Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 06-01-99 '-' ..., www.stlucieco.gov John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA June 1, 1999 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held May 25, 1999. 2. GENERAl, PUBLIC COMMENT 3. CONSENT AGENDA 4. PUBLIC WORKS Art in Public Places- Consider staff recommendation to direct the Cultural Affairs Council to work with the Treasure Coast Builders Association to develop a plan to fund the Art in Public Places program. .. 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Billboard Art Design and New Ads- Consider staff recommendation to approve the art work design for the Landfill billboards and accompanying ads. NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing ul)on request. "-' ..., CONSENT AGENDA .June I, 1999 1. W ARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 35. 2. LIBRARY Software Maintenance Contract- Consider staff recommendation to approve a sole source contract for SIRSI for maintenance support and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract. 3. PERMISSION TO ADVERTISEIRECOMMENDED FOR A NIGHT MEETING A. County Attorney-Consider staff request for permission to advertise a public hearing on the abandonment of the old alignment of Becker Road on July 6,1999. B. Community Development- Consider staff request for permission to advertise the following public hearings on June 15, 1999: -Broadmoor Alzheimer's and Memory Impairment Center, for a change in zoning from the RM-ll (Residential, Multiple-family-ll du/acre) zoning district to the I (Institutional) zoning district for the expansion of an adult congregate living facility. Location: 200 Dixieland Drive -James and Shirley Cagle, for a change in zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single-family - 3 du/acre) zoning district to the I (Institutional) zoning district for the expansion of an existing adult congregate living facility. Location: 5615 Oleander Boulevard -Donald and Louise Doran, for a change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-family - 2 du/acre) zoning district to the CO (Commercial, Office) zoning district to allow for the highest and best use of the property. Location: east side of South 25th street, approximately 500 feet south of Midway Road -Paul J. Driscoll, for a change in zoning from the IX (Industrial, Extraction) zoning district to the AG-2.5 (Agricultural- 1 du/2.5 acres) zoning district to utilize the property for agricultural uses. Location: southeast corner of the intersection of Orange Avenue and Pulitzer Road -Wayne Skinner, for a change in zoning from the AG-2.5 (Agricultural - 1 du/2.5 acres) zoning district to the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) zoning district to develop a convenience store, retail store specializing in feed, seed, agricultural accessories and retail western wear. (Location: southeast corner of the intersection of Okeechobee Road and Eleven Mile Road) -We D. White, for a change in future land use designation from RS (Residential Suburban) to COM (Commercial) to allow for the best use of the property. Location: 7701 Indrio Road -We D. White, for a change in zoning from the AG-l (Agricultural- 1 du/acre) and CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) zoning districts to the CG (Commercial, General) zoning district to allow for the best use of the property. Location: 7701 Indrio Road "-' ....., CONSENT AGENDA JUNE 1, 1999 PAGE TWO 4. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE A. Bridge Replacement- Consider staff recommendation to approve Work Authorization No.2 for construction contract management with Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari & Hellstrom, Inc. for engineering services related to the Orange A venue over C-57 bridge replacement in the amount of $9,000 and authorize signature by the Chairman. B. S. 25th Street- Consider staff recommendation to award Bid No. 99-55 for the construction contract for stormwater ponds B, D, E and F to Ranger Construction in the amount of $333,948., establish the project budget and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. 5. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Budget Resolution 99-117- Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget resolution establishing the budget for the Emergency Medical Services grant for the Fire District. 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY Lease Termination- Consider staff recommendation to terminate the lease agreement with Don Wayne Clark and grant permission to advertise Parcel 44 located at 3904 N. Kings Highway. 7. LEISURE SERVICES Parks Swap- Consider staff recommendation to swap maintenance responsibilities for Martin Luther King Jr./Dreamland Park and Indian River Memorial Veterans Park with the City of Fort Pierce and direct the County Attorney to prepare the appropriate interlocal agreement. '-' ....., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADDITIONS AGENDA .JUNE 1, 1999 CONSENT AGENDA MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET A.I Resolution No. 99-119- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution receiving $149,763 for the scoreboard at the Sports Complex and approve the expenditure of these funds. COMMUNITY DEVEI,OPMENT A.2 Small Business Workshop- Consider staff recommendation to authorize the purchase of advertising in area newspapers for this workshop not to exceed $2,000. <_.~" ~ 'wi BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: May 25,1999 Tape: 1-2 Convened: 9:03 a.m. Adjourned: 10:55 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Paula A. Lewis, John D. Bruhn, Cliff Barnes, Doug Coward, Frannie Hutchinson Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator; Phil Freeland, Asst. County Administrator; Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Jack Doughney, Leisure Services Director; Ray Wazny, Public Works Director; Dennis Murphy, Asst. Community Development Director; Leo Cordeiro, Solid Waste Manager; Don West, County Engineer; Mike Bowers, Road and Bridge Manager; Jim David, Mosquito Control Director; Ch~lie Bicht, Purchasing Manager, Don Cole, Acquisitions Manager; Beth Ryder, Human Services Manager, Deputy Williams; A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES (1-029) It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the minutes of the meeting held May 18,1999; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS Ms. Clara Iglauer, area resident, addressed the Board regarding parking space at the library. The County Administrator advised Ms. Iglauer that staff has contacted the postmaster and they have decided they will review the situation every sixty (60) days. Ms. Iglauer also addressed the proposed MSTU for the unincorporated area. The Chairman advised Ms. Iglauer that the Board has not determined as yet whether or not anything will be in fact levied. There will be a public hearing held on June 22, 1999. CONSENT AGENDA (1-060) C-9-A - FCT Grant Application- Consider staff recommendation to authorize staff to submit the Florida Communities Trust application for the Ancient Oaks Preserves project on behalf of the County Commission. ,~ Com. Coward requested that before this application is filled out, staff should verify with the Economys property owner, that this new boundary the county has drawn, is acceptable to him/her. .-; , '....,,; ~ '.' '-~ Com. Bruhn questioned funding from the general fund in the amount of $408,000 which is for improvement costs and $134,000 from recreation impact fees, totaling $522,00.0 as the county's share. . '~ ~ I . . :4 ~':C:lr~ ' '" ..-.... .,- - '-' 'wi ~_!:.i-,,~:,r..,';.'.~': ':.:;:. Com. Bruhn requested a separate vote on this issue. Com. Hutchinson advised the Board of various grants available after the fact. Com. Coward complimented Ms. Susan r<;i}me~ fi:orn.the Library for pursuing additional grant money. ~ .' ~ ..,-., '.. C-9.A- It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by CotÌl. Coward, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Bruhn, Aye's: Branes, Coward, Hutchinson, Lewis; motion carried by a vot~J?(4"to 1. BALANCE OF CONSENT AGENDA It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the balance of the Consent Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. Warrant List The Board approved Warrant List No. 34 2. PURCHASING A. Bid No. 99-48- The Board approved rejecting all bids for the purchase of so.d and the re-sprigging of Open Space Football field.' B. Contract Extension- The Board approved the assignment and extension of the contract for solid waste collection and disposal services with Jennings Environmental and Waste Management and authorized the Chairman to sign. C. Bid No.99-50 The Board approved awarding the bid for the annual road resurfacing contract to Ranger Construction in the not to exceed amount of $900,000 and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. 3. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE A. Bid No. 99-38- The Board approved awarding the bid for installation of park pavilions to to Adnan Investment and RCD Commercial Construction and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. B. Stormwater Management- The Board approved the grant application to the South Florida Water Management District to print and mail a stormwater management brochure. 4. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Indrio North Savannas Project- The Board approved Amendment II to the FCT Grant Agreement and authorized the Chairman to sign the Amendment. ..I B. Contract Amendment- The Board approved an amendment to the contract with the St. Lucie Mural Society for the Bob Gladwin Baseball Complex and authorized the Chainnan to sign the amendment. . . ''''1 ,1 ~" ' . . ~'~i .~ " ~ ...., C. Children's Environmental Learning Mriseùriì- the Board-approved the contract with Paul Jacquin and Sons, Inc., and authorized the Chairman to sign. D. Bluefield" Ranch- The Board approved giving conceptual approval to the Agreement with Florida Communities Trust and authorized the Chairman to sign the Agreement. E. Blind Creek Lease Agreement- The Board approved the proposed lease agreement with the South Florida Water Management District for Blind Creek, Indian River Lagoon Tracts 100-00 through 100-011. 5. PUBLIC WORKS A. Engineering- The Board approved the plat and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Pod 7B at The Reserve and authorized the Chairman to execute the documents subject to final review and approval by the County Attorney. B. Engineering- The Board approved theplat and Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Pod 20A at The Reserve and authorized the Chairman to execute the documents subject to final review and approval by the County Attorney. 6. HUMAN SERVICES Resolution No. 99-110- The Board approved the resolution amending the Local Housing Assistance Plan for fiscal years 98-99, 99-00, 00-01 to include a Disaster MitigationlRecovery Contingency Strategy. 7. RISK MANAGEMENT Safety Handbook- The Board approved the St. Lucie County Safety Handbook. 8. ADMINISTRATION Harbour Pointe- The Board approved funding the extension of A venue M and transfer $30,000 from General Fund Contingency. 9. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT B. FCT Grant Application - The Board approved authorizing staff to submit the Florida Communities Trust application for the North Fork of the St. Lucie River Greenway Addition on behalf of the County Commission. 10. LIBRARY Gates Library Initiative Grant- The Board approved authorizing staff to submit a grant request and authorized the Chair to sign at the meeting. 11. PERSONNEL Budget Amendment No. 99-1l9/Equipment Request Nos. 99-208,210- The Board approved the amendment and the equipment 12. MANAGEMENTIBUDGET Resolution No. 99-113- The Board approved the budget resolution appropriating $22,806 in additional funds for FY 99 Community Services BloGk Grant. . . :-'. ~ . . ".~ --1 t,,,,,;.,,,..,.,~,·.·'''''' ."" " -~~~-:'~':;:;Þ;'::';R .~:>~,,:-:;-:,..;-~~ ...; REGULAR AGENDA 4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (1-0468) Transportation Enhancement Applications - For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to approve and support the proposed 1999 DOT's Transportation Enhancement Applications for North AlA landscaping, Spanish Lakes Blvd., Bike Path an Airoso/St. James Blvd., landscaping. The Assistant Community Development Director addressed the Board regarding additional costs which the county may incur in the future. Com. Coward asked if the county could work with the Sheriffs department in order to utilize trustees from thejail for the projects. The County Administrator advised the Board that this could possibly be done and he would explore it. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 5. PUBLIC WORKS (1-0741) Solid Waste- This item was re-agendaed from March 9, 1999 Board meeting. Consider staff recommendation to change the tipping fees for construction and demolition debris from $30 to $21 at the Glades Road Landfill. The Public Works Director addressed the Board on this issue. Com. Coward questioned several figures provided by CDM in their analysis. Mr. Dan Anderson, representing CDM addressed Com. Coward's questions. Mr. Larry Adams, also from CDM eluded to the assumptions they had to make in order to do a cost of services analysis. Mr. Anderson advised the Board that they could not give a recommendation today, due to the fact they do not know what private enterprise will do with their rates, so, it is not knO\Vll how precise the 27,000 tons figure really is at this time. Com. Bruhn stated his concern with the $21 figure was, that Okeechobee was charging $18 and with the prices being so close, our landfill would be utilized by the contractors rather than traveling the distance and incur the additional costs. Com. Hutchinson stated she was having a problem with this item due to the fact she felt the county has not decided whether or not it is going to get into the recycling business. Without that commitment she could not decide, and stated the Board needed to make a decision as to whether or not to purchase the equipment and go into the business. Com. Barnes stated he felt our rates were artificially high. Com. Coward stated he would prefer to leave the rates as they stand until he is convinced that they need to be changed otherwise. ~ Com. Lewis stated she felt they would not know unless they changed the rates. They would only continue to project the figures. . . ~~ .... (,-.--- I .....-.~-..~ '-' .." Com. Bruhn stated he felt we should not stay at the present rate aÎ1d possibly try the $25.40 or $26.00 per ton and see what happens. Com. Coward reminded the Board the $25.42 rate does not include the additional $ 1.27 and stated he would be willing to move to a compromised position if the $1.27 is added in order to purchase the equipment.'¡ ~..!' The representative from CDM advised Com. Coward that the $25.42 figure included the, additional $3.00 per ton for additional staff. The Public Works Director explained table B as presented by CDM and how they arrived at the $21.00 figure. The Board continued to discuss the various options. Com. Lewis advised the Board that the main idea was to revisit the figures in 6 months. Com. Hutchinson referenced a letter from Timothy Hunt and reiterated her position. Com. Bruhn stated he felt staff was telling the Board that the county was going into the recycling business. ' Com. Hutchinson stated she would consider the $26.69 fee and bring it up for consideration once again in 6 months. Com. Lewis stated the fee was not projecting an increase and she did not feel comfortable with the figure. Com. Barnes stated he felt the same way. Com. Coward stated he concurred with Com. Hutchinson and felt this was a good first step until other steps are made regarding any purchases of recÿèling equipment. He stated he feel be more comfortable making that initial step. The Board continued to discuss the recycling issue. Mr. Danny Kriser, East Coast Recycling, addressed the Board on this issue and stated his opposition to the change in fees. Mr. Kriser questioned the analysis report provided by CDM. Com. Coward commented on the density issue and the life expectancy of the cell, closure costs, etc.. He also stated that he felt these issues have not been adequately addressed. Com. Hutchinson requested trying a different rate for 6 months. Com. Lewis concurred and stated she felt the Board should take some type of action and revisit the issue when sound facts can be provided. Mr. Terry McNamara, South Florida Recycling, addressed the Board regarding his office not receiving notification of when these items would be brought before the Board. He stated the figures are arbitrary and are being provided by those who do not have experience in the recycling field of C and D. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Hutchinson to change the tipping fees for construction and demolition debris from $30.00 to $24.QO effective June 1, 1999; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Coward; Aye's: Barnes, Hutchinson, Bruhn, Lewis; motion carried by a vote of 4 to 1. ".,.,. '.'-..- ',. - -- . .._-o--.,.~~___.. ,~,~.~:~¡;.--:.\~.,~ç '- ...." ADDITIONS A-I. COUNTY ATTOR.J.~EY (2-0280) Ordinance No. 99-211Local Option Motor Fuel Tax- Consider staff request to permission to advertise a public hearing n the ordinance on June 15, 1999 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. Com. Coward requested the Board follow through with his recommendation which was made at the Strategic Planning Session. At that time, Com. Coward suggested that if the Board deems it necessary to increase the gas tax, the Board take into consideration allocating a portion of the tax for alternative modes of transportation. He stated he would then be more inclined to agree with the increase. He requested specific language be set in place which would makes sure in the future the allocated portion would be utilized for transit and bike paths. The County Administrator advised the Board that the 3 cents increase is needed for some repairs of our infrastructure, i.e. roads and bridges. These are immediate needs facing the county at this time, however, he does agree that in the future, some of tax money should be allocated for transportation purposes. Com. Coward expressed his concerns with the present figures of fatalities and does not want the money strictly utilized for infrastructure. Com. Bruhn stated he was not sure he would agree with restricting a portion of the tax to bike paths or alternate methods oftransportation when it could be done with impact fees. Com. Coward stated he would prefer to see one cent of the gas tax allocated for alternative modes oftransportation and then reallocate impact fees back to roads. , . It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn to approve staff s request to advertise the public hearing; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. A-2- Resolution No. 99-114/Public Transportation Municipal Service Taxing Unit- Consider staffs request for permission to advertise a public hearing on the resolution on June 22, 1999 at 9:00 a.m. or soon thereafter as possible. Com. Coward expressed his concern with the language at the end of the resolution. The County Attorney advised the Board the language could be changed to read, " and other essential transportation services". The Board concurred with the change. Com. Bruhn stated he was having a difficult time with the 3 cent gas tax and also, with the possible MSTUfor the unincorporated area. He stated he felt he was not prepared to consider this action at this time. Com. Coward reiterated what was discussed at the Strategic Planning Session. A comment was made where the Board was advised that if rural areas continue to urbanize, their tax rate needs to change accordingly. He stated, " the Board needs to look at this and if they are fearful of raising taxes through this process in the unincorporated county, then they also need to be committed to not provide the added services that are being requested by the citizens." ~ " It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward to approve the request to advertise the public hearing on Resolution No. 99-114 ; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Bruhn; Aye's: Hutchinson, Coward, Barnes, Lewis; motion carried by a vote of 4 to 1. '" '·i -.:..... ' ~'"1 ·~·,~·it:..n: . " '..-!. "-, , ' ."" .\¡ (.... ~. .. 'T~ " .,,,,~ '~¡¡..: - -- ,---------.- \.pt' ....,/ .... .'~'... ._- BOARD COMMENTS Com. Coward requested staff recommendations and input from the Board as to where and how to utilize the $45,000 received from Walgreens. .\"':'" Com. Barnes stated he would like to see the money utilized for Ancient Oak site, however, they will not know for several months if they will move forward. .,.;i·..... . Com. Lewis advised everyone that it was "WIRELESS SAFETY WEEK" and asked everyone to please be cautious as to how they utilize their cell phones. There being no further business to be brought befOre the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 10:55 a.m. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court ~ ,/ ... "". .." AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. -A- DATE: June 1, 1999 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS - ADMIN 4117 L~ SUBJECT: Art in Public Places BACKGROUND: Two workshops have been conducted to discuss an Art in Public Places program. The Board directed staff to agenda this in the first week in June and to provide funding alternatives. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: Two Workshops were held March 12, 1999 and April 30, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board direct the Cultural Affairs work with the TCBA to develop a plan to fund the Art in Public Places program. COMMISSION ACTION: [~PPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Granted permission to advertise the public hearing to be held July 6. Coordination/Sianatures [ ]Mgt. & Budget [ ]Co. Eng [ ]Purchasing [ ]County Attorney [x]Originating Dept. Public Works []Other [ ]Finance (check for copy only, if applicable) , r '-" ..., Lf MEMORANDUM PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: /1 ¿/ Ray Wazny, Public Works Director '//{<-,~ , ' SUBJECT: Art in Public Places DATE: May 26, 1999 ******************************************************************* Attached is a Memorandum from David Ginns, Transportation Planning Coordinator, which provides a comparison of Art in Public Places programs for several communities. Mr. Ginns suggests using a percentage of construction funds to achieve a public arts program. He also recommends that the Cultural Affairs Council coordinate with the Treasure Coast Builders Association (TCBA) in implementing the Arts in Public Places Program. Gail Kavanaugh, Executive Vice-President, indicated that the TCBA would be happy to participate with the Cultural Affairs Council. Staff recommends the Board direct the Cultural Affairs Council to work with the TCBA to develop a plan to fund the Art in Public Places program. RLW/sm cc: St. Lucie County Administrator - t '-" 'wi MEMORANDUM COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning Division To: Raymond L. Wazny, Public Works Director From: ~~ David R. Ginns, Transportation Planning Coordinator, St. Lucie MPO .;""< Date: May 19, 1999 Subject: Art in Public Places Attached please fmd a comparison table of Art in Public Places programs in various jurisdictions. This table indicates that the funding source for each of the four jurisdictions does not rely upon transportation impact fees. Rather, a dedicated percentage of construction funds for public and/or private buildings or a required purchase of artwork is the method utilized in the four jurisdictions to achieve a public arts program. It would be my recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners does not use transportation impact fees to develop an Art in Public Places program for St. Lucie County. The use of transportation impact fees for public arts purchases does not appear to meet the rational nexus test. I would recommend alternatively that the County review the Martin County Art in Public Places program for applicability to the Commissioners' objectives. This will allow the Commission to utilize a program with which such organizations as the Treasure Coast Builders Association (TCBA) may have some familiarity. The TCBA and other interested parties should be invited to develop the St. Lucie County Art in Public Places program under the direction of the Cultural Affairs Council. The County may also wish to contact the Project for Public Spaces/Art in Public Places program for guideance. The contact information for PPS is as follows: Cynthia Abramson Nikitin Project for Public Spaces, Inc. 153 Waverly Place, 4th Floor New York, NY, 10014 Tel.: (212) 620-5660 Fax: (212) 620-3821 Thank you for the opportunity to present information on this issue. DRG:drg Atttachment \PUBLlCART.599 '-" 'wi ART IN PUBLIC PLACES - COMPARISON TABLE Prepared by David R. Ginns, Transportation Planning Coordinator, May 19, 1999 Jurisdiction Name of Funding Project Selection Project Types ProgramlYear Source Process/Staffing Established City of Art in Public Developer Fees - Art in Public Sculptures and Oxnard, Places/1985 1 % of comm., indo Places Tile Murals California or mixed-use Committee/City buildings. administrator Miami-Dade Art in Public County Ordinance Citizens' Trust Installations in County Places/1973 - 1 .5% of County appointed by libraries and construction funds BCC. government for artworks Professional buildings and Advisory educational Committee programming provides recommendations to Trust for acquisitions and selections/County staff Martin Art in Public Art in Public Public Arts Paintings and County Places/1997 Places Fund Advisory Board sculptures (County recommends ordinance) projects to BCC 1 % of cost /County staff Use (excluding first of RFP process to $5000) of each select individual public facility. Cap projects. of $100,000 Public Art exclusive of Advisory Board donated art. Master Plan BCC can assign guides process. additional moneys Private or private developers are donations may be encouraged to made to the Fund. participate in program./County Staff City of Brea, Art in Public Art sculpture Art in Public Art Sculptures. California Places/1975 purchase required Places Advisory Guidelines for all new Committee/City provided by the residential, Planning Dept City. commercial, and industrial projects over $500,000. Allocation formula based upon building valuation. \PUBLlCART.CT.599 - '-" -...,I ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES PUBLIC ART ADVISORY BOARD MASTER PLAN rõl rs Pc R n ".; reO [;' I J,~ I ~~ 'f ,: ': I> 1 lOr" -_:_--~:_--.:~-"~ ' n I . ' "'" ., '/ ,.. . \; ¡ ¡'. -;--:'?CJ J 51 L Ci~_'" -- .--. -- ~ .~.-J . '. ,.!'·'.1ENT . ,,,f ,,\( r'l '----- Approved February 16, 1999 Martin County Growth Management Department Public Art Master Plan -~ ~f '-rtI ARTS IN PUBLIC PLACES PUBLIC ART ADVISORY BOARD MASTER PLAN Table of Contents Table of Contents 1. Introduction A. Goals of the Program B. Definitions 1 1 1 II. Role of the Public Arts Board 2 III. Arts in Public Places Fund A. Eligible Projects B. Use of Funds 3 4 5 IV. Program Administration A. General Procedures B. Specific Project Procedures C. Selection Procedures D. Selection Criteria for Arts Works E. Project Implementation F. Artists' Responsibilities G. Ownership and Maintenance 6 6 8 8 9 9 10 10 V. Loan/Donations 10 IV. Private Sector Development of Art in Public Places 11 Appendix: Ordinance 518 Public Art Master Plan - - '-" 'wi 1. Introduction Martin County adopted the Arts in Public Places Ordinance on June 24, 1997. The Public Arts Advisory Board is the entity charged with pro- moting art in public spaces. This Master Plan lays out the procedure by which Martin County will develop art in public places. A. Goals of the Program. The mission of Art in Public Places Program is to enhance the quality of the visual environment in the Martin County com- munity, both natural and constructed; and in so doing: a. To promote the spiritual, intellectual and aesthetic enrichment of the community through public art; b. To select a diversity of public art for Martin County, Florida which have aesthetic and technical merit and are appropriate in context to the location; c. To select artists who are professionally and technically compe- tent; d. To disperse public art throughout Martin County, Florida in such a manner that it is visible and accessible to the greatest number of people. B. Definitions. The terms listed below have the following definitions, in accordance with Martin County Ordinance 518. a. Architectural enhancement" is the architectural embellishment of a building, the placement of works of art in the interior or ex- terior spaces of the building, or special landscape treatments such as parks, plazas or atriums. Architectural enhancement may be an integral part of the building, situated within or out- side the buUding, may be located in or near government facili- ties which have already been constructed, or may be located in other public places where numbers of people may experience them. Public Art Master Plan 1 - ., - '-' ...,,; b. "Public Art Advisory Board" is the Board created by Ordinance 518. c. "Public Art Master Plan" is a manual of criteria for the selec- tion of sites and architectural enhancement for public capital facilities to be developed by the Public Art Advisory Board. This manual will also provide for a comprehensive program for Art in Public Places which shall include the display of loaned art in appropriate public buildings. This manual is to be ap- proved by the Board of County Commissioners before its utili- zation by the Public Art Advisory Board. d. "Public capital facility" is any capital improvement paid for wholly or in part by Martin County or paid for with monies granted to Martin County by other governmental agencies; lim- ited to any project to construct or remodel a building, regional parks in excess of 50 acres which have not been purchased for passive recreational use, parking facility or any portion thereof within the County limits of Martin County, Florida. e. "Public places" are County owned parks and buildings with high visibility and/or heavy pedestrian traffic that are open to the public. f. "Special landscape treatment" is landscaping that goes beyond the requirements of Martin County Code of Laws Sections 23- 49, et seq. ("Martin County Landscape Ordinance") in order to create a park-like setting or plaza. g. ''Works of art" are tangible objects produced according to aes- thetic principles, including paintings, sculpture, engravings, carvings, frescos, mobiles, murals, collages, mosaics, statues, bas-reliefs, tapestries, photographs and drawings. II. Role of the Public Arts Advisory Board The Public Art Advisory Board was created pursuant to Ordinance No. 518 as a body of individuals appointed by the Board of County Commis- sioners. The Arts Board is responsible for recommending the commis- sions of new works of art, the acquisition of existing works of art, the Public Art Master Plan 2 --- .. - - ~ ."'-tI selection of artists to work as members of design teams, and the review of loaned and or donated works of art. The Public Art Advisory Board shall review all eligible public capital facilities, and for each eligible public capital facility: 1) recommend the development of a Public Art project for the specific site, or 2) the use of the funds for another site, or 3) the reversion of the one percent of cost allocation to the Art in Public Places Fund. The Public Art Advisory Board is comprised of nine (9) members. Four members are representative of one (1) or more of the following clas- sifications, architect or interior designer, landscape architect or land use planner, professional in the field of art, or art or architectural his- torian. In addition, one member is a nominee of the County's desig- nated arts agency, the Martin County Council for the Arts. The remain- ing members shall be citizens with knowledge of and appreciation for the visual arts. The Board has the duty and responsibility to generate a Public Art Mas- ter Plan. The Public Art Advisory Board shall develop written guide- lines and procedures to govern the manner and method of selection of proposed sites, works of art, architectural enhancement and special landscape treatment; and the process by which the Public Art Advisory Board recommendations shall be made to the Board of County Commis- sioners and by which the Board of County Commissioners shall approve acquisitions. These written guidelines shall comprise the Master Plan. The Master Plan shall be reviewed by County staff. Mter consideration of staff comments, the Public Arts Advisory Board shall forward the Master Plan to the Martin County Commission for their approval. III. Art in Public Places Fund. The County has established a fund designated as the "Art in Public Places Fund," in accordance with Ordinance 518. All funds set aside for each eligible public capital facility project, together with such other funds as the Board Qf County Commissioners shall appropriate for works of art and funds donated by the general public for works of art, shall be deposited into this fund. Interest accrued to the fund shall be allocated in accordance with the provisions of ordinance 518 and the Public Arts Master Plan. Public Art Master Plan 3 - ... - - \..I """ These funds shall be expended by the Board of County Commissioners for public capital facility projects as prescribed by the guidelines. Any funds not expended by the end of any fiscal year shall be carried over to the next fiscal year. Any funds carried over five (5) years and still unex- pended at the expiration of such period, shall be transferred to the Gen- eral Fund for general art purposes only; provided that funds derived from revenue or general obligation bond issues or from utility revenues or other special purpose funds or funds dedicated pursuant to the terms of a bond or other debt obligation resolution shall revert to the bond, fund or project from which appropriated at the expiration of said five year period. A. Eligible Projects All estimates for the construction and/or renovation of public fa- cilities and all requests for appropriations for such eligible public capital facility projects shall include an amount for Art in Public Places, equal to one percent (1 %) of the total estimated cost of each public capital facility. The one percent amount shall be cal- culated on the total cost of the construction, excluding the first $5,000.00. This one-percent-of cost is to be spent on architectural enhancement of the public capital facility from the budget of which the one percent is drawn except if the project falls under the exclusions which follows: Exclusions The requirement that one percent of the public capital facility's construction budget shall be encumbered shall only apply if such an expenditure is legally permissible for that project and under the specific project funding sources. If the source of funding or other appropriate law with respect to any particular project pre- cludes art as an object of expenditure of funds, the amount of funds so restricted shall be excluded from the aforesaid calcula- tion. Cap The cost of Art encumbered from eligible public capital facility project budgets shall not exceed $100,000, exclusive of donated Public Art Master Plan 4 - . , '-' ....., art, per building. The $100,000 cap is not intended to limit total art allocation but only to limit the amount that can be allocated from each individual public facility. B. Use of Funds The one percent of the eligible cost is to be spent on architectural enhancement of the public capital facility from the budget of which the one percent is drawn; including any costs specified in subsection IV A 2 . 1. For Public Art Fund Administration costs, insurance costs or for repair and maintenance of any works or art acquired under this article; or 2. To supplement other funds set aside for the acquisition of works of art for other public works projects or to place works of art in, on, or near Martin County facilities which have already been constructed. Provided that funds set aside from any bond issue or any special purpose funds or funds dedicated pursuant to the terms of a bond or other debt obligation resolution which are not used for the public works project for which they were set aside shall revert to the bond fund or project from which they were set aside; or 3. When funds have accrued from a specific public capital facility project which do not lend themselves to the visual arts or for which there is no major public benefit, the Public Art Advisory Board shall, in accordance with the Public Art Master Plan, recommend the use of those funds for architectural enhance- ments for other sites to the Board of County Commissioners for approval; or funds may be retained for maintenance or conser- vation of existing projects. 4. The location of architectural enhancement paid for out of project funds at a site other than the specific project site shall require a prior finding by the Board of County Commissioners that the location of the architectural enhancement at the origi- nal project site is inappropriate for that particular project, that it serves a public purpose to locate such art objects or Public Art Master Plan 5 - -- - '--' ~ improvements elsewhere, and that it is an appropriate use of those particular funds. IV. Program Administration A. General Procedures 1. Each Department of County Government responsible for the management of an eligible project will ensure inclusion of one percent of the eligible cost in the public capital facility project budget for the development of works of art, architec- tural enhancement and special landscape treatment for the project in accordance with Ordinance 518. The Administra- tive Services Department, during its Budget review, will en- sure the inclusion of such amounts for every qualifying project. 2. Each Department of County government responsible for the management of an eligible project shall ensure that Ordi- nance 518 is referenced in the Request for Proposals or other appropriate documents and that the requirements ofOrdi- nance 518 are discussed with all architectural/engineering firms that have been ranked for consideration for the project design work pursuant to the Selection procedures set forth by the County. All contracts for architectural design or reno- vation of County facilities shall contain a reference to Ordi- nance 518; and shall include the concepts found in IVA 5. If specific services are required to support the Arts in Public Places Program, the services will be funded by the Art in Public Places Fund. 3. Prior to the initial stages of project development, the De- partment managing the specific project shall inform the Public Arts Advisory Board of the project, the budget for public art, and the timeframe of the project. The Depart- ment managing the project shall include, within the scope of services of the architect or other design professional, a meet- ing with the Public Arts Advisory Board. Public Art Master Plan 6 .'--' ....." 4. The Public Arts Advisory Committee shall add up to three representatives as provided in Section IVB.2 and 3. for spe- cific project discussions to develop recommendations regard- ing the type and placement of art to be acquired for the spe- cific project and the procedures to be followed for the acquisi- tion of the work. 5. Early in the design of a project, the architect or other design professional retained for that project shall coordinate with the Public Art Advisory Board, the selected artist and the County Project Manager for the applicable project to develop a plan for adding art works, architectural enhancements or special landscape treatments to the projects. 6. The staff of each public capital facility or public place that will be the location of public art shall be consulted by the Public Art Advisory Board about safety issues related to ar- chitectural enhancement. The public facility architect or other design professional and the County Engineer shall also be consulted by the Public Art Advisory Board about such safety issues. 7. The architect or other design professional for a specific County project may advise the Public Arts Board àuring the selection process as it relates to the project, but shall not be a voting member of the Board. 8. Once the Public Arts Advisory Board has studied the specific project needs, the Public Art Advisory Board shall recom- mend to the Board of County Commissioners those works of art, architectural enhancements or special landscape treat- ments that it deems appropriate to the project in accordance with the Public Art Master Plan. In no case shall the Public Art Advisory Board take such time to render its findings as to delay or hinder the design or construction of the project. 9. The Board of County Commissioners shall, in its discretion, accept or reject the recommendations of the Public Art Advi- sory Board. If such recommendations are rejected; the Board of County Commissioners may request the Public Arts Public Art Master Plan 7 '\..f """ Advisory Board promptly to submit alternative recom- mendations. B. Specific Project Procedures 1. The Public Arts Advisory Board may designate a member as the liaison for each specific project. 2. Two (2) community representatives from the area surround- ing the proposed installation shall be appointed by Board of County Commissioners for each specific project, to provide input on the architectural character of the project's neighbor- hood, but they shall not be voting members of the Public Arts Advisory Board. 3. One County employee whose job tasks include custody of art in the specific project shall be appointed by the County Ad- ministrator for that project, to provide input on safety and also to provide input on the architectural character and in- terior design of the specific project, but they shall not be vot- ing members of the Public Arts Advisory Board. 4. The architect or other design professional for a specific County project may be a member for that specific project, but shall not be a voting member of the Public Arts Advisory Board. C. Selection Procedures 1. All Art in Public Places projects are open to professional art- ists. In order to ensure competition, the Board of County Commissioners shall advertise Requests for Proposals (RFPs). The Public Arts Advisory Board reviews all propos- als and recommends to the Martin County Commission the type of work to be commissioned or bought. 2. The project is described and widely advertised through a Re- quests for Proposals (RFPs) setting out in the RFP the loca- tions of the architectural enhancement, the criteria by which such architectural enhancements will be evaluated, Public Art Master Plan 8 , I '-" '....I deadlines for submission, and cost range. Notification of the RFP shall be to lists of artists maintained by the Martin County Council for the Arts or mailing lists obtained from the State Art in Public Places Program, or other artist regis- tries. D. Selection Criteria for Sites and Public Art In the selection process, the Public Art Advisory Board shall consider the following criteria: a. Architectural enhancements shall be located in areas where residents and visitors live, work or congregate and shall be highly visible and accessible; b. The appropriateness of the work to the site, permanence of the work relative to environmental conditions, maintenance requirements and costs, and the enduring nature of the artis- tic statement; c. The sensitivity of the work to the aesthetic and cultural tradi- tions and the history of Martin County, Florida and also to the surrounding neighborhood's character; d. The artist's biography and resume, examples of existing works, technical competency, similarity to existing works of art and the following basics: form, texture, color, clarity, line and medium. E. Project Implementation Following County Commission approval of the selection process for each specific project, the staff liaison shall prepare the ap- propriate selection materials for dissemination. After the Board approves the specific work to be acquired, the staff liaison, with the assistance of the County Legal Department, prepares and ne- gotiates the contract between the artist and the County. The project manager for the specific project shall ensure that the artist is fully integrated into the design and construction phases of the project, as needed. Public Art Master Plan 9 ...... --..... ...... " ~ ""'" Renovation work done to existing buildings shall be coordinated with the Public Arts Advisory Board to ensure that appropriate work is selected for the building. F. Artists' responsibilities The artist will be responsible for the art work until installation of the art work is complete and the final payment is approved by the Public Arts Advisory Board. The artist shall supply a complete description of the work of art which would include composition materials. The artist shall recommend a maintenance plan to be followed to preserve the work of art. G. Ownership and Maintenance Unless otherwise provided, ownership of all works of art and ar- chitectural enhancements acquired by Martin County under this Program shall be vested in Martin County, including copyrights, patents and other reproduction rights. The Board of County Com- missioners shall be responsible for managing the reproduction rights of each acquisition with advice and counsel from the Public Art Advisory Board. Custody, supervision, maintenance, and preservation of the works of art is the charge of the Board of County Commissioners and shall be carried out by qualified art professionals with appropriate collaboration with the County's designated arts agency or its appointee. V. Loans/Donations Architectural enhancements donated or loaned to the County shall be accepted for installation only if reviewed by the Public Art Advisory Board and the Public Arts Advisory Board detennines such enhance- ments are consistent with the Public Art Master Plan. This provision does not apply to architectural enhancements donated or loaned to the County before the effective date of Ordinance 518. This provision shall not preclude existing facility arrangements for the use of loaned materi- als for rotating shows. The custodians of architectural enhancements in public capital facilities shall assume responsibility to determine the location of donated or Public Art Master Plan 10 \wi "-tII loaned architectural enhancements should such a change be required after the art works original placement. VI. Private Sector Development of Art in Public Places Private development is not bound by the provisions of Ordinance 518. However, the Public Arts Advisory Board encourages the provision of art in the public spaces of private development. The Public Arts Advi- sory Board shall be available to meet with any individual or entity seek- ing to provide or promote arts in public places. Appendix: Ordinance 518 Public Art Master Plan 11 .....--..... 4..L.:'l\r. cr lo.' '~1.1I ;..~;;;:. , ~~RT:N :':.. = _ - ~- en U.I.:. ~ """ o , 2 4 2 9 5 3 97 JUL - 3 PM 2: 06 BEFORE THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS R€C£/~ . tD ..../ ,1 , ~ ORDINANCE NUMBER 518 ! - -, ~ .~:~~ .' " '-, --,~ í'i :"':"F"'fi7M~ MARTIN COUNI'Y, FLORIDA ART IN PUBUC PLACES ORDINANCE AN ORDINANCE OF MARTIN COUNTY, FLORIDA RELATING Tû ART IN PUBLIC PLACES; PROVIDING FOR GOALS; PROVIDING FOR ESTABLISHMENT OF THE PUBLIC ART ADVI- SORY BOARD; PROVIDING FOR ART IN PUBLIC PLACES TRUST FUND; PROVIDING FOR SE- LECTION PROCEEDINGS; PROVIDING FOR OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE; PROVIDING A SEVERABll.JTY CLAUSE; AND PROVIDING AN IMMEDIATE EFFECTIVE DATE. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Martin County, Florida has determined that art must be an integral part of Martin County, and WHEREAS, this Board wishes to include the acquisition of art in all new public facility construction and msjor renovations, and it is the intent of this Board to provide for a reasonable and systematic pro- gram for acquisition, commission, installation and maintenance of art in public places; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF MARTIN COUNTY. FLORIDA, THAT: Part One: Chapter 7114, Code of Laws and Ordinances of Martin County, Florida. entitled ..Art in Public Places," is created to read as follows: Article 1. Goals. The mission of Art in Public Places is to enhance the quality of the visual environment in the Martin County community, both natural and constructed; and in so doing: a. To promote the spiritual, intellectual and aesthetic enrichment of the community through public art; b. To select a diversity of public art for Martin County, Florida; Co d. e. To disperse public art throughout Martin County, Florida in such a manner that i t\ 1 ~~ accessible to the greatest number of people. Article 2. Definitions. For the purpose of this Article, the terms listed below shall have the following definitions: a. "Architectural enhancement" is the arclútectural embellishment of a building, the placement of works of art in the interior or exterior spaces of the building, or special landscape treatments such Idatalgmdldiri.mialart.ordiDance.reviøed.aw lof7 O~ 8:.;1 2 4 7 PG I 7 I 5 ..... ..... - -- -.... ~ .....,¡ as parks, plazas or atriums. Arclútectural enhancement may be an integral part of the building. situated within or outside the building. may be located in or near government facilities which have already been constructed, or may be located in other public places where numbers of people may experience them. b. "Public Art Advisory Board" is the Board created in this Article. c. "Public Art Master Plan" is a manual of criteria for the selection of sites and architectural enhancement for public capital fac:i1ities to be developed by the Public Art Advisory Board. This manual will also provide for a comprehensive program for Art in Public Places wlùch shall include the display of loaned art in appropriate public buildings. This manual is to be approved by the Board of County Commissioners before its utilization by the Public Art Advisory Board. d. "Public capital facility" is any capital improvement paid for wholly or in part by Martin County or paid for with monies granted to Martin County by other governmental agencies; linùted to any project to construct or remodel a building, regional parks in excess of 60 acres wlùch have not been purchased for passive recreational use, parking facility or any portion thereof within the County limits of Martin County, Florida. e. "Public places" are County owned parks and buildings with lúgh visibility and/or heavy pedes- trian traffic that are open to the public. f. "Spedallandscape treatment" is landscaping that goes beyond the requirements of Martin County Code of Laws Sections 23-49, et seq. ("Martin County Landscape Ordinance") in order to create a park-like setting or plaza. g. 'Works of art" are tangible objects produced according to aesthetic principles, including paint- ings, sculpture, engravings, carvings, frescos, mobiles, murals, collages, mosaics, statues, bas- reliefs, tapestries, photographs and drawings. Article S. Public Art Advisory Board, Creation, Composition, Responsibility a. A Public Art Advisory Board under the direction of the County's designated arts agency is hereby created as a body of individuals appointed by the Board of County Commissioners, wlùch shall have the duty and responsibility to generate a Public Art Master Plan for review and approval by the Local Planning Agency and County Commission and to make recommendations on specific public art projects, including the selection of works of specific public art projects, including the selection of works of art, special landscape treatments and architectural enhancements. b. The Public Art Advisory Board shall be comprised of nine (9) members as follows: 1. Four (4) members shall be representative of one (1) or more of the following classifications: a. arclútect or interior designer IdAtalgmdldirl.mialart.ordinanœ.reviøed..aw 20f7 ~n 81( i 2 L} 7 PG I 7 I 6 - - -......... ~- -- '-" '-" b. -. c.. d. 2. 3. 4. landscape architect or land use planner professional in the field of art art or architectural historian One (1) member shall be nominated by the County's designated arts agency. '!be reT"Rining members shall be citizens with knowledge of and appreciation for the visual arts. The architect or other design professional for a specific County project may advise the Board dur- ing the selection process as it relates to the project, but shall not be a voting member of the Board. 6. Two (2) community representatives from the area surrounding the proposed installation may be appointed for that specific project. to provide input on the architectural character of the project's neighborhood, but they shall not be voting members of the Board. 6. One County employee whose job tasks include custody of art in a public capital facility in which.. and/or near which.. architectural enhancement is proposed may be appointed for that project. to provide input on safety and also to provide input on the architectural character and interior design of the specific project. but they shall not be voting members of the Board. Article 4. Architectural Enhancement Rules Except as provided herein. all estimates for the construction and/or renovation of public facilities and all requests for appropriations for such projects shall include an amount for Art in Public Places, which amount represents an amount for architectural enhancementr and for restoration and main- tenance of works of art, equal to one percent (1 %) of the total estimated cost of each public capital facility. '!be one percent amount shall be calculated on the total cost of the construction. excluding the first $6.000.00. This one-perœnt-of cost is to be spent on architectural enhancement ofthe pub- lic capital facility from the budget of which the one percent is drawn except if the project falls under the exclusions listed below; a. The requirement that one percent of the public capital facility's construction budget shall be encumbered shall only apply if such an expenditure is legally pennissible for that project and under the specific prqject funding sourœs. If the source of funding or other appropriate law with respect to any particular project precludes art as an object of expenditure of funds. the amount of funds so re- stricted shall be excluded from the aforesaid calculation. b. '!be location of architectural enhancement paid for out of project funds at a site other than the specific project site shall require a prior finding by the Board of County Commissioners that the IdAtaJgmdJdiri.mialart.ordiDance.revaed.aw S of7 OR BK I 2 4 7 PG I 7 I ì '-' "wII- particular project, that it serves a public purpose to locate such art objects or improvements else- where. and that it is an appropriate use of those particular funds. c. The cost of art encumbered from public facility budgets shall not exceed $100,000, exclusive of donated art. per building. The $100,000 cap is not intended to limit total art allocation but only to limit the amount that can be allocated from each individual public facility. d. Architectural enhancements donated or loaned to the County shall be accepted for installa- tion only if the Public Art Advisory Board determines such enhancements are consistent with the Public Art Master Plan. 'Ibis provision does not apply to architectural enhancements donated or loaned to the County before the effective date of this ordinance. e. The custodians of arclútectural enhancements in public capital facilities shall detennine the location of donated or loaned architectural enhancements. Article 6. Procedures. a. For construction of public capital facilities financed by Martin County, the following proce- dure shall be complied with: (1) Early in the design of a project, the arehitect or other design professional retained for that project shall work with the Public Art Advisory Board and such County employ- ees as the Board or County Commissioners may designate to develop a site plan for adding art works, arclùtectural enhancements or speciallandscape treatments to the projects. (2) '!be staff of each public capital facility or public place shall be consulted by the Public Art Advisory Board about safety issues related to architectural enhancement. The public facility designer and the County Engineer shall also be consulted by the Public Art Advisory Board about such safety issues. (3) The Public Art Advisory Board shall recommend to the Board of County Conunission- ers those architectural enhancements that it deems appropriate to the project in ac- cordance with the Public Art Master Plan. In no case shall the Public Art Advisory Board take such time to render its findings as to delay or lúnder the design or con- stroction of the project. (4) The Board of County Conunissioners shall, in its discretion, accept or reject the rec- ommendations of the Public Art Advisory Board. If such recommendations are re- jected; ~ .Board of County Commissioners may request the Public Arts Advisory Board to submit alternative recommendations. (5) ldAtalgmdldiri.miølart.ordinance.revieed.aw 40f7 "~~'I' ') _'. _7 PI': I 7 .:., ~.; t '- r U 8 .. - '-" '...,I Requests for Proposals (RFPs), setting out in such RFPs the locations of the architec- tural enhancement, the criteria by wroch such architectural enhancements will be evaluated, deadlines for submission, and cost range. b. When funds have aCC1Ued from construction and public works projects which do not lend themselves to the visual arts or for wroch there is no major public benefit, the Public Art Advisory Board shall, in accordance with the Public Art Master Plan select architectural enhancements for other sites and recommend them to the Board of County Conunission- ers for approval; or funds may be retained for maintenance or conservation of existing projects under this article. Article 6. Art in Public Places Fìmd. a. There is hereby established a fund designated as the..Art in Public Places Fund." All funds set aside pursuant to t1ús article for each public works project, the construction or remodel- ing of which has not commenced as of the Effective Date of this ordinance, together with such other funds as the Boarè of County Commissioners shall appropriate for works of art and funds donated by the ger:eral public for works of art shall be deposited into this fund. These funds shall be expenó." ~ DY the Board of County Commissioners for public capital facil- ity projects as prescribed by : :"ie guidelines. Any funds not expended by the end of any fiscal year shall be carried over to 'he next ñsca1 year. Any funds carried over five (6) years and still unexpended at the expiration of such period, shall be transferred to the General Fund for general art purposes only; provided that funds derived from revenue or general obligation bond issues or from utility revenues or other special purpose funds or funds dedicated pursu- ant to the tenns of a bond or other debt obligation resolution shall revert to the oond, fund or project from which appropriated at the expiration of said five year period. b. To the extent that the total funds set aside for each public works project are not used for the acquisition of works of art for such project, the remainder may be used for: 1. Public Art Fìmd Administration costs, insurance costs or for repair and mainte- nance of any works or art àcquired under this article; or 2. To supplement other funds set aside for the acquisition of works of art for other public works projects or to place works of art in. on, or near Aartin County facili- ties wroch have already been constructed. Provided that fu: ,:5 set aside from any bo~d issue or a::'~,- special purpose funds or funds dedie:-. pursuant to the terms of a bond or ; . -:: debt obligation resolution wroch 2.:. .:lot used for the IdBtalgmdldiri.mialart.ordinance.røviøed.aw 50f7 "1 -. R :{ I 2 7 P,. I 7 . 9 :'.\ oJ. 4 b I -- .... ~ ....., public works project for which they were set aside shall revert to the bond fund or project from which they were set aside. Article 7. Selection Criteria for Sites and Public Art In the selection process, the Public Art Advisol)' Board under the direction of the County's desig- nated arts agency, shall consider the following criteria: a. Architectural enhancements shall be located in areas where residents and visitors live, work or congregate and shall be higlùy visible and accessible. b. . The Public Art Advisory Board shall take into account appropriateness to the site, pennanence of the work relative to environmental conditions, maintenance requirements and costs, and the en- during nature of the artistic statement. c. The selection should show sensitivity to the aesthetic and cultural traditions and the history of Martin County, Florida and also to the surrounding neighborhood's character. d. In each selection, the Public Art Advisol)' Board shall consider the artist's biography and re- sume, examples of existing works, technical competency, similarity to existing works of art and the following basics: form, texture, color, clarity, line and medium. e. Subject to the Board of County Commissioners approval, the Public Art AdvisoIY Board shall de- velop written guidelines and procedures to govern the manner and method of selection of pro- posed sites, works of art, architectural enhancement and special landscape treatment; and the process by which the recommendations shall be made to the Board of County Conunissioners and which the Board of County Commissioners shall approve acquisitions. These written guidelines shall comprise the Master Plan. Article 8. Ownership and Maintenance Unless otherwise provided, ownership of all works of art and architectural enhancements acquired by Martin County under this Section shall be vested in Martin County, including copyrights, patents and other reproduction rights. The Board of County Commissioners shall be responsible for managing the reproduction rights of each acquisition with advice and counsel from the Public Art AdvisoIY Board. Custody, supervision, maintenance, and preservation of the works of art is the charge of the Board of County Commissioners and shall be carried out by qualified art professionals with appropriate collabora- tion with the County's designated arts agency or its appointee. Pari Two: Severability. The provisions of this Ordinance are severable and it is the intention to confer the whole or any part of the powers herein provided for. H any of the provisions of this Ordi- nance shall be held unconstitutio~ by any Court of competent jurisdiction, the decision of such court shall not affect or impair any remaining provisions of this Ordinance. It is hereby declared to be the ldatalgmdldiri.mialart.ordinanœ.revised.aw 60r7 ,- -..' 2· -; I 7 ,.. .1.1 ;:;ì f .., ?G t. 0 - '-" '" legislative intent that this Qrdi.naDœ would have been adopted had such unconstitutional provision not been included therein. Part Three: Conflicting Provisions. Special acts of the Florida Legislature applicable only to unin· corporated areas of Martin County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in con- flict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. Part Four: Filing with Department of State. The clerk be and hereby is directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code, Department of State, 401 South Monroe Street, Elliott Building, Tallahassee. Florida 32399-0250. Part Five: Penalty Provision. A violation of this ordinsmt'.e shall be punishable as a IIÙSde- meanor, according to applicable provisions of law; however, in addition to or in lieu of such prosecution, Martin County shall have the power to enforce the provisions of this ordinance through the standard code enforcement process or by action in civil court. Knowingly furnislùng false information to the county administrator on any matter relating to this administration of this ordinance shall constitute a violation thereof. Pari Six: Codification. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated into the MartiD County Code of Laws and Ordinances, except that parts 1 through S and parts 6 through 11 shall not r>e codified. The word "ordinance" may be changed to "article," "section," or other word, and the sections of this ordi- nance may be renumbered or relettered. Part Seven: Effective Date. 'Ibis ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Office of Secretary of State. PASSED AND DULY ADDPTED THIS 24TH DAY OF JUNE. 1997. ~ . ~ER, CLERK F.¡JiE CIRCUIT COURT . ~J'''ioI'''''''P'' r: ,I,.. ' '. ' '. Qr ..". Ff' " ., \) .", ';'¡~ 'L, ''u!t''-,.... . ,.... ,~ ~ 'Þ'P,~. ::;.ð" ~~: " /" 0 iJ~.:.- .jr.,.... . . :. ~ . 0 ~ ~. ~~ .":: "oc'-=' .<:..~~' 'é"~~~~.~ . i·' "-~ --~~ -" . ,.:. At) . " Z . ::.,~ .- .'''.''';-- - / .:, .- 'P' '. . :y". C)-' - " .J.,.' .,~ ·j,j¡ú;....('\;:~".' ' . .~,';)~ \ If'!-',. .. . BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS Oi ':' ~ ~ I: ~ MARTIN COUNTY. FLORIDA ¡; ~ Ic i ~ ~ ~ ;::-'E 8 :1: Z 0 .~ ani:§~ k ~ 1 '-'>Š8~ª~~ ~a~ .~ ~~I~ > L WILCO ' ,,,,,":= 0." ~ . t:'\ ~-; .., ~ ~ CHAIRMAN ... ' -4 P 00( n:1:""-4 ~"'~ ~ ,,~OU>-4 ,. 5 ~:t c z~,., r> ~ "" ATTEST: 7 of7 -¡ì ,....,. '). I P'" 7 ,.. ._;¡ 0j\ to ..; I U ¿ I lcà.talgmdldiri.mialut.ordin' :'jAW .. - '-' .....". wn "...'."J ¡ C\.~' l.._.__. ;c\T ;~ L Art in Public Places Committee 305 West Third Street Oxnard, CA 93030 (R05) 3R5-7R57 Dear Artist, Thank you for your inquiry about our public art program. A copy of City Council Resolution No. 9X 13, which establishes policies and procedures for the art in public places program is included with this letter. The city does not nonnally contract for pubic art and therefore it does not send out notices for these projects. We maintain a file of public artists. If you would like to be included. please semi a resume, 35 mm slides of your work in a clear-plastic sleeve (no more than 12). and a magazine or newspaper review of your work. The city is not responsible for the return of slides submitted. This file will be made available to developers of commercial. industrial and mixed-use project<; over tOO.OOO square feet, who are required to include public art in their projects. The main thrust of the program is towards outside. monumental artwork and sculpture that can endure the element'). This would preclude paintings. fiber art or less-sturdy metal or fabricated sculpture. Your art on file will be made available 10 developers when public art projects are anticipated. We wish you_well in your career and hope you will stop by the city's Carnegie Art Museum. tt> view its exhibit.;; and permanent collection when you are next in Oxnard. Sincerely. Deanna D. Walsh Public Art Coordinator ~~M~ Suzanne Bellah ( Director. Carnegie Museum G:\COMMDEV\J )E^ NN ^ \ART.Ll'R .. '-" "'" . ~ . CITY COUNCIL 01" 'l'HE CITY 01" OXNARD RESOLUTION NO. 9813 ~':t C~J ï~,~F ~~-:. }"¡l ~ i; :;:: ,. 1...·_ A RESOLU'rION OF THE CITY' COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF OXNARD ESTABLISHING THE ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PROGRAM AND ADOPTING GUIDELINES FOR THE CITY OF OXNARD· J1}C:!. 1 :·Ù '\0,,'_:'; h, ì\ - I WHEREAS an Art i.n PublicPlacea proqram (OproqraJII°) will foster a succe~sful.partner:ship between the private and public sectors, which vill benefit the architectural and cultural envirOnment of the citizens of the City of Oxnard (·City"); and WHEREAS'; expandinq public exposure and experience throughout the broad spectrIDI of the arts would be in the best. interests of the City; and WHEREAS, in ha.z::aony with. this qoal, the policy of the City Council is to require that visual· art be included in future major comøercial, industrial, and/or mixed-use projects within the City; and WHEREAS, the nature and chaxm of the City will be enhanced. by the PrOqraa and .the citizens of the City Jll4Y enjoy works of art for the public welfare. NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Oxnard hereby resolves a~ follows: I. A developer of a major private constrUction project within the City shall participate in the Program as a conditicln to '. the qrantinq of any d±scretionary pønù.t by the Planninq COIIIIIÚ.ssion or City Council. II. A DlSjor private construction project shall JlØan a cOl'lllllercial, industrial and/or mixed-use project of 100,000 square feet or more of habitable baildinq floor·space. III. The nature of :the participation of a developer of a major private construction project in the program shall be determined vithin the reasonable discretion of the.planninq COIIIIÚ.ssion· ·:in conjunction with the consideration of the developer's.: application for a discretionary permit. 'IV. A. An Arts In Public Places Coauaittee. is hereby established and.ctl:rected to review, approve, approve subject to IIIOditications, or disapprove,·· all artWOrk required by .the proqraa:This COJIIIIÚttee shall consist of the followinq members: 1. A member of the CUltural and Fine Arts Commission (.··Commission 0) to be selected by that Commission. 2. A representative of the artistic community to be selected by that Commission. 3. A member of the Planning Commission to be selected by the Planninq Commission. 4. An architec.t or engineer from the private sector . to be appointed by the Mayor with the approval of the City Council. 5. The Community Development Director or a represen- tative. '. :~l f: ~- i71 ...' I ~ ~ .' 'REsaLUTIOH NO. 9813 PAGE 2 6. 'l'he . Parks and Recreation Director or a represen- tative. - v. 7. The Cultural Arts Supervisor of the City. The Committee shall apply the following General Guidelines to determine the acceptability of a proposed artwork: A. Any exterior artwork shall be reasonably visible to the public. The artwork shall be located in an area specifically approved by City staff on the site plan. e. The developer shall instal.l and plan the artWOrk to enhance the artwOrk and allow for unobstructed viewinq froa AS aany anqles as possible. . . B. D. The artwork proposal shall include a co.plete site plan including landscaping, lighting, and other appropriate accessories to coapleaent and protect the artwork. E. The artwork proposal shall consider the strUctural and surface soundness, inherent resistance to theft, vandAlisa, and weathering, and waautenance and repair costs· of the artwork. .. F. The artwork shall. not include any siqnaqe or logos. G. The artwork shall be desiqned to a scale that is harmonious to the size and style of adjacent structures. H. The artwork shall be identified by a standardized plaque, according to Committee specifications, with a suggested placement of the plaque to be included in any. model. and/or illustrations. I. The desiqn of the artwork shall be an inteqral part of the architecture of the project and shall be in addition to pl:anned andlor required landscaping. VI. The CoIaDlittee shall apply the following Specific Criteria to determine the acceptability of a proposed artwork: A. All sculpture shall be pe:caanent and affixed to the property. B. All murals·,. vith the exception of mosaics, shall be mounted upon durable panels for ease of possible relocation. C. All artworks shall œ:"ccmposed of .aterials which ensure longevity, especially' when artist·'s colors are used. .. D. The developer shall agree that any interior artwork will be properly lighted for viewing. E. The developer shall agree .that any exterior artwork shall be lighted for viewinq after dark. F. The developer shall ;'agree thàt the artist shall have the first right to repair any damaqe to the artwork at developer's cost. G. Upon completion and installation of the artwork, the developer shall require the artist to donate a drawing, plan, sketch or model of the final artwork to the City of Oxnard Art Collection. -~ '-'" """'" RESÓLUTIOH NO. 9813 PAGE 3 K. The developer shall agree to require the ~ist to to the Public Art ArChive a final detailed budget, of Dlðterials used to construct the artWOrk, and maintenance instructions. give list "- The developer ShAll agree to .aintain the Artwork in a condition sAtisfactory to the Committee. The developer shall agree that any modifications of the project which may affect the artwork or its relatioMhip to the project shall be approved by the Planning Commission. Any other special.criteria for the artWOrk established by the committee. ~I. The General Guidelines and specific criteria established for artwork under the proqraa may, in exceptional circumstances as detex:mined by the Coaaittee, be waived. and/or modified. I. J. x. VIII. The ~ttee is authorized to develop and administer guide- lines and procedures for processing artwOrk proposals and applications. :IX. upon subaission of an appl.ication for any discretionary peJ:1lÚ.t, City staff shall provide the developer with a copy of the Art in Public Places Resolution, any Co~ttee Guidelines, and an artWOrk proposal application. X. City staff shall DOt issue a certificate of occupancy until such tiDe as the required artWOrk is coapleted and in place or the equivalent guarantee, 8uch as, but not li.mi.ted to, a bond, letter of credit, or cash deposit, has been approved by the Co..uni ty Developsaent D.ix'ector. XI. A developer may ap~.al a CollllÚ.ttee decision as follows: A. A developer shall have the right to file an appeal of a final decision of the Comaittee to the Cultural and Fine Arts CollØission ("COIIIIÚssion") within ten days of the decision. The filing of an appeal of the C~ttee's decision shall suspend the decision until the determination of the appeal or its withdrawal by the developer. B. The appeal shall be filed in writing with the Parks and Recreation Director ("Director") and shaLl be processed as folloW81 1. The Director shall schedule a hearing before the Commission within thirty days of the filing of the appeal. 2. After the hearing~ the Commission may affirm, reverse, or modify in whole or in part an appealed decision of the Committee. C. If the decision of the Commission is unsatisfactory to the deve10per, the developer shall have the right to file an appeal of the final decision of the Commission to the City Counci1 within ten days of the decision. The filing of an appeal of the Commission's decision shall suspend the decision until the determination of the appeal· or its withdrawal by the developer. D. The appeal shall·be filed in writing with the City Clerk and shall be processed as follows: 1. The City Clerk shall schedule a hearing before the City Council within 4S days of the filing of the appeal. -" . : R~SOLüTlON /f0. 9813 PAGC 4 '-' ....., 2. After the hearinq, the City Council may affirm, reverse, or .odify in whole or in part An appealed decision of the Co~ssion. "- 3. The decision of the City Council shall be final. . . APPROVED AND ADOP"rED thb 17th day of October 19~, by the following vote: NOES: Johs. Haron and Takasugi None AYES: ABSENT: Furr and Lopez AT'l'EST ' 1;"'··/1· . \ . . J . l~~~- c.- 0ì1~' p~ .. HAbi Pli.~, éL.ty ~erk PROVED '1'0' FORK: 8/0002/RES .. -' '-" ...." .'------.---.....-----.------- . I "'\ !!; r ; .'- : . " - \ \ City of Brea . Art in Public Places Policy Manual \ ."'.'\~&s ¡:~ . ""'II1II& .".". '. - '~..:I _........~.....~"~.". ...... --..~_. ._----::.~ .. ~ 4 . '-" """ CI'1'f ~ Clarice A. Blamer, Mayor SaD Cooper, Mayor Pro '1'Em Noœa Arias Hicks, Counc:ilwcman Carrey Nelson, Councilman John Sutton, Councilman Prepared by: Deparœent of Deve10pDent Services and Department of cœmmi ty Services Deca~~ 1984 ~)~ .~ --- "'" ......~.~.~ ... . .--.... --... _ÍIIIII . ~ ... . I. II. III. IV. '-" .....,¡ Table of Contents Introduction and Purpose...................................... Program Requirements.......................................... Guidelines for Art SCUlptures................................. Processing.................................................... Art in Public Places Program Proposal Application FOJ:m....... 6 Page 1 2 3 4 '-' 'wi! CI'l'!' œ BRFA ART DI PCBLIC PLACES PŒ..IC! ~ DecA.·.a ~ 1984 I. Inl:r~OQ and Purpose The City of Brea has prepared this manual in order to provide the public with the necessary information and requirements pertaining to the placement of an art sculpture in accordance with the Art in Public Places Program. The Ci ty of Brea bel ieves the image of a ci ty is more than just its layout or the physical characteristics of its streets and buildings. One major element of a Ci ty's image can be its art. Art can make a statement to all about who and what a city is, how it views itself, and how it is viewed by others. Public monaœnts and sculptures have o...·"'II;"·lOrated the progress and values of cultures and cam.mities. In keepinq with this philosophy, the Brea City Council in 1975 implemented an "Art in Public Places" proqram. The proqram was designed to intertwine public art with the City's private growth and developœnt. Today over fifty-four art pieces adorn the City serving as "people maqnets", which increases vitality and naturally attracts tourism, business and consumers. Public art can also serve as a business t.rademark,. conveyi119 growth and prosperity to the private and public sector alike. Brea's Art in Public Places is now one of the largest public sculpture progr211111S in the count:%y and continues to grow at an average rate of six pieces per year. The sculptures range in subject and style fraa free-flowing abstract: design to detai led realistic fiqures. The l18diums represented include steel, bronze, concrete, wood, plastic and stone. The collection boasts of work fraa internationally known artists such as Seiji Kunisl1Da fran Japan and Gidon Graetz fran Italy, along with praainent American artists such as Guy Dill, I'letcher Benton and Seward Johnson. The Art in Public Places program continues in a very unique way to nurture the growth and developœat of business and cœmunity involvement:. 1 ) '- I I I _ ............... ...,. - ..........-~ '-" "<wII II. PrograD RequirE!JEDts All new residential, cœmercial, and industrial developnent projects are required to acquire and install an art sculpture when the development project has a building valuation above $500,000. The amount identified as the mininun allocation for the acquisi tion of an art sculpture is based upon the total building (s) valuation as canputed using the latest Building Valuation Data as set forth by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO). A building valuation of up to $500,000 requires no art piece. A valuation of $500,001 up to $999,999 requires that 1\ of the total valuation be allocated for an art sculpture. A valuation of $1,000,000 and above would require an art allocation of $10,000, plus $2,000 for each million dollars of building valuation (including the first million dollars of valuation). Exaaçles of the art allocation fOt'"111as are as follows: Building Valuation $ 500,000 (no art piece required) 750,000 (1\ of valuation) 1,000,000 (10,000 + 2,000 x 1) 5,000,000 10,000,000 15,000,000 25,000,000 50,000,000 75,000,000 100,000,000 Miniuun Art Allocation -0- $ 7,500 U,OOO 20,000 30,000 40,000 60,000 liO,OOO 160,000 210 ,000 The Director of Developœnt Services shall have the option to pemit a donation in lieu of an art sculpture in the amount identified pursuant to the art allocation for.mula to the City for cultural enrichment. The provisions for an exception by the Director of Development Services shall be based upon a lack of public accessibility to an art piece or the scope of the developœnt project is sucb that the art piece will not meet the intent and guidelines of the program. 2 - ..... ............. -....... --- ~ ....., I I I . GuideliDes for Art Sc::ulpbJre Guidelines ~r the selection, acquisition, placement, identification, an::] maintenance of art sculptures are as foll0'«5: 1. The art sculpture shall be easily visible to the public street. 2. The art sculpture shall be located in an area specifically designated for such purpose. Installation of the Art Piece shall be planned and implemented to enhance the work and allow fe>r unobstructed public viewia; fran as many angles as possible. 3. The art sculpture subnittal shall include a canplete site plan with landscaping, lighting and other appropriate accessories to ~lement and protect the art work. 4. The ~sition of the art sculpture shall be of pema.nent-type materials and require a low level of maintenance. Durable and weather resistant materials are r~ed. 5. Lettering or signiBJ is not pemi tted upon the art sculpture or its foundation. 6. The art sculpture shall be constructed in a size that is proportional to the size of the adjacent bui Iding (s). 7. Expressions of obvious bad taste or profanity, which would likely be offensive to the general public, are inopa'tl"issible. 8. The art sculpture shall be designed by perSOAS with experience and knowledge of mcxuaental scale sculpture and shall provide the Ci ty with beckgroum infomation. 9. Developers shall be encouraged to provide a wide' range of sculptural styles, materials and types when selecting an art work for the program. 10. Water sc:u.lptures are not encouraged. u. In order to prov ide di versi ty and opportuni ty, not more than fi ve pieces by the same artist is encouraged. 12. Bach piece shall be identified by a plaque measuring approximately 8" X 8". The plaque shall be made of cast metal and will be placed in an appropriate location near the art piece and shall list only the date, title and the artist. 13. The art sculpture shall be maintained by the property owner in a neat and orderly manner acceptable to the City. 14. The art sculpture shall be a permanent, fixed asset to the property . 3 '-' 'wi IV . ProcessiD:} Processing-for an art sculpture begins with the City Planning Division of the Development Services Department apprising each developer of the requiranent for an outdoor sculpture as an element of the development proj~ Upon submission of a development project application, the City Planning Division shall give a copy of the Art in Public Places þrochure, proposal application and design guidelines to the developer. The City Planning Division will advise the Developer of the Progran and rec."Yiaucnd contact wi th the CuI tural Arts Di vision for further direction and program clarification pertaining to artistic optioruL When a development project requires the approval of a variance, conditional use permit, or related City approval, it shall be conditioned upon the developoent that the building project cannot be occupied until such time as the art sculpture is in place. The applicant shall sutmit to the City Planning Division a caupleted Art in Pub 1 ic Places appl ication (attached) and the proposed art piece in one or more of the following foCDats: 1. Photographs or slides of the subject art sculpture depicting several views. 2. A medel of the art sculpture. 3. A graphic or artist illustration of the art sculpture depicting several views. The subject art piece shall be an integral part of the landsc::aping and/or architecture of the building. Details as to specific landscaping and architectural treatment integrating the piece into an overall project design and maintenance factors required to insure its pemanenœ shall be included. The City Planning Division, upon receipt of the subject art piece and application, shall schedule a meeting with the "Art in Public Places Advisory Coamittee". The Art Advisory COIIIDittee serves to review proposed art for public areas in Brea and serves to maintain quality and di versi ty for the l'"r'WftNV\i ty. Ccmai t1:ee appointees shall have an art orientation and/or are qualified by education and/or experience in the field of art and/or developœnt:. The Calmi t1:ee is caaprised of the Director of Developœnt Services, or designee, the Director of Cn-mity Services, or designee, a IIII!IIIber of the Planning CCmnission as appointed by the Chair and a member of the Cultural Arts CcmDission, as appointed by the Chair. A recœmendation to the Directör of Developnent Services concerning findings and/or reconmendations on the proposed art piece wi 11 be sukmi tted wi thin thirty (30) days fran the date of sutmission. Upon approval, the City Planning Division shall notify the project developer in writing as to the acœpt:anœ and/or any comi tions. 4 '-' "-' Should the Director determine that the art piece is not consistent wi th the pQlicies and guidelines of the Art in Public Places Program, a letter shall be sent to the developer outlining the objections and/or concerns. A meeting will then be arranged between all parties invol ved to determine whether or not an al ternati ve art piece should be proposed and/or modifications should be made to the proposed art piece. The decision of the Director shall be final and shall become effecti ve 10 days after notification. Provided, however, that if within such 10 day period an appeal of the decision is filed by an aggrieved person, the filing of such appeal within such time limit shall suspend the decision of the Director until the detemination of the appeal by the CUl tural Arts Commission or its dismissal by the appellant. SUch appeal shall be filed in writing with the Director of ~1nity Services an::) shall be processed as follows: 1. Upon filing of an appeal the hearing date on said appeal to the CUltural Arts Cœm.issi~ shall be set by the Director of ()'wnnI1f1i ty Services 2. The Director shall tranSDÍt to the CUltural Arts Cœmission the original application, records, written reports and appeal disclosing in what respect the application am facts offered in support thereof met or failed to meet the requirements of the Art in Public Places Program. 3. The Cœmission may affirm, reverse, Or modify in whole or in part aa¡ appealed decision, dét:eJ:mination or requirement of the Director, but before granting any appealed petition which was denied by the Director, the Calmission shall indicate where the sculpture involved meets or does not meet the requirements set forth. The Cul tural Arts Cœaission's action may be appealed to the Ci ty council in accordance with City Code. ' 5 - '- ,...., CITY OF BRFA ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PR03RAM PROPOSAL APPLICATION LocationjAddress Project Developer Property OWner Ti tie of Art Sculpture Work Phone Artist Address City Telephone Media Approximate Weight Approximate COst Description of Art Piece Locatioo of Identification Plaque Description of Sculptural LPoumation Date of Installatioo Dimensions Site Location Distance Between Public Street and Art Piece Landscape Plans Special Problems Dedication Plana *NOTE: *Enclose artist backgrounà information and one or more of the following fOJ:mats: A. 8 x 10 photographs depicting several views of art piece B. Artist I s rendering depicting several views of art -piece C. Medel of art piece 6 .~ ....., INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney~ C.A. NO: 99-553 DATE: April 22, 1999 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 99-07 - Art in Public Places Attached please find a copy of the above-referenced draft ordinance. The ordinance has been revised since the March 12, 1999 worksession to separate transportation ¡rojects from other capital projects subject to the Art in Public Places calculation. Under the revised draft, funds from transportation projects would be restricted to site specific transportation enhancement projects, such as beautification projects or enhancement of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles. The list of eligible transportation enhancement projects is set forth in Section 1-5-1(11). The Board will review the revised draft ordinance during its worksession on April 30, 1999. If you have any questions or comments with regard to the ordinance prior to the worksession, please do not hesitate to contact me. Attachment HY/ Copies to: County Administrator Airport Director Community Development Director Leisure Services Director Public Works Director Central Services Manager Management and Budget Manager \o)rŒ © Œ n \'U,~I , !" ~ ; ; ¡ II ' j , ¡I i ! MAY - 3 rqqo ¡ , I \.)\"..Jj ",../ ,...-/ L _______--1 t1o.r'..' :~.J'''( "'- ,·,,'E~n --' 1"11 ~, ~, ,.' .' SI__~_lJ.i:':~~'--: ,:l:2~--=- L ,. /". .¡ ,-' '-' 'wi ORDINANCE NO. 99-07 AN ORDINANCE OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA CREATING CHAPTER 1-5 "ARTS", AND ARTICLE 1 "ART IN PUBLIC PLACES" OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES; CREATING SECTION 1-5-1 "DEFINITIONS"; CREATING SECTION 1-5-2 "ART IN PUBLIC PLACES PROGRAM"; CREATING SECTION 1-5-3 "ART IN PUBLIC PLACES TRUST FUND"; CREATING SECTION 1-5-4 "OWNERSHIP AND MAINTENANCE OF ARTWORKS"; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; PROVIDING AND EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. CHAPTER 1-5 "ART" and ARTICLE 1 "ART IN PUBLIC PLACES" of Chapter 1-5 are hereby created as follows: Article 1. Art in Public Places Section 1-5-1. Public Art and Design: fL. Definitions. For the purpose of this section. the following words or terms are defined as follows: ill Artwork means works in a variety of media produced by professional visual artists. Works may be permanent. temporary or functional. ill Board means the Board of County Commissioners for St. Lucie County. Florida. ill Cavital Project means any County capital improvement project costing more than one hundred thousand and 00/100 ($100.000) dollars and paid iOr wholly or in part by funds appropriated by St. Lucie County to construct or renovate any park. beach restoration. above grade utility. and to construct or renovate any building. except a County detention facility. 1 Underlined words are added. Struck through words are deleted. ~ '...I ® County means St. Lucie County. Florida. ill Council means the St. Lucie Cultural Affairs Council. ® Eligible Construction Costs means the total project appropriation. including engineering and design. but not including demolition costs. equipment costs except for the cost of custom designed equipment or equipment that creates a new use for a building or facility. real property acquisition costs. impact fees. enterprise funds. and soil remediation costs. ill Equioment Costs means. for the purposes of the public art/design and transportation enhancement project calculation. those costs for the acquisition of mechanical equipment of standard manufacture. íID. Master Plan means a manual of criteria for the selection of sites and artwork and transportation enhancement proiects for public capital and transportation facilities to be developed by the Council and approved by the Board prior to its implementation. This manual shall also provide for a comprehensive program for Art in Public Places which shall include the display of loaned art in appropriate public buildings. í2l Renovation means a capital project or transportation capital project which is a major redesign of a facility or system or a portion of a facility or ~stem which is included in the County's capital program budget and which requires a building permit from the appropriate governmental iurisdiction. Renovation shall also include a capital project or transportation capital project which is an expansion or upgrading the capacity of the facility or system. enlarging the facility. or creating new use for the facility. It shall not include repairs. maintemnce. installation of mechanical equipment. or modifications required solely for ADA compliance. .QQl Transoortation Capital Proiect means any County capital transportation improvement project costing more than one hundred and 00/100 dollars ($100.000.00) and paid for wholly or in part by funds appropriated by St. Lucie County to construct or renovate any highway or arterial. bridge or causeway. sidewalk. or bikeway or any road beautificatim project. .a..u Transoortation Enhancement Proiect means one or more of the following: ill Visual enhancement of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles. ílù Scenic or historic highway programs. including the provision of tourist am welcome center facilities. .(ç) Landscaping and other scenic beautification projects. @ Historic preservation. 2 Underlined words are added. Struck through words are deleted. ~ " ....., .."" W Rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings. structures. or facilities. including historic railroad facilities and canals. ill Preservation of abandoned railway corridors. including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian or bicycle trails. W Archeological planning and research. ilil Environmental mitigation to address water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity. and establishment of transportation museums. @ Trust Fund means the Art in Public Places Trust Fund created pursuant to this ordinance and shall include all gifts and donations deposited in the Trust Fund. Section 1-5-2. Art in Public Places Program. ª'- Appropriations for County Capital Projects shall include an amount equal to two percent (2 %) of the total Eligible Construction Costs to be used for artist design services and for the selection. acquisition and display of artworks for related education programs. for the maintenance of County artworks. and for the administration of the Master Plan. Funds appropriated for one capital project. but not deemed necessary or appropriate by the Council in whole or in part for that project. may be expended on other public art projects approved under the annual Master Plan. subject to any bond restrictions and legal or grant restrictions. Bond funds shall be appropriated and accounted for in the bond capital proiect accounts. Projects costi~ less than one hundred thousand and 00/100 ($100.000.00) dollars shall be subject to the public art calculation and such funds will be pooled for other art projects. All County agencies may opt to participate in the Art in Public Places program for any improvement project not otherwiæ subject to this ordinance. 1L. Appropriations for transportation capital proiects shall include an amount equal to one percent (1 %) of the total Eligible Construction Costs to be used for site specific transportatirn enhancement projects. including artist design services for such projects. for the maintenance of such projects. and for the administration of the Master Plan relating to such projects. Born funds shall be appropriated and accounted for in the bond capital project accounts. Transportation projects costing less than one hundred thousand and 00/100 ($100.000.00) dollars are subject to the transportation enhancement projects calculation and such funds shall be pooled for other transportation enhancement projects. c. The first priority for use of funds generated by a capital project shall be that capital project site. The monies appropriated under this ordinance may be used for artist design services. for the development of design concepts and models. and for the selection. acquisition. purchase. commissioning. placement. installation. exhibition and/or display of artworks. Artworks and 3 Underlined words are added. Struck through words are deleted. " "- ..,.; transportation enhancement projects shall be selected in accordance with the Master Plan and mqy be temporary or permanent. may be integral to the architecture or may be incorporated into the project. Integration of the artists' design concepts into the project architecture and/or design should be ensured. insofar as is feasible. by the concurrent selection of the artistes) with the architect. engineer. or project designer. d. In the case of a project which involves the use of grant or County bond proceeds issued after the effective date of this ordinance. amounts for artist design services and artworks described in this ordinance shall be used for projects and capital purposes consistent with state am federal laws. the resolutions and/or ordinances approved by the Board and the terms of the grant agreement. k.. With the exception of transportation capital projects or as otherwise restricted by the Board. any applicable bond resolution or ordinance. local. state or federal law. or the conditions of a granting authority. monies generated under this ordinance may be pooled and expended for any public art and design project in the County. subject to the approved Master Plan. Pooled funds may be used as seed money for artists' fees to initiate partnerships with private and other public entities to provide public art and aesthetic enhancements in St. Lucie County. pursuant to a written agreement. f. To the extent allowed by grant guidelines and by law. all County agencies shall. from the effective date of this ordinance. include in all applications for funding to outside grantÏIg organizations or governmental agencies. an amount equal to two percent (2%) of eligible construction costs for a capital project or an amount equal to one percent (1 %) of eligible construction costs for a transportation capital project for artist design services and artworks or transportation enhancement projects. as specified herein. g.. The minimum amount to be appropriated for artist design services. artworks. and transportation enhancement projects shall be the total eligible construction costs multiplied by 0.02 or 0.01. as appropriate. This calculation shall be made by the County agency priŒ to the time of the appropriation for the County's capital program. An amount equal to fifteen percent (15 %) of the eligible allocation of the construction project (which is 0.003 or 0.0015 of the total eligible construction costs. as appropriate) may be used for project support and community participation activities. For public-owned property this may include staffing. artist selection-related costs (excluding travel of the selection committee). consultants. designJproposal/moquette costs. identifying plaques. project documentation. publicity. community education activities and other purposes as may be deemed appropriate for the administration of the program. An amount equal to fifteen percent (15 %) of the eligible public art allocation of the construction project for a capital project (which is 0.003 of the total eligible construction costs) shall be set aside in a separate account within the Trust Fund for curatorial services and the preservation and maintenance of 4 Underlined words are added. Struck through words are deleted. " "-' ...." County artworks. An amount equal to fifteen percent 05 %) of the eligible public art allocation of the construction project for a transportation capital proiect (which is 0.0015 of the total eligibe construction costs) shall be set aside in a separate account within the Trust Fund for curatorial services and the preservation and maintenance of the specific transportation enhancement project. The Council shall recommend that any artwork or transportation enhancement project needing extraordinary operational or maintenance costs be reviewed by the appropriate County agency director prior to recommendation to the Board. The Council shall also be responsible for conducting an annual maintenance survey of artworks and transportation enhancement projects. This survey shall include a condition report on each work. prioritized recommendations for the restoration or repair and maintenance. and estimated costs. Such repair and maintenance shall comply with any contractual obligations which may have been entered into by the County in the acquisition of the artworks. Expenditures of monies in the artwork and transportation enhancement projects maintenance and project support accounts shall be annually recommended by the Council and included in the proposed annual budget submitted to the Board. Funds in the maintenance and conservation account not expended by the end of the close of any fiscal year shall be carried forward. The Council shall also. review and update as necessary the insurance requirements for artworks at least every five (5) years. Section 1-5-3. Art in Public Places Trust Fund. ª-'. Created. There is hereby created "Art in Public Places Trust Fund" consisting of all funds appropriated and deposited to the Trust Fund in connection with the construction or renovation of a facility or system pursuant to sections 1-5-2(a) and 1-5-2(b). The Trust Fund is also authorized to accept gifts. grants and donations made to St. Lucie County for works of art. All appropriations. gifts. grants and awards of monies hereunder shall be deposited in an interest- bearing account entitled the "St. Lucie County Art in Public Places Trust Fund Account". which shall be a separate account established and maintained apart from the general revenue funds and accounts of St. Lucie County. All interest in said account shall accrue to the use and benefit of the Trust Fund account. b. Term of existence. The St. Lucie County Art in Public Places Trust Fund AccoUl1 shall be self-perpetuating from year to year unless specifically terminated by the Board. k.. Trust assets. All appropriations. gifts. grants and awards of money or property received hereunder from either public or private donors shall be placed in trust for and inure to the use and benefit of St. Lucie County for public art and desgn purposes: and said property and funds shall be expended. utilized and disbursed pursuant to the provisions of this section. d. Aooropriations and donations. 5 Underlined words are added. Struck through words are deleted. ,. ¡?' , -...' ...", ill Eligible monies appropriated pursuant to this ordinance shall be transferred to the Trust Fund. This transfer shall take place within thirty (30) days of the original proiect appropriation by the Board. ill Funds deposited or credited to the St. Lucie County Art in Public Places Trust Fund Account. except funds for maintenance and conservation of County artworks and transportation enhancement projects. not expended or obligated by the close of any fiscal year shall be carried over automatically for a period of three (3) years beyond the close of the County construction proiect. or upon recommendation of the Council. carried over for an additional two (2) years. Any funds carried over for three (3) years. or upon request five (5) years. and still unexpended at the expiration of such period. shall be transferred to the General Fund for general art purposes or transportation enhancement projects. as appropriate. only: provided that funds derived from other restricted sources shall revert to the funds from which originally appropriated at the expiration of said three (3) or five (5) year period. or if project is canceled. as applicable. ill Any gifts. grants and awards received subject to a condition shall be expended strictly in accordance with such condition. Section 1-5-4. Ownership and maintenance of artworks. Unless otherwise provided. ownership of all works of art acquired by the County under this ordinance shall be vested in the County. including copyrights. patents ani other reproduction rights. The Board shall be responsible for managing the reproduction rights of each acquisition with advice from the Council. Custody. supervision. maintenance and preservation of the works of art shall be the responsibility of the County. and shall be carried out by Qualified art professionals with appropriate collaboration with the Council. PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, and adopted prior to January 1, 1969, 5t. Lucie County ordinances and St. Lucie Coun1y resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY If any section, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is held to be invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, then said holding shall in no way affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. 6 Underlined words are added. Struck through words are deleted. .. ..' , Ç'" ~' ..""... PART D. CODIFICATION It is the intention of the Board of County Commissioners that the provisions of this Ordinance shall become and be made a part of the St. Lucie County Code; and that the sections of this Ordinance may be renumbered or relettered and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or such other appropriate word or phrase in order to accomplish such intentions, provided, however, that Parts B through F shall not be codified. PART E. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall become October 1, 1999. PART F. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis Vice Chairman John D. Bruhn Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xx XX XX XX XX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this day of ,1999. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney g: \atty\ordnance \ 1999\99-07 . wpd 7 Underlined words are added. Struck through words are deleted. ~ -., '-' """ AGENDA REQUJ:ST ITEM NO. ~ 5 DATE: June 1, 1999 CONSENT [ . ] REGULAR ["" ] PUBLIC HEARING PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: community Development/Tourism Division COMMUNITY DEV. DIRECTOR st. Lucie county Billboard Art Design and New Ads During the March 9, 1999 BOCC meeting the Board approved the concept of what type of generic visitor messages should be used on three of the Glades Road Landfill billboard faces and other board locations being utilized throughout Florida. These art concepts have become a reality, as the attached samples will attest. The new creative designs makes powerful statements while using very few words and dynamite graphics. The four boards are clever, fun. and they are sure to attract the attention of the driving public while promoting st. Lucie County as a year-round visitor destination. The Tourist Development Council has taken this billboard look and theme one step further by producing three new ads (see attached) using the same continuity of art work and icons. These ads will also promote the TDC's new Web Site that will be debuting this s urnrne r . PREVIOUS ACTION: FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff request approval from the Board to accept the art work design for the billboards and new ads. COMMISSION ACTION: [0 APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Include scientific research in the ads. Show beaches, water County Attorney: .,-.. - derson Administrator coordination/signatures Management & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept.: Other: Other: FORMS\AGNUQ Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) -. en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ADS Fr.m Tee... T. Shining f '-' AGENDA REQUEST ....,; ITEM NO. A1 DATE: June 1, 1999 REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ CONSENT [ x TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: OMB PRESENTED BY: Harvey Lincoln SUBJECT: Scoreboard St. Lucie County Sports Complex BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County has received a check in the amount of $149,763.00 from the New York Mets to be used as a partial payment of the new scoreboard at the Sports Complex. Sufficient funds are available from donations from the New York Mets to cover the partial acquisition of the scoreboard . This action requests approval for the receipt and expenditure of these funds. FUNDS AVAilABLE: Funds will be made available in account # 461-7520-563000-7653. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the Resolution # 99-119. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [v1 APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED oug Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: ~ , Coordinatio n/Sia natures Management & Budget: XX V Purchasing: Originating Dept: Public Works: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) - - ~ ....." (\\ .. RESOLUTION NO. 99- 119 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Budget for St. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have become available from the New York Mets for partial payment for the new scoreboard at the St. Lucie County sports Complex. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 1s1 day of June, 1999, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 1998-99, and the County's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUE 461-7520-366900-7653 Donations $149,763.00 APPROPRIATIONS 461-7520-563000-7653 Improvements OIT Buildings $ 149,763.00 After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis Vice Chairman John D. Bruhn Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Doug Coward xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 1st DAY OF June, 1999. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY '-' ...." ..., CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT / \ / \ /\ j\ / \ ......~ FINANCE DEPARTMENT MEMO RAND I _I ¡ -NAG~~~ OF r:-~OGEI' II . ~ 2 5 1999 I ¡ ) Sì. tUc/e---.c· . ···~~/¡ --- our.¡¡y Fl.o Manager~ DATE: Harvey Lincoln, Management & Budget Chris Hartley, Finance Directo~ May 24, 1999 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Payment for Scoreboard Attached is a copy of a memo from Dan McIntyre regarding the above subject. Finance has deposited the referenced check. At this time we appreciate your assistance in obtaining a revenue number to record the payment and a purchase order to make the payment to A.D. Systems. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. CH/llh cc: Dan McIntyre, County Attorney Sharon Bouton, Assistant Finance Director 99-122 memos.fd/scoreboard '-" "wi INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA C.A. NO. Chris Hartley, Finance Director ,. CY Daniel S. Mcintyre, County Attorney (;(1 99-684 TO: FROM: DA TE: May 19, 1999 SUBJECT: Payment for Scoreboard ----------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------- 1 have reviewed the memorandum dated May 12, from Assistant Finance Director Sharon Bouton to Harvey Lincoln and Albie Scoggins. Since the County has a contract with A.D. Systems that contemplated by the County, 1 recommend that you immediately deposit the check from the Mets and issue a County check for final payment to A.D. Systems. DSM/caf Copy to: Leisure Services Director Stadium Manager l- N >-ï:J t-z. ~ Zt- ::Jc:: :c 0< 0- Ue:.. '¡..Jl.LJ :"'c ULo..: N ::Jc >- _L.": -- oe:c ¡-:<r. :z: (JÎ'Z Cf\ '. Cf\ ~. ~ "wi' CLERK OF CIRCUIT COURT II / \ k~ FINANCE DEPARTMENT /\ / \ MEMORANDUM FROM: Harvey Lincoln, Management & Budget Manager Albie Scoggins, Stadium Supervisor . ~ Sharon Bouton, Assistant Finance Directo~~~~ / TO: DATE: May 12, 1999 RE: NY Mets Payment Attached is $149,763.00, a copy of the NY Mets check, for payment of the "scoreboard". in the amount of We have not deposited this check into the Board of County Commissioners Operating Account at Riverside National Bank. Please provide our office with documentation supporting payment from the NY Mets to the County. All documents in our files state payment is to be made to A.D. Systems by the NY Mets. If you have any questions or require any additional information, please feel free to contact me. Thank you for your assistance in this matter. SB:lh cc: Gary Perdew, Management & Budget Susan Lawrence, Grants/Contracts Supervisor -- 99-114 memos.afd/n~etsscorebcard - .' . ___'..0: ~::.:~'::: -~~~~~:. ':.0..=::.--.:" .:.' ',":d- . . --'.' - -- --..-- .... '.'_ 0" --...-..----- "-...- ._.¡...:_;.....~:~......- ~....---- ...-....-. -~----. - "'"I '-'" 250323 ST LUCIE COUNTY CHECK PAYMEN-~R. DATE 75049 05/04/9' ... -, 'INVOICE· - : DESCRIPTION ~ P.O. NO. - ('''''.,855 RE SCOREBOÁRD -, ' i49763AOO OAOO i49763 , . - - .~- /,...., '. ,.: ::~', ,/ "\ I'·~.-~,~ '''.3~: .\ I _'., ~ .,. \ 1 :~..~.~.;;J ~ \ :Jl~.'), \ "-1 .' '.-' , " , ~ ,-.-. . _3/-'" - '~I'" "-- -,-;.. I- >- .-:-; ;.-. ::~ 5~_ a-- u¿: N C- \...:.jW-: ~G N ___(.lt~'L.--t 149763.00 0.00 149763 -'-' >- ." ~ ~7=~LNG ccueL=~.7i ~iiÏ=;:;:~=s L? ~-- ---.. ..--.---..----. - --';7--':::':""---" ----..- --- ~-:..:-o... .............c + >0)01'.... . ..o"'lll <.... >þo:ltl...... .........01'"... "þ....... ......<11(' -4Õo ~,..,..... .....~< ~ þ" .-.... ..........c_...>,.;..............~..... >þ~.... ......ct-c.. >.;:a.... 01 ~I ælNEW YORK æ' ê .:il >:~I 'I ê: \ . m\ ~! ... :-. < -+ .Jot..... . .........<... Jo...... ......."'-1:... >.....- ........"'.c:.... ~ þ_.... ...<d.fOc:'.... ~..... ......-...-.. ~ --_........._..~ -' ~ SrËA 57 ";CiL~.I. :-...:.-~;..<~~G. ~r( ~ 1353 - - -.. - - .-.---.----- .. -<.. ~þ =-.... ......<.. ~þ ..... ......- THE CHASE MANI"!A IT)oN 3ANK WILMINGiON. CEL~W,.1;:;E 19.a01 52·~~ 3i1 : 1 CCC..,9 I NO·O 7 5 0 4 9 NATIONAL LEAGUE BASEBALL CLUB DATE 05/04/99 75049 0;. i ****149763 A I ¡ . ,AMOUNT'· SHEA STADIUM' F'-USH'SG. ~=W YORK 11368 PÓNE HUNDRED FORTY-NINE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED SIXTY-ïHREE AND OO/iOO--r TO THE ORDER OF ST LUCIE COUNTY 2300 VIR~INIA AVE FORT F'IE::::CE: FL 34982 1110 7 50 1..¡ q nl I: 0 ~ ~ ~ 0 0 2 S ? I: b j 0 ~ 1..¡ ~ 00 0 ~ SO q III . : r:....;::.-:-:-:;..-;·---..-.-· :::.,..:;-....... ........--.._- -.-.-- -- _.__..-.---~._---~_.,-"'.-..-' ----. -.-..' -_.' .- - .------- --==~.-~_.---:.....:~;... .__ C'~~..,-._~.---.....,.,....-,J..~-.------.:---~ ~--'.-' ;,,-, .-:~'--'-- ,-,.......... - '---. -, ....... ,.-._~.--:.'~'-' ~.~-:-. .:.": "".- - .:-;-__--:-_-:-;--0 - -----. .... '" ·u.__.... _..~. ",- -. ~. . _._.......~'7::- ._--.--_..~ <.~...-.,....-..- -', ., " '" .._~-~"';.-.:-.-:::~_.~:..~.. c. _..- - - - -- - ,,-- -- - . - --- ~ .... -' . _..~"...~~~~~-----.;...w.~.~-~ . T.,......~...~·~"'::..·..-··- ~.. ..---~~~~~_.. -. -=-:. .'-~~"" '., ----.-. ....4__.... _.~.ø--~~ ---... -.~-~---:-- -~-:::. _~~.........~--:-_~.~.~-:O-'~':;::;1I1 __.,___-._ _. ..~.___....;~ _. - 1 -._:~~""..-¡'=\o"f~"',_ ...~'.' ,.~~",::..._ ...~~,...~_. _,-......,.----~..-:;\o~.... -":>.,. . ~ þ- ........ -.', -.- 100.,....; ~~:"'~~"II:"":"T;:J'...o:=-~;..;." '. ..~- : .-~._. .... ..~~ .~-- ..;..-..~._-~..-... :'-. ...,.:.:=-;~~.:~: ..-..,........._---:--:. ....: -~ -'.. ,=- ........ -~: ...~":."Ä-,.:'~.,-?--j~~_-::":'..--~,;,-~-:-:-..- ....'-. -.-':.?-'-". ,. -':'" .-. -. - --.. .: ..... ..-.- _..... PR!_ ~ .... _.__";II-_.iIJ. ~_ ...... .r;-_.......-:~. . -. ....---... .!. ~ ~.:~~:--~. :>:..~..'~-~-": -~'-~~ a_-;--......~..- ~...~.~~.----.--~-.. -......-~ , .. . ".~' ... ~- - -', -:~;:~. . ':~~'i~~~"~~:' .~~:~u.,;~.::~~""-,.~"~~~:·:--= ·.~1~~l2~~;L~,j~~~~;:-~~è~~~~·~ "",.,.. ~ '....,I ITEM NO. A·~ AGENDA REQUEST DATE: June 15,1999 CONSENT [X] REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [ Leg. [ ] Quasi-JD. [ ] ] SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Community Development PRESENTED BY: ~.S'~ ? Department Head TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Authorize an amount not to exceed $2,000 to advertise the St. Lucie County Small Business Workshop in area newspapers. BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County through the Economic Development Division is sponsoring and organizing a Small Business Workshop on Friday, June 18th, 1999, at the Port St. Lucie Community Center. The flier is attached for your information. A small ad provided by The Tribune at no cost appeared on May 15, 1999. In order to provide adequate media coverage through the business community and for the public, it is the intention of the Economic Development Division to take out more prominent advertising space in the area newspapers on Sunday June 6th, with a reminder ad appearing on Wednesday June 9th. The cost of the ad will not exceed $2,000. FUNDS AVAIL.: 001-1515-549000-100 PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to purchase advertising in area newspapers for the St. Lucie County Small Business Workshop in amount not to exceed $2,000. COMMISSION ACTION: [0 APPROVED [ ] OTHER: DENIED g sAnderson ty Administrator Coordination/Signatures Mgt & Budget: purchasing: County Attorney: Finance: (copies only): ]A U Other: Other: Originating Dept: BFF. 1l/{/93 , '. IlL ST. LUCIE COUNTY'S SMALL BUSINESS WORKSHOP Friday, June 18th, 1999 8:30 A.M. - 3:30 P.M. * Keynote Speaker Steven B. Chapman * * * * * * * (duPont Registry Magazine) Topics for Discussion Effective Business Planning Workforce Training Programs Business Assistance Resources How to Buy/Sell a Business Financing Your Small Business Marketing Tools That Work Issues Facing Today's Small Business * The Small Business Workshop will be held at the Port St. Lucie Community Center, 2195 S. E. Airoso Boulevard. For additional information please call Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson's office at 462-1451. Registration is required and must be received by June 11 th, 1999. Registration fee is $15.00 and checks should be made payable to: St. Lucie County Board of County Commission R,e ,t '\:t.,;r,n ,to: Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson 2300 Virginia Avenue Third Floor - Room 304 Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Community Development, St. Lucie County Chamber of Commerce, City of Fort Pierce and Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie County Board of Realtors - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - APPLICANTS NAME BUSINESS NAME MAILING ADDRESS TELEPHONE NUMBER FAX ~ . ..",¡II The Tribune · Saturday, May 15, ·1999 · B3 · Thinking of starting your own business? · Need advice on 'how· to improve· your small ~business? Friday, June 18 8:30am-~:30pm Port St. Lucie Community Center ¡ Return form and check for $15.00 payable to St. Luåe County Board of County Commissioners to Commissoner Frannie Hutchinson 2300 VIrginia Ave., 3rd floor #304 Fort Pierce; FL 34982 Deadline for registratiþn - June 11, 1999 r------------------, IRegistration Form - Please Print or Type I I . I I Name I I Business Name I I I I Mailing Address I I Telephone' " Fax I L _ _ _ _ _ _ _.=.=-~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _.J 0' - ... ....,. - .... ~ 06/01199 ~ LUCIE COUNIT - BOARD ....,.¡ PAGE 1 FZABWARR WARRANT LIST #35- 22-HAY-99 TO 28-HAY-99 'I¡ FUND SUMMARY / r· FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL " 001 General Fund 486,822.25 242,157.28 001116 Sec 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning 98/99 1,097.04 4,590.46 001120 Community Services Block Grnt 98/99 3,011.37 0.00 001235 TDC Planning Grant 98/99 25.50 198.83 .. 001242 98/99 E. M.. P.A. 300.00 0.00 001244 SLC Automated Court Record Sys 412,810.00 0.00 101 Transportation Trust Fund 66,138.85 87,929.84 101001 Transportation Trust Interlocals 3,931.00 0.00 101002 Transportation Trust/80% Constitut 27,545.01 0.00 101003 Transportation Trust/Local Option 117,991.10 0.00 101006 Transportation Trust/Impact Fees 25,671.50 0.00 102 Unincorporated Services Fund 16,053.41 35,235.44 102001 Drainage Maintenance MSTU 1,819.11 2,917.14 102103 Urban & Community Forestry 97/98 134.00 0.00 105 Library Special Grants Fund 82,042.00 1,876.47 107 Fine & Forfeiture Fund 2,993,964.73 58,088.11 111 River Park I Fund 2,517.55 0.00 113 Harmony Heights 3 Fund 197.32 0.00 114 Harmony Heights 4 Fund 434.85 0.00 116 Sunland Gardens Fund 481. 82 0.00 117 Sunrise Park Fund 120.29 0.00 119 Holiday Pines Fund 695.95 0.00 120 The Grove Fund 138. 22 0.00 122 Indian River Estates Fund 832.80 0.00 123 Queens Cove Lighting Dist#13 Fund 244.65 0.00 '" ·!!f~::i? 126 Southern Oak Estates Lighting 108.57 0.00 136 Monte Carlo Lighting MSTU#4 Fund 1,275.23 0.00 138 Palm Lake Gardens MSTU Fund 103.55 0.00 139 Palm Grove Fund 648.34 0.00 140 Port & Airport Fund 4,162.39 7,587.24 140274 FOOT/ Terminal Expansion 233,917.97 0.00 145810 98-99 SWIM Imp. VIII Restoration 898.91 0.00 160 Plan Maintenance RAD Fund 1,142.59 2,245.46 170 Court Facilities Fund 149.99 0.00 182 Environmental Land Acquisition Fund 1,272.74- 1,431.39 183 Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir 2,438.43 3,222.71 183001 Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat 259.91- 2,449.60 183004 Ct Admin.- Teen Court 1,372.00 897.60 183206 FDJJ-Teen Court 98/99 273.00 1 , 138.46 185201 FHFA-185-SHIP 96/97 0.00 343.95 185202 FHFA- SHIP 97/98 39,622.72 0.00 185203 FHFA-SHIP 98/99 520.00 888.85 186 Recycling Operating Fund 215.52 1,334.69 186202 DEP-Recycling & Education 98/99 68.25 444.89 310001 Impact Fees-Library 10,622.00 0.00 :-ï 315201 DOS-315-Fort Pierce Branch Library 271,729.75 0.00 316 County Capital 72,974.50 0.00 ~ 316001 Transportation Capital 10,620.00 0.00 ..¡ i . ".'. , '~ .. ¡y.- - - - ... 06/01/99 ~LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD "WI PAGE 2 FZABTJARR TJARRANT LIST #35- 22-MAY-99 TO 28-MAY-99 FUND SUMMARY ~ FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 352 SHI Yastewater Treatment Proj Fund 70,458.30 0.00 382 Environmental Land Capital Fund 311. 20 0.00 401 Sanitary Landfill Fund 14,131.08 25,398.69 418 Golf Course Fund 12,865.81 16,804.04 421 H.E.Y. Utilities Fund 119.75 142.31 441 North Hutchinson Island Utilities 1 ,665 . 13 2,373.33 448 Renewal & Replacement Fund 4,090.00 0.00 451 S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund 1,289.47 2,230.83 461 Sports Complex Fund 161,319.02 9,688.11 491 Building Code Fund 5,967.66 15,368.70 501 Automated Services Fund 224,631. 55 55,372.11 505 Health Insurance Fund 32,006.00 0.00 505001 Property/Casualty Insurance Fund 5,808.62 0.00 510 Service Garage Fund 8,849.05 8,949.08 611 Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund 1,049.21 2,751.50 625 Law Library 709.82 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 5,441,623.05 594,057.11 ---._, ,:." ·"';'·c_~;:, I ~7 ¡:C0, ~....-1i't'~. ~,- .:'~.... ~", :. y" ¡:~' ...~ ~ 06/01/99 FZABVARR FUND: 001 CHECK ~LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD VOID LISTU 35- 22-MAY-99 TO 28-MAY-99 - General Fund 'j INVOICE VENOOR 00240512 99016170 Fla Counties Foundation 00243254 99023260 Peabody Hotel FUND TOTAL: _ _ ____---=--___ . 4!- _ .__ ~~_ <~~-- - -'\;~~.".,.~ "'wII TOTAL 90.00 220.00 310.00 PAGE 1 c: "'~'" /,'~'.,.-, /.~......~,,- \ - """"""" i·- \ . .. . .., ~..", :1'-.,,-, --"'cr'" ·~_~~_u_______ ._,-_____.,.,,. 06/01/99 ~LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ......, FZABYARR VOID LIST# 35- 22-MAY-99 TO 28-MAY-99 FUND: 107 - Fine & Forfeiture Fund . J CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00239434 99012798 Miranda, PhD, Simon B 146.00 146.00 FUND TOTAL: ~ ~'. ,.-;......,.......,:..,:::-."'"~"......""~."C.:"'._ .:.,......,'~.^:.;.(¿'''''':'',..-....t'.....~. - ,..'''-~..-.. ."-.' PAGE 2 ."",,- '-" ....., AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. C-2 DATE: June 1, 1999 REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT [ XX ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Susan Kilmer SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) Library SUBJECT: SIRSI Software Mainten~nce Contract (Sole Source) BACKGROUND: SIRSI has provided software maintenance support on the Library's Unicorn software since the original purchase of the program in 1991. The County Attorney's office has reviewed this contract for form and correctness. FUNDS AVAIL. 001-7110-534110-700 Software Contracts ($14,678.00) PREVIOUS ACTION: Software support maintenance agreement has been renewed annually since 1992. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the sole source contract be approved and authorize the Chairman to sign at the time of approval. COMMISSION ACTION: [ ~APPROVED [ ] OTHER: ] DENIED XXCounty Attorney: XXOrginating Dep~~ '£'" / ;/ ~Ll ~, Review and ADDrovals Mgt. & Budget: Other: XX Purchasing: cB Other: Finance: (Check for copy only, if applicable) '-' """ c -Z- i' , 'I " MEMORANDUM 99 - 123 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Susan B. Kilmer, Library Director .xitúúU£/;f:i&~-~~) DATE: May 18, 1999 SUBJECT: SIRSI Maintenance Support Contract ***************************************************************** Software Maintenance Support has been provided by SIRS I as a sole source since 1991 when the program was purchased and installed. The software maintenance is essential to the continuing function and upgrade of the St. Lucie County Library's online system. Staff forward daily system problems to the SIRSI helpdesk by e- mail, which are correctly in a timely manner. The Helpdesk staff is just a phone call away for sYßtem emergencies or advice on how to generate new reports and configure new system parameters, as they are needed. SIRSI software maintenance also provides for the periodic upgrading of the online system to the most recent releases with interim "fixes" as needed. The following software modules are covered by the Maintenance agreement: Bibliographic and Inventory Control Authority Control Enhanced Public Access Circulation Control Acquisitions Management Multi-user Gateway Electronic Mail Bibliographic Import Bibliophile Interface Unlimited InfoView for DOS/Terminals Request Module WebCat World Wide Web Catalog The alternative to the yearly maintenance agreement is to pay SIRSI technicians at high hourly rates for each request; upgrades would have to be purchased individually with additional charges for the SIRSI technicians to implement that upgrade SIRSI is a sole source for this maintenance contract. - - -.... ~ SCHhuúLE "A" SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT between SIRSI CORPORATION and ST. LUCIE COUNTY '( Installation Date: July 22, 1991 Maintenance effective: August 1, 1999 - July 31, 2000 Software Modules (III) Annual Fee Bibliographic and Inventory Control Authority Control Enhanced Public Access Circulation Control Acquisitions Management Multi-User Gateway Electronic Mail Bibliographic Import Bibliofile Interface Unlimited InfoView for DOS/Terminals $ 3,584.00 832.00 864.00 1,712.00 1,712.00 500.00 150.00 NC NC 1,500.00 Added 12/10/94 Request Module 432.00 Added 04/27/98 Maintenance Effective: 04/27/99 - 04/26/00 WebCat World Wide Web Catalog 3,392.00 --------- $ 14,678.00 --------- --------- * Your projected maintenance quote for the coverage effective: August 1, 2000 - July 31, 2001 will not exceed $ 16,265.00. This is based upon the software modules which you currently have licensed. The estimated 2nd year annual maintenance fees for the OutReach Services Module is $ 910.00. -..... -.. ~ ......., ITEM NO. C - 3k AGENDA REQUEST DATE: June 1, 1999 REGULAR [ PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : County Attorney Donald G. Cole Property Acquisition Manager SUBJECT: Request permission to Advertise for a Public Hearing Abandonment of Becker Road - Old BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County owns the old alignment of Becker Road. According to the Agreement between St. Lucie County and Atlantic Gulf Communities, upon completion of construction of the new alignment of Becker Road, St. Lucie County agreed to initiate abandonment proceedings of the old alignment of Becker Road. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: August 11, 1998 Request Abandonment Proceedings and Advertise - Notice of Intent permission to Initiate Request permission to RECOMMENDATION: Staff is requesting permission to advertise for a Public Hearing to be held on July 6, 1999, which is a night meeting. DENIED ~Q~::::O:::IQN: [ ] OTHER: u as Anderson County Administrator XX County Attorney: 8r Review and Approvals xx Engineering:~ XX Public Works~t'-(/,,- / Purchasing: xx Originating Dept. -=z-: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) E f f 5 / 9 6 y - - ... -- .. ~ '--' AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. C-3B " DATE: June 1, 1999 CONSENT X REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ ] Quasi-JD. TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBJECT: Public Hearing Advance Notice. SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Community Development BACKGROUND: The following public Commissioners meeting thereafter as possible. hearings of June will be 15, 1999, scheduled at 7:00 for p.m., the or County as soon 1. BROADMOOR ALZHEIMER'S AND MEMORY IMPAIRMENT CENTER, for a Chañge in Zoning from the RM-11 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 11 du/acre) zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the expansion of an Adult Congregate Living Facility. (Location: 200 Dixieland Drive) 2. JAMES AND SHIRLEY CAGLE, for a Change in zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single-Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the expansion of an existing Adult Congregate Living Facility. (Location: 5615 Oleander Boulevard) 3. DONALD AND LOUISE DORAN, for a Change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/acre) Zoning District to the CO (Commercial, Office) zoning District to allow for the highest and best use of the property. (Location: East side of South 2Su Street, approximately 500 feet South of Midway Road) 4. PAUL J. DRISCOLL, for a Change in Zoning from the IX (Industrial, Extraction) zoning District to the AG-2.5 (Agricultural - 1 dU/2.5 acres) Zoning District to utilize the property for agricultural uses. (Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of Orange Avenue and pulitzer Road) 5. WAYNE SKINNER, for a Change in zoning from the AG-2.5 (Agricultural - 1 dU/2.5 acres) zoning District to the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to develop a convenience store, retail store specializing in feed, seed, agricultural accessories and retail western wear. (Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of Okeechobee Road and Eleven Mile Road) 6. W. D. WHITE, for a Change in Future Land Use Designation from RS (Residential Suburban) to COM (Commercial) to allow for the best use of the property. (Location: 7701 Indrio Road) v '-' 'wi ITEM NO. C-3B 7. W. D. WHITE, for a Change in zoning" from the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) and CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) zoning Districts to the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to allow for the best use of the property. (Location: 7701 Indrio Road) FUNDS AVAILABLE: Not Applicable. PREVIOUS ACTION: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board acknowledge the Public Hearing schedule for June 15, 1999. COMMISSION ACTION: [v(" APPROVED [ ] OTHER: DENIED ~norr'iinat:inn/~ign;::Jt:1Jr~s County Attorney: Mgt & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept: Other: Other: Finance: (copies only): - - - - ... .,-" '-' ~ o " COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: JUNE 1, 1999 CONSENT AGENDA MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: J~~~~n!ìmltý Development Director DATE: May 25,1999 SUBJECT: Advance Notice for Public Hearings It is requested that the Board of County Commissioners authorize the publication of the legal advertising for the following public hearings for June 15,1999, at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. The reasons given are those listed by the applicants on their respective petitions. 1. BROADMOOR ALZHEIMER'S AND MEMORY IMPAIRMENT CENTER, for a Change in Zoning from the RM-11 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 11 du/acre) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the expansion of an Adult Congregate Living Facility. (Location: 200 Dixielan~ Drive) 2. JAMES AND SHIRLEY CAGLE, for a Change in Zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single-Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the expansion of an existing Adult Congregate Living Facility. (Location: 5615 Oleander Boulevard) 3. DONALD AND LOUISE DORAN, for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/acre) Zoning District to the CO (Commercial, Office) Zoning District to allow for the highest and best use of the property. (Location: East side of South 25th Street, approximately 500 feet South of Midway Road) - - -... '-' ....., ~ May 25, 1999 Page 2 Subject: Advance Notice of Public Hearings 4. PAUL J. DRISCOLL, for a Change in Zoning from the IX (Industrial, Extraction) Zoning District to the AG-2.5 (Agricultural- 1 dul2.5 acres) Zoning District to utilize the property for agricultural uses. (Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of Orange Avenue and Pulitzer Road) 5. WAYNE SKINNER, for a Change in Zoning from the AG-2.5 (Agricultural - 1 dul2.S acres) Zoning District to the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to develop a convenience store, retail store specializing in feed, seed, agricultural accessories and retail western wear. (Location: Southeast corner of the intersection of Okeechobee Road and Eleven Mile Road) 6. W. D. WHITE, for a Change in Future Land Use Designation from RS (Residential Suburban) to COM (Commercial) to allow for the best use ofthe property. (Location: 7701 Indrio Road) 7. W. D. WHITE, for a Change in Zoning from the AG-1 (Agricultural- 1 dulacre) and CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning Districts to the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to allow for the best use of the property. (Location: 7701 Indrio Road) Please call me if you have any questions. JS/jrnr cc: County Administrator County Attorney File -~_. - - -,... ~ .....,¡ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-4k DATE: June 1,1999 "INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE" REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: ~;;~: ~:---- County Engineer SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: Engineering Construction Management Contract for Bridge Replacement at Orange Avenue and NSLRWCD Canal No. 57. Work Authorization NO.2 to the Agreement for Continuing Construction Management Services with Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari & Hellstrom, Inc. BACKGROUND: On June 17, 1997 the Board of County Commissioners approved an additional two cents of Local Option Gasoline Tax for St. Lucie County. The revenue from this additional tax is earmarked for capital maintenance of bridges and road reconstruction. A list of needed bridge repair and replacement projects was approved by the BOCC as part of the County's "Investment for the Future" Program. The Orange Avenue over C-57 Bridge is proposed for construction in 1999. The existing bridge will be replaced with a new 6' X 9' reinforced concrete box culvert. This will reduce the replacement cost by about $300,000 and will be easier and less expensive to maintain. The attached work authorization is for the construction management for the bridge replacement. The work includes preparation of the bid documents and contracts, inspection of the work for structural certification, and final certification of the work. The attached proposal is with Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari & Hellstrom, Inc., in the amount of $9,000.00. Funds are available in the capital budget under "Bridge Replacement and Repair," Account No. 316001- 41133-599330-4319. FUNDS AVAIL.: 316001-41133-599330-4319 PREVIOUS ACTION: September 9, 1997 - BOCC approved continuing services agreement for construction contract management with Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari & Hellstrom, Inc. April 6, 1999 - BOCC approved Work Authorization NO.1. Design plans and permits were prepared by Jenkins & Charland in the amount of $37,070. RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends approval of the attached engineering contract (Work Authorization No. 2 to the Agreement for Construction Contract Management with Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari & Hellstrom, Inc. for engineering services related to the Orange Avenue over C-57 Bridge Replacement in the amount of $9,000.00, and authorization for signature by the Chairman. .... SSION ACTION: '-" APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [x)County Attorney " <..Jr1// rI 11 \j/"-\. [x)Originating Dept. Public Works [ )Finance (check for copy only, if applicable) orang 57 [ ] DENIED /J '}. ijt y ¡../ ___ v ~ [x)~. & B/t [x)Co. Eng (~ [x)BudgetlRevenue [ )Other Ißfì\I <:. - \fl\ engineering · inspection · planning Brandon Office 9270 Bay Plaza Boulevard Suite 605 Tampa, Florida 33619 813/620·0088 Fax 813/621·8582 April 8, 1999 Mr. Donald West, P.E. Director of Engineering St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue, Room 321 Ft. Pierce, Florida 33301 , Œ ® ~ !1 ~" r: ¡ œ t'l Ie \! ".' t·, ,- n ' -,..- ¡-----...-. .-.' , I U l APR I L 1993 J ENGINtERií\G Subject: Bridge No. 940034 (CR 68 over Canal) ()R~~ A\J~N~ <YJe1:: c.. Sl ~Þ<L~ Dear Mr. West: Kisinger Campo and Associates Corp. (KCA) bridge inspectors have recently inspected the referenced structure and have found severe deficiencies in the timber and steel piling. Some of the timber pile have areas of decay and the steel piling of the crutch bent have up to 95% section loss. Also, settlement at Bent 5 has occurred in the past and should be monitored. These deficiencies have caused KCA to provide a poor rating for the Substructure Overall and Piling. The previous inspection reports have noted these deficiencies, but no apparent corrective action has been taken. We recommend immediate repair of the piling deficiencies that are itemized in the attached notes and photos. If you have any questions or need additional information, please call me. Sincerely, /1~ ~. J:;-- c._ /~ Ken C. Reinhold Project Manager KCR: lp 49904.010 cc: Jorge Encl. Martos, P.E. sh~ ~~~ awe ~~k+~. l)~)ð" by l-1Sfî..\. 1: ) ¿ do" ~\\-')~~ Ii sr-e'-" OW" '1\'1. u:l.~ . l,) Q. vn ~ -bs fGÇ.~. s~ ~'^~ ~Y"~ -Th Cfi'M ~ ho) ~ ~ ~~. Corporate Office 2203 N. Lois Avenue· Suite 1200 . Tampa, Fl33607 P.O. Box 25261 . Tampa, Fl33622-5261 Phone: 813/871-5331 . Fax: 813/871-5135 Visit our web site at www.kcaeng.com " ~ ....,.¡ C97 -09-202 WA#2 WORK AUTHORIZATION FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES RELATED To Construction Contract Administration Professional Services For BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AT ORANGE AVENUE AND NSLRWCD CANAL NO. 57 Pursuant to that certain Agreement between St. Lucie County "COUNTY" and Lindahl, Browning, Ferrari & Hellstrom, Inc. (LBFH) "ENGINEER" for Engineering Services "Agreement" (Contract No. C97-09-202), dated September 9, 1997, the ENGINEER agrees to provide the Scope of Services described in Exhibit "A" and for the compensation described in Exhibit B. All services provided under this Work Authorization shall be completed according to the schedule described in Exhibit C. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the COUNTY has hereunto subscribed and the ENGINEER has affixed his, its, or their names, or name, on the dates below. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: CHAIRMAN Date APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: By: 5/18/99 Date <' -~_._---.<> "~I /. ~..../:/.-".:.../~ _.._ - ~/'-1'~---/' /( j /¡j ;: . ?il&x if Vtv-~.wih~) i / I / ¡ -~- Print Nan1e: Marty E. Sanders, P.E. Vice President Page 10f5 51. Lucie Counly Orange AvelX5LRIVCD C5ï Alay 18. 1999 \ IFPIprojeels\9 5-004 4\B ¡d-Doe- W orkA ulhor-O I.doe " ~ ...,,; BRIDGE REPLACEMENT AT ORANGE A VENUE AND NSLRWCD CANAL NO. 57 EXHIBIT A SCOPE OF SERVICES The ENGINEER shall provide the following services for the project: GENERAL The ENGINEER shall perform the necessary work on an authorized basis as requested by the COUNTY. Generally, the ENGINEER's work shall include the preparation of the Bid Documents and the Contract Administration and Construction Services needed for the bidding and construction of the bridge replacement at Orange Avenue and North St. Lucie River Water Control District (NSLRWCD) Canal No. 57, St. Lucie County, Florida. Task 1. BID PACKAGE PREPARATION: The ENGINEER shall prepare and assemble documents required for contractor bidding including specifications, bid forms and addendums. The COUNTY shall provide Microsoft Word data files including standard verbiage and fonns required in the bid package. This effort is limited to one response to comments generated by COUNTY Staff. The ENGINEER shall provide 15 copies of the plans and bid documents to St. Lucie County for their distribution to prospective bidders and contractors.· The ENGINEER shall attend the pre-bid and bid opening meetings and shall prepare a tabulation of the bids received by the COUNTY and make recommendations as to the award of the construction contract. Task 2. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES: Task 2A. Attend a pre-construction meeting for the project in conjunction with the selected Contractor. Task 2B. Provide assistance as requested during construction up to 24 hours responding to contractor questions as requested by the County. Task 2C. Provide certification of project completion to appropriate governing agencies that shall include record drawings to be provided by the contractor. Ma)' 18.1999 \ IFPlprojects \ 95 -004 4\B id- Doc- W orkA uthor-O 1 . doc Page 2 of5 St. Lucie Count)' Orange Aw!!NSLRWCD C5ï -- - ;, "'-- \w/I ExmBIT B COMPENSATION TO THE ENGINEER For the services set forth in Exhibit A, the fee compensation to the ENGINEER shall be as follows. The tenn "Lump Sum " (L.S.) indicates that the tasks specified will be performed for a fixed fee. Task #rritle Amount of Compensation Type of Compensation Task 1. BID PACKAGE PREPARATION $5,000 Lump Sum Task 2. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES $4,000 Lump Sum Total Work Tasks land 2 S9,000 Special provisions: 1.) Title searches or reviews and construction stakeout are not a part of this scope. 2.) Does not include daily or random field observation. 3.) Construction plan revisions are not part of this scope. May /8, /999 \ \FPlprojects\9 5-004 4\B id-Doc- W orkA uthor-O /. doc Page 3 of5 51. Lucie County Orange AnýS5LRWCD C5ï '-- Task # / Title Task 1. BID PACKAGE PREP ARA TION Task 2. CONSTRUCTION SERVICES Special provisions: None. \ \fp\PROJECTS\9 5-0044\8 id-Doc- W orkAuthor-O I.doc May 18. 1999 \ IF Plprojeels\9 5 -0044\B ¡d-Doe- W orkA uthor-O J.doe ....." EXHIBIT C TIME SCHEDULE No. Calendar Days for Completion ·30 Days from Notice to Proceed. 90 Days from Contractor's Notice to Proceed. Page 4 of5 St. Lucie County Orange A,-elN5LRWCD C5ï . (¡,) - ~ .5 - '" ~ ,.... 10 o Z I'CI C I'CI Ü Q Ü ~ c::: ..J en z 'C C I'CI Q) ;:¡ c Q) > « Q) OJ C I'CI ... o - (¡,) t)J) '1: ::s ~ - () (¡,) ...... o ¡.. ø.. ..... I'CI ..... C Q) E Q) o I'CI ã. Q) c::: Q) OJ 'C .¡: ~ ale ü q en ..J 10 w en Q) ::E ::r:: r.. ~ ...:¡ Õ ë '" Æ "e >. Ü a.... CD !! c co E ::I o o C "C jjj - o c ~ E IU c- co .. a.. ë .Q ã. "§ '" o .. ,-,' ..!!¡;; ~ ~ f .. - " 1-.00 ã:= '" '" ." o '" ." o .... ." '" '" .. o .... ." o .., ." '" '" ." '" o ;; U ~ E ... Q) a. (¡j c .. I'CI ¡¡ ã: : ~ c I- " o :: :;:; c o ;:¡ ... Ii) c o Ü - .. ~§ Cw Co 0::0 00:: ;¡:o. 00 ß ~..... '" ." Co. ""w æQ: '" C L :!it; ~ .. .. ~ 0." "en '" ~~ ~ f "0 en o z w ¡ojo ~ joq"!"!:t Ñ !! tI't I ¡ ¡ o z w 0:: '" i i I"'¡~ ~ I i i I i I I I I I; 0 1a)1~ ~ I I I : ! I I I~ zl,g Q!¡ æ ~ ~ ~ ffi T"" ;! a.. "'" w III 0:: '" o.t- w Ie! I~ I~ ¡ I~ I~ ¡ :E a.. :I: C .>< .. .. I- o co g co oó ." o o ","'N8 ..- N..... tl)...¡ .. o It) ~ .,. I III II o "'It""'~ .. I I i , I I! i I I : 'I i<D ~I..,I~ ~I' ! I·... I I I 1 I <DI'" ~d!1 I ... I II ! ill II Ii II I 0111 '" a)N~~11 ¡ I I : ~ If' I ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~I : z 0) C I» ~ ~I ~ ~I! , ug-o NIG ~iljlg~l-! 8 ~ ~I~ 8 ocr: :: i!. ~ ~ I: :II~ .., "'.., i , ~I ~I I I o '" .. ~." I I ! ii, , I I II I : II I III' , ¡ III ¡ " ¡ I II ~I I I I I : IIII I .. .. IL .>< .. .. I- . I " on '" c.. N It) o o C) c£ YO o o It) YO ~ .... C) C> V .... V co o <X> V ..¡ .... o v v. .... .... N N o C> o. N YO f ::I to I~ I I I I I t- W (9 o :::J ro --' <{ t- O t- v. U C " :::2 ~ u v. ~ ë: ~ "" "" f?g: <n ~ ~~ c..<n '-.-- - '-' '-' "'I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-4B DATE: June 1, 1999 "INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE" REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 PRESENTED BY: þ~~.~ (Donald B. W t, P.E. County Engineer TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Award of Bid # 99-005, Construction Contract for Stormwater Ponds B, D, E & F for S. 25th St. Ph. 1 Widening (Edwards Road to Midway Road). BACKGROUND: On May 19, 1999, bids were opened for the S. 25th Street Phase I Retention Ponds. The lowest bidder, E & N Construction, Inc., of Boynton Beach has requested to have their bid rejected by St. Lucie County, due to an error in their bid. There is an urgency to complete the construction of the ponds prior to expiration of the SFWMD permit on November 9, 1999. We are recommending that the project not be rebid due to time constraints. FUNDS AVAIL.: 101006-4116-599330-4108: 101003-4113-599330-4108 PREVIOUS ACTION: Retention pond sites were purchased over the last fiscal year in preparation for construction of the pond improvements. Design plans were prepared for the road widening and pond construction started in 1989. The cost of preparing the plans, permits, and land acquisition is $820,538 to date. RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends awarding of Bid #99-055 to the next lowest bidder, Ranger Construction Co., in the amount of $333,948.00, establish the project budget as set forth in the attached memorandum, and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: [{APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED [x]County Attorney [x]Originating Dept. Public Works ~ pondsag.wpd ~. [x]Mgt. & Budget ~]Co.Eng~~ (x]BudgetlRevenue ~ f'\!j [x)Purchasing ¡~ß .. '-' ...., c ~ \-{ ('? DIVISION OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM 99-205 - - ---. - - - - - -- ---- --- - -- - -- - - --- - - - -- _. --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ---- - - - -- -- -- - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - - - ~ --- - - - -- -. - :~:~~:~=~:~=~:~=~:~=~:~=~:~~:~~:~=~:~=~:~=~:~=~:~~:~~:~~:~=~:~=~: ~~:~~:~=~:~=~:~=~:~~:~=~:~~:~=~:~~:~=~: ~~:~~:~=~:~~:~=~:~=~:~=~:~~:~=~:~=~: ~~:~=~:~=~:~~:~=~:~~:~~:~=~:~=~:~ - - - - - - - - - - ~ - -- - --- - -- - - - - - - -~-- - - - - - - --- - -- - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- TO: Charlie Bicht, Purchasing Director FROM: Ray Wazny, Public Works Director_ ~ ì ,f~ Gary Perdew, Budget Management ,/ ,,; Donald West, County Enginee~t\)\ May 26,1999 VIA: VIA: DATE: SUBJECT: Award of the Construction Contract for Stormwater Ponds B, 0, E & F for S. 25th Street Phase I Widening (Edwards Road to Midway Road) This project includes construction of four (4) of the stormwater retention ponds for the S. 25th Street Phase I Widening Project. Funds were budgeted in the 1988-1999 capital budget for acquisition of the pond sites and construction of the improvements. Bids were opened on May 19,1999. We have reviewed all five (5) of the bids received (see attached copy of spreadsheet) and found one error in Sheltra Construction Company bid. However, this inaccuracy does not have an effect on the final outcome of the low bidder. Sheltra has been notified of the discrepancy. The low bidder, E & N Construction of Boynton Beach, has requested to have their bid rejected by St. Lucie County (see attached letter dated May 24, 1999). The contractor claims that the proposal they submitted does not include removal of the earthen fill material from the pond sites. In the attached correspondence from E & N Construction, they have requested that the bid bond security not be invoked. Because á the urgency to complete the construction of the stormwater ponds prior to the expiration of the South Florida Water Management District permit on November 9,1999, we are recommending that the project not be rebid and be awarded to the second lowest bidder, Ranger Construction Co. Ranger Construction is a local and respected contractor who has had many successful projects with St. Lucie County in the past. E & N Construction and Ranger Construction base bids were $263,051 and $333,948, respectfully. The Ranger bid is well below the amount that St. Lucie County has budgeted for the project ($450,000 budgeted), and there will be no time delay if the second low bid is accepted now. It appears that no hardship would occur to St. Lucie County by the rejection of the E & N Construction bid. The project budget will be esta'trrshed as follows: "'" Construction Contract: Contract Testing Reserves Total $333,948.00 $ 1 0,000.00 $ 56.052.00 $400,000.00 Funds will be available in Account Nos. 1 01 006-4116-599330-41 08: 101003-4113-599330-4108 cc: County Administrator County Attorney Finance Director Budget Management Director Budget/Revenue Coordinator U2£þ '-" '-" LINDAHL, BROWNING, FERRARI & HELLSTROM, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS Re: Bid Recommendation for Stormwater Ponds B, D, E & Widening from Edwards Road to Midway Road HAND DELIVERED æ;Œ:~:~} li~ L-- L._ Er'('~~:.!~ :':,.-",,1""' '< '~ th-=Z5tÍ.!::-Strêet-- May 24, 1999 Don West, P. E. St. Lucie County Engineering 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5652 Dear Mr. West: Bids for the construction of Storm water Ponds B, D, E & F for South 25th Street Widening from Edwards Road to Midv.'ay Road were opened on May 19, 1999. We have reviewed all five of the bids receivec. Attached please find a spreadsheet for the base bid and alternate base bid. Additionally, there was a mathematical error in the bid submitted by Sheltra & Son Construction Company Inc. Sheltra & Son Construction Company Inc. submitted a base bid of $467,129.00 and an alternate base bid of $458,919.00. Upon a review ofthe submitted unit prices, the revised base bid and alternative base bid are $476,129.00 and $467,979.00, respectfully. A letter has been forwarded to Sheltra & Son Construction Company, Inc. notifying them of the discrepancy. We have contacted Estrella Maligsa, President of E & N Construction of Boynton Beach, the low bidder for the above referenced project. She indicated her company made a major error in estimating the Earthwork and Grading lump sum amount, and did not include disposal costs for any unsuitable material found during construction. In her attached correspondence, E & N Construction has requested their bid be rejected and the bid bond security not be invoked. Because of the urgency to complete the construction of the stormwater ponds prior to the expiration of the South Florida Water Management District permit on November 9, 1999, we are recommending that the project not be re-bided and be awarded to the second lowest bidder, Ranger Construction, and the low bidder, E & N Construction, be rejected. Ranger Construction is a local and respected contractor who has had many successful projects with St. Lucie County in the past. E & N Construction and Ranger Construction base bids were $263,051 and $333,948, respectfully. The Ranger bid is well below the amount that St. Lucie County has budgeted for the project, and there will be no time-loss if the second low bid is accepted now. It appears that no hardship would occur to St Lucie County by the rejection of the E & N Construction bid. If you should have any question or require additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me at (561) 461-2450. Sincerely, a~j~ Thomas L. Knott Client Service Manager TLK:KAG:kag cc: Charli~ApBbrol1fÀ<i!WtH\1§, SUITE 201, FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34950 . (561) 461-2450 . Fl\X (561) 465-1225 Enclosures httpf/www.lbfh.com . e-mail: info@lbfh.com \\FP\prl'lj..t'fC"\oa 1111L1.\Q;rI D~,..^...........nrl"t;^n .-Inr WEST PALM BEACH JUPITER STU,\RT rUin PIERU OKEECHOBEf ~ ::>:: -<: o 00 """,:>=¡;; t.T..~:;:I.I.Jtr. ~z;o.:~:;: t¡J~Q=Q Q~~ ~ <:: ¡.. 0 g: .. ~~~¡,¡;: VJ~Q ...:; ~o:<~¡:: oí;;~;"f- c.. <u ~~~:;~ ::: ;!j 0: ,.. ¡: <: ~¡.¡z ;0.. :;~o ~~~òu ~"'-= ~ 0= '" ::>:: "" fJ æ ~ ;t ~ ¡:: t ~ ~ ... 1;; <: !! 8 ë t: " z U ::> -' § ~ ~ .= ¡: ~~ Co iI1 !;; :r. c 0 " u u... Ž ::> " c -' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ T' ~u ~ g ",Ut: z ::> = a 8 [~ S :: I- ~ ~ e 0... Z ::> -' ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ri~ U t: z ::> -' z .~ ~ ~ ~ !;; :..; C 0 " u v... 7- ::> ~ ... ~ ~ ~ !~§ t: !!S '-' 808 ,. 8 8 0 8 ~~~~~~~ª 81\8 ,. 8 8 1\ 8 ~~ª~~§~~. ~ti~~~~~~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 § § § § § § ~ § a ~ ~ ~ a a ã ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ § § § ~ § ~ § ~~~~EfE!ã", 88888888 ~~~~g~gg ~zi~;i:i;;ãá 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3gg~g~gg a~zi~:i;i~å 88888888 ª.>:)§.~~§o-0 ",az;:iS~~~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ª~§.~~§~~ ~"';;~s;£~s 88888888 g~~.g~..;!~ ~ ;i ;; ~ á ;;... 88888888 ~ä~Iª~I~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~â~;!~~~ 88888888 ~ â ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ;;¡ ;;¡...... 8 888 8 8 8 8 §§~gg~gg åá;;~á~ã~ 88888888 ~~~I~~!~ ... ~ ~~~~~~~~ ¡: " -------- ~ :; ¡e ;:. ð: "" ð g ¡N;;;~~~'O~ ~~a~t;i~t; ~ ~ ä ~ ¡>¡ 2 ,.. i g Ii :1 ¡;¡ Š ~ :::: g ~ ~ :::: 0 ~ 1!. g :; : ¡;i 0 ~;xa~aa~ :: :: 8 1\ ¡¡ :: 0 f.~~;:¡â~~ :;a ~ ri ti t;; ;i ~ 8 8 8 8 888 §§o§§~.§ ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ;;¡ ~ 8 8 8 888 8 § § 0 § § ~ § ~ ~ ;; ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 8 8 888 ~",~§~8~§ .. t:t ti ::i ï á à 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 $( 8 $( g aatiaiaâ 888 ;:: 2~NN· 8 ; ~ ~ i ~ ã ~ ~ g 8 8: f'- :q ;: § .c ~ ¡:: g z: d ;X $ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ ~ g ~ ~ ~ ~ Må;i~~;it{ 8 8 8 8 888 ~~g~.!~~ "" "" '" a;;... '" 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~¡d~§~$ ;; ~ ~ ti ti ~ ::i 8 888 8 8 8 ~ ~ § § § ~ $ ;; ;i ti ti ti ~ ~ 8 8 8 8 888 ~!~ii~å 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 5~!ii~å ~ ,1j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o N - ------- !! 8 8 ! ~ ~ á :i t;f !! 8 8 ! ~ ~ á ~ ... 888 § § § 5 S ~ 888 § § § å ; ~ 888 ~ g ~ ;i :i ti 888 ~ g ~ ... :i ti 088 ! ~ ~. ..... ;; ;; 088 ~ 0 ~, ~ zi ;; 888 g. i g. a ¡:¡ 888 ~ i ! 888 o g ~ æ ~ 888 ; §, ~ ;; ;; 888 g g g ~ S;; ;i 888 ~ g. ~ ¡;; ¡;; ¡:¡ ~ ~ ~ £-0 8 f ] j ð ~ ~~ ~Jiv' :;'v.;h ~ e ~_c :.; ~l< ::;¿~ ;)5~¡¡ 0 lLd~ ~ ~i t]ï1];~~1 ~~~r "._3_ 0 = ~ = = ".E ! ~ ~ $ u ~ ~ 1 1 1 1 ! 1 ~ 1 j ~ ~ C~s-! ~~'_NNVUU,"U u;"="~ ~1.. ~ ~ðGJÆi = -~« 88888888 §~~~o:q~ .., ~ a ;t '9. ~ 88888888 O~;~~~ ~ :;:" 88888888 ~~~~~~äã 8.8888888 ....~~..~~~~~..~ ~ ; Ï $00ì€ 08 ;:¡ ~-E~~. ~~::;¡a~~ ;;; ð 0 !: ;!. 8 ;x 8 ;; ~ ;;; "" "" "" 2 88888888 ~g~§5\~=.d88 :-¡gåi..~~a 88888888 ã~!P~~~i ;8~~~~~~ ~ ,¿ 0 . a ~~å~~;X 88888888 o $ "" ~... ~ 88888888 §g~~ª~i¡¡ ~æ~ti:i;; ~ !!~~~~~i ( " ~ ~ ~ :J :J :J ~ o ª _ ~ - Ie ~ ~ t '-' ~ ~ U ~ ~ ~ l l ~ ~ 1 : ~ ~ '-' '-' ~ ] :¡: ~ ~ ~ "~ < x c Q ..¿ ~ = ~ ....., ~I ¡:¡ II ~I ~ il 81 !. a II ~·I ~ '" := ... ~ ~ <:: ;¡ = ¡.. ~ ~ ..J ~ UJ '" 6 ¡¡; -~ .U;¡'/~4/BB , " - ..... 09:10 F~X 0000000000 '-" xxx I4J 002 ....., E & N'CONSTRUCTION, INC.. P.O. èox 3023 BOYNTON BEACH, FL 33424 661-736-7444 FAX ð!1·736-0144 May 241 1SSS St. Lucltl Board of CommlŒlol1ets 2300 VirgInia Avenue Ft. Ple/'f:e, FL 34982 Re: ~/d #99-065 Stormwater Pond~ B D IE & F For South 25th S~et Widening From Edwards Road To MIdway Roed Dear SJÆ: E 0. N CQnstructlon, Jnc ¡., htlreby reqUfntlng tQ lV]ect our bId Qn the above captioned project . The erronf o~ bId W8$ due to Qur mJaca/cu/etJon haulIng off the wet flll mstêrlal and the tIme dUl'8tJon of the contract. If granted on th/$ request we also ask your office not to forfeit the bid bond. PIf1asé adV/~d. SlncfJ~/y. \.. a, P/e$. · . U2£þ '-" ....., LINDAHL, BROWNING, FERRARI & HELLSTROM, INC. CONSULTING ENGINEERS, SURVEYORS & MAPPERS May 24, 1999 Vincent Gorham Project Manager Sheltra & Son Construction Company Inc. P.O. Box 336 Indiantown, FL 34956 Re: Bid Submittal for Stormwater Ponds B, D, E & F for South 25th Street Widening from Edwards Road to Midway Road Dear Mr. Gorham: We have reviewed the base bid and alternative base bid submitted by Sheltra & Son Construction Company Incorporated and have found a mathematical error. The base bid and alternate base bid submitted was $467,129.00 and $458,919.00, respectfully. Upon review of the submitted unit prices, the revised base bid is $476,129.00 and the alternative base bid is $467,979.00. This inaccuracy does not have an affect on the final outcome ofthe low bidder. Please review your records and if you have any questions, please contact me at (561) 461-2450. Sincerely, ~jÜ7 Thomas L. Knott Client Service Manager TLK:KAG:kag cc: Don West, P.E. P:\99-0 114\Sheltra-Re\'BidAmt.doc 2222 COLONIAL ROAD. SUITE 201, FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34950 . (561) 461-2450' FAX (561) 465-1225 http://www.lbfh.com . e-mail: info@lbfh.com WEST PALM BEACH JUPITER STUART FORT PIERCE OKEECHOBEE - .......- '-" ....., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C- 5 DATE: June 1, 1999 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: OMB PRESENTED BY: Harvey M. Lincoln -' SUBJECT: Budget resolution appropriating funds for a pass-thru grant to the Fire District awarded by the Florida Department of Health. BACKGROUND: Application for the Emergency Medical Services grant was signed by the St. Lucie County BOCC on 4/22/99. On 5/21/99 we received a check representing the actual award in the amount of $77,147.12. Funds will be forwarded to the Fire District. FUNDS AVAILABLE: 104-2610-581060-2950 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Budget Resolution 99-117 establishing the budget for the Emergency Medical Services grant. [~PPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: XX Ch ¡/~ Coordination/Signatures . Management & Budget ~"'rurchaSing: Public Works: '-6ther: Originating Dept: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX .. '-' ....., (2.-? RESOLUTION NO. 99-117 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners budget for St. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have become available from the Florida Department of Health for the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) County Grant. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 1s1 day of June, 1999, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 1998-99, and the County's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 104-2610-334290-2950 HRS - Public Safety $77,148 APPROPRIATIONS 104-2610-581060-2950 Fire District $77,148 After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner John D. Bruhn Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 1ST DAY OF JUNE, 1999. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY r;.r, ,\h,.~"...t\,,·....\ .,,,...,,~., '<:\.,r.."'n~..,OO\("·1 f.";r"n;-:trÍrt Gr:'lnt \\T\rt - ._~. - 'c- ~ r, U ~i I {)./,..-/ é.../ ,( <../ \J v' , . }.-C; ~/oŸ '-' .,. FLORIDA DEPARTMENr' OF Robert G. Brooks. M.D. Secretary Jeb Bush Governor ST. LUCIE COUNTY F!¡-iÞ.~!CE OEPA.rn~UH HEAL T 59 ¡iù,i 20 PM 4:00REAU OF EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES April 29, 1999 .1 St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 c \ \7 (/ .-- '.~ c.ë..: DO LL, ItdJn/n. A+tvr/1Qtr fu.bI: G )4-hfy Dear Chairman: It gives me great pleasure to inform you that St. Lucie County has received an Emergency Medical Services (EMS) County Grant in the amount of $77,147.12. The grant number is C9859. The grant is for the purchase of the prehospital activities, services, and other items contained in the grant application submitted to us by the Board. The grant began on April 28, 1999 and ends on September 30,1999. You must submit expenditure reports so that they arrive at the Bureau by August 27 and October 29, 1999. The final expenditure and activity report must be submitted no later than December 3, 1999. The quarterly reports must be submitted on the form on page three (3) of Appendix F of the "Florida EMS County Grant Program Manual." You acknowledge acceptance of the grant terms and conditions when you draw or otherwise obtain funds from the grant payment system. Your signed grant application on file with us acknowledges that you have read, understand and will comply fully with Appendix 0 of the "Florida EMS County Grant Program Manual, January 1998," by the Depart~ent of Health. . You must execute this grant within the limits of the amount awarded to you. Any costs above the grant amount that we award in accordance with paragraph 401.113(2)(a), Florida Statutes, is the sole responsibility of the county. Thank you for your continued support and involvement in improving and expanding the prehospital EMS system. Please contact Ed Wilson at the Bureau if you have any questions or need assistance. DJV/ew/hp cc: Donna Beach Attachment: Approved County Award Application .. Phone (850) 487-1911 FAX (850) 488-2512 or 487-2911 2002-0 Old St. Aueustine Road. TJlIah:l5See. FL 32301-4RRl .' ~~,'_.:;~.'~:.,_,~:-.:.)~.:~:~.~,"~,~~_.i<,:;.:~,;':f.;~,~~~:~~~-~c"."-". C '.~-" ,...~~~.- - . - .- .". _.-="_-.:i...;.,._~.-:.":-:1:''''··.~:-;:~':~--;-;;~:::''~~~· :-~ ~_~~-:.-:::::;~:::;:-~~~~X~:.:r.~~ _C'...?: :'r:~'::- ......J - . .. STATE OF F-LORIDA 4- 29 006 18 . OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER REMITT ANCE ADVICE THIS IS NOT A PAYMENT DEV: .- SAMAS ACCOUNT CODE OLD SITE DOCUMENT NUMBER OBJECT DATE PAYMENT 64-202192002-64200000-00-05999800 ó40000 80 D9000696287 7300 05/14/99 24056 J PAYMENT AMOUNT $ 77,147.12 DO NOT CASH 1,,11'11'111,1,,1,,11,,1,1,111. ,11"1,111,,11111,1,11,,,1, t 1,1 ST LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY CO~ISSIONERS 2300 VIRGINIA AVE FORT PIERCE FL 34982 AGENCY DOCUMENT NO V030864 PLEASE DIRECT QUESTIONS TO: (850) 414-1266. HQ. ACCOUNTING - MIKE GRIFFIN INVOICE NUMBER AMOUNT ,- 'i'fP o';;:JfP 'cO \ct\' 0 \..0 ~, \..:J :::: ~f") -:>.. >;-i ::;:::. -r -< ~c: N . 0 0- ¡-T1r:1 ;po ::?o ':----0 -"- ~c: - -:- -- "':"--1 ~-< .' N CO ~ --I --------- ---------------- C9859 $ 77,147.12 DETACH CAREFULLY ANO RETAIN FOR YOUR RECORDS BEFORE CASHING OR DEPOSITING THE WARRANT ~ 1. " J. _.0: ~...~ . :;...;: .' .;: ...: _..' ..:. - ."-'1." :;..;;: - , '. .....:-:--!:-r-~-::: , .- ..-::;:;;::.~.;: - , DOCUMENT NO. OBJECT DATE WARRANT NO 53-59 D9000696287 7300 05/14/99 2405610 530 SAMAS ACCOUNT CODE 64-202192002-64200000-00-05999800 STATE OF FLORIDA OFFICE OF COMPTROLLER VOID AFTER 12 MONTH! 4- 29 006 1 f AMOUN" ; 11****77,147. j SEVENTY-SEVEN-THOUSANO-ONE-HUNORED-FORTY-SEVEN & 12/100 DOLLARS ., - . -- . ~""'.:.........:-..'. .:-".<-;~.:....,. -. :--."::: -'J.-..:. v~ ..--_.~_._. '-:::':"~~.~ 'r;1 EXPENSE.~ WARRAN - ',"' '.. - ...._, ;:i~:..:gR~~ ¿: _ .', : . ';.' " .. -. .. ~ .....;...~...--.. ~...~ -.." ~~;-'.-.-"~::-:'""~""'~~"-"""',:"":';":";"'--'-" ~~-_... .'-." -- .-.---._---- -.. ,,,-, ¡-:!,-:--:~ ~??UCA nON (REqui.Signa ture) v . ,c¿EQUEST FOR~ÇS:UN_-çr GPJ.NI OISTRIBUTlOI;J.A~VANCE FA YMENT) CJLRG_NCY MLOICAL SE.~V'C_:J (_MS) COUNTY GRANT PROGP..AM In a~rcônce wiíh ::-,e ;r.J'.I'-sicns c{ sec-:ion 401,112(2)(2), FS, ine :;ncersicnec her;:::;'.¡ req:;ests ôn ¿!.is c-:;un....¡ çrar.í CiSi,-;btr.ion (aCYênœ palmer.:) .'0. the im;x'O:'ement a:ïé e~par.s¡cn of Vehospr.al E.MS, ~ ~- ....'aymen¡ 10.' St. LLicie County Board of Countv Commissioners .". Name CÇJfboaro Oi Goum! GC"u'ì1/SSioners (,~a!55J 2300 Virainia Avenue Address :"~ :.~ 'f ,-.~ Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 (Ctry) (Stare) (Z1p) '..Ll ~ :l. Federal Tax 10 Number of co 1.;r;ty: 3- -L -L o o o 8 .. 3 ~ '..:J . '. '. . .." :> -< I W :::.::: o CJ ~ :J1 ,;- 4 j SIGNATURE: I '/1 j/¡¿ ) 1 ~ ,./~::, ,-' :- ~:::,-.,:,::>.:~:.., Date: <¡Iv'> ')7ð.Ó-~ '1 11 '-( /1 ~~ (/ ;;~?).c' /1/1/ -:--:.... ._~ ~:: .": ---,-VV\, -4~','i _ .pftfL/1l- ,i) _ ~lJ ~- ~'~ä:/~ _:\/;(1 ¿ C}W.-IffhOAÎ §; ~' I SIGN AND RETURN WITH YOUR GRANT APPUCATlON ~9~ .",,," ," ;" >::.J ;1\ \ $,. ~ ...... c~-v \ -.:,.. .; ~. " ~'\' Ï'_ -rt e C· of Heal tn' .....r:: ...."'-_...'".,,~_.~_._....J Lr.::[)C lm n. --..__...... =<,.~.; ¡-~;"\~~~~~; ¡ ".'-:' '.' Bureau of Emeroency Medical Serviéês'-:-:·:~,\::,;-¡:. .~.... ....J:__.~.., .. ~-_. ~ EMS County Grants /' '~'. . ;~',:> .', : ":::";';::_ Cf2 00 00 20020 Old St. A,!gustine R(;;"ad ...., ----, " 3'~o" .' > :'C" :';,oo'V·O,j ~~= Tallahassee, Flonda 32301ë,4S81 cç. ac '. .-4:3¡:~: .i \' (::·T~·:.~:~;~·{ 'I 30e:' "'."'ccj~, APPro',rO ,~ê~r Use Only by Departme~t ~f;H~~~&~)!jtJr:jl}~:; ,Ì; ~ . Bureau of Emergency Medical S~~i~~~ Amount: S {( / I Lt f, I d.... _ Grant Number: C. q g scr :~.--;-:~' ~': ;',\ 0 Approved By: QL'J<:':-,-f2~e ~- tJ ",,:~7 Date '-j / ;:l.. 'i /"19 ;:;lgnc::.H_, ,-l:::::::; ..:.M...tt:!}!f¡¡=cfmœr I Authorizing County Official -- - ... " - Pdnéed Name: Cc:: o ! --. .. ~ ~ j ~ .j Fiscal Year: c¡ ~ Ie¡ q ) AmountS" -:-:'Y'-¡Lf {, J ~ "I I Oroanization Code E. O. 64-25-60-00-000 B u Federal Tax 1.0. V F .:l.5....b 0 0 QK..3 S- ( 00 J) Beginning Date: Lf / r:l... ý I 9 CZ / I Obiect Code 730060 Ending Date: ~/ =?)Þ9 ~ AGENDA REQUEST '1:EM NO. C ~ DATE: June 1, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] TO: Board of County Commissioners PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT):County Attorney Heather Young Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: 3904 and 3926 N. Kings Highway (Parcels 43 and44) - Termination of Lease Agreement with Don Wayne Clark and Permission to Advertise Parcel 44 for Lease BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum CA 99-643 FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/ A Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners terminate the lease agreement with Don Wayne Clark. Staff requests permission to advertise Parcel 44 located at 3904 N. Kings Highway for lease. RECOMMENDA nON: Douglas Anders Co CE: COMMISSION ACTION: ~PPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: i~ ( " Review and Approvals Management & Budget: (1', r pc'" t D~" Other: r / Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable): _ '- '-" ~-LP \. INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 99-643 DATE: May 19, 1999 SUBJECT: 3904 and 3926 N. Kings Highway (Parcels 43 and 44) - Termination of Lease Agreement with Don Wayne Clark and Permission to Advertise Parcel 44 for Lease BACKGROUND: On March 1, 1998, the County entered into a lease agreement with Don Wayne Clark for approximately 7.56 acres located at 3904 and 3926 N. Kings Highway (Parcels 43 and 44) for a monthly rental rate of seven hundred and 00/100 dollars ($700.00) per month. Mr. Clark's bid far exceeded the minimum bid requirement of one thousand one hundred thirty-four and 00/100 dollars ($1,134.00) which was based upon the condition of the property and the fair market rental value for agricultural property used for vegetable production. Mr. Clark intended to use the property for vegetable production and an accessory produce stand. The property had been vacant for some time and Mr. Clark proposed a number of improvements necessary for his use of the property. These were incorporated as rent credits in the amount of four thousand two hundred forty and 00/100 dollars ($4,240.00) under the lease. Although Mr. Clark paid his security deposit in the amount of seven hundred and 001100 dollars ($700.00), he left the area shortly thereafter and made no additional payments and little if any improvements to the property. He did contact staff on one occasion regarding the lease to request additional time in order to obtain fmancing for his operation but did not follow up on his proposal. Subsequent efforts to locate him proved unsuccessful and notices of default were returned as undeliverable. As Mr. Clark has apparently abandoned the lease, staff is recommending that the lease be terminated. Nancy Hamilton recently contacted staff regarding a possible lease of Parcel 44 for a flower farm with accessory wholesale and retail sales. The property is located at 3904 N. Kings Highway (Parcel 44) and contains approximately 2.16 acres. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners terminate the lease agreement with Don Wayne Clark. Staff requests permission to advertise Parcel 44 located at 3904 N. Kings Highway for lease. l HY/ Copies to: '-- ....." Respectfully submitted, '-~ ð-;y- Heather Young Assistant County Attorney County Administrator Airport Director .- .... AGENDA REQUEST ....." ITEM NO. C . tt DATE: 06/01/99 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT be] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Leisure Services Parks Division Subiect: To swap the grounds maintenance and jurisdiction of Martin Luther King Jr./Dreamland Park, now under city maintenance, and Indian River Memorial Park, now under County maintenance. BACKGROUND: Leisure Services Parks Division is requesting that St. Lucie County and the City of Ft. Pierce swap grounds maintenance of Martin Luther King Jr./Dreamland Park and Indian River Veterans Memorial Park. The County would assume maintenance and jurisdiction of Martin Luther King Jr./Dreamland Park, and the City would assume grounds maintenance of Indian River Veterans Park. This is the second phase of the park swaps between St. Lucie county and the City of Ft. Pierce. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A COMMISSION ACTION: r,,( APPROVED [] DENIED Y] OTHER: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant approval for the swap of Martin Luther King Jr./Dreamland Park, presently maintained by the City, and Indian River Memorial Veterans Park, presently maintained by the County, with the City of Fort Pierce. Staff also recommends that the County attorneys office draft and execute the appropriate inter local agreement between the City of Fort Pierce and St. Lucie County. C NCURRE RECOMMENDATION: Do A erson Coun Administrator ~~~~~ Originating Dept: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Coordination/Sianatures Mgt & Budget Purchasing Mgr.: Other: Other: Eft. 1/97 B. \WP\UQUEST$\PAUS1I1'· WPD " ! I J ~ 'wftJ ~ --¡ DEPARTMENT OF LEISURE SERVICES MEMORANDUM TO: Doug Anderson, County Administrator DATE: 5/24/98 ~ FROM: Jack Doughney, Director, Leisure Service SUBJECT: Park Swap - Phase II ***************************************************************** Negotiations between the City of Ft. Pierce Leisure Services have concluded. The recommendation of this department. , and St. Lucie County following is the St. Lucie County and the City of Ft. Pierce swap the maintenance and jurisdiction of Martin Luther King, Jr. /Dreamland Park the ground maintenance of Indian River Veteran's Memorial Park. This swap would provide St. Lucie County with better recreational use of Dreamland Park due to it's close proximity to Elks Park. It would also give the City of Ft. Pierce total responsibility for green landscapes of the entire Downtown Ft. Pierce area. Attached is the associated costs of the maintenance of both parks. Should you need any further information please feel free to contact me at extension 1512. ,. JED/km Attachments '- ...." ST LUCIE COUNTY & CITY OF FORT PIERCE PARK SWAP ADril 23. 1999 I SERVICES PERFORMED 1# OF SERVICJ:NGS I ANNUAL COST I I Mowing I 42, 52, 26 I $15,508.98 I Landscape Maintenance 42, 1, 12, 12 $24,317.84 Tree Trimming 1 $ 4,518.20 Fertilizing , 2 $ 1,612.52 Litter Control Trash Removal 104 $ 7,502.40 Restrooms 104 $ 738.3), Clean &: Paint Fountain 2, 1 $ 836.88 í , I Pressure Clean Boat Ramp I 4 I $ 3120161 ~ TOTAL: $55,347.28 INDIAN RIVER VETERAN'S MEMORIAL PARK h: \wp\irvmp --.., ...." INDIAN RIVER VETERAN'S MEMORIAL PARK SERVICE PERFORMED . COST PR NUMBER ANNUAL SERVICE SERVICES COST $369.26 Avg 42 $15,508.98 (42,52,26 ) pr hour Mowing: (grounds, hill, fountain) Hours pr visit (8.0, 2.0,1.0) (2) operators @ $14.67 & $13.51 (1) employee @ $7.75 pr hour (2) mowers @ $2.00 pr hour (1) truck @ $5.00 pr hour (1) truck & trailer @ $6.00 pr hour Small tools @ $1.00 pr hour Landsca'Ç)e Maintenance: (42,~,~2,~2) $24,317.84 (water,mulch,hedges, herbicide) Hours per visit (12.0 wk, 40.0, 40.0,12.0) (1) operator @ $15.50 (4) employees @ $14.67, $13.51, $13.11, $7.75 pr hour (watering 1, mulch 4, hedges 2, herbicide 1) (2) trucks @ $5.00 pr hour (1) flatbed @ $7.00 pr hoúr (1) utility cart with sprayer @ $3.00 pr hour Small tools @ $1.00 pr hour Chemicals $528.00 Mulch 100 yds @ $14.00 pr yd Tree Trimming: $4,518.20 Hours per visit 116 brs (2) operators @ $10.42 & $10.03 pr hour (1) truck & chipper @ $18.00 pr hour Small tools @ $1.00 pr hr 1 $ 4,518.20 Fertilizing: Hours per visit 11.0 (2) opera~ors @ $15.50'& $14.16 pr hour (2) employees @ $13.51 & $7.75 pr hour (1) truck @ $5.00 pr hour (1) flatbed truck @ $7.00 pr hour ( 1) tractor wi th spreader @ $ 9 . 0.0 pr hour Fertilizer $918.40 f $ 806.26 2 $ 1,612.52 '-w. ..., Litter & Trash Removal: $ 72.13 104 $ 7,502.40 Hours per visit (2.0 & .50 ) (2 ) employees @ $15.50 & $14.16 per hour (2 ) employees @ $13.51 & $7.75 per hour (1) truck @ $5.00 per h~ur (1) flatbed truck @ $7.00 per hour Supplies $134.00 Restrooms: $ 7.09 104 $ 738.30 Hours per visit .50 (1) employee @ $7.73 pr hour (1) truck @ $5.00 per hour Supplies $76.34 Clean & Paint Fountains: 2,1 $ 836.88 Hours per visit 8.0 & 8.0 (2 ) employees @ $13.12 & $7.75 pr hour (1) truck @ $5.00 pr hour Small tools @ $1.00 pr hour (10) gals gas @ $2.00 pr gal Paint $200 Pressure Clean Boat R~: $ 78.04 4 $ 312.16 Hours per visit 4.0 (1) employee @ $13.51 pr hour (1) truck @ $5.00 per hour Small tools @ $1.00 pr hour TOTAL: S55.347.28 ... - ! SUN.t ~ ~ ~, '" ¡.. ... . '. eft .' ...."" ~ITY ~f ~RT PHR~~ loriJa PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT P.O. BOX 1480/ FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34954 DREAMLAND PARK SERVICES PERFORMED NUMBER OF ANNUAL COST SERVICINGS MOWING 27 $10,800.00 LANDSCAPING 16 $ 8,248.32 TREE TRIMMING 2 $ 3,200.00 FERTILIZER 3 $ 3,156.00 LITTER CONTROL & TRASH REMOVAL 356 $ 9,940.00 RESTROOMS AND COURTS 260 $ 3,770.00 BALLFIELD MAINTENANCE 24 $ 3,552.00 BALLFIELD RENOVATION 1 $ 8,040~00 IRRIGATION 96 $ 3,360.00 TOTAL $54,066.32 ..