Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 05-25-99MAY 25. 1492. BOAR~F COUN'~Y_ COMMT~SIONFR~ MFETI G AGENDA r'~'~TF~AT RULES~ND PROCFD Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. RFC'iTI AR AGENDA ITEMS Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PiTRLIC HEARiN S- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (I) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADD FSSINC THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PiTBLI COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five inutes. DF,('ORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEFTIN ~S- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, Fl. 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. aOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS www.stlucieco.gov May 25, 1999 9:00 A.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE Approve the minutes of the meeting held May 18, 1999. 2. GFNERAI PITBLIC COMMENT 3, CONSENT AGENDA 4. ~OMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT John D. Bruhn District 1 Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson District 4 Cliff Barnes District 5 Transportation Enhancement Applications- Consider staff recommendation to approve and support the proposed 1999 Florida DOT's Transportation Enhancement Applications for North AlA landscaping, Spanish Lakes Boulevard Bike Path and Airoso/St. James Boulevard andscaping. 5. PUBLIC WOKS Solid Waste- This item is re-agendaed from March 9, 1999 Board meeting. Consider staff recommendation to change the tipping fees for construction and demolition debris from $30 to $21 at the Glades Road Landfill. NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings ~~•ill need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-ezamine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. ~~./ 1. WARRANTS .IST Approve warrants list No. 34. 2. Pi1R ASING A. Bid No. 99-48- Consider staff recommendation to reject all bids for the purchase of /"~'\sod and the re-sprigging of Open Space Football field. B. Contract Extension- Consider staff recommendation to approve the assignment and extension of the contract for solid waste collection and disposal services with Jennings Environmental and Waste Management and authorize the Chairman to sign. C. Bid No. 99-50- Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for the annual road resurfacing contract to Ranger Construction in the not to exceed amount of $900,000. Authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. 3. INVESTMENT FOR THE F 1LTiTi?F A. Bid No. 99-38- Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for installation of park pavilions to Adnan Investment and RCD Commercial Construction. Authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. B. Stormwater Management- Consider staff recommendation to approve the grant application to the South Florida Water Management District to print and mail a Stormwater management brochtire. 4. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Indrio North Savannas Project- Consider staff recommendation to approve Amendment II to the FCT Grant Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Amendment. B. Contract Amendment- Consider staff recommendation to approve an amendment to the contract with the St. Lucie Mural Society for the Bob Gladwin Baseball Complex and authorize the Chairman to sign the amendment. C.. Children's Environmental Learning Museum- Consider staff recommendation to approve the contract with Paul Jacquin and Sons, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to ~ sign. n D. Bluefield Ranch- Consider staff recommendation to give conceptual approval to the Agreement with Florida Communities Trust and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement. ;'~E.~ Blind Creek Lease Agreement- Consider staff recommendation to approve the proposed lease agreement with the South Florida Water Management District for Blind Creek, Indian River Lagoon Tracts 100-00 through 100-011. 5. PiJBL.IC' WORKS A. Engineering- Consider staff recommendation to approve the plat and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Pod 7B at The Reserve and authorize the Chairman to execute the documents subject to final review and approval by the County Attorney. CONSENT AGENDA MAY 25, 1999 PAGE TWO Pi1B .I(' WO KS (.ON'Tl B. Engineering- Consider staff recommendation to approve the plat and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Pod 20A at The Reserve and authorize the Chairman to execute the documents subject to final review and approval by the County Attorney. 6. H 1MAN .RVI .ES Resolution No. 99-110- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution amending the Local Housing Assistance Plan for fiscal years 98-99, 99-00, 00-O1 to include a Disaster Mitigation/Recovery Contingency Strategy. 7. RISK MANAGEMF,NT Safety Handbook- Consider staff recommendation to approve the St. Lucie County Safety Handbook. 8. ADMINISTRATION Harbour Pointe- Consider staff recommendation to approve funding of the extension of Avenue M and transfer $30,000 from General Fund Contingency. 9.~ ('OMMLiNITY DEVEL.OPMF.NT ,~lY A FCT Grant Application- Consider staff recommendation to authorize staff to submit S /j,,~,~~~ the Florida Communities Trust application for the Ancient Oaks Preserve project on /~~ behalf of the County Commission. B. FCT Grant Application- Consider staff recommendation to authorize staff to submit the Florida Communities Trust application for the North Fork of the St. Lucie River Greenway Addition on behalf of the County Commission. 10. i.IBR_ARY Gates Library Initiative Grant- Consider staff recommendation to authorize staff to submit a grant request and authorize the Chair to sign at the meeting. 11. PERSONNEL Budget Amendment No. 99-119/Equipment Request Nos. 99-208, 210- Consider staff recommendation to approve the amendment and the equipment request for the purchase of software for training presentations. 12. MANA TF,MF.NT AND Bi1DGET Resolution No. 99-113- Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget resolution appropriating $22,806 in additional funds for FY99 Community Services Block Grant. ~A.1 Ordinance No. 99-21/Local Option Motor Fuel Tax- Consider staff request for permission to advertise a public hearing on the ordinance on June 15,1999 at 7 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. A.Z; Resolution No. 99-115/Public Transportation Municipal Service Taxing Unit- Consider staff request for permission to advertise a public hearing on the resolution on June 1°S"~I999 at 7`~I 2 ~ l~ or as soon thereafter as possible. ~ G~ ~k' Other- Staff to make recommendations on use of funds recieved from Walgreens free clearing penalty. - _ 'rrr/ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA - REGULAR MEETING Date: May 18, 1999 Convened: 7:05 p.m. Tape: 1-2 Adjourned: 9:1~ p.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Paula A. Lewis, John D. Bruhn, Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward, Cliff Barnes Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator; Phil Freeland, Asst. County Administrator; Dan McIntyre, County Attorney; Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director; Ray Wazny, Public Works Director ;Bill Blazak, Utilities Director, Paul Phillips, Airport Director; Harvey Lincoln, M & B Manager; Don West, County Engineer; Beth Ryder, Human Services Manager, Joe Finnegan, Personnel; Deputy Williams; A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk MINUTES (1-029) .~ It was moved by Com. Cowazd, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the minutes of the meeting held May 11, 1999; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS (1-039) Ms. Joan Walker, St. Lucie County Neighborhood Watch Association, addressed the Board regazding the Association's request the County defer the users fee of $160.00 they are being charged for Room 101. The Association presented signed petitions from their members requesting the chazge be eliminated. Mr. Charlie Parsons, Lakewood Park area resident, addressed the Board regarding the sidewalks being placed in the area. He requested the Board extend the walks to Lakeland Blvd.. Mr. Parsons also addressed the North County Water and Sewer system and asked if it will be able to service the entire north end of the county. Mr. Vinni Aquilino, Savanna Club member, addressed the Boazd in favor of eliminating the user fee for the Neighborhood Watch Association. Ms. Patricia Femck, representing the White City Improvement Club as well as the North Fork Property Owners Association, addressed the Board regazding the purchase of the Economy property and asked the Boazd to table the purchase until all the information is received and also presented the Board with letters from the organizations. Mr. Jerry Mabus, on behalf of the Association of Realtors, addressed the Board in favor of approving the Airport DRI . "- Ms. Diane Shaw, BelAir Estates resident, addressed the Boazd regarding the tennis courts lights in Lakewood Pazk. She requested assistance in having the lights turned on during evening hours. __._ ice,' ~ Mr. Bill Hearn, Indrio Road resident, addressed the Board regarding public participation on the DRI-Airport subject. The Chairman advised Mr. Hearn that there will be limited public comments. A resident of Indian Pines Village (no name given) addressed the Board regarding his present utility rates. He stated he was not in St. Lucie County 5 months out of the year and they still pay $44.00 a month for a service they are not utilizing. The Utilities Director advised the gentleman that they are not paying for their comodity when they are not here, but, they must maintain capacity at all times. These are a base facility charges. This guarantees capacity when they return. Mr. Harlan Human, So. Beach resident, addressed the Board in opposition to the $160.00 users fee. Mr. Frank Barella, St. Lucie County citizen, addressed the Board in favor of moving forward with the DRI, as well as the Airport expansion. Mr. David Frasier, former President of the SLC Neighborhood Watch, addressed the Board regarding the user fee. The Chairman addressed Mr. Frasier's comments. Ms. Mable Fawcett, North Beach resident, addressed the Board in opposition to any expansion of the airport. 3. CONSENT AGENDA (1-874) It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve the Consent Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. Warrant List The Board approved Warrant List No. 33. 2. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Emergency Medical Services Award- The Board approved the third extension of the interlocal agreement for use of funds disbursed under the County Emergency Medical Services Award and authorized the Chairman to sign. B. Jury Services Reimbursement- The Board approved accepting a check for $532.54 representing one-half reimbursement for jury services in the case of Omec v. Yang. C. Permission to File Suit- The Board approved filing suit against Archie and Sheila Jones to quiet title on property owned by the County. 3. MANAGEMENTBUDGET A. Budget Resolution No. 99-11-The Board approved the budget resolution establishing the budget for the Ideal Holding Road MSBU project. B. Equipment Request No. 99-211- Consider staff recommendation to approve the equipment request for the purchase of a State surplus Dozer for the Road and Bridge ~'~° Division. f ,.~ 05/17/99 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE FZABWARR WARRANT LIST X33- 08-MAY-99 TO 14-MAY-99 FUND SUMMARY FUND TITLE ~' EXPENSES PAYROLL ...n 001 General Fund 327,475.53 238,436.10 001116 Sec 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning 98/99 2,195.04 4,535.86 001120 Community Services Block Grnt 98/99 233.90 0.00 001217 DEP-Regional Attenuation Facility 9,338.07 0.00 001235 TDC Planning Grant 98/99 90.46 255.05 101 Transportation Trust Fund 60,690.84 87,754.44 101002 Transportation Trust/80Y Constitut 7,105.56 0.00 101006 Transportation Trust/Impact Fees 300.00 0.00 102 Unincorporated Services Fund 18,634.92 33,816.51 102001 Drainage Maintenance MSTU 1,442.06 2,917.14 102103 Urban & Community Forestry 97/98 77.05 0.00 105 Library Special Grants Fund 772.41 1,849.71 107 Fine & Forfeiture Fund 166,321.47 54,707.61 121 Blakely Subdivision Fund 66.03 0.00 140 Port & Airport Fund 24,656.49 7,277.80 160 Plan Maintenance RAD Fund 5,069.04 1,964.80 170 Court Facilities Fund 137.90 0.00 181 SLC Housing Finance Authority Fund 4,550.00 0.00 182 Envirorunental Land Acquisition Fund 706.38 1,431.39 183 Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir 2,033.05 3,222.71 183001 Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat 1,244.53 2,449.60 183002 Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat 75.00 0.00 183004 Ct Admin.- Teen Court 442.98 897.60 183204 Court Reporter Grant-In-Aid 98/99 3,447.00 0.00 183206 FDJJ-Teen Court 98/99 561.84 1,138.46 185203 FHFA-SHIP 98/99 608.40 1,232.80 186 Recycling Operating Fund 1,632.48 1,334.69 186202 DEP-Recycling & Education 98/99 219.54 444.89 315 County Building Fund 9,900.00 0.00 315201 DOS-315-Fort Pierce Branch Library 2,179.75 0.00 316 County Capital 26,004.82 0.00 382 Environmental Land Capital Fund 165,050.00 0.00 401 Sanitary Landfill Fund 20,854.61 25,806.22 418 Golf Course Fund 21,688.31 16,490.93 421 H.E.W. Utilities Fund 4,683.81 149.35 441 North Hutchinson Island Utilities 49,765.86 2,488.98 449 Capital Facilities Fund 49,532.00 0.00 451 S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund 63,391.55 2,339.64 461 Sports Complex Fund 63,752.99 9,819.37 491 Building Code Fund 8,211.66 15,019.94 501 Automated Services Fund 54,334.18 57,949.23 505 Health Insurance Fund 325,190.53 0.00 505001 Property/Casualty Insurance Fund 2,289.30 0.00 510 Service Garage Fund 16,094.98 8,527.59 611 Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund 1,887.62 2,697.31 GRAND TOTAL: 1,524,939.94 586,955.72 4. PERMISSION TO ADVERTISE/RECOMMENDED FOR A DAY MEETING County Attorney- The Board approved advertising a TEFRA hearing on A-1 Roof Trusses LTD Company on June 8, 1999 at 9:00 a.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. REGULAR AGENDA 4. UTILITIES (1-1023) Resolution No. 99-108- For consideration before the Board was to approve the resolution putting into effect a schedule fixing water and wastewater utility rates, fees and charges for customers of the North County Utility District, and providing for an effective date. Mr. Bob Bangert, representing Holiday Pines Homeowners Assoc., addressed the Board in favor of the resolution. Mr. Charlie Parsons, Lakewood Park resident, addressed the Board and asked if there would be sufficient space for future expansion. The Utilities Director advised Mr. Parsons that there would be room for expansion. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 99-108; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 5. UTILITIES (1-1023 ) A. Resolution No. 99-106- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to approved the resolution putting into effect a Uniform Service and a Uniform Extension Policy for the North County Utility District and providing an effective date. It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Coward to approve Resolution No. 99- 106; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. Holiday Pines Utility- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to approve an amendment with Avatar Utility Services, Inc., in the amount of $144,900 annually and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement and that the amendment will become effective on the closing date of the sale of the Holiday Pines System to St. Lucie County. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 6. AIRPORT (1-1226 thru tape 2) Airport DRI- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to authorize staff to rank the Airport's General Consultants for preparation of an Airport DRI including the projects listed in the Airport Business and Marketing Plan excluding lengthening runway 9R/27L. The Airport Director gave his presentation on the airport and provided exhibits for the Board's review. The Airport Director advised the that the DRI needs to be done before August 2, 1999. He has been informed that there will not be an extension on the~date. If the DRI is not done, an additional penalty is that the FDOT has participated at the tune of $156,000 for the preparation of the DRI . The DRI must include airport projects. If Airport projects are not included in the DRI they will ask for reimbursement of the funds. The Airport Director advised the Board of the three following scenarios. l.Y +Tr+r+ a--~i~t+L-J"'CC+a~s eit~i .~ .'n" ~ .ray ~~ ~i"~ ~ ~ ~`~g~/ '~' ~ ' ^lG -..'i:: M~+A..tiwY d~r= ~'~l.Ml}~~4ilSl~'eU~iN .i. -- Y. ._ ~ .. _'.....o. ~....~.-. - " ti s~ rt`-•...~•> ~icw^.t~."..'~h"^a '1.';K~'"c~ - - - ~.~.- - ~: ,.;.. J~~s^c+.^~".t -~°~~`i'd.:.%.~ t+s... ..~ _ . ; y.~ y..wsa~ • S T '~-s'i.-3c ^' d .. V ~ L O `~ /~~ CIS .~ o aQ a, u ? a C~ ^J L~ C~ ~ir o =~a~_T ~ O ~ a~ ~ Q C _ 4 ~~ ~~ • ~ ~1 OL ~ ~ u ~ ._ 7 Q V eC .a.. V • r /~\ C I~ ~I iLr "J +~ E G ~: La ~ r.+ Q ~r" ~ Q ~ ~ ~ A ~ 3 a~ a. V ~ ~ ~+ ~ ~ ~ V ~ •'~ o c •E . . .r O nr . r.l i..i r.i I: r ~ U o c L M O ~. w ~ ~ ~ [~ ~ y ~ ~ u ,Ln ~ ~ ~i • ..r C• ~ v C V y Mn ~ 0 ~ ~} `~ ~ • ~ C a ~ ~ O ~+ O •~ ~~ i..l ~.t : a ~ G ~ ~ U '~'~ ~ O cr ~, . ~ ~ . s r ~ ~ c. m ° ~; ~ j Fyn} \ V C L C ~~ C S C ~, U ~ / m _ o~? ~1 ~ a - ~ m z '''' ~ o .o A W~ca ~ • ~ ~ ^ N 3r G1 `L' Lc Y`' a O ~ ~ Q ~ ~ A ,o a ,.c E .. ~~ G o o ;~ ~=, ao ~ c ~ C; i.i o 3 a Q Q ~ ...~ ., ~1 . ~ O ~~ `° ° ~ ° ~ L ~ L o ~' `^. rl~I ~ ~ C~ '~' -ice i.. . r . ~ .~ ~ r '~ M ~ ~1 FM~ ~ ~ r ~ ,~ e ~ °O 3 ..G3. p"{ e~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • .w ~ 7 ~ G a V C ~ P~ ~ M N ~~yy rV ~ O C ~ ~ ~ " L~ ~7 ~ O ~ _ > C L u O ~~ `~ O O ~y -.I U ~y ~ .. ~ A N ~ O `/ rr ll V U W \ ~~ ~ ~1 /~ . r .r ..r ~ ~ r.~ G ~ r.~ .~ ~ ~ - ~ -- to p _ ~ ~~ ~~ .O O "C ':3 I-. C ~ O C' ~ ~ ~1 a v _~ ~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~z ••• O C ~ C C o U ~ p ~°, ~ A ~°,~ ~ w ~°,~ W L V ~ ~ Z ~ i s ~ c F ~ .~,, Com. Barnes directed several questions to the representative from the FDOT. Com. Barnes asked if the $18 million FDOT grant was given for airport development or was it given to build according to the airport master plan without deviating one inch. Mr. Matthew Thys, Aviation Supervisor FDOT District 4, advised the Board that the 1984 master plan was used as justification to purchase the additional properties for the airport. The monies were given, they were aviation dollars given to the county for this property for future airport development, that airport was identified to serve the Treasure Coast region as a commercial service airport and that was what those funds were intended for. If the county attempts to deviate from that, then the department is going to re-evaluate their participation. Com. Barnes asked if there would ever be a chance the FDOT would work with county to come up with a more realistic development that deviates from the master plan by examining real facts. Mr. Thys stated the State of Florida is not going to require the county to develop an airport to meet traffic that does not exist, however, from a Florida Aviational System Planning stand point, there is a gap of commercial service airport between the Orlando region and the South Florida region. Back in 1984, it was established that St. Lucie County was to serve that purpose for the Treasure Coast region. The property was purchased based on this information. The FDOT is working with the county in the sense that things have been tailored back significantly and are looking to develop for the general aviation needs of the community right now, however, the areas that were identified for airport expansion, shall be protected according to the State of Florida. Mr. Thys stated that if the county changes the airport master plan, the FDOT will re-evaluate their participation in the property and the county could be subjected to returning the funds to the FDOT. Com. Barnes asked why is the agency requiring the county to move forward with the DRI . Mr. Thys stated, aviation dollars were used to complete the DRI for the airport and if there is not going to be an aviation element for that DRI, then the department would have not had a need to put aviation fuel taxes into the project. Com. Barnes asked why wouldn't the county wait and say they would do the DRI when they reach the 60% . Mr. Thys stated the county is under time constraints to use the current document, if the current document is not going to be useable, then there would not be the need for the FDOT to participate. The Airport Director reviewed the various scenarios. Com. Bruhn asked if in fact the FDOT is letting us deviate from the master plan by letting us do this modified DRI (2010 plan).. Mr. Thys stated, if there is an aviation element still in the DRI, they will continue to participate, as long as that aviation element is there, if it is taken out, then there is no need for the FDOT to participate in the project. Com. Hutchinson asked if there was a time frame for the airport to be built out. Mr. Thys stated ,there was no time frame that said this airport has to be developed in the next 20 years to it's ultimate built out, the agency would not participate with state_ aviation dollars on facilities that weren't merited by capacity. ----- r- Com. Coward stated what happens long term is what interests him. In reading the report, even in a very optimistic case, the second parallel runway is needed and staff `s report states that it is consistent with general aviation and that is not a regional jet port. mom. Coward commented on land purchases west of Kings Highway and requested a status report. The Airport Director stated, there was previous Board action to move forward, however, he is not aware at what point it stands today, it was not part of the recommendation to be included in the DRI. Com. Coward asked the Board to take a position as to whether or not they would like to pursue additional land purchases, particularly west of Kings Highway, which he feels is not an intelligent thing to do at this point . He would like to clarify this tonight. Com. Coward asked why we are pursuing additional land purchases, for example parce124 and 59A, he feels they have purchased enough land at this time. The Airport Director addressed Com. Cowards' questions regarding parce124 and 59A and also the 108 acres of industrial as presented by staff in table 1 of the business plan. He stated he was not sure where the 108 acres came from. Com. Coward stated he would like to find some way for the FDOT to help the county to get out of the mess and this Board not be held accountable for prior Board's decisions. He asked if there were additional steps that could be taken to address the long term product that as a commission they may not want to see. Mr. Thys stated, as it stands, the only remedy would be to reimburse the FDOT for land purchases. At this point, this was created by Florida Statute and this is why they participated and if this Board decides to go in a different direction, then they would expect full reimbursement and this is by Florida Statute. Com. Coward asked if the FDOT has done anything in pursuing legislative action to assist the county as they previously stated in a letter to Mr. Curtis. Mr. Thys stated, this would be up to the county to pursue legislative action to forgive those loans. Mr. Thys reiterated that, there is nothing saying that the State of Florida is forcing you to develop a facility that is not needed. The FDOT participated in a certain amount of property and if the county would decide to go in the direction that is contrary to the master plan that was used to purchase the property, the state would then expect reimbursement for their participation. Com. Lewis stated that when a grant is taken there are requirements and the fact remains the grant money has been used and those monies were for the purpose of building an airport as Mr. Thys stated. Looking at the figures, she stated she feels it may not even go as far as needing the second runway. Com. Barnes questioned if the FDOT funded expansion, improvements, and modernization of general aviation airports or do they strictly fund commercial regional jet ports. Mr. Thys replied, the grant program is available to all public service, publicly owned airports. Com. Barnes asked why would the FDOT not continue to fund the county if they modernized, expanded or improved our general aviation airport but would continue to fund general aviation airports around the state. -., • ` , - _ ;: Mr. Thys replied, the county is not being excluded from anything, all the agency is saying is that the county had an agreement with the FDOT to purchase a certain amount of property for a particular development of the airport, and if the county decides they don't want to develop for those purposes, then the State of Florida would expect their money back. Mr. Thys stated, these agreements were made to develop the airport in this particular manner, and, if the county is not going to do thin, then they would expect their money back and from a Florida Aviation Planning point, and from the State of Florida stand point, this airport is still identified to serve the need for this region. Com. Lewis stated, a grant agreement was signed for aviation funds for aviation development and if we do not want this, then it is up to the county to find a way out of it. Com. Barnes stated he believed the community does not want this airport to be anything more than a general aviation airport. Com. Hutchinson replied, this is a contract and it needs to be look at as such, they have honored their end and we have not shown good faith in this. It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recommendation; Com. Coward requested discussion on the additional land he felt was not needed before placing his vote. Com. Coward stated there are additional lands that he felt are not related to the expansion that is listed and should not be included either east or west of Kings Highway. Com. Lewis requested he note the specific parcels. Com. Coward stated, pazce124 and 59A. Com. Hutchinson asked Mr. Thys if this would jeopardize the DRI . Mr. Thys stated he did not believe they have anything to do with the DRI. The Community Development Director advised the Board that the planning of the industrial park to the north has not progressed in such detail that they could say which parcels would be included and which would not. They aze not looking for industrial development on any parcels west of Kings Highway. At this point they are only looking at the southwest and the northern portion. Com. Hutchinson stated she was willing to amend her motion to eliminate parcels 24 and 59A; Mr. Bob Bangert, Holiday Pines resident, addressed the Board in opposition to the expansion of the airport. Mr. Jim Fielding, Mayor of the City of Port St. Lucie, addressed the Board and stated he is here representing the South County. He has heard tonight that the community does not want this airport, he stated he is not sure what community, because the city is looking at it as potential jobs and businesses we can entice to come here in the future and they are also looking at the potential of that airport in the future. Mr. Chazles Pazsons, azea resident, addressed the Boazcl.~in opposition to the expansion . Mr. Bill Hearn, Indrio Road resident, addressed the Boazd regazding a confliction in some correspondence he feels should be addressed. He stated maybe the Board should see legislative assistance on this issue. Mr. Kirk Young, President of the St. Lucie County Realtors Association, addressed the Board in favor of the proposal presented by the Airport Director and stated it was to the benefit of the people of St. Lucie County. Mr. Stix Nixon, Chairman Governmental Affairs, St. Lucie County Association of Realtors, addressed the Board and asked them to release their biases on this matter. He reminded t<te Board that the statistics referenced earlier regarding the touch and go's was due to the 1989-90 recession which turned the airline industry on its end. This recession did not end until 1996. Mr. Nixon questioned the Board's remarks regarding the public not wanting an airport, he stated he did not know what public that was because he knows growth of the airport will lead to jobs and to a better quality of life. He stated he did not want the same thing to happen to St. Lucie County that happened further south, where growth happened so quickly that the airports could not expand and housing was then practically on top of the airport. Com. Coward and Com. Barnes addressed Mr. Nixon's comments Mr. Bob Bangert, area resident suggested an airport citizen committee be formed. Ms. Francis Scott area resident, addressed the Board in opposition to the airport expansion. Mr. John Doran, North Beach Association, addressed the Board in opposition to the Airport growth. Mr. Doug Davis, North Beach resident, addressed the Board and stated he was encouraged to hear that this airport would be driven by demand and feels it would be an asset to our general aviation needs. Com. Bruhn stated he accepted the amendment to the motion; Final Board comments were made regazding this issue. And; upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Barnes; Aye's: Cowazd, Bruhn, Hutchinson, Lewis; motion to approve staff recommendation as amended carried by a vote of 4 to 1. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Barnes to eliminate any purchase of land west of Kings Highway; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. It was the consensus of the Board to direct staff to begin dialogue with the FDOT to attempt to resolve the issues discussed. 7. Resolution No. 99-112- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to approve the resolution urging the United States Congress to reauthorize and fund the National Estuary Program for an additional five years. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 99-112; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. _._ --- BOARD COMMENTS Com. Hutchinson wished Com. Coward, " A HAPPY BIRTHDAY " - Com. Barnes advised the Board and all present that it was also Joe Finnegan's (Personnel) birthday. Both received BIRTHDAY WISHES FROM EVERYONE. There being no further business to be brought before the Boazd, the meeting was adjourned at 9:15 p.m. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court DATE: May 25, 1999 ADDITIONS REGULAR [XX] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Investment for the Future -Ordinance No. 99-21 -Local Option Motor Fuel Tas BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board grant permission to advertise Ordinance No. 99-21 for a public hearing on June 15, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as the item may be heard. COMMISSION ACTION: APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Review and Abnrovals_ County Attorney: ;~ Management & Budget Originating Dept. Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) ~ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. A " l Purchasing: Other: Eff. 5/96 County Administrator '~-/ INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: FROM: C.A. NO. DATE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney 99-696 May 21, 1999 Investment for the Future -Ordinance No. 99-21 -Local Option Motor Fuel Tax -------------------------- -------------------------- BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of draft Ordinance No. 99-21 which, if adopted, would impose an additional three cent (3~J local option motor fuel tax on every gallon of motor fuel sold in the County. The revenues from the tax may only be spent to meet the requirements of the capital improvements element of an adopted comprehensive plan. A list of projects that will be constructed if the Board determines to levy the additional three cent (3~) tax is attached to this memorandum. Approval of the proposed ordinance will require a 4/5 vote. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board grant permission to advertise Ordinance No. 99-21 for a public hearing on June 15, 1999 at 7:00 p. m. or as soon thereafter as the item may be heard. Resp ctfully submitted, ~'~. ~ ~'?; ~,/ Daniel S. Mclrit re County Attorney DSM/caf Attachment fir' `~ ORDINANCE NO. 99-21 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1-19.3 "TAXATION" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, THEREBY AMENDING SECTION 1-19.3-41 TO PROVIDE FOR THE IMPOSITION OF AN ADDITIONAL FIVE CENT ($0.05) LOCAL OPTION MOTOR FUEL TAX UPON EVERY GALLON OF MOTOR FUEL SOLD IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND TAXED UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF CHAPTER 206, FLORIDA STATUTES; FURTHER AMENDING SECTION 1-19.3-43 TO PROVIDE THAT THE TAX IMPOSED BY THIS ORDINANCE SHALL BE EFFECTIVE FROM JANUARY 1, 2000 THROUGH AUGUST 31, 2015; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY, FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE AND DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, ADOPTION AND CODIFICATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie Count, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. This Board has previously adopted the six cent ($0.06) local option motor fuel tax pursuant to Section 336.025(1)(a), Florida Statutes and a two cent ($0.02) local option motor fuel tax pursuant to Section 336.025(1)(b), Florida Statutes. 2. Section 336.025(1)(b), Florida Statutes (1997), authorizes this Board to levy an additional three ($0.03) cent local option motor fuel tax upon every gallon of motor fuel sold in St. Lucie County and taxed under the provisions of Chapter 206, Florida Statutes. 3. The health, safety, and welfare of the residents of St. Lucie County will benefit from the passage of an ordinance authorizing the levy of an additional three cent ($0.03) local option motor fuel tax to fund, in part, necessary transportation expenditures within St. Lucie County. passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. 1 ~/' NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA: PART A. ARTICLE ~V (LOCAL OPTION MOTOR FUEL TAX) OF CHAPTER 1-19.3 (TAXATION) IS HEREBY AMENDED TO READ: Section 1-19.3-41. Levy of Local Option Motor Feel Tax (a) Pursuant to Section 336.025, Florida Statutes (1985) as amended by Senate Bill 313 passed by the 1986 Florida Legislature, a six cent ($0.06) local option motor fuel tax is imposed upon every gallon of motor fuel and special fuel sold in St. Lucie County and taxed under the provisions of Chapter 206, Florida Statutes. (b) Pursuant to Section 336.025(1)(b), Florida Statutes, an additional tare fi~ cent f$6-8-2-} f$0.05) local option motor fuel tax is imposed upon every gallon of motor fuel sold in St. Lucie County and taxed under the provisions of Part 1 of Chapter 206, Florida Statutes. The revenues received from the additional tt~re five cent {x:62} j$0.05,,..j local option motor fuel tax may only be utilized for transportation expenditures needed to meet the requirements of the capital improvements element of an adopted comprehensive plan. For purposes of this paragraph, expenditures for the construction of new roads, or the reconstruction or resurfacing of existing paved roads shall be deemed to increase capacity and such projects shall be included in the capital improvements element of the adopted comprehensive plan. Expenditures for purposes of this paragraph shall not include routine maintenance of roads. passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. 2 fir./ ~/` Section 1-19.3-43. Duration of Tax The four cent ($.04) local option gas tax originally imposed by this article shall be effective from September 1, 1985 through August 31, 1987, both dates inclusive. The six cent ($.06) local option gas tax imposed by this article shall be effective from September 1, 1987 through August 31, 2015, both dates inclusive. The additional two cent ($0.02) local option motor fuel tax imposed by this article shall be effective from January 1, 1998 through August 2015, both dates inclusive. The additional five cent j0 05) local option motor fuel tax imposed by this article shall be effective from January 1 2000 through Auguust 31, 2015. both dates inclusive. PART B. SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART C. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, __. Tallahassee, Florida, 32304. PART D. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE. Bts passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. 3 The County Attorney is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Florida Department of Revenue, 201 Carlton Building, Tallahassee, Florida, 32301. PART E. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effective upon filing with the Office of Secretary of State. PART F. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was by extraordinary vote as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis XX Vice Chairman John D. Bruhn XX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XX Commissioner Doug Coward XX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XX PART G. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section, "article", or other appropriate word and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through G shall __ not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this day of 1999. passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. 4 ~1.rr ~ ATTEST: Deputy Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY BY: Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. 5 Z W Q w J a H V J Q Z O Fa- 0 N Z H 0 W z Z Z tai F- '~.r'" ~ ~ w g S g S J Q S O z o Q a ~ $ g o o ~ ~ o z Q ~ m o g S ~ Q ~ $ Z Q $ g S w ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ c, z ~, Z m 8 g 8 g $ $ $ 7 ~ u, Q ~ S S ap a o o ~ ~ ~ ~ Z Z W > ~ m S B S . Q `~ $ ~ a z ~ j Q 8 $ 5 ~ ,,~ w O ~ s9 fA Q Z f- a U Q ~ ~~..-- W U ~ a O ~ w O ~ ~ ~ o ? Z o W ~ ~ --~ Q a a w ~ ~ Q U ~ O ~ Z ~ a ~ Q W ¢ o F' ~ ~ o w F- O O ~ Z ~ `.r~ ~ g $ S ° $ $ S S S S S S S 8 S J $ $ $ S $ o o o o o ~ o S o ~ ~ g ~ ~, ° g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 Q ~ S o 8 S o o g S S v $ $ g S ~ $ ~ 8 8 ~ g 8 S g Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z 8 8 S S g Z ~ $ S Q N S oo O S S S ~ Sj S 8 N 8 N ~ ~ ~j{ Q ~{{ : Op i9 ~ O iH O tA O t~ O ~A O 64 ~ `p 69 ~ c~0 ~ ~. p d 4 y~ ~S ~ ~ W °-! c~ S g B $ 8 S g °o g $ S S 8 88 0 . ~ ~ 25 " Z5 ~5 ~ ~ ~5 ~ ~ 25 z ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ Z5 ~ 25 ~ ~ ~ g W ~ ~ ~ ~ Z J ~ z o ~ w m "~ z °° + V ~ W Q Q ~ H ~ Z ~ U ~ w rz ~ ~ W V Z ~ W U ~` U O U O Z ~ ~ W U Q Y ~ ~ w Q ~ ~ a p ~] z H g W g a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~- j Q LL ~ a (n ~ ~ z ~W' ~ p Z ? ~ Z ~ W p ~ F - a Q w Z Z ~ ~ ~ W Z W ~ W C9 ~ ~ ~ Z Z ~ a ~ ~ em U u. >' U Q Q F- O a ~ J U ~ Q ~ Q - ~ a. t=- C9 V ,~ ~ ~ Q tW ~ ~ ~ z C7 ~ ~ ~ Q Q Q Z m g Q ~ ~ a a Y m ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ ~ ~ ° W W ~ W J ~ Z OW F= w Qz $zo gQ ~ Q b ~ ~z w$ w~ Z ~ C7 ~ D J ~ W >O > ~ 2 a~ ~O ~~ *Q M a AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. DATE: May 2 5, 1999 ADDITIONS REGULAR [XX] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Public Transportation Municipal Service Taring Unit (MSTU) BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board grant permission to advertise Resolution No. 99-115, as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: [~/~APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: date of public hearing will be June „v 22 Amend the language in the Doug as nderson resolution. County Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Originating Dept. Or_her: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Purchasing: Other: Eff. 5/96 INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: FROM: C.A. NO. DATE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney 99-694 May 20, 1999 l~t~ `~ Public Transportation Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) BACKGROUND: Attached to this memorandum is a copy of Resolution No. 99-114 which, if adopted, would create a Public Transportation Municipal Service Taxing Unit (MSTU) in the unincorporated area of the County. The purpose of the MSTU would be to fund a portion of the functions of the County's Public Works Department to provide public transportation services in the unincorporated area of the County and other functions as the Board may determine to add. The creation of the Unit does not involve a decision on whether to levy a millage. The decision as to whether to levy a millage or what amount of millage would be made during the normal budgetary process. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board grant permission to advertise Resolution No. 99-114 as drafted. Respe~tfuUy submitted, ~~ ~ ; ~- ~~ Daniel S. Mclntyr,~ County Attorney` DSM/caf RESOLUTION NO. 99-115 A RESOLUTION TO BE KNOWN AS THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT RESOLUTION; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS AND FINDINGS; CREATING THE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT; AUTHORIZING SUCH UNIT TO ANNUALLY LEVY AD VALOREM TAXES; AUTHORIZING OTHER GENERAL POWERS OF SUCH UNIT; DECLARING THE EXCLUSION FROM THE ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, THAT: ARTICLE I INTRODUCTION SECTION 1.01. DEFINITIONS. When used in this Resolution, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly requires otherwise: "Board" shall mean the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida. "County" shall mean St. Lucie County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida. "Public Transportation" shall include public transportation construction, operation and maintenance, bikepath/sidewalk construction and maintenance, roadway and right-of- way construction, drainage, street lighting, traffic signs, traffic engineering, signalization pavement markings, bridge construction, maintenance and operation and other essential transportation and municipal services. "Unit" shall mean the Public Transportation Municipal Service Taxing Unit as created by Section 2.01. SECTION 1.02. FINDINGS. It is hereby ascertained, determined and declared that: (A) Pursuant to Article VIII, Section 1 of the Florida Constitution, and Sections -- 125.01 and 125.66, Florida Statutes, the Board has all powers of local self-government to perform county functions and to render services in a manner not inconsistent with general law and such power may be exercised by the enactment of county ordinances. (B) Section 125.01(1)(c~, Florida Statutes, provides specific legislative authorization for counties to establish a municipal service taxing unit for any part or all of the unincorporated areas within its boundaries, within which may be provided community development and other essential improvements and municipal services. -1- (C) The purpose of this Resolution is to create the Public Transportation Municipal Service Taxing Unit for the purpose of providing public transportation and other essential facilities and municipal services within the unit. The Board determines that the creation of this municipal service taxing unit will be of benefit to the real and personal property within the unit. The Board shall determine each year the estimated cost of providing such services for the ensuing County fiscal year within the boundaries of the unit. (D) The Board hereby determines that the providing of public transportation and such other functions are municipal services within the meaning of Article VII, Section 9 of the Florida Constitution and Section 12 5.01(1) (a), Florida Statutes. ARTICLE II PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION MUDTICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT SECTION 2.01. CREATION. There is hereby created the Public Transportation Municipal Service Taxing Unit pursuant to authority of Section 125.01(1)(c~, Florida Statutes. The boundaries of the Unit shall include the unincorporated areas of the County as indicated in the boundaries set forth and described in the Appendix, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The purpose of the Unit is to provide and facilitate public transportation within the Unit. The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County shall be the Governing Board of the Unit. SECTION 2.02. GOVERNING BOARD POWERS. The Governing Board shall have the power to: (A) Levy annually an ad valorem tax upon taxable real and personal property within the Unit in the same manner as other county ad valorem taxes are levied for the purposes of providing public transportation within the Unit. (B) Adopt a budget at the same time and in the same manner as the Board prepares and adopts its annual county budget and levies ad valorem taxes as provided by law. (C) Separately maintain in a separate account the funds obtained from the levy of the tax. Those funds obtained from the levy of ad valorem taxes shall be used solely for the purpose of providing public transportation services within the boundaries of the Unit. (D) Appropriate and expend revenue of the Unit. (E) Contract to receive and expend money and generally to perform all other acts necessary or incidental to the powers and duties granted by this Resolution. ARTICLE III MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS SECTION 3.01. DECLARATION OF EXCLUSION FROM ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT. Nothing contained in this Resolution shall be construed or interpreted to include the Public Transportation Municipal Service Taxing Unit in the definition of -2- `~.i/ agency contained in Section 120.52, Florida Statutes, or to otherwise subject the Public Transportation Municipal Service Taxing Unit to the application of the Administrative Procedures Act, Chapter 120, Florida Statutes. This declaration of intent and exclusion shall apply to all proceedings taken as a result of or pursuant to this Resolution. SECTION 3.02. SEVERABILITY. If any clause, section or provision of this Resolution shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason or cause, the remaining portion of said Resolution shall be in full force and effect and be valid as if such invalid portion thereof had not been incorporated herein. SECTION 3.03. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be effective on adoption. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution and notice of election was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis XX Vice Chairman John D. Bruhn XX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XX Commissioner Doug Coward XX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this day of May, 1999. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney -3- ~.n APPENDIX A `r.rl'` BOUNDARIES OF THE PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT Unincorporated area of St. Lucie County -4- AG]3NDA REQIISST ITEM NO. i DATE: May 25, 1999 CONSENT [ ] REGULAR [ X ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ l Quasi-JD. [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRES~ ED ~ G~~~G..s SUBMITTED BY: Community Development a ommunity Dev. Director SUBJECT: Consider request for approval of the Local Sponsorship for the Proposed 1999 Florida Department of Transportation's Transportation Enhancement Applications in the Unincorporated Areas of St. Lucie County. BACKGROUND: The St. Lucie Metropolitan Planning Organization is in the process of reviewing applications for the next FDOT Transportation Enhancement Program funding cycle. Funding through this program cycle will be available beginning in July 2002. The MPO has been advised that a total of $400,000 will be available to the entire County as part of the program cycle. Applications for this round of enhancement funding were distributed in March 1999. All applications were due back to the MPO by May 1, 1999. All completed enhancement applications are to be submitted to the Florida Department of Transportation no later that June 1, 1999. Each of the submitted applications must be sponsored by a unit of local government in the County. This sponsorship is required for the purpose of assuring the Department of Transportation that there is sufficient local support to assure the long term maintenance of the enhancement project, if the project is not located on the state highway system. Private community interest groups cannot act as project sponsors. The three proposed projects located in the unincorporated part of the County, including the ones submitted by the two private community interest groups are: PROJECT FROM/TO PROJECT TYPE PROJECT SUBMITTED BY North A-1-A Little Jim Bridge to Landscaping North Beach Homeowners the Pepper Park Assoc. Spanish Lakes Indrio Road to Sidewalk/Bike Path Spanish Lakes Fairways Boulevard Spanish Lakes Property Owners Fairways Association Airoso Boulevard South 25`" Street (St. Landscaping St. Lucie County James) to Prima Vista Blvd. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to sign the sponsor certification on the recommended Transportation Enhancement applications and direct that the MPO staff forward them to the FDOT for final processing. COM SSION ACTION: CONC NCE: [i APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ~ ~ , ~~ ~(s M. AndersoH y Administrator County Attorney: Originating Dept: Finance: (copies only): Coordination/Signatures Mgt & Budget: Other: Purchasing: (AGEND430) Other: COMMISSION REVIEW: May 25, 1999 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ~~ TO: Boa d of Cou~y Commissioners FROM: Ju ' ewchuk, Community Development Director DATE: May 19,1999 SUBJECT: Request for approval of the Local Sponsorship for the Proposed 1999 Florida Department of Transportation's Transportation Enhancement Applications in the Unincorporated Areas of St. Lucie County. The St. Lucie Metropolitan Planning Organization is in the process of reviewing applications for the next FDOT Transportation Enhancement Program funding cycle. Funding through this program cycle will be available beginning in July 2002. The MPO has been advised that a total of $400,000 will be available to the entire County as part of the program cycle. Applications for this round of enhancement funding were distributed in March 1999. All applications were due back to the MPO by May 1,1999. Thus far, the MPO has received five (5) applications from the City of Port St. Lucie one from St. Lucie County and two from private community interest groups in the unincorporated part of the County. Each of the submitted applications must be sponsored by a unit of local government in the County. This sponsorship is required for the purpose of assuring the Department of Transportation that there is sufficient local support and to assure the long term maintenance of the enhancement project, if the project is not located on the state highway system. Private community interest groups cannot act as project sponsors. All completed enhancement applications are to be submitted to the Florida Department of Transportation no later that June 1,1999. In July, the FDOT will return to the MPO those applications that are determined to be eligible for participation in the Transportation Enhancement Program. Following this notification, the MPO is to rank those qualified projects in a priority order and notify the FDOT so that they can complete the final programming of these projects. As we have noted above, the funds for these projects would not become available until State Fiscal Year 2002/2003. The three proposed projects located in the unincorporated part of the Cunty, including the ones submitted by the two private community interest groups are: ~,,. ~/ May 19, 1999 Page 2 Subject: 1999 MPO Enhancement Applications PROJECT FROM/I'O PROJECT TYPE PROJECT SUBMITTED BY North A-1-A Little Jim Bridge to the Landscaping North Beach Homeowners Assoc. Pepper Park Spanish Lakes Boulevard Indrio Road to Spanish Sidewalk/Bike Spanish Lakes Fairways Lakes Fairways Path Property Owners Association Airoso Boulevard South 25`~ Street (St. Landscaping St. Lucie County James) to Prima Vista Blvd. A general description of these projects is as follows: North Hutchinson Island - A-1-A Roadside Plantings: o The proposed project, submitted by the North Beach Association of St. Lucie County, Inc., proposes to provide for the planting of new landscaping from the east end of the Little Jim Bridge to the area of Pepper Park. The proposers are requesting that the FDOT fund this landscaping as an enhancement to the recently completed roadway resurfacing project. The intention of this project is to create a scenic vista along the SR A-1-A right-of--way through St. Lucie County. o No additional right-of--way is expected to be required for this project. All tree plantings are proposed to be located in the existing SR A-1-A right-of--way. o The applicants propose that contract administration for this project would be the responsibility of St. Lucie County. St. Lucie County would be responsible for the maintenance of all plantings once the warranty periods have expired. The North Beach Association would solicit the cooperation of all adjacent property owners in maintaining any landscape plantings adjacent to their property. o The project proposes to include irrigation, to be supplied from the County's reclaimed water production facility on North Hutchinson Island. o Estimated Project Costs: planning $ 10,000 design $ 25,000 inspection: $ 25,000 construction $ 450,000 contingency: $ 0 May 19, 1999 Page 3 Total Requested: $ 510,000 Local Match Funds Required: $ 0 .~„ Subject: 1999 MPO Enhancement Applications o Estimated annual maintenance cost: approximately $ 40,000 (assume $20,000/mile @ 2 miles project length) Action Requested: o Board of County Commissioners agree to be the sponsoring agency for the submission, construction and future maintenance of this enhancement project. Local funding sources for this project can be further refined between now and the requested funding year, July 2002 _ _ Spanish Lakes Boulevard Bicycle/Pedestrian Enhancement: o The proposed project involves the construction of a six foot wide sidewalk along one side of Spanish Lakes Boulevard, between Indrio Road and the Spanish Lakes Fairways Development site. The project length is approximately 1 1/4 mile. Spanish Lakes Boulevard is classified as a local street and is not eligible for any local impact fee expenditures for these bike/pedestrian facilities. Local matching funds would have to be provided through the County's General Transportation Revenues. o No additional right-of--way is anticipated to be needed for this project. o The project is proposed to be designed, constructed and inspected FDOT. o Estimated Project Costs: design: $ 15,000 inspection: $ 10,000 construction $ 110,000 contingency: $ 20,000 Total Requested: $ 155,000 Local Match Funds Required: $ 0 o Estimated annual maintenance cost: $ 500 The annual maintenance of this pedestrian enhancement would be the responsibility of the St. Lucie County Public Works Department, Road and Bridge Division. May 19, 1999 Page 4 Action Requested: .~, Subject: 1999 MPO Enhancement Applications o Board of County Commissioners agree to be the sponsoring agency for the submission. Local funding sources for this project can be further refined between now and the requested funding year, July 2002 Airoso Boulevard -Landscape Enhancement: o The proposed project, submitted by St. lucie County is for the landscaping of the soon to be completed median along Airoso Boulevard from Prima Vista Boulevard to South 25th Street (St. James Drive). This application would be for the cost of final landscaping designs, the cost of providing for planting materials, and for the costs of completing all necessary irrigation systems. o No additional right-of--way is required for this project. o The project anticipates the installation of an automatic irrigation system. o Estimated Project Costs: planning: $ 0 design: $ 15,000 inspection: $ 15,000 construction: $100,000 contingency: $ 13,000 Total Requested: $143,000 _ Local Match Funds Required: $ 0 o Estimated annual maintenance cost: approximately $30,000 (assume $20,000/mile @ 1.5 miles project length) Action Requested: o Board of County Commissioners agree to be the sponsoring agency for the submission. Local funding sources for this project can be further refined between now and the requested funding year, July 2002 STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: ~ ~~ May 19, 1999 Subject: 1999 MPO Enhancement Applications Page 5 _ In reviewing the above applications, staff recommends that Board of County Commissioners agree to provide sponsorship for the following Transportation Enhancement projects: a. North A-1-A Landscaping b. Spansih Lakes Boulevard Sidewalk/Bike Path c. Airoso Boulevard Landscaping Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to sign the sponsor certification on the recommended Transportation Enhancement applications and direct that the MPO staff forward them to the FDOT for final processing. I f you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMITTED: Juli hewchuk Community Development Director JS/ ENHANCEI(a63) cc: County Administrator Asst. County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director Leisure Services Director County Engineer Planning Manager MPO Supervisor ~'~ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 5 DATE: Mav 25, 1999 REGULAR: (X ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: ( ) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS - ADMIN PRESENTED BY: SUBJECT: Review of Tipping Fees for Construction and Demolition debris at the St. Lucie County Landfill. BACKGROUND: On January 12, 1999, the BOCC passed Resolution 99-33, reducing the tipping fee for construction and demolition from $30/ton to $20/ton. On February 9, 1999, the BOCC reviewed the rate and returned the tipping fee to $30/ton and instructed Staff to look at costs and document the actual rate for a review in 30 days. It was the Board's recommendation to hire a consultant, other than CDM, and to get input from the City of Port St. Lucie as well. On March 9, 1999, the Board directed Staff to conduct a meeting with parties affected by a tipping fee adjustment. On March 11, 1999 a meeting was conducted with affected parties. On May 5, 1999 CDM provided an additional analysis of Tipping Fees. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: Discussed on January 12, 1999, and February 9, 1999, and March 9, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners change the construction and demolition debris tipping fee from $30 to $21, at the Glades Road Landfill. COMAAISSION ACTION: APPROVED O DENIED O OTHER: set the rate rate after 6 June 1, 1999. ^ County Attorney: at $24 and re-visit the months. Effective Review and Approvals ^ Management and Budget: `~rr~" CONC ENCE: f u as Anderson County Administrator ^ Purchasing: ^ Originating Dept: (Pub. Wks.l ^ Other:_(Landfilt) ^ Other: ^ Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Ray Wazny, Public Works Director ,~~~t~ ~ SUBJECT: Construction and Demolition Tipping Fees DATE: May 17, 1999 On January 12, 1999, the BOCC passed Resolution 99-33, reducing the tipping fee for construction and demolition from $30/ton to $20/ton. On February 9, 1999, the BOCC reviewed the rate and returned the tipping fee to $30/ton and instructed Staff to look at costs and document the actual rate for a review in 30 days. It was the Board's recommendation to hire a consultant, other than CDM, and to get input from the City of Port St. Lucie as well. On March 9, 1999, the Board directed Staff to conduct a meeting with parties affected by a tipping fee adjustment. On March 11, 1999 a meeting was conducted with affected parties. On May 5, 1999 CDM provided an additional analysis of Tipping Fees. Attached are the following documents: • A copy of Timothy F. Hunt, Jr. & Associates report on C&D tipping fees. • Minutes of the March 11, 1999 meeting with parties affected by tipping fees. • A copy of the March 16, 19991etter from CDM concerning C&D tipping fees. • The May 5, 1999 analyses of tipping fees provided by CDM. f • A copy of the .May 3, 1999 letter from Ron Roberts correcting the tonnage report provided on February 3, 1999. ~ ~ i Based upon the information provided, staff recommends that the Construction and Tipping Fees be changed from $30 to $21 per ton. At $21 per ton, this will facilitate the installation of a recycle system and should increase the rate of recycled C&D materials to over 50%. Please call 462-1485 if you have any questions. RLW/sm cc: St. Lucie County Administrator Solid Waste Manager Attorney for City of Port St. Lucie East Coast Recycling South Florida Recycling Mar 03 99 10:05a Timothy Hunt . `r~` Timothy F. Hunt Jr. ~ Associates '-?58-6378 p.2 ;401 CI irdesdal a Av enue V4'elling?on, Florida 33414 Mr. Leo .i. Cordeiro Solid Waste Manager St. Lucie Couirtv 6120 Glades Cut-offRoad Ft. Pierce, Florida 34981 yi~ore (Sfi1) 708378 Fax (561) 79i;-6443 E-mail ~jrl~juro.com March 2, 1999 Sub,}ect: Report of Findings of'Third Party Review of Cad for Processing for Recovery and Disposal of Construction and Demolition Debris at the St. Lucie County Landfill Dear Mr. Cordeiro: The scope of this report is to provide an independent evaluarion of the cost of processing far recovery and disposal of construction and demolition debris (C & D) at the St. Lucie County Landfill, assess the amount of material recovered or recycled from C ~ D materials received and review the landfill capacity utilized at different tonnage rates. In accordance with your letter of authorization to proceed we used 1 SO tons per day (TPD) for 3I3 days ger year as the comparative bates of our review. Inherent in such an evaluation is consideration of several factors which directly or indirectly impact on the cost of operations. Examples of these factors include: * tomoage by types of materials received, * quantities of segregated versus mixed material received, * revenues by type of material received, * capacity of disposal space available versus consumed; * cast of processing versus disposal of C & D material, and * comparison of costs for processing and disposal of C & D material with similar activities elsewhere. Based upon a review of the minutes from the February 9, 1999 Board of County Commissioners meeting, as they relate to our scope, the following three questions are addressed: 1. Is the county recycling 35% ofthe incoming material classified as C & D~ material received at the landfill? 2. Is the proposed rate of $20 per ton for C 8t D material sufficient to pay for the reported recovery rates and disposal? 3. How much capacity of the C & D landfill space will be depleted if the counr~ receives appro~cunately 150 tons per day (TPD j? "iar O~ 59 10:05a ~mothy Hunt 5~ ?98-6378 p,3 . r11rr~ Our findings are summarized below vt~th the details of our report contained in the attachment supported by appropriate e~:hibits• We have also included recommendations which may be of assistance to St. Lucie County. ~tmrnary of ~iudin~s 1. Based upon research of scale tickets by county landfill staff, our experience and independent research it appears that probably 35% of materials classified as C 8i D were recovered in 1998. However, it is difficult to deternnne, without extensive additional effort, how much of the recovered material was actually recycled or reused from inventory especially within landfill operations. We estimate 28% was delivered already segregated and ?% required sorting. 2. Based upon a review of county and other documents and comparison with other similar operations ow opinion of C & D recovery and disposal costs are as follows: Cost Per Ton TPD Coun CDM T. Hunt `; 100 ~ X15.47 $16.89 ~ $1.6.33 i $11.40 ~ 150 - __ ' Notes: (a) The County and CDM calculations are based only on 100 TPD, 30 years of long term care, some double counting ofpersornel, and different years of landfill capacity used. (b) T. Hunt prepared calculations for 100 and 150 TPD, used FDEP requirements for S years oflong term care for C ~& D Landfills, included some double counting ofpersonnel, used actual projected landfiIl capacity used. (c) T. Htmt used the 7.5% for allocation of expenses for comparative purposes however, v~ do not feel comfortable with this percentage as it does not appear to be tied to a measurable index. Therefore, as an example we chose to use C & D tons as a percentage of gross tons received to establish a measurable index and recalculate projected costs which are discussed in the attachment and presented in Exhibit V b. 3. Calculati f landfill depletion prepared by the County and CDM used 13001bs per cubic ya and d C ~ D generation rates from their 1997 Landfill Finaneial update wht~S,liusbd.-4.0,38 projected tons (129TPD) for 1998. T. Hunt used 1400 lbs per cubic ,~,-~-~ yard based~on E ~snote ofrecommendation in their 1997 update and calculated ~ d letion based upon 100 and 1 SO TPD resu}ting ' llowiag comparison: ~ ~ J p ~ ~ ~ T. Hun TPD County i CDM --~ 100 2049 j 2024 _ 2031= None of the depletion projections consider C & D recovery or recycling rates. Any materials recovered and not di~pased extends landfill life into the future. ~~ 2 ,Mar p3 99 10:05a Timothy Hunt i ~-798-6378 P.q There are many factors invotved in developing our findings for each gaestion. The details of our report is presented in the Attachment and Exhibits. We will be available to present our report to the Board of County Commissioners on itiiarch 9, 1999 Submitted by, ~~ Timothy F. Hunt Jr. Principal Attachment wl exhibits Mar U3 99 lU: USa Timotl-iy Hunt . ~~ AttachmeQt 5 -798-6378 p.5 ,r~- Details of Costs R. Recovery Rates of C & D Materials at St. Lucie County Landfill Background In a January 9, 1998 letter Camp, Dresser & McKee, lnc. (CDM} estimated a gross revenue reduction from landfill tipping of $ 1.1 million on an annualized basis if tipping fees were adjusted as follows: Class I: From $35.00 per ton to $30.00 per ton (current rate is $32.00 per ton) C & D: From $30.00 per ton to 520.00 per ton Yard Waste: From $26.00 per ton to 520.00 per ton The Board approved the Class I and Yard Waste reduction but not the C & D reduction. In a staff memorandum to the Board, dated March 24, 1998, C & D toxmage for the past year was ,_= -_ estimated at-34,000 tons.or approauma~e1j-108 tons perday ~ This toimage generated approanriiately $1.02 mc~lion per year at $30.00 pe ton. The staff estimated that a reduction in tipping fee far C & D waste from $30.00 per ton to $18.00 per ton would result in approximately $400,000 Less revenue per year. 'The memorandum implied that if waste flow to the landfill was not protected from competitors (which were charging from $19.00 to $27.00 per ton) the abfiity of making principal and imerest (P & I) escrow payments may have to be subsidized by taxpayer. A reduction of the C & D tipping fee to $18A0 per ton combined with approved reductions for Class I and yard waste would allow for an escrow into the Future Landfill Expansion Account of one m~7lion dollars per year. These statements appear contradictory unless aan increase in waste tonnage were to occur. On January 12, 1999 the Board approved a reduction of the C & D rate from $30 to $20 per ton to be effective February 1,1999. Staff and CDM documentation in support of the rate reduction showed a cost range of $15.47 to $16.94 per ton, 25 to 50 years oflandSll capacity, a crew of three employees (presumably for sorting} calculated on 100 tons per day (TPD) of C & D received. Neither cost analysis includes debt service or land cost nor does either discuss quantities to be recovered from the C & D waste stream Different assumptions were used by CDM and Division staff with respect to landfill capacity depletion and the number of employees needed far sorting (halfversus full time). Research We reviewed the following documents; minutes ofthe February 9, 1999 Board meeting, documents provided by bor. Cordeiro and his staff county landfill operarions, and county landfill permit files, spoke with Mr. Kreiser and Mr. McNamara, and with Mr. Joe Lurix of the Florida Department of Emvironmeatal Protection and researched information from other C & D operations in developing our evaluation ofthe county C &. D cost of operations, recovery rates and capacity depletion. ,Mar 0~3 99 10:06a Timothy Hunt ~ -798-6378 p.6 '~ ('inrifratinn t-f TerminoloEy We noted the use oFseveral terms or definitions throughout discussions ofthe C & D topic at the Board meeting and in staff documents that could be confusing or misleading if not understood or used in the proper conte~rt. Therefore, the following are provided for a better understanding of the issues Construction & Demolition Debris: includes steel, glass, brick, concrete, asphalt material, pipe, gypsum wallboard, lumber; rocks, soils, tree remains and trees from land clearing, clean cardboard, paper, plastics, wood and metal scraps.(These are materials generated from construction or demolition projects and usually are delivered in mixed loads although segregated items are ofteo delivered to a landfill). * Recycling: is any process by which materials are collected, separated, or processed and reused or returned to use as raw materials or products. * Recovered Materials: includes materials that have known recycling potential, can be feasibly recycled and have been diverted, or source separated or have been removed from the solid waste stream for sale, use or reuse. * Yard Trash: means vegetative matter resulting from landscaging maintenance and land clearing operations. We w~71 address each c}uestion separately in this section 1. Division of Solid Waste recently stated that they recycled 35% of the C & D material received at the landfill iii 1998. The attached Exbubits I and II (1998 Tonnage Report and 1998 C & D Recycling Report} are charts prepared by Division staff showing types and quantities of C 8c D materials recovered and total materials received, disposed and recycled for 1998. Exhibit )~ prepared by the Division explains their cotapdation of C & D recovery efforts. It is unclear when this information was generated as it did not appear in the 1998 Grant Application, or from what source documents although Exhibit IIl references scale reports and sale receipts. Note that there is a 3,789 ton difference in total tons between Exhibits II and IlI in reported tans recycled. This is probably an inventory {recovered not yet recycled) recording and tracking problem which is the basis for one of our recommendations. We have used the 7120 tons referenced in E~dubit II for our calculations. Although, our scope does not include a detaded audit of these reports to verify reported quamities some observations can be made; '~ 'There has been no C & D recycling at the St. Lucie County Landfill reported to FDEP for several years~including 1998 (See Grant Applications), * There is no mention of any recycling efforts at the landfill itt the Operating Permit renewal documents submitted in July 1998 and approved by FDEP in September 1998, except for yard waste, * The Solid Waste Division organizational chart (Exh~it IV) in the Operating Permit renewal document does not include any sorters for recycling, Mar ©3 99 10:06a ~imothy Hunt -?98-6378 .~ ~ p . 7 As there are no historical landfill recycling reports; it can not be determined, w7th accuracy, how much recovered material was in `5nventory" awaiting sale or reuse thereby clouding any accurate assessment of when and how much material was recovered and reused or recycled in 1998. It has been a long standing practice of all landfill operators to set aside any incoming material felt to be of potential operational reuse such as dirt, rock, brick, concrete, utility poles, etc., therefore recovery and reuse are usually common and ongoiag practices (see Exhibit III), Most landfills have been setting appliances aside for resale as scrap metal for decades. These are mixed with oilier recovered metals thus confusing how much metal has been recovered from incoming C & D material Appliances represent the largest component of recovered steel, by weight, and they typically are received already segregated or are mechanically segregated by a loader and appliances are not classified as C & D material, The landfill has certain customers that bring in segregated loads of materials that would be classified as C & D which require no sorting or processing. The customers include other county departments and utilities which bring in large quantities of sods, broken concrete and asphak, old fencing, utility poles and wheel stops. Private C & D recyclers typically do not receive these lids of segregated loads, Rock, concrete and land clearing {presumably inchiding soil) materials represents approximately 28% ofthe reported 35% of C & D recovered, the majority of which does not require much, if any, sorting. The remaining ?% is wood (htmber) and constntctioa metal which requires minimal sorting. 2. The Division requested a rate reduction from $30.00 to $18.00 per ton in March 1998 and fiom $30.00 to $20.00 is January 1999. Reasons for the $2.00 per ton difference were not mentioned m any of the documents reviewed. However, the only specific reason given for recommending a reduction in the C & D rates in March 1998 was to protect waste flow: The proposed C & D rate of$18.00 would compare to rates charged at the Okccchabcc landfiII for C & D material where no sorting occurs. The statewide average rate for C & D disposal at county landfills was $31.35 per ton in FY 9?-98. Of the 57 county landfills that accepted C & D only 9 charge less than SZO (average of $14.99 per ton) and 13 charge between $20 & $29 per ton (average of 522.98 per ton). County landfills typically do not want C & D material and set their rates to discourage its receipt. The Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County (SWA) calculates a rate of $20.67 per landfilled ton of C & D material However, the SWA receives much larger quantities of C & D material and disposes of it in a lined class 11I landfill. When the SWA was processing C & D material their. costs per tan were as follows: 1994 49,905 tons $27.6? per ton 1995 22,055 tons $34.87 per ton 3 Mar 0~3 99 10: 08a 'moths Hunt 5~ 798-6378 ~o. 8 `~ lfthe one week tonnage received in February 1999 (approximately 150 tons per day) were annualized at $20.00 per ton it would generate an increase in revenue of appro,amately $475,000 offsetting about 509'0 of the lost revenue associated with the March 1998 rate reduction for Class I and yard waste. This revenue gain is the opposite of what was anticipated in the staffmemo of March 1998. Based upon research of scale tickets by county landfill staffit appears that they probably recovered approximately 35 °Yo of materials classi&ed as C & D. However, it is difficult to determine, without e~densive time and resources, how much of the recovered material the Division actually recycled from the C & D waste stream in 1498. Some differences between the landfll and privatz recyclers C & D recovery operations are as follows: * The majority, by weight, of C R. D material recovered by the Division is delivered already source separated requiring little additional processing. Division records (Exhibit IIj show this source separated material probably amounts to about 28% of the reported material recovered (rock, concrete, dirt from land clearing And soil). * With no staff dedicated to sorting incoming tY~ C & D loads only targeted "cherry" pic]ong could be accomplished probably concentrated on lumber and consttuction metals which represented the remaining 79'0 of recovered C & D material This is where the private recycler puts the greatest effort and accounts for most labor ~~- * Due to the quantity of segregated C & D the landfill receives, any directed sorting of mixed loads would only increase the potential recovery rate from the total C & D waste stream Increased sorting w~71 have an increase in operational costs but will reduce landfill air space consumed. Z. The Division during 1998 apparently recovered from an average of 100 tons per day of C & D materiel, approximately 35% without additional cost_ Three sorters were added only during the 9 day period when rates were set at $20 per ton for C & D material. These additional staff{3) were accounted for in calculations prepared by the Division and by CD1Vh, at an aimua! cost of $100,000 and $50,000 respectively. Our calculations of the cost for recovery and disposal of C & D material at the County landfill is presented in Exhibit V a., Comparison of Tip Fee Calculations AS ~m~ng the 7.5% allocation of operating expenses, recogniziig some double counting of personnel in cross utilization of work assignments and using FDEP requirements for 5 years of funding for long term care and maintenance we calculate a rate of $16.33 per ton at 100 TPD and $11.40 per ton at 150 TPD. We do not feel comfortable with the expense allocation of 7.5% as it 4 ,Mar 03 99 10:09a Timothy Hunt ~ -798-6378 p.9 ~~ does not appear to be tied to a measurable index T17erefore, as an exa~le we chose to use 1998 C & D tons ss a percentage of gross toms received to establish a measurable index and recalculate project casts. This results in approxinnately a 12.8°io allocation instead of 7.~%. The comparison is presented in Exhibit V b. and is summarized as follows: 100 TPD (~ 7.5% = $16.33 per ton: ~a. 12.8% _ $21.44 per ton i 50 TPD @ 7.5% _ $11.40 per ton C 12.89'° = 514.80 per ton As shown above, the impact of a change in the allocation formula can be substantial and combined with potential variability in tonnage could create a significant difference between expected and realized revenues. However, our approach may not be the most appropriate for St. Lucie county. it is prpa°r#ed as an exanmrle cn lv. There are several reasons why the county should be able to charge less for C & D processing and disposal than a private recycler that has no on site disposal capacity and these are: * T'hc landfill has co~lete infrastructure and personnel to support a variety of activities which aIlows for effective cross utilization of staff and equipment. A private C & D recyeler is fully conce.~ated on one acaivity and has minimal cross utiliTatia~n potemial * The county landfill does not have the transfer expense fur SO-60% of residue that must be hauled away for disposal by private recyclers The $18 per ton disposal charge at the private landfill includes no processmg and presumably includes overhead 8or taxes and profit. The county does not pay taxes nor is it a for profit entity. As pzeviously mentioned most public landfills do not want C & D material and price it accordingly with the average being $31.35 per ton. More competitive C & D disposal rates have been identified as low as $9 per ton with a reasonable range at about $1 S - $ZO per ton. In a January 9,1998 letter to Mr. Cordeiro, CDM included tables from their FY97 Annual Financial update on the county landfill. Table 3 projects tonnage of Class I and C &D material for 1998 from Port St. Luse and the unincorporated area are 40,380 tons or about 129 tons per day_ Table S includes calculations of C & D landfill capacity utilization using the tonnage from Table 3 noted above. Using CDM's calculation at 129 TPD the C & D landfill capacity wouldbe exhausted by 2024. C & D landfill depletion is calculated using CDM's recommended density of 1400 Ibs per cubic yard and assuming no recovery of C & D material the calculations are presented in (Exlu'bits Vl a and b); and summarized as follows: 100 TPD air space depleted by 2030 150 TPD air space depleted by 2022 Obviously, the fewer tons of material that go into the landfill the longer the capacity will be available. An aggressive C & D recovery and recycling program ti~ould therefore extend the life of the C & D landfill ,Mar .03 99 lO:lOa Timothy Hunt -798-6378 p. 10 .~ w"~ B,€comme~Sla_~iQ~i Based upon our thud party re~~iew of St. Lucie County's C & B recovery and disposak costs we developed some recomrneadationsthut we hope will be of assistance. 1_ The County should adopt an operating expense allocation calculated on a known base such as tonnage that measurably reflects a realistic spread of expenses to internal operations. A sirnikar approach should be taken for any escrow accounts. 2. The County should determine what are to be,ffany, the recycling goals at the county landfiIl by waste type. If adopted these goals would become an element of the countywide program. 3. Once recycling goals are determined develop a )andfill recycling operating plan which should be very specific with respect to recording, tracking and reporting all materials received, recovered and stockpiled, used, or sold at the landffi Close track of value or revenue for all recycled material is important including landfill capacity saved. 4. As part of establishing the recording, tracking and reporting system all inventoried materials irmst be measured and quantified and a method of inventory tracking should be clearly established. 5_ If mixed load C & D materials recovery is to be an operating goal of the landfill evaluate the alternatives aval~able to maximize operational productivity ([bs. recovered per sorting employee per work days. Recovery of this material should be tracked separately from incoming segregated loads. 6. For purposes of understanding and tracking cotr~arative costs for recovery of C & D material the county should consider trackutg both segregated loads versus mixed loads. The county may wish to utilize tipping fees as a means of promoting increased source separation and reduced processing costs. Other courrties have created unique methods of encouraging private recycling while protecting their revenue stream. Examples include a rate for recycling process residue at a competitive disposal cost, another for pure source separated material and a high rate for mixed material that requires sorting. 6 Mar p3 99 10: l0a Timothy Hunt -798-6378 Exhibit I St Lucie County Calendar Ysar 1998 Tonnage Report St Lucie County Land~rt! January 1,1998 -December 31,1998 Tona Landfitied Tons Recycled Totaf Tons Class l MSW 109,231 0 109,231 Yard Waste 0 27,763 27,763 (includes land clearing debris) C ~ D 13,140 ~1~8 20,260 White Goods 0 136 13fi Tires 580 t) 580 (Other) 0 p 0 TOTAL 1?2,951 35,019 157,970 Remaining capacity (in cubic yards) of the Glades Cut Off Road Landfill 11,564,-~~ Number of years of permitted capacity remaining p. 11 N:\W{N\-/V~:T~ppin9 ~eesltonsc~Indr.wpd Revised February 3, 1999 Mar 03 99 10:12a Timo~hy Hunt ~~r+ ~ -798-6378 \.I Exhibit II ST. LUC1E COUNTY LANDFILL MATERIALS RECYCLED OllT OF C & D p. 12 H:`4'Ji N.WF1M15C1CDrecyd•wPd -?98-6378 p. 13 ,Mar Q3 99 lO:lSa ^imothy Hunt E~libit III The tons of recycled C&D materials is derived from the dailylmonthly reports of the Foreman 111 and scale pause tickets. The daily/monthly reports, in the .^,aiumn fitted "Other" reflect loads (20 cubic yards each} of material which are converted to tons by using Caterpillar, inc. assumed weights per cubic yard. top soil 260Q lbs. per cubic yard rock, concrete, asphalt 25001bs. per cubic Yard Metats delivered to the Landfill (pages i-4} are on a scale house report of 1998 and reflects that '136 tons crossed the inbound scale. Records from the St. Lucie County Fnance Department show that 27t) fions of metals were sold. The 134 ton difference in inbound scrap metal and 270 tons sold reflects the tonnage of metals extracted from construction and demolition debris. The remainder is either stock piled (approximately 250 tons) or was used to make litter fences, gates or safety rails, or used as culverts {9.75 tons). Wood (1110 tons} recycled from the landfill (page 5) is wood removed from land dearing debris or posts used for litter fences and placed with yard waste and mulched. This weight is an estimated weight. The material is then used as a fuel for boilers. The Landfill removed 247 yards (308 tons) of rock (bricks, broken cxancrete) from C&D mater'~al at the C&D cell and used it as road base. Also, not listed on the daily/monthly report or the `materials recycled" fist is the concrete recycled in an outfalt structure and as barriers at the waste fire locatron (page 7). Asphalt, concrete, and rock that the Road & Bridge Division brings to the Landfill for disposal as C&D waste is ticketed as fill because the Landfiq uses this material for certain projects such as road construction (page 10). Therefore, this material although recycled does not appear on ttie daily/monthly foreman's report. A11222 scale house tickets for asphalt, rode, and concr~e material diverted from the CS~D cell and recycled as road bases are provided. All 222 (3140 tons) loads of this material were placed on Phase ll of the Landfr~t and used as needed when the working face moved and roads needed to be constructed. Ap of this material has been used and none stock piled. The 224 loads of top soil used for final cover in 1988 (5532 tons) at the St. Lucie County Landfi~ is made from removing rocks, limbs and wood wastes from land clearing material that would otherwise have gone into the CB~D cell. This dirt (page 11j is mired with fines from yard waste and fumed periodically until it is ready for use. All of the material used in 1998 was mixed in 199&. In addition to the above materials being t~ecycled the landfill also used 400 yards (540 tons) of broken asphalt from the destruction of a road as a product for road bases_ The total tonnage of CB~D material recycled in 1998 was '1U,909 tons. Note: Reference pages are photographs Mar 03 99 10:17a Timothy Hunt Solid Waste Superintendent p. 14 Public Worl~ Olre~or Solid Waste Manager Maintenance Worker 1 t`,omp)iancc Techriaan (9} Heavy Equipment Operator A (2} Heavy 6qupment Operamr I Vegetation, C onlroAe r/Maintenance Worker i nspedorl5patter Sen for Accou nGng perk Budget& Revenue Coordinator Foreman IIl Maintenance Supervisor (3) Heavy Equipment Mechanic E" -798-6378 Exhibit I V Office Assstar>x tp OtTice Assistant i Landfill lead Scale Operator Rl ~~ Operator St Lucie County Public Warns Department Solid Waste Division Fiscal Year 1998-1999 r~01A Mar 03 99 10:186 'imothy Hunt COMPAR!$OIV OF CiD F1P FEE CALCt1LAT10NS ST. tUCJi CCUNTlI Remsinfnp CSD CeN Gpsdbr (CYO ImAlace Cvmpsoted Denelty pb PN CY) Air Space AvaQsele In CSC CeN Esllrnated CSD Undlt! Adtw ills (Yesrs) FlNANCIAL t:At.CULATIOIIs Mwn-p9ons DaNy Dslvsitee et CS01Mterir i1Pd~ tro. of Opentlnp ~ D~ Peer Estinwted Annual Cat) ToruleQe (tons} Cl4suM Casts EsUme/M CiD Landis Cbwrs Coats Annual Escrow Rsep~tartleM tar Clown cal psr TtaR lbr Ctslrre LvsO Tens Cw aM Mslstte~tu costa Estltnato tot OM YMr d ~ Ttun+ Can No, of Yeera hr LettO Tos~1t Gin Tots) Cosa bt iety Tenn Csn EseMatsd CSD Lsn4sN uti Cent pe- Ton tar t+M10 Tenn t:en Annusi LsborCeeb No. at El»pleyees Na, of Dallir HatHs Ho. of flperaUew DM Annual Lbor Coal Cost Par Hour per F.tnployee Cest pu TsA tot Labor Annus~ EqulpnterttCoab Esttlnsued Anral Equtpnsnt Costs Cost par Ton ter l~tlipnNM other AnClNlety CSD Qe11 Etcpeeses Annual LendIINToW E~pNMM CAD Etehnsiod NNot:sli0d d E~cpeneee Annual Anelwry trtiD taw Expenses Cos! per Tes for ONter Anf~at- E.xpenees TGtl1~ EiT11fATB0 GOaT DER TON Colt par Ton toe Cwwn cost per Too ter LanO Tern+ Cere Ceat pr Ten liar Leber Cost par Ton tot' ~tlru-enl Cost par Tsn fer OlMet AnRlElsry Expenses TOTAL EsTiMATteD COST PER TON f -798-6378 2,4A3,S62 2,463,'S62 1300 1300 1.814,328 1,614,32! SO 26 ~~ 1ao 313 313 31.soo 51,300 S 1,71S,Z00 S 34,304 ; 1.40 s so,296 s 1,SOB,S90 50 ~ o.ts 3 8 313 i 100.000 S 13.1 : 3.18 = 125,000 ; 1.tN f 2,D97~880 7.5% : 224,620 i 7.11 Exhibit V a ~.1luttr T. MuNT p. 15 2,4e3.592 2,40J.562 1300 1500 1,614,329 1,81 x,326 32 ~ 100 156 3~3 3+s 31,300 46.~so ;1,715,00 f 1,715.200 ; 1,715,200 S 09005 f 31.000 f 74,574 = L19 i 1.71 s t.~l1 S 50.20! f 60.259 ; 50.269 ~ b S S 1,606,580 f 231,450 s 251,43 2S ~ f 1.t+s : o.ts t o.~s 3 3 3 4 9 9 313 913 313 3 b0,000 f 100,000 f 100.000 S 13.51 S 13.11 t 43.31 ; 1.90 ~ 3.111 t 2.13 5 125,000 S 125,000 t 125,000 s s.N f a.vf f 2.90 s 2.997.980 7.b9i f ~z4,a~ i 7.10 f 2,907,680 7.'S% f n4.eze f 7.1! f 2,907,86fl 7.616 s u4,a~t: f ass f 1.10 ; 2.11 = 1,71 f 4.!! _ _ ; 1.0.1 : oss s os~ ; 3.10 : 1.10 f 3.11 i 2.ti ; 3.09 ! 3.l9 f 3.00 f 2A! i 7.19 i T.1• t 7.1! f t~.to = 18.47 S ts.fe i 1i.is TFN i ASSOGUTES ~°J°° C60 OtOdt !'~N*~ht.frk ~ rb ~ Mar ,03 99 10: 186 Timothy Hunt ~r '.-798-6378 Exhibit V b Co+vPAR190N Of Ci~D TtP fEE Cltt CuLA TfONs sr. cvc~e cauNrY p. 16 DL~>1CRiPT1Qi) BTAFF CDiA t. HUNT T. MUN7 CEL A tTY Remalntng C30 GN Cepecily (CYi 2,487,582 2,483,382 2;183,582 2,483,562 !n-Placi CompaoMd a.naay (!b ~.r tr,r} +300 lsao 1300 1300 ~kSpsuAvaliebtofnCbOCatl 1,814,928 t,et4,925 1,014,328 1,$14,328 E911rt~eted G30 L.7u14tA! Nctlw Uh {YN+ra} Sd Zs 32 23 f~iwwcu-~ cu.auu-noN: A9wmptbns ~a{ty aawr+« of Cio Maarlat {tPa~ tio. of Opsrotlnp ~a per Yeot Eatimatad Antwat C8D Tonnage (lane} too 100 100 tso 3t3 313 913 913 31,300 31,300 31,304 46,950 down Cosa Estimalad Cdp Lertdtill Closure Casts S 1,713,200 S 1,715,200 j 1,7iS,200 3 1,T15,244 Mnua! Esc++DW ROquiratAOM IOr Goeurv i 34.304 i 84,000 i 53,600 f 74,574 Celt per 7061 for Gbaun i 1.10 i 2.19 i 1.T1 i 1.59 Lvna T>atm Dan end McMtontn» Coals l:sfimata tot Ons YNr of Long Tenn Care i 50.288 i 50,8 = 50,266 3 50,288 Nv. of Ystn for Long Term Caro 34 ~ 6 5 TataiCodlo-LoapTarenGra 51,508.,580 Si-508,580 S 261,430 : 251,430 Estirnatsd Cd~D LOndINI IJte SO 25 32 Z, Cost p-Tart ha I,ofp Ta+re+ Can i O.ai : 1.ls f 0.25 i O.n Annual LstrorCoala 3 No. of EtnpfoYsaa 3 3 9 No. of Oaily Hours 8 4 8 9 No. of Oporatlttp boys 313 313 31S 313 ~~~ t.abof Cass< f 10A,000 : 50Aoa Z 100,400 s 100,000 Cost pu Hour par ErnpbYoo i 13.11 S 13.11 ! 13.31 S 13.3 t Goat por Ton for Wtor t 3,1! i 1_ti0 ? s.1a f z.1 i Annu:~ Eta~igmaut coca Efematad Aflrtual Eatdpmam Costa i 125,000 = 125.000 S 126.000 i 125,000 CoN par Toe !o- ldulpmoat 3 2.H i ill s 7.0! i 3.10 OtMr AneWMry CaD Cell Expanesa Annual la<taiu Total Expenaea s 2,66r,eeo s 2,08T,8BG i s,o9T,aeo s 2,99TJleu CRD Esttmatsd Agocatbn of ExpanseC 1.3% 7.311 12.Mi 12.8% Mnual MdReq ClD GY Etpans~ S t24,8Z8 S 224,828 i 361,459 S 384,456 Cest par Tort !or 0lhor MdiNory Expooses S T.tf i 7.18 t 12.98 3 a.ta TOTAL ti3TiMATiO CO>1T PpR TON 10 2 i T1 I i 1.50 Coat por TM for Cfattro S 1.10 i . . i 023 Cost par Tsn for Leap Term Can S ~ - S 1.W f 020 Cast par Taw for t.ebor = 3.19 = 1.00 t 3.19 i 2.13 coat per ton fvr Equtpetonl t+ 3.tW 1 3.l9 i ].ft i 2.~ Cent pN Ton for bthx AndlNary Expsnsos i 7.18 f T.1i f 12.28 i X19 TOTAL pBTMiATED CO>il' PER TON i 1 f.4T i 18.09 i 21.41 8 14.60 caa a+..r. e,a+•.r...rw ina r-.. TFt1 6 A81;OC1ATEti ~i°'~ Mar 03 99 10:19a Timothy Hunt ~ '-798-6378 , ~ p. 17 ~~ Exhibit VI a CALGULAT70At OE C4;D C01l. UFE EXprCTANCY ST. LiJC1& COUNTY llttrrm~ Oittt~atlon TPO of: 1501¢d ~y+rytpdpiM: 04e~ky 1.1M 9ound:lcv FY 1018 0lnNry 1,142 poundsacy ,,,,s po~+,d.-cy 1,400 p0undslcy fY 1948 i Futu~ ~~Op{~ 2.420,704 CY WASSTE D1~Ep Ci0 LAlrDFILI V01.1t1oE FliCl1~ COED CB~D DE01tJbNN~s Of YEP-R ~ ~` E0 ~~ NG R6MAI YF~ VOL Fit + Fn RE84AMIMNA fM.1. ~ 1005 998 ~~~ 61.548 4Z,t22 0b,004 348,540 607 2.502,100 310,870 2„540,034 1 1007 37,00? 58,452 380 STO 2.340.034 M5,1ZZ 2.443.502 2 425 47 ~ 714 4 445172 5pZ 00T 2,403.302 302 541,'321 2,531,109 }~ 2000 ,a00 X2,400 4, 48,088 , 647.521 ?,981,183 b93.807 2001 33 198 47,427 343,807 2.35.097 041,034 2,217.870 2pp2 . 34.137 48.787 041,034 1.217.870 4 189.001 107 734 =.~ 1103 797 180 2 2003 35,075 1 50.10$ 447 51 638.80'1 739 007 03 2,231, 2,101.707 . 794.35'1 , . 2,137,3!!0 2004 2QOS 38,0 3 031 38 , 52.787 . 781,354 2.137.330 044,141 2,004.613 2008 , 30,121 58,091 044,141 ?.064.503 ' 001.~72 521 2.029.632 47$178 4 2007 006 40,148 4170 57.35'1 757 54 099.172 f31,5Z6 ?,024. 332 1,972.170 1J0, (,416,203 , 1.912.421 2 2001 ,4g~5T3 . 82,247 1.014203 1,412.421 1,070,529 4 52 i,d50.1TS 35? 786 1 ~0 45,378 64,823 87 263 1.070.624 352 1 143 1,oso.1T5 70!,352 1 1.1 3.3 1210.140 , , 1,718.051 201! ?A12 Q.103 061 41 . 69,845 , , 1,210,846 , 1,710.003 1,2W,490 1,040,!!4 2019 , 736 60 72.47a 1 a6o.490 1.840.214 1,332,900 1.!7x,1!1 2014 . 52,631 75,198 1,35,068 1,37!.738 1.4?b,10a 1,600.037 2010 54,005 78,008 1440.117 1.300,097 1,308.174 1,412.630 01' 1 311 2016 7 30,408 M8 58 80.711 498 81 1.501,174 1,508.006 1.422,630 1.341.011 1,510,110 1.610.313 , . 1.250,521 201 2010 , 60L430 . x.369 1,070,309 1.256.321 1,755.762 ~ 82 ~ 2019 02,629 09,328 1,750,762 4,171,9!? 1.046,071 .Q 45 0 ~ ~ 2020 04893 063 04 94,376 378 92 1.046A71 1,938.468 1.002AZ5 91D.246 1,938,456 2,070.192 , e47,A12 2021 20ZZ , 04.003 . 82,371 2,030.032 00 197.172 49S OOS 2.123,209 21'5 606 2 o05r448 713,110 2023 2024 y4,~3 083 84 92,576 62,378 2,123.2 2,21!,515 . 713.114 , , R,30T5i01 820,743 2023 , 64,g~ 92,376 2.307.00! 620,745 2rW0,330 528,380 400 p~ e4,553 92.376 378 92 2.4o9.J3a 714 492 4 628,380 435.910 2.492x14 2,015A90 x. ZD4T 2020 14,613 14,663 . !2.578 . . 2 jf11,C90 343.114 2 b77,16T 211,217 x81 158 ~p 64,883 92.378 376 2 2!177,417 709 043 2 251.237 811 150 2,7,843 2,M2,Z20 . 81,184 2030 2031 04,g~ 64,606 . 9 92 378 . . 2,00220 . 01.434 2.664.5Qb r~,392 211 110 paz 64,663 92.376 378 92 2,954,698 472 046 3 •zsA12 -110,280 3.040,572 3.139,741 , - -210J045 2033 20x4 04,003 61,163 . 92378 . . 3,139.344 -210.845 3.Z31.72'S 2 ->a3.0~21 390 -31"5 20~ 84,863 92.378 3.731.725 •303.021 3,324,10 , ~e.i TFH k AS10CfAT1rCS sus cc~ ~. F,wn.o...an i sso apw~en ,Mar Q3 99 10:21a "imoth~ Aunt ,~ -798-6378 Exhibit VI b CALClltATloN OF Ct0 CEIt t1fL EzrECrANCY ar. ~uct~ COUN7Y Assuatf~- OoRSrstlon rP8 oh. 1301pd Apumptlons: aM+~itY 1,111 pewndNcy FY 1993 OwtsltY 1,542 poundtky FYt411 Ownsltp 1,x71 Pa+~ry FY 1917 WnaMY 1x100 pound9lry FV 10N a Futura CRpadey 2.921,704 ct- tnrwaze atsros><0 can u-~nFiu vo4urte >ascA~ can rao sar,~Na+G oR ~ sNO of ~e 11fiAR TONNAGE 1V4LUME FM.LER REMW11N0 FIEI.FD REiRA91Ut~10i 1 01.5,6 ,220 2,582,130 1996 32,470 12,122 340,548 2,302,136 366.070 2.640,034 7967 37,602 50,432 300870 2,540,034 446.122 2.403,302 1986 40 8 67 446 122 2403 502,607 2.426,09t t449 07,0 2,<25 7 2.330 2000 46,ad1 lpl,17f1 36M,tl71! 2,3;16,0'Ltl W0,p47 2,101,607 2001 49.700 71,141 010.007 2,209,697 710.146 2.216.000 2001 51,205 73,tS0 710.148 2,218,660 78:1,288 2.145,406 2003 '•f2A1T Tl,160 783x296 2,145,406 151,458 2,ffR1:1M6 2004 51,420 77,171 '6,b~/!f6 2.070.246 tA03.Q10 2005 55.426 74.110 435826 /.093386 1.014,60! 1,91x,606 2000 67,76,2 82516 1,014804 1.015,806 1,007,355 1.851,344 1007 g4,I21 e6p30 1.007.353 1831,349 1,103,705 1,746,314 2006 62,746 84836 1,163.386 1,74!,314 1,175,021 1806,113 2009 43.339 03,370 1,273,021 1,x,683 1,J66,301 1,962.313 znlu eb.o6a 97,zs4 1,J00,381 1,462,313 1,143,626 1,465.079 2011 70,030 1D0,440 1x163826 1496,074 1,661,163 1,304.134 2012 73,337 104,767 1,064,666 1,36+,196 1.109,3:#2 1,169,372 2ois 7a,1a~ 1x.717 1 ee4,~u ,,239,672 1,776,044 1,160855 2014 78,136 112,707 1.776.044 t,150,863 1.600,647 1,037,647 2015 67,906 117.011 1,090.047 1,037,067 2,007,858 020816 Zola 61,746 12t,066 2.Od7.001 4ZOA48 2,120,924 740,760 2017 07,812 125,246 2,421!„924 78!.780 2,251.171 674,833 2018 40,880 124,4 2,254,,171 674.533 Y,313,7?A 514.480 2419 83.791 133,961 2.3x7.724 '.!44,060 x,317,716 410.866 zoo 46,oos 138,365 t'~f17.n6 410.480 2866,E 2n,484 2021 40,905 138,686 ?,058,280 272.424 2.70{,845 133x160 ~ 130,905 136.566 1,7w,046 13x,869 2,fJ73,41a ~,TOt 2023 96,994 168.665 2,99s~14 .4,7oe 3,071,874 -143.210 2024 96.095 138.365 3871.974 •143X!0 3.210.650 -261,8SS 2025 98,905 178,' 3210,4!9 ,281,838 3.344,iW -420.740 1026 46.995 138.565 3,340,1fl3 -114.309 2,487,000 -060.004 2027 98.995 136.566 3.467,168 -868,901 3,620,272 -687.6?8 w26 96896 136,545 3.626.x12 -eo7.sze s.16i.T~T ~e~e.o9s 2029 96,996 136.505 5,761,797 ~36A93 4.003.762 -0T4:66~8 2030 p8,9Q6 136,563 3.903.002 ~8T4,666 4.011,9Q0 -1.116,222 2031 90896 136,503 4841.926 -,.,,1.222 .,,80,401 -,,261.787 2032 06,083 138,065 4,180,401 -1,151,787 4.319.0$3 -1,394.351 20.'!3 00.995 158.565 4.319.065 -1.300,351 4,457820 -1~lp16 2434 06.993 130,963 4,457820 -1,328816 4,698.165 -1J667,46i 2035 {!6,006 139,586 4,698.145 -1.087,481 4.794,749 -1,608445 p. 18 cao aN.+e rea~.w..M ~ Tso O~pldl+n uom~- TR4 0 AS6pC4ATE! "~rrnr `fir, PUBLIC WORKS DEP/~RTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Ray Wazny, Public Works Director ~~~~,,~. SUBJECT: Construction and Demolition Tipping Fees DATE: March 17, 1999 On March 11, 1999, staff conducted a meeting to discuss tipping fees. Attendees included: Leo Cordeiro, Solid Waste Manager Ron Roberts, Solid Waste Superintendent Robin Ennis, Recycling Waste Reduction Program Coordinator Roger Orr, Attorney, City of Port St. Lucie Kerry McNamara, South Florida Recycling Danny Kreiser, East Coast Recycling Jerry Kreiser, East Coast Recycling Sumpter H. "Sam" Barker, T. Hunt and Associates Alex Makled, CDM The minutes of the meeting are attached. Issues which were discussed included the accuracy of calculation made by Camp Dresser, and McKee and Timothy Hunt Jr. and Associates, a chart of estimated C&D costs based on weight rates provided by Commissioner Coward and recycling levels at the landfill. Attached are reports which address each of these issues. Consultants have established that the estimated cost of processing C&D material at the landfill is between $16 and $17 per ton. The difference in costs is explained by the method of allocating operational expenses. The numbers above reflect an increase in ~rrr+' emphasis on recycling by employing 4 persons in the C&D mixed material cell to recycle 7 to 15% of the material. By adding 4 additional people (total of 8) to recycling of mixed material in the C&D cell, costs will increase by approximately $3.00 per ton and a recycle rate in excess of 20% can be reasonably expected. Staff recommends that the tipping fee be set at $20.00 per ton for C&D material. If the Board wishes to increase recycling emphasis, an additional $3.00 per ton is recommended. RLW/sm 1.r/ `r!'~ MINUTES OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS MEETING SOLID WASTE DIVISION TIPPING FEES WORK SESSION March 11, 1999 - 2:00 p.m. Meeting was attended by: Ray Wazny, Public Works Director Leo Cordeiro, Solid Waste Manager Ron Roberts, Solid Waste Superintendent Robin Ennis, Recycling Waste Reduction Program Coordinator Roger Orr, Attorney, City of Port St. Lucie Kerry McNamara, South Florida Recycling Danny Kreiser, East Coast Recycling Jerry Kreiser, East Coast Recycling Sumpter H. "Sam" Barker, T. Hunt and Associates Alex Makled, CDM Meeting convened at 2:25 p.m. OPENING COMMENTS Ray Wazny presented attendees with a handout consisting of a breakdown and description of tonnage of C&D and waste collected at the St. Lucie County Landfill. (Please see 1st attachment). This analysis was provided by Commissioner Coward. The direction from the Board of County Commissioners was also to review the possibility of increasing recycling of C&D material. ALLOCATION OF OPERATING EXPENSES Mr. Wazny led a discussion with attendees on the cost analysis of 7.5% versus 12.83%. The ratio of 12.83% was established using C&D material as a percentage of total landfill tonnage. According to the hand out, the fee for C&D Material for 1998 was $21 /ton. This was based on the variation of 40-80 tons collected at 12.5% from 1995 -1997. Leo Cordeiro offered the attendees the following information: Actual Tonnage 1997 - 170,776 1996 - 193, 820 1995 - 197,445 C&D Tonnage 1997 - 37, 901 1996 - 58, 379 1995 - 58, 368 Percent 1997 - 22% 1996 - 30% 1995 - 29% Robin Ennis brought up the fact that this does not cover total tonnage. Some waste does +`/ `~e'/ not go over the scales. Based on her information she reports that Over scale total All Waste C&D 1997 - 190, 820 1997 - 261,121 1997 - 61,699 Ron Robert said that the landfill can only base the cost of recycling based on what comes in over the scales. Ray Wazny said that based on this information the calculations shown, on Attachment 1 are inconsistent and asked Leo Cordeiro if he could revise the chart in time for next Board Meeting. Leo said he would comply. Discussion on total costs ensued by attendees. Sam Barker offered some numbers based on T. Hunts report, Alex Makled mentioned closure cost difference per each year, Ray Wazny asked how variable that cost is, is it within .50? Leo Cordeiro and Jerry Kreiser disagree with basing the fee on the percent cost. Ray Wazny informed all attendees that the primary reason for this meeting was to be able to go back to the Commissioner Coward and present him with a consistent cost based on C&D tonnage, based on the information presented today the 7.5 or 12.5 percentages might not be the correct formula to achieve a consistent cost. Jerry Kreiser is not happy with the possibility of a percent increase. Ray agreed that the C&D cell is significantly different from other material at the landfill, Kerry McNamara stated the percentage formula presented by the county needs to include cost factors. Ray asked our consultants to address this issue. Alex Makled, and Sam Barker discussed the difference of C&D vs. Class 1, weight ratio vs. cost based on the 12.83 measurable index. Alex agreed that the density was an issue that needs to be revisited. Ray asked Leo if he would get the numbers Alex and Sam will need to revise the report in time for the next Board Meeting Tuesday, March 23, 1999. Danny Kreiser feels that because the report has been revised twice, how can another report address the issue anymore throughly and perhaps they should perform a study to further provide adequate information. Ray answered that the 7.5% -12.83% spread is a difference of $3.00 - $4.00. It is not a cost or time effective investment to further study the issue. Danny stated that unincorporated costs need to be more defined. Kerry McNamara asked Sam Barker how he arrived at the figures on the report. Sam said the numbers came from the St. Lucie County Solid Waste Division, and the closure costs and long term care comes from CDM. Danny brought up that the density amount seems rather out of proportion. Alex explained density issue. Density is based on fly over air space. Danny said if the density is too much that will change the life of the Landfill. Discussion ensued on actual tonnage vs. iMr.-° density. The report indicates that the tonnage is 40,000 based on density, and the actual ton is 13,000. Alex tried to explain the process. Ray asked Leo for the actual ton which is 13,000, and Alex said based on the aerial photos the tonnage on the report shows 40,000. Ray asked for a revised report from CDM based on this discrepancy, and informed all attendees that we will provide them with a report as soon as we receive it. Danny and Kerry asked Alex if he could provide a report on C&D similar to the one that was created for yard waste for this fiscal year. Alex said he would try, but the cost analysis creates a problem, and who will be funding the report. Leo informed Danny and Kerry that the Landfill funds the cost studies, not the taxpayers. COUNTY RECYCLING EFFORT Ray proceeded by handing out a Recycle Rate Form, (Please see attachment #2). Based on $17.00 per 100 tons of mixed C&D, Ray asked attendees their thoughts on how to increase recycling productivity, and to what degree can we become aggressive based on the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Port St. Lucie. Ray suggested the County expects a 15% increase based on 1 operator and 3 maintenance employees, and an increase of material. Sam asked Kerry and Danny based on their expertise in this business what percent they were recycling. Danny said the East Coast Recycling Business is recycling 33% based on 100 tons per day, 10 employees, 6 working days per week, with 9 hour days. Ray brought up that Mr. Lurix, DEP, told the Board of County Commissioners at the last meeting that 20%-35% was the typical recycling rate for recycling facilities. Ray said the County is producing at a rate of 35%, with 28% coming in pre-sorted, and 7% of the 35% is C&D. Ray asked attendees what they felt would be a reasonable rate to the St. Lucie County Taxpayers. Discussion followed which included adding 4 employees, separation rates, grinding contract for wood waste. Ray asked Alex for the figures based on this discussion. Alex replied that the cost would increase by approximately $3.00 if 4 more people were added to the C&D cell for recycling. Keay asked where they derived the number of 15% for an increase in productivity. Robin explained that this percentage increase is based on a higher rate of material. Discussion/ explanation between Robin, Kerry, Danny, and Alex ensued about the increased numbers and productivity. Ray interjected by saying he feels that the 15% might be conservative, perhaps it might increase as much as 20-25% if they increase the staff to 1 operator and 7 maintenance workers. Ray asked Leo is he felt he could utilize this amount of staff, and Leo replied that yes he could. Kerry disagrees, he feels there will be a need for another operator. Ray asked Kerry and Danny if they would be comfortable providing their business statistics for 1997, even though it is not required. Ray explained that the County must provide reports to many different municipalities, and are not able to do a comparison without all the information. Jerry told attendees that his company spent $80,000 last year without a profit. Kerry said that the County is subsidized from the State, and he feels the 28% must be removed from the equation because the landfill receives a guaranteed amount from Public Works Department. Ron Roberts explained of the 28% approximately half is from the Public Works Department. Discussion between Ron, Kerry, and Danny on segregating material began. Kerry feels strongly that the 28% should not be factored in, the C&D recycling business is in its infancy for the county and he feels the county should take 35%-40% of the same materials his company takes, and not bury them. Ray asked attendees what level of recycling should the County be at, and perhaps the comparison is an unfair issue and cannot be accomplished between the private sector and County Government. Robin explained. that an increase of 15%-20% is a goal, the County is new at C&D recycling also, and she is hoping to do more if possible by obtaining more material. She does not want to throw numbers at the Board that are not realistic. Kerry said number crunching does not seem to be getting us ahead on this issue. Ray stated that with the private sector doing 33%, the Board may want to see the County at 40%. A starting rate for $17 per ton plus an additional$3.00 will reflect additional recycling efforts. Ray stated that he was not comfortable with $20.00 and would like to see 10% added on as a margin for error. Based on today's discussion, an increase of $3.00 plus 10% for a margin of error places the rate a $22.00-$24.00 per ton. Kerry would still like to see a new density report from CDM and T. Hunt and Associates. Sam and Alex agreed. OPEN DISCUSSION Ray feels that a $3.00 per ton increase or $22.00-$24.00 rate is not out of line. Roger Orr, Attorney, City of Port St. Lucie, reminded all attendees that St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie has an Interlocal Agreement and the two main concerns to the City are: 1) Operating efficiently. 2) Operating at the lowest possible cost. Robin shared with attendees that in the recycling business the motto is pay now or pay later, and she reminded everyone that by not having the Interlocal Agreement, the City would have to charge its residents at least $2.00 more per month for recycling. Robin also stated that due to the recycling efforts by St. Lucie County they have extended the Landfill's life by 20 years. Ray asked Roger what the City's threshold of cost is, Roger replied that no threshold has been set, but he is sure the City would not like to see the costs increased unnecessarily. Robin suggested that the increase will reflect more material. Roger feels that the City is not sure what is prudent at this point. Roger feels that the St. Lucie County Solid Waste Department is doing a good job at this point, but feels the private sector is pressuring the County, and the City is not concerned about the private sector. Robin reminded attendees the Board would like to see the County increase its recycling efforts. Roger stated that the County is already at 35%. Danny also feels the Board would like to see an increase with the County's recycling. Ray asked Alex if CDM would address the density issue and revise the report for the Board. The cost and yard waste issue was discussion further between Danny, Kerry, Ray, Ron, and Robin. Leo suggested the report exclude the 7.5% -12.83% and base the report on a line by line itemization. Kerry would like to see the Landfill do a 3-6 month study, start with a clean slate and base its cost analysis on that information. Ray again stated that for the cost increase of a $3.00- $4.00 amount the study would not be cost effective. Alex stated that the report will be and has been based on real numbers per past statistics. Kerry feels that does not apply to C&D because this is a new field for the County. SUMMARY Ray Wazny summarized the meeting starting with Roger Orr. Mr. Orr would like to keep the costs down and has no problem with the fee set at $17.00 per ton based on operation costs. Mr. Orr does not support a fee increase to enhance recycling at this time. Kerry McNamara, Danny Kreiser, Jerry Kreiser, feel there should not be a comparison because it is not closely related enough. Too much like apples and oranges. Ray stated the following issues need to be revised or reviewed: 1) Revise report supplied by commissioner Coward, adjusting the weight ratio from 1995-1997. 2) CDM needs to revisit density issue and report on discrepancy of 13,000- 40,000 tons. 3) CDM and Mr. Hunt will revisit recycling effort based on eight employees. If Board chooses to increase recycling emphasis, the cost will increase approximately $3.00 plus 10% for a margin of error. 4) All attendees of this meeting will receive new reports as soon as they are available. 5) Above all else we are looking for fairness to the St. Lucie County rate payers. Kerry asked if he has a problem with the report can this agenda item be tabled for another week. Ray assured him that if there is an issue it can be presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Meeting Adjourned at 4:35 p.m. -'\r/ '~ CAM Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. environmental SCNlCBS 1601 Belvedere Road, Suite 211, South West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 Te1:561689-3336 Fax: 561689-9713 March 16, 1999 Mr. Ray Wazny, P.E. Public Works Director St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 33482-5652 Subject: Construction and Demolition Tipping Fees Dear Mr. Wazny: The purpose of this letter is to provide the additional information requested from Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) at our meeting on March 11, 1999 regarding the above referenced subject. We understand that the information is needed to clarify the following issues: ^ The waste in place density calculations for the C&D facility. ^ Comments on the weight ratio index cost allocation method. ^ The incremental cost increase, on the per ton basis, to the C&D tipping fees, if four (4) additional laborers (pickers) are employed to increase C&D recycling. In-Place Density Based on aerial surveys performed annually for the C&D cell, in conjunction with scalehouse records, an in-place density for the C&D waste is computed. Over the past four years the in- place density for the C&D cell ranged between 1,200 to 1,500 pounds per cubic yard. For the period of November 1997 through October 1998, the density is calculated to be 1,436 lbs/cy. This number is based on the waste tonnages divided by the cubic yards of air space occupied. Specifically, the density is calculated as follows: Density = 21,388 tons x 2.000 lbs per ton = 1,4361bs/cy 29,790 cy of air space Please note that at our meeting on March 11, 1999, Mr. Kreiser was questioning the 1998 tonnage numbers presented in Timothy F. Hunt Jr. & Associates' report dated March 2, 1999. The explanation is that the 40,379 tons was a projected number based on waste received at the landfill in 1995, 1996, and 1997. We all know that, in 1998, the C&D waste received at the Glades Road Landfill was drastically lower than projected due to the opening of the private C&D facilities within the County. In fact the actual tonnage for the period of November 1997 through October 1998 was 21,388 tons. It appears that Hunt's report did not clearly explain the difference between the projected and actual C&D tonnages received at the Glades Road Landfill. C~~ Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Mr. Ray Wazny March 16, 1999 Page 2 Weight Ratio Index Method We do not recommend the mere use of the weight ratio index method to calculate the cost of C&D disposal. There are major differences between the regulatory and operation requirements of class I landfills and C&D facilities, thus, the cost is different. We prefer the detailed breakdown of cost method based on actual expenses. Our review of the County operating costs (see Table 1 attached) and our independent opinion of probable operating costs for C&D disposal in St. Lucie County remains at approximately $17.00/ton. Additional Labor for Improved Recycling It is our understanding that the County currently recycles approximately 7.5 percent of its mixed waste that crosses the landfill scale. This rate is achieved using a crew of four (4) workers (one equipment operator and three laborers). Should the County desire to add four additional laborers to improve recycling, the incremental cost per ton will increase approximately $3.00 dollars. This figure is derived as follows: Four (4) workers at an annual cost of $24,300 per worker = $97,200 $97,200 divided by 31,300 tons = $3.10 per ton. Assuming: 100 tons per day of C&D waste received at the landfill and 313 operating days per year We appreciate the opportunity to provide you with this information. If you should have any questions or comments, please do not hesitate to contact us. Very truly yours, CAMP SSER & McI{EE 1NC. S. Alex H. Makled, P.E., DEE Principal Engineer AHM/bes File: 6277-074 cc: Leo Cordeiro, SLC E. Lawrence Adams, CDM BS4417.WPD A ~p m n m Z m ~ c ~ ~ c~ -i D O O D ~ v c ~ ~ O ~ T T O O z z cn cn m fJ ~ fJ Z ~ O ! ~ ~ C ~ -I n 2 ~ z O ,~ ~ m < < m m D D z c c c r cn < ~ _ = n -< c O - -i m ~ m 0 =i m m ~ g --i .D .D ~ ~4 -~ m O m m O n n o ~ c ~ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ l Z r D (~ (~ z D ~ D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ D = ~ ~ p ~ m m z m ~ -I ~ r ~ ~ O c z z m m ~_ ~ c n t n D -i m ~ _ ~ D p z z z m O m 3 ~ C z D =~ ~ D Q° .U m ~ ~ ~ m -1 ~ ~ ~ ~ Q° ~ Z r cn Z c7 ~ Z C) ~ -~ ~ O = O Z Z .~ m w O ~ O m Z r cn cn ~ G1 z O ~ O cn z ~ n n D ~ cn -~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ z ~ m cn < -a -~ c m z p z m D v C n m v ~n n C c v ~ z m ~ O D ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ r 3 D ~ r" (A C m m C~ X ~ ,~ ~ ~ m z m ~ ~ N ~ Z p O m z < < Z D z z ~ 3 c n y Z m v -~ n ~ ~ O N N _ V j ~ W V ~ _ O _ ~ W C W t0 ~ O CO N W N CO N O N CO O CO f0 OD A ~ CT ~ V_ ~ V ~ A O O ~ O N A W N O W O ~ ~ O U7 O ~ ~ W A ~ O V V O O COO A fNl1 N N O ~ W OAD OOD A 0 0 0 COO O ~ ~ ~ N n ~ ...a A ~I aD -+ N O t O ~ 0 ~' ° ~ o w w o rn rn ° ~ ° ~ m 0 o o o o a v ~, ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ -~ z r -• n W ~l O N p bi N N N N N p C N v x N o OD ~ A Do Oo Oo Oo do ~ C W ~ GA O O o Qo ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ o A v n d a W o ~ is ° p T o Q~ ~ J W D W O b9 W 0 ~ ° 'p N °O C O t ~ p 01 W ~ N N ~ \° C n N ~ IV 7 3 Z y CU 7 A CD O y O `C D ~ O ~ m ~ N ~ ,O ~ N '~i !i~ 0 Z N '0 m v D -< X w w v D ~.~1 II O m Z -1 n Z v m ~ ~ ~ ? I w o c G7 ~ O n m cn O z ~ ~ ~ n D v v ~ 'o O w oo -1 ~ ~ O Sp ~ ~ O 'v 'o 'v ~ ~ O c Z D D ' 'v O fJ ~ T -i D D r ' v ~ ~ y ~ ~ c C '~ m z c O m ~, cn ^ m ~ c D ?' m --~ -i < O O -i Z O O O Oo r m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c r m o ~ ~ ~ O O ~ z ~ m m n ~ ~ ~ ~ s~ ~ ~ ~ cn ~ ~ r Cn y m ao a~ w o~ ~ R° ~ ~ r ~ _~ ~ m ~ O cn m - p O m ~ D y D ~ v ~ ~ ~ m O ~ ~ r Z r r r r Q° ~ m ~ fp C Z m ~ Z O C p D c C cn c_n v n r ~ fn ~ K v ~ c ~ v v v v c ~ G7 -U v '~ ~ ~ D D ' QD Z < ~ Q, ~ D ~ ~n Q, O O G) O m m oo ~ v cn ~ c cn ~ ~ r T O m (~ Z m ~ v O v ~ ~ m m C c ~ Z m 3 ~ ~ m ~ ~ z v z ~ z n ~ uDi D ~ ~' ~ m ~ ~ ~' m m m m m m r' = Z ~ c n D ~ ~ = m ~ m m ~ Z ~ m m z ~ ~ ~ z D cn Sp z D G7 m C7 m = O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cn -~ cn -~ O Z z m z ~ ° ~ G) m m m ~ m 0 ~ D G7 ~ ~ ~ '~ a' ~ O m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -~ ~ o z m z t/1 m W C7 V ~ O O O ~ A W _ ~ -~ A -+ A N A -~ N N -+ N A N N ~ O J v O <.Ti ~ O O ~ O O W O IV V O O V c0 A N O W N W V i0 W CO O CO O OD N N V N V O Cn O O CJ1 A O V O CT O O O O O CT O N O V N O O O O O O O O A W OD O CT N O O ~ N V W O A 0 0 W A ~ O O V n ~ ~ p us II n te ~ ~ r ' ~ O o~ W Cr N N ~, ~o w -. ~ ° Y -~ V ~l A 0 0 N ~ OD W O N 01 ~ W A W E ~ N m V N tJ0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00i v _ O O ~ O CVO COO 000 W ~ OV0 0 0 ~ ~ CVI~ O O V O N COTS ~ ~ A A A O O N N A N N N N N O p p N N N y y N y O N 0 0 ~ 3 OD OD ~ a) o OD OD OD OD OD ~ ~ 00 00 00 N 0 N 0) OD N N o 00 0 o ~ W o ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ o w m 0 0 0 ) o o a 0 0 0 O O O o t ~ N y 0) N a O a O Q O o ~ N a N ~ ~ m ~ ~ a ~ ~. y y a, n a ~ ~ r; J m 3 b b ~ 3 ~ o i m o i 3 ~~ ( ~a N N y N N O O O O N ~ ~ ~ N N CN (/~ y O ~ ~ s' ~ ~ `~ m ~ n ~ ~ 3 ~ 3 m z /J N ~. '~ Q ~°Q ~~ ~ ~. '~4 5~ J~ r~ \\v~~l,, OV z 0 -~ m N o m ~ o m a~ ~ ~ rao~ m N (D y n a~~ ~ = o . ~ ~ ~ C n (D -„ m 0 a o .. m (D Q' O v ~ -, -- -„ sp ~ o m sv ~ ~ - o -o. m ~ ~ aQ m ,Y ~~-, ~ ~ p ~' a y Q v v a o ~ N N ~ O C N ~. ~ ~ W a ~ ~^~ `' Q o ~ C O `< ~ n N N O n ~D D ~ ~ o fQ n N `G (D N ~ ,... O '-. ~ ~ .~ (D ? ~ ~ N a `rr Q ~ m m m ~° (D ~ ~ n~ ~ o N ~ ~ _~ r o N d Q ~. ~f o a m o n 3 D m a~ ~~ a ai c m m ~ O (~ N d ~ n N 7. tp (D ~_ N d O (D N O m fD C fD 7 p ~O Z ~ n Z ~O m -+ ~ Z mn 0~ C mm n n r~ zm ~~ m v n 0 m ~ m D a = v' ~ i ~. ~ n (n m m ~ m ~ m fl- c o N ~ n o ~ p ~ II ~ ~ N N 7 ~ C N ~ ~ ~ ~ o m 1 ~ m o ~ ~ ~ ~ n o ~ m ~ ~ ~ W ~ c .A C~ ~ `, ~ ~ ~ ~ W N N Efl b9 ffl ~ 6l9 O U1 W -+ CJ~ 00 ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ N b9 Efl 69 N Efl 0 U1 W --~ ~ (O O OWOV~ N A ,awoc~n w ~ w coo ~ ~v~ CWO ~ ~ ffl EH EA C~J1 Efl W CJ1 W -- ~1 (O N OWO~~ A A o > > n ~ 0 0 ~3p ~vn~ ~ c c ~ ~ m - y O O D D - 3 ~ o > > n m ~? > > ~ ~ ~ m ~ . ~ ~ ~ a O O . $ ~~Z ~ o D~ o ~n~ ~ ~v m ~~ . ~ ~ ~o -' -i C7 o m > >~D mn~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~ m a v ~ ~ ~ ~_ x ~ y ~ a ~ ~' m 7 N CO CO v N_ jA 0 d- D 0 V r CW OD ~ N ~ O N O O OD 000 EA N io ~ _ W W OD 0 .a C11 -~ ~?0 N v N O ~ O e O O C Efl N CO CO V ~ ~ a+ no~ Wc NC J1? N ~ CO 00 ~7t ~1 O A lWO~ W tflO 0 0 X 0 0 N 0 N ifl Cfl ~ (fl ~ ~ ~ W 0 O v0 A o OD0 0 ~O ~7f 00 ? O O-- O e 00 N n '~ 3 v 0 C 47 C7 O D ~ ~ ~ ~ D v 0 T ~ N ~ v r~ x '~ ~ m z "' ~ 1 tD ~ <° cn CO (D (O V _ ~ S t0 * * c.t, •ta W N -~ cn •1a W N -~ > D D ° ~ ~ ao -I _I ~ ° C7 ° m D c7 m D r N ~ f2o -I ~ 0 i V1 ~ Cp O n ~ ~ fD CD y - O O y 7 o O O t 3 3 cn ~ c ~ fl- o ~ ~ m cn ~ o cn v ~ v ~ _ c ~ ~' y -~ ~ c~'j ~ ~D ~ Z ~' ? ° ° °' ' ~ ~ cQ cQ • n ' ~ vi ~ O ~ a - n ~ - ~ o y to ~ ~ ' ~ ~ to o n m C1 ° N - ° ~ ~ ~ y ~ o c n o C7 0 ~ o ~ D ? n• v ~ a o o '~ r ° m n~i c ~ ~ o o ~ y z n ° ~ y ~ ~ m `z D ° D ~ ~ o o n y ~ ~ o m ~ ' ' c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ° ° ~ n ~ ° ~ m ~ m " ~ n ~ ° ~ ~ y ~ a n ? o a ~ - m o ~ ' -I o O m ~ o 5 i o ~ ~' ~ ~' o Q m ~,• Z~ ~ ~ ~ m _ x C7 n o f L Q X CD ~ Q Q . ~ ~ ~ ~ iU N ~ ~ ~ Z1 O ~ O X ~ _ ~ a c - p- ~' cn ai ~ fl. 7 n• Cn a D y N ~ m m y n ~p ~ ~ i m N Q. ~ w m o I~Tl ~ cn O N O• ~ ~ ~• ° ~ m `'' ~ ~ ° m ~ ~ C O N ~ CD ~ y O• n ---I p ~ 3 ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ C% ~ O (n 7 N 11 > ~ ~ ~ ~ K 0 O N _ o ^! p ~ a _ :U ~ fn , C -. CO n ~ ~ ~ Q = Z N ~ ~ ~ -~ P ~ ~ y N ~ N n 17 ~ Efl 6i9 ~ Efl EH ~ A 000 V v O W T ~ Cp fD n ~ O fD m V N N ~ ao ~ GJ co O CJt CO IV ~ (O ~ CC `G O D CO Ut (~ c11 ~ N -+ O N O O V O ~ CJ7 N ~ CD ^^ r- (n 0 O O O 0 00 00 O 0 O c O O ~ ~ ~ ~• m ~. ~' _ ~ m ~ i s ° rn o. a ~ m N ~ ~ ~ : ~ _ N m N m N ~ W ~ ~ ~ _ : CO ~I Ul O ~ .s ~ n d9 r ~ 69 Efl ~ ~ OOD N V O O Z ~ ~ CO n j ~ 00 Z .A ~ b9 ~ ~ IV ~ N N W O ? O CJ1 O OD W CO ~1 N 0 "I S ~ ~ CL ~ G~ N oo O Oo ~ ~ ao O CO O c O O ~ ~ C _ CO ( N C ~ ~ N O -p . E!9 ~ ~ p~ ~ . j t-A ~ G9 C.T7 O ~ i V W ~ N CJ1 69 CJ1 Efl CT ~ CO ~ ~1 CO 00 O O ~I ~ ~ m ~ rn o 0 o rn ~ o ~°o~~ rn ° ~ ~ ~ C) C7 O ~ V C ~ N ~ N ~ ` m ~ c0 ~ 1 c'> O N m ~ ~ aD 0 0 ~ 0 1 I ( i1 ~ N N ffl CJ1 69 CJl ~I ~ CJl 0 0 0 C GJ O W W O 0 0 GJ ~ I CT O ~ ~ E19 O -+ •P GJ CA ~ .P 0 O O 0 O c N O ~I O ~ I 0 C7 EH N EA CO O V ~ ~ ~ O O ~ 0 N Efl ~ ~ D O O C 0 0 00 ,p CO Efl ~ CO 00 ' 00 N O CNO A + ~ ~ (O N ~I O V CT ~ O O V O c CJi 00 ~ `:~ r So.A~„r+'aste Authority of Palm Beach County, North Courity Landfill Disposal Cost October 1, 1997 to September 30, 1998 Consumption Data Approximate Landfill Acreage (Balanced Llle 59%Class 1) Volume in Cubs yards per Acre (net of final cover) Total Estlmated Landfill Volume (net of final cover) Cumulative Volume Depleted Prior Year Volume Depleted October 1.1997 to September 30, 1998 Cumulatlve Volume Depleted Current Year Total Tons Disposed October 1, 1997 to September 30, 1998 Average Pounds per Cubs Yard Total Tons Disposed to Date Average Pounds per Cubic Yard Cost Data Debt Service per Cubic Yard Debt Service Allocation Cell Construction per Cubic Yard Total Celi Construction Expense Landfill Closure per Cubs Yard Total Landfill Closure Ffnanclal Responsibility Landfill Post-Closure per Cubs Yard Total Landfill Post-Closure Imputed Cost Wages and fjenetits Equiptrtent Ovming and Operating Administration/Other Construction Operations Allocation Dredge Sand Usage Environmental Programs Allocation Facilitles and Grounds Allocation Utllitles Department Allocation Total Operating Expenses Ferrous Revenues Total Landfill Expenses Average Cost per Ton Landfilled ~j Average Cost per Cubic Yard Depleted Average Cost per Ton Processed Opsrat I~ Post-Cbsw ll III' Landfill Component Cost Summary IJ Debt Se-rvic- e Cell Construction Closure financial Responsibility 1 I Post-Closure Accrual Operating Expense Total Cost 111 W .x Clasa 1 Class 3 Total Total Per Ton Total Per Ton 197.23 137.05 334.28 119,790 119,790 119,790 23,625,548 16,417,753 40,043,301 3,349,000 2,690,000 6,039,000 528,000 199,000 727,000 3,877,000 2,889,000 6,766,000 433,060 168,740 601,800 1,640 1,696 1,656 3.369,926 1,865,472 5,235,398 1,738 1,291 - 1,548 $1.62 $1.62 $1.62 $855,360 $1.98 $322,380 $1.91 $1,177,740 $3.89 $2.94 $3.63 $2,052,538 $4.74 $585,769 $3.47 $2,638,307 $1.34 $1.34 $1.34 $709,147 $1.64 $267,273 $1.58 $976,420 $0.83 $0.83 $0.83 $437,355 $1.01 $164,837 $0.98 $602,192 $480,332 $487,430 $967,762 435,793 975,798 1,411,591 291,463 347,014 638,477 0 0 0 36,066 25,349 61,415 67,197 67,197 134,394 153,963 153,963 307,926 168 095 94 437 262,532 $1,632 909 $3.77 52 151,188 $12.75 $3,784 097 ($4,259) (54,259 s5sa7.3o9 513.13 $3,487,188. $20.67 $9,174,497 $13.13 520.67 $15.25 510.77 517.52 512.62 . $13.13 518.35 $14.72 o.bt s.rvic. caA construction c.n t^,orutruction Class 1 $1.98 15.04% 54.74 36.09% $1.64 12.47% $1.01 7.69% $3.77 28.71% $13.13 100.00% Op.ratln~ ~oaurs Class 3 $1.91 10.41 $3.47 18.92% S 1.58 8.63% $0.98 5.32% $12.75 69.49% can ao 100.00% rt-aosurs n.bt S.rvics '~1i/' v.. PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Ray Wazny, Public Works Director ~j~/G `~`~'~~ SUBJECT: CDM Tipping Fee Analysis DATE: May 6, 1999 On May 6, 1999 I received the attached report from Camp Dresser and McKee Inc. which provides a detailed analysis of Construction and Demolition Fees at the landfill. If you have any questions concerning the report, please call me at 1485. RLW/sm cc: St. Lucie County Administrator Utilities Director Solid Waste Manager East Coast Recycling South FL. Recycling ~\./ ~~M Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. environmental 1601 Belvedere Road, Suite 211, South services ~/,/est Palm Beach, Florida 33406 Te1:561689-3336 Fax: 561689-9713 May 5, 1999 Mr. Ray Wazny, P.E. Public Works Director St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 33482-5652 Subject: St. Lucie County Glades Road Municipal Solid Waste Landfill Construction and Demolition (C&D) Tipping Fees Dear Mr. Wazny: As requested, Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. (CDM) has undertaken additional analysis with respect to the captioned issue in St. Lucie County. The purpose of this letter is three-fold: to present our current analysis; to respond to various issues raised in Mr. McNamara's letter of March 31, 1999 to Commissioner Coward; and, to provide other factors for the Board of County Commissioners to consider when deliberating the C&D tipping fee issue. ANALYSIS OF C&D COSTS We have developed an analysis of the tip fees that would be required for various levels of C&D deliveries to the County's landfill. This analysis is described below. Table A calculates the annual C&D deliveries to the County's landfill that would be required to match the life of the C&D cell to that of the Class I capacity assuming that balefill operations are implemented in the Class I facility. By employing this matching of the useful lives of the existing Class I and C&D capacities, the entire facility can be closed at one time, and new capacity for both waste types acquired concurrently. (This assumption represents a reasonable approach to determining the annual C&D tonnages that could be accepted.) We estimate that the use of Class I balefill operations would extend the life of the Class I capacity to year 2034. Based on aerial survey, the remaining capacity available in the C&D cell at the end of Fiscal Year 1998 was approximately 2,462,744 cubic yards. Growth rates in C&D deliveries to the County's landfill are projected based on population growth in the County. In-place density of 1,300 pounds per cubic yard beginning in Fiscal Year 1999 is assumed; calculated in-place density in Fiscal Year 1998 was 1,360 pounds per cubic yard. The additional assumption is made that the level of recycling would increase from the current reported level of approximately 7.5 percent to 15 percent, commencing in Fiscal Year 2000. A value of 27,021 total tons of C&D across the scales in Fiscal Year 1999 results in virtually full utilization of the C&D cell by the end of year 2034. The 27,021 tons per year converts to 86.33 tons per day fora 313 day operating year. CDM Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Mr. Ray Wazny, P.E. May 5, 1999 Page 2 Table B presents the total Fiscal Year 1999 budgeted costs for the County's solid waste enterprise fund. These costs are then apportioned to C&D operations based on certain allocation bases. Total personnel expenses are allocated based on direct assignment of four persons to C&D operations. In addition, scale house personnel are allocated to C&D based on the estimated fraction of C&D deliveries to total solid waste deliveries to the landfill in this year. (For Fiscal Year 1999, this fraction is estimated to be 20 percent.) Management and clerical personnel are also allocated to C&D using an indirect cost allocation factor of 84.1 percent, which represents a proportionate allocation to Class I and C&D based on direct personnel costs. The footnotes in Table B describe the various other bases used to allocate cost line items to C&D. Due to their significance, several of the line items warrant discussion here. ^ Debt service is allocated to C&D in Table C, which reflects allocation of items funded by the Series 1990 Revenue Bonds. Of the total debt service associated with the Series 1993 Revenue Bonds, which were used to refund the Series 1990 Revenue Bonds, 4.45 percent relates to the C&D operation. ^ While C&D closure costs are budgeted and are attributed wholly to C&D operations, the County does not yet budget for C&D post-closure care nor land replacement costs. C&D post-closure care costs are based on an estimate of the current annual requirement of $50,286 for a period of five years beginning in year 2035. A sinking fund deposit of $8,216 annually at an assumed interest rate of 4.5 percent with a three percent inflation allowance would accumulate the required funds by year 2034. ^ For land replacement, it is assumed the County would purchase 70 acres of land (which includes buffer) at $20,000 per acre in 1999 cost levels. A sinking fund deposit of $55,701 annually for 30 years at 4.5 percent interest with a three percent inflation rate would accumulate the required funds. Summing all of the costs associated with C&D yields a total annual amount of $605,813. Table D uses the total annual costs estimated in Table B in conjunction with the 27,021 tons developed in Table A to compute the per ton costs for selected line items and for the total costs. As can be seen, a tipping fee of $22.42 per ton would be required to recover all costs if daily deliveries were 86.33 tons. Table E summarizes the full cost per ton for C&D waste at the County's landfill. In addition to the disposal cost computed in Table D, we estimate that an additional $3 per ton related to four additional recycling pickers would be required to achieve the 15 percent recycling level. Adding this amount to the $22.42 per ton processing/disposal cost for C&D yields a total cost of $25.42 per ton. Key to computing this rate is the assumption of receiving the 86.33 `~' ~.r/ CDM Can1p Dresser & McKee Inc. Mr. Ray Wazny, P.E. May 5, 1999 Page 3 tons per day at the landfill. Recent history demonstrates that a high level of price elasticity is associated with C&D waste deliveries. Figure 1 presents historical C&D deliveries to the County by month in conjunction with the tipping fee charged for C&D. As can be seen, C&D deliveries to the landfill generally increased over time for the past several years until the private C&D facilities commenced operations in late 1997, at which time deliveries to the County's landfill dropped off sharply. The County subsequently decreased the C&D tipping fee to $20 per ton, which was less than the price charged by the private facilities. C&D deliveries to the County's landfill increased immediately. Because of the nature of C&D waste, contractors and others disposing of this waste type have little or no consideration for any factors other than price. Thus, since private facilities are in operation very close to the County's landfill, deliveries will be almost exclusively dependent on the relative prices charged by the respective private facilities. As a result, if the County were to continue charging a relatively high price for C&D waste, such as $30 per ton, the County can expect to receive a relatively small percentage of the total C&D waste stream. Alternatively, if the County charges a tipping fee rate that is lower and more in line with that charged by the private facilities, it is much more likely that the County would receive a higher percentage of the waste stream, and with more stability. Because most of the costs associated with C&D operations are fixed, the County could find itself in a "rate paradox". In this situation, the tipping fee has been set at a relatively high level, such as $30 per ton, but because the private facilities have a significantly lower price, the deliveries go almost all to the private entity, with little to the County's facility. In this case, the cost per ton to the County could exceed the price charged, since the cost of service is highly dependent on actual tons delivered. County-wide generation of C&D is estimated at an average of roughly 160 tons per day. Receiving C&D waste amounts of 100 tons per day and 150 tons per day would yield lower processing/disposal costs per ton as indicated in Table E. Such lower rates would increase the probability of receiving the tonnages on which the rates are based. RESPONSE TO ISSUES This section responds to various issues raised in Mr. McNamara's letter of March 31, 1999 to Commissioner Coward. ^ The land mass factor now used is 25.3 percent, which reflects 34.8 acres of C&D out of a total 137.8 acres C&D plus Class I. This factor is employed both in allocating certain costs in Table B and in allocating certain debt service components in Table C. ^ Yard waste is a separate cost center, in which the tipping fees and revenues from mulch products recover the costs of processing. `~/ CDM Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Mr. Ray Wazny, P.E. May 5, 1999 Page 4 \.r~ ^ Post-closure care is included in the full cost of C&D, and is estimated at $0.30 per ton. ^ Well monitoring is not required for the existing C&D cell. ^ We have kept separate the capital costs of equipment purchase/replacement and operating costs. We can, however, combine them to compare with the $217,848 amount quoted in Mr. McNamara's letter. The cost for the equipment operator is a direct cost of $33,000, plus an indirect cost of 84.1 percent, or $27,753, for a total of $60,753. Equipment replacement is included as $125,000 annually. Equipment maintenance related to C&D is estimated as $15,141 annually. Gas, oil and grease are estimated as $12,173. Summing these components yields a total equipment related cost of $213,067, which is only 2.2 percent less than the amount stated in Mr. McNamara's letter. Furthermore, it is important to note that these costs are already included in the calculation of the disposal cost per ton of C&D. ^ Regarding the in-place density issue, based on aerial surveys performed annually for the C&D cell, in conjunction with the scalehouse records, in-place density values for the C&D waste has been computed. Over the past four years the in-place density for the C&D cell ranged between 1,200 to 1,500 pounds per cubic yards. This range is consistent with local and national industry standards as supported by the attached information. In summary, we recommend that for the County to have both a fair and financially prudent C&D operation that it neither levy a tipping fee that is below cost, nor one that is significantly higher than that charged by the private facilities. The County has a range of options from which to choose, including those shown below. Full Cost Per Ton FY 99 For Alternative Scenarios (7) Scenario (Tons/Day) Disposal and Current Recycling Cost ($?on) Up to 30% Recycling Cost ($/Ton) Total Cost ($/Ton) 86.33 $22.42 $3.00 $25.42 100 $19.36 $3.00 $22.36 150 $12.90 $3.00 $15.90 (1) Equals total annual cost of $605,813 divided by tons per day divided by 313 operating days per year. Regardless as to what rate the Board of County Commissioners elects to adopt, this issue should be reviewed at six month intervals to assess what has transpired during the preceding half year. Ld CDM Camp Dresser & McKee Inc. Mr. Ray Wazny, P.E. May 5, 1999 Page 5 We appreciate the opportunity to serve the County on this important matter. Please contact us should you have any questions or comments. Thank you. Very truly yours, CAMP DRESSER & McKEE INC. _,=~~ i , ~ 1. .-~ `~-~,.~n2.„ Daniel T. Anderson, P.E. DTA/bes Enclosures File: 6277-23397-066.PM[1], w/enclosures bs4508.doc TABLE A ST. LUCIE COUNTY MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE LANDFILL CALCULATION OF C&D LANDFILL CAPACITY UTILIZATION TO MATCH CLASS I USEFUL LIFE Year (1) Growth Rate Factor (2) Tonnage Across the Scales (3) Waste Disposed Tonnage Volume (4) (CY) (5) C ~~ D Landfill Volume (CY) Beginning of Year End of Year Filled Remaining (6) Filled Remaining (7) Tons Across Scale Per Day 1997 N/A 37,682 56,452 2,492,534 1998 N/A 20,260 20,260 29,790 436,170 2,492,534 465,960 2,462,744 64.7 1999 N/A 27,021 24,994 38,453 465,960 2,462,744 504,413 2,424,291 86.3 2000 1.0306 27,849 23,671 36,417 504,413 2,424,291 540,830 2,387,874 89.0 2001 1.0291 28,658 24,360 37,476 540,830 2,387,874 578,307 2,350,397 91.6 2002 1.0283 29,468 25,048 38,535 578,307 2,350,397 616,842 2,311,862 94.1 2003 1.0275 30,278 25,736 39,594 616,842 2,311,862 656,436 2,272,268 96.7 2004 1.0267 31,088 26,424 40,653 656,436 2,272,268 697,089 2,231,615 99.3 2005 1.0260 31,897 27,113 41,712 697,089 2,231,615 738,801 2,189,903 101.9 2006 1.0425 33,253 28,265 43,485 738,801 2,189,903 782,285 2,146,419 106.2 2007 1.0422 34,657 29,458 45,320 782,285 2,146,419 827,606 2,101,098 110.7 2008 1.0419 36,109 30,693 47,220 827,606 2,101,098 874,826 2,053,878 115.4 2009 1.0417 37,613 31,971 49,187 874,826 2,053,878 924,013 2,004,691 120.2 2010 1.0414 39,170 33,295 51,223 924,013 2,004,691 975,235 1,953,469 125.1 2011 1.0381 40,663 34,564 53,175 975,235 1,953,469 1,028,410 1,900,294 129.9 2012 1.0379 42,205 35,874 55,191 1,028,410 1,900,294 1,083,601 1,845,103 134.8 2013 1.0377 43,796 37,227 57,272 1,083,601 1,845,103 1,140,873 1,787,831 139.9 2014 1.0375 45,440 38,624 59,421 1,140,873 1,787,831 1,200,294 1,728,410 145.2 2015 1.0373 47,137 40,066 61,641 1,200,294 1,728,410 1,261,935 1,666,769 150.6 2016 1.0347 48,771 41,455 63,777 1,261,935 1,666,769 1,325,712 1,602,992 155.8 2017 1.0345 50,455 42,887 65,979 1,325,712 1,602,992 1,391,692 1,537,012 161.2 2018 1.0344 52,190 44,361 68,248 1,391,692 1,537,012 1,459,940 1,468,764 166.7 2019 1.0343 53,978 45,881 70,586 1,459,940 1,468,764 1,530,526 1,398,178 172.5 2020 1.0341 55,820 47,447 72,995 1,530,526 1,398,178 1,603,521 1,325,183 178.3 2021 1.0340 57,718 49,060 75,477 1,603,521 1,325,183 1,678,998 1,249,706 184.4 2022 1.0340 59,680 50,728 78,043 1,678,998 1,249,706 1,757,042 1,171,662 190.7 2023 1.0340 61,709 52,453 80,697 1,757,042 1,171,662 1,837,738 1,090,966 197.2 2024 1.0340 63,807 54,236 83,440 1,837,738 1,090,966 1,921,179 1,007,525 203.9 2025 1.0340 65,977 56,080 86,277 1,921,179 1,007,525 2,007,456 921,248 210.8 2026 1.0340 68,220 57,987 89,211 2,007,456 921,248 2,096,667 832,037 218.0 2027 1.0340 70,539 59,959 92,244 2,096,667 832,037 2,188,911 739,793 225.4 2028 1.0340 72,938 61,997 95,380 2,188,911 739,793 2,284,291 644,413 233.0 2029 1.0340 75,418 64,105 98,623 2,284,291 644,413 2,382,914 545,790 241.0 2030 1.0340 77,982 66,285 101,976 2,382,914 545,790 2,484,890 443,814 249.1 2031 1.0340 80,633 68,538 105,444 2,484,890 443,814 2,590,334 338,370 257.6 2032 1.0340 83,375 70,869 109,029 2,590,334 338,370 2,699,363 229,341 266.4 2033 1.0340 86,210 73,278 112,736 2,699,363 229,341 2,812,098 116,606 275.4 2034 1.0340 89,141 75,770 116,569 2,812,098 116,606 2,928,667 37 284.8 * Footnotes on following page. DTA:C:\MYDOCUMENTS\EXCEL_FILES\ST LUCIE_COUNTY\CandDAnalysis.xls FIN-FY97 5/4/99;9:13 AM "~+~ Footnotes to Table A: `~/ (1) Class I landfill life estimated to be extended to year 2034 by use of balefill operations. (2) Based on projected growth in the service area population reflecting U of F BEBR estimates. (3) Based on a starting value in 1999 that with the growth rate will fully utilize the C&D capacity by the end of year 2034. (4) For 1998 and prior, 7.5% recycling assumed; for 1999 and later, 15% recycling assumed. (5) Based on an in-place density of 1,300 pounds per cubic yard beginning in 1999. For 1998 actual, a value of 1,360 lbs./cubic yard used. (6) Remaining value for C&D cell reflects a total volume of 2,928,704 cubic yards, based on the permit modification of July 24, 1995. (7) Airspace remaining at year end for 1997 and 1998 based on aerial surveys. OTA:C:IMYD000MENTS\EXCEL_FILESIST LUCIE_COUNMCandDAnalysis.xls FIN-FY97 5/4l99;9:14AM ~~ 'rrrdr TABLE B ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET COSTS ALLOCATED TO C & D ` ACCOUNT NAME FY 98/99 BUDGET AMOUNT COSTS RELATED TO C & D PERSONNEL EXPENSES: SALARIES $689,848 SALARIES -REIMBURSEMENTS 0 NEW POSITIONS 0 NEW POSITIONS -DELETIONS 0 OVERTIME 10,000 OVERTIME -HOLIDAY PAY 10,000 FICA 44, 074 FICA MANDATORY 10,302 RETIREMENT 116,492 GROUP INSURANCE 155,040 LIFE INSURANCE 3,070 WORKER'S COMPENSATION 51,175 UNEMPLOYMENT COMPENSATION 2,278 TOTAL PERSONNEL EXPENSES (1) $1,092,279 $105,900 ALLOCATED SCALE HOUSE PERSONNEL COSTS (2) 15,524 ALLOCATED MGMT. & CLERICAL PERSONNEL COSTS (3) 89,062 OTHER COST CATEGORIES: PROFESSIONAL SERVICES (4) $321,527 $10,200 PHYSICAL EXAMS (5) 1,000 0 ACCOUNTING & AUDIT (6) 375 75 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES (5) 898,277 0 OTHER CONTRACTUAL SERVICES-YARD WASTE (5) 200,000 0 AUTOMATED SERVICES (6) 25,019 5,004 TRAVEL (6) 3,700 740 COMMUNICATIONS (6) 9,359 1,872 POCKET PAGERS (6) 390 78 POSTAGE (6) 1,000 200 UTILITIES (7) 32,800 3,427 LANDFILL CHARGES (5) 5,000 0 EQUIPMENT RENTAL (5) 6,500 0 INSURANCE & BONDS (8) 84,468 3,763 EQUIPMENT MAINTENANCE (9) 165,000 15,141 BUILDING MAINTENANCE (6) 2,500 500 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE (8) 5,000 223 PRINTING /BINDING (5) 2,700 0 MATERIALS CENTER (6) 750 150 PROMO ACTIVITIES (6) 1,500 300 PROMO ADVERTISING (6) 12,000 2,400 ADVERTISING (6) 1,500 300 G & A (6) 125,000 25,000 LICENSES 8~ FEES (6) 2,755 551 WATER QUALITY TESTING/GLADES (5) 40,000 0 WATER QUALITY TESTING/AIRPORT (5) 40,000 0 INTERDEPARTMENTAL CHG (5) 5,000 0 OFFICE SUPPLIES (6) 2,500 500 Footnotes on following page. Anders-1.xls ANDERS-1 5/4/99;8:44 AM \.r+r TABLE B (CONTINUED) ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA FISCAL YEAR 1998-99 BUDGET COSTS ALLOCATED TO C & D ACCOUNT NAME FY 98/99 COSTS RELATED BUDGET AMOUNT TO C & D OTHER COST CATEGORIES: (CONTINUED) SMALL TOOLS (6) EQUIPMENT UNDER $750 (6) COMPUTER SUPPLIES (6) OPERATING SUPPLIES (6) SAFETY SUPPLIES (10) GAS, OIL & GREASE (11) UNIFORMS (10) DUES & MEMBERSHIPS (10) BOOKS & SUBSCRIPTIONS (10) TRAINING & EDUCATION (10) IMP O/T BLDG (5) IMP O/T BLDG/PHASE III CONSTRUCTION (5) IMP O/T BLDG GAS RECOVERY SYSTEM (5) EQUIPMENT & MACHINERY (12) PRINCIPAL (13) INTEREST (13) C & D CLOSURE C & DPOST-CLOSURE CARE (14) C & D LAND REPLACEMENT COST (15) TOTAL OTHER COST CATEGORIES GRAND TOTAL COSTS 3, 000 600 7,615 1,523 2, 260 452 22, 937 4, 587 1, 500 375 130, 000 12,173 5, 000 1,250 233 58 1, 074 269 5, 495 1,374 31,808 0 2,330,920 0 703,266 0 401,070 125, 000 540, 000 24, 054 506,665 22, 569 66, 702 66, 702 8,216 55, 701 $6,755,165 $395,327 $7,847,444 $605,813 (1) Equals three laborers at $24,300 per person per year plus one equipment operator at $33,000 for direct cost. (2) Annual scale house personnel costs of $77,621 allocated based on 20% C&D estimated waste delivery fraction. (3) Annual management and clerical costs of $354,169 allocated to C&D at an indirect cost rate of 84.1 percent, reflecting ratable allocation to Class I and C&D based on direct personnel costs. (4) Based on an 30% of the estimated annual cost for aerial survey and financial responsibility. (5) None of these costs are associated with C & D operations. (6) Based on 20% of total, which is the estimated fraction of C & D waste to total waste deliveries during Fiscal Year 1998-99. (7) Equals 20% estimated fraction of C & D waste of the quantity of the total less $14,813 for FPUA less $852 for leachate pumps. (8) Based on 25.3% of land disposal land mass (34.8 Ac. C&D/(34.8 Ac. C&D + 103 Ac. Class I)). (9) Equals year-to-date actual costs for five months annualized by multiplying by 12/5. (10} Allocated based on 4 persons dedicated to C & D out of 20 persons total direct activities, i.e., 25%. (11) Equals actual $9,364 of Fiscal Year 1997-98 actual increased by 30% to allow for increased tons. (12) Based on annual average of replacing $625,000 of equipment every five years. (13) Equal 4.45% of total P&I, taken from Table C. (14) Equals annual amount required from now until closure to provide annual post-closure amount of $50,286 (at 1999 cost levels) annually for five years. Assumes 3% annual inflation of costs and 4.5% interest earnings rate. (15) Assumes purchase of 70 acres of raw land, at a total cost (including design, permitting, etc.) of $20,000 per acre in 1999 cost levels, escalated at 3% annually for 30 years, earning interest at a rate of 4.5%. Amount computed is the annual required deposit to a sinking fund. Anders--1.xls ANDERS--1 5/4/99;8:44 AM • ~,, Sri TABLE C ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ALLOCATION OF SERIES 1993 REVENUE BONDS TO C&D (1) Portion Total Allocable Item Amount to C&D Airport Landfill Closure $4,043,000 $0 Construction of Golf Course 3,307,000 0 Phase III Landfill Contraction 4,657,000 0 HCC Parcel Purchase (2) 3,100,000 784,300 Phase (Closure/Phase II Cell Construction 2,500,000 0 Total $17,607,000 $784,300 Percent of Total 100.00% 4.45% (1) Based on the Series 1990 Bonds Official Statement. Since the Series 1993 Bond issue was strictly a refunding of the Series 1990 Bonds, the same allocations remain applicable. (2) Based on 34.8 acres of C&D as percent of 137.8 acres C8~D plus Class I combined. Anders~1.xls ANDERS~1 5/4/99;8:43 AM \./ TABLE D ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA COMPUTATION OF FULL COST PER TON FY 99 Annual Amount Line Item from Table B Total Per Ton (1) Direct Labor Costs Allocated Scale House Personnel Costs Allocated Management & Clerical Personnel Costs G&A Expenses Equipment & Machinery Debt Service C&D Closure C&D Post-Closure Care C&D Land Replacement Cost All Other Costs Total $105,900 $3.92 15,524 0.57 89,062 3.30 25,000 0.93 125,000 4.63 46,623 1.73 66,702 2.47 8,216 0.30 55,701 2.06 68,084 2.52 $605,813 $22.42 (1) Based on total estimated annual C&D tonnage of 27,021 tons from Table A. Anders~1.xls ANDERS~1 5/4/99;8:27 AM `~Irr+ TABLE E ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA FULL COST PER TON FY 99 FOR ALTERNATIVE SCENARIOS (1) Up to Scenario Disposal 30% Recycling Total (Tons/Day) (2) Cost ($/Ton) (3) Cost ($/Ton) (4) Cost ($/Ton) 86.33 $22.42 $3.00 $25.42 100 $19.36 $3.00 $22.36 150 $12.90 $3.00 $15.90 (1) Equals total annual cost of $605,813 divided by tons per day divided by 313 operating days per year. (2) First scenario based on Table A; other scenarios reflect higher possible levels, depending on amount of tip fee. (3) This cost include the cost for current recycling practices (7.5% to 15%.) (4) Assumes four additional personnel as pickers for recycling. Anders~1.xls ANDERS~1 5/4/99;8:48 AM o~ u_ C ~ O U ~ U N d Q' o w otS v U ~ ~ °' E ~ o d. U w '~ C ca J N ~ ~ O y' ~ > N d d ~ .Q ~ ~ ~ U A C ~' p t O ~ U p d ~ .~ 7 r N ~rr+ r.r~° (uol/$) saa~ 6uaddi1 a'8~ /(~uno~ In O N N ~ ~ N ~ M M 66-Jey~ 66-4a~ 66-uef 86-0aa 86-noN 86-300 86-daS 86-6ny 86inf 86-unf 86-~eW 86-~dy 86-~eW 86-9a~ 86-uef L6-0aa L6-noN L6-300 L6-daS L6-6ny L6-Inf L6-unf L6-~(eW L6-~dy L6-~eW L6-ga~ L6-uef 96-0x0 96-noN 96-100 96-daS 96-6ny ,~ 96-Inf c 96-unf o 96-~(ey~ ~ g6-~dy 96-~eW 96-4ad 96-uef S6-0ap c~-noN S6-10O S6-daS S6-6ny S6-Inf c~-un f S6-~eW S6-~dy S6-JeyV S6-4a~ c~-ue f b6-oaQ b6-noN b6-30O b6-daS b6-6ny b6-Inf b6-unf b6-/~eW b6-ady b6-~eW b6-9a~ b6-uef £6-oaQ £6-noN £6-300 °o o °o °o °o °0 0 0 0 Q ~°' M M N N .N- O I!7 C 0 o co fA C {O 0 ~ y=. ,-. ~ ~ ~ o cv J ~ O y `n °~ a i LL ~ L > c • Q .~ O ~ ~ ~ U U T ~ L + -~ C c ~ 0 c I cD M (~ (suol) a~eaS ssoa~y sa~aan~~aa p~g~ Vii Vli tfb lUU 11:Jy ,'tid 1J1G1LV41V1 • ~ i - .. ' In~~~try News cartti~acrd f•urr prrt;e 7 tasted due co the. cutbacl:s..~lrhaugh IvfWA still provides an rducacional pto- grantand tecluticil assistartcc in the arrt of waste reduction and rcc}•cling, the organi~;ttiun is nut able to:~csiSt t:tti~ttF+:r- nies to much on•sitc;tc iu tltc.ptst. MWA's educational program includes a guidcbcx~k rl-at }ursrnrs rccy- cling options Iqr c(-ntructuts, and c,:tl- uates the benefits obtained through rec-vciing. Axpatate h~~c51: ptrscnts maz- kets fur rcc}•cled nrtttrials. Although it is rtu lunpcr able to assist cc-ntpunics with on-sift visits, 1V1WA is still av;tilablr to refer indi- viduals and cr,mp:tnirs tv}to arc scck- Ing a culleccion system to cuntraccors who wilt best shit their needs. On-line reusable bulldittg materials exchange An an-flat Reusable t3uildlttf; Materi- Wear Ce!•D Drbrir Rtcyclisg frequtncly aro asked rttauy questions regarding the new and evolving construction rnacerinls recycling industry. The two most frequently :tls Exch.-nar (IL13;~4C) is a~;til;tb(r that fetuses specifically on used and sur- plus building marerials.'I~tis web-sire acldrrss is ltttp:l/wtvw.e+.re.ur~,.bmc RBMIs was de~eluprd b.• the l :ner- vy C)tttrraclt C:cntcr rn assist L~usinrss- ea t1-;(t cannot score uSCc{ ~trtd surplus huildit(ly tnatrcials, and co :tssist indi- viduals w}to arc seeking a s;+urcr for these materials. I hC fL'rvICC Qtr(~et3 loctlly listed materials; users e:un view Ii~tin~s posted by (xhe-~s ..itltin their own county. ~)uring dYC site ~ pilot phase, tr:tns- :tctions arc limited u:+ Thurston, Main, and Pierce (.;aunties in Vi'ash- ingt(m Scutt. Beginning in January of 1998, tht Center hopes w add more counties and states through a sttb- scripci~n servlcC. Tltc listings arc automacic;tlly Iccpt up-eo-doer. All listings will expire :tl'ter a set period of time (tur- rentl}~, one month af'rer the listing is iuitiully posted). Roofing shingles experiments Thr Tc.~tas Ucp:~rr- meat of Transporca- tion has been c(tn- ducting cxprrimer~tal testing that involvee incnrpor:ttiug roulin~ shingles in aspliult pavrmrnt mixtures. In a pro~~ct ip C:orsiC:ttta, tltrTexac Gl7'1' added ~°o shinnlc manutsctur- ing tv;tStr to ant teat section and j'Yo consumtt w•astc rewFint; to another test srctiun. Bath scctinns ~t•'re approximately 1,0(10 ft It+rt~. Initial results reportedly are p(isitive, and during chc next year the :tt~tnc}' ti~•ill m~nicor the toads. Cticb waste. Thanks to the (icsrarch Cenrcr at National Assoeiauon of Homebuildcra, below is ~ chart that ottc- lincs some t~timatcs. based on their xtudics. For more qucsrlons heard involve gypsum recycling (xec page 8) infarrnation, contact tt+e center at (301)249-1000. and what ix chc ~vcighc or density or something similar, of IUl~terials aens~ties~ MATERIAL [)ENRITY OF MATERIAL Dr~OKEN OR WA$T~ Wt)t7d Drywall Pf~sier Masonry (brick) Aephaltflobfinq •Shirtgles Metals (aluminum, copper, brass, steel) ~..~• Mixed~,peinolltibn Rubble 2:7b Ib/bot~rcl!ool 1.8 Ib/square foot fi0 lb (Iooss~~:•. 16t).If7 (harri:mineral)LcubiCfeot • : . 120 Ib/cubic foot 22$.a~hOO:gquare.feet or~cover2gs; 165-d90 Ib/cubic toot NIA DENSITY 30d Ib/cubic yard 350 Iblcublc yard 1,OOt) Iblctibic Yard 1,400 Ib/cubic yard 70o Iblcublc yard 500-1,500 Ib/cubic yard 1;400 Iblcublc yard " The densities Ilsted above are approximate-considerable variations oan occur given ttow materials are h>,ndlod, com- pacted, mlxad, etc. . ~ In taxi n•/FrLr,.dn~ Il1!).1' C7l•. t) Oetiii; Rc~-.~.ti... '~ '~•~" • ~ ~""~ Solid Waste Authority of Palm Beach County, FL North County Landfill Disposal Cost October 1, 1997 to September 30, 1998 ~ Consumption Data Approximate Landfill Acreage (Balanced Life 59% Class 1) 1 Volume in Cubic yards per Acre (net of final cover) Total Estimated Landfill Volume (net of final cover) Cumulative Volume Depleted Prior Year Volume Depleted October 1, 1997 to September 30, 1998 Cumulative Volume Depleted Current Year 1 Total Tons Disposed October 1, 1997 to September 30, 1998 Average Pounds per Cubic Yard 1 Total Tons Disposed to Date ~..-.~~Average Pounds per Cubic Yard Cost Data Debt Service per Cubic Yard Debt Service Allocation Cell Construction per Cubic Yard Total Cell Construction Expense Landfill Closure per Cubic Yard Total Landfill Closure Financial Responsibility Landfill Post-Closure per Cubic Yard Total Landfill Post-Closure Imputed Cast Wages and Benefits Equipment Owning and Operating AdministratioNOther Construction Operations Allocation Dredge Sand Usage Environmental Programs Allocation Facilities and Grounds Allocation Utilities Department Allocation Total Operating Expenses Ferrous Revenues Total Landfill Expenses Average Cost per Ton Landfilled Average Cost per Cubic Yard Depleted Average Cost per Ton Processed nd.. ce..a..e Opera. Post-Closur Class 1 Class 3 Total Total Per Ton Total Per Ton 197.23 137.05 334.28 119,790 119,790 119,790 23,625,548 16,417,753 40,043,301 3,349,000 2,690,000 6,039,000 528,000 199,000 727,000 3,877,000 2,889,000 6,766,000 433,060 168,740 601,800 1,640 1,696 ~ 1,656 3,369,926 1,865,472 5,235,398 1,738 1,291 -~---~ 1,548 $1.62 $1.62 $1.62 $855,360 $1.98 $322,380 $1.91 $1,177,740 $3.89 $2.94 $3.63 $2,052,538 $4.74 $585,769 $3.47 $2,638,307 $1.34 $1.34 $1.34 $709,147 $1.64 $267,273 $1.58 $976,420 $0.83 $0.83 $0.83 $437,355 $1.01 $164,837 $0.98 $602,192 $480,332 $487,430 $967,762 435,793 975,798 1,411,591 291,463 347,014 638,477 0 0 0 36,066 25,349 61,415 67,197 67,197 134,394 153,963 153,963 307,926 168,095 94.437 262.532 $5,687,309 $13.13 ~ $3,487,188 $20.67 ~ $9,174,497 $13.13 ~~ $15.25 $10.77 $17.62 $12.62 $13.13 $18.35 $14.72 Debt Service CeY Constnxtion Cell Construction Operatirx :losure ;t-Closure Landfill Component Cost Summary Class 1 Class 3 Debt Service $1.98 15.04% $1.91 10.41 Cell Construction $4.74 36.09% $3.47 18.92% Closure Financial Responsibility $1.64 12.47% $1.58 8.63% Post-Closure Accrual $1.01 7.69% $0.98 5.32% Operating Expense $3.77 28.71% $12.75 69.49% Total Cost $13.13 100.00% $20.69 100.00% W .X a i a rN ~ Q m H ~rn~~vN~ J C a G •~ LLI ~-- ~" R ,~ ~ .a o 0o cD V co m o rn ao r O O \ ch v~ncor~aoaorno aGi ~_`. v 4 L V a~ a tio~~~~~~ a ; a~~ , ~~~~~~~~ w y ~ ~ C1 c'7Nf_O)~N~~D R1 O = _ ~" f~NtnNCOMO~ Q O •G d~mcht~v~o~co W O ~ •~o a ~ d ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~_ ~ o ~ ~ ~' ui cfl E C ~ y O C coD ~ ~ o N p ~ ~ ~ a~ O ~ v O `" a rnr~cocDm~n~nrn ~ v co r~ ~ ~ rn co v ~ °~ G ~ ~ ti~v_ao~v_ao~- m m a~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ a ` w ~ ~,~ a, o>>y = a n,~0 ~ ~ ~ ~ o .' ? .. '~ ~ C a~ a~ G rn a~ Eti ~ a ~~~~N~ ~' ~ •G 4f h ,1NNstN~N (p C O V ~~ ~ w w ~ r r r r r t~- ~ C -p ~ (Lp .~„ ~ V y y ~ ~ o a~ ~ a~ Q~~ V 3 G .yQ ~ N in ~ E N G "O C.1 0 ~. lt. ~ O ~ p d ~ C ~ ~ o n ~ C J o 0 .- co ~n cO o~ v' ~ °- o p p p y NNOp~OCONh cD c9 N c9 •L ~ •a N ~ O) 00 h l1) V N of N ~ 3 p 7 v O ~ .~ ~ t1') ~ t0 ~ a0 Oi O N C ?• ~ ~ U Q N y~ G y O C Z y ~ ~ ~ ~S G `' c ~ m c~ p U a J ~~ 3 N~~ m t9 3 G y C °' c°fl~~`e°co -o a ~ c a~i O G O i^, c~chvv,v° m ~ coo p~ >, p ;G, O y cp OOOOOp U ~ v~ w _ U ~ e•~ a ~+ p N f6 ~ O N G L C Ql 'O V ~_ ~ ~ ~ Q. U ~ ~ ~ ~ p C d ~ ~ C7 Q w p ~ n ~ _ ~ U (9 t4 C w N V' 00 V~ ~ N p (0 s N ~ O ~n ca ~n rn rn > ro ~ ~ y a M .- in t~ ~ N a CO " ~ ~ cB ~ ~ -~ .- m _ _ ~ a~ L~ 1 y N (~7 ~ V~ 7 d fD ~~ C ..a yG 0 V' C~ ~ t9 p ,G ~ Q ~ ~ ~ f0 Ql On C 'p ~ (9 ai V J '- ~ C n ~ y ~ ~ O VI C ~ ~ 7 `~ ~ r o7 CO~C70000000 ~ N c-(O OOw OON~(D Op OOO Vim-- ~ N f9 ~'` U ~ N .U C NN'7 tD~000r'NG")~(O (O p U ~ E f9 ~ ~ (9 Q. f~ O N E (O Q 00 ~ M t!') t~ O ch w N ~- 7 O N ~ n a0 rnoooowol~~l: ~N •y 3 ai c n ~ °> ~ Q ~ o p p~ p~~ p O~v~ncptiO rno Ncov~cD ~ U cu m m ~ >• m G rnrnrnrnrn rnooooo00 ~ a~ ~ ~ > nnna naan.aaa E E U ~ o ~ Z U ~ a~ a~ a~ a~ a~ a> a~ a~ a~ a~ a~ a~ m o o ~ ~ ~ m ~ m ca W cn cn cn ~ cn cn cn cn cn cn cn co to ~ tL U U U U cn U U ~ N M < ~ <O 1~ m OI ` ~ ~ ~/ "~' PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SOLID WASTE DIVISION MEMORANDUM 99-149 TO: Ray Wazny, Public Works Director ~~~~ 1! VIA: Leo J. Cordeiro, Solid Waste ManagerC ,~ ~. FROM: Ron Roberts, Solid Waste Superintendent DATE: May 3, 1999 RE: Revisions Attached is a revised summary of calendar year 1998 landfill/recycling activities at the Solid Waste Division. This revision is due to the fact that 5,702 tons of incoming material from the Road & Bridge Division was not charged as construction and demolition debris when coming across the scales. Rather, the material was charged as fill, when in reality it was construction and demolition debris. This practice was employed because the Solid Waste Division stock-piled this material for future use. Therefore, the tonnage is placed in the recycled tons column. This data has not been transmitted to FDEP. The information is due to FDEP on or before October 1, 1999 and is compiled by the County's Recycling Coordinator. RR/am Attachment St. Lucie County Calendar Year 1998 Tonnage Report St. Lucie County Landfill January 1, 1998 -December 31, 1998 Tons Landfilled Tons Recycled Total Tons Class I MSW 109,231 0 109,231 Yard Waste (includes land clearing debris) 0 27,763 27,763 C & D 18,842 1,418 20,260 White Goods 0 136 136 Tires 580 0 580 (Other) 0 5,702 5,702 TOTAL 128,653 35,019 163,672 Remaining capacity (in cubic yards) of the Glades Cut-Off Road Landfill 11.,~,.A~O. Number of years of permitted capacity remaining 25 •Chart reflects calendar year data whereas Fly Over data utilizes tonnages from actual Fly Over dates . Revised May 3, 1999 G:\COMMON\TABLES\tonscalndr.wpd ~' Exhibit I ~~1~ ~~~~ ~` ~,0 ~~/ St. Lucie County Calendar Year 1898 Tonnage Report ~ Sf. Lucie County Landfill January 1,1998 -December 31,1998 Tone Landfilled Tons Recycle Total Tons 109,231 0 ~ 109,231 Class I MS1111 0 27,763 27,763 Yard 1Nasts (Includes tend clearing debris) 13,140 7,120 20,260 CE~D 136 0 136 Whits Goods 580 0 580 ` Tires 0 0 0 . (Other) 122,951 35,019 157,970 TOTAL Rernainin pac'rty (in cubic yards) of the Glades Cut-Off Road Landfill 1u~58 9 Number f years of permitted c8pacity remalt>ling ---Z~~' Revised February 3,1999 N:1WIN1WP1Tipping Feeslto~scelndr.vrpd '~/ CONSENT AGENDA ;. 05/21/99 FZABWARR FUND TITLE 001 001106 001111 001116 001117 001120 001122 001221 001235 001242 001804 001805 101 101001 101002 101003 102 102001 105 107 140 160 182 _ 183 183001 183004 183204 183206 185203 186 186202 315 316 382 401 401217 418 421 441 451 461 491 501 505 505001 510 631 625 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ~ PAGE WARRANT LIST X34- 15-MAY-99 TO 21-MAY-99 FUND SUMMARY EXPENSES General Fund FTA-001-49 USC Sec 5307 (Sec 9) FTA-001-49 USC Sec 5307 96/97 Sec 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning 98/99 FTA 49 USC Sec 5307 98/99 Community Services Block Grnt 98/99 CDBG--World of Plastics 001-DEP-Childrens's Enviro Museum TDC Planning Grant 98/99 98/99 E. M.. P.A. SFWM/SLSWCD Well Monitoring Program SFWMD/SLSWCD EQIP Program Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust Interlocals Transportation Trust/807 Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Port & Airport Fund Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Environmental Land Acquisition Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court Court Reporter Grant-In-Aid 98/99 FDJJ-Teen Court 98/99 FIiFA-SHIP 98/99 Recycling Operating Fund DEP-Recycling & Education 98/99 County Building Fund County Capital Environmental Land Capital Fund Sanitary Landfill Fund DEP-Waste Tire 98/99 Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund Building Code Fund Automated Services Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Service Garage Fund Tauxis:t Uov~l,ApmCt~t TxuataAdv Fund Law Library 105,574.62 2,285.00 3,997.00 4,041.80 851.00 2,150.00 1,150.00 2,300.00 267.83 1,154.42 135.43 6,104.00 75,472.22 87,222.82 291,465.04 22,702.30 17,791.25 1,250.80 3,068.63 232,478.95 10,033.27 2,629.22 129.50 867.69 550.12 66.95 166.50 95.70 444.33 650.45 728.61 462.00 55,276.14 99,892.20 44,844.18 4,123.70 8,682.92 1.90 826.50 825.33 15,226.98 1,390.26 29,570.65 18,191.b6 739.35 30,038.59 20,088.70 255.65 GRAND TOTAL: 1,208,262.16 .~...-~,..x ~.., PAYROLL 21,149.60 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6,365.00 0.00 0.00 o.oo 0.00 27,514.60 ~' 05/21/99 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 1 F~gWARR VOID LIST~~ 34- 15-MAY-99 TO 21-MAY-99 FUND: 107 - Fine & Forfeiture Fund CI~CK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00241754 99019864 Avis Rent A Car 103.46 FUND TOTAL„ 103.46 --. ..~, ~ .~ ~` AGENDA REQUEST ~ ITEM NO. C-2-A DATE: May 25, 1999 REGULAR[] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Pl1RCHASING SHARLES BI_CIiL ~ B 1 T: Bid #99-048 Purchase of Sod and Re-sprigging Open Space Football Field BACK R On March 31, 1999 bid were opened for the purchase of sod and the re-sprigging of Open Space Football Park. Twenty six vendors were notified, four sets of bid documents were distributed nad three bids were received. The low bidder Bannerman Landscaping will not honor their bid and the next low bidder is over budget. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends rejecting all bids. AISSION ACTION: [ APPROVED [ ]DENIED [ ]OTHER: ) ~~: County Attorney:(X) c'oord~ nati olln~~,,/S3 Qnatures Mgt. & Budget:_-/'"~'`'~'J Other: Originating Dept: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) [~"o~ Anderson County Administrator Purchasing Mgr.:(X) ~~~ Other: Eff. 1 /97 H:\WP\AGENDAS\BIDS\99-48 reject.wpd ~2~ LEISURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT M g M O R A N D U M TO: Charlie Bicht, Purchasing Manager FROM: Ray Lopez, Parks Manager THROUGH: Jack Doughney, Leisure Services Direct DATE: May il, 1999 SUBJECT: Bid #99-048, Resprigging Open Space Football ***************************************************************** Please be advised that the Parks Division has reviewed Bid#99-048 for resprigging of Open Space Football Field and has been in contact with the low bidder - Bannerman Landscaping Inc. We personally met with Mr. Bannerman at Open Space Football F-field, and after discussing the project, Mr. Bannerman stated that he could not perform the project as bid and withdrew. The second bidder, South Florida Grassing Inc., with a bid of $25,044.00 is over ~:.'~C; fi.~ Therefore, it is our Departments professional opinion that both of these bids should be rejected; and we would like to consult with you on any further procedures that may be available. RL/hh h:\wp\aprigbid fir/ ~~~ o ~ a~ ~ a~ ~ n = ~= a= m ~m m n a~ ~ ~ o ~~ ~ r m m m • • --i ;-~ r „ .. v W O! i~ ~ a f/- !/- M T N N ~ N a 00 oy yy yy ~ N N ?i z ~'1 TI oz 'T1 7'I oz Z < ~y y N ~~ a < c Z ~ a a ~ ~rn ~~ ~ err- ~ ~~ ~ o~ ~ r z rn Z Z Z Z ~- M ~w M .D as aD NN j C1 o=' ~ N ~~ y~ r- ma ~z oz v=' ~ < am ~~ r"~ ~ rn~ ~ D ~ ~~ rnrn rnrn ~ o ~~ ~~ O ~ ~ Q r N z m _ i1- N w~ Z~~ ~zN Z !~- mN M M ~~ °~ ~~ y ~°~° ~ O ac y~+ ~~ „ ~~ V~-~ ~w :_ ° o_ rn o_ to 2 Z'n rn ~~ o ~y-~ r~ rn ~~ O r ~m rn„a ca ca~ ~ O Q pm ~~r ~ ~r ~ ~r ~~ O o~ Z~m O C rnm ~~ ov n O ~ Zm T a ~ a~ ~ w r m z m * O ~ ~m ~ ~ Z C7 Dm= Wvn ~~~ Dy rn r ,~ D ~nz o~ ~ m W - ~ ~ i ""' ~r ^ a lG ~ ~ - O •• z O O ~ O v D O v rn t!1 ~. ~~ coo co ff '~~ a C a -I O z ,J~ VY ~: rn ~ AGENDA REQUEST ~ ITEM NO. C-2-B DATE: May 25, 1999 REGULAR[] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): PURCHASING CHARLES BICHT SUBJECT: Approval of Assignment and Extension of Contract for Solid Waste Collection and Disposal Services for St. Lucie County Facilities. BACKGROUND: In 1997 Kimmins Environmental Corp. was awarded the bid for solid waste collection and disposal for county facilities. Subsequent to that award Jennings Environmental and Waste Management has acquired Kimmins. The County has had no problems with the current vendor and would like to extend the contract for services. FUNDS AVAIL.: Various department budgets PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the assignment and extension of the contract for solid waste collection and disposal services and authorize the chairman to sign the contract. [ APPROVED [ ]DENIED [ ]OTHER: ~~ County Attomey:(X) ~`'~ Mgt. & budget: Originating Dept: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable)_XX_ Eff. 1 /97 ~~ D u nderson Cou tv Administrator Purchasing Mgr.:(X) Other: H:\WP\AGENDAS\OTFiER\facility waste collection renewel.wpd ~, `° C2 APPROVAL OF ASSIGNMENT AND EXTENSION OF CONTRACT FOR SOLID WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL SERVICES FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY FACILITIES THIS ASSIGNMENT AND EXTENSION is entered into this day of 1999, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (the "County"), WASTE MANAGEMENT, INC. ("Waste Management") and JENNINGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. ("Jennings"). W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, on March 4, 1997, the County entered into a contract with Kimmins Environmental Corp. ("Kimmins") whereby Kimmins agreed to provide solid waste collection and disposal services for St. Lucie County facilities (the "St. Lucie County Facilities Contract") for an initial. term of two years with an option to extend the contract for two additional terms of two years each; and WHEREAS, on May 8, 1998 the County approved the assignment of the St. Lucie County Facilities Contract from Kimmins to Jennings and subsequently Jennings merged with Waste Management; and WHEREAS, the County has agreed to approve the assignment of the St. Lucie County Facilities Contract from Jennings to Waste Management and the parties have agreed to exercise the option to extend the St. Lucie County Facilities Contract for an additional year until March 31, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the County and the City hereby covenant and agree as follows: -1- err/ `r.e~' ` 1. Approval of Assignment. The County hereby approves the assignment of the St. Lucie County Facilities Contract from Jennings to Waste Management. 2. Extension of Contract. The St. Lucie County Facilities Contract is hereby extended through and including March 31, 2000. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County, Jennings, and Waste Management have each caused this Assignment to be executed by their duly elected and .authorized officers as of the date and year first above written. ATTEST: DEPUTY CLERK BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS COUNTY ATTORNEY WI;TNE S S E S : ~ ; 1 ~ .~ WASTE M2,I~T GEMENT , INC ~_~ ~ ~, / L ~j ~ /~'~ Print : ~~'~~~ ~ ,~,,~s~ Title : :~.5~...~'i~~ ~~~~~~~ 1 a. WITNESS S: ~ ~ ~ JENNINGS ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC r ,. . ,r ~; - ;~^;,; Print : ~'~cf ~~ r~~t,~'t~. Title : ~s'~.~'r;'~ ~~fs~Ac~~-~ ~' C:\JWL\AGREE\JENNINGS WASTE MANAGEMENT-EXT.WpD -2- .~' TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): PURCHASIN_C~_ St 1BJEGT: Award bid #99-050 Annual Road Resurfacing ITEM NO. C-2-C DATE: May 25, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] PRESENTED BY: BACKGROUND: On May 5, 1999 bids were opened for the County's annual road resurfacing project. Seventeen vendors were notified (one is minority owned), three sets of bid documents were distributed and two bids were received. The low bidder is Ranger Construction in the amount of $779,646.17. The budget for the resurfacing project for this year is $900,000. FUNDS AVAIL.: 101003-41132-563000-42003 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of bid #99-050 Annual Road Resurfacing to Ranger Construction for an amount not to exceed $900,000 and authorize the chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. [ APPROVED [ ]DENIED [ ]OTHER: n r+~,r,rdi nat~ ony/~_gnatures Count Attorne : X) a/~ Mgt. & Budget:(X1_~"~^J Y Y( Originating Dept: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) ~_ u Anderson County Administrator Purchasin Mgr.:(X) ~•~~ 9 Other: Eff. 1 /97 H:\WP\=.GENDAS\BIDS\99-SO award. wpd .~ ~e PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Charlie Bicht, Purchasing Director VIA: Harvey Lincoln, Budget & Management Director FROM: P. M. Bowers, Road & Bridge Manager~,Mj DATE: May 12, 1999 SUBJECT: 1998/99 Resurfacing Please agenda the 1998/99 Resurfacing Contract for the May 25th, 1999 Board meeting. I recommend awarding the bid to the lowest responsible bidder, Ran ction. Funds are available in account #101003-41132-563000-42003.,? Constru PMB:sb cc: Ray Wazny, Public Works Director ~, w - Dewey Hudman, Project Coordinator ,~ --a ~ -. Gerry Looney, Engineering Inspector j°°` ,~ r- ~ ~_ _ - rn ~- '-~ ~ ` r ~ ~ - ~~! r,~-. ~~. ~ C_; .,,.». .. ~~ _ d ~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~, -E 00 - Q~ J +ct .J ~ ~~ ~ (17 ._ ~ ~ w w a w o ~ ~ F- Z ~ _ V1 0 ~ 0 V W V > J ~ J > Q U m > a ~ ~ W j ~' m Z V ~ ~ o _ 0 Q ~ ~ ~ o~ ~~ ~0 Q Q p Q ~ ~ ~ O ~ TW Z Q r 0 ~Q ~ ~ Z W Z W a W W W ~ Q Q 'IC ~ ~ Q Z ~ z ~ W ~C D Q ~ ~ ~ ~ N d^ 'd' 0 ~ Z O ~ ~ V O ~ ~ ~ Z ~ z ~ z ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ _ M W 2 ~ ~ '"' 0 O ti 0 .C .Q 7 O t N .0 Ri •L d 9C w~'' 0 W F- O Z N W_ Z Q a 0 U W W m Z O W w V W N 0 m LL w m Z '` ~ 99~-~~ ~~~~~~C~~g ~~~~~C~ 05/05!99 ime: 90 Days C N G Est..;:;`:;` :. Unit Total Unit Total :.: ,.. O~sc ;'~ ; tort:;:::<':.... <, ~. :::> Sidi ~: ,. .. :.. .6~traRty.. .. . ;; Price Price Price Price ;TYpe S-3 Asphai (Surface) Tort ' 12;351 $28.50 $352,003.50 $26.66 $329,277.66 'Type S.3 Asphalt'(Levei) Tort i 12;351 $28.50 $352,003.50 $26.66 $329,277.66 kViflling Asphalt Paveme~ 15' S,Y, 6;890. : $0.85 $5,856.50 $0.91 $6,269.90 Pauement Waterproofing Fabric S.Y. 52,030 $0.95 $49,428.50 $1.33 $69,199.90 Traffic Sfipe Skip LF, 41,530 $0.25 $10,382.50 $0.23 $9,551.90 Traffic Stripe Solld L. F_ 172,575 : $0.18 $31,063.50 $0.17 $29,337.75 traffic Stripe SoAd-18" ~.F_ 3130 : $0.63 $189.00 $0.61 $183.00 •'f 8" Slripe-~hemzo EvF. 370 $1.74 $643.80 $1.68 $621.60 .24" Stripe-Themto < l.. F, 805 $2.21 $1,779.05 $2.14 $1,722.70 :Special F+rnt Message Arrow Ea 14 $42.00 $588.00 $40.82 $571.48 Special.PmtMessage "MERGE" Ea 0 $131.25 $0.00 $140.00 $0.00 Specaa€ PrTif Message "OhILY" i~a 0 $94.50 $0.00 $100.00 $0.00 5peciaE Pmt Message "R f R" Ea 0 $26250 $0,00 $275.00 $0.00 ~SpeciaE Pmt Message "SCHQE3t_" Ea 0 $157.50 $0.00 $165.00 $0.00 5peclal.PmtMesge coerib,`Arrow Ea 2' $84.00 $168.00 $81.63 $163.26 S{hecia€ Pmt Message Diartand Ea f7 $210.00 $3,570.00 $204.08 $3,469.36 ' rgfna ntract aunt , Difference ($28,029.68) •~raffic Stripe Solid?12' LF_ 3'IQ>_ $0.58 $214.60 $0.60 $222.00 ;Fraf~rc.SYtipe Sofd24" L.F: 8(}5-; $1.30 $1,046.50 $1.30 $1,046.50 Special Pmt Message Arrow Ea 14 ' $22.00 $308.00 $72.00 $308.00 Special Rrnt Message "fc9ERGE" Ea 0 $77.00 $0.00 $75.00 $0.00 Special Prrit>vfessage "ofV~`f" 1=a 0» $55.00 $0.00 $60.00 $0.00 Specia€ Prnt Message "~ l f2" Ea Q.: $155.00 $0.00 $165.00 $0.00 ~Speciat:PriitMessage 'SCfG7di." Ea ~> $90.00 $0.00 $100.00 $0.00 ~ SpeciaP Pmt Mesge comb: Arrov~r Ea 2 $55.00 $110.00 $55.00 $110.00 SpeciaE Prsit l4Tessage Dratitortci Ea T7 $105.00 $1,785.00 $i 10.00 $1,870.00 "Erdffrc.Stripe Skip L,F. 41,53Q $0.45 $18,688.50 $0.46 $19,103.80 Traffic Stripe 5olld LF. ::. 172,575: $0.40 $69,030.00 $0.40 $69,030.00 Traffic Strlpe Sord-18" LF_ 30Q?: $1.75. $525.00 $1.80 $540.00 ~ ~rg~na['Altemate A~aunt ; ~E.~TAL ... $90,446.50 • • . !0 ~ _ $90,961.80 Difference $515.30 AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. DATE: May 25, 1999 "Investment for the Future" REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT (XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): PURCHASING CHARLES BICHT SUBJECT: Award of bid #99-38 Installation of Park Pavilions BACKGROUND: On February 24, 1999 bids were opened for the installation of park pavilions. One hundred sixty eight vendors were notified (fifty three are minority owned), eleven sets of bid documents were distributed (two are minority owned) and three bids were received (one is minority owned). The Watauga Company was deemed non-responsive due their conditional bid. In the best interest of the county the bid will be split between Adnan Investment and RCD Commercial Construction as stated in the attached memorandum from the Leisure Services Department. FUNDS AVAIL.: 001228-7240-562000-7959 316-7240-562000-7621 316-7240-562000-7616 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of bid #99-38 Installation of Park Pavilions to Adnan Investment and RCD Commercial construction as stated in the attached memorandum and authorize the chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. ,FrIIISSION ACTION: [ APPROVED [ ]DENIED [ ]OTHER: ~~, ."/ v County Attomey:(X) - Originating Dept: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable)_XX_ Dog nderson County Administrator PurchasingMgr.:(X) ;`~. Other: Mgt. & Budget:(X)~~ Other: Eff. 1 /97 H:\WP\AGENDAS\BIDS\99-38 award.wpd LEISURE SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Charlie Bicht, Purchasing Manager Through: Office of Management & Budget %~ ' FROM: Don McLam, Recreation Manages ~'~ DATE: May 3, 1999 RE: Recommendation for Vendor for Bid #99-38 C `_~J~ -., . ` ,~ in._ _t_r ****************************************************************************** After review of the bid packages submitted on the ~"Installation of Pazk Pavilions" and discussions with the attorney's office, it is now our recommendation to award partials of this bid to both Adnan Investment & Development, Inc. and RCD Commercial Construction Corp. We recommend the bid be divided up as follows: Adnan Investment Development Inc. PO Box 517, Jensen Beach, FL 34958 (1) 20x28 Wood Structure w/Metal Roof @ Pepper Park - $7,000 (2) 20x36 Wood Structure w/Metal Roof @ Palm Lake - $7,000 w/public construction bond of $420.......$14,420 RCD Commercial Construction Co. PO Box 7385, Port St. Lucie, FL 34985 (1) 12x12 Metal Pavilion (2) @ White City Park - $6832 (2) 16x16 Metal Pavilion (2) @ White City Pazk - $7620 (3) 20x34 Metal Pavilion (1) @ White City Park - $6800 (4) Reroof Existing 20x28 Shelter @ Pepper Pazk - $2325 w/public construction bond of $471.......$24,048 The fund numbers for this award are: 001228-7240-562000-7959 - $21,723.00 316-7240-562000-7621 - $9,325.00; and 316-7240-562000-7616 - $7,420.00 G:\COMMON\CB\CBPAVINS.WPD ~. ~"~ Z O H J m H «1 M r.1 _V W W CC ~ C wQ tj °o z r o~ J Q ~ t~. ~ Y ~ ~ ~' Q N a~ ~~ Oa z Om ~w Q~ J ~ a '~ ~W ~~ zp ~~./ ~c z C~ C a ~_ m 0 LL W w a W to D V a F- F- a w ~,, a OI Q I~r _ - N ~_ W M N O O ti N M r O ~ ti ~ r N r d0! ER 4f~ 1A ~t3 !A to !R W ~I .•. tQ ~ O w O O ~ ~ ~ to ~ ~ _/ O O O GI cOD N ti O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. .1 ~-- ~ „' ~ ~ H Q J J U ~ H Q a a ~~ _. ~ F- H ~ "` ~O Z ~ ~ ~~ V N ~ ~p ~ t0 J M Q V G J ~ N r t0 ~ ~ O W N~ ~ O a m -~~"~ ~ ~JC~6 cpGy AGENDA REQUEST ~ "INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE" '°~ ORIOP TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 ITEM NO. C-3B! DATE: May 25, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] PRESENTED BY: crno.~,Q r~e~- Donald B. st, P.E. County Engineer SUBJECT: Grant Application -Stormwater Management Program Informational Brochure, Printing and Distribution BACKGROUND: In 1997, the BOCC adopted the Stormwater MSTU as part of the Investment for the Future Program. In developing the County's Stormwater Program an informational brochure has been prepared by our stormwater consultant, Hazen and Sawyer. Staff is proposing to print and mail the brochure to the approximately 45,000 property owners in the unincorporated County with the annual tax notices in November, 1999. The printing company used by the Tax Collector's Office will be used to print and mail the brochure with the tax notices. An additional 5,000 copies will be printed for distribution to the public at meetings such as homeowner association meetings, to residents of neighborhoods where swale maintenance is being done, etc. and to be made available at County offices. The brochure is intended to inform. the public about stormwater management, the impacts of stormwater runoff to the St. Lucie River and Indian River Lagoon, measures that can be taken by individual residents to control stormwater pollution, and the responsibilities of the various agencies involved with stormwater management. The South Florida Water Management District is soliciting applications to provide grant funding for projects through their Water Resources Education Partner Program. A 25% cost-share match is required by the applicant. The total cost for preparing, printing, and mailing the brochure is estimated to be approximately $20,000. The County's 25% match will be approximately $5,000 of which $1,920 was spent previously to prepare the brochure. It is estimated that approximately $3,500 will be the cash amount now required by the County for this project. FUNDS AVAIL.: Account No. 101003-41134-599330-490036 (Stormwater Utility Plan) PREVIOUS ACTION: January 21, 1997, BOCC entered into a contract with Hazen and Sawyer for the Stormwater Management Program Development in the amount of $98,300.00. June 17, 1997, BOCC passed and adopted the Stormwater Management MSTU. ,.. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the attached grant application to be submitted to the South Florida Water Management District for funding the printing and mailing of the Stormwater Management Program informational brochure. The total project cost is estimated to be $20,000. If the project is selected for grant funding, an estimated $3,500 will complete the County's 25% matching funds as required by the District. COMMISSION ACTION: [L]/PPROVED [ ]DENIED [ ]OTHER: [X]County Attorney a (mow [X]Originating Dept. Public Works (]Finance (check for copy only, if applicable) CoordinationlSi na es [X]Mgt. & Budget (X]Co. Eng W [ ]Purchasing [X]Budget Coord. County Administrator St. Lucie County Stormwater Education Brochure submitted by St. Lucie County Stormwater Program Engineering Division, Public Works Department 2nd Floor Annex, Room 229 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 (561) 462-1707 SFWMD Water Resources Education Partner Program submitted to SFWMD Procurement Division B-1 Building, 2nd Floor West 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, FL 33406 Deadline: Friday, May 28, 1999. 2:00 p.m. CiOAR~ O~ COUNTS v' ~~ , ~ ~~~ COMMISSIONERS ~..,/ May 18, 1999 Ms. Linda Greer South Florida Water Management District Attention: Procurement Division B-1 Building, 2nd Floor West 3301 Gun Club Road West Palm Beach, FL 33406 \rrr ~` PU[3LIC WORKS DEPARTMENT RE: Water Resources Education Partner Funding Application Dear Ms. Greer: Please find our FY 1999 application for Water Resources Education Partner Funding enclosed for consideration. It contains our project entitled St. Lucie County Stormwater Education brochure. This project proposes to educate both the new property owners and the current residents about the impacts of Stormwater and who is responsible for managing Stormwater in the County. The authorized persons representing St. Lucie County for this project include: St. Lucie County, County Engineer Don West St. Lucie County, Engineer Intern Mike Wrack This application was prepared without collusion with any other person or entity submitting an application pursuant to the Water Resources Education Partner Funding. Thank you for considering our project for funding. We look forward to your favorable response. Sincerely, ~no.9.~1 - C~~---- Don West, P.E. County Engineer DW: jr Enclosure: One original and nine copies of St. Lucie County application JOHN D. DRUHN, Disrricr No. 1 DOUG COWARD, District No. 2 PAULA A. LEWIS, Disrricr No. ~ FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, Disrricr No. 4 CLIFF DARNES. Disrricr No 5 County Administrator -Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Public Worlss: (561) 462-1485 FAX (561) 462-2362 Division of Engineering: (561) 462-1707 Fox 462-2362 Division of Rood b f3ridge: (561) 462-2511 FAX 462-2363 Division of Solid Waste: (561) 462-1768 FAX 462-6987 TDD (561) 462-1428 '~~./ °'~ St. Lucie County Stormwater Education Brochure Table of Contents Transmittal Letter from St. Lucie Stormwater Program to SFWMD Funding Application Form Attachment A: Detailed Project Description Cost Sharing Proposal Appendix 1, Resolution 97-126, St. Lucie County roadway and drainage MSTU Appendix 2, St. Lucie County Tax Collector memorandum providing support and participation to the project Appendix 3, St. Lucie County stormwater education brochure 9-10 1-6 11 Appendix 4, Capital Budget worksheet for Public Works Department, Line 211 describes dedicated funding source Appendix 5, Project Manager Mike Wrock resume South Florida Water Management District FY2000 Funding Application Form Water Resources Education Partner Program Project Title: St. Lucie County Stormwater Education Brochure Brief Project Description: To educate new property owners and current reside about the impacts of Stormwater and who is responsible for managing stormwater in the county by distributing a stormwater educationbroc by mail with the cotr~y's annual tax statements and at in-person presentations. Target County(ies) or .Multi-county Region(s) FY2Q00 Project Category(ies) ^ District-wide Category ~#3 and Category #5 ^ Miami-Dade ^ Broward ^ Lower East Coast Region ^ Monroe ^ Palm Beach ^ Martin ~St. Lucie ~ Upper East Coast Region Target Audience(s) ^ Polk . ^ Highlands ^Okeechobee ^ Orange O Kissimmee Region ^ Osceola ^ Glades General public/adults and ^ Charlotte ^ Collier ^ Lower West Coast Region Senior Citizens ^ Lee ^ Hendry Applicants Legal Name (Organization Name): Name of Primary Contact: St. Lucie County P+Iike Wrock,F.ngineerin~ Int Applicants Mailing Address: Primary Contacts Mailing Address: St. Lucie County Stormwater Program same Engineering Division, Fublic ~Jorks D pt. 2nd Fl, Rm. 22 , irginia Avenue 2300 V ? g p TelepR~ne fvum~ef~e56~L46~~I~D~56~2 Telephone Number (561 >) 462-170? Fax Number (561) 452-2352 Fax Number (561) 462-2362 E-Mail Address:mikew~stlucieco.gov E-Mail Address: Same Type of Applicant: (Check one) ~ Individual Date of Incorporation: ^ For-Profit Organization _1 Not-for-Profit Organization (If applicable) Government Agency _ Educational Institution State of Incorporation: U Other: is ure ern (From Cost Sharing Proposal) Applicant Other Secured Sources District Funding Requested Total Funding Shares ~ 4, 912.00 $ $ 14, 733.00 ~ 19, 645 00 Percent of Total 25 % % 75 % 100°I° Does the Applicant have funds available and budgeted to pay for the applicant's share of the project cost? Yes No '~' If No, how and when does Applicant propose to secure the necessary funding? Has your organization ever received funding under the Water Resources Education Partner Program (previously the Supplementary Environmental Education Program)? Yes ^ No~ If yes, list most recent funding: Year of funding: Amount: $ Project Title: Year of funding: Amount: $ Project Title: Year of funding: Amount: $ Project Title: The undersigned Applicant has read all of the terms and conditions of the Water Resources Education Partner Program Funding Guidelines and Application, and certifies that all of the information contained within this Application Package is true and correct to the best of its knowledge. The undersigned Applicant also certifies that this Application was prepared without collusion with any other person or entity submitting an Application pursuant to this funding program. Authorized Person's Signature: Date: d~ '~~" ~ Print or Type Name: Donald B. West, P.E. Title: County Engineer m '~n/ SFWMD Water Resources Education Partner Program St. Lucie County Stormwater Education Brochure ATTACHMENT A: DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Project Scope A general description of the proposed project, including anticipated benefits. Explain how the project will address one or more of the categories for FY2000 and how the project is li~zked to the targeted results/orrtconies. On the average, about 54 inches of rain falls on St. Lucie County every year. This rainfall can have four different fates: it can percolate into the groundwater; it is used up by plants and vegetation; it evaporates; or it runs off the land into the receiving waterbodies such as canals, the St. Lucie River or the Indian River Lagoon, both of which are state priority water bodies (IRL SWIM Plan, 1994; IRL Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan, 1996). For many newcomers to St. Lucie County, this elementary concept of what happens to rain after it falls is unknown. As one of the fastest growing counties in Florida, St. Lucie County more than doubled its population between 1980 and 1995, increasing in population from 87,200 to 171,160. Population in the unincorporated area, jumped from 38,115 to 61,765 during the same time period, according to the Future Land Use Section of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan's Evaluation and Appraisal Report dated October 1996. Many of the new residents and homeowners do not understand that Stormwater entering a waterbody can be considered a pollutant to that water body. To help educate both the new property owners and the current residents, the St. Lucie County Stormwater Program, located in the Public Works Department, recently completed a brochure explaining what Stormwater is and who manages it. These key stormwater issues are also District priorities (IRL SWIM Plan, 1994). Utilizing a recently developed four-color brochure, this project proposes to print and distribute 50,000 copies of the Stormwater education brochure to all the property owners (residential, commercial, agricultural etc...) in the unincorporated area of St. Lucie County in an effort to educate present property owners. This proposed project will address SFWMD FY2000 Project Category #3 Increase Education/Outreach regarding Water Quality/Stormwater. It will address this project category with the printing and mailing of the Stormwater education brochure to approximately 45,000 property owners in the unincorporated county area. This brochure covers seven specific areas including, "What is stormwater?" "What are the impacts of un-managed Stormwater runoff?" "Protection of the St. Lucie River and the IRL," Whose responsibility is Stormwater Management?" "Public Education is Key to the Solution," "The Stormwater MSTU Concept," and "What kind of benefit and improvements will I see?" In addition, the proposed project will address SFWMD FY2000 Project Category #5 Increase Water Resource Awareness, Understanding and Action by Senior Citizens as the Stormwater education brochure. This brochure will be mailed and distributed to senior citizens in St. Lucie County. Senior citizens account for nearly 27% of the population in St. Lucie County, according to the St. Lucie County Chamber of Commerce. The remaining 5,000 copies of the brochure will be distributed to the general public and seniors groups during county presentations to homeowner associations and during visits to neighborhoods currently undergoing stormwater maintenance projects such as swale maintenance and other Stormwater enhancements. The most important targeted outcome this project will have is to educate St. Lucie County property ti.rr~ owners about the effects of stormwater and inform this population about the value of the county's relatively new Stormwater Management Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU). This MSTU was passed in 1997 for the sole purpose of levying a tax to fund drainage and stormwater enhancements in the unincorporated area. This proposed project kicks off the St. Lucie County Stormwater Program Education Campaign as the first direct mailer educating property owners about the effects of stormwater and benefits of the MSTU (see Appendix 1). Underway for more than a year, this new program has begun to prioritize stormwater projects to improve flood protection and water quality and promote stormwater enhancement in the county's unincorporated area. By mailing out an educational brochure to all property owners in their tax statements, program managers hope to solicit feedback via a designated phone number provided on the brochure. Specifically, the brochure has been will target and educate St. Lucie County property owners about the seven key areas to stormwater. These areas are referenced above include, "What is stormwater?" "What are the impacts of un-managed stormwater runoff?" "Protection of the St. Lucie River and the IRL," Whose responsibility is stormwater Management?" "Public Education is Key to the Solution," "The stormwater MSTU Concept," and "What kind of benefit and improvements will I see?" By educating the general public and senior population about these urgent stormwater management issues, it is anticipated that these groups will become better informed stewards of both the Indian River Lagoon and St. Lucie River Estuary state priority waterbodies. As better informed stewards these groups will serve valuable roles in sustaining the momentum of public support currently promoting the collection and expenditure of the MSTU and stormwater management for St. Lucie County. Project Plan A description of how the project tivill be implemented within the 12-month time frame. What are the major project elements (tasks) and proposed work schedule? What is tl2e procedure for reporting to the District? What is the proposed payment schedule? What provisions are made to recognize the District's participation in the project? Horv tivill the project be evaluated? Project Tasks, Reporting and Timeframes Task 1 The original artwork, produced by Hazen and Sawyer under contract with the St. Lucie County stormwater Program, will be sent to Moore Business Communication Services for printing. Moore Business Communication Services was selected because it is the same company that prints the county's tax statements for mailing. A total of 50,000 copies will be printed; 45,000 which will be mailed to property owners and 5,000 which will be distributed via in-person presentations to homeowner associations. See description of printing cost listed in Cost Effectiveness Section below. Task 2 The newly printed brochures will be stuffed as an insert in the annual county tax statements for mailing (see Appendix 2). See description of mailing cost listed in Cost Effectiveness Section below. Task 3 A brief report will be provided to SFWMD which will summarize the project and any comments or inquiries received via the designated phone number listed on the brochure (see Project Feedback and Evaluation below.) Tasks Reporting Procedure to Timeframe/Work Schedule District Task 1. Notify District via mail that August 1, 1999 Send original brochure artwork brochure has gone to the to Moore Business printer. Communication Services, the same company that prints the county's tax statements for mailing. Task 2. Notify District via mail that November 1, 1999 Mail brochure out with tax brochure was printed and statements. mailed with tax statements. Task 3. Provide District with a brief February 1, 2000 Complete report and invoice report summarizing the project District in full for the District's and any comments or inquiries contribution to the project. received via phone (see Project Feedback and Evaluation below). Proposed Payment Schedule St. Lucie County Stormwater Program will pay for all costs up front and request a single lump sum payment as the District's contribution to the project for reimbursement of costs expended on the project in February 2000. SFWMD Recognition The SFWMD logo will appear next to the St. Lucie County logo on the back of the educational stormwater education brochure. In addition, a statement will be added explaining the District's contribution to paying for printing and mailing of the brochure to property owners as part of the District's Water Resources Education Partner Program. Furthermore, in the brochure the District is currently recognized as an important entity responsible for stormwater management in St. Lucie County (see brochure text, Appendix 3). Project Feedback and Evaluation By providing a designated phone number on the stormwater education brochure, the program anticipates receiving comments and inquiries from the public about the County's Stormwater Program. These comments and inquiries will be recorded and evaluated to provide valuable feedback to stormwater managers in the program. Cost Effectiveness A description of horv the project provides reasonable service for the money. What are the unit costs? What are the components that make up the unit cost? Does the project utilize existing materials and resources where applicable? What is the Applicant's percentage of cost-share? Hotiv are the components of the cost-share secured and documented? 3 ~/ +../ St. Lucie County Stornlwater Program plans to print 50,000 copies of the two-sided full-color brochure at a total cost of $7,82.00 or $.16 each. Since the St. Lucie County Tax Collector Office has agreed to mail the brochure out with the 1999 tax statements, the mailing cost for the brochure comes to $9,900.00 or $.22 each. This mailing cost is a significant reduction and represents a $4,950.00 savings. Without the partnership of the County Tax Collectors Office, the Stormwater Program would have to assume the cost of mailing the brochures to all property owners at a rate of $.33 each or a total of $14,850.00. In addition, the project utilizes camera-ready, completed, full-color brochure, already developed by consultant Hazen and Sawyer with Stornlwater Program funding (see Appendix 3). This is a savings to the project of $1,920.00. St. Lucie County and SFWMD's Cost Share Breakdown Costs SLC SFWMD Cost of brochure design $1,920.00 Cost of brochure rintina $2,992.00 $4,833.00 Cost of brochure mailing $9,900.00 Total costs $4,912.00 (25%) $14,733.00 (75oIo) Components of Cost-Share Secured This project is listed as an expenditure in the county's Capital Budget Five Year Plan dated July 14, 1998 (see Appendix 4), under line item 211 stormwater Utility Plan. The Stormwater Utility Plan includes the Public Education budget for the county's stormwater Program which is listed at $50,000. This project was originally budgeted under this line item at $1,920.00 and has already been paid out to Hazen and Sawyer for the cost of developing of the brochure. As a part of the County's entire Capital Budget, this budget line item is tracked by the county's general accounting office as well as the County's Stormwater Program for expenditure and outlay. Target Audience(s) What target audiences does the project reach? How many persons are anticipated to be reached through the project. How does the project identify and serve the unique needs of the target audience? This stormwater education brochure project will target and will reach the 45,000 property owners, including commercial, residential and agricultural land owners in the county's unincorporated area. This proposed project is significant, as it will educate these owners about the value, role and importance of an MSTU, as well as the worth of managing stormwater in St. Lucie County. To date, this population has not received public information regarding these issues. This project will serve a valuable role and need in targeting these property owners and sustaining the momentum of public support currently promoting the collection and expenditure MSTU and stormwater management. 4 Geographic Area(s) What county(ies) does t/re project serve? What unique regional needs or geographic features are addressed? This project will serve St. Lucie County. The unique regional needs or geographic features that are specifically addressed includes the education of improving water quality in both the St. Lucie River Estuary and the Indian River Lagoon as well as informing property owners of the value of funding a MSTU for drainage and stormwater enhancement. Experience/Qualifications/References Describe any previous experience with similar projects. Include a description of your knowledge, skills and experience in the field of the proposed project. IMPORTANT: List nco reference who are knowledgeable of the Applicant's experience on similar previous project- include name, address and phone rzr~rraber where references carz be reached during regular business hours. St. Lucie County stormwater Program currently manages a number of grant contracts and cooperative agreements with several agencies and partners. Please see the two examples listed below in the reference sections for greater details of project examples. Two of these Stormwater Program projects include a Pilot Project to Improve Stormwater Discharge Quality Through Canal Structural Modifications with FDEP and the Savannahs State Reserve Ecosystem Management Project with SFWMD. The Pilot Project to Improve Stormtivater Discharge Quality Through Canal Structural Modifications involves the stormwater retrofitting of No. St. Lucie River Water Control District Canal #9 with the construction of a weir structure. This weir and berm structure helps retain stormwater from flowing to the St. Lucie River. The Savannahs State Reserve Ecosystem Management Project involves the retrofitting of a dated subdivision which was platted and constructed prior guidelines for stormwater retention. The project involves the design of retrofitting the subdivision to allow for treatment of stormwater discharges into the Savannahs wetlands and for enhanced flood protection. Project Manager Mike Wrock, County Engineer Intern, brings to this project with a wealth of knowledge regarding stormwater management (see Appendix 5). Mr. Wrock has completed a B.S. in civil engineering from the University of Florida and will be completing his M.S. in coastal engineering from the University of Florida in the near future. During the last three years, Mr. Wrock has worked for the Stormwater Program in the Public Works Department. He is primarily responsible for managing the county's stormwater management program and projects funded by the county's stormwater Municipal Service Tax Unit. During the last six months, Mr. Wrock has managed the development of the county's stormwater education brochure. He will be the designated project manager on this proposed project. Prior to working for the county, Mr. Wrock was an environmental engineer with Camp, Dresser & McKee, Inc. in West Palm where he was primarily responsible for overseeing the development of a solid waste master plan, landfill operations, and the preparation of landfill operation and closure permits. References include: USEPA/FDEP Nonpoint Source Management Grant, No. WM517 Pilot Project to Improve Stormwater Discharge Quality Through Canal Structural Modifications 5 ~' Grant Amount: $95,000.00 FDEP Project Manager: Patti Sanzone, Environmental Specialist Stormwater/Nonpoint Source Management Section FDEP 2600 Blair Stone Road Tallahassee FL 32399-2400 (850) 921-9915 SFWMD Grant Agreement, No. L-8869 Savannahs State Reserve Ecosystem Management Project Grant Amount: $100,000.00 SFWMD Project Manager: Tom Conboy, Engineer Upper East Coast/Kissimmee Planning Division, Planning Department SFWMD 3301 Gun Club Road, P.O. Box 24680 West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680 . (561) 682-6318 6 Cost Sharing Proposal (required) Applicants must use this page to clearly and completely show information and calculations used to determine the cost-share ratio for the proposed project. A minimum match of 25% is required; indirect costs are not allowable. All costs must be itemized within each major category. Cost Item Matching Funds andlor Services Provided by Applicant Other Secured Funding Source(s) Requested . Funding by the District I .Direct Dollars $ !y, 912.00 ~ $ $ 1 ~, ? 33.00 2. In-kind Services $ $ ~ TOTAL SOURCE FUNDING $ 4, 912.00 $ $14~ 733.00 PERCENT OFTOTAL COST ~5 % % 75 GRANDTOTAL $19,545.00 For "Other Secured Funding Sources," list complete name and address of organization(s) below. St. Lucie County Stormwater Education Brochure Appendices Appendix 1, Resolution 97-126, St. Lucie County roadway and drainage MSTU Appendix 2, St. Lucie County Tax Collector memorandum providing support and participation to the project Appendix 3, St. Lucie County stormwater education brochure Appendix 4, Capital Budget worksheet for Public Works Department, Line 211 describes dedicated funding source Appendix 5, Project Manager Mike Wrock resume Appendix 1 Resolution 97-126, St. Lucie County Stormwater Management MSTU '~.-~ RESOLUTION NO. 97-126 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 95-134 KNOWN AS THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY ROADWAY DRAINAGE MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING UNIT RESOLUTION TO CLARIFY THAT SERVICES TO BE FUNDED BY THE UNIT INCLUDE ALL ASPECTS OF STORMWATER MANAGEMENT; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS; CHANGING T'HE NAME OF THE UNIT TO TIIE ST. LUCIE COUNTY STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICES TAXING UNIT; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, on June 20, 1995, the Board of County Commissioners for St. Lucie County, Florida adopted Resolution No. 95-134 and thereby created the St. Lucie County Roadway Drainage Municipal Services Taxing Unit to fund the costs of drainage improvements throughout unincorporated St_ Lucie County through the levy of ad valorem taxes on those properties within the Unit; and WHEREAS, in order to clarify that the projects which may be funded by the Unit include all drainage and stonnwater management related projects and studies and not just those directly related to roadway drainage, it is necessary to amend Resolution No. 95-134. NOW, TI~REFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, that St. Lucie County Resolution No. 95-134 is hereby amended to read as follows: ARTICLE I IlVTRODUCTION SECTION 1.01. DEFINITIONS. When used in this Resolution, the following terms shall have the following meanings, unless the context clearly requires otherwise: "Board" shall mean the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida. "County" shall mean St. Lucie County, a political subdivision of the State of Florida. "Stormwater" shall mean the flow of water which results from, and which occurs fullowing, a rainfall event. 1 ., "Stormwater Management" shall mean the manner by which the County detains, retains, conveys, or treats Stormwater and includes management through roadway drainage. "Stormwater Management Program" shall mean the program implemented by the County to provide Stormwater Management Services. "Stormwater Management Services" shall mean (a) management, administration of the County's Stormwater Management Program; (b) Stormwater Program engineering; (c) constructing, operating, and maintaining the County's capital facilities for Stormwater 1Vlanagement, including extraordinary maintenance; and (d) legal, engineering, and other consultant services. "Unit" shall mean the Stormwater Management Municipal Service Taxing Unit as created by Section 2.01. SECTION 1.02. FINDINGS. It is hereby ascertained, determined and declared that: (A) Pursuant to Article VII, Section 1 of the Florida Constitution, and Sections 125.01 and 125.66, Florida Statutes, the Board has all powers of local self-government to perform county functions and to render services in a manner not inconsistent with general law and such power may be exercised by the enactment of county ordinances. (B) Section 125.01(1)(c~, Florida Statutes, provides legislative authorization for counties to establish a municipal service taxing unit for any part or all of the unincorporated areas within its boundaries, within which may be provided drainage maintenance and improvement (and other essential facilities and municipal services). (C) The purpose of this Resolution is to create the Stormwater Management Municipal Service Taxing Unit for the purpose of providing a funding source for Stormwater Management Services within the Unit. The Board determines that the creation of this municipal service taxing unit is in the public interest and providing Stormwater Management Services is a public purpose. The Board shall determine each year the estimated cost of providing Stormwater Management Services for the ensuing County fiscal year within the boundaries of the unit. (D) The Board hereby determines that the providing of Stormwater Management Services is a municipal services within the meaning of Article VII, Section 9 of the Florida Constitution and Section 125.01(1)(a), Florida Statutes. ARTICLE II STORMWATER MANAGEMENT MUNICIPAL SERVICE TAXING LTNTT SECTIOi'~1 2.01. CREATION. There is hereby created the Stormwater Management 2 c.~..r Municipal Service Taxing Unit pursuant to authority of Section 125.01(1)(c~, Florida Statutes. The boundaries of the Unit shall include the entire unincorporated areas of the County as indicated in the boundaries set forth and described in the Appendix, attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The purpose of the Unit is to provide Stormwater Management Services within the Unit. The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County shall be the governing Board of the Unit. SECT ION 2.02. GOVERNING BOARD POWERS. The Governing Board shall have the power to: A. Levy annually an au valorem tax upon taxable real and personal property within the Unit in the same manner as other county ad valorem taxes are levied; B. Adopt a budget at the same time and in the same manner as the Board prepares and adopts its annual county budget and levies ad valorem taxes as provided by law; C. Separately maintain in a separate account the funds obtained from the levy of the tax. Those funds obtained from the levy of the ad valorem taxes shall be used solely for the purpose of providing Stormwater Management Services within the boundaries of the Unit. D. Appropriate and expend revenue of the Unit. E. Contract to receive and expend money, to sue and be sued, and generally to perform all other acts necessary or incidental to the powers and duties granted by this Resolution. ARTICLE III MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS SECTION 3.01. DECLARATION OF EXCLUSION FROM ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURES ACT. Nothing-contained in this Resolution shall be construed or interpreted to include the Stormwater Management Municipal Service Taxing Unit in the defuution of agency contained in Section 120.52, Florida Statutes, or to otherwise subject the Stormwater Management Municipal Service Taxing Unit to the application of the Administrative Procedures Act, Chapter 120, Florida Statutes. This declaration of intent and exclusion shall apply to all proceedings taken as a result of or pursuant to this Resolution. SECTION 3.02. SEVERABILITY. If any clause, section or provision of this Resolution shall be declared unconstitutional or invalid for any reason or cause, the remaining portion of said Resolution shall be in full force and effect and be valid as if such invalid portion thereof had not been incorporated herein. SECTION 3.03. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall be effective on adoption. 3 After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Gary D. Charles, Sr. AYE Vice Chairman Paula A Lewis _ AYE Commissioner Cliff Barnes AYE Commissioner Ken Sattler NAY Commissioner John D. Bruhn NAY PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 17th day of June, 1997. ATTEST: BOARD OF COI,2~'TYCOMP~IISSIONERS ST. LLJCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA putt' Clerk ~"~OUNT ' t ~Gvt r! .::.s.-~~ 4 BY: ~if'l airman TO FORM AND BY: County • r 1 APPENDIX A BOUNDARIES OF THE ROADWAY DRAINAGE Mi1NICIPAL SERVICE TAXIING UNIT Unincorporated area of St. Lucie County 5 Appendix 2 ~.r St. Lucie County Tax Collector memorandum providing support and participation to the project `~..' ~. ~ ~ ~~~. Tax Collector - St. Lucie County Memorandum To: Donald West, County Engineer Doroth J. Conrad Tax Collecto ~ ~~ From: y , Date: May 12, 1999 Subject: Mailing Stormwater Brochure with 1999 tax notices ~, r` NAY 12 I~~~ ~,_ ,~ ~~ .. .- ~e Permission is granted for mailing of St. Lucie County's Stormwater Brochure with the initial mailing of the 1999 tax notices November 1999. Moore BCS has estimated the weight of the brochure at .3 ounce which will increase our postage costs from 33 cents to 55 cents per parcel. Please use this cost of mailing each brochure at 22 cents for your budget purposes. Our quote of postage does not include any cost for the printing and stuffing of the brochure. Moore BCS will bill us separately for postage and for the cost of your brochure. Once we receive either from Moore BCS we will forward copies to you and request a check from your department . `~-' Appendix 3 ~.r+i St. Lucie County stormwater education brochure V .~ a ---- - Vl k:' ~ ~ __ a 0 0 H a ~ ~ GJ O ~ ~. ~ O ~ a~ ~ 3 y N Gl O b H Q7 ~ [~ U C U H rr~ vJ b~i0 O t~ a • ~ ~ O ~' ~ ~ •~ O a d o 00 ~ ~ a, ~ ,~ O •h '~ d0 ~ o ~ ~ y ~ ~r ~ b ~ Yr L+ .~~i ; ~ ~'' a+ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ O ~ O ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ C C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ • ~ 'd ~ '~ dw O N b > o ~ ~ pip ca b~ A ~ ~ ~, >, b ^ ~ ~ y rr> ~ O W ~~ W b W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cd ~ C ~ ,,~, a~i v o ~pj .b o •~ v v~3~~ ~~.~a~v~~~ ~~b u ~ y cd GL (~, p ~ ~ v w ~ ~ ,~ ~O ~ Y w Q' y y y~ H ~ o ~ ca o> ~ ce ~ N c~~~ w ~ Q ~ ~ W 'Q a ~ C~ ~ W 7~ ~ (yam ~ ~ o 0 3~ ~ a' a •~ °J ° o 0 ra ~ a k ° o •..~ ~ ~ ~ is ~ ° fs. y cn .~ .~ °u ~ ~ 1 0 U ~ F~ ~ 4 't w C °w' w° ~C a i j a~ ~ ~ ~ ee ~ a 1 ~~ ~~~~~ Q ~ O y ~. b ~--1 Uq.'~ pN a'o5 ~,~, ~;, V O ~1 N v~„Ma" N O w y ~, pv r w c~.F ~ ~ ~ b oo w w w o n ., a ~, ~ 5 y~~• w m' ~c n. ~ Q. ~ f~D .may ~ ~ Vv~i ~ w 'b ~ ~~+ ~ ~ ^~ ~' w N v, ° w to ~ ~ Q. R. v' fj' w w O O (D ".-1+ ^ yb .may m~ •r~m m ° w ~~ r~ a.~:r.. w a`*+ fD C ~ w ~ `~ ~ y ~ b ~ ~ y fyD Ac ~ :~~ .y a,po„~a gwo~ p o0 ~p fD ry n' ~ p C' ~' ~. ~ n Oq r LY mow.. ~ w m ~ ~. Ip~-~+ z O ~~f "' ^ ~• ~ b gyp' ~. n ~ ~ m ~ o pq ~ ° ~ fD ~ ° ro o" w ~ o w m °].M ~ a~c~m~ ~ ~ ~ p m ~ 7c' ~ ~' R. 'dr,~. ' O ~ w~ ~ ~ Q' f 6 ~ ~ ~ ~"~ rSh~ `J ~'Y1 y ~ ° ~ G .`r ° ~ ~ ~y. ~~ A ~ b f~0 (~ ° ~o ~. ~ p A ~ n n O y ~ (D ~, a b ~ ~ '° n A y `< ~ of DO w ~ ~. ~ a R ~ ~ b ~ w ~ o ~"t o ~o ~ ~ w o 5'~ O ~ ~op'~v~a°r~ w ~ ~ ~y ~ a.~ L3 w ~ ~ ° ~ w ~ ~ w, w m p. X.. y w o < .~, ~ w~ H o°~ o w O ~'~O ° ~....!" n w y ° ti ^. ~ ~ ~ (p. (D y~a.~~oay:°; w .T H ^ '~ 'S7 (p ~f m o .. m w ~' ~ m `' p w ~' rr ~ .-r n ~~ m ~°° ~; ro ~„ o•~'w ~ m ~ ry~fn w Q' p-~y y ~ ~ ~ y ~y~~ma'a:'~noo~~~~ ~~g~~ o 'gQ.y~~ o~S•o•~ 0 ° L1. ~ m d ~ Cx' (7 '~ ° M ~ ~ ~ M fD ~ ~t O b ~ n ~ Q. O ~ ~ ~~ ~ 'G't n ~ ~. p ~ w ro ;7i ~ ~ '" fin' ~ ~ '~~ ~ ~ O O Q' a. r adC7~.~ ac ~•~ay'~ ~ ^" o n`D # cn ~ m,n °r~," o t e ter' ~ I ^ ~ n&o ~ ~, y ~~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ ~ y ~. x y O w y "~ ~. ~ ry0 ~ N ~ ~ ~~1 ~, fD `G cD ~ ~ a~ n S. m ~ ~ < ,b ~ a, ~ c p ~ m ~ ~. a~ o y „ ~ a o 0 0 ~ ~ ~ b o z~'ao :~ ~ ~ m ~~ y ~ m~~r.p ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ .~ o y ~ ~, w C7 ~ a cr a ~ o ~ ., ~ p R. w m cn m ~ ~ ~ ~ o m' ~' owo p~ ~: ~. ~: a. ~ n C7 N H OC .n .r mow-. ~ '+ y v `~ w oho `C ~ - - - - y w r o 'ti ~ .~ b ~ ~ n ~ ~' ~ _~ w ti ^ O ~ n ~ ~ ~ (~D p ~ ° ~~• c~~o ° y y ~ Vf (~ r1 ~. y ° O' ~ N ~ S.~ ro ~t ~. w ~ ~b y H h ~. y Q. ,., m ~ o a ° ~ o ~ ~' p 0 0 ° N (D Vl w w Q. O a ,~ w ~ a H w A. ~ a '~'1 (~ m ,~ o o ~a ~ ~ ~. w+ n 'b ° 0 0 w a~~ m w Q, a ,~ ., ~ ~ o ~ ~ m w. b y o ~' Vi--. ° `° ~ ~. ro ~ ~ ~ ~" O Y a ~ a, ° 7r O n r, o G.~o w o'n ~~~ ~ ~.~ .~ H H ~. rte} Iw--• Q' p ~ y C. ~ ~ ^ m `~ ~' rt r, m ~ ~ ~... ~ ~. :°< ~ o m ~ w m ~~fDO~~o rG~r w ~ '_". N ~ C b ~' o'~ ~ ~ m b ~ rwY ~ (~ fA _ ~ "I (D ° `~ r1 V1 w n p m n w c~`e o ~' ;~ r~ ~ ~. ~ y ° m ~ ~ H ^ w gyp" „-+m o ~~ ~ o A R ~• H 0 A I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~~ g ~° y ~ ~ fD ~ ~ n 1 ~ ~ ~ m o ;~ • ~ O w w ~ O ~ ~ ~ C• ~ y. ti~ O~~ n n n ^ ;~ o w p w ]. o ~' o ~ ~u m °q ~o `G y ~ ~ ~-s C '17 $~ a' ., n O ~ w m w~ y w `~ w ~' ~ p .0.,, y~ .°y, w y~~ ~. m n rr " Cn n ~!v ~..1 .'~. C ~ (D ~~T. ' ~ ..~~yy ''T' w ryY r~1 Vl ~ ~ w (C ~ c' (D O Vf to O '* ~ m m w o o• ~~b~~~g~? mm~ ti ~ ~ ° H .`~ (D w '~1 y r.. ~ ~ m ~ .~ ~ m' n -`T' n w ~ p- ~ y ., m w ~ir.r' Appendix 4 `r.ri Capital Budget worksheet for Public Works Department, Line 211 describes dedicated funding source 1- J ~ F a N Y ~ Q F- ~ O W ~ Z oa O aZ g' ZI ~3 a p N ('7 Qe Q O p5~ 8aDN(~~N~ 25 O f7 .- Of N ~~~~~~~ 8 r rn is rn <8O ~ ~ N O ? OA A ~ O ~ 8 N I~ 1~ (<p Q c7 O (AO ~ Of O O a0 N f~ < O In 8 O 1~ c0 N S (Np a0 Q A O ? ~O Q f0 r Qe (7 O < 'Q ~ O O N O O l`7 55~~ Ov ~ io COO Q F~'io in~Nrn cO 8~~~gpp~~~Q t~ O N ~ Of ~ ~/ N N t0 fV v c~ c v O~ aAD N O O OWi v a00 1n 7 YI m Q m ~ a N N N 'O ~ a O Q r A F... W W Y O W Q Z m y J o 3 F.. ~ W U } J W CD U a w l}L O p Q p ~(7 ~j ~ O O fD tai fb~ Oa ~(N7 ~ Z05f t0 ~ O v ONi ~ ~ ~ N A Q pO O O pO O N ~ ~ 8 .- ~; O 88O pp 80 008 O O ~ ~ O ~~~i8 ~ O O (7 f7 ~~ O 10~ N N ~~~~ o g g g g h O N ~O N O M O n 0 N aJ (D N ONi Q! N N O b ~ n ~ o ve ~ en ~ ~ ~ ~ O O ~ O h N 8 Q 8 8pQ SS ~ O H (00 N O /~"l O H O N f7 {O A O QO ~ ~ 1A S 0 N '- IfI .- r h Q `gyp N N fp ~p O b v ~ O O 8 O t0 ea ~ 8 ~ o N N ~~ 8 O ~ h ~ ~ r r ~°~8~~~~p~ a M O n~ S~~ N 8 a r .- r vi 0 O O O O O O O N ~88~8° e rn ~ ~ ~ h ti m ~ vi ~ ~ r c~i o 0 e'I N 8~~~~~ o a O qo pQ 8 p G C O~ (O O fn N A N (p N r r N l7 p .o t7 h 0 0 0 0 0 0 O p N N R o en N O f O p O O ~o p p p 0 o° b p o h b 0 0 0 0 0 0 o a a a _ ~ d `~t O eo ~ a . ~~.... O y ~ 88 8 8 8 8 0 N ~ 5 8 8 8 O 8 8 ~ O ........ p . .... ................. ............ 0 0 0 0 0 0 . M.!Y. f.. O C.N.!.. q LL 80 p80 1p 0~ 0 0 ^~ Om N Op p O p O p O O O O O O O O pO In Q ~ 1~ a e a ~O (~ O In ~ ~ ~ f~ c N N A O N N r N N ~ A N ,d,~, O O O O O N Q n 5 ~ O O O O O Q N~ O O ~ p ~ O g 8 S 8 q 0 0 0 0 0 0 O ry Q ~ r 0 (D f~ p p p C0 cD t~ 0 ~ O tp 0 ~ ~ y p y U ip v N A ~ O r M N n c ~ c~ .- a ~ ep ~ M ~ 8 8 8 8 8 N O O O O O S~ i P O O c0 O O O O ~ Y LL ~ O O Op O O N ~ N 8 S O 0 ^ v p 1A O O I pO N O t a7 f~~1 O OOi ~ O? ~ ~ m q two A b w b t 0 0 1 ~ ~ tp a 0 `.j ~ iA b ~ ~o ~ O W K } K ~ } W ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~ Z ~ ~ ~ z ~.Q W ~ a~ W ~ °~oz~ W ~ U ?O ~ Z U OQ ` ~~O ~ ~ N D J ~ W ~C7 w ~~ ~ U v r- QZH~]C m a. ~ Q U O ~ U W ~ W ~ ~~ W 2 ~ ~ O y ~ (A U F. lL ~ ~O W Q OF v71 W H W X Q ~ ~ ( -J ~ W 1 Z~~ d 6~. ~ Q Q ? _~ Z a m ~ O Q~ Z Q W N U d dx XQ W Z W ~ (A = ~ W 7~ S Z ~ W 2 U O~ j Z~~~ H a~ ~L W Q Q 3 XX<<XX f F- Q Q O~ C: Q W ~ J W Q W W~~ Q ~ Y y U O m ~~ r J zzZ~w~~ a g tJ m ~ W o~~~g ~ W ~ Z O w ~<aoaga~ o W ~ ~~ U W Qa=~= ~ O ~ ~n z N~ooo ''~>> W r- S LLZ g ~ F- d~~em3 0~ a -- i wv iv ao¢¢a~-~•-~a- 520~~ >= ° a w ~`-aaa> O 0 0 0a ..i Q e' o W O O ~_-~F- w < a ~ f m ~~ ~ f O ~m ~ 0 ~m ~ Z ~~ W ~OOrn~ F N m Q: ~ ~ U~ J a Z J W a a 2 W a (n m ~ ~r~O~ m a~ (n U7 a~ W W O S W w ~n U Z~~ Z Z Q U a ~ J a~ z a a ~~ ~ d d~~~~ N N r 3 a~ Z ~~ d ( ~ O O Y Z Z ~.' ~"' Z K rn W U c ~ a U U a z 0 0 0~ w~ O x a~ g O r n a w O O~ O g>~ O ~ Q~ z z z Q e- a Z U J J C7 J LL. ~- W U> U~ ~ U U R~ (n (A ~ W U a a Z O > > w J J>~ O O U W Z it J N f7 t 0 ~D t~ 0 0 0 ~- N c7 v N (D 1~ O O O ~ N l'1 Q N (O /~ 0 O O N (") Q 1(7 (O f~ GO ~ ~ •- ~~ •- •- r- ~ ~- N N N N N N N N N N t'1 t7 (") C7 C7 f7 C') t7 M O O t7 Q ~ N ('1 C Y1 (D n O O O Q V V Q Q V Q Q V N~ O d' N F Q _~ N m v r O a O d r t... W W Y O W y Z m Y ~ a 5 Fa-_ 3 w U } J W ~ j > U a LL O a ~ M ~ 8 N ~ ^ ~ J } ~ O LL M Z'. O CI O Q o~ g a ~i F LL Q &' v~ >- LL Z } ~ Q' U LL m J ~ H W 'a O ~ ~ a Z it 11 '^ 08 ~ ~~~~c~c~~~~ c~ ~ a ~,a ~, ~ r Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z N Z N O O c~ ~ M 0000000 00 (~ C7 C7 (7 (~ (7 C7 (~ (~ O C7 ~" ~ r' ~ o m v.=~ci Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z Z 000000000 Z O o i[1 0 N (7 C7 (~ (~ C~ C~ C7 C) U C7 a a Z Z Z Z Z Z 2 Z Z Z Z Z g 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 ( 7 ( 7 C 7 ( 7 c 7 0 0 z z Z z z z Z Z z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 z O N ~ ~ oQQ p~ V ~ QoQ oQ oQ oQ Qo oQ am oQ oQ V t ~ CJ CJ CJ O Dl O C J oQ O R N N N p I n ~y 8 O pp (p ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ O p p ~p p [O aD V ~ IA O t~ Y 7 ~P r N r r r r f0 ~ t0 N N c ~ V N ~ N O I~ f7 88 pQpQ O v ~ pQpQ pQpQ 88 88 88 88 O O O v ~ ~ v ~ v pQ O Qp O Qp v .::::: ~.~~~ C pp N O N 00 p Op p ~A ~A ~ Q? p p pp O pp p p p p p p O 8 N N 0 0~ 0 0 0 ?? ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ N S CD N p S I~ l" ) r'=: ~: m Y'! p p t ~ O O 1~ Q c 7 a0i ~ I ~ N t0 N oQ QQ QQ C J O O QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ QQ 0 0 0 0 0 0 C J O V QQ O QQ O QQ O ~:: :~.~. ? QQ QQ O O QQ C J V oo O O N~ p v v Galllll o 0o 0o oo o o o o 8~~ O O~ 0 0 0 v v ~ .- ~ ~ N ~ N o 8 ao r o 8 r ai :::: m v vi o o 8 8' fa ~ = ri Q S c~ vi ~ .- Q~ Q~ g g g~ ~i 8 8"$ 8 8 ~ ~ ~ g c ~ i g o f ~ c ~ g c i ~ c ~ 5~ 55~~ 55~~ 25 Z5 25 ~ 5~ 5~ 5~ 5Q $ ~ 5~ 5~ 5~ 5~ 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 5~ 25 5 ~ 25 Q 25 ~: "< vmi 5~ 5 ~ 25 2S 5 ~ 25 vCDi S~~ g$~ g g g r- ~ •- ~ g r g ri N vi m g ~ of r Sri :~~: }:: 0 ~ 55~~ 55~~ 55~~ 55~~ 55~~ 55~~ 5~ 5~ 5~ m " ~ 25 ~7S 25 25 25 25 rn 2$ 25 g 25 v r ` a:Ei :: ~ ::. ~ rn r r m P) l7 (p 8 ~ ~() ~ 8 m f7 8 ~ Ql N ~ ((pp ~ c ~ L" ~ ` ? ~ N N ~ fa 0I ~- O (~ f7 N N Q to Q OI f0 r ~ N Ia ~ al ~ : :Si ~:' Mi^ of Q 7 Ql fa 1~ Q < In 5~ 250 R 25 5~ 5,~ Q Q 52 c~ 25252i25~~~ 52 5ov ~ ~ ~ rn~ ~ - - - .. O O o p 8~~ S N B O O Q c m~ f0 ~ N R n N Q al ~ < Q N ~ In N Q l7 t~ Q I~ Q N f'7 N f0 Z 0 0 O O O O v t~ 8 8 8 8 p N (p N O N O/ c~ Of 1~ ~ 1n O N O Y O O ~ 1 ~ 1f) C al N Y1 N Q a0 N N p p ~ f7 ~ m P pp(p~ O E p O N 1~ N N f ~ [a v ~ Q .- c O M c Y N X P1 h ?? ~ O ~~ f7 QQ m N O t ~ ^ 0 8 8 S 8 N N O O N O ~^fl O O O a 0 O O N O m pp c~ pp p p y ~ v v ~ ~ a0 O 8 ~ O 8 ~ fa pD ~ ~ m ta pD i pp ~fl N ~ ~ ~ _ h t0 1p ~ ~ tp ~O N c+i J F q O a 0 ~ m ~ 2 ~ W (7 ~ ~ ~ ~ -' w N a aU 4 ~~ ~¢ s ~ ~ O 2 w W C <w0 p fir- Wa ~O W W~ U W U a F- U Z = d a J U U Z~ U m a w Q W -W- Z w h m ~ o ~ U w 3 a a~ n a v iZw ~~''- ~ ~ ~a ~ a W W W ZO ~ W Q Y U~ Z O g= LL ~ ~ Z F > ~' z F- O U z ~" U~ g a a~ LL F- F- Z J ~ M U D p a ap ~ z~~w(_z7~~Uw~Z ~ ~ tea? w v ~< LL aa~Ud'(7am~(7 ~ U ~ ~~~ W F a p Z ~ F p p a l -- ~ d Z~~ ~ W~~ z d ~ Q W W~~ Q m a a a g o rnaa~aaaz m a w o o~~~~~ z ~n o m ~ ~ o > w aaa x a a -- o F- w U U m ~ U ~. ~ LL U H (7 ~ li ~ f U <n ~ C W U U F- Z ( p 4(7 ~ N N N pp ~ N f00 (a fN0 ~ fQ0 (ND t00 ~a (~D fOa ~ t~ ~ r r ~ ~ ~ f~~ m m m ~ m ~ c0 amD ~ pp OJ al ONi a~i O a~i a~I O^1 ~ a~i 0 N A a N m Y O a n U_ a O a n 0 n 0 ~- J W O o~ a 4 N LL}I A ~ J } F w0 > ~ LL O ~I ._ O QZ a ag a gz 3 o ~< c } ~- c LL O O a rn ~ } LLZ 'V' ti W W Y O 'W V 0 ~ y Z m o 3 ~ 3 a U W J } ~ ~ ~ U a u. ym m d' 0 U O W ~~ J r a O U ~ Z it J ~~~~~~~8~~~~ vS " ~ ai of o 0 0 ~ u~, v~ N O N r~ Q` t'1 f7 N N N N r O Or h ~ f0 O ~ p~ pO aO O O i(7 O! Q f7 O f~l 17 f~J to ~ ~ ~~ M O~ O~ N N N O N 1~ Q^ l7 N N IA N r O O v oO N v u~ v N M M 8N oO N v 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o O O o 0 0 0 o O o O o oQ~ O r ~ ~ ~ n n R o~~~ Q o 0 0 0 0 0 0 2N N ~ ~ ~ c O O~~ N p 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a O) rn N A gO O r O 8v O v g v 8 Q 8 c =}O~tgi V H - W } ~ W ~ _ Ot=-~~U S U F Z W ~ p p ° o tq O ~ a ~' ¢ ~ W -~ J U O p ~ p LL ¢ O i R O W W m ~ i J LL J f" ~ r ¢ ~ I ~ 3 m o o ? J O m m O O 8 v g c d 8 " Q ~ a V.!K g g v 0 O N Q J H 2 W Y ~ W U ~ > O .. ;» >h- Q U m YW ~ oW Uw w~ O ? ~~~ < U o J ~ QpN~ ~ o ? :<> to ::> a ~ ~ ~ _W ~ v w n z a ~ z a m w ~ ¢ ° >.«"1`<` ~ Q W c7 w~ W~ W O~ O O V Z ¢ ~ ~ W~~ ~ ~ <':`- ~ G:~ :::Uis> _ ~"' Z ¢ Q N Z~ > _~ J W Z U ¢mmLL~ c} U Q tL ~ Z Z ~ U U W ~ ~ } ~C7 p W Z J :~:~: W ;:: W U N W W Z N Fa- LL O~ m l1! ~~ O ~ ~ vJ Z W Z Q U (A > ¢ W LL ¢ ~ ~ W m 0 O N m > Q :_: W U ~~ ~ O O~ U U O Q r- O > O m w w~l nrco y W ~ Z y p O ~~ O m Q N W 0 rn w r ° ~- W ~ j ~ w ~ i ~_< >` d :;:> J w W m mw~w0°>~O => m> m~¢ O w O LL W O U >F ~- O ~ ~ pwww0 O h m y° w > (7 LL O m w m z z z W n Y <o> a W ~o~o~~;}°~°°zooo w w w w ~ m ¢ O ~ Q O JW~~W ~>m°Wao~°mo~333~ w t- Z O r ~ o W <J ~ W m ~ >>>> = Q d O m> > ¢a¢a~~OgmZaoU~ ~ a, ~ p p Z W W m W rn ~ O m~ 0 7 Z O U 0 Y 0 O ~wg`~~~zoi¢Ua~¢~agc~o-' ~r ¢ a a a W D z z Z z ~ ~ ~ } ~ O ~ ¢ O ~ °° ~ ~ ~ m W w = Z Z m ~ ~ ~ W ~ O C ¢ ~ ~ p ¢ O ~ - 1 ¢¢¢¢ W 7 m ~ d Z~ O ~ W /1 ~~~~ W° H¢ j Y W LL O W m d ...i ~ f ~ O U m %~ D '' m O O O O Y~ r Y !A U j W C7 d LL Q Z ~ (7 --1 d m U Z Y (7 Y (9 ~ W d° Y lJi. O Q 2 O U_ 80 O 8: PP O~ O O O O O ~ N c7 Q~~ r eD O1 O W N N N th Q ~fl (D r~ rn 0 N c'1 Q 1A fD r ap O O .- N (7 R~ (O r c0 N N N N N N N N l7 f7 (h (7 th (h M [7 f7 f'7 ? Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q X 0 0 V ~A ~ Q Q N J ~- J U ~ ~ Q a ~ g ~ J W} ~ O LL O Z g N o ~. n S III 8 QII O ~ Q M } ~ ° LL O 0 n «n,.t;.« _o ~ rn~ } LLZ } ~ Q, ~ Q O U >L }~ LL W W N Y O W ~ N Z m J 0 a ~ 3 V } J w m U a u. r H a O U ~ w Z at J O ~ O '7 O N QO, v r3 O Q 8< oO N Q O v ~~.w+~ Z Z Z O V CJ O J V V CJ O O C.l O O O O O U p pp~~ M Z Z Z r iA a 0 O 0 ~ ~ 1~0 0 f` m N O O O o Z O U z O iA O O O O O O O_ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1A 10 17 r Q 111 N p N N Y7 1A p O O ~p ~ n ~ p1 N tG t~ 1A ~! ^ O ~ ~ f° O f~ 1~ 117 O O O O ~ Q ~ ~ 8 .- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q ~ 8 N 10A p~ S O O O O v p p N p p 1A 8 r- O wx O O 8 O O O O O O O O O O O O O O ~~1Qi° 1nc°roi~~Pi'~ m n c%1 C.] O CJ V V ~'I O O O ~7 O j c0 c° aD cD G. v I O O O O O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ v 8 8 8 O 8 O O O O O m °~ m° °w 0w 8 8 8 O 8 2$00 25 25 25 000252525252525252525 25 25 0 0 1Q O O O O O O O O C O O O O O p p p N ~[] 8 o O o N N O 1n In O O O 8 8o O O~ O O~ t vp ~ t OV O c~p ~ O~ O Op p Op tV N ~ ~ ` ~ 1t7 ~ O t0 m n 47 ~ (° (O l'7 ~ aOD t° a0 ~ to 1~ Q °1 ` ~ °1 '7 v ~ ~ O c~1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~Q~~~~~~~~0~ o ~~~~~ ~ vi~oi~ocoocovi o c~'o0ooai ~ a ~ n ~ n m ao ao W 111 n v v .- ~ ~ r1 a O 8 N QJ ~ J w ~ p w a J» ¢ p Z } ~ a U = ¢ Z pp s ~U~w atryi uyw rU_-~U ~ z w Z Zg¢a a~~-~~pOU ~ p w U j~ Z j W~ O ~ n LL 0 ~ F w~ O Q U? ~ p a w ~ p~¢w Y~ V ~cw7~ae ~ataaf-U W p~-p~ ~ >- ~~¢ ~ Sip Qw ~~?O~~ww°~~oe<ou~~1"'n Q ~ m~~ W a J ~g J ~Z~°~W~~WwWw~~W Q ~ &~~}~ Q D jww O ~~ O j~~~w~==v~Q~Q~~QQFOC9 p uLL. W p~~~ ~ Q J Q O (D Q Z m J W~} p~~~ Z W W W J (D ¢ m p~~ (~ U OF (D ~ u~iaa of ~~ u7i UwU~~m~u0iupi000vwi~0 vi H- ~~~Y~ ~ ~ N (") 'at to fD r N~ O ~ N f7 Q Y1 f° n OD ~ O ~ N C) ^ h 1p f~ ~~ O N 17 V 11'1 b r m~ N 1'7 1n N N an Y7 1() N N N t0 f0 f° ~° 1p 10 <O c0 t0 1p I~ r n n~ n r r n r a0 m m c0 m m W W m N~~ O O m 0 0 a m Y O a rn U 0 K H a a v v 7 ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ m~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~mQ~~°8 '- ~ ~S~ Q ~~ a ~ g q N uu ++ ^ } ~ ~ C J O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ {J O LL p t9 o tD p O V A O 8O 1 ~ p n Ol N ~ ~ {~l ~ ~ to ~ f7 O 8V O8 N (V (.J C] pO ~ 1n O O V O a 5~ 25 5~ 2i 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 ~i i° g g R g ° g ~ N ~ P I o a 5~ 25 5~ ti $~ 25 5~ 25 ~ 5~ 25 RR 5 ~ 25 25 S ~ ~ ~ 8 8 S 8 8~ 25 °g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 8 8 8~ ~ g a LS 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 ZS ~i ~i g g g g g~ M } ~ ~ ~ ~ v v ~ O A v ~ O p v O v ~ p a LL O ~ m a pp a p ~ Owl 1A ~? M N~ 8 '- ~ X 8 8 ~ pv ovo O N {4MY.tr:itK!IX<Kh :!H.trf.C ppj ~ } :r}Y.KN.{OtS{44:{{{hY• ~{M:i!Stt:S:-0OWKGMOCMCtOhtl4:0NttKd O O htlM.4 :'AN9Kd90t8000WA0M8NK{h AC80CKSK{{:~tHi.!{M:{•:{[KiiF.!t• :i:!{?v.t{ O O O O O O O N N L{-::.{-iY.vvr{{{xC:4: O O O 8 :{F{K<{C{4::ri:8K!K-0C:.trr {4 O O ? V 8 LL Z fp`1 8 ~~ ~ ~ N m Q O N p O N S to v p c ~ S O 8 O fp 8 8 8 8 ~ O O O O I~ O O c Q O O O 8 O O f~ A Y n 2 ~ O o to p (D ~ b ~ ~ Q N ~ ~ Q o o t0 8 pp fU IIOJ 8 In Y W O O f~ O W O O t LL~ a00 o a0 O 1[7 O O< ~~ m O v h ~ Opi fp0 8 O O ~~ O 8 OO 1n 8~ i 8 '"' W W ~ r a o zz z ~ J~taO`~ J U U W W w w V LL Q W Z a tQ7 (a7 ~ ~' ~ O W Z? W •„~ 1- Q U Q Z ~ Z W Z Z W ~~ Z ~ ~ z a ~ W ~ W ~~ ~ ~° a°° U J> J O ~ Ua ~ ~ ~ ~ a~~w W Q$LL~~ ~? (a~ m y ZQ Q Q ?~ J Q Q Z~~~ O~ Q ~ J~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W~ww~wac~j Zz~ Q ~ ~ U m ~ ~ J f- ~ Z U Z + Q Z J U ~~ Q H Q w ~ J } ~ ~ o Z wW~zz~W` '-~° ~ a °'=°w o w~? o . m w ,- Q = W ~ Q2 ~-°~aa~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ wr-- ~ U ~ _~~ U a t i U' w ai O ~ ~ ~~ ~~ h m zo~ ai O~~ ~ Z a rn rn~ rn rn rn g o 0 0 0 0 `S o 0 0 0 ~ N c~ v~ ~_ r_ m_ rn o rv n ~ N N N r m ~~„ ~ in oNi cam-, J '"' ~ ~ '- ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 m m d N m Y O S a_ U rn rn U O H Q ~_ d O 7 D /- J Q O d' a ~ g W N r ^ d; J > IQ-~ ~ Q LL O ~ O aZa ~7 a o Z a gz g a o rn N O a 0 a n W TWT 'i'^ vI Y O H W Z m o 5 ~ 3 U } n. ~ W a>> U a LL O1 N 0 } LL Z } ~ ~ ~ IiU ~ Q LL ~I) ~ U /Q- w a ~ U ~ W Z u J tD N O 0 0 l'7 f7 V [~~1 c m v< v v v o No (7 W r N N N O Ol O O 1f7 ~~ to Q f~ N O M N N rl in aD N N to f` Q 11'1 N LLl O N (O W 1(1 O C7 v c7 v tD v< v v v 1(7 lM a0 ~ 1f7 p N N O~ O O N O~ N N n Q 1001 N IN N N ( O(pp aD 1n O M C7 Q t7 'C 0 7 Q ~f '7 < 1n l") a~ .- to O N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 f 0 0 0 O N (O 1D N< n N O1 i7 N /n ah N W CO 1n N O N In n Q IA N 1A N N t0 l7 Q M Q tp Q Q Q Q Q In O f7 00 _ N O N 1n -..aw O O 10 8888 8 aO v 1 1n v v v v O 1ff X71 1A 1A 1A i[ o ~ r _ ~ N m 8 Obi 0 O 8 ~ m ~ m ~ ~ 7 ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W m ~ ~ ~ ~ O E- o Oa ~Ww~u)~w~f-~vmi~ v ~ Z W~ Q a Z la- ~~ O W~~~ W O ? v p m g G W m W O W~ W Q} U W a O~ ~ Z~ p~ N~~~~ O m a ti m ~z~zooo~~o~~$aaW~ ~ QQ ~ °_ a o Y ~ z ~ o ~ ~n ~ LL _ ~pp m ~ ~ Qy 17 M t7 M M M Q Q Q Q R V V V Q C 1A O lN!) N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N m s W A a N Q1 3 Y O a a m 0 •- f- a a m '~./ Appendix 5 Project Manager Mike Wrock resume r ~ J ~ w V MIKE J. WROCK ST. LUCIE COUNTY ENGINEERING DIVISION PHONE: (561) 462-1191 Registered State of Florida Engineer in Training, #490ET282 EDUCATION: University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida Master of Science, Coastal Engineering (expected) 1991-present, Grade Point Average: 3.28/4.0 University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida Bachelor of Science, Civil Engineering 1986-1989, Grade Point Average: 3.11 /4.0 Palm Beach Junior College, Lake Worth, Florida 1985-1986, Grade Point Average: 3.64/4.0 EXPERIENCE: Engineer Intern St. Lucie County Engineering Division, 1 /95-present Primary responsibility is managing the County's Stormwater Management Program. Graduate Research Assistant University of Florida, Dept. of Coastal Engineering, 10/92-1/94 Performed laboratory investigations of a phenomenon known as a "squall-line surge", which is an unusually large single water wave generated by a moving atmospheric pressure disturbance. Environmental Engineer Camp Dresser & McKee Inc., West Palm Beach, Florida, 1/90-6/91 Responsibilities included the development of a solid waste master plan, a landfill operations study, preparation of landfill operation and closure permits, field engineer during construction of a landfill liner base, hydraulic analyses for a wastewater treatment plant re-use system, and preparation of control and instrumentation data for a wastewater treatment plant operations manual. ASSOCIATIONS: American Society of Civil Engineers American Shore and Beach Preservation Association Florida Engineering Society `/ AGENDA REQUEST `~ ITEM NO. C_4 DATE: May 25, 1999 REGULAR[] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): C-=~'='?t~' A orney Donald G. Cole Property Acquisition Manager SUBJECT: Indrio North Savannas/FCT Project #95-052-P56 Amendment II GRANT AWARD AGREEMENT BA ,KGROUND: See attached memorandum FTINDS AVAIL.ABT.E• State type & No. of transaction Qt N/A): N/A P FVIO A .TION: On August 1, 1995, the Board authorized submission of the Florida Communities Trust Grant Application for 50% matching funds. On March 26, 1996 the Board approved the Conceptual Approval Agreement with Florida Communities Trust for this project. On October 21, 1997, the Board approved the Grant Award Agreement and it was recorded in O. R. Book 1116, Page 1722 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County on December 19, 1997. On September 15, 1998, the Board approved Amendment I to the Grant Award Agreement and it was recorded in O. R. Book 1192, Page 2683 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County on December 28, 1998. RF.('OMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Amendment II to the Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Amendment and direct staff to record the document in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. APPROVED [ ]DENIED [ ]OTHER: D ug s M. Anderson County Administrator RPv~ew and A~provals,..~ (X]County Attorney: ~~ [X]Management & Budget/ [X]Originating Dept: .~~ [X]Leisure Serv: ( ]Finance: (check for copy only, if applicable) [ ] Purchasing _ [X]Community Dev~ Effective 5/96 ~. ~ C - ~~ ~ PROPERTY ACQUISITION DIVISION TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: Donald G. Cole, Property Acquisition Manager DATE: May 25, 1999 SUBJECT: Indrio North Savannas FCT Project #95-052-P56 Amendment II -Grant Award Agreement BACKGROiTND: Attached to this memorandum is a copy of Amendment II of the Grant Award Agreement between the Florida Communities Trust (FCT) and St. Lucie County pertaining to the Indrio North Savannas Project. The Amendment imposes the conditions governing the use of the property on the 51 parcels attached as Exhibit "A-II" . According to the terms of the Conceptual Approval Agreement, dated April 16, 1996, Florida Communities Trust will reimburse the County for fifty percent (50%) of the purchase price of all the parcels acquired plus fifty percent (50%) of the acquisition expenses. RF C OMMENDATION/CONCL.I1_SI ON Staff recommends that the Board approve Amendment II to the Agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the Amendment and direct staff to record the document in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. Respectfully submitted, Donald G. Cole, Property Acquisition Manager CC: County Administrator Counry Attorney Community Development Director Leisure Services Director Management & Budget Manager This instrument prepared by: Ann J. Wild Florida Communities Trust Department of Community Affairs 2555 Shumard Oak Blvd. Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 FCT CONTRACT# FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST P5A AWARD# 95-052-P56 AMENDMENT II GRANT AWARD AGREEMENT THIS AMENDMENT II to the GRANT AWARD AGREEMENT is entered into this _ day of , 1999, by and between the FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST ("FCT"), a nonregulatory agency within the State of Florida Department of Community Affairs, and ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida ("FCT Recipient"), in order to impose terms, conditions, and restrictions on the use of the proceeds of certain bonds, hereinafter described, and the lands acquired with such proceeds and as described in Exhibit "A.I" attached hereto and made a part hereof ("Project Site"), as shall be necessary to ensure compliance with applicable Florida Law and federal income tax law and to otherwise implement provisions of Chapters 259, 375 and 380, Florida Statutes. WHEREAS, FCT and FCT Recipient entered into a Grant Award Agreement dated November 14, 1997, and recorded December 19, 1997, in Official Records Book 1116, page 1722, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, at the time of the acquisition of the Smith parcel of the Project Site, as described in Exhibit "A" to the Grant Award Agreement; WHEREAS, FCT and FCT Recipient entered into Amendment I to the Grant Award Agreement dated October 9, 1998, and recorded December 28, 1998, in Official Records Book 1192, page 2683, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, at the time of the acquisition of 75 additional parcels of the Project Site, as described in Exhibit "A.1" to Amendment I to the Grant Award Agreement; WHEREAS, FCT has approved the terms under which 51 additional parcels of the Project Site were acquired by the FCT Recipient and these 51 parcels of the Project Site shall be subject to such covenants and restrictions as are sufficient to ensure that the use of the Project Site at all times complies with Section 375.051, Florida Statutes and Section 9, Article XII of the State Constitution and such covenants and restrictions shall contain GAA\95-052-P56 AMENDII\4-30-99 1 Ord clauses providing for the conveyance of title to the Project Site to the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust Fund upon the failure of the FCT Recipient to use the Project Site acquired thereby for such purposes; and WHEREAS, such covenants and restrictions shall be imposed by an agreement which shall describe with particularity the real property which is subject to the agreement and shall be recorded in the county in which the real property is located; and WHEREAS, General Conditions paragraph 3 of the Grant Award Agreement states that this Agreement may be amended at any time. Any amendment must be set forth in a written instrument and agreed to by both the FCT Recipient and FCT; WHEREAS, the purpose of this Amendment is to impose the covenants and restrictions of the Grant Award Agreement on the 51 additional parcels of the Project Site, in addition to the Smith and 75 parcels of the Project Site, subsequent to reimbursement of FCT Recipient acquisition costs from FCT Preservation 2000 Bond Proceeds. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and undertakings set forth herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, FCT and FCT Recipient do hereby contract and agree as follows: The Grant Award Agreement dated November 14, 1997, and recorded December 19, 1997, in Official Records Book 1116, page 1722, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, as amended by Amendment I dated October 9, 1998, and recorded December 28, 1998, in Official Records Book 1192, page 2683, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, is hereby amended to impose the terms, covenants and restrictions of the Grant Award Agreement on 51 additional parcels of the Project Site as described in Exhibit "A.II" attached hereto, in addition to the Smith and 75 parcels of the Project Site as described in -- Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "A.I" to the Grant Award Agreement, as amended. This Amendment II to the Grant Award Agreement, including Exhibit "A.II.", Amendment I to the Grant Award Agreement, including Exhibit "A.I.", and the Grant Award Agreement, including Exhibit "A", embody the entire agreement between the parties. GAA\95-052-P56 AMENDII\4-30-99 2 r.r+~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have duly executed this Agreement. Witness: ST. LUCIE COUNTY Witness Name: Witness Name: BY•_ Its Date: Attest: Clerk Accepted as to Legal Form and Sufficiency: Date: STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 1999, by as He\She is personally known to me. Notary Public Print Name: Commission No. My Commission Expires: GAA\95-052-P56 AMENDII\4-30-99 3 '~/ ~.r~ FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST Witness Name: Steven M. Seibert, Chair Witness Name: Date: Accepted as to Legal Form and Sufficiency: Ann J. Wild, Trust Counsel Date• STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF LEON The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of , 1999, by STEVEN M. SEIBERT, as Chair of the Florida Communities Trust. He is personally known to me. Notary Public Print Name: Commission No. My Commission Expires: GAA\95-052-P56 AMENDII\4-30-99 4 Exhibit "A.II." Amendment II to Grant Award Agreement The North of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 LESS an easement of the West 60 feet, lying and being in Section 17, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North ~ of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying in Section 17, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South ~ of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South ~ of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The East 50 feet of the West 80 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 Subject to an easement over the South 40 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The East 50 feet of the West 130 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 Subject to an easement over the South 40 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. GAA\95-052-P56 AMENDII\4-30-99 5 AND The East 50 feet of the West 180 feet of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 Subject to an easement over the South 40 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 less the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North ~ of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS an easement over the West 30 feet and the North 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND -- The South ~ of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet and the South 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. GAA\95-052-P56 AMENDII\4-30-99 6 AND The North ~ of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North ~ of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast, 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North ~ of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet and LESS the South 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North ~ of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the North 30 feet and the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND - The South of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40'East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North ~ of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. GAA\95-052-P56 AMENDII\4-30-99 ~ AND The South ~ of the Southeast easement of th 7, Township 34 Florida. AND \./'~ the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 subject to an e East 30 feet, lying and being in Section South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, The North of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 subject to an easement of the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South ~ of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South ~ of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet and LESS the South 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North ; of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 subject to an easement of the East 30 feet and the North 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St'. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South ; of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4, of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. GAA\95-052-P56 AMENDII\4-30=99 8 AND The South ~ of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North ~ of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South ~ of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet and LESS the South 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South ~ of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of -- the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South i of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. GAA\95-052-P56 AMENDII\4-30-99 9 AND `i.r~ The North '~ of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the East 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The East 50 feet of the West 200 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 subject to an easement over the South 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The East 50 feet of the West 250 feet of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 subject to an easement over the South 40 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the West 250 feet and subject to an easement over the East 30 feet and the South 40 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South ~ of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. GAA\95-052-P56 AMENDII\4-30-99 10 ~'"" `+/ AND The South ~ of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South ~ of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North ~ of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South ~ of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North ~ of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 -- feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North ~ of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 18, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. GAA\95-052-P56 AMENDII\4-30-99 11 AND The North of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North ~ of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 subject to an easement of the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South ~ of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North ~ of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North i of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet and LESS the North 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND -- The North ~ of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND 1 The South ~ of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the South 30 feet and LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. GAA\95-052-P56 AMENDII\4-30-99 12 AND The South ~ of the Northwest 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND THE South ~ of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The North ~ of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, lying and being in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. AND The South ~ of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of the Northeast 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 LESS the West 30 feet, in Section 7, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. TOGETHER WITH all right, title or interest Recipient may have, or claim to have, in and to any access roads or easements, and the underlying titles to same, which are, or may be appurtenant to the real property hereby conveyed, and which access roads or easements are located in the East 3/4 of the South ~ of Section 7, the East 3/4 of the North ~ of Section 18, and the West 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 17, all being in Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. GAA\95-052-P56 AMENDII\4-30-99 13 ~ ~`- AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. DATE: May 25, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] TO: Board of County Commissioners PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT):County Attorney Heather Young Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Bob Gladwin Baseball Complex -First Amendment to March 9, 1999 Contract with St. Lucie Mural Society BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum CA 99-671. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Account No. 104-7240-582000-700 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment to the March 9, 1999 contract with the St. Lucie Mural Society, and authorize the chairman to sign the amendment. COMMISSION ACTION: [ APPROVED [ ]DENIED [ ]OTHER: County Attorney: ~-~ Originating Dep[. Douglas Anderson COl Review and Approvals Management & Budget: Other: Administrator Purchasing: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable): INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 99-671 DATE: May 18, 1999 ~_ y~~ SUBJECT: Bob Gladwin Baseball Complex -First Amendment to March 9, 1999 Contract with St. Lucie Mural Society BACKGROUND: On March 9, 1999, the County entered into a contract with the St. Lucie Mural Society to install a baseball theme mural at the Bob Gladwin Baseball Complex in Fort Pierce. The contract provided for the project to be completed on or before May 31, 1999. Due to delays in the availability of the artist selected for the Project, the Leisure Services Department is proposing that the completion date be extended to June 30, 1999. A copy of a proposed first amendment to the March 9, 1999 contract providing for such extension is attached to this memorandum. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed amendment to the March 9, 1999 contract with the St. Lucie Mural Society, and authorize the chairman to sign the amendment. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Heather Young Assistant County Attorney HY/ Copies to: County Administrator Leisure Services Director Finance Director Recreation Manager Contracts Coordinator e FIRST AMENDMENT TO MARCH 9, 1999 CONTRACT THIS FIRST AMENDMENT is dated this day of 1999, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and ST. LUCIE MURAL SOCIETY, hereinafter referred to as the "Mural Society". WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, on March 9, 1999, the parties entered into a Contract wherein the Mural Society agreed to install a baseball theme mural at the Bob Gladwin Baseball Complex in Fort Pierce, Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "Project"; and, WHEREAS, the Contract provided for the Project to be completed on or before May 31 1999; and, WHEREAS, the parties desire to extend the for completion of the Project to June 30, 1999; and, NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree to amend the Contract as follows: 1. Paragraph 3 of the Contract shall be amended to read as follows: 3. TIME OF PERFORMANCE The Mural Society shall guarantee completion of the Contract on or before June 30, 1999, subject to extension due to inclement weather upon prior approval of the County Project Manager. The work shall be conducted in such a manner and with sufficient labor, materials, tools, and equipment necessary to complete the work within the time limit set forth in the Contract. Should the organization of the Mural Society, or its management, or the manner of carrying on the work be manifestly incompetent, or inadequate to do the work specified within the stated time, then the County shall have the right to take charge of the work and finish it and provide the labor, materials and equipment necessary to complete the work as planned within the required time and to charge the cost of all such work against the Mural Society and his, or its Surety shall be held responsible therefore. The Mural Society fully understands and agrees that the County shall not pay for any obligation or expenditure made by the Mural Society prior to the effective date of this Contract, unless the County authorizes such payment in writing. 3. All other terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in full force 1 and effect. '~..~'` IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this First Amendment on the date first above written. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS BY: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: ST. LUCIE MURAL SOCIETY g: \atty\agreemnt\ 1 a-mural.wpd BY: NAME: TITLE: 2 r+ ~ ~~ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 1, I "~ DATE: May 2 5, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Children's Environmental Learning Center -Contract with Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Contract with Paul Jacquin 8v Sons, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to sign the Contract. CO MISSION ACTION: [ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: //~}";'~, Review and Approvals County Attorney: Q Management & Budget Originating Dept. Leisure Svcs. Dir. Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable~)~~ ",~/ ~ Purchasing: Env. Lands Spec. Eff. 5/96 County Administrator INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 99-675 DATE: May 18, 1999 SUBJECT: Children's Environmental Learning Center -Contract with Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. BACKGROUND: On February 16, 1999, the Board awarded Bid No. 98-76 for the construction of the Children's Environmental Learning Center to the low bidder, Paui Jacquin 8a Sons, Inc. in the amount of six hundred forty four thousand five hundred ninety-eight and 0/100 ($644,598.00) dollars. Attached to this memorandum is a copy of a proposed contract between the County and Jacquin. As directed by the Board, the contract includes a provision providing for a credit against the contract price in the event materials are donated. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Contract with Paui Jacquin -- & Sons, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to sign the Contract. Resp tfuUy submitted, n / ^~ ~ ~ ~ ,~. Daniel S. McIntyyre County Attorney DSM/caf Attachment CONTRACT W..r~ THIS CONTRACT, made this ~ day of ~~/~- ~ 19~, between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a Political Subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter called the "COUNTY", and PAUL JACQUIN & SONS, INC., or his, its or their successors, executors, administrators, and assigns hereinafter called the "CONTRACTOR": WITNESSETH: 1. PURPOSE That Contractor agrees with County, for the consideration herein mentioned, at his, its or their own proper cost and expense to do all the Work and furnish all the materials, equipment, supplies, and labor necessary to carry out this Contract in the manner and to the full extent as set forth in the Contract Documents, and to the satisfaction of the duly authorized representatives of St. Lucie County, who shall have at all times full opportunity to inspect the materials to be furnished and the Work to be done under this Contract. 2. GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF WORK It is agreed that the Work to be done under this Contract is: Construction of the Children's Environmental Learning Center as per Bid No. 98- 76. 3. PROJECT MANAGER The Project Manager for the County is Michael burette at 561) 462-1434. The Project Manager for the Contractor is //~ / ~ ~ at mss- ~~5~ The parties shall direct all matters arising in connection with the performance of this Contract, other than invoices and notices, to the attention of the Project Managers for attempted resolution or action. The Project Managers shall be responsible for overall resolution or action. The Project Managers shall G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. L=aRNING CTR - 1 fir'' be responsible for overall coordination and oversight relating to the performance of this Contract. 4. CONTRACT DOCUMENTS The Contract Documents which comprise the Contract between the County and the Contractor are attached hereto and made part hereof and consist of the following: A. This Contract, consisting of pages 1 through 18 inclusive. B. Contractor's Bid and Bid Bonds, consisting of 3 pages. C. Bid Documents, consisting of: Invitation to Bid and Instructions to bidders. General Conditions, pages 1 to 43, inclusive. Special Conditions, pages N/A to N/A, inclusive. Technical Provisions, Divisions 01-16. D. Drawings No. C 1 through E5, as listed on the attached Exhibit A. E. Addenda No. 1 through 4. F. Public Construction Bond, which shall be provided to the County by the Contractor, along with the return of an executed copy of this Contract. - G. Insurance Certificates which shall be provided by the Contractor, along with the return of an executed copy of this Contract. H. Any Modifications, including change orders, duly delivered after execution of this Contract. I. Addenda No. 5 reflecting deducts to the contract. Except for duly authorized and executed Modifications including but not limited to change orders and contract amendments, any conflict between the G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. LEARNING CTR - 2 ~ ~,r/ terms and conditions of this Contract and the terms and conditions of any of the other contract documents shall be interpreted in favor of this Contract. 5. PERFORMANCE GUARANTY That Contractor guarantees to repair, replace or otherwise make good to the satisfaction of the County any defect in workmanship or material appearing in the Work; and further guarantees the successful performance of the Work for the service intended. Neither inspection nor payment, including final payment, by the County shall relieve the Contractor from his or its obligations to do and complete the Work in accordance with this Contract. If the County deems it inexpedient to require the Contractor to correct deficient or defective Work, an equitable deduction from the contract price shall be made therefore or in the alternative, if the expense incurred by the County to correct deficient or defective Work exceeds the unpaid balance on this Contract, the Contractor shall pay the difference to the County. The liability of the Contractor and its surety or sureties for such payment is joint and several. 6. TIME OF PERFORMANCE /DELAYS AND EXTENSIONS OF TIME The Contractor shall begin work within ten (10) calendar days after the signing, execution and delivery of written notice to proceed, and shall guarantee completion of the Contract on or before 240 calendar days from the date of notice to proceed. Commencement of the Work by the Contractor shall be deemed a waiver of this notice. The Work shall be conducted in such a manner and with sufficient labor, materials, tools, and equipment necessary to complete the Work within the time limit set forth in the Contract. In the event the construction schedule as set forth in the Contract documents is changed, the Contractor shall notify the County, in writing, of the change in schedule. Such schedule change - shall not, however, extend the time for completion unless approved by the County in writing. In the sole opinion of the County, should the organization of the Contractor, or its management, or the manner of carrying on the Work be manifestly incompetent, or inadequate to do the Work specified within the stated time, then the County shall have the right to take charge of the Work and finish it and provide the labor, materials and equipment necessary to complete the Work as planned within the required time and to charge the cost of all such Work against the Contractor and his, or its Surety shall be held responsible therefore. The Contractor fully understands and agrees that the County shall not pay for any G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. LEARNING CTR - 3 obligation incurred or expenditure made by the Contractor prior to the effective _ date of the notice to proceed described above, unless the County authorizes payment in writing. such As the Contractor's only remedy for delay, the County may grant an extension of the contract time, when a controlling item of Work is delayed by any factors contemplated or not contemplated at the time of the bid. Such extension of time may be allowed for delays occurring during the contract time period or authorized extension of the contract time. All claims for extension of time shall be made in writing to the County. Claims for delay due to inclement weather shall be made by the 10th day of the month following the month of the delay. All other claims shall be made no more than twenty (20) days after the commencement of the delay. Claims made beyond these time limits shall be null and void. Requests for extension of time shall be fully documented and shall include copies of daily logs, letters, shipping orders, delivery tickets, and other supporting information. In case of a continuing cause of delay only one (1) claim is necessary. Normal working weeks are based on a five (5) day week. All authorized extensions of time shall be done by Change Order. 7• DELAY DAMAGES It is mutually agreed between the parties hereto that time is of the essence in the performance of this Contract. In the event the construction of the Work is not completed within the time herein specified the County will suffer damages, the amount of which is difficult if not impossible to ascertain. It is agreed, therefore, that from the compensation otherwise to be paid to the Contractor, the County may retain the sum of one hundred and 0/ 100 ($100.00)dollars per calendar day for each day thereafter, Sundays and holidays included, that the Work remains uncompleted. This sum shall represent the damages which the County will have sustained per calendar day from the inconvenience and expense caused to the County by the delay in the completion of the Work. This sum is not a penalty, being the liquidated damages the County will have sustained in event of such default by the Contractor. The County also reserves the right to recover actual __ damages for other harm which results from the delay. The Contractor shall be liable for liquidated damages even if the Contract is terminated by the County for cause or if the Contractor abandons the Work. The liability of the Contractor and its surety or sureties for liquidated or actual damages is joint and several. 8 • CONTRACT PAYMENT The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Contract and completion of the project in accordance with the Contract Documents, subject G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. LEARNING CTR - 4 - ~rI' `r./ to adjustment by change order, the total estimated amount in current funds being: An amount not to exceed sis hundred forty-four thousand five hundred ninety-eight and 0/ 100 ($644,598.00) dollars * The Contractor agrees to credit the County for any appropriate deducts that may be obtained through the donation of materials. In the event of conflict over the amount of the deduct, the parties agree that the architect shall be the final arbiter of the deduct amount. 9. PAYMENT SCHEDULE The County shall make payments on account of the Contract as follows: Once each month progress payments shall be made during the process of construction in amounts not to exceed ninety percent (90%) of the amount due on the Contract on the basis of Work completed as certified by the Contractor and approved by the County's Project Manager. Contractor shall submit a payment application to the County's Project Manager by the 25th day of each month. The application shall be for the dollar amount of the Work complete on the last day preceding the submission of the application. Payment to the Contractor shall be ,made within~~ business days of the County's receipt of the application erg Ee~rty. The County may reject the application in writing which shall specify the deficiency and the action necessary to correct the deficiency. Payment shall be due 10 days after the County's receipt of a corrected application. All applications for payment submitted by the Contractor shall reference the County's Contract number. - Upon completion of the Contract the Contractor shall submit evidence satisfactory to the County that all payroll material, bills, and other indebtedness -" incurred by the Contractor in connection with the construction of the project have been paid in full. After the Work has been inspected and approved and after the Contractor has submitted satisfactory evidence of payment, the County's Project Manager shall promptly issue a final certificate. Final payment shall be due ~ within~~0 business days after the County's Project Manager issues the final certificate. The County shall pay the Contractor through payments issued by the County Finance Department in accordance with the Florida Prompt Payment Act G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. LEARNING CTR - 5 ~/ ``rA~ of the Florida Statutes, Chapter 218.70, upon receipt of the certified invoice from the County Project Manager. The parties agree, however, that any payments withheld as liquidated damages or for any other reason allowed by this Contract, shall not be governed by the Florida Prompt Payment Act. 10. SUBCONTRACTORS In the event Contractor requires the services of any subcontractor or professional associate in connection with the Work to be performed under this Contract, the Contractor shall secure the written approval of the County Project Manager before engaging such subcontractor or professional associate. 11. A DIT The Contractor agrees that the County or any of its duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of three years after expenditure of funds under this Contract, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the Contractor involving transactions related to this Contract. The Contractor agrees that payment(s) made under this Contract shall be subject to reduction for amounts charged thereto which are found on the basis of audit examination not to constitute allowable costs under this Contract. The Contractor shall refund by check payable to the County the amount of such reduction of payments. All required records shall be maintained until an audit is completed and all questions arising therefrom are resolved, or three years after completion of the project and issuance of the final certificate, whichever is sooner. 12. PUBLIC RECORDS - The Contractor shall allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other material subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and -" made or received by the Contractor in conjunction with this Contract. 13. GUARANTEE The Contractor guarantees the Work to be free from construction defects for a period of one (1) year from final payment by the County, in accordance with the guarantee requirements of the General Conditions. 14. CONTRACTOR RESPONSIBILITY G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. LEARNING CTR - 6 °~„~' The Contractor is an independent contractor and is not an employee or agent of the County. Nothing in this Contract shall be interpreted to establish any relationship other than that of an independent contractor, between the County and the Contractor, its employees, agents, subcontractors, or assigns, during or after the performance of this Contract. The Contractor shall take the whole responsibility for the means, methods, techniques, sequences, and production of the Work. The Contractor shall bear all losses resulting to him, or its, on account of the amount or character of the Work, or because of the nature of the ground in or on which the Work is done is different from what was assumed or expected, or because of bad weather, or because of errors or omissions in his or its bid on the Contract price, or except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents because of any other causes whatsoever. Execution of this Contract by the Contractor is a representation that the Contractor has visited the site, become familiar with the local conditions under which the Work is to be performed, and correlated personal observations with the requirements of the Contract Documents. The Contractor shall protect the entire Work, all materials under the Contract and the County's property (including machinery and equipment) in, or on, or adjacent to the site of the Work until final completion and Work, from the action of the elements, acts of other contractors, or except as otherwise provided in the Contract Documents, and from any other causes whatsoever; should any damage occur by reason of any of the foregoing, the Contractor shall repair at his, or its, own expenses to the satisfaction of the County or its Project Manager. Neither the County nor its officers, employees or agents assume any responsibility for collection of indemnities or damages from any person or persons causing injury to the Work of the Contractor. At his, or its expense, the Contractor shall take all necessary precautions (including without limitation) the furnishing of guards, fences, warnings signs, walks, flags, cables and lights for the safety of and the prevention of injury, loss and damage to persons and property (including without limitation) in the term persons, members of the public, the County and its employees and agents, the Project Manager and his employees, Contractor's employees, his or its subcontractors and their respective employees, other contractors, their subcontractors and respective employees, on, about or adjacent to the premises where said Work is being performed, and shall comply with all applicable provisions of safety laws, rules, ordinances, regulations and orders of duly constituted public authorities and building codes. G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUZN-ENV. LEARNING CTR - 7 The Contractor assumes all risk of loss, damage and destruction to all of his or its materials, tools appliances and property of every description and that of his or its subcontractors and of their respective employees or agents, and injury to or death of the Contractor, his or its employees, subcontractors or their respective employees or agents, including legal fees, court costs or other legal expenses, arising out of or in connection with the performance of this Contract. 15. Contractor agrees to pay on behalf of, protect, defend, reimburse, indemnify and hold the County, its agents, employees, elected officers and representatives and each of them, (hereinafter collectively and for the purposes of this paragraph, referred to as "County''), free and harmless at all times from and against any and all claims, liability, expenses, losses, costs, fines and damages, including attorney's fees, and causes of action of every kind and character against County by reason of any damage to property or the environment, or bodily injury (including death) incurred or sustained by any parry hereto, or of any party acquiring any interest hereunder, any agent or employee of any party hereto or of any party acquiring an interest hereunder, and any third or other party whomsoever, or any governmental agency, arising out of or in incident to or in connection with Contractor's performance under this Contract, the condition of the premises, Contractor's acts, or omissions or operations hereunder, or the performance, non-performance or purported performance of the Contractor of any breach of the terms of this Contract; provided however that Contractor shall not be responsible to County for damages resulting out of bodily injury or damages to property which Contractor can establish as being attributable to the sole negligence of County, its respective agents, servants, employees or officers. Contractor further agrees to pay on behalf of and hold harmless and - indemnify County for any fines, citations, court judgments, insurance claims, __ restoration costs or other liability resulting from its activities on the project, whether or not Contractor was negligent or even knowledgeable of any events precipitating a claim or arising as a result of any situation involving Contractor's activities. Said indemnification by Contractor shall be extended to include all deliverers, suppliers, furnishers of material or anyone acting for, on behalf of, or at the request of Contractor. Contractor recognizes the broad nature of this indemnification and hold harmless clause and voluntarily makes this covenant. In conformance with Section 725.06 Florida Statutes, the specific consideration G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. LEARNING CTR - 8 V..ri" given for the promises of the Contractor set forth with regard to this indemnification and hold harmless clause is $10.00 in hand paid by the County to the Contractor as a portion of the contract price, receipt thereof is hereby acknowledged and the adequacy of which the Contractor accepts as completely fulfilling the obligations of the County under the requirement of Section 725.06 Florida Statutes. This indemnification and hold harmless survives acceptance of the Work. This clause of the Contract will extend beyond the term of the Agreement for a period of ten (10) years after the date of the acceptance of the Work by the COUNTY. 16. INSPECTION The project will be inspected by the Project Manager and will be rejected if it is not in conformity with the Contract provisions. Rejected Work will be immediately corrected by the Contractor. When the Work is substantially completed, the Contractor shall notify the County in writing that the Work shall be ready for final inspection on a definite date, at least three (3) calendar days thereafter, which shall be stated in such notice. 17. PUBLIC CONSTRUCTION BOND The Contractor shall, upon execution and return of this Contract to the County, furnish to the County a public construction bond using the attached form or incorporating all of the terms and conditions set forth therein and covering the faithful performance of this Contract and the payment of all obligations arising hereunder in the amount of one hundred percent (100%) of the Contract amount. The liability of the Contractor and its surety or sureties for the faithful performance of this Contract and the payment of all obligations arising hereunder is joint and several. The Contractor shall record the public construction bond in the Official Records for St. Lucie County and provide the County with a copy of the recorded bond. The public construction bond required hereunder shall meet the following minimum standards: A. The surety issuing the bond must be licensed to do business in the State of Florida, hold a certificate of authorization to write surety bonds in the State, hold a currently valid certificate of authority issued by the United States Department of the Treasury, and otherwise be in compliance with the provisions of the Florida Insurance Code. G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. LEARNING CTR - 9 B. The attorney-in-fact must provide a certified copy of his or her power of attorney to sign the bond. C. The name, address and telephone number of the surety and its agent must be listed on the bond. D. For contracts up to $499,999.99 the surety shall have twice the minimum surplus and capital required by the Florida Insurance Code at the time the bid is issued for the Work, otherwise the surety shall have the following minimum ratings Contract Amount Best Key Rating $500,000 to $2,499,999.99 Class XII A or better Over $2,500,000 Class XIV or better 18. INSURANCE The Contractor shall procure and maintain during the life of this Contract insurance of the types and subject to the limits set forth below. The Contractor shall also provide the County with evidence of this insurance in the form of Certificates of Insurance which shall be subject to the County's approval for adequacy. The County shall be given thirty (30) days prior written notice of any material changes or cancellations of the policies. If sub-contractors are used by the contractor, it shall be the responsibility of the contractor to ensure that all its sub-contractors comply with all the insurance requirements contained herein relating to such sub-contractors. All insurance companies providing insurance under this Contract shall be licensed and authorized to do business in the State of Florida. These companies - shall have a general policy holders rating of A or better and a financial rating of X or better according to the latest edition of Best's Key Rating Guide, published by A.M. Best Company. Any deductibles or self insured retention must be declared to and approved by the County. At the option of the County, either the insurer shall reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self insured retention with respect to the County, its elected and appointed officials, employees, volunteers and agents, or the contractor shall procure a bond guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration and defense expenses. G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. LEARNING CTR - 1 ~ - ~' Except as otherwise stated, the amounts and types of insurance shall conform to the following minimum requirements: A. WORKERS' COMPENSATION The Contractor shall provide and maintain during the life of this Contract, at his, its or their own expense, Workers' Compensation insurance coverage to apply for all employees for Florida statutory limits. Coverage B, Employers Liability, shall be written for a minimum liability at X100,000.00 per occurrence. B. COMMERCIAL GENERAL LIABILITY The Contractor shall provide and maintain during the life of this Contract, at his, its or their own expense, Commercial General Liability insurance on an occurrence basis for a minimum combined single limit of $500,000.00 per occurrence, for claims of bodily injury including death, property damage and personal injury. The coverages of Owners and Contractors Protective, Contractual Liability and the coverage of XCU shall be included. The Contractual Liability coverage shall be specifically endorsed to include indemnity and hold harmless requirements set forth herein. C. COMMERCIAL AUTO LIABILITY The Contractor shall provide and maintain during the life of the contract, at his, its or their own expense, Business Commercial Auto Liability for claims of bodily injury and property damage for minimum limits of $200,000.00 combined single limit. - D. BUILDERS' RISK -- The Contractor shall provide and maintain during the life of this Contract, at his, its or their own expense, Builders' Risk completed value form written on an "All Risk" basis for the equivalent value of the completed Work. The policy shall be written in the name of both the Contractor and the County. This insurance shall be kept in force until the Contractor has received final acceptance from the County. The policy shall also include a provision that the premises may be occupied and used by the County. E. ADDITIONAL NAMED INSURED G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. LE4RNING CTR - Z Z - ~~ If the Contract payment amount exceeds X50,000.00 as set forth in paragraph 8. of this Contract, the General Liability, Auto Liability and Builders risk policies shall contain or be endorsed to state that the County, its Officers, Officials, Employees, Agents, and Volunteers are to be covered as additional named insureds for any and all liability arising out of the Contractor's performance of this Contract, or veraoe steal montain no special l mitations~ on borrowed by the Contractor. The co g scope of protection offered to the County, its Officers, Officials, Employee, Agents and Volunteers. F. OTHER INSURANCE PROVISIONS 1. The Contractor's insurance coverage shall be primary insurance as respects the County, its Officers, Officials, Employees, Agents and Volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the County, its Officers, Officials, Employees, Agents, or Volunteers shall be in excess of the Contractor's insurance and shall not contribute with it. 2. Any failure to comply with the reporting provisions of the policy shall not effect coverage provided to the County, its Officers, Officials, Employees, Agents, or Volunteers. 3. The Contractors insurance shall apply separately to each insured against whom a claim is made or suit is brought, except with respect to the limits of insurer's liability . 19. DEFAULT• TERMINATION A. FOR CAUSE If either party fails to fulfill its obligations under this Contract in a timely and proper manner, the other party shall have the right to terminate this Contract by giving written notice of any deficiency and by allowing the party in default seven (7) calendar days to correct the deficiency. If the defaulting party fails to correct the deficiency within the seven calendar day period, this Contract shall terminate at the expiration of that time period. G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. LEARNING CTR - Z 2 ~ ~ With regard to the Contractor, the following items shall be considered a default under this Contract: (1) If the Contractor should be adjudged bankrupt, or if he, or it, should make a general assignment for the benefit of his, or its, creditors, or if a receiver should be appointed on account of his, or its, insolvency. (2) If the Contractor should refuse or fail, except in cases for which an extension of time is provided, to supply enough properly skilled workmen or proper material to meet the project schedule or if the Contractor should fail to make prompt payment for materials, or labor or other services entering into the Work. (3) If the Contractor disregards laws, ordinances, or the instructions of the Project Manager or otherwise be guilty of a substantial violation of the provisions of the Contract. (4) Fails to perform any of the terms of this Contract or performs work which fails to conform to the requirements of this Contract. In the event of termination, the County may take possession of the premises and all materials, tools, and appliances, thereon and finish the Work by whatever method it may deem expedient. In such cases, the Contractor shall only be entitled to receive payment for Work satisfactorily completed prior to the termination date. The County may take possession of and use any materials, plant, tools, equipment, and property of any kind furnished by Contractor to complete the Work. If the expense incurred by the County to finish the Work exceeds the unpaid balance on this Contract, the Contractor shall pay the difference to the County. The expense incurred by the County as herein provided, and the damage incurred through the Contractor's default, shall be certified by the Project Manager. The Contractor shall be responsible for both liquidated - damages attributable to delay and for excess completion costs. The liability of the Contractor and its surety or sureties for such damages and costs is joint and several. The obligations of the Contractor and his surety with respect to the warranty and maintenance bond shall remain in full force and effect for the portion of the Work completed by the Contractor and shall not expire until the expiration of the prescribed time period measured from the final acceptance of the project in its entirety. These clauses shall survive the termination of this Contract. If the County makes a determination pursuant to this Contract to hold the Contractor in default and terminate the Contract for cause and it is subsequently determined that any such determination was improper, unwarranted, or wrongful, then any such termination shall be deemed for all purposes as a termination without cause as G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. LEARNING CTR - 1 3 - described below. - g. WITHOUT CAUSE Either party may terminate the Contract without cause at any time u on thirty (30) calendar days prior written notice to the other party. Upon such P termination, the Contractor waives any claims for damages from the termination without cause, including loss of anticip~ tamed omfi ensate thetContract g fo all remedy of the Contractor, the County s P authorized Work satisfactorily and responsibly completed through the termination date. In the event of termination by the Contractor without cause, the following shall apply: (1) all bonds shall remain fully in force to insure the County's ability to construct the project for the Contract amount; (2) the County shall have the right to, at its option, solicit bids for the completion of the unfinished portion of the Work, or to negotiate with the number two bidder under the original bid; and (3) the Contractor and his surety shall be jointly and severally responsible for all costs over the original Contract amount incurred by the County in completion of the project, in addition to construction costs, such costs may include engineering, advertising, and administrative expenses incurred with the solicitations of bids for the completion of the unfinished portion of the Work. In the event of termination without cause by either party, the obligations of the Contractor and his surety with respect to the warranty and maintenance bond shall remain in full force and effect for the portion of the Work completed by the Contractor and shall not expire until the expiration of the prescribed time period measured from the final acceptance of the project in its entirety. These clauses shall survive the termination of this Contract. 20. NON DISCRIMINATION - Contractor covenants and agrees that Contractor shall not discriminate against any employee or applicant for employment to be employed in the performance of the Contract with respect to hiring, tenure, terms, conditions or privileges of employment, or any matter directly or indirectly related to employment because of age, sex or physical handicaps (except where based on a bonafide occupational qualification); or because of marital status, race, color, religion, national origin or ancestry. 21. VERIFICATION OF EMPLOYMENT STATUS G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. LEARNING CTR - 1 4 - '~1w/ '~ The County will not intentionally award contracts to any contractor who knowingly employs unauthorized alien workers, constituting a violation of the employment provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act ("INA"). The County shall consider the employment by the Contractor of unauthorized aliens a violation of 8 U.S.C. Section 1324a(e) [Section 274A(e) of the INA]. The Contractor agrees that such violation by the Contractor shall be grounds for the unilateral cancellation of this Contract by the County. 22. PRODUCTS R MATERIALS WITH RECYCLED CONTENT Contractor is required to procure products or materials with recycled content with respect to Work performed or products supplied under the contract when those products or materials are available at reasonable prices. A decision to not procure such items must be based on a determination that such procurement: a) Is not available within a reasonable period of time; or b) Fails to meet the performance standards set forth in the applicable specifications or fails to meet the reasonable performance standards of the agency. Contractor shall provide the County with a written statement indicating what recycled products were used or supplied. If a decision was made not to use recycled products, Contractor shall provide County with a written statement indicating the basis for the decision using the above criteria. 23. FLORIDA PRODUCED LUMBER Where applicable Contractor agrees to comply with the provisions of Section 255.20, Florida Statutes, (1997) and as may be amended from time to time. 24. ASBESTOS-FREE MATERIALS Contractor shall not use any asbestos or asbestos-based fiber materials in the Work performed under this Contract. 25. ASSIGNMENT The County reserves the right to freely assign this Contract. The Contractor, however, shall not assign this Contract to any other persons or firm without first obtaining County's written approval. G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. LEARNING CTR - Z S - ~ ~'"~ 26. ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS In the event of any dispute concerning the terms and conditions of this Contract or in the event of any action by any party to this Contract to judicially interpret or enforce this Contract or any provision hereof, or in any dispute arising in any manner from this Contract, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable costs, fees and expenses, incy ding blue not lanate dgo~, witness fees, expert fees, consultant fees, attorne p g assistant fees, costs and expenses and and whether any settlement shal be expenses, whether suit be brought or no , entered in any declaratory action, at trial or on appeal. The liability of the Contractor and its surety or sureties for such fees and costs is joint and several. 27. NOTICES All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or permitted under this Contract shall be in writing and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or courier service, telecommunicated, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid) return receipt requested, addressed to: As To County: With A Copy To: St. Lucie County Administrator St. Lucie County Attorney Administration Annex Administration Annex 2300 Virginia Avenue 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 As To Contractor: Paul Jacquin &, Sons, Inc. 7348 Commercial Circle Fort Pierce, Florida 34948-4343 or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this Section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered (a) on the date delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. 28. NON-WAIVER G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. LEARNING CTR - Z G - The rights of the parties under this Contract shall be cumulative and the failure of either party to exercise properly any rights given hereunder shall not operate to forfeit any of the said rights. 29. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The Contractor represents that it presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the performance of services required hereunder, as provided for in Section 112.311, Florida Statutes (1997) and as may be erson havino any inte~est shall be Contractor further represents that no p g employed for said performance. The Contractor shall promptly notify the County in writing by certified mail of all potential conflicts of interest prohibited by existing state law for any prospective business association, interest or other circumstance which may influence or appear to influence the Contractor's judgment or quality of services being provided hereunder. Such written notification shall identify the prospective business association, interest or circumstance, the nature of Work that the Contractor may undertake and request an opinion of the County as to whether the association, interest or circumstance would, in the opinion of the County, constitute a conflict of interest if entered into by the Contractor. The County agrees to notify the Contractor of its opinion by certified mail within thirty (30) days of receipt of notification by the Contractor. If, in the opinion of the County, the prospective business association, interest or circumstance would not constitute a conflict of interest by the Contractor, the County shall so state in the notification and the Contractor shall, at his /her option, enter into said association, interest or circumstance and it shall be deemed not in conflict of interest with respect to services provided to the County by the Contractor under the terms of this Contract. 30. MEDIATION -" In the event of a dispute between the parties in connection with this Contract, the parties agree to submit the disputed issue or issues to a mediator for non-binding mediation prior to filing a lawsuit. The parties shall agree on a mediator chosen from a list of certified mediators available from the Clerk of Court for St. Lucie County. The fee of the mediator shall be shared equally by the parties. To the extent allowed by law, the mediation process shall be confidential and the results of the mediation or any testimony or argument introduced at the mediation shall not be admissible as evidence in any subsequent proceeding concerning the disputed issue. -17- G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. LEARNING CTR 31. DISPUTE RESOLUTION Any disputes relating to a question of fact arising under this Contract shall be resolved through good faith efforts upon the part of the Contractor and the County or its representative. At all times, the Contractor shall carry on the work and maintain its progress schedule in accordance with the requirements of the Contract and the determination of the County or its representatives, pending resolution of the dispute. Any dispute which is not resolved by mutual agreement shall be decided by the County or its representatives who shall reduce the decision to writing. 32. INTERPRETATION• VENUE This Contract constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreements between the parties with respect thereto. This Contract may only be amended by written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by both parties hereto. This Contract shall be interpreted as a whole unit and section headings are for convenience only. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Contract, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit for St. Lucie County, Florida, for claims under state law and the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Contractor has affixed his, its, or their names, or name, and seal the date aforesaid. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA CLERK BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY BY: G:\ATTY\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. LEARNING CTR - ~' 8 ATTESIT: ~/ SECRETARY G:\ATTT\CONTRACT\JACQUIN-ENV. i,~~RNING CTR PAUL J BY: ~r.e+'` & SONS, INC. (SEAL) ~~- Print Name 9 i'7 ~l ` c,>/1"Gt~~~l ~ -19- ~ DA RE T ITEM NO. ~ ~ ~~ AGEN DATE: May 25,- 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] TO: Board of County Commissioners PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT):County Attorney Heather Young Assistant County Attorney ~T1 J,~ ECT: Blind Creek (Indian River Lagoon Tracts 100-001- 100-011) -Lease Agreement for Land Management Services with South Florida Water Management District BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum CA 99-688. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the propose lease agreement with the South Florida Water Management District for Blind Creek (Indian River Lagoon Tracts 100- 00 through 100-011) . COMMISSION ACTION: [' APPROVED [ ]DENIED [ ]OTHER: `V'~: County Attorney: Review and Approvals Management & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for py only, if applicable): _ (;ounty Actm>mstrator rte, `.~' INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 99-688 DATE: May 19, 1999 ~.~~~~ SUBTECT: Blind Creek (Indian River Lagoon Tracts 100-001- 100-011) -Lease Agreement for Land Management Services with South Florida Water Management District BACKGROUND: Attached to this memorandum is a copy of a proposed lease agreement for land management services with the South Florida Water Management District for Blind Creek (Indian River Lagoon Tracts 100-00 through 100-011). A map showing the location of the subject parcels is attached to the lease. The term of the lease is fifty (50) years. The lease requires the County, as lessee, to submit a management plan for the property within one (1) year of the commencement date. Upon approval by the District's governing board, use of the property will be subject to the provisions of the management plan. CONCLUSION/RECOIVIlVIENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the propose lease agreement with the South Florida Water Management District for Blind Creek (Indian River Lagoon Tracts 100-00 through 100-011). Respectfully submitted, Heather Young Assistant County Attorney HY/ Copies to: County Administrator Mosquito Control Director Finance Director Management and Budget Manager Contracts Coordinator C-10485 LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE oRiciNa~ SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT AND ST. LUCIE COUNTY FOR LAND MANAGEMENT SEVICES AT INDIAN RIVER LAGOON, TRACTS 100-001 THRU 100-011 This LEASE AGREEMENT ("LEASE") is entered into on 1999, between "the parties," the South Florida Water Management District, a public corporation of the State of Florida ("the LESSOR"), and St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners, ("the LESSEE") for the use and benefit of St. Lucie County. WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the LESSOR is a public corporation of the State of Florida, created by the Florida Legislature and given those powers and responsibilities enumerated in Chapter 373, Florida Statutes to include entering into contracts with public agencies, private corporations or other persons; and WHEREAS, the LESSOR holds title to certain lands and property being utilized by the State of Florida for public purposes; and WHEREAS, the LESSOR desires that public lands within the Indian River Lagoon Save Our Rivers project area be leased for use and possession by the LESSEE; and NOW THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the mutual covenants and agreements hereinafter contained, the LESSOR leases the below described premises to the LESSEE subject to the following terms and conditions: Lease Agreement No. C-10485 -Page 1 of 13 ``rr/ ~ ARTICLE 1-PREMISES TO BE LEASED 1.1 DESCRIPTION OF PREMISES: The property subject to this LEASE is situated in the County of St. Lucie, State of Florida and is more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and hereinafter referred to as the "leased premises." 1.2 PURPOSE: The LESSEE shall manage the leased premises as part of the Indian River Lagoon for purposes authorized in Section 373.59, Florida Statutes, along with other related uses necessary for the accomplishment of these purposes, and as designated in the Management Plan required by paragraph 1.5 of this LEASE. 1.3 QUIET ENJOYMENT AND RIGHT OF USE: The LESSEE shall have the right of ingress and egress to, from, and upon the leased premises for all purposes necessary to the full quiet enjoyment by said LESSEE of the rights conveyed herein. 1.4 AUTHORIZED USES: Authorized uses for the purposes of the Lease shall be defined as those management activities that the LESSEE is authorized to perform under the terms and conditions of this lease and the approved Management Plan pursuant to paragraph 1.5. The authorized uses shall be consistent with statutory requirements that require the leased premises to be managed and maintained in an environmentally acceptable manner to restore and protect its natural state and condition, including permitting of compatible recreational use. The authorized uses shall at a minimum always include essential site management measures including but not limited to, security, resource protection, public access, and recreational use, habitat management and enhancement of land use control. The LESSEE shall, through its agents and employees, prevent the unauthorized use of the leased premises or any use thereof not in conformance with this LEASE. 1.5 MANAGEMENT PLAN: The LESSEE shall manage the leased premises in accordance with the purposes identified in Paragraph 1.2 above. Within one (1) year a Management Plan (pursuant to Section 253.034, of the Florida Statutes) shall be submitted to the LESSOR for approval by the LESSOR'S Governing Board. The parcels shall not be developed or physically altered in any way other than what is necessary for security and maintenance of the leased premises without the prior written approval of the LESSOR until the Management Plan is approved. For the purposes of preparing the management plan, the LESSOR will include the LESSEE in the review. The approved Management Plan shall provide the basic guidance for all management activities on parcels and shall be reviewed jointly by the LESSEE and the LESSOR at least every five (5) years. The LESSEE shall not use or alter the parcels except as provided for in the approved Management Plan without the prior written approval of the LESSOR. The Lease Agreement No. C-10485 -Page 2 of 13 `~r/'' Management Plan prepared under this LEASE shall identify management strategies for exotic species (see Exhibit "B"), if present. The introduction of exotic species is prohibited, except when specifically authorized by the approved Management Plan. 1.6 RIGHT OF INSPECTION: The LESSOR or its duly authorized agents, upon reasonable notice, shall have the right at any and all times to inspect the leased premises and the works and operations thereon of the LESSEE, in any matter pertinent to this LEASE. 1.7 ARCHAEOLOGICAL AND HISTORIC SITES: Execution of this LEASE in no way affects any of the parties' obligations pursuant to Chapter 267, Florida Statutes. The collection of artifacts or the disturbance of archaeological and historic sites on state owned lands is prohibited unless prior authorization has been obtained from the Division of Historical Resources of the Florida Department of State. The Management Plan prepared pursuant to Section 253.034, Florida Statutes, shall be reviewed by the Division of Historical Resources of the Florida Department of State to ensure that adequate measures have .been planned to locate, identify, protect and preserve the archaeological and historic sites and properties on the leased premises. 1.8 EASEMENTS: LESSEE is expressly prohibited from granting any easements including, but not limited to, utility easements without the prior written approval of the LESSOR. Any easements or other conveyances not approved in writing by the LESSOR shall be void and without legal effect. 1.9 SUBLEASES: Subleases of any nature are prohibited without the prior written approval of LESSOR. Any sublease not approved in writing by LESSOR shall be void and without legal effect. However, LESSEE may utilize its own contractors to perform work consistent with the Management Plan approved by the LESSOR. 1.10 BEST MANAGEMENT PRACTICES: The LESSEE shall implement applicable Best Management Practices for all activities conducted under this LEASE, which have been selected, developed, or approved by the LESSOR or other land management agencies for the protection and enhancement of the leased premises. 1.11 MINERAL RIGHTS: The LESSOR agrees not to exercise or permit the exercise of aright of entry over, upon, or across the leased premises or use or permit the use of the surface estate or interest in the leased premises for testing, exploration or development of any natural resources including oil, gas, or minerals, during the term of this LEASE. 1.12 UTILITY FEES: The LESSEE shall be responsible for the payment of all charges Lease Agreement No. C-10485 -Page 3 of 13 i. for the furnishing of gas, electricity, water, and other public utilities in connection with the LESSEE'S use of the leased premises and for having all utilities turned off when the leased premises are surrendered. 1.13 PLACEMENT AND REMOVAL OF IMPROVEMENTS: All buildings, structures, improvements, and signs erected in connection with LESSEE'S use of the leased premises, shall be constructed at the expense of the LESSEE in accordance with plans prepared by professional designers and, except for those structures and improvements which are identified in the Management Plan, shall require the prior written approval of the LESSOR as to purpose, location, and design. Further, with the exception of those activities identified in the Management Plan, no trees, other than non-native species, shall be removed or major land alterations done without the prior written approval of the LESSOR. All buildings, structures, improvements, and signs placed on the leased premises by the LESSEE will remain the property of the LESSEE and may be removed by the LESSEE upon termination of this LEASE, subject to Paragraph 6.2 below. 1.14 MAINTENANCE OF IMPROVEMENTS: The LESSEE shall maintain the real property contained within the leased premises and any improvements located thereon, in a state of good condition, working order and repair including, but not limited to, maintaining the planned improvements as set forth in the approved Management Plan, meeting applicable building and safety codes in the location situated, keeping the leased premises free of trash or litter and maintaining any and all existing roads, canals, ditches, culverts, risers and the like in as good condition as the same may be on the effective date of this LEASE. 1.15 PROHIBITIONS AGAINST LIENS OR OTHER ENCUMBRANCES: Fee title to the leased premises is held by the LESSOR. The LESSEE shall not do or permit anything to be done which purports to create a lien or encumbrance of any nature against the real property contained in the leased premises including, but not limited to, mortgages or construction liens against the leased premises or against any interest of the LESSOR therein. 1.16 DAMAGE TO THE PREMISES: The LESSEE shall not do, or suffer to be done, in, on or upon the leased premises or as affecting said leased premises or adjacent properties, any act which may result in damage or depreciation of value to the leased premises or adjacent properties, or any part thereof. The LESSEE shall not generate, store, produce, place, treat, release or discharge any contaminants, pollutants or pollution, including, but not limited to, hazardous or toxic substances, chemicals or other agents on, into, or from the leased premises or any adjacent lands or waters in any manner not permitted by law. For the purposes of this LEASE, "hazardous substances" shall mean and include those elements or compounds defined in 42 USC Section 9601 or which are contained in the list of hazardous substances adopted by the United States Environmental Lease Agreement No. C-10485 -Page 4 of 13 ~.~+" `~" Protection Agency (EPA) and the list of toxic pollutants designated by the United States Congress or the EPA or defined by any other federal, state, or local statute, law, ordinance, code, rule, regulation, order or decree regulating, relating to, or imposing liability or standards of conduct concerning any hazardous, toxic or dangerous waste, substance, material, pollutant or contaminant. "Pollutants" and "pollution" shall mean those products or substances defined in Chapters 376 and 403, Florida Statutes, and the rules promulgated thereunder, all as amended or updated from time to time. In the event of the LESSEE'S failure to comply with this paragraph, the LESSEE shall, at its sole cost and expense, promptly commence and diligently pursue any legal required closure, investigation, assessment, cleanup, decontamination, remediation, restoration and monitoring of (1) the leased premises, and (2) all off-site ground and surface waters and lands affected by the LESSEE'S failure to comply, as may be necessary to bring the leased premises and affected off-site waters and lands into full compliance with all applicable federal, state or local statutes, laws, ordinances, codes, rules, regulations, orders and decrees, and to restore the damaged property to the condition existing immediately prior to the occurrence which caused the damage. The LESSEE'S obligations set forth in this paragraph shall survive the termination or expiration of this LEASE. Nothing herein shall relieve the LESSEE of any responsibility or liability prescribed by law for fines, penalties and damages levied by governmental agencies, and the cost of cleaning up any contamination caused directly or indirectly by the LESSEE'S activities or facilities. Upon discovery of a release of a hazardous substance or pollutant, or any other violation of local, state or federal law, ordinance, code, rule, regulation, order or decree relating to the generation, storage, production, placement, treatment, release or discharge of any contaminant, the LESSEE shall report such violation to all applicable governmental agencies having jurisdiction, and to the LESSOR, all within the applicable reporting periods of the applicable agencies which LESSEE is legally permitted to pay. 1.17 PAYMENT OF TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS: The LESSEE shall assume full responsibility for and shall pay all liabilities that accrue to the leased premises or to the improvements thereon as a result of LESSEE'S use of the leased premises pursuant to this lease, including any and all drainage and special assessments or taxes of every kind and all mechanic's or materialman's liens which may be hereafter lawfully assessed and levied against the leased premises. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the LESSOR agrees not to levy any special assessments or taxes on the LESSEE during the LESSEE'S use of the leased premises pursuant to this LEASE. ARTICLE 2 -TERM 2.1 The term of this LEASE shall commence on the date of execution and shall continue for a period of fifty (50) years, unless sooner terminated pursuant to the provisions of this LEASE. Lease Agreement No. C-10485 -Page 5 of 13 ~ru+" ~ 2.2 The parties agree that time is of the essence in the performance of each and every obligation under this LEASE. ARTICLE 3 -CONSIDERATION 3.1 The parties agree that their respective obligations will be carried out at no cost to the other party. 3.2 Nothing contained in this LEASE shall be construed as obligating the LESSEE to either expend funds or involving any party in a contract or other obligation for the future payment of money in excess of the authorized funding. The LESSEE shall use its best efforts to obtain adequate funding in subsequent fiscal years. ARTICLE 4 -PROJECT MANAGEMENT/NOTICE 4.1 The Project Manager for the LESSOR is Director, Land Stewardship Division, at P.O. Box 24680, 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-4680; Phone (561) 687-6636. The Project Manager for the LESSEE is Director, St. Lucie County Mosquito Control, 3150 Will Fee Rd., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982, phone (561) 462-1692. The parties shall direct all matters arising in connection with the performance of this LEASE, other than notices, to the attention of the Project Managers for attempted resolution or action. The Project Managers shall be responsible for overall coordination and oversight relating to the performance of this LEASE. 4.2 All notices, demands, or other communications to the LESSEE under this LEASE shall be in writing and shall be deemed received if sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to: Director, St. Lucie County Mosquito Control, 3150 Will Fee Rd., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. All notices to the LESSOR under this LEASE shall be in writing and sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to: South Florida Water Management District Attn: Director, Land Stewardship Division 3301 Gun Club Road P.O. Box 24680 West Palm Beach, Florida 33416-4680 The LESSEE shall also provide a copy of all notices to the LESSOR'S Division of Procurement and Contract Administration. All notices required by this LEASE shall be considered delivered upon receipt. Should either party change its address, written notice of such new address shall promptly be sent to the other party. All Lease Agreement No. C-10485 -Page 6 of 13 `tis~'' correspondence to the LESSOR under this LEASE shall reference the LESSOR'S Contract Number C-10485. ARTICLE 5 -LIABILITY & INSURANCE 5.1 The LESSEE shall bear the sole responsibility for any and all claims for personal injuries or property damage arising from, or incident to, the LESSEE'S use, occupation, and possession of the Property and the facilities located thereon. Nothing in this LEASE is intended or is to be construed as a waiver of sovereign immunity as provided to the parties signatory hereto under Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, or as otherwise provided by law. 5.2 The LESSEE assumes any and all risks of personal injury, bodily injury and property damage attributable to the negligent acts or omissions of the LESSEE and the officers, employees, servants, and agents thereof. The LESSEE, as a state agency, represents that it is self-funded for liability insurance, or has liability insurance, both public and property, with such protection being applicable to the LESSEE officers, employees, servants and agents while acting within the scope of their employment with the LESSEE. The LESSEE and the LESSOR further agree that nothing contained herein shall be construed or interpreted as (1) denying to either parry any remedy or defense available to such party under the laws of the State of Florida; (2) the consent of the State of Florida or its agents and agencies to be sued; (3) a waiver of sovereign immunity of the State of Florida beyond the waiver provided in Section 768.28, Florida Statutes, or (4) a waiver of limitation of liability protection as provided in Section 373.1395, Florida Statutes. 5.3 The LESSEE shall throughout the term of this LEASE, provide, maintain, and keep in force a program of insurance covering its liabilities as prescribed by Section 768.28 Florida Statutes and to include Worker's Compensation Coverage. In addition, nothing contained herein shall be construed as a waiver of limitations of liability which may be enjoyed by the LESSOR as a landowner providing land to the public for outdoor recreation purposes, as provided in Section 373.1395, Florida Statutes, or any other law providing limitations on claims against the landowner. ARTICLE 6 -TERMINATION/SURRENDER OF PREMISES/REMEDIES 6.1 If either party fails to fulfill its obligations under this Agreement in a timely and proper manner, the other parry may give written notice to the other party in default specifying the nature of the deficiency. The party in default shall then have one hundred twenty (120) calendar days from receipt of notice to correct the deficiency. If the defaulting party fails to correct this deficiency within this time, the party defaulted upon may have the option to terminate this Agreement at the expiration of the one hundred twenty (120) day time period. Not withstanding the foregoing, Lease Agreement No. C-10485 -Page 7 of 13 ~.r' '~r~ i either party may terminate this Agreement upon mutual agreement at any time for convenience upon one hundred twenty (120) days prior written notice to the other party. 6.2 Upon expiration or termination of this LEASE, all improvements, including both physical structures and modifications to the leased premises, shall become the property of the LESSOR, except for those improvements which the LESSEE removes at the LESSEE'S expense upon termination of this LEASE. Prior to surrender of all or any part of the leased premises, a representative of the LESSOR shall perform an on-site inspection and the keys to any buildings on the leased premises shall be turned over to the LESSOR. If the leased premises do not meet all conditions as set forth in Article 1 of this LEASE, the LESSEE shall, at its expense, pay all cost(s) necessary to meet the prescribed conditions. 6.3 In the event a dispute arises which the project managers cannot resolve between themselves, the parties shall have the option to submit to nonbinding mediation. The mediator or mediators shall be impartial, shall be selected by the parties, and the cost of the mediation shall be borne equally by the parties. The mediation process shall be confidential to the extent permitted by law. ARTICLE 7 -STANDARDS OF COMPLIANCE 7.1 The laws of the State of Florida shall govern all aspects of this LEASE. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this LEASE, venue shall be in the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit for claims under state law and in the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justifiable in federal court. 7.2 The LESSEE shall maintain records and the LESSOR shall have inspection and audit rights as follows: A. Maintenance of Records: The LESSEE shall maintain all financial and non- financial records and reports directly or indirectly related to the negotiation or performance of this LEASE including supporting documentation for any service rates, expenses, research or reports. Such records shall be maintained and made available for inspection for a period of five years from completing performance _- under this LEASE. B. Examination of Records: The LESSOR or its designated agent shall have the right to examine in accordance with generally accepted governmental auditing standards all records directly or indirectly related to this LEASE. Such examination may be made only within five years from the date of completing performance under this LEASE and upon reasonable notice, time and place. C. Extended Availability of Records for Legal Disputes: In the event that the Lease Agreement No. C-10485 -Page 8 of 13 '~rr+"' LESSOR should become involved in a legal dispute with a third party arising from performance under this LEASE, the LESSEE shall extend the period of maintenance for all records relating to the LEASE until the final disposition of the legal dispute, and all such records shall be made readily available to the LESSOR. 7.3 The LESSEE hereby assures that no person shall be discriminated against on the grounds of race, color, creed, national origin, handicap, age, or sex, in any activity under this LEASE. The LESSEE shall take all measures necessary to effectuate these assurances. 7.4 The LESSEE shall obtain, at its sole expense, all necessary licenses, authorizations and permits from the appropriate private parry or federal, state, municipal or local agency, and other governmental approvals, prior to commencing performance of this LEASE. 7.5 The LESSEE shall allow public access to all project documents and materials in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. Should the LESSEE assert any exemptions to the requirements of Chapter 119 and related Statutes, the burden of establishing such exemption, by way of injunctive or other relief as provided by law, shall be upon the LESSEE. ARTICLE 8 -RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE PARTIES 8.1 The LESSEE is an independent contractor and is not an employee or agent of the LESSOR. Nothing in this LEASE shall be interpreted to establish any relationship other than that of an independent contractor, between the LESSOR and the LESSEE, its employees, agents, subcontractors, or assigns, during or after the performance of this LEASE. 8.2 The LESSEE shall not assign, delegate, or otherwise transfer its rights and obligations as set forth in this LEASE without the prior written consent of the LESSOR. Any attempted assignment in violation of this provision shall be void. 8.3 The LESSEE shall not pledge the LESSOR'S credit or make the LESSOR a guarantor of payment or surety for any contract, debt, obligation, judgment, lien, or any form of indebtedness. ARTICLE 9 -GENERAL PROVISIONS 9.1 Notwithstanding any provisions of this LEASE to the contrary, the parties shall not be held liable for any failure or delay in the performance of this LEASE that arises from fires, floods, strikes, embargoes, acts of the public enemy, unusually severe weather, outbreak of war, restraint of Government, riots, civil commotion, force Lease Agreement No. C-10485 -Page 9 of 13 err' majeure, act of God, or for any other cause of the same character which is unavoidable through the exercise of due care and beyond the control of the parties. Failure to perform shall be excused during the continuance of such circumstances, but this LEASE shall otherwise remain in effect. This provision shall not apply if this LEASE specifies that performance by LESSEE is specifically required during the occurrence of any of the events herein mentioned. 92 In the event any provisions of this LEASE shall conflict, or appear to conflict, the LEASE, including all exhibits, attachments and all documents specifically incorporated by reference, shall be interpreted as a whole to resolve any inconsistency. 9.3 Failures or waivers to insist on strict performance of any covenant, condition, or provision of this LEASE by the parties, their successors and assigns shall not be deemed a waiver of any of its rights or remedies, nor shall it relieve the other party from performing any subsequent obligations strictly in accordance with the terms of this LEASE. No waiver shall be effective unless in writing and signed by the party against whom enforcement is sought. Such waiver shall be limited to provisions of this LEASE specifically referred to therein and shall not be deemed a waiver of any other provision. No waiver shall constitute a continuing waiver unless the writing states otherwise. 9.4 Should any term or provision of this LEASE be held, to any extent, invalid or unenforceable, as against any person, entity or circumstance during the term hereof, by force of any statute, law, or ruling of any forum of competent jurisdiction, such invalidity shall not affect any other term or provision of this LEASE, to the extent that the LEASE shall remain operable, enforceable and in full force and effect to the extent permitted by law. 9.5 Articles, subsections and other captions contained in this LEASE are for reference purposes only and are in no way intended to describe, interpret, define or limit the scope, extent or intent of this LEASE or any provisions thereof. 9.7 This LEASE is executed in duplicate originals, each of which shall be considered an original for all purposes. 9.8 All of the provisions of this LEASE shall be deemed covenants running with the land included in the leased premises, and construed to be "conditions" as well as "covenants" as though the words specifically expressing or imparting covenants and conditions were used in each separate provision. 9.9 This LEASE states the entire understanding and agreement between the parties and supersedes any and all written or oral representations, statements, negotiations, or agreements previously existing between the parties with respect to Lease Agreement No. C-10485 -Page 10 of 13 ~' `+~ the subject matter of this LEASE. The LESSEE recognizes that any representations, statements or negotiations made by LESSOR staff do not suffice to legally bind the LESSOR in a contractual relationship unless they have been reduced to writing and signed by an authorized LESSOR representative. This LEASE shall inure to the benefit of and shall be binding upon the parties, their respective assigns, and successors in interest. Lease Agreement No. C-10485 -Page 11 of 13 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this LEASE to be executed on the date first above written. LESSOR: (Seal) ATTEST: Print: STATE OF _ COUNTY OF SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT, BY ITS GOVERNING BOARD By: Chairman The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 19 by ,Chairman of the South Florida Water Management District, a public corporation of the State of Florida, on behalf of the corporation and who is personally known to me. Notary Public Print My Commission Expires: By: SFWM el '^ Dat . MD Off' Pro urement ate: ~' Lease Agreement No. C-10485 -Page 12 of 13 w.r/~ LESSEE: ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By: Paula Lewis, Chair Date: As to LESSEE: Print Name: Date: STATE OF FLORIDA, ST. LUCIE COUNTY As to LESSEE: Print Name: Date: The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this day of 19 by Paula Lewis, Chair, Board of County Commissioners, who is personally known to me. (SEAL) Notary Public Print My Commission Expires: Approved as to Form and Legality By: County Attorney Lease Agreement No. C-10485 -Page 13 of 13 EXHIBIT "A" IN~IAN RNER LA~i00N 1 xogTS ~ s~.~vArnvas •y B~ . SOR ADDTITON 0'I~R CONSBRV AREAS ~ _ GL~1 OiAtl0Y6 INDIAlIItl.AaMAt \./ Exhibit "A" Tract No. FV-100-011 <'~, All that part of the Northerly 466.41 feet of Fractional Section 9, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, as measured along the centerline of State Road AlA, lying East of said State Road AIA. AND The Southerly 628.09 feet of Fractional Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, as measured along the centerline of State Road A-1-A, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying East of State Road AlA. Indian River Lagoon\Krantz, Christ and George ORB 357, Pg 412 ORB 981, Pg 1392 H:\data\100-01 l.lgl June 27, 1997 Revised: June 29, 1998 Exhibit "A" Tract No. FV-100-001 All that part of Fractional Section 5, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida (being a part of lands described in Official Records Book 282, Page 980, Public Records of said St. Lucie County); bounded on the North by the North line of said Section 5; bounded on the East by the Westerly right of way line of State Road A-1-A, and bounded on the South by the Northerly Mean High Water Line of Little Mud Creek and bounded on the West by the Easterly Mean High Water Line of the Indian River. Indian River Lagoon\Lucerne Corporation H:\data\ 100-001.Ig1 July 10, 1997 Revised: June 29, 1998 Exhibit "A" Tract No. FV-100-002 All that part of Fractional Section 5, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida (being a part of lands described in Official Records Book 282, Page 980, Public Records of said St. Lucie County); bounded on the East by the Westerly right of way line of State Road A-1-A; bounded on the South by the North line of the South 2889.8 feet of said Section 5, as measured along the Easterly line thereof; and bounded on the West by the Easterly Mean High Water Line of the Indian River and bounded on the North by the Southerly Mean High Water Line of Little Mud Creek. Indian River Lagoon\Lucerne Corporation H:\data\100-002.181 July 10, 1997 Revised: June 29, 1998 Exhibit "A" Tract No. FV-100-003 All that part of Fractional Sections 4 and 5, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida (being a part of lands described in Official Records Book 282, Page 980, Public Records of said St. Lucie County); bounded on the North by the North line of said Section 5; bounded on the East by the Westerly Mean High Water Line of the Atlantic Ocean; bounded on the South by the North line of the South 2889.8 feet of said Sections 4 and 5 as measured along the Section line common to said Sections; and bounded on the West by the Easterly right of way line of State Road AlA. Indian River LaBoon\Lucerne Corporation H:\data\ 100-003.181 July 10, 1997 Revised; June 29, 1998 `fir' Exhibit "A" Tract No. FV-100-004 n,.r0' All that part of the North 1002.14 feet of the South 2889.8 feet of fractional Sections 4 and 5, in Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying West of State Road A-1-A. Indian River Lagoon\Oshawa Holding Corp. ORB 353, Pg 971 H:\data\100-004.Ig1 June 27, 1997 Revised: June 29, 1998 Exhibit "A" Tract No. FV-100-005 ~..~'' All that part of the North 1002.14 feet of the South 2889.8 feet of fractional Sections 4 and 5, in Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying East of State Road A-1-A. ~„ Indian River Lagoon\Oshawa Holding Corp. ORB 353, Pgt 971 H:\data\100-OOS.IgI June 27, 1997 Revised: June 29, 1998 Exhibit "A" Tract No. FV-100-006 ~../ All that part of the North 361.74 as measured along the centerline of State Road A-1-A of the South 1887.80 feet (as measured at right angles) of Fractional Sections 4 and 5, in Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying West of State Road A-1-A. Indian River Lagoon\University of Florida and University of Notre Dame ORB 1021, Pg 1338 H:\data\100-006.1g1 June 27, 1997 Revised: June 29, 1998 err' Exhibit "A" Tract No. FV-100-007 All that part of the North 361.74 as measured along the centerline of State Road A-1-A of the South 1887.80 feet (as measured at right angles) of Fractional Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying East of State Road A-1-A. Indian River Lagoon\University of Florida and University of Notre Dame ORB 1021, Pg 1338 H:\data\100-007.181 _= June 27, 1997 Revised: June 29, 1998 Exhibit "A" Tract No. FV-100-008 'ark All that part of the North 973.31 feet (being the same as the North 1053.49 feet as measured along the centerline of State Road A-1-A) of the South 1553.59 feet of Sections 4 and 5, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying West of said State Road A-1-A. Indian River Lagoon\North American Co. Ltd. St. Lucie County Tax Rotl H:\data\100-008.181 June 27, 1997 Revised: June 29, 1998 Exhibit "A" Tract No. FV-100-009 `or/ All that part of the North 973.31 feet (being the same as the North 1053.49 feet as measured along the centerline of State Road A-1-A) of the South 1553.59 feet of Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying East of said State Road A-1-A. Indian River Lagoon\North American Co. Ltd. St. Lucie County Tax Roll H:\data\100-009.Ig1 June 27, 1997 Revised: June 29, 1998 Exhibit "A" Tract No. FV-100-010 All that part of the Northerly 466.41 feet of Fractional Sections 8 and 9, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, as measured along the centerline of State Road AlA, lying West of said State Road AlA. AND The Southerly 628.09 feet of Fractional Sections 4 and 5, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, as measured along the centerline of State Road A-1-A, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying West of State Road AIA. Indian River Lagoon\Krantz, Christ and George ORB 357, Pg 412 ORB 981, Pg 1392 H:\data\100-010.1g1 June 27, 1997 Revised: June 29, 1998 IP 35 crn 1TN 32 33 €, ~i =R i ~z 1C ~~~ .~ a~~o w U N oa~~ ~aaF oz~~' a~ a ~~ ~~ A~ W o= ~ ~o ~ W N .p ~~> O~ O QQ QC7~p~0o <Z2`pQ~O aaN ~`xV~ Z~pm ZS ~gZd~<U< aOQapQ a~~ ;~ Qc~ ~ W ~~ 3 ~yz 0 ~•~ '~~. ;.-. ~:t O!:'' ~ ~- I ~ >~~ ,~ ~, kl~llr.dofk.map DIIAW INO N0. N/EET 1 OF 1 ~rrr+" EXHIBIT "B" '`r.~ r ~• C P C F~Or'ICIa Exotic Pest Plant Council's X997 - List of Florida's Most invasive Species Purpose: To focus attention on: 1. The impacts exotic pest plants have on native bio-diversity in Florida ecosystems. 2. The impact of exotic pest plants on the integrity of native plant community functions. 3. Habitat losses due to exotic plant infestations. 4. The impacts of exotic plants on endangered species via habitat loss and alteration (e.g., Cape Sa~tile seaside sparrow). 5. The need to prevent such losses by comprehensive management for exotic pest plants. 6. The socioeconomic impacts of exotic pest plants (e.g., increased wildfires in Melaler~ca). 7. Changes in the seriousness of different exotic pest plants over time. 8. The need to provide information that will help managers set priorities for management. )efrnit7ons: Exotic-a non-indigenous species, or one introduced to this state, either purposefully or ccidentally; it then escaped into the wild in Florida where it reproduces on its own either sexually or sexually. Native-a species already occurring in Florida at the time of European contact (1500). ~rt~asitre-is a variable condition defined by the category to which the species is assigned. bbreviations used: fnr "Goy ernmznt listed": P=Prohibited b~~ Fla. Dept. of Fn~'ironmcntal Protection, N=l~ixious ~~•c~:d a_ ,ted b~• Fla. Depr. of Aviculture R Consumer Sen~ices and/or U.S. Department of Agriculture. _._ atcgor. [-Spec,: t;tzt yc ~;~~:cdine u~,, ,~,>n;lnin2 nati~c plant cor,;mwutics,n f=londa This dcfr,irio„ docs,lor,~c/i~on !hc 'O r,OmiC sc i~t,~iN Or C'E'O Err?,~ir~~ rr)n!~~' OI~!l h' ;; ~'Ohl2 n,. hu! Or, ll,c dOCtrrnCnlPd 2C0/O ~iCOI dCntOQ2 fOUCed. ---- --- f--. _._-- scientific Name ~ Common Warne '~ ~LEPPC 1 Government Listed t i R:tnk i _°are ? of ~, :~.crscl~~c~:~t A ro R1B I'A/ ~ Ins-a>~~~~ t'Iani I_ia a I~nl~ai~~~~•w.ll~hlk'..u+'. •.~7h.i htr. A6rusprecatorir~ ~ Rosary pea I Acacia auriculifornris ~ Earleaf acacia I - ~.4lbizia lebbeck ;I Woman s tongue ~ l -- . .4rdisia crenata (=,4_ crenulata) .coral ardisia l Ardisia elliptica (A. humilis) ~ shoebutton ardisia I Asparagus dens~orus - ..................:...................................... .................. ~ as ara s fern P ~ I f Bauhinia variegata ~ orchid tree ~ -......_.........-_..---•--..~..._-.. . -- ---_- Bischofra javanica - - -- - - - -- - - .........._...---•--•--•--•-_--._. bischofia `l.. ~~ I ~~ Brachiaria mutica _ ( _ Urochloa mutica) _ _ . . -- .._..._.._... :Para grass I = ~ Calophyllum antillanum (=C. ' santa maria (names "mast I - ~-- calaba, C. inophyllum, often misapplied in cultivation) . ~ wood," "Alexandrian Laurel" ~ used in cultivation) 1 -- . Cassia coluteoides (=Senna pendula) ,, 1j ._ .-.--------~ ----__...._......._ _ ;climbing cassia, Christmas I :cassia, Christmas senna ~~ :, ~ '- ~I Casuarina equisetifolia I _ --~ p •---- .........................._..._------------ 1 ~ Australian pine ~l Casuarina glauca - $~ suckering Australian pine I = p I Cestrum diurnum :day jasmine ~- I Cinnamoinum camphora ~ camphor-tree :~ I `i I Colocasra esculenla I .--.•--__:_..-.--.-_------~_-.--------•--- ~~ wild taro ~ I Colubrina asiatica ~ I ............................................ ~ lather leaf •--------..,~ ............::::::::::::::::::::::::::.~::::::::::::::::::: I :. .. Cupaniopsis a~racardioides ~ 1 ......................................................................... . carrotwood ~ I ~ I ~ ? . ................. I Dioscoreo alata ~ ...................... . ..................... ......................... .................................................:..: : . winged yam ~- ....................................................................... . : : Dioscoreo bulbifera_ .. . . air-potato ........................... ........................... ~- : .Crchhornia crassipes ... ..... _ .. ... ..........._....... _ water hyacinth .. ~ p I L'ugenia unrf7ora .. . .... Sunnam cherry .. .......L .. 1 ~ :........... .. ............................... Ficus microcarpa (=F. uirida; =F. : reru.ra var. nilida) laurel Cg i .............................................. 1 i1........_..-_-------------- -----..__.._. Page 2 of 2, Attachment ~ ~is.ys I ~:~s r., )rll)r:'iww~~'.I)il.)ii r~~r;.~-;iw hrr:r ', f a I-Ij~drilla ~~crticiUata ~I hydrilla I p, N I tr'ygrophila polyspernra 'green I~ygro _ ........................................ - I -PN Hymenaclure amplexicaulis I Wesi lndian marsh grass I ............................ Inrperata cylindrica (=lmperata cogon grass I ~ N brasiliensis) Ipomoea aquotica ~ water spinach '~ p N Jasminurn dichotomum Gold Coast ~asrrune r I ~ L - - •~~ ~~-'~- Jasminum flurninense :jasmine I - -_..___....._ .................•_-- • tana camas :'- Lantana Ligustrum sinense :Chinese privet, hedge privet I Lonicera japonica :[Japanese honeysuckle ~ I ; Lygodium japonicum ~~ Japanese climbing fern I ___._ Lygodium rnicrophyllum 'Old World climbing fern ~ I - l~-~~' -' =•:~~:N': Macfadyena urrguis-cati ;claw vine •-- •••-•-•-.-._.. ____._._.._........... _ ......._.........----------• ................. .. I Melaleuca quinquenervia melaleuca, broad-leaf paper I € P, N ii ~ bark .. ---- ) A~Ielia azedarach - '~ Chinaberry --•----I --.._... _ ; ..__._-------.._---• .............................. ' _ . .... .....................----...-----~ ..._....-.-.. _...1......__.__.._-....--- .... Mimosa pigs ~) catclaw mimosa ', p ~r I , . _...._.......- .................................................._....................:1 :: _ _ _ Nandirra domestica nandina, heavenly bamboo ~ I '; - ........ Nephrolepis cordifolia 'j sword fern ' '~ . - .--__...-..-...._-__..... .---.__-.-.. _ .~-_.-._._.---.._..__.....___._..___..--:._:. ___:___--.L_ ....................._._._.........-.._..-_....... -....__....._.....-...I_._.-_.__~~ :...._._.::.--:::_::::::::::::. Neyraudia reynaudiarra ~~ Burma reed; cane grass I ' ~Paederia foetida ~I skunk vine i ............................................. I ~~ ~~ Parricurn repens ~ torpedo grass ~i ............................................ ?I ) Perrnisetum prirpureum ? 1~iapier grass 'I ` 1 .....__....... _........._ ................._......................:..........................;1.. ...................................... . Pistia stratiotes water lettuce I IP (.................................................... ............ .. `l it Psidium cattleranum (P littorale) ~ strawberry ava ............. ............................................. ....... _ ~ I 1 ... _ .: . _ _::::: ... '~ Psidn~nr g7~ejava 'i gti3va I I ...:::.: ~ ........................................... .. ... , _ _.. _..._ .. Puerai-ra montei)e_(=1'. lobate) ~ l.~)d~u ~I .. IZhodomyrtris to~~rentosa I down} rose-myrtle I I I~::_:_. ...:::. _ ......... _ ~ .... ----' 1 ... . Pago 3 of t , Attaclinent ~~ .. + ~ ~ j IZhucu shathacca_(=1~. discolor) I•- (Sapium sehiferun) oyster plant ---------...--.-....- ......................................-....- ~~ .-....-. i-.--.-= I-_ popcorn tree, Chinese tallow € 1 tree Scaevola sericea (=Scuevola scaevola, half-flower, beach ~ I raccada var. sericea, S. frutesce~zs; ~ naupaka ~ S sericea) Schefflera actinophylla ( Brassaia ~ sche$7era I actinophylla) Schirius terebinthifolius :Brazilian pepper '~ j p~ N "" . • Solarium tampicense (=S. ~ aquatic soda apple I -. houstonir~. Sola~TUm torvum ~ turkey berry I N Solanum vianem s tropical soda apple ~I N Syrygium cumirii_ jambolan, Java plum ~I ;; - -- - _....__... ._~_.__._._._ t---- ~ - _ _ Tectaria incisa ~ incised halberd fern '~ • i Thespesia populnea_ ._ ~ seaside mahoe = ~'"'~"°'~"~--------_._..__ •----~---•-•---.~._.--~~-•----..._ ...................._--~---- ~ ~ I I Tradesca~rtia,fluminensis white-flowered wandering I ., • . dew Categor~~ II-Species that have shorn a potential to disrupt native plant communities. These species may become ran,Ced as Category I, but have no(yer demonstrated disruprron of natural Florida comnurnilies. I 1 I Scientific I~'ame .. .. ~~ Common name FLEPPC Government Listed i I Rank ~, ~ _ ~ ~ ................................................. .. .. .. ...................................... ...... ... ~~ Adenanthera pm~otuna :red sandlewood ......................................... ~ II ~ Agave sisa/ana sisal hemp ................. . II ,I ... A/bizia jr/librissin . . mi mosa II '~ :'I Aleuritcs jordri ___......_ ~ _._.. _ _. _ tuns all trey I ii Alstonia n,acrol~hylla d it ~ ... !. c.~ -tree ~ II Pale 4 0` L, ^~-rachment A G/5/9S 12:OG I'M . i1M1/W ` A/tei•„anlhcra~Jhi/n.rer~id~s alligator weed II '- I......_.._.._._-......._......_.......-..............._._......_....... . nl,gonon leptoprs ~~ coral vine II _ ; riS(O oc/ria lillora/is ••~~~~` calico floes-cr II ....................................................... :: Asystasia ga,rgetica_ ~--~- . ~ Ganges primrose II .- hur, f~w~~~~'.1~~r~.q~'~^J7Ls~.him Broussonetia papyrifera ~ paper mulberry II ~~ -•------`~- Callisia a ans ~ ~ ., ~' - ; Inch plant, spironema -- II -- Casum-ina cunninghcrmiana ~ Australian pine II = p Cereus undatus •--' s night-blooming cereus :'• - -- --•------•~ II •-- - f Cleroderzdr-orr burr ei g -- - -~ ' strong-scented glorybower :: ~'~ II :: C toste 'a mach ascariensis r~ ~ g - - -~ ~ rubber vine `~ R Cyperus ~~ umbrella plant - I~ alternifolius .~. (=C. irrvolucratus '~ " ............................. ~' Cyperusprolifer ~~ ~- dwarf papyrus .. -- -------''~~------- - - II ~' Dalbergia sissoo ~~ °- = Indian dalbergia, sissoo ~' -------- --~------------- - - - II ~~ nterolobium contortisliquunr ------- . =' ear- od tree ~' :; P --- ~ __ -- II _: - pipremnr~m pinrratr,m cv- Aureum '= pothos '' ------- II ~ --- '~Ficus altissima ~- :s false banyan .. .. _ -------•----------•-------------- II Ficr~s benjamina_ ~~ wee in fi :: p g g ~ :. II ~ Ficus religiosa :: :: '~ bo tree '~ ~~ :: :: ~- - --- - - II 's F/acor~rtia irrdico .................. .......... .. .. ~ governor's plum ~~ .. :: .. -...II'.--... = Flueggea vrrosa ~ flue ea gg ~ ~ ~' -------- - II If b seas tiliacer,s ..................... ..... mahoe II . ~prage benghalc,rsis ...... ..... hYPtage ~~ ...... II Jasmi,u,nr sombac _ .......................................... Arabianjasnune ~ ............................................ II _ ~'ocireurerin clegans ~ :~ __ .............................. . . Bolden shower tree __... __ II -:: __ 1 ' e„cae,ra /cucoc~pha/a - :: .... .--- -- .-__. --- --"------ ~.~~ ~~ ~~-~ ~~~~- ---~~- _ lead tree I I :...;; ~ r~snri„r japo,ricunr ~ - Japanese Privet ...::: II Page 5 of 8, Attacl~rnent n bs,~s iz.o~ 1'~( 1Ti•r Invaxnc I'L•up I.~a .+ k Ligr~sL-gun lucidun~ ........... . Glossy privet ............................. -- Melinis minut~ :: :- :: II -•-- ::................... ~: - ora molasses grass ............ -.- " II . Merremia tuberoses ' .. -: -- - -~~•---•••-••-•-•---••-•---.-..... s = wood-rose ~' - II •• urraya paniculatcr_ " orange jasmine .-"-'~ -.. -'• jI Myriophyllum spicatum = Eurasian water-ttulfoil -:' II ~:'• p Nephrolepis mult~ora - - Asian sword fern °°-~'°'°'---'---~-- ~° jI -_ r.. ._ - .. -- . Ochrosia parviflora (=0. elliptica) ----...~;--. :: :: ko sia p :: -----•--...._ .............__...-------.........---........._.. ~: =° _ II Oeceoclades maculates ~~ '€ ground orchid `` II Paederia craddczriana '~ sewer vine, onion vine " II Pass~ora, foetida stinking passion-flower II - oenix reclinata ~ reclining date palm II -' Pittosporum penta~7drzrm ~ pittosporum =° :: ---. rI -• Pittosporum tobira ~~ Japanese pittosporum :: ---------- Ij Rhynchelytrum repens ................. ~~ Natal grass .................... =-"-~ ~~ ~ ~-~~-~~- -' II Sansevieria hyaci~rthoides =S. _( ............ . ~~ s` bowstring hemp ,______-- .. ................................................. II trifctsciata) _ Solanum diphyllum :: i l ...: .. .................. ................................. tw n eaf nightshade ~~ II Solarrum jamaicense '' Jamiaca nightshade ~~ II S n o~rium odo h llum }' 8 P P y ..................................................... _ .. ........... ~- arrowhead vine ~---~,- ~-~~----- ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ II yrygium jarnbos_ ~ rose-apple .: € II ;s . ..... _-....-1__.-.... _.... _.- I Terrr~inalia cata o ~ PP ;'tropical almond _- ~_ ~° :: ~ II Tribli/us cisloides ..................................................... ~ -- _ ~ -•• - .' -.-- .. ~----- -~ ----.-~---~ -.---.- ---.-- .~ - ....... ...... _. puncture vine, burnut II I Triphasia trifoliata .... ... :lime berry . rena lobara _ _..._ _.. I __ __ - Caesar's ~~'eed ........ '--: II ;( ld'edelia triloba~a _ - _- -- -- _.... ~'edelia __ _ _ '-- _ _ II __ rstena srrrerr.~rc ~.:. ::: ,.. -- hines - _ __ ..... ...... : II :: Page 6 of 3, Actaclunent A - .. + ~ n Xai~! hosoma sagillifolium hl Ir://~~1~w.ll~hlx.<i~ g~'J71ui.hi m ~~ melanga, elephant ear II Return to FLCPI ~ Home Page Page 7-of 8, Attac~nent ~ G~s~s 1 z cx~ r:~l ~ .. t ,~ nlelt.e Aau.ua pt r tt....•»t t . + .~t.a. (1) Gus t Ptahibil•C Aquaria Ptwnta-Una+r no atraanrtano•r Wro U..a. ap.d•. b. pormlaad br pOrr .ttaOrl ooArcton tr,an.cportaCOn. cuNv3t.on, and h•.porutlon .z ;. pt u prwid+d n Ruse 18C•62t]o•c, F.A,C.: S~IEIdTIF1G NAMES CtChtl.~tON twMES rUl.ma~tnars ph:laxrroidaz AllipalDrwooQpr..n f+3d plant Ca,tuartna sW. Au.Oall'ur PI,.. . CrautLa h•lmru Swamp ttnrw'QOp E~ohhorrva rPp. w.t.rhnonf}, ' i~ydripa v+rrtialwa Hrd'iLL r•loeid,a alodaa.atzrttz.cz, oxyp •tt prasr !/znlo.a adtsafrcz Water spinarlt lpomoa~ LuWoaa LsparosyYton rpp, African alod+a Lrrtrtoeriarir Dave Sarvah Oow~ rush Lytrvu~t cafiraria pur'•><a Eoosast/ifv Mlldauca PvinQvanlrNa EAalalrruca M.inora piyra I,s:anf sansi4v+ tAanltal't a•w Alanodtaia Aa.tlru ltortoc~oria vagina&r A~•»opnyqum rpiatum Eurasian rratan'tiilaR NatJaanaar>da aa.rJ'tiroia an. n.toot~n weld R.d r1u PorYaaWria rotcndiloda TroQtuJ pldunJ..•.+d Sahirva rppt, (azdu7rtp S. mtnlmaj .$dtKSx (KIf]rfthi(O~trr f3ra2rWl~pp.r Sy.rpartwm Ir.atm E>ooac bur-r.s•d ttrafaor•r aMCar watar•aloataoar pant lrapa tpp, Watarl7tastJlU, .7 Vosri. tvrp%dara Hippo Oress (~ Ctarc II Prottlbltad AquabC Ptantc-Thaa.a cpacl•s va concid.r.d to b• hphly ktvatlw and narlouc h bWi:•d areas of the Scan o! Ftarid.a, Tl+.aa p(artta may ba oule.rtad Sn a rarn•ry rvqufat•d Dy C+. O.oartm•nt of Apnoutnr+r and Coruarm•t ti-•rvlwa parrcuard to , a. 681.A]t, bdt_131, and 581.1<6, F.S_ and troll only b. rdd out of rw• toon aoprvrsl by the OaparLnanl of Apriculwr• antl Consumer 5•Muc, Thas• t~.cl.c shelf nor b• tmpon•d or mu.ct•d kom the w1d. Th.y must t>a oontaJnad b loch a mzvtar w ar u pr.vont the d.as.r*Irution 6vrrt rho rtutasry pramis•t' ' . SCIENTIFIC NAJ.tE6 COMMOIJ NAMES Nr9iodY1< pofy,cP.rma Hyprv Urmopruls c•ttliFora Arnbulta P.ctia rfraliof•c WalMO(NCa ~ . (]1 ~• d•DFr~+•nt is sutrtora,.d to 6oc'prtat. aedtlonal plants to o. pronUit.d trt' ac'nac'0`ncy order ar pt~ovtdad N Rut. -° tcC•62.ot2 F./~C. - (aJ The pcohlbft.d aqu:tlo pfactt Y.at mrt+oAasr tf+a rrtoct n-o+n( .no .cc.pt.d ac4mtfito anQ oortut~on nartraa of tJv prohlblt.d agttatla .. plant cp.d•.c. Ho.r.v,.r, Ct.• prohlbtt.ad ctatuc also s.DplLr to any rynon trn c . (5) Th. d+Darunartt is wttwrtx.d to orx.cle•r.d a pant for --, ~d;Jalon on qu prvhlbftad Pent Gd wf++n tt dLpfayi, a wtv~ f~.r• Ic .. - ca+nuLc .vld+ric• to b.ilrv. tt Dour;! dcpciY to tn. Fbrte.a •rrhorc~.•ctt. - . o~• o. snore of cw fotlo,vinp r3unct•r•'ctlC.c: (a) Th.. t+r~d.nCy b tyf`aa.d of l7•oO~rt~a l'tivuA-. h an •Gn.yzta~Tt a.orn. trT'+c In a riapid a~ann.r, so as to lmparr tfw •co ryat. m'c abtllcy b nn,c;on oy arlarvlQ ltt prooucavxy, d.oompoaldon, ...,1,., f,,,..~ ,...Ll_,1 cydnp anC bu, an0 Larjpty, •rotlorti darorvad atcyp•n mnc.~~-ationt, or lu aUal:Y b m.JntaJn Its •a1s2Tp cp-.dac dv+rctry. (b) TM pr~0•nclty C] hvaG. and 6rnrW a~`tL1<c and ~+vQard •coryat•rru l.-t oC1af ar•u Or In olh•f cvunW•a viVl Otmao.r aSrTtrl/ O U t ct Glon~ Icl ~• a~71ry to cr.ala Grua- mxwco•dfrc cow a morotyplo ctin 6l ..~ru ;~ d.plao. or d+sPny n.tiv. plant Aaat41. a.ccoy ('.cn a.-~C .: uS:t. na:>Uts, InhlDrt val..r droulawn, Nne-•r navtpa ion an7 trrtpatlon, n a•..~.ry r.cri.^t t1-• r.pru Garin lra• of waurwayr. lCJ Tr• vrlty b fatal •rl•ct}v• rrwxQ•rn.nl by pr•a•nt 1--= _' .' I c r au LCalc It ,aiaa ~ a rK a a l a f t n t o a o ttllt l arty n rtrZrvrtat r ry .f1Ona, cuUt as rep.wl•d d1+rn3cil lr.atm.nu al Npn 6o•:p• rat. a, c.n Ixinp a,Otf7 •tl.c:r. m+.na,~-.rra.n(. S p+P/1C Au ~ortry 359,25, 35fl.251 FS. l..a.a Impl•m.ntad ]6p15, )69.25 t fS. F{acy _ N.,r B-i 1-08. Am•norad 6-17-41. Panes R r,F R Arr-a~J~rt~nr .~ ~JC~6 C~Gy AGENDA REQUEST 1 '~10R10a~ TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: ~.r/ ITEM NO. C-5A DATE: May 25, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] PRESENTED BY: Donald B. We , P. E. County Engineer Parcel 76, at The Reserve -Approve Plat and corresponding Subdivision Improvement Agreement. BACKGROUND: Parcel 7B, Torrey Pines at The Reserve is designed as a residential development within the private P.U.D. community, The Reserve. The developers have requested approval of the plat for this phase and wish to record it at this time. Attached is a copy of the contract proposal and plat. A letter of credit in the amount of $225,423.00 has been received by the County as the posted bond for the associated roadway and drainage work. Per the plat, the development will be private and The Reserve Association will have all maintenance responsibility. FUNDS AVAIL.(State type & No. of transaction or N/A): N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: Dec. 15, 1998 Site Plan approved RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the plat and corresponding Subdivsion Improvement Agreement for Parcel 76, at The Reserve and authorize the Chairman to excute the documents subject to final review and approval by the County Attorney. COI' ISSION ACTION: CONC RRENCE: [ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ^---. ouglas M. Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures ~. _. [x1Co. Attorney ~ [x]Originating D .Public Works `1/- [x]Co. Eng. W ~ ~. [x]Co. Surveyor [x]Comm. Dev. [ ]Other [ ]Finance (check for copy only, if applicable) ~n-' ~``~•'~ f`I SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, is entered into this day of 1999, by and between RESERVE HOMES LTD., L. P. (the ``Developer"), and ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, (the "County"). WITNESETH: WHEREAS, the developer is commencing proceedings to effect a subdivision of land in St. Lucie County; and WHEREAS, the Developer intends to record a certain plat of a subdivision in St. Lucie County, Florida, to be known as Pod 7B at the Reserve, P.U.D. I, Toney Pines (the Subdivision"); and WHEREAS, subdivision and platting ordinances of St. Lucie County establish procedures and standards for the development and subdivision of real estate and for the surveying and platting thereof, requiring the installation of certain improvements and providing penalties for violations among other things; and WHEREAS, a final plat of a subdivision within the unincorporated area of St. Lucie County shall not be recorded until the Developer has installed the required improvements or has guaranteed, to the satisfaction of the County, such improvements will be installed; and WHEREAS, the required improvements of the Subdivision are to be installed after recording of the plat under the guarantees posted with the County. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the intent and desire of the Developer as set forth herein, and to gain approval of St. Lucie County to record said plat, the Developer and County agree as follows: 1. COMPLETION OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer agrees to satisfactorily complete the required improvements for the above referenced development within twelve (12) months from and after the recording of the above referenced plat according to the construction plans approved by the County Engineer. The required improvements are more particularly set forth on those certain plans or construction improvements drawn by the Developer's engineers, Lawson, Noble and Webb, Inc., dated April 12, 1999. 2. SECURITY. The Developer, in accordance with the requirements established by the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, agrees to supply the County with security in a form acceptable to the County Attorney in the amount of two hundred twenty five thousand four hundred twenty three and 00/100 dollars ($225,423.00) representing 100% of the estimated cost of the required improvements as submitted by the Developer's engineer and approved by the County Engineer. 3. REDUCTION OF AMOUNT OF SECURITY. The amount of the security may be reduced once during the term of this Agreement upon the completion of a portion of the required improvements by the Developer and upon inspection and acceptance by the County. In no event, however, shall the amount of the security be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of completing the remaining required improvements. 4. SUPERVISION OF CONSTRUCTION. The required improvements shall be constructed under the supervision of the Developer's engineer in full compliance with the specifications and requirements of St. Lucie County, and when complete, Developer's engineer shall furnish the County Engineer with a certificate of satisfactory completion for approval. 5. FAILURE TO COMPLETE IMPROVEMENTS It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties to this Agreement that, in the event said required improvements are not constructed within twelve (12) months from the date of the recording of the above referenced plat, the County shall have and is hereby granted the right to cause the required improvements to be made and to use the security provided herewith for payment of all costs and expenses incurred in the construction thereof, including but not limited to, engineering, surveying, construction, legal and contingent costs. Furthermore, it is agreed by the parties hereto that County shall be reimbursed from the security provided for any damages, either direct or consequential, which the County may sustain as a result of the failure of Developer to carry out and execute all of the provisions of this Agreement and the provisions'of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. In the event of Developer's failure or refusal to construct and install the required improvements in accordance with the terms of this agreement, the County shall have the option to do so, with County employees and equipment, or pursuant to public advertisement and receipt of bids. In the event that the total costs incurred in construction and full completion of the improvements shall exceed the amount of security provided, such additional costs shall be paid by Developer on written demand by the County Engineer. 6. RELEASE OF SECURITY. Upon completion of construction of all required improvements, the Developer's engineer shall certify that the improvements have been constructed in accordance with the regulations set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. When the improvements have been certified by the Developer's engineer, the County Engineer shall inspect the improvements and review the construction and supporting test/control data furnished by the Developer's engineer. If all required improvements are completed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer, the County Engineer shall confirm this in writing to the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners. The Developer's security shall then be released in accordance with Section 11.04.01 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 7. RECORDATION OF PLAT. Following execution of this Agreement by both parties and approval of the form of security by the County Attorney, the County agrees to record the plat of the above referenced Subdivision at such time as the plat complies with the subdivision and platting requirements set forth in Section 11.03.00 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. ~11I' ~' INTERPRETATION: VENUE This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreements between the parties with respect thereto. This Agreement may only be amended by written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by both parties hereto. This Agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit and section headings are for convenience only. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Agreement, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial circuit for St. Lucie County, Florida, for claims under state law and the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed these presents on the dates indicated below. The date of this Agreement shall be the date on which this Agreement is approved by the Board of County Commissioners. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY• DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: WITNESSES: ~., w~TH-k- I ber-I- RESERVE HOMES LTD., L. P. BY: KOLTER PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LLC ~ ,•u 1< r~,- t~ ~ ~ 1~~.~. 1 BY: BE T IN . BY: Print Name: ~D~'~/ ~• L S~IPd Title: U(L! ~/L cS /p•~ /~" ~r.-' SLJNrIYtUST LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER: SFL/P030213 ISSUANCE DATE: APRIL 23, 1999 APPLICANT: RESERVE HOMES, LTD., L_P. 3600 CLUB PLACE BOLA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 BENEFICIARY: ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34982 FOR USD 225,423.00 (TWO HUNDRED TWENTY FIVE THOUSAND FOUR HUNDRED TWENTY THREE 00/100 U.S. DOLLARS) DATE OF EXPIRATION: APRIL 20, 2000 PLACE OF EXPIRATION: OUR COUNTERS WE HEREBY ESTABLISH OUR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NO. SFL/P030213 IN YOUR FAVOR FOR ACCOUNT OF THE ABOVE-REFERENCED APPLICANT AVAILABLE BY YOUR DRAFTS DRAWN ON SUNTRUST BANK, SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A. PAYABLE AT SIGHT FOR ANY SUM OF MONEY NOT TO EXCEED A TOTAL OF THE AMOUNT REFERENCED ABOVE WHEN ACCOMPANIED BY THIS LETTER OF CREDIT AND THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT: BENEFICIARY'S DATED CERTIFICATE PURPORTEDLY SIGNED BY ONE OF ITS OFFICIALS STATING: "RESERVE HOMES, LTD., L.P. DEFAULTED ON ITS OBLIGATIONS TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY RELATING TO POD 7B AT THE RESERVE, PUD 1, TORREY PINES. THE OBLIGATION OF RESERVE HOMES LTD., L.P. CONTRACT (AGREEMENT) BETWEEN RESERVE HOMES, LTD., L.P. AND ST. LUCIE COUNTY DATED APRIL 29, 1998." ALL DRAFTS MUST REFERENCE THE NUMBER AND ISSUE DATE OF THIS CREDIT. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS SUBJECT TO THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS (1993 REVISION), INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PUBLICATION 500. WE HEREBY AGREE WITH YOU THAT ALL DRAFTS DRAWN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT WILL BE DULY HONORED UPON PRESENTATION AND DELIVERY OF THE DOCUMENTS SPECIFIED ABOVE TO SUNTRUST BANK, SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA, C/O SUNTRUST INTERNATIONAL SERVICES, INC., 25 PARK PLACE, 16TH FLOOR, LETTER OF CREDIT DEPT., MC-3706, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 ON OR BEFORE APRIL 20, 2000 SINCERELY, SUNTRUST BANK, SOUTH FLORIDA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION *****CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE***** All correspondence and communication should be directed to our agent SunTrust International Services, Inc., 25 Park Place, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Telex: 542210 910225 (7/96j ~1rr+' Su~TRUST FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA "'~ 1 AUTHORIZE,(~SAI~G ATURE ' ~~S/""'-' V1~° PAGE 2 All correspondence and communication should be directed to our agent SunTrust International Services, Inc., 25 Park Place, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Telex: 542210 sio22s pissl POD "76" AT THE RESE A PARCEL OF LARD LYING IN SECTIO ST. LUCIE JANUARY. 1999 A PARCEI. CF LAND LYDRi N SECTION 22 TOR9tl!! %90U111 RANGE 99 EAST. Si. W WE OOIM'f. R01~11 MD EN6 AIOIE PMtT-LIAJIRY oE9aeEO As FaLLOPIs BEEN AT lIE MFAlECTIDN CF 71E EAST LNE OF 71E PUT OP INWICS PII~lfS~ 1 A10 IT A81~C RECOIp6 SAID n COUITY WI1N TIER 9pmERr LBE a< LEfi77p6 DRIVE A9 DESCReEO BY DEED RECDIpED N sTuA~E o~dxr . T~isart~r v~Ensv~a sim s~am~r ~ t~iES~ wE9TEar tnE aP sAD LE(FJOB om1IE BY T1E Fp101VB10 Two CWBE9 L SOIJIM BBRS'S6' EAST. A DORANCE aF 11AM FEET TO A PORT OF OJNATUE WRN A Qli11E C011CAVE TO T1E lOUTIIIVEST AID XI1VN6 A RAORIS dF ABLA FEET OF SA® QeVC 71W A CEMRALY MfiE OF 90`~S~IN MIG pORANCE Qi 711,69 FEET TO A POM OF NDN-INDIAL NTERSECTidl1VIT11 T1E NOR1N LNE OF TRACT fF:-1 AS OE9Qi~e BY D® RECOIpED N OFFICIAL RECRip BORK 5~2. PAOE$ 2S1 TO 264 PIeLK REORIDB OF SAD sT. LUCE COUTTY RIE RA9R8 PORT BFAIL9 NOR1N 88'96'00' NEST FROM TNS PODIff SAD~NORTN~1~ TRACT~OC~-LSA 00TANCE OFFEET TOTO TIE D~vAmio 9~AD~w1T~N u e7aiia"~ic~oc~TwTVa~ee~9An~EASmr LNE 8r TIE FOLLOWDD Two OpAeE9 l NDRTN 20`O7'tY EAST. A ppTAMCE D/ ~9ASi FEET TO AN ANOIE P08Tf N SAD EASTEAY LOE 2. NdRN 00•]6'OP CAST. A DISTANCE OF 2D.00 FEET TO iNE PON1 OF BE08i81R 001/7/806 lD80 ApE0.1101E OR LEA STATE a FLORDA .' COI-RY OF ST. LUCE ~LA/p OED AND PUTTED IEREW ASP~_AT TIE SADSAD U/OBP TO 9UPAEYm AND PUTTED AS/LS ICwM 1EIE IER®Y OFDIOATES AS FOIlOwS 1, 7NE 910E~/EOIES AND .IDli1 PARN86 EASElE/FTS AS 9NOwN NERECN, FOR A ~. O~ ~ ~ U~TLIT~TTr FIW~OSES~IYY~J. ~ TIEPFIME~T 1M~ aF~ ~ eau~ir . s~NU~ee w 9~ESraF~e;euTY. arn' oR REGARDNO 91181 STREET. 2. 71E PRIVATE ORANAtE EASElElI7S.1S 41D1Iq IElEOII ARE NEAEBY OEDRJTED TO TIE RESERVE A9lOCJATR9V. NC FOR A07E95 AIO ORAD111GE PI/POIES AMD SHALL 8E TIE PEIMETUAL l1ADREVMI4E CBLIQAnON ar SAD ASSOCIAT'IOM M BRAID OF COUIfY OOIMSSIO/EIB OF ST. DICE COURT. SHALL EAR NO RE9P01l~TTY, DUTY OR LIABLITY REGAIDN6 9URI EA90ENiS 1 TFE UTLITY fA9F]ENTS. AS l1DRP1IETEO/L IMY BE USED FY7! U79L[TY AIO ORANAC£ PUMOSES BY ANY UTLI7T. NOLWNO CA,T.V. N COAB'UMO:E WITH SI101 OIDB/ANCES Alp REQLATDNS AS INT E ADOPTED FROM TAE TO TAE BY 71E BRAID Of' 6019/TY C018AtS4I01E1U aF gT. LUpE C01AlT7 AND APPROVED BY 71E RESERVE ASSOCIATDK DG TIE BRAID OF COUlfY COIA853IOfER4 OF gT. LACE 000m, SHALL BEM ND RESPg60LITY. 01J7Y OR LIABLRY RL6eDB6 SIld1 EASEMENTS. a TIE IsLMD TRACTS NOS 1, 2.9. a 6.6, T Alp B AS 91011N IEIEON ARE HEREBY RESERVED BY TIE RESERVE ASSOCUTION. DIG FOR iMnVE ULMD w1DTA7 PRESERVATION AND ARE i1E IAA817EWAIICE OaLwnal aF SAD A490CIATDIL ACTMTITES pR01101TED W11MIN TIE UtMO EA~ITS Dln.l.OE 096TRIICTION OR PLACB6 OF BIN.DBIOS p1 dl ABOVE OROl80 01AP96 OR PLAG96 SOB. OR OTER 91eSTAN1ES SURI AS 7RASIl RFADVAL OR DESTeA:T10N ai TREES. Stoles OR 0T1ER NATTVE vEIETAnaN top REYOVK 6 SOL IMTEJIIAL. S. 11E WATER 11A/1A0ElENT TRACT, AS SNDVYII NEREd R NEREBF DEDICATED TO 7K RESERVE ASSOGATIOII BIG fOR ACCESS AID DAI1DNCf PUP08E$ AID SHALL BE lIE PEIPETIAL 11A0lTENANCE aeLlDAnaN oe sA0 A99aeuTTau TIE eoAno aF eaurtr cwBssldERS of ST. LULE OOIM7, SHALL BEAR NO AESPdeODJTY, DUTY aR LIABLLITY REGARDBIG SU01 EASEIEM3. 6 TRACT OST I.OPEII SPACE TRACT. AS SNRlM iEAEON TS IEREBY OEDIGTED TO TIE TOeET PNES /IOAEOV11ER5 A3.40QAngA NC. FOR OPEN RACE nAro9ES AFp sw.L BE THE PERPETWL INNTENAnrE aeL1DATIDN aF SAD As9ocuTTRN. TIE BoAm aF couRY CW6401E1iS of ST. LUCE CAU(IY, sNAU BEAR NR RESPONSI~m, Darr aR LIABLITY RE6AROD6 sAD TRACT. P O ~ SWEO~BY~P~~DfMP~A~O~ ee AFFTRED IEIEro er AND wRM TIE AUTIpRR'C aF TIE BRAID OF DDECTORS TNL9 DAr of 19s9. DNIXf LLC; ~OIAN VR Ar en ATTEST: STATE OF FLORDA COIITIY OF ST. DICE TIE FCREOOND CERTRIGni OF Ow1ERA~ Alp DEWdTDTN WAS ApDlpw~®® MGK 1! TIES D-Y OF . 1999. SY A/O AONORR.EDGED TO ATO BEFORE -E TINT ME EIEMED SAD NSTRIAE/R AS PRESDOR DF SAD COIp011An01A A10 TINT 71E SEAL AFFDED 1ElET0 BY D1E~AREWaIt 001ld1A7E AUwpR1T'T. AIO TINT SAD B07RU101T R TIE FREE ACT AND ODD Of 3AD OplORATDN. A ( DENfitYdTTON A/D OD T'ANE MI OAMN~ COWRSSDtl N0. ! EI?AAliON DATE N0TIR7 PIeL[C, STATE DF FLORDA PRBIf NANp lNVBIO E1UIOm 1B61RACTS OF TIE TTTLE Alp OOTRUAEMfS API'EM@IO AYON6 TIE PUiIC RECOIp6 OF n. LACE Cp1R17Y, FLORDh TIE UpERSRNED AlT01K7-ATi.AW pLY Ll®® TO PRAC7IDL N T/! STAT! OF FLORDA AID l101w1 wRT1181 PUNT 13~VEST~ED RESERVE Ip~ES LT0. V. A~ FLORDA LOeTED PARTNER916P. IIIBRi NL4 APPARENT RECLID TITLE. 9e.EC7 TO TIE Fg101VN01IOR18ACF Ow1870, 1. PAR7'IFA9W, AE RECdpED N OFFICIAL REOORD l1INRI W~PAL ~~ . PIeLIC RECORDS aF ST. LACE Doom. FLCRDA CERTlffD THIS DAY aF .19991. MI(7 AGENDA REQUEST ~J~~e coGy f/) r+d, 1 '2pR10P. TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BYIDEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: ~~ ITEM NO. C-5B DATE: May 25, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] PRESENTED BY: Donald B. We t, P.E. County Engineer Parcel 20A, at The Reserve -Approve Plat and corresponding Subdivision Improvement Agreement. BACKGROUND: Parcel 20A, Castle Pines at The Reserve is designed as a residential development within the private P.U.D. community, The Reserve. The developers have requested approval of the plat for this phase and wish to record it at this time. Attached is a copy of the contract proposal and plat. A letter of credit in the amount of $329,642.76 has been received by the County as the posted bond for the associated roadway and drainage work. Per the plat, the development will be private and The Reserve Association will have all maintenance responsibility. FUNDS AVAIL.(State type & No. of transaction or N/A): N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: Dec. 15, 1998 Site Plan approved RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the plat and corresponding Subdivsion Improvement Agreement for Parcel 20A, at The Reserve and authorize the Chairman to excute the documents subject to final review and approval by the County Attorney. CO MISSION ACTION: ~uN~ nti"~C: [ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ~` D uglas M. Anderson ounty Administrator Coordination/signatures // [x]Co. Attorney ~/N [x]Originating Dept. Public Works ~ ` / [x]Co. Eng. [x]Co. Surveyor [x]Comm. Dev. '' '\.n- [ ]Other . (!~ 1 [ ]Finance (check for copy only, if applicable) SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT THIS SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT, is entered into this day of 1999, by and between RESERVE HOMES LTD., L. P. (the "Developer"), and ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, (the "County"). WITNESETH: WHEREAS, the developer is commencing proceedings to effect a subdivision of land in St. Lucie County; and WHEREAS, the Developer intends to record a certain plat of a subdivision in St. Lucie County, Florida, to be known as Pod 20A at the Reserve, P.U.D. II, Castle Pines (the Subdivision"); and WHEREAS, subdivision and platting ordinances of St. Lucie County establish procedures and standards for the development and subdivision of real estate and for the surveying and platting thereof, requiring the installation of certain improvements and providing penalties for violations among other things; and WHEREAS, a final plat of a subdivision within the unincorporated area of St. Lucie County shall not be recorded until the Developer has installed the required improvements or has guaranteed, to the satisfaction of the County, such improvements will be installed; and WHEREAS, the required improvements of the Subdivision are to be installed after recording of the plat under the guarantees posted with the County. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the intent and desire of the Developer as set forth herein, and to gain approval of St. Lucie County to record said plat, the Developer and County agree as follows: 1. COMPLETION OF REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS. The Developer agrees to satisfactorily complete the required improvements for the above referenced development within twelve (12) months from and after the recording of the above referenced plat according to the construction plans approved by the County Engineer. The required improvements are more particularly set forth on those certain plans or construction improvements drawn by the Developer's engineers, Lawson, Noble and Webb, Inc., dated April 12, 1999. 2. SECURITY. The Developer, in accordance with the requirements established by the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, agrees to supply the County with security in a form acceptable to the County Attorney in the amount of three hundred twenty nine thousand six hundred forty two and 76/100 dollars ($329,642.76) representing 100% of the estimated cost of the required improvements as submitted by the Developer's engineer and approved by the County Engineer. 3. REDUCTION OF AMOUNT OF SECURITY. The amount of the security may be reduced once during the term of this Agreement upon the completion of a portion of the required improvements by the Developer and upon inspection and acceptance by the County. In no event, however, shall the amount of the security be less than one hundred percent (100%) of the cost of completing the remaining required improvements. 4. SUPERVISION OF CONSTRUCTION. The required improvements shall be constructed under the supervision of the Developer's engineer in full compliance with the specifications and requirements of St. Lucie County, and when complete, Developer's engineer shall furnish the County Engineer with a certificate of satisfactory completion for approval. 5. FAILURE TO COMPLETE IMPROVEMENTS. It is further understood and agreed by and between the parties to this Agreement that, in the event said required improvements are not constructed within twelve (12) months from the date of the recording of the above referenced plat, the County shall have and is hereby granted the right to cause the required improvements to be made and to use the security provided herewith for payment of all costs and expenses incurred in the construction thereof, including but not limited to, engineering, surveying, construction, legal and contingent costs. Furthermore, it is agreed by the parties hereto that County shall be reimbursed from the security provided for any damages, either direct or consequential, which the County may sustain as a result of the failure of Developer to carry out and execute all of the provisions of this Agreement and the provisions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. In the event of Developer's failure or refusal to construct and install the required improvements in accordance with the terms of this agreement, the County shall have the option to do so, with County employees and equipment, or pursuant to public advertisement and receipt of bids. In the event that the total costs incurred in construction and full completion of the improvements shall exceed the amount of security provided, such additional costs shall be paid by Developer on written demand by the County Engineer. 6. RELEASE OF SECURITY. Upon completion of construction of all required improvements, the Developer's engineer shall certify that the improvements have been constructed in accordance with the regulations set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. When the improvements have been certified by the Developer's engineer, the County Engineer shall inspect the improvements and review the construction and supporting test/control data furnished by the Developer's engineer. If all required improvements are completed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer, the County Engineer shall confirm this in writing to the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners. The Developer's security shall then be released in accordance with Section 11.04.01 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 7. RECORDATION OF PLAT. Following execution of this Agreement by both parties and approval of the form of security by the County Attorney, the County agrees to record the plat of the above referenced Subdivision at such time as the ~ ~ plat complies with the subdivision and platting requirements set forth in Section 11.03.00 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. INTERPRETATION: VENUE This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreements between the parties with respect thereto. This Agreement may only be amended by written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by both parties hereto. This Agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit and section headings are for convenience only. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Agreement, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial circuit for St. Lucie County, Florida, for claims under state law and the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed these presents on the dates indicated below. The date of this Agreement shall be the date on which this Agreement is approved by the Board of County Commissioners. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPUTY CLERK WITNESSES: .~ i+ r w I b e r~- ~,~,~. . 1' A~ y ~vne "z-l BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: RESERVE HOMES LTD., L. P. BY: KOLTER PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT LLC BY: BEE S BY: Print Name• ~(0 ~~/ C- G S/l ~U Title: U (L~ /2~1io~ ~' i Su~fI'ausT r.r/' LETTER OF CREDIT NUMBER: SFLP030212 ISSUANCE DATE: APRIL 20, 1999 APPLICANT: RESERVE HOMES, LTD., L.P. 3600 CLUB PLACE BOLA RATON, FLORIDA 33496 BENEFICIARY: ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34982 FOR USD 329,642.76 (THREE HUNDRED TWENTY NINE THOUSAND SIX HUNDRED FORTY TWO 76/100 U.S. DOLLARS) DATE OF EXPIRATION: APRIL 20, 2000 PLACE OF EXPIRATION: OUR COUNTERS WE HEREBY ESTABLISH OUR IRREVOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NO. SFLP030212 YOUR FAVOR FOR ACCOUNT OF THE ABOVE-REFERENCED APPLICANT AVAILABLE BY YOUR DRAFTS DRAWN ON SUNTRUST BANK, SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A. PAYABLE AT SIGHT FOR ANY SUM OF MONEY NOT TO EXCEED A TOTAL OF THE AMOUNT REFERENCED ABOVE WHEN ACCOMPANIED BY THIS LETTER OF CREDIT AND THE FOLLOWING DOCUMENT: BENEFICIARY'S DATED CERTIFICATE PURPORTEDLY SIGNED BY ONE OF ITS OFFICIALS STATING: "RESERVE HOMES, LTD., L.P. DEFAULTED ON ITS OBLIGATIONS TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY RELATING TO POD 20A AT THE RESERVE, PUD II, CASTLE PINES. THE OBLIGATION OF RESERVE HOMES LTD., L.P. CONTRACT (AGREEMENT) BETWEEN RESERVE HOMES, LTD., L.P. AND ST. LUCIE COUNTY DATED APRIL 29, 1998." ALL DRAFTS MUST REFERENCE THE NUMBER AND ISSUE DATE OF THIS CREDIT. THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS SUBJECT TO THE UNIFORM CUSTOMS AND PRACTICE FOR DOCUMENTARY CREDITS (1993 REVISION), INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE PUBLICATION 500. WE HEREBY AGREE WITH YOU THAT ALL DRAFTS DRAWN IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT WILL BE DULY HONORED UPON PRESENTATION AND DELIVERY OF THE DOCUMENTS SPECIFIED ABOVE TO SUNTRUST BANK, SOUTH FLORIDA, N.A., FT. LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA, C/O SUNTRUST INTERNATIONAL SERVICES, INC., 25 PARK PLACE, 16TH FLOOR, LETTER OF CREDIT DEPT., MC-3706, ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 ON OR BEFORE APRIL 20, 2000 SINCERELY, SUNTRUST BANK, SOUTH FLORIDA, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION *****CONTINUED ON NEXT PAGE***** All correspondence and communication should be directed to our agent SunTrust International Services, Inc., 25 Park Place, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Telex: 542210 siozzs piss) ~'' SU1~I~ZUST ^ FORT LAUDERDALE , FLORIDA (J~ AUTHORIZ SIGNATURE r~~CJ~~' ~'S ~ /LCD ~ PAGE 2 ~S `..r+~ All correspondence and communication should be directed to our agent SunTrust International Services, Inc., 25 Park Place, Atlanta, Georgia 30303 Telex: 542210 s~ozzs Gigs) POD 20A A PARCEL OF UND LY91G Bi SECTION Z7. 70MB1~ 9i SOUT1t RANGE ~ EAST. ST. LOGE COURT, fL01rmA MD 8E9iG IIOIE PAATICU.ARLT OESQtlfD A9 FOLLOw9 NORTH 03•STtT WEST, RA04L TO SAD GAVE. A DISTANCE Oi IOO.OD FEET TO A POD/r N A CLNVE CONCAVE Tp THE NOR7IRYEST, INVDIG A RADBA OF 95000 FEET AID COIIICEIFrRIC winl SAD GIVE IIAVDD A RADRIS OF 1050.00 FEET. SAD PO91f BEINB TIE POM OF BEO9iOD AIO SAD OJNE INVBO A RAOR/S OF 95000 FEET AL90 BESO A PORTION Oi TIE NORTIEIIY RpR-OF- wAY LS! aF SAD OOIAEIICE CEMIE ON111E: TIENfi EASTERLY. KONG TIE AT THE RESET A PARCEL OF LAND LYDVG IN SECTION ST. LUCIE C JANUARY. 1999 W VAr1ES5 VilElEOF, TIE ABOVE HALED PARTNER91tP IIAS CAIAED T/ESE PAESENTS TO BE SII9ED BY ITS PRESmENf AIO ITS CORPORATE 9EAL TO ~ AFFDEp IEIETO Br AIO Mf1TN TK AUIIORITY OF TIE BOARD OF DSECT0O4 rlas aY of r993 aE~RUE /Dlea Lr0. v. er: BOLTER PNpPENTY DEVELOPIEIR LLC: BY FEEOMII V15TA, OIG 8Ts R~>IB SCUM 19'93'!9' 1VES7, A R. A DISTMRCE O/ 8719E i 12SBT FEET; THENCE SOIR 90LTM l7V319' EAST. A PoRTIGN aF TIE SAID PROPO.gD NdITEIiT R[OIf-0F-wAT LSE C COIB.EIICE CEMIE DRIVE; TElA'E TMVERSSi6 SAD NOI7IER7 RR WAY lDE 9Y TIE FGJ.OYVSO FOUL 001/BES L NORTEA4TflLY, ALONG TIE ARC OF SAD GAVE INVDO A MDR3 Of 70500 FEET. TIIU A CENiMI AM3E OF OS2E79' M ARC DISTANCE OF 1L6S FEET M A POM Oi TANOFJKY WITH A NORTH 68'31'91' EAST. ALONG SAD l9E A DISTANCE OF SSB.B6 FEET TO A P08R OF CUIVATIBE WITH A dAVE OONCaVE TO T1E SOIRIEA3T AND INV9O A RAD1LL9 Oi 85500 FEET 31CRTIEASTEItY AND EA9TEILY, ALOIO TIE ARC OF SAD GAVE. rlwll • mRnAL ANILE a lmsr M ARC DISTANT of 2B31S FEET TO A POM OF TAMGOICT TYITN A LDE; • NORTH B6'EI'S1' EAST. ALp16 SAD IRE, A DISTANCE of 9DA7 FEET TO TIE PODff Oi BE60101G CON7ADIDY 13770 ACRES, 11011E OR lE93 STATE OF ROROA OOURY OF ST. LUCE RESERVE IOIES LTD. V. A FLORDA COATED PMIIERS!!. OYYIEN OF T!E LAND OESCR^ED AID PLATTED /EAEM AS POD 2OA AT TIE RESERVE, PLO 6 BEDIG DI ST. U1CE MlwrY, FLORDA, IIAS CAl1SED SAD LANDS TO BE 9A11EYED AND RATTED A3 SiDNM IEIEON AND IERmT DFDXJITE4 AS FOLLOF/9 L TIE DiGRE9B/EUESS MD JODIf PYIf910 EA9EAEIFTS AS 9DIIN IEIE01l FOR ACCE56, DRAOIATf MO UfLITY PURPOSES9M11 ~NR+ERPETNL 1IA9(TEi1AI1LE 00.1GATNIN OF SAD ASSOCGTipt TIE BOAIID OF COURY a sr.IIKE cDlA/rr, 91ALL BEAR NO RESPOl6ea.ln, Dtltr OR LIABLIT' REOAIODD SI1O1 STREET. 2. TIE PRNA7E ORADIACf EASEAEN(fi AS 91DARi NEREdA ARE 1ERERY OEDIG1Tm TO TIE RESERVE A990CUTDIL RIG FOR ACCESS A1D DRADIAfiE P16POSES AND SIfALL ~ TIE PEIPETLNL RAAB/TE.IIAIICE OBLIDATp110F SAID A980CUTfORA TIE BOWD OF COINrY CO1R OF ST. LUCE OOIAIr7, SI1A1.1 SEAR ND IE.40IAmWTY, DNT OR LIABLITY REGAIppO 9101 EA9EAEI/r5 3 TIE UfOITY EASEIENTS AS SIORw lEREdA MAY 8E USED FOR UfO1TY AID DRADiATE PUPOSES BY ANY IROITY, 9ROL1D016 CA.T.V. N COAPLLANLE YVITN SUQi ORD9MNCES AND REIU.ATIONS AS MAY ~ ADOPTED FRpI TDE TO TDE ST TIE BOAIID OF COLMY CONASSIOIERS OF ST. LIKE COUR7 MD APPIIDYED SY TIE RESERVE A590CIATN711 DIC TIE BOAIO OF CO1MY COIAASSIOIEgS aF ST. LUOE LOUITY, SWILL BEM NO IESPOIROLITY, DIlI7 OR LIABLITY REGARODO SUOI EASEIEWTi t THE IPLAID TRACTS LOS L L 3 4, AIO 5 AS SNORM IEREON ARE RfJFBY RE9ERVE0 BY TIE RE9ERYE ASSOCIATION, DIG FOR NATIVE ULND NA9ITAT PRE9FIIVATION AIO AIE THE AIAMEIMNfE OBLDATION OF SAD ASSOGAT[ON. ACTMTITES PIIpImITED Y/17lOI TIE 1RAID FASEIENT4 DIRIDE CGBT9KTION OR R.ACB10 a BIID.DDOS 011 OR ABOVE TAOU'Q ouAPDD a PLACSa mL art oTIER 9ASTANCFS 91G1 AS TRIL4! RE110VAL OR DESTRUCTION OF TREES, SINIffi OR OTHER 1NT1VE VEGETATION AIO RLTAOVAL OF 5OO INTEARAL. S TIE WATER 1AAl1AffLEM TRACT N0. 1, A$ SHORN 1ElE0N M IEREBY OEDIGTEp TO TN-e RESERVE A~OWATION DRG FOR ACCESS AID ORADBME PUPOSES NO 9W1LL B£ TIE PERPETLVIL IAI10irEI111N0E aR1LIG117I011 aF SAD ASSOGATDN TIE 1DAIO a COURT DoAtASUaNERS aF sr. LUCIE colArrT, 91ALL BEAR NO RESPDNSro3IT'r. Darr aR LIAraTT REOARD06 SUD1 EASEMENTS S TRACT OST 1 , OPEiJ SPACE TRACT, AS SNOFM HEREON IS HEREBY OEDITdTED 70 TIE CASTLE P0E5 NO4EOWIER3 ASSOCIATIOIL BIC. FOR OPEN SPACE Pl6POSE3 AND SWILL BE TIE PERPETWI. IIA0ITENAIICE 00.1INTKN OF SAD AMOCIATipI TIE BONG OF LOLNTY COMASSIOTERS OF ST. LLICIE COIMT, SWILL BEM ND RESPOF6DLITY, 01lTY OR LIABLITT REGARDOIG SAID TRACT. STATE OF FLORDA COLNI7 aF ST. LIKE TIE FORETAM/6 QIRIFIGTE OF ONIERSIP A1D OE01O1TION wA3 AawoRL.mGEO eESaRE 1AE 7IR4 ar aF .1999. Br AND AGOD9RF'p® TO AID BEFOIE IE T/NT NE E71EQR®9AD MiRAENf AS PRESOEIR OF SAD Opp01tATD1A AID TINT TIE 9EAL AADED HERETO IS THE CORPORATE SEAL Q SAD CORPOIUITDIL 1INT 1T WAS AFFDED IE1ETO 9Y OLE AIO REOLLM COIORATE ALTI110RITY, IMO wMT SAD S6TRAEIR D T1E FREE ACT AND 0®Oi SAD COIIORATIpL Ei [ 1 PERSONYIY IO/OIYN TO LE. OR < ) IIAS PIIOOU® AS OENTFICAT70N AND DD TAKE AN OATH COMA59W N0. ! f1PBNT10N DATE NOTARY PtAiIC, STATE OF RORIDA PRSiT IMIE: 1NVDD E%AIRIm ABBTRA0T3 a THE TITLE AID BB7IRREIRS APPEMDM: AMOIR' TIE P18,IC RECORDS OF ST. LIKE COURY, RORDA TIE LFOER9Qm ATTORIEY-AT~.Aw DIA.Y LICENSED TO PRACTI~ M M STATE OF ROROA $ OF TIE OPSAdi TINT APPAREM RECOIID TITLE TO THE LAID AS OEl~ AND S10SM ON TIE VYITlDI PUT q VE57ED M IE9E71VE IDES LTC, V. A FLd1OA L9AlED PARf1E1Wp, Y116G1INS AMARFM RECORD TITLE, S{l,ECT TO T/E FOLLOWIIO 110RT0AOE Ow1ERS. CERTFIED TXIS OAY OF , 1999. BY: AGENDA RE VEST '~/"' ITEM NO. DATE: May 25, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT):Human Services Division PRESENTED BY: Beth Ryder, Manager SUBJECT: Adopt Resolution No 99-110 to amend St. Lucie County Local Housing Assistance Plan for Fiscal Years 1998-1999, 1999-2000, 2000-2001, State Housing Initiative Partnership (SHIP) program to include a DISASTER MITIGATION/RECOVERY CONTINGENCY STRATEGY BACKGROUND: On April 27, 1999, the Board approved an amendment to the St. Lucie County Local Housing Assistance Plan to include a Disaster Mitigation/Recovery Contingency Strategy. According to Florida Statute 420.9072(3)(c) amendments to local housing assistance plans must be by resolution, therefore staff is requesting approval of Resolution 99-110 which formalizes the Disaster Mitigation/Recovery Contingency Strategy approved on April 27, 1999. FUNDS AVAIL. SHIP Grant PREVIOUS ACTION: Resolution No 98-101 was adopted on April 14, 1998 to approve the Local Housing Assistance Plan for Fiscal Years 1998-1999, 1999-2000, 2000-2001. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Resolution 99-110 amending the Local Housing Assistance Plan for fiscal years of 1998-1999, 1999-2000, 2000-2001 to include a Disaster Mitigation/Recovery Contingency Strategy. COM ISSION ACTION: [ APPROVED [ ]DENIED [ ]OTHER: County Attorney ~;~ CONCURf~ENCE: las M. Anderson my Administrator Coordination/Signatures Management & Budget Originating Department: Other: Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable Purchasing: Other: HUMAN SERVICES MEMORANDUM # 99-56 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Judy Mattera, Housing Coordinator ~~~Jd~ VIA: Beth Ryder, Human Services Manager ~~~~-' SUBJECT: Resolution No. 99-110 amending the St. Lucie County Local Housing Assistance Plan for Fiscal Years 1998-1999, 1999-2000, 2000-2001, State Housing Initiative Partnership (SHIP) program to include a DISASTER MITIGATIONIRECOVERY CONTINGENCY STRATEGY DATE: May 25, 1999 On April 27, 1999, the Board approved an amendment to the St. Lucie County Local Housing Assistance Plan to include a Disaster Mitigation/Recovery Contingency Strategy. According to Florida Statute 420.9072(3)(c) amendments to local housing assistance plans must be by resolution, therefore staff is requesting approval of Resolution 99-110 which formalizes the Disaster Mitigation/Recovery Contingency Strategy approved on April 27, 1999. STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Resolution 99-110 amending the Local Housing Assistance Plan for fiscal years of 1998-1999, 1999-2000, 2000-2001 to include a Disaster Mitigation/Recovery Contingency Strategy. 'Mrr-~ RESOLUTION NO. 99-110 .~~"'' A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, PROVIDING FOR THE ADOPTION OF THE AMENDED LOCAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE PLAN FOR ST LUCIE COUNTY, AS REQUIRED BY THE FLORIDA STATE HOUSING INITIATIVES PARTNERSHIP (SHIP) PROGRAM. WHEREAS, On June 15, 1993, this Board adopted Ordinance 93-017, establishing the Chapter 1-10-.5, Article IV, State Housing Initiatives Partnership of St. Lucie County (SHIP-SLC); WHEREAS, In accordance with the said Ordinance and the State Housing Initiatives Partnership Act, Section 420.907, Florida Statutes requirements for participation in the program stipulates this Board must approve, by resolution, any amendment to the Local Housing Assistance Plan which delineates affordable housing strategies, and identifies the average and maximum purchase prices for eligible property. WHEREAS, The County shall add a Disaster Mitigation/Recovery Contingency Strategy to the Local Housing Assistance Plan permitting assistance for very low, low and moderate income families in the event of a natural and/or man made disaster, and if SHIP funds are available. WHEREAS, The County may move funds between strategies as necessary to maintain compliance with State requirements and/or meet specific community needs. WHEREAS, In order to expedite the closing process for approval of SHIP closing cost and down payment assistance mortgages, the Board has determined it is appropriate to increase the SHIP program signing authority for the Human Services Manager for an amount up to and including Fifteen Thousand and no/100 Dollars ($15,000.) WHEREAS, In accordance with Section 420.9072, Florida Statutes, ten percent of the local housing distribution and five percent of the program income will be used to pay the administrative cost of the local housing assistance plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. The Local Housing Assistance Plan be amended to include a Disaster Mitigation/Recovery Contingency strategy. B. The average and maximum SHIP funds allowable for the Housing Assistance Plan strategy set forth in the Local Housing Assistance Plan are: HAP Strategy SHIP Average SHIP Maximum Award Program Cost Down Payment Assistance New Homes 12,500 187,500 Down Payment Assistance Existing Homes with No Rehab. 12,000 37,600 Down Payment Assistance Existing Homes with Rehab 12,000 52,500 Emergency Rehab 12,000 60,000 Disaster Mitigation/Recovery Contingency 12,000 60,000 C. The average total cost per housing unit benefitting from a SHIP Award is estimated at $70,000. Ord'' D. The maximum total cost for any housing unit benefitting from a SHIP Award shall not exceed ninety percent (90%) of the area median purchase price as established by the United States Department of Treasury. Chairman Paula A. Lewis XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX Commissioner John D. Bruhn XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 25th day of May, 1999. ATTEST: Deputy Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Chairman BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-7 DATE: May 25, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONSENT [XX] PRESENTED BY: Joseph D. Finnegan SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Personnel/Risk Management SUBJECT: Request for Approval of new St. Lucie County Safety Handbook BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County Staff has prepared a new Safety Handbook which contains information for all employees. This will be replacing the Safety Manual in the St. Lucie County Handbook. The Safety Handbook will be distributed to all employees. If approved by the Board of County Commissioners, each current employee will receive a copy of the Safety Handbook and each new employee will get a copy during his or her orientation period. FUNDS_AVAIL.: Not applicable P~tEVIOUS AC,~'ION : N/A RECOMMENDAT ON: It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners approve the new 5t. Lucie County Safety Handbook. C SION ACTION: CO CU [ APPROVED [ ] DENIED ' [ ~ OTHER: ~-- Do gl s M. Anderson Coun y Administrator C view n County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept Other• Finance: (Check r Copy onl , if applicable)_•,_ Eff. 5/96 ~--1 ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS /~~° \~~% at St. Lucie County SAFETY is ~AEETY Everybody's Business aOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS `~ COUNTY ADMI N I STRATO R DOUGLAS M. ANDERSON St. Lucie County Safety Handbook People are our most important asset -their safety is our greatest responsibility. This safety program, developed to assure compliance with Federal, State, and Local regulations, is our commitment to protect our employees against occupational injury or illness, and to prevent property damage and interruption of operations. This commitment extends to the protection of those we serve, the general public. Management and supervisory personnel will be accountable for the safety of the employees working under their supervision. Supervisors are expected to see that all operations are conducted in a safe manner at all times. As employees, you have the responsibility to yourself for your own safety, and also for your family, fellow employees, and the community. All employees are expected to follow safe procedures and take no unnecessary chances. You are required to use all safeguards and safety equipment provided, and make safety a part of your job. Good safety records reflect the quality of management, supervision and the work force. Our policy is to accomplish work in the safest possible manner consistent with good work practices. Management at every level is charged with the task of translating this policy into positive action. Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator JOHN D. 6RUHN, Disrricr No. 1 • DOUG COWARD, Disrricr No. 2 P Ad A nisrrarorS- Douglas M. Anderson NIE HUTCHINSON, District No. 4 CLIFF DARNES, Disrricr No. 5 County mi 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Phone (561) 462-1450 TDD (561) 462-1428 FAX (561) 462-2131 '`r~ TABLE OF CONTENT S PAGE SECTION Introduction .............................................................. . 3 ..... General Safety Program ............................................ .................. 4 New Employees/Work Procedures ................................. ...... ............ Procedures -Injuries ...................................... Reporting .................. 5 6 Emergency Procedures .................................................. ................... """" 7 ............... ........................................ Fire Prevention....... ..... "" 8 . -Fire Ext7nguisher Use .................................................... ................... 9 ..................................... Handling Chemicals ................. ... .. 1 ......................... Safety Shower -Eyewash Fountains..... .... ........ Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) ............................ ................. 11 Clothing -General .................................. ...................... ................... 13 Safety Meetings ............................................................ ................... 14 Lockout - Tagout/Safety Devices.......... ~' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " Confined Space/Hot Work Permits ............................... .................. 16 ............. Equipment Guardingf Hand Tools ..................... . 17 ... ........................ Electrical Equipment .:....................... ................... 1 .................................................. Ladders .................. .... .................... 19 ScaffoldingBarricades ................................................. .................... 20 Lifting ...................................................... 23 ................... Housekeeping .......................................... . .................... Smoking Regulations ................................. .................. Motor Vehicles .......................................... ................... 25 Outside Contractors ..................................................... ................... 26 Special Hazards ........................................................... .................... 27 Ergonomics .............................. ....... .................... 29 3 0 Workstations ............................................................... .................... 31 Office Safety Rules ...................................................... ................... General Safety Rules (Summary) ................................. ................... 33 Incident, Accident or Injury Reporting .. . ...................... .................... 3 5 Employee Receipt (Tear Off) ...................................... .................... 36 i INTRODUCTION Safety is a full-time occupation-at work, at home, wherever we may be. Here at St. Lucie County, your safety is a responsibility shared equally by management and its employees. The general County safety rules and regulations outlined in this booklet ar`e designed to keep you safe and to make St, Lucie County a safe place to work. In addition to the general County safety rules listed; each department has its own safety regula- tions which are specific to that department. These departmental rules do not supersede the general County rules, but are a supplement to them. Whenever there is any question where safety may be involved, check with your supervisor. An unanswered question could lead to an accident. Remember, use common sense, and obey all safety rules and regulations. 2 \./ `..r/ ST. LUCIE COUNTY GENERAL SAFETY PROGRAM As art of its responsibility for providing a safe p and healthful environment, St. Lucie County's management provides the following: 1) New employee safety training. 2) Continuing supervisory and employee safety training. 3) Personal Protective Equipment (PPE). 4) Formalized safety standards. 5) Periodic safety and housekeeping inspections. 6) Monthly deparhnental safety meetings. 7) Detailed accident investigations & corrective action. 8) A County Safety Committee. 9) Job Hazard Analysis. 10) Routine industrial hygiene monitoring. 11) Annual administrative audits. 12) Environmental protection and emergency response staffs. 3 NEW EMPLOYEES All newly-hired employees are provided a safety hand- bookbefore being assigned to work. The new employee is then given additional, more detailed Job Instruction Training with an emphasis on safety. During this train- ing period there are periodic checks by the supervisor to _make certain the employee not only understands the safety regulations, but that he is also putting them into practice . WO~r;~ P~OCE~~TRES Do not start a new assignment until you have been instructed in the safe procedures for that job. If in doubt about any part of your work, ask your supervisor about it. Report any unusual conditions to your supervisor imme- diately. 4 REPORTING INJURIES, ILLNESS, UNSAFE ACTS & CONDITIONS All injuries or illness, no matter how slight, incurred J while at work, must be reported to your supervisor immediately and, if necessary, treated at an `approved medical facility as soon as possible, but no later than the -end of the shift on which the injury occurred. On the off-shifts, weekends and holidays, the shift su- ervisor must be notified, and injuries may be treated at p the authorized medi-centers when available or at the hospital emergency room. (See page 3 5) Off-the job injuries must be reported to your supervisor when returning to work. Any unsafe acts/conditions that you may see must be reported to your supervisor immediately, so that correc- tive action can be taken to eliminate the act/condition. 5 EMERGENCY PROCEDURES All employees must be familiar with the procedures to be followed in the event of a County-wide general emergency. There are emergency shutdown procedures as part of every operating instruction. All operators must know the shutdown procedure for his or her operation and act _ upon them if necessary. Drills should be held for training and to test the effectiveness of emergency pro- cedures, per 29 CFR 1910.3 8, Employee Emergency Plans and Fire Prevention Plans.. AMBULATORY CARE When requesting an ambulance, do the following: 1) Notify your supervisor immediately and dial 911. 2) State what is needed, location, & your name. 3) If possible, stay on the phone until the dispatcher understands all information and post someone out- side the building to direct emergency personnel to the scene. 6 ~, °~/f FIRE PREVENTION The best defense against a fire is to prevent a fire from starting in the first place. Although many products stored in a warehouse or work area are not flammable, some packaging types commonly used today, such as cardboard, excelsior, foam compositions, and paper packing are definite fire hazards. In addition, some of the chemicals you work with maybe able to start or feed a fire. GENERAL CLASSES OF FIRES: Class A -Color Green: This type of fire is the most common. The combustible materials are wood, cloth, paper, rubber, and plastics. Class B -Color Red: Flammable liquids, gases, and greases create class B fires. Class C -Color Blue: Electrical fires -never use foam or water type extinguishers. Class D -Color Yellow: Fires arising from combustible metals, such as magnesium, titanium, zirconium, and sodium. These fires require specialized techniques to extinguish them. FIRE EXTINGUISHER USE When a fire starts, think first of your safety and the safety of others. Alert the fire department by calling 911. If you have been trained in fire extinguisher use, assess the extent of the blaze and act quickly to contain or extinguish the blaze using the right fire extinguisher. When using a typical fire extinguisher, follow the `PASS' method. Hold the extinguisher upright, and: . Pull the pin, stand back eight or ten feet, • Aim at the base of the fire, • Squeeze the handle, . Sweep at the base of the fire with the extinguishing agent. ~~ ^ If you aim high at the flames, you won't put out the fire. Also, remember that most fire extinguishers have a limited operation time, only 8 - 10 seconds; so you have to act fast and spray correctly at the base of the fire, not at the smoke or the flames. s HANDLING CHEMICALS Anyone handling any chemicals must be familiar with all of the safety hazards involved, per Florida's Right- To-Know and 29 CFR 1910.1200, Hazard Communica- tion. Material Safety Data Sheets (MSDS) which include safe handling procedures are available for all chemicals used at St.. Lucie County. They a`re located in your supervi- sors office and in the Public Safety Department. Do not use any chemical or substance that is not clearly identified and do not handle any chemical whose safety hazards have not been clearly explained. When handling chemicals, use personal protective equipment (PPE) where necessary. When pumping or transferring flammable liquids, all equipment being used must be statically grounded. All spills must be contained immediately. No material may be discharged into storm drains or onto the ground. Spill clean-up must follow approved procedures. See your supervisor for detailed procedures. 9 SAFETY SHOWERS c~ EYEWASH STATIONS Know the location of the nearest safety shower and eyewash station in your working area. Safety showers and eyewash stations are identified by posted signs at each location. Safety showers and eyewash. stations must be tested at least weekly. Report any defective safety shower or eyewash station to your supervisor. Keep the area around safety showers and eyewash sta- tions clear at all times for easy access. In the event of an eye injury, flush the eye with water until the foreign object has been rinsed out. Do not rub your eye, this can scratch the eye or embed the object. For chemical splashes, move quickly to the eyewash station, look directly into the stream of water and hold your eye open with your fingers. Flush your eye for at least 15 minutes and then get first aid. _.~ii,.. 1 10 r../i PERSONAL PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT (PPE) St. Lucie County supplies all required personal protec- tive equipment. Safety glasses and or face shields must be worn when _ grinding, cutting, hammering or whenever specified in operating instructions, or as directed by supervision. Chemical goggles must be worn when handling corro- sive liquids, whenever specified as part of any operating instruction, or as directed by supervision. Protective clothing (uniforms) are supplied by operating departments where required. This clothing must be worn in such departments. Special protective equipment (respirators, gloves, rub- ber boots, etc.) must be worn whenever specified in the operating instructions, or as directed by supervision. All personnel who may require respiratory protection for normal use, must have an initial fit test arranged by Risk Management, to insure that the .mask provides a suitable seal. 11 Facial hair must not interfere with the sealing edge of the respirator. Employees may be re-tested for fit under order of a supervisor if a facial change, including facial hair, indicates a potential for a poor seal on the mask. Hearing protection must be worn when using any indus- trial powered equipment or whenever posted. Individu- _ als exposed to 85 decibels or more, over an 8 hour period, will be included in the County's Hearing Con- ` servation Program per 29 CFR 1910.95, Occupational Noise Exposure. Each employee is responsible for the maintenance and care of all personal protective equipment assigned to him or her. All employees who regularly work in foot hazard areas, must wear approved safety shoes or other approved protective footwear. 12 '~n~ CLOTHING -GENERAL Loose fitting clothing poses a safety hazard when worn near rotating equipment. Frayed clothing may also create a hazard due to ease of ignition when worn near welding operations. Close-fitting clothing in good re- air must be worn in all work areas. Clothing is p rovided to employees in production, maintenance and _p various other departments. These items are to be worn while working and are not to be altered. Long sleeve clothing which is specified and issued by departments are to be worn for the skin protection of the individual employee. Finger rings and ornamental jewelry should not be worn around machinery/equipment and maintenance shops. The use of compressed air to clean clothing while being worn oses a serious risk of injury to face and eyes and p is not permitted. 13 SAFETY MEETINGS Operating Department Safety Meetings should be held on a scheduled basis. You are required to attend these meetings and are urged to participate to help you and your fellow workers obtain the safety benefits that these meetings provide. These meetings are designed to: 1) Promote SAFETY. 2) Motivate employee SAFETY awareness. 3) Communicate SAFETY information. 4) Develop positive SAFETY attitudes. 5) Teach SAFETY. 2~0004t7 4[°~]G7~G~CG ~ 14 "~.,/' LGCI~GUT - TAGtJUT All power driven equipment (electric, steam, internal combustion, air, etc.) and valves in pipelines containing hazardous materials (corrosives, steam, etc.) must be tagged and locked out before any work is done on them. Details for this procedure are contained in the County Safety Manual. ~~ ~~~ .. - ~s ors SAFLT'Y ~LViCES Safety devices are installed on equipment for your protection. No unauthorized person is permitted to remove, bypass or deactivate any safety equipment. No one may operate any equipment with safety tags attached. Tags and locks on electrical switch boxes and/or valves must not be removed except by authorized personnel. 15 CONFINED SPACE -HOT WOl~;I~ PET~;MIT SYSTEM Procedures for Confined Space Entry apply to entry into any tank, pit, manhole or any other confined space per 29 CFR 1910.146, Permit-Required Confined Spaces. _ No one is to enter any of the above designated areas until adequate steps have been taken to safeguard the employees involved and a confined space work permit has been issued. No employee may start a Hot Work job without a properly authorized hot work permit and that proper safeguards have been taken to protect the surrounding areas. These permits are issued by supervisory personnel at the work site, to insure that safe working conditions exist when work is done on any equipment. The details of these procedures are contained in the County Safety Manual. 16 ``~r+" `~n/ EQUIPMENT GUARDING Proper guards must be installed on all rotating or mov- ing equipment. Guards must never be removed while the equipment is running. Moving equipment must be shut down and locked out & tagged before guards are removed to do any repair work. (See section on Lockout - Tagout.) The guards must then be replaced before starting the equipment. ~ANI~ ToolJs Use the right tool for the right job and use it correctly. Keep tools clean, in good condition and properly stored. Do not carry tools -especially sharp or pointed ones - in your pocket. Use a tool box or tool belt. Any worn or defective tools must be .turned in to your supervisor for a replacement. 17 ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT Electricity is such an integral part of our lives at home and in the workplace, that we tend to take its power for granted. The primary hazards of electricity and its use are shock, burns, arc-blast, explosions and fires. OSHA's subpart S, 29 CFR 1910.301-.399 are the rules governing electrical work. Only authorized personnel may adjust or repair electri- cal equipment. Do not use any electric power tools unless they are properly grounded. Be sure extension cords are in good condition before using. Always remember the fatal combination that water and electricity make. Keep dry from head to foot when using any electrical equipment. When a fuse blows or a relay kicks out, it means an overload or a short. Notify your supervisor. O 18 rr~-'' LADDERS Don't build makeshift ladders out of chairs, benches, or boxes.. If the job calls for a ladder, take the time to find one . Make sure there's only one person on a ladder at a time. _ Don't stand on top of a step ladder. Also be careful not to get too close to the top of an extension ladder. Check the ladder's condition before climbing. Don't use a ladder with broken or cracked rails or rungs or with rungs made slippery by grease or oil. The ladder should have safety feet. Don't place a ladder on boxes or blocks to make it taller. Inspect all ladders for defects before you begin climb- ing. Don't overreach from a ladder. Set ladders up properly by using the 4 to 1 rule. The distance from the wall to the base of the ladder should be one fourth the distance from the base of the ladder to where it touches the wall. 19 SCAFFOLDING All scaffolds must be erected by qualified maintenance personnel and inspected by a qualified maintenance supervisor before being used. The supervisor will docu- ment the inspection results. _ BAIZRICADLS Anyone who makes a hole or opening where someone may fall in, is responsible for having it barricaded. Barricades may be of wood, rope, chain or similar material. Blinking lights must be attached to barricades on road- ways after dark. Barricades must conform to Florida, Department of Transportation guidelines for traffic con- trols. Barricades must also be erected around areas where employees are working overhead, or where there is danger of material being dropped or dislodged onto someone below. Zo ~.I~ LIFTING You can make lifting and carrying easy on yourself - or you can get into real trouble. It all depends on how you do it. Before you start, inspect what you're going to lift. Look for nails, splinters, rough strapping or other things that might injure you. Tip the load to test whether it is light enough for aone-man lift. 21 When you're ready to lift, here's how to do it: • Place one foot alongside the object, and one foot behind it, in a staggered position. • Keep your back straight. Not vertical -just straight. • Tuck your chin in. That helps you keep your back straight. • Grip the object with the palm of your hands, not - just your fingers. • Keep your arms and elbows close to your body. • Draw the object close to you. Your body weight should be centered over your feet. • Lift straight up by straightening your legs. Watch out for awkward positions. Shift your body until you can make a straight lift by pushing up with the more powerful leg muscles, not by putting a strain on your back. When turning, move your feet, DO NOT TWIST or turn at your waist. Get help to handle a large or heavy object. When two or more carry a load, decide beforehand how to handle it. Check the route and clearances ahead of time. Have one person act as the leader, so he can watch and coach the others. If it's a long object, each person should carry it on the same side of their body -and everybody should walk in step. 22 ~/ ~"'~ HOUSEKEEPING Good housekeeping and safety are inseparable. It is your responsibility to keep your work area and the equipment you use in a clean, neat, and orderly condition at all times. A few examples of good housekeeping are: 1) Clean up spills immediately. If the spill is hazardous report it to your supervisor & follow the spill procedures in the County Safety Manual. 2) Keep stairs and walkways clear and free of tripping hazards, such as hoses. 3) Keep exits, fire extinguishers, safety showers, eye wash stations and electrical switches free of any obstructions. 4) In the office, keep telephone cords and electrical cords out of the pedestrian walkways. 23 5) When maintenance work is completed, mechanics must clean up all nuts, bolts, fittings, etc., that are connected with the repair work. 6) Throw all trash and scrap in the proper waste container. This means oily rags in covered metal cans and chemicals in approved metal drums. - 7) Stack and store drums in straight, neat rows. 8) Pick up and sweep up where needed. SMOKING REG~TLATIONS Obey "NO SMOKING" regulations. Smoking is not permitted inside any County owned facility. Smoking is allowed only in smoking-approved areas. Discard all cigarette butts or matches in approved con- tainers -never in waste paper baskets or trash cans. 24 ''wrl~` COUNTY VEHICLES Only trained, qualified and properly licensed personnel are to operate any County vehicle. All safety regulations specific to each vehicle must be strictly followed. Seat belts shall be worn by the driver and passengers of all County vehicles. When traveling on County business, all employees shall wear seat belts at all times. AlI fork-lift operators are required to have classroom & hands on training, and be qualified before operating a fork-lift. Seat belts shall be worn while operating afork-lift, if equipped. A pre-trip inspection must be performed on all vehicles, per department guidelines. OUTSIDE CONTRACTORS Outside contractors working within a facility or in St. Lucie County are responsible for knowing and strictly adhering to the County's safety procedures. The County representative who is responsible for the _ contractor's job, must coordinate all activities between the contractor and County employees in the area where the contractor is working. ` The County representative must ensure that the contractor and sub-contractors are informed of all county safety procedures and specifically the County's Emergency Action Plan. No one is to lend any County equipment or tools to any contractor. ~- c3 ; , , ~~,, YCct-~ ~ ,~ 26 'r.r~" SPECIAL HAZARDS COMPRESSED GAS CYLINDERS Handle all compressed gas cylinders as if they are full. Keep the cylinders on end and strap or chain them securely. Use a cylinder truck to move them. Keep the protective cap over the valve & screwed in place when the cylinder is not in use. Always store gas cylinders where there is little variation in temperature. Never let oil -not even on your hands -get near oxygen cylinder controls. The combination can cause an explo- sion and fire. CHEMICAL AGENTS Air contaminants -Harmful air contaminants often come from grinding, welding or brazing, paint spraying or dipping, degreasing and other such operations. Always use hoods, exhaust systems or special enclo- sures to cut down on contaminants. 27 PHYSICAL HAZARDS N~elding sparks and light gays -Don't look at arc welding or gas welding operations unless you're wear- ing the recommended eye protection. Noise -Wear the recommended ear protection if you must go into high-noise areas. Ear muffs or earplugs are provided. Special training is provided for employees assigned to high noise are~.s. High-noise areas are posted. Zs `~/ `~ ERGONOMICS Ergonomics is a discipline that involves arranging the environment to fit the person in it. Following er- gonomic principles helps reduce stress and eliminate many potential injuries and disorders associated with overuse of muscles, bad posture, and repeated physical _ tasks. The objective of ergonomics is to reduce worker stress and injury through design of tasks, workstations, con- trols, displays, safety devices, tools, lighting, and equip- ment. Commitment and involvement of management and em- ployees are complimentary and essential elements of a sound safety and health program. Employees' with their intimate knowledge of their jobs can identify hazards, in order for management to imple- ment an effective way to abate such hazards. ~: .. s~. :,, , ,, ,, .; 29 WORKSTATIONS If you spend long hours at your workstation, typing and using the mouse, you are using highly repetitive motions. In order to avoid computer related aches and pains and _ make your work area as comfortable as possible; it's important to evaluate how you work and your work area. Follow these basic steps to avoid repetitive strains: . Place the monitor and keyboard directly in front of your body. . Sit comfortably erect with support behind the small of your back. . While using the keyboard, keep your forearms and hands parallel to the floor. Don't bend your wrists. . Position the screen so your eyes are at the same height as the top of the screen. . Keep both feet flat on the floor, with your thighs par- allel to the floor. . Don't do the same task for an extended period of time. Vary your tasks and activities. . Remove the clutter from underneath your desk. 30 iry `~ OFFICE SAFETY RULES Running in offices is prohibited. When walking in walkways, keep to the right -this will prevent collisions at blind corners. Stand away from the path or swing of doorways. When carrying a stack of light material, be sure vision is not blocked. Both arms should not be loaded when using stairs. Hold hand rail when using stairs. Do not litter floors, use trash cans. Scooting across the floor while sitting in a chair can cause an injury. Do not stand on a chair to reach an overhead object. Leaning back in a chair with your feet on the desk is dangerous. Office machines must not be placed near the edges of tables or desks. Telephone, office machine, or electrical cords, must not protrude into pedestrian walk areas. Paper cutters must be in the closed position when not in use. R~~G~ ~~ -~ a, ~ ,- ~ 6 a .~ J File drawers should not open into an aisle unless extra space is provided. Only one file drawer at a time should be opened. It should be closed immediately after use. Warnings should be given to persons in the immediate area when a file drawer is opened; so they do not turn around quickly or straighten up quickly and bump an open drawer. - . Climbing on open file drawers is forbidden. Small file stools must be-kept out of passageways when not in use. File cabinets should be moved only by designated individuals using proper equipment. Heavy objects should not be stacked on file cabi nets or window ledges. Good office housekeeping is a must to avoid accident and fire potential. In approved smoking areas, use ash trays for cigarette butts and matches. DO NOT throw them into trash cans. Know the location of fire extinguishers and how to use them. 32 ~,, `~ GENERAL SAFETY RULES This listing is a summary and is not inclusive. It is each employee's responsibility to be aware and follow all County rules and regulations. 1. Constantly observe work conditions, equipment, and tools for the purpose of preventing accidents. 2. Comply with all job safety instructions. Request help when unsure how to perform a task safely. 3. Use all safety equipment thatis required on the job. 4. Correct unsafe acts or conditions within the scope of your immediate work. Report any unsafe acts to your supervisor. 5. Advise supervisor of any faulty tools or equipment. 6. Stop work if conditions are such that there is immediate danger to life, limb or property. 7. The safe way to do a j ob must always be found before Ding ahead. Contact your supervisor when in doubt. g 8. Practice good housekeeping in your.' work area. Pick up your tools. Do not leave materials and scrap where they will be hazardous to others. 9. For your protection, obey all warning signs. 10. Report any unsafe conditions to your immediate supervisor. 33 11. Fighting or horseplay will not be tolerated and will be enforced in accordance with the Employee Handbook. 12. Whenever you are involved with any accident that results in personal injury or damage to property, no matter haw small, the accident must be reported to the immediate supervisor. Get first aid promptly. 13. Reporting to work under the influence of intoxicants, tranquilizers, narcotics, or other dangerous drugs, or possession of such, not prescribed by a doctor is prohibited. Report all medications prescribed by your doctor that may affect your work performance to your supervisor, in accordance with the Employee Handbook. 14. All prescribed safety and personal protective equipment should be used when required, and maintained in good working order. 15. When lifting, use the proper lifting technique. 16. Defective machines, tools, etc. will be reported and taken out of service at once. 17. Know the location, type, and how to use all fire extinguishers in your work area. Know the location of the nearest exit. 18. No employee shall remove, displace, damage, destroy, or alter any safety devices or safeguards provided, nor shall anyone interfere in any way with use thereof. 19. Do not operate machines, tools, equipment, or County vehicles without authorization. 34 ~,+' Incident, Accident or Injury Reporting When reporting an accident, the following procedures apply: • Report the accident to your supervisor. • Supervisor must report the accident to the Personnel/Risk Management Department In every report, the following forms must be used: • Initial notification farm (IWC-1) • Supervisor's Investigation (SAF-1) _ Drug Test Form (if applicable, not for non-employee) • Observation Report (not for non-employee) • PLEASE SEND ONLY 1 COPY TO THE PERSONNEL/RISK MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT. auto and Truck Accident The following forms are used in this type of accident: • Safety Reporting packet located in the glove box of every county vehicle. • Accident report, Auto and Truck form (brown, SAF-3) Non EmplovPp Accident The following forms are used in this type of accident. • GeneraUProducts Liability form (blue, SAF- 5) Vanda ' m, Burglaries. Theft The following forms are used in this type of accident: • Loss Report (red, SAF- 4) • Call the Ft. Pierce Police Department, Sheriff s Office, or Port St. Lucie Police Department (depends where the accident occurred). Have them write up a report with a case number. General Accidents (~m.~lov ~. Personal~niurv The following forms are used in this type of accident: • First Report of Injury (DWC-1) 35 EMPLOYEE'S RECEIPT I acknowledge receipt of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners General Safety Handbook, which covers general safety topics within the County. In addition, I agree to familiarize myself with the County's Safety Policy and the Safety Rules and Regu- lations that are specific to my department. Employee's Name (Print) Employee's Signature Date ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS County Supervisor's Signature Date NOTE: This receipt shall be read and signed by the employee. A responsible county supervisor shall countersign the receipt and place it in the employee's training file. 36 AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: Administration ITEM NO. Ci" DATE: May 25, 1999 REGULAR ( ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT (X ] PRESENTED BY: Douglas M. Anderson Funding for Avenue M extension into the Harbour Pointe property BACKGROUND: The Board of county commissioners directed staff to work with the City of Fort Pierce to provide for public access to the Harbour Pointe property. On April 26, 1999, Dennis Beach, Fort Pierce City Manager, provided the County with permission to proceed with the project to open access to Harbour Pointe. On May 5, 1999, the South Florida Water Management District provided the County with a "No Notice General Permit" to proceed. The total cost of this project is estimated at $50,000 with $30,000 to be funded from the General Fund and the balance to be funded with Recycling Grant funds. The project scope will include opening Avenue M, establishing a parking area, planting native trees in the buffer area at the waters edge, and placement of portalets, benches, and picnic tables. Materials will be recyclable in order to qualify for grant funding. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Will be made available in: 001-4110-599330-4606 by transfer of $30,000 from General Fund Contingency and 186202-4110-599330-4606 PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the funding of this project and approve Budget Amendment 99-117 authorizing the transference of $30,000 from General Fund Contingency into the project. COM SSION ACTION: [ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ~ Anderson Administrator Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: XX Management & Budget: ~ urchasing: Leisure Services: XX Public Works: XX Utilities: XX Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX G:\budget\agenda's\agenda99\5'25_HazbPt.wpd `~,,,~'JDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FOP~,,,,% REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: OMB PREPARED DATE: May 13, 1999 AGENDA DATE: May 25, 1999 H k - .~ ~1 .a ~, "4 ~F! iH t it _ _ ~. Y £ _ ~ I <V d~6~ i. ~~' ~. ,. f r ~ ~l~t~v i ~ •r ~1 U ~ ; ` 4~~~ _ ~ ~ "~.!St~ ~ ~ ~~t ~y. f r .r ~3 ~ ilk 1 rty 7 ea 7Y~,'`S v ' ~i y» u ' j~1 TO: 001-4110-599330-4606 Project Reserves (Harbor Pointe Ent) $30,000 FROM: 001-9910-599100-800 Contingency $30,000 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: Create public access to the Harbor Pointe property from Avenue M. CONTINGENCY BALANCE: THIS AMENDMENT: REMAINING BALANCE: $677,068 30 000 $647,068 DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: DOCUMENT # 8 INPUT BY: 99-117 OMB:QP/GENERAUFORMS/AMENDMEN eff.10/01/94 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET MEMORANDUM TO: Douglas M. Anderson, County Administrator FROM: Gary Perdew, Senior Budget Analyst X 172 SUBJECT: Proposed Budget For Harbour Pointe Entrance DATE: May 19,1999 To comply with your request for a proposed budget for the Harbour Pointe Entrance project, I contacted Jack Doughney and Ray Wazny. Specific details regarding the number and types of foliage, benches, tables etc. have not been worked out, however we did reach a consensus as to the general use of the funds. The proposed budget follows: Recycling Grant Funds 186202-4110-563000-4606 Imp O/T Bldgs (road & parking area) $5,000 Imp O/T Bldgs (benches, tables ...) 1 000 $20,000 Funds Transferred From Contingency 001-7110-563000-4606 Imp O/T Bldgs (landscaping) $30,000 Project Total $50,000 In regards to your request for a drawing, Jack Doughney has a `poster' size drawing of the project. You may use this drawing for your presentation or if you wish, he is prepared to speak from it during the Board meeting. There is one area of concerning regarding this project. According to Don West, County Engineer, permits for the Avenue M portion have been received, however, the county does not have permits for the parking lot, drainage improvements, or landscaping. GMP:gmp G:\budget\Gary\wpdocs\.wpd ~ A = .NDA FnLTEST~ ITEM NO. ~ ~ ~~ DATE: May 25, 1999 CONSENT [ X ] REGULAR[ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ ]Quasi-JD. [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: .o munity Development ~`' ommunity Development Dir. Si TRJF.CT: Request for authorization to submit a Florida Communities Trust Grant Application for the purchase of lands within the Ancient Oaks Preserve project. BA K TRO 1ND: The St. Lucie County Land Acquisition Selection Committee has chosen 51 acres for acquisition through the Environmentally Significant Lands Acquisition Program. The Land Acquisition Selection Committee has requested that staff seek matching funds through the Florida Communities Trust Program. The application requests a matching grant of 50% towards the estimated project costs of $830,000. FilNi~4 AVATT. R ..: The matching funds of approximately $334,000 will be made available through the County's Environmental Significant Land Purchase Bond issue and $143,000 from the Recreation Impact Fee fund. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RF..OMMENDATION: Authorize staff to submit the Florida Communities Trust application for the Ancient Oaks Preserve project on behalf of the County Commission. NIISSION AcTI4SL•. [ APPROVED [ ]DENIED []OTHER: 4-1, verify boundaries with property owner. County naomay: u M. Anderson County Administrator 1'nrchasing: Originating Department: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Othcr: ~~~~ COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: May 25, 1999 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Co mi sinners From: mmunit~~D lopm irector Y Date: May 18, 1999 Subject: Request for authorization to submit a Florida Communities Trust Grant Application for the purchase lands within the Ancient Oaks Preserve Project. The County's Land Acquisition Selection Committee has recommended that an FCT application be submitted to purchase 51 acres that includes native upland habitat within the White City area. The proposed project is a cooperative effort of the Department of Community Development and the Leisure Services Department to provide needed public recreation facilities while preserving nature upland habitat and some of the largest trees in St. Lucie County. The Ancient Oaks Preserve is located on the east side of Oleander Avenue, approximately 1/4 mile of Midway Road (Exhibit A). The proposed FCT project contains three native communities including Hydric hammock (23 acres), Mesic flatwoods (16 acres), and Depression marsh (.25 acres). These areas include Mature Live oak, Laurel Oak, Cabbage palm and Slash pines. Hand Fern, an endangered species is found on over 20 Cabbage palms within the Hydric hammock areas. Approximately 11 acres of the site was cultivated in citrus and has since converted into exotic species primarily, Austrian pine, Brazilian pepper, and Guava. Recreational improvements, including restrooms, parking, and a recreational field will be provided within areas that have been highly degraded by exotic plant species. Improvements within the natural areas will be limited to nature trails with rest areas, and interpretive signage. Because the entire draft is lengthy, the summary is provided for your review (Exhibit B). The complete application is available in the Community Development Department. Please note that the project costs estimates are preliminary (based upon the owners asking price) and the actual purchase price will be based upon the final appraised value. The application requests that FCT cover 50%, of the estimated $830,000 project costs. Approximately, 35%, or $334,000, will be provided from the County's Environmentally Significant Land fund and the remaining 15%, or $143,000, will be provided from the Recreation Impact Fee fund. May 18, 1999 Page 2 `w/ Petition: FCT Application Ancient Oaks Preserve Staff recommends the Board authorize staff to submit the Ancient Oaks Preserve Florida Communities Trust grant application on the behalf of the County Commission. cc: County Administrator Press/Public ~..- z fn ° ~ „E ~ ~~ s CCS - O ~ T m a~ g O . . ~ O vi ~ //~~,~ U ~ $ a ~ ~~ t 4 W Q y y ` f U ~ . N «~ ~~~A ~ y n o ~I. tUW- U O. ]I '~ L ~ e ~ W 00 t ~ O ~~ ~ d t K Ttf yrs" ~ - e ~ ~ t~ {~jaV ~l ~ E4 Q ~ ~ i yar~ f a ~ ~ ,~ 0 s ~yi}y~ / ~ •, ~ G i~ W • p p t~W ~ 6 • f s ° ' /..~-''~ ~ ~ / 9 ~ ~~ is ~ ~ -Rs r P Ow pL_ ~ ~i p ~ Q W .u ~ C P O araY INK Q Drat 7r 3arrr U Y Qrar lrrr~ 1f3ar)1 1r30 W oW : `yy ~ Q A ~ 7 ~~ N011YM~ C S aver ants ~ G a Ko ~ Z W W ~~yyj I. 7 Pam A A ff C C 4~ S Yfi 1 T Si 1 S 9C 1 ALNflO~ .3380H~33~10 e ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY `~ Ancient Oaks Preserve PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT PURPOSES AND OBJECTIVES [Rule 9K-4.0031(10)&(12) and Rule 9K 4.004(5)(a)3., F.A.C.] Statement of purpose and objectives, including a discussion of reasons in support of project site acquisition, future uses, improvements, facilities, and activities intended on the site. PLrpose and Objectives Ancient Oaks Preserve encompasses nearly 51 acres containing mature oaks, cabbage palms and slash pines, many over 100 years old. Public acquisition is proposed to ensure the protection of the largest upland tract with ancient oak and pines trees within the urbanized area of White City. Ancient Oaks Preserve is a joint outdoor recreation and natural area preservation project that will provide natural area open space and outdoor recreation opportunities in the White City area; and * implement portions of the Conservation and Recreation and Open Space Elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; and * protect, restore, and maintain natural ecosystems for passive recreation uses; and * preserve and maintain a recreational hub within the County's greenway network; and * remove invasive exotic plant species as part of the land management and habitat restoration initiatives; and * provide passive recreation opportunities for hiking, nature study and awareness of the beauty and diversity of ecosystems for man and nature; and * provide for the appropriate use and conservation of natural resources within St. Lucie County, in a manner which maximizes their functions and values. The 51-acre project is located within the geographical center of the urbanized area of St. Lucie County, the fastest growing County in the Treasure Coast region. A cooperative effort between the St. Lucie County Leisure Services Department and the County's Environmentally Significant Lands program, the project provides for needed public recreation facilities while preserving valuable natural resources. Public acquisition will ensure preservation of some of the oldest oak and pine trees in St. Lucie County for the enjoyment of residents and visitors. (Ancient Oaks Preserve) will also provide passive and recreational opportunities required to meet the population demands in this growing area of central St. Lucie County. Ancient Oaks Preserve will be integrated into the County's greenway network as a recreational hub. The (Preserve) will enhance the County's greenway network byproviding amulti-use recreational link in close proximity to the North Fork of the St. Lucie River corridor. The NFSLR is located one mile to the west and the South Savannas Reserve and Recreation Area is located approximately 1.5 mile to the east (Appendix J). The (preserves) location between these two large ecological corridors will assist in providing a recreational link connected by existing and proposed pedestrian and cycling facilities in the area (Appendix R). This will further County's efforts to provide a connected system of preservation, conservation, and recreation lands between the South Savannas Reserve and FCT/P2000-4 (eff 2-10-98) 1 Recreation Area and the North Fo~of the St. Lucie River. `""~ The intent of the project is to provide active and passive outdoor recreational activities compatible with the preservation of the sites forested communities. Nature trails with rest areas and interpretive signs describing the habitat and historic trees are the only improvements proposed within the natural azeas of the site. Pazking, restrooms and more active recreational uses will be located within the areas containing exotic plant species. For partnership applications, the statement should address the purposes and objectives of the joint project and the division of responsibilities among the partners (including fiscal and management commitments) and include interlocal agreements, if any, relative to the proposed joint project. Not Applicable. For applicant requesting a loan, the statement should also address the need for a loan. Not Applicable. - - COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION [Rule 9K-4.0031(12) and Rule 9K-4.004(5)(b)5., F.A.C.] Statement, with cross-references to specific comprehensive plan, goals, objectives and policies and the appropriate provisions in the support documents, describing how the project will assist the local government in implementing the recreation and open space, conservation, or coastal management elements of the comprehensive plan. Through the acquisition and protection of the Ancient Oaks Preserve, the following goals, objectives, and policies in County's Comprehensive Plan are furthered: The Conservation Element establishes the goal to protect, appropriately use, or conserve the natural resources in a manner which maximizes their function and values (Goal 8.1). Through the acquisition, preservation and development design of this project site, this will be complied with. Objective 8.1.6, Policy 8.1.6.2, and Policy 8.1.8.8 ("protect and conserve the natural functions of soils" by prohibiting "the use of off-road vehicles in azeas identified as environmentally sensitive) aze complied with through the restriction of unauthorized access into the project boundaries. Policy 8.1.8.1 promotes land development regulations which require the removal of all exotic vegetation from sites and replacement with native vegetation. The acquisition of this project site into public ownership will further the increase of natural preserve lands (Objective 8.1.8) through the process established in Policy 8.1.8.11("establish a County Land Acquisition Selection Committee whose function shall be to ... formulate a master acquisition list of lands having native habitats"). Also complied with are Objective 8.1.12 and Policy 8.1.12.1("identify for conservation and protection" "environmentally sensitive upland ... azeas"). Policy 8.1.8.2 state(s) that the land development regulations to be adopted by August 1, 1990, shall include criteria for the protection of all endangered and threatened plant and animal species as well as the conservation of the supporting native habitat. Policy 8.1.8.7 states that St. Lucie County shall include within its Land Development Regulations criteria and standazds to ensure maximum protection of the remaining native FCT/P2000-4 (eff 2-10-98) plant communities within the Coin: St. Lucie County Resource Protectiond Development Code Sec. 6.00.00 implements these policies. With the acquisition of the Ancient Oaks Preserve, in setting aside open natural land in an established urban area for passive recreation, fulfills Goal 9.1 and Objective 9.1.1 in the Recreation and Open Space Element ("provide active and passive recreation facilities and open space areas which offer a broad range of activities to all citizens of St. Lucie County.") Policy 9.1.1.1 and Policy 9.1.1.2 establishes the levels of service standards for Recreation and Open Space and the guideline that these levels of service shall be "achieved ... through an equitable and systematic land acquisition and development program. This project site also complies with Policy 9.1.1.5 (identify ecological communities and designate those areas for open space and natural preservation, protection, conservation, and appropriate use ...."). Acquiring the site to expand the existing recreational facilities to include passive activities complies with Policy 9.1.1.3 ("The County will continue to correct and improve upon existing deficiencies through additional land acquisition and development...expansion or renovation of existing parks and recreational facilities") For partnership applications this statement should be based on the local comprehensive plan of the jurisdiction(s) within which the joint project is located, as well as relevant goals, objectives and policies of the local comprehensive plan of the application partner(s). If the project site is not wholly contained within one jurisdiction, then appropriate sections of the comprehensive plans of the various local governments wherein the project site lies are required to be cited. Not Applicable. FCT/P2000-4 (eff 2-10-98) 3 CONCEPTUAL MANAGEME~`1` PLAN AND SOURCE OF FUNDI FOR MANAGEMENT [Rule 9K-4.004(5)(d), F.A.C.] Lands acquired using Preservation 2000 funds shall be managed to make them available for public recreational use, provided that the recreational use does not interfere with the protection of natural resource values. Conceptually describe and identify the existing and proposed physical improvements; how access will be provided; who will be responsible for maintenance and security; staffing requirements; the primary components of site protection, enhancement and restoration; and expected sources of funding for the development and management of the site. There aze few existing physical improvements located at Ancient Oaks Preserve. Approximately 11 acres (21 %) of the site was cultivated in Citrus which has since converted into exotics namely, Australian pine, Brazilian pepper and Guava. An artesian well is located at the northwest corner of the property, which once irrigated this grove. To manage water levels, a series of ditches were constructed azound the grove. An AT&T easement runs through the site with buried telephone and cable (Exhibit G). Few physical improvements aze proposed for the majority of the site. Improvements within the natural areas will be limited to nature trails with rest azeas and interpretive signage. The perimeter of the site will be fenced, except along the southern property line where it abuts a deep canal. In the 11 acres of impacted azea, restrooms, parking, and a recreational field will be provided within azeas that have been highly degraded by exotic plant species. ) Access to Ancient Oaks Preserve will be from Oleander Avenue, a paved County roadway. Parking will be provided in close proximity to Oleander Avenue. The entrance will be gated. None aze proposed at this time. The responsibility of maintenance and security of the Ancient Oaks Preserve will be undertaken by St. Lucie County's Leisure Services Department. A fence will be constructed along much of the perimeter of the site, to ensure that dumping of trash or hazazdous waste and unauthorized vehicular access does not occur. The Leisure Services Department will monitor the azea in their day to day activities. Leisure Services personnel will contact the Sheriffs Department if they observe any vandalism, trespassing, and other property damage. There is no additional staffing recommended at this time. The Environmental Lands Section of Leisure Service, combined with the Pazks Division will manage the day to day activities of the preserve. Several preliminary vegetative and animal surveys have been conducted on the site. Gopher tortoise and Hand fern, FCT/P2000-4 (eff 2-10-98) 4 which has been observed onsite, wi~e protected through the preservation arrianagement of the existing habitats. The removal of exotic plant species, preservation of natural azeas, and elimination of unauthorized access will be the primary means utilized in the management of native habitats. Vegetative Communities - The Ancient Oaks Preserve supports three native vegetative communities: Hydric hammock 23 ac, Mesic flatwoods 16 ac and Depression marsh 0.25 ac. The exotic Australian Pine and Brazilian pepper, and TLava aze primarily contained to a 6.2 acre azea in the northwest corner of the site, and a 4.88 acre pazcel along Oleander Avenue. Guava, Shoebutton Ardisia and Syngonium aze located scattered throughout the understory of the hammock azeas. Hydric hammock - The overstory of the 23 acre pazcel contains Mature Live Oak, Laurel Oak and Cabbage Palm with a few scattered Slash Pine. Hand Fern, an endangered species is found throughout the area on 20+ Cabbage Palms. The fern is epiphytic on very old Cabbage Palms, and requires specific environmental conditions to survive. Ancient Oaks contains one of the highest concentrations of the fern known in the county. Understory plants consist of Swamp fern and Wild coffee. Shoebutton Ardisia (Ardisia elliptica), Coral Ardisia (Ardisia crenata), Guava (Psidium spp) and Arrowhead vine (Syngonium podophyllum) are exotics that are found scattered throughout portions of the community as understory species. Mesic Flatwoods -The overstory of the 16 acre pazcel contains Slash pine, Laurel Oak and Live Oak. Saw palmetto, Wax myrtle and Gallberry dominate portions of the understory. Guava is found scattered in the community. Due to lack of fire in several azeas, this community is transitioning to Hydric hammock. Approximately 6 acres of the Flatwoods have retained their natural chazacteristics. Depression Marsh -Depression marsh is characterized as a shallow, usually rounded depression in sand substrate with herbaceous vegetation often in concentric bands. Vegetation present includes swamp fern, St. Johns wort, red root and pickerelweed. The 0.25 acres of mazsh is in mazginal condition with encroachment of hardwoods and gradual filling of organics. Wildlife Resources Several inventories have been conducted on the project site by the St. Lucie County Environmental Lands Specialist. The following listed wildlife specie has been observed onsite: Gopher Tortoise (Gopherus polyphemus) -The gopher tortoise is classified as a species of special concern by the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission (GFC). Gopher tortoises occupy a wide range of upland habitat types that have the presence ofwell-drained, sandy soils, and an abundance of herbaceous ground cover, generally with an open canopy cover to allow sunlight to reach the ground. (Cox, Inkley, Kautz, 1987) (Appendix C) An ample amount of sunlight reaching the ground is also necessary for incubation of gopher tortoise eggs which aze laid in the mound of soil at the burrow opening. Gopher tortoise burrows may provide refuge for as many as sixty (60) vertebrate and three hundred-two (302) invertebrate species. Many endangered and threatened species, such as the Florida mouse (Peromyscus floridanus), Eastern indigo snake (Drymarchon corals couperi), Florida Pine Snake (Pituophis melanoleucus mugitus) and Gopher frog (Rana capito aesopus), aze believed to require gopher burrows for their existence. Based on field sightings, gopher tortoises and their habitat occur within the site. Approximately 10 active and several) inactive burrows were observed within the flatwood community and 4.88 acre exotic outpazcel. The conservation of this species maybe enhanced by the preservation of existing burrows, creation of perimeter fencing and trails. FCT/P2000-4 (eff 2-10-98) 5 Resource enhancement programs taddress the long term viability of the ord.' habitats and listed species aze part of the plan for Ancient Oaks Preserve. Resource management programs include fencing, exotic species removal, elimination of trash and restriction of access. Due to the urbanization of the surrounding azea and species composition of the mesic flatwoods, fire management of the community has not been considered. Though wild hogs have not been a problem on the site, to protect native plant communities, any that are encountered will be trapped and removed from the site. A monitoring plan utilizing photo plots and transects will be established to evaluate management objectives. Archaeological and Historic Resource Protection There are no known archaeological or historic resources onsite. Prior to any land disturbance activities, a systematic review will be conducted. If any resources are found on the site, the Division of Historic Resources will be contacted. 1. Costs Fencing (5,240 ft) Kiosk (2) Nature trails Bike rack Parking Restrooms Infrastructure Recreational improvements Exotic removal Benches (5) Signage Total $5,100. (installed) $1,000. N/A 250. 50,000. 50,000. 100,000. 100,000. 100,000. 100. $408,450. 2. Sources of Funding for the Development and Management Funding The local match for the acquisition of Ancient Oaks Preserve will be contributed by the County's ESL Bond Fund and Recreation Impact Fees. All recreational improvements will be funded through the general fund. FCT/P2000-4 (eff 2-10-98) 6 ~ A NDA RE~IIES1~ ITEM NO. C DATE: May 25, 1999 CONSENT [ X ] REGULAR[ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ ]Quasi-JD. [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BYE: Q ED BY: G~~ SUBMITT nmmilnl Community Development Dir. RT TBTF. ,T• Request for authorization to submit a Florida Communities Trust Grant Application for the purchase of lands within the North Fork of the St. Lucie River Greenway Addition. BACKCTROi1ND~ The St. Lucie County Land Acquisition Selection Committee has chosen 15.22 acres for acquisition through the Envirorunentally Significant Lands Acquisition Program. The Land Acquisition Selection Committee has requested that staff seek matching funds through the Florida Communities Trust Program. The application requests a matching grant of 80% towards the estimated project costs of $400,000. The remaining $80,000 will be made available from the Environmentally Significant Lands bond fund. FITNDS AVAT . B ..: The matching funds of approximately $80,000 are available through the County's Environmental Significant Land Purchase bond fund. PRFVIOUS ACTION:_ N/A gFrnNrn~rF.~ATION: Authorize staff to submit the Florida Communities Trust application for the North Fork of the St. Lucie River Greenway Addition on behalf of the County Commission. SION ACTION: ~~` [ APPROVED [ ]DENIED [ ]OTHER: u M. Anderson Co tv Administrator County Attorney: originating Department: Management & Budget: Purchasing: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) ~_~ COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: May 25, 1999 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Com~ners From: munity evelopment Director Date: May 18, 1999 Subject: Request for authorization to submit a Florida Communities Trust Grant Application for the purchase lands within the North Fork of the St. Lucie River Greenway Addition. The County's Land Acquisition Selection Committee has recommended that an FCT application be submitted to purchase 15.22 acres along the North Fork of the St. Lucie River (NFSLR) Greenway. The NFSLR Greenway Addition includes two parcels along the NFSLR corridor. The project includes a 7.22 acre parcel located on the south side of Bell Avenue approximately 1,000 feet east of South 25th Street, and an 8 acre parcel fronting on South 25th Street (Exhibit A). The proposed parcels were not included in the CARL/SOR NFSLR project because of their relatively small size. However, the proposed preservation of the project lands will further overall preservation and restoration efforts along the NFSLR corridor. The FCT project contains two native communities (Hydric hammock and Floodplain Swamp) along the NFSLR and are adjacent to proposed conservation lands and the Platt's Creek Wetland Mitigation Area. Acquisition of the project lands will expand recreational opportunities along the NFSLR. The FCT application includes provisions for limited recreation improvements. Proposed recreation facilities include a small unpaved parking area, nature trails, canoe dock and bike stands to accommodate cyclists. Other improvements will include fencing, exotic removal, and minimal improvements to existing trails. Because the entire draft is lengthy, the summary is provided for your review (Exhibit B). The complete application is available in the Community Development Department. Please note that the project costs estimates are preliminary, based upon the owners asking price, and the actual purchase price will be based upon the final appraised value. Staff recommends the Board authorize staff to submit the North Fork of the St. Lucie River Greenway Addition Florida Communities Trust grant application on the behalf of the County Commission. z n 0 c z z ~--.n+- ~F ~ o ~ lV ~ o u ~ 'o "'~ o e ~ j f ~' p a 3 (~ --t ~ `'/ FLORIDA COMMUNITIES TRUST PRESERVATION 2000 PROGRAM APPLICATION FORM FCT/P2000-4 (effective 2-10-98) PROJECT NAME North Fo ' ``'- ~+ r ^'° r~'~""' FCT Addition (descriptive site name) APPLICANT NAME _,~t Lucie Count~~ Rnarc~ of Counl~Commiccioner~ (Name of local government(s) requesting award) Address of local government applicant's principal offices PARTNERSHIP APPLICATIONS Is this a partnership application between two or more local governments as described in Rule 9K- 4.0031(12), F.A.C.? Yes ~_ No If yes, provide the name of the local government(s) and the address of the principal office of all local governments that are partnering with the above-named applicant in this application. APPLICATION PHASE KEY CONTACT PERSON Note: the Key Contact is required to be an employee of the local government; this individual will be receivinggrant-related correspondence and may be required to provide supplemental information; identify only one key contact person. Key contact name Diana Waite First Middle Last Title FnvirnnmF±ntal Planner TTT Elected Official? Yes No ~- Department Community Devel ~ g Division Mailing Address City Ft Pierce State FT . Zip Code 34982 Delivery Address Phone Number ~S~L)4fi?~? (56L~62- 822 259-1577 Primary Secondary (if applicable) Suncom (if applicable) FCT/P2000-4 (eff 2-10-98) 1 `r/ Fax Number (561)462 Primary Cellular Phone (if applicable) 4r~ Secondary (if applicable) Suncom (if applicable) E-mail Address n;a„a. ttn~ieco_gov (if applicable) ESTIMATED TOTAL ACREAGE 15 22 ACRES Indicate the exact acreage of the project site, if known. Otherwise, estimate the acreage to two significant digits (e.g., 3.1 acres, 35 acres, 120 acres). OWNERSHII' Number of separate parcels within project site 2 If the site is comprised of multiple parcels, see Rule 9K-4.010(2)(j), F.A. C. Number of different owners within project site 2 If only one owner, provide name, address, and phone number 1. Sunquest Inc., P.O. Box 1634, Vero Beach, FL 34961-1634, (561)562-3851 2. George and Barbara Jones, 2740 Collidge Rd, Fort Pierce, FL, (561) 464-8070 If the project site is comprised of more than one parcel or one owner, complete the attached Acquisition Plan to indicate the general priority and order of the acquisition of sites to insure that, in the event that all sites are not acquired, the purposes of the project will be achieved. Has the entire project site been pre-acquired by the applicant through avoluntarily-negotiated transaction within one year prior to the application deadline or will it be acquired within 180 days after the application deadline? Yes No ~_ If yes, the date of the closing of the acquisition(s) Has any portion of the project site been pre-acquired by the applicant through avoluntarily-negotiated transaction within one year prior to the application deadline or will any portion (s) be acquired within 180 days after the application deadline? Yes No __X_- Ifyes, the date of the closing of the acquisition(s) NOTE: The use of condemnation or the threat of condemnation is not considered avoluntarily- negotiated transaction. PROJECT SITE LOCATION County(s) Saint Lucie - Primary Section 33 Township 35~ _ Range 40E FCT/P2000-4 (eff2-10-98) 2 ~`"'~" PROJECT COSTS F,c im to the project costs as defined in Rule 9K-4.002(31), F.A.C. Enter an amount in every blank; if the amount is zero, enter $0.00. Cost to purchase land Other acquisition costs Cost of appraisal map(s)/certified survey(s) and review Cost of appraisals and review Cost of title report(s) /insurance Cost of environmental audit(s) Eligible fees or commissions, if any Other eligible project cost, if any Subtotal of the other acquisition costs ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COSTS ~ 400,000.00 Amount of award requested from FCT $x,000 Amount or value of local match $ 80,000 (as defined in 9K-4.0031(9), F.A.C.) ESTIMATED TOTAL PROJECT COSTS $ 400,000 (should be the same as shown above) Percent of award from FCT 80 (percent of estimated total project costs to be contributed by the Florida Communities Trust) Percent of local match 20 % (percent of estimated total project costs to be contributed by the local government) TOTAL PERCENTAGE _-1952--% FCT/P2000-4 (eff 2-10-98) 3 ~./ ~ Acquisition Plan Project Name• North F^~'• ^f +''° ct t "~~P RivPr [:reenway Applicant: St Luc' o ~nty Rule 9K-4.004(5)(g), Florida Administrative Code, reads in part as follows: If the project site consists of more than one parcel or owner, an Acquisition Plan, as defined in Rule 9K- 4.002(2), is required. Rule 9K-4.002(2), Florida Administrative Code, reads as follows: Acquisition Plan applies to Project Sites with multiple parcels or multiple owners and means a written description of the priority parcels and the general order in which the parcels will be acquired to assure that, in the event that all parcels cannot be acquired, the purposes of the project can be achieved. Florida Communities Trust (FCT) staff will review the acquisition plan to assure that the purposes of the project can be achieved in the event all parcels can not be acquired. _ _ Provide tax identification number for all parcels within the project boundary Parcell• ID #: 2432-221-0001-000/2 (7.22 acres) P r ID #: 2432-231-0002-00000 (8 acres) Provide the name, address and phone number, if available, for all the owners of parcels within the project boundary George & Barbara Jones 2740 Coolidge Rd. Fort Pierce, FL 34945-3133 PH:(561) 464-8070 P r SunQuest Inc. P.O. Box 1634 Vero Beach Fl, 32961-1634 PH: (561) 562-3851 Identify the priority parcels needed to achieve the purposes of the project. Both parcels are a priority and either parcel will contribute to the overall goals of the project. Identify the general order in which the parcels should be acquired, parcels can be grouped in categories. Both parcels are priority an the purchase of either parcel will assist in meeting the projects goals. There is no required order in which the parcel should be purchased. Parcel 1 (ID# 2433-221-0001-000/2), George & Barbara Jones Parcel 2 (ID# 2433-231-0002-000/0), SunQuest Inc. FCT/P2000-4 (eff 2-10-98) 4 ~./ SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION. Provide the following information to assist the Trust in determining future needs of the program. (Submission of this information is voluntary and will not affect the applicant's ranking.) 1. What county is the project site located? Ca;nr T,~~c;e 2. What is the name and address of the main newspaper that covers the area where the project site is located? Name n'* Aiarra Tri}~ lne Address 600 Edwards Road City ~t pierce State.-F~- Zip Code X4982 3. What is the Florida House of Representative district number that encompasses the project site? 4. What is the Florida Senate district number that encompasses the project site? 5. What is the Regional Council district that encompasses the project site? 6. What is the Water Management District that encompasses the project site? FCT/P2000-4 (eff 2-10-98) 5 North Fork of the St. Lucie River FCT Addition. ST. LUCIE COUNTY PROJECT INFORMATION PROJECT PURPOSES AND OBJECTIVES [Rule 9K-4.0031(10)&(12) and Rule 9K 4.004(5)(a)3., F.A.C.] `~/` Statement of purpose and objectives, including a discussion of reasons in support of project site acquisition, future uses, improvements, facilities, and activities intended on the site. The purpose of the NFSLR greenway project is to protect lands along an important ecological and recreational greenway through public purchase in a manner that provides protection of natural resources and provides additional recreational opportunities. The proposed North Fork of the St. Lucie River FCT project will increase public land ownership along the North Fork of the St. Lucie River (NFSLR) in a manner that enhanced the overall efforts to protect the remaining natural resources of the river and fill gaps in the North Fork greenway. The project also: • complements existing State, Regional and Local programs targeting the protection and enhancement of native habitats and water resources that remain along the North Fork of the St. Lucie River and its tributaries; and • expand public ownership to encompass parcels along NFSLR that were below the threshold included within the existing County, Save Our Rivers (SOR) and State Conservation and Recreational Lands (CARL) project; • implements portions of the Conservation and Recreation and Open Space Elements of the St. Lucie County comprehensive Plan; • protects, restore, and maintains natural ecosystems for preservation of habitat for listed species -and compatible recreational uses; and • protects floodplains that contribute to the storage of water and the protection of the NFSLR waters quality; and • protects and enhances lands identified within a Strategic Habitat Conservation Area; and • removes all invasive exotic plant species as part of the land management and habitat restoration initiatives; and • provides passive recreation opportunities for hiking, nature study, bird watching, picnic(k)ing and environmental education; and • protects, appropriately use, and conserve the natural resources of the NFSLR, in a manner which maximizes their functions and values. The North Fork of the St. Lucie River is a Black Stream waterbody beginningin unincorporated St. Lucie County and flowing to the south as it meanders through the City limits of Port St. Lucie. The headwaters of the North Fork are at the confluence of Five Mile Creek and Ten Mile Creek, just west of the subject parcels. After receiving dischazge from numerous canals and other outfalls and tributaries, the North Fork broadens and combines with the South Fork to empty into the St. Lucie Estuary Basin and the Indian River Lagoon. Approximately 1,500 acres along a 12 mile long corridor is in public ownership, with an addition 1,300 acres tazgeted for purchased through various programs, including the Conservation and Recreational Land (CARL), Save Our Rivers (SOR), Office of Greenway & Trails (OGT), and South Florida Ecosystem Restoration programs. The NFSLR was first proposed for acquisition by the Trust for Public lands through the CARL program. In 1994, the SOR and St. Lucie County's Environmentally Significant Lands program joined efforts to purchase lands along the NFSLR corridor. However, several smaller pazcels along the corridor were not identified for purchase under these acquisition programs. These pazcels are being proposed to be purchased through alternative programs, such as the Office of Greenways & Trails and Florida Communities Trust. The NFSLR FCT addition proposes the purchase of 15.22 acres and provides for management and uses that will assist in protecting the NFSLR waters, preserve the riverine floodplain, restore degraded lands, and provide a connected riverine greenway that provides public recreational opportunities compatible with the protection of the river's resources. With its relatively unspoiled condition and close proximity to population center, the proposed project has a high recreation and education value. The project lands will provide a recreation site along the NFSLR Greenway.. Hiking, picnicking and wildlife viewing will be provided. Facilities will include, parking azeas, picnic tables, bike stands, nature trails and interpretive signage, canoe dock. The trail head for the NFSLR paddling trail is White City Park, a County owned and managed facility located two miles south of the project lands. The subject pazcels will serve as an additional recreation site along the NFSLR corridor. Invasive exotic plants will be removed and fencing will be erected to regulate unauthorized access.The Bell Avenue site consisted of an old citrus grove which has since been overtaken by Brazilian Pepper. The 5.8 acres, of exotics at this location will be removed by equipment. To discourage exotic encroachment from adjacent lands, fencing will be constructed along all property boundaries. For partnership applications, the statement should address the purposes and objectives of the joint project and the division of responsibilities among the partners (including fiscal and management commitments) and include interlocal agreements, if any, relative to the proposed joint project. Not Applicable. For applicant requesting a loan, the statement should also address the need for a loan. Not Applicable. COMPREHENSIVE PLAN IMPLEMENTATION 7 fir/ '~ [Rule 9K-4.0031(12) and Rule 9K-4.004(5)(b)5., F.A.C.] Statement, with cross-references to specific comprehensive plan, goals, objectives and policies and the appropriate provisions in the support documents, describing how the project will assist the local government in implementing the recreation and open space, conservation, or coastal management elements of the comprehensive plan. Through the acquisition and protection of the North Fork of the St. Lucie River Greenway, the following goals, objectives, and policies in County's Comprehensive Plan aze furthered: Coastal Management Element Acquisition of the project lands will provide protection and enhancement of a blackwater stream system, North Fork of the St. Lucie River, within the County's coastal azea. The project lands directly influences the quantity and quality of freshwater entering the North Fork of the St. Lucie River and downstream estuaries, including the Indian River Lagoon. Preservation of the project lands will assist the County in meeting Coastal Management Object 7.1 which limit development impacts on the coastal azea natural resources; Objective 7.1.2 which is designed to protect, conserve, and enhance wildlife habitat in the coastal azea; Objective 7.1.4 which strives to maintain or improve water quality in the Indian River Lagoon. Conservation Element The Conservation Element establishes the goal to protect, appropriately use, or conserve the natural resources in a manner which maximizes their function and values (Goal 8.1). Through the acquisition, preservation and development design of this project site, this will be complied with. Objective 8.1.6, Policy 8.1.6.2, and Policy 8.1.8.8 ("protect and conserve the natural functions of soils" by prohibiting "the use of off-road vehicles in azeas identified as environmentally sensitive") aze complied with through the restriction of unauthorized access into the project boundaries. Policy 8.1.8.1 promotes land development regulations which require the removal of all exotic vegetation from sites and replacement with native vegetation. The acquisition of this project site into public ownership will fiu-ther the increase of natural preserve lands (Objective 8.1.8) through the process established in Policy 8.1.8.11("establish a County Land Acquisition Selection Committee whose function shall be to ... formulate a master acquisition list of lands having native habitats"). Also complied with aze Objective 8.1.12 and Policy 8.1.12.1("identify for conservation and protection" "environmentally sensitive upland ... areas"). Policy 8.1.8.2 state that the land development regulations to be adopted by August 1, 1990, shall include criteria for the protection of all endangered and threatened plant and animal species as well as the conservation of the supporting native habitat. Policy 8.1.8.7 states that St. Lucie County shall include within its Land Development Regulations criteria and standazds to ensure maximum protection of the remaining native plant communities within the County. St. Lucie County Resource Protection, Land Development Code Sec. 6.00.00 implements these policies. Recreation Element Acquisition of the North Fork of the St. Lucie River FCT project lands, will preserve open natural land in an established urban area for passive recreation, thereby fulfilling Goa19.1 and Objective 9.1.1 in the Recreation and Open Space Element (provide active and passive recreation facilities and open space areas which offer a broad range of activities to all'citizens of St. Lucie County.") Policy 9.1.1.1 and Policy 9.1.1.2 establishes the levels of service standazds for Recreation and Open Space and the guideline that these levels of service shall be "achieved 8 ... through an equitable and systematic land acquisition and development program. This project site also complies with Policy 9.1.1.5 (identify ecological communities and designate those azeas for open space and natural preservation, protection, conservation, and appropriate use ...."). Acquiring the site to expand the existing recreational facilities to include passive activities complies with Policy 9.1.1.3 ("The County will continue to correct and improve upon existing deficiencies through additional land acquisition and development...expansion or renovation of existing parks and recreational facilities") Intergovernmental Coordination Element Acquisition of the NFSLR greenway lands will further Goal 10.1 that requires the establishment of effective coordination measure among all pertinent public entities so to best maintain St. Lucie County's quality of life and efficient use of resources. For partnership applications this statement should be based on :the local comprehensive plan of the jurisdiction(s) within which the joint project is located, as well as relevant goals, objectives and policies of the local comprehensive plan of the application partner(s). If the project site is not wholly contained within one jurisdiction, then appropriate sections of the comprehensive plans of the various local governments wherein the project site lies are required to be cited. Not Applicable. CONCEPTUAL MANAGEMENT PLAN AND SOURCE OF FUNDING FOR MANAGEMENT [Rule 9K-4.004(5)(d), F.A.C.] Lands acquired using Preservation 2000 funds shall be managed to make them available for public recreational use, provided that the recreational use does not interfere with the protection of natural resource values. Conceptually describe and identify the existing and proposed physical improvements; how access will be provided; who will be responsible for maintenance and security; staffing requirements; the primary components of site protection, enhancement and restoration; and expected sources of funding for the development and management of the site. The only physical improvements includes unpaved trails. Proposed physical improvements include the removal of the invasive exotic species, primarily Brazilian pepper. Fencing and/or narrowly spaced posts would be installed to prohibit unauthorized vehiculaz access. Nature trails, rest azeas and interpretive signs, picnic tables and a small canoe dock will be provided to accommodate recreation needs along the NFSLR. Access to and use of the NFSLR Greenway Addition would be from S. 25`~ Street, a major arterial roadway, and Bell Avenue a local roadway. Bike lanes and sidewalks are proposed along S. 25`~ and will provide direct access to the S. 25~' Street pazcel. A small unimproved pazking areas will be provided for the public's use and bike stands 9 '~1n+' will be installed to accommodate cyclist. A canoe dock will also be provide from the S. 25`'' Street pazcel. There are no easement, concessions or leases proposed at this time. The responsibility of maintenance and security of the NFSLR Greenway Addition will be undertaken by St. Lucie County's Leisure Services Department. A fence will be constructed along the perimeter of the site, to ensure that dumping of trash or hazardous waste and unauthorized vehicular access does not occur. The Leisure Services Department will monitor the azea in their day to day activities. Leisure Services personnel will contact the Sheriffs Department if they observe any vandalism, trespassing, and other property damage. There is no additional staffing recommended at this site. Several preliminary vegetative and animal surveys have been conducted on the NFSLR Greenway Addition. The removal of exotic plant species will allow for the natural recruitment of native plant communities and expand habitat for wildlife. The removal of exotic plant species will be the primary means utilized in the management of wildlife habitats. Vegetative Communities The NFSLR Greenway Addition supports two (2) native vegetative communities: Hydric Hammock 8.0 ac and Floodplain Swamp 0.6 ac. An estimated 6.6 acres of a dense stand of the exotic Brazilian pepper trees are located along Bell Avenue. Hydric Hammock - 8.0 acres. Hydric hammocks are characterized as a well developed hardwood and cabbage palm forest with a variable understory often dominated by palms and ferns. Hydric hammock occurs on low, flat, wet sites where limestone may be near the surface and frequently outcrops. Soils are sands with considerable organic material that, although generally saturated, aze inundated only for short periods following heavy rains. The 25~' street site contains nearly all of the Hydric hammock community. The overstory consists of Live oak, with an understory of swamp fern, caesaz weed, wild coffee, grape and catbriaz. Floodplain Swamp - 0.6 acres. Floodplain swamps occur on flooded soils along stream channels and in low spots and oxbows within river floodplains. Vegetation consists of Carolina willow, leather fern, primrose willow, swamp lily, duck potato and pickerelweed. The swamp is located on the 25~' street site and encompasses an old oxbow of the North Fork. Wildlife Resources Several inventories have been conducted on the project site by St. Lucie County and U.S. Fish and Wildlife biologist. The native vegetative communities onsite have been determined to provide important wildlife habitat and to support several wildlife species, including the following listed species: Alligator (Alligator mississippiensis)(SSC), Little blue Heron (Egretta caerulea) (SSC), Tricolored heron (Egretta tricolor)(SSC) and White Ibis (Eudocimus albus)(SSC). 10 Resource enhancement programs that address the long term viability of the onsite habitats and listed species aze part of the plan for the NFSLR Greenway Addition. Management programs include exotic species removal, and elimination of trash and unauthorized access. Archaeological and Historic Resource Protection There are no known archaeological or historic resources onsite. 1. Costs Fencing (@5,240 ft) Kiosk (2) Road (900 feet x 26 feet) Canoe launch Canoe dock Picnic tables (3) Parking lots (2) Exotic removal Bike racks (2) Interpretive signage Entrance signs (2) Total $5,100.00 (installed) $1,000.00 3,000.00 500.00 4,000.00 35,000.00 500.00 1,000.00 2.000.00 $52,100.00 2. Sources of Funding for the Development and Management The Florida Greenways & Trails Seed Grant was awarded to the NFSLR Greenway and Trail project in 1999. This source will be pursued to provide funding for improvements on the subject parcels. Funding The local match for the acquisition of NFSLR Greenway Addition will be provided from the St. Lucie County Environmentally Significant Lands Bond Fund. 11 AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. DATE : 5-25-99 REGUL_n?2 [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [~ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTI' COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED B~: Susan Kilmer SUBMITTED BY ( DEPT) : Library SUBJECT: Gates Library Initiative, Florida Local Library Grant Application BACKGROUND: The purpose of Gates Library Initiative (GLI)grants is to expand the availability of public access computing, and to provide. access to the Internet and to digital information through the public library. JNDS AV`IL- funding comes from Gates Foundation ~. aREVIOUS ~.CTION : N/A ~COMI~'..~NDAT ~ 02~:: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commission approves this grant request and authorizes Chairman of the Board to sign the application at the meeting. COMMI SIGN ACTION: ~PROti~,D [ 1 DEFIED ] OTHER: CONCU CE: ..-_.__ ug Berson, Cou ty Aami.nistrator nev:eu ant - v ( ~oanty Attorney: t XN.ct. ~ 3udoet: ~• Purchzs'_n~: ~( C_.c_nat_ns Dept.~C~j~ }LCthec:C O'her: _nance: (Check for copy only, __ applicable) .~ ~~ ~~ ~1r* '~'" M E M O R A N D U M 99 - 122 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Susan B. Kilmer, Library Director DATE: May 18, 1999 SUBJECT: Gates Library Initiative The Gates Foundation is offering grant funds to Libraries throughout the United States to assist in their efforts to expand the availability of public access computing, and to provide access to the Internet and to digital information through the public library. To be eligible for a Gates Library Initiative Grant, a library must be recognized by the State Library of Florida as a public library, be open to public use acting as a public library (not as an administrative facility), serve an area of over 10% poverty, and not have previously received a Gates Library Initiative Grant. The Gates Foundation will be distributing $5,000,000 throughout the State of Florida to public libraries for this project. St. Lucie County is eligible for funding at the Downtown Ft. Pierce Branch Library and the Zora Neale Hurston Branch Library. Our anticipated grant funding will be $33.,594.00, this will be used to purchase 2 content server; 10 standalone public access workstations with Ethernet card and pre-loaded software set; 2 laser printers; internal building wiring; 2 - 24 port hub; and network cabling. Susan B. Kilmer Gates Library Initiative Florida Local Library Applications Application Deadline: Thursday, May 27th, 1999 (a app ications must a postmarke y this date) If you have any questions about the application, please contact Kim Wilson at the Gates Library Initiative (425) 882-1200 ext. 10, or kim@glf.org. When you have completed the application, please send it to: Gates Library Initiative ATTN: Kim Wilson 16625 Redmond Way, STA #M-10 Redmond, WA 98052 Please DO NOT fax the application ~- - -- ~nr'' `.r/~` GATES LIBRARY INITIATIVE Florida State Partnership Application for Local Library Grant From the St. Lucie County Library System (Name of Library) (Date Submitted) `"r~ Grant Applicant Certification Purpose The purpose of Gates Library Initiative (GLI) grants is to expand the availability of public access computing, and to provide access to the Internet and to digital information through the public library. Eligibility Standard To be eligible for a Gates Library Initiative Grant, a library must be recognized by the State Library of Florida as a public library, be open to public use acting as a public library (not as an administrative facility), serve an area of over 10% poverty, and not have previously received a GLI (or GLF) grant. In making this application, we certify that if the grant is approved: 1. The grant funds will be an incremental increase to other current and anticipated library funding and will not replace previously budgeted items. 2. This application is complete and represents the needs of this community. This library system meets the above eligibility standard for Gates Library Initiative funding. 3. All good faith efforts will be made to sustain the public access computing capability established by this grant. Such efforts will be aimed at assuring that all computers and peripheral equipment are kept fully operational and appropriately supplied. Also, every effort will be made to assure adequate public funding for the proper maintenance and eventual replacement of the equipment provided by this grant. 4. The applicant understands that grants will be made only to public libraries that provide unmediated access to computers for public use, and will operate and administer the computers and Internet access without charges or fees to library patrons. Signatures: Library System St Lucie Countv Librarv Svstem Library Director: Name Signature Date Library Board Chair: Name Signature Date Appropriate Local Funding Authority: Name_ Title Signature Date Contact Information `rr/ (1) Name of Library (required: St. Lucie County Library System Address: 124 N. Indian River Drive JULY 1999: 101 Melody Lane City, State, Zip: Fort Pierce, FL 34950-4331 Fort Pierce, FL 34950-4402 Phone 561-462-1615 Fax: 561-462-2750 Email: Library web site URL, if any: www , st-lucie .lib . f 1. us (Z) Grant administrative contact (required: Edward K. Werner Phone: 561-462-1615 Fax: 561-462-2750 Email: ewerner@stlucieco .gov (3) Main technical contact (required: Fran Frazer Phone: 561-462-1615 Fax; 561-462-2750 Email: franf@stlucieco.gov (4) Main training contact (required : John Byrn Phone: 561-462-1615 Fax: 561-462-2750 Email: j byrn@stlucieco .gov Contact information if different from Grant administrative contact (5) Name: Susan B. Kilmer Title: Library Director Address: 124 N. Indian River Drive, Fort Pierce, FL 34950-4331 Phone 561-462-1615 Fax: 561-462-2750 Email: susank@stlucieco.gov ~" ~ Project Narratives Please carefully review and follow the instructions for this section when completing your project narratives. Please submit at least one page on each of the three topics, following the outline format provided, and repeating each subtopic heading. Begin your narratives on an attached blank page. Topic 1 -Need GLI's funding is targeted at those libraries serving low-income communities, where the need is the greatest and the fewest people have computers and Internet access at home. (Definition: For the purposes of this narrative, consider "need" as directly referring to the people in your community who are at or below poverty levels, and persons who are caught in the "digital divide," -that is, those who do not have ready access to personal computers or the Internet.) In the context of this principle, your narrative should include the following: (a) Describe the basic demographics of your community related to need (including such things as poverty data, employment rates, education levels, literacy rates, income, ethnicity, industry and business). (b) Describe the needs, as you understand them, for public access computing and access to the Internet in your community. Include those persons caught in the "digital divide" - i.e., those persons who do not have access to computers and the Internet in their homes, at work, or at school. Also, address the specific needs of your current patron base. (c) Identify those persons in your community who are not current library users. Describe your current programs and activities for reaching those persons who are not current library users. Please be specific about howyou inform these potential patrons of the services the library provides, what kinds of special prograr„ming that is directed at these persons, and how you have initiated these programs. (d) Based on these descriptions, please now describe your plans for using the GLI granted PCs to address these needs in your community. It is very important for you to describe these plans as specifically as possible. Please be specific about how this grant will address the needs of those persons caught in the "digital divide", those in your community who are not current library users, and your current library users - i.e., all of those persons described in (b) and (c) above. 'mod Topic 1 - Need a. Describe the basic demographics of your community related to need (including such things as poverty data, employment rates, education levels, literacy rates, income, ethnicity, industry and businessl• St. Lucie County, Florida, has an estimated population (1997) of 179, 133, 15.3$ of which is African American and 5.9~ Hispanic (St. Lucie County Perspective 1998, University of Florida, 1998). In the tri- county area, it has the highest overall poverty rate, 15.4, ahead of Indian River County (11~) and Martin County (10$). St. Lucie County also lags behind its neighbors in the educational level of it residents with 71.7$ high school graduates and 13.1 college graduates. Per capita income in the County is a low $15,773 (U.S. Census Bureau website). The economy is still primarily agricultural with most other employment in the areas of education and service. The County has not attracted any large-scale industry. Greater Fort Pierce is home to the majority of African Americans and has suffered from gradual economic decline over the past decade. Attempts are now underway to revitalize the City's neighborhoods. b. Describe the needs, as you understand them, for public access computing and access to the Internet in our community. Include those persons caught in the "digital divide" - i.e., those persons who do not have access to computers and the Internet in their homes, at work, or at school. Also address the specific needs of your current patron base. Due to previous County policy and, more recently, the lack of sufficient band-width for the Library System's network, Internet access has not been available directly to our patrons. It has been offered with staff interface. This has severely limited use of electronic resources which are already in place: Britannica Online, EBSCOHost Databases, and NewsBank/NewsFile. Patrons have been requesting direct Internet access, but we have had to send them to St. Lucie West Library, a joint-use facility owned by Indian River Community College in which we participate along with Florida Atlantic University. St. Lucie County has become an information ghetto with its neighbors in Martin County part of the SEFLIN Free-Net which offers non-graphic Internet access with free e-mail accounts to all residents with a PC and modem, and those in Indian River County accessing a local network called IRENE. c. Identify those persons in your community who are not current library users. Describe your current programs and activities for reaching those persons who are not current library users. Please be specific about how you inform these potential patrons of the services the library provides, what kinds of special programming that is directed at these persons, and how you have initiated these programs. The Zora Neale Hurston Branch Library supports the largest and least affluent population base in its immediate vicinity of any St. Lucie County Library site. Unfortunately this Branch also has a relatively low circulation rate. We have attempted to attract greater usage through evening lecture series, providing tutorial space for Learn-to- Read of St. Lucie County, and children's programs. Community organizations have participated in canvassing neighborhoods to register new patrons. The summer reading programs are also an excellent opportunity to bring both parents and children into the Library. d. Based on these descriptions, please now describe your plans for using the GLI granted PCs to address these needs in your community. It is very important for you to describe these plans as specifically as possible. Please be specific about how this grant will address the needs of those persons caught in the "digital divide, " those in your community who are not current library users, and your current library users - i.e., all of those persons described in (bl and (cl above. At this time the only access to the Internet and online electronic resources for our patrons who do not have a computer at home is at St. Lucie West Library. This is not practical for young people or adults without access to automobiles to get there from Fort Pierce. The GLI PCs will bring not only Internet access but also the wide array of reference titles for children, youth and adults otherwise unaffordable to a community which would otherwise be left in an information vacuum. These electronic resources will enrich the lives not only of those in the communities within the immediate service range of the Main and Hurston Branch Libraries, but all the residents of St. Lucie County. "~ Project Narratives Topic 2 -Partnerships Funding should help build partnerships between GLI and grant recipients, between grant recipients and their communities, and within the library. (Definition: For the purposes of this narrative, "partnerships" refers to any joint relationships your library has established, or plans to establish, with other organizations or agencies in the community - for example, schools, chambers of commerce, literacy groups, senior citizen groups, local businesses or industries. While these relationships will certainly involve services provided by the library, they should also be characterized by some form of mutual benefit to the library as well. The partnerships that you identify need not be strictly focused on technology, but should serve the purpose of demonstrating the library's ability to develop similar partnerships in support of the GLI grant.) In the context of this principle, your narrative should include the following: (a) Describe the existing community partnerships in which your library cun-ently participates, the participants, and the mutual services or resources this partnership provides to each participant. (b) A description of your plans to use the opportunity of the GLI grant to build new partnerships within your community. Please be specific in naming the participants involved in the partnership. ~r-'' '~ Topic 2 - Partnerships a. Describe the existing community partnerships in which your library currently participates, the participants, and the mutual services or resources this partnership provides to each participant. The St. Lucie County Library System has a long tradition of building information and service partnerships within the tri-county Treasure Coast area. The most ambitious to date has been participation with Indian River Community College (IRCC) and Florida Atlantic University (FAU) in the St. Lucie West Library, a joint-use facility owned and operated by IRCC. The Library System provides a full-time staff member, a rental collection of new publications and a core reference collection. IRCC offers Internet access and word processing for all patrons. In cooperation with the Friends of the St. Lucie County Library, Evolution Communications (EvCom) hosts the Library System's website free as a public service in exchange for publicity and tax credits. The St. Lucie County Historical Museum and St. Lucie County Agricultural Extension Service libraries are being cataloged into the Library System's online bibliographic database. This permits remote catalog access to their staff members as well as our patrons. Learn- to-Read of St. Lucie County has been an active partner with the Library System since its formation in 1981 with the Library providing materials funding, board representation and tutorial space to develop new readership. TCI Cablevision and Adelphia Cable have supplied free cable service to all Library System sites in the County for publicity and tax credits. Two new technology projects are now in the process of implementation with the School Board of St. Lucie County: A joint-use computer lab will be opened at the Morningside Branch Library in the south end of the County in late summer and Distance Learning Centers are being assembled at Morningside and Lakewood Park Branch Library at the north end of the County. The Tri County Computer User Group has committed itself to provide volunteer trainers for public instruction at the Morningside computer lab. b. A description of your plans to use the opportunity of the GLl grant to build new partnerships within your community. Please be specific in naming the participants involved in the partnership. The GLI grant. will provide the St. Lucie County Library .System with the most advanced electronic access which we have ever been able to offer to our patrons, particularly in the Fort Pierce area served by the Main and Zora Neale Hurston Branch Libraries. Several sororities and church organizations within the African-American community will participate to publicize the new technology available to all age groups without the need to travel distances. They include the Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Eta Eta Omega Chapter, and Zeta Phi Beta Sorority, Zeta Eta Zeta Chapter, from whom letters of support for this grant are attached. The Tri County Computer User Group will extend its volunteer training program to Fort Pierce to help with public instruction in the use of the electronic resources. ~ A ~' K ~A ~~E `DFS ArUMeN 7C1H~t''C Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, incorporated ETA ETA OMEGA CHAPTER Mrs. Susan Kilmer, Library Director St. Lucie County Library System Fort Pierce, FL 34954 Dear Mrs. Kilmer: This letter is in support of the Gates Library Initiative for the placement of computers in the Hesston Branch Library. The members of Eta Eta Omega Chapter of Alpha Kappa Alpha, Inc. would like to encourage the committee to approve the computers because of the positive impact it would have on the library and the members of the community. Alpha Kappa Alpha Sorority, Inc., Eta Eta Omega Chapter of Fort Pierce is a service organization of college women who sponsors programs and activities that benefit the community. We have been in partnership with the Hurston Branch Library for many programs such as: Reading program for children and aduhs featuring the Mets baseball players, Door to door campaign for library patrons, Teen literatwe seminars, and research activities for mathematics and science students. Our current program focus is the mentoring of at risk third grade students. We will bond with the students during their third grade year and stay with them through their entry into middle school. A variety of tutorial activities will be planned for after school and Saturdays. The Hurston Branch Library will play a vital role in this program by providing access to a variety of learning activities on all levels such as: Use of technology (computers) for parents and students, research activities for students, tutorial lessons in mathematics and reading, and parent information sessions and seminars. Our involvement with the Hurston Branch Library in other programs increased the usage of the facilities by the community and we are certain this program will do the same. Our challenge is to make a difference in ow community. We are swe that we can accomplish that with an ongoing partnership with the Hurston Branch Library. The addition of the computers at the library will enhance that partnership by providing an entry into technology for parents and students. We would like you thank you in advance for your efforts on behalf of the Hurston Branch Library and ow community. If we may provide you with any additional information during yow consideration of this venture, please do not hesitate to contact us. Thank you, ~ ~, ~ ~ Betty J. Robinson, President cc: Sandra Gebert ~_._:. Fiurston Branch Library Supervisor POST OFFICE BOX 1375 FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34954 ZETA ETA ZETA CHAPTER ~~ *~~*~* ~*~ ~l?~~x ~~t ~~~~r ~~arxxrTf~, ~ xt~c. z~ P.O. BOX 1975 FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34954 TO: Susan Kilmer, Library Director FROM: Zeta Eta Zeta Chapter of Zeta Phi Beta Sorority, Inc. DATE: May 17, 1999 RE: Gates Library Initiatives Grant The members of Zeta Eta Zeta Chapter of Zeta Phi Beta Sorority, Inc. gladly wishes to support the Zora Neale Hurston Branch Library in their pursuit to obtain the Gates Library Initiatives Grant. Listed below aze various ways we plan to continue to inform our community about the new and improved technology equipment the library will be receiving: 1. Encourage the surrounding schools to use the library. 2. Encourage the community to use the library for various research reports . ,~~ ~~~*~,~ z~ 3. Encourage the students in the community to use the library for completing science fair, black history reports and etc. 4. Encourage the local Daycare Centers to bring the preschoolers to the library in order to introduce them to computers prior to going to public school 5. Encourage the community churches to use the library to teach interested persons about computers. If we can be of further assistance to you, please don't hesitate to contact us. Sincerely yours, e ~. ~~~~% Ange e D. Singletary President cc: Sandra Gebert Zora Neale Hurston Branch Library Supervisor `/' Project Narratives Topic 3 - Levera~in~ and Sustainability Funding should serve as a catalyst for others -government, business, foundations, and individuals - to support the public library as an institution and to make a priority of providing broad public access to information technologies and to encourage long-term local technological and financial sustainability. (Definition: For the purposes of this narrative, "leveraging" means using the opportunity of the GLI grant to encourage organizations or agencies -for example, local government, businesses, foundations, Rotary Clubs -- to provide additional funding or in-kind contributions to expand or enhance the capabilities provided by the grant. "Sustainability" addresses the library's plans to build appropriate support for, and maintenance of, the GLI grant equipment and connectivity into its future operating budgets, and to focus any leveraged funds or services toward such support and maintenance over time.) In the context of this principle, your narrative should include the following: (a) Describe your plans for seeking additional funding or in-kind support, from both your traditional as well as alternative funding sources. If you have already received confirmation of funding pledges from the community, local businesses, foundation or other organizations, please attach a copy of those letters confirming the level of support. (b) Describe your plans for sustaining the computing and Internet access capabilities that the GLI grant will provide for your library. Please be specific on how these capabilities will be sustained. (c) Describe your plans to maintain the computers awarded through the grant and provide patron service in the years to come. It is very important for you to describe these plans as specifically as possible. `r.-` Topic 3 -Leveraging and Sustainability a. Describe your plans for seeking additional funding or in-kind support, from both your traditional as well as alternative funding sources. If you have already received confirmation of funding pledges from the community, local businesses, foundation or other organizations, please attach a copy of those letters confirming the level of support. With a 72~ discount from the Federal E-Rate program, the St. Lucie County Library System is in the process of purchasing $37,728 worth of hardware for the upgrade of our current ISDN connections to T1 frame= relay to expand our ability to provide Internet access at sufficient line speed. The Library System is also about to receive the first batch of ten multimedia public Internet access PCs from an anonymous donor who may provide an additional ten once we have installed the first units. These will be our very first PCs to provide direct Internet access to our patrons. We shall also be receiving a 550,000 Florinet grant from the State Library of Florida with which we will be purchasing more powerful replacement public access PCs, printers for the public, and three data projectors to assist in providing better training to both our staff and the public. b. Describe your plans fvr sustaining the computing and Internet access capabilities that the GLI grant will provide for your library. Please be specific on how these capabilities will be sustained. The St. Lucie County Library System is committed to providing full electronic access to our patrons. It has been a long path for us to reach this point where we can offer the Internet, but along the way we have made preparations by establishing subscriptions to Britannica Online, EBSCOHost Databases, and NewsBank/NewsFile with access from the Library website. Once public Internet is a reality, additional online databases will be added. The GLI PCs will add an additional dimension of electronic access for our .patrons at the Main and Hurston Branch Libraries. The current Federal E-Rate program permits access to the needed T1 frame-relay connections through its generous discount, but we must always be ready to assume the full cost on our own should the program be cut or end. In such times of unexpected need we are fortunate to be able to rely on the Friends of the St. Lucie County Library. It will be a high priority to continue the training program for our patrons which the GLI grant will set in place. c. Describe your plans to maintain the computers awarded through the grant and provide patron service in the years to come. It is very important for you to describe these plans as specifically as possible. It has become Library policy not to allow computer hardware to fall so far behind in coming years since we have learned the hard way that it is a disservice to our patrons and staff as well. The St. Lucie County Library System began with Fiscal Year 1998/1999 to budget yearly to upgrade or replace older PCs. For Fiscal Year 1999/2000 we budgeted to deal with the remaining obsolete PCs, but the County has decided to fund this project from its Y2K fund. Inasmuch as St. Lucie County Automated Services will not provide hardware support for computers ~rr+' which they did not build, we shall be seeking an outside contractor for maintenance. 1 Service Area i Please complete the following 3 sections: ~. of More than 1) Please place a check mark next to Guidplines booklet for the definitionso U ban andSee Instructions in the Grant Making Cooperative systems.) x Urban Library System LSA > 100,000 _ Cooperative Library System LSA > 100,000 _ Urban Library System LSA > 300,000 Cooperative Library System LSA > 300,000 2) You are invited to send technology staff and training staff to Seattle for special GCTA training. Based on your selection in question 1, please use the following table below to determine the number of staff members eligible to attend training. IT Training Edward K. Werner Trainer Training 1 John Byrn 2. Fran Frazer 2• Sandra Gebert 3) Please describe whyyou selected these staff members to attend training and what their roles will be in supporting this grant. If this grant is causing a significant change ui job duties, please explain why and how this will help your library system Dr. Werner is the Assistant Library Director and technology coordinator for the Library System. He will be involved in administration, installation and maintenance. Mrs. Frazer, Library Systems Specialist, is head of Network Support responsible for maintaining and trouble-shooting computer problems. Dr. Byrn and Ms. Gebert are Librarian Its in charge of reference services at the Central Library and Hurston Branch respectively. Their roles will be that of trainers for staff and patrons in the use of the electronic resources provided by the GLI. List the names of the staff members you would like to attend training in the table below. '~ `r.I Public Libraries -Eligibility List Library Building Partial Library Grant Building Grant Outlet MSA Sppp SPOV (SPOV >= 10%) (SPOV < 10%) Library Name Gty _. ~t~ ~.. _. a. ,. . _ . "' ; g _ .. St. Lucie County Library System ~ ~ ,' ~ ~ ~ ,. ~.. W ~~ „`' CE ` .'~~~ ~ CC ~ . 1 935 I ~ o ~G.81 to ~ ~ .~_ ~ D " LUCIE COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM ST FORT PIERCE . LAKEWOOD PARK BRANCH LIBRARY FORT PIERCE BR NC 20.735 ~ 7.81% MORNINGSIDE BRANCH LIBRARY PORT ST. LUCIE BR NC 42,313 ~ 5.24% LUCIE BRANCH LIBRARY PORT ST PORT ST. LUCIE BR NC 45,459 ~ 5.07% . PORT ST. LUCIE BR NC 19,426 ~ a.38% S[. Lucie Wes[ Library RSTON BRANCH LIBRAR FORT PIERCE BR NC 51.807 26.65% Q ZORA NEALE HU Page 128 of 154 4/= 0/99 8:44:24 AM ~../ St. Lucie County Library System~.r CENTRAL LIBRARY BACKGROUND INFORMATION SECTION 1: Central Library Address (After June 1999) GLI Records Shippino address ST. LUCIE COUNTY LIBRARY SYSTEM Plense do nor use P O Brra 101 Melody Lane FORT PIERCE FL 34950 -4~ (~61) 462-161 Verify address and supply shipping address if missing. SECTION 2: Library System Information Answers are based on existing building. Central Library Hours of Operation 9 00 am/p~r to 9:00 am/prrr to 9:00 a~,p~- to 9:00 am/par to 9.00 am/p~rr to 9:00 am/~r to N A am/pm to We move in June 1999. GLF Kecoras ~.orrecu, Number of library buildings 5 Number of total employees (FI'E) 66 Total population served 175,458 Current Year total budget $2,993,812.00 Local per capita funding ea . $18 .00 Building square footage 14,500 Number of registered borrowers 120.659 Total circulation for last full calendar year 786,439 Do you track building level use statistics'? Yes ^No Does the building have a meeting room? Yes ^No How many meeting rooms does the building have? 1 Please list the size (in square feet) and the capacity of each meeting room: 529 (30) SECTION 4: Existing Public Access Pentium PC's at Central Library Number of public access Pentium PC's (Pentium P133 or better and a minimum of 16 MB of memory): 1 SECTION 5: TechnicaUTraining Support at Central Library Technical Staff ___ Number of staff and full-time equivalent employees (FTE) devoted to supporting technology: 4 Library staff Person responsible for installation and maintenance of GLI- funded PCs: Edward K. Werner Title: Assistant Library Director Phone:561-462-1615 Fax: 561-462-2750 Email address: ewerner@stlucieco.gov Total hours per week to be devoted to technical support: 5 Antici ated technical assistance from non-staff member Name: Chuck Satchwill Affiliation (e.g. community member, local high school student, etc.): St Lucie County Automated Service Phone : 561-462-1759 Fax: 561-462-1443 Total hours per week to be devoted to technical support: 5 Training Staff Number of staff and full-time equivalent employees (FTE) devoted to supporting training: 3 Library staff Person responsible for training: John B rn Title: Librarian II Phone: 561-462-1615 Fax: 561-462-2750 Email address: ;t,~'rn@stlucieco.gov Total hours per week to be devoted to training: 10 Antici ated training assistance from non-staff member Name: Volunteer Affiliation (e.g. community member, local high school student, etc.): Tri County Computer User Group Phone :561-878-3117 Fax: 5 Total hours per week to be devoted to training support: SECTION 3: Measurements of Population and Poverty for Central Library Facility _ _ -, _c L..a.7:.,.. on~~.; r•a nnn„l ati ntt Ill t)OVertV: 26.817P 'iir~ Electricity St.-Lucie County Library System CENTRAL LIBRARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR GRANT IMPLEMENTATION Computers Total number of computers: Number of Pentiums: Number of 486s: Other computer(s): Computers being used as network machines to access the Internet: Netwnrking ~/" Number of computers networked: 34 Coaxial used to connect network? (Y or N) N Length of coaxial cable (in feet): N A Is ]OBase-T used to connect network? (Y or N) Y Number of hubs (If lOBase-T used): 9 Number of available ports (If I OBase-T used): 14 is 100Base-T used in your building? (Y or N) N Do you have free 100Base-T ports? (Y or N) N Number of available ports (If 100Base-T used): NSA Using a repeater? (Y or N) N Number of computers on the same circuit: Has the electricity been checked by an electrician? How many more machines can be added within the electrical capacity of the building? )nline Public Access Catalog (OPAC) ')PAC Vendor: Sirsi Operating System: Number of OPAC terminals: 42 software: Unicorn ~' Unix ^ NT Does the OPAC have a web interface? Yes ^No Release Version: 98.4 ^ VMS ^ Other. please specifi-: Site Preparation (Central Library) 1. Vl l C~.lIV11J/:1VUIa1V1101 a In June 1999 the Main Library will be moving from the present site (124 N. Indian River Dr Fort Pierce, FL 34950-4331) to a new building across the street (101 Melody Lane, Fort Pierce, FL 34950-4402). The new building will have 22,000 square feet of space with two meetings rooms: 808 (90) and 192 (12). 36 Of the total number of computers: ~- Number for Staff Use only: 29 21 ~ 1 Number for Public Access: 18 Questions? Call GCTA Networking Support at 1-888-289-8989, press 1 for Statewide Partnership Grant recipients, and select the Network Support option for assistance. St. Lucie County Library System CENTRAL LIBRARY PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER INFORMATION Please provide dte,(ollowing information for each Public Access Computer. Public Access Computers 1. Processor ~, ^ Pentium [XI 486 ^ Other: 2 RAM ', ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ®Other: 8MR 3. Operating System ^Window NT ^Window 95 ^Window 3.11 ®Window 3.1 ^ Other: ', 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? 5• Is the computer Internet connection '~ ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the Internet? ^ Type of access '~^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): iln~ corn EBSCO Magazine Summaries Infotrac Public Access Computers 1. Processor ', ^ Pentium [~ 486 ^ Other: 2. RAM ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ®Other: ~ 3. Operating System ^Window NT ^Window 95 ^Window 3.11 ® Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? 5. Is the computer Internet connection ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the - _ - Internet? ^ Type of access ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): WinWay Resume EBSCO Magazine Summaries Unicorn tiI` '`rd St. Lucie County Library System CENTRAL LIBRARY PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER INFORMATION Plensr provide the jollowin3 injormntion for each Public Access Computer. Public Access Computers 1. Processor 2. RAM 'r/ [~ Pentium ^ 486 ^ Other: ® 16 MB ^ 32 MB ^ Other: • 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 [~ Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? [~; 5• Is the computer Internet connection ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection i connected to the ~ ~ Internet? ^ Type of access I ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface i 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): `In~otrac EBSGO Magazine Sutttmaries Unicorn Public Access Computers 1. Processor ^ Pentium ~ 486 ^ Other: ~ 2. RAM I ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB [~ Other: ~MB i 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 ~~ Window 3.1 ^ Other: i 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? ~. Is the computer Internet connection i ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection ~ connected to the i ~ Internet? ^ Type of access I I ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface ~ 6. Pease list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): •Eooks. in. Print --BBSCO -Magazine Summaries Unicorn •'~--::. ~-` St. Lucie County Library System CENTRAL LIBRARY PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER INFORMATION Please provide the following injonnation jor each Public Access Campurer. err/' Public Access Computers 1. Processor ~ ^ Pentium ~~ 486 ^ Other: ~ 2. RAM ^ 16 MB ^ 32 M$ ~ Other: . 8MB 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 (~ Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? [~ 5• Is the computer Internet connection ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the Internet? ^ Type of access i ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface b. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): IJniea'rn WiriWay Resume NewsBank Public Access Computers 1. Processor ^ Pentium ®486 ^ Other: ?~ RAM I ©16 MB ^ 32 MB ^ Other: 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 i I (~ Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? ^ ~. Is the computer Internet connection j ^ Dedicated Line connected to the ~ ^ Dial-up connection I 'D Internet. Type of access ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface ; 6. Please List the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): •Wnrc~RPrf cr (onl software) ,~__ `~r-' St. Lucie County Library System CENTRAL LIBRAR2' PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER INFORMATION Please provide the following injornwrion jor each Public Access Canpurer. Public Access Computers 1. Processor 2. RAM ^ Pentium [~ 486 ^ Other: ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ~ Other: . 8MB 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 [~ Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? 5• Is the computer Internet connection ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the Internet? ^ Type of access i ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface i 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): •WoYdPerfect (only software) Public Access Computers i. Processor ^ Pentium ^ 486 ^ Other: 2. RAM I ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ~i Other: i 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 I ^ Window 3.1 ^ Other: _ ~. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? ~. Is the computer Internet connection I ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection ~ connected to the ' Internet? ^ Type of access ~ ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e. g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): rtid' ^ Window 3.11 ~ _._. St. Lucie County Library System +~ `""''~` CENTRAL LIBRARY INTERNET CONNECTIVITY INFORMATION FOR GRANT IMPLEMENTATION Current Internet Connection Is the library building currently connected to the Internet? ©Yes ^No Is this connection shared with your branches? [Yes ^No But not from the Main Library Who is your current Internet Service Provider (ISP): C ber ate Do you plan to switch? LAYes ^No Who will you switch to? FIRN What type of connection are you using? ®Dedicated line ^ Dial-up connection If dedicated con~tectio~i: How many computers share this building's dedicated Internet connection? 18 Method used to make the connection: ®ISDN ^Dedicated Point-to-Point ^ Frame Relay ^ADSL ^ Cable Modem ^ Other What is the speed of your connection? ^ 56 Kb/s ®128 Kb/s ^ 256 Kb/s ^ 512 Kb/s ^ T1 ^ Other N/A Model: N/A If you use a router, what is the brand and model? Brand: Who owns the router? ^ Library ^ Internet Service Provider (ISP) ^ Other Vnune runitc taccess •.a~a.~~ ~.~, ~~, ~•~~..~-~- Does your library system have a centralized OPAC used by your branches? ®Yes ^No If yes, please answer the following questions: Are your branches connected to your central OPAC via a Wide Area Network (WAN)? ^n Yes ^No How do your branches connect to your OPAC? ^Dedicated line ^ Dial-up connection ®ISDN Do you have routers at your branches? ^Yes ~NO If you do have routers, what is the brand and model? N/A Router Mode] N/A Router Brand What protocol does your connection use? ~ TCP/IP ^ LAT ^ Other Do users access your OPAC via PCs or terminals? ®PCs ®Terminals Both Do you use your OPAL network to provide access to the Internet? ^Yes ®No r..«,._..,,. ~,.,..,o,..:,,., v~~.,~ Do you plan to connect the GLI donated equipment to the Internet? ®Yes ^No If no, please explain: How do you plan to connect to the Internet? ~ Dedicated line ^ Dial-up connection «'ho will be your ISP? FIRN ~~'ho is your contact at the ISP? Mahmood Haq Contact phone: 850-486-7958 Contact email: mhaq@popmail. firn. edu What is your expected monthly ISP cost? NONE «'hat is your expected one-titne installation fee for connectivity? Waved Do you plan to build a Wide Area Network (WAN)? ®Yes ^No Upgrading WAN from ISDN What technology is planned for the WAN connections? ^ ISDN ©Frame Relay ^Dedicated Point-to-Point ^ADSL ^ Cable Modem ^ Other R'hat is your local phone company? BellSouth If you have a contact at the local phone company, please provide the following: Contact name: Robert Fredericks Contact phone: 800-433-2355 R'hat router equipment are you planning on using (in the Central location)? Router Brand: Router Mode]: Additional Comments: Questions? Call GCTA Networking Support at 1-888-289-8989, press 1 for Statewide Partnership Grant rectp~ents, ana seiec~ inc i~c~wv~r. ouNpvi~ ~N.~.,~~ •~• u~~•~•••••~~• `~1 TECHNOLOGY SURVEY FOR LIBRARIES ELIGIBLE FOR PARTIAL LIBRARY BUILDING GRANT (SPOV < 10%) St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY TECHNOLOGY SURVEY - LAKEWOOD PARK BRANCH LIBRARY Library Branch Information GLI Records 7605 SANTA BARBARA DRIVE FORT PIERCE FL 34951 - 2141 (561)462-6870 ShiQpin~ address (Enter shipping address if different from above) Plense donor use PO Box Total number of employees (FTE) 9 Branch Manager: Caro] Shroyer Phone: 561-462-6870 Fax: 561-462-6874 Email address: carols stlucieco.~,,ov tJRL for library's website: www. st-lueie .lib . f 1. us/ lwp.htm Veri ~ a ress an supp y s lipping address if nussutg. Computers Total number of computers: 1 g Of the total number of computers: Number of Pentiums: 6 Number for Staff Use only: 7 Number of 486s: ~_ Number for Public Access: 6 Other computer(s): 1 Internet Connection Is the library building currently connected to the Internet? Yes ^No Is this connection coming from the Central Library? ^Yes ®No What type of connection are you using? ®Dedicated line ^ Dial-up connection If dedicated connection: How many computers share this building's dedicated Internet connection? 4 Method used to make the connection: ~ ISDN ^Dedicated Point-to-Point ^ Frame Relay ^ ADSL ^ Cable Modem ^ Other: What is the speed of your connection? ^ 56 Kb/s ~ 128 Kb/s ^ 256 Kbls ^ 512 Kb/s ^ TI ^ Other: i If you use a router, what is the brand and model? Brand: N/A Model: N/A Who owns the router? ^ Library ^ Internet Service Provider (ISP) ^ Other Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC) Answer only if different from your central library Same UPC Vendor: Operating System: Number of OPAC terminals: ~oft~~are: ^ Unix ^ NT Does the OPAC have a web interface? ^Yes ^No Release Version: ^ VMS ^ Other. please specify: Questions? Call GCTA Networking Support at 1-888-289-8989, press 1 for Statewide Partnership Grant recipients, and select the Network Support option for assistance. `fir"' St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER INFORMATION LAKEWOOD PARK BRANCH LIBRARY Please provide the following information for each Public Access Cwnpurer. Public Access Computers 1. Processor ®Pentium ^ 486 ^ Other: w~ 2. RAM ~~ ®16 MB ^ 32 MB ^ Other 3. Operating System !i ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 ', !I ~ Window 3.1 ^ Other: ~' -- 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? ~ ~• Is the computer Internet connection ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the - - - -. Internet? ^ Type of access ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): Groliers SIRS Animals (San Diego Zoo) Public Access Computers ~-- - - 1. Processor I ^ Pentium ® 486 ^ Other: 2. RAM ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ~ Other: 8MB 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 ~ Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? ~. Is the computer Internet connection ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the ------- - - ~----- -- - _- Internet? ^ Type of access ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, e[c.): Groliers SIRS Animals (San Diego Zoo) ~Ir'*"' St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER INFORMATION LAKEWOOD PARK BRANCH LIBRARY Please provide theJollowing injornuitinn jor each Public Access Computer. Public Access Computers 1. Processor ^ Pentium ®486 ^ Other: ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ®Other: RMR ~ 2. RAM ~ 3. Operating System ~~ ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 ® Window 3.1 ^ Other: ~ 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? ~• Is the computer Internet connection i ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the ~ Internet? ^ Type of access ~ ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): Unicorn (only software) Public Access Computers 1. Processor ~ ^ Pentium ©486 ^ Other: 2. RAM ~ ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ^~ Other: ~- 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 ~ Window 3.1 ^ Other 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? 5. Is the computer Internet connection ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the Internet? ^ Type of access ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): Unicorn (only software) ~- - -- ~4r'` St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER INFORMATION LAKEWOOD PARK BRANCH LIBRARY Please provide the following inJornwtion for each Public Access Computer. Public Access Computers 1. Processor ^ Pentium X^ 486 ^ Other: ' ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ®Other: AMR 2. RAM i 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ®Window 3.1 ^ Other: _ 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? 5• Is the computer Internet connection ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the Internet? ^ Type of access ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): Unicorn (on .y software) Public Access Computers 1. Processor ~ ^ Pentium ®486 ^ Other: 2. RAM ~ ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ®Other: 8MB 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 9~ ^ Window 3.11 I ®Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? ~. Is the computer Internet connection i ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the Internet? ^ T e of access i ^ Text-based Interface yp ~ ^ Graphical Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on [his machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): ^ Window 3.11 Unicorn SIRS `~ TECHNOLOGY SURVEY FOR LIBRARIES ELIGIBLE FOR PARTIAL L:[BRARY BUILDING GRANT (SPOV < 10 oIo ) St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY TECHNOLOGY SURVEY - MORNINGSIDE BRANCH LIBRARY Library Branch Information _ GLI Records 2410 SE Morningside Blvd. PORT ST. LUCIE FI- (561) 337-5632 34952 - `i421 Shipping address (Enter shipping address if different from above) Plense Flo not u.ee PO Box Computers ress rj mrssrng. Total number of computers: _~_ Number of Pentiums: g Number of 486s: 3 Other computer(s): 2 Number for Staff Use only: 7 Number for Public Access: 6 Is the library building currently connected to t:te Internet? ®Yes ^No Is this connection coming from the Central Library? ^Yes ®No What type of connection are you using? ®Dedicated line ^ Dial-up connection /f dedicated connection: How many comp~lters share this building's dedicated Internet connection? 4 Method used to make the connection: ®ISDN ^Dedicated Point-to-Point ^ Frame Relay ^ ADSL ^ Cable Modem ^ Other: What is the speed of your connection? ^ ` 6 Kb/s ®128 Kb/s ^ 256 Kb/s ^ 512 Kb/s ^ T 1 ^ Other: If you use a router, what is the brand and model? Brand: N/A Model: N/A «'ho owns the router? ^ Library ^ Internet Service Provider (ISP) ^ Other Online Public Access Catalog (OPAL) Answer onry rj arjjerenrJrom your cei~nui ~,~,u~ y game OPAL Vendor: Operating System: Number of OPAC terminals: Software: ^ Urix ^ NT Does the OPAC have a web interface? ^Yes ^No Release Version: ^ VP~1S ^ Other. please specify: Total number of employees (FTE) 10 Branch Manager: Constance Richardson Phone: 561-337-5632 Fax: 561-337-5631 Email address: connier stlucieco.l~ov _ URL for library's website: ~yt , s t-lucie ,lib . f 1. us / msb.htm Of the total number of computers: Questions? Call GCTA Networking Support at 1-888-289-8989, press 1 for Statewide Partnership Grant recipients, and select the Network Support option for assistance. - St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER INFORMATION MORNINGSIDE BRANCH LIBRARY Please provide dte following information for each Public Access Computer. Public Access Computers 1. Processor ! ^ Pentium © 486 ^ Other: __ __ 2. RANI ~'~ ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ®Other: 7808K 3. Operating System '~ ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 IxJ Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? 5• Is the computer Internet connection I, ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the - Internet? ^ Type of access ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): SIRS Groliers Unicorn Public Access Computers 1. Processor ^ Pentium ®486 ^ Other: 2. RAM ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ~ Other: 8MR 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 Y~iJ Window 3.1 ^ Other: - 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? 5. Is the computer Internet connection ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the _ _ Internet? ^ Type of access ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): ^ Window 3.11 SIRS Groliers Unicorn St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER INFORMATION MORNINGSIDE BRANCH LIBRARY Please provide the following injormarion jor each Public Access Computer. Public Access Computers 1. Processor r.rl` ® Pentium ^ 486 ^ Other: 2. RAM ®16 MB ^ 32 MB ^ Other: j 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 ~ Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? 5• Is the computer Internet connection ~ ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection i connected to the Internet? ^ Type of access ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): SIRS Groliers Unicorn Public Access Computers 1. Processor ^ Pentium ^ 486 ®Other: 286 2. RAM ~ ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ®Other: 640K 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 ^ Window 3.1 ®Other: DOS 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? 5. Is the computer Internet connection connected to the Internet? ^ Type of access ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e. g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): TTnirorn (only software) ~/' St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER INFORMATION MORNINGSIDE BRANCH LIBRARY Please provide the JoUowing information for each Public Access Computer. Public Access Computers 1. Processor 2. RAM ~ ®Pentium ^ 486 ^ Other: ® 16 MB ^ 32 MB ^ Other: 3. Operating System i ^ Window NT ~ Window 3.1 ^ Window 95 ^ Other: -. 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? 5• Is the computer Internet connection ~I ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection I connected to the Internet? ^ Type of access j ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): SIRS Groliers Unicorn Public Access Computers ~ i 1. Processor j ®Pentium ^ 486 ^ Other: ~ 2. RAM ~', ®16 MB ^ 32 MB ^ Other: 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 ~ Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if ves)? ~. Is the computer connected to the Internet? ^ Internet connection Type of access ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection i ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): ^ Window 3.11 SIRS Groliers Unicorn '`rr, TECHNOLOGY SURVEY FOR LIBRARIES ELIGIBLE FOR PARTIAL LIBRARY BUILDING GRANT (SPOV < 10 °Io ) St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY TECHNOLOGY SURVEY -PORT ST. LUCIE BRANCH LIBRARY Library Branch Information ~' GLI Records 180 SW PRIMA VISTA BLVD. PORT ST. LUCIE FL 34983 - 8429 (561) 871-5450 Shipping address (Enter shipping address if different from above) Plense donor use PO Bna ress s ;T rntsstrtQ. Total number of employees (FTE) 8 Branch Manager: Karen Marlin Phone: 561-871-5450 Fax: 561-871-5454 Email address: karenm@stlucieco. Qov URL for library's website: y~,~,,, s t-lucie .lib . f 1. us / psl.htm Computers Total number of computers: 10 Of the total number of computers: Number of Pentiums: p Number for Staff Use only: 4 Number of 486s: g Number for Public Access: 6 Other computer(s): -2~ nternet Connection Is the library building currently connected to the Internet? [Yes ^No Is this connection coming from the Central Library? ^Yes ©No What type of connection are you using? ®Dedicated line ^ Dial-up connection If dedicated cottttectiott: How many computers share this building's dedicated Internet connection? 2 Method used to make the connection: ~ ISDN ^Dedicated Point-to-Point ^ Frame Relay ^ ADSL ^ Cable Modem ^ Other: What is the speed of vour connection? ^ 56 Kb/s [~' 128 Kb/s ^ 256 Kb/s ^ 512 Kb/s ^ T1 ^ Other:- If you use a router, what is the brand and model? Brand: N/A Who owns the router? ^ Library ^ Internet Service Provider (ISP) ^ Other Model: N/A )nline Public Access Catalog (OPAC) )PAC Vendor: Operating System: Number of OPAC terminals: '`'ftware: ^ Unix ^ NT Does the OPAC have a web interface'? ^Yes ^No -:elease Version: ^ VMS ^ Other, please specify: Answer only if different front your centrnl librnn~ Same Questions? Call GCTA Networking Support at 1-888-289-8989, press 1 for Statewide Partnership Grant recipients, and select the Network Support option for assistance. ~rr+' 'fir/ St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER INFORMATION PORT ST. LUCIE BRANCH LIBRARY Please provide the following information for each Public Access Computer. Public Access Computers - ---- --- 1. Processor I ^ Pentium ®486 ^ Other: 2. RAM ! ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ®Other: RMR 3. Operating System ^Window NT ^Window 95 ^Window 3.11 ® Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? 5• Is the computer Internet connection ~ ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the _____ Internet? ^ Type of access ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface ', 6. Please list the three most popular app]ications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): SIRS Unicorn Public Access Computers 1. Processor ^ Pentium ®486 ^ Other: 2. RAM ~ ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ®Other: 7808K 3. Operating System ^Window NT ^Window 95 ^Window 3.11 ® Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if yesj? 5. Is the computer Internet connection ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection ' connected to the Internet? ^ Type of access ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): SIRS Unicorn 'fin '`r/~' St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER INFORMATION PORT ST. LUCIE BRANCH LIBRARY Please provide the jollowinS information jot each Public Access Computer. Public Access Computers 1. Processor ^ Pentium ®486 ^ Other: ~ 2. RAM ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ®Other: 8MB 3. Operating System i ^Window NT ^Window 95 ^Window 3.11 I ®Window 3.1 ^ Other: f ~ 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? 5• Is.the computer Internet connection ~ ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the Internet? ^ Type of access ~ ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface '~ 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's sames, word processing, etc.): y icorn (only software Public Access Computers 1. Processor ^ Pentium ®486 ^ Other: ~' 2. RAM ~ ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ®Other: 8MB 3. Operating System '. ^Window NT ^Window 95 ^Window 3.11 Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? 5. Is the computer Internet connection connected to the Internet? ^ Type of access ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): Unicorn (only software) w.r-~ St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER INFORMATION PORT ST. LUCIE BRANCH LIBRARY Please provide the jollowiny information for each Public Access Canpu~er. Public Access Computers 1. Processor j ^ Pentium ^ 486 ®Other: 286 ~ 2. RAM ^ ]6 MB ^ 32 MB ®Other: Fi40K 3. Operating System j ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 I ^ Window 3.1 ®Other: DOS ,' 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? o• Is the computer Internet connection ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the Internet? ^ Type of access ~ ^ ^ ~ Graphical Interface Text-based Interface 6. Please iist the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): Unicorn (only software) Public Access Computers 1. Processor i ^ Pentium ^ 486 ®Other: 286 3. RAM i ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB Q Other: 640K 3. Operating System , ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 Li Window 3.1 ®Other: DOS ', 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? ~. Is the computer Internet connection connected to the Internet? ^ Type of access L~ ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): Unicorn (only software) rrr.-' '~..i/ TECHNOLOGY SURVEY FOR LIBRARIES ELIGIBLE FOR PARTIAL LIBRARY BUILDING GRANT (SPOV < 10°Io) St. Lucie County Library System BRANCtHeLIBRARY TECHNOLOGY SURVEY - St. Lucie West Library This is a joint-use facility owned and L4~~ary t~ranc~i Ini~odmationiver Community College with three separate networks present . GLI Records 520 NW California Boulevard PORT ST. LUCIE FL 34986 - (561) 462-4693 Shipping address (Enter shipping address if different from above) Plense rlo nor use PO Bnx s tJ rntsstng. Total number of employees (FTE) 1 Answers based on staff and equipment provided by St. Lucie County Library System >dl~;~ia Leslie Hoyt Phone: 561-462-4693 Fax: 561-336-4169 Email address: hoytlir3@lincc.ccla.lib.fl, URLforlibrary'swebsite: www.ircc.ce.fl.us/srv/ library/slw.htm Computers Total number of computers: ~_ Number of Pentiums: 1 Number of 486s: 2 Other computer(s): 0 Of the total number of computers: Number for Staff Use only: 1 Number for Public Access: 2 Internet Connection Is the library building currently connected to the Internet? ®Yes ^No Is this connection coming from the Central Library? ^Yes ®No What type of connection are you using? nX Dedicated line ^ Dial-up connection If dedicated conrtectiott: How many computers share this building's dedicated Internet connection? Method used to make the connection: ®ISDN ^ Dedicated Point-to-Point ^ Frame Relay ^ ADSL ^ Cable Modem ^ Other: What is the speed of your connection? ^ 56 Kb/s ©128 Kb/s ^ 256 Kb/s ^ 512 Kb/s ^ T1 ^ Other: If you use a router, what is the brand and model? Brand: N/~' Model: N/A Who owns the router? ^ Library ^ Internet Service Provider (ISP) ^ Other Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC) Answer only if different from your central library Same OPAC Vendor: Operating System: Number of OPAL terminals: Software: ^ Unix ^ NT Does the OPAC have a web interface? ^Yes ^No Release Version: ^ VMS ^ Other, please specify: us Questions? Call GCTA Networking Support at 1-888-289-8989, press 1 for Statewide Partnership Grant recipients, and select the Network Support option for assistance. - ~r/ St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER INFORMATION St. Lucie West Library Please provide the,(ollowing information fnr each Public Acr•ess Computer. Public Access Computers 1. Processor ~ Pentium ^ 486 ^ Other: ~ - --- -. 2. RAM ®16 MB ^ 32 MB ^ Other: I 3. Operating System I ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 ', ^ Window 3.1 ®Other: nOS 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? 5• Is the computer Internet connection ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the ___ _ - Internet? ^ Type of access ', ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): Unicorn (only software) Public Access Computers 1. Processor ~ ^ Pentium ®486 ^ Other: _ 2. RAM ~ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ^ ether 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 ^ Window 3.1 ®Other: DOS 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? ~ 5. Is the computer Internet connection ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the --- -___ Internet? ^ Type of access ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): Unicorn (only software) St. Lucie County Library System ~~ BRANCH LIBRARY BACKGROUND INFORMATION: ZORA NEALE HURSTON BRANCH LIBRARY SECTION 1: Branch Address GLI Records Shipping address Plense donor use PO Bnx 3008 Avenue D FORT PIERCE FL 34947 - 2639 (561) 462-2154 Verify address and supply shipping address if missing. CRC'TT(1N 2: T,ihrarv Branch Information Branch Hours of Operation Monday 9 :00 am/prtf to 5 :00 wpm Tuesday q : 00 am/pm to F~ " 3 Q,~i/pm Wednesday 9:00 am/pfrt to 8:30 ~/prt, Thursday 9:00 am/pfn to 8:30 ~rh/pm Friday 9:00 am/prh to S : OO ~/prn Saturday 9:00 am/Arli to S : OO ,y~pm Sunday N/A am/pm to N/A am/pm Total number of employees (FTE) 6 Branch Manager: Sandra Gebert Phone: 561-462-2154 Fax: 561-462-2844 Email address Building square footage: sandrag@stlucieco.gov 5,200 Does the building have a meeting room? Yes _No How many meeting rooms does the building have? ~_ Please list the size (in square feet) and the capacity of each meeting room: 206 (15) ST?C'TTnN 3: Measurements of Population and Poverty for: ZORA NEALE HURSTON BRANCH LIBRARY Number of people served by this building: 51,807 Percentage of building service population: in poverty: 26.65% SECTION 4: Existing Public Access Pentium PC's at: ZORA NEALE HURSTON BRANCH LIBRARY Number of public access Pentium PC's (Pentium P133 or better and a minimum of 16 MB of memory): 2 SECTION 5: TechnicaUTraining Support at: ZORA NEALE HURSTON BRANCH LIBRARY Technical Staff (From Central) I`Tumber of staff and full-time equivalent employees (FfE) devoted to supporting technology: 4 Library staff Person responsible for installation and maintenance of GLI- funded PCs: Edward K. Werner Title: Assistant Library Director Phone :561-462-1615 Fax: 561-462-2750 Email address: ewerner@stlucieco.gov Total hours per week to be devoted to technical support: 5 Anticipated technical assistance from non-staff member Name: Chuck Satchwill Affiliation (e.g. community member, local high school student, etc.): St. Lucie County Automated Serv Phone :561-462-1759 Fax: 561-462-1443 Total hours per week to be devoted to technical support: 5 Training Staff ____ Number of staff and full-time equivalent employees (FTE) devoted to supporting training: 3 Library staff Person responsible for training: Sandra Gebert Title: Librarian II (Branch Supervisor) Phone:561-462-2154 Fax:561-462-2844 Email address: sandrag@stlucieco.gov Total hours per week to be devoted to training: 10 Anticipated training assistance from non-staff member ~' Name: Volunteer Affiliation (e.g. community member, local high school sstudent,etc.): Tri County Computer User Group Phone : 561-$78-3117 Fax: Total hours per week to be devoted to training support: 5 ~r/+' St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY TECHNICAL INFORMATION FOR GRANT IMPLEMENTATION ZORA NEALE HURSTON BRANCH LIBRARY •,~i~it~uici Total number of computers: 10 Number of Pentiums: _~_ Number of 486s: 4 Other computer(s): 1 Computers being used as network machines to access the Internet: 3 Of the total number of computers: Number for Staff Use only: --~- Number for Public Access: ~- Netw Number of computers with network cards installed: 10 Number of computers networked: -~- Coaxial used to connect network? (Y or N) -~ Length of coaxial cable (in feet): ~-- Is l OBase-T used to connect network? (Y or N} -~ Number of hubs (If lOBase-T used): -~- Number of available ports (If IOBase-T used): Is 100Base-T used in your building? (Y or N) --N- Do you have free 100Base-T pons? (Y or N) -~- Number of available pons (If 100Base-T used): ~- Using arepeater? (Y or N) N Electricity Number of computers on the same circuit: Has the electricity been checked by an electrician? How many more machines can be added within the electrical capacity of the building? online Public Access Catalog (OPAC) OPAC Vendor Si si Operating System: Number of OPAC terminals: 8 PCs Software: tTni_corn ~ Unix ~ N"C Does the OPAC have a web interface? CIYes ^No Release Version: gg - 4 ^ VMS ~ Other, please specify: site Preparation (Branch Library) T~Pe of site preparation required before grant can be implemented. (wiring, renovation, new construction, etc.): Upgrade interna~ datalines frota CAT4 to CATS . _ Questions? Call GCTA Networking Support at I-888-289-8989, press 1 for Statewide Partnership Grant recipients, and select the Network 4unnnrt ~ntinn for assistance. ~" St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTEK INFORMATION ZORA NEALE HURSTON BRANCH LIBRARY Please provide the following lr~fornuttion•for each Public Arc•ess Computer. Public Access Computers 1. Processor ', ^ Pentium ~ 486 ^ Other: 2. RAM ! ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ®Other: RMR 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^Window 95 ^Window 3.11 ®Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? ^ 5• Is the computer Internet connection ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the _~_- _ _ _ Internet? ^ Type of access ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): TroQ~le Trouble Math Microsoft Dinosaurs Animals (San Diego Zoo) Public Access Computers 1. Processor ^ Pentium ®486 ^ Other: 2. RAM ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ~ Other: 7808K 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^Window 95 ® Window 3.1 ^ Other: ^ Window 3.11 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? 5. Is the computer Internet connection connected to the ^ ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection Internet? ^ Type of access ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): Trot~Qle Trouble Math Microsoft Dinosaurs Animals (San Diego Zoo) St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER INFORMATION ZORA NEALE HURSTON BRANCH LIBRARY Please provide the jollowins injornwtion,(oreadr Public Access Computer. Public Access Computers 1. Processor ^ Pentium ©486 ^ Other: 2. RAM i ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ®Other: 8MB 3. Operating System ^Window NT ^Window 95 ^Window 3.11 ®Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? 5• Is the computer Internet connection ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection ! connected to the Internet? ^ Type of access i ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): Unicorn SIRS Groliers Public Access Computers 1. Processor I ®Pentium ^ 486 ^ Other: 2. RAM i ®16 MB ^ 32 MB ^ Other: 3. Operating System ^Window NT ^Window 9~ 0 Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? ~. Is the computer Internet connection connected to the Internet? ^ Type of access ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): ^ Window 3.11 Unicorn SIRS 'M1rrr' "~/ St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY PUBLIC ACCESS COMPUTER INFORMATION ZORA NEALE HURSTON BRANCH LIBRARY Please provide the following injonnatinn jnr each Public Access Computer. Public Access Computers 1. Processor i ® Pentium ^ 486 ^ Other. 2. RAM ®16 MB ^ 32 MB ^ Other: 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 ® Window 3.1 ^ Other: 4. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? S• Is the computer Internet connection i ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the Internet? ^ Type of access I ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): Unicorn SIRS Groliers Public Access Computers 1. Processor ^ Pentium ^ 486 ^ Other: 2. RAM f ^ 16 MB ^ 32 MB ^ Other: 3. Operating System ^ Window NT ^ Window 95 ^ Window 3.11 ^ Window 3.1 ^ Other: ~. Is the computer networked (check if yes)? ^ ~. Is the computer Internet connection ~ ^ Dedicated Line ^ Dial-up connection connected to the ~ Internet? ^ Type of access ~ ^ Graphical Interface ^ Text-based Interface 6. Please list the three most popular applications on this machine (e.g. Web browser, children's games, word processing, etc.): ~/ `rIr St. Lucie County Library System BRANCH LIBRARY INTERNET CONNECTIVITY INFORMATION FOR GRANT IMPLEMENTATION ZORA NEALE HURSTON BRANCH LIBRARY Current Internet Connection Is the library building currently connected to the Internet? ®Yes ^No Is this connection coming from the Central Library? ^Yes ®No What type of connection are you using? ®Dedicated line ^ Dial-up connection If dedicated connection: How many computers share this building's dedicated Internet connection? 3 Method used to make the connection: ®ISDN ^Dedicated Point-to-Point ^ Frame Relay ^ ADSL ^ Cable Modem ^ Other: What is the speed of your connection? ^ 56 Kb/s ®128 Kb/s ^ 256 Kb/s ^ 512 Kb/s ^ T1 ^ Other: If you use a router, what is the brand and model? grand: N/A Model: N/A Who owns the router? ^ Library ^ Internet Service Provider (ISP) ^ Other TntPTTPt rnnnPrtinn Ftanc Do you plan to connect the GLI donated equipment to the Internet? ®Yes ^No If no, please explain How do you plan to connect to the Internet? ~ Dedicated line ^ Dial-up connection Who will be your ISP? FIRN Who is your contact at the ISP? Mahmood Hag Contact phone: 850-487-7958 Contact email: mha4@popmail. f irn. edu What is your expected monthly ISP cost? None What is your expected one-time installation fee for connectivity? Waved Do you plan to build a Wide Area Network (WAN)? ^X Yes ^ No Upgrade WAN from ISDN What technology is planned for the WAN connections? ^ISDN ~ Frame Relay y ^Dedicated Point-to-Point ^ ADSL ^ Cable Modem ^Other What is your local phone company? BellSouth If you have a contact at the local phone company, please provide the following: Contact name: Robert Fredericks Contact phone: 800-433-2355 What router equipment are you planning on using (in the this location)? Router brand: Router model• Additional Comments: Questions? Call GCTA Networking Support at 1-888-289-8989, press 1 for Statewide Partnership Grant recipients, and select the Nerwnrk 4iinrx~rt nntinn fir a~cictance. ~./ .~ _ r l I ~ I ~ _ I w ~ ~ ~ ! i I ~ .=~ .. I ' i ~,` ;' ~ ', ~ ~ I I I i ~ ~', % i ~: c. :: . ~ ;. I ~ I va ~ ~ ~ ~ cs9 ~, ~. ~ "' ' ~ ~~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ I ilI I~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~~.~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ .,.., c .-~ ~' ~ O O O o o ca o 0 O O O © O.. . F. ea . i h, c.' t.-u- ~- ~ Oi ~D O~ Cd O O tf9 O v'1 O ~1 tY,_ ~?, a0 ''1 I ^, ~y ~ c~ v3 can s9 u~ ^~ ,,~, •' 0 cJ L -~ 6. i O O O O C O O O O p O O O O 'C _ ~' O~ O~ vl O ~ ~ ~ G13 69 ~ _ .. ~ ~ ~ N b9 ~ "~ 1 69 ~ ~ ^ FI ~.. ~ CV " ~ -. bD ~; ~~ I I ~ ~ -I I I F.y ~ Q ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .--1 I . _ ~ Th! ~~~~~ L: ~ L .: L?' 'C `C ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ i' p I , ~ t I ~ J LJ L -~ ~--J ~-I - F-i , LZ o c o 0 0 0 0 y r'^ ~ ,a t ,. L N ( O ~ O O O O O C O O O O O ~ ~ t~, ".d'" ~~ r~.r .. w ~ -+ O O O O O O O r y N ,~ -- V' ~ y ~ / ~. N .~ O~ ~ ~ ~ I W w ~- _ ~ E- E- F- 'r '--' F-r ~ 3. r V-. ~/ al ~ O ~ 7 ~ t O C ! ~ L T d VI u ~ L ~ ` C ~ U , ~ ~ O ~ O CC _ _ L rn .- ce t. .n ~. c c 3 0 ~ ~ - ~ . _ v U C ; ~ cd c ~ ~ V - ~ U 7 •- . O L ti ~ c ~ C C L ' _ ~ • .U "~ - a _ N ~ N G O 'G '.7 ~ U U r0 'p Y G p a , ~,.x_•. ~ r r _ ~ o ~ ~ ° ~ ~ ~ ~ O ,. ~ _ .~ ; ~I ~ of jl~ O i ~1 I ~~ I ~, I~ ~ II I~~ ~ ~ O N N~ ¢I W il, ~ ~ a o r ~ ~ w ~ ' N 4.. 0 c ~ • c v ~ • ~~ ~¢~ ~~ o a - A U ~, ~ C~ L ~ ~ lt1 ~ G T y T n ~ 'ci L ~~>w c p `C' °~ C ~ 'p G O N Q' • ~ ~ ~ ~ v _~ ~ a ~ C 0- L '` ~ ^ ~ ~-. ~ ~ `7 ~ ~ v ~ ~ ¢' ~ ~ ~ t N . ~ ~ 'D F ~ ~ ' ~~ U ~ y v L .L F u ~ ~ y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ ~ C , _ • ~ _ ~ ~ y aU ,~ O ~ _ ~ ~ c _ N ~ ^ ~ cC '~ ~ v -~ -- - ._ U ~ ti `~ •3 ,J v: ~ ~ N r bA C cd ~ ~ ~e U W G :D :.+ ~ E C C G v G . V ` r v ~ ~ c ~~ - C o . N ~ tV a" t V c r ~ ~ N U ~ Z ~ G G L ~ ~ U ~ ~ v. V% ~ N C ~ W •r ~ V. ~ •° ~ r = ~ ~ c L ~ ~ G d C R ' ti _ V C ~ ~ r G ~ ~. C C o. s U ti o`n r ~ ` L = ~ • c ~ ~ U V. ~ ~' ` c u V Y t"" ^ G .a ~ ~ ~ ~^ ~ c o C ~ C F F ~ L (/' L CU - ~ ~ C r ~ ~ ~ C L L L ~ V L" O x ~ 'D 'D v O "~ L CC CC Mr~-I, V ~i U .~ CC C"' i+ H U ~~.4,'//J F+M C CC L Q ~.R r;:~T.~ II ~II ~I G '~ ~ 'i ~ i ~ ~ ~" i~ _. ~ i ~ ~ I I ~ ;. _ ! i ~~ ~ ._ ~ z ~: ~~ ,. ~ U ~ ~ ~ ~ I J I I t ~ a - - ^~, '~ ~,: ~ a i ~4 f r~~`:" ~ I ~ ~ - ~ `" ' O o, O O O O Q O c ~ F ~' =-° ~ O O ~~ O w O 'i o O o ~n O o ~' " ° ~ ~ _ i .: u . . G O O O O O O O •~ ~ O ~ O ~ n -. ~• ~ N N _ 5A 6A fP ~ 69 69 69 _~` ~. - ~' C - ~ . ~~ I ~ i ! -~ ilI ~~ . ~~ ~ II I ~--i ^ C .7i ~ a LJ LE ' u ~J l J + a ~,a' ' _ } "~-' O O O O O O O -1' N ~ N N h ~C -- .~~ ~ O O O O O O O `"~ ~; C~ O C O O O O O ~ ~~ ~~. Z O O O C C O N O t N 1~ ~ V ~+ V' s;G.: h:: ~ r - w. ;, c L ~ V O L L ~ y - o ~ /i C ~ U f/1 .. ~. o O i-. h ~ O CC 'Y vi ~ r O i- -Q ~ o ~ 3 o l N i i F ~ h.•l ' C ~ v ~ .- °U ce v ~ u c F 'U G y CU OU ~ O i. ~ O ~ _ _ U 1 __ . C' ~ . 4. L Z . . ~ ~' ~' ~ F - ~ .~ ~ U ~ '~ ~ ^ ~ = C 'C ' ~ G ~ O ' . V ~ _.. ~ Q ~ o IU N Q~ ~ i N .. y i a~ I U i y I di W I J cd ~ ~. ' ~ ~ ~v a~ a~ ~~ ~, ; .. ~ ~, w 0 ~_ s ~ ~ ~ . a~ ~ ~ X _ ~ ~ ~.. ~ o T y T t .D ~. > w c .. C aG., ~ ~ ~ ~ . o h o' ~ ~ ~ n. G. X O ~ a~ c,.. y a~ = U ~,,, L ca ~ W a y ~ v_, 'a i > O ~ .a_' a. °~ a~i h .~.. t ti N v 6J ~ ~ bhp ` V_ Z O '~ ~ ~""' C .p ~ "' ^ ~ . ..-. _ ~ b!1 t C h . . ai cc 'p U T ~ y L v; ti ~ ~ Z ~J = C R' U_ CS y L G '~ [3 .G C C. ~ ~ c c .c ._ ~ ~_ u ~n v U ~ vi ~;, U ~ ` c" .N. h v, rGi `^ .. ~ v, ~ r ~ c t c ~ C ~ v C ~ ._ ~ G o. ~ U u ~. ~• ~ U ~ C G 'N v: ~ _ .Y J ~ i ~ ~ c ~ ~ r ~ L ~ ~ 1 .l+ C C '- ` C ~ t ~ ~ ti Z ~i 7_ Projected Project Expenses Section 1 Expenses Covered through Gates Library Initiative Grant Funds ',rlr Bud et' Cate _ Amount Hardware/Peripherals Total Request for all Libraries in your System (attach grant request tables for each library building) 33 , 594.00 Gates Library Initiative SUBTOTAL: 33, 594.00 Expenses Covered by the Library System Cate. o , _ Amount Staff (% of time X salary for six months) -Total of the next 3 lines below x Portion of Staff that is Administrative Support y Portion of Staff that is Technical Support Portion of Staff that is Training Coordination Support Construction/remodeling expenses (estimated) Materials (fliers, fact sheets, supplies, etc.) Furniture Ongoing telecommunication costs (include first year of operation) Non-grant provided hardware Software not projected to be included in grant Other (please provide explanation) St. Lucie Co. Automated Service netwgrk connection SUBTOTAL• *Pre-discount through E-Rate for T1 upgrade both sites 10 211.00 '~ 2,323.00 ~ 1,772.00 "~ 6 116.00 :0.00 1 7 0 0 0.00 * 12 576.00* 0.00 3,340.00 43,393.00 Gates Library Initiative Subtotal 3; 5 (Insert GLI Subtotal from above) Expected Project TOTAL 76 , 987.00 (not including Microsoft software value): Projected Ongoing Annual Expenses Section 2 (Please use the Budgeting Issues section of the Grant Making Guidelines Booklet to complete this section) Ex ease Annual Cost Staff l o , 211.00 Hardware Replacement/Repair (assume 20% of initial total cost per 5,876.00 Annual on oin telecommunications eases 15 , 516.00 Other on oin eases: a er, toner, etc. 1, 000.00 TOTAL ro~ected on oin annual eases 32, 603.00 **Pre-discount through E-Rate for continued T1 frame-relay connections. a r +~„~, ti~ Checklist for Local Library Grant Application ^ Contact Information is complete for 1 - 4; 5 is completed if different from Grant administrative contact. ^ Grant Applicant Certification is signed by all three representatives and the original signatures are attached. ^ Project Descriptions are complete (at least 1 page has been submitted on each of the 3 topics). ^ Background Information, Library Technical Information, Library Public Access Computer Information, and Internet Connectivity Pales are completed for the central library and each branch library in your system. ^ Grant Request Tables are filled out for the central library and each branch library in your system. ^ Projected Project Expenses Table is complete for your library system. ^ Two copies of your latest Technology Plan is included if applicable. ^ One original and two copies of all materials are included. ~- . ~~~. ~' '~, ' AGENDA REQUEST T.~ ~" ~ ~. TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PERSOIUIUFi BRISK ITEM NO. C-11 DATE: 5/25/99 REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT:(x) /" BRESENTED BY,t / Patricia A. Clute Personnel Coordinator st BJECT: Revised Equipment Request and Budget Amendment Request for Personnel/Risk. BACKGROUND: On April 27, 1999, the Board of County Commissioners approved a request to purchase equipment to implement a professional training program. The request did not include software in the amount of $405. PREVIOUS ACTION: Yes RE~MMENDATION: Staff recommends the approval of the revised equipment request #EQ 99-208 and #EQ 99-210 and revised Budget Amendment BA 99-119, as per attached. APPROVED O DENIED °~`' - O OTHER: g s Anderson County Administrator Review and Ap removals ^ County Attorney: ^ Management and Budget: ^ Purchasing: ^ Originating Dept:.: p~rcnnneuRiskl ^ Other: ^ Other: ^ Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: >~ CONTINGENCY BALANCE: THIS AMENDMENT: REMAINING BALANCE: BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FG~iI REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: OMB/PERSONNEL PREPARED DATE: May 18, 1999 AGENDA DATE: May 25, 1999 ;, ., ..,r i " s i TO: 001-1330-564000-100 Equipment FROM: 001-1330-534000-1901 Training-Contracted Services REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: Revision for BA99-115---Software was not included for the DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: DOCUMENT # S INPUT BY: new laptop and PC on the previous budget amendment. 99-119 $405 $405 OMB:QP/GENERAUFORMS/AMENDMEN eff. 10/01/94 m z -~ m fJ m cpo co N O iw c z -~ z c 3 v m 0 w w 0 rn 0 0 0 0 0 ~„ `'„ c m 1J - ' v ~ c ~ i ~ ~, ~ 3 n '= 3 i ~ z '`` c .. z » * ~ ~ * » O ~ F.~' ~``` N cyD ~ m czD ~ ~ ~ y ~ ~' ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ x o a ~ y w O ° ° to ~ ~ m ~ ° -' ? a ~ ~ n m m y m v ~ a .°~ _ v v ' o ~ ~ `~ a ~ O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~~ o~ ~ ,: y m 3 ~ > m b~ ~ ~ - o a m ~ ~~ c >:< a as ~. ~ ~- o ~ o' m o .a m v °- ~' ~ ~ a z ~ ' , m , ~ m _ cn - =~ .o r ~; ~ :~ n ~• rn n '~ 3 m ' ~ ` ~. ~~ ~ z N N Z Z ~ ~ ~ ~ 3 m 3 v m z v m v I~ O N -~ m~ pc cm -o m0 ~ Z m~ CO mD ~~ v o° ~o ~' ~n O DZ r~ rnp D3 ~3 ono N O `° m N rn ~r - ~ c A C < m C ~ - "'~ ~ ~ m 3 ~ : N p D ~ 3 n ~ ' -a m ~ ; ? 3 ~ ~ . 3 ~ rn z o ' : o - i m ? m ~ ~ m rn m co ~ o m ~ v~ ~ v~ ~ ~ ~ ~' vi ~ ~ o °~ ~ o h ~ o ~ 0 , ~ , ~ o r o y~ ~ `~ ` ` ~ ~~ ~ ' µ m m ~ ~ Q ~ a a2i o ~ ~ Da ~ v ~ ~ a _ a,a ~ ~~ ~ ~ y ~~ ~ ~, o o~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ :. F , i rr ~ 0 ° - ' a ,~ a ~~ ~ ~ a ~ a . ~ o M ~~'. ~ ~ ~# a ~ a ~ ~ . m :; ~ m C o ~' ' ' z .~~ < 3 .-., < z m ~ ~ v 3 , cD ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~µ N ' v ~` - ' m ~~ 3 ~ m ,z o ~ ' ~ '' ~ a t> , ~~ ~ 00 ~ v -ti ; ' ~ _ ; < ~ ~ ~ F . cn . . O o O p a v m ~ o o m 0 0 m~ A C cm -~ mo zc ~z m~ CO rnn ~ 70 v 00 ~~ ~^ O Dz r~ rnp a3 ~~ ~ ~_ °D O `O m N ~.+r AGENDA REQUEST '~•+~' ITEM NO. C-12 DATE: May 25, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: OMB PRESENTED BY: Harvey M. Lincoln SUBJECT: Budget Resolution appropriating $22,806 in additional fun 99 allocated by the Florida Department of Community Affairs for the FY Community Services Block Grant. BACKGROUND: On October 20, 1998 the Board accepted the FY99 allocation in the amount of $99,172. On March 23, 1999 the Board approved a modification of the agreement allowing additional funding in the amount of $22,806. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: 001120-6420-331691-600 N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of the County Commissioners approve Budget Resolution 99-113 appropriating $22,806 in additional funds for FY99 Community Services Block Grant. COM ~ SION ACTION: [ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ~u ~ Anderson Administrator Coordination/Sionatures County Attorney: XX ~ 'n ~"'~ Management 8~ Budget: ~ Purchasing: Originating Dept: Public Works: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX G:\budget\wp\agenda's\agenda99\525HumanSrva Grantwpd ~~~2. RESOLUTION NO. 99-113 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners budget for St. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have become available for the FY99 Community Services Block Grant allocated to the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners from the Florida Department of Community Affairs. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (dl, Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 25th day of May, 1999, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 1998-99, and the County's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 001120-6420-331691-600 001120-6420-581065-600 001120-6420-5 8107 5-600 001120-6420-534000-600 Dept. Of Health and Human Services Martin County Okeechobee County Other Contractual Services After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX Commissioner Cliff Bames XXX Commissioner John D. Bruhn XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 25TH DAY OF MAY , 1999. ATTEST: 522,806 $12,825 $4,751 55,230 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA CHAIRMAN BY: APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY G:\budge[\wp\agenda's\agenda99~525HumanSrva Graatwpd CONTRACT NO: 44sYf3.9C-12-00-01-025 ~. ~ MOOIFICI *f NO: ~QQl :> ,~ • ~trdt`4nI)IFICATION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN Il t)RInA [)IiPARTMENT OF COIwttJN(TY AFFA(lt9 I AND S.iin~ Lncie t'ogpt~)}oud Of CotaN ~~l~tna~ 1 hr a~rccn,cm between the [)cpartment of Community Affair and ('unnni~~i~mcrs, bc.uing the abme contract number is modified by mutual agreement of d1e parties u follows: I. ('lau•;c (I 5) (c) /1tt;ichmcnt~ is hereby sounded t0 read: (c) phis Agrl:cntent has the following attaehmants: A. Dudget and Scope of Worst li. Program Statutes and lta;tr(atioct C. Property Manaetatteat trod PtoctxestsssK I). Reports f:. Federal Lobbying hd-ibk(oaa 1~. Justification of Advsoce tayaneet '~ (~. Copyright, Patent and ltabemark 11. Statement of Assurances I. Special Conditions J. Certiflcatton iletardlag Debansast, 8trrpaasloa, wti Ot1ar Responsibility Malten - lrleoary Covered Traasaellaae '-. Clause (16)(a) Funding/Considcration is hereby amended to read: "This is a Gust-reimbursement agreement. The Reeipient dull be rclmburxd for coats incurred in ttse satisfactory perforntance of work hereunder In an smount not to exeeed 5121.97t• wbject to the availability of cash." This amount includes: , I S9n,172 Current FFY 1998.99 contract slloeation. '-. + 5578 ~ Final federal fiords available for FFY 1991-91. 3. * S2?.?28 Carry•ovcr funds (unexpended FY 1997-93 CSl!(D fVrrlds) ~. Attachment Il(4)(b}, end (c), Match Reauiremen~ is hereby amended to read: (h) The Recipient shall provide ss matching funds for services carder this agreement the followhtt amounts: S_ 2440 CASI( S 21956 M-KIND (cl ' r List the source(s) from which the cash and in-kind match w111 be obtained: Cuh: X144() _ Board of County Cosunlesionera In•Kind: ;21956 - Board of County Commiseionera and Non Profit Agencies A« achmcnt A: Attachment A: Wuric Plan Changes Dudget Changes ~tachment ): Cerifieation Regarding Debarment, Suspension and Other Responsibility Matters All other provisions of the contract not in conflict with this moditicatlon reenah In full force and effrxt. RF. IPIF.N1 .STATE OTlrIAAIDA D)'~ Paula A. t.PU1a Chairman BOCC Rosa M.11{orpa, C-N( (Type Name and Title) ~ Bureau of Ce~Aa~ky ArlsiMaa nate:_` 04/01/99 j ~)~~, ~ouivey ~'~-- 9-6~ooB3s ' t i ~] Federal Identification Number ' ~ / ajf~ ~ 1, APFROI'~[l ''" •i~ra ~ ~:'~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1`• ~~ ,•i~..~ ' ANO costa," r.,.~~: ~ '~ ' 9 ~, A4o.CaUNTY AT~i~OfiNCY „~",,p~t?}~7'' 1