The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 02-15-00 '-' FEBRUARY 15, 2000 7:00 PM "wI1 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARlNGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, Fla. 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-" ....", ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 www.stlucieco.gov AGENDA February 15, 2000 7:00 P.M. Il'I'VOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 8, 2000. /1ppfðl'etß. 2. PROCLAMATIONIPRESENTATION Resolution No. 00-47- Proclaiming the week of February 20, 2000 through February 26, 2000 as "Engineer's Week" in St. Lucie County, Florida. ..fJ¡prÒf\ed. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA /j¡pt;V'tJ 5. PUBLIC WORKSIENGINEERING /\ (A.) ;\,---~/ Taylor Creek /C25 Canal Restoration Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the design contract with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner / BCI Engineers & Scientists (Work Authorization No. 13) for the Taylor CreeklC25 Restoration Project, authorize the Chairman to sign the contract and approve the project budget as outlined.mtD Uý.wd 'r(p, 9ó{). ApP(Ò~ ~ .5-0 l B. Tozour Road Mine - Consider staff recommendation to approve the revised setbacks (. 0 pJ-1'1I ~ along the south and west boundary of the mine, approve the substitution of pond ~ 4 I{ t c('ß{(t l~ cypress for assorted vegetation in the littoral zone planting plan, approve closure of the ~ ,.At, v ~ ftC~ Tozour Road Mine and approve the release of the $30,935 bond (letter of credit) in ()}.I'll 'j}CflV ð¡(>f ¡).~ favor of Frank Stewart Truc~nç, Inc. Thisitem has been re-agendaed fropt February O ~(Di- ¡IJ,ùtfO" J 8, 2000. CðflSLdtr túnf ~ ~ l1Jð r /0 dl'JO ~ ~ do/lalee£ kj µt; W it> WI (l~ ð1P skøti.rt. Q;ð~t~~(~ ¡Jpp¡Ovv [~~,,/ ¥þXJ C!!iz~::~ '()~{1£11'. - NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to app.eal any action taken by the Board at tHese meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may neeä to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the reç¡uest of any party to the proceedings. mdividuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedmgs will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any indivlaual testi1Ying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability reçuirin~ accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462:t 777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. ....., ...., REGULAR AGENDA FEBRUARY 15, 2000 PAGE TWO 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY Indrio North Savannas / Stewart Parcel- Staff requests that the Board determine if they will accept the Option Agreement for the Stewart Parcel. If accepted, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct staff to close J1le transaction and record the docu~nt in the Public Recorj4of St. .r.pcie County, Florida.( ~6trz1J N>5 o!lIsSt5>«1 va. 1iP-) rJlJfðVl!tLsühjecffD fi!r IJwrora.L - Jf-o (/bd/YlUJ úf/ ¿k-) ADMINIST TION ~- a 7. Historical White City House - Staff requests the Board's directive on relocating the house to ~:;;d~erty. Væ~ 3-1 (tfuJcfwv;ðW hò \ 'Ii r'V (b~s 6.hs..ent' ) V{LLU,e./ bid proc-cs.s ~(~ L~. &lcx::£<k.Av CO(N-r .ðf ~ÔffIfJ «rJ¡ I 13omJcf1j;¿;;:¡flI ~~~ . tWf%~~ --- '-' ""'" CONSENT AGENDA Februarv 15. 2000 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 20 2. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Contract Amendment - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Second Amendment to the contract with Avatar Utility Services, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to sign the amendment. B. Amendment to Interlocal Agreement / St. Lucie County Sports Complex Security - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Third Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Port St. Lucie for traffic control and security at the St. Lucie County Sports Complex and authorize the Chairman to sign the amendment. C. Indrio North Savannas Project / Schroepfer Parcel 198 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the option agreement for the parcel, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct staffto close the transaction and record the document in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 3. LIBRAFtY St. Lucie West Library / Contracted Services - Consider staff recommendation to approve the expenditure of $82,400 for contracted services through Indian River Community College for St. Lucie West Library. 4. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Budget Amendment No. 00-114 / Equipment Request No. 00-201 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment and equipment request to update (2) two computer monitors for the South County Judicial office computers. -' r '-' FEBRUARY 15, 2000 7:00 PM ...", -- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT-Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETlNGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, Fla. 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. , ~ ...." ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMI5SIONER5 John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 www.stlucieco.gov AGENDA February 15, 2000 7:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held February 8, 2000. 2. PROCLAMA TIONIPRESENT A TION Resolution No. 00-47- Proclaiming the week of February 20, 2000 through February 26, 2000 as "Engineer's Week" in St. Lucie County, Florida. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA 5. PUBLIC WORKSIENGINEERING (-Â Taylor Creek /C25 Canal Restoration Project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the design contract with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner / BCI Engineers & Scientists (Work Authorization No. 13) for the Taylor CreeklC25 Restoration Proj ect, authorize the Chairman to sign the contract and approve the project budget as outlined. B. Tozour Road Mine _ Consider staff recommendation to approve the revised setbacks along the south and west boundary of the mine, approve the substitution of pond cypress for assorted vegetation in the littoral zone planting plan, approve closure ofthe Tozour Road Mine and approve the release of the $30,935 bond (letter of credit) in favor of Frank Stewart Trucking, Inc. Thisitem has been re-agendaed from February 8, 2000. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to app.eal any action taken by the Board at tHese meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may neeä to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the reç¡uest of any party to the proceedings. mdividuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedmgs will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any indivlaual testi!ying during a hearing upon request. Any'one with a disaòility. re!1uirin~ accommodation to attend thIs meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462=1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. '-' ...., REGULAR AGENDA FEBRUARY 15, 2000 PAGE TWO 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY Indrio North Savannas / Stewart Parcel- Staff requests that the Board determine if they will accept the Option Agreement for the Stewart Parcel. If accepted, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct staffto close the transaction and record the document in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 7. ADMINISTRATION Historical White City House - Staff requests the Board's directive on relocating the house to County property. '-" ...." CONSENT AGENDA Februarv 15. 2000 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 20 2. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Contract Amendment - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Second Amendment to the contract with Avatar Utility Services, Inc. and authorize the Chairman to sign the amendment. B. Amendment to Interlocal Agreement / St. Lucie County Sports Complex Security - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Third Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Port St. Lucie for traffic control and security at the St. Lucie County Sports Complex and authorize the Chairman to sign the amendment. C. Indrio North Savannas Project / Schroepfer Parcel 198 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the option agreement for the parcel, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct staffto close the transaction and record the document in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 3. LIIJRAIlY St. Lucie West Library / Contracted Services - Consider staff recommendation to approve the expenditure of $82,400 for contracted services through Indian River Community College for St. Lucie West Library. 4. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Budget Amendment No. 00-114 / Equipment Ilequest No. 00-201 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment and equipment request to update (2) two computer monitors for the South County Judicial office computers. '-' ...., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: February 8, 2000 Tape: 1,2 Convened: 9:00 a.m. Adjourned: 10:50 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chainnan, John D. Bruhn, Frannie Hutchinson, Paula A. Lewis, Cliff Barnes, Doug Coward Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator; Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Diféctor, Mike Leeds, Leisure Services Director, Bill Blazak, Utilities Director, Jim David, Mosquito Control Director; Hank DuFour, Human Resources Director, Harvey Lincoln, M & B Manager, Don Cole, Acquisitions Manager, Done West, County Engineer, Jack Southard, Public Safety Manager, Gayla Barwick, Tourism Manager, Robert Nixon, Economic Development Manager, Becky Padrick, MSBU Coordinator, Joe Finnegan, PersonnellRisk Manager; Deputy Nickel, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES (1-0029) It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve the minutes ofthe meeting held February 1,2000; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMA TION/PRESENT A nON A. Presentation of Certificate/Budget Resolution No. 00::.44- The Chainnan presented a certificate and letter of appreciation to First National Bank and Trust of the Treasure Coast for the $2,500 donation for sponsorship of the South County Regional Sports Stadium. It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve Budget Resolution No. 00-44; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. Resolution No. 00-46- Proclaiming February 14,2000 as "Bobby Valentine's Day" inSt. Lucie County, Florida. It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 00-46; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. C. Cultural Affair Council- Mr. Jon Ward, Cultural Affairs Council, presented their quarterly report to the Board. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS(1-547) Ms. Jean Hearn, Tozier Road resident, addressed the Board regarding item 5-B, the Stewart Sand Mine. Ms. Hearn addressed possible erosion and public safety concerns. -1- '-' ..."", Ms. Hearn addressed the precedent she felt this may be setting in not addressing the Code Enforcement violations. Mr. Charles Grande, Hutchinson Island resident, thanked staff for all the infonnation brought forward at the previous evenings Worksession regarding impact fees. Mr. Grande suggested a staff member go to Home Depot and explain the actual situation regarding impact fees. Mr. Grande also addressed charges being levied to the residents of Nettles Island which have never been levied in the past. Com. Coward stated he felt it would be a very positiv~ step for St. Lucie County to clear up the misinfonnation which has been generated regarding the Home Depot site. He suggested the County send a letter to Home Depot clarifying the issue. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Lewis, to direct staffto draft a letter and personally deliver it to Home Depot; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. Mr. Stix Nixon, Governmental Affairs, Board of Realtors, addressed the Board on impact fees and suggested the letter ask what they would be willing to do for the community and what they have in mind. Mr. Nixon also addressed item 7 and the spoil site. He and the Board of Realtors encourage the Board of County Commissioners, to go on the fast track to obtain the spoil site which has been discussed, i.e. the Seminole site. Ms. Amy Wright, 423 Rouse Road, St. Lucie Village, addressed the Board on item 7. Ms. Wright stated her dream was to own a home on the water and just recently, she was made aware that the dumping site would be located across from her property. She expressed her concerns to the Board regarding the dumping of water and what it may do to the wells in the area. She requested the Board make every attempt to protect the residents in the area regardless of what needs to be done for this site. Mr. Brian Kilday, Conservation Alliance, addressed the Board regarding his analyzing the technical reports concerning the spoil site. Mr. Kilday addressed the major problems with the disposal site between Rouse Road and Michigan Street and suggested utilizing the site at the Airport. The County Administrator advised the Board that the purchase of the property would be contingent upon receiving the necessary pennits. Mr. Robert Anderson, resident living on Old Dixie, across from the disposal site. Mr. Anderson stated he was told by the County Administrator as well as the Consultant that should any damage be done to the water wells in the area, that it would be the county's liability. He stated he was not opposed provided a buffer zone would be placed IIi order not to place a negative impact on the properties. Mr. Anderson asked if someone could make him a guarantee that property value will not decrease because of the site, then he stated, "go forward, other I will have to fight this as much as I can". Mr. Anderson also advised the Board that they had not been properly notified of this site being considered and they received notification by a citizens group. Com. Coward suggested a minimum standard which should be put in place is that it be made part of the regular agenda tha~t res.idents be notified of the opportunity to come and voice their opinions rather than they¡ be notified by a citizens group. N þCLnt Com. Barnes concurred with Com. Coward and stated staff should have also gone directly to the residents as well as the government of St. Lucie Village. -2- '-' ~ 4. CONSENT AGENDA (1-1547) It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve the Consent Agenda; and, upon roll call motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List No. 19. 2. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Bluefield Ranch- The Board approved the Memorandum of Agreement between the Seminole Indian Tribe of Florida and St. Lucie County granting pennission for the Tribe to restore wetlands on Bluefield Ranch as mitigation for wetlands impacts on a proposed Seminole Tribe Residential Development, and authorized staffto sign the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Environmental Resource Pennit (ERP) for the proj ect. B. TourismIRJ. Gibson Advertising Invoices- The Board approved payment of the January invoices to R.J. Gibson in the amount of$I,022.50. 3. LEISURE SERVICES A. Increase amount of Equipment Request No. 00-47 and No. 00-54- The Board approved increasing the equipment requsts by $312 each for a total of$624, to purchase two Cushman Metal Frame, Manual Transmission Utility Carts for the Parks Division. B. Budget Amendment No. 00-112/Equipment Request No. 00-196- The Board approved the equipment request and budget amendment for use at the Historical Museum. 4. PUBLIC WORKS Engineering/Pennission to Advertise/Briargate M.S.B.U.- The Board approved acepting the- petitions and granting pennission to advertise for the initial public hearing to be held on March 7, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. 5. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE Bid No. 00-007/Driveway and Culvert Replacement- The Board approved awarding the bid to Belville Tractor Service for concrete replacement and to David Mann Construction for rock/dirt and asphalt replacement and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. 6. PURCHASING A. Permission to Advertise- The Board approved the request for permission to advertise a Request for Proposals for Contract Laboratory Services. B. Permission to Advertise- The Board approved the request for permission to advertise for bids for the Publication of the Delinquent Tax Notices. C. Property Record Removal- The Board approved removing various items from the Boards fixed assets inventory as listed. -3- - '-' "WI 7. PUBLIC SAFETY A. Equipment Request No. 00-195- The Board approved the equipment request to replace the existing duplexer for the Emergency Management Amateur Radio Service. B. Equipment Request No. 00-198 and No. 00-199- The Board approved the equipment requests to purchase a Digital Bath Generator and Incubator for the water testing of Ocean Side Parks and Indian River Lagoon. 8. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity- The Board approved the application of Able Aviation and Air Ambulance Service, Inc., d/b/a Able Ambulance for renewal of its Class B,E, and F Certificates of Public Convenience and Necessity based on detennination that Able remains in compliance with the tenns of its CONs and Chapter 1- 12.5 ofthe Code of Ordinances. B. Certificate of Public Convenience and NecessitylPennission to Advertise- TheBoard approved granting pennission to advertise for a public hearing on the application of We Care, Inc., for a Class F CON to be held on march 7, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. C. Pennission to Advertise- Notice ofIntent- Right of Way Abandonment- South 25th St. Phase IIISt. James Drive- The Board approved advertising the Notice ofIntent to Abandon, and authorized the Chainnan to execute the Abandonment Petition and proceed with the abandonment petition. D. Pennission to Advertise- Public Hearing Right of Way Abandonment- The Board approved advertising a Public Hearing for right of way abandonment for Becker Road (between the old and new Gilson Road) to be held on March 7,2000 at 7:00 p.m. or soon thereafter as possible. E. ' Pennission to Advertise- Public Hearing- Right of Way Abandonment- The Board approved advertising a Public Hearing for right of way abandonment for portions of Avenue "F" and North 41 st Street to be held on March 7, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. 9. AIRPORT A. Equipment Request No. 00-200- The Board approved the equipment request to purchase an equipment transport trailer for use at the St. Lucie County International Airport at an estimated cost of $900.00. B. Budget Amendment No. 00-113/Equipment Request No. 00-108- The Board approved the budget resolution and approved the $10,000 increase in the equipment request for the purchase of a used slope mower to be used at the St. Lucie County International Airport. REGULAR AGENDA 5. PUBLIC WORKS(l-2733) A. EngineeringlResolution No. 00-045- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to adopt the resolution approving the Final Assessment for the Anita Street Municipal Services Benefit Unit. -4- '-" ...., Com. Barnes and Com. Coward commended staff on their ability to keep costs down for those requesting this service. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. Tozour Road Mine- For consideration before the Board, was staff recommendation to approve the revised setbacks along the south and west boundary of the mine, approve the substitution of pond cypress for assorted vegetation in the littoral zone planting plan, approve closure ofthe Tozour Road Mine and approve the release of the $30,935 bond (letter of credit) in favor of Frank Stewart Trucking, Inc. The Public Works Director addressed Ms. Jean Hearn's concerns regarding the erosion and public safety issues as well as her Code Enforcement concerns. Com. Coward addressed the precedent this may establish and stated he is willing to work with the person due to the fact that there are huge costs in going back and putting sand back into place meeting our buffer requirements, but, at the same time he feels it should not be done unless there is more compensation than just shifting the plants around. He felt there should be some type of monetary compensation for the fact that they did not meet their master plan and the land that they prómised to the county for public use has now been reduced substantially. He would like to see some portion ofthe outstanding bond going to the county to compensate for that loss as well as the incredible amount of staff time that was put into this on going Code Enforcement violation. Com. Barnes pointed out that the county is presently negotiating with this person for a piece of land to the east, to be used for access to US # I frontage. The Public Works Director advised the Board that they are in the process of negotiating for the property east of this location with the same landowner. Com. Barnes suggested rather than going for the bond, the county could obtain this property as compensation. The County Attorney stated he believed this property has been assessed. Com. Coward concurred with Com. Barnes' suggestion. The County Attorney suggested deferring action on this item if the Board is requesting negotiating for the other property as compensation because once the bond is released, their negotiating ability will be decreased. The Board concurred. This item was deferred and will be re-agendad . 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (2-110) FFY 2000 CDBG Grant- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to proceed with selecting the consultantls to prepare and administer the grant provided a qualified project is identified. Mr. Robert Nixon, Economic Development Manager advised the Board of the converted raw scores . After tabulating the ranking ofthe consultants, the majority of the Board had selected Craig A. Smith and Associates for the FFY 2000 CDBG RFP 00-13 and RFP 00-10. -5- '-" '-' 7. COUNTY ATTORNEY (2-451) Dredge Disposal Site- For Consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to authorize staff to begin the necessary due diligence (i.e. title, appraisals, review appraisal, environmental audit) leading to a possible purchase ofthe Seminole Indian site. If staff is successful in negotiating a contract to purchase the site, the contract will be presented to the Board for formal approval. The County Administrator advised the Board that he as well as the Consultants are prepared to give a two hour presentation if needed. As an alternative to the lengthy presentation he offered a short version. The County Administrator advised the Board that he and Mr. Patel will be attending the St. Lucie Village Alderman's meeting next Tuesday evening where the public is being invited to address their concerns. The Fort Pierce Harbor Committee voted 5 to 1 to move forward and pursue the due diligence on this site. The County Administrator recommended that the county move forward to perform the necessary due diligence, such as title searches, environmental assessments etc., to purchase the Seminole site and if staff is successful in negotiating a contract to purchase the property, then staff would come back to the BCC with a contract for their consideration, prior to bringing a contract back to the Board, a workshop be scheduled concerning the site. At this point we would know whether or not staff has been successful in negotiating an agreement. Ifwe' re not successful, then it would be a dead issue, however, if staff is successful in negotiating a contract for the property with the contingency that it would be purchased upon receiving the necessary permits and approvals from the various agencies. Com. Barnes commented on the sharing of the cost of the spoil site by the various agencies and stated he personally would like for the county to go forward with the understanding that we are not approving the purchase of the site today, but, to see if we can purchase the site and in the meantime try to answer everyone's concerns. The County Administrator advised the Board that he spoke with Mr. Murphy from the Army Corps of Engineers and he had stated he had spoken with NOAA to enter into an agreement with them to contract a Dr. Porney through the agency to monitor the entire operation of the Corps off shore dumping. Com. Coward stated he was disappointed not to see included in the packet the comparisons of the alternate sites. The County Administrator advised the Board that he had provided the information. Com. Coward questioned a liner being necessary for this site and asked the cost for this liner. The County Administrator advised the Board that they are prepared to discuss the need or not need of the liner. The Consultant stated there is no guarantee that the Seminole site will not require a liner and this is part of the due diligence. The cost difference noted between both sites is the liner and it is not known as yet ifthe Seminole site will need the liner. . Com. Coward stated his concerns with spending $20,000 to find out if a liner is needed. Com. Coward stated he needed a much more comfort level on the airport site before he is ready to disqualify it. -6- '-' ."",; The Consultant reviewed the disqualified zones as per the Airport Director. He asked the Board to remember that those properties to the west which are not owned would require additional distance for pumping. The Consultant advised the Board that they expect a 35 year life span of the disposal site provided nothing is being hauled away and not finding any beneficial use of the material. Part of the long tenn project is to find a use for the muck material sediment and hopefully extend the life of the site. Com. Coward commented on the site known as # 4 on the map. He stated the western side is improved pasture land and has cattle. There has been sewage disposal in that area pennitted by the DEP and he does not buy the idea of this being a wetland mitigation area. Com. Bruhn stated the issue is whether or not they want to utilize the Seminole site or the Airport site and we should find out today if there is support for either one. Com. Lewis stated the issue today was not to select the site, but to detennine whether or not they wanted to obtain further infonnation on the Seminole site and stated he was not prepared to make a decision on the site since she has not received all pertinent infonnation on the site. Com. Bruhn stated he would not want something like this in his back yard nor would he place it in someone else's. The County Administrator advised the Board that if the Airport property is ruled out and the Board decides not to go with the Seminole property, then the county is out of sites and there are no alternatives. Com. Hutchinson stated she would like to see the workshops scheduled and completed and then have some answers. She stated the Board cannot receive true answers unless a first step is taken fOlWard, something which has not happened for the last 4 to 6 years, the $20,000 is well worth finding out the necessary answers, a comparison cannot be done unless all the infonnation is in front of you to review. Com. Coward stated the cost exceeds the necessary details needed to make a comparison. He stated he cannot spend another $20,000 if he cannot get answers to questions he asked regarding site # 4 at the airport such as how many acres are there, is thi~ :m alternative site, and answers to the concerns regarding water quality and the Indian River Lagoon. He also requested the answers to his questions about alternative sites. The Consultant stated that even if they could put the site on the western portion of # 4, the cost values do not change. . Mr. Patel stated he agrees with some of the concernS the public has brought forth today, but, he thinks too many assumptions are being made. They are saying that given the infonnation they have to date, and they have spoken with Bruce Gerner, FDEP, he stated the Seminole site would be a better site than the airport site. He asked he be given the opportunity to work together on this project since it is still not known if this will be the site, they do not know about the ground water as yet, but, a first step is needed in order to proceed with finding out this infonnation. Com. Barnes stated the airport has fresh water, and FDEP does not approve taking salt water and placing it into fresh water. Com. Lewis stated she would like to proceed fOlWard and get some answers. ··7- '-" ~ Com. Coward stated he is not getting the answers necessary and he felt the issue is they should back up and look at the alternative sites and what is best to proceed and then spend the additional funds to do a more detailed analysis and if it is the Seminole site, then we can move forward. He is not comfortable spending $20,000 when he is forced to make assumptions. He felt one week would not make a difference other than to give the Board a greater comfort level in making a decision. Com. Barnes stated his view was that they were not being asked to buy the property at this point, but, to take the advice of those they have paid and those who have volunteered their time to look at these issue and move forward on the site. If in the next week there are problems that come back, then the contract can be terminated immediately or if one or more of the Commissioners come up with valid concerns, they can also be addressed next week. This is their number one site selection and we will not know if we can even purchase the site until we ask the buyer and also do the environmental assessments. Ifwe do not move forward, we may lose this site. Com. Barnes then stated his vote was to move forward. It was then moved by Com. Barnes, to proceed with staff recommendation; Com. Coward stated he would not vote in favor ofthis motion due to the fact he felt there was a lack of information. After discussion, it was seconded by Com. Hutchinson; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay's: Bruhn, Coward; Aye': Lewis, Hutchinson, Barnes; motion carried by a vote of3 to 2. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at IQ :50 a.m. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court -8- # '-' ...." AGENDA REOUEST /1 ITEM NO. "'~ DATE: February 15, 2000 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-47 - Proclaiming the Week of February 20, 2000, through February 26, 2000, as "ENGINEERS WEEK" in St. Lucie County, Florida. BACKGROUND: The Treasure Coast Chapter of the Florida Engineering Society has requested that this Board proclaim February 20,2000, through February 26, 2000, as Engineers Week. The attached Resolution No. 00-47 has been drafted for that purpose. FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 00-47 as drafted. [X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: NCE: COMMISSION ACTION: ou as Anderson Co ty Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: \1.lJ,jn o...r~ Originating Dept. Management & Budget purchasing : Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 ) ¡ '-' '...I .' RESOLUTION NO. 00-47 A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF FEBRUARY 20, 2000, THROUGH FEBRUARY 26, 2000, AS "ENGINEERS WEEK" IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Engineers have used their scientific and technical knowledge and skills in creative and innovative ways to fulfill society's needs. 2. Engineers face the major technological challenges of our time; from rebuilding towns devastated by natural disasters, to designing an information superhighway that will speed our country into this new century. 3. Engineers are encouraging our young math and science students to realize the practical power of their knowledge. 4. The residents of S1. Lucie County will look more than ever to engineers and their knowledge and skills to meet the challenges of the future. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board does hereby proclaim the week of February 20,2000, through February 26, 2000, as "ENGINEERS WEEK" in S1. Lucie County, Florida. 2. This Board urges the citizens of S1. Lucie County to join in paying tribute to engineers for their contributions to our society. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 15th day of February, 2000. f ~ ATTEST: DEPUTY CLERK '-' "wi BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY A~DA REQUEST ITEM W6. -L DATE: February 15, 2000 )~\jð = . " REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 Donald 8. West, P. E. County Engineer SUBJECT: Taylor CreeklC25 Canal Restoration Project. Engineering Design Contract with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner/BCI Engineers & Scientists BACKGROUND: The Taylor CreeklC25 Canal Restoration Project involves the dredging of Taylor Creek from the C25 spillway structure and the Ft. Pierce Farms C1 canal spillway structure to the Indian River Lagoon. The project will involve the removal of approximately 170,000 cubic yards of dredge material to restore Taylor Creek to original design depth. The sediments have been accumulating in the creek for the last 50 years. Dredging restoration is an important element of the Indian River Lagoon Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP). Many of the Lagoon's tributaries are filled to capacity with deposits of fine-grained muck sediment, especially where deeper areas have trapped sediment particles over many years. With this diminished trapping capacity, there is a greater threat of direct muck transport to the estuary, which can degrade water quality and habitat (see attached Indian River Lagoon Newsletter). Over many years, the sediments have accumulated to a depth of about 6-7 feet deep in the center channel. Once the sediments are removed, Taylor Creek will function as a silt trap to accumulate fine- grained silt before it is discharged to the Indian River Lagoon. In addition, the navigation channel will be restored to its full depth to benefit the public. Several agencies are partnering with St. Lucie County to accomplish the restoration of Taylor Creek, including: South Florida Water Management District, St. Johns River Water Management District/ National Estuary Program and Florida Inland Navigation District. On September 14, 1999, the BOCC approved a grant contract with St. Johns River Water Management District/National Estuary Program in the amount of $188,000. These funds are intended for the design and permitting of the Taylor Creek Project, and the contract requires $62,000 local matching funds from St. Lucie County. The attached engineering contract (Work Authorization No. 13) with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner/BCI Engineers & Scientists, is for the design and permitting ofthe Taylor Creek Project. The contract includes design of the Taylor Creek dredging work, including: surveying, sediment analysis, construction plans preparation, construction monitoring, and permitting. The total contract is in the amount of $310,380. ---- The project budget would be estab1i'5hed as follows: . '-' "'" , ~ Surveying .......................... $113,560 , Soil/Sediment Analysis ................ $ 37,500 Engineering Design & Permitting ........ $108,960 Public Meetings. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 23,960 Project Management & Reports ......... $ 27.400 Subtotal Engineering Contract. . . . . $311,380 Permit Fees. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 10,000 Contingencies/Reserves . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 28.620 Total Project Budget. . . . . . . . . . . . . $350,000 The funding for the design contract would be provided as follows: SJRWMD/NEP ...................... $188,000 St. Lucie County ..................... $ 62,000 *FIND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $100.000 Total Available Funding .......... $350,000 *The monies provided by FIND would be reimbursed after the permits are obtained. St. Lucie County would be required to advance fund this portion of the project with reimbursement to be provided by FIND at completion. FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds will be made available in the Port Budget Account No. 140120-4115-531000-4657 PREVIOUS ACTION: March 9, 1999 - BOCC approved Work Authorization No. 11 for preparation of FIND grant application in the amount of $11,000. May 4, 1999 - BOCC approved Work Authorization No. 12 for spoil site selection study in the amount of $25,220. September 14, 1999 - BOCC approved a grant contract with SJRWMD/NEP for $188,000. February 8,2000 - BOCC approved proceeding with appraisal and title for land acquisition of upland spoil site in the amount of $20,000. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends BOCC approval ofthedesign contract with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner/BCI Engineers & Scientists (Work Authorization No. 13) for the Taylor CreeklC25 Restoration Project, subject to final review and approval by the County Attorney, authorization for the chairman to sign, and approval ofthe project budget as outlined above. [XJ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (5-0) Not to exceed $86,900. ~-- ~ COMMISSION ACTION: CoordinationlSi~natures [x]Mgt. & Budget [x]Co. Eng [ ]BudgeURevenue_ [x]County Attorney [x]Originating Dept. Public Works taylorc25.ag [ ]Other . ,. ..' Page 1 of 12 ¡,evised 2/11/00 '-' "wI1 EXHIBIT A ST. LUCIE COUNTY T AYLOR CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT SEDIMENT REMOVAL FEASIBILITY, DISPOSAL SITE DESIGN, PERMITTING, BID SPECIFICATIONS SCOPE OF WORK General Project Description The overall goal of this Restoration Project is to evaluate and design for the removal and disposal of accumulated sediments to achieve previously defined design depths in Taylor Creek, Fort Pierce, Florida. This scope includes work required to prepare and submit permit applications (Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), FOOT, FECRR, and SLC Land Development permits), including selection and design of a disposal site, evaluation of potential final uses of dredged sediments, participation through a Public Advisory Committee, monthly updates to the Harbor Advisory Committee and three public update meetings. The Taylor Creek restoration project area, as defined in this scope, extends from the western right-of-way of the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) to the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Canal No. C-25 spillway and the Fort Pierce Farms Water Control District (FPFWCD) Canal No.1 (referred to as F-l) spillway. The reaches of the project are defined as follows: · Reach No.1: The area between Florida East Coast Railroad (FECRR) bridge and the western right-of-way of the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW). · Reach No.2: the area between the FECRR bridge and the spillway at the C-25 Canal and submerged weir at the F -1 canal. · Reach No.3: The area between the submerged weir at the F -1 Canal and the F-l Canal spillway. Reach No.1 involves the removal of approximately 90,000 cubic yards (c.y.) of sediment (determined in-place volume) from approximately 2,300 linear feet of the previously designed navigation channel (approximately -12.5 ft MSL). The width of the design channel is 140 feet from the FECRR bridge to a point approximately 1810 feet dovvTIstream, and the average channel width tapers to 100 feet from this point to the ICW. The average depth of the sediment is estimated to be between six and seven feet throughout this channel. Reach No.2 involves the removal of approximately 80,000 C.y to re-establish the design channel depth (approximately -12.5 ft MSL). The width of the design channel is 140 feet for this reach. Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. AG~A REQUEST ITEM N..t --L DATE: February 15, 2000 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 PRESENTED BY: .Y- ~O&&J 6JQbL-- (" Donald B. W t, P.E. County Engineer TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Taylor CreeklC25 Canal Restoration Project. Engineering Design Contract with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner/BCI Engineers & Scientists BACKGROUND: The Taylor CreeklC25 Canal Restoration Project involves the dredging of Taylor Creek from the C25 spillway structure and the Ft. Pierce Farms C1 canal spillway structure to the Indian River Lagoon. The project will involve the removal of approximately 170,000 cubic yards of dredge material to restore Taylor Creek to original design depth. The sediments have been accumulating in the creek for the last 50 years. Dredging restoration is an important element of the Indian River Lagoon Comprehensive Conservation and Management Plan (CCMP). Many of the Lagoon's tributaries are filled to capacity with deposits of fine-grained muck sediment, especially where deeper areas have trapped sediment particles over many years. With this diminished trapping capacity, there is a greater threat of direct muck transport to the estuary, which can degrade water quality and habitat (see attached Indian River Lagoon Newsletter). Over many years, the sediments have accumulated to a depth of about 6-7 feet deep in the center channel. Once the sediments are removed, Taylor Creek will function as a silt trap to accumulate fine- grained silt before it is discharged to the Indian River Lagoon. In addition, the navigation channel will be restored to its full depth to benefit the public. Several agencies are partnering with St. Lucie County to accomplish the restoration of Taylor Creek, including: South Florida Water Management District, St. Johns River Water Management District/ National Estuary Program and Florida Inland Navigation District. On September 14, 1999, the BOCC approved a grant contract with St. Johns River Water Management District/National Estuary Program in the amount of $188,000. These funds are intended for the design and permitting of the Taylor Creek Project, and the contract requires $62,000 local matching funds from St. Lucie County. The attached engineering contract (Work Authorization No. 13) with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner/BCI Engineers & Scientists, is for the design ofthe Taylor Creek Project. The contract includes design ofthe Taylor Creek dredging work, including: sediment sampling and analysis, water quality sampling, chemical characterization of sediments and water, and analysis of dewatering techniques for sediment removal and disposal. The total contract is in the amount of $86,900. Th€- project budget would ~~ established as follows: .~ . -- Soil/Sediment Analysis ................ Engineering Design . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Total Project Budget . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~ $ 47,860 $ 39.040 $ 86,900 The funding for the design contract would be provided as follows: SJRWMD/NEP ...................... $188,000 St. Lucie County ..................... $ 62,000 *FIND . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $100.000 Total Available Funding .......... $350,000 'The monies provided by FIND would be reimbursed after the pennits are obtained. Sf. Lucie County would be required to advance fund this portion of the project with reimbursement to be provided by FIND at completion. FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds will be made available in the Port Budget Account No. 140120-4115-531000-4657 PREVIOUS ACTION: March 9, 1999 - BaCC approved Work Authorization No. 11 for preparation of FIND grant application in the amount of $11 ,000. May 4, 1999 - BOCC approved Work Authorization No. 12 for spoil site selection study in the amount of $25,220. September 14, 1999 - BOCC approved a grant contract with SJRWMD/NEP for $188,000. February 8, 2000 - BaCC approved proceeding with appraisal and title for land acquisition of upland spoil site in the amount of $20,000. RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends BaCc approval of the design contract with Williams, Hatfield & Stoner/BCI Engineers & Scientists (Work Authorization No. 13) for the Taylor Creek/C25 Restoration Project, subject to final review and approval by the County Attorney, authorization for the chairman to sign, and approval of the project budget as outlined above. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [ 1 APPROVED [ 1 DENIED [ laTHER: Douglas Anderson County Administrator ¡9J/ [x]County Attorney f- [x]Originating Dept. Public Works t(jU taylorc25.ag [x]Mgt. & Budget [X]Co.En~ []BudgeuRevenue_____ [ ]Other \ "' ~ AGENDA REQUEST ""'" ITEM NO. 5B DATE: February" 2000 15 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] , - TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: Tozour Road Mine; approve: 1) the revised setbacks along the south and west boundary of the mine per the attached survey, 2) the substitution of pond cypress for assorted vegetation in the littoral zone planting plan, 3) closure of the Tozour Road Mine, and 4) release of the $30,935 bond (letter of credit) in favor of Frank Stewart Trucking, Inc. BACKGROUND: Tozour Road mine is located in northern St. Lucie County (S81T34S/R40E) just west of Tozour Road and U.S. NO.1 and adjacent to the Northern Savannahs. This 49-acre parcel has been mined since the original permit approval by the Board on November 20, 1973. The northern phase (Phase I) of the mine was completed and closed out several years ago. Staff performed several site inspections since the final permit expired on June 7, 1997 and have found the remaining mine site (Phase II) non-conforming to reclamation requirements. Since the expiration of the reclamation period (January, 1998), the site has remained in noncompliance and code enforcement action was taken. Reclamation activities were recently completed on the site which included; 1) regrading of the side slopes to a minimum of 4: 1 or shallower to a depth of 4' below the normal water elevation, 2) grading of a berm/swale system along the eastern shoreline to minimize erosion, 3) seeding & mulching of the disturbed areas, and 4) replanting of the littoral zone with pond cypress. Based on review of the recently completed survey and field inspection, the site is now in conformance with the original reclamation plan, with the exception ofthe following two deviations: 1) After consultation with Mr. Steve Fousek, Environmental Lands Specialist, it was determined that this particular site would better benefit from the planting of cypress trees along the littoral zone rather than the assorted vegetation identified in the original littoral zone planting. Based on a cost comparison, it was agreed that 100 pond cypress would be planted. The planting of 100 pond cypress has been completed in compliance with this deviation. 2) The approved mining plan identified setbacks along the western and southern boundary of 50' and 64 respectively. In order to meet the 4:1 side slope criteria, a portion of the proposed setbacks were excavated and resloped. The new setbacks along the western boundary range from approximately 20' to 50' and along the southern boundary from approximately 30' to 150'. The new setbacks are still within the minimum allowable by the Land Development Code of 15'. A much safer condition now exists along the shoreline and vehicular access is still maintained. Staff recommends the Board approve 1) the revised setbacks along the south and west boundary of the mine per the attached survey, 2) the substitution of pond cypress for assorted vegetation in the littoral zone planting plan, 3) closure of the Tozour Road Mine and 4) release of the $30,935 bond (letter of credit) in favor of Frank Stewart Trucking, Inc. , Tozour $Qad Sand Mine BQJCC Agenda 2/8/00 Page 2 ~ ~ FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A. PREVIOUS ACTION: November 20, 1973: Original four (4) year mining permit approved by the BOCC November 20, 1977: Four (4) year permit extension approved December 28, 1981: Permit transfer to Ben Stewart March 25, 1982: Four (4) year permit extension approved March 26, 1986: Eight (8) year permit renewal approved August 13, 1991: Permit transfer to Frank Stewart March 26, 1994: Permit expired June 7, 1994: Three (3) year permit approved June 7, 1997: Permit expired Presently under code enforcement action. RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends the Board approve 1) the revised setbacks along the south and west boundary of the mine per the attached survey I 2) the substitution of pond cypress for assorted vegetation in the littoral zone planting plan, 3) closure of the Tozour Road Mine and 4) release of the $30,935 bond (letter of credit) in favor of Frank Stewart Trucking, Inc. COMMISSION ACTION: [x] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (4-0) (Barnes absent) CE: (x]County Attorney ~ Coordination/SiQnatures t' J( / /<-v "-- ( ]Mgt. & Budget (x]Co. Eng f!f~{ -1f~ ( ]Finance Dept. (x]Originating Dept. Public Works ( ]BudgeURevenue Coord. Paue 2 of 12 . to Revised 2/11/00 ....." '-' The sediment for Reach No.3 will also be evaluated and considered for only muck removal. Muck probes will be conducted on 500-foot intervals in this reach in order to determine the approximate muck volume and to perfonn testing of the physical characteristics. A modification to the project surveying, engineering and construction cost and the ERP will be required if dredging and disposal is required for this reach. Costs associated with design and permitting of muck sediment removal in this area will be handled as "Additional Services". The project will also evaluate the existence of fine-grained, organic sediment (muck) that may exist between the north and south banks of Reach No. 1 & 2. The removal of this muck will be included in the permitting process. The project will also determine the approximate volume and removal feasibility of muck sediments from the areas approximately 1,000 linear feet west of the spillway for the F-l and C-25 canal. Probe measurements will be taken to determine muck depths at approximately 50, 500, 1,000 feet and 0.5 mile upstream from the F-l and C-25 spillways. A sediment and water sample will be collected west of each spillway for chemical characterization. A sediment sample will also be collected at each probe for physical characteristics. The objectives of this project are to: · Characterize chemical and physical characteristics of the sediments to previously design depths of approximately -12.5 ft MSL, or to hard bottom (muck depth) in the above referenced project area. · Generate cross sections for construction bid and permit application documents. · Assess alternatives and determine a preferred method of removing and disposing sediments, including beneficial use options. · Design one spoil disposal site for use in the project. · Hold pre-application meetings with the permitting agencies and prepare and submit an application for the applicable permits (primarily the ERP) and respond to agency comments. · Provide a forum for public input through a Public Advisory Committee and through Harbor Advisory Committee monthly updates. To accomplish the above objectives, project work will be divided into the following phases and tasks: PHASE I: DESIGN AND PERMITTING Task 1: Review Available Information, Pre-application Meeting with Applicable Regulatory, Sample Collection & Evaluation, Flocculant Selection Sediment Removal and Disposal Alternatives Surveys of Disposal Site Task 2: Task 3: Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. Pane 3 of 12 , 0 Rcvised 2/11/00 Task 4: Task 5: PHASE II: Task 6: Task 7: Task 8: '-' ,."" Disposal Site Geotechnical Exploration, Design and Permitting of Impoundment Environmental Resource Permit (ERP), Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), Florida East Coast Rail Road (FECRR) and St. Lucie County (SLC) Permit Applications PUBLIC P ARTICIP A TION, BIDDING, CONSTRUCTION PLANS, PROJECT MANAGEMENT Construction Plans, Bid Specification Preparation, and Contractor Selection Public Advisory Committee and Public Meetings Project Management, Meetings, and Reports The project will be initiated with a kick-off meeting, at which time the proposed scope. schedule, project coordination procedures, reporting requirements for St. Lucie County SLC, SFWMD, FIND, and the Indian River Lagoon Program (IRLP) will be confirmed. PHASE I: Task 1: DESIGN AND PERMITTING Review Available Information, Pre-application Meeting with Applicable Regulatory, Sample Collection & Evaluation, Flocculant Selection. Task 1.1 Site and Sediment Information for Permit Application Preparation. "P~,~ CONSULTANT will perfonn a collection of literature, obtain reports, maps, aerial photographs, design plans, and other relevant information that will be used to make applications for various permits (ERP, FDOT, FECRR, SLC etc.). The following agencies may be contacted to obtain the relevant information: · City of Fort Pierce · St. Lucie County (SLC) · Florida Department of Transportation. (FDOT) · United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) · Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) · Florida East Coast Rail Road (FECRR) · South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) · U.S. Coast Guard · Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) · U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service · Department of State, Division of Archives, History and Records Management Pre-application meetings will be held with FDEP, USACOE, SFWMD and SLC. Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. 'page 4 of 12 Revised 2/11/00 '-" '.J Deliverables: · ERP, FDOT, FECRR and SLC Permit Information. (CONSULTANT) Task 1.2 Sediment and Water Quality Data Review, Additional Sample ColI~ction, Flocculant Selection, and Sediment Qualification 'S~~~-t;, CONSULTANT will review additional available reports and data Co~~·the sediments and water quality of the project area prior to any further field sampling. This information will be used to assist in refining additional information for the sediments to be dredged and for use in the ERP. Based on earlier investigations of sediment characteristics, chemical polymers will be evaluated by CONSULTANT to properly design different disposal options and supplement the ERP required to dredge the creek. Once the relevant information is reviewed and summarized, additional in situ field sediment sampling will be conducted for areas outside of the design channel (the banks of Taylor Creek north and south of the design channel). Seven (7) locations will be sampled at various depths as required by the regulatory agencies for chemical characterization. (Two (2) composite samples to -12.5 MSL; one in Reach No.1 & 2; and five (5) muck samples; one (1) west of C-25 spillway, one (1) west of the F-I fixed weir, and three (3) in Reaches 1 & 2.). All sample locations will be identified and mapped using a Global Positioning System. Depending on the depth and sediment, samples will be collected either using a piston tube sampler or vibracoring. Five (5) water samples will be collected for chemical characterization. One (1) sample from each reach will be collected along with one (1) sample west of each spillway. Collected samples will be placed in jars, sealed and returned to appropriate testing laboratories for chemical and physical characterization. All samples will be collected in accordance with FDEP approved Comprehensive Quality Assurance Plan (CompQAP). Muck sediment from the banks north and south of the design channel throughout Taylor Creek will be considered for removal. Deliverables: · Provide additional permit application information. · Collect sediment and water samples for physical and chemical testing. Task 1.3 Physical/Engineering and Chemical Characterization :s~ J'S~y;...~t CONSULTANT will conduct laboratory testing to determine the~;-' physical and engineering properties of individual and composite samples (From Task 1.2) to assist in determining handling characteristics, disposal behavior and Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. .Page 5 of 12 Revised 2/11/00 ~ "wII alternative uses. Twelve (12) individual and/or composite samples will be tested for the following properties: · Moisture/-200 sieve · Specific Gravity · Atterberg Limits · Organic Content · Grain Size Testing will be conducted in accordance with appropriate American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards. The samples will be classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System. In addition, 30-Day settling tests with and without chemical flocculants will also be performed to further refine expected sediment slurry behavior at the disposal site and return water impacts. The chemical characteristics of the sediments will be used to supplement the ERP. Additional chemical characteristics of the creek water and sediment will be determined for selected samples from the study area as needed for determining any specialized handling and disposal requirements. Chemical testing will focus on determining the concentrations of selected inorganic nutrients, heavy metals, oil and grease, pesticides, herbicides and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (P AHs ). Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) test will be performed to determine possible environmental impacts to the ground water at the disposal site. Chemical and TCLP testing for two composite sediment and water samples are included. The chemical data will be important in assessing potential implications to environmental permitting, if any, and assessment of various beneficial use options for the dewatered sediment. CONSUL T ANT will prepare a letter report for all aspects of Task 1.2 and 1.3. will critique and provide comments to a "Draft" letter report prior to final submittal to County. Deliverables: · Identification of muck and in the expanded (north and south of Taylor Creek design channel; muck identification is already complete within the Taylor Creek channel) project area. · Sediment physical and chemical characterization data. · Review and edit of draft letter-report. · Letter-Report summary of data, analysis and conclusions. TASK 2: Sediment Removal and Disposal Alternatives Task 2.1 Analysis of Dredge and Disposal Options, Dewatering Techniques and Potential Beneficial Uses of Dredged Materials. S-~J~~~~ ~~ Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. Page 6 of 12 'Revised 2/11/00 ........ ~ The laboratory chemical and physical/engineering test data and estimated muck volume for Reach No's I & 2 will be used to determine the sediment volume increase (bulking factor) due to dredging as well as the settling and dewatering characteristics of the dredged sediments at the disposal site. The bulking factor depends on the method of dredging (mechanical or hydraulic), along with the settling and dewatering characteristics, and it will be used to determine the capacity needed for the disposal site. Depending on the physical characterization of the sediments, chemical flocculants will be evaluated to enhance dewatering performance of the dredged material and the quality of the return water. Whole Body Toxicity testing will be conducted for the recommended chemical flocculant. The toxicity testing will be further refined to determine the optimal use of polymers to avoid impacts to the aquatic fauna. Testing will be performed in accordance with approved FDEP methods. This approach will be assessed with disposal concepts such as hydrocyc1oning to separate the fine- and coarse-grained materials for beneficial uses. This task will evaluate possible uses of the dredged sediments for public benefit. Hydraulic dredging appears to be the logical and economical method for removal of the sediments from the navigation channel of Taylor Creek in combination with sand separation and/or dewatering systems Deliverables: · Dredging and disposal alternatives (recommend alternative to SLC). · Potential separation of sediments using hydrocyc1oning and/or flocculants. · Beneficial uses of dredge materials. · Cost Analysis · Review of draft letter-report · Letter-report TASK 3: Surveys of Disposal Site, Master Plan of Site, Phase I Audit, and Mitigation Plan Task 3.1 Surveys of Disposal Site s~~ CONSUL T ANT will utilize the existing Boundary Survey for the site (prepared by Jolm Albrichten) and the 1997 survey of the wetland delineation (performed by McAlley). If these surveys are not adequate, CONSULT ANT will provide a scope amendment for these "Additional Services". CONSULTANT will complete a detailed survey of the upland disposal site. This will include Topographic (200 ft. grid, up to 100 ft. off-site on the north, west, and south sides. cross section and location of the onsite pond and dredged lagoon), jurisdictional wetland (The north end of the property has not been delineated), upland plant and animal species of concern and aboveground utilities. Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. page 7 of 12 Rcvised 2/11/00 '-' ""'" This proposal assumes use of the wetland delineation approved by USACOE and SFWMD in 1997 to accurately define wetland limits. CONSUL T ANT will map (not a survey) vegetation cover types of entire property, for use in defining higher quality areas for impact avoidance. Conduct habitat quality assessments of each cover type, or portions of each cover type, for use in calculating impacts and available mitigation credits. CONSULTANT will coordinate with FFWC, and USFWS and conduct cursory surveys of property to determine occurrence, or likelihood of occurrence, of protected speCIes. Deliverables: · Topographic, jurisdictional wetland, upland plant and animal species of concern and aboveground utilities. · Map and report describing vegetation cover types including habitat quality assessments. Task 3.2 Pipeline Route Evaluation ~~~ CONSULTANT will perform an evaluation for the potential pipeline routes, including structures, utilities, and right-of-way concerns (public versus private). CONSULTANT will map wetland limits within one landside pipeline, and obtain jurisdictional determinations from USACOE and FDEP. CONSULTANT will map vegetation cover types within one pipeline route, and conduct habitat quality assessments of each cover type, or portions of each cover type, for use in calculating impacts. CONSULTANT will coordinate with FFWC, and USFWS and conduct cursory surveys of one pipeline route to determine occurrence, or likelihood of occurrence, of protected species. CONSUL T ANT will research availability of recent data and mapping of seagrasses adjacent to project area, from MHW to western limits of Intracoastal Waterway channel, conducted by federal, state, or local entities. If no such data/mapping is available, CONSULTANT will map approximate limits of seagrasses adjacent to project area, from MHW to western limits of Intracoastal Waterway channel, in order to define lowest impact access route. The mapping for this task will not involve a survey; rather the limits will be drawn on an aerial as an approximate delineation. Deliverables: . Seagrass map. Williams, Hatfield & Stone~ Inc. . Page 8 of 12 Revised 2/11/00 '-" ...., · Pipeline Route Survey mapping. · Map and report describing vegetation cover types including habitat quality assessments of each cover type within one pipeline route Cost Analysis o l'M 1: Task 3.3 Phase I Audit of Disposal Site - ~~\S"'{\m~ ~ CONSUL T ANT will conduct a standard Phase I Environmental Site Assessment to detennine documented or potential contamination of the property. This Phase I ESA does not include any sampling or analysis of samples, but is based on review of reasonably available records, interviews with persons familiar with the property and a cursory site inspection ~U '" - ~ Deliverables: · Phase One Audit of site. Task 3.4 Environmental Master Plan of Site ":b ~ !.'S '" CONSULTANT will assess existing conditions, based predominantly on results of Tasks described in this Scope, to develop an Environmental Master Plan for use in determining feasible pennitting scenarios, and development phasing Deliverables: · Environmental Master Plan document. Task 3.5 Mitigation Plan Design ~~V\ CONSULTANT will work with St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District to prepare a mitigation plan, to realize maximum potential for generating on-site restoration/enhancement credits in the eastern impoundment area. The Mitigation Plan will include exotic vegetation removal, planting native vegetation, re-connection to tidal flow via channel excavation. This proposal assumes that any remaining mitigation needs will be met through purchase or funding of credits at approved County owned and/or constructed mitigation areas. This scope encompasses only design of mitigation at the Indrio Road property. Mitigation plan to be used in submittal of ERP application. CONSUL T ANT will design structures to be utilized in re-establishing tidal connection to impoundment area, or utilize standard design provided by Mosquito Control District. Deliverables: · Phase I Audit. · Upland disposal site, boundary, topographic, tree, flora and fauna survey(s). · Pipeline route reconnaissance and right-of-way concerns. · Environmental Master Plan of disposal site. Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. Page 9 of 12 . Revised 2/11/00 - '~ ..J · Mitigation Plan Design and Permit Application TASK 4: Disposal Site Geotechnical Exploration, Design and Impoundment Permitting ~LS~~~-t ~~'A... . Twenty (20) standard penetration test (SPT) borings (ASTM 01586-84) will be drilled at the site. The borings will be advanced to 15 (10 ea) and 30 feet (10 ea) below existing grade along the proposed alignment of the embankment and within interior sections. If the subsurface conditions vary, additional borings may be required. Additional borings, if needed, will be performed as "Additional Services". Task 4.1 Geotechnical, Exploration, and Observation Wells An engineer or geologist will be present to observe and document the drilling activities. After completion, the shallow borings will be backfilled with the drill cuttings. The 30-foot borings will be grouted if they encounter a confining unit such as clay or an underlying limestone formation. It is anticipated that no temporary casing will be required to maintain drilling fluid circulation. If temporary casing is required, it will be invoiced at cost. Four (4) shallow aquifer observation wells will be installed at the selected disposal site to determine water table elevations, groundwater gradient, and the background water quality. Groundwater samples will be collected from two wells and tested for primary and secondary drinking water standards to provide pre- disposal and background water quality information. The testing will serve as a baseline for the existing conditions. The Geotechnical engineer shall determine the need for protective measures to prevent saltwater intrusion into any freshwater aquiferes). Deliverables: · Field investigation data including detailed soil boring logs, water table elevations, and soil test results. · Background Water Quality test results. · Groundwater gradient. · Determination of need for protective measures for groundwater. Task 4.2 Disposal Site Design 1J~'6~ CONSUL T ANT will perform site design for selected (based on previous site selection study) sediment disposal site. All city, county, and state rules, regulations, and ordinances regarding the design of the disposal sites will be considered. A 10 to 25 foot high embankment with 2.5H: 1 V slopes is typically required. About five feet of the interior of the site will need to be excavated to build the perimeter embankment Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. PagelOofl2 Revised 2/11/00 '-' ...,,; Deliverables: · Site construction plans, details and technical specifications. Task 4.3 J>~,~ Disposal Site Impoundment Permitting CONSUL T ANT will assemble and prepare the application to South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) for the aboveground impoundment, based upon the engineering designs prepared by CONSULTANT. Two responses to RFI's are included. Deliverables: · Impoundment permit application and RFI's (up to two). Engineering/Report 1) Q...b ~~ Task 4.4 A report that describes the exploration and provides recommendations for embankment design will be prepared for the site after reviewing the project information available and analyzing the geotechnical information collected for the project. The site will be designed to meet the project needs and will be used in the ERP. A final report will be prepared by CONSULTANT for the site. Deliverables: · Field investigation data including detailed soil boring logs, water table elevations, and soil test results. · Background Water Quality test results. · The subsurface stratigraphy as necessary to illustrate the geotechnical conditions encountered in the soil borings. · A general evaluation of the site considering the proposed project and estimated geotechnical conditions. · Recommendations for embankment and spillway design. · The estimated slope stability performance based on the available data and the results of the geotechnical exploration. TASK 5: Permit Application Preparation and Submittal Task 5.1 "p~\~ Develop Draft and Final ERP CONSUL T ANT will provide all necessary information for a draft ERP, which will be developed, including 80% complete design plans (prepared by CONSUL T ANT) for County review prior to final submittal to the County. Most of the information will be provided as part of the tasks listed above. A pre- application meeting will be held to solicit input and any concerns from all agencies, particularly the FDEP, SFWMD, and USACOE. CONSUL T ANT will generate the permit applications. CONSULTANT will review the final ERP prior Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. Page II of 12 Revised 2/11/00 ,-,. ...., to submittal. CONSULTANT will attend all pre-application meetings and will provide assistance for any Requests for Addition Infonnation. CONSULTANT will carry out pre-application coordination meetings with FDEP and USACOE wetland regulatory pennitting staff to detennine pennit application requirements, and obtain agreement upon meeting wetland impact avoidance and minimization standards. Deliverables: · ERP application submittal ready for submittal to SFWMD & USACOE. · Penn it applications ready for submittal to FDOT, FECRR, SLC,and FDEP. · Response to two Requests for Additional Infonnation (RFI). PHASE II: BIDDING, CONSTRUCTION PLANS, AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT Task 6: Construction Plans, Bid Specification Preparation, and Contractor Selection Completion of Detailed Engineering Design j)Q.b~~. CONSULTANT will prepare the final, "construction-ready" dredge pipe route and disposal site design details based on the pennitted plans and any relevant technical specifications for dredging, pumping, treating, settling, and disposal handling of the dredged muck sediments. Construction and operational details will be written to sufficiently enable a dredging contractor to accurately bid the project. Task 6.1 Deliverables: · A copy of the Final Design Plans and Specifications that address details of the major components of the dredging and disposal operation. · Included in the Final Plan will be dredge depths, target volumes, and cost breakdowns for each component or phase of the project. Review of Construction Plans and Technical Specifications P.Qô'jV\ CONSULTANT will review conceptual, 80%, and final technical specifications and plans. CONSULTANT will also provide the survey plans and proposed canal cross-sections and any other infonnation required to accurately dredge the creek. Task 6.2 , Deliverables: · QAIQC of Plans and Specifications. Task 7: Public Advisory Committee and Public Meetings 1\&-l~ ~. A Public Advisory Committee (PAC) will be formed to solicit comments and concerns tì-om the citizens of the area during construction. The PAC will facilitate a forum for Williams¡ Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. Page 12 of 12 Revised 2/11/00 '-' "wI1 resolving these concerns and could consist of six to eight members, including commissioner(s), citizens, and personnel from organizations such as the Waterfront Council, Marine Resources Council and the Indian River Lagoon Program. This task will also include up to two public-update meetings. CONSULTANT will chair the committee. CONSULTANT will be present at each meeting. Deliverables: · Three PAC meetings and two public meetings · Continuous public involvement Project Management, meetings, and Reports ]>~~ .M~'Vi'M.h\-t The documents to be delivered to the County will include a reproducible set of tracings at a scale of I inch = 60 feet and digital copies in AutoCAD. Three signed and sealed sets of blue line drawings will also be delivered at the draft and final deliverable phase. Task 8: CONSULTANT will submit a monthly status report to the County. This report will cover the work completed for that period, any technical or management problems, discussions or correspondence with the regulatory agencies and work planned for the upcoming period. Other reporting requirements will be addressed at the County's request. Ten meetings are included in the project budget. Meeting 1: Meeting 2 - 4: Kick-off meeting with County and co-funding agency personnel Pre-application meeting with regulatory staff to discuss disposal site permitting issues, including concerns from any other agencies. Project update prior to ERP submittal. Project meeting to review ERP comments and responses. Two additional project status meetings. Two additional meetings with County on project. Meeting 5: Meeting 6: Meetings 7 & 8 Meetings 9 & 10: Deliverables: · Draft reports as required. · Three final ERP copies and a disk copy (in Word). · Hard copies and disk copies of disposal site plans (in AutoCAD) · Monthly progress reports · Ten meetings as indicated above Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. Page 1 of 1 2/11/00 W' ...., WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 13 St. Lucie County Port and Airport Authority C-92-04-300 TAYLOR CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT Pursuant to that certain Agreement Between County and Engineer for Taylor Creek Dredge Disposal Site Selection and Acquisition (the AAgreement") between S1. Lucie County (the "County") and Williams Hatfield & Stoner, Inc., (The "Engineer") dated April 20, 1992, the Engineer agrees to provide the Scope of Services described in Exhibit A for the Compensation described in Exhibit B. All services provided under this Work Authorization shall be completed according to the schedule described in Exhibit C. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Engineer has affixed his, its, or their names, or name, on the dates below. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: ENGINEER BY: WITNESSES: PrintName: /4µ.¡'f1-fO~ A. IchL,4!JJ-.J Williams, Haffield & Stone , Inc. Date: '2. II· ð{; Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. Page 1 of 1 2/11/00 '-' 'wII WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 13 St. Lucie County Port and Airport Authority C-92-04-300 TAYLOR CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT Pursuant to that certain Agreement Between County and Engineer for Taylor Creek Dredge Disposal Site Selection and Acquisition (the AAgreement") between St. Lucie County (the "County") and Williams Hatfield & Stoner, Inc., (The "Engineer") dated April 20, 1992, the Engineer agrees to provide the Scope of Services described in Exhibit A for the Compensation described in Exhibit B. All services provided under this Work Authorization shall be completed according to the schedule described in Exhibit C. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Engineer has affixed his, its, or their names, or name, on the dates below. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: ENGINEER BY: PrintName: Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. Date: w'N! ~ '"þ\Þ~ Y\ìrt\~ . ~~ '? ~ loa)~ ~) ~&~-t -tJ- '7 .. Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. ~ E- - ~ - == ~ ~ E-< U ~ ~ o ~ ~ z >0 E-<- z~~ ;::¡~..J °o;::¡ UE-<Q ~CZ)~ -~:I: U~U :5~CZ) .~ E-<~ CZ)~ U ~ o ..J > ~ E-< '-' 0 ...., 0 D ~ 0 0 8 () \.9 0 0 0 \S) \S! 0 ~ ~ 0 "t L!) 0 (J) \9 ð) tn ~n ,... ,... n ^ ^ ^ r1J {¡ ,., "- ~ r() 0) I./) ~ " ~ c-l rJ (Y) E-< *~ CZ) 0 <=> 0 <=> 0 0 <=> 0 <=> U '¢ \C 00 \C 00 00 N <=> If C'I 00 r-:. o~ '¢ 0\ 00 - o~ O\~ '¢ O\~ Ó \C~ U C'I N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z o - E-< ~ - ~ U CZ) ~ Q o z: ;;:e:: ~ -< E-< E-< CZ) o U CZ) :I: ~ c z - E- E- - ~ 0:: ~ ~ Q Z < Z í-' - 00 ~ Q 0() = 'Z ~ ~ ::EO¿ = = 0,2 ,- +-' +-' 0 t1: ~ 0_ :'=0 ~U c¡:' Cl) ~- ... 0.. 0.... E = ~ t1: 0 g C/) ';:; ';:; >.. ~ t1: 1-.- E 0 Cl) ...~C/) <2"5= = 0() t1: - Cl)- ~o:::B .D ~ 0 - - 0 "':::::.D- .- t1: t.L.. t1: 0 ~ >.- = <Cã. 0 0.. ,- ~.....~ ~....... :::1 .- ...c - > +-' t1: ~.- > 0:::~u.J - ~ 00 < :I: ~ <=> \C M -.6 ~ 01 o '¢ ~ ~ .~... "'0 :::1 « '" Cl) > +-' t1: = .... Cl) .=: ~ '" t1: ..... õ: ai", .~ c: (/) 0 f+-o.";::: o t1: =..2 t1: t1: õ:~ .... Cl) ~ +-' +-' '" :::1 t1: 0 ::EO::: ~ ~ ~ 0.. ~o: - "'0 t1: = ð t1:~ 0..= .~ t1: OÕ: <+- = o 0 ~,.;:; Cl) gb ~ .;:; :::1 .- (/)::E « t1: '" o 0.. '" o "'0 = t1: ~ > o E Cl) 0::: +-' = Cl) E -a ~ (/) .. M <=> 00 r-~ 00 0\ ~ "'0 = t1: = .~ '" Cl) a = .2 +-' t1: .... o 0.. >:: UJ+-, - = ~ ~ .- E ="'0 ...c = o :::1 ~ 0 o 0.. ~ E 0_ Cl)<+- ...: 0 (/)0() _ = t1:.- ",¡:: 0·- o..E '" .... '- ~ 00,. '¢ o '¢ C'I~ V) ~ <+-2 00::: +-'U 5UJ Et..L.. t'-' t1:"'O 0..t1: ~ 0 00:::", t1: == = "'0 t1: 0 ï: 0::: .;:; o +-' t1: _ '" 0 t.L..t1::.= ~Oo.. '"'" U 0.. ~+-'« UJ ~...: '-' UJ E :=: ca ~ E :2 0.. .... ... ~O'"'" o..-U t..L....J 8^oo .... r- '-' go Þ '" a = ~ t..L.. :::1 0:::,-,0 -=u .s 0 ~ ='- .- ~+-'o E t1: :::1 ='§..J o 0..""; .... ~ (/) > t1: -a = ... = u.Jr-t1: V) o 00 '¢~ 00 C'I ~ z o - E- U ;J 0:: E- 00 Z o u r.5 ZE- -Z Q~ S~ ~~ ~í-' Z< Oz ¡:< <~ e=E- Uu ¡:í:; 0::0 <0:: ~~ U ~ _00 ...;¡Z ~< ;J"';¡ ~~ - - ~ 00 < :I: 0.. -a = t1: = o +-' t1: .... t1: 0.. Cl) .... 0.. = .2 ..... t1: o t.:: o Cl) 0.. (/) ~ co = "'~ 0 c -..;:: t1: 0 õ:~ Cl) g(/) '- .... õ2 :::1 0 .... t1: +-' .... '" +-' = = o 0 uu \C o C'I V) '¢ ~ o '¢ o~ r- ~ '" 0() = +-' ~ Cl) ::E o .D :::1 0.. "'0 = t1: Cl) Cl) +-' ...: E E o U >-. .... o '" > "'0 « ,~ .D :::1 0.. r- <=> <=> \C Vi ~ o \C o r-.:' IF) - ~ 3 '" t o 0.. ~ 0::: "'0 = t1: "'~ 0() = +-' ~ ~ ::E 1'f ~1' ? f 11 ·f ~JG ~ 1~ 11 ~ = ~ E Cl) 0() t1: = t1: ::E +-' o Cl) .õ' .... 0.... 00 1 ø <i1 ::t U E-< - ¡:Q - := ~ ~ E-- U ~ ~ o ~ Q., z >0 E--- z~~ ~~,.J °o~ UE--~ ~oo~ -~::r: U~U :3~00 .~ E--~ oo~ U ~ o ,.J > < E-- --- Q W W U o z~ 00 -!- E-w ~~ ,.J!- Q.,O ~z o~ U~ ¡r. ~ ;.; ;.; ~ '-' z o - E-- Q., ë2 U 00 ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ E-- CJ) c: ø z - Eo- E-< - ~ ~ ~ ø.. Q Z ..( Z ø - 1f.1 ~ Q ..... o o ¿o'd .... c: - 0 o ._ '- ..... ~ ~ ()- ~õ ê:u (I 0 èõ.. 0.. E c: ~ (I 0 § C/) '';::; '';::; >; ~ (l1-- E 0 0 1-1i:j(/) <2:;1: c: èO (I - 0- ~o::~ .c 0 ()o ~:t5- '- (I Lt.. (I () ~ >.- c: <r::õ..O 0. '- ~.......1i:j o ...... ::s .;; .;:¡ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ C/) ~ o o ~ 00 C/) ~ o o ~ 00 ..... " ::s <r:: o '" (I .... õ: C/) o .~ ..... (I c: I- o .=: 2'-- r.I) C/) c: '- .2 o 1i:j c: ::s (I- - (I 0.. > I-UJ o 0 t;E (I 0 ¿o::: 2~ 8- {;3ö::; -"0 ~ c: o (I o.c: .~ (I Oõ: '- c: o 0 ~'';::; o ~ è '';::; b5~ C/)~ ..:.:: o o ~ o "0 c: (I .... 8¡ '" o o .... .2 1i:j I- o 0.. ;< UJ..... (I c: c..> 0 .- E c:" ...c: c c..> ::s 2 0 o 0.. o E 0_ 0'- ."t:: 0 C/)öl) c (I .- '" :t:: 0'- o..E '" l- .- 0 00.. "<:t C/) ..:.:: o o ~ o N ........ '-0::: 00:: -u ijUJ ELt.. t'-' (I" o.(I o 0 00:::", (I == c: "0 (I 0 ï: 0:: '';::; .2t;~ Lt..(I~ ~ 0 0. ........u 0. ~t;<r:: UJ (I."t:: '-' UJ E ."t:: (I t E~o.. I- I- 00........ o..ëï:~ 8~C/) I- E- '-' 50 þ en 0 C o Lt.. ::s 0::,-,0 -cu .s 0 0 ij '';::; 'ü E (I ::s c5.....J o 0....... .= ~ C/) >(I"o C I- c: [.IJE--(I V) en ..:.:: o o ~ \0 ("") rÆ Z ..( ....:¡ Q., Z o - E- U => c::: E- (/) Z o U e" Z - Q Q - ¡:Q ~E- Zz o~ ¡:~ -<~ Q.,e" -..( ~z E-..( c:::~ ~Eo- Uu -~ ....:¡.., ¡:QO =>c::: Q.,Q., - - ¡.;¡ (/) -< :I: Q., ..."" -0 c: (I c: .2 ..... (I I- (I 0. o I- 0.. c: o '';::; (I () !..i: c..> o 0. (/) ~ CO C C/)~ 0 c'';::; (I c..> õ:~ o §C/) ._ I- üS ::s () I- (I ..... I- en _ C C o 0 uu \0 en ..:.:: o o ~ o "<:t ~ Z ~ Z - ~ (/) ..( = ø.. <r:: (I '" o 0. en o "0 c: (I (I > o E o 0:: - c: o E "0 o C/) 01 ("") en èO C '';::; o o ~ .~ .D ::s 0.. " C (I o o .E E E o u è o en > "0 ~ .~ .D ::s 0.. en t o 0. o 0:: "0 c: (I en" èO c: ..... o o ¿ .: C o E o èO (I C (I ¿ ü o 'õ' I- 0.. r- 00 '-' -....I WORK AUTHORIZATION NO. 13 St. Lucie County Port and Airport Authority C-92-04-300 TAYLOR CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT Pursuant to that certain Agreement Between County and Engineer for Taylor Creek Restoration Project Data Collection and Material Testing (the DAgreement") between St. Lucie County (the "County") and Williams Hatfield & Stoner, Inc., (The "Engineer") dated April 20, 1992, the Engineer agrees to provide the Scope of Services described in Exhibit A for the Compensation described in Exhibit B. All services provided under this Work Authorization shall be completed according to the schedule described in Exhibit C. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Engineer has affIxed his, its, or their names, or name, on the dates below. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: ENGINEER BY: Print Name: Williams, Hatfield & Stoner, Inc. Date: '-" .....I , Page 1 of5 Revised 2/15/00 .,.... -~ .., ,. EXHIBIT A ST. LUCIE COUNTY TAYLOR CREEK RESTORATION PROJECT DATA COLLECTION, SEDIMENT REMOVAL FEASIBILITY SCOPE OF WORK General Project Description The overall goal of this portion of the Restoration Project is to collect data which will ultimately be used to evaluate and design for the removal and disposal of accumulated sediments to achieve previously defined design depths in Taylor Creek, Fort Pierce, Florida The Taylor Creek restoration project area, as defined in this scope, extends from the western right-of-way of the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW) to the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) Canal No. C-25 spillway and the Fort Pierce Farms Water Control District (FPFWCD) Canal No.1 (referred to as F-1) spillway. The reaches of the project are defined as follows: · Reach No.1: The area between Florida East Coast Railroad (FECRR) Bridge and the western right-of-way of the Intracoastal Waterway (ICW). · Reach No.2: the area between the U.S. #1 bridge and the spillway at the C-25 Canal and submerged weir at the F-1 canal. · Reach No.3: The area between the submerged weir at the F-1 Canal and the F-1 Canal spillway. Reach No. 1 will involve the removal of approximately 90,000 cubic yards (c.y.) of sediment (determined in-place volume) from approximately 2,300 linear feet of the previously designed navigation channel (approximately -12.5 ft MSL). The width of the design channel is 140 feet from the FECRR Bridge to a point approximately 1810 feet downstream, and the average channel width tapers to 100 feet from this point to the ICW. The average depth of the sediment is estimated to be between six and seven feet throughout this channel. Reach No. 2 will involve the removal of approximately 80,000 c.y to re-establish the design channel depth (approximately -12.5 ft MSL). The width of the design channel is 140 feet for this reach. The sediment for Reach No.3 will also be evaluated and considered for muck removal. The project will also evaluate the existence of fine-grained, organic sediment (muck) that may exist between the north and south banks of Reach No.1 & 2. The removal of this muck will be included in the future permitting process. '-" ....., , Page2of5 Revised 2/15/00 ,. The project will also determine the approximate volume and removal feasibility of muck sediments from the areas approximately 1,000 linear feet west of the spillway for the F-1 and C-25 canal. To accomplish the above goals, project work will be divided into the following tasks: PHASE I: DATA COLLECTION AND MATERIAL TESTING Task 1: Review Available Information, Pre-application Meeting with Applicable Regulatory Agencies, Sample Collection & Evaluation, Flocculent Selection, Physical/Engineering and Chemical Characterization for Sediments in Taylor Creek. Task 2: Sediment Removal and Disposal Alternatives, Dewatering Techniques and Potential Beneficial Uses of Dredged Materials for Taylor Creek The project will be initiated with a kick-off meeting, at which time the proposed scope, schedule, project coordination procedures, and reporting requirements for S1. Lucie County (SLC). PHASE I: DATA COLLECTION AND MATERIAL TESTING Task 1: Review Available Information, Pre-application Meeting with Applicable Regulatory Agencies, Sample Collection & Evaluation, Flocculent Selection, Physical/Engineering and Chemical Characterization for Sediments in TAYLOR CREEK. Task 1.1 Review Available Information and hold Pre-application Meetings with Applicable Regulatory Agencies for TAYLOR CREEK. CONSULTANT shall perform a collection of literature, obtain reports, maps, aerial photographs, design plans, and other relevant information that will be used to make applications for various permits (ERP, FDOT, FECRR, SLC etc.) for Taylor Creek. The following agencies may be contacted to obtain the relevant information: · City of Fort Pierce · S1. Lucie County (SLC) · Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) · United States Army Corps of Engineers (USACOE) · Florida Department of Environmental Protection (FDEP) · Florida East Coast Rail Road (FECRR) · South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) · U.S. Coast Guard · Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) · U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service H:\PROJECTS\3033\3033.13\Half-restoration scope - Genera\.doc '-' .."", . ~ . Page3 of 5 Revised 2/15/00 . Department of State, Division of Archives, History and Records Management Pre-application meetings will be held with FDEP, USACOE, SFWMD and SLC. Deliverables: . Preliminary ERP, FDOT, FECRR and SLC Permit Information. Task 1.2 Sediment and Water Quality Data Review, Additional Sample Collection, Flocculant Selection, and Sediment Qualification for TAYLOR CREEK. CONSUL T ANT shall review available reports and data concerning the sediments and water quality of the project area prior to any further field sampling. This information will be used to assist in refining additional information for the sediments to be dredged and for use in the ERP. Based on earlier investigations of sediment characteristics, chemical polymers will be evaluated by CONSUL T ANT to properly design different disposal options and supplement the ERP required to dredge the creek. Once the relevant information is reviewed and summarized, additional in situ field sediment sampling will be conducted for areas outside of the design channel (the banks of Taylor Creek (Reach No.1, 2 & 3) north and south of the design channel and west of the C-25 and F-1 spillway). Seven (7) locations will be sampled at various depths as required by the regulatory agencies for chemical characterization. (Two (2) composite samples to -12.5 MSL; one (1) in Reach No.1 and Reach No.2; and five (5) muck samples; one (1) in Reaches 1,2 & 3, one (1) west of C-25 spillway, and one (1) west of the F-1 spillway). All sample locations will be identified and mapped using a Global Positioning System. Depending on the depth and sediment, samples will be collected either using a piston tube sampler or vibracoring. Five (5) water samples will be collected for chemical characterization. One (1) sample from each reach will be collected along with one (1) sample west of each spillway. Collected samples will be placed in jars, sealed and returned to appropriate testing laboratories for chemical and physical characterization. All samples will be collected in accordance with FDEP approved Comprehensive Quality Assurance Plan (CompQAP). Muck sediment from the banks north and south of the design channel throughout Taylor Creek will be considered for removal. Deliverables: . Additional permit application information. . Results of sediment and water samples for physical and chemical testing. H:\PROJECTS\3033\3033.13\Half-restoration scope - General.doc '-" ...., , . . Page 4 of 5 Revised 2/15/00 Task 1.3 PhysicallEngineering and Chemical Characterization in T AYLOR CREEK CONSUL T ANT shall conduct laboratory testing to determine the following physical and engineering properties of individual and composite samples (From Task 1.2) to assist in determining handling characteristics, disposal behavior and alternative uses. Twelve (12) individual and/or composite samples will be tested for the following properties: · Moisture/-200 sieve · Specific Gravity · Atterberg Limits · Organic Content · Grain Size Testing will be conducted in accordance with appropriate American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) standards. The samples will be classified according to the Unified Soil Classification System. In addition, 30-Day settling tests with and without chemical flocculants will also be performed to further refine expected sediment slurry behavior at the disposal site and return water impacts. The chemical characteristics of the sediments will be used to supplement the ERP. Additional chemical characteristics of the creek water and sediment will be determined for selected samples from the study area as needed for determining any specialized handling and disposal requirements. Chemical testing will focus on determining the concentrations of selected inorganic nutrients, heavy metals, oil and grease, pesticides, herbicides and polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (P AHs). Toxicity Characteristic Leaching Procedure (TCLP) test will be performed to determine possible environmental impacts to the ground water at the disposal site. Chemical and TCLP testing for two composite sediment and water samples are included. The chemical data will be important in assessing potential implications to environmental permitting, if any, and assessment of various beneficial use options for the dewatered sediment. CONSULTANT shall prepare a letter report for all aspects of Task 1.2 and 1.3. Deliverables: · Identification of muck sediment (north and south of Taylor Creek design channel; muck identification is already complete within the Taylor Creek channel) in the project area. · Sediment physical and chemical characterization data. · Letter-Report summary of data, analysis and conclusions. H:\PROJECTS\3033\3033.13\Half-restoration scope - Genera\.doc '-' ,...", Page 5 of5 ~ Revised 2/15/00 .." TASK 2: Sediment Removal and Disposal Alternatives, Dewatering Techniques and Potential Beneficial Uses of Dredged Materials for TAYLOR CREEK The laboratory chemical and physical/engineering test data and estimated muck volume for Reach No's 1 & 2 will be used to determine the sediment volume increase (bulking factor) due to dredging as well as the settling and dewatering characteristics of the dredged sediments at the disposal site. The bulking factor depends on the method of dredging (mechanical or hydraulic), along with the settling and dewatering characteristics, and it will be used to determine the capacity needed for the disposal site. Depending on the physical characterization of the sediments, chemical flocculants will be evaluated to enhance dewatering performance of the dredged material and the quality of the return water. Whole Body Toxicity testing will be conducted for the recommended chemical flocculant. The toxicity testing will be further refined to determine the optimal use of polymers to avoid impacts to the aquatic fauna. Testing will be performed in accordance with approved FDEP methods. This approach will be assessed with disposal concepts such as hydrocyc1oning to separate the fine- and coarse-grained materials for beneficial uses. This task will evaluate possible uses of the dredged sediments for public benefit. Hydraulic dredging appears to be the logical and economical method for removal of the sediments from the navigation channel of Taylor Creek in combination with sand separation and/or dewatering systems. Deliverables: · Dredging and disposal alternatives (recommend alternative to SLC). · Potential separation of sediments using hydrocycloning and/or flocculants. · Beneficial uses of dredge materials. · Letter-report H:\PROJECTS\3033\3033. I3\Half-restoration scope - General.doc .. ., m ..... m - ~ >< w ..... o w "") o ~ a. z ~ºz z.....~o ::» - ..... °Oe:( o.....(/) w(/)Z -ww o~a. 3~:æ . w 0 .....wo (/)~ o ~ o ..J ~ ..... ~ w W 0: o 0: o ..J ~ t- t- Z <C It-t- m..Jen :):)0 en en 0 z o o t- Z <C t-.... ..Jen :)0 enO Z o o z o ~ a.. 0:: o en w c oð Ó z ~ en c:( t- o z w en <C :J: Do '-" o <0 M cD fA- o N ~ Ñ N fA- o ~ t--. 10 N fA- ..."" o '<t <0. ~ M fA- o '<t o ~ fA- c:0> ...... o>.Q ,§ c: c:.ç: £ÕQ) 0 ñjQ) c: Q) ~ c:Q) :P Oc: .ê 0 Q) õ .- ~ ~ .- "0 ~ ~ () g¡ £ '3. ~ :g ~ .!:! c: Q)W I/) a.Q) ~"O Q) .Q ã. 15 ë cP ·õ c: Õ 1§ ~ .~ ~ £ æ ~ (\]. ~ '3. (f.) ~ 'õ "0_ '9 .S; Õ ~ a. -Q. Q) ..... Q):P U cp:ß.C/) ,g~ ex:::d ñj ~ 'õ õ .E "0 m J!J ã) ill .2 Q. æ~ c: æ-s O(\](f.)W E ·0>Q)0 0> ............Q) c: A' ._ c: Q) ""'" c: u.. ~ o ..... ã) ...... 0 .... (\] U U :P~C/)I'S :pex:: 'fij-S (\] 0 ...... .¡:: (\] Q) ::s 0 ex:: "0 E~æ~ EJ5 o~gæ S::s-S(\] S~ Q)~LL>-O> c:C)o~ c:= _<c: Q; æ g ~ ~ Q; 2: ~ ~ Õ I- .~ ~ J5Q)ü:UWJ5<W:>~5~W (\] - _ ñj W (\] ~ W "0 Q) ..... .- W =.0 c: oex::=:t::ex:: c:= c: o>ex:: (\] ~ 0 .- U (\] ~ U (\] 0 0 c: () ~'3.iii~ex::~I/)ex::ëUiii~ex:: ~ a.~~o ~ g>O Q)~ 2 ~O Q) < (\] U ...J Q) :P ...J E a.!E .- ...J 's; :5 ¡jj "0 ~ 's; $ ~ 'õ E ~ ~ ~ Q) .- c: ..... Q) ..... Q) (\] ~ ..... ex::~oð(\]I-ex::~I-C/)(f.)OQ.1- ~ C'! ~ ..... o I/) Q) I/) :J ñj . 'õ I/)¡¡:: ~ Q) .- c: mQ)~ c:a::I~ a; - W ...... .!!! W -......ex:: ~~U mõex:: oCl..O g. "0 ...J ._ c: >- 0(\]« "OI/)l- c:Q)~ (\] ::s 0 _ 0"..... (\] ï:: I/) ~13]! EQ)a; Q)I-...... ex:: 0> (\] ......c:~ c: '¡:: "0 Q) Q) Q) Em 0> .- ~ "0 ~Q)~ C/)OO ëj z ¡::: en w I- ..J <C æ w ~ :IE c Z <C Z o ~ o W ..J ..J o o <C ~ C - - w en <C :J: a.. ~ ~ ~ ('II o o II) ø; ..... fA- o o . r: fA- o o -- 1.0 ~ -- N <:) <:) ot_ CD 00 4IIt- ¡; ~ ,g :s en -I c( I- o I- > Q) ~ cc - :is :ë x W .- M ~ M M o M .- I/) õ Q) 'õ' ~ a. :;:; o e "0 u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ u ~ ~ Z >0 ~~ z~~ ~~~ °O~ u~~ ~oo~ ~~= u~u ~~oo ~~ ~~ u ~ o ~ ~ ~ Q z~ OU ~~ ~~ ~o ~E- ~¡;oi¡ ~~ Ob uz ::i!: ~ ¡.. ~ ¡;oi¡ ¡;oi¡ ð z o ~ ~ ~ u 00 ~ ~ ~ 00 ;5 ÇJ z .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ë2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z o .... ~ u ~ ~ ~ o u < ~ ~ 0.0 ~ ..... ~ Q)~ ~ ¡:: ¡:: 0 0..... ..... to:: «i .., u~ :'=:0., 8:u ~ Q) ,_ Q) 0.. I-< ¡::; ¡:: ~ æ 0 ¡::n 00 .+:;: o n U ..... >. Q) «i 1-. Õ ê~~ ~~§ "sQ)"3 Q) ~ U - Q) U ~-..9 :-:::~µ.. ~ U n >..... ¡:: <: -a..g o..«i ~<:.a ';> ;S ~ Q)..... > ~~~ .. - ~ ~ ~ g: ""-11 I:IJ ~ ~ N I:IJ ~ ~ If) I:IJ ta '5 o.o«i .§ ~ Q)"'d «i Q) ~ 0.0 Q)-g o I-< nO 1:IJt+-< ~ 0 ..... I:IJ «i Q) e I:IJ Q)::J '=:ta <: 'õ tat.;::: I:IJ Q) o ¡:: 0..Q) I:IJCQ Ôta "'d '-@ §£ ta 0 >~ ~] ~ ~ E g. Q)..... e.ã ..... U "'d Q) ~E-- N \ v',,... '-;. :3¥(;;;~:~. - .'. ... "';,¡ . c ..., "-' TOP OF SLOPE n'PE 1 PLANTING . EL. 16.4 ± . . . '. '. . ' . '. . , . . . .," , , . . . :~'7'"\El.. 15.4 ±T7'~.'~' ~'--:-:-'~" .. . ~<...................................................,................................................................. I # ..(:....>~·.·~.~~4E~ 14.4~~~~·-4-~··~··~ . .(....../ '" >I<- \ -"'- -"'- --'" -'" ~ '" EL 13.4 '. (::::). '" / . TYPE3 PLANllNG · . J::::.:J. 1 TYPE HLANllNG· - -j:-\:J ~ ì EXCAVA1EO AREA PLANTING DENSITIES: TYPE 1 PLANTING: 150 PLANTS/ACRE TYPE 2 PLAN 11 NG: f50 PLANlS/ACRE T'l'PE :3 PlANl1NG: 120 PLANlS/ACRE T'l'PE 4 PLANl1NG: 120 PLANlS/ ACRE TYPE 2 PLANTING PLAN TYPE 1 TYPE 2 TYPE 3 TYPE 4 PlANTING PLANlJIIG Pl..AN'1m PlANTING SPARTtlA BAKER! SAYoQt4S$ DUCK POTATOE WATER ULY SPIKE RUSH SOfT RVSH PlCKEREL¥ÆED ARROWROOT ULl Y NAlDENCANE ST. JOHN'S WORT SPAT1ERDOQ( SWNoP UL Y 2-14-94 SECTION 8575UTT.OWG Ta> Of SlOPE 1-- 4 EDGE OF WA LITTORAL' SHELF PLANTING PLAN FOR FRANK STEWART MINING OPERATION (1!:CULPEPPER " -~·--TERPENING.'Nc. CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 805 VIRGINIA AV.. sum: 15 FORT PIERCE. FLORIDA 34962 (407) 464-3537 , "':..:. ..., z \ . .. 'I" ' ,. , \\ .f - o . LOCATION MAP 14' UMlTS Of SE£O AND MULCH I' 14' II' ,,' UTTORAL SHELF PLAN'TIHG PlAN EL 2U WI. 1tR n.EVA TIOH t7.4:t \ 'P " ~ ~.., ~~ ..~ t~ . .~f _,,~",.....,._. ~ï. LUCIE COUNTY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 1HI$ DOCUMÐn' HAS BEEN REVIEWED WITH RWECT TO ~UNJY ENQINEEIIINQ IEQUIIWIENT. AND: .. · APPIIWED [J IS APPMWED AS NOTED C . lOT APPIOVED [J SHALl. IE R&VIaf.D . .. SUBMITTED SHOUlD ACTUAl SITE CONDITIONS DIFFER FROM THOSE RE. PRESENTED HEREIN, ANt APPROVALS ttfREON ARE - NUU AND VOID AND CONaTRUCTION Of IMPROVEMENTS COVEREI ., SUCH APPROVAL SHAU. CWE UNTil lUNa ~ _ . APPIIMD . THE COIINJY EMIN., . APPROVAL DOES NOT RELIEVE THE D£SIGHING ~... REsPONSl81utY FOR CORR£1ATlOH Of AlL QETAU. ~ SIONS, AND CONDITIONS; NOR DOfJ IT RELIEVE TIlE CØfI' STRUCTOI FIIOII CONFORMING TO APPlICABU COUNTY .. QUII£MÐCTI UIWS SO IOTED IÐfOI It CXIII1I ,.._ COUHTY £MINEER ~~f·Qe..k 'f:~,/* CROSS HATCHING INDICA 1ES LMlTS OIF [XCAVAI1ON õ,t- WI. YER L£'ÆL. ---.- - -- -- EXIStING GROUND ~ ~ "a. . ....-- ~ - - .... -- 'tiw' AGENDA REQUEST IT~ NO. 6 þ DA TE:February 15, 2000 REGULAR [XX] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Donald G. Cole Property Acquisition Manager SUBJECT: Environmentally Significant Land Program Indrio North Savannas Project FCT#95-052-P56 Stewart Parcel- Tax ID# 1408-343-0002-000/3 BACKGROUND: Please see attached background memorandum. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available in account #382-3915-561000-310035 PREVIOUS ACTION: August 1, 1995 - Received Board of County Commission authorization to submit Grant Application to Florida Communities Trust (FCT) for the purchase ofIndrio North Savannas Project. March 26, 1996 - Received Board of County Commission approval of the Conceptual Approval Agreement with Florida Communities Trust to purchase the Indrio North Savannas Project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests that the Board determine if they will accept the Option Agreement in the amount of $258,910.00 for the Stewart Parcel highlighted in purple on the attached map. If accepted, staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct staff to close the transaction and record the document in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. COMMISSION ACTION: ~] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: 4-0 (Barnes Absent) 0 gl M. Anderson Approved subj ect to FCT Approval pertaining COU~Ad inistrator ($5,000 less of(4~sessed value) to qillbÇ>a. ~ ; ~ Review and ~prov~/' J¡tlc /! ' [X] County Attorney: ,\.. [X] Management & Budget :<2 I 0/7:!JJ lXl Public Works ~.! " I l_ ~ IÎU'-·· . Originating Dept: . ~ [Xl LeÜmre SVR . [X] Comm. Develop: ", r ~ '\ J \ ...-' ) [X] Finance: (check for copy only, if applicable) C'0j r;'i" Effective 5/96 - ~è ~}rt ... - '-' ~ PROPERTY ACQUISITION DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Donald G. Cole, Property Acquisition Manager DATE: February 15,2000 SUBJECT: Environmentally Significant Land Program InOOo North Savannas Project FCT#95-052-P56 Stewart Parcel- Tax ID # 1408-343-0002-000/3 BACKGROUND: On March 26, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Conceptual Approval agreement with Florida Communities Trust (FCT) for the purchase of 228 properties within the Indrio North Savanna Project. The Board authorized the use of $600,000 of the County Environmentally Significant Land (ESL) funds to match a 50% grant from FCT. On the attached map of the project, the parcel that is the subject of this request is highlighted in purple. This parcel was added to the project boundary last year when the owner, Mr. Ben Stewart offered it to the County for the assessed value as it was listed on the 1998 Tax Roll. Mr. Stewart and his son Frank, have owned and operated a sand mining business (Tozour Road Mine) from this site for many years. They also owned property adjacent to this parcel. This adjacent parcel (the "Lake") was the area that was actually mined. Mr. Stewart agreed to donate the "Lake" Parcel to the County when his mining pennit expired. Please note the attached memorandum from the Public Works Director. As referenced in Mr. Wazny's memo, many staff hours were involved in the reclamation ofthe mine. Not only was the Engineering Division involved but so was Code Enforcement and the Environmental Lands Specialist. As requested by the BOCC at the February 8th meeting, Acquisition staff has negotiated with Mr. Stewart to accept the Option Agreement at $5,000.00 below his original asking price. The assessed value is $263,910.00. The Grant Agreement with Florida Communities '-" ...." Trust "FCT"does not allow us to divulge the appraised value but please note that the Maximum Approved Value approved by FCT is substantially higher than the assessed value. The new negotiated offer is $5,000.00 less than the assessed value. The Option Agreement for the subject parcel is attached for your review. RECOMMENDA TION 1 CONCLUSION: Staff requests that the Board detennine if they will accept the Option Agreement in the amount of $258,910.00 for the Stewart Parcel highlighted in purple on the attached map. If accepted, staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chainnan to execute the agreement and direct staffto close the transaction and record the document in the Public Records of S1. Lucie County, Florida. Respectfully submitted: ~tJvÆ ~h~ Donald G. Cole Property Acquisition Manager CC: County Administrator County Attorney Community Development Director Leisure Services Director Finance Director Management & Budget Manager G:\ACQ\ WP\ YVONNE\ENVLANDS\NINDRIO\AGENDAS\BCC Feb 15,2000. wpd '-' ..", PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM DATE: Don Cole, Acquisitions Manager Ray Wazny, Public Works Director ¿ý February 10, 2000 <! TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Stewart Sand Mine Costs Noted below are costs associated with pursuing the closing of the Stewart Sand Mine: 1. Staff costs for Richard Bouchard, Coastal Engineer: $1,530. 2. Staff costs for Steve Fousek, Environmental Land Specialist: $200. 3. Staff time, Ron Harris, County Surveyor: $1,500 4. Code Enforcement staff costs: $1,250. Total estimated staff cost to pursue reclamation of the mine is $4,480. Please call me at 1485 if you have any questions. RW:jr '-' 'wi Project: Imirio North Savannas Project #: 95-052-P56 Parcel: Stewart Contract #: Property Tax I.D.#: 1408-343-0002-000/3 OPTION AGREEMENT FOR SALE AND PURCHASE THIS AGREEMENT is made this _ day of , 2000, between Ben Stewart, the unremarried surviving spouse of Diane L. Stewart whose address is 1420 Coral Oak Lane, Vero Beach, FL 32963 as "Seller", and the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, a political subdivision within the State of Florida, whose address is 2300 Viq~inia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida 34982, as "Purchaser". 1. GRANT OF OPTION. Seller hereby grants to Purchaser the exclusive option to purchase the real property located in St. Lucie County, Florida, described in Exhibit "A", together with all improvements, easements and appurtenances ("Property"), in accordance with the provisions of this Agreement. This Option Agreement becomes legally binding upon execution by the parties but exercise of the option is subject to approval by the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County. 2. OPTION TERMS. The option payment is $100.00 ("Option Payment"). The Option Payment, in the form of a county warrant, will be forwarded to Treasure Coast Abstract and Title Insurance Company upon its receipt by Local Government from the Clerk of Court of St. Lucie County. The option may be exercised during the period beginning with the Purchaser's approval of this Agreement by the Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County and ending on March 31, 2000 ("Option Expiration Date"), unless extended by other provisions of this Agreement. In the event the Purchase Price (as hereinafter defined in paragraph 3.) is not available by the Option Expiration Date the period of exercise of the option may be extended until such funds become available, not to exceed 60 days after the Option Expiration Date, by written notice to Seller. 3. TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE. The total purchase price ("Total Purchase Price") for the Property is Two Hundred Fifty Eight Thousand Nine HundredTen and no/tOO Dollars ($258,910.00) which, after reduction by the amount of the Option Payment, will be paid by the Purchaser at closing to Seller in the manner set forth herein. The total purchase price is based on the assumption that the property contains at least 1.2.42 total acres. The parties agree to adjust the purchase price if the actual acreage differs from the assumed acreage. The determination of the final Total Purchase Price may be made after the completion and approval of the survey mentioned in paragraph 5. This Agreement is also contingent upon Purchaser's funds for closing being available at closing. Should the Purchaser's funds not be available for any reason, Purchaser or Seller may elect to terminate this Agreement by written notice to the parties without liability to any party. . The Purchaser shall take fee simple title to the Property at the closing. Conveyance of the Property in fee simple from Seller to Purchaser will take place at the closing, in exchange for the payments to made by Purchaser to Seller at closing, as set forth above in this paragraph. 4.A. ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT. Purchaser shall, at its sole cost and expense and at least 30 days prior to the Option Expiration Date, perform an environmental site assessment of the Property which meets the standard of practice of the American Society of Testing Materials ("ASTM"). Purchaser shall use the services of competent, professional consultants with expertise in the environmental site assessing process to determine the existence and extent, if any, of Hazardous Materials on the Property. The examination of hazardous materials contamination shall be performed to 1 '-' .."" the standard of practice of the ASTM. For Phase I environmental site assessment, such standard of practice shall be the ASTM Practice E 1527. If the Findings and Conclusions section of the assessment reports evidence of recognized environmental conditions, then a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment shall be perfonned to address any suspicions raised in the Phase I environmental site assessment and to confinn the presence of contaminants on site. For purposes of this Agreement "Hazardous Materials" shall mean any hazardous or toxic substance, material or waste of any kind or any other substance which is regulated by any Environmental Law (as hereinafter defined in paragraph 4.B.). The environmental site assessment shall be certified to Purchaser and the date of certification shall be within 45 days before the date of closing. 4.B. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. In the event that the environmental site assessment provided for in paragraph 4.A. confinns the presence of Hazardous Materials on the Property, Purchaser, at its sole option, may elect to tenninate this Agreement and neither party shall have any further obligations under this Agreement. Should Purchaser elect not to tenninate this Agreement, Seller shall, at his sole cost and expense and prior to the exercise of the option and closing, promptly commence and diligently pursue any assessment, clean up and monitoring of the Property necessary to bring the Property into full compliance with any and all applicable federal, state or local laws, statutes, ordinances, rules, regulations or other governmental restrictions regulating, relating to, or imposing liability or standards of conduct concerning Hazardous Materials ("Environmental Law"). However, should the estimated cost of clean up of Hazardous Materials exceed a sum which is equal to 10% of the Total Purchase Price as stated in paragraph 3., Seller may elect to tenninate this Agreement and no party shall have any further obligations under this Agreement. In the event that Hazardous Materials placed on the Property prior to closing are discovered after closing, Seller shall remain obligated hereunder, with such obligation to survive the closing and delivery and recording of the deed described in paragraph 8. of this Agreement and Purchaser's possession of the Property, to diligently pursue and accomplish the clean up of Hazardous Materials in a manner consistent with all applicable Environmental Laws and at Seller's sole cost and expense. Further, in the event that neither party elects to tenninate this Agreement as provided above, Seller shall indemnify and save hannless and defend Purchaser, its officers, servants, agents and employees from and against any and all claims, suits, actions, damages, liabilities, expenditures or causes of action of whatsoever kind arising from Hazardous Materials placed on the Property prior to closing whether the Hazardous Materials are discovered prior to or after closing. Seller shall defend, at his sole cost and expense, any legal action, claim or proceeding instituted by any person against Purchaser as a result of any claim, suit, or cause of action for injuries to body, life, limb or property for which Hazardous Materials placed on the Property prior to closing are alleged to be a contributing legal cause. Seller shall save Purchaser hannless from and against all judgments, orders, decrees, attorney's fees, costs, expenses and liabilities in and about any such claim, suit, investigation or defense thereof, which may be entered, incurred or assessed as a result of the foregoing. 5. SURVEY. Purchaser may have the Property surveyed at its expense. If the survey ("Survey"), certified by a professional land surveyor licensed by the State of Florida, shows any encroachment on the Property or that improvements intended to be located on the Property encroach on the land of others, the same shall be treated as a title defect. 6. TITLE INSURANCE. Purchaser shall, at its sole cost and expense and at least 35 days prior to the Option Expiration Date, obtain a marketable title insurance commitment, to be followed by an owner's marketable title insurance policy (ALTA Fonn "B") from a title insurance company, insuring marketable title of Purchaser to the Property in the amount of the Total Purchase Price. Purchaser shall require that the title insurer delete the standard exceptions of such policy referring to: (a) all taxes, (b) unrecorded rights or claims of parties in possession, (c) survey matters, (d) unrecorded easements or 2 '-' .."" claims of easements, and (e) unrecorded mechanics' liens. Notwithstanding any other provision herein to the contrary, Purchaser will only be obligated to require that the title insurer delete the standard exceptions for survey matters and unrecorded easements and claims of easements if Purchaser provides a Survey ofthe Property which meets the requirements of Section 627.7842(1)(a), Florida Statutes. 7. DEFECTS IN TITLE. If the title insurance commitment or survey furnished to Purchaser pursuant to this Agreement discloses any defects in title which are not acceptable to Purchaser, Seller shall, within 90 days after notice from Purchaser, remove said defects in title. Seller agrees to use diligent effort to correct the defects in title within the time provided therefor, including the bringing of necessary suits. If Seller is unsuccessful in removing the title defects within said time or if Seller fails to make a diligent effort to correct the title defects, Purchaser shall have the option to either: (a) accept the title as it then is with no reduction in the Total Purchase Price, (b) extend the amount of time that Seller has to cure the defects in title, or (c) tenninate this Agreement, thereupon releasing Purchaser and Seller from all further obligations under this Agreement. 8. INTEREST CONVEYED. At closing, Seller shall execute and deliver to Purchaser a statutory warranty deed in accordance with Section 689.02, Florida Statutes, conveying marketable title to the Property in fee simple free and clear of all liens, reservations, restrictions, easements, leases, tenancies and other encumbrances, except for those that are acceptable encumbrances in the opinion of Purchaser and do not impair the marketability of the title to the Property. The grantee in the Seller's Warranty Deed shall be St. Lucie County. 9. PREPARATION OF CLOSING DOCUMENTS. Upon execution of this Agreement, Seller shall submit to Purchaser a properly completed and executed beneficial interest affidavit and disclosure statement as required by Sections 286.23, and 380.08(2), Florida Statutes. Seller shall prepare the deed described in paragraph 8. of this Agreement, Seller's closing statement and the title, possession and lien affidavit certified to Purchaser and title insurer in accordance with Section 627.7842, Florida Statutes, and an environmental affidavit on fonns provided by the purchaser. The Purchaser shall have the Purchaser's closing statement prepared. All prepared documents shall be submitted to the Purchaser for review and approval at least 30 days prior to the Option Expiration Date. 10. PURCHASER REVIEW FOR CLOSING. Purchaser will approve or reject each item required to be provided by Seller under this Agreement within 30 days after receipt by Purchaser of all of the required items. Seller will have 30 days thereafter to cure and resubmit any rejected item to Purchaser. In the event Seller fails to timely deliver any item, or Purchaser rejects any item after delivery, Purchaser may in its discretion extend the Option Expiration Date. 11. EXPENSES. Seller will pay the documentary revenue stamp tax and all other taxes or costs associated with the conveyance, including the cost of recording the deed described in paragraph 8. of this Agreement and any other recordable instruments which Purchaser deems necessary to assure good and marketable title to the Property. 12. T AXES AND ASSESSMENTS. All real estate taxes and assessments which are or which may become a lien against the Property shall be satisfied of record by Seller at closing. In the event the Purchaser acquires fee title to the Property between January 1 and November 1, Seller shall, in accordance with Section 196.295, Florida Statutes, place in escrow with the county tax collector an amount equal to the current taxes prorated to the date of transfer, based upon the current assessment and millage rates on the Property. In the event the Purchaser acquires fee title to the Property on or after November 1, Seller shall pay to the county tax collector an amount equal to the taxes that are detennined to be legally due and payable by the county tax collector. 3 '-' ....., 13. CLOSING PLACE AND DATE. The closing shall be on or before 30 days after Purchaser exercises the option; provided, however, that if a defect exists in the title to the Property, title commitment, Survey, environmental site assessment, or any other documents required to be provided or completed and executed by Seller, the closing shall occur either on the original closing date or within 60 days after receipt of documentation curing the defects, whichever is later. The date, time and place of closing shall be set by Purchaser. 14. RISK OF LOSS AND CONDITION OF REAL PROPERTY. Seller assumes all risk ofloss or damage to the Property prior to the date of closing and warrants that the Property shall be transferred and conveyed to the Purchaser in the same or essentially the same condition as of the date of Seller's execution of this Agreement, ordinary wear and tear excepted. However, in the event the condition of the Property is altered by an act of God or other natural force beyond the control of Seller, Purchaser may elect, at its sole option, to terminate this Agreement and neither party shall have any further obligations under this Agreement. Seller represents and warrants that there are no parties other than Seller in occupancy or possession of any part of the Property. Seller agrees to clean up and remove all abandoned personal property, refuse, garbage, junk, rubbish, trash and debris from the Property to the satisfaction of Purchaser prior to the exercise of the option by Purchaser. 15. RIGHT TO ENTER PROPERTY AND POSSESSION. Seller agrees that from the date this Agreement is executed by Seller, Purchaser and its agents, upon reasonable notice, shall have the right to enter the Property for all lawful purposes in connection with the this Agreement. Seller shall deliver possession of the Property to the Purchaser at closing. 16. ACCESS. Seller warrants that there is legal ingress and egress for the Property over public roads or valid, recorded easements that benefit the Property. 17. DEF A UL T. If Seller defaults under this Agreement, Purchaser may waive the default and proceed to closing, seek specific performance, or refuse to close and elect to receive the return of any money paid, each without waiving any action for damages, or any other remedy permitted by law or in equity resulting from Seller's default. In connection with any dispute arising out of this Agreement, including without limitation litigation and appeals, Purchaser will be entitled to recover reasonable attorney's fees and costs. 18. BROKERS, Seller warrants that no persons, firms, corporations or other entities are entitled to a real estate commission or other fees as a result of this Agreement or subsequent closing, except as accurately disclosed on the disclosure statement required in paragraph 9. Seller shall indemnify and hold Purchaser harmless from any and all such claims, whether disclosed or undisclosed. 19. RECORDING. This Agreement, or notice of it, may be recorded by Purchaser in the appropriate county or counties. 20. ASSIGNMENT. This Agreement may be assigned by Purchaser, in which event Purchaser will provide written notice of assignment to Seller. This Agreement may not be assigned by Seller without the prior written consent of Purchaser. 21. TIME. Time is of essence with regard to all dates or times set forth in this Agreement. 22. SEVERABILITY. In the event any of the provisions of this Agreement are deemed to be unenforceable, the enforceability of the remaining provisions of this Agreement shall not be affected. 23. SUCCESSORS IN INTEREST. Upon Seller's execution of this Agreement, Seller's heirs, legal 4 ....., ....J representatives, successors and assigns will be bound by it. Upon Purchaser's approval of this Agreement and Purchaser's exercise of the option, Purchaser and Purchaser's successors and assigns will be bound by it. Whenever used, the singular shall include the plural and one gender shall include all genders. 24. ENTIRE AGREEMENT This Agreement contains the entire agreement between the parties pertaining to the subject matter contained in it and supersedes all prior and contemporaneous agreements, representations and understandings of the parties. No supplement, modification or amendment to this Agreement shall be binding unless executed in writing by the parties. 25. WAIVER. Failure of Purchaser to insist upon strict performance of any covenant or condition of this Agreement, or to exercise any right herein contained, shall not be construed as a waiver or relinquishment for the future of any such covenant, condition or right; but the same shall remain in full force and effect. 26. AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE. This Agreement or any modification, amendment or alteration thereto, shall not be effective or binding upon any of the parties hereto until it has been executed by all of the parties hereto. 27. ADDENDUM. Any addendum attached hereto that is signed by the parties shall be deemed a part of this Agreement. 28. NOTICE. Whenever either party desires or is required to give notice unto the other, it must be given by written notice, and either delivered personally or mailed to the appropriate address indicated on the first page of this Agreement, or such other address as is designated in writing by a party to this Agreement. 29. S1 JR VIV AL. The covenants, warranties, representations, indemnities and undertakings of Seller set forth in this Agreement shall survive the closing, the delivery and recording of the deed described in paragraph 8. of this Agreement and Purchaser's possession of the Property. THIS AGREEMENT IS INITlALL Y TRANSMITTED TO THE SELLER AS AN OFFER. IF THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT EXECUTED BY THE SELLER ON OR BEFORE February 15, 2000 . THIS OFFER WILL BE VOID UNLESS THE PURCHASER, AT ITS SOLE OPTION, ELECTS TO ACCEPT THIS OFFER. THE EXERCISE OF THIS OPTION IS SUBJECT TO: (1) AFPROV AL OF THIS AGREEMENT, INCLUDING THE TOTAL PURCHASE PRICE BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY (2) AFPROV AL BY THE PURCHASER OF ALL DOCUMENTS TO BE FURNISHED HEREUNDER BY SELLER. C_:;:J}i ~ ¡j"/ -"'titn?~S~ yv, tness as to Seller THIS IS TO BE A LEGALLY BINDING CONTRACT. IF NOT FULL Y UNDERSTOOD, SEEK THE ADVICE OF AN ATTORNEY PRIOR TO SIGNING. ;4R /A-- ./ Ben Stewart 0---- ~ð~-y:ö -~?¡; ¡J S;c~~N~ Date signed by Seller 5 '-" ...., STATEOF ~ L ) ) - COUNTY OF .s-r: wU'€. ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ) ~~ day of :;;:-eSoruc..f~, 2000, by Ben Stewart who is personally known to me or who has produced a driver's license issued w thin the last five years as identification. '-'-, "', --.;.. -, ~~~-~~ Notary Public T' (~ I ~Q{\"\ c:~ L. ~l '0 \ (Printed, Typed or Stamped Name of Notary Public) Commission No.: (' {' {.¡, '35 9D { My Commission Expires: 5"" { I D / D / ( (NOTARY PUBLIC) SEAL ,". >t:;.~~;~f.~~~~"m~:¡ \~. "=,,,,- " \ 1 ?2:::~!',:\:l ,'_.1...' r PURCHASER BOARD OF COlTNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE CmTNTY, FLORIDA Witness as to Local Government By: Name: Its: Witness as to Local Government Attest: (Clerk or Deputy Clerk) (OFFICIAL SEAL) Approved as to Form and Legality: Date signed by Purchaser By: County Attorney Date: 6 '-" ...., EXHIBIT" A" Legal Description MORE PARTICULAR DESCRIPTION TO BE PROVIDED BY COUNTY SURVEYOR (the following description was taken from the property appraiser's description from the 1998 property tax roll): That part of the North Y2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 in Section 8, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, lying West ofD.S. Highway No.1, LESS that certain property described in OR Book 643, page 603; and That part of the South Y2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Southwest 1/4 in Section 8, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, lying West of State Road 4; and Lot 2 and Tract 14 of Block A, L. W. HALBE LAND, and Lot 7, Block A, L. W. HALBE LAND, lying Easterly of the following described line: From the Southeast corner of Tract 13 of Block A, run West 300 feet to the Southwest corner of Tract 13, thence Northwesterly along the West line of Tracts 12 and 13,422 feet to the Northwest corner of Tract 12, thence West 335 feet, thence Southeasterly 471.70 feet parallel to the West line of Tracts 12 and 13 to the Point of Beginning of the described line, thence South parallel to the West line of Lot 7, 70 feet more or less to the East edge of existing barrow pit, thence meandering along the East edge Southeasterly and Southerly to the intersection of the East edge of the South edge of existing barrow pit, thence South parallel to the West line of Lot 7 to the South line of Block A, and the end of described line; also lying South of the following described line: From the Northeast corner of Lot 6 run West 300 feet to the Point of Beginning of the described line, thence West 335 feet to the end of the described line. 7 '-" ...", ADDENDUM DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (INDIVIDUAL) The following Disclosure Statement is given in compliance with Sections 375.031(1) and 380.08(2), Florida Statutes. The Seller states as follows: 1) That to the best of the Seller's knowledge, all persons who have a financial interest in this real estate transaction or who have received or will receive real estate commissions, attorney's or consultant's fees or any other fees or other henefits incident to the sale of the Property are: Nam.e Address Reason for Payment Amount ~ 2) That to the best of the Seller's knowledge, the following is a true history of all financial transactions (including any existing option or purchase agreement in favor of Seller) concerning the Property which have taken place or will take place during the last five years prior to the conveyance of title to St. Lucie County: Name and Address of Parties Involved D.are Type of Transaction Amount of Transaction ~ SELLER: ~ ~--7' -Ben Stewart BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: By: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney Date: 8 ~ closed T~101'l Executed Agreement ~ N '-' ...", AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. '1 DATE: February 15, 2000 REGULAR ~ PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT (~) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY:Robert Bradshaw SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) :Administration SUBJECT: White City House BACKGROUND: The Administration was requested by the Board of County Commissioners to look into the possibility of relocating and preserving the historical White City structure. PREVIOUS ACTION: N./...A FUND AVAIL. : RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests the Board's directive to relocate the historical White City House to a County property. [ X] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: derson Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: [ ] DENIED 3-1 (Hutchinson - No Barnes - Absent) 1) Waive bid process for time concerns 2) Relocate to corner of property until Board determines appropriate l2~v~~io~ndNithr~~af reasonable time. . t B d t PPO 3) Use funds from cont1.ngency County Atty:{) Managemen & u ge : Purchasing: () Origin. Dept: () Other: () Eff. 6/3/96 " '-' ..."", MEMORANDUM CENTRAL SERVICES TO: Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator FROM: Mike Durette, Director, Central Services DATE: February 1, 2000 SUBJECT: Relocation of structure, 603 Midway Road, to new location Per our conversation Monday, January 31, 2000, regarding the relocation of a historical dwelling to either of two(2) sites owned by St. Lucie County, we have assembled some budgetary figures for your consideration which include the utility hook-ups, limited site development and anticipated building renovations. Not knowing on which site or where the building might be located on the site, these numbers could vary drastically. The figures we have assembled would include connecting utilities to the relocated structure (electric, water and sewer), providing a paved driveway and parking as required by the St. Lucie county land Development Code, constructing stairs and ramps as required for accessibility to the building, adding a second toilet room and renovating the existing toilet facilities to meet F ACBC (Florida Accessibility Code for Building Construction), patching and repairing the exterior walls and roofmg, and repainting the exterior of the building. Included in the utility package would be a septic tank and drainfield with a lift station ($10,000.), water supplied by a well and treated with a water softener package ($5,000.) And overhead electrical service run to the building (no cost). Variables in the utility costs could be changing the overhead service to an underground electric service, which would depend on the distance from the property line and location on site relative to existing pole locations. The most defmitive variable in the paving costs will be the distance in from the property line to the facility. The grade elevation and the necessary amount of imported fill (to meet requirements of SFWMD & DEP) will certainly affect the paving costs. None of the variables have been considered in these costs. '-" ....., Robert Bradshaw Relocation of structure, 603 West Midway Road, to new location February 1, 2000 page 2 of 2 The cost to relocate the structure could exceed $115,000., which are some of the figures we are aware of. Our preliminary totals for the utility work and renovations/additions to the structure are about $80,000., not including the physical relocation of the structure, estimated at $35,000., foundation construction, structural engineering, civil engineering or architectural fees, landscaping, contractor's overhead and profit, or impact and permit fees. Our costs only includes those items noted above pertaining to construction and utility costs. MD:bk '-' "'WI ESTIMATED COST COMPARISON WHITE CITY PARK ECONOMY PROPERTY -Septic System w/lift station $ 8,000 -Septic System w/lift station $ 8,000 -Water/Softener System $ 5,000 - Water/Softener System $ 5,000 -Electric overhead service -Electric overhead service No charge as per FPL No charge as per FPL -Exterior painting $12,000min. -Exterior painting $ 12,000min. -Wood Steps/Ramp ADA $10,000 -Wood Steps/Ramp ADA $10,000 - Toilet renovations/addition -Toilet renovations/addition ADA $20,000 ADA $20,000 -Interior renovations $15,000 -Interior renovations $15,000 -Interior painting $ 5,000 -Interior painting $ 5,000 -Relocating House $35,000 -Relocating House $35,000 *Strictly estimated figures *The only difference in cost would be if we could tie into water and septic system. *Lead base paint found in structure. *Contractor has to be notified on or before February 15th because of scheduling. *Estimated construction for a similar structure would be $100.00 x (2000sf) with an estimated cost of $200,000. I Mike Durette - HISTHOSE.WPD Page 1 I \.of ...., MEMORANDUM To: From: Date: Subject: Board of County Commissioners Mike Leeds, Leisure Services Director February 4, 2000 Relocation of Historical White City House After due consideration and discussion with other departmental staff, Leisure Services would like to offer the following findings and options to the BOCC for their consideration. It will cost approximately $115,000 to transport and renovate the historical White City house. This includes $35,000 for transporting and an additional $80,000 for renovations and upgrades to meet code. It has been determined that the most promising location for the house would be at the Savannas Recreation Area. There would be several options for its use at this location. It could be used as a new gate house, a meeting hall, an animal sanctuary or perhaps could be tied in with the proposed Butterfly House. Relocation of the historical White City Home to White City Park would not be a viable option at this time. The problems we would encounter with placement of the home at this location would include elevation and accessability problems. I Mike Durette - HISTHOSE.WPD ...,.¡ P~ge 21 '-' Consideration has also been given to relocating the house to the Economy Property. Due to the purchase of this property with ESL funds, limited recreational usage has been proposed. The other issue that must be addressed is where the location of the house would be relative to the access point of the property. The proposed access point presently is 600 feet away from the active recreational area. This could bring up issues of lighting, safety, and additional cost. In summary: For maximum usage and benefit to St. Lucie County residents and visitors, the Savannas Recreation Area would seem to be an ideal location. The Economy Property could still be looked at as a possibility, but there are many issues that would need to be addressed and the amount of usage is contingent on several factors including that of the access location. It would seem that White City Park is not really a viable option at this time. If you have any further questions or concerns, please contact us. Attachment: Proposed Recreational Area Locations For The Economy Property cc: Robert Bradshaw, Assistant County Administrator Mike Durette, Interim Central Services Director Dan McIntyre, County Attorney Don Cole, Property Acquisitions Manager ......, '.~ v 4~~ ¿v.v¿ rn~ ~V~~UO¡O¡U JIJ ANN eo .~~~u<.:un;s ilJ002 '-' ...." .. RN 110 Continu.tion S"eet State.ment of Sigailh:æu:e: Arc.hittctur al Narrative: This one·and·'·haJI·.tory 'tiOOd Frame Vemac:ular residential buUcJ1ng is located al 603 West Mid...ay Rod. Notabte architectural futur. mdude a ¡abl. roof wich preued metal suri'ate, a g!ble dormer, and an end porch contained under the main roof. Oad in piyboard, this house h~ IMtaJ sa...h windows &rid rats on concrete bl~ piers. AJtwadons to ûüt buitdilJ, indude the e~tosur. 01 the porch and replacl!mem of the windows. The bu.Udin¡ Is in ¡ood condition. Arr.hitecturaJ COD"': Franao Vemac::uJv, the prevaJent stile of residential arclútecture in Florida, refers to the tommon wood frame C~01'1 ted1nJque emplgye4 by lay or self-taught buÜdeR. Bdor. the Civil W$r, Icsìdent¡ rcUed upon tocal ma~ñaJ5 tnd tbeir own memodl tnd. dWIN to c:onstruct buitdinp. The Industrial RevcluåOI\ permitted ltandardlzadon of btdIdina materflls and perU and uerted a pervulvc influence over veroacular house desillL PopuIlI'....aaincs belped to make ardJitectural trends universal throu¡hout tht country The rai]r03d prcMded cheap lad .ffident traDsponadon tor manufactured bu11din¡ materials. Ultimat~ly. individual builders had ICCUI to , myriad 01 ftnlshed architectural products from ~ch to trute their 0¥-1I designs. Frame Vemac:uJv houses are typ!ca1Jy OQe or two stories in beight, with wood balloon frame structural system!t <»IU ~'TÌck pier foundations. 'Plans are us\lllty rec;tIn¡u1ar. thoulh L-shaped plans were often wed to maxiT du cros.-ve"tilation. aab!. or hip roofs usually have steep pitches M'aith ac:commodate actic space. Ho· ¡wnlal drop sidin& and weatherboard are the mast tommon exterior 1IftJI lurface m3teri:Ùs. Wood stùn~~e1 ""'~re often used to CO'Ier the roo&. but they bue·nearly always been replaced by composition shing1.. Porches, most c:ommonly simple entrance or end pord1ès, are cornmoa reatvres of the style. Fenestration is regular. but not aJ'W3)"5 symmetrical. Windows lie lenenlly dOuble-hq sash _th rnu1d-P1ne Ilazine and dðors eOntaì11 recessed ~ood panels. &teriur decoradOD is sparse 8nd Iimlled to onaamentaJ woodwork. Historical Nan'ltive: The R.omer Rasmussen House, Is located on a parcel in an urùncorporated area of St. Lucie CoWt'l¥. Local sourots indicate Mr. RamuaHD "IS a plumber and ¡he buUdin¡ .....as c:onsttucted in c. ] 394. The 'ront part of the buUdin¡ was moved from about a quarter of a nùle &'f4Y and buad on arlZhHf'cturaJ evidence and c:omparbon wills odter buildinp of similar sI%e and desi,." tJûs portion of the buildine. was constructed in c. 1910. (Intervfe'W""¡tb Alu kin, by WiIfiam Adams, 5/90) Jtistorical Context: Located ntar the Ø\id-&ray poUlt of florid.'s alSt CoIs.. SL Lucie County lies within 01'1' of the oldest continually settled re¡ioDS In tbe UDited States. Prehistoric Indians were dJ'8'loÌn to the area by the abundance of fisb Ind game In and along the scenle Indian River. Ew'opean contact with the areð occurr...d durina the Colonial period of Florida's hJslDry, but permanmt uttJement did not oc.eur W1tit the t 8c1Os, when ~Qrt Pierce \IIU Çonstnlcted ., . mWW'y outpOSt duMa the Sec:oad Seminole War. Deginnín. with dt. establbbmen& of Sf. Lude VUJace in 1142, a humber 01 sm all settlement$ developed aloag the west bank of the IndIan River durin¡ die Jate 19tb century. Construction of the f10rida E:ut COMt R3lIway in the 1890s ended the rel.tift isolation of the area. Whistle ¡tops were located at Arùcona, now Indrio, St. lude. Fort Pleree, White Ctty, ane! BdeD. the larc" settlement.! alOI'I' the Indian Riyer. Th~ railroad provided a direct UnIt '0 northern markets for fisbØ1c. .beef. d~ productS, and provided access co tt,e region for pr05pecüve sctdel'1. mtensive dt1in..c projectS undtT1aktn dwi.n¡ the 1910s and 1920s by the Fort Pierce F 8","~ lnvestmentCompanyredaimedVISI..asof'JlDchnd expanded lhec:ountÿs a¡rieWturaJ base. By 1920 St. Lucie COWlty had estabU,hcd itself at on. of' Florida" chief l.rieulCUraJ re¡ions while enterin¡ an e.xuberam period of historic development. The Great F1ori~ Land 800Qt btou¡ht thousands or tourlsu and ntw settJers te tht arCL Early subdivision activity wu çentered IIOW1d San tude Plaza and Retina Palms, The devdopment that the boom fostered wu spec:tacular, but short-Uved. The speculative bubble burst near the end of 1926, thro..in, the Florida eronomy ¡nto I dtpreasloo Ihree Y"" in advanœ of the rut of the "ation. Altho"3h development in St. Lucie CDUJ1ty wu slowed sI¡nIftcamIy, the Ilea fared better thm m~ny of its nei.hbors, because or Fort Pierçe harbor. the primary shIpplna point for citrus products for the central F1onda. The buildings surveyed in the unincorporated areis of Sto Lucie County accurately reflect its rich tdstorie.a1 and architectural p&.~t. , -, ~. ."', ....... -.....v...........,· "V .,\1'" "" A".)VI.11\ U:..) I41J un:; '-' w RECORD ØUHBBR: 110 'aq. 1 . X oriqinal upCSate B¡.TORXCAL .~OCTÐRI FORK r~RIDA HAsT.. liTE PILB Site 8 ~ SITE NAMa: Ro».~ Ra.musaen House HISTORIC COHTaXT8, Boo~ti.es NAT. "GI8TO CARCIO.f, Buildinq OTHER NAID. OR M8. ..0.. COUNTY: St. Lucie 0......%. Tf'l: Private, individual PJtOJBC'1' IlQas Survey of St. Luei. county: S+P DRR No. LOOATION, ADDRE'.. 603 W.st Midway ~oad CI'l'Yr VICI)fITY O.¡ao1ßlI 'lOt See att:eched maps 8UB, Parcel BLOCK LOT P~T OR cna.. DPt TO.01'& 35 S RUG.. 40 E .BC'1'10M: 3 1/4 f 1/....1/. t %JUtBOVUJI 'BC? 'I X 1& LUD GRI.NT: None UIGI 7.5 UP. ~nkona 1D.8 PR 1983 OTNI 10Q. ' BAa'1'XlfG. IfORTB¡NG: COORD!.".. 1 U"¡'I'GÞ.r þ IC . LOIlOI'l'UDBt D M S HISTORY ARCaZit_ct. BUILD.a: CO..".UC'rXOB Daft: c NoDI'XCA'1'%QR DATa(8); MOQ 1 DATBI OUClII1AL 01. (8). PUlln u.. (8)1 1'20 "'~RATIO. OAT.(S)I OR%O. LOCATION: Private Residence Private aesidence '.... DESORIÞTIOIf 8TYL.. Frame Vernacular PLANa BIT_axORc Rectangular PLUls %ft8UOR, Unknown NO. .'IOU." 1.!5 OtnIWXI.: 0 'ORCHIS! 1 STROOfUIaL "8TEI('). Wood, Balloon BJ'l'Q¡OI IUIICCI), Plywood J'OUIIDAt'IOJf. ~. Pier. D~r~L81 Concrete block I_ILL. POR~"., N/u"4er .ain rQof/enolosed ROOr.· ft... Gable SURraCI.G: Metal, pressed .ICOllDUy 8nOe8a Gable dormer C81J0r8YI 110.1 0 .,.atU'1 LØea'1'¡o... WINDOW.: Ketal s..b BI'1'IIJUoa OltlWØnl COWD%'1'IO.. Good SUaROVWDJ.G81 Re.idential 1lUD'1'rnI. See Continuation Sheet DORKlkS: 1 'Vv n.'II." .... ^""'I~V"''''^¿¡:'...';'................ p _..... .. _ w... ........ ..... _ ... p ~ . .. _ . _~:J..O~¡_ _ u ...... ..._5 _ _~~"V........... ..._........__.-... .......-.-......,..._-.................-...... ---............ -............... --- -......... w..... J8M 04 00 04:3Sp St. l "'i. CClU"t.~ Florida '-" 4821 r .1 'WI p.3 Page 2 PH" aI'TORlCAL STRUCTURE FORM Site 8 -_. /"-" ÄRCKAEOLOGICAL ..KaINe AT TaE I1T~ 'HIP ARCBAlOLOGICAL PORK COK'L8~BD? Y X n ARTIJ'ACT8 OR O'1'Ua Il'IUDUN'J No.... observed ~ECORÐla'8 IVALUATIoø OJ' IITI AREAS OF 8%GNI.ICA»CaC Architacture .~XØ%.LE ~O. MAT. A8GI'Taa7 y X n SYGNIP. .. »ART or DX8TaICT? Y x D SIO.IFICAHT AT LOC~L LlVEL7 X Y U SUKKARY O' 8IGRIF%OANCB See continuation .he.~ likely, need intQ li~e17, ne.d info likely, need ihfo inst into inst into ¡n9! into .. * . * ORa USE ONLy .. . . . .. .. · DHR USE ONLY .. * "" * . .. · DATE LISTBD ON NR .. · KEEPER DETERMINATION OF ELIQ.(DATE): YES _NO .. - · 5nPO EVALUATION OF EL!G~BILITY (DATE) t 'iES NO * - - · LOCAL DETERMINATION OF ELIG. (DATE): YES _NO * - - * OFPICI * · . * * * . DRR US! ONLY * ..., * . .... · DKR US£ ONLY * * * * . * RBCORDB. ¡~OaHATIO., ~I Robert Benn.t~ and Carol Henderson ÞATBa 06/15/90 AJrIL¡ATXOø. Hi8~oric PrQperty Associates, Inc ltBOTOCJQ,.. LOCa'1'IO. 01' DGa'ftVl'l. IiPA, PO Box 1002, at Augustine, FL 32085 nca'l'lVI ImMIla'l Roll 4, f'J:'ame I PHorOCRAPH MAP See At.tachaen1:s ,..- t. Lucie County Property Record rd Page 1 of3 St. Lucie County Property Appraiser Geographic Information Services Real Property Record for Parcel Number: Location: ()03MIDWAY RD Number: 1 of:2 368 Range: 40E Show Location Map Owner, Legal Descriptiol1, D~ed& Total Assessment ISubdiv Name: I Neighborhood: General Buildil1gJ)ata Imp. ICI"" I No.. Yea~ ~?IIt, T RSHD StOrIes: 194:, EU: ype: ~. 1.5 1940 . g Area: 2614 Under Roof: 2614 Wall: Building Perimeter SketCI1JlµdPhotograph '00 00 BAS 84 Improvements http://10.1.28.101lwebrnap/scripts/prc.pl?1 041581 0,340331200000004 1/18/00 02114/00 ST. M'CIE COUNTY - BOARD .."", PAGE 1 FZABt,1ARR ttARRANT UST #20- 05-FEB-2000 TO ll-FEB-2000 FUND SUMMARY FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 001 General Fund 471,023.50 0.00 001116 Sec 112/MPO/FBVAlPlànning 98/99 35.12 0.00 001125 TC Couununity Action Agency FY 99/00 506.20 0.00 001126 Section 112/HPo/FHYA Planning 99/00 2,669.66 0.00 001229 FBIP Boating Related Activities 69,652.24 0.00 001237 Transit Element for Long Range Plan 1,000.00 0.00 001245 TRIP Grant FY 99/00 17,579.52 0.00 001248 TDC Planning Grant FY 99/00 42.96 0.00 101 Transportation Trust Fund 75,994.22 0.00 101003 Transportatioh Trust/Local Option 5,077.50 0.00 102 Unincorporated Services Fund 32,491.98 0.00 102001 Drainage Maintenance MSTU 4,212.46 0.00 105 Library SpeciAl Grants Fund 4,818.30 0.00 107 Fine & Forfeiture Pund 367,866.30 0.00 111 River Park I Fund 5,017 .84 0.00 112 River Park II Fund 504.67 0.00 120 The Grove Fund 137.39 0.00 122 Indian River £states Fund 825.14 0.00 126 Southern Oak ~statês Lighting 107.98 0.00 139 Palm Grove Fund 644.24 0.00 140 Port & Airport Fund 6,440.62 0.00 160 Plan Maintenance RAn Fund 1,896.77 0.00 183 Ct Administrator-19th judicial Cir 3,314.75 0.00 183001 Ct Administrator-Atbitration/Mediat 1,365.51 0.00 183004 Ct Admin.- Teèn Court 1,308.05 0.00 183208 Court Reportet Grant-In-Aid 99/00 243.00 0.00 184202 Ft Pierce Inlêt Mgfut Implementation 12,044.38 0.00 184802 FIND-Spur Jetty 800.63 0.00 184803 FIND-Ft Piercê Inlèt Hydrodynamic 7,832.34 0.00 185203 FHFA-SHIP 98/99 3.22 0.00 185204 FHFA SHIP 99/00 866.87 0.00 186 Recycling Operating Fund 652.87 0.00 186202 DEP-Recycling & Education 98/99 120.55- 0.00 186203 Recycling & Education 99/00 513.46 0.00 310002 Impact Fees-PArks 51,160.68 0.00 310003 Impact Fees-PUblic Buildings 75,825.00 0.00 315 County Building Fund 1,481.52 0.00 316 County Capital 3,441.44 0.00 401 Sanitary Land~ill Fund 40,696.46 0.00 401219 FDEP Vaste Tire 99/00 1,009.50 0.00 418 Golf Course Fond 21,908.63 0.00 421 H.E.V. Utilitiès Fund 3,827.11 0.00 441 North HutchinSon Island Utilities 62,252.90 0.00 I 448 Renewal & Replacement Fund 528.84 0.00 451 S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund 38,447.13 0.00 461 Sports COmpleX Fund 20,054.43 0.00 471 Holiday Pines Utilities Fund 5,085.84 0.00 491 Building Code Fund 8,660.38 0.00 02/14/00 st. ~CIE COUNl'Y - BOARD fJARRANT UST 120- 05-FEB-2000 TO 11-FEB-2000 FuND SuMMARY ¡ PAGE ¡ î "wI1 FZABVARR \. FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 501 Information têchno1ogy Fund 249,540.16 0.00 505 Health Insuraftce Fund 45,538.17 7,644.67 505001 Property/Casuå1ty Insurance Fund 9,478.85 0.00 510 Service GaragE! Fund 13,547.95 0.00 611 Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund 2,583.31 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 1,752,437.44 7,644.67 .\. ,"" ~ 'j - I i t , I ! , \. ·i - 02114/00 st. tw!E COUNTY - BOARD ....., PAGE 1 FZABYARR VOiD LISTI 20- 05-FEB-2000 TO ll-FEB-2000 FUND: 001 - Generai Fund CHECK INVOICE VÉNDoR TOTAL 00252445 12006400 F1a Ditectors~ Seminar 100.00 00253929 12009692 Fla Records Management Associa 35.00 FUND TOTAL t 135.00 '- '-' AGENDA REQUEST ITEM~O. ß-'~~ DATE: February 15, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Second Amendment to Contract with Avatar Utility Services, Inc. BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the attached Second Amendment and authorize the Chairman to sign the Amendment. [X] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: ~ Review and Aoorovals Management & BUdgeW-eft- )~, Utility Bvcs. Dir. l)' - Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eft. 5/96 , '-' "WI INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 00-158 DATE: February 1, 2000 SUBJECT: Second Amendment to Agreement with Avatar Utility Services, Inc. -------------------------------------------------------- -------------------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: On December 23, 1998, the County entered into an Agreement with Avatar Utility Services, Inc. to operate, maintain and manage the County's Wastewater Treatment, Reclaimed Water & Potable Water Systems and a permitted non-community drinking water system at the County's Agricultural Extension Office. On May 18, 1999, the parties entered into a First Amendment to include the operation, maintenance and management of the Holiday Pines Facility. The Contractor has notified the County that it has merged with Severn Trent Environmental Services, Inc. to form Severn Trent-Avatar Utility Services, LLC which desires to assume the Original Agreement as amended. RECOMMENDATION ¡CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Second Amendment and authorize the Chairman to sign the Second Amendment. Respectfully submitted, l /. (/) I ",fJ(j~ / Daniel S. McIntyr County Attorney!-// DSM/ caf --- '-" ..., ~~ SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR OPERATION, MAINTENANCE, AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY WATER, WASTEWATER, AND RECLAIMED WATER FACILITIES THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made this day of , 2000, by and between St. Lucie County, Florida, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (the "County") and Avatar Utility Services, Inc. ("Contractor"). WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, on December 23, 1998, the parties entered into an Agreement for Operation, Maintenance and Management for St. Lucie Water, Wastewater, and Reclaimed Water Facilities (the "Utility Management Agreement") whereby the Contractor agreed to operate, maintain and manage the County's Wastewater Treatment, Reclaimed Water & Potable Water Systems and a permitted non-community drinking water system at the County's Agricultural Extension Office, as described on Exhibit "A" to the Agreement (the "Facilities"); and, WHEREAS, on May 18, 1999, the parties entered into a First Amendment wherein the parties agreed that the Contractor shall also operate, maintain and manage the Holiday Pines Facility for an additional fee under the terms of the Utility Management Agreement effective upon the acquisition of the Holiday Pines Facility by the County; and, WHEREAS, on December 7, 1999, the Contractor notified the County that the Contractor merged with Severn Trent Environmental Services, Inc. to form Severn Trent- Avatar Utility Services, LLC, which desires to assume the December 23, 1998 Agreement as amended. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and covenants contained herein, and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties hereto agree to amend the Utility Management Agreement as follows: 1. As a result of the merger referenced above, the Contractor identified in the December 23, 1998 Agreement and the May 18, 1999 First Amendment is hereby designated as Severn Trent-Avatar Utility Services, LLC. 2. Except as expressly amended herein, all of the remaining terms and conditions of the Utility Management Agreement as previously amended shall remain in full force and effect. g: \atty\ag reemnt\docs\severn trent-avata r- 2A -1- .' '-' ~ :~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed as of the date and year first above written. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Chairman Deputy Clerk ATTEST: ND BY: ~~ê~~~ ec¡::eta County Attar S~~~ .1~JI~-A SERVJ.Vr~q BY: g: \atty\ag reemnt\docs\severn trent-avatar-2A -2- A. ~AGENDA REOUEST ITEM ~ C-2B DATE: February 15,2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] TO: Board of County Commissioners PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT):County Attorney Heather Young Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: St. Lucie County Sports Complex Security - Third Amendment to Interlocal Agreement with City of Port St. Lucie for Traffic Control and Security BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum CA 00-195 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Account Nos. 461-7521-531000-700, 461-7522-531000-700, and 461-7520-531000-700 PREVIOUS BOARD ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed Third Amendment to the lnterlocal Agreement with the City of Port St. Lucie for traffic control and security at the St. Lucie County Sports Complex and authorize the chairman to sign the amendment. [X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: COMMISSION ACTION: Purchasing: County Attomey:~ Originating Dept. Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable): _ .. '-" ..",,; INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUl\1 ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 00-195 DATE: February 7, 2000 SUBJECT: St. Lucie County Sports Complex Security - Third Amendment to Interlocal Agreement with City of Port St. Lucie for Traffic Control and Security BACKGROUND: On June 21, 1988, the County entered into an Interlocal Agreement with the City of Port St. Lucie for off-duty police officers to provide traffic control security during scheduled events at the St. Lucie County Sports Complex. The initial agreement provided for an hourly rate of twenty-one and 36/100 dollars ($21.36) per police officer. The agreement was amended on June 20, 1989 to increase the rate to twenty-three and 50/100 dollars ($23.50). On May 19, 1998, the agreement was amended to reduce the rate to eighteen and 00/100 dollars ($18.00) per hour for police officers and nineteen and 00/100 dollars ($19.00) per hour for supervisors, plus a five percent (5 %) administrative fee. The Police Department recently notified the County that the hourly rate had been increased to twenty and 00/100 dollars ($20.00) per hour for police officers and twenty-one and 00/100 dollars ($21.00) per hour for supervisors effective January 1, 2000. . The five percent (5 %) administrative fee remains in effect resulting in an hourly rate of twenty-one and 00/100 dollars for a police officer and twenty-two and 05/100 dollars ($22.05) for a supervisor. Attached to ills memorandum is a proposed Third Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement which incorporates these increases. CONCLUSION/RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed Third Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement with the City of Port St. Lucie for traffic control and security at the St. Lucie County Sports Complex and authorize the chairman to sign the amendment. Respectfully submitted, ~ ð-::r Heather Young Assistant County Attorney HY/ Copies to: '-" ..., County Administrator Leisure Services Director Finance Director Management and Budget Manager Contracts Coordinator Deputy Clerk '-" ...." THIRD AMENDMENT TO INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT (TRAFFIC CONTROL AND SECURITY - ST. LUCIE COUNTY SPORTS COMPLEX) THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO INTERLOCALAGREEMENT by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "County", and the CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE, a Florida municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to as "City". WIT N ESSE T H: WHEREAS, on June 21, 1988, the parties entered into an lnterlocal Agreement, hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement", which was recorded in Official Records Book 593, pages 1800 through 1802, of the public records of St. Lucie County, Florida, which provided for the City to furnish off-duty City police officers to the County to perform traffic control and security during scheduled events at the St. Lucie County Sports Complex. WHEREAS, the parties subsequently amended the Agreement on June 20, 1989 and May 19, 1998 to reflect increases in the hourly wages paid to the City's police officers and supervisor, which amendments were recorded in Official Records Book 644 at page 321 and Official Records Book 1155 at page 2201 of the public records ofSt. Lucie County, Florida, respectively; and, WHEREAS, the City increased the hourly wage paid to its police officers and supervisor effective January 1, 2000; and, WHEREAS, the parties desire to further amend the Agreement to reflect the planned increase in the hourly wage for the City's police officers and supervisors. g:\agreemnt\interloc\3 a-psi-sec. wpd - '-'" ..., NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and undertakings contained herein, the parties hereto agree to amend the Agreement as follows: 1. Paragraph 3 shall be amended to read as follows: 3. In return for the faithful performance of the services provided in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement, the County agrees to pay to the City twenty and 00/1 00 ($21.00) dollars for each hour of service provided to the County by a police officer and twenty-two and 05/1 00 ($22.05) dollars for each hour of service provided to the County by a police supervisor. The rates set forth herein include a five percent (5%) administrative fee. 2. All other terms and conditions hereunder shall remain in full force and effect. This Agreement shall be filed with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida, prior to its effectiveness. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Third Amendment on the dates below written. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: BY: Chairman Deputy Clerk DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney g:\agreemnt\interioc\3 a-psi-sec. wpd 2 ATTEST: ......" Deputy Clerk g:\agreemnt\interloc\3 a-psl-sec. wpd - .." CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA BY: Mayor DATE: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: City Attorney .., .J ~an-12-00 09:61 Port S~. Lucie Police 561 785 6584 P.Ol ..... .."", CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE /i~f~~·~ rf~1) <',.,....- -..,// "~~.9ftlp-~/ POLICE DEPARTMENT }:hn M. :il;inncr Cf".r ,'I p'!h¡'c 121 .s.W. PmrSr. Luçie-Blvu.· P(\õ·rSi. Lu:i¿"Florid.l::J..PS4 rSMI) f:li ·50tX, '<40201.1 ¡["AXI January í 2, 2000 Mr. Michael Leeds Le!sure Services Director 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierçe Florica 34950 Dear Mr. Leeds .=>rease tIe informed that the hourly rate for Off-Duty Ceta:ls provided by the Port St. :"'ucie Po'ice Department has increased. effective January 1, 2000. The new rates are as fol!ows~ Sl.:pe:-visor fees, 521.00 + 5% Administrative Fee = $2205 Officer fees, S20.00 + 5%1 Adm¡~jstrat¡ve Fee = 52100 If you have any questions in this regard, p!ease do not hesi~a!e to contact me at 344·4135. Si1cerely, /,::./,,:.~.... J / /..{~I.:_L / Sgt. Ed!ìlo~d J. Ke!:eher Soecia! Detail Sect'on E J Klfi cc: LoÎs (Mets Stadium COard!nator) ~ IW~ .~ \:. 1.1~;.'. \':',,",H;I;~ :U:';I :-]l:~C I....,: ; IIf,·...···..·.·", .4J.:1....~.:' An F:lual Oppnrrunity F.mploYl'r ~ AGENDA REQUEST JøÙ8 I} . ITrM: NO. C :;¡e ,- DATE:February 15, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Donald G Cole Property Acquisition Manager SUBJECT: Environmentally Significant Land Program lndrio North Savannas Project FCT#95-052-P56 Schroepfer - Parcel 198 BACKGROUND: Please see attached background memorandum. FUNDS AVAILABI,E: Funds will be made available in account #382-3915-561000-310035 PREVIOUS ACTION: August 1, 1995 - Received Board of County Commission authorization to submit Grant Application to Florida Communities Trust (FCT) for the purchase ofIndrio North Savannas Project. March 26, 1996 - Received Board of County Commission approval of the Conceptual Approval Agreement with Florida Communities Trust to purchase the lndrio North Savannas Project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Option Agreement for Parcel 198 highlighted in purple on the attached map, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct staff to close the transaction and record the document in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. COMMISSION ACTION: f] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: u s M. Anderson County Administrator [X] County Attorney: ··r,,).~ 10J\',,- [X] Originating Dep~~ _. [X] Management & ~et/: [X1T,,,,iRure SVR /hL- (I tJ v [] Purchasing:_ [X]COmm.DeveloP:~ Effective 5/96 [X] Finance: (check for copy only, if applicable) r ,'j' ~ '-" ..., " PROPERTY ACQUISITION DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners Donald G. Cole, Property Acquisition Manager February 15,2000 Environmentally Significant Land Program Indrio North Savannas Project FCT#95-052-P56 Schroepfer - Parcel 198 BACKGROUND: On March 26, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Conceptual Approval agreement with Florida Communities Trust (PCT) for the purchase of 228 properties witliin the Indrio North Savanna Project. The Board authorized the use of $600,000 of the County Environmentally Significant Land (ESL) funds to match a 50% grant from FCT. On the attached map of the project, the parcel that is the subject of this re~uest is highlighted in purple. This parcel was negotiated at the Maximum Approved Value. The Option Agreement for the subject parcel is available for your review in the Property Acquisitions Office. RECOMMENDA TION 1 CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Option Agreement for Parcel 198 highlighted in purple on the attached map, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct staff to close the transaction and record the document in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Respectfully submitted: ~·~¿/~k ··onald . 0 e Property Acquisition Manager CC: County Administrator County Attorney Community Development Director Leisure Services Director Finance Director Management & Budget Manager North Closed Transaction - County Owned - Closing Pending Option Agreement Ths·À' '-' ..., ITEM NO. C~ , AGENDA REQUEST DATE: Fp.hrll~ry 1 Ii r 7000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING ] CONSENT [XX ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Susan B. Kilmer SUBMITTED BY ( DEPT): . Library SUBJECT: St. Lucie West Library - Contracted Services BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County Library has been a partner with Indian River Community College and Florida Atlantic University to provide Branch Library services in the St. Lucie West community since 1995. The funds for this project have come strictly from the Library's State Aid budget - no general funds are used for the endeavor. FUNDS AVAIL. 105-7115-534000-7950 Contracted Services PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board of County Commissioners entered into an agreement with Indian River Community College to provide library service in St. Lucie West. These services had been ongoing sine 1995. Contract #C95-08-592 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of expenditure of $82,400 for contracted services through Indian River Community College for St. Lucie West Library. [ X ] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: [ DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: X}éounty A~torney: X}Crigina~ing Dept. ct :r &;¿ ~gt. , Budget: Purchasing: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for copy only, if applicable) -----. ~ ~ ..." MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY LIBRARY TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Susan Kilmer, Library Director DATE: February 2, 2000 SUBJECT: St. Lucie West Library ****************************************************************************** The Board of County Commissioners entered into an interlocal agreement with Indian River Community College in 1995 to provide Library services in a branch capacity at the St. Lucie West Campus. The St. Lucie West Library is a three way usage facility with students from Indian River Community College and Florida Atlantic University using the library as well as the general public having access to all of the technology and collections. The Library Department, through their State Aid budget, provide funding for two full-time staff and operational funds directly to Indian River Community College ($82,400), as well as funding for books, subscriptions and communication costs which are paid directly to the vendors through the library's State Aid budget ($30,958). The St. Lucie West Library has provided advanced technology to the citizens ofSt. Lucie County which has not been available through the public libraries. This site provides training courses on a wide variety of electronic media and the ability to interact online with teleconferences. This joint usage facility has been a win-win endeavor and the residents of St. Lucie County have gained from having this facility and its collection available for general use. Indian River Community College and Florida Atlantic University are proceeding with a 2 + 2 campus and will be expanding the library within the next two - five years. ~ ðlÓftU~ / ' Susan B. Kilmer ,. '-' ...", AGREEMENT between INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE and ST. LUCIE COUNTY relating to THE PROVISION OF UBRARY SERVICES AT ST. LUCIE WEST This Interlocal Agreement is made by and between the DISTRICT BOARD OF .~ TRUSTEES of INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE, (hereinafter referred to as "Trustees") and ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (hereinafter referred to as "County") to provide a joint use library. . ~_ WHEREAS, Trustees own real property including a 10,000 square foot library building at the St. Lucie West Campus; and, WHEREAS, it is Trustee's desire to provide full library facilities for its students and faculty at the St. Lucie West Campus; and, WHEREAS, it is County's desire to provide branch library services in the St. Lucie West area as part of the St. Lucie County Public Library System; and, WHEREAS, the parties hereto have determined that it would be to the mutual advantage of each and in the best interest of both the citizens of St. Lucie County and '-4. the faculty, staff, and students of Indian River Community College to provide for the joint ~ use of library facilities. 1 , ~ ...., ~ NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual advantages accruing to the parties and the benefits, promises, and considerations hereinafter set out, Trustees and County agree as follows: I. PURPOSE AND INTENT Trustees and County wish to maximize the use of their respective resources and to provide state-of the-art information services for the students and faculty of Indian -- River Community College and the residents of St. Lucie County. It is further the intent of the parties: A. To provide high quality library services to the public at large and to the faculty and students of the College. B. To maximize the use of funds and facilities for libraries and avoid unnecessary duplication of facilities and services. C. To jointly provide programs and facilities that are better than either entity could provide on its own. D. To further the relationship between College and the community. E. To provide students and faculty of the College with access to the larger holdings of the Library. F. To provide the citizens of St. Lucie County with access to the electronic resources of the College. II. ROLE OF THE PARTIES '" In consideration of mutual covenants and promises herein contained, Trustees and County agree as follows: 2 . '-' ...., A. County agrees to provide funds to Trustees in the amount of $118,939 for the purchase of equipment, shelving, books, subscriptions, audiovisual resources, supplies, utilities, and support one full-time staff position including benefits. The 1994-1995 budget to accomplish these ends is attached and hereto referred to as Exhibit A. For fiscal year 1995-96, County agrees to provide funds to Trustees in the amount of $50,OOOforlhe purchase of books, subscriptions, audiovisual resources, supplies, utilities, and additional funding to support one full-time staff position including benefits. B. For future fiscal years, the parties agree to meet on or before February 1 of each fiscal year· beginning February 1, 1996 to confer and develop a proposed operating budget. Trustees agree to provide County within ninety (90) days following the end of each fiscal year evidence of expended funds provided and receipts -. ._.._--~ - supporting those expenditures. C. County agrees that the responsibility for the administration of the ~-_...- shared resources center rests with the College's Learning Resources Director. D. County and Trustees agree that a joint liaison committee wili be established consisting of repressntatives of the two institutions to examine the shared resources operation and advise the Director on budget, acquisitions, and other aspects of the joint use library operation. E. Trustees agree that equipment and maintenance thereof will be the "'4. responsibility of the Trustees except that County will be responsible for the SIRSI on-line catalog terminals and peripherals. 3 . '--. .. ~ ...., F. Trustees agree to inventory and advise County of any and all library materials, equipment and furnishing purchased with County funds. Trustees agree that County will control the selection and purchase of books and materials by County for the library. G. Trustees will house within existing library facility mutually agreed <u upon collections or newly purchased library materials that County deems necessary to support the residents of County. H. Trustees and County agree to provide reciprocal borrowing for residents of St. Lucie County and the faculty and students of the College. I. Trustees agree to circulate County's library materials on County's circulation system. J. Trustees agree to provide County access to the College's electronic resources. K. Trustees and County will mutually agree upon a wiring infrastructure that will accommodate the library automation systems in use at the St. Lucie West library facility. L. Trustees agree to be responsible for damages to County's designated equipment and to give proper notification to County when equipment needs normal maintenance or basic service occurring during the periods County's designated equipment is used by Trustees. .~ 4 . --- .- '-' w M. \M1en fully operational, Trustees agree to open the library for public use during the following minimum hours: Monday through Friday 9:00 a.m. - 5:00 p.m.; two nights each week until 8:00 p.m. and frol}! 9:00 a.m. - 12:00 p.m. on each Saturday. N. In the event of discontinuance of funding by the Florida Legislature in subsequent years, or the termination of this contract, the SIRSI library system and rental book collection shall revert to County. All other items shall become the property of Trustees. O. County agrees that Florida Atlantic University will participate in the shared resources center. All parties participating agree to the conditions necessary to maximize access to the information resources provided by each institution. III. TERM; TERMINATION This Agreement shall be effective for a period of twenty (20) years beginning July 1, 1995; provided, however, that either party may elect to terminate the agreement with or without cause on 120 days written notice of said termination. Funds involved in said agreement shall be prorated through the date of termination. IV. AMENDMENT This agreement may be amended by written agreement of the parties. V. NOTICES All notices, requests, consents, and other communications required or permitted under this Agreement shall be in writing (including telex and telegraphic .~ communication) and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered 5 . -. '-' ...., by messenger or courier service, telecommunicated, or mailed (airmail if international) by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid), return receipt requested, and addressed to: As to St. Lucie County: With a copy to: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Annex Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 As to Trustees With a copy to: President Indian River Community College 3209 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5596 IRCC Board of Trustees Attorney 311 South Second Street Fort Pierce, Florida 34950 or tå such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this Section. Each such notice shall be deemed delivered: (a) on the date delivered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date telecommunicated if by telegraph, (c) on the date - - of transmission with confirmed answer back if by telex, and (d) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. VI. AUDIT The parties agrees that either party or any of its duly authorized representatives shall, until the expiration of five (5) years after expenditure of funds under this Agreement, have access to and the right to examine any directly pertinent books, documents, papers, and records of the other party involving transactions related to this .~ Agreement. 6 . '-' ...., VII. PUBUC RECORDS The parties shall allow public access to all documents, papers, letters, or other materials subject to the provisions of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes, and made or received by either party in conjunction with this Agreement. VIII. ASSIGNMENT No party shall assign this Agreement to any other persons or firm without first obtaining the non assigning parties' approval. IX. WHOLE UNDERSTANDING This Agreement embodies the whole understanding of the parties. There are no promises, terms, conditions, or obligations other than those contained herein, and this Agreement shall supersede all previous communications, representations, or agreements, either verbal or written, between the parties hereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused the execution by their duly authorized officials as of the date aforesaid. ATTEST: !5" V' ". ..,~ DEPU .f '~R~'.(~,. "" . (\1. .....:":..,...... r~ 't.. :~> f "... c;.,_.". '.' ..... <Jr..,:$!~,., : '" ," !-~: ~ , '\".::,. ) ~;. ..... l \c. . '\ \"J , .f'::::¡:· ,='., , , :,~ \.~ h ,7, , ~; i i...~· _.."./. ~ \ :..¡ ..4'1 J ¡.-' 1 ';., t.. : Cf) ~ ~ t~!~~\ _'. / ).: \,::~~.:L/jj¡¡l ,~/' ·,.I-'-'~' 00_ ~"..~";.. "'~.'.' (:,.,-...... .:.:'.... \'_. !,~~1 . . <: ;,'~ ;.: ,: ~ :~.,,~:;;.}' . ,.;..,_....'-.~.... BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS BY: -~ BY: 7 . ---- - -- '-' ATTEST: ~~ I ~ ..~ ...., BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE BY: ~"':~~SSEY PRESIDENT APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS BY: - ~~?:I? A TIO y' 8 . ........- -- """ '-' AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-4 DATE: Feb. 15,2000 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: OMB PRESENTED BY: Harvey M. Lincoln SUBJECT: Request authorization for update of (2) computer monitors for South County Judicial office computers. BACKGROUND: Court Administration requested (4) computer systems for the South County Annex which was approved on 11/23/99 Agenda # C-5-B. The systems came with (4) 15" monitors, and two of the systems have now been updated with (2) 17" monitors. This change has caused a $150.00 difference in the above systems. Court Administration has the funds for this increase in their current budget, so this update will not increase their FY1999-2000 budget. FUNDS WILL BE AVAILABLE: 183001-752-564000-6000 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Budget Amendment # BAOO-114 and Equipment Request # EQOO-201. ~ 1 APPROVED [1 DENIED [ 1 OTHER: COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: XX ,x Coordi nation/Siq natu res Management & Budget: ;¡w ~ 'f Purchasing: XX Public Works: Other: £ Originating Dept: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX J . BUD~T AMENDMENT REQUEST FOR~ . . REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: PREPARED DATE: AGENDA DATE: OMS/COURT ADMINISTRATION 02/07/00 02/15/00 I Ž _ {,;)£>f],21:a~J ¡.:mLGL~ í~ii:£Z{~Lrom;,~ ' ~'(ú@J,,~i~ if' ¡ , ~ TO: 183001-752-564000-6000 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $150 FROM: 183001-752-541300-6000 POSTAGE $150 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: UPDATE OF (2) COMPUTER MONITORS FOR SO. COUNTY JUDICIAL OFFICES. CONTINGENCY BALANCE: N/A THIS AMENDMENT: N/A REMAINING BALANCE: N/A DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: ~ BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 00-114 DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: G:\BUDGET\QUA TTRO\GENERAL\FORMS\AMENDMOO.wb302l07/00 en 0::: wo Zo 00 _N encn enm -mO :E-o :Eo:::iõ 0«- (JwÑ »0 I--J z«" :J(Jw o en I- t'\ - « ...,u..c u..0:::1- Ooen Cu..w O:::I-:J «enO OwW m:JO::: >0« I-WC Zo:::Z :JI-W OZC> (Jw« W:E _0.. (J- :J:J -JO .w I- en CI) ~ c w c z w :e :e o o W B: c w > o B: Il. Il. c( >< CD c:: c:: q: .ò c:: :::J o ü :S :::J o C/) CD :S ...... CtI :t::: CtI ...... CI) - CI) CtI 'õ ~ :::J '-., CD :S ~..... .E á5 CI) E ~ .9- ...... :::J ~o- CI) CD ~ 0> CD .S '5 3: 0..0 E:::::: 0.E (,) CD ~:S -CD ~ :> :::J CtI .E~ o>:=:: .S § ...... CI) CI) ~ ~ 0-...... ~ ~ CI) CI) '- ~ c::.æ .Q :::J ...... 0.. .ê E CI) 0 'ë: (,) '- - E~ '0 ~ q: :::J 't::.E :::J CD 8~ < o ¡:: ~ CI) ~ ~ a « -J .... ~ gs ü o § ü '"") ~ z w :e z ~ 0 c( ëñ aï :; c Õ o o o co C o o "t- co 10 I C\ 10 r-. I .... o o C") co .... Q: w m :e :J z .... Z :J o U u c( ~ - cC\ì .- co ~ .æ.æ 'S .S: ~ _ __ -C/)a.. - _ ';t C\ì (\I~ ';t - - ';t ...... ~~~----~~-(,)\;:; - 1:) CDO c a - - \;;,~ "f:c c a 10 "- ,,, CtI < '" CD ,..... ';tca:r: .,....,...~ooò).g.~ ~~.QÜ_~~ :::J~a::~ \;;,(\1 < ^,..... v v 0 CD a :s: ~ a.. q: c.; ~' ~ :::> :::> ~ ~ Ü ::::. :s. :r: .... o C\ C o C l1J :it a w B: .... Z W :e Il. :J a w '-' ..." Board of County Commissioners Meeting February 15, 2000 UNAGENDAED ITEMS U.l SFWMD Everglades Restudy Restoration Project Commissioner Hutchinson asked the board to approve that the Chairman send a letter addressing objections for assisting in the funding of this project. Commissioner Hutchinson will attend a conference call on Friday, February 18, 2000 to express her views. Dan McIntyre will draft a letter after the conference call and bring this before the board. Commission Action: [ X ] Approved [ ] Denied [ ] Other ,~. o~as~.~derson County Administrator U.2 Legislative Project Priority List Commissioner Hutchinson requested that the Legislative Project List submitted in July 1999 be re-prioritized. Commissioner Hutchinson requested that this item be placed on the February 22, 2000 agenda. In addition, Commissioner Hutchinson requests that each Commissioner volunteer to head up a particular project on the list and follow it through to completion. Commission Action: [ X ] Approved [ ] Denied [ ] Other D ugl ~. ~derson County Administrator