Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 12-19-00 '-' w BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADDlílONS AGENDA DecemÞer 192000 CONSENT AGENDA COUNTY ATTORNEY A.I Resolution No. 00-289 and Resolution No. 00..290 - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolutions, as drafted, amending Administrative Fee for Grants, Special Dependent Districts and Enterprise Funds. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings. individuals testifying during a heañng will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying duñng a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the Sl Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours pñor to the meeting. ~ w _ .~', _,_> / .:;.. ."J~ J ¡' " BOARD OF COUNTYCOMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: December 12,2000 Tape: 1-2 Convened: 9:00 a.m. Adjourned: 11 :15 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward, Cliff Barnes, John D. Bruhn, Paula A. Lewis Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director, Paul Phillips, Airport Director, Pete Keogh, Leisure Services Director, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Bill Blazak, Utilities Director, Jim David, Mosquito Control Director, Beth Ryder, Community Services Director, Anita Neal, County Extension Director, Hank DuFour, Human Resources Director, Marie Goen, Management and Budget Manager, Don Wést, County Engineer, Don Cole, Acquisitions Manager, Roger Shinn, Central Services Manager, Charlie Bicht, Purchasing Manager, Mike Bowers, Road and Bridge Manager, Leo Cordeiro, Solid Waste Manager, Gayla Barwick, Tourism, Sonya Smith, Public Information Officer, Becky Padrick, MSBU Coordinator, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES( 1-032) It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve the minutes of the meeting held December 5, 2000; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMATION/PRESENTATIONS(1-038) A. Resolution No. 00-282- Proclaiming the month of December 2, 000 as "Civil Air Patrol Month" in St. Lucie County, Florida. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 00-282; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. Resolution No. 00-283- Proclaiming December 13,2000 as "Founding Day" in St. Lucie County, Florida, in Honor of "St. Lucie". It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 00-283; ;and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. Ms. Jane Rawley was present to accept the Proclamation. -1- "-" '...rI ",0, .. "..,..' :;:. ..y' 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS(1-120) Ms. Joyce Calvert, a grove owner in St. Lucie County, addressed the Board regarding the Johnston Road MSBU.iII She stated she had concerns and would like to meet with the Commissioners on an individual basis. Mr. Robert Anderson, Indrio resident, addressed the Board regarding the closing of the jetty. The County Administrator advised Mr. Anderson that the reason for this was due to heavy machinery and dangerous materials in the area at that time. 4. CONSENT AGENDA(l-379) It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the Consent Agenda with inclusion of the additions and the deletion of items C-2A and C-6B; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List No. 10. 2. LEISURE SERVICES A. This item was pulled. B. Agreement Approval- The Board approved the Agreement between St. Lucie County and The Treasure coast Umpires Association and authorized the chairman to sign the agreement. C. Florida Coast Professional Baseball School Agreement- The Board approved terminating the existing agreement and approved the new agreement. D. Field Dedication - The Board approved the recommendation of the Ft. Pierce American Little League's request to dedicate Field No.2 to Robert "Coach" Hardman, Sr., in tribute. for his years of commitment to the youth of St. Lucie County. 3. PUBLIC WORKS A. Kings Highway Industrial Park Street Lighting District- Permission to Advertise- the Board approved advertising a public hearing to be held on January 9, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. B. Road and Bridge/Bid Waiver and Purchase from Quotation- The Board approved the purchase ofa 14' flatbed dump truck from Freightliner of South Florida in the amount of $47,426.84. C. Road and Bridge/Bid Waiver and Purchase from Quotation- The Board approved the purchase of a chemical spray truck from Sunrise Ford in the amount of$37,690. D. Road and Bridge/Bid Waiver and Purchase from Quotation- The Board approved the purchase of a trash dump truck with lightning loader arm from Freightliner of South Florida in the amount of$75,789. -2- , 12/08/00 FZABWARR FUND 001 001002 001124 001127 001128 001130 001221 001246 001252 001255 001807 101 10 1002 10 1003 102 102001 105 107 107002 140 140001 140306 160 183 183001 183004 185001 185203 186 186204 304 310002 310003 315 316 362 382 401 418 421 441 451 461 471 491 501 505 505001 510 611 625 '-" ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD WARRANT LIST #10- 02-DEC-2000 TO 08-DEC-2000 ,FUND SUMMARY -.' ;;.. ;1' . . TITLE General Fund FBIP 97/98 Boating Related Activit FTA USC Sectio~5307 FY 99/00 National Endowment Humanities Section 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning FY01 TC Community Action Agency FYOO/Ol 001-DEP-Childrens's Enviro Museum 99/00 Emergency Mgmt. Prep & Assist Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab Grant Fla Fish and Wildlife Conservation Floridian Aquifer Well Monitoring Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Port & Airport Fund Port Fund DOT-New N. Entrance Port Ft. Pierce Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court SHIP Housing Assistance FY 00/01 FHFA-SHIP 98/99 Recycling Operating Fund Recycling & Education Grant FYOO/01 Communication System Fund Impact Fees-Parks Impact Fees-Public Buildings County Building Fund County Capital Sports Complex Improv Fund Environmental Land Capital Fund Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund . North Hutchinson Island Utilities S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund Holiday Pines Utilities Fund Building Code Fund Information Technology Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Service Garage Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Library GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES . 348,119.24 34,431.63 27.25 291.15 35,325.95 2,161.50 34,120.50 585.95 396.44 30.26 90.94 65,828.33 250,000.00 24,844.00 22,517.54 11,751.83 10,956.53 47,029.48 6,658.43 8,330.27 500.00 8,541.00 11,134.02 2,326.42 944.28 819.04 1,307.62 54.09 1,344.75 343.73 3,983.42 42,369.67 53.59 33,500.00 161,354.22 2,500.00 91,122.76 58,834.26 26,082.26 2,515.15 67,618.62 41,427.18 20,180.84 1,402.83 10,690.93 68,917.89 891.42 2,005.54 7,642.78 4,543.54 481. 88 1,578,930.95 ...., PAGE 1 PAYROLL " 281,769.79 0.00 363.67 0.00 5,812.29 796.57 0.00 0.00 1,188.80 0.00 1,188.80 96,798.68 0.00 0.00 42,906.73 3,729.68 2,320.55 83,428.01 0.00 6,002.62 0.00 0.00 2,219.20 4,387.00 1,850.58 2,673.73 2,429.22 0.00 1,789.02 596.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,340.19 21,115.32 189.75 3,442.19 2,057.44 8,269.40 1,711.75 18,932.99 67,341. 07 3,034.75' 1,626.22 9,063.03 3,122.17 0.00 718,497.55 '-" ...., . ' ",,-~. ... ".. E. Okeechobee Road/Delaware Avenue Landscaping- The Board approved a $55,000 contribution to ~h~ City of Ft. Pierce for landscaping and authorized the Chairman to sign the agreement. F. South County Regional Sports Stadium Funding- The Board approved using Public Works Investment for the Future money and General Fund Contingency to be reimbursed by RFP monies to advance revenues in the amount of $255,977.23 to complete the stadium and to declare an emergency and waive the bid process to retain Lawrence Fency and Conceptual Graphics for the perimeter fencing and entrance way sign. Com. Hutchinson questioned if we were going to foUow through with the donatioris and actively solicit them and if this would be brought back to the city council. The Public Works Director stated we would and that he had scheduled a meeting this week with the school board. He believes there is going to be a three way partnership with the State, the School Board and the city of Port St. Lucie along with private parties who wish to donate to the project in order to complete it. G. Indian River Estates/Savannas Ecosystem Management Project- The Board approved Change Order No.1 to extend the grant agreement with the St. Johns River Water Management District for six months and authorized the Chairman to sign the change order. H Solid Waste/Sale of Landfill Methane Gas- The Board approved the negotiations between the Landfill and Tropicana for the sale of landfill methane gas at the Glades Road Landfill approved the December 1, 2000 proposal from Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. for contract negotiations and the development of technical, financial, and business parameters for the agreement for a total lump sum cost of $29,290. 1. Solid Waste/Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc.. Proposal for Annual Permit Compliance- The Board approved the December 4, 2000 proposal for the Glades Road and Golf Course LandfiUs to address Groundwater Testing & Reporting, LandfiU Annual Aerial Survey and Financial Responsibility Update, Video Survey and Evaluation of the LandfiU Leachate CoUection System, and Continuing Consulting Services for a total annual amount of$151,550. 4. PURCHASING A. Bid Waiver and Purchase- The Board approved the bid waiver and purchase of a used motor grader from Equipment Senter in the amount of$128,900. B. Copier Service Agreement- The Board approved the agreement with Max Davis Associates, and authorized the Chairman to sign the agreement. C. Bid Waiver & Sole Source Purchase- The Board approved the bid waiver and sole source purchase from McQuay Service for a replacement coil for the Rock Road Jail Chiller in the amount of$10,595. D. RFP 00-091- Advertising Services for Tourist Development Council- The Board approved rejecting aU proposals received and granted permission to re-advertise the RFP. -3- ~ ..", '..,.;" :.:.. .'1" . . 5. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Quit Claim De&~/St. James DriveIFaith Tabernacle ofFt. Pierce, Inc.- The Board approved signing the Quit Claim Deeds, recorded the Quit-Claim Deeds in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. B. Resolution No. 00-211/Escambia County Housing Finance Authority Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2001- The Board approved adopting Resolution No. 00-211 as drafted. 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Tourism- The Board approved payment of the November invoices to R.J. Gibson in the amount of$5,923.25. Com. Coward stated he would like to see such things as business cards be done in-house these are the monies being discussed for capital projects which we currently do not have the money for. B. Resolution No. 00-1 38/Crimson North Group Limited- This item was pulled for one week until December 19,2000 giving staff the opportunity to meet with the developer. Com. Barnes expressed his concerns with building homes too close to the water and the potential for erosion in the future. He would like to protect those buying the property. He would like for the construction to take place as far west as possible and still make use of the property. Mr. Cuozzo, representing the developer addressed Com. Barnes' concerns. He would be willing to place a condition that they build as far to the east as possible, but, he just does not know what exactly that would mean. The County Attorney suggested this be delayed for one week giving staff and the developer time to work on some language they could both be comfortable with. The developer's representative concurred with this suggestion. C. Final Plat Review- The Board approved the final plat for the subdivision to be known as Parcel 7b at The Reserve (Torrey Pines) and authorized staff to proceed with its final processmg. D. Final Plat Review- The Board approved the final plat for the subdivision to be known as Parcel 32 at the Reserve (Spyglass) and authorized staff to proceed with its final processmg. E. Final Plat Review- The Board approved the final plat for the subdivision to be known as Mainstreet Village at the Reserve, and authorized staff to proceed with its final processing. 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES Grant Acceptance- The Board approved accepting the Drug Control and System Improvement (Edward Byrne) Grant for FY 00/01 and authorized the Chairman to sign all documents necessary for the grant. 7. HUMAN RESOURCES -4- ~ """'" ....,,-.¡..... -.,' .., Central Services/SåÍary Adjustment/Rock Road Facility- The Board approved the salary adjustment of $1.00 per hour for full timé employees at the Rock Road Jail Facility. ADDITIONS I ¡' A.l Agriculture Mileage Reimbursement- The Board approved to continue paying mileage to Agricultural Agents at the existing rates through December while new procedures are being developed. Staff will be reporting on the new procedures at the December 19, 2000 Board meeting. REGULAR MEETING 5. PUBLIC WORKS(1-1233) Consider staff recommendation to adopt the following Resolutions, stating the County's intent to use the uniform method of collecting non-ad valorem special assessments which may be levied by the corresponding municipal service benefits units. A. Resolution No. 00-237/Johnston Road MSBU- It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 00-237; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. Resolution No. 00-238/Cory Campbell MSBU- It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 00-238; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. C. Resolution No. 00-239/King Orange 2 MSBU- It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 00-239; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. D. Resolution No. 00-240/Skylark 2 MSBU- It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 00-240; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. E. Resolution No. 00-241/Sunrise Park Unit One MSBU- It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 00-241; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. F. Resolution No. 00-242/San Lucie Plaza MSBU- It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 00-242; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. G. Resolution No. 00-243/S1. Lucie Village MSBU- It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 00-243; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. Ms. Amy Wright, Rouse Road resident, addressed the Board regarding this MSBU and asked if all of S1. Lucie Village would be affected. The MSBU Coordinator advised Ms. Wright that basically that at this time it is at a preliminary stage and they technically used Indrio Road as the North boundary and the South boundary would be just north of the north bridge. Information will be sent out to the property owners in the near future after the scheduled meeting with the Mayor of St. Lucie Village has taken place. -5- '-' -....I .' . . '.'" .. ..,," Mr. Robert Anderson, resident, addressed the Board regarding the fact that St Lucie Village is not Indrio, it stops at Rouse Road. His property is lòcated east of US I and south of Indrio Road he would like a copy of what is available so he may inform his neighbors. ~. Com. Coward questioned the beginning of the þrocess. The MSBU Coordinator addressed Com. Coward's question. She also advised the Board that there are some areas in S1. Lucie Village which are pockets that are within the unincorporated area of the county. This would need to be ajoint partnership with the Village and the county, this was initiated on behalf of S1. Lucie Village. All correspondence peliaining to this project will be mailed to everyone within the district. Mr. Anderson questioned the way this project was presented in the newspaper and the mapping of the project boundaries. There are residents ofIndrio Road who do not know what is going on at this time. H. Resolution No. 00-244/West 151 Street MSBU- It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve Resolution No. 00-244; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. Resolution No. 00-245/Grey Twig Lane MSBU- It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 00-245; and, upon roll call, motion carriéd unanimously. 1. Resolution No. 00-246/Revels Lane I MSBU- It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 00-246; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. K. Resolution No. 00-247/Revels Lane 2 MSBU- It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve Resolution No. 00-247; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. L. Resolution No. 00-248/Airport Industrial Park MSBU- It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 00-248; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. M. Resolution No. 00-249/Smallwood MSBU- It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve Resolution No. 00-249; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 6. LEISURE SERVICES(I-2286) A. South County Regional Stadium Sponsorship Agreement/The Country Store Sub Shop/Budget Resolution No. 00-278; Consider staff recommendation to accept the first year $250 Corporate Sponsorship Installment, approve the budget resolution and authorize the Chairman to sign the letter of appreciation. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. South County Regional Stadium Sponsorship Agreement/State Farm Insurance/Budget Resolution No. 00-279- Consider staff recommendation to accept the first year $250 Corporate Sponsorship Installment from State Farm Insurance Agents, Larry Lee, Jr., Bill Knight, Mike Rice, Terry Mosley, Phil White, and Scott Price, approve the budget resolution and authorize the Chairman to sign the letters of appreciation. -6- '-" ...., '-·-"f.-·:::';¡' ..'Y" r. It was moved by Com. Cow~rd, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 7. PURCHASING (1-2393) 11&' Proposed Policy Changes to Increase County Efficiencies- Staff requested direction on five (5) proposed changes to BOCC Policy. A resolution will be presented to the Board to place any of the proposed changes into effect. The Purchasing Manager reviewed the threshold for bids. Com. Coward addressed the on-line service and expressed his concerns with the local businesses not being made aware of the quotation participation request. He requested that other interested parties be notified that may not be in our data base so they can be included in the process as well. Com. Bruhn questioned how the Board would know what staff is doing if the Board does not review the 20% in quotations. The Purchasing Manager stated the County Administrator does the approvals at the present threshold of $1 0,000 and the present request is to increase the threshold of approval by the Administrator. Com. Coward commented on the monies allocated in the budget and the changes which can be approved by the County Administrator. The County Administrator advised the Board of the fact that the budget is done many months in advance and if a department needs to change the request of a piece of equipment that was budgeted they are asking for the authority to approve these requests provided they are within the budgeted amount. He will be providing the Board with monthly reports tracking the money as well as providing the information to the office of Management and Budget and the Finance Department. Com. Bruhn stated he did not want to see the threshold grow even higher next year and he does not mind reviewing small bids. He stated that when a policy change is made, it should be for a good reason. The County Administrator advised the Board of the overwhelming situations departments are running into with the heavy workloads. The Utilities Director advised the Board of a present situation with a pump station which is needed, and how this change would expedite the documents and the project. He stated this provides the ability to deal locally much easier for all. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward to approve changes 1-4 as proposed; to include quarterly updates; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Bruhn, Aye's: Lewis, Coward, Barnes, Hutchinson; motion carried by a vote of 4 to 1. Com. Hutchinson stated this was the part she was most uncomfortable with and gave the example of the lap tops. The County Administrator stated he would come around to all the Commissioners if there is an item other than what was budgeted before he signs the approval. -7- '-'< ...., .". -.... ..~< :.:. ~,.' . , It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Coward to approve option one on item 5 of the proposed changes; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Bruhn, Aye's: Lewis, Coward, Barnes, Hutchinson; and, upon roll call, motion carried by a vote of 4 to 1. 1\&' 8. COUNTY A TTORNEY(2-0266) Indian River Estates Stormwater Retention Project/Bow lick Parcel- Consider staff recommendation to approve the Contract for Sale and Purchase, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct staff to close the transaction and record the document in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, 'seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 9. PUBLIC WORKS(2-0323) C & S F "Restudy" Project/Recommendation from the St. Lucie County Restudy Committee- Public Works staff concurs with the recommendations put forth by the County Restudy Committee and requests Board direction concerning development of a formal resolution to support the Indian River Lagoon Feasibility Study. Com. Barnes advised the Board he had to leave for an appointment, however he did wish to stàte his position on this item. He stated the read the committee's recommendations which he was aware they spent many hours compiling. He stated he agreed with the recommendation and he wanted to add that he hoped there would be some way to include urban storm water however, he is aware that these are so far west that it might be impossible. Com. Hutchinson advised the Board that there is a meeting scheduled with Martin County tomorrow and the re-study group wanted to know if the Board was going to acknowledge their recommendation and get back to them. They are also looking for guidance as to where they are to go from this point. Com. Lewis stated she agreed with the recommendation however, would prefer to hold off for a while incase there are changes made down the road. Com. Coward concurred and stated that they do not have all the answers to lock the ,county into specific positions. There are some items especially concerning the connector canal and some of the committee members were asking for additional information. Martin County has not had the opportunity to voice their opinion. Com. Bruhn stated he had questions on the location of the cells. It was the consensus of the Board to ask the committee to remain a part of this project and staff was directed to draft a resolution dealing specifically with the Indian River Lagoon feasibility study dealing with the general issues as discussed. C-7b- Request for authorization to submit a grant application on behalf of the St. Lucie County's Sheriff s office- Staff recommends the BCC approve the submission of the grant package, and authorize the Chairman to sign the application. The Sheriff-Elect wishes to apply for this grant. -8- '-' ..",¡ .., >~' :,;.. ,",' Com. Hutchinson requested in writing from the present administration that they are agreeable with this request. It was moved by Com. "Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1 O. ADMINISTRA nON (2-2022) A. Advisory Boards and Committees- Consider staff recommendation to ratify the following appointments: Com. Bruhn- Fran Ross- re-appoint to the Code Enforcement Board Jeanne Hearn - re-appoint to the FT. Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee Jeffrey Garland- re-appoint to the Restudy Coordination Committee Lee Wheeler- Contractor's Certification Luz Baez, Housing Finance Committee Beverly Rushin, Investment Committee Ken Hogan, Citizens Budget Committee Com. Hutchinson- Marshall "Buck" Miller- re-appoint to the Citizen's Budget Comm. Larry Jennings - re-appoint to Recreation Advisory Board Com. Barnes - Glen Raines to the Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council Bob Bangert - Board of Adjustment Dolores Hogan Johnson- FP Harbor Advisory Committee Horace Hunter - Housing Finance Authority Kristen Metzger- Library Advisory Board Ramon Trias- Planning & Zoning Commission Bill Theiss- Restudy Coordination Committee Sam Comer - Vegetation Protection Committee It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Lewis to approve the stated appointments made by Commissioner's Bruhn, Barnes, and Hutchinson; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. Other Appointments: At Large Appointments: Treasure Coast Health Council, Inc., (Health Ins., Purchaser) Library Advisory Board Tourist Development Council The County Administrator advised the Board the above At- Large Appointments would be pulled and brought back in January. B. Bi- Weekly Committee Reports- The Board members gave updates on the various committees and advisory boards that they serve on. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. -9- Clerk of Circuit Court ill ~ -~ -. .,.".~' ;,;..' /,' ...., Chairman -10- , ..... ...., DECEMBER 19,2000 7:00 PM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA lTEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will 'discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBUC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 AM., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 AM. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA lTEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBUC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 AM., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-' .....,¡ www.stlucieco.gov John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA December 19, 2000 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF AlLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held December 12,2000. f\1?píO{¿J 2. PROCLAMA TION/PRESENT A TION 3. A. Resolution No. 00-286 - Proclaiming the week of December 19, 2000 through December 26, 2000 as "Audubon Bird Count Week" in St. Lucie County, Florida. f+RJro ~ct B. Agriculture / Christmas Remembrance - Sue Munyan and the 4H Group \VJ.ll be here to present gifts to the Board of County COmmiSSiOners.-no~ C. Jerome Rhyant of the Love Center Regeneration Ministries, Inc. will address the Board to request fungjp~·.I. rJJ/'¡I0-¡¡/J/~a- w/'M. IlliiJ M~~ r () ~ ' ~ GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT ~/6ffr- (; ¿t/fu! ÍtArf ~~ t a CONSENT AGENDA /J¡¡JfJ7Ncj Mtl1 add{ 12 tfYV ß ý() It&/7 t1CJh!yI2f-. 4. PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC WORKS SA. Resolution No. 00-004 / South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration Special Assessment District - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution stating the County's intent to use the uniform method of collecting non-ad valorem special assessments for the South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration Special Assessment District. Aw'~ 5 /0 NOTICE' All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any p'erson who decides to app.eal any action taken bY' the Board at tfiese meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpos~ may n~eÇi to ensur~fyt~at a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the reç¡uest of any party to the proceedlpgs. mdlvlduals te.stl mg durin a hearing will be sworn in. Ãny party to the proceedmg~ wIll b~ gr.a)1ted th~ 9Pportul1lty to cross-exam me any indivfðual testi!ying during a hearing upon request. Any'one wIth a dlsablhty. re!= umng, accommodatIon to attend thIs meeting should contact the S~. Lucie County.Community Services Manager at (561) 462:-¡777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least fon:y-eight(48) hours prIor to the meetmg. '-' ....., REGULAR AGENDA DECEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED) PUBLIC WORKS (CONTINUED) SB. Resolution No. 00-28S / Briargate MSBU / 2nd Public Hearing - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the Briargate MSBU, approve the preliminary assessment roll, and authorize the County Engineer to proceed with const~uction ?f the project. frP()~' 6-0 sc. Resolution No. 00-284 / Rouse Road MSBU / 2nd Public Hearing - Consider staff recommendation to consider the comments of the property owners before adopting the resolution to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the Rouse Road MSBU approving the assessment roll, and to authorize the County Engineer to proceed with construction of th~ project. Aw-'~ 6-0 SD. Resolution No. 00-27S / South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration MSBU - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution stating the County's intent to use the uniform method of collecting non-ad valorem special assessments for the South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration MSBU. FrPprÒ'J~ ~ End of Public Hearings 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Resolution No. 00-2S7 / Resolution No. 00-2S8 - Consider staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 00-2S7 repealing Resolution No. 73-137 as amended and abolishing the Board of Governors, and adopt Resolution No. 00-2S8 creating the Technyogy Committee and providing for duties and functions of the cOmmittet Appmwd Lf -I) 8rUMî B. Pursuit Boats (S2 Yachts) Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. f+rpfò~ '-' ....,; REGULAR AGENDA DECEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE THREE 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY (CONTINUED) C. Mirabella Yachts Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement. /J. n1 -11 tlPP' v tlL((,--!' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 7. , u:- Resolution No. 00-139/ Ouasi- Tudicial / Crimson NUl tll Group Limited - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting Major Site Plan and Preliminary Plat Approval for the 10-10t residential subdivision project to be known as Anacostia SID. Location: East side of South SR AlA, approximately 1,300 feet south of the entrance of Frederi.ck Douglas Park. This item has. be~n, e¿ agendaed (yom December 12, 2000. ,f) 11  (}ý: J . fìr\ b L/. ~~ -.=1' í7 ,-. ~. ' fQtXiÁ- 1'" () I «LifY) - ~ IU WI..UUl9f ftCd> C;r ~ {"J lPflJVLR{2J. U ADMINISTRATION 8. .,- Commissioner Hutchinson would like to discuss alternating trips to Tallahassee during the Legislative session'7an 2:3 ~ ~,-feb- 6MJl (fnv1J, 1Jµ¡oU1~ b'~ 6cdV el)~ f:oncGi CóYM>. /JfLiiff- ~ ub, /Jd-v ~ MícJwfß'-<- '-' "'-" CONSENT AGENDA December 19. 2000 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 11 2. PUBLIC WORKS A. River Park Water Quality Improvement Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Engineering Work Authorization for BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. to design baffle boxes to improve the quality of stormwater runoff discharging from the River Park subdivision in the amount of $26,270.40, approve the project budget, and authorize the Chairman to execute the contract. B. King Orange 2 MSBU and Skylark 2 MSBU - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Interlocal Agreements with Fort Piérce Utilities Authority and the City of Fort Pierce to provide potable water to King Orange Drive and Skylark Drive, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreements. C. King Orange 2 MSBU and Skylark 2 MSBU - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Interlocal Agreements with the Property Appraiser and Tax Collector, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreements. D. Road & Bridge / Sod Contracts - Consider staff recommendation to approve the contract amendments as prepared by the County Attorney with Jose A. Gonzales d.b.a. T&J Sod Transport & Installation, Nature's Keeper, Inc., and Tri-Brother's Tree & Landscaping, Inc., to increase the contract from $9,999 to $2 S,OOO for each sod installation contract, and authorize the Chairman to sign the amendments. E. Work Authorization No.9 / Orange Avenue over Header Canal Bridge Replacement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the work authorization with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for engineering services to provide requested revisions in the amount of $10,800, and authorize the Chairman to sign the authorization. F. Work Authorization No. 10/ S3rd Street Bridge over Canal C-2S - Consider staff recommendation to approve the work authorization for the scope and fee proposal submitted by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for engineering services to provide plans and specifications in the amount of $13,800 and authorize the Chairman to sign the authorization. G. Road & Bridge / Equipment Purchase - Consider staff recommendation to approve Equipment Request No. EQOl-223 for the purchase of a Raised Pavement Marker (RPM) Applicator from S.T.£. Inc., in the amount of $3,79 S, for use in the Traffic Operations Section. '-" .""" CONSENT AGENDA DECEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE TWO 3. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Permission to Advertise / Petition to Abandon / Dixieland SID Unrecorded Plat - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise a Public Hearing to be held on January 16, 2001 at 9:00 am, or as soon thereafter as possible. B. Revocable License Agreement / Cherokee Street - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Revocable License Agreement, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and instruct Ranger Construction Industries, Inc. to record the Agreement in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. C. Agreement Extension - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Second Extension Agreement with R&R Corporate Systems, Inc. for Janitorial Services, and authorize the Chairman to sign the extension. D. Resolution No. 00-288/ Rouse Road MSBU - Hendren Right-of-Way parcel- Consider staff recommendation to accept the Hendren Deed, authorize the Chairman to execute Resolution No. 00-288, and direct staff to record the documents in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 4. PURCHASING A. Bid Waiver and Sole Source Purchase - Consider staff recommendation to approve the request for a bid waiver and sole source purchase to RAD Data Communications for a Optimux-XLTI Multiplexer in the amount of $13,800. B. Bid No. 00-084 - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for the purchase of two integrated tool carrier loaders to the low bidder, Coastline Equipment Co. in the amount of $197,720. S. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. MPO's Transit Development Plan Consultant Services Contract - Consider staff recommendation to approve the request to advertise the Request for Proposals for the Transit Development Plan. B. Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise an RFP for the FFY 2001 Community Development Grant applications for Grant Planning and Writing and/or Grant Administration in the Economic Development category. C. AAA Cooper Replat - Consider staff recommendation to approve the final plat for the subdivision to be known as AAA Cooper - Replat, and authorize staff to proceed with its final processing. , '-' .....,; CONSENT AGENDA DECEMBER 19,2000 PAGE THREE S. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (CONTINUED) D. Oleander Pines Replat - Consider staff recommendation to approve the final plat for the subdivision to be know as Oleander Pines - Replat, and authorize staff to proceed with its final processing. E. Yorkridge Plat - Consider staff recommendation to approve the final plat for the subdivision to be known as Yorkridge Plat, and authorize staff to proceed with its final processing. 6. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE A. Bid Waiver and Award from Quotations - Consider staff recommendation to approve the bid waiver, and award from quotations to Ramey Rug Carpet One in the amount of $16,287.31 for replacement carpet for the Mets Locker Room & Office/Weight Room, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. B. Bid No. 01-004/ South 2 Sth Street Bridge over Ten-Mile Creek Bridge Repair- Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the second lowest bidder, CEM Enterprise, Inc. in the amount of $97,302, establish the project budget, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. C. Change Order NO.1 / Orange Avenue at C-24 Bridge Replacement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the change order in the deductive amount of (-$40,S18.02) resulting in a total contract amount of $1,038,406.98, accept the project, release retainage in the amount of $107,892.S0, and make final payment to Johnson-Davis, Inc. in the amount of $67,179.48. D. Keen Road Bridge Replacement Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the award of an additional $lS,OOO for geotechnical engineering testing services and construction management services to Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing to complete the project. 7. LEISURE SERVICES Ilous Ellis Memorial Park (Open Space) Baseball Lighting - Consider staff recommendation to piggy-back off of the City of Jacksonville's Contract No. SC- 0463-00 with Musco Lighting for the needed improvements, and authorize the Chairwoman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. 8. AGRICULTURE Mileage Reimbursement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the establishment of a set mileage reimbursement for the Extension Director at $300/month, and Agents, the Horticulture Specialist and one Program Assistant at $22S/month, to be paid on a monthly basis effective January 1, 2001. / ~ ...",¡ CONSENT AGENDA DECEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE FOUR 9. ADMINISTRATION Committee Appointments - Consider staff recommendation to ratify Commissioner Bruhn's appointments of Russell Aikens to serve on the Planning & ~oning Commission, and Stix Nixon to serve on the Board of Adjustment. 12/15/200e 18:47 5514\..,-985 USDA:ARS:URHr FT PI """ PAGE 01 ;:- r' , USDA I ARS US llORTICULTURAL RESEARCH LABORATORY 2001 SOUTH ROCK llOAD . ~ ; ::.~ -f?~e- ~ n \\ rl ¡-;-:-, -,- FORT PIERCE FL34945 il )1 ~ ~ ~ u 0 lS I , II~~: :1 NOTE: Nefv AfltIrt!.SS, T~/4!pltqttf! and FllC$l"ú(e NunWen eJIæti)1~ 11 ?ftUMJ9(¡ EC 1 8 2000 ! ¡ U I. ! t I \ .......................................................~....* . .' L FAX TRANSMISSION \ i , ....................*.....**................................. }:tLEASE DELiVER lMMEDlATEL Y TO: '7l YA-vL ~ L ~ -...ÞoJ ì. c:;.. '. Fax No. Phone No. t~ FROM: M \ c.. ~l, .....G--C- R v.1.- v <ð ~ Q..r DATE: \2.. -\5'-'2.000 NumbefofPues(mc1udinarovers!1eet): ~/ . COMMENTS; .:í ;.A ICIr- ~ tc. ...c:.- á S' /2 ., ~- ~, C I - ..., --. \,,\.,..:.;> ~ ~ <:. c;:;.. . ~~~- ~~ '.. tMé~G~ .' ~ Please call 561-462-5300 if you have a problem receiving t1üs tranSmission. Our fax number 561-462..5986 r ~2/15!20Ø0 18:47 5514\..,.385 USDA: ARS: URf :FT PI -...."I PAGE 02 .c: "Ii , Q . R\ ' S1". Lucie CountY Board of County Commissioners APplication for Servir\Q 01'\ County àoards and Committees fhanK you for applying for a position on one of St. Lucie County's mony advisory boards and committees. Th~ minimum requirements for committee. membership are.: . ---Must be (t County resident "'Must not be related to another commìttee. me.tnbet'# County Commissioner or County emploýee involved with the committee of inte.('e.st *Must not be employed by the. same busines~ entity as other committee members. *Must not serve on more than 2 County committees , Note: Some committees have additional requirements, please inquire when submitting this oppHcQtion. In addition, servic~ on committees with planning. zoning or natural re.sourc~ responsibil!ties may require disdosure Qf financial interests. please complete the following information: . 1. PLEASE INDICATE n-tE COMMrrrEE(S) YOU ARE INTERESTED IN, SEE THE REVERSE SIDE '2. NAME~ MICHAEL G. BAUSHER PHONE; H 561-595-5854 W t;f11-462-5918 3. HOME ADDRESS;801 S. Ocean Drive. Apt: ~n~ Fort Pi~~~e, Florida 34945 10. WHICH COMMISSION DISTRICT DO YOU LIVE IN? Cliff Barnes' BUSINESS/OCCUPATION Scient:ist BUSINESS ADDRESS: 2001 South 1toc1& Ro",d. ,"art: Pie:t"~e.. Florida ~4()(d PHONE; BRIEF RESUME OF EDVCA nON &. EXPERIENCE:(p'e,a.$e atf.:tch resume) Education- B.S. thru Ph.D. in Plant Phvsiolo¡y ~~~ ~in~npm;n.~~y (Minor in 'FIusincu: O; lOt" t'h~ "Q ~. 'lß'rel) Orang:e c~ty Florid!! F.nv"rnnm.ø.,.,t-~1 'ga·d·'<3 ~"'ard (Ç; y"""r~) Wint.er Park, 'florid.a Eu;rlronmental ard DO yoU CU~RENn.Y SERVE ON A COUNTY COMMITTEE(S). IF SO, PLEASE LIST~ None WHY DO YOU THINK YOU ARE QUALIfIED TO SERVE ON THE COMMITTEE(S) INDICA TEC? tntp-t'~~t::i~ r..........".,.,i P'y T\.....,."', "'P ..",A i:"çodJ "<!S'iI of .'a.vkoÐmqt;l~al Q'BJi bus1ne$s ~S6ues. -. WOULD YOU CONSIDER SERVING ON ANOTHER BOARD OTHER THAN THE ONE(S) SíATED ABOVE?(PLEASE SPECIFY) (~i.~"'ol ~"C::' .Cv.,....j.. ) COMMENTS:_ 4. 5. 6. 7. ~= == 8. 9. it. = SrGNA TURf: J k O.tµ ~ t>A TE' 17 -12:- .., """'" . APPLIC ON WILL REMAIN EFfEcnVE FOR ONE YEAR Submit' to:5t. Lucie County Administra.tQr's Office 2300 Virginia Ave.. Ft. Piel"ce., Fl. 34982 Phone: 462-H5(o , 12/15/201313 18:47 55145,-,,85 USDA: ARS: UR' :FT PI ...., PAGE 133 ST. LUCIE c.OUNTY ADVISORY BOARDS AND C.OMMITTEE CITIZEN APPOINTMENTS AVAiLABLE Please check the committees you are intere.sted in: Q"" Beach Preservation Task Force o Board of Adjustment o Central Florida Fore.ign- Trade Zone, Inc. a Children's Services Council a Citizen t s Budget Development Committee ~ Code Enforcement Board CJ Community Development Block Grant Citizen's Advisory Task Force CJ Contractor's Certificatlon Board o Cu\turat Affairs Council o Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council CJ Environmental Hearing Board (J FI. Dept. of Chi!dren and Family Services Committee Dist,..kt 15 o FI. Dept. of Children Ql'\d Family Services Nominating Qualifications Review Committee District 15 ... Fort Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee o Historical Commission a Housing Finance Authority Q rnvestm~nt CommitTee fK" Library Advisory Board o PI<Jnnìng & Zoning Commission/Local Planning Age.ncy a Restudy Coordination Committee o St. Lucie County Recreation Advisory Board a Tourist Development Council CJ Treasure Coast Health Council, Inc. CJ Treasure Coast Regional Economic Distríct/Overal1 Economic De.veloþment Progrol11 Committe-e CJ Vegetation Protection Committee 12/15/2000 18:47 56145'-"36 USDA: ARS: URHr Ç"T PI "wi PAGE 04 I. Name: Michael G. Bausher Address: 801 South Ocean Drrive #608 Fort Pierce, Florida 34949 Tel (H) 561-595-5854 (W) 561-462-5918 Title: Research Plant Physiologist Edu~tional History 1964-67 Delaware Valley College, Doylestown, PA, n1ajor - Horticulture, minor- Chemistry, Business. B.S. 1967. 1961-69 Rutgers University, New BrunS'h1Ck, NJ, major - Horticulture, minor- Plant Pathology Ñ1.S. 1969. 1969-74 University of Florida, Gainesville, PL, major - Plant Physiology/BiochemisUy. Ph.D. 1974. Post-eraduate Emplovment 1974-75 Postdoctoral Research Associate, Horticulture Department, University of F1orida. 1975- Jan 2000 Research Plant Physiologist, USDA, ARS, Orlando, FL. Jan 2000 to Present - Research Plant Physiologist, USDA, ARS, Orlando, FL. Currently in the Horticultural and Breeding Research Unit. Editorial Bðards and Advisorv ApDointments Grant reviewer for NSF. and the Small Business Initiative. Honors and Awards (since 1990} 1992 Summer Intern Award, USDA-ARS. 1993 Florida Citrus Production Research Advisory Council Grant A ward - New blight specific proteins: Can they be used as a key to a causal agent? 1996 Research Associate A ward, USDA - Isolation of cDNAs for specific citrus blight proteins. Florida Citms Production Research Advisory Council Grant Award - , Development of a rapid method to determine the decline-inducing potentiå.l of CTV. Florida Citrus Production Research Advisory Council Grant Award- Development of a rapid method to determine the decliÌle-inducing potential of CTV ~ ¿ ~; :~; . 1, 1 . i '-" ....., _ "..~' :,;,. .'1 ~ ill BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: December 12, 2000 Tape: 1-2 Convened: 9:00 a.m. Adjourned: 11:15 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward, Cliff Barnes, John D. Bruhn, Paula A. Lewis Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Ass1. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director, Paul Phillips, Airport Director, Pete Keogh, Leisure Services Director, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Bill Blazak, Utilities Director, Jim David, Mosquito Control Director, Beth Ryder, Community Services Director, Anita Neal, County Extension Director, Hank DuFour, Human Resources Director, Marie Goen, Management and Budget Manager, Don Wêst, County Engineer, Don Cole, Acquisitions Manager, Roger Shinn, Central Services Manager, Charlie Bicht, Purchasing Manager, Mike Bowers, Road and Bridge Manager, Leo Cordeiro, Solid Waste Manager, Gayla Barwick, Tourism, Sonya Smith, Public Information Officer, Becky Padrick, MSBU Coordinator, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES( 1-032) It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve the minutes of the meeting held December 5, 2000; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMA TION/PRESENT A TIONS(I-038) A. Resolution No. 00-282- Proclaiming the month of December 2,000 as "Civil Air Patrol Month" in S1. Lucie County, Florida. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 00-282; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. Resolution No. 00-283- Proclaiming December 13,2000 as "Founding Day" in St. Lucie County, Florida, in Honor of"St. Lucie". It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 00-283; ;and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. Ms. Jane Rawley was present to accept the Proclamation. -1- ~ ""'" _,. ", "....~,. :.:.. .'J' 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS(1-120) Ms. Joyce Calvert, a grove owner in St. Lucie County, addressed the Board regarding the Johnston Road MSBU.1Io She stated she had concerns and would like to meet with the Commissioners on an individual basis. Mr. Robert Anderson, Indrio resident, addressed the Board regarding the closing of the jetty. The County Administrator advised Mr. Anderson that the reason for this was due to heavy machinery and dangerous materials in the area at that time. 4. CONSENT AGENDA(l-379) It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the Consent Agenda with inclusion of the additions and the deletion of items C-2A and C-6B; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List No. 10. 2. LEISURE SERVICES A. This item was pulled. B. Agreement Approval- The Board approved the Agreement between St. Lucie County and The Treasure coast Umpires Association and authorized the chairman to sign the agreement. C. Florida Coast Professional Baseball School Agreement- The Board approved terminating the existing agreement and approved the new agreement. D. Field Dedication - The Board approved the recommendation of the Ft. Pierce American Little. League's request to dedicate Field No.2 to Robert "Coach" Hardman, Sr., in tribute for his years of commitment to the youth of St. Lucie County. 3. PUBLIC WORKS A. Kings Highway Industrial Park Street Lighting District- Permission to Advertise- the Board approved advertising a public hearing to be held on January 9, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. B. Road and Bridge/Bid Waiver and Purchase from Quotation- The Board approved the purchase of a 14' flatbed dump truck from Freightliner of South Florida in the amount of $47,426.84. C. Road and Bridge/Bid Waiver and Purchase from Quotation- The Board approved the purchase ofa chemical spray truck from Sunrise Ford in the amount of $37,690. D. Road and Bridge/Bid Waiver and Purchase from Quotation- The Board approved the purchase of a trash dump truck with lightning loader arm from Freightliner of South Florida in the amount of$75,789. -2- 12/08/00 FZABWARR FUND 001 001002 001124 001127 001128 001130 001221 001246 001252 001255 001807 101 10 1002 101003 102 102001 105 107 107002 140 140001 140306 160 183 183001 183004 185001 185203 186 186204 304 310002 310003 315 316 362 382 401 418 421 441 451 461 471 491 501 505 505001 510 611 625 '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD WARRANT LIST #10- 02-DEC-2000 TO 08-DEC-2000 ,FUND SUMMARY ;" .. /J' . TITLE General Fund FBIP 97/98 Boating Related Activit FTA USC Sectio~5g07 FY 99/00 National Endowment Humanities Section 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning FY01 TC Community Action Agency FYOO/01 001-DEP-Childrens's Enviro Museum 99/00 Emergency Mgmt. Prep & Assist Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab Grant Fla Fish and Wildlife Conservation Floridian Aquifer Well Monitoring Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Port & Airport Fund Port Fund DOT-New N. Entrance Port Ft. Pierce Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court SHIP Housing Assistance FY 00/01 FHFA-SHIP 98/99 Recycling Operating Fund Recycling & Education Grant FYOO/Ol Communication System Fund Impact Fees-Parks Impact Fees-Public Buildings County Building Fund County Capital Sports Complex Improv Fund Environmental Land Capital Fund Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund , North Hutchinson Island Utilities S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund Holiday Pines Utilities Fund Building Code Fund Information Technology Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Service Garage Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Li brary GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES , 348, 119 . 24 34,431. 63 27.25 291.15 35,325.95 2,161.50 34,120.50 585.95 396.44 30.26 90.94 65,828.33 250,000.00 24,844.00 22,517.54 11,751.83 10,956.53 47,029.48 6,658.43 8,330.27 500.00 8,541.00 11,134.02 2,326.42 944.28 819.04 1,307.62 54.09 1,344.75 343.73 3,983.42 42,369.67 53.59 33,500.00 161,354.22 2,500.00 91,122.76 58,834.26 26,082.26 2,515.15 67,618.62 41,427.18 20,180.84 1,402.83 10,690.93 68,917.89 891.42 2,005.54 7,642.78 4,543.54 481. 88 1,578,930.95 """'" PAGE 1 PAYROLL 281,769.79 0.00 363.67 0.00 5,812.29 796.57 0.00 0.00 1,188.80 0.00 1,188.80 96,798.68 0.00 0.00 42,906.73 3,729.68 2,320.55 83,428.01 0.00 6,002.62 0.00 0.00 2,219.20 4,387.00 1,850.58 2,673.73 2,429.22 0.00 1,789.02 596.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 36,340.19 21,115.32 189.75 3,442.19 2,057.44 8,269.40 1,711. 75 18,932.99 67,341.07 3,034.75' 1,626.22 9,063.03 3,122.17 0.00 " 718,497.55 '-' "" .-.", ".>-~< ::. ..,'"' E. Okeechobee RoadlDelaware Avenue Landscaping- The Board approved a $55,000 contribution to the City of Ft. Pierce for landscaping and authorized the Chairman to sign ill' the agreement. F. South County Regional Sports Stadium Funding- The Board approved using Public Works Investment for the Future money and General Fund Contingency to be reimbursed by RFP monies to advance revenues in the amount of$255,977.23 to complete the stadium and to declare an emergency and waive the bid process to retain Lawrence Fency and Conceptual Graphics for the perimeter fencing and entrance way sign. Com. Hutchinson questioned if we were going to follow through with the donation's and actively solicit them and if this would be brought back to the city council. The Public Works Director stated we would and that he had scheduled a meeting this week with the school board. He believes there is going to be a three way partnership with the State, the School Board and the city of Port St. Lucie along with private parties who wish to donate to the project in order to complete it. G. Indian River Estates/Savannas Ecosystem Management Project- The Board approved Change Order No.1 to extend the grant agreement with the St. Johns River Water Management District for six months and authorized the Chairman to sign the change order. H Solid Waste/Sale of Landfill Methane Gas- The Board approved the negotiations between the Landfill and Tropicana for the sale of landfill methane gas· at the Glades Road Landfill approved the December 1, 2000 proposal from Camp Dresser & McKee, Inc. for contract negotiations and the development of technical, financial, and business parameters for the agreement for a total lump sum cost of $29,290. 1. Solid Waste/Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc.. Proposal for Annual Permit Compliance- The Board approved the December 4, 2000 proposal for the Glades Road and Golf Course Landfills to address Groundwater Testing & Reporting, Landfill Annual Aerial Survey and Financial Responsibility Update, Video Survey and Evaluation of the Landfill Leachate Collection System, and Continuing Consulting Services for a total annual amount of$15l,550. 4. PURCHASING A. Bid Waiver and Purchase- The Board approved the bid waiver and purchase of a used motor grader from Equipment Senter in the amount of$128,900. B. Copier Service Agreement- The Board approved the agreement with Max Davis Associates, and authorized the Chairman to sign the agreement. C. Bid Waiver & Sole Source Purchase- The Board approved the bid waiver and sole source purchase from McQuay Service for a replacement coil for the Rock Road Jail Chiller in the amount of$10,595. D. RFP 00-091- Advertising Services for Tourist Development Council- The Board approved rejecting all proposals received and granted permission to re-advertise the RFP. -3- '-" ...., ......;.. ~ .,.. . ' 5. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Quit Claim Deêä~/St. James Drive/Faith Tabernacle ofFt. Pierce, Inc.- The Board approved signing the Quit Claim Deeds, recorded the Quit-Claim Deeds in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. B. Resolution No. 00-21l/Escambia County Housing Finance Authority Single Family Mortgage Revenue Bonds, Series 2001- The Board approved adopting Resolution No. 00-211 as drafted. 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Tourism- The Board approved payment of the November invoices to R.J. Gibson in the amount of$5,923.25. Com. Coward stated he would like to see such things as business cards be done in-house these are the monies being discussed for capital projects which we currently do not have the money for. B. Resolution No. 00-138/Crimson North Group Limited- This item was pulled for one week until December 19,2000 giving staffthe opportunity to meet with the developer. Com. Barnes expressed his concerns with building homes too close to the water and the potential for erosion in the future. He would like to protect those buying the property. He would like for the construction to take place as far west as possible and still make use of the property. Mr. Cuozzo, representing the developer addressed Com. Barnes' concerns. He would be willing to place a condition that they build as far to the east as possible, but, he just does not know what exactly that would mean. The County Attorney suggested this be delayed for one week giving staff and the developer time to work on some language they could both be comfortable with. The developer's representative concurred with this suggestion. C. Final Plat Review- The Board approved the final plat for the subdivision to be known as Parcel 7b at The Reserve (Torrey Pines) and authorized staff to proceed with its final processmg. D. Final Plat Review- The Board approved the final plat for the subdivision to be known as Parcel 32 at the Reserve (Spyglass) and authorized staffto proceed with its final processing. E. Final Plat Review- The Board approved the final plat for the subdivision to be known as Mainstreet Village at the Reserve, and authorized staff to proceed with its final processing. 6. COMMUNITY SERVICES Grant Acceptance- The Board approved accepting the Drug Control and System Improvement (Edward Byrne) Grant for FY 00/01 and authorized the Chairman to sign all documents necessary for the grant. 7. HUMAN RESOURCES -4- ~ ....., " .,.>~' ... .1" _ . Central ServicesfSäÍary AdjustmentIRock Road Facility- The Board approved the salary adjustment of$1.00 per hour for full time employees at the Rock Road Jail Facility. ADDITIONS ill . A.l Agriculture Mileage Reimbursement- The Board approved to continue paying mileage to Agricultural Agents at the existing rates through December while new procedures are being developed. Staff will be reporting on the new procedures at the December 19,2000 Board meeting. REGULAR MEETING 5. PUBLIC WORKS(l-1233) Consider staff recommendation to adopt the following Resolutions, stating the County's intent to use the uniform method of collecting non-ad valorem special assessments which may be levied by the corresponding municipal service benefits units. A. Resolution No. 00-237/Johnston Road MSBU- It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 00-237; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. Resolution No. 00-238/Cory Campbell MSBU- It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 00-238; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. C. Resolution No. 00-239/King Orange 2 MSBU- It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 00-239; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. D. Resolution No. 00-240/Skylark 2 MSBU- It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 00-240; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. E. Resolution No. 00-24l/Sunrise Park Unit One MSBU- It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 00-241; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. F. Resolution No. 00-242/San Lucie Plaza MSBU- It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 00-242; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimousl y. G. Resolution No. 00-243/St. Lucie Village MSBU- It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 00-243; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. Ms. Amy Wright, Rouse Road resident, addressed the Board regarding this MSBU and asked if all of St. Lucie Village would be affected. The MSBU Coordinator advised Ms. Wright that basically that at this time it is at a preliminary stage and they technically used Indrio Road as the North boundary and the South boundary would be just north of the north bridge. Information will be sent out to the property owners in the near future after the scheduled meeting with the Mayor of St. Lucie Village has taken place. -5- ~ 'wi '. ~. ~ ..,'" Mr. Robert Anderson, resident, addressed the Board regarding the fact that St Lucie Village is not Indrio, it stops at Rouse Road. His property is located east of US 1 and south of Indrio Road he would like a copy of what is available so he may inform his neighbors. '10 . Com. Coward questioned the beginning of the process. The MSBU Coordinator addressed Com. Coward's question. She also advised the Board that there are some areas in St. Lucie Village which are pockets that are within the unincorporated area of the county. This would need to be ajoint partnership with the Village and the county, this was initiated on behalf of St. Lucie Village. All correspondence pertaining to this project will be mailed to everyone within the district . Mr. Anderson questioned the way this project was presented in the newspaper and the mapping of the project boundaries. There are residents ofIndrio Road who do not know what is going on at this time. H. Resolution No. 00-244/West 151 Street MSBU- It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve Resolution No. 00-244; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. Resolution No. 00-245/Grey Twig Lane MSBU- It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 00-245; and, upon roll call, motion carriéd unanimously. 1. Resolution No. 00-246/Revels Lane 1 MSBU- It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 00-246; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. K. Resolution No. 00-247/Revels Lane 2 MSBU- It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve Resolution No. 00-247; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. L. Resolution No. 00-248/Airport Industrial Park MSBU- It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 00-248; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. M. Resolution No. 00-249/Smallwood MSBU- It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve Resolution No. 00-249; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 6. LEISURE SERVICES(1-2286) A. South County Regional Stadium Sponsorship Agreement/The Country Store Sub Shop/Budget Resolution No. 00-278; Consider staff recommendation to accept the first year $250 Corporate Sponsorship Installment, approve the budget resolution and authorize the Chairman to sign the letter of appreciation. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. South County Regional Stadium Sponsorship Agreement/State Farm Insurance/Budget Resolution No. 00-279- Consider staff recommendation to accept the first year $250 Corporate Sponsorship Installment from State Farm Insurance Agents, Larry Lee, Jr., Bill Knight, Mike Rice, Terry Mosley, Phil White, and Scott Price, approve the budget resolution and authorize the Chairman to sign the letters of appreciation. -6- ~ ......, .'. "'N-' ,,' ;¡.. ..1" ~ . It was moved by Com. Cow~d, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 7. PURCHASING (1-2393) ill . Proposed Policy Changes to Increase County Efficiencies- Staff requested direction on five (5) proposed changes to BOCC Policy. A resolution will be presented to the Board to place any of the proposed changes into effect. The Purchasing Manager reviewed the threshold for bids. Com. Coward addressed the on-line service and expressed his concerns with the local businesses not being made aware of the quotation participation request. He requested that other interested parties be notified that may not be in our data base so they can be included in the process as well. Com. Bruhn questioned how the Board would know what staff is doing if the Board does not review the 20% in quotations. The Purchasing Manager stated the County Administrator does the approvals at the present threshold of $1 0,000 and the present request is to increase the threshold of approval by the Administrator. Com. Coward commented on the monies allocated in the budget and the changes which can be approved by the County Administrator. The County Administrator advised the Board of the fact that the budget is done many months in advance and if a department needs to change the request of a piece of equipment that was budgeted they are asking for the authority to approve these requests provided they are within the budgeted amount. He will be providing the Board with monthly reports tracking the money as well as providing the information to the office of Management and Budget and the Finance Department. Com. Bruhn stated he did not want to see the threshold grow even higher next year and he does not mind reviewing small bids. He stated that when a policy change is made, it should be for a good reason. The County Administrator advised the Board of the overwhelming situations departments are running into with the heavy workloads. The Utilities Director advised the Board of a present situation with a pump station which is needed, and how this change would expedite the documents and the project. He stated this provides the ability to deal locally much easier for all. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward to approve changes 1-4 as proposed; to include quarterly updates; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Bruhn, Aye's: Lewis, Coward, Barnes, Hutchinson; motion carried by a vote of 4 to 1. Com. Hutchinson stated this was the part she was most uncomfortable with and gave the example of the lap tops. The County Administrator stated he would come around to all the Commissioners if there is an item other than what was budgeted before he signs the approval. -7- ~ ~ ..-. -. '-"~' :.;. ...' ~ . It was moved by Com. ~ewís, seconded by Com. Coward to approve option one on item 5 of the proposéd changes; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Bruhn, Aye's: Lewis, Coward, Barnes, Hutchinson; and, upon roll call, motion carried by a vote of 4 to 1. '1& . 8. COUNTY ATTORNEY(2-0266) Indian River Estates Stormwater Retention Project/Bowlick Parcel- Consider staff recommendation to approve the Contract for Sale and Purchase, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct staff to close the transaction and record the document in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. It was moved by Com. Bruhn,- seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 9. PUBLIC WORKS(2-0323) C & S F "Restudy" Project/Recommendation from the St. Lucie County Restudy Committee- Public Works staff concurs with the recommendations put forth by the County Restudy Committee and requests Board direction concerning development of a formal resolution to support the Indian River Lagoon Feasibility Study. Com. Barnes advised the Board he had to leave for an appointment, however he did wish to stàte his position on this item. He stated the read the committee's recommendations which he was aware they spent many hours compiling. He stated he agreed with the recommendation and he wanted to add that he hoped there would be some way to include urban stormwater however, he is aware that these are so far west that it might be impossible. Com. Hutchinson advised the Board that there is a meeting scheduled with Martin County tomorrow and the re-study group wanted to know if the Board was going to acknowledge their recommendation and get back to them. They are also looking for guidance as to where they are to go from this point. Com. Lewis stated she agreed with the recommendation however, would prefer to hold off for a while incase there are changes made down the road. Com. Coward concurred and stated that they do not have all the answers to lock the .county into specific positions. There are some items especially concerning the connector canal and some of the committee members were asking for additional information. Martin County has not had the opportunity to voice their opinion. Com. Bruhn stated he had questions on the location of the cells. It was the consensus of the Board to ask the committee to remain a part of this project and staff was directed to draft a resolution dealing specifically with the Indian River Lagoon feasibility study dealing with the general issues as discussed. C-7b- Request for authorization to submit a grant application on behalf of the St. Lucie County's Sheriff s office- Staff recommends the BCC approve the submission of the grant package, and authorize the Chairman to sign the application. The Sheriff-Elect wishes to apply for this grant. -8- '-' ...,.J ,,,........ ..,.... Com. Hutchinson requested in writing from the present administration that they are agreeable with this request. It was moved by Com.~ruhn, seconded by Com. Coward to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 10. ADMINISTRA nON (2-2022) A. Advisory Boards and Committees- Consider stafI recommendation to ratify the following appointments: Com. Bruhn- Fran Ross- re-appoint to the Code Enforcement Board Jeanne Hearn - re-appoint to the FT. Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee Jeffrey Garland- re-appoint to the Restudy Coordination Committee Lee Wheeler- Contractor's Certification Luz Baez, Housing Finance Committee Beverly Rushin, Investment Committee Ken Hogan, Citizens Budget Committee Com. Hutchinson- Marshall "Buck" Miller- re-appoint to the Citizen's Budget Comm. Larry Jennings - re-appoint to Recreation Advisory Board Com. Barnes - Glen Raines to the Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council Bob Bangert - Board of Adjustment Dolores Hogan Johnson- FP Harbor Advisory Committee Horace Hunter - Housing Finance Authority Kristen Metzger- Library Advisory Board Ramon Trias- Planning & Zoning Commission Bill Theiss- Restudy Coordination Committee Sam Comer - Vegetation Protection Committee It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Lewis to approve the stated appointments made by Commissioner's Bruhn, Barnes, and Hutchinson; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. Other Appointments: At Large Appointments: Treasure Coast Health Council, Inc., (Health Ins., Purchaser) Library Advisory Board Tourist Development Council The County Administrator advised the Board the above At- Large Appointments would be pulled and brought back in January. B. Bi- Weekly Committee Reports- The Board members gave updates on the various committees and advisory boards that they serve on. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. -9- Clerk of Circuit Court '" ~ ._, ", .,.>;.' .. ~.,r -."",I Chairman -10- '-' "'wI Board of County Commissioners Meeting December 19, 2000 Regular Agenda 2 Presentation - Jerome Rhyant, Love Center Regeneration Ministries, Inc. will request funding. It was requested by the Board that Mr. Rhyant set up a meeting with Sheriff- Elect Mascara. Comm. Barnes and Dan McIntyre will attend the meeting. [ ] Approved [ ] Denied [X ] Other See note above M. Anderson o ty Administrator Commission Action: - '-' "-" Board of County Commissioners Meeting December 19, 2000 Regular Agenda 2 Presentation - Jerome Rhyant, Love Center Regeneration Ministries, Inc. will request funding. It was requested by the Board that Mr. Rhyant set up a meeting with Sheriff- Elect Mascara. Comm. Barnes and Dan McIntyre will attend the meeting. [ ] Approved [ ] Denied [X ] Other See note above M. Anderson o ty Administrator Commission Action: .. .. w '-' INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: .---.- ,-' -~- ----< ,-1 \. "'-\ Œ 0 l~ J_- _"~-, \ \ r" DEC '8 2000 I i n FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C J c.A. NO: 00-1984 DATE: December 15, 2000 \ ~. L--:- \ ' SUBJECT: Law Enforcement Trust Fund Attached for information and review are copies of the following: Section 932.7055, Florida Statutes (2000) Attorney General Opinion 96-62 The statute provides for the disposition of forfeited funds. used for: As indicated, the funds may be school resource officer programs crime prevention programs safe neighborhood programs other law enforcement purposes including fraying the cost of protected or complex investigations, providing additional equipment or expertise and providing matching funds to obtain federal grants. The law provides that the funds may not be used to meet normal operating expenses of the law enforcement agency. The Attorney General's Opinion outlines the role of the Sheriff and the Board of County Commissioners in the process of determining how to spend the funds. According to the Attorney General, the expenditure of funds from the trust fund may only be initialed at the request of the Sheriff and his or her certification that such request complies with the law. The ultimate appropriation of funds is made by the Board of County Commissioners after due consideration of the Sheriff s request. If you have any questions, please let me know. DSM/mt Attachment copy to: Management & Budget Manager (w/enclosure) Finance Director (w/enclosure) , PROVISIONS SUPPlEMEN~ TO CRIMINAL PROCEDURE LAW ....., Ch. 932 .5. 2000 ;afety and Motor Vehicles may deposit receipts and 9venues received as a result of federal criminal, ldministrative, or civil forfeiture proceedings and eceipts and revenues received from federal asset- ;haring programs. The trust fund is exempt from the ;ervice charges imposed by s, 215.20. 2. Notwithstanding the provisions of s. 216.301 md pursuant to s. 216.351, any balance in the trust und at the end of any fiscal year shall remain in the rust fund at the end of that year and shall be available or carrying out the purposes of the trust fund. 3, Pursuant to the provisions of s. 19(f)(2), Art. III of the State Constitution, the trust fund shall. unless ter- minated sooner, be terminated on July 1, 2002, (2) Each trust fund listed in subsection (1) which is subject to termination pursuant to the provisions of s, 19(f)(2), Art. I \I of the State Constitution shall be reviewed prior to its scheduled termination as provided in s. 215.3206( 1) and (2). HiSlory.-S, 2. ch. 87-401; s, 1, ch. 98-389, 932.7055 Disposition of liens and forfeited prop- erty.- (1) When a seizing agency obtains a final judgment granting forieiture of real property or personal property. it may elect to: (a) Retain the property for the agency's use; (b) Sell the property at public auction or by sealed bid to the highest bidder, except for real property which should be sold in a commercially reasonable manner after appraisal by listing on the market; or (c) Salvage, trade, or transfer the property to any public or nonprofit organization, (2) If the forfeited property is subject to a lien pre- served by the court as provided in s, 932.703(6)(b), the agency shall: (a) Sell the property with the proceeds being used towards satisfaction of any liens; or (b) Have the lien satisfied prior to taking any action authorized by subsection (1). (3) The proceeds from the sale of forfeited property shall be disbursed in the following priority: (a) Payment of the balance due on any lien pre- served by the court in the forfeiture proceedings, (b) Payment of the cost incurred by the seizing agency in connection with the storage, maintenance, security, and forfeiture of such property. (c) Payment of court costs incurred in the forieiture proceeding. (4)(a) If the seizing agency is a county or municipal agency, the remaining proceeds shall be deposited in a special law enforcement trust fund established by the board of county commissioners or the governing body of the municipality. Such proceeds and interest earned therefrom shall be used for school resource officer, crime prevention, safe neighborhood, drug abuse edu- cation and prevention programs, or for other law enforcement purposes, which include defraying the cost of protracted or complex investigations, providing additional equipment or expertise and providing match- ing funds to obtain federal grants. The proceeds and interest may not be used to meet normal operating expenses of the law enforcement agency. (b) These funds may be expended :..:pon request by the sheriff to the board of county commissioners or by the chief of police to the governing body of the munici- pality, accompanied by a written certification that the request complies with the provisions of this subsection, and only upon appropriation to the sr,eriff's office or police department by the board of county commission- ers or the governing body of the municipality. (c) An agency or organization, other than the seiz- ing agency, that wishes to receive such funds shall apply to the sheriff or chief of police for an appropriation and its application shall be accompanied by a written certification that the moneys will be used for an author- ized purpose, Such requests for expenditures shall include a statement describing anticipated recurring costs for the agency for subsequent fiscal years. An agency or organization that receives money pursuant to this subsection shall provide an accounting for such moneys and shall furnish the same reports as an agency of the county or municipality that receives pub- lic funds. Such funds may be expended in accordance with the following procedures: 1. Such funds may be used only for school resource officer, crime prevention, safe neighborhood, drug abuse education, or drug prevention programs or such other law enforcement purposes as the board of county commissioners or governing body of the munici- pality deems appropriate. 2, Such funds shall not be a source of revenue to meet normal operating needs of the law enforcement agency. 3. After July 1, 1992, and during ever¡ fiscal year thereafter, any local law enforcement agency that acquires at least $15,000 pursuant to the Florida Con- traband Forfeiture Act within a fiscal year must expend or donate no less than 15 percent of such proceeds for the support or operation of any drug treatment, drug abuse education, drug prevention, crime prevention, safe neighborhood, or school resource officer program(s). The local law enforcement agency has the discretion to determine which program(s) will receive the designated proceeds, Notwithstanding the drug abuse education, drug treat- ment, drug prevention, crime prevention, safe neigh- borhood, or school resource officer minimum expendi- tures or donations, the sheriff and the board of county commissioners or the chief of police and the governing body of the municipality may agree to expend or donate such funds over a period of years if the expenditure or donation of such minimum amount in any given fiscal year would exceed the needs of the county or munici- pality for such program(s). Nothing in this section pre- cludes the expenditure or donation of forfeiture pro- ceeds in excess of the minimum amounts established herein. (5) If the seizing agency is a state agency, all remaining proceeds shall be deposited into the General Revenue Fund. However, if the seizing agency is: (a) The Department of Law Enforcement, the pro- ceeds accrued pursuant to the provisions of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act shall be deposited into the Forfeiture and Investigative Support Trust Fund as pro- 1477 .. '-' "wII Page 21 Citation Search Result Fla. AGO 96-62 (Cite as: 1996 WL 562023 (F1a.A.G.» Rank 5 of 9 Database FL-AG Office of the Attorney General State of Florida *1 AGO 96-62 August 16, 1996 RE: COUNTIES--SHERIFFS--CONTRABAND FORFEITURE TRUST FUNDS--use of funds to pay legal fees and computer upgrades; authority of county to appropriate funds. s. 932.701-704, Fla. Stat. Ms. Renee Francis Lee Charlotte County Attorney 18500 Murdock Circle Port Charlotte, Florida 33948-1094 Dear Ms. Lee: You have asked substantially the following questions: 1. Does the board of county commissioners have discretion in allowing funds to be expended from the contraband forfeiture trust fund when requested by the sheriff? 2. In the event the sheriff fails to pay legal fees associated with the forfeiture proceedings prior to depositing the funds in the trust fund, may the county use trust fund monies to pay such legal fees? 3. Is the upgrading of Florida Crime Information Center and the National Crime Information Center computers in the sheriff's office an appropriate use of the contraband forfeiture trust fund? In sum: 1. The board of county commissioners has ultimate discretion in determining whether contraband forfeiture trust fund monies will be expended for the purposes as requested by the sheriff. However, given the board's inability to expend such funds absent the sheriff's request and written certification that the request complies with the contraband forfeiture act, deference should be given to the sheriff's request. 2. In light of the statutory authority to pay the costs of the forfeiture proceedings with monies derived from the forfeiture prior to the money being placed in the trust fund, payment of the legal fees associated with the forfeiture would appear to be appropriate, even though the funds have been deposited in the forfeiture trust fund. 3. The cost of upgrading computers that function as a part of the day-to-day operations of the sheriff's Copr. © West 2000 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works , '-' ....., Page 22 Fla. AGO 96-62 (Cite as: 1996 WL 562023, *1 (FIa.A.G.» department would appear to be a normal operating expense of the department that may not be paid from the contraband forfeiture trust fund. Question One Sections 932.701-932.707, Florida Statutes, constitute the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. Section 932.702, Florida Statutes, makes it unlawful: (1) To transport, carry, or convey any contraband article in, upon, or by means of any vessel, motor vehicle, or aircraft. (2) To conceal or possess any contraband article. (3) To use any vessel, motor vehicle, aircraft, other personal property, or real property to facilitate the transportation, carriage, conveyance, concealment, receipt, possession, purchase, sale, barter, exchange, or giving away of any contraband article. (4) To conceal, or possess, or use any contraband article as an instrumentality in the commission of or in aiding or abetting in the commission of any felony or violation of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. (5) To acquire real or personal property by the use of proceeds obtained in violation of the Florida Contraband Forfeiture Act. The act states that any contraband article, vessel, motor vehicle, aircraft, personal property, or real property used in violation of its terms may be seized and shall be forfeited pursuant to its provisions. [FN1] When the seizing agency is a county or municipality, the act provides that after payment of certain liens and costs the remaining proceeds shall be deposited in a special law enforcement trust fund established by the board of county commissioners or the governing body of the municipality. [FN2] *2 Section 932.7055(4) (b), Florida Statutes, states: These funds may be expended upon request by the sheriff to the board of county commissioners or by the chief of police to the governing body of the municipality, accompanied by a written certification that the request complies with the provisions of this subsection, and only upon appropriation to the sheriff's office or police department by the board of county commissioners or the governing body of the municipality. (e.s.) The act sets forth the procedure whereby funds may be expended from a contraband forfeiture trust fund only upon request by the sheriff when accompanied by a written certification that the request complies with the act and when appropriated to the sheriff's department by the board of county commissioners. [FN3] As recognized by this office in Attorney General's Opinion 91-69, a county council was not authorized to expend funds from a contraband trust fund absent a request and the required certification from the sheriff/ director of public safety. Similarly, the board of county commissioners is the governing board that holds the authority to decide whether to appropriate the funds to the sheriff's department after the request has been made. [FN4] This legislatively prescribed system requiring the sheriff to make the initial determination that an expenditure should be made from the contraband forfeiture trust fund and to certify in writing that the request fulfills a purpose under Copr. © West 2000 No Claim to Orig. u.S. Govt. Works '-' "wi Page 23 Fla. AGO 96-62 (Cite as: 1996 WL 562023, *2 (Fla.A.G.» the act would appear to require the county commission to give some deference to the sheriff's determination when it makes the ultimate decision as to whether such funds should be appropriated for the requested purpose. Accordingly, while the expenditure of funds from a contraband forfeiture trust fund may be initiated only at the request of the sheriff and his or her certification that such request complies with the provisions of the contraband forfeiture act, the ultimate appropriation of such funds is to be made by the board of county commissioners after due consideration of the sheriff's request. Question Two Section 932.7055(3), Florida Statutes, provides: The proceeds from the sale of forfeited property shall be disbursed in the following priority: (a) Payment of the balance due on any lien preserved by the court in the forfeiture proceedings. (b) Payment of the cost incurred by the seizing agency in connection with the storage, maintenance, security, and forfeiture of such property. (c) Payment of court costs incurred in the forfeiture proceeding. (e.s.) Thus, the act clearly contemplates that the payment of costs associated with the forfeiture of the contraband has priority over the payment of court costs or the enumerated purposes for which monies may be used after the proceeds have been placed in the trust fund. In light of this statutory prioritization of payment of proceeds from the sale of contraband, payment of legal fees incurred as a part of the forfeiture proceedings would appear to be appropriate even though the funds have been deposited in the forfeiture trust fund. [FNS] *3 Question Three The act provides that the proceeds from a forfeiture and the interest earned therefrom may only be used for school resource officer, crime prevention, safe neighborhood, drug abuse education and prevention programs, or for other law enforcement purposes, which ¡ include defraying the cost of protracted or complex investigations, providing additional equipment or expertise and providing matching funds to obtain federal grants. The proceeds and interest may not be used to meet normal operating expenses of the law enforcement agency. [FN6] Given the statutory prohibition against using contraband trust funds as a source of revenue to meet normal operating needs of a law enforcement agency, this office has consistently concluded that contraband funds should be used only for the expressly specified purposes or for other extraordinary programs and purposes, beyond what is usual, normal, regular or established. [FN7] According to the materials you have provided, in order for the sheriff's department to maintain its link with the Florida Crime Information Center (FCIC) and the National Crime Information Center (NCIC), the existing computer system must be upgraded. This computer link is the primary means of communication between the sheriff's department and the state and national data bases Copr. © West 2000 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works ~ """'" Page 24 Fla. AGO 96-62 (Cite as: 1996 WL 562023, *3 (Fla.A.G.» containing information regarding criminal offenders. According to your letter, the need to upgrade the computer system was not known at the time the sheriff's annual budget was prepared and the expense of upgrading the system is not covered by current budget categories. Under these circumstances, you assert that such upgrades would fall within the "additional equipment" that may be obtained using forfeiture trust fund monies. It would appear, however, that the computer link between the sheriff's office and the FCIC/NCIC was and continues to be a part of the day-to-day operation of the sheriff's department in carrying out its law enforcement functions. While the upgrades necessary to continue the link may have been unforeseen at the time the sheriff's operating budget was being prepared, it does not appear that such upgrades are for an extraordinary purpose. Accordingly, it is my opinion that the upgrading of computers in the sheriff's department would be a part of the normal operating costs of the department that may not be funded from the contraband forfeiture trust fund. Sincerely, Robert A. Butterworth Attorney General [FN1]. See, s. 932.703(1) (a), Fla. Stat. [FN2]. See, s. 932.7055(4) (a), Fla. Stat. [FN3]. See generally, Alsop v. Pierce, 19 So. 2d 799, 805-806 (Fla.1944) (a legislative directive as to how a thing should be doneis, in effect, a prohibition against its being done in any otherwaYi where the Legislature has prescribed the mode, that modemust be observed) .. [FN4]. See, Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 81-99 (1981) (board of county commissioners vested with exclusive authority to decide appropriation of contraband trust funds to the sheriff's office). See also, Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 78-55 (1978), concluding that it is the duty and responsibility of the governing bodies of the affected counties and municipalities to approve or disapprove the expenditures from, and the appropriation of, funds collected under the contraband forfeiture act. [FN5] Cf., Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 93-6 (1993), in which this office concluded that funds from a contraband forfeiture trust fund established pursuant to s. 932.7055, Fla. Stat., could not be used to repay monies advanced or loaned to the fund by a city for authorized expenditures. Copr. © West 2000 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works '-" -...I Page 25 Fla. AGO 96-62 (Cite as: 1996 WL 562023, *3 (FIa.A.G.» [FN6]. Section 932.7055 (4) (a), Fla. Stat. [FN7]. See, Op. Att'y Gen. Fla. 83-9 (1983) (trust fund may not be used to compensate physician's assistant rendering medical services at the county jail as furnishing medical care and treatment to county prisoners is an ongoing, normal or regular duty and function of the sheriff's office). And see, Ops. Att'y Gen. Fla. 91-69 (1991) (special law enforcement team patrolling highway deemed normal activity not payable from trust fund) and 86-48 (1986) (county may not use trust fu:q.d to construct 'an evidence storage building) . Fla. AGO 96-62, 1996 WL 562023 (Fla.A.G.) END OF DOCUMENT Copr. © West 2000 No Claim to Orig. U.S. Govt. Works ... :,0, "wi ~ MEMORANDUM TO: Doug Anderson, County A.dministra.tor FROM; Un<kr.heriffDennis M. Wìl1laxns þ-10 I DATE: December 14, 2000 SUBJECT: Love Center NUMBER: OO.lZ.03 ML-hcxaL ~ :f -/em (kJ. ~c. I have discussed your memo regarding L.B.To' funds for the Love Center Regeneration with Sheriff Knowles and with counsel for the Sheriff. Drug abuse education and prevention programs contemplated by F.S. 932.7055 are limited to those programs performed by or through a law enforcement agency. Under the law, a program for drug abuse prevention, such as the Love Center RegeneratioIlf is not allowed. I trUSt this anSwers your question. 15 cc: County Cowrnissioners Mr. Harvey lincoln, Management and Budget Mr. Dan Mclntyre, County Attorney Mr. Robert Bradshaw, Åssistant County Attorney Sheriff~Elect Ken Mascara 12/12/2000 11:28 !lOUd Of Ðtncton ~,..".,. M.D. -*- Rr.pnt 0.. AÞfIn UII. PIIIOI Rth ~ M_ \.... -..n1W:M ~~.... Ad'¥ta01')' IIoN'4 lMI r.... v.." 0.- ~8entwn a.ø.....~ brflt HpI, r.".A. WIMItII N--. U....telCaIIInan ¡...., ..... PIIIIf ~ H~¡:_ J.INt ,... ..... '-"'*' AI ........ ... ........ "-" J:...... .... D.-. "Ita ,..., ... P..ICMz tMtM~- 5&14501'387 LOVE CENTER PAGE 01 ...... .'wJI ).JGm IJoo ~~ Love Center Regeneration Ministries, IDC. ~o.. Box 2384 · Port PierceI' Florida 349M · 5e1/480-~445 !"ax156:1/480-1987 Dteelfther12,2008 To: DiaJte Tuner Fu. ## 462-1131 Ref: COBat)' CODIJ8i11ioDers MeetÌIII Deeetaber 19,1000 Jeromc Rh,...t of Tit. Lo". ee.ter ttep_entios Mmistries, 11Ie. ¡. req....ö.. to be placed o. the a,_ða to .peak before the COIDDI..ioaen to follow tbroap .'tll bis 01'1'..' req.- ,..diaa· Tk..k YOB, S~ ~ Evie Keødall 460-1445 (work) 3'8-0531 (eeII) 'lÐ/18/20ÐIð-,14:15 5b145Ð~? LOVE CEt~TER PAGE Ð1 ~ ve Center Regeneration Ministries. Inc. RO. BoX 23M . Fort Fierce.. f'lorlda 34954 · 561/460..2445 f'aX: 561/460...1987 Boanl Of Directors RlahwclAl!.h, MJ). To: Di e Turner JalOll1lRhII,nr 'Faxll 2..2131 Dr. ""'" t&IItlt PUIOt Pall .-cC'*lI U.lfelmc:lu WIIII,m RI/QI ~rv¡""~\I Ref: C unty Commissionen Meeting December 5, 2000 AdVI8OI'Y Boar4 LIII1I Lø. J... v_ DIørI .....,.. e...-. P..III~W Clull :"tfII, c.P.A. Wlnclwh it,fr/IIIOn U~ CoI...,., in." '.1It PeuI ~II '"'... r:."" .JallII I4fwt a_td Lamon AI .Jo/II1tth ..,. ~naIcJ Mannv HrMncU JMI 0..... MIb HwIet Jalln ~ ~IHIII ~It Rhy.at of The Love Center RegenendioD Ministries, Ine. l' 81 to be plaeed OD the agenda to speak before the ComminloDers to funding. '-' """"" M EM 0 RA ND UM #00-183 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY CO FROM: DOUGLAS M. ANDERSON! DATE: SEPTEMBER 13, 2000 g¿NECT: BUDGET NOTES FOR SEPTEMBER 14TH WORKSHOP 1. Love Center Rel!eneration - Please find attached a copy of the minutes of the July 21, 1998 and the July 15, 1999 Budget Workshops where the Love Center Regeneration funding requests were considered. At the July 15, 1999 workshop the representative from Love Center Regeneration asked if the County could fund them at $50,000 for capital, they would not return next year to ask for funding assistance. 2. Grant Adjustments for the Fiscal Year 2001 Budget - Please find attached a summary report prepared by the Office ofManagementlBudget recommending that adjustments for the grants outlined in the report be approved. This is necessary to properly report the various grants in the Fiscal Year 2001 Budget. DMA:OO-183 c: Marie Gouin, Interim Management/Budget Director Robert Bradshaw, Assistant County Administrator Beth Ryder, Community Services Director Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney , ~ '-' 9 ) ~/r,'¿) C . 6 CC- /166¿./'f¿~vn n oV - - ;ß61' ;;$ /4S 5&-é /0 Cø. þk~ /'7 ' .5'-</' {, /J . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS #/¡ ð ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA U /V ,,;6,': .....,1 ~t:lV 6- C&'r'b<- BUDGET WORI~SESSION ·..-·...--···T· . ...- Date: July 15, 1999 Tape: 1-4 Convened: 10:30 a.m. Adjourned: 5: 15 p.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Paula A. Lewis; CíiffBarnes; John D. Bruhn, Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator; Phil Freeland, Asst. County Administrator; Jack Southard, Public Safety, Mike Hiott, Veteran's Services Manager; James David, Mosquito Control; Harvey Lincoln, M & B Manager, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk Tape 1 ... PUBLIC WORKS RECAP The' Public Works Director advised the Board that there 20 to 30 additional miles of roads which I '. millings are applicable. The second year Ol1t of milling program can be moved up to next year. However, if an MSBU should be scheduled, this would complicate and delay the millings schedule. The Board will be advised should an MSBU be scheduled and the millings budget can be carried over to next year. The Public Works Director advised the Board that Orange County is presently utilizing an intermediate type of product which costs $100,000 per mile which is more applicable to heavier traffic and higher speeds." ' . J '.: The Road and Bridge Manager reviewed upcoming projects for the Board and stated he would bring an updated list to the Board in January, 2000 of what has been completed and a decision can be made then, should any money remain, on what'.!Jrojects c::hould be done. Com. Bruhn suggested trying millings on a short bike bath to see how effective it is . Com. Coward suggested testing it on mosquito im'p'oundment roads which are presently dirt roads. TAB 16 COUNTY EXTENSION This budget reflects a 6% decrease. *** It was the consensus of the Board io appro~e this budget. '", ." TAB 21 HUMAN SERVICES , This budget reflects a 16% decrease. * ** It was the consensus of the Board to approve this budget. '-' ~ TAB 19 PUBLIC SAFETY DIVISIONS ANIMAL CONTROL This budget reflects a 1 % increase. The Public Safety Manager advised the Board that the,:?% expenditure increase is due to the increase in fees by the Humane Society. The County Administrator addressed the draft ordinance requiring licenses for animals to generate revenues. Com. Barnes stated he wanted to review the expericn:.~s tÞe 0t~~er cities had with this type of an ordinance and see just how much it cut down Qn the animals being picked up before he would 'vote for the ordinance. The cost for the license would be $5.00 for.spade; $10.00 for unspade animals. ** * It was the consensus of thc Board to approve advcrtising this ordinance for a public hearing. TAB 20 EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT This budget reflects 0% change. TAB 21 I CENTRAL COMMUNICATIONS This budget reflects a 2% increase. ThL: i;; ·.;.Í10re .th ~ ~.; () dispatch departments are combined. The cost for the salary adjustments is $248,'483. Com. Barnes stated that there is a different in s~la~ies for law enforcement dispatch and fire paramedic dispatch and this is due to the specialized fraining in the fire department. The County Administrator stated the money has been placed in the budget, however, they will review the salary survey. It is not sure what will be done until this survey is reviewed. Com. Bruhn suggested the law enforcement dispatcher~; obtain the same qualifications as the fire department and then they can be brought up to the,same pay scale. The County Administrator stated the Board does not need to implement the increase in salary, it is entirely up to the Board. ' 'I< U It was the consensus of the BOnl'd' to proceed \~ ith tb~ '~:'ìmbining of the two departments. Salary issues to be discussed at a later date.' ' TAB 22 RAD /PUBLIC SAFETY " This budget reflect a 2% increase. ** 'I< It was the consensus ?f the Board to approve~!\is budget. TAB 23 MARINE SAFETY This budget reflects a 1 % decrease. * ** It was the consensus of the BOal'd to approve this budget. -2- '-" ....I TAB 18 VETERAN'S SERVICES This budget reflects a 2% decrease. ", *** It was the consensus of the Board to approve this budget. . . . .... .. TAPE 2 TAB 37 MOSQUITO CONTROL ·"':::.i, .... This budget reflects a 4% decrease. *** It was the consensus of the Board to approve this budget. OUTSIDE AGENCIES TAPE 2 CHAMBER OF COMMERCE , '.. ,'" 'It The Chamber of Commerce is requesting fundi'ng '~f $.175,.000\ The County Administrator budgeted $75,000 . Com. Lewis made opening remarks regarding this btJ'dg'et, ~hJ iequested the Board consider increasing the amount budgeted to $190,000. / I ' Com. Barnes stated he would be happy with the $100,000. Com. Coward questioned the amounts,that wiU be givr.n by the city of Port St. Lucie and the city of Ft. Pierce. Marty Sanders, President of the Chamber of Commerce, advised the Board that they have made a request to the cities, however, they have not had thcir budget sessions as yet. ". . I . ~ . Mayor Fielding from the city of Port St. Lucìë, 'advised the Board that even though they have not had their budget sessions yet, they are looking to provide the Chamber with $15,000, Com. Coward questioned the self sufficient efforts of the Chamber and if this would ever happen. . Mr. Sanders advised the Board that they were looking into private fund raising efforts. , Mr. Hal Roberts, representing Harbor Federal Bank. addres~ed the Board regarding the requested funding. Mr. Howard V.P. Governmental Relations, Chamber of Commerce, encouraged the Board to continue the development partnership and asked the Board to r~consider giving the Chamber the requested funding of$175,OOO. Mr. AI Rivett, also tì'oin the Chamber advised the Board that tHey are trying to increase the contributions from the private sector to betwee.n $,~q:.-.$75,OOO. Com. Hutchinson asked if they could accept $100,000. / Mr. Howard stated he would accept $150,000. Com. Lewis stated everyone is tightening the belt and thë county does not have that amount this year. -3- '-' ....., ¡.;, .. 'þ \... ',('. .,'¡ Mr. Sanders stated they would work with the countY'Gll ec.o~():nic development on what ever level of funding they decide on. " . . . .. * ** It was the consensus of the maj ority of the Board 3/2 to fund the Chamber at $100,000 and further consideration will be given if other::ftlO,ds are made available. " TAPE 2 TAB 55 SOIL CONSERVATION DISTRICT *** It was the consensus of the Board to approve this budget~ ·f:, .' I'" ." TAB 56 OUTSIDE HUMAN SERVICES AGENCIES ABBIEJEAN RUSSELL In 1995 the Board voted to discontinue funding after FY ~ .·:~6 and in 1997/98 authorized and funded a operational review of the care ce~'ter. $200,000 was funded in FY 98/99. The FY 99/00 request is $100,000 which, if approve~, woq1.d be' applied t~ r~duce the health insurance , ...\.. .... debt owed the county. .', . .:' *** It was the consensus of the Board to approve this request. ALPHA HEALTH SERVICES, INC., ThrFY 99/00 match request is $37,751. *** It was the cqns~ns~ls of the Boa~d to. appr~ve, this request. . .. \.. 1\ .. i . .. THE ARC OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, INC. The ARC has received funding for a wheel chair equipped ve:h:.-.:!e under V.S.C. 5310, and is requesting the required 10% vehicle match of $5,000. *** It was the consensus of the Board to approve this request. COUNCIL ON AGING OF S'!-,C/COMMUNITY TRANSIT The Board provides the required match for these programs under the Older Americans Act and community Care for the Elderly program. The FY 99/00 mntch requirement for the Older American Act is $54,606 and for the Community Care for the Elderly program $50,073. *** It was the consensus of the Board to approve this request. . . . . . \.. COMMUNITY TRANSIT ., '" The Board provides the required ]0% l'I'hlL.i\ wr vc;,¡·:L:: pUl'chased under V.S.C. formerly (Section 16) and V.S.C. Section 5307 (formerly Section So), '.Jut' the Community Transit does not anticipate any purchases this yea. CULTURAL AFFAIRS COUNCIL" This Council promotes the development of the ' arts in cur county and receives f'llnding from the sale of a speciality license tág. In FY 98/99 the Board allocated $6,000 and the request for FY 99/00 is $3,900 to get them through October ,I, 1999. This item will be brought before the Board before 1 n~l r.)C) for approval. . -4- ~ ......, ... 0° , . .' . , DEAF SERVICE CENTER~OF rHE TREASURE COAST This was placed in the Human Services budget'· ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY HEALTH D.:EPARTMENT The Health Department requested the same level funding as last year of $600,000. ,".! I.' , *** It was the consensus of the Board tò approve ~his request. HEALTHY START COALIT~O~ OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY The Board has provided match funding'ror prenatal ~i.1 ~;and th~ request for FY 99/00 is for a 50% cost reimbursement match contract up to $40,000. " . ' ' *** It was the consensus of the Board to approv~,this request. TAPE 3 ." ST. LUCIE JUVENll.E ASSESSMENT CENTER This request would fund two intake assistants, "Pri~trak" support and maintenance contract (this is an electronic fingerprint system), two ISDN circu'it~,ai1d network computer support which is provided by St. Lucie County Automated Services; The FY 99/00 request is $60,000. Tl~is request has not been budgeted as per th~ County ~dministrator. *** No action talœn at this time will ~:.!:,...!:j:::~!. RESTORATION HOUSE The Board funded in FY 98/99 $20,000 rind the request' for FY 99/00 is $85,000. The County Administrato~ advised the Board that he has not allocated any funds in the budget for this request. * * * It was the consensus of the Board to fund this ~rogl'am at last year's level of $20,000. THE LOVE CENTER ~GE.NERATION, INC. ". . ~...'" .. . This is recently formed program targeting adult male substance addicts. In FY 98/99 the Board funded $42,500. The FY 99/00 request is $125,000. The County Administrator advised the Board that.h·~ 1..,'.5 not allocated any funds for this group in this year's budget. ' The request is for compl~tion of capital, not for o~-g~ing operational expenses. Com. Barnes suggested funding them at half (~~O,OOO) of the request at a dollar per dollar match. ), The representative'asked if the county could fund thelT~ at ~50,OOO for capital and they would not ) return next year to ask for fÙnding assistance. , , Com. Hutchinson stated she felt accountable for tht;,taxpayers money expended and felt the agencies should also show some kind of accou!1taqmty. for the f1.mds pro~i.ded and expended. -5- ' ... -... '-' . " ....., . . . I', Com. Barnes stated he would agree to the $50,000 funding, however, as per the representf'-tivc, no funds will be allocated in the budget next year. He wants to get out of the business of funding õut;id~~cíes. Restated he did not mind seed money for capital but, will not continue to fund a program year after ye~r. .. . ..' . Com. Hutchinson stated she would like t6'''šeè ihe¡fu~aing foi-"these agencies eliminated, the , I county cannot continue to fund all the un-mandated· requests. Com. Coward concurred with Com. Hutchinson. In the future, there will be a process 'any agency reqùesting assistance will have to follow. *** It was the consensus of the Board to allocate $50,000 for capital. TAPE 4 NEW HORIZONS The County Administrator advised the Board of the followi!1g recommendations: County Match Bridge to Recovery Forensics $538,295 28,840 89,457 , ' ~ I ..; ,,'........... Sub-total $656,592 The' above amount is budgeted for FY 99/00. I *** It was the consensus of the Board to approve the a~nount budgeted for FY 99/00. . ~ . . . . The meeting was adjourned. \. '., , -6- '-" ....., ¡'.. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BUDGET WORKSESSION Date: July 21, 1998 Tape: 1-2 ,Convened: 1 :40 p.m. Adjourned: 4:00 p.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Gary D. Charles, Sr., Paula A. Lewis, Ken Sattler, John D. Bruhn, CliffBames Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator; Phil Freeland, Asst. County Administrator; Chris Hartley, Finance Director; Harvey Lincoln,M & B Manager; Joe Finnegan, Personnel; Beth Ryder, Human Services Manager; A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk The County Administrator made opening remarks~ The areas to be covered today are, outside agencies, Port and Airport. He advised the Board of the outcome of his meetings with the Constitutional Officers. The Sheriffs Department advised him that they will be cutting their budget by $323,000. this does not include the anticipated return of$100,000. at the end ofthe year. The Clerk of the Circuit Court has reduced her budget by $27,245.00 The Supervisor of Elections has reduced her budget by $12,233.00 The Board requested staff look at the organization of staff at the Civic Center. They have drafted a new organization chart based upon review. They will be eliminating two positions at the Civic Center. The two positions are Maintenance Worker III. This will reduce the budget by $70,504. Total reduction in the budget at this time is $432,982.00. In addition, there are parks projects that were committed and have been added back into the budget. They total $135,000., this amount would be deducted from the $432,982., leaving a balance of $297,982. Two new positions were requested in the proposed budget which were not funded. Economic Planner III at a cost of$44,392 and a Personnel Training Manager (cost not given). Mr. Anderson requested a point of clarification: The Board had agreed to give the county employees a 3% increase across the board. He is requesting this be implemented as of September 27, 1998 due to payroll. Also, there are employees who are at the maximum lc,,:cl in their salaries and this 3% across the board also be given to those employees. . Com. Sattler stated he was not happy with the reduction given by the Constitutional Officers. , It was the consensus ofthe Board to approve the Economic Planner III position. At this time with that position being funded, the balance would be $253,590. \..; ....", r· The County Administrator recommended this balance be placed in reserve which is presently at $2. 7 million. The Board concurred. TAPE 1 I TAB 49/CHAMBER OF COMMERCE Mr. Bobby Klein, President of the Chamber of Commerce, addressed the Board on their requested funding of$150,000.00. Com., Bruhn stated he wanted to be sure they received accountability on the money funded. The Chamber assured the Board they would receive accountability. Com. Barnes stated he would like to fund the Economic Development position with half of the funding from the Chamber's budget and the county fund the other half. It was the consenSllS of the Board (4 to 1) to allocate $150,000 to the Chamber of Commerce. OUTSIDE AGENCIES TAB 48/ ABBIEJEAN RUSSELL The County Administrator advised the Board that he and the Assistant County Administrator had met with Mrs. Carolyn Hartley, Administrator of Abbiej ean ,Russell and Ms. Hays of their Board. One issue that came to the forefront was that Abbiejean was having problems with Medicare billing being submitted improperly. Mrs. Hartley explained the situation and advised the Board they expect to receive $600,000 within the next 90 days. Com. Charles expressed his concern with the past due $300,000 Abbiejean owes the county for health insurance. The County Administrator advised the Board that Mrs. Hartley advised him that aside from the money they owe the county, they also owe a Physical Therapy finn $500,000 and they are paying them $20,000 a month. The County Administrator advised the Board that in all good conscience, he could not recom~end that we continue to keep them in our health insurance program. ." The Personnel Risk Manager advised the Board that through ,May, the county has paid $238,000 in claims and through May their premiums would have bee? $209,000. Their claims are exceeding their premiums. I-Ie advised the Board that in speaking with Nelson Benefits, they would be willing to work with them to try and place them with another insurance. The County Administrator stated that without a business plan or a cash flow projection, we would not know exactly what it would take to bail them out of this situation. , Com. Sattler stated he did not understand how it could go on for 3 years without resolving the problems with the Medicare billing. ' ¡'-. '-' ....,,¡ The County Administrator advised the Board that last year they approved a management study be done ofthe facility. They came back with various recommendations. . Mrs. Hartley advised the Board of the cost savings recommendations which will be implemented. The County Administrator stated that not being able to see a cash flow analysis of when the money will be coming in versus expenditures going out, including paying the co~nty. back, he could not make a recommendation. ' I The M & B Manager advised the Board that they were to be phased out as of last year, instead the county increased the allocation. They are requesting a $300,000 allocation this year. Com. Charles stated he could not see funding them ($300,000) what they requested while they still owe the county $200,000+. Com. Barnes stated his concerns with a facility coming in requesting an increase in allocated funds this year when they were to be phased out last year. He does not see an end in sight and feels it would probably get worse before it gets better. Com. Sattler felt that allocating them the $300,000 would not help the situation they are in, it would only prolong the inevitable. Com. Bruhn stated he was not ready to put people out of Abbiejean Russell's and placed into the State's system. Com. Lewis stated she was still confused on how all this funding would work out. She stated her concern with the balance owed for health insurance. A discussion was held regarding another private entity purchasing and managing the facility. It was the consensus of the Board( 4to 1) to direct staff to return to the Board with a cash flow analysis and also eliminate them fTom our insurance program. A member from the Board of Directors addressed the Board on the actual situation. Com. Bn1hn stated that of all the agencies supported by County Government, this is the one that least bothers him. The County Administrator reviewed the direction given by the Board. 1. To have Reingruber go in and do a cash flow projection analysis 2. Also notify them that they are being eliminated'froin the Insurance Program. TAB 49-2/S0IL AND WATER CONSE~VA~ION This budget reflects a -2% and are requesting funding of$38,880. It was the conSensus of the Board to approve this budget. '-' ....., , J?? ~ -- (!? / -, " .---------- TAB 48/ALI)HA HEALTH SERVICES This agency is requesting $37,751. in funding this year. This is less than last year's budget. It wns the consensus of the Hoard to nlloc~,te $37,751 (:0 (his ngency. TAB 48/COUNCIL ON AGING The 1998 budget for this agency was $140,253. This year tl-iey are requesting $111,971. This reflects a $29,000 decrease. It was the consensuS of the Board to approve this budget. TAB 48/DEAF SERVICE CENTER OF THE TREASURE COAST, INC. This center is requesting operational funding of $7,500 for FY 98/99. The County Administrator advised the Board that they have not set aside any funding for this agency for this new FY. Com. Barnes stated he would approve funding them at the same level as last year which was $5,000. He feels this is an ongoing service that other counties are providing. The representative for the agency addressed the Board on this request. It was the consensus of the Board to allocate $5,000. to this agency. TAB 48/HEALTH DEPARTMENT 1997 year's funding for this agency was $450,000. Thi.s past year they came in at $450,000 and then the Board added $150,000 for new programs. This year, they are requesting $600,000 for the current programs and another $160,000 for new pro'grams, totaling $760,000. Staff is recommending $450,000 which was last year's level before new programs. Com. Sattler stated he would like to fund them at last year's level of $600,000. Com. Charles stated he would like to fund the agency at a level of $450,000. It was the consensus of the Board to allocate $600,000. to this agency. TAB 48/HEALTHY START COALITION OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, INC. The Board has provided match fUl"\ding for prenatal care and the request for FY 98/99 is for a 50% cost reimbursement match contract up to $40,000., It was the consensuS or the ßo~'rd to ~\l~oc~'tc, $40,000. to this ~'gency. TAB 48/LOVE CgNTgR Rl~GENEnATION The County Administrator advised the Board that he has not set aside funds in (he budget for this agency. They have requested $125,000 in funding. I , . \.-; ...., Com. Barnes stated he would like to assist this group and fund them $50,000 and continue to" follow this project. I-Ie felt this was a worthwhile agency. ' Com. Charles sllggested funding them at the level of $42,500. It was the consensus of the Board to allocate $42,500 in funding for this agency. TAB 48/NEW HORIZONS OF THE TREASURE COAST This past year's allocation was $538,295. they have requested a 1 % increase in funding this year which would allocate them $544,039, Com. Barnes, stated he did not wish to increase this budget. It was the consensus of the Board to allocate $653,145 to this agency. TAB 34/PORT AND AIRPORT The Management/Budget Manager reviewed the budget for this department. This budget reflects a -25%. Com. Barnes questioned Airport Expansion noted on the budget which reflects the amollnt of $2,150,000. The Management/Budget Manager addressed Com. Barnes questions. It was the consensus of the Board to appr'ove this budget~ PORT This budget reflects a -17%. ., . It was the conscnsus of the Board to approve this budgct. The meeting was adjourned. , G) --' :..:- OJ r· C 0 0 (") (j) Q) m 3 ;3 Q) 0 - (") C ::r ~ ~ --' -1 --' :;0 (J1 0 w -- 0 0 u]" --' 0- 0- c: c: 0. 0. <0 <0 (1) (1) ~ ro (j) (1) 0. ::J S' (1) - ..., Q) ::r ;::::: (1) (j) » ..., ::;. Q) '"0 ::J 0 éii ;::¡. OJ :;0 c: 0. (1) <0 (J) (1) (1). - <! ~ (1) 0- (J) W --' .¡:.. 0 0 c.o , -- c.o --' c.o --' --' -- 0 0 I 0 (J1 c.o c.o w 0 0 , co 0 0 " 'l1li "" C (f) (f) (f) (f) (f) r "~I 0 - Q.. Q.. Q.. ::r ::r (1) 0 ;:;: ö: ä: ä: (1) (1) (ñ' (J) 3 ro' ..., ..., c: c: ~ ~ ~ ::ij ::ij ..., ..., 3 0 (J) 00 00 (1) CD m - Q) Q) Q) (f) (f) (f) 1J 00 00 00 <! -i - ro - <! <! CD CD (") (") (") 00 00 00 --' .þ. .¡:.. --' --' --' 0 0 0 .¡:.. 0 0 co 0 0 0 0 0 "'T1 0 --' --' Q') -..¡ -..¡ --' --' --' c W N N N --' --' N 0 --' Z --' N N 0 --' --' N 0 --' 0 --' --' 0 .¡:.. co Q') --' (J1 0 ~ ç; r :;0 m OJ 0 ï1 ï1 -Q ~ CD 0. Õ 2: OJ -1 G) ro CD ~ OJ (") õ: -0 » ;0 0 .., .., '" ;::¡. 0 0 Q. '< ï1 (f) :Þ ..., (j) $: (J1 z ~ 0 0 ~. ::J -< -i CD .., c: W ::J ::J Q) 00 0 0 z Q) ...... - 0 ::J (1) 0 -..¡ :Þ 00 .., .., Q.. Q. ..., - c: š:: ro c: ~ <0 m ;0 () --' --' ~ c -.. --' .¡:.. (J1 (J1 0 ;0 w -.. 0 co 0 -.. m ;JJ <.0 "w ""0 ëP ""0 ëP z m 0 0 0 -.. 0 --' c z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -.. m -i ~ m CD --' --' x c -.. --' .¡:.. (J1 (J1 0 1J 0 W -.. 0 co 0 -..¡ m (j) "c.o "w "0 ëP ""0 ëP z m (J) -i 0 0 0 -..¡ 0 --' m m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -..¡ (J) 0 ;0 m (J1 c.o --' Q') c.o Q') -..¡ < "'T1 0 -.. Q') -.. 5J1 co 0 m -< ""0 to <.0 ""0 0 ëP ""0 z 0 0 (J1 N -..¡ 0 -.. 0 c -" 0 co .¡:.. c.o 0 0 0 0 0 m (J) J: -1 0 m c 0 X r -1 1J 0 » Q') c.o --' Q') c.o Q') -..¡ m CD r --' -.. Q') -..¡ (J1 co 0 z m (j! Ù1 <.0 <.0 ""0 ""0 ëP ""0 (J) w (J1 N -.. 0 -.. 0 m 0 co .¡:.. c.o 0 0 0 0 0 (J) --- ;0 ~ U; --' m --' (J1 N c.o --' -..¡ 0 < -..¡ 0 .þ. ~ N (J1 0 0 0 -.. m to ""0 ""0 <.0 ""0. ""0 ""0 ""0 ëP z z c m .¡:.. 0 (J1 -.. N 0 0 0 0 --' m -i .¡:.. 0 co ~ -= 0 0 .8 0 .:::! () J: m :Þ ~ Z ~ U; x (j) 1J N Q') N c.o --' -..¡ 0 m m c.o --' .¡:.. <:;) N (J1 0 0 0 -..¡ z "'.¡:.. Ù1 ""0 <.0 ""0 ""0 ""0 ""0 ëP (J) -.. w (J1 -.. 'N 0 0 0 0 --' m .¡:.. 0 co ~ -= 0 0 .8 0 ~ (J) , ~ (j) "'T1m 1J cz :Þ zm () 0;0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -i :Þ r Z ::r: r r Z ::r: (j) z (j) (1) c3" 0 0 (1) :Q: .., (1) ..., , :E :E :E :E Q) :E Q) ::r (1) (1) ::r ::J ::J , CD (1) - - G) .., .., .., ~ .., ~ 0 ..., ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 õ Q) Q) 0 0 ::J ..., §. (") §. - Q) Q) Q) 0. Q) Q) ;0 co ..., ..., .., .., ...... m -- 0. 0. 0. 0. CD õ' (1) » N + ro ::J - (J) co CD 0 -- ::J 0. 0. 0 ...... Z 0 CD .., (I)' 00 - :Þ$: 2:Q) c: ::J 00'< 3<D' CD 0. ::J CD - ..., 00 ~ - o Q) ..., ::J <00. õ3 ~ ::J Q) -- (J) (1) ~tg -Q) (1) ::J 0._ 0-00 CD Q) Om :E Q) ::J :E ~ ~ 0.0. _(1) o 0. 0-0 (1) ..., 39- Q) Q) 0.::J CD <0 Q) (1) ~o. ~ S -:Þ ::Tc: (1)<0 c.oc: :;:¡~ õQ) 0::J ï10. -<(f) 0(1) --,'"0 OJro c: 3 0.0- <0 (1) ~ ...., ::TQ) æfW ::!. ..., ::J - <p~ ro ::J - Q) - <' CD 0- c: 0. <0 ~ (ñ' '"0 .., (1) '"0 Q) .., (1) po G) ;;0 » z -I » a t... c: en -I m :¡: m oz -;-J-I Wen "'9-n 00 0;;0 -I :I: m_ ~(,',' o .:' ~ OJ c: a G) m -I -- ~ ....,,¡ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: December 5, 2000 Tape: 1-2 Convened: 7:00 p.m Adjourned: 9:50 p.m.. Commissioners Present: Chainnan, Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward, Paula A. Lewis, John D. Bruhn, Cliff Barnes Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director, Dennis Murphy, Assistant Community Development Director, Paul Phillips, Airport Director, Gayla Barwick, Tourism Director, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Jack Southard, Public Safety Director, Pete Keogh, Leisure Services Director, Beth Ryder, Community Services Director, Don West, County Engineer, Bill Blazak, Utilities Director, Roger Shinn, Central Services Manager, Becky Padrick MSBU Coordinator, Deputy Williams, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES(1-025) It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the minutes of the meeting held November 21,2000; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMATION/ PRESENTATION Presentation - Jerome Rhyant, Lover Center Regeneration Ministries, Inc., addressed the Board requesting assistance in funding in the amount of $42, 500. Dr. Alvan Miller, addressed the Board requesting the Board consider this request. . Mr. Rhyant advised the Board that the request is to complete the economic center. Com. Barnes asked if any of the funds would be going toward salaries or operations. Mr. Rhyant stated there are some administrative costs involved in the stage they are in which is only 8 or 10% of the overall budget. 90% of these funds would go to actual construction. He stated these administrative cost are not salaries, but, are for some ofthe labor which is presently being done. The $42,500 is to assist in the completion of phase 1. They are $100,000 away from completion and the balance has been committed by the companies involved, they are 85 % completed in -1- '-' ....,; strúcture. They have received $125,000 to $130,000 from the general community. $100,000 road construction was requested by the city and this amount has been committed and the road will be completed by January. With the road construction, they are at about a $200,000 total cost for the proj ect. Com. Barnes recalled never guaranteeing this organization a certain amount of money and they at that time advised the Board they would not return for additional funds when they were allocated the last funding at the budget sessions. However, he views this project differently than other due to the fact they have requested capital assistance not for operational or salaries. He would like to see the Board give some type of donation for capital purposes only, not salaries or on-going operations for phase 1. He does not wish to re-tract what he has said for years, that being, that the county needs to get out ofthe funding of charitables and non-profits. Com. Coward stated that it was clear that what they are doing for the community is very important, and the matter is a dollar and cents issue. He is concerned about the fact that someone is coming in after the budget process making a special request when there were 50 other agencies that are doing good things for the community and do not come before the Board on an individual basis. He commented on a report which came across his desk, regarding the Law Enforcement Trust Fund and there is some language indicating there are some confiscated dollars that can be distributed at the discretion of the Board. About lO% of these funds are specifically ear-marked for these types of programs. Rather than dipping into general funds which we do not have and will be in a short fall position next year, he would like for the Board to try to find existing dollars in existing programs and re-prioritize them in order to assist these types of programs. He does not want to see this Board approving general fund or contingency dollars for this purpose. Com. Coward suggested working with the in-coming Sheriff, scrutinizing the trust ftmd dollars and find out iftherc is not a morc cflicicnt use for those funds to hclp these types of programs. Mr. Rhyant thanked Com. Coward for his suggestion, however, he requested the Board consider providing them with the funding they requested tonight and putting them in position for next year, and he would then meet with the Sheriff concerning those particular dollars. Com. Lewis stated she too would support looking into this and her only concern was the funding source. She supports the program and would like for staff to find out what could or could not be done and meet with the Sheriff before April. It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Coward, to have staff meet with the Sheriffto detennine what is available and how to access it legally; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. The County Administrator stated he would meet with the out-going Sheriff as well as the in- coming Sheriff for support and try to haye a report to the Board by the 19th of December, 2000. Com. Barnes asked that this be worked on quickly and if they cannot find the solution then the Board would need to tackle this issue. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS None 4. CONSENT AGENDA(1-771) It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the Consent Agenda; with item C~5 and C-7 pulled for further review; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. I -2- ~ "-' 1. WARRANTS LIST The Board approved Warrant List Nos. 8 and 9. 2. PUBLIC WORKS A. Engineering! Agreement Approval- The Board approved the agreements with Jenkins & Charland, Inc., and Kimley- Horn and Associates, Inc., to provide Bridge Evaluation and Design on a continuing basis and authorized the Chainnan to sign the contracts. B. Road and Bridge/Equipment Purchase- The Board approved Equipment Réquest No. EQ 01-211 to purchase a Rotating Laser Level with Sensor Rod in the amount of$895 to replace a broken Laser Level. C. Road and Bridge/Equipment Request No. EQ 01-149- The Board approved the $1,749 increase in budgeted funds for the equipment request to purchase a cement mixer for the Drainage Operations Section. The funds are available from savings on a previously purchased dump truck. D. Final Payment/Ideal Holding Road Paving Project- The Board approved and authorized the Chainnan to sign Change Order No. 2 in th3e amount of($-14,037.71) resulting in a total contract amount of$80,463. 81, accepted the project, released retainage in the amount of $6,941.81, and make final payment to Range Construction Industries in the amount of$17,987.54. E. Road and Bridge/Signalization Improvements- The Board accepted the signalization improvements as constructed at the intersection of Glades Cut Off and Midway Road and authorized payment to the Signal Group in the amount of$139,652.28 and to the FEC for the synchronization agreement in the amount of$4,500 for a total cost of$144,152.28. 3. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Article V Trust Fund Grant in Aid Agreement- The Board approved the Article V Trust Fund Grant in Aid Agreement, and authorized the Chainnan to sign the agreement. B. Acceptance of the FY 00-01 Grant in Aid Agreement for Court Reporting Services to the Ninete,enth Judicial Circuit, St. Lucie county, from the Office of the State Courts Administrator- The Board approved accepting the Grant in Aid Agreement for Court Reporting Services and authorized the Chainnan to execute the agreement. C. Revocable License Agreement/Mary E. Carlton/Ideal Holding Road- The Board approved the Revocable License Agreemel}.t authorized the Chainnan to execute the Agreement, and directed staffto record the document in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. D. Middle Cove Project- St. Lucie CountyNitolo Quit Claim DeedlResolution No. 00-280- The Board approved accepting the Quit Claim Deed, authorized the Chainnan to execute the resolution and directed staff to record the documents in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. E. Title Insurance Services Agreements- The Board approved the agreements with Treasure Coast Abstract and Title Insurance Co., and Community Land Title Corporation and auth.orized the Chainnan to sign the agreements. -3- 12/01/00 FZABWARR FUND 001 001124 001127 001128 001130 001137 001252 001255 001256 001807 101 101002 101003 101210 102 102001 105 107 107002 , 111 112 115 118 120 122 126 139 140 140001 160 183 183001 183002 183004 183106 184202 184803 185001 186 186204 304 316 390 392 401 418 421 441 4':>1 461 471 491 501 505 505001 510 611 625 655 '-" ST. LUCIE COUNTy - BOARD ;,....., ....., WARRANT LIST # 9- 23-NOV-2000 TO 01-DEC-2000 FUND SUMMARy TITLE General Fund FTA USC Section 5307 FY 99/00 National Endowment Humanities Section 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning FY01 TC Community Action Agency FYOOI01 Zora Neala Hurston Dust Tracks Heri Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab Grant Fla Fish and Wildlife Conservation CTD TRIP Grant FY 00/01 Floridian Aquifer Well Monitoring Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option New County Health Building Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar River Park I Fund River Park II Fund Sheraton Plaza Fund Paradise Park Fund The Grove Fund Indian River Estates Fund Southern Oak Estates Lighting Palm Grove Fund Port & Airport Fund Port Fund Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court Domestic Relations Hearing FYOO-03 Ft Pierce Inlet Mgmt Implementation FIND-Ft Pierce Inlet Hydrodynamic SHIP Housing Assistance,FY 00/01 Recycling Operating Fund Recycling & Education Grant FYOO/01 Communication System Fund County Capital Treasure Cove/Ocean Harbor S Cap Ideal Holding Road MSBU Capital Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.Y. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Uti]itiø~ S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund Holiday Pines Utilities Fund Building Code Fund Information Technology Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Service Garage Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Library Insurance Agency Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 214,319.33 18.46 17.32 1,784.99 3,960.40 10.92 336.29 15,006.67 15,260.00 308.51 85,285.86 12,621.05 5,502.90 1,238.62 17,592.80 7,634.57 6,571.26 2,918,339.07 2,270.57 2,540.48 510.53 427.94 687.07 139.31 842.90 109. 34 653.83 12,576.23 5,565.28 3,335.02 1,774.15 533.43 300.00 689.00 6,158.52 5,854.55 2,533.23 10,205.39 485.48 152.28 5,393.30 11,000.00 2,531.26 467.28 1 , 013 , 231. 21 46,566.16 71 0.08 58,658.90 50,927.73 48,604.44 5,839.54 11,439.11 23,501.84 180,790.10 219,153.88 43,151.09 12,050.14 6,673.04 59,551.00 5,164,393.65 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 22,498.94 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,501.38 0.00 0.00 o.ðo 1,887.80 0.00 0.00 6,431. 71 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 629.82 973.57 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 490.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,298.50 0.00 262.91 1,322.60 6,075.15 0.00 2,286.76 0.00 0.00 0.00 53,659.67 '-' ¥ F. County Owned Tax Certificates/Permission to Bid at Tax Deed Sale- the Board approved staff to bid on parcels at the tax deed sale, not to exceed 20% over the assessed value. G. Lot 47, Vikings Landing (Spruce Bluff)- the Board approved and signed the Quit Claim' Deed attached to the November 2, 2000 letter. H. Port St. Lucie Community Redevelopment Agency Interlocal Agreement- The Board approved the Interlocal Agreement and authorized the Chairman to sign the agreement. 1. Extension of Interlocal Agreement- The Board approved the proposed Fifth Extension of the Interlocal Agreement with the St. Lucie County Fire District for use of "funds disbursed under the 2000-2001 Florida Emergency Medical Services Grant, and authorized the Chairman to sign the extension. 4. ADMINISTRATION A. Lobbyist Services- The Board approved entering into an agreement with Ronald L. Book, P.A. and The Rubin Group, Inc., for Lobbyist Services through the end of this fiscal year in an amount not to exceed $67,500 including out of pocket expenses. B. Change Order No. 2/ Smithsonian Institution- "Exploring Marine Ecosystems" Exhibit The Board approved the change order in the amount of $3,275 with Edlund & Dritenbas for Value Engineering Plan Amendments. 5. AGRICULTURE Car Allowance for Fiscal Year 2000-01- This item was pulled. Com. Coward requested the County Administrator review the figures with the Director concerning mileage which he felt were suspect and return to the Board. 6. MOSQUITO CONTROL Queens Island Project- Phase II/Amendment NO.3 to the Federal Grant Agreement- The Board approved the submission ofthe federal grant amendment forms for Queens Island Phase II through the State of Florida, Office of Budget and Grants, extending the project for time in order to complete the previously approved purchases. 7. CENTRAL SERVICES Janitorial Services- This item was pulled. Three Board members felt this needed further review before hiring in house staff. Staffwas directed to go back and look at the possibility of advertising a new RFP or look at the exi~ting proposals to see if could look at the large buildings and come up with a recommendation, in the interim, if we go out for RFP's and cannot award something they are recommending that staff negotiate a 3 month extension to the existing contract under the same terms and conditions within the next two weeks. 8. UTILITIES Agreement Amendment- The Board approved the Third Amendment to the Agreement for Operation and Maintenance and Management Services with Severn Trent Avatar LLC to include Domestic Product Implicit Price Deflator Indexing (consistent with RFP # 98-73) and approved a lump sum payment for 1999 indexing rate of 1.21 % in the amount of$6,868.48. -4- '-" "'-" 9. PUBLIC SAFETY Grant Application- The Board approved signing the four grant applications for submission to the Florida DCA Division of Emergency Management to develop a Wildfire Mitigation Plan for drainage/road improvements in Indian River Estates, for funds to train a Community Emergency Response Team and for 150 portable stalls to house livestock during a disaster at the new Fairgrounds. 10. LEISURE SERVICES A. Grant Application- The Board approved the submission of a grant applicatIon to the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources Museum General Operating Grant Program for operating support for the Historical Museum. B. Final Payment and RetainageÆnvironmental Learning Center Contract No. C 99-05-433- The Board approved final payment and retainage in the amount of$88,165.61 to be paid to Paul Jacquin & Sons. 11. PURCHASING RFP No. 00-098 and RFP No. 00-071/Pouring Rights- The Board approved rescinding the award ofRFP No. 00-071 rejecting all proposals for RFP No. 00-098, and granted permission to advertise a RFPfor Pouring Rights for the South County Stadium and county wide vending machines and fountain drink locations. REGULAR AGENDA 5. PUBLIC WORKS For consideration before the Board are the following 14 resolutions stating the County's intent to use the unifonn method of collecting non-ad valorem special assessments which may be levied by the corresponding municipal service benefit units: A. Resolution No. 00-223/ Oleander Business Park MSBU- It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 00-223; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. Resolution No. 00-224/ Treasure Cove/Ocean Harbor South MSBU- It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 00-224; and, upon roll call, motion carried unaniµIously. C. Resolution No. 00-225/North Lennard Road 1 MSBU It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 00-225; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. D. Resolution No. 00-226/North Lennard Road 2 MSBU- It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 00-226; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. -5- '-' ..." E. Resolution No. 00-227/North Lennard Road 3 MSBU It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 00-227; and, upon roIl calI, motion camed unanimously. F. Resolution No. 00-228/Briargate MSBU It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 00-228; and, upon roIl calI, motion carried unanimously. G. Resolution No. 00-229/Rouse Road MSBU It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 00-229; and, upon roIl calI, motion carried unanimously. H. Resolution No. 00-230/River Branch Estates MSBU It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 00-230; and, upon roIl calI, motion carried unanimously. 1. Resolution No. 00-23l/Indian River Estates MSBU It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 00-231; and, upon roIl calI, motion carried unanimously. J. Resolution No. 00-232/Saeger Avenue MSBU It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 00-232; and, upon roIl caIl, motion carried unanimously. K. Resolution No. 00-233/Echo Street MSBU It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 00-233; and, upon roIl calI, motion camed unanimously. L. Resolution No. 00-234/Brack Road MSBU It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve Resolution No. 00-234; and, upon roIl calI, motion carried unanimously. M. Resolution No. 00-235/ Academy Drive MSBU It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 00-235; and, upon roIl calI, motion carried unanimously. N. Resolution No. 00-236/Sunland qardens MSBU It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 00-236; and, upon roIl calI, motion camed unanimously. -6- - ~ ..." COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT( 1-2040) O. Resolution No. 00-137/ Guardian Self Storage- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution, subject to the cited conditions granting a Conditional Use PennÚ and Major Site Plan Approval for a new 110,450 square foot mini-warehouse and self storage facility. Mr. David Hayes, representing the petitioner, addressed the Board on this request. The Assistant Community Development Director advised the Board of the foIIowing recommended change to condition number one: . As part of the vegetation removal pennitting process, the developer shaH provide for the removal of exotic vegetation found on the project site and shaH provide a detailed plan indicating how the required 561 inches of tree mitigation is to be provided for. In ~he event the developer elect~ to pay the optional tree mitigation fee of $200 per impacted mch/dbh, that fee shall be paId to the County prior to the issuance of any building for any portion of the project. Com. Coward stated he felt that a better site plan design can be made, he is not convinced that every step has been taken to prevent the destruction of the trees. Com. Bruhn stated he would like to see if they could work something out since this developer did come forward to advise the Board that there was a problem as opposed to others who have just taken a tractor and cleared the land. He suggested possibly something in between the $112,000. Com. Coward suggested they do what was done with the Savannas Club Apartments, that is to send this back to the development review committee and say" we want a better product, we think you can do better" . We are only hearing the worst case scenario tonight and he does not like decisions made on that worst case scenario. He felt there were better site plan decisions which can be made based on the tree survey which they admitted was done after the design. Mr. Hayes stated ifthey were to save halfthe trees and pay inch per inch mitigation, they would need to take out the front end corner of the project and not be able to build there, or the north end and not be able to build on those two buildings, which means they would probably have to reduce the viability ofthis project to about 60%. Mr. Hayes commented on the elevational changes which can cause a problem for pine trees. Com. Hutchinson questioned the dates of the application. The Asst. Community Development Dir~ctor advised the Board the applications were filed August 4, 2000 and the code amendments too effect June 13,.2000. Com. Coward requested the code be ver~fied as it relates to violations for the record. The Asst. Community Development Director stated, the violation is a 4 to 1 ratio of replacement trees for what was taken out. The penalty clause is double the regular clause. The Asst. Community Development Director stated that by looking at the landscape plan, he does not see much in the way of existing natives being preserved. Mr. Hayes stated he was going toward the fact that if you save a three inch tree is does not go towards mitigation any how. ' -7- - '-' -..",; Mr. Hayes asked if the Board would consider conditionally approving the site and allow sWI and his client to work together to see if they could come up with something mutually that might be some sort of compromise between and if not they would be back before the Board any how. The County Attorney stated that in looking at the code it is pretty clear that these are requirements and that there are options which have been discussed, they can try to maintain or try to protect some of the existing trees, but they must be above and beyond 3 inches and in order to apply for a credit they can re-plant. They have the option of mitigating off site on county property or paying $200 an inch, but, they have to do one of those things in order to comply with the existing code. There isn't the ability for the Board to simply waive the effective date, this would have to be done by Ordinance. If any action is being taken tonight, it must comply with the code. The County Attorney suggested that it may be appropriate to continue this for a limited period of time, giving the representative time to consult with the client and come to some sort of resolution of the issues. The Board does not have the ability to do what he is asking, the only thing they can do tonight is approve the site plan in confonnance with the code. Mr. Hayes asked for a continuance until January 9th, 2001. Mr. Charles Grande, Hutchinson Island, addressed the Board. He stated he found this to be a strange site plan which did not include the D-Celllane. He stated the D-Celllane gives the applicant the opportunity to move the gate and drastically revise the southeast comer design. He asked that staff work with FDOT on the D-Celllane option. Mr. Hayes stated the D-Celllane would increase the cost and there are other avenues yo~ woul.d get into. He respectfully submits that this would not be the way to go for many reasons mcludmg the fact that it would not save mitigation. Mr. Hayes advised the Board that in a pre-application meeting with the FDOT, this was one of the options discussed and they asked that they do not do a D-Celllane. Com. Coward requested more infonnation be presented regarding FDOT's opinion on the D-Cell lane at the next meeting. It was the consensus of the Board to continue this public hearing until January 9, 2001 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY (2-0928) St Lucie County Cultural Affairš Council- Consider ~ta.ff recommendation ~o app~int ~ne of' the persons nominated by the Coun~il to till the eXlSt~ng vacancy on the ounCl, an to reappoint Bob Russell to the CouncIl for a second four year tenn. . d d 'b Com Bruhn to approve the reappointment of Bob It was moved by Com. LewIs, secon e . y : ' Russell; and, upon roll call, motion carned unammously. Also, after tallying the vote for the second nomination, it was the consensus ofthe Board to nominate Mr. James Dunn. A. -8- -- -- ~ ....., B. Letter ofIntent- Mirabella Yachts, Inc., - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Letter ofIntent. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the letter of intent. and upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. , , C. . Petroleum Products Corp., Superfund Site De Minimis Settlement Offer, Pembroke Park, Florida - Consider staff recommendation to approve Option 2 and authorize the Chainnan to sign the signature page. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. D. Ordinance No. 00-41- Amending Plan for Tourist Development- Consider staff recommendation to grant pennission to advertise Ordinance No. 00-41 and direct staffto agenda the proposed ordinance before the Tourist Development Council for review and comments before the public hearing on the proposed ordinance. Com. Coward requested other projects be included and a workshop be scheduled to discuss the options and the Board discuss the use ofthe 3rd cent for other capital projects to promote tourism. Com. Barnes requested the Sunrise theater be included in the list. The County Attorney stated he wiII hold off on the advertising untii the Board worksession has taken place. 7. LEISURE SERVICES (2-1630) NY Mets Admission Price Increase- Consider staff recommendation to consider the proposed price adjustments submitted by the NY Mets: 2000 Spring Training Proposed 200 I Spring Training Lower Reserved Upper Reserved Upper Reserved (Last 5 rows) General Admission 6.00 (Bleachers) Thcre will be a minimum of one bleacher seating area per game, offering the same $6.00 price as in 2000. .. d ofthe new mentorlng program at St. Lucie West The Mets representative advised the Boar t h table being placed prior to every ball Middle School this comin~ season a.~ ~~ll ~ ~ ;~e~~~Pprogram will continue 7 days a week game where two players will be aVal a e. a beginning in February. C B hn stated he was in opposition to the increase and stated his concern that the Mets may coo:~ ba~k at the end ofthe season and say their attendance was low. econded b Com. Lewis, to approve staff recommendation; It was moved by Com. Coward, s . ~ . B hn Aye's: Lewis, Coward, Barnes, and, upon roll call, the v~te was as follows. ay, ru , Hutchinson, motion carned by a vote of 4 ,to 1. $ 13.00 9.00 7.50 $ 15.00 10.00 10.00 6.00 -9- - - '-' v 8. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (2-2177) A. Grant AcceptancelPursuit Boats (S2 Y ht) C . the $340,000 grant award ftomthe Sta~C o:FI-on.odnasoId£:; sta£ffTreco~mendation to accept E . D lIce 0 ounsm Trade and .con~mIC evelopment on behalf of Pursuit Boats Business, authoriz~ the Chainnan t . . SIgn t .e agreement beh:een the County and OTTED , approve Resolution No 00-274 0 acceptmg the future mamtenance and other attendant costs for the project and' Budget Resolution No. 00-273 to appropriate and expend the grant funds. approve It was moved by Com. Coward: seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recommendation' and, upon roll call, motIon earned unanimously. , B. Resolu.tion No. ~O-136- A-I Roof Truss- Consider staff recommendation t~ approve the resolutIOn, grantmg Major Site Plan Approval for a new 151 900 Sq foot manu.t'; t . plant. , . lac unng Mr. Gregg Boggs, representative for the petitioner, was available to answer any questions the Board may have. , It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 00-136; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 9. PUBLIC WORKS(2-2288) Unsafe Building/7590 S. US 1 Port St. Lucie- Consider staff recommendation to declare the building located at 7590 S. US I, Port St. Lucie, Florida, unsafe, pursuant to the provisions of Article III of Chapter 2-5 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Las, and that the Board hold a public hearing on February 6,2001 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible, to take such further action as is appropriate under Article III of Chapter 2-5 of the Code. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Lewis to continue this issue; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. ADMINISTRATION A-I. REORGANIZATION- The Board discussed the Annual Reorganization of November 21,2000. It was the consensus of the Board to re-appoint the following: Workforce Development - Com. Bruhn volunteered to replace Com. Lewis Expressway Authority- Com. Bruhn will replace Com. Barnes Lake Okeechobee Coaliti~n- the Board will continue to alternate attending the meetings. There being no further business to be br~ught before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:50 p.m. Chainnan Clerk of Circuit Court -10- ~ ,-' ~ AGENDA REOUEST I~\1NO. A· ( DATE: December 19,2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: Board of County Commissioners PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Heather Young Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution Nos. 00-289 and 00-290 - Amending Administrative Fee for Grants, Special Dependent Districts and Enterprise Funds BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum CA 00-2017 FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/ A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt proposed Resolution Nos. 289 and 290, as drafted. ~] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: E: COMMISSION ACTION: D u as Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: y Review and ApVfovals Management & Budget: vfY\~ Other: Purchasing: Originating Dept. (\11) \ F;,_ (C1=k "",,"py '",y, i"PPIi""'~ Other: '-" ...",; INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County. Commissioners FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 00-2017 DATE: December 14,2000 SUBJECT: ResolutionNos. 00-289 and 00-290 - Amending Administrative Fee for Grants, Special Dependent Districts and Enterprise Funds BACKGROUND: Pursuant to Resolution No. 94-206, the County currently charges a five percent (5%) administrative fee against the total operating expenses of special dependent districts and enterprise funds. A five percent (5%) administrative fee is also charged against grants. These fees are intended to reimburse the General Fund for administrative, legal and budgetary support provided by the Board of County Commissioners. In instances involving repair and/or reconstruction projects following a declared state of emergency, such fees may result in an adverse impact on the department overseeing the project, enterprise fund and/or special dependent district. A recent example is the FEMA reimbursement received by the Mosquito Control District for repair work following the 1999 hurricanes. In that instance, the administrative fee under the current policy would be one hundred twenty-nine thousand nine hundred fifty-two and 23/100 dollars ($129,952.23). Attached to this memorandum are copies of proposed Resolution No. 00-289 which would amend Resolution No. 95-25 to pennit the County Administrator to waive or reduce the administrative fee for a grant funding a repair and/or reconstruction project following a declared state of emergency if the fee will cause an adverse effect on the budget of a department overseeing the project. For purposes of clarification, the resolution also provides for deletion of the reference to the St. Lucie County Port and Airport Authority which was abolished in 1998. A copy of proposed Resolution No. 00-290 is also attached to this memorandum. The proposed resolution would amend Resolution No. 94-206 to permit the County Administrator to waive or reduce the administrative fee for a repair and/or reconstruction project following a declared state of emergency if the fee will cause an adverse effect on an enterprise fund and/or a special dependent district. -1- '-" """'" CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt proposed Resolution Nos. 289 and 290, as drafted. Attachments HY/ Copies to: Respectfully submitted, ~~ Heather Young Assistant County Attorney County Administrator Finance Director Management and Budget Manager Grants Coordinator Deputy Clerk -2- '-' -..".,I RESOLUTION NO. 00-289 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 95-25 TO PROVIDE FOR WAIVER OR REDUCTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE FEE FOR GRANTS FUNDING REPAIR AND/OR RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS FOLLOWING A DECLARED STATE OF EMERGENCY WHEREAS, on January 10, 1995, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, adopted Resolution No. 95-25 which established an administrative fee for grants for operating and capital expenditures; and, WHEREAS, the County and its dependent taxing districts periodically receive grants for repair and/or reconstruction projects following a declared state of emergency; and, WHEREAS, the administrative fee for such grants may result in an adverse effect upon the budget of the department overseeing the repair and/or reconstruction funded by such grants; and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that it is in the best interests of the County and its dependent taxing districts to amend Resolution No. 95-25 to provide for the waiver or reduction the administrative fee charge for grants received to repair and/or reconstruct to public ally owned property and facilities following a declared state of emergency; and, WHEREAS, Resolution No. 95-25 provides for the administrative fee to be charged against grants received by the St. Lucie Port and Airport Authority; and, WHEREAS, the St. Lucie County Port and Airport Authority was abolished by special act of the Florida Legislature pursuant to Chapter 98·497, Laws of Florida; and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioner has further determined that it is appropriate to amend Resolution No. 95-25 to delete reference to the Port and Airport Authority. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, as follows: 1. Resolution No. 95-25 is hereby amended as follows: A. Paragraph 2 shall be amended to read as follows: 2. The Administrative Fee will be five percent (5) of the total grant for all grants administered by the '-" ...., Board of County Commissioners, the Mosquito Control District Board, and the Erosion District Board, and the Environmental Control District Board. These fees will cover all operating and capital expenditures. B. Paragraph 4 shall be amended to read as follows: 4. The Administrative Fee may be waived or reduced at the discretion of the Office of Management and Budget if the fee will cause an adverse effect on the funded program/project or limitations of the grant specification or requirements. The Administrative Fee for a grant funding a repair and/or reconstruction project following a declared state of emergency may be waived or reduced at the discretion of the County Administration if the fee will cause an adverse effect on the budget of the department overseeing the project. 2. and effect. All other terms and conditions of Resolution No. 95-25 shall remain in full force 3. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. Mter motion and second, the vote on this Resolution was as follows: Chair Frannie Hutchinson Vice Chairman Doug Coward Commissioner John D. Bruhn Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Cliff Barnes xx XX XX XX XX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this XX day of XX, 2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney g:\atty\resoltn \2000\00-289. wpd ~ """" RESOLUTION NO. 00-290 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 94-206 TO PROVIDE FOR WAIVER OR REDUCTION OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE FEE CHARGED TO SPECIAL DEPENDENT DISTRICTS AND/OR ENTERPRISE FUNDS FOR REPAIR AND/OR RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS FOLLO~NG A DECLARED STATE OF EMERGENCY WHEREAS, on October 4, 1994, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, adopted Resolution No. 94-206 which established a policy of administrative fees for enterprise funds and special dependent districts; and, WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 94-206, a Administrative Fee equal to five percent (5%) of the total operating expense of the district and enterprise funds; and, WHEREAS, in some instances, payment of the Administrative Fee may cause an adverse effect on the budget for a repair and/or reconstruction project paid by monies from a special dependent district or an enterprise fund following a declared state of emergency; and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that it is in the best interests of the County and its special dependent taxing districts to amend Resolution No. 94- 206 to provide for waiver or reduction of the administrative fee charge for such repair and/or reconstruct projects following a declared state of emergency. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, as follows: 1. Resolution No. 94-206 is hereby amended by adding Paragraph 6 to read as follows: 6. The Administrative Fee for a repair and/or reconstruction project using Special Dependent District and/or Enterprise Fund monies following a declared state of emergency may be waived or reduced at the discretion of the County Administration if the fee will cause an adverse effect on the budget of the Special Dependent District and/or the Enterprise Fund. 2. effect. All other provisions of Resolution No. 94-206 shall remain in full force and 3. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. · . '-' "'wII Mter motion and second, the vote on this Resolution was as follows: Chair Frannie Hutchinson Vice Chairman Doug Coward Commissioner John D. Bruhn Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Cliff Barnes xx XX XX XX XX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this XX day of XX, 2000. ATTEST: Deputy Clerk g: \atty\resoltn \2000\OO-290.wpd BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney '-' .....,¡ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. J. A DATE: December 19, 2000 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [ ] TO: Board of County Commissioners PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-286 - Proclaiming December 19, 2000 through December 26, 2000 as "AUDUBON BIRD COUNT WEEK" in St. Lucie County, Florida. BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/ A PREVIOUS BOARD ACTION: , RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 00-286 as drafted. [2g APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Do g sAnderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: ~7t ,v Review and Approvals Management & Budget: Leisure Services: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: '-" ...., RESOLUTION NO. 00-286 A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING DECEMBER 19, 2000 THROUGH DECEMBER 26, 2000, AS "AUDUBON BIRD COUNT WEEK" IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. This year, the St. Lucie Chapter of The Audubon Society will again conduct its annual bird count on Saturday, December 16, 2000. 2. It was previously believed that the annual bird count began locally in 1957. However, last year St. Lucie's Audubon President, Judy Gersony located records of a St. Lucie bird count rrom 1917. 3. This past year, St. Lucie's Audubon Society has held monthly programs for members and visiting birders, followed by field trips to the best birding areas in the County. Audubon also nominated several of these areas for the first section of Florida's "Great Birding Trail", which literally put St. Lucie County "on the map" for birders internationally to include in their birding trips. 4. St. Lucie Audubon Society also worked this year with Jim Holmes and WQCS to produce a local birding radio spot called "The Treasure Coast Birder: A Guide to the Birds in your Backyard". 5. St. Lucie Audubon Society also discovered that an island on the St. Lucie River was used last Spring by several birds of several species for their nesting season and arranged for numerous weekly water "field" trips that amazed and delighted birders from all over Florida and beyond. '-" ....., 6. St. Lucie Audubon Society also sponsored birding classes in the County this year, attended by County residents and several tourists visiting the area. Next spring, the Florida Ornithological Society will hold their annual spring convention in St. Lucie County, once again injecting thousands of "birding" dollars to the local economy. 7. Annually, wildlife appreciation, in large part bird enthusiasts, generate an economic return of $20 billion each year. $1 billion is spent annually on bird seed, feeders, baths and nesting boxes. 8. The average birder annually spends more than $350 on travel and paraphernalia related to birdwatching. Active birders annually spend about $2,000 on birdwatching, with half on travel. 9. In 1991, 24 million Americans took trips for the express purpose of viewing and photographing wild birds. They spent $2.5 billion on trip-related expenses, including $1.5 billion on food and lodging. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board does hereby proclaim December 19 through 26, 2000, as "ST. LUCIE COUNTY AUDUBON SOCIETY BIRD COUNT WEEK" in St. Lucie County, Florida. 2. St. Lucie County is grateful to the local Audubon Chapter for helping our community realize the potential economic benefit which birding can be for our County. ~ """" PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 19th day of December, 2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY '" '-' """'" §}~ ~OOl 12/07/00 10:58 FA-I 1 561 465 5658 LEVINE & VI"YNER To: Diane 12n 100 From: T.A. Wyner Sorry I cou\dn~t find you yesterday when I was in the County building for the Code Enforcement Board meeting (which went past NooN). ' What fonows is information on the Iequest by St. Lucie Audubon Society to bave the week of December 19th proclaimed "St. Lucie Audubon Bird Count Week''', to be on the agenda of the Dec. 19th (or 12th if better for you) County Commission meeting. Call anytime if more information is needed (465-5658). I win have an Audubon representative at either meeting to accept the proclamation. Thanks again for accepting this late request. As 1 explained to you, norma1ly we make this request in November, this year, however, we were uncertain if we could get the count done" due to the serious illness of a key vo1unteer. With the help of folks like you, St. Lucie Audubon will continue the tradition this year, beg\Ul as early as 1917. f (^/~ VJ\ ~ \)9;0 \ / D:X-3 ( úl(ioS'~ +u ( {)czc lq ? ÙL~ ..L. _ '." '.' v .... V . <oJ ...i j. .. ......... .... ...i v.L. .~ ...J ~.) 'oJ V .J 'J J...¡J:. \ .L....i..c., \JrÕ fI j, ..~..:.í\ '"t:::J .....V'. ~ '-tII ~ This YeaT The St. Lucie Chapter of The Audubon Society will again conduct its annual bird COWlt on Saturday, December 16, 2000. It was previously believed tbat 1he annual bird count began locally in 1957. However, last year St. Lucie~s Audubon president" Judy Gersony located records of a St. Lucie bird count from 1917. This past year St. Lucie" s Audubon Society has held monthly programs for members and visiting birders, followed by field hips to the best birding areas in the County. Audubon also nominated several of these areas fOI tbe first section of Florida's ¡;¡;Great Birding Trail"., which literally put St. Lucie County "on the map" for birders internationally to include in their birding trips. St. Lucie Audubon Society also worked this year with Jim Ho1mes and WQCS to produce a Ioea1 birding radio spot called "The Treasure Coast Birder: A Guide to The Birds in Your Backyard". St. Lucie Audubon Society also discovered that an island on the 81. Lucie River, was used last Spring by several birds of several species for their nesting season and arranged for numerous weeldy water "fie1d~~ trips that amazed and delighted birders Horn all over Fla. and beyond. St. Lucie Audubon Society also sponsored birding classes in the County this year, attended by County residents and several tourists visiting the area. Next Spring, the Fla. Ornithological Society will hole their annual Spring convention in St. Lucie County. once again injecting thousands of'·bir~ dol1ars to tbe local economy. As !he County Commission has done fot' several years, we ask that you once agam proc.laim "AuduhonBird Count Week" (Dec. 19-26,2000). YO\lf proclamation acknowledges tbe Commissioners' recognition of the "ferble investmentn birding is to our County. fÝhß ~ ~~( - 12/07/~0~.u.\.0..iU..~JAX 0\. 561, i6t,5658 LP.VTNE & WVNPR , ",~' ,.... ....f-If-I.¡."""""".u,...(Iü~.L..I.Ï -~a:.i.b- 1;'---" V'.&..&._ ~ '. enthusiasts, -g~erates an economic reb!etn of $20 billion each year.. $1 billion is spent annually on bird seed, feeders, baths and nesting boxes.(USDI Survey 1993) , The average birder annually spends more than $350 on travel and paraphernalia related to birdwatching. Active birders annually spend about $2,000 on birdwatching, with half on travel.(Wiedner and Kerlinger, 1990) In 1991~ 24 million Americans took trips for the express purpose of viewing and photographing wild biIds. They spent $2.5 billion on trip-related expenses, including $1.5 billion on food and lodging.. (USDI Survey, 1993) Thanks in advance for supporting the effort of dozens of St.. Lucie Audubon volunteers to continue the annual bird count for another 100 years. .... f4¡ 003 ,..-, f1 _ ~ AGENDA REQUEST -."..I ITEM NO. SA DATE: December 19, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [ ] TO: EROSION DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION PRESENTED BY: \ ~ .E. SUBJECT: South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration Special Asses ment District Public Hearing Stating the County's Intent to Use the Uniform Method of Collecting Non-Ad Valorem Special Assessments BACKGROUND: See Attached Memorandum FUNDS AVAIL. N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: November 21, 2000 - Board granted permission to advertise the Public Hearing RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 00-004 stating the County's intent to use the uniform method of collecting non-ad valorem special assessments for the South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration Special Assessment District. þc] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: RRENCE: COMMISSION ACTION: Do g sAnderson Cou ty Administrator [X]County Attorney: [X]Public Works Dir: Ji/ ~~/ Coordination/Sianatures []Management & Budget: [ ] purchas ing: [ ] Other: [] Finance (Info Copy Only): '-" -."",I COMMISSION REVIEW: December 19, 2000 ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 00-408 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Erosion District Board of Commissioners Donald B. West, County Engineer December 7, 2000 South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration Special Assessment District Public Hearing - Stating the County's Intent to Use the Uniform Method of Collecting Non-Ad Valorem Special Assessments BACKGROUND The Board is considering the creation of the South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration Special Assessment District for beach restoration along South Hutchinson Island. One of the funding methods available for the subject projects is through non-ad valorem special assessments levied on properties within the proposed SAD and collected using the uniform method pursuant to Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes. In order to preserve this funding option, it is necessary for the Board to adopt a resolution for the proposed SAD at a duly advertised public hearing held prior to January 1, 2001 . The resolution does not in any way obligate the County to levy the special assessment, rather it simply preserve's the County's option to use the uniform method of collection if special assessments are levied. Attached to this memorandum is Resolution No. 00-004 which satisfies the legal requirement. RECOMMENDA TION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 00-004, stating the County's intent to use the uniform method of collecting non-ad valorem special assessments for the South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration Special Assessment District. cc: Staff Concurring Finance Director Interim OMS Manager Tax Collector Property Appraiser '-'" ....,¡ RESOLUTION NO. 00-004 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT STATING ITS INTENT TO USE THE UNIFORM METHOD OF COLLECTING NON-AD VALOREM SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED BY THE PROPOSED SOUTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND BEACH RESTORATION SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT; DESCRIBING THE AREA SUBJECT TO THE ASSESSMENT; STATING A NEED FOR THE LEVY; PROVIDING FOR MAILING THE RESOLUTION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Board of Commissioners of St. Lucie County Erosion District (the "Board") is contemplating the creation of the South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration Special Assessment District (the "SAD") to fund the cost of a project to provide beach restoration improvements to properties within the boundaries of the SAD (the "Project") in St. Lucie County; and WHEREAS, the Board, as the governing body of the SAD, intends to use the uniform method for collecting non-ad valorem special assessments to fund the cost of the Project as authorized by Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes because this method will allow the special assessments to be collected annually commencing in November 2001, in the same manner as provided for ad valorem taxes; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2000 the Board held a duly advertised public hearing to consider the adoption of this resolution, proof of publication of this hearing is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". -1- '-'" -....I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Commissioners of St. Lucie County Erosion District, as follows: Section 1: Commencing with the 2001-2002 Fiscal Year and with the tax statement mailed for the 2001-2002 Fiscal Year, the Board intends to use the uniform method of collecting non-ad valorem assessments authorized in Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes for collecting non-ad valorem assessments levied by the South Hutchinson Island Special Assessment District to fund the cost of a project to provide beach restoration improvements to properties within the boundaries of the proposed SAD. A description of the boundaries of the real property within the proposed SAD and subject to the levy is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "B". Section 2: The Board hereby determines that the levy of the assessments are necessary to fund the cost of the Project. Section 3: Upon adoption, the County Attorney is hereby directed to send a copy of this resolution by United States mail to the Florida Department of Revenue, and the St. Lucie County Property Appraiser and Tax Collector. Section 4. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. -2- '-' ...., PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 19th day of December, 2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT By: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney -3- '-' '-' EXHIBIT A -4- ¥ ....., EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION: SOUTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND BEACH RESTORATION SAD ALL THAT PART OF SECTIONS 9, 15, 16, 21, 22 AND 27, T-36-S, R-41-E AND SECTIONS 2, 3, 11 AND 12, T-37-S, R-41-E, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPT ALL RIGHT OF WAYS OF RECORD. -5- EXHIBIT "B " '-' ....., ------- ---- NORTHERN LIMITS OF BOUNDARY :x: ~ ~I I ~I a.. 1 ~I 01 ~I I I I I I I I I I I ~ So. -j:. V /. ("" V "t- /. ./ "t- O -, ....... ........ '''- - - -+- - _... ,-.. '- - I I ~ /\ C} ~ ~ '-t- ./ V "t- 21 L ('" ?J L _ _ _ _ _ _..+.., _......_.. i ! I \ o (' "% (:) ?J ./ I ¡ I I ! _... -1- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~~~4~ ~~T__~ I I ~I o (/)1 ~I I ~I ZI ~I ------f- 12 ST. LUCIE / MARTIN CO." INE SOUTHERN LIMITS OF BOUNDARY WfE s N.T.S. ....... (ì o (ì ('" V "t- .-fJ2 ~'tI1 so~~TëHINS-;Ñ' IS~D B~~;rrB'ÕARD-OF COUÑTY" COMMÏSSÏÜÑË"RS! :-:-.. .........:-....r : --¡r..'-'....-R....·'Ëv.....nrT'õ....ïïf'g-'- ! . ê:! RESTORATION PROJECT I¡ SAINT LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ¡ - !>SA '11<10'212000'; . ~..,¡ ot;; ¡ PUBLIC WORKS DEPT., ENGINEERING DMSION, .. .. .:; I Z ¡on, ¡ M.S.B.U. SECTION i .. . .. It"- -- ....-..--....-..............-..--+- .-0 i~"'¡! ¡ 2300 VIRGINIA AVE.. FORT PIERCE. FLORIDA 34982 ¡ ,: . i I i TELEPHONE 4 6 2 - 1 7 0 7 ! DRAWING 0 0 J J .. D W ç ¡: --, - ..... - ~ AGENDA REQUEST ....,.¡ ITEM NO. 5B DATE: December 19, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY{DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 PRESENTED BY: SUBJECT: Briargate M.S.B.U. 2nd Public Hearing Potable Water Improvements - F.P.U.A. "'\. BACKGROUND: See Attached Memorandum FUNDS AVAIL. N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: February 8, 2000 - Board accepted the petition and granted permission to advertise the Initial Public Hearing. March 7, 2000 - Initial Public Hearing held. Board created MSBU and authorized County Engineer to proceed with project. April 18, 2000 - Board approved the Interlocal Agreement with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and the City of Fort Pierce. November 14, 2000 - Board granted permission to advertise 2nd Public Hearing RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 00-285 to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the Briargate MSBU; approve the attached preliminary assessment roll; and authorize the County Engineer to proceed with construction of the Project COMMISSION ACTION: CE: [ 21 APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Do sAnderson County Administrator [x]County Attorney [x]PubIiC Works Dir [x ]Finance--AMA Ýf ~., 11 tJ<U CoordlnatlonlSlanatures [x ]Mgt. & BUdge~ [X ]Co. Eng [ ]Purchasing [ ]Other - \wi -....I COMMISSION REVIEW: December 19, 2000 ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 00-411 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Donald B. West, County Engineer DATE: December 7,2000 SUBJECT: Briargate MSBU 2nd Public Hearing - Potable Water Improvements - F.P.U.A. BACKGROUND: The property owners of the Briargate Subdivision petitioned St. Lucie County to establish a Municipal Service Benefit Unit (M.S.B.U.) to fund the costs necessary in bringing potable water improvements to their subdivision. The water system would be owned, constructed and maintained by the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority. The initial petition received represented eighty-two (82%) percent in support of the project. The Briargate Subdivision is located off of Jenkins Road between Okeechobee Road and Edwards Road and lies within the unincorporated limits of the County. On October 10, 2000, the property owners were notified by mail of their tentative assessment and that a second informal meeting would be held on October 26, 2000 to further discuss the project. The notification also stated that the County Engineer would proceed directly to the Second Public Hearing recommending adoption of the assessment roll and to commence construction of the project. The second informal meeting was held with County staff and FPUA representatives on hand to discuss the construction layout and design of the water system, the method of assessment, and the tentative assessment amount. Based upon the consensus of those present, the property owners which to proceed with construction of the project and the levy of the assessments. The method of assessment is based upon the "Equivalent Residential Connection" (ERC) method, which means an equal charge per residential dwelling unit. The total assessment is $36,176.00 excluding interest. The Project will be financed through the County's In-house Loan Program for a period of ten (10) years, beginning November, 2001. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 00-285 to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the Briargate MSBU; approve the attached preliminary assessment roll; and authorize the County Engineer to proceed with construction of the Project cc: Staff Concurring OMS Manager Finance Director Tax Collector Property Appraiser C\J C\J C\J C\J C\J '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t C'5c<5C'5C'5C'5 COd>Cõa;o;Cõ åiÅiiiiiÅii c: o 0. ;::¡ o Q Q) .c:. - .... Q) > o ::::!( o ..... <;;j <;;j C'5 C'5 Cõèõ iiii C1iC1iC1iC1iC1iC1i èõ Cõ ro èõ ;¡;¡;¡;¡ ~~~~~~~~ gggggggg ",,,,,,,"''''''''''<1t ~~~~~~~ en .... ctI Q) >, õ ..... ....., ...... c: ;::¡ o Q (j) '5 f::: f::: f::: f::: f::: ¡::: o.:i o.:i o.:i o.:i cO o.:i 0;:) 0;:) 0;:) ro 0;:) ro C\J C\J C\J C\J C\J C\J ~~~~~~ c: $ ~ "0 Q) "0 'S: '5 I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- C\J C\J C\J C\J C\J C\J C\J ~~~~~~~ C\J C\J C\J C\J C\J C\J C\J wwwwwww ...... :ë § x 0 ctI Q - (j) 0'5 - '<t:ë <=! x >,ctI .0::: "00 Q)- 'ã.~ +:;'<t - (j) ~.2 0. enOO(j) Q) Q) (]) (]) (]) (]) --- c: c: c: . 000 C\I ._ .- .- <=!t5õõ >,.5!2 .5!2 .5!2 .0000 "OQQQ Æ~~~ .9- C\I C\I C\I en :!:::(j)(j)(j)(]) ;::¡ ;::¡ :::! ;::¡ (]) Eëiëiëi- """:"":,..j .... ....c (j)(j)(j)ii)ii).Q ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ Q)Q)(])Q)( ).::!;! +oJ.......... ................. ..... - c:c:c:cco .- .- .- .- .- Q "0"0"0"0"0 X ~11a11a11a11a,g¡ =====\- ,g¡,g¡,g¡,g¡,g¡o en "is.. "i5.. 'õ.. 'õ.. 'õ.. ::; "0 ctI ctI ctI ctI ctI 0' 9- QQQQQC\I '-' (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) Q) ;::¡ ;::¡ ;::¡ ;::¡ ;::¡ ;::¡ ;;; ëiëiëiëiëiëi -~ 00 00 00 00 00 00 "" Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)Q) .~ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ .æ ~ Ì5.. ( )Q)( )( )Q)(]) ctI 0. ..!Ii»»» Q) « ( )~~~~~~ >, .2:' 8,þ';;,þ-þl:;l:; ~ .... ctI.~ .~.~.~.~.~ .... (]) o.CC:C:C:C:C: (]) g- en ..... 'Ë "Ë1lš"ë lf~ 'Ë ~ è:2~~~~~.~~ "0 E Q ( ) () () () () 0 () .§ .ÊL~ ~ <ï5 ü5 ü5 ü5 u5 u5 õS '§ "01'iii5(j)(j)(j)(j)(j)(j)eE (]).,þ ;::¡:::!;::¡;::¡;::¡;::¡ ctI ctI .S:: ,,~ 16 ëi ëi ëi ëi ëi ëi 0. ,..j ,g¡'ES:: "0 00 u:i ¡¡) 00 00 00 (¡¡ ~ ",C) .... ~>..................................... a.. \U 0"0 ,,- (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) (j) E ctI"Ooooooo1::(j) c: _QQQQQQQ)(j) gg¡¡ß-æ-æ(ij-æ(ijcrJE¡g a:s_L.,.~.;t::....:t::::!:::::t::±::(fJ(j) E 0. $0. 0. 0. 0. 0. 0. (j) CO .... -c: ctI ctI ctI ctI CO ctI (]) o ;g ,,- .... Q Q Q Q Q Q (j) õS '+-(1)"'0-......."*""'10+-'+-"'+-........(/)0 .S:: 0 Q) 0 0 0 0 0 0 C(j .... .... ~ &:1. E E E E E E crJ ~ ~C(jctl;::¡;::¡:::!;::¡;::¡;::¡;::¡- 3::!:::::!::::(j)(j)(j)(j) (j)(j)cctl oo.o.Q)Q)Q)Q)(])Q)C:õ C(jctl.c:..c:..c:..c:..c:..c:.C(j- ~O()"""''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''(Jj(J) i.!:!1.!:!1.!:!1.!:!1.!B..!B..!B..!B.crJ(ij 0.C(jC(jC(jC(jC(jC(jC(jC(j;::¡;::¡ e5-5-5-5-5-5-5-5-SS c... . UJ .. L!J L!J L!J L!J UJ L!J L!J -- .-.....-~...-.....-.-..,,-.....,....--....-..o,- ..... C\lC')'<t I.() (o!"-co m.......... ----"-""~~'--'_-.------ '" '" '" '" (J) '" '" '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t <Ò <Ò <Ò <Ò <ò <ò qj C\J C\J C\J C\J (\ C\J C\J ~¡;;~~¡;~~ - (j) (]) .... Q) - .£: ro 0;:) C\J C\J N N 0;:) 0;:) ~ .,.... crScrS ww ro 0;:) 0;:) ro C\J C\J C\J C\J N N N N 0;:) 0;:) 0;:) 0;:) .,.... .,.... crScrS w w - o $ C(j ..... .,.... crScrS w w OOOOOÕ NNNNNN 0;:) 0;:) 0;:) 0;:) 0;:) 0;:) WWWWWW I'- I'- I'- I'- C\J C\J C\J C\J gggg .,..- .,- ".... .,- crScrScrScrS WWWW 8888 c<5C'5C'5crS I'- I'- I'- " ~r~roro .. ,~ Ñ Ñ wwww 1/1 õO a::: UI ,-,-,..-,-.,-.,-.,-"....,.....,..-,...... ~~§~ 0098 .,....~~~~ ªE§ó u, (j) u, (j) tbtbLb·J, pq~ P5 P5 C\J C\J C\J C\J ...., « 1.1) 1.1) ~ « -> ¡¡) 9..JCCUl «e¡«~ ::;¡:o::;¡::r: .¡¡) CCw We¡ ¥ CJ CC - « CC Il. CD .~ .c:. Q E 3: ¡...: en w a: w I- ~ Q Z <C ....I <C c... Õ z æ c... Ll.- e en I- z L!J ::æ ....I ....I <C I- en ~ ....I <C :J " W ~ W ....I !XI <C > <C c... W !XI ....I ....I <C J: en I- z w ::æ en en w en en <C W l- e z ÕJ I- m :f x W d o co Õ (]) - C(j ..... - (j) (]) ..... Q) - .£: c: C(j - C(j '-' -....I RESOLUTION NO. 00-285 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA: DETERMINING THAT THE PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE BRIARGA TE MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT TO FUND THE COST OF A PROJECT TO PROVIDE POTABLE WATER IMPROVEMENTS TO PROPERTIES WITHIN THE BRIARGATE MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT ARE JUST AND RIGHT; APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL BASED ON THE EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION METHOD OF ASSESSMENT; LEVYING A NON-AD VALOREM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ON THE REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE BRIARGATE MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT BASED ON THE APPROVED ROLL; AUTHORIZING COLLECTION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BY THE UNIFORM METHOD OF COLLECTION; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING TO PROCEED WITH THE PROJECT AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, on March 7,2000, based on the petition of eighty-two (82%) percent of the landowners pursuant to Chapter 1-13.5 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances (the "Code"), the Board of County Commissioners for St. Lucie County (the "Board") adopted Resolution No. 00-053 which created the Briargate Municipal Services Benefit Unit (the "Briargate MSBU") to levy non-ad valorem special assessments based on the equivalent residential connection method of assessment to fund the cost of a project to provide potable water improvements to properties within the boundaries of the Briargate MSBU in unincorporated St. Lucie County, Florida (the "Project"), and authorized the St. Lucie County Director of Engineering (the "County Engineer") to proceed with the Project pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 1-13.5 of the Code; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2000 pursuant to Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code and Chapter 125 and Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes, the Board held a duly noticed and advertised second public hearing to consider propriety and advisability of the Project and to act as an equalizing board to consider the comments of affected land owners and other interested persons concerning the preliminary assessment roll for the Briargate MSBU, proof of publication of the public hearing is attached as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, after considering the comments of all interested persons, the Board has determined that the special assessments as set forth on the preliminary assessment roll for the Briargate MSBU, attached hereto as Exhibit "B", are just and equitable. -1- '-' ...,¡ NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, as follows: Section 1: The boundaries of the Briargate MSBU which include the real property to be specially assessed to fund the cost of the Project are shown on the attached Exhibit IICII. Section 2: The Project to be funded by a non-ad valorem special assessment levied by the Briargate MSBU is to provide potable water improvements to properties within the Briargate MSBU in unincorporated St. Lucie County, Florida. Section 3: The method of assessment for the potable water improvements shall be based on the equivalent residential connection method of assessment such that each property within the Briargate MSBU shall share equally in the cost of the potable water improvements and that the amount of the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the properties derived from the improvements. Section 4: The preliminary assessment roll (Exhibit "B") for the Briargate MSBU is hereby approved and confirmed and the assessment shall stand as a lien against the benefitted properties until satisfied. Section 5: A non-ad valorem special assessment (the "Special Assessment") in the total estimated amount of $52,947.59 which includes interest, to fund the Project as shown on the plans and specifications prepared by the County is hereby levied on the real property within the Briargate MSBU (Exhibit "C") in the amounts set forth on the preliminary assessment roll attached as Exhibit "B". Section 6: The Special Assessment shall be collected by the uniform method of collection pursuant to Sections 197.3632 and 197.3635, Florida Statutes, as authorized by Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code beginning in November 2001 for a period of ten (10) years. Section 7: The County Engineer is authorized to continue with the Project. Section 8: Upon the completion of Project, the County Engineer shall report the actual cost to the Board, and the Board shall confirm a final assessment roll with such adjustments as may be necessary in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code. Section 9. 'This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. -2- '-" ..."" After motion and second, the vote on this Resolution was as follows: Chairman Frannie Hutchinson Vice Chairman Doug Coward Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner Paula Lewis Commissioner John Bruhn PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 19th day of December, 2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney -4- '-" EXHIBIT "A" PROOF OF PUBLICATION -4- '-tI \...f ""wI EXHIBIT "B" PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL -5- ~ 'wi ~ EXHIBIT IICII t~.l7· MAP OF MSBU 1® - ( .c:n-002S-ooon) 40." - )' ~.~. ~.~. ~ro HENDERSON & ANGELOS (TR) ( t 11 -000 1 -0 10/5) . .. ~ ~ ... ..; 7. ~ AC. .0 oC . Z. <T.1 4.(.. ð. 5-4 Ac.. 3t-4. ~:}' Ilti. II I. I ~l(}£L. \.t. L. 10 ( 11 « -0000 -000/4) 0 . 3. 0 AC. ..... ~ ~ 11 Ïl ~ till. ð6' ~5.. (ð' lðY to . :96. 7.7' ~' 12 . C - ..,. 13 14 1 <: ..J .,; ~ t- O ~ ~ 0 => IOS' tOY !99.SI· t .., LANE ~ ~ - I S ~ '" ..., . 7 N ~ - . :-. ~ ~ ..... 6 5 ...; ~ .... 4 3 2 .1 R ..... ~ r-: -' "4 ~ ~ ~ I:a.~· \ðO' IOY IOY lð:5' 10S' 2OJ. 7T ... ~ 00 ~ V!) ~- -6- ~ .... '-' ITEM NO. 5C AGENDA REQUEST DATE: December 19, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [] PRESENTED BY: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING SUBJECT: Rouse Road M.S.B.U. - Paving and Drainage Improv 2nd Public Hearing BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: March 10, 1998 - Board accepted the MSBU Petition and granted permission to advertise the Initial Public Hearing to be held on April 7, 1998. April 7, 1998 - Board created Rouse Road MSBU and authorized Engineer to proceed with design and bidding of the project. October 27, 1998 - Board approved I nterlocal Agreement with St. Lucie Village November 14, 2000 - Board granted permission to advertise 2nd PH Staff recommends that the Board consider the comments of the property owners before adopting Resolution No. 00-284 to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the Rouse Road MSBU approving the attached preliminary assessment roll and to authorize the County Engineer to proceed with construction of the Project. COMMISSION ACTION: RRENCE: [x] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: [x]County Attorney [x]Public Works Dir [x ]Finance M,A \14 ~ ~ ouglas Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Sianatures [x ]Mgt. & BUdge~ [x ]Co. Eng [ ]Purch~sing [ ]Other '-" -....I COMMISSION REVIEW: December 19, 2000 ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 00-410 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners Donald B. West, County Engineer December 7,2000 Rouse Road MSBU - 2nd Public Hearing BACKGROUND Proiect Rouse Road is a County maintained dirt road located in the unincorporated area of northeastern St. Lucie County. In general, the road lies between Old Dixie Highway and the Indian River, and lies adjacent to the north limits of St. Lucie Village. Over the years, the residents have experienced flooding and hazardous travel conditions on the roadway. In addition, uncontrolled stormwater runoff from the unpaved roadway and adjacent properties have impacted a neighborhood canal extending from the Indian River. Currently, Rouse Road lies within a fifty (501) foot right-of-way. A minimum right-of-way width of sixty (601) feet is required to physically fit the paving and drainage improvements for an open swale design, therefore, additional right-of-way will be acquired. An alternate drainage outfall will be provided to resolve existing drainage problems associated with the roadway and off-site flows from adjacent properties and to re-direct turbid runoff, siltation and shoaling in the affected canal. In addition, stormwater detention areas will be designed to provide water quality treatment while limiting the freshwater discharge to the Indian River Lagoon System. Past History In 1987, residents that utilize Rouse Road for ingress/egress requested that the County consider creating a MSBU to provide paving and drainage improvements to Rouse Road. Preliminary construction plans and projected cost estimates were prepared but due to the lack of support of some residents and St. Lucie Villagels reluctance to the County levying assessments on their residents, the project was terminated. In 1996, property owners within the unincorporated area of St. Lucie County and the Town of St. Lucie Village petitioned St. Lucie County to re-investigate the feasibility of creating a Municipal Service Benefit Unit (M.S.B.U.) to provide roadway (paving and drainage) improvements to Rouse Road and to re-direct drainage away from an adjacent canal. The proposed MSBU boundary was defined based upon those that would benefit from the improvements. Twenty-three properties would benefit from the improvements, of which three (3) are in the unincorporated area and twenty (20) in the Town of St. Lucie Vmage (k/n/a the "project" boundary). Based upon the petition received, fifty-four (54%) percent are in favor of the project. This includes both the unincorporated County and St. Lucie Village owners. '-" ...." The Vice Mayor of the Town of St. Lucie Village fully supports this project and has been instrumental in initiating the MSBU for this project. We have since received a letter (attached) ,from the Vice Mayor which states that the Village will now fund their residents share of the project cost. As a result of the Village's contributional share, the proposed MSBU boundary has been revised to include only those parcels subject to the levying of an assessment (unincorporated area). Based upon the revised MSBU boundary, the final percentage in favor is eighty-five (85%) percent. If the MSBU is created, the County will enter into an interlocal agreement with St. Lucie Village. Under this agreement, St. Lucie Village will agree to fund the project costs for properties benefitting from the improvements that lie within the limits of St. Lucie Village. The Village will annually collect their share of the assessment from their taxes and disburse the funds to the County to pay toward the bond. On March 10, 1998, the Board accepted the Petition from the property owners and granted permission to advertise for the Initial Public Hearing to be held on April 7, 1998. On April 7, 1998, the Board adopted Resolution 98-081 creating the Rouse Road MSBU and authorizing the County Engineer to proceed with the design of the project. The design and bid of the project is complete and the tentative assessment has been mailed to the property owners. On November 2, 2000, an informal meeting was held with the property owners to explain the project design and tentative assessment. Based upon the tentative assessment amount, the property owners have collectively agreed to proceed with construction of the project and the levy of the assessments. Also, St. Lucie Village has agreed to contribute an additional $20,000 towards the County's share of the assessment as a means to help the unincorporateö proper1ý owner's assessment be more affordable. The methodology employed for the proposed improvements is based upon "trip generation rates". For undeveloped parcels, the maximum allowable development density was used to determine the number of trips generated per parcel. For developed single family residential properties, each parcel is assigned one (1) residential dwelling unit. The number of trips assigned to the existing mobile home park is based upon the maximum number of approved units allowed. In addition, those properties fronting on the roadway will receive additional benefits and will be assessed an additional component which is based upon the lineal front footage method. The bids received from the contractors to construct the entire project came in too high. Therefore, as a means to keep the construction costs down so that we may have a viable project, the County is proposing to construct a portion of the project using Road & Bridge's In-house Construction Labor Force. The total . ct cost is $241 209.00 and would be financed for a eriod of fifteen (15) earE, Beginning No·ý·ember, 2001 The total M BU assessment amount is 92,056. , excluding interest. '-" ....., In the event the Project is not ultimately approved and constructed, the cost of preparing the plans, specifications, bond validation hearing, and the cost estimates will need to be assessed against the property owners within the Rouse Road M8BU and 8t. Lucie Village. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board consider the comments of the property owners before adopting Resolution No. 00-284 to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the Rouse Road M8BU, approving the attached preliminary assessment roll and to authorize the County Engineer to proceed with construction of the Project. BP cc: Staff Concurring Tax Collector Property Appraiser ~ 'wi RESOLUTION NO. 00-284 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA: DETERMINING THAT THE PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE ROUSE ROAD MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT TO FUND THE COST OF A PROJECT TO PROVIDE PAVING AND DRAINAGE IMPROVEMENTS TO PROPERTIES WITHIN THE ROUSE ROAD MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT ARE JUST AND RIGHT; APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL BASED ON A COMBINATION OF THE TRIP GENERATION RATE AND FRONT FOOT METHOD OF ASSESSMENT; LEVYING A NON-AD VALOREM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ON THE REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE ROUSE ROAD MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT BASED ON THE APPROVED ROLL; AUTHORIZING COLLECTION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BY THE UNIFORM METHOD OF COLLECTION; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING TO PROCEED WITH THE PROJECT AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, on April 7, 1998, based on the petition of fifty four (54%) percent of the landowners within the unincorporated area of St. Lucie County and the incorporated limits of St. Lucie Village, pursuant to Chapter 1-13.5 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances (the "Code"), the Board of County Commissioners for St. Lucie County (the "Board") adopted Resolution No. 98-081 which created the Rouse Road Municipal Services Benefit Unit (the "Rouse Road MSBU") to levy non-ad valorem special assessments based on the trip generation rate and front foot method of assessment to fund a portion of the cost of a project to provide paving and drainage improvements to Rouse Road in unincorporated St. Lucie County, Florida (the "Project"), and authorized the St. Lucie County Director of Engineering (the "County Engineer") to proceed with the Project pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 1-13.5 of the Code; and WHEREAS, the estimated project cost is $241,029.05, without interest; and WHEREAS, the Town of St. Lucie Village has agreed to fund that portion of the project cost which is estimated at $128,972.22, without interest, and which benefits those properties lying within the incorporated limits of the Town of St. Lucie Village; and WHEREAS, the Town of St. Lucie Village has also agreed to contribute $20,000.00 toward the MSBU portion of the project cost; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2000 pursuant to Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code and Chapter 125 and Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes, the Board held a duly noticed and -1- ~ ......, advertised second public hearing to consider propriety and advisability of the Project and to act as an equalizing board to consider the comments of affected land owners and other interested persons concerning the preliminary assessment roll for the Rouse Road MSBU, proof of publication of the public hearing is attached as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, after considering the comments of all interested persons, the Board has determined that the special assessments as set forth on the preliminary assessment roll for the Rouse Road MSBU, attached hereto as Exhibit "B", are just and equitable. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, as follows: Section 1: The boundaries of the Rouse Road MSBU which include the real property shall be specially assessed to fund a portion of the cost of the Project are shown on the attached Exhibit "C". Section 2: The Project shall be proportionately funded by the Town of St. Lucie Village and by a non-ad valorem special assessment levied by the Rouse Road MSBU is to provide paving and drainage improvements to Rouse Road in unincorporated St. Lucie County, Florida. Section 3: The method of assessment forthe paving and drainage improvements shall be based on the trip generation rate and front foot method of assessment such that each property within the Rouse Road MSBU shall share proportionately in the cost of the paving and drainage improvements and that the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the properties derived from the improvements. Section 4: The preliminary assessment roll (Exhibit "B") for the Rouse Road MSBU is hereby approved and confirmed and the assessment shall stand as a lien against the benefitted properties until satisfied. Section 5: A non-ad valorem special assessment (the "Special Assessment") in the total estimated amount of $166,282.88 which includes interest, to fund a portion of the Project as shown on the plans and specifications prepared by the County is hereby levied on the real property within the Rouse Road MSBU (Exhibit "C") in the amounts set forth on the preliminary assessment roll attached as Exhibit "B". Section 6: The Special Assessment shall be collected by the uniform method of collection pursuant to Sections 197.3632 and 197.3635, Florida Statutes, as authorized by Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code beginning in November 2001 for a period of fifteen (15) years. Section 7: The County Engineer is authorized to continue with the Project. . Section 8: Upon the completion of Project, the County Engineer shall report the -2- ~ ,...", actual cost to the Board, and the Board shall confirm a final assessment roll with such adjustments as may be necessary in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code. Section 9. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. After motion and second, the vote on this Resolution was as follows: Chairman Frannie Hutchinson Vice Chairman Doug Coward Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner Paula Lewis Commissioner John Bruhn PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 19th day of December, 2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney -3- '-' EXHIBIT "A" PROOF OF PUBLICATION -4- ~ - .,.. '-" ~ EXHIBIT "B" PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL -5- ...: c:: 5 ~ 1:: Q¡ E g¡ tA ~ 'E '" ~ :¡ 55 f/) :::ii '\.. .~ ~ ~ 'E 0- 0- ~ <C ~ c:: &. .2 e :; a.. ,g ¡¡¡ l::: Q¡ E '" J!! ß 8 ~ !:: co :E >< UJ \w; EXHIBIT "C" MAP OF MSBU -6- - '-' -- '-" 'wi EXHIBIT "C" MAP OF MSBU ,'\.' .~" , ,. .J,.O:J"'~ ( r '---..1 .., - z C r:: -!~r ;D ;) r o ~ ? ~ ;..It ... j>qJ 0;- ;0 rP 0 0 ~ ~:- '!' " 0 ô c 00 .. ff) 0- ... 0 .:-< ;>-rr 0 ..... - " z: ! .. .. ....... (> 7~" r }- ,/ -- --........- r - ~y/ , )'/ C¡0oL:v J o ÎYSl.-' " /' r í ----4 '-' AGENDA REQUEST '-' ITEM NO. ..IDL DATE: December 19, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION SUBJECT: South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration Municipal Services Benefit Unit Public Hearing Stating the County's Intent to Use the Uniform Method of Collecting Non-Ad Valorem Special Assessments BACKGROUND: See Attached Memorandum FUNDS AVAIL. N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: November 21,2000 - Board granted permission to advertise the public hearing RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 00-275 stating the County's intent to use the uniform method of collecting non-ad valorem special assessments for the South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration MSBU. COMMISSION ACTION: RRENCE: pc] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ou I Anderson County Administrator [X]County Attorney: ~ [X]Public Works Dir~ Coordination/Siqnatures []Management & Budget: []Purchasing: [ ] Other: [] Finance (Info Copy Only) : ~ '-wi COMMISSION REVIEW: December 19, 2000 ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 00-409 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners Donald B. West, County Engineer December 7,2000 South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration Municipal Services Benefit Unit Public Hearing - Stating the County's Intent to Use the Uniform Method of Collecting Non-Ad Valorem Special Assessments BACKGROUND The Board is considering the creation of the South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration municipal services benefit unit for beach restoration along South Hutchinson Island. One of the funding methods available for the subject projects is through non-ad valorem special assessments levied on properties within the proposed MSBU and collected using the uniform method pursuant to Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes. In order to preserve this funding option, it is necessary for the Board to adopt a resolution for the proposed MSBU at a duly advertised public hearing held prior to January 1, 2001. The resolution does not in any way obligate the County to levy the special assessment, rather it simply preserve's the County's option to use the uniform method of collection if special assessments are levied. Attached to this memorandum is Resolution No. 00-275 which satisfies the legal requirement. RECOMMENDA TION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 00-275, stating the County's intent to use the uniform method of collecting non-ad valorem special assessments for the South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration MSBU. '-' ....." RESOLUTION NO. 00-275 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, STATING ITS INTENT TO USE THE UNIFORM METHOD OF COLLECTING NON-AD VALOREM SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED BY THE PROPOSED SOUTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND BEACH RESTORATION MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT; DESCRIBING THE AREA SUBJECT TO THE ASSESSMENT; STATING A NEED FOR THE LEVY; PROVIDING FOR MAILING THE RESOLUTION; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida (the "Board") is contemplating the creation of the South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration Municipal Services Benefit Unit (the "MSBU") to fund the cost of a project to provide beach restoration improvements to properties within the boundaries of the MSBU (the "Project") in St. Lucie County; and WHEREAS, the Board, as the governing body of the MSBU, intends to use the uniform method for collecting non-ad valorem special assessments to fund the cost of the Project as authorized by Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes because this method will allow the special assessments to be collected annually commencing in November 2001, in the same manner as provided for ad valorem taxes; and WHEREAS, on December 19, 2000 the Board held a duly advertised public hearing to consider the adoption of this resolution, proof of publication of this hearing is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A". -1- '-" '-" NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, as follows: Section 1: Commencing with the 2001-2002 Fiscal Year and with the tax statement mailed for the 2001-2002 Fiscal Year, the Board intends to use the uniform method of collecting non-ad valorem assessments authorized in Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes for collecting non-ad valorem assessments levied by the South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration MSBU to fund the cost of a project to provide beach restoration improvements to properties within the boundaries of the proposed MSBU. A description of the boundaries of the real property within the proposed MSBU and subject to the levy is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "B". Section 2: The Board hereby determines that the levy of the assessments are necessary to fund the cost of the Project. Section 3: Upon adoption, the County Attorney is hereby directed to send a copy of this resolution by United States mail to the Florida Department of Revenue, and the St. Lucie County Property Appraiser and Tax Collector. Section 4. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. -2- '-' \wtI After motion and second, the vote on this Resolution was as follows: Chairman Frannie Hutchinson Vice Chairman Doug Coward Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner Paula Lewis Commissioner John Bruhn PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 19th day of December, 2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney -3- '-' ....."" EXIDBIT A -4- '-' ....., EXHIBIT B DESCRIPTION: SOUTH HUTCHINSON ISLAND BEACH RESTORATION MSBU ALL THAT PART OF SECTIONS 9, 15, 16, 21, 22 AND 27, T-36-S, R-41-E AND SECTIONS 2, 3, 11 AND 12, T-37-S, R-41-E, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPT ALL RIGHT OF WAYS OF RECORD. -5- 1 EXHIBIT "B," '-" ,..." ! I 1 I I RANGE 41 EAST I --,-----------------¡- I ~I o (/)1 ~I I ¡ I ----~ Z I ~I ---- WfE s NORTHERN LIMITS OF BOUNDARY N.T.S. ::I: .- ::> o (/) 'ß S ~ V ...A ('" V "Þ ..A /' ...- CD tt') "Þ <::> (1 IL ::I: (/) Z ?: o .- ...- -, "-,. ,..."'. "'- - - --!- - -- ,-" - - I i ! 21 ~ ;:..\ <} ~ 'ß '-t- L ~ .-p L______~,-".,"-- i I ! ~ (' "% o o (1 ~ V ~ V "Þ .-p ...- --j---- 12 ST. LUCIE / MARTIN co." INE SOUTHERN LIMITS OF BOUNDARY ~ª ij SOvTIll.,~: J=g. B..CH~OrdtW-NCvU*&~¡g~~ .;. ~-R-EVTSTO¡n¡-:- ~~ lo¡;l J PUBUC WORKS DEPT., ENCINEERlNG DIVISION,!: : I : I: : Zion! ii M.S.B.U. SECTION i" I ' I¡--' --" -""----""-"""-,-"""--;-" ....0 !~o-i¡ ¡¡ 2300 VIRGINIA AVE.. FORT PIERCE. noRIDA 3.982 ¡ . ¡; : " I :¡ TELEPHONE. 6 2 - 1707 I _ 0033:ÖW'¡-"¡; ; '-" ......, AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. ~f+ DATE: December 19, 2000 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ I CONSENT [ I TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-257 - (Repealing Resolution No. 73-137 as Amended and Abolishing the Board of Governors); and Resolution No. 00-2~8 - (Creating the Technology Committee and Providing for Duties and Functions of the Committee). BACKGROUND: Please see attached Memorandum No. 00-1909. FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 00-257 and Resolutiop No. 00-258 as drafted. - [x] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: 4-1 (Bruhn) NCE: COMMISSION ACTION: ~ Originating Dept. Management & Budget 'n£o=",'oo Tech, º---?Ç Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ ~ ¡.. Review and Approvals purchasing County Attorney: Other: Eff. 5/96 , , '-" ""'" INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO: 00-1909 DATE: December 5, 2000 SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-257 - (Repealing Resolution No. 73-137 as Amended and Abolishing the Board of Governors) i and Resolution No. 00-258 - (Creating the Technology Committee and Providing for Duties and Functions of the Committee) BACKGROUND: On December 11, 1973, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, adopted Resolution No. 73-137 which established a Data Processing Board of Governors and provided duties and functions of the Board of Governors for the purpose of providing policy and planning functions for all County users and to supervise data processing activities. Numerous amendments were made to the original Resolution No. 73-137 over the years. In the St. Lucie County Automated Services Management Study Final Report dated August 31, 1999, submitted by MGT of America, Inc., MGT recommended the Board of Governors be abolished, and further recommended a Technology Committee be created in its place. The attached Resolution No. 00-257 and Resolution No. 00-258 have been drafted for that purpose. ; ~ ..." RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 00-257 and Resolution No. 00-258 as drafted. DSM/cac Attachments / :' '-' 'wi RESOLUTION NO. 00-257 A RESOLUTION REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 73-138 AS AMENDED IN ITS ENTIRETY (WHICH EST ABLISHED A DATA PROCESSING BOARD OF GOVERNORS AND PROVIDED FOR DUTIES AND FUNCTIONS OF THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS) AND ABOLISHING THE BOARD OF GOVERNORS WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following detenninations: 1. On December 11, 1973, the Board of County Commissioners ofS1. Lucie County, Florida, adopted Resolution No. 73-137 which established a Data Processing Board of Governors and provided duties and functions of the Board of Governors for the purpose of providing policy and planning functions for all County users and to supervise data processing activities. Numerous amendments were made to the original Resolution No. 73-137 over the years. 2. The Board of County Commissioners engagedMGT of America, Inc. ("MGT") to conduct a study of the entire Automated Services Department. 3. In the St. Lucie County Automated Services Management Study Final Report dated August 31,1999, submitted byMGT, MGT recommended the Board of Governors be abolished, and further recommended a Technology Committee be created in its place. 4. In order to abolish the Board of Governors, it is necessary to repeal Resolution No. 73-137 as amended, in its entirety. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida, that Resolution No. 73-137 as amended, is hereby repealed in its entirety, and the Board of Governors is hereby abolished. · ~. ""'" After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Frannie Hutchinson xx Vice Chairman Doug Coward xx Commissioner Paula A. Lewis xx Commissioner Cliff Barnes xx Commissioner John D. Bruhn xx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 19th day of December, 2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ~ .....,¡ RESOLUTION NO. 00-258 A RESOLUTION CREATING THE TECHNOLOGY COMMITTEE, AND PROVIDING FOR DUTIES AND FUNCTIONS OF THE COMMITTEE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following detenninations: 1. The Board of County Commissioners engaged MGT of America, Inc. ("MGT") to conduct a study of the entire Automated Services Department. 2. In the St. Lucie County Automated Services Management Study Final Report dated August 31, 1999, submitted by MGT, MGT recommended the Board ofGovemors be abolished, and further recommended a Technology Committee be created in its place. 3. This Board should create the Technology Committee for the purpose of advising the Board of County Commissioners on matters relating to Infonnation Technology County-wide; and to review and provide recommendations in all aspects relating to standard policies, procedures, and budgetary needs. 4. This Board should further define the duties and functions of the Committee. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County CommissiQners of St. ! Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board does hereby create the Technology Committee. This Committee shall have the following duties and functions: a. Review and update the Technology Plan annually. b. Monitor the level of technology support available to county offices and devise strategies for improving it as necessary. c. Assist in establishment of technology budgets. '-' ...., d. Provide assistance and guidance on the types and amount of training that should be available. e. Set priorities that help guide the development efforts of Information Technology. f. Develop hardware, software, and network standards. g. Offer advice on technology grant applications/proposals. h. Recommend revisions in policies and procedures that impact technology use. 2. The action, decisions and recommendations of the Technology Committee shall not be final or binding on the Board of County Commissioners, but shall be advisory only. 3. The Technology Committee shall consist of (14) members who continue funding the Information Technology Operating Budget and shall be appointed as follows: a. The County Administrator or his designee shall act as Chairman of the Technology Committee and appoint members with voting rights from Departments under the Board of County Commissioners. The Constitutional Officers; Court Administrator; State Attorney; and Public Defender will each appoint one voting member to serve on the Committee. b. The Committee may establish sub-committees for specific subjects or tasks from among its members to reduce the amount of time each Technology Committee member must devote to the functions of that committee and to spread the responsibility for contributing to the County's technology strategies among a larger number of people. c. All members shall serve without compensation. 4. Membership shall be terminated upon: a. Death b. End of Employment c. Removal by majority vote of the Committee d. Three (3) unexcused absences in a six (6) month period. Vacancies for all appointments shall be filled by the majority vote of the Technology Committee. 5. The Committee Chairman shall establish a time and place for holding the meetings as ,-,. ...".¡ shall be necessary and the Committee shall adopt rules of organization and procedure as may be required. 6. The Committee shall hold its first meeting as soon as possible from the date this resolution is adopted. 7. The County Administration staff shall provide support for the Committee by providing the required public notice, preparing agendas and keeping a record of its proceedings. 8. Ifanyaction, sentence, or clause of this resolution is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction then said holding shall in no way effect the validity of the remaining portions ofthis resolution. After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chainnan Frannie Hutchinson xx Vice Chainnan Doug Coward xx Commissioner Paula A. Lewis xx Commissioner CliffBames xx Commissioner John D. Bruhn xx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 19th day of December, 2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSION~RS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA .. BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY --, y '-' AGENDA REQUEST ...., f 11. ITEM NO. _ ~ DATE: December 19, 2000 REGULAR [XX] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Pursuit Boats (S2 Yachts) Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement. [x] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ouglas Anderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: fk- Purchasing: Management & Budget Originating Dept. Com. Dev. Dir.: County Eng. : Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 ~ ......,. INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 00-1966 DATE: December 8, 2000 SUBJECT: Pursuit Boats (52 Yachts) Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BACKGROUND: Attached is a proposed Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement between the County and 52 Yachts, Inc. (Pursuit Boats). Under the terms of the Agreement, Pursuit agrees to create up to one hundred twenty-five (125) full-time equivalent jobs in St. Lucie County. In return, the County agrees to pay Pursuit two thousand and 0/100 ($2,000.00) dollars per full-time job up to a maximum amount of two hundred fifty thousand and 0/100 ($250,000.00) dollars payable over eight (8) years. The maximum annual funding commitment is thirty-three thousand and 0/100 ($33,000.00) dollars. Pursuit's salary level commitment is eleven and 0/100 ($11.00) dollars per hour without taking into account the value of any benefits. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement. Respectfully submitted, DSM/ caf Attachment - '-' 'WI ST. LUCIE COUNTY JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT GRANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the 1 sf day of October. 2000, by and between St. Lucie County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by and through its Board of Commissioners, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY and S2 Yachts. Inc. () as individual, ( ) a partnership, ( X) a corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the COMPANY, whose Federal I.D. or social security number is 38-2040714. WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, it is the policy of the COUNTY to stimulate short term economic growth in St. Lucie County, by either attracting new businesses to St. Lucie County or by encouraging the expansion of existing businesses within St. Lucie County; and WHEREAS, the creation of new employment opportunities for residents of St. Lucie County and the increased tax revenues resulting from such business expansion or relocation with St. Lucie County is beneficial to the local economy; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that offering a Job Growth Investment Program encourages either businesses to expand or new businesses to enter St. Lucie County and thereby create new employment opportunities for the residents of St. Lucie County; and WHEREAS, St. Lucie County, through its Board of County Commissioners, has created a Job Growth Investment Fund; and WHEREAS, the COMPANY will either relocate to St. Lucie County or expand its existing business in St. Lucie County and thereby create certain new employment opportunities at a certain average salary level in St. Lucie County in accordance with the Job Growth Investment Grant Program criteria if the COUNTY provides to the Company a Job Growth Investment Grant; and WHEREAS, the COMPANY has been determined to beeligible to receiveaJob Growth Investment Grant by the COUNTY's Job Growth Investment Grant Team; and G:\ATTY\AGREEMNT\pursuit JGIG lO-Oo.wpd -1- .........-- ----- \.r' ~ WHEREAS, the COMPANY acknowledges that this Agreement shall be based upon proven performance of the requirements of these grant procedures; and, WHEREAS, the COUNTY finds and declares that it is in the public interest to award a Job Growth Investment Grant to COMPANY pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants hereinafter contained, the parties do agree as follows: 1. Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall mean: a. "Annual Average Wage" - includes salary, bonuses, and commissions. The Top Executive salary shall not be included in the average wage calculations. b. "Default" - failure to comply with the terms of the Agreement. c. "Effective Date" - shall have the meaning set forth in Paragraph 2. herein. d. "Expansion of an existing business" - A business establishing 5 or more jobs to employ 5 or more full-time employees in the County provided that such business increases operations on a site owned by the same business resulting in a net increase in employment of not less than 5 percent. e. "Full-Time Equivalent Job" - shall be established by total payroll hours per year divided by 52 weeks and 35 hours based on payroll hours at both the Company's current site and the site of the new expansion. f. "JGI Fund(s)" - shall mean Job Growth Investment Fund(s). g. "New Business" - a business establishing 5 or more jobs to employ 5 or more full-time employees in the County within the term of the grant provided that such business first begins operations on a site in the County clearly separate from any other operation owned by the same business. G:\ATTY\AGREEMNT\pursuit JGIG lO-oo.wpd -2- -.---- - ~ \.,; ....., g. "St. Lucie County Average Wage" - as determined by State of Florida Department of Labor the average annual wage per job in St. Lucie County. 2. Term; Termination. This Agreement shall be effective as of October 1, 2000 and shall automatically terminate eight (8) years after the Effective Date unless terminated earlier by the County because of a default by the Company. 3. Grant Eligibility; Payment Schedule. a. The COMPANY will be eligible for a Job Growth Investment Grant (hereinafter a IIGrantll) of $2,000 per Full-Time Equivalent Job up to a maximum amount of $250,000, which Grant shall be payable over eight (8) years in an amount each year equal to the number of new Full-Time Equivalent Jobs created in such year multiplied by $2,000. The County's maximum annual funding commitment is thirty-three thousand and 0/100 ($33,000.00) dollars. Any portion of the maximum annual funding commitment not paid to the COMPANY (the "Unused Amount") in any year shall be carried forward to the next year of eligibility and the applicable maximum annual funding commitment and the County's budget amount shall automatically increase by an amount equal to the Unused Amount. b. Eligibility Determination; Payment. The eligibility determination for of the amount of each annual payment of the JGI Funds shall be made on the first anniversary of the Effective Date. Subsequent eligibility determinations shall be made at each subsequent anniversary of the Effective Date. Payment of JGI Funds shall be made within forty-five (45) days after the date the COMPANY submits the last annual unemployment compensation report comprising the Annual Job Status Report (as defined in Paragraph 7) for each calendar year, and this payment obligation shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 4. Relocation Commitment. As a condition precedent to, and as consideration for obtaining JGI funds from COUNTY, the COMPANY agrees to locate or expand its business operations to St. Lucie County for a period of at least six (6) years to a suitable site as described on Exhibit II All, which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. G:\ATTY\AGREEMNT\pursuit JGIG lO-OO.wpd -3- '-' ......, 5. Job Creation Commitment. As a further condition precedent to, and as consideration for obtaining the full amount of JGI funds from COUNTY, the COMPANY agrees to create up to 125 Full-Time Equivalent Jobs in St. Lucie County as more specifically set forth on Exhibit "B", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. In the event the COMPANY creates more than sixteen (16) Full-Time Equivalent Jobs per year (including carryforwards for the prior years), the additional jobs may be applied toward the COMP ANY's job commitments in subsequent years. 6. Salary Level Commitment. As a further condition precedent to and as consideration for obtaining JGI funds from COUNTY, COMPANY presently agrees to pay each employee whose job is eligible for grants hereunder, a an average wage of $11.00 per hour, without taking into account the value of any benefits. The COMPANY shall provide written verification satisfactory to COUNTY to such average salaries in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 7 herein below. The COMPANY'S failure to maintain its salary level commitment for anyone year will not preclude the COMPANY's receipt of Grant amounts for subsequent years in which it is able to maintain its salary level commitment. 7. Annual Job Status. The COMP ANY must provide the COUNTY with quarterly unemployment compensation reports (Form UC6) of its business operations within St. Lucie County on the State form UC6 as amended which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "C". The COMPANY shall provide the reports at the same time it provides the State of Florida with the reports but no less frequently than semi-annually. The cumulative unemployment compensation reports required to be filed for the annual period prior to each eligibility determination shall collectively comprise the Annual Job Status Report. 8. Grant Restriction. The COMPANY warrants that its expenses in connection with the expansion of its existing business shall exceed the maximum amount of the Grant and, accordingly, there shall be no restriction on the COMPANY's use of Job Growth Investment Grant funds. 9. Default; Termination. In the event COMPANY defaults in the performance of its guarantees and commitments as provided for in this Agreement, the COUNTY may, at its option, terminate this Agreement. G:\ATTY\AGREEMNT\pursuit JGIG lO-Oo.wpd -4 - '-' ...." 10. Forum; Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Any and all legal action necessary to enforce the Agreement will be held in St. Lucie County or the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida. No remedy herein conferred upon any party is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy, and each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing by law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. No single or partial exercise by any party of any right, power, or remedy hereunder shall preclude any other or further exercise thereof. 11. Lobbyist Certification. The COMPANY warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the COMPANY to solicit or secure this Agreement and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual, or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the COMPANY, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. 12. No Discrimination Certification. The COMPANY warrants and represents that all of its employees are treated equally during employment without regard to race, color, religion, disability, sex, age, national origin, ancestry, or marital status. 13. Attorneys' Fees. If any legal action or other proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement, or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation in connection with any provisions of this Agreement, the successful or prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees, court costs and all expenses (including taxes) even if not taxable as court costs (including, without limitation, all such fees, costs and expenses incident to appeals), incurred in that action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief to which such party or parties may be entitled. 14. Enforceability. If any term or provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall, to any extent, be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such terms or provision, to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected, and every other term G:\ATTY\AGREEMNT\pursuit JGIG lO-Oo.wpd -5- '-' '-' and provision of this Agreement shall be deemed valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by law. 15. Assignment. COMP ANY shall not assign this Agreement to any other persons or firm without first obtaining COUNTY's written approval. 16. Conflict of Interest. The COMPANY represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder, as provided for in Florida Statutes 112.311. The COMPANY further represents that no person having any interest shall be employed for said performance. 17. Notices. All notices required in this Agreement shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested and if sent to the COUNTY shall be mailed to: With a copy to: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 and if sent to the COMPANY shall be mailed to (current, official address): S2 Yachts, Inc. 725 East 40th Street Holland, Michigan 49423 19. Entire Agreement. The COUNTY and the COMPANY agree that this Agreement sets forth the entire Agreement between the parties, and that there are no promises or understandings other than those stated herein. None of the provisions, terms and conditions contained in this Agreement may be added to, modified, superseded or otherwise altered, except by written instrument executed by the parties hereto. G:\ATTY\AGREEMNT\pursuit JGIG lO-Oo.wpd -6- '-' """ IN WITNESS WHEREOF I the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made and executed this Agreement on behalf of the COUNTY and COMP ANY has hereunto set its hand as 0 the day and year above written. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY I FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney S2 Yachts lIne. wxæ~ BY: VP Finance 14~ ,,/n/,ooo Title Kirk Lambers Typed Name G:\ATTY\AGREEMNT\pursuit JGIG lO-Oo.wpd -7- .,..., 'w1I EXHIBIT "A" TO THE JOB GROWm INVESTMENT GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND S2 YACHTS, INe. (To be completed by Program Administrator) Company Identification and Information: Applicant code number: 00-4 Application date: August 1,2000 Company description: Boat Builder Company address of expanded site: S-2 Yachts, Inc. Sapp Road Fort Pierce, Florida 34946 Company mailing address (notify County of new address when known): S2 Yachts, Inc. 725 East 40th Street Holland, Michigan 49423 G:\ATTY\AGREEMNT\pursuit JGIG lO-OO.wpd -8- '-' .,¡I EXHIBIT "B" TO THE JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND S-2 YACHTS INC. (To be completed by Program Administrator) I. Tare:et Industry Category eligible for application: A viation/Engineering Agriculture/Aquaculture /Food Processing (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Business/Financial Services (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Computers and Electronics Industries(eligible for 10% cluster bonus) BiotechlMedical/Pharmaceutical Industries (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) .x. Marine Manufacturing Industries (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Sports/Recreation Manufacturing Industry (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Research & Development related industries (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Companies that utilize green technologies (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) National Corporate Headquarters (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Other (not eligible for cluster bonus) n. Application Section Criteria: X Expansion (125 jobs) Relocation L-or jobs) m. Employment Commitment: COMPANY is receiving this grant based upon its representation that it presently intends to bring the following employment opportunities to St. Lucie County: 1)_ Total number of employees (new and existing) expected during term of grant 2) 125 New, full time employees at both the COMPANY's current site and the site of the new expansion (eligible for grant application) expected during term of grant, 3)_ % of County residents (to be verified by employee's quarterly unemployment compensation report) 4) $11.00 Average salary of all employees to be employed by company except for Top Salary 5) $10.88 Average salary; St. Lucie County average G:\ATTY\AGREEMNT\pursuit JGIG lO-Oo.wpd -9- ".., .." EXHmIT 'c' FORM (UC6) G:\ATTY\AGREEMNT\pursuit JGIG lO-OO.wpd -10- Sct 10 00 12:35p Pursuit-Human Resources 561-460-4623 p. 1 ~ ...""" PURSUIT October 1 0, 2000 AITN: Kathleen Stubbolo Pursuit's average hourly rate = $12.00Ihour (without salaried positions) Benefits averageapprox. 40% = 4.80 TOTAL AVERAGE: $16.80 -..... ULTIMATelY, THII(E ís PURSUll 3901 $1. lucie Boulevard, Folt Pierce, Flo/lda 34946 ' 501-465-6006 I FAX561'465-ti1 77 IIIIWW.pursullboats,com Qct 10 00 12:36p (") 5 g <:: i .. " Co r.n ~ " ;' ¡ ¡¡ ~ '< " g c ~ ~ ;¡; ~ '" '" 'Õ ~ ~ CJ !! ; S' Ii o ~ ä· g ~ Co ("}t;d....... o ø 00 3 ...... '< "0 ~ 0 ØJ ~ e; ::3 ::3 CI.I '< _ 0 ~' 0-' ~ ~ ØJ õ§~ ?fo.:.~ (I) .- ~. øV>tT s~w ~oo o....,p. '< C1I I» (1J ~'< ø ()(¡ (/] go-:g, ::3 (1) en 5. 8 ~ g- 3 ¡;;. !:T. "0 rn o (þ ::: ::3 CI.I ~I» . ...... ~ õ' o ::: :;j = ......"0 ~õ 0.:.3 ~.~ ØJ ...., 0 ~ ~ "O~ ...... ....... o 0 0\'0 'à"- g o ...., en ª Õ ~ (þ '" ...... o g, IÎ o g ...., ër &. o ::3 N ::u () :< o 00 ---- Q ..... ;:0 'CI ~ ~~ t'\1 ;: ." 3 ¡;:. -6 .... = _. "1:1 Q ~ Q n I» '< 3'< .... ø /") 1'= õ' (þ = ... = ~ ~ ~ I» = ""d I: - = ;- = > Co =' C. '" ." (þ ~. Co Q.. '" .¡.. - ""d I» 0 ... ::s - 0 r'1 ..-. :::; to) :J:" '-' .... c:t1 =- I» :!. =' C1Q W "0 o '(i (1) en - 00 ~ ~ CI.I o ......., I» ()Q (1) § c. o <: rn >-1 ~. S- o ::: (1) ,.-... - '-' '< en ~ o -. en o ~ ¡;;. o w ~ ;> "0 '0 ..... o <: (1) 0.. IÎ o = '"1 (J ø CI.I 5. - 0- (1) ...., (1) §' c:r Ei '" ø C. g¡ 2: õ ~ VI ...... o o ~ j> -.....) V> ~ I tc VI o ~ (") ~ I» VI VI Pursuit-Human Resources 561-460-4623 '-" * .,. n ØJ ª o ..... ¿t,<!J,<!),~ '"'1:1"'0 'iJ >-0 a a a a ~;:h;:h:=¡ ~,...,... .-.. cr' ø o ::3 'T1 o 8. ..... =:. (") o § en ~ Eï (JQ o ...., t1 ø (') ..... en õ' ::3 ~ ~ S' tIQ r ø I» <: (1 ØJ ...... øcr"cr'cr' X C1I (1) (þ g ~ ~ ~ ø (1) (1) (!) 0.. C1I (!) (þ S'::: ::: ::3 ()Q ~NO 0\060 o""-'-~ 0:;;R~~ ......0 QQ. Q 0' I I I v O\. ::. N Š660 0000 § ~f( 'ß 'ß ...... ØJ "" e 033 :3 .;'~oo a g § ~ ;?ooo en................, C'" "C. 'tt. "0 ~ 8 8 Ò ø;:h::;¡:=¡ Q.........r+-....... H (11 en en . ::.::T'::::r:;¡- 01» "" "" ~ @ ~ ~ o P.- P.- P.- W N- 000 ~~~ "" :;j '< ...... 5' .... (þ c.:. c ::L ::3 ()Q ...... ;T ø ..0 = ~ (!) ~ ""d ... o :::1 - 00 :T I» ... S' i1Q 0= o :I = fI) :g I» ::I .,. .,. *C ffê c en (J (!) ø Q. 0..<: <: "" "" (") (") I\) ~" ::. =:. 0 o :;j ::3 '='> ~ ~ S~ .... "" 2. ~ o-;:r (!) 0 "" = n ::!. n'< Ii en o 3 0.."0 Q Õ "0& I\) 0 ..... (J o.:.~ g ::: ...... - ~?f ....."0 ¡{¡. ~. ifC. _, 0 80S Q § o "" 815 ~ :~t C'" ~. o (J §.~ '< a- "" ,..,. (þ N-.......-O\""d ~ .~~ ~ 3 ~ Vlg~~~2: ;;¡ ~ ' " >-:3 N I - W ~ o -0 ~. Q. N V> Q. 0.. 0- ""00..1\)1»;=. ~~~~~I~ +~VI t"' - >< P. I» '< ~ N-V,-O\O .;'~ð~3~ ::! 0 "" "" 0 ~ v' ~ I; ...., (J - I tð ~ ":"1 (j ~r_ow~ p.NVlo..o..tI: ",,0o..ØJP' 0 ,<o.l»~~_ '" .., '-< '-- ,:::.'ü1 '" F: p. -< "" * '::S.. * ~ N .- VI .- 0\ ¡~ ~~&~§It ~~~7~~ ~~~õ~;; ~0o..g-o..~ 'ü1 ~ ~'ü1 ~ : +~!II '" - p. "" '::S.. ~ ~ þ) f') .., ..... 5' :I * ~ ""d (þ ... rIJ o ::: æ. o þ) '< ~ N "0 ~ >-t (") I» Õ ::3 c.:. ~ '< ~ ~ ~ \0 0..0- .....0 ~[ o "" 0'< :::!:¡ ~(A, o _. ~ ~ a' 2' ()Q p. ):::I'" ¡;r o 00· [z ~ 0 '" ~ "" -< VI 0 ~. Qj C§ :- 8.t1 cr"ØJ '<~ 3 æ: § 0 I\) 3 {J<:¡ 0 . en -r 3 ¡;)' o ~ ~~ :< 'Tj o §. ::T' o ...., '-< k '? r "" cr" o ...., d ØJ :< >--1 ::T' ~ en (JQ <' .-- ::3 ~ () [ VI ª P' .'" - - £. ö: ~ '-<!: rIJ "'l'J I: = ~ -r !.. ~ rÞ I\) < rÞ M 3 "t:I ë '-<!: /TI /TI > "" '" ê;j' ..... I» =:s f') rÞ C 'ö Õ w 0.. I\) ~ 0.. 0' '0 (b o 0.. 5' ()Q o o ...., (!) ~ r:;t. 8 ,..... (J)', ~ 'i5' ~ ...., (b ~ ~ "0 ~ CI') o (b ::r: c 3 § ?J o (J o ~ ..... n o en S? .... (1! (') ,..,. o '"1 Õ' ... ...., D (p ~ e. p.3 t:= ~ 2: M ~ ¡..oJ n o ~ ~ ~ C) ~ ~ §3 V) ~ ...., = ~ 2: trj ~ )ooo i-3 !o"d > ~ ~ ø ~ Oct 10 00 12:35p (') S g ~ ~ ~ " ~ Q. '" ~ 'õ ~ ~ " ~ '< ö 2 ~ ~ ~ Z m ~ ~. a> " :: n E' (j o 3 ¡ a, o " i ~ '" :< o 00 -- o tiC$: :\O := (1) '< I-t 0..- n ~. () ~ 3 ~ '. cr' >- (1) ~ S' trJ '" '" ~ (1) ~ "0 0..- "'t (1) "T' ~ ;:! .....::s VI (1) n (1) :\O. (1) CI'J::;:"""'d ::r~ 03 ~ -, ('1) ~ m8 ~ '" "0 (1) ::J '" (1) '" -- \0 \() >r ~ ;.< .... a' r;" 1'fJ "'0 (1) ::: e: := (JQ >- (') (') o = ::I - :> õ ~ '" Ö' ... "'0 ..... ('1) I ..... ~ ;.< n o ::s .... ::I. cr' S. õ' ;:! '" Õ' ..... .... ::r' (1) Õ' - Õ ~ 5' aq t:;I (1) "'0 (1) ::s ç.. (1) ::s .... ~ (1) "'0 M) ::I Q. M) = ..... '" ~ r'" ~ - = "" = ., ¡¡; ::: (') (1) V1 "0 0- ¡;:: v> ('0 ~~ ..... - NO "o~ g~ >< bA )-0 "0 o o .....rJj ~~ ; >- .....,æ § ~ ::J ~ ¡;:: ~ '" e:. ~ tI1 p) () ::r' ..... 0- ¡;:: ::I ç.. (1)- p.. .... o ;:¡ (1) ~ ::J" OQ' ::r' (1) ..... bA ..... "0 o o Õ 3 ~ ;.< 0- ...., V) N o _0 o 8 n 2": s: Eß VI o o Pursuit-Human Resources '-' ~ ;; - = '" = ., Q: ::: (') (1) o\~rJj £1»>- 0"' ;:;: t"" g,=š>- c::r CJ'Q ~ I» '"Tj ;;;¡ '" (1) .~J Õ·::I· ~ 38..0 o ' Z S-V1t"" ~g~ '< ;:I. g ....., §.ª ~ tI Õ' 00' >-t g. ...-~ w -, <!q ('1) Q: ~g '" (11 ::s :t¡ 8.(; o ¡;¡ (11 Q ;.< p.. () ('1) ('0 p.. fT! p... o o o 3 o ::s .... ::s-' -< "'0 p) Š (1) ~ t"" o ::: (JQ ...., M) ... 3 2 '" Q: 0" = .... '-< ~'@$:-1:::O~1'fJ (1) 0"1 I» ::r (1) :\O ~ (1) ;:J ;.< ~ aq _. ;0;-"'0 -. (1)' = .... . ~ Õ 3 p) Q;" 5' ~ ,<c:~>-tCJ'Q~ ~a~'g;?~ <: S 0\ '< ::I. t:::t <;0000- ;:;:::s ~ ....., 0..- ::r" ...... 0 0 I _e:o=~ ('1) '< ...., (1) ~"'Ocr'~p.. ....š~~(1)~ ::r _. ('t) tI) :\O ();o;- ::s (1) 3 '="> 0::10- 0 =.... ... (11 = S- (1) '< $2..e:~ (1) .... '< ::s- e; 0 (1) 0 0- ~ ~ g ;: () ~. >Õ (1) (1) = ..... ,(1)00.0 ~. 0.. V) 0 nV)Õ'p- (1)_0\....'< 1»0......(1) @ g w e; (1) ~ 0 - ('0""" 00 (1) '" & ;><;'"(1) ~ ~. ~ ~ :3 r;" çj s:.. (1) ... = "" 0'\ ~. C/l ~ ~: 0- 0- e:. ....., .....,~ cr' ~::I. ~ (1) 0 ~. (1) P- o p:;- (1) (b ;:! ~-õ aëï õ ~~ (1)(1) þ) .... 3 0- ::I S" -< (11 8 Sf 00 '" Õ' '... ~ Ê "0 I» '< 8" g, o ....., .þ. 561-460-4623 ~~I~ o p-, ~ .....,==r: oq CJ'Q t-' .... '"Tj 0- (1) ~ ::I. ~ 8.. (1) (1) I ;0;--...) -<e. "'0 I» ""~ '< ,.-, ::1 o ..... Õ (1) >< ("¡ (1) (1) 0.. ~ 1"-1 VI 0\ .-:-' (¡) U1 '" § '< '" ..... :\O ::s ç.. ~ e. ç.. o P- c: ~ õ' ::s (F Ro "" "0 "'0 (;' ~ rn S" >: (1) Y' Ö' ... N C\ ~ (b (1) p:;- en ...." 1'fJ =- o .., .... ... 1")" '"I a ~ 1;;' Q: =. ..... <~ VI ..- 00 ';ft.0 ("¡ ~ o () <: 0 ~ ~ cÆ ..... (1)J¿ '::'1(1) o 0- ... ...., g'--g g!. ~ P (1) 3 g ~. ~ o <' ~... (1) § ~ p..~ o .... ;:¡. ("¡ ::J"~ 0- P- o ::I .... ¡:)' <JJ ('. ~ ÕO (:> U> ~. ¡:r. I» ~ N VI § ;; §. Q.. G p- = ("¡ .... õ' .... ~ rÞ ;::1 .... ~ - ::: tI> c' ., ~ ::: t'> rÞ ~ (1) Q" n I» - .... ::: '" = ., Q: ::s (') G Ot= ....M) ~c.. n = rÞ (') < ::::. ~. 0" ~. ~ V} ,.... VI ("¡ o "0 P> ""<: .... ;::1 , '2: I rÞ 0..... I' ~ o ., ~ o ., -....!v)o ONc WO..... O~ò ~~ VI¿: O('tJ 0..... '0 ~ (1) 0 ..... ., [~ ~ p.2 := ~ :2 ~ ~ ~ () o -< ~ ~ C') ~ '" ~ S1 ~ ~ t'!'j Z tr'J ~ ~ ~ ~ ;> () ~ > o ~ Oct 10 00 12:36p () is o " c g ~ M Õ. ~ ;' i ã " ~ .-< o 8 '3 " ~ ~ z '" m '6 c ;¡ ~. ~ .. " .. ,.. () o 3 'Q ; Ô ? ~ -0 Q. w id ~ .< o ~ <=> ..... ---. \0 'l:I Pursuit-Human Resources 0'-' C-"Tt ('þ 0 '0 .... P> 0 :4. 0 3 ('þ ('þ ,..... o VI ¡;'< -('þ 2e; o .., n ('þ ¡r ~. o (') ? ('þ 561-460-4623 ....., ,: I"> :: '"I ~ 3 I"> :: .... t"" :::: == n =- r.> o Cf ~ = Q.. C'} $ o \>9 W' .J'..J&, 0", o~ 0_ ~o õef ~ ~ (þ ~. 0. (,0 00 Õ'~ .... P> "'t ...... Ei (:l. '" 2- 5. ('þ .-.. po ('þ n S :::r- "2..';¡¡ ~ ~ ct1 .-.. ('þ 0 en 0. (1) "0 § 0... ('þ o <-+ n e: õ: .., (1) o o -, C/.J N' ('þ S "ò. Õ '< (1) (1). en "'t ¡:: .., E. .... Cf g ~ 9 8 en n S § ('þ o c= '" n Õ ....... :::;" S' ()Q ~ - '"G. :::> en ~ (1). .... n "0 .... (1) en ('þ o Õ 0... § 0. P> UJ N- en n c::r o ¡;- ""! ~ =- oS' _. tT1 '{t 3 8"0 en _ o '< (1) ('þ en ~ ~ o :::r"' tw -<:: (1) 0- ('þ ct1 Ö ('þ 3 '0 - o '< ('þ 0- ~ C/.J ~ ~ r;. ('þ >- ~ ~ '"I Q. "" .~ ¡;- ~ I1Q ('þ ~ õ ~ ~ :I n ('þ E.'} W N '0 ('þ ,.., 2. õ C/.J N Õ' .... \J¡ ,...... ~o - VI N <:) '< (1) ~ .... en tw .... ('þ ~ óQ' CT Õ Õ en ('þ Õ .\l ::t> o 3 po o 9 cr" (1) .... o ....., <¡S. ::Þ p.4 t:d M :z M ~ .., n o < M ~ ø t!:! ~ ~ ~ ~ '""i Cd t'!j '2 ~ ~ - ~ Þ-O > ('j ~ Cl M - - - ~i/ '-' AGENDA REQUEST ITEM'1:ÎO. _~ DATE: December 19,2000 REGULAR [XX] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Mirabella Yachts Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement. [x] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: C02' ~ Douglas Anderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: a ¡¡)Ú ~ Review and Approvals Management & Budget ~ Originating Dept. Camm. Dev. Dir. : Purchasing: County Eng.: Finance: (Check fO~C~iY ,nlY, if applicable) ð1< fYi~fè ~ Eff. 5/96 .- '-" .."", INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 00-2005 DATE: December 13, 2000 SUBJECT: Mirabella Yachts Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: Attached to this memorandum is a draft Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement between the County and Mirabella Yachts, Inc. Aviation Division ("Mirabella"). Under the terms of the Agreement, Mirabella will create a minimum often (10) full-time equivalent jobs in St. Lucie County. Mirabella will also make a capital investment of one million four hundred thousand and 0/100 ($1,400,000.00) dollars in the County. In return, the Agreement provides that the County will provide Mirabella with a grant of up to seventeen thousand and 0/100 ($17,000.00) dollars payable over a two (2) year period beginning October 1, 2001 or when Mirabella first hires employees, whichever date first occurs. The grant amount is based on one thousand dollars per job with bonuses. Mirabella's salary level commitment is nineteen and 04/100 ($19.04) dollars per hour. Ninety percent (90'10) of the new employees will be St. Lucie County residents. The County has also agreed to reimburse Mirabella for road impact fees in the amount of thirteen thousand four hundred seventy-five and 0/100 ($13,475.00) dollars. W' ...." RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement. DSM/ caf Attachment '-' 'wi ST. LUCIE COUNTY JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT GRANT AGREEMENT Tms AGREEMENT is made as of the day of , 2000 by and between St. Lucie County, a political subdivision of thëState of Florida, by and through its Board of Commissioners, hereinafter referred to as the COUN1Y and Mirabella Yachts Inc. Aviation Division( ) as individual, ( ) a partnership, (X) a corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the COMPANY, whose Federal I.D. or social security number is 65-0498277. WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, it is the policy of the COUNTY to stimulate short term economic growth in St. Lucie County, by either attracting new businesses to St. Lucie County or by encouraging the expansion of existing businesses within St. Lucie County; and WHEREAS, the creation of new employment opportunities for residents of St. Lucie County and the increased tax revenues resulting from such business expansion or relocation with St. Lucie County is beneficial to the local economy; and WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has determined that offering a Job Growth Investment Program encourages either businesses to expand or new businesses to enter St. Lucie County and thereby create new employment opportunities for the residents of St. Lucie County; and WHEREAS, S1. Lucie County, through its Board of County Commissioners, has created a Job Growth Investment Fund; and WHEREAS, the COMPANY will either relocate to St. Lucie County or expand its existing business in S1. Lucie County and thereby create certain new employment opportunities at a certain average salary level in St. Lucie County in accordance with the Job Growth Investment Grant Program criteria if the COUN1Y provides to the Company a Job Growth Investment Grant; and WHEREAS, the COMPANY has been determined to be eligible to receive a Job Growth Investment Grant by the COUN1Y's Job Growth Investment Grant Review Committee and Economic Development Division; and WHEREAS, the COMPANY acknowledges that this Agreement shall be based upon proven performance of the requirements of these grant procedures; and, WHEREAS, the COUN1Y fmds and declares that it is in the public interest to award a Job Growth Investment Grant to COMPANY pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow gnt - 8 Sept. 2000 -1- ~ ....., NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and mutual covenants hereinafter contained, the parties do agree as follows: 1. DefInitions. As used in this Agreement, the following terms shall mean: a. "Annual Average Wage" - includes salary, bonuses, and commissions. The Top Executive salary shall not be included in the average wage calculations. b. "Default" - failure to comply with the terms of the Agreement. c. "Effective Date" - shall have the meaning set forth in Paragraph 3.A. herein. d. "Expansion of an existing business" - A business establishing 5 or more jobs to employ 5 or more full-time employees in the County provided that such business increases operations on a site owned by the same business resulting in a net increase in employment of not less than 10 percent. e. "Full-time Equivalent Job" - shall be established by total payroll hours per year divided by 52 weeks and then, divided by 35 hours. f. "JGI Fund(s)" - shall mean Job Growth Investment Fund(s). g. "New Business" - a business establishing 5 or more jobs to employ 5 or more full-time employees in the County within the term of the grant provided that such business fIrst begins operations on a site in the County clearly separate from any other operation owned by the same business. h. "St. Lucie County Average Wage" - As determined by State of Florida Department of Labor, Workforce Development Board or Enterprise Florida, Inc.:, the average annual wage per job in St. Lucie County. 2. Term; Termination. This Agreement shall be effective upon the date of execution of this contract by both parties hereto, and shall automatically terminate two (2) years after the Effective Date unless terminated earlier by the County because of a default by the COMPANY. 3. Grant Eligibility; Payment Schedule. a. The COMPANY will be eligible for a Job Growth Investment Grant (hereinafter a "Grant") of an amount up to $17,OOO.Oo-which Grant shall be payable as follows: 2 Year funding: Year 1 - 50%; Year 2 _ 50%. The two (2) year period will begin on October I, 2001 or the date the Company fIrst hires employees, whichever date fIrst occurs G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow gnt - 8 Sept. 2000 - 2- '-" -....I (the "Effective Date"). The County shall pay $1000.00 per Full-Time Equivalent Job. Bonus criteria shall apply as set forth in Exhibit "B". The Company will also be eligible for a one-time road impact fee reimbursement in the amount of $13,475.00, payable at the time of issuance of the building pennit for the hangar. b. Eligibility Determination; Payment. The initial eligibility determination for payment of the JGI Funds shall be made on the first anniversary of the Effective Date. Subsequent eligibility determinations shall be made at each subsequent anniversary of the Effective Date. Payment of JGI Funds shall be made within forty-five (45) days after the date the COMPANY submits the last annual unemployment compensation report comprising the Annual Job Status Report (as defmed in Paragraph 7). and this payment obligation shall survive the termination of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, should the date for filing the last annual unemployment compensation report. as described above. not coincide with the date that an eligibility determination is made. the COMPANY shall have the right to file a report. in fonn substantially similar to an annual unemployment compensation report. and in such event, such report shall constitute the Annual Job Status Report. the filing of which shall begin the running of the forty-five (45)-day period within which payment shall be made. 4. Relocation Commitment. As a condition precedent to, and as consideration for obtaining JGI funds from COUNTY, the COMPANY agrees to locate or expand its business operations to St. Lucie County for a period of at least six (6) years to a suitable site as described on Exhibit "A". which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 5. Job Creation Commitment. As a further condition precedent to, and as consideration for obtaining JGI funds from COUN1Y. the COMPANY agrees to create a minimum of 10 Full-Time Equivalent Jobs in St. Lucie County as more specifically set forth on Exhibit "B", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. The COMPANY's failure to maintain its job creation commitment for anyone year will result in the forleiture of the Grant amount for those Full-Time Equivalent Jobs not created it was scheduled to receive for that year; however. such forleiture will not preclude the COMPANY's receipt of scheduled Grant amounts for subsequent years in which it is able to maintain its job creation commitment. 6. Salary Level Commitment. As a further condition precedent to and as consideration for obtaining JGI funds from COUN1Y, COMPANY agrees to pay an average wage of not less than $19.04 per hour annually for those jobs which are eligible for grants hereunder which wage shall be adjusted for inflation to confonn to the County's growth rate as detennined by the Department of Labor without taking into account the value of any benefits. The COMPANY shall provide written verification satisfactory to COUNTY to G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow gnt - 8 Sept. 2000 - 3 - ~ """ such average salaries in accordance With the provisions of paragraph 7 hereinbelow. The COMPANY'S failure to maintain its salary level cOmmitment for anyone year Will result in the forfeiture of the Grant amount for those Full-Time Equivalent Jobs where the salary COmmitment was not maintained it was scheduled to receive for that year: however, such forfeiture Will not preclude the COMPANY's receipt of scheduled Grant amounts for subsequent years in which it is able to maintain its salary level cOmmitment. 7. Annual Job Status. The COMPANY must provide the COUN1Y With quarterly unemployment compensation reports (Fonn UC6) of its bUSiness operations Within St. Lucie County on the State fonn UC6 as amended which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "C". The COMPANY shall provide the reports at the same time it provides the State of Florida With the reports but no less frequently than semi-annually. The cumulative unemployment compensation reports required to be rued for the annual period prior to each eligibility detennination shall collectively comprise the Annual Job Status Report. 8. Grant Restriction. The JGI funds available under this Agreement as referenced in paragraph 2 Will be provided only for reimbursement of expenses associated With the physical move, relocation and/or expansion of the COMPANY to St. Lucie County including but not limited to corporate or company relocation expenses, infrastructure costs, leasehold improvements, company sponsored child day care facilities, rent for company facilities, lease buyouts, training expenses and other expenses approved by the Job Growth Investment Grant Team. 9. Default: Termination. In the event COMPANY defaults in the perfonnance of its guarantees and cOmmitments as provided for in this Agreement, the COUN1Y may, at its option, terminate this Agreement. 10. Indemnification. For ten and 0/100 ($10.00) dollars consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the COMPANY shall indemnify and save hannless and defend the COUN1Y, its servants, and employees from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, and/or cause of action which may arise from any negligent act or Omission of the COMPANY, its agents, servants, or employees in the perfonnance of services under this Agreement. 11. Forum: Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Any and all legal action necessary to enforce the Agreement Will be held in St. Lucie County or the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida. No remedy herein conferred upon any party is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy, and each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing by law or in equity or by statute or G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job_grow gnt - 8 Sept. 2000 - 4- ~ ......,¡ otheIWise. No single or partial exercise by any party of any right, power, or remedy hereunder shall preclude any other or further exercise thereof. 12. Lobbyist Certification. The COMPANY warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the COMPANY to solicit or secure this Agreement and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual, or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the COMPANY, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. 13. No Discrimination Certification. The COMPANY warrants and represents that all of its employees are treated equally during employment without regard to race, color, religion, disability, sex, age, national origin, ancestry, marital status, or sexual orientation. 14. Attorneys' Fees. If any legal action or other proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement, or because of an alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation in connection with any provisions of this Agreement, the successful or prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees, court costs and all expenses (including taxes) even if not taxable as court costs (including, without limitation, all such fees, costs and expenses incident to appeals), incurred in that action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief to which such party or parties may be entitled. 15. Enforceability. If any term or proVisIon of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall, to any extent, be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such terms or provision, to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected, and every other term and provision of this Agreement shall be deemed valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by law. The COMPANY's failure to maintain its job creation commitment or salary level commitment for anyone year will result in the forfeiture of the Grant amount it was scheduled to receive for that year; however, such forfeiture will not preclude COMPANY's receipt of scheduled Grant amounts for those subsequent years in which it is able to maintain its job creation and salary level commitment. 16. Assignment. COMPANY shall not assign this Agreement to any other persons or firm without fIrst obtaining COUN1Y's written approval. 17. Conflict of Interest. The COMPANY represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder, as provided for in Florida Statutes 112.311. The COMPANY G :\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow gnt - 8 Sept. 2000 - 5- '-' ...",.¡ further represents that no person having any interest shall be employed for said perlonnance. 18. Notices. All notices required in this Agreement shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested and if sent to the COUNTY shall be mailed to: With a copy to: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce. Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 and if sent to the COMPANY shall be mailed to (current, official address): Mr. Craig Young, Director of Operations Mirabella Yachts, Inc. Aviation Division 3170 Airman's Drive Fort Pierce, FL 34946 19. Entire Ag;reement. The COUN1Y and the COMPANY agree that this Agreement sets forth the entire Agreement between the parties. and that there are no promises or understandings other than those stated herein. None of the provisions. tenns and conditions contained in this Agreement may be added to, modified, superseded or otherwise altered, except by written instrument executed by the parties hereto. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow gnt - 8 Sept. 2000 - 6- ~ ...", IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made and executed this Agreement on behalf of the COUNTY and COMPANY has hereunto set its hand the day and year above written. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney WITNESSES: COMPANY BY: Title Typed Name (Corporate Seal) G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow gnt - 8 Sept. 2000 -7 - '-" .." EXHIBIT "A" TO THE JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND Mirabella Yachts, Inc. Aviation Division (To be completed by Program Administrator) Company Identification and Information: Applicant code number: 00-6 Application date: November 3, 2000 Company description: Aircraft Manufacturer (SIC 3721) Company new location address: 3170 Airman's Drive Fort Pierce, FL 34946 Company new mailing address (notify County of new address when known): G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow gnt - 8 Sept. 2000 - 8- ~ ....." EXHIBIT "B" TO THE JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND Mirabella Yachts, Inc. Aviatino Division (To be completed by Program Administrator) I. Target Industry Category eligible for application. Qualified companies will fall in either the manufacturing and related industries, or high tech/high wage industry sectors (as dermed by Enterprise Florida), or energy sector: I X AviationÆngineering (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) AgricultureJAquaculturelFood Processing (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) BusinessIFinancial Services (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Computers and Electronics Industries (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) BiotechlMedicallPharmaceutical Industries (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Marine Manufacturing Industries (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) SportslRecreation Manufacturing Industry (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Research & Development related industries (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Companies that utilize green technologies (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) X National Corporate Headquarters (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Other (not eligible for cluster bonus) II. Application Section Criteria: ·X Expansion <- or jobs) Relocation (10 jobs) New Business (#_ of jobs) III. Employment Commitment: COMPANY is receiving this grant based upon its representation that it will bring the following employment opportunities to St. Lucie County: 1) !!! 2) !2. Total number of employees (new and existing) expected during term of grant New, full time employees (eligible for grant application) expected during term of grant 3)~ 4) $19.04 5)~ of County residents (to be verified by employee's quarterly unemployment) A verage salary of all employees to be employed by company except for Top Salary A verage salary; St. Lucie County average 6) $1.4 Million-Capital Investment Amount (Building improvements, equip~ent etc). G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow gnt - 8 Sept. 2000 - 9- '-' ....." (TO BE COMPLETED BY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR) Attach a copy of USC 6 Form G:lattylagreemntldocsljob-grow gnt - 8 Sept. 2000 -10- DEC-01-00 11:20 AM MIRABELLA YACHTS IHC. 561466 3764 11 ·')0 ~O()O it); 5(¡ FAI ~K.~UK,!(ORRIS " (:". StðÞ: ofFlodda Uner.:pIOy~t CClI!";pc:nS1tJOn Form '...I - .~~( DLES HOniG! UC liDO). J SGðrch ~~~~~~ - 0 ; .. I . 1 It "'. 0 t II IT I!- m. pi", y, III e u t.. . Com p ~ " ~.s t. L 40 n - .. Employer's Qu.rt¡-rly RIp-ort¡:.iCT,t¡ YQur Confirmation Numbe.r Is 934961 , I~ yo" åo I10t ::Irln! :l'1e ~fm I)Ifl4I615 rel;.;~d tre ~0I11H"ation N;Jmber f~( your re,~'d., TheDlVlllon J{ Úret11~fcY".I~ COIr,L)or:llilliliun fKtI/7Ttn.r.çh. you print the"Uc;T-ð fOf"n fgr YIJLlr ...~rd:., To ø(lnt your :::om~I I led ~jCT.e Fnrm, LltI!'! '!"I,JF ,nter.lp.t browser', ::rirt lundo" O\J"I't~ Er.din~ t D\lCD·.ur I P'f) II't AftnDm-' I "'=COU;1t NUIT,b¢r '11"" be, J'). %000 lOC:fobcr H 2000 lOetøbu 31. !OOO IIJ"C6~ MIRABELLA Y.'\Ch'"TS INC - ¡¡1 ~~ft!hJl Ii n.,<Rar~ ,0000 2nd ~r\ 'uth ~ a F £.1. Number 650493177 Jt.dMcntb,~ 8- SICC* J 7999 -- . '::r'pII1)lCH Grc.. W~I~ -F.mfl:oyet'J.s~!':, - Err.JIIDyee'j F.¡li ~am¢ h't Fif!:, MI l"3ið trill Ouar.u J1~""; t~tMA. R¡:U:~ A S7.Sn 00 n""6-19W £i\r.\1A. MlCNArt S9.151.2' 165- ~9S81 Sn:.rKENSO~. JO":'\I '( S!P'OO2 :~'-4489· VAGHAJU lÄC~ A- S8 ð;j 1.09 .c3ð·U~J YOUNC. CRACe A S2J.649,9S ~80-0" 3044 cun ~ TO\\'. A.U!U:IA. ~H3.134...a ~1().4118 o\USTIN. CLAtJDE R S I :i.l20S 590-'5~:O ALVAUZ. Rt'BtILA S9.375.oo Th. .rea, IUI.d b.low will be I;l1c;lIlitCrd for YOU 011/ Gro". ~.!.. P:¡141bl¡¡ Ouurer . S9U]UO WIl!eA P!l.id Thit QUlrter In Excen of S7,OOO pef t;mplo)ta i111~ Voar, The ~:'(eeS3 Irl1~t:nc ¡, S9:.079.19 ued OD re¡lù,~ 41ed w¡ln UC. AdjuWn~r¡t() i¡¡ fMllÌft. CDntact· ~\t.":h¡5' HffIC'\.', 1X1b,,: v.·a¡;c!. for this Q'J3:T1!' . S7,7;2~ IIJ\Du( {~ ella/':v Cue $0.00 tettst DUt 50.00 oral Amount Dur ~alct i ~heck. payable to florid It !J.e. FUI1.i 50.OQ ;(/u.J ("tV! !( r10ït" ,.""... '''I '11/.;øUUrJI) mlc~Jf Sao. mlil III ~'CIC$IIPIUIIJI..:uJ ""'" Qlelð~ftl ~r 001'''.....''. .s.nci m~ 10 l.III"h-.......l'd1.. .,." n ..... "';c" ~Mf\nK.\1 ""bl"",, P1~...", .(~.Irc. ..4 ¡..plo:,",,,, SoCW\:y t.lir lipU.«· IIIIJL")' r.~. :0l1li ìtnp'ò:!/W\II\V tlctaxnport.fl.indp¡¡uO'ITIIFL DIU C rorm?rim. asp P.05 ~OI)I P3!N 1 on 10'\ J(!(I(O DEc-a1-aa 11:19 AM MIRABELLA YACHTS IHC. '-' 561 466 3764 ....." TITLE JOB DESCRIPTION AND PAY RATE PAY SCALE 1 -Director of Operations 1 -Director of Maintenance 1 -Chief Pilots 1 -A & P Mechanic 2 -A&P Mechanics @ $20:00 each I . Inventory/Stock 1 -Helper 1 - Pilot! A&P Mechanic 1 - Office Manager Tota] Hourly Rate Average Hourly Rate for 10 Emps. $ 43.26 $ 29.08 $ 26.44 $ 21.57 $ 40.00 $ 15.00 $ 8.00 $ 15.00 $ 15.14 $213.49 $ 21.34 317Q Airmans Drivt· FI. Pierce, ¡:Iurida 34946' 561·466·3700' ¡:;¡x: 561·466·3764 3 Aviation Division p.a4 - ~-- - - - , DEC-81-88 11 :19 AM MIRABELLA YACHTS INC. 561 466 3764 '-" "'" MIIV\BELlA 'YACHT; INC. EMPLOYEES HIRED AFTER MOVE TO Ft. PIERCE F ox, David 4185 Old Dixie Hwy Ft. Pierce, FI 34951 Hired 9· 28-00 South, Lance 4945 Sparkling Pine Circle Ft. Pierce, FL 34951 Hired 11-6-00 3)70 ^irmans Drivt· Ft, Pi«cr, ¡;]nrida 34946"S6+·~·3700· rax: 561·466·3764 2 Aviation Division P.83 .. - DEC -0 1 -00 11: 19 AM MIRABELLA YACHTS I HC. 561 466 3764 '-' ...." M IIV\ BELlA 'YACHT; INC. Aviation Division EMPLOYEE LISTING Emplovees Hired Prior to Move Austint Claude 1633 SW 'fivan Lane Port St. Lucie, FL 34984 Hired 6-94 Cheeatow, Albert A. 1284 S W Moonlite Cove Port 81. L~cie, FL 34986 Hired 0 1-98 Emma, Helen 9460 Meadowood Drive #202 Ft. Pierce, FL 34951 Hired 2-99 EmDJovees Hired for Move Emma, Michael 9460 Meadowood Drive #202 Ft. Piercè, FL 34951 Hired 6-26-00 Fox, David 4185 Old Dixie Hwy Ft. Pierce, Fl 34951 Hired 9-28-00 Roark, Don 219 Fisherman's Wharf Slip #2 Fort Pierce, FL 34950 Hired 12-01-00 Stephenson, John 3245 SW Sunset Trace Circle Palm City, FL 34990 Buying land in Aero Acres in Ft. Pierce Hired 7·98 Young, Craig 260 1 N. Indian River Dr Fort Pierce, FL 34946 Hired 6-94 Vagharit Zachari 612 S. US 1 Fort Pierèe, FL 34950 Hired 5-15-00 3170 Airmans Drive' Ft. Pierce. Florida 34946' 561-466-3700' r;lx: 561-466·3764 P.02 '-' ....., EXHIBIT 'C' GRANT A WARD CALCULATION NOT TO EXCEED $200,000 MAXIMUM, INCLUDING BONUSES - I¥: Grant Amount: $10,000 Base Amount ($1000.00 Dollars per job) x (10 jobs) Bonuses (use 10% x base amount on each of the following: 50 or more total jobs (10% bonus) 50% or more local hires (10% bonus) 75% or more local hires (20% bonus) X 90% or more local hires (25% bonus) A verage salary for applicant's jobs will be 125 % of St. Lucie County average salary «10% bonus) Average salary for applicant's jobs will be 150 % of St. Lucie County average salary (20% bonus) X Average salary for applicant's jobs will be 175% of St. Lucie County average salary (25% bonus) +$ 7,000.00 Total Bonuses $17,000.00 Total Grant (base amount + total bonuses) $13,475.00 $30,475.00 Road Impact Fee Reimbursement Total Grant (including road impact fee) G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow gnt - 8 Sept. 2000 -11- '-' ...,.¡ JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT (JGIG) PROGRAM PROCESS Application Review, Approval and Funding: 1. Board of County Commissioners (BCC) adopt JGIG Program guidelines. 2. BCC establish funding for JGIG Program. 3. BCC establishes a Job Growth Investment Grant Review Team (Review Team) comprised of sixmembers whose composition includes One (1) Economic Development Council Representative, One (1) representative each the from City of Fort Pierce, and the City of Port St. Lucie (appointed by the City Manager), one (1) representative from the business community; and two (2) from the County appointed by the County Administrator. 4. The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners (SLCBCC) Economic Development Division (EDD) produces collateral material promoting JGIG Program and application forms. 5. Applicants will submit written project details to the SLCBCC EDD and the Program Administrator including anticipated number of new hires during the term of the grant, job descriptions with starting salaries, benefits packages, training programs and capital investment. The grant agreement shall be performance based. 6. SLCBCC EDD receives and screens applicants for qualification recommendation. 7. SLCBCC EDD submits all applications to the Review Team for consideration and/or approval. 8. Applications recommended for approval are to be submitted to the Program Administrator for verification and presentation to the Board of County Commissioners. 9. The Program Administrator shall inform the applicant, by letter, of the Review Team's recommendation and the date, time and place the Board of County Commissioners will consider the approval. 10. JGIG grant agreements are presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval and execution (consent agenda when standard contract is adhered to and regular agenda when standard contract is not used, indicating the effective date of contract if not the BCC approval date of grant agreement). 11. Community Development Director (CDD) receives invoices with receipt documentation from approved applicants, checks the invoices, removes all invoices ineligible for reimbursement, and makes a determination of compliance with grant agreementlJGI fund program. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow gnt - 8 Sept. 2000 -12- ......" ~ 12. OBM approves invoices and submits item to Clerk of BCC (Finance Department) for audit and payment. 13. If there is any dispute over the eligibility of costs submitted for reimbursement, then such dispute shall be submitted to the Review Team for recommendation. The Review Team shall refer unresolved issues to the BCC for review and action. 14. The Program Administrator will monitor COMPANY regularly to confirm compliance with targeted hiring goal. 15. COMPANY will supply quarterly unemployment compensation reports to the Program Administrator as required by the agreement, and documentation as necessary to the Program Administrator, for use by SLCBCC in its annual report to BCC at the end of the 12-month period following operational start up, demonstrating that the job creation and salary level commitment were achieved. The COMPANY's failure to maintain its job creation or salary level commitment for anyone year will result in the forfeiture of the Grant amount it was scheduled to receive for that year; however, such forfeiture will not preclude the COMPANY's receipt of scheduled Grant amounts for this subsequent years in which it is able to maintain its job creation and salary level commitment. 16. The Program Administrator will monitor COMPANY annually to determine its economic impact of its relocations or expansions. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow gnt - 8 Sept. 2000 -13- '-" ..., JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT (JGI) FUND JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT PROGRAM CRITERIA I. Fund Administration: 1. Job Growth Investment Fund ("Fund") monies will be managed and dispensed by the S1. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners ("Board"). 2. The St. Lucie Economic Development Division (SLEDD) will be the executive agent for accepting applications for Fund monies. The SLCEDD will review each application received to ascertain the extent to which it meets the criteria presented below. A copy of the application will be forwarded to the Program Administrator. The SLCEDD will recommend consistent applications to the Job Growth Investment Grant Review Team for review on a weekly basis. 3. The Review Team must evaluate and, if appropriate, render a preliminary commitment (approval) within fourteen (14) days of the SLCEDD Director's presentation, and schedule each approved application for [mal consideration at the next available meeting of the Board, but not more than fourteen (14) days from Review Team action. This time criterion for Board consideration may be extended upon request of the SLCEDD or by the Board or the Program Administrator. 4. Recognizing that the funds for the Job Growth Investment Fund Program are limited, the Commission may prioritize, approve, disapprove and/or modify grant awards (including awarding of authorized bonuses) for the program at its sole discretion. II: Application Selection Criteria: 1. Any industry expansion within St. Lucie County or relocation to the County that encompasses: A viationlEngineering, Agriculture/Aquaculture Food processing, Business and Financial Services, Computers and Electronics Industries, Biotech/MedicaVPharmaceutical Industries, Marine Manufacturing Industries, National Corporate Headquarters, Sports/Recreation Manufacturing Industry, Research & Development-related Industries, industries that utilize "Green" technologies and other industries. 2. Expansion/relocation will create ten percent of total employment or more, paying (an average of) at least 100% of St. Lucie County's Private Sector average salary/wage level. A lower average wage may be accepted by the BOCC if the impact is off-set by the number of jobs created or by a large investment into the community or addresses a special need of the community. 3. The total direct economic impact of the project to the County including the number, type, and quality of the jobs and capital investment which will be produced in the County during the construction of the project and thereafter; and G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow gnt - 8 Sept. 2000 -14- '-' ...., 4. The direct economic impact of the project to the County including the number, type, and quality of jobs benefits offered, capital investment and whether the company is in a targeted industry which will be produced in the County as a result of suppliers, service providers and vendors serving the project. II. Grant Limits: 1. The maximum for grant award is a maximum of $2,000 per new-job created; larger per job awards are possible for those companies meeting Bonus Criteria. 2. The maximum ~rant award is $200,000.¡, including bonuses with the flexibility to increase the cap for outstanding projects upon recommendation of the SLCEDD, the Review Team and approval by the Board. 3. Unless otherwise determined by the Board, the grant award will be phased in over a two (2) year period as follows: Year 2 (grant awards of less than $25,000) (a) Year 1 - (b) Year 2 - 50 % of grant ) ) on anniversary date 50 % of grant ) Year 6 - Grant A wards of more than $25,000 (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) (1) Year 1 - Year 2 - Year 3 - Year 4 - Year 5 - Year 6 - 20 % of grant) 20 % of grant) on anniversary 20% of grant) date 20 % of grant) 10% of grant 10% of grant 4. Funding awarded per job created: 5. Bonuses may not allow a company to exceed the maximum award cap of $200,000.00 without BOCC approval. (a) Company line of business is within the industry clusters identified in Exhibit "B", Section I; or (b) Job Growth within 12 months exceeds 50 jobs or 10 % of total employment. (c) The average per-job salary/wage projected in a subject application is greater than 125% of St. Lucie County's average private sector salary/wage (10% bonus); jobs greater than 150% of St. Lucie County's average private sector salary/wage level (20% bonus); jobs greater than 175% of St. Lucie County's average private sector salary/wage level (25%) bonus. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow gnt - 8 Sept. 2000 -15- ~ >.; (d) In addition to the bonus criteria set out above, a 10% bonus may be awarded if at least 50% of jobs are filled by residents of the County who have resided in the County at least one (1) year prior to the application; a 20% bonus if that number exceeds 75% ; and a 25% bonus ifthe percentage of local hires is at or above 90%. The grant award amount will be based upon the number of jobs created,: Funding A warded: ./ I JOBS CREATED AMOUNT PER JOB 5 -19 20-49 50-99 100-149 150 and over $1,000.00 $1,250.00 $1,500.00 1,750.00 $2,000.00 v. Reimbursement of County Road Impact Fee Payments Any business that applies for and qualifies under the JGIG program, may, as part ofthe JGIG, apply for reimbursement of County Road Impact Fees for new construction associated with the expansion or relocation. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow gnt - 8 Sept. 2000 -16- 1 v / ~ .."., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 1 DATE: 12/19/00 CONSENT REGULAR X PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [] Quasi -Jud. [] SUBMITTED BY: Community Development TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Continuation of the Request for Major site Plan and Preliminary Plat Approval for the project to be known as Anacostia SiD for Property located on the east side of South SR A-1-A, approximately 1,300 feet south of the entrance to Frederick Douglas Park - Draft Resolution 00-139. BACKGROUND: Petition of Crimsòn North Group Limited for Major site plan and Preliminary Plat Approval for the project to be known as Anacostia SiD for a 10-lot residential subdivision. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A. PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board of County Commissioners continued the hearing on this agenda item so that the applicant can redesign the project to allow for the location of any proposed structures closer to the west property line of the proposed lots and allow for greater protection of the dune line and reduce its erosion. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Draft Resolution 00-139 granting Major Site Plan and Preliminary Plat Approval for the 10-lot residential subdivision project to be known as Anacostia SiD for property located on the east side of South SR A-1-a, approximately 1,300 feet south of the entrance of Frederick Douglas Park. X] APPROVED ] OTHER: [ DENIED Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: Jy Review and AÐÐrovals Management & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Originating Department: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) ~ '-' """" y. COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: December 19, 200(} Resolution 00-139 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Community Development Director Date: December 13, 2000 Subject: Petition of Crimson North Group Limited for Major Site Plan and Preliminary Plat Approval for the project to be known as Anacostia SID. LOCATION: East side of South SR A-I-A, approximately 1,300 feet south ofthe entrance to Frederick Douglas Park. PROPOSED USE: 10-lot residential subdivision ZONING DISTRICT: HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) LAND USE DESIGNATION: RU (Residential Urban) PARCEL SIZE: Overall acreage - 21.24 acres Development area - 7.65 acres FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #8 (7583 South A-I-A), is located approximately 5 miles to the south. UTILITY SERVICE: Water will be provided by the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA). Sewer service is provided by the St. Lucie Utilities Department. TRAFFIC IMP ACT REPORT: Determined to have met the standards of reVIew. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT: Determined to have met the standards of reVIew. · '-' 'wII December 6, 2000 Page 2 Petition: Anacostia SID COMMENTS On December 19,2000, you will be asked to review the major site plan and preliminary plat for the project to be known as Anacostia SID. This project is proposed for location on 21.24 acres of property located on the east side of South SR A-I-A, approximately 1,300 feet south ofthe entrance to Frederick Douglas Park. The project consists of 10 residential lots. This agenda item was continued from the Board of County Commissioners meeting of December 12, 2000, to allow the applicant to redesign the project to allow for the location of any proposed structures closer to the west property line of the proposed lots and as far away from the dune line as possible in order to allow for greater protection of the dune line and reduce its erosion. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the above referenced project and found it to meet the minimum technical requirements set forth in Section 11.02.04 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The applicant has provided a Sea Turtle Protection Plan which details the lighting plan for the proposed project. This plan meets the requirements for coastal lighting for the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission. The applicant has also provided approved pennit infonnation pertaining to the proposed wetland impacts and related mitigation for these impacts. These infonnation packages also outline the required beach dune restoration measures for the proposed project. The 21.24 acre project area consists of a 11.50 acre conservation easement and a bisecting 50 foot wide roadway previously approved through the Army Corps of Engineers. Staff recommends approval of the attached Draft Resolution 00-139, which would grant major site plan and preliminary plat approval for the project to be known as Anacostia SID, subject to the following conditions: Pursuant to Section 3.01.03(AA)(7)(A) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the first 7 units of this project are not subject to the alternate development fee. The remaining 3 units will be subject to the alternate development fee in addition to any other applicable impact fee that the County may lawfully assess. ....... -- '-' ,..., December 6, 2000 Page 3 Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. SUBMITTED: -J1 ~ 1 a I. Shewchuk, AICP ommunity Development Director Attachment hf cc: Michelle Coward - Houston Cuozzo Group, Inc. Richard Ladyko, P.E. - Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. Jack Mitchell, Crimson North Group Limited File Petition: Anacostia SID 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 '-' ....., RESOLUTION 00-139 FILE NO.: MJSP-OO-O05 A RESOLUTION GRANTING MAJOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS ANACOSTIA SUBDIVISION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Crimson North Group Limited. presented a petition for Major Site Plan Approval for a 10-lot residential subdivision to be known as Anacostia SID proposed for a 21.24 acre parcel of property located on the east side of South SR A-1-A, approximately 1,300 feet south of the entrance to Frederick Douglas Park in the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District 2. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet minimum technical requirements of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and to be consistent with the future land use maps from the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 4. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. 5. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. 6. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 7. The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services. 8. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on December 12, 2000. File No.: MJSP-00-005 December 19, 2000 Resolution 00-139 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 - '-' ....." NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the 80ard of County Commissioners of the St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the site plan for the project to be known as Anacostia SID is hereby approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Houston Cuozzo Group, Inc. dated October 20, 2000, and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Community Development Director on October 27, 2000, is described in Part 8 below, subject to the following condition: Pursuant to Section 3.01.03(AA)(7)(A) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the first 7 units of this project are not subject to the alternate development fee. The remaining 3 units will be subject to the alternate development fee in addition to any other applicable impact fee that the County may lawfully assess. 8. The property on which this Major Site Plan Approval is being granted is described as follows: THE NORTH 338 FEET OF FRACTIONAL SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST; THE SOUTH 338 FEET OF THE EAST Yz OF GOVERNMENT LOT 8, SECTION 19, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST; THE NORTH 440 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOT 1 IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST; AND, THE NORTH 440 FEET OF GOVERNMENT LOTS 1 AND 2 LYING EAST OF STATE ROAD A-1-A IN SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST LESS AND EXCEPTING FROM ALL OF THE ABOVE THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR STATE ROAD A-1- A. (Location: East side of South SR A-1-A, approximately 1,300 south of the entrance to Frederick Douglas Park.) C. This site plan shall expire on December 19, 2002, unless final plat approval or an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(8)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code. D. The Major Site Plan Approval granted under this resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Crimson North Group Limited, including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary development permits and construction authorizations from the appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities, including, but not limited to; the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Resolution 00-139 Page 2 File No.: MJSP-00-005 December 19, 2000 , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ~~ '-' "'-" Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District, prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part B. E. A Certificate of capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on December 19, 2000, which certificate shall remain valid for the period of Major Site Plan Approval. Should the Major Site Plan Approval granted by this resolution expire or an extension be sought pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land development Code, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. F. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Section A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Frannie Hutchinson xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX Vice-Chairman Doug Coward Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner John D. Bruhn Commissioner Cliff Barnes PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 19th Day of December 2000. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney hf H:\WP\RESOLUTI.N\FINISHED.OO\Anacostia.SP\AnacostiaRES.wpd Resolution 00-139 Page 3 File No.: MJSP-00-005 December 19, 2000 ·\.f 'wi CONSE ITEMS .... .... .... . . . BOARD OF couNTV' COMMISSIONERSS MEETIN6 '-' ....., PAGE 1 12/15/00 ...., ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD - FZAB\lARR \lARRANT UST 111- 09-DEC-2000 TO 15-DEC-2000 FUND SUMMARY FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 001 General Fund 312,851.55 23,044.15 001122 CDBG--\lorld of Plastics 34,986.00 0.00 001124 FTA USC Section 5307 FY 99/00 3.37 0.00 001128 Section 112/MPO/FH\1A/Planning FYOl 804.62 0.00 001130 TC Community Action Agency FYOO/Ol 2,610.29 0.00 001238 O'ITE-Rail Spur Magnum Environmental 5,819.00 0.00 001252 Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab Grant 10.85 0.00 001256 crD TRIP Grant FY 00/01 19,910.56 0.00 001807 Floridian Aquifer \lell Monitoring 10.85 0.00 101 Transportation Trust Fund 29,920.98 0.00 101001 Transportation Trust Interlocals 139,652.28 0.00 101002 Transportation Trust/80% Constitut 14,360.40 0.00 101003 Transportation Trust/Local Option 43,540.00 0.00 101006 Transportation Trust/Impact Fees 1,650.00 0.00 102 Unincorporated Services Fund 18,918.72 0.00 102001 Drainage Maintenance MSTU 7,999.00 0.00 104 Grants & Donations Fund 74,208.56 0.00 105 Library Special Grants Fund 1,285.75 0.00 107 Fine & Forfeiture Fund 302,876.46 0.00 107002 Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar 34,328.36 0.00 121 Blakely Subdivision Fund 65.41 0.00 140 Port & Airport Fund 8,177 .54 0.00 140001 Port Fund 58.33 0.00 140121 FAA Taxiway A-3, Airfield Signage 44,140.70 0.00 140310 Airfield Signage 1408784-1-94-01 4,904.52 0.00 160 Plan Maintenance RAD Fund 1,172.91 0.00 183 Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir 417.34 0.00 183001 Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat 11.86 0.00 183002 Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat 150.00 0.00 183004 Ct Admin.- Teen Court 532.37 0.00 184202 Ft Pierce Inlet Mgmt Implementation 4,743.03 0.00 185001 SHIP Housing Assistance FY 00/01 14,931.69 0.00 186 Recycling Operating Fund 3,109.12 0.00 186204 Recycling & Education Grant FYoo/Ol 3,024.63 0.00 242 Port I&S Fund 210,126.28 0.00 304 Communication System Fund 295.30 0.00 305 Beach Acquisition Fund 2,520.00 0.00 316 County Capital 1,935.00 0.00 316001 Transportation Capital 1,430.00 0.00 362 Sports Complex Improv Fund 26,042.45 0.00 382 Environmental Land Capital Fund 5,410.00 0.00 393 \lestglen MSBU Capital 4,591.66 0.00 401 Sanitary Landfill Fund 5,248.44 0.00 401220 Litter Control & Prevention FYoo/Ol 3,041. 76 0.00 418 Golf Course Fund 17,117.04 0.00 421 H.E.\l. Utilities Fund 1.56 0.00 441 North Hutchinson Island Utilities 16,481.01 0.00 451 S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund 18.42 0.00 '-" ....., 12/15/00 -- ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 2 ~- FZABYARR YARRANT LIST 111- 09-DEC-20oo TO lS-DEC-2000 FUND SUMMARY FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 461 Sports Complex Fund 13,602.82 0.00 471 Holiday Pines Utilities Fund 50.09 0.00 491 Building Code Fund 479.41 0.00 501 Information Technology Fund 158,327.02 0.00 505 Health Insurance Fund 212,956.16 8,517.27 505001 Property/Casualty Insurance Fund 15.05 0.00 510 Service Garage Fund 29,399.30 0.00 611 Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund 4,338.67 0.00 625 Law Library 15,532.91 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 1,860,Ì47.40 31,561.42 12/15/00 '-"' ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ....", ,,- FZABWARR VOID LIST# 11- 09-DEC-2oo0 TO 15-DEC-2000 FUND: 418 - Golf Course Fund CHECK INVOICE VENOOR TOTAL 00265698 12103144 Liquidmetal Golf 798.86 798.86 FUND TOTAL: PAGE 1 12/15/00 FZABT,rlARR , - ... '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ....., VOID UST# 11- 09-DEC-2oo0 TO 15-DEC-2000 FUND: 461 - Sports Complex Fund CHECK TOTAL INVOICE VENOOR 00265267 12102236 Professional Supply FUND TOTAL: 1,596.00 i,596.00 PAGE 2 J ... ~ '-' AGENDA REQUEST IT~O. C-2Ft DATE: December 19,2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 PRESENTED BY: þ~~~.~ (Óonald B. We ,P.E. County Engineer SUBJECT: River Park Water Quality Improvement Project - Engineering Work Authorization Proposal with BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. BACKGROUND: The River Park subdivision was developed prior to the establishment of regulations which require treatment of stormwater runoff before it enters our water bodies. Stormwater runoff within the subdivision discharges to the North Fork of the St. Lucie River with no stormwater treatment other than through the grassed roadside swales. To provide a measure of stormwater treatment for a portion of the subdivision, staff proposes to design and construct baffle boxes at two of the main stormwater outfalls from the subdivision at the North Fork. The baffle boxes will trap the majority of sediments and other suspended solids in the stormwater before it is discharged to the North Fork. The trapped materials can then be removed periodically from the boxes and disposed of properly. The proposed budget is as follows: Engineering $24,970.40 Surveying $ 1.300.00 Total: $26,270.40 Grant funds for construction will be pursued through the St. Lucie River Issues Team and any other sources that become available. FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds will be made available in accounts 102001-3725-563003-xxxxx* and 102001- 3725-563005-xxxxx* (Drainage Maintenance MSTU), *Project numbers will be established. PREVIOUS ACTION: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff is requesting approval of the attached Engineering Work Authorization for BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. to design baffle boxes to improve the quality of stormwater runoff discharging from the River Park subdivision in the amount of $26,270.40. Staff requests approval of the project budget outlined above, and authorization for contract execution by the Chairman. [x] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED ~ COMMISSION ACTION: Douglas nderson County Administrator [X]County Attorney [X]Originating Dept. Public Works ~ .t...........- (Y [X]Mgt. & Budget [X]Co. Eng M\)\, r, [ ]Comm. Dev, [X]Budget Coord. rp1T t1 '-' ......, WORK AUTHORIZATION River Park Baffle Boxes Project Pursuant to the terms and conditions of that certain Agreement Between County And Engineer For Continuing Engineering Services (the "Agreement") between St. Lucie County (the "County") and BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. (the "Engineer") dated June 13, 2000, Engineer hereby agrees to provide professional engineering services under the terms and condition set forth in Exhibits "A", "B", and "C" attached hereto and made a part of this Work Authorization. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County and the Engineer have executed this Work Authorization, effective this day of , 2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: BCI ENGINEERS & SCIENTIST, INC. ¥¡}¡~ ¡Y4id - ¡}JJ ø¡¿p~ By: Print Name: ¡:2í jä~/ J?1 ¡;}t,LJ12..0 Ti tle: () M.5I'¿¿ftl-! C:\JWL\AGREE\BCI WA OO.WPD '-' ......, EXHIBIT A ST. LUCIE COUNTY ENGINEERING DIVISION River Park Baffle Boxes Project Scope of Services I. Description St. Lucie County Stormwater Management Services II. Provisions for Work , Engineering services will be accomplished in accordance with the St. Lucie County Continuing Engineering Services Contract. III. Project Description - River Park Baffle Box Design Projects This work will be accomplished in compliance with local water management district requirements. III. Scope of Services BCI will provide project management and engineering services using staff and resources from our Lakeland office to provide full technical support to St. Lucie County. BCI will be assisted by Culpepper & Terpening for survey services for the project. BCI will provide all equipment and materials necessary to conduct these engineering services. It is understood that St. Lucie County has assessed the River Park watershed and determined that two existing priority outfalls, the Bay St. and Prima Vista Blvd. outfalls, are candidates for use of best management practices (BMPs) to reduce pollutant loads to the St. Lucie River. The County has also determined based on available land, budgetary constraints, and other considerations, that the BMP of choice for both drainage catchment areas will be baffle boxes (structural particulate settling units). Therefore BCl will not pursue the use of other BMP applications for these particular drainage catchment areas. Services to be managed and developed during the term of this agreement include: · Prepare location map exhibits and surface water restoration grant application for presentation to the St. Lucie River Issues Team. · Attendance/participation at a St. Lucie River Issues Team presentation meeting. · Topographic survey services at the Prima Vista Blvd. outfall sufficient to allow for design of the settling boxes at this location. a Collect topographic survey information 75' east and west of Structure SD-12 and within the ditch R/W from SD-12 to 100' north of the headwall structure. This will include everything from the gutter (inclusive) and curbs to the R/W line. a Topographic survey will include utilities, including underground (Horizontal & Vertical). a Locate and survey drainage easement and road R/W line for inclusion on topographic survey. Field reconnaissance at both the Bay St. and Prima Vista Blvd. drainage catchment areas (estimated at 150 acres) to assess hydraulic controls within the system. This will EXHIBIT I /41/ ~ ~ Scope of Services Page 2 facilitate more appropriate sizing of the box structures and avoids unnecessary survey work of the drainage areas. . Sediment sample collection and gradation analysis for the purpose of establishing some of the characteristics of the sediments passing through the two outfall systems. Two composite samples will be collected from each outfall location and tested mechanically for gradation and organic content. . One grab sample of the base flow from each outfall will be obtained and analyzed for total suspended solids. This will be conducted a second time in 2001 to allow for additional data points for the "base flow" . . Hydrologic calculations will be made and the baffle boxes designed to maximize the pollutant removal efficiency. At this time it is anticipated that "ultra BMPs" such as a CDS® unit will be cost-prohibitive based on the established budget for this project. This project is scoped assuming a more standard prefabricated box structure will be constructed for Bay St. and for the 42" storm sewer outfall into the junction box at the Prima Vista Blvd. outfall. A constructed "settling sump" is assumed to be the preferred option of choice to be located within the drainage ditch at the northern headwall to the Prima Vista Blvd. crossdrain. Runoff from the curb inlets at the crossdrain and from the 30" pipe west ofthe crossdrain will not be treated, however this represents a small portion of the overall catchment area draining to this outfall. · BCI will contact utility operators (TV Cable and phone) to determine the exact location of those utilities if the topographic survey requires any additional clarification on utility systems that would impact this project. Plans (60%) will be sent to all utility owners to confirm and document utility locations. · The soils investigation will be limited to a shallow soil boring at each ofthe proposed structure locations. · Construction drawings consistent with County and FDOT standards will be prepared for the project sites. The County will be provided a set of 60% plans and 90% plans to comment on prior to final construction plan preparation. Concept sketches will be provided around the 30% preparation phase to allow the County to provide feedback on ideas that are desired and not desired by the County based on input from Engineering and Roads & Bridge Divisions. This will eliminate the possibility for major changes at the 60% phase submittal. · Project specifications will be prepared and provided in a specifications package or will be included in notes on the plans. Specifications, pay item descriptions and summary of quantities will be input into the County's boiler plate bid package and provided back to the County. A construction cost estimate will be included. · Minor construction management assistance time has been assumed to assist County staff with successful construction implementation of the project. This includes an assumed number of hours for shop drawing review, etc. · Permit inquiry (exemption confirmation) will be made to the South Florida Water Management District. We have assumed a permit will not be required. We have assumed ACOE permitting is not required as well. '-" .....; Scope of Services Page 3 . Meetings- We have assumed that 2 meetings will be held with St. Lucie County staff during the project duration. . Project Progress Reports- Monthly status reports will be provided to St. Lucie County. Additionally, w~ anticipate much communication during the design phase to ensure the County has constant input on the proposed design. Items Specifically not Included in the Scope of Work and associated budget include: · Compiling Legal/Institutional Information · FEMA Map Revisions · Agency Permit Application Submittal and/or Permit Fees · Easement Negotiations/Agreements · R/W Map Preparation · Ground Water Modeling · Water Level Monitoring Contamination Assessments · Wetland Delineation or Impacts Assessment · Pre-bid Meeting & Pre-construction Meeting Attendance · Construction Engineering Inspection and Testing IV. Information Provided by St. Lucie County St. Lucie County will provide as-built plans, drainage maps, topographic information and other similar County information. This proposal assumes that as-built information will be sufficient for design at the Bay St. outfall. Should any additional location survey work be required for the Bay St. outfall to support the existing as-built drawing, St. Lucie County will provide those services. Additionally, as-built elevations/ sizes of the downstream portions of the Prima Vista Blvd. cross drain system are also considered adequate for design purposes. V. Period of Service BCI will provide the services for the above scope upon receiving a notice to proceed. The project will be completed with the final deliverable made per the attached project schedule (Exhibit C). ST. LUCIE COUNTY - CONTINUING ENGINIEERINGSERVICES (STORMWATER) BCI LABOR COST AND EXPENSES Project Name: St. Lucie County Project Manager: BCI Project Number: Date: TASK ACTIVITY Grant Preparation Assistance 2 Survey Services 3 Meeting Attendance (assume 1 day for River Issues and 2 meetings w/ client during proj. term) 4 Field ReconnJData Collection/Concept Design SoillWater Laboratory Testing Analysis 5 60% Design and Final Design Per Client Input 6 Permit Exemption Verification Inquiry to SFWMD 7 Project Specifications 8 Incidental Const. Management Assistance Total Work Order Cost TOTAL LUMP SUM COST Work Order 1- River Park Baffle Box Design Michael Wrack, P.E. W1910668.10 1S-Sep-OO Rev 24-0ct-OO Sheet 1 of 1 $749.28 $610.40 I ¡¡f/I I I I I . I I -- (.) 110 -,,- I i I I , , I I I- I r- I f-¡ I ! I -- -- - 1: -- I '~ I I ¡.. I I f-- i . .~ ,- :£ I 6r- ¡¡; I ,.,. ¡", I~: - ü (.!) f-- IJ) r-- (!) - (G - I----- - .9 - "0 " .E I :º:~ i I I I I I , I , ¡: £. 0 ".¡j J ~I Q.. 'i:: (.) '~I IJ) ( ) (!) :¡:¡ e c E1 ~I -¡ü '" .ã: ..... 0 ,.; (.!) '" II> II> '" ~ '" 5"3 ..... I ¡: m ;::¡ (G"O ..... I 0 IX1 (!) ci EXHIBIT J:: () X (.) z 0 ] ;en ~ 1- 1,--- .... a...... ~. ][[ TlI I ¡Ie It :s (.) ... II> :E (!) .~ > 0 I 'I I >< ..,.¡ .- ... w en 0::: 1 a.. - · 4- 1 '-' AGENDA REQUEST -...I ITEM NO. C-2B DATE: December 19, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] PRESENTED BY: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: King Orange 2 MSBU and Skylark 2 MSBU - Potable Water (FPUA) Interlocal Agreements with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and the City of Fort Pierce to Provide Potable Water. BACKGROUND: Attached to this agenda are copies of Interlocal Agreements with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) and the City of Fort Pierce related to the King Orange2 MSBU and Skylark2 MSBU's. Under the Agreements, the County will create the King Orange2 MSBU and Skylark2 MSBU to levy special non-ad valorem assessments to pay for the projects to provide potable water service to King Orange Drive and Skylark Drive. FPUA will design and install the system necessary to provide the water service, and the County will pay FPUA for the cost of the design and installation of the system out of bonds issued to finance the projects. These bonds will be paid off by the assessments levied by the King Orange2 MSBU and Skylark2 MSBU. FUNDS AVAIL.: n/a PREVIOUS ACTION: November 8, 2000 - Board created the MSBUs and authorized the County Engineer to proceed with Engineering and design of the projects. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Interlocal Agreements with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and the City of Fort Pierce to provide potable water to King Orange Drive and Skylark Drive and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreements. COMMISSION ACTION: [2J APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Do sAnderson County Administrator Coordination/Sianatures [X]Public Works Dir: ~~, v/AJ· [] Mgmt & Budget: [] Purchasing: [X] County Attorney: [X] Co Eng: [] Finance Dir: [] Other: cc: Finance Director OMB Manager ~ "wi INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT KING ORANGE2 MSBU THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of , 2000, by and between St. Lucie County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (the II County II ), the Fort pierce utilities Authority, an authority created and established by the City Commission of the City of Fort Pierce, Florida, ("FPUA") and the City of Fort Pierce, a municipality organized under the laws of the State of Florida (the "City"). WHEREAS, FPUA is the governing body authorized to enter into agreements relating to providing service from the potable water supply of the CitYi and, WHEREAS, the County intends to create the King Orange2 municipal services benefit unit (the liKing Orange2 MSBU") to fund the cost of providing potable water to King Orange Drive in unincorporated St. Lucie County. A description of the boundaries of the real property within the proposed MSBU is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "Alii and, WHEREAS, the parties believe that it is in their mutual best interest to cooperate in providing potable water to King Orange Drive. -1- ~ ..."" NOW, THEREFORE, FPUA, the City, and the County hereby agree and covenant on the terms and conditions hereinafter stated: 1. GENERAL. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Section 163. aI, Florida Statutes, the Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act. This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of the parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained therein, and this Agreement shall supersede all previous telecommunications, representations, or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties hereto. 2 . FPUA RESPONSIBILITIES. this Agreement are as follows: FPUA IS responsibilities under A. FPUA shall design and install or cause to be designed and installed a system including all pipes, services, mains and appurtenances thereto (the "System") necessary to provide potable water to King Orange Drive. The design and installation of the System shall be done in accordance with all applicable, standard FPUA policies and procedures. The County reserves the right to review and approve the utilities plans and bid documents before inclusion in the bid package. B. If easements are required, FPUA shall attempt to obtain all necessary easements for installation and maintenance of the System. FPUA shall not be required, however, to condemn any such easements or expend funds for acquisition of same. If appropriate easements satisfactory to FPUA are not obtained, FPUA shall have no further obligation under this Agreement. C. FPUA shall administer a proj ect to install the System to include but not limited to awarding the contract for design, construction, inspection during construction, shop drawing approvals, change order approvals, proj ect certification, and production of record drawings. D. Upon completion of the System and acceptance of ownership of the System by FPUA, FPUA shall be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the System. E. Prior to the second public hearing to be held by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners pursuant to Section 1-13.5-7 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinance to adopt a -2- '-' ..., preliminary assessment roll for the King Orange2 MSBU, FPUA shall provide an itemized final estimated cost (the "Final Estimated Cost") for the installation of the System to the County. The Final Estimated Cost shall include the cost of testing, permits, surveying, legal, design, construction, contingencies allowance, construction administration, certification, record drawings, and acquisition of easements for the installation of the System and shall be subject to the approval of the County. Any unexpected costs incurred during the construction and installation of the System beyond the Final Estimated Cost shall be the responsibility of FPUA. F. If the County does not levy a special non-ad valorem assessment as described below, FPUA shall be responsible for the cost of all design or other work done by FPUA related to the System. The County shall use its best efforts to notify FPUA as soon as possible of any decision not to levy an assessment. 3. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES. In the event the County determines at a public hearing to create a MSBU and to levy a non- ad valorem special assessment, the County's responsibilities under this Agreement are as follows: A. The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida shall act as the governing body of the King Orange2 MSBU and shall levy a non-ad valorem special assessment (the "Assessment") on the landowners within the limits of the MSBU to fund the cost of the installation of the System as required for connection to the FPUA water system. B. The County shall pay to FPUA an amount not to exceed the Final Estimated Cost for the installation of the System. All other applicable fees and charges for connection to the FPUA water system will be the responsibility of the landowners. Payment by the County to FPUA shall be within 30 working days after the County has obtained funds from the issuance of bonds to finance the project and after the approval of the costs by the St. Lucie County Director of Engineering or his designee. C. Upon the request of FPUA, the County I s Property Acquisition Division shall provide staff assistance to FPUA for the acquisition of easements necessary for the installation and maintenance of the System. -3- '-' .-..1 4. TERMINATION. Unless terminated by the mutual written agreement of all parties, this agreement shall remain in full force and effect until all of its terms and conditions have been met. 5. NOTICE OF CITY ANNEXATION REQUIREMENT. The following notice is required by the City and should not be construed in any way as an endorsement of the City's annexation policies by the County. As a condition precedent for connection to the FPUA water system, FPUA requires all users to sign an annexation agreement whereby the user consents to and requests that his or her property be annexed into the city limits of Fort Pierce whenever such annexation may legally occur and that the FPUA will refuse to allow connection to its water system unless and until the referenced annexation agreement is signed. This annexation agreement shall be in the form utilized by FPUA, shall be irrevocable and shall be binding on the heirs, successors and assigns of all such users. 6 . CONSENT TO COUNTY MSBU UPON ANNEXATION. The par tie s acknowledge that if the King Orange2 MSBU is annexed into the City this will result in the existence of a St. Lucie County Municipal Services Benefit Unit within the jurisdictional boundary of the City. Accordingly, the City agrees that if it intends to annex the King Orange2 MSBU into the City, it will include within the appropriate annexation ordinance a statement that the City consents to the existence of the King Orange2 Municipal Services Benefit Unit within the boundaries of the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.01(q}, Florida Statutes or other applicable law. 7. VALIDATION OF BOND AND ASSESSMENT ROLL. A condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement is the entry of a Final Judgment (and the expiration of the appropriate appeal period) by a court of competent jurisdiction validating the issuance of bonds to finance the System along with ~he assessment roll adopted by the Board (the "Bond Validation Proceeding"). In the event that either a Final Judgment validating the bonds and assessment roll is not entered or an appellate court reverses the Final Judgment, the Agreement shall automatically terminate and the parties shall have no further responsibilities under the Agreement including but not limited to any payments due to FPUA by the County. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if either a Final Judgment validating the bonds and assessment roll is not entered or an appellate court reverses the Final Judgment, the County reserves the right to be reimbursed by FPUA for all outside counsel legal -4- ~ 'wi fees and costs incurred by the County in the Bond Validation Proceeding as well as in any related appeal. The County agrees to consult with FPUA concerning the expenditure of money for outside bond counsel services related to the Bond Validation Proceeding and further agrees that such expenditure shall not exceed five thousand and nO/lOO dollars ($5000.00) without the express written consent of FPUA. The County's right to reimbursement shall survive the termination of this Agreement as described in this paragraph. 8. NOTICE. All notices or other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given if delivered in person or sent by certified mail return receipt requested and addressed as follows: If to County: With a copy to: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 With a copy to: St. Lucie County Public Works Director 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 If to FPUA: With a copy to: Director of Utilities Fort pierce Utilities Authority P.O. Box 3191 Fort Pierce, Florida 34948 FPUA Attorney P. O. Box 3191 Fort Pierce, Florida 34948 If to the City: City Manager City of Fort Pierce 100 North U.S. One Fort Pierce, Florida 34950 With a copy to: Fort Pierce City Attorney P. O. Box 3779 Fort Pierce, Florida 33448 9. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter -5- ~ ......, hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreement between the parties with respect hereto. This Agreement may only be amended by a written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by the parties hereto. This Agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. 10. FILING. This Agreement and any subsequent amendments thereto shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County pursuant to Section 163.01(11), Florida Statutes. (THE NEXT PAGE IS THE SIGNATURE PAGE) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the execution by their duly authorized officials. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Coun ty Attorney,) / , I I I RCE ~(L*TI~ Af~ORITY ¡ ~'w ,~\ /. / ,~/ C IRMAN ITrlLiUL BY APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: ffl,/'- I~ ~ Attorney for FPUA -6- '-' ATTEST: ~'. . ~~:~ CITY CLERK g\wp\msbu\King Orange2\interloc "-' CITY BY: S TO FORM AND ECTNESS: -7- W' """ EXHIBIT "A" MAP OF MSBU ~ï ,--=-.]I~ ª-= ~~~'-:so ~ g--=--ß _ 3().~ ~ 2:5 ~ 2:S ~ ,.n I 2 -4 I 2:9 ~ ~12~ : 2 ':5 2 29 2 -4 2 "! I is-if 2ß ~ 2 5 2 2ß 2 5 ~ 2ß ~ 5 g 2ß '] 2 5 2 I 125 _ 125 0 ° 125 125 125 I~ 27'~ ~, 166.67, I- - - - 125 - II ~ :5 ~ ° ", -,:: ~ ¡ ;5 2 125' § ~ 6~ i 2T . 2 4( !- ~~ _ ~ ':: ~ 2 6 ~ ~ ffi 7 01 26 i ëE 2 7 2Þ 2 ~ ~, 7 j I 2Þ ~. 7 g 26 g ~. 0 7 0 to! e I 0 ° 125 0 4( 83.3~ ¡41.8 -ß 5 125 125 Q 4Ø 4Ø ~ tr"8 '" ~ 25 125 125 Z 12_:) 25 8 2S ~I 125 Ð 125 2 w 52~ 0512S,-S! 2 J~ 2 rr:. 125 ~ 125 ~ trn1252 ~ -",8~ ~ o I 0 9 0 ~ 24 ° ~.~ 9 -,:I U 24 ~ 0 9 0 I ~ 2.4 0 0 9 ~ 24 0 ° U IW ~ 125 é) 125 4Ø....I 125 125 4Ø 125 4Ø 125 40 4Ø 125 ~ ·125 40 <D 9 2 ~. I If) ~ ZJ 2 10 ZJ 10 Z3 ~ 10 ° Z3 0 ~:;~ I 0 ~ 125 ~ _ ~ _ _ 0 125 4Ø 125 4Ø <D frïï·~ ~ Z2 ¡ t; II 22'~ Q-::-~ - 2.22 0 II 0 2.2 ~ /I 0 I 125 125 w 125 125 ~"'" ... <D 125 4Ø 125 2 40 3t: f---I--- 1---- I 0 12. 0 ° 2J 2 12 2,_ 2J 0 12 2J 0 12 0 2J 0 ~ 12 0 é) 125 é) 01 _ ~ 125 IV 125 <Ø 125 4Ø 125 4Ø 40 I .0:: 2J)-ti o [j 0 125 2 13 2 12" ~ 13 20 "': 0 13 0 . 20 0 I ~ 125 to 2J) 125 .. -. <'I 4Ø '125 4Ø 125 40 -- ---~125"-i:ì 10/4 il9i ~/4 I9t;JH /9!=! 0140190 <D 125 _ _ <D 125 4Ø 125 4Ø 1.,.-,,- I-- - ~ - - I---:. -¡;...."OIS I G) 10 t! ~ 29:!I........_ ~ 5 <'It ('oj 15 '" -" ., I f8 g ~ I,,: ~ Ò 18 15 .~" 0\ I.;; oÕ "".... .;; :¡: I'" 125 I--~~ ~__ ,_ ~__~..35-;:; <Ø_-= ~16 lTe¿ <jf6 J7~"^~/6 ~J7~ ~f6 J7~r 8 6~ I"': 125 - ~ SO? 125 125 .... '^' ~ 125 ~ 125 00 I~ 125 125 ~I ~ ~ 125.5 !? ~ ~ ~ KING ORANGE DRIVE ~ .3-40.17 100 100 t10 f. '8 110 . 110 226.29 226.29 (601- (61)1- 0 (6/)/- 0 (6f)/- 0 {601- 0 (60J-()()/6- 0 (60/-00/6- 0 ~, (60HX)16-(}()()/1) ~ m6--1 ~/§:Jt~~ ,Q¿~ 00/6-:! - (}I(M})- oj -e2W-JJ--, - - - - - - (J/0/8J lSJ/5J 0SQ/2J (J4{J/:lJ I QJQ/bJ 0.73 Ac 0.7.3 Ac _ 3K.1-0- "" -m- ~.m.- -m-1-1*)..-- ~~ -+--~ - - -- . - - ........."T T""- . ...,. ...,..- ..,.. - 7- -.¡;--- ~ ~-.!...-~-32~50t} 1 213141516\78\9\10\11 12 ~() t-42~ ~ I 2 -; 3/; __I\~. 84 I U IS4 601 do- \60 65 3 ~ ~~ 125 125 _I 4 ~-o I JO 2 ~ NORTH LAKE DRivE.. 6.13 ~ .~ 12~ ¡-: C) &.. J 2 ~ 125 _ ~'}Q _ .. " 87.87 11<4..33 , ('oj 14 _ _ 380' 2 I 12~ 2 29 £ ,4. ~ f70H:xxxJ..oI(J-721 Q ~ I ~ 8 ~ ~ 2 12~ 2 39 2 I 4 125 //. -"'--440 -â.. \~ ~ t-~ --~ 125- 650' .n.... I 85 i2 28 2 ~ /~ Iä: 2 9;t 0 15 ºIt! 38 "! 125 125 I 0 87.87 113.03 ~ -iJ f't- ,.,. ....õ I I ~Æ~&~ 2 6 2 27 £ /, .L. I 0 3 g /0 0 125~ 360' 2 I 12~ 125 W I I .... 112.3G 112.3G.... l:t 36-é!. W 2f5 > \ rrOI-QOOI- C"4 W ~ 17 ~ _ ~ I 0 7 9. 9. ~ 8. .L-I ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ ~ If g 9. _ 0 w;... :t- - -:J - - ~ êS \.,!!!?"') ; ..J 1t1.604 t11.6-4 ~ ~ 18 -¡:I I J5 i1J g ~ -- --'-...... _ ..--' ~ 5 ~ 12 0 ~ 125 2 ~ ~ I 9 2 24 2 ~ B ~ ----,--- I- 1t1.10 n1.10.... t; ~ 19 2 J4 I - - 125 115 325 ' ~ IJ 0 t- -1:5- i- - ~ ZJ 0 w 70 11ðO 10) 120 70 W g 6 ~.... 125 I KJ ~ ~ 125 <D ~ Iß· I ~.' 110..5 Ii- ZO.:.¡ JJ ~ I ~ - ~ J ;/ ~ 2 I J 4 ~ -S8 T 6 t} 7 ~ ~-;:t /4 ~ z 125 2 J7 2 f/ ~ Z2 ~ 70 I \ðO I 1io 70!lO 1Og.76 1Og.76~ ~ 2J 12~ I----\E...:... Q:2""22~ /2 21 I- ~ SOUTH LAKE DRIVE ~ ~ 12~ ~ _ I ~ ß ~I~ 2õ""""& (111 wt22 163.22163.2~ 120 44 169.221 86" I ett·60 186~ I ~ ZJ JO ~ ~ 125 125 ~ I~ I I 2 ~I J ~I 4 ~I !i I 6 ~I 7 ~\ 8 ~\9 IfO~ I 1I;ç - ~ ~ .rr- - - )..~ 5- ~ 'Jl 6 $ IJ 0 4Ø --- o 14 c:;¡ 4~ ~ J: (601 !; lea o en ,.. <0 Ñ N on ~ .., I cõ ~ u ~ 1 ~ I -- &0 l6Qg L- Jo I I I £; I I I r- I I I ~ I I L_ I 1 ~ ....., INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT SKYLARK2 MSBU THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of , 2000, by and between St. Lucie County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (the "County"), the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority, an authority created and established by the City Commission of the City of Fort Pierce, Florida, (I1FPUA") and the City of Fort pierce, a municipality organized under the laws of the State of Florida (the "City"). WHEREAS, FPUA is the governing body authorized to enter into agreements relating to providing service from the potable water supply of the CitYi and, WHEREAS, the County intends to create the Skylark2 municipal services benefit unit (the "Skylark2 MSBU") to fund the cost of providing potable water to Skylark Drive in unincorporated St. Lucie County. A description of the boundaries of the real property within the proposed MSBU is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "Alii and, WHEREAS, the parties believe that it is in their mutual best interest to cooperate in providing potable water to Skylark Drive. NOW, THEREFORE, FPUA, the City, and the County hereby agree and covenant on the terms and conditions hereinafter stated: -1- ~ .."" 1. GENERAL. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Section 163.01, Florida Statutes, the Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act. This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of the parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained therein, and this Agreement shall supersede all previous telecommunications, representations, or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties hereto. 2 . FPUA RESPONSIBILITIES. this Agreement are as follows: FPUA IS responsibilities under A. FPUA shall design and install or cause to be designed and installed a system including all pipes, services, mains and appurtenances thereto (the "System") necessary to provide potable water to Skylark Drive. The design and installation of the System shall be done in accordance with all applicable, standard FPUA policies and procedures. The County reserves the right to review and approve the utilities plans and bid documents before inclusion in the bid package. B. If easements are required, FPUA shall attempt to obtain all necessary easements for installation and maintenance of the System. FPUA shall not be required, however, to condemn any such easements or expend funds for acquisition of same. If appropriate easements satisfactory to FPUA are not obtained, FPUA shall have no further obligation under this Agreement. C. FPUA shall administer a proj ect to install the System to include but not limited to awarding the contract for design, construction, inspection during construction, shop drawing approvals, change order approvals, project certification, and production of record drawings. D. Upon completion of the System and acceptance of ownership of the System by FPUA, FPUA shall be responsible for the operation and maintenance of the System. E. Prior to the second public hearing to be held by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners pursuant to Section 1-13.5-7 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinance to adopt a -2 - '-' 'wi preliminary assessment roll for the Skylark2 MSBU, FPUA shall provide an itemized final estimated cost (the "Final Estimated Cost") for the installation of the System to the County. The Final Estimated Cost shall include the cost of testing, permits, surveying, legal, design, construction, contingencies allowance, construction administration, certification, record drawings, and acquisition of' easements for the installation of the System and shall be subject to the approval of the County. Any unexpected costs incurred during the construction and installation of the System beyond the Final Estimated Cost shall be the responsibility of FPUA. F. If the County does not levy a special non-ad valorem assessment as described below, FPUA shall be responsible for the cost of all design or other work done by FPUA related to the System. The County shall use its best efforts to notify FPUA as soon as possible of any decision not to levy an assessment. 3. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES. In the event the County determines at a public hearing to create a MSBU and to levy a non- ad valorem special assessment, the County's responsibilities under this Agreement are as follows: A. The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida shall act as the governing body of the Skylark2 MSBU and shall levy a non-ad valorem special assessment (the "Assessment") on the landowners within the limits of the MSBU to fund the cost of the installation of the System as required for connection to the FPUA water system. B. The County shall pay to FPUA an amount not to exceed the Final Estimated Cost for the installation of the System. All other applicable fees and charges for connection to the FPUA water system will be the responsibility of the landowners. Payment by the County to FPUA shall be within 30 working days after the County has obtained funds from the issuance of bonds to finance the project and after the approval of the costs by the St. Lucie County Director of Engineering or his designee. C. Upon the request of FPUA, the County I s Property Acquisition Division shall provide staff assistance to FPUA for the acquisition of easements necessary for the installation and maintenance of the System. -3- '-" '-" 4. TERMINATION. Unless terminated by the mutual written agreement of all parties, this agreement shall remain in full force and effect until all of its terms and conditions have been met. 5. NOTICE OF CITY ANNEXATION REQUIREMENT. The following notice is required by the City and should not be construed in any way as an endorsement of the City's annexation policies by the County. As a condition precedent for connection to the FPUA water system, FPUA requires all users to sign an annexation agreement whereby the user consents to and requests that his or her property be annexed into the city limits of Fort Pierce whenever such annexation may legally occur and that the FPUA will refuse to allow connection to its water system unless and until the referenced annexation agreement is signed. This annexation agreement shall be in the form utilized by FPUA, shall be irrevocable and shall be binding on the heirs, successors and assigns of all such users. 6 . CONSENT TO COUNTY MSBU UPON ANNEXATION. The par tie s acknowledge that if the Skylark2 MSBU is annexed into the City this will result in the existence of a St. Lucie County Municipal Services Benefit Unit within the jurisdictional boundary of the City. Accordingly, the City agrees that if it intends to annex the Skylark2 MSBU into the City, it will include within the appropriate annexation ordinance a statement that the City consents to the existence of the Skylark2 Municipal Services Benefit Unit within the boundaries of the City pursuant to the provisions of Section 125.01(q), Florida Statutes or other applicable law. 7. VALIDATION OF BOND AND ASSESSMENT ROLL. A condition precedent to the effectiveness of this Agreement is the entry of a Final Judgment (and the expiration of the appropriate appeal period) by a court of competent jurisdiction validating the issuance of bonds to finance the System along with the assessment roll adopted by the Board (the "Bond Validation Proceeding"). In the event that either a Final Judgment validating the bonds and assessment roll is not entered or an appellate court reverses the Final Judgment, the Agreement shall automatically terminate and the parties shall have no further responsibilities under the Agreement including but not limited to any payments due to FPUA by the County. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if either a Final Judgment validating the bonds and assessment roll is not entered or an appellate court reverses the Final Judgment, the County reserves the right to be reimbursed by FPUA for all outside counsel legal -4- ~ ....,I fees and costs incurred by the County in the Bond Validation Proceeding as well as in any related appeal. The County agrees to consult with FPUA concerning the expenditure of money for outside bond counsel services related to the Bond Validation Proceeding and further agrees that such expenditure shall not exceed five thousand and nO/100 dollars ($5000.00) without the express written consent of FPUA. The County's right to reimbursement shall survive the termination of this Agreement as described in this paragraph. 8. NOTICE. All notices or other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given if delivered in person or sent by certified mail return receipt requested and addressed as follows: If to County: With a copy to: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 With a copy to: St. Lucie County Public Works Director 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 If to FPUA: With a copy to: Director of Utilities Fort Pierce Utilities Authority P.O. Box 3191 Fort Pierce, Florida 34948 FPUA Attorney P. O. Box 3191 Fort Pierce, Florida 34948 If to the City: City Manager City of Fort Pierce 100 North U.S. One Fort Pierce, Florida 34950 With a copy to: Fort Pierce City Attorney P. O. Box 3779 Fort Pierce, Florida 33448 9. ENTIRE AGREEMENT. This Agreement constitutes the entire Agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter -5- ~ ..., hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreement between the parties with respect hereto. This Agreement may only be amended by a written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by the parties hereto. This Agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. 10. FILING. This Agreement and any subsequent amendments thereto shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County pursuant to Section 163.01(11), Florida Statutes. (THE NEXT PAGE IS THE SIGNATURE PAGE) IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the execution by their duly authorized officials. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney) / fft'LLmL FORT. piERCE 1fiT~is ¡(UTHORI. TY I j / ' 11 ,/, ~ , ';' I ' Byr-,-, Ill,! ()iÁ!) / ,~ / ' I CHÁIRMAN ',- APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: o¿" ,A- /¿;¿L-~ Attorney for FPUA -6- '-" ATTEST: ~'-Þ ~. CITY CLERK g\wp\msbu\Skylark2\interloc -7- "'-" CITY RCE BY: MAYOR TO FORM AND CTNESS: <tt!_ -. 3c' 2 I .. I I I .2 ~ <.N ....0.11 100 . 100 no, to no 110 2U.2. 226.2. I· ¿ (60J-0016-{}(J()/l) 1 ::';'.1~L~J.~..J Mlf;. ~ (6OHJOJ6- 0 -!2.~£t_2 ~ Q!0/8J (i;l)/Sj ()5()/2J 04IJ/::IJ '(ß()/6J -(}If.J/fJJ-'¡ ~..n- ~ .1.11- -3U.10-_ - .~ - ~ ..,. "..,. 0.73 Ac . 0.73 Ac ~~- ,~ ----- -- -~~- -~--I-_~~- - -~ - ¡.. ~ ~ 41 ff4 , . . +-IH.. R~ flU. tn. An f An 1" ' / 64.¿ 12~ ""_I 5( I i 3Z I -T ."1" . '- r ¡¡ I ;. 2 ~ -:;- -! !SO ¡¡,/ '.1 3 I 4 "5 I 6 I 7 8 I 9 I" I. 12 ¡f '" ~~ II! .. I..", I '125 125 ~ &41 '44 I 84 I ~ 184 801 M 180 65 13 t: ~~ ~ L I '0 J S2 ~ ~ ~ ~ NORTH LAKE DRIVE.:; G.13 ~ '~12~ g- ";jõ -¡ do I a. - '" 1,' }2"", 87..7 ,..... 125 I S . "i ¡¡ ~ ¡¡ A 1'3 j10FóixxiõìCf-72\ S t'::; 8 :¡!SO 2~: ¡¡- :; -;; I '&"5 80 Z8 0 ~ 1¡).../ -'440 ....... ì ~ ~ -1 _ _ ~ ~ -..:..:: I 40 40 /, I ~ Z 9 ~. 15 I ~~ 125 125 f' , 0 87.ft7 11.3.03 ~ 0 II! 38 "! CIJ I 6 ~ 21 ~ I 16 ~ ~ ""rr ~ ., ~ I 2 125 125 w"/ .~ I ~ J R 10 ~ 125~ ~'~ I > II. I7Q'/-(}OOI/- I '-' 1t2.JQ It2...3Q rIf -;; ~ I 7 Z5 - ifill ,('<.... fl ~V<1~ ~ - ~ - - ~ ~ \ 000/8) ~ I ~ ~ ~ 4 ~ 33 /I R 12.. _ 0 ~ I 2.... I 8 i<1 2S........_ ! -' 1ttð4 t1l4-4 t; I- 18 ~. r ~ 125 I U 125 115----___...... _" w 125 2 35 2 I 24 J -~--__-/ ~ 5 ~ 12 ~:= 'US _, , I f- ~ ~ 125 ~ ~ ~ ~I 325 ~ 1tt1O 1tt.10 (I) ¡ . J9 2 J4 I 0 10 ç ~ Z3, ~ ~ 70 T WJ 10'1 I~O 70 W g 6 :S' JJ R f- ~- i- ü5 ...¡ I' ~ L .. 12~ < ß as ~. nO.45 10 20 0 _.J.J ' · "'-;;.. 8 22 8 .J ¡¡/j¡ , I 3 /4 j¡ 5 16 ¡¡ 7 ¡¡ $-; $ 14::¡ z I"- 125"':r;¡¡ I · - - - - ø ~ 70 I..., I do 70 I!SO 100.7. ....,. ~ ~ ¡¡- 7fT 125 I · 12 21 £ SOUTH LAKE DRIVE £ ~ ~ ¡j 31 L ~ I :¡ '3 ~ 8 '" ¡;: ~ mp2 "-'-22 <3", ~.. ....2..., ~.oo I.... > 2J :;;; _ _125 12~ :J;en 1 c() c() ~ Ion c() ~ lenl on ~ f! 1 I /9 ~ I 2 t:I J t:I -f ~ 5 6 t:I 7 t:I 8 I~ 9 IOt:I /I ~ - ~ - ~ - - .J. · :¡ :;. ¡¡ '" ¡¡ "" '" 8.1 t 0 I§ .. ..., I 0...,. I.... ,~ . 24 ~!L 29 . ~ ff. ~ 12/5", ~ 18 £ I ðJ ðJ t G ðJ 93.01 fL7- ~ 28- ~ æ It) I ... 125 , I~. ~ *' t:::. O-.~~'~ en ZZ I z¡ on 2!i'n 1/9 en 18 en IT I/) J6 15 I/) 14 I/) /J I IZ on ~ __ ~ --.: _ _ tD I 40 J6 "1 f! en t:I t:I t:I t1 t:I t:I $::! t:I ~ '1 'zs . , ::¡ ~ ~ '" I!! '" ~!SO 13217. .2."'..,.7.....7..2.111 do. .... ,,12.00 50 S 12' ~ ~ 3 ~ ¡¡~' :;¡ 12· £ REVELS LANE <0 £ 21[ I ~ 0 8 'ot-~ m t::: I I l- I I I '") , t::: I 1 - ~ ;)- ·3j '-' '-" 6 1 £ 21 1 2: ~ (60/, Ii) 0:) 02 ~ 2~ 0> 0 " ~ ~ ~ EXHIBIT "A" MAP OF MSBU So' ~ )0' S ~ 60 60 ~ 60 ~ Z J en rr-- ~ 12~ 1.3 ~ I/o ~ "~IZ t; /J 1/4 ~ /5; 16 ~ fl; 18 ~ 60 60 d) ð{) GO GO o ~ .w 59iÇ 3fJ 1J7~ .J6 þ5~ 1:10 27 ~26 ~ FRA-MAR .~6 ~.~ PLACE ~ N q - - --w .... --- - '-' AGENDA REQUEST -...I ITEM NO. C-2C DATE: December19,2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION SUBJECT: King Orange2 MSBU and Skylark2 MSBU- Potable Water(FPUA) Interlocal Agreements with the Property Appraiser and Tax Collector BACKGROUND: See Attached Memorandum FUNDS AVAIL. N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Interlocal Agreements and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreements. [ i APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: RRENCE: COMMISSION ACTION: ouglas M. Anderson County Administrator [X] County Attorney: ~94 \' '¿¿J ,/ I '-'" Coordination/Siqnatures [X] Public Works Dir: [] Mgmt & Budget: [X] Co Eng: /'I¡VP /D B W . [] purchas ing : [] Finance Dir: [] Other: -~ ~ T'.". .,., '-' "'" COMMISSION REVIEW: December 19, 2000 ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 00-413 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners County Engineer f\AVP! P8rv December 8,2000 King Orange2 MSBU and Skylark2 MSBU - Potable Water (FPUA) Interlocal Agreements with the Property Appraiser and Tax Collector BACKGROUND Attached are draft Interlocal Agreements with the Property Appraiser and Tax Collector for the referenced Municipal Service Benefit Unit ("MSBU"). The Agreement with the Property Appraiser allow for the Property Appraiser to provide the County with certain information and for the County to reimburse the Property Appraiser for their necessary administrative costs incurred under Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes (2000). The Agreement with the Tax Collector allow the County to reimburse the Tax Collector for their necessary administrative costs incurred under Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes (2000). Both Agreements are required by Section 197, Florida Statutes which gives the authority to create MSBU's. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board approve the Interlocal Agreements and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreements. BP cc: Staff Concurring Property Appraiser Tax Collector Finance Director OMB Manag~r' g\wp\msbu\kingorang2\aga-tcpa.wpd '-'" ....., INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT KING ORANGE2 MUNICIPAL SERVICES UNIT THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT is made and entered into this _day of ,20_, by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA (the "County") and DOROTHY JO CONRAD, as St. Lucie County Tax Collector (the "Tax Collector"). WHEREAS, the County intends to levy non-ad valorem special assessments against certain properties within the King Orange2 Municipal Services Benefit Unit (the "King Orange2 MSBU") in unincorporated St. Lucie County for the purpose of funding a project to provide potable water to the properties within the King Orange2 MSBU; and WHEREAS, the County intends to use the unifonn method for the levy, collection and enforcement ofthe non-ad valorem assessments pursuant to Chapter 197, Florida Statutes (2000); and WHEREAS, the County and the Tax Collector have agreed to enter into a written agreement whereby the County will reimburse the Tax Collector for her necessary administrative costs incurred under Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes (2000) in providing this infonnation related to the King Orange2 MSBU. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenant, conditions and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Sections 197.3632 and 163.01, Florida Statutes (2000). This Agreement embodies the whole understanding ofthe parties. There are no promises, tenns, conditions, or obligations other than those contained herein, and this Agreement shall supersede all previous telecommunications, representations, or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties hereto. 2. The above representations are true and correct and incorporated herein. 3. The parties agree that commencing with the 2001 tax year, for a period of twenty (20) years the County shall: a. Provide written notice to the Tax Collector, which notice shall include a certified copy of the Resolution creating the assessment. b. Provide the Tax Collector with copies of all other resolutions relating to the King Orange2 MSBU, including but not limited to any resolution authorizing a change in the amount of the special assessment levied against any parcel of property within the King Orange2 MSBU. c. The County shall, in writing, notify the tax collector of the representative (s) authorized to submit a correction on DR Fonn 409A. The County shall also notify the tax collector in writing, of the official authorized to submit the factors. '\ ...... ...., d. Provide the tax collector thirty (30) days prior to presentation of certified rolls, with all proposed details regarding yearly billing, prepays, payoffs during term, payoffs after first billing (i.e; amortization) and other costs that may be added after prepays. The parties mutually agree to negotiate a format that is acceptable to both parties. The tax collector reserves the right to reject the proposed format of the data ifit is not compatible with the current collection system and she has not been involved in the development of the format. e. Certify a non-ad valorem assessment roll on compatible electronic medium to the tax collector on or before September 15 ofthe first year. The assessment roll shall contain the posting of the non-ad valorem for each parcel and contain the following information for all real property located within the boundaries of King Orange2 MSBU: (1) the St. Lucie County Property Appraiser's parcel number; (2) the property description: and, (3) any other information as may be mutually agreed to. Such roll certified to the tax collector shall be a separate assessment roll showing the amount of the special assessment applied to each parcel with the King Orange2 MSBU, including any parcels for which no special assessments were levied. The certified special assessment roll shall show the total of all special assessments for the King Orange2 MSBU. If any changes to the MSBU roll need to be made, it shall be the responsibility of the County to file a corrected roll or a correction of the amount of any assessment. f. All assessments shall become liens by operation oflaw as specified in Section 197.122 F.S. (2000). No liens shall be recorded outside Section 197.122 F.S. 4. The parties agree that commencing with the 2001 tax year, for a period of twenty (20) years, the tax collector will collect and disburse the King Orange2 assessments. Specifically the tax collector shall: a. Produce and pay for combined notice of ad valorem taxes and non-ad valorem assessments pursuant to the requirements of 197.3635 F.S. b. Collect all special assessments complying with the provisions oftms agreement, and remit the funds to the County on a monthly basis, less the deductions allowed in paragraph 5 oftms agreement. c. Deposit all collections of special assessments in the same account used for collection of ad valorem taxes; however, the tax collector shall provide a statement to the County showing the amount of special assessments collected. 2 '-' ....., 5. The County agrees to reimburse the Tax Collector in accordance with Sections 197.3632 (2), and 192.091 Florida Statutes (2000) for necessary administrative costs, if any, incurred in connection with the Municipal Services Benefit Unit. Administrative costs shall include but not be limited to those costs associated with personnel, fonns, supplies, data processing, computer equipment, postage, and programming. The parties acknowledge and agree that a good faith estimate of the cost of collection, based on prior experience with like projects, exceeds two percent (2%) ofJhe total collection. However, in order to keep project costs as low as possible, the tax collector agrees to accept two percent (2%) of the collection as her reimbursement. 6. If, due to unusual or extenuating circumstances, the tax collector's necessary administration costs of perfonning the services required by this agreement exceed the usual and expected compensation provided for in paragraph 5 above, the County agrees to pay any additional sums required to fully reimburse the tax collector for her necessary administrative costs as documented by the tax collector. 7. The parties acknowledge that the tax collector is entering this agreement without any detennination that the County is legally authorized or qualified to collect its non-ad valorem assessments pursuant to Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes. It is understood that it is her ministerial duty and she has no authority to refuse that duty; question compliance with Chapter 197 Florida Statute; detennine the legality of the assessment or detennine the constitutionality of any lien resulting from nonpayment of the assessment. In recognition of all of the above, the County shall, to the extent pennitted by law, indemnify and save harmless and defend the Tax Collector, its agents, servants, and employees from and against any and all claims, liability, losses, or causes of action which may arise from any misconduct, improper action, negligent act or omission of the County, its servants, or employees in the performance of services under this Agreement. 8. This agreement may be tenninated by either party, without cause, upon one hundred eighty (180) days written notice prior to November 1 of each year. Any tennination ofthis agreement shall not affect the tax collector's responsibilities for tax years prior to the date oftennination. 9. Any alteration, variation, modification, extension, renewal, or waiver of the provisions of this agreement shall be valid only when reduced to writing, duly authorized and signed by all parties. Any amendment will be entered prior to January 1 of the tax year in which such amendm~nt is to become effective. This agreement and any subsequent amendments shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court for St. Lucie County pursuant to Section 163.01 (11), Florida Statutes (2000). 10. This agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit and all interpretations shall be governed by the laws ofthe State of Florida. 11. All notices or other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given if delivered in person or sent by certified mail return receipt requested and addressed as follows: 3 - -.-... ......... ...., '-" "-tI If to the County: With a copy to: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 If to the Tax Collector: With a copy to: St. Lucie County Tax Collector 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Tax Collector Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 THE NEXT PAGE IS THE SIGNATURE PAGE 4 .,., .. -.-........ ......., '-' ..""" IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have duly executed this agreement the day and year noted below. ATTEST: DEPUTY CLERK WITNESSES: þl Ü ,,>-OIl.. tJuVì'v'-Pk,"-ILLP I a<,~)A 4z-JuLU BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ST. LUCIE COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR ~ TAXC Date: \'} _ oj. <)0 . APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: ~~~ ~~~ TAX COL CTOR ORNEY 5 '-' 'wi INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT KING ORANGE2 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 20_, by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA (the "County") and DOUGLAS S. PUTNAM, as St. Lucie County Property Appraiser (the "Property Appraiser"). WHEREAS, the County intends to levy non-ad valorem special assessments against certain properties within the King Orange2 Municipal Services Benefit Unit (the "King Orange2 MSBU") in unincorporated St. Lucie County for the purpose of funding a project to provide potable water service to properties within the King Orange2 MSBU; and WHEREAS, the County intends to use the uniform method for the levy, collection and enforcement of the non-ad valorem assessments pursuant to Chapter 197, Florida Statutes (2000); and WHEREAS, the County and the Property Appraiser have agreed to enter into a written agreement whereby the Property Appraiser will provide the County with certain information and the County will reimburse the Property Appraiser for his necessary administrative costs incurred under Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes (2000) in providing this information related to the King Orange2 MSBU. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. GENERAL. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Section 197.3632 and 163.01, Florida Statutes (2000). This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of the parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained herein, and this Agreement shall supersede all previous telecommunications, representations, or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties hereto. PROPERTY APPRAISER. Annually prior to June 1, the Property Appraiser shall provide the County with the information described in Section 197.3632 (3) (b), Florida Statutes (2000), for the King Orange2 MSBU. This information shall be provided by list or compatible electronic medium and shall include the legal description of the properties within the boundaries of the King Orange2 MSBU and the names and addresses of the owners of such properties. This information shall reference the property identification number and otherwise conform in format to that contained on the ad valorem roll submitted to the Florida State Department 1 '-' ...., of Revenue. 2. REIMBURSEMENT. The County agrees to reimburse the Property Appraiser in accordance with Section 197.3632 (2), Florida Statutes (2000) for the necessary administrative costs incurred in connection with providing the information described above. Administrative costs shall include but not be limited to those costs associated with personnel, forms, supplies, data processing, computer equipment, postage, and programming. Payment by the County to the Property Appraiser for these costs shall be made within thirty (30) days from the County's receipt of a properly submitted invoice from the Property Appraiser. 3. NOTICE. All notices or other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given if delivered in person or sent by certified mail return receipt requested and addressed as follows: If to the County: With a copy to: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 If to the Property Appraiser: With a copy to: St. Lucie Property Appraiser 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Property Appraiser Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 4. FILING. This Agreement and any subsequent amendments hereto shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court for St. Lucie COL!nty pursuant to Section 163.01 (11), Florida Statutes (2000). 2 '-" ...., 5. AMENDMENT: GOVERNING LAW. This Interlocal Agreement may only be amended by written document, properly authorized, executed, and delivered by both parties and filed with the Clerk of Court as required herein. This Agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit and all interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. IN WITNESS WHERE9F the parties hereto have duly executed this agreement the day and year noted below. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY COUNTY PROPERTY WITNESSES: Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: ~ 4). tUVD~ PROPERTY APPRAISER ATTORNEY G\WP\MSBU\KingOrang2\IA-P A.WPD 3 '-' ~ INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT SKYLARK2 MUNICIPAL SERVICES UNIT THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of ,20_, by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA (the "County") and DOROTHY JO CONRAD, as St. Lucie County Tax Collector (the "Tax Collector"). WHEREAS, the County intends to levy non-ad valorem special assessments against certain properties within the Skylark2 Municipal Services Benefit Unit (the "Skylark2 MSBU") in unincorporated St. Lucie County for the purpose of funding a project to provide potable water to the properties within the Skylark2 MSBU; and WHEREAS, the County intends to use the unifonn method for the levy, collection and enforcement of the non-ad valorem assessments pursuant to Chapter 197, Florida Statutes (2000); and WHEREAS, the County and the Tax Collector have agreed to enter into a written agreement whereby the County will reimburse the Tax Collector for her necessary administrative costs incurred under Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes (2000) in providing this infonnation related to the Skylark 2 MSBU. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenant, conditions and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Sections 197.3632 and 163.01, Florida Statutes (2000). This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of the parties. There are no promises, tenns, conditions, or obligations other than those contained herein, and this Agreement shall supersede all previous telecommunications, representations, or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties hereto. 2. The above representations are true and correct and incorporated herein. 3. The parties agree that commencing with the 2001 tax year, for a period of twenty (20) years the County shall: a. Provide written notice to the Tax Collector, which notice shall include a certified copy of the Resolution creating the assessment. b. Provide the Tax Collector with copies of all other resolutions relating to the Skylark2 MSBU, including but not limited to any resolution authorizing a change in the amount ofthe special assessment levied against any parcel of property within the Skylark2 MSBU. c. The County shall, in writing, notifY the tax collector of the representative (s) authorized to submit a correction on DR Fonn 409A. The County shall also notifY the tax collector in writing, ofthe official authorized to submit the factors. '-'" ..., d. Provide the tax collector thirty (30) days prior to presentation of certified rolls, with all proposed details regarding yearly billing, prepays, payoffs during tenn, payoffs after first billing (i.e; amortization) and other costs that may be added after prepays. The parties mutually agree to negotiate a fonnat that is acceptable to both parties. The tax collector reserves the right to reject the proposed fonnat ofthe data if it is not compatible with the current collection system and she has not been involved in the development of the fonnat. e. Certify a non-ad valorem assessment roll on compatible electronic medium to the tax collector on or before September 15 of the first year. The assessment roll shall contain the posting of the non-ad valorem for each parcel and contain the following infonnation for all real property located within the boundaries of Skylark2 MSBU: (1) the St. Lucie County Property Appraiser's parcel number; (2) the property description: and, (3) any other infonnation as may be mutually agreed to. Such roll certified to the tax collector shall be a separate assessment roll showing the amount ofthe special assessment applied to each parcel with the Skylark2 MSBU, including any parcels for which no special assessments were levied. The certified special assessment roll shall show the total of all special assessments for the Skylark2 MSBU. If any changes to the MSBU roll need to be made, it shall be the responsibility of the County to file a corrected roll or a correction of the amount of any assessment. f. All assessments shall become liens by operation of law as specified in Section 197.122 F.S. (2000). No liens shall be recorded outside Section 197.122 F.S. 4. The parties agree that commencing with the 2001 tax year, for a period of twenty (20) years, the tax collector will collect and disburse the Skylark2 assessments. Specifically the tax collector shall: a. Produce and pay for combined notice of ad valorem taxes and non-ad valorem assessments pursuant to the requirements of 197.3635 F.S. b. Collect all special assessments complying with the provisions ofthis agreement, and remit the funds to the County on a monthly basis, less the deductions allowed in paragraph 5 of this agreement. c. Deposit all collections of special assessments in the same account used for collection of ad valorem taxes; however, the tax collector shall provide a statement to the County showing the amount of special assessments collected. 2 '-" "w( 5. The County agrees to reimburse the Tax Collector in accordance with Sections 197.3632 (2), and 192.091 Florida Statutes (2000) for necessary administrative costs, if any, incurred in connection with the Municipal Services Benefit Unit. Administrative costs shall include but not be limited to those costs associated with personnel, forms, supplies, data processing, computer equipment, postage, and programming. The parties acknowledge and agree that a good faith estimate of the cost of collection, based on prior experience with like projects, exceeds two percent (2%) o£the total collection. However, in order to keep project costs as low as possible, the tax collector agrees to accept two percent (2%) of the collection as her reimbursement. 6. If, due to unusual or extenuating circumstances, the tax collector's necessary administration costs of performing the services required by this agreement exceed the usual and expected compensation provided for in paragraph 5 above, the County agrees to pay any additional sums required to fully reimburse the tax collector for her necessary administrative costs as documented by the tax collector. 7. The parties acknowledge that the tax collector is entering this agreement without any determination that the County is legally authorized or qualified to collect its non-ad valorem assessments pursuant to Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes. It is understood that it is her ministerial duty and she has no authority to refuse that duty; question compliance with Chapter 197 Florida Statute; determine the legality of the assessment or determine the constitutionality of any lien resulting from nonpayment of the assessment. In recognition of all of the above, the County shall, to the extent permitted by law, indemnify and save harmless and defend the Tax Collector, its agents, servants, and employees from and against any and all claims, liability, losses, or causes of action which may arise from any misconduct, improper action, negligent act or omission ofthe County, its servants, or employees in the performance of services under this Agreement. 8. This agreement may be terminated by either party, without cause, upon one hundred eighty (180) days written notice prior to November 1 of each year. Any termination ofthis agreement shall not affect the tax collector's responsibilities for tax years prior to the date of termination. 9. Any alteration, variation, modification, extension, renewal, or waiver ofthe provisions of this agreement shall be valid only when reduced to writing, duly authorized and signed by all parties. Any amendment will be entered prior to January 1 of the tax year in which such amendment is to become effective. This agreement and any subsequent amendments shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court for St. Lucie County pursuant to Section 163.01 (11), Florida Statutes (2000). 10. This agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit and all interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. 11. All notices or other communications hereunder shall be in writing and shall be deemed duly given if delivered in person or sent by certified mail return receipt requested and addressed as follows: 3 '-' ....., If to the County: With a copy to: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 If to the Tax Collector: With a copy to: St. Lucie County Tax Collector 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Tax Collector Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 THE NEXT PAGE IS THE SIGNATURE PAGE 4 ~ "wi IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have duly executed this agreement the day and year noted below. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: ST. LUCIE COUNTY TAX COLLECTOR ~~, ,~ft;()(¡\ ~Y'l'-flA&-,-p ?~~1ifdd6 Date: \ ~. c~. 00. APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: ~~.~~ TAXCO~ÆCTO TTORNEY 5 , '-" ..." INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT SKYLARK2 MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 20 _, by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA (the "County") and DOUGLAS S. PUTNAM, as St. Lucie County Property Appraiser (the "Property Appraiser"). WHEREAS, the County intends to levy non-ad valorem special assessments against certain properties within the Skylark2 Municipal Services Benefit Unit (the "Skylark2 MSBU") in unincorporated St. Lucie County for the purpose of funding a project to provide potable water service to properties within the Skylark2 MSBU; and WHEREAS, the County intends to use the uniform method for the levy, collection and enforcement of the non-ad valorem assessments pursuant to Chapter 197, Florida Statutes (2000); and WHEREAS, the County and the Property Appraiser have agreed to enter into a written agreement whereby the Property Appraiser will provide the County with certain information and the County will reimburse the Property Appraiser for his necessary administrative costs incurred under Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes (2000) in providing this information related to the Skylark2 MSBU. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants, conditions and promises contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. GENERAL. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Section 197.3632 and 163.01, Florida Statutes (2000). This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of the parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained herein, and this Agreement shall supersede all previous telecommunications, representations, or . agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties hereto. PROPERTY APPRAISER. Annually prior to June 1, the Property Appraiser shall provide the County with the information described in Section 197.3632 (3) (b), Florida Statutes (2000), for the Skylark2 MSBU. This information shall be provided by list or compatible electronic medium and shall include the legal description of the properties within the boundaries of the Skylark2 MSBU and the names and addresses of the owners of such properties. This information shall reference the property identification number and otherwise conform in format to that contained on the ad valorem roll submitted to the Florida State Department of Revenue. 1 " '-' ...." 2. REIMBURSEMENT. The County agrees to reimburse the Property Appraiser in accordance with Section 197.3632 (2), Florida Statutes (2000) for the necessary administrative costs incurred in connection with providing the information described above. Administrative costs shall include but not be limited to those costs associated with personnel, forms, supplies, data processing, computer equipment, postage, and programming. Payment by the County to the Property Appraiser for these costs shall be made within thirty (30) days from the County's receipt of a properly submitted invoice from the Property Appraiser. 3. NOTICE. , All notices or other communications hereunder shall be· in writing and shall be deemed duly given if delivered in person or sent by certified mail return receipt requested and addressed as follows: If to the County: With a copy to: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue, Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 If to the Property Appraiser: With a copy to: St. Lucie Property Appraiser 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Property Appraiser Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 4. FILING. This Agreement and any subsequent amendments hereto shall be filed with the Clerk of the Court for St. Lucie County pursuant to Section 163.01 .(11), Florida Statutes (2000). 2 '- '-" ....., 5. AMENDMENT: GOVERNING LAW. This Interlocal Agreement may only be amended by written document, properly authorized, executed, and delivered by both parties and filed with the Clerk of Court as required herein. This Agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit and all interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto have duly executed this agreement the day and year noted below. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: ST. LUCIE COUNTY PROPERTY APPRAISER BY: .{~ ¥ptf~-.- DOUGLAS S. P NAM Date: III ijorJ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: ~ tV. úJC/ð~ PROPERTY APPRAISER ATTORNEY G\WP\MSBU\skylark2\IA-P A. WPD 3 .......---- ..r-'" "'-'''' '-" AGENDA REQUEST ..." ITEM NO. C-2d DATE: December 19, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] SUBMITTED BY: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT-ROAD & BRIDGE DIV p~~ P. M. Bowers, Manager Road & Bridge Division TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Authorization for the Chair to sign three (3) contract amendments for existing Sod Contracts. BACKGROUND: The Road & Bridge Division currently has three (3) vendors under contract for sod installation at various locations throughout the County. Each of these three contracts is for $9,999.00. During Fiscal year 1999-2000, the Road & Bridge Division installed approximately $70,000.00 worth of sod at various locations throughout the County. At this time the Road & Bridge Division is requesting to amend each of the contracts to provide each vendor with a total amount of $25,000.00 for sod installation. FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN: lOl-4~08-534000-400-0ther._Contractural Services. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chair to sign the contract amendments as prepared by the County Attorney with Jose A. Gonzales d.b.a T&J Sod Transport & Installation, Nature's Keeper, Inc, and Tri-Brother's Tree & Landscaping, Inc. to increase the contract amount from $9,999.00 to $25,000.00 for each sod installation contract. fx] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED as M. Anderson nty Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: ¡)/ [X]County Attorney [X]Originating Dept. Public Works VJ [X]Purchasing [X]Road & Bridge ~ d3 [X]Mgt. & :::;:;;Ö'0ñu~ [ ]Co. Eng [ ]Finance (check for copy only, if applicable) III c ~ 'WI CDo-(f- oe3 CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT, made this l >+ day of _r~ o~"\..bQ.( 2000, between ST. LUCIE COUNTy, a political subdivision of the state of Florida, hereinafter called the "COUNTY", and NATURE'S KEEPER, or his, its or their successors, executors, administrators, and assigns hereinafter called the "CONTRACTOR". WITNESSETH: 1. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF WORK That Contractor agrees with County, for the consideration herein mentioned, at his, its or their own proper cost and expense to do all the Work and furnish all the materials, equipment, supplies, and labor necessary to carry out this Contract in the manner and to the full extent as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the satisfaction of the duly authorized representatives of St. Lucie County, who shall have at all times full opportunity to inspect the materials to be furnished and the Work to be done under this Contract. It is agreed that the work to be done under this Contract is to provide and install Bahia and Floratan sod as requested by the County Project Manager on an interim basis to allow the County to put the work out to competitive bid. 2. PROJECT MANAGER The Project Manager for the County is Ray Murankus (561) 462- 2511. The Project Manager for the Contractor is Roberta West at (561) 467-1230. 3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE The Contractor shall begin work as requested by the County Project Manager. Commencement of the work by the Contractor shall be deemed a waiver of this notice. The work shall be conducted in such a manner and with sufficient labor, materials, tools, and equipment necessary to complete the work within the time limit set forth in the Contract. Should the organization of the Contractor, or its management, or the manner of carrying on the work be -1- , ..., ..., manifestly incompetent, or inadequate to do the work specified within the stated time, then the County shall have the right to take charge of the work and finish it and provide the labor, materials and equipment necessary to complete the work as planned within the required time and to charge the cost of all such work against the Contractor and his, or its Surety shall be held responsible therefore. The Contractor fully understands and agrees that the County shall not pay for any obligation or expenditure made by the Contractor prior to the effective date of this Contract, unless the County authorizes such payment in writing. 4 . CONTRACT PAYMENT The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Contract at the rate of $0.18 per square foot of Bahia sod and $0.26 per square foot of Floratan sod based on invoices provided to and approved by the County in an amount not to exceed $9,999.99 unless approved by the Board of County Commissioners in writing. Payment shall be made within 30 days of the County's receipt and approval of the Contractor's invoice. 5 . AUDIT The Contractor agrees that the County or any of its duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of three years after expenditure of funds under this Contract, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Contractor involving transactions related to this Contract. The Contractor agrees that payment(s) made under this Contract shall be subject to reduction for amounts charged thereto which are found on the basis of audit examination not to constitute allowable costs under this Contract. The Contractor shall refund by check payable to the County the amount of such reduction of payments. All required records shall be maintained until an audit is completed and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, or three years after completion of the project and issuance of the final certificate, whichever is sooner. 6 . GUARANTEE The Contractor guarantees to repair, replace or otherwise make good to the satisfaction of the County any defects in the sod. -2- , , '-' ....., 7. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY The Contractor is an independent contractor and is not an employee or agent of the County. Nothing in this Contract shall be interpreted to establish any relationship other than that of an independent contractor, between the County and the Contractor, its employees, agents, subcontractors, or assigns, during or after the performance of this Contract. The Contractor shall take the whole responsibility of the work and shall bear all losses resulting to him, or it, on account of the amount or character of the work, or because of the nature of the ground in or on which the work is done is different from what was assumed or expected, or because of bad weather, or because of errors or omissions in his or its bid on the Contract price, or except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents because of any other causes whatsoever,. 8 . INDEMNIFICATION The Contractor covenants and agrees at all times to pay on behalf of and to save, hold, and keep harmless the County, its Officials, Employees, Agents, and Volunteers and indemnify the County, its Officials, Employees, Agents, and Volunteers against any and all claims, demands, penalties, judgements, court costs, attorney's fees, and liability of every kind and nature whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected or arising out of the performance of this Contract. The Contractor hereby acknowledges that the payments made under this Contract include specific consideration for the indemnification provided herein. 9. INSPECTION The work will be inspected by the Project Manager for the County and will be rejected if it is not in conformity with the Contract provisions. Rejected work will be immediately corrected by the Contractor. 10. INSURANCE Commercial General Liabilitv: -3- · " ~ "" The Contractor shall maintain and, prior to commencement of this contract, provide the County with evidence of commercial general liability insurance to include: 1) premises/operations, products/ completed operations, (including XCU hazards) and personal and advertising injury for limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence; 2) fire damage for limits of not less than $100,000 per occurrence; 3) medical payments for limits not less than $5,000 per person and 4) a general, per contract/project, aggregate limit of not less than $2,000,000. The policy shall also provide the County will be given a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation or non-renewal and include County as an additional insured. Business Automobile Liability: The Contractor shall maintain and, prior to commencement of this contract, provide the County with evidence of business automobile liability insurance to include: 1), coverage for any automobile for limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit (bodily injury & property damage) per accident and 2) Personal Injury Protection (Florida no-fault) with full statutory limits. The policy shall also provide the County will be given a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation or non-renewal and include County as an additional insured. Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability: The Contractor shall maintain and, prior to commence of this contract, provide the County with evidence of workers' compensation insurance providing Florida statutory (F.S. 440) limits to cover all employees and include Employers Liability coverage with limits of not less than $500,000 for accidents or disease. The policy shall also provide the County will be given a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation or non-renewal. 11. DEFAULT: TERMINATION Either party may terminate the Contract without cause at any time upon thirty (30) calendar days prior written notice to the other party. In the event of termination, the County shall compensate the Contractor for all authorized work performed through the termination date. -4- , (' '-' """ 12. ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS In the event of any dispute concerning the terms and conditions of this Contract or in the event of any action by any party to this Contract to judicially interpret or enforce this Contract or any provision hereof, or in any dispute arising in any manner from this Contract, subj ect to the provisions of Section 768.28, Florida Statutes and in no way altering the extent of the County's liability under 768.28, Florida Statutes, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs, fees and expenses, including but not limited to, witness fees, expert fees, consultant fees, attorney, paralegal and legal assistant fees, costs and expenses and other professional fees, costs and expenses, whether suit be brought or not, and whether any settlement shall be entered in any declaratory action, at trial or on appeal. 13. NOTICES All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or permitted under this Contract shall be in writing and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier service, telecommunicated, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid) return receipt requested, addressed to: As To County: With A Copy To: St. Lucie County Administrator Administration Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney Administration Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 As To Contractor: Nature's Keeper 3795 Sneed Road Ft. Pierce, FL 34945 or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this Section. Each such notice shall -5- " , '-' ..." be deemed delivered (a) on the date delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. 14. DELAY DAMAGES It is mutually agreed between the parties hereto that time is of the essence in the performance of this Contract. In the event the construction of the Work is not completed within the time herein specified the County will suffer damages, the amount of which is difficult if not impossible to ascertain. It is agreed, therefore, that from the compensation otherwise to be paid to the Contractor, the County may retain the sum of $ 25.00 per calendar day for each day thereafter, Sundays and holidays included, that the Work remains uncompleted. This sum shall represent the damages which the County will have sustained per calendar day from the inconvenience and expense caused to the County by the delay in the completion of the Work. This sum is not a penalty, being the liquidated damages the County will have sustained in event of such default by the Contractor. The County also reserves the right to recover actual damages for other harm which results from the delay. The Contractor shall be liable for liquidated damages even if the Contract is terminated by the County for cause or if the Contractor abandons the Work. The liability of the Contractor and its surety or sureties for liquidated or actual damages is joint and several. 15. DISPUTE RESOLUTION Any disputes relating to interpretation of the terms of this Contact or a question of fact or arising under this Contract shall be resolved through good faith efforts upon the part of the Contractor and the County or its Project Manager. At all times, the Contractor shall carryon the work and maintain its progress schedule in accordance with the requirements of the Contract and the determination of the County or its representatives, pending resolution of the dispute. Any dispute which is not resolved by mutual agreement shall be decided by the County Administrator who shall reduce the decision to writing. The decision of the County shall be final and conclusive unless determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be fraudulent, capricious, arbitrary, so grossly erroneous as to necessarily imply bad faith, or not be supported by substantial evidence. -6- ¡¡. '-" 'WI 16. MEDIATION Prior to initiating any litigation concerning this Contract, the parties agree to submit the disputed issue or issues to a mediator for non-binding mediation. The parties shall agree on a mediator chosen from a list of certified mediators available from the Clerk of Court for St. Lucie County. The fee of the mediator shall be shared equally by the parties. To the extent allowed by law, the mediation process shall be confidential and the results of the mediation or any testimony or argument introduced at the mediation shall not be admissible as evidence in any subsequent proceeding concerning the disputed issue. 1 7 . INTERPRETATION: VENUE This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreements between the parties with respect thereto. This Contract may only be amended by written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by both parties hereto. This Contract shall be interpreted as a whole unit and section headings are for convenience only. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Contract, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit for St. Lucie County, Florida, for claims under state law and the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. (THE NEXT PAGE IS THE SIGNATURE PAGE) -7- '. . ~ ..,¡ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Contractor has signed his, its, or their name, or names the date aforesaid. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WITNESSES: ~ ~ð 1Y)'r:! /YLcrn O),~() tR ~~. BY: Í ~J]t ¿ II Print N e: .fJ It y zJof Z,v( fui¿ W~J Ail. Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: ~ ~o Attorney WITNESSES: NATURE'S KEEPER ~, ~ \\ ~ d );y-~6L~ BY: ~_..I.Go' ¿¡JuÁ A ORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Print Name :~ð~"e.n::; ¿Uésr Ti tIe: ---;::}¿ t!P-S I j) €-¡.J J C:\JWL\AGREE\NATURES KEEPER-3 OO.WPD -8- '-' ...." COO-/d--/~C¡ ~ . CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT, made this ¿I-If> day of ~~ 2000, between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the state of Florida, hereinafter called the "COUNTY", and TRI-BROTHERS TREES & LANDSCAPING, or his, its or their successors, executors, administrators, and assigns hereinafter called the "CONTRACTOR". WITNESSETH: 1. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF WORK That Contractor agrees with County, for the consideration herein mentioned, at his, its or their own proper cost and expense to do all the Work and furnish all the materials, equipment, supplies, and labor necessary to carry out this Contract in the manner and to the full extent as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the satisfaction of the duly authorized representatives of St. Lucie County, who shall have at all times full opportunity to inspect the materials to be furnished and the Work to be done under this Contract. It is agreed that the work to be done under this Contract is to provide and install Bahia and Floratan sod as requested by the County Project Manager on an interim basis to allow the County to put the work out to competitive bid. 2. PROJECT MANAGER The Project Manager for the County is Ray Murankus (561) 462- 2511. The Project Manager for the Contractor is Russell Fasnacht at (561) 465-9000. 3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE The Contractor shall begin work as requested by the County Project Manager. Commencement of the work by the Contractor shall be deemed a waiver of this notice. The work shall be conducted in such a manner and with sufficient labor, materials, tools, and equipment necessary to complete the work within the time limit set forth in the Contract. Should the organization of the Contractor, or its management, or the manner of carrying on the work be -1- ": .. '- ..., ; '-' ...,¡ manifestly incompetent, or inadequate to do the work specified within the stated time, then the County shall have the right to take charge of the work and finish it and provide the labor, materials and equipment necessary to complete the work as planned within the required time and to charge the cost of all such work against the Contractor and his, or its Surety shall be held responsible therefore. The Contractor fully understands and agrees that the County shall not pay for any obligation or expenditure made by the Contractor prior to the effective date of this Contract, unless the County authorizes such payment in writing. 4 . CONTRACT PAYMENT The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Contract at the rate of $0.19 per square foot of Bahia sod and $0.31 per square foot of Floratan sod based on invoices provided to and approved by the County in an amount not to exceed $9,999.99 unless approved by the Board of County Commissioners in writing. Payment shall be made within 30 days of the County's receipt and approval of the Contractor's invoice. 5 . AUDIT The Contractor agrees that the County or any of its duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of three years after expenditure of funds under this Contract, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Contractor involving transactions related to this Contract. The Contractor agrees that payment(s) made under this Contract shall be subject to reduction for amounts charged thereto which are found on the basis of audit examination not to constitute allowable costs under this Contract. The Contractor shall refund by check payable to the County the amount of such reduction of payments. All required records shall be maintained until an audit is completed and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, or three years after completion of the project and issuance of the final certificate, whichever is sooner. 6 . GUARANTEE The Contractor guarantees to repair, replace or otherwise make good to the satisfaction of the County any defects in the sod. -2- '-' 'ftt¡f 7. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY The Contractor is an independent contractor and is not an employee or agent of the County. Nothing in this Contract shall be interpreted to establish any relationship other than that of an independent contractor, between the County and the Contractor, its employees, agents, subcontractors, or assigns, during or after the performance of this Contract. The Contractor shall take the whole responsibility of the work and shall bear all losses resulting to him, or it, on account of the amount or character of the work, or because of the nature of the ground in or on which the work is done is different from what was assumed or expected, or because of bad weather, or because of errors or omissions in his or its bid on the Contract price, or except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents because of any other causes whatsoever. 8. INDEMNIFICATION The Contractor covenants and agrees at all times to pay on behalf of and to save, hold, and keep harmless the County, its Officials, Employees, Agents, and Volunteers and indemnify the County, its Officials, Employees, Agents, and Volunteers against any and all claims, demands, penalties, judgements, court costs, attorney's fees, and liability of every kind and nature whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected or arising out of the performance of this Contract. The Contractor hereby acknowledges that the payments made under this Contract include specific consideration for the indemnification provided herein. 9. INSPECTION The work will be inspected by the Project Manager for the County and will be rejected if it is not in conformity with the Contract provisions. Rejected work will be immediately corrected by the Contractor. 10. INSURANCE Commercial General Liabilitv: The Contractor shall maintain and, prior to commencement of this contract, provide the County with evidence of commercial -3- -;:; '-' ..."", general liability insurance to include: 1) premises/operations, products/completed operations, (including XCU hazards) and personal and advertising injury for limits of not less than $1,000,000 per occurrence; 2) fire damage for limits of not less than $100,000 per occurrence; 3) medical payments for limits not less than $5,000 per person and 4) a general, per contract/project, aggregate limit of not less than $2,000,000. The policy shall also provide the County will be given a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation or non-renewal and include County as an additional insured. Business Automobile Liability: The Contractor shall maintain and, prior to commencement of this contract, provide the County with evidence of business automobile liability insurance to include: 1) coverage for any automobile for limits of not less than $1,000,000 combined single limit (bodily injury & property damage) per accident and 2) Personal Injury Protection (Florida no-fault) with full statutory limits. The policy shall also provide the County will be given a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation or non-renewal and include County as an additional insured. Workers' ComDensation and EmDloyers Liability: The Contractor shall maintain and, prior to commence of this contract, provide the County with evidence of workers' compensation insurance providing Florida statutory (F.S. 440) limits to cover all employees and include Employers Liability coverage with limits of not less than $500,000 for accidents or disease. The policy shall also provide the County will be given a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation or non-renewal. 11. DEFAULT: TERMINATION Either party may terminate the Contract without cause at any time upon thirty (30) calendar days prior written notice to the other party. In the event of termination, the County shall compensate the Contractor for all authorized work performed through the termination date. -4- ~ 'W 12. ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS In the event of any dispute concerning the terms and conditions of this Contract or in the event of any action by any party to this Contract to judicially interpret or enforce this Contract or any provision hereof, or in any dispute arising in any manner from this Contract, subj ect to the provisions of Section 768.28, Florida Statutes and in no way altering the extent of the County's liability under 768.28, Florida Statutes, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs, fees and expenses, including but not limited to, witness fees, expert fees, consultant fees, attorney, paralegal and legal assistant fees, costs and expenses and other professional fees, costs and expenses, whether suit be brought or not, and whether any settlement shall be entered in any declaratory action, at trial or on appeal. 13. NOTICES All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or permitted under this Contract shall be in writing and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier service, telecommunicated, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid) return receipt requested, addressed to: As To County: with A Copy To: St. Lucie County Administrator Administration Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney Administration Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 As To Contractor: Tri-Brothers Trees & Landscaping 2400 Dade Road Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this Section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered (a) on the date delivered if by personal -5- '-' ....., delivery, (b) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. 14. DISPUTE RESOLUTION Any disputes relating to interpretation of the terms of this Contact or a question of fact or arising under this Contract shall be resol ved through good faith efforts upon the part of the Contractor and the County or its Project Manager. At all times, the Contractor shall carry on the work and maintain its progress schedule in accordance with the requirements of the Contract and the determination of the County or its representatives, pending resolution of the dispute. Any dispute which is not resolved by mutual agreement shall be decided by the County Administrator who shall reduce the decision to writing. The decision of the County shall be final and conclusive unless determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be fraudulent, capricious, arbitrary, so grossly erroneous as to necessarily imply bad faith, or not be supported by substantial evidence. 15. MEDIATION Prior to initiating any litigation concerning this Contract, the parties agree to submit the disputed issue or issues to a mediator for non-binding mediation. The parties shall agree on a mediator chosen from a list of certified mediators available from the Clerk of Court for St. Lucie County. The fee of the mediator shall be shared equally by the parties. To the extent allowed by law, the mediation process shall be confidential and the results of the mediation or any testimony or argument introduced at the mediation shall not be admissible as evidence in any subsequent proceeding concerning the disputed issue. 16. INTERPRETATION: VENUE This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreements between the parties with respect thereto. This Contract may only be amended by written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by both -6- -.., "'" parties hereto. This Contract shall be interpreted as a whole unit and section headings are for convenience only. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Contract, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit for St. Lucie County, Florida, for claims under state law and the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Contractor has signed his, its, or their name, or names the date aforesaid. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WITNESSES: ~~- ~~ BY: Title: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND COR CTNESS: BY: WITNESSES: TRI-BbRS TR S ,Ii LANDSCAPING BY: L~/f- 'AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE ~J&-//é.;~¿-a ~I.-(, Æ"--í {/ . /- /$;£# Print Name: ¿vi ¡::;"~n~,¡vl --- Title: iý'~-t ;:#~V'¡;~ / C:\JWL\AGREE\TRI BROTHERS OO.WPD -7- '-' "'wI COO-Ic:¿- /SS- CONTRACT THIS CONTRACT, made this 4-M day of &~ 2000, between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the state of Florida, hereinafter called the "County", and JOSE A. GONZALES D/B/A T&J SOD TRANSPORT AND INSTALLATION, or his, its or their successors, executors, administrators, and assigns hereinafter called the "Contractor". WITNESSETH: 1. PURPOSE/DESCRIPTION OF WORK/WORK AUTHORIZATIONS That Contractor agrees with County, for the consideration herein mentioned, at his, its or their own proper cost and expense to do all the Work and furnish all the materials, equipment, supplies, and labor necessary to carry out this Contract in the manner and to the full extent as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the satisfaction of the duly authorized representatives of St. Lucie County, who shall have at all times full opportunity to inspect the materials to be furnished and the Work to be done under this Contract. It is agreed that the work to be done under this Contract is to deliver and install Bahia sod and Floritam sod at various locations in St. Lucie County as directed by the County Road and Bridge Division on an as needed basis as further described in the Contractor's proposal to the County attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A". Any conflict between the terms and conditions of Exhibit "A" and the terms and conditions of this Contract, shall be interpreted in favor of this Contract. Specific work assignments will be initiated as directed by the County Project Manager and shall be set forth in individual Work Authorizations. All Work Authorizations shall be executed by the Contractor and on behalf of the County in accordance with the St. Lucie County Purchasing Policy. The Work Authorizations shall describe the specific scope of the work to be performed, the amount of compensation and the schedule for completion of the work. -1- ~ ...., 2. PROJECT MANAGER The Project Manager for the County is Ray Murankis(561) 462- 2511. The Project Manager for the Contractor is Tony Gonzales at (863) 467-9677. 3. TERM: TIME OF PERFORMANCE Unless terminated as provided for herein, the initial term of this Contract shall be one year from the first date above. Thereafter, the parties reserve the right to extend the term for two additional periods of one year each on the same terms and conditions, as may be amended. All work shall be completed within the time frames set forth in individual work authorizations. The wórk shall be conducted in such a manner and with sufficient labor, materials, tools, and equipment necessary to complete the work within the time limit set forth in the Contract. Should the organization of the Contractor, or its management, or the manner of carrying on the work be manifestly incompetent, or inadequate to do the work specified within the stated time, then the County shall have the right to take charge of the work and finish it and provide the labor, materials and equipment necessary to complete the work as planned within the required time and to charge the cost of all such work against the Contractor and his, or its Surety shall be held responsible therefore. The Contractor fully understands and agrees that the County shall not pay for any obligation or expenditure made by the Contractor prior to the effective date of this Contract, unless the County authorizes such payment in writing. 4 . CONTRACT PAYMENT The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of authorized work under this Contract at the rate of $0.18 per installed square foot of Bahia sod and $.26 per installed square foot of Floratam sod. The total amount paid to the Contractor during the initial term of this contract shall not exceed nine thousand nine hundred ninety-nine and 99/100 dollars ($9,999.99). Payment shall be made no later than forty-five (45) days after each work authorization is completed and accepted by the County Project Manager. The parties agree that the amount of compensation may be -2- '-' ....., adjusted at any time upon mutual written agreement of the parties. 5 . AUDIT The Contractor agrees that the County or any of its duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of three years after expenditure of funds under this Contract, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Contractor involving transactions related to this Contract. The Contractor agrees that payment(s) made under this Contract shall be subject to reduction for amounts charged thereto which are found on the basis of audit examination not to constitute allowable costs under this Contract. The Contractor shall refund by check payable to the County the amount of such reduction of payments. All required records shall be maintained until an audit is completed-and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, or three years after completion of the project and issuance of the final certificate, whichever is sooner. 6 . GUARANTEE The Contractor guarantees to repair, replace or otherwise make good to the satisfaction of the County any defects in workmanship or material appearing in the work within 6 months after the day the work is accepted by the County Project Manager. Contractor further guarantees the successful performance of the work for the service intended. Neither inspection nor payment, including final payment by the County shall relieve the Contractor from his or its obligations to do and complete the work in accordance with this contract. If the County deems it inexpedient to require the Contractor to correct deficient or defective materials or labor, an equitable deduction from the contract price shall be made therefore or in the alternative, the County may sue for damages. This guarantee is in addition to any other warranty available to the County for the Work including but not limited to manufacturers warranties. 7. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY The Contractor is an independent contractor and is not an employee or agent of the County. Nothing in this Contract shall be interpreted to establish any relationship other than that of an -3 - '- ...., independent contractor, between the County and the Contractor, its employees, agents, subcontractors, or assigns, during or after the performance of this Contract. The Contractor shall take the whole responsibility of the work and shall bear all losses resulting to him, or it, on account of the amount or character of the work, or because of the nature of the ground in or on which the work is done is different from what was assumed or expected, or because of bad weather, or because of errors or omissions in his or its bid on the Contract price, or except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents because of any other causes whatsoever. 8 . INDEMNIFICATION The Contractor covenants and agrees at all times to pay on behalf of and to save, hold, and keep harmless the County, its Officials, Employees, Agents, and Volunteers and indemnify the County, its Officials, Employees, Agents, and Volunteers against any and all claims, demands, penalties, judgements, court costs, attorney's fees, and liability of every kind and nature whatsoever arising out of or in any way connected or arising out of the performance of this Contract. The Contractor hereby acknowledges that the payments made under this Contract include specific consideration for the indemnification provided herein. 9. INSPECTION The project will be inspected by the Project Manager for the County and will be rejected if it is not in conformity with the Contract provisions. Rejected work will be immediately corrected by the Contractor. When the work is substantially completed, the Contractor shall notify the County in writing that the work shall be ready for final inspection on a definite date, at least three (3) calendar days thereafter, which shall be stated in such notice. 10. INSURANCE Commercial General Liability: The Contractor shall maintain and, prior to commencement of this contract, provide the County with evidence of commercial general liability insurance to include: 1) premises/operations, products/completed operations, (including XCU hazards) and personal and advertising injury for limits of not less than $1,000,000 per -4- '-' ..,., occurrence; 2) fire damage for limits of not less than $100,000 per occurrence; 3) medical payments for limits not less than $5,000 per person and 4) a general, per contract/project, aggregate limit of not less than $1,000,000. The policy shall also provide the County will be given a thirty (30) day written notice of cancellation or non-renewal and include County as an additional insured. Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability: The Contractor shall maintain and, prior to commence of this contract, provide the County with evidence of workers' compensation insurance providing Florida statutory (F.S. 440) limits to cover all employees and include Employers Liability coverage with limits of not less than $500,000 for disease and not less than $100,000 for accident. The policy shall also provide the County will be given a thirty (30) day written notice-of cancellation or non- renewal. 11. DEFAULT: TERMINATION A. FOR CAUSE If either party fails to fulfill it's obligations under this Agreement in a timely and proper manner, the other party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice of any deficiency and by allowing the party in default ten (10) calendar days to correct the deficiency. If the defaulting party fails to correct the deficiency within this time, this Agreement shall terminate at the end of the ten (10) calendar day period. With regard to the vendor, the following shall be considered a default under this Agreement: (1) Failure to make complete deliveries within the promised time. (2) Unauthorized substitution or delivery of goods deemed by the County to be inferior. (3) Inability of the Vendor to fulfill the terms and conditions of this Agreement. -5- ~ "-tI B. WITHOUT CAUSE Either party may terminate this Contract without cause at any time upon fifteen (15) calendar days prior written notice to the other party. In the event of termination, the County shall compensate the Contractor for all authorized work performed through the termination date. Unless agreed to otherwise by the County, if the Contract is terminated by the Contractor, the Contractor agrees to provide sod at the then agreed price through the effective date of the termination which will be 15 days from the date the notice of termination is received by the County. 12. ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS In the event of any dispute concerning the terms and conditions of this Contract or in the event of any action by any party to this Contract to judicially interpret or enforce this Contract or any provision hereof, or in any dispute arising in any manner from this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs, fees and expenses, including but not limited to, witness fees, expert fees, consultant fees, attorney, paralegal and legal assistant fees, costs and expenses and other professional fees, costs and expenses, whether suit be brought or not, and whether any settlement shall be entered in any declaratory action, at trial or on appeal. 13. NOTICES All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or permitted under this Contract shall be in writing and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier service, telecommunicated, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid) return receipt requested, addressed to: As To County: With A Copy To: St. Lucie County Administrator Administration Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney Administration Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 -6- '-" ....., As To Contractor: Jose A. Gonzales T & J Sod Transport and Installation 1435 S.W. 67~ Drive Okeechobee, FL 34974 or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this Section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered (a) on the date delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. 14. DISPUTE RESOLUTION Any disputes relating to interpretation of the terms of this Contact or a question of fact or arising under this Contract shall be resolved through good faith efforts upon the part of the Contractor and the County or its Project Manager. At all times, the Contractor shall carryon the work and maintain its progress schedule in accordance with the requirements of the Contract and the determination of the County or its representatives, pending resolution of the dispute. Any dispute which is not resolved by mutual agreement shall be decided by the County Administrator who shall reduce the decision to writing. The decision of the County shall be final and conclusive unless determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to be fraudulent, capricious, arbitrary, so grossly erroneous as to necessarily imply bad faith, or not be supported by substantial evidence. 15 . MEDIATION Prior to initiating any litigation concerning this Contract, the part ies agree to submit the disputed issue or issues to a mediator for non-binding mediation. The parties shall agree on a mediator chosen from a list of certified mediators available from the Clerk of Court for St. Lucie County. The fee of the mediator shall be shared equally by the parties. To the extent allowed by law, the mediation process shall be confidential and the results of the mediation or any testimony or argument introduced at the mediation shall not be admissible as evidence in any subsequent proceeding concerning the disputed issue. -7- ...., ..., , . 16. INTERPRETATION: VENUE This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreements between the parties with respect thereto. This Contract may only be amended by written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by both parties hereto. This Contract shall be interpreted as a whole unit and section headings are for convenience only. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Contract, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit for St. Lucie County, Florida, for claims under state law and the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Contractor has signed his, its, or their name, or names the date aforesaid. WITNESSES: ST. OUNTY, FLORIDA . ~J /1/ 1 J :.' /i tI ~d~ ~~ BY: BY: WITNESSES: JOSE A. GONZALES, TRANSPORT I SOD \\. j;;: '< :-¿:! Y}/n:< Y?Lð ,#'Øf¿k' Print Name::)OSó" .4, 6vA)'ZA/~~ g:atty\agreemnt\contract\T&JSod.wpd -8- AGENCY r-'AtJ!::. I:H C P INSURANCE AGENCY, INC 796 W 84 ST HIALEAH, FL 33014 305-556-0250 FX ml!:uf'IIæ JOSE A GONZALEZ DBA T & J SOD T~SPORT & 1435 S.W. 67 DR OKEECHOBEE, FL 34974 INSURANCE co. R SPECIALTY INS. CO. INSURANCE THIS IS TO INDICATIO. CERTIF¡CI\. TE MAY IIIE ISSueD _ '---'I ExCLUSIONS "NO CONDITIONS OF SUCH 901.1C11I5. CO I LTI< ' TYPE O. ~1VwIICi: BOVS FOR THE POLICY peiliOD 't WITH "iSPECT TO WHICH THIS HEREIN IS SU8JECT TO AU. THe TERMS. LIMITS A G!HMAL UAIIII,ITY X COMM~IAI.. oem;IUiL LlAIIIUTV CU\1M5I MAl)!! 00 OC-CUflt OWN!::f'I'S 110 CONTRAC'rOI'l'S I'I'<OT MS050677 8 105/ ! OS/22/01 QI!NellAL Aa(;¡I!EGA 1'1£ I"fIQDUcn - ¡;;QMI'IOP ""00 PE!l5DNA:. &. AO\i INJURy EACH OCCUIII'IENCe: .2 000 000 ,INCLUDED 'ü,OOO,OOO Ü ,000,000 100,000 . 5 000 '*1,000 000 !'lfIt! OAMAGE IMy omo Ir~¡ I ME!> ex? ¡At\'( one """son¡ ~OMOICU UAIIII\JTY ! : AN" AU1'O ¡----¡ h71 ALL ow""'!> Þ.l.JT05 \->f..; SCHI!CVt.fO AV'I'OS U I-JIRED AUTOS U IIKJN-QWNe:¡;¡ ...UTOS CM!IINED SINGLE _'MIT III_oOILY IN~I.i"Y I iP-e:f;:KIf3örJ ÐlCE" UAIIIUTY U MIIR;!L\..... P'OfltM OTHER THAN UM3f'1l!1.1.A FOAM wOlllf.elltS COMPlliHllATlotI AI\Iö ¡ blP\OVEM' 1..1;1.11114'" B THE i'ROAArI!""CI't' ¡NCt. WC 0 00 602 I'AR'fNEI\S/eX¡;CUTIV¡¡ OFFIC!él'tIli "!'IE; X ¡¡XCL OTImI: I!!. EACH AC::CIOINT 02/23/ 00 I 02 /2 3/ 0 1 I EI.OI!.lEA$1ô . ·ÔL¡t::Y¡,IMIT ¡ EL OISE...Sf . EA. il\AI't.CVII& CA077849 10/Og/00 10/06/01 ÕRAIJ£ UAIII.JTV ANY ALiTO I ¡ n \ I G&CPlIr.ION OF OI'!i'!IUiTlÒlll5ilOCATIONIIIJV!!HIC\.£SiIPf,ClAL 11&11;1$ VEHICLE 91 CHEV ASTRO ID # INCREASED LIMITS EFFECTIVE ILITY CE TIFlCATE CO~~ERcrAL GENERAL Sk~ LUCIE COUNTY DEPARTMENT 2300 VIRGINIA AVE FT PIERCE, FL 34982 1>.. TT: MY M1JRANKUS '~"''''''''d~; 61- =~:' . Of TUB .....OVIi oaaçp.¡ug I'OUCLEJI &£ CA>ice.u.:a:> &£/'(¡N¡ 'THiIIi PA"!'I! 'n!IiIU!OI', WE \S$UWG COiW".IUIY W1IJ. ENOI!AVOII TO IIo&AIL NO"nCli TO 'TtIf, CiiITlFlCAU MOl!)E" ~!) 'TO 'TH1i LIFT. &\IeH ...once JlK/I.IJ. ~ IIfO ~ T'IOf'i QIIt LJAiJIJ'fY eo..."AHY. ITS AGl;NTII OR IlEl"llESI!HT A 11VI!II, '-' ...." AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C - 2E DATE: December19,2000 SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS DEPT REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] PRESENTED BY: (~:s~Î._W~ County Engineer TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Work Authorization No. 9 to the continuing engineering agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to provide requested revisions to the construction documents for Orange Avenue over Header Canal Bridge Replacement. BACKGROUND: The fiscal year 1999 budget provided for the replacement of Orange Avenue Bridge over Header Canal. Work Authorization NO.1 provided a feasibility study and cost analysis for the replacement of the bridge using an alternative structure. Work Authorization No.6 provided designs plans and specification forthe chosen alternative structure. The alternative structure, an arched culvert pipe, supported the existing two lane road. Work Authorization No.9 is intended to increase the width of the structure to support future four-Ianing of Orange Avenue. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available in Fund No. 316001-41133-563005-431016 Transportation Capital I Local Option Bridge Maintenance. PREVIOUS ACTION: . January 20, 1998 - SOCC approved Work Authorization NO.1 for a feasibility study and cost analysis of the proposed bridge replacement in the amount of $17,558.00. . March 23, 1999 - BOCC approved Work Authorization No.6 for preparation of design plans and bid documents in the amount of $24,900.00. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Work Authorization No.9 with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for engineering services to provide requested revisions in the amount of $10,800.00, and authorize the Chairman to sign. g sAnderson ~~~ator J3 [xl Mgt. & Budget ' [xl Purchasing [x] Project. Man. 'hi [x] Budget & Rev. Coor. ßA-Y\ (Check for copy only, if applicable) CE: COMMISSION ACTION: k] APPROVED [] OTHER [] DENIED qì 1/4 [xl County Attorney "'~-L- [x] O.riginating DePt~. ts "Î ~. [x] Finance md . ;. '-' ....,; fõ)Œœvw~~ lml~ I ; 21m læJ ENGINEER;~',JG -------~. ~=~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. December 8, 2000 . Suite 400 601 21 st Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 Don West, P.E. St. Lucie County Engineering Division 2300 Virginia Avenue 2nd Floor Annex, Room 229 Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5652 Re: HeaderCanill Dear Mr. West: As requested we have developed a scope and fee proposal for engineering services associated with the extension of the proposed Header Canal to a 100 feet culvert. The scope of services, fee and schedule for this work order are provided in the attached Exhibit "A" through Exhibit "C". We appreciate this opportunity to work with St. Lucie County and look forward to continuing to be a part of your program. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 561/562-7981. Sincerely, KIMLEY -HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INC. J~~Ul~~.E~~ Associate cc: Craig Hauschild John Atz K:\PROPOSAL\KHA \stIuci 181208.doc . TEL 561 562 7981 FAX 561 562 9689 .... ..."" WORK AUTHORIZATION NO.9 Engineering ServiceS Related to Bridge Design C-98-01-248 for Orange Avenue over Header Canal Bridge Replacement Pursuant to that çertain Agreement Between County and Engineer for Engineering Services (the "Agreement") between St. Lucie County (the "County") and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (The "Engineer") dated January 6. 1998. the Engineer agreés to provide the Scope of Services described in Exhibit "A" for the Compensation described in Exhibit "B". All services provided under this Work Authorization shalt be completed according to the schedule described in Exhibit ·C". IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Engineer has affixed his, its, or their names. or name, on the dates below. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: ENGINEER BY: Print Name: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Date: '-' ....." EXIDBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES Task 1 - Analysis and Permitting We will evaluate the proposed plans for the Header Canal bridge replacement to identify areas of impact for the extension of the proposed 74 feet Conspan culvert to a 100 feet Conspan culvert. We will conduct a hydraulic analysis and evaluation for the extension. In addition, we will evaluate the by-pass system for adequacy and capacity with the longer installation of pipe. After the analysis has been completed we will prepare and submit the analysis and permit applications to South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) and North St. Lucie Water Control District (NSLWCD) for modification to existing permits. The application will include the analysis, evaluation against agency criteria and conceptual layout of the proposed culvert. We will attend a meeting with St. Lucie County and NSLWCD to review proposed revisions and attend the NSL WCD Board meeting. Task 2 - Plans Preparation We will make the necessary plan revisions to accommodate the extension to include the following: · plan sheets modifications to each of the phasing plan sheets, · maintenance of traffic plan modifications, · revision of the typical section and revision of effected details. · coordination with Cons pan for the revision of the Conspan detail sheets. Upon completion of the plan sheets revisions, we will conduct a quantity take off and make the revisions to the plan quantity sheet. We will also make the necessary revisions to Section 300 of the bid documents. The plans will be submitted to the County for review and comment. '-' ....." Exhibit "B" FEE We will accomplish the service outlined in Task 1 and 2 for the lump sum fee of $10,800, inclusive of expenses. Task Fee Total Fee $7,300 $3,500 $10,800 Task 1 Analysis and Permitting Task 2 Plans Preparation '-' "w1I Exhibit "C" SCHEDULE The schedule for the work as described in Task 1 and Task 2 will be competed prior to' December 26, 2000, with the exclusion of any board meeting or subsequent revisions that are out of our control. " - ~ ""'" AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C - 2F DATE: December 19, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS DEPT PRESENTED BY: .Þ~f.' Wo.\...-.- (Don West, P. . County Engineer SUBJECT: Request approval of Work Authorization No. 10 to the continuing engineering agreement with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. to provide plans and specifications for the repair of 53rd Street Bridge over Canal C-25. BACKGROUND: The Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) has requested prompt corrective action be taken to armor the bridge abutments. Work Authorization No. 7 provides design details to fulfill this request. Work Authorization No. 10 is intended to provided additional plans and specification to repair all the present deficiencies of the existing structure. To reduce the costs associated in the proposed repairs, the engineering department intends to address all the necessary repairs at the same time. FUNDS AVAilABLE: Funds will be made available in Fund No.1 01 003-41133-563005-431 01 Transportation Trust I Local Option I Bridge Maintenance. PREVIOUS ACTION: July 11, 2000 - BOCC approved Work Authorization No.7 for providing design details of a sheet pile repair for the armoring of 53rd Street Bridge over Canal C-25 abutments in the amount of $6,700.00. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Work Authorization No.1 0 for the scope and fee proposal submitted by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for engineering services to provide plans and specifications in the amount of $13,800.00, and authorize the Chairman to sign. [ f APPROVED [] OTHER [] DENIED Do Anderson County Administrator ['J Mg!. & Be'get ~ v'Y1/~ ['I Pecch","g ~ [x] Project. Man. C!AN [x] Budget & Rev. Coor. '\"\ COMMISSION ACTION: ¿n/ ~ [x] County Attorney , ~ . [x] O.riginating ~Pt Pr!l5l fi [x] Finance 0\ (Check for copy only, I ' e) ~=~ ~...., -- ........ - ~. Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. December 8, 2000 Don West, P.E. St. Lucie County Engineering Division 2300 Virginia Avenue 2nd Floor Annex, Room 229 Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5652 Re: 53rd St. Bridge and Roadway Improvements Dear Mr. West: ....,¡ f¡ij ~ © ~ n w ~ ~' Uü~ I~~~ C:'~ ...'r....,",·'" Ef", r·.. ,- -- J"., ".... 't _,) i ~. l_ i-; ; '. I l \..... ---._----.,.--~ As requested we have developed a scope and fee proposal for engineering services for the improvements to the 53rd St Bridge and adjacent roadway. The scope of services, fee and schedule for this work order are provided in the attached Exhibit "A" through Exhibit "C". We appreciate this opportunity to work with St. Lucie County and look forward to continuing to be a part of your program. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at 561/562-7981. Sincerely, KIMLEY-HORN AND ASSOCIATES, INe. ~::.~JL Associate cc: Craig Hauschild John Atz . TEL 561 562 7981 FAX 561 562 9689 lIDOGBER1\VOLlIPROJECI\MISClPROPOSALIKHAlstluci171208,doc . Suite 400 601 21 st Street Vero Beach, Florida 32960 ,-". ~ WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 10 Engineering Services Related to Bridge Design C-9a..01-248 for 53rd Street Bridge over C-25 Pursuant to that certain Agreement Between County and Engineer for Engineering Services (the "Agreement") between St. Lucie County (the "County") and Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (The "Engineer") dated January 6. 1996. the Engineer agrees to provide the Scope of Services described in Exhibit tl.A- for the Compensation described in Exhibit -B- . All services provided under this Work Authorization shall be completed according to the schedule described in Exhibit ·C-. IN WITNESS WHEREOF. the County has hereunto subscribed and the Engineer has affixed his, its. or their n&mes. or name. on the dates below. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: ENGINEER BY: Print Name: Kimley-Horn and Associates. Inc. Date: '-' """ EXlDBIT "A" SCOPE OF SERVICES Task 1 - Survey We will meet with County officials on site to investigate the issues and deficiencies associated with the structure. We will then obtain survey infonnation sufficient that a base map can be prepared which will cover the project area between Angle Road and approximately 200 feet north of the bridge. Measurements of the structure will be gathered to include scupper locations, bent layout, curb details and overall dimensions. Topographic infonnation will be obtained such that the existing elevations within the project limits can be detennined to include the adjacent swales drives and roadway. The existing bench mark on the bridge will be utilized. Horizontal points will be established such that control can be provided during construction. Task 2 - Plan Preparation We will prepare construction plans and details which will detail the replacement of the guardrail on the bridge as well as the railing off the deck of the structure. The attachments will be positioned such that the existing scuppers will not be impacted. The cleaning and repair of the joints will be addressed. The roadway between Angle Road and the bridge will be detailed for reconstruction such that the stonnwater runoff flows into the adjacent land area verses the existing path of onto the bridge deck. The existing path used as a "hot right" will be detailed to be graded and sodded over so as to prevent this movement off of the existing pavement. The drive and dirt roadway on the north side of the bridge will be address. This may entail paving the turnouts up to the right of way line and attempting to direct the runoff into the swales rather than onto the bridge deck. '-" ..."" Task 3 - Quantities and Specifications This will determine the individual quantities and prepare a tabulation of bid items along with specifications needed for the proposed construction. They will be prepared to be inserted into Section 300 of the bid documents. In addition any special provisions identified for the project will be provided to the County for inclusion. One hard copy will be provided to the County. The County will be responsible for reproduction for bid sets. Task 4 - Construction Assistance We will attend the Pre-Bid Meeting and assist in addressing technical questions, which will need to be addressed by addendum. Upon selection of a contractor, we will attend a pre-construction meeting to answer contractor questions and assist in the project start-up. We will also review any required shop drawings or material specifications, which may be required for construction. It is our understanding that the County will conduct the bid evaluations and make the selection recommendation of contractor(s). For each structure modification project, we will provide specific limited construction observation. We shall have no responsibility for any contractor's means, methods, techniques, e.quipment choice and usage, sequence, schedule, safety programs or safety practices, nor shall we have any authority or responsibility to stop or direct the work of any contractor. It is our understanding that the County will undertake the day to day construction observation, contract with a material testing lab and prepare the contractor's pay request. Our visits will be for the purpose of endeavoring to provide the County a greater degree of confidence that the completed work of its contractors will generally conform to the construction documents. We propose for each structure that we allow one visit for each structure repair for each of the following events: · Installation of sheet piles · Contractor's procedure of slope protection · Final rebar layout inspection for approach slab . Initial guard rail installation · Final inspection of guard railA. Roadway reconstruction ~ 'WI In addition, we will respond to contractor "Request for Information" (RFI) issues. We understand that this may require a site visit and written response. We will accompany the County on a final walk through of each project site, to identify items to be addressed by Contractor. We neither guarantee the performance of contractors, nor assume responsibility for any contractor's failure to perform its work in accordance with the contract documents. Upon acceptable completion of construction, we will provide a written statement as to the work being completed as per the proposed plans. "-' ...", Exhibit "B" FEE We will accomplish the service outlined in Tasks 1 through 4 for the lump sum fee of $13,800 inclusive of expenses. Task Fee Task 1 Survey Task 2 Plans Preparation Task 3 Quantities and Specifications Task 4 Construction Assistance $1,600 $5,400 $2,000 $4,800 Total Fee $13,800 '-" ......, Exhibit "C" SCHEDULE The schedule for the work as described in Task 1 and Task 3 is of an urgent nature and will be completed as quickly as possible. Task 4 will be conducted concurrent with construction. " . ' ... '-'GENDA REQUEST ~M NO. &:zil DATE: December 19, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT-ROAD & BRIDGE DIV ~ Scott Herring, As stant Mgr. Road & Bridge Division SUBJECT: Approval to purchase a Raised Pavement Marker (RPM) Applicator, EQ#01-223, for use in the Traffic Operations Section. BACKGROUND: The Traffic Section of Road & Bridge Division is requesting permission to purchase a Raised Pavement Markers (RPM's) Applicator in the amount of $3,795.00. This piece of equipment will allow for the more efficient installation of RPM's and increase the safety for the crews installing these. There are sufficient funds available in the Traffic Operations Equipment account to purchase this item with the savings that were realized on the purchase of other Traffic Operations Section Equipment. Staff has received three (3) quotes on this piece of equipment and the low quote was submitted by S.T.E. Inc., in the amount of #3,795.00. FUNDS AVAILABLE: 101-4109-564000-400 - Machinery & Equipment PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval to purchase the Raised Pavement Marker Applicator from S.T.E. Inc. and approval of equipment request EQ#01-223 from within this line account without any increase in the overall 4109 budget previously approved. COMMISSION ACTION: k] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED u as M. Anderson nty Administrator [X]Co",1y AlIDmey ~- [X]Originating Dept. Public Works ~W cn.~SI~ [X]Mgt. & Budge [ ]Co. Eng [X]Purchasing c/3 ~ [X]Road & Bridge [ ]Finance (check for copy only, if applicable) ,I " . ,- -- " - ",' c. '-' ...." ~ -::..~'-~. N C '~I~'~-~' ' ...~" ¡ .1 L L 1· ",~""""': ·l'i!t_. _ --..' 1/';'" I 9~~, ' ...,,-:. 'J' ~. - - -- l}j'>r~If~ \ MAN~~~T~ER OF QUALITY HANDLlNERS Be DIES ...·.-r/ .~ S.T.E. I .----- ---- --. 1355 SARATOGA ST. UNIT C, DELAND, FLORIDA, 32724 1 (888) 343-7496 (904) 943-8899 WEB SITE: httD://www.handliner.com Handliner Price List PRICES SUBJECT TO CHANGE WITHOUT NOTICE BASIC APPLICATORS HBM-1 M MANUALLY CONTROLLED THERMOPLASTIC APPLJCA TOR COMPLETE WITH HAND BRAKE AND THERMOMETER INSTALLED. $ 6,485.00 HBM-1 T THERMOSTATICALLY CONTROLLED THERMOPLASTIC APPLJCA TOR COMPLETE WITH HAND BRAKE AND THERMOMETER INSTALLED $ 7,195.00 HBT-2M MANUALLY CONTROLLED BITUMEN APPLJCATOR COMPLETE WITH THERMOMETER, HAND BRAKE AND HAND TORCH INSTALLED. $ 3,595.00 HBT-2T THERMOSTATICALLY CONTROLLED BITUMEN APPLJCA TOR COMPLETE WITH HAND BRAKE, THERMOMETER AND HAND TORCH INSTALLED $ 3,795.00 ACCESSORIES HBM-001 ADJUSTABLE WIDTH GLASS BEAD DISPENSER $ 995.00 HBM-1 MM TOP MOUNTED MINI MELTER $ 1,495.00 NEC-042K HAND TORCH KIT (Includes Torch, Mounting Brackets & Fitting). $ 85.00 DIES STE 1-05 5" DIE (SPECIFY M-ILLAGE WHEN ORDERING) " $ 335.00 * STE 1-04 4" DIE $ 400.00 * STE 1-06 6" DIE $ 360.00 * STE 1-08 8" DIE $ 390.00 STE 1-09 9" DIE $ 445.00 STE 1-10 10" DIE $ 475.00 * STE 1-12 12" DIE $ 425.00 * STE 1S (Set Contains One Each 4" 6" 8" & 12" Die) (YOU SAVE $ 120.00) $ 1,390.00 DO NT FORGET OUR DIE REBUILDING PROGRAM JUST $ 225.00 EACH m D c "tI 3: m z -I ;;0 m D ;I!: 111 o c ..... I I\.) I\.) w » () () o c Z -I Z c 3: [XI m ~ ..... c ..... I ~ ..... c ~ I 01 ~ C C C I ~ C C .-. .. .~ " ~ s: :;! :;! ~ CD ëij' :E ëa "0 CD Q) èj)" ëa ëa @ ëa CI) 0 Q) c:: ..... :::-N- ~ CD o ..Q CD èj)' c:: C. ;:) "6" g ~ :3 _ _ CD 16 Q.. ~ "0 CI) ~ c:: Q) :::: a Q3 Q) ~ ~ 5= ~ t)- ::E CD è6" Õ' Q, :j' ... o s: s: s: CD CD ~ :;t ~ JgQjëa c:: S1 "6' 0 CD :3 ~ ~ § CD èj)" :- Q3 ~ ~ 5- ;:) CI) CI) ¡¡¡ .g¡åf c:: ã- "6" ;:) :3 0 CD ..... ~ ::0 ~ ~ o CI)~ o Q) c:: ;:) ~ c. Õ s" "0 0 c:: ëa a Q) ~ CI) Q) CD CI) s: CD CD s: CI) iij' Q) ;::¡, èD' CD~ :3 Õ' ~ ... ;::¡, ::-i :::r Q3 s: ~ CD ~ CI) CD Q) :3 :So "0 cB Õ" CI) ~ CD !II c.. C ~ ;¡ õ ~ õ z m D c :¡j 3: m z ::t ~ èi5 g] ~ rii š:: ~ -I ~ ::0 ~ ::0 ~ ~ Þ 1:1 ~ ~ d ::0 c <: Cñ õ z ::0 ~ Q ¡jIo to ::0 6 (j) 111 ~ C/) ~ C/) C m ~ ;;0 -I 3: m z ::t 1:1 ~ r- ?5 ~ ::0 @ ;;0 m () o 3: 3: m z C m C en -t m~ Dc 50 -0- 3:m mO zO -te :::oZ m-t D-< em mO en> -t:::o ,,0 00 :::0" "0 Cño oe >z ï-t -<-< mo >0 :::03: N3: 0- oen °en ~- 00 oZ ~m :::0 en ~ ....., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. ~ Ie¡ DATE: December)Z"'2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: ~CAß1he{ Donald G. Cole, Property Acquisition Manager SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): County Attorney SUBJECT: Petition to Abandon- Permission to Advertise Public Hearing Dixieland SID-an unrecorded plat- Section 27-35-40 Unopened 60' right-of-way I Tax 10# 2427-801-0106-000/9 BACKGROUND: NSS Acquisition Corporation has petitioned to abandon an unopened 60' right-of-way that was donated to St. Lucie County on January 11, 1973, recorded in OR Book 210, Page 169 of the Public Records. NSS Acquisition Corp. owns and operates the Bev Smith Toyota dealership on U.S. Highway #1 in Fort Pierce. This right-of-way lies directly east of property owned by the petitioner. The unopened right-of-way has never been maintained by the County nor are there any future plans to open and pave the right-of-way, it is currently heavily vegetated. The petitioner would like to use the abandoned right-of-way as an employee parking lot. If the right-of-way is abandoned, the parcel will be placed back on the tax roll. The petitioner advertised their intent to abandon in The Tribune on October 1st and 8th, 2000. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize staff to advertise a Public Hearing to be held on January 16,2001, at 9:00 a.m., or as soon thereafter as possible. COMMISSION ACTION: be] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED XX County Attorney: XX Originating Dept.: --~ ,k Review and Approvals Public Works: County Engineer: Purchasing: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) I: Eff. 5/96 \J: t..:...J ~,~ I I, ~; :s --- """j ! I I I I I I ! UJ 1 i f- CD I 1 [/) e +1 ~ ~1 I ::s OJI r I I 1 ¡ I I I I I I / I I 4~ (80/-0//7- I I 000/9) I 1340:!: LL f71~ SOUTHLAND DRIVE ~ í 7i I ~lf 281.43 75 IpO 190 125 _¡60 160:!: I 110: /105 105 5u, I 'I 4 I I IO!Ö)O 4 11/ /8 I ~,L____~ 5 j¡ 6 7 g 8 9 j¡--.{ d "----~15 I 7 - _~ ~II (801-0001- 3- I - I ~ /I c:; 8 3 I! I 9 ! ~ ~ 000/3) -. 75 -{ll- ~ 75 1 0 75 - ~ if¿~ roo"O 75 ~\ i I "'.501 I I 2 / I I 12 i 9 ~ 20 / / 10 I J 1- - - - - 18 I 17 16 ~ 15 14 ~ 125: <::5 ~ _ /4 I 13 / !2 rr- _ _ g¡ I I I I I I 0 13 ~ ~ 0 I I /I ¡ I III J , 405.341 I 225 I 75 75 ctI 125 !' 60 ctI 100 76.5+ 80/ 112.50 I 162.5d I ~ ~ DIXIELAND ~IU.IlIIIIIIIU..II_II' DRIVE ,,3 g ¡ I 250.32 150j 75 I 75 75 125 60... 176,8::!:... /120 90¡ 92 50 I 2 +1 1+ +1 8 +1 o( 6 o( 10 ~ lJJjO/-00/9~ ~ 3 I 4 0) 5 6 T ~'- _ ~ '"" 176.9::!: _ ¡" +19 ¡- +t I '; I 000/2J ~ I ß ~~. ~ 5 I I" ~ " II ~ I I j - 9 - è)r- - - - I f- :I-H¡'~..lJ2-H-a - 1501 75 75 75 125 a ~ 4 U I 12 \-- +<-=-t<r7.9,,'t' "+1 I o 10J ... +/'ï'r- - - - -:'!' ' 9.1 ... lC) J ~ r 90) 3 92 ¡ ~ :;%? 177+ 13 'I ~ I f--- 2 C;S I 2 0 18 17 ~ 16 L _/4_~ I J U')\ è51- - - -~ï ¡ / 0::1 ~ I I 15 I 0 178.2::!: i ho 185 / I ~ I 0 0 48.3.20 0 I ;Õ (432-0001-000/f) ~ 60 <D 125 <D I N1 8.24 Ac -;- - r 1-/'-+1 10 1(80/- 01 r- - - - 1 I ... f-- +1 ' 0//6-012./9 wIn I 5 T 8 I 9 ::: Ii -;; ¡ 1/ 51 ~I ~ - - - ~ ¡ I 125 i/f °1 CDI ~' I 4 I ® I 1 12 , I ~I °1 ~ 1- -;- 78ÇJ/-Oq84yOOTaJiJ-g i I ~ I 695 05 r- - - - 1 I 125 - I - I 2 I I ~ I I I I 8 o( ¡ 2 I 18 I 17 /16 0 /4 I I ~ '1- - -r801-0028iOOQ/8)I 6 I 7 r- - ci ~ - - - -, I ~- - -2 'I J - 1 I 3 I 6~7).~ I I 9 ~ ¡ I ¡ 5441.9+ I :;5 - ! I 502.43 0 (80/- , (80/- 0 I (80/- I I <D 0//6-0/0/51 01/6-000/21101 01/6-0///2) I ¡--4--JI-¡-T 1185/0 o100::!:4/ /200.::!:¡ I 1a; I ~~ - - - 5 I 6) 7 I 8 ~ 9 t- -;- 2 ~ _ _ -j 5 I 6 7 /_ _,g ¡ ~ ! m~~ ~ (80/-0~7-op~î! -+ _~ 1185 - lOa J ! © I I 9 I ;. I 43 I I --- -'--... . ~ ....., Exhibit "B" ~ f-_ (/)' :S~ 121 47 d ~I I I ~I ~I ~I ~I , ..!... .;' I, ¡¥"J Õ t") -q- W ' ~~ -! , (42/-000/-000/7) 26.65 Ac 121 ., /' \ .¡ 0 ¡I z '! :?r..... ';1 ,I >- il ~ tl ~ ..I tl i! ~ \ :J I \ ) ! ~ ' > \ ) 1) ~ o o ,., ;! o (\ , I ... - '" lJìO 2- 1 o ~ '" ô ~ r ~ I ci : ( ~ 1 0 o( 10 ('. ;..r ; ì : -.... -r ~ '1 t I ~ r" ' ( ~ 1 -... - -.r- I! ~ ì to: '-" J ~ ì \JI f6 ~ ¡=- , I \.!; , l-t TY,~ L~ '" "-' "w1I I I ¡ ¡ I I I I i ; ; ; ; i ; ; ;; i i !! ! !! !J ~ 3 I MILES I 112 TWP. 35S.-RNG. 40E. SOUTHEAST QUADRANT ,NORTH£.AST gJJACAANT ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA i . í6œla..~ ~~ ~ ~- :::;.' ::; f~"" l~' ~ ~ o~(U :~~0 OSCI!CJ.A "~4~ð~~I~C;=- ... """' -œOR A\I£.Õ >~ -..eNf Ave.! 1-; ö: ~ ~ td . Wit Zw . u:: % Ir\~ .. GARJEHA A 1t-.AArn'H" """. J ~ '~ ~ ..-..e AvI. I\...-..e Ave ~j ÕÑ OF ~ ~ ~ ~~ .. . L \.:~i= II> FCRT z:.', ~ ~SEI.. YN ..ve. LL.~ ~ "'ERa: ~ "'; ç;:::: ~ WIS'TeU ~ve. 2"" ~ 14~-1/~ :~; 'g- ~\ e. RANCHO OR. .....JLI - ,_ j 40,.4 ACZ ~::: ~'~~f# ..:.cu, ~ ~ ,- OfY OF ~ :: AI' .. AZAIÐ A~. h 411=.!,[1·"" FORT ~ I ^ ~ 15 PAl M A"" -t J2.5AC.':" "'ERa:,\~ - I-,J... \1 .~~.,~ 2 ,-;-~~F := ~ ;, AI~1 ~ '" ..:':' t\ ã IXQRA Ave. J.. a.,¡ ~g: ~Z.J4ACJ~ .... .,..... '\\,~ ~AJÐV£W3 Y;. 95 \ ~. ~:l.7 ~- ~ ""'4.-' ......,.~"..E HCX..L V AV1 ~~ ca. a: ~~ _ ~ ~ . -..t.OS . 4J ,u~ . YMt"" I ~~'"'( 1"'"~.s>H 11oØJo(" .. ..ïiñ._1 ,\ eo.. DR ~~~ ~:'" ;~ \s v<' ~ 0....,.,..· ...... '" \ .~~~ OtARt.¡;. ~ \ ~ .I:JIt* ~ ......" ~\ .... HOWE DR -::s.~ð & SJ.ItRU:,,\ ~ "";"..::,;; .... ..., t.a.. OJ,,, I J' J---':-,. """.".1/....... ~ 32.26 Ac. J.UL ¡\.IAN \ ~ ~;, ..... .\ _ 11 ~\ N o _".. ~ \ "'///////Çj/// "...., 4 ",.. ~----------.---------. --------------------------------.--------.------- :}n~ T;~~~::: ~---i ::t:::. ~ \ ~~ ·"c...."o '~ ~~ 0....... J Cl AULTUAN II!.:..!.LS· \ =:: \~.' ~\~ ~j~! ~.~ ~~.~ J~~ l~~tl'AC' ~ê tj. ~~..~ ~ _ 3 ; ~ -~~"¡'E..r: OHIO! POINT ) ~I-< .. 00!01>lT ~ >- ... ~ ....:~ - ." ~ or OELRAY ~:: 9<W4AH) .. ~.. z ~:-< BUJRS,. 'NC. \ , 4. ft ~ i~; 114-1/... l;:: 1.LD....oIl,iCj y ~ NG ..........,""'" .~ - J6.ñ:Ac. \ '"'~' : 2{/-O·~'~rf~ ~ ~ ::: ~ INV(~~~ ~ l..'--t\\~ ~ .. ~ ~ >.-m-- 'NC.26~· \,. [-~ \. \.\ z~ FRAN0:5 :!T, II T __ ~ ....( 1'\' ..., ...- - ' ,'\i ~J. ~~''t''HLO _ ~,\\ P9IE DR, ~ '=- OIXI:J...IJ'Ð [WI P~I"'l ~-----\:\ ;rr¡¡" == ~,\ FRA-IAAR F'L~ eœ "'Ç",-",. 8(~1 ¡O'1 rp //////////////.z '\ _ _"'~ IHC. ':'::~.~ """".. '" \'O~lfrYptOf'E"C'~ ~ WA~" ::¡ '<'""'''''0 IN(. ð.2 ,FT PIERCE ,\\" " 'z \~-' .; -;:;r.;,-- ð.DJ _',' , //é/~/¡J("À'" '--~: ; .-ÆI!'S MA trr RD. - .. ... ).;' J42-1 n cø1r ~q~ ~ '~ -c STAT(OFrt.ORtOA ?:::~~~: _ ~;:"~V;'~~I:C 1:.gZ i.Jl~. ~jl-~c· '\",\~\:~ ~ ''','.: 0Í~~ID~~~ ~:-':~~~'~L~~=~I;¡ G'~~L'~~:~Nf I \)\ \'~(f.. C~~R'/ ;~\:=-ã\l-1--·····-------·----····--··------·-----·-·----·-· o _ I ~~. .....á! Z~55Ac. ..1!l........~I(,. JOINf,.t~ fU"E JOIN.f "t~HU".' I \ ,~':, PIERCE ;'=:-;'_ \ : f 1.0< Z O//,Ä"i".H/.'//". ~//N/J?J'~~'·,·/"///. ~ ~ ~ .,. ~\_ \ I 11111 '..,.r5~:o.cr ':,,' ~ / \./ '.---..".,:, :,~\~._ ',: '" II I ..ÀJ""DJiO'T" , , \ 1~I-aOOI-aco/' ~~=.. ' ;: .1'....AtŒT ..ve.ciL..'....... u 11!.:..!.L7 ZI2-0QQ.!=.OOO/C "'" "A" ~ . '-- h .. L :x LLLJ L- '" l' g - 41.62AC. SU'¡Ac. ( f~ ~ ~\""'" ~ =~~ .. -n.--::: .. JA.IoE:! Bl.VC. -'....., <.. J po ~ ~ ~,~ -'-¡" _ ....-..., 0 ~ .... = ERSK'NE ~ ,>-_'. ~ ~~ - ~g ð. ~~C:i 1< ~ ~ ç F"l. PROP.. "\\~K-'~\'-'~ \" (?" ~ arr CI \~ ,~ '.~ 1105.~ ,~- ~ :: ::¡ ß _ 'NC. ~.' ~\ ~ I .. rCJII >(J!C( ..?i ~ 'Ii~ --·.ACO H·~, . . ' :z: '41-1/0 ' \ ~% ",-oœs-O'D/~' ~~'~ "'Á ........ ill .=;..¡, ,.. '.\' "- ¡, \ '~ ...""'~ w..(~ en In. 3I.Ó4~C. " \.. 3.5 l ~ _ !S,~.\'" \ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ;ŠÉ IE."" CI(~.~~~ s..:.. UERSKINE rLoRtOÁ~. \ ~~ 'l II' ..,-~--'''~ ª~ ~\~ 1;3. ;¡,....... -[ _ 7.IJ PI.'!A, BU 4 ~I-I/~ / PROP,INC, "~ " I 0 ~z, ;~~" .~ ;;:,...:.:: ..- ;1Ml_I007 ~6"I.("('~ \ fß~.. 0 ,,/.~ -- ~....'I \ I1 .r ..~ ~U"'" ~~I o;~nAT ~ _ \ ?" ~~ ~ \ ~ '- ~I~~ I ~~ ~\ . ~~- :;1:1 ==¡;.~ -L SJoJ.r¡ io~' ~I-J/' "\ \ ~a.. '.ý,~ \ Ir ~'-'õ~/ . \,~ ~~ ~~....tj C:::";q~ ß ... I~ \) ,~JI -11 :~~~, \: ,..~a:ocC/. \\7~ \~ il =Q IT . ~ ,~-rt.o:Ø..... I<L.JOG "I), GATO; ;r- mAC!:IOR. .. "I";',~ ~\:3 - ~ '7 ~~ <:0." :J\~"'" ':~ :~~ LH II ULj 3 ,_ H 1%..1511 I II *-";'",,: 7~1 ,.~' tJQQ!..=.OOO/9~~\\ :(4)~ \)' ; .~~ ';;' ~:~\\~ ~ ". II 1~:~t(:~i¡1 ~~~I:~ ~ ~ ~ ~~"U~ '~ \C;\~\~ ' ~ \::: ~ ~~::-~\~~~ I~~~i'~-EH æ ~I rTITñ~ ~~ -~ ~wEAneea RO """.'.:,0;-',,_,,-: ';;lllllllIllt~';1> ~\ o o SEE PAGf ]5 seo 1:120 1980 2&.40 I FEET I 5280 TWP. :15S.-AN<l. 40i OF ~ ... Ó =:: ~ - - .. I~ .. 23 24 INDIAN ~ ~ ~ 25 I 1= .. '" .. .. .. .. .. RIVER 36 ;~ S!~ ..\u ~! 0... , . ~ I ... " ~ If oi .. .. ..: ~ >- - >- en w ~ J: ~~~' '.::.~ o ~~ - <n -£ , TWP, JIIS.-RNG 40E_ ti) ''"'" 1\()II'II).oo; I"\,...r... SEE PAGE 51 TWP. :1ðS.-RH<l. 40t:. ~Exhibit "K" - iilll) THE TRIBUNE ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA P.O. Box 69, Fort Pierce, FL 34954-0069 -=-ø 1EIIMUm AFFIDA VIT OF PUBLICATION STATE pF R.ORIPA COUNTY OF ST.lUCIE Befœ8 .... undwlS;g.wd ..v-il, IOØ5ONOa, "PP"1IIWd. LJ"'I F"""", Of I<aI/IIIIetI K. LaClair, "'0 on oaU'I says IhIII ".",.. is Ope<Dons ........,.,. 8usì~ Manager ~ The Tribune. . ddr ne~ published · FOR Pioret ir1 S1. Lucio Counrt, Florida; \I1aI the aIIacI1ed copy oIldvol1iMmen! - ¡M I'" ift The Tribut1e ,., tho fallowing isslIM below. Alfoar1t IurIh« 'IIW'I !hili the Aid Tribune ;a ;¡ tMlM lapet putIIiIhMI 1\ Foot p;en:e in JI jd St. Lucie County. F10ride and 1hll/1/1e Mid ~ .... I1ereIolora '-" oonmuøusIy pubIISt18d in IPI 51. L.uc:ie County. AoIida ØlliIy aflll tftt/IIIUIIId in St LUCIe COunty, Flarida. tor a I8I1Od 01 DIM year next pnICIICIing lilt fim pubicaIíofI 01 allKhId copy 01 advet1iMrMrII; af1CI affiIInt tu,.,.,. laY' Ihe1 hMhe ha ",",,-r pMI nor povII1ised .., pIIfSOII. linn or COOIIOQIIion .., *-". ..... cammiuion or ~ tar ... 9U'PO" of ..~ .. ~ftII nt 101' NOIIÇIIIIOn ÍI1 - Mid ~, The TII/Iunt I'tu DIlen .ullld aa ~ Clan mallet II VIe Pl»1 OIrlC» In FoIl PIen:e. $I. 1iØ CownIy. IIaftda and tw .,.." tor a oenoct 01 _ year neJII If'tCtCIinQ IN IItaI øuDlIc:allon ~ I'" II1aCIWd copy 01 -"'lITtiHIMnl. AL.! Name J!AtA PrieR ~ Oft f2-! 1"'7.' HOWELl. DOUGLAS 1 "'1 12000 151.J' HOWI!LL, DOUGLAS 10/0.,2000 U1.U Tot.1 1102.72 Subscribed and sworn to me before this date: '10/09/2000 kt±J.j~~L<-, . ~<jÚ .~ / _~//i-------~ Notary Public CI/ffJ/ mq-~ IU.IN MC.CM'T)f'r ,c.-. tmnooz ._wa; QC 7Sla33 ~_II_I.D ...." NOTICE ~ 'NTENT ' TO AlANDON TO 'WHO"", IT MAY CONCERN, v.... wt. tab notICe Ihar I" __ don.or ...;th ... P'O"J. ........of Sedio.. 177,101, OJ alll.lld.d 316.09 a".. 334. I O. Florida SIoIuta. ... _""-". _d St. L_ c-.tr I.aIId D.wc"""-' C...... s.c.o.. I 1.10.01 .,. SeQ. "fSS ACquó.mo.. COlJl. ""-do ... '"" a pctiticm ~ """' .... St. l_ COIJIIIy Boord of c:~ Cð_",il.ioft.ri t!,...., -=CIIe, Oftd abandon IIIøt , ~... of 0 public "lOCI. ROW ~ doocm.d. and _ QIIcf diKlolI.. """ r"hI of St. L..... COWIfy IIftd !he public in IIftd ... /he IotMU lytfIQ .;/hin ...... por- _ of IOÏd public _. lOW '" St. Lucia CouMy. florillo. "..cr¡O~4 Øl tol_" LEGAl. DeSCRIPTION" 1:11.- _lid S!D . ... ."..ecorded pIo'- SaaIorI 27·35-4 Q para! t:I land 60 ,... ... and _ø ...... 320 ... .-th -' ......... Iyinv W-" ~k I & 81ødt . lor 210-1691 NAME Of f'ETlTIO"'fI: NS5 kquioiti"" C,""" APDIŒSS, 12' 0 NoIthIIItId BJ.d.. LoIra Park. Fl 33403 "vbI111I: 0cI0b0r I & 8. , 2000 1990798 ; ......, AGENDA REQUEST .""-,, ITEM NO. C-3l0 DATE: December 19, 2000 REGULAR [ PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT [XX] SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) :County Attorney PRESENTED BY: Donald G. Cole Property Acquisition Manaqer TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Revocable License Agreement Ranger Construction Industries Inc. Cherokee Street BACKGROUND: The County received a request for permission to utilize a portion of the Cherokee Street right-of-way from Jim Widmann, Vice President of Ranger Construction Industries Inc. This proposed storage site is needed while Ranger Construction works on SR 608, AKA St. Lucie Blvd. which is a FDOT project in St. Lucie County. Mr. Widmann's request, proposed use and sketch for the site are attached for your Consideration. FUNDS AVAIL. ~ PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached Revocable License Agreement, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and instruct Ranger Construction Industries Inc. to record the Agreement in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. [ X ] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED sAnderson y Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: ()J [x] County Attorney: ~ [x] Public Works: ?(.,-{./1 / Coordination/Siqnatures [X] Originating Dept.: ~ [X] Engineering:~ G,\ACQ\WP\DON\license agree RANGER CONST f i '-' .""", This instrument prepared by: Donald G. Cole under the direction of Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 REVOCABLE LICENSE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered this _ day of , 2000, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision ofthe State of Florida, (the "County") and Ranger Construction Industries, Inc., of 4510 Glades Cut-Off Road, P.O. Box 14589, Ft. Pierce FI 34979, ("Ranger"). WHEREAS, Ranger has requested that they be allowed to utilize a 1500' portion ofthe Cherokee Avenue, Right-of-way, west of pavement area as indicated on the attached construction plan hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit" A" for a storage area; and WHICH, the County has agreed to authorize the utilization of the 1500' of Cherokee Avenue, Right-of-way, west of pavement area as indicated on the attached construction plans hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" for a storage area subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this revocable license agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. The County agrees to grant Ranger a limited revocable license for the purpose of utilizing the 1500' of Cherokee Avenue, Right-of-way, west of pavement area as a storage Page 1 of 5 .... ..""" area as indicated on the attached construction plans hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "A" for a storage area. This license shall extend only to the above-referenced Right-of-way and shall not extend to the construction and/or installation of any accessory structures. 2. This license shall be binding on future successors and assignees of Ranger provided that Ranger give adequate notice to the County pursuant to Paragraph six (6) ofthis Agreement. 3. The County shall have the right, at the sole discretion of the County Engineer, to terminate this Agreement with or without cause and require removal ofthe encroachment at the Ranger's sole expense upon fifteen (15) days written notice to the Ranger. The County Engineer may, in lieu of termination, request that Ranger perform certain alterations to the storage area at the Ranger's sole expense. However, ifsuch alteration is not performed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer, the County shall be entitled to exercise its right to terminate this Agreement. 4. The storage area shall be maintained in a safe manner in accordance with all applicable building codes and zoning regulations ofthe County and shall be maintained solely at the expense of Ranger. The location of the storage area on the County right-of-way is subject to the written approval of the County Engineer. 5. The Owners agree to allow County employees access to the location of the storage area for County purposes as determined by the County Engineer. 6. All notices, request and other communications dealing directly or indirectly with this license shall be in writing and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or carrier service, telecommunicated, or mailed by registered or Page 2 of 5 ~ ""wII certified mail (postage prepaid) return receipt requested, addressed to: As to County: With Copies to: County Engineer Engineering Division 2300 Virginia Avenue, 2nd Floor Fort Pierce, FL 34982 County Attorney Administration Building Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue, 3rd Floor Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 St. Lucie County Administrator Administration Building Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue, 3rd Floor Fort Pierce, FL 34982 As to Ranger: Jim Widmann Vice President 4510 Glades Cut-Off Road P.O. Box 14579 Ft. Pierce, FL 34979 or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms ofthis Section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered (a) on the date delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. 7. Ranger shall indemnify and hold the County harmless from and against all claims, liability, demands, damages, expenses, fees, fines penalties, suits, proceedings, actions and costs of actions, including reasonable attorneys fees of any kind or nature arising or in any way connected with the use, occupation, management, or control of the above property by Ranger or their agents, servants, employees, patrons, or invitees, or resulting in injury to persons or property, or loss of life or property of any kind or nature whatsoever, sustained during Ranger's use of the property. Page 3 of 5 ~ """" 8. Ranger shall promptly record this license in the official records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Ranger shall pay any document excise taxes and the cost of recording this license. 9. This License Agreement shall terminate automatically upon the earlier of: (a) completion ofSR 608 DOT Project Number 94006-3502; or, (b) March 1,2001. Upon termination of this Revocable License Agreement, Ranger, at Ranger's expense shall restore the current grade and sod the storage area in a manner that is satisfactory t the County Engineer. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year above first written. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: BY: CHAIRMAN DEPUTY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: WITNESSES: COUNTY ATTORNEY 'JÇt Page 4 of 5 '-' ....., STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before the this !I~ day of DettÎm~.i;\ , . ì' 2000, by ~ \ 1'(\ Lu ì cl vYlCU\ and produced l \(¿r'l~ (type of identification) and who did take an oath. WITNESS my hand and official seal, this r day of D <!.Cß..Nt ~J<,\ , A.D., 2000. C!{JJd·Æ a .J1u~~ Signature of Notary Public ~~ CeroI A BiIhop "*:.* My Commlealon cct3ID4 '\;...~ EJQIires M8v 21. 201M Name of Notary Public Typed, Printed or Stamped -/ J My commission expires: 6/2/ 2 COLI SEAL G:IACQIWP\DONILEGALDOC\RANGER ROW licen.eagree.frm Page 5 of 5 " ~. I EXHIBIT A -..I ;It.' t¡, 0 ~!/ "J ¡ "J 0 g It) ,.., I <0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ... VI 0'1 Q 0 I ... "J' ~ It) I' i ~ ... ;:: ~~¡ ., ~~E !II." " -- is ~"... t;~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~. ~ ~ Q;: ~ ~ Q... A'/ --...-"'."..... ~/~ ~ê è5 Q; I Q; I ~ ai ~ ,.., . ... ~ lì;t :~¡ ~~~ :¡ .,,'" '0 -- is ~"'" t;~~ ~ ~ . (~ , . ~5~ ~ Ii ~ ~ .~ ~ ~J'" ~~ ~I ~~ ~ ~ --- I ! ~ II ~ ¡ I š ~ '-' ... ------- ft - - .--- Is ~ ... ~ ~ '-' ~~~ 'i0 . '"'~~. ~ ~~ . . ~~i , ..... ~ !¡ VI~ v,¡¡)..:S ;:: ,,¡ s ,- 'i( I !~~ II! i? ... .,., ~ ... ... 0:... §o: ~I ~ .~ ~ ~ s~l ~.~ §'" ~ t~~ ~~ ~ '. .~.~ II! Oõi'õi+ ~ ~ ~~' :! '1..1' (ijff;p ~i~ ~ ~ ~' 11\ !~~ ¡..¡, ~ ~.. ,..: 3¡t:t ~d ~~f:t ~ ~t; VI ill.. g ~ IXJ!i0J.p ~ ~Jo()PNQ¡t "J(}Q911r}IJI~(VO^'t ?ur'!:'rI tn),l Il'ff' to !M'~¡dM-'Ct'J!Jnt:N~f»(\¡CM (XOl Wit 10 ---.,----- - "wI1 i;ïJ í2 r¡ 1:'1 IS i OCT - 6 ¿UUL - .-..~_._._..,..",.~~ , .. -. .~.,----."" " ~_.....o 11"""'\ i'\ I ,,'-~- . ;¡ j I .~\~ P hi'....:" . ,...__." -d.dY~··.--- October 6, 2000 Mr. Ray W asny, PE Public Works Director St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 Re: SR 608 (St. Lucie Blvd) Fin Project No.: S.P.No.: County: RCI Job No.: 230346-1-52-01 94006-3502 St. Lucie 320-0211 Dear Mr. W asny, Pursuant to and confinning our meeting of Thursday October 5,2000, relative to the above referenced project. We respectfully request we be allowed to utilize a portion of the County right of way paralleling Cherokee Ave (as per the attached highlighted plan). We will utilize this area as a storage area to be utilized in conjunction with the referenced DOT project. The time duration will be approximately 90 days. Upon completion of the project we will restore this area to original condition. We would appreciation your favorable consideration in this matter. Thank you. Attachments JW/slc 4510 Glades Cut-Off Rd., P.O. Box 14589, FT. Pierce, FL 34979-4589, Phone (561) 464-6460, Fax (561) 466-9559 I,. ,. ..."I 2 7 ,- - '- '-" . .--_._._~._.----~-~ '-.. November 20, 2000 Donald Cole Property Acquisition Manager St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, FL 34950 Re: Utilization of County Right of Way SR 608 (St. Lucie Blvd.) Fin Project No.: 230346-1-52-01 State Job No.: 94006-3502 Contract No.: 20947 RCI No.: 320-0211 County.: St. Lucie Dear Mr. Cole, Pursuant to our correspondence of October 6,2000 and our subsequent meeting of this morning relative to the above referenced matter. As outlined in our prior correspondence we respectfully request we be allowed to utilized the County Right of Way on the East side of Cherokee Street for a distance of approximately 1500 LF running South from Airport Road (SR 608). This area will be utilized as a staging area to store Concrete Pipe & Structures plus to park our equipment. We will need to utilize this for approximately 90 Days and or for the duration of our Consuuction on SR 60õ DO T project # 94006-3502. This '-'.rea '.vii! not be fenced in. We will restore the Right of Way to its original condition by grassing & mulching. I would appreciate your prompt & favorable consideration in this matter. Should you have any additional questions relative to this matter, please feel free to give me a call. S' erely, ) . I Lu~ Widmann 4510 Glades Cut-Off Rd., P.O. Box 14589, FT. Pierce, FL 34979-4589, Phone (561) 464-6460, Fax (561) 466-9559 ,- '.... --- AGENDA REQUEST ..""" ITEM NO. C - Je..,. DATE: December 19, 2000 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Second Extension Agreement with R&R Corporate Systems, Inc. for Janitorial Services BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMEND A TION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Second Extension Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Extension. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: 91as Anderson County Administrator rx] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: ~ Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Central Svcs. Mgr. County Eng.: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 '-" ....., INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY I FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 00-1964 DATE: December 7, 2000 SUBJECT: Second Contract Extension with R&R Corporate Systems I Inc. for Janitorial Services ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: On March 21, 2000, the County entered into a contract with R&R Corporate Systems, Inc. for janitorial services. On November 13, 2000, the parties extended the contract through and including December 31, 2000. The parties have agreed to extend the contract an additional three months to allow the County to rebid a request for bids to provide janitorial services. A copy of the Second Extension Agreement is attached. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Second Extension Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Extension. DSM/caf Attachment ......, ..., SECOND EXTENSION AGREEMENT MARCH 21, 2000 CONTRACT FOR JANITORIAL SERVICES THIS EXTENSION AGREEMENT is made this _ day of 2000, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (the "COUNTY"), and R&R CORPORATE SYSTEMS, INC, or its successors, executors, administrators, and assigns (the "CONTRACTOR"). WHEREAS, on March 21,2000, the parties entered into a Contract (the "Contract") whereby the Contractor agreed provide janitorial services; and WHEREAS, on November 13,2000, the parties entered into an Extension whereby the parties agreed to extend the Contract for an additional three months; and, WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to extend the Contract for an additional three months to allow the County to rebid a request for bids to provide janitorial services and to provide that the Contract may be terminated without cause upon five days prior notice during the three month extension period. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree to extend the term of the Contract through and including March 31, 2001 effective as of January 1, 2001. During this extension period either party may terminate the Contract without cause upon five days prior notice. Upon such termination, the Contractor shall be compensated for all work satisfactorily and responsibly completed through the date -1- '-' ......", of termination. Except as extended or amended herein, all of the remaining terms and conditions of the Janitorial Contract shall remain in full force and effect. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: BY: CHAIRMAN DEPUTY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: R&R CORPORATE SYSTEMS, INC. BY: Print Name: Title: G: \A TTY\AGREEMNT\R&R Extension.wpd -2- '-' ....., INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Roger A. Shinn, Central Services Manager FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 00-1965 DATE: December 8, 2000 SUBJECT: Second Extension Agreement with R&R Corporate Systems, Inc. for Janitorial Services ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attached are four (4) copies of a proposed Second Extension Agreement with R&R Corporate Systems, Inc. If the Agreement is acceptable, please have R&R sign all of the Extension Agreements and return the Agreements to this office. DSM/ caf Attachments - '-" AGENDA REQUEST ......, ITEM NO. C3d DATE: December 19. 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Donald Cole Property Acquisition Manager SUBJECT: Rouse Road MSBU Hendren Right-of-Way Parcel Portion of Tax ID# 1421-604-0002-000/4 Resolution No. 00-288 BACKGROUND: This 20' strip of right-of-way is being donated by the property owner to the County. It is required to complete the right-of-way needs necessary to proceed with construction of paving and drainage improvements to Rouse Road as provided by the MSBU project. FUNDS AVAILABLE: (State type & No. of transaction or N/A): N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: March 10, 1998 - Board accepted the MSBU Petition and granted permission to advertise the Initial Public Hearing to be held on April 7, 1998. April 7, 1998 - Board created Rouse Road MSBU and authorized Engineer to proceed with design and bidding of the project. October 27,1998 - Board approved Interlocal Agreement with St. Lucie Village. November 14, 2000 - Board granted permission to advertise the 2nd Public Hearing.. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board accept the Hendren Deed, authorize the Chairman to execute Resolution No.OO-288 and direct staff to record the documents in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. [x1 APPROVED [1 DENIED [ ] OTHER: gl Anderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: ¡,¡COO"" Atlm'"r ;l Review and Approvals [X]En9ineeri¿ìXíMSBU Coordinator7!tP.- (x)Originating Dept:~ OOther: OOther:_ ý '-' ......; RESOLUTION NO. 00-288 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A DEED FORA 20' STRIP OF RIGHT-OF-WAY (ROUSE ROAD) ON BEHALF OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, that: The foregoing Deed is duly accepted on behalf of St. Lucie County this 19th day of December, 2000. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN ATTEST: CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY Vitolo '-' ...." , I Please return to: CH BX 76 Prepared by: TREASURE COAST ABSTRACT & TITLE INSURANCE CO. 401 SOUTH INDIAN RIVER DRIVE FT. PIERCE, FL 34950 Brenda J. Bidle/File #99-4414 \ \ Parcel ID Number: 142 1- 222 - 0 ~ 0 1- 0 0 0 /5 Grantee #1 TIN: Grantee #2 TIN: Warranty Deed This Indenture, Made this day of September Jeffrey Hendren and Caren Hendren, his wife , 2000 A,D., Between of the County of ' State of New York , grantors, and St. Lucie County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida whose address is: 2300 Virginia Ave., Fort Pierce, FL 34982 of the County of St. Lucie State of Florida , grantee. Witnesseth thaI the GRANTORS, for and in consideration of the sum of _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ TEN DOLLARS ( $10) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DOLLARS, and other good and valuable consideration to GRANTORS in hand paid by GRANTEE, the receipt whereof is hÙeby acknowledged, have granted, bargained and sold to the said GRANTEE and GRANTEE'S heirs, successors and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in the County of st. Lucie State of Florida to wit: see Exhibit nAn attached hereto Subject to restrictions, reservations and easements of record, if any, and taxes subsequent to December 31, 1999. This reference to said restrictions shall not operate to reimpose the same. and the grantors do hereby fully warrant the title to said land, and will defend the same against lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. In Witness Whereof, the grantors have hereunto set their hands and seals the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in our presence: /,"-- / l ~~:1/~:1!L ~ (Seal) ¡.(¡A. P.O. Address: 920 Park Ave., Apt. ISC, New York, NY 10028 )~ Caren en ren P.O. Address: 920 Park Ave., Apt. ISC, New York, NY 10028 (Seal) STATE OF COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this I,,::J "'- day of Jeffrey Hendren and Caren Hendren, his wife New York N~ 'Ù6Œhi'!>"'~ S&p-eembe"r , 2000 by who are personally known to me or who have produced their identification. as . '"'_41' v P"-L1'¡ We'" be v<' Printed ame:/ PQ Notary Publid . 11~ My Commission Expires: ~1 :J-<f' tr] kJ L~. ~ \ 1'. ( ...... i:: ,-t.·~::l"-' ..' to, .; :_.' , .·,.·..ì ~./t/~~.::~;.:):.J::!·:~· ,; . ._~.:~L.::-~:- J...u ¡:': ¡.~,:..", '~'/:;';;. ~"'l.;..ll';'· \~,~:"ï.~;'lì:~:¡~~\I:·l :4 ..>a .-.'..' ., 99-4414 laser Generated by 0 Di.play Sysrem..lnc,. 1998 (941) 76J,SSSS form flWD-1 '"')(I)z OMO ::OM....., ,-.(I)tIJ r<J ::c' 0M ¡:: ~ ON c<J (1)0 \) ...., ;:Q ~ N .....¡ Õ z _ '-t:.. ~·~v _:..ITION 20 SECTION SECTION 21 SECTION - 17 16 - TIllS IS NOT SURVEY 3-29-99 !'Romer NO. 9 9 t 0 DRAWN BY J.WA CHECKED RON HARRIS REYlSIONS NOTE: 20' REQUIRED RIGHT OF WAY SCALE: 1"'-}OO' FIElD COORD F1I..E: SHEET NO. 1 OF 2 N O. q; 8 ~ "< ~ "d ;-JS~ ~o ~ C) 'o ~~ ß ;Q ¡:g 0 0 I"" r; ~ !:1 ()I .... O. 0> l: ° ,þ. 1 ¡:¡ § .0 N ~ I ° ~ ~!ª ~~~ .õ ~ "d 0 ð ?;I ~~ ~:g1~ž ~~tª~ ?;I ë! S'I Z ~I ° C) ?;I N r;ei 1:- I ° ~ '11¡ ~ ~ -< SKETCH OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR ROUSE ROAD MS.B.U. OOARD OF COUN1Y COMMISSIONERS ST. WCIB COUN1Y, FLORIDA FNGINEERINO DIVISION SURVEY SECTION 2XX) VIRDINIA AVE.. FT. PŒR.CE.. FLORlD.4. 'rnLEPHONE (.$60 462-1707 ·f.·..· . "-, .. i '-" ....., DESCRIPTION: TWENTY FOOT (20') RIGHT OF WAY PARCEL I.D. # 604-0002-000/4 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 21, T-34-S, R-40-E, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; THE NORTH 20' FEET OF SECTION 21, T-34-S, R-40-E LYING EAST OF THE OF THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE AMENDED PLAT OF INDRIO PARK AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7 AT PAGE 5 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND WEST OF THE WEST LINE OF RIVERSIDE HARBOR SUBDIVISION AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 10 AT PAGE 5 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID PARCEL CONTAINING 0.37 ACRES MORE OR LESS. CERTIFICATE: I hereby certify that the sketch of legal description represented hereon, dated this / d day of ~~.¡2.- 'I ,1999, is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief, and meets the Minimum Technical Standards set forth by the Florida Board of Surveyors and Mappers in Chapter 61G17-6, Florida Administrative Code, pursuant to Section 472.072 Florida Statutes. NOTE: NOT VALID WITHOUT THE SIGNATURE AND THE ORIGINAL RAISED SEAL OF A FLORIDA LICENSED SURVEYOR AND MAPPER ~é PRO¥ESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER RONALD H. HARRIS STATE OF FLORIDA NO. 4198 SHEET 2 OF 2 YACHT C '~~ '1i1t~ f..\I{;~I''''II¡';' ". '\ >'\ i'AClln<;C Ct," \ ï~:~\. ,) '\ .., \ \, AGENDA REQUEST """" ITEM NO. C-4-A , '-' DATE: December 19, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): PURCHASING CHARLES BICHT SUBJECT: Bid Waiver and Sole Source Purchase for a RAD Communications Products Fiber MUX (800 MHz Radio System) BACKGROUND: See Attached FUNDS AVAIL.: 304-2910-564000-2609 800 MHz Radio System Equipment PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the request for a bid waiver and sole source purchase to RAD Data Communications for a Optimux-XL TI Multiplexer in the amount of $13,800. [21 APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CE: COMMISSION ACTION: u Anderson nty Administrator I~k'/' ;v~ County Attomey:(X) ;, Coordination/Siqnatures Mgt. & Budget:(X) (25i) 1n/YJ&¡ Other: Purchasing Mgr.:(X) Other: oß Originating Dept: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable)_XX_ Eff. 1/97 G:\COMMON\AGENDAS\WAIVERS\800 Mhz MUX.wpd · 'Jack Southard - Stlucie 001128.doc Page 11 '-' ..."",¡ ','-; I PALL COMM 10122 Northwest 3rd Plac r;,; r:;:-,.-. ¡ ") ;-", '"' ~-- -'-'-, i ~ ri-J J: 33 November 28, 2000 Mr. Jack Southard St. Lucie County Emergency Management Ft. Pierce, Florida VIA E- mail Per your request for sole source of the RAD Communications Products Fiber MUX This device is not, in itself, a proprietary item. Other companies make products for similar use. It is, however, the only one that I am aware of that has worked successfully with the Motorola trunked radio system controller. Your prime radio contractor, Dave's Communications, is completely familiar with this product, its installation and maintenance. That firm will be responsible for the device and its future maintenance. I would therefore request that it be considered as a sole source procurement. Mark D. Pallans General Manager -- ~- St. Lucie 001128 Multiple 11 and Ethernet Multiplexer j~' -~;. -- _0,0 : - (.~ .. . · FEATURES · Integrates multiple T1 and Ethernet channels over a single link · Transmission over fiber optic cable, · Supports mLiltimode fiber, single mode fiber and single moae over single fiber (WDM) .'._ f - · Laser diode option · Range up to 60 km (36 miles) · Conforms to ITU G.703, ANSI T1.102, G.742, G.751, G.823, G.956 · Optional second fiber optic link provides automatic bacl<up . Optional redundant power supply .' Management using ASCII terminal, Telnet or SNMP management station . Compact, 1 U high enclosure - ,~- <, - Multiple T1 and Ethernet Multiplexer _ DESCRIPTION · Optimux-XL T1 provides a simple, flexible and cost-effective solution for transporting multiple T1 links and Ethernet at distances up to 60 km (36 miles). · Optimux-XL T1 integrates up to 12 T1 channels and up to four Ethernet LANs over a single fiber optic link. This provides an easily upgradable solution, flexible enough to meet the specific requirements of a broad range of applications. · The unit supports one fixed 1 o BaseT Ethernet port and three additional plug-in channel modules. Available channel modules are: . Quad channel T1 · 1 OBåse T Ethernet. · Modules can be combined in various ways, ranging from four Ethernet ports to a single Ethernet port with up to 12 T1 channels. · APPLICATION 'i!!1! PABX Extension LANA LANB · Various optical interfaces are available: · 850 nm for multimode fiber · 1300 nm for single mode fiber · 1300 and 1550 nm laser for extended range over single mode fiber. · Two Optimux-XL T1 units can be connected over a single fiber (SF) using the WDM technology (The transmit signal is at a different wavelength than the receive signal). · Where required, all critical components can be automatically backed up. This ensures there is no single point of failure. An optional second link provides backup, using automatic switchover upon link failure. An optional second power supply provides power redundancy and fail-safe operation. · Ethernet data is transmitted using a built-in bridging function. The bridge operates at 6 Mbps and supports up to 10,000 addresses. Main Link _ _ _ ~~~~":~ !::i~~ _ _ _ · Optimux-XL T1 transmits each of the T1 channels independently, such that the clock of each T1 channel is independent. · To facilitate system diagnostics, Optimux-XL T1 features LED status indicators, AIS alarm generation, recognition and dry contact closure upon link failure. In addition, the Optimux-XL T1 setup, control and diagnostics can be performed via a supervisory port using an ASCII terminal. Telnet can also perform these operations via the Ethernet ports or a dedicated separate Ethernet management port. · The SNMP management application offers the following options: . Java-based Web management running on Netscape or Microsoft Explorer · RADview-PC running in a Windows environment · RADview-HP for HPOV UNIX platforms. · Optimux-XL T1 is available as a compact 1 U high unit for mounting in a 19" rack. """"- ~ PABX Extension LANC LANB Ethernet Switch Figure 1. Point-to-Point Application Server Multiple T1 and Ethernet Multiplexer II SPECIFICATIONS . Receiver sensitivity (for BER = 10E-9) · -28 d8m at 850 nm · -31 d8m at 1300/1550 nm · -29 d8m for single fiber · -34 d8m for 1300/1550 nm long haul · Maximum Range · 850 nm up to 2.5 km · 1300 nm (LED) up to 25 km · 1300 nm (laser) up to 40 km · 1550 nm (laser) up to 60 km Note: The ranges above were Céllculated according to the following typiCélI attenuation rates: 3.5 dB/km for 650 nm multimode 0.4 dB/km for 1300 nm single mode 0.25 dB/km for 1550 nm single mode CHANNEL MODULES . Number of Modules Up to three · Module Types · 4 x T1, RJ-45 connectors, 100n balanced · Ethernet 802.3, RJ-45 connector, 1 OBaseT port FIBER OPTIC LINK (MAIN AND BACKUP) . Connectors ST, SC or FC/PC . Wavelength · 850 nm for multi mode · 1300 nm for single mode · 1300/1550 nm for the laser diode option · Output power (typical) · -18 d8m at 62.5/125 µm (850 nm) · -15 d8m at 9/125 µm (LED 1300 nm) · -12 d8m at 9/125 µm (laser 1300/1550 nm) · -21 d8m at 9/125 µm (laser 1300 nm long haul) GENERAL · Alarms Dry relay contacts for major and minor alarms through D8-9 connector · Control Ports CONTROLJMNG: RS-232 control port for management via supervisory terminal with DB-25 connector. MNG-ETH: 1 08aseT separate Ethernet port for management with RJ-45 connector · Physical Height: 4.4 Width: 43.2 Depth: 26.8 Weight: 2.0 · Power 90-260 VAC; 47-63 Hz, 20W 36-72 VDC; O.4A at 48 VDC 24 VDC (±10%); 0.8A at 24 VDC · Environment Temperature: Humidity: cm / 1.7 in cm / 17.0 in cm / 10.5 in kg /5.0 Ib 0-50°C/32-122°F Up to 90%, non-condensing '- ~ - Multiple T1 and Ethernet Multiplexer III ORDERING OP-XL T1/*/R/#+/D Multiplexer with built-in Ethernet port. Note: All channel modules should be ordered separately (see below). * Specify power supply AC for 115/230 V AC 48 for -48 VDC 24 for 24 VDC R Specify R for second redundant power supply (same type as first) #+ Specify Link interface (# for connector type, followed by + for optical wavelength) # ST for ST type connector SC for SC type connector FC for FC type connector + 85 for 850 nm, multi mode 13 for 1300 nm, single mode 13L for 1300 nm, single mode, laser diode 15L for 1550 nm, single mode, laser diode SF1 for transmit 1300 nm, receive 1550 nm SF2 for transmit 1550 nm, receive 1300 nm Note: for single fiber connection (WDM) one of the devices has to be ordered with SF1 interface and the other with SF2 interface. D Specify D for second redundant link (same type as first link) Channel Modules OP-XL-M/4Tl for 4 x T1 OP-XL-M/ETH for 10BaseT Ethernet RAn data communicallons http://www.rad.com Corporate Headquarters 12 Hanechoshet Street Tel Aviv 69710, Israel Tel: (972) 3-6458181 Fax: (972) 3-6498250, 6474436 Email: rad@rad.co.il U,S. Main Office 900 Corporate Drive Mahwah, NJ 07430 Tel: (201) 529-1100 Fax: (201) 529-5777 Email: market@radusa.com 327-100-05/00 © 2000 RAD Data Communications Ltd. Specifications are subject to change without prior notice. ~ ~ INTERNAL REQUISITION AUTHORIZATION For W.ehouae Ordera .nd Other Quot.tJona "'wtI I)A T A I",PUT CLERK PAGE DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC SAFETY/800KHz FUND: 304-2910-564000-2609 REQUISITION NUMBER REQUISITION DATE 2/12/00 DELIVER TO: 101 NORTH ROCK RD.. FT. PIERCE. FL 34945-3438 REMARKS: VENDORS: NUMBER '1 NUMBER 12 NUMBER '3 NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS NAME ADDRESS RAD DATA COMMUNICATIONS SOLE SOURCE IMERGIHCY ~CHAII ITEM NO QUANTITY UM DESCRIPTION .~~~MULTIPLE T AND VENDOR '3 UNIT PRICE BERNET TOT AL PAICE ~ z r ...... PRICES ESTABLISHED BY: VENDOR TOTALS 13 '2 .1 13 800 VENDOR REPRESENTATIVE " .1 112 Ùn,,2- -4. ~~wJt- REa~SJ~;SON '../ 113 DEPARTMENT HEAD OR AUTHORIZED PERSON ONLY , '-' AGENDA REQUEST ....., ITEM NO. C-4-B DATE: December 19,2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): PURCHASING CHARLES BICHT SUBJECT: Award of Bid #00-084 Purchase of two Integrated Tool Carrier Loaders BACKGROUND: On September 27, 2000 bids were opened for the purchase of two integrated tool carrier loaders. Forty eight vendors were notified, eleven sets of bid documents were distributed and three bids were received. The low bidder is Coastline Equipment Co. in the amount of $197,720.00. FUNDS AVAIL.: 401-9910-599900-800 (Will be made available in 401-3410-564000-300 Approved in the 2000 fiscal year budget - funding carried forward to 2001 fiscal yr. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of bid #00-084 purchase of two integrated tool carrier loaders to the low bidder Coastline Equipment Co. in the amount of $197,720.00. COMMISSION ACTION: E: [~APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Atlorney:(X) ~.. '. /.f'/ 1"'<..5..,. coordinat~qn.ture~ Mgt. & Budget:(. ~¡?} Other: Purchasing Mgr.:(X) Other: cß Originating Dept: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eff. 1/97 G:\COMMON\AGENDAS\BIDS\200Q-084 award,wpd DEC-11-00 05:Ø7 PM ST~UCIEC0S0~IDWASTE 5614626':;H37 P.01 .....,I PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SOLID WASTE DIVISION MEMORANDUM 00-184 DATE: Charlie Bioht, Purçhasing Director Leo J. Cordeiro. Solid Waste Managere November 8, 2000 Award of Bid #00.084 Two Loaders TO: FROM: RE: Please take the nec:$s$ary stepe to award Bid #00-084. Two Integrated Tool Carrier Loaders. to the low bidder. Coastline Equipment Ce., tnc., for the grand total of $197,720, If you have any questions, please ce1l me at extension 1 ð31. LJC/am c: Ray Wazny, Public Works Director , ' «:. t........J CJ ¡~fl ~-) J ...'- ¿:- -"' t-O DEC-ll-øø 1215:1217 PM STLUCIECøSOLIDW~STE ,. - 56146:26987 P.02 '-" '...,/ ..... :I: U I .:5 8 ~ ^ i!i ¡ ifi i 8 ; ~ - 8 I I 0 ~ . f > all eo :¡ .. .. v a g - .:a: ; == == I ~ ~ ; ~-=- - Š ! ~ ! 8 , ... fit 'II"" f I ! ~ i U) - 8 ! '-'"'~J i = ! w .. .- wi I. .. ... v 3 I . =r :E II. . C r¡'" ¡ .. .: . . ~' b 0 9 § 8; - ^ i a:I "'" wI- I i rr: .. ; ~ Iii I ~ifi~ ! It fl)lw 0 ,.: .. ~a5 'II"" sa i ¡ ., :; ... . .. :¡ s~s:i wI. v i au ~ f-~I 1·- as f § i .il~ e ~ § c ! m iI I ~ ~ ~ I-g~ I I ; I I~i~ I · z z . ___'_l.?.L05/OO-- TtiE 13: 4.8 FAX 561 842 9546 COASTLINE EQUIP liI 002 '-" '-" EQUIPMENT CO., INC. 7001 Industrial Drive South RMERA BEACH, FL 33404 Phon&: 561-845-2273 Fax: 561-842-9546 Mr. Charles B1cht Purchasing Director st. Lucie County, Florida Dec. 5, 2000 Subject: Extension of bid price through December, 2000 Coastline Equipment agrees to honor its bid price and terms of the bid #00-084 for 2(two) Tool Carrier Wheel Loaders through December, 2000. Thank you for this opportunity and we look forward to your valued order. ark D. Anthony Governmental Sa Manager (800) 446 2474 (561) 762 1556 Cell . ~ AIRPORT ~s o~r~- ~ l.-r --- ¥ (--S4 AGENDA REQUEST 'wi ITEM NO. DATE: 12/19/00 CONSENT [ x REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg.[ Quasi-Jud. [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: [ X] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: .~,r. County Attorney: ,¡:~ v Community Development PRESENTED BY: ,. ()/ ''Ie') j;¿u. t:Y-Ù ¿~ ,/f"- --- Development Director MPO's Transit Development Plan Consultant Services Contract. At the July 6, 2000 meeting of the St. Lucie Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), the MPO approved the Scope of Services for the Transit Development Plan (TOP). The TOP has been identified as one of the primary work tasks of the MPO's Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) for FY 2000/2001, Task 3.5, page 39. This project will be administered under the direction of the MPO. However, because all funding for the MPO is passed through the Board of County Commissioners, acknowledgement of this project is required by the Board of County Commissioners for budget and audit purposes. The budgeted funding for this project is approximately $212,315. Funding for this project is available through Joint Participation Agreements with the Florida Department of Transportation. $20,479 of the project budget is to be funded wi th the required local match funds from the six Federal Transit Administration/Transit grants that the County!MPO has been collecting over the last several years. The Florida Department of Transportation direct contribution to the project will be $20,479. The balance of the project, $171,357 will be paid by federal funds. The MPO approved the Scope of Services for the Transit Development Plan at their July 6, 2000 meeting Staff requests Board approval of the request to advertise the Request for Proposals for the Transit development Plan. DENIED Review and Approvals Management & Budget: Purchasing: Orlginatinq Department: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Other: Other: '-' ""'" COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: December 19,2000 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners Community Development Director November 30, 2000 MPO's Transit Development Plan Consultant Services Contract From: Date: Subject: At the July 6, 2000 meeting of the St. Lucie Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), the MPO approved the Scope of Services for the Transit Development Plan (TDP). The TDP has been identified as one of the primary work tasks of the MPO' s Unified Planning Work Program (UPWP) for FY 2000/2001, Task 3.5 page 38. The budgeted funding for this project is approximately $212,315. Funding for this project is available through Joint Participation Agreements with the Florida Department of Transportation. $20,479 of the project budget is to be funded with the required local match funds from the six Federal Transit AdministrationlTransit grants that the County/MPO has been collecting over the last several years. The Florida Department of Transportation direct contribution to the project will be $20,479. The balance of the project, $171,357 will be paid by federal funds. This project will be administered under the direction of the MPO. However, because all funding for the MPO is passed through the Board of County Commissioners, acknowledgement of this project is required by the Board of County Commissioners for budget and audit purposes. Staff requests Board to authorize the advertisement for the Request for Proposals for the Transit Development Plan for the St. Lucie Urban Area. SUBMITTED: - (J/.-; .¿~.'c- l~~. )C~t~7 r:) ,7;id; '- \J/J?v< ~, . / I ¿u)ìa Shewchuk, AICP ,9ommunity Development Director '-' ""'" BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REQUEST FOR PROPOSAL Sealed proposals will be received at the Purchasing Department, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL 34982, until 3:00 P.M. local time on Tuesday, January 31, 2001, for the following: RFP # 00 - 81. Lucie Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) Transit Development Plan COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT RFP documents can be obtained from the Office of the Purchasing Manager at 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida, 34982, Telephone: (561) 461-1700, or by accessing our web site at: "htt://www.stlucieco.gov". RFP's may be either mailed or hand delivered to the Purchasing Department, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL 34982. The Board of County Commissioners reserves the right to waive any informalities or minor irregularities; reject any and all proposals which are incomplete, conditional, obscure, or which contain additions not allowed for: accept or reject any proposals in whole or in part with or without cause; and accept the proposal which best serves the County. For Bids, RFP's, Bid Results and other information visit the 81. Lucie County Purchasing Web Site at "hht:/Iwww.stlucieco.gov". St. Lucie County is an Equal Opportunity/ Mfinnative Action- Employer. Board of County Commissioners St. Lucie County, Florida By: Charles Bicht, Purchasing Manager PUBLISH: DECEMBER 15, 2000 BILL & PROOF: Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 ~ "wi SCOPE OF SERVICES MAJOR UPDATE OF THE YEAR 2001 TRANSIT DEVELOPMENT PLAN/ TRANSPORT A TION DISADVANTAGE SERVICE PLAN Scope of Work: The St. Lucie Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is seeking the services of a consultant to assist in the devèlopment of a major update of the MPO's Transit Development Plan. Purpose: The purpose of the study is to identify general public transportation needs in relation to the overall mobility needs of St. Lucie County, develop transit service alternatives to address the identified needs, evaluate the alternatives based on the established criteria over a five or ten year planning horizon to be determined by the Florida Department of Transportation, and establish a transit service plan for transit services. Currently St. Lucie County has public transportation service provided by the St. Lucie County Council on Aging. The effort will identify alternatives technologies and/ or services either public or private, and address previously adopted polices and objectives of local governments with the MPO's area. The study area includes St. Lucie County and will explore the potential for intercounty connections to adjacent counties. Objeçtives: The Study shall address the requirements of, and be consistent with, the Transportation Efficiency Act of the 21 Century, 1998 (TEA21) as amended and/ or replaced, applicable MPO and Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) regulations (see attachment 1), and any related policies of the Federal Highway Administration (FHW A) and the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). The major update of the TDP shall incluqe elements listed in A Manual for the Preparation of Transit Development Plans (USF, Tampa, 1993), including, but not limited to: · Identify existing local transit services · Evaluate existing transit resources · Identify potential transit technologies · Develop alternatives consistent with need · Develop an implementation plan · Determine future transit needs · Develop Revenue Projection Plan · Develop future Cost Feasible transit Plan '-' 'wi The major update to the Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan (TDSP) shall be based on the Florida Commission for the Transportation Disadvantaged TDSP guidelines. The CONSULT ANT shall ensure that these elements are addressed in the update of the TDP. Task 1-1: Establish Mission and Goals and Objectives 1. Draft Mission, Goals and Objectives based on the following: · Chapter 427 F.S. and Rule 41-2 F.A.C. · American with Disabilities Act · State and Local Comprehensive Plans · Discussions with County, Community Transit and Municipal Staff · Discussions with Transit user groups · Chapter 341 Public Transit, F.S. and Rule 14-73 Public Transportation F.A.C. · Short and long range plans for Indian River and Martin Counties to evaluate present and future demand for intercounty transit trips · Public input from Public Involvement Plan (PIP) · Transit Element of 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan · 1997 Congestion Management Plan · 1995 Strategic Regional Policy Plan, Transportation Element · Chapter 163 and 9J-5 F.A.C. Concurrency Regulations 2. Summarize Public Involvement Program for the project. 3. Draft Technical Memorandum I-I: Draft Mission and Goals and Objectives based on review by Technical Advisory Committee (T AC), MPO staft MPO Board, and Citizens Advisory Committee (CAC). Task 1-2: Data Base Compilation The consultant shall collect, but not limited to the following: 1. Existing Conditions Assessment · County Base Maps · Current and Future Land Use and Zoning Maps · Existing Major Trip Generators/ Attractors for transit · Major Employment Locations '-' ...." · 1990 (2000 if available) Census Tract Data for Population, Employment, Low Income, Auto Availability, and Dwelling Units · 2000, 2010, 2020 Population and Employment by T AZ · Available information from the Bureau of Economics and Business Research regarding future growth in St. Lucie County. · Community Transit existing services and ridership · Review existing surveys of population regarding transportation issues · . Parking supply and cost · Planned future developments in St. Lucie County, including identification of major activity centers · Identify and forecast potential transit demand · Forecast the number of trips reduced on the roadway from the increase in transit use. 2. Review and summarize all pervious plans, and documents pertaining to public transportation in St. Lucie County, including but not limited to: · Previous mass transit/ public transportation needs studies · Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan for St. Lucie County · Adopted Local Government Comprehensive Plans · Transportation Improvement Programs · Long Range Transportation Plan · Chapter 427, Rule 41-2 · Chapter 504 Handicapped Accessibility Plan · Other relevant documents as necessary · Long and short range plans for Indian River and Martin Counties Transit Element of 2020 Long Range Transportation Plan · 1997 Congestion Management Plan · 1995 Strategic Regional Policy Plan, Transportation Element. 3. Identifý Future develópments. 4. Identify by Zone/Tract concentrations of transit dependant and potential transit user populations. 5. Conduct a peer review of general public transit services in other similarly sized counties. This review will include agencies both within and outside of the state of Florida and include operational and financial characteristics of each. The peer review will include both fixed route and demand responsive service types. Peer review will identify funding sources '-" ...., utilized to develop and maintain both fixed route and demand responsive service types. 6. Inventory existing public and private transportation providers operating in the county. The consultant shall collect and analyze the following information for each transit providers: · Name and type of service, including days and hours of operation · Facilities, location, age and general condition · Service area, frequency, destinations and number of riders · Equipment type, age and general condition · Rolling stock type, age, condition, and special accessories · Average annual daily ridership · Eligibility requirements · Operating polices governing service areas, trip reservations, pick- up and drop-off times, pre-scheduled trips, cancellations and no- shows, ect. · Operating costs per vehicle-hour, vehicle -mile by rider, and by trip type · Annual operating maintenance, administrative, and capital costs · Revenues classified by source. 7. A situation appraisal is required and will include at least: · Effects of land use, state and local transportation plans and other governmental actions and policies, socio-economic trends, organizational issues and technology. · Demand estimation techniques must be approved by the department supported by demographic, land use, transportation and transit data and result in a five or ten year (as determined by FOOT) annual projection of transit ridership · A performance evaluation using the Transit Capacity and quality of service measures. 8. Draft Technical Memorandum 1-2: Data Base Summary and Review of Existing Services. Task 1-3: Transportation Demand and Needs Estimation 1. Estimate potential demand for general public transit services based on demographic data, total travel demand and appropriate modal split, and other communities of similar size and characteristics with general public '-' ~ transit services. The St. Lucie County Tranplan/FSUTMS travel demand model will be used to estimate the distribution and characteristics of regional person trips. The appropriate modal split will be applied to the person trip demand to determine transit travel demand. 2. Hold group meetings, and discussion groups, work with the county, community transit and municipal staffs and community groups to identify transit issues and needs. 3. Draft Technical Memorandum 1-3: Transportation Demand Needs Assessment Task 1-4: Alternative Analysis 1. Identify with input from Community Transit, appropriate public transit service types given demand potential and characteristics of the study area. This should include fixed route, demand responsive, and other service types. Assess the appropriateness of the transit service types given the transit service needs and characteristics of the study area. For this study, the study area will be defined to include analysis of potential intercounty transit connections/ routes/ trips. 2. Assess feasibility of new public transit services based on potential demand, estimated costs, and ability to meet identified transit needs and goals. 3. Develop revenue projections for each of the alternatives including federal, state, and local sources and requirements. 4. Identify potential funding sources for each of the alternatives including federal, state, and local sources and requirements. 5. Identify short-term general route connections/ service area alternatives for any feasible public transit services identified from task 1-4.2. 6. Identify performance measure thresholds for the evaluation of alternatives. Review those with the MPO and advisory committees for their endorsement. 7. Evaluate short term alternative route connections/ service areas based on performance standards, funding opportunities, revenue/ cost comparisons, ridership potential, costs, ability to meet needs, and ability ~ '-" to address transit goals and objectives. Assess cost sensitivity of adjusbnents in route connections/ service area alternatives. 8. Draft Technical Memorandum 1-4: Alternative Analysis. Task 1-5: Selection of Preferred Alternative 1. Identify recommended short-term alternatives for service improvements based on evaluation results. Tlús includes: · Service Type · Headways · Vehicle Types · General Route Connections · Estimated Operating Costs. 2. Identify appropriate entities to oversee, operate, and maintain any potential general public transit services. 3. Review Selected Alternatives with TAC, CAC, and MPO as well as the general public. 4. Draft Technical Memorandum 1-5: Preferred Alternative. Task 1-6: TDP/fDSP Service Plan Preparation 1. Develop Draft Plan Based on previous work tasks including the following: · Map indicating areas served, type of service, and estimated riderslúp. · An organization/management chart and description of a financial plan containing operating expenses, administration expenses, capital expenditures, expected revenue and sources of revenue, and unfunded improvements. · Marketing Plan · A monitoring program to track performance linked to the mission, goals and targets. · A public transit services TIP (if feasible) identifying unfounded capital improvements. This includes a phased implementation plan and a financial plan for each year, including identifying potential sources of revenue ~. "-' · Assess recommendation's consistency with local plans including Comprehensive Plan, MPO Long Range Plan, The strategic Regional Policy Plan and the Congestion Management System · Identify strategies for coordination of transit development with agencies responsible for land development · Identify strategies for coordination of transit development, with agencies responsible for land development. 2. Prepare an implementation plan for the Transit Development Plan identifying activities, responsibilities, and time frames. 3. Review Draft Transit Development Plan with MPO, CAC and T AC. 4. Prepare Final Transit Development Plan/Transportation Disadvantaged Service Plan Study Requirements and Provisions of Work: A. Project Schedule. The schedule for completion of the project will be twelve months from the date of issuance of the Notice to Proceed. Prior to the MPO's issuance of the Notice to Proceed, the CONSULT ANT shall provide a schedule of calendar deadlines for submittals accompanied by an anticipated payout curve. B. Meetings and Presentations. The CONSULTANT shall attend a Notice to Proceed meeting with MPO representatives, where relevant project information shall be provided by the MPO, along with procedures for administering the contract. The CONSULT ANT and staff shall also be available, with no more than a three (3) business day notice, to attend meetings or make presentations at the request of the MPO. Such meetings may be held at any hour between 7:00 a.m. and 12:00 midnight on any day of the week. The CONSULT ANT may be called upon to provide maps, press releases, advertisements, audiovisual displays and similar material for such meetings. The CONSULT ANT shall meet with the MPO's Project Manager as often as is deemed necessary by the MPO. The CONSULT ANT shall also provide regular briefings to the general public, the MPO and its advisory committees, and other entities as deemed necessary by the MPG. The CONSULT ANT is expected to prepare graphic displays, handouts, and '-' '-" any other appropriate presentation aids for all meetings, as deemed necessary by the MPO. C. Public Involvement Plan All public meetings and presentations held or conducted by the CONSULT ANT shall conform to, and be consistent with, the MPO's current adopted Public Involvement Plan and documented fully in the final reports. The CONSULTANT shall utilize the MPO's Public Involvement Plan throughout the course of the project as a means to actively involve the general public and all interested persons and entities in the development of the final products. Public Involvement Plan should be developed and approved by the MPO prior to implementing the plan. D. Quality Control. The CONSULT ANT shall be responsible for ensuring that all work products conform to FDOT standards and criteria. This shall be accomplished through an internal quality control process performed by the CONSULTANT. Prior to the submittal of the first invoice, the CONSULTANT shall submit to the MPO's Project Manager for approval the proposed method or process of providing quality control for all work products. The Quality Control Plan shall identify the products to be reviewed, the personnel who will perform the reviews, and the method of documentation. E. Correspondence. Copies of all written correspondence between the CONSULT ANT and any party pertaining specifically to this study shall be provided to the MPO for their records within one (1) week of the receipt or mailing of said correspondence. F. Progress Reporting and Invoicing. The CONSULT ANT shall meet with the MPO, at a mIrumum, on a monthly basis and provide written progress reports describing the work performed on each task. The CONSULT ANT shall submit one copy of a draft invoice package to the MPO's Project Manager for approval prior to submittal of a final version of each invoice package. The final invoice package shall consist of five copies of each invoice, progress report, and project schedule. All copies of the invoice will be originally signed. '-' ....., Judgement on whether work of sufficient quality and quantity has. been accomplished will be made by the MPO's Project Manager usmg a comparison of reported percent work completed against actual work accomplished. G. Submittals. The CONSULT ANT shall provide copies of the required documents as listed below. These are the anticipated printing requirements for the Project. This tabulation shall be used for estimating purposes, and the Project Manager will determine the actual number of copies required prior to each submittal. Technical Memoranda (each) Draft 2001 TDP Final 2001 TDP Draft TDP Update Final TDP 5 + 1 unbound copies 5 + 1 unbound copies 10 + 1 unbound copies 5 + 1 unbound copies 10 + 1 unbound copies All documents, graphics, charts, and supporting material generated during the course of this project will be furnished to the MPO in electronic format at the conclusion of the project. Necessary IBM compatible formats are identified below. Technical Memoranda and Correspondence Microsoft Word 6.0/7.0 Spreadsheets Microsoft_Excel 6.0/7.0 Graphics as negotiated Maps/GIS as negotiated Final Report Microsoft_Word 6.0/7.0 Where appropriate, the MPO and the CONSULTANT may agree to utilize electronic mail for the timely, cost-effective submission of interim work products and data files. The MPO and the CONSULT ANT will utilize an Internet email account with binary attachment capability as appropriate to reduce costs and time for work product submissions and reviews. The purpose of the technical memoranda is to inform all affected groups of the project's progress. The technical memoranda shall be the basis of the final report. The final report shall document the entire study process. It will discuss '-" "wi methodologies, findings, recommendations, and official actions as well as community involvement, public meetings and response, the public involvement process utilized, and other information. A draft report shall be circulated for review and approval by all study participants, and comments shall be compiled and incorporated into the final report by the CONSULT ANT. The final report shall contain an executive summary outlining how the study was conducted, the methodologies used, how the final five-year and twenty-year alternatives were chosen, the conclusions reached, and the public involvement process used throughout the study. '-' 'wi ATTACHMENT 1 Proposed F.A.C. Rule 14-73.01, 14-73.02 and 14-73.03 Revisions As May Be Amended I ' , \, '-' """" CHAPTER 14-73 14-73.01 PUBLIC TRANSIT TRÞ..NSPORTATIO~_,~~\ Public TRANSIT TRANSPORTATION ' 14-73.02 14-73.002 Ridesharing. t.' f\V (l 2 'lOG;; ;~) \ ' , ¡I\/,,\\ . , ill '¡ . ." - -----1 ¡'~ ~¡")~H' COM~'~~~\l COUtiH fL SI. 14-73.03 14-73.001 Public Transit :rransportation. (1) Purpose. This rule chapter provides Department policy and guidance in developing the public transit transportation element of an effective multi-modal transportation system for the State of Florida. Public transit means passenger transportation service, usually local in scope, that is available to any person who pays the prescribed fare and is designed to move relatively large numbers of people at one time. Public transportation includes poolic transit, rail, a':iation, inteITnodal, and seaport actiyities as prescribed by statute. (2) Assent to Federal Funds. The Department recognizes the benefits which accrue to Florida from the fullest possible utilization of federal funds availablE! for public transportation purposes. State public transportation funds of the Department will bE! used to secure matching federal funds, to the maximum ext€mt f-easible, to accomplish the Florida Transportation Plan. (3) Appropriation Requests. ill W Public transit 1'ransportation funds will be requested on the basis of public transit transportation needs as identified in Transit Development Plans as described in 5(b) of this rule, and as determined in accordance with Sections 206.'16,339.135, and 339.155, Florida Statute, and Proposed Rule Revision Strikeout/Underline Version April 14, 2000 'I Page 1 .. ·.t '-' ....., planning and work program requirements as may be prescribed in Chapters 311,3.32, and 341, Florida Statutes. Fund requests will not be based solely upon previous levels of appropriation by the State, or previous expenditure limits set by the legislature for non-highway outlays. (b) Unless prohibited by appropriation act riders or general legislation the Department may transfer public transportation funds 'Nithin the public transportation program. (1) Project Eligibility. Project eligibility f{)r public transportation projects is limited to those projects and activities identified as meß~ing requirements iflstatute. ill (5) Fund Participations. The Department may fund up to such percentages as are designated for each type of public transportation project by Chapters 311, 332, and 341, Florida Statutes, for the respective state projects and federal funded projects described therein. The Department shall have sole discretion to decide the level of funding participation, within statutory parameters, it will have for each project. ill {éj Participation Requirements. (a) General. Projects involving state fund participation will require a duly executed legal agreement for each project unless otherwise requir,ed by law. Consultants used by non-Department agencies in any work phase as outlined in (d) below must be selected pursuant to Chapter 287.055, the Consultants Competitive Negotiations Act. (b) Eligibility Criteria. Eligibility to receive state public transpo~ation grants from the Department is limited to those entities specifically designated by state or federal statute to receive Proposed Rule Revision Strikeout/Underline Version April 14, 2000 Page 2 .... , '-' ....., such grants and determined by statutory budgeting and programming requirements. In cases involving federal funding, additional eligibility requirements may be set by the federal grantor agency as conditions to receiving federal funds. (c) Application R0quin~mtmts. (9 -h G0neral. Written requests for appropriated grant funds by eligible applicants for funding are to be addressed to the "District Public Transportation Manager" in the Department of Transportation district office, as prescribed in Section 20.23(4)(a), Florida Statutes, in the district in which the eligible applicant resides. The request should include at a minimum the name and address of the applicant; level of funding being requested; type of funding, or program participation requested; use to be made of the requested funds; and level of need for the funds. Where a deadline for applications has been established, applications received after the deadline shall be returned. Deadlines for each program application may be obtained from the aforementioned district office. (d) Public transit grant funds recipients will cooperate with the state in obtaining necessary planning coordination with agencies or groups affected by the anticipated public transit project and consistency with the Florida Transportation Plan, local government comprehensive plans, and other statewide modal plans. (e) All public transit facility design will be subject to review and approval by the Department of Transportation. The Department reserves the right to review and approve all proposed Rule Revision Strikeout/Underline Version April 14, 2000 Page 3 ..:., '-" "wi s ecifications for e ui ment and to include such erfonnance uarantees as will ensure ro er s ecifications ma be waived in the a reement for a s ecific ro"ect. Contract award and administration will meet the re uirements of ertinent Florida Statutes and De artment of Transportation procedures. ill ~ Special Requirements. ~ a. Special application requirements apply to certain types of funding. Federal funds for which the Department is the primary recipient may require special application procedures and/or submittal fonnat, which are imposed by the federal grantor agency as a condition of receiving federal funds. Applicants will be notified by their respective Department district offices of special application requirements at the time of submission of a written request for funding if not previously done so as part of relevant information disseminated by the Department. ill &: State Public Transit Block Grant funding requires ~e applicant to develop and adopt ~t){~~ u.j , a Transit Development Plan ([DP). Plans which have beeìi!f!opteJbY an apPlican~~verning I body are to be submitted or be on file at the appropriate District Office bQ I ~rior to the beginning of the state fiscal year for which funding is sought and shall cover at least the year for which funding is sought and the nine subsequent years July 1 each year. The TDP shall provide a strategic framework for transit planning and shall be the applicant's planning, development and operational guidance document to be used in developing the Transportation Improvement Program proposed Rule Revision Strikeout/Underline Version April 1 4, 2000 Page 4 ~ 'wII' and the Department's Five Year Work Program. The D@partment shall provide the applicå~t with a list of deficiencies, if any, by ~eptember 1 of each year, which deficienci0s shall be COIT0ct0d by the follovo'Ìng July 1 in order for the applicant to f(~tain eligibility for funding. Technical assistance in pr0paring TDPs is available from the Departmeflt. .^. TDP shall comply with the f-allowing elements at a minimum. (6) Department Requirements. (a) Within 60 days of receiving an adopted TDP, the Department shall notify the applicant as to whether or not the TDP is in full compliance with the requirements òf this Rule. At the same time, the Department shall advise the applicant of its funding eligibility status along with a list of TOP technical deficiencies or areas of substantial non-compliance, if any. The Department has up to 30 days to review any resubmitted TDP and shall again notify the applicant of its funding eli practical after July 1 of each state fiscal year, but shall not award funds until an applicant's TDP has been found to be in substantial compliance by the Department following the review process outlined above. A TOP that addresses the ma' or mitted and found .in com liance within one ear of the date the annual or five ear u d te was due will not receive an funds in that state proposed Rule Revision Strikeout/Underline Version April 14, 2000 ,\;f ~(/~ ( s Page 5 " '-' ...., fiscal ear and funds allocated for such an a licant will be reallocated amon the remaining eligible applicants in the next work program cycle. (7) Technical assistance in preparing TOPs is available from the Department. (a) At a minimum, a TDP shall comply with the following provisions: 1. Submittal, Review and Update: Each Public Transit Block Grant recipient or applicant shall submit an adopted TDP to, the Department in sufficient time for all Department reviews to be completed by the first day of March of the state fiscal year which began the previous July 1. The TDP submitted shall be in the form of either an annual update or a five-year update as defined below: 2. Annual Update: The annual updates shall be in the form of a progress report on the ten year implementation program and shall include: a. past year accomplishments compared to original recommendations b reasons for an discre ancies between the Ian and its im lementation for the ast ear c. any revisions to the coming year's recommendations; d. added recommendations for the new fifth year and sixth-tenth years of the updated plan; and e. a revised financial plan. 3. Every fifth year there shall be an update that includes all elements of a TDP as defined in this rule. Proposed Rule Revision Strikeout/Underline Version April 14, 2000 Page 6 '-' ...", 4. Public Involvement: The TDP preparation process shall include opportunities for public involvement in accordance with any of.the public involvement options established by this rule. The TDP shall specify and discuss the public involvement process undertaken as part of the development, of the TDP. As required by Section 341.052(1), Florida Statutes, in developing The applicant shall inform the Department prior to all public meetings where the TOP is to be presented or discussed, whether the public involvement process is conducted under options a. or b. below. a. A TDP Public Involvement Plan approved by the Florida Department of Transportation. b. The local Metropolitan Planning Organization's Public Involvement Plan as approved by both the Federal Transit Administration and the Federal Highway Administration. 5. Situation Appraisal: Because the TDP is a strategic planning document, it shall include a situation appraisal of factors inside and outside the agency that affect the agency's performance. The situation appraisal process shall include opportunities for public participation. The situation appraisal shall include at a minimum: a. The effects of land use, state and local transportation plans, other governmental actions and policies, socio-economic trends, organizational issues, and technology. b. An estimation of the community's demand for transit service using a Florida Proposed Rule Revision Strikeout/Underline Version April 14, 2000 Page 7 " \w- .."., Department of Transportation approved transit demand estimation technique with supporting demographic, land use, transportation and transit data. The result of the transit demand estimation process shall be a ten-year annual projection of transit ridership. c. A performance evaluation of the service currently provided in the community by public and major private transit service providers. The performance evaluation shall include an appraisal of the quality and quantity of service as described in the Transit Capacity and Quality of Service Manual. 6. Transit Agency Mission and Goals: The TDP shall contain the transit agency's vision, mission, goals and objectives, taking into consideration the findings of the situation appraisal. This process shall include opportunities for public participation. 7. Alternative Courses of Action: The TDP shall develop and evaluate alternative strategies and actions for achieving the transit agency's goals and objectives, including benefits and costs. Financial alternatives, including options for new or dedicated revenue sources shall be examined. The process of selecting an alternative for implementation shall include an opportunity for public participation, and address how the public transit provider will work with the appropriate local WAGES coalition to provide services to WAGES participants. 8. Ten Year Implementation Plan: The TDP shall identify policies and strategies for achieving the transit agency's goals and objectives and present a ten year program for implementing them. The ten year program shall include: maps indicating areas served and the Proposed Rule Revision Strikeout/Underline Version April 14, 2000 Page 8 '-' ....., type and level of service to be provided, a monitoring program to track performance measurés, a ten year .fiL--.ewspl.an financial plan listing operating and capital expenses, a capital acquisition/construction schedule, and anticipated revenues by source. The implementation plan will also be provided to the local Wages coalition(s) serving the area in which transit service is provided. The ten-year implementation plan shall include an explicit and separate list of projects, service, and or capital needs for which revenue has not been identified. 9. Relationship to Other Plans: The TDP shall not be in conflict with the approved goals of the local government comprehensive plans and the MPO long range transportation plan. The TDP shall discuss the relationship between the ten-year implementation plan and other local plans, including program and financial plans established under Section 414.028, Florida Statutes. The applicant shall submit the TDP to the MPO, the local WAGES coalition, and the Regional Planning Council for review and comment. Proposed Rule Revision Strikeout/Underline Version April 14, 2000 Page 9 / ...., '-' AGENDA REQ~T J. 'J:EM NO. C-5 b DATE: December 19, 1999 CONSENT [X] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ ] Quasi-JD. [ ] SUBMITTED BY (DEPT):Community Development Department TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: per.mission to advertise an RFP for the FFY 2001 Block Grant Application. BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: [x ] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: JC County Attorney: In order to submit a grant application under the Florida Department of Community Affairs (DCA) for a Small Cities Community Development Block Grant {CDBG)Program which includes funding for Economic Development Projects, it is necessary to advertise for requests for proposals for Grant Writing and/or Planning and Grant Administration for approved projects. N/A The Board approved Nancy Smith and Associates for the Planning and Writing of FFY 2000 CDBG application. Staff recommends the Board grant per.mission to advertise the RFP FFY 2001 Community Development Grant applications for Grant Planning and Writing and/or Grant Administration in the economic development category. [ ] DENIED Administrator ~,~ Coordination/Signatures ,. Milt &: BUdl1etß~ Other: Purchasinl1 : Oril1inatinl1 Dept: Other: .('Finance: (copies on1.y): EFF. 1114193 ~-' \.;' .., MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: FROM: Board of County Commission Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director DATE: December 19, 2000 SUBJECT: RFP for professional consulting services to prepare and/or administer FFY 2001 CDBG.. Per the Department of Community Affairs' Small Cities Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) requirements, the County needs to annually solicit proposals and/or letters for professional consulting services to prepare and/or administer FFY 2001 CDBG. Administrative services cover all aspects of grant writing and/or grant administration from grant award to close-out. Administrative functions include, but are not limited to, environmental assessment, requests for funds, project oversight, project monitoring and preparation of change orders. Proposals are evaluated on a scoring system of 100 points by a County Selection Committee. The application deadline for FFY 2001 CDBG funding is March 31, 2001. This agenda item requests permission to advertise a Request for Proposals for professional consulting services to prepare and/or administer the FFY 2001 CDBG Grant. SUBMITTED: jJL~. ia Shewchuk, D1rector mmunity Development Department To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Agenda Request '-' Board of County Commissioners Community Development Director AM Cooper - Replat - Final Plat Review '.,/ Item Number C -5 -e... Date: Dec. 19, 2000 ?!\ l.' Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ X ] [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ On August 22, 1989, via Resolution 89-252, the major site plan known as Smith/Russakis Industrial Development (Kings Highway Industrial Park - Phase 1) was approved. This application is for a replat of Lots 4, 5 and 6 of the Kings Highway Industrial Park. County staff has reviewed this final subdivision plat and determined it to meet all minimum technical standards. N/A N/A Staff recommends that the Board approve the final plat for the subdivision to be known as AAA Cooper - Rep/at, and authorize staff to proceed with its final processing. COMMISSION ACTION: [lL] APPROVED c=J DENIED c=::J OTHER County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: -- .,./' Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator Purchasing: Other: (AGEND538a) ;;,..;,-; '-' "'-II COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: December 19, 2000 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director Date: December 13, 2000 Subject: Request for final plat approval for AM Cooper - Replat- Final Plat Review Attached is a copy of the Final Plats for the area known as AAA Cooper - Replat. On August 22, 1989, via Resolution 89-252, the major site plan known as Smith/Russakis Industrial Development (Kings Highway Industrial Park - Phase 1) was approved. This application is for a replat of Lots 4, 5 and 6 of the Kings Highway Industrial Park. County staff has reviewed this final subdivision plat and determined it to meet all minimum technical standards. Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Final Processing of the Oleander Pines Replat. If you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMITTED: ¡ ~ ~ A\ ,,\_I"l Dennis MurphY '~\.^ ~ Ass't. Community Development Director DM/cs H:/wp/projectslkings highway ind pr/stfrpt.doc cc: County Administrator Asst. County Administrator Community Development Director File ~ f ·~i"·'- o~ ~ _ It ,;.~ ~~ .H" O~ (),. 3. Tið1 a-... .;.1:.; ïfT1 t 1~~=:¡~ ,,~~ lfft,,~ ~~ ~:9 \ tthU~ ~- '" I f, -~ ^'- , ~.:ï~;" ~i Ó t.l;l~ ~~ ?; .<, '" _. ::u J"~. i 0, ..J; ~f~,ff¡'Q. 5 ~ I,..~~t f~ -r¡~ N f ~;~ï;~ï ~ j) I <I*:!i · ()'" ~~I~ ~ :j[e~ M ìiW~ ~~ ~~ ~ I ., ~!.:*~1! ~ .d~}. ~» þ,g ~ i 8 k!~t~ S §;~'f¡~ .... 1) ?~III~ "~.ï:;i ç; ,~,.' () ~ ~ ~ ~~.'i"~ .... ".;i¡ 00 ~ e <;4.l- '" '.'.. c< ~~~ ?~~ ¡-." ¡ ';«, ::u þ !i §:il;;;! -7~!-ll1"-" p:~~,,~ r ..i.. ë f:;î}!it t ¡~~~ ~ ~~ii;~~ ~ ~ b,q I f~i " j' i· I I ¡ j -1 l -~.~_._-----._.- ~ ~ E~H£ ,. .- r~'æ ?~ " i ~' Ilt~!~ ,-~ .~ .:.~ ~" t'-:-'.' I ,¡'E id h-' ;!':' q~ , .~ i:i! ¡·....,o8 .,' , ',' ::>-'t\ ,.,,1 .'g i~' t.J~~ ~i! , r Ii ~ ~¡¡.. ".,.j -:s c.é f;:> t~1! I ~l ~ H ;T.~ "~t~ ~> f };.:!! ö.!rï .!= I!! !rf~ ' , ) 'rf})~!il ~i Hi ~;!. ..'; ~~~ ~~ 1{! ~~!! t~ L ~ïl ¡l'p H& .' f '. "..1 ~tf i.f;l ~:.e2 s"- ~.·!i ilfo ~i -I ¡¡ ~~ô"! I ' h i= "!H I ~ : .'! f.~' 3 - 11;~ ~ !' ~;.... I·~ Æ~ ~ It ! f I t;ff i!!!I ~ § iJ-!11 ~!~ ^ ~ ~ U¡~ ¡ Q~ ~ ~ i tfti;- ~... ~ 1 )ìJJj·~~· iT1 , i !:¡~~f' ~ h!f;~ ~ . í \~,,~, -, ~ t'P ::~IH~ ¡" .5 i~:I t~ i. ~'o...t i ~ ~i!i;¡ I'!! [~ ~~;i~ IS~~d ,¡ -';~I S ·-rl ì!! ¡Ii ....., -- --.'- - -·'1 I i I I ~~ fAS! lM Œ J$ W.ARSNOO"2ï4GI r-- --, I I I \ \ I I " I , ' ¡ü, in ...... .tS·...l ~-iiooiiiYi'1Þ<t!RiE..-- ~ .~~~", >~ ~~:! :~'~ \~" z() 5~ª~ '~~l, ~~ c' I .~~~ "'\", 9~ Š U i .~ ~~ ! d '\ ¡ \~ ~~ ¡ ~ \ ~ 'i ~r: ~\ I_ ~~tl! ' I.~ ~~ \'t ¡ '. \ .. ~ \ ,'\ " E .(1 . ¡ ~ ~ Ii ¡Ù,i '. . s, ¡ ø ~1 ¡1 l~or ¡OJ I' " i ¡;:..."...... .00_ "I M 1m I I~ ¡ E t~ I i Iii' 'I: f' ' 1 I I I!! 8; I ~ :_ _ _ _, __ _ -JJ il n11~ I Iii! L'~ Gf.i I 'Ii ¡. If.; lie III J I " ¡ I i ~_ L __ __ ~ I .1 ---- -- - I ¡, I'i I al Iii !~ Ii: I¡I i¡! ~ ~ _-=--___~~~=_ -= -=::\! .~ ~----- ~ ' __"jl ~'___n _ (£~lfS) .l.VMHOtH ~ - - ,- - - -- - -i '" ___ .._.. ___.___ '" ______. ..__. It .._ 1 ï¡: 3~ 8 !'r ~~ c r) ,~ 3 ~ïi ~~ -< ~H ~~ n !"( ~ ~ ~Ií ~ II ~ ¡.¡ ~ lb. .1 . ~î ~ I §f ò i; !1;f~.Ï~æ Jll'~~PßHi¡:f np~ II' ~I I'> ttt~ ·f §lr~~f=i~õ' ~ i,' .- _~ ,,.~~i ï \¡~~ j ~hl. a ~f~ ~!;r ~ h~ig ~ t,lt [ !;~,. i _ :~~ ~E¡(; ! c ! ~I.J ,f 4' ~~" 'i'~~rt~t ;!flSf ~ . . f~l~ï~~ tl!~,~ ~~~~g , . t ._f p." ~ t, It~. of- ~¡é'¡:t. -I~ I ......, , ' 8 ~.F·~·; ~¡i;i~~1.~·;1 ~~i~~ i'f'j~~ ;i.~Jl1i'~! t~ ~ f." ¡ " "','I -f ~~ o. ~ ì'f.~r:1 h¡-; =r'f'~~ ~;J í - .~, ~'7. ~.~~, 'i' ~ <2' '!<~;;"'." t~JJ~..~·· II i ;,,~I ¿ " 5 ~~,¡ It I", ¡¡ rŠ f:rí~ lIJO ~I , t,J! ~a . ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~a __~1o!!.g,oo. _&: ~ .8L·tto,'" !i iø "~ ~~ í.i:!!~ 8 w~ _ . ;¡ ,', ;; I . ..~ R". lIff ~. Q C Pi¡' il".-,PDf'1 a h.J-Q:"Z.' ~ n ~ § . 7 : ~ I ~, l=ri ~ Ù¡ à ~ n U ~ it~' z--' gn~ f ,~l £q ~ , I". ~ I ~f ~ " ~ rl ^' ~ " ~ f ' ~~ i~;;1 ~ "l::g ¡ ~ ~ 0' 81 < < Þ r '" ~t ~i ;-~ .' }J >- 'U 'U ;1J o ~ ::: I ~' ~.~ g~ 8 we " :ïi ~~ ~ ~. t~·~ ~ j~. Çi ~.i ~ ì'¡ il! ~ ~ t- ill ;;~ l~f "'OM ( 1:1: ;or I. 00 » ~'! <'U ~ f~ ~ ~ ~ 5"1 z ~ n ~ ~ !!;U ~f f'T'1 8~ ~ .¡ ~ ls .i t è ~ .. ~lf ,'~ ::! ~ fdi"l ~~ ;:! ~ iji;U:~ ~ , ¡tf¡¡t >, ~ t ¡f=~1 ~ -; I f H!l~' S ;I·~ ç; ~lfKf Ô J..~. Z 16._~5" .,fp ~'.,. ~ ,¡ar' 5!!i..S ~sèi. ..111. ;ii~1 ~l~~ ~'-~J. ~lt~i &.1. .~. () I ~~ 0 I .~ C , ~.'? ~ . ~~ ,< I ~J þ . @ = ::u z fT1 -< 'f' 8~ " , .- i:~ 0 ,. " f ~ ~~ c: ;~ 'J'T~ ~~ ~ ~ ,~ fl. .~ -< - ~, !!" 0 ~ ,~!n ~ ~ ~ K '\,g < "",\1 * ':';1-. ï I 0 1- :'3 ;0 ~ ·"N Þ ~,.~ 'U h .~¡ ;1J ~ ¡~ ~ i Hi % ~ 't I"" '. ~ ~¡' p~ ---------- ------ ~ bl~ ~ill ~ ~ ;i~UI i¡;n t.~~ r ~ ~ >:~ Ie . ~ ~ ~ To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Agenda Request '-' "wi Item Number C -5 D Date: Dec. 19, 2000 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ X ] [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ Board of County Commissioners Community Development Director y Oleander Pines - Replat - Final Plat Revie On January 23, 1990, the final plat for the Oleander Pines Subdivision was approved. On November 24, 1999, the developer submitted an application for a minor adjustment to a major site plan, reducing the number of lots from 56 to 49 and increasing the amount of open space from 8.91 acres to 10.12 acres. County staff has reviewed this final subdivision plat and determined it to meet all minimum technical standards. N/A N/A Staff recommends that the Board approve the final plat for the subdivision to be known as Oleander Pines - Replat, and authorize staff to proceed with its final processing. COMMISSION ACTION: [llJ APPROVED C:=J DENIED c=J OTHER Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: (AGEND538a) ;< '-' "wi COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: December 19, 2000 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director Date: December 13, 2000 Subject: Request for final plat approval for Oleander Pines - Replat- Final Plat Review Attached is a copy of the Final Plats for the area known as Oleander Pines - Replat. On January 23, 1990, the final plat for the Oleander Pines Subdivision was approved. On November 24, 1999, the developer submitted an application for a minor adjustment to a major site plan, reducing the number of lots from 56 to 49 and increasing the amount of open space from 8.91 acres to 10.12 acres. Staff has reviewed the site plan and plat and determined it to meet all technical requirements. Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Final Processing of the Oleander Pines Replat. If you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMITTED: æJ ~øJ /CS Dennis Murphy I ð / Ass't. Community Development Director DM/cs H:/wp/projects/oleander pines/stfrpt.doc cc: County Administrator Asst. County Administrator Community Development Director File ; r ~ i ~ ft. II f ! 1 II i , ! I~I I I I I ~ I II. ; I .( . I . , ~11 I \ t . i f if f f H f ! I ' ! ¡ It , ! ! I i i I f I I 1 'I ¡ I I ¡ ! ¡ i ! 1 ¡ ; IIi 1!.Ji.l. !!mU~H Wi lIlt Hm mf! ~~ï ~ }'!i~'tl·;rihi ,"if¡ '!(lhil1 'lfft~" - 13 .¡;,t i t ,.1 ..ð .tI.: It t 1 ~ ~ ~ i ¡I jJh~ittlhlm ·f,j ¡;fhji!¡IWI ~~ . ;i iiUJdf'¡IIUW hH i!J~filtlf1f:in! . II }ttf'.. J '.pJ if,. t· ~I Itfr. , ¡it,m·;tljf!Î lif) ~i~lfia ìl' i1 11 " f, '!Ii'l> i I . ~I IJ {. r. I '!f'fJltt'f"J I r , ,l i! :' 'fl J h'I'; Iii I i: ~J~ I [,I; '¡~ ~t' ~, ,I f" hlllfl 'I ftt .!1 ,iff · f { if fI'; t'Jtti¡ 'I !t¡it;lr f J. . "il!I;1 .'. 1 '. 3i_ ~ ~ '§ ~1~~;~;i:~!~¡I~U~!:f:ftm~ ~~ii & "!a~"~a~·~·q'~~I!· .·I~~. 15&;, i ~··ï~dp'ä'S!:~ð'. S!~!.:ä! .u~. · i~:'"~i ."lql·¡·Uil.'j-. , i"i". ! 6!11~!U,g4~1~~I;A~2,§i!1 ~';E~ · "I M,91~~"!'I'J~I!!q~ !I~' a .~ '-¡JtC"ii..~I~i=q!:~~:C1At I'I~ J¡ ,., !WI'¡ 'í~~i~~. HIS ~ !~ Ihj~~!!t!~ ;i:h~¡: ¡!~! ~ I" § .. Oq 'Ggq"~ ~~§~ni .J~c , N~Ki .h.: ;h;~¡~~:I '~¡;~~$~ ~ni ,; í!4.···.c !ið~~'i ~·U ¡6b'Ji~ I~:' ·f~~,-df§iæ.,a;h- ~d'~il §,,¡S'cA I!J' " ¡ -G~~'ð!",1 . ~ ~. ~ ,~iiI~~ ¡. .".~ !¡~~I"fi~r~!5i~ªt~!~i~! i~m!~~; ji~i "jd!J ~A ir A ei .. ",-l~f~" Ui. I .',. .. . ~ 0' ¡..,.~. < , rt~ ~F ~g !o~ ~rí ~ 1.1 ~~ ¡I, !I JU ~¡ II! ~ r;~ ~ Jf! r H} II Ii ' . ft 1 ' /--y-"" ( , \ " ~ . \LJ ~'\\ \ ~ ~ ; \..~ ~......'.... h ~ ')...~.'.... \J~0' (~ '--....... ,(~ ,'. . 'III. \ . ...'~ II! \ '}~ ) "------/ ~ n~ ~~~! ... >ìií~ "OgÇ ~ ~ ~~¡ ~x~~ ... ~!!!z ......~ ;~ §~~ : £ ~~~ ~~ ~~ffi it: ~ _ ~ ~ ~ :;¡ fm~ ~! , r If I" n~ , r HIll i~ f f ~UH ~~ I' T r I'IH ~Ê ~ II ¡ 1 I. ~~ t' , ,¡Ii¡ ~~ II ¡ I 'I ~. ~, ' if II ~; f I "t. ~ f I il ¡ ~ i;h ~i 0 si I l "111 .. i! i I .; .. ,. .,~ i '1'1 'I, I I I !~[l ~i. Iff·ti i' I ! I,.' ~i ¡ll;} ~i 11 : 1~ 1 ! I tu" ~. VI t I¡fl ~. Ii ¡ 1 ·Ulf ~. I ,I i I I t (I ¡ I nl I, I nl rll I If I ~ i{ ill I Fir 1 (IIi -! ~ ¡ IiI} . ¡I '. ~I ~I:I . I . , hlf ì , . I l'llt J t. J tih r I " i ifJ I IJH I ! I iú~ II. ì I 1 I.i· I I ~ili f ! I~I: I I fU' f 'ff I '''Il 1 , f . lh f . I Iff I tl . ! 1"1 filì ¡ h't! I Il'f I ! 'W ! !.II i I[,ire ilil I I I I J['f i f!a I "f ~ I I JI ( ¡ :,J! ¡ J'fl i ~ ! ¡ I I IU, I r¡l"p i" IIIjIj !! ~ i ifilii! fI' ¡ nisI n d I J ~ ' q " ,. §~h q I I f I 5 .¡ i ;¡. ~ ~II!' ! i '1,llli I . ! 1Jar ! I ~ I:~i I .. I·... , I I I J ! I II! I ! I j q~! ! ! li~ 1 I r'l llii! II ¡ ;¡:i II . ' I I , if I' jjiii ~ II I~! ! I I : !j< r' I' I q I I ' "tl .1 I i ~~j I :¡ Ii; I I . I 1" ~I'I : lê ! , f I I II! i-sa I =¡! ! i I¡A.i ! I I â¡~ .! ! ¡- I ! ¡! i: ! I ~ I , · j II II~ ' ! I: U Ji II; I:, Ii .8 , I ~ I~ 'I ~ J ~ II~ § . ~! i i ! ~. I . II . . il .i! I I' i. ! f~ i. . . - ! I . ~ 'f . ; . f~ ! lij~q ¡:rj¡ Ii ~ 'W r I~ Irq; I f II: I- ~ · '1 01 ir I ìj ~~ W · I ~" 'Hi U ~. it' 1 ~. :..ll Ii - · I '[ If Q. Ifl 'I ~. c:: 'r QQ &-1 Q. - I . ~. l 'f!¡!!ljtfr~rf I i I ! I t'l ~i U! d ~i . ! I .a ;x Iii J ~i II ' If KIf if'fi; i fir ~. q ~' , ~¡ !Pì "' ! ! I f.t. 0" J, "' f ", I I I :,I¡ 9~¡;U I I ':1 .u ~: ! I IIr 'fli" I f ~tr P,! ~" .r j I hr .( , o' f . . f <If 'j , "J r" i,' ! 'f I ' f I'; ..;¡ I. f! I ill p' i, .. f¡ I¡ i Lr, I'{ It irl (I~ " ! i y' ! ~ H ~f i J f J í' .. IF í , Jtrlil' ~ ,~ 1 I ,s · . 1 b3 F I I' "Itl. ~i ! . ~! I:tll I' J j t! Jill; ,t I II r,tli r.ñ , . j' "'. fi r ( 1!;~ .;i I~ It I!. ~I I'!I f ,: Ji', f ;, ~ [II," fl Ii iH" ! · it; "~I' å i!¡~n¡ ~~ k'IJ ~:..; ; ~!M~~.: c:: ~ . ,"("I-""I ¡ ~ ~hf.l~i. ~r ~i' . .,.e'8 IE! q 'h· IS I! I im:n A~jl!l! . f~d"~ ~h,§!~ I ~!i!lii (). ~Ii..~;~œ du i .y í ;-::, ~ :> ~ trj '"C t"'t"' o-<;J;. -~ Zo c;')~ ...... z:> C/)'"C trjO n~ ~~ -- 00 zz ....00 .?'~ ~o ~ ot"'~ ~ trj L".J z;J;. t-r-...... rn Z oI""O e3~ Z '"C~ö ~'"C Ct,) Z ttj rntrj ~ o~ ~ c::> ~C/)~ ~~ ~ :>C"J' Z 20 c;')::tj~ trjö L~ ,þ. ~ en ° ...... ~Z ~ rn '"C ~ ~ 5: L~ rn~ ~ ;3~ ~ t"'o> 25~ ~ -ro ~ [:::jOJ n O'"C c::;J;. zc;') ~t:j ,:-<:rn .... "':r.j,þ. t"'- o ~:; Ö;J;. ;J;.> Z ö .... ,þ. tI: ~ç ~... CD II ¡-., "- x Z C) -i o ~z ~(/) mO §~ :~ ~~ "OJ o < Vi Õ '" z '~ . !{! ~~~ª~2!, ¡:¡ 6 ,"-Ig~ -1> r- U) Nª!f",a8 ~='''î~~ ' ¡¡ I)Z" .-. N>-:Ii ;!It:i!I ~~ !ilS'~ :i ~~~ g~ ~-I~ ~ ; z ~ p ,Ê . '~2~h~J) de'2... ~::_.Lflilllllilllilll~ , ¡p JHII~I!IH! UBI ~ ¡~ Idd !¡llltiU! ~: ! i . ~ I ! i i ~~ a =§_ ~. i i!: ~'B Î i ~ L . a- 1 , . _J í , I ì' -. --_.- . - --.-..-. . ..--.-,... .. - ------- - - .--.--- - _. ._.. -. - DYKE AVENUE o;QV,. I:õ( :r stc'<»': 1~ _::~I~_ ~~_J.~<4.~ ~_:--. _ N.S.L,R.1f.C.D. CANAL NO. 28 ~~:- ,7T ~'»-.. ".CII,!' _~.·W j ~~:J!!'. , -~ r-.. , , t~ ,~) I. !j :¡ J,p ~~ ~j ....n o- S! IC ;;2 g ,'A~ .(J:.. //5 , () !:: ^ ."1 ,~. . "i~1 ".) ~i~ '~I f" '.~: "It~ /"1 , . '--'- I --~ ~ f.-,,_ ----.- \ , -:.:! - _ _ ____.......J -' . r-~~. ::' i~ <.: " ~. ,~ :(~, /1 if (~ ~ ,,/', ~ ; !/ . " i( r---..~ ~,... #;:¡'" " . /t?~ : ./(?;.:.T'f -~. :1;:" =ii ® ~ii~r (~ ~~ .. SWWl".'th_ --.. -~~~~_...:t..lCt. . -~.~_:.- . -11..' .-n"t- ........... .... oonn.... ~ . ~/ I E '-- PLAT OF W.ODEL LAND COMP AN Y -j Pl....T BOCK 1. p.~ .1 // ".- ,-", . ~ .. --- - -- .------ -- -- - ------ ª r ~ :2 ~~ ~~ ~ .1>: ~ .: 5 ('"', ,.=- " :t> -, ;20 ~." ~~ tit:; 'z :0 ~.., ¡:AJ ~ ~ 'U ;" ~ ~ ..." ':' _í '-J '" r- 0; ..~, (");- " -, (~ :E , '.. ~~ "0 ~¡:;:; ~> :"z ~g ¡:Ã' lJ Z " if, ~ --1 -i. , ~J ì 'V ", L. ;¡.- ~ t%J "'C t"'S: ~--3 520 0"%j 52;¡.- æ"'C t%J0 n::t: >-3>-3 ,...... ...... 00 ZZ ....0 <:JI"%jC --3 0 t- ~~t1J z z "'-- æ t::; ~ ::r: t%J ~ ::a ~ L...; ~~Ö ~~trj ~5'J ~ c::;¡.- @æ ~~ ~t"'::!~ >n~ Z 0 L....¡ 0~~ trjt::; trj 6 t::; (f] trj52 ~"'O~ ~s: ~ æ --3 ....,... ~t:I: U t"'g~ c::~> n ;;~ ~ n 0'" c::> Z0 --3trj ~cn ..... ":j'¡:'" t"'- o ~.... -.¡:... t::; > >;¡.- Z Ö ..... .¡:... t:I: "" >r- ~~ I ~ ! ! · Agenda Request '-" ....., Item Number C-5-t!..- Date: Dec. 19, 2000 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ X ] [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ To: Board of County Commissioners Presented By Submitted By: Community Development Director SUBJECT: Yorkridge Plat - Final Plat Review BACKGROUND: The site plan for the replat of a portion of one lot into another lot. County staff has reviewed this final subdivision plat and determined it to meet all minimum technical standards. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the final plat for the subdivision to be known as Yorkridge Plat, and authorize staff to proceed with its final processing. COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED c=J DENIED [==:J OTHER County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: (AGEND538a) ~ ~ ......,¡ COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: December 19, 2000 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director Date: December 13, 2000 Subject: Request for final plat approval for Yorkridge Plat - Final Plat Review Attached is a copy of the Final Plats for the area known as Yorkridge Plat. The plat is for a replat of two lots into one single lot. Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Final Processing of the Yorkridge Plat. If you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMllTED: ~ ~aAj/~ Den s Murphy I . ( Ass't. Community Development Director DM/cs H:/wp/projects/yorkridge/stfrpt.doc cc: County Administrator Asst. County Administrator Community Development Director File "; llúW_77141··'I.UIM<: n ~m B§ ~ . ~'<~ ,J ,p..~ ~i':; ., $.;) I t ~ì- r t ~ ~! ; ~l: t ~ , ~ i·It ' !p Ua. Hi~ ltH ~f ì< 11 ~i:t !:;ì i f~ ;i! {(I Hi '<f ii! : !~ i'i' to? ~. ~. ';¡~n~~J"~~ ~ ; q r~p~limm i~fr Ij !i r ~ if.. ~I~ ! jUh HI 1[ i tfl~: It ~ 111ft: ~, - t i:ht 1 j. ff. f % Jhd " I'\lii:> 1,'#1\ !! ;11i'! "1 ~ t t. ,Ir~.!- '; ¡flf i ~tJ:n " !!!~ !! !W! f~+----j~ ./ rij I ~ m¡r ~ rE=> J r ···U~P:...Arro "C~.E.^G!: "tIILI -~ I (j) I~ I! ! i!~ I c:ç If - '0 I ~o . ~ª ~rn : W~g --3 ~ ~>~~ t ~ ~-n ! ~ !~ . » o ., 1" "-; ~'.¡;- ,fl.!~ -:- If",. ..- , ili!·:I:; ; J;1 i I ~ ¡ hij ~ f if! . Ii. lip !I;i :~r I~! ¡.-í ,il i~; lH in IU ~r ì,ì j" 1 l' t CD 0'QD-! !: I ~ ( i \ ~ CD CD· ( ~i :~ ~ ~!~ i~il ~ !~! ª~~~ i:j giih ~h if§¡ ~ ~~.. ~ " ;HI ~. J~ § f..... rl· t. t. a Iii ,,¡ ~ì' :; ~a,.! ...! -f Q i' ~'.' f~ ~ , t '~l ~ ì ~f ~ i ~j ~ H I H It ~lll if of ¡ , ~~ i~ ff I h.f·¡I~ ¡Hi = L ~~ ~~ I I i ~ ~I. ~ 'f I f· r" d ¡ ~i i ~;: I WI J !! f! -, N.~"03"5J'"'N ~ "' ~ \ ~ > \ ~ i" ',~ lit~. !!i¡ mJ HI ~"'Jlri f~ =11 [f Q .; ~~ II Î'f' Ii! ;1 ;,.Iit pf- ~ ~-:õ¡: Î,1 § ¡¡,fa .j. ~a; m ~, h.:! H~ ¡ 1 O·U ':1 ¡f,.>:~.~". ~J' ~H ~£~i l~f h~ 1~ ·i !~¡ ;1:;>_' . I!, I~ 11..' "' B 400.00' -------- 1CC.OC· z ~ ª ~g ~ £ , ~ S4S"C3'SJ-':: , ", i ~ ~ ~ '" i ~~ ~~, ~~~ I I i;~ ~ ~~I! ~n !I~ n ,= i! iHl; I I i. i 'u i. ¡ 1 . ~' [,." I 1 ~ :.~; i i ! t! l~ill i 1 ¡ :~~' I : Pi l';i~ - 1,.., '-!: ¡ ~- ji ;!~(! ;¡,~r~H! ¡ 1 '\;;: ·1' Ihlf v "" "''', I . ¡' '!'I~ ~ ' t JI ~~:1 ,'(~ ¡ ·.i :llii ~~~~~'.' '11 ;~ ¡i¡fl¡l ~ c....,. Si'"I.¡ '~ · "" ,~ ¡.ï;. f'-- ''1'~41. .¡,t~~~, 1:, ! {',,- ¡) ~.ip~ ~. :i" ". ~C'~-...~-..~ '£ " ", ';Y 11 "~. //5(" ~, ~: /" ,/ ~,' , , ~ ~- ,~ / "" / ìf. i~~ m!L J! I f.r L 'Iliff ~ì ; W .~ ;,~r[ [ Q¡ I· , ~f'" t ' . i¡[Î t ~ ~' i f ::!~~ I v ~r{l~ I " i'li.~ I ~.1'1 l mh i 'f"1 . I ï:1 I I ~it~ :ih: I!!!: ~i¡I:; ". 11 ¡:~ ...."OSSJ"[ ~ ' ~ ~ <~ !! in. " !;:. .~ ... "\. "- I ~ " > @ £ < ~ ~ '}~t-'C'.' "'1- ' ~., " ... -,1-0" " ',".9" /, "" /~ ~ '",4 ,q) ~ ",c;" ~ '" -{)<;,. ~.;'(/ :.-" '~'>'t g " ..;,.' ~ ~.. - ._--- «)0.00' ,,,-",. -Eo~(w:jo ~. .-!~~ ~... "!I' flé4,l' ,..,'t o.!' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ I'r Wi I i!i J H I ~, ill- ~ I . ~" rf , ¡HI ~i ; !!: r ~i ; ~i I ,if ¡ ~ ~t Jf Q ;HI I 'f ! ~¡ I I If ! [[ ~ rH¡ Q ï .J ~ ;;~~, i 1m Q I P I I Ji f(J~ ~ i ,I r' ~ 'i , "f~ ~ I~ ! li~ ,t " !r;K '! ( I:H il ,~ : i:! if Id I ~ !~ N ~ I', ~ f 'II' HI ' I I f ~, L'~' J ii,! ;ì , 1 'h't I i,",~ 11 il f¡' \j,~ 1fl;~ - I úhl . i, fie c :...., il1 ~ -;, iólhff~ , '''-'I'! 1 Iff I! H~j Jr.~í J 1i:!~li fit' f !Ä-~~J.i.·' .'" ·-t,,!n ~ ;; j i~ 1 J5 l;rti,i 'I!fP .. Hff'J' r ~ ¡;; i,,- f J.ft.~ ~.. S~ ~ J~h l"fHrlf 11'1 I . . r . .1. 'i ~ 8 ~;L ¡ (~-f; ~I I J i!'¡ h[¡[" ~. [ ! f~ff Hi!;I~ '1 It ¡.... ... t. r7 ~ s- J jm f;~f ~II f; 1..8~ 1\,1, .. hI" :';~[;i' i'i !8fI ~"~!1 I, f! ~ ;!~;.f ~1 "I !.H". ,- ej' ..iI!J_ o' f ~f i·P.·· ¡' '~I br f r ~~= IliI!! 1 i ¡¡if' Q T",I f~ ~ î ~"".. L 1=" ItHI! ',I t" nl-~ ~ fit' <I'~' " ~,8t . r ~IIì ~ Urnl If lí ! i~n Jh~:f Iii ~ : ,~;[r rfi=H. So I ~ 1 I!i! h f,lf if ; ! p,! gf.Jl( r J -fi~ Hd!¡ ri ~t: ..,;~~. "!F hI. !I~-,t~ "I ! 8f! ¡r~' ',Îl 1'1 f"'~f ~ i~·r l' ~., d,"', f~ I.'þ:& ~.iP It. rle~ ~rllrÞ I' t.::J .f!:,-. f ~~¿I n¡r~! ~ f ·~t' ~fT ffl ~,. .MR If~-' J, 1·3~ -!H~ H It~ hJ!~ tt i!~f '-" 'r QIJj m If H J F_'Ii ii ~i ~ .., U rf Q .~ Ut i f· d ~ " ~ [' ª _f ! M I ! ~ , ¡, 'I '. ~II' n ~! '-í ,~l li f. J! ii f "I( 1 Ii I ~~ f·: "1' -,~ n-' .' :; ~<' t if ~ \ ° ¡ , , I, ~ Iii I > I ~i "I fi\ I»~~ r! r"1 fll~J¡¡h!. K~.:' !: ',,'1 ~fla i¡~: :i ~ 1: Ii! l~'1 f Ii! ! I~ ;~~~ Irl! ~ ~ f Fb i.! ; ~: f! ii ii! :~.¡ l~o ì' ~F~ !J ~ ¡ ì ~.:! 'if I.. !". Sri'O '!..~ · '" g. llJ iÌ ¡¡<!~ ~J-1'~ .¡f ~ ',:í ~H~ in ~ if~f {if " ,!' ~' ~~ 20 ~:~ oo~ ~ ~~~ ~toj ~ ot"' ~ Zo~ t.:)""j '--J ~~~ø s 0 t:I trj G~E< tojoo_ nE5z ~ 0'"Ø0 U C=t.:)- ~C1IZ ~ >< t/) >-3 I-t--"", " 0:1: Þ""""'" ""jc::toj t"'...;J00 ~ ~P:o - . c:: ~~~ z~Z 0toj l'Z:Ioo 0 ,¡:..>-3 00 . l'Z:IZ >tzJ 001 :'3g 0 §Z ~trj .-. ---- ....... .,-, AGENDA REQUEST \wJ ITEM NO. c-6A DATE: December 19, 2000 Inve.tment '0. the ....t...e REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): PURCHASING' SUBJECT: Bid Waiver and award from quotations PRESENTED BY: CHARLES BICHT BACKGROUND: Its is less than six weeks until the Mets report for Spring Training. It has been determined that there is funding remaining in the Investment For the Future Phase II to replace the carpeting in the Mets Locker Room & OfficelWeight Room. The cost for this work exceeds $10,000 and according to the St. Lucie County Purchasing Manual should be acquired through formal bids. Due to the long lead time for bids this work could not be done prior to spring training, Staff requests a bid waiver and award from the attached quotations. Ramey Rug Carpet One is the low quoter in the amount of $16,287.31. FUNDS AVAIL.: 362-75201-546100-76013 Investment for the future, phase II PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the bid waiver, award from quotations to Ramey Rug Carpet One in the amount of $16,287.31 and authorize the chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: [XJ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Anderson County Administrator County Attomey:(X) Originating Dept: a~, coordination/s~anat~~_e~ \~ ,r:2... Mgt. & BUdget:(X)mf!.¡)J~!¡;;l1JJI!~ Purchasing Mgr.:(X)~ Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only. if Appllcable)_XX_ Eff. 1/97 G,\OOMMON\AGENDAS\WAlVERS\Stad1um carpet wa1ver.wpd '-' ....., . LEISURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT SPORTS COMPLEX MEMORANDUM DATE: Charlie Bicht, Purchasing Manager Pete Keogh, Leisure Services Direct07 ¿ December 5, 2000 TO: FROM: RE: Re-carpeting Mets Locker Room & OfficeslWeight Room - Bid Waiver ************************************************************************************************************ Time is of the essence for this project. The re-carpeting has to be installed and all work completed before February 1, 2001. Attached are three quotes and separate spec sheet. At this time, we are requesting that the re-carpeting project be awarded to Ramey Rug Carpet One. The Mets will be contributing to the project by assuming all costs attached to removal of all training room and weight room equipment and re-installation following completion. Thank you PKllc . DEC-08-00 05:00 PM SPORTS COMPLEX . I N~v 27 00 04: 13", \..frame~ rue 561 871 5456 P.03 6~34904.r41 II. 1 RAMEY RUG ~ CARPET ONE~ r'\ ovember 27, 2000 Thomas 1. White Stadh'm Attention: .Pa.ul 1. TagJierí 525 1','W Pe>~cod,:. Blvd, Port 51. L.ucie, H. 34986 Dcar Sirs, I'd like to thank you (111 for t('œtin~ ......ith me On MOl1<hiy to ~t) liver final details oft"c diagram/proposal for new floO!iu8 in the ilreas< as foJJow~, Locker Room, Locker Roon. OrrlCes, Weipt ltoUQ1 Remove existing <;arpet in locker rVOJll, all oJllces iu locker room and weight room. Replace with nigr.low Fonnu)a Point Cal'pet ¡It the ço)Ot· Onyx, In$tall 4" blRCk \'i~yl cove base fur as toe kick. InstaJl S" carpet wved up cabinet bast\s of lockers. In~tdl1 m,:w !Uub,,¡ treads on ~taiTS to 100 dug OOt R.tff\QVe fu'oìlure ìn office!il Lo~kf" Room And Weight Room I ,ocker Room Offices EIfra Cft 'ptt for Future Repairs Total Y~trds ot Carpet 461yds Tot.1 Yards ofC."rpet 2~8yd!l T obi Yard' Of Cupd lOyds Break Down of Pmpo,Ued Area! Car~t For l.ocker Room/Weight Room 1..001'( Inl'all. tear-out. cove baNe, Jtdbnlve, move furniture Sale, Tax 55,337.00 54,2 t S. 00 - $629.88 Carpet for Offices in tocker Roo.n Labor( Same as Above. Sales Tax $2,979.00 $3,320.00 '$489. ..f---,- Extra Carpet for Future Rtpltirs Sale:'. Tu $231.00 "'$15.92 . Stair Trend!/ Sale8 Ta~ !i2U5.JI . iU.3$ ., Total of Proposed Area.. -$l'i\346.M I l" additiol1l0 [his quott. I highJy recommend you replace tht flooring in the eniryway t() the dug nut and small bathroom adjoining it with t!1e followil1g, Endura ~ Commercial SRT. spike resistance, 6mm Sulid Rubber Tiles, slip and skid resistance Endura 61Um T.'tRds ~9~J.OO Lahnr $47!.50 Sales Tu $91.50 l'utsl Proposed Cost SI!SOO.OO , '=', "Z.!31. 3 , One'E"lt Ocean Blvd. Co"f~sjon Corner. StuCln. Fl34994. Þhon. (S61)221w1000. Fax {S6}J286~2046 8860 S. U.S. #1 · Po,"' St. Lucie, FL 34952 . (561 )~35w500S DEC-08-00 . ! 2/fl4lpØ ·.Z¡ 3i' 05:00 T( ;LOIS SPORTS 561 871 5456 PM COf>1PLEX From:T.ni JI~Ob!OM ....,5H98-991;9 Pa~!I ~ Ii \.of ~.. CERTIFICATE OF LIABILITY INSURANCE CIR 't.;r IW.Q!W -1 I I leu A OF INfI MA , ONLY .ND CONPua Nn PI&HTII UIJelN n-fG CSlllrll1CaU i HOlOI~. THI. CE~Tll'ltATI! DQIS NOT AlWI!ND. &:XTEND OR I IIL"TFR Hit CDIIFRAc;1: AHORI"I"U tj'f fH¡:: p,OLll.m¡r; RH ~I~~---¡ I"~IJA~~S ~~.:.o:~~ COV~RAC~ ~_ ' ~~Þ~~n~e C~~oy o£_~r~~A Au!:;" OHne.o In;:nu:aracc (:0 Z~ Insurftn~. ~ompany I 'l\QD~" .s\l\l.~tt: Inaau;·,uloe, Int(,!. 3070, & Ii 11:,11>1' ~alm'City EL 34~90 Phon~: ~6l-286-43J4 ,--i. fi~V4;ED . Fak:561-286-gJ69 ! TIJ;"f"'e~-'I '- ',r ....-~ I: JI:O/J RU96 x J1C;. !;IliA J!W.mey Ru,:! 1 East ~e6n Blvd. Stuðrt .fL )4994 , I I'\'~ .....~ . ~,\, r ;:'. 'I -- , -,., COVE~ GU i ",.' "':r II' --..~ ..- -.,-.. ,-- ....-., ._... --....- ,-- .-.- -.--., ¡ "TI-IE F ;'LlCIEe. cr I"IÇI)RIINCf LIIJTI::O II I!LOW , ,Ave BE.(r41.SQI./tC TO THt: ItI:JIJnI:D NAMEI>;'OWE FOR '!'HI: NLI':V PE¡;k>:: IrIDIr.ATE::J, OO>V',ITHtT....:;;mr.; I ¡.¡.¡y "fC"'KF~.!;\ T TEIIM 11R' I:'CN:ITII'IN /'":F ANY CONTFI....~T OR OHIIII nnn IMI':H1' WI TH RF':PFCT TO "''HI~ ".,!;; C:~~T/FII'>ATF. "''<. I\P; ,<:''':I)F-C. {,¡ft lVI.~y f fF.TAltl, THE ttl$VAANCE AFfCIRt:/1:) BV THe POLK,IE$ ÞI!.!Ol;le£~ "E~EIN 15 5ut\¡eCT TO ø.LL ':'HJ: "TERMS. ~GLU"¡QI¡',, ¡:"I¡C çC.rl::;l"TIotJ:;'ú~ :;I)('I~ POL!t '[:'; ",OGR!!G"'TC: LlMIT$ SNOW', r-'^y -t...vr.Ilr:C:N ru:CVCEC ÓY P!'IID C:.^I~1S, ~.~ 1 "YI"t.:.r~'~F'''UCl .'\O~t~'f~UN.tl't - I ~"'lflJ,e'''I!GTt..1! IJQm-...e"N"l~J!_Ç\JI4 : ,.~rtt -- .'H ...~~rl:l{MI\\:;D"'n u..n·, _If. t .-. ~'--,---- ~C'tA.r'IDS"_ TJ' :.,.r. ,I.IV.'·..··,.,· " 1,COfJ,OOO A ~,L~.:... --. _,~,_w_;:;:'::; 09/01/01 : ·~~'.":·"·"'·"I'~ , ".1,.000,000 i-.. ~ :- ,'"I,'~'·'¡ -,C too,X: ,..~'.-,,,, ,..:~~7~.~'''''',,,,~.~~~:··,,", ~.~',...~0-f..~OO ._,..__ ! ,...,'1'· "u 'J], ..... .. L OOQ,OOO -i ____ '.. "" ,~' .".1.", ,- ,..:.... " 2r 000,000 ~ .. '".-::':,.,',':_-~."""'-=;. ' r "",',r ,'r,·,,·'·'..~..r.· ; r.2, ooo.OUO I---:~~~ ¡ I I.. I.·' 1 __.. I , ~~"MOIi\\1i LIAS Lorft .~..~,.~~ .~,.../.,. " ¡; I.r 'A ~.," ,"'.'" It i~ .. ."'.. '" -:;:-\ ... .........- , .. ..,.~ ~',,' ':,.,:.;"....., -! ; i PI?SlC,!)87ZSIS , , ... Q'i"7(''10f,l.l..OO ; I I , I 09/o~/oO , I , , ; j .. , , (')4/0.1100 OQ/m/n l ¡ , ..-...... I . oJ....· '.' ,"J.~ ! . "'!' ',e' ~',j:., i "J 10JOOO --' -.-..., ¡ r:,,~", ~ , " .. "It' . ""~"... ; " 3000"0 I I ',.. : I -.. ! -'r': :"'I.". ',~ '.f...:." "I" ~('·,r.· ~ I r. 50000 .....- -, ..". , . r .. G.1J:''&OIl.¡AIII,. ''( '.' '. ·.·II~· _, !,......lJI.1, i~ ," '" .:' ~ I .,......... ~:"'...', : .. ": .. ~- \ --- --- ,"1. ~ I 1. .. " --, -~".:;~ '~~M .~-~_, : : 11'r: .~~ 114"IL n (' i .... ,.., ~ .L.~"'.~~.,.'.,.._ -, \ t..,. Ii,. J"i.II..".;.""1 "__ !In;' r.;~ ,.. ~\.,'.""AlTIOto. .un IMP,.CI~E:~5' I,..UI,tll1..t r.. ) 10'0. 000' > 100,000 t 'iOO ' 000 , ¡~ !~ P- or ..':'i' 1 "M ..," J ;1;0'-- , -" :t 19700D050866000 (\9/01100 09/01/01 : __. .' ,. ....', , I -, . .. , I ¡ ~;. .J ;.. "1\., ...: _\.·'"I.,',,1¡1.w:. ¡ . "'~1" . I , ì ' ! I )!!~CRIFTt ~F QP6.U,(¡~MmTiQI;I!IIìl'lClE91E~~LUII(¡'IU~Dt:. B', r"O~Flt_".~"VlS:~¡ 1 Floo:¡: o.:'''''Tin'] lot-ora - Stilte nf' Flnr.id... j. ·',t.""','.;n.:, ')IT ..;- --í. ,~--, (;1:1111"1 ATFHOIIJI:H ! N 1l1uorrror4A1. r''&O;UJ:!I Q: ¡",tv",.:,... ¡'1"TCft~ I:A~¡;I::LLA TIDÞI CLNnI-i h"lll,.il~"I'\ 0.. rÞ4li.Aif)~ UIi:\tRJII.D ffttLllIll t. U'I: ..tf~"I!....It.U 111:1''''''' Mt:.~.'." M": ~I~f'" ¡¡¡to Lua:lo NY !.Ie\:." !It-odium Attn: :Lö.i.. FAX: e,l. !54.56 DIn: 'k.-ør", "'H.EdS.Wlftð: aot;:Uf:I;;1= l:t,t¡LI... i,tlJlA'/.:IP TO ~"'l 1D QAv.",pn..¡ '''nT ~1ii ·0 '\'MtI t~TItt:lrl."e .,.,t!ae.. hAloloR'1 T:"'1 THe t.fJlr fl¡lrr FAJI.l>fPe TO ntJ _n 'I3otlILL ,NflO" N'1' øeLU!IATI~'i CliIII"~jltT, "j', AN~' ~4I'IP VllJ91i fHI! 4"':J.~. r:1!J ,.!t~'f8 Gilt î ¡ ACOPlD 2~'$ ¡Tim RE~.'Uo:tnrVEt, -- --..,. Cab" t ", J:.o.rcf, CI C . .~---... '~,ACOIID (:O" to~Ã"IClH 1aM P.Ø4 I 1 ~ I -1 , I I . j " DEC-11-0Ø 07:50 AM SPORTS COMPLEX Cp<~"08-00 09:48A F~ ot" the Tro~uure Coast 561~40-2461J 561 871 5456 P.02 P.O~ PAUL~~~. D9C8mber ì. 2000 St. Lucie Mets Stadium 527 N.W. Peacock Blvd Port St. Lude, FI 34986-2176 The following i~ the propoS8! for the removal and replacement öf carpeting it! looker room at the st~djum. Plê;!!_ call US if there are any Questions lhat can be enswerod, Remove & Install Now CommerCial Carpet (Comparable Specs) "60 SquarR yards @ $25.00 per square yarrJ = $19,000,00 Inst.1I Bler.k Vinyl Cove Base 800 Uneer Feet @ $1.7 ó per linear foot =$ 1,400.00 Remove 8. Re·lnstøll F-'urniture = $ 425,00 æ $ 425.00 Remove (1 Install New Stair TreAds 8; lemding Remove & Install New 5" Carpet ba$e «'l Lockll'a = $ 32500 Total Job Including Materials =: $21,575.00 Paul DavÎIS Restoration of the Treasure Coast 1950 SW Biltmore Street Pori St Lucie, FI 34964 (561) 340-2080 (561) 340-2464 Fax '. DEC-11-ØØ 137:51 AM SPORTS COMPLEX Cph~OB-OO OS:4a1A f\..,} of' the Trea¡;UY'Q Cca.st 56~40-2464 561 871 5456 P.03 P.O:i IWJL!!,!!!!~ ~, December 7. 2000 St. Lucie Mets Stadium f52i N.W. Pttacock BJvd Pon St, Lucie, FI34986-2175 The rollowlng is the proposal for the romoval and replacetnønt of carpeting in locker rOOrYl at the stadium, Please call us if there are any quostlons that can bé answered, Remove & Instalf NAW 6i\iiolow Commercial CQrpet-Formula Point C()lor~ Onyx 760 Square yard¡ (gl $28.00 per SQuare yard;; $21.280.00 'n5tall 81ack Vinyl COve Base 800 Lineer reet @ $1. 7S per linear 100' = $ 1,400.00 Remove & Re·'nstal! Furniture = $ 425.00 Remove & Install New Stair Treads & I.anding Total JOb Including Materials = i 425.00 ::: $ 32500 - $23,855,00 Remove & l'1eta!! New 5" Carpet base @ Lockers Paul D.avis Restoration (If the Tressure Coast t 950 SW BiJtmore Street Pan St. Lyçj., Ft 34984 (ó61) 340-2080 (561) 340-2464 Fe)( DEC- 1-00 07:51 AM SPORTS CO~1PLE>( 561 871 5456 P.04 . '-' ....., /' .~---,.~.,. CARPI'. BY FIVI-r.UR "~ 3941 SOl.llh U,S. . 'ort Pierce, n 34982 '56'] C61.5464 CONTRACT ~Hö.:nj:i-;;1~J:TE' j i-~ 8 ':'ª~_ Joe SiTf.: ---,.~-----." ...... ....--/ ' -~ _...._..~... S ~t..J(;/~Çof.Jt.!.f!L Sf'Þtd'<j : tfAME; Jc ' -., __.__':J2. €TR~'T STflfl;T ~-- CITV, Clf,.: ,I ~YPE QF" !"LOP'" "'-----...... brA,.e¡· IN'>T ALt.EFt .,.. -- '110 herftby $hþ",il =>pO¢iliç,¡.ll9nl "";'I e~;"'18Iea f!Jr: fUR"ITUR~ !;r" APPUANCfS _ STAIRS :-:! PLOOf'! PATC,., 0 RIP' UP ~ -1 'Ió YD> I Iv yLD¡V ßL."þ«é 1!>Þrf;.,,£; r C}'-. .. 3è c.u'í" P II...t( G:,1Z'¡j-flJ.,'G ..-- lID f/,1' Iq~ ~ (.. ¡?í' Go v;(" ~ Sl/n~ 1Ulr(Jç foIL. Otx¡ ð'-"'(' NO SeAM IS INVISIBLE! Webster's O,ctlOt1ary dafi"Ð' a seam ftl: "rÞ. line forrm,·.1 Þ¡' Ihe Sftwing 0' two pl9C9S of ",eier/af tog&tt1Of; . fine of ¡unetlcn (3r ","¡em, II Jt:1f, wn'n/'.~. Øf mal' ( ",at loolIs IlkfI such a line," Dt)n't be mislead to bø\!ElllEI thill a "l!t1[T1 wi!! not 8-hOW. AsK YO\lf !:a'al!;~èr,iOn !or delaU" Qn your fl0oting. "SUBCONTRACTORS ARE PAID DIRECTLY BY CUSTOMER $U··'OTAL 'ALES T 411' .. TMo\L ~ ~ I ----.- It. .I..-- J:c:'..., _, We he,eby p'or-o" 10 '">'O:6h IBOgf ....d I<'Iale,,81* . cClmple!. ,n .l""dil~r." ..i!h /1,1' .Þa~ 8Pi1c¡I;c;:,I'Qn~. lor Ih.. $\)'" 01: _..........-.-.-.~....-....................'.,...........,. ._.....~,'_..'^--",. .'._ aOll.I'9 ,$___.,___.._~__) wH" ""y""('!~lltll:1" "'''4.. A. '",IIc>..., ,.--"-",-"",,, ·-·---'-··-·~--"''''--'''''''''''·'·'···.'~-·I··-''''''--·_'''''''~.'-''' .-.......--......- -;.,~ ;'¡¡Uaf.r\!~ I('¡',,,~, Jp(lc;fi~d, All 'II\1r~ 10:> btlCO<T\pl~re' in a war{malliike""Mr.r .c~¢rði"g 10 $t."d8'd';;~;~"".. 'lnyauersllon ",as'·I.'lon frorv>aÞOv8 speolflC~!I("':i ir.v€Jlvin<¡ ~.!faIXl$lt¡, will 1;(I~x~çr)l~t;I~t"ly " ;Ion ..rl~!.'\Olde ". ant! W¡II D~c:om8 sn 8!(tr.Ç~arIl8O't8r Inti ~Þ;¡1't' 11I".-llm818, AU ao 'ee~en'r. torlli"gént I'''''" ,triklO$."Cr.'lfè~l. '" d"l~y. "eya"ð Uu' cO"'I'OI, 'l't,lø propp..' tL:DJ90[ [Q .'C"pllll1~ ....It~i.., day. 4<1e1 Ie ¡clelll:..,eaner blII'II: UP. '"" '''~ ""'..""~ /J), # - "---',=,==- . ..._.__"~A~:::~::::~;~r~~r ~_._, '-- ThO t\hçyi: P"¡ÇC-::II, 1,)ec¡tlc-.e\.tj<.Jfl'\ ønd ~)I~~~fIQ(I.s aft hèr'6:~)' sccepred. 'r'~ ~J Sr'. al;th::"I.Zlltrt 1(1 de:.. fr'/to w.t, ,." 4'8 'iSp&4.::l~jeo:.t, '-'Ayr,'e-nt 'If: II be ",,~dt ,U c1Vltined ~~"''7' ACCEPTEI'): ~ignð(l¡ri:' ,J__¿ f)g·ta "i,.,,"'·,\11 ","" ~'~""""'L ~ \.; -....J AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. c....(p~ DATE: December 19,2000 "INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE" SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS DEPT REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] PRESENTED BY: -1~~~.~~\. -- 1D0n West, P .~. - County Engineer TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: . Award of Bid # 01-004, South 25th Street Bridge over Ten-Mile Creek Bridge Repair. BACKGROUND: The Board of County Commissioners awarded the contract for the repair of South 25th Street Bridge over Ten-Mile Creek to Sieg & Ambachtsheer, Inc. on January 11, 2000. The contract amount was $94,247.50. A Notice-to-Proœed date of June 1, 2000 was issued on May 26,2000. The contractor was unresponsive and failed to fulfill his contractual requirements. With the approval of the County Attorney the contract was terminated. The construction plans and specifications were revised and subsequently advertised again for bids. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available in Fund No. 316001-41133-563000-4321 Transportation Capital- Local Option Bridge Maintenance. PREVIOUS ACTION: On November 20,2000 bids were opened for the repair of South 25th Street Bridge over Ten-Mile Creek. Nineteen sets of bid documents were distributed and five bids were received. The low bidder, Sheltra & Son Construction which bid $38,453.50, withdrew its bid (see attached letter). The second low bidder is CEM Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $97,302.00. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid #01-004 South 25th Street Bridge over Ten-Mile Creek Bridge Repair to the second lowest bidder, CEM Enterprise, Inc. in the amount of $97,302.00, establish the project budget as outlined in the attached memorandum and authorization for the Chairman to sign the contract as ,prepared by the County Attorney. PI APPROVED [] OTHER [] DENIED Dou Anderson C nty Administrator ()< Mol & BwIgot tZi!IP. ~ [xl P"""..Jng ~ [x] Project. Man. [x] Budget & Rev. Coor. &,..." COMMISSION ACTION: [x) County AIIom.,. :fJ1 1<;;;. !x) Orig;.ati.. Depl ~ '1:. ~ < [x] Finance (r\1I (Check for copy only, p ble) ~ w (!) c - 0::: m ~ . I- :E w W . w « w 0::: 0 J: 0 0 en . . w 0 Z ..J ~ - I- 0 :E « I - Z · I- 0 WI- « 0 I-e.. 0 ...I o:::~ N :J ... ~(!) 0 m N « O~o::: I- I-O:::W C Wwm wW:E - m O:::ZW 1--> CI)~O ~:I:WZ 01- o ~ I .. I C ~::J:~W il-«z c~e..w _OWe.. mU)a::o ....., I O:::C)O 0 WzZ - 0::: ~-- -i 0 <C 0::: - u. · Oil) s:wU) ~ C=It:: o:::w~ w~ 0 Z I-Ü ~ wz- - w cG~ a::~ M > O-! CO ZZW 0.1- ~ :)WU) _en Cß- 0:: ~ 0::: w 0 w O~ ::I: () ~ C=It:: ~ W 0 z oð5 C) M W :z en > C)<C ~~ ~ WŒ1 . "t"'" _:::EO O..J "t"'" en<c~ _u. ~ z - 0::: ° .J -.:t OM ¡::: LL N U ZU) · C=It:: ~ M Z 0:: OC) N W ,t- D-Z N > en 0:::- ~ oð z . 0::: "t"'" :i00 ~D- "t"'" uO _en ~ - w .J 0::: en LL 0 ON 0::: ;2 0 · C=It:: D- N 'z 0::: D- O W W 0 M :i ~ . - > WZO D- ..... <C en OW~ - Cß- ...= Z 0::: oðen s: 0 ~~ 0 II) o or- ~ · C=It:: M ~O Z II) Z ..Jen <C '¢ w wZ 0- - > CO J:O Z.J M en en :::.LL Cß- ..J <C .. ~~ OZ ~:) cO _:i al<C :::::: :::::: :::::: ..... en II) en ~ N . . .¡c C W - u.. ¡:: o z t/) W - z <C c.. :æ: o u u.. o 0:= W £II :æ: ~ z . . .¡c C W I- ~ £II i2 l- t/) - C t/) I- Z W :æ: ~ u o c c - £II u.. o 0:= W £II :æ: ~ z . . .¡c C W ~ W u We 0:=0 t/) ° C ..: -co £II.... fn u.."C OS::: 0:= co W E m~ :æ: ... ~Q) Z .¡cQ. '" 1J .¡: " '" ..: '" c UJ ... ~'" ~~;¡~ ~i:Jä. c " '" :> .; .5 ¡¡ " .c :1 -¡¡ .. .a ~'! .. " .; 1 w:> ci u c .2 1'5 ~ '" .., " .. u ~ ...,,, .. '" :E.;g .; .5 .; '" '¡: e- ~ .. '" ... II.! " ::E " ~~ .::G ( j ( j '" ... '" 08 .! § :i~ . e c: .c (1)! 1-'" ... ( j >- o ( j en " .¡: aJ ..... ( j ( j ... ..... en .c: ..... LO N8 '+- ~ U) o g- ~ "¡ iio c.."@'" (þ~" 0::: "ª ~ ¡:: 1j~~~ '[ ~ ~iñ a.roü ~.g >-n. 0°8°8°80 gggggg!g ~~~~~a~~ '" '" ci '" '" ;f, :iI:iI:iI8.8.8888 8§§§~g"¡ci:3 ;~¡;jtizi....f;t1~ ~8.~ .,." '" ~...;;; ~ ! >-n. 8888 ~ã~~ ;;fl~ti 8~g ggci ::~i ..", 1J '2 'C '" n. gag ~ 8- § .....:gloci" "'",'" (ü f: Õ '¡: >- n. g~ § 8- , .... z;;; 8 ~ ti " "æ ~ "'n. ga ci8 ~ o~ , .... ~:; 8",088. oò"'~8g ¡~~~~ 88 ~i 1"i 1J ¡!&: '" '" § :i " "ë .g '" n. g~ggg 8g·ggg ~~~~~ ] ~ " .¡: >-n. g~ 08 ~ O)~ ...~ ... 8 ci '" "'. N ... "i '-" 'WI SHEL TRA & ,SON CONSrCO, INC. P.O. BOX 336, INDIANTOWN, FLORIDA 34956 PHONE 407-597-3180 Nov. 27, 1999 Mr. Mike Pauley St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Re: Repair on South 25th Street Bridge Dear Mr. Pauley, This is to advise you that Sheltra & Son Construdion Company has made a miscalculation on the bid for the Repair of the South 25" Street bridge. We are sorry but we must redraw of bid on this project because it cannot be done at the price quoted in our bid. Please review and advise. Yours truly, , J.1/(\,cV.J /4.j¿h/.,., Vincent Gorham Project Manager rOOd OJ +suoJ UOS ~ E~+La4S V9v:Or 00-90-Jaa " ~ '..J ..--- AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C~6C DATE: Decernber19,2000 "In'¡estment for the Future" SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS DEPT REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] PRESENTED BY: ~~~-~ County Engineer TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: ' Approve Change Order No.1 in the deductive amount of $(40,518.02); accept the project; release retainage in the amount of $107,892.50; and make Final Payment in the amount of $67,179.48 to Johnson-Davis, Inc. The work has been satisfactorily completed according to the contract documents. BACKGROUND: On April 13, 1999, the Board awarded the contract for the Orange Avenue @ C24 Bridge Replacement to Johnson-Davis Inc. in the amount of $1,078,925. The South Florida Water Management District is participating in the funding ofthis project in the amount of $1 01,500. Their contribution has already been received. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in Fund No. 101003-41133-563000-4315 (Transportation Trust - Local Option Bridge Maintenance). PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board awarded the construction contract on April 13, 1999. Additional money for the redesign requested by South Florida Water Management District was approved on July 20, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Change Order No.1 in the deductive amount of (40,518.02) resulting in a total contract amount of $1,038,406.98; accept the project; and release retainage in the amount of $107,892.50 and make final payment to the contractor in the amount of $67,179.48. [XJ APPROVED [] OTHER [] DENIED E: COMMISSION ACTION: sAnderson o ty Administrator [x] County Attorney [x] Originating Dept. Public Wo s [x] Finance ' (Check for copy only, if appl' e I'J Mgl & B~ ~ I'J Pu.....ing cß [x] Project. Man. 111\ P [x] Budget & Rev. Coor. ~ft t\ -;- APPLICATION~R 12 AND FINAL PAYMENT fII" PROJECT NAME: Oran e Avewnue at C-24 Brid e ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO.: 97-04 OWNER: Œ ~Œ 0 W ~ AUG 2 3 2000 CONTRACTOR: Johnson-Davis Inc. NGINEERING APPLICATION AMOUNT: $ 67,374.48 FOR PERIOD ENDING: August 15, 2000 CONTRACT DATE: APPLICATION DATE: August 15, 2000 INITIAL CONTRACT AMT. BASED ON EST. QUANTITIES $ 1.078.925.00 TABULATION OF AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLI~ATION AS APPLIED FOR BY CONTRACTOR $ 1,078.925.00 $ (40,518.02) $ $ $ ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT COMPLETED TO DATE (See Attached "Estimate of completed work") CHANGE ORDER NO. --L--@~% COMPLETE (+) CHANGE ORDER NO. ~@_____% COMPLETE (+) CHANGE ORDER NO. ._____@_____% COMPLETE (+) CHANGE ORDER NO. _____@_____% COMPLETE (+) PREVIOUS PAYMENTS: U $ 12 $ 13 $ t4 $ TOTAL $ 971.032.50 TOTAL WORK TO, DATE (+) $ 1.038,406.90 LESS PREVIOUS PAY. (-) $971,032.50 SUB-TOTAL $ 67,374.48 LESS FAILED LAB. TESTS (-) AMOUNT DUE FINAL PAYMENT, EXCEPT FOR ANY LIQUIDATED DAMAGES ASSESSED BY BOARD AS APPROVED BY ENGINEER $l.o7~.q2.ÇY $-40,SIf>,O; $ $ $ $ l,03tt>,4-Dó. 'it $ <1 ï , D3~, ç, $ (,,/..374. 4 $ -j'iS",~ {p 7,IlQ, tfl CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT $ The undersigned Contractor hereby swears under penalty of perjury that all obligations incurred by the Contractor under this Contract to date have been discharged in fUll that no suits are pending in connection with the work under the Cont t that the Contractor agrees to the total final price of $ 1 038 406.98 ' d final payment of $ 67,374.48 as full settlement of his account und r e ontract and of all claims in connection therewith. TITLE President BY Jonns COUNT Pal Beach STATE OF Florida Bafore me this 15th day of August , ~ 2000, personally appeared Scott J. Johnson , known to me, who being duly sworn, did depose and say that he is the President (Office) of the Contractor above mentioned that he prepared attached ap cation for payment and executed above affidavit on behalf of said Contrac' r and that all of the statements contained therein are true, correct and co pl ".,,~., Rb - My commission expires: "'~'~" 0 ert K. Jones g. ré- :Comml"/oo#CCIJS4SS Public ;~-6¿{§ Ixp¡,. Apr. 9, 2003 ";''' r¡f~"'- Bonde(! Thru " " AtJ.nl;i. Bondinr Co" In.. TO: BOA~D OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA "'-.,.. The attached application for payment by the Contractor has been reviewed by the Engineer. The Engineer hereby approves final payment under this application in the amount of $ (~'T, \ '11 'iX-: , less liquidated damages assessed by Board, WITH~CTUAL PAYMENT SUBJECT TO CONTRACTOR'S SIGNING ABOVE AFFIDAVIT. ~_~~~ ~tJ~~. ST. LUCIE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT DATE: APPROVED BY Contract Time Began:, Substantial Completion on: Actual Construction Time: Contract Construction Time: Rainy D~ys Allowance: ~ther Overrun Allowances: ~et Overrun: Donald B. West, P.E~ County Engineer 'Ray Wazny, P. E. ' Public Works Uirector Cal. Cal. Cal. Cal. Cal. Days CHECKED BY g:~: PREPARED BY ~ÂI1£¿~~ Days st. Lucie Cóunty Eng. Depar . Days . ....r.-f"'!.. _.. , " '-' "'wI ..... "-"¡ {"-. ,-.' ! i'- ~ i . - j. ~:. ~- ~ ~ '. ' \" . -- - -.-' - - .,.--. -. _.- - ,"' "'~ it "..' ~ . ~ ,_ j <. C ¿ '" : ENGINEERING DIVISION MEMORANDUM 00-406 TO: FROM: Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney ~~ Don West, County Engineer '9~ ¥ December 6, 2000 DATE: SUBJECT: Orange Ave. @ C24 Bridge Replacement Attached are the releases of lien for the above referenced project. Please approve for correctness. If we can be of any assistance, please call Mike Powley, Capital Projects Engineer, at extension 1707. Bam fõJ, Œ@Œ 0 ~7 G í" ~ì".' ~l r=::.-:---'; ;, ',' L~EC 112!roJl0, I .,_.-. ._J '. -. :; Attachments (4) cc: Ray Wazny, Public Works Director Mike Powley, Capital Projects Engineer ~n", L1 \ --.--. ----.--- -.- ..._.. --..------ . ~ .,..-!~.. '-' .~ .---"" ~ (;) r- I' 1 i~ ¡r~ I~ o r-"'C--- '-' ~ , ,,' I I .: I' íì ¡, ! , f '. ~ : ~ ~'7 r~ _ ¡:': JUL 3 I 2000 CHANGE ORDER ST. LUCIE COUNTY PROJECT: Orange Ave. @ C-24 Bridge Replacement (name, address) CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1 INITIATION DATE: 7/21/00 TO (Contractor): CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO.: N/A Johnson-Davis, Inc. 604 Hillbrath Dr. Lantana, FL 33462 ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONTRACT NO: C99-Q4-386 CONTRACT DATE: 4/13/99 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: (Additional sheet attached as Exhibit A - Yes) SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A The original (Contract Sum) was ............................................................ $1,078,925.00 Net change by previous authorized Change orders . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. $-0- The (Contract Sum) prior to this Change Order was ............................................. $1,078,925.00 The (Contract Sum) will be (decreased) by this Change Order. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ($40,518.02) The new (Contract Sum) including this Change Order will be ...................................... $1,038,406.98 The Contract Time will be (unchanged) by . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( 0 ) Days The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is: 6/1/00 Funds Available: Account Number 101003-41133-563000-4315 The adjustment in Contract Price and/or Contract Time stated in this Change Order shall comprise the total price and/or time adjustment due or owed the Contractor for the work or changes defined in this Change Order. By executing this Change Order, the Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the stipulated price and/or time adjustments include the costs and delays for all work contained in the Change Order, induding costs and delays associated with the interruption of schedules, extended overheads, delay, and cumulative impacts or ripple effect on all other non- affected work under this Contract. Signing of the Change Order constitutes full and mutual accord and satisfaction for the adjustment in contract price or time as a result of increases or decreases in costs and time of performance caused directly and indirectly from the Change Order, subject to the current scope of the entire work as set forth in the Contract Documents. Acceptance of this waiver constitutes an agreement between the County and Contractor that the Change Order represents an equitable adjustment to the Contract, and that Contractor will waive all rights to file a claim on this Change Order after it is properly executed. All work performed under this Change Order shall be performed in accordance with the contract specifications. 7/21/00 Date Approved: Public Works Department St. Lucie County Department 2300~inia Ave.. Fort Pierce. FL 34982 Addre . ¡ . t:/U 'tÆA I 7/21/00 By: Ray y, P.E Date Autho ze St. Lucie Pierce, FL 34982 FL 33462 By: Date ... 7.,)-{J:) Date Approved as to Fonn and Correctness County Attorney ·{' ~ "'U m (Q CD --..10. 0 - I WtI " '¡':. o ~ III ~ CQ CD o ... a. CD ... -4 o .... ~ II . -Eß .þ. o Ùt ...¡. CXI b t\) O(")\) g :J:.2. ~»~ g¡Zr-!' õG) "'m Õ"o (') :J'":;o I ::JeN CJ) m .¡::. o _ =? :;0 (') O~ I D) -10. N :S. c.n CJ) QO (') ;0 I en 00 ~ t.- ~- \..f IoJ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. G-6D DATE: December 19,2000 "INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE" SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS DEPT REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] PRESENTED BY: ß~~ l ~~'---- ( Don West, P.E. County Engineer TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Request permission to award an additional $15,000 to Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing for geotechnical engineering testing services and construction management services for the Keen Road Bridge Replacement project. BACKGROUND: The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners awarded the construction contract to Sheltra & Son Construction Company on November 9th, 1999. Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing was selected to perform testing services and construction management services for this project. The bridge is presently under construction with an estimated completion date of January 19th, 2001. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available in Fund No. 316001-41133-563009-4312 (Transportation Capital- Local Option Bridge Maintenance). PREVIOUS ACTION: The BOCC awarded the construction contract to Sheltra & Son Construction Company on November 9th, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve award of an additional $15,000 for construction materials testing and construction management services to Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing to complete the Keen Road Bridge Replacement project. þ{] APPROVED [] OTHER [] DENIED sAnderson nty Aqministrator 1><1 Mgl" Budget ~ J/¡rY!C::r \XI P.......... ~ [x] Project. Man. ~vÞ [x] Budget & Rev. Coor. t1 COMMISSION ACTION: [X] eounty.-noy ~6 [x] Originating De 1. Public Works ~ . j [x] Finance (Check for copy only, if applicable) , . .,..-" . .' ~ ......, .-~ FIRST AMENDMENT TO WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 4312 WA#8 Soil Testing Services Related To Contract Number C98-01-182 KEEN RD. @ SFWMD C-25 BRIDGE ~ SOIL TESTING Work Authorization No.8 pursuant to that certain Agreement between St. Lucie County, "County", and Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing, Inc., "Engineer", for Soil Testing Services, (Contract No. C98-01-282), "Agreement", dated January 20, 1998, is hereby amended to increaSe the amount of the compensation to be paid to the Engineer to a total amount not to exceed Twenty Thousand and no dollars ($20,000.00). All other terms and conditions of Work Authorization No.8 shall be the same remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this First Amendment to Work Authorization No.8 to be executed and delivered on the dates set worth below. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY DATE: WITNESS: DUNKELBERGER ENG. & TESTING, INC. ~'ì ¡/¿j,----- ~1túfr' p.~. DATE: //,t."'fJ() ~ J/ "..~ ~ ,..- DATE: WORK AUTHORIZATION: PROJECT: FIRM: TIME OF PERFORMANCE: SCOPE OF WORK: 'WI Exhibit "A" October 25,2000 First Amendment to No.8 Keen Rd. @ SFWMD C-25 Bridge Dunkelberger Eng. & Testing, Inc. On or before March 31, 2001 -- Perform soil testing services on the Keen Rd. @ SFWMD C-25 Bridge Project or.. an as needed basis. '- -"--"-''-'"-''''' '-" AGENDA REQUEST '>twJI ITEM NO. C - 7 DATE: Dec. 19, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh Director, Leisure Services SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Leisure Services SUBJECT: lIous Ellis Memorial Park (Open Space) Baseball Lighting BACKGROUND: Several years ago, new cement poles were installed at this facility utilizing the same lights. To meet today's lighting standards, these lights need to be replaced and the electrical system upgraded. Leisure Services is requesting the use of current contracts between the City of Jacksonville and Musco Lighting as a piggy-back. The use of the Jacksonville contract will reduce direct material cost, reduce the time involved in the bid process and provide the improvements quicker to the residents. The total cost of this lighting project is $47,350.00. FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds are available in Account Number 001-7210-563000-700 Parks General Fund Account PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: Capital Improvement Request# (!f Ol -002:3 ($70,000) was approved for Fiscal Year Budget 2000-2001. Staff requests that the Board approve piggy backing off of the City of Jacksonville's contract # SC-0463-00 with Musco Lighting forthe needed improvements and authorize the Chairwoman to sign the contract when prepared. Ie] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: /)., . L" /' ~t County Attorney: ./ Originating Dept: ' ' l Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) coordin~~atur~ Mgt. & Budget: '-If) Other: Purchasing M9L:}~ ,f!'i Other: Eft 1/97 A,\Agenda Request Ilous Ellis,wpd ~ .....,.¡ City of Jacksonville, FL. December 14, 2000 Don Mclam Leisure Services Fax: 561-462-1940 Ref: SC-0463-00 Dear Mr. Mclam: Please be advised that the City of Jacksonville has no problem with any other city or county agency using the above mentioned contract, as long as the vendor agrees. The following is a copy of the original awarded contract signed by the City of Jacksonville's award committee. You will need to contact the vendor you wish to purchase from for the agreement submitted. Sincerely, Beverly Williams Buyer Cc: Musco Lighting Dpn McLam - Re: Piggy Back From: To: Date: Subject: "Beverly Williams" <BeverlyW@coj.net> SLCMAILD.V AA VE_P(DONM) Thu, Dee 14,2000 4:53 PM Re: Piggy Back Don, let me know. >>> "Don MeLam" <DONM@stlucieco.gov> 12/14/004:47:15 PM >>> ** Low Priority ** Request piggy back onto Musco Lighting -r- o o tnN ~' wg ZO ON -~ tne( ~W ::E>- ::E-I Oe( UU >-~ I-u. z~ :;)0 Ou. Ul- u.tn OW C:;) ~a e(W O~ £01- >-z I-W Z::E :;)W 0> U~ Wa. -::E U_ :;)-1 -Ie( .1- 1-- tna. e( U c c w c U ¡:2 Z ~ « z w I- z « :!: ¡:.: Z :J o :!: « I- ...J W « e> l- e ã: :J « ~u w a. >- l- e> z Õ z :J ~ (!) <: ¡:: ::r: (!) ::J ...J ...J <:( æ CI) ëii ~ a: CI) <: 1.LJ Q.. o w :!: « z I- U W -, o 0:: a. w U z « z w I- z « :!: z o i= « > o z w 0:: X z o i= u :J 0:: I- en z o u 3: w z ¡:.: u w -, o 0:: a. LL o w a. >- I- e e w w en en :> :> w w 0:: 0:: o z h I' ~I en w >- x en w >- x e w e z w :!: :!: o U w 0:: e w > o 0:: a. a. « æ () s: ffi CI) 1.LJ ~ CI) ijJ ...J ¡:.: z w :!: I- 0:: « a. w e , z o .... ~ o u:: ¡::: (f) ;:) -, e z « z o ¡::: Q. æ o (f) w e i: ~ ct: ~ Q .: I'·; .' ..;" z- ~: :> õ \..f 3=! ( ) -.: ~ ..c ( ) C/) (t ex:¡ ( ) (,,) (t c% t:: ( ) 8- (¡; 0> .5: :ê: ~ Oð (,,) :s (,,) .S!2 ( ) ( ) :S .... o ~ ~ 0> g- O> :§ C/) ( ) :J t:r ~ ,!!¡ t:: o :¡¡; s â C/) ~ ~ ( ) ¡:: ~ ~ Q. Q) Õ ~ .g ~ (,,) (t C/) ..c.t:: 0> .21 t:: .t:: :.¡::; "-- ~.e :::: ~ ~ .ê f..:: g. ~ ~ ( ) .... § ~ t:: 0 ~ Q. o ~ ~ t:: (t ( ) (,,) :S .... .... 8- o e t:: Q. ~ :s"E t:: (t o -g ~ .!!! o C/) o ( ) Q..t:: ( ) ..... :S~ o 'S ..... 0 g; :s. ~ 0 ~ ..... ( ) ì5. :::: E .!!! ( ) C/) :t:: .5: (t ~ t:: s::: ( ) (t 0 3: .5: :;: ~~-§ o (,,) CI) Q...!!2 ( ) c: á} ::. Q) I.;;;. :.¡:; E C/) (.) ( ) :9 Q) (,,) :J::E 3: ..c ( ) ( ) . t: t:: ~ C\) ò Õ t: O>Q.( ) (t 3: ( ) ~ ( ) .Q (t t:: ...... ~ ( ) 0 ( ) :S t: ::. t:: CI) -.: 0 C\) :;~..c:: o ( ) CI) ..c C/)._ <:( ~ ¡:: '-' ( ) ..c .e ~ ( ) ( ) t:: c ::2 c::) c c CV) (,Q It) c::) ~ ~ ~ c c :::::: '§: g c ~ ~ .... o ( ) 0> Jg ~ .~ .::: (,,) .S!2 ( ) c: ê :J (,,) ( ) :S u) ~ .2 ~ 0> ;§ .t:: ~ 3: ( ) t:: ( ) :S .... o ~ E ;:¡. ~ 8. ~ ( ) C/) ; g ~ c ~ "t (,,) C\ .5: (t .e .e .... ~ ( ) ( ) "E 0> o § oS "5 it I- Z :J o U u ~ CV) C\ C I ~ o Q.. <3 8 w 0:: 0.: ~ ...J « I- ã: « u 11/30/2000 12:45 9543859782 T SNYDER PAGE 01 '-' ...., . QUOTATION Cat.: Novem ber 21. 2000 . Resent November 30, 2000 To: Don McLam . St. Lucie County Leisure Service. Fax #; (561) 462-1940 From: Tim Snyder Re: Ilous Ellis Memorial Park No. of Pig.. in this Transmittal: 10 Deaf Don: Thank you for meeting with me last week regarding the above referenced project. Confirming our conversation, Musco Sports Lighting is pleased to provide you with the following quotation and a copy of the Jacksonville Piggyback Contract: ILOUS ELLIS MEMORIAL PARK Football Field - 50 footcandlls Musco Sports Lighting proposes to provide the following: 1) Remove and díspose of four (4) existing wooden poles and existing lighting fixtures. 2) Provide four (4) new 70 ft, mounting height. spun concrete sports lighting poles and sixty (60) Sports Cluster 2, 1500W lighting fixtures with Level 8 glare control, remote ballast. wiring harness, and thermal disconnect breaker. 3) Unload and erect poles. wire fixtures from poletop to remote ballast enclosure, and aim all fixtures. Material Cost, per Jacksonville contract: Pole Installation Cost. p.r Jacksonville contract: $61,145.00 9,400.00 MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTINO,INC. South Florida 1012 $ìlktree Lane, Weston. FL 33327 Phone: (954) 385-9781 FM: (Q54) 385-9782 Toll Free: (888) 889-0770 11/313/21306 12:45 9543659782 T SNYDER PAGE 132 Footb.U Fjeld - 30 fo~andle. ....., Musco Sports Lighting proposes to provide the following: 1) Remove and dispose of four (4) existing wooden poles and existing lighting fixtures. 2) Provide four (4) new 70 ft. mounting height, concrete sports lighting poles and forty (40) Sports Cluster 2, 1500W lighting fixtures with LevelS glare control, remote ballast, wiring harness, and thermal disconnect breaker. 3) Unload and erect poles, wire fixtures from poletop to remote ballast enclosure, and aim all fixtures. Material Cost, per Jacksonville contract: Pole Installation Cost. per Jacksonville contract: $43,882.00 8,800.00 Baseball Field - 50 fc infield/30 fc outfield Musco Sports Lighting proposes to provide the following: 1) Remove and dispose of exi8ting lighting fixtures, 2) Provide fifty-four (54) Sports Clu6ter 2, 1500W lighting fixtures with Level a glare control, remote ballast. wiring harness, and thermal disconnect breaker. 3) Install new lighting fixture on to existing concrete poles, wire fixtures to remote ballast enclosure, and aim all fixtures. Material Cost, per Jacksonville contract: Fixture Install. Cost, per Jacksonville contract: $41,350.00 6,000.00 At your request, Musco is also able to provide the installation of the electrical service to each pole. This would require a separate estimate from our electrical contractor. Please feel free to call me should you have any questions or require additional information. Best Regards, £, Tim Snyder Musco Spo slighting MUSCO SPORTS LIGHTING,INC. South Flolide 1012 Silklree lane, Weston, FL 33327 Phone; (954) 385-9781 FAX~ (954) 385·9782 Toll Fr..: (886) 889-0770 11/30;2000 12:45 95G3659782 T SNI..'DER PAGE 03 '-' DEPARTMENT OF ADMINISTRATION AND FINANCE ."""", Procurement and Supply Division NOTIFICATION OF AWARD AND RELATED ACTIONS DATE: 6122100 MUSCO LIGHTING 1838 EASTCHESTER DR. SUITE 104 HIGH POINT, N.C. 27265 BID: SC-04U-oO TITLE: PfUCE AGREEMENT CONTRACT FOft PARK AND PLAYGROUND EQU!PMENT Lad ies/Gen tlem en: III You are a successful bidder on t.he above referenced bid, Bid is accepted subject to the tonns, conditions and stipulations in our specifications. Ü, performa.nce Bond in the amount of $ (as requiredt" the ol';ginal h;dpackQge) I!IIJ8t be returned within 10 d41YS from receipt of this notification. (PICD$' ""CIUM b..d nllmb.., on ,.."/o",,,Gnc, b(1nd ",,,,¡t!a7lC,) CONTRACT DOCUMENTS OR PURCHASEOJlDER TO FOLLOW. THIS /$ NOT AN ORDER. Awarded as Follows: TO ALL. VENDORS LilTED ON TAB SHEET IN ACCORDNANCE WITH CATALOGS SU8MIITED. FOR TAB S~!T. E·MAIL SUCH I{fQUEST TO beVeñyw@coj.net r You are not a succ~ssful bidder, Bids are available for inspection in the Procurement and Supply Division (j Bid security is herewith retW'nQd; Check* Amount SJero¡y, ~EVeRL Y WILUAMS 117 West Duval Street, S1lite 335 Jacksonville, Florida 32202 Pbone: (904)630·1134 Fax: (904)630-2151 q~ ..0.... GB--Il 0. ......... 11/3~/2e80 12:'5 '354385'3782 T SNYDER PAGE 134 '-' ...", SUBJECT: PRICE AGREEMENT CONTRACT FOR PARK & LIGHTING. PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT AND BID NO. SÇ-0463-00 DATE OPmN!ID Apr 12, 2000 GENERAL GOVEJUlNBHT AWAiU)S CoteaTTBI: KIND BASIS OF CONTRACT: S~PPLY CONTRACT DATE OF AWARD FOR A PERIOD OF ONE YEAR WITH TWO (2) ONE (1) YEAR RENEWAL OPTIONS. FOR PARKS, RECR~TION & ENTERTAINMENT DIVISION ~ PARK MAINTENANCE DIV. BASIS OF AWARD:ALL QUALIFIED B!DDERS N~mber of Bids Invited: 28 Number Receivad: 20 O:.her: 2 SUMMARY 01' BIOS .ANI) UCOMMBNDED .ACTIONS: RECOMMEND AKARD TO ALL VENDORS LISTED ON THE ATTACH~D BID TABULATION SHEET E'OR A SOURCE OF SUPPLY TO FURNISH, DELIVER, AN~ THE INSTALLATION OF PARKS A~D PLAYGROUND EQUIPMENT AS LIS':'ED IN ':'HE CATALOGS SUPPLIED BY THE:: VENDORS AT DISCOUNTS PROVIDED ON BIDS. ATTACHMENTS: 1) BID TABULATION J ~c.~œ. ~ \C~ d.def5 2)MEMO FROM PARK~, RECREATION & EN1ERTAINMENT CIVIS:ON 3)SCOPE B iU!:SPEC'rFULt.y SUBMIT'l'Bt) BUYER Conour~.~e. By: PARKS, RECREATION & ENTERTAINMENT :::nv. *****.*.******.*************.*..***********.*.******.*..**************** (ALL AWARDS ACTIONS SUBJECT TO AVAILABILITY OF FUNDS) AC'rION 01' AWA1U:IS COMMITTEE ON RECOMMKNDATIONS ABOVE DATE: lAY 25 2000. MZNBERS APPROVING_ NEMBERS t1ISUPROVING - OTHER ..********.****************************.***********,'~~l*~********** ACTJ:ON OF AWAlUJING AUTH.øJ(ÍTY Date: 111'\ App~ov.d ~ Di..p'p~ov.d: O~her: SIGNATURE OF At1TSENTlCATI:ON ~ t1f. ~ 11/30/20e0 12:46 9543859782 T SNvDER -....,. PAGE 85 ......, Musco's Proposal Pricing is for equipment that meets in all respects the City of Jacksonville's sports lighting guidelines and specifications. " MUSCO'S PRICE LIST All Prices are. Delivered· Terms: 25% wIth order, Net 20 days on delivery Initial Levels Shown on Musco's Scans are Guaranteed Musco's Light Structure System (LSS) Please see attached Literature. This is a complete sports lighting system complete with everything from the ground UPI including the concrete base insert. The LSS comes only with remote bal1ast enclosure, with disconnect. 40' mtg hgt With 2 each SÇ-2 Fixtures $2,980 40' mtg hgt With 8 each SC-2 Fíxture~ $8,333 50' mtg hgt With 2 each SC-2 Fixtures $4,~3& 60' mtg hgt with 2 each SC-2 Fixtures $3,703 60' mt.g hgt With 7 each SC-2 Fixtures $8.392 60' mtg hgt with 13 each SCw2 Fixtures $12,500 70' mtg hgt with 2 each SC-2 Fixtures $4,315 70' mtg hgt with 7 each SC-2 Píxtures $9,625 Add $835. Per fixture for additional fi.xtures, up to a total of 7 fixtures. Add $8.35. Pet fìxtlJI~ for additional fixtures, up to a total of 27 fixtures. Add $835 per fixtw.-e for additional fixtures, up to a total of 12 fixtures. Add $835. Per fixture for additional fIxtures. up to a total of 6 fixtures. Add $835 per fixture for additional fixtures, up to a total of 12 fixtures. Add $835 per fixture for additional fixtures, up to a total of 19 fiMurcs. Add $835 per fixture for additional fixtures. up to a total of 6 fixtures. Add $835 per fixture for additional fixtures, up to a total of 13 fix.tures. 11/3e/2eøe 12:46 9543859782 T SNYDER ,. PAGE 0E -- .. Page 2 . City of Jacksonville· 2000 Musco Pricing 70' mtg hgt with 14 each SC-2 Fixtures $15,800 80' mtg hgt with 2 each SC-2 Fixtures $5,565 80' mtg hgt with 8 each SC-2 Fixtures $11,455 80' mtg hgt with 20 each SC-2 Fixtures $23,785 90' mtg hgt with 2 each SC-2 Fixtures $9,550 90' mtg hgt with 13 each SC-2 Fixtures $19,900 90' mtg hgt with 24 each SC-2 Fixtures $34,875 100' mtg hgt with 9 each SC-2 Fixtures $]7,316 100' mtg hgt with 16 each SC·2 Fixtures $29,100 Add $835 per fixture for additionaJ fixtures, up to a total of 27 fixtures. Add $835 per fixture for additional. fixtures, up to a total of 7 fixtw·es. Add $835 per fixture for additional fixtures, up to a tot a] of 19 fixtures. Add $835 per fixture for additional fixtures, up to a total of 33 fixtures. Add $835 per fixture for additional fixtures, up to a total of 12 fixtures. Add $835 per fixture for additional fixtw'es, up to a total of 23 fixtures. Add $835 per fixture for additional fixtures, up to a tot a] of 40 fixtures. Add $835 per f.1Xture for additional fixtures, up to a total of 15 fixtures. Add $835 per fixture for additional fixtures. up to a totaJ of 28 fi:\tures. Included in the above prices are delivery jobsite (tailgated), 7 year parts and labor warranty as stated in accompanying literature (lamps for 2 years); sealed foundatiol1 designs by a Florida Structural PE meeting 100 mph winds, ASCE 7-95 and SBC-97. NOTE: For 110 mph winds meeting ASCE 7-95 and SBC-97 standards, please add 9% to the above Light Structure System equipment prices. 11/30/2000 12:45 '3542F.5'3782 T SWDER PAGE 07 .. - - Page 3 - City of JatkSODville· 2000 Musco Pricing Musco Ten Club Warranty Musco wi11 provide complete 10 year parts and labor warranty on the entire Light Structure System including lamp replacement. Service is based on a 300 hour per year lamp usage. Optional programs for 600 and 900 hours are available - contact Musco for more details. Add $133.00 per fixture on each Light StrUCture Pole. See attached 10 Club Service brochure for complete program detaHs. Musco Multi Watt Option Musco's Multi Watt option provides for a high low dimming option for the 1500 watt and 1000 watt systems. System indudes pre-wiring of system in the SportsclusteJ:' Remote Electrical Enclosure for LSS and SC-2 products. A Multi Watt Control Panel is required for each zone that is to be controlled. ADD: $56.00/fixture for each lamp to be controlled by the Multi Watt system ADD: $975.00 per ~one for each area to be controlled for Multi Watt Control Box. Musco Control LinklContactor Cabinet System Musco's Control Link system provides a simple, cost effective way to control and operate your líghts. Control Link's wireless control system performs according to schedules you define. Musco's factory assembled Lighting Contactor Cabinets are custom de.signed to work with the Control Link. system. Package includes (1) Control Link system. with one year of communication by Musco along with our large 72" x. 24" contoctor cabinet with (8) 60 amp contactors and (2) OOA swìtches. Initial on-site training and commissioning ûf the system is included. Price: $6,100.00 Musco's Sportscluster Fixtures Pre.wired. pre-Aimed with necessary brackets to attach to poles For use on poles by others (not included) Standard Lamp with Symmetrical Reflector Lamps are either Philips, GE or Sylvatùa. SC-l SC-I Remote Ballast Remote Ballast l000W 1500 W $549.00 $549.00 11/30;28e0 12:45 9543859782 T SNvDEF: PAGE 138 Page 4 - City of Jacksonville - 2000 Musco Pricing Musco "Z" Lamp with Symmetrkal Reflector with Lower Inserts Lamp is mfgr'd by Philips IMPORTANT: The City of Jacksonville recognizes that different manufacturers require different fixture quantities to achieve the inítiallevels specified for a particular sports lighting site. Thus, the prices quoted per fiJtture are not relevant to "Best Buy for the City of Jacksonville" until the City then provides each manufacturer the size of the area (field) they wish to light (defined by grid counts and grid size) and the initialligÞt levels to be achieved, SC-2 SC-2 Remote Ballast Remote Ballast 1000 W 1500 W $592.00 $592.00 Spill and Glare Control: Level 8 visor (90% spill and glare control).. . .. . .. .... . . . .$73.00 eaçh Can be added to existing SC-l or SC-2 fixtures w/o reduction in field Light Levels. TLC (total light contrel)......,.,...........·.,...···..·..·.. ...$158.00 each (*)TI..C wilJ result in 0 light sp1ll onto :nearby residential properties. When considering TLC, additional fixtures may be required to retain initial Light Levels. Disconnect Add~r: On any of the remote ballast above add $180.00 to each pole, to have a Th<:nnal Magnetic Disconnect included m the remote electrical enclosure (up to 18 fixtures per pole). Retro-Fit SC-l: (Musco's Older Technology. presently installed at numerous sites in Jacksonville) to SC-2 technology - (25% more light per fixture for same KW consumption). SC~1 to SC-2Z... ......... ... .., ...... ........ ,..$141.00 each Package Includes: Refle,ctoT Insert 1500 W Spring-Loaded Z-Lamp Replacement Centering Ring Musco's Gym-Pak BuiJt specifically for gymnasiums Remote BallastIDual Level Lighting for PB and Competitive Play Listed below, please find "Gym-Pak Systems" for various size gymnasiums and/or different light le"els. Gym-pa}( 8 8 each Gym-Pal< Fixtures $5,51200 Gym-Pal< 12 12 eaçh Gym-Pak. Fixtur¢s $8,268.00 11/30/2000 12:45 9543859782 T SNVDER PAGE 09 '-" -..""I Page 5 . City of Jacksonville· 2000 Musco Pricing Gym~Pak 16 16 each Oym-pak Fixtures $11,024.00 Gym-Pak 20 20 each Gym-Pale Fixtures $13,780.00 Gym-Pak 24 24 each Oym-Pak Fixtures $16,536.00 Per fixture price is $689.00 each, which includes all items, is dehvel'~d and warranted.. Ph~ase refer to attached literature. For aU projects of less than 8 fixtures, please add sbippinl charge of 4 % of order to bandle additional freight costs. MUSCO "POLE IN THE AIR" INSTALLATION OPTION The Musco Light Strocture System can be purchased "installed" by a licensed EleçtricaJ Contractor certified by Musco. This price will include unloadmg of the equipment upon arrival to the job site, e.~cavation of the holes, assembly of the poles and luminaires, all pole wiring, installation of the prestress foundations with concrete! backfill, pole erection and lummaire aìming. Wiring for the Light Structure System is from tbe lights/luminaire. assembly down to the remote electrical enclosure at the base of the pole where it will be terminated on the Musco supplied disconnect breaker. No~e: Installation assumes standard soils of 2000 psf with no rock or abnonnal collapsing holes. Abo, reasonable, access to the pole locations must be provided and owner to dispose of excavated spoils from augured hole. Musco will provide final footcandle testing upon installation and en:rgizing of th= lighting system. Owner to supply underground electrical feeders, ground rods, panelboard. labor and transfonner to energìze the lighting system. No Power Company fees are included in these pnces. Pole Size 50' 60' 70' pole wIth 1 to 13 fixtures 70' pole with 14 to 27 flxtures 80' pole with 1 to 19 fixtures 80' pole with 20 to 33 fixtures 90' pole with 1 to 12 fixtures 90' pole with 13 to 40 fi.xtures 1 DO' pole with 1 to 15 fixtures 100' pole with 16 to 28 fixtures Cost Per Pole $1,500.00 $1,900.00 $2,300,00 $2,600.00 $2,800.00 $2,900.00 $3,300.00 $3,400.00 $3,500.00 $3,600.00 11/30/2000 12:45 9543859782 T SNvDER ~ PAGE 10 ......, PA,R.TS LI$T Lamps: 1500 W Z-Lamp (RlLA-MHlSZ) 1500 W Z Lamp Retrofit (RILA-Mh15ZS) 1500 W Lamp (RILA~MH15) 1000 W Z Lamp (RlLA·MHlOZ) 1000 W Z Lamp Retrofit (RILA-:wIlOZS) 1000 W Lamp (RILA-MHIO) Page 6· City of Jacksonville - 2000 Musco Priclng Ballast & Capacitors: 1500 W Capacitor (R/Cap-MHI5) 1500 W 480V Ballast (RlBAL-480~15) 1500 QV Ballast (RlBAL-QVMHl~) 1000 W Capacitor (RICap-MHIO) 1000 W 480V Ballast (r?BAL-480MHIO) 1000 QV Ballast (RlBal-QVMHlO) Fixture Components: Knuckle/Cone Assemb1y (R/999-KC) LensIRing Assembly (R/999-GA) Reflector (RI999-RRSC-1) , Nema Type 2,3,4,5 and 6 Reflector (R/999-RRSC-2) Nema Type 2,3,4,5 and 6 Reflector (RI999( -RRL V8) Nema Type 2,3,4,5 and 6 W ARRANTlts $63.00 $90.00 $59.00 $63.00 $90.00 $63.00 $30.00 $141.00 $141.00 $30.00 $116.00 $116.00 $35.00 $31.00 $~2.00 $83.00 $83.00 Plea.se refer to Musco's warranty shown on the product literature provided. ----, , /' Y '-' ...., AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. ~ DATE: December 19, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Aariculture Anita S. BY: af!ßÚ Neal TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners consider the approval of establishing a set mileage reimbursement for the Extension Director at $300/month, and Agents, the Horticulture Specialist and one Program Assistant at $225/month to be paid on a monthly basis effective January 1, 2001. BACKGROUND: see attached memo FUNDS AVAIL.: 001-3715-540010-300 Car Allowance PREVIOUS ACTION: Item tabled during 12/5/00 BOCC meeting until more detailed justification or mileage recalculations were complete. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the establishment of a set mileage reimbursement for the Extension Director at $300/month, and Agents, the Horticulture Specialist and one Program Assistant at $225/month to be paid on a monthly basis effective January 1, 2001. [ X ] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED g nderson ounty Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: Review and Approvals County Attorney: ~.rchasing : Management & Budget -1YJ/Yi9 Originating Dept. Othe r#Æ. I fI¡Q__ Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 ¥ ...., AGRICULTURE MEMORANDUM "- '----. .....~- ~. -. -. ..-._'~".'..'-"'.~-."'-'-' " __ ·n.",_··_ '"_,-'C _~".' .,._:,^,...c.__:::.~_~ .-"'C·,..~.-_yC';;~.;··.-··,-..,,-'7~_'" filii! TO: Doug Anderson, County Administrator FROM: Anita Neal, Interim County Extension Director DATE: December 14,2000 RE: Extension Agents' Mileage Reimbursements for FY2000-2001 Attached please find a September mileage log for Extension staff members listed below, and the amount approved for each agent per month in the FYOO-01 budget. Although the actual mileage for September may calculate to a higher or lower rate than requested in the budget, the request is based on an estimated average for the year. As a matter of explanation, Agents attend a statewide conference out of the county every September which reduces the amount of mileage they would usually be incurring in a nonnal month. Also, because of previous Board action, the Agents have already been paid for the first three months of the fiscal year and these rates should be effective as of January 1,2001. AGENT MILES TRAVELED ACTUAL AVERAGED IN SEPT. 2000 REIMBURSEMENT REIMBURSEMENT @ .29/MILE REQUESTED Anita S. Neal 762 $220.98 $300.00 John W. Hebb, Jr. 760 $220.40 $225.00 Debbie McNeill 812 $235.48 $225.00 Diane C. Franzen 668 $193.72 $225.00 LeRoy Creswell 738 $214.02 $225.00 Kenneth T. Gioeli 661 $208.80 $225.00 Ed Skvarch 677 $196.33 $225.00 -.-.. Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the establishment of a set mileage reimbursement for the Extension Director, the Agents, the Horticulture Specialist and one Program Assistant to be paid on a montly basis effective January 1. 2001. ASN/ca '-" ST. LUCIE COUNTY ...".¡ COOPERATIVE EXTENSION MILEAGE LOG: MONTII OF _September 2000 . I certify that the mileage listed below was incurred in the performance of my official duties. Signed: Total Miles: 7hÎ Approved: Date: OC'tÎlhPr 10, ÎOOO Signature Agriculture Department Anita S. Neal Name of Employee (typed) Date Destination Purpose Odometer at Odometer Total Departure on Return Miles 9/1/00 Home to Dupuis Reserve check on landscape planting 59782 59792 10 and return (vacation day) mileage to county line 9/3/00 Home to St. Lucie Pick up materials to review 59843 59891 48 Extension to Home Depot for training class and and Publix and return purchase supplies for training class the next day 9/5/00 St. Lucie Extension to review materials for Mango 59917 59937 20 IRREC and Home demonstration project 9/6/00 St. Lucie Extension to attend Strategic Planning 59948 59964 16 Administration Building committee meeting and return 9/7 /00 St. Lucie Extension to attend department head staff 59978 60029 51 Administration Building to meeting, discuss landscape Hospice to WPSL and plan, and record radio show return 9/7/00 S1. Lucie Extension to attend County budget 60029 60045 16 Administration Building hearing and home 9/9/00 Home to Southern Oaks Review garden site, get 60059 60107 48 Middle School, to St. Lucie ready for planting vegetable Extension, to South garden and collect soil .,.. f-.. County Nursery and home samples from grower 9/11/00 Home to Staples to St. Pick up supplies for meeting, 60121 60160 39 Lucie Extension to IRREC and pick up plant cuttings for and home Master Gardener training 1 .... ~0178 9/12/00 Home to Home Depot, pick up supplies for training, 60220 42 Publix, St. L uc ie attend Agent conference, Extension, F AEP meeting, attend class and complete IRREC, St. L uc ie Extension pro gram Extension and home 9/15/00 FAEP, to home to S1. pick up paperWork at home, 60287 60331 44 Lucie Extension to South sign documents and check a county site and home residential site for chinch bugs 9/18/00 S1. Lucie Extension to Check residential lawn for 60373 60406 33 South county sites damage and pick up shrub sample for diagnosis 9/19/00 Home to South county select diagnostic examples 60412 60435 23 vicinity, St. Lucie for training class Extension 9/19/00 St. Lucie Extension to pick up paperwork, attend 60435 60460 25 IRREC to St. Lucie training class and finalize Extension and home power point presentation 9/20/00 St. Lucie Extension to review pasture problems and 60485 60513 28 North County Ranch and take samples return 9/20/00 S1. Lucie Extension to reVIew literature for up- 60513 60538 25 USDA and home commg program 9/21/00 Home to South County review landscape for design 60558 60610 52 site, Administration advice, attend department building and on to S1. Lucie head staff meeting County Extension 9/22/00 St. Lucie Extension to S1. identify plant materials and 60623 60644 21 Lucie West and home problems in landscape 9/23/00 Home to S1. Lucie pick up additional paperwork 60671 60719 48 Extension to S1. Lucie then make presentation to Main Library and home vendors of Downtown Farmers Market 9/25/00 Home to South county Select test examples, drop 60791 60861 70 area, S1. Lucie Extension, off cuttings to nursery and West County, Home Depot pick up bedding plants 1 f-.. and home 9/26/00 Home to Downtown attend month Market Board 60882 60931 49 Farmers Market to St. meeting, attend meeting with Lucie Extension to USDA USDA staff and researcher and home 2 9/27/00 St. Lucie E ~ attend Strategic planning ~0949 60965 16 xtenslOn to Administration building, committee meeting and return 9/27/00 St. Lucie Extension to site visit to residential home 60965 60984 19 South County and home 9/30/00 Home to St. Lucie pick up materials, review 61011 61030 19 Extension and return mail, review and send e-mails TOTAL 762 ..... 3 '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY -."",,¡I COOPERATIVE EXTENSION MILEAGE LOG: MONTH OF _September 2000 I certify that the as incurred in the performance of my official duties. Total Miles: 7f10 7 Date: Novf>mhf>r 17 ?OOO , Signature John W. Hebb Jr. Name of Employee (typed) Agriculture Department Date Destination Purpose Odometer at Odometer Total Departure on Return Miles 9/5/00 Extension office to South Teaching/Speaking and 37202 37256 54 County Technical Grove analysis of techniques Areas and return 9/6/00 Extension office to South T eaching/S peaking and 37278 37355 77 County Teaching Grove, analysis of techniques Northwest groves and Southwest gro ve and return 9-7 -00 Extension office to Cassens Provide demonstration and 37481 37525 44 groves in West county and technical analysis of crop return 9-12-00 Extension office to Fort Speak to club about Citrus 37589 37599 10 Pierce Kiwanis and return Best Management Practices 9-13-00 Extension o ffi c e to Participate ill School 37612 37622 10 Lawnwood Elementary and Improvement Committee for return Elementary education 9-14-00 Extension office to Alpat Conduct Worker Protection 37644 37758 115 Groves in South county standards class for workers and Evans groves in west county and return 9-15-00 Extension office to Egan Conduct Worker Protection 37767 37856 89 Citrus, Blue Goose groves standards class for workers .- and return ',", -' Extension office to Becker Conduct Worker Protection 37950 38000 50 9-19-00 Groves in North county standards class for workers and return and make BMP evaluation 5 .. ,.,... ~8048 9-20-00 Extension office to Pride Conduct Worker Protection 38102 54 Groves in North county standards class for workers and return 9-21-00 Extension office to Minton Conduct Health and Safety 38021 38211 54 Grove, then to Radisson seminar for workers, then Inn on North Hutchinson host Citrus Seíninar planning Island and return committee kick-off meeting 9-25-00 Extension office to Conduct Best Management 38259 38206 53 McArthur groves In Practices training and southwest county and evaluation return 9-25-00 Extension office to Cassens Conduct analysis of ftuit size 38383 38429 46 groves in western county and quality and return 9-27-00 Extension office to Evans Conduct analysis on drainage 38486 38558 72 properties and return and irrigation, and troubleshoot for grove plotting 9-28-00 Home to Ft. Pierce Farm attend after-hours annual 38613 38566 47 Bureau and return meeting 9-29-00 Extension office to Indian attend Water Management 38576 38605 39 River Community College District meeting and St. Lucie West campus and participate in discussion of return Best Management Practices TOTAL 760 'C-.. 6 ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY ..."., COOPERATIVE EXTENSION MILEAGE LOG: MONTH OF _September 2000 . I certify that the mileage listed below was incurred in the perfonnance of my official duties. Signed ~~ 1ðJ:f ý Approved: . % ' Signature c Miles: 812 Date: 10/02/00 Agriculture Debbie McNeill Name of Em Jloyee (typed) Department Date Destination Purpose Odometer at Odometer Total Departure on Return Miles 09/01/00 Office to Morningside & Deliver program materials 102250 202313 63 Lawnwood Elem. then return to office 09/05/00 Office to Riversedge & S1. Conduct programs for 10 102395 102438 43 Lucie Elem then return to classes office 09/06/00 Office to Riversedge & Conduct programs for 8 102445 102500 55 Windmill Point then return classes to office 09/07/00 Office to Lakewood Park Conduct programs to 4 102513 102555 22 Elem then return to office classes 09/08/00 Office to Riversedge & Conduct programs to 8 102542 102597 55 Windmill Point then return classes to office 09/11/00 Office to St. Lucie Elem & Conduct programs to 8 102684 102747 63 FK Sweet then return to classes office 09/12/00 Office to FK Sweet & Conduct programs to 10 102752 102794 42 Riversedge then return to classes office 09/13/00 Office to Weatherbee Elem Conduct programs to 9 102806 102845 39 .' & FK Sweet then return to classes office 09/14/00 Office to Riversedge Elem Conduct programs to 10 102852 102895 43 & S1. Lucie Elem then classes 1 , return to office ~ ...., 09/20/00 Office to St. Lucie Elem & Conduct programs to 6 102973 103025 52 Windmill Point then return classes to office 09/22/00 Office to Windmill Point Delivered prqgram materials 103052 103096 44 and return to office 09/25/00 Office to Garden City Conduct programs to 4 103144 103216 72 EIem, St. Lucie EIem, & classes and deliver program Mariposa Elem then return materials to office 09/26/00 Office to F airlaen EIem & Conduct programs to 4 103221 103282 61 Mariposa Elem then return classes and deliver program to office materials 09/27/00 Office to Riversedge Elem Conduct programs to 6 103290 103339 49 & S Hutchinson Island then classes and conduct seining return to office program 09/28/00 Office to Port St Lucie Deliver program materials 103357 103405 48 Elem & Mariposa EIem then return to Office 09/29/00 Office to Fairlawn Elem & Conduct programs to 4 103412 103473 61 Mariposa Elem then return classes and deliver program to office materials TOTAL 812 ..... 2 "-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY ....,¡ COOPERATIVE EXTENSION MLEAGELOG: MONTH OF September 2000 I certify that the mileage listed below was incurred in the performance of my official duties. S~d:~ ,7l Approved: /'0" h 17 /-----, C>t / Signature i Total Miles: 75 < /ù /Î '//JT- Date: R. LeRoy Creswell Name of Employee (typed) Agriculture Department Date Destination Purpose Odometer at Odometer Total Departure on Return Miles 01 St. Lucie County Planning for SMS-St. Lucie 26773 26803 30 Extensio n - S mithso nian County Ecosystem exhibit Marine Institute- Harbo r (M. Rice); Library resources Branch and retro 02 Home-So. Hutchinson Gather information; client 26821 26867 46 Island- House of Refuge- meeting; photography Home 04 St. L uc ie County Visit S. Richardson about 26885 26937 52 Extension-Dan McCarty aquaponics class; Planning School-Smithsonian Marine for SMS-St. Lucie County Institute-North Hutchinson Ecosystem exhibit (M. Rice); Island-return photography of mangroves and beaches 05 St. Lucie County Extension Visit holding facilities at FPL 26953 26991 38 - FPL- return for Smithsonian specimens 06 St. Lucie County Discuss species inventories 27009 27039 30 Extension-Smithsonain- for SMS Ecosystem exhibit Harbor Branch-return 07 St. L uc ie County Visit aquaria exhibit, pick-up 27059 27101 42 Extension-FOS-return printed materials 08 St. Lucie County Pick-up materials; deliver 27116 27136 20 Extension-Harbor Branch- computer disk for .' return presentation 09 Sept Indiatlantic (home to IR Attend Indian River Lagoon 27148 27261 26 county border) Conference 1 .. - ~7311 11 Sept St. Lucie County Review species inventory; 27341 30 Extension- Smitsonian- gather library information Harbor Branch-return 12 Sept St. L.ucie County Visit bait shops, take 27359 27403 44 Extension-So. Hutchinson pictures of causeway and Island, Indian River Drive- docks, recreational boating Jensen Bch. Cswy. -return 13 Sept St. Lucie County Prepare for FAEP tour 27425 27445 20 Extension-Harbor Branch- return 13 Sept St. Lucie County Pickup supplies 27445 27459 14 Extension-Staples-return 14 Sept St. Lucie County Drop off materials at 27477 27497 20 ExtensiQn-Harbortown Harbortown; meet with Marina- Harbor Branch- visiting scientist at HBOI return 15 Sept St. Lucie County Aquaponics consultation, 27513 27549 36 Extension- Dan McCarty- conference call with S mi thso nian-Harbor Smithsonian Ecosystem Branch-return Exhibit; pickup materials and library (HBOI) 20 Sept SLC Landfill and return Provide educational materials 27565 27587 22 to 1. Burgess, SLC Recycling Center 20 Sept St. Lucie County Pick up educational resource 27587 27607 20 Extension-Harbor Branch- materials; meeting with B. return Dendrell - queen conch aquaculture permitting 21 Sept St. Lucie County Take photographs for 27625 27661 36 Extension-Jack Island-No. presentations on mangroves Hutchinson Island-return and beaches 22 Sept St. Lucie County Introduction; visit; take 27677 27719 42 Extension-Sailfish Marina- photographs So. Hutchinson Island- return 25 Sept St. Lucie County Conference call with 27822 27840 18 .' E xt ensio n - Smi thso nian- Smithsonian, Washington return D.C. regarding exhibit 25 Sept St. Lucie County Extension Arrange for guided tour of 27840 27868 28 - FMEL-return mangroves 2 26 Sept S1. Lucie C~nty Master Gardeners program '-'27884 27912 28 Extension-FMEL-return 26 Sept St. Lucie County Pick up computer disks 27912 27926 14 Extensio1;l-Staples-return 27 Sept St. Lucie County Pick up materials for Sea 27942 27972 30 Extension-Smithsonian- Grant meeting in Orlando Harbor Branch-return 27 Sept S1. Lucie County Drop off order for certificate 27972 27986 14 Extension-Jenkins Plaques- folders return 29 Sept S1. Lucie County Smithsonian exhibit meeting 30825 30843 18 Extension-Smithsonian- return 29 Sept St. Lucie County Pickup materials; 30843 30863 20 Extension-Harbor Branch- aquaculture consultation return TOTAL 738 C-.. 3 · ..6 '-'" ST. LUCIE COUNTY COOPERATIVE EXTENSION ....." MILEAGE LOG: MONTH OF September 2000 I certify that the mileage listed below was incurred in the performance of my official duties. Approved: Total Miles: 668 Date: October 2.2000 Diane Franzen N fE 1 Agriculture ameo mp oyee typel epartment Date Destination Purpose Odometer at Odometer Total Departure on Return Miles 9/01/00 Extension Office to Jensen Look at new technology and 20933 20989 56 Beach, Home Depot, Barnes pick up ordered book on Green & Noble and return to Construction Methods. Extension Office. 9/5/00 Extension Office to the Present nutrition related 21125 21169 44 Restoration House, WPSL program, met with House staff Radio and home. and presented radio show (recorded). 9/6/00 Extension Office to South Look at new and current home 21189 21255 66 Hutchinson Island and Power construction . Plant then south to Stuart, and home. 9/7/00 Extension Office to Indian To bookstore in Vero to order 21276 21344 68 River County and North St. Nutrition Supplement Book and Lucie County and home. to see construction on island and see retention pond handling and older home remodeling. 9/8/00 Extension o ffi c e to This agent was arrangements 21362 21411 49 Hutchinson Island Marriat chair for statewide meeting. Hotel, Statewide meeting site Met with event management and home. team for fmal arrangements. 9/18/00 From home to Publix Sabal Purchase groceries for program 21464· 21492 28 Palm Plaza and Lowe's then and search Lowe's for new on to Extension Office. building materials. ( d) D ..... 1 9/19/00 Extension ~ Present nutrition related '-'21529 21601 72 OffIce to Restoration House, Housing programs, planned programs Authority and Means Court with Housing Authority Staff and return to office. and discussed revising video on Hurricane House. . PM - Extension Office to Bayshore Avenue PM - Visit with tradesman Subcontractors office and about product exhibit and home. advisory committee plans. 9/20/00 Extension Office to New Attended Council of Social 21619 21657 38 Horizons, Post Office then to Agencies meeting, mailed Extension Office. packages for office purposes. - 9/21/00 Extension Office to Gatlin To search for Blue Maxx. show 21672 21732 60 Road area in South St. Lucie house and discuss building County and return technique detail. 9/25/00 Extension Office to County Accompanied clients to County 21791 21843 52 Administration Building, then planning department to talk to Jensen Beach Lowe's and with building inspectors about return to Extension Office. new technology and then to search for exhibit materials. 9/26/00 Extension Office to Winding To meet with polysteel 21860 21904 44 Lane development, off of25tb contractors to see new Street, to distributors office construction and take pictures on Biltmore and home. for program. Discuss building detail. 9/28/00 Extension Office to Manatee Deliver school enrichment 21934 21991 57 Elementary and Morningside program material and meet with Elementary and returned to teachers. Extension Office. 9/29/00 Extension Office to Fort To research and order program 22005 22039 34 Pierce Library, Office materials. Look at and Supplies Co. and returned to purchase supplies. Extension Office. TOTAL 668 ...... 2 '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY "wi COOPERATIVE EXTENSION MILEAGE LOG: MONTH OF _September 2000 I certifY that the mile~ belo (;din the performance of my official duties. Signed: Total Miles: hh1 Approved: Date: Nowmhf'r 17 ?OOO , \ ( Signature Kenneth T. Gioeli Name of Employee (typed) Agriculture Department Date Destination Purpose Odometer at Odometer Total Departure on Return Miles 9/1/00 Office ' to Pesticide assist with container 35167 35189 22 Container Recycling facility recycling, - client missed at landfill and return appointment and rescheduled for later in the day 9-1-00 Office to Pesticide customer contacted returned 35189 35210 21 Container Recycling facility to assist with container at landfill and return recylcing 9-1-00 Office to Savannah State Melaleuca biocontro 1 35210 35268 58 Preserve and Blind Creek program and monitor dune beach and return restoration program 9-2-00 Office to St. Lucie West Library research for program 35367 35414 47 library to condos near PSL development and vertebrate hospital and return pest assistance at condo 9-5-00 Office to Indian River Master Gardener ecology 35712 35730 18 County line and return training at FL Medical Entomology Lab 9-6-00 Office to Jensen Beach Ace purchase demonstration 35798 35842 44 Hardware and return equipment 9- 7 -00 Office to Prima Vista and drop off promotional 35913 . 35956 43 Morningside libraries and literature and scout seminar return teaching facilities for Living ~ , in Coastal Florida 9-8-00 Office to Downtown Ft. drop off promotional 36007 36051 44 Pierce Library and literature and scout seminar Lakewood Park Library teaching facilities for Living and return in Coastal Florida 3 .... -- '-'36194 9-11-00 Office to Midway Road drop off bulk mail and 36243 49 Post Office to canal off photographed aquatic plants western Port St. Lucie for powerpoint presentation Blvd. and return 9-12-00 Office to Martin County attend Natural Resources 36292 36336 44 line and return Agent meetmg at Martin Extension office 9-18-00 Office to Header Canal survey status 0 f tarantula 36981 37006 25 Grove and return colony established in grove 9-19-00 Office to USDA lab and conduct wildlife seminar 37052 37054 2 return 9-20-00 Office to St. Lucie West Preliminary enviro nmental 37162 37209 47 library to Ballantrae (near survey for Ballantrae and Club Med) and return conducted techno 10 gy research for GACAA Conference 9-21-00 Office to Heathcote to Checked on availability fo 37279 37317 38 Means Court Center and "toad abodes" at Heathcote return for Master Gardener wildlife course and plan for upcoming taping oft.v. show 9-22-00 Office to Port St. Lucie Determined why pest control 37396 37442 46 building on Hillrnore Drive methods were ineffective at a and then to LESCO and building on Hillrnore Drive in return PSL and checked on availability and prices of herbicides 9-26-00 Office to Wal-mart to Purchased insect repellant 37802 37838 36 Indian River County line and conducted segment of and return Master Gardener training at Med. Entomology lab 9-27-00 Office to WPSL and return record radio show 37887 37928 41 9-29-00 Office to Port St. Lucie K- Purchased props for internet 38241 38277 36 Mart to Means Court WebCT bat course and Center and return conducted a preproduction meeting ~.. TOTAL 661 4 ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY ....., COOPERATIVE EXTENSION MILEAGE LOG: MONTH OF October 2000 I certify that the mileage listed below was incurred in the performance of my official duties. Signed: Total Miles: (,,77 Approved: Date: NC\Vf'mhPr 17 ?OOO , Agriculture ameo mp oyee type epartment Date Destination Purpose Odometer at Odometer Total Departure on Return Miles 10-2-00 Extension office to presentation ofJunior Master 64830 64850 20 Southern Oaks Middle Gardener pro gram to staff Schoo 1 and return 10-4-00 Extension office to planning for Junior Master 64870 64890 20 Southern Oaks Middle Gardener program Schoo 1 and return 10-5-00 Extension office to St. homeowner consultation 64900 64933 33 Lucie West and return 10-6-00 Extension office to St. participate in field trip 64945 64960 15 Lucie County Public Works 10-10-00 Extension office to Master Gardener vegetable 65010 65030 20 Southern Oaks Middle garden program School and return 9-10-00 Extension office to conduct seminar 65030 65062 32 Tropical Isles and return 10-12-00 Extension office to planning for Junior Master 65073 65093 20 Southern Oaks Middle Gardener program Schoo 1 and return 10-13-00 Extension office to St. planning for Junior Master 65114 65132 18 Lucie Elementary and Gardener program return 10-16-00 Extension office to horse pick up manure for gardens 65172 65212 40 \"" . ranch on Orange Avenue at St. Lucie Elementary Extension, S1. Lucie Elementary and return N D 1 .. - '-'65250 10-18-00 Extension office to Port St. planning for Junior Master 65283 33 Lucie Elementary and Gardener program return 10-19-00 Extension. office to horse pick up manure for gardens 65290 65345 55 ranch on Orange Avenue at Port St. Lucie Elementary Extension, Port St. Lucie Elementary and return 10-20-00 Extension office to St. homeowner consultation 65356 65391 35 Lucie West and return 10-23-00 Extension office to planning for Junior Master 65446 65496 50 Southern Oaks Middle Gardener program, then School, St. Lucie West and meet with Lake Charles return HOA members 10-24-00 Extension office to Martin assist in conducting multi- 65516 65561 45 County Extension office county Master Gardener and return training segment 10-25-00 Extension office to conduct homeowner seminar 65581 65604 23 Hutchinson Island and return 10-26-00 Extension office to Indian participate in Job Search 65621 65664 43 River Community College, semmar, and work with Port St. Lucie Elementary Junior Master Gardener and St. Lucie Elementary program and return 10-27-00 Extension office to Martin pick up materials to present 65690 65723 33 County Fairgrounds, commercial seminar series at LESCO and return LESCO 10-28-00 Extension office to help Master Gardeners set up 65740 65783 43 Downtown Farmers at the Market and participate Market, North Beach and at Party in the Park then help back to Market M.G.'s break down booth 10-30-00 Extension office to work with teachers for 65838 65901 63 Southern Oaks Middle Junior Master Gardener School, St. Lucie program Elementary, Port St. Lucie Elementary and return 0--31-00 Extension office to planning for Junior Master 65923 65959 36 Mariposa Elementary and Gardener program return TOTAL 677 2 ~ AGENDA REOUEST .~ ITEM NO. C-9 DATE: December 19, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Administration Doug Anderson County Administrator SUBJECT: Committee Appointments BACKGROUND: Commissioner Bruhn wishes to appoint Russell L. Aikens to the Planning and Zoning Commission and Stix Nixon to the Board of Adjustment. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/ A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board ratify Commissioner Bruhn's appointment of Russell L. Aikens to the Planning and Zoning Commission and Stix Nixon to the Board of Adjustment. , [x] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Also Appointed: Jody Rosier Historical Corom. (Bruhn) Michael Bausher Library Advisory (At Large) COMMISSION ACTION: Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing: County Attorney: originating Dept. Other: Other: Eff. 5/96 Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) ¡; '-' .., DECEMBER 19,2000 7:00 PM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA lTEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will 'discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARlNGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 AM., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 AM. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA lTEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBUC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 AM., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-' '...I ;; www.stlucieco.gov John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA December 19, 2000 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held December 12, 2000. 2. PROCLAMATION/PRESENTATION /' A. Resolution No. 00-286 - Proclaiming the week of December 19, 2000V through December 26, 2000 as "Audubon Bird Count Week" in St. Lucie County, Florida. ./ B. Agriculture / Christmas Remembrance - Sue Munyan and the 4H Group will V / be here to present gifts to the Board of County Commissioners. .. / c. Jerome Rhyant of the Love Center Regeneration Ministries, Inc. will address V the Board to request funding. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA / PUBLIC HEARINGS PUBLIC WORKS I J 5' ~eSOIUtiOn No: 00-004 / South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration SpeCial'- L7 Ässessment DIstnct - ConsIder staff recommendatIOn to adopt the resolution stating the County's intent to use the uniform method of collecting non-ad valorem special assessments for the South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration Special Assessment District. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any p'erson who decides to app.eal any action taken by the Board at tl'iese meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpos~ ma'i n~eÇl to ensur~ tþat a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the reç¡uest of any party to the proceedlpgs. individuals te.stlfylng during a hearing will be sworn in.. Any party to the proceedmg~ wIll b~ gr.a)1ted th~ 9pportumty to cross-examine any indivlaual testi¡ying during a hearing upon request. Anyone wIth a dlsaolhty. re~umng, accommodatIon to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462:]777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-' ..." REGULAR AGENDA DECEMBER 19,2000 PAGE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED) Je. '" vb· Resolution No. 00-28S / Briargate MSBU / 2nd Public Hearing - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the Briargate MSBU, approve the preliminary assessment roll, and authorize the County Engineer to proceed with construction of the project. Resolution No. 00-284 / Rouse Road MSBU / 2nd Public Hearing - Consider staff recommendation to consider the comments of the property owners before adopting the resolution to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the Rouse Road MSBU approving the assessment roll, and to authorize the County Engineer to proceed with construction of the project. Resolution No. 00-275 / South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration MSBU - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution stating the County's intent to use the uniform method of collecting non-ad valorem special assessments for the South Hutchinson Island Beach Restoration MSBU. End of Public Hearings ,./"- 6. \~ COUNTY ATTORNEY il),' ~ Resolution No. 00-257 / Resolution No. 00-258 - Consider staff / V recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 00-2S7 repealing Resolution No. \ ~ 73-137 as amended and abolishing the Board of GoveI:nors, and adopt l Resolution No. 00-2S8 creating the Technology Committee, and providing .for duties and functions of the committee. . / Pursuit Boats (S2 Yachts) Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement -{'/ /. Consider staff recommendation to approve the Job Growth Investment! Grant Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. i ....., ...., REGULAR AGENDA DECEMBER 19,2000 PAGE THREE /~ ATIORNEY (CONTINUED) C. Mirabella Yachts Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement. 7. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Resolution No. 00-139/ Ouasi-Tudicial / Crimson North Group limited - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting Major Site Plan and Preliminary Plat Approval for the 10-10t residential subdivision project to be known as Anacostia SID. Location: East side of South SR AlA, approximately 1,300 feet south of the entrance of Frederick Douglas Park. This item has been re- agendaed from December 12, 2000. 8. ADMINISTRATION Commissioner Hutchinson would like to discuss alternating trips to Tallahassee during the Legislative Session. W' ..",¡ CONSENT AGENDA December 19. 2000 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 11 2. PUBLIC WORKS A. River Park Water Quality Improvement Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Engineering Work Authorization for BCI Engineers & Scientists, Inc. to design baffle boxes to improve the quality of stormwater runoff discharging from the River Park subdivision in the amount of $26,270.40, approve the project budget, and authorize the Chairman to execute the contract. B. King Orange 2 MSBU and Skylark 2 MSBU - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Interlocal Agreements with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and the City of Fort Pierce to provide potable water to King Orange Drive and Skylark Drive, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreements. C. King Orange 2 MSBU and Skylark 2 MSBU - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Interlocal Agreements with the Property Appraiser and Tax Collector, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreements. D. Road & Bridge / Sod Contracts - Consider staff recommendation to approve the contract amendments as prepared by the County Attorney with Jose A. Gonzales d.b.a. T&J Sod Transport & Installation, Nature's Keeper, Inc., and Tri-Brother's Tree & Landscaping, Inc., to increase the contract from $9,999 to $2 S,OOO for each sod installation contract, and authorize the Chairman to sign the amendments. E. Work Authorization No.9 / Orange Avenue over Header Canal Bridge Replacement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the work authorization with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for engineering services to provide requested revisions in the amount of $10,800, and authorize the Chairman to sign the authorization. F. Work Authorization No. 10/ S3rd Street Bridge over Canal C-2S - Consider staff recommendation to approve the work authorization for the scope and fee proposal submitted by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. for engineering services to provide plans and specifications in the amount of $13,800 and authorize the Chairman to sign the authorization. G. Road & Bridge / Equipment Purchase - Consider staff recommendation to approve Equipment Request No. EQOl-223 for the purchase of a Raised Pavement Marker (RPM) Applicator from S. T.E. Inc., in the amount of $ 3, 79 S, for use in the Traffic Operations Section. '-' ...", CONSENT AGENDA DECEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE TWO 3. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Permission to Advertise / Petition to Abandon / Dixieland SjD Unrecorded Plat - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise a Public Hearing to be held on January 16, 2001 at 9:00 am, or as soon thereafter as possible. B. Revocable License Agreement / Cherokee Street - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Revocable License Agreement, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and instruct Ranger Construction Industries, Inc. to record the Agreement in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. C. Agreement Extension - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Second Extension Agreement with R&R Corporate Systems, Inc. for Janitorial Services, and authorize the Chairman to sign the extension. D. Resolution No. 00-288 / Rouse Road MSBU - Hendren Right-of-Way Parcel- Consider staff recommendation to accept the Hendren Deed, authorize the Chairman to execute Resolution No. 00-288, and direct staff to record the documents in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 4. PURCHASING A. Bid Waiver and Sole Source Purchase - Consider staff recommendation to approve the request for a bid waiver and sole source purchase to RAD Data Communications for a Optimux-XLTIMultiplexer in the amount of $13,800. B. Bid No. 00-084 - Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for the purchase of two integrated tool carrier loaders to the low bidder, Coastline Equipment Co. in the amount of $197,720. S. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. MPO's Transit Development Plan Consultant Services Contract - Consider staff recommendation to approve the request to advertise the Request for Proposals for the Transit Development Plan. B. Permission to Advertise - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise an RFP for the FFY 2001 Community Development Grant applications for Grant Planning and Writing and/or Grant Administration in the Economic Development category. C. AAA Cooper Replat - Consider staff recommendation to approve the final plat for the subdivision to be known as AAA Cooper - Replat, and authorize staff to proceed with its final processing. '-" ...., CONSENT AGENDA DECEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE THREE S. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (CONTINUED) D. Oleander Pines Replat - Consider staff recommendation to approve the final plat for the subdivision to be know as Oleander Pines - Replat, and authorize staff to proceed with its final processing. E. Yorkridge Plat - Consider staff recommendation to approve the final plat for the subdivision to be known as Yorkridge Plat, and authorize staff to proceed with its final processing. 6. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE A. Bid Waiver and Award from Quotations - Consider 'staff recommendation to approve the bid waiver, and award from quotations to Ramey Rug Carpet One in the amount of $16,287.31 for replacement carpet for the Mets Locker Room & Office/Weight Room, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. B. Bid No. 01-004/ South 2 Sth Street Bridge over Ten-Mile Creek Bridge Repair- Consider staff recommendation to award the bid to the second lowest bidder, CEM Enterprise, Inc. in the amount of $97,302, establish the project budget, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. C. Change Order No.1 / Orange Avenue at C-24 Bridge Replacement - Consider staffrecommendation to approve the change order in the deductive amount of (-$40,S18.02) resulting in a total contract amount of $1,038,406.98, accept the project, release retainage in the amount of $107,892.S0, and make final payment to Johnson-Davis, Inc. in the amount of $67,179.48. D. Keen Road Bridge Replacement Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the award of an additional $lS,OOO for geotechnical engineering testing services and construction management services to Dunkelberger Engineering & Testing to complete the project. 7. LEISURE SERVICES Ilous Ellis Memorial Park (Open Space) Baseball Lighting - Consider staff recommendation to piggy-back off of the City of Jacksonville's Contract No. SC- 0463-00 with Musco Lighting for the needed improvements, and authorize the Chairwoman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. 8. AGRICULTURE Mileage Reimbursement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the establishment of a set mileage reimbursement for the Extension Director at $300/month, and Agents, the Horticulture Specialist and one Program Assistant at $225/month, to be paid on a monthly basis effective January 1,2001. '-' ...., CONSENT AGENDA DECEMBER 19, 2000 PAGE FOUR 9. ADMINISTRATION Committee Appointments - Consider staff recommendation to ratify Commissioner Bruhn's appointments of Russell Aikens to serve on the Planning & Zoning Commission, and Stix Nixon to serve on the Board of Adjustment.