The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 06-29-04 ~ ,.I _~ '<; . ,~*t;¡~1"fj¡.,);.>:;'f ..~~""ji'rt^f:*,rt1¡;~~""'!;,'t>'#"~q'i~~ ,,_~' ~~;\.¡.,¡~:..\~....,~,......cI ;1'¡;::¡¡"cf¡- 1':~~~1t' .:I:"~~(""'"J'd~':'}\·:!'ß:."({<)\<",~ "1 ~ ........=1.'.,. ,~~,~ '1;/!\.1'.?>; },)o \,."I"''''"" " "'i"" "~~,.,,," .-.~.....~~.-"" 'i~f.;~P'~l~~~;'~4'f~~~~'Ï~~~p~'~{! <f%!~~~~~:Íþ~1' 1ì~ JUNE 29, 2004 4:00 PM SPECIAL BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME ALL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED. PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES AND PAGERS PRIOR TO ENTERING THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS. GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES - Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA - Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items, which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS - These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesday at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION - Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS - These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT - Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting of general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM - Please be respectful of others opinions. MEETINGS _ All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 6:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Assistive Listening Device is available to anyone with a hearing disability. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at (772) 462-1777 or TDD (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. '-' ...,; BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us ~:'};i&~~:~;;¡t{ :;Ü:>I~~;;;~ ~:. C< ~;,~ jf-!!-~~r~;:"': S'-š ?-~ ~.P!-'"': .:>' :.-~" Paula A. Lewis, Chairman John D. Bruhn, Vice Chairman Doug Coward Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District No.3 District No. 1 District No.2 District No. 4 District No. 5 June 29, 2004 4:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE SR 1. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT ADMINISTRATION C~JJu.fJ,ì","O)'\ MOkø\ - .5/rðp ~CO»vt\erðohw. 5eUh\"uA b'1. Ûtr\fY1 . CD\W.~ Proposal for Criminal Justice System Assessment - Consider staff recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners declare a bid waiver and an emergency contract per Purchasing Manual Section 5.5 with the Institute for Law and Policy Planning for a criminal justice system assessment in the amount of $99,480, approve Budget Amendment No. 04-158, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract. huhn./ ND ~~hìl\5<íVJ" ~ es ~cNVo.("J - N' ò b:tr-~l- ~ - ~ es ltlVì5 ' ~es NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (772) 462-1777 or TDD (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. \w- ...", _:,;<:[ '" ....... r , , ..... 'e"- :., . 'ø;, " '~" -;. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADDITIONS AGENDA JUNE 29,2004 REGULAR AGENDA ~~1. ADMINISTRATION \\(6 I\- Transfer of Inmates to Highlands County - Staff is requesting direction from the Board on the .\>-~~ I ~ transfer of 25 Inmates to Highlands County. huhn / ~es ~tJ,ìf16rft1 / No CffiVM ð / YeS bf.(ne5 /f\fO ~t7 -' Ye~ NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (772) 462- t 777 or TDD (772) 462- t 428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. - ... '-" ...." .,. ITEM NO. RA 1 DATE: June 29, 2004 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR: (X) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: ( ) SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ADMINISTRATION TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Transfer of Inmates to Highlands County BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: 001-2300-5340000-200 -- Other Contractual Services/Contingency PREVIOUS ACTION: Board Agenda on June 8th and revisited on June 15th RECOMMENDATION: Staff is requesting direction from the Board on the transfer of 25 inmates to Highlands County. ~PPROVED o OTHER: o DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: Approved 3-2 Commissioner Hutchinson - No Commissioner Barnes - No Review and Approvals º County Attorney: -º Management and Budget: º Purchasing: º Originating Dept: o Other: o other: º Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 772-462-1777 or TTD 772-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting. ~ 'wi COUNTY ADMINISTRATION EMORANDUM 04-129 FROM: Douglas M. Anderson ounty Administrator DATE: June 28, 2004 RE: Jail Overcrowding BACKGROUND: Monday, June 21S\ the Jail Overcrowding Subcommittee held their first meeting consisting of Captain Walsh and Major Tighe of the Sheriff's Office, Jody Renc of the Public Defender's Office, and Jason Berger of the State Attorney's Office. It should be noted that Jason Berger and Major Tighe traveled to Alachua County with Commissioner Barnes and myself on June 1ih. The attached report, prepared by this subcommittee, contains suggestions to assist in alleviating jail overcrowding. The report also discusses their review of 1,230 inmates and their findings and opinions. Also attached is listing of those inmates. The "X's" mean that they were determined ineligible for release by one of the agencies. Attached is a June 5th list of 25 inmates that have been identified to be transferred to Highlands County. Judge Angelos called me Friday and said that she would issue a Court Order to transfer these inmates once I have submitted it to her. Captain Hinman of Highlands County has contacted me on several occasions stating that Highlands County is receiving pressure from other counties to rent beds to them. At this time, he is holding these beds for us. RECOMMENDA TlON: Staff is requesting direction from the Board on the transfer of 25 inmates to Highlands County. DMNab 04-129 c: Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney Citizens' Budget Development Committee Public Safety Coordinating Council Attachments ~ j -' INMATES TO BE TRANSFERRED NAME RELEASE DATE Aguilar, Gabriel Andrews, Michael Joseph Barfield, Antonio P. Caldwell, Gabriel A. Collins, Michael Lindell Evans, Charles Elliott Gonzalez, Lazaro Hendrix, Asa Hernandez, Heriberto Hill, Lawrence John Jones, Doublas Glen Lasecki, John Peter Lecanu, Maurice Pierre Luisi, Vincent James McGee, Richard McLean, David Jr. Melchor, SolQIJ1()Il~u Monds, James Anthony Murray, Jimmy Owens, Robert Earl Pierce, George Edgar Prince, J ohnnie ~.. Saucedo, Jamie E. Settle, Jacob Adam Srouji, Azmi 08/31/04 09/17/04 09/05/04 11/17/04 10/18/04 09/28/04 10/18/04 09/01/04 01/05/05 02/17/05 09/15/04 10/02/04 12/05/04 11/08/04 03/19/05 09/03/04 01/11/05·- 09/08/04 12/27/04 09/18/04 09/26/04 10/10/04 10/02/04 08/29/04 10/15/04 --------~-~--- -- - .~-_._---_. - -- --- ~--------_._- - .----_.--_.~-- .- -- .. .-. --- ----~--_...- __.____.____~_____ "_________ _.__~_____._______. ______u__ - ------ -- --- ---_.- -------- - .---- "'wII List #1 06105/04 /;':, J un, '25. 2004 \..tB PM ...,):120 p. 2/4 - To; Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie COl.mty.. Fr.Ofn: Jason D. Berger, A:35istant State Attomey, St. Lucie County Court Supm-isor Jodi Renc, Assistant Public Defender Major F. Patrick Tighe, St. LucIe County Sheriffs Office Directr>l" of Department of Detention Captain Pat Walsh, St Lucie COtIDty Sheriffs Office _ Ope¡-atio:G.s C~¡q.mander, Department of~eterttio:n Date: June 23, 2004 Subject; JiB Ove:t'crowcfulg 011 Monday J1U1e 21, 2004, Capt Walsh and Major Tighe of the St. Lucie C01U).ty Sheriffs Office, Jodi Renc of the Public Defenders Office. ~~d Jas011 Berger oithe State Attorneys Office were assigned to revÍe"\vand discuss the j ail 0vercro\vdiDg issue in order to meet the require.ments of the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County. The issues discussed are· outlined as follows: <\ 1.) The status and chargesoÏ all 1 ,:nQj~at~§ wf::r~¡ev¡~,wecl.on ~W!~;U, ~QQA!~,~~.~,."c~.~~c"" . . _u .--- rhB findings and opinions of this mee1fu.g areas follows~A'g!eat n1~joritY'öfa1iofilie 1nmãtes::~=::'-- .::.--=.:-::--~. c~ently b~þtg hOllse.d in the St. Lucie County Jail feJJ into the follow"Ùlg categories: -------.--'~ -- -_.-------- a.) b,,) c.) d.) Inmates in jail on high xisk/serious .Folony charges Inrnate.s in jail on vio~atioDS of probation In..111at~.s inj-ail-for fai.liPg to appéat""for-cöutt- - --- ----- ~----- --_.- _._on Irimatcs injail on multiple cases1 multiple charges, andlor holds Jodi Rene, Public Defe:nder1 is currently assigned to work in the cou:tIt)~jail. Jodi reviews jail cases on a daily basis. and Jodi resolves cases \vith the State on a daily basis. Bottom line is that cases are being resolVed daily, and new cases are coming in daily. -_.._~--:.......- ------ 2.) Sugge$tion: Conduct a County Court Jail Decket every Friday: The sµggestion has been raised to conduct a County Court Jail Docket every Friday moming (rcgardless oft1\e alphabet of the defendant, as is done in Martin County). A final docket would be set by the clerks office, and would be provided to the State Att()meys, :Public Defend~rs,~d the S1. Lucie County Sheriff's Office Ja.it no later than 3:00 pm on ~ve+y Tuesday (cåses . processed afterw-arcis would be placed on the following Friday's Jail Do¿ket.) . The' State v.:öú1d - .. then f.orward plea offers by Thursday morning, and the Public Defenders would presèntthe plea ~~.:n _(J~e!5. tc;) t~eir cli~?-~ pri.or.!o th~!Jj~~l!~I?_<>{;~et::__.=~~.~ ~ =_~_.~:~:_ _:.,=:.:===~..:.::-==:::-=-.::.c-=_::i::~~~~~ __._____. .n_ ---- --------.--.--.--.-. --...-. --_.~_._- - ,_.. --.--- ----.--- ..~- ..--- - ---------...-..--..- + -. -. - -- -_.._~ --.,...---- ----.... .--.--------.-------- --..------------ .---- ----- .-- _________.__n..___..__ _ _. _______ ___.__..__._____________________u_· .- --- - - _..--_.^- --- -- .. -- ~ ~--'" .-' ---=-'~-~~-~-~-~_..-_.~.--- -~-,.~--~._------- --------------- ---- __'__'_ _. _______ _ _~n_ _ ____._. .---.... ...._..___ _____ ..n.·__·_··_ . .--.-------.----. .. --- --- .-.-- ------ - - - - - ...-.---- --------. --- -- ~-.- -- '- .-- .-------.-- -.---------. . -..-- --.--- - -- .---- -.--".----.------.-------. --. -----. - ----- -- -'- -. .. .. i\ r-:.~-,I.(r.;R·aO\V1~ 'r F \ . JUN' 2 5 2004 j . F'····, . - u-u-----·T~o~~Ä6M¡N. OFFICE ._u__._._~ __ _ . .._. __ .__ _... .... _ _"n.. _. .. _ ____ . . . .--.--'-- . ----.--------- ---- ---- - - - - -_.- ..' - .._---"- - -.- .j Ij Ii ' 25, 200 11 1 2 : ~~ No '"?O p. 3/4 ...." 3.) Suggestion: Package Plea AgrEe:IIlents a.) An attempt should be made by all to resolve all of a defendants pending felony cases at me same rime with his/her other pending cases (felony and misdemeBIlor.) , b.) An attempt should be made by all to resolve all of a defenda:nts pending misdemeanor cases at the same Q.me vrifu his/her other pe)1din~ misdemeanor cases. The suggestiön is to have: a standing Administrative Order al1ow:ing County Court Cases to be transferred to Circ.uit COUl-t for purposes of resolvwg package plea agreewents. 4.) Suggestion: Plea Agreements at First AppeßIaD.ce Currently, the S1- Lucie County judiciary t~e tums handling f11'st a.ppearances on a. weekly basis These first appearance hearings occur during various times, depending on whichj~ge is handÍing thero. The suggestion is to have a 1 :00 PM concrete time in wbich first appearances arc scheduled and handled (other Circuits have a retired''''first appearance" judge handle first appearances in the afternoon.) There are currently an average cÌ 15 to 40 first åppca.rances per day. With a finite 1:00 PM schedul~ for first appeara.u,fes, both the State A~omoy's Office ànd the Public Defenders Office can schedule for and be ',Rresent to attempt to resolve misdemeanor cases (not involving victims.) This suggestion would require the clerks office to furnish the SAO v>'ith a copy oftb.e arrest affidavit, NCICI FCIC and/or drivers liceme records, so that ancc.c-' infor:r.o.ed plea offer cån be made (currently the State Attorney'.$ Office does not receive-my pqperwork atfust appearances.) Othervlise, without any paperv.rork o'r information, the State cannot be prePared to make any plea offers, ' ----------- ------_.- --- 5.) Baker ActslMental Health Patients: " Currently there are se~era1 mentally ill indivitl~ beïng booked into the jail becau5e-'tl~~~~;;}~-~- health receiving! treatment facilities are full, and/or will not admit them. Not only do many of these jnd~.viduals not belong injail~ but they are also taking up space ill the jails m~dica1 unit (which more than doubles the daily cosis.) The suggemon is to work with law enforc~mcnt and the mental health coro.rouníty tò improve the mental health process and ensure that individuals who require mental health treab:o.~nt are properly placed in a mental health facility. ----~~~--' 6.) Notices to Appear/Arrests Made by Law Enforcement: Currently the jail has be~n doing Notices To Appear on those individuals eligible for xelease upon a.o:~st. The: p~rson is arrested, fingerprin~oo, booked, photographed, and then released on the notice to appear. This process has helped the jail overcrowding s1tllation tremendo11S1y, while also ensuring that the defenmwt's arrest is properly documented. ---- ~._--~ ---_.~_._. ." ,.-- -_.._.---~--~ .-~-------- _._---------------~_. --- ------------------.-.----------------- - _. ___,._ __n_______·_____·_ ----------------- -- " .-- ------ ____ __,,______ __.___ _u_ --------,-------- ____________n. ----- -.------- ----.--..-- ---------- dun,25, 2004 12:~ No -1,0- P. 4/4 ~ 7.) Suggestion: Upgrade the jails fIrst appearance room to a. courtroom setting Curre:n:t.ly, the jails fust appearance room has very'poor a~oustics. The 5ugge.stiOD is to upgr.ade~ the jails 11rst appearance room to a courtroom setting with proper acoustics, carpeting, aLd permanent seating. (See the first appearance rooms in Alachua, Bra-ward, Dade and Orange Counties.) 8.) Electronic Monitoring! GPS System with or VIlthout requited day reportip.g: Thïs I)ugge~tîon would allow qualified offenders to remain out of jail (pre-trial) on an electtomc monitor. The offender would be required to pay for the monitor a.t a cua:ent est:iroate of $1.00 per day. Offenders could also be required to check in daily \vith a reporting officer. 9.) Jailsreportingrequirements: Theja.t1 currentIyprovides amontbly list-to the Judges and to Court Admin.1stratiO!1 of those individua1s held on misdemeanor for greater than 75 days, and thQse individu~s held on Felonies fo:ç greater then 150 days. . Respectful1y Submittç:d ~(9- ~ '. Jason D. Berger~ ~stant State Attorney. St. Lucie Gòunty Court Supervisor JOdiRenC'A~sistant~ubliCDefea~.r ...... Ji~ ....- MikjO:\ F-- Patrlck Tighe? ,. --r;:?--i-; /' )' ¡) . ........q, T civt..~--- ~ Director ofD?partment of Detention ~ n ù ./J~II} ß / Captain Patricia Walsb, l./6<.iQz:; ~~ - U/~---- --- Operations Commander> Department ofD~te.D.tion -- ----..----...-------- .- ------- --~.._-_._--._----------,_._._-_._- --..- --_..--- -- -------_._.-~ ~._ .__.________________ __n.._ 0- _ __.____________ _ -------- ----,_.~--- ---------- ---_.~ -.--.------ -------~-------- -- -_._._----~--- . -_.'------- ..- ---..- ------------ -- V' '-" ..., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. SR2 DATE: June 29, 2004 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] SUBMITTED BY: Administration PRESENTED BY: [ ] TO: ST. lUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Proposal for a Criminal Justice System Assessment BACKGROUND: On June 22, 2004, the Board of County Commissioners gave staff directions to proceed on negotiations with the Institute for Law and Policy Planning to do a criminal justice assessment for St. Lucie County. FUNDS AVAilABLE: 001-9910-599100-800 (General Fund - Contingency) (BA 04-158 Criminal Justice System Assessment) PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners declare a bid waiver and an emergency contract per Purchasing Manual section 5.5 with the Institute for Law and Policy Planning for a criminal justice system assessment in the amount of $99,480, approve Budget Amendment No. 04-158, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract. Approved 3-2 Commissioner Bruhn - No Commissioner Coward - No £URRENCE: Do~s M. Anderson co~~' Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: [JC] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED Coordination/SiQnatures County Attorney Management & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept: Public Works: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) H:\ WOOO WORD\AGENDA W\JAILASSESSMENTDOC '-" ~ BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: OMS/ADMINISTRATION PREPARED DATE: 6/22/2004 AGENDA DATE: 6/29/2004 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME AMOUNT TO: 001-1110-531000-100 PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $99,480 FROM: 001-9910-599100-800 CONTINGENCY $99,480 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: FOR CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM ASSESSMENT CONTINGENCY BALANCE: $473,958 THIS AMENDMENT: $99,480 REMAINING BALANCE: $374,478 DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: BA04-158 DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: DEPARTMENT Approved Budget Administration BA04-110 BA04-115 BA04-116 BA04-117 BA04-117 BA04-121 BA04-127 Administration BA04-129 BA04-133 BA04-133 BA04-133 BA04-137 BA04-144 BA04-145 BA04-148 BA04-153 Proposed action: BA04-158 ~ ...." FISCAL YEAR 2003-2004 FUNDS APPROVED FROM CONTINGENCY GENERAL FUND AMOUNT REMAINING: $473,958 ITEM ACCOUNT # Contingency 001-9910-599100-800 Chilled Water System for Thomas J. White Stadium G/L Interfund Loan *** Treasure Coast Sports Comm (TCSC) Increase Transcriber/Dual Cassette Reformatter Chopper/Brush Mower Fence Repair at Lawnwood F-Ball Stadium Fence Repair at Pepper Park Loan for a van. United Veterans will repay. Treasure Coast Opera Society/ Mini Grant Program Thomas J. White Stadium Interfund Loan-Field Padding G/L Interfund Loan *** Research-Education Park Lincoln Park Community Center Extended Hours Lincoln Park Community Center Extended Hours Lincoln Park Community Center Extended Hours Appraisals for Purchase of Harbor Branch Shrimp Property Establish a Special Event Fund New Position of Strategy & Special Projects Director Heathcote Botanical Gardens Transportation of Inmates Total used: Balance Available Criminal Justice System Assessment Balance Available After Proposed Action: *** Interfund Loan for the Thomas J. White Stadium Chiller System AMOUNT 1,000,000 $125,000 $25,000 $2,293 $1,913 $12,000 $12,833 $18,189 $20,000 $36,154 $51,000 $2,160 $9,300 $2,800 $10,400 $50,000 $20,000 $27,000 $100,000 $526,042 $473,958 $99,480 $374,478 '-' ..." COUNTY ADMINISTRATION MEMORANDUM 04-124 FROM: Chief Judge Angelos Diamond Litty, Public Defender Bruce Colton, State Attomey Ken Mascara, Sheriff Garry Wilson, Chief De uty Pat Tighe, Major - Dire or Tom Willis, Court Adm n str r Douglas M. Anderson, ,i[;]nty Administrator TO: DATE: June 22, 2004 RE: Criminal Justice System Assessment The Board of County Commissioners will hold a special meeting next Tuesday, June 29, 2004, at 4:00 p.m., in the County Commission Chambers, to discuss entering into a contract with the Institute for Law and Policy Planning (ILPP) of Berkley, California, to perform a criminal justice system assessment. The project approach will include several tasks, including: · Assessment of Inmate Population · Crime and Inmate Population Projections · System Assessment and Evaluation · System Coordination Recommendations · Space Use Evaluation · population Profile and Tracking Studies I have contacted both Allegheny County, PA, and Hillsborough County, FL., and have received high recommendations to use ILPP. The amount of the contract to perform this task, which will take approximately 16 weeks, is $99,480, including travel. Should you have any questions or wish to discuss this study priorto next Tuesday's meeting, please' contact me. You also may wish to attend the meeting to Ie am more about this proposal. --------- .-- -------~----------- --------- .--------- _________n__.·__ _ ------.....----------- _.d ___.. _, ___u DMAlab 04-124 ____.. ___ __~________~_..__._ _0----'· ..-. -----~._-~.._.- .- ____ _.UP.· c: Board of County Commissioners Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator Dan McIntyre, County Attorney '. Toby Long, Finance Director, Sheriff's Office Ed Parker, Purchasing Director Public Safety Coordinating Council "-" -- - .-- _____H Citizens' Budget Development Committee -- - .___.__.'.u_____. _____'n_ . v ..", COUNTY ADMINISTRATION MEMORANDUM 04-120 FROM: Board of County com~rs Douglas M. AndersonfJiounty Administrator TO: DATE: June 21,2004 RE: Criminal Justice System Assessment I have contacted both Allegheny County (Pittsburgh, PA) and Hillsborough County (FL.), regarding their experiences with the Institute for Law and Policy Planning (ILPP) and the Criminal Justice System Assessments performed by them. Alleqhenv County Contact: Ray Bil/otte, District Court Administrator Mr. Billotte said that Dr. Alan Kalmanoff, Executive Director for lLPP, was fabulous and that he made significant strides in dealing with the criminal jusflèe system while dealing with egos and politics. Allegheny County was so happy with the first work product performed by ILPP that they brought them back for a second time under a second contract. Some of the first issues they addressed were jail overcrowding and probation. He said they identified and narrowed down the key problems and presented options to the County. One of the outcomes from this assessment was the establishment of a Criminal Justice Policy Board that is functioning to continue to address issues within the judicial system. Mr. Billotte could not have been more positive regarding the work product performed by ILPP. The cost of the first study was approximately $100,000. Hillsborouqh County Contact: Pat Bean, County Administrator She stated that they did good work for Hillsborough County and addressed overcrowding at the jail. They suggested two or three things that helped additional pre-trial interaction. However, one of their suggestions was not implemented because of the Bail Bondsmen's . ..--- lobbying efforts, but this was not the fault of lLPP. ...-.-------- .- - -- m__~_._~_:.-:.~:== _. -..------ ... - ..- _.. Another implementation that was recommended and approvèèJwas thaCfhe- County"':"::::=~-=:: Commissioners fund a Criminal Justice Specialist as a County staff position. Shé said that· -- the BCC is now getting "the straight scoop". This individual was hired from the Department of Corrections. _____.____._.n______ ~ """ .." Page 2 June 21, 2004 Criminal Justice System Assessment She said this study helped a lot and also the study has opened the door for many grants the County is noW receiving to assist in funding law enforcement. The grants are applied for and overseen by the Criminal Justice Specialist. She summarized her comments by saying ILPP would be well worth our investment. DMNab 04-120 c: Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator Dan McIntyre, County Attorney Citizens' Budget Development Committee Public Safety Coordinating Council Chief Judge Angelos .---- ---------------. - .. -- - ._-.-------"""'._----------~ - - .- --.------ __.._ _---r--- . ..'. .--.------..- _.___.0 __ ___ - - - .- ------ --- ._-< - ..- -- ---. u._____.___·_·· .- ...._ "."_ - 0_'" ._" -... -...-------------. ---- -.- - -. ---.------ ....--+------ _H_ ._ -... - .. '-' ...I ~9r¿;z INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Douglas M. Anderson, County Administrator C.A. NO: 04-951 DATE: June 22, 2004 SUBJECT: Criminal Justice System Assessment - Contract with the Institute for Law and Policy Planning BACKGROUND: Attached to this memorandum is a copy of a proposed agreement between the County and the Institute for Law and Policy Planning to conduct a Criminal Justice System Assessment. The proposed scope of work is attached as Exhibit "A". The proposed schedule is 16 weeks and is sent out in Exhibit "B". The cost of the assessment is $99,480.00 Funding is available through 001-9910-599100-800 (General Fund-Contingency) The Board has recently authorized the construction of two new jail pods with a budget that exceeds $20,000,000.00. The Board has also approved an Interlocal Agreement with Highlands County to transfer inmates on an interim basis to the Highlands County Jail at a cost not to exceed $100,000.00. The Board has also requested County staff in conjunction with the Sheriff's staff to investigate the cost and feasibility of constructing a "low cost/low technology dormitory/facility". In view of these actions, staff recommends that the Board declare an emergency and waive the RFP process. RECOM M ENDA TION ¡CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board declare an emergency, waive the RFP process, and enter into an agreement with the Institute for Law and Policy Planning in the amount of $99,480.00, as drafted by the County Attorney. DSMjcb H : \Agenda Memo-DSM-Law&PolicyInstitute. wpd .. '-' ..,¡ CONSULT ANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this 29th day of June, 2004, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the IICountyll, and INSTITUTE FOR LAW AND POLICY PLANNING hereinafter referred to as the "Consultant". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the County desires to retain the professional services of the Consultant to provide a criminal justice system assessment; and, WHEREAS, the Consultant desires to provide the County with such services. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of their mutual promises made herein, and for other good and valuable consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged by each party, the parties intending to be legally bound, hereby agree as follows: 1. GENERAL SCOPE OF THIS AGREEMENT The relationship of the Consultant to the County will be solely that of a consultant. The Consultant is an independent contractor and is not an employee or agent of the County. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to establish any relationship other than that of an independent contractor, between the County and the Consultant, its employees, agents, subcontractors, or assigns, during or after the performance of this Agreement. The Consultant will provide the professional and technical services required for the successful completion of this Agreement in accordance with practices generally acceptable within the industry and good ethical standards. 2. SCOPE OF WORK The scope of work to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement is attached as Exhibit" A". -1- '-' ....,¡ 3. PROJECT MANAGER The Project Manager for the County is Douglas M. Anderson at (772) 462-1450. The Project Manager for the Consultant is Alan Kalmanoff at (510) 486-8352. The parties shall direct all matters arising in connection with the performance of this Agreement I other than invoices and notices, to the attention of the Project Managers for attempted resolution or action. The Project Managers shall be responsible for overall resolution or action. The Project Managers shall be responsible for overall coordination and oversight relating to the performance of this Agreement. 4. TIME OF PERFORMANCE The Consultant shall complete the assessment in accordance with the schedule attached as Exhibit "B". 5. COMPENSATION The Consultant shall be compensated for all services rendered under this Agreement as follows: A lump sum of $99,480.00 including all costs and expenses. All invoices presented to the County for payment shall be on a Request for Payment form approved by the County. Payment shall be based on percentage of work completed. 6. DEFAULT: TERMINATION A. FOR CAUSE If either party fails to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement in a timely and proper manner I the other party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice of any deficiency and by allowing the party in default seven (7) calendar days to correct the deficiency. If the defaulting party fails to correct the deficiency within this time, this Agreement shall terminate at the expiration of the seven (7) calendar day time period. With regard to The Consultant, the following items shall be considered a default under this Agreement: (1) If the Consultant should be adjudged bankrupt I or if he, or it, should -2- '-' ....., make a general assignment for the benefit of his, or its, creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed on account of his, or its, insolvency. (2) If the Consultant should persistently or repeatedly refuse or fail, except in cases for which an extension of time is provided, to provide the services contemplated by this Agreement. (3) If the Consultant disregards laws, ordinances, or the instructions of the Project Manager or otherwise is guilty of a substantial violation of the provisions of the Agreement. In the event of termination, the Consultant shall only be entitled to receive payment for work satisfactorily completed prior to the termination date. B. WITHOUT CAUSE Either party may terminate the Agreement without cause at any time upon fifteen (15) calendar days prior written notice to the other party. In the event of termination, the County shall compensate the Consultant for all authorized work satisfactorily performed through the termination date. 7. FORCE MAJEURE Neither party shall be liable to the other for failure to perform its obligations hereunder if and to the extent that such failure to perform results from causes beyond its reasonable control (financial difficulty shall not be considered a cause beyond a party's control), all of which causes herein are called "force Majeure", including, but without being limited to, strikes, lockouts, or other industrial disturbances; fires; unusual climatic conditions; acts of God; acts of a public enemy; or inability to obtain transportation or necessary materials in the open market. The party unable to perform as a result of force majeure promptly shall notify the other of the beginning and ending'of each such period, and County shall compensate Consultant at the rates set forth herein, for the services performed by Consultant hereunder, up to the date of the beginning of such period. If any period of force majeure continues for thirty (30) days or more, either party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement upon ten (10) days prior written notice to the other party. 8. ASSIGNMENT The County and Consultant each binds itself and its successors, legal representatives, -3- '-' """ and assigns to the other party to this Agreement and to the partners, successors, legal representatives, and permitted assigns of such other party, in respect to all covenants of this Agreement; and, neither the County nor the Consultant will assign or transfer its rights and obligations in this Agreement without the written consent of the other. Nothing herein shall be construed as creating any personal liability on the part of any officer or agent of any public body which may be a party hereto. The Consultant agrees that the persons named in the scope of work shall provide services as described therein. The services of the person(s) so named are a substantial inducement and material consideration for this Agreement. In the event such persons can no longer provide the services required by this Agreement, the Consultant shall immediately notify the County in writing and the County may elect to terminate this Agreement without any liability to the Consultant for unfinished work product. The County may elect to compensate the Consultant for unfinished work product, provided it is in a form that is sufficiently documented and organized to provide for subsequent utilization in completion of the work product. 9. SUBCONSUL T ANTS AND SUBCONTRACTORS In the event the Consultant requires the services of any subconsultant, subcontractor or professional associate in connection with the services to be provided under this Agreement, Consultant shall secure the written approval of County Project Manager before engaging such subconsultant, subcontractor or professional associate. 10. AUDIT The Consultant agrees that the County or any of its duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of three years after expenditure of funds under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Consultant involving transactions related to this Agreement. The Consultant agrees that payment(s) made under this Agreement shall be subject to reduction for amounts charged thereto which are found on the basis of audit examination not to constitute allowable costs under this Agreement. The Consultant shall refund by check payable to the County the amount of such reduction of payments. All required records shall be maintained until an audit is completed and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, or three years after completion of the project and issuance of the final certificate, whichever is sooner. 11. PUBLIC RECORDS The Consultant shall allow public accesS to all documents, papers, letters, or other -4- '-' ....., material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by the Consultant in conjunction with this Agreement. 12. INSURANCE Commercial General Liability: The Contractor shall maintain and, prior to commencement of this contract, provide the County with evidence of commercial general liability insurance to include: 1) premises/operations, products/completed operations, (including XCU hazards) and personal and advertising injury for limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence; 2) fire damage for limits of not less than $100,000 per occurrence; 3) medical payments for limits not less than $5,000 per person and 4) a general, per contract/project, aggregate limit of not less than $2,000,000. The policy shall also provide the County will be given a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation or non-renewal and include County as an additional insured. Business Automobile Liability: The Contractor shall maintain and, prior to commencement of this contract, provide the County with evidence of business automobile liability insurance to include: 1) coverage for any automobile for limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit (bodily injury & property damage) per accident and 2) Personal Injury Protection (Florida no-fault) with full statutory limits. The policy shall also provide the County will be given a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation or non-renewal and include County as an additional insured. 13. INDEMNIFICATION The Consultant covenants and agrees at all times to save, hold, and keep harmless the County, its Officials, Employees, and Agents, and indemnify the County, its Officials, Employees, and Agents, against any and all claims, demands, penalties, judgments, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees, and liability of every kind and nature whatsoever to the extent arising out of or in any way connected or arising out of the Consultant's negligent performance of this Agreement. Only those matters which are determined by a final, non- appealable judgment to be the result of the negligence of the County or the negligence of a third party who is not an agent, employee, invitee, or subcontractor of the Consultant shall be excluded from the Consultant's duty to indemnify the County, but only to the extent of negligence of the County or such third party. The Consultant hereby acknowledges that the payments made under this Agreement include specific consideration for the indemnification herein provided. -5- ~ ....,.¡ 14. PROHIBITION AGAINST CONTINGENT FEES The Consultant warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, to solicit or secure this Agreement, and that he has not paid or agreed to pay any persons, company, corporation, individual or firm, other than a bonafide employee working solely for the Consultant, any fee, commission, percentage, gift or any other consideration, contingent upon or resulting from the award of making this Agreement. 15. NON DISCRIMINATION The Consultant covenants and agrees that the Consultant shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment to be employed in the performance of the Agreement with respect to hiring, tenure, terms, conditions or privileges of employment, or any matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of age, sex or physical handicaps (except where based on a bonafide occupational qualification); or because of marital status, race, color, religion, national origin or ancestry. 16. VERIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT STATUS The Consultant agrees that it shall bear the responsibility for verifying the employment status, under the Immigration Reform and Control act of 1986, of all persons it employs in the performance of this Agreement. 17. NOTICE A II notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier service, telecommunicated, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid) return receipt requested, addressed to: As To County: St. Lucie County Administrator Administration Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue fort Pierce,. Pierce, fL 34982 With A Copy To: St. Lucie County Attorney Administration Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue fort Pierce,. Pierce, fL 34982 -6- '-' ..,J As To The Consultant: Alan Kalmanoff Executive Director Institute for Law and Policy Planning 2613 Hillegass Avenue Berkley, CA 94704 or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this Section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered (a) on the date delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. 18. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The Consultant, its employees, subcontractors or assigns, shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the performance of this Agreement. The County undertakes no duty to ensure such compliance, but will attempt to advise Consultant, upon request, as to any such laws of which it has present knowledge. 19. TRUTH-IN-NEGOTIATION CERTIFICATE Execution of this Agreement by Consultant shall act as the execution of as truth-in- negotiation certificate stating that wage rates and other factual unit costs supporting the compensation of this Agreement are accurate, complete and current at the time of execution of the Agreement. The original Agreement rates and any additions thereto shall be adjusted to exclude any significant sums by which County determines the Agreement rate(s) was increased due to inaccurate, incomplete, or non-current wage rates and other factual unit costs. All such rate adjustments shall be made within one year following the end of this Agreement. 20. NON-WAIVER The rights of the parties under this Agreement shall be cumulative and the failure of either party to exercise properly any rights given hereunder shall not operate to forfeit any of the said rights. 21. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The Consultant represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no -7- '-'" ..",¡ interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder, as provided for in Section 112.311, Florida Statutes. The Consultant further represents that no person having any interest shall be employed for said performance. The Consultant shall promptly notify the County in writing by certified mail of all potential conflicts of interest prohibited by existing state law for any prospective business association, interest or other circumstance which may influence or appear to influence the Consultant's judgment or quality of services being provided hereunder. Such written notification shall identify the prospective business association, interest or circumstance, the nature of work that the Consultant may undertake and request an opinion of the County as to whether the association, interest or circumstance would, in the opinion of the County, constitute a conflict of interest if entered into by the Consultant. The County agrees to notify the Consultant of its opinion by certified mail within thirty (30) days of receipt of notification by the Consultant. If, in the opinion of the County, the prospective business association, interest or circumstance would not constitute a conflict of interest by the Consultant, the County shall so state in the notification and the Consultant shall, at his/her option, enter into said association, interest or circumstance and it shall be deemed not in conflict of interest with respect to services provided to the County by the Consultant under the terms of this Agreement 22. LITIGATION SERVICES It is understood and agreed that the Consultant's services under this Agreement do not include any participation, whatsoever, in any litigation. Should such services be required, a supplemental agreement may be negotiated between the County and the Consultant describing the services desired and providing a basis for compensation to the Consultant. 23. DISPUTE RESOLUTION Any disputes relating to interpretation of the terms of this Contact or a question of fact or arising under this Contract shall be resolved through good faith efforts upon the part of the Contractor and the County or its Project Manager. At all times, the Contractor shall carryon the work and maintain its progress schedule in accordance with the requirements of the Contract and the determination of the County or its representatives, pending resolution of the dispute. Any dispute which is not resolved by mutual agreement shall be decided by the County Administrator who shall reduce the decision to writing. The decision of the County shall be final and conclusive unless determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be fraudulent, capricious, arbitrary, so grossly erroneouS as to necessarily imply bad faith, or not be supported by substantial evidence. -8- \.f ...., 24. MEDIATION Prior to initiating any litigation concerning this Contract, the parties agree to submit the disputed issue or issues to a mediator for non-binding mediation. The parties shall agree on a mediator chosen from a list of certified mediators available from the Clerk of Court for St. Lucie County. The fee of the mediator shall be shared equally by the parties. To the extent allowed by law, the mediation process shall be confidential and the results of the mediation or any testimony or argument introduced at the mediation shall not be admissible as evidence in any subsequent proceeding concerning the disputed issue. 25. INTERPRETATION: VENUE This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreements between the parties with respect thereto. This Agreement may only be amended by written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by both parties hereto. This Agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit and section headings are for convenience only. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Agreement, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit for St. Lucie County, Florida, for claims under state law and the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted, made and executed this Agreement in counterparts each of which shall be treated as an original upon the terms and conditions above stated. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY -9- WITNESSES: '-' G: \A TTY\AGREEMNT\InstituteLaw&PolicyPlanning.wpd ...., INSTITUTE FOR LAW AND POLICY PLANNING BY: Print Name: Title: -10- j \ I I ¡ 1 ¡ 1 I ¡ I 1~ ~_:~-~' .-.~~: ..__n___...._____ __ __ _____...u_h. - -----~._---_.... .----...----.--- r<·,-~=~=~~:~-_~~---_ .~- ~~~~,-~- ~~:_:~ .:" 1 1 . .__.··h_._ _... ._.__ '-' """" Criminal Justice System Assessment St. Lucie County, Florida PROJECT ApPROACH/ METHODOLOGY The following outline of the proposed project tasks is followed by a narrative, describing the project approach in detail. Task Outline ORIENTATION TASK 1: Assessment of Inmate Population 1.1 Inmate Background Information 1.2 Admission and release information TASK 2: Crime and Inmate Population Projections TASK 3: System Assessment and Evaluation 3.1 Criminal Justice Agency Roles A. Flowchart for Misdemeanor and felony cases B. Law Enforcement/Sheriff C. ) ail Administration and Operations D. Prosecution E. Pretrial and Probation F. Courts/Court Administration - --- G. Defense H. Role of External Factors 1. Management Information Systems 1.. Roles of Alternatives to Incarceration 1. Program AväHäbility---------- ----- - 2. Participation and Potentials 3. Operations and Savings 4. Perfonnance Goals/Costs TASK 4: System Coordination Recommendations/Management Plan -.- -.-- .-------- 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.4 4.5 4.6 3.2 Range of Programs Assessment and Recommendations Case Processing Efficiency and Savings Data Base Integration and Infonnation Systems System Coordination and Savings System Demand, High and Low ----~------------ --- Perfonnance Goals and Costs- ----- ----------- Range of Programs Assessment and Rec.omm~ehdationÇ - ---- -----.-..--- .______·u _+___u_ ._________ .-----.. .-- ,-----._-- ----- ---.----....-- -..-----.. ------ --....--- --- __. ____ ..n.. ". .-------.--..---.---.-------- ------.--..-----------. ---------- --~---_.._--_..- -.-.------..- --~_.~---._-- - ._._~~. _____ _-0.' ____ _ _. ..--.. -.--_..._.- -.-- ----.... .-.-...-.-- ,--.---'--." __u.___ __._______.____ ------..- - ...--- .----.-... ------.-.-- ---.-.------------- - -_.-.- - .-- .---- -.-- _.--- ------_._-_._---~-- --. .-.... .-. .-. ---.-....-...------. .____o__________.._n__ ..__ - -- -.-. ..--- ... ..--- -.------ -.-------- ---. --..--.---+---------- --.. --- - --- - .. --. -- .-.-- -----_.. ~ s EXHIBIT It A 'I .." _.. __ 0- ._. ~ljßt~ŒI~:,f~rIPc.ª~X);~,"_:e§t~£y:!'t~AA:!P.g;¡~~:p) ::¿-i'".' .._ _ + _ _. n+ _ .,.. .. .---... - _._ _.._ ____.__u_ '-' ....,¡ S1. Lucie County, Florida Criminal Justice System Assessment ) j , 1 I } 1 j J I I 1--:-------'-- ,-- -- woo_ --- ._..' __ ._4_ n. _ u_ __ n'. -.. ...- .'- -..-- l~~~~n-~' ~~~:~~~~~~-___ ~__~u _____.___________ ______ u____· .__ ...~- . ----------------... ----- -. .... _...__...... .' ..__.___.._0_.___' ..._.... _. _ ___. n I - '. - --.----- - .----- ----.-----..--... --'- --_.~--- - -- - ------ --------- _:~:~~~ ,q-~~~i/~ ~:-~--~~--_~~::~-::~-'~-:-----: n --- -- - - ------ u___________n d -,- ,--- --- - - -- _00__ - -- --p- - --- ----=:~~~=_-~ I ~.__. _._~I~~_.~_._---- TASK 5: Space and Facility Recommendations 5.1 Facility Inventory -- Courts and Corrections Evaluation Issues 5.2 Current Space Use Evaluation/Future Space Demand A. Impact of Population Findings B. Ability of Existing Facilities to Meet Projected Need C. Overall System Plan PRODUCTS Meetings with Executive Committee Draft Justice System Assessment Report Inmate Population Report Final Justice System Assessment Report Final Justice System Assessment Presentation The narrative that follows elaborates on the above outline, and provides detail. ..+ ____...._._______. _-0 ._ _.n ____ ____u_. _ _ .._d._.' _ _.. ---------- -. _._.~---_._- ------------~.- .-- . -_..._----~ ---~--- .- -----_.._-~-- .__._--------~- ~.__.____.__ .____.__._ _.___~... _n_·_. _ . __ .4 _____ n.____.__ __.__+_.. _._0· . ..--. -.- ---~ - -. ..._-.._-----~-_..- --- --'" -.------ .. .-.~._-_._-_... --- ---_._---- . __ _...+____o.._.___________···_~__ .-- --- -- ...---.-----.- - --.. --- --+ ~-_. _.---_.._-.._--_._-----~- _ ._ ~.___ _ _ n _._ ._ _.~.._._._---------_._------------------ - . ~- -.. ---. ---~.-.._._.__._-_._----------+._- - _._____.4________··___ ------- - .~.._n..___· . ._.+ .__ - ~_ __... __. .__0_------ ______'-___.._._._.__ . . ._u ._ .. _4_~'~_.'.___· -----.------------.-'---------.---- ...._.__.'_ ___~._~._ 4___·______ -- .... ...----..- -- _.~.- .-.--.-- .-.---- ._4_·___·_ -----...-------.. _ __ ._._40__ ___..___. ____ _. .. 4_ ------- un ._..____.. ..._.. ---- ..-- .-. _n._'· ___ _ .-.--- -.----..- -.--- _.u_.____· - ..-. .-----....--. --.- -- --- -- --- .-.- -- . ---.- .......- ...____..._ .4__ I 1 1 1 - r I )" '-" '-' St. Lucie County, Florida Criminal Justice System Assessment ORIENT A TION Identifying the assessment's mission and facilitating communication at the beginning of a study has a direct impact on how the consultants and criminal justice officials interact throughout the project. This orientation meeting will be a chance for Judges, the Court Administrator, Chief Probation Officer, Sheriff, Public Defenders, city Law Enforcement, County Commission and County Administrator refine the work plan, identify problems and clarify goals. TASK DETAILS TASK 1: Assessment of Inmate Population Understanding the nature and dynamic of the offender population and its propensity to grow and change in the future is a major basis for other planning elements in the criminal justice system study. Offenders, after all, create the demand, which drives the need for most services. 1.1 Inmate background information A profile of the inmate population describes criminal, adjudication, behavioral, social, and demographic characteristics of the group at a specific point in time. A representative sample of inmates from the county's jail facility will be sampled and data collected on each. Some of the data characteristics that ILPP will collect for analysis include: . Demographic (age, race, sex) Offense (felonies, misdemeanors) Prior Arrests and Convictions Residence Release Modes and Mechanisms Employment Status Arresting Agency Adjudication Status Custody Security_Levd______ .--,- Use of Bail/Bond .-"--..--.--- - ------ - - .,.-.--.. --- -.--.---- . An independent classification system based on national standards and the National Institute of Corrections' model is used to re-classify the profile sample. This will test the county's classification system in terms of its usefulness for long-term corrections planning as well as for its impact on the jail population. The profile also may point to many possible areas of delay in the post arrest processing system. 1.2 Admission and release information --- .---.-_.---_..-.. ". .-.---------.--.-- - ---~. ---_..._..~.._._---_.- 0- .'..__ ----- .-----.----. -,...------_._--- . -. . ..---.- .-- ..---_. - -- -----..- -------- An inmate tracking analysis follows a sample of inmates from booking through release to evaluate the efficiency of the flow of offenders through the system: . Tracking inÏiÏatès -shows the----- .--- n__ number of persons entering the jail, the length of time that theyiemã.in~ arid the timing-arid Iriõde----:-~---:--:~, by which they are released.-This -type-of analysis can- derribristratè-poirits" iri"theflow _which- may_-==--____ be made moreefficient~savirig] åil beds·and _other"ï:e5òurces-:-:Jf1eadš J6:anaIialYsis~öf:ªltemªJiY~.::--=:~-~ procedures a's welÌ äs- custo¿iÿ- fuciHti-ëS-andI)fograms.- _________~~~-~~~~_---'n----- - ,---- '___n. n_ ------ ~- ._-- - - -".- - u.__ _________ .------.--...-.. .. --"- -.._.-----~- -----_.._~--_._-- --... ..- - -. - -- _ ___ ____u__ _ _ - -- ----.. --- . -. __. _ _._ _ __ __. _. _ ...n.__ ___.. __. .-.---- - ,J~ti!ýt~..,f()r.~~jy:;.t&,]æ~HIçfæ!~ì;ilii.iíg[@rr):¥.Im~·Î~¡~~.;j~-~2rT:"~J~,~}~~~~Cir;:~;;~:;'sj2j:i,~~:~"sjs:fu~~!:'¡;·¡¡'Dlr£~~íi~_~§,¡;t.9º~,¡~:~:'1'§1¡ _____.___._ ___.____..u ___..__ .......__..____. -- - ...-- -_.- -.----..-.-------------...- .-----.-..........--...----.-. _.._-~---,----,._------- '-' ...." Criminal Justice System Assessment St. Lucie County, Florida " ILPP chooses a two-week sample of bookings in two representative periods over a year to follow offenders through the county's system. Generally, booking rosters and jail population data provide the data needed to complete the analysis. The tracking analysis begins with a cross-tabulation of booking charges and release modes. The number of cases and average length of stay for each charge-release pair can highlight areas where processing could be accelerated. This is a powerful tool in evaluation of overall system flow. The tracking analysis complements the profile by adding factors such as average length of stay, the impact of out-of-custody bookings (e.g., an arrestee who is cite-released in the field by an arresting officer and then brought in for photos and fingerprinting), and release modes broken down by charge. TASK2: Crime and inmate population projections ILPP gathers demographic data on the county to identify growth patterns for the general population and for crime prone age-cohorts. A 20-year projection model will then be developed. Examination of demographic data (criminal record, age, residence, income, etc.), which is compared with national crime and arrest trends to identify groups who are most likely to comprise the future inmate population. To create the projection model, ILPP begins by collecting data on arrests, crime rates, booking rates, and county and state population growth using census and local planning department data, and prior studies. In developing the model, consideration is' also given to policy factors that have an impact on jail population. These include: the court-ordered jail population caps, various programs that are alternatives to courts and jails, state sentencing laws, and other policies and practices which could have a direct or indirect impact on court and inmate population growth or decline. ___ _n____ TASK 3: System-wide Assessment and Evaluation 3.1 Criminal Justice Agency Roles All criminal justice agencies will be contacted at the project's outset, and meetings and interviews with department heads and staff will occur as the project develops. Prior to interview scheduling, ILPP requests currently available data from each agency or office relating to budgets, staffing, workload, and annual/monthly reports. The data allows ILPP staff to prepare for -------- interviews, but more importantly, to acquaint the team with the nature of the county's ________n__ organization overall, and the types of available current resource allocation. _._._----~- A. Flowchart for Misdemeanor and felony cases. _ _____n______. . -- . - ---- -.- --. .._~_._---- ------.---.-----.----..---.. ___._..., .__. _no. .+.___ n._. _ ._..." "-".--., - ------.------.----- ILPP willânalyie both Ïi1išdèri1eano(and IelQhy cases from booking through release;(g:v~!':1~~~_=~~~===_~~ the efficiencyoftheflowu()foffêÏÏdërs-tbiòugh-the system. ' .. u_ - u_______________ . _ ___. __'__-0 _______ -- - ---.------.. :,!ti~titût~'X<>i-·;Jd~~f:¡:~',ItQHçý]f@ì.ili.wg;rm;pp)~~~ftj7,1?'îi-'·- - - ---------..--..--.--.------ ._.. -_.--------- - '- ...." Criminal Justice System Assessment St. Lucie County, Florida B. Law Enforcement/Sheriff This review will prima1ily be of the local Police Departments and Sheriff, but all law enforcement agencies in the county will be reviewed. Areas of review will include budget, staffing, and workload in light of: The number and location of arrests Number of agencies, if any, with limited short-term lock-up spaces Transportation practices Relationship with the State Attorney Witness management C. J ail Administration and Operations Areas of review will include budget, staffIng, and workload in light of: · Release authority (e.g., emergency release powers, stationhouse citation in lieu of custody) Sentencing authority (e.g., good time/work time and county parole) Patterns and policies in accepting or rejecting additional persons/defendants into facility (e.g., weekenders, state inmates) Internal operating procedures such as the use of a fonnal management infonnation system and a classification system to allocate jail beds__ _ · Jail medical and population impact.." _"'_d'~'~~-':~"==='C='-.~=_'= - --~_... -.- -.-------..-------------------- . D. Prosecution Areas of review will include budget, staffing, and workload in light of: · The time period between arresnmd thë-fotrrtä:l-rëView-(screening)--and,filing-or---------- dropping of charges Screening and charging practices Policies and practices relating to bail · Practices relating to sentencing recommendations, including sentencing patterns and use of alternatives · Incarceration priority and case scheduling . - .. -.. . ---------.------- --'---.--'--- ~---- ... -- - . -. ,-- ..... .-.. - - _ __._ u·_~_·____ . - . .- - .-- -. .--- .-.-._- - ,.-. .- -. ..--------.-.- --.------------- --. _. --. -. --.--- ....-- ------...---- _ _._.. _ _ ____.___ ___u... _____ ..___. _ ____ ~__ _ _u_ _____.___. ~__.___. .________.___..__ u_. _._..__n .._~_u_____·__·__ .. --------..---------.--..----- .__ _. _.___.._~_ 0___._.-.---------- on __ __ __.__..___0_" __._.~ - - -- -..- - -- ,.--- --- ---- -- _ ~o.____ __. _nu ___.. ,__ "_. ; ¡ -+ - --- -- ------- ------- .--. --- - ---+---- --_._------_._-_.--~---- --.------------- ~-- --- - --.- ---.--- --------..------- --------.------- - -. - _..--- -~--.... -- . - ++__ . ___ ___ .___+...._ ,._. - .___~___.._______. ___ ___n_ ---.---...------. --.- ¡---- I I - - - -~_.. ..-.- --. ----.------------------- .------------- - ----------------_._-~_._-----_._-_._--- .. _....._ 0- _____._ _._._ _... .._--.+_..._-+ - ._---_._---_.~ ...---..-- -".- .. ._._... ________ .___ _. __0____--+----_·- _.~ _._ .__.._. .n__._ ..._._ _____.._ ._._.._u,~ _ __ _ .u_____.__ _____ .___ __+~ __ u ____.____ ____________+_______________. ---~----.-.---. -.-.---~-.. ----. ------- ------ ------- --- -- ---- ------ -+-- - - ---- - -------------- _ u ._. __. + _H_" ._ n ._._~ - - .,---- -- --~ _.- _____. .._____ 'm - +- --+ -. ._-_. - -- _ _._.. ____+_ .___..___n_________·__·___·_____ _____. - - ----~-------.-.-~-----_. - ~!ïfS't~ty~gf§r1~5x¡,8f...~@ë!,f~~ff!!i,~~:'~~~f),~,~~;~~~~~~~.~!¡~~~~~~~:I~TË~ffi"l~,~~Œ:::~~:~:li~~~~~~i;~~~_@.~~~~::~~~¥~~7,¡¡:i. .,'__~..._-_______ '- -..I S1. Lucie County, F,lorida Criminal Justice System Assessment E. Pretrial and Probation Pretrial will be reviewed, even if it is not a formal program, and probation will be reviewed as well. Areas of review for pre-trial and Probation will include budget, staffing, and workload in light of: Policies regarding eligibility criteria Pretrial adjudication time Time to release for each release mode and for certain key charge types · Comparison of case types by time to pretrial and post-sentence release Definitions and rates for failure-to-appear, probation violation, warrant and rearrest Length of stay Relationships with the jail and the court · Presentence investigation use and turnaround from adjudication to submission · Use of intensive supervision, banked cases, electronic monitoring, home arrest F. Courts/Court Administration The courts' role within the criminal justice system and potential for leadership will be sensitively addressed. ILPP has a long and successful history of experience in working with judges and courts in similar studies. _ _. __._~..._____u.______ --. ... ... - . _"_ ...._n ____~_,_._ Areas of review will include budget, staffing, and workload in light of: Use of summons in lieu of arrest warrants The effect of bail schedules, bail amounts and availability of bail-setting capacity Pretrial release and bail setting Practices on arrests as a result of warrants .+_.. -.-.-.. - .. Practices on continuances Sentencing practice and the effect of state mandates and population caps on sentencing Practices on the use of probation and other alternatives to incarceration Probation revocation actions Organization of any clerk/court administrator functions, in regard to information storage and retrieval Impact of the Court Administration Office procedures on speedy trial procedures for in custody defendants _and assignments · .-. ...------.-.------------------ . - -'" ---- ~ · · --- ----- --_.- . --+.._------ .. .. ... -.--- .------- G. Defense -- -... ...,.- -- ----..-. ----------- . The public defender will be studied as well as private defense. Areas of review wilLinclude -------------- ____m=~::_~ll~_get, s!affing, aD:d ~ork1oad-in-!~!è~-o-~: _~~__-:~~=.=_____ ______ p______ ___ _____u::'~~-~=~~- -------~- --.".-.---------- .. -.. ~'. - .- _ Eligibility screening and tIming afterbooking:-==-=.:::~~:~~::~::-==·::~::.:~=~:=::.::::~--= ~--:..:=;:: --:~=-----:= Policy and use of contiIlu~ce~,þoIl~reyiews and sentence modifications,- .- . Available diversion· and· sentencing options, and . usage by public and· ÏÏõnpublic- -:.- .. --::------:-::- defense advocates . ._. ___.___~___ ...__.___+_ ________ ____n______. - ------" ----- -- -,----- -------..- ....----..- --_.,------------------ -----.--.----.--..-- _.-. ----- ------ -- - -- -- ,_. .. - -- .,-.- _..' --- -.- . - -.,. - - .-- .. . .-.-..- -- .--..- -.---,-.. -. --,-.-. - --.. ..- .- . ~!.itlI!~if9·t!.¿~~![~-'P9J!Fy·g,tä,Mi~giíW!'~?~~!:J!~j~~~~r~~~~i~~J!,:(~'~'r\,!I(!·(,]~·ili,~-j~·;'-c~ ··-;~·~f~~~jl~:~;~~~î1;~?~:~'[~~:~~~~~E~.c::=.::=:===,c-. ) ) 1 J I I I ) I J I I J I I I 1- I I '- ....,¡ Criminal Justice System Assessment St. Lucie County, Florida Conflict case management H. Role of External Factors 1. Management Information Systems Although county administration does not have an impact on the jail population to the immediate degree that other system elements do, the indirect impact of its role is significant. Control over the budget and organization of certain departments playa role in criminal justice administration. The impact of state legislation, data and reporting requirements, statewide planning initiatives as well as mandates, etc., will all be reviewed. ILPP will interview the County Commission, the County Administrator as well as any assistants responsible for public safety issues. ILPP will work with each agency's staff to obtain data on planning and facility development. Similar interviews and data gathering will occur with relevant state officials. Eligibility screening and timing after booking . Policy and use of continuances, bond reviews and sentence modifications Available diversion and sentencing options, and usage by public and nonpublic defense advocates Conflict case management I. Role of Alternatives to Incarceration 1. Program Availability and Costs The types of pretrial and post-sentence programs available. will be inventoried. Over the course of many previous studies, ILPP has gathered a base of information on program availability in comparable jurisdictions. - - - .- - ---- -- ----.------- 2. Participation and Potentials The numbers of participants in the program will be determined along with length of participation, staff ratios and eligibility criteria (including exclusionary policies). Variables similar to those noted in the inmate profile section will be used to characterize the participants. 3. Operations and Savings . - -- . ----- --------------- .. . -- Operational effectiveness and impact will be examined, including resources allocated, failure rates and bed-days saved. These must, of course, be viewed in light of classifications of tnen incoming participants. . -. dn____n_ ---- ------ ---------- -.- -.+--_.'... - - - .----- - ------_._---~._.__. _n _ - - - ..._----+ .. .._n__ _____~__________ -. --.---. --.- ---., - ---- - --_.---- - ------ ------ .-- -------.-. -- ---+- --. .-.-.. -.------------------------ - ~__. .h__._________·__·_____ --.-.. ________·..u__________ ..._ -. -~~.-_..-------,--------- - ------ .- ------- ______.__ _.__.__4_ ------------ - ----.----- -.- -- ---- ------~ - - .- ---- -- - -- -- -- ------- . -------------------- - -------- -- - . ------ ---- - - ---- .---- - ---- u._ ___._ _ - -- --- - - -. - -. _._._-~-----_._------_.-- .. - - -.- -.. - ~-- - -- - -.----..------------. - -, - ...- - ..------- ---- .--.- ---. ¡,~~t!Œì~:'fº!,ç~~_~:·.P,§li,c:fl'l~Ï1Ï1ÍI1g'.@r.E)l~jj,j'.'..~;~~~~,f,~,~Jfj[~)riZt;~f~~',j·.·,:,:: ... 'jm:~~'jj~,[J urië!5,.:~ºº~jj:t~~~ ;:j ..........--..--......... ............. ...--.... ..-. - - .. -- -- -.. - . .'- _.-- ~--_..._-_.- ------------ -.-------- . - _..~ ·1 t I { I t ~ t t t r t 1 1 1· l~~':-~: .:: ::. ::, I I. n '- ...., St. Lucie County, Florida Criminal Justice System Assesst11ent 4. Performance Goals and Costs ILPP will review performance goals for the alternative programs. Overall system efficiency, perfonnance and cost benefits will guide the review. System perfonnance should maximize public safety, security and management control subject to the constraints of staff and budget. TASK 4: System Coordination RecommendationslManagement Plan 4.1 Range of Programs Assessment and Recommendations Improvements will be recommended in the areas of programs offered, resource allocation, operational practices, and program participation. The range of programs offered will be evaluated in light of population findings to identify how well program mix addresses the characteristics of the county's offender population. 4.2 Case Processing Efficiency and Savings Case processing is directly related to jail population and specifically to lengths of stay. The case processing analysis will begin with interviews of court personnel and attorneys to define the nature of the case processing system in St. Lucie County. ILPP then assesses areas where changes might speed the process. One important factor will be examining case processing in conjunction with a review of management information systems. A second area of review will look at relationships among agencies: the courts with jail management; public defender with the courts, prosecution and public defender, etc. 4.3 Database integration and Management Information Systems and Costs Court operations as well as jail and cietention facility. populations can only be effe?t.iyely managed with an accessible, useful, and consistent management infonnation system. Whether manual or automated, it is necessary that the appropriate data be collected in the first place, and employed systematically. In the justice systems, information management has afi extremely high potential for enonnous costs and enormous savings as well as enonnous errors and/or misdirection. ___u _ _._ __ __ ___ __ - ILPP has found in many cases that the system was established to track the progress of individual cases through the adjudication process. The requirements of a population management system often differ from this and the appropriate information cannot always be easily extracted from case records. For the most obvious example, thë court system may record the number and m disposition of cases through a system, while the jail manager is more interested in individuals moving through the system and how many charges are pending against them. - -- .- '.-.- -- - --- --.---.---- -- ._- .-- -- ----.. -.-.--.-.------- .---------- 0'- ._~.__ n_ _ ___._._____ - - ___ ... ___-0 ---.-----------------.-- -.---" . .--.--.---- --- .,_.~--_._---,--~----_.._--. -- ----. ..-.---+. --,----.--.. -- ._... _ ... d_ .. -- - .---+ --'--'---- - -.. .-------_. .-- -- ..--. -------------- --- .._.__.~-.-_..- +-- --_._..._-~_.- .-...-----.---- -- --~--_._--------_.--- .--_. ---. -----.-- - -------..-.. ---..-- _..--- - ---------------- ----_.- -.. -.- -. --. --- -.-..-.-.-.---..-- - - - - -~ .- --- ._-.-- --. '.' '~º_Q~:m~;~lQ, -- ~- ----_._-.- ------.-.--.. .-. ...., St. Lucie County, Florida Criminal Justice System Assessment Areas of review will include: The structure and ease of data transfer among elements in the overall data system. Availability of data appropriate for routine tracking analysis: number of inmates and their length of stay, arrayed by primary charge and release mode. For population projections, a breakdown of historical populations into various categories (e.g., male/female x felony/misdemeanors x pretrial/post-sentence). Adherence to data-gathering protocols. Accuracy of the results as perceived by local officials. Interface ability with other county criminal justice information systems (data systems used by the courts, state networks, county data processing). The adult and juvenile systems will be evaluated and planned for separately, as well as from an integrated perspective. The objective will be an automated, workflow oriented, cost-efficient system and a plan that the County can use and afford. 4.4 System Coordination and Savings After assessment of individual agencies, ILPP prepares an assessment and evaluation of system coordination. Each agency's role is looked at through the perspective of interacting efficiently with other system agencies. - ----...-----...,. --- ..n__ __._.___n_ 4.S System Demand, High and Low . ~~":--=c.-_-==-== :;==-=_,=" -.=..-_-=.::-=^'-.=~~-===:-- .-_. ---- -- ----------------- ..._~ System demand is determined based on ILPP's findings of system coordination. Areas where system coordination could be maximized are reviewed and then population findings are used to evaluate what more is needed from the system if it makes all the changes necessary to operate as smoothly and quickly as possible. Identifying system demand asks how programs could be utilized to serve an appropriate population better, what steps in the court process-mighC:1?e streamlined and so forth. During the space use evaluation, this sub-task will test whether any increase in system efficiency could solve some crowding problems. 4.6 Performance Goals and Costs -- -------..---- At the end of this task, ILPP will identify areas that stand out as capable of improvement or change that will positively impact jail and court population management and general system - - ,-- ,- --,--- coordination. ILPP will draft recommendations for each of these areas. Recommendations n - -- --- appear in the fOnTI of a draft system assessment report submitted to the county for feedbaëk~~~--~~~-;~:=-:~ Based on this review, the report will be finalized after processing of input by all concerned. ---------- - --....-..-.------.------ . . __.___u___________ --------.----------- TASKS: Space Use Evaluation -.----- ----+------- .. ------.-----.-.-.---... __ ______._ _..__. .____n·· ____~_~._ - . - - - . ... ----~----_._._- The space use evaluation logically flows from'the previoÙspföjecttaskš:u Thatis;ìn:pJ:4~tJ;!rU1!<:lª~!and. . - . --- _un the most effective way to use existing facilities and plan for expanding or construcJing~Il~Y{~91!~_s;___itjs---m-m_- essential to identify as precisely as possible the nature of facility demand and the goals of the ~cò~ritY: ,~-:.~~~-:-~~~~~, The space use evaluation will occur within the context offederal, state and local standards, requirements,-:-~-:-=:-:::: laws and regulations .--' - u_ ~- ,- . .--- --- .--.-- ----.- .--.- -_... .---------- .--..+ -- -- ._- --- -- ----~---_.-- - - _. - -_. --- ----. .-- -..-.--------- _'-'0-- ______________..___.____ ----. .----. .. ~~Ng¢]'!?;J:~Qº438~;~:!I~ :..!!ist.!t~te"I9t...L.~,~!:?:f.-..fQl,i,c;:Y':~I##nhig:@P~)js;;;: ·'"~,\E:j":.J~~~U;::,w:~:,,,mm .'. . _,_ u···· -- ... - --.--... - _._._-----~---_._--- ._. .d.._ _ .. .. _.__. - --.---_.- ,'.---... -.-., ---.-.- - ---_.~._-~-- u -. -. - --.. ---. '. '-' "wi 51. Lucie County, Florida Criminal Justice System Assessment 5.1 Facility Inventory - Courts, Corrections and Office Space This inventory will cover the current space and buildings devoted to processing juveniles, and to providing programs and services. 5.2 Current Space Use Evaluation/Future Space Demand Architects working with policy and program consultants can assess how well the mix of programs takes advantage of or underutilizes jail and court space. This integrated team, which includes attorneys, jail operations specialists and architects, will also evaluate how program changes might affect space and evaluate potential liability issues. A. Impact of Population Findings The findings of the inmate population forecast, profile and tracking studies will have already been compared with findings from the system assessment and evaluation. ILPP will have detennined the following: The type of detained juvenile population that the county will need housing for over the next 20 years; The effect of programs on reducing this future population; The level of housing security that will be needed; Changes that could be made in current classification practices to maximize existing use of facilities. B. Ability of Existing Facilities to Meet Projected Need Following a complete inventory of existing facilities, ILPP can review the impact of current and future populations' demand on housing. ILPP will determine to what degree the county's current facilities can meet current and projected need. This will fonn the basis for the next step of the facility analysis process: developing and reviewing expansion,r_e~odeling _~~ctc9_n~t~_cti9~ ()P!~~~~_,_ to ujJdate the current County Facility Master Plan. -- -- -- ------- --- .n____~__··___· C. Overall System Plan The final step is an overall juvenile justice system development plan complete with implementable recommendations on population management, programs, services, infonnation systems, and facilities. As with the adult system, each recommendation will show "pros" and "cons", costs and impacts. - --.. ..--.------..--------- - -.. -.- --- ,. ., .___ _._______.__.n_ ___..n_____·__·__· __._____ .___ _______~_ n.__ _ _.___._...... - -.-.--- ----------... . .--.--- - ._-. - - . .- ------.- ----.----- ----.- --- ---- -------.... --.-- . 0'__ - ------_._----~._-------_.._----------~ ..- --.------..:...-------------------.. ..----------------..-..-- - -_.._- ----- -.--.----- --.. ------,._------ .- -------- -------.------- -- .- -- -- -------- ------ -- - -- - ---- -------- , ' - -.+:.------..------.'--- ._--------_._---_.~-- u._. ...u__ _ ._.______.__..__.~__._._~. ..-. .-. .------~-- . -. -.--- - --- -- - - . 0..-.---_·- ___.____.._.________.._____.___________..-..- -.-.--.-.-- -.-----.------..:.....---------. --....-.-.- .--- -----.----- ------.-- ------------- ---------.--.------------=-.------- - ~ .-.----.- - - -- -_.- ---- .-. ... . ---... - ---. ___ 0 _ _____0· ...____..__. -- -- . _____ _..____n.________·____·__u_____.~ --.-----.----------.- - -.----'---'-' ~ 0 _.. 0_ .,. _..u__ _. .. ________ _. ... __._ ___ _0_.' _I~ti(ª~~,~f()t'·;~#,'x]:~;':E,QEcyæ@!IÍjijgJlli!æ)IJ~~:~~1!m!~Jt~~~;::~~~:g';':j'¡;1~~S[JIT6ill'~~1Hmi,·~~q~lli;;m:~:'Ht~;;:i8ill~~~&!i~;;!§ ;¡'gQQttili~~lgjm ." .-- . . no_.. __ .__ 0___ _ ..... ..-..- - ._._-~ ____,.._. 0'-__... . _. ._... __ _____ .u__.____·_·_· -.------..- - 0'- __ _ _ _ - - ---- ------- ------------ - '-' ....., St. Lucie County, Florida Criminal Justice System Assessment TASK 6: Products The county will receive draft population profile and tracking studies, a preliminary draft for comments, and a final report. Refer to the project schedule for timing of reports. Draft Justice System Assessment Report System assessment, space use and program evaluation findings are presented in this report. This report reflects on the effective integration of all the functions studied in the preliminary stages. Areas of major need and initial recommendations are identified. The report, which will include an executive summary of the findings and a plan for implementing will be submitted for county review of recommendations and discussion of findings. Inmate Population Report ILPP will conduct a population studies, identifying system issues that affect how criminal justice resources are used by asking the initial question: "How is the County jail being used and what does such use tell us about the county's criminal justice system?" Once the population studies are completed, the focus can then be on specific areas in the criminal justice system that can be modified to lead to improved allocation of system resources with the objective of making the justice system both efficient in terms of cost and effective in terms of accountability and public safety. .- ~ ---_.- +--- .-~-- .-- ---- -- -. _..~---- --- Meetings with Executive Committee Regular meeting will be conducted with a committee of executives in the system to evaluate progress on the assessment and identify any areas of concern. -------- Final Report - Justice System Assessment The final report will be the product of the draft reports and the integration of county input. Recommendations will be finalized and explored for cost and space impact on population management; options will be narrowed and explored in more depth to prepare the county for the next step; and finally, the report will lay out ILPP's recommendation for an overall population management plan that encompasses facilities, programs, and agencies in its scope. A formal --- . presentation of the final report will be made to the full .- - ...._,. -,-------- --,'.-.------- ------------- . - ..~--. - ---------.--- ..- -----_._-~-_.- -. --- ---.- _.---- -_._-- Final Report Presentation . -..- - --~--- ----.--.--.---- -------- ----- -~_._._---,--- A formal presentatiop. of th~ß:n~! ~ep~rtu.V\'i!~be_l11_ade t().the ·full committee ofexecutives;_the' ---.----- County Commission, and the. Count)' ~dmi~~t:ator. -. ~_u~_~-~~-u ~-'~~~~-~~-::~-~~~:"-=-~.--~~----._..~~~.'~~-- .---. ..+-_..._-_.__.._.~ -.--...--- ---..---.----- ...--- ----.------.- 0-._-------·-·--· .._.___ . __..__ __ __ ~______.n. ___________6__ _.n. _________ ___- ----. .~~ - -.-----. .._- - ... -- . - . .. . ..---.----- - ..-. - ---.-.- . -.. - ~ - .- ..--.-. --.. -.-..------.------- _. . --- .. _.u ~ __. -_ -_.-- ..----.-.--.-- - -- - .-.----- ._~ ----..--------.-- - -.- -..-.---..---. ~_.-------_._._---------- ~l~t.~Œ¡f§Í;p~Wl~~g~~Fi¡~!~"_~:?~~P:~)~¿,::"G~flli'i,Œ,¡mmm¡;m,:;lR-~mi'",;~m!!j~,!,-',~·:Jili:!; '::'i~~]z¡illilli])rË~§'~11!i~l?,!f~"flº~,,¡~~J~¡rš __..._ U" __ ..____. _______....__.__.n_ _.._. -------.-.---..-.- -.---------- - .. ----. _.- -- . -" ..- .__....__..~ ~ -I } í 1 ¡--~-- . 1 1 '- Criminal Justice System Assessment -...I St. Lucie County, Florida PROJECT SCHEDULE Task Description Task 1: Assessment of Inmate population Inmate Background Admission and Release Task 2: Crime and Inmate population Projections Crime and Inmate population Projections Task 3: System-wide Assessment and Evaluation System.wide Assessment and Evaluation Task 4: System Coordination and Recommendation/Management Plan Range of Programs Assessment and Recommendations Case Processing Efficiency and Savings Database Integration and management Information Systems System Coordination and Savings System Demand, High and Low Performance Goals and Costs Task 5: Space Use Evaluation Facility Inventory -- Courts, Corrections and Office Space Current Space Use Evaluation/Future Space Demand Task 6: Products Inmate population Report Draft Justice System Assessment Report Final Justice System Assessment Report .- .- -., .-------_.. . ... --..-' --.-- .-- --.-- .' .--.-.-. - .---p-- ----.- EXHIBIT \\ .ß II ,---------'--- - - ---'-- ---- b ~ :I 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 ------- - - ---~~--- ..-- .-------- - .-..-.---------. .-. ..-.-----. ....--- ------------ .------------- .. --. ..-...-------- ----. .-.---------"-----. .'- .------------------ .-.....------ -"- .. .-~ -'1:,"'" ·&"'P'·"'I·-·='P·l'··=·'·~·~'-PP)''''''-'''-''-'--.~. "","""'",,,---"'7·..·"'·,,,-'-. -..,'......,.,.--,,',.'."''',.'.'..'.---. '.-'.' .-~---,' -,,-' ,,,'" '!ns'tltute or' 'aw· . 0 ley- anmng " . .-,-,,,' ". ,-.'.-."".",,,'.',"'--" '" _",-,.'-,,,'.-·.'-m ",-". -...'"June 15· 2004 "'·"'14"" ' : . _ . ." _L_ ... ."j" _,,,L'- __ __~_, :,__,. ",,,"S:'j'jt,,,;:,;,":,;;-:b,,.',,,,~,,,,,.'J':l":'J""¡""~';":::'TGJ8c·''::,-;, "~"':7';':. . . .... , · .... ... . "..:j,j':,,:;'''' - ., --.---.------.- . --- ------- ------ --.------ .-. Board of Directors Alan Kalmanoff, JD, MSW, Ph.D. Board President Executive Director Lind~ (;uyden, CPA Bo)~rd Trl,.lsurer l/'iú' Prr.\"Îdent. P, U:i.:f!/;,t! lw·!/(¡¡r.~r: Shetley Bcrguln Br¡'Jrd Secretary I)Ît~dQ/: f)::1j'lI!d'pÙa/;kd Ti:/¡~¡,.'OIl.'/!.'':''1iÙ·ll!/f¡JY. In,: Rc,btrt funk Rttird (;(;Iwr.ll Coun"cI L'q!fat EmpfO)'171(>1!t OPJIOt1l11iÍtf CommÙJ'iolt Dr. l>lanchc Peadm~n ReJf'tlirb PÐ'ch(J!ogiJl Candice Wong, ;\I.D" 1\¡P.IL Ph.D. , Hea!t/> JmiccJ Rcmm:h U nim:;i(J' if Ca/!forÚl. ,r,m F"lIIcÙm I Advisory Board Members l>rian Tallgher Dep:I!)' Artorn.¿)' Gmmil California D,t'tlrtftitl!! '!fþt.l'!Ù-e ,\J1en Breed Rdin-" 1) irrdor l"JalÙJÙall tutililk r!l Corrr,,1ifJl1J !. l\lichlcl Heyman J"¡,.i~ta!)', Jl!1i!h.ÒfÌf!ian l1!.:!Îfll¡ion Sheldon 1\Jesl'inger }Jly!/Ú/or qfLm.' and Jo:ic!} (]"Ù'n:ri(l f!¡((~¡itrorni,'l. Bcrkd~y Ruth Rushen RdÙw! Diräor C~l1i.f()niÎí,lDe/Jtl1tJi..·~!:! fI/ COln.'dÙm.f Dr, !\Iimi Silbert Pn:JÎdc:r.! Dr/an'~r Strèd Fntmddri"lI Dr, Bayard Catron Prr¡ß'.(ior '!f Pllb!i¡' .,¿!(/¡;:jJfÙtn.Jlio/J (;tor:;,: U:tllhÙ.:~tOl: L 'nÙ,'r>'Î{'; Judith JI~umann _"l(ìÙ!!u:/ J¡,','r¿fd/} O¡iit.'r! qrL~f;~~, ilr! r:.d¡¡~"U:¡¿J: R~J.;ú¡"Î¡¡U!Îí}Ji Jen'Ù'(.f Nancy 1~.taC Tral!.~1'(il1tl!¡0J!/ Cllm'7J!i/!ÎI)' P~l1!II¡'{g ILPP ,2613 HIlLEGASS AVENUE . BERKELEY, CA 94704 J\¡WN: 510.486.8352 . FAX: 510.841.3710 \n\W.ILPP.COM PlANNERS@ILPP.COM - """'" . June 22, 2004 1-1r. Douglas Anderson County Manager 2300 VirgÏ1Úa Ave Fort Pierce, FL 34982 c: ß!!.'7 vJ .~yv7 Dear Mr. Anderson, Thank you for your contact j}i$ moining and for your feedback on our references; it is satisfying to be evaluated "extremely highly"! We are looking forward to set'l1ng the citizens of St. Lucie County and to working with you following your emergency meeting next Tuesday to contract for assistance with your jail crowding and justice system. \Yfe are pleased you are considering us so seriously and very much looking forward to working with you, your commission, and your county. .----~-,._~----~- ----.----~---_. . Sincerely, - .-- Dr.1!::.nof~? Executive Director Institute for Law and Policy Planning .. ---_.- ------------. -- -. ------ ? G CC' "" n "-17!"! Ð . \~Cji~!i¡~C~~;\... - ~~..~. ... ...... ..=.. --~ - - ---- -- ,.------ --~-------~---_.- - - --.-- -- - -- ---- ---~-- ---~- ------- ------ -- _.- ----- 05i 29/21304 09:,3,-,86341327207 CENTRAL RECORDS PAGE 02 'wi SEBRING (863) 402-7200 AVON pARK (863) 784-0225 tAKE PLACID (8G3) 699-3137 ~ ,r; !J..... M:.;~, ~.,~~'.! -~-....... ..~~~~~... 'I·.~·Ö {;ri·~ ,,;c:.rt'~I':'j;'.r.J." ":~;:"i J~~~....~j.~.~),' ;.;r.~>" ~" '..,,,....,'l!.'., oJ,',". "".-. . , '-. ':F':¡;¡'\~:]f. i ",._i.., '~'dJ' , \'7.~:":"~~ . .'''''-~ ' LI St;¿ ·:"'~o" ;~~l:i..w<;;...~ ,¿t~·~"''i;:. HOWARD GODWIN SHERŒF-IDGHLANDSCOUNTY June 29, 2004 434 Femteaf Avenue Sebring, Plorida 33870 Mr. Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 ßLf 67~1 C ,- ¡;$Cc.. ~ ß//(J v.:J d:)/.JrJ /Ý1 VIA FAX Dear Mr. Anderson: This is to inform you that because there has been no action to relocate St. Lucie County inmates to our facility, our Undersheriff has given me the authorization to open discussion with the other agencies that have expressed interest in our available bed spaces. In the event we receive inmates from your county prior to formalization of an agreement with another ag~ncy, we will immediately end discussion with that agency. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (863) 402-7221. E. Hmman, Detention Commander PEH:da xc: Sheriff Howard Godwin via Col. William N. Jones Carl Cool, Highlands County Administrator Major F. Patrick Tighe ,:'.: í2 ~. <=. n \\ f7. r= iì. .. .: ¡ ¿,\..~-r::" ~ I' , '/I;=J ;,"1. ·~l ~UN!9{004J CO. ADMIN. OFFICE '-" TO: Garry Wilson, Chief D FROM: Douglas M. Anderson DATE: June 29,2004 RE: Inmate Work Program ..".¡ COUNTY ADMINISTRATION ORANDUM 04-132 This is to confirm this morning's telephone conversation that the Sheriffs Office will make available to the County inmate work crews at $25 per hour. The $25 is to cover the cost for off-duty deputies to supervise the inmates. County staff will be putting together a work program for these crews. Ray Wazny, . Assistant County Administrator, will be coordinating this with you. DMAlab 04-132 c: Board of County Commissioners Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney Marie Gouin, Management and Budget Director Don West, Public Works Director Pete Keogh, Parks and Recreation Director Leo Cordeiro, Solid Waste Manager ~ Q Board of Directors Alan K2.lmanoff, JD, MSW, Ph.D. Board President Executive Director Linda (;uyJ~I1, CP¡\ Board Tr,-J:mrer v"'i~'( PIl.ddcr.!. P''!i;k'l!/i'/ l¡;,mn¡r.,-c Shetley Bcrgum Bo-J rd Secretary P¿'dOl: f)~:tf,¡,¡JDÙ,¡/;kd T¡:¡~.,,·(J/lj/Hjjlii:il:'lm!.,. In,,: Rob<:rt Funk R<:circd (;(;l1cr.\1 Counsel Equa¡ Er,¡pIOj'l71e,// Oppod/mi(y (;(;/7/mÌJsior. Dr, Blanchc l'earlm:m Rm"'''¡J P~1'f!xJf¡¡gÙ/ Candice Wong, M.D., M,P.H., Ph.D. Health .lmicr.< Ru((/n.'h [J r,iUTSi(y tf Colifim:i,¡. J,m FIi/lli"Í.<'YJ , Advisory Board Members Brian Taugher D'1'/If)' At/ol1l-[)' Gm:'ra/ co/frol1li,¡ D~foar/1J1mt tfJ"s!i,~ ----.--. Allcn Breed Rllin·tf Dit'rdnr Natioj¡:J/ ltutitilk tf Corrr.1iollJ I. Michael Heym:m J('I'~!a!}', .fmi¡h.ìrJui:Jll J,!.;';'II!!on Sheldon Messinger })ropuor q(uIJjI alld Jodcty lrff!z':rJi!y of(~;/i/òr1J¡d..13frkel~, Ruth Rushen Rrliml Dirrdor Gl!.!J()n¡j~l D~pt111Ii;~!:! '!f C.lJl1iYlžQlI.'· Dr. Mimi Silbert P''-fi&r.! DrL'lIl'~r J/T~r/ Fœ/lld.¡/i",¡ Dr. BayarJ Citron Prqf¡".ìltil" if Pllb!k /ldJiJiJ!b"/rt.JlioJl (;tOfJt U:a."¡JÙ!£Ior. l..'r.Ù"îìi{,· J udith H~UtThIlll1 .-JI'.I"Ù!!1J:t Jr:"~!:J!ì ()/;;,v rr..' 'I:d' '. .:,.. ._._:h" t!:, "'1.~...711.. -. ,~..':lU.OI. R:!JrJ.t.'il¡fû!HJIi .\:n-¡,·u Nancy l~aac TrJI!.~-P(il1{ll¡nJ!í Cllmi:1!I1!Î!)' P¿l1!1/¡'~g ________ _ __ _ ILPP ,2613 HILLEGASS A VENYE BERKELEY, CA 94704 ~lUN: 510.486.8352 FAX: 510.841.3710 \~.ILPP.COM PUNNERS@ILPP.COM .."".¡ June 22, 2004 'Ad'! C', ß:f.,'7vJ ~yv7 - .---_. - --.. -------------- Mr. Douglas Anderson County Manager 2300 Virginia A ,e Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Dear Mr. Anderson, Thank you for your contact tb:> morning and for your feedback on our references; itis satisfying to be evaluated "extremely highly"! We are looking forward to servl11g the citizens of St. Lucie County and to working with you following your emergency meeting next Tuesday to contract for assistance with your jail crowding and justice system. We are pleased you are considering us so seriously and very much looking forward to working with you, your commission, and your county. - -_-:0 ".-.>_.-.. -' _.--, - _. . _____._____u_ __..___.__ .------.- --------- .- - Sincerely, - _.. - .__.. - ___. 0_' _ .-. . - - .-.- ..------.--------------- -. - ~~:f Dr. Alan Kahnanoff . "f Exècutive Director Institute forLa\v and, Policy Planning _ -------------- ?ß-(G\$n\V7~ ~, - - ,.\ · · """':J; - ;'; -JU~~ 2_~~/I,t~ ~', -__- _=_ ==<_~:~_- -~--~- _ - ----'-- - -- --- OM'" -."'r-,-.r',....\ - - .=-~---- ----------- GO A '\' . p,.d' ...~ -- . : ,'0-:. '...J~ . ,~ - --~_: . ~- .-- ._~ --------.-- -..---.------ ---- ~-_._--_._---- . ---~-- -----.- --.. --------- - ------------ _.______._ u_ ---~---_._- ------.--- ----~---------.----_.-.- '-' ....I Page 1 of 1 Douglas Anderson - Use of Inmates From: To: Date: Sub' CC: f'1/ 0/'·1¡t. ~ 61 /-7Jd:1~ . ~ rr7 Reply Requested: When Convenient The last time the Parks Division used inmates was on October 11 & 12,2003. Prior to that date, we would use inmates approximately once a month for various projects, including beach cleaning. We would use 10-12 inmates each time, accompanied by a deputy. When the program was changed to have County supervisory personnel being responsible for the inmates and the accompanying paperwork, rather than have a deputy being in charge, we discontinued using this service. h)P .//r.\ nocuments%20and%20Settings\Administrator\Local%20Settings\ T emp\G W} 000... 6/28/2004 , " '-' ...I TO: COUNTY ADMINISTRATION MEMORANDUM 04-133 FROM: Douglas M. Anderson DATE: June 29, 2004 RE: proposed Cost - New Jail Pods Please find attached the proposed operating cost of the new jail pods. However, we have been informed by the Sheriffs Office that these numbers are not accurate, and that they are in the process of revising these projections. DMAlab 04-133 c: Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney Marie Gouin, Management and Budget Director Citizens' Budget Development Committee Attachment Ø6-29-' ß4 11:,-, FROM-S.O, FINANCE 7724623275 T'''''¡ P02/ØS U-.:j54 ~mMOR<\1'WUM TO: Doug Anderson, County Administrator FROM: Toby Long, Director of Finance DATE: June 29,2004 SUBJECT: Projected costs of new jail pods Attached is a copy of the five year projected costs of the new jail pods. Please keep In mind that these projections ''\'ere made over a year aeo. Population increases both at the jail and the community bave increased more rapidly than was anticipated in these projections so actual costs will be higher. iJ ~~--=n\ì7;-- "' ~11 ~~;;9 ~~u~L ,_ I I CO. ADMIN. OFFICE "" en cn¡ ~- t;: . Q $ ~~ I') >- ..; ......10 0 gM ~ \f)~ ~ ~ ~\!j N~ >- ri ......<ð ... !:'1M .... ~~ It) g lõ!õ &! '" ...... CO >- M .....¡ .., ~8 ~o t;; 00 ...... ........ 0'- c:ñ (CUI du5 N OM ~~ N .. ..N a:: M .-..¡ r"i >- ~ g ~ ~ ~; N '-lM ~ 8 0. N cc 10 c:ñ It) o .. M ...: m ~ ~~3 r?N ~~ tOO N ~ c ~ N «> In c:ñ It) ......~M ~g¡ ~~ .- o ..... t? to.: ~ (J'J o ~ ~ z w i a.. o o I- ~ 0. ::> ~ ~ -' I&J Z Z o ~ ~ t.!) z ~ w a.. o )- -I < ~~~ ~z.... ~!3!@ O~ID W~I- ~::>¡ :ita! -:1i 1--- fß~8 .....I 6'.... elM 0.."'1. ~J~ 9N UJ ~ ~ ru ~ ~ fa ÏííIß..I æ ~~ffi ~ !i~~ :i w_~ :Zon~~CI: ëño:>~1! ~~~§~ ~~fi1~~ ~~~;!~ w~:3:~ ~ogø", ~::~~Ï!)c.o ~c.o::!<::>~ ::>wo::::EOz m~Q.zc::> :1i~<- 0 ~~1ii~~~ '-' ....,¡ COUNTY ADMINISTRATION FROM: Douglas M. Anderson, EMORANDUM 04-131 TO: Board of County Com DATE: June 28, 2004 RE: AdditionallLPP Letters of Reference Please find attached two additional letters of reference for the Institute for Law and Policy Planning (ILPP) discussing the benefits of the services they have performed. DMAlab 04-131 c: Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney Citizens' Budget Development Committee Public Safety Coordinating Council Attachments . ---_..-..._----~-- --- - ---... -_._~ --- _u_.. ________ ____ .-__ _..______Uu___ ______ --- ---- -_.__._~-- -- -- __ ___u_ _ ..------ --- -- - - - - -------- ---- .__._-~--- . - \w ....,J PANIEL H· MABLEY CH IE:. J JQOE: C.170... GOVE:RNME:HT CENTE:R 300 60l.TH StllTH STRE:ET M NNEAPOLIS, M1NrCE:SOTA. 55487 (812', 34e·3~e I FÀ)( ~612: 348-2131 ~T..:\..TE. Olr è'oIr:-;¡:-;¡v.SQT A FOT;"RTII .1 IJIHCl..':.L DISTRICT HF.]'.;X r:J->~~ COUNTY D1S',L'J:neT COURT April 12, 2000 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I am writing this letter on behalf of Alan Kalmanoff and to recommend his services to jurisdictions considering efforts to improve their criminal justice system. Mr. Kalmanoffworked with the Hennepin County Criminal Justice System under two separate contracts during 199& and 1999. Under both ofthese contracts, it was his "task to bring together various agencies that make up the criminal justice system and to recommend changes for improvement and better coordination. To make this task more diffiC\llt, he was expected to work in a highly charged political atmosphere in which various entities were much more accustomed to blaming others for system failures and were highly resistant to any form of change. Despite the difficulty of his task and the political atmosphere in which he worked, Mr. Ka.lrnanofT succeeded by any measure. His success is in large part attributable to his unwavering ability to speak frankly aIld candidly, no matter what the politica1 consequeoce, his ,knowl~dge and experience wilh respect to criminal justice systems, and his ability to bring together professionals of diverse backgrounds to concentrate on system improvement. As a resu1t. Mr. Ka1manoffand those he worked with were ab1e to openly exchange information and to overcome the system's initial resistance to change. Despite aU the barriers, 1v1r. Kalmanoffwas dear and accurate in his assessments. candid in his criticisms, and insightful and creative in his recommendations. Mr, Kalmanoffs ability to coordinate these various agencies and to direct and focus their efforts was imp resslve. As a result, 1 wOLlld highly recommend Mr. Ka1manoffand lLPP to any court system or crimtnal justice system contemplating change. The product he provides is honest feedback, in-depth analysis, and weH-considered proposals for change. ..- An-additional service provided by Mr. KalmanClffwasas a "coach" ot..et1:iblet"---- after the initial recommendations were made. . This task was fraught with evengreater-=- danger beçause it took the discussion beyond the academic into the opcrationat~The barriers wer~ considt=rably greater aL l1ús sLage. Nevertheless, Mr. Ka1 man off was once- - ---,--~- -_.~._---- -------- ---- '-' ...,¡ aga.in able to bring together the various groups at the operational level, get. them to commit to a ftank and free discussjon and focus their efforts and discussions upon ways to improve perfonnance. The energy with which he pursued this aspect was considerable. As a result) sjgnificant procedural and substantive changes were accompHshed. On the basis of an of the abov~ I would highly recommend Ala-n Kalmanoff and the ILPP to any agency considering construcùve change. Sincerely, ~/-{t.t~ Daniel B. MabJey . Chief Judge ' DHM:dk - ------. ---.----- "______ _______w·___·__ . _._m___~ _ ________ ._,_.___~__"_. -- - ---~--_.__.- ,-----.----- ----..--.- -- ----- -- - - ------ -------- 2 '-" .....,I Pretrial Services . Alternative Sentencing · Community Corrections April 9, 2003 Alan K.almanoff Institute for Law & Policy Planning P.O. Box 5137 Berkley, CA 94705 Dear Kal, Please find attached articles from the Birmingham News, which speak to the success of your efforts here in Jefferson County. As you will note, the bottom line is we avoided building the new jail and $100,000,000 by improving the efficiency of the criminal justice system. It was achieved through a lot of "little ways" and the fact that we all worked together through the criminal justice management committee. In spite of a crisis in our prison system and the backup of several hundred state inmates in the jail, we have managed to keep the lid on and renovate the facility. Also attached are several graphs which illustrate why. Thanks for your help and ability to set us on the right path here in Jefferson Count . Foster Cook, Director Jefferson County Community Corrections Program 401 Beacon Parkway West Binningham. Alabama 35209-3105 (205) 917-3780 · Fax (205) 917-3721 Sponsored by: UAB . Jefferson County' City of Binningham . Edna McConnell Clark Foundation Alabama Department of Correctioß.5 . Cenler for Substance Abuse Treabnent· National Institute of Justice '-' ....", ~ER/p " ~ 4700 West Midway Road, Fort Pierce, Florida 34981 III ;. . §>qeriff KEN J. MASCARA >- ¡..., .v~ cO Member National Sheriffs' Association Member Florida Sheriffs' Association Telephone: (772) 461-7300 · Fax: (772) 489-5851 MEMORANDUM From: Mr. Douglas Anderson, County Administrator S1. Lucie County F. Patrick Tighe, Director oAf} Department of Detention tf I , S1. Lucie Sheriffs Office ~~ i To: Date: June 29, 2004 Subject: Prisoner Transfer of Inmates to Highlands County On Monday, June 21, 2004, Jason Berger of the State Attorney's Office, Jodi Renc of the Public Defenders Office, Captain Patricia Walsh of the S1. Lucie County Sheriffs Office and myself met to review and discuss several areas related to jail overcrowding. This committee was assigned in order to comply with the requirements of the S1. Lucie County, Board of County Commissioners. We have attached our combined recommendations that may assist in future reductions of the prisoner population. Additionally, we have attached a list of prisoners who are sentenced to the S1. Lucie County jail and meet the criteria required for transport and subsequent housing by the Highlands County Sheriffs Office: a.) County Sentenced Prisoner b.) No Open/Outstanding Charges c.) No Current or Past Violent Behavior d.) No Known Medical Conditions e.) Classified as Minimum Security This list was compiled after an extensive review by members of the S1. Lucie County Sheriffs Office, Department of Detention and Prison Health Services staff. The following contains the areas investigated to ascertain compliance with the above stated criteria: a.) Review of Respective Prisoner Classification Folder b.) Review of Current and Past Criminal Behavior (FCICINCIC) c.) Review of Current and Past Medical History \w -..""I Anderson, Douglas June 29, 2004 Page 2 of2 d.) Review of Local Criminal Data Base (Warrants) e.) Review of Clerk of Courts Data Base (Sentencing Information) As you are aware and as required by Florida State Statute(s) (FS950.01, FS950.02, FS95 1.04) an order from a Circuit Judge in the 19th Judicial District is required to transport these prisoners for confinement in a jail in another county. Please contact me directly upon receipt of that order so that the expeditious, safe and orderly transfer can commence. I can be reached at 772-462-3396 or mobile at 772-370-1595. FPT:kc Attachment: 1. Jail Overcrowding Recommendations 2. Prisoners Cleared for Transport Cc: wi Attachments Board of County Commissioners Dan McIntyre, County Attorney Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator Ken Mascara, Sheriff Garry Wilson, Chief Deputy Toby Long, Finance Director Patricia Walsh, Captain Bruce Colton, State Attorney Jason Berger, Assistant State Attorney Diamond Litty, Public Defender Jodi Renc, Assistant Public Defender File \wi ~VlS:8 '6~'unr ~~pa^!~J~~ To: Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County From: Jason D. Berger, Assistant State Attorney, St. Lucie County Court Supervisor Jodi Rene, Assistant Public Defender Major F. Patriek Tighe, St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office Director of Department of Detention Captain Pat Walsh, 51. Lucie County Sheriffs Office On Operations Cçmµnander, Department of Detention Date: June 23, 2004 Subject: J aï1 Overcrowding On Monday June 21, 2004, Capt. Walsh and Major Tighe of the St. Lucie County Sheriffs Office, Jodi Rene of the Public Defenders Office, ~d Jason Berger of the State Attorneys Office were assigned to review and discuss the jail overcròwding issue in order to meet the requirements of the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County. The issues discussed ere outlined as follows: '. \ 1.) The status and charges ofal11,230 inmates were reviewed on June 21, 2004. The findings and opinions of this meeting are as follows. A 'great IIlajority of all oft.b.e inmates c~ently be'ip:g housed in the St. Lucie County Jail fell into the following categories: a.) Inmates injail on high risk/serious ,Felony charges b,) Inmates injail on violations of probation c.) Inmates injail for failing to appear for court d.) Inmates injail on multiple cases, multiple charges, andJorholds Jodi Rene, Public Defender, is currently assigned to work in the county jail. Jodi reviev¡s jail cases on a daily basis, and Jodi resolves cases with the State on a daily basis. Bottom J1ne is that cases are being ¡-esolved daily, and new cases are cOIIlÌD.g in daily. 2.) Suggestion: Conduct a County Court Jail Docket every Friday: The suggestion has been raised to conduct a County Court Jail Docket every Friday morning (regardless of the alphabet of the defendant, as is done in Martin ·County). A final docket would be set by the clerks office, and would be provided to the State Ari:omeys, Public Defenders and , the St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office Jail.. no later than 3:00 p.m on eve¡)' Tuesday (cases processed afterwards would be placed on the following Friday's Jail Docket.) The State would then forward plea offers by Thursday morning, and the Public Defenders would present the plea offers to their clients prior to the Friday Jail Docket. I 'J (I (I (\ n ' nIl w~nr:~ tnn7 'h7'unr i '-' vWlj:9 '6G 'unr ~ pa^!a:Ja~ 3.) Suggestion: Package Plea Agreements a.) An attempt should be made by all to resolve all of a defendants pending felony cases at the same time with his/her other pending cases (felony and misdemeanor.) b.) An attempt should be made by all to resolve all of a defendants pending misdemeanor cases at the same tþne with ros/her other pendin& misdemeanor cases. The suggestion is to have a standing Administrative Order allowing County Court Case-s to be transferred to Circuit Court foJ.' purposes of resolving package plea agreements. 4.) Suggestion: Plea Agreements at First Appearance CUITently, the St. Lucie County judiciary take turns handling first appearances on a weekly basis. These first appearance hearings occur during various times, depending on which judge is handiing them. The suggestion is to have a 1 :00 PM concrete time in which first appearances are scheduled·and handled (other Circuits have a retired "first appearance" judge handle first appearances in the afternoon.) Th~re are currently aD. average of 15 to 40 first appearances per day. With a finite 1:00 PM schedule for fIrst appearances, both the State Attorney's Office and the Public Defenders Office can schedule for and be "present to attempt to resolve misdemeanor cases (not involving victims.) This suggestion would require the clerks office to fw:nish the SAD with a copy of the arrest affidavit, NCIC/ FCTC and/or drivers license records, so that an informed plea offer can be made (cun:ently the State Attorney's Office does not receive any p~perwork atfirst appearances.) Otherwise, v..ithout any paperwork or information, the State cannot be· prepared to make any plea offers. ' 5.) Baker Acts/Mental Health Patients: Currently there are several mentally ill indiviëiuals being booked into the jail because the mental health receiving! treatment facilities are full, and/or will not admit them. Not only do many of these indi,viduals not belong injail, but they are also taking up space in the jails medioal unit (which more than doubles the daily costs.) The suggestion is to work with law enforcement and the mental health community to improve the mental health process and eIlSUI'ethat individuals who require mental health treatment are properly placed in a mental health facility. 6.) Notices to Appear/Arrests Made by Law Enforcement: Cun-ently the jail has been doing Notices To Appear on those individuals eligible for release upon an-~. The person is arrested, fingerprinted. booked, photographed, and then released On the noti~e to appear. This process has helped the jail overcrowding situation tremendously, while also ensuring that the defendant's arrest is properly documented. 7 '..J C' (' (' Q . n ~I w~n~:~ tnn7 '~7'unr '-' ~Wlj:8 '6l'unr ~l pa^!aJa~ :'.. ... 7.) Suggestion: Upgrade the jails first appearance room to a courtroom setting Currently, the jails fust appearance room has very'poor a~oustics. The suggestion is to upgrade the jails first appearance room. to a courtroom setting with proper acoustics, carpeting, and permanent seating. (See the ñrst appearance rooms .in Alachua, Broward, Dade and Orange Counties.) , 8.) Electronic Monitoring! GPS System 'With or without required day reporting: This suggestion would allow qualified offenders to remain out of jail (pre-trial) on an electronic monitor. The offender would be required to pay for the monitor at a CUITent estimate of 57.00 per day. Offenders could also be required to check in daily with a reporting officer. 9.) Jails reporting requirements: ,. The jail currently provides a monthly list to the Judges and to Court Administration of those individuals held on misdemeanor for greater than 75 days,.and those individual,s held on Felocies for greater then 150 days,' Respectfully Subrnitte4 . ð7-(9-~ Jason D. Berger~ ~s~t State Attorney, St. Lucie 'County Court Supervisor Jodi Rene, Assistant Public Defe~Y'L A~ I- M~jor F. Patrick Tighe !/ ~ ..:::/. ~<.-<Á Director of Department of Detention ~ Cap~Patricìa Walsn 0~.Q~ íUJ~t-- OperatlOns Commander, Department of DetentlOn (' '.J (' I' I' 0 ' n ~I w\/nç"~ i7nn7 'o'unr ~ Identified and Cleared for Transport Banner, Rodney Romone Brown, Larry J. Caldwell, Gabriel A. Collins, Michael Lindell Dannie, Heathcliffe Dowell, Daniel B. Gonzalez, Lazaro Hendrix, Asa Leonardo Hernandez, Heriberto Hill, Lawrence John Jones, Douglas Glen McGee, Richard McKinley, Alex McLean, David Jr. Melchor, Solomon· Monds, James Anthony Owens, Ed Chesely Owens, Robert Earl Pierce, George Edgar Saucedo, Jamie E. Settle, Jacob Adam Srouji, Azmi Stotler, Earl Denver Sturry, Lorenzo Dawine Tatro, Herman Albert Thompson, Hank L. Thompson, John Howard 08/26/04 03/29/05 11/17/04 10/18/04 10/19/04 08/12/04 09/27/04 08/19/04 01/05/05 02/17/05 09/15/04 03/19/05 04/03/05 08/21/04 01/11/05 09/08/04 02/04/05 09/18/04 09/26/04 09/14/04 08/29/04 09/25/04 10/24/04 10/18/04 09/26/04 10/28/04 09/14/04 - ...,¡ .........-""........... ...."- .....................b-......· 'J"'J.,",,"V" 'w'.."J '-' yage 1 or ü 'wi tt"Jj'{t[~~Il;l...ENQUIRER I POST I WCPO I CIN WEEKLY I Classifleds I Cars I Homes I Jobs I ClIstOntE TIm ENQUßŒR î~',-·I.I!"'-dF. F:Jnt1T~ fJr;i- n.u; H:,-l!Uþ·"::.....- .:·1 ....!..T!.ì""~:..\PI!-H HOME ·,:r:~ì"'" ,:.(. '., ~ <[i ~,'~ I~!, ~'íI;..J~.').'\~,\JI ,.-' ,,~1'\'~ ~\'!~:I '. , ' .-. . F;'__,'i~ F'.3~j~ ... LOC3f '"'''-;5 Sport5 Slì:';~in;:"~s Editor¡a!$ Tempo HCIr!',: Styk Tr"vL'f ¡-¡",l!th T2ci1nú;aqy V-.Jè,¡,{!it......l Bar.:k Issues S",,'rcì, Subscribe $po¡~n' ;S \:10.::....11 :., ¡.l'~ ':. H~qh SC:1ÜG! ¡:"~ect:; X~h':~~'J \..I~':tl'JP{'qÌ'.iT" Ji!n BOlgIH~1!"1 C'..ì!uinn;sts f~ë;H_h'jS' \,'-:.",,:- t-:blTE¡~T .~. :;..~ '.J~:' ;·~·ì LlII ;t!~ ~ Horoscop'"$ L\.H!_\>lj t<:i; ;.::;;._.. ~_....,ì,_..1i I~: \: ¡ j It ';> Vidt:o Garnt:'s c !r,jC::"'J1\ ~\T¡ CC;';' Gr.¡e~fIr~.·J.,!~ ;'.;-il.ip~.-;_:ïfT..~:":t; .Ji;::; Sf-rid an ~>P,)~;.t!_.;)r.-I COUpY'!S Visitûr's Guid0 CL'::;'SS¡¡:,c(:::> ...-,.'1_';"0 (; i.1:" ::; Homo's Obitu"niC'5 Gen~;¡¡1 PI;¡ce ~1f1 ¿¡d ~~t¥our finandal. II <ÍÌ1r~Il\...ùC'""~-- '7 '''''.''If Partner For Llfe ''',,-/~1.~~~ F q ':t~¡""" ,MtlIttg rdatiøttshj~ ørd ~t!tJ tM /fnøMfø{ "Mis of 04ir ~ sincl!' 1936. tìui ~\ Monitor no stranger to controversy t'dÙlh..l....i.y, :>t¡;V\h:"nltJi:f iJ. :.d.h..2 M~~! .;;",;":,,..~...~--- .. Updated E ~TOP HEADLINE NE\ Kalmanoff left some customers unsati " JÝ' g;;:'.'~;;;l'"'" " By Robert Anglen J ¿¡ r ¡f~"i~~nL'<>L,nt~ ï The Cincinnati Enquirer . Õ. ~~erJ -A)'o~~'" <" '(" ~ I ç, . " "'-" ''''f'P H, In cities more than 1,000 miles apart, officia (I vN,,:,:::::, of ;,,,j,,,,,.,, :h~~:i:::~e~~ ~e,,::os;me angry words ,,1 ~¡:,!p,~tfJt, ,e" ';''',-'1.:, ,'1 r J ;t1kgrt~'.li Lh.,c., They say the Berkeley, Calif.,lawyer appointed f\ r~~I;~f!r,;~'''';¡-,' 8..",.,;;, to oversee reforms in Cincinnatj's police V r, . "C ',. ,", Kalmanoff department created political and financial " . controversies to mask his inability to deliver . . , .'~ contracts. ~..: ' . .,:. \; ic !.' . .:,~ :-,,- ;r.: t=· .' -. A former Summit County, Ohio, attomey: "He failed to deliver what he was hired to do. He created a smokescreen so he didn't have to perform." . :==:-Je:t::r fi;'!Ü\'':'~ inl.; 'i', Q'J,:rrtt=-{fn~lf_: A Hillsborough County, Fla., official: "He found out he wasn't going to be making any money on the contract so he did everything he could do to get out of it ... like a smoke screen." ¡ O(¡¿,y S Top Jobs i· -ditÓh:;¡~' 4IÞJlftIJ!I(1¡:¡g Dr. Kalmanoff has been praised time and again as a tireless ~ ~~~;~~~r~~~~~t~::~:~~~~ ~~7e~ ~a~í~f:~i~~:~~e~d I ~~ i~~~~';~~~~:;: investigations have led to significant government reforms and ~ have saved taxpayers milHons. ( 0\ ~1f:P€'tÿ 8;0;' '\J \ t' ,\¡f_ont:LJen¡¡c¡, But among the hundreds of counties and cities where Dr. :J ~ HOiHti Ma¡¡;.;g'i" Kalmanoff has been hired to streamline prison systems, . j \I /jf: C3ce >-'0111< conduct audits and head corruption probes, several agencies ~ 0 .' .--- report problems that aren't mentioned in his resume: Fights v,~ Z~~~~\J7:;~~:" over bills, political firestorms, unfulfilled duties, exaggerated t ~ .". '.'" ,,___: results, 6 I ~ Q'< P",,,""",f¡ '...i{,., Those are some of the same reasons why Cincinnati's mayor 1.J) V r./ Æ.rnt.3S~':~::s and City Council say they want to oust Dr. Kalmanoff only (\)~\ A,-¿; ."",. three weeks after he was tapped by a federal judge to 7 q;. . monitor two historic legal settlements the city made in April to ~\\ \!1 ~ . C Serl/lce . .ty r. Iff' Installers Improve commUnt -POlice re a Ions. , A,:rs~ar Hó'"mng Cool in' ~I Incensed over a $55,000 bill from Dr. Kalmanoff -Including ') ! ~',I7-::-' r-:="" \\:'7:5'l ' \ _:\, ;--. i : JUN 2 9 ZûU4 !~.. .. \ _ 6;;!/?4 I 1""1' t, I"'~~m'l. OFfivs http://www.enquirer.comleditions/2002/1 1/1 l/loc _ kalmanoffI l,html -- - - --0-- HELP Feedback Subscribe Search Newsroom Directory Cincinnati Bengals ticket Free FedEx, Great Prices, SeIec:tion Call 800.660,6031 or Book Online wv^y.eSeBt~.l"·(.jrn B~ml~i.I!.çkf$ Available Here b- AR Games from get- ins to the 50 Yerd Line. \'I\,,^~. ~!:iedatj(;ket _ CÚr'n Çlo..ÇLruwi.. ohio Y~t!QO Read user IeWMs and Iind deals b' your trip to Cinci'InBti, Oho '.'l.'Ni, trÎp::Etv'¡S()l (Ì'Jrn Gll)çinOª11 Beo-9a_l$ Tick~t Popular site for Bengals Tickets Order Online or caD 888-633-ô657 \'j"¡¡Ù, G:::f\yt.¡b··b .c~;.rp In 1996, Dr. Kalmanoff bailed out of a $53,000 contract for a perfonnanœ audit of the Hillsborough City-County Planning Commission, an agency that oversees development issues in ¡ _Jp ~ the Tampa area. ./J } vv '11" , b /¡YJ fÝp J ¿~ bet- vJ ¡/) /þ'V ¿11A~ /~/ '1:. ' þ//l) J S~IJ~ A' ~-- c~/~ '-----. -.....J ~ charges for packing and preparing for travel, an interview with an Enquirer reporter and attending a banquet - city officials vowed not to pay him and are demancing U.S. District Court judge Susan Dlotl replace him. Dr. Kalmanoff did not respond to repeated calls this week or to e-mails about the criticisms he has faced in other cities. But this isn't the first time a government agency has refused to pay his bill. 'He wasn't doing his job' In a letter to commissioners, Dr. KaJmanoff said he wasn't given the autonomy to do a proper job. Planning commissioners said Dr. Kalmanoff quit because he severely underbid the job. "He wanted to make a whole damn bunch of money and he didn't want to do anything for it," former planning commissioner Ed Dees says. "I was on his side until I found out he wasn't doing his job." Although it happened six years ago, Mr. Dees is still rankled. "It was either his way or the highway,· Mr. Dees says. 'ry ou ought to get rid of him. If this guy does what he did with us, you're not going to have a good experience." When Dr. Kalmanoff resigned, he left the planning commission with an $11,364 bill that included $2,200 in travel expenses and $5,100 for conducting six interviews. The commission voted unanimously not to pay. Barbara Leiby, administrative seMœs manager for the commission, says conflicts arose soon after Dr. Kalmanoff was given three boxes of documents to review prior to the audit. ïhere were specific things we wanted him to do," she says. "He found them so objectionable that he himself became personally objectionable." Ms. Leiby says Dr. Kalmanoffwas chosen in part because of the high regard officials in Tampa and Hitlsborough County had for his study of the police and sheñff's departments in 1994. But she says her agency found him to be intractable - and she beHaves much of that was aimed at getting out of the contract. http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2002/11/11l1oc_kalmanoff11.html !'age L ot b "WI ManagersJexe- Cornpany CG,>¡í Search by keyv I . Post your job~ 6/28/04 · H-L~U~L,.11 JlV "U<U'ð'-'~~"''''UVVC1~)' ...." "Our understanding of the contract was different than his understanding," she says. In California's San Joaquin County, officials also had a dispute with Dr. Kalmanoff over money. This time, the issue had nothing to do with bills, but with Dr. Kalmanoft"s alleged claims that he saved taxpayers $10 mi16on. Hired in 1995 to review the justice system In the central- valley county, Dr. Kalmanoff promised to save the county millions of dollars. But those savings never materialized, and three years later officials said they would stop providing Dr. Kalmanoff with a reference because he continued telling clients that he had saved the county $10 million. Deputy County Administrator Stephanie Larsen confirms the dispute. She says Dr. Kalmanoff made the point that the county not only saved money but avoided costs as a result of his $125,000 study. "They did implement a number of his recommendations," Ms. Larsen says, "He made about 90 recommendations." Although former County Administrator David Baker told reporters in 1998 that he would no longer provide Dr. Kalmanoffwith a reference, Dr. Kalmanoff listed Mr. Baker on his applicationJor Cincinnati monitor. There is no mention of money. "Evaluated the entire county criminal justice system resulting in the development of an action plan to improve overall system performance and efficiency," the application states. An extensive oversight resume Dr. Kalmanoff, who prefers to be caRed "Kal," heads the nonprofit Institute for Law and Policy Planning, in Berkeley, Calif. It was founded in 1973. His background includes extensive work as a consultant to police departments in San Jose, Salt Lake City, Orlando and MinneapoUs. He also was appointed to make sure California state prisons complied with a federal settlement that required improvements in prison conditions, In Cincinnati, his job is to enforce deadlines In two landmark settlements that ended a federal civil rights investigation of the police department and suspended a lawsuit by a group of African-American activists who accused poßce of discrimination. The monitor will oversee the police department's overhaul of training, use-of-farce poUcies and citizen complaint procedures, and wiU review efforts by community groups to http://www.enquirer.comIeditions/2002/11/11/loc_kalmanoff11.html Page:'; 01'6 6/28/04 ~..&.""........",....,... ......"" u................z:::,..... . ""''''''....I......'''''........o.JJ \w ...., improve community-police relations. Judge Dlotl appointed Dr. Kalmanoff on Oct. 10 after becoming convinced the parties involved in the settlements - the city, the police union, the Department of Justice and the Black United Front activist group - couki not agree on one of 11 candidates for the job. The judge has declined to comment on Dr. Kalmanoff since appointing him. Dr. Kalmanoffs team of 19 legal and poRce experts will be joined next year by retiring Ohio Supreme Court Justice Andrew Douglas. Under terms of the two agreements, the city is responsible for paying the monitor costs. Dr. Kalmanoff previously has told the Enquirer that the bill could be $7 million over the next five years, though City Council says the tab must be capped at $1 million per year. But last week, city officials threatened to pull out of the agreements because of Dr. Kalmanoffs unwillingness to answer questions about his job and because of the $55,000 bill. It's for creating that kind of political firestorm that Dr. Katmanoffis remembered in Akron's Summit County. A controversial report "I think a lot of people didn't want to hear the truth," says Summit County Assistant Sheriff Larry Givens. "\ have a lot of respect for his willingness to say what is on his mind." Mr. Givens was a Summit County Council member when Dr. Kalmanoff was hired in 2000 to review the county's justice system. "It was a sound report and I think people got their money's worth," he says. "I think a lot of people may have perceived it as something to be politicized, when it shouldn't have been," But Jim Lawrence, founder and president of Oriana House, which provides alternative sentencing for the county, says Dr. Kalmanoff used the report tike a poUtical mallet. "Dr. Kalmanoff has one way to do things. And if you don't do it, then he will find ways to paint you in a negative light," Mr. Lawrence says. "I saw (the report) as a veiled threat. No question about it." The $195,000 report said county officials had allowed Oriana House to become a monopoly. http://www.enquirer.com/editions/2002/11/11/loc_kalmanoff11.html -L aõ,", ..,. VL V 6/28/04 '-' ....,¡ But Mr. Lawrence says the report was full of half-truths and rumors. He accuses Dr. Kalmanoff of using the report to demand a letter of recommendation. He says Dr. Kalmanoff told him if he refused, the report would blast Oriana House. "I have demanded a retraction from Dr. Kalmanoff for what I believe are factual errors," Mr. Lawrence says. Linda Parnnell, one-time general counsel to former Summit County Executive Tim Davis, says the report was out of line. "Kalmanoff failed to deliver what he was hired to do," she says. "I think Oriana House became a political casualty." She says Dr. Kalmanoff - who once asked for a police escort when he came to speak to the county council-overstepped his bounds and helped fan the flames of a political fire in order to avoid delivering a complete report. She calls it a smoke screen. "The report was a whole spiral of what could happen. A lot of it was speculative," MS.PamneU says. Mr. Givens disagrees. He says the report pointed to needed changes.- "Overall, the report stated, let's get on with it," he said. "It said we can do a better job." Kal won't back down When you hire Dr. Kalmanoff, you have to be prepared for the message, says Robert Houtman, former county chair in Kalamazoo, Mich. . "If he didn't make people upset, he wouldn't be doinQ his job," he says. In 2000, Kalamazoo County hired Dr. Kalmanofffor an estimated $300,000 report on improving the justice system. But this year, when officials were tl)'ing to use his 300-page report to justify a bond issue for a new jail, Dr. Kalmanoff came back at the request of an anti-tax group. He criticized the county's justice system and chastised officials for making no effort to implement his plan. 'They tried to twist (the report) around and use it as an advocate," says Mr. Houtman, who now lives in Florida. "Kalmanoff caught them with their pants down." .l- But other Kalamazoo officials say Dr. Kalmanoff went too far and lost his objectivity. They say he attacked them personally http://www.enquirer.comJeditions/2002/11/11/locJca1manoff11.html 6/28/04 .A. -ö- - 'J.L V ~ ..." when they disagreed with him. Mr. Hautman says Kalamazoo needed Dr. Kalmanoff. "He isn't afraid to take anybody on." E-mail mngl~r}@l;}nqY¡r~r.çºm TOP HEADUNES M9!lj!Qt!lCL~tra!J--9-~rJº_ç9nl(QYef'$Y l1f:(Q.~~_º_N~J:~ªmjJ-2Jº__nr-'L!o~ m_9JÜ.tor: Rape victim lobbies for tougher laws RamLº-ehind ~ronoftCenter Officer jailedJIl baby _de~b Iw.Q ...Jimª, .$.~rv.jy.oJWª()t$.tº,J~tl,Jrn Veterans._Dªy ()Þ$erYª_nç~~ Veterans Day closin9s TRISTATE Stor.ms~i!1 Tin CWi9-1 Ti::I'J11, Tri~t~J~L~!M,!J~ep_ Qr:1 CINCINNATI - HAMILTON COUNTY InI1Q(;_e_nç~_ Prºle~t~!I'!~l.)çJ~~ Busing cuts could hurt Mt. Heatthy review lYIarkerJo hO!lQLmuseun~LblstQ!'Y PQJj~~l1º~_~~!1 ~.~ :-prg,!,!~ Jç~.YJº__$ilj~ty G()()c;I News: Y wmhelp a~ults~c;I with grant TeenJyt9J ~1ªte~Jº-~ll¡ktfe!l You Asked Forlt Obituary: Harold 'Hal' Bryant was XU professor BUTlER COUNTY ßelov~" re~_ide!}tg~~J'!~ WARREN COUNlY 1,.E!I:>é1nQn_lº_wn_mee~in-9 Lebanon students test required exam OHIO The Police. The Clash to join rock hall Qf fame AtJ1let~wb~LØ~c;I b~ .~~t j,o~"'r..~mmat~p~Y$ OV'JhaYL!~f..ºnUf!tLçbª"~r~ç_h_~_~$u~Q~tumin!l KENTUCKY Ky. checking game .animals Search our site by keyword: I ~ Eftq«irer· Pesf· 9WCPO · CiN Weøtiy CINCINNATI COM I ENQUIRER s..ch also: News I Jobs I Homes I Cars I Classifleds I Obits I Coupons I Events I Dinin" MQ!!Î~~,ºV.O~ I Yi~Q ~r!1n I HP.I~~ I GilIf I fui!~ÚGYk.t~ I MaoslDirectigJl'¡ I 'L~HmvP¡ POST I WCPO I CIN VVEEKL Y I Classifieds I Cars I Homes I Jobs I Custo! C.(~~~Th '("I.~(..t:n~.._It":1t~ Ilq~I."!~~ ~'r'''': t tett~'~~ tn t~::! ~~,tf.:'''~ 15.·~·:~·'~~! N,>wspaper <!dvHt'SII'9 t W"'!! ¡¡,I"Portlslng I Place !I Cl;¡ss,fi~c! I ('I,:ul,nor¡ ~ºRVright 1995-2004. Th~. Cincì!1lJati Enqu.iJ!~r, a Gannett Cc>. Inc. newspaper. Use of this site signifies agreement to ~of ~Lvice updabd 12/19/2002. http://www.enquirer.comleditionsl2002l11l11I1ocJcalmanoffll.html 6/28/04 ~C'!~~; _~U~ ~~.~o '-" ,t.l',) -'",.1.. '':':H:'j 1'1'::,:::,--':)'_,1", BRO:'\SON: Team up to fire the monitor f"'A(;il:. lU ...",., Page 1 tií(!l1¡~lff'fl~ENQUlRER I POST I WCPO I GIN WEEKLY I Classifìeds I Cars I Homes I Jobs I CU$t THE, ENQUIRER tI'\t.IM"' EiD!'T1'fJN or- 'rHIíi' Hí:r;]Q'\;'~ï ,t1 ~11¡¡n'!J P,¡'Pl:l~ HOME NEWS ENTERTAINMENT SPORTS FU;DS 8ENGALS LOCAL GUIDE MULTlMt.D1A ARCHI TO DAY'S ENQUIRER Fronl Page ~ Loe..1 Nnrs Sports BusiMSS Editorials Tempo Home Style Trav&1 Health Technology Weath~r lS;tck 1s$\lt$ Search Subscribe $PO~T5 Bcarcats Bcnl;als High School Reds Xavl.r VIEWPOINTS Jim Borgman COlumnists Rp:lders' views ENT!;RTAINMENT Movies DInIng Horoscopes Lottery Resull$ Local Event!> Video GamCls CINCINNATI,COM Gil/e.ways MilpsiOireetlona SefId an E -Postcard CQUp0n,$ Vi~¡tor's Guide CL.ASSIFIEDS Mgnday, Novel'l~bor 11. 2002 Team up to fire the monitor Anyone who reads Superman comics knows that being Invaded by Mel'$ can be B good thing if it gets all the Earthlings to quit killing each other and joIn forces to flght thß alien invader. So thank you, Alan Kalmanoff, for being Peter Cincinnatí's favorite Martian. Mr. I<almi!lnoff Bronson comes from BerKeley, Calif. - which is as far from Cincinna!i as Mars. His bill proves he'$ living en another planet. And after only a month as the "monitor" of our . police and race problems. he has everyone in CincirInati $0 mad. we might join forces - t,:) dump the monitor. Mad as heck City Council was insulted by the way he brushed off questions. Then he billed for $55,000, including charges for packing his suitcase, answering e-mail and going to dinners. "The days that we will be pushed over are Oller, n said John Crenley. Pat OeWine and ott'!ers threatened to blow up the "historic" collaborative agreement if Mr. Kalmanoff is not dLrnped. They all voted to fire him. One problem. They signed away the! power to federal judge Susan Dlott. who picked h'm. And Mr. DeWine discovered on Friday that Mr. Kalmenoff was one of the finalists sent to Judge Dlott . by the city. "tt's embarrassing," he said, "but I still think it is in everyone's best În~er8st to remove him." bttp:/¡vlw·w.enquirer.comleditions/2002/11/11/1oc_Bronsonl1.html .... Updated AP TOP HEADUNE N · U.S. Hands power t Days E:arlY. - · E"~my Combatant, U.S. Courts · NATO Agrlllts 10 Ho ~ · Miliiai'lts Thretlten t· Hostagü · MInn. Airport Tests Background C1Ieçk · ConSl,.lrner S~ndin ....ear Hlg" · "Fahrenhol¡ 9/11' Se Record · Ul'coln Park Zoo I-. Rev!lli!! · §J!æIj$e l"JtI POVñ, ~ · Fedérer Moves \"to QualÛrfJn31S 06/28/200402:02:27 PM UU'~UiLUV~ ~,.~U '-' -'t..".....Ju~ t U.JU l"t~~-~I.JH ...,J BRONSON: Team up to fire the monitor Jobs ~1'1 H~ Obítuzrlcs G~n*ral Plac.e iIIn id HELP Feec:lb:lck SubscribQ Search Newsroðm mreetory Another problem: The city is also at the mercy of the other collaborators - the F~ternal Order of Police. the Slack United Front, the ACLU and the Department of Justice. '" was surprised she picked ihis guy, ø said Roger Webster of the FOP. "He was not on our list. The way she explained it, hs wa$n't at the top of anyone's list, but she felt he wa$ the best for the job." Ken Lawson, spokesman for BUF, said Mr. Kalmanoff was not on their list, either. "Some of the things on that bill were just stupid." he said. "He wasn't our choice, but you have a process to follow." Nobody called There·s the chapped spot. Mr. Webster and Mr. Lawson were never consulted about firing the monitor. "It Irritates me that the city has not even contacted us," said Mr. Webster. Mr. LaWson said. 'What I was angry at is that the city doesn~ understand they don't run it. If eV$rybody called and telked with each other and we all say 'Hey, this bill is crazy,' that's different "' can guarantee you they can't tell this guy to stop working." But V\--aJt - this i$ good news. Who could have gUe$sed that Mr. Kalmancff could unite council - and even get the FOP end 1he aUF to sSJ'69. Judge Dlott i$n't talking. But if she sticks the city with Mr. Kalmanoff, the "historic" deal is probably doomed. The solution is comic-book obvious: City otrlcials should meet with the colleborators and ask tnem - politely - to lOin forces and tell the judge she reached too far into the apple barrel and pulled out a lemon. Oops: lest Friday I reported that Detroit had 42 homicides last year. That is the adjusted rate of homicides per 100,000 residents. The actual number i$ close to 400, according to Detroit media. E-mail Obronson@enquirer,com or call 768-8301. TOP HEADLINES Monitor no str¡¡naer to controversy http://www.enquirer.comJeditionil2002l11/11/1oc_Bronsonl1.htlnl ....1-\\:11:. !:J<'¡ Page 2 06/28/200402:02:27 PM · '- AGENDA REOUEST ...",; ITEM NO.SC~ DATE: July 22, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITIED BY: St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office William R. Simon Grant Programs Administrator SUBJECT: Permission to Advertise - request for permission advertise a public hearing as required by U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Program, 2004 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant. BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office, as required by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, request permission to advertise for a public hearing regarding the proposed use of funds for our 2004 Local Law Enforcement Block Grant. The grant award will be used to purchase new and upgraded computer network hardware and software under the grant Program Purpose Area" Supporting Law Enforcement - Procuring equipment, technology, and other material directly related to basic law enforcement functions." The grant award is for $28, 804 with a required minimum cash match of $3,200. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Matching Funds will come from the Local Law Enforcement Trust Fund PREVIOUS ACTION: Commission approved the Sheriff's Office submission of the grant on July 13, 2004. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Sheriff's Office request to advertise for a public hearing regarding the proposed use of funds prior the obligation of funds as required by the granting agency. COMMISSION ACTION: [ ] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CONCURRENCE: Douglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: MAnagement & Rudg~t F'urch;-;¡sinçJ; Orif.3¡naf )f'!(J IJf-"pt. Othpf': Other: Finance: (Check for COpy only, if doolicable) Eft. 5/96 '- u.s. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Bureau o/Justice Assistance ..",¡ ------_.~~--~- FY 2001 Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Program F or fiscal year (FY) 200 I, Congress has appropriated $523 million for the continuation of the Local Law En- forcement Block Grants (LLEBG) Program, to be ad- ministered by the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA), U.S. Department of Justice. The purpose of the LLEBG Program is to provide funds to units oflocal govern- ment to underwrite projects to reduce crime and im- prove public safety. Program Eligibility and Distribution of Funds To be considered eligible for the LLEBG Program, a jurisdiction must be a general purpose unit of local gov- ernment.1 The unit of local government must report, via its law enforcement agencies, to the Uniform Crime Re- ports (UCR) Program of the Federal Bureau ofInvesti- gation (FBI). The LLEBG Program is a formula program based on a jurisdiction's number ofUCR Part I violent crimes re- ported to the FBI. The formula is computed in two stages. In the first stage, state allocations are proportionate to each state's average annual amount ofUCR Part I violent crimes compared with that for an other states for the 3 most recent calendar years of data from the FBI. Each state, however, must receive a minÍmmn award of 0.25 per- cent of the total amount available for formula distribution under the LLEBG Program. In the second stage, local awards are proportionate to each local jurisdiction's aver- age annual amount ofUCR Part I violent crimes compared with that for an other local jurisdictions in the state for the 3 most recent calendar years. Jurisdictions reporting crime rates above the formula-based threshold of $10,000 are eligible for direct awards. The difference remaining between the state allocation and the local allocation total is awarded to a state ad- ministrative agency (SAA) designated by the Governor. The SAA has the option of distributing award funds to state police departments or units oflocal government not meeting the formula-based threshold of $10,000. Additional information about this portion of the funds is available from each state's respective SAA. Program Purpose Areas LLEBG Program funds must be spent in accordance with one or more of the following seven purpose areas: o Supporting law enforcement: · Hiring, training, and employing on a continuing basis new, additional law enforcement officers and necessary support personne1. · Paying overtime to currently employed law enforcement officers and necessary support personnel to increase the number of hours worked by such personne1. · Procuring equipment, technology, and other material directly related to basic law enforce- ment functions. o Enhancing security measures in and around schools and in and around other facilities or locations that the unit of local government considers special risks for incidents of crime. o Establishing or supporting drug courts. o Enhancing the adjudication of cases involving violent offenders, including cases involving violent juvenile offenders. '- ....I o Establishing a multijurisdictional task force, particularly in rural areas, composed ofIaw en- forcement officials representing units of local government. This task force must work with federal law enforcement officials to prevent and control cnme. o Establishing crime prevention programs involving cooperation between community residents and law enforcement personnel to control, detect, or investi- gate crime or to prosecute criminals. o Defraying the cost of indemnification insurance for law enforcement officers. Program Requirements The following requirements must be met prior to the obligation of LLEBG Program funds and prior to the Request for Drawdown (RFD) of funds. The RFD must be completed within 90 days of the posting of awards, or the funds will be redistributed in the following fiscal year. o Advisory Board Each jurisdiction must establish or designate an advisory board to review the application. The board must be designated to make nonbinding recommendations for the proposed use of funds received under this program. The advisory board must include a member from each of the following local organizations: law enforcement agency, prosecutor's office, court system, school system, and a nonprofit group (e.g., educational, religious, community) active in crime prevention or drug-use prevention or treatment. o Public Hearing Each jurisdiction must hold at least one public hearing regarding the proposed use of funds prior to the obligation of funds. Jurisdictions should encour- age public attendance and participation. o Matching Funds In each jurisdiction, LLEBG funds may not exceed 90 percent of total program costs. Program partici- pation requires a cash match that will not be waived. All recipients must maintain records clearly showing the source, amount, and timing of all matching contributions. o Trust Fund Each jurisdiction must establish a trust fund that may accrue interest in which to deposit program funds, o Expenditure Period All federal funds, including interest, revenue, divi- dend, and match, must be spent within the 2-year expenditure period. Unspent fimds must be returned to BJA within 90 days of program termination. o Public Safety Officers' Health Benefits Provision Section 6 I 5 of the FY 1998 Appropriations Act requires a unit ofIocal government to afford a public safety officer who retires or is separated from duty due to a personal line-o¡'duty injury, suffered as a direct and proximate result of re- sponding to a hot pursuit or an emergency situa- tion, health benefits at the time of separation that are the same as or better than those he or she received while on duty. To be eligible to receive the entire amount of award under the LLEBG Program, a unit ofIocal govern- ment must be in compliance with this provision, If not in compliance, the unit will forfeit 10 percent of the eligible amount. Further infonnation about this provision is provided on the LLEBG Internet-based application system, which may be accessed at www.ojp.usdoj.gov/BJAlhtml/Ilebgl.htm. Prohibition on Use of Funds LLEBG funds are not to be used to purchase, lease, rent, or acquire tanks or annored vehicles, fixed-wing aircraft, limousines, real estate, yachts, or any vehicle not used primarily for law enforcement. Nor are funds to be used to retain individual consultants or construct new facilities, Likewise, federal funds are not to be used to supplant state or local funds. Rather, they are to be used to increase the amount of funds that would oth- erwise be available from state and local sources. Resolution of Funding Disparities The LLEBG Program provides resolution to potential funding disparities within jurisdictions. A state attorney general may certifY that a disparity exists between or among jurisdictions. Those jurisdictions are then re- quired by statute to develop and submit joint applica- tions. BJNs role is limited to accepting state attorney general certifications and reviewing jointly submitted applications. If the state attorney general chooses not to become involved in the disparate allocation certification process, there is no mechanism for BJA to intervene. All certifications must be submitted within given dead- lines, prior to BJA determination of annual award amounts. 2 Local Law t:.ßIorcemem tllOCK LJrams - LLJ:.tlLJ IntroaUCtIon AwajQ Grant Handbook Q_\iTVie,-v mIN~1'J,Jl]lber Ç¡::QlnlQ¡:mation PJiJgflID1 C<mJ!!çl InfgJlnatioJl Ç~rtifi9ations ¡\warò _3)lQMaLe]¡ St¡blr¡Î.t A pn!i.catiqp ))<'l,];1)e Lungs Hçì]".I'je_ilL1cmt"1\ sled (2_uç'_s ti ())J~ LLEBG Home l¿Jg:PíT Page 1 ot 1 ~ -..J RFQ Grª[1LÇh_ªng~§ FinatGlflJ1ÌB-ªºº--rt Correspondence Award and Match The following is the summary information for the total amount of LLEBG funds for which you are applying: Eligible Award Amount Your jurisdiction's Eligible Award Amount, not including PSOHB compliance status, is reflected in this figure $28,804 Final Award Amount The Final Award Amount shown below includes the adjustments to your eligible award amount due to the PSOHB compliance status of your jurisdiction, $28,804 Match Amount The LLEBG Program requires a 10 percent cash match, calculated as one-ninth of the Final Award Amount, with no waiver provision (except for American Samoa, Guam, Northern Mariana Islands, and U.S, Virgin Islands), Federal funds may not exceed 90 percent of total program costs. Your match amount has been automatically calculated based on the Final Award Amount Program incomelinterest earned on federal funds may not be considered as part of a grantee's local match, $3,200 Save and Continue https://grants.ojp,usdoj.govll1ebgs/lllebg2000.llebg32k.gen _award _ amount_ scr?p _ bgid=6 6/28/2004 Local Law l::nrorcemem tllOCK urams - LLl::tlu ImroauCtIon 6,!"E)rd Grant Handbook º~Jyi~\y J)UN~Numbe! CEO Information p_!Qgranll,:Qutaet lníòm1ation Certi¡ÌSgtiOIlS AY',iard and Match Submit!\' ppl1 cation Dcc'lineJj,¡nds licJrrS(:9.11"11JJy¡~skc:º Que:~tions LLEBG Home L9~OtT page 1 or I '-' 'WI RFD fSwitChto ... .:1 <31?DL<::t!ª-ngê§ fiD5~i §JªnL~,ªº9Jt Correspondence } ._\~ {}f I13 ~pç}(:__R~,'i_~~~ ;SAj\J~e\¡e:i\ The LLEBG Trust Fund Requirement All direct LLEBG recipients and State subrecipients must establish a trust fund in which to deposit LLEBG Program funding, The trust fund mayor may not be an interest bearing account. Regardless of the type of account selected, the trust fund must protect the principal. The trust fund must be established by the the recipient jurisdiction, not by the implementing agencylies, For example, in the case of a city award, the city manager or mayor's office must establish the trust fund, not the police department. In some jurisdictions, the term "Special Revenue Fund" may denote the same attributes as the definition for trust fund under the LLEBG Program. An LLEBG recipient's trust fund must include the following features: I, The fund may earn interest, but any earned interest must be used for program purposes. The trust fund does not have to be an interest bearing fund, L The recipient must be able to account for the Federal award amount, 3, The recipient must be able to account for the local match amount, 4, The recipient must be able to account for any interest earned, 5, The recipient must be able to account for all LLEBG Program funds (federal, local match and any program incomelinterest earned/on federal funds) by individual grant yeaL 6, All program income including interest earned on federal funds should be expended as it is accrued, P' I have read the above requirement. Save and Continue Go Back https://grants.ojp.usdoj -gov/llebgs//llebg2000.11ebg_ main ,certifications _trust_ fund?p _ bgid... 6/28/2004 Local Law 1:'-ntorcement !:SIOCK Lrrants - LLE1Ri introductIOn @ Avyard Grant Handbook c.~vš:njg~ PlJN~ Nunltcr CEO Informª-!iQI1 Er()f!@I)LÇ'OJlta<.:t ID10JJlli1JÙ211 Ç('rti1Ì('¡;nO!lS AlVªæËflsLMatcl1 I)çÇ.l¡LL~_r-_~jn0, s IklpŒr"qtlCJ1Î 0Io,,,tC(j QucstlOns L,LEBG Homc L,Qg:Off Page 1 of 1 \.f 'WI RFJ;l SwitChto .:. :3 GrªntçÌ1ªnges Finaic;rant REJRQIT CorresP<LI"L~nG~ Program Contact Information The Program Contact person is the individual officially designated by the CEO to serve as the day-to-day contact on all program related matters, including completing this application, and responding to all program related questions from BJA As the officially designated Program Contact, this individual has the ability to bind the jurisdiction to all terms and conditions related to this grant Only public officials have the ability to bind the jurisdiction legally to the terms of the LLEBG Program, A CEO may not delegate this responsibility to a non-public official or a public official outside his/her jurisdiction. A jurisdiction may use whatever assistance it deems appropriate to gather needed information for the completion of the LLEBG on-line application and payment acceptance processes; however, it may deleQate only to a public official within the applicant iurisdiction the responsibility for actually completing the on-line processes. Any applying jurisdiction violating these requirements will be subject to formal action, including nullification of the FY 2004 LLEBG application as well as eligibility for the future LLEBG funding cycles, Sf !_U;~~¡f:' ,- haE 2": :Contact infonìi3tc~ update this info[iT1atfcn fc¡'- aH !~i»_E BC~ Title Budget Analyst . Prefix IMrs. .:J ,------_._-,._.~._.._.- ---_._-._-_.~~.,'-- .'.- - ----.--~. -----. First Name ¡IMaria ~:~~~.~~~~-J~~~~~~!_c-=.._.~.._.. . ~~d~essI2300 Virginia Ave. - '---'-'-.---.---.- . -..- -..-...-..-. Address Une2 _. ',.,,__u. _~ _ _.__.~c~_.___ _".. .,' __.___~_,__..._.__. ..__,_,,~.____<.~__~____ ".__ ~._..____ ___ .u,....___ .____.__ City !IFort Pierce· State Florida - -_._'..----_._--~~-_.. Zip COdef34982 -15652 Need.i1eip fo ZiP+4') ---,.-,--,"--"-".,'-'-- -.._-- ..----...._._..__.___..__...._ __. n.,___.._.___._., .561- f462 -11723 -. _..__._---~-~~~----_. Extension 561 - f462 -12117 .. - -_ __,_____,_.__. ___..^ ___.,_,u.._.____.__.__" '__"'___ __.._____,',,__.,____'_ _ IHiIIJ@~tl~Ci~co.gov· This e-mail address should be different from the CEO's e-mail address Phone Fax E-mail Save and Continue https://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov/llebgs//llebg2000Jlebg_ main. prog_ contact-page?p _ bgid=6 6/28/2004 Local Law tntorcement tllOCk LTrants - LLttlLT IntroauctIon rage j or j '-" ...." 8warq BFD (;[?otÇhange", Final GrantR",RQJt ç_ºJre§º-onqf:1nC!~ Grant Handbook CEO Information P~~ïLe.'\Y Please provide or update information about the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of your jurisdiction (i.e" Mayor, City Manager, County Commissioner, etc} Use appropriate uppercase and lowercase letters throughout this application, What you enter on these screens will appear on all official grant documents. DlJN:~J"¡umb~I Ç'E:9I!1!,oflll,@on Please note that Public Safety Directors, Police Chiefs, and sheriffs (except in Louisiana) are not defined as CEOs of jurisdictions, Program Contact I!Üò rm iliLQ!1 ÇsrtiJïcªtic>r¡s St Lucie ¡~;CH-jCo ¡-:a~ 'easT a::cE:pted &vV2Jd 2; cLfferent fif3cai yea¡- Changing the CEC) fnfor-rnation C2:l.JSB éì Grant ,ÄêjustrTlent Notic:€ \G·Þ,i\,I to be generated for the other grant(s) This GAN wiii be created upon appíOval by BJÞ, _,_,'..."n.___._ ,_.._, "'__," __ ,_ ..__,___, ....____" ...._..___.._ ._._.__,_._____.__.__~ _., ._._ _~~_,....._~__~. 'Title County Administrator A ,vard and Mat~h .' Prefix Mr. .:1 Su11n1il /\pPÌlcati on . â .__~.,_" ,_~ .. .. ._ 'Rrst Name Last Name Douglas .- ,.__._.~_._--.--_.~- IAnderson - ,.-- . ,._.._-.-_..._'"--_._---_._.---~-_.- -- 12300 Virginia Ave. _... ... u_ _.___._ i)"cli n" FUi1,js -"--.,, .,--_. ._-~"..~,,-'--'.,,- -_._--._---._...__.._.~.., .._-,,--- I:kIQ£æglJerlJb../:.~-"'-º Qµe.sÜgns 'Address Line 1 "---~-----'-'--'-'---"---"- .-...--. ..- -···"C·_ -._~. ._,_.__.__._,~____.___"._.. _._______....__.__~__..__.___...._ .. . -- -.. --. . Address Line 2 _·__n_._·,",._~_~·__·_,_ -- --,--. ~"""'-"~-- ~._._--.-..~-- - -._._,.,--- ._._.~.~---.,_... LLEBG Home 'City State Fort Pierce Florida 1Qg=-OtT -.--------......---.- --.-_.._-._<--.....~._--.._.- 134982 . -15652' Need hefpfor Z¡P+' --.--.__.___._..___ ._._.___.___.__~.._~__ __m___.._......~ f772 - J462 -11723 .~ "---'--~~"-~."'~ .--,- I '--"'~' ..._'"..~- ... .--. --... f772 - 1462' _12131 .._~_..._.._.~___.______ ..__.___,__.... ___.-__u"_'._._"'___'_ HiIIJ@StluCieCO.gov 'Zip Code Phone Extension Fax 'E-mail ----..-----.._"'-"_._----._..---_._~---_..-------, .- -'-- ..._--.-..... _.--".__.._.~_.--~-,.----~-..,,---.- .-"".---...' -----.._~--_..._'^.._.,_.- -'n__.~.__.._..___.._._._ ··,s the person currently completing this application the CEO? í Yes (i No Save and Continue https://grants.ojp.usdoj ,gov/llebgs/ /llebg2000 .1lebg_ main. ChangeCeo?p _ bgid=6 6/28/2004 -- - LOCal Law l::'..ntorcement !:SIOCk lJrants - LLl::'..tllJ IntroductIon ð-'NarQ Grant Handbook O\'IT}'ie~~ DJD'JSN¡¡J]J!;cx Ç),:,-ºJI11!21 J11¡lllQ11 Program Contact Ln1ò mill ti OJ) çgItitiç:ati_OI}~ A wardJlnd Match S¡jbm¡t [\ppl ¡ cali on Qç"ìill<,-ELlncls H,<IQI"Le~!ltb'_j\ sk"ècJ Q\J~stiQI1§ LLEBG Home h9{i.-OtT Page 1 of 1 '-' ~ RJ:Q ~lªnLÇb_ªf1gE'§ Ei rtCiLGIªntBª-QQJ1 COrreSDOlJdenGª DUNS Number New Requirement fen FY 20(}4 UEBG App!icants Duns Number On October 1, 2003, the Federal government implemented a new requirement for all agencies and jUrisdictions receiving Federal funds, All grant recipients must have a valid DUNS (Data Universal Numbering System) number and must report that number when filing an application for Federal assistance/grant funds, Every FY 2004 LLEBG applicant must provide a DUNS number when submitting their application. The DUNS number must be registered to the eligible jurisdiction, not the agency/bureau/department that is filing the application, Your jurisdiction's FY 2004 application can not be submitted without a DUNS numbeL Click here for Information on how to obtain a DW~S Dumber :DUNSN~mber 1179-" -- -1247- -12318- -". Save and Continue https://grants.ojp,usdoj . gov/llebgs/ /llebg2000 .I I ebg_ main.DUNSNumber?p _ bgid=6 6/28/2004 -- ........ ..... Local Law tmorcement !:SIOCK lJrants - LLh!:SlJ IntroductIOn ðwar:.g Grant Handbook OìC¡~Ü<è\\ ]) Ul'i~J'I 1I11l ber çI::-Q_]¡llþITl1<ll¡Q11 Program Contact IntQn-1]ation <::scrtitlç¡¡tÍÇIlS A vv~ard and Mate!! SubnlI1 Application D-"èc1irw.J:imz1s 11<ili2IL~cm!-y6,5¡,-~d QUçstíoIlS LLEBG Home !&g:QJI Page 1 of 1 ~ "WI RFD GIªI1LÇbgD~e.§ finªI_ç:iLaJ1LR,ª-QQrj Correspondeflce Overview Please use the above tabs to navigate through the grant process, The Application tab allows you to complete all of the steps required to submit your FY 2004 Local Law Enforcement Block Grants (LLEBG) application, You can navigate through this section by either clicking on the steps listed on the left-hand side of the page, or by clicking on the navigation buttons provided at the bottom of each page. Only the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the jurisdiction, or the officially designated progam contact, may apply for funding under the LLEBG Program. If you are not the CEO of your jurisdiction, or the officially designated program contact, then please ºªJl-ºIDb_~licatiº11 process. Otherwise, continue with the FY 2004 application process by clicking on the Continue button below. If your jurisdiction chooses to decline FY 2004 funding, please click on the Decline Funds button to the left. Please use appropriate uppercase and lowercase letters throughout the application process, The information will appear exactly as you type it throughout the entire FY 2004 process The LLEBG fiçt ShE!E!! provides a comprehensive overview of the Program, Continue I https://grants.ojp.usdoj ,gov/llebgs/ /llebg2000 .llebg_ main. overvi ew?p _ bgid=6 6/28/2004