444.13
351,990.58
1,340.93
109.77
682.92
3,114.86
5.33
8,541.97
PAGE
1
PAYROLL
531,260.85
0.00
0.00
370.80
5,777.75
1,436.84
1,261.54
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
746.82
1,261.54
118,975.81
0.00
0.00
0.00
49,152.52
5,113.04
1,366.19
1,728.80
66,291.19
1,364.82
27,881.80
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11,539.96
0.00
0.00
02/13/04
F7~WARR
FUND
140319
140320
140325
140330
160
183
183001
183004
183216
185003
185004
310003
310201
316
382
390
401
401225
418
421
441
/'
'-..
451
458
461
471
478
479
481
489
491
505
505001
611
665
\w
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
.,-,
PAGE
2
WARRANT LIST #22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
FUND SUMMARY
TITLE
FDEP-Airport Park Wastewater 01/02
FDOT-Environmental Assessment
Conduct Part 150 Study
Sheriff Department Security Coverag
Plan Maintenance RAD Fund
Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir
Ct Administrator-ArbitrationjMediat
Ct Admin.- Teen Court
OSCA Traffic Infraction FY03j04
FHFA SHIP FY02/03
FHFA SHIP FY03/04
Impact Fees-Public Buildings
FDEP/FRDAP Ancient Oaks
County Capital
Environmental Land Capital Fund
Treasure Cove/Ocean Harbor S Cap
Sanitary Landfill Fund
FDEP Waste Tire Grant FY 04
Golf Course Fund
H.E.W. Utilities Fund
North Hutchinson Island Utilities
NHI Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund
NHI Util - Capital Facilities Fund
S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund
SH Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund
Sports Complex Fund
No County Utility District-Operatin
No Cty Util Dist-Renewal & Replace
No Cty Util Dist-Capital Facilities
Airport Utilities District
Airport Util - Capital Fac ?LL~d
Building Code Fund
Health Insurance Fund
Property/Casualty Insurance Fund
Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund
SLC Art in Public Places Trust Fund
GRk'ID TOTAL:
EXPENSES
PAYROLL
62,437.50
14,616.30
949.11
3,600.00
6,099.36
519.46
180.63
145.68
980.00
184.82
0.00
5,825.30
4,387.50
117,866.93
300.00
497.03
7,056.18
1,242.75
13,074.93
665.33
11,540.86
2.41
3,269.25
54,568.07
4,357.84
25,886.73
3,472.31
1. 20
7,063.70
562.43
1.20
17,261.14
576,346.91
2,740.00
1,699.03
21,900.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
3,362.98
4,617.79
1,171.85
1,970.41
0.00
4,031.00
3,540.70
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
44,306.12
0.00
23,093.62
113.24
2,540.97
32.58
260.66
414.23
146.63
10,693.93
3,163.84
16.29
456.15
32.76
16.29
39,686.06
5,006.34
0.00
4,945.61
0.00
1,960,981.22
979,150.32
'-'
-...",,¡I
02/13/04
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
PAGE
1
F'7l1j3WARR
VOID LIST# 22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
FuÑD: 001
- General Fund
CHECK INVOICE VENDOR
TOTAL
00307492 12408214 Robert's of Florida
16.70
CHECK TOTAL:
109.68
77.01
186.69
00307917 12409599 Fla Power & Light
12409601
FUND TOTAL:
203.39
'-' ....."
02/13/04 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 2
F'7~BWARR VOID LIST# 22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
FU1'IJD: 113 - Harmony Heights 3 Fund
CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL
00307917 12409528 Fla Power & Light 210.52
FUND TOTAL: 210.52
'-' .....,
02/13/04 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 3
F7r..BWARR VOID LIST# 22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
FUliJD : 114 - Harmony Heights 4 Fund
CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL
00307917 12409530 FIa Power & Light 461. 87
FUND TOTAL: 461.87
'-' '-II
02/13/04 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 4
F7~~\À.~ VOID LIST# 22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
Fu!'i'D : 116 - Sunland Gardens Fund
CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL
00307917 12409531 Fla Power & Light 513.76
FUND TOTAL: 513.76
02/13/04
F'7r..BWARR
F'Ul®: 117
CHECK INVOICE VENDOR
00307917 12409533 Fla Power & Light
'-' .....,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 5
VOID LIST# 22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
- Sunrise Park Fund
FUND TOTAL:
TOTAL
128.12
128.12
'-'
....,
02/13/04
F"'1\BWARR
FUÑD: 119
CHECK INVOICE VENDOR
00307917 12409536 Fla Power & Light
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 6
VOID LIST# 22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
- Holiday Pines Fund
FUND TOTAL:
TOTAL
762_17
762.17
'--'
'-..rI
02/13/0';'
F7Z\BWAR_~
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
VOID LIST# 22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
FUÑD: 123 - Queens Cove Lighting Dist#13 Fund
CHECK INVOICE VENDOR
00307917 12409537 FIa Power & Light
TOTAL
264.04
264.04
FUND TOTAL:
PAGE
7
"--' .....,
02/13/04 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 8
F7ZŒWARR VOID LIST# 22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
1< lJL-JD : 127 - Pine Hollow Street Lighting MSTU
CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL
00307917 12409539 Fla Power & Light 337.64
FUND TOTAL: 337.64
'--' ....."
02/13/04 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 9
F7~BWARR VOID LIST# 22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
FU1'-ID: 128 - Kings Hwy Industrial Park Lighting
CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL
00307917 12409543 Fla Power & Light 444.13
FUND TOTAL: 444.13
~ ...,¡
02/13/04 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 10
F'7l\.BWARR VOID LIST# 22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
,
F·ul.-JD: 136 - Monte Carlo Lighting MSTU#4 Fund
CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL
00307917 I2409546 Fla Power & Light 1,340.93
FUND TOTAL: 1,340.93
.'-' '-"
02/13/04 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 11
F'71\BWARR VOID LIST# 22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
F'uÑD: 138 - Palm Lake Gardens MSTU Fund
CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL
00307917 12409553 Fla Power & Light 109.77
FUND TOTAL: 109.77
'- ......,
02/13/04 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE l2
F'71illWARR VOID LIST# 22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
F'uÑD: 140 - Port & Airport Fund
CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL
00307917 12409640 FIa Power & Light 14.93
FUND TOTAL: 14.93
02/13/04
Fn~.BWARR
FUl.-ID:
CHECK
00307216
~
....,,¡
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
VOID LIST# 22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
PAGE 13
390 - Treasure Cove/Ocean Harbor S Cap
INVOICE VENDOR
12407649 FIa Power & Light
TOTAL
497.03
497.03
FUND TOTAL:
~ .."
02/13/04 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 14
F7~BWARR VOID LIST# 22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
F'Ul.-JD: 441 - North Hutchinson Island Utilities
CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL
00307917 12409514 Fla Power & Light 15.65
12409518 45.37
12409519 162.22
12409520 87.26
12409580 206.91
CHECK TOTAL: 517.41
FUND TOTAL: 517.41
"-' ....,.¡
02/13/04 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 15
F7~BWARR VOID LIST# 22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
F"Ul-JD: 451 - S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund
CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL
00307917 12409334 Fla Power & Light 40.73
12409513 39_66
12409517 180.83
12409521 32.01
12409522 21.70
12409523 87.98
12409524 67.16
12409555 145.80
12409557 11.29
12409559 8.71
12409560 41_88
12409562 14.85
12409566 9,356.64
12409569 44.74
12409572 36.29
12409576 179_87
12409577 54.52
12409583 80.14
12409586 29.07
12409588 67.69
12409591 31.84
12409682 43,422.17
CHECK TOTAL: 53,995.57
FUND TOTAL: 53,995.57
'-'
'-'
02/13/04
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD
PAGE 16
F7l\BWARR
VOID LIST# 22- 07-FEB-2004 TO 13-FEB-2004
FU1-JD: 471
- No County Utility District-Operatin
CHECK
INVOICE
VENDOR
TOTAL
00307917 12409286 Fla Power & Light
12409516
12409525
12409526
CHECK TOTAL:
38.50
182.35
77.91
18.22
316.98
FUND TOTAL:
316.98
· .
I
.,
~
....,¡
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
t-2A
2/17/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[X]
[ ]
[ ]
Quasi-JD [
SUBJECT:
Request to approve Budget Amendment No. 04-134 for $5,000 and Equipment
Request No. EQ 04-238 for the purchase of traffic counters.
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Gommissioners
Community Development
BACKGROUND:
Each year the MPO division of the Community Development Department has
... received approval from FDOT to purchase traffic counters with federal funds.
Previous years required an 18% local match from Road and Bridge.
The local match is no longer required. FDOT approved $10,000 in federal funds
for the purchase of traffic counters for this fiscal year, in compliance with the
UPWP plan for transportation planning. $5,000 is already in the approved MPO
budget. The additional $5,000 will be moved through the attached budget
amendment.
The traffic counters will be housed at the Road and Bridge division of Public
, .. Works and paid with 100% federal funding.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
001149-1510-564000-100 - Capital Equipment MPO Grant $5,000
PREVIOUS ACTION:
None.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of BA #04-134 and EQ #04-238 for traffic counters.
[jJ APPROVED
c=J OTHER
D DENIED
Approved 5-0
RRENCE:
COMMISSION ACTION:
ouglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Coordination/ Signatures
County Attorney ~ Mgt. & Budget: ~
Finance.: Fire Dept:
Environ. Resources; Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works:
Other:
Þþ
'--'
'...I
BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM
REQUESTING DEPARTMENT:
PREPARED DATE:
AGENDA DATE:
OMB for Community Development-MPO
02/05/04
02/17/04_
$5,000
~t~ç~¥~~ø1S:~::~+~¡rr:~;\:~~~.
T;NUMBER >,
"~,~",.,,...._.~.,,,;.....~..,,,,.-~.,,,.,.....'
001149-1510-564000-100 Machine
TO:
FROM: 001149-1510-599330-100
001149-151 0-599300-1 ÒÙ '
~
Pro' ect Reserves
Reserves
REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: To reallocate fundin to urchase MPO Traffic Counters.
r
CONTINGENCY BALANCE:
THIS AMENDMENT:
REMAINING BALANCE:
DEPARTMENT APPROVAL:
OMB APPROVAL:
BUDGET AMENDMENT #:
DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY:
na
na
na
\~
BA 04-134
$3,000
$2,000
0
"OD.. 0
ro::2 0
o Q) T'"
O::.s::: I
0
Q)t- 0
.s::: -" 0
- en """
tn 0"0 CO
- c: LO
~ I
~.2 0
WOII:t T'"
c:- LO
Zo O>~ T'"
.- Q) I
00 ¡Z"O 0>
ro~ """
T'"
_N ~~ T'"
tnM 0
"00 0
tno _ 0
:JT'"
-0 ~ Q)
:EN ~ .a
:E~ . ~ "0 ~
....,. Q):;
- 0
O<c 0 § ~
- z
OW ...... o I/) ;:)
U ... 0
~~ or" Q)$
- 0
N I/) c: ~
Q) :J
0 .s::: 0
z<c I- t-,u
.Q)
:JOW Z 01/)
IoU D..~
O~!;( ::æ ::2-
IoU ...
OLLC ~ Q).E
=0>
LL~"" ... c:
D.. o .-
OO(/) _"0
IoU I/) c:
CLL~ « ... :J
$U-
c:
~I-a :J-:
o c:
<ctnw U Q)
u E
OW 0:: lEt
1n:J« ro ro
... a.
~OC - Q)
co Q .
WZ >-1/)1/)
ã)~§
z~W +J L.. __
roo==
:JI-~ E ~.~
,- :J
Xucr
OZ 0:= U
a..o ro
OW o.:JQ)
roD...s:::
W:E Q)Q)-
....s:::"O
_D- .- - Q)
:J .... >
0- goo
:J:J ro c: ...
00.
..JO 0'- a.
- .~ ro
.W 1/»-
.- .- Q) co
- Q 0>
I- I/)Q)"O (\')
~o>:J N
tn I
cr"O .a """
~~~ 0
0
,~"O ~ UJ
.s::: c:
t-ro~
ð
IoU
«
I-
z
IoU
::æ
e:
;:)
a
IoU
.~
--
'-'
...."
!IIfI/I1II'
Agenda Request
Item NumberC-c98
Date: February 17, 2004
Consent
Regular
Public
Presentation
Leg. [ ]
[X ]
[ ]
[ ]
Quasi-JD [
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
Approval of the Commissioner's Award for Art For Nature Spring Plei . Air 2004
\
This yêars Art For Nature Spring Plein Air will be hosted by the Backus Gallery
with an opening reception and auction of paintings donated for the benefit of the
ESL program on March 19, 2004. Last year the Art For Nature Spring Plein Air
artists donated 31 paintings that raised $6,931 for the County's ESL fund. This
year we expect the event to be larger than last years with the potential to raise
greater funds for the preservation of lands through our ESL program.
,bast year, the Commission approved a $100 award for the best painting of lands
purchased through the Environmentally Significant Lands (ESL) program. This
year we are requesting your approval to increase the Commissioner's Award to
$250.00.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
r
OOI-ISIS - ~()""-IOO
N/A
Approve a $250 Commissioners Award for the Best ESL painting created
during the 2004 Art For Nature Spring Plein Air event. The award shall be
given to the artist whose painting best portrays one of the County's ESL sites.
00 APPROVED
c=:J OTHER
CJ DENIED
- Approved 5-0
las M. Anderson
County Administrator
COMMISSION ACTION:
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
JY
Coordination/ Signatures
Mgt. & Budget: ~
Other: ~9
Purchasing:
Other:
(insert file ref)
"".;1"
......
.....",
~
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT
Planning Division
MEMORANDUM
TO:
County Commission
FROM:
Dennis Murphy, Community Development Director
DATE:
February 11, 2004
SUBJECT:
Approval of ..the "Commissioners Award" for the Art For Nature Program
Spring Plein Air 2004
The second annual Art For Nature Spring Plein Air is scheduled with several events occurring
throughout the County in February and March. Art For Nature events promote land preservation
and provide funds for the purchase of lands through the St. Lucie County Environmentally
Significant Lands Program. In addition, the Art for Nature events increase the public's
awareness of the county's' 'Iand preservation program and the recreational opportunities the
County provides. A "Commissioners Award" is suggested to recognize the artist's participation
in the Art For Nature Spring Plein Air event. The painting that best depicts one of the sites
purchased through the ESL program would be granted the award.
This year we are joinin~ with the Backus Gallery as part of their ''Tread Lightly" Exhibition that
will open on March 16t and run through April 3, 2004. The exhibition will focus on Florida's
natural landscapes, with a focus on St. Lucie County. On March 19th a grand opening reception
and auction of paintings donated to the County on March 29th will be held at the Gallery. This is
a wonderful opportunity to support our local art community, promote eco-tourism and further the
goals of our environmental lands program goals.
As part of the Art For Nature event, each artist will donate a framed painting for auction with
proceeds from the auction being deposited into the Art For Nature Fund for the benefit of the
ESL program. Last year the Commission approved a $100 award for the artist of the winning
painting. This1ear staff suggests the Commission approved a $250 award.
Staff recommends the Commission approve a "Commissioner's Award" of $250 for the artists
whose painting best depicts the landscape of an environmentally significant lands site and
authorize the Chairman to present the award to the winning artist.
Please let us know if you have any questions or require additional information.
,
/
~
'-'
'..,¡/
Agenda Request
Item Number è ~ s.: C-
Date' February 17,
. 2004
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[X ]
[ ]
[ ]
Quasi-JD [
BACKGROUND:
Board of County Commissioners Presented By
Community Development \i\A .' ,
--:/ elopme t Di ector
Request approval of the Third Amendment to the Consultant Agreeme (It between
Janus Resealch Inc. and St. Lucie County Board of County Commissionets.
The subject agreement provides for the attendance of the Consultant at an upcoming
public meeting regarding the proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance. The first public
meeting regarding the proposed ordinance was held on January 28, 2004 at the White
City Elementary School. An estimated 100 people attended the meeting and there was
a great deal of discussion on both sides of the issue. Given the high level of interest in
the ordinance, staff has scheduled a second public meeting on February 25, 2004, at
the St. Lucie School House in St. Lucie Village. The third amendment will allow Ellen
...
Uguccioni, Historical Preservation Planner to attend that meeting. The amendment is
attached for your review.
To:
Submitted By:
SUBJECT:
r
Funds are available in account number /O;?~/Slo·531000-100 (Professional
Services).
On May 7, 2002, the Commission approved staff recommendation to award the
Historical Resources RFP to Janus Research Inc.
On December 17, 2002, the Commission approved the First Amendment to the
Consult Agreement to extended the expiration date and include a survey of historic
roadways.
On September 2, 2003, the Commission approved the Second Amendment included
the submission of FMSF forms and attendance at five meetings/hearings regarding
the ordinance.
Approve the Third Amendment to the Consultant Agreement between Janus
Research Inc. and St. Lucie County to include the Consultants attendance at an
additional public meeting regarding the Historical Preservation Ordinance.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
NCURRENCE:
COMMISSION ACTION:
00 APPROVED c=J DENIED
c:::=J OTHER Approved 5-0
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
County Attorney
Originating Dept.:
Finance:
~
Coordination/, ~~~a~r:~
Mgt. & Budget: ~I
Other:
Purchasing:
Other:
(AGEND595a)
~
,.",
,...'
iI'"
Board of County Commission Review: 2/17/04
MEMORANDUM
DEPARTJVlENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Community Development Director
DATE: February 11,2004 '""
SUBJECT: Request approval of the Third Amendment to the Consultant Agreement between
Janus Research Inc., and St. Lucie County that allows for the Consultants
attendance at one additional public meeting.
The Coastal Management Element of the County's Comprehensive Plan requires the County to
implement and strengthen re,gulations that provide for the protection, preservation, or sensitive
reuse of historic resources and to adopt a historic preservation ordinance by 2002. The proposed
St. Lucie County Historic Preservation Ordinance has been drafted and one public meeting was
held on January 28,2004, to present the ordinance to the public. A second public meeting is
scheduled for February 25, 2004 at the St. Lucie School House in St. Lucie Village.
The January 28, 2004 public meeting was held at the White City Elementary School in central St.
Lucie County. About 100 people attended the meeting and there was a great deal of discussion on
both sides of the issue. Ms. Ellen Uguccioni, a Preservation Planner with Janus Research Inc.,
who has 20 years of experience in the area of drafting and implementing Historic Preservation
Ordinances provided a great deal of valuable information to staff and the public during the public
meeting. Although, many issues were adequately addressed, others would benefit from further
discussion. Ms. Uguccinoni's attendance at the upcoming public meeting would be of great benefit
to staff and the public as we continue discussions on the proposed Historical Preservation
Ordinance.
r
Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant approve the attached amendment
to the agreement with Janus Research Inc., to allow the Consultant to atten~ the upcoming
February 25, 2004 public meeting.
If you have any questions, please let me know.
Cc: County Attorney
Press/Public
\ .
'-"
....,¡
THIRD AMENDMENT TO MAY 7, 2002 AGREEMENT
BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND JANUS RESEARCH, INC.
THIS THIRD AMENDMENT mad~ and entered into this _ day of ,2004,
by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision ofthe State of Florida, hereinafter
called (the'''County''), and JANUS RESEARCH, INC., (the "Consultant"):
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, on May 7,2002 the County and the Consultant entered into an Agreement (the
"Agreement") to conduct an Historic Resources Survey for the unincorporated areas ofthe County;
and, ~
WHEREAS, on December 17, 2002, the parties entered into a First Amendment to the
Agreement which extended the time for completion ofthe project to August 30, 2003, and expanded
the scope of the project to also include documentation of all historic roads in the unincorporated
areas of the County; and, ,
'",.
WHEREAS, on September 2, 2003, the parties entered into a Second Amendment which
extended the time for completion ofthe project to Mary 31,2004 and further expanded the scope of
the project to include preparation and submission ofthe Florida Master Site File (FMSF) fonus to
the Division of Historical Resources (DHR) for the six hundred sixty-seven (667) sites identified in
the survey and attendance at public meetingslhearings regarding the proposed Historic Preservation
Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, the County desires the Consultant to attend an additional public meeting
regarding the proposed Historic Preservation Ordinance; and,
WHEREAS, the Consultant is willing and able to perform this additional work as set forth in
the Consultant's proposal dated February 4, 2004, a copy of which is attached hereto and
incorporated 9-erein as Exhibit "D."
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration ofthe mutual promises contained herein, the parties
agree as follows:
1. Paragraph 2. SCOPE OF WORK is amended to read as follows:
2. SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement is
as follows:
-1-
'-" ...J
A. Preparation of Historic Resources Survey as set forth in the Scope of
Work attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A."
B. Submission of Florida Master Site File forms to the Florida
Department ofHistori9~al Resources for each of the six hundred sixty-
seven (667) sites identified in the Historic Resources Survey as set
forth in the Consultant's proposal attached hereto and incorporated
herein as Exhibit "B."
C. Attendance at public meetingslhearings regarding proposed Historic
Preservation Ordinance as set forth in the Consultant's proposal
attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibits "C" and "D."
~
In the event of any conflict between this Agreement and the exhibits, the tenns of this
Agreement shall control.
2. Paragraph 5. COMPENSATION is amended to read as follows:
5. COM~ENSATION
The Consultant shall be compensated for all services rendered under this
Agreement in an amount not to exceed sixty-seven thousand five hundred ninety-six
and 70/100 dollars ($66,596.70) as set forth below:
1. Completion of Task 3 - Twenty-seven thousand
five hundred and 00/100 dollars ($27,500.00)
2. Submission of Draft Report Twenty-two
thousand and 00/100 dollars ($22,000.00)
3.
Submission and Acceptance of Final Historic
Resources Report - Five thousand five hundred
and 00/100 dollars ($5,500.00)
r
4. Submission and Acceptance of Final Historic
Roads Report Seven thousand and 00/100
dollars ($7,000.00)
5. Attendance at public meetings/hearings on
Historic Preservation Ordinance Four
thousand three hundred twenty-five and 70/100
dollars ($4,325.70)
6. Submission of FMSF forms to DHR - One thousand
-2-
f .
~
....,
two hundred seventy-one and 00/100 dollars
($1,271.00)
All reimbursement for travel expenses shall be subject to
the provlslons of Section 112.061, Florida Statues
(2002) . All invoices presented to the County for
payment shall be on a Request for Payment form approved
by, the County.
3. Except as amended herein, the remaining tenns and conditions of the May 7,2002
Agreement, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Consultant has
affixed his, its or their names, or name.
..
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
DEPUTY CLERK '.,
CHAIRMAN
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
COUNTY ATTORNEY
ATTEST: r
JANUS RESEARCH, INC.
BY:
SECRETARY
PRESIDENT
(SEAL)
g: \atty\agreement\contract\3a-j anus. wpd
-3-
I'
--
Exhibit "D"
JANUS RESEARCH
Cost Proposat
St. Lucie County Ordinance Public
Meetings
Project Manager
Principal Investigator
Project Archaeologist
Field Archaeologist
Field Supervisor
Architectural Historian
Historian
Historical Technician
Graphics Specialist
Clerical
Technical Writer/Editor
Technical Administrator
Subtotal
Total Direct Labor
DIRECT EXPENSES
Photogra~y
Photocopies
Project Supplies
Long Distance Telephone
Per Diem
Mileage & Travel
Express Mail
Total Direct Expenses
TOTAL
....
4-Feb-04
;a.
~.,
HOURS
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.00
0.00'
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
11.00
.~
RATE TOTAL
$
99.00 $
$
73.00 $
$
57.00 $
$
35.00 $
$
38.00 $
$ $
59.00 649.00
$
59.00 $
$
38.00 $
$
63.00 $
$
33.00 $
$
63.00 $
$
67.00 $
$649.00
$649.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$0.00
$83.70
$0.00
$83.70
$732.70
· '.
~../
'w'
""'"
Agenda Request
Item Number:
MeetinQ Date:
t~ ....2D
2/17/04
Consent
Regular
Public Hearing
Leg. [ ]
[XX]
[ ]
[ ]
Quasi-JD [
To:
Submitted By:
Board of County Commissioners
Community Development
SUBJ ECT:
Resolution No. 04-32 to accept FDOT federal funds approved 0 February
6, 2004 in the amount of $50,000. These funds will be used to pay 59% of
the North County Charrette Design Study, being held 217/04 through
2/13/04, by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council.
'""
BACKGROUND:
'""
St. Lucie County MPO submitted an amendment for the FY '03/04 UPWP
for additional PL funds to the overall approved budget to include a subtask.
This subtask is a North County Charrette to be conducted by the Treasure
Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) for St. Lucie County. The MPO
is allocated approximately 59% of the total $85,000 charrette cost as a
partner agency (passing funds through to the County as the prime agency).
The TCRPC will be paid with County funds initially with MPO funds
reimbursement in the amount of $50,000.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
Funds to be placed into: 001149-1510-531000-100 -- MPO Professional
Services.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
Board approved the agreement with TCRPC for Design Charrette and
Town Planning Services for North St. Lucie County per contract C04-01-
026, in January 27, 2004.
RECOMMENDATION:
Recommend approval of Resolution No. 04-32, for $50,000.
r
[}!j\ APPROVED
c=J OTHER
D DENIED
Approved 5-0
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
COMMISSION ACTION:
County Attorney
Finance.:
Environ. Resources;
(Y
Coordination/ Signatures
Mgt. & Budget: ~
Fire Dept:
Utility:
Purchasing:
Public Works:
Other:
.". "'~ -'...
"
'w'
"wi
RESOLUTION NO. 04-32
WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the budget for the St. Lucie County Board of County
Commissioners, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption have become available from the Florida
Department of Transportation for the St. Lucie Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO). The Federal
Highway Administration has approved a modificat!on to the current project agreement, increasing the federal
share for the MPO's FY2003/04 Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) by $50,OOO.The Federal Share was
originally established at $597,130, however, this modification authorizes Federal expenditure up to $647,130.
WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the St. Lucie County Board of County
Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds.
~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida,
in meeting assembled this 1 ih day of February, 2004, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such
funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2003-2004, and the budget for the St. Lucie County Board of
County Commissioners is hereby amended as follows:
REVENUES
, .'
001149-1510-331130-100
Federal Transit Admin.
$50,000
APPROPRIATIONS
001149-1510-531000-100
Professional Services
$50,000
After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows:
Commissioner Paula A. Lewis, Chairperson
Commissioner John D. Bruhn, Vice Chairperson
Commissioner Doug Coward
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson
Commissioner Cliff Barnes
xxx
XXX
XXX
XXX
XXX
r
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 17th DAY OF FEBRUARY. 2004.
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
CHAIRMAN
APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS
AND FORM:
COUNTY ATTORNEY
.. ,.- .. -
,I
'-'
....,¡
:\ OF TR~~
f<,~~OI'.oo
...~ 'P
Q:o :;A
«' ?
~~J
(C'C~$
87-"'7ES di to'
U. S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Highway Administration
Florida Division
227 N. Bronough Street, Suite 2015
Tallahassee, Florida 32301
(850) 942-9650
\¡,..-"-'----.fì
, ..--r-, \
FLÛ'RIDA
·'þ~~r'
www.thwa.dó\fov/tlfiv
\\ )
\0.-
February 6,2004
~"
IN REPLY
REFER TO: HPR-FL
Mr. Rick Chesser
District Secretary
Florida Department of Transportation
3400 West Commercial Blvd.
Ft. Lauderdale, Florida 33309-3421
""
fD).rŒ@ŒßWŒ1m
lJù ' ftB _ 9 2004 \ -'
L r>~' "-NT
.--." ···.·~1 ".,....._.
cow~n "'.' 1 r > .:.....~:...~
ST"Li.ië~E éOG,";-{. FL
Attention: Ms. Nancy Zeigler
Dear Mr. Chesser:
Subject: St. Lucie County Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Fiscal Year (FY)
2003/2004 Unified...,Planning Work Program (UPWP) Revisions/Amendment
The following is in response to your staffs letter, dated February 3, 2004, transmitting a
request from the St. Lucie County MPO to amend its FY 03/04 UPWP for our review.
Specifically, this request involves proposed amendments to Task 3.8, Special Project
Planning, to add a subtask and an additional $50,000 in federal PL funds to the task and
overall budget; and to increase the state match in Task 3.1.1 by $11,028. The added
subtask is a north county charrette to be conducted by the Treasure Coast Regional
Planning Council (TCRPC) for St. Lucie County.
Based on our review of the request above and the Department's recommendation, we
hereby approve the subtask addition and the overall budget increase of $50,000 in PL
funds to Task 3.8, the increase to Task 3.1.1 as noted above.
However, with regard to Task 3.8, we also support the Department's recommendation of
the conditionsfor approval stated below:
(1) The revised budget for Task 3.8 reflects the full MPO share of the charrette cost
even though the revised task text indicates work on the project will extend into
FY 2004/05. The balance remaining in the task budget at the end of the fiscal year
needs to be sufficient to cover any remaining work to be completed under the
FY 2004/05 UPWP.
(2) The scope for the charrette does not mention the St. Lucie MPO. The MPO should
have independent representation on the Charrette Steering Committee and be
assured access to the project deliverables. The progress reports for quarters during
which work is completed need to provide details on the outreach conducted to
maximize public participation and the nature and level of MPO involvement in the
project.
~ . -. y
f
......
Mr. Rick Chesser
February 6, 2004
..."
2
(3) Federal PL funds will not supplant any local funds originally designated for the
project. .
(4) The TCRPC should be paid first with county funds given the short turnaround time
provided for amendment review and authorization of additional federal PL funds.
The Department received the proposed~ámendment on January 26, 2004, and the
project is scheduled to begin as early as February 7,2004. MPO staff has been
advised that the MPO is prohibited from incurring costs or making payments relating
to the charrette until it receives notice that the $50,000 in additional federal PL funds
requested for the project has been authorized for expenditure.
If you have any questions, please contact Ms. Lee Ann Jacobs at (850) 942-9650,
extension 3013.
...
Sincerely,
'..
/s/ Lee Ann Jacobs
For: James E. S1. John
Division Administrator
cc: Ms. Elizabeth Martin, FTA (Region 4)
Mr. Henry Lewis, Jr., FOOT (MS-21)
Mr.-Rob Magee, FOOT (MS-28)
Ms. Lois Bush, FOOT (District 4)
Ms. Cheri Fitzgerald, S1. Lucie County MPO
r
AGENDA REQUEST
.....,
ITEM NO. --3A-
~
,
\w'
DATE: February 17, 2004
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [x]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney
Daniel S. McIntyre
County Attorney
SUBJECT:
Resolution 04-57 - Permanent Slope Easement
Lennard Road MSBU
Frank and Sandra Lagana
Parcel 23 - Tax I. D. #3414-501-0608-000/0
BACKGROUND:
A Contract for Sale and Purchase for right-of-way on Lennard Road was
approved by the Board on October 7, 2003. For the purpose of tying in and
harmonizing the property with the roadway, a Permanent Slope Easement was
needed which Mr. and Mrs. Lagana have donated to the County.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION: On October 7. 2003 - the Board approved a Contract for Sale and Purchase
of right-of-way needed from Mr. and Mrs. Lagana for the Lennard Road MSBU
project.
June 6. 2000 - Initial Public Hearing held. Board of County Commissioners
approved the Lennard Road MSBU project to provide roadway, water and sewer
improvements and authorized staff to proceed with design and permitting.
November. 2001 - Second Public Hearing held. Adopted Preliminary
Assessment Roll. Approval to commence construction.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute
Resolution No. 04-57 accepting the Permanent Slope Easement and instruct
staff to record Resolution No. 04-57 in the Public Records of St. Lucie
County, Florida.
[X APPROVED [ ] DENIED
[ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0
-
COMMISSION ACTION:
Do glas M. Anderson
County Administrator
[x ] Originating Dept: .Jrt-.'-
Review and ADDrovals
[x) ',bli, w""'~ [x] E"9;'Ud"'J.1VP
[ ] Road and Bridge: [ ] Community Dev:
[XJ C,",ty Att,,",y' ~
'-'
..."
i
"
\
,f
.~
<-
'ì
'-,~ '
~:.
{:.. .
_1~r
~Q-"._" "
JitiliP¡
1··.·_1I_1-.~·,,_·., ~,._,.-,. "
~i~::,;£]:L~__~.~
~
r
.r.1 r............r·==
t' t' ;--...-,~,
1>':.. . . '::--
/;::... '~/:~>~~'~~~;1', ~/ .¡
J ~ ;,:. \' ,~-_(j I ·b:::¥:s:-~~~;~.g
~I ...:.n, ~ :-TJ.\--J"~:~ ___ __ -,,,,~=,,,,~,Ji:'>, ""..
\:r~ I ,.., .~,·~~~.~.~-.':S:,:.:JI·
_ (~~\ c:~. ,,~ .~~:t:-:.,;~l
,) . ~~ \ \""(, ~ ~-? . '''I . ·ë;'~3~i:,:·?:;·]
~ \ I .10 {I ~, 'L-·-..,m ."'..J
\~, ~~, ,r;-..r. . J
,;., 1.( r-, ''''k. . .., '. \.
\. , 'j ¡:::"<---'-'
\~ ;, ':', . I
".
, .
: ,p~
:J:
4'.';." .
TifÎbn~ RO~d
(LentJarc Road)
:.~~..
"'¡
')
..'~_'" ... . - '. ~'" . .t.
;",
:t~--...·;··
,-
;
¡.. 'r-
. ";-;:'(-
. f:~;~- ..~t:- .¡~.'~~:
~ ,_ ".N
....
,..,....
v¿.~~
_·JZ~ '-'~jíIÇ:~)
--:""::''''''1'¡::'-~ /....~L.. .,
!~J ) L. ~ ~ ~-"i.;
~ ¡-,...:. ~ . ¡ ~","",'" 1-
,'\ ~~:JJ
--lifÆ ¡ ¡
;:e ¡ t
,~ ¡ t
.,ç;". ~'r, ~
~~t~~·~:J.r ~
._.."...._-~..-
,;.'.-....
t~~l~:
\'~.....--r~.,:~-.
. '. ...~-..
. ~~.
~r
r'Tt
'I,·j,
~:i. , ':_ ~:I""
. -ir~1J:
,i.u.
.. ./..è'å"
,'é·
.:t~.:
..-.......
,
'.
··oJ···...
,
,"'"
. "".
"~""
\\\ :
':\\t. :~ .
Ii', .
_..:_;...,L_ -'~.:~f~,·
-
~.,'... .
FI
r,,~ .,,-" ;
, '
j
î>,c.,J ;~.:f~~
%
;~~~
Pdrt SÞ. -I!.uÖle- ,"-,: I
.-Higb ~~SémØ:Ö¡;¡'~'
':~j~jjj;)l~i~t~J
. ,;
....>.,.J_".
~if-: M ......
~~~~~;
. ~~::lr§~ ;'
C>..ò _
J
.. 'r,
~:Ii.r~~ti.%~~h~;.
\'\
....."..
PROPOSED LENNARD ROAD
OK ,.
11::'1 ¡i
i;;¡
w\
\.,;
...J
¡
i
"
.... ............
",
~ I :í
¥ !.
" !J
3
I
'~I' ,"
11~"i
Il! x
VI I'rl it
'" I!¡~III
>- lifXr I'
o II~I' ¡"
z b,d ilB
lilt, ~ .
,:tÎI xd
.
'.
",
",
v~
~;I~I
o. I
~
i I
~
:t
~
:t
vi
:::i
. N_
... ~ '
'U 01 _
.. : i
=>
III
VI
:::E
!if
o
0:
o
~
Z
Z
'"
-'
o
....
VI
o
a.
o
0:
a.
I I: Iii
, ! ¡ ! ! ¡
i ¡!! ¡
j i j i i
j j j ¡ i
¡! i ¡ f
. !!!!!
: I ¡ II ¡
~ i ¡ i ¡ i
." ;;;;;
; I ¡ ! ¡ i
:; ! Ii! I
. ¡I! i!
I! III
!!!! i
! ! ! II
II ¡I.
f.1 IIi
i !Ih
II
I'" Z
Q. -
Q.Z
w
Q.
-'
::>
\!T
\w'
.....,
RESOLUTION NO. 04-57
A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A PERMANENT SLOPE EASEMENT
ON BEHALF OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County,
Florida, that:
The foregoing Permanent Slope Easement is duly accepted on behalf of St. Lucie
County this l¡th day of FEBRUARY, 2004.
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
Chairman
ATTEST:
Deputy Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
BY:
County Attorney
G:\ACQ\WP\Janet\Lennard Rd\Lagna\Res. 04-57 Permanent Slope Easement.wpd
\w
""'"
This instrument prepared by
Janet liCausi under the direction of:
Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney
St. Lucie County
2300 Virginia Ave.
Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
PROJECT:
PARCEL:
PARCEL ID NO:
Lennard Road MSBU
Parcel 23 - Lagna
Tax I.D. 3414-501-0608-000/0
PERMANENT SLOPE EASEMENT
THIS EASEMENT, made this _ day of ,2003, by FRANK LAGANA.
AND SANDRA F. LAGANA, his wife, whose address is 701 SW Stuart West Blvd. Palm City. FL.
34990-5939, hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR, and ST. LUCIE COUNTY. a Political Subdivision
of the State of Florida. 2300 Virginia Ave.. Fort Pierce. Florida. hereinafter referred to as
GRANTEE.
WITNESSETH
That the grantor, for and in consideration ofTen ($10.00) Dollars and other good and valuable
consideration do(es) hereby give, grant, bargain and release to grantee, its agents, assigns, contractors
and sub-contractors, a Permanent Slope Easement for the use of the general public to construct, install,
maintain, operate, upgrade, replace, and renew, from time to time, back slopes upon, along, over, and
across the following described land in St. Lucie County, Florida, more particularly described as:
SEE EXHIBIT" A" -" A-1"
TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same unto the Grantee, its successors and assigned forever.
The Grantee may remove, cut or trim trees, bushes, and saplings growing upon or extending over
said strip of land so far as may be reasonably necessary in the installation, maintenance, operation,
repair, replacement, or renewal of any of the above mentioned improvements.
Subject to the provisions of Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, Grantee agrees to indemnify and
hold harmless Grantor from and against any. actions at law to recover damages in tort for money
damages for injury or loss of property, personal injury, or death arising out of the installation"
maintenance, operation, repair, replacement, or renewal of said facilities;and the equipment connected
therewith, over, and across said strip of land and caused by the negligent or wrongful act or omission
of any employee of Grantee while acting within the scope of his or her office or employment under
circumstances in which Grantee, if a private person, would beliable to the claimant, in accordance with
the general laws of the State of Florida.
The undersigned hereby covenant and warrant that they own the said land and have the right
togrant this easement.
~
--
IN WIT..UNESS WHERE¿. the underæ~raritors have hereunto set their hands and seals this
\ -\ day of ,é'P'Ytf'\. / 2003.
Signed, sealed, and delivered
in our presence wit ss s'
~
t~ ~. ~.
Frank W. Lagana
Witness
jJÞ/1~~
Sandra F. Lagana
Witness
State of ~~
County of f<n J
(NOTARY PUBLIC SEAL)
.,'~-;¡"\""/'/" Lesa 1 Murphy
t:1~"¡~ MYCOMMISOON# 00134173 EXPIRES
?..... ~l My' 142006
~t;,C¡'f.,t{ aoNDED1ItIUTIiOY'AIH INIUIIAHa, INC
p{2--
Ut- ,2003/
(type of
Commission No.:
tf)13~/b
1-/lo-O (p
L~ f.~\JjþI!V,
(Printed, Typed or Stamped Na-fue of
Notary Public)
My Commission Expires:
"- ..."",
EXHIBIT "a"
DESCRIPTION
That part of the North 1/2 of Lot 8, Block 2, plot of ST. LUCIE GARDENS, as recorded in Plat Book 1 Page
35 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida lying within the following described parcel: '
A 10' wide Permanent Slope Easement lying in the North 1/2 of Sectian 23, Township 36 South, Range 40
East, St. Lucie County, Florida and being the Easterly 10.00 feet of lands lying 75.00 feet Easterly of the
following described centerline for Lennard Road:
For a point' of reference, c,ommence at a found 4"·x4" concrete monument (unnumbered) marking the
Southwest corner. of the Southeast ~ of said Section 23; thence NOO'09'09"W olong the West line of the
Southeast ~ of said Section 23, a distance of 2621.57 feet to a point lying 25.00 feet South of a found ~"
iron pipe (unnumbered) marking the Northwest corner of the Southeost ~ of said Section 23 and an .'
int.ersection .with t~e centerline for Lennord Road. at cent.erline. station 323+38.52; thence S89'59'21"E along
said cente.rllne a distance of 66~.29 feet ~o .an intersection wl~h the East line of Lot 7, Block 4 of said plat
of St. Lucie Gardens and the pOint of beginning of the centerline for Lennard Road at centerline station
316+ 73.23 .
Thence N89'59'21"W, parallel with said North line of the Southeast ~ of said Section 23 a distance of
665.29 feet to centerline station 323+38.52 and an intersection with the West line of the Southeast ~of
said Section 23 and the centerline of Silver Oak Drive a 100 foot wide right-of-way; thence continue
N89'59'21"W, parallel with soid North line of said Section 23, a distance of 1518.63 feet to centerline station
338+57.15 and a point of curvature of a curve concave to the Northeast having a radius of 1065.00 feet
and a central angle of 4715'17", thence Narthwes,terly along the arc of said curve a distance of 878.36 feet
to a point at centerline station 347+35.50 and a point hereafter referred to as point "A", a chord bearing
to said point bears N66'21'42"W, with a chord distance of 853.67 feet; thence continue along said curve
concave to the Northeast having a rodiÙs of 1065.00 feet and a central angle of 42'28'58", thence
Northwesterly along the arc of said curve a distance of 789.66 feet to centerline station 355+25.16 and a
point lying 65.00 feet East of the West line of the Northwest ~ of said Section 23 and a point of tangency,
a chord bearing to said point bears N21'29'35"W, with a chord distance of 771.70 feet; thence N0015'06"W,
parallel with said West line a distance of 1618.06 feet to centerline station 371+43.22 and an intersection
with the South line of the Southwesf 1/4 of said Section 14; thence NOO'07'46"W, a distance of 237.69 feet
to centerline station 373+80.91 and a point of curvature of a curve concove to the Southwest having a
radius of 7000.00 feet and a central angle of 07'48'51", thence Northwesterly along the arc of said curve a
distance of 954.68 feet to a point of reverse curvature at centerline station 383+35.59 and a point lying on
the East line of the Southeast ~ of said Section 15, a chord bearing to said point bears N04'02'12"W,- with
a chord distance of 953.94 feet; Thence along reverse curve, concave to the Northeast having a radius of
7000.00 feet and a central angle of 07'48'51", thence Northerly along the arc of said curve a ,distance of
954.68 feet to centerline station 392+90.27 and a point of tangency and a point lying 65.00 feet West of
the West line of said Section 15, a chord bearing to said point bears N04'02'12"W, with a chord distance of
953.94 feet; thence NOO'07'46"W parallel with said East line of said Section 15, a distance of 497.12 feet to
centerline station 397+87.39 and a point on the North line of said Southeast ~ of said Section 15; thence
NOO'05'24"W, a distonce of 200.15 feet to centerline station 399+87.55 and a point of curvature of a curve
concave to the Southwest having a radius of 1065.00 feet ond a central angle of 45'30'16", thence
Northwesterly along the arc of said curve a distance of 845.82 feet to centerline station 408+33.37 and a
point of tangency. a chord bearing to said point bears N22'51'31 "W, with a chord distance of 823.77 feet;
thence N45"36'39"W, a distance of 508.57 feet to centerline stotion 413+42.04 and a point lying on the
North line, of the South ~, of the Northeast K. of said Section 15 and the point of terminus, of the
cen terline for Lennard Road, said lands lying 65.00 feet each side of the above described center line also
terminate at said North line of the South ~ of the Northeost ~ of said Section 15. For a point of reference
from the terminating centerline station 413+42.04; thence N89'46'39"E along the North line of the South ~
of the Northeast ~ of said Section 15, a distance of 746.43 feet to a point lying on the East line of the
Northeast ~ of said Section 15; ,Thence NOO'06'24"W along said East line, a distance of 1317.68 feet to a
found 4"x4" concrete monument (unnumbered) marking the Northeast corner of said Section 15.
Sheet 1 of 2
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION
OF
PSE "823"
File: 0084HC.dwg
Date: 3/18/02
Revised: 11/23/02
C"f~~~~:~.:
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
&:
LAND SURVEYORS
2980 SOUTl-l 25th STREET
FORT PIERCE. FLORIDA 34981
(561) 4-64--J537
Prepared For
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Tech: ERM
,-..
~
o 100 200
I ' , , I
SCALE IN FEET
exhibit "A_1" .
SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY
DESCRIPTION
N001S'OS"W I
WEST UNE Of" 11-IE NOR11-I 1/2/ 1---1
, Of" SECTION 2.1,
TOWNSHIP .16S.
RANCE +OE .
. 65'
is'
ROAD R/W '
PER PLAT
ST. LUOE GAROENS
(PB.I, PG. .15)
NOO"15'06"W
331.67'
PSE 823
(:1:0.076 ACRES)
I:
LEGEND
PSE = PERMANENT SLOPE EASEMENT
6. = DELTA
R = RADIUS
L = ARC LENGTI-i
PG = PAGE
PB = PLAT BOOK -l
ORB = OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK REQUIRED R/W ' .
POB = POINT OF BEGINNING
P~C = POINT OF COMMENCEMENT
PLS = PROFESSIONAL LAND SURVEYOR
R\W = RIGHT-OF-WAY
~ = CENTERLINE
± = PLUS OR MINUS
sq. ft. = SQUARE FEET
TI-iE WEST UNE OF TI-iE NORTI-i 1/2 OF· SECTION 23
IS ASSUMED TO BEAR NOOïS'OS"W AND ALL OTI-iER .
BEARINGS SHOWN HEREON ARE RELATIVE TI-iERETO.
REVISION No.1 - REDUCED WlD11-I TO 10' - 6/12/0.1
SKETCH OF DESCRIPTION
OF
PSE "823"
File: 0084HC.dwg
Date: 3/18/02
Revised: 11/23/02
Prepared For
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
Tech: ERM
Î
I ", LOT 7
L- EASETERL Y 75'
I
--.! ~ EASTERLY 10'
65' I
I
I
I
N89"55'17"E
1 0.00'
NOO"15'06"W
331.67'
NORTH 1/2 OF LOT 8
BLOCK 2
SECTION 23
ST. LUCIE GARDENS
(PB. 1, PG: 35)
10' PERMANENT
SLOPE EASEMENT
N89"56'10"E
10.00' .
I
I
,I
I
II
I
I
I
'I
II
II
I
L R''''''RED R/W
SOUTH 1 /2 OF LOT 8'
LOT 9
P.T. STA
.155+ 25. 16
PROPOSED CENTERUNE
Sheet 2 of 2
ClF~~~~~~,~
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
&:
LAND SURVEYORS
2960 SOU11-l 25th STREET
FORT PIERCE. FLORIDA .34961
(561) +<;4-.35.17
.....,
ITEM NO. C4a
DATE: February 17, 2004
AGENDA REQUEST
REGULAR: ( )
PUBLIC HEARING: ( )
CONSENT: (X)
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
~~~.~~
Public Works Director
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS - ADMIN
SUBJECT: Work Authorization No.4 with BCI Engineers and Scientist, Inc. for Design of Upland
Material Management Area (Spoilsite) for Taylor Creek Dredging.
BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County has been working since 1998 to prepare design plans and secure
permits for the restoration dredging of Taylor Creek, adjacent to the Port of Fort Pierce. The County
has secured permits for the dredging of Phase I of Taylor Creek, that will involve dredging the
navigational channel between the FEC Railroad Bridge and the Intracoastal Waterway.
The dredging will remove approximately 90,000 cubic yards of spoil material to a depth of 12.5 feet
below mean low water. The dredged spoil material will be pumped to a self-contained temporary,
bermed upland disposal site located on the Bell Property at the Port of Fort Pierce. The spoil material
will be hauled from the Bell Property to the St. Lucie County Landfill on Glades Cut-off Road.
Currently, Public Works Staff is working with BCI Engineers to design the upland spoil site. The
attached Work Authorization includes all of the soil sampling, surveying, and engineering design work
that is required to prepare construction drawings for the upland spoil site.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in the Port Fund-Taylor Creek-140001-4315-563005-4657.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
3/9/99: Approval of Work Authorization #11 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of 11,000 for
preparation of FIND Grant.
5/4/99: Approval of Work Authorization #12 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $25,220 for
spoil site selection process.
2/15/00: Approval of Work Authorization #13 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $86,900
for sediment testing and analysis.
3/7/00: Approval of Work Authorization #14 with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner in the amount of $32,200 for
a hydrogeologic study of the groundwater at the Seminole property.
5/1/01: Approval of Work Authorization #1 with BCI in the amount of $137,000 for design and permitting
of Taylor Creek Project.
2/5102: Approval of Work Authorization #2 with BCI in the amount of $33,050 for the Taylor Creek
Restoration Dredging Project Shoreline Stabilization and Improvements Reach 2.
3/5/02: Approval of Work Authorization #3 with BCI Engineers, Inc. in the amount of $17,500 for cost
analysis and grant application preparation and submittal to FIND and SJRWMD.
8/22/03: PO #2313380 for Arc Surveying for Hydrographic Survey in the amount of $18,500.
8/22/03: PO #2313388 for Elab for Analytical Services in the amount of $18,894.00.
~
'-'
'...I
8/22/03: PO # 2313379 for Scientific Environmental Services for Soil Sampling in the amount of
$10,050.00.
9/30/03: PO #2313589 for Dredging & Marine Consultants, Inc. for Grant Coordination and Permit
Finalization in the amount of $19,990.00.
2/04/04: Approval of contract with DMC Engineering in the amount of $24,970.00 for preparation of bid
documents & specifications.
RECOMMENDATION: Public Works Staff recommends approval of Work Authorization No.4 with BCI
Engineers and Scientists, Inc. in the amount of $7494.00 for design of Upland Material Management
area for Taylor Creek Dredging and authorization for signature by the Chairman.
COMMISSION ACTION:
XI APPROVED
'" rr OTHER:
o DENIED
Approved 5-0
glas Anderson
County Administrator
Review and AD~Ls
. Originating Dept: (Pub. Wk..) ~:. County Attorney. . . --. .
181 Purchasing: ~(D arks & Recreation:
" I 181 Management and BUdget:k..J)h/ttl1
o Environmental Lands:
181 Finance:
o Other
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the S1. Lucie County Community Services Manager
at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting.
'-"
..."
WORK AUTHORIZATION NO.4
Engineering Services
Related to Dredging
COO-06-550
for
Taylor CreeklC25 Dredging and Restoration Project
Construction Plans and Specifications for Upland Material Management Area
Pursuant to that certain Agreement Between County and Engineer for Engineering
Services (the "Agreement") between S1. Lucie County (the "County") and BCI Engineers &
Scientists, Inc.(the "Engineer") dated June 13, 2000, the Engineer agrees to provide the
Scope of Services described in Exhibit "A" and for the Compensation described in Exhibit
"B". All services provided under this Work Authorization shall be completed according to
the schedule described in Exhibit "C".
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Engineer
has affixed his, its, or their names, or name, on the dates below.
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
CHAI RMAN
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
COUNTY ATTORNEY
WITNESSES:
ENGINEER
BY:
Print Name:
BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc.
Date:
~
...,.¡
£:2Þ 4J..- -= _
ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS, INC.
January 30,2004
BCl Project No. 19-10801.3
Mr. Don West, P.E.
County Engineer
St. Lucie County
2300 Virginia Avenue, Room 229
Ft. Pierce, FL 34982-5652
Re: Taylor Creek Disposal Site
Construction Drawings and Specifications
Dear Mr. West;
Following your request, we have prepared a Scope of Services (Exhibit A), Project Cost
Estimate (Exhibit B), and a project schedule (Exhibit C) for engineering services to prepare
construction plans and specifications for construction of the Upland Disposal Area at the TayJor
Creek Restoration Dredging Project, Phase I. We are requesting a Work Authorization in the amount
of$7,493 to conduct the required investigation and studies and to prepare the plans and specifications
required for soliciting bids for the project.
fõ)Œ@ŒUWŒfò}
un FEB - 6 lm4 æJ
ENGINEERING
We understand the critical timing for completion of this work, and would appreciate receiving
the Work Authorization as soon as practical.
We look forward to continuing our work on this interesting and important project for St.
Lucie County. lfthere.are any questions, or items that we need to discuss in more detail, please call.
Sincerely,
BCI ENGINEERS & SCIENTISTS, INC.
r
~ff~
Leslie G. Bromwell, Sc.D., P.E.
Principal Engineer
LGB;kk
cc: Shailesh Patel, M.Sc.,CPSSc.
2000 E. Edgewood Drive, Suite 215, Lakeland, Florida . Post Office Box 5467, Lakeland, Florida 33807-5467
863-667-2345. Fax 863-667-2662. www.bcieng.com
'-'
.."
EXHIBIT A
ST. LUCIE COUNTY ENGINEERING DIVISION
Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging Project Phase I
Preparation of Construction Plans and Specifications
For Upland Material Management Area
Scope of Services
I. Description
Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging Project, Phase I
Construction Plans and Specifications for Upland Material Management Area
II. Provisions for Work
Engineering services will be accomplished in accordance with the St. Lucie County Continuing
Engineering Services Contract.
III. Scope of Services
BCI will provide project management and engineering services using staff and resources
from our Lakeland office to provide full technical support to St. Lucie County and to
Dredging & Marine Consultants, LLC (DMC). These services will specifically include:
Project Management and Coordination with St. Lucie County Engineering Dept. and with
DMC to complete the scope of work within scheduled time period.
Collect geotechnical infonnation at Upland Material Management Area as follows:
SPT Borings (estimated 8 borings @ 20 ft)
Drilling Supervision and Logging of Boreholes
Hand Auger Borings in Borrow Areas
Laboratory Testing (Moisture Content, Grain
Size Analysis, Atterberg Limits)
Engineering Coordination and Inspection
Prepare design drawings, plans, and specifications for construction of Temporary Upland
Material Management Area (TUMMA) in order to provide sufficient volume for
placement of Phase I dredged material.
VI. Period of Service
BCI will provide the services for the above scope upon receiving a notice to proceed. The
project will be completed within 30 days after receiving notice to proceed.
'-
...."
Exhibit B
ST. LUCIE COUNTY - CONTINUING ENGINEERING SERVICES (TAYLOR CREEK RESTORATION DREDGING)
BCI LABOR COST AND EXPENSES
Project Name:
Taylor Creek Phase I Restoration Dredging
St. Lucie County Project Manager:
BCI Project Number:
Date:
Don West, P.E.
G1910801.3
14-Nov-03
Sheet 1 of 1
:::çQsT~srJ1'll:AT-'=>' .
" ,
TASK
ACTIVITY
LUMP SUM
COST
BY TASK
Total Work Order Cost
1 Project Meetings & Contract Management
2 Geotechnical Field Investigation and Laboratory Testing
less Amount Invoiced 12/23/03
Net Amount Task 2
3 Volume Calculations
4 Design of TUMMA Dikes and Reservoir
5 Preparation of Construction Plans and Specifications
6 Responses to Agency Reviews of Plans
TOTAL LUMP SUM COST
7493
"-
·
ø
=
..
c
'¡;'
!
a
rn c
0
W ~
tJ
:> ~ w
0:: 0::
W ~ 0:
·
rn · ¡¡
(j
C) 0 ;;:
Z ~ c
0
¡¡: I- a
W
W
Z
Õ
z
w
C)
z
5
"'z
0-
;:;!z Z
~on
"-U~ .
~. :L ..
.= >- ii .
c
c.~::> :Ë
~~~ ~
¡¡¡83 l~
a¡ w J ~e
! co
a¡ - X oz
...tJ:> i)¡
'-:J " z
~~3 ~ ~ë'
,3D..
Jjtñ~ '0 ..,Õ~
~ "..a
..
õ
" m ~ m m " ., .,
N 0 ., 0 0 .,
m m 0 m ~ .. "
:;/,1- .. ti ;; ;; N .. ~ ~
1-13 ..
~o
0 ., 0 0 0 0 ., "
.,
" .. ~ .. .. 0 .. ~ "
"
'" .. ..
"
üf¡
....
><
'"
I- 0 ., 0 0 0 0 ., "
"
0 .. " .. .. .. .. " "
"'" " N "
~~ ~ :;!
z'"
g~
..",
::>
"
" * ~ m " ~ "
N ., 0 m ~ ~
m 0 m .. 0' "
"'I- .. N ;; ;; N :::
~13 .. ..
:50
~;2 m N 0 ..
"8 ~ '" N :: ;;; ~ 0
:5"
~~ 0 !
'C. 0 N 0 0 .. - 0 "
ë3ã "N
..
~
!;;~ m ..
:!g 0 :! 0 0 0 0 ..0 :t 0
-" "
",.. .. ..
5
'"
~~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 m- ~
~g: ~~' ~
:I.. ..
"
~
~a '"
~ ~~ m å
0 0 ., ~ :! 0 "m ::;
:If ~; N..-
... ..."", ..
0"
...
~: ., ~
N
.... 0 N ., m m - "'N ¡:¡
~~ NN' :;!
..
"0 .. :
:f~ 0
N - .. .. .. N "0 :::
"- ~~' ~
..;;; ..
;3 '" '"
g¡s; '" - N N '" ~ ~S ::! ..
'C_ .. ~
....
..
c ·
~ c ~
0
~ ~ tt
1J
~ 1 "
c
c e ·
i " ·
.~ " c
!! ¡: " c ·
c : · ~ z
i :; . · 0
c c
¡:: ~ 0 0:: · E ¡::
0 " ¡¡: ;;
;a " ~ . 0 c
.. . 0 '~ 0 Z
0- j : .. 0
:g i 0:: o. ¡::
u · '" '" ~ ~
Q " 0
.. " c c
0 ~ ·
. õ · u .. " ..
f ¡¡: ; ; " 0- o.
'5 0 1J .. ~
0 ~ ~ c I III
; ; 'e 0 0 '" "
~ i · c ::> 0-
§ 0 ..
ë Ii ~ i " I-
<'J õ z "
.. > " .. 0:: " 0
:E 0
" ~ ~
" - N '" .. " ..
;! ~ 0
I-
..
Qj
Q
J:
rn
...."
',.
"".. .. 5
-" " "
"" " '"
~ ~"'ri ; :;i
0
-
z
0
¡::
0
CI) ::>
Z 8 !:.
0 Œt '"
ëD "'.. ~
Z "'.¡¡
Š 131-
:J= "
~::: .
.I!
Ii; ~:J ~ j
Olll~ ~
0 ~ ~~n 0
u o . 0 0
j%~ . 0-
~ Q
'" . z
> 0
- - ~ ! ô!
00 0
...." "
~
"""
L.L!(\')
a.. .
~
-0
(f)CX)
0.>0
s~
I
cO>
o~
0<.9
-
()
CI)
'õ'
...
Il.
C) t:
c: CI)
C) C)
"C co
CI) c:
... co
C ~
c: _
o ()
;; CI)
CO '-'0"
... ......
o Il. CI)
CO') - .c
~Z'~~Z'E
"'I:t c: 1.1. "C c: j
:!:j':'::CI)jZ
-OCl)~O_
- () CI) () () ()
() "C CI) ,"':, UJ CI) .~
CI) .- - _ .- 0
:!:: ... () ... () () ...
:8 [..Jj .2 CI) ..Jj Il.
~ ~ '0-' -
>< e...: CO ... ...: ()
WIl.UJI-Il.UJEn
C'?
o
o
N
lJ - - ~tjtj~~~
~ ~~~~~
~~ - - ~~~~~
- -
- -
- -
~ ~
~
~- I-- ..........
ns - I-- :::::::::: ::::::-
"")- I-- ;::::::::: -
~~ II =
110
II
~~
1:) ~~~==
0
c.- =~~~~~~
0>-
tn_
I
C) - - ~~~~~~
:s - -
c( - -
:s ~~~~~~
"")
=
en
e
.Q
êií
OJ u
e ¡¡::
1::: T;
( ) ( )
c: .J::: a.
0 êií .!::: (f)
en
;; C> a -0 e
C. e 2: e rn
rn
.¡: ,Q ( ) ã:
u en en
êií ( ) e '+-
In E a: rn a
0> ã: en
C L- -0 ~
a e
'+- e ( )
.\I:: E: rn a .;:;
In en ~
ns ( ) ( ) ( )
I- :õ ~ :::I a:
L-
rn en 0 ¡¡¡ »
e u
ïij .Q <t: e e
~ a ( )
]j 2 Ü OJ
ci :::I 2 '+- <t:
(ij u :J a B
:::I
ãi u (ij l- e
ï: ü '+- a ( )
(f) .J::: a ~ en
Ü » u ( ) e
E e L- a
( ) ( ) OJ rn
( ) 2: Õ :::I ,- a. a.
'õ' en ( ) en
L- :::I ( ) ë5 ( ) L- ( )
0.. (f) C> > o 0.. a:
DI I I
-.:t
o
o
N
...."
(])
c:::
ã)
E
¡::
Ü
m
V)
(])
-
C'O
.~
"C
c:::
~¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡
"'
~
t
~
'....I
ITEM NO. 4b
DATE: February 17, 2004
AGENDA REQUEST
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING []
CONSENT [X]
TO:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY: ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION (4110)
SUBJECT:
Establishing Multi Way Stops on Easy Street and on Palm Drive in Indian River Estates.
BACKGROUND:
At the December 2, 2003 County Commission Meeting, the Board directed staff to install multi way stops on
Bartow Street in Indian River Estates and to present a plan to the Indian River Estates Homeowners Association
on altemative placement of stop sign in Indian River Estates. Staff attended the meeting of the Indian River
Estates Homeowners Association on January 28, 2004 to present Staffs alternative and the option of keeping
and/or modifying the existing pattem of Stop Sign within Indian River Estates. It was the majority decision of the
residents present to keep the existing Stop signs in place and add multi way stops at the intersections of Sunset
Blvd., and Scott Street, Sunset Blvd. and Bradley Street and at the intersections of Easy Street with Buchanan
Drive, Myrtle Drive, and Tangelo Drive.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
RECOMMENDATION:
BCC Approval of Stop Signs on Bartow, Dec. 2, 2003 Agenda Item #7
Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution Numbers 04-59 and 04-60 establishing multi way stops at
the intersections of Sunset Blvd., and Scott Street, Sunset Blvd. and Bradley Street and at the intersections of
Easy Street with Buchanan Drive, Myrtle Drive, and Tangelo Drive.
COMMISSION ACTION:
1tI APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER Approved 5-0
Dou sAnderson
County Administrator
[ x] County Attorney
[ ] County Engineer
[ ] Purchasing Dept
y
Coordination/Signatures
[, [p"., w",," D;,. ~
[ ] Com Dev Director
] Mgt & Budget
] Project, Mgr.
] Other
MultiwayStpsEasy&PalmDr
,
\..;
.....,
J
RESOLUTION NO. 04-59
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING MULTI-WAY
STOPS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF
SUNSET BOULEVARD AND SCOTT STREET,
SUNSET BOULEVARD AND BRADLEY STREET
IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made
the following determinations,
1. Section 316.008 (1) (a), Florida Statutes, authorizes the Board to designate any
intersection under its jurisdiction as a stop intersection.
2. The intersections of Sunset Boulevard and Scott Street, Sunset Boulevard and
Bradley Street are under St. Lucie County's Jurisdiction.
3. Due to the increase in Traffic at these intersections, the Board of County
Commissioners of St. Lucie County has determined that multi-way stops be designated at the
intersections of Sunset Boulevard and Scott Street, Sunset Boulevard and Bradley Street.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County of St. Lucie County
Commissioners of St. Lucie County:
1. The intersections of Sunset Boulevard and Scott Street, Sunset Boulevard and
Bradley Street are hereby designated as a multi-way stop.
2. The St. Lucie County Road and Bridge Manager is hereby directed to erect stop
signs at the intersections of Sunset Boulevard and Scott Street, Sunset Boulevard and Bradley Street.
3. The County Administrator is hereby directed to provide copies of this resolution to the
Sheriff of St. Lucie County, and the St. Lucie County Road and Bridge Manager.
'#
\.;
'...I
J
After a motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows:
Chair Paula Lewis
Vice Chairman John D. Bruhn
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson
Commissioner Doug Coward
Commissioner Cliff Barnes
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 17th day of February, 2004.
ATTEST:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
DEPUTY CLERK
CHAIRMAN
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
COUNTY ATTORNEY
ResQ4'{)59 MultiWyStops-PalmDr.doc
..¡
\..f
...,
J
RESOLUTION NO. 04-60
A RESOLUTION DESIGNATING MULTI-WAY
STOPS AT THE INTERSECTIONS OF
EASY STREET WITH BUCHANAN DRIVE,
MYRTLE DRIVE AND TANGELO DRIVE
IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made
the following determinations,
1. Section 316.008 (1) (a), Florida Statutes, authorizes the Board to designate any
intersection under its jurisdiction as a stop intersection.
2. The intersections of Easy Street with Buchanan Drive, Myrtle Drive, and Tangelo
Drive are under St. Lucie County's Jurisdiction.
3. Due to the increase in Traffic at these intersections, the Board of County
Commissioners of St. Lucie County has determined that multi-way stops be designated at the
intersections of Easy Street with Buchanan Drive, Myrtle Drive, and Tangelo Drive.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County of St. Lucie County
Commissioners of St. Lucie County:
1. The intersections of Easy Street with Buchanan Drive, Myrtle Drive, and
Tangelo Drive are hereby designated as a multi-way stop.
2. The St. Lucie County Road and Bridge Manager is hereby directed to erect stop
signs at the intersections of Easy Street with Buchanan Drive, Myrtle Drive, and Tangelo Drive.
3. The County Administrator is hereby directed to provide copies of this resolution to the
Sheriff of St. Lucie County, and the St. Lucie County Road and Bridge Manager.
"
)
..
"-'
...."
After a motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows:
Chair Paula Lewis
Vice Chairman John D. Bruhn
Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson
Commissioner Doug Coward
Commissioner Cliff Barnes
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 17th day of February, 2004.
ATTEST:
DEPUTY CLERK
Res04-60 MultiWy Stops-Easy Stdoc
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
BY:
CHAIRMAN
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND
CORRECTNESS:
COUNTY ATTORNEY
From: 'Casey" <CASEY@harborfederaLcom>
To: ~ersond@co.st-luCie.fLus>. <barbarab@co.st-lucle.fI.us>,
<barnesc@co.st-lucie.fI.us>, <cowardd@co.st-lucie.fI.us>, <liz@co.st-lucle.fI.us>,
<pentzj@co.st-lucie.fI.us>, <sherring@co.st-lucie.fI.us>
Date: 2/17/20042:55:22 PM
Subject: Indian River Estates Stop Signs
Dear Commissioners, Mr. Anderson, and Mr. Herring,
Please allow me to begin this e-mail by apologizing for not being able
to come before you in person. My wife and I have a 4 week old baby at
home, and three other children. Right now the older three are all sick,
so we are forced to "divide and conquer" due to the illnesses. I take
the older three, and my wife takes the baby so that we don't get the
baby sick. Therefore, I cannot come to the commission meeting tonight.
Back in December you all approved the installation of stop signs along
Bartow street in Indian River Estates. We were having horrible problems
with speeders due to the fact that there were no stop signs on the
entire road. After the installation of the stop signs, we saw an
immediate improvement, which has continued today. We used to see on a
daily basis one or two cars speeding at over 60-70 mph. Since the stop
signs we have yet to see one instance comparable to those speeds. This
has been a phenomenal improvement.
As I stated in my thank you e-mail back in January, we now see
neighbors walking their dogs, and others enjoying a walk or a jog to
stay fit. Prior to the stop signs we all knew to stay off that street,
it was too dangerous.
One of the requirements of installing the stop signs was for Mr. Scott
Herring to perform a traffic study, and make recommendations for stop
sign placement. Mr. Herring met with our Homeowner's Association the
end of January and presented his plan. Since the plan involved the
removal of some of the stop signs on the long North and South blocks,
the residents felt that this would only make the speeding worse. In
fact, several of those in attendance have requested additional stop
signs.
As a first-hand observer, I can tell you the stop signs were the right
choice for Bartow Street. There is no single traffic device that will
slow every speeder down. But a stop sign is an effective and
inexpensive traffic device that DOES slow down traffic at that point.
This was an example of good government at work. My neighbors and I
thank you very much.
Bill Casey
5901 Silver Oak Drive
Fort Pierce, FL 34982
(772) 466-3304 Home
(772) 201-3473 Cell
Bill Casey,
x1058
(772) 460-7025
...."
c. - It-- ß
l'
~
'wi
ITEM NO. C - 4C
DATE: February 17,2004
AGENDA REQUEST
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [X]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115
Michael Powley, P.E.
County Engineer
SUBJECT: Request for a Public Hearing on St. Lucie Citrus Mining Permit Application.
BACKGROUND: The proposed St Lucie Citrus Mine is located in south central St. Lucie County south of
Okeechobee Road along east side of Ideal Holding Road. There has not been any previous mining activity on
this site.
FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A.
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval for a public hearing to be held on March 16,2004 or
soon thereafter to consider the request of the St. Lucie Citrus Mining Permit Application.
COMMISSION ACTION:
[ ] APPROVED
MOTHER:
[ ] DENIED
---
Pulled prior to
meeting.
Douglas Anderson
County Administrator
¡,]C,"OIy Attorn" ,.2r~
[x]Originating Dept. pu~orks
[x]Eng/MSBU Coor.
Coordination/Sianatures
~
[x]Com,Dev,'" ~
[]BudgeURe~C ord,
[]Mgt. & BUdget~B
[x]Env, Res. DiV~
..
nge Ave
"
U
œ
œ
.,
N VJ
VU
N
I
Ü
- 2 3
"
It:
U
....",.
'-'
-....I
ITEM NO. C- 4D
DATE: February 17,2004
AGENDA REQUEST
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [x]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY:
MirMeL:~,
Michael V. Powley, P. .
County Engineer
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): ENGINEERING DIVISION (4115)
SUBJECT:
To commit to cost share with the Florida Department of Transportation in the completion of the Indian River Lagoon Trace
shared-use pathway and forward the attached letter. Attached is correspondence discussing the proposed arrangement.
BACKGROUND:
The Indian River Lagoon Trace pathway project is located on South Hutchinson Island from approximately the south
county line to the Fort Pierce city limits along the east side of SR A-I-A. The project was broken up into three phases.
Phase I is located south of the Florida Power and Light power plant and approximately three and a half (3.5) miles in
length. Phase I is in the process of being completed. Phase II is located north of the FP&L power plant and is
approximately seven miles in length. Phase III is located inside the FP&L power plant property and is approximately one
mile in length.
The design for Phase I was completed by Glatting Jackson. Phase I was broken up into three sub-sections because of the
availability offunding. The construction of the first two sub-sections has been completed with the third sub-section
anticipated to start construction later this year. The FDOT has agreed to assist with some funding for the third sub-section
of Phase I. The design for Phase II was begun by Glatting Jackson early in the year 2000, with subsequently little progress
due to the mitigation requirements for the environmental impacts. At this time there is no consultant on contract for design
of construction plans for Phase III.
The FDOT is currently designing a resurfacing project of SR A-I-A from the FP&L power plant north to the Fort Pierce
city limits. At staffs request the FDOT has included a pathway across the FP&L property, which includes crossings at
both FP&L's intake and discharge canal at no cost to the County. These limits correspond to the County's Phase III. Staff
made a request ofFDOT to incorporate the County's Phase II, ITom the north side of the FP&L power plant to the Fort
Pierce City Limits, pathway with their resurfacing project. The FDOT agreed to incorporate the pathway into their plans
and construct it, if the County would agree to pay $1,750,000 for wetland impact mitigation and $691,323.82 for incidental
work that would be necessary to accommodate the pathway.
The mitigation cost would have to be paid even if the County constructed the pathway without FDOT help. If the County
were to construct the pathway the total cost would be approximately $3 to $4 million not including mitigation. If the
FDOT constructs the pathway with their resurfacing project, they will be responsible for all permitting and inspection.
After the FDOT project is completed, the County must still return and construct the recreational enhancements at the
County parks.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: :51.3CCO
Funds in the amount of$2.5 million dollars will be made available the fiscal year 2005 in Fund No.1 0 I 006-4116-5-63'665-4904
Transportation Trust/Impact Fees. Funds to come from road impact fees and/or alternative funding
sources.
I
'-'
...."
February 18, 2004
Gerry O'Reilly, P.E.
Department of Transportation, District Four
3400 West Commercial Blvd.
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
RE: Indian River Lagoon Trace Shared-Use Path
SR AlA (Walton Rocks Park to Fort Pierce City Limits)
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
I am in receipt of your letter dated January 29,2004. You have requested a commitment from
the County to cost share with the Florida Department of Transportation. Your assistance in
helping the County in completing the pathway on SR AlA from Walton Rocks Park to the Fort
Pierce City Limits is greatly appreciated.
As I understand, the FDOT needs a written response to your letter by March 2, 2004. Please let
this letter serve as a commitment on the County's part for $1,750,000 for mitigation and
$691,323.82 for incidental work necessary to accommodate the pathway. You have indicated
that the FDOT will be responsible for implementation of the construction and inspection of the
pathway.
Thank you for your assistance in this project. Your assistance in helping provide a shared-use
pathway to the citizens is greatly appreciated. If you have any questions, please call me at (772)
462-1406.
Sincerely,
Paula Lewis
County Commissioner District 3
Board of County Commission Chairperson
cc:
HOCC
Daniel Mcintyre - County Attorney
Douglas Anderson - County Administrator
Ray Wazny - Assistant County Administrator
Don West, P,E. - Public Works Director
Michael Powley, P.E. - County Engineer
Michael Harvey, E,I, - Engineer Intern
Jose Santiago, P.E. - FDOT Project Manager
~
~
.....,
JEB BUSH
GOVERNOR
Florida Department of Transþortation
DIRECTOR of PLANNING and PRODUCTION
3400 West Commercial Boulevard. Fort Lauderdale. Florida 33309-342 I
Telephone: (954) 777-441 I Fax (954) 777-4197
Internet Email: gerry,oreilly@dotstate.fLus
Toll Free: 1-866-336-8435
JOSÉ ABREU
SECRETARY
January 29, 2004
œ Œ@ŒOWŒ ill
FEB - 3 31M
ENGINEERING
Mr. Michael Harvey, E.I.
St. Lucie County Engineering Division
2300 Virginia A venue
2nd Floor Annex, Room 229
Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5652
Dear Mr. Harvey:
SUBJECT: Request for Time to Designate and Secure Funding (Indian River Lagoon Trace- SR AlA)
This is in response to your letter dated January 7, 2004, requesting an additional 30 days in order to
review your budget and designate a funding source.
The Department will grant your office 30 more days to designate and secure funding for the sidewalk.
Consequently, our project schedule will also be delayed by 30 days. The new production complete date
will be September 20, 2004, and the new letting date will be March 30, 2005.
In order to ensure that the current resurfacing project remains on schedule, and that we can add the
features you have requested, the Department needs to have a response and a commitment from St. Lucie
County by March 2,2004. Ifwe do not receive a response by that date, the Department will proceed
with the project as originally scheduled and will not be able to entertain any other requests for project
modifications.
Thank you for your interest in this project. If you need more information, please contact, Mr. Jose
Santiago, P.E., Project Manager at 954-777-4406.
Sincerely,
l::::¡y,~' ~'
Director of Planning and Production
District Four
GO: jsm
cc: Mr. Don West, P.E., Public Works Director
Mr. Michael V. Powley, P.E., St. Lucie County Engineering Division
Ms. Maria Fonnoso, P.E., Capital Projects Engineer
LL: 04-002
www.dot.state.fl.us
\!) RECYCLED PAPER
'-'
....,¡
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
January 7, 2004
Gerry O'Reilly, P.E.
Department of Transportation, District Four
3400 West Commercial Blvd.
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
RE: Indian River Lagoon Trace Shared-Use Path
SR AlA
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
I am in receipt of your letter dated December 17, 2003. Your assistance in helping the County in
completing the sidewalk on SR AlA is greatly appreciated. As you are aware the Board of
County Commissioners has to approve the spending of any money. I would like to request an
additional thirty days from the January 31, 2004 deadline to review the budget and designate the
funding source. After the funding source has been designated, there will be meetings scheduled
with Board members followed by a formal Board presentation for approval. A timeline for the
County to have the funds for payment will be needed for the Board presentation. Any help in
providing this timeline will be greatly appreciated.
If you have any questions, please call me at (772) 462-1717.
,SinCerelY, J ~~
~~/P7~"
Michael Harvey, E.!.
Engineer Intern
cc: Don West, P.E. - Public Works Director
Michael Powley, P,E, - County Engineer
Maria Formoso, P.E. - Capital Projects Engineer
Jose Santiago, P,E. - FOOT Project Manager
JOHN D. DRUHN, Disrrict No, 1 . DOUG COWARD, Disrricr No, 2 . PAULA A LEWIS, District No, J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No, 4 . CLIFF CARNES, District No.5
Counry Administrator - Douglas M, Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue · Ft. Pierce, FL 34982
Public Worl~s: (772) 462-1485 · FAX (772) 462-2362
Division of Engineering: (772) 462-1707 Fax 462-2362 · Division of Road & ßridge: (772) 462-2511 FAX 462-2363
Division of Solid Waste: (772) 462-1768 FAX 462-6987
Division of ßuilding & Inspections: (772) 462-1553 Fax 462-1735 · TDD (772) 462-1428
www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us
'-'
~
"-II
JEB BUSH
GOVERNOR
Florida Department of Transportation
DIRECTOR of PLANNING and PRODUCTION
3400 West Commercial Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33309-3421
Telephone: (954) 777-4411 Fax (954) 777-4197
Internet Emai1: gerrv,oreilly@dot.stateJLus
Toll Free: 1-866-336-8435
JOSÉ ABREU
SECRETARY
fõJŒ@ŒDWŒfñ)
tJIJ DEC 2 2 2003 ~
December 17, 2003
Me Michael Harvey, E.I.
St.Lucie County Engineering Division
2300 Virginia Avenue
2nd Floor Annex, Room 229
Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5252
.--
ENGINEERrNG
Dear Me Harvey:
SUBJECT: Indian River Lagoon Trace Shared-Use Path
The Department has received your letter of December 8, 2003 and has evaluated your inquiry on the
incremental costs identified in our spreadsheet of December 1, 2003.
We have asked our consultant HNTB to revise the spreadsheet to show no costs for the work to be done at
the Intake and Discharge Canal bridges. These costs will be incurred by the Department.
The new costs reflect a reduction from $906,373.82 to $691,323.82. The revised spread sheet with the
new amount was e-mailed to your office on December 16, 2003 for your use in your meeting of
December 19, 2003. Attached is a copy of the revised spread sheet.
It is our understanding that this will clarify your concerns of the incremental costs shown on the previous
spreadsheet.
If you have any further questions please call Me Jose Santiago, P.E., Project Manager at 954-777-4406.
Sincerely
/l6r#Jvrl(¡dt~
Gerry 6'Reilly, P.E.
Director of Production and Planning
District Four
cc: Mr. Donald West, St. Lucie Public Works Director
Mr. Michael Powley, St.Lucie County Engineer
The Honorable Frannie Hutchison
LL: #03-320
www.dot.state.fl.us
@ RECYCLED PAPER
·"""
..""
'0 '0 '0
c c c
co co co M
CD CD CD 0
ë ë 0) 0) 0) 0
'0 '0 '0
CD CD 'C 'C 'C ~
c E E a¡ a¡ a¡ CO
.2 ~ ~ 0) 0) 0) ..-
ë c .5 c --
~ C>~ ~6 :;; iií ~ N
«0 Ox 'x 'x ..-
.s::.o SO CD CD CD
C =u.. 'i u. 0) 0) 0)
.~ .>< ~'O CD '0 .5 c c
0 ãi B c o c '0 '6 '6
In ~ C (1 C (1 I!! I!! I!!
c In CD co~ ~~æ
1~ In '0 'E c æ æ
In ëi5
0 e 88 55::> ::> ::>
In u '0 8u ... ... ...
CD ,g ,g ,g
In In co CD co CD
e ë 0 .s: ïJ .5 "õ iií iií iií
u a. '0 ::) '0 ::) 8 8 8.><
... ë e CD..J CD..J c:~ c:~
,g 0 a. > . > . c-
UI u 5 oii5 0- ,g~,g~ o co
!!l EI/) :::> ~
~ ãi B u. E c CD c o CD 0 CD o CD
E ~ "5 C> CD CD a:: $ 2:2 2:2 2:g
a:: CD ûj (I) en CI) iií In
:J '0 CT ª E.! E.!
(1 In C ~ C ~ C ~
CD 0 "¡¡; CD CD CD CD o CD 0 CD 0 CD
~ J: ~ a:: -a¡ -a¡ UcUc U c
U
CI) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II) ,... N
(J 0 0 L() 0 0 0 0 0 0 "": <0 110
ex:) ci ... ..;
... ex:) I() ci ci ci ci ci ... N
CI) L() a> ,... 0 0 0 0 0 II) ,... N
0 0 N <0 0 L() 0 0 0 ....0 ... "t
õ: cD Ò ex>
Ñ ItÏ ~ ,..: ItÏ IÓ ItÏ .... Ò ....
L() <0 Z; CX) C') ;¡ ;¡ Z; 0 a> en
...: Z; N ~ <oIt <oIt (Q <oIt (Q
<oIt tit tI't
I.L. ,...
CI) 0 W
I ~
.c N
- (")
I M
0 ..... :E
I a>
- COco ¡::
ñi a> co 0 0 0
NM tJ) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
e 00. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci c::i ci
(") W 0 0 I() I() ex:) I() 0 0 0
CU ... ,..: I() 0 0 0
U N Q) .- <oIt <oIt <0 L() N ... ItÏ IÓ ItÏ
. .c ~ <oIt <oIt ~
o E tJ) ... ... ...
CI)
~ Z ::I 0
CU õZ U
- m-
e '(5' ~ >
- à:"õ'£t:
e ro à:<C 0 0 0 0
CU Z 0 0 0 0 0
õ: 1) -i ex:) ~ 0 ci ci 0 0 0
c IX) :E a> ... M I() 0 0 c 0 C! C! C!
(II l- N 0 """ CX) 0 L() w w
... .£ Z ::i Ñ Ñ N M Ñ > >
CI) LL N L() 0 0
~ J: W ~ ~
I- w w
0 0 £t: a:: a::
D.. 0 D.. ~ ~
CI) LL W W
.c > > >: u: u: u: !:: !:: « « «
-
E 0 0 U ..,j ..,j ..,j ui u.i ui
0
...
I.L.
£t: '0
C
M íñ ('I
« c J!I
.~ c
..... !!l C) GI
« c E
ãi (I) :É GI
a::: ~ In ëii >
'0 e a:: e ãi
tJ) c c
W U Q) CI. ('I >-
CD '0 Õ .5 ãi U .>< u
ë c ~ c CD C
CD ~ ('I CD .>< GI
ë 0 x ~ U e> CD ~ 0)
of! ~ ..J C
CD C C ~ C CD co U .>< 15 :¡::
0 ~:!!: .s::. U CD
E 0 U (1 o~ .>< 0 '0 ~ C
.>< ~ n. .t: co co In '0 ::) 0 0
c ~ ¡;¡ GI ~ :Ë is ::) ~ U U
co > In 'E ~ ~
n ~ In U Q) .g'GI CD '0 IX! :.e
'0 (1 ..J ..J .5
E co ëo CD ::) .- '0 n. n. 0) E ::> 0
)( Ü ... .- m :J ã5 II)
w w ... n. (!) IX!U) u. u. U) ....
M
Ci'
cø
....
I
N
C') ....
C') ~
...
N N CI)
c¡.¡ M ... U)
,... N , 'S;
<0 ... ¿; ... ;b
0 0 0 .b CI)
N N 0 C') ~ C') 0::
... ... """ """ L()
'-'
...,¡
BOARD OF COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
PUBLIC WORKS
DEPARTMENT
December 8, 2003
Gerry O'Reilly, P.E.
Department of Transportation, District Four
3400 West Commercial Blvd.
Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309
RE: Indian River Lagoon Trace Shared-Use Path
SR AlA
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
I am in receipt of your letter dated December 2,2003. Your assistance in helping the County in
completing the sidewalk on SR A 1 A is greatly appreciated. I am in the process of setting up a
meeting with the Public Works Director and the County Engineer to discuss your offer. It is my
expectation that staff will recommend approval to our Board. At this time it does appear to be
favorable that the County will accept your terms. However, I need a clarification on the
incremental costs. Under a previous agreement, it was agreed upon that the FDOT would
construct everything between Walton Rocks Beach and the Turtle Beach Nature Trail at no cost
to the County. This included the two FPL canal crossings. Your help in clearing this up is
appreciated. It would be most beneficial if I could have an up-dated spreadsheet prior to my
meeting on December 19,2003.
If you have any questions, please call me at (772) 462-1717.
?~;/~
Michael Harvey, E.~
Engineer Intern
cc:
BOCC
Don West, P.E. - Public Works Director
Michael Powley, P.E. - County Engineer
Maria Formoso, P.E. - Capital Projects Engineer
Scott Herring, P.E. - Road & Bridge Manager
Jose Santiago, P.E. - FOOT Project Manger
Lois Bush - FOOT MPO Coordinator
Marcin Gadek - FOOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator
JOHN D. BRUHN, DisTrict No, 1 . DOUG COWARD, Disrrict No, 2 . PAULA A. LEWIS, District No,.3 . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District NO.4· CLIFF ßARNES, District NO.5
County Administrotor - Douglas M, Anderson
2JOO Virginia Avenue · Ft. Pierce, FL J4982
Public Worl'\s: (772) 462-1485 · FAX (772) 462-2J62
Division of Engineering: (772) 462-1707 Fox 462-2362 · Division of Rood & Oridge: (772) 462-2511 FAX 462-2363
Division of Solid Waste: (772) 462-1768 FAX 462-6987
Division of Ouilding & Inspections: (772) 462-1553 Fax 462-1735 · TOD (772) 462-1428
www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us
'-"
~
.....,
Florida Department of Transportation
JEB BUSH
GOVERNOR
DIRECTOR OF PLANNING and PRODUCTION
3400 West Commercial Boulevard, Fort Lauderda]e, Florida 33309-3421
Telephone: (954) 777-44] I Fax: (954) 777-4197
Internet Email: gerrv.oreilly(a)dot.state.llus
Toll Free: 1-866-336-8435
JOSE ABREU
SECRETARY
December 2, 2003
fõJŒ@Œßwœfñ)
lJ1) DEC - 8 2003 ~
Mr. Michael Harvey, E.!.
St. Lucie County Engineering Division
2300 Virginia Avenue
2nd Floor Annex, Room 229
Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5652
ENGINEERING
Dear Mr. Harvey:
Subject:
Request for design, permitting and construction of eight foot sidewalk along
SR AlA (Indian River Lagoon Trace)
Thank you for your e-mai] dated October 10, 2003, requesting the incorporation of an eight foot
sidewalk in our upcoming resurfacing project in St. Lucie County along SR AlA.
At our last meeting, the Department presented a technical memorandum explaining that an eight
foot sidewalk would be included in our project for approximately two miles from the Walton
Rock Beach entrance to the entrance of the Turtle Beach Nature Trail. The justification for only
providing two miles is that impacts to wetlands, the project schedule, and the project cost would
be minimized.
In considering your request for the inclusion of five additional miles of sidewalk, the Department
has made the following decision:
The Department will design and construct the sidewalk at no cost to St. Lucie County and
included it in our resurfacing project it;
· St. Lucie County will pay for the incremental cost of the work (earthwork, guardrail,
railing) necessary to accommodate the sidewalk. This work is required in order to satisfy
the drainage requirements set forth by the South Florida Water Management District
(SFWMD) and meet design criteria as dictated by Chapter 25 (RRR Criteria) in the
Department's Plans Preparation Manual. The anticipated incremental cost will be
$906,374.
· St. Lucie County will provide all mitigation required for the sidewalk by paying for
available credits through the Bear Point Sanctuary in St. Lucie County. The anticipated
cost of the wetland impact mitigation is $1,750,000, including design fees.
. St. Lucie County will enter into a Joint Participation Agreement and provide the funding
($906,374) required for the incremental cost.
wwwdot,stat8.fLus
@ RECYCLED PAPER
"'"
...."
Mr. Michael Harvey, E.I
December 2, 2003
Page 2
In order to ensure that the current resurfacing project remains on schedule, the Department
would like to have a response from S1. Lucie County by January 31,2004- If you have any
questions, please feel free to contact Mr. Jose Santiago, P.E., Project Manager at 954-777-4406.
Sincerely,
ß'í o'~Qt
G;J; O'Reilly, P.E. )
Director of Planning an Production
District Four
GO:js
cc: The Honorable Frannie Hutchinson, Commissioner, S1. Lucie County
Michael V. Powley, P.E., S1. Lucie County Engineering Division
J. Scott Herring, P.E., S1. Lucie County Public Works Department
Karen Butcher, S1. Lucie County BicyclelPedestrian Coordinator
Dennis Murphy, S1. Lucie County Community Development
Lois Bush, FDOT MPO Coordinator
Marcin Gadek, FDOT BicyclelPedestrian Coordinator
,~
en
~
E
:J
>-
~
o
Q)
CJ
...
Q)
ä:
...
LL...
o W
~ N ....
-'? «
0'7~:E
-~¡gt=
ca N C") ,1\
t: 0 v,
ca~(¡jW
00.0....
Q)ZEC/)
~ :J 0
cat3z0
-0)....
.E'O'~>
_Q::'O'O::
t: L..«
caroa.
_'13 Z
o..æ~:E
;,~ z-
~u.Iu1
Of- IV
0..8 ä:
Q)u.
J:
-
E
o
...
LL
0::
M
«
"I'""
«
0::
en
~
..."
't) 't) 't) 't) 't)
e e e e e
'" '" '" '" '"
Q) Q) Q) Q) Q)
en en en en en
't) 't) 't) 't) 't)
e ð5 ð5 ðš ~ Æ
,2 en en en en en
ë ,5 e .5 e .5
Q) (¡j ~ (¡j ~ (¡j
x ';C¡ ';C¡ ';C¡ ';C¡ ';C¡
UJ Q) Q) Q) Q) Q)
t e en en en en en
.~ .>£ e e e e e
·1 0 ro 'ë 'ë 'ë 'ë 'ë
<f) 3: '" ~ ~ '" '"
e <f) cD C, C, c,
g ,;; <f) 't) en en
ð <f) U5 c. c. c. c. c.
(,) e ::> ::> ::> ::> ::>
ü 't) '- .E '- '- '-
<f) cD .E .E .E .E
<f) , <f)
0 ë 0 (¡j (¡j (¡j (¡j (¡j
U c. 0 0 0 0 0
'- ë 0 u u u.>£ u u
a. .>£ .>£ .>£ e~
.E 0 e ro e ro e - e ro
ü 0 0 0 o '" ,2 o '"
!!1 B ~ 3: Ü 3: +:: 3: Ü 3: +:: 3:
ro ~ Q) cD U Q) cD U Q)
3: '5 en 2 't) 2 't) 2:2 2 't) 2~
't) C" ,E (¡j .¡¡¡ (¡j '¡¡¡ (¡j <f) (¡j .¡¡¡ (¡j <f)
'" <f) e 3: e 3: e 3: e 3: e 3:
Q) 0 ,;; 0 Q) 0 cD 0 Q) 0 Q) 0 cD
:r: ::E 0:: Ü e Û e Ü e Ü e Ü e
::!..:...
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I() r-- N
0 Ç) L() 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ç) .... (Q co
- 8 cò 0 .... LtÍ c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i .... N M
cò 0 0
! ~ L() OJ r-- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I() N r-.
0 0 N (Q 0 L() 0 0 0 0 0. .... N M
c.ô Ò 0:>. lÔ .¡ ,...- lÔ Ñ lÔ lÔ L() cD a5 <Ii
L() (Q N .... 0:> '" 0 0:> .... .... .... co .... 0
.... N <It <It <It <It ¡;; <It ffl <It <It r-. ¡;; 0)
<It <It ~ ~
.
.
0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0
.. GI 0 0 0 0 0 0 c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i
'2 (,) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LtÍ LtÍ cò LtÍ 0 0 0 0
:;) .¡: r--: LtÍ 0 0. 0 0 0
a. <It <It (Q L() N .... lÔ LtÍ lÔ lÔ
<It ffl <It <It 0 N
.... 0:> .... .... ....
I b 0 0 0 0
0 0 .... 0 0 Ç)
¡ -<i cò 0 0 0 0 0 0
L() LtÍ c:i 0 Ç) Ç) Ç) Ç) Ç)
E ca OJ .... co? 0 0
! :::I N o. '<t 0:> 0 L() .... .... .... .... ....
a Ñ N N M Ñ
N L()
:~ ~ ~ ~ u.: u.: u.: <i <i <i <; <;
0 0 ü .J .J .J W UJ W UJ UJ
....
'1J
e
I'
v; VI
e ë
,;; GI
!!1 ð en E
ro <f) ,E GI
3: <f) .¡¡; >
't) 0 0:: 0 ro
e U .. e
yoy UJ Q) C. '" >-
't) 13 .5 ro ü .>£ tJ
Q) e
~ e >- e Q) .>£ Q) Q)
Q) U z:. '" Q)
ë x äS ü e> Q) CI
'y. U .2! ~ U ..I e
Q) e !!:!. <: '" .>£
e 0 I' Q) .c Ü Q) <I: :¡;
E .2 ü .~ (/ .¥ .>£ U 't) Q) l- e
.>£ ro 0.. .~ ñi '" VI 't) ;:) U 0 0
e - ::E (¡j GI Ë is ;:) :2 u
'" > <f) 'E CI ~ :2 I-
.0 '" VI Ü Q) '" '1J GI ..I ..I ~ 't) !XI <ft.
E U '" ëo "0 ;:) .¡: '1J 0.. 0.. en ,5 ::>
x Q) iñ äS ë3 I()
" UJ UJ U .... 0.. (j !XI ~ ~ ::¡ (/ ....
~.
Il '"
'"
N N
~ '" ....
r-. N
(Q .... ....
',. 0 0 0 0 .;, c1>
N N 0 '" '"
.... .... '<t '<t L() L()
C")
o
o
~
...
N
C")
o
,
.-
o
,
N
...
"0
0)
(/)
'S;
0)
0:::
'-'
....,
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO.~
DATE: Feb. 17.2004
REGULAR [ ]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT[x]
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY: DON MCLAM
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CENTRAL SERVICES
SUBJECT: BID #04-022/ DOLLMAN PARK RIVERSIDE (WEST)
BACKGROUND: On February 4,2004, Bid #02-044 was opened for Dollman Park Riverside (West).
Seven hundred and ten (710) vendors were notified, forty-three (43) bid documents was
distributed and two (2) responses were received. Staff recommends award to Sunshine Land
Design for a total amount of $49,773.20.
FUNDS AVAIL: 310002-7240-563000-76020 (Improvements OIT Buildings)
PREVIOUS ACTION: BOCC approval to advertise Invitation For Bid, January 6,2004, Item No. c-
8b.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid #04-022 Dollman Park Riverside (West) to
Sunshine Land Design for a total amount of $49,773.20 and authorization for the Chairman to sign
the contract as prepared by the County Attorney.
MISSION ACTION:
l1t. APPROVED [] DENIED
r 1 OTHER: Approved 5-0
Mgt. & Budget:
ou :Änderson
County Administrator
~rchaSing Mgr.: -61 ~
Other:
County Attorney: ~
Originating D~\Á {,l.t
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable)
Coordination/Signatures
Other:
Eft. 1/97
H:\AGENDA\AGENDA_DOLLMAN (WEST) .DOC
~
'-'
-..I
PREVIOUS ACTION:
September 1998 - Board granted conceptual approval to plans for development of pathway.
April 20, 1999 - Board approved work authorization with consultant, Glatting Jackson, for design and permitting in the
amount of$149,000.
October 12, 1999 - Board approved Change Order No.1 to contract for environmental requirements.
December 2, 1999 - Board approved Change Order No.2 for additional services to obtain permits.
July 18,2000 - Board granted permission to advertise for bids.
August 2000 - Bids were opened for Phase I and all exceeded the budgeted amount. They were subsequently rejected.
February 6, 2001 - Board approved Work Authorization No.5 to the contract C98-01-216 with Glatting Jackson in the
amount not to exceed $5,000 for design services for the Indian River Lagoon Trace.
May 8, 2001 - Board approved the awarding of the contract for construction of Phase IA and Phase IE to Dickerson of
Florida, Inc. in the amount of$990,038.
June 4,2003 - Board approved Work Authorization No.5 to the contract C01-05-497 with Glatting Jackson in the amount
not to exceed $9,700 for design services for the Indian River Lagoon Trace.
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends Board approval to commit to cost share in the amount of$2.5 million dollars with the Florida Department of
Transportation in the completion ofthe Indian River Lagoon Trace shared-use pathway and authorize the chairman to sign the
attached letter to commit to the cost sharing.
COMMISSION ACTION:
[x] County Attorney
[x] Originating De ,P
[x] Finance
(Check for copy 0 y,'
[] DENIED
Approved 5-0 Dougl sAnderson
County Administrator
[,j MgL & ",dg" !t(f) fIf/l f!J [>j P",h~;"g ~
[x] Project Man, ~\-\ ~ \1 . [x] Department Rev, Coor, t\
[X]EnV,ReSDiv,rf'~ ~~.. [x]Com, Dev, ~~~
[](APPROVED
['] OTHER
..,. ,
"-
...""
ST. LUCIE COUNTY
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
TABULATION SHEET - BID #04-022
DOLLMAN PARK RIVERSIDE (WEST)
CENTRAL SERVICES
OPENED: FEBRUARY 4, 2004
VENDOR BASE BID
Sunshine Land Design $ 49,773.20
Port Salerno, FI.
Dickerson Florida $108,213.00
Stuart, FI.
NUMBER OF COMPANIES NOTIFIED*: 710
NUMBER OF BID DOCUMENTS DISTRIBUTED*: 43
NUMBER OF BIDS RECEIVED: 2
·per demandstar.com
JOHN D. BRUHN. District No, I . DOUG COWARD, District No, 2 . PAULA A. LEWIS. District No.3. FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No, 4 . CLIFF BAR.'i'ES, District No, 5
County Administrator - Douglas M, Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue. Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 . (772)-462-1700 . FAX (772) 462-1294
"'"
\..--
'-'
.....,¡
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. 6A
DATE: February 1 7, 2004
REG U LAR []
PUBLIC HEARING []
CONSENT [X]
SUBMITTED BY (DEPTh Administration
TO: Board of County Commissioners
SUBJECT: Housing Finance Authority Appointment
BACKGROUND: Commissioner Barnes has requested that Mr. Thomas D. Siplin serve as his appointee
on the Housing Finance Authority.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/ A
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/ A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board ratify Commissioner Barnes appointment of Mr.
Thomas D. Siplin to the Housing Finance Authority.
'I APPROVED
rf OTH ER:
[] DENIED
COMMISSION ACTION:
Approved 5-0
Dougl s M. Anderson
County Administrator
Review and Approvals
County Attorney: _ Management & Budget:
Originating Dept: _ Other:
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)
Purchasing:
Other:
Effective: 5/96
cof\{'
'-'
"""'"
August 5, 2003
Commissioner Cliff Barnes
2300 Virginia Blvd.
Fort Pierce,FL 34982
Dear Honorable Commissioner Cliff Barnes,
I'm writing this letter to express my interest in serving on a County Board or Committee.
I am a lifelong resident of S1. Lucie County. I attended the public schools and graduated
from Ft Pierce Central High School in 1983. I furthered my education in Baton Rouge,
Louisiana where I attended Southern University. I earned a Bachelor of Science Degree
in Marketing. Because of my passion for the community for which I grew up in, after
completing my undergraduate studies, I returned to St. Lucie County. I obtained
employment with Barnett Bank for 6years. Presently, I am an Assistant Vice President of
Consumer Lending with Riverside National Bank.
I am very much involved in the community and would like to broaden my horizons with
the County. I am presently serving on the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority Board of
Directors as Vice-Chairman. I have served on the board for 7 1/2 years. Additionally, I
am an active member of the Sunrise Kiwanis Club of Fort Pierce and a past member of
the YMCA Board of Directors.
My background experiences in banking and board affiliations have provided me with the
necessary skills and training needed to serve on boards and committees. I look forward
to speaking with you or your constituents concerning any Board or Committee openings.
S~TIY' G)
0ho~Sl~in
772-460-2075 ext. 2410 (Daytime)
772-460-3974
--
meg
. '03
~
....,.¡
St. Lucie County
Board of County Commissioners
Application for Servinq on County Boards and Committees
.
Thank you for applying for a position on one of St. Lucie County's many advisory boards and committees.
The minimum requirements for committee membership are:
* Must be a County resident
*Must not be related to another committee member, County Commissioner or County employee
involved with the committee of interest
* Must not be employed by the same business entity as other committee members.
* Must not serve on more than 2 County committees
Note: Some committees have additional requirements, please inquire when submitting this
application. In addition, service on committees with planning, zoning or natural resources
responsibil¡ties may. re~uire dis~losure of fina~cial interests. + [)
Please complete the following mformatlon: ~ f:N (,y~ BCCLr.
1.
2.
3.
PLEASE ~CATE THE COM.(^IIEE(S) YOU ARE INTERESTED IN, SEE Tf:lE REVERSE SIDE
NAME: Ihn""~~ \(1. PHONE: 'l'l:t.. ~.~O-3C¡14
HOME ADDRESS: I. i p ~Uf ~e l~ 4-
N. t- , - "?J0'" r¡ ~
WHICH COMMISSION DISTR~CT DO ' U I E IN? I)i .. .fI, " . 0 . /)
BUSINESS/OCCUPATION I rres/c:Ÿf/J.
BUSINE S5 A DDRE55: I., . t· '. " '.. ,. . ,~Dpl
H.--- ."3LfS~D PHO E: ~~'i-4(,(";)o'7Sex..{-.24-J6
BRIEF RESU ~E OF tU)'; TION &. EXPERIENCE:(please attach resume)
.!Jet:. /J.- (1 M t' A) +-
= ..
~
DO YOU CURRENTLY SERVE ON A COUNTY COMMITTEE(S). IF SO, PLEASE
LIST: ~n .
WHY DO YOU THINK YOU ARE Qt,ALIFIE'f!-0 SERVE ON THE COMMITTEE(S)
INDICA TED? ..!;c;,(-:: LJ-J~l(-' ,Lu'JÙ
.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
WOULD YOU CONSIDER SERVING ON ANOTHER BOARD OTHER THAN THE ONE(S) STATED
ABOVE?(PLEASE SPECIFY)
COMMENTS:
11.
SIGNA TUR .
. i
. ATE: ~ ç; 6 '~
APPLICA nON WILL REMAIN EFFECTIVE F R LNE YEAR
Submit to:St. Lucie County Administrator's Office
2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FI. 34982 Phone: 462-1-15(0
'-'
"""
THOMAS DAME SIPLIN
1441 PINEBURKE LANE
FORT PIERCE,FL 34947
(772) 460-3974
OBJECTIVE
A MID-LEVEL MANAGEMENT OPPORTUNITY THAT OFFERS EXCELLENT
INCENTIVES FOR SENIOR MANAGEMENT PLACEMENT.
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
Riverside National Bank, Ft Pierce,FL
September 1 994-Present- Assistant Vice President Consumer Loan Dept.
Managing and overseeing a 25 million dollar portfolio, interviewing potential consumer
loan and small business applicants: processing credit requests which involves analyzing
financial statements, tax returns, and credit reports to detennine the repayment method.
Making final decision on loan requests and closing them as well. Cross-selling other
bank products, soJiciting of business development programs, including telemarking.
Barnett Bank of the Treasure Coast, Port S1. Lucie
February 1989- May 1994 - Consumer Loan Officer
Interviewing potential consumer loan applicants; processing credit request which
involves analyzing financial statements, tax returns, and credit reports to detennine the
repayment method. Making final decision in the process, preparing packages for closing;
cross-selling bank services to present and potential customer; participating in the
solicitation of business development programs, including telemarketing.
EDUCATION
Southern University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, B.S. Degree in Marketing, December 1988
Indian River Community College, Fort Pierce, Florida
Principal of Banking, Money and Banking, Life & Health Insurance
Affiliations
Fort Pierce Utilities Authority- Board of Directors (Vice-Chainnan)
Sunrise Kiwanis Club- member
Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity- Member
St Lucie Co. YMCA -Board of Directors (past)
Greater Mt Pleasant Primitive Baptist Church-Trustee and Deacon.
~
....,
August 5, 2003
Commissioner Cliff Barnes
2300 Virginia Blvd.
Fort Pierce,FL 34982
Dear Honorable Commissioner Cliff Barnes,
I'm writing this letter to express my interest in serving on a County Board or Committee.
I am a lifelong resident of St. Lucie County. I attended the public schools and graduated
from Ft Pierce Central High School in 1983. I furthered my education in Baton Rouge,
Louisiana where I attended Southern University. I earned a Bachelor of Science Degree
in Marketing. Because of my passion for the community for which I grew up in, after
completing my undergraduate studies, I returned to St. Lucie County. I obtained
employment with Barnett Bank for 6years. Presently, I am an Assistant Vice President of
Consumer Lending with Riverside National Bank.
I am very much involved in the community and would like to broaden my horizons with
the County. I am presently serving on the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority Board of
Directors as Vice-Chairman. I have served on the board for 7 1/2 years. Additionally, I
am an active member of the Sunrise Kiwanis Club of Fort Pierce and a past member of
the YMCA Board of Directors.
My background experiences in banking and board affiliations have provided me with the
necessary skills and training needed to serve on boards and committees. I look forward
to speaking with you or your constituents concerning any Board or Committee openings.
Sincerely, ~ 1\ ·A.
..--1~ G/ Iì i -
~ "L~ . - L-----
0hO as D. SIp in
772-460-2075 ext. 2410 (Daytime)
772-460-3974
. ~
ve
~3
'iJ.
"-'
"wi
St. Lucie County
Board of County Commissioners
Application for Servinq on County Boards and Committees
Thank you for applying for a position:on one of St. Lucie County's many advisory boards and committees.
The minimum requirements for committee membership are:
* Must be a County resident
*Must not be related to another committee member, Coun1y Commissioner or Coun1y employee
involved with the committee of interest
* Must not be employed by the same business entity as other committee members.
* M\.!st not serve on more than 2 County committees
Note: Some committees have additional requirements, please inquire when submitting this
application. In addition, service on committees with planning, zoning or natural resources
responsibil[ties may. re~uire dis~losure of fina~cial interests. + í)
Please complete the followmg mformatlOn: C-6~ Gt--l·~Yce.NðÙ BW-.(."G./
1.
2.
3.
PLEASE INDICA TE THE COMMITTEE(S) YOU ARE INTERESTED IN, SEE THE REVERSE SIDE
NAME: ~ Â-·y,<-ì. (;n PHONE: 1r¡:J.-Lh~o-.3cìlL{
HOME ADDRESS: I I )¡." LL \ .
(ì ')
i '. ~ Ifes/~Ýt/v'-
4.
5.
6.
7.
DO YOU CURRENTLY SERVE ON A COUNTY COMMITTEE(S). IF SO, PLEASE
LIST: ~D . .
WHY DO YOU THINK YOU ARE QhALIFIE+-O SERVE ON THE COMMITTEE(S)
INDICA TED? .!JC.c"~ tJlh(> ILf P1Ù
.
8.
9.
WOULD YOU CONSIDER SERVING ON ANOTHER BOARD OTHER THAN THE ONE(S) STATED
ABOVE?(PLEASE SPECIFY)
COMMENTS:
10.
11.
SIGNATUR~¿<AA () J/lATE: ~fjtÒ3
/ APPLICATION WILL REMAIN EFFECTIVE F R NE YEAR
Submit to:St. Lucie County Administrator's Office
2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Phone: 462-1·f5<o
=
"""
, '.."rI
THOMAS DAME SIPLIN
1441 PINEBURKE LANE
FORT PIERCE,FL 34947
(772) 460-3974
OBJECTIVE
A MID-LEVEL MANAGEMENT OPPORTUNITY THAT OFFERS EXCELLENT
INCENTIVES FOR SENIOR MANAGEMENT PLACEMENT.
EMPLOYMENT HISTORY
Riverside National Bank, Ft Pierce,FL
September 1994-Present- Assistant Vice President Consumer Loan Dept.
Managing and overseeing a 25 million dollar portfolio, interviewing potential consumer
loan and small business applicants: processing credit requests which involves analyzing
financial statements, tax returns, and credit reports to determine the repayment method.
Making final decision on loan requests and closing them as well. Cross-selling other
bank products, soliciting of business development programs, including telemarking.
Barnett Bank of the Treasure Coast, Port St. Lucie
February 1989- May 1994 - Consumer Loan Officer
Interviewing potential consumer loan applicants; processing credit request which
involves analyzing financial statements, tax returns, and credit reports to determine the
repayment method. Making final decision in the process, preparing packages for closing;
cross-selling bank services to present and potential cUstomer; participating in the
solicitation of business development programs, including telemarketing.
EDUCA nON
Southern University. Baton Rouge, Louisiana, B.S. Degree in Marketing, December 1988
Indian River Community College, Fort Pierce, Florida
Principal of Banking, Money and Banking, Life & Health Insurance
Affiliations
Fort Pierce Utilities Authority- Board of Directors (Vice-Chairman)
Sunrise Kiwanis Club- member
Kappa Alpha Psi Fraternity- Member
St Lucie Co. YMCA -Board of Directors (past)
Greater Mt Pleasant Primitive Baptist Church-Trustee and Deacon.
'"
\
ì
L
- " ..,.4I.,J'
-' '-'
-,
"'"
ITEM NO. C-6B
DATE: February 17, 2004
AGENDA REQUEST
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ADMINISTRATION
REGULAR: ( )
PUBLIC HEARING: ( )
CONSENT: (X)
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
SUBJECT:
Dr. Edwin Massey, President of Indian River Community College requests the Board of County
Commissioners send a letter of thanks to Governor Bush for his favorable budget proposal, and to the
Legislative Delegation asking their support of the Governor's budget proposal.
BACKGROUND:
See attached information packet from Dr. Edwin Massey
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
N/A
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners authorize the Board to send letters to the Governor
and the Legislative Delegation on behalf of Indian River Community College's request and authorize
Chairman to sign.
cJt.PPROVED
o OTHER:
o DENIED
Approved 5-0
COMMISSION ACTION:
Review and Approvals
o County Attorney:
o Management and Budget:
o Purchasing:
D Originating Dept:
D Other:
o Other:
Q Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable:
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the Sf. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 772-462-1777
or TTD 772-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting.
'-'
.....,
February 12, 2004
The Honorable Jeb Bush
Governor
The State of Florida
The Capitol
Tallahassee, FI 32399
Dear Governor Bush:
The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners would like to express our sincere
appreciation to you for your outstanding budget proposal supporting community colleges. We
applaud your efforts and the investment you are advocating in our State's future. With legislative
support, your budget proposal will have a major positive impact on our area, enabling Indian River
Community College to maintain its open door access and continue to serve as our region's primary
resource for workforce education.
Most importantly, your budget proposal addresses the critical problem of unfunded enrollment and
ensures open access to higher education for our students. IRCC's enrollment has increased by
10% over the past three years at a time when state funding to accommodate new students has been
non-existent. This budget proposal will significantly improve IRCC's ability to serve all students who
wish to attend college.
You can count on our support in making your community college budget proposal become a reality.
St. Lucie County depends on IRCC to meet our educational and workforce training needs. We
thank you for leading this vital initiative to fully fund Florida's community colleges and IRCC.
Sincerely,
Paula A. Lewis, Chair
Board of County Commissioners
c: Board of County Commissioners
Douglas M. Anderson, County Administrator
Dan McIntyre, County Attorney
Dr. Edwin R. Massey, President-Indian River Community College
'-'
....,¡
February 12, 2004
The Honorable Gayle Harrell (R)
State Representative District 81
Martin & St. Lucie counties
121 SW Port St. Lucie Blvd.
Port St. Lucie, FL 34984
Dear Representative Harrell:
The proposed budget for community colleges recently unveiled by Governor Bush is good
news for our state's economic vitality and the 900,000 Florida residents who depend on
community colleges to meet their educational and career training needs each year. If
approved by the Legislature, this funding package will enable community colleges to meet
the challenges of significant enrollment growth and critically important workforce training.
With your support, this favorable budget proposal will have a major positive impact on our
area, enabling Indian River Community College to maintain its open door access and
continue to serve as our region's primary resource for workforce education.
Most importantly, this budget proposal addresses the critical problem of unfunded
enrollment and ensures open access to higher education for our area students. IRCC's
enrollment has increased by 10% over the past three years at a time when state funding to
accommodate new students has been non-existent. This budget proposal will significantly
improve IRCC's ability to serve all students who wish to attend college.
Committing state dollars to community college education is a far-reaching and highly
effective way to ensure economic strength and a productive future for our citizens. The
benefits to our community include:
· A highly skilled workforce for new and existing businesses
· The ability to attract desirable high-tech businesses
· Increased earning potential for families
· A healthy and stable economic climate
· A high quality of life and productive future for our citizens
St. Lucie County depends on IRCC to meet our educational and workforce training needs.
We urge you to strongly support this vital initiative to fully fund Florida's community
colleges.
~
....,
Page 2
February 17, 2004
Governor's Budget Proposal
Should you have any questions please don't hesitate to contact me. Thank you in advance
for your continued support and consideration.
Sincerely,
Paula A. Lewis, Chair
Board of County Commissioners
c: Board of County Commissioners
Douglas M. Anderson, County Administrator
Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney
Dr. Edwin R. Massey, President-Indian River Community College
'-'
....,.¡
::::
~
-"""
.....
~
~
I'-.¡¡.
~
~
~
;;:..
--:::
~
-~
~
~
.....
~
~
ð
~
:::::
~
~
~
~
2_
~~
0) U '"
!::'E 0)
~ .~ 'ij
0) Q 0
~.~ ~
tJ ~ 'u
!l) Õ ='
:g1A:
... ~ en
g f¡<~
~ ~ ,EO:
O)Bt:
.c 0<: 0<:
E-<cñ:::S
8
o
U
<l.Ï
'"
;:3
o
~
"0
.¡::
o
~
:>,
8
.¿ @)
> ~
S~ ?;:
0) 0'1 ""
'u -.:t tJ
;:3 r<1 ..j
,..¡,..¡ ,..¡
";µ"o
en 0)" 0
~'u ~ ~
p...3rA~
¡::..;~
ell CIJ ,.-..;,:::
.... N 0<:
-i5t-8
s:J p.. t;, ~
'"
.~
§
o
U
0)
'u
.3
..;
en
~
.><:
Õ
p..
0)"
0)
,D
o
.c
U
0)
0)
.><:
o
>
o
'" O!)
0) 0)
;::;- "0 ~
~ ~ =
';:' 6 1A
~ 0" ~
ã õ 0 @)
~~'ß 00 ~
-"",uQ ~ ~
::::.¡:: "¡:: r<1 .¿
Q t;; ~ en"'¡ '2
:;5 ã "µ"t-~
-...:a~="~=
~oòJ)O)~t-~
~ ~.~ ~ ~ I ( )
g~x~x~OiI
o en 0)" :> ... N ..
xO)~<~"""':-;:::
O)~t;J-"'~e
t:cñx~~~~
'"
0)
'ij
o
U
.c
U
0<:
0)
¡:q
8
Oil
p..
~
'"
"0
ã
:a
R òJ)
- tE
'><:00
Q) t"- .~...
-E .... U
0<: .Eu ;:3 0)
:::s '" --: §
~ëSV5~
.a 0) 0)" ~
U > 0) U
~ '.g .g 'J::
O)"Q.cã
_ ( ) u ~
~ ~ ~ ~
i5 ~ð '"
= 0) ~
o~=";;>
X 0) 'E _
0) ~ 0<: -.:t
t:cñ:::sfti
8
o
U
<l.Ï
'"
;:3
o
.c
0<:
"0
.¡::
o
~
:>,
8
@)
~
-.:t X
00 U
~ ;:2
,..¡ ~
µ"r<1~
.c"~ a
g-;,~
~g;:::s
~~:-;:::
... _ 0<:
~1.O8
Q ~~
'"
0)
'ij
o
U
0)
'u
;:3
,..¡
>
o
òJ)
<l.Ï
....
g cñ ¡g
0)
g¡ ~~ ~
Õ 0<: N @)
§- õB ,D
"0 8'S 8 ~
'g 1.0 Ô en r<1 <l.Ï
"'"'N :>,~ .><:
...... ..." 0<: 0 ...
0) U 0) ~ -.:t '8
~ 'E .?: ~ ~ v5
:::s .~ ~ ;:3 M -å
O)Q ãð,..¡~ p..
:§"';eo<:µ..-o
wB ="0 0)""';'''0
i5 ~ ....." ~ S N 'g
~~]~15~:
0) Q) > V) ::9 =-'Cd
.c~0)V1o)N5
E-<cñ~~:::SC~
go .~
::9~§
0) U 0
~'E U
~.~ 0)
:::s Q'g
ã .~ ,..¡
û5~èi5
~~~8
.!:J tI) .... .!
~~~p..
o p...... oS
=O)~o
~~=N
O)(dM
]E;.a~
E-<en,s-
8
o
U
<l.Ï
'"
5
.c
0<:
"0
,¡::
o
~
S'
@)
~
~ en
~ 9
M
,..¡t-:=¡
µ.8µ'
,¿";'~
~~:::S
~t-_
ON';;
... t- 5
~t;,~
'"
,~
§
o
U
0)
'u
;:3
,..¡
..;
en
~
.c
U
0<:
0)
¡:q
58
OiIN
p.. 0) 6
l1.f·~ /:)0
0) ;:3 <l.Ï
.g~M ~
g .g~~ 5
:t: ~;:;:;"';' ~
.... 00 .><: ..... 1.0 r,:;"
8NO~~ "=:V
p.. U ...".~ -.:t ~
5'E~~M ~
~ .~ ¡:z .¡; ti 0 ~
O)Q=§ "-.:t'><:
~ ~ .~ 0 .~ ~ ;::
i5 ~ "8 µ.. ~ -;' '2
= =.....¡::.....~ p..
o ~ d"'tJ:) ....; ("f') o.
X B '£ 0 en ,.....,:-;:::
~o<:o<:~~f!e
E-<cñ:::S-p..t;,~
8
o
U
<l.Ï
o '"
V1 5
N .c
B ~
&:!"'~ i5
.....~ ~ ~
§ '5 § ] 5
b'b.~ 8 òJ) @)
O)Q.ctE ~
ZO)U 0
g .~ ~ ] ~
.....o<:¡:qO)-.:t Z
~"Q8]~3~
,DO)-µ"-.:tO'l
O<:~~.cM-.:ttJ
i5'" ....,..¡' ~
= f¡<~ 15µ..;::1Z
o~ =en "N
xB'Eo~c::i'~
~.sO<:~Bt-8
E-<en:::SNent;,~
'"
N .~
,.-..('f')"E
~u;:3
.¡:: 0
5 t;; U
-.- ~
<Qt;J
,DO»
o .=: ~
¡:q~¡:qN
~~~r<1
~ '" ... ~
... ~ ~ -.:t
o p...... V1
=O)~x
~~ã~
~~;eo
E-<cñ.Ep..
N
V1
0'1
N
M
,..¡
µ..-
"0"':::
.§";'
",0'1
--.:t
:t:-.:t
1:1
0)
:::s
,.....,....
_ 0<:
N 5
C~
'"
0'\ .~
_N....
0) .... §
p...~ 0
§-~uu
~ ,_ M
.cQ~B
~.~ ~"S
~!1ã~
O)=;e~
~ ~ d .....
ì:: O).....en
9 ~~.c
Õ 0) "0 E
"'"' ~ ... 0
......O)o<:en
0) .... ~ ~
.cO<: ~
E-<cñ¡Ì¡~
5
o
U
0)
'"
;:3
o
~
"0
.¡::
o
~
S'
@)
¡:q
o
¡:q
æ
,..¡
,..¡
~
2
'-'
'"
§ g; .~
'" E
ß '5 5
:t: '" U
~.... 0<:
.><:Qõ
ã ~ 8
~ '"ª 0
~"Q~
~ ~ 0)
i5 ~ ~
= e- 0
o~.c
X 0) fd
~!1~
E-<cnO
8
o
~
0)
'"
;:3
o
.c
0<:
"0
.¡::
o
~
S'
@)
X
p..
,..¡
~
o ~
~ ..j
~-,..¡
,..¡~g;
µ"V1p..
0)" rA 0
=oo~
.... M
> -
B =-'a
.... ~ 8
E-< '-' ~
8
o
U
<l.Ï
'"
;:3
o
~
:9
...
o
t¡:;
S'
@)
~
~
- µ..
-.:t i
0) ~ 0
0) M en
.Þ,..¡t-en
enµ..8S2
~ 0)" "';' E-<
~ Ë ~ ~
£.S ~:-;:::
('f'j CI.1 r-- ~
~;;!j 0 8
".;:.:¡~~
......;
HELP US HELP yOU....
Please join us in thanking Governor Bush for his favorable budget
proposal for community colleges and workforce training on the
Treasure Coast.
Please contact your legislators asking them to
SUPPORT THE GOVERNOR'S BUDGET PROPOSAL
The Governor's proposal is not a done deal. We need your help to
ensure that your tax dollars come home for your business and our
community.
HERE'S HOW....
· Please use your business stationery for your letters
· Print and sign the "thank you" letter to Governor Jeb Bush from the CD or
using the hard copy as a sample and mail to the address indicated on the
letter.
· Print and sign the Legislative letter on your stationery and mail to the
Treasure Coast legislators on the list provided.
· Please send copies of your letters to Jan Pagano, IRCC Legislative
LiaisonÆxecutive Assistant to the President, IRCC, 3209 Virginia A venue,
Fort Pierce, FL 34981
· Should you receive a response from the Governor's office or a Legislator,
please let us know. To let us know about responses or if you have any
questions, please call Jan Pagano at (772) 462-4804 or email
jpagano@ircc.edu
REMEMBER...IRCC is your resource for employee training, including nurses,
paramedics, police officers, fire fighters, computer technicians, business and
customer service employees and more.
With Legislative approval of the Governor's budget proposal, IRCC can keep the
doors open to educate the workforce you need.
INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE
'-'
....,;
INDIAN RIVER
COMMUNITY COLLEGE
OFFICE OF THE PRESIDENT
February 2, 2004
Mr. Doug Anderson
County Administrator
St. Lucie County Government
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, FL 34982
Dear Doug:
Governor Jeb Bush's recently announced budget is good news for 900,000
students statewide who depend on community colleges for higher education
and career advancement, and it's good news for our state and four-county
area. Florida is emerging from a recession that has impacted business and
industry from Jacksonville to Key West. When firms layoff employees or don't
hire new personnel, enrollment at community colleges soars. Laid-off
workers and job seekers take advantage of easily accessible community
college programs to improve their employment and advancement prospects.
This trend and significant population growth throughout the Treasure Coast
have resulted in a 10% increase in enrollment at Indian River Community
College over the past three years, at a time when state funding to
accommodate new students was nonexistent. IRCC's state funding was cut
by $525,000 for the 2003/2004 school year, with 600 students turned away.
Many of you have read articles in this newspaper sharing the stories of IRCC
students who had to put their dreams of a college education on hold.
Governor Bush pledged that this lack of funding for enrollment growth would
not go on, and he has kept his promise with this budget. But, it is not a done
deal!
Approval of the Governor's budget proposal by the Florida Legislature is
needed to maintain and expand IRCC's role as the region's top resource for
workforce education. The Governor's budget proposal will significantly improve
IRCC's ability to serve all students who wish to attend college and expand
programs in nursing, law enforcement, information technology, health and
business and new programs in biotechnology. We can boost the skilled
workforce for new and existing businesses, increase earning potential for
local families, and support the region's economic health.
3209 VIRGINIA AVENUE
~: ~æ!:"!. nWŒ\¡ "
wi .-- 'd· .
!. FEB 05 20D4 ~:
FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34981-556__. I
CO. ADMIN. OFFICE
'-'
.....,
The budget proposal would enable IRCC to hire much needed faculty, grow
training programs, continue expansion of instructional and student services at
branch campuses, fund operating expenses for new facilities and technology,
increase library and online research holdings, and update laboratory and
other equipment. There's an added bonus. The proposal will encourage private
giving by reinstating state matching funds that double donations for
scholarships and facilities.
IRCC serves over 40,000 people each year; that's about one in six Treasure Coast
residents. These IRCC students help to ensure your health, safety, and business
success. If you've been a patient at a Treasure Coast hospital, chances are the
nurses, radiographers and other health care professionals there completed
one of IRCC's 22 health care programs. The police officers and fire fighters
who protect your family and property are typically graduates of IRCC Public
Service Academies. The workers who staff your business keep pace with
technology through IRCC workshops and online education. Your child's
teacher probably completed her first two years of college at Indian River.
Many of our newest teachers earned their Bachelor's degree at the IRCC joint
campus with Florida Atlantic University, while others fast-tracked into the
classroom from another career through IRCC's national-award-winning
"Bridge to Teaching" program. Recent high school graduates, too, take
advantage of IRCC. About 60% of the region's college-bound high school
seniors make IRCC their college of choice.
Without adequate funding to community colleges all these people are
negatively impacted. So, please help us help you. Support the Governor's
budget proposal. Please take the time to contact your Treasure Coast
legislator with this message or make it a part of your organization's legislative
agenda. Sample letters and legislator names and addresses may be on the
enclosed CD.
Committing state dollars to community college education is a far-reaching
and highly effective way to ensure economic vitality and a productive and
prosperous future for our citizens. With your support we can keep the door to
community college education open.
Sincerely,
H
Edwin R. Massey, PhD
President
.-.
IRCC
FROM Ai
will be to work closely with
legislators to spread the
word that we need to get the
governor's budget funded."
Massey said early esti-
mates indicate IRCC will re-
ceive $3.5 million in addi-
tional operating funds and
an additional $2.1 million in
new facilities operating dol-
lars, capital improvement
funding and matching funds
to private donations.
"Our community colleges
have been starving in this
state," said state Sen. Ken
Pruitt, R-Port St. Lucie.
"They've done an awful lot
with very few dollars and
now it's time to reward the
best system in the country."
Bush, annow1cing his pro-
posal for the 2004-05 budget
while visiting Valencia Com-
munity College, said the 7.6
percent statewide increase
was the largest for Florida's
28 community colleges in 14
years.
Pruitt, chairman of the
COMMUNllY COLLEGES
Massey lauds governor's
plan to increase budget
By Teresa Wòod
,taff writer
FORT PIERCE -Indian
River Community College
can expand its biotechnology
programs in anticipation of
job spin-offs from the Scripps
Research Institute because
of its share of a $Ì04.5 mil-
lion increase in community
college funding proposed
What it means:
IRCC's share of the $104.5 million
increase in Florida community col-
lege funding proposed Thursday by
Gov. Jeb Bush means an increase
in:
~ Operating funds: $3.5 million
~ Matching private donations:
$1.5 million
~ Capital improvement fee:
$386,000
~New facilities operating funding:
Senate Appropriations Com-
mittee, said he would be
working diligently to make
the proposal a reality.
The money would allow
!RCC to increase its operat-
ing budget to approximately
$55 million and its . total bud-
get to approximately $100
million. It will help the
school hire additional teach-
ers and expand programs in
nursing, law enforcement,
infonnation technology,
health and business, Massey
said.
Some funding will go to-
ward the Kight Center for
Emerging Technologies set
Thursday by Gov. Jeb Bush~
And it won't have to turn
away students like the 600 it
did last year, said IRCC
President Edwin Massey.
"I already celebrated my'
birthday this year, but this"
seems like another one,"
Massey said at the Fort
Pierce campus. "Our job now
SeeIRCC,Ai0
$269,8ì5
~ Total: $5.66 million
Bottom line:
IRCC will be able to hire ad-
ditional teachers and ex-
pand programs in biotechno-
logy. nursing, law
enforcement, information
technology, health and busi-
ness.
Source: fRCe President
Edwin Massey
to open on the Fort Pierce
campus in January 2005,
Massey said.
The center will be the larg-
est building ever constructed
on the campus and house
programs in robotics, laser
technology and photonics,
the study of light.
"These are fundamental
courses to sUPPOli a biotech-
nology curriclÙum," Massey
said. "This is great timing
with Scripps coming in Palm
Beach County."
Also included in the gover-
nor's proposal are a 5 per-
cent increase in tuition and a
$2 per credit fee to pay for
capital improvements.
...."
Tribune 1/16/04
Massey said the increased
funding will be spread
throughout the !RCC caln-
puses in St. Lucie. J\Iartin,
Indian River and Okeecho-
bee counties, without em-
phasis placed on anyone
campus. mcc serves 40,000
full- and part-time students
and 230 faculty members.
Of those 40,000 students,
they amount to the equiva-
lent of approximately 10,000
full-time students. Last year
mcc didn't receive funding
for 1,900 full-time equivalent
students. In the new pro-
posal, all 10,000 would be
funded with room for addi-
tional students, Massey said.
The community college
budget is the governor's fIrst
for the 2004-05 budget year.
Massey said the separate an-
nouncement means commu-
nity colleges would no longer
be taking a back seat to pub-
lic schools and universities.
"He wanted to put special
emphasis on the community
college budget," he said of
Bush.
- teresa.wood@scripps.com
" '
\...r
.-..1
Tribune 1/18/04
EDITORIAL
Legìslature
sholÙd back
Bush proposal
W e commend Gov. Jeb Bush on his
proposed state budget for commu-
nity colleges and urge legislators
to fully fund it.
"This exceeds what I thought it would
be," said Edwin Massey, president of In:-.
çlian River Community College.
The $1.5 billioh budget request un-
veiled last week by Bush includes a
$104.5 million increase in direct state aid
to community colleges - at 7.6 percent,
. the largest increase in 14 years - as well
as state funding to fully match a backlog
on matching
funds for pri-
vate donations
to colleges.
During the
past few years,
state funding
for community
colleges has
lagged and this
year IRCC had to turn away 600 potential
students. Massey said that if the gover-
nor's proposal is ,adopted by the Legisla-
ture, no students will have to be turned
away and IRCC will be able to hire more
teachers, expand programs and meet op-
erational and maintenance needs.
Massey estimates the school will re-
ceive nearly $5.7 million in more funtling
than. received this ~ear.
. "Today is a different day," Bush said,
in making his proposal. "In appreciation
of what community colleges do, I'm here
with a little bit better news." .
Massey said he believes the gover-
nor's change of heart in greatly increas-
ing funding for the state's '28 community
colleges is the result of the availability of
additional state revenue coupled with
four years of efforts by community col-
leges to layout tbeir goals and funding
needs with the governor and legislators.
"It's been four years of working and
working and working and explaining our
position," he said. "I think we've finally
made our case."
Having made their case with the gov-
ernor, the next step is to make their case
with legislators.
"Our job is to work closely with our
legislative delegation to spread the word
we need to get the governor's budget ap-
proved," Massey said.
A key· legislator will be Senate Appro-
priations Committee Chairman Ken Pru-
itt of Port S1. Lucie who said, "Our com-
munity colleges have been starving in
this state. They've done an awful lot with
very few dollars and now it's time to re-
ward the best system in the country."
We agree.
"I'm hopeful, very hopeful, more so
than in years past," Massey said.
Gov. Jeb Bush lfist
week unveiled an
. impressive proposed
state budget for
community ~olleges.
Port ~ Lucie/Stuart News 1/18/04
....,
Why we need our community college.
sues, telecommunications, technology'
and the need for teachers in our com-
munity;
"They will help us with our. biotech
plans."
IRCC has three new buildings in'
some stage of completion - the Wolf
High Tech Center due for dedication
Feb. 24 in Martin County; the Ad-
vanced Learning Center in Martin
County, due to open in August; the
Workforce Building, set for a May ded-
ication, on the main campus in Fort
Pierce; and the Kight Technology Cen-
ter, projected to open January 2005,.
also on the main campus.
Keep your eyes on the Kight Center.
Its curriculum - including robotics,
laser technology and photonics - has
been formed with the help of Scripps
Research Institute's educational con-
sultant in La Jolla, Calif.
If the governor's budget makes it
through the Legislature, we can dream
again.
I haven't forgotten what Enterprise
Florida's Vice Chairman Bill Haber·
meyer said a few months ago: "I see
Scripps as a model for the future. It
may even be the coin of the realm for
... jobs" in this decade and the next.
Community colleges sometimes are
invisible.' School districts have par-
ents, universities have powerful
alumni - but community colleges
have few outspoken citizen advocates.
They need your help now.
Talk to your legislators. You know
from grim, past experience - you
can't assume that just because Flori-
da's Legislature and its governor are
both Republican, $104 million for com- .
munity colleges will sail through.
Tell them you support workforce
education.
We're hearing a lot these days
about jobs disappearing to for-
eign countries. All kinds of
jobs.
But what we don't hear about,
what's kept quieter than a Sunday
prayer circle, are the thousands upon
. thousands of jobs left begging in this
country.
Unclaimed.
Not low-paid service or agricultural
jobs, as you might imagine.
I'm talking about skilled jobs, ca-
reer positions - and most of them im-
mune from export to some Third
World country.
I'm talking about jobs as police offi-
cers, fIrefighters and EMTs; nurses
and a myriad of other health care pro-
fessionals; computer technicians;
teachers; and - of increasing interest
to us on the Treasure Coast - workers
in biotechnology.
According to current national stud-
ies, there are right now 4 million more
jobs in these skilled areas than there
are trained people to fill them.
By 2010 the number will swell to 10
million. .
I kid you not. These statistics come
straight from the United States Cham-
ber of Commerce.
Here's the rub: 83 percent of the
open jobs require education beyond
high school, but less than a four-year
degree.
They were the jobs community col-
leges around the nation were training
students to take until last year, when
virtually every state in the nation cut
their budgets for community colleges.
Florida was no different. The state
Legislature sliced $11 million from
community colleges' annual budgets
and gave them no money for enroll-
ment growth. Some 35,000 students ex-
pecting to enroll in the fall of 2003 were
shut out because the schools couldn't
afford to offer them classes. It was the
most serious enrollment crisis to hit
NANCY SMITH
associate editor
the community college system in dec-
ades. .
In fact, no one is more aware of
how a community college's shortfall
can affect the local workforce than Dr.
Edwin Massey, president of Indian
River Commnnity r.nllp~.
- "When we lose, the whole commu-
nity loses," Massey said.
Last year, he said, IRCC was forced
to turn away 600 applicants for work-
force studies. The school - seventh
largest of 28 community colleges -lost
$528,000 in state funding.
Actually, since 2000-2001, IRCC has
lost $2 million in workforce funding.
"The governor did the best he could
do in a bad budget year," Massey said.
"He tried not to dig us so deep a hole
that we couldn't climb out in better
times. But the cuts hurt a lot of stu-
dents and programs, and ultimately,
the economy of the area."
With the Treasure Coast's student
population and the cost of state univer-
sity enrollment on the rise - and with
high technology rmding its niche here
- another year of cuts could have
dealt Martin, St. Lucie and Indian
River counties a devastating blow.
IRCC serves 38,000 students. But, re-
member, only 10,000 of them are
full-time students. Generally speaking,
the rest are in a workforce program of
some kind.
That's why Gov. Bush's announce·
ment Thursday - promising that his
budget would pump $104 million into
the state's deflated community college
system - was so heartening.
The governor is offering "new, op-
erating dollars," Massey said. "Dollars
we can direct into the classroom to ad-
dress public safety issues, training is-
Contact Nancy Smith by telephone at
(772) 221-4238, or bye-mail to nan:'
cy.smith@Scripps.com. Her columns are'. .
archived on the News' website,
TCPalm.com.
.....,
EDITORIALS
...".¡
Viewpoints of the Press Journal
College works
Bush budget makes investment
in post-secondary education.
Last fall, Indian River Community College passed out
handcuffs as 'a way of telling area businesses and the media
that tight budgets were restraining the school's ability to do
its job. Gov. Jeb Bush's budget proposal promises to take off
those shackles.
Bush's $104.5 million package for Florida's 28 commu-
nity colleges includes a 7.6 percent increase - the largest in
14 years. The raise, says ffiCC Presi-
dent Edwin Massey, is a reflection of
the governor's deepening commitment
to the 800,OOO-student system.
"He understands that community
colleges are the engine for workforce
training and economic development,"
says Massey. "Florida is No. 1 among
the 16 Southeastern states in gradua-
tion and retention, and the governor
wants to keep us there."
For ffiCC, which tops Florida's av-
erages, the Bush budget plan means a
$5.6 million increase. Those funds will
ensure that students won't be turned
away, and that private donations will
be fully matched by the state, Massey
said.
This is all good news for the' Muel-
ler Campus in Vero Beach, where en-
rollment has grown to the equivalent
of 2,500 full-time students. Massey says
a new classroom building and a li-
brary are top priorities here.
With its additional funds, ffiCC in-
tends to expand its programs in nurs-
ing, law enforcement and teaching to
meet sharply higher demands in those
fields. Teachers are especially needed.
Thanks to class-size reduction, schools
in the four-county Treasure Coast re-
gion expect to hire 3,000 more instruc-
tors over the next five years.
ffiCC led the way last year in devel-
oping an accelerated teacher-training
program to put bachelor's degree hold-
ers on track for full licensure in just
six months. This time-saving, cost-
effective model initiative; which re-
ceived an additional $100,000 from Congress, ought to be ex-
panded here and adopted statewide. ..
As the local community college grows, the next logical
step will be to offer selected four-year degrees. Whether that
happens through continued patinership with Florida Atlan-
tic University or independently, the demand is increasing
for post-secondary education in Indian River County ¡md
along the Treasure Coast.
For now, Bush's budget bolsters the community college's
efforts. That will help to produce a better-educated, higher-
paid workforce for this region. And that, surely, brings a
good return on investment.
Facts
about
college,
work
>- Full-time
equivalent en-
rollment at Flori-
da's community
colleges:
55,715 (up 23
percent in four
years).
>- 71 per-
cent of the
state's commu-
nity-<:ollege stu-
dents transfer
to the state uni-
versity system
after earning as-
sociate's de-
grees.
>- 52 per-
cent of Aorida's
teachers
started at a
Aorida commu-
nity college.
>- 83 per-
cent of new
jobs will require
education be-
yond high
school, but less
than a four-year
degree.
Source: Indian
River Commu-
nity College
Press Journal 1/25/04
10metown News 1/23/04
. '--'
.....IRCC may get $5.7 million
..
By Jay Meisel
staffwríter
Indian River Community
College WIll be able to
mamtam an open-door
admission policy and hire
at least 12 new instructors if
Florida GoY. Jeb Bush's pro-
posal for community col-
lege funding is approved by
the Legislature, the presi-
dent of IRCC said last week.
IRCC would receive about
$5.7 million in additional
funding under the propos-
al, said Dr. Edwin R. Massey,
IRCC's president.
"It's the largest budget
increase for' community
colleges we've seen in 14
years," Dr. Massey said.
"We're very excited about
that."
"I've already celebrated
my birthday," he said. "It
almost seems like another
one."
One of the biggest bene-
fits of the increase will be to
high school students who
want to continue their edu-
cation, he said.
This past school year
IRCC rejected about 600
student applicants because
of budget constraints, Dr.
Massey said.
But with Gov. Bush's pro-
posal, "We would not have
to turn away any students,
he said.
Gov. Bush's proposal,
which was unveiled last
Thursday in Orlando,
includes an additional
$104.5 million in operating
money, or a 7.6 percent
increase from the previous
year, for community col-
leges statewide, Dr. Massey
said.
For IRCC, it would mean
$3.5 million in operating
funds that would allow the
institution to hire more
instructors and admit addi-
tional students, he said.
Dr. Massey said that its
Staff photo by Jay Meisel
Dr. Edwin R. Massey, president of Indian River Community
College, explains how IRCC would benefit from Gov. Jeb
Bush's funding proposal for community colleges.
likely IRCC would hire at
least 12 additional instruc-
tors in such areas as health,
business and technology
and public service.
IRCC woiùd also receive
$1.5 million in matching
funds to match contribu-
tions from private individu-
als' he said. IRCC has
already received the local
donations, he said.
That money would go for
equipping and construc-
tion of the Kight Center for
Technology, he said. Once
the building is completed in
January 2005, IRCC plans to
add robotics, laser and
study of light programs as
part of a biotechnology cur-
riculum, he said.
Additionally, IRCC would
receive $269,875 toward the
operating costs for build-
ings, such as electricity and
$269,875 from a $2 per
credit fee for capital outlays
and improvements.
The latter money would
largely go for renovations of
buildings, he said.
In all, it means about a
7.38 percent increase in
IRCC's operating budget, he
said. Dr. Massey estimated
that IRCC has an operating
budget of about $55 mil-
lion.
The increase would bring
state funding up to par with
IRCC's growth, he said.
Because of the previous dis-
parity in the funding growth
and enrollment increases,
the college hasn't received
funding for the equivalent
of 1,900 full time students.
Most students at IRCC are
part time and the number
of full time students is
based on combining the
hours of part-time students.
The additional funding
would be used to benefit
programs at IRCC's main
campus and at its branch
campuses in Vero Beach,
Okeechobee, Port St. Lucie
and Martin Gounty, he said.
Dr. Massey said IRCC will
start a campaign in support
of Gov. Bush's proposal.
He's hoping that students
and others in the commu-
nity will send e-mail and
letters to legislators in sup-
port of the funding
increase, while adding that
he's confident of support
from the local, legislative
delegation.