Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 01-05-99 - . '-' ....".I www.stlucieco.gov John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA January 5, 1999 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held December 22, 1998 and the special meeting held December 15, 1998. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 3. CONSENT AGENDA PUBLIC HEARINGS COM~TYDEVELOPMENT 4A. Resolution No. 99-OO2IDV A-94-OO1/ Florida Coast Investors, Ltd./Ouasi-Judicial- This is the second of two required public hearings. Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution rescinding the approvals granted under DV A-94-001. 4B. ORDINANCE No. 99-001- This is the first of two required public hearings. Consider staff recommendation to approve the ordinance which proposes general amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The second public hearing will be held on January 19, 1999 at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. j, 5 ADMINISTRATION A. Avenue D Funding- The Board is asked to provide direction regarding the City of Ft. Pierce's request for additional funding in the amount of $572,430. B. District Medical Examiner- The Board is asked to make a recommendation on the re- appointment of the District 19 Medical F.nminer and/or to make other recommendations for Medical Examiner. NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings wiD need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a heåring will be swom in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. -- . '-" ....., CONSENT AGENDA January 5. 1999 1. WARRANTS LIST /;.-~_.~ Approve warrants list No. 13 and/14. 2. PERMISSION TO ADVERTISEIRECOMMENDED FOR A NIGHT MEETING Community Development- Consider staff request for permission to advertise the following public hearings for January 19, 1999 at 7 PM or as soon thereafter as possible: -Ernest Bodine, for a change in zoning from RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 dulacre) zoning to AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 dulacre) zoning. Location: South side of Tilton Road, approximately 1,600 feet West of Silver Oaks Drive. -Fort Pierce Air Center-Hangar 4 for a Major Adjustment to an existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport to add 3,360 square feet of office space. Location: 2982 Aviation Way, St. Lucie County International Airport - Hangar 4 -Ordinance 99-001 (second public hearing), which proposes general amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 3. COUNTY ATTORNEY Healthy Kids- Consider staff recommendation to approve the second amendment to the lease agreement with Healthy Kids of St. Lucie County and authorize the Chairman to sign the amendment. . 4. PUBLIC WORKS Plat Approval- Consider staff recommendation to approve the Plat for parcels 6 and 7 of The Preserve at Savanna Club and authorize the Chairman to execute the documents. 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Resolution No. 99-003- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting Major Site Plan approval for the project to be known as International Alzheimer's Foundation Trust on 4.96 acres of property located on the south side of West Midway Road, approximately 700 feet east of Dunn. p B. Letter of Support- Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chair to sign the attached letter in support of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council application for designation as an Economic Development District and to transmit to the U.S. Department of Commerce. '-' .""., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADDITIONS AGENDA .JANUARY 5, 1999 REGULAR AGENDA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A.I Resolution No. 99-005- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution authorizing the use of the County's Job Growth Incentive Fund to facilitate the development of the proposed QVC Telephone Call Center. -"::.- ," ......,"!..-::"~~:~ '-' -...J ~ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: December 22, 1998 Tape: 1 Convened: 9:00 a.m. Adjourned: 10:20 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Paula A. Lewis, John D. Bruhn, Cliff Barnes, Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator; Phil Freeland, Asst. County Adplinistrator; Dan McIntyre, County Attorney; Ray Wamy, Community Development Director; Bill Blazak, Utilities Director; Harvey Lincoln, M & B Manager; Don Cole ,Acquisitions Manager; Charlie Bicht, Purchasing Manager; Leo Cordeiro, Solid Waste Manager; Nick Dragash, Central Services Manager; Deputy Nickel; A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES 1-032) It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the minutes of the meeting held December 15, 1998; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS Ms. Jean Hearn, Tozier Rd. resident, addressed the Board on item 4-A Taylor Creek and requested the Board consider postponing this project until proper permitting has taken place. Mr. Bob Bangert, area resident, addressed the Board in favor of the County Administrator's suggestion to abandon the project. He also addressed the "fish kill" presently taking place in the county and also funds for Harbor Pointe. 3. CONSENT AGENDA (1-201) It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the Consent Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. Warrant List. The Board approved Warrant List No. 12 2. PURCHASING A. Permission to advertise- The Board approved advertising for bids for the purchase of vehicles and light trucks. B. Bid Waiver- The Board approved waiving the formal bid process and declaring a sole source for Southern Security Services for the replacement of the fire alarm system in parts of the Rock Road Detention Center. C. Bid Waiver- The Board approved waiving the formal bid process and declared a sole source for purchase of asphalt millings from Dickerson Florida. \w' ...." .. D. Pennission to advertise- The Board approved advertising for the following bids for the Landfill: Construction of protective walls Disposal of Scrap Metal E. Property Record Removal- The Board approved the removal of various items from the Boards fixed asset inventory as listed. F. Pennission to advertise- The Board approved advertising a Request for Proposal for Guaranteed Energy Savings Contract (Perfonnance Contract). 3. CENTRAL SERVICES " Administration Complex Lift Station- The Board approved funding in the amount of $26,000 to proceed with the rebuilding of the Administration Complex Lift Station. 4. PERMISSION TO ADVERTISE/RECOMMENDED FOR A NIGHT MEETING Community Development- The Board approved advertising the following public hearings for"January 5, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible: FLORIDA COAST INVESTORS, LTD., to review the existing Development Agreement (DV A-94-001) to consider the involuntary tennination of this Development Agreement due to the failure of Florida Coast Investors, Ltd., to commence the construction of certain site related roadway improvements as required (second public hearing). ORDINANCE 99-001, which proposed general amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code (first public hearing). 5. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Property Acquisition- The Board approved authorizing staff to initiate Tax Deed Application for all County owned Tax Certificates as identified and authorized the chainnan to execute the application.J B. Employee Insurance Plan- The Board approved the agreement with McCreary Corporation for administration of this program, and authorized the chainnan to execute the agreement. C. South 25th St. Road Widening- The Board approved the payment of $2,246.54 to Andrew Morris Jr., as full compensation for purchase of a pennanent slope, public sidewalk, drainage and utility easement with the understanding he will connect to Port St. Lucie Utility system at his cost. D. Indrio North Savannas Project- The Board approved the option agreements for Parcels 156 and 157 and authorized the Chainnan to execute the agreements. E. YMCA of St. Lucie County- The Board approved the agreement with the YMCA of St. Lucie County, Inc., and authorized the Chairman to execute the agreement upon receipt of the signed originals from the YMCA. 6. LEISURE SERVICES A. Equipment Request No. 99-67- The Board approved the equipment request for the purchase of a two wheel drive tractor for the Parks Division. '- "" B. Children's Environmental Learning Museum- The Board approved submitting a grant application for the DEP in the amount of $500,000 and also approved procurement of the services of Dr. Charles Kibert to perform a value engineering study on the Museum. Com. Barnes stated his opposition the architect's cost. 7. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Casa Mae Fanns- The Board approved the final execution ofthe Minor Plat for this subdivision. REGULAR AGENDA 4. ADMINISTRATION (1-477) A. Taylor Creek- Staff requested direction concerning the permit exemption for maintenance dredging and not proceeding with the administrative hearing and on reallocation of funds if the permit exemption is abandoned. Co~. Barnes stated he was in favor of opening Harbor Pointe, however, $200,000 will not be enough to do all that is necessary for the public to be able to utilize the area. He stated that the "Muck" removal was a top priority. He also suggested having a workshop scheduled, however, he was not in favor of giving up the exemption. Com. Coward questioned the cost of the administrative hearing process. The Consultant advised Com. Coward it would be in the range of $30-40,000.00 and addressed the Board's questions on the Corps of Engineers involvement. He advised the Board that the engineering cost would be in the area of $70,000 and DEP permitting would cost approximately $100,000. Com. Barnes stated they needed more publrc participation and the public also needed to be more educated on this project since this is not the project litigants filed suit on. Com. Coward concurred with having the workshop before any decisions are made. The Consultant stated he felt there would not be a problem with going back to the hearing officer to extend the hearing after the 5th of January. The County Attorney suggested contacting the attorney for the petitioner and ask if they would be inclined to consider a further extension and report back to the Board. Com. Bruhn stated this should be done in conjunction with opening Harbor Pointe and have all the information and costs available at the workshop. Com. Coward requested staff look further into the SFWMD incurring more of the cost for this multiple dredging project. He also stated his concern with the hazardous materials which have been discussed in the past, i.e. DDT or PCP levels. This survey was done in the 1970's, however, recent studies show this is not a problem. However, his contention is that these hazardous materials may be lower pass the muck. Mr. Patel, BCI Engineers and Scientists stated in their testing of Crane Creek, they went as far down as the hard bottom. ,"" '-" 'wi Mr. Patel continued to explain exactly where and how far down they collected the samples. He also stated it is possible there may be some DDT in certain portions ofthe creek, however, he asked the Board keep in mind that they have over 25 acres to look at creek sampling points and the cost may exceed $100,000. Cvffi. Lewis concurred with scheduling a workshop since the project keeps changing. Com. Coward suggested activating the Seaport Advisory Committee. Mr. Bob Bangert, area resident advised the Board they have requested a public workshop for some time. It was the consensus of the Board to schedule a workshop. B. Library Advisory Board- The Board was asked to fill one at-large vacancy on this Board. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to nominate Mr. Rosenthal as an at- large member of the Library Advisory Board; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. C. Employee Handbook- Consider staff recommendation to approve the new St. Lucie County Employee Handbook. It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve the Employee Handbook; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. Additions A-I UTILITIES Operations Contract- Consider staff recommendation to approve the contract with Avatar Utility Services and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract subject to approval and form by the County Attorney. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. BOARD COMMENTS Com. Barnes stated he was in favor of activating the Seaport Advisory Committee and directed the County Administrator to contact the members. He also requested staff obtain commitments from those groups who have also expressed their concerns with the project. Com. Barnes questioned public access to fields in the schools in White City. Mr. Keogh, Leisure Services, addressed Com. Barnes' question and advised the Board that the public does have access to the fields at certain times. . Com. Barnes requested the community residents be made aware of the accessibility. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 10:20 a.m. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court '-'" 'wi BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA SPECIAL MEETING Date: December 15, 1998 Tape: 1 Convened: 2:00 p.m. Adjourned: 3:20 p.m. Commissioners Present: Chainnan, Paula A. Lewis, John D. Bruhn, Cliff Barnes; Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator; Bill B1azak, Utilities Director; Charlie Bicht, Purchasing Manager, Nick Dragash, Central Services Manager; Jim Lancaster, Asst. CoUnty Attorney; A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk UTILITIES RFP 98-73- Consider staff recommendation to approve Avatar Utility Services, Inc., as the successful respondent. Also approve their alternative staffing proposal and the proposed reduction in the annual charge for the environmental audit and direct staff to negotiate a contract with Avatar Utility Services. The Utility Director reviewed and recapped the meeting of October 13, 1998. Com. Bruhn questioned why the switch from Culligan to Avatar. The Utility Director addressed the problems encountered with Culligan after their first year of servIce. , Mr. Les Kemp, U.S. Filter (previously known as Culligan) representative addressed the Utility Director's comments. Mr. John Overton, Avatar representative, addressed the Board's questions. After discussion, it was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Bruhn; Aye's: Coward, Hutchinson, Barnes, Lewis; motion carried by a vote of 4 to 1. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court '-" "'-" AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. t/-A DATE: January 5, 1999 CONSENT REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg. [ ] Quasi-JD. [X ] SUBJECT: Midway Square Shopping Center (Florida Development Agreement (DVA-94-001). BACKGROUND: In September 1994, St. Lucie County and the developers of the proposed Midway Square Shopping Center, Florida Coast Investors, Ltd., entered into Development Agreement DVA-94-001. This Development Agreement vested the approved site plan for the proposed 235,237 square foot commercial shopping center at the northwest corner of West Midway Road and South 25th Street for a period of ten years. TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Community Development On March 24, 1998, this Board conducted its 3rd review of the required annual report for the Midway Square Development Agreement. At that meeting the Board reviewed the status of this project, with particular attention being given to the level of compliance with the requirements of paragraph nine (9), of DVA-94-001, which called for certain roadway construction improvements to be made along South 25th Street and West Midway Road. Following the Boards discussion on this matter, the Board directed that a public hearing be scheduled to consider either amending DVA-94-001 to address the developers requested changes to the Agreement, as submitted to the County on March 20, 1998, or to initiate the procedures to consider the formal revocation of this Development Agreement for failure to comply with the requirements of this Development Agreement. On July 21, 1998, this Board was scheduled to hold the first of the two required public hearings on the proposed amendments to the Development Agreement for this project. Prior to this public hearing, the Community Development Department received a written request to pull from the Boards agenda the review of these proposed amendments. At the July 21, 1998, the Board agreed to pull this item from further consideration. In late July, 1998, the developers of this project, Florida Coast Investors, Ltd., indicated to County Staff that it was their intention not to proceed with the either the platting of this property or the required Roadway Improvements to South 25th Street or West Midway. They acknowledged that this action would place them into a position of non-compliance with the terms of Development Agreement DVA-94-001. However, when asked, they indicated an unwillingness to submit a formal written request asking that the County commence the procedures to void this Development Agreement. After several other telephone conversations with the principals of Florida Coast Investors, Ltd., the developers again indicated that they did not wish to voluntarily notify the County of their desire to terminate this Development Agreement. Noting this, the County ------ .~ "" January 5/ 1999 Page 2 Agenda Item: L/. A Subject: Midway Square Development Agreement (DVA-94-001) has been left with no alternative but to initiate the procedures for the an involuntary termination of this Development Order. On December 15/ 1998/ this Board held a public hearing to review the status of Development Order 94-001 and to consider the involuntary cancellation of this Development Agreement. At that public hearing testimony was received from both the property owner and members of the general public as to the merits of maintaining or canceling Development Agreement DVA-94-001. At the conclusion of this public hearing/ the Board announced its intention to hold a second public hearing on this matter on January 5/ 1999/ @ 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board accept any additional public testimony on this matter and that at the conclusion of the second public hearing/approve draft Resolution 99-002/ rescinding the approvals granted under DVA-94-001. OTHER: [ ] DENIED Include an additional "whereas" clause referring to developer's request to withdraw their request. COMWISSION ACTION: [ ~ APPROVED Coordination/Siqnatures County Attorney: Mgt & Budget: Purchasing: Other: Other: Originating Dept: (AGEND404) Finance: (copies only) : '-'" 'wi ~~ COMMISSION REVIEW: January 5, 1999 Resolution No.: 99-002 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Ray Wazny, Community Development Director DATE: December 21, 1998 SUBJECT: Midway Square Shopping Center (Florida Coast Investors, Ltd., ) Development Agreement (DV A-94-001) In September 1994, St. Lucie County and the developers of the proposed Midway Square Shopping Center, Florida Coast Investors, Ltd., entered into Development Agreement DVA-94-001. This Development Agreement vested the approved site plan for the proposed 235,237 square foot commercial shopping center at the northwest corner of West Midway Road and South 25th Street for a period of ten years. Section 13 of that Development Agreement requires that the Board of County Commissioners hold an annual review of the Development Agreement and review the status of the developers compliance with its terms and conditions. On May 14, 1996, this Board held its first review of the status of this Developers Agreement. The second annual review of this agreement was held on February 25, 1997. At both reviews, the developers were found to be in compliance with the terms and conditions of the Agreement Section 9 of this Development Agreement requires the developers of this project to commence the construction of certain roadway improvements along the perimeter of this site no later than 36 months after the effective date of this Order. These improvements were to be completed no later than 45 months after the effective date of this Order, or prior to the first C of 0, whichever came first. Failure to comply with the requirements of this Section would not automatically terminate this Development Agreement, but would permit the County to initiate the procedures to revoke this Agreement. On January 28, 1998, the developers were notified of our receipt of their 4th Annual Road Impact Fee payment. At the same time, the developer was provided with the required 30 days notice of the County's intent to conduct the 1998 annual review of this project on March 3, 1998. At the request of the developers representatives, the review of this Development Agreement was continued from the March 3, 1998, Board meeting to the meeting of March 24, 1998 On March 24, 1998, this Board conducted a review of the required annual report for the Midway Square Development Agreement. At that meeting the Board reviewed the status of this project. Particular attention was given to the level of compliance with the requirements of paragraph nine (9), of DV A-94- 001, which called for certain roadway construction improvements to be made along South 25th Street and West Midway Road. Following the Boards discussion on this matter, the Board authorized a public hearing be scheduled to consider either amending DVA-94-001 to address the requested changes to the Agreement as submitted by the developer on March 20, 1998, or to initiate the procedures to consider the formal revocation of this Development Agreement for failure to comply with the requirements of this Development Agreement. ',--" '-' December 21, 1998 Page 2 Subject: Florida Coast Investors, Ltd. Development Agreement DV A-94-00 1 On July 21, 1998, this Board was scheduled to hold the first of the two required public hearings on the proposed amendments to the Development Agreement for this project. Prior to this public hearing, the Community Development Department received a written request to pull from the Boards agenda the review of these proposed amendments. At the July 21, 1998, the Board agreed to pull this item from further consideration. In late July, 1998, the developers ofthis project, Florida Coast Investors, Ltd., indicated to County Staff that it was their intention not to proceed with the development ofthis property at this time. This included their withdrawal of the construction plans for the required improvements to the intersection of South 25th Street and West Midway Road. They acknowledged that this action would place them into a position of non-compliance with the terms of Development Agreement DVA-94-001. However, they did not indicate a willingness to submit a formal written request asking that the County commence the procedures to void this Development Agreement. After several other telephone conversations with the principals of Florida Coast Investors, Ltd., the developers again indicated that they did not wish to voluntarily notify the County of their desire to terminate this development Agreement. Noting this, the County has been left with no alternative but to initiate the procedures for the involuntary termination of this Development Order. On December 15, 1998, this Board held a public hearing to review the status of Development Order 94- 001 and to consider the involuntary cancellation ofthis Development Agreement. Atthat public hearing testimony was received from both the property owner and members of the general public as to the merits of maintaining or canceling Development Agreement DVA-94-001. At the conclusion of this public hearing, the Board announced its intention to hold a second public hearing on this matter on January 5, 1999, @ 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 99-002 which, if approved, would rescind the approvals granted under DevelopmentAgreement 94-001, for the reason cited above. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 99-002. If you have any questions, please let us know. SUBMITTED: RWIDJMI MIDSQR1(a56} cc: County Administrator Asst. County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director County Engineer Planning Manager Paul Rhodes 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 '--' ......,¡ RESOLUTION NO. 99-002 FILE NO: DV A-98-002 A RESOLUTION RESCINDING THE PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 94-001, ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMMERCIAL PROJECT KNOWN AS MIDWAY SQUARE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence presented on December 15, 1998 and on January 5, 1999, including but not limited to the submitted staff reports on this matter, has made the following determinations: 1. On December 11, 1990, FLORIDA COAST INVESTORS, LTD. received site plan approval for the construction of a shopping center and related areas of development at the intersection of West Midway Road and South 25th Street, in the unincorporated area of St. Lucie County, as described further in Part B below. The development project is known as Midway Square. 2. On September 13, 1994, a Development Agreement (DVA-94- 001) was entered into between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, and FLORIDA COAST INVESTORS, LTD., a Florida limited partnership in accordance with the Florida Local Government Development Agreement Act, 163.3220 -163 .3243, Fla. Stat. (Act), and Section 11.08.00 (Development Agreements) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code (LDC) , as recorded in OR Book 0925, page 1307 through 1333, of the land records of St. Lucie County. 3. Development Agreement DVA-94-001 imposed certain conditions upon the development of Midway Square, including a requirement that the developer commence, and complete, certain improvements to the intersection of West Midway Road and South 25th Street (paragraph 9, DVA- 94-001) i to commence and complete the initial phase of construction of this shopping center (paragraph 4, DVA- 94-001) by certain dates and to annually prepay a portion of the required Road Impact Fees for this development Resolution 99-002 Page 1 January 5, 1999 Final 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 \wi "" site (Paragraph 7, DVA-94-001.) 4. On July 21, 1998, this Board held a public hearing on the request of FLORIDA COAST INVESTORS, LTD., to amend Development Agreement DVA-94-001, however, before this hearing could be held, FLORIDA COAST INVESTORS, LTD., submitted a written request to withdraw the proposed amendments from further consideration and that they, FLORIDA COAST INVESTORS, LTD., would immediately proceed to meet the required obligations of DVA-94-001. 5. FLORIDA COAST INVESTORS, LTD., has acknowledged to the County and, and this Board at the Pubic Hearing of December 15, 1998, that they do not intend to meet the obligations of Paragraphs 4 and 9 of DVA-94-001. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of the St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Consistent with the provisions of Paragraph 8, of Development Agreement DVA-94-001, the site plan approvals, development authorizations and all attendant capacity reservations associated with, or for, the Midway Square Shopping Center as described in Development Agreement DVA-94-001, are hereby rescinded and declared to be void. D. The Midway Square Shopping Center property on which DVA- 94-001 was applied to, is described as follows: The north 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 5, Township 36S, Range 40E, excepting all rights-of-way for public roads and drainage canals. Said parcel also being referred to as Lots 82 & 83, White City subdivision, as recorded in PB I, Pg 23, Public Records of St. Lucie County. together with: The south 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NE 1/4 of Section 5, Township 36S, Range 40E, excepting all rights-of-way for public roads and drainage canals. Said parcel also being referred to as lot 97, White City subdivision, as recorded in PB I, Pg 23, Public Records of St. Lucie County. less and expecting the following: Resolution 99-002 Page 2 January 5, 1999 Final 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 "-' '-' Commence at the northwest corner of the above described property; said corner being also a point on the easterly ROW of Jorgensen Road (a 40 foot ROW); thence S 00 11' 29" E, a distance of 1296.92 feet to a point on the north ROW of Midway Road, said point being also 60.00 feet north of the centerline of said road; thence N 890 50' 27" E along said ROW line, a distance of 899.93 feet to the POB; thence N 00 34' 08" W, a distance of 200 feet; thence N 890 50' 27" E, a distance of 326.70 feet to the west ROW of South 25th Street; thence S 00 15' OS" E along said ROW, a distance of 200.00 feet more or less to the aforementioned north ROW line of Midway Road, said point being 73.00 feet, west of the centerline of South 25th Street and 60.00 feet north of the centerline of said Midway Road; thence S 890 50' 27" W along said north ROW line, of Midway Road a distance of 325.59 feet to the POB, containing 1.50 acres, more or less. C. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the Midway Square Shopping Center site plan drawings which shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. D. Within 14 days of the adoption of this Resolution Rescinding Development Agreement DVA-94-001, the Clerk to the Board shall record this Resolution in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. A copy of the recorded Resolution shall be submitted to the Florida Department of Community Affairs within 14 days after this Resolution is recorded. E. A copy of this Recorded Resolution shall be sent, return receipt, to: Paul Rhodes, General Partner Florida Coast Investors, Ltd. 251-A Royal Palm Way, Suite 300 Palm Beach, FL 33480 upon it's recording. F. This Resolution rescinding Development Order DVA-94-001 shall become effective upon adoption. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was follows: as Chairman Paula A. Lewis xxx Resolution 99-002 Page 3 January 5, 1999 Final 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ~ ~ '--' Vice-Chairman John Bruhn xxx Commissioner Cliff Barnes xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx Commissioner Doug Coward xxx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 5th day of January, 1999. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: DEPUTY CLERK COUNTY ATTORNEY 99-002(a56) DJM Resolution 99-002 Page 4 January 5, 1999 Final '--' '-' ~ en "'0 ro:J o Ü ~ o o I Q) Q) ro -0 en ~ o ~ en Q) > c \ C \;\ ü ü CO s o ~ o LL I 4·. i/ " ::i '" ~ :::> o () '9'()(J OVOI:! 3NIl 3~NVèJ ex:: w > ã: 00 '" '" z « is ~ 4 ' ~: ~: ~: :ñ' w' z' 'i" 'f!' "" ~, 4 Z 4 o Z 4 ~ o OVOI:! NOllijll'J oV'OtJ G33NS " J lVNVJ £ -J > 4 ~ o Z 4 ~ o ~oþ.'V ,/ 00 '" S£ % 17£ AlNno:::> 3380H:::>33>10 ~z '" ...., 6 <: ~ " '" 6 » p.UJ o <: " 0 :> ...., " cO '" 6 » .. ...., 0 .~ '¡¡ " - 6 " 6 :a o p. u cO .. on o " '-' ~ ~ g " · .0 E · > o z w -' , u . u ¡ a , a o ~ · ~ '" '" · '" o m u '" 4 Z U ~ z :::> o () 00 '" z ~ ~ :;:; cr Land Use "..... \ D! , , 8~ (~;~:.....\ \ ' ) I \ .....- , RS I I I : II I -¡ P/F I I I I 18 RS 'II~ BCC 99-001 ---- ....... Florida Coast Investors, Ltd. RS 8'11 West Midway Rood (.- '-- 11 ~ ----------------- Q) Q) '- .... V1 :5 LJ") ('\ :5 :J o V1 58 111 12 "0 o o a::: >. Q) "i o I RS Community Development ~ Geographic Information Systems Map prepared November 20, 1998 _ mop has -. COIT' >iI4od fargenoralplaMi1g ond .......,. JUpOOM only. N _ -v effort has -. modo ID provide the moot~ one! ....... Inform8Iion pooIIbIe, R I. "" _ far _ .. . iIgIIy binding -.nenL Zoning ,,'" ¡D¡ , , 8@ (··(7:......, \\ '....) J AR-1 I I I I I I --I I I I I I II 18 R-1 11«»1 BCC 99-001 ---- ~ ~ Florida Coast Investors, Ltd. AR-1 8'11 West Midway Rood (. '-. CN AG-117 ~ ----------------- IV IV '- ..... (/) :5 ¡() N :5 :) o (/) CO 18 AR-1 111 N 12 "t) 0 0 a:: RS-2 2!1 >- IV "i 0 J: Drive Community Development t Geographic Information Systems Map prepared November 20, 1998 Thi. mop """ -. COI!1I>Ied fergononolplomk1g ond --- purpoMII rriI· N WhIle fNf1lY eIfon hu -. ..- II> I'fO'Ido tho mcot CUII1II1t ond ocanIo __ poooIbIo. ~ Ie not __ fer.... .. . IagaIy blndng -...ant. - ........... .... ~LL '. Q~.,'-../\ ~-9 '--' Mabel B. Fawsett 2417 N. Ocean Drive Ft. Pierce, Fla. 34949 Dear Chairman Lewis, and County Commissioners: As a former Planning and Zoning member, I wish to remind you that this project of Florida Coast Investors: Paul Rhodes, Was premature at its best in the Mid 80' s when it came before the Planning and Zoning Board. This was presented to the board as a grandiose state of the art shopping center. Once granted a zoning and land use change, all they did was ruin an 100 year old oak hammock to beat the tree ordinance in St. Lucie County. This is one example of what happens when zoning and land use are . prematurely changed, to the benefit of no one. I support the involuntary termination of this Development Agreement, as I am sure most residents in that area do. Sincerely, /7~3 ,~A;( Mabel B. Fawsett ~ - .... ~, ~ ....,¡ ~ 11 ' ê L \, I ~1\..,1 v\:,,/J .,) ", 1" þt~~¡¡¡t ' 12/14/98 Dear County Commissioners: Since I unavailable to attend this meeting , I must have someone read to you how I feel about Florida Coast Investors. Mr. Paul Rhodes. I support this Involuntary Termination. I feel he has done enough damage to our community. Back in 1985 he came before the county commissioners with a "Velvet Tongue" and a beautiful, drawing, showing what he was going to do. The drawing had lots of Oak Trees and he said, he had promises ITom Publix tbat they would put their store in there too. WRONG!! I called them and they said they hadn't made any commitments at all. ALSO! He said, I will not remove any of the beautiful Oak Trees that line the roads, and no more of any others that do not need to be removed SORRY, WRONG AGAIN!! Another untruth. If you would go back to those minutes or tapes I'm sure you would hear this same thing. Because, when he learned through a contact in the county that the county was planning a tree ordinance, the next thing we knew, he had a bulldozer out ~ there plowing down 100 year old oaks along Midway and Road, and the Hammock. He left a few scrawny and sickly trees which you can still see if you take the time to go look. Commissioners, I believe you should proceed with this Involuntary Termination. Sincerely, Mrs. Clara Jackson 2630 Rainbow Drive. Fort Pierce, Fla. 34982 ~ ....... ~ AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, JANUARY 5,1999 7:00 PM St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners intend to review the existing Development Agreement (DVA-94-001) between Florida Coast Investors, Ltd. and St. Lucie County. The purpose of this review is to consider the involuntary termination of this Development Agreement by St. Lucie County due to the failure of Florida Coast Investors, Ltd. to commence the construction of certain site related roadway improvements as required under DV A-94-001 for the following described property: (Location: Northwest corner of West Midway Road and South 25th Street) THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners on December 18, 1998. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on December 23, 1998. FILE NO. BCC-99-001 ~ . ' ~ ......., lf¡ \0 - N- - .,., .,., - -0 ÕÕÕ - - - - - 0\ ~O 0\ - N - -0 r-- N ~~ - - - - - - - - - - \ON 0\ .,., 00 00 00 OO~ 0\00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 r-- .,., 00 \0 00 00 00 00\0 ~oo 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ~oo 0 - 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\0\ 0\0\ O\~ 00\ 0\0\ 0\ 0\ 0\0\ 0\ 0\ -~ ~O\ 0\0\ 0\ 0\ 0\0\ 0\ 0\ 0\0\ 0\0\ 0\0\ 0\0\ 0\ 0\ M M~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~M r--~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ M M M~ ~~ ~N ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ M MM MM M M MM MM M M r-- M MM MM MM M M M M MM MM MM M M M M M M M M MM MM M M MM M ~ titi ...J...J ...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ~ti ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J ...J...J 00 ~~ p., ~~ ~~ ~p., ~~ ~p., ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ p.,~ ~p., p.,~ ~~ ~p., ~~ p., ~p., ~~ p.,~ ~~ ~~ CIJ ¡,¡¡ 00 ¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡~ ~ 0'1 ¡,¡¡...J ¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡:I: ¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡ :I: ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ :I:¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ .:- ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ Uu u u UU ~~ ~ uo U< ~~ ~~ UU ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ = ~< Z~ ~¡,¡¡ ~~ ~g¡ <... ~~ ¡,¡¡ Z ¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ...æ ææ æ¡,¡¡ Oæ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡ ¡¡jCIJ ææ ææ ææ ææ ææ ¡,¡¡ ææ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ææ ~ I E::...J E:: s::ø:: ø::ø:: ø..~ -~ s::ø: ø::s:: E:: E:::á ~E:: E:: E:: E:: ø::ø:: 0'1 ~ø.. ø..ø.. ...ø.. ø..¡,¡¡ ~~ ø..ø.. ø..ø.. ø..ø.. ø..ø.. ø..ø.. ø..ø.. ø..ø.. .... ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~::E CIJ... ...- ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ g~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ø.. 00 0 00 00 00 O~ 00 0... 00 00 0 ~~ 00 00 ¡,¡¡o lit 00 00 0 00 0 00 00 00 t: u ~U ~ ~p., ~~ ClJp., ~p., ~ø.. :I:~ ~p., ~~ ~~ ~ It~ ~~ ~p., >~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ...J ø.. 0 CIJ 0 ø.. M ooe: ~ O:I: ~ 0 CIJ Nø.. > >- "'\0 ...J ~ -0 CIJ 3 ~ < ?3~ < ~ ~ E ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ¡,¡¡ ~ ~g ~ ~ ~ ¡,¡¡O ...J ¡,¡¡ ~3 33 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 ~~ ~~ u ~ ¡,¡¡ ::E æ æ æ ~~ ææ Z ææ æ z>- ~ ~... >-~ ¡,¡¡ 00 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 00 ~i ~ CIJ >- ~ ...Jo ...0 ~ ~ ...~ ¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡< CIJ... <CIJ ~- ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ -z CIJ CIJ CIJ CIJCIJ CIJ CIJCIJ CIJ ~~ r-- ~CIJ ~CIJ ~~ :I: ~~ ~o CIJ< ~ ClJu æ I I æ~ zz æ ææ æ 8 ~CIJ ¡:sa 0 0 ¡:Sg .,., ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡o ...Jo ~~ U ...... ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~>- 00 ~~ ~ ~~ 0 o- N ...J...J ~~ <¡:S ~ CIJ>- >->- >- >- >- >- >- ~ >->- >-...J ClJo ~ ;!d~ N ~::E - o¡,¡¡ ?3gj ~~ ~ gj gj gj gj ~~ gj~ ggu :q~ ~ CIJ"" ~ê ~ Qg ~ >< uO ~~ ~ ~ ~ -0 00 0 00 0 Q~ ~~ CIJ< CIJCIJ M..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 0 .,.,< ooCIJ 0 ClJO 0 0 0 0 0 OZ "CI N .,., N N - O~ ><- - 0< ~ - - .,., - -0 ~ OCIJ M .,., 00\ 00 8 ~8 ~;g \0 00 ;:; N § N ~~ 000 ~8 "CI or-- 00 0 0 ""N o~ \0 00 ~- 0 .,., 00 0\ r-- - .,., ~8i 0 N< 0\0\ NO\ ;g¡:: 0 0 - ~ 00 < 00 - N M ~ or-- ~~ r-- r-- r-- .,., 00 00 r-- 000\ 0\ ;:;u 0\\0 r-- r-- r-- ~.,., .,., .,., .,., .,., .,., .,., \0\0 O\~ ~O\ N M 1"1 .,., M ~ ~ ~N ø.. ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~N ø.. -~ -~ MM M ""1"1 1"11"1 1"1 N N N N 1"1 NN NM N M ... Z ...J ~ < 0... ~¡,¡¡ < ClJø.. ~ <~ o¡,¡¡ ..... ...J ~o 0 æ~ ~ g z 0 o~ CIJ< ~< ...J < ...J ~ ...J... ~~ !(~ ~ u @~ ~ ~ ~ ó ~ a 0 ~cñ 9 ø.. ~~ U 0 CIJ~ ~ 4,) ~ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ >- . ~. .... cñ Oø.. o§ z' CIJ~ ~ Q ~. N ~ ~ 00 0 5§ CIJ 00:9 4,) ~¡¡: gj~ CIJ ~ =.,;¡ a 0 ~ ~o ~ cJ ...J ø.. QQ ~ ~< ~ .S .;; = < 8g 0 .... ... z u uu ..... CIJ ...~ = = a .... ~ ... 4,) < < u .s ~ ~ = < z >- ~ = .... § u < .... ß ~ ...J> U ... S ::E 0 .... < z ::E ...J U U CJ ~ ... ~~ CIJ ~ ~ ~ ... = < j:I: ...J ¡,¡¡ CIJ ~ ; 0 -= = ¡,¡¡ < ~u Ü < g¡ ~ ~ ~ CIJ < ~ ¡,¡¡ ~ UCIJ ¡,¡¡ 8d o<:! B u ~ ::E ... = ~ < >- o<:!~ ~ 0 0 :I: 0- ~ o<:! ::Ee; CIJ 2 0 ~ ~ o<:! ~ 5 Þ/)"CI ... ø.. ~u :I: 8 ... o<:! CIJ ~¡,¡¡ >- o<:!< = ... < ..... CIJ o<:! o<:!o<:! < ëj ...J 0 ::E CIJ z [2¡,¡¡ ... 4,) ... E ... ~ CIJ ~ ~~ .....~ z o<:! ~¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡ :I: 0 ~ ~~ o<:! ~.s ø.. CIJ 0 Zo<:! 0 ~CIJ :.::e; e; ...J ,..., o<:! o<:!0 ~ o<:! e; ...J ::ECIJ ~ ~o<:! o<:! ..... gj 0 o<:!~ o<:! o<:! ß!3 < ~ u ;=~ 0 ~ .,:f;I;. ~o e:: CIJ..... ...J 0 o<:! < ~~ ~!i ~ CIJ 0 ~ ClJo :j o~ ~~ >- < ~ 0 ~~ ~ ...J o<:! ~ ~ = I ~ 0 >-...J ...J o<:! ~~ gj ...J..... 0 0 õ ... >- :I:o<:! ¡,¡¡ 4,) ,-. ~ ~ ~ :I: o~ ~~ ~ ¡,¡¡ CIJ< 53 CIJ i :> ~Z ...J ~ æ ¡,¡¡e; ~ ~~ 0 ::¡ u :á~ aN 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~CIJ @~ ~ ~ < ~ ~d u ~ ~ CIJ U ~ ~~ ¡,¡¡ c.i 0 :I: u ¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡ ø.. ~.~ ~ :á 0 ...~ ~ ~ ~ &;~ ~ ~ ~ ...J uø.. = I ..... ... Z ~ ¡,¡¡¡,¡¡ ~ u~ ~ ... . g; 0 ~ -...J 8 ~~ ~ ~ Q ::.l si ~o - 00 CIJ ~;. ~ u <~ ~~ ø.....J ~ ¡;;¡,¡¡ i5 > ....J 4,)0'1 ::.l ~ ~ ...J 0...J ¡,¡¡ ~ . cñ ¡:s 0 <- >- ~ ø... .¡,¡¡ ~ ~ u ~~ ~ I .... U ¡,¡¡ cñ= ...z ~ o~ ...J ~13 ~ ~ ~ u...J ~ ~ ~ cñ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~§ CIJ 4,)< ~ ~ ~ CIJ ...j ~ CIJ g¡ IE ~ 4,) ~ ~ 0 ~ ~~ ø..< ~ >~ ~ a:i' ~ :I:::.l ~ ~~ ~ ...JCIJ ...J¡,¡¡ ... Q> a CIJ VJ ::E8 ...J §~ ~ ~o ð ~ ¡,¡¡ ~ª ~~ ~ o<:!S u~ 0 ~ ~ ¡§8 CIJ 0 ÈB = ¡,¡¡ L:5 gj :á:I: ~ ¡,¡¡ ¡,¡¡ 0 ~ 8 0 ~ ~~ § 0 ~~ :á~ 0 z ~ ¡,¡¡ .....gj z ::E tiu 0 u U :I: > ¡,¡¡~ ..... ¡,¡¡ Z~ ...J CIJ CIJ ~ p., =.... == a= act. =0'1 ~~ .,., - M ~ 00 .,., - ~~ .,., - \0 ~ or-- ::t 00 - ~~ \Or-- 00 _ ~ §~§§§ ~ § i ::t ~~ 00 .,., UU ~ij § ~~ ~ ....= õõ 0 §§ 0 0 ~~ ~~ § §§ 08 08 §§ ~ § ~~ 8 ~ - N 89 ~ .,., N N 9 9c:r 9c:r 9 M = I 0 -0 99 c:r c:r c:r c:r 8 CIJ .... .... .,.,\0 ..¡. "¡'Ib \0 \0 ibM M M ~~ .,., r-- r-- r-- r-- 0\ 0 N M i Ib~ ~~ N"" §§ M ~~N.A~ ~ ij 00 ~ o- N ::¡ ~ 0 = .~ 00 00 ~ 88 88 O\~ ~ :! :! :!:! :! :!~ \0 \0\0 ~~ §§ ~ ~ 8 ijij ij < 4,)";¡ ~ 99 8õ õ 0 c:rc:r c:r c:rc:r c:r c:rc:r 0 00 õ ~~~~, c:r 9 0 ~ a Þ/) , , NN NN N N N NN N :±:± ' , 0 N N N N 1"1 NN N N N N NN N M ~:!: M- Ñõõõõ õ ÕÕ õ õ 1:: = Q 00 0 00 00 00 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 ON M- ~ 0 0 0 0 N ~ .... ~~ ";' .,., .,., .,., .,., .,., .,., ";' ";' "Q"Q ";' ~"'? ";' ~"Q ";' "Q~ .,., .,.,N M - - - -;''1 '100000000 "? "? "? "? "? opop "? "? 0 == , , ~M MM .A 8t t¿ aAaA I , I I .,., C. ... 10'1 MM M M M M M MM M M M M MM M MM .,., .,., .,., 'I') 1.1') 'I') V") 1.1') .,., .,., .,., .,., .,., .,., .,., .,., .,., M ~ 4,) = = 00 0 00 00 00 0 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 0 00 00 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 Q~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ I~ I~ I~ VJ ~ i.; ,... .. '-" ...., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. ifB DATE: January 5, 1999 CONSENT REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ X J Leg. [X J Quasi-JD. SUBMITTED BY: Community Development irector TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 99-001 providing fa a serles of General Amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. BACKGROUND: Draft Ordinance 99-001 proposes a series of amendments to the County's Land Development Code. These amendments are general in nature and are as a result of specific requests of members of the Board, and staff initiated technical corrections to the County's Land Development Code. This is the first of two (2) required public hearings on these amendments. The second required public hearing will be on February 2, 1999 @ 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board accept any public comments or testimony on Draft Ordinance 99-001 and continue this first public hearing until Tuesday, January 19, 1999 @ 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. The required second public hearing on Draft Ordinance 99-001 will be held on Tuesday, February 2, 1999 @ 7:00 PM or as so n thereafter as possible. COMMISSION ACTION: [ } APPROVED [J DENIED [v'J OTHER: Continue first public hearing to January 19, 1999. Hold second public hearing on February 2, County Attorney: w Coordination/siqnatures Mgt & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept: Other: Other: Finance: (copies only): (AGEND40S) --~ '-" '-' ~'9 COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: January 5, 1999 Ordinance 99-001 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Ray Wazny, Community Development Director DATE: December 23, 1998 SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 99-001 providing for a series of General Amendments to the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code. Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 99-001 which proposes a series of amendments to the County's Land Development Code. The amendments included in this Draft Ordinances are: Section 2.00.00 Definitions: · Draft Ordinance 99-001 proposes to amend the definition of Hotel/ Motel clarifying the length of stay typically associated with these facilities. · This section proposes to amend the definition of Open Space to address the use of private property in the detennination of open space and to add a new definition for areas considered to be Common Open Space. · This section proposed to create new definition for temporary buildings or structure and transient lodging facilities. Section 3.01.03(E) Zoning Districts: · This section amends the accessory uses provisions of the AR-l Zoning District to clarify the use of mobile homes subject the standards set forth in Section 7.01.05 of this Code. Section 4.01.05 Hutchinson Island - Building Height Overlay Zone · This amendment provides for clarification of existing vested development rights and for the ability to locate Telecommunication Towers on Hutchinson Island, subject to meeting the requirements of Section 7.10.23. _0 ~ ....." December 23, 1998 Page 2 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-001 Section 6.06.00 Mining Section 6.06.0 l(B)(1I) Restrictions, Regulations, and Conditions on Mining Pennit · The amendments to this Section clarify those areas of the county in which Mining activities are to be prohibited. Section 6.06.02(C) Extraction Incidental to Development Activities · This proposed amendment provides for an exemption for the construction of stonnwater retention facilities associated with the construction of roadway projects. Section 7.01.00 Planned Unit Development Section 7.01.02 Authorized Uses · This section provides for a clarification of the authorized uses in a Planned Unit Development. Section 7.01.03(a) Standards and Requirements . · This amendment provides for change in the minimum size of a Planned Unit Development from 10 acres to five (5) acres. This change is necessary if, consistent with the general direction of the County Commission, the County is to encourage the use of the POO zoning district for small scale development sites. The only other alternative is for a property owner is to seek a variance from these standards under the provisions of Section 10.00.00 of the Land Development Code. Section 7.01.03(e)(5) Standards and Requirements · This amendment provides for a clarification on the ability to use variable standards in road right-of- way widths in a Planned Unit Development. It has been the practice of the County to pennit such variations, under broad interpretations of the provisions of the POO regulations. However this amendment serves to further clarify the authority for granting such considerations. All construction must still be to County Code and it shall remain the responsibility of any applicant for POO approval seeking to take advantage of this section to demonstrate compliance with the intent of the County's minimum ROW width standards. Section 7.0 1.03 (I) Standards and Requirements · These amendments clarify what areas may be counted as Open Space. Section 7.02.00 Planned Non-residential Development Section 7.02.02 Pennitted Uses · This section clarifies the necessity of any proposed Telecommunications Tower to comply with the requirements of Section 7.10.23 of this Code. _--_.,1 '-" ....., December 23, 1998 Page 3 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-001 Section 7.02.03(B) Standards and Requirements · This amendment clarifies the ability to establish variable minimum lot standards in a Planned Non- Residential Development. Section 7.02.03(D) Standards And Requirements · This amendment provides for a clarification on the ability to use variable standards in road right-of- way widths in a Planned Non-Residential Development. It has been the practice of the County to permit such variations, under broad interpretations of the provisions of the PNRD regulations. However this amendment serves to further clarify the authority for granting such considerations. All construction must still be to County Code and it shall remain the responsibility of any applicant for PNRD approval seeking-to take advantage of this section to demonstrate compliance with the intent of the County's minimum ROW width standards. . Section 7.01.03Œ) Standards and Requirements · These amendments clarify what areas may be counted as Open Space. Section 7.03.00 Planned Mixed Use Develo1)ment Section 7.03.02 Permitted Uses And Locations · This section provides for a clarification of the authorized uses III a Planned Mixed Use Developments. Section 7.03.03(E) Standards and Requirements · This amendment provides for a clarification on the ability to use variable standards in road right-of- way widths in a Planned Mixed Use Development. It has been the practice of the County to permit such variations, under broad interpretations ofthe provisions of the PMUD regulations. However, this amendment serves to further clarify the authority for granting such considerations. All construction must still be to County Code and it shall remain the responsibility of any applicant for PMUD approval seeking to take advantage of this section to demonstrate compliance with the intent of the County's minimum ROW width standards. . Section 7.03.03(K) Standards and Requirements .. These amendments clarify what areas may be counted as Open Space. Section 7.05.00 Transportation Systems Section 7.05.02(A)(l0) Streets . This proposed amendment is to provide additional direction and guidance in the review of roadway --~-")I \..i ....,I December 23, 1998 Page 4 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-001 construction plans for new County road projects and private development plans. Section 7.05.02(A)(13) Streets · This proposed amendment is to provides for additional direction and guidance in the required method of signing on local street and roads. Section 7.05.08(H) Street Naming and Identification · This Section amends the authority for naming or renaming streets from the County Engineer to the Community Development Director. This is technical adjustment to bring both street address assignments, which already are administered by the Development Director, and street naming to the same Department. Section 7.06.00 Off-Street Parking and Loading Section 7.06.01 Generallv · The amendments to this Section require that with any change in use, all current off-street parking standards and requirements shall be complied with. These amendments do not apply to businesses that utilize a common parking area, such as a shopping center or multi-tenant office complex. All parking lots constructed after the effective date of this amendment shall be required to paved with a County approved all weather surface. Section 7.06.02(A) Off-Street Parking · This Section amends the parking ratio for hotel and motel uses. This is to correct a scriveners error in the existing ratio which incorrectly sets the standard at one and one hundredth (1.01) space per guest unit as opposed to one and one tenth (1.1) space per guest unit. Section 7.06.02(B) Off-Street Parking · The amendments in this section clarify and reinforce existing regulations governing the applicability of these parking standards. This Section further re-enforces the parking restrictions within any required landscape area. 7.09.00 Landscaping and Screening · The amendments to this Section require that with any change in use, all current landscaping standards and requirements shall be complied with. These amendments do not apply to businesses that utilize a common parking areas, such as a shopping center or multi-tenant office complex. Section 7.09.03(D) General Provisions · This section amends and strengthens the requirements for maintaining on-site landscaping. If violations of the requirements of this section are reported, they are to be prosecuted through the __. _I \..-; """ December 23, 1998 Page 5 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-001 Code Enforcement Board. Section 7.09.03Œ) Plant Materials · This section amends the minimum tree planting requirements by increasing the minimum height of all trees to be planted from ten (10) feet to twelve (12) feet. Twelve feet is consistent with the minimum landscaping requirements of the City of Port St. Lucie, and is similar to the minimum tree heights of other municipal landscaping regulations in the Treasure Coast Area. This section also provides for additional amendment to the minimum height of palm trees; the ability to group trees in order to achieve the minimum crown spread; the ability to use more than 50% palm plantings on Hutchinson Island if it is demonstrated to the satisfaction ofthe Community Development Director that the intent ofthis code is being complied with and that other species will not survive in high salt exposure areas; the minimum height of all required shrubs has been increased to thirty (30) inches on 18 inch planting centers; and all required landscaping shall be 100% native species to this region of Florida. The tree height and 100% native requirement are proposed to have a phased effective period in order to allow for adequate local plant stocks to be grown and made available. · In addition, the section strengthen the requirements for the use of existing native vegetation in the development of any required on-site landscape plan. Section 7.09.04 General Landscaping Requirements · This section has been amended to strength and clarify the general landscape and design standards for the County. These standards are patterned after recent amendments to the Codes in the City of Port St. Lucie. · Paragraph J ofthis section establishes new minimum landscape standards applicable to certain types of agricultural production use and activities. It should be noted that these regulations do not apply to crop fields or to out buildings unless that are used for the production of animals. · Paragraph K provides for the establishment of minimum site lighting and shielding requirements where commercial uses are adjacent other residential and use. On October 15, 1998, the Local Planning AgencylPlanning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on Draft Ordinance 99-00 I. After that hearing, the LP A voted to recommended that the Board approve draft Ordinance 99-00 I, as amended and to defer any action on certain Sections of the original. draft. Those Sections have been removed from the current draft of Ordinance 99-001 and will be scheduled for Board review at a latter date. This is the first of two (2) required public hearings of Draft Ordinance 99-00 I. The second public hearing on this Draft Ordinance is scheduled for February 2, 1999 @ 7:00 PM, or as soon thereafter as possible. Staff recommends that the Board accept any public comments or testimony on Draft Ordinance 99-00 I and continue this first public hearing until Tuesday, January 19, 1999 @ 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. The required second public hearing on Draft Ordinance 99-001 will be held on Tuesday, February 2, 1999 @ 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. ,-". December 23, 1998 Page 6 If you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMIITED RW/DJM/cb OR9902ml(disk 8) cc: County Administrator Asst. County Administrator County Attorney Planning Manager - - ...., Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-001 - \..f 'wtI 1 ORDINANCE NO. 99-001 2 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND 4 DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 2.00.00, DEFINIT NS, 5 TO PROVIDE FOR AMENDMENT TO THE DEF NITIO OF 6 HOTEL/MOTEL AND OPEN SPACE; AND BY C T NEW 7 DEFINITIONS FOR TEMPORARY BUILDING OR S E AND 8 TRANSIENT LODGING FACILITIES; BY AM G S 1.3(E), 9 AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL ZONING RICT OR 10 A CLARIFICATION ON MOBILES HOMES N A 11 AMENDING SECTION 4,01.05 HUTCHINS 12 OVERLY ZONE, EXCEPTIONS, TO 13 CLARIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO V 14 TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS; 15 6.06.01 (B)(11), MINING, RESTRICTI 16 CONDITIONS ON A MINING PER 17 WHERE MINING ACTIVITIES 18 SECTION 6.06.02, MININ E 19 DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIE 0 PR 20 CONSTRUCTION OF S WA 21 ROADWAY CONSTRU P 22 7.01.02, PLANNED DE 23 PROVIDE FOR C CATI 24 SE N 7.01. NED 25 ME REDU THE MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE 26 FOR D UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BY CLARIFYING 27 TO OM MINIMUM RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH 28 THIN NNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND BY 29 A GOVERNING OPEN SPACE WITHIN A 30 OPMENT; BY AMENDING SECTION 7.02.02, 31 ENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, PERMITTED USES, TO 32 RIFICATION OF USES ALLOWED INCLUDING 33 TELECOMM CATIONS TOWERS; BY AMENDING SECTION 7.02.03, 34ø N-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, STANDARDS AND 35 NTS, BY CLARIFYING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR 36 ATION OF MINIMUM SITE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS" ---------~~rliMi;f~~d~ti~--------- ÐtriJce Tlire~~1i is for deletion DOuble@Underline;,f'Reditdine is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 1 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 ~ 'wi 1 BY CLARIFYING THE ABILITY TO VARY FROM MINIMUM RIGHT-OF- 2 WAY WITH STANDARDS WITHIN A PLANNED NONRESIDENTIAL 3 DEVELOPMENT AND BY CLARIFYING STANDARDS GOVERNING OPEN 4 SPACE WITHIN A PLANNED NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; BY 5 AMENDING SECTION 7.03.02, PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOP NT, 6 PERMITTED USES AND LOCATIONS TO p, I FOR 7 CLARIFICATION OF USES ALLOWED; BY AME CTION 8 7.03.03, PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOP T, SAND 9 REQUIREMENTS BY CLARIFYING T EQUI FOR 10 DETERMINATION OF MINIMUM SITE DIM IONA S, 11 BY CLARIFYING THE ABILITY TO V AR 0 12 WAY WITH STANDARDS WITHIN 13 DEVELOPMENT AND BY CLARIFYING ST 14 SPACE WITHIN A PLANNED MIXED 15 AMENDING SECTION 7.05.02(A), T 16 STREETS, BY PROVIDING CLARIFYI 17 THE PLANS OF THE ST. L 18 ORGANIZATION AND ROAD 19 AMENDING SECTION 7.05.0 20 PROVIDING FOR BICYCLE 21 FOR THE RESPONSIBI 22 SECTION 7.06.00, 23 PROVIDING GENE 24 TH ECONST 25 U TER U SE 27 STÄ 28 MB 29 TRE 30 PR HIBITED; BY AMENDING SECTION 7.09.00 31 CREENING, TO PROVIDE FOR A SERIES OF 32 ENTS REQUIRING THE REPLACEMENT OR 33 LL EXISTING LANDSCAPING WITH A CHANGE IN USE 34 G COMPLIANCE, BY ENHANCING THE REQUIREMENTS 35 ANCE OF PLANTED LANDSCAPING AND PROVIDING 36 , BY AMENDING THE GENERAL STANDARDS FOR PLANT 37 ALS, BY AMENDING SECTION 7.09.04 CLARIFYING THE ---------~~rli~i;f~~d~Uoo--------- Stri][e Tflrel:1~R is for deletion Dottb1iéiUndérliinéARédiJ1.itte is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 2 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 " '-" '-" REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET RIGHT-OF-WAY, ABUTTING PROPERTIES PARKING AND INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS, BUFFER REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN NON-RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES, OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING AREAS AND BY CREATING EW REGULATIONS GOVERNING ON-SITE LIGHTING ST A AND LANDSCAPE AND SCREENING STANDA DS A LE TO CERTAIN AGRICULTURAL USE AND ACTIVI ; B GFOR CONFLICTING PROVISION, BY PROVI FOR LlTY, PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY, PROV G FO DEPARTMENT OF STATE, PROVIDING R A PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND PRO WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners the following determination: 1. On August 1, 1990, the Boar County, Florida, adopted Code. rs of St. Lucie d Development 2. The Board of amendments to through the foil s has adopted certain Land Development Code, 91-09 - 92-17 - 93-03 - 93-06 - 94-07 - 94-21 - 96-10 - 97-09 - May 14,1991 June 2, 1992 February 16, 1993 May 25, 1993 June 22, 1994 August 16, 1994 August 6, 1996 October 7, 1997 er 15, 1998, the Local Planning Agency/ Planning and ommission held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance ublishing notice in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune at 10 days prior to the hearing and recommended that the ---------~~diMi;f~~d~ti~--------- Ctri]ce ThreH!,!,R is for deletion DonbleUnder:line¥;Red1d;ne is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 3 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 \...; .....", proposed ordinance be approved. 4. On January 5, 1999 this Board held its first public hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune on December 23, 1998. 5. On January 19, 1999 this Board held its se ond pu proposed ordinance, after publishing a of Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune nuary 6. The proposed amendments to Development Code are consistent objectives and standards of the St. Lu and is in the best interest of the health citizens of St. Lucie County, Florida NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINE Lucie County, Florida: PART A. Commissioners of St. IE COUNTY CODE AND COMPILED ******************* CHAPTER II DEFINITIONS e, the following terms shall have the meanings herein ascribed to them. ---------~~dIMisf~~d~ti~--------- ÐtriJte Tà.reti!JR is for deletion DØUb&'I$Iw¡¡¡ndeïi,!Ii'in&"TRedil1$ne is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 4 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 A building in which lodging is provided or offered to the public for compensation, qenerallv with 2 occupancies of less than four (4) weeks.. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 TRANSIENT LODGING FACILITIES: 24 Structures with units or rooms 25 includin without limitations 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 RICT USE REGULATIONS 36 37 38 39 40 AGRICULTURAL. RESIDENTIAL - 1 41 ---------- - --~-------------- for addition is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 5 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Paragraphs 1 through 6 - no change 7. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following: a. Agriculture (farms and ranches accessory to single4amily det b. Animals, subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.03. (999) c. Guest house subject to the requirements of Se d. Mobile Home sub'ecfto the re uirements 0 d7 e. Retail and wholesale trade - subordinate to ********************* 4.01.00 HUTCHINSON ISLA ZONE 4.01.05 EXCEPTIONS The following structures are not s A. nder Section 1.03.03 of this Code. kB. by or for a duly authorized public safety activity. &C. imilar communications transmission poles. G.D. eillance devices. ******************************** --- ------ -i;f~ad~tioo----- --- is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 6 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ,..,. CHAPTER VI RESOURCE PROTECTION STANDARDS 6.06.00 MINING 6.06.01 RESTRICTIONS, REGULATIONS, AND CONDlTI A. It shall be illegal to excavate or mine, as defined in without first obtaining a mining permit for such acti 8. All mining operations conducted under authority of a of this Code shall be subject to the following restricti Paragraphs 1 through 10- 11. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: Mining shall not be permitted in th a. Within any jurisd' Statutes, or within occur within a Florida Wate as either "p Section 373.421 (1), Florida etland except that mining may been determined by the South of establishing wetland quality rrounded by uplands, if and to the extent~ permitted in accordance with Section 6.02.03 ities have received appropriate environmental resource permits nce with Part IV (Management and Storage of Surface pter 373 (Water Resources). Florida Statues, and; mitigation shall be on..site or at a mitigation site approved by St. County, except that no wetlandlittora! zone constructed in accord with irements of Section 6.06.03 of this code may be counted towards this uired mitigation. North Indrio/Savanna ------ ------------ is for addition Stri]rc Through is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 7 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 .24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 .34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 -- -- e;.d. Atlantic Coastal Ridge; ~ e:- C08stallligh Hazard Area; or, f. Dune Preservation Zone. 6.06.02 EXTRACTION INCIDENTAL TO DEVELOP A. Temporary mining activities may be performed as p approved conditional use permit, a Planned Devel a Development of Regional Impact for w submitted and found sufficient for review prior to undertaking such activities, a including obtaining a mining permit Section and Section 11.05.11. nt an approved site plan, an reliminary approval, or t Approval has been vided, however, that its must be secured, sioners when required by this B. approved project shall be exempt Requirements, provided that all t havebeen issued by S1. Lucie County and c. ******************************** CHAPTER VII PMENT DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS --------- - i; for adcÏiÜ;;n- -- is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 8 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 - 7.01.00 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 7.01.02 PERMITTED AUTHORIZED USES A. PERMITTED USES Any ttse permitted, conditional or accessory use in the Agri Agricultural-5 (AG-5); Residential/Conservation in the Agricultural-5 (AG-5); Residential/Conservation ( Estate-2 (RE-2); Residential, Single-Family-2 ( Residential, Single-Family-4 (RS-4); Residential, Mul 5 (RMH-5); Residential, Multiple-Family-7 (RM-7); Multiple-Family-11 (RM-11); and Residential, Multi may be permitted in a Planned Unit Developmen residential densities NONRESI 7.01.03 nit Development shall be as follows: A. shall be a minimum of tcn (10) five (5) contiguous acres of land under r control. Paragraphs B through D - No Change ---------- - -------- addition CtriJec Through is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 9 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14- 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 E. TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION Paragraphs 1 through 4 - No Change 5. Paragraphs 6 through 12 I. OPEN SPACE STANDARDS 1 . A minimum of thirty-five (35) percent of th~ Unit Development must be for use recreation areas, marinas, swim or oth abo parking areas. Of the required 35 percen native habitat on th preserved native h original state, C m of 15 percent of any remaining its natural condition. For each acre of um 15 percent that is preserved in its percent per acre towards the remaining --------- - --~-------------- for addition 8tri]cc 'Phrou!'Jh is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 10 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 b. 2. No stteft parcel of land be less than one (1) Planned Unit Development. Open space provided requirements be counted to 7.02.00 7.02.02 ining the permitted use possibilities in any Planned A. or Agricultural classified land use area: ory use, including any sb~ndards,. conditions and requirements in the Commercial, Neighborhood (CN); Commercial, Office (CO); ts, and in the Agricultural land use classified areas only, any cessory use identifiedinthe Agriculture·1 (AG·1), Agricultural·2.5 (AG· (AG·5) zoning districts of this Code. Telecommunication towers must comply of Section 7.10.23. dards, conditions and requirements, as found in this Code, that pertain to conditional ry uses shall be used in the determination of the compatibility of the proposed use( s) with nding land uses in the review of the Planned Nonresidential Development. All applications ---------- - -----------~----- for addition Ctri]rc Through is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 11 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 .... - .. . for Planned Nonresidential Development shall include a complete identification of all planned uses and activities. B. For properties located in any Commercial or Industrial classified land use area: Any permitted, conditional or accessory use, including any standards, conditions for those uses, as identified in the Commercial, Neighborhood (CN Commercial, General (CG); Industrial Light(IL); Industrial Heavy(IH zoning districts, and any non-residential permitted or (AG-1), Agricultural-2.5 (AG-2.5), or Agricultural- Telecommunication towers must com I with the The general standards, conditions and requirements, and accessory uses shall be used in the d the surrounding land uses in the reviewofthePI for Planned Nonresidential Development shallinclu and activities. 7.02.03 STANDARDS AND REQUIREME Standards and requirements for a Planned N B. , Area, Yard, and a roval iOf1ers may condition approval of a Planned with more stringent or restrictive dimensional surrounding hand uses, to mitigate impact on the to ensure public safety and to ensure compliance with the St. Plan; and, th Hutchinson 'slandthatÞas not been occupied, constructed, or has permit, site plan or other County development approval as a permitted· use 1995, thê requirements of Section 4.01.00, Hutèhinson Island - Building Height I apply. Paragraph C -- No Changes --- --- -- -- is is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 12 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 - - - .. . D. TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION Paragraph 1 through 3 -- No Changes 4. Streets in a Planned Non-Residential Devel retained under private ownership. Said stre with all pertinent County regulations and mini H. OPEN SPACE STANDARDS 1. , a minimum of twenty (20) percent of on-Residential Development must be s, recreation areas, marinas, swim- or other t of the developer, and subject to the approval of the Board of County loners, use of recreational facilities may be offered to the general public. ----- open space, a minimum of fifteen (15) percent of any remaining - -- ------ ------ for addition Ctri]w 'I'hrou!!Jh is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 13 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 -- - .. . native habitat on the property is to be preserved in its natural condition. For each acre of preserved native habitat above the required minimum 15 percent that is preserved in its original state, credit shall be given at a rate of 150 percent per acre towards the remaining open space requirement. open space shall be physically part of the Planned Non-Residential Paragraph I through J -- No Changes ******************************** ------- is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 14 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 ~; 7.03.00 PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT 7.03.02 PERMITTED USES AND LOCATIONS Policy 1.1.6.4 of the 81. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan sets forth an intensity plan for Mixed Use Development (MXD) future land use designation. Planned Mixed U velop is permitted only within the MXD future land use. Permitted uses within the by intensity as specified below. Compatibílíty and relative f d specified in Table 7.1, Compatibility of Uses VS. Road Clas 8. A. High Intensity Any permitted use as identified in the Residential, Home-5 (RMH-5); Residential, Multiple-Family-7 ( Residential, Multiple-Family-11 (RM-11); Res Neighborhood (CN); Commercial, Office (CO); Industrial, Heavy (lH); Utílíty (U); Institutional (I); or use specified in the final PMUD, and any co requirements of Section 11.07.00 be permitted in an area designated with the future Land Use designatio B. Medium Intensity "Family-5 (RM-S); Residential, Mobile Residential, Multiple-Family-9 (RM-9); Commercial, General (CG); Industrial, (J);QrHIRD zoning districts of this Code, any ønditiønaLuse specified in the final PMUD, . ement as set forth in this MediµrJ1I!1t~nsity Mixed Use Development to the extent nations of the 81. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. C. in the Residential, Estate-1· (RE-1); Residential, Estate-2 (RE-2); 2); Residential, Single-FamUy-3(RS-3); Residential, Single-Family4 ple-Family-5 (RM"S); Residential, Mobile Home-5 (RMH-5); Residential, 5); Commercial, Neighborhood (CN); Commercial, Office (CO); CQmmercial, strial, Light (lL); or HIRD zoning districts of this Code, any accessory use PMUD, and any conditional use specified in the final PMUD, subject to the f Section 11.07.00 and anyotherspeciaLrequirementasset forth in this Code may in an area designated Low Intensity Mixed Use Development to the extent consistent ---------- ------ for 8triJcc Throu~h is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 15 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 .. with the future Land Use designations of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Paragraph 0 - No Change 7.03.03 STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS Standards and requirements for a Planned Mixed Use Development shall be Paragraph A through 0 -- N E. TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION Paragraph 1 - No 2. Roadway Design Criteria - The followin circulation. in planning for traffic Paragraph a i. through 0 - no change ph F through J - no change CAPING STANDARDS of thirty-five (35) percent of the gross area of the land to be committed to a ixed Use Development must be for use as arks, recreation areas, marinas, swimming plantingl~.!I, or other~..Ø~ public than r draina e rights-of-way, above Qround utilities, excludinQ exclusive stormwater ---- - - -~d~cioo--------- Ctri](c Through is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 16 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 .. - .. - - treatment facilities,_and parking areas. Of the required 35 percent a minimum of 15 percent of any remaining native habitat on the preserved in its natural condition. For each acre of preserved native habitat above the required minimum 15 percent that is preserved in its original state, credit shall be given at a rate of 150 percent per acre tow e remaining open space requirement. 2. a. b. space shall be less than one of the Planned Mixed Use ------- -i;E~~d~tioo--------- CtriJw '±'hrou~h is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 17 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 .. ............ - ... Landscaping for off-street parking and loading areas shall, as a minimum, meet the requirements of 7.09.00. For Planned Mixed Use Developments to be constructed in stages or phases, the net open space provided in an individual stage or phase may vary from the required thirty-five (35) percent if the approved plan for the Planned Mixed Use Development ides for the required open space, and the County is assured that the 0 provided. Paragraph L through M - ********************* 7.05.00 TRANSPORTATION SYSTE 7.05.02 STREETS A. GENERALLY 10. All new construction fo Service Area shall b determined by th t or roadway within the Urban along one or both sides, as consult the St. Lucie tember 1995 in orroadwa .s,publicorprivate, streets or roadways accordance with Florida Department of Transportation ragraph 14 through 15 - No Change ******************************** EET NAMING AND IDENTIFICATION ---------- Ctrikc Through is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 18 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 - ... .,.. Paragraph A through G - No Change H. AUTHORITY FOR NAMING AND NUMBERING STREETS 1. New streets shall be assigned names or numbers in compliance with the provisions of this Code by the County Cngincer Community Development Director. The Community Development Director is hereby gnanted the similar sounding streets or renumber existIng ~treets to Code. In the case of duplicate names or silT! in streets must be renamed and one (1) str n CommunIty Development Director shall con a of the name, the number of years the street eld th to the names of adjacent streets. - 2. Individuals residing on the street or develop or renaming process by providing s Community DevelopmentDirector . the first choice listed first, second County Engineer the choices provided and veri I. STREET IDENTIFICATION SIGNS street sign as prescribed in the nt Transportation, Federal Highway is manual. No one other than S1. Lucie y officially authorized party may erect or right..of-way that does not conform to the r Director is authorized to remove any EET PARKING AND LOADING ---------- -~-------- P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 19 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 - - -'1IIIIIIII' The requirements of this Section are intended to insure that every building, structure, or use erected or instituted, except for bona-fide agricultural uses and buildings, shall be provided with adequate off- street parking facilities for the use of occupants, employees, visitors, and patrons, and that certain uses be provided with adequate off-street loading facilities, thereby reducing congestion to the public streets and promoting the safety and welfare of the public. B. EXISTING STRUCTURES AND USES ¡CHANGES IN USE Buildings or structures existing as of the effective date of repaired without providing additional off-street park increase in floor area or capacity and no change of u C. olume, capacity, or space occupied of any structure existing sh ult in the cOOlplíance with all off-street parking and loading Code shall be complied with for both existing and new structures. MENT FOR ALL WETHER SURFACE FOR ALL REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING ---------- ~d~U~-~----- - GtriJec Through is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 20 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 -- - 1 AND VEHICULAR USE AREAS. 2 3 All required off-street parkinQ spaces, access. aisles, vehicular use and off-street loadinQ areas 4 constructed, expanded or altered after (inserUstday of first month foJlowinq effective date of this 5 ordinance shall be constructed with an all weather surface meetin the re uir f the St. Lucie 6 County Public Works Department. 7 8 E. NONCONFORMING USES 9 10 When repairs and alterations are to be made in a build 11 street parking requirements contained in this Code I!) 12 alterations exceed fifty (50) percent of the assessed 13 14 15 1.06.02 OFF-STREET PARKING 16 17 A. REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING 18 19 The following off-street parking shall be prov 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32· 33 34 35 36 37 38 B. 1. of a parking stall shall be as follows: 10 feet X 18 feet 8 feet X 23 feet ( insert Figure 7-23) 12 feet X 18 feet (CH 316.1955(3) F.S.) ---------- ---------- Strike ThrtH1"j'R is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 21 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 H 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Two (2) feet of the required eighteen (18) feet may be in grass instead of pavement if that two (2) feet is not included in any other required landscape or separation area. Angled parking may be used consistent with the method of measurement identified in Figure 7-23. b. 90 75 60 45 16 16 c. iVes and aisles for all multi-family, includinQ uses requiring sitc plan approval, êither by painted lines, precast curbs, or in a similar other than shared entrance or exit drives located in shall be installed within ten (10) feet of adjoining property t of any road right-of-way frontage, and said unpaved area shall be nee with Section 7.09.00. g areas for all uses requiring site plan.approval shall be designed so that es can exit without backing into a street, except for single-family, two-family and dwellings. Paragraph f through j - No Change -------- - -~;¡~ Ctri]cc Tarcmgh is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 22 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 Js., Parkinq or display of any motor vehicle, recreational vehicle, boat, trailer or other vehicle in any required landscape area is prohibited. Paragraph 2 through 5 - No Change 7.09.00 LANDSCAPING AND SCREE 7.09.02 APPLICABILITY uses. including all requested . in or , mobile home parks ached single-family ree-family residences e agricultural uses and the activity involving the this code. 7.09.03 GENERAL PROVISI A. ing permit applications associated with any , except for those structures that use or øperatiof},exce¡:)tas mavotherwise be specifically rt of that operation do not involve the retail sale of materials e with the other provisions of this Code, all landscaping plans existing and prøposed utility lines and rights-of-way. The general the relationship of the proposed landscaping to these utility lines and strate compliance with the other provisions of this Code. pe plan shall identity the type and quantity of all plant and tree species to be t with the provisions of this Code. uance of any certificate of occupancy or other final occupancy/use authorization. the y Development Director shall inspect and verify that the landscape plantings on the ------ - - -~d~tioo--------- CtriJw Through is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 23 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 property are consistent with the approved landscaping plans. Paragraph B & C - No Changes D. MAINTENANCE The owner shall be responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping, a good condition so as to present a healthy, neat, and orderly ap debris. Maintenance shall include the replacement of ªII too1 thirty (30) days in conform section or failure to Enforcement Board f extended when necessa b the Coun Adminis of nature such as a hurricane or a freeze. E. PLANT MATERIALS 1 . Quality Plant materials used in conforman standards of Florida No.1 1973, and "Grades and S Agriculture and Consumer Development Director e shall conform to the ards for Nursery Plants", II, Florida Department of resistant, and shall be clean and es When installed. Plant materials that , whose physical characteristics may be and quality of debris so as to present ifiad for use under this Code. m trees may be clustered into groups of three (3) to achieve this minimum fifteen (15) foot crown. All palm trees shall have a minimum clear trunk of ten (10) feet when installed. Three palm trees are equal to one shade tree having a mature spread of fifteen (15) feet. ---------- - - -ad~d~------ -- CtriJcc Th:t:~ is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 24 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 J4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 4ª c. Tree species shall be a minimum often (10) twelve (12) feet in height and have a caliper of two and one-half (21/2) inches at four and one-half (41/2) feet above the ground when installed. HeiqhtshalLbe determined by the averaqe end of all branches not the tallest branch or two. d. All required trees, except palms, shall have a minimum of five (5) and a minimum five (5) foot canopy spread at time of e. Trees of species whose roots areknQw other public works shall not be. pia roads or works, unless the treerQot which the minimum dimensions and for which the construction req reinforced with number six (6) road f. None of the following trees shall be Melaleuca leucadendra (Punk Tree) Ca$uarina spp. (Au$tralian Pi Dalbergia$is$oo (Rosewood) Albizzia lebbeck Bishofia javanic Enterolobium Ficus spp. (Non- Sapium sebifrum Melia azeda Fifty (50) percent an ten (10) trees are required to be planted to meet the requirement$ , a mix of species shall be provided. The minimum number of species anted are indicated in Table 7-30. When a mix of species is required, no Ie species shall exceed a 2 to 1 ratio relative to all other individual species. TABLE 7·30 --- ------ -- --- for is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 25 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 Required Number Of Tr~e$ Minimum Number Of Species 11-20 2 21-30 31-40 41+ fih At ICEIst 50% One hundred 1 species such as Live Oaks (Que slash pine (Pinus elliotti), or other and Drought-Tolerant Vegetation. be exempted by the Community of the canopy or shade trees described in Section 7.09.04(6 Director shall require m the loss of any canopy Lh No tree shall be p power lines. Lar planted no clo power line. off-set at I trees ( a height, conflict with overhead ht of 30 feet or more) shall be 30 feet from the nearest overhead eheight between 20 - 30 feet) shall be the nearest overhead power line. Small tnan20feet) shall not be required to meet ,regardless of size shall be planted within five utility pole, guy wire, pad mounted electrical srnissionl collection structure or equipment. 'mum mature høight grøat ønough to interfere with overhead antødbelowoverhead power lines and shall be located a ne half(2 1/2) feet, plus the average mature frond length, y utility right-of-way. The Community Development Director, in ith Florida Power and Light Company, shall maintain a list trees nd in the South Florida area that at mature growth heights can bly be expected to interfere with overhead power lines, (Insert Figure 7-30) ---- ----- -i; -~d~ti~--------- is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 26 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 3. Shrubs and Hedges Shrubs shall be a minimum of eighteen (18) twenty four (24) inches in height above grade immediately after planting. Hedges, where required, shall be planted and maintained so as to form a t"vvo (2) foot thirty (30) inch or higher continuous, unbroken, solid visual screen within 8 maximum of one (1) year after the time of planting. 4. Vines Vines shall be a minimum of twelve (12) inches' be used in conjunction with fences, screens, 5. Ground Covers . Ground covers, other than grass, shallbep appearance and reasonably complete coy 6. Lawn Grass Grass areas shall be planted in s County. Grass areas may be shall be used in swales or ot protective measures shall t lawns in S1. Lucie , except that solid sod other than solid sod is used, is achieved. 7. Native Vegetation preserves the existing vegetation, no additional ate screening is provided. The Community Development reserv.ednative ve etation meets the intent of this Code. artificial turf shall not be used in lieu of the plant requirements in this Code. etic or artificial material in the form of trees, shrubs, ground covers, or vines shall not used in lieu of the plant requirements in this Code. ---------- CtríJec Throllgh ís for deletíon ís change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meetíng Ordínance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 27 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 7.09.04 GENERAL LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS A. REQUIRED LANDSCAPING RIGHTS-OF-WAY The area between-wReft any buildinQ, off-street p right-of-way, the Brea shall be designed and landsca 1. A strip of land at least fifteen (15) feet in d or road right-of-way and-flìe off-s include one (1) tree for each thirty thereof. en the abutting street I be landscaped to f-way or major fraction In addition, a hedge, wall interior perimeter of-tfte 'er shall be placed along the 2. -street parking or other vehicular use area strip shall be landscaped with at least grass or the public right-of-way through all such landscaping shall be use parking or other vehicular use areas. earthen berms may be used in conjunction with the planting of ovided that the Intent of the visual barrier created by the hedge is slope ratios for all earthen berms shall be no greater than 3:1. --------- - - - a'ddItlon-- ------ GtriJcc Through is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 28 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ..... surface facìne¡ the street or road rie¡ht-of-way. Fie¡ure 7-31 e¡enerallv depicts the placement of a fence or wall alone¡ a public or private streetriQht-of-wav. Pedestrian and vehicular access throuqh any wall or fence are permitted, however the wall or fence shall be places so that adequate siqht distance at any vehlcularor pedestrian access is maintained. It shall be the responsibility of the property owner to maintain alllandscapinq alonq the outside edc¡e of any fence or wall consistent with the requirements ofthis Code. (Insert fiqure 7-31) B. PERIMETER LANDSCAPING RELATING TO AB 1. When an off-street parking ar~a or other v an intervening building or structure from screened shall be provided with a I Such landscaped buffer shall be landscape barrier not less than six ( planting to form a continuous scree use area and such abutting p common lot line and the off 2. thirty (30) linear feet or major fraction 3. be us.ed in conjunction with the planting of the vi$ual barrier created by the hedge is I earthen berms shall be no greater than 3: 1 . TERIOR LANDSCAPING rface parking and other vehicular use areas shall have at least one (1) square foot of ------ --- for addition is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 29 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 -- .... ........ interior landscaping for each eighteen (18) square feet or major fraction thereof of off-street parking and vehicular use area. Each separate landscaped area shall contain a minimum of one hundred eighty (180) square fe~t.and shall have a minimum width of at least ten (10) feet and shall include at least one (1) tree with the remaining area adequately landscaped with shrubs, ground cover, or other authorized landscaping material not to exceed three (3) feet in height. 2. The front of a vehicle may not encroach u of the required depth of each parking in extra grass or ground cover provided th 3. Terminal Landscape Islands Each row of parking stalls shal measure no less than ten (10 one tree shall be provided f scaped island which shall (15) feet in length. At least 4. Interior Landscape Ar mittedin a continuous row without being hundred eighty (180) square feet for a for a double row of parking. Each interior width of ten (10) feet. and int~rior landscap~d ar~as shall be surrounded with a urbin aCGord~nGe with the specifications for public works identified in Chapter 13 of this Code. Lot Median Landscaping ear landscape median between two abutting rows of parking may be used to isty, in part, the requirements of this Section relative to interior landscaping. Terminal islands are required as described in Section 7.09.04(C)(3). ~ 8. landscaped parking lot median must be a minimum of five eiç¡ht (8) feet in ---- - - -~d~ti~--------- Ctrikc Through is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 30 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 -- - width and provide for the planting of at least one tree for every thirty linear feet of median lenqth or fraction thereof. All parking lot median landscaped areas shall be protected with a continuous, raised, non mountable curb or through the provision e¥ curb stops in accordance with the specifications for public works of S1. Lucie County as identified in Chapter 13 of this Code. D. VISIBILITY FOR LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO THE PUBLIC RIGHT ACCESS When an accessway intersects a public right-of-wa intersection of two (2) or more public rights- described below shall provide unobstructed cross- (6) feet, provided, however, trees or palms having no limbs or foliage extend into the cross-visibility a so as not to create a traffic hazard. Landscaping, be located closer than three (3) feet from the edge 0 referred to above are: 1. The areas of property on both sides of the accessway and the publi fifteen (15) feet in length from connecting the ends of the tw tersection of each side of each triangle being e third side being a line 2. The area of property locat rights-of-way with two abutting public righ being a line conne tion of two (2) or more public thirty (30) feet in length along the eir point of intersection, and the third side (2) lines. E. ESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES ial and residenthal uses shaH be landscaped with a fence, wall~ other durable landscaped barrier of at least six (6) feet in the Uses. <In addition, one (1) tree shall be provided raction thereof of buffer area. ---------- -i;f~~d~tioo--- ----- is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 31 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 --- --- adequate siqht distance at the pedestrian acceSS is maintained. It shaH be the responsibility of the property owner to maintain aH landscapinq alom:¡ the outside edQe of any fence or wall consistent with the requirements of this Code. F. OFF-STREET LOADING SPACES AND WASTE RECEPTACLES All off-street loading spaces and waste receptacles shaH be fully scre by a uniformly colored, solid visual and auditory barrier of notless t densely planted landscape screen consisting of (4) feet in height when planted and that can b ~ one ( 1 ) years. The screening shaH extend as required for ingress and egress; however, there sh space within the screen. G. EXISTING OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING 4-: When an off-street parking or loading lot such off-street parking lot is enlargedinar new, shall comply with this Code. H. LANDSCAPING AND SCREE PREVENTERS 1. landscape and screen backflow preventers. rshaUbe place.d around the backflow prevention device, to aCElotpropertie.s. All shrubs or hedges shall be a minimum gradE¡l imme.diately after planting, and shall be planted and four (4) foot or higher continuous, unbroken, solid visual screen r the time of planting. I. MENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES OF THREE OR FEWER esidential structure containing one (1), two (2), or three (3) units must preserve or e (1) tree for every 2,50QsC uare feet of the subject lot or parcel of land, up to a mum planting of 17 trees per lot ()r parcel. On any lot or parcel greater than one acre in rea, the provisions of Section 6.00.00, Vegetation Protection and Preservation, shall be -- ------- ---------- is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 32 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 -- --- complied with. 2. All trees preserved or planted in order to møet this landscaping requirement shall meet the standards of Section 7.09.03(C)(2) of this Code. 3. At Icest 50% Onø hundred ( 100%) percent of thø planted trees shall consis such as Live Oaks (Quercus virginiana), Laurel Oaks (Querc elliotti), or other species listed in Section 7.09.06 C)(2)(d), Vegetation. J. LANDSCAPING REQUIREME.NTS FOR USED FOR THE P OR ORNAMENTAL PLANTS OR TREES IN 1, 3. from the re uirements of this nt Director that the roduction of food· animals land or water ---------- -------- - for is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 33 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ---~ K. OFF-STREET SITE LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS & GENERAL DESIGN STANDARDS General Requirements feet from the uch fixtures or hazardous within 75 feet from the ht of the buffer wall. fixtures within 25 feet from the ublic streets hei· hi of all outdoor Ii ht fixtures within 25 feet from the or not to extend above the her ht of the buffer wall. ------ P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99 00lb Draft #3 Page 34 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 -~ -- ~ 4. Ground mounted flood and spotliQhts, if used. shall be placed on standards pointinQ toward the buildinQ or wall and positioned so astopreventHghtfrom QlarinQ onto residential areas, rather than the buildinQs or walls and directed outward which creates dark shadows adjacent to the buildinQs. 5. 6. used or zoned for a residential of notification. 7. 8. of Section 6.04.02 Sea stricter to the two owered to determine the d-:-1: F THIS SECTION based upon a showing by the applicant for ofthese regulations will not meet the general a result traffic patterns, drainage or other issues of lendsqape scheme in accordance with the provisions of this ed as an elternative shall be designed in such a manner that unt of material provided equal at least one and one half (1 inally required. ******************************** TING PROVISIONS. lorida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this -- ------- is CtriJcc Through is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 35 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 - .....-.- ~ ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be un inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held be in property, or circumstance, such holding shall nota pli property, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE, This ordinance shall be applicable throughout St. PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT The Clerk be and is hereby directed forth the Bureau of Administrative Code Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART F. mmissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner Doug Coward -------- BtriJcc Through is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 f this ordinance to State, The Capitol, xxx xxx xxx xxx - ----- - Page 36 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 - --- ~ Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX PART H. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Lucie Cou Compiled Laws, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to " appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance m re accomplish such intention; provided, however, that p hro PASSED AND DULY ENACTED this xxth day of ATTEST: DEPUTY CLERK ROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: ATTORNEY ----- ---------- --- is addition CtriJcc Through is for deletion is change from 10/15/98 P&Z/LPA meeting Ordinance #99-001b Draft #3 Page 37 PRINT DATE: 12/23/98 , - ~ ~ 'tV '-' ....., ITEM NO, SA AGENDA REOUEST DATE: JANUARY S, 1999 REGULAR [XX ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ADMINISTRATION DOUG ANDERSON SUBJECT: CITY OF FT, PIERCE REQUEST FOR FUNDING - AVENUE D BACKGROUND: SEE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM FUNDS AVAIL. (State type & No. of transaction or N/A): NONE AT THIS TIME PREVIOUS ACTION: SEE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM RECOMMENDATION: STAFF IS LOOKING FOR BOARD DIRECTION REGARDING THE CI~ OF FT. PIERCE'S ADDITIONAL $572,430 REQUEST FOR FUNDING FOR AVENUE D IMPROVEMENTS. ~~ APPROVED OTHER: [ ] DENIED ReAgenda for January 12, 1999. Staff to discuss in the interim. COMMISSION ACTION: D UG S M. ANDERSON Co ty Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 ~ ~ '....,I SA- MEMORANDUM TO: BOARD OF COUNT IONERS FROM: DOUG ANDERSON DATE: DECEMBER 30, 1998 SUBJECT: AVENUE D FUNDING REQUEST ================================================================= On December 3, 1998 the County received a request from the City of Ft. Pierce for additional funding for the Avenue D Corridor reconstruction. The amount of this request is $572,430.00. This is 50% of the increased cost of the project. In 1997 the County contributed $60,000 towards 50% of the design cost of this project. The County also agreed to fund 50% of the estimated construction cost which totaled $750,000 for the County's share. The County budgeted $500,000 in 1998. This amount was carried over to the 1999 budget year. In the 1999 budget the additional $250,000 was budgeted. Once this is paid to the City, the County will have $810,000 invested in this project. There is no unallocated money available in this year's budget. The additional $572,430 would have to be appropriated in the County's 2000 budget if the Board approves this additional funding request or eliminate road projects budgeted for this year. This money comes out of the County's Transportation Trust Fund which is used for road and bridge projects, Don West has prepared a report dated December 28, 1998 listing the County's unfunded capital road and bridge needs. These unfunded needs total $43,600,000 and will be discussed at our January 28 Strategic Planning Session. I had asked Julia Shewchuk to determine if the County could apply for a Community Development Block Grant to help fund this project. We are not eligible for grant money for this project as explained in Julia's memorandum of December 22, 1998. County staff is looking for Board direction regarding the City of Ft. Pierce's additional funding request for this project. C: Don West, Interim Public Works Director Harvey Lincoln, Management and Budget Manager Julia Shewchuk, Economic Development Manager Ray Wazny, Community Development Director Phil Freeland, Assistant County Administrator Dan McIntyre, County Attorney - - 12-23-199a 9:21AM FRf\l4 CITY ATTY/CITY MGR 4.07 4.66 549':> '-" P. 1 ~ ....., ~ ITY Df RT PIERC~ toriJa ~u N ~ ~ \ I.;' ~ "'-. '" .. '" ...., OFFICE OF THE MAYOR AND CITY CO~ MISSION CITV HALL, 100 NORTH U.S. 1 P.O. BOX 1480 FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34954-M80 n:t.. (531) ~2200 FA;-: (f·,51) 461S-5492 December 3. 1998 The Honorable Paula Lewis CotJQnissìoner St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia A venue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Dear Paula: In December of 1996 the City and County entered into an agreement for the recom,ll'UC tion of the Avenue D COlTidor. As you may recall. the project iDcludes a complete reconstruction of streets. sidewalks and utilities from U, S, 1 lo 25th Street. You are aware that the reason fœ :thc: Intcrlocal AgrœJ'I1ent is that Avenue D is a Counry mad. The City has a¡reed to accept it as a City road upon completion of improvements. In other Avenue D investments. the City of Fort Pierc.~ Î.lì funding a $500,000.00 Police substatíon at Means Court, a.od the Fire Department is În ':be )tocess of constructing a $1 miUiQn tile station at the:: corner of 8th and A venue D. A, we have experien.c:ed in downtown Fort Pierce. public investment is having a trern (;nc),:)us impact on the willingness of the private se(:tor to invest. The recently completed Public De6::nd.;::rs Office., the LiOOuy, our street .reconstru.ction. the Marina investment and many others have cre;dcd a. renewed spirit of pride and entbusiasm in CoDr community that was absent for many years. . Thi.-:. is being accomplished largely through designing exceptional quality into our public projf~ct¡¡. We are committed to the concept that q,,"dity of design and construction will int1~nçe prlV!l1:~ 11\Vestment. With that in mind the Avenue "D" corridor improvements were designed to include ma:t1y hardscape features. Tht cost of those feature:; have taken the price beyond our original estim!lt:es. In the original Inter local the City and County agreed to a 50-SO split of the constructîcm C(lst with the County placing a limitation of$750,(00.00 on their share oftbc project to be paid S2~;O.()( O per year for 3 years. - - 12-23-1998 9:22AM FR0"4 CITY A TTY /C ITY MGR 4.07 4.66 549':> '-' ......" P.2 ..., The Honorable Paula Lewis December 3. 1998 Page 2 ., ..... The purpose oftbis correspondence into ask that the County Commission recoostder tbe amount of fu.nds that: they will pay toward the reconstruction of A venue'" DU. Based. on the final bid. the cost:. excmding utility relocatÎOD~ is $2.644.860.00. Utility relocation costs are in excess of ~i85:tOOO.OO. Please consider tbis as a fbnnal request of the County to appropriate the necessary resC¡Uf<: es to p~y one halfoftbe $2.644~860.00 that Í!io the currently known amount of the project. The effcct would increase the County's contribution &om $7S0~OOO.OO to $t.32~430.00 or at. inu'cuc of $572.430.00. We are wilting to accept whatever an-angement that may be woIb.blc for the County to absorb this type of expenditure ovez whatever p;riod of time the CouDf¥ Commission feels is applDIHiate. I recognize that tW$ request is significant. however, I encourage YQU to consider 'the j~oals and objectives oftbis project and the return that our entire County will experience with th.: eliminatioo. of the blighted conditions of Avenue '"D". EOE/btp cc: Members of Saint Lucie Coonty Commission MembersofFon. Pierce City Commission Douglas M. Anderson. Administrator, Saint Lucie County Hector P. Arias. City Engineer Ramon Trias, Director of Planning - , '-' "'-" DIVISION OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM 98-445 ~~ -~ -.. -~ -- -.. -..-.. -- -.. -.. -.. -..-.. -.. ---.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -..-.. -.. -.. -.. ---.. -.... -.. -.. -.. -.. -.. -- -- -.. -.. -- -- -- -- --.. ~:-t-:-t..»~~~~~~~:-:--~:--~~=----~:-.;::-:-:..~x:-:-:-:,,~~:-:,,:--:~~:-:,,:-:-:-:-:-:--:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:--:-:-:-:-:-:--:-:-:-:,,:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-:-: :;':~--=--=~~-:-:--::-:~~~~--2--::--::--::--::~--::--::~--::--::--::~"'¿-:--:--:;":--::-:--:-:--:-:--:",:-:-:--:-:--:-:-:-:--:-:--:-:--:-:--:-:--:-:--:-:;-;::-:--:~___-:,,:-:--:-:--:-:--:--:--:-: .._........_..-:...-..-:...__-:...__......-.......................-:...-.."'\.,,-..."'1.,,-.................-.."'--..-:..-.."1.,-..................-..-:...__"'-__--:...-.......-..-:..-.......-...-,."__-:...-..-:...__""-__"1."-..-:..-....................................""-..."",__"'--.......-........-...."",__"\.,,-..............-:...-....................-........-...,,,,,-.."'1.,,-........_.."'!., TO: Doug Anderson, County Administrator FROM: Don West, County Engine~\1I DATE: December 28, 1998 r-- i iõ) r Œ Œ [~ n W~ rñì 1 ~ n . ' f 'j IU .2891 SUBJECT: Capital Road and Bridge Needs L_L co~-_~~-'~~ We have made good progress in recent years in upscaling our capital maintenance program for road and bridge infrastructure repair and replacement. The "Investment for the Future" program, adopted by the Board of County Commissioners in June 1997, has been highly successful and is making a real difference. However, our capital needs for infrastructure repair and replacement are many. Because of our large inventory of roads, sufficient funds are not available from present sources of revenue to address many of our infrastructure needs. The County maintains 350 miles of paved roadways and 175 miles of dirtlshellrock unimproved roads. Presently, we have a substantial amount of paved road that has gone beyond the salvage point and must be reconstructed. We also have a substantial amount of sub-standard one lane paved roads that should be upgraded to two lane facilities. Attached is a list of identified roadway reconstruction needs that are currently unfunded. The attached list identifies $13.1 million of paved roadway that will need to be reconstructed or widened to two lanes. Dirtlshellrock roadways that are unimproved will require drainage improvements before they can be paved. Paving and drainage improvements for a two lane dirt roadway costs approximately $600,000 per mile for a rural-type road design with swale drainage. At present, the MSBU program is the only method we have available to fund these types of improvements. The cost of widening a roadway to four lanes is much greater because of the necessary curbing and piped drainage system. The cost of constructing a widened roadway is about $1.0 million dollars per mile for each additional lane. '-' ....., Current revenue sources collected from gasoline taxes and road impact fees are insufficient to fund roadway widening projects that would increase the capacity of our major arterials. Failure to make these necessary improvements will cause a breakdown in the level of service capabilities of the major roadway network. The economic well-being of the community then becomes at risk if the State mandated concurrency regulations are enforced. This could effectively stop any growth or expansion of new development in areas bordering the major arterial roadways. For example, both Midway Road (U.S. 1 to 25th Street) and South 25th Street (Midway to Edwards Road) are very close to meeting a breakdown in the level of service that could require deferral of new development permits. Traffic count data shows both segments of roadway to be very close to capacity now. Attached is a listing of identified road widening needs that totals $43.6 million dollars. All of the projects listed are identified in the County Comprehensive Growth Management Plan as needed arterial roadways. At present, gasoline tax revenues are being spent on infrastructure capital maintenance, including repair and replacement of existing facilities. Road impact fees that are intended for widening projects only amount to about $1 million dollars per year. The Midway Road and South 25th Street projects total $12.8 million in construction costs. In conclusion, we are making good progress in our capital maintenance program for our existing infrastructure. Many needs are still unmet because of the large inventory of roads and bridges that fall within the unincorporated County jurisdiction for maintenance. Revenues still fall short in the area of road reconstruction and road widening. Likewise, there are no revenue sources available to address improvement of dirtlshellrock roadways. However, the MSBU program has been highly successful, and it provides a method for citizens to receive additional improvements, if they are willing to pay additional fees. OBW:jr Attachments cc: Harvey Lincoln, Management & Budget Manager C/) W ~ ::¡ õ W~ I-(!) <0 0...1 0.::-:: ::»0 :2E< ~~ (!)C/) 00 o::lli D.z : Z Wo 0::_ ::»1- 1-0 ::»::» Ll.o:: WI- :I:C/) I-Z 0::0 00 Ll.W 1-0:: z>- ~~ 1-0 C/)< Wo >0:: ~o . W o Z ::» LI. Z ::» o W 1-1- <C/) :2E0 ~o C/) W :I:_ 1-111 (!) CII Z= w:2E ...1- '-' ~ 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 00000000000000000000000000 -~~~~~~~~~~~~cicicicici~~~~~cici~ci ~~~~~~~~~~~~~OOOØOOMØNO~N~ N~~~~~~~~~~~M~~~N~~0~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~Ñ~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ØMM~~~ ~~ ~ . . . . . . . . . . '~NN~ . . . .NM~ . .~ ci00000000000 ooo0ci~ o~ Q) Q) . .... .cOO ~~~~~~~~~~~ oo~ ~~O~ cncncncncncncncncncncn ~~~~~ ~~£~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~cnæw omiø~cncn - MMMMMMMMMMMCcn'cn'O>ø ->~ cn~~ ~MMMMMMMMMMMW -c::( ~Q» .2 .~~ = ···········OOOC O.þ>OOQ)=>WW ~~ZZZZZZZZZZZ_--Q)III-_~--~ . »OOOOOOOOOOO~~~~È~üO~~cZ.2.2 c::(----------->mmm-~otmCQ)O . OO~~~~~~~~~~~m~~(!)Ü~->~Q)c::(>-~ø _cncncncncncncncncncncn o~t~ > ~~ = -----------Q)~~~-....Q)~~~c::(Q)cn·O~ =rJ rJ rJ rJ rJ rJ rJ rJ rJ rJ rJ rJ mm_~ CCmrJ C) æ ~~;;;;;;;;;;;~~~§ø~~~~2~~~~ > > . . . . . . . . . . . ~ .-.- 0 . 0 _ ~ .- :!::.... . m 0 c::(zzzzzzzzzzzcn~~ü=>(!)O~~üOZ~I ~ ~ m Q) m ~-g 2 >2 .- 0 Q) ~ Q) .¡:: ~ ð 0:: ~ Q) ~ Q) .~ 0 m _ ,.. ~ C C).... 'oJ Q)Q) -=========~Q)ocQ)Q)~OQ)tcm Q) ~""~~~~~~~P~~~~g~0::~~~æ~ê~8~~~ w ~Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)~c~c::(""cnt~~O::t....ðo , ~êêêêêêêêêêêæQ)mrJ ~t~~c::(~~ð~~ o MQ)Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)Q)~~2Q)0~~E~mNot 0:: . . > > > > > > > > > > > .... _ :!:: m ~ 0 ._ _ Q) 0.: ~ 0. Zc::(c::(c::(c::(c::(c::(c::(c::(c::(c::(c::«!)W~ücncn(!)O::W~Il-m~ o o o Ø ~ ~ M ~ ~ "'1:1: en N ~ - - ......... '-" ....,¿ o o 0_ o I'- CO N T"" ~ o 0 o 0 O. 0 o 0 M M M m M CD ~ V ~ 00 0000000 00000 00 0000000 00000 0.0. 0000000 0_ O. O. O. O. en 0 00 6666666 en 0 01.01.000 W vM ooooomv W W 1.0 V M 1.0 1.0 W 1-1- T""_ 1'-. OMMCDNI'-I.O ¡::: ~~ vOT""MM ¡::: «en 1.0 I'- "":Ñ.ñ....:rtirtirti ::::¡ ~....:....:~~ W::::¡ :20 ~~ ~~~T"" ~~~ :20 ~~ ~ Õ 1-- ¡:::ü ¡:::ü <cO en <C en 0<C w LL w D.LL C> :JC> 0 :=g -J ~ ë2~ -J ° <C C)<C w m om >w - 0::- Wü en D.~ -J - 0 I-~ Wüü~~~ü W : W Zw LLü W Ww ZZZ Z O::z wen ~C> a:::LL C) a::: 0 z :Jz ::> Z LL- ü Z W 0) WW 0 ..c: J:O ~ - ~~ "C c:: Z 0) "U "C 0> 0 IV 0) ::~ - -- ¡::: IV "U E c:: 0) z c:: m-- ° .a zo EO)I/) W :I we:( a.. ~~~ 0) en c .c :=0 0) m 0:: IV ~~ ~.s ~ 1-0:: ... > _~ ."U W E '§ eno mD:: c:: O)W I- IV Ww c:: o(§» Z II > ... - c::c::::: «.s-c: E 0 >0 >- II 0 I/) ui ~z -m 0) 0) mT"" 0) >-m "U Co "U :E~ -7esenO)mE I/) W "U 0) .§ 0) 0) ~ I.O"U C::C)0::>c::~... "U 0 m 0) "U::I N .- 0) Z c:: c:: LL 0) _ m"UC1I C1I Z 0 z 0:2 C1I 0 0'" .- t: "U a::: "C .a~ -' ... - m - 0 :2 .- Z :J m~"UC1I 0) IV :J I/) C)"U I/) c::--~ 0) LL c:: .... >-C1I T"" "U 0;:: m - ... Z en ... C1Iæ~.sc::c::.s c .. Z T""&omC1l ãi - m . a::::;) .c 0) C::O) 0 ::> ~ 0) C .¡:: (ij .~.~ I/) ï:: 0 en.t);;-,a::: ~ "U 0:: C1I c:: C1I ... "- ¡::: -"U mc::m~l/)l/)"U ¡::: ~ ...- -:w =C1I:2 c::c::... "U ::>.:; m .t) :5 ~ ::I.!!! a.. 5¿-_22m ~ a.. - ~.- m (,) >< æ ..c:- ----><><~ æ oðO)"U~C1I c:: 'ü C1I 0) a..-: -- . ,wW"U >- "U en .- 0) S 0 m "'0) :¡:¡ Co Ü "U..c: .,¿.,¿¡t¡t"U"U!:!:!- m Ü l"'Ioð:2en (,) m c:: en ma.. ~ en &"Uoðoðoð 0) m 1/)'- a..a.."U"U ~ m . ° - I/) W 0_ "U W I/) (,) ::I 0 a::: 0) "U"Umma:::°O) m 0 O)~"U"U-g ... U .~~ mmoo a:::~ 0) >-e 0 O)a:::~~o - !E I- m- ooa:::a:::êê... a::: I- -el/)a:::a:::a::: .f: ~ e m ü ~en a::: a::: "U "U '-.- 0) (ij ü (ij Q.O) W c::c::......~~"U W O)"UI/)I/)>- I- 0) >- ~:5 - :5æO)O)m - ï o 0 m m c:: c:: c:: 0 ï 0 1/)1.0 0 :21.0 __c::c::O)O)m I- 0 m~"U"U~ I- ß 0)- a::: N (ij(ijc::c::ïïO) a::: 0) mm"U ..c:>< S:uj SS~~ZujÔ si:Baa~ 0 I- 0) a.. D.. I- .. c:: (/) c:: w Z o (/) (/) :E :E 0.... Oz ~~z~o Z....:3w ::>~Q.ri 0a....J0:: OUJ~Q. u.Cii:~ 0~ë3~ 00:::0::1- c::oi5~ ~;:>Á. Oo~~ m:J¡të2 ~~ I- Za.. => o o w o ::> ..J ;-: en 1--' 0< WI- -.0 .0 I- 0:: 0.. (f)M 0::8 i1jN >- ^ . -' 0::< >-1- ~g ¡¡: 8Z ~ gz ~ ~z o~ 8Z ~ g¡ël ~õ I- g¡" >-~ LLZ '0:: ~~ ð ä:tü ~8 ::> cD -,I- <0 I-W - -. 0..0 ðg: W z.. ::; .. §O~p,¡$!t()~ ;;NðùS8", >it~~<:iri~ Ì1ÍNðCl>ì1S80> f&) ¿ o:i .. ....: - §NOMØ)r-2- C"')r-Na)'q'" .......M-v >iÑ:::'g;!'~g ~:S.co.-CI>-::::, - - ~ § 8 N "'IC',........ N N:ï:¡~8:;:g çi....:..Ñ"'-O>Ñ x.8.~.~~;::ê. ~ - - §8°8~~~ v~....¡»v'" >io~g:5f~g ~~ co. - CI> -::::. - - - §§§§§~~ >io..:gcDO>"'; x.g.:R.-o;;::~ - - - §§§~§~~ ~~~~§'~; - - - '-" .. ~~ ~.: '<Ifr. :Rd¡ ....:,...: CI> .... .... 0>- :R. - N .... n 0>- '" n - m v .... 8 ~ N .... - g:ï:¡ 0> .... r-- «tr- :Rd¡ .,,-- ,....~ g ~ ~ :g v ri v .... <6 CI> .... .... 0> n v co· N .... n 8" .,.; m or .... o - - ",- .... '" N v· co '<T. - §§§§ g~~8 ~MoM~ - §§§§ ~~~~ § § ~~ N N § ~- M §§§§ 8888 ..... ..... ...... ('of § ~ ........ "-I . . ...... '" ..... . I o .u..~:...: 11 1·111··1"'1"·:~":'. t ... .,; C> .... ~ .., t; :! .. ..: ~ .. ..; .. ... c> .. ... .... ... ..; .. ... ".: § 8" ~ § ...- ; ".: ... ~ ..- ~ OÒ "" -~ ~S:51~"W~·1.u~~:':':'~::':':;'1;;¡(."""·"'Ø""'''':,~~:'''''~·~''''n~"m'n1Q~"""-"~:""u ~»;::,..~:;.x;.:;.~);Y}:;~;;~~:;$,.~:::'> 7M ...... .... §§§~§~~ ~~~~§';:-; - - - §§§§§~ g~8-~~Ñ O>O>V_'"':....~ - - ~ I- u¡ < (f)C> WI- WZ LLW 1-0 0- <;:: o..z ::!E- _Z u¡ I- Z U! :nO I-N Z-' ~8 ~"'< I- u¡ < C> -' ~ o >= ::> I- >= u¡ z 8 å W õ@ ill ~º ::> ~~u¡@ illg: :;;:;;ÕI1i ~ill «>=0:: ::>0:: C>C>~~wa:a: ~~8:;:§?~~ ~~oðO:5>->- ~~~~~1212 ggZ,,",o« ~èiSzOO -'-'C>~~ § 8" v ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ......- ,....- oi 8 CD .,.; V co ~ "" N N ..... n v cD w ::> Z ~ 0:: W -' cD :5 ~ < -' < I- o I- §§§§ 8888 ..... .,... .,... N CI) w 0:: :;) l- E z W Q. X W ~ ~ Z 0:: W ~ ~~ I- :?;ð g ~C> a o::w>- II: wwg: ==~~~!:!. ffi~~~~ itl05~i1jffi i>~w~Q fltl:oð~ !~~~~ ..JW(f)>-(f) <:X:w<::> !::~o~o:: ~w:5Qt: O~C>::!EO § g n Ñ §~o~§O§;ï;§ N-N ;ï; .... ~~~¡;f"'.~g:R>i n_co_;:!;._", x r-.. _- tri ....: -- 6 ...- ... .., ... .., .. .. ...- ... ... ..; .. ~ :;> .. oò It: ~ ~ It: It: ~ . ~ ~ o ... ~ .., §§§§§§ ¡~~~~~- u:i1Ò~~-:ÑM~ §§§§§§ ¡~~§-~~ vi ri ::.. -.. Ñ M 8 ò ,.., .... ò ,.., § ~ .... ~ o o C> o o o ~~""··"·-111""::; o CD .... .... !i 01) ... o &&I a II: a.. ~ i1j ~ ::> o ¡r ~~~ -02:~ u¡O::o::Z ê::>~Z~ ~gm~ffi 0°-'01- I-O::O....!:: -,zl-o~ w~~mo::g -'oël~~¡g ~I-?c>mo:: <5=~¿< O-'w-=~ r-:D ww15 >-uJ~(f)~!!!. <£!:.¡f~iE~ ~DOOO< ::!E 0::0:: 0:: a:: 0:: ;;;OOzz~ Z 0:: 0:: 00 52~;¿SS~ ZZZ«~ ~~~~~o o . t Ii II: i3 ~ ::I o ~ I- o ~ ::I 10 N cD ~ èij :.: 0:: o ~ i o 6 ~~~N~~~~~~~~~M~~~~~~~~~~~~;~~~~~~ ...- N M "'¢' \t) co r- G) m ~ :: ~ ~ _::!: ~ co. r- § ~ § ~ '" v- n .... '" Ñ :8 Ñ ~ § ~ §~o~§O§;ï;§ N-CD ;ï; .... ~!£~szf.,.;;ï;.·g:R>i MCÒCD?)~-'" X Ñ":Ñ_-": - N .... CD n- - N. - § ~ § ~ § ~- n §§ ~. §~ § ~ §~o.....§~§;ï;§ N-8 n .... ~t~~~-~·~·:R~ - -- § ~ §....N :; ~ ~ 0> co· ....;::~ § § 8g N N - §~;:¡;~§O§;ï;§ NCDO ;ï; .... ~g~~-8~R:R>i MNr-. ~...-?) ?S - §t()O>"'§O§"'§ r-t,()- -q- r-- __an C» N "';o>-<6v-"';~RcD>i ~~~co~...-&r)mt2S ri ~ z . a: III > o >- II: II: ~ ):"- . <ffi ~ ~~ o --. III :::!EI- 0:: ~ ~~ ~ u¡~ Loo::< :?;o::>-- <è(~~NWZo.. ~~~~~t:>!Z~~(f) III W::!EN -~/i)1- ~ffi~=.:.irl~og~ >I---U¡U¡~O::"'~ OZWW-;oð o..¿"" II:WU¡(f)::"o_::!E - a..o:$~oo:::::!E-~:x:" !:x:¡tCLo::u¡oðb-,1- o 0' cD.... ~o::t;;t;;~o::[ßwo~ t:i1j",,,,~~ož81- ~illN8ºi'5:5~Q;¡§ oO::~(f)::!EwC>«z a II: L L I L < o ..J < I- o I- M ::> 10 Q; <> .., ::> -9 .........- '-' ...., DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (Economic Development Division) MEMORANDUM TO: Doug Anderson County A,~l1)inistrator~, / /. ,/' FROM: ~~~~~~~~P:::::~~~- DATE: December 22, 1998 SUBJECT: Community Development Block Grant - Commercial Revitalization We did check with our consultant wether the Avenue D project would qualify as a St. Lucie County Commercial Revitalization project in order to apply for the appropriate grant. The project however does not qualify, because it is within the City limits of Ft. Pierce which in itself is a CDBG entitlement community. Ft. Pierce receives an annual allocation of CDBG funds whereas the County's have to be obtained on a competitive basis. Funds obtained on a competitive basis are not allowed to be spent within the boundaries of an entitlement community in order to avoid "double-dipping".. Please let me know if there is any other information that you may need, or if you have any questions. Cc: Ray Wazny Phil Freeland . _ ~.~_..~~- ._-~ -----._------ --.-.---- ..- [' rí" [' n IV] Ii'· n \ ¡ ~ llrJ -~~ Ii --\:L.J2, \' lJ I . CI ". ! d' IS 221118 I L l_------, ,. - - -- -.--..,.-.- r· , . ',.-t: - ........... _., . """~""""">""<X'~"t;e;":J~~r~~?i"""' .,. œ Œ~ \0, ~/' ill ~. r' <' ..... ~ .....,. . . . AMENDED AND RESTATED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT IMPROVEMENT OF AVENUE uD" ENGINEERING ,,~ THIS ~GREEMENT dated this lID day of \)ec.e~eÁ . 1996. by and between CITY OF FORT PIERCE. a.Florida municipal corporation. hereinafter referred to as the "City" and ST. LUCIE COUNTY,. a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "County": . . WHEREAS, the City ~as offered to design and construct improvements to Avenue "D" (hereinafter referred to as the "Project"). WHEREAS, the County agrees to allow the City to design and construct the project subject to the terms of this Agreement; and. WHEREAS, the parties previously entered into an Interlocal Agreement on September 24. 1996 which the parties now desire to amend and restate. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED as follows: 1. General. This Agreement is entered into pursuant to Section 163.01. Florida Statutes. Florida Interlocal Cooperation Act. 2. Proiect DesiV1; Reimbursement. The City agrees to design the project By approving this Interlocal Agreement, the County· agrees to reimburse the City lOf fifty (50%) . . .. . .. ':: :"::'~-;.....:...t::~~¡.. .~:. :...:.., .:f~..":· ~·.==.>i')<. _:::"';"''--.' f..~~/:"!."".··/·: ..~. .- -: .~. . ; :·r- . ...: '~:":;'" . . ...:.. percent of the cost of designüig the proj ect in an amount not to exceed sixty. thousand and 0/100 ($60,000.00) dollars ucl.ess the project budget is increased as set out in Paragraph 5. The City - . agrees to complete the design oÍ thè project on or before May 31, 1997. g:\4gruntntûntaloclfp-4ve-d 1 ...-~ . '.' ". .-:" . ....~ ... ........ 4' . ·:;·:·.~~~~~;'t~~·).~·~" ·:~:·~~;;t7;·· ..:....:;.:.-~... -', ,.,,~.. V',. ....:,..{py. ", ....;..!-... '...,¡ r, 3. Review Plans Pr~pared by City. The plans, drawings and specifications prepared by the City for the project shall be subject to the review and approval of the County within thirty (30) days from receipt of pls.ns. Specifications for construction shall be in compliance with St Lucie County and State of Florida Departmen.t of Transportation Standards and Specifications and all other appropriate regulatory standards. The Çity agrees ·to provide a reproqucible copy of plåns and specifications for the project to the County. 4. Construction Fundin1!. After ·the project design and construction estimates are complete, the parties agree that the funding of the. construction of the project shall be fifty (50%) percent City, fifty (50%) percent County provided that the County's share of the construction funding shall not exceed seven hundred fifty thousand and 0/100 ($750,000.00) dollars payable .. . . in installments of two hundred fifty thousand and 0/100 ($250:000.00). dollars per year over a . - tlîree (3) year period beginning in Fiscal Year 1996-1997. The parties agree that all costs of utility relocation and reconstmction requireçl to construct the project shall be paid for by Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and shall not be included in the project costs· covered by this Agreement. 5. Contract Award and Administration. The City agrees that the award of the contract for the construction of the project is subject to the approval of the Board of County CommissionersOf' St. Lucie County, Florida, provided that the bids are IGSS thán the project budget as estima.úxl by the· City Manager and the County .AdmiIiistrator...The County shall nQtify. ., . the City within thirty ,(30) calendar days after receipt of the bids of the County's decision regarding the contract· for the project. In the event of bid award and approval of the contract. the parties agree that tþ.e City shall be the contracting agency and shall be responsiþle for g :lagr~= n t\Út(<:rloc\fp-av~"'¿ 2 - .....-- ~::'?:~:-"'~~.:-<::-!':-;-.':"{" :'.:'~:: -', '.. ~~::.~··:~;~:~:i~~~~~~~¥:~f~~;~~:-~:; :: ~... "'-' . .. ...., .....". .. ',_. . " . t~· .;... . . . .. administration of the contract The City shall perform the contract administration. In the event that field changes exceed the total budgeted amount, additional expenditures shall be subject to approval by the Board of County Commissioners and the City Commission. In processing requests for reimbursement, the City shall forward copies of all invoices received from the City's contractor in sufficient detail for audit purposes. The County shall in turn maké reimbursement to the City in the am.ütmt of fifty (50%) percent of the net invoice amount. 6. Construction Inspection. The parties agree that the City shall perform. the construction inspection of the project to determine whether the Contractor has properly constructed the project in accor.dance with the approved plans. The parties agree that the County may. at the County's optio~ perform incremental inspections during construction. The parties . . . agree that the City shall provide all construction inspection reports and shop drawings to the County. The City and the County shall provide a site representative with authority to authorize. - field changes. The parties a&ree that any field chang~ to the improvement plans shall be subject to the approval of the City and the County site representatives provided that the site representative shall-not have the authority to authorize field changes that would result in an increase to the project budget For the purpose. of this Agreement, construction inspec?-0n shall incÏude residentproject services. contract Q.dministratio~ engineering services during constructio~ utility coordinatioL and certification by all appropriate agencies. 7. Maintenance of Reconstructed Road. tTpon-coIilpletion of the construcµon of -:..:; ...... " ."... .. .' .. the project, the Part:ies agree that the City shall assume. maintenance responsibility for Av~nu~. D within the City limits. - g:lagramntlin/a-loclfp-aw:-å 3 - ---- ,. _." ¡... .'" .~ - ~ . '-" '-' 8. Indemnification - Hold Harmless. Subject to provisions of Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, the City agrees to indemnify and hold the County harmless from any liability or damages resulting from the permitting, construction (including but not limited to the roadway Construction. drainage construction, and utility relocation), and construction inspection of the project. ·The City agrees to require the Contractor to add the County as an additional named in::.llred on the insurance policies issued pursuant to thë Conirat:L 9. Amendment. This Agreement may only be amended by a written document signed by both parties and filed with the Clerk of. the Circuit Court of St Lucie County, Florida. 10. N onces. All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement snall be in writing (mcluding telex and telegraphic w . communication) and shalI be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier services, telecommunieated, or mailed (airmail if intemational) by registered ~r certified mail (postag~ prepai<i), r~turn receipt requested, addressed to: AS TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY: WITH A COpy TO: S1. Lucie County Administrator 2300· Virginia Avenue Administration Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 S1.- Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 AS TO CITY: WITH A COPY TO: Fort Pierce City Manager Post Office Box 1480 --- Fort Pierce, Florida E#4 ~4C\s4 Fort Pierce City Attorney .Post Office Box 1480 Fort Pierce, Florida ~3 454- ò~q54 or to such other ..address-as any party may designate by notice complying the terms of this - "Sectiop-. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered: (a) on the date delivered if by personal ,. delivery, (b) on the date telecommunicated if by telegraph, (c) on the date of transmission with & :to~rc~mntlin'aloc~v~-J 4 - -- . ; _ .~.4 ,-- . .. .~.. .. "w' ......., confirmed answer back if by telex, and (d) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. 1 L Terminarion. This Agreement may be terminated upon agreement by both parties. This Agreement shall automatica.Ily terniinat~ upon the failure of either party to agree to fund the constructiùn of me project. 12. Filin1!; Effective Date. This Agreement shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St Lucie County, Florida, prior to its effectiveness. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused the execution hereof by their duly authorized officials on the dates stated below. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA . . eputy tt~~: ~:.~., :.: J .~, ,.;'. ...., ..' !;¡ b C ~, . [~-:;/ .:":~ft~> .~ .,;: ,- 'I 6 ,,~.:;: >~,J : -4;]. ~~ .;; JI' "'-,f::."~ : "', ..1 Ù l,S",... : ~-:' ~ -; ..:,:.r~i:..,tt:f4?~: ~ ;.~ ~ "\.J¡':=-~~~~..4 ~ ..:':. . / ··..£vr. "'f. ,!'.... <::>'1:'_. "'" -t.'" -.-..-' 'fc'Y'g ~<j;:-.. ~/~ cúuu\<'~ ,,~~~ ~ j ByJj~ ß--ª~~1 C aIrman APPROVED AS TO -FORM AND C CfNESS: Mayor BY: ---¡\ TrEST: (~~~ ~ry »eputy Clerk BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECfNESS: BY:~, T ~~ City Attorney g:\agrumnrli....taÚJclfp-a.· "..¿ 5 ....... ~ ..... - .-- I \.f ....., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. .5ß DATE: 1/5/99 REGULAR [ xx] PUBLIC HEARING ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Administration Doug Anderson SUBJECT: District Medical Examiner BACKGROUND: The County has been contacted by the Medical Examiners Commission informing the Chair that the appointment term of the District Medical Examiner for District 19 will expire on July 1, 1999. The Medical Examiner Commission is asking for st. Lucie County's concurrence or non-concurrence to reappoint the current appointee, Dr. Frederick Hobin. The County also has the opportunity to suggest other nominees. Final selection will be made by the Governor. A response is requested by January 15, 1999. FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests determination of whether to recommend reappointment of the current Medical Examiner and/or other nominees for District Medical Examiner. APPROVED OTHER: [ ] DENIED Recommend re-appointment. SION ACTION: Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicableJ___ Eft. 5/96 -- -- .... - ~ .. LßtL - ~~J~m ~5. 6D FDLE Florida Department of Law Enforcement Medical Examiners Commission James T. "Tim" Moore Commissioner P.O. Box 1489 Tallahassee, FL 32302 (850) 410-8300 http://www.fdle.state.fI.us December 8, 1998 o 1§©I§U~¡g n DEC 1 4 U Chairperson St. Lucie County Commission 2300 V irginia Ave. Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Dear Sir/Madam: The gubernatorial appointment tenn of the District Medical Examiner in District 19 (Indian River, Martin, Okeechobee, and St. Lucie Counties) will expire on July 1, 1999. Pursuant to Florida Administrative Code, Chapter IIG-5.004(2), the Medical Examiners Commission will consider recommending to the Governor the incumbent, Dr. Frederick P. Hobin, or other qualified candidates for this appointment. So that the Commission can make an infonned decision, they are asking for your input on this matter. The topic is scheduled for discussion at the 1999 Spring Commission Meeting. As such, it would be appreciated if your office would complete the enclosed Reappointment Ballot Fonn and send it back to this office by January 15, 1999. .J, Please indicate your concurrence or non-concurrence with the recommendation for Dr. Hobin'š reãppointtfient.Y ou are .. invited to submit the name( s) of any other qualified candidate( s) that you want considered for this appointment. For your convenience we have included a self-addressed, stamped envelope for the return of the fonn. If you have any questions or if you wish to discuss your input, please feel tree to contact me. Sincerely, James T. Moore Commissioner M·1J I{Þ~ Dale H. Heideman Forensic Coordinator DHH: jl Jv Enclosure ~C, " aJlMl'1. . r~~\ 3L.\~~,_r ¡: " DEe \ 6 fS) ), - -~ ..þ.-~ \ l_·······-··· ': ('.·c· '- l.-- ._~~' t --'- \"\,.rl \2 '." ,(. r.\, '...-~~..., ~, '. ',¡ I' " f· f """ ~- ~- ....... ...........- - - '-" '....I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. A-I DATE: January 5, 1999 CONSENT REGULAR X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ Quasi-JD. TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 99-005 authorizing the Use of th Fund to facilitate the Development of the Proposed QVC Tel County, Florida. Incentive St. Lucie SUBMITTED BY: Community Development BACKGROUND: QVC, Inc., a worldwide electronic retailer is proposing to construct a 50,000 square foot "call center" in St. Lucie County. This center will be their fourth in the United States and is to be completed and in operation by the fall of 1999. QVC's first year estimated employment in St. Lucie County will be 323 full time positions, generating an estimated payroll of $7 million (including benefits) . QVC has indicated that it is their intention of employing 1,200+ employees by the year 2002 with an estimated payroll of twenty-three million ($23,000,000) dollars, including benefits. The St. Lucie County Job Growth Incentive Grant Program is designed to provide financial assistance for new employment opportunities in St. Lucie County. . Grants from this program may be used to mitigate relocation and local site development costs associated with the new business development. These grants are to be paid out in an incremental fashion over a six (6) year period, from the date the grant is awarded. QVC has requested access to these funds as part the development of their latest communications· center. ·QVC is requesting that they be awarded up to $2,000 per new full equivalent position, with the maximum benefit award being $500,000. QVC would be subject to the requirements of the Job Growth Incèntive Program. Draft Resolution 99-005 recognizes St. Lucie County's intention to provide QVC, Inc., up to $2,000 per full time equivalent position created with the development of their newest call venter in St. Lucie county. This resolution recognizes that the maximum award that may be granted to QVC s $500,000. This Resolution further recognizes that Board of County Commissioners agrees to consider an acceleration of the annual payments to QVC and a possible expansion of the maximum award under the St. Lucie County Job Growth Incentive Program, once QVC has confirmed its final employment needs and levels. These issues would be negotiated at a future date. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A N/A Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 99-005. ISSION ACTION: ] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: DENIED .-... Coordination/Siqnatures County Attorney: Mgt & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept: Other: Other: Finance: (copies only) : (AGEND406) .- ~ ...., þ\ COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: January 5, 1999 Resolution 99-005 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Ray Wazny, Community Development Director DATE: January 4, 1998 SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 99-005 Authorizing the Use of the County's Job Growth Incentive Fund to Facilitate the Development ofthe Proposed QVC Telephone Call Center in St. Lucie County, Florida. Attached, is copy of Draft Resolution 99-005, which, if approved, would authorize the use of the County's Job Growth Incentive Fund to facilitate the development ofthe proposed QVC Telephone Call Center in St. Lucie County, Florida. QVC, Inc., a worldwide electronic retailer is proposing to construct a 50,000 square foot "call center" in St. Lucie County. This center will be their fourth in the United States and is to be completed and in operation by the fall of 1999. QVC's three (3) other existing communications centers are in Texas, Virginia and Pennsylvania. QVC's first year estimated employment in St. Lucie County will be 323 full time positions, generating an estimated payroll of $7 million (including benefits). QVC has indicated that it is their intention of employing 1,200+ employees by the year 2002 with an estimated payroll of twenty-three million ($23,000,000) dollars, including benefits. The St. Lucie County Job Growth Incentive Grant Program is designed to provide financial assistance for new employment opportunities in St. Lucie County. Grants ftom this program may be used to mitigate relocation and local site development costs associated with the new business development. These grants are to be paid out in an incremental fashion overa six (6) year period, from the date the grant is awarded. QVC has requested access to these funds as part the development of their latest communications center. QVC is requesting that they be awarded up to $2,000 per new full equivalent position, with the maximum benefit award being $500,000. QVC would be subject to the requirements ofthe Job Growth Incentive Program. A copy ofthe regulations governing this program is attached for your reVIew. The attached Draft Resolution 99-005 recognizes St. Lucie County's intention to provide QVC, Inc., up to $2,000 per full time equivalent position created with the development of their newest call venter in St. Lucie County. This resolution recognizes that the maximum award that may be granted ~ ,..." January 4, 1999 Page 2 Subject: QVC, Ine! Resolution 99-005 Job Growth Incentive Program to QVC s $500,000. This Resolution further recognizes that Board of County Commissioners agrees to consider an acceleration of the annual payments to QVC and a possible expansion of the maximum award under the S1. Lucie County Job Growth Incentive Program, once QVC has confirmed its final employment needs and levels. These issues would be negotiated at a future date. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 99-005. If you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMITTED ent Director RW/DJM QVCI(a57) cc: County Administrator Asst. County Administrator County Attorney Economic Development Manager Planning Manager 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 '-' -....,I RESOLUTION NO. 99-005 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE USE OF THE COUNTY'S JOB GROWTH INCENTIVE FUND TO FACILITATE THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE PROPOSED QVC TELEPHONE CALL CENTER IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. That the Board of County Commissioners wishes to encourage economic development in St. Lucie County by providing incentives to companies to provide new or expanded employment opportunities in St. Lucie County. 2. The Board has established a program of incentives for companies to create NEW employment opportunities in St. Lucie County through its JOB GROWTH INCENTIVE GRANT PROGRAM. 3. QVC is proposing to construct a 50,000 square foot "call center" in St. Lucie County, to be completed and in full operation by the fall of 1999, 4. QVC's first year estimated employment level is 323 full time employees, generating an estimated payroll of $7 million dollars (including benefits), with the ultimate intention of having 1,200+ employees by the year 2002 with an estimated payroll of twenty three million ($23,OOO,OOO) dollars, including benefits. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of the St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Subj ect to QVC' s compliance with the Job Growth Incentive Program requirements, the Board agrees to provide $2,000 (two thousand dollars) per full time equivalent position created under the St. Lucie County Job Growth Incentive Program, with the maximum benefit of $500,000. Resolution 99-005 Page 1 January 5, 1999 Final 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 "-" .....,¡ B. The Board agrees to consider an acceleration of payments and an expansion of the maximum benefits that may presently be awarded under the St. Lucie County Job Growth Incentive Program, for QVC once QVC has confirmed its final employment needs and levels. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was follows: as Chairman Paula A. Lewis xxx Vice-Chairman John Bruhn xxx Commissioner Cliff Barnes xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx Commissioner Doug Coward xxx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 5th day of January, 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY CHAIRMAN ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: DEPUTY CLERK COUNTY ATTORNEY 99-002(a56) DJM Resolution 99-005 Page 2 January 5, 1999 Final )' A/· .' ~. AGENDA REQUEST ....., ITEM NO, DATE: O~tpber (g J qgg REGULAR [ XX ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. Mcintyre County Attorney - ,SUBJECT: Job Growth Investment Program Documents BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUN!)S AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: .RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the revised program documents. COMMISSION ACTION: [ ] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CONCURRENCE: Douglas Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: y Review and ADDrovals Management 'Budget . .G?~.~·'nrt·;;·M· r:~~ ··Oth' ....., ...~ ..'J ; .. ~ ... .. er:··· .. ......:...' ·c Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 -- '\ '" "'~ " '-'" 'wtI INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. Mcintyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 98-1366 DATE: September 2, 1998 SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: Job Growth Investment Program Documents As an incentive for businesses to expand or new businesses to relocate to St. Lucie County, the County created a Job Growth Investment Fund. Companies that either relocate to St. Lucie County or expand their existing businesses in St. Lucie County, creating new employment opportunities at certain average salary levels in the County in accordance with the Job Growth Investtnent Grant Program criteria, can receive a Job Growth Invesnnent Grant. Initial eligibility is deteffi1ined by the County's Job Growth Investment Grant Review Team. The Team is composed of four (4) Chamber of Commerce representatives, one (1 ) each from the Cities of Fort Pierce and Port St. Lucie, appointed by their respective city managers, and one (1) from the County, appointed by the County Administrator. Final approval of any grant is deteffi1ined by the Board of County Commissioners. . On August 23, 1994, the Board adopted Resolution No. 94-168 which approved the fOI111 of the Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement and the program process. The Grant Review Team has recently reviewed the program documents and suggested several changes to the documents. Copies of the revised program documents are attached. Some of the highlighted changes are as follows: ) /' " - - ~ '-" a definitions section has been added the minimum number of jobs that must be created has been changed to 5 from 10 the funding schedule provides for a 3 year or 6 year phased funding the Company. must provide the County with quarterly unemployment compensation reports (Fonn UC6) the audit requirement was deleted the default provision has been simplified RECOMMENDA TION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the revised program documents. DSM/caf . 'Ätta'dìment ~.........--..-..". -*_..... - \ I '-" 'wtI ST. LUCIE COUNTY JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT GRANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the _ day of , 199 _ by and between St. Lucie County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, by and through its Board of Commissioners, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY and ( ) as individual¡ ( ) a partnership¡ ( ) a corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida¡ hereinafter referred to as the COMPANY¡ whose Federal I.D. or social security number is WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS¡ it is the policy of the COUNTY to stimulate short tenn economic growth in St. Lucie County, by either attracting new businesses to St. Lucie County or by encouraging the expansion of existing businesses within St. Lucie County; and .- WHEREAS, the creatioÏ1 of neW empióYment óppörtunities for residënts of St. ·Lúcit -_.- County and the increased tax revenues resulting from such business expansion or relocation with St. Lucie County is beneficial to the local economy; and -. ..c.'~.... _,;.-: WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has detennined ·that offering a Job Growth Investment Program encourages either businesses to expand or new businesses to enter St. Lucie County and thereby create new employment oppornmities for the residents of St. Lucie County; and WHEREAS, St. Lucie County, through its Board of County Commissioners, has created a Job Growth Investment Fund; and WHEREAS, the COMPANY will either relocate to St. Lucie County or expand its existing business in St. Lucie County and thereby create certain new employment opportunities at a certain average salary level in St. Lucie County in accordance with the Job Growth Investment Grant Program criteria if the COUNTY provides to the Company a Job Growth Investment Grant; and WHEREAS, the COMPANY has been detenTIined to be eligible to receive a Job Growth Investment Grant by the COUNTY's Job Growth Investment Grant Team; and G: \atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -1- \..,i \wi WHEREAS, the CQMPANY acknowledges that this Agreement shall be based upon proven performance of the requirements of these grant procedures; and, WHEREAS, the COUNTY finds and declares that it is in the public interest to award a Job Growth Investment Grant to COMPANY pursuant to the terms of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and muwal covenants hereinafter contained, the parties do agree as follows: 1... Definitions. As used in this Agreement. the following terms shall mean: a. "Annual Average Waf!.e" - includes salary. bonuses. and commissions. D. "Application Period" - A period beginning on the date of the issuance of certificate of occupancy and extendinf!. for a period of 1 2 months. ~ "Default" - failure to comply with the terms of the Agreement. ~ "Expansion of an existinf!. business" - A business establishinSJ 5 or more jobs to employ 5 or more full-time employees in the County provided that such business increases operations on a site owned by the same business resultinf!. in a net increase in employment of not less than· 5 percent. ~ "Full-time Equivalent Employee" - An employee who works at least 35 hours per week for 52 weeks Der year. (including holidays. vacations. ~ f.. "New Business" - a business establishinf!. 5 or more jobs to employ 5 or more full-time emplovees in the County within a 12 month period provided that such business first begins operations on a site in the CountY clearly separate from any other operation owned by the same business. g.. "P~o2Tam Administrator" - County· staff _member appointed by the County· Administrator- with resDonsibility to monitor program compliance. 2. Term: Termination. This Agreement shall be effective upon the date of execution of this contract by both parties hereto, and shall automatically terminate six (6) years thereafter unless terminated earli.er by the County because of a default by the COMPANY. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -2- ,.... -.-.--..... '-' ..., 3. Grant Eligibility: Payment Schedule. The COMPANY will be eligible for a Joþ Growth Investment Grant (hereinafter a "Grant") of an amount not to exceed $ which Grant shall be payable as follows: (Schedule provides for a 3 year or 6 year Dhased funding): 3 Year funding": Year 1 - 33%: Year 2 - 33%: Year 3 - 33% (not to exceed $25.000 per year): 6 Year funding: Year 1 - 20%: Year 2 - 20%: Year 3 - 20%: Year 4 - 20%: Year 5 - 10%: Year 6 - 10%. 4. Relocation Commitment. As a condition precedent to, and as consideration for obtaining Grant funds from COUNTY, the COMPANY agrees to locate or expand its business operations to St. Lucie County for a period of at least six (6) years to a suitable site as described on Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof (Exhibit to be completed by Program Administrator). 5. Job Creation Commitment. As a further condition precedent to, and as consideration for obtaining Grant funds from COUNTY, the COMPANY agrees to create certain employment opporttmities in St. Lucie County as more specifically set forth on Exhibit "B", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. In accordance with the provisions of paragraph 6 hereinbelow, the number of employee transfers from out of St. Lucie County, if any, and the number, dates and salaries of all new hires must be substantiated in writing, to COUNTY's satisfaction, within twelve (12) months of issuance of a certificate of occupancy or othér period· ås agreed by the County, by the Parnês Lhereto and annually thereafter for a period of six (6) years. Written verification of date of occupancy must be provided to the COUNTY. The COMPANY's . failure to maintain its job creation commitment for anyone year wiJI result in the forfeirore of the Grant amount it was scheduled to receive for that year: however. such forfeirore will not preclude the COMPANY's receipt of scheduled Grant amounts for subsequent years in which it is able to maintain its job creation commitment. 6. Salary Level Commitment. As a further condition precedent to and as consideration for obtaining Grant funds from COUNTY, COMPANY agrees to pay and maintain for a period of six years subsequent thereto an average salary equal to or greater than per annum to those of its employees . located in St. Lucie County; excluding the top three (3) salaries of upper management employees COMPANY shall provide written verification satisfactory to COUNTY to such average salaries in accordance with the provisions of paragraph 6 hereinbelow. The COMPANY'S failure to maintain its salary level commitment for anyone year will result in the forfeirore of the Grant amount it was scheduled to receive for that year: however, such forfeirore will not preclude the COMPANY's receiDt of scheduled Grant amounts for subsequent years in which it is able to maintain its salary level commitment. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -3 - - - - -v \wi 6-: Audit Requiremel"!t. Written audited verification, satisfactory to COUNTY in its sole discretion, of compliince by COHPANY vv'ith all agreed upon performance standards as set forth in paragraphs 1 5 hereinabove must be conducted by an independent auditing firn1 acceptable to the COUNTY and submitted to St. Lucie County. The audits may be performed in conjunctio with other auditing services. The audit shall cO'ver each 12 month period following issuance of certificate of occupancy subsequent to the effecth--e date of this Agreement for a period of six (6) years. COHP-ANY, at its sole cost and expense, shall pro' vide such audit '¡erification to CO UNTY on or before the expiration of the twelfth calendar month following the effecti'y'e date of this Agreement and artnually thereafter during the term of this Agreement. =h Annual Status Report. for a period of five 95) years after the conclusion of the first tyy'elve (12) month period subsequent to the effective dte of this Agrèement, the COMPANY 'must pro"¡ide the COUNTY "w'.ith annual status reports of its business operadons ",.-ithin Sf:. Lucie County on the "Annual Status Report form" Vt11ich is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "0". 7. Annual Job Status. The COMPANY must provid~ the COUNTY with quarterlv unemployment comoensation reports (Form UC6) of its business operations within St. Lucie CountY on the State form UC6 as amended which is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "0" . 8. Grant Restriction. The Grant funds available under this Agreement as referenced in paragraph 2 will be· provided only for reimbursement of expenses associated with the physical move, relocation and/or expansion of the COMPANY to St. Lucie County as set forth on Exhibit "C", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. 9-: Out of Pocket Expenses. In accordance '{1ith paragraphs 2 and 8 hereof;-aH eligible "Out of Pocket" expenses incurred directly by COHPANY "NiII be reimbursed up to an amount not to exceed $ , in accordance with the list of the types and amounts of expenditures eligible for reimbursement as set forth in Exhibit "C". All requests for payment of "Out of Pocket" expenses e~igible for reimbursement undér the terms of the Agreement shaH include copies of paid receipts, in"voices, or other documentation acceptable to the Sf:. Lucie County Management and Budget Director. Such documentation shall be sufficient to establish that the expense was actually incurred directly by COHPANY. 9. Default: Termination. In the event COMPANY defaults in the oerformance of its l!Uarantees and commitments as orovided for in this Aereement. the COUNTY may. at its option, terminate this Aereement, G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -4- -- - - '-' ...., _ Default; Termination. In the event COHPANY defaults in the performance of its guar-antees and commitments as prcvided for in this Agreement, COHPAN¥ covenants and agrees as follows, (A) COHPANY shall in1mediat-ely return tc COUNTY all or a portion of grant funds as determined by the COUNTY in its sole discretion received by it from COUNTY, plus int-erest calculat-ed in accordance with Paragraph t or thereon if any of the following e'{ents occur. (t) (2) (3) ( 4) COHPANY fails to provide to COUNTY the 'v'iritten audit , satisfactory to COUNTY of its performance obligations herein in accordance 'iJith the provisions of paragraph 6 hereinabove, or COHP ANY cannot establish in its audit report required by paragraph 6 hereinabove that it had creat-ed a minimum of 25 new jobs in St. bide County ,,,..ithin t 2 months from the issuance of a certificate of occupancy and maintained those jobs for at least six (6) years, or COHP ANY cannot establish in its audit report required by paragraph 6 hereinabove that, ,..ith regard to the ne',,, jobs creat-ed pursuant to this Agreement, COMP-ANY has failed to maintä'fian a"verage salaryle'/el for such jobsëqual w"o'Fgrëatet" than t 00% of the St. Lucie County av-erage salaryh'iage or the a'v'erage salary/wage le'lel of the applicable industrf cluster le'~'el for a period of six (6) years. COMPANY fails to comply ·{.,'ith the commitment to relocat-e to St. Lucie County for at least six (6) years. B. COHPANY shall immediately retum to COUNTY all grant funds received by it from COUNTY as a result of any and all bonus incentive awards, plus interest calculat-ed in accordance 'it'ith Paragraph lOr, in the eyent COHPANY fails tc achieye any such bonus performance obligations as provided form in this Agreement. C. In the event COHPANY meets d,e minimum performance guarantees as provided ofr in this Agreement (i.e. the creation of at least 20 jobs with an a'ferage salary level equal tc or greater than t 00% of the St. Lucie County a'v'erage salaryhvage or the a".¡erage salary/"liage level of the appliable industry clust-er, but COHPANY fails to creat-e and maintain for a period of six (6) years the number of jobs required pursuant to the terms hereof, then COHPANY shall reimburse to COUNTY a sum of G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -5- \wi '-" money equal t"O t 00% of the per job award incentive rate times the number ofjobs not created, plus int~rest -caTculated in accordance "{¡ith Paragraph t or below. Eo The COUNTY's remedies as set forth in paragraph t OB, t OC and 10D hereinabove shall be consider~d cumulative and shall not, in any way, be mutually exclusive. In the event of a default by the COHPANY, the COUNTY may, in addition to recm¡ering the grant funds as set out above, t~rminate the Agreement. r. In the e'/ent that the COUNTY exercises its rights pursuant to paragraphs 10A D, inclusÎ\'e, the COUNTY shall be entitled to receive from COHPANY interest on the entire sum of money refunded to COUNTY ·which interest rat~ shall be calculated at prime plus two on ~ the dat~ of default and which interest shall accrue thereon· from the date that COUNTY pro·v;ded the Grant funds to COMPANY up to and including the date that the COHPANY actually refunds such Grant funds to COUNTY. -1--t-; Performance Security. (Optional at discretion of COUNTY> ) To secure the performance of its guarantees and commitments under this Agreement, the COHPANY shall provide the COUNTY, upon signing the Agreement, ·iv·ith an tmr,¡ö·Cåblé- lèttér of credit or öt'ter appropriate security as deterh1irrelt b~{the-"'-' County Attorney in the amount of $ 1 O. Indemnification. For ten and 0/100 ($ 10.00) dollars consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the COMPANY shall indemnify and save harmless and defend the COUNTY and the St. Lucie County Chamber of Commerce, their agents, servants, and employees from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, and/or cause of action which may arise from any negligent act or omission of the COMPANY, its agents, servants, or employees in the perfonnance of services under this Agreement. 11. Forum: Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Any and all legal action necessary to enforée- the Agreement will be held in St. Lucie County. No remedy herein conferred upon any party is intended to be exclusive of any other remedy, and each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be in addition to every other remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing by law or in equity or by statute or otherwise. No single or partial exercise by any party of any right, power, or remedy hereunder shall preclude any other or further exercise thereof. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -6- \..f "'" 12. Lobbyist Certification. The COMPA1'!Y warrants that it has not employed or retained any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the COMPANY to solicit or secure this Agreement and that it has not paid or agreed to pay any person, company, corporation, individual, or firm, other than a bona fide employee working solely for the COMPANY, any fee, commission, percentage, gift, or any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from the award or making of this Agreement. 13. No Discrimination Certification. The COMPANY warrants and represents that all of its employees are treated equally during employment without regard to race, color, religion, disability, sex, age, national origin, ancestry, marital status, or sexual orientation. 14. - Attorneys' Fees. If any legal action or other proceeding is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement, or because of ·an alleged dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation in connection with any provisions of this Agreement, the successful or prevailing party or parties shall be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees, court costs and all expenses (including taxes) even if not taxable as court costs (including, without limitation, all such fees, costs and expenses incident to appeals), incurred in that action or proceeding, in addition to any other relief to which such party or parties may be entitled. 15. Enforceability. If any term or -provision of this Agreement,-õr the application·'"u_. thereof to any person or circumstances shall, to any extent, be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such terms or provision, to persons or circumstances other than those as to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected, and every other term and provision of this Agreement shall be deemed valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by law. The COMPANY's failure to maintain its job creation commitment or salary level commitment for anyone year will result in the forfeiture of the Grant amount it was scheduled to receive for that year; however, such forfeiture will not preclude COMPANY's receipt of scheduled Grant amounts for those subsequent years in which it is able to maintain its job èreatiQn and salary level commitment. 16. Asshmment. COMPANY shall not assign this Agreement to any other persons or firm without first obtaining COUNTY's written approval. 1 7. Conflict of Interest. The COMPANY represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder, as provided for in Florida Statutes 112.311. The COMPANY further represents that no person having any interest shall be employed for said performance. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -7- '-' ...., t 8. Notices. All notices required in this Agreement shall be sent by certified mail - , return receipt requested and if sent to the COUNTY shall be mailed to: - With a CODY to: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 and if sent to the COMPANY shall be mailed to (current, official address): 19. Entire Agreement. The COUNTY and the COMPANY agree that this Agreement sets forth the entire Agreement between the parties, and that there are no promises or understandings other than those stated herein. None of the provisions, tenns and conditions contained in this Agreement may be added to, modified, superseded or othelWise altered, except by written instrument executed by the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, ·has made and executed this Agreement ol1>behatf of the COUNTY arid COMPANY has hereunto set its hand the day and year above written. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney COMPANY G: \atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow .gnt - 8- '-" WITNESSES: G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -9- BY: - - - ...",,¡ Title Typed Name (Corporate Seal) '-" "'" EXHIBIT "A" TO THE JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND (COMPANY) (To be completed by Program Administrator) Company Identific~tion and Information: Applicant code number: 98 Application date: Company description: Company new location address: Company new mailing address (notify County of new address when known): - ....-. .- ...-.-. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -10- ~ '-' "'" EXHIBIT "B" TO THE JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND (COMPANY) (To be completed by Program Administrator) I. Industry Category: AerospacelEngineering (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Agriculture/Food Processing (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) BusinesslFinancial Services (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Computers/Communications (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Pharmaceutical and Medical Products & Devices (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Marine Manufacturing Industries (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) SportslRecreation Manufacturing Industry (eligible for 10% cluster bonus) Other (not eligible for cluster boilUs) IT. Application Section Criteria: Non-retail Expansion L- square feet or jobs) Relocation <- square feet or jobs) '·ill. Employment Còmmitment: ..~ ':.. ~..... -. .--. COMPANY is receiving this grant based upon its representation that it will bring the following employment opportunities to St. Lucie County: 1) _ Total number of employees (new and existing) 2) _ New, full time relocating employees 3) _ New, full time local hires 4) _ % of County residents (to be verified by employee's qua~erly unemployment compensation report) . 5) _ Average salary; New hires 6) _ Average salary; Industry average 7) _ Average salary; St. Lucie County average (TO BE COMPLETED BY PROGRAM ADMINISTRATOR) G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -11- ~r£A C..oo.s O\J(Q.o.I£ ~~... .......lt1"l ~t( ~~DI - IALPJJE F.( J.!f. II\5IIXR , \K aJc~ ~ ~\J)( ~ ~ QO,)1¡ ,. ~ rJ c-:rc1J ~ YIfIo ~tt1I cbi.""1 ð( I'1'.CrM:d fUY 2. Gtw, 'N~s Paid Uris O"~rlet $ . lor It'< pc:ricd ...nIdI ~ tile lIh 01 I!Ic mo.uh. IMu$t '4]ree M4n il~n ~ I . " 11r~ # J. ~4~ p~ 1M qu¡rlCt in acrss 01 $ $1.000 per employee ¡¡'i$ "jC¡r -- - w_ # 4. I~k: ~o /c( 1his C llMIC' S Glcm Z mInUS kœ J] .--... -- )cd ..- # s. T¡; ~ 1$ ,....lIttJpfr Õtt11\ 4 by T~ /I.11cl I <WIly Ole WO"~IÍOII C'OIItÙII::d CIIIlNs IcpoIt is !rue: ¡rod carrcd wi . - . . . --'-1$ , - ~ put oIlt'e u.c. t.u ctS. :¡( 'S 10 tie 11.~ Irono t~ cmplQycC's W¡çcs. 6. I'cnaltyOuc - SigNUC: ,~ in:sllv;1iOlt5I .. - - .' ----...- 1$ 7. ~'lctllSl Due . . TAJc: IS- inour,,,ti""~1 . Phooc Dale: -.- 8. O~IrOlll UCT·~7 $ Prerwer', /Qmc:: fSubtllct I!dcre~ T= ~¡ . ~·s Pt>or.:: 9. ioùl hTtOlln( O\.c $ ~~ I å>t'å p1¡nbletoFlor ~ uc. f<¡r.d 10. EfoIPtaCFS 11. EHPlC'l'Eë'S~· 12. EHP~atæs GROSS WAG6 s.ocw. ~rr NU~" '.HMtr,.... ... ww__.....-.-.,...-...... ....., r~ ICodd:. .f")JO 11iIS QJARTSt ..eøll_ kIi.. ~ .. . h S . .-...... .. .:~ ::'::..: .- . . 1$ . I .! $ S 5 $ S - - $ . )$ I Is \ \. TalU GraS$ 'J ;¡ç"S 1I<,s p.r- S u~ ~~ SCk Foe- Ad¿¡liooel Empl<T '=3 II Rc<¡wd $ I~. T...c <:.o:s w"9C: II ~"'Jcs IH,,~ .9'CC ";\1'1 it_ l . Gro.. \1109<:1; . .. . l:JJ-' .. I ~. To"'; NumÒd 01 Emç>Ioyco I"t:porlCd .1 p4<Jo Unemploy~nt Compensation Employer's ~arterly Report AI.L INFORMATION MUSì 6~ PRINTED CLEARLY IN SLACK INK Exhibit "0" - \.¡ ....., IV. Grant Amount: Base Amount ( x Dollars per job) (# of jobs) Bonuses (use 10% x base amount on each of the following: Cluster Company (10% bonus) 50 or more total jobs (10% bonus) 75% or more local hires (10% bonus) Average salary for applicant's jobs will be H5 125% of St. Lucie County average salary (10% bonus) Average salary for applicant's jobs will be H5 150% of St. Lucie County average salary (20% bonus) Average salary for applicant's jobs will be i5G 175% of St. Lucie County average salary (25% bonus) + Total Bonuses Total Grant (base amount + total bonuses) ....... ~ :_.....0;..,... . G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -12- -- ... ~ 'wi EXHIBIT "C" TO THE JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND (COMPANY) ELIGIBLE REIMBURSABLE: USE OF FUNDS. These monies may be used to reimburse COMPANY for the following expenses associated with the expansion and/or relocation of the COMPANY to St. Lucie County: 1. Corporate or Company Relocation Expenses (a) The cost of moving the company assets to St. Lucie County. 2. Payment of Impact Fees (a) Impact fees assessed to new development are at a proportionate share of the cost of providing the new capital facilities necessitated by that new development. (b) Impact fees assessed by the COUNTY. _. ..... ~ ... ......-.--:-..- -'- "(C) .', Im.Va'èt rîëeS . as~ssed-1jy'~ìuèai -g{'Vc:r:a.uiëî1ts~ 1fntlf?¡ t'Üy spc:è'iil'"~istricü - . -----.. .-\.¡.,. shall be limited to an amount recommended by the Job Growth Investment Grant Review Team that will review the fees. 3. Infrastructure Costs. (a) The cost to get a facility in ~ondition to opera,te as intended. (b) Reimbursable expenses shall be limited to land, land improvements, road improvements, and water and sewer connection fees. (c) Water and sewer connection fees charged by entities other than the County require pre-approval, as indicated in 2{ c) above. 4. Lease-hold Improvements (a) The cost of improvements made to leased property. 5. Company-sponsored Child Day Care Facilities (a) Initial set-up and implementation of day care facilities. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -13 - " - \..f .....",; (b) Eligible costs shall not include operating expenses. 6. Lease and Rent of Facility Expenses (a) Actual lease or rental payments for the company facilities. 7. Lease Buy-outs (a) Lease buy-outs at locations outside St. Lucie County when the relocating company vacates leased space to move to St. Lucie County prior to expiration of that lease. 8. Training Program Expenses for New Employees a) The cost of training and program expenses for new employees 9. Other Expenses .. ". (a) Other expenses as appro!ed by the Job Growth Investment Grant -, Revi,,~r 1:-e~m:~ -"".";-,'.'.' _.,~. .~~- or ".';;''''' .-,-...~ ....r .~... --:9 'U ~..:~~ :..- * Employee transportation, limited to loading and common carriers (including air/surface carriers-airline, vehicle rental, taxi) ; Costs associated with setting up new facility in St. Lucie County, excluding utility deposits; Employee advertising and placement fees (payments to advertise· and to employment agencies for relocating! placing new employees to St. Lucie County location); Relocation of office equipment and materials to facility location in St. Lucie County; Legal fees, excluding fees associated with- application process. Other expenses as recommended by the Committee. * * * * * G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -14 - '--' 'wi JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT (JGI) PROGRAM PROCESS Application Review, Approval and Funding: 1. Board of County Commissioners (BCC) adopt JGI Program guidelines. 2. BCC establish funding for JGI Program. 3. BCC establishes a Job Growth Investment Grant Review Team (Review Team) comprised of seven members whose composition includes four (4) Chamber of Commerce representatives, one (1) e~ch from the City of Fort Pierce and Port St. Lucie, appointed by their respective city managers, and one (1) from the Cõunty appointed by the County Administrator. 4. The St. Lucie County Chamber of Commerce (SLCCC) Economic Development Division (EDD) produces collateral material promoting JGI Program and application forms. 5. Applicants will submit written project details to the SLCCC EDD and the Program .... ". ...~.....~...~__."'" A.~.i~ktratarG~·Ad~~å."t:tO='.indu&~.!mti1'.ip::~:~·r:~..:.hcr~~·.:;:;;;·",hñre~<tthm~· "ioõõ .-:..;-;:.t ........ fll'St 12 months of operation, job descriptions with starting salaries, and the company's most recent financial statement. The grant agreement shall beperfonnance based. 6. SLCCC EDD receives and screens applicants for qualification recommendation. 7. SLCCC submits all applications to the Review Team for consideration and/or approval, including any item under the "Other Expenses" category. 8: Appro'Ÿ'ed applicants reccrn a letter from the SLCCC EDD identifying the total recommended funding amount subject ta BCC approval and expcnses eligible far rCÍmburscmcnt. 8. Applications recommended for approval are to be submitted by the St. Lucie County Chamber of Commerce to the Program Administrator for verification and presentation to the Board of County Commissioners. 9. The Program Administrator shall inform the applicant. by letter. ofthe Review Team's recommendation and the date. time and place the Board of County Commissioners will consider the approval. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -15- '-" '-' 10. JGI grant agreements are presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval and execution (consent agenda when standard contract is adhered to and- regular agenda when standard contract is not used, indicating the effective date of contract if not the BCC approval date of grant agreement). 11, Management and Budget Manager (MBM) receives invoices with receipt documentation from approved applicants, checks the invoices, removes all invoices ineligible for reimbursement, and makes a determination of compliance with grant agreement/JGI fund program. 12. MBM approves invoices and submits item to Clerk of BCC (Finance Department) for audit and payment. 13. If there is any dispute over th~ eligibility of costs submitted fo! reimbursement, then such dispute shall be submitted to the Review Team for recommendation. The Review Team shall refer unresolved issues to the BCC for review and action. 14. The Program Administrator SLCCC EDD will monitor COMPANY regularly to confirm compliance with targeted hiring goal. 15. COMPANY will supply quarterly unemployment compensation reports to the Program Administrator as required by the agreement. and documentation as necessary to the - . ~.. ~.;'. - rr.szgJo'am-Ad¡).1~'4~$~.¡"dt~H.fV¡4 ;¡¡;c·by-·m~E:€G in'its"'f&un~.-Gre¡fQ.1èt4.'ri;€~~'''~~-of _........-..,.~ the 12-month period following operational start up. demonstrating that the job creation and salary level commitment were achieved. The COMPANY's failure to maintain its job creation or salary level commitment for anyone year will result in the forfeiture of the Grant amount it was scheduled to receive for that year: however, such forfeiture will not preclude the COMPANY's receipt of scheduled Grant amounts for this subsequent years in which it is able to maintain its job creation and salary level commitinent. CaMP ANY wiH supply An audit as nquind by the agf'Cement, and docu.mentaoon as neccssary to MBMand thc SLeee, for u.se by SLCee in its annual report to Bee at the end of the 12 month period following operational start u.p, demonstrating that the hiring goal was accomplish cd. OtherwÏ3e, compan:r will be rcqu.irtd to immcdiatdy rdmburse Bee the amount spedfied in program penalty clause. 16. The Program Administrator SLCCC and l\ffiM will monitor COMPANY annually to determine its economic impact of its relocations or expansions. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -16- - '-' ~ JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT (JGI) FUND JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT PROGRAM CRITERIA I. Fund Amount: TO BE ESTABLISHED II. Overall Goal: Create 1000+ new, quality jobs III. Fund Administration: 1. Job Growth Investment Fund ("Fund") monies will be managed and dispensed by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners ("Board"). - 2. - The St. Lucie County Chamber of Commerce (SLCCC) will be the executive agent for accepting applications for Fund monies. The SLCCC Economic Development Division will review each application received to ascertain the extent to which it meets the criteria presented below. A copy of the application will be forwarded to the Program Administrator. The SLCCC Director of Economic Development will recommend consistent applications to the Job Growth Investment Grant Review Team for review on a weekly basis. 3. The Review Team must evaluate and, if appropriate, render a preliminary :. . "-. -';:'''-'.' """.- ..,=. . ...~ cmilmitméIit (approval) within fOllrteeIi" (1'4) days"of'tlieSr;CCC"DiftftiorlS'''' presentation, and schedule each approved application for final consideration at the next available meeting of the Board, but not more than fourteen (14) days from Review Team action. This time criterion for Board consideration may be extended upon request of the SLCCC Director of Economic Development or by the Board or the Program Administrator County Administrator. ..~...~~... 4. Recognizing that the funds for the Job Growth Investment Fund Program are limited, the Commission may prioritize, approve, disapprove and/or modify grant awards (including awarding of authorized bonuses) for the program at its sole discretion. 5. . Fund Start Date: To Be Determined. IV. Application Selection Criteria: 1. Industriallbusiness/agricultural-related industry expansion within St. Lucie County or relocation to the County that encompasses manufacturing, distribution, research and development, back-office, corporate headquarters, or other non-retail or wholesale function; and G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -17- - ~ .. ~ "" 2. Expansion/relocation will either (1) create.5. ~ new jobs or more, paying (an average of) at least 100% of St. Lucie County's Private Sector ave-rage- salary/wage level, or at least 120% of the average salary/wage level of the applicable industry cluster and provided that the top thl ee (3) salaries of the proposed company shall not be included in the calculation of th~ a-¡erag~; and 3. Expansion/relocation will be completed within 18 months of application approval; and 4. The total direct economic impact of the project to the County including the number, type, and quality of the jobs which will be produced in the County during the construction of the project and thereafter; and s. The direct economic impact of the project to the County including the .number, type, and quality of jobs which will be produced in the County as a result of suppliers, service providers and vendors serving the project. v. Grant Limits: 1. The maximum for grant award is a maximum of $2,000 per new-job created; larger per job awards are possible for those companies meeting Bonus Criteria. ."''''.'';:....,'' -, ·2~';~'>·· .- The maxim~m'grant~ward=1s ,SSOO;OOO,witb·pot-ential:for-larger.&war-ds"Upon- ~~. .'''' recommendation of the SLCCC, the Review Team and approval by the Board. 3. Unless otherwise determined by the Board, the grant award will be phased in over a three (3) or six (6) year period as follows (three year schedule is restricted to those receiving $25.000.00 less per year for the three year period): Year 3 (a) Year 1 33 5G% of grant (b) Year 2 33 l5% of grant (c) Year 3 33 l5 % of grant Year 6 ÚÙ Year 1 - 20% of grant - ill Year 2 - 20% of grant - W Year 3 - 20% of grant - @ Year 4 - 20% of grant - W Year 5 - 10% of grant - ill Year 6 - 10% of grant - G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -18- - '-" '-' 4. Bonus' may be granted by the Board based on the following criteria: (a) Company line of business is within the industry clusters identified in Exhibit "B", Section Ij or (b) Job Growth within 12 months exceeds 50 jobs; or (c) The average per-job salary/wage projected in a subject application is greater than 125% of St. Lucie County's average private sector salary/wage level, or ofthe average private sector salary/wage level ofth~ applicable industry cluster, or (d) In addition to the bonus criteria set out above, a 10% bonus may be awarded if at least 75% of jobs are fIlled by residents of the County who have resided in the County at least one (1) year prior to the application. 5. :Minimum performaMe criterion: (a) Should aetual job creation fall below the ie-lei stated in the application within the first 12 months following issuance of occupancy, then thc company must reimburse the Fund for the full amount of the per job award rate times the number of jobs not crcated, plus intcrest as ealculated in Paragraph 10F of the Grant Agreement. (b) If a business does not create and maintain a minimum of25 jobs with an ~"t;;í:age-m.h).m~{atj'~k.',teI·ôf"ht·le2tst~133-%-of the St. k'Cic Couütr- :.- -- --.~.. ----, average '''age per year ,,,ithin 12 months from the ~~mance of certificate of occupancy, all monies from Job Growth Inycstment Fund must bc returned, plus i~terest as calculated in Paragraph 10F of the Grant Agreement. .__...., ...~,.-- .- .~-- ..... (c) If a business fails to obtain eertificate of occupancy within twelve months of thc execution of thc Grant Agrccment, all monies received from the Job Growth Investment Fund must be returned, plus interest as calculated in Paragraph 10F of the Grant Agreement. (d) To secure the obligations of this subparagraph, the County may require the business to provide the County with an irrevoeabk letter of el edit or other form of security acceptable to the County Attorney. ¥.h Eligible Fund Uses: Fund monies will be disbursed to approved companies, on a 1 eimbulsement basis only, for one or more of the f-6l1owing typcs of costs: 1. Corporate, company, or personnel relocation expenscs; G:\atty\agreernnt\docS\job-grow.gnt -19- 8. - '-' ""wI 2. Payment of impact fees; development fees (building permit fees) J. Infrastructure eosts; 4. Lease hold improvements; 5. Loan interest pay down; 6. Partial offsets against real estate costs; and 7. Company sponsored day care facilities; - Other expenses a3 rtcommended by the Job Growth Investment Grant Re,iew Team. G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -20- '-"'" "'" JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT FUND GENERAI;-GUIDELINES - APPLICATION APPROVAL In addition to the adopted criteria of the Job Growth Investment Fund Program, the following methodology to grant awards, basing the grant award amount upon the number of jobs created is recommended. This methodology is applied only on a case-by-case basis (depends on the JGI application under review by the committee) JOBS CREATED S ~ - 49 50 - 99 100-149 150- PERCEl'I"T AGE OF FUNDING AWARDED 50% 65% 75% 100% AMOUNT PER JOB $1,000.00 $1,250.00 $1,500.00 $2,000.00 G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -21- '-'-' "'" Other Considerations: Disqualify upper management (töp 3 salaries) in average salary calculatiöns Company can qualify for maximum 75% tax abatement unless requirement is waived by BCC. Change industry categories that qualify for bonus Performance Security Change guidelines Phase in funding Year 1 50% Year 2 25% Year 3 25% Year 1 - 20% or Year 2 - 20% Year 3 - 20% Year 4 - 20% Year 5 -10% Year 6 -10% Year 1 - 33°.10 Year 2 - 33% Year 3 - 33% *Not to exceed $25.000 per year G:\atty\agreemnt\docs\job-grow.gnt -22- - - '-' CONSENT AGENDA .. ! '...", . --"- ..---.-. - ~- _.- 12/31/98 FZABVARR -;;~~5: FUND 001 001116 101 101001 101003 101006 102 102001 102103 105 107 107103 112 114 116 117 119 120 122 123 126 136 138 139 160 170 182 183 183001 183002 183104 183203 183206 185203 186 186202 315 316 352 362 382 401 401217 418 421 441 451 461 ~ ~ '-' ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD VARRANT UST 114- 24-DEC-98 TO 31-DEC-98 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund See 112/MPO/FHVA/Planning 98/99 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust Interlocals Transportation Trust/Local Option Transportation Trust/Impact Fees Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Urban & Community Forestry 97/98 Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund DOJ-107-Local Law Enforcement Block Ri ver Park II Fund Harmony Heights 4 Fund Sunland Gardens Fund Sunrise Park Fund Holiday Pines Fund The Grove Fund Indian River Estates Fund Queens Cove Lighting Distl13 Fund Southern Oak Estates Lighting Monte Carlo Lighting MSTUl4 Fund Palm Lake Gardens MSTU Fund Palm Grove Fund Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Court Facilities Fund Environmental Land Acquisition Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat Domestic Relations Officer 98/99 OSCA Court Reporter grant 97/98 FDJJ-Teen Court 98/99 FHFA-SHIP 98/99 Recycling Operating Fund DEP-Recycling & Education 98/99 County Building Fund County Capital SHI Vastewater Treatment Proj Fund Sports Complex Improv Fund Environmental Land Capital Fund Sanitary Landfill Fund DEP-Vaste Tire 98/99 Golf Course Fund H.E.V. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund EXPENSES 612,563.99 73.23 14,717.74 650.00 3,850.00 175.00 13,423.00 9,926.50 2.97 128.74 2,512,545.04 18,020.33 510.60 439.04 486.78 121.51 705.98 139.32 842.62 247.62 109.35 1,285.70 104.53 653.83 154.74 385.81 5.94 726.41 94.91 225.00 5,979.15 796.10 2.97 31.37 166.38 0.74 20.00 4,734.50 1,439.07 997.50 225.00 40,092.87 2,209.50 9,532.64 9.00 48,408.61 1,155.44 10,613.61 .~ - _._- - - --_..- ..,-.- __ . - '0 _,_ . __._ -'0. PAGE 1 PAYROLL 560.70 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 105.98 1,766.38 1,660.36Ð0.00 12/31/98 FZABVARR - S~LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD '-' PAGE 2 .. VARRANT LIST 114- 24-DEC-98 TO 31-DEC-98 FUND SUMMARY FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 491 Building Code Fund 338.84 0.00 501 Automated Services Fund 23,317.97 0.00 505 Insurance & Loss Fund 1,973.11 5,248.41 510 Service Garage Fund 3,188.24 1,593.96 611 Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund 6,102.74 0.00 625 Law Library 5,010.42 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 3,359,662.00 10,935.79 .~~ -- - 12/31/98 '-' ST. LUCIE COUNl'Y - BOARD '....,.I ;z.- PAGE 1 FZABVARR VARRANT LIST 1114- 24-DEC-98 TO 31-DEC-98 FUND SUMMARY- AIRPORT ..:.....:..~ c.ì FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 140 Port & Airport Fund 1,530.24 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 1,530.24 0.00 -_.~~.7' ... .--. ~ 'sT:" LUCIE COUNrY - BOARD 12/31/98 - ....., FZABVARR VOID LIST# 14- 24-DEC-98 TO 31-DEC-98 FUND: 107 - Fine & :~rfeiture Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR 00236729 99006267 Key, Patricia V 99006636 CHECK TOTAL: FUND TOTAL: TOTAL 738.00 738.00 1,476.00 1,476.00 PAGE 1 ~ - - 12/28/98 ~LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD -....I PAGE 1 FZABVARR VARRANT LIST #13- 19-DEC-98 TO 23-DEC-98 FUND SUMMARY /;"'~"'4 FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 001 General Fund 275,306.01 279,030.20 001116 Sec 112/MPO/FHVA/Planning 98/99 46.56 3,053.96 001120 Communi ty Services Block Grn t 98/99 2,147.16 218.75 001235 TDC Planning Grant 98/99 0.00 244.78 101 Transportation Trust Fund 8,454.06 88,362.86 101006 Transportation Trust/Impact Fees 2,500.00 0.00 102 Unincorporated Services Fund 1,886.34 32,152.57 102001 Drainage Maintenance MSTU 129. 11 2,944.74 102103 Urban & Community Forestry 97/98 9.45 936.80 105 Library Special Grants Fund 2,620.06 1,925.61 107·· Fine & Forfeiture Fund 179,844.94 58,736.26 113 Harmony Heights 3 Fund 199.37 0.00 160 Plan Maintenance RAD Fund 981.52 1,964.80 182 Environmental Land Acquisition Fund 24.57 2,505.89 183 Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir 352.34 4,123.51 183001 Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat 122.69 2,449.60 183002 Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat 435.50 0.00 183206 FDJJ-Teen Court 98/99 11. 34 1 , 138 . 46 185201 FBFA-185-SHIP 96/97 0.00 616.36 185202 FBFA- SHIP 97/98 13,950.00 0.00 185203 FBFA-SHIP 98/99 12.47 616.44 186 Recycling Operating Fund 166.14 1,334.69 186202 DEP-Recycling & Education 98/99 4.44 444.89 401 Sanitary Landfill Fund 18,287.44 25,369.11 418 Golf Course Fund 2,239.94 16,055.10 421 H.E.V. Utilities Fund 51.81 158.89 441 North Hutchinson Island Utilities 645.54 2,649.10 451 S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund 542.08 2,490.10 461 Sports Complex Fund 4,830.08 7,805.51 491 Building Code Fund 372.77 15,140.00 501 Automated Services Fund 4,587.10 47,389.99 505 Insurance & Loss Fund 16,763.63 0.00 510 Service Garage Fund ~ 6,268.96 7,082.00 611 Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund 1,441.30 2,697.31 625 Law Library 68.63 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 545,303.35 609,638.28 t- '~-,"",~.-.' \.. · 12/28/98 ~ LUCIE COUNl'Y - BOARD 'wi PAGE 1 FZABWARR WARRANT LIST #13- 19-DEC-98 TO 23-DEC-98 FUND SUMMARY-AIRPORT I· FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 140 Port & Airport Fund 412.36 6,159.12 GRAND TOTAL: 412.36 6,159.12 t · 12/28/98 ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ....., PAGE 1 FZABYARR VOID LIST/! 13- 19-DEC-98 TO 23-DEC-98 FUND: 001 - General Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00236573 99006176 Cokes Stationers Inc 99006204 99006206 99006213 99006215 99006523 99006528 99006528 99006528 99006528 99006528 99006578 99006578 99006758 CHECK. TOTAL: 36.06 246.71 17.81- CREDIT MEMO 33.36 40.28 10.33 10.36 20.14 20.50 10.63 10.96 70.17 57.96 58.47 608.12 FUND TOTAL: 608.12 ~~"',o-,.. , . .. - p -- ----- ....- - ;'-1'":;,,:::,-,-~ 12/28/98 ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD -.....I FZABWARR VOID LIST# 13- 19-DEC-98 TO 23-DEC-98 FUND: 101 - Transportation Trust Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR 00236573 99006761 Cokes Stationers Inc FUND TOTAL: TOTAL 84.13 84.13 . PAGE 2 12/28/98 ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD '-' FZABVARR VOID LISWI 13- 19-DEC-98 TO 23-DEC-98 CHECK FUND: 107 - Fine & Forfeiture Fund INVOICE VENDOR 00236791 99006383 Vebb Esq, Stuart 99006386 99006388 99006389 99006390 99006392 99006395 99006397 99006646 "';"':''::;'''--. CHECK TOTAL: FUND TOTAL: t TOTAL 950.00 950.00 950.00 950.00 950.00 950.00 950.00 950.00 950.00 8,550.00 8,550.00 PAGE 3 12/28/98 ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD """ FZABWARR VOID LIST# 13- 19-DEC-98 TO 23-DEC-98 ..-C--, FUND: 140 - Port & Airport Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00236573 99006576 Cokes Stationers Ine 32.44 FUND TOTAL: 32.44 , PAGE 4 12/28/98 ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD .....,¡ FZABYARR VOID LIST# 13- 19-DEC-98 TO 23-DEC-98 FUND: 145 - Mosquito Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR 00236573 99006654 Cokes Stationers Inc FUND TOTAL: TOTAL 7.72 7.72 -~. -~:;~~'~ ~ PAGE 5 12/28/98 FZABVARR ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ....".¡ VOID LIST# 13- 19-DEC-98 TO 23-DEC-98 FUND: 183 - Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir TOTAL CHECK INVOICE VENDOR 00236573 99006660 Cokes Stationers Inc FUND TOTAL: 18.00 18.00 .o¡¡r-.;~'--,"~,... t PAGE 6 12/28/98 '-' FZABYARR ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD VOID LISTfl 13- 19-DEC-98 TO 23-DEC-98 FUND: 501 - Automated Services Fund .·0"-·'':-;' CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00236573 99006184 Cokes Stationers Inc 99006688 663.94 501. 56 1,165.50 1,165.50 CHECK TOTAL: FUND TOTAL: t PAGE 7 ~ ...1 . ,..-, ~ 12/28/98 . ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ....¡ FZABVARR VOID LIST# 13- 19-DEC-98 TO 23-DEC-98 ~-~";;''4"l;-;:':;' FUND: 510 - Service Garage Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00236573 99006506 Cokes Stationers Inc 136. 18 FUND TOTAL: 136.18 . PAGE 9 ~ '-" AGENDA REQUEST '....,I ITEM NO. C-2 DATE: January 5, 1999 CONSENT X -i"- REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ Quasi-JD. TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBJECT: Public Hearing Advance Notice. SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Community Development BACKGROUND: The following public hearings Commissioners meeting of January thereafter as possible. will 19, be scheduled for 1999, at 7:00 p.m., the County or as soon 1. ERNEST BODINE, has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from the RM-S (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre) zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District. (Location: South side of Tilton Road, approximately 1,600 feet West of Silver Oaks Drive) 2. petition of FORT PIERCE AIR CENTER - HANGAR 4, for a Major Adjustment to an existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport to add 3,360 square feet of office space to Hangar 4, for a total of 38,666 square feet. (Location: 2982 Aviation Way, St. Lucie County International Airport - Hangar 4) 3. ORDINANCE 99-001, which proposes general amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code (second public hearing) . FlmDS AVAILABLE: Not Applicable. PREVIOUS ACTION: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board acknowledge the Public Hearing schedule for January 19, 1999. ~J'::::O:ION; [ ] OTHER: CONCURRENCE: DENIED Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator Conrñination/~;c¡natl1rPR County Attorney: Mgt & Budget: Purchasing: originating Dept: Other: Other: Finance: (copies only) : - , ¡ttIf1"" '-' ......; ~rc COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: JANUARY 5, 1999 GQNSENT AGENDA MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Ray Wazny, Community Development Director Þv-- DATE: December 22, 1998 SUBJECT: Advance Notice for Public Hearings It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the publication of the legal advertising for the following public hearings for January 19, 1999, at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. 1. ERNEST BODINE, has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning trom the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 duJacre) Zoning District. (Location: South side of Tilton Road, approximately 1,600 feet West of Silver Oaks Drive) 2. Petition of FORT PIERCE AIR CENTER - HANGAR 4, for a Major Adjustment to an existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport to add 3,360 square feet of office space to Hangar 4, for a total of 38,666 square feet. (Location: 2982 Aviation Way, St. Lucie County International Airport - Hangar 4) 3. ORDINANCE 99-001, which proposes general amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code (second public hearing). Please call me if you have any questions. RLW/jrnr cc: County Administrator County Attorney File - ~ '--' '....I AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. C 3 DATE: JANUARY 5,1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] TO: Board of County Commissioners PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Heather Young Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Healthy Kids of St. Lucie County - Second Amendment to March 11, 1997 Lease Agreement BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum C.A. No. 98-1900 FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed second amendment to the March 11, 1997 lease agreement with Healthy Kids of St. Lucie County, and authoriæ the chairman to sign the amendment. NCE: [ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ~ Doug sAnderson County Administrator - County Attorney: Of Review and Approvals Management & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable): _ '-' .~ c?;; INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 98-1900 DATE: December 22, 1998 SUBJECT: Healthy Kids of St. Lucie County - Second Amendment to March 11, 1997 Lease Agreement BACKGROUND: Attached to this memorandum is a copy of the second amendment to the March 11, 1997 lease agreement between the County and Healthy Kids of St. Lucie County for approximately three hundred fifty (350) square feet of office space in the South County Annex Building. The proposal amendment will extend the term of the lease through and including September 30, 1999. The rent will remain one and 00/00 dollars ($1.00) per year. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board of COl.U1ty Commissioners approve the proposed second amendment to the March 11, 1997 lease agreement with Healthy Kids of St. Lucie County, and authorize the chairman to sign the amendment. Respectfully submitted, .~ ö::?r- Heather Young Assistant County Attorney Attachment HY/ ~ u_ Copies to: County Administrator Finance Director Management and Budget Manager Contract Administration Coordinator \wf ....., SECOND AMENDIYIENT TO lYlARCH 11, 1997 LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND HEAL THY KIDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY TillS SECOND AlvIENDMENT made and entered into this day of . 1998, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY. a political subdivision of the State of Florida. ("Lessor"). and HEALTHY KIDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, ("Lessee"). WHEREAS, on March 11. 1997. the parties entered into a Lease Agreement which provided for the Lessee agreed to lease certain office space from the Lessor; and. WHEREAS, on October 7. 1997. the parties entered into a First Amendment to the Lease Agreement to extend the term of the Agreement through and including September 30. 1998; and. WHEREAS, the parties desire to further extend the term of the Lease Agreement through ãD.d including S-eptember 30. 1999. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein. the parties agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 5. TERM: EARL Y TERMINATION of the Lease Agreement dated March 11. 1997, as amended,. is hereby amended to read as follows: 5. TERM: EARLY TERMINATION. The term of this Lease shall commence Orl April 1. 1997. and shall continue through and including September 30, 1999 (the "TERM"). and may be extended as hereinafter provided. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein. Lessee - _and Lessor shall~ach have the right to terminate this Leas~with ot without cause upon ninety (90) days prior written notice to the other ~ party. - 2. Excepl as amended herein. the terms and conditions of the~ March~l), 19~7 Leas~ - - -1- ~ ....., Agreement, as previously amended, shall remain in full force and effect. IN ·WITNESS "VHEREOF, the Lessor has hereunto subscribed and the Lessee has affixed its name, and seal the date aforesaid. ATTEST: BOARD OF COTJNTY COìVIlVIISSIONERS ST, LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRlvlAL'f APPROVED AS TO FORlYI AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ATTEST: HEALTHY KIDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY BY: ~~-l ~ C AIRlvIAN . (SEAL) g:\atty\agreemnt\amend.98\healt-kids.2a -- - - -2- \-- \.w '~ ITEM NO. C4 DATE: January 5, 1999 AGENDA REQUEST SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] PRESENTED BY: ¿~~~~ County Engineer TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: The Preserve at Savanna Club - Plat approval for parcels 6 and 7 in phase four. BACKGROUND: The Savanna Club is a residential development consisting of four phases. Phases one through three are existing platted and developed sections. The developers have permitted phase four and wish to record the plat at this time. A performance bond in the amount á $570,952.80 for the permitted roadway and drainage work has been submitted to the County. Per the plat, the roads and drainage facilities will be private, and the County will have no maintenance responsibility. FUNDS AVAIL.: ~ PREVIOUS ACTION: NONE RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval of the Plat for parcels 6 and 7 of phase four of The Preserve at Savanna Club and authorize Chairman to execute the documents. N: C R [ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ----..-- glas Anderson County Administrator [X)County Attorney ~ Jr' OJ f"\ [X]Originatlng Dept. Public WorkS~ agenclub r-r- CoonJl~W'es [X]Comm. [)&y. [X]Co. Eng .-Ùf\J\ r pqC4~ ( ]other '-' Bond~l S 101l81621 BeM c~ SUBDMSION BOND Know All Men by These Presents: tbat Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America. a corporation of the state of Texas, is held and finnly bound unto the "Board of County Commissioners", St. Lucie County, Florida, obligee herein, in the penal sum of five hundred seventy thousand, nine hundred fifty two dollars and 80/100, ($570,952.80) to be paid to the obligee, its successors or assigns, for payment whereof well and truly to be made the Community Savanna Club Joint Venture, a Delaware general partnership does bind itself, its "uccessors and assigns firmly by these presents; THE CO~'DmON OF 1HE FOREGOING OBLIGATION IS SUCH THAT: WHEREAS, said Community Savanna Club Joint Venture, a Delaware general partnership is filing with the lJbligee for permission to design, plan and construct Phase IV draining and street paving, in and along Parcels 6 and 7, Savanna Club Plat No. Four, According to the Plat Thereof, as RecolÙed in Plat Book 30, Page 15 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, Said Lands Lying in the St Lucie County, Florida, and Containing 64.080 Acres, More or Less, under the tenns and conditions set out by the subdivision regulations. WHEREAS, the above bounden Permittee has, on the 14th day of December, 1998, been granted a permit by the City for the design, plan, constrnction, reconstruction or remodeling of certain improvements as designated, defined and described in the said Permit and the conditions thereof, and in accordance with the Specifications and Plans thereof; including the furnishings of all materials, equipment, tools, work, superintendence, and other facilities and accessories; a copy of said Permit being attached hereto and made a part hereof; NOW, THEREFORE, in the event tbat said Permittee shall and will, in all particulars well and duly and faithfully observe. perfonn and abide by each and every covenant, condition and part of said permit, and the condition specifications, plans and other Permit documents hereto attached, or by reference, made a part thereof according to the trne intent and meaning in such case, then this obligation shall be and become null and void, otherwise it shall remain in full force and effect; PROVIDED FURTHER, in the event that said permittee fails to duly pay for any labor, materials, team hire, sustenance, provisions, provender, ~line, lubricating oils, fuel oils, grease, or any other supplies or materials used or consumed by said Permitte or his contractors, subcontractors and persons furnishing labor or materials or labor and materials used or performed in the prosecution of the work, the Surety will pay the same in any amount not exceeding the amount of this obligation, together with interest as provided by law~ PROVIDED FURTHER, That the said Surety, for value received hereby stipulates and agrees that no cbange, extension of time, alteration or addition to the tenns of the Permit, or the work to be performed thereunder, or the Specifications and Plans accompanying the same, or incorporated by reference into such Permit, shall in anywise affect its obligation on this bound and it does hereby waive notice of any change, extension of time, alteration or addition to the terms of the Permit, or to the work, or to the Specifications and Plans. IT WITNESS WHEREOF, the Permittee and said Surety have executed these presents this 14th day of December,1998.· Community Savanna Club Joint Venture By: Cornmunity Ai ition d elopment Corporation (Seal) ~) ~J-.-.- (Attest) . ~) hL~ Jé.":J Of-0dCLÅ J~ Linda S. Downs Florida Resident Agent TRAVELERS C~TY AND SURETY COMPANY OF AME:"""¡" TRA VELm CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY Hartford, Connecticut 06183-9062 TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF ILLINOIS Lisle, llIinois 60532 POWER OF ATTORL'ŒY AND CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY OF ATTORNEY(S)-IN-FACT '{OW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, THAT TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY OF YŒRICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AND SURETY COMPANY and FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPANY, rporaùons duly organized under the laws of the State of Connecùcut. and having their principal offices in the City of Hartford, JUnty of Hartford, State of Connecùcut, and TRAVELERS CASUALTY AL'ID SURETY COMPANY OF ll..LINO IS , a rporaùon duly organized under the laws of the State of Illinois, and having its principal office in the City of Lisle. County of ..tPage. State of Illinois, (hereinafter the "Companies") hath made, cOn5Ùtuted and appointed, and do by these presents make, nsùtute and appoint: Ray B. Baldwin, m or Da Rankin * * , Lufkin, TX, their true and lawful Attorney(s)-in-Fact. with full power and authority hereby conferred to sign, execute and :knowledge, at any place within the United States, or, if the following line be filled in., within the area there designated e following instrument(s): .. hislher sole signature and act. any and all bonds, recognizances. contracts of indemnity, and other writings obligatory in the :lture of a bond. recognizance, or condiùonal undertaking and any and all consents incident thereto not exceeding the sum of THREE MILLION (53,000,000.00) DOLLARS per bond· . nd to bind tbe Companies, tbereby as fully and to tbe same extent as if tbe same were signed by tbe duly autborized officers f the Companies" and all tbe acts of said Attorney(s)-in-Fact, pursuant to tbe authority herein given, are hereby ratified and onfirmed. 'his appoinunent is made under and by authority of the following Standing Resolutions of said Companies, which Resoluùons are :ow in full force and effect: :OTED: That th~ Chairman. the President, any Vice Chairman. any Executive Vice President. any S~nior Vice President, any Vice President. any ~cond Vice President, th~ Trc:lSUrer. any Assistant Tre::LSurer. the Corporate Sc:cretary or any Assistant Secretary may appoint Attorneys-in-Fact .;¡d Ag~nts to act for :lnd on behalf of the company :lnd may give such appoint:: such authority as his or her certifiC.1.te of authority may presc:rib~ J sign with the Comp:lnY's name :lnd seal with the Company's seal bonds, recognlz:lnces, contracts of inde:nnity, and other v..ritings obligatory in ,1:: nature of a bond, recognizanc~. or conditional W1d~rtaking, and any of said officers or th~ Board of Directors at any time may remove any such .;¡pointee and revoke th~ power give:'! him or her. '/OTED: That the Chairman. the President any Vice Chairm:ln, any Executive Vice Presid~nt any Senior Vic: President or any Vice President :Jay d~!egat~ all or:l!'1Y part of th~ foregoing authority to one or more ot1ic~rs or ~mploye~s of this Company, provid~d that each such delegation is n v.Titing :lnd a copy thereof is tll~d in th~ otTIce of the Secretary. :OTED: That any bond. re-::ognizance. contract of indemnity, or \"riting obligatory in th~ nature of a bond., recog:nizanc~. or conditional ~:H.lt:rtaking shall be valid ami binding upon th~ Company wh~n (a) sign~d by th~ President, :lnY Vic~ Chairman. any Ex~cutiv~ Vic~ Presid~r.t :In)' )~nior Vic~ President or any Vice President. any Second Vic~ President, th~ Treasurer, :lnY Assistant Treasurer, th~ Corporate S~cretary or :lnY .l.ssistlnt Secretary and duly attest~d and sealed with the Company's seal by a Secretary or Assistant Secretary, or (b) duly executed (under seal, if -~quired) by one or more Attorn~ys-in-Fact and Agents pursu:mt to the power prescribed in his or her certificate or their certificates of authority or JY one or more Company otTIcers pursuant to a written d~legation of authority. This Power of Attorney and Certificate of Authority is signed and sealed by facsimile under and by authority of tbe following St:lI1ding ,Resolution yoted by tbe Boards of Directors of TRAVELERS CASUALTY A..'fD SURETY COl\'œ.~'lY OF A..'ŒRICA, TRAVELERS CASUALTY AL'Il> SURETY CO'MPA...'fY, FARMINGTON CASUALTY COMPAL'IT and TRAVELERS CASUALTY AL'lD SURETY COMPAJ.'fY OF ll..LINOIS, which Resolution is now in full force and effect: VOTED: That th~ signature of ~ach of the following officers: President, any E:'Cecutive Vice President; any Sc:nior Vice President, any Vice ?r~sjdent, any Assistant Vice Presid~nt, any Secretary, any Assistant S~cretary, and the seal of the Company may be affl.,<e:d by facsimile to any ;¡ower of attorney or to any certifiC.1.te relating thereto appointing Resident Vice Presidents, Resident Assistant Secretaries or Attorneys-in-Fact for ;:)\l!,?oses only of ~xc:cuting and att~sting bonds and W1d~rtakings and other writings obligatory in th~ natur~ thereof, and any such power of attorney ;x c;:rtilicate bearing such facsimil~ signature or facsimile seal shall b~ valid and binding upon the Company and any such power so executed and c:=rtilied by such facsimile signatur~ and facsimile seal shall b~ valid and binding upon th~ Company in the futur~ with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is att::lched. (~.')i) '. CR~EN lFfOMPSON & ASSOCI~ES INC. Engineers Planners Surveyors 3563 N.W. 53rd Street Fort Lauderdale, FL 33309-6311 (954) 739-6400 Fax (954) 739-6409 Vero Beach '-' ....,J.. . , ;r~ Œ @ Œ U ~ J~!! ~Jr f112fI!JW¡ ENGINEERING February 25, 1998 Mr. David Hays St. Lucie County Engineering Department 2300 Virginia Avenue, Room 229 Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 RE: SAVANNA CLUB PHASE 4 PAVING & DRAINAGE PLAN REVIEW, 3rd SUBMITTAL CT&A PROJECT NO. 90-0017.06 Dear Mr. Hays: Enclosed for your final review and approval are four (4) sets of revised paving and dra inage plans for the referenced project. The plans have been revised per your letter dated January 15, 1998. We will forward a check to your office for the stormwater permit fee as soon as we receive written cofirmation from your office indicating the fee amount required for this project. Also enclosed is a signed and sealed copy of the revised cost estimate for the paving, drainage and utility improvements for this project. This copy is identical to the one we faxed to your office on February 12, 1998. Should you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at 954-739-6400 or Mr. Gary Dunmyer at 561-778-3002. Sincerely, CRAþ~PSON & ~SSOCIATES, INC. ROBERT M. CONNORS, P.E. Senior Engineer RMC/slc cc: Gary Dunmyer (Vero Beach Office) '--' SAVANNA CLUB PHASE 4 ....., COST ESTIMATE ESTIMATED TOTAL DESCRIPTION QUANTITY .utilI UNIT PRICE AMOUNT A} PAVING: 1. Type S-III Asphalt 30,893 SY 2.75 84,955.75 2. 4" Limerock 2,512 SY 3.50 8,792.00 3. 6" Limerock 29,729 SY 4.35 129,321.15 4. 6" Stabilized Subgrade 2,512 SY 1.75 4,396.00 5. 8" Stabilized Subgrade 41,823 SY 2.00 83,646.00 6. Swale Grading 48,000 SY 0.35 16,800.00 7. Seed & Mulch 28,000 SY 0.18 5,040.00 8. Sod 20,000 SY 1.15 23,000.00 9. Stop Signs 17 EA 260.00 4,420.00 10. 24" White Thermop!astic Stop Bar 221 LF 3.00 663.00 11. 4" Yellow Thermoplastic 850 LF 0.60 510.00 12. Set PCP's 1 LS 4,000.00 4,000.00 Paving Subtotal 365,543.90 B.} DRAINAGE: 1. Catch Basin Typical 40 EA 960.00 38,400.00 2. Catch Basin 5' Diameter 6 EA 1,595.00 9,570.00 3. Catch Basin 6' Diameter 2 EA 2,005.00 4,010.00 4. Catch Basin Reel. 5' x 4' minimum 2 EA 1,500.00 3,000.00 5. Manhole 4' diameter 5 EA 1,070.00 5,350.00 6. Manhole 5' Diameter 2 EA 1,570.00 3,140.00 7. 15" RCP 1 ,489 LF 13.30 19,803.70 8. 15" CAP outfall (20 If ea.) 4 EA 830.00 3,320.00 9. 18" RCP 1,584 LF 19.80 31,363.20 10. 18" CAP outfall (20 If ea.) 4 EA 920.00 3,680.00 11.24" RCP 487 LF 27.90 13,587.30 12.24" CAP outfall (20 If ea.) 3 EA 1,120.00 3,360.00 13. 30" RCP 334 LF 34.20 11,422.80 14.30" CAP outfall (20 If ea.) 0 EA - - 15. 36" RCP 630 LF 43.80 27,594.00 16. 36" CAP outfall (20 If ea.) 6 EA 1,720.00 10,320.00 17.42" RCP 258 LF 58.60 15,118.80 18. 42" CAP outfall (20 If ea.) 1 EA 2,370.00 2,370.00 Drainage Subtotal 205,409.80 CTA Project No. 90-0017 j:~obs\90-0017\spread\Costest.630 Page 1 of 2 2/12/98 f ! '-' SAVANNA CLUB PHASE 4 COST ESTIMATE \",,¡¡II ESTIMATED TOTAL DESCRIPTION QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT C.) WATER: 1. Remove 12" Plug & Connect to Existing W.M. 1 EA 1,025.00 1,025.00 2. 12" W.M. Including Fittings 2,920 LF 17.00 49,640.00 3. 12" DIP W.M. 186 LF 20.00 3,720.00 4. 6" W.M. Including Fittings 6,737 LF 9.50 64,001.50 5. 6" DIP W.M. 20 LF 15.00 300.00 6. 4" W.M. Including Fittings 976 LF 8.75 8,540.00 7. 12" Gate Valve 3 EA 1,567.00 4,701.00 8. 6" Gate Valve 19 EA 745.00 14,155.00 9. 1" 8ackflow Meter 1 EA 970.00 970.00 10. 1" PE Water Service 1 EA 400.00 400.00 11. Double Service Short 33 EA 370.00 12,210.00 12. Single Service Short 45 EA 360.00 16,200.00 13. Double Service Long 74 EA 490.00 36,260.00 14. Single Service Long 24 EA 445.00 10,680.00 15. Fire Hydrant with 6" Tee & 6" Gate Valve 21 EA 2,055.00 43,155.00 16. Blowott 11 EA 500.00 5,500.00 17. Sample Point 14 EA 140.00 1,960.00 Water Subtotal 273,417,50 D.) SEWER: 1. 8" PVC 4' - 6' Cut 4,291 LF 14.70 63,077.70 2. 8" PVC 6' - 8' Cut 2,797 u= 15.60 43,633.20 3. 8" PVC 8' -10' Cut 1,692 LF 16.05 27,156.60 4. 8" PVC 10' -12' Cut 8~7 LF 18.20 15,233.40 5. 8" PVC 12' - 14' Cut 32~ LF 20.20 6,484.20 -. 6. 8" DIP 4' - 6' Cut 20 LF 38.90 778.00 h 7. Manhole 4' - 6' Depth 23 EA 1,990.00 45,770.00 8. Manhole 6' - 8' Depth 8 EA 2,747.00 21,976.00 9. Manhole 8' - 10' Depth 6 EA 3,470.00 20,820.00 10. Manhole 10' -12' Depth 4 EA 3,975.00 15,900.00 11. Manhole 12' -14' Depth 2 EA 5,056.00 10,112.00 12. Drop Connections 9 EA 700.00 6,300.00 13. Single Laterals 41 EA 480.00 19,680.00 14. Double Laterals 121 EA .s50.00 66,550.00 15. Drill Exist Sanitary Sewer & Connect 8" F.M. 1 EA 1,409.00 1,409.00 16. Pavement Restoration 65 SY 180.00 11,700.00 17. Iron Fittings (Included in F.M.) 5 TONS - - 18. 8" PVC F.M. 6,507 LF 11.00 71,577.00 19.8" DIP F.M. .d00 LF 24.85 9,940.00 --- ~. 8.50 20. 6" PVC F.M. 2", u= 170.00 - 6.60 21. 4" PVC F.M. 1, 500 LF 10,560.00 . - 22. Lift Station ! 1 EA 52,085.00 52,085.00 Sewer Subtotal I 520,912.10 Grand Total ~ 1,365,283.30 -c- J ~/jt... -"",.--- 1V T "'. j:~obs\90-0017\spread\Costest.630 CTA Project No. 90-0017 Page 2 of2 ~I ¡. S/" 2/12/98 "'- ....¡ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. c- s+ DATE: 01/05/99 CONSENT X REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ ] Quasi -Jud. [ TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Community Development SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 99-003 ap roving of International Alzheimer's Foundation Trust for Major Site Plan Approval for the project to be known as International Alzheimer's Foundation Trust located on the south side of West Midway Road, approximately 700 feet east of Dunn Road, in the I (Institutional) Zoning District BACKGROUND: Petition of International Alzheimer's Foundation Trust to consider Draft Resolution 99-003 which would grant Major Site Plan Approval for the project to be known as International Alzheimer's Foundation Trust to allow for the development of a 68-Bed assisted living facility. The project consists of 41,140 square feet of space. (File No: SP-98-047/RZ-98-007) FUNDS AVAILABLE· N/A. PREVIOUS ACTION: None. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Draft Resolution 99-003, granting Major Site Plan Approval for the Project to- be Known as International Alzheimer's Foundation Trust on 4.96 acres of property located on the south side of West Midway Road, approximately 700 feet east of Dunn. DENIED 9 as M. Anderson Administrator :O~S::::O:::ION; [ ] OTHER: Review and ~provals County Attorney: Management & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Department: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) .~ ....., C0P'- COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: 01105/99 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Community Development Director Date: December 30, 1998 Subject: Consider Draft Resolution 99-003 approving the request of International Alzheimer's Foundation Trust for Major Site Plan Approval for the project to be known as International Alzheimer's Foundation Trust. (File No.: SP-98-047/RZ-98-007) International Alzheimer's Foundation Trust has applied for major site plan approval for the project to be known as International Alzheimer's Foundation Trust to allow for the development of a 68-Bed assisted living facility to be located on 4.96 acres ofland on the south side of West Midway Road, approximately 700 feet east of Dunn Road. The project consists of 41,140 square feet of space. Staff has reviewed the request for major site plan approval and has determined that it is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and not in conflict with the Goals, Objectives, or Policies ofthe St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 99-003, which, if approved, would grant this request for Major Site Plan Approval, subject to the following condition: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer of International Alzheimer's Foundation Trust, shall submit an utility agreement with the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) for the provision of utility services. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 99-003. SUBMITTED: cc: Ed Porch Emesto Velasco, P.E. File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ~ .. .....,.¡ RESOLUTION 99-003 FILE NO.: SP-98-047/RZ-98-007 A RESOLUTION GRANTING MAJOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS INTERNATIONAL ALZHEIMERS FOUNDATION TRUST WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of 8t. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following detenninations: 1. International Alzheimers Foundation Trust has applied for major site plan approval for a 68-Bed assisted living facility on 4.96 acres ofland on the south side of West Midway Road, approximately 700 feet east of Dunn Road, in the I (Institutional) Zoning District. The project consists of 41,140 square feet of space. 2. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet minimum technical requirements ofthe 8t. Lucie County Land Development Code and to be consistent with the future land use maps from the 8t. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 3. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of the 8t. Lucie County Land Development Code, the 8t. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of 8t. Lucie County. 4. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character ofthe neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. 5. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. 6. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 7. The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of the 8t. Lucie County, Florida: File No.: SP-98-047/RZ-98-007 January 5. 1999 Resolution 99-003 Page I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 ~ ~ A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code, the site plan for the project to be known as International Alzheimer's Foundation Trust, is hereby approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Velcon Group, Inc. dated November 18, 1998, and date stamped received by the S1. Lucie County Community Development Director on December 16, 1998, for the property described below, subject to the following condition: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the developer of International Alzheimer's Foundation Trust, shall submit an utility agreement with the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) for the provision of utility services. B. The property on which this development will take place is described as follows: WIDTE CITY SUBDMSION, SECTION 5, TOWNSIDP 36, RANGE 40, PART OF LOT 106 LYING EAST OF DRAINAGE DITCH 103 AND ALL OF LOT 107 LESS ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY (TAX ID#: 3403-502-0199-000/8); WHITE CITY SUBDIVISION, SECTION 5, TOWNSIDP 36, RANGE 40, THE NORTH 130 FEET OF LOT 112 AND THAT PART OF LOT 113 LYING EAST OF CANAL 103 LESS ROAD RIGHT -OF-WAY (TAX ID#: PART OF 3403-502-0204-000/7); AND, WHITE CITY SUBDMSION, SECTION 5, TOWNSIDP 36, RANGE 40, BEGINNING AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 100, RUN EAST 135 FEET, THENCE SOUTH 659.4 FEET, THENCE WEST 135 FEET, THENCE NORTH TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING _ LESS ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT-OF-WAY (TAX ID#: 3403-502-0192-000/9) (Location: South side of West Midway Road, approximately 700 feet east of Dunn Road) CONTAINING 4.96 ACRES, MORE OR LESS. C. This site plan shall expire on January 5, 2001, unless building permits are issued or an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(B)(3), S1. Lucie County Land Development Code. D. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on January 5, 1999. E. A copy ofthis resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Section A, which plan shall be placed on file with the S1. Lucie County Community Development Director. File No.: SP-98-047/RZ-98-007 January 5. 1999 Resolution 99-003 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 '" .4f ." ......, After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis xxx Vice-Chairman John D. Bruhn xxx Commissioner Doug Coward xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx Commissioner Cliff Barnes xxx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 5th Day of January 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney hf H: \ WP\RESOL UTI.N\FINISHED. 99\Intemational. SP\IntemationalRES. wpd File No.: SP-98-047/RZ-98-007 January 5. 1999 Resolution 99-003 Page 3 .. .. "'-"" JI ....".¡ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. c.. - '5 ß DATE: January 5, 1999 CONSENT [ X ] REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ ] Quasi-JD. [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Community Development SUBJECT: Letter of support to the US Department of Commerce for the App cation by e Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council for Economic Development District Designation BACKGROUND: The Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council is in the process of preparing the application to the US Department of Commerce for Palm Beach County, Martin County, and St. Lucie County to be designated an Economic Development District. This designation would make the district eligible for additional federal assistance funds for the purpose of generating new jobs, helping to retain existing jobs, and stimulate industrial and commercial growth in the area. FUNDS AVAIL: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On June 9, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners voted to join the efforts of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council to gain the designation from the U.S. Department of Commerce. On September 22, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners appointed the St. Lucie County representatives to the Treasure Coast Overall Economic Development Program Committee. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize the Chairperson to sign the attached letter in support of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council application for designation as an Economic Development District and to transmit to the -U.S. Department of Commerce. 7ISS'0~ ACTIO~: [ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Doug sAnderson ty Administrator ~ Coordination/Signatures Mgt &: Budget: Purchasing: County Attorney: Originating Dept: Other: Other: Finance: (copies only): - "--.. " J"'--- ¥ ...." CSb January 5, 1999 Mr. William J. Day, Jr. Regional Director,Atlanta Region US Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration 401 West Peachtree N.W. Suite 1820 Atlanta, GA 30308 Re: Support of Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Economic Development District Designation Dear Mr. Day: The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners fully supports the application submitted by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council· for designation as an Economic Development District by the U.S. Economic Development Administration. The Board of County Commissioners also endorses the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council carrying out the functions and responsibilities of an Economic Development District as specified in Chapter 13, CFR, Part 303, Sect. 303.43, upon designation by the U.S. Economic Development Administration. Finally, the Board of County Commissioners intends to continue to participate as an active member of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council including its new role as an Economic Development District. Sincerely, Paula A. Lewis, Chair St. Lucie County Board of County Commission