The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 05-04-04 "'" - , '-' ..,J REVISED (May 3, 2004) MAY 4, 2004 7:00 PM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME ALL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED. PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES AND PAGERS PRIOR TO ENTERING THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS. GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES - Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA - Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items, which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS - These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesday at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION - Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS - These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT - Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting of general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM - Please be respectful of others opinions. MEETINGS - All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Assistive Listening Device is available to anyone with a hearing disability. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at (772) 462-1777 or TDD (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. BOARD OF ~UNTY COMMISSIONERS www.co.st-Jude. fLus Paula A. Lewis, Chairman John D. Bruhn, Vice Chairman Doug Coward Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District No. 3 District No. 1 District No. 2 District No. 4 District No. 5 May 4, 2004 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES 1:[ 0 y6'l(.~ Approve the minutes of the Regular meeting held on April 27, 2004 f~~ 2. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS A. /'/ ()~feC~ ì~~(Û' Resolution No. 04-142 - Proclaiming May 9, 2004 through May 15, 2004, as "LAW ENFORCEMENT WEEK"¡ and proclaiming May 13,2004 as "LAW ENFORCEMENT MEMORIAL DAY" in St. Lucie County, Florida. - Consider staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 04-142 as drafted. B. Reading of the announcements by the County Administrator 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT ~GENDA trc) -M:~fò'(U SA. PUBLIC WORKS / 0 ~armony Heights M.S.B.U. - Initial Public Hearing Potable Water Improvements - FPUA - Consider staff ~ / ~ recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 04-140 creating the Harmony Heights M.S.B.U.¡ approve the oJ, ¡¡f;¡' preparation of an Intenacal Agreement with the City of Fort Pierce and the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority; f" ' and authorize the County Engineer to proceed with the engineering and design of the Project. 5B. COUNTY ATTORNEY Br().h ~es \(~~~~\C,0i~'~ L2\'L'ÌS l/f~ ~ CCWU-K:\ '1e'"> 'ilA \ I t / ~D\f(~OnSider Draft Ordinance No. 04-016 - Creating Section 7.10.24, of the St. Lucie County Land . JV Development Code, to establish a Height Limitation for Outside Storage of Intermodal Containers - , (Continued from BCC meeting of April 20, 2004. 5C. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution 04-076 granting the request of Cheryl and ./» ~Mark Griffin for a Conditional Use Permit to allow Landscaping & Horticultural Services (Commercial Plant ") ~e.t ursery) in the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District for property located at 9290 -Açt\}( U range Avenue - Continued from BCC meeting April 20, 2004. , , . . (Ãl^2\,) ..-. \, (\"\ ~ f'\\ íVtVe- Lt'~1'0Vé.\ \ L.~:\ ~\\ L/K- \ lJ)u\\O ~ Üú1-t~~ '-" ...tI ~:tt~~da C// fl{c~'{IY\ +Ò ___.. .J¡ 5D. GROWTH MANAGEME~ . -- C 0<1 + ; r I..< ¿ ~ 11)^ J1. I b-c,J & ;()jP/1 ~/ /~J j Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution 04-085 granting Preliminary Plannefd~it ~t9\Development approval for the project to be known as Johnston Lakes - PUD, located on northwest corner ¡{cD.:. . (0'" of the intersection of Johnston Road and Indrio Road. .. II 0L (I. I . ¡ [' i,!., ) -{ \~ 0 r éÔ S (\/)1\ -ti.ef t'U:-1' \ C Î -t t'(J-- I t \ n ~ ~? t..'eu.."?Æ . 5E. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution 04-084 granting the request of Stephan Ross / Ù \ for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse facility 1) / "') ~in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for property located at the southeast corner of the \r cl}(c0 f:: intersecti~n of South U.S. Highway No. 1 and Sunshine Boulevard (entrance to The Grove residential f<~\ commumty). END OF PUBLIC HEARINGS 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY 6~(\fl R solution No. 04-144 - St. Lucie Improvement Revenue Bonds (Land Acquisition) - Consider staff .:~\ recommendation to approve Resolution No. 04-144 as drafted. 7. COUNTY ATTORNEY ~Release of Perpetual Conservation Easement - Midway Industrial Park - Phase II - Consider staff . / , recommendation to approve the Release of Perpetual Conservation Easement and authorize the Chairman ~ . to sign the Release. _ .. . ... . /: 0 r. \ ~l f. 1\,,' ( -sA (.(~WL , /Ict~t~ ~( \ uJ..¿eK -h 0f~ ö . u...? LU¡1 \l-t 4~ I \D í~úCJCtl{l i(,r /"G)G~ lvec:!C, C'~ ~ir0'\ ,. ().\\ ~ cr , ,-". ...tI CONSENT AGENDA May 4. 2004 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve warrants list No. 33. 2. PU~IC "j0RKS ¡\ . ~. a}/"Engineering Services for Stormwater Management - Work Authorization No. 2 with Bowyer, n \::::;. .' Singleton & Associates, Inc. - Whiteway Dairy Road at s-Mile Creek Culvert Replacement. - I \. ,/ ~i Consider staff recommendation to approve Work Authorization No.2 in the amount of $52,792, , J~ / and authorize the Chairman to sign. ./B. Port of Fort Pierce Entrance Road (North 2nd Street). - Work Authorization No.2 with Taylor Engineering. - Consider staff recommendation to approve Work Authorization No.2 with Taylor Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $90,256.00 for surveying and engineering services related to North 2nd Street improvements and authorize for the Chairman to sign. 3. PARKS AND RECREATION Request for approval to serve alcohol at Frederick Douglass Park - Consider staff recommendation to approve Culpepper and Terpening's request to serve alcohol during its annual company picnic on May 8, 2004 at Fredrick Douglas Park. 4. UTILITIES A. Bid waiver and permiSSion to request quotes for the extension of a force main on North US Highway One - Consider staff recommendation to approve the bid waiver and grant permission to request quotes for the extension of a force main on North US Highway One to service the North County Utility District. B. Work Authorization with Masteller & Moler, Inc. for engineering services - Consider staff recommendation to approve engineering services for the 16" Water Main and the 16" Force Main Connection at Ft. Pierce Utilities related to Route 2 in the amount of $402,400.00. 5. COUNTY ATTORNEY Lot 47, Vikings Landing - Corrective Quit Claim Deed - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Corrective Quit Claim Deed and authorize the Chairman to sign the Quit Claim Deed. 6. PARKS REFERENDUM Lawnwood Football Stadium field and irrigation replacements - Consider staff recommendation to approve a waiver of the bid process, award a contract to the vendor with the lowest quote (total cost is estimated at $115,000), and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as drafted by the County Attorney. 7. HUMAN RESOURCES Catastrophic Inmate Medical Coverage Insurance - Consider staff recommendation to approve HR/Risk Management Department to purchase the proposed Catastrophic inmate care insurance coverage in the amount of $57,701.00 as a mean to reduce and control Inmate medical costs. · ' ST~UCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO~RS (!) X (];) o @ /.~ . (}/ Q ANNOUNCEMENTS MA Y 4, 2004 The St. Lucie County Library System will be celebrating their 50th year of public library service during the month of May 2004. Public Meeting will be held on May 6, 2004 at 5:00 p.m. in Room # 10 1, to accept public comment on the Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 150 Noise Study for St. Lucie County International Airport. The County's annual auction for surplus vehicles has been scheduled for May 15, 2004 and will be held at 3071 Oleander Avenue in Fort Pierce. The auction begins at 10:00 a.m., but the gates open for a preview at 9:00 a.m. Celebrate International Museum Day on Tuesday May 18th and enjoy free admission to the St. Lucie County Historical Museum and the St Lucie County Marine Center. Both museums are located on Seaway Drive at Museum Pointe in Fort Pierce and are open from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. International Museum Day, celebrated worldwide since 1977, highlights how museums provide an important means of cultural exchange and enrichment. On Saturday, June 12th, at 7:30 p.m. the St. Lucie Mets will host the 2004 Florida State League All-Star Game at Tradition Field in Port St. Lucie. This will be the 42nd All Star Game for the league, and the second time since the New York Mets first came to our community that the event has been held at the St. Lucie County Sports Complex. The Treasure Coast "Wings IN Wheels" Air Show is scheduled for '11 June 12th & 13th, 2004, at the St. Lucie County International Airport. The Gates open at 9:00 a.m., and the opening ceremony is scheduled for 11 :00 a.m. on Saturday, June 12th. Air performances will run from 2 to 4 p.m. each day. Admission is $7 for adults and $3 for children. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Mining Educational Presentation on our local regulations and procedures and to receive technical information on the status of materials regarding mining operations in the county on June 29, 2004 from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm in the County Commission Chambers. Please submit any questions prior to the presentation so that they can be addressed at that time. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (772) 462-1777 or TDD (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. ¡: '-' , ····'ïMíïl!(!t&liE~~~ '.... ., COUNTY",. FLORIDA' ..",,/ î Ivcvi j 1/ /'1 C~Jd REVISED (May 3, 2004) MAY 4, 2004 7:00 PM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME ALL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED. PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES AND PAGERS PRIOR TO ENTERING THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS. GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES - Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA - Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items, which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS - These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesday at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 AM., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 AM. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed Drior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION - Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS - These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT - Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting of general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM - Please be respectful of others opinions. MEETINGS - All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 AM., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Assistive Listening Device is available to anyone with a hearing disability. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at (772) 462-1777 or TDD (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. ,- BOARD OF ~UNTY COMMISSIONERS www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us Paula A. Lewis, Chairman John D. Bruhn, Vice Chairman Doug Coward Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District No. 3 District No. 1 District No.2 District No. 4 District No.5 May 4, 2004 7:00 P.M. INVOCA TlON PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES 2. PROCLAMA TlONS/PRESENT A TIONS Approve the minutes of the Regular meeting held on April 27, 2004 A. Resolution No. 04- i 42 - Proclaiming May 9, 2004 through May 1 5, 2004, as "LAW ENFORCEMENT WEEK"¡ and proclaiming May 13,2004 as "LAW ENFORCEMENT MEMORIAL DA ¥" In St. Lucie County, Florida. - Consider staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 04-142 as drafted. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT B. Reading of the announcements by the County Administrator 4. CONSENT AGENDA -~--=~-···-······--·~"~·-.--~-"._r__,,__.____._ -.-'.-.....--.----..--------,-------- I / Harmony Heights M.S.II.U. - Initial Public Hearing Potable Water Improvements _ FPUA _ Consider staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 04-140 creating the Harmony Heights M.S.B.U.¡ approve the preparation of an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Fort Pierce and the Fort Pierce Utilities AuthOrity; and authorize the County Engineer to proceed with the engineering and design of the Project. ~. i COUNTY ATTORNEY V Consider Draft Ordinance No. 04-016 - Creating Section 7. I 0.24, of the St. Lucie County Land Jevelopment Code, to establish a Height Limitation for Outside Storage of lntermodal Containers _ {Continued from BCC meeting of April 20, 2004. 5C. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution 04-076 granting the request of Cheryl and Mark Gnffin for a Condftional Use Permit to allow Landscaping & Horticultural Services (Commercial Piant Nursery) in the AR- (Agricultural, Residential - I du/acre) Zoning District for property located at 9290 Orange Avenue - Continued from BCC meeting April 20, 2004. y ...",; .- ~. Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution 04-085 granting Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known as Johnston Lakes - PUD, located on northwest corner of the intersection of Johnston Road and Indrio Road. sE. Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution 04-084 granting the request of Stephan Ross ( for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse facility t, in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No. 1 and Sunshine Boulevard (entrance to The Grove residential community). END OF PUBLIC HEARINGS --------~------- -----~----_... -- Resolutjon No. 04-144 - St. Lucie Improvement Revenue Bonds (Land Acquisition) - Consider staff ~ecmendation to approve Resolution No. 04-144 as drafted. 7. COUNTY ATTORNEY Release of Perpetual Conservation Easement - Midway Industrial Park - Phase II - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Release of Perpetual Conservation Easement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Release. //\hl~ "j IJ.r / 0/10 '- ~. ~ ...., CONSENT AGENDA May 4. 2004 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve warrants list No. 33. 2. t PUBLIC WORKS ~ . A. Engineering Services for Stormwater Management - Work Authorization No. 2 with Bowyer, Singleton & Associates, Inc. - Whiteway Dairy Road at s-Mile Creek Culvert Replacement. _ Consider staff recommendation to approve Work Authorization No.2 in the amount of $52,792, and authorize the Chairman to sign. B. Port of Fort Pierce Entrance Road (North 2nd Street). - Work Authorization No.2 with Taylor Engineering. - Consider staff recommendation to approve Work Authorization No.2 with Taylor Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $90,256.00 for surveying and engineering services related to North 2nd Street improvements and authorize for the Chairman to sign. 3. PARKS AND RECREATION Request for approval to serve alcohol at Frederick Douglass Park - Consider staff recommendation to approve Culpepper and Terpening's request to serve alcohol during its annual company picnic on May 8, 2004 at Fredrick Douglas Park. 4. UTILITIES A. Bid waiver and permIssIon to request quotes for the extension of a force main on North US Highway One - Consider staff recommendation to approve the bid waiver and grant permission to request quotes for the extension of a force main on North US Highway One to service the North County Utility District. B. Work Authorization with Masteller & Moler, Inc. for engineering services - Consider staff recommendation to approve engineering services for the 16" Water Main and the 16" Force Main Connection at Ft. Pierce Utilities related to Route 2 in the amount of $402,400.00. 5. COUNTY ATTORNEY Lot 47, Vikings Landing - Corrective Quit Claim Deed - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Corrective Quit Claim Deed and authorize the Chairman to sign the Quit Claim Deed. 6. PARKS REFERENDUM Lawnwood Football Stadium field and irrigation replacements - Consider staff recommendation to approve a waiver of the bid process, award a contract to the vendor with the lowest quote (total cost is estimated at $115,000), and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as drafted by the County Attorney. 7. HUMAN RESOURCES Catastrophic Inmate Medical Coverage Insurance - Consider staff recommendation to approve HR/Risk Management Department to purchase the proposed Catastrophic inmate care insurance coverage in the amount of $ 5 7, 70 1.00 as a mean to reduce and control Inmate medical costs. \.. ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS __._._.._"__-..-ruI_.'."~__.~_:_____,,-_.____ ANNOUNCEMENTS MAY 4, 2004 A. The St. Lucie County Library System will be celebrating their 50th year of public library service during the month of May 2004. B. fjPUbliC Meeting will be held on May 6, 2004 at 5 :00 p.m. in Room # 101, to accept public comment on the Federal Aviation Regulation (FAR) Part 150 Noise Study for St. Lucie County International Airport. C. The County's annual auction for surplus vehicles has been scheduled for May 1 5, 2004 and will be held at 3071 Oleander Avenue in Fort Pierce. The auction begins at 10:00 a.m., but the gates open for a preview at 9:00 a.m. D. Celebrate International Museum Day on Tuesday May 18th and enjoy free admission to the St. Lucie County Historical Museum and the St Lucie County Marine Center. Both museums are located on Seaway Drive at Museum Pointe in Fort Pierce and are open from 10 a.m. until 4 p.m. International Museum Day, celebrated worldwide since 1977, highlights how museums provide an important means of cultural exchange and enrichment. E. On Saturday, June 12th, at 7:30 p.m. the St. Lucie Mets will host the 2004 Florida State League All-Star Game at Tradition Field in Port St. Lucie. This will be the 42nd All Star Game for the league, and the second time since the New York Mets first came to our community that the event has been held at the St. Lucie County Sports Complex. F. The Treasure Coast "Wings IN Wheels" Áir Show is scheduled for on June 12th & 13th, 2004, at the St. Lucie County International Airport. The Gates open at 9:00 a.m., and the opening ceremony is scheduled for 11 :00 a.m. on Saturday, June 12th. Air performances will run from 2 to 4 p.m. each day. Admission is $ 7 for adults and $ 3 for children. G. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Mining Educational Presentation on our local regulations and procedures and to receive technical information on the status of materials regarding mining operations in the county on June 29, 2004 from 6:00 pm to 8:00 pm in the County Commission Chambers. Please submit any questions prior to the presentation so that they can be addressed at that time. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (772) 462-1777 or TDD (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. , , '-' ....I BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: April 27, 2004 Tape: 1-2 Convened: 9:00 a.m. Adjoul11ed: 11 :45 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairperson, Paula A. Lewis, Frannie Hutchinson, John D. Hrll11l1, CI ill' B¡l\1ws, DOllg ( 'oward Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Ray Wazny, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Dennis Murphy, Community Development Director, Pete Keogh, Parks and Recreation Director, Paul Phillips, Airport Director, Jack Southard, Public Safety Director, Roger Shinn, Central Services Director, Beth Ryder, Community Services Director, Sheriff Mascara, Millie Delgado-Feliciano, Deputy Clerk I. MINUTES (1-245) It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded byCom. Bruhn, to approve the minutes of the meeting held April 20, 2004; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMA TlONS A. Resolution No. 04-121- Proclaiming May 3, 2004 through May 7, 2004 as T. Lucie County Correction Officer's Week" in St. Lucie County, Florida. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Brulm, to approve Resolution NO. 04-121; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. The County Administrator announced the Employee of the Quarter- Woody Newsom, Golf Pro. " C. The Board of County Commissioners congratulated Fairwinds Golf Course for being listed in Golf Digest's "Best Places to Play" for Top Courses Averaging 50,000 rounds a year or more. D, The County Administrator read upcoming events. J. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS Mr. Charles Grande, Hutchinson Island, addressed the Board regarding Growth M¡lIlagement and density. 4. CONSnNT A(ìnNDA (1-544) It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve the Consent Agenda with items C9F and Cl2 being pulled; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List No. 32. 2. PUBLIC SAFETY Celiificate ofPub1ic Convenience and Necessity- The Board approved advertising a public hearing on the application orCoastal Care ror a Class F Con to be held at <):00 iLlIL 011 May II, 2()()~, 1 '-' .,J 3. P ARKS AND RECREA TrON A. Purchase orthe Sodium Hypochlorite Feed System EQ04-255 and BA04-l47- The Board approved EQ 04-255 and ßA 04-147 to purchase thc Sodium Hypochlorite Feed System l'or the renovated Ravenswood Pool in Port St. Lucie. B. Seabreeze Janitorial Contract C04-01-055 termination- The Board approved the cancellation of Scabreeze Janitorial contract (C04-01- 055) and permitted staff to negotiate with and hire the second lowest qualilied bidder (Beach land Cleaning) or negotiate with and hire the third lowest qualified bidder (Ninety -Five South) if negotiations with Beach land Cleaning Service are unsuccessful. In the event both negotiations do not work out, staffwas authorized to go out for bid. 4. HUMAN RESOURCES Adjustment to the four year pay and classification plan (year five) - The Board approved the adjustments to the pay and classification study retroactive to April 1, 2004 except for the Strategy & Special Projects Department, growth Management Department and the new positions for Community Services and Code Enforcement which are effective April 27,2004. 5. PUBLIC WORKS A. Permission to advertise for Public Hearing for Ten Mile Creek Recreation Area and Queens Island Preserve- The Board approved the request to advertise for public hearing. B. Second Amendment to Contract No. COO-090539 Harbor Branch Environmental Labs, Inc.- The Board approved the second amendment and authorized the Chairman to sign. C. Non-Exclusive Commercial 'Solid Waste and Recyclable Material Collection Service Agreements for ABC Dumpsters- The Board approved the Non-Exclusive Commercial Solid Waste and Recyclable Material Collection Service Agreements and authorized the Chairman to execute. Ü. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET A. Resolution No. 04-137 for a $200,000 grant from the FDEP l'or the River Park Marina- The Board adopted Budget Resolution 04-137 establishing the budget l'or the Florida Protection for the River Park Marina. B. Inter-rund Loan from the General Fund Emergency Reserve (001) to North County Utility District- Capital Facilities Fund (479) and Budget Resolution No. 04-127- The Board approved Budget Resolution 04-127 to establish the bÜdgct for the inter-fund Joan from the General Fund Emergency Reserves into the North County Utility- Capital Facilities Fund. The inter-fund loan will be repaid at an interest rate of2%. 7. UTILITIES Ilow,ml C. Osternlíln, Inc., to provide Utility Consulting Service- The ßoard approved I IowaI'd C. Osternlíln, Inc. 10 provide Utility Consulting Service in connection with the North County Utility District in the amount 01'$75,000. 2 04/23/04 FZABWARR FUND 001 001001 001131 001149 001157 001158 001162 001163 001284 001285 001286 001288 001809 101 101001 101006 101215 101217 102 102.001 102107 , ... , 107001 107002 107003 121 140 140001 160 183 183001 183004 185003 185004 235 262 310002 315 316 382 39003 401 401225 418 421 441 449 451 458 461 471 478 479 481 491 505 611 625 ~ ...." ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD WARRANT LIST #32- 1?-APR-2004 TO 23-APR-2004 FUND SUMMARY TIlLE General Fund Recreation Special Events FTA Section 5303 Grant FY01 Section 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning 2004 CSBG Grant FY04 Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab 03/04 FDCA/FEMA Continuity of Operations Net Loss Commercial Fishing Stories TRIP Grant FY04 S.L.C. MentaÍ Health Collaborative FDCA/EMPA 2004 TDC Planning Grant FY 03/04 SFl~-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust Interlocals Transportation Trust/Impact Fees FDOT Traffic Signal System Grant OTTED Tropicana/Signal Upgrade Un:ncorporated Services Fund Dräinage Maintenance MSTU FCOT Bicycle/Ped. Coordinator 03/04 Li~rary Speçial Grants Fund Fi~e & Forfeiture Fund Fi~e & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Fi~e & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper Bläkely Subdivision Fund Port & Airport Fund Port Fund Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court FH?A SHIP FY02/03 FE?A SHIP FY03/04 Becker Road 1&S Fund Tourism Dev 4th Cent 1&S Fund Impact Fees-Parks County Building Fund CO'.lnty Capital Environmental Land Capital Fund Revels Lane1 MSBU Capital Sa~itary Landfill Fund FDEP Waste Tire Grant FY 04 Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities NHI Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund NHI Util - Capital Facilities Fund S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund SH Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin No Cty Util Dist-Renewal & Replace No Cty Util Dist-Capital Facilities Airport Utilities District Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Library GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 594,355.68 7,400.00 86.53 346.83 5,357.42 170.54 19,000.00 670.68 3,751.36 7,900.05 205.44 30.06 167.94 44,246.74 13,801. 00 17,306.09 51. 85 45,639.40 6,384.73 19,565.70 103.17 2,048.21 274,129.55 550.11 30,694.62 187.41 70.96 7,869.65 1,331.53 1,870.58 1,383.47 2,194.54 2,145.88 81.45 191.62 16,412.50 475,749.12 37,870.00 151,312.81 410,956.06 1,519,684.12 213.44 155,194.44 1,349.25 25,426.12 8.41 681.26 8.42 2.41 7,624.13 13,629.84 7,822.59 3,862.74 2.41 20,897.41 2.46 3,343.31 80,482.78 343.77 7,349.15 4,051,519.74 PAGE 1 PAY RO::" L 543,050.69 0.00 1,149.-17 4,628.85 1,436.73 1,261.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 400.41 1,261.54 118,572.14 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,868.ó1 5,154.33 1,366.19 l,738.-n 109,388.30 879.52 879.52 0.00 O.JO 11,762.43 O.JO 2,666.40 5,053.59 1,171.35 1,970.41 0.00 2,599.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 42,695.90 0.00 23,887.~4 114.11 2,705.59 114.04 32.58 529.53 146.63 15,289.41 3,300.56 32.58 32.58 32.78 40,497.93 3,167.07 4,509.11 0.00 1,002,349.02 \.r "wtII 8. CENTRAL SERVICES Change Order No.3 to Contract C02-07-561 with Norment Security Group, Inc.. Rock Road Jail Security System upgrade- The Board approved Change Order No.3 to increase contract 10 days for a completion date ofMay2, 2004 and authorized the ChainTIan to sign the Change Order as prepared by the County Attorney. 9. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Economic Development Council of St. Lucie County-2003004 Investment/Partnership Fee Contract- The Board approved the proposed contract with the Economic Development Council of St. Lucie County, and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract. B. Declaration of Surplus Property according to Ordinance No. 02-18- The Board approved declaring the attached list of thirteen parcels surplus and directed staff to proceed with disposal pursuant to Ordinance 02-18. C. Revocable License Agreement- Holiday Pines Property Owners Association, lnc.- The Board approved the after the fact Revocable License Agreement with Holiday Pines Property Owners Association, Inc., to record the Revocable License Agreement in the Public Records or St. Lucie County, Florida. D. Port of Ft. Pierce- Harbormaster Bond for Jesse W. Porter- The Board approved Jesse W. Porter to guarantee his perfornlance as harbormaster for the Port of Ft. Pierce. E. Historic Resources Survey- I:'ourth Amendment to May 7,2002 Agreement with Janus Reseårch, Inc.- The Board approved the proposed forth amendment to the May 7,2002 agreement with Janus Research, Inc., and authorized the Chairman to execute the amendment. F. Partial Release of Lien- This item was pulled. 10. GRANTS A. Rural Capital Assistance Support Grant- The Board authorized staff to apply for (he Rural Capilal Assistance grant in the amount of approxinwlcly $117,0()() und nccept if funded. The Board authorized Ihe Chai I' signing Resolution 04-139 and other documents associated with the grant application. B. Recovery Land Acquisitions Grant Application- The Board approved the Chair signing the Recovery Land Acquisition grant application to the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the US Fish and Wildlife Service in the amount of approximately $1.15 million to assist with the acquisition of environmental lands connecting to Paleo Hammock. C. Florida Communities Trust Florida Forever Program for funds to assist in the acquisition of Paleo Hammock Addition, a 423 acre project that is immediately adjacent to Paleo Haml110ck Conservation Area- The Board approved submittal ol"the grant application lor the Paleo Ilammock Addition Project to the I'lorida Communities Trust Florida Forever Program in the amount of approximately $2.34 million. 3 '-' ..." D. Florida Communities Trust Florida Forever Program for funds to assist in the acquisition of Heathcote Botanical Park and authorize the expenditure of $27,000 for development of the preliminary conceptual plan necessary for the FCT application- The Board authorized the submittal of the FCT grant application for Heathcote Botanical Park in the amount of approximately $2.9 million and the expenditure of $27,000 for a preliminary conceptual plan necessary for the FCT application. The Board also approved Budget Amendment 04-148. 11. PURCHASING Award Bid # 04-036 Roll Off Containers- TheBoard approved awarding Bid # 04-036 Roll Off containers to Equipco Manufacturing for $33,200 (8x $4150). The Board also approved the revised equipment request # EQ04-195 to cover the purchase of this Wheel Loader. 12. COMMUNITY SERVICES This itcm was pulled. REGULAR AGENDA 5. NO PUBLIC HEARINGS SCHEDULED 6. CENTRAL SERVICES Approval of Selection Committee's recommendation to move fOlward with the Design/Build Expansion of the St. Lucie County Correctional Facility by Centex Rooney/Schenkel Shultz- Consider staff recommendation to approve the Centex/ Rooney Schenkel Shultz as the Design/Build Firm fo1'the Rock Road Correctional Facility Expansion Project at a fixed film price of$18,Q55,000.00 approve total funding of $20,500,000.00 and authorize the Chairperson to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. Com. Hutchinson advised the Board that due to the fact that her son is employed by one of the sub-contractors for this project, under the perception of conflict, the County Attorney suggested she abstain from voting or any discussion on this issue. . Mr. Manny Suarez, DLR Consultants from Orlando, Florida and the assigned County Consultant, addressed the Board and gave a brief history of where the county is today. Mr. Dave Schultí'., ScIH.:nkel, Shultz, Architects l'or the project, mldressed the Board 011 the timctable 1'01' completion. He advised the Board that according to the schedule, the first pod would be available for occupancy by May 31, 2005 and the second by June 28, 2005. Sheriff Mascara addressed the Board and updated everyone on the Budget requirements for year 004/005. The expected increase in operational costs is from $15.2 million to $20.1 million. This amount will be off set with $1.5 million in revenue generated from housing Federal inll1a(cs. which would bring the nct cost to $18.6 million the next budget years. This is based 011 the ;¡SSUll1ptioll III;¡[ we willllave 100 Federal inmates at a cost or $85.00 per day and this has been budgeted at the completion date of May housing thcm ror 5 or 6 months. 4 ''I '-" ...."" III addition to tile additional cmployees needed to house the inmates, there will be additional medical costs. The company has given us an idea that there will be an increase of between 40 and 50% this alone is over a one million dollar increase. Fiscal year budget 05/06 the cost increases to $23,219,000 operational costs would be off-set by 2.4 million dollars from housing 80 Federal inmates per day at a charge of $85.00 and this has been budgeted for the entire year. The 06/07 budget, operational costs for the entire facility would be $28.5 million this would be off set by $2.1 million of revenue generated by Federal inmates at 70 inmates being housed at that time at a cost 0[$85.00 per day for the entire year. Net cost $23.6 million. The Shcri ff advised the Board that presently due to the over crowding of the jail, the ratio is I staff member per 7.8 inmates. Com. Barnes addressed the Board with his concerns and why he was not going to vote for the package. He stated a year ago he was told the cost would be $16 million and now it has increased to $20 million. A year ago he was told the new pods were for maximum security inmates, now there is only one pod for maximum security and the other for medium security. The Board was also promised the Federal inmates would be picking up the tab for the foreseeable future and now it does not look as if this will happen. Com. Barnes expressed his concern with the budget within the next 3 years is $10.5 million more in operations than it is today. The County has not budgeted for these Increases. The County Administrator stated they are looking for alternatives for funding. They are meeting with the Judges primarily with Judge Angelos on the GPR. He will continue to work with the Finance Director of the Sheriffs office on the budget. There are many issues with Article V that need to be addressed. Com. Coward questioned if this building would house the need in the future. The Sheriff stated that at this point, he and those he closely worked with on the project felt it would. Com. Barnes asked how and when was the decision made to build medium security pods without infom1ing the Board of this decision. The representative from the Architectural finn stated the medium security pod can be converted into a maximum security pod with building a wall to divide sleeping area and also the plumbing would already be there for the additional bathroom facility. Com. Barncs stated he woulclnot vote in favor of anything other than maximum security pods. 'I'll\.: Sll\.:rifTadvisL:d 111\.: Board oftlw liability and the (llct that there arc 7 law suits pendj ng due to the overcrowd jng at the j ai I. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recommcndation; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Barnes; Aye's: Coward, Bruhn, Lcwis with Com. Hutchinson abstaining; motion carried by a vote of 3 to 1. Com. Hutchinson requested staff and the Sheriff get together with the entities and try to do something at the State level. 7. GROWTH MANAGEMENT 5 " . ~ ~ ME1VlO ..., 01 St. Lucie County Commissioncrs 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 "'1 Dill & Jeannc lIearn 5051 Tozour Road Fort Pierce, FL 34946 Datc April 27, 2004 Pages 1 Phone (772) 461-7527 Fax . (772) 468-8688 Rc: April 27, 2004 - BOCC ~g~,~~,t1",~~~ (Comm. Barnes - Off Road Vehicle Plan) TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: We request this memo be made part of the public record. First of all, we would like to say, we do not have an objection to an Off Road V chicle Park, if properly located, except for the liability concerns it presents for our County to sponsor and operate such an activity. Please review the following concerns that should be addressed before going to the expense and effort of staff going through the process of Zoning Changes and' developing a Business Plan. After discussing the issue with Paul Phillips, Airport Director, many issues have not been researched that should be, certainly before going ahead with the costly details of a Business Plan and Zoning Changes. QUESTIONS AND CONCERNS 1. This activity needs to be outside the Urban Service Boundary where the impact on nearby homes would be less intrusivc. Over 700 acres is a lot ofland to designate for this use. 2. Apparently Mr. Phillips has not verified with FAA that the property can be used for this activity. It is our understanding there are specific uses for property purchased with FAA & FDOT funding. These arc - "airport related uses." How does this qualify? This land needs to be immediately available for potential large firms trying to locate here. 3. Homeland Security. The county has gone to great expense at the airport for fencing to meet these sccurity requirements.' Often times fences are cut or damaged for access into restricted areas. A great example of this damage is in the North Savannas - ask Steve Fousek how often the off road vehicle riders have tom the gates down. 4. According to the aerial maps this area does have wetlands on it. Has a Wetland Delineation been performed? Certainly it should be a priority to determine what portion of the land can be used for such use. Will the wetlands be mitigated or ignored? Will all riders respect the sensitivity of the wetlands on the subject property as well as the large valuable wetland area to the East ofproject? 5. Has consideration been given forresidential property East and North of the proposed project? Mr. Phillips states (these vehicles will have mufflers) - who will monitor the noise? 6. After talking to Mr. Phillips, entrance to this park will be using the same road as our award winning golf course. That course is truly an asset and already has sporadic noise from the airport. Constant noise from Off Road Vehicles will not make a good neighbor. 7. Will alcohol be allowed? We have seen off-road activity closely related to alcohol use as well as disregard of property. Litter potentially is a problem associated with this type of recreation. 8. Who will monitor these activities? Who will keep financial records on fees'we supposedly will charge? We already have an overburdened staff and we ask that you give this added cost your consideration. 9. Liability? Does the county realize that this is a well documented, high risk activity with severe and often times deadly injuries? We feel, it is premature to jump into this without firstgetting answers especially from DEP on the wetland delineation issue (DEP is being very strict with the properties, immediately across Indrio Road.). Approval should be obtained from FAA and FDOT as well as address the Homeland Security issues bcforc procecding. We ask you to not go forward us presented today until the above questions are answered in full. Thank you for your attention to these concerns. ~ 'Y~ ~ \ . " , ; ~ ~ Appointment of a Board Member to the Corridor Management Entity- Consider staff recommendation to appoint a Board member to the Corridor Management Entity- Com. Lewis volunteered. At this time Com. Hutchinson left the meeting and was present for any of following votes. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to ratify Com. Lewis' appointment; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 8. ADMINISTRATION Off Road Vehicle Plan- Discussion by Com. Barnes Mrs. Jcan Hearn submitted the attached letter regarding this issue. In a brief discussion, staff was directed to address the issues, obtain more infomlation, answer all questions and concerns, provide an analysis before moving forward with any design and look into a11 procedural requirements. ADDITION Revised Interlocal Draft with the City of Port St. Lucie Law Enforcement Impact Fees- Consider staff recommendation to approve the revised interlocal draft with the stated changes as per the County Attorney. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve staff recommendation, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. Bi-Weekly Committee Reports- The Board provided updates. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Chainnan Clerk of Circuit Court 6 , '--' ...".¡ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 0(1} DATE: May 4, 2004 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 04-142 - Proclaiming May 9, 2004 through May 15, 2004, as "LAW ENFORCEMENT WEEK"; and Proclaiming May 13,2004 as "LAW ENFORCEMENT MEMORIAL DAY" in St. Lucie County, Florida. BACKGROUND: Chaplain JeffL. Owens ofthe St. Lucie County Sheriffs Office, has requested that this Board proclaim May 9, 2004, through May 15, 2004, as "Law Enforcement Week; and proclaim May 13, 2004 as "Law Enforcement Memorial Day" in St. Lucie County, Florida. The attached Resolution No. 04-142 has been drafted for that purpose. FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 04-142 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: [~APPROVED [] DENŒD [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 E: Do gl sAnderson County Administrator County Attorney: !k Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing : Originating Dept, Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicableJ___ Eff, 5/96 r \ '-" ....", RESOLUTION NO. 04-142 A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MAY 9, 2004, THROUGH MAY 15, 2004, AS "LAW ENFORCEMENT WEEK"; AND PROCLAIMING MAY 13, 2004 AS "LAW' ENFORCEMENT MEMORIAL DAY" IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. The Congress and President of the United States have designated May 15 as Peace Officers' Memorial Day, and the week in which it falls as Law Enforcement Week. 2. The S1. Lucie County Sheriffs Office has been constituted by the State of Florida to uphold the laws and play an essential role in safeguarding the rights and freedoms ofthe citizens of S1. Lucie County. 3. It is important that all citizens know and understand the problems, duties, and responsibilities of their law enforcement agencies, and that members of our Sheriffs Office recognize their duty to serve the people by safeguarding life and property, by protecting them against violence or disorder, and by protecting the innocent against deception and the weak against oppression or intimidation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board does hereby proclaim May 9, 2004, through May 15, 2004, as "LAW ENFORCEMENT WEEK" in S1. Lucie County, Florida. 2. This Board does hereby further proclaim Thursday, May 13, 2004, as "LAW ENFORCEMENT MEMORIAL DAY" in honor of those peace officers who, through their ""' , . t '-" ...., courageous deeds, have lost their lives or have become disabled in the perfonnance of their duty. 3. This Board calls upon the citizens of S1. Lucie County and upon all patriotic, civic and educational organizations to observe the week of May 9 - 15, 2004, as Law Enforcement Week with appropriate ceremonies in which all of our people may join in commemorating sheriffs deputies, past and present, who by their faithful and loyal devotion to their responsibilities have rendered a dedicated service to their communities. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 4th day of May, 2004. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY From: To: Date: Subject: Jeff Owens Lewis, Paula 4/5/2004 5:05:29 PM Law Enforcement Memorial Week Proclaimation 'O-~ ~. -"""-7 rP.é3"~J,?' ~~~is,~' Law Erforce . Commissioner Lewis: It is once again my honor to present the attached draft for the commission's consideration as a proclaimation reference Law Enforcement Week in May, Thanks for forwarding it to the appropriate channels. Please have someone contact me as to when it may be presented, I'll be happy to pass the date along to the sheriff, FYI- The memorial seNice is scheduled for May 13th, 6:30pm at Morningside Church. Chaplain Jeff L Owens #351 St. Lucie Co, Sheriffs Office Office: (772)462-3437 Mobile: (772)201-7255 jowens@stluciesheriff, com á 'r1 )eu),'5 c:::r:: í//c ;rnj;' p( () lilt'S OYJ MCLt..¡ LjA, PI"ekSêU'ô.'L ::;elem 4= c;;;J-A-, - ,¡J ~Þfs ~ - #" From: To: Date: Subject: Jeff Owens Lewis, Paula 4/5/2004 5:05:29 PM Law Enforcement Memorial Week Proclaimation Commissioner Lewis: It is once again my honor to present the attached draft for the commission's consideration as a proclaimation reference Law Enforcement Week in May. Thanks for forwarding it to the appropriate channels. Please have someone contact me as to when it may be presented, I'll be happy to pass the date along to the sheriff. FYI- The memorial service is scheduled for May 13th, 6:30pm at Morningside Church. Chaplain Jeff L Owens #351 St. Lucie Co, Sheriffs Office Office: (772)462-3437 Mobile: (772)201-7255 jowens@stluciesheriff.com .. J ;;. '-"' \.,,¡ DRAFT FOR RESOLUTION- ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Whereas, the Congress and President of the United States have designated May 15 as Peace Officers' Memorial Day, and the week in which it falls as Law Enforcement Week; and Whereas, the St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office has been constituted by the State of Florida to uphold the laws and play an essential role in safeguarding the rights and freedoms of the citizens of St. Lucie County; and Whereas, it is important that all citizens know and understand the problems, duties, and responsibilities of their law enforcement agencies, and that members of our Sheriff's Office recognize their duty to serve the people by safeguarding life and property, by protecting them against vioJence or disorder, and by protecting the innocent against deception and the weak against oppression or intimidation; Now, therefore, we, the Board of Commissioners, call upon all citizens of St. Lucie County and upon all patriotic, civic and educational organizations to observe the week of May 9-15,2004 as Law Enforcement Week with appropriate ceremonies in which all of our people may join in commemorating sheriff's deputies, past and present, who by their faithful and loyal devotion to their responsibilities have rendered a dedicated service to their communities. We further call upon all citizens of St. Lucie County to observe Thursday, May 13, 2004 as Law Enforcement Memorial Day in honor of those peace officers who, through their courageous deeds, have lost their lives or have become disabled in the performance of their duty. In witness thereof, we have hereunto set our hand and caused the Seal of St. Lucie County to be affixed. AGENDA REQUEST ...., ITEM NO. 5A DATE: May 4, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: ~fL~~ Michael pOWIf:P.E. County Engineer SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DEPT SUBJECT: Harmony Heights M.S.B.U. - Initial Public Hearing Potable Water Improvements - FPUA BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAIL. (State type & No. of transaction or N/A): N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: April 6, 2004 - Board granted permission to advertise the Initial Public Hearing RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 04-140 creating the Harmony Heights M.S.B.U.; approve the preparation of an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Fort Pierce and the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority; and authorize the County Engineer to proceed with the engineering and design of the Project. ()C; APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 uglas M. Anderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: [x]County Attorney Jy Coordination/Sianatures [x]Public Works Dir .>~~. -@l ",.'" [x ]Finance I.\\~'ð- [x]Mgt. & Budget UiJ t(\~ [x ]Co. Eng /VI'I? [ ]Purchasing [x]MSBUCoor X+=> '-" .....I COMMISSION REVIEW: May 4, 2004 ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners Michael Powley, County Engineer M vþ April 21, 2004 Harmony Heights M.S.B.U. - Potable Water Improvements ( FPUA) Initial Public Hearing BACKGROUND At the request of residents within the Harmony Heights neighborhood, the County agreed to petition their area to determine if there was sufficient interest in creating an MSBU to provide a potable water distribution system. Due to the large size of the district, staff elected to use MSBU "balloting" forms versus the standard petition. Thereby, the petitioning results are based upon the number of votes received. The "ballots" were mailed to the benefiting property owners on June 10, 2002. The mailout included a Public Information Document, which provided an overview of the project, benefits of a centralized water system and the MSBU Program. The informational document also explained the City of Fort Pierce's annexation policy. The balloting results were tabulated (attached) and based upon those ballots received, 82 % support creating an MSBU for potable water service. The Initial Informal Meeting was held with the residents on February 26, 2004, to discuss Fort Pierce Utilities Authority as the utility service provider, the conceptual water design, MSBU process, annexation issues, and to provide the residents with a rough estimate of the cost. Based upon the consensus of opinion of those present at the meeting, it was determined that the County should proceed with the MSBU project. The Fla. Dept. of Health has written a letter, strongly supporting any efforts to make water potable water available to this area. In 1993, a SWIM study ranked Harmony Heights as a first priority for connection to utilities because of potential threat to the drinking water. A copy of the letter is attached. In order to create the M.S.B.U. for potable water service provided by the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority, the County must first enter into an interlocal agreement with the City of Fort Pierce and the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority. This agreement will establish FPUA and the County's responsibilities with respect to this specific project. Under this agreement, the County agrees to assess the property owners for the municipal improvements provided by the FPUA. The FPUA will be responsible for the design, permitting, and construction ofthe potable water system, administration of the construction contract, inspection, and final '-' "WII acceptance of the system for maintenance. St. Lucie County will be responsible for the administration of the M.S.B.U.. The water distribution system shall consist of a looped system, with fire hydrants provided to meet current fire protection requirements. The method of assessment for the potable water improvements shall be based upon the "Equivalent Residential Connection" (ERC) method, whereas each property owner is assessed equally for the improvements. The estimated project cost reflects a 60% construction cost credit, which is used to offset FPUA's customary water capital charge of $1,378.00 per ERC. With an additional FPUA monetary contribution of $626,000.00+/- and waiver of their customary 15% engineering services fee ($338,000+/), the estimated project cost, excluding interest and tax collector fees is $3,347,000.00+/-. Estimated assessment amount per ERC $4,500 to $4,600 Estimated annual payment $500 to $550 Estimated Prepay amount** $3,600 to $4,000 (**excludes financing fees and interest charges) RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 04-140 creating the Harmony Heights M.S.B.U.; approve the preparation of an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Fort Pierce and the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority; and authorize the County Engineer to proceed with the engineering and design of the Project. BP Attachments (3) cc: Staff Concurring Tax Collector Property Appraiser FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF ....,./ ~ HEALT Jeb Bush Governor John O. Agwunobi, M,D" M.B.A. Secretary September 13, 2002 RE: Harmony Heights To Whom It May Concern: The Florida Department of Health/St Lucie County Health Department strongly supports a Municipal Services Benefit Unit to expand public water service into the Harmony Heights subdivision. We believe it is a potential public health risk based upon the existing drainage, infrastructure reliance on wells and septic tanks, and this Department's historical familiarity with the area gained through three decades of documented site visits made in the performance of our programs. The soil of Harmony Heights is composed of primarily Waveland fine sand (Soil Survey of St. Lucie County Area, Florida, University of Florida and United State Department of Agriculture). These soils are poorly drained and nearly level with a high water table and subject to regular flooding. For all commercial and residential uses this official reference caution of excessive wetness. This office is familiar with the hydrologic dynamics of this area through our administering the Onsite Sewage Program (septic tanks). Performing numerous site visits in this area, certified health department staff determines soil classification and the estimated wet season water table. Their work routinely confirms those factors that, in combination, present a potential health problem. Water for this subdivision is obtained from over 250 relatively shallow private wells (60-90 feet). Prolonged or heavy rains routinely cover numbers of these wellheads. While all wellheads are ostensibly grouted, age and careless maintenance often create cracks and separations in the annular space allowing contaminated water to seep directly into the water table. We know that wells installed before the Health Department was delegated authority in July 2000 were often not grouted or only partially grouted but there is no process or legal remedy to enforce widespread proper repair. This office has been tracking replacement wells and well repairs but there is insufficient data at this time. Likewise, there has been no study of illness relating to private wells although there is growing anecdotal evidence this may be the case. We do know, however, that contaminants present include organics, pesticides, fertilizers, petroleum products and heavy metals from road runoff. Based upon these concerns, and in keeping with state policy, this department issues precautionary boil water notices in times of flooding or after prolonged rains. Environmental Health Division 5150 NW Milner Drive. Port St. Lucie FL 34983 (772) 873-4931 . Fax (772) 873-4893 http://www.stluciecountyhealth.com '-' "'wI Harmony Heights Page 2 This subdivision is served by septic tanks that this office believes may, and often does, adversely impact the quality of drinking water drawn from private wells. Septic tanks are point sources of pollution in close proximity to wells, which are direct conduits to the water table. Flooding inundates septic system drain fields bringing bacteria laden effluent to the surface thus giving it access to wells. At the inception of this subdivision and until the 1980'5, less stringent well and septic system construction codes existed which contribute to this department's concerns. In addition, the 1993 Surface Water Improvement and Management (SWIM) Act study (Septic Tank Study for Sf. Lucie County Florida, South Florida Water Management District SWIM Program, James Moses, RS. and James Anderson, RS.) on the impact of septic systems on the Indian River Lagoon ranked Indian River Estates as a first priority for connection to utilities because of their potential threat to surface water and the surficial water table. Sincerely, ~'\,V'\9--, t;L,"-'\.;~'-...,.;' (( s J es Moses, RS. nvironmental manager Florida Department of Health/St. Lucie County Health Department ~ 'wtI RESOLUTION NO. 04-140 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, DETERMINING THAT A PROJECTTOPROVIDEPOTABLE~ATERIMPROVEMENTSTO CERTAIN PROPERTIES IN HARMONY HEIGHTS IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE COUNTY AND WILL BE OF BENEFIT TO THE PROPERTIES WITHIN A PROPOSED HARMONY HEIGHTS MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT; DETERMINING THAT 100% OF THE BENEFITS OF THE PROJECf WILL ACCRUE TO PROPERTIES WITHIN A PROPOSED HARMONY HEIGHTS MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT; DETERMINING THAT THE METHOD OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE POTABLE ~ATER IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE BASED UPON THE EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL CONNECfION METHOD; DETERMINING THAT THE COST OF THE PROJECf IS NOT IN EXCESS OF THE BENEFIT; CREATING THE HARMONY HEIGHTS MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT; RESOLVING THAT 100% OF THE COST OF THE PROJECT SHOULD BE FUNDED BY NON-AD VALOREM SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ON PROPERTIES WITHIN THE HARMONY HEIGHTS MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT THROUGH AN ASSESSMENT BASED ON AN EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL CONNECfION METHOD OF ASSESSMENT; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY DIRECfOR OF ENGINEERING TO PROCEED WITH THE PROJECf AND PROVIDING AN EFFECfIVE DATE WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 125, Florida Statutes and Chapter 1-13.5 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances (the "Code), the Board of County Commissioners for St. Lucie County, Florida (the "Board") has the authority to establish municipal services benefits units ("MSBU's") in unincorporated St. Lucie County to provide, among other things, drainage improvements and potable water service; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code, the Board has adopted procedures which govern the establishment and administration of such MSBU's; and WHEREAS, on April 6, 2004 pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 1-13.5 of the Code, the Board accepted petition ballots from the land owners for potable water improvements within a proposed Harmony Heights Municipal Services Benefit Unit (the "Harmony Heights MSBU") requesting that the Board create the Harmony Heights MSBU to fund the cost of a project to provide potable water improvements to properties within the Harmony Heights area in unincorporated St. Lucie County (the "Project"); and -1- ~ ~ WHEREAS, on May 4, 2004 pursuant to the requirements of Section 1-13.5 of the Code, the Board held a duly advertised initial hearing to consider the creation of the Harmony Heights MSBU, proof of publication of this hearing is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the County Engineer has advised the Board that based on an analysis of the costs and benefits of the Project, the equivalent residential connection method of assessment is appropriate because this method of assessment fairly and reasonably apportions the cost of the project among the benefited properties; and WHEREAS, after hearing the comments of the County staff as well as interested persons, the Board has made the following determinations: (1) the Project and the creation of the proposed Harmony Heights MSBU is in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of the County and will be of benefit to the properties within the limits of the proposed Harmony Heights MSBU; (2) the percentage of the benefits of the Project which will accrue to properties within the limits of the proposed Harmony Heights MSBU as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "B" is 100%; (3) the method of assessment to be used in assessing the benefited properties shall be the equivalent residential connection method; and (4) the cost of the project is not in excess of the benefit gained by each of the properties which would be subject to the proposed assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, as follows: Section 1: A municipal services benefit unit to be known as the Harmony Heights Municipal Services Benefit Unit is hereby created as shown on the attached Exhibit "B". Section 2: The entire cost of the Project shall be funded through non-ad valorem special assessments levied against real property within the limits of the Harmony Heights MSBU. Section 3: The method of assessment shall be based on the equivalent residential connection method of assessment such that each lot owner within the Harmony Heights MSBU shall share proportionately in the cost of the Project in relationship to the benefit received. Section 4: The County Director of Engineering is hereby authorized to proceed with the Project pursuant to the procedures set forth in Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code. Section 5: In the event the Project is not ultimately approved and constructed, the cost of preparing the plans, specifications, and the cost estimates may be assessed against the real property within the Harmony Heights MSBU. -2- ~ ....,¡ Section 6. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 4th day of May, 2004. ATfEST: BOARD OF COUNIY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney -3- ~ 'will EXHIBIT A PROOF OF PUBLICATION -4- o (j) <: (j) Õ "0 3 (j) ;t C/) I h Q) """I " 3 :g 0 C :J »'< I ü ~ PJ (f) :S. :J CD CD C :iE PJ (f) ...... ('!) ~ ...... ('!) ...., Qo :iE ~ ('!) ...., J} š: ü Éß ã5" C ...., () CD () ;::¡: '< ~3" ;::¡: (f) š:: PJ "0 "0 œ "0 PJ œ » Q. ~~ I\.) CJ) I\.) 8 .þ. ~ ~ ¡;) '" q _. - If" AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO.~.B Date: May 4, 2004 Regular [ ] Public Hearing [X] Consent [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Heather Young Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 04-016 - Creating Section 7.10.24, Land Development Code, to Establish a Height Limitation for Outside Storage of lntermodal Containers BACKGROUND: See c.A. No. 04-643 FUNDS A V AIL. (State type & No. of transaction or N/A): N/A RECOMMEND A nON: Based on the recommendation of the Growth Management Director, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners not adopt proposed Ordinance No. 04-016. COMMISSION ACTION: IX! APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 D u s M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: .~ I Coo rdina tion/SÏ!ma tures Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept.: )C Other: Other: Finance (Check for Copy only, if applicable): '-' ...., INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 04-643 DATE: April 27, 2004 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 04-16 - Creating Section 7.10.24, Land Development Code, to Establish a Height Limitation for Outside Storage of Intermodal Containers BACKGROUND: On April 20, 2004, the Board of County Commissioners held the second of two required public hearings on proposed Ordinance No. 04-016 which would amend the Land Development Code to establish a height limitation for outside storage of intermodal containers. An intermodal container is a type of container which may be loaded on a ship, barge, train, or tractor trailer. Intermodal container storage facilities are currently permitted only in Industrial-Heavy (I-H) zoning districts and require a conditional use permit. The proposed ordinance was originally drafted at the request of the Harbor Advisory Committee with the understanding that the standard height of a container is eight feet (8') and a sixteen feet (16') limitation would allow two containers to be stacked. On March 25, 2003, the Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance and voted 4-3 to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed ordinance as drafted. Following the Local Planning Agency meeting, staff received information that while the interior height of a container is eight feet (8'), the exterior height is actually nine feet six inches (9' 6"). Therefore, a sixteen feet (16') limitation would permit only one container and eliminate any stacking of the containers. If the Board wishes to permit two containers to be stacked, a minimum height limitation of nineteen feet (19') would be necessary. A copy of the proposed ordinance with this revision as presented to the Board on April 20, 2004 is attached to this memorandum. Following public comments and discussion by the Board, the hearing was continued to May 4, 2004. One of the issues regarding the proposed ordinance which has been raised by several members of the public to date concerns whether the ordinance is necessary given the current Land Development Code requirement of a conditional use for an intermodal container storage facility, Under the conditional use process, the Board has the ability to impose height limitations at the time the conditional use is considered. Therefore, the Board would havè the opportunity to evaluate each proposed facility on an individual basis to determine what height limitations were appropriate for that site. At that time, a decision could be made whether to set a specific height restriction or, as an alternative, limit the number of containers which could be stacked. 1 '-' .....,1 Based upon the above, the Growth Management Division has recommended that the Board not adopt the proposed ordinance at this time. RECOMMENDA TION/CONCLUSION: Based on the recommendation of the Growth Management Director, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners not adopt proposed Ordinance No. 04-016. Respectfully submitted, ~ ír7r Heather Young Assistant County Attorney Attachment HY/ Copies to: County Administrator Assistant County Administrator Community Development Director Clerk Press/Public 2 \w ....., ORDINANCE NO. 04-016 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 2.00.00 TO ADD A DEFINITION OF "INTERMODAL CONTAINER" ; CREATING SECTION 7.10.24, OUTSIDE INTERMODAL CONTAINER STORAGE HEIGHT LIMITATIONS; PROVIDING CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. On August I, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, adopted the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 2. The Board of County Commissioners has adopted certain amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, through the following Ordinances 91-003 - 91-021 - 93-001 - 93-005 - 93-007 - 94-018 - 95-001 - 97-001 - 97-003 - 99-002 - 99-004 - March 14,1991 November 7, 1991 February 16, 1993 May 25, 1993 May 25, 1993 August 16, 1994 January 10,1995 March 4, 1997 September 2, 1997 April 6, 1999 August 17, 1999 91-009 - 92-017 - 93-003 - 93-006 - 94-007 - 94-021 - 96-010 - 97 -009 - 99-001 - 99-03 - 99-005 - May 14, 1991 June 2, 1992 February 16, 1993 May 25,1993 June 22, 1994 August 16, 1994 August 6, 1996 October 7, 1997 February 2, 1999 August 17, 1999 July 20,1999 --------~----------------------- Ordinance #04-016 Draft #3 Underline is for addition Gtrilt(; TMrotJgn is for deletion Page 1 PRINT DATE: 3/259/04 '-' 99-015 - 99-017 - 00-010 - 00-012 - 01-003 - 02-009 - 02-029 - July 20,1999 September 7,1999 June 13, 2000 June 13, 2000 December 18, 2001 March 5, 2002 October 15, 2002 99-016 - 99-018 - 00-011 - 00-013 - 02-005 - 02-020 - 03-005 - ..." July 02,1999 November 2, 1999 June 13, 2000 June 13, 2000 June 24, 2002 October 15, 2002 October 7, 2003 3. On March 25, 2004, the Local Planning Agency/Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance after publishing notice in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing and recommended that the proposed ordinance be approved. 4. On April 6, 2004, this Board held its first public hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune on March 26, 2004. 5. On April 20, 2004, this Board held its second public hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune on April 10, 2004. 6. The proposed amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code are consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and are in the best interest of the health safety and public welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. THE SPECIFIC AMENDMENTS TO THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO READ AS FOLLOWS, INCLUDE: -------------------------------- Ordinance #04-016 Draft #3 Underline is for addition Glril(f: To¡rOl:Jlo¡ is for deletion Page 2 PRINT DATE: 3/259/04 '-" ...." **************************** CHAPTER II 2.00.00 DEFINITIONS Intermodal container: An intermodal container is a type of storage container which may be loaded onto an airplane. barge. ship. train. and tractor trailer. **************************** CHAPTER VII 7.10.00 SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS 7.10.24 OUTSIDE INTERMODAL CONTAINER STORAGE HEIGHT LIMIT A nON *********************** PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY . -------------------------------- Underline is for addition Strike TI'lrotlgn is for deletion Ordinance #04-016 Draft #3 Page 3 PRINT DATE: 3/259/04 \.. , ..." If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall beheld to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable in the unincorporated area of St. Lucie County. PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk be and is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART F. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. PART G. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Paula Lewis XXX Vice Chairman John D. Bruhn XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX -------------------------------- Underline is for addition Gtrike; TI'Irol:l¡t\is for deletion Ordinance #04-016 Draft #3 Page 4 PRINT DATE: 3/259/04 \. ...,¡' PART H. CODIFICA TION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that parts B through H shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ENACTED this day of ,2004. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY I FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney g: \atty\ordnance \2004 \04-16.wpd -------------------------------- Underline is for addition Slril(c Throl:lgh is for deletion Ordinance #04-016 Draft #3 Page 5 PRINT DATE: 3/259/04 - ~ '-" "wtI1 Agenda Request Item Number Date: 5C 05/04/04 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. ] [ ] [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ X ] SUBJECT: anagement Director Consider the request of Cheryl and Mark Griffin for a Conditional Use Permit to allow Landscaping & Horticultural Services (Commercial Plant Nursery) in the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District for property located at 9290 Orange Avenue - Draft Resolution 04-076. To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Growth Management BACKGROUND: Cheryl and Mark Griffin have requested a Conditional Use Permit for property located at 9290 Orange Avenue to allow Landscaping & Horticultural Services (Commercial Plant Nursery) in the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) Zoning District. (File No: CU-04-003) FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: At the April 21, 2004, meeting the Board of County Commissioners continued the public hearing to May 4, 2004, in order to give the applicant more time to get a letter of support from her neighbor for a waiver from the requirements of an 8-foot fence between residential and non-residential uses. At the March 18, 2004, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0, with three voting members (Mr. McCurdy, Mr. Akins, and Ms. Hammer) absent, recommended approval of the requested conditional use permit, subject to four limiting conditions. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-076. COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED 1/ OTHER Approved 5-0 Motion to approve without a new wall or buffer required by applicant. C(¡ D DENIED '" County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget: "'t)ther: uA Purchasing: Other: '-' """" Commission Review: May 4, 2004 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Growth Management Director DATE: April 28, 2004 SUBJECT: Application of Cheryl and Mark Griffin, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow Landscaping & Horticultural Services (Commercial Plant Nursery) in the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) Zoning District. LOCATION: 9290 Orange Avenue ZONING DISTRICT: AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) FUTURE LAND USE: RU (Residential Urban) PARCEL SIZE: 4.27 acres PROPOSED USE: Landscaping & Horticultural Services (Commercial Plant Nursery) SURROUNDING ZONING: PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) to the north. AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) to the west, east, and south across Orange Avenue. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing use surrounding the property is vacant, agricultural, and some residential. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is RU (Residential Urban) to the north, south, east, and west. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #11 (Shinn Road), is located approximately 9.5 miles to the southwest. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property is in the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) service area. ~ ....",¡ April 28, 2004 Page 2 Subject: Cheryl and Mark Griffin File No.: CU-04-003 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way width for Orange Avenue is 100 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity. ************************************************************* STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for the proposed conditional use, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed conditional use is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed conditional use has been determined not to be in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The subject property is located in an area, which is generally used for residential and agricultural uses. Section 3.01.03(E)(6), AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre), allows landscaping & horticultural services as conditional uses subject to Board of County Commission approval. 2. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would have an adverse impact on nearby properties; The proposed conditional use is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. Provided that the proposed conditional use, the operation of a commercial plant nursery (landscaping and horticultural services), is done in accordance with applicable laws and best management practices, this activity is not anticipated to have any negative effects upon any adjacent lands or interests. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including roads, police protection, solid waste disposal, water, sewer, drainage structures, parks, and mass transit; \...; '-" April 28, 2004 Page 3 Subject: Cheryl and Mark Griffin File No,: CU-04-003 This intended uses of the subject property for a commercial plant nursery is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. Any development will need to demonstrate that there are adequate public facilities in the area to support such development. It is not expected that the proposed business would significantly increase traffic along Orange Avenue. The applicants currently live and must continue to live on the subject property. 4. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed conditional use is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The site is currently being utilized for a single-family home. COMMENTS The applicants, Cheryl and Mark Griffin, have applied for the requested conditional use in order to operate a Landscaping & Horticultural Services (commercial plant nursery) business from the subject property. Landscaping and Horticultural Services are allowed as conditional uses in the AR-1 Zoning District subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. The applicants currently live and must continue to live on the subject site. Provided that the proposed conditional use, the operation of a commercial plant nursery (landscaping and horticultural services), is done in accordance with applicable laws and best management practices, this activity is not anticipated to have any negative effects upon any adjacent lands or interests. At the April 21, 2004, meeting the Board of County Commissioners continued the public hearing to May 4, 2004, in order to give the applicant more time to get a letter of support from her neighbor for a waiver from the requirements of an 8-foot fence between residential and non- residential uses. Staff contacted the neighbor, Hilda Young, who stated that she did not understand why an 8-foot fence or wall would be required for the proposed conditional use, but that she did not want to sign a letter of support for the waiver of the fence as she would like to remain neutral in the situation. She also was concerned about aerial spraying of the plants and the effect on her property, which is currently vacant. At the March 18, 2004, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0, with three voting members (Mr. McCurdy, Mr. Akins, and Ms. Hammer) absent, recommended approval of the requested conditional use permit. At this hearing, the Planning and Zoning Commission determined that the proposed use as a commercial plant nursery required an 8-foot barrier between the subject property (as a non- residential use) and adjacent properties. The commission recommended a fourth condition of approval to require the applicants to obtain releases from the 8-foot wall requirement from adjacent property owners in order to support a waiver from the Board of County Commissioners for the 8-foot wall or fence. Since these written releases have not been obtained from all adjacent property owners, staff recommends that the wall be provided on the east property line of the property. Staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and "" ....., April 28, 2004 Page 4 Subject: Cheryl and Mark Griffin File No.: CU-04-003 policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you approve the requested conditional use permit, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicants must continue to live on the subject property in order to allow the conditional use permit to remain in effect. 2. The applicants must retain a minimum 20-foot buffer along all property lines so as to not encroach on adjacent properties. 3. The removal of any native vegetation shall require a Vegetation Removal Permit issued by the Environmental Resources Division. 4. The applicants may obtain letters of release from the adjacent property owner to the east to support a waiver from the Board of County Commissioners of the 8- foot fence requirement between residential and non-residential uses along this property line. 5. The applicants must obtain a waiver of the 8-foot fence requirement from the Board of County Commissioners or provide for the fence along the eastern property line. 6. Only plant material grown on-site may be sold. Staff recommends that the Board grant a partial waiver from the requirements of an 8-foot fence along the north and west property lines. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 04-076, which, if approved, would grant a conditional use permit to allow Landscaping & Horticultural Services (Commercial Plant Nursery) in the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) Zoning District. Please let me know if you have any questions. SUBMITTED: hf cc: Cheryl and Mark Griffin County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 '-'" "'wI RESOLUTION 04-076 FILE NO.: CU-04-003 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW LANDSCAPING & HORTICULTURAL SERVICES (COMMERCIAL PLANT NURSERY) IN THE AR-1 (AGRICULTURAL, RESIDENTIAL - 1 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Cheryl and Mark Griffin. presented a petition for a Conditional Use Permit to allow Landscaping & Horticultural Services (Commercial Plant Nursery) in the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) Zoning District, depicted on the attached maps as Exhibit "A" and described in Part "B" below. 2. On March 18, 2004, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve a conditional use permit to allow Landscaping & Horticultural Services (Commercial Plant Nursery) in the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential-1 du/acre) Zoning Districtforthe property depicted on the attached Maps and described in Part B below. 3. On April 20, 2004, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. That meeting was continued to the May 4, 2004, public hearing of the Board of County Commissioners. 4. On May 4, 2004, this Board reconvened the public hearing on the petition. 5. The proposed Conditional Use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 6. The proposed Conditional Use will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. File No,; CU-04-003 May 4,2004 Resolution 04-076 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 \...; 'wi 7. The proposed Conditional Use will be serviced by adequate public facilities and services. 8. A Certificate of Capacity as required under Chapter V, St. Lucie Land Development Code, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on April 21 ,2004. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a Conditional Use Permit for Cheryl and Mark Griffin, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow Landscaping & Horticultural Services (Commercial Plant Nursery) in the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) Zon ing District is hereby granted for the property described below, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicants must continue to live on the subject property in order to allow the conditional use permit to remain in effect. 2. The applicants must retain a minimum 20-foot buffer along all property lines so as to not encroach on adjacent properties. 3. The removal of any native vegetation shall require a Vegetation Removal Permit issued by the Environmental Resources Division. 4. The applicants may obtain letters of release from the adjacent property owner to the east to support a waiver from the Board of County Commissioners of the 8- foot fence requirement between residential and non-residential uses along this property line. 5. The applicants must obtain a waiver of the 8-foot fence requirement from the Board of County Commissioners or provide for the fence along the eastern property line. 6. Only plant material grown on-site may be sold. B. Pursuant to Section 7 .09.04(E) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a partial waiver for an 8-foot fence or wall between a residential and non-residential along the north and west property line of the subject property, is hereby granted for the property described below. C. The property on which this Conditional Use Permit and Partial Waiver of the fence requirements is being granted is described as follows: File No.: CU-04-003 May 4, 2004 Resolution 04-076 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 D. 16 17 18 19 20 E. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 F. 29 30 31 32 33 34 G. 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ~ "" THAT PART OF THE EAST 5 ACRES OF THE WEST 10 ACRES OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF SECTION 1 0, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE CO. FL LYING WEST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER RUN EAST ALONG NORTH LINE 310.29 FEET FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE CONTINUE EAST 620.58 FEET THENCE SOUTH TO SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER TO A POINT 929.91 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER THENCE WEST 619.94 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (Tax ID#: 2310-142-0001-000/2) (Location: 9290 Orange Avenue) This Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire on April 20, 2005, unless a zoning compliance is obtained or an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(B)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The Conditional Use Permit approval granted under this Resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Cheryl and Mark Griffin, including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary permits and authorizations from the appropriate Local, State, and Federal regulatory authorities prior to the issuance of any local building permits or authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part B. The Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, shall remain valid for the period of Conditional Use approval. Should the Conditional Use approval granted by this resolution expire or an extension be sought pursuant to Section 11.07 .05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a new Certificate of Capacity shall be required. The St. Lucie County Growth Management Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis xxx Vice-Chairman John D. Bruhn xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx File No.: CU-04-003 May 4,2004 Resolution 04-076 Page 3 '-" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Cliff Barnes ....,.¡ xxx xxx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 4th Day of May 2004. ATTEST: Deputy Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney hf H:\ W ORD\Petitions\BCC\Fin ished. 04 \GriffinCU\GriffinCU-RES ,doc File No,: CU-04-003 May 4, 2004 Resolution 04-076 Page 4 '--" '-II 1 2 3 Exhibit A 4 5 6 Maps 7 8 · General Location Map · Area Subject to the Conditional Use Permit Approval · Certificate of Capacity 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 File No.: CU-04-003 May 4, 2004 Resolution 04-076 Page 5 c ....... z ~ A ~ ,:' C) CV) ~ ~i I I 0 .Y. 0 ~ I 'O~' t " ro "'" I ~ 0 ~ J >I '~æ I I oð ::J Ü () ~ ~ \ C. ~ I Q) ~ .!: Ü ... ... .., ... .., II: ~ II: Z ~ ~ 0 ~ ü z -- ~ 0 c -..,- Ü a: +--0 LlJ I > 0,- - ~ -- ã: OJ +-' i ... I'! . ---., co.. eII_....",. ... Z ~ : o °1 ¡::: .. .. a: I: ~o .., ~ II: D---.J -- _ 110."", ~ Z II: ~ 15 ~l·J -., ?; IIN r ... ... ... I tIJIII ... .., .., II: II: s ~[ 1 S S[ 1 AlNn08 3380H833>10 '\ ~ ~ "'" A Petition of Cheryl and Mark Griffin, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow Landscaping and Horticulture Services in the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential) Zonin District. I '0 1. 0 0 0: II - õ I .I: U "" 0 t:) Brittain c Conal No. 4 Gran e Avenue I I +--1- A L_ I 0 ¡ ~ fi CU 04-003 / / / / / /f This pattern indicates ~ subject parcel 5è.£~s~~ t Map prepared March 2. 2004 This fNIP hu bewi compi~ !Of' 08'*111 pWnng IRI rehnnoI putpCIMII only. N 'MIiM ~ IIfJort hu t.n mede to ~ the moc QftW Ind .:on.. InlomwIion poubIe, It II not Intend8d for 10M U . Iegdy binding dOCU'nent \.or '...I Zoning Cheryl and Mark Griffin PUD AR-1 d- ~ :> ~ :t 1 ¡ I ! :; ::. ~ :; >- () ffl Þ ~ - PUD ~ IP >. ~ I~ 0 . -g j 3: 0 - 0::.... ~ In .:>t /' AR-1 u =-= ~- ¡,.: 0 Æ .D ~ '0 ... 'õ I-- - I- - ~I- ...J r---- ~ - ., ..... I '- _I ... - ~ ~ J~R-1 ~ R~ I ~ I Con No. 4~ Oranqe Avenue I I I I I I "0 1 ,h I I~I L_ 0 0 'tN-~1 II:: II - IAR-1 A õ R~ ^ s: --1211 U u -t::. .>t I -;11 0 I' t) AR-1 Brittoin Av ~I Cf D 1 A..... I Mn- (J ~ c u tÐ CU 04-003 ~ This pattern indicates subject parcel 5ê.L~~~>. f Map prepared March 2, 2004 This tTIIIP IW been ccmøiIed far gMnIp/Irvq and ~ ~ anty N WhIle .-y-'lart'"-1»wI nwclllO prorwidIIlhI rnoItcurr.nln GU" Inlormation poIItiII. it. not inIendIId for '*' . . Iegdy binding documInI Land Use II I Brittain c \...-- Cheryl and Mark Griffin I ~ .L ~ R I I .\-l ~ A L J:. _ U ~ I g U¡ ~ r: CU 04-003 V' / / / / /I This pattern indicates rLLLLL1 subject parcel e Avenue .....I 1: - RU . >. o .~ .~ u . 0 .D "0 'õ ..J ~.L-ø~~ ! GIS ~~>"~ r Map prepared March 2, 2004 ThiI fMØ hu bMn complied for glnll'lIpIiWIning .00 rftr«JQt putpOMI ~ N WhIle fNfIIfyeflortl'lu been "*" 10 ptO'o/IdIh mcJIC~~.xv.. InforrnItiOn poNtiI,itil notir1lr.dal fof... _ -loti binding docunn. ~ Cheryl and ....., Mark Griffin CU 04-003 f/ / / / / ~ This pattern indicates ~ subject parcel c"'__ j , ~._~ ,.x-. /_u.:-u;- ~~~~ . ~~ GIS ..¿.~~ -"'~' Map prepared March 2, 2004 Thil"'IIP hM bMn oompIIed JagllWalpa.ming and ~ ~ Q'l1y. N YttIiIe ewry effort "- been rMde to prtMdI thII moll currWd.-xl ~ inIormROn pœùJII, it. not Ì'II~ lor UM .. . ~ binding docurnWIt '-' '...I Cheryl and Mark Griffin ----------------------------~ I I I I I I I I I I I I ~ 1.. & Avenue: I I 1.52 : .~9 I I I ----- 22.91 I I I I I I I I I I I 14.07 k~ II 0.9 L_ --1---- ~ - ~ ~: CU 04-003 ....... 500' boundary ~ This pattern indicates subject parcel 4.84 II I õ s:. u ... o C) Brittain c >. o .~ .... u . 0 .t:I 'U 'õ ...J 5k- Á~ &....t¡~~ ! GIS ....~<".---~, 1 Map prepared March 2, 2004 This meø hes been compiI«f kit ~ p.nng Md r....-.œ pupoMI 0itÍ1 N 'M1I1e fNeT'/ effort hU been IT.:te 10 prcMde the moll curr.m and ec:cullte inlamwtion pouibII, II: i. no! r.tendId fof U8II .. . ~ bnding documen!. U"Oftl~IAL- ~ """ SUBJECT TO PlANNJNG & ZONINI COMMISSION APPROVAL AGENDA ITEM 6: CHERYL AND MARK GRIFFIN - FILE NO. CU-04-003: Mr. Hank Flores, presenting staff comments, stated that Agenda Item # 6 was the application of Cheryl and Mark Griffin, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow Landscaping & Horticultural Services (Commercial Plant Nursery) in the AR-l (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District for 4.27 acres of property located at 9290 Orange A venue. Landscaping and Horticultural Services are allowed as conditional uses in the AR-l Zoning District subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. The applicants currently live and must continue to live on the subject site if the conditional use permit is approved. Provided that the proposed conditional use is done in accordance with applicable laws and best management practices, this activity is not anticipated to have any negative effects upon any adjacent lands or interests. Staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in the Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, subject to three limiting conditions. 1. The applicants must continue to live on the subject property in order to allow the conditional use permit to remain in effect. 2. The applicant must retain a minimum 20-foot buffer along all property lines so as to not encroach on adjacent properties. 3. The removal of any native vegetation shall require a Vegetation Removal Permit issued by the Environmental Resources Division. Mr. Hearn questioned if a 20-foot buffer would be required on this project since it is a commercial use. Ms. Young confirmed that would be correct since this is a commercial business. Mr. Hearn stated that the Land Development Code requires that an 8-foot fence also be required since it is a commercial business that adjoins or abuts a residential use. Ms. Young confirmed that would be correct, unless the applicant receives signed waivers from the neighbors stating it is not necessary for them. Chairman Grande questioned if the applicant was present. Mr. Mark Griffin stated that he was the applicant. He stated that there is a neighbor to the west of their property but north and South of the property there was not anyone. Ms. Young questioned if the applicant would have any non-residential structures on the property. Mr. Griffin stated that they would not. Ms. Young confirmed that the 8-foot fence would not be a requirement then. Ms. Cheryl Griffin stated that they did not realize that they would need a conditional use permit since there would not be any public entering the property on a regular basis. She P&Z I LPA Regular Meeting March 18, 2004 Page 14 of 22 ~ ....I UNOFFlCIAL- SUBJECT TO PLANNING & lONfN8 ~r;!\AMISSION APPROVAL stated that they would be growing trees and shrubs to sell at flea markets. She also stated that they have had discussions with the neighbors about their proposed business and had no objections. Chairman Grande opened the public hearing. Seeing no one, Chairman Grande closed the public hearing. Mr. Lounds questioned if they could add a condition requiring the applicant to provide signed, notarized letters from their neighbors waiving the fence requirement prior to the Board of County Commissioners Meeting. Mr. Lounds stated that after considering the testimony presented during the public hearing, including staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in Section 11.07.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to the application of Cheryl and Mark Griffin for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the operation of a Landscaping and Horticultural Service Business in the AR-l (Agricultural, Residential - 1 dulacre) Zoning District because I think it will help develop income in the western area where most of us don't even know where it is and we ask that they ask their neighbors to put into the file before it goes before the Board of County Commissioners a waiver for the 8 foot fence restrictions allowed under this zoning, including the conditions listed in the Staff report. Motion seconded by Mr. Hearn. Upon a roll call vote the motion was unanimously approved (with a vote of 6-0) and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. P&Z I LPA Regular Meeting March 18,2004 Page 15 of 22 '-' "'" - - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ~=r. ~eJel E ~'". ~~ COUNTY')IJj, . F L " . 0 RID A·':·' . COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR April 10, 2004 In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that CHERYL A. AND MARK S. GRIFFIN, have petitioned St. Lucie County for a Conditional Use Permit to allow Landscaping and Horticultural Services in the AR-l (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) Zoning District for the following described property: Location: 9290 Orange A venue. THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AILABLE UPON REQUEST The second public hearing on the petition will be held at 6:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on April 20, 2004, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex, 2300 Virginw Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing. County policy discourages communication with individual County Commissioners on any case outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or provide written comments for the record. The proceedings of the County Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the County Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462- 1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. Please call (772) 462-1580 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number CU-04-003. Sincerely, ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ~a£~~/~ JOHN D. [)RUHN, District No.1· DOUG COWARD, District No 2 . PAULA A. LEWIS, District No.:) . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, Disrrict No.4. CLIFF [)ARNES, District No.5 County Administrotor - Douglos M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Administration: (772) 462-1590 · Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GISffechnical Services: (772) 462-155J Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 · Fox: (772) 462-1581 Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 · Fox: (772) 462-21 J2 WWW.co.st-lucie.fl.us ~ '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: To allow Landscaping and Horticultural Services Regarding Property Located At: 9290 Orange Avenue. Currently Zoned: AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: ADril19.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): Address: Date: Signed: Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: (FILE NO. CU-04-003 - Cheryl and Mark Griffin) '-' 'wi ~ o o (\ Ñ .c o C¡j ~ .-0) tOO O)C') ~C') C')C') I'-(\ C')1t) tOC') C')O) (\O (D(D tOO (\~ C').- ~~ .-0 (D1t) .- .- C')C') ~"7 C')(\ c\Jcn J,Lb .- (\ r:..~ (D(\ ~~ 1t)(D ~~ Q, ~.- 0) O)(\ ~~ 0) Ñ C')C') ~ ~I'- ~ C')C') C') C')I'- C')C') C') S S ..J..J ..J ..JX ..J..J ..J ..J ..J (I) u.u. u. u.1- u.u. u. u.u. CD ¡¡¡ 'C CD CD .c CD CD CD (¡j ~ ~ 1:: ~ ~ 0 'C 0 rei CD CD c: ~ CD CD (¡j :J c: ,_ ë: ë: 0 ë: ë: ë: rei rei E ûí CD ..J ~ 'E rei 1:: 1:: :J ~ 1:: 1:: 1:: 1:: Õ rei ~ 0 0 0 rei 0 0 0 0 ..J U. u. :I: ..J U. U. U. U. 'C > ð iD ¡¡¡ .c 'C 'õ CD :J a: 'C ~ CD ~ Õ (¡j a: > U E « « £; c: rei 'Ë ~ ~ to èi5 il: :.¡;¡ E c: to c: c: 0 rei rei c: c: .- ::J .c CD ü 'E ~ CD 1/1 rei rei .- 0 ãí ¡¡¡ ., 1/1 rei è5 è5 )( t> (\ u:i ~ Q) ..J en 0 z c ... 0 It) 0 (\ ED en (D .- 0 "0 0 (D 0) 0 0 0) a 0 (\ 0 "0 It) It) (\ C') 0 ~ I'- ~ « C') .- 0) 0) a. ~ C') C') (\ C') Q) E 1\1 C II. ..J ~ « ~ rei Q) :a CII C ~ CD c: 'C .c rei C 0 ü en ::¡ Q) c: E 0 1\1 !!? z ~ CD ..J 'C ~ ¡¡¡ c: Q) c:.c ~ « C ,- 0 c: ~ :g ~ .c ::J 0 0 "a. t> ., Q) E 1\1 C II. ,.. ~ I- 0 ... en U Q) rei ~ CD E C E CD CII ~ :g ... E U ... J: rei rei CII 0 0 0 ~., en ., ., 0 ü c: 0 ïii U 'Ë U Q) 0 c: E rei E .= 1\1 .c C ::J èñ U 0 ..J Õ rei ! ü " c: ,.. ~ ¡¡¡ CD ~I- ... g rei Q) ::J c: .c U :2 ... 50 C 'E :¡: 0 rei CD ~ :J U 0 C CD 0 '1: rei "3 ::J Qj enc 0 > > " a. iI t> ..J a. zu. (D <0 (\ 0) ,.... ~ I:i~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 8 88 0 0 0 0 @j .- (\ 0 (\ (\.- 0 0 0 0 00 U 8 0 0 8 8 0 88 'C 0 0 0 rei 0 ~ (\ (\ .- .- (\ .- 0 e ..... ~ ~ .- .- .-0 a: 0 0 .- 0 ~ ~ ~ to ¡¡¡ CD 0 0 0 >C C;; C;; C;; C;; .- C;; C;; C;; C" I~I C') CIIS (\ (\ (\ (\ (\ (\ (\ (\ üen c o iii "> is .!: (1):1: - ... CJCJ ..;~ c ... Q) 1\1 E::E 8'011 ãi~ > Q) Q)s::. Co ~ . -M CO ê~ EO 0:) 00 .... ... o 0 ...... C" Q) .!!! E- t:g' 1\1 .- 0.= Q) 1\1 C::E '- '....I 0101 IIOIICr 0101 III1CI ST LUCIE COUNTY 80ARO OF COMMISSIONERS PUBliC HEARING AGENDA .....,20,_ TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN NOTICE " ner'by giv," it! .C(ord.nee with Sec- 110n 11.0003 of rh, 51. Lucie COiln,y L.nd Dtvet. o,om.nl Cod, ,nd in accord'ne. Vrtl" the provi. l'On, 01 Ih, 51 Lucie COunly Compreh.nl¡.,. PI.n. thac the Iollo"";"g 'øølant, hÞt rlqutlted fn" tht 51 lucit County Solrd 01 ComnhMioners consid,r Ih,i, follOwing reQUntl: CHERYL A. AND MARK S. GRIF'lN, fo, . ConcIi. ~i:~::.~':.~~:1 jl~ ~~~i~1"~:~:Ytu-:::' ~~:: Cftnti, . 1 du!acr" Zoning District lor lhe follow. ing described øropetrv: THAT PART OF THE EAST 5 ACRES Of THE WEST 1 D ACRES OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF THE NORTHEA,ST ONE QUARTER OF SfC.: rlON 10. TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH. RANGE 3. EAST. ST. LUCIE CO. fl LVING WEST OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED TRACT FROM THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE SQUTHEAS ONE DUARnA OF THE NORTHEAST ONE DU.... TER RUN EAST ALONG NORTH LINE 310,21 FEE FOR THE POINT OF BEGINNING THENCE CON. TlNUe EAST 62051 FEET THENCE SOUTH TO SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST ONE aUAR. TER DF THE NDATHEAST ONE DU"'TEA TO A POINT 92991 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWfST CORNER Of THE SOUTHEAST ONE QUARTER OF TIiE NORTHEAST ONE QUARTER THENCE WEST "',IM FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGIN. NING Loulion'9290 Or.nge Aven,,-. TRAVIS E_ MURPHY. JR,. for. Changl in Zoning f'om rhe CN ¡Commerci.I, Neighbomoodl Zoning Oil1r_ict 10 the CO ,fComm.,cIIJ. Officel Zoning DISUIe! lot the foflO'Mng described proøerty: Lois 11 through ,. and the south 10 '"' of Ih, vi. ~:;'~I'~"~:~r:(1:. ~~~~dil:S~;' ::r;.tn~ 21, of the Public R'cords of 51 Lucil County. Florid. lOC.tlon:13t3 W.st Midway Ro.d. sid. of Trow. bridgt Flo.d. 'Øørolim.tely <100 f.eI lOulh 0' I in1.,seclion 0' Or'n8' Av,nu. 'I'd Trowbridg. ROld PATRICIA GRIFFIN LOWE. '0' , Condition'l U.. P,rm.t to ,lIow 'or the 0P'''Iion of , rrding st.bl, in th. AR·1 IAericultur'l. Residt"Ii.1 . 1 dUf.,,,) Zoning OtSlrrCI 'or Ihl 101l0"'/n8 de. s,ribld p10øerty: TRACT 321~ LOT 6. BLOCK 2, SECnoN 2., TOWN SHIP J6 SOUTH. RANGE '0 EAST. PlAT NO.1. ST LUCIE GARDENS ACCORDING TO TIiE PlA TH£REOF AS RECOFlDEO IN PlAT lOOK '. PAGE 3S OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS DF ST LUCIE COUNT Fl LESS TN S 115 FT SUBJECT TO AN EASEMENT OVEA AND ACROSS THE E 30 FEET AND N .5 FT FOR ROAD, UTILITY AND DRAIN. AGE loc.-ion-7001 Gulloni PI.ce ROBERT R/GEl. for. COndi'lon.1 Use Permi' 10 .r lol¡t 'or the operillion o' Ih, Hutchin.on 111'nd Sloraga ,.Cilily In Ihe CG (Comm.rci.,. Gln.r., Zoning District lor the following d.scribed prop, ,"y. TAKE AS THE POINT OF BEGINNING THE INTER. SECTION OF THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WA.Y LINE OF STATE ROAD AlA. AND THE NORTH LINE OF NETTLES ISLAND AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 16. PAGE 1. ST LUCIE COUNTY FLOAIDA. THENCE RUN N 12 DEGREES ",0'- ALONG ntE WfSTEAL Y RIGHT Of WAY LINE Of AlA A DISTANCE DF 30350 FEET; THENCE AUN S II DEGREES 20'21' W A DISTANCE OF '33. FEET: THENCE RUN 5 1 DEGREE 3I'J1· E A 01$. TANCE OF 18000 FEET; THENCE RUN S II DE. GREES 20'n- W A DISTANCE OF SOU1 FEET; THENCE AUN S 1 DEGAEE )1'31' E A DISTANCE OF 20000 FEET; THENCE RUN S B' DEGREES 20·n- W A DISTANCE DF "800 FEET, MORE OR lESS TO THE SHORE OF THE INDIAN 'UVER. THENCE MEANDER SOUTHEASTERlV ALONG THE SHOAE OF THE INDIAN RIVEA A DISTANCE OF 3BO FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE SAID. NORTH LINE OF HEnLES ISLAND. THENCE RUN N 72 DEGREES 10'50" E ALONG SAID NORTH LINE OF NETTLES ISLAND A DISTANCE OF 133C 00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. SAIO PARCEL CONTAINING 10. ACRES MORE OA LESS. LOUliO":9751 S. Ocun Drive, di,eclly north ° Nen'" l'l.nd Relirtm.nl Community f'uellC HEA.RINGS "'III be held In rtte- Commi"io C....mber.. Roger Poitr" Ann"., 3rd Hoor, 51. .Lu ~:';:I~n~"A=:;~~~rtt:~~1 ~~ldA:;1 ~~~2::'~': ginning .t 6:00 P.M. or II soon In"..h.r It pos. sibl, PURSUANT TO Section 211.0105. flo,id. SI.hltts ir . person mid.. 10 'ppe.1 .ny deci.k)n mid. bv . bo.rd. ~.~, or CO","'uSlion "'itl'l r..øect 1o .ny men., ConSld,red ,t . mHhng or he.ring. h. will need . "cord or Ihe Droc.eding.. .nd Ih.f. 'or such purPO.... h. m.y "lid 10 I""'re Ihlt . verb.llm record of Ih, Proc..ding. j mad.. which r.cord includu rh. ",¡¡many '"d eVld.nc, upon wf'Iu;" th'IØØf" is to be t»...d BOARD O~ COMMISSIONERS ST, LUCIE COUNT'!'. FLORIDA 151 P.ul. l.e.is. CHAIR Publish· April 10. 2004 5077022 - '-' .....,1 Planning and Zoning Commission Review: 03/18/04 File Number RZ-04-003 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: FROM: Planning and Zoning Commission Planning Manager (J!L March 12, 2004 '.' DATE: SUBJECT: Application of Cheryl and Mark Griffin, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow Landscaping & Horticultural Services (Commercial Plant Nursery) in the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) Zoning District. 9290 Orange Avenue LOCATION: ZONING DISTRICT: AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) FUTURE LAND USE: RU (Residential Urban) PARCEL SIZE: 4.27 acres PROPOSED USE: Landscaping & Horticultural Services (Commercial Plant Nursery) SURROUNDING ZONING: PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) to the north. AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) to the west, east, and south across Orange Avenue. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing use surrounding the property is vacant, agricultural, and some residential. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is RU (Residential Urban) to the north, south, east, and west. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #11 (Shinn Road), is located approximately 9.5 miles to the southwest. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property is in the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) service area. - '- ...." March 12, 2004 Page 2 Subject: Cheryl Ann Griffin File No,: CU-04-003 RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way for Orange Avenue is 100 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity. ************************************************************* STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for the proposed conditional use, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed conditional use is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed conditional use has been determined not to be in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The subject property is located in an area, which is generally used for residential and agricultural uses. Section 3.01.03(E)(6), AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre), allows landscaping & horticultural services as conditional uses subject to Board of County Commission approval. 2. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would have an adverse impact on nearby properties; The proposed conditional use is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. Provided that the proposed conditional use, the operation of a commercial plant nursery (landscaping and horticultural services), is done in accordance with applicable laws and best management practices, this activity is not anticipated to have any negative effects upon any adjacent lands or interests. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including roads, police protection, solid waste disposal, water, sewer, drainage structures, parks, and mass transit; This intended uses of the subject property for a commercial pant nursery is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this '- ....,J March 12,2004 Page 3 Subject: Cheryl Ann Griffin File No.: CU-04-003 area. Any development will need to demonstrate that there are adequate public facilities in the area to support such development. It is not expected that the proposed business would significantly increase traffic along Orange Avenue. The applicants currently live and must continue to live on the subject property. 4. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed conditional use is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The site is currently being utilized for a single-family home. COMMENTS The applicants, Cheryl and Mark Griffin, have applied for the requested conditional use in order to operate a Landscaping & Horticultural Services (commercial plant nursery) business from the subject property. Landscaping and Horticultural Services are allowed as conditional uses in the AR-1 Zoning District subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. The applicants currently live and must continue to live on the subject site. Provided that the proposed conditional use, the operation of a commercial plant nursery (landscaping and horticultural services), is done in accordance with applicable laws and best management practices, this activity is not anticipated to have any negative effects upon any adjacent lands or interests. Staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. The applicants must continue to live on the subject property in order to allow the conditional use permit to remain in effect. 2. The applicant must retain a minimum 20-foot buffer along all property lines so as to not encroach on adjacent properties. 3. The removal of any native vegetation shall require a Vegetation Removal Permit issued by the Environmental Resources Division. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment hf cc: County Administrator County Attorney Cheryl and Mark Griffin File '-' ...",¡ Suggested motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested conditional use. MOTION TO APPROVE: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT APPROVAL TO THE APPLICATION OF CHERYL AND MARK GRIFFIN, FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE OPERATION OF A LANDSCAPING & HORTICULTRAL SERVICES (COMMERCIAL PLANT NURSERY) BUSINESS IN THE AR -1 (AGRICULTURAL, RESIDENTIAL - DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE... [LIST CONDITION(S)] MOTION TO DENY: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPLICATION OF CHERYL AND MARK GRIFFIN, FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE OPERATION OF A LANDSCAPING & HORTICUL TRAL SERVICES (COMMERCIAL PLANT NURSERY) BUSINESS IN THE AR -1 (AGRICULTURAL, RESIDENTIAL - DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE... [CITE REASON(S) WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC] '-' ....., D MARK GRIFFIN - FILE NO. CU-04-003: 1': , P . sting st . f comments, stated that Agenda Item # 6 was the application of Cheryl and Mark Griffin, for a Conditional Use Pennit to allow Landscaping & Horticultural Services (Commercial Plant Nursery) in the AR-I (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District for 4.27 acres of property located at 9290 Orange Avenue. Landscaping and Horticultural Services are allowed as conditional uses in the AR-l Zoning District subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. The applicants currently live and must continue to live on the subject site if the conditional use pennit is approved. Provided that the proposed conditional use is done in accordance with applicable laws and best management practices, this activity is not anticipated to have any negative effects upon any adjacent lands or interests. Staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in the Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, subject to three limiting conditions. 1. The applicants must continue to live on the subject property in order to allow the conditional use pennit to remain in effect. 2. The applicant must retain a minimum 20-foot buffer along all property lines so as to not encroach on adjacent properties. 3. The removal of any native vegetation shall require a Vegetation Removal Pennit issued by the Environmental Resources Division. Mr. Hearn questioned if a 20-foot buffer would be required on this project since it is a commercial use. Ms. Young confinned that would be correct since this is a commercial business. Mr. Hearn stated that the Land Development Code requires that an 8-foot fence also be required since it is a commercial business that adjoins or abuts a residential use. Ms. Young confinned that would be correct, unless the applicant receives signed waivers from the neighbors stating it is not necessary for them. Chainnan McCurdy questioned ifthe applicant was present. Mr. Mark Griffin stated that he was the applicant. He stated that there is a neighbor to the west of their property but north and South of the property there was not anyone. Ms. Young questioned if the applicant would have any non-residential structures on the property. Mr. Griffin stated that they would not. Ms. Young confinned that the 8-foot fence would not be a requirement then. Ms. Cheryl Griffin stated that they did not realize that they would need a conditional use pennit since there would not be any public entering the property on a regular basis. She P&Z / LPA Regular Meeting March 18, 2004 Page 13 of 21 - '-' """"" stated that they would be growing trees and shrubs to sell at flea markets. She also stated that they have had discussions with the neighbors about their proposed business and had no objections. Chairman McCurdy opened the public hearing. Seeing no one, Chairman McCurdy closed the public hearing. Mr. Lounds questioned if they could add a condition requiring the applicant to provide signed, notarized letters ftom their neighbors waiving the fence requirement prior to the Board of County Commissioners Meeting. Mr. Lounds stated that after considering the testimony presented during the public hearing, including staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in Section 11.06.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Motion seconded by Mr. Hearn. Upon a roll call vote the motion was approved P&Z / LP A Regular Meeting March 18, 2004 Page 14 of 21 ~ - \...- ....,¡ Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations E. AR-1 AGRICULTURAl. RESIDENTIAL - 1 ( '- 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for single-family dwellings at a maximum density of one (1 ) dwelling unit per gross acre, together with such other uses as may be necessary for and compatible with very low density rural residential surroundings. The number in "0" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02{B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Family day care homes. (999) b. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) notifies the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. (999) c. Single-family detached dwellings. (999) 3. Lot Size Requirements .----- Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations ( Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking Requirements Off-street parking requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.06.00. 6. Conditional Uses a. Crop services (072) b. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1 000) feet of another such family residential home. (999) c. Industrial wastewater disposal. (999) d. Kennels - completely enclosed. (0752) e. Landscaping & horticultural services (078) f. Retail: (1) Fruits and Vegetables. (543) g. Riding stables. (1999) ¡. h. Veterinary services, (074) Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999) 7. Accessory Uses .---- Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following: ~, Adopted August 1, 1990 101 Revised Through 08101/00 '-' ....,I Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations a. Agriculture (farms and ranches accessory to single-family detached dwelling). (01102) b. Animals. subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.03. (999) c. Guest house subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.04. (999) d. Mobile Home subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.05. (999) e. Retail and wholesale trade - subordinate to the primary authorized use or activity. ¡. Adopted August 1, 1990 102 Revised Through 08101/00 ~ ST,WCEaunv~NtD -~ PUIIUC___ -,..- 1OWHOMITW.Y~ N011CE ia...... ~ in___ willi ~ =-~~..~'"::":J.,~= _..... sa. Luci. CeoøoIy ~ --..---- ~~~~~ZoMng CHERYl. A. NtD _ S. -.....c.d- - --.. -..............- =,=::::-~= ..-- mAT JlMTOfll£ EASY IIØES Of 11£_ 10_ OF 11£ SOUTHEAST ONE QUM1ØI Of 1>E NœTÆAST ONE 0WIØ1BI OF SEe- noN '0. TOWNI'" 3Ii 101111\, -- . EAST. ST. LUCE CO LYING WIST OF 1>E FOLLOWING TIIACT FIIOII THE NORTIMUT THE SOUTHEAST ONE OIIMIØI OF ONE QUo1II. 1ER _ J1O,JI f&T FOIl 11£ C0N- TINUE EAST 10 SOUTH UIIE OUM· mt Of 11£ 10 A POINT__ CORNEll OF Of THE NOR_ WEST 111.1. fEET -. ~l2IOo.-.- ~...;.!:"~.:~~z.0:.3 :::~~=I: ..-.....--- LOTS .. TIIIOUGH .. AND LOTS 231H11OUGH 27. BLOCK 73. _TE CITY IUSOIYllION. Al:COIIIIIIIG TO THE !'LAT THEREOF. AS RE· =~TOf~~~~~ III\. 1OGE11ÐI LYING LOTS :It M AU£Y ItILDCK Ell wmt THAT POII"- ClDSEII~ .. MSMlTLUaE_ OF lAID aDCtC n. AS E ŒNCED IT IIESOLUTION IIDOK M7. _ _ OFlI£ OF Sf. LUaE aIUNIY. RaIl». ~"'3_-'_ PA11IICIA _ LOWE..... ~ Utt =:'::r'~,",~"'" -., Zaoiftg llitlrlet ,... 1M -.. .... -- 1IW:f3l1:LDTI,ILDCXJ.sø:noN ~_ SlIP 31 SOU11I.IWIOE to fAST.!'LAT NO. . ' STLUCIE_ __ TO 11£ I'LAT 11IEIEDF ItI'LAT IIDOK ....- :IS OF THE RECORDS OF IT LUCIE CDUIIT FL S ..1 fT SUIJECf 10 AN EAIEIØIT M:IIOSS THE E 31 f&T _NafTfOR_ UI1U1Y__ -- ~_._- -_....~-_..... _,.......__01...__ -'-"In"CG~_1 --.....--- - TAKE AS M PDItT Of _M IN1BI- ~ Of 1>E WESmtLY RIGHT Of WAY UNE OF STATE ROM A.A ANI) THE NORTH UNE Of IŒTTLES ISUIIIO AS _IN !'LAT IDOIt ... PAGE .. IT. LUCIE COUNTY. R-.__N22__rw ...-.MWESIIRlY_OFWAY UIIEOF A.AADlSTANCE OF3IiUII FEEt: __ S. DEGREES _ W A DISTANCE OF t31II ~?...::"~;~~::.': GREES _ W A DlSTNIŒ OF _11 ÆET; _ _ S'_ 3171' EAD1STANCE Of __ FEET; 1IElICE RUN I. ~ .'ZI'WADlSTANCE 01'_ fEEI'. MORE OR LESS TO TIE SNORE OF 11£ INDIAIt IU1IEII. THENŒ _DElI SOU11tEAStERLY ..._ M _ OFM _ _ ADllTANCE OF _ FEET MORE OR LESS 10 THE SAID _UllEOFNETTLES __ -- N n IJEGIIEES ....... E ALONG __ NORTH UNE OF NEnUS ISLNID A DlSTMCE OF ,334.IIOf&T MORE DR LESS 10 11£ PDltTOF _ SAID PARCEL COIII'AlNING ,0,1 oaES UORE OR LESS. ==:'=:'~\_0I PUIIUC_....._....".,-. ~~.::.~ 3nI=.SL.W. ~...__~,r= ~... . 7:IØ P.M. or _ ............ _ PUllSUMT1O_____ II._-..-,,~-- : ·'=--ctï:..-;i;~-== .. : ..... . ncerd of... prGCIÑII... and :: :-w:==:= :::r.=:.,=: ----..--- ---..-.......- LOCN..~ 112fC'('1UNMNG AIID_~ Sf, LUaE CCUNIY. FLOImA ISJ CW-1IaÞonIr. CIIoIn-. PUIUSH Øl\1E: _.._ - -.~..... ¡ . \ ~ \. \" _..' ,. , '_/ ...." // /'1 ,/ I . f <~ .~, l i'\ í ....'~ .),/ .~ tr 1)V f\...!t/ .\ ~ j ! Q ,,-Ctr h ,.,) /". #" "- ,: , '-' ...." - _'r.I:mI!llllAlM.W: ""- '. II.......G... BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ~=r .~eJeIE . -','-. COUNTY ~', F LOR I D A '-"". COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR .... March 5, 2004 In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that CHERYL A. AND MARK S. GRIFFIN, have petitioned St. Lucie County for a Conditional Use Permit to allow Landscaping and Horticultural Services in the AR-l (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) Zoning District for the following described property: Location: 9290 Orange A venue. THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AILABLE UPON REQUEST The fIrst public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on March 18, 2004, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing. County policy discourages communication with individual Planning and Zoning Commission and County Commission on any case outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or provide written comments for the record. The proceedings of the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross- examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462- 1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. Please call (772) 462-1960 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number: CU-04-003. Sincerely, ST. LUCIE COUNTY PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION · . ,OJ-.-" ,c / /f'':v~' l CCL"::Þt'Vì / /1 (C <--<>i d<-/ / I:~) ¿~1f-- Carson McCurdy, Chairman JOHN D, ßI',UHN, Districr NO.1. DOUG COWAI',D, District NO.2· PAULA A. LEWIS, District No. J . mANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No.4· CLIFF ßAI',NES, District NO.5 County Administrotor - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Administration: (772) 462-1590 · Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GISfTechnical Services: (772) 462-1553 Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 · Fox: (772) 462-1581 Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 · Fox: (772) 462-2132 WWW.co.st-lucie.fl.us '-' ..., ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow Landscaping and Horticultural Services 9290 Orange Avenue. Currently Zoned: AR·1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: ADril19.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE x I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): JAÞ1eç T: !1(ckÍJ¿ 9'3 0 ~'J Olè..AA,')(;e ~de Fr R~fL(~ F/ 3(¡995 Address: Date: !¡-¡J- 0 (j; Signed: f)~¿ '7,~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: (FILE NO. CU-04-003 - Cheryl and Mark Griffin) '-' 'wi ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Properly Located At: To allow Landscaping and Horticultural Services 9290 Orange Avenue. Currently Zoned: AR-1 (Agricultural, Residentlal- 1 du/acre) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and r y: ADril19.2004. PINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): NORTH ST. LUCIE RIVER WATER CONTROL DISTRICT 2721 g, JENKIr~5 HU. FT. PIERCE, FL 34981 Address: i' Date: ¿ I_.::s-{)~ Signed: Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be con Idered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: (FILE NO. CU-04-003 - Cheryl and Mark Griffin) '-' ....., ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: 9290 Orange Avenue. To allow Landscaping and Horticultural Services , , ,"/ Currently Zoned: AR-1 (Agricultural, Resldentlal- 1 duJacre) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Community Development Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: April 19.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE J I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name ) (Please Print): F'LOR\\)A QAS -rRANSY'\ \S9 tON COMPAÑV ("{=Gr- Address: R1CKf~"~ OEPA~"NT I I~"3\ 1.At'1~t29T., 9J1TE. ,,9> ,\tOUSTON, 'I)l 'I1ð1O ~_R~A't~9.-mþAt(S\1'l,gg,ON Date: APRil \(,."ZOO&\ Signed: Q.,_ - VJC~ .51" c:o~~ A"rfa~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: fQ1 ~S A t-\A"N\\AL GAQ 9\PtUNë 9~¥JfW' 1MAf~ A PœmON 6r nu: f\\OJ! Ð\:~&.t> i>~. 11't£ -reRtn~ ANn ~V'S\a19 01= TH"E ~£Nt QOtUtOENT 'l41\.L & \J~ TO ~\tŒ \A~~Otij~ Ft'Rt1JI1lID M'.:T1"4m£.ß ~\T~\N ~t W~R\'EG o~ ~E fA~. (FILE NO. CU-04-003 - Cheryl and Mark GriffIn) - --- ) " '-' -...J Agenda Request Item Number Date: 5D 05/04/04 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. ] [ ] [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD X] To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Growth Management Department terim SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 04-084 granting Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known as Johnston Lakes - PUD for property located on northwest corner of the intersection of Johnston Road and Indrio Road. BACKGROUND: Glassman Properties, Inc., has requested a planned unit development for 116 acres of land located generally at the northwest corner of the intersection of Johnston Road and Indrio Road. The stated purpose for the planned development is to develop the property for 359 Single Family Lots. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: At the March 25, 2004, public hearing on this matter, the S1. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 4 to 3 (Mr. Akins, Ms. Hammer, and Mr. Hearn) recommended approval of the requested Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known as Johnston Lakes - PUD. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-084. COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED D DENIED [=:=J OTHER Approved 5-0 Motion to approve to continue to June 15, 2004, 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter D u sM. Anderson h' b h d./ ounty Administrator t at It may e ear . Ý C d' t' / S' t ~ oor Ina Ion Igna ures II'" County Attorney : Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept.: ./ .- ~Other: Other: Finance: ~ '-'" '-" .' Commission Review: May 4, 2004 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Interim Growth Management Director DATE: April 28, 2004 SUBJECT: Application of Glassman Properties, LLC, for Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known as Johnston Lakes - PUD. LOCATION: Northwest corner of the intersection of Indrio Road and Johnston Road. Subject property surrounds the corner parcel. EXISTING ZONING: AG-1 (Agricultural-1 du/acre) PROPOSED ZONING: PUD (Planned Unit Development - Johnston Lakes) FUTURE LAND USE: MXD - Indrio Road (Mixed Use Development - Low Intensity Area) PARCEL SIZE: PROPOSED USE: PROPOSED DENSITY: SURROUNDING ZONING: 115.64 acres 359 single-family residential lots 3.1 dwelling units per acre AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) to the north, south, east, and west. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing land uses surrounding the property are agricultural and vacant. These properties are primarily citrus groves with several single-family houses. The Future Land Use Classification of the surrounding area is MXD - Indrio (Mixed Use Development) to the north, south, and west. RE (Residential Estate) is located to the east across Johnston Road. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #7 (4900 Ft. Pierce Boulevard), is located approximately 2 miles to the east. ~ -....I April 28, 2004 Page 2 Subject: Johnston Lakes File No,: RZ-03-017/PUD-03-011 UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property is in the St. Lucie County Utilities Department service area. At the present time no water or sewer service lines exist to the property. There are plans to extend trunk lines to this area. No building permits will be issued until utility services are available to this property. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way for Indrio Road is 123 feet. Additional right-of-way of 105 feet will be required tor Indrio Road. The existing right-of-way tor Johnston Road is 60 feet. No right-ot-way dedication is required along Johnston Road as Fort Pierce Farms Water Management District Canal No. 8 currently lies between this property and the road. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: No improvements to Indrio Road were included in the County's or Florida Department of Transportation's (FDOT's) Five-Year Work Programs. Developer funding may accelerate the needed improvements to Indrio Road. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Concurrency Deferral Affidavit. ************************************************************************* STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed change in zoning and petition for preliminary Planned Unit Development is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. There are a total of 359 single-family lots proposed in this development. If the subject property were to be developed at the maximum density allowable by the Future Land Use Classification ot MXD (Mixed Use - Indrio) - Low Intensity, 578 units would be possible at 5 dwelling units per acre. The site plan that is submitted as a part of this rezoning to PUD is consistent with the provisions of the Land Development Code. '-" ""'" April 28, 2004 Page 3 Subject: Johnston Lakes File No,; RZ-03-017/PUD-03-011 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the 51. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The proposed Johnston Lakes - PUD is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. Policy 1.1.1.1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes maximum residential densities for the MXD - Indrio (Mixed Use - Indrio) - Low Intensity _ Future Land Use Category as 5 dwelling units per 1 acre. The proposed project is to be developed with a maximum residential density of 3.1 units per acre, therefore, the proposed project is consistent with this policy. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The proposed change in zoning to PUD for the purpose of allowing the construction of a single-family residential development, may be consistent with the proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The gross density of the proposed PUD development is 3.1 du/acre, which is consistent with the future land use designation in this area. Surrounding properties are currently vacant. The whole area is under severe development pressure and is the subject of ongoing planning studies. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; There have not been changes that would require an amendment. The petitioned parcel has been designated with a Future Land Use Classification of MXD - Indrio (Mixed Use - Indrio Road) with a Low Intensity designation, which stipulates that the parcel may be developed up to 5 dwelling units per acre. The subject property is in an area that has seen increased interest in residential and non-residential development proposals. The site is located within the non- contiguous Urban Service Boundary located around the 1-95/lndrio Road interchange. Water and sewer services would be provided by an extension of the current St. Lucie County facilities. The developer has proposed constructing the needed infrastructure in the area in order to allow for the development of the project. 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; The proposed site plan, which is tied to this rezoning, is not expected to create any additional demands, which cannot be accommodated, on any public facilities in this area. The subject is located within the non-contiguous Urban Service Boundary located around the 1-95/lndrio Road interchange. Water and sewer ~ -...I April 28, 2004 Page 4 Subject: Johnston Lakes File No.: RZ-03-017/PUD-03-011 service is planned to be expanded to the site and would be provided by the St. Lucie County Utilities Department. Roadway capacities in the area are not adequate to meet the needs of the proposed development. The developer of the project will construct the needed roadway infrastructure at his own expense. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed change in zoning and development of this site as a residential planned unit development is not expected to result in any unaddressable environmental impact. As part of the planned unit development review process an environmental impact report has been submitted for review. The site has been cleared of native vegetation and has been used for a grove operation for many years. There are no wetlands or native vegetation remaining on site. 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; An orderly and logical development pattern may result with this change in zoning. The development is located in an area of several proposed subdivisions. The subject property is located within the non-contiguous Urban Service Boundary located around the 1-95/1ndrio Road interchange and may acquire adequate facilities to service the proposed project. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. COMMENTS The applicant, Glassman Properties, LLC, is proposing a residential development of 359 Single- Family Lots. This project is to be known as Johnston Lakes - PUD. As a Planned Unit Development, the project proposes to develop the subject property with some flexibility. Section 7.01.03(1) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that 35% of the site must consist of open space, a minimum of 15% of which must be native upland habitat preserved in its natural condition. The subject property does not have any native upland habitat to preserve. The proposed planned development maintains 35% (39.45 acres) of the project area in total open space. Lakes contain 22.21 acres, landscape area 15.14 acres, and a recreational area has 2.10 acres of land. The remainder of the project consists of those areas designated for residential development (buildings, roadway, driveways, and sidewalks). The applicant's Transportation Impact Report indicates that the proposed development project will create a situation where there will eventually be an unacceptable Level of Service for the roadway east of the intersection of Johnston and Indrio Roads. Improvements to this section '-' ....., April 28, 2004 Page 5 Subject: Johnston Lakes File No.: RZ-03-017/PUD-03-011 will be required in the future. The developer has indicated that he will construct some infrastructure improvements in order to facilitate the project and he will be donating 105 feet for the future right-of-way needs at this location. The main project entrance along Indrio Road may require signalization with the provision of right and left turn lanes into the project concurrent with the completion of the initial site work. At the March 25, 2004, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 4 to 3 (Mr. Akins, Ms. Hammer, and Mr. Hearn) recommended approval for the requested change in zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Johnston Lakes) Zoning District. Staff· is aware of the Board of County Commissioners concerns relative to development along the Indrio Road Corridor. On March 17, 2004, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) presented its preliminary findings subsequent to the charrette held to consider an overall master plan for this area. While the requested rezoning is consistent with the Indrio Road MXD designation, Staff is concerned that approval of zoning to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Johnston Lakes) Zoning District for this parcel may not be consistent with master plans for the entire area. Plans derived from the charrette may recommend a modified commercial configuration or some level of mixed use development. Staff has determined that the proposed zoning designation and the Preliminary Planned Unit Development site plan are compatible with the existing and proposed uses in the area at this time. This petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, subject to the following conditions: 1. No two adjoining homes shall have the same front architectural elevation. 2. Prior to final Planned Unit Development (PUD) for this project, the developers, their successors and assigns, shall have entered into an enforceable utility service agreement with St. Lucie County Utilities to ensure the provision of water and sewer services. This agreement shall be in a form consistent with St. Lucie County regulations regarding utility service extensions and service provisions. 3. The irrigation system within this project shall be designed to accept reuse water from the St. Lucie County Utilities as the preferred method of irrigation. 4. Prior to Final Planned Unit Development approval, the applicant shall provide documentation from FDOT stipulating the ultimate required right-of-way. In addition, the applicant shall modify the Final PUD plans to incorporate the required right-of-way and dedicate the required right-of-way for Indrio Road to the County or FDOT in a manner acceptable to the County Attorney. 5. The developer shall provide right and left turn lanes at all entries on Indrio and Johnston Roads. '-'" ,..., April 28, 2004 Page 6 Subject: Johnston Lakes File No.: RZ-03-017/PUD-03-011 6. The developer shall provide adequate site lighting at the intersection of the Johnston Lakes development project entrance and Indrio Road. The lighting shall be installed utilizing acceptable Engineering Safety Standards. 7. Prior to the issuance of any land clearing permits for the Johnston Lakes development, the developers shall clearly delineate all areas to be preserved and/or protected. Delineation shall be either the placing of silt fencing, safety fencing or similar type of materials. Flagging shall not be used except as a guide for the installation of the fencing materials. All land clearing activities shall be in accordance to the specific conditions/standards outlined in the Land Clearing Permit. 8. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the first residential unit, the developer shall provide a concrete sidewalk, having a minimum of eight feet, along the western side of Johnston Road and the northern side of Indrio Road, from the northern project limits to the southern project limits. 9. When warranted, the developer shall pay the cost of a traffic signal at the intersection of Indrio Road and Johnston Road, including all required lane adjustments. Prior to the issuance of final development approval, an enforceable agreement shall be entered into identifying how and when signalization will be installed. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-084, which would grant preliminary planned unit development approval. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. SUBMITTED: hf cc: Lindsey Walter County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director File ~ ...",¡ Exhibit A Maps · General Location Map · Area Subject to the Final Planned Unit Development Approval · Certificate of Capacity File No.: RZ-03-017/PUD-03-011 May 4, 2004 Resolution 04-084 Page 5 '-'" ..,¡ RESOLUTION 04-084 FILE NO: RZ-Q3-Q17/PUD-Q3-Q11 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. The petitioner is proposing the construction of 359 single-family homes for 116 acres of property located generally at the northwest corner of the intersection of Indrio Road and Johnston Road. 2. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet minimum technical requirements. 3. On March 25, 2004, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and recommended to this Board that Preliminary Development Plan approval for the project to be known as Johnston Lakes be granted. 4. On May 4,2004, the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and granted Preliminary Development Plan approval for the project to be known Johnston Lakes. 5. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 6. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. 7. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping, and screening. File No.: RZ-03-017/PUD-03-011 May 4, 2004 Resolution 04-084 Page 1 - "--' ...., 8. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicabJe district regulations. 9. The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Final Site Plan for the project to be known as Johnston Lakes - - A Planned Unit Development be, and the same is hereby approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Kilday & Associates, Inc., dated January 20,2004, and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Community Development Director on January 20,2004, for the property described below, subject to the following conditions: 1. No two adjoining homes shall have the same front architectural elevation. 2. Prior to final Planned Unit Development (PUD) for this project, the developers, their successors and assigns, shall have entered into an enforceable utility service agreement with St. Lucie County Utilities to ensure the provision of water and sewer services. This agreement shall be in a form consistent with St. Lucie County regulations regarding utility service extensions and service provisions. 3. The irrigation system within this project shall be designed to accept reuse water from the St. Lucie County Utilities as the preferred method of irrigation. 4. Prior to Final Planned Unit Development approval, the applicant shall provide documentation from FDOT stipulating the ultimate required right-of- way. In addition, the applicant shall modify the Final PUD plans to incorporate the required right-of-way and dedicate the required right-of-way for Indrio Road to the County or FDOT in a manner acceptable to the County Attorney. 5. The developer shall provide right and left turn lanes at all entries on Indrio and Johnston Roads. 6. The developer shall provide adequate site lighting at the intersection of the Johnston Lakes development project entrance and Indrio Road. The lighting shall be installed utilizing acceptable Engineering Safety Standards. File No.: RZ-03-017/PUD-03-011 May 4, 2004 Resolution 04-084 Page 2 '-' ...,; 7. Prior to the issuance of any land clearing permits for the Johnston Lakes development, the developers shall clearly delineate all areas to be preserved and/or protected. Delineation shall be either the placing of silt fencing, safety fencing or similar type of materials. Flagging shall not be used except as a guide for the installation of the fencing materials. All land clearing activities shall be in accordance to the specific conditions/standards outlined in the Land Clearing Permit. 8. Prior to the issuance of the Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the first residential unit, the developer shall provide a concrete sidewalk, having a minimum of eight feet, along the western side of Johnston Road and the northern side of Indrio Road, from the northern project limits to the southern project limits. 9. When warranted, the developer shall pay the cost of a traffic signal at the intersection of Indrio Road and Johnston Road, including all required lane adjustments. Prior to the issuance of final development approval, an enforceable agreement shall be entered into identifying how and when signalization will be installed. 2. The property on which this Preliminary Planned Unit Development Site Plan approval is granted is described as follows: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREEES, 54 MINUTES, 25 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES, 31 MINUTES, 44 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 124.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00 DEGREES, 31 MINUTES, 44 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 1113.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES, 54 MINUTES, 25 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 1295.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES, 31 MINUTES, 44 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 1113.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES, 54 MINUTES, 25 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1295.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (Location: Northwest corner of the intersection of Indrio Road and Johnston Road) C. This Preliminary Planned Unit Development Site Plan approval shall expire on May 4,2006, unless an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(8)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code or final planned unit development approval has been granted. File No.: RZ-03-017/PUD-03-011 May 4, 2004 Resolution 04-084 Page 3 - --- "'" ...,./ D. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Growth Management Director on May 4, 2004. E. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Section A, which plan shall be placed on file with the S1. Lucie Growth Management Director. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis xxx XXX XXX Vice-Chairman John D. Bruhn Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 4th Day of May 2004. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney hf H:\ W ORD\Petitions\BCC\F I N I SH EO. 04 \Johnston LakesPre PO. PD\Johnston LakesPrePO- RES .doc File No.: RZ-03-017/PUO-03-011 May 4,2004 Resolution 04-084 Page 4 - - ~ ....., d:ti.;;'"1L~~K~~Jf:'~~CIÆ"_~~lRnl;lI ~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ~=r. ~eJ t:1 E - -~.~.,~ COUNTY ¡; F LOR I D A ' ..":". r___¡¡ IIHRJ'JiI L 1¡¡¡¡1S&t:L_>~ ä ~~~ COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR April 23, 2004 In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that GLASSMAN PROPERTIES, LLC.., has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from the AG-l (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Johnston Lakes) Zoning District for the following described property: Location: Northwest corner of the intersection of Johnston Road and Indrio Road. THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AILABLE UPON REQUEST The second public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on May 4, 2004, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing. County policy discourages communication with individual County Commissioners on any case outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or provide written comments for the record. The proceedings of the County Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the County Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462- 1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. Please call (772) 462-1580 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number RZ-03-017. Sincerely, ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ~ -- c¿,:J - / / a-d~-c (0~t:-¿~~) / .c~/t ;7 Paula Lewis, Chair JOHN D. ßRUHN, Districr No.1· DOUG COWARD, Disrricr No.2· PAULA A. LEWIS, Disrricr No. J . mANNIE HUTCHINSON, Disrricr No.4. CLIFF ßARNES, Disrricr No.5 Counry Adminisrroror - Douglas M. Anderson 2.300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce. FL .34982-5652 Administration: (772) 462-1590 · Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GISffechnical SeNices: (772) 462-155.3 Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 . Fax: (772) 462-1581 Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 · Fax: (772) 462-21.32 WWW.co.st-lucie.fl.us u~mmC~AL- SUBJECT TO PiLANNJNG & ZONlNl AGENDA ITEM 2: Glassman Properties. LLC. - File No. RZ.03.017IPUD"~ION APPROVAl \.-; ~ Mr. Hank Flores, presenting Staff comments, stated that Agenda Item # 2 was the application of Glassman Properties, LLC, for a Change in Zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development _ Johnston Lakes) Zoning District for 116 acres of property located at the Northwest comer of the intersection of Indrio Road and Johnston Road. He continued that the subject property surrounds the comer parcel and has a proposed density of 3.1 dwelling units per acre. Mr. Flores continued that the applicant, Glassman Properties, is proposing a residential development of 359 Single-Family Lots for the project known as Johnston Lakes - PUD. The subject property does not have any native upland habitat subject to preservation. The proposed planned development maintains 35% (39.45 acres) of the project area in total open space with 22.21 acres of lakes, 15.14 acres of landscaping, and 2.1 acres of recreational area. The remainder of the project consists of those areas designated for residential development (buildings, roadway, driveways, and sidewalks). Mr. Flores stated that the applicant's Transportation Impact Report indicates that the proposed development project will create a situation where there will eventually be an unacceptable Level of Service for the roadway east of the intersection of Johnston and Indrio Roads. Improvements to this section will be required in the future. The developer has indicated that he will construct some infrastructure improvements in order to facilitate the project and he will be donating property for future right-of-way needs at this location. The main project entrance along Indrio Road may at some point require signalization with the provision of right and left turn lanes into the project concurrent with the completion of the initial site work. There is no set timetable for the availability of water and sewer service. Staff has determined that based solely on the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03, the proposed zoning designation and the Preliminary Planned Unit Development site plan are compatible with the existing and proposed uses in the area and the petition meets the standards of review as set forth in the Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff is recommending that this board forward a recommendation of approval to the Board of County Commissioners. Chairman McCurdy questioned if the unacceptable level of service was pre-existing or would become unacceptable because of this proposed project. Mr. Flores stated that it would become unacceptable because of this project. Chairman McCurdy questioned if trunk lines would be necessary for the applicant to develop the site. Mr. Flores stated that they could have a package plant on property, but could not have well or septic. Mr. Akins stated that there are already existing water and sewer problems with Holiday Pines in that area because of Portofino Shores and questioned what the source of this projects water would be. Mr. Flores stated that they are relying solely on the extension of P&Z / LPA Special Meeting March 25, 2004 Page 5 of 15 UNomCIAL- SUBJECT TO PLANNING & lONI. COMMISSION APPROVAL the water and sewer lines. Ms. Hensley questioned if this plan was inconsistent with the proposed master plan for the area. ~ ...I Ms. Hammer questioned how long the AG-l (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) zoning was on this property. Mr. Kelly stated that it was at least since 1990 and possibly even before that. Ms. Heather Young stated that she received an email from Mr. Grande with comments regarding this application that he would like to have on record. See his email attached as Exhibit A. Chairman McCurdy questioned if the applicant was present. Mr. Kieran Kilday, Kilday and Associates, stated that he was representing the petitioner. He stated that the property is already within the Urban Service Boundary in an area designated MXD-Low Intensity. He continued that this land use category permits residential development up to 5 units per acre in density. He stated that their proposed plan has an approximate density of 3 units per acre. He continued that originally utilities were going to be provided as part of their development agreement by extending the trunk lines. He advised that due to impact of Portofino Shores the County has negotiated with FPUA (Fort Pierce Utilities Authority) to provide the service through extending their lines. He stated that they would be entering into an agreement to pay for those extensions. He also stated that this project would generate approximately 3600 trips with some on Indrio Road and some on Johnston Road. He advised that they would be dedicating ultimate right-of-way and turn lanes at the primary entrance on Indrio Road. He stated that the proposed development would have 358 single-family units and access off of Indrio Road as well. Ms. Hammer questioned the lot size. Mr. Kilday stated that they are an average of 52x120. Mr. Hearn questioned if this request would be increasing the density. Mr. Kilday stated that under the Future Land Use it was below the allowed density of 5 units per acre because their plan averaged 3 units per acre. Chairman McCurdy opened the public hearing. Mr. Bob Bangert, Holiday Pines, stated that $270,000 was paid for the Charrette. He continued that changes to the Comprehensive Plan must be made in order for the proposed Master Plan to work. He stated that these projects should be required to have the proper infrastructure before they are approved. He continued that he is concerned about fire and police protection as well. He stated that he didn't think this should be approved until the Comprehensive Plan is updated to incorporate the proposed changes of the Master Plan that was created out of the North County Charrette. Mr. Kevin Stinnette, Indian River Keeper, stated that he has been a part of the Comprehensive Plan Study Group. He stated that the North County Charrette has a good vision for how the area should be developed. He continued that the Board of County Commissioners directed Staff to make any changes necessary. He advised that the applicant, to accommodate the proposed changes, modified this plan but still is not consistent with the Greenways and Trails idea. He requested that they wait to vote on this request until everything is modified and the North County Master Plan is in place. P&Z I LPA Special Meeting March 25, 2004 Page 6 of 15 - "-' '-tI UNOFFIClAl- SUBJECT TO PlANKING & zo"- COMM\SS\ON APPROVAL Seeing no one else, Chairman McCurdy closed the public hearing. Ms. Hammer stated that she has a serious problem with changing the zoning from a maximum of 115 units to allow for 345 homes. She stated that the schools are in trouble without this proposed plan. She advised that they need 16 more in the next 20 years already. She continued that she attending the North County Charrette and heard the residents say that they did not want to increase densities in that area any more. Ms. Hensley requested that we be cautious with this request because they are currently at less than 1/2 the available facilities to meet the needs and this will only make it worse. Mr. Hearn stated that he feels the existing zoning is sufficient. He continued that he understands that the future land use allows for a higher density, but that he is not sure that the future is necessarily now and cannot support because of the results of the North County Charrette. He also stated that there was no obligation to grant future land use densities to an applicant, only the zoning density. He stated that he feels a development should pay for itself. Mr. Lounds questioned what the impact fees would be on this property. Mr. Flores stated that it would be approximately $6,500 per unit. Mr. Lounds stated that he feels this is within the applicant's rights because it is located within the Urban Service Boundary and that it should be moved on to the Board of County Commissioners for their decision. Mr. Akins stated that he did not feel this should be rushed through and it should wait until the finalized results of the North County Charrette. Ms. Noreen Dryer, the applicant's representative, stated that Chapter 163 of Florida Statutes states that the Comprehensive Plan is basically the Constitution and should take precedent over the Land Development Code and that these requests should be consistent with that. She stated that North County Charrette results were not a law. She also stated that the applicant has modified their plan to adapt it to the Charrette's suggested ideas. She stated that agriculture is not viable in that area any longer and that they are not going to the maximum density allowed under the Future Land Use. She asked that they approve the applicant's request. Mr. Merritt stated that after considering the testimony present during the public hearing, including Staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in Section 11.06.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the S1. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to the application of Glassman Properties, LLC., for a Change in Zoning from the AG-l (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Johnston Lakes) Zoning District because it fits within the Urban Service Boundary and the Development Code. Motion seconded by Ms. Morgan. P&Z I LPA Special Meeting March 25, 2004 Page 7 of 15 \c.¡ UNOFFICIAL- ,.." ......, SUBJECT TO PLANNING & lONlNl COMMISSION APPROVAL Upon a roll call vote the motion was approved with a vote of 4-3 (Mr. Akins, Mr. Hearn, and Ms. Hammer voting against) and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. P&Z / LPA Special Meeting March 25, 2004 Page 8 of 15 \.,., E)(~ :', j -\- \\ A " '-' Page 1 of 2 David P Kelly - Tonight's agenda items From: To: Date: Subject: cc: "Charles Grande" <ChasGrande@msn.com> "David P Kelly" <DA VIDK@co.st-lucie.fl.us>, "David P Kelly" <DA VIDK@stlucieco.gov> 3/25/2004 4:43 PM Tonight's agenda items "Heather Young" <HEATHERY@stlucieco.gov>, "Heather Young" <HEATHERY@co.st- lucie.fl.us> David: r will not be able to be there tonight. Both Emily and I have had some kind of bug since the weekend and nobody should be in the same room with me. I did let Dawn know as soon as I knew. That said, the following is offered from someone who will not be hearing the applications and I do not believe it violates any rules or ethics. I did check with Heather and she thought this would be the best way for me to provide any questions or input that I had. Agenda Item 2. Glassman - This application is a really unfortunate at this time. I think they are trying to play on every technicality they can come up with. They want more than triple the current density in spite of the North County Charrette (NCC) recommendation that density shouJd not be given away. I expect they will try everything possible to assert that they comply with the charrette but, if Glassman gets approved, the North County charrette report will be worthless. Also, they will try to use the special district created to supply urban services for interchange related development to state that they are inside "an" urban service boundary. More nonsense. That was never the intent of that special district. Also, they will try to picture the "Future Land Use" maximum as an entitlement. I still have a picture in my mind of Bobby K. gesturing wildly that liThe future is now". How sad. r think this is the most important test since Emerson Estates and should be stopped at this point. The alternative is exactly the sprawl example presented during the charette. I was dumb enough to fall for the "sweet" Kosar presentation and I will be the first to admit I made a big mistake. I would expect that, with all of the facts coming to light, the CCOM will fix our error and it would be a real shame if we did it to them again with Glassman. Agenda Item 3. I would add a condition that II Any lighting visible from the Grove housing subdivision will be shieJded so the lighting source is not visible from the Grove". file://C:\Temp\GW}OOOOl.HTM 4/27/2004 "-' - E~~· ~ì+ "A " "'" Page 2 of 2 Agenda Item 5. I must admit that I am against allowing the sale of fire works within the county and I believe that there are sufficient legal sources in the counties to the north and south of us that I would rather see an ordinance banning their sale here. Note - I wonder how the current Sky King structure on USl in PSL was approved? That said, if it is to be approved, if we want the 1000 foot separation indicated in 7.10.25 1, the phrase "main entrance" should be changed to "nearest structural component" everywhere it appears. Otherwise we could have a fireworks store and a church much, much closer if they are big enough and back to back. Also, the applicable sections should be changed so that new gas stations, private schools, ...etc. cannot be located within 1,000 feet of an existing fireworks retail store. 7. Container Height - This seems to be really well meaning. What are the remedies for non-compliance. I'm not sure the standard remedy structure available to code enforcement is sufficient as a deterrent. If ever there was a need for specific remedies to be spelled out with increasing severity based on number of occurrences and magnitude of non- compliance, I think this is it. Love, Chas file://C:\Temp\GW } 0000 1.HTM 4/27/2004 0 '-' -.J -.J ...,. z - ~! (/) Q) L I"- Q) or- 0.. 0 J' j ¡ 0 I ~ cry 0... 0 ~ ¡if II c N c, '" a: 0 ~ I E \ C, , (/) (/) '" CD a: e - \ -\ ~ ... J: ~ ::J 0 Ü I -- I I OWOI' :iIøiIiIIíiOI1 a: I W iil CIfGI ,.,.., .3GW. > C ! ã: II I ... +--'0 0., 0,- Š' CII_1YJIII CD Q)+--' I '" .. a: . -- (\j I: _01_ otOo 110£-" Z 0° « ~O 15 þz·J "n.,,, ~ CL--1 ~ Z ::J o _ .í· :iIìmi ü z ... ¡:::: ~ ~ a: :::2: S S[ .L VN .. '" !II .. ... I tift' .. '" a: ~ a: s þ[ .L S 9[ .L , ~ AlNno:::> 3380H:::>33>tO '--' --' A Petition of Glassman Properties, LLC for a Change in Zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural-1 dulacre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development- Johnston Lakes Zonin District. ó z Õ c o U «I Ó z õ c o U n I") o If en Road Conal No. 1 ó z c Õ c o U RZ 03-017 r / / / / /j This pattern indicates rLL:'LLLj subject parcel .9;-..L~ a,~ GIS ~,._...=. Map prepared September 4, 2003 ¡ This maø hu been complied tor generlf planning and ,tferenoe PLI'ØOMI cßt· N 'M'1i1e wtty effort hu bien FMde 10 prCNidI the molt anent and 8CC:UIIIe Inlormlltion poaibIe,." noI ~ tor UIII II . Iegd¡ binding document. "-' ...., Zonin Glassman Pro erties, LLC ci z Õ c o u co ci z õ c o u on o 10 I If) (Pending- CG zoning) 4 Road Conal No. 1 ci z Õ c c o u Map prepared September 4, 2003 I RZ 03-017 r / / / / /j This pattern indicates rLLLLL.J subject parcel x-..L~ &'~, GIS =""--,,...:;Þ... TN, map hu been ~ for general p¡.nn¡ng and r.ference pwpo&8I only N 'tttIiIe fItIflI1Y effort ha been m8dt to pra.tiØø the most current and acc:urate intorm8Iíon poaaIbIe, It it not Intended for UN .. . IegaIy binding document '- ...." Land Use Glassman Pro erties, LLC o z Õ c o u RE CIO o z Õ c o u n MXD Indrio R RZ 03-017 r / / / / /j This pattern indicates rLLLLLj subject parcel Road Conol No. 1 RE o z Õ c o u ~..L~~~ GIS 7'~.:'=. Map prepared September 4, 2003 t Thi, map I'\aa been compIIM:t lor general planning and reletenee JUI'pOIeI only N WhIle wet"¡ effort * been n.œ to provide the molt cunn and .:aJ/'8te informlltlon poNitMe, It" not Intended few UI8 .. . legal')' binding document '- ...., Glassman Properties, LLC .' ~ if -"HI:............-.."""'I'm!JP! ,:...' -:/. .: .. . . ~ . . f , '. ¡ 'I,: I f ... . ., ,I' : RZ 03-017 r / / / / /J This pattern indicates ~..LJ subject parcel 5k-~~~~ GJ~ "7 ~~ Map prepared September 4, 2003 f -_..--.-..--.---~, N ... ..,....... ..... ... .. ....... .. _a.n_ __ --......-..--.IoQoIIr-.- \..... ......, ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA May 4, 2004 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and in accordance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. Lucie County Board of Commissioners consider their following requests: @ @ STEPHAN ROSS, for a Conditional Use warehousing and storage mini-warehouses Pierce) in the CG (Commercial, General) described property: Permit to allow household goods (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Zoning District for the following WHITE CITY SID 10 36 40 N 1/2 OF LOT 259 - LESS CANAL RIW (4.24 AC.) Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No. 1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) GLASSMAN PROPERTIES, LLC., for a Change in Zoning from the AG-l (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Johnston Lakes) Zoning District for the following described property: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREEES, 54 MINUTES, 25 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES, 31 MINUTES, 44 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 124.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00 DEGREES, 31 MINUTES, 44 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 1113.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES, 54 MINUTES, 25 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 1295.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES, 31 MINUTES, 44 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 1113.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DEGREES, 54 MINUTES, 25 SECONDS WEST, A DISTANCE OF 1295.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. Locatior: Road. Northwest corner of the intersection of Johnston Road and Indrio PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the Commission Chambers, Roger Poitras Annex, 3rd Floor, St. Lucie County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on May 4, 2004, beginning at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ISI Paula Lewis, CHAIR PUBLISH DATE: April 24, 2004 '- 'oJ Planning and Zoning Commission Review: 03/18/04 File Number RZ-03-012 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Planning Manager ~ DATE: March 12,2004 SUBJECT: Application of Glassman Properties, LLC, for a Change in Zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Johnston Lakes) Zoning District. LOCATION: Northwest corner of the intersection of Indrio Road and Johnston Road. Subject property surrounds the corner parcel. EXISTING ZONING: AG-1 (Agricultural-1 du/acre) PROPOSED ZONING: PUD (Planned Unit Development - Johnston Lakes) FUTURE LAND USE: MXD - Indrio Road (Mixed Use Development - Low Intensity Area) PARCEL SIZE: 115.64 acres PROPOSED USE: PROPOSED DENSITY: SURROUNDING ZONING: 359 single-family residential lots 3.1 dwelling units per acre AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) to the north, south, east, and west. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing land uses surrounding the property are agricultural and vacant. These properties are primarily citrus groves with several single-family houses. The Future Land Use Classification of the surrounding area is MXD - Indrio (Mixed Use Development) to the north, south, and west. RE (Residential Estate) is located to the east across Johnston Road. '-' ....., March 12, 2004 Page 2 Subject: Glassman Properties, LLC File No.: RZ-03-017/PUD-03-011 FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #7 (4900 Ft. Pierce Boulevard), is located approximately 2 miles to the east. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property is in the St. Lucie County Utilities Department service area. At the present time no water or sewer service lines exist to the property. There are plans to extend trunk lines to this area. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way for Indrio Road is 123 feet. Additional right-of-way of 105 feet will be required for Indrio Road. The existing right-of-way for Johnston Road is 60 feet. No right-of-way dedication is required along Johnston Road as Fort Pierce Farms Water Management District Canal No. 8 currently lies between this property and the road. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: No improvements to Indrio Road were included in the County's or Florida Department of Transportation's (FDOT's) Five-Year Work Programs. Developer funding may accelerate the needed improvements to Indrio Road. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Concurrency Deferral Affidavit. ************************************************************************* STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed change in zoning and petition for preliminary Planned Unit Development is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. There are a total of 359 single-family lots proposed in this development. If the subject property were to be developed at the maximum density allowable by the Future Land Use Classification of MXD (Mixed Use - Indrio) - Low Intensity, 578 units would be possible at 5 dwelling units per acre. The site plan that is submitted as a part of this rezoning to PUD is consistent with the provisions of the Land Development Code. '- ~ March 12, 2004 Page 3 Subject: Glassman Properties, LLC File No,: RZ-03-017/PUD-03-011 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The proposed Johnston Lakes - PUD is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. Policy 1.1.1.1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes maximum residential densities for the MXD - Indrio (Mixed Use - Indrio) - Low Intensity - Future Land Use Category as 5 dwelling units per 1 acre. The proposed project is to be developed with a maximum residential density of 3.1 units per acre, therefore, the proposed project is consistent with this policy. Policy 1.1.9.4 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes regulations providing that existing on-site native upland habitat be incorporated into required site plans as a part of open space areas, required landscaping, or as a part of minimum yard areas, as is practicable, is maintained. The proposed project has no native habitat remaining on it as the property has been utilized for a grove operation. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The proposed change in zoning to PUD for the purpose of allowing the construction of a single-family residential development, may be consistent with the proposed land uses in the surrounding area. The gross density of the proposed PUD development is 3.1 du/acre, which is consistent with the future land use designation in this area. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; There have not been changes that would require an amendment. The petitioned parcel has been designated with a Future Land Use Classification of MXD - Indrio (Mixed Use - Indrio Road) with a Low Intensity designation, which stipulates that the parcel may be developed up to 5 dwelling units per acre. The subject property is in an area that has seen increased interest in residential and non-residential development proposals. The site is located within the Urban Service Boundary of 8t. Lucie County. Water and sewer services would be provided by an extension of the current St. Lucie County facilities. The developer has proposed constructing the needed infrastructure in the area in order to allow for the development of the project. 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; '- ....., March 12. 2004 Page 4 Subject: Glassman Properties, LLC File No.: RZ-03-017/PUD-03-011 The proposed site plan, which is tied to this rezoning is not expected to create additional demands on any public facilities in this area. The subject property is located within the Urban Service Boundary of St. Lucie County. Water and sewer service is planned to be expanded to the site and would be provided by the St. Lucie County Utilities Department. Roadway capacities in the area are not adequate to meet the needs of the proposed development The developer of the project will construct the needed roadway infrastructure at his own expense. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed change in zoning and development of this site as a residential planned unit development is not expected to result in any unaddressable environmental impact. As part of the planned unit development review process an environmental impact report has been submitted for review. The site has been cleared of native vegetation and has been used for a grove operation for many years. There are no wetlands or native vegetation remaining on site. 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; An orderly and logical development pattern may result with this change in zoning. The development is located in an area of several proposed subdivisions. The subject property is within the Urban Service Boundary of St. Lucie County and may acquire adequate facilities to service the proposed project. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. COMMENTS The applicant, Glassman Properties, LLC, is proposing a residential development of 359 Single-Family Lots. This project is to be known as Johnston Lakes - PUD. As a Planned Unit Development, the project proposes to develop the subject property with some flexibility. Section 7.01.03(1) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that 35% of the site must consist of open space, a minimum of 15% of which must be native upland habitat preserved in its natural condition. The subject property does not have any native upland habitat to preserve. The proposed planned development maintains 35% (39.45 acres) of the project area in total open space. Lakes contain 22.21 acres, landscape area 15.14 acres, and a recreational area has 2.10 acres of land. The remainder of the project consists of those areas designated for residential development (buildings, roadway, driveways, and sidewalks). '- ...., March 12,2004 Page 5 Subject: Glassman Properties, LLC File No.: RZ-03-017/PUD-03-011 The applicant's Transportation Impact Report indicates that the proposed development project will create a situation where there will eventually be an unacceptable Level of Service for the roadway east of the intersection of Johnston and Indrio Roads. Improvements to this section will be required in the future. The developer has indicated that he will construct some infrastructure improvements in order to facilitate the project and he will be donating 105 feet for the future right-of-way needs at this location. The main project entrance along Indrio Road may require signalization with the provision of right and left turn lanes into the project concurrent with the completion of the initial site work. Staff has determined that the proposed zoning designation and the Preliminary Planned Unit Development site plan are compatible with the existing and proposed uses in the area. This petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff is aware of the Board of County Commissioners concerns relative to development along the Indrio Road Corridor. On March 17, 2004, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council (TCRPC) is scheduled to present its preliminary findings subsequent to the charrette held to consider an overall master plan for this area. Based solely upon the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03, staff finds that the Planning and Zoning Commission can forward a recommendation of approval to the Board of County Commissioners. While the requested rezoning is consistent with the Indrio Road MXD designation, Staff is concerned that approval of zoning to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Johnston Lakes) Zoning District for this parcel may not be consistent with master plans for the entire area. Plans derived from the charrette may recommend a modified commercial configuration or some level of mixed use development. Staff recommends that this petition be continued until the March 25, 2004, Planning and Zoning Commission meeting to allow for reaction to the TCRPC report. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment hf cc: County Administrator County Attorney Lindsey Walter Noreen Dreyer, Esq. File '-' ~ Suggested motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested change in zoning. MOTION TO APPROVE: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT APPROVAL TO THE APPLICATION OF GLASSMAN PROPERTIES, LLC, FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE AG-1 (AGRICULTURAL - 1 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - JOHNSTON LAKES) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE .... [CITE REASON[S] WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]. MOTION TO DENY: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPLICATION OF GLASSMAN PROPERTIES, LLC, FOR A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE AG-1 (AGRICULTURAL - 1 DUlACRE) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT - JOHNSTON LAKES) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE.... [CITE REASON[S] WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC]. .'-' "'-" Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations 3.01.03 ZONING DISTRICTS A. AG-1 AGRICULTURAL - 1 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for productive commercial agriculture, together with such other uses as may be necessary to and compatible with productive agricultural surroundings. Residential densities are restricted to a maximum of one (1) dwelling unit per gross acre. The number in ·0· following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this Code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Agricultural production - crops (01) b. Agricultural production -livestock & animal specialties (02) c. Agricultural services (07) d. Family day care homes. (999) e. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1,000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) notifies the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. (999) f. Fishing, hunting & trapping (09) g. Forestry (08) h. Kennels. (0752) i. Research Facilities, Noncommercial (8733) j. Riding stables. (7999) k. Single-family detached dwellings. (999) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. 6. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00. 7. Conditional Uses a. Agricultural labor housing. (999) Adopted August 1, 1990 94 Revised Tlvough 08101/00 '-" ....." Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations ¡ .. b. Aircfé..' storage and equipment maintenance. (4581) c. Airports and flying, landing, and takeoff fields. (4581) d. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1,OOO) feet of another such family residential home. (999) e. Farm products warehousing and storage. (4221/4222) f. Gasoline service stations. (5541) g. Industrial wastewater disposal. (999) h. Manufacturing: (1 ) Agricultural chemicals (287) (2) Food & kindred products (20) (3) Lumber & wood products, except furniture (24) i. Mining and quarrying of nonmetalic minerals, except fuels. (14) j. Retail trade: , (1) Farm equipment and related accessories, (999) (2) Apparel & accessory stores. (58) k. Sewage disposal subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.13. (999) I. Telecommunication Towers· subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999) m. Camps - sporting and recreational. (7032) 8. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following: a. b. c. Mobile homes subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.05. Retail trade and wholesale trade· subordinate to the primary authorized use or activity. Guest house subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.04. (1199) ( Adopted August 1. 1990 95 Revised Through 08101/00 '-' ~ CHAPTER VII DEVELOPMENT DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 7.00.00 GENERAL PROVISIONS 7.00.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Chapter is to provide development design and improvement standards applicable to development activity in the unincorporated area of the County. 7.01.00 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 7.01.01 PURPOSE The Planned Unit Development (PUD) District is intended to achieve residential land development of superior quality through the encouragement of flexibility and creativity in design options that: A. permit creative approaches to the development of residential land reflecting changes in the technology of land development; 8. allow for the efficient use of land, which can result in smaller networks of utilities and streets and thereby lower development costs; C, allow design options that encourage an environment of stable character, compatible with surrounding land uses; and D. permit the enhancement of neighborhoods through the preservation of natural features, the provision of underground utilities, and the provision of recreation areas and open space. 7.01.02 AUTHORIZED USES A. PERMITTED USES Any permitted, conditional or accessory use in the Agricultural-1 (AG-1); Agricultural-2.5 (AG-2.5); Agricultural-5 (AG-5); ResidentiaUConservation in the Agricultural-1 (AG-1); Agricultural-2.5 (AG-2.5); Agricultural-5"{AG-5); Residential/Conservation (RC); Residential, Estate-1 (RE-1); Residential, Estate-2 (RE-2); . ResidentiaJ, Single-Family-2 (RS-2); Residential, - Single-Family-3 (RS-3); Residential, Single-Family-4 (RS-4); Residêntial, MultipJe-FamiIy-5 (RM-5); Residential, Mobile Home- 5 (RMH-5); Residential, Multiple-Family-7 (RM-7); Residential, Multiple-Family-9 (RM-9); Residential, Multiple-Family-11 (RM-11); and Residential, Multiple-Family-15 (RM-15) zoning districts of this Code may be permitted in a Planned Unit Development District subject to complying with the residential densities described in Section 7.01.03(8). Adopted August 1,1990 375 Revised Through 08101/00 ~ ....., Section 7.01.00 Planned Unit Development ( B. NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT USES Uses of the types permitted in the Commercial, Neighborhood (CN) District are also permitted up to an amount not to exceed three (3) percent of the gross area of the Planned Unit Development or ten (10) acres, whichever is less. In addition, playgrounds, public and non-public parks, golf courses, country clubs, bicycle paths, racquet sports facilities, riding stables, marinas, clubhouses, and lodges may be permitted in a Planned Unit Development District. 7.01.03 STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS Standards and requirements for a Planned Unit Development shall be as follows: A. MINIMUM SIZE A Planned Unit Development shall be a minimum of five (5) contiguous acres of land under:: common ownership or control. B. DENSITY The maximum possible permitted density of a Planned Unit Development shall not exceed the density reflected in the Future Land Use Maps of the Comprehensive Plan. On North and South Hutchinson Island, the provisions of Section 3.01.03(AAX8) shall govern. C. AREA, YARD, AND HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS Area, yard, and height requirements shall be determined at the time of Preliminary and Final Development Plan approval, except that for any structure on North or South Hutchinson Island that has not been occupied, construded, or has not received a building permit, site plan or other County development approval as a permitted use prior to January 10, 1995 the requirements of Section 4.01.00, Hutchinson Island - Building Height Overlay Zone shall apply. D. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. The Planned Unit Development shall be designed and located so there will be no net public cost for the provision of water lines, sewage lines, storm and surface drainage systems, and other utility systems. 2. The minimum size of all water mains used, or intended for use, in fire protection activities i.!) six (6") inches. Actual water main requirements will be determined by the St. Lucie County- Ft. Pierce Fire Prevention Bureau. 3. The minimum size of all water mains used, or intended for use, in fire protection adivities, that are located on a dead-end water main is eight (8-) inches. Actual water main requirements will be determined by the St. Lucie County-Ft. Pierce Fire Prevention Bureau. Adopted August 1,1990 376 Revised Through 08101/00 '-' ....,¡ Section 7.01.00 Planned Unit Development The maximum number ot fire hydrants that may be located on any dead end water main is one (1). 4. Fire hydrants shall be provided at a minimum spacing ot one every six hundred (600) feet unless otherwise approved by the St. Lucie County-Ft. Pierce Fire Prevention Bureau, E. TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION 1. Every dwelling unit, or other use permitted in the Planned Unit Development shall have access to a public street either directly or through an approved private road, a pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use. 2. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to permit smooth traffic flow with controlled turning movement and minimum hazards to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. Minor streets within the Planned Unit Development shall not be connected to streets outside the development so as to encourage their use by through traffic. 3. The proposed Planned Unit Development shall be designed so that it will not create traffic congestion on the arterial and collector roads surrounding the project, or such surrounding collector or arterial roads shall be improved so that they will not be adversely affected. 4. All non-residential land uses within the Planned Unit Development shall have direct access to a collector or arterial street without creating traffic hazards or congestion on any street. 5. Streets in a Planned Unit Development may be dedicated to public use or retained under private ownership. Said streets and associated improvements shall comply with all pertinent County regulations and ordinances, however, variations to the standard minimum right-ot- way widths may be considered as part ot the Planned Unit Development it it is shown to the satisfaction ot the Board of County Commissioners, that the requested variation .is consistent with the intent of the County's roadway construction standards and necessary for the design of the Planned Unit Development. 6. All roads and streets shall intersect at an approximate ±5° angle of ninety degrees (900) unless circumstances acceptable to St. Lucie County indicate a need tor a lesser angle of intersection. 7. Street jogs or centerline offsets between any local street or road with another local street or road, shall be no less than one hundred fifty feet (150). 8. The intersection of any two local roads or streets with a Major Collector or Arterial Roadwåy shall be separated by a minimum distance of six hundred sixty feet (660), as measured from centerline to centerline. 9. Permanent dead-end streets shall not exceed one thousand feet (1000) in length. Cul-de-sacs shall be provided at the end ot all dead end roads or streets greater than five Adopted August 1,1990 377 Revised Through 08/01/00 '-' ....., Section 7,01.00 Planned Unit Development hundred and one (501) feet in length. The length of a dead-end street shall be measured along the centerline of the street from the its point of perpendicular intersection with the centerline of intersecting street to the end of the dead-end street or roadway. All cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum right-of-way diameter of one hundred (100) feet. If the dead end roadway is five hundred (500) feet or less in length. a "V" or"T" type of turn around may be approved. If a dead end street is temporary in nature then a temporary cul-de-sac shall be required until the roadway is connected to another street or road. In the center of the cul-de-sac an unpaved island, surrounded by a curb, improved with grass and landscaping that will not inteñere with sight distance, may be provided. Center islands shall have a diameter of not less than seventeen (11) feet, unless otherwise approved through the review of the Planned Unit Development. 10. All roadways, exclusive of interior parking and access aisles areas, regardless of ownership. shall be located a minimum of ten (10) feet from any exterior building wafls, except for security gate houses or similar security structures located in a private street or road right-of- way. 11. Any pedestrian circulation system and its related walkways shall be insulated from the vehicular street system. This shall include, when deemed to be necessary by the Board of County Commissioners, pedestrian underpasses or overpasses in the vicinity of playgrounds and other recreation areas, local shopping areas, and other neighborhood uses which generate a considerable amount of pedestrian traffic. 12. Access points on all collector or arterial streets serving a Planned Unit Development shall be located and spaced so that traffIC moving into and out of the arterial streets do not cause traffic congestion. F. PARKING AND LOADING 1. General Provisions a. The number, type, and location of parking spaces shall be determined at the time of final Planned Unit Development plan approval. The determination of the number of spaces required shall be based on Section 1.06.01 (F) of this Code. The number of parking spaces required by this section may be reduced based on substantial competent evidence that the reduced number of spaces is adequate for the proposed use or that parking may be shared by proximate uses that operate at different times or on different days. b. Reserved parking spaces may be provided, in lieu of paved spaces. subject to Section 1.06.02(C) of this Code. Adopted August 1, 1990 378 Revised Through 08101/00 '-' ..",J Section 7.01.00 Planned Unit Development 2. Off Street Parking and Loading Off-street parking and loading requirements are governed by Sections 7.06,02 and 7.06.03 of this Code, and the following standards: a. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be designed to provide travelways between adjacent uses while discouraging through traffic. b. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be screened from adjacent roads and pedestrian walkways with hedges, dense planting, or changes in grades or walls. 3. On Street Parking In Planned Unit Developments, on street parking may be used so long as the road on which the on-street parking is proposed lies entirely within the limits of the defined Planned Unit Development and such parking would not contravene any other provision of this CÒde or the S1. Lucie County Code of Ordinances. Where such on street parking and loading is used, it shall be consistent with the following design standards: a. The minimum size of a parking stall shall be as follows: parallel angled handicapped(parallel) handicapped(angled) 8 feet X 23 feet 10 feet X 18 feet 12 feet X 23 feet 12 feet X 18 feet b. Handicapped parking spaces shall be appropriately marked. c. Access for emergency fire vehicles shall be in accordance with NFPA standards. d. No more than fifteen (15) parking spaces shall be permitted in a continuous row without being interrupted by a minimum landscape area of 360 square feet. G. LIGHTING All lighting facilities shall be arranged in such a manner so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or properties. H. LANDSCAPING AND NATURAL FEATURES 1. Native trees and vegetation and other natural features shaU be preserved to the extent practicable. 2. All sensitive environmental vegetation, trees and areas shall be preserved to the extent practicable. Adopted August 1, 1990 379 Revised Through 08101/00 '-' ....,., Section 7.01.00 Planned Unit Development 3. Landscaping for off-street parking and loading areas shall meet the minimum requirements of Section 7.09.00. I. OPEN SPACE STANDARDS 1. A minimum of thirty-five (35) percent of the gross area of land to be committed to a Planned Unit Development must be for use as common open space, which may include, parks, recreation areas, bicycle and pedestrian paths and facilities, marinas, swimming beaches, common open space, common landscaping and planting areas, or other areas of public purposes or use other than street, road or drainage rights-of-way, above ground utilities, excluding stormwater treatment facilities, and parking areas. A minimum of 15 percent of any existing native upland habitat on the property, must be preserved in its natural condition as part of the required 35 pércent common open space, For each acre of preserved native habitat above the required minimum 15 per~nt that is preserved in its original state, credit shall be given at a rate of 150 percent per acre towards the remaining common open space requirement. All areas to be dedicated for common open space shall be identified as part of the Preliminary Development Plan for the Planned Unit Development. Areas that are floodways, lakes, wetlands, and stormwater retention areas may be applied to satisfy the total common open space requirement, subject to the requirement that 15% of any existing native habitat on the property must be included as part of the required 35% common open space. As part of the Final Planned Unit Development submission process, the developer or petitioner for the Planned Unit Development shall provide for one of the following: a. The advance dedication of all common open space toa public, or acceptable private, agency that will, upon acceptance, agree to maintain the common open space and any buildings, structures or improvements that have been placed on it. All such dedications or conveyances shall be completed prior to the issuance of any building permits, including land clearing, for any portion of the PI~nned Unit Development ;or, b. A phased conveyance of the land to a public or acceptable private agency that will, upon acceptance, agree to maintain the common open space and any buildings. structures or improvements that have been placed on it. The schedule for the phased conveyance of any such lands to be used for common open space shall be a specific condition of approval for the Planned Unit Development. 2. No parcel of lañd ideotified for use as a park or commQn open space shall be less than one (1) contiguous acre; and a!i such areas sh~1I be physically part of the Plånned Unit Devel- opment. 3. Areas provided or reserved to meet any other environmental preservation or protection requirement$ of this code or other lawful regulatory authority may be counted towards the overall common open space requirement, provided that the common open space meets the Adopted A~gust1. 1990 380 Revised Through 08101/00 \..- ....,,¡ Section 7.01.00 Planned Unit Development requirements of this Code. J. SETBACKS FROM AGRICUL rURAL LAND Planned Unit Developments adjacent to land used for agricultural purposes, or designated for agricultural use on the Future land Use Map of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, shall provide setbacks from the agricultural land sufficient to protect the function and operation of those uses from the encroachment of Urban activities or uses. K. PHASING 1. A Planned Unit Development may be developed in more than one stage or phase. 2. If a Final Development Site Plan approved by the Board of County Commissioners is to be developed in stages or phases. each successive phase shaH be constructed and çleveloped in a reasonably continuous fashion. No more than two (2) years shall elapse between the completion of any stage or phase, and the final stage or phase shall be completed within ten (10) years of the date of Final Development Site Plan approval. Extensions of the above requirements are subject to approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Unless otherwise amended by the Board of County Commissioners through the Final Development Site Plan review process, the following sequence of development must be adhered to: a. One or more major recreation facilities and other major amenities, planned to serve the entire development, shall be completed or adequate security posted prior to the issuance of building or mobile home permits of more than forty (40) percent. or other percentage as determined by the Board to be appropriate based on circumstances that include the size of the project and the proposed phasing schedule, of the total number of authorized dwelling units. Recreation facilities or. facilities and other amenities planned to serve one (1) phase of a multi-phased development shall be completed or appropriate security posted prior to issuance of building or mobile home pennits or the recording of any final plat within that phase. b. No commercial facility shall be permitted prior to the completion of at least forty (40) percent of the total number of authorized dwelling units; and, c. For Planned Unit Developments to be constructed in stages or phases, the net. density of an individual stage or phase may vary from the approved Final Site Plan sl!bject to the requirements in Section 11.02.05. Adopted August 1,1990 381 Revised Through 08101/00 ~, .....I AGENDA - PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION September 18, 2003 7:00 P.M. GLASSMAN PROPERTIES, LLC, has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural -1 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development- Johnston Lakes) Zoning District for the following described property: Location: Northwest corner of the intersection of Johnston Road and Indrio Road. Please note that all proceedings before the Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners September 8, 2003. Legal notice was published in The News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on September 8, 2003. File No. RZ-03-017 \...- ....,¡ September 8, 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that GlASSMAN PROPERTIES, LLC.., has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from the AG-l (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Johnston Lakes) Zoning District for the following described property: Location: Northwest corner of the intersection of Johnston Road and Indrio Road. THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AILABLE UPON REQUEST The fIrst public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on September 18, 2003, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Written comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission should be received by the County Planning Division at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing. County policy discourages communication with individual Planning and Zoning Commission and County Commission on any case outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or provide written comments for the record. The proceedings of the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross- examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462- 1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. Please call 772/462-1582 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number RZ-03-017. Sincerely, ~~:JYCI¡~~U~Y PL~i~G;~~¡ZONING COMMISSION ( / ?,' f Î '_I",/v ~,.. f +-:! i./ \, ':. o('t7'" ,. . ,.... l1 I" -.. , Ed Merritt, Chairman' ., JOHN D. ßRUHN. Disrricr No 1 . DOUG COWARD, Dlslricr No.2· PAULA A. LEWIS. Disrrlcr No. J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, DlsCllcr NO.4, CLIFF ßARNES, Disrricr NO.5 Counry Adminisrraror - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginio Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Administration: (772) 462-1590 · Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GISrrechnical Services: (772) 462-1553 Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 · Fax: (772) 462-1581 Tourist/Convenrion: (772) 462-1529 · Fax: (772) 462-2132 WWW.co.st-lucie.fl.us ~ ~ .¡: .. r'-I = .S ... tU E .. cSu .s..J .:! ..J 'å.i f:e 0IJ8.. ~£ ... = = tU ë i go,! 1i", t .. QcS .~~ =~ ëa EN e~ u .. 'ScS ... ... = .!!4 ~: ,,= eo .¡ 1;1.. ~ \.. ~~g~~~~~O\ ~-\Or--r--~~~~ ";1";19r--r--"';"";1~3";1 -"""" ""- OO~V) -00 ="0\""0\ -0\ ° Ñ~~~ ~~ gg .a ~¡i¡i¡i~~ã¡i¡i~ 8 ~ ~ 00 o § ~ ~ o ii:~ ~ t ~ - ,$' ~ U __ .... o -0 t ~ g ;gu ~-o I: ; CI} ~ ëi) ~r/);::; "C - r-- "C (" "" < ~ ~ \C ~ E tU Z It) ~ E ~ ...,. ~ E tU Z ~ ~ E ~ ("I ~ E tU Z .... ~ E. tU Z e- o u oj U I: ~~ o ~ I: I: "2 ,~ sa sa ~ 0-. en en 0 t ;: ;: > o 0 0 ~ ~:I::I:u .c u C< o 0 en ~ ~ 0 o I: U ii:~ð r~ 2 ~ -~,..:¡ ....,¡ r--o- oor--V) V) \00\ ""0"" I I ~ N"" OV) ""0\ ~"" ~ ~ ¡i¡i¡i .c U C< o ~ S 0 0 - ~ ~ ~ ,~,~ ...0-.0-. en t t ~ 0 0 ;>~~ ;>, ~ :I: r-- en 00 ° g¡> ~~:2 ð ð z ~~§ 00 O-.O-.N U I: - en o > eu -oo....¡ ~~....¡ oo~:: c.c. 6Þ~ §§§§§§§§§§§§§ ....-1....-4 1"""'4..................-.,...¡N....-4Lr)....-4N....... *§§§§§§§§§§§§§ .,...¡1"""'4....-4...-4..........-.t....-4..............~.............N Q-'<t~--N---~--N ...-~""~("~--NN~"""" 0\0\ 0\ 01r)1r) \0 \0 \0 \0\0\0\0 =000...........-4....-4...................-1............................ E-~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 00 o 0 ci5ci3 V) c.I'J ~ ~~O\~ gl:l:~1: \OOO_~ ~õõ ~~ o r/) r/) 0 r/) ~V)V)~- OÑÑO~ O-.O\O\O-.(" ;>, -0 ~ 0\ ~:I:\O ° Ë!V) 0- ~ ~ r/) ~ §~ 0-. E-< .c ] «I .~ ~ I: sa I: ~ ,..:¡ I: .c o ..... I: o C ~ ;>, o ::a ;: o ..... U U I: I: - - o 0 'C "C -0-0 .0 I: I: .0-- ~ ,5 ,5 U,..:¡...:! «I Z ..;.: I: ~o ;>,U .~ ~ ~& j en o U '€ :¡ g,en.... o f:! 0 d::3~ s:: I: ... C<~r/) ~ 0 ~ c.I'J .- .- ~ -6 5 O.9fi: ...., , ~ To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: []t] APPROVED C:=J OTHER - ..."J Agenda Request Item Number Date: 5E 05/04/04 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. ] [ ] [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ X ] Board of County Commissioners Growth Management Consider the request of Stephan Ross for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a 91,801 square foot household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse facility to be known as Cutting Edge Self-Storage in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard (entrance to The Grove residential community). Stephan Ross, submitted an application for major site plan and conditional use approval for a 91,801 square foot household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse facility on a 4.24-acre parcel. Household goods warehousing and storage mini- warehouse facilities are allowed as conditional uses in this zoning district subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners (File No: CU-03-018) N/A At the March 24, 2004, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Board of Adjustment granted a variance to allow the construction of buildings that would encroach a maximum of 13 feet into the front setback. The purpose of the variance was to allow the developer of the storage facility to donate 13 feet of the front of their property for the construction of a deceleration lane for The Grove residential community. At the March 25, 2004, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission reviewed the proposed conditional use permit and associated site plan and recommended approval, by a vote of 7 to 0 with two members (Mr. Trias and Mr. Grande) absent. At that hearing the applicant's representative, Richard Gallagher, proposed to move the buildings back another 10 feet to allow a setback of 22 feet from the ultimate right-of-way. Without the right-of-way dedication, the front setback is 35 feet. Staft recommends approval of the request for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a 91,801 square foot household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse facility to be known as Cutting Edge Self-Storage in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. Staft also recommends that the Board of County Commissioners determine whether the applicant should be required to redesign the project to address the concerns of the Environmental Resources Division (ERD) in regard to the preservation of a 50-inch DBH laurel Oak tree or if the project may be approved as submitted. D DENIED Approved 5-0 ---- ouglas M, Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: '1 " ~/ Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: " - ----- ~ ....,,¡. Commission Review: May 4, 2004 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Interim Growth Management Director DATE: April 28, 2004 SUBJECT: Application of Stephan Ross, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for household goods warehousing and storage .mini-warehouses in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. LOCATION: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway NO.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. ZONING DISTRICT: CG (Commercial, General) FUTURE LAND USE: COM (Commercial) PARCEL SIZE: 4.24 acres PROPOSED USE: Household goods warehousing and storage mini- warehouses SURROUNDING ZONING: CG (Commercial, General) to the north and south and across South U.S. Highway to the west. PUD (Planned Unit Development - The Grove) to the east. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing use surrounding the property is vacant to the north and south. ResidentiaJ is to the east. To the west across South U.S. Highway NO.1 the property is zoned CG. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is COM (Commercial) to the south and north. RU (Residential Urban) to the east. To the west, across South U.S. Highway No.1, the property has a COM (Commercial) designation. "-' -...I April 28, 2004 Page 2 Subject: Stephan Ross File No.: CU-03-008 FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #6 (350 East Midway Road), is located approximately 3 miles to the north/northeast. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject site will be serviced by an on-site well and septic system. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way width for South U.S. Highway No. 1 is 120 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None. The PD&E for this section of South U.S. Highway No.1 is currently being conducted. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity. ************************************************** This petition is for a combination of Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval. As such, it is required to satisfy both the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 and Section 11.02.09 of the County's Land Development Code. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed conditional use, the PJanning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed conditional use is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed conditional use is not in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 3.01.03(S)(7), CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District, allows household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse facilities as conditional uses \wt. "" April 28, 2004 Page 3 Subject: Stephan Ross File No.: CU-03-008 subject to Board of County Commission approval. The subject property is currently vacant. 2. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would have an adverse impact on nearby properties; The proposed conditional use is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. The subject property is currently vacant. The proposed site plan indicates landscaping along the eastern property line between the subject property and The Grove residential community. The required landscaping is to be enhanced with oak trees relocated from the interior of the property. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including roads, police protection, solid waste disposal, water, sewer, drainage structures, parks, and mass transit; This conditional use is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. The development will be provided with an on-site water and septic system. The existing transportation network is able to handle the proposed traffic impacts from the facility. 4. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would resuJt in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed conditional use is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The proposed mini-storage has a native vegetative area that will be preserved. ****************************************************** STANDARDS FOR DEVELOPMENT/SITE PLAN REVIEW In addition to the minimum standards of review and project development set out in Section 7.00.00, Section 11 .02.07, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code identifies the minimum Standards of Review for all proposed Site Plans. These standards must be met in order for any site plan approvals to be considered. Staff has reviewed the request for Major Site Plan approval, utilizing these requirements and notes the following: '-' ."" April 28, 2004 Page 4 Subject: Stephan Ross File No.: CU-03-008 A. CONSISTENCY WJTH LOCAL ORDINANCES AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed building and use is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County, and the proposed use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the particular provisions of this Code authorizing such use and any other requirement of the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. The proposed Cutting Edge self storage facility is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. These policies include, but are not limited to: Policy 1.1.1.1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes maximum lot coverage by buildings for the COM (Commercial) Future Land Use Category as 50 percent. The Cutting Edge project proposes a lot coverage by buildings of 50 percent. Policy 1.1.8.5 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan requires effective visual and light diffusion barriers between residential and non-residential uses. The Cutting Edge project provides screening between the subject property and adjacent parcels meeting the minimum standards of review. Several large size native trees on-site will be relocated from the interior of the project to the landscape buffers on the east and south. Policy 1.1.8.6 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan restricts commercial development to those traffic corridors where such development patterns now exist. The proposed Cutting Edge project is located on a parceJ of property zoned Commercial General, which allows for various commercial uses. Policy 1.1.9.10 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan requires that the developer of any site shall be responsible for the on-site management of runoff in a manner so that post-development runoff rates, volumes, and pollutant loads do not exceed pre-development conditions. The proposed Cutting Edge project has detention ponds that will be utilized to pre-treat any runoff prior to possible drainage off-site. B. EFFECT ON NEARBY PROPERTIES a. The proposed building or use will not have an undue adverse affect upon nearby property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, and other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. ~. .'wI April 28, 2004 Page 5 Subject: Stephan Ross File No.: CU-03-008 The proposed development is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. The proposed site is located within an area zoned for commercial general uses. The proposed self storage use is compatible with the general characteristics of the surrounding properties located to the north, west, and south. The property to the east is zoned for residential use and the storage facility will be properly screened. b. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed building or use on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. The developer has designed this project in a manner that will buffer the residential properties to the east. Several large trees from the interior of the site will be relocated to the eastern property line. c. The proposed building or use will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. The design of the proposed project has been determined not to interfere with the development or use of the neighboring properties. C. ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES The proposed building or use complies with the standards of Chapter V, Adequate Public Facilities. The subject property will receive water services through an on-site well and sewer services through an on-site septic system. D. ADEQUACY OF FIRE PROTECTION The applicant has obtained from the St. Lucie County Bureau of Fire Prevention written confirmation, or has otherwise demonstrated by substantial credible evidence, that water supply, evacuation facilities, and emergency access are satisfactory to provide adequate fire protection. The applicant has obtained from the St. Lucie County Bureau of Fire Prevention written confirmation that the proposed site plan conceptually meets the minimum access and water supply requirements for fire protection services at this facility. · ~ 'wi April 28, 2004 Page 6 Subject: Stephan Ross File No.: CU-03-008 E. ADEQUACY OF SCHOOL FACILITIES The proposed building or use will be serviced by adequate school facilities The applicant is proposing a use that will not impact school facilities. F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT For developments required to provide an environmental impact report under Section 11.02.09(A)(5), the proposed development will not contravene any applicable provision of the Sf. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, or of Chapter VIII, 'Natural Environment Analysis; of the St. Lucie County Barrier Island Study Analysis of Growth Management Policy Plan, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (August 1982). The proposed site plan has met the minimum mitigation requirements of the Land Development Code. There is, however, a substantially sized, healthy Laurel Oak (60 inches DBH - Diameter at Breast Height) on the property that the Environmental Resources Division (ERD) believes should be preserved. This tree is located in the southern side of the footprint of Building "C". ERD would like the applicant to redesign this building to preserve the tree in place. The applicant believes that the economic impact of redesigning the site to preserve the tree in place would make the project unfeasible. COMMENTS The applicant, Stephan Ross, has applied for the major site plan and conditional use permit approval in order to develop the subject property for a mini-storage facility. Household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouses are allowed as conditional uses in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. The proposed project consists of 91,801 square feet of space. A proposed office/copy center contains 3,000 square feet in two stories and the proposed mini-storage facility will contain 88,801 square feet in 5 buildings. On March 24, 2004, the St. Lucie County Board of Adjustment conducted a public hearing and approved the request of Mr. Ross for a Variance from the Provisions of Section 7.04.01 (A) of the Land Development Code to allow the proposed buildings to have a front setback of 12 feet versus the required 25-foot front setback. The purpose of the Variance was to allow the applicant to dedicate 13 feet from the front of the subject property to allow for the reconstruction of the deceleration lane into The Grove development. The current deceleration lane will be eliminated during the widening of South U.S. Highway NO.1. The site plan has met the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.02.09 of the Land Development Code at this time. Subsequent to the Board of Adjustment public hearing, Richard Gallagher, representing Mr. Ross, proposed ~ ~ April 28, 2004 Page 7 Subject: Stephan Ross File No.: CU-03-008 moving the building back an additional 10 feet, which would result in a front setback of 22 feet. The site plan has been modified by the applicant to indicate the dedication of the additional right-of-way, the location of the deceleration lane, and the proposed building setback of 22 feet. At the March 25, 2004, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 7 to 0 recommended approval for the requested conditional use permit in order to operate a household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse facility in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. Staff finds that the petition for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouses in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends approval of the requested conditional use permit. Staff finds that the proposed site plan has met the minimmun technical requirements of the Land Development Code. However, based upon the recommendation of the Environmental Resources Division (ERD) that the 60 inch DBH Laurel Oak be preserved in place by redesigning the project, staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners determine whether the applicant should be required to redesign the project to address the concerns of the ERD or if the project may be approved as submitted. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 04-085, which, if approved, would grant the requested conditional use permit. Please let me know if you have any questions. hf cc: Stephan Ross Richard Gallagher Allen Bottorff County Administrator County Attorney Planning Manager File ~. 'wi 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 RESOLUTION 04-085 FILE NO.: CU-03-o181MJSP-03-o18 A RESOLUTION GRANTING MAJOR SITE PLAN AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPROVAL TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF A HOUSEHOLD GOODS WAREHOUSING AND STORAGE MINI-WAREHOUSE FACILITY TO BE KNOWN AS CUTTING EDGE SELF-STORAGE IN THE CG (COMMERCIAL, GENERAL) ZONING DISTRICT FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1. Stephan Ross. presented a petition for a Conditional Use Permit to Permit to allow the operation of a 91,801 square foot household goods warehousing and storage mini- warehouse facility to be known as Cutting Edge Self-Storage in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District, depicted on the attached maps as Exhibit "A" and described in Part "B" below. 2. On March 25, 2004, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve a conditional use permit to Permit to allow the operation of a household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse facility in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for the property depicted on the attached Maps and described in Part B below. 3. On May 4, 2004, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 4. The proposed Conditional Use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 5. The proposed Conditional Use will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. File No.: CU-03-018/MJSP-03-018 May 4,2004 Resolution 04-085 Page 1 1 6. 2 3 4 7. 5 6 7 8 8. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 9. 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 10. 24 25 26 27 28 11. 29 30 31 32 12. 33 34 35 36 13. 37 38 39 40 14. 41 42 43 44 15. 45 46 "-' ...../ The proposed Conditional Use will be serviced by adequate public facilities and services. A Certificate of Capacity as required under Chapter V, St. Lucie Land Development Code, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Growth Management Director on May 4, 2004. Section 11.07.05(B) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that all applications for Conditional Use Permit approval include a full site plan if the proposed use or development activity meets the submission requirements of Section 11.02.02 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. SITE PLAN Stephen Ross, has applied for major site plan approval for the project to be known as Cutting Edge Self-Storage consisting of 91,801 square feet of space to include 88,801 square feet of storage space and a 3, 000 square foot office/copy center for 4.24 acres of property located at the southeast corner of the intersection of South Uf.S. Highway No. 1 and Sunshine Boulevard (Entrance to the Grove residential community) in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for the property described in Part B The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet minimum technical requirements of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and to be consistent with the future land use maps from the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services. File No.: CU-03-0 1 8/MJSP-03-0 18 May 4, 2004 Resolution 04-085 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 '-' " 16. The applicant has applied for and received a revised certificate of capacity, a copy of which is attached to this order as Exhibit A, as required under Chapter V, St. Lucie County Land Development Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A. Pursuant to Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a Conditional Use Permit for Stephan Ross to allow the operation of a 91,801 square foot household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse facility, to be known as Cutting Edge Self-Storage in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District Permit is hereby granted for the property described as follows: THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF LOT 259, 'WHITE CITY" PLAT, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 23, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAINT LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS THE EAST 30 FEET DEDICATED FOR CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR NORTH SAINT LUCIE RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (N.S.L.R.W.M.D.); LESS THE WEST 78 FEET DEDICATED RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR STATE ROAD 5. SAID LANDS SITUATE, LYING AND BEING IN SAINT LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 4.245 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. (Tax ID#: 3403-502-0344-000/0) (Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard (entrance to The Grove residential development» SITE PLAN B. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the site plan for the project known as Cutting Edge Self-Storage, is hereby approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Thomas Lucido & Associates, Inc., Inc. dated April 5, 2004, and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director on April 6, 2004, for the property described as follows: THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF LOT 259, 'WHITE CITY" PLAT, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 1, PAGE 23, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAINT LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS THE EAST 30 FEET DEDICATED FOR CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR NORTH SAINT LUCIE RIVER WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT (N.S.L.R.W.M.D.); File No.: CU-03-018/MJSP-03-018 May 4,2004 Resolution 04-085 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 C. 12 13 14 15 16 17 D. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 E. 26 27 28 29 30 31 F. 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 \w '" LESS THE WEST 78 FEET DEDICATED RIGHT·OF·WAY FOR STATE ROAD 5. SAID LANDS SITUATE, LYING AND BEING IN SAINT LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. CONTAINING 4.245 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. (Tax ID#: 3403-502-0344-000/0) (Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard (entrance to The Grove residential development» The approvals and authorizations granted by this Resolution for the purpose of obtaining building permits on this property, shall expire on May 4,2005, unless building permits have been issued or an extension in accordance with Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code has been granted. The Major Site Plan/Conditional Use Permit approval granted under this Resolution is ,cailY conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Stephan Ross, including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary permits and authorizations from the appropriate Local, State, and Federal regulatory authorities prior to the issuance of any local building permits or authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part B. The Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, shall remain valid for the period of Conditional Use approval. Should the Conditional Use approval granted by this resolution expire or an extension be sought pursuant to Section 11.07 .05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. The St. Lucie County Growth Management Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis xxx Vice-Chairman John D. Bruhn xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx Commissioner Doug Coward xxx File No.: CU-03-018/MJSP-03-018 May 4,2004 Resolution 04-085 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 '-" .....¡ Commissioner Cliff Barnes xxx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 4th Day of May 2004. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney hf H:\ W ORD\Petitions\BCC\Finished .03\AirportStorage. CU\AirportStorageR ES.doc File No.: CU-03-018/MJSP-03-018 May 4, 2004 Resolution 04-085 Page 5 '-' 'wi 1 2 3 4 Exhibit A 5 6 7 Maps 8 9 · General Location Map · Area Subject to the Conditional Use Permit Approval · Certificate of Capacity 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 File No.: CU-03-018/MJSP-03-018 May 4, 2004 Resolution 04-085 Page 6 .... z II C/) r{ C/) CX) '1 I I 0 .,.- a: 0 I 10~' t .. . CV) , c 0 ~ I CO ..c \'I .~ ~ I I 0.. :J Q) 0 '\{ , -+-1 \ C ~ (j) , ~ "'.. 1IiïiIWO; .t e . C " .. +->0 I 0'- \\ .Q2. 1\1-.. · ... 11; I 0 0 ~ '" GII ... " ~ 0 " ... ca: ç .'1 CL --.J .. z -r ::J _ ..-- '-.~ 0 ç ü z -- ::J 0 .:, -- --,- Ü a: UJ I - ~ ..... > ! ä: I ... .. . __ 'II" Z : ... ¡::: :'I .. I :'I a: I _ 1IO,'Wn « ca: -- ~ Z ca: « Õ .z-) ......., ~ .NV ! ... ... ... I ... ... tPI!' ... ca: ca: ~f>'I ., S S[ 1 S lot 1 S 9[ 1 \ .. AlNn08 3380H833>10 - ~ ~ A Petition of Stephan Ross for a Conditional Use Permit to allow household goods warehousIng and storage mini-warehouses in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. I I II I L-..- I I fA ~1ñO :::LI-L- III ,--- I I I :æS8 -=-- ~- -- -- f-c- L-..- :æ87 ~---- ---- ~~ JJ 1'"l IJ ,-T- (ì Conal ~ JJ [~I J l--' .l_~~iJ r-1 'l r LJI ~ ~---;J ~-~ I L I ~---.I~l :æsoG 1 ~ ~--l -.I ~ jll...J I rl --.J ~ ~ ~lll ~ ~-11 - 0 z Õ c: 0 U >. 0 ~ .c: 01 I V> ::J 0 Q) 0 0 ~ a:: , Ü ....J V> ~ Z "0 C 0 x Q) « :æ88 0 c: 0 c: 0 CD 7/ Map prepared March 5, 2004 t CU 03-018 ~ This pattern indicates subject parcel 5è.Á~ ~-7' GIS .~_,,,_..=. ThiI m.p hM ~ comphd for gennlp¡.mlng rd ~ ~ rn¡. N 'M1ÌIII .wry lIIIort '* ~ 1l'\IIOI 10 pnMde ~ rTIOIt~ n acanIII ~ poyiòIe,MII noIinIended for~. .legIIIybindrQ doc:u"I'In '--' '" Zoning Stephan Ross o z JJ lJ Conol C\J I (f) a: 21~ f--' I ~lll~ '''-lJI ~_I ~I ~ IIL...J -.J >. o ~ .c. CI Ï (/) A. Ae'L ;:) o o a::: -I (/) Z Ii 218 211 o c o c o CD 217 --- ---- CU 03-018 ~ This pattern indicates subject parcel 5è ~uø6 ~4" GIS ~"'_~. Map prepared March 5, 2004 'ThII1Np '* ~ compIId largennl~ a"ICI .......,. ~ ortJ· N WI"iII every "crt'" œ., ,..... 10 PRMdt IN rIW:JII o.mnIlnd ICCInIe inlorrndon pouibII, It it noIlnIended lor.... .. . ~ ~ docu'nert '--' '-' Land Use Stephan Ross Conol r-+ l.-i J l r-T- (ì ~ RU 21~ J ["'/ J J .l_~ ~ -;¡ ç-. ~ ?'r 1'-: ~ ---1 L -.I I rl I~ ? 11 I ~ }-~ ~-11- -. r-llL r LJ I .J ~-¡l ~ j Il....l -II OM RM o Z '1/ >- a ~ .s::: 0\ I RU (/) A Ao'L :;) ISJ 218 C 211 a ISJ c a c a CD 21'1 --- ---- Map prepared March 5. 2004 t CU 03-018 W; This pattern indicates subject parcel 9:- ~uØe &,~ GIS .o_.~,:>__~ Thill map ~ been 00I'JIØiIed lor gennt p.m¡ng ."g I8fIrInce p.wpoeeI cny. N 'Mill eYe!')' .rforI_ been mIde 10 ~ !he mOIl ~ Met .xuu l~poeeibIe.llilnotirleendtdloruee..~bindrlgdoc:unlrt '" ""'" Stephan Ross ....,. .: ~' '.~.~ ',:~~ '\~:.* !- ~,...',.-:',~. ....... ~ ...;, -'.' ..... . CU 03-018 ~ This pattern indicates subject parcel Sè~~~~", GIS .=..,,'_~. Map prepared March 5. 2004 TNsm.phubNn~Ia~~~NII8rence~aYt'. N 'MIiIe...,.,., IIftorthu t..n rNCM 10 ~.. mœlcurentlnd W'.OJrIIIe InkJrTrW:Ion posable, It II nDllrIIIrIc*I tar ~ . . IIIO-"Y binding doaII'In. o. ~ \..t .~ Stephan Ross ----------- I I I I I I : 4.22 I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I )J lJ r-- l-iJ l ,-¡-- (i ~ Conol -- --------------- - ¡--. r-l/l r LJ/ ~ ~_/ ~l ~ II l...J -II 4.94 214 í_~ o z 4.92 >- o ~ ,£; 0'1 :f VI ::::) 2.65 0.46 0.92 2.23 ~------------- --------------- - 21. /I 211 o c: o c: o LD --- --- 217 71 CU 03-018 -------·500' boundary ~ This pattern indicates subject parcel 5è" "Luviç ~~ GIS ~,,"~-::.'d~ t Map prepared March 5. 2004 Thle n'IIP has bMn IXnIpI/rId lOr generII p.nnng and r....... p..)OMI 0tt1 N 'MöI fMJIIy eIftvt _ t.n IMde 10 provide the molt CUIWIt Md eoa.me lnIornwICn pouIbIe, 1111 nat InIInded lor UN _ . Iegdy ÞnInj dDrUnn C"" " ( ( ( t, (, S. ~ ~ Section 3,01,03 Zoning District Use Regulations CG COMMERCIAl. GENERAL 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for a wide variety of commercial uses intended to serve a population over a large market area, which do not impose undesirable noise. vibration, odor, dust, or offensive effects on the surrounding area, together with such other uses as may be necessary to and compatible with general commercial surroundings, The number in "()" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02{B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses e. f. g. h. i. j. k. I. m. n. o. p. q. r. s. t. u. v. w. x. y. z. aa. bb. cc, dd. " ee. ff. 9g· Adopted August 1. 1990 a. b. c. d. AdjustmenVcollection & credit reporting services (732) Advertising (731) Amphitheaters (999) Amusements & recreation services - except stadiums, arenas, race tracks, amusement parks and bingo parlors (79) Apparel & accessory stores (56) Automobile dealers (55) Automotive rental, repairs & servo (except body repairs) (751.753.754) Beauty and barber services (723/724) Building materials, hardware and garden supply (52) Cleaning services 7349) Commercial printing (999) Communications - except towers (48) Computer programming, data processing & other computer servo (737) Contract construction servo (office & interior storage only) (15116/17) Cultural activities and nature exhibitions (999) Duplicating, mailing, commercial art/photo. & stenog. servo (733) Eating places (581) Educational services - except public schools (82) Engineering, accounting, research, management & related services (87) Equipment rental and leasing services (735) Executive, legislative, and judicial functions (91/92/93/94/95/96/97) Farm labor and management services (076) Financial, insurance, and real estate (60161162/63164165167) FOOd stores (54) Funeral and crematory services (726) Gasoline service stations (5541) General merchandise stores (53) Health services (80) Home furniture and furnishings (57) landscape & horticultural services (078) laundry, cleaning and garment services (721) Membership organizations - except for religious organizations as provided in Section 8.02.01 (H) of this code (86) Miscellaneous retail (see SIC Code Major Group 59): (1) Drug stores (591) 118 Revised Through 08l01!i10 jj. kk. II. mm. nn. 00. pp. qq. rr. ss. tt. uu. w, ww. xx. \.,t " Section 3.01,03 Zoning District Use Regulations (' ( hh, (2) Used merchandise stores (593) (3) Sporting goods (5941) (4) Book & station ary (5942/5943) (5) Jewelry (5944) (6) Hobby, toy and games (5945) (7) Camera & photographic supplies (5946) (8) Gifts, novelty and souvenir (5947) (9) Luggage & leather goods (5948) (10) Fabric and mill products (5949) (11) Catalog, 'mail order and direct selling (5961/5963) (12) Liquified petroleum gas (propane) (5984) (13) Florists (5992) ( 14 ) Tobacco (5993) (15) News dealers/newsstands (5994) (16) Optical goods (5995) (17) Misc. retail (See SIC Code for specific uses) (5999) Miscellaneous personal services (see SIC Code Major Group 72): (1) Tax return services (7291) (2) Misc. retail (See SIC Code for specific uses) (7299) Miscellaneous business services (see SIC Code Major Group 73): (1) Detective, guard and armored car services (7381) (2) Security system services (7382) (3) News syndicate (7383) (4) Photofinishing laboratories (7384) (5) Business services - misc. (7389) Mobile home dealers (527) Mobile food vendors (eating places, fruits & vegetables-retail) (999) Motion pictures (78) Motor vehicle parking - commercial parking & vehicle storage. (752) Museums, galleries and gardens (84) Personnel supply services (736) Photo finishing services (7384) Photographic services (722) Postal services (43) Recreation facilities (999) Repair services (76) Retail trade-indoor display and sales only, except as provided in Section 7,00.00. (999) Social services: (1) Individual & family social services (8321839) (2) Child care services (835) (3) Job training and vocational rehabilitation services (833) Travel agencies (4724) Veterinary services (074) ( ( ii. 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. Adopted August 1. 1990 ( (( 119 Revised Through 08101/00 ("" J ~ \. 4. "" '" ~'·;cti"'n '301,03 Zoning District Use Høgulations Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04,00, 5. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. 6, Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00. 7. Conditional Uses ( ( a, b. c. d. e. f. g. h. i. j. k, Adult establishments subject to requirements of Sec. 7.10.10. (999) Drinking places (alcoholic beverages) - free-standing. (5813) Disinfecting & pest control services. (7342 Amusement parks. (7996) Go-cart tracks. (7999) Hotels & motels. (701) Household goods warehousing and storage-mini-warehouses (999) Marina - recreational boats only. (4493) Motor vehicle repair services - body repair. (753) Sporting and recreational camps. (7032) Retail trade: (1) Liquor stores. (592) Stadiums, arenas, and race tracks, (794) Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7,10,:',; (H!r.) k. I. 8. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and inc!uck [il'. 'u' a. Drinking places (alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and/or dvic, social, and fraternal organizations). b. One single-family dwelling unit contained within the commercial bl ,¡Irl;nl], or a det~ched single-family dwelling or mobile home, (for on-site security pUrpOS(5). c. Retail trade: (1) Undistilled alcoholic beverages (accessory to retail sale of food). Adopted August 1. 1990 120 Revised Through 08101100 '" "WI _ - ~--.-:.''''':'''':l :>'.1 \ I AGENDA ITEM 3 Cuttin2 Ed2e Self-Stora2e of Ft. Pierce. LLC. (Stephan Ross. A2ent) - File No. CU-03-018: Mr. Hank Flores, presenting Staff comments, stated that Agenda Item # 3 was the application of Stephan Ross, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouses in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for 424 acres of property located at the Southeast comer of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. Household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouses are allowed as conditional uses in the CG Zoning District subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. The proposed project consists of 90,607 square feet of space. A proposed office/copy center contains 3,000 square feet and the proposed mini-storage facility will contain 87,706 square feet in 5 buildings. On March 24, 2004, the Board of Adjustment approved the request of Mr. Ross for a variance from the Provisions of Section 7.04.01(A) of the Land Development Code to allow for the proposed buildings to have a front setback of 12 feet versus the required 25 foot front setback. The purpose of the variance was to allow the applicant to dedicate 13 feet from the front of the subject property to allow for the reconstruction of the deceleration lane into The Grove development. The current deceleration lane will be eliminated during the widening of South U.S. 1. Subsequent to the Board of Adjustment action, Richard Gallagher, representing Mr. Ross, proposed a redesign of the project which would allow for an additional 10 feet of front setback for a total front setback of 22 feet. Staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in the Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Chainnan McCurdy questioned if the applicant was present. Mr. Al Brodeur, Thomas Lucido and Associates, stated that he was representing the petitioner and was available to answer any questions. Mr. Lounds asked that Mr. Brodeur address the deceleration lane problem for Palm Grove. Mr. Brodeur stated that the Florida Department of Transporation (FDOT) was not planning on having the deceleration lane there once the road is widened. He continued that the applicant has agreed to deed over his property to FDOT so that there would be enough space for them to have the deceleration lane. Chairman McCurdy opened the public hearing. Mr. Walter Elis stated that he was Vice President of the Grove Community and that the Board of Adjustment granted a variance. He continued that the applicant showed a plan P&Z / LPA Special Meeting March 25, 2004 Page 9 of 16 '-' ..J .,- ,-,- '-'·1 .: s=:J for the facility that looks nice and that they are all in favor of this request. Mr. Lounds questioned if they were upset at all with this request. Mr. Elis stated that they are not against it at all and asked that it be approved. J 1 ~t Mr. Richard Gallagher stated part of the project would allow a twenty-two foot setback for FDOT to have the deceleration lane. He also stated that this is a nice project. Ms. Hammer thanked the applicant for working with the residents in advance to coming to this public hearing. Mr. Jonathan Ferguson from Ruden McClosky stated that he was there representing a property owner at the entrance to the Grove. He stated that they have two issues with the project. He continued that the Board of Adjustment did not need to issue a variance when the applicant agreed to the deceleration lane because requesting a conditional use permit could have done that. He also stated there should be a condition added to this request to ensure that the area is dedicated. He advised that the applicant should also be required to provide a new plan that meets the requirements of the Architectural Standards Ordinance and shows the elevations for all four sides of the buildings prior to the Board of County Commissioners meeting. He stated that since this property is undeveloped they didn't think there should be a problem with maintaining the required 25-foot setback, especially since it is only an additional 3 feet. He stated that they are not totally opposed to the project but are concerned about these issues. Ms. Hammer questioned if the applicant would be willing to move the project back an additional three feet to maintain the required 25-foot setback. Mr. Al Brodeur stated that they received approval for the reduced setback requirement at the Board of Adjustment the day before. He continued that the reductions they have already made lost them 1150 square feet of space and that three more feet would cost them even more money. Mr. Lou Juliano stated that the applicant has been working with the homeowners in the Grove and doesn't understand why this one particular owner needs to keep opposing this. Ms. Kit Lindberger stated that they would not have their deceleration lane if it wasn't for this applicant and doesn't understand what the problem the other one resident is having. Mr. Ralph pazzaro stated that he didn't understand what that one resident's problem was but felt it might be that they want to build a strip mall even though strip malls are not flourishing in the area. Ms. Francis Felicia stated that this applicant has worked with them, shown them drawings, and been asking their input since the beginning. She continued that the one opposing resident is supposedly planning some sort of strip mall, but they wouldn't know since he has never contacted them and is keeping his plans a secret. Chairman McCurdy closed the public hearing. P&Z I LPA Special Meeting March 25, 2004 Page 10 of 16 '-' -...I Mr. Hearn stated that after considering the testimony presented during the public hearing, including Staff comments, and the Standards of Review as set forth in Section 11.07.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, I hereby move that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to the application of Stephan Ross, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the operation of a household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse facility in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District including the variance that was granted to the applicant at yesterday's Board of Adjustment meeting because it apparently is exactly what the community surrounding it wants and it's appropriate for that area. Motion seconded by Mr. Merritt. Chairman McCurdy stated that there was some discussion about the Architectural Standards and questioned if those standards would be reviewed prior to approval. Mr. Kelly confirmed that Staff would usually be sure they are met prior to permitting being allowed. He also stated that they could take a look at them prior to the Board of County Commissioners meeting. Mr. Al Brodeur stated that they did not have a problem with providing the elevations and having the standards reviewed prior to the Board meeting. Upon a roll call vote the motion was unanimously approved (with a vote of 7-0) and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. ;~~ P&Z I LPA Special Meeting March 25, 2004 Page 11 of 16 \..f "" Planning and Zoning Commission Review: 03/25/04 File Number RZ-03-018 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Planning Manager \flY- DATE: March 18,2004 SUBJECT: Application of Stephan Ross, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouses in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. LOCATION: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway no. 1 and Sunshine Boulevard. ZONING DISTRICT: CG (Commercial, General) FUTURE LAND USE: COM (Commercial) PARCEL SIZE: 4.24 acres PROPOSED USE: Household goods warehousing and storage mini- warehouses SURROUNDING ZONING: CG (Commercial, General) to the north and south and across South U.S. Highway to the west. PUD (Planned Unit Development - The Grove) to the east. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing use surrounding the property is vacant to the north and south. Residential is to the east. To the west across South U.S. Highway NO.1 the property is zoned CG. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is COM (Commercial) to the south and north. RU (Residential Urban) to the east. To the west across South U.S. Highway NO.1 the property has a COM (Commercial) designation. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #6 (350 East Midway Road), is located approximately 3 miles to the north/northeast. '-' -.J March 18, 2004 Page 2 Subject: Stephan Ross File No.: CU-03-018 UTILITY SERVICE: The subject site will be serviced by an on-site well and septic system. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-Of-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way width for South U.S. Highway No. 1 is 120 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None. TYPE Of CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity. ************************************************************* STANDARDS Of REVIEW AS SET fORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for the proposed conditional use, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed conditional use is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed conditional use is not in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 3.01.03(5)(7), CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District, allows household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse facilities as conditional uses subject to Board of County Commission approval. The subject property is currently vacant. 2. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would have an adverse impact on nearby properties; The proposed conditional use is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. The subject property is currently vacant. The proposed site plan indicates landscaping along the eastern property line between the subject property and The Grove residential community. The required landscaping is to be enhanced with oak trees relocated from the interior of the property. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including roads, police ~ '..J March 18, 2004 Page 3 Subject: Stephan Ross File No.: CU-03-018 protection, solid waste disposal, water, sewer, drainage structures, parks, and mass transit; This conditional use is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. The development will be provided with an on-site water and septic system. The existing transportation network is able to handle the proposed traffic impacts from the facility. 4. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed conditional use is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The proposed mini-storage has a native vegetative area that will be preserved. COMMENTS The applicant, Stephan Ross, has applied for the requested conditional use in order to develop the subject property for a mini-storage facility. Household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouses are allowed as conditional uses in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. The proposed project consists of 90,607 square feet of space. An existing office/copy center contains 3,000 square feet and the proposed mini-storage facility will contain 87,706 square feet in 5 buildings. On March 24, 2004, the St. Lucie County Board of Adjustment is scheduled to hear the public hearing on the request of Stephan Ross for a variance from the Provisions of Section 7.04.01 (A) of the Land Development Code to allow the proposed buildings to have a front setback of 12 feet versus the required 25-foot front setback. The hearing was continued from the Board of Adjustment meeting of February 25, 2004. If the variance is granted, the applicant will be able to dedicate 13 feet from the front of the subject property to allow for the reconstruction of the deceleration lane into The Grove development. The deceleration lane would be eliminated during the widening of South U.S. Highway NO.1 if Mr. Ross is unable to dedicate the property. The site plan (copy attached) does not indicate the location of the proposed deceleration lane. The site plan (copy attached) has met the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.02.09 of the Land Development Code at this time. The site plan will be modified if the variance is granted by the Board of Adjustment to reflect the location of the deceleration lane. Staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment hf cc: County Administrator \..r '...J March 18, 2004 Page 4 Subject: Stephan Ross File No.: CU-03-018 County Attorney Stephan Ross Richard Gallagher File '-" 'wi Suggested motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested conditional use. MOTION TO APPROVE: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT APPROVAL TO THE APPLICATION OF STEPHAN ROSS, FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE OPERATION OF A HOUSEHOLD GOODS WAREHOUSING AND STORAGE MINI- WAREHOUSE FACILITY IN THE CG (COMMERCIAL, GENERAL) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE... [LIST CONDITION(S)] MOTION TO DENY: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, AND THE STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION RECOMMEND THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE APPLICATION OF STEPHAN ROSS, FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW FOR THE OPERATION OF A HOUSEHOLD GOODS WAREHOUSING AND STORAGE MINI-WAREHOUSE FACILITY IN THE CG (COMMERCIAL, GENERAL) ZONING DISTRICT, BECAUSE... [CITE REASON(S) WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC] let VANCED LI:An....._, 69 'TER MANAGEM~"'T o IOIICE OF -- 0120 I011Cf OF .... --.;J ST. LUCIE CDUNTY,q PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA March 25, 2004 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Sec- tion 11.00,03 of the St. Lucie County land Devel opment Code and in accordance with the provi- sions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission consider tha fOllowing requests: be STEPHAN ROSS, for a Conditional Use Permit to let allow household goods warehousing Ind storage ,. s mini-warlhouses (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pilrce) in thl CG (Commercial, General) Zoning If District for the following described property: let lin 111- In· or he at II, ia, WHITE CITY SID 10 36 40 N 1/2 OF LOT 259 . LESS CANAL RIW (4,24 AC.) Location:Southeast corner of the intersection of South U,S. Highway No. 1 and Sunshinl Boull- <0' vard. (Entrance to The GrOVI residential commu. nity) NORTHWOOD 1.1.C, (DICKERSON-FLORIDA, INC" AGENT) for a Conditional Use Permit to alia ,Ii': mining and qu.rrying of non-m.tallic minerals, except fuels (limerock) in the AG-5 (Agricultural . .... 1 dul 5 acres) Zoning District for the following de. . ~ scribed property: I !ä TRACT I 'j LE ALL OF THE EAST HALF (E 112) OF SECTION 9 ., TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, EX. ,,' CEPTING THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DE SCRIBED PARCEL, TO-WIT: 1M! BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF I :>N THE EAST HALF (E 112) OF SAID SECTION 9, RUN ":~ CA EAST 52 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY IN A, STRAIGHT LINE 5339.35 FEET, MORE OR LESS;l TO A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF THE EAS"'4 HALF (E 112) OF SAID SECTION 9, WHICH POIN I IS 13 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER )r- OF THE EAST HALF (E 1/2) OF SAID SECTION 9; ! I E THENCE RUN WEST 13 FEET TO THE SOUTH- . S, WEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF (E 1/2) OF- 'a- SAID SECTION 9; THENCE RUN NORTH ALONG . L· THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF IE 1/2) 0 ..", -IE SAID SECTION 9 TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. . IY da TRACT II ,n, ALL OF THE EAST HALF (E 1/2) OF SECTION 4, A, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, EX- ~E CEPTlNG THEREFROM THE FOLLOWING DE. IS SCRIBED PARCEL, TO WIT: in BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF (E 112) OF SAID SECTION 4, RUN EAST 101.0 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTHERLY IN " A STRAIGHT LINE 5565.25 FEET, MORE OR LESS . TO A POINT IN THE SOUTH LINE OF THE EAST Jr- HALF (E 112) OF SAID SECTION 4, WHICH POIN la· IS 52 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTHWEST CORNER 10' OF THE EAST HALF IE 112) OF SAID SECTION 4; 31- THENCE RUN WEST 52 FEET TO THE SOUTH--': In- WEST CORNER OF THE EAST HALF IE 1/2) OF ,t '3- SAID SECTION 4; THENCE RUN NORTH ALONG lit THE WEST LINE OF THE EAST HALF (E 1/2) OF ~ ,th SAID SECTION 4, TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. nd ri- TRACT III JF THAT PART OF THE EAST 1/2 OF SECTION 33,:: 1e TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, ST. LU- ., CIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING EAST OF THE n, CENTER LINE OF AN EXISTING ROAD RUNNING :1- ALONG OR NEAR THE WEST SIDE OF SAID EAST 1a 1/2 AND ALSO LYING SOUTH OF THE CENTER B. LINE OF AN EXISTING CANAL RUNNING ALONG" u- OR NEAR THE NORTH SIDE OF SAID EAST 1/2; & SAID PROPERTY BEING MORE PARTICULARLY a DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: Ir· T I ."" w IF BEGIN IN THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION Id AT A POINT 49 FEET EAST OF THE SOUTH_~ Ii· QUARTER CORNER OF SAID, SECTION 33 (SAI It- POINT BEING IN THE CENTER LINE OF AN EXIST s· ING GRADED DIRT ROAD), RUN THENCE N 01 roo' WEST ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAI ,:í ROAD 5218 FEET TO A POINT 75 FEET EAST AN A sh 100.5 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTH aUARTE 1e CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33, THENCE TUR ·t· AND RUN EASTERLY 52 FEET TO A POINT 127 In FEET EAST AND 100.5 FEET SOUTH OF TH ~~ ri- NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION " " (SAID POINT BEING IN THE CENTER UNE OF ~e EXISTING CANAL, WHERE SAID CANAL CENTER d LINE TURNS TO THE EASTERL YI, RUN THENCE _ 1d ALONG THE CENTER LINE OF SAID CANAl, N . 88 . OS' E 681.4 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 82" 11' YEAST 147.6 FEET, STILL ALONG SAID CANAL _ u- CENTER LINE, THENCE NORTH 77 ·11' EAS .;':' ,f 381.4 FEET, STILL ALONG SAID CANAL CENTER iT ~'~h ~E~~~ ~~~ cø:~Æt' CWiE~3~~E~ IF THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 33 AT A.. t POINT 23,3 FEET SOUTH OF THE NORTHEM Ie CORNER THEREOF, THENCE TURN AND lE , ,f SAID CANAL CENTER LINE AND RUN SOUl ALONG THE EAST UNE OF SAID SECTION 33' THE SOtlTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 33 THENCE WEST 2568 FEET TO THE POINT OF 8E~ ~: GINNING. :i SAID TRACTS CONTAINING IN AGGREGAT .¡ j 964.31 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. locltion:West side of Carlton Ro.d, Ipproxl mately 4,500 feet north of intersection of Gla Cut·Off Road and Carlton Ro.d. J aD PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the CommlA,lo . Chambers, Roger Poitras Annex, 3rd Roor, St., Lu cle County Administretion Building, 2300 VirgrnN Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on March 25, 21 beginning at 7:00 P.M, or as soon thereafter .a possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286,0105, Florid. StAltutee if a person decides to appeel any deci.ion made by a board, agency, or commission with reapect to any matter consIdered at . meeting or he.ring; he will nlld a record of the proceedings, In that, for such purposes, he m.y need to, ensure, that a verbatim rlcord of the proceedings i m.de which record includes the tlltimony In Ivide~ce upon which the appeal is to be basad. LOCAL PLANNING AGENCYI PLANNING . r\ AND ZONING COMMISSION ...-c\ \ ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Y ISI Carson McCurdy, Chairm.n PUBLISH DATE: Mlrch 15,2004 537838 - ~,~ '-" "'" - ~:~---~ -~I> BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ~=r··.~·eJ·e· "..E: .. '. .__...."..~.~....... ............. COUNTY \ ~ F LOR I D A --,-,' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR March 15,2004 In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that STEPHAN ROSS has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Conditional Use Permit to allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for the following described property: Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AILABLE UPON REQUEST The fIrst public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on March 25, 2004, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Planning and Zoning Commission at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing. County policy discourages communication with individual Planning and Zoning Commission and County Commission on any case outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or provide written comments for the record. . The proceedings of the Planning and Zoning Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Planning and Zoning Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross- examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462- 1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. Please call (772) 462-1582 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number: CU-03-018. Sincerely, S~., LUCIE S~~N!Y PL.ANNI~Ç ~~ ZONING COMMISSION ( CLAð1"n )¡ n {. {i{<Ir/ / PS/A- ~ Carson McCurdy, Chairman JOHN D. ßRUHN, Disrrict No.1· DOUG COWARD, District No.2· PAULA A. LEWIS, District No. J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No.4. CLIFF ßARNES, District No.5 County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Administration: (772) 462-1590 · Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GISlTechnical SeNices: (772) 462-1553 Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 . Fax: (772) 462-1581 Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 · Fax: (772) 462-2132 www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us III CI "0 W c: CI .2 c: .~ ~ ëu ~~ ...", c: '" ~~ o.c: oS! II 1II,c > Q. .!ß! ~cô c:.. ~9 EM EO sa - ... o 0 -- c:Ui III ._ E- t:g' II .- 0.= .!~ ~ ....; ~ ~~~~ 0 ~ ~ ææææM MMg ~~~ ~8~ ~~~~ ~ g ~ ~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~ ~8~ VN~~NN~NNNNNNNNNNMNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN ~~N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~O~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Q.~m~~~~~mm~~m~mmmm~~mmmmmmmm~m~mmmmmmmmmmmm~m _M~"~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ MMOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMOMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Z~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ III III ~ ø ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~ e ~ e e ø ~ ~ e e e e e e e e e e e e ø e e e e e e ~ e e e m ~ D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ III ~ ~ III ~ III ~.- 0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ III 0 III ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~Œ~~~~~r~~W~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~c~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ u~~ð~~~Œ~~~~æ~~~~~~~~æ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I~ S: ~~ ~ ~~~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~ ~~.~.~.~ 2> ~~s:>s:UüüUüüü üUüüüccccccccccccccc ~ ffi - - ~ 0 ffi 0'~'~'~'~'~ ,~.~ ~.~,~,~,~.~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C C C C C C ~~ I~I~~O"'~"'''O~''O~~~~~~''O~''O~CCCCCCCCCCCCCCC~~~~~~ Ie C -1e:1<::: 0 ~ ~ C ~ C C C C C C C C C C C C <IS <IS <IS <IS <IS <IS <IS <IS <IS <IS <IS <IS <IS <IS <IS rJ) 0 0 0 00 Ig~oo~~~e~~~~~~~~~~5~~~~~I~I~I~I~I~I~I~I~~~~~~~~EEEEiE ~Ø~.5WW~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~eeeeeeeeeeeeeee~~~~~5 =£~.wwEo~~~~~~~~~~!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~<IS<IS<IS<lSO<lS ...Q.oo~MMooÜ..oo_mM~"~M~S:~ØM~_WWWWWWWWWWWWWWWQ.Q.Q.Q.Q.Q. ~-8~~~N8~8~"-88~~M N--gg~~~~N8~N~-~M_~MN~8N~~ ~~N~"_~~~N~~~~W~~~~~~~~~~MMM~~~~;~~~~~;;~~~MM ~ II z 1ñ8 .~ II. 5! Ii:!~ !¥ g ~Q. o#- <IS C Z C C ~ I~ ,~ :ß ,~ rl~ ~ C CD ~m.2:Šj2ë~~as IIIOO<lS~O<lS<IS.r;£ mcroQ.roü~ooz E ~ § ~U ~W~¡¡¡-5 <lS1~ ~ ~ C ,- _ D ~eC1>-6~ ~<IS.c<lS= r::Eü~w ~ ~ ~ o <IS 0 5:2 æ o~.2 OQ.~ ~ ~~0~ I ~ :!! ~ -5 '1:: t: 0 0 :2000 oozoo ~ ãi ;:: ~ 00 ~ (¡¡ 'õ :> .;]- o -... If) ---- ~) III E II Z Ui II .... Ii:! !¥ ~ o III E II Z Ui ¡¡> 't: i!: II 0 c: -5 ~~ ~ ~ 0 ~ <IS ~ E DO O.c cr~ éi I::æ o E ....r; So~ c¥lQi'" l!¡¡¡~~ ~Oü::E W ~ ::E oðr~ ::E III~ 00 Wk I~ ~ ....00 ~ ü::E~ü ~0 z rãi~~ <IS~E ~ 'E "O::E ~~o ~~~~~Q.~~~~ 0 E- C S=co~~~o ~ ¡ê~¡¡¡ ~~ -5 "Oco~~~~>~<lSãic~ <IS~~-5o.r;I€CC~DO~"'~~cc2ª~~C~c~£3~~c~~ Eooc~~ocSO~O~~~~<lSo<lSo~~œe~O<lS'1::<U~5I11<1S0 ~crcr~ocr~~ooozcr~wür~crzow~r~~oo~Q.m>~~~ ¡:: 00 W ~ ¿ C 0 ~ ~ ... ::0 ~ ~ ,5 -gl g oocr::::¡ ~ o !!:! .~ 1û ~ ~ tV > géi:ßÌ "" 'C~>ª .!:!o ~""<IS ~'-~ "Oo=«S "C~~ .!! C.2:::Z C <IS > E:e~ 8z~õ~r55æ~£s: <IS C ~ C ~ ~ 0 Et::!:'$!2 <IS<IS=C ~::ES:Õ~ C o o C .c o ~ iií ~ S: rJ) := tV S: - o Ü g,!!! ~ - 0 ¡¡¡ 0.3 0 ¡¡¡ ClÜ_C 000 i! «~OOQ .E~.E E ;~-õ- c>c ~ II £R 00 rJ)~0 ~ z §~gg ~§~ éi æ Ui E~g¡g¡ œE~ I:: ~ ~ C ~-5g~~ ~~5~Oéi:ß"" oc I¿ ~ <IS =B 't:5!Ulcrcr21~~ü~I~~ i~~ ci~~ ¡¡¡~~...~ ... ~æc~~o'~~ C~ ~11~~!!lli§~§~I~<u£~~E:eI~~~~ill~~I~II~~~J~¡~~~)ltê~ oæ~s:00~~~~æ8z~~jr55æ~£s:8<~~~::Eø~5Œs:~s:0~::E~ffi~::E~ooð~ ~~§~~~Mm§~M§~~~"§~Nm§M88~~~~~NØW~-~~Nm~Nm§~M ~~;i~~~~i~~~~~~~~~ii~i~g~~~~II~i~~~~~~~~~~~~ Q~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~og~og -MMMMMMOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO I!~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ii~ii~~~~i~~ii~~~~~~~i ~ """ 8- "c W c: CI .2 c: '" .- .:; '5 00 ~~ .;'" c: '" ~~ Q.c: .2 II GIs:. > Q. C!S >oil) ~f/Ó c:_ ;:'9 E(W) EO 0::1 00 ... .. o 0 ..... C:" GI .!II E- t::g' != c!~ ~ (\/(\/ (\/ ;:; (\/(\/ ~è\i (')(') LOLO OLO LOLO LO(,) ..,. ..,...,. LOLO LOLO coco coco co coco coco c;;e;; C;; LOLO (\/(\/ ~~ :g~ ~~ ~~ a¡ a¡ a¡ a¡ a¡ a¡ a¡ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) C")C") (') (')(') (')(') (')C") (')C") (')(') '7'? (')C") (')co C? C")(') C")C") (')C") C")(') C")(') C") (')(') (')C") NN (\/c(, ~c\r NN (\/(\/ NN Nc\r Nt\, ..(\/ NN (\/(\/ CO(\/ c\¡J, ~(\/ NN c\rN NN NN Nc\, c(,(\/ dJN c\rN coco coco coco coco COLO coco coco coco OCO coco coco ..,.CO co..,. coco coco coco coco coco COco coco coco 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) (7)(7) co (7) (7)0) (7)(7) ..0) ~~ (7) CO (7)(7) (7)(7) (7)0) (7)(7) (7)(7) 0)0) 0)(7) (7)(7) ..,...,. ..,...,. ..,...,. ..,...,. ..,...,. ..,...,. ..,...,. ..,...,. ....,. ~~ ..,...,. co..,. ..,.(7) ..,...,. ..,...,. ..,...,. ~~ ..,...,. ""..,. ..,...,. ..,...,. C")C") (')(') (')(') (')(') (')(') (')C") (')C") (')(') co(') C")C") f"o.(') (').. (')..,. (')(') (')(') (')(') (')(') C")(') (W)(') C")C") (') ~ ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 X..J ...1>- ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. _u. u.u. u.u. I-u. u.Z u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. £ '" Q) Q) Q) Q) ~ ~ Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) ~ ~ ~ Q) Q) o Q) Q)"c Q) Q) Q) CI> Q) Q) Q) CI> CI> Q) CI> CI> CI> CI> CI> Q) CI> CI> o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 ~ f2 f:? ~ m ~ ~ g¡ e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e e ø êP êP êP Q) Q) Gi :s Q) G; Q) Q) êP Qi CI> Q) I'C ,!!! CI> Q) Q) Q) ,_ .c CI> CI> Q) Q) CI> CI> CI> Q) Q) Q) CI> CI> Q) CI> CI> Q) CI> Q) ã:ã: ã:ã: ã:ã: ã:ã: ã:ã: ã:ã: ã:ã: ã:ã: c:a. ã:ã: ã:ã: Giã: a. Q) ã:ã: ã:ã: ã:ã: ã:ã: ã:ã: ã:ã: ã:ã: ã:ã: ã:ã: !'ª 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: ~1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: ,~ 1:: 1:: f! 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: ææ o 0 ææ ææ o 0 o 0 ææ o 0 .. 0 ææ ææ c: 0 o 0 o 0 ææ ææ ææ o 0 o 0 ææ ææ ææ 0 u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. :Ju. :Ju. u.J: u.u. u.u. u.u. II) < ~ .. .. .. .. (') *w 0) UU UU 0 Õ U1:: .. 1::(') Õ Q) II) .. ,!!! ,!!! I'C I'C c: c: c: c: (\/ ;:, U ;:,* "C èñ 0) * 'C "C ...1...1 ...1...1 c: c: c: c: c: c: õõ ~õ õõ .. 0 0_ a:_ ÕÕ "'- õõ õõ õõ ÕÕ "C"C "C"C ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 UU g UU 8~ "'u ÕÕ õõ õ c: c: c: c: '" '" '" '" I'C I'C I'C I'C I'C I'C $ ~g¡ I'C I'C I'C I'C :.;::~ ".;:::I -.:;: c: c: c: c: c: c: '" '" ~ ~ '" II) rJ II) '" II) '" II) rJ '" '" '" '" rJ '" II) '" '" '" '" '" )( )( )( )( e e e e I'C I'C I'C I'C I'C I'C '" '" '" II) '" II) '" II) 'c: '" '" rJ rJ '" '" '" '" '" '" II) '" '" '" '" II) III CI> Q) CI> CI> o 0 I'C 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 I'C 0 o 0 u. 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 0 !! « « ;:, ;:, ::I ::I c: c: c: c: c: c: ~~ U~ ~~ ~~ a. ~~ ¡¡;~ ~~ ..,.~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ I'C I'C I'C I'C I'C I'C I'C I'C I'C I'C (\/co 0..,. a. a. a. a. 11)11) 11)11) 11)11) f"o.LO ¡g~ f"o.LO (').. .. LO(') I-f"o. LO(,) c;;a¡ (\/..,. coo (\/..,. coo (\/..,. coo (\/ "C ..,.C") (')(\/ f"o.(') ..f"o. 8~ ¡gg ..f"o. ~~ ~~ ~~ ; ~~ 0(7) 0)(7) (7)(7) (7)C") ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ LO "C (7)(7) (7)(7) COf"o. 00 coco ..,.CO ""f"o. f"o.f"o. f"o.f"o. f"o.f"o. f"o.CO co cr LOLO LOLO (')(') ..,...,. ..,.(') (')C") (')C") LOLO ..LO LOLO LOLO co LOLO ..LO LOLO LOLO LOLO LOLO LOLO LOLO LO GI E III Z 1ií .. < ¡¡: ~en <3: w < ~ en< I'C '" I- I'C >,!!! Q) ! ~ .c ~ _ c: 'õ 2! '" 'c: ,5 Q) c: e I'C-¡: e ~ .¡: 0 'ê ¡¡¡ 'ê ~ N ,- CUO § I'C := .c I'C I'C 0'- I'C 0 ~ wen U:i£ a.a < :> ..,> U GI E III Z .. IOC III 'ã: III IE CI> ...I It ~ ~ "'~ 0 ¡¡ c: c: ::I c: "C ~ '" - ... ! 'C: Q) CI> I'C I~ c: .. c: .~ I'C c: Q) Q) Q) ~ c: 1J c: .c '" c: e :::.c > ~ o Õ 2 ::I CI> I'C o 0 U3 ~ 0 0 i= II) C)C)II) C) C) :i£en a: II E 1\1 Z 1ií .. ~ ¡¡: a: C) < .., :i£ U - 'E U U '" CI> I'C .. 1:: "ª 1:: "ª < II) a 1:: c: I'C "C 0 """) c: GI Q) CI> ~ ~ ~ Q) '~ E ¡¡; 'C: c: .. '6 c: .c CI> .c CI> :; .c 0 c: ¡¡; s:..J!! :u ~ II) '" 0 0 0 0 "C co 0 I'C .c 0 Q) o.c 0 a: """) a: .., C) ~ w a. a: ~ I- a II) """)CI> a 0 I"ª e :i£ ~ co I'C CI> c: ... Q) "C CI> C co '" g 0 2! II) 0 I- 0 I'C .., ,¡g 'g ,~ ::I .c a: ';:: co < co en 'õ en Iã: ~ c: en .= I~ Q) I'C::: ~ - .., ~ CI> W c: C).c 'E CI> ~ "ª u. c: It: ~ I'C Cl>a. c: ~ II) Õ ,5 ~ GI ~ ëij 31 c: c: ¿ CI> !~ ~ E w ., c: I'C 0 0 ãj g¡ Gi ~æ E ~ W ~ en I'C rJ I'C II) .!!! Q) e ~ III U. I'C ë c: E 'f¡j J: CI> c: 'c: ~ ::I CI> E c: ... 2! Q) c: c: II) ¡¡; CI> ~ ,~ z ¿ I'C 'C: ~ ~ co '" Q) 0 '~ I'C c: ~ ~ ~ Gi co Q) !~ ãj II) '8 co 1ií loc II) .c '3 ~ ~ I'C ë I'C "C ... 0 Q) 'e ~ c: ~ § > Q) Iã: .Q 'S .c § E 0 ãi c: ~ Æ U z en co (!) ~ III I- I'C > "C::: ~ IE Q) en b ~ < b a I- CI> en IE I~ ¡¡; (!) en CI> a 0 a. I'C a. {? Q) """) ::I.c ., - en (!) ::I c: .c II) I'C """) c: ~ ~ ~ ¡¡ !~ .., ~ .s 1'Ca. - '" 0 < c: J: Q) Q) U ¡¡ c: '3 c: "C ... '" ... p rJ '6 co CI> I- ~ c: Q) a: rJ U 1:: (!) .. .. 0 c: rJ ~ Gi :2 ;g c: 2! ,5 ~ c: ~ ! 'c: CI> Q) I'C E I~ c: ~ c: ~ III CI> Q) c: 'e! co I'C .!!! 'C: ~ e =' ~ 0 g c: c: ~ Q) c: e ...31 c: rJ c: Q) Q) '~ c: '6 U E I'C ~ "C ::I ::I '3 c: .c ~ .c Q) Q) c: .c I'C > ¡¡; c: ëij ~ ë .c .!!! 0- ~ Õ 2 e -5 ::I co CI> CI> c: ~ I'C I'C III '6 I'C I'C 0 c: 0 0 ãj 8 ~~ .c CI> 0 :'i co 0 0 3: I'C .c 0 0 i= II) C) C) II) (!) (!) :i£ en U3 ~ u. a: en .., W C) ~ :::¡ ~ C) w ~ W U w ~ a. a. U < < :::¡ .., W a: a: J: ij op LO (\/ (7) <9 C? 9 f"o. f"o. ..,. § op LO (\/ 0) '9 (\/ (7) <9 C") (') 9 f"o. ..,. .. op LO (\/(7) 0 f"o. ..,. co LO ~ ~ 0 f"o. ~ I § f"o. 8 § § § 8 8 8 § § ~ 8 § § § 0 § 6 8 6 6 0 6 8 6 8 § 66 8 8 8 § 8 8 § § § ~ 8 8 8 ~ ~ ~ 88 ~ ~ ~ ~ J¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ 6 .. N rh ~ J¡ .;, LO .;, r:- eD en 6 C;; ~ ~ 8 J¡ .;, ~cò f6 ~ ~ ¡g f"o. 18 f"o. :§! f"o. co ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (\/ (\/ (\/ ~ ~ (') ~ ~ C")C") LO LO (7) (\/ (\/ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~~ (\/ (\/ (\/ (\/ (\/ (\/ (\/ (\/ (\/ (\/ (\/ (') C") 9 9 g g g g g g g g g g g ~ ~ ~ f"o. !:5 ~ f"o. ~ f"o. f"o. f"o. ~ f"o. f"o. f"o. ~ f"o. ~ f"o. f"o. f"o. f"o. f"o. f"o. ~ ~ f"o. f"o. f"o. f"o. f"o.f"o. 0 :5 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 :5 0 0 0 0 0 0 :5 0 :5 0 00 e ¡¡;¡ ¡¡;¡ :5 ¡¡;¡ ¡¡;¡ ¡¡;¡ ¡¡;¡ ¡¡;¡ ¡¡;¡ ¡¡;¡ ¡¡;¡ ¡¡;¡ LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LOLO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 6 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 66 )C .. - .. .. .. .. .. .- .. .- .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .- .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .- .. .. .. .. .. .. .- .. .- It!! ..,. ..,. ~ ..,. ..,. ..,. ~ ~ ~ ..,. ..,. ~ ..,. ~ ~ ~ ..,. ..,. ~ ..,. ~ ~ ..,. ..,. ~ ~ ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. ~ ..,. ..,. ~ ..,. ~ ~ ..,. ..,...,. (') C") (') (') C") (') (') (') C") (') (') (') (') C") (') (') (') C") C") C") (') (') C") (') C") (')C") '-" ..J II 01 'tJ W C 01 o c :~ ~ õCJ ~~ -'" c '" ~~ o.c .2111 11.1: > a. !S »(1) =ai c... ::I~ Eo ~:) CJCJ ~ vv vv vv vv vv vv U)U) U)U) IX) IX) IX) IX) co IX) IX) 1'-1'- 1'-1'- 1'-1'- 1'-1'- coco co coco U)U) U)U) U)U) U)U) U)U) u)LO U)U) U)U) ~ ~ ~ ~* ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ U)U) U) U)U) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0) 0)0) C')C') C')C') C')C') C')C') C')C') C')C') C')C') C')C') C') C') C') C?~ C') C') C')C') C')C') C')C') C')C') C')C') C') C')C') C\IC\I NN NN NN NN NN Nc\i NN ~~ NC\I ~C\I ~~ C\I... ~C') C\I~ NN NN NN NN Nc\, C\~ NN IX) co IX) IX) IX) IX) IX) IX) IX) IX) IX) IX) IX) IX) IX) IX) IX) IX) IX)C') IX) IX) IX) IX) IX) IX) IX) IX) ex) IX) IX) ex) O)U) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0) IX) ~¡:: O)U) IX) 0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0) 0) 0)0) IX) 0) 0)0) vO vv vv ~~ vv vv v "II' "11'"11' v "II' ~~ "11'0) "11'0) O)V "11'"11' "ll'v "11'"11' "11'"11' "ll'v O)V vv C')C') C')C') C')C') C')C') C')C') C')C') C')C') C')v C')O C')v ~C') C')C') C')C') C')C') C')C') C')C') ~C') C')C') C')... C') C')C') C') ~ 1ii ...I> ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...I"') ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 ...1...1 êi5 u.z u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.z u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II ~ ~ II II II II II II II II 'õ II II II ~ II II II II II II II II II II II II !:! g ~ ~ e e £::? e £::? e !:! !:! e e e e e ~ e e £::?ëa !:! o ::I e e !:! ... e e 12 e £::? e o 0 e e £::? e Q II II II Q Q II II Q II II II Q II II èD èD II Q II II £"g II 1ii..J II II Q II II Q II Q Q Q êÞ êi; Q II Q II ä: ï: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:1i ä:U5 ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: I~ 1:: ïii 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::Jg 1:: ~ 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: 1::1:: æ '" o 0 o 0 ææ o 0 ææ o 0 o 0 ææ ææ o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 ææ o 0 ææ o 0 ææ o 0 o 0 o 0 CJ 0 u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.:I: u.:I: u.a. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. « '9 II) ~ II) v 0 'ë: U) ... ... U C') ... - ... :J! :J - 1:: 'ë: ... ... 0 0 COO co 00 co CO cc ~ 'ë: ::I :J 00 0 e - :J ... _ 0 GG G G G G GG GG GG GG :J! :J! :J! Q ~è!i :J!ii: :J! I!! :J! :J! :J! :J! :J! :J! :J! :J! :J! :J!G GU GG G G Iii UU 'tJ E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E E e e e e: e e: o II e e e e e e e e e e E E E E E E I- d: ... ::I (/ \'IS \'IS \'IS \'IS g¡ \'IS \'IS \'IS \'IS \'IS \'IS \'IS \'IS \'IS \'IS \'IS Q Q Q llLO II II -81,g II II Q II Q II II II Q Q co \'IS \'IS \'IS \'IS g¡ (/ II Q Q Q II Q ~ II II Q Q II Q II Q 'tJ'tJ 'tJ 'tJv "gl ~ 'tJ'tJ 'tJ'C 'tJ 'C'C 'tJ'tJ 'tJQ II ~ II Q '" 0 J: 00 00 0 0 0 00 00 00 00 e: e: e: 0 e: )( e: e: e: e: e: e: e: e: e: e: e: e: ... 00 00 0 '" ~ -'" 0 o 0 0 0) d:S o ... 0« o 0 o 0 0 o 0 o 0 00 2! I'-U) I'-U) a. a. a. C\I a. II a. IX) a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. a. co IX) 0 ex) v ð I'-U) C')... I'- U) C') ~ C')... C')... v > C\lCO 'tJ U) ~~ ~~ ~ ffl ~ ~~ ~~ 0)0) 0)0) OC\l V co 00 8~ è!i8 OC\l v ~¡;¡j C\lv æ~ ~~ ffl~ ~ 'tI ex) 1'-1'- 1'-1'- ;~ ~ ~ ~a. C\lW ¡¡;u:; u; C\IC\I C U) ... U)U) U) U) U) u)LO LOll) U)U) U)1l) vI'- 1l)C\I 1l)U) U)U) U)1l) Il)Il) U)U) Il) ~ III Z ! ü: \':! GI C ~ 0 GI E III Z Ui j \':! GI C ~ 0 ~ III Z ! ¡¡: (/ ... ~ :J! .. II ! e: 'ë: ,Q (/ ~ II - '" l:I N \'IS 0 (ij e: "!! § '3: 'ë: a. i5 32 .I: - - 0 ~ ë - ~ - - - II - - 0 - ~ - (/ - 3: c: ~ 0 'C ~ 'E e: ,ë 0 0 ~ c: ~ ..Q II N a. "ª .c € 'Ë II 0 if E ãí II ::I j ãi II .I: e: e: ...I (ij ~ \'IS ~ 2 "') Ìii e: 0 co e II e ~ :2 II co 0 ~ .~ rn ~ e: Iii w rn IJ ~ II: II) ,E -'" 'õ co II 'õ II Q .I: ãi Ìii II Iii -E e: e: -E :I: U "') U a. Q u. II: Q ~ ~ I!! e: 'e: ::: ::: Õ ~ ù: e: co \'IS \'IS ãi 0 ~ e: 1:: I!! \'IS ~ II Q 8 IJ S II rn ,g¡ L1. ~ U. a. U N ~ ¡¡¡ ~ e: Q L1. .~ 'C c: II 32 ~ 'ë: -= !:!:! « \'IS I~ « .c e: co g 0 « 'õ co ~ g :I: 0 ~ co a Q E e: IJ S S Ìii I!! "!! II: ~ e: 32 GI IJ I!! ~ ::I co (/ E II: :ª Q c: "!! e: if 'tJ 'tJ ...I 0 .c :J! 'õ is e: ~ Q \'IS 0 « II II 1 ãi g rn 'Ñ II ~ II e: .~ S E e: III II '1: II II: II) U. .I: e: 'ë: ~ II -'" j ~ \'IS ~ 'Ë 11; 'Ë I~ e: .c \'IS e: e: ë \'IS II 8 II e: ¡¡:: e: ~ N 'ë: ~ IJ e: e: co if .I: Z \'IS a. e e: ~ 0 0 IJ IJ ~ e: e: II .g \'IS æ s e: .I: 0 Õ ~ II co e 0 :2 § "ª 1:: ~ .c 0 1ii (ij ~ E 'E :I: I: ~ II II II ~ d! C) II) ~ co 0 :5 ~ ~ è3 II Iii a. ãi j ~ ::I -'" \'IS ~ 'tI ::I ~ I: ~ rn ¡:: co 11 õ ãi co j II U ~ ,ë if ~ 0 ~ u. ~ 0 :I: W ~ II ~ « æ E <d :I: Iii ~ U a. « u. u. ãi :I: ::I C) co e: a. e: U ~ II: ¡¡¡ a. ~ ~ "') \'IS c: ...I > ,!!! I- ~ 1:: IJ II) IJ 0 U. e: !!! I- 'ã) « 'C co ... « Q; ãi ~ ...I Q; ~ .c .8 C) C) ~ ~ II C) \'IS ~ E "ª CD II ~ ~ l- e: .. (/ a. ,~ ~ "') ~ co ~ j¡ :I: j¡ 1:: :g GI 1.2: \'IS E 'tI ...I -'" Q \'IS 0 :§ 1: -E II ¡; 0 ~ ~ 'E ~ .I: I~ e: \'IS e: co C .I: e: ~ 'tI e: E .I: CD \'IS II: "') 0 IJ ~ e: ,Q 0 3: e: CD ::: (ij e: (ij .I: e: CD CD )( ~ õ 0 \'IS 0 CD I!! 0 :g Iii co co \'IS S II: 'ã) 0 I!! :; õ co I: (ij IJ co \'IS c: .I: '5 e: .c ãi CD ãí ~ co ~ 0 II 0 0 § 0 3: 3: 0 3: « 0 ~ U U « z u. "') "') > "') ~ II: ..!: rn "') ~ II: "') W U. "') 0 "') :> rn ~ « rn "') ~ « "') II: « :I: « a. ~ ~ C') 9 I'- 'Y § C9 U) C\I 0) 0) ~ C') 9 ";- 'Y § ~ ~ C') 9 ~ 'Y § ~ ex) ij C\I 0) ~ C') 9 I'- 'Y 'Y ~ IX) ij C\I 01 ~ <?9 8 8 ~ 8 § 8 8 § § § § ~ 6 ~ 8 8 8 § 8 ~ ~ § § ~ 6 0 6 8 8 6 6 § 0 00 ~ 8 8 ~ 8 ~ 8 88 en 6 ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ en 6 ~ C\I C') ~ ob :ß C') ~ ob <b I'- IX) en 0 N C\I M ~ U) <b ,.:. IX) en 6 C;; N C') v ob <b ~~ C') è!i è!i e U) e Il) U) ... ... ... ... ... ... ... C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\I C\ C\I C') C') C') C') C') C') C')C') 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 99 9 9 9 I:i I'- I'- I:i I'- I:i I'- ~ I:i I'- ~ ~ I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I:i ~ ~ I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- ~ I:i ~ I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- ~ I'- !:; I'- 1'-1'- 0 0 0 0 g 0 g 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 g g ~ 0 g 0 0 g g g 0 g gg e Il) Il) U) U) LO Il) Il) U) LO LO LO U) U) U) U) LO U) U) U) LO LO U) U) LO 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 66 M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :; ~ ~~ I¡!! C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') - .. ~.2 cUi GI ._ E- t:0I ca..!: 0.= !~ ~ """ II CI '0 W c: CI .2 c: .~ § cO 6~ ';111 c: III ~~ o.c: .S! II ~.c: c!!! >00 :t::cõ C:... ê~ ECI 8B Õ" _.2 c:- II .!!! E- t::g' II .- 0.= C!!~ ~ lOCO (\«) (\(\ (\(\ (\... (\(\ C') C')C') g C')C') C')en en en en"" en() (\ (\«) (\(\ (\(\ (\(\ LI')... ~&j ~~ ~~ ~s;¡ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ !'- !,-... !'-!'- !'-!'- !'-!'- en en en eno en() ()en en en C')... C')!'- C')C') C')C') C')... C')C') C') C')C') en C')C') C')C') C')C') C')... C')C') C') C')... C')C') C')C') C')C') ~~ NN (\(\ NN NN ~~ NN (\(\ N(\ (\(\ NN (\..t Nc\, Nc\, NN N~ NN (\N N~ NN Nt\, NN coco coco coco coco coco coco COco co.,. coco co'" coco coco coco coo coco COCO co!'- coco coco coco ~8 ()() en en ()en en en enC') en en en en en en ~8 en en en~ en en en en en en ~~ ()() en en en() en() ()en en en """" """" """" ~~ .,.... """" """" """" """" """" "".,. .,."" .,."" ",,"" ""0 """" """" """" C')... C')C') C')C') C')C') C')... C')C') C')C') C')C') C')"" C')C') ~... C')C') C')C') C')C') C')C') C')C') C')... C')C') C')C') C')C') ~ ...J>- ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J>- ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J>- ...J...J ...J>- ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...JI- ...J...J ...J...J ...J>- ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J êij u.z u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.z u.u. u.u. u.u. u.~ u.u. u.z u.u. u.u. u.u. u.o u.u. u.u. u.z u.u. u.u. u.u. '0 Ie ~ o æ ::::I C) C) C) C) ~ ~ C) C) C) C) B C) C) C) c),C C) C) C) C) C) B B C) C) B C) C) C) II C)= C) C) C) C) C) C) ~1ñ ~ e e e e e ~ ~ .. e e ~ C) 2 ~ e 2 ~ '" 2 f::? e e e 2 2 2 o III 2 2 e 2 2 e ,g¡'g CD CD ",C Qj> C)- C) C) C) C) o C) C) C) C) C) C) C) C) 0 ,g¡ c: C) C) C)- C) C) o C) ,g¡ 0 C) C) C) C) o 0 C) 0 o 0 ä: ij ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä: ã; ä:ä: ,- III ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä: g ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: a.:E a. ! a.¡¡: a.0 I~ t::- t::t:: t::t:: t::t:: t::t:: t:: '" t::t:: t::t:: t::ä: t:: :it t::t:: 51,2 t::t:: t::t:: t::t:: t:: '" t::t:: t::t:: t::: "¡:: t::t:: t::t:: t::t:: oS o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o.a o 0 ¡f¡f ¡fu: ¡f3 ¡f¡f ¡f¡f o 0 o 0 o 0 ¡f¡f o 0 ¡f~ o 0 ¡f¡f o 0 CJ u.rn u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.1X) u.u. u.u. u.o u.u. u.u. u.u. « "" "" '2 00 "" «)«) ü "" ;:) C')C') - .. ÜÜ '0_ ÜÜ ÜÜ Ü """" _ãi ÜÜ 0_ a:o - - - - - - - - 0Ü ÜÜ 'CÜ ÜÜ ÜÜ cc 00 CO 032 0 'Co 0 0 0 0 00 O~ 00 'C 0 'C 'tI'C 'C'C 'C >- 'ãja: c: 0 ãi C) ãi ãiãi ãiãi ãi Ü ãi iÏiãi ãi ãi ãi ãi ãiãi >= II C)= Jj~ ãiãi 'ãj::¡ ãiãi 'ãj :J :J :J :J .. :J :J :J'E 'E':: 'E 'E'E 'E'E 'E « 0 I: C) IX) I: ~ -~ ~ ~ ~ i ii ,C O,C 0 ,C,C ,C .c.c .c 0 2 e e e o 0 o :it 0 o C) o C) 0 E C) ~ 0 'E~ J: 0 0'C C) Qj eo .. E E 0 E E E E E E III > 0 0 0 0 C) 0 o C) o I: o 0 o C) ~ B o C) ~ E 0« I: I: I: I: I: I: I: I: I: C') I: I: o I: I: I: I: E I: I: I: ::::I I: I: I:'C 'C'C 'C'C E= E E E E E E III .. C) 0 ::::I 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 !'- 0 0 co 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o I: I: I: I: ::::I I: I: I: ::::I ::::I~ ::::I ::::I :I ::::I ::::I :I III o- J: rnJ: J: J: J: J: J:J: !'-J: J: C')J: J:J: J:J: J:J: J:O J:J: J: 0 o 0 O...J o 0 om rnw rn rnrn rnrn rn I!! o III !'- (\C') C') ~ !'- LI') C')... ";'LI') C') ...(\ ""«) co.,. ""«) co!'- ""«) co a. a. a. a. C) a. a. a.C') !'- C')... en!'- C') '0 ~~ ~ o~ ~ ~ 1ó 1ó1ó II)(\ (\ ~~ ~~ ~~ 1ó1ó ~~ (\(\ (\LI') C')... g¡o C')... enC') ~~ (\ ~~ 1ó1ó LI') '0 !'-CO co coco f8ìõ LñLñ (\(\ ...co co co « LI') lOLl') LI') LI') LI') LI')LI') ...LI') LI') LI')LI') LI')... LI')LI') LI')LI') Ll')en LI')LI') LI')LI') LI')... LI') LI')LI') LI') II E II Z ~ ¡¡: ~ II c: 3t 0 ~ II Z - III II ...J ~ ell c: 3t 0 II E II Z 1ii .. ¡¡: ... ::: .. ! C) I~ ~ ,~ 0 0 !¡g '" 0 ~ 'E Qj 0 :I - 0 a. - I: I-- I-- I~ I: - '2 :; :ü I: III ~ III I: I: ~ '" :ü ~ 9 I~ :ë I~ :I 0 rn I: '2 C) e '" J: I: 0 0 .c: ãi « III ~ IX) ::::I 0 '" a: '2 'C 1: 'ª I: ...J E :I 0 '" '" ~ õ 0 :§ '> Q, ãi J: ã3 C) C) 0 a: C) 0 '¡¡j « S 0 CI> E 0 ¡: I: I: "" ~ C) III cD ::::I 0 Æ C) :it ,!g a. 0 III III 0 rG ~ 0 a¡ .c: ~ :; 'C C) æ £ 0 ëi5 ~ > ã) :I I~ È ãi 0 ,C rn .., .., c: :!2 « u. ~ u. .9 e J: I~ w III '~ '0 III ,C IX) I~ ,C .c: ::::I CÌ5 ::!: III I~ III 0 0 ...J ~ ~ C) ~ ,~ 0 ...J Õ -0 III "5 u. 0 I: a ¡¡¡ I: 'C () CÌ5 13 0 ~ .!!!. a: CI> ¿ I: 0 0 0 E ::!: III ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ ::!: C) 'I: 0 "" 8 0 .i£ '" ~ 5J ~ 0 ~ E iii I: 0 ~ 0 .. '" ~ 'E « ~ a. III I: I: ,!g '~ III II I~ 0 "C~ '" Qj I: I: I: ~ :Ii I: f!! I: 0 ãi '2 B I~ a. I'~ .., I: ",!E 0 0 III 0 ª '" ,!!! a: I: 0 0 z .!2 I: I: J: .., ~ .c: 0 9 ~ '" .c: 0 0 Æ 8 '¡¡j 0 'C ;:: ~ I: ~ ~ I: 0 :I 1: ::::I I: I: :I 0 C "C 1ii III º I: 0 III III 0 0 > ~ a CI> ~ .!!!. "" :§ 0 ~ 0 õ ª go '> !!! ;:: J: l:g 0 C) I: '> rn ¡¡¡ ~C) J: ~ ãi E E ::!: E 0 .., .., III I: a rG :I ::!: a: ::::I :I III III ::!: ~ :I a. a. C) 0 ::!: 0 S2 .S! III U. IX) u. ::!: E ~ u. a. II 0 0 ã) IX) Qj III 0 ::!: .., S2 ~ w C) ::!: 0 .., a. ~ rn IX) ::!: ::!: rn C) ~ w a: a: ::::I ! 'E ãi > a ::!: ~ £ {g CI> CI> 'E '" ::!: '" I;š 'E :it ,- :E ~ ~ ...J I~ ...J iii III 'ª W .., III t:: '1: ...J ::!: ::!: I: III III C) ãi « 'ª III 0 ~~ ! "" I: I: 0 ~ ~ III "" C) I: ~ I: 'E '" 'C CI> I: ,~ III III 0 E 0 III E .c: I~ I: J: -.:::: I: .c: I: 0 C) I: .5 .c: I: 'I: I: 0 CI> '5 ':; e I: ,C III ~ .c: .c: I!! 'I: 0 .c: Õ 0 I: e 0 0 ä¡ .c: "5 !!! ãi ãi III 0 I!! III Æ ãi S ! ~ 0 "5 III E III '" .c: '" 3t :E 0 lIS 0 ~ ~ lIS c3 0 lIS .3 0 0 III c3 .c: .c: c3 III 0 00 0 rn .., a: u. J: J: :::!: e( a J: rn u. :::!: .., J: N rn 0 IX) a: ::!: ...J ã: a: ::!: I- « :> l- e( a: IX) .., ...J ii5 .., .., !'- !'- "T § cp ~ LI') (\ () <9 <? 9 9 I';' "T § ~ ~ ~ ~ <9 C') C') 9 !'- "T ~ cp ~ (\ en <9 <9 C') 0 !'- "" ~ co II) (\ ~ ~<9 6 6 ~ 8 6 6 § 8 0 8 8 ~ 8 ~ § § ~ § ~ 8 6 6 8 8 6 § § 6 § § § 8~ 8 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ en 6 ~ N c? C') .,. LI') cb ,.:. co en 6 ìõ ~ c? "" LI') :ß !'- f8 en g Cõ N C') .,. oJ¡ :8 !'- ~ en 6 r:: N c? "" LI') !è ,.:. eX> 6... C') .,. "" "" "" "" .,. "" "" "" "" LI') LI') LI') LI') II) II) «) «) «) «) «) «) !'- !'- !'- !'- !'- !'- !'- !'- coco 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 99 ~ ~ !'- !:; !'- !'- !'- ~ !'- !'- !'- !'- !'- !'- !:; !:; !'- !'- !'- !:; ~ !'- !:; !'- !'- !'- !'- ~ !'- ~ !'- !'- ~ !'- !'- !'- !:; !:; !'- !'- !'- !'- ~~ g 0 0 0 s;¡ 0 0 s;¡ 0 0 0 0 0 s;¡ s;¡ 0 0 0 s;¡ 0 0 0 s;¡ 0 0 0 0 0 e II) '9 LI') LI') LI') LI') LI') II) LI') LI') LI') II) LI') II) II) LI') It) '9 It) It) It) It) It) It) It) II) It) It) 6 6 6 6 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 66 M ~ ~ :;¡: :;¡: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :;¡: ~ ~ :;¡: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :;¡: :;¡: ~ ~ ~ :;¡: ~ ~ :;¡: ~ ~; ~ C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C') C')C') \.I -..I 8. 'tI W e 01 .2 e 1/1 .- .:; ~ ëo äi il/l ~~ D.e .2111 1I.s:: >D. ~~ ~cD e... ::19 EI") EO 8i3 õ õ -- e- II .!II E- t:g' 3.= ~~ ~ 01... C\lLO oco ,... LO LOLO LOLO LOOI 0101 0101 COOl I") 01") ~~ MM MM ~ ~ 8 8M 8 MOl 0 ,...,... g ,...,... ,...,... S;ð: ð:ð: ð:ð: ~ð: ,... ~S; ,...,... ,...,... M.., 0101 0101 en en en 01 en enOl MM ... MM LO MM MM MM MM MM 'YC? M (\M ~M MM M M M 8 8~ ~ .(\ Nt\¡ CDN NN NN NN NN NN ~(\ ..,~ ~~ NN Nt\, NN ~o ON NO NN ...co coco (\LO coco coco coco coco coco MCO LOCO coco coco (\~ OM (\en 01 en ¡¡;¡~ 01 en 01 en 01 en 0101 en en ,...en Men 001 0101 01 en 01 en 0101 en co COOl coco CO(\ LOCD ;::~ è!iè!i è!iè!i ..,.., ..,.., ..,.., ..,.., co.., LO.., ..,.., ..,.., ..,.., ..,.., ..,en en en 0101 en en en~ en co MM MM MM MI") MM OM ~M ..,M MM MM MM M'" ..,.., ..,.., ..,.., ..,.., ..,~ M MM MM MM MCO (')0 ~ >...J >...J J:...J a ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ""')...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...JI- ...J< ...J...J zu. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. u.u. zu. zu. OU. U.U. U.U. U.U. U.U. U.U. U.U. U.U. U.::> U.::E U.U. 1/1 'E CD .2 e CD I,~ 1/1 ä: CD Q¡ ~ CD E CD CD Q) ~~ 1; CD CD CD CD CD 8 8 Q) CD CD > CD CD,j CD 1; Q) Q) CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CDU Q) 0 (¡j CD ~ e ::I 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !:? ,- 0 ~32 o ::I e f2 f2 ~ ~ ~ i,£ !:è, ,£ 'E 0 I~ ...J ~ ø Q) CD a: Q¡'tI Q¡...J o 0 o 0 ~~ o Q) CD Q) CD 0 <ñ£ CD CD CD Q) CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD Q) Q) Q) êü ~.s:: Q) ~ ä:ä: ä:.o ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: .- 'tI ä:,g ä:~ ä:<ñ ä:ä: ä:ä: ä:ä: U U U ,g¡ U 'tI Q) ~ Q. Q) ä:ä: ä:ä: .- ca ::I .- I~ 0 1:1: 1: E 1:1: 1:1: 1:1: 1:1: 1:1: 1:i!: 1: 1/1 1: CD 1:1: 1:1: 1:1: 1:1: E E E Q....J Q..s:: ,j~ e o 0 o Q) o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 ææ oE o.s:: æee ææ o 0 o 0 (¡j (¡j 1:1: (¡j 1:1: 1:~ 1:1: 0 m U.U. U.Q. Q.U. U.U. U.U. U.U. U.U. U.Q. u.en U.U. U.U. ææ o 0 æ~ o 0 _ 0 Q. Q. Q. U.U. U.Z U.U. U. r~ r.:. ~ ~ .:: U".. 1-1- 'tI .., - CD > "*' U > ~ ~ ~ Q) 0 m ü üü üü üü 'tI- üü üü 'tI_ Q) CD Q) CD <ñ (\ ;; QiU ~U mü ü ü üü üü !!! !!! !!! ð CD ~'tI 'tI 'tI'tI I 'tI'tI 'tI'tI 'E:2 'tI'tI 'tI'tI m'tl ffl.'t:J ~'tI 'tI 'tI'tI 'tI'tI ~u U U CD èñ !:?a: Qi QiQi QiQi QiQi QiQi QiQi ,5 ~ 'tIQi 0- Qi QiQi QiQi ~.! e CD~ Q) m Q) 'C 'C Q) 1/1 'E 'E'E ...J 'E'E 'E'E 'E'E 'E'E a:'E ~'E 5~ 'E'E 'E'E ~I I ~I a: E CD o Q) CD 1/1 gJ: C E c <ñ Q) Q) CD ca CD Q) CD Q) E E CD CD Q) CD Q. E - Q) ::I CD Q) Q) Q) Q) C 1/1 ca 19C\l E32 E E E c en E E E E E E E E = E .s:: E .!!I E E E E E ,- Q) Q)'C Q)'tI g'tl :E .s:: E E E § ::> E E E E ~ E E E E E f!! E J: E i!: E .21 E E E E E .s::m mCD 'C m CD E .§ð; o c ~;: Q) 1: CD UCD 1/1 <õ ::I :;J ::I ,j en ::I :;J :;J ::I ;:~ ::I ::I :;J :;J Q) :;J 'C ::I ca ::I 't: :;J :;J :;J ::I ::I ;:U. U. ;:U. 0U. J: ""') 1/1 ,... en en en en en en en en en en en i!:en 8en Q.en caen en en en en ~en o )( ::cri 2! (\ ca.., Uo en en en en en I-en en ~s LO en ~~ ~ 0 CDO (\.., IDO (\.., IDO ;:0 (\.., C\I(\ ~~ 'tI (õ ~ 8 ~ì8 ã;(Õ ...(\ (\(\ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ LOLO ~~ 8~ ,...en en ,...en en en LO 8è\i 'tI .., ~~ ~~ oco oco ~ oco 88 ,... ~O c( ~ LO LOLO ... ~ LOLO LOLO MLO ~LO LOLO (\.., ..,en ..,01 0 ..,,... (') MLO LO MLO ~ID ID (\Q. M(\ II E III Z ! ü: ~ 0 0 0 en II I~ I~ « I~ <~ e g¡ g¡ g¡ æ ~ 0 ,j ,j :.J::J ,j ::JLt II E III Z - 1/1 ~ ~ ! c: c .~ .! c ,g¡ ~ CD CD Q) ,þ ::I ~ 1/1 1/1 i)'Gj 1/1 Õ Õ Õ Q) 0 0 Q.Q. Q....J II ~~ = ~= E 0 ~ 0 till "2B Qi 'CQi Z ~~ 1/1 = 1/1 - ::J ::E:.J r! oð oð <oð oð oð ü: Qi I'? .s:: .s:: U. U. CDW U. W en c ... E c: c: 'E 'E 'E ~ Q. ~ ~ CD ~~ is ~ 'C ca II c: ,~ ~ c: ca ca ca ~ Õ"ª :; e ~ ca ca ca .s:: .s:: Qio '§ 0 .S! 'ë ~ !:? CD .2 0 0 1/1 CD Q) ~ Q) 1/1 0 ð Q. Q. if if :.J(! if (! Q) ca_ :;J 0 !!I 'ã) l- i-- I!! 'iIj Qi Q. Q. Q. J:en ""') 'C ;: 'Iii w 'c: 0 ca (! .2 'C 'C J: Q. 0 0 ,!!! c: < ::E :; U ë ë ~ < < ~ 'C q; E ca !3 (! c: ::E ca ca e :ª Q) ~ ca :;J 0 ::E J: J: q; 0 .e < 'C 1/1 'C en '2 jjj CD ~ .5 i:5 '5 0 ~ e ca m ~ c: Q¡ Q¡ I:j 0 Qi U '0 ca c: en E E ~ jjj c: ...J ca 1/1 c: c: Qi c: Q) 'c: ,!J U Q) W 'ã) 'ã) ~ .e c: CD E ca > iii 5 ""') U. .s:: .s:: CD CD ~ 0 ~ Q. CD 'iii E c: ""') j ca ""') ., Q. a .2 ¿ c: c: ~ ''ª ,~ (! ~ ~ Q) '2 1/1 CD c: E ~ Q) 'iIj ~ g ]! ~ ~ œ CD "8 Q) 1/1 c: 1/1 0 0 ~ c: Z c: :; ~ 32 !:? "9 g ~ Q¡ '5 'ã) ca I!! .2 'C '" ca ca e ::I c: ca I~ Q¡ 0 J: !!I ~ ~ .e 'C (¡j c: ::I 0 c: Q. Q. ;: ~ E ~ Vi > ;: ca 0 ;: :; 1: I!! I:~ en 'c: U ca N Õ S .e en 8 (! J: :;J ca ca U ""') ""') ~ E ~o ~ m CD (! jjj ~ (! ca Q) :iE Q. .e Q. Z m :iE U ::E u U J: ""') Q) CD 0 0 ~u I- c: ...J 1/1 c: c: CD jjj U .5 ... i:5 c: 1: ca (jj a: ::E I- < c: "ª E E z ca u en Qi W CD CD 0 c:;: .. W ca ca Õ 1: .c !!! ~ ~ € < ~ ca CD m m c: :§ CD '~ i~ :r: <a: II CD :; 0 CD 'C .e .8 ca CD CD ca .e 5: ~ ~ c: '" '§ 'c: !!! > c: c: CD CD c: .~ 1/1 Q¡ i '" .c c: c: c: 'C ~ '5 1/1 e CD Q) '¡:: '¡:: ~ C:...J 0 ca ""') 0 0 0 0 ,~ c: ~ c: :; ~ ~ I!! ca .9 :3 ca 0 0 0 ca '" '" (jj (jj (jj :;J ::I 1/1 U. 1: .een a: Q. a: a: > Z a: ¡¡¡ < :.J a: 0 jjj U. ::E m ~ ::E a: a: u: a: (! Õ Õ õ .9 0 0 m ,j ~z 0 ""') Q. Q. Q. ...J a: ...J M 9 ,... .., ".. co ~ ~ C\I 01 <9 M 9 ,... ..,. § <9 LO <9 ~ 9 ,... ..,. § <9 <9 LO (\ en § § 0 § ò § § § ò § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § § ,... ,... co § i ,... 8 8 ~ § § § § § § N M ..¡. .b cb r.:. co en ò Cii N M ..¡. .b ~ r.:. cO en ~ @ N M ~ .b ~ ~ r.:. cO en co co co co co co co co en en 01 en en en en en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ § § M § ;1; [0 en 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 8 LO 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... ~ ~ ,... ~ ,... ~ ~ ,... ,... ,... ,... ~ ~ ~ ~ ,... ~ ,... 0 - 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 c: e LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO LO '9 LO LO LO '9 0 R 0 0 !3 Q¡ ò ò 0 ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ò 0 ò ò ò ò ò ò ò 0 ò ò ò ò ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... E O~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ c: )C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :~ ~ oca h~ M M I") M M M (') M M M M M M M (') (') M M M < < u.u '-" ""'" ~1II-tilil.I~-'¡~-I..IJ1M:I ,~- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ~=f .~eJel E ',' -~'\\:~..,.., COUNTY \~, F LOR I D A ' .,,..., COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR œ- April 23, 2004 In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that STEPHAN ROSS has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Conditional Use Permit to allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for the following described property: Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AILABLE UPON REQUEST The second public hearing on the petition will be held at 7:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on May 4, 2004, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing. County policy discourages communication with individual County Commissioners on any case outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). You may speak at a public hearing, or provide written comments for the record. The proceedings of the County Commission are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the County Commission with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462- 1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. Please call (772) 462-1580 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number CU-03-018. Sincerely, ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS \vi ,', r;.' .. // .~ J ,. .- - ~ -/q.r.-c>.:/¿'-( ('>:::_f::"/[Æ'/-(/:;ï Ü1-L #.., Paula Lewis, Chair JOHN D. ßRUHN, District NO.1' DOUG COWARD, District NO.2' PAULA A. LEWIS, District No. J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District NO.4' CLIFF ßARNES, District NO.5 County Administrotor - Douglos M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL .34982-5652 Administration: (772) 462-1590 · Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GISrrechnical Services: (772) 462-1553 Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 . Fax: (772) 462-1581 Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 · Fax: (772) 462-2132 www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us v '-tI ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): Address: Date: Signed: Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) v "'" Paula Lewis 2500 Virginia Ave. Fort Pierce, FL 34982 .-. ._-~._._~_._.- ',\ r¡=:0l i , ,", H . " , . ,¡ , '; "-' 2 G 2004, Re: BA 04001 Cutting Edge Self Storage Variance and ConditionaÍi.,, Use Permit. Dear Commissioner, As a member of the Palm Grove Homeowners Association I am writing to you in support of a Variance that is being considered on March 24, 2004 by the St. Lucie County Variance Committee. The new property owner Fun Park City Ski Homes L.C, has offered to donate a 13.00 foot strip of land to the FDOT for a roadway easement on the north one-half of lot 259 in White City. This strip of land will allow the FDOT to ultimately put in a deceleration lane on Federal Highway 1. This will allow much easier access into and out of Sunshine Boulevard and the Palm Grove subdivision. I need this deceleration lane to safely get into and out of the Palm Grove subdivision and onto US 1. I also would like to voice my support for the Conditional Use Application that is to be considered by the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission March 25, 2004. The applicant is proposing to develop a Self Storage facility on the 4.2 acres just to the south of Sunshine Blvd. The property, Cutting Edge Self Storage of Fort Pierce, will be a clean, secure, quiet, and well managed neighbor. I am in support of this project and I am hopeful that you and the committee will also be in favor of it. Sincerely, r .' MAR 2 9 2004 Association C-t: fJo ~/ ~, f!()¿vrfc/ Adt11i n; sfy¿Jör As1f; ff))4.~ /tith~f'tíd øÞr Ð{(v: d Kelly ~'lf\ f s ,AAutf ~ ~tt+'i Afurn{ v ....., Paula Lewis 2500 Virginia Ave. Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: BA 04001 Cutting Edge Self Storage Variance and Conditional Use Permit. Dear Commissioner, As a member of the Palm Grove Homeowners Association I am writing to you in support of a Variance that is being considered on March 24, 2004 by the St. Lucie County Variance Committee. The new property owner Fun Park City Ski Homes L.C, has offered to donate a 13.00 foot strip of land to the FDOT for a roadway easement on the north one-half of lot 259 in White City. This strip of land will allow the FDOT to ultimately put in a deceleration lane on Federal Highway 1. This will allow much easier access into and out of Sunshine Boulevard and the Palm Grove subdivision. I need this deceleration lane to safely get into and out of the Palm Grove subdivision and onto US 1. I also would like to voice my support for the Conditional Use Application that is to be considered by the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission March 25, 2004. The applicant is proposing to develop a Self Storage facility on the 4.2 acres just to the south of Sunshine Blvd. The property, Cutting Edge Self Storage of Fort Pierce, will be a clean, secure, quiet, and well managed neighbor. I am in support of this project and I am hopeful that you and the committee will also be in favor of it. Sincerely, '~CL Palm Grove '-" 'wi Paula Lewis 2500 Virginia Ave. Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: BA 04001 Cutting Edge Self Storage Variance and Conditional Use Permit. Dear Commissioner, As a member of the Palm Grove Homeowners Association I am writing to you in support of a Variance that is being considered on March 24, 2004 by the St. Lucie County Variance Committee. The new property owner Fun Park City Ski Homes L.C, has offered to donate a 13.00 foot strip of land to the FDOT for a roadway easement on the north one-half of lot 259 in White City. This strip of land will allow the FDOT to ultimately put in a deceleration lane on Federal Highway 1. This will allow much easier access into and out of Sunshine Boulevard and the Palm Grove subdivision. I need this deceleration lane to safely get into and out of the Palm Grove subdivision and onto US 1. I also would like to voice my support for the Conditional Use Application that is to be considered by the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission March 25, 2004. The applicant is proposing to develop a Self Storage facility on the 4.2 acres just to the south of Sunshine Blvd. The property, Cutting Edge Self Storage of Fort Pierce, will be a clean, secure, quiet, and well managed neighbor. I am in support of this project and I am hopeful that you and the committee will also be in favor of it. ;;cerelY, "" / , !,-/,/Ltð~,(}p/. <~~U; j ., Palm Grove Association v ""'. Paula Lewis 2500 Virginia Ave. Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: BA 04001 Cutting Edge Self Storage Variance and Conditional Use Permit. Dear Commissioner, As a member of the Palm Grove Homeowners Association I am writing to you in support of a Variance that is being considered on March 24, 2004 by the St. Lucie County Variance Committee. The new property owner Fun Park City Ski Homes L.C, has offered to donate a 13.00 foot strip of land to the FDOT for a roadway easement on the north one-half of lot 259 in White City. This strip of land will allow the FDOT to ultimately put in a deceleration lane on Federal Highway 1. This will allow much easier access into and out of Sunshine Boulevard and the Palm Grove subdivision. I need this deceleration lane to safely get into and out of the Palm Grove subdivision and onto US 1. I also would like to voice my support for the Conditional Use Application that is to be considered by the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission March 25, 2004. The applicant is proposing to develop a Self Storage facility on the 4.2 acres just to the south of Sunshine Blvd. The property, Cutting Edge Self Storage of Fort Pierce, will be a clean, secure, quiet, and well managed neighbor. I am in support of this project and I am hopeful that you and the committee will also be in favor of it. Sincerely, lli~~~ Palm Grove Association """ ....",,¡ Paula Lewis 2500 Virginia Ave. Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: BA 04001 Cutting Edge Self Storage Variance and Conditional Use Permit. Dear Commissioner, As a member of the Palm Grove Homeowners Association I am writing to you in Support of a Variance that is being considered on March 24, 2004 by the St. Lucie County Variance Committee. The new property owner Fun Park City Ski Homes L.C, has offered to donate a 13.00 foot strip of land to the FOOT for a roadway easement on the north one-half of lot 259 in White City. This strip of land will allow the FDOT to ultimately put in a deceleration lane on Federal Highway 1. This will allow much easier access into and out of Sunshine Boulevard and the Palm Grove subdivision. I need this deceleration lane to safely get into and out of the Palm Grove subdivision and onto US 1. I also would like to voice my support for the Conditional Use Application that is to be considered by the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission March 25, 2004. The applicant is proposing to develop a Self Storage facility on the 4.2 acres just to the south of Sunshine Blvd. The property, Cutting Edge Self Storage of Fort Pierce, will be a clean, secure, quiet, and well managed neighbor. I am in support of this project and I am hopeful that you and the committee will also be in favor of it. (jJ;~~ Palm Grove Association '-" ....." Paula Lewis 2500 Virginia Ave. Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: BA 04001 Cutting Edge Self Storage Variance and Conditional Use Permit. Dear Commissioner, As a member of the Palm Grove Homeowners Association I am writing to you in support of a Variance that is being considered on March 24, 2004 by the St. Lucie County Variance Committee. The new property owner Fun Park City Ski Homes L.C, has offered to donate a 13.00 foot strip of land to the FDOT for a roadway easement on the north one-half of lot 259 in White City. This strip of land will allow the FDOT to ultimately put in a deceleration lane on Federal Highway 1. This will allow much easier access into and out of Sunshine Boulevard and the Palm Grove subdivision. I need this deceleration lane to safely get into and out of the Palm Grove subdivision and onto US 1. I also would like to voice my support for the Conditional Use Application that is to be considered by the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission March 25, 2004. The applicant is proposing to develop a Self Storage facility on the 4.2 acres just to the south of Sunshine Blvd. The property, Cutting Edge Self Storage of Fort Pierce, will be a clean, secure, quiet, and well managed neighbor. I am in support of this project and I am hopeful that you and the committee will also be in favor of it. Sincerely, (l4 i"- .¡ il< 711 a.0v /:x/;.Æ' d<t-<--¡ / I Palm Grove Association .. "". "'-II Paula Lewis 2500 Virginia Ave. Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: BA 04001 Cutting Edge Self Storage Variance and Conditional Use Permit. Dear Commissioner, As a member of the Palm Grove Homeowners Association I am writing to you in support of a Variance that is being considered on March 24, 2004 by the St. Lucie County Variance Committee. The new property owner Fun Park City Ski Homes L.C, has offered to donate a 13.00 foot strip of land to the FOOT for a roadway easement on the north one-half of lot 259 in White City. This strip of land will allow the FOOT to ultimately put in a deceleration lane on Federal Highway 1. This will allow much easier access into and out of Sunshine Boulevard and the Palm Grove subdivision. I need this deceleration lane to safely get into and out of the Palm Grove subdivision and onto US 1. I also would like to voice my support for the Conditional Use Application that is to be considered by the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission March 25, 2004. The applicant is proposing to develop a Self Storage facility on the 4.2 acres just to the south of Sunshine Blvd. The property, Cutting Edge Self Storage of Fort Pierce, will be a clean, secure, quiet, and well managed neighbor. I am in support of this project and I am hopeful that you and the committee will also be in favor of it. ~y, 1I A I!t 1 'l..- U42"", Palm Grove Association . , ~ t~t rt~ \~. r {' ltv ~ ~ ~ ~ (~:I 01..' IJ:I I:t' '0,;. ~... Iii I.J:! I.fl 1.1:1 - - _0 _0 _,0 - - - - - - - - - - - - ....., "U1-:-; t~ ã; ~ ~ """" "'CJ -: -. --i - (\)........... -. ~ L..· 0<-. .r->æo ." ~ ;.~ r:1) .~ .<:;> w.." '') .þ. ,,:' ,'- (0,< ". ro "- I\.) ~ , ~ ¡.: f; . t ~ ~ . , ;~ \ '-' \\~ J w/O ~/~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA May 4, 2004 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Sec- tion 11,00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Devel- opment Code and in accordance with the provi- sions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. Lucie County Board of Commissioners consider their following requests: STEPHAN ROSS, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouses (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) in the CG (Commercial, General) Zon- ing District for the following described property: WHITE CITY SID 10 3640 N 1/2 OF LOT 259 - LESS CANAL RMI (4.24 AC.) Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boule- vard. (Entrance to The Grove residential commu- nity) GLASSMAN PROPERTIES, LLC., for a Change in Zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Develop- ment - Johnston Lakes) Zoning District for the fol- lowing described property: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE NORTHEAST OF SECTION 16, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST; THENCE SOUTH 89 DEGREES 54 MINUTES, 25 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 75.00 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DEGREES, 31 MINUTES, 44 SECONDS EAST A DISTANCE OF 124.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BE- GINNING; THENCE CONTINUE NORTH 00 DE- GREES, 31 MINUTES, 44 SECONDS EAST A DIS- TANCE OF 1113.97 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 89 DE- GREES, 54 MINUTES, 25 SECONDS EAST A DIS- TANCE OF 1295.54 FEET; THENCE NORTH 00 DE- GREES, 31 MINUTES, 44 SECONDS EAST A DIS- TANCE OF 1113.97 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 DE- GREES, 54 MINUTES, 25 SECONDS WEST, A DIS- TANCE OF 1295.54 FEET TO THE POINT OF BE- GINNING. Location: Northwest corner of the intersection of Johnston Road and Indrio Road. PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the Commission Chambers, Roger Poitras Annex, 3rd Floor, 51. Lu- cie County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on May 4, 2004, be- ginning at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as pos- sible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commission with respect to any' matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA 151 Paula Lewis, CHAIR PUBLISH DATE: April 24, 2004 593611 "'" ~ '-II ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and SunshIne Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three followIng statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE x I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): ~, h '¡i' I 'j h CJ r¡¡,a ~. ¿(¡tv b n I J ,)i!!{ ¡Jóf1dðh?ç¿¡ {)v,:ue Date: '0 p'l Signed: hI-I f7¡é¡,rce n: 3¥9 S"¿' 1Aj~a( d~{;~ ,~~~' Address: Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. PIerce) - - '-" ''wi ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. HIghway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove resIdential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE 'le ~ I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed CondItional Use. Name (Please Print): 'Ðnf)C<! d A.I. f' (Ýa. rb'0 > t. n1ar+, i1 4ð( {:;u Y-ú/Jrdn M/J'¿'. H, fJ/erce FL. ':?tfýý;) ---l93~ V I 1 ) 1.1 Address: ~. ... ~4'~V:-- ¿Ú<:~~. i: "~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Date: lfjJ10'l Signed: Comments: , () FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) ~..... ~- '-'" ...., ST. lUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (SOD) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/S) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and SunshIne Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three followIng statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE ~ I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): 13 -P. 0/ It / /1/} 19- rV N' +-,:F J4-e-ic ->'l)':L -, ~ W 11' /VI -c.. - ~ /" ~ L~ c 1; Date: r/~rd) y Signed: LI 1)1 L-tL, r r, ~ "~Y"'C..--e.....) FL. 3 "~2 - ). 9' 7 'Z.- Address: Please note that any form returned without a name and ad ss will not be considered. forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: '/ q FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) '-'" '-..1 ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (CommercIal, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE ¡le5 I I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): /-1/1 h fie í ¡VI S ~2.. ?ðudi',I»(} $- é} 0;, /- n, ..- d/íe('Ce r~ 3'-Jtf~¿ Address: Date: ty Á Q .-:) 1"-( Signed: I#tc ( /Ie.tt-it4 Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (CuttIng Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) '-" "'" ST. lUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE \ '~S· " , ~r , ,,, "- I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): 4 tltJLt ~K. 'tii PF-~ - ~ C~ /, -....." r-"'~, 0·.....".".-.. - ."... ,_~( Q",:7 1-> /VI 1"}1) c:. R./- l f:: L.. b __ I /'-----\ ~r···'···:--·_/ é ~,~I'f~ '/ tf¡ß> Address: Date: '/02() ~. tf I I / Signed: Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) ~ 'wi ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Comm issioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove resIdential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OFTHE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE )( I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): \..\w~\\ ~. \~~\11 ~l)9)~~ \~þ ">5 Co., e'f" Cw ;bsc~) ftr"f ~~'L" j'L $~'ì~À Address: Date: ~c~b'6LL Signed: ~G.~î:t(~~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) '-' "'" ST. lUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and SunshIne Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE .'Á I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): \\C\~~@~n ~~,à\ ~\~ ~t\~k~f~~. ~~',"~k~~~\ ~"\9')?;J... Address: Date: h\.-;~-O~ Signed: }J¡wtr7t{ fdi Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) '-' "wfI ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (SOD) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE ;µA-/ 1 I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): Db F\ i+ 1'1 '~ ¿) V J rJ [: l-"-R - i'7 !? I: . (J II ' ¿; ,N,/' t?...-> I;:;). c) > Ir ) "t ?/~{. ß:UúJ ~ dV-:t~h- Address: Date: Lf·- ,<_:7 -- 6 f- Signed: /Ii) < .;(tL4-L.. ~/, ~~~~fÞ (}¡J~ t/ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) '-" "wi ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE M.V3.2~ Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): ~JIfi¡¡ :~ Mr, & Mrs, Ralph J Bizzarro ),,!~..TJ' 5856 Summerfield Court ~. Fort Pierce FL 34982-3973 Address: Date: t£'f-ht Signed ¿~L/~~~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: iAPf¡, 2 s FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (CuttIng Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) '-', .....,1 ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE v I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): Betty Hartung 5844 Summerfield Ct. Fort Pierce. FL 34982 Address: Date: øµ.-¡; t/ Signed: (fiiu¡ >:&+:Z;; Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: '..',' '7 ç FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) ~ ""'" ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. ) '¡/.i, ())¿íhl.- I~~ . I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): ~~eS~B f- ~~# ~¡htA .5 ' 0 $,-~ (J [) u;J- 0 r f?E. d!.,¡ "1 ~ 2 If? 8:J- Address: Date: Ii} n/ 011- Signed: '---j~ q. r~, . Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: 27 FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) ~. '..I ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: S1. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, F1. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE 'fe4./ I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): J)r:J tJ A-l D J. \AJ).j I' rF £2. /9 ME X {fNb R ('n ~(' fG (!J.. E 1'1.-""" ()~. f) h, 0 ~, -r.e. g ¢ tt ?z- ;;;::/sign~: ~~ Address: Date: Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: ? 7 ' FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) '- "-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three followIng statements and return by: M.~3.2.~ I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): R08EAT J & DIANE TODERO 5842 MOSS CT. F" PI~, Fl S4__ Address: Date: (tþ.1 ~r ').(11' ~ Signed: ' '~~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: ?7 FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. PIerce) \w 'wi ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: S1. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, F1. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004./ v.) ar-AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): Sì'ø,JL..£ t t- S 7 q ~-- b R... bA.. WI m 1}12~ I./l-E r ~ I S I\I/~ wÇ¡¿J (' Ð C i-l:r, tcoJl.ì' A £'JU!.~/ fCL 34.-Q <::[.2. - 3 fS=> Address: Date: J};.4) ot- Signed: .~U~ thtU1~ W~~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: :j 7 FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (CuttIng Edge Self Storage of Ft. PIerce) ~ ~ ST. lUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OFTHE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE / I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed CondItional Use. Name (Please Print): A~+hðf\J ~ \.AV~ Co 00 i ALt:.'-t-A~DR' Pr C I'R ·~t. PE~eE. FL 3Lf9f[;l. . r~ Address: Date: ~ Signed: Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) \..t ..." ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: S1. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, F1. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE v' I certify that, as of the date shown below, lam a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): v: ð ¡If g c-,#V ,5~ / ?ð µ/ t vc£' 1J~í: , { ,k;-d- )~/'¡:-ýC~ Address: Date: 7/ý~Y / ' I Signed: cJ:h,- _¿,£r.~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) \w 'wi ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004./ I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): J ^ O<~ H3L ~3'2- Address: Date: i}ÝGlf Signed: Please note that any form returned without a name and add ss will not be consi ered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: 7 ì FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. PIerce) \.wt ..." ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (SOD) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Com missioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No. 1 and SunshIne Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE !/ I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed CondItional Use. Name (Please Print): ~"(¿o~ San..otl 5flf3 :5tJ~'Y1((}_Œ_Ff e Ld CT \=0 ftT (~l £: (è C-E ) FL < 34- q 8:2- , Úf'¡e; L .it. 2tt,.8igned: JO.,µ~ ~1-~) )- T ./ Address: Date: Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: 7 FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) \..., 'wtI ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the Intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG {Commercial, General} Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE /" I ~/ V' I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed CondItIonal Use. Name (Please Print): 1< I L I-I f.1 Æ ð ~) fZy /7 /./ .fIr r D ,'v :t.\ ~ /2 :.:J /61 ,:)?Z Fi /,,/IF.,~<..~~ Fe.. 5 L/ 'f..f-........ Add ress: ,~/' ,"- (.,.l.:./~/ , . I Signed: /c-J~-J ~1J7~ Date: Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: ry FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (CuttIng Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) - -- \wI ""'" ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (SOO) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/S) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and SunshIne Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE )« I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed ConditIonal Use. Name (Please Print): ¡; /?E;:::T -r; f3,£ ¿,Ie) 6"7L/2- ,A-LSXI4A/ t),.t!/4 (¡z) C/X , 3¥9B 2- Address: Date: ~/~:I Signed: Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: ,-¡ '-'-,'I '¡ FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. PIerce) \..,< ...., ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I/"~ I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): I If F If [ f'l A/ /J J- £ T í £ IJ ./ ~~:-.P ¡ 'I ~ f,J /1 t1 (, f' f IF J- (1./ / Address: Date: lifO/A)." ~;/ Signed: n ~ ,If'(/. /~/' L/' If I 1{ /b~,!?71/ " Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) \..,t ....,J ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE ./ I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): Rò betel ).... !1rvo e5JJI¿ k,> 11. /-Î~â'1""~C hùs .fe.oL 51(1] J9/~xa./JclKI¿ e~(k ;:/ ~e~C't". F¿., 3~9ð;? Address: Date: L/_ ;}5-- 0 'i' Signed: AUd ~~Øb ~~J'ð 0. O~/J~ð. ~~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: P/~a:5(~ )eao" 0-5 /?'1a /? 1/ .)¡eees D 6' " 00'5'51' 1. / 27. FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) \... """ ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (SOO) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/S) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE / I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): ~M ~\.,.¿J~ \ ~O,()ft II. fAíAt5/!try ~gd.:. ~ "",,,,,,",c.Qe-lJ c.-\, "Ç--L, ~~",~.:t=\..- :> ~ e '¿" - /} / Address: Date: f-f": ( ;;¿ í kx>-f Signed: /71 ¡ , l All returned / ~. Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request.. Comments: itnR 2 7" ,1 FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) \..,.. "w!fJÎ ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OFTHE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OFTHE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE - (j&1 , (j I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): /,S' H / R l 1:- Ý /~ .' I 6g-ð-ð 0 ~ Elf fn H/~RIJ£(~ (,1. /:"1; PI ë'/Ct, G { If. Address: Date: -!L-¿?-ð'L Signed: ,4J4..¡:: ~J4 Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: :!'irry" ? 7 FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) '-' ....., ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: APR 2 8 2004 To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE x I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): {-: ¿,t--¡f- ./? --¿.3 {ç IYJ .~ .R -" -/ /--;-/ / A / Ó· F-.... / CJ -K-, L- L,. t-- / (- , / I~i'--- // Ej(U::: ¡:Z3 cfC;Ý2, , Address: If) cJ55' C (~- - Date: tfþ(rkc/ Signed: f " ' , . --"Q..~~_ 'v..-^,--, ~~,-'-~-ð-"J,J1,jLe",,- Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: "'Iff-- ( 5i / 5 ~ /I- /t' U ~=::-. Ny II-IE rÝ- ¡¿ ~r u ~/U EÌ) / /-':0&1 FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) \..- 'wi ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: To allow household goods warehousing and storaøé¡frr1~irrare?ouse. , Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community), CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three followIng statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE i// I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed ConditIonal Use. Name (Please Print): ~/leGIA.lII'f Sc~Ej//K. cI- /'1 A- "v~ IN C'. Sc. #I=.H k 372 ß 1l1IJ,4 VA ...(/1/ / t=,,, p/eÆ:CEJ F~ . Address: 1./- 2?--OY Signed: ; /J ..,; - . - ..5' ~ {/,~~ '~ r- c.. '¿'L----A.. Date: Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) . APR-25-2004 07:3~ AM BOB.ALCANTARO '-' 1 561 336 94'29 P.01 -._- "'" £T. LUCIE COUNlX CONDI~AL USE RESPO~Ii..FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the 51. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that Where a written protelt again.t an applicatIOn for a Conditional Use Permit il signed by the owners of fifty (SO) percent or mOte of the are. within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proPOled action, any such CondJtlonal Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners, The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use; Regarding Propsrty Locsted At: To allow hous"hold goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: South e... corner 0' the In....Hetion 0' South U.S. Highway NO.1 8nd Sunlhlne Boulevlrd. (Entrence to The Grove ....Identlal community) CG (Commercial. Gen8nlI) Pls.s. Return To: 51. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Pl.... check only one of the th.... 'Ollowlng at8tement. Ind return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAYQR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE . HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE ./ I certify th8t, .. of the d8te .hown below, , am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Pl.... Print). Robeel ,1.. ~NIJ ~ï)/Lt~ /I. I1~D"'.ko /;M~ !'c. 5~O 7 191'1!!¥ß/~~/~ e.ec k J ¡:::-¡ ~ rICe''" /=",. 3<¡9/~ ¡¡u.~ ~~ J.L~~ t2. Ø~~ðJ ~ Signed: Address: Date: ./../- .:J6-· 0 cy Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are II matter of public record and available for viewing uþon request. Comments: ¡J /IV :s,- /NÞÔL" o'S #1onl/ /....4!"e~ CJ \S J)(;)'5'5~i4. ';1' , FILE NO. CU·03-011- Stephan Ro.. (Cutting I!dge S.1f Sto,.. of F1. Pierce) \..." 'wi ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (SOD) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/S) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three fOllowIng statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE ~ I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): Gt:'-d('ge S, ßi-f.cr0(~n srJlJ/ A Ie. J. Cln d r I CU (! I r. Fr, ¡7¡'erce , F¡, 3f9!.L / Address: Date: 1- 027 ~ t) 1- Signed: -57 A-f~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: 28 FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. PIerce) '-' '....", ST. lUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: S1. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, F1. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE Mav 3.2004. X I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): ~~~J:6~C-~ M. f (0.'7 (0''' g c:, \ 'M,{.£<.AìQ l.- ý\ , F+- ~ i ¿ rc e. ) Address: Date: H-J ~ b I 0 tf J I Signed: Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: ..... -. FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) '-' """'" ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE / (1" V I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): 1J/(;1(f\ AS ¡:: HI,) '- ilL S íZ- 5 i 1 7~ It ò¿/)( 51-1 7) J? ) LY/v))A (~/!l'(-/lL ) 'I: l)ll-j2(E~ r=¡'j i/18':J· Address: Date: ii/It '1 / ¿)ll , " Signed: lk_:L d1, :(2), Yj/40¿, (~ il,~~'{{ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) '-' ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and SunshIne Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE / I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): JJ) N~Y Æ, k A ""DR rB':j3 H()NF)~ß E'~I- ~--r Address: Date: 4 '- ~ ¿'_:J-,ooLfigned: --r4{l-. ~~) Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: if',,",- FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) '- ....., ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Comm issioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE )( I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): l~-6tv ~Pek\) ù .5q~q ~.. \..1<; B--l E?tP\~((<u 0-- I Address: Date: ~'~{)~ Signed: c¡.,1~ (j ;f.ek:. Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: s: FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (CuttIng Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) '-' ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (CommercIal, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three followIng statements and return by: May 3.2004/ I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed ConditIonal Use. Name (Please Print): ..3JLu) J ÞA/-. ACJIo/t:f' ¥~o fJc H.D ~ I..ð 51} -Ø £ I Ý ¿; Address: Date: fI/~~ ( rJ0t,1 Y Signed: F9~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) '-' ....., ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (SOD) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE )( I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): I ....hj \ì' ~ t ~ G G- G-E T=J -s:? ¿ '9 \--\ ú y, ~ 'i ~ -e,;> 1 Address: V{- I " Date: ~ Signed: ~"',(, \1, ~~ C'K 111~ pJ t ,] Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: ') 8 FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (CuttIng Edge Self Storage of Ft. PIerce) '-' "-" ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE / 1./ I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed ConditIonal Use. Name (Please Print): Î (,,~ (\ 1'"\I'(}0. , J,. . . " . II·' 1-.. ' , -' - -, '" , (j ,-/~","J /, / (t,;_.~/ ')if\., ( " ' L... Æ"" ('of' ;::.. ¡....--r Z / '1 c >'> / . r /.' ¡ t I'~ ~-:'.-' - "'- ~ -.--. 'v L ::J {. .';)j l::¡' , Address: Date: 'f If 7l; 'I Signed: [ I Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: 8 FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) \..r "wtII ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE Y£.5' / I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): --:·(íÍO /vt jJ.( ~ t~lJ ¡¿ c; £S .1~~ -o/9A//J/V4 '¡~/VE ,;C r:-¡:{ /4e/' Address: Date: ø ~/C,¡ Signed: ~~~. Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: "'~ FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) '-' ..." ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and SunshIne Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Currently Zoned: Please Return To: 5t. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE 'l I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): Add ress: Date: .:k Ill'll ,f, -¡- A L~}AfY IY), 5, hI/1'l C)í( 'J 5~:376tLM;11Ç~Æt-ÆJ c--r: ~r¡tJ/~A¡1~ .349$2..- / a.~~~.J~ '17 . ,g~~ ~/30/0il- Signed: k R ~--.o {/ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: ;'::! i.,.-, A.~pR.~\IAL. \<s ~ASE.(D D0 t)f.\JELö~ER.. ~f2()L.JtOJtJG L3 ~T öf=" l..\\~ Ç)l?a~E.Q.ll( pöR A OL:.-~C('ELt:.~Al'lð~ L~10f ID (\\Ez=. ï x: L~(I)A STATE; QE:Q\.}~P..~~~1é.1']TS) l.0KEk)<:'\JE.'A., U. S. :# t lS W IOE:t\J~. E/\l.ï,-:t(\\'K.Ç:, \~rD ~\,ré , FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) '-' ...", ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE / I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed ConditIonal Use. Name (Please Print): ----./ I / l ,...,.- ¿-- tv & ðð t¿·, ~ -5 I ~/I 2 /~ {¡ r ó Ie::> /!' ¡¡ 11 j" jJ. ~T'O - ~ . II {'!'Pd [ // Address: Date: <j /z 1 ~ <I Signed If! / d~~-r Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: Q FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) '-" ~ ST. lUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE v I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): m iz·',f rf!11. i .' 1')" . -i:.rv RJv' £<¿'Jj.!;~ u_J .."., ~)±:¡.4- '3i/1<J~ Address: Date: 1-:- ;{6- ð t Signed: i:JJz ._~{_ ,/1) ~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: ~. ,~ FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) \..f ..., ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM APR 2 6 Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and SunshIne Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE -ff'\}'A I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): " Address: Date: <7 '/ /rj/A Signed: ~iØ¿/4L ¡ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (CuttIng Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) \...c '-II1II ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three followIng statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE / / I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): r/orcn,..-C/ A. Unqer . Lj-Oê) EtA r-on=Oln L0.J' e1amC0rvV?F+.iiera?.! FJ . r 34-qg2- Address: Date: Cf-v' oPt d;signed: "7 C7/fl/ÂÆ.(/Û,t¡vv Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. PIerce) ,-,. 'r1I ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse. Currently Zoned: Southeast corner of the intersection of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Sunshine Boulevard. (Entrance to The Grove residential community) CG (Commercial, General) Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Dawn G. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three followIng statements and return by: Mav 3.2004. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE , ~...,............- /" I certify that, as of the date shown below, lam a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed CondItional Use. Name (Please Print): Ed'-'l,QR¿ ~GfI~YðN ;J6/ 'Y~\)~~l~ L;¡Vlé-~ ¡:¡:f:e~~(4.)fZ <·:~J-1C(~·2... Address: Date: ~hbÞL Signed: ~ , ~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: 7 FILE NO. CU-03-018 - Stephan Ross (Cutting Edge Self Storage of Ft. Pierce) ,""Ii / .. "/' ....,¡ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. It DATE: May 4, 2004 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Robert O. Freeman, Esq. Bond Counsel SUBJECT: Resolution No. 04-144 - St. Lucie Improvement Revenue Bonds (Land Acquisition) BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS A V AILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA TION: Staff Recommends that the Board approve Resolution No. 04-144 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: ['X3 APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 D las Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: Jv Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Public Works Dir: County Eng,: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eft, 5/96 t '-'" S SQUIRE VWDERS LEGAL COUNSEL WORLDWIDE .."", SQUIRE, SANDERS & DEMPSEYL.L.P. MEMORANDUM To: Chairman and Members of the Board of County Commissioners of 81. Lucie County, Florida From: Robert O. Freeman Date: April 28, 2004 Re: Proposed Resolution to Authorize Bonds for Permanent Financing of Land Acquisition for new Research and Educational Center The attached Resolution 04-144 would authorize not exceeding $12,000,000 Improvement Revenue Bonds (Land Acquisition) to be issued in late 2004 or early 2005. The Bonds would be issued for the purpose of refinancing the $10,000,000 loan from Sun Trust Bank, used to finance the acquisition of land for the new research and educational center within the County. One of the conditions for the $10,000,000 loan is to have permanent financing in place by the maturity of the Note, on February 1, 2005. The authorization of the Bonds would be the first step in issuing the take-out financing. A supplemental resolution, with the terms and conditions of the Bonds will have to be adopted prior to the issuance of the Bonds. The Bonds would be secured by a covenant to budget and appropriate each year the Bonds are outstanding from legally available non-ad valorem revenues of the County, in a sufficient amount to pay the principal of and interest on the Bonds as it becomes due. ¡AX l0713.1/28902-00121/M-BOARD í , '-' ~ RESOLUTION NO. 04-144 A RESOLUTION AUTHORlZING THE ISSUANCE OF NOT EXCEEDING $12,000,000 IMPROVEMENT REVENUE BONDS (LAND ACQUISITION), OF THE COUNTY TO FINANCE THE COST OF REFUNDING THE COUNTY'S IMPROVEMENT REVENUE NOTE, SERIES 2004 (LAND ACQUISITION); PROVIDING FOR THE PAYMENT OF THE BONDS FROM CERTAIN PLEDGED REVENUES; MAKING CERTAIN COVENANTS AND AGREEMENTS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORlDA: . Section 1. Authority for this Resolution; Definitions. This Resolution is adopted pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 125, Florida Statutes, County Ordinance No. 87-77, as amended, and other applicable provisions oflaw (collectively, the "Act"). Section 2. Findings. It is hereby ascertained, detennined and declared that: (A) The County, pursuant to Resolution No. 04-134, authorized and plans to issue its Improvement Revenue Note, Series 2004 (Land Acquisition) (the "Note"). (B) It is necessary and desirable and in the best interest of the County to refund the Note on or prior to February 1, 2005 through the issuance of Improvement Revenue Bonds (Land Acquisition) (the "Bonds"). (C) It is necessary and in the best interests of the health, safety and welfare of the County and its inhabitants that the County authorize the refunding of the Note through the issuance of the Bonds (the "Refunding"). The County is authorized pursuantto the provisions of the Act to refund the Note. (D) The County is authorized pursuant to the provIsIOns of the Act to issue Improvement Revenue Bonds (Land Acquisition) (the "Bonds") to pay the costs of the Refunding. (E) It is necessary and desirable and in the best interests of the County that in each year while the Bonds are outstanding it covenant (the "Covenant") to budget and appropriate from legally available Non-Ad Valorem Revenues and deposit to a debt service fund sufficient amounts (the "Pledged Revenues") to pay the annual principal of and interest on the Bonds when due. (F) The principal of and interest on the Bonds shall be secured solely by the Pledged Revenues. Neither the County, nor the State of Florida or any political subdivision thereof or governmental authority or body therein, shall ever be required to levy ad valorem taxes to pay the 1 10712.1128902-00121IR-INITIAL ,- , "-" ...,,¡ principal of and interest on the Bonds, and the Bonds shall not be secured by a lien upon any property owned by or situated within the County other than the Pledged Revenues in the manner provided herein and in the Supplemental Resolution (hereinafter defined). (G) In order to enable the underwriters for the Bonds to comply with Rule 15c2-12 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Rule"), in connection with the offering and sale of the Bonds, it is necessary that the County's Preliminary Official Statement with respect to the Bonds be "deemed final" (except for pennitted omissions) by a representative of the County. Section 3. Authorization of Bonds. The issuance by the County of not exceeding - $12,000,000 Improvement Revenue Bonds (Land Acquisition), for the purpose of paying Refunding Costs is hereby authorized. The Bonds shall be dated, shall be in the denomination of $5,000 or integral multiples thereof, shall be in fully-registered fonn, payable to "Cede & Co.", as nominee for the Depository Trust Company, New York, New York, shall be issued in book-entry only fonn, shall mature at such time and shall bear interest from their date until maturity, calculated on a 360-day year basis, payable at such times and at a rate or rates not to exceed the maximum rate allowed by law, and may be redeemable prior to maturity, all as provided in a supplemental resolution of the Board (the "Supplemental Resolution") adopted at or prior to the date of sale of the Bonds. Section 4. Delegation of Authority to Deem Preliminary Official Statement Final, To Deliver Preliminary Official Statement, and to Take Other Action. The County Administrator, in consultation with and upon the advice of the County's Financial Advisor, Bond Counsel and County Attorney is authorized to proceed to draft and develop, or cause to be drafted and developed, all documents necessary to facilitate and proceed with the offering for sale of the Bonds, including a Preliminary Official Statement. The Preliminary Official Statement shall not be distributed on behalf of the County to the Underwriter unless and until such Preliminary Official Statement has been "deemed final" (except for pennitted omissions) in accordance with the Rule. The County Administrator, upon the advice of the County's Financial Advisor, Bond Counsel and County Attorney, is hereby authorized to certify or otherwise represent when such Preliminary Official Statement shall be "deemed final" by the County as of its date (except for pennitted omissions), in accordance with the Rule. The County Administrator and the Finance Director, upon the advice of the County's Financial Advisor, Bond Counsel and the County Attorney, are authorized and directed (1) to deliver the "deemed final" Preliminary Official Statement to the Underwriter for use in marketing the Bonds; (2) to apply for and secure a commitment for the issuance of a municipal bond insurance policy and/or a debt service reserve fund surety bond with respect to the Bonds; and (3) to take such further action as may be necessary or desirable to allow the Underwriter to present a proposal to purchase the Bonds to the County at the earliest possible date consistent with favorable market conditions. Section 5. Continuing Disclosure Agreement. The Chainnan and Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners will execute and deliver to the Underwriter a continuing disclosure agreement satisfying the requirements of the Rule at or prior to the time of sale of the Bonds. 2 10712. J /28902,OOI21/R-IN!TlAL ~ .."",¡ Section 6. Repeal of Inconsistent Instruments, All resolutions of the County or parts thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed to the extent of such conflict. Section 7. Effective Date. This resolution shall take effect immediately upon its adoption. Passed and Adopted at a meeting duly called and held this 4th day of May, 2004. (SEAL) ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Chairman, Board of County Commissioners ATTEST: Clerk of the Circuit Court ex officio Clerk of the Board of County Commissioners APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney 3 10712.1!28902-00121!R-INITIAL ., /' y ~ '-' ...., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 7 DATE: May 4,2004 REVISED REGULAR [XX] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre SUBJECT: Release of Perpetual Conservation Easement - Midway Industrial Park _ Phase II BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Release of Perpetual Conservation Easement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Release. COMMISSION ACTION: CE: D 9 as Anderson County Administrator [ ] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [~ OTHER: Item pulled to fe-agenda fOf one week County Attorney: ~. Review and Approvals Growth Mgmt, Dir,: Public Works Dir: 1. }~. í Finance: (Check for copy only, if applicable) Eo>. R,,,,,,, Mg'.' ~}oI.R_ County Surveyor: Originating Dept, Eft, 5/96 "'" 'WI INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO.: 04-647 DATE: April 28, 2004 SUBJECT: Release of Perpetual Conservation Easement - Midway Industrial Park - Phase II ************************************************************************** BACKGROUND: When the Midway Industrial Park was platted in 2000, the developer granted the County a perpetual conservation easement over two wetlands located within the Industrial Park. On March 12, 2004, the County Attorney received a letter from Johnathan Ferguson, Esquire, an attorney representing John Mayo who owns two lots in the Industrial Park. A copy of Mr. Ferguson's March 12 letter with enclosures is attached. As indicated in Mr. Ferguson's letter, Mr. Mayo's lots are affected by one of the wetlands which makes it difficult to develop the lots. Because of this, Mr. Mayo is requesting that the County consider releasing the wetland located on his property from the Perpetual Conservation Easement in return for his agreement to purchase 2.1 credits from the Bluefield Mitigation Bank. Mr. Mayo's request was referred to the Environmental Resources Division for review. On April 23, 2004, Environmental Regulations Supervisor Amy Mott wrote a memorandum, a copy of which is attached, supporting Mr. Mayo's request. ~ '...., RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Release of Perpetual Conservation Easement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Release. R~fUII sub it Daniel S. McIntYI\: County A ttorne) DSM/ caf Anr-27-2004 01:16P~FrDm-RUDEN Me KY PSL 7728735959 ~696 P,002/002 F-782 ~I Ruden ~I McClosky 145 NW CENTfW. PARK PLAZA SUrTE200 PORTSr. lUCE, FlORIDA 34eee (772) 873-5900 FAX: (877) 861-89114 JOHNATHAN.ÆRGUSON@RUŒN.COM Apri127,2004 Via Facsimile Daniel McIntyre, County Anomey St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: Release of Perpetual Conservation Easement - Mr. Mayo Dear Dan: This is a follow up to the conversation we had at the Board meeting and to our mid March request that I sent you regarding the removal of a perpetual conservation easement removed from a piece of industrial property located on Midway Road. The letter sent back in March also included a fonn of Release of Perpetual Conservation Easement for your review. On March 29th I had a phone conversation with the County's Environmental Resource Division concerning the request and was advised that the property had been inspected and that the Division did not object to the request and that they would be conveying their comments to you within the following week. I am not aware of any other County departments or other third parties that object to the request. For a number of business and personal reasons, Mr. Mayo is hoping that this request can be considered by the Board before the later part of May. Therefore, if it is at all possible, it would be much appreciated if this request could be scheduled for either the Board's May 4th or May )] th meeting. If there is anything I can do to assist, please let me know, otherwise, I will wait to hear from you. Sincerely, ærLlr v4,pòlj ~" '. pw~?O, ; ; ~~~D ~~\ f\ L.}: {y V)J;~~ vJ'i'( Ene. cc: John A. Mayo Gary Basham rst.:11896:2 RUDEN, McCLOSKY, SMITH, SCHUSTER & RUSSELL, P.A. "" ...." DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS Environmental Resources Division MEMORANDUM TO: Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney FROM: Amy Mott, Environmental Regulations Supervisor DATE: April 23, 2004 RE: Release of Perpetual Conservation Easement Midway Industrial Park - Phase II ............................................................................... Environmental Resources Division has reviewed the request for the release of the perpetual conservation easement over the wetland on Mr. Mayo's property within the phase II of the Midway Industrial Park. In light of its poor quality and the absence of listed species in the 1.87 acre wetland we support the off-site mitigation in the way of purchasing 2.1 credits from the Bluefield Ranch Mitigation Bank. A permit to allow impacts to the wetland and review of mitigation calculations will still be required from SFWMD. ERD requests to be copied on all correspondences with the district on this matter. The preliminary site plan included in the Mitigation Plan shows the wetland to the north to be preserved. At time of official site plan submittal we will require the submittal of a management plan addressing issues including exotic plant removal and native plantings in the wetland and surrounding upland buffers. We do not expect this action to set a precedent for lifting of other wetland conservation easements in the Midway Industrial Park as the other wetlands are in much better condition and thus have higher functional value. Please feel free to contact us should you be in need of further assistance. C:IDOCUMENTS AND SETTINGSIADMINISTRATORILOCAL SETTINGSITEMPIMIDWAY IND PHASE II . WETLAND. DOC '" ..." Prepared by and return to: lolmathan A. Ferguson Ruden, McClosky, Smith, Schuster & Russell, P.A. 145 NW Central Park Plaza, Suite 200 Port St. Lucie, FL 34986 RELEASE OF PERPETUAL CONSERVATION EASEMENT This Release of Perpetual Conservation Easement ("Release") is made this _ day of , 2004, by and between John A. Mayo ("Owner"), with his address at 1207 S.W. 87th Terrace, Plantation, Florida and St. Lucie County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("County"), with its principal office at 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, John A. Mayo is the owner in fee simple of certain real property in St. Lucie County, Florida, more particularly described in Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property contains a single jurisdictional wetland, approximately 1.87 acres in size, for which the legal description is more particularly described in Exhibit "B", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference ("Wetland"); and WHEREAS, on September 14,2000, Owner's predecessor in interest, Midway Properties of St. Lucie County, L.C. and Ron Thomas Jones and Cody Jones as ancillary Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Thomas C. Jones, granted a Perpetual Conservation Easement ("Easement") to St. Lucie County for the Wetland, said Easement was recorded at Official Record Book 1330, Page 2441, of the public records ofSt. Lucie County, Florida; and WHEREAS, the Owner commissioned an environmental study ("Study") of the Wetland which was prepared by R.L. Weigt Environmental Consultants, Inè. and which was completed in October 2003; and WHEREAS, the Study indicates that the Wetland is isolated and of poor quality because of severe hydrological impacts caused by the development of Midway Road to the south, Jenkins Road to the east and industrial development to the west and the hydrological impact has caused the historically wetland plant species to be replaced by transitional and upland plant species. Furthennore, on-site mitigation opportunities would not be expected to have long tenn viability due to the unsuitable hydrologic conditions, relatively small size of the wetland and the proposed PSl: 11848: 1 ~ ....,¡ industrial development of the site. Finally, preservation of the Wetland will adversely impact the development of the site for uses allowed under its existing Industrial future land use category and Heavy Industrial zoning category; and WHEREAS, since the granting of the Easement, the Bluefield Ranch Mitigation Bank has been created and is available to provide mitigation credits for property in this part of the St. Lucie County; and WHEREAS, the Study indicated, pursuant to State fonnulas, that the Owner would need to obtain 2.1 mitigation credits from the Bluefield Ranch Mitigation Bank in order to utilize the Wetland for future development; and WHEREAS, the Owner has entered into a contract with Bluefield Ranch Mitigation Bank for 2.1 credits; and WHEREAS, under the facts and conditions as presented herein, it is appropriate to release the Wetland from the Perpetual Conservation Easement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above and the mutual covenants, tenns, conditions and restrictions contained herein and pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of Section 704.06, Florida Statutes, the Owner and County agree as follows: 1. Recitals. The recitals set forth above are true and correct and hereby incorporated herein by this reference. 2. County Release. The County hereby releases completely and unconditionally the Wetland described in Exhibit "B" from all of the tenns, conditions and restrictions of the Perpetual Conservation Easement recorded at Official Record Book 1330, Page 2441, of the public records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 3. Mitigation Credits. In return for the County's release of the Wetland from the restrictions of the Easement, the Owner agrees to obtain 2.1 mitigation credits from the Bluefield Ranch Mitigation Bank which shall be obtained, as evidenced by a receipt from the Bluefield Ranch Mitigation Bank, prior to the recording of this Release. 4. Effect of Remaining Easement. The Easement shall remain in full force and effect for all other property not specifically addressed by this Release. PSL:11848:1 - 2 - ....." ....,¡ 5. Existing Easements. This Release shall have no effect on any other existing easements for public roads and highways, public utilities, railroads and pipelines. 6. Binding Effect. All of the effects of this Release herein contained run with the land and shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective executors, administrators, personal representatives, heirs, successors and assigns. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, St. Lucie County has executed this Release and John A. Mayo has accepted this Release on the date written above. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: OWNER: JOHN A. MAYO (Print or type name) (Print or type name) STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2004 by JOHN A. MAYO, who is personally know to me or who has produced as identification. NOTARY PUBLIC PSL: 11848: 1 - 3 - ~ ...." EXHIBIT "A" MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK - PHASE II, LOTS 1 AND 2 AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT RECORDED AT PLAT BOOK 39, PAGE 8, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS THE SOUTH 40 FEET FOR ROAD RIGHT OF WAY AS SHOWN IN OFFICIAL RECORD BOOK 1324, PAGE 917, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. . . .. ;;:1' ',~¡ '.f, I :~~ iÎ(" ~!;T ,.:-.' <, ~~,.~' I~··,j~· , ..1 i ,,:. I ';t:q ":;~ ;r,Þti ,~_...'".~ ~~ ," . ...... ,\:. .... . . -. ~: '" ¡:: :úI~~ :t-.;¡;'J ~I!f~!: . "'" EXHIBIT A PAGELOF ~AGES .."" r I . _h__4 ......._ .~_. .' ....... .,_.._~<oo ......_..._.._ '_'O( DESCRIPTION . ".-.--..- ( LEGAL Being 0 portion of Tracts II and 12. in Ihe Norlhwell one-quarter of 50ction 6, Township J6 South, RonQe 40 Eost, of MOOn lo\NO CO~PANY SUODIV1SION. os recorded in Plot Oook .., PO<Jl' J4. public "~,=o'd. 0' 51. Lucie Lounty, Florida, und being more particulorly dor¡cribed 01 follow.: Commence at the Southeoat comer 0' land:. d"eded to Tre(.ure COOtt Tru.. Co., Inc., a:l r.cordttd In Official Record" Oua" 42'2. fJoÇf!I 278(1, 01 tho public records of 51. Lucie- Coynty. Florldr:J, ,aid point ~nQ In Ihe nurthcorly right-of-way line of West toiidway Rood, on BO fool ..,ide right-of-way. thence N 8g·~4'''ö· Eo alon9 the sold northerly ri~ht-of-",o)' line 0' We,t Midway Rood. a distance t)f 216.56 (eet; thence N 00"05'1'- W 0 distanCe! of J4.59 (eel to the POINT OF' AEGlNNING of the (allowing described Wf!tllInd ·13": Thenco N 07"23'018 W 11 distance of 74.58 feet: thence N 41"4~'128 W a di:stonce of 42.44 (e.t: thence N 04'00'18- If( a dlatonce o( ~6.60 f..t: thence N 14'JJ'5f'- E 0 distance of 47.65 feet; thence N 18"21'04- E a di$tonce of 51.21~ feet; thence N 44'49'JO- E a distance of 95.17 feet; th~l)ce S 74'43'01" E 0 distance of 59.53 feet; thence 5 75"41'078 E a distance of 31.35 (eet; ~hence N J6'44'51- E a c1lstance at 26,33 feet: thence 5 87"2!:1'II· E 0 distance or 27.69 feet; thence S 86"23'40" E a distance of 26.39 feet; thence 5 86"04'578 E a distance 0' 65.JO feet; thence 5 05"39'17- W a dlslance of 43,10 feel; thence 5 16'47'32- E 0 distance of 23.19 leel; thence S 00"04'248 W 0 distance 01 71.38 feet; thence S 13"24'37- W a distance of 57.21 feel; thence S 32'41'398 W a distance of 56.21 teet; thence 5 39" 25' 46- W a distance of 30.99 feet; thence 5 75'46'56- W ° distance of 34.17 feet; thence S 43"09'37· W a distance of 12.4Q teel; thence S 77"29'48- W a distance of 73.06 teet; thence N 8J"05'22- W a distance of 42.85 (eel; thence S 68'46'T 1· W 0 distance of 64.67 'eet to the POINT Or: BEGfNNING. Containing 1.87 acres, more or less. I 1ÐUY ~Trt' THAT 1HS OE:SCRIPOOH NIO ACCOWPNI'I"IfÇ SlŒTOi CXM'l£S .1M 1)£ .......... TEONc:AL. STAHOAROS ~scr F'CR1)4 IN 0i.AP1'ER IICt7-41 ADOP'ÆD BV 1M( f\.ORIDA ØONIO OF LNC] 5UR'Æ't'æS. PURSUANT to F1..ORIOA: STAT\I1t 472.O%T. DA TE:.BY' ArCHARI) C. LA'tÐf1URE. P.L.s, 52O!1, !iI...t 1 øt2 SKETOi OF 9ESCRtPllON OF Wetland -8- ........ ,.,. MIDWA Y INDUSTRIAL PARK CCICU.~ ~ ~ LNG SM'IIE'«ItS - ..... ... ...,. ~ "-':'1'UaIM __ ' (4111') ........, FIe ~.öav Date ð/ltllDa T ectc: r1Ib '. ..: ,::'. ~ L 1',' ."t'. ~'. . ,t;,:',,·:, !. . ,. I ., c ", .1....,;:,'......j t~·(:~,:': ;~ r· ",".. . .;; '. "." ~.: !i::·:r:·~· .:.... ...... " 'l,....:.~. '~;;\::{;:;: ~~ ?::i:::, . ," ' ~; ", y{) ~~~t~.{ ~~ .~.-. ..~:; . '7;~t~s: 1~;¡:;:·;: ;if;;~~ " ..... . , r,:. }.-.: ~t.':· .~ <.. , :": SKETOi OF DESæJPllON Of Wetland -8- ~r.. MIDWAY INDUSTRIAL PARK ~~"J,' -. 1~'>/# ' .<~3 " .,1 ¡:~~.;,. , ':;}~~ tt. ;-:: }~ ,. ~.. ~:<~~ ~¿"N' r~-:--~---~ketch-~-~~--- . ..-.----- ¡ m.llNot.an.¡ , , I I , ¡ MODEL LAND COMPANY SUBDIVISION \ : \Aa ''''_d~ ... "'.1 8_ 4, ....,. ~4, ~ '~"'.h .1 ~ I SI l"". C_I,. rt...1do ¡ Lot 11 : Lot I I : ~77f'ln 7,)'49"[ : S7:1'41'07~C :7,~Ç' 2&,JO : JI.J~' I SN"04"rt : I 1~,30 ¡ ,'. J.~!:~'~~ , . :tð:.., , . . - ~ : S74'4,)'07"C ,*'404'~,I"t: ~ : 59.5J· F-6.JJ ~ .. .. .. 1;18'47'3;" ~ I : 2J.'" $OO-o4'24.W , - .. . I 71.38' ! 1.87~~....1 ! - - . :. : I , t SJft~~.W- I N04"OO"8"W IJ "oJ II 56.60' 577"'2"48·W 30.' 73.06' S1~""'5ð I .:r".lr S.U·.I'~9·W ' 58.21 N.4~2'52"E 42.40' , I CS'4ð'WW S-4J-mJ'JT, SOO"OS'",,"£: : S4.87' 12.;")' 20.00 "'-.. I NT OF BEGlNNNG I · H89"$4' 4(!J 601.8' _ f. .. Mat1h '7'~~~~___-+.S2!~ ~y ~~__._ ~--~l------------------. --------------t--------------------------~í' --- L---_________J.______________ _ Pok1t of Co. ,II ,iéJ .cement Southeast Com.,. o( Trea.wl Coa.t Trues Co., Inc. lands as recorded In a.R. Book <\7.2. ;"09- 2769, public re<:ot'dl of SL l,uço County, flon.:.1o. ~r if 8 £ ... II( 01 ~3 J~ ~ " ~ :1 ~ ;1 Á! it l'" ~ ~ EXHIBIT .3 PAGE~OF.~PAGES ..", 2 rl :=¡ 1 2 -, JI .~I :1 8, CI) uJ ~ 6 . Da.T6 ~ -...." L . NC I.DG1If CII . O«:IID .".., .. - "II« ,.. . I'Vof eocII( -.-.-.-.- Pee - f'CIIft'. _ : ...., -:,. P\.I . ~..... ~ ... ~ .... ~ IIC AaMD N4l IIn.A ftI: 'IV 1tC IIOImf ~-G"_T PC' " ICMo\T 1I0<IO KA_ II __ " . ~ It. ...:2012 fie ~rÅWII Oat.: ð/le/DO CClaUL1ItO IIIGM!ItS .. I.ND IUnÐaItI -....._~ ..., ~ r&.- ~ ClIO 4M-oIU7 Tech: ". . ., :'" t.,,· . .,t:,.,·.: :.1,,: \~ -. . !>:::.~':;' f~ ., " t:" t,,~.':, ¡¡, ' ~> .,. ~;{~."... .: . ,;;.., ..;,.' ~ ::';':/\ .~~. I! .,," .....f' t,·:':';:'·'¡ , ! ",~' .' . '. ~'~"';:"~':'~:' .,.... ";' . ~~. ~/ '~;.';~. 1: 1.4:-~ :", '. '":' . :~t~ /> ~~~:~ #§~MÞ ~~i¡,'~~;~ ßt~~~·¡i 1.';<,::;:,;·~ ~ '" "\"¡'>,:..,' ~~~~;;:~~~~; .",<".i.:~ '\ ,~.':"',';'~I. I~~~' ~, ..' ;" : .:,",-: . ~'~~~:'}1h~i . :':';" -' ~:!;:-- ~1~J~~t~:· ;:~;-~~~;"')". ~~;.~~~::§ · i~.~\ fL~·;>. t:~,-, ,', .. ~~,:'h':.: "~u' {f ¡'t~'~:':i: ~. . ""': :.. (,,:' :'. !, "'r;'~ . ;'...-.. --.-- 04/30/04 F 7.ABWARR FUND 001 001149 001155 001157 001163 001284 001809 101 101001 101002 101006 102 102001 105 107 107001 107003 107134 129 1~0 140001 1 JOOl 183108 185003 185004 310002 315 316 362 382 396 401 ~18 421 441 449 451 461 471 479 491 505 606 615 625 P:O ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ....¡ WARRANT LIST #33- 24-APR-2004 TO 30-APR-2004 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund Section 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning 2004 USDOJ Violence Against Women Grant CSBG Grant FY04 Net Loss Commercial Fishing Stories TRIP Grant FY04 SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust Interlocals Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Impact Fees Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Library .Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper USDOJ Local Law Enf Block Gr FY04 Parks MSTU Fund Port & Airport Fund Port Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial C~r Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Media~ Domestic Relations Hearing Officer FHFA SHIP FY02/03 FHFA SHIP FY03/04 Impact Fees-Parks County Building Fund County Capital Sports Complex Improv Fund Environmental Land Capital Fund Lennard Road 1 - Roadway Capita: Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities NHI Util - Capital Facilities Fu-~d S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Opera~in No Cty Util Dist-Capital Facilities Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Shared Pool Cash-Property Appraiser Impact Fees Fund Law Library Agency Fund Treasure Cove/Ocean Harbor S MSBU GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 1,059,975.34 208.79 12,276.83 257.81 1,513.28 26,605.04 656.07 16,438.24 2,750.00 49,699.60 28,302.73 22,553.52 47,452.84 371.31 2,450,661.28 531.52 400.00 14,390.93 5,225.00 11,939.90 8,608.03 11,717.02 61.75 6,632.50 15,081.35 50.50 18,516.50 265.00 218,183.59 1,098,882.12 22,898.57 169.17 130,190.22 12,604.46 629.72 4,802.61 1,500.80 9,610.13 10,901.88 9,881.52 15,350.00 614.68 163,985.44 250,000.00 208,287.68 18,548.10 17,303.70 6,342.79 6,013,829.86 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 _ 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,555.84 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4,555.84 '-' ""'" ""::e:.... ~~~ 01), ::e: 0 UE-tH NO "-M ^ 0) 0- 11'1 MN .. "-OÞ'l I' "" t:) 0\ o "oC 0\ ..~ I), E-t .... Þ'lH Þ'I 0) E-tE-t Z 1'1 oC : M ~ ø: 't;-~ 0 0 ZE-t H"- 0 :t:) m,.:¡:t: ~OU iä,.:¡ ~E-t: ~~ Q Q 0 Þ'I H 0 > oC 0"-1), 0 ^ g;~> ~O~ UI), 1m IH "" Q 0 0 0) 1'1 11'1 "- 0 I' M 0\ "- 0\ 1-1"" m . '\jCDO m .... I-I,,J 0 0) q1II ø: 1'1 o·,.¡ t:) IQDI M CD Iø: ø: Þ'I >,,,J E-t ,,JS:: m S::CD H g~ t:) :#: Þ'I ~ UIII .. ø: ~ I-IS:: H CD::!::! :.: ....,Q ø: U ø: Q 0111 Þ'I 0 ::!....~ :t: ~ "" ":¡QO U 0 Q) Þ'I 0 .t:.c: > 1'1 . OU ,,J,,J ~ mq IQ :#: 1M U 111'1 0 10) Q II' I.... 1),1"" "-'N oClH DI s:: .... ,,J q 1-1 Q) ø. 0 >, I ~ I/] ,,J DI s:: s:: ::! .... 0 ~ ø: U 0 m ~ Q) .... r-I Þ'I 0 q > ::! 1-1 "- ,.:¡ CD Þ'I '\j Þ'I ,,J Q) :< m r:r. I), I. ",,¡:¡ I. 00 .... ø:0,Q 1-1 ~N~ Q) .c: U:j:t: m ~Þ'I r:r.>OID IN 0 "-Þ'lø: II' ~:;i!- :':UÞ'I ,.... UH~ 10 OU~ Þ'I> '0 I), to Õ~ 10 Þ'lH 10 ø:r:r.1Q I~ '-' ....,¡ ~~.-I :o:ø,~ =:>- ::E: 0 UE-tH N.-I ......'O< ^ N 0" .-I r<l0" .......-II>!I N 'O< (! CO 0..0< CO .. ~ø, E-t CO I>!IH I>!I en E-tE-t Z 0 0< ÇI .-I ~ ø: 't;~ 0 0 ZE-t H...... 0 ~(! tfh':¡=: §gu =:,.:¡ ~E-tÇl ~~ ~ ~ 0 I>!I H 0 > 0< O......ø, 0 ^ re§> ø, I>!I 0<0ø: Uø, tI1 H 'O< ~ 0 0 N N .-I ...... 0 N r<I CO ...... CO H'O< tI1 'tIQlO tI1 CO H'µ 0 en 1111/1 ø: 0 OOM (! . IX!tß .-I QI ,ø: ø: I>!I ),,µ E-t ,µ¡:: tI1 ¡::QI H g~ (! # I>!I ~ UI/1.. ø: H¡:: H QI~~ :0: OM ,Q ø: U ø: 01/1 I>!I 0 ~oM~ =: ~ N ":¡ÇlO U .-I QI I>!I # .s::.s:: > . OU ~ ,µ,µ t/III ø: IX! ÇI # , CO U ,.-I 0 'co ÇI 'I' ,.-I ø,''O< ......, N O<'H tß ¡:: OM U ,µ ,.:¡ III ,.:¡ H QI 1/1 Po QI 0 0 , ~ OM 1/1 t tß ¡:: QI OM tI1 ~ ø: 0 ~ t/ fà OM .-I I>!I .-I III > OM H ...... 0 QI I>!I III 'tI I>!I rz. QI ~ rz. tß ø, ¡:: 'O<H 'M 00 .-I ø:O,Q H :O:NH QI =: III ,µ U~=: tI1 ~I>!I rz.;"\D 1.-1 0 ......I>!IÞ: II' t~ .. :O:UI>!I 1.-1 UH~ '0 OU~ I>!I> '0 ø,t/ Õ~ '0 I>!IH 10 ø:rz.1X! I~ ~ """'" ~~n ~ø,~ =>< :£ 0 tJE-<H NCO .....M ^ en 0" I' C"'tO·· .....nrz:¡ N ... t!) ... O...c M ..~ø, , E-< ID rz:¡H rz:¡ E-<E-< Z .c ~ § P: 0~ 0 0 ZE-< H..... 0 ~t!) fIl..:l= ~~tJ =..:1 OE-<~ ~~~ ~ ~ 0 rz:¡ H 0 > .c O.....ø, 0 ^ re~> ø, rz:¡ .cOP: tJø, IfIl IH ... ~ 0 0 en N I' ..... 0 N M ... ..... M ~... fIl 'tI1D0 fIl ID ~~ 0 a! 111 P: 0·... t!) IQOI ID IP: P: rz:¡ >.~ E-< ~s:: fIl S::ID H g~ t!) :II: rz:¡ ~ tJ 111 .. P: ~s:: H ID::S::S ~ ....,Q P: tJ P: n UIl1 rz:¡ 0 ID ::s.....\<: = ~ I' ..:I~U tJ ID ID rz:¡ ... ,¡::,¡:: > 0 'UtJ 0 ~~ n fila! ... IQ 0 :II: IN tJ In 0 ICO ~ II' In Ø,I", .....,N .c'H 01 s:: .... ~ a! ~ ID P- O I rz:¡ 111 ~ 01 s:: .... ~ P: 0 t/ ~ III n rz:¡ U a! > .... ~ ..... ~ ID rz:¡ ! 'tI rz:¡ ID ~ fr< ø, ~ ...~ 0 00 P:O,Q .\<: ~N~ s:: = ., III tJ~= IQ ~rz:¡ fr<><1D 10 0 .....rz:¡P: II' t~.. ~tJrz:¡ In tJH~ 10 OtJ~ rz:¡> 10 Ø,fIl Ð~ 10 rz:¡H 10 P:fr<IQ I~ '" ....,¡ ~~.-I I<:Øt~ =>< :E 0 UE-tH NI' '-1"1 ^ Lt'I 0.. ID 1"10\" '-01iQ 0 ..,. t!) 0 0..1( ..,. ..~Øt E-t I\!IH IZ1 E-tE-t Z I( ¡::a ~ It: ~~ 0 0 ZE-o H'- 0 ¡::at!) t/~= ~ªU =~ ~E-t~ ~~ ~ ~ 0 IZ1 H 0 > I( O'-Øt 0 ^ re~> Øt IiQ I(O~ UØt tI) I H l. ..,. ¡::a 0 0 Lt'I N ID '- 0 0 1"1 0 '- "*' .¡..,. t/ 't:!Q)0 t/ .¡., 0 flSlII ~ 0·... t!) 1Qt:n Q) I~ ~ IZ1 >''' E-o .,¡: t/ ¡:Q) H 5~ t!) '* I IZ1 ~ I UIII" ~ I .¡¡: H I Q);:I;:I I<: 1+ ....,Q~ U ~ :~ 0111 IZ1 0 ;:I....'!O: = ~ . ~~O U I"*, Q) IZ1 10 .s::.s:: > I I . OU 10\ .,., IN tl)fIS I I IQ '"*' '* IN U 10\ 0 II' ~ II' 1.-1 ø.."*, '-'N I(IH t:n ¡: .... ., lIS .¡ Q) 0. 0 I IZ1 III § t:n ¡: .... > ~ lIS 0 en ~ M IZ1 M lIS > lIS .¡ '- I-¡ Q) IZ1 Q) 't:! IiQ -a Q) ~ Q) .... .... Øt ..,.I-¡ I-¡ 00 10 1t:0,Q I,Q ~N~ II-¡ IllS U~= ,= ~1iQ ....><ID I"*, 0 '-1iQ~ .0 t:~.. I<:UIiQ 1M UH~ .0 OU~ I'ZI> 10 Øttl) Ð~ '0 I\!IH '0 It:....ø:I ,= '-" "wi "":£.-1 :':Ptfà OPt :J:;'< :£ 0 UE-<H 1'11'1 '-"" ^ M I' .. (X) 1'11'1" '-orzl (X) "" ~ III 0..1( III ..~Pt E-< I' rzlH rzI ~E-< Z Q § P: ~~ 0 0 ZE-< H'- 0 A~ t/)..:I:J: ~gu :J:..:I ~E-<Q ~~ Q A 10 rzI H 10 > I( O'-Pt 0 ^ ~~&; I(OP: UPt t/) H "" A 0 0 M 1'1 (X) '- I' (X) 1'1 III '- III \.I"" t/) 'èCDO t/) I' \.I.J 0 I\! 01 P: 0·... ~ 1Xt» CD IP: P: rzI >,.J E-< .J~ t/) S::CD H g~ ~ # rzI ~ + U 01 .. P: ~ \.IS:: H Q)::I::I :.: 0'" ,Q P: U P: "" 001 f1I 0 0 ::I."'~ :J: fà '- ..:I A 0 U 0 Q) rzI M .r:.r: > '- . OU "" .J.J t/)I\! rzI IX Pt # 'ID U 1.-1 0 IN Q II' 1.-1 Pt."" '-'1'1 I('H t» ~ 0'" .J I\! \.I Q) ø. 0 I ~ 01 t» ~ 0'" > P: I\! 0 t/) fà .-i ~ .-i I\! I\! \.I '- \.I Q) rzI CD 'è rzI 'è Q) ~ Q) z, z, Pt ""\.I \.I 00 0 P:O,Q ,Q tíN~ \.I II! U~:J: :J: ~f1I z,;'<ID 1M 0 '-rzlP: .0 t~.. :':UrzI 1M UH! 10 OU~ rzI> 10 Ptt/) Ð~ 10 I!/IH 10 P:z,1X I:J: ~ ...., 04/::: '=4 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - 30Þ~~D F?:l, ::'~'i~:m VOID LIST# 33- 24-A?R-2004 TO 30-APR-2004 hJt\-::: 001 - General Fund CHE:~ INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 003::~56 12416196 Day Dreams Uniforms Ine 12416233 12416233 12416233 12416233 12416233 12416233 14.30 80.25 248.67 56.63 157.70 240.26 141.00 938.81 CHECK TOTAL: FUND TOTAL: 938.81 PAGE 1 · ~ ....,¡ 04/30/04 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD F7.ABWARR VOID LIST# 33- 24-APR-2004 TO 30-APR-2004 ruND: 145 - Mosquito Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00310688 12416848 Clarke Mosquito Control Produc 12416849 2,970.00 1,980.00 4,950.00 CHECK TOTAL: FUND TOTAL: 4,950.00 PAGE 3 '" J .- '-' AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. .!4..J DATE: May 4,7004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: ~ Michael Powley, P,E, County Engineer SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: Professional Engineering Services for Stormwater Management - Work Authorization NO.2 with Bowyer, Singleton & Associates, Inc. - Whiteway Dairy Road at 5-Mile Creek Culvert Replacement. BACKGROUND: The attached work authorization with Bowyer, Singleton & Associates, Inc., is for engineering design and permitting services to replace the metal culvert pipes presently used to carry Whiteway Dairy Road across 5-Mile Creek, The existing construction is in excess of 20 years old and in need of replacement. FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds will be made available in 101003-41131-563005-43032 TransportationTrustlLocalOption- Culverts. Funds will be re-allocated from funds 101003-41131-599300-400 ($20,898) and 101003-41131-599330-400 ($31,894). PREVIOUS ACTION: nla RECOM MENDA TION: Staff recommends Board approve Work Authorization No, 2 with Bowyer, Singleton & Associates, Inc. for Whiteway Dairy Road at 5-Mile Creek Culvert Replacement in the amount of $52,792, approval of capital project CAP 04-086 for Whiteway Dairy Road at 5-Mile Creek, and authorize the Chairman to sign. COMMISSION ACTION: r 1 APPROVED [ ] DENIED rx OTHER: Pulled prior to meeting. Anderson nty Administrator [x]County Attorney [x]Originating Dept, Public WorkS~~ whiteway dairy M2bowyer.ag,r ' ~/ Coordination/Sianatures [X)Mgt. & Budget U,() ~ Ix]Co, Eng M V P [ ]Purchasing Mgr._ [x]Rev, Coord. E>A t1 >- £t:: « ::æ: ::æ: :) en t- () W ., o £t:: a.. I~I~I~I w U ~ III ZCl)CI)CI) ë(WWW :::iE>->->- "C" .:.: Ic W C U w>w ~ !i!0!!2 .. I- x, W 0:: > CCI) :::iEa..~ We :::iEa.. ~Z...Io<c a..o<cu w-I-w 0:: Cl)ä: 0:: a..!!2<c w:::iEu !;e ~ .. CU~ >- l- e> Z e Z :J II. ::æ: ~ C) o £t:: a.. t- z w ::æ: w > o £t:: a.. ::æ: ...J « !:: a.. « () () cj o m >- t- Z :) o () w () :) ...J ¡...: en >- W ...I 3: o a.. w ..u o::z ..!2<c ::""z I-I-W UUI- wwz ooë( 0::0:::::iE a.. a.. z o ~ > o z w 0:: ~ W W a:: ü W ...I :E L() @) o <C o a:: >- a:: <i: o ~ ~ W l- I ~ I ><1 !z !z zWw 0::2:::2: _ww I-üü u:5:5 :Jc..c.. o::ww ¡;a::a:: Zl-I- o a:: a:: uww ::»> >...1...1 W:J:J Züü Z -Z o zo iñ 2¡:: -..1-< >I-a..u .. e U ~ ¡¡: W , W U ¡:: ~!z0:3~ zwg:c, l-:::iEu..l-l- 1rl1t01rl1rl o;f~oo 0:: w >-0:: 0:: a..CI-a..o.. '-' r 3: o ...I W ID I- Z :J o :::iE <c ...I ...I ¡¡: CI) W >- II. - x: o z I CI) w >- ú.i U z <c z e 0:: o in w ~ a.. U ::¡ ID :J a.. æ CI) It ~ 0:: w C Z :J CI) W ¡¡: ::¡ <c :J a I- U W , ~ a.. CI) ~ I- >: ž:l! 20 !;ell) U.;; oU ...I~ 1-0 UO:: WQ. o~ g:~ OOOOONOOOOOON Ø) Ø) .... .... Ñ N It) It) OOOOONOOOOOON (j) (j) r- r- N" N L() L() ~ CI) 0 o U .... U ã 0:: Q. Q I!:! 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 010 0 0 0 0 :;;: ~ ~ ~ ¡:::: L() It) ~ CI) w ~~ W:;: a.. LL ~ 0 ~ j: <c~ z :iõ ::¡ z w:'S 0:: D.. (/) u > c::: (/) -'z ~2 01- (j)U (/):J ~~ OCl) C:::z 0..0 (,) f- Z LlJ (/) ~ ~ 5 15° -' LlJ 5 ù:i (9 aJ g¡ z I::: f- Bozo:: -'o..C:::w 5~_::::>J: aJ LLI- o N (j) r- N" L() (9 z ëi: o f- Z o LlJ ~ u ð~ ¡:: LlJ <C (/) (9 f- ¡:: aJ ~ ~ .:.¡ <C :6 ~I- (/) LlJ LlJ U ~ :'S <C 0.. is u z :J ~ g¡ o 0.. <C £; oð(/) Z f- LlJ c::: (9<C o o o o N Ø) .... N It) o ..."" (j) Ø) r- r- N" N L() It) o 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 ON 0 Ø) .... N It) .:.¡ ~ o l- Ii) x: 0:: <c :::iE W 0:: N (j) r-. N L() (f) w ~ I- ~ C9 '" o o ~ o ~ N M o M .,. It) o o M CD It) I .... M .... .... .,. M o o .... o .... :i¡; I- Z ::J o U u ~ CD 00 o I "It o c.. « u :i¡; " w 0:: c.. :¡¡: -I « l- e:: « u ""r...... ...., WORK AUTHORIZATION NO.2 Engineering Services Related to Stormwater Management C03-05-369 for Whiteway Dairy Road at Five Mile Creek Pursuant to that certain Agreement Between County and Engineer for Engineering Services (the "Agreement") between St. Lucie County (the "County") and Bowyer-Singleton & Associates, Jnc. (the "Engineer") dated May 13, 2003, the Engineer agrees to provide the additional Scope of Services described in Exhibit "A" and for the additional Compensation described in Exhibit "B". All services provided under this Work Authorization shall be completed according to the schedule described in Exhibit "C". IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Engineer has affixed his, its, or their names, or name, on the dates below. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ENGINEER By:lllØf~ Print Name: ¡fIA"LE. 4/Þ4161L Bowyer, Singleton & Associates, Inc. Date: 4!'Z.z!,t/ ~ ...." EXHIBIT "A" SCOPE OF WORK Article I Project Description The COUNTY hereby retains the ENGINEER to furnish Engineering Services for the following development: 1. Culvert Replacement - Whiteway Dairy Road at Five Mile Creek including design survey and subsurface investigations. The above described services and improvements are hereinafter called the PROJECT. Article II Services bv Enqineer The consulting services that the ENGINEER shall furnish to the COUNTY under this Work Authorization shall include: Task I - Culvert Replacement Preparation ENGINEER will perform the engineering design, analysis and plans preparation necessary for the project. Project includes the following areas: · Cost effective concrete culvert to be located at centerline of existing culvert with 70-80' roadway right-of-way. · Subsurface Investigation, as described herein. · Design Survey, as described herein. · NSLRWCD Permitting and SFWMD Permitting. The plans will be prepared based on conversations, COUNTY's preferences and ENGINEER's judgment. · Temporary - 2 Lane Bypass to accommodate two-way traffic. '-" ....., Task 11- BiddinQ Assistance ENGINEER will prepare Bid Tabulations Section 300 as necessary to assist the COUNTY with bidding the project. ENGINEER will attend a pre-bid meeting as scheduled by the COUNTY. Final Deliverables ENGINEER will provide the following final deliverables for this phase of the project: · Construction Plans - 24" x 36" Bond Paper ~ 10 sets at the 100% Submittal ~ 1 set of Final Plans (looseleaf for reproduction) ~ 1 set of Final Plans (Signed and Sealed) · Bidding Documents (Section 300) - 8%" x 11" Bond Paper ~ 3 sets at Final Submittal ~ 1 set with Final Plans (looseleaf for reproduction) ~ Microsoft Word digitaJ file of documents ArticJe III County's Responsibilities The COUNTY's responsibilities include the following: Coordinate the COUNTY requirements for the PROJECT with the ENGINEER. Article IV Compensation and Payments to the Enaineer A. Payment for Basic Services The COUNTY will pay the ENGINEER a lump sum of FIFTY TWO THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED NJNETY TWO DOLLARS ($52,792.00) for the Services. See Exhibit "B" for the man hour breakdown. '-' "WII Compensation for these services shall be billed by the ENGINEER and paid by the COUNTY not more than once per month in progress payments in proportion to services performed. "-" i ex:> ..- .!! LO ..- ex:> f ~ M ai Lri 0> ..- 0> ~ ..- ~ ~ ~ < ~ 0 0 0 0 0 1ñ 4!:- ..t 0 N cx:j 8 '~ ,... ex:> CD ~ ~ C") N CD IV IÔ å ai iii C") C") C/) ~ ~ ¡¡ e b ex:> "'" ::s 0> CD .2 'B ,... C") ..- c: < C") "'" :i .æ 0 0 ~ 0 0 Lri 0 0 Lri Lri N ..- ..... ..... cö ~ ~ ..- ~ LO LO ..- 0 .... N N .æ IV 0 0 0 a: 0 0 0 ~ cO cO ci 0> 0> 5 ~ ~ ~ J: I!! ., 0 tn ;¡:; 0 0 0 c W tV (;) :IE ~........~. ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ Wæ 0:: 0 0 N J .~ ai ai LO tl)þ,. 0 0 0> .... .... ri .... ~O 0 ~ ~ .... ª J: ~ æŒ J: x Ww CD N ex:> W Ww 0 N N 11.1- ..- .... (..') Z 0 W 0 0 0 0 0 Lri Lri Lri ex:> C") C") LO .... .... ai ~ ~ ~ ..... "'" .... LO .... ..... - c 0 0 GI E 0 0 0 N N 0 GI ..... ..... ci u ..- ..- ~ ns ~ ~ 'ii GI 0:: 1:: GI C 0 0 0 > 0 '5 :¡:¡ (.) I! 'C ns ns CL 'C f Q) 0 '" 0:: 0- '> ~ III Q) ë a:: ¡¡ c 0> ~ ns ... E c ã: GI ~ C C ~ ,ß! >- 011 ... ;::: co UJ ; C ~ .... ã. ïñ - 0> UJ .! c:Ð ~ M 0:: <1: :c 'iii ... 1:: GI ns ;: C ~ 0> C > ï5 iù >. :; "'0 E ë a:¡ u ä:i tV ,2 z 'C ë. f!! = Õ 'c tV .31: .31: Q) 0 a. .æ .~ '" f!! UJ UJ Q) IV co co D- O D- O l- I- -= = N 0 0 ...~. <0 0 C") <0 LO <0. 0) ..... ..... N ('I) ..... ~ LO ~ ~ ~ C/) c: - c: 0 C/) :¡:: 0 ,Q CO (,) (¡j - :3 ~ CI a. CO :¡:: E C/) ñi Q) Q) 0 C/) >- > Q) (,) ~ Q) .£ I.L. Q) ~ 0> E Q) 'S: :3 U I.L. ~ C/) -ê :3 Ü cd:: c: E ~ CI :3 'x ñi iii C/) CO - - .c ::?i c: 0 Q) :3 0 I- 0 C/) ñi (,) ~ - - - ñi 0 - e- ~ :::!;;;;. 0 I- ¡,; c 0 '¡¡j '> X .... N f!! 0 '- ca ci ci .S! c:Ð Q) Z Z '" C - $ $ c E CO 0 '¡:; co co '" 'ê a. $ E ,5 ra 0 co ~ f!! GI ~ ûí a. E Q) CL W W > a. ,¡::; '~ ¡ cd:: UJ "'0 "'0 W 0> 0> Q) 'C ~ ¡¡¡ UJ UJ ¡¡j :J U 'S; 'S; Q) .. E U 'ë: 0> 0> ~ 0:: 0:: ø .E (,) W 'C ....... ....... ....... Q) '" >< '> f!! ~ ~ ~ ~ -'It Co 0>- E~ ~'It co ã. 0> a: 1:: 0> > :; U "'0 co o 0:: ~ ïli o >- co ~ $ :c ~ ID - :3 :c x w u C ui $ co ï3 o UJ In <1: C o ãí æ C èñ I Q; ~ o ID tnz W,·.~ ~o ~Q w.~ (1);6 (.!)et:: zm æct W::) wo zx -z (.!)<c li:2 en z ::s c.. ~ ::; o <C o a::: ... c CD E CD ~ u ra C) - Q. N CD ~ a::: 1::: CD c ~ 0 ::::I ~ (.) I'! 'C ra "0 Q. Q) ra If) 0 e '> ca::: c. Q) e::: ~ I/) ëã c ra .. C c:: CD ~ c e >- oð .. ra ~ ro- ~ c .... - CD C) C") ~ ¡ñ ~ ~ .. ~ CD ra C :e Qj >. E ¡: 00 (t 0 z :;::: "0 Õ Co Q) ... '¡: (t Q) u Co Qj "ë' If) ~ 1V Q) a.. 0 a.. 0 ~ "W11Í >- >- ~ (t ~ . "0 "0 (t (t 0 0 e::: .!!l e::: - b ëü - If) N - If) If) Q) If) (t II 0 (t Co Co >- ..... ~ >- 00 ::I 00 Co Qj Õ Co E ~ ::I E Q) ... ~ - ~ en en I~¡ "It 0 (þ CO N 0 C) ~ N C) . C) N CO .... ~ .... CO CO 0 0 C") 0 0 ~ 0 0 N N (þ .... r0- M . ~ (0 CO N 0 ~ N 0 ~ 0 (0 (0 ..... ~ ..- CO CO ('t) ~ N N ~ " ..- ..... ..... ..- ..- ..- ..... ..- ..... ..... ..- N E E E E E E ., .. ..... :J ..... :J ::J ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Q) :J ::J :J Q.) en Q.) en en Q.) Q) Q) Q.) Q) Q) Q) Q.) Q) en en en .c .c Q.) Q.) Q.) Q.) Q.) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q.) Q) Q) 0 0 .c Q, .c Q, Q, .c .c .c .c .c .c .c .c .c .c Q, Q, Q, C\1 C\1 en E en E E en en en en en en en en en en E E E w W :J :J ::J :J ::J ::J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ! > I/) Q) ~... ro E I/) I/) ;¡:¡ 2 ~ 0> I/) ::J c: W Ü :s;: ..... .... I/) :J C\1 0 .... ..... !!l ~ U c::;- O> en I/) c: cu !!l I/) 0 ..... 1:' 0 E ~ c: c: E ~ ..... Q) IE Q) <c Q) ]i C\1 ~ 'Ë C\1 !!l 0 ..... ro E E c: Q) 0 .... ~ Q. >- .... 'ê I/) ïii Q.) 0 Z I- Q) 0 Q) 'Ë ~ ..... 0> - > 0 ~ ro c.. Q) "ê I/) C\1 CD c.. I/) .... 0 ..... ¡¡:: 0 ro m c: 0 c.. If) Q.) I Q) ::J e c: ..... 0 Q) c: :s;: 3: - ..... c.. - 0 'ê ::; c: 1:' 0 0 0 0 >- c.. c: cu 0 ß 0 0 0 Q.) ~ z U I ~ ro 0 0 u c: c: ;¡:¡ Q.) '> I.,., ;¡:¡ ..... 0> Q) ro ro ro .c If) 0 ...J 1:' Q) ro "ê ::; C\1 c: 0 0 m c: c: en c: 0> ..... U Q) 0> E ~ E Ü Q) c:: Q) ::J a::: c: a::: ro 0 If) c: Q, Q) ::; Q) If) 1:' 'õ cu ïñ ..... If) ;¡:¡ E E .... I/) c: 'c E 1:' c: ...J 'õ' c: Q.) c: Q.) ..... e e 'iu c: Q) Q) ~ :J Q.) en LL :J .... ro ..... 0 Q, Q) 0> 0 C\1 Q) en <.9 z en en c.. c: c: c.. en a::: w u ~ U5 u ã: ü: ~ c: 3: o 1:' ~ ro ~ CD .... ::J o .c c: ro ~ If) c: ro c: >- C\1 3: 1:' ro o a::: u c: If)- Q.) ro 'õ o If) If) <C c: B ~ 0> c: U5 ¿ Q) ~ CD ~ ..., c := 0 "C ~ ctI ~ CD .... :::¡ 0 .c c ctI ~ >- "E 0 0 0 M c: 0 U a> (I) v <D <D N CI) I- Z UJ ~ ffl..~ ::J ü (Ji;t 0 V <D <D ""!'O 0 N 1..0 I- ~m Ü ~ ø.·~ c::: II) I- a> ~œ z u æ~ 0 .-- .-- .-- '~ w·:;) ü 0) wO -. CI) Zx CI) C> -~ UJ ,£ C)·.ce Ü "C ~....2! E "C :> :::¡ ffi c::: CI) .c .c UJ u u CI) c. ctI ctI E UJ UJ (') :::¡ ... Z ...J C Õ Q) E 0 Q) CD U IV ã.. Q) 0::: t: Q) c ~ 0 ~ ; 0 I! 'C IV C> IV Q, 0 Q) c 0::: ... II) :¡:j U D.. - 0) c 0) E ~ II) 0) ~ ë¡ c E cñ IV ... :t:: C Q) ~ :::¡ 0) ã: u 0 - c 0 0 ~ ctI >. ... - u 'õ IV oð IV "'" 0 en ::2 ~ c 3: .... "C C 0 - :¡:j II) Q) m M ffi 0) c II) ~ ëñ JI: 0) 0 <{ .c ... - ~ :¡:j Q) IV U U c 3: c ~ ~ "C :::¡ 0 - ffi .... Q) åi - >. c II) Õ> E ë 0 I C CO II) Ü ~ 0 c Z ,Q "C ~ a. ü ü5 Õ ã. !!! "C "C ¿ .;:: ctI a> 0 CO åi c. c c 0) C- O) 0) ~ 'õ' tJ a> - ~ ~ a> ~ CO :£ :£ a. 0 a. 0 a. CD .' , ...., ...Î AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C2b DATE: #41õ4 REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: ( X ) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: (,~~~i-\))e&L- Public Works Director SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS - ADMIN SUBJECT: Port of Fort Pierce Entrance Road (North 2nd Street). Work Authorization No.2 with Taylor Engineering. BACKGROUND: North 2nd Street serves as the main entrance to the Port of Fort Pierce. In September of 1997, the County entered into a Joint Participation Agreement (JPA) with the Florida Department of Transportation for design of a proposed flyover entrance into the northern portion of the Port of Ft. Pierce. The "flyover" concept originated in the 1996 Port Charrette that was developed by the City of Fort Pierce. The concept involved a direct connection between US 1 and the Port Property, with an elevated "tlyover" that would cross over the FEC Railroad tracks. A feasibility Study for the tlyover was completed in 2000 by LBFH. The flyover design would require extensive use ot Port Property to achieve the necessary transition and grade change. Existing businesses at the Port would be impacted by the right-of-way acquisition. In December of 2001, the County began the process ot developing a new Master Plan for the Port of Fort Pierce. The Master Plan was formulated through a series of public meetings and public hearings. The completed Master Plan is a policy document that contains goals and objections for the development of the Port property. The Port Master Plan contemplates development of the majority of the remaining vacant property into "mega-yacht'" usage. In April ot 2002, the County advertised an RFP for Development of the 87 acres ot vacant land that currently exists at the Port. Several proposals were submitted by Development Groups. All ofthe proposers agreed that the flyover entrance design would not be compatible with mega-yacht development. The proposers recommended that improvements of 2nd Street as the primary Port Entrance would be more compatible with mega-yacht usage and development. All ot the conceptual plans that were developed for mega-yacht development of the Port use North 2nd Street as the primary access to the Port Facilities. As a result of this desired change in port land usage, the county has initiated plans to improve North 2nd Street as the primary access to the Port. In March of this year, the County selected Taylor Engineering to develop a proposal tor the design of 2nd Street Improvements. The attached Work Authorization No.2 for Taylor Engineering outlines the work required to perform a detailed topographic and utility survey for the existing North 2nd Street. This survey will also identify the existing and proposed right-ot-way needs for the corridor. Additional right-ot-way will be needed to improve the intersections and provide for landscaping improvements. I~_;:-- _.- '-' ...,¡ FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available in 140306-4315-563003-4&:.5Ó2. PREVIOUS ACTION: 6/8/99-BOCC approved extension of JPA (R~s. 99-126) 9/8/98-BOCC approved Scope of Services with LBF&H to perform the PD&E Study. 9/9/97 -Approval of JPA with FDOT for $1.2 million. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval of Work Authorization NO.2 with Taylor Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $90,256.00 for Surveying and Engineering services related to North 2nd Street Improvements and authorization for the Chairman to sign. COMMISSION ACTION: X'APPROVED 0 DENIED 'CfOTHER: Approved 5-0 Á Dou as Anderson Co nty Administrator 181 Originating Dept: (Pub. Wks.) 181 Purchasing: ¿:j¡ P Review and Approvals c Q,ð /.,1.0.- 181 County Attorney: ~ 4- Ð 181 Management and BUdget:~ !hmt};¡ o Parks & Recreation: o Environmental lands: 181 Finance: o Other Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. , , "" ....., WORK AUTHORIZATION NO.2 Engineering Services Related to Port Engineering Services C02-07-522 for Port ofFt. Pierce Entrance Road (North 2nd Street) Pursuant to that certain Agreement Between County and Engineer for Engineering Services (the "Agreement") between St. Lucie County (the "County") and Taylor Engineering, Inc. (the "Engineer") dated July 23, 2002, the Engineer agrees to provide the additional Scope of Services described in Exhibit "A" and for the additional Compensation described in Exhibit "B". All services provided under this Work Authorization shall be completed according to the schedule described in Exhibit "C". IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Engineer has affixed his, its, or their names, or name, on the dates below. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: ENGINEER BY: Print Name: Taylor Engineering, Inc. Date: . A~r-Z3-C4 04:51pm Frcm-TdYLOR ENGINEERiNG iNC 9047319847 T-311 D aZI07 F-5ZC j "" "wi Attachment A Port of Fort Pierce Entrance Road (North 2nCl Street) SCOPE OF SERVICES - LAND SURVEYING SERVICES PROJECT SCOPE Right-of-Way, topographiC, and engineering land surveying services of North 2nd Street from S.R. A- 1-A (Seaway Drive) lo the northern terminus at the south line of Parcel 213-004-010/8 (1100'+/- north of Avenue M) in the City of Fort Pierce, 51. Lucie County. Date: 4123/2004 Intersection roads/streets also included: · S.R. A-1-A (Seaway Drive) - extending 100' west and east of North 2nd Street · Avenue H / Fisherman's Wharf / Terminal Drive - extending 100' west and east of North 2nd Street · AvenuB H from U.S. Highway 1 to North 2DCI Street. Extend topography 100' north and south of Avenue H at U.S. Highway 1 and FECRR mainline. · Intersecting Roads and F.E.C.R.R. Spur Lines o Trailer Park Road #1 - extending 100' west of North 2nd Street o Avenue G - extending 100' west of North 2nd Street o Trailer Park Road #2 - extending 100' west of North 2nd Street o FECRR Spur Track #100 o Port Avenue - extending 100' east of North 2ftCl Street o FECRR Spur Track #92 o Avenue M - extending 100' east of North 2nd Street SURVEYING SERVICES Horizontal and Vertical Control and Baseline Of Survey · Establish the primary Sectional and RW control throughout limits of Project · Establish Baseline of Survey/Centerline of RW · Establish and set permanent control points with reference points at the begin and end of project; all P.I.'s, P.C.'s and P.T.'s; and at intersections with all existing road RW's · Establish and set control points at every even 100' station · Establish all existing RW lines and easements of record · Provide signed and sealed copies of Horizontal Control (Project Network Control) Plan · Bearings and coordinates shall be relative to state plane coordinates. Florida East Zone · Provide vertical control survey, including a closed benchmark run from an established County benchmark for the limits of the Project · Establish and set permanent benchmarks outside the limits of construction at a maximum spacing of 600' along the limits of the Project (total of 7 benchmarks) · Provide description and location by station and offset ot benchmarks on Project Network Control Plan · Vertical information shall be relative to NGVD 1929 vertical datum. Roadway Cross Sections Provide complete roadway crOSS sections along the Project baseline. at: · The beginning and end of the Project limits · Even 100' stations · P.C.'s. P.T.'s and 50' stations along curves · High points and low points 1of6 ¡ Ap,r-23-C4 04:52pm From··'VLOR ENGINEERING INC "" 904731984 T T-3!! n n3/0T F-5ZD ...., Attachment A Port of Fort pierce Entrance Road (North 2nd Street) SCOPE OF SERVICES - LAND SURVEYING SERVICES Date: 4/23/2004 Provide roadway crosS sections along intersecting roads. at: · 10', 25', 50'. and 100' (where applicable) east and/or west of the RW lines of North 2114 Street · Include also cross sections at all high points and low points · Include also elevations at P.C.. midpoint and P.T. of all return radii Within the RW limits, cross sections shall include (where applicable): · RW lines · Back edge and front edge of sidewalks/paths · Centerline of swales and/or top of bank and toe of slope of ditches · Back of curb · Edge of pavement and Centerline of pavement · All lane lines of multilane roads · Edge of pavement and bacK of curb (or top of traffic separator) at raised medians · High point and/or breaklines of pavement cross slopes Furnish all croSS sections and existing centerline profiles in electronic AutoCAD DWG file format per Roadway Engineer's specifICations Driveway Profiles · Provide vertical profile along the centerline of all driveways · Extend profile limits far enough to determine drainage grade break for driveway. As a minimum provide elevations extending 25' beyond the RW line. · Locate edge of driveways within above limits and provide description of driveway material. · Furnish all driveway profiles in electronic AutoCAD DWG file format per Roadway Engineer's specifications Roadway Survey Provide engineering design survey to locate all above ground and/or at grade: · Utilities, inlets, manholes, pipes, culverts, fire hydrants, valves, meters, baCl<flow preventers. lift stations, vaults, access structures, risers, slabs, sprinklers, etc. · Utility poles, anchor guys, traffic signal poles, traffic control boxes, street lights. etc. · Buildings, columns, walls, fences, gates. signs, mailboxes, bollards, light posts, etc. · Curbs. sidewalks, driveways, guardrail. traffic barrier, traffic signs (incl. type), etc. · All pavement striping. markings and messages (inct. width and color) · Trees (incl, species and canopy and trunk diameter) and hedges · Any other natural or man-made occurrences that may affect the engineer's design locate the above features within 75' on each side of the Basetine of survey of North 2nd Street and within 25' outside of the existing RW lines for the intersecting roads, Design survey information for existing storm drainage and wastewater structures shall include: · Grate or rim elevations and dimensions · Structure wall elevations and din'lensions (where applicable) 20f6 ; Apr-23-C4 04:52pm From--'vLOR ENGINEERING INC '-' 9047319847 T-311 ð ~4/07 F-5Z0 Attachment A Port of Fort Pierce Entrance Road (North 2nd Street) SCOPE OF SERVICES ~ LAND SURVEYING SERVICES ...." Date: 4/23/2004 · Pipe invert, flow channel and/or bottom of structure elevations · Pipe material, size and direction of flow · Locate next upstream and downstream structure Locate and cross-section all drainage ditches/swales intersecting the project alignment and 100' east and west of the existing right-ot-way. Provide location and elevations of all at-grade railroad crossings, induding top of rails, crossing pads and signals. Provide street address of all properties adjacent to project alignment. Provide finished floor and carport/garage elevations for all structures located within 100' of the project baseline. Utility Location Survey · Obtain available as-built record drawing information from all applicable utilities located within or adjacent to the project limits. . Obtain and provide locations marked in the field by Sunshine State One-Call location service. Include all necessary coordination with Sunshine State One-Call for field locations. · If required, include the services of a private Subsurface Utility Location service to provide the horizontal location of existing utilities. · Based on field locations and the as-built information received from existing utility owner's, plot the horizontal location of all above and below ground utilities within 75' of the baseline of survey (including intersecting streets) . Include (as applicable) the size, type, and/or pipe material of the existing utility facilities Survey Deliverables Provide all survey information in electronic AutoCAD DWG file fonnat. · Include Roadway Plan and Profile sheets at 1" = 20' Horiz. and 1";; 2' Vert. scales · Plan views shall include all Jinework to identify all design survey information and baseline of survey, centerline of construction, stationing, RW lines, easements, section lines, government lot lines, bearings, distances, curve data, platllotlparcellines of record of all adjacent properties, plat and/or parcel ownership information of record for all adjacent properties · Profile views shall include existing ground at the Centerline of Construction · Profile views shall include plot of all gravity storm drainage and wastewater structures and pipes located within the limits of the survey · Provide roadway cross sections and driveway profiles at 1" ~ 5' Horiz. and Vert. scales. Include baseline of survey. centerline of construction, RW lines, centerline elevation. stations, offsets and edge of pavement indicators (where applicable). · AutoCAD layers, line types, colors. text, grids and cago point entities shall be closely coordinated with the Engineer's requirements, Provide sìgned and sealed hard copy of all survey deliverables as required by owner and regulatory agencies. 30f6 ~ Apr-23-04 04:52pm From-T~YLOR ENGINEERING INC '--' 9047319847 T-3!1 ~ 05/07 F-5Z0 ...", Attachment A Port of Fort Pierce Entrance Road (North 2nd Street) SCOPE OF SERVICES - LAND SURVEYING SERVICES Date: 4/23/2004 Provide electronic and hard copy of Field Notes as required by owner or regulatory agencies. To accomplish the above scope Taylor Engineering and its subcontractor will perform the following tasks. We have provided the tasK fee amount, labor effort, and time to accomplish each task, 1. Project Management and coordination Task fee amount: $7,632 Time to accomplish: ongoing throughout project 2. Establish HorizontalNertical Control Task fee amount: $11,210 Hours 24 24 40 24 Time to accomplish: 2 weeks after NT? 3, Location survey: Locate property corners, pal/ement, buildings, fences Task fee amount: $21,580 Effort Classification Hours Chief Surveyor 24 Project Surveyor 60 3-man Survey Crew 80 Computer Technician 60 Time to accomplish: 6 weeks after NT? 4. Establish centerline of Right of Way Task fee amount: $7,200 Hours 40 32 o 24 Time to accomplish: 7 weeks after NTP 4of6 Apr-23-C4 04:53pm Frcm-T1VlOR ENGINEERING INC ..... 904 T31 984 T T-311 D 06/0T F-5Z0 ...", Attachment A Port of Fort Pierce Entra"ce Road (North 2nd Street) SCOPE OF SERVICES - LAND SURVEYING SERVICES Date; 4/2312004 5. Stake RJW centerline and 100' stations Task fee amount: $5,340 Hou rs 16 8 16 16 Time to accomplish: 8 weeks after NTP 6. Roadway cross-sections Task fee amount: $6,120 Hours 8 24 40 o Time to accomplish: 9 weeks after NTP 7. Cross-sections intersecting roads Task fee amount: $6,120 Hours 8 24 40 o Time to accomplish: 10 weeks after NTP 8. Driveway profiles Task fee amount: $2,940 Hours 4 16 16 o Time to accomplish: 11 weeks after NTP 50f6 . ARr-23-C4 04:53pm From-T4YLOR ENGINEERING INC 9047319847 .; , ~ .. ~ Attachment A Port of Fort Pierce Entrance Road (North 2nd Street) SCOPE OF SERVICES - LAND SURVEYING SERVICES 9. Utility locations survey Task fee amount: $6.760 Hours 24 o 24 40 Time to accomplish: 12 weeks after NT? 10. Roadway plan and profile Task fee amount: $7,980 Hours 24 20 o 80 Time to accomplish: 14 weeks after NTP 11. Project meetings with city, county. utilities, railroad. FDOT, others Task fee amount: not to exceed $7.374 Time to accomplish: ongoing throughout project Items not included in Scope of Services · RW Acquisition Parcel Sketches · Aerial Survey Targets · Soil Boring locations and Elevations T-311 ~ 07/07 F-5Z0 "wtÎ Date: 4/23/2004 6 of 6 " 'wi AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO.~_ DATE: May 4, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBUC HEARING [] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks & Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh, Director SUBJECT: Request for approval to serve alcohol at Frederick Douglas Park BACKGROUND: Culpepper & Terpening will be holding its annual company picnic at Frederick Douglas Park on May 8, 2004. As part of the event, alcohol will be served and as required by County Ordinance 1-15-23, BOCC approval must acquired. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Culpepper and Terpening's request to serve alcohol during its annual company picnic on May 8, 2004 at Frederick Douglas Park. [X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 COMMISSION ACTION: D Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: Originating Dept: ~ Gonrdio"IiQD/SigD"' lites 1 ~ Mgt & Budget: A -Pt:rl51ic Works: Purchasing" Ot her: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) St Lucie CountY Parks & Recrea~ Department Reservation Request! Facility Use Permit ,/"1 t ~ ---- .- Name of Group (-/V~.;Pêß;':.?e;,£:( Ff /' .e-....qp¿¡- ;l,/,/U~ Date: - ,§ h «' Address 21Øo ~t/7Jr 2/:5'.>44 ~ City: &Reu-Ø Zip: S5~J/ Applicant Name Ð/?'Ye /i3 w¿¿:;~ Phone: #t:: #- - FacilitylPark Requested ß~Pe-..elC£ ~?L-r1S :f)4ÞC 'l. "".2 ~~2~~ .-::>~ ':;:-7 ..:::>:::> 5-8-~ Iuteuded Use Ct?.-u-....~./ ;0'Cd/.-<:2 Alcohol Sale or Consumption? Y ê<; (Complete Alcohol Beverage Permit) I Time: From8;t?Oto /3 roD (include set up & tear down) Date(s) requested No. of People Expected to Attend ~ List any special circumstances, services, and I or materials needed ~ I) The following capacity limits have been established: Imirio School House: 116 Walton Community Center: 130 Maravilla Park: 130 Facilities are intended to be used for recreational activities, not commercial ventures. The Parks and Recreation Department reserves the right to refuse rental for commercia1 ventures, events exceeding capacity limits or those deemed not to be adequately supervised. The Department may require security guard and/or uniformed officers depending on the event, at the renter's expense. A county employee ("Houseman") will be present and will be paid for by the renter. No rental shall last beyond midnight. A penalty of $1 OO/hour will be assessed after midnight, in addition to Houseman fees. 2) General Liability insurance in the amount of $1 Million per occurrence/$lmil1ion in the aggregate is required. Non-profit OTlzanizations (including family grOUps) can arrange for this insurance through the Recreation Department. Insurance rates vary depending on the number of ~ttendees at the event. An insurance certificate must be produced showing St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners as an additional insured. Products are included but not medica1 payments. Consumption of alcoholic beverages requires additional insurance. If selling alcohol, 111 applicable State permits and an alcohol beverage permit must be obtained and submitted to the Parks and Recreation Department. 3) All estimated fees and insurance documentation must be received no later than 2 weeks in advance of the rental. Failure to provide anyone Jfthese will result in cancellation of the rental. Any difference between estimated and actual costs shall be paid at the end of the rental. 25% of rental fees will be retained if cancellation or rescheduling notification is not given at least 2 weeks prior to the rental period. t) Should any visib1e danger be observed by the Permittee or brought to his/her attention by those persons using the facilities under this permit, ¡aid Permittee shall not use the facility and shall report the visible danger to the Recreation Division at 462-1521 between the hours of 8:00 AM to 5:00 Pm Monday through Friday. 5) Please DO NOT go on the fields if they have water on them, or if they are muddy. At no time will anyone alter, damage or deface the Jlaying fields, press box, concession stand, restroom or any part of the facilities under this permit. 5) Possession of permit is required while using facilities or outdoor areas. Failure to supply permit when requested by Director or his designee :nay result in removal from area. 7) Facilities or outdoor areas must be left in clean and adequate condition as determined by Director or his designee. A $100 deposit will be akenthe day of the. rental of any of the Community Centers and returned if th~!~c!!iílis ~e!tÏI!~!~~l1!li~~_c9'_~~~~_~~!1~tio_l1.~Iff!1~_ {eerëãtìòii DivísioIÌ -muSfclëaIiUtnë-area,-tlledeposíiWillbe-keptto-Côvè¡'-t:hècost to clean. Any unused funds will be refunded. 3) The group or individuals to whom a permit is issued shall be liable for any loss, damage, negligence or injury sustained by other person( s) in heir party. ~ :'9) íD. consideration of the oF\.......Jnity afforded the undersigned, agrees to indenmify and hold harmle)......f Lucie County, the Recreation : Department and any employ~f the Sl Lucie Parks and Recreation üepartm.::nt against any and all clmrns by or on behalf of any person or legal entity arising from Applicant's use of premises, the conduct of Applicant's business or from any activity permitted by the Applicant in or about the premises, and will further indemnify and hold harmless the County, its Deparbnents and Employees against perfonnance of any agreements on the Applicant!s part, or arising from any act of negligence of the Applicant, or any of the Applicant part, or arising from any act of negligence of the Applicant, or any of the Applicant's agents, contractors, employees, or licensees, and from and against all costs, attomey's fees, expenses, and liabilities incurred in or about any claim or proceeding brought thereon. I have read and fully understand all roles as regulations as stated above. " J/¿?ye hu/úÞ2!.- PRINT,lJAME I il 10 lL~tL/ CREATION DIVISION APPROVAL ;J.¿ DATE \J FEES AND CHARGES FOR SERVICES: l.Rent (including set up/tear down) 2. Equipment 3. Personnel A) Houseman B) Maintenance C) Private Sec. D) Police/Sheriff 4. Other charges AMOUNT c r:L, 7Úu SUBTOTAL ICC Vi) ~ Jv) ¿HilI j t:lßf'~ò,t Add Sales Tax on applicable items TOTAL . .---" I ~ ,-. 'Î r¡ r,;- k-' 'J) Amount Collected: $ P-IO Receipt # Þ 1,1) J,~t) Deposit Returned: Date Tax Exempt Organization? A TT ACH TAX EXEMPT CERTIFICATE _.~-_.- -~--_. .."._--.~. ---... -.~-- ---. --------..- -.--------. -- .-- --.------ ~- - -- - --- -- ,---.-...-. ~..._-------- --,' -.-.- --- ¡l ii, <',,,:.__'" ;...~ ,~ "" "*'" ~ 'S.J¡~I!(!jr~ COUNTY"L_ F LOR 'I-DA ~ ~ ALCOHOL BEVERAGE PERMIT ST. LUCIE COUNTY PARKS AND RECREATION DEPT. (This fonn is to be used in conjunction with the Facility Use Permit) CcY.L-P~~~ ~~~6l//A:/~ I,~l/¿Ç ÆW¿¿Æ representing request a permit to consume ~6/~r J ~M alcoholic beverages for on-site consumption at r~~Æ1 c:-?t' on ~1(/ ~ ~. ~q?ù7> &,,-e?¿ Criteria for issuance of the permit I. An applicant must be at least 21 years of age. 2. An applicant must possess a valid driver's license or another form of identification containing a current address. 3. Application for permit must be completed and delivered to the Parks and Recreation Departmeñt at least IS days prior to the event. 4. User must present a General Liability Insurance policy certificate for the date of use and a host liquor liability policy certificate each in an amount not less than one million dollars ($1,000,000) when the facility use permit application is submitted. 5. . In the event any user intends to sell alcoholic beverages, they are required to meet all state requirements regarding sale of alcohol and obtain all required permits. Copies of said permits shall be submitted with the . facility use permit. 6. The user must pay the cost of security provided by the St. Lucie County Sheriffs Office. The fee is payable directly to the Parks and Recreation Department at the time of payment for the facility use. Conditions of Permit 1. Person signing the permit must be present during the event. 2. Area of permit use will be confined to the area specified above. User shall be responsible for the behavior of any parties with the user's group. 3. User is responsible to ascertain that no alcoholic beverage shall be served to any person under the age of21. 4. Alcoholic beverages shall be sold/served only in conjunction with food sales. No alcohol will be served during the last 30 minutes of the user's event. 6. The user must abide by all other operational policies and procedures as set forth in the facility use permit. Any violation of any of these rules can result in tennination of the event. 7. User is not to state that St. Lucie County is a sponsor or participant in the event. By signing, I agree to abide by the laws of the State of Florida as they apply to the consumption of alcoholic beverages, any applicable St. Lucie County ordinances and the conditions of this permit as set out above. . M~~'~~~ Signature of Applicant ~-Z-?--CJ$L- Date Recreation Division Signature Date State Permit Received Date Insurance Certificates Received 10102 '( , /1 r ~ .."" ITEM NO. 4a - --"'."~-_..,' - ·."~'i~, ',":', ""_'_-,- "-":"_.-."".~. _""".'.:: " ,., ',' "'-'.~- i.""f",-:",, ...--"'..... , _ .... -:i,.-," AGENDA REQUEST DATE: May 4.2004 REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PR~~ P.M. Bowers Interim Utility Director SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): UTILITIES DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: Staff requests approval for St. Lucie County Utilities for a bid waiver and permission to request quotes for the extension of a force main on North US Highway One to service the North County Utility District with an estimated cost of $1.5 million. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds available from loan proceeds. PREVIOUS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners approved the Bulk Utility Agreement with FPUA and approved the first payment of $163,795 on 4/6/04 and the second payment of $1,320,000 on 4/20/04. Also approved was the interfund loan from the General Emergency Reserves of $2,692,800 for line extensions in the North County Utility District on 2/3/04. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval for St. Lucie County Utilities for a bid waiver and permission to request quotes for the extension of a force main on North US Highway One to service the North County Utility District with an estimated cost of $1.5 million. COMMISSION ACTION: ~PPROVED 0 DENIED o OTHER: Approved 5-0 CE: - º County Attorney: ~/ ~ Review and Approvals o Management and Budget: ~ ff\~ " o Purchasing: /l /1,JJ ~7 ¡ . º Originating Cept: o Other: o Other: º Finance: (Check for copy only, if applicable): Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the St, Lucie County Community Services Manager at 772-462-1777 or TTD 772-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting, l' /..".' "" ~ ..,J -,".."..'.~..'".'.... ......".',..,.. '-'..,'-.'.' ..'..-...".,. .... .,;¡: "f~',,',' : -¡,:;' cO::,*,:-:- , :," ".", .. ;.. " . .. ~.. -, ...... ','- .. .. -,;,;", :.... .. '- . .. ... - ....."""'" :;y1"";·;-.';'·.~,..··.--_· -_'".- -.::.~-'<.. '..e",,"_ _'," ,-.,'- '_,' ,',__ _.". __ ._.,. _.>'" UTILITY DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: P.M. Bowers, Interim Utility Director DATE: May 4,2004 RE: North County Utility District BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County Utilities needs to request quotes for the extension of a force main on North US Highway One. The connection point with FPUA on US Highway One is approximately .6 miles south of Indrio Road. The 16" force main will proceed north to the Feeder Road, then turn west and connect with existing lines at Portofino Shores. Time constraints make this job an emergency as this work must begin in May 2004 and be completed by July 1,2004. All quotes will need to be returned to the St. Lucie County Utility Department no later than 4 P.M. on May 7, 2004. All engineering, surveying, stake out, as-builts, and permitting will be supplied by Masteller & Moler, Inc. Construction plans are being prepared and will be available before construction is initiated. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval for St. Lucie County Utilities for a bid waiver and permission to request quotes for the extension of a force main on North US Highway One to service the North County Utility District with an estimated cost of $1.5 million. ~/' ~ ~ ..",.¡ ITEM NO. 4b - .. ,-".... .. ,"', .-..... .,',....,.1..._.,. ~...,.,.-.',-~_.."-'" ."" . _, ',_ ,." _., _ '_." ,_, _ . '..' ,', .. .. _ .': .. ", .. .r.~ " .. ~', '," .,-- '. '-," , ..:..,; "- --. . . . . . .~.' -.. _...._~:-/':-,..-~..,_...-. -....... ,,-,,-,.. -,.-:"",'.", --" -. ,.....-.. ',,' .:.. -- ,- :-,:.--',. DATE: May 4.2004 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: (X) SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): UTILITIES DEPARTMENT P7~ P.M. Bowers Interim Utility Director TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Staff requests approval of a Work Authorization with Masteller & Moler, Inc. for engineering services for the 16" Water Main and the 16" Force Main Connection at F1. Pierce Utilities related to Route 2 in the amount of $402,400.00. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds available from loan proceeds. PREVIOUS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners approved the Bulk Utility Agreement with FPUA and approved the first payment of $163,795 on 4/6/04 and the second payment of $1,320,000 on 4/20/04. Also approved was the interfund loan from the General Emergency Reserves of $2,692,800 for line extensions in the North County Utility District on 2/3/04. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval for S1. Lucie County Utilities for engineering services for the 16" Water Main and the 16" Force Main Connection at F1. Pierce Utilities related to Route 2 in the amount of $402,400.00. COMMISSION ACTION: .- II APPROVED 0 DENIED o OTHER: A d5 0 pprove - º County Attorney: CJvr ,4'/~ . 4 Review and Approvals ~ o Purchasing: a'P 01 ~,,,.. / ti o Management and Budget: o Originating Dept: º Other: o Other: o Finance: (Check for copy only, if applicable): Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the Sf. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 772-462-1777 or TTD 772-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting, ~. . I '-' ....I ... .... <,.. ,,' ... "F , " .,.' ..". '. .','... , '" . ,;,. . .. .. .. . .- >:-·,f·,·,,o.r-..-.c,-,·.,,.-;-".:···,-.-....·,.."..··'-.-"·.·."c",· "'-.." -<'_." ....--".._.,., .,.,..'_'" .. ..... '-. .... UTILITY DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: P.M. Bowers, Interim Utility Director DATE: May 4, 2004 RE: North County Utility District BACKGROUND: S1. Lucie County Utilities is currently constructing the water and wastewater lines to connect the North County District to the bulk interconnect with Ft. Pierce Utility Authority (FPUA). The total estimated cost for FPUA to extend water and wastewater lines to the interconnect points with St. Lucie County is approximately $3,000,000, (the final cost will not be determined until construction is completed). Per the Bulk Utility Agreement, FPUA's standard policies would apply to the funding of water and force mains needed to serve St. Lucie County. This policy states that the customer (Le., the County) pays for construction of the mains, but also includes an allowance for 60 percent of the construction cost to be credited against future connections. The cost of the mains will include engineering, permitting and construction inspection/administration services, which FPUA is currently providing for the mains on their side of the meter. The agreement also states that, "St. Lucie County shall share equitably with FPUA in the capital costs associated with the extension of new mains or oversizing of mains to the bulk metering points." All of these costs will be spelled out in each Board request as construction proceeds. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval for St. Lucie County Utilities for engineering services for the 16" Water Main and the 16" Force Main Connection at Ft. Pierce Utilities related to Route 2 in the amount of $402,400.00. ~ 4. 4"'- ~ .." Exhibit A Engineering Services Related Route 2 to Provide Route Survey, Base Plans, Engineering, Construction Plans, Permitting, Construction Administration, Periodic Inspection, Construction Stake-Out, and As-Built Surveys for the Extension ofa 16" Water Main and 16" Force Main :lTom Point of Connection to the Ft. Pierce Utility Pipelines Approximately. 6 Miles South ofIndrio Roadon US Highway 1 And Proceeding North on US Highway 1 to the Intersection of the Northbound Turnpike Feeder Road and US 1 and then Proceeding Westerly Along the Turnpike Feeder to the Connection Points for Portofino Shores Along the Turnpike Feeder Road '1. Scope Of Services A. Provide a Route Survey for Engineering Utility Design purposes for the Route 2 Project. The Project will begin on US Highway 1, approximately .6 miles south ofIndrio Road and proceed north along US Highway 1 past Indrio Road and Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute to the intersection of the northbound Turnpike Feeder Road and US Highway 1 and thence, proceed westerly along the Turnpike Feeder Road to the connection points at Portofmo Shores. The estimated length of the Route Survey is 17,200 feet. The Route Survey will include location of all visible improvements within the proposed pipeline corridor and detailed information as needed at the directional bore locations. The pipeline corridor will be on both sides of the Turnpike Feeder Road and the west side of US Highway 1, .:tTom the Turnpike Feeder Road south to Indrio Road, then both sides of US Highway 1 :lTom Indrio Road south to the point of connection to the Ft., Pierce Utility pipelines. Elevations will be based on NGVD 1929 and cross-sections will be obtained as needed. Base Plans will be prepared showing the Route Survey information and for use in preparing the Engineering , Utility Design Construction Plans. B. Prepare Constr:uction Plans and provide Engineering Design services suitable for project pèrrnitting and, construction showing proposed water main and force main pipelines with plug valves, butterfly valves, air relief valves, and directional bores. It is anticipated that both the 16" water main and'16" force main will be constructed with one (1) pipeline located on one side of the Turnpike Feeder Road-and the other pipeline on the other side ofthe Turnpike Feeder Road. It is anticipated that both pipelines will be constructed along the weSt side of US Highway 1 :lTom the Turnpike Feeder Road south to Indrio Road and at some point south of Indrio Road on US Highway 1, the water main will cross to the east side of US Highway 1 and the force main will continue along the west side of US Highway 1 until it passes the proposed re-pump station site and then it will also cross US Highway J to the east side in order that both the water main and the force main can connect to the Fi. Pierce Utility Pipelines, Directional Bores will be located as needed in addition to the directional bores crossing the Turnpike Feeder Road at two (2) locations, and Indrio Road. In addition, directional bores for future water and sewer connections will be made at the proposed Siemens Project entrance road and in the vicinity of the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute entrance road. The estimated length of both the 16" force main and 16" water main will be approximately 18,000 feet, .. ~ , ¡ ~ 'wi Exhibit "A" C. The above-described Route 2 project will require the preparation of an FDEP Pennit Application along with the necessary plans and supporting data for construction of the potable water main and sanitary sewage force main systems. Services include Final Certification to FDEP for operation of the water m,ain and force main systems. In addition, a Utility Permit for construction of both pipelines in US Highway 1 and the Turnpike Feeder Road, and a pennit to diiectional bore pipelines under those FDOT roads must be obtained fÌom FDOT. Our services will include securing the FDOT Permits. Lastly, our office will be responsible for providing all permit application fees associated with the permits which we are securing. D. For the Route 2 Project, we will provide services including assistance to St. Lucie County including construction administration and periodic construction inspection. These services will be on an "As Needed" basis to ensure that the project is constructed in reasonable compliance with the . Construction Plans and permits. It is assumed that construction of the 16" force main project and 16" water main project will be designed and permitted as one (1) project, but' constructed as two (2) separate projects at two (2) different times. If both projects are constructed at the salle time, a reduction in our fee for Paragraph D will be negotiated. It is also assumed that the project will be done on an emergency basis without the need for bidding. E. The Surveying Services covering the Route Survey and preparation of Base Plans will be provided for both pipelines. However, it is assumed that the 16" Force Main Project and 16" Water Main Project will be constructed as two (2) separate projects at two (2) separate times. Therefore, the Surveying Services for Construction Stakeout and As.;Builts will be provided by us based on occurring for each project when it is constructed. In the event, both projects are constructed at the same time, a reduction in fee for Paragraph E will be negotiated. II. Time of Performance A. Surveying services including the Route Survey and preparation of Base Plans and preparation of plans forthe water fI11d force inain systems construction with appurtenances and directional bores for FDEP and FDOT Permit Applications will be completed in a time fÌame estimated at four (4) weeks after our receipt of a signed Work Authorization. III. Method and Amount of Compensation The Engineer, Masteller & Moler, Inc. shall be compensated as follows: A. FORCE MAIN ONLY: 1. Scope of Services; Paragraph A, total lump sum fee of 2. Scope of Services; Paragraphs B and C, total lump sum fee of 3. Scope of Services; Paragraph D, total lump sum fee of 4. Scope of Services; Paràgraph E, total lump sum fee of Total $ 44,00000 $126,1-0000 $ 42,20000 $ 40.00000 $252,30000 .. .. '-- Exhibit "A" A. WATER MAIN ONLY ADDED TO ABOVE FORCE MAIN PLANS: 1. 'Scope of Services; Paragraphs B and C, total lump sum fee of 2. Scope of Services; Paragraph D, total lump sum fee of 3. Scope of Services; Paragraph E, total lump sum fee of Total FiJe#0414B (Exhibit ~rev_042704.doc) -..I. $ 67,900°0 $ 42,200°0 . $ 40,000°° $150,100°° \..f .""", AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 58 DA TE: May 4, 2004 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre SUBJECT: Lot 47, Vikings Landing - Corrective Quit Claim Deed BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Corrective Quit Claim Deed and authorize the Chairman to sign the Quit Claim Deed COMMISSION ACTION: )Cj APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 County Attorney: :Jr.. Review and Approvals M,,,,,gem,,,,, & 'odget 2 ~..~ Purchasing: Originating Dept. County Eng,: Finance: (Check for copy only, if applicable) Eft, 5/96 '-'" ...,¡ INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO.: 04-637 DATE: April 28,2004 SUBJECT: Lot 47, Vikings Landing - Corrective Quit Claim Deed ************************************************************************** BACKGROUND: On December 5, 2000, the Board authorized the Chairman to sign a Quit Claim Deed to cure a title issue pertaining to Lot 47, Vikings Landing in the Spruce Bluff subdivision. Unfortunately, the Quit Claim Deed did not have the correct legal description attached to the Deed. As a result, it is necessary for the County to sign a Corrective Quit Claim Deed with the correct legal description. The background information is more fully explained in a letter dated April 27, 2004 from Frank H. Fee, III, Esquire. RECOMMENDA TION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Corrective Quit Claim Deed and authorize the Chairman to sign the Quit Claim Deed. DSM/caf Attachment '-" FEE, KOBLEGARD & DeROSS ATTORNEYS AT LAW API 2'J aIM r~¡·1 ~i An Affiliarion of Professional Associations COUNTY ATTORNEY 40 I SOUTH INDIAN RIVER DRIVE FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34950 FRANK H. FEE, III R.N. KOBLEGARD, III, _ Board Certified Civil Trial Lawyer SANDRA G. RENNICK of FEE & KOBLEGARD, P.A. FRANK FEE (1913-1983) OTIS R. PARKER, JR. (1910-1982) 1ELEPHONE (561) 461-5020 JOSEPH 1. DeROSS, JR, of JOSEPH J, DeROSS, JR, PA April 27, 2004 TELECOPIER (561) 468-8461 Daniel S. Mcintyre County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 (By Hand Delivery) Re: Lot 47, Vikings Landing Dear Dan: As we discussed, I am enclosing a Corrective Quit Claim Deed for execution on behalf of the County in favor of R. Patrick Beatty, Trustee. I am also enclosing a Corrective Quit Claim Deed to be given by the present owner claiming through Beatty back to the County in order to cure any cloud cast upon the small portion of the above Lot 47 conveyed to the County by Trust for Public Lands. As I indicated this exchange of corrective deeds is necessitated by my failure to attach the correct legal description to the County's earlier deed dated December 5, 2000, recorded in OR Book 1358, page 2608, of the St. Lucie County records. The County's earlier deed should have contained the description found in the County's corrective deed now enclosed. The erroneous legal description earlier found in the County's quit claim deed is as appears on Exhibit "A" to the corrective deed to be given by Ms. Daugherty back to the County. Attorney Bob Gorman is handling a pending transaction for Ms, Daugherty and it is hoped to have the County corrective deed just as soon as it can be executed. Please advise if there is anything further I can do to expedite. FHF/csm enclosures Very truly yours, ~?-/ Frank H. Fee, III cc: Robert J. Gorman, Esquire PREPARED BY/~RN TO: Frank H, Fee, III, Esq, Fee, Koblegard & DeRoss 401 S, Indian River Drive (CHB #25) Ft. Pierce, FL 34950 \wi CORRECTIVE QUIT CLAIM DEED This Corrective Quit Claim Deed executed the day of ,2004, by ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, first party, to second party, R. PATRICK BEATTY, TRUSTEE whose post office address is P. 0 Box 2333, Stuart, Florida 34995-2333 (Wherever used herein the terms ''first party" and "second party" shall include singular and plural, heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, wherever the context so admits or requires. WITNESSETH, That the said first party, for and in consideration of the sum of $10 in hand paid by the said second party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quit-claim unto the said second party forever, all the right. title, interest, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of St. Lucie, State of Florida, to-wit: FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION, SEE EXHIBIT "A" APPENDED HERETO AND INCORPORATED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. This Quit Claim Deed shall serve as a disclaimer of interest in the Exhibit "A" real property encumbered to Grantee by Mortgage recorded in OR Book 643, page 761, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. THIS IS A CORRECTIVE QUIT CLAIM DEED intended to correct an erroneous legal description attached to, and made part of, an earlier quit claim deed given for the same intended purpose of disclaimer of interest by Grantor in favor of Grantee dated December 5, 2000, recorded January 26, 2001 in OR Book 1358, page 2608, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. To Have and To Hold the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. '-' ..., IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Chairman (SEAL) Printed Name: Printed Name: 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE I hereby certify that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared a s Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, who acknowledged before me that he executed the same, that I relied upon the following forms of identification of the above- named person: and that an oath was not taken, of Witness my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this ,2004. day NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Number: My Commission Expires: '-" "WI EXHIBIT nAn For a point of reference, commence at the Southwest comer of Section 15, Township 37 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida; thence nul North 89°57'52" East along the South line of said Section 15, 1,874.73 feet to a point; thence nul North 23°40'01" West a distance of 87.32 feet to a point on the South line of Lot 47, Vikings Lookout Phase I, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded in Plat Book 19, at Page 2, 2A and 2B, as amended in Plat Book 19, at Page 5, 5A and 5B, and as amended by Second Amendment in Plat Book 19, at Page 20, 20A and 20B, all of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, said point being the POINT OF BEGINNING of the hereinafter described parcel; thence continue North 23'40'01 " West, a distance of 41.49 feet to a point on a curve, a radial through said point bearing South 60' 32' 13" East, said curve being concave to the Northwest and having a chord bearing North 9',45'24" East; thence nul Northerly along the arc of said curve having a radius of 50 feet, through a delta of39°24'45" for an arc distance of34.39 feet to a point; thence departing said curve; nul North 86'15'05" East, 468.17 feet to the Westerly right-of-way line of the C-23A, C and SFFCD Canal; thence nul South 28·11'19" East along said right-of-way, 115.19 feet to a point, said point being the intersection of said Westerly right-of-way line with the South line of the aforesaid Lot 47; thence run South 89'57'52" West,along the said South line, 510.64 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING, said lands lying and being situate in St. ' Lucie County, Florida. '-" AGENDA REQUEST """" ITEM NO. G/3,G' DATE: December 5, 2000 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney ~" . . Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney ..- SUBJECT: Lot 47, Vikings Landing (Spruce Bluff) BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS A V AILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA nON: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to sign the Quit Claim Deed attached to the November 2, 2000 letter. COMMISSION ACTION: E: [x] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ouglas Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: r Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. County Surveyor: Prop. Acq. Mgr.: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 \w' ~ INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY I FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 00-1920 DATE: November 29, 2000 SUBJECT: L~t 47, Vikings Landing (Spruce Bluff) ====================~============================================================== BACKGROUND: Several years ago, the county acquired the Spruce Bluff property. The County's acquisition included a relatively small portion of Lot 47, Vikings Landing. At the time the County acquired the Spruce Bluff property, the County obtained and recorded a partial release of the mortgage covering Lot 47. The effect of the partial release is that the County owns its portion of Lot 47 free and clear of the mortgage. Attached to this memorandum is a copy of a letter with enclosures dated November 22,2000 from Frank H. Fee, III, Esquire. As indicated in Mr. Fee's letter, the current holder of the mortgage encumbering Lot 47 (less the County's ownership) has filed suit to . foreclose the mortgage. Unfortunately, the suit names the County as a defendant even though the mortgage does not encumber the County's property. To avoid litigation, Mr. Fee is recommending that the County quit claim its interest in the property currently encumbered by the mortgage. Since the County has never had any interest in the property covered by the Quit Claim Deed, County staff has no objection to Mr. Fee's proposal. \w' RECOMMENDA nON/CONCLUSION: ...,¡ Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to sign the Quit Claim Deed attached to the November 22, 2000, letter. <. " ..- DSM/caf Attachments Respectfully submitted, I DanielS. McInty, e County Attorn \wf "WI FEE, KOBLEGARD & DeROSS ATTORNEYS AT LAW An Affiliation of Professional Associarions 401 SOUTH INDIAN RIVER DRIVE FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34950 FRANK H. FEE, III R.N. KOBLEGARD, III. - Board Certified Civil TriJJJLawyer SANDRA G. RENNÌCK of FEE & KOBLEGARD, PA FRANK FEE (1913-1983) OTIS R. PARKER.JR (1910-1982) TELEPHONE (561) 461-5020 JOSEPHJ.DeROSS,JR of JOSEPH J, D.ROSS, JR, PA November 22, 2000 TELECOPŒR (561) 468-8461 r Daniel S. Mcintyre County Attomey 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: Lot 47, Vikings Landing Dear Dan: Please recall our conversation about Lot 47 of Vikings Landing that remains encumbered to Attorney R. Patrick Beatty by mortgage recorded in OR Book 643, page 761. Beatty has brought a foreclosure of his mortgage naming the County, and I have explained to him as carefully as I know how that the County has no interest in the substantial part of Lot 47 remaining under his mortgage. Recall that at the closing some many months ago, only the portions of Lot 47 as originally platted which are shown on the enclosed sketch colored in pink were conveyed to the County. The pink parcels were partially released from Beatty's mortgage by partial release recorded as one of the closing documents. Consequently, there is no question that the area colored in yellow remains under Beatty's mortgage. In order to get rid of his foreclosure which named the County, I have told Beatty I would try to arrange for a quitclaim from the County. The legal description to be quitclaimed is as attached to the sketch. A proposed form of quitclaim deed is enclosed with this letter. Let me know if you see any problem in obtaining a quitclaim deed so that Beatty can dismiss his foreclosure, Thanks, FHF/csm enclosures Very truly yours, ~6 Frank H. Fee, III ~ ....... \ ...., tJ) o --- ~ --- t:; ~ \0_- --- ('\:)I>~ 'l:: .\ I' ., ~ N .::,._ ...... V'\NQI) O~ç.. ~O-D ----- .~. .. -- & & ~ (I) ~~ ~ " \UN ~~ .~ ( ~ ~ ~ ::t. - I"' 1\ I' " A,/ ß. t1'\ . -c ~ ---:::..~..:/S', ~ ~ ~ ~~. \ ~ ~ '"? ---- \ ~- ~--- ~ ~ C).-\ ........... 't S' ~ ~ \ 1:: \~_. 87~ ~ '- 7:s-: ~~ ~ ¿~ ~ ~ ~ ; ~~~ '\1 . \-·b VI:::; ;,.¡-: ..I~ .. ~ ~ --......... .5'69 'S-7~ .s-¿ ~~ 4...,. ~. ,C;-, .., "'·','1 0"____- ., ., , , 1;'. . I ] Parcels released from mortgage by Partial Release of Mo~tgage recorded in O.R. Book 988, page 752. Part of Lot 47 to be Quit-Claimed from the County to Beatty r:::. ~ § " (':) , .~ U¡ ~ '~ \ Q1\\ r¡~\ ~ ...., ., r Lot 47, Viking. Lookout 'haa. I, accordinq to ~he Plat thereot, a. recorded in 'lat Sook 19, at P&ge ~, JAand 21, a. .-ended in Plat Book 19, at Paqe 5, SA and 5., and a. -.ended by Second ~na..nt i1l Plat Book a, at paqe 20, 20A and 20B, all ot the Public: bcord. ot St. Luc:ie County, Florida, USS AND EXCEPTING THl.UntOH TH:Z l"OLLOWIJIa DESaUUD PARCEL OF L.UfD, .sUCH PARCEL BIING A PORTION or THE SAID, LOT 47, TO-WITI For a point of nference, ~nc. at the louth_.t corner ot Section 15, 'rowft.hLp ~'7 Io\&th, I'&nO.'40 laat, It. L~cLe CO\lntl' rlorLda, t.hana. run Hort.h 19 de9r..., 1'7 .inut..., 12 .econd. z..t alono the outh lina ot ..1d..otlon 15, 1,'74.7J f..t to a pointl thence run North 23 d'eçr.e." 40 minute., 01 ..cond. . w..t a di.tanc:e ot '7.32 t..t to a point on the louth llne otLot 47,Vikinq. Lookout 'M.. I, ac:cordinq to the Plat thereot, a. recorded in Plat Book 19, at 'a98 2,' 2A and ,21, a. ...nded in Plat Book 19, at Page 5, ,SA and 5B, and a. -.ended by aec:ond Aaendaent in, Plat Book 19, at Page 20, 20A and 20B, all of the Public: a.eorda of It. Luci. Co\¡nty, Florida, .aidpoint being the POINT or I.&OIQIJIO of the her.iMft.r' d..cribed p&rc.l, th.nc:. continue Horth 23 degree., 40 a1nut.., 01 MCOnd. w..t, a di.ta"e. of 41.49 f.et to & point on & curve, a' rad1&l through Hid point bearing South 60 degr..., 32 minute., 13 .econd. lut, .aid c:urYe ÞeiDq c:oneay. to the Korth_.t and ~~ving a chord bearing North 9 degree., 45 minut.., ~4 ..cond. £..t, thence run Nor~herly along the &r~ of .aid CUrTe haYiog a radiu. at SO t..t, through a d.ltaot 39 degr..., 24 minute., 45 ~. for an arc di.tanc:. ot 34.39 t..t to a point, thence departing .aid CUrTel run IIorth 86 deqr.... ~S' minut.., OS ..cond. ¡a!!lt, 468.17 feet toth4' we.t.rly right-of-way line of the C-~JA, C and SFrcc Can~l} thence run South 28 degr..., 11 miDut.., 19 -.cond. Eaat along .aid right-ot-~ay, 115.19 teet to a point".aid point beinq the inter..c:tion ot .aid We.terly right-ot-way line with the South line ot the ator..aid Lot 47, th.nc. run South 89 degre..,57 minute., 52 aecond. We.t along the .ald South I1n., 510.64 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. .ald land. lylng and ~1ng .1tuate in St. Luci. County, Florida. '-"' ..., PREPARED BY/RETURN TO: Frank H, Fee, III, Esq, Fee, Koblegard & DeRoss 401-A S, Indian River Drive (CHB #25) Ft. Pierce, FL 34950 QUIT CLAIM DEED This quit claim deed executed the day of ,2000, by ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, first party, to second party, whose post office address is P. 0 Box 2333, Stuart, Florida 34995-2333 R. PATRICK BEATTY, TRUSTEE (Wherever used herein the terms ''first party" and "second party" shall include singular and plural, heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the succeSsors and assigns or corporations, wherever the context so admits or requires. WITNESSETH, That the said first party, for and in consideration oFthe sum of $10 in hand paid by the said second party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quit-claim unto the said second party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the Following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of St. Lucie, State of Florida, to-wit: FOR LEGAL DESCRIPTION, SEE EXHIBIT "A" APPENDED HERETO AND INCORPORA TED HEREIN BY REFERENCE. This Quit Claim Deed shall serve as a disclaimer of interest in the Exhibit "A" real property encumbered to Grantee by Mortgage recorded in OR Book 643, page 761, of the Public Records of St Lucie County, Florida. To Have and To Hold the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST., LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Printed Name: By: Chairman (SEAL) Printed Name: \w- .." STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE I hereby certify that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized to administer oaths and take acknowledgments, personally appeared , a s Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida,known to me to be the person described in and who executed the foregoing instrum,ent, who acknowledged before me that he executed the same/that I relied upon the following forms of identification of the above- named person: and that an oath was not taken, of Witness my hanctandofficial seal in the County and State last aforesaid this ,2000. day NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Number: My Commission Expires: ~ ...., EXHIBIT nAn ,,' Lot 47, Vikiß9. Lookout Pba.e I, accordinq to the 'lat thereof, a. recorded in Plat aook 19, at P&ge 2, lA,&nd 21, a. ...nded 1n Plat Book 19, at pag. 5, 5A and SI, and a. ...ncSed by Second A.end.ent i.'\ Plat Book 19, at Pag. 20,20A and 208, all of the Public aecorda ot St. Lucie County, Florida, U:SS AND EXCEPTING 'r'HZUFROM THZ l'OLLOWUlO DESCRIBD 'MaL or LAHD, SUCH PARCIL BEING A PORTION or TH.I SAID· LOT 47, TO-WI'f. . For a point of nference, coc.Dence at the South_.t corner of Section 15, Town.hip ~7 '~th, ~n9.'40Ia.t, It. LuoL. Co~nty, rlorLda,. thane. run Horth '9 de;r..., 11 ainut.., I: ..conda 1.lt alon9 the *outh lina of .aid '.otion 15, 1,'74.1' t..t to .. pointl thence run North 23 de;r..., 40 .inute., 01 .econd. o We.t a di.tanc:e of '7.32 t_t to a point on the South line of Lot 47, Viking. Lookout Phe.. I, acc:orcUß9 to the Plat thereot, a. r.cC3rded in Plat Book 19, at PaC]e 2,' 2A and .21, .. ...ndad in Plat look 19, at 'ag. 5,5A and 58, and a. ...nded by&econd ~nd.ent in' '1 at look 19, at 'age 20, 20A and 208, allot the Publ1c ~rda ot It. Lucie Co\inty, Florida, .aid point ~inq the POINT or I.ZaIIQCIMa at the hereinafter·d..cribed p&rc.l, thence continue Korth 23 degree., 40 a.1nute., 01 -.cond. Weat, a dhtal'c. of 41.49 teet to a point on a curve, a' radial throuqb nid point bearinq J.ot.¡th 60 de;r..., 32 .inute., 13 .econd. la.t, aaid ~ beiDoq coacaT. to the JIk:Irthve.t and ~"vin9 a chord ~arinq North 9 de;ree., 41 ainut.., 24 ..conda t..t, thence run Northerly a10n9 the ar~ of .aid CUrTa haTiDq a radiu. ot 50 t..t, through a delta of 39 degr..., 24 minute., 45 ..cond. tor an arc diatanc.. of 34.39 t..t to a point 1 thence departing .aid CUrTa 1 rua ~rth 86 de;r.... 15 .inute., 05 .econd. la8t, 468.17 t.et to the Weat.rly right-ot-way line of the C-23A, C .nd srrCD Can¡l, thence run South 28 de;r..., 11 aiaut.., 19 aec:ond. z..t alonq .aid riqht-of-~ay, 115.19 t..t to a point.,..id point being the inter.~ion of ..id We.t.rly right-ot-way line with the Soutb line at the ator...id Lot 471 thence run South 89 degre.., 57 minute., 52 aec:ond. We.t aloAg the .aid South lin., 510.64 t..t to the POINT or BEGINNINC. 'aid land. lyinq and ~lnq aituate in St. Luci.County,rlorida. ., \-t AGENDA REQ~T """ ITEM: # C-7 DATE: MAY 4, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: John Lenfesty Interim Risk Manager SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): SUBJECT: Human Resources/Risk Management Catastrophic Inmate Medical Coverage Insurance BACKGROUND: Rising inmate medical care expenses, over and above routine expenses have precipitated the need for catastrophic medical coverage insurance to defray incurred costs, Incarcerated inmates with severe illnesses (such as kidney disease, heart ailments, trauma, etc,) require in-patient hospital care for extended periods at great cost. One method of controlling inmate medical costs is to provide catastrophic insurance coverage. GENERAL NOTES: Inmate medical care expenses are first covered by Prison Health Services through a contract with the Sheriff's Office, Prison Health Services is responsible for the first $225,000,00 of incurred inmate medical care costs, After the first $225,000,00 cost threshold has been reached, S1. Lucie County BOCC is responsible for shared costs as follows: $0,00 to $225,000,00 Prison Health Services (PHS) 100% responsible $225,000,00 to $400,000,00 PHS & SLC BOCC split responsibility 50% each Over $400,000,00 (+) SLC BOCC 75% responsible, PHS 25% responsible One or two severely injured or ill inmates can account for claims of several hundred thousand each. FUNDS AVAIL.: 001-2300-531300-200 Inmate Medical PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: N/A Staff recommends approval for HR/Risk Management Department to purchase the proposed Catastrophic inmate medical care insurance coverage in the amount of $57,701,00 as a means to reduce and control Inmate medical costs, COMMISSION ACTION: ENCE: IX APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 ~~/" Review and Approvals 6f1 ----- al M, Anderson ty Administrator / ' Purchasing: G.-//",...... County Attorney: Management & Budget: Other: Other: Originating Dept. Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)_ Received: 4/2~/U4 ~:'öAM; ~OU-~~l-ö//O -~ ~I ~UV~C nUIV',,",I" ne;:;;:¡UUNf,.,.;t:.:::t; I""'age £to ~ To: @ 9177246223~~ ......" Pag Data: ,4/29/2004 e: 004- Time: 9:00 AM ......, --...-------.----.----- .. HUNT INSURANCE GROUP, INC. 3606 Maclay Boulevard South· Post Office Box 12909 · Tallahassee, Florida 32317-2909 (850)385-3636 · W A TS (800)763-4868 · FAX (850) 385-2124 CATASTROPHIC INMATE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT QUOTE st. Lucie County 04128/04 1 Year (05/01/04 - 05/01/05) Lexington Insurance Company Inpa~.nt M:::I~~en.. and ~utPati.nt S~ery ~r'.S õ::: ~". r _J ! Name of Insured: Date: Term of Contract: Insurance Carrier: Coverage: · · AI, · All · All cha " · All charg""q · All charges r'ë · Charges which · Charges wh ich are in , · All charges for which govern" · Charges paid outside the terms of the Policy d from custody egally obligated to pay ASSUMPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: · This quote is an estimate based on data provided and subject to a completed application · Eligible claims are those occurring in 12 months and paid In 18 months · Large claim updates may be required · Quotes valid for 30 days and an additional 5% credit can be aODlied for annual Davment · Higher Limits are available (5% additional for $500,000 limits) · This quotation contains general information and is not a contract or binder of insurance '-' '-"" ~ .J-r. 7 I"~ I 4-27-04 Doug, Re: Catastrophic Inmate Medical Attached are quotes from 5-1-03 to 5-1-04 and 5-1-04 to 5-1-05. The main change is the retention (deductible). 03-04 was $25K per inmate; 04-05 is $75K. Est. annual premium for 03-04 was $78,402. For 04-05, estimate is $59,685. The inmate population increased from 895 in 03-04 to 1,168 in 04-05. We went to the Board for this last year (see attached). John Lenfesty X 1404 ('I >! " . &- ,,' ¡, {'?' r _. ( ,{,;/t..J, .,.. ~, .,' ~".' ,F)- / ,(f'YJ' fÞV 04-29-'04 07:09 FROM-SO FINANCE 7724623?75 T-541 P01/02 U-010 ~ '-'" '" * Bunt Inaunuace Group, Inc. ...."HRH' A Bilb. Ropl and. Hobbs Company ~ . , 3606 Macla., IIGIalward Boatlt. TaUalaaøcc, FL 32312 PG.t Omoe lox 12909, TaUa........ FL 33317 T."p!ao..: 18501 3815-3636 ow (BOOI 763-4168 ~...u.u.: l.eoI3"-~124 .......bil-ull..... Pac.ImUe Date: April 28, 2004 M Toby Long .. 0: 61. LuCie County "ax: 1.772-489-5851 He; Inmclte MediClI Coverage Renewal Quotation J'J'oml Pat Ashburn ìPA A1"7)~ / b tfi Pace.: 2 !'bone: Cc: IMPORTANT WAR.NING; This meQagG Is Intended for the us. of the pet'lOn or entity to whom it ía addrellled and ma~ OOnleÎn information thel i. prlvilc~d and confidential. the dl5c1oliUre of which '5 governed by applioable law. If the raaa., of thiG mU1!I1Ig8 is ncllhllllnwnded recipient, or the emplOyee or agent rei9ponaible to defivor it to the intendtsd recipient, you ani hllRlby notified that any dissemination, distribution, or copying of tI1ia ¡!\formation is STRICTLY PROHI8IT~C. If you have nu·,@lvedlhl$faXbyerror. plea.ø notify us immediately and destroy the relsted message, Toby: Attached is a revised renewal quotation for your C.tastrophic Inmate Medical Reimbursement coverage. We had requested Lexington Insurance Co. to consider different SpecifIC Retention amounts. They agreed to Quote a $75,000 Retention. Please review. circle and ínitial the option of choice and return to me via fax at your eartiest convenience, as this policy renews on 05101/04. If you havG any questions, please do not hesitate to contact either Dave Dunbar or myself. I look forw8lrd to hearing from you soon. If you do not rl'""i"" aIj pa¡es. plltlilStr "0Iltc1.ct the send.er at (800 763.4868 or (8501385-3636 immO!clill.tely. i:ì "llt,,¡Æ~r;3'fl. \V7r=., "",,' {/" . '" !~. ' ft~R 29~a~~J CO. ADMIN. OFFICE 04-29-'04 07:09 FROM-SO FINANCE 7724623275 T-541 P02/02 U-010 ..._-'~---~ '-~- *' HUNT INSURANCE GROUP, INC. J60ð Maclay BouJeva:rd South· PI;Ist om..e Box t2909 . TIîI11aha6scc. Floridll 32317·2909 (850)385-3636 · WATS (800)763-4868 · FAX (850) 385-2124 -----.-..-..--....-.-- ~ ~ATI:. MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT QUOTE Name of Insured: D.'.: T.trn of Contract: Insurance Carrier: Coverage: St. Lucie County 04128104 1 Vear (05101104 - 05/01/05) Lexington InBUranc. Comptr'lY Inpatient Medical Expens. and Outpdent Surgery Expen... · · · All · AI d'I · An char · All charges , · Charges wnlch ii~ · ChérQee which are In · All Charges for which govern · Charges paid outside the terms of the Policy AlSUM~nON& AND CONDITIONS: · This quote is an estimate baseo on data provided and subject to a çompleted application · Eligibllil claims ani those oçwrring in 12 months and paid in 18 months · Large claim updele$ may be require<! · Quo'. valid for 30 daYI and an 1 Q It can be a IIecI for annual a · Higher Limits are avsilable (5% IiIdditionel for 600.oo0limlls) · This QuoUUion oontains general information and is nol 8 contract or binder of Insurance ~~:7;~~~]~ CO. ADMIN. OFFICE :ved: 5/9/03 11:32AM; ,-5/9/2003 Timr 11:29 AM /02- ~ 850-521-8775 -> ST LUCIE CO HUMAN RESOURCES; To: wayne @ 9,1-7~62-2361 ~ ~ ...", Page 2 Pag 1r HUNT INSURANCE GROUP, INC. 2324 Centerville Road Post Office BOI 12909 Tallahassee, Florida 32317-2909 (850) 385-3636 WATS 1-800-763-4868 FAX (850) 385-2124 ~f. ~~I CATASTROPHIC INMATE MEDICAL REIMBURSKMENT QUOTE Name of Insured: St. Lucie County FL Effective From: 511103 to 511104 Term of Contract: 1 Year Insurance Carrier: Lexington Insurance Company Coveng" IDpaö.., M,,",oI ."'.... and Oolp.oö.., ¡..ry E<peos" COVERAGE BASIS Option 1 Option 2 Option 3 Total Coverage per Inmate: 5250,000 $250,000 5250,000 Specific Retention Per Inmate: $25,000 535,000 550,000 Maximum Reimbursement Per Inmate: 5225,000 $215,000 5200,000 Current Inmate Population: 895 895 895 Rate per inmate oer dav: .24 .18 .12 I Estimated Annual Premium* 578 402 $58.802 S39201 I I Estimated Monthlv Premium $6534 54900 53267 I The maxinwm eligible expense allowable shall be limited to the lesser of the amount paid, or an "Average Daily Maxinwm"(ADM) per admission of $7500 paid ADM for theflnt three days and $3500 pflid ADM thertllfter. OPTIONAL" BUY BACK COVERAGE: AidslHIV Substance Abuse Pregnancy MentaVNervous Security & Guarding Expense Additional Monthly PreßÙums $1307 5980 5653 5980 5735 $490 $653 $490 5327 $49G 5368 S245 TBD TBD TBD EXCLUSIONS: All charges incurred as a result of AIDS I mv iIInesses*· All charges in connection with treatment of mental or nervous disorders·· All charges in connection with treatment of substance abuse*· AIl charges due to pregnaney ** All eharges in eonnection with security or guarding any inmate for any reason·· All charges related to newborn care Charges which are not inpatient Charges which are incurred after the inmate has been released from eustody All charges for which government authorities are not legally obligated to pay All eharges in connection with treatment within 72 hours of eoverage effective date Charges paid outside the terms of the Policy ASSUMPTIONS and CONDITIONS: This quote is an estimate based on data provided and subject to a completed application Eligible eiaims are those oceurring in 12 montbs and paid in 18 months ' Large claim updates may be reguired Quotes valid until 5/14/03 This quotation eontains general information and is not a eontrad or binder of insuranee An additional 50/0 credit is availabie for annual payment. Received: 4/29/04 8:16AM; . Date': 4/29/2004 T' ~: 9: 00 AM e: 004- ~' 850-521-8775 -> ST LUCIE CO HUMAN RESOURCES; To: @ 9,1772462~ ~ tv .." _....~._._.------_._-_.._..._...-..,....- *' HUNT INSURANCE GROUP, INC. 3606 Maclay Boulevard South· Post Office Box 12909 · Tallahassee, F10rida 32317-2909 (850) 385-3636 · WATS (800) 763-4868 · FAX (850) 385-2124 CATASTROPHIC INMATE MEDICAL REIMBURSEMENT QUOTE Name of Insured: Date: Term of Contract: Insurance Carrier: Coverage: St. Lucie County 04128/04 1 Year (05/01/04 - 05/01/05) Lexington Insurance Com pany Inpatient Medical Expense and Outpatient Surgery Expenses · · Ai" · All · All ch · All charg · All charges · Charges which , · Charges which are in · All charges for which govern · Charges paid outside the terms of the Policy d from custody egally obligated to pay AsSUMPTIONS AND CONDITIONS: · This quote is an estimate based on data provided and subject to a completed application · Eligible claims are those occurring in 12 months and paid In 18 months · Large claim updates may be required · Quotes valid for 30 days and an additional 5% credit can be aCDlied for annual cavment · Higher Limits are available (5% additional for $500,000 limits) · This quotation contains general information and is not a contract or binder of insurance Page 4 Pag - I .._ ~ AGENDA REQ~T .. ITEM: # C-A1 DATE: June 3, 2003 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Wayne Teegardin Risk Manager SUBMITTED BY{DEPT): SUBJECT: Human Resources/Risk Management Catastrophic Inmate Medical Coverage Insurance BACKGROUND: Rising inmate medical care expenses, over and above routine expenses have precipitated the need for catastrophic medical coverage insurance to defray incurred costs, Incarcerated inmates with severe illnesses (such as kidney disease, heart ailments, trauma, etc,) require in-patient hospital care for extended periods at great cost. One method of controlling inmate medical costs is to provide catastrophic insurance coverage, GENERAL NOTES: Inmate medical care expenses are first covered by Prison Health Services through a contract with the Sheriff's Office, Prison Health Services is responsible for the first $225,000,00 of incurred inmate medical care costs, After the first $225,000,00 cost threshold has been reached, St. Lucie County BOCC is responsible for shared costs as follows: $0,00 to $225,000,00 Prison Health Services (PHS) 100% responsible $225,000,00 to $400,000.00 PHS & SLC BOCC split responsibility 50% each Over $400,000,00 (+) SLC BOCC 75% responsible, PHS 25% responsible One or two severely injured or ill inmates can account for claims of several hundred thousand each, FUNDS AVAIL: Funds will be made available in 001-2300-531300-200 Budget Amendment #BA03-152- General Fund PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for HR/Risk Management Department to purchase the proposed Catastrophic inmate medical care insurance coverage in the amount of $74,482,00 as a means to reduce and control Inmate medical costs and budget amendment BA03-152 moving funds from Contingency, COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [ ] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Douglas M, Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicableL