The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 01-19-99 ~. ;.t '-' JAmJARY 19, 1999 ....." WELCOME BOARD OF COUNIY AGENDA GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prio.r to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMlSSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT-Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, Fl. 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. ~. ¡i '-" ...., ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS www.stlucieco.gov John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 AGENDA January 19, 1999 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held January 12,1999. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 3. CONSENT AGENDA PUBLIC HEARINGS COMMUNITY DEVEl,OPMENT 4A. Resolution No. 99-004/Petition of Ernest Bodine/Quasi-.J!ldicial- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a change in zoning from the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 dulacre) zoning district to the AR-l (Agricultural, Residential -1 du/acre) zoning district for 9.7 acres of land located on the south side of Tilton Road, approximately 1,600 feet west of Silver Oak Drive. 4B. Resolution No. 99-006/Petition of Fort Pierce Air Center/Quasi-.Judicial- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution authorizing a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport. 4C. ORDINANCE No. 99-001- This is the first of two required public hearings and is continued from January 5, 1999. Consider staff recommendation to approve the ordinance which proposes general amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The second public hearing will be held on February 2, 1999 at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. - l' '-" "wi CONSENT AGENDA .January 19, 1999 (1. WARRANTS LIST '-. 1 Approve warrants list No. 16. 2. MANAGEMENT AND BTIDGET A. Resolution 99-28- Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget resolution recognizing the $225,000 donation from the Friends of the Library and establishing a budget for the new downtown Fort Pierce library furniture. Staff also recommends the Board approve the list of furniture and equipment the library staff has selected for the new library and direct them to immediately begin the purchasing process. 2~3't / cUd B. Resolution No. 99-36- Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget resolution appropriating $2,500 from cable franchise filing fees to pay administrative costs associated with the franchise fee agreements. Also approve the line-to-line transfer for $7,500 for the same purpose. 3. PUBLIC WORKS Engineering- Consider staff recommendation to release the existing Surety Bond from Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (d/b/a Riverland Groves) and accept a new Surety Bond from Riverland and Indian Sun, L.c. 4. MOSQUITO CONTROL Resolution No. 99-32- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution amending Resolution No. 98-237 expanding the area of review of the Blind Creek Advisory committee to the entire Indian River Lagoon Blueway and change the name of the committee to the Blueway Advisory Committee. 5. COMMUNITY DEVEI,OPMRNT A. Whimbrel Landings- Consider staff recommendation to grant final plat approval for the site plan known as Whimbrel Landing SID located on the southwest corner of the intersection of North SR A-I-A and Jack Island Access Road. Authorize final execution. B. Interlocal Agreement- Consider staff recommendation to approve the interlocal agreement with the St. Lucie County Fire District for the establishment of a single point of collection for all Fire Department building permits and inspection fees. 6. ADMINISTRATION Taylor Creek- Consider staff recommendation to approve submission of a letter to the National Estuary Program requesting $200,000 to be used for the dredging of Taylor Creek. .,............. '-' .....,¡ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADDITIONS AGENDA JANUARY 19, 1999 CONSENT AGENDA ADMINISTRA TION A.I Taylor Creek- Consider staff recommendation to approve submission of a letter to the South Florida Water Management District to request $350,000 from FIND to be used for the dredging of Taylor Creek If ~ ~ ....", AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. ~ DATE: 1/12/99 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT [xx] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Administration Dong Anderson SUBJECT: Funding Requests for Taylor Creek Dredging BACKGROUND: In addition to the request to the National Estuary Program for funding to dredge Taylor Creek, staff is also requesting permission to submit a request to the South Florida Water Management District requesting $350,000 from FIND. FUNDS AVAIL : PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends submitting a letter to the South Florida Water Management District requesting $350,000 from FIND toward the cost of dredging Taylor Creek. ~ COMMISSION ACTION: [j] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: DENIED Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 '. ~ 'wi ~ ~ TO: BOARD OF COUNTY CO~ DOUGLAS M. ANDERSO~UNTY ADMINISTRATOR FROM: DATE: JANUARY 14,1999 T AYLOR CREEK DREDGING ~ECT: Staff is requesting authorization to ask the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) to request $350,000 ftom the Florida Inland Navigation District (FIND) to be used towards the cost of dredging Taylor Creek. The Budget breakdown is as follows: $ 250,000 500,000 200,000 350,000 350.000 $ 1,650,000 St. Lucie County State Funding through SFWMD National Estuary Program Indian River Lagoon Project Fund (State Legislature) SFWMD request to FIND Total Project Budget . ... .' \.; BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ~ FILE COpy CLIFF BARNES MEMORANDUM (7,o"m u'/ (') (7() ../ "--J \) TO: " DOUG ANDERSON, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CLIFF BARNES, COUNTY COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT 5 ~ FROM: DA TE: JANUARY 8, 1999 FEBRUARY ~EETING RE: I spoke with Marty Smithson of NEP today, who advised tbät he may not be able to attend the 2/8 meeting because of another speaking engagement. He will try to send Bob Day. However, he reconfirmed his believed that .Taylor Creek is a very worthwhile project and that he has $200,000 in this year's . budget that he believes could go to the project. To get this process started, he..~»,.. ':: \ <,needs a letter from us summarizing the proj~t:and·asIångforthe$200k. ':Hê:{~~~âi;i}i .,.,:- . .. .... .. .... . .' .. ,.. . - ..,... .... . ..' ., '+ ... : };WiII~kethat, along with a written scope ofw~rk,i1d ,schedUle to the, govern.:I~':c>:::';r: . :.;.. .' ;JJq:ård óf the SJRWMD for approval Be ab9indicatedthathe'ÞaSincludettä,. .. .': :~~ .'. . 'rêquest for $300,000 for Taylor Creek to the Legislature for the' Indian River.i:~1?;j::::".,t Lagoon Initiative funding package. By my calcÒlation, that leaves us only . .ê'>. ...~ $350k short, which FIND may be able to fund if requested by SFWMD.;. No 1 . DOUG COWARD. DistriCt NO.2' PAULA A. lEWIS. DiStriCt No. J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON. DiSlria No.4. CUFF OARNES. Distrla No.5 JOHN D. ORUHN. DistriCt . Counry Adminisrroror _ Douglas M. Anderson 2,300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce. FL ,34982-5652 · (561) 462-1408 FAX(561)462-21J1 . TDD(561)462-1428 '-' -...,¡/ .- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: January 12, 1999 Tape: 1 Convened: 9:00 a.m. Adjourned: 9:55 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Paula A. Lewis, John D. Bruhn, Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward, Cliff Barnes Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator; Phil Freeland, Asst. County Administrator; Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Ray Wazny, Community Development Director; Bill Blazak, Utilities Director; Jim David, Mosquito Control Director; Jack Doughney, Leisure Services Director; Mike Bowers, Road and Bridge Manager; Harvey Lincoln, M & B Manager; Don West, County Engineer; Jack Southard, Public Safety Manager; Charlie Bicht, Purchasing Manager; Joe Finnegan, PersonnellRisk Manager, Gayla Barwick, Tourism Manager, Julia Shewchuk, Economic Development Manager; Deputy Nickel; A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES (1-024) It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve the minutes of the meeting held January 5, 1999; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMATION (1-036) Resolution No. 99-34- Proclaiming January 8-22, 1999 as "Martin Luther King, Jr. Commemorative Period" in St. Lucie County. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 99-34; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. Mr. Charles Stewart, representing the Martin Luther King Commemorative Committee, was present to accept the proclamation. PUBLIC COMMENTS (1-1410) Mr. David Keown, Lakewood Park resident, addressed the Board regarding the Holiday Pines Utility. He requested the Board consider Lakewood Park having their own system in the future rather than being tied in with Holiday Pines. Mr. Keown also addressed the Board regarding E-mail being available for each Commissioner on the internet, so that the public can address their concerns to them directly. Mr. Bob Bangert, Holiday Pines resident, addressed the Board regarding the positive ideas presented by the Waterfront Council and the Conservation Alliance . Mr. Bangert commended the Solid Waste Manager for the sign placed at the Landfil1He also addressed the Board asking them to consider filing an application to the 1000 Friends of Florida to become an applicant for this years Waterfront Florida Partnership. '-' ....,; ~----~-_. ;- 4. CONSENT AGENDA (1-599) Com. Hutchinson commented on item C-4-D and stated she hoped staff would continue working on purchasing the easements necessary for completion of this project. Com. Coward commented on item C-3-C and commended staff for their diligence in having this project move forward. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve the Consent Agenda with item C-6 pulled from the agenda to be considered at a later date; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. WARRANT LIST 1. The Board approved Warrant List No. 15. 2. PURCHASING A. Bid No. 99-12- The Board approved awarding the bid for a triplex greens mower for the Golf Course to Kilpatrick Turf in the amount of$20,750. B. Bid No. 98-77- The Board approved awarding the bid for granite tee signs for Fairwinds Golf Course to Designer Golf Company at no cost in exchange for the advertising rights on the signs. C. Bid No. 99-04- The Board approved awarding the bid for a thennoplastic premelter with trailer for Road and Bridge to Linear Dynamics, Inc., in the amount of $28,500. > 3. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. CDBG Grant- The Board approved the CDBG Grant engineering contract with Lindahl, Browning Ferrari and Hellstrom and authorized the Chair to sign the Agreement, after the Florida Department of Community Affairs has reviewed and approved the contract. B. Final Plat Approval- The Board approved the site plan known as Roark's Grove SID located on the southeast comer of the intersection of Kelly Road and Sneed Road. C. Platt's Creek Regional Off-site Mitigation Area- The Board approved proceeding towards securing an option to purchase the Platt's Creek Regional Off-site Mitigation Area. D. Pennission to apply- The Board approved pennission to submit the Greenways and Trails Grant application to the DEP. 4. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Airoso Blvd. Widening Project- The Board approved the conveyance of several pond sites, authorized the Chainnan to sign the Statutory Warrant Deed. B. Indrio North Savannas Project- The Board approved the option agreement for Parcels 81 and 148 and authorized the Chainnan to execute the agreements. C. 800 MHZ Agreements- The Board approved the Amendment to the Agreement for an 800 MHZ Trunked Radio System with Motorola Inc. and authorized the Chainnan to sign the Agreement; (2) approved the interlocal agreements; and (3) approved the interlocal agreements with Port St. Lucie and Ft. Pierce and authorized the Chainnan to sign the agreements subject to approval by the respective city councils and fmal approval by the County Attorney's office. ~-'...--:-~...' 01/08/99 FZABVARR FUND 001 001106 001116 001120 001228 001235 101 101001 101002 101003 101006 102 102001 102103 103 105 107 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 126 136 138 139 140 160 170 182 183 183001 183002 -183206 185201 185202 185203 186 186202 205 242 282 315201 382 401 401216 401217 418 421 441 448 451 461 491 501 505 510 611 625 '-" TITLE '-" ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD VARRANr LIST #15- 01-JAN-99 TO OB-JAN-99 FUND SUMMARY GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 249,487.34 7,121.00 228.09 16.50 21,784.00 18.27 214,765.14 650.00 720.00 33,053.54 1,645.00 9,494.06 6,747.64 71.93 1,160.37 367.03 164,567.63 2,685.04 28.42 12.60 26.28 460.37 30.37 7.92 741.74 40.50 6.31 4.19 48.58 14.84 4.77 67.25 4.78 34.34 11,966.49 291. 08 90.00 184.74 314.46 284.34 225.00 85.45 44.93 7,100.00 114.34 505.81 31.62 4,468.85 858.46 7,851.70 40.00 13,450.00 17,675.94 1,398.20 8.02 19,925.77 3,899.73 99,053.89 2,311.00 67,035.70 15,220.59 1,279.29 30,376.91 60,995.85 24,973.39 518.87 2,550.71 1 , 111 ,246.97 General Fund FTA-001-49 USC Sec 5307 (Sec 9) Sec 112/HPO/FB\1A/Planning 98/99 Communi ty Services Block Grn t 98/99 ~i te Ci ty Park DEP TDC Planning Grant 98/99 Transportation Trust Fund Trans;~rtation Trust Interlocals Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option Transportation Trust/Impact Fees Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Urban & Community Forestry 97/98 Law Enforcement MSTU Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund ~ver Park I Fund River Park II Fund Harmony Heights 3 Fund Harmony Heights 4 Fund Sheraton Plaza Fund Sunland Gardens Fund Sunrise Park Fund Paradise Park Fund Holiday Pines Fund The Grove Fund Blakely Subdivision Fund Indian River Estates Fund Queens Cove Lighting Dist#13 Fund Southern Oak Estates Lighting Monte Carlo Lighting MSTU#4 Fund Palm Lake Gardens MSTU Fund Palm Grove Fund Port & Airport Fund Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Court Facilities Fund Environmental Land Acquisition Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat FDJJ-Teen Court 98/99 FHFA-185-SHIP 96/97 FHFA- SHIP 97/98 FHFA-SHIP 98/99 Recycling Operating Fund DEP-Recycling & Education 98/99 Beach Bond I&S.~Fund Port I&S Fund Environmental Land I&S Fund DOS-315-Fort Pierce Branch Library Environmental Land Capital Fund Sanitary Landfill Fund DEP-Litter Control & Prevent 98/99 DEP-Vaste Tire 98/99 Golf Course Fund H.E.V. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities Renewal & Replacement Fund S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund Building Code Fund Automated Services Fund Insurance & Loss Fund Service Garage Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Library PAGE PAYROLL 236,338.79 0.00 3,131.52 218.77 0.00 352.13 84,935.68 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 31,131. 70 2,917.14 936.80 0.00 1 , 911. 23 72,618.06 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5,859.12 1,964.80 0.00 2,634.84 3,222.71 2,449.60 0.00 1,138.46 0.00 0.00 1,232.80 1,334.69 444.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,977.91 0.00 0.00 15,778.66 170.14 2,835.50 0.00 2,665.36 8,085.74 15,335.37 51,090.80 0.00 7,037.61 2,697.31 0.00 586,448.13 '-" ...." D. Anita Street MSBU- The Board approved the Contract for Sale and Purchase for Parcel 17/Drainage Easement in the amount of$503.00 plus closing costs, and authorized the Chairman to execute the Contract for Sale. ,; ~j 5. PUBLIC WORKS A. Oleander Business Park MSBU- The Board approved the amended Interlocal Agreement with the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and the City ofFt. Pierce for the Oleander Business Park MSBU and authorized the Chairman to sign the Agreement. B. Resolution No. 99-33- The Board approved the resolution reducing tipping fees of Class III Construction and Demolition debris at the Glades Road Landfill, effective February 1, 1999. 6. ADMINISTRATION Advisory Boards and Committees Application Fiorm- This item was pulled. 7. LEISURE SERVICES Tourism - The Board approved the payment of the December invoices to MBI Advertising in the amount of$14,692.43. 8. MANAGEMENT/BUDGET A. Resolution No. 99-29- The Board approved the resolution amending Resolution No. 98- 280 to correct the amount budgeted. B. Budget Amendment No. 99-107/Equipment Request No. 99-195- The Board approved the amendment transferring $2,954 and the equipment request for the purchase of a laptop computer for the Office of Management and Budget. REGULAR AGENDA 5. MANAGEMENT/BUDGET (1-705) Resolution No. 99-30/Environmentally Significant Lands- For consideration before the Board was Resolution No. 99-30, approving the issuance of Limited Ad Valorem Tax Bonds in the approximate amount of $15,245,000 and the resolution related to the issuance of the bonds. Mr. Robert Freeman, Bond Council for the County and Mr. Bill Leedy from William R. Hough, addressed the Board's questions. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 99-30; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 6. ADMINISTRATION (1-1227) A. Restudy Joint Coordination Committee- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to appoint members to the "Restudy Committee" to provide local involvement in environmental restoration throughout south Florida in accordance with Resolution No. 97-120, in connection with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and the South Florida Water Management District projects. Direct the County Administrator to provide necessary administrative support. ..~ ,..--.,,' ,-'~':- ......, It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. Healthy Start Coalition- This item was pulled. 7. COUNTY ATTORNEY (1-1459) Indrio North Savannas Project- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to approve the option agreement for Parcel 30 and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct staff to close the transaction. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 8. UTILITIES/RECYCLING(1-1569) Work Authorization - For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to approve Amendment No.1 to Work Authorization No.6 with Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari and Hellstrom for professional services associated with the acquisition of Holiday Pines Utilities, and authorize the Chairman to sign subj ect to the approval as to form and correctness by the County Attorney. Mr. David Keown, Lakewood Park resident, addressed the Utility Director and questioned ifhe had held a meeting with the residents of Holiday Pines and inquire ifthey were willing to pay the cost. The Utility Director advised Mr. Keown that the Utility can support itself without raising the rates. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. NON AGENDAD ITEM Com. Barnes requested the Board ratify his appointment of Sylvie Kramer to the Budget Committee. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to ratify Com. Barnes' appointment; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 9:55 a.m. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court ~ ~ AGENDA REQUEST ~EM NO. '-fA DATE: 01/19/99 CONSENT REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg. [] Quasi -Jud. [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: . APPROVED OTHER: County Attorney: ~ Community Development t Director Co Request for Rezoning of Propert the south side of Tilton Road, approximate y 1,60 feet west of Silver Oak Drive from the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple- Family 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District - Draft Resolution 99-004 Petition of Ernest Bodine for a Change in Zoning from the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential 1 du/acre) Zoning District for 9.7 acres of land to allow for a single family home with horses and other livestock as accessory uses. (File No.: RZ-99-001) N/A The Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of7 to 0 wi th 2 members absent, recommended approval. of the rezoning at its December 18, 1998, meeting. Approve Draft Resolution 99-004 changing the· zoning from the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District for 9.7 acres of land located on the south side of Tilton Road, approximately 1,600 feet west of Silver Oak Drive. DENIED Review and Approvals Management & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: originating Department: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) '-' 'wi 41}- COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: January 19, 1999 Resolution 99-004 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners Community Development Director January 13, 1999 Petition of Ernest Bodine, for a Change in Zoning from the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 dulacre) Zoning District to the AR-l (Agricultural, Residential- 1 dulacre) Zoning District. (File No.: RZ-9-001) From: Date: Subject: The proposed rezoning of a 9.7 acre parcel of land located on the south side of Tilton Road, approximately 1,600 feet west of Silver Oak Drive from the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family- 5 dulacre) Zoning District to theAR-l (Agricultural, Residential- 1 dulacre) Zoning District to allow the applicant to construct a single family home with horses and other livestock as accessory uses. At the December 18, 1998, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of7 to 0 with two members absent, recommended approval of this petition as set forth in Draft Resolution 99-004. This proposed rezoning meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, arid policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends the approval of this petition for a change in zoning from the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 dulacre) Zoning District as set forth in Draft Resolution 99-004. SUBMITTED: hf cc: Ernest Bodine File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 '-" '-' RESOLUTION 99-004 Fll..E NO.: RZ-99-001 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING CLASSIFICATION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Ernest Bodine, presented a petition for a change in zoning from the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 duJacre) Zoning District to the AR-l (Agricultural,. Residential) Zoning District for the property described below. 2. On December 18, 1998, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the hereafter described request for a change in zoning 'from the RM -5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 duJacre) Zoning District to the AR-l (Agricultural, Residential) Zoning District for the property described below. 3. On January 19, 1999, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 4. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.0Jofthe St. Lucie County Land Development Code., 5. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the existing and proposed use of property in the surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board õfCounty Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County, Florida: A. The proposed change in the Zoning District Classification for that property described as follows: SECTION 23, TOWNSIDP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST. ST. LUCIE GARDENS, BLOCK 3, LOT 6 - LESS THE SOUTH 10 FEET AND LESS ROAD RIGHT-OF-WAY. (Tax ID#: 3414-501-0706-000/7) File No.: RZ-99-001 January 19, 1999 Resolution 99-004 Page I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 '-' -.....I (Location: South side of Tilton Road, approximately 1,600 feet west of Silver Oak Drive.) owned by Ernest Bodine, is hereby changed from the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple- Family - 5 dulacre) Zoning District to the AR-l (Agricultural, Residential) Zoning District. B. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the change to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula Lewis xxx Vice-Chairman John D. Bruhn xxx Commissioner Frances Hutchinson xxx Commissioner Dou~ Coward xxx Commissioner CliffBames xxx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 19th Day of January 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney hf H:\ WP\RESOLUTI.N\FINISHED.99\BODINE.RZ\BodineRES.wpd Resolution 99-004 Page 2 File No.: RZ-99-001 January 19, 1999 Q) ~ ..- 0 "'(J 0 0 I aJ 0) ......... 0) en N Q) c: 0: '- W ~ v ------ z '" ., E :;: .,.> " ¡:::.,.> .,¡ " U e '" ~ A'" . 0 ¡::: þ G) ~ w 0 " > - > ( ,,-' c 0 "" ( '" ~ E '" 0 ",... ~ .... 0 ï ~~ t ~ ::s- . E <J ø. 0 e:<: ~ o '" '" ~ U ( ci ... OIl 0 " CJ '-" I> (, o , (, ~ "\ :? .... en .... '" 0:: .~ Z ø ::> 0 ~ ~ Ü I I Z I Q't'OV ItrtI-IS ::> I 0 1 0_ )NI' ~t1f Ü a: I ~ il ~ $1 z a: .. ;1 u w Z ., =1 ~ ..... i: ., NOl'b1tJ "" <{ 0:: GO"" :::E ~ ;;:1 0: C ~ . -;¡ s ~. i S Sf .... "" ~ .... "" a: 0: AlNno~ 3380H~33)10 Ernest Bodine Zoning 10 I I I I I I I RM-S: I I I I I I I /I /2 /J u ------------ AR-1 RM-S AR 1 /6 Tilton Road 7 5 4 J AR-1 8 2 PU (]) > '- 0 ~ 0 0 '- (]) > (/) 9 /5 PUD RM S /I /2 /J U -------------î I I U I Community Development t RZ 99-001 Geographic Information Systems Map revised November 19, 1998 _ mop _ -. """"*'" tor gononI_ ond ........,. _ frii· _..., __ -. __ to ",.,..tdo.. _"",,",ond - N ~ ___... ""'..... tor..... ologolly __ Land Use Ernest Bodine 10 u 12 RU 7 IJ ¡Tilton Rood I~ ------------ ~ RS 16 J B 2 () > I.... RU 0 .::f. 0 0 I I I.... () I I > I I .- Ul 9 I I I I I 1 IS I I I 1 I I I -I I I I I I /I I 12 IJ H I I -------------1 I I I I I 1 I RZ 99-001 Community Development t Geographic Information Systems Map revised November 19. 1998 1NI mop _ boon COft1'Iod tar--'pOrmg ... -.nee _ odt· - .-¡ -. - boon .- 10 ~ ... -"'"""'... ....... N __ ~,k" not_ tar... _ ologollybindng- \.I v PUBLIC HEARING ERNEST BODINE FILE NO. RZ-99-001 Chairman Wesloski explained the Planning and Zoning Commission hearing procedures. Mr. Hank Flores presented staff comments. Mr. Flores stated that he was presenting the petition of Ernest Bodine for a Change in Zoning from the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) Zoning District for 9.70 acres ofland located on the South side of Tilton Road, approximately 1,600 feet west of Silver Oak Drive. Mr. Flores stated that the surrounding zoning to the subject property is AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) to the north and east. RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre) is located to the south, east, and west. Mr. Flores stated that the petitioner has requested this change in zoning in order to develop a single- family home with horses and other livestock as accessory uses. He stated that the subject property is in an area of non-conforming horse ranches and across Tilton Road to the north are two conforming horse fanns. Mr. Flores stated that staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms with the standards of review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff is, therefore, recommending that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions for Mr. Flores. Mr. Matthes asked Mr. Flores if the petitioner is aware of a possible MSBU (Municipal Services Benefits Unit) for roadway and utility improvements in this area in the future. Mr. Flores stated that he is not sure if the petitioner is aware. Mr. Matthes stated that the staff report indicates Tilton Road has a right-of-way o( 100 foot. He stated that the maps he has in his office show 80 foot and asked Mr. Flores if a 20 foot dedication had been done recently. Mr. Flores stated that he would double check this. Mr. Matthes stated that Leonard Road is part of Tilton Road in future programming that the County has for an alternate U.S. 1 corridor. He stated that the ultimate need of right-of-way is 130 feet and asked Mr. Flores if the petitioner has been spoken to about possible dedication of a portion ofthat 130 feet. 4 v \.,J Mr. Flores stated that stãffhas not gone into that depth of detail. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any other questions for Mr. Flores. Chairman Wesloski asked Mr. Bodine ifhe would like to address the Board. Mr. Ernest Bodine, 2501 SE Leithgow Street, Port St. Lucie, addressed the Board. Chairman Wesloski asked Mr. Bodine ifhe had any comments about the petition or would he like to address the questions. Mr. Bodine stated that he has always wanted a little piece ofland, and a little farm. His grandfather was a farmer and had 50 acres ofland. Before his grandfather died, he remarried, and the farm that was supposed to go to his family was ~eft to his grandfather's wife and ultimately when she died it went to her side of the family. He stated that his family never received even a little piece of it. He could never have anything like what his grandfather had, but he finally found his little piece and he just wants to work it, put some· animals on it and a house, and that's his heart's desire. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions for Mr. Bodine. Mr. Matthes asked Mr. Bodine if he is aware this area could possibly be a MSBU (Municipal Services Benefits Unit) District. Mr. Bodine stated yes. Mr. Matthes asked Mr. Bodine if he is aware that approximately 130 feet of right-of-way will be required on the front of his property. Mr. Bodine stated that he is aware that it would be substantial, but he is not certain of the exact footage. Mr. Lounds asked Mr. Flores to confirm that the surrounding properties can accommodate five dwellings per acre. Mr. Flores stated that is correct. Mr. Lounds asked Mr. Bodine if this will impede the ideas he has in mind for his property. Mr. Bodine stated that the current zoning of his property is five dwellings per acre. He stated that he has no desire to develop five dwellings. Mr. Lounds asked Mr. Bodine if he has a problem with the surrounding properties having five dwellings to acre. 5 v v Mr. Bodine stated no. He stated that there are other farms in the area that are zoned AR-1. Mr. Merritt stated that because of the wetlands in the area this will preclude most of the five units per acre. Mr. Matthes asked Mr. Bodine if the property is currently vacant or is there an existing single-family dwelling unit on it. Mr. Bodine stated that the property is currently vacant and wooded with no dwellings on the property. Chainnan Wesloski asked ·if there were any further questions. At this time, Chainnan Wesloski opened the public heanng. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone that would like to speak in favor of this petition. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone that would like to speak in opposition of this petition. Hearing no further arguments in favor of or in opposition to the petition, Chairman Wesloski closed the public portion of the hearing. Chainnan Wesloski asked if there were any further questions of the petitioner. Chainnan Wesloski stated that the record should reflect Ms. Dreyer arrived at 7:19 p.m. Chainnan Wesloski asked if there were any further questions of staff. Chainnan Wesloski asked what would be the pleasure of the Board. After considering the testimony prèsented during the public hearing, including staff comments, and the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, Mr. Merritt moved that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to the application of Ernest Bodine for a Change in Zoning 1Ìom the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 duJacre) Zoning District to the AR-l (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/acre) Zoning District siI~ce there are no objections 1Ì~m any of the surrounding property owners, and there is existing AR-l zoning in the area. He stated that he believes it is appropriate to grant the change in zoning. Mr. Lounds seconded the motion, and upon roll call the motion was approved 7-0. Chainnan Wesloski stated that the petition would be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. 6 v '-' AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 1999 7:00 P.M Petition of Ernest Bodine, for a Change in Zoningfrom the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple_ Family - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the AR-l (Agricultural, Residential _ I du/acre) Zoning District for the following described property: (Locmion: South side of TOton Road, apProximately 1,600 feet West of Silver Oak Drive) THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AIL4BLE UPON REQUEST If it becomes necessary, thesepablic hearings may be cOn/inued from time to time_ Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matier considered at sueh meeting or hearing, hewill need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifYing during a hearing will be SWOrn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an 0pporlunity to cross-examine any individual testifYing during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adja~ent property owners on January 7, 1999. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on January 7, 1999. FILE NO. RZ-99-001 \.I ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD Of COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA JANUARY 19, 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY COf\CERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section 11.00.03 01 the SI. Lucie County Land Devel- opment Code and in accordance with the provisions 01 the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the lollowing applicants have requested that the SI. Lucie County Boord 01 County Commissioners consider their request as lollows: .1. Ernest Bodine, for a Change in Zoning from the RM-5 (ResIden- tial, Multiple-family - 5 du/aae) , Zoning DistrIct tb the AR-l (Agri- cultural, Residential - 1 du/aae) Zoning District for the lollawing desaibedproperty: SI. Lucie Gardens, Section 23, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, 810ck 3, Lot 6, Jess the South 10 feet and less. rood right-of-way (9.62 ac) (Map 34/23S) (OR 981- 1505 thru 1508) (Tax !.D. No. 3414-501-0706-000/7). . (Location: South side of Tilton Rood, approximately 1,600 feet West of Silver Oak Drive) PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the County Commission Cham- bers, 3rd Roor 01 the Roger Poitras Administration Annex Building, 2300 VirgInia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida bn January 19, 1999, beginning at 7:00 P.M. or, as soon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, If a person decides to appeal any deci- sion mode by a boord, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearIng, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that 0 verbatim record of ·the pro- ceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evi- dence upon which the appeal is to be based. . 2. The Fort Pierce Air Center has applied for a Major Adjustment to their existing Conditional Use operations at the SI. Lucie· County International Airport. The fort Pierce Air Center has been operat- ing os a Fixed 8ase Operations Center (FBO) on a 21.0 aae leased parcel since 1987. This FBO is located on the western side of the existing airpart grou~ds. The propased Major Adjustment is to add 3,360 square leet of office space to Hangar 4, lor a Iotal 01 38,666 square leet lor the follow- ing desaibed property: A parcel of land lying in and being a part of Section 30, T own- ship 34 South, Range 40 East, SI. Lucie County, Florida, and being more porticularly described as lollows: . Commencing at the southeast corner of Section 30, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, SI. Lucie County, Florida; thence North 00"00'16" West, along the east line of the southeast ~ of said Sec- tion 30 for 0 distance 01 2665.52 leet to an' iron rad at the eXjsting centerline-Intersection of Runways 4 and 14, of the SI. Lucie County International Airport; thence run South 45"00'00'" west, along the existing centerlin~ol Runwqr 4 lor o distance of 464.00 leet;. thence South 45°00'00" East for; a. dis- tance 01 11.00 feet to the Point 01 Beginning; thence run North 45"00'00" West for a distance 01 600.00 feet; thence run __South 45°00'00" West for a distance 01 800.00 leet; thence run South 45°00'00. East lor a distance· 01 600.00 leet; thence run North 45"00'00" East lor 0 distance 01 800.00 feet to the Point 01 Beginning and to dose. (Port 01 Tax J.D. No. 1430-131-0001-000/4). Containing 11.02 aaes morè or less . (Location: SI. Lucie County hiter- national Airport; Hangar 4) ;) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, flORIDA /S/ PAULA A. LEWIS, CHAIRMAN Pub.: Jan. 7, 1999 - -.J n¿ llwJ s '-' ....J No. 6141 COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 30. TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 00° 00' 16" WEST. ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST Va OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR A DISTANCE OF 266S.S2 FEET TO AN IRON ROD AT THE EXISTING CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF RUNWAYS 4 AND 14, OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 45' 00' 00' WEST. ALONG THE EXISTING CENTERLINE OF RUNWAY 4 FOR A DISTANCE OF 464.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4S' 00' 00' EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 11.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 4S' 00' 00' WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 600.00 FEET: THENCE RUN SOUTH 4S' 00' 00· WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 800.00 FEET: THENCE RUN SOUTH 45° 00' 00' EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 600,00 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 45° 00' 00' EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 800.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND TO CLOSE. (Part of Tax I.D. No. 1430-131-0001-000/4). CONTAINING 11.02 ACRES MORE OR LESS (Loca1lon: St. Lucie County Inlema1lonal Airport; Hangar 4) ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA JANUARY 19. 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE Is hereby given In accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code.-and In accordance with the provisions of the SI. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have .requested that the St.. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: 1.Ernest Bodine, tor a Change In Zoning from the RM-5 (Residential. Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural. Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District for the tollowing described property: St. Lucie Gardens. SectIon 23. Township 36 South. Range 40 East. Block 3. Lot 6. less the South 10 leet and less road rlghl-of-way (9.62 ac) (Map 34/235) (OR 981-1S0S Ihru lS08) (Tax I.D. No. 3414-501-0706-000/7). (Location: South side of TIlton I Road. approximately 1.600 feel West of Silver Oak DrIve) 2. The Fort Pierce Air Cenler has applied for a Major Adjustment to their existing Conditional Use operations at the St. Lucie County International Airport. The Fort Pierce Air Center has been operafing as a Fixed: Base Operations Center (FBO) on a 21.0 acreJeased parcél since 1987. This FBO is located on the western side of the existing airport grounds. The proposed Major Adjustment is to add 3.360 square feet of office space to Hangar 4. for a total of 38,666 square feet for the following described property: PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held In the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex Building. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on January 19. 1999. beginning at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.01 05, Florida Statutes. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, -he will need a' record - of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is to be based. A PARCEL OF lAND LYING IN AND BEING A PART OF SECTION 30. TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH. RANGE 40 EAST. ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA. AND BEING MORE PARTICUlARLY DESCRIBED ÞS FOLLOWS: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORiDA í fl" b WIt.<- ISI PAULA A. LEWIS, CHAIRMAN Publish: January 7. 1999 "-' '-' PLMTNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 12/16/98 File Number RZ-99-001 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENTOFCO~DEVELOPMENT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Planning and Zoning Commission Planning Manager ~~ December 9, 1998 Application of Ernest Bodine, for a Change in Zoning from RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/ac) Zoning to AR-l (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning. LOCATION: South side of Tilton Road, approximately 1600 feet west of Silver Oak Drive. EXISTING ZONING: RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/ac) PROPOSED ZONING: AR-l (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/ac) FUTURE LAND USE: RM (Residential, Mediwn) PARCEL SIZE: 9.70 acres PROPOSED USE: Single Family Dwelling with horses and other livestock SURROUNDING ZONING: AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/ac) is located to the north and east. RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/ac) is located to the south, east, and west. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing use surrounding the property is agricultural and residentiá1. Several confonning and non- confonning horse fanTIS are in the area. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is RM (Residential, Mediwn). FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #3 (250 West Prima Vista Boulevard), is located approximately 3 miles to the west. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property will be served by an on-site well and septic system. '-' . ~ December 17, 1998 Page 2 Petition: Ernest Bodine File No: RZ-99-001 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: The existing right-of-way for Tilton Road is 100 feet. None. . . TYPKOF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Concurrency Deferral Affidavit. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following detenninations: 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions ofthe St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed zoning district is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The AR-1 Zoning District is compatible with the RM Future Land Use and allows horses and other livestock as an accessory use to a single- family dwelling unit. 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; -.' The proposed change in zoning is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The RM Land Use is compatible with the AR-1 Zoning District. 3. Whether and th~ extent to which the prop.osed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The proposed zoning is consistent with existing and proposed land uses in the area. The general use of the immediate surrounding area of the subject property is vacant and residential. Across Tilton Road to the north are two confonning horse farms located within the AR-1 Zoning District. There are several non-confonning horse farms and ranches in the area along Silver Oak drive. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; Conditions have not changed so as to require an amendment. '-' . "" December 1 7, 1998 Page 3 Petition: Ernest Bodine -File No: RZ-99-001 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; The intended use for this rezoning is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The applicant will be required to comply with all federal, state, and local environmental regulations when building the single-family residence and horse barn. 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; An orderly and logical development pattern will occur with this change in zoning. The surrounding parcels of property are designated for residential and some agricultural uses. The rezoning of the subject property to the AR-l Zoning District will allow for a decrease in residential density from 5 du/ac to 1 dulac. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. COMMENTS The petitioner, Ernest Bodine has requested this change in zoning from RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 dulac) to AR-I (Agricultural, Residential- 1 dulac) Zoning in order to develop a single family home with horses and other livestock as an accessory use. The subject property is in an area of non-conforming horse ranches. Across Tilton Road to the north are two conforming horse farms. Staffhas reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms with the standards of review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approvaL December 17, 1998 Page 4 \..; """" Petition: Ernest Bodine File No: RZ-99-001 Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment hf cc: Ernest Bodine File '-' -...; ~~ O~ 1£\ ...... ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0\ ~ .:2. ~ 1£\ 0 '<t 00 1£\ 1£\ 1£\ 0\ ~ 1£\ 00\ '<t ~ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ ...... 0\ ~ M'<t M 1£\ '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t ~ '<t M M M ...... M M M M M '<t M ~ i¡i .....:1.....:1 .....:I < .....:I .....:I .....:I .....:I .....:I >-.....:1 ~~ ~ p.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ex:> en I > 0 ::r: z I U ex:> ::r: < ....- ~ U ~ µ: ~ ~ ~ ;:j < ~ 0 ~ ; ~ 0 0 0 U ~ 0 B ::E U ::> ::> ::> >- z ::> ~ 0 .....:I ø::: .....:I .....:I .....:I ¡..... 0 .....:I ;; >- ~ ¡..... < ~ ¡..... ¡..... ¡..... 0 ¡..... ¡..... p.. - z ~ en ~ p.. en en en en "-< .....:I ~ ¡..... en ~ ~ ~ ~ ::E 0 ¡..... .... ~ .....:I en ¡:: .....:I ::E p::: ..... 0 ~ û ~ 0 0 0 0 0 < ~ 0 ~ ::r: - p.. p.. ~ p.. p.. p.. p.. ~ p.. t- 0\ ...... >- ~ < en ::: ~ ¡..... ~ en ,...:¡ ø::: ::: ~ ¡..... ~ ø::: 0 ~ en ø.. ~ 0 ø::: ~ ~ ¡g ø::: 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 5 I I ::E ~ ~ < ~ 0 5 z 5 55 ~ &3 en ~ :E 0 .....:I .....:I ~ è'S ~ ~ ¡..... ~ ::: >- ~ .....:I .....:I ~ j ~ z p.. f:: f:: f:: en ~ en ~ 1£\ 0 M 0 M ~ en ...... '<t ~ 0 M 0 0 ...... 1£\ ...... ~ \D 0 \D ...... ...... t- t- oo 1£\ ~ 0 0\ 0 1£\ - \D ~ ...... M ...... '<t 0\ 00 00 M 1£\ ~ rI: 8 p..~ IU .....:I~ - en rI: ¡:)< (:; ~ zo :> <...... = « ~::r: 0 0 en~ ~ - M - C'J ~ ~ ~ 8 IU U.....:I "" e 5ê 0.....:1 § ~ en ~~ .s CJ U :a en ~ ~ c.. ø::: ~ C'J ~ en § "" ~ bI) en 0 ;! ~ ~ < ~ ~~ p.. < '" IU ~ ~ ~ >- - = 0 ::E U = .... ::E 2' ffi a( IU'O ::> < ~ ~~ 8 0 U ;S ¡..... p.. a( < .....:I ~ c..:Q ~ .....:I '-' ~ ;;2~ ¡..... - .....:I .....:I Z ;;2 .$- ~ 0 .....:I - ~ en ø::: ~ ~ - :3 ~ z ~ ::>~ IU rI: ~ æ z > ;g 0 ~ :32 ¡:: ~ ~ g: U 0 0 ~~ ~ 0 0 en ~ en ø::: u ~~ p.. ~~ ~ Z .....:I ~ cr.î ~ >-~ cr.î .....:I ~ þ. f.-¡ 0 0 .....:I~ Q. ~ ~ 0 i ~ N N ~ """z ... ....c en en en ~ U ~ ~ u >...... =0 e ::So ::E 0 en ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 p:::~ 8d-- ~ ø::: ~ 0 ¡..... ¡..... <0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ø::: en en en en ~~ 80\ B ~i § r-- ...... M S2 0\ t- ~ \D ...... ...... 0\ -- -- -- -- õ -- õ -- -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 '(;. 0 0 0 0 1£\ 0 0 0 1£\ 0 0 0 0 0 0 "t 0 0 ~ ~ 0 0 - - ~ I I I I . ~ I . I I t 0\ ~ '<t 1£\ 1£\ \D r-- r-- 00 M = .~ 0 ...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¡::: ~ IU~ \D \D r-- r-- r-- r-- r-- t- r-- t- 8 bI) Š 0 S' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S'o ~ I I I . I I I . . ...... ...... ...... - ...... ...... - ...... - ...... Õ>. 1:: = : 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c:=:= 1£\ 1£\ 1£\ 1£\ 1£\ 1£\ 1£\ 1£\ .,.. 1£\ I£\t:: I I I I . I I I I I . V c.. .; ~ '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t p.. ~~ ~ ...... ...... ...... - ...... ...... ...... ...... ...... - ...... 0 S; '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t .. M M M M M M M M M M Mp.. v '-" AGENDA REQUEST ~TEM NO. 4ß DATE: 01/19/99 CONSENT REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ X Leg. [ ] Quasi-JD [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Community Development SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 99-006 approving the request f the Ft. Pierce Air Center for a Major Adjustment to the Existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport for Property Located at 2982 Aviation Way, St. Lucie County International Airport. BACKGROUND: The Ft. pierce Air Center, has submitted an application for a Major Adjustment to the Existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport for the project known as Ft. Pierce Air Center -Hangar 4A West to allow for the addition of 3,360 square feet of office space for a total of 38,666 square feet of space for property located at 2982 Aviation Way, St. Lucie County International Airport. FUNDS AVAILABLE' N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On September 2, 1997, this. Board approved a major adjustment to the St. Lucie County International Airport for an additional 12,250 square feet of space to the Ft. Pierce Air Center. On February 17, 1998, this Board approved the addition of 13,000 square feet of space consisting of 12,000 square feet of hangar space and 1,000 square feet of office space to the Ft. Pierce Air Center RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 99-006 authorizing a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport. DENIED as M. Anderson ty Administrator ~S::::O:::'ON; [ ] OTHER: Review and ~prova1s County Attorney: Management & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Department: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) ~ -...I 4~ COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: 01119/99 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Community Development Director Date: January 13, 1999 Subject: Consider Resolution 99-006 approving the request of The Ft Pierce Air Center- Hangar 4A West for a Major Adjustment to the Existing Conditional Use at the St Lucie County International Airport for Property Located at 2982 Aviation Way, St. Lucie County International Airport. The F1. Pierce Air Center-Hangar 4A West has applied for a major adjustment to the existing S1. Lucie County International AiIport Conditional Use to for the addition of 3,360 square feet of office space for a total of 38,666 square feet of space for property located at 2982 Aviation Way. Because the proposed project is to be constructed on Airport property, and as such is a part of the airport's conditional use, approval by the S1. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners is required. The Airport Manager has reviewed the request for a major adjustment and has no problems with the proposaL Staff has reviewed the request for a major adjustment to an existing conditional use and has determined that it is consistent with the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Airport Master Plan. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 99-006, if approved, would grant this request for a Major Adjustment to the S1. Lucie County International Airport Existing Conditional Use. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 99-006. SUBMITTED: Ra Co cc: aul Phi11ips R. Errol Houck Ernesto Velasco, P.E. File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 '-" ...¡ RESOLUTION 99-006 FILE NO.: BCC-99-002\SP-98-057-R A RESOLUTION GRANTING A MAJOR ADJUSTMENT TO THE EXISTING ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CONDITIONAL USE FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS THE FT. PIERCE AIR CENTER - HANGAR 4A WEST WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Pursuant to Section 3.3.122(7) ofthe St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance, effective July 1, 1984, and Section 3.01.03(W)(7)(a) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, effective August 1, 1990, the St. Lucie County International Airport is considered to be an existing Conditional Use. 2. The Ft. Pierce Air Center has applied for a major adjustment to their existing conditional use operations at the St. Lucie County International Airport to allow for the development of Hangar 7 West. The Ft. Pierce Air Center has been operating as a Fixed Base Operations Center (FBO) on a 21.0 acre leased parcel since 1987. This FBO is located on the western side of the existing airport grounds. Ft. Pierce Air Center has applied for a major adjustment to their existing conditional use to allow an additional 3,360 square feet of office space to an existing hangar for a total of 38,666 square feet of space. 3. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the proposed Major Adjustment to an Existing Conditional Use and found it to be in substantial conformity with the overall Airport Master Plan. 4. On January 19, 1999, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 5. The proposed Major Adjustment to an Existing Conditional Use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL YED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County , Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.07.05(E), ofthe St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Major Adjustment to the St. Lucie County International Airport Existing File No.: BCC-99-oo2\SP-98-057-R January 19, 1999 Resolution 99-006 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 '-' .....; Conditional Use of The Ft. Pierce Air Center-Hangar 4 West, is hereby approved for the property described as follows: A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN AND BEING PART OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SAID SECTION 30; TOWNSillP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE, RUN NORTH 00°00'16" WEST, ALONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST Y4 OF SAID SECTION 30, A DISTANCE OF 2,665.52 FEET TO THE EXISTING CENTERLINE OF THE INTERSECTION OF RUNWAYS 4 AND 14, OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT; THENCE, RUN SOUTH 45°00'00" WEST, ALONG THE EXISTING CENTERLINE OF RUNWAY 4, A DISTANCE OF 464.00 FEET; THENCE, RUN SOUTH 45°00'00" EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 11.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE, RUN NORTH 45°00'00" WEST, FOR A DISTANCE OF 600.00 FEET; THENCE, RUN SOUTH 45°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 800.00 FEET; THENCE, RUN SOUTH 45 00'00" EAST, FOR A DISTANCE OF 600.00 FEET; THENCE, RUN NORTH 45°00'00" EAST, FOR A DISTANCE OF 800.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND TO CLOSE. (Tax ID#: Part of 1430-131-0001-000/4). (Location: 2982 Aviation Way. St. Lucie County International Airport.) B. The approval granted under the. Major Adjustment to an Existing Conditional Use approval shall expire on January 19, 2000, unless a building pennit is issued or an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.07.04(f) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. C. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on January 19, 1999, shall remain valid for the period of Conditional Use approval. Should the Conditional Use approval granted by this resolution expire or an extension be sought pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. D. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chainnan Paula A. Lewis. xxx Vice-Chainnan John D. Bruhn xxx File No.: BCC-99-002\SP-98-057-R January 19, 1999 Resolution 99-006 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 '-' Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Cliff Barnes "" xxx xxx xxx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 19th Day of January 1999. ATTEST: Deputy Clerk hf H:IWPIRESOLUTI.N\FINISHED.99\FP ACHGR4.CU\FP ACHGR4.RES File No.: BCC-99-oo2\SP-98-057-R January 19, 1999 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chainnan APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney Resolution 99-006 Page 3 '-' "'- Q) of-' C N Q) 0 ~ 0 0 "'- "'- I <c ro (j) 0) (j) .\\ Q) C ~ ro c () 0 0 "'- I 0 c Q) \ .- CO 0.... u \ '-é; Œ :-; ~~ ~ ~Z of-' ~- LL ~ '" '" æ ~ ::> 0 Ü a: ~ a: ~ æ Z « is ~ .. ~: 0 :. 4 ~'œ ~ , u ~, w, ~: ~, ¡: ~, z co, ~, , , , t- '" S v£ ....., ~~ z '" g; ~ E 0> '" " ~ gi '" '" E '" Q. U) . 0 " -" w '" 0 ~ J ( J~}(.i.-\\ > ~ u '" '" '" · "\()~t.t>-c.\\ "" E " u >. .... u ¡ ~ ~ ~ G · " " r ( · " "- 0 E u E -" :; ~ 0 Q. :>: u '" .... bD 0 '" " :;:; æ ~ z u ~ ::> o ü ovOI:! NNHS O'f'Oij )NIl 3~NVij a,oti 3~OltfBMotU aYOH w ~ z ~ ~ w .., z ~ Œ o ~ NOllHVJ aYOH æ OVOH 03JNS ..2-) 'YNYJ £ -J VNVJ > ~ ~ w .., z ~ Œ o ~o"tI :;; æ "" <0 S£ S 9£ AlNnO:J 3380H:J33>tO Zoning Ft. Pierce Air Center - Hangar 4 u J IL IL F.P.F.D.D. ~1Io. 26 BCC 99-002 s,,_~. D CG [CGT IlL I Community Development ~ Geographic Information Systems Map prepared December 29. 1998 tt-. rMp hM ÞewI ~ forlllll'18rlllpllwnng Md..-.no. ~ orir· N Wt* fNWf eftoIt t.. MM n'IIIde to provide .. mœt o.mwt rod KO.IfMe ntotmMIon poaIbM,... not iI'ItIInc»d forUM .. . ~ binding ~ [Ig IX Land Use Ft. Pierce Air Center - Hangar 4 T/U ] T/U ~ o T/U ... .; ~ ~ -~ r.p.r.D.D. ~"". 26 BCC 99-002 CgfM T IIND I Community Development ~ -<. Geographic Information Systems Map prepared December 29. 1998 o INDI 0 St. Lucie Boulevard ThiI rNP hM bMn compiled lor o-n-I pIMnWIg end ........ ~ orltt· N WhIIi ~ .øort hM bMn nwiI to ~ .. moet CU1M end .au.. hIonNdon pouI)II.l. not~ kwLU . . IIIg.t¡ IWdng ~ '--' '-'t/- AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, JANUARY 19, 1999 7:00 P.M Petition of FORT PIERCE AIR CENTER, for a Major Adjustment to their existing Conditional Use operations at the St. Lucie County International Airport. The proposed Major Adjustment is to add 3,360 square feet of office space to Hangar 4, for a total of 38,666 square feet for the following described property: (Location: St. Lucie County International Airport; Hangar 4) THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. ., Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners on January 7, 1999. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on January 7, 1999. FILE NO. BCC-99-002 ~. ...".¡ ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA JANUARY 19, 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the SI. Lucie County land Devel- opment Code and in accordance with the provisions of the SI. lucie County Comprehensive Plan, ,hot the following applicants have requested that the SI. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners cons ider their request as follows: .1. Ernest Bodine, for a Change in Zoning from the RM-5 (Residen- tial, Multiple-Family - 5 du/aae) Zoni ng District to the \6.R -1 . (Agri- cultural, Residential - 1 du/aae) Zoning District for· the following described property: SI. lucie Gardens, Section 23, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, Block 3, lot 6, less the South 10. feet and less road right-of-way (9.62 ac) (Map 34/23S) (OR 9Bl- 1505 thru 1508) (Tax I.D. No. 3414-501-0706-000/7). .(location: South side of Tilton Road, approximately 1,600 feet West of Silver Oak Drive) 2. The Fort Pierce Air Center has applied for a Major Adjustment to their existing Conditional Use operations at the St. lucie County· International Airport. The Fort Pierce Air Center has been operat- ing as a Fixed Base Operations Center (FBO) on a 21.0 aae leased porcel since 1987. This FBO is located on the westerI' side of the existing airport gro\lnds. The proposed Major Adjustment is to odd 3,360 square feet of office space to Hangar 4, for 0 total of 38,666 square feet for the follow- ing described property: A porcel of land lying in and being a port of Section 30, T own- ship 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, and being more particularly descr.ibed as follows: :" Commencing at the southeast corner of Section 30, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, SI. lude County, Florida; thence North 00°00'16" West, along the . east line of the southeast V. of said Sec- tion 30 for a distance of 2665.52· feet to an' iron rod at the existing centerline intenection of Rúnways 4 and 14, of the SI. Lucie County International Airport; thence run South 45"00'00'\ west, along the existing centerline ·of Runw~r 4 for a distance of 464.00 feet; .thence South 45°00'00" East for io,dis-' tance of 11.00 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence run .North 45°00'00" West for a distance of 600.00 feet; thence run ..~.outh 45°00'00" West for a distance of 800.00 feet; thence run South 45°00'00' East for a distance· of 600.00 feet; thence run North 45°00'00" East for a distance of 800.00 feet tò the Point of Beginning and to close. (Port of Tax I.D. No. 1430-131-0001-000/4). Containing 11.02 aaes more or less . (Location: SI. lucie County hiter-- national Airport; Hangar 4) . PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the County Commission Cham- bers, 3rd floar of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on January 1 9. 1999, beginning at 7:00 P.M. or as soan thereafter as passible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.01 05, Florida Statutes, if a person decides to appeal anydeci- sian made by a board, agency. or commission with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or heari ng, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the pro- ceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evi· dence upon which the appeal Is to be based. . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ PAULA A. LEWIS, CHAIRMAN Pub.: Jan. 7, 1999 íl¿ lLùJS -.,. COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF SECTION 30, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; THENCE NORTH 00· DO' 16· WEST, AlONG THE EAST LINE OF THE SOUTHEAST V. OF SAID SECTION 30 FOR A DISTANCE OF 266S.S2 FEET TO AN IRON ROD AT THE EXISTING CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF RUNWAYS 4 AND 14, OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIONAl AIRPORT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 4So 00' 00· WEST, AlONG THE EXISTING CENTERLINE OF RUNWAY 4 FOR A DISTANCE OF 464.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 4S' 00' 00' EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 11.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE RUN NORTH 4So 00' 00· WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 600.00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 4S' 00' 00' WEST FOR A DISTANCE OF 800,00 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 45' 00' 00· EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 600,00 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 4S' 00' 00' EAST FOR A DISTANCE OF 800,00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND TO CLOSE. (Part of Tax I.D. No. 1430-131-0001-000/4). CONTAINING 11.02 ACRES MORE OR LESS No. 6141 ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA JANUARY 19. 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE Is hereby given In accordance with Section 11.00.03 of fhe St. Lucie County Land Development Code/ond In accordance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the .St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: I.Emest Bodine, for a Change in Zoning fiom the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the AR-l (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District for the following described properly: st. Lucie Gardens, SectIon 23, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, Block 3, Lot 6, less the South 1 0 feet and less road right-of-way (9,62 ac) (Map 34/23S) (OR 981-1S0S thru IS08) (Tax I.D. No, 3414-501-0706-000/7). (locaffon: 'SOuth sleIe of Tilton I Road, approxfmately 1.600 feet West of Silver Oak DrIve) 2. the Fort PIerce Air Center has applied for a Major Adjustment to their existing Conditional Use operations at the St. Lucie County International Alrporl. The Fort Pierce Air Center has been operating as a Fixed. Base Operations Center (FBO) on a 21.0 aère leased 'parcel since 1987. This FBO Is located on the western side of the I existing airport grounds. The proposed Major Adjustment Is to add 3,360 square feet of office space to Hangar 4, for a total of 38,666 square feet for the following described property: (location: Sf. Lucie County Intemaffonal Airport; Hangar 4) PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd tloor at the Roger Poitras Administration Annex Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on January 19, 1 999, beginning at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, If a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will .need a record of the , proceedings. and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is to be based. A PARCEL OF lAND LYING IN AND BEING A PART OF SECTION 30. TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA. AND BEING MORE PARTICUlARLY DESCRIBED !oS FOLLOWS: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA 151 PAULA A. LEWIS, CHAIRMAN Publish: January 7, 1999 'wi Î Il, b MLL · OJ 't: 0 U M \0 N 0 V) '<t 00 V) c.0\ 0\ 0\ 0\ Ñ '<t '<t '<t '<t M M M M i I rñ .....:¡ .....:¡ .....:¡I.....:¡ µ.. µ.. µ..~ i i w I U w wlw ~ U u1u .....:¡ ~ ~~ f-< W ww CI) ~ s::s:: I.g ~ f-< f-<f-< ~ ~~ 0 0 0 0 u ~ µ.. µ.. µ.. 00 C'\ C'\ .... µ.. oó "*' M 't:" "" ~ .?; .Q ¡:o W e 11) ~> ~ 'ü ~ < ... ;:: s:: :;; ~ .....:¡ N ~ rñ t:: ~ \0 0 ..... P:: .~ d ><: '" s:: ";; ES 0 '" < > ¡:o OJ "" CI) N 0 II) 't: 't: 00 00 0 ~ ..... 0\ M <: l- N N Ô >- f-< ¡:o i:2 c 0 CI) :I: w f-< CI) ~ i:2 < ~ ~ ¡:: 0 C,) .... ~ ~ 11) '" ..s E ~ e ê 11) ~ U U o(! ~ ;:: .... ... 0 :.-;: ~ ~ -~ ð 0 00 8 11) :I: 0 M C,) = OJ .... W A. .s 6 ~ 11) Ä: o(! U ... ~ õ) .....:¡ ~ Z > ~ ¡:o CI) e "" oS = >- .... ... f-< ¡ i:2 0 ~ :I: ~ f-< 0 ~ ~ < U '" ..:- ~ ~ CI) = 0 >- ~ ~ ª "" ~ < ~ '" s:: ... '" :;:: 0 = 11) ~ -¡¡ ~ 8 ¿ o(! ~ > u ] ..:.:: ~ ~ "" C,) w ~ < 11) ;:: u ~ > 0 0 ~ OJ - :I: ~ ~ '" ï= ... 6 0) Õ U .....:¡ :I "" ~ E t:: .....:¡ f-< ~ e ~ z w w CI) CI) e ... ::'!: ~ 0 "" U 0 0 0 ¡;.. 0 0 ... ... '7' 0 0 M OJ ..... N ... ... .Q 0 0 = Q '" 6 0 0 ~ Q J :I '7' '7' C'\ e C'\ tJ) Z § ..... ... N '<t ... I = ~ - .S! "i '<t ~ U - 0 .; t:: P.. 0 U I< ~ M M ~ ::; ~ C. '<t ::!: ~ ¡:o f-< < < ..... ~ - - - ..." , L '--' -....I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 4C DATE: January 19, 1999 CONSENT REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg. [x] Quasi-JD. TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Community Development SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 99-001 providing f a se ies of General Amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. BACKGROUND: Draft Ordinance 99-001 proposes a series of amendments to the County's Land Development Code. These amendments are general in nature and are as a result of specific requests of members of the Board, and staff initiated technical corrections to the County's Land Development Code. On January 5, 1999, this Board opened the first of the two required public hearings on these proposed amendments. At that hearing, the Board continued discussion on the first reading of Draft Ordinance 99-001 until January 19, 1999. This is the first of two (2) required public hearings on these amendments. The second required public hearing will be on February 2, 1999 @ 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board accept any public comments or testimony on Draft Ordinance 99-001 and announce that the second, and final, public hearing on Draft Ordinance 99-001 will be held on Tuesday, February 2, 1999 @ 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. COMMISSION ACTION: [[ y APPROVED [ VI OTHER: DENIED Move to Second Public Hearing. County Attorney: ffr· Coordination/Siqnatures Mgt & Budget: Purchasing: Other: Other: Originating Dept: Finance: (copies only): (AGEND407) "" i1./ '-" "-' 46 COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: January 19, 1999 Ordinance 99-001 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Ray Wazny, Community Development Director DATE: January 10, 1999 SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 99-001 providing for a series of General Amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Attached, is a copy of Draft Ordinance 99-001 which proposes a series of amendments to the County's Land Development Code. On January 5, 1999, this Board opened the first ofthe two required public hearings on these proposed amendments. At that hearing, the Board continued discussion on the first reading of Draft Ordinance 99-001 until January 19, 1999. The amendments included in Draft Ordinance 99-001 are: Section 2.00.00 Definitions: · Draft Ordinance 99-001 proposes to amend the definition of Hotel/ Motel clarifying the length of stay typically associated with these facilities. · This section proposes to amend the definition of Open Space to address the use of private property in the determination of open space and to add a new definition for areas considered to be Common Open Space. · This section proposed to create new definition for Temporary Buildings or Structure and Transient Lodging Facilities. Section 3.0 1.03(E) Zoning Districts: · This section amends the Accessory Use provisions of the AR-1 Zoning District to clarify the use of mobile homes, subject to meeting the standards set forth in Section 7.01.05 of this Code. As noted in our previous comments to the Board, Section 7.01.05 ofthe County's Land Development Code already specifically allows the placing of a mobile home as an Accessory Use to a bona fide agricultural operation in certain zoning districts, including the AR-1 Zoning District. This proposed amendment is solely for the purpose of correcting a topographic oversight in not including the required reference under the Accessory Use provisions of Section 3.0 1.03(E) of the St. Lucie County , .. ,., ..' '-' ......, January 10, 1998 Page 2 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-001 Section 4.01.05 Hutchinson Island - Building Height Overlay Zone · This amendment provides for clarification of existing vested development rights and for the ability to locate Telecommunication Towers on Hutchinson Island, subject to meeting the requirements of Section 7.10.23. At the Boards meeting of January 5, 1998, there were questions asked about the advisability of permitting Telecommunications Towers on the coastal barrier island. In reviewing this matter, it appears that the County does not have the ability under Federal regulation to specifically exclude the barrier island from being a location where telecommunications towers may be located. Our codes permit these kind of facilities as a Conditional Use in all of our zoning districts, with the exception of the IL, IH, U and Ag Zoning Districts. There must be some mechanism that allows for these facilities to at least be considered for location on the island. Section 4.01.00 of the county's land development code establishes maximum building heights for all structures on Hutchinson Island. The two height zones allow development to be either 35 feet or 125 feet high, depending on location and compliance with all other county codes. The submitted amendment to Section 4.0 1.05(x) is for the purpose of recognizing that these towers may be greater in height than 125 feet. Noting the comments made on January 5th, staff would recommend that this Section be amended to eliminate the current internal inconsistency, that does not allow for towers, antenna or antenna arrays in excess ofthe restrictions of Section 4.0 1.03. However, staff does recommended that given the distribution of the "A" Zones (125 foot high zones) on Hutchinson Island, it is within the realm of logical consideration that should a telecommunications provide wish to locate, or co-locate a tower, antenna or antenna array in the "A" Zones, adequate coverage for all of the islands can be maintained. It is therefore not necessary to extend this exemption from the building height restrictions to the "B" Zone properties. Additionally, there was a concern raised by the Conservation Alliance ofSt. Lucie County, Inc., at the Boards meeting of January 5, 1999 regarding the County's interpretation of Section 11.09.00 of the Land Development Code as it relates to the proposed amendment to Section 4.01.05(A). The Conservation Alliance has made a suggestion that additional language be added to this amendment ting this determination back to the County's vested rights regulations in Section 11.09.00 of the Land Development Code. When read in its entirety, the regulations set out in Section 11.09.00 of the Land Development Code do not conflict with the statements or intent of the proposed amendments. Staff has no objection to the proposed amendment, as submitted. Section 6.06.00 Mining Section 6.06.0 l(B)(11) Restrictions. Regulations. and Conditions on Mining Permit · The amendments to this Section clarify those areas of the county in which Mining activities are to be prohibited. Section 6.06.02(C) Extraction Incidental to Development Activities . This proposed amendment provides for an exemption for the construction of stormwater retention ,to ~ - '-' ....,,; January 10,1998 Page 3 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-001 be prohibited. Section 6.06.02(C) Extraction Incidental to Development Activities · This proposed amendment provides for an exemption for the construction of stormwater retention facilities associated with the construction of roadway projects. Section 7.01.00 Planned Unit Development Section 7.01.02 Authorized Uses · This section provides for a clarification of the authorized ~ses in a Planned Unit Development. As noted at the January 5, 1999 meeting of the County commission, currently when an application for Planned Unit Development is submitted for review, all of the uses the mentioned in the referenced zoning districts are considered to be potentially eligible uses in that PUD, subject to County Commission approval as part of the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Review Process.· If a use that is proposed is determined by the Board, through the public hearing process, to be inappropriate or incompatible with the proposed PUD and! or the surrounding area, then the Board has the ability to deny or modify the proposed PUD to eliminate or restrict the determined objectionable use. Section 7.01.03(a) Standards and Requirements · This amendment provides for change in the minimum size of a Planned Unit Development from 10 acres to five (5) acres. This change is necessary if, consistent with the general direction of the County Commission, the County is to encourage the use of the PUD zoning district for small scale development sites. The only other alternative is for a property owner is to seek a variance from these standards under the provisions of Section 10.00.00 of the Land Development Code. Section 7.01.03(e)(5) Standards and Requirements · This amendment provides for a clarification on the ability to use variable standards in road right-of- way widths in a Planned Unit Development. It has been the practice of the County to permit such variations, under broad interpretations of the provisions of the PUD regulations. However this amendment serves to further clarify the authority for granting such considerations. All construction must still be to County Code and it shall remain the responsibility of any applicant for PUD approval seeking to take advantage ofthis section to demonstrate compliance with the intent of the County's minimum ROW width standards. At the January 5, 1999, public hearing, The Conservation Alliance of St. Lucie County, Inc., presented an objection to this proposed amendment, and the subsequent amendment to the PNRD and PMUD section referencing the sem matter. Their objection reads as follows: 3. The amendment to Section £.5 on page 10 allows variations to the standard minimum right-ol-way widths in PUDS. This effectively exempts these developments from the state-mandated provisions of the comprehensive plan, which requires the county to "...develop and implement a COUNTY WIDE ~ ~ ....., January 10, 1998 Page 4 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-001 right of way protection regulation and Rightof Way Dedication Ordinance. II (policy 1.1.8.3) The minimum right-of way established in the Traffic Circulation Element of the Comprehensive Plan is 50 ft. (for Local Roads with closed drainage-curb and gutter, See Table 7.15, attachment B). This provision would allow higher intensity developments with substandard streets and utilities, resulting in traffic congestion, insufficient room for sidewalks and bicycle paths, and inadequate drainage. (This is also applicable to corresponding amendments for PNRD and PMUD on p. 13 and 16)" [Letter from the Conservation Alliance of St. Lucie County, Inc., dated January 5, 1999, to the St. Lucie County Commission, signed by K. Brian Killday, Vice President.] The assessments of this proposed amendment made by the Conservation Alliance on this item are not correct. The specific proposed amendment to Section 7.01.03(E)(5) reads as follows: · Streets in a Planned Unit Development may be dedicated to public use or retained under private ownership. Said streets and associated improvements shall comply with all pertinent County regulations and ordinances. however. variations to the standard minimum right-of- wav widths mav be considered as part of the Planned Unit Development if it is shown to the satisfaction ofthe Board of County Commissioners. that the requested variation is consistent with the intent of the County's roadwav construction standards and necessary for the design of the Planned Unit Development. The conservation alliance's concerns about this amendment allowing for" higher intensity developments with substandardstreets and utilities, resulting in traffic congestion, insufficient room for sidewalks and bicycle paths, and inadequate drainage" fails to consider that the second part of the proposed amendment requires that any County approval of a variable street design include a verification that the submitted design is consistent with the intent of the Countys basic roadway design standards and that the function of the proposed roadway be maintained. For example, if the road is to serve the functions of an arterial roadway, the roadway must be capable of carrying high volumes of traffic and the location of utilities must be in manner so not to imped traffic if repairs need to made to the utility. The conservation alliance comments include a reference to Policy 1.1.8.3 of the County's Comprehensive Plan. This Policy reads as follows; Policy 1.1.8.3 In conjunction with the Objectives and Policies of the Traffic Circulation Element, St. Lucie County shall develop and implement by August 1990 a county-wide right-of-way"protection regulation and Right-of-Way Dedication Ordinance. Section 7.05.00 ofthe County's Land Development Code addresses Transportation matters related to roadway construction in the County. This Section addresses the specific standards and requirements that must be meet in regard to new street construction, particularly as it effects major street construction. The proposed amendments to the County's Planned Development regulations are not intended to circumvent the County Right-of-way Protection Maps or dedication requirements for roadways on the County's Thoroughfare Protection Plan. Section 7.01.03(1) Standards and Requirements · January 10,1998 Page 5 '-" \J Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-001 · These amendments clarifY what areas may be counted as Open Space. Section 7.02.00 Section 7.02.02 Planned Non-residential Development Pennitted Uses · This section clarifies the necessity of any proposed Telecommunications Tower to comply with the requirements of Section 7.10.23 of this Code. Section 7.02.03(B) Standards and Requirements · This amendment clarifies the ability to establish variable minimum lot standards in a Planned Non- Residential Development. Section 7.02.03(D) Standards And Requirements · This amendment provides for a clarification on the ability to use variable standards in road right-of- way widths in a Planned Non-Residential Development. It has been the practice of the County to pennit such variations, under broad interpretations of the provisions of the PNRD regulations. However this amendment serves to further clarifY the authority for granting such considerations. All construction must still be to County Code and it shall remain the responsibility of any applicant for PNRD approval seeking to take advantage of this section to demonstrate compliance with the intent of the County's minimum ROW width standards. Section 7.01.03Œ) Standards and Requirements · These amendments clarifY what areas may be counted as Open Space. Section 7.03.00 Section 7.03.02 Planned Mixed Use Development Pennitted Uses And Locations · This section provides for a clarification of the authorized uses III a Planned Mixed Use Developments. Section 7.03.03(£) Standards and Requirements · This amendment provides for a clarification on the ability to use variable standards in road right-of- way widths in a Planned Mixed Use Development. It has been the practice of the County to pennit such variations, under broad interpretations of the provisions of the PMUD regulations. However, this amendment serves to further clarifY the authority for granting such considerations. All construction must still be to County Code and it shall remain the responsibility of any applicant for PMUD approval seeking to take advantage ofthis section to demonstrate compliance with the intent ofthe County's minimum ROW width standards. Section 7.03.03(K) Standards and Requirements '-' '~ January 10, 1998 Page 6 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-001 · These amendments clarifY what areas may be counted as Open Space. Section 7.05.00 Transportation Svstems Section 7.05.02(A)(l0) Streets · This proposed amendment is to provide additional direction and guidance in the review of roadway construction plans for new County road projects and private development plans. Section 7.05.02(A)(13) Streets · This proposed amendment is to provides for additional direction and guidance in the required method of signing on local street and roads. Section 7.05.08Œ) Street Naming and Identification · This Section amends the authority for naming or renaming streets from the County Engineer to the Community Development Director. This is technical adjustment to bring both street address assignments, which already are administered by the Development Director, and street naming to the same Department. Section 7.06.00 Off-Street Parking and Loading Section 7.06.01 Generally · The amendments to this Section require that with any change in use, all current off-street parking standards and requirements shall be complied with. These amendments do not apply to businesses that utilize a common parking area, such as a shopping center or multi-tenant office complex. All parking lots constructed after the effective date of this amendment shall be required to paved with a County approved all weather surface. Section 7.06.02(A) Off-Street Parking · This Section amends the parking ratio for hotel and motel uses. This is to correct a scriveners error in the existing ratio which incorrectly sets the standard at one and one hundredth (1.01) space per guest unit as opposed to one and one tenth (1.1) space per guest unit. Section 7.06.02Œ) Off-Street Parking · The amendments in this section clarifY and reinforce existing regulations governing the applicability of these parking standards. This Section further re-enforces the parking restrictions within any required landscape area. 7.09.00 Landscaping and Screening · The amendments to this Section require that with any change in use, all current landscaping \w- ....¡ January 10, 1998 Page 7 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-001 standards and requirements shall be complied with. These amendments do not apply to businesses that utilize a common parking areas, such as a shopping center or multi-tenant office complex. Section 7.09.03(D) General Provisions · This section amends and strengthens the requirements for maintaining on-site landscaping. If violations of the requirements of this section are reported, they are to be prosecuted through the Code Enforcement Board. Section 7.09.03(E) Plant Materials · This section amends the minimum tree planting requirements by increasing the minimum height of all trees to be planted from ten (10) feet to twelve (12) feet. Twelve feet is consistent with the minimum landscaping requirements of the City of Port St. Lucie, and is similar to the minimum tree heights of other municipal landscaping regulations in the Treasure Coast Area. This section also provides for additional amendment to the minimum height of palm trees; the ability to group trees in order to achieve the minimum crown spread; the ability to use more than 50% palm plantings on Hutchinson Island if it is demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Community Development Director that the intent of this code is being complied with and that other species will not survive in high salt exposure areas; the minimum height of all required shrubs has been increased to thirty (30) inches on 18 inch planting centers; and all required landscaping shall be 100% native species to this region of Florida. The tree height and 100% native requirement are proposed to have a phased effective period in order to allow for adequate local plant stocks to be grown and made available. · In addition, the section strengthen the requirements for the use of existing native vegetation in the development of any required on-site landscape plan. Section 7.09.04 General Landscaping Requirements .. This section has been amended to strength and clarify the general landscape and design standards for the County. These standards are patterned after recent amendments to the Codes in the City of Port St. Lucie. · Paragraph J of this section establishes new minimum landscape standards applicable to certain types of agricultural production use and activities. It should be noted that these regulations do not apply to crop fields or to out buildings unless that are used for the production of animals. · Paragraph K provides for the establishment of minimum site lighting and shielding requirements where commercial uses are adjacent other residential and use. On October 15, 1998, the Local Planning AgencylPlanning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on Draft Ordinance 99-001. After that hearing, the LP A voted to recommended that the Board approve draft Ordinance 99-001, as amended and to defer any action on certain Sections of the original draft. Those Sections have been removed from the current draft of Ordinance 99-001 and will be scheduled for Board review at a latter date. ~ "-" January 10, 1998 Page 8 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-001 Staff recommends that the Board accept any additional public comments or testimony on Draft Ordinance 99-00 I and schedule the second required public hearing on Draft Ordinance 99-001 to be held on Tuesday, February 2, 1999 @ 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. If you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMITTED APPROVED AS TO FORM RW/DJMI OR9902m2(disk 8) cc: County Administrator Ass!- County Administrator County Attorney Planning Manager '-' ...",I 1 ORDINANCE NO. 99-001 2 3 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND 4 DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 2.00.00, DEFINITIONS, 5 TO PROVIDE FOR AMENDMENT TO THE DEFINITIONS OF 6 HOTEL/MOTEL AND OPEN SPACE; AND BY CREATI~G NEW 7 DEFINITIONS FOR COMMON OPEN SPACE, TEMPORAR¥)~aI!JILDINGS 8 OR STRUCTURE AND TRANSIENT LODGING F~CIS; BY 9 AMENDING SECTION 3.01.3(13), AGRICULTURAL RESI[)pN:1J1!1 (¡¡)NING 10 DISTRICT TO PROVIDE FOR A CLARIFIC~TION ONiINÍoBm(¡¡)ME~ 11 AS AN ACCESSORY USE; BY AME:NDINGSECTI0~\p1:0,,~< 12 HUTCHINSON _ ISLAND BUILDING ,. mihlT OVERLY 30NE, 13 EXCEPTIONS, TO PROVIDE FOR CLARIFICATIONS 14 PERTAINING TO VESTED SITE PLANS ANm MMUNICATIONS 15 TOWERS; BY AMENDING SECTIOirq 6. 1), MINING, 16 RESTRICTIONS, REGULATIONS ANQ, ONDITI A MINING 17 PERMIT TO CLARIFY THOSE AREAS,) 13 MINI VITIES ARE 18 PROHIBITED; BY AMENDING S.ECTIO , MINI~ EXTRACTION 19 INCIDENTAL TO DEVELOPMENT AC 1; ROVIDE FOR A 20 CLARIFICATION ON CONSTRUCTI.0N 0 WATER WORKS 21 ASSOCIATED WITH RO mWAY C0NSTRU N PROJECTS; BY 22 AMENDING SECTION 1.02, '1PLANN UNIT DEVELOPMENT, 23 PERMITTED USES ROV FO LARIFICA TION OF USES 24 ALLOWED; BY NDIN .;1 7.01.03, PLANNED UNIT 25 D OPMEN DARD EQUIREMENTS, BY REDUCING 26 IMU SIZ UIRED FOR A PLANNED UNIT 27 ENT, RIFYING THE ABILITY TO VARY FROM 28 T-O HSTANDARDSWITHINAPLANNEDUNIT 29 ND IFYING STANDARDS GOVERNING OPEN 30 PLA D UNIT DEVELOPMENT; BY AMENDING 31 NNED NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, 32 0 PROVIDE FOR CLARIFICATION OF USES 33 ING TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS; BY 34 CTION 7.02.03, PLANNED NON-RESIDENTIAL 35 DEVELOP~'iiiiiiii , STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS, BY CLARIFYING 36 REgølREMENTS FOR DETERMINATION OF MINIMUM SITE 37 10NAL REQUIREMENTS" BY CLARIFYING THE ABILITY TO 38 OM MINIMUM RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH STANDARDS WITHIN A - - - - - - - - - ünde~iTn-;; is for ~dd1tlon- - - - - - - -- 13t:t':'k(. 'Phitol:1::!"h is for deletion Double Underline or Otitik(. Out /Redline is change from 01/05/98 Bee meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 1 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 '-' ~ ..",; 1 PLANNED NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND BY CLARIFYING 2 STANDARDS GOVERNING OPEN SPACE WITHIN A PLANNED 3 NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT; BY AMENDING SECTION 7.03.02, 4 PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, PERMITTED USES AND 5 LOCATIONS TO PROVIDE FOR CLARIFICATION OF USES ALLOWED; 6 BY AMENDING SECTION 7.03.03, PLANNED ,MIXED!'!' USE 7 DEVELOPMENT, STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS IFYING 8 THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DETERMINAT OF M SITE 9 DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS, BY CLA NG T TY TO 10 VARY FROM MINIMUM RIGHT-OF-WAY STA ·..IN A 11 PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPME AN 12 STANDARDS GOVERNING OPEN SPAC 13 USE DEVELOPMENT; BY AMEN 14 TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, STREETS, 15 LANGUAGE WITH REGARD TO THE 16 METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGA 17 SIGNAGE STANDARDS; BY AME 18 NAMING AND NUMBERING, BY P 19 PROVIDING CLARIFICATION§: 20 NAMING; BY AMENDING S,aeTION 21 AND LOADING, BY PRO~~~ING ~:§ì DMENTS TO THIS 22 SECTION REQUIRING r REC<¡JQSTRUQ1¡~ ON OF PARKING LOTS 23 WITH ANY CHANGE I A" R THE :3FFECTIVE DATE OF THIS 24 ORDINANCE; BY ENDI SE ' N 7.06.02, OFF STREET 25 PAR lNG, BY DING RKING STANDARD FOR 26 H OTE 0 C AN INCORRECT NUMBER, BY 27 T L P ISIONS FOR WHEN OFF-STREET 28 RE ND WHERE OFF-STREET PARKING IS 29 Y A SECTION 7.09.00 LANDSCAPING AND 30 P E FOR A SERIES OF GENERAL 31 UIRI G THE REPLACEMENT OR UPDATING OF 32 CAPING WITH A CHANGE IN USE OR NEW 33 E, BY ENHANCING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR 34F PLA~TED LANDSCAPING AND PROVIDING 35 AMENDING THE GENERAL STANDARDS FOR PLANT 36 BY AMENDING SECTION 7.09.04 CLARIFYING THE 37 NTS FOR LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO A PUBLIC OR 38 TREET RIGHT -QF-WA Y, ABUTTING PROPERTIES PARKING 39 TERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS, BUFFER REQUIREMENTS ---------~~dTMisf~a~1tioo--------- ot:tikc '1'1u01:l9h is for deletion Double Underline or Ot:tikc Ol:lt /Redline is change from 01/05/98 BCC meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 2 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 '-' '...I BETWEEN NON-RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES, OFF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING AREAS AND BY CREATING NEW REGULATIONS GOVERNING ON-SITE LIGHTING STANDARDS AND LANDSCAPE AND SCREENING STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN AGRICULTURAL USE AND ACTIVITIES; BY PROVIDIN~jFOR CONFLICTING PROVISION, BY PROVIDING FOR ~EVERi~ILlTY, PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY, PROVIDING FOR FI/j~ITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, PROVIDING FO N E . DATE, PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND PROVID1, OR C ON. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners the following determination: made 1. On August 1, 1990, the Board of Coun County, Florida, adopted the St. Code. sioners of St. Lucie d Development 2. The Board of County amendments to the St. through the following Oihance -09 - 92-17 - 93-03 - 93-06 - 94-07 - 94-21 - 96-10 - 97-09 - 98-19 - 9x-xx - May 14, 1991 June 2, 1992 February 16, 1993 May 25, 1993 June 22, 1994 August 16, 1994 August 6, 1996 October 7, 1997 October 6, 1998 XXXXXXXXX xx, 19xx 1998, the Local Planning Agency/ Planning and on held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance notice in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune at ays prior to the hearing and recommended that the ordinance be approved. nuary 5, 1999, this Board held its first public hearing on the posed ordinance, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune on December 23, 1998, and ---------~~rlIMi;f~~d~tioo--------- Ot:rik~ 'fhLOt1gh is for deletion Double Underline or Ot:rik~ Ot1t /Redline is change from 01/05/98 BCC meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 3 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 '-' -.I continued this first public hearing until January 19, 1999. 5. On January 19, 1999, this Board reconvened the public hearing on the proposed ordinance and accepted additional public comments and testimony. 6. On February 2, 1999, this Board held its second the proposed ordinance, after publishin otic the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribu Janu 7. The proposed amendments to Development Code are consistent objectives and standards of the St. Lu and is in the best interest of the health citizens of St. Lucie County, Florida.' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED b Lucie County, Florida: PART A. COUNTY CODE AND COMPILED ********************** HAPTER II DEFINITIONS e following terms shall have the meanings herein ascribed to them. which lodging is provided or offered to the public for compensation. Qenerallv with ncies of less than four 4 weeks.. - - - - - - - - - underline "1; fo""i- -add1tl;;-n- - - - - - - -- St;:dk~ Tl.:t:O~9h is for deletion Double Underline or Ot;:t:ik~ Ollt /Redline is change from 01/05/98 Bee meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 4 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 JO 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 '-" '..I OPEN SPACE: Any parcel or area of land or water that is set aside, open and unobstructed to the sky, and designated or reserved for public or private use or enjoyment. Unless otherwise restricted in this code. open space may include private yards and those private yards may be fenced . OPEN SPACE, COMMON: A parcel or area of land or water in or related to a development site that,!is set asidêand desiQnated or reserved for the public or private use or enioyment of t~.~¡ir;~si~~~ts, occupants. and/or owners of the development or proiect site. Comm~~open s~~~~:!r€:~~~ shall not be individuall owned exce t b a reco nized unit of local o/1i;:ståte overÌ'ill"lÎè'_~an enti or orQanization acceptable to St. Lucie County. weeks III TRICTS 3.00.00 3.01.00 USE REGULATIONS L TURAL RESIDENTIAL - 1 Paragraphs 1 through 6 - no change ry uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following: ---------~~dIMisf~~d~Üoo--------- Ot:dkc. 'Fh:r,',)1:1:jh is for deletion Double Underline or Otrikc. Otlt /Redline is change from 01/05/98 Bee meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 5 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ~ 'J a. Agriculture (farms and ranches accessory to single-family detached dwelling). (01102) b. Animals, subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.03. (999) c. Guest house subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.04. (999) d. Mobile Home subiect to the requirements of Section 7.10.05. d:- e. Retail and wholesale trade - subordinate to the primary authorized use or activity. ******************************** CHAPTER I¡~t SPECIAL DISlJICTS¡¡¡W' - 4.01.00 HUTCHINSON ZONE HEIGHT OVERLAY 4.01.05 EXCEPTIONS The following structures are not subject to the A. .03.03 of this Code ursuant A:- B. &C. 6.0. E. orized public safety activity. ations transmission poles. a.F. ******************************** CHAPTER VI RCE PROTECTION STANDARDS ---------~~ctIMi;fœad~tioo--------- Ot:dkc. Tn.¡:otlgn. is for deletion Double Underline or Otrikc. Otlt /Redline is change from 01/05/98 Bee meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 6 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 6.06.01 2 3 A. J 4 5 6 8. 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 v ..I RESTRICTIONS, REGULATIONS, AND CONDITIONS ON MINING PERMIT It shall be illegal to excavate or mine, as defined in Chapter II, any real property in St. Lucie County without first obtaining a mining permit for such activity, except as exempted in Section 11.05.11. All mining operations conducted under authority of a permit issued in accordance withthe provisions of this Code shall be subject to the following restrictions, regulations, and Paragraphs 1 through 10- No 11. Environmentally Sensitive Areas: Mining shall not be permitted in the following a. Within any jurisdictional wetland Statutes, or within fifty (50) feet of an occur within an isolated jurisdictional Florida Water Management District as either "poor" or fair", and is enti d in Section Florida al wetland except that mining may s been determined by the South tablishing wetland quality lands, if and to the extent 1.) Alteration of such of this Code. âhce with Section 6.02.03 2.) environmental resource permits agement and Storage of Surface sources). Florida Statues, and; 3.) -site or at a mitigation site approved by St. etland littoral zone constructed in accord with 6.03 of this code may be counted towards this two hundred (200) feet of any desianated such 8n area... ithin two hundred feet of an area desi nated for conservation reservation or er form of resource rotection throu h the execution of a conservation easement or similar dedication in favor of St. Lucie County. the South Florida Water Manaaement District or other lawful entity recoanized by St. Lucie County; COBsta/lligh Ilazard ArM, or, - - - - - - - - - üiidedIne is iòr "ãdditlõñ - - - - - - - -- Ot:dk~ 'Pa.lðl:.9h is for deletion Double Underline or Otzik<. Out /Redline is change from 01/05/98 Bee meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 7 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 '-' ...I f. Dune Preservation Zone. 6.06.02 EXTRACTION INCIDENTAL TO DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES A. Temporary mining activities may be performed as part of the development an appro¥~d site plan, an approved conditional use permit, a Planned Development that has receiy~d prelirTlió'âry approval, or a Development of Regional Impact for which an Application for Dev ~Approval has been submitted and found sufficient for review by the Regional P ning C ided, however, that prior to undertaking such activities, all required local, st nd fe must be secur including obtaining a mining permit from the Board of C Comm required by ~ Section and Section 11.05.11. B. Construction of a stormwater management system ~ from the requirements of Section 6.06.01 (B)(1), applicable construction authorizations for that develop the South Florida Water Management District. C. Construction of a stormwater mana ement s stem in ntal to tuction of an linear roadwa construction or eXDansion Droiect shall be exemDMromithe reauirements~ofdnis Section Drovided that all aDDlicable construction authorizations for thåtKdevêlo!>ment havèj'èêri,issued by St. Lucie County and the South Florida Water Manaaement,Ðistrict\for,¡r,å'ådways not under the iurisdiction of the State of Florida or for roadways that are under the iurist\:lrGt.øiJi'œf~the State of Florida Drovided that all aDDlicable construction authorizations'tfor that de'leloDmë'm:a~ë;been issued by the South Florida Water Manaaement District. J.:" ' . CH "ER VII SIGN AND IMPROVEMENT NDARDS EVELOPMENT '·'itted. conditional or accessory use in the Agricultural-1 (AG-1); Agricultural-2.5 (AG-2.5); -5 (AG-5); Residential/Conservation in the Agricultural-1 (AG-1); Agricultural-2.5 (AG-2.5); ral-5 (AG-5); Residential/Conservation (RC); Residential, Estate-1 (RE-1); Residential, ---------~~rlT~i;f~ad~tioo--------- ot:.J:ik" ThJ::otl,:h is for deletion Double Underline or ot:.J::ik" Otlt:. /Redline is change from 01/05/98 Bee meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 8 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ~ .I Estate-2 (RE-2); Residential, Single-Family-2 (RS-2); Residential, Single-Family-3 (RS-3); Residential, Single-Family-4 (RS-4); Residential, Multiple-Family-5 (RM-5); Residential, Mobile Home- 5 (RMH-5); Residential, Multiple-Family-7 (RM-7); Residential, Multiple-Family-9 (RM-9); Residential, Multiple-Family-11 (RM-11); and Residential, Multiple-Family-15 (RM-15) zoning districts ofthis Code may be permitted in a Planned Unit Development District for a variety of subject to comDlvina with the residential densities described in Section 7.01.03(B). Uses ofthe types permitted iniW,~Commercial, Neighborhood (CN) District are also permitted up to an amount not to exceed thr~~;'~) percent of the gross area of the rlanned Unit Development. In addition, playgroundsI'~~,9:'.!c~n8fnon public parks, golf courses, countf') clubs, bicycle paths, racquet sp~rts f8eiliti~~~;:~~¡ß~J~g stables, marinas, ~~...'.........'.....J i\ç . ·'.'-",·v,. . B. NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT USES 7.01.03 STANDARDS AND REQUIREME Standards and requirements for a Planned Uni A. MINIMUM SIZE A Planned Unit Development common ownership or contr - No Change E. s 1 through 4 - No Change Unit Development may be dedicated to public use or retained under aid streets and associated improvements shall comply with all pertinent s and ordinances, however. variations to the standard minimum riaht-of- wa widt a be considered as art of the Planned Unit Develo ment if it is shown to the satisfactiô¡':¡' of the Board of County Commissioners. that the reauested variation is consistent with thecintent of the County's roadway construction standards and necessary for the desian of the'Planned Unit Development. Paragraphs 6 through 12- No Change ---------~~rlTMisf~ad~tioo--------- Gt:r ilt.:. 'flUðtlgh is for deletion Double Underline or Gt:rikG Otlt /Redline is change from 01/05/98 Bee meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 9 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 '-" ';./ I. OPEN SPACE STANDARDS 1. A minimum of thirty-five (35) percent of the gross area of land to be committed to a Planned Unit Development must be for use as common open space. which may include. parks, recreation areas, bicycle and pedestrian paths and facilities. marinas, swimming beaches, common open space, common landscapina and planting areas, or other.areas of public purposes or use other than street. road or drainaQe rights-of- a ground utilities.. excludina stormwater treatment facilities, and parking areas. Of the required 35 percent common open space imum native habitat on the property, is to be preserv.~ its natu preserved native habitat above the required Jpfnimum 15 original state, credit shall be given at a rate Qf!1150 perc common open space requirement. a. nd id ntified for use as a dedicated for park or common open space shall contiguous acre, and all such areas shall be physically part of the pment. Open spêce provided to meet any other environmental preservation or protection . ts of this code or other lawful reQulatorv authority shall not be considered as may d towards meeting this the overall open space requirement. Paragraphs J through K - No Change ---------~~dT~isf~~d~tioo--------- GtJ::iJcc 'PhJ::otlgh is for deletion Double Underline or OtJ::ikc Ol:lt /Redline is change from 01/05/98 Bee meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 10 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 '" ~ ******************************** 7.02.00 PLANNED NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 7.02.02 PERMITTED USES The following general guidelines shall be used in determining the perrnitted Nonresidential Zoning Development: in any Planned A. For properties located in any Residential or Agricultur~;liîlêlassified Any permitted, conditional or accessory use, includi for those uses, as identified in the Commercial, N Institutional (I) Zoning Districts, and in the Agric non-residential permitted or accessory use identified i 2.5), or Agricultural-5 (AG-5) zoning districts of this with the requirements of Section 7.10.23. ards, condition (CN); Com mere use classified areas only, any ej1 (AG-1), Agricultural-2.5 (AG- mi1l¡ication towers must com I The general standards, conditions and and accessory uses shall be used in the d the surrounding land uses in the revie for Planned Nonresidential Develop and activities. und in this cqqe, that pertain to conditional mpatibility of the proposed use( s) with ial Development. All applications identification of all planned uses B. For properties located in ercial.OlvlndustriaLê!assified land use area: any standards, conditions and requirements eighborhood (CN); Commercial, Office (CO); dustrial , Industrial Heavy (I H), Utility (U) and (I) Institutional idential permitted or accessory use identified in the Agriculture-1 or Agricultural-5 (AG-5) zoning districts of this Code. I with the re uirements of Section 7.10.23. onditi nd requirements, as found in this Code, that pertain to conditional use in the determination of the compatibility of the proposed use(s) with he review of the Planned Nonresidential Development. All applications evelopment shall include a complete identification of all planned uses DS AND REQUIREMENTS rements for a Planned Non-Residential Development shall be as follows: ---------~~dIMi;f~ad~tioo--------- Otrik~ 'i'hro~9h is for deletion Double Underline or 8t:dk{. 0111:: /Redline is change from 01/05/98 Bee meeting ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 11 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 '-" .-..¡ Paragraph A -- No Changes B. DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS Minimum Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Table?1 0 in Section? .04.01, Are8, .' .' 8PprOV81 provided, however, that the Board of County Commissioner Planned Non-Residential Development upon compliance wit ore stria requirements in order to ensure compatibility with surro ,g land environment and natural resources, to ensure public and to Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; and, condition approval of a estrictive dimensional it!gate impact on . nee with any structure on North or South Hutchinson Island t not received a building permit, site plan or other Co prior to January 10, 1995, the requirements of Sectio Overlay Zone shall apply. has D. TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULAWION Para fq··, X""$ 4. pment may be dedicated to public use or ts and associated improvements shall comply ordinances. however. variations to the standard ,~agraph 5 through 11-- No Changes Paragraph E through G - No Changes r development projects of less than ten (10) acres, a minimum of twenty (20) percent of the gross area of land to be committed to a Planned Non-Residential Development must be ---------~~clIMi;f~ad~tioo--------- Gt.ikc Th.ot1gh is for deletion Double Underline or 3trikc O~t /Redline is change from 01/05/98 BCC meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 12 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 - 41 42 43 44 45 46 - ..... for use as common open space, which may include parks, recreation areas, bicvcle and pedestrian paths and facilities, marinas, swimming beaches, common open space. common landscapinq or planting areas, or other areas of public purposes other than street or road rights-of-way, utility easements. excludinq exclusive stormwater treatment facilities, and parking areas. For development projects of ten (10) acres or more, a minimum of thirty-five (35) percent of the gross area of land to be committed to a Planned Non-Residential Development must be for use as common open space. which may include parks,.recr . n areas, bicvcle and pedestrian paths and facilities, marinas, sY.'immin9 beach~ mmon open spac~., common landscapinq or planting areas. or otherareas of public ther than st~~e~ or road rights-of-way, utility easements excludin exclusive storm tment facilitiês, and parking areas. At the request of the developer, and subjeqt.tøthø approval of the County Còmmissioners, use of recreational facilities mcr~iiþêi(:)U~red to the general public. Of the required common open space, a minimum ofij~~~l1i!(15 ercent of any remaining native habitat on the property is to be prø§~wed in its na'lIr~1 ion. For each acre of preserved native habitat above the rfaquiredJoinimum 15pørc~ that is preserved in its original state, credit shall be given atarateoft50,percent per acre towards the remaining common open space requirement. Areas that are floodvvays, lakes, y.¡etl8r¡ds, ar.ds\()ij(1'lv;ater retentior. areas m8Y be applied to s8tisfy the total opensp8cð requirement. hased conve ance of the land to be used for common 0 en s ace to a ublic or acceptable private aqencv that will. upon acceptance, aqree to maintain the common open space and any buildinqs, structures or improvements that have been placed on it. The schedule for the phased conveyance of any such lands to be used for common open space shall be a specific condition of approval for the Planned ---------~dedT~isf~ad~d;~-------- 8Lrik(. 'flnotlgh is for deletion Double Underline or 8trik(. Otlt /Redline is change from 01/05/98 BCC meeting Page 13 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 ~ "" ~ 1 County Public Works Department. 2 3 E. NONCONFORMING USES 4 5 When repairs and alterations are to be made in a building occupied by a nonconforming use, all off- 6 street parking requirements contained in this Code shall be complied with if the cqstof repairs and 7 alterations exceed fifty (50) percent of the assessed value of the building and s .. tlJres. 8 9 10 7.06.02 OFF-STREET PARKING 11 12 A. REQUIRED OFF-STREET PARKING 13 14 The following off-street parking shall be provided for 15 16 TABLE 7-20 17 (Partial only - See Land Development Cod 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 USE Hotel/Motel Units B. 1. ( insert Figure 7-23) of the required eighteen (18) feet may be in grass instead of pavement if that two ot included in any other required landscape or separation area. parking may be used consistent with the method of measurement identified in Figure All off-street parking shall be designed with access aisles in accordance with the Table 7-21 ---------ü~edIMisf~ãd~tioo--------- 3t"ik~ 'fh1:0t1gh is for deletion Double Underline or 3Lrik(. Otlt /Redline is change from 01/05/98 BCC meeting Page 20 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 1 2 3 ~ 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 '--' ......,¡ below: TABLE 7-21 MINIUM PARKING ACCESSAISLEDIMENSIONS Angle of parking (degrees) 90 75 60 45 30 o c. Off-street parking facilities, inclu.· two-famil and three-famil dw shall be paved and shall b fashion to indicate parkin all multi-family. includinQ requiring site plan approval, s, precast curbs, or in a similar d. ared entrance or exit drives located in ed within ten (10) feet of adjoining property ay frontage, and said unpaved area shall be .00. Parkin or of an motor vehicle recreational vehicle boat trailer or other vehicle in any reauirða landscape area is prohibited. Paragraph 2 through 5 - No Change - - - - - - - - - underiTn~ is""fõî- -addition- - - - - - - -- ßtL':'k£. 'l'hJ:~tlgJ.oJ. is for deletion Double Underline or ::JtJ:ik£. Otlt /Redline is change from 01/05/98 BCC meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 21 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15- 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 ~ """ ******************************** 7.09.00 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING 7.09.02 APPLICABILITY 7.09.03 GENERAL PROVISIONS A. REQUIREMENT FOR LANDSCAPING PLAN A general landscaping plan shall be require~:H'lNithaUbg.nding permit a .ii ations associated with any new structural construction or 8ny additiol1to any existings cture,èxcept for those structures that are part of a bona-fide agricultural lJ~è or operati6ne ma otherwise be s ecificall addressed bv this Code. and that as'part of thatoperati6 volve the retail sale of materials produced on site. In addition to demonstrating must show the location of landsQape plans shall i, righ way and s with the otherprovisions of this Code, all landscaping plans roposed@Utility lines and rights-of-way. The general of.tt1éiproposed landscaping to these utility lines and ncewith the other provisions of this Code. I identity the type and quantity of all plant and tree species to be ns of this Code. tè of occupancy or other final occupancy/use authorization, the t Dire pr shall inspect and verify that the landscape plantings on the the approved landscaping plans. Paragraph B & C - No Changes e responsible for the maintenance of all landscaping, which shall be maintained in n so as to present a healthy, neat, and orderly appearance free from refuse and tenance shall include the replacement of all unhealthv and dead material within ninety 30 days in conformance with the approved site plan/ or landscape plan. Violatiòns of this ---------u~eclI~isf~ad~tion-------- Gt:rik¿ 'fh:rðt1gh is for deletion Double Underline or :Jtrik¿ Otlt /Redline is change from 01/05/98 BCC meeting Ordinance #99-001C Draft #3 Page 22 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ~ ......., '-' section. or failure to maintain all required landscapinq shall be qrounds for referral to the Code Enforcement Board for appropriate enforcement actions. The 30 day rule for compliance may be extended. when necessary. bv the County Administrator or his desiqnee to permit recovery from acts of nature such as a hurricane or a freeze. E. PLANT MATERIALS 1. Quality Plant materials used in conformance with the p standards of Florida No.1 or better as given in ' 1973, and "Grades and Standards for Nur Agriculture and Consumer Services Development Director, or standards equal t all conform to the ursery Plantsrì: artmeot'~of All plant materials shall be insect- and d' reasonably free of weeds and noxious pests are known to be intolerant of paving enviro injurious to the public. or that produce a q maintenance difficulties shall not be sp . 2. Trees a. groups of three (3) to achieve this min imum fifteen All paees shall have a minimum clear trunk of ten (10) feet hree palm trees are equal to one shade tree having a mature feet. ecies e a minimum often (10) twelve (12)feet in height and have a o an one-half (2 1/2) inches at four and one-half (4 1/2) feet above the installed. Heiqht shall be determined bv the averaqe end of all t the tallest branch or two. trees. except palms. shall have a minimum of five (5) feet of clear trunk a minimum five (5) foot canopy spread at time of planting. Trees of species whose roots are known to cause damage to public roadways or other public works shall not be planted closer than twelve (12) feet to such public roads or works. unless the tree root system is completely contained with a barrier for which the minimum dimensions shall be five (5) feet square and five (5) feet deep, ---------~~dTMisf~ad~Üoo--------- OL:k:ikc. Throlj.gh is for deletion Double Underline or 3trikc. Olj.t /Redline is change from 01/05/98 Bee meeting Ordinance #99-001C Draft #3 Page 23 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 3J 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ~ ......; and for which the construction requirements shall be four (4) inch thick concrete reinforced with number six (6) road mesh (6x6x6) or equivalent. f. None of the following trees shall be used to meet the requirements of this section: Melaleuca leucadendra (Punk Tree) Casuarina spp. (Australian Pine) Dalbergiasissoo (Rosewood) Albizzia lebbeck (Woman's Tounge) Bishofia javanica (Bishofia) Enterolobium cycocarpum (Ear tree) Ficus spp. (Non-Native Ficus) Sapium sebifrum (Chinese Tallow Tree) Melia azedarach (Chinaberry) and all non-native fruit trees such as 9..:. 911· planted to meet the requirements vided. The minimum number of species . When a mix of species is required, no o relative to all other individual species. REQUIRED SPECIES MIX Minimum Number Of Species 31-40 2 3 4 5 41+ At leest 50% One hundred ( 100%) percent of the planted trees shall consist of native species such as Live Oaks (Quercus virginiana), Laurel Oaks (Quercus laurifola), slash pine (Pinus elliotti), or other species listed in Section 7.09.06(C)(2)(d), Native and Drought-Tolerant Vegetation. The requirements for canopy or shade trees shall ---------~~rlT~i;f~ad~tioo--------- Dt:tik" ThLOl:1gh is for deletion Double Underline or Otrik¿ O~t /Redline is change from 01/05/98 Bee meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 24 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 \..t "-'" be exempted by the Community Development Director when the proposed location of the canopy or shade trees will be in conflict with overhead power lines as described in Section 7 .09.04(E)(2)ti} ill of this Code. The Community Development Director shall require mitigation at a minimum ratio of one to one to compensate for the loss of any canopy or shade tree. il No tree shall be planted where it could, at mature height, cOl1tl¡~twith overhead power lines. Larger trees (trees with a mature heigh feØt'or more) shall be planted no closer than a horizontal dista of 30 f :the nearest overhead power line. Medium trees (trees with a heig - 30 feet) shall b~ off-set at least 20 feet horizontally fr neare er line. sdf trees (trees with a mature height of I han 20 ~ ired to et a minimum off-set, except that no tre ardles five (5) feet of any existing or propose ctrical transformer or other utility transmiss Palm trees with a maximum mature power lines shall not be planted bel minimum of two and one half (2 1/2 outside of any utility right-of- consultation with Florida P typically found in the S reasonably be expectedito inte ugh to interfere with overhead lines and shall be located a e mature frond length, elopment Director, in .. all maintain a list trees ature growth heights can ipower lines. 3. Shrubs and 4. imum..:iiiiii twenty four (24) inches in height above grade g. Hedgès;\vhere required, shall be planted and maintained so as irt 30 inch or higher continuous, unbroken, solid visual screen after the time of planting. um of twelve (12) inches in height immediately after planting and may on with fences, screens, or walls to meet physical barrier requirements. 5. Ground CoVers Groundcovers, other than grass, shall be planted in such a manner as to present a finished appei:itance and reasonably complete coverage within nine (9) four (4) months after planting. awn Grass ---------~dedT~isf~ad~tioo--------- Gt~ik¿ "Fr.:rOl:1gh is for deletion Double underline or 3t:rik¿ Ol:1t /Redline is change from 01/05/98 Bee meeting ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 25 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 '-' .....,¡ Grass areas shall be planted in species normally grown as permanent lawns in St. Lucie County. Grass areas may be sodded, plugged, sprigged, or seeded, except that solid sod shall be used in swales or other areas subject to erosion. When other than solid sod is used, protective measures shall be taken until complete coverage is achieved. 7. Native Vegetation If the proposed landscape area preservesithe exis . plantings will be required if adequate screening isp" ed. The Commu ment Director shall determine if the preserved native vedetâtìon meets the intent of this Code. 8. Synthetic Lawns ments in this Code. Synthetic or artificial turf shall not be usedinl'lieu of the p 9. Synthetic Plants Synthetic or artificial material.~if'l'the for~fof trees,shrugs,;ground covers, or vines shall not be used in lieu of the plantr~quirements in this Code; 7.09.04 on-residential, mobile home parks/subdivisions, s. includina all reauested chanQes in use. except rovided that no A. ACENT TO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET OR ROAD buildinQ, off-street parking area or other vehicular use area .",iII not be abutting a street or road shall be designed and landscaped as follows: and at least fifteen (15) feet in depth shall be located between the abutting street right-of-way and-the any off-street parking area which and shall be landscaped to e one (1) tree for each thirty (30) linear feet of abutting right-of-way or major fraction ereof. ---------~declT~isf~ad~doo--------- Gt:rik¿ ThJ:ðt1gh is for deletion Double Underline or 3trik¿ Otlt: /Redline is change from 01/05/98 BCC meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 26 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 - \..t ......, In addition, a hedge, wall or other durable landscaping barrier shall be placed along the interior perimeter of-the this required landscaped strip. If such B bBrrier is of non Ii'ýing mBteriBI. for eBoh ten (10) feet or m8jorfl'5otion thereof, one (1) shrub or'ý"ine shBII be plBnted Bbutting such bBrrier. 2. All property lying between the right-of-way and off-street parking or other vehicular use area other outside th8n the required landscaped strip shall be landscaped withJ,âf least grass or other ground cover. 3. Necessary accessways from the public right-of permitted to service the principal us~ parking, 4. Noncontinuous landscaped earthen berms a continuous hedge provided that the inten maintained. Maximum slope ratios for all ea· be used.ln'conjunctiol'Í v' ual barrier crea shall be no grea Fences. walls or other similar barriers. whether,:tl1e!,\:~i~~ic~nstructed of opaque materials or not. may be located in any required yard. consistenti\~!þ:~!þeHprovision for Section 8.00.00 of this Code. All required perimeter landscapinq shall be\I()~t~~ii(')Ð.the outside (street side) of the wall or fence. Any brick. masonl1(:ièi~tock~de or siniiléirIV"'~~structed wall adjacent to a public or private street riQht-of-wa~Æ~~~lliii~e\~~~!~ned and c~n~trtJcted so that the wall face facinq the street or road is articy!~!êdii;in'su~~:i'i'IiI'1~~~~r as nottø result a continious flat wall surface facinç¡ the street or ro~dÌÎiàht-of-YlaY;\è)~i~~~~:j!'~i~~i'eeneraIlY depicts the placement of a fence or wall alonQ a p~Ðìíc or pri~~te Sfre;!i'j~i~!~~~f;,waY. Pedestrian and vehicular access throuQh any wall o~i!ence are ~~IÍì11itted. h()wêtêÌ" the wall or fence shall be places so that adequate siQht di~!~.~~~ at any .~~hicular or .~eâestrian access is maintained. It shall be the responsibility of tb~lJ¡øbertv ()~ner to maii~!áln alllandscapina alonQ the outside edQe of an fence or wall4oo'msistent witffl1l1he re uirements of this Code. B. rea or other vehicular use area will not be entirely screened by . ding structure from an abutting property, that portion of such area not vided with a landscaped buffer of not less than ten (10) feet in width. uffer shall be designed and planted with a hedge or other durable not less than six (6) feet in height within !'two (2) yeBrs one (1) year after rm a continuous screen between the off-street parking area or other vehicular d such abutting property. Such landscaped barrier shall be located between the t line and the off-street parking area and other vehicular use areas. A six (G) foot In addition, one (1) tree shall be provided for each thirty (30) linear feet or major fraction ---------~~dT~isf~ad~tioo--------- atrikc 'l'hrot1g1. is for deletion Double Underline or Otrik~ Out /Redline is change from 01/05/98 BCC meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 27 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 .. \...; ......I thereof of such landscape barrier. 3. Noncontinuous landscaped earthen berms may be used in conjunction with the planting of a continuous hedge provided that the intent of the visual barrier created by the hedge is maintained. Maximum slope ratios for all earthen berms shall be no greater than 3:1. Fences. walls or other similar barriers. whether they are constru~ted of ~~~(ue materials or not. may be located within any reauired yard. consistent wi~~~,t~~P~ø"isions of Section 8.00.00 of this Code. All reauired perimeter lands~~ina shall~~e,¡!~~~~ed alona the outside of the wall or fence. Pedestrian access thro~~~lül~hV wall?0t!~,f~m~e,'!;~~V be permitte~, however the wall or fence shall be placed so th~1~aCfeauate sie~t!â'i!!~~~~¡~,~ the pedestril3n' access is maintained. It shall be the respon~Ðilitv of th~,~í:opért¥m~~~'~~~~~"main~~i,~!¡~1I landscapina alona the outside edae of any felllse or wall consistent with:¡tt!iè[¡~è~l!Iirem.ëÌ1its of this Code. C. PARKING AREA INTERIOR LANDSCAPING 1 . Generally Surface parking and other vehicular u interior landscaping for each eighte parking and vehicular use area. of one hundred eighty (180) s feet and shall include at lea with shrubs, ground cover feet in height. (1) square foot of thereof of off-street scaped, a shall contain a minimum iriimum width of at least ten (10) g area adequately landscaped g material not to exceed three (3) on (IX) and Utilities (U) will be exempt from ements and onlv need to provide interior aisle areas. All other vehicular use areas are IIrè"úirements. 'encroach upon any reauired landscaped area. Two (2) feet parking space abutting on a landscaped area may be planted over provided that a suitable motor vehicle stop is provided. parking stalls shall be required to end in a landscaped island which shall less than ten (10) feet in width, or less than fifteen (15) feet in length. At least hall be provided for each terminal island. r Landscape Areas No more than fifteen (15) parking spaces shall be permitted in a continuous row without being ---------~~dT~isf~ad~tioo--------- Gtrikc "I'lu:o~gh is for deletion Double Underline or Otrikc Ol1t /Redline is change from 01/05/98 Bee meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 28 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 \wi ...., interrupted by a minimum landscape area of one hundred eighty (180) square feet for a single row of parking or four hundred square feet for a double row of parking. Each interior landscaped area shall have a minimum width of ten (10) feet. 5. Curbing All terminal landscaped islands and interior landscaped areas continuous raised, nonmountable curb in accordance with the !:¡ of St. Lucie County as identified in Chapter 13 of Code. ounded with a s for public works 6. Off-Street Parking Lot Median Landscaping a. A linear landscape median betwee satisfy, in part, the requirements 0 Terminal islands are required as de b. Th1s ~ landscaped parking lot medi width and provide for the planting median lenath or fraction thereof. protected with a continuous, rai!:¡ curb stops in accordance wiJQ'¡th as identified in Chapter1>ª¡,ôfthi D. VISIBILITY FOR LANDSCAPING AD ACCESS TS-OF-WA Y AND POINTS OF r when the subject property abuts the I landscaping within the triangular areas ility at a level between three (3) feet and six bs and foliage trimmed in such a manner that rea shall be allowed provided they are so located 1. h sides of an accessway formed by the intersection of each side nd t public right-of-way line with two (2) sides of each triangle being ngth from the point of intersection and the third side being a line of the two (2) other sides. The area o~tþroperty located at the corner formed by the intersection of two (2)or more public rights-of~way with two (2) sides of the triangular area being thirty (30) feet in length along the abuttiQgiiÞ'ublic right-of-way lines, measured from their point of intersection, and the third side b Erline connecting the ends of the other two (2) lines. ED BUFFER AREAS BETWEEN NON-RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES ---------~~dTMisf~ad~ti~--------- OtJ(ikl:. TllJ(ot19h is for deletion Double Underline or OtJ(ikl:. Otlt IRedline is change from 01/05/98 BCC meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 29 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 '--" .....I Buffer areas between non-residential and residential uses shall be landscaped with a fence. wall~ landscaped berm. or continuous hedge or other durable landscaped barrier of at least six (6) feet in height that forms a continuous screen between the uses. In addition. one (1) tree shall be provided for each thirty (30) linear feet or maior fraction thereof of buffer area. If such barrier is of non Ii v ing material, one (1) shrub or vine shall be I'ro'ýided for e'ý~~ five (S) linear feet of the barrier or major fraction thereof on the side of the barrier tOv..~.rd the(~~siaential use. In addition, one (1) tree shall be I'ro'vided for each thirty (3D) linear feeto!'c>.major:frection thereof of buffer area. F. G. EXISTING OFF-STREET existed as of the effective date of this Code and in area or capacity, the entire parking lot, both old and H. NING REQUIREMENTS FOR BACK-SIPHONAGE AND BACKFLOW e responsibility of the developer to landscape and screen backflow preventers. preventers shall be placed on private property. "A continuous landscaped buffer shall be placed around the backflow prevention device, to provide a visual screen from adjacent properties. All shrubs or hedges shall be a minimum ---------~~dT~isfwad~ti~--------- Ot:dk~ 'FIUOl1gh is for deletion Double Underline or Gtr::']C<. Out /Redline is change from 01/05/98 BCC meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 30 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ~ .....1 of eighteen (18) inches above grade immediately after planting, and shall be planted and maintained so as to form a four (4) foot or higher continuous, unbroken, solid visual screen within one (1) year after the time of planting. I. LANDSCAPING REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES OF THREE OR FEWER UNITS 1. Any new residential structure containing one (1), two (2), or three(ß) must preserve or plant one (1) tree for every 2,500 square feet of subjes~~!pt'i:2~parcel of land, up to a maximum planting of 17 trees per lot or parcel. ·Iot or Pª~f~Ii:great,er than one acre area, the provisions of Section 6.00.00, Veg Protectionii:iàl1d ation, complied with. 2. All trees preserved or planted in order to me standards of Section 7.09.03(C)(2) of this C 3. At le8st 50% One hundred (100%) percent of such as Live Oaks (Quercus virginiana), LaYj elliotti), or other species listed in Section 7~09.06(C Vegetation. ,s shall consist of native species laurifola), slash pine (Pinus tive and Drought-Tolerant J. 1:. more that five hundred (500) feet from any adjacent property that is not under the ownership or control ofthe developino party, Road rioht-of-way and drainaae canal rioht-of-way are not excluded from this property determination; or. ---------~~clT~isf~~d~tioo--------- StJ: iJc¿ 'I'luottgh is for deletion Double Underline or Otrik~ Ottt /Redline is change from 01/05/98 Bee meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 31 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 '-' ....", 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 1"9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 QJ Is adeauately screened by an existinq native veqetation buffer meetinq the intent of this paraqraph. This existinQ native veqetative buffer must be located on the property that the buildinq or aroup of buildinqs is located on. If relief is qranted under this paraqraph. and if the native veqetation buffer is ever removed fro any reason. the property owner shall be responsible to provide new plantinqs consistent with the requirements of this code. K. OFF-STREET SITE LIGHTING REQUIREMENTS & GENERAL DESIGN~STANØARDS General Requirements Where artificial outdoor Ii htin is rovided it shall be~dêsi ned an tno sour f the liqhtinq will be a visible nuisance to adioininq pro~~ttv used.~~~fõned for¡ì3¡~~!!!!~~!~~õse. In addition. the liqhtinq shall be so desiqned and arran~è~¡~()~~~~1¡Shield public strè~~.~~~~I~ililhwaYs and all adiacent properties from direct qlare or hazardà~~~~t~îì!~tEmce of any kind. FdrífÁ\)rni.ìresidential ro erties that abut ro e used or zoned for a resideritiåf~l!r·:bse to the rear or side the followin shall apply: L The,rl"ìaximum allowable mountinq heiqht of all outdoor liqht fixtures within 25 feet from the '13'" ro e line is 6 feet or not to extend above the hei ht of the buffer wall. All outdoor liqhtinq installations shall use concealed source fixtures. These shall be cut-off ---------~~rlTMisf~ad~tioo--------- Gtrik,- 'Fhr01:19h is for deletion Double Underline or Otrik,- O~t /Redline is change from 01/05/98 Bee meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 32 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 - ~ ~ .....J type fixtures in which the lenses do not proiect below the opaque section of the fixture. All IiQhtinQ fixtures shall be mounted with a zero deqree tilt. Ground mounted flood and spotliQht fixtures that are used to illuminate the buildinq facade are exempt from this requirement. Fixture styles shall be consistent throuqhout the site. . 4. Ground mounted flood and spotliQhts. if used. shall be placed on standard~"pointinQ toward the buildinq or wall and positioned so as to prevent liQht from QI~~!nQ ont~;residential areas. rather than the build in s or walls and directed outward which creates dal'i~shadows ad'acent to the buildinQs. 5. 6. All outdoor Ii htin fixtures in lace rior to . f first month followin effective date of this ordinance) shall be permitted~!~¡íco,.¡tì:rn!:~ì~~~!i?n. However. any outdoor IiQhtinQ fixture that replaces an existinq fixture. or an'~~~¡S~i!q~~~~~re that is moved. must meet the standards of this Code. Existi~~:;f~~:~res thata"!:~t;i~~~toward streets. and are determined to be a traffic hazard. or~~i~!!~'~i~~~~~~ that dire¡t\¡I!~~titoward adioininQPropertv used or zoned for a residential ur;;øse's~ãlll1ê!:eitber shieldeâ/or redirected within 90 da s of notification. d:-!: 7. 8. irector determines based upon a showing by the applicant for' eral application of these regulations will not meet the general Code result of use, traffic patterns, drainage or other issues of it an a ernate landscape scheme in accordance with the provisions of this Ian submitted as an alternative shall be designed in such a manner that and the amount of material provided equal at least one and one half (1 was originally required. ******************************** P FLlCTING PROVISIONS. ---------~~rlI~i;f~ad~tioo--------- Gt.J:ikc:. 'fhJ:Ol1::¡h is for deletion Double Underline or Gt.J:ikc:. Otlt. /Redline is change from 01/05/98 BCC meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 33 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 . '-' ..." Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declare inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the re. . ing If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be h e in property, or circumstance, such holding shall not an Its appli property, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable throughout St. PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTM6 The Clerk be and is hereby directed fo the Bureau of Administrative Cod Tallahassee, Florida 32304. opy of this ordinance to t of State, The Capitol, PART F. EFFECTIVE DA Department of State, except that the 2)(c); 7.09.03(E)(2)(i); and 7.09.03(E)(3) xxx ice Chairman John Bruhn xxx Commissioner Cliff Barnes xxx ---------~~rlI~isf~ad~tioo--------- [¡trike 'Fluol:lgh is for deletion Double Underline or Otrike Olit /Redline is change from 01/05/98 BCC meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 34 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 .. '-" ...",.¡ Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX PART H. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Compiled Laws, and the word "ordinance" may be cha to " appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance accomplish such intention; provided, however, that PASSED AND DULY ENACTED this xxth day of ATTEST: MISSIONERS DA DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ---------~~dIMisf~ad~tioo--------- [¡trike 'fh:cõt1gh is for deletion Double Underline or 3t~ike Otlt /Redline is change from 01/05/98 BCC meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 35 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 .. - "-' 1 2 DJM 3 99-001c(LDCamends - disc #8) ....., ---------~~rlT~isf~ad~tion-------- Or;rikc 'l'h:t:ðt1gn is for deletion Double Underline or Or;~ikc Ot1t /Redline is change from 01/05/98 Bee meeting Ordinance #99-001c Draft #3 Page 36 PRINT DATE: 01/10/98 · .. '-' ...." AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, JANUARY 19,1999 7:00 P.M Consider Draft Ordinance 99-001 (General Amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code). If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of theproceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during.a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on January 9,1999. FILE NO. ORD-99-001 · ,¡ ~ ~ . NOTICE OF ESTABLI~ENT OR CHANGE OF REGlJr'ATION , AFFECTING THE USE OF LAND The 5L lucie County Board of County Commissionen propose to adopt the following Ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 99-001 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE 5T. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 2.00.00, DEFINITIONS, TO PROVIDE FOR AMENDMENT TO THE DEFINITIONS OF HDTEUMOTEL AND OPEN SPACE; AND BY CREATING NEW DEFINITIONS FOR TEMPORARY BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURE AND TRANSIENT LODGING FACILITIES; BY AMENDING SECTION 3.01.03(E), AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT TO PROVIDE FOR A CLARIFICATION ON MOBILE HOMES AS AN ACCESSORY USE; BY AMENDING SECTION 4.01.05 HUTCHINSON ISLAND BUILDING HEIGHT OVERLAY ZONE, EXCEPTIONS, TO PROVIDE FOR ADDED CLARIFICATIONS PERTAINING TO VESTED SITE PLANS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS; BY AMENDING SECTION 6.06.01(B)(II), MINING, RESTRICTIONS, REGULATIONS AND CONDITIONS ON A MINING PERMIT TO CLARIFY THOSE AREAS WHERE MINING ACTIVITIES ARE PROHIBITED; BY AMENDING SECTION 6.06.02, MINING EXTRACTION INCIDENTAL TO DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES, TO PROVIDE FOR A CLARIFICATION ON CONSTRUCTION OF STDRMWATER WORKS ASSOCIATED WITH ROADWAY CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS; BY AMENDING SECTION 7.01.02, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PERMITTED USES TO PROVIDE FOR CLARIFICATION OF USES ALLOWED; BY AMENDING SECTION 7.01.03, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS, BY REDUCING THE MINIMUM PARCEL SIZE REQUIRED FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, BY CLARIFYING THE ABILITY TO VARY FROM MINIMUM RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH STANDARDS WITHIN A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND BY CLARIFYING STANDARDS GOVERNING OPEN SPACE WITHIN A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT; BY AMENDING SECTION 7:02.02, PLANNED NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, PERMITTED USES, TO PROVIDE FOR CLARIFICATION OF USES ALLOWED INCLUDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS; BY AMENDING SECTION 7.02.03, PLANNED NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS, BY CLARIFYING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DETERMINATION OF MINIMUM SITE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS, BY CLARIFYING THE ABILITY TO VARY.FROM MINIMUM RIGHT-oF- WAY WITH STANDARDS WITHIN· A.P.LANNED NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND· BY CLARIFYING STANDARDS GOVERNING OPEN SPACE WITHIN A PLANNED NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPM'ENT; BY AMENDING SECTION 7.03.02, PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, PERMITTED USES· AND LOCATIONS TO PROVIDE FOR CLARIFICATION OF USES ALLOWED; BY AMENDING SECTION 7.03.03, PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT, STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS BY CLARIFYING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DETERMINATION OF MINIMUM SITE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS, BY CLARIFYING THE ABILITY TO VARY FROM MINIMUM RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH STANDARDS WITHIN A PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT AND BY CLARIFYING STANDARDS GOVERNING OPEN SPACE WITHIN A PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT; BY AMENDING SECTION 7.05.02(A), TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS, STREETS, BY PROVIDING CLARIFYING LANGUAGE WITH REGARD TO THE PLANS OF THE ST. LUCIE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION AND ROADWAY SIGNAGE STANDARDS; BY AMENDING SECTION 7.05.08, STREET NAMING AND NUMBERING, BY PROVIDING FDR BICYCLE PATHS AND PROVIDING CLARIFICATION FOR THE RESPONSIBILITY OF STREET NAMING; BY AMENDING SECTION· 7.06.00, OFF- STREET PARKING AND LOADING, BY PROVIDING GENERAL AMENDMENTS TO THIS SECTION REQUIRING THE RECONSTRUCTION OF PARKING LOTS WITH ANY CHANGE IN USE AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THIS ORDINANCE; BY AMENDING SECTION 7.06.02, OFF STREET PARKING, BY AMENDING THE PARKING STANDARD FOR HOTEUMOTEL USES TO CORRECT AN INCORRECT NUMBER, BY AMENDING THE GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR WHEN OFF-STREET PARKING IS REQUIRED AND WHERE Off- STREET PARKING IS PROHIBITED; 8Y AMENDING SECTION 7.09.00 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING, TO PROVIDE FOR A SERIES OF GENERAL AMENDMENTS REQUIRING THE REPLACEMENT OR UPDATING OF ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPING WITH A CHANGE IN USE OR NEW ZONING COMPLIANCE, BY ENHANCING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR MAINTENANCE OF PLANTED LANDSCAPING AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BY AMENDING THE GENERAL STANDARDS FOR PLANT MATERIALS, BY AMENDING SECTION 7.09.04 CLARIFYING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO A PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET RIGHT-of-WAY, ABUTTING PROPERTIES PARKING AND INTERIOR LANDSCAPE AREAS, BUFFER REQUIREMENTS BETWEEN NON-RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES, OFF- STREET 'PARKING AND LOADING AREAS AND BY CREATING NEW REGULATIONS GOVERNING ON-SITE LIGHTING STANDARDS AND LANDSCAPE AND SCREENING STANDARDS APPLICABLE TO CERTAIN AGRICULTURAL USE AND ACTIVITIES; BY PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISION, BY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY, PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, PROVIDING FOR AN EFÆCTlVE DATE, PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION. A PUBLIC HEARING on Ordinance 99.001 will be held before the SI. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, January 19, 1999, at 7:00 PM or as soon Ihereafter as possible, in 1he County Commission Chambers, 3rd lIoor of the County Administration Annex, 2300 Virginia Ave, FI. Pierce, FL. Mallers affecting your personal and property rights may be heard and acted upon. All interested persons are mvited to attend and be heard. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be heard. The purpose of this public hearing is to amend the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code to provide for a series of general amendments to the Code. This Is the first of two required public hearings. The second public hearing on these proposed amendments will be held on February 2, 1999. Notification of this second hearing wili be published prior to the meeting. Copies of the proposed ordinances, are available for review in the office of the Community Development Director, St. Lucie County Administration Building. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, Florida, 34982, during regular business hours. Amendments to the proposed ordinance may be made at the public hearing. II any person decides to appeal any decision made with respect to any maller considered at the meetings or hearings ot any board, commillees. commissions. agency, council or advisory group, that person will need record of the proceedings and that. tor such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record should include the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing wili be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. This notice dated and executed this 5th day of January 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA IS/ Paula A. Lewis, Chairman PUBLISH DATE: January 9, 1999 - -n t lltws - .w '-I ....., NOTICE OF ESTABLISHMENT OR CHANGE OF REGULATION AFFECTING THE USE OF LAND , The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners propose to adopt the following Ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 99-001 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 2.00.00. DEFINITIONS. TO PROVIDE FOR AMENDMENT TO THE DEFINITIONS OF HOTEUMOTEL AND OPEN SPACE; AND. BY CREATING NEW DEFINITIONS FOR TEMPORARY BUILDINGS OR STRUCTURE AND TRANSIENT LODGING FACIUTIES; BY AMENDING SeCTION 3.01.; a03 . AGRICULTURAL RESIDENTIAL ZONING DISTRICT TO PROVIDE FOR A CLARIFICATION ON MOBILE HOMES AS AN ACCESSORY USE; BY AMENDING SECTION 4.01.05 HUTCHINSON ISLAND BUILDING HEIGHT OVI!RLA,Y ZONE, EXCEPTIONS. TO PROVIDE FOR ADDED CLARIFICATIONS PERTAINING. TO VESTED SITE PLANS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS; BY AMENDING SECTION 1I.01l.01(B)(11), MINING, RESTRICTIONS. REGULATIONS AND CONDITIONS oN A MINtNG PERMIT TO CLARIFY THOSE AREAS WHERE MINING ACTIVITIES ARE PROHIBITED; BY AMENDING SECTION 11.06.02, MINING EXTRACTION INCIDENTAL TO DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES, TO PROVIDE FOR A CLARIFICATION ON . CONSTRUCTION OF STORMWATER WORKS ASSOCIATED WITH ROA.DWAY CONSTRUCTION PRO.JECTS; BY AMENDING SECTION 7.01.02, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, PERMITTED USES TO PROVIDE FOR CLARIFICATION OF USES ALLOWED; BY AMENDING SECTION 7.01.03, PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS, BY REDUCING THE MINIMUM PARCEL· SIZE REQUIRED FOR A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT. BY CLARIFYING THE ABILITY TO VARY FROM MINIMUM RIGHT-OF-WAY WITH STANDARDS WITHIN A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT AND BY' CLARIFYING STANDARDS GOVERNING OPEN SPACE WITHIN A PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT: BY AMENDING SECTION 7.02.02. PLANNED NON~ESIDENTIALDEVELOPMENT. PERMITTED USES, TO PROVIDE FOR CLARIFICATION OF USES ALLOWED INCLUDING TELECOMMUNICATIONS TOWERS: BY AMENDING SECTION 7.02.03. PLANNED NON-RESIDENTlAL DEVELOPMENT, STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS. BY CLARIFYING THE' REQUIREMENTS FOR DETERMINATION OF MINIMUM SITE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS, BY CLARIFYING THE ABIUTY TO VARY. FROM MINIMUM RlGHT-oF- WAY WITH STANDARDS WlTI'/IN A PLANNED NONREBIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT AND BYCLARlFYlNGSTANDARDB GOVERNING OPEN SPACe: WITHIN A PLANNeD NONRESIDENTIAL DeveLOPMENT: BY AMENDING SECTION 7.03.02, PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT. PERMITTED USES AND LOCATIONS TO PROVIDE FOR CLARIFICATION OF USES ALLOWED: BY AMENDING SECTION 7.03.03, PLANNED MIXED USE DEVI!LOPMENT, STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS BY· CLARIFYING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR DETERMINATION OF MINIMUM SITE DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENTS. BY CLARIFYING THE.ABIUTY TO VARY FROM MINIMUM RIGHT-oF- WAY WITH STANDARDS WITHIN A PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT ANO BYCLARlPVING STANDARDS GOVERNING OPEN SPACE WITHIN A PLANNED MIXED USE DEVELOPMENT: BY AMENDING SECTION 7.05.02(A),· TRANSPORTATION SYSTEMS. STREETS, BY PROVIDING CLARIFYING LANGUAGE WITH REGARD TO THE PLANS OF THE ST. LUCIE METROPOUTAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION AND ROADWAY BIGNAGE STANDARDS: BY AMENDING SECTION 7.05.011. STREET NAMING AND NUMBERING. BY PROVIDING FOR BIcYCLE PATHS AND PROVIDING CLARIFICATION FOR THE RESPONSIBILITY OF STREET NAMING: BY AMENDING SECTION 7..08.00, OPF-STREET PARKING AND LOADING, BY PROVIDING GENERAL AMENDMENTS TO THIS SECTION REQUIRING THE RECONSTRUCTION OF PARKING LOTS WITH ANY CHANGE IN USE AFTER THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF THis ORDINANCE: BY AMENDINO SECTION 7.011.02. OFF STREET PARKING. BY AMENDINO THE PARKING STANDARD FOR HOTEUMOTEL USES TO CORRECT AN INCORRECT NUMBER; BY AMENDING THE GENERAL PROVISIONS FOR WHEN OFF-8TREETPARKlNG IS REQUIRED AND WHERE OFF- STREET pARKING IS PROHIBITED: BY AMENDING SECTION 7.otI.00 LANDSCAPING AND SCREENING, TO PROVIDE FOR A SERIES OF GENERAL AMENDMENTB REQUIRING THE REPLACEMENT OR UPDATING OF ALL EXISTING LANDSCAPING WITH A CHANGE IN USE OR NEW ZONINGCOMPUANCE, BY ENHANCING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR MAINTENANCE OF PLANTED LANDSCAPING AND PROVIDING PENALTIES, BY AMENDING THE GENERAL STANDARDS FOR PLANT MATERIALS. BY AMENDING SECTION 7.otI.04 CLARIFYING THE REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPING ADJACENT TO ·A PUBLIC OR PRIVATEaTREETRIOHT~F-WAY.ABUTTINO PROPERTIeS PARKING :~':.'g::~';t:.g~~~'i:è':iID:~~S::~:~~; PARKING AND LOADING AREAS AND BY CREATING NEW REGULATIONS GOVERNING ON-8ITE UGHTING STÀNDARDS AND LANDSCAPE AND SCREENING STANDARDS APPUCABLE TO CERTAIN AGRICULTURAL USE AND ACTIVITIES: BY PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISION, ·BY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILTY, PROVIDING FOR FlUNG WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION. A PUBUC HEARING on Ordinance 99-001 will be held before the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, january 19, 1999, at 7:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible, in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor 'Of the County Administration Annex, 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL Matters affecting your personal and property rights may be heard and acted upon. All inter· ested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be heard. The purpose of this public hearing is to amend the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code to pro- vide for a series of general amendments to the Code. This is the first of two required public hearings. The second public hearing on these proposed amendments will be held on February 2, 1999. Notification of this second hearing will be published prior to the meeting. Copies of the proposed ordinances are available for review in the office of the Community Development Director, SI. Lucie County Administration Buildin\!, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fl Pierce, Florida, 34982, duro ing regular business hours. Amendments to the proposed ordinance may be made at the pUblic hear·, ing. " any person decides to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter considered a1 the meet' ' " ings or hearings of any board, committees, commissions, agency, council or advisory group, that per-, son will need record of the proceedings and that, for such purpose may need to ensure that a verba· tim record of the proceedings is made, which record should include the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based, Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testify· ing during a hearing will be sworn in, Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to -. cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. "This Notice dated and executed this 5th day of Janueay, 1999. . . ., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ' , ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA" ISI Paula A. lewis. Chairman. PUBLISH DATE: Januarý 9, 1999 " r-·, I ~ .' - lIe{· b (,VII..(.. ~ CONSENT AGENDA 0. J .-....1 . .- -- -.'- - ~- _.- - ... 01/15/99 Sf'!( LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD . ~ ;.,' - t ~ r. FZABVARR ,~ .. PAGE 1 vARRÅNT LIST #16- 09-JAN-99 TO 15-JAN-99 , FUND SUMMARY .~ FUND TITLE EXPENSES 'oJ ... 001 · PAYROLL General Fund 001001 Recreation Speciai Events 377,467.02 001116 See 112/MPO/FHYAlPlanning 98199 3,760.00 0.00 " 001120 1,516.72 0.00 001228 ~~ity Services Block Grnt 98/99 124.39 0.00 001235 te City Park DEP 0.00 TDC Planning Grant 98/99 9,939.00 0.00 001242 98/99 E. M.. p.A. 66.25 0.00 101 Transportation Trust Fund 1,768.50 0.00 101001 Transportation Trust Interlocals 74,385.68 0.00 101003 Transportation Trust/Local Option 388.08 0.00 101006 Transportation Trust/Impact Fees 3,050.00 0.00 102 Unincorporated Services Fund 525.00 0.00 102001 Drainage Maintenance MSTU 27,023.98 0.00 102103 Urban & Community Forestry 97/98 1,927.62 0.00 105 Library Special Grants Fund 378.01 0.00 107 Fine & Forfeiture Fund 858.37 0.00 121 Blakely Subdivision Fund 204,624.99 0.00 66.03 0.00 140 Port & Airport Fund 5,579.42 0.00 ~ 140274 FOOTI Terminal ExpanSion c~ 60,042.60 0.00 160 Plan Maintenance RAD Fund 2,513.68 0.00 170 Court Facilities Fund 172.88 0.00 182 Environmental Land Acquisition Fund 1,059.67 0.00 183 Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir 6,361.46 0.00 183001 Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat 1,001.80 0.00 183206 FDJJ-Teen Court 98/99 459.88 0.00 ~«r! 185201 FBFA-185-SHIP 96/97 101. 39 0.00 185202 FBFA- SHIP 97/98 2,301.50 0.00 185203 FBFA-SHIP 98/99 393.76 0.00 186 Recycling operating Fund 533.41 0.00 ..q 186201 DEP-Recycling & Education 97/98 73.18- 0.00 186202 DEP-Recycling & Educa don 98/99 525.97 0.00 242 Port I&S Fund 206,001.25 0.00 315 County Building Fund 1,500.00 0.00 316 County Capital 1,989.08 0.00 352 SHI vastewater Treatment Proj Fund 608.75 0.00 382 Environmental Land Capital Fund 5,000.00 0.00 401 Sanitary Landfill Fund 13,660.86 0.00 401216 DEP-Litter Control & Prevent 98/99 845.68 0.00 418 Golf Course Fund 17,521.31 0.00 421 H.E.V. Utilities Fund 17,697.55 0.00 North Hutchinson Island Utilities 79,526.61 0.00 441 72,500.72 0.00 451 S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund 8,315.63 0.00 461 Sports CompleX Fund 6,086.15 0.00 491 Building Code Fund 47,242.26 3,360.18 501 Automated Services Fund 272.40 6,291.04 505 Insurance & LoSS Fund 10,717.80 0.00 510 Service Garage Fund 2,103.74 0.00 611 Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund GRAND TOTAL: 1,280,433.67 9,651.22 ~:-~~ ~ .;;¡. - ., ~,~ " 1::1 or ~ ~ C~~ WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners budget for St. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have become available from donations from the Friends of the Library to be used exclusively to furnish the new downtown Fort Pierce library. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 19th day of January, 1999, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 1998-99, and the County's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 316-7110-366900-7952 Donations $225,000 APPROPRIATIONS 316-7110-551200-7952 316-7110-564000- 7952 Equipment < $750 Machinery & Equipment $200,000 $25,000 After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner John D. Bruhn Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Frances Hutchinson xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 19th DAY OF January, 1999. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY G:\budget\gary\res_amds\l'12 _ LibFurn. wpd - ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD "'" f f. PAGE 1 01/15/99 " , ~' FZABYARR ( YARRANT LIST #16- 09-JAN-99 TO 15-JAN-99 FUND sUMMARY ':.1 "~ FUND TITLE EXPENSES .. PAYROLL -~ 001 General Fund 377,467.02 0.00 001001 Recreation Speciai Events 3,760.00 0.00 001116 Sec 112/MPO/FBVA/Planning 98/99 1,516.72 0.00 001120 Community Services Block Gmt 98/99 124.39 0.00 001228 TJhi te Ci ty Park DEP 9,939.00 0.00 001235 TDC Planning Grant 98/99 66.25 0.00 001242 98/99 E. M.. p.A. 1,768.50 0.00 101 Transportation Trust 'Fund 74,385.68 0.00 101001 Transportation Trust Interlocals 388.08 0.00 101003 Transportation Trust/Local Option 3,050.00 0.00 101006 Transportation Trust/Impact Fees 525.00 0.00 102 Unincorporated Services Fund 27,023.98 0.00 102001 Drainage Maintenance MSTU 1,927.62 0.00 102103 Urban & Community Forestry 97/98 378.01 0.00 105 Library Special Grants Fund 858.37 0.00 107 Fine & Forfeiture Fund 204,624.99 0.00 121 Blakely Subdivision Fund 66.03 0.00 140 Port & Airport Fund 5,579.42 - ~' 0.00 140274 FOOT/ Terminal Expà11Sion 60,042.60 0.00 160 Plan Maintenance RAD Fund 2,513.68 0.00 170 Court Facilities Fund 172.88 0.00 182 Environmental Land Acquisition Fund 1,059.67 0.00 183 Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir 6,361.46 0.00 183001 Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat 1,001.80 0.00 183206 FDJJ-Teen Court 98(99 459.88 0.00 ~ 185201 FHFA-185-SHIP 96/97 101.39 0.00 185202 FHFA- SHIP 97/98 2,301.50 0.00 185203 FHFA-SHIP 98/99 393.76 0.00 186 Recycling Operating Fund 533.41 0.00 186201 DEP-Recycling & Education 97/98 73.18- 0.00 186202 DEP-Recycling & Education 98/99 525.97 0.00 242 Port I&S Fund 206,001.25 0.00 315 County Building Fund 1,500.00 0.00 316 County Capital 1,989.08 0.00 352 SHI Yastevater Treatment Proj Fund 608.75 0.00 382 Environmental Land Capital Fund 5,000.00 0.00 401 Sanitary Landfill Fund 13,660.86 0.00 401216 DEP-Litter Control & Prevent 98/99 845.68 0.00 418 Golf Course Fund 17,521.31 0.00 421 H.E.Y. Utilities Fund 17,697.55 0.00 441 North Hutchinson Island Utilities 79,526.61 0.00 451 S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund 72,500.72 0.00 461 Sports Complex, Fund 8,315.63 0.00 491 Building Code Fund 6,086.15 0.00 501 Automated Services Fund 47,242.26 3,360.18 505 Insurance & Loss Fund 272.40 6,291.04 510 Service Garage Fund 10,717.80 0.00 611 Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund 2,103.74 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 1,280,433.67 9,651.22 ~ - .. ~ 'I ~ 01/15/99 FZABYARR FUND: 001 ~__ _ _ __~,.__...__.",.~,_ ,',s"',-' ...., ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD VOID USTI 16- 09-JAN-99 TO 15-JAN-99 _ General Fund CHECK TOTAL: TOTAL 9.52 100.12 132.68 130.00 8.68 57.39 29.56 49.27 32.15 8.00 557.37 557.37 CHECK INVOICE VENDOR 00237474 99008512 Tropic Supply Inc 99008518 99008520 99008522 99008525 99008527 99008529 99008531 99008534 99008544 .. :~ .~ ~ ~-- ",,1 !:~ . ~ FUND TOTAL: PAGE 1 d 01/15/99 FZABVARR ~'.":;;;~':';;:';'~;"'-;""~ ~..-~-; .'" .-- ~ LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD '-II .~ " VOID LISTI 16- 09-JAN-99 TO 15-JAN-99 FUND: 107 - Fine & Forfeiture Fund ".J - CHEŒ 00237474 99008552 Tropic Supply Inc FUND TOTAL: " L ,:/' ...j ;~.~ ~~ INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 151. 75 151. 75 ;,- ;' PAGE 2 .,. ~ ~ C~~ WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the S1. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners budget for S1. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have become available from donations from the Friends of the Library to be used exclusively to furnish the new downtown Fort Pierce library. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 19th day of January, 1999, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 1998-99, and the County's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 316-7110-366900-7952 Donations $225,000 APPROPRIATIONS 316-7110-551200-7952 316-7110-564000- 7952 Equipment < $750 Machinery & Equipment $200,000 $25,000 After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner John D. Bruhn Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Frances Hutchinson xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 19th DAY OF January, 1999. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY G:\budget\garylres_amds\l'12 _ LibFurn. wpd ·-' ,~ . 'i; - ITEM NO. C~ '-' AGENDA REQUEST ......, DATE: January 19,1999 REGULAR [ PUBLIC HEARING [ ] ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONSENT [X ] SUBMITTED BY: OMB PRESENTED BY: Harvey M. Lincoln SUBJECT: Budget Resolution # 99-28 New Downtown Fort Pierce Library Furniture BACKGROUND: The Friends of the Library have pledged to donate $225,000 to furnish the new downtown Fort Pierce library. Their fund-raising efforts have been successful, however they have not yet reached their goal. The contractor expects to complete the building construction by the end of February -- three months early -- which has caused some concern over whether or not the building will be furnished in time for the opening. To allow the library and purchasing staff the necessary lead time to select and purchase the furniture we are asking the Board to approve Budget Resolution # 99-28 which recognizes the Friends of the Library pledge and establishes a budget specifically for the furniture. Because some previously funded projects will not begin this fiscal year there is adequate cash in the fund to cover the cost of the furniture until the $225,000 pledge is actually received. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available in 316-7110-551200-7952 and 316-711 0-564000-7952 PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Budget Resolution 99-28 recognizing the $225,000 donation from the Friends of the Library and establishing a budget for the new downtown Fort Pierce library furniture. Staff also recommends the Board approve the list of furniture and equipment the library staff has selected for the new library (attached) and direct them to immediately begin the purchasing process. COMMISSION ACTION: I\~PPROVED [J DENIED [ ] OTHER: Amend Resolution to add $13,000. for wood furniture. Coord i nation/Sign atu res County Attorney: XX Management & Budget: XX Purchasing: Originating Dept: (Library) X Public Works: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX RESOLUTION NO. 99-28 G: \budget\garylres _ amds\ 1 '12_ LibFum. wpd '-' ...., ~ ~}), M E M 0 RAN DUM 99-089 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Susan Kilmer, Library Manager ~ DATE: January 18, 1999 SUBJECT: Furniture for new Library **************************************************************** We have been working with Standard Business Systems to put together a furniture package for the new library. All of our prices are from State of Florida Contracts #420-590-98-1 and #420-660-96-1. The package came in at $246,286.30, which is $21,286.30 over the dollar amount we have tentatively budgeted for this project. I have been able to reduce this ~mount by $4,486.56 by eliminating some furniture and replacing it with existing furniture. To reach the final dollar amount of $225,000 we will have to change to a particle core end panel instead of a solid wood end panel. We are also getting prices from another vendor (through Standard Business Systems) to lower the price of the Administrative Offices. With these additional changes we should be able to stay within the $225,000 budget for furniture. The Friends of the St. Lucie County Library, Inc., will accept donations for specialty items in the line of equipment or upgraded furniture along with their existing fund raising drive. The Friends have donated $68,000 thus far and have raised close to $25,000 more in donations since the original donation made to the Board of County Commission. The Friends of the St. Lucie County Library, Inc., are committed to this project and appreciate the support and assistance they have received from Doug Anderson, County Administrator. attachment xdu xifliL 13 ~ J'rwV( ) 'Susan B. Kilmer ¡ I '-' ~ ~ efi"...k.J 66.......... ef¡..1em.t Post 0/6cII eo. 29-1100 Goce Alton. FL. 33429-1 1 DEI {600) n8..~4U To: 1vís. Joan Steel From: Ed Cunning.bam. To crystallize our proposal, attached are deliveredflllSt:al1ed pricing for the library project. We are utilizing State of Florida Contracts #420-590-98-1 and #420-660-96-1 and T have fdtemized per our conversation and made the corrections we discussed, Please can to conñrm receipt ofthis information. Thanks: Received TJ¡:-,e hn.13. 6:34PM Ed I e,' J V J ~¡J ¡(Hi1! It) 1< JVJ,¡¡J / (jf/J//T£O ~riM¿1fJ '/l'f/t1 f? - '-' ...., FIRST FLOOR 2 L663609 $118.50 S 237.00 8 L663618 192.00 1,536.00 95 L843618 250.00 23,750.00 10 L843624FB 288.00 2,880.00 17 L843612FB 169,00 2,873.00 S 5 L842412FB 169.00 845.00 3 End. Filler 50.00 150.00 H 2 Tntetmedìate Fi11er 75.00 150.00 15 F483622FB 241.50 3,622.00 E 5 LPF66DF 289.50 1,447.50 35 L723620 232.00 8)20.00 L TOTAL S4S~611.00 V I SECOND FLOOR N 63 L843620 $262.50 $16,537.50 8 1483620 201.00 1,608.00 G '14 L1>F90 253.00 3,542.00 4 LPF90DF 453.00 1,812.00 6 L663609 118.50 711.00 7 L663648 192.00 1,344.00 3 Intennediate Filler 75.00 225.00 1 Comer Filler 50.00 . 50.00 TOTAL $25,829.50 6:34PM TOTAL SHELVING $71,440.50 Received Time J á no ! 3, - -....,... """"'" FIRST FLOOR E N 34 EP DJF 84" x 20'1 $205.00 $6,970.00 4 EP D/F 84" x 2411 231.50 926.00 D 8 EP SIF 84" x 12" 167.50 1,340.00 6 EP D/F 48" x 2411 P 245.50 1,473.00 16 EP D/F 72" x 24" P 293.00 4.688.00 P TOTAL $IS.397.00 A N SECOND FLOOR E 6 EP 48" x 24" 191.00 1,146.00 L 44 EP 84" X24" 231. 5 0 lOJ86.00 TOTAL SI1,332.00 S TOTAL El\:ì> PA.."ŒLS $26,729100 Rece!ved Time Ja n. 13, 6: 34PM L A M I N A T E T o p s ~ FmST FLOOR 3 CTR26-1 0& SECO~1> FLOOR 4 CTR 26" x 72" ReceJved T;:ïJe Jan. 13. 6:34PM '-' $486.50 $324,50 TOTAL LAMINATE TOPS --.- - - - - $1,459.50 $1,29S.00 $2,757.50 - - - -- - I' '-" ...""" FIRST FLOOR 3 42/1 Round Table @ $229.00 ] = $ 687.00 Children: s Activity 12 Armless Junior Chairs @ $82,00 "'" 984.00 1 Index Table Double Tier (6 Place) = 1~964.00 ~J Lecturn with Sound on Casters "- íYlte-knj 1'0[;1>1 "'" 975.00 * 1 Dictionary Stand - Second i/uc¡- = 651 .50 F 1 Atlas Stand - 5t. C (.;)1 d -( I 0 C v- = 1,037.00 2 3 Place P.AC. Terminals @ $2123.S0 = 4,247.00 U .. Doable Face Study Carre1s @ 5919.00 = 2,757.00 j 3 Single Face Study Carrels (1) @ $534.00 (ST) = 534.00 R (2) @ $402.00 (ADD) "'" 802.00 60" Round Reading Tab1e ::!; 745.00 N 1 72" Round Computer Table = 875.00 1 4811 x 60" Reading Table ='" 493.50 I 1 Beta. 60" x 30" Tabie (Cire. Workroom) "'" 344.50 1 48" Round Reading Table ~ 447.50 T SO AImless Stacking Chairs @ $60.00 = 3,000.00 18 101 Ann Chairs @ $115.00 = 2,070.00 U 7 103 Armless Chairs @ $100.00 = 700.00 12 Panel Single Lounge Chairs @ $550,00 = 6,600.00 R 4 24" Round Tables @ 5210.00 == 840.00 18 Sta.1fErgonomic Chairs @ $180.00 = 3,240.00 E 4 Supervlsor High Back Chairs @ $275,00 = 1,100,00 4 Book Trucks - Double Sided @ $225.50 "'" 902.00 1 Depressible Book Truck = 935.00 15 5 Tier Paperba.cklCassette Displayers @ $500.00 = 7.500.00 TOTAL $44,430.50 R.eceived Time r'n lJ 5:00PM .. Ii. I ~I --- - -..- - - -. - ''w' ~ SECOND FLOOR Employee Lounge \eSS 1 Single Lounge .y+ 0-- v \\'\ $ 550.00 ' ('7 = ~ \ì 0.- \ 1 Triple Lounge =:: 775.00 F 2 Beta. 4211 Square Tables @ S332.oo = 664.00 12 Sled Base Upbolstered Seat/Back Chairs @ $150.00 "" 1,800.00 U 1 Coffee Table 2011 x 30" = 175.00 i-1- ,," . i, ¡ L,h.) " l~ v R Studv Room . N 2 Tables 84" x 30n $529.50 == $ 1,059.00 4 Arm1ess 103 Chairs @ $100.00 = 400.00 I Reference T ' 1 Table 60" x 48'1 ~ $ 493.50 .~ 1 Reading Table 9611 X 4811 (t~lûc\:: uJì~\ t:xìd'ln~ ·-j-cLble.. = 723.S0*~ J U ·2 Reading Table 6011 x 4811 @ $528.00 = 1~056.00 Round Table 84" (Current Pap~) = '1,050.00 R 1 Computet Table 84" = 1,150.00 1 6 Sta.tion P.A.C. Terminal ~crof1l.m) = 3,177.50 E 2 Double Face Si:udy Carrels @ $919.00 "" 1,838,00 1 Table 20" x 30" "" 175.00 10 Single Panel Loungers @ 5555.00 = 5,550.00 r;~ 101 Arm Chairs @ $115.00 "" 3,:1:35.00 9Ao ad- % 103 Armless Chairs @ $100.00 ::; ~ c:2¡JoD 6 Single Face Computer Carr~ (2) @ $534.00 (ST) ~ 1,068.00 (4) @ $401.00 (ADD) "'" '1,604.00 .3 Ju~(vì.5()ý' IA,~ ~act chalvs (iJ Jfol1S' gJ5: oò Received Tice J an. 13, 6:34PM 4 Set H b"'-S (:; t1 Q)YI ,'c Cht1Ì(s @ II ~O Î d, c- () D I' F U R N I T U R E ."-' .....,¡ SECOND FLOOR - C9ntinued Periodical Reading Lounge 10 Club Chairs Grade 2 Fabric @ $545,00 1 60" Round Table Sunburst Top 1 42" Square Monterrey Table 5 Armless 103 Chairs @ $100.00 )'1icrofllm/Microfiche 5 VR11 Film Cabinet (880 Cap ea.) @ $1,450.00 2 VF9 Microfiche Cabinets @ $1,350.00 (115,800 Microfiche each) 1 10 Drawer Map Fi1e 1 Base For M.ap File 3 Vertical File Cabinet (Tax Forms) @ $230.00 6 4 Dra.wer Lateral Files @ S400.00 Received Time . I 4 Ja n. 1 , ô:26PM = $5,450,00 = 1~229.S0 = 634.00 "'" 500.00 = $7,250.00 = 2,700,00 1,350,00 190.00 690.00 2.4OQ,00 = :: = = TOTAL ~-r.ôÔ 40,5Se,CD I' E X E C U T I V E M A N A G E R S S T A F F '-' ""'" FIRST AND SECO:sn FLOOR Executive Offices Assistant Manager 66" x 30" Single Pedesta] BoxIBQ:itlFiJe w. Curved Modesty Panel w. Grommet 60" x 24'; Return Right w. Grommet 8411 X 24" Rerurn/Lateral File.Right 2 - 82/1 x 36" Bookcases @ $597.50 ea. 36' w, File Cabinet to Ho1d (4) 12" Drawers 2 - Counterweights @ $37.72 1 . :Meet Back Ergonomic:Mgt. Cha.ir Grade 2 Fa.bric .¡ - Open Arm Side Chair Grade 2 Fabric 3· Wire Managers @ S31.00 eD.. Secretary 66U x 3011 Single Pe:destaJ BoxfBoxlFile w. Curved Modesty Panel w. Grommet 60" X 24'1 Return Right w. Grommet 72'1 x 2411 Return w. Lateral File Right 1 - Med.Ba.ck Ergonomic Mgt Chair Grade 2 Fabric 1 - Open Arm Side Chair Grade 2 Fabric 3 .. Wire Managers @ $31.00 ea. .:f- $5)365.96 . 5984.00 443.50 1,006.00 1~195.00 206.00 75.44- 458.50 314,00 92.00 3)288.00,* 984.00 443.50 996.00 458.50 314.00 92.00 File Room / ~ 36" Lateral File Cabinets with Lock/12 Drawers/Counterweights S(,o,Jf .¿a.. R ed ~ . 14 5'2(?M e c e jy .I ¡ In e Jan..i.. ,~.. ;;K: u.,Ì()ý~nj ÔJ\ -tiest- -H J \.,l\"es ~ ýeCluce.- ~DS+ ~ S 60/ ~ ¡ \w .....,¡ E X E C U T I V E FIRST AND SECOSD FLOOR - Continued . Library MaI1ager 7811 x 3011 Desk 1 Pedestal BoxIBoxIFile Curved 1vf odesty 2 Returns (Left) 3 Wire Mangers 15011 Hutch, Tackboard TElskl1ght 2 - 82" x 36" Bookcases Medium Back Ergonomic Mgt. Chair 1 Sotà Gïade 2 Fabric 1 Club Chair 1 CDffee Table 4811 x 18" 1,021.50 1,449.50 92.00 1)058.00 1,195.00 458.50 969.50 545.50 272.50 M A N A G E R S Conference Room l.(sc '2-yì~tìnc, ft¡-blt h(il1~1-¡;d .l\'p-r- 96" x 4811 Boa.t Shaped Conference Table w. 8 Mid Back Chairs on Casters - Closed Arms Managers/Staff per Attached WOY í< ..5+a-/1 C1ì.s -r;r~ /1- e(ìì pi ar{!(:'.5 TOTAL S T A F .t: wDd\"ì~ on +he,e Ji'5 urtS -/0 ICeAUC <è Gorl F R e ~ e I' V e Û· ~., J! m 0 ~,,' · ¡; . 21 PH . ~ ¡ a a. 1 t:. ..;. ':!: .)~ :t 7,062.00 * ~ 29.160.00 $50.291.80 U~~~.Ølaed1/11/99L~_. .._ _~ . _~~., .. . ~. IJelr:ripdof!.-._.. _ -4 ._._~ I No.~. ..._.___~~_~!L ~~--1.~. ~IJt ,..., 0110 53't\ x fH'w F.bric PrM'i Cntde 1 HFS5360 $481.00 5 $2,405.00 PanelTII#'s: 1,.5,6,11,12 S3-t\ 1( 3O-W Fabric Panel; CinIde 1 HFs.5330 $319.00 .. $1,216.00 Panel TII #'1: 2, 4, 8, 10 5311 x 24"w F.bric: Panel; Grade 1 HFS5324 $2M.QO .. $1,136.00 PwIeI Tq lis: 3,"1,9,13 53"h Panel End Cap TAECS53 $S2.OO 8 $416.00 53.... Comer Panel Connec:tDr¡ Paint CCS3 $95.00 2 $190.00 .531\ 3·w.y ".nel Connector¡ Palht ClS3 $104S.oo J $4JS.DO 068"11 rr' WIIIU ConrteCtor c:a.48 $31.00 5 $18!.OO 30'd;lt 6O"w Woricsudaœ¡ T-~d. WlAZ3œoT $201.00 4 $8G4.oo 2"'d x 6O'w WorlcIuñaœ¡ T.Edøe WlAZ2-46OT $1 '0,00 -4 $680.00 2\1d x 42"w WorbuJfce¡ T -Ed. WLAZ2042T $135.00 4 $5..0.00 6O-w Low Side Shelf LSM6bS $139.00 4 $556.00 :ad 8oxIISc»r/f11e ~i Sys plJll FPF3S22 5587.00 4 $2.348.00 204'd ~ RIlht CA$J41t.8r $30.00 4 $120.00 30'd~; left CÅSJOLBT $34.00 4 $136.00 24'd:le 2"" h.-I End Lei Wt.ML2427 $212.00 4 S~8.00 30'd x 2"" Pinel End lei WLMIU027 $2.39.00 " $9.56.00 Flat II-=k.t CB, $6.00 16 596.00 T.f~Ü.t, ~. ., ;¡111ò:"M--'''~ ....Ia T.......__II.........~'n.-_..-...- V-~"............---.....- I 1& .. ---......___ t; ~..: _;tl'i__........__~_~~._.______.!13,'2~ ..... 2 of to 53"h x 6O"w F.bric Panel; Orade 1 HFSS360 $481.00 3 51,443.00 Pinel T.,#'1: 1~, 19,20 SJ'1\ x 30'\\1 Fabnc Panet; Crade 1 HFS5330 $319.00 , 52,233.00 Pinel T..#'I: 13,15, 17,.21, 2~, 27,30 53"h:le 24"" Fabric Panel; o.de 1 HFSS324 $284.00 5 $ 1,420.00 Pinel Tq #'I: 16¡ 18, 23, 26, 29 53"h x 4.tW F.bric Panet; CnIde , HFS5342 S"ågg.oo 3 51,191.00 PaMI TIS #'1: 22, 2.5,28 !3"h Panel End Cap TAECS.53 $.S~.oo 6 $312.00 4811 st.ndard PInel CorInec:tDr CA48 $17.00 6 $102.00 '3"h Corner Pinel ConnedDr; Paint CC53 '* $95.00 ,3 ~ S28S.DO .53'" 3-WIy Panel Connedl:Jr; PaInt CIS3 S1"~.OO 4 $580.00 Bale Powwr Feed¡ ;·Wft RPFS73 $124.00 1 $124.00 JO"w Power Hames; 7~Wln: PHRJ073 $142.00 2 $284.00 4Tw ~r Hamell; 7-Wlre PHR4273 $149.00 3 $447.00 24'w ~ Himes¡ 7·Wlre PHR2473 $72.00 2 $1"".00 CIft:uft 1 Slmp&ex: 7·W¡r. ASlU1i3 $10.00 3 $30.00 On:ult2 SlmphNc; 7-Wire ASR3273 '10.00 3 $30.00 c:ln:uit3 Slmplø; 7·wn ASR,3373 $11.00 3 $33.00 CMpJumper¡ i'-W!,. RPJC13 S3UIO 2 $68.00 3O"d x 6f1'w Worburiaœ; Toed. WlAZ306CT $201.00 3 S603.oo Page 1 of 3 ~~ Rscievsd Time Jan. 11· 6:40PM --- - --- ---- -. ..Jan- ;1.1-99 07: 57Þ BU~ & As!;ocia'\:.es ~-696:-4273 P.03 ,LIb~~ t.~~.~~l__."____,w_""~~"H'_' .....'H.-H.HW..._H_"_._..".H..__""'-... ~~·WÕrbÜrf¡œ; T:ÊdÌJ: "~~~)t-'"._'''''-'"''''H,..J:~·~õ.'''OÖ-~!J~!Y.2'''~~m:ÕÕ.!.~·!!L~1st-........ 20'd )t 4J'w Worburfaœ; T -Edf! W1AZ204:ZT $135.00 3 $405.00 ~4~dx3O"wWorburf'lœ; THEdøe WlAZ2~31)T $102.00 1 $102.00 6trw Low SIde Shttlf l.SM6OS 5139.00 3 $417.00 22'd Bœf/B0J(/FIIe Pedestal¡ Sya Pull FPF3S22 $.587.00 3 $1,761.00 .24" c:andlewr¡ ItIFt CAS2-4R8T $30.00.3 $90.00 24'd Cantile¥er; Lert CAS24UT $30.0().3 $90.00 30"d Clntdewr; !Art ~JOI.8T $34.00 3 $102.00 3D"d c.ntlJewr¡ "iøht CAS30RBt $34.00 3 $102.00 Flat 81'1c1cet C81 56.00 12 512.00 .........n........ ""'.................11..... ~.......... L .................r....Tr"................~---.....~.--.........--......................"., .!!!!.!!~..'!I!!.. ~~: '''''''.- ..."...---....._."...,.......,-,;..;--_...___......... 1 .. "..,~,~!!~ Plp3af1D 2tfd:lf 48"w Worburlac:e; PVC Ed,.. WLAZ204fIP 5156.00 1 $156.00 3Q1dx6CJlwDellcSheIl; PYCEd. TlD6030 $1þ016.00 1 $1,016.00 22'd 1kA'Ø"'1e Ptdeabù¡ 5~ Pull FPF3522 $587.00 1 $581.00 J6'w)( S ØtIWtl ~.I, Sy.r "tal! rU&36 $1,442.99 6 SB,81,œ t 121d c."~; Rlþ CAS12R8T $27.00 1 $27.00 12-d Clntilewr; lelt CAS12UT $27.00' $21.00 '~!r~'!!- ,. --" ~!.=ð"I~...--.--.:JL-.....!!W:J1.._.L"_...$124.00 --....... J~ UI~!!I!.!.~1O: ,"___ _..~ L.ð..~1)1J11f.:. .tJ"~nllO~A,.J....J__........ .......__,.. ,.. !!~!'..;!t .....4 øf 10 :wd x 481w Worbuñøœ¡ T ..Ed. WlAZ24-48T 5142.00:: $284.00 24~ ( 6O"W WoIburfmt: T·Ed,. Wl.AZ2460T $170.00 2 $340.00 48'w Low $ide sh." LSM4es S128.oo 2 $256.00 24-d:l( 2711 ÞaneI End Leg; L.en Wt.ML2427 $212.00 -4 $848.00 24-d :If 2111 P.neI End Lee: Riftrt WLMR2"2' $212.00" $IMB.DO Wall 81'8Cåt WHFM $62.00. i S434.00 . ~ ----.- ......----......,.if.. ~ I 1--"'"..'I~W-~_.......................ÞtIII~"........~....--.......1 .L..1.l!!t..I~y!.!!.t~o: . ..." ."............ !J_Lð.L~.b!..y. !1i1i .~~g~..."..."..._..__.._.__J3_t!1~.. f1 'J 1. P;,! ,.1af'10 24'd:le 12"w Worksurfø; r'Edøe WL4Z2472'T $201.00 2 $402.00 241d x 42'w Worburfac:e; THEdp WLAZ2442T $135.00 1 $13.5.00 24'd x 2~ Panel End ~ Left WLML.2-427 $212.00 2 $0424.00 24"d x 21"h Pant End leI; Rq#¡t Wt.MR2427 $212.00 2 $424.00 12'd Cantllwer; Rlre CAS12R.8T 527.00 2 $54.00 Flat 8f'1dœt C81 $6.00 4 $24.00 36'w Low sld& Shelf LSM36S $114.00 1 $114.00 2:rd 1IaJo'80J11F11e Þect.tal; S~ Poll FPf3S22 $587.00 1 S5B'.00 W.II BNdcatt WHF94 . 562.00 4 5248.00 ~'t'~ ¡~õf.~::==-=..!..~Cj~'iJJ:..9ifd{,..f.Y~I(,~~~4~::.:.:_....::.........:...~::..:~~'¥ PIp. of 10 4o~dit-eonference-:Fop ')t' a_,-l'owdero.Al ...---....,. ....-...............--..-........ JoIA' LI!!t.r.!l!.!.!!.!!.L, TlRZti S399.EJÐ J $988.00 BÐ4U1ft-- U"'.OO 3 J823.oo NIII~"""""""""-'__"II.--"""'" ,r, I.......~......--~v..... I '---'šr;ji. ........................--.,.,......._"... .......................--.-.-......~ ~11II1 ...:.t................ "'.10 53'h JC 60W FIbric Panel; Ciladl! 1 HFSS360 Panel Till #'I: 43,47,48,51,52,56 .53'h x 301w Fabric Panel: Or 1 HFS5330 Panel T.. ,~: 45, -'9, 50, 54 $481.00 6 $2,886.00 $319,00 4 $1,276.00 Pap :2 of 3 ';d{)~ C~'~ú\~' _ 1~~,11. F~L~:Jt.I Jan-11-99 07:571=> au\.! 8; Assoc;ates . :-696-4273 """ P.04 .!!.b.!!!:r~~~!!!J1!.'!!.!!>. -..--.---....-.---.-----......--............"'" - ......õ¡;ir-............... i1r~ FIbric PWì;Qãd;,..~1~:·........."'..-·--·Jj~~...oo·~Y.~T~L;~~ÖÕ.!2.t!..·~1!L-..... P.neI Tal ''': 44,46,53, 55 s3'h Pllnet End Cap TAECS53 $52.00 6 $416.00 s3'h Cotner Panel CønnedDr; Paint CCS3 $9S.00" $380.00 53"h 3.w.¡ PaMI ConnedDr; PØIt OS3 51.5.00 2 $290.00 .wh..... Will CorInec:tor C848 531.00 6 $~22.00 30"d x 6O'w Worburface; T-Edøe wt.AZ306CJT $201.00 4 5604,00 24'd x 6frw WOrburllk:e; ,. .Ed. WlA%24iil:1T $170.00 4 $680.00 2O'd x 4Z'w WoricsurfKe¡ T -Edøe WLAZ204:!T S 135.00 4 $540.00 6O'w Low SIde Shelf LSM60S $139.00" S5~6.oo 22'd 8œrIImrlflle ~; S)'I Pull FPF3522 $587.00 4 $2,348.00 24'd C.ndlewt¡ Riøht CAS24R8T $30.00 2 $60.00 24'd Cantilewr; left CAS24lBT $30.00 2 $60,00 3t1d ~nttlewr; ftiøht CÞ.S3OUT $34.00 2 $68.00 30'd c..tI,...,¡ Left CA!3Ol8T 534.00 2 $68.00 24'1:1 It 271\ PInel End leg wtMR2"2'/ $212.00:2 $424.00 24'd)t 211\ Panel End L.es WLML24;P $212.00 2 5424.00 3O"d x ~r'h Panel End leI WLMIU02'! $239.00 2 $478.00 3O"dx 2111 Panel EI1d Lea WLML302:' $239.00 2 $478.00 Flat BnIclc8l CØ1 $6.00 16 $96.00 'iiiiifi:ii:................77,~.....IN.....----_...I.--....--.............._t~...~_.--'--ttt.."I......l' ..,. ........."......W~..iõ:OO' ......11"1 1 ~~"",~"V't n tNftM...-..,............-..........,_.._---.......I_.......Ø_.1i 1 -~"'"........-.............~........1. 1. , .....af10 30'd Ie 6CJIw Desk Shell; ~c Ed. TLD6030 $1,016.00 3 $3,048.00 6C1'w Low side Shelr L!M6OS $139.00 2 $27'.00 22'd ~iIe Pede.tal¡ SyI PUU FPF3S22 $587.00 1 $581.00 W.JllilcUt WHF84 $62.00 4 $248.00 ..... 1 \III.l.....................,...._...__~~.........¡~.....----....._...~__.V\ I IJI...--.....,.,..~~_____...."..I......~_ ..!!!!I.U.~ ~!.!.!!.J!.:................,..............JUI 11, ......,_~L ............,_.......'".........................I~..."... . 11111.......-...."~tl fi~:~ r "".'0 3O'd x 6t1w Desk shell; PVC Ed. TLD6030 GO'w low Side 5helf LSM60S 22-.:1 BœlSc»rlFl1e Padeetal¡ Syt Pull ~PF3S22 wall Ihadœt WHF84 .......,....J.....................-.;r . T ~......................".",., .!!?!!. U,'!" ~ 90110: ........N' '" $1,016.00 3 $3,048.00 $139.00 2 5218.00 $587,00 1 $587.00 $6Z,00 4 5240.00 ...........t..I-...--...---~...MMM.........._.........................-.IIIM..-AJ.... ~.t..~....ii"1i1'OO '-.'''\1 .. II w."......,R-....n............................~....._M......"".......,11 .....M.::::t.!...--...... hp10af10 Wd Jt 84-W Worbuñac:e¡ T-Edp WlAZ3O&iT 3O"d x:z7'h 'T"J~¡~ ~.ð.3~..... .!!!!Ib UattJ~..J9.!!J!~...n fI IHIMIII___~. . .tIwena LlbtMan1 3D'd Ie 6O"w Desk SheIt¡ fIVe ed~ Tl.D6Q3o S1,D'\6.oo 3 $3þ48.00 6f:J'w Low Side Sheff lSM60S '$139,00 2 $278.00 22'd 8~wcIfØe ~~; S)'S Pull FPFJS22 $587.00 1 $587.00 w.1I8raclœt WHF84 Só2.00.. $.2048.00 ·f.llII.",D ~an:-- r I <I --.·~.........,..__~.............__..'_.....nw..... ..., U IUJ.U .t.111~.....,_....,..I' I ~ fill. --'.........I-~................,.............-................__..........__~~.......Ltl Ji". $296.00 1 $296.00 $162.00 3 $486.00 "...........,_fII'I......,.... ........~...""".......--............--..............-.I----.....__ '712.00 ~........-..............--.. __.........IM...~... lbdll r ... 1 f5, :00" L~~"~"" CIanci Total UIt Price: ".,1"_ .L,j( 5E320.~ ~ ) ;,¡er I ).. q J ¿tJ ~ J ____ ..-;;:=- -- P.p .3 rJ 3 4tt:>Y R;¡'¡C\I~e ~¡no I~r, R:AnPM - - ."",,- ~ ...., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C428 DATE: 1-19-99 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: OMB PRESENTED BY: Harvey M. Lincoln SUBJECT: Transfer of funds for Franchise Fee administrative costs. BACKGROUND: There are certain legal and related administrative fees associated with the administration of the Franchise Fee, which is budgeted as a revenue to the General Fund. The County Administrators Office is administering the Franchise Fee program, so it is appropriate to budget these administrative expenditures in his budget. These expenses are estimated at not-to-exceed $10,000. The attached resolution is the receipt of an unanticipated administrative fee payment of $2,500, and the line-to-line moves $7,500 into the County Administrators budget to provide for the payment of necessary fees and charges. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds available from account #001-9910-599300-800 PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the attached resolution #99-36 and line-to-line for Franchise Fee administrative costs. COMMISSION ACTION: [ ¡APPROVED [ ] OTHER: CONCURRENCE: [ ] DENIED ,/1,,-- Doug Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: :Þ .Gt,ordination/Sionatures Management & Budget: ~ Purchasing: Originating Dept: Public Works: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) __ - - ";'\ , '-' '-tII C2~ RESOLUTION NO. 99- 36 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Budget for St. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have beccme available from franchise fee administrative costs. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 19th day of January, 1999, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 1998-99, and the County's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 001-1210-313500-100 Cable Franchise $2,500 APPROPRIATIONS 001-1210-531000-100 Professional Services $2,500 - - .-.. ., ~ ...." After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis XXX Vice Chairman John D. Bruhn XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutl::hinson XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED 1rHIS 19th DAY OF JANUARY, 1999. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN . APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY --.. -/ ...., LlNE- TO-LINE TRANSFER REQUEST DEPARTMENT: OMB/COUNTY ADMIN DATE: 01/19/99 TO: 001-1210-531000-100 Profession:!1 Services $7 500 $16500 FROM: 001-9910-599300-800 Reserves $7 500 $2 865 913 REASON FOR TRANSFER: To transfer mone into Professional Services to a for administrative services for the Franchhe Fee ro ram. CONTACT PERSON: DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: ADMINISTRATION APPROVAL: H~' PHONE #: 1670 OMB NOTES: APPROVAL DATE: UNE-TO-LINE TRANSFER #: INPUT BY: DOCUMENT #: OMB:QP/GENERAUFORMSffRANSFER Eft. 10/01/95 AGENDA HEQUEST ...., ITEM NO. C-3 DATE: January 19, 1999 '-" SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] PRESENTED BY: ~~1~t~ County Engineer TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Riverland Groves Mine - Release the existing $25,300 Surety Bond from Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (d/b/a Riverland Groves) and accept the new $25,300 Surety Bond from Riverland and Indian Sun, L.C. BACKGROUND: Riverland Groves mine is located in southern St. Lucie County (S281T37S/R39E) approximately four miles south of Glades Cut-Off Road, east 'of Rangeline Road, north of SFWMD C-23 canal and west of 1-95. This 43-acre parcel received a conditional use and permit approval by the Board on August 22, 1989. The BOCC renewed the permit an additional four years on April 19, 1994. On November 3, 1998 the BOCC issued a six year mining permit to the new owner, Riverland and Indian Sun, L.C. This request is to seek Board approval to release the existing $25,300 Surety Bond from Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (d/b/a Riverland Groves) and accept the new $25,300 Surety Bond from Riverland and Indian Sun, L.C. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: August 22, 1989: Mining permit and Conditional Use approved by the Board. August 22, 1993: Permit expired. April 19, 1994: BOCC renewed mining permit an additional four years. November 3, 1998: BOCC issued six year mining permit to new owner. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval to release the existing $25,300 Surety Bond from Metropolitan Life Insurance Co. (d/b/a Riverland Groves) and accept the new $25,300 Surety Bond from Riverland and Indian Sun, L.C. N: CE: Dougl Anderson Coun Administrator [ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: [x]County Attorney [x]Originating Dept. Public works~ P' I ! "- Coordination/Sianatures : ]Community Dev. :x]Co. Eng ~ [ ]Property Acquisitions [ ]Finance Dept. ., '-' .'wI os , INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: FROM: Richard Bouchard, Civil Engineer Daniel S. Mcintyre, County Attorney vJr 98-1904 CA. NO. DA TE: December 23, i[ 998 SUBJECT: Riverland and In:Han Sun, L.Ci Reclamation Bond Agreement & Draft Mining Permit The new bond is approved as to form. The existing bond can be released. DSM/caf @ Œ n Dn ß ¡~ OOlŒ DEC zL;JW ENGINEERING : t ~~~ '-' .'wI Boftd No _ 79013042783988 fiQND KNOW ALL HEN BY THesE PRESENTS= That RIVERLAND AND INDIAN SUN, L.e. ; ê.S Pc incipal, and UNITED STATES FIDELITY AND GTJARAijTY rOMPANV as Surety, ace held an::i firmly bound Jnto the BOARD OF COUNTY COlU1ISSIONERS. OF ST_ LUCIE COUNTY.. FLORI.DA.. Obligee, in the sum of TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED AND 00/100---the paym,~nt of wh ich said Pe inci.pal ¿lnò Surety bind themselves anò their ::>uccessors and assigns f irmJ.y by these presents. Tbe conòition of this obligation is such that: WHEREAS, tbe Principal has made application to the Obligee for the issuance by the Obligee of a permit foe the mining and removal of CEMENTED COOUINA. pnT HATERIAL AND SAND from land ow~ed or leased by RmBLAmLMl) INDIAN SUN, I. C' ~d descr ibed as THE NORTH 650 FEET OF TH~ F.AST 7887 FF.F.T OF ž"F.C'TTON 7R 'J'()W1I!C;PTP ,7 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. ST. UJCIE œTT~Y+- FT.ORTnA , anà WHEREAS.. as a condition of the mining.. permit... the Principal will be required to perform and carry out certain watee control and reclamation meë$UreS in and on the land affected by such mining and removal ope,ration as set forth i.n the mining plan prepared by LINDAHL, BROWNING, FERRARI AND HELLSTROM, INC. , dated JUNE, 1998 , which mining plaµ has been filed wi th thë" st:.: Lucie ·Countyq Engineer and which was approved by the Bóard of County Commissioners.of St. Luci~ CountYr Plorida, on NOVEMBER 3, 1998 . NOW.. THEREFORE, if the Principa1 shall fully observe and comply with the water control and land reclamation require- ments of the descr~bed mining plan and mining perffiit, shall fUlly perform the duties rëquired by all applicable laws and regula- tionsr and shall repair or ~ay all costs of repair for any road damage that may result from" operations conducted u'nder the mini:""!'::; permi.t, then this obligation shall þe null and void; otherwise this bond shall remain .in f":.111 force and effect_ IN wrx'NËSs WHERBO:¡?" the Principal and Surety have caused this Bond to be executed by their"proper offi.cers thereunto duly authorized this 14TH day of DECEMBER, 1998 PRINCIPAL: SORETY : INQUIRIES: (813}" 281-2095 .., " ... .- -.. '-" ...,; 1736708 (~u S F+G" United States Fidelity and Guaranty Complany PfJwer 9f Attt'mey No. 110316 Know all men by these presents: That United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a corporation organized and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland and having its principal office at the City of Baltimore. in the State of Maryland. does hereby consliwte and appoint James W. Dunn, Mirna Ramos, David H. Carr, Denise Taylor: Stanley J. Senecal, J. Robert Hiatt and R. Julianne Cockey of the City of 'i'ampa . Stat~ of Flo ['ida i!S true and lawful Attorne.r,sHn-[;¡ct each in their separate capacity if more than one is named above. 10 sign its name as surety to. and to exec:Jte, s<!al and acknowledge any and all bonds. undenakings. contracts and other written instruments in the nature thereof on behalf of the Company in its business of guaranteeing the fidelity of persons; guaranteeing the performan:e of contracts; and exe¡;uting or guaranteeing bonds and undenakings required or permitted in any actions or Pfocee<lings allowed by law. In Witness Whereof. the said United States Fidelity ar.d Guaranty Company. has caused this instrument to be sealed with its corporate seal. duly attested by thesignawres of its Vice P~~sident 3n" "".,.tant Secretary. this 26th doyof September . A.D. 1997. Uni:ed SIt!es Fidelity and Guaranty ~o~ (Signed) By -_...........,,&~l.Æ.-ø.~.......__.. Vice President '"'''''' Ð, =rL--¿.~s;;;;;;;,-- . ~() ~,~ \\) /'\ , >..\-1 On this 26th day of September ,A.D. J9'97 . before me ~~càme Gary A Wilson. Vice President of United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, and Thomas E. HuibregtSe. As.sistant Sea~~( said Company, wi~ Whom I am persona~~inted, who being by me severally duly~, said. that they, the said Gary A. Wi. .llson and Tho~s E. Hui~ were ~~ ~President and the ~~'Seaetary of ~ said Un~d States fidelity and Guaranty Company. the corporation described In and...~ éxecuted t'le for~ fOwer of Attorney; tIJa¡ ~ aíi knew the seal of saId corporation; that the seal affixed to said Power of Attorney was such corporate ~I~~ it was so affuœ!!,. 'œ:~ ~ the Board of D.(~\ì'¡--Said corporation. and that they signed their names thereto by like order as Vice President and Assistant ~tàry. respectjvely,I!.~~~ny. Á"'l ~),-1-"" MYCom~~iresthe 1st da:~ ~~~ A. ~~0t} Y¿~j A.: Jf- (G';<>:~ (Sig~I'; BY---.:!.L2:~~~----.--.(I.-t.!......~4¡~~q.l<..... .~ .\...J. .;( O'V ¡J ~~ ~~.. This Power of Attorney is granted under and,by~ty cf the following Resolutions adopted by the Board of Directors of the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company on September 24.1992: ' Resolved. that in connection with the fidelity and surety insurance business of the Company. all bonds. undenakings. contracts and other instruments relating to said business may be signed. executed. and aclcnowfedged by persons 01 entities appointed as Attomey(sHn-Fact pursuant to a Power of Attorney issued in accordance with these resolutions. Said Poweós) of Attorney for and on behalf of the Company may and shall be executed in the name and on behalf of the Company, either by the Chairman. or the President or an Executive Vice President. Dr a Senior Vice Presitlent. or a Vice President or an Assistant Vice President jointfy with the Secretary or an Assistant Secretary; under their respective designations. The signature of such offi(:ers may be Ëmgraved, printed or lithographed. The signature of each of the foregoing officers and the seal of the Company may be affixed by facsimile to any Power of Attom~ or to any certificate relating thereto appointing Attorney{sHn-Fact for purposes'onIy of e¡œa¡ting and attesting bonds and undertakings and other writings obligatory in 1he nature thereof. and subject to any limitations set forth therein, any such Power of Attorney or certificate bearing such facsimile signature or facsimile seal shall be val id and binding upon the Company and any such power SO e¡œa¡ted and œrtffied by such facsimile signature and facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Company with respect to any bond or undertaking to which it is validly attached. Resolved. That Attomey(sHn-Fact shall have the power and authority. and. in any case. subject to the terms and limitations of the Power of Attorney issued to them. to execute and deliver on bebalf of the Company and to attach the seal of the Company to any and all bonds and undenakings, and other writings obligatory in the nature thereof. and any such instrument executed by such Attorney(s)-in Fact shall be as binding upon the Company as if signed by an Executive Officer and sealed and attested to by the Secretary of the Company. I. Thomas E. Huibregtse. an Assistant Seaetary of the United States fidelity and Guaranty Company, do hereby certify that the foregoing are true excerpts from the Resolutions of the said Company as.adopted by its Board of Direc:tors on September 24.1992 and that these Resolutions are in:U1I forte and effect. .. I. the undersigned Assistant SecretaryQf the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, do hereby certify that the foregoing Power of Attorney is in full force and effect and has not been revolŒd. In T estÎmony Whereof. I hdve hereunto se, my hand and the s.!àl of the United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company. on this 14TH day of DECEMBBR ,1998 State of Maryland) SS: Baltimore City -r!.=<>.(,!!.&!,,i~;;;;;;;;;;~~.... FS 3(12/96) ~ '-' """'" AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. t - 4- DATE: January 19, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] TO: Board of County Commissioners PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Mosquito Control Anna Smith. Assistant Director SUBJECT: Resolution No. 99-32 - Amending Resolution 98-237 to expand the area of review of the "Blind Creek Advisory Committee" to the entire Indian River Lagoon Blueway and change the name of the Committee to the "Blueway Advisory Committee". BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: Board approval of Resolution No. 98-237 on October 13, 1998. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt proposed Resolution 99-32 as drafted. SSION ACTION: NCE: [ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ~ Anderson Administrator County Attorney: Originating Dept.~ Review and Auurovals Management & Budget_ Purchasing: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable L Eff. 5/96 '-' ....; c4 INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Anna Smith, Assistant Mosquito Control Director DATE: January 8, 1999 SUBJECT: Resolution No. 99-32 - Amending Resolution 98-237 to expand the area of review of the "Blind Creek Advisory Comnùttee" to the entire Indian River Lagoon Blueway and change the name of the Committee to the "Blueway Advisory Committee". BACKGROUND On October 13, 1998, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Resolution No. 98-237 creating the Blind Creek Management Plan Advisory Committee pursuant to Section 259.032(10), Florida Statutes. The purpose of the Committee was to provide input into the development of the required management plan for the Blind Creek Preserve site. To avoid creating an advisory comnùttee for each CARL-owned/coutlty-managed site requiring a management plan, Resolution No. 99-32 proposes to amend the review area of the existing advisory committee to the entire Indian River Lagoon Blueway. This allows for one committee to provide a consistent and comprehensive approach to the development and implementation of management plans for the preserve areas adjacent to the Lagoon. Resolution No. 99-32 also proposes to change the name of the Blind Creek Management Plan Advisory Committee to the Blueway Advisory Committee. RECOMMENDA TION/CONCLrSION Staff recommends that the Board of County Comnùssions adopt proposed Resolution No. 99- 32 as drafted. Respectfully submitted, ~-~ ~-~ Anna mith Assistant Mosquito Control Director Attachment AS/ \....i ....., HESOLUTION NO. 99-32 A RESOLUTION À.vIENDlL'fG RESOLUTION NO. 98-237 WIDCR CREATED THE "BL~l) CREEK ADVISORY COlYINIITTEE" TO EXPAND THE AREA OF REVIEvV OF THE COlYIlYIITTEE TO THE ENTIRE INDIAN RlVER LAGOON BLUEW A Y AND CHAJ.'fGE THE NAME OF THE COlV(MITTEE TO THE "BLUEWAY ADVISORY COlYINIITTEE" WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida. has made the following determinations: 1. Section 259.032(10), Florida Statutes (1997) requires that beginning in fiscal year 1998-99, the management plan required under Section 253.034(4), Florida Statutes (1997) for Conservation and Recreational Land ("CARL") public lands shall be developed with input from an advisory committee composed of representatives of the lead local land managing agency, co- managing entities, local private pnperry owners, the appropriate soil and water conservation district, a local conservation organlzation, and a local elected official. 2. The County, with th~ assistance of CARL funds, has acquired certain properties located within the Indian River Lago:m Blueway (the "Blueway"), and intends to acquire additional Blueway properties. 3. The County is required to submit a management plan for each Blueway site pursuant to Section 253. 034(4). 4. On October 13, 1998, the Board adopæd Resolution No. 98-237 which created the Blind Creek Management Plan Advisory Committee pursuant to Section 259.032(10) to assist in the preparation of the Blind Creek Management Plan. 5. In order to provide fer a more efficient and consistent approach to the development of the management plans for Blueway sites, the Board has determined that it is appropriate to expand the purview of the Blind Creek Management Plan Advisory Committee to include all Blueway sites. NOW, THEREFORE, BE lT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Sl Lucie County, Florida: Underlined words and phrases are added. Struck through words and phrases are deleted. 1 '-' ....,,¡ 1. Resolution No. 98-237 is amended as follows: 1. Pursuant to Section 259.032(10), Florida Starures, this Board hereby establishes the Bl-i:OO-Crcc:,:: Park Bluewav Advisory Committee to provide input in the development of the management plans. required for the Dlind Crc,:;\: Park Indian River Lagoon Bluewav sites under Section 253.034(4), Florida Starures. 2. The Committee shall be composed of the following members: A. St. Lucie County Administrator, or his designee. B. St. Lucie County Mosquito Control Director, or his designee. C. St. Lucie County Leisure Services Director, or his designee. D. Representative of Sr. Lucie County Soil and Water Conservation District. E. Representativ~ of former mind Crcek Prcserfc property owners of the sites. F. Representativ,~ of South Hutchinson Island property owners appointed by the Board of County Commissioners. G. Representativl~ of North Hutchinson Island property owners appointed by the Board of County Commissioners. C. Reprcsentativc of rIorida PO'v'V'cr and Light Company. H. Representative of Conservation Alliance. 1. Representative of Earth's Millennium. J. Representatin of Independent Traditional Seminole Nation of Florida. K. Member of th,~ Board of County Commissioners appointed by the Chairman. L. As he determines necessarv. the County Administration mav appoint additional n01-voting members from agencies. organizations. groups. or individuals w.th particular expertise or interest in a specific site to provide input in the development of the management plan for that site. 3. The Committee shall hold at least one public hearing within Sr. Lucie County on the each proposd management plan prior to its submission to the Board of County Commissior.ers for authorization to submit to the State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection. The management plan prospectus required pursuant to Section 259.032(9)(b), Florida Statutes, shall be available to the public for review for a period of thirty (30) days prior to the public hearing. Notice of the public hearing shall be posted at each site the mind Creck Park, advertised in a paper of general circulation in St. Lucie County at least ten (10) days prior to the public hearing, and announced at a scheduled meeting of the Board of County Commissioners prior to the public hearing. 4. The Committee shall serve until the all required Bluewav management plans. ~ are approved by th~ State of Florida Department of Environmental Protection. Underlined words and phrases are ldded. Struck through words and phrases are deleted. 2 '-' "wi 5. The County Administrator is hereby directed to submit a copy of this resolution to the Sta:e of Florida Department of Environmental Protection. 2. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. After motion and second, the vote :m this resolution was as follows: Chainnan Paula Lewis XX Vice-Chainnan John Bruhn XX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XX Commissioner FramlÌe Hutchinson XX Commissioner Doug Coward XX PASSED AND DlJL Y ADOPTED this day of . 1999. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COM..tvIISSIONERS ST. LUCIE ÇOUNTY, FLORIDA BY BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRl\iIA.L~ APPROVED AS TO FORlVI A1~D CORRECTNESS: BY: COUNTY ATTORNEY g:\atty\resoltn\1999\99-32. wpd 117199 Underlined words and phrases are added. Struck through words and phrases are deleted. 3 --, ......... AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: ~O~::::O~::IO~; [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: ¡fr Originating Department: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Community Development ....., ITEM NO. C-~h_ DATE: 01/19/99 CONSENT X REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [] Quasi-Jud. [ PRESENTED BY: Co Request for final plat approval r the as Whimbrel Landing SID located 0 the s uthwest corner of the intersection of North SR A-1-A and Jack Island Access Road. Charles E. Wickard has submitted a plat for a 6-lot single-family residential subdivision known as whimbrel Landing SID on an 8.79 acre parcel. (File No.: SP-98-038) N/A On January 23, 1998, the St. Lucie County Community Development Director, through Community Development Order 98-004, granted approval to the minor site plan for Whimbrel Landing SID. Approve the final plat of Whimbrel Landing SID and authorize its final execution. DENIED ~riew and ~provals Management & Budget: Other: as M. Anderson Administrator Purchasing: Other: - - .--F ' \..-t .....I ~~ COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: 01/19/99 MEMORANDUM DEPAR1rn{ENTOFCO~TYDEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Raymond L. Wazny, Community Development Director Date: January 13, 1999 Subject: Petition of Charles E. Wickard for final plat approval for a 6-lot residential subdivision to be known as Whimbrel Landing Subdivision On January 23, 1998, the S1. Lucie County Community Development Director granted approval of a minor site plan for a 6-lot residential !mbdivision to be known as Whimbrel Landing Subdivision proposed to be located at the southwest comer of the intersection ofN orth SR A -1- A and Jack Island Access Road. The associated final plat for this subdivision was received in the office of the Community Development Director on December 30, 1998. In accordance with the provisions of Section 11.03.03(D) ofthe S1. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby requested to approve the plat for the subdivision to be known as Whimbrel Landing. This plat was detennined to meet all applicable provisions ofthe S1. Lucie County Land Development Code and Chapter 177, Florida Statutes on January 6, 1999. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. SUBMITTED· cc: Ron Harris, County Surveyor Dan McIntyre, County Attorney David Hays, Civil Engineer Charles E. Wickard File " ~ -.,. ...." AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-5B DATE: January 19, 1999 CONSENT x] REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ Quasi-JD. SUBJECT: Consider approving an Int,~rlocal Agreement between the Board of County commi sioners and the St. Lucie County Fire District for the establishment of a single point of collection for all required Fire Department :Juilding permit and inspection fees to be assessed by the St. Lucie county Fire District in regard to new construction and other activities requiring the issuance of a building permit. . ector TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Community Development BACKGROUND: On December 16, 1998, the St. Lucie County Fire District approved Resolution #331 establishing a schedule c,f fees and charges for Construction plan Review, Inspections, Site Plan Reviews, and Technic,il Assistance that is to be assessed for all construction aètivities requiring the issuance 01: a building permit and requiring any type of Fire Department plan Reviews or Inspection. ~~hese fees would be assessed at the time of issuance of a building permit and will be used 1:0 suppor.t the operations of the Fire prevention Bureau. The attached Interlocal Agreement between the County and the Fire District that would provide for the County to act as I:he collecting agent for these fees, and then the County would remit back to the Fire District the collected fees, less a minor administrative charge. This method of collection is identical to the methods that are used with the Countywide Impact Fee Program. The purpose of having one point of fee collections is to minimize the necessity for the building permit applicant to go to multiple offices to pay his fees and to expedite the time required to process a building permit. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approvil of the Draft Interlocal Agreement between the Board of County Commissioners and the St. Lucie County Fire District for the establishment of a single point of collection for all required ·Fire Department building permit and inspection fees to be assessed by the St. Luo:ie County Fire District in regard to new construction and other activities requiring the issuance of a building permit. APPROVED OTHER: DENIED COMM SSION ACTION: C~ordination/Siqnatures County Attorney: Mgt Î< Budget: Purchasing: originating Dept: Other: Other: (AGEND408) Finance: (copies only) : '--' .."I C~)b ,:::OUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: January 19,1999 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Ray Wazny, Community Development Director DATE: January 12, 1999 SUBJECT: Consider approving an Interlocal Agreement between the Board of County Commissioners and the St. Lucie County Fire District for the establishment of a single point of collection for all required Fire Department building pennitand inspection fees to be assessed by the S1. Lucie County Fire District in regard to new construction and other activities requiring the issuance of a bui:.ding pennit On December 16, 1998, the S1. Lucie C:>unty Fire District approved Resolution #331 establishing a schedule of fees and charges for Construction Plan Review, Inspections, Site Plan Reviews, and Technical Assistance that is to be asses:;¡ed for all construction activities requiring the issuance of a building pennit and requiring any type of Fire Department Plan Reviews or Inspection. These fees would be ass,essed at the time of issuance of a building pennit and will be used to support the operations of the Fire Prevention Bureau. Attached, is a copy of an Interlocal Agreement between the County ' and the Fire District that would provide for the County to act as the colleeting agent for these fees, and then the County would remit back to the Fire District the collected fees, less a minor administrative charge. This method of collection is identical to the methods that are used with the Countywide Impact Fee Program. The purpose of having one point of fee collel~tions is to minimize the necessity for the building pennit applicant to go to multiple offices to pay his fees and to expedite the time required to process a building penni1. Staff recommends approval of the Draft Interlocal Agreement between the Board of County Commissioners and the 81. Lucie COUll1y Fire District for the establishment of a single point of collection for all required Fire Department building pennit and inspection fees to be assessed by the S1. Lucie County Fire District in regard to new construction and other activities requiring the issuance of a building penni1. \...i January 12, 1999 Page 2 If you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMITTED RW/DJM FIRE 1 (a57) cc: County Administrator Asst. County Administrator County Attorney Fire Chief Hagley Deputy Chief Parrish .....¡ Subject: InterIocal Agreement St. Lucie County Fire District APPROVED AS TO FORM Daniel S. Mcintyre County Attorney \...; ...., 1 INTER-LOCAL AGRJ~EMENT BETWEEN THE BOARD OF 2 COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, 3 FLORIDA, AND THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT 4 5 6 THIS INTER-LOCAL AGREEMENT is entered into this _day of 1999, by and 7 between the Board of County Commissioners, St. Lucie Coµnty, Florida{herein referred to as 8 "COUNTY"), and the St. Lucie County Fire District, an IndependentSpecial Taxing District 9 created under the Laws ofthe State of Florida, (herein referred to as "DISTRICT"), providing 10 for the COUNTY'S participation in the collection ofthêÐISTRICTSconstruction plan review 11 and inspection fees and technical assi stance fees associâted withl1,ew building pennitsandother 12 activities requiring the (ssuance of a building pennit.i 13 14 15 ~TNESSETH 16 17 18 WHEREAS, Section 163.01 of tt.e Florida Statut~~,~own as the "Florida Interlocal 19 Cooperation Act of 1969," authorize:; local governtnentå.l"ûmts.tomake the most efficient use 2 0 of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with ().tijerfli:)calities on a basis of mutual 21 advantage and thereby to provide services andfacilities i~:a.ïnanner and pursuant to fonns of 22 governmental organization that will accord best with g~.ographic, economic, population and 23 other factors influencing the needs and development of local communities; and 24 25 WHERE:A:S, Part I of Cha.pteri163 of thei;E'loridâ:Statutes pennits public agencies as defined 2 6 thereinito~~~~r into int a.l?a.~reements with each other to exercise jointly any power, 2 7 privilege,I~r¡:,ª:,,],thority w sU<p'lî~gencies share in common and which each might exercise 2 8 separately;a.Ií,~ 29 3 0 WHE~~S:~;:theL)~~'~~~ has âpþroved through Fire District Resolution No. 331, adopted 3 1 on December 16, 199~r:~',~~lîedule of Fees and Charges for Construction Plan Review and 32 Inspections, Site Plan:Revrews, and technical assistance to be assessed for all construction 33 activities requiring theìsstiance of a building pennit and requiring any type of Fire Department 34 Plan Reviews or Inspection. 35 3 6 WHEREAS, the DISTRICT has requested that in order to facilitate the collection of these fees, 3 7 andI1linimi¡Z;~ia.ny inconvenience to the public, that the COUNTY act as the collecting agent 38 for aportjørl of these fees associated with the issuance of a building pennit in a manner 3 9 consistent with the standard method Df building pennit fee collection presently used by the 40 County. 41 42 NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration ofthe mutual covenants, promises and representations Interlocal Agreement for Collection of Fire Inspection Fees Page 1 St. Lucie County Fire District 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 - 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ~ ...., herein, the parties hereto agree as follows: SECTION 1. PURPOSE A. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for a single point of collection for all required building permit and inspection fees, including those to be assessed by the DISTRICT in regard to new construction and other activities requiring the issuance of a building permit, whereby the COUNTY agrees to collect and remitto the DISTRICT, in the manner described below, the appropriate building permit and inspection fees for new construction and other activities requiring the issuance of a building permit. SECTION 2. GENERAL TERMS AND CONDITIONS A. The COUNTY agrees to: 1. Collect the applicable building g~~t and inspection fees for new construction and other activities requiring theis§1lanceof a building permit as specified in the DISTRICTS schedule offees and charges and as computed by the DISTRICT as part of the building permit review:processipriorto issuing any building permit or other type of .,pennit requiring Fire Department inspection within the COUNTY'S jurisdiction. The amount of the fee is initially setforth in the Fire District ResolutionNo. 331, attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A" 2. Remit to TRICT all funds collected as Fire Inspection Fees for any building new construction or other activities, with the exception of three percen the funds collected which shall be kept by the COUNTY as a fee for a nation for collecting and transmitting the funds. The COUNTY shall remit the collected funds monthly to the DISTRICT, with payme made to the DISTRICT by the 15th day ofthe month following the coll the fee. 3. Chang~,theamount of the fee to be collected upon the receipt of notice :trom the DISTiRlCT as described below. The DISTRICT agrees: 1. To provide to the County Administrative procedures and administrative assistance in setting up bookkeeping and other accounting procedures necessary for the COUNTY to collect the permit fees. Interlocal Agreement for Collection of Fire Inspection Fees Page 2 St. Lucie County Fire District 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 .19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ~ .--.,1 2. To maintain a record. of the permit fees assessed including the name, address, and amount due. 3. To the extent allowed by law and without limiting any rights the District may have under section 768.28, Florida Statutes (1998 Supplement) and other applicable law, the DISTRICT agrees to indemnify the COUNTY and hold hannless from and against all claims, demands, penalties, judgements, court costs, reasonable attorney's fees and liability arising out of this Agreement except for any such claims, demands, penalties, judgements, court costs, reasonable attorney':)'s fees and liability arising acts or oI11Î$sions of the COUNTY. 4. To provide the COUNTY with written noticeo[any duly adopted change in the fees to be collected by the COUNTY. C. This Agreement shall begin upon execution by both parties, unless terminated earlier in accordance with Section 3 ofthis AgreenîëIit. D. Modification of this Agreemmt l1~ay be reqû.e~~~'byeither party. Changes which are mutually agreed upon shall be valid only wJ:ienredµ.ceâtowriting, duly signed by each party and attached to the original Agreement. B. The DISTRICT and thei~OUNTY:šhall allovvaccess to its records during normal business hours and µ.¡jon n::asoq(i.t)le adVB.qped request of the DISTRICT or the COUNTY its empl()y~~s and ageIit$~ SECTION 3. j>ERIOD, TERMINATION EF A. This.~gJ;eem~Îi.t:;§þall beØffective for a period of ten (10) years beginning March 1, 1999. Thê . J1 of this Agreement shall not require the COUNTY to refund any monies collectØ e COUNTY and remitted to the DISTRICT pursuant to this Agreement. Tl'lê~gtêement may be extended upon mutual agreement of both parties. B. This Agreern.<:mt may be terminated with or without cause by either the DISTRICT or the COUNT"Y with thirty (30) days notice to other party. SECTION 4. NOTICE ANn CONTACT A. All notices provided under or pursuant to the Agreement shall be in writing, delivered either by hand or by first dass, certified mail, return receipt requested, to the Interlocal Agreement for Collection of Fire Inspection Fees Page 3 St. Lucie County Fire District 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ~- . ...".¡ representatives identified below at the address set forth below. For the County: With Copies to: County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34582 County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 Community Development Director 2300 Virginia A venue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 For the District: With COpy To: Fire Chief St. Lucie County Fire District 2300 Rhode Island Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 Fire Board Attomey St. LuéieCoUnty Fire District 2300 Rhode Islând Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 SECTION 5. _ ENTIRETY OF AGREEMENT D. This Agreement embodies the>whole understandingQf the parties. There are no promises, tenns, conditions or obligations other than those contained herein; and this Agreement shall supersede all previouscommunicati.ons, representations, or agreements, either verbal or written, between tbe.þarties hereto. SECTION 6. INVALIDITY OF CLAUSES A. The validity.of any portion, thereof.of the Agreement portion hereof. icle, section, paragraph, provision, clause, or any portion [lhave no effect upon the validity of any other part or SECTION 9. GATION OF DUTY A. N.othing contained herein shall be deemed to authorize the delegation of the constitutional or statutory duti,::s ofthe officers ofthe COUNTY.or the DISTRICT. SECTION 10. FILING A. This agreement and any subsequent amendments thereto shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court ofS1. Lucie County pursuant to Section 163.01(11), Florida Statutes. Interlocal Agreement for Collection of Fire Inspection Fees Page 4 St. Lucie County Fire District 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 .~ "wi' SECTION 12. EFFECTIVE DATE A. This agreement shall become effective upon the filing of a certified copy hereof with the Clerk ofthe Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreementas of the date set forth above. A ITEST: BOARD0F COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: By: Deputy Clerk Chainnan APPRO\I"EÐAS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: By: County Attorney *************** AITEST: ST. LUCIE COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT By: By: Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: By: Attorney FlREDEPT1(A57) Interlocal Agreement for Collection of Fire Inspection Fees Page 5 St. Lucie County Fire District 4. .."". '..., ITEM NO. c. - (¿, AGENDA REOUEST DATE: JANUARY 19, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ADMINISTRATION DOUG ANDERSON SUBJECT: FUNDING REQUEST FROM NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM FOR TAYLOR CREEK DREDGING BACKGROUND: SEE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM FUNDS AVAIL. (State type & No. of transaction or N/A) : N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: NONE RECOMMENDATION: STAFF RECOMMENDS SUBMITTING A LETTER TO THE NATIONAL ESTUARY PROGRAM REQUESTING $200,000 IN FUNDING TO BE USED TOWARDS THE DREDGING OF TAYLOR CREEK. APPROVED OTHER: DENIED Review and ADDrovals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ~< filE COP~ CLIFF BARNES ~& ~ MEMORANDUM CO]ONm u' . ¡ ~ \Tn / ;.1) TO: DOUG ANDERSON, COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR CLIFF BARNES, COUNTY COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT 5 ~ FROM: DA TE: JANUARY 8, 1999 FEBRUARY ~EETING RE: I spoke with Marty Smithson ofNEP today, who advised that he may not be able to attend the 2/8 meeting because of another speaking engagement. He will try to send Bob Day. However, he reconfirmed his believed that Taylor Creek is a very worthwhile project and that he has $200,000 in this year's budget that he believes could go to the project To get this process started, he needs a letter from us summarizing the project and asking for the $200k. He will take that, along with a written scope of work and schedule to the governing" board of the SJRWMD for approval. He also indicated that he has included a request for $300,000 for Taylor Creek to the Legislature for the Indian River Lagoon Initiative funding package. By my calcÙlation, that leaves us only $350k short, which FIND may be able to fund if requested by SFWMD. G cow nD D· . N 2. PAULA A LEWIS DisrriCT No. J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON. Disrricr NO.4. CLIFF OARNES. DisrriCT No.5 N D ORUHN D' . r No 1 . DOU A" .srrlCr 0 .. JOH. . IsrrlC . . 'Counry Adminisrroror _ Douglos M. Anderson 2.300 Virginia Avenue · Fart Pierce. FL .34982-5652 · (561) 462-1408 FAX(561)462-2131 . TDD(561)462-1428