Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 07-18-00 ~ 'wi JULY 18,2000 6:00 PM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT-Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. ..¡ ~ ...., ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 www.stlucieco.gov AGENDA July 18, 2000 6:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held July 11, 2000. ftJpro{«ß. 2. PROCLAMATION/PRESENTATION Resolution No. 00-161- Consider approval of the resolution commending the Amateur Athletic Union/y outh Basketball of America (MU /YBOA) Basketball T earn of the Treasure Coast Basketball Club for their achievement in competing and winning five of the six tournaments entered, which included the State Championship for their age division of seventeen and under/juniors; and further, wishing them good luck as they compete in the National Championship Tournament to be held at Disney Wide J¥j>rld of ¡5ports on July 2.4, 2000, through July 30, 2000. fffpro'lut-, 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA ftpprðV'¿ PUBLIC HEARINGS COUNTY ATTORNEY SA. Ordinance No. 00-22 / 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application/Bee Electronics, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the ordinance as drafted, establishing an exemption from certain ad valorem taxation. /tppror-eJ ¡.f.-I (êo¡JúmJ NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to app.eal any action taken by the Board at tnese meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may neeä to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the reç¡uest of any party to the proceedings. Individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any indivlaual testitying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability. reHuiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462:'777 orTDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. .", '-' ...." REGULAR AGENDA JULY 18,2000 PAGE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED) COUNTY ATTORNEY (CONTINUED) SB. Ordinance No. 00-23 / 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application / Centaur Manufacturing - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the ordinance as drafted, establishing an exemption from certain ad valorem taxation. TrpfJ((J led sc. Ordinance No. 00-26 / 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application / Bluewater Sport Fishing Boats, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the ordinance ·as dr afte~~7stablishing an exemption from certain ad valorem taxation. tp¡JiJ¡/ee{ SD. Ordinance No. 00-27 / 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application / QVC St. Lucie, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the ordinance as drafted, establishing an exemption from certain ad valorem taxation. ft¡;pI?J¡/I¿J... SE. Ordinance No. 00-28 / 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application / Orchid Island Juice Company - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the ordinance as drafted, establishing an exemption from certain ad valorem taxation. !I¡¡;r¿;¡J.a::!, PUBLIC WORKS SF. Resolution No. 00-08S - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution providing for the creation and establishment of a Special Street Lighting Improvement District in Pine Hollow Subdivision and authorize the Chairman and County Attorney to execut~he re~qlu¡ion. ¡rt6fdn - ;lufc11tfl<ððYU I I¡JPrN'«1lf--Q SG. Resolution No. 00-lS4 - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution creating the Academy Drive M.S.B.U; authorizing the County Engineer to proceed with the engineering and design of the proj ect Pursuant to the procedures set forth in Chapter 1-13.S; St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances, authorizing the County Engineer to advertise for bids for construction; and to prepare an interlocal agreement with the City of Fort Pierce and the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority. /lt1.J~ '-' ...", REGULAR AGENDA JULY 18,2000 PAGE THREE PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT SH. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 1(.' ~ ~ Ô,4-·o 0'" Q¡v'\èfi" -ØflSJ Tourism / Agreement Extension - Consider staff recommendation to approve the one (1) year extension to the agreement with R. ]. Gibson, Inc., for advertising services in an arnount not to exceed $2 SO,OOO, and authorize Vì the Chairman to sign the agreement upon recei¡!l ofA~e signed original ~ I.A from R. J. Gibson. RtCð~{\J io 0 ttf;{OR£tV5~rmnJA:J4 ~Kf1 (1' \\) p(ðv'~ ~ 6'-0 '7 ~ ~ Resolution No. 00-120/ Freedom PIa tics - Consider staff recommendation 5lt to approve the resolution granting a Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan ~:ç ~ ~ Approval for the proj ect known as Freedom Plastics. Location: East and ~ ~ ~ G£!'~I .~~ West side of Enterprise Road. !1ppròve..-4. :J'" () 'f" ~ \~~_ C. Resolution No. 00-119/ Dollom, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to ~ .:yf- n S ,_ L approve the resolution granting Major Site Plan approval, subject to the/ ~ ~~\¡ dCJ'~ eleven listed special conditions, for the project to be known as savann. a _ ÇyíY U·, ,\ 0'\7 Club Apartments. Location: North and South sides of Savanna Club ~,~ ~ ~ CP~~ BO~;fu ¡¡ppro:nnately 800 feet East So th p, þ¿ +0 11 CU1 ~ ~ ~ ~~ /)~) f~¡\ WÕld! £Vlt'fJ O~# f ' 'f).<2~~. '\ ~.,fJflI¡X(@d ~ '0~Oo(' ~~\~ \J/ \V"'-V 9"-' ( OLS~c'Y\ ZM+~ SI. S]. 6. B. Resolution No. 00-117 / Jarnes and Shirley Cagle / Quasi- Judicial- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting Preliminary and Final Planned Development Site Plan approval and a change in zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single-Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the PNRD (planned Non-Residential Development - Cagle's Cove) Zoning District for the project to be known as Cagle's Cove - PNRD. Location: S61S Oleander Avenue, west side of Oleander Aven}le, approximately 3S0 feet south of Gopher Ridge Road. ~LM.~ ltol!(JlJh&n-'y5-{) Resolution No. 00-122 / Roger Medema / Quasi-Judicial - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting an extension of the Planned Development Site Plan approval and a change in zoning from the PUD (planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) Zoning District to the PUD (planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club - MHP) Zoning District. Location: North side of Orange Avenue, a roxi ately 1,800 feet ea~tof th~ Florida Turnpike. ~ d - - {p¡/Jv.r/v,uf ('~Yl ~U¡e( ~£~ tvrtWiJ / ¿}r !Ilf/7íC¿<M /øuJJJ Resolution No. 00-118 / Bruce Neäf / ~ uasi- u icial - Consider staff1oþß; recommendation to approve the resolution granting a change in zoning ~~ ~ from the IX (Industrial, Extraction) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, éJfÌh'X Light) Zoning District. Location: South side of St. Lucie Boulevard, ./'Cj a roximatel O. S mile west of Sa Road. 6í (9() 7¿ \ I ~ C ~:s '-' .."" CONSENT AGENDA Julv 18. 2000 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 41 2. PUBLIC WORKS A. Change Order No. 1- Consider staffrecommendation to accept and approve the final change order, decreasing the contract amount by $124,672.29 to a final contract amount of $6S4,973.88, authorize the Chairman to sign the change order, release retainage, and make final payment in the amount of $6S,497.39 for the 1998-99 Annual Resurfacing Contract with Ranger Construction Industries, Inc. B. Temporary Non-Exclusive Drainage Easement with St. Lucie West - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Temporary Non-Exclusive Drainage Easement and authorize the Chairman to sign the easement. 3. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Deputy Sheriff's Blanket Bond - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chairman to execute the bond. B. Partial Release of Lien - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chairman to sign the Partial Release of lien for St. Lucie County Code Enforcement Board Order Imposing Fine/Lien dated October 6, 1999 and recorded in Official Record Book 1261, Page 1793, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. C. Indrio North Savannas / Parcel 70 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Option Agreement for Parcel 70, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct staff to close the transaction and record the document in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. D. Plat Approval/South County Regional Stadium - Consider staff recommendation to approve Plat No. 127 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Plat. 4. VETERANS SERVICES Budget Amendment No. 00-146 and Equipment Request No. 00-230/ Transfer of Funds - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget amendment and equipment request in the amount of $980 to cover the required cost share for installation of Y2K upgrades at the South County Courthouse Annex Building. '-" ..."., CONSENT AGENDA JULY 18,2000 PAGE TWO S. ADMINISTRATION A. Restudy Coordination Committee - Consider staff recommendation that the Board ratify Commissioner Coward's appointment of Debbie Crouse to serve on the Restudy Coordination Committee. B. Contractor's Certification Board - Consider staff recommendation that the Board ratify Commissioner Lewis' re-appointment of Craig Dunkelberger to serve on the Contractor's Certification Board. 6. LEISURE SERVICES Permission to Bid - Consider staff recommendation to approve the request for bids for construction of boardwalks at the Children's Environmental Learning Museum. 7. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Tourism / R.J. Gibson Invoices - Consider Tourist Development and staff recommendation to approve payment of the April invoices to R. J. Gibson in the amount of $26,641.13. B. Tourism / R.J. Gibson Invoices - Consider Tourist Development and staff recommendation to approve payment of the May invoices to R. J. Gibson in the amount of $6,479.20. C. Permission to Advertise / South A-1-A Multi-Use Path - Consider staff recommendation to grant the request for permission to advertise for bids and to authorize the Management and Budget Department to transfer the appropriate funds from Road Impact Fee Zone S into the project reserve accounts for this construction project. The estimated construction budget for this first phase is just under $ 700,000. \r' ., ~. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: July 11, 2000 Tape: 1 Convened: 9:05 a.m. Adjourned: 10:25 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chainnan, John D. Bruhn, Frannie Hutchinson, Cliff Barnes, Doug Coward, Paula Lewis Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Robert Bradshaw, Asst. County Administrator; Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director, Paul Phillips, Airport Director, Mike Leeds, Leisure Services Director, Ray Wazny, Public Works Director, Bill Blazak, Utilities Director, Jim David, Mosquito Control Director, Leo Cordeiro, Solid Waste Manager, Charlie Bicht, Purchasing Manager, Don West, County Engineer, Marie Gouin, Interim ManagementIBudget Manager, Mike Bowers, Road and Bridge Manager, Deputy Nickel, Robert Nixon, Economic Development Manager, A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES (1-027) It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the minutes of the meeting held June 27, 2000 as amended; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve the minutes to the April 19,2000 Comp Plan Public Hearing; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMATION/PRESENTATION The Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners presented Employee Awards and Recognition to Public Works Employees for their achievements. Scott Herring, named President of Fla. Association of Counties Engineers and Road Superintendents Bill Zarona, named Road Engineer of The Year Mike Bowers, Road and Bridge Manager, gave a presentation on our Millings Program. The presentation was so successful that it generated a lot of excitement. Various Commissioners and representatives from counties throughout the state wìll be in St. Lucie County on July 25th to view a demonstration on how the millings are utilized. 3. PUBLIC COMMENTS(1-076) Mr. Greg Sorenson, area resident, addressed the Board regarding the Ordinance which prohibits parking of boats on residential property. Mr. Sorenson requested the Board disregard the recommendation of the Code Enforcement Board not to change the ordinance and proceed with changing the ordinance. -1- '-' "wi Mr. Brian Kilday, area resident, addressed the Board regarding item C-2B. Mr. Kilday commended staff for their work on this project. He stated the Management Plan was well written Mr. Kilday submitted the attached letter and asked it be made part of the Plan. He also commented on a resident having a problem with a sign which was placed near her property and she is now having a problem with cars parking and blocking her driveway. Ms. Jean Hearn, Indrio Road resident, addressed the Board regarding the RFP request for a tenant to utilize a dock near the historical museum. She asked the Board consider prohibiting the dock be utilized by gaming ships . Mr. Charlie Parsons, Ft. Pierce resident, addressed the boat parking ordinance and stated the county should follow the same route as the municipalities. Mr. Robert Anderson, Ft. Pierce resident, addressed the Board regarding tree limbs extending over the roadway on Michigan St. to the county line. He also asked for information regarding the Seminole site. He also asked for clarification on the county's job growth incentive program. The County Administrator advised Mr. Anderson that at the present time, the county is not moving forward with considering the site. They are waiting for a proposal for Taylor Creek and if this comes through the county will not need a disposal site. The County Attorney addressed Mr. Anderson's questions regarding the program. A.I COUNTY ATTORNEY (1-880) Job Growth Incentive Grant Agreement/Convergys Customer Management Group, Inc.,- Consider staff recommendation to approve the grant agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. The County Attorney addressed this item and reviewed the agrtement and advised the Board of the typographical errors. The County Administrator addressed the Board regarding the improvements to the Orange Blossom Mall/the Belk's facility. Ms. Gloria Griffin, Senior Director of Planning and Site Development, addressed the Board on how this site and location was picked. The Board commended the Economic Development Staff for their continued efforts to bring jobs into St. Lucie County. Mr. Robert Nixon, Economic Development Manager addressed the Board's questions regarding the company's benefit package. Com. Coward questioned if the company had consiùered how the employees would get to the site, if they had considered working with the Council on Aging to provide a transportation partnership. Ms. Griffin stated the will be reviewing this option in the future. They will wait to see what kind of transportation employees will be utilizing and what their needs would be. It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. -2- ~ ....,¡ 4. CONSENT AGENDA Com. Barnes requested item C-6F be pulled for two weeks since he felt more discussion on this issue would be needed. It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the Consent Agenda with item C-6F pulled for a later date; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List Nos. 40 and 41. 2. LEISURE SERVICES A. Florida Boating Improvement Funds/Request for Funds from City of Port St. Lucie- The Board approved FBIP funds in the amount of$35,000 to the City of Port St. Lucie for ramp replacements at Veterans Memorial Park (Rivergate) and authorized the Chairman to sign the Interlocal Agreement. B. Pepper Park Addition Management Plan- The Board approved the Pepper Park Addition Management Plan and to approve transmittal of the plan to the Florida Communities Trust for review and approval. C. Grant Acceptance- The Board approved acc~pting the Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program (FRDAP) grant in the amount of $150,000 to be used toward construction of the South County Sports Stadium and directed staff to issue the acceptance letter. D. Sponsorship Agreement- The Board approved the Sponsorship Agreement with the St. Lucie Mets and authorized the Chairman to sign the Agreement. 3. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Revocable License Agreement/Tamara M. Frank/4905 Paleo Pine Circle- The Board approved the Revocable License Agreement and authorized the Chairman to execute the agreement and instruct Ms. Frank to record the agreement in the public records of St. Lucie County. B. Ordinance No. 00-30/Permission to Advertise- The Board approved granting permission to advertise for a public hearing on the proposed Ordinance for Art in Public Places on August 1, 2000 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. C. Agreement Approval/Domestic Relations Hearing Officer- The Board approved the proposed agreement with Judith G. Hill, Esquire to serve as the Domestic Relations Hearing Officer for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, and authorized the Chairman to sign the agreement upon receipt of the signed originals from Ms. Hill. D. Permission to Advertise- Ordinance No. 00-21- The Board approved granting permission to advertise Ordinance No. 00-21 Repealing Ordinance No. 99-25 Regulating Motor Vehicle Title Loans. E. Indrio North Savannas Option Agreement/Parcel87- The Board approved the Option Agreement for Parcel 87, authorized the Chairman to execute the agreement and directed -3- 07/07,/vu FZABWA1Œ. FuND 001 001001 001125 001126 001127 001246 001247 001248 001252 001806 001807 101 101006 101211 102 102001 105 107 111 115 118 140 140120 160 170 183 183001 183002 183004 183210 185204 186 186203 304 315 316 391 392 401 401219 418 421 441 451 461 491 501 505 510 611 615 625 802 ST ~cí~ cottNTI - .öuiUUJ VARRANT tiST 141- 01-JtJt-2000 TÖ öj-Jut-lood PUNb SuMMARY TITLE Geheral Fund Recreation Special Events TC Community Action Agency FY 99/00 Section 112/MPO/FHWA Planning 99/00 National Endowment Humanities 99/00 Emergency Mgmt. Prèp & Assist 99/00 Hazardous Material Gränt TDC Planning Grant FY 99/00 Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab Grant EcotourismlHeritage Tourisum County Floridian Aquifer Yell Monitotihg Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/Impact Fées FDEP Canal & Stormwatèt Rêtrofit Unincorporated Services Fund Dràinage Maintenance MSTU Library Special Grants Fuhd Fine & Forfeiture Fund River Park I Fund Sheraton Plaza Fund Paradise Park Fund Port & Airport Fund Taylor Creek Restoration Phase I Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Court Facilities Fund Ct Administrator-19th judicia1 Cit Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.-County Arbittätion/Médiat Ct Admin.- Teen Court Courts Admin. Civil Traffic Inftàc FHFA SHIP 99/00 Recycling Operating Fund Recycling & Education 99/00 Communication System Fund County Building Fund COUnty Capital North AlA MSBU Capital Ideal Holding Road MSßU Capital Sanitary Landfill Fund FDEP Yasté Tire 99/00 Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilitiès S. Hutchinson Utilities PUhd Sports Complex Fund Building Code Fund Information Technology PUtid Health InsUrance Fund Sérvice Gätàgè Fund . .. Tourist DevelopméI1t Ttust-Adv Pund Impact Fees Fund Law Library Utility Administtation Fund GRAND TOTAL: mrms~š 63.§44.3S 10.149.00 0.00 0.00 20.80 2,623.86 3.771.13 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 6.119.00 2.300.00 1.350.00 141.11 0,00 2.11ö.ÓB i25.2~S.S4 2.51ö.34 420.24 614.30 5.go~L40 46.498.00 MO.29 110.öo 517.96 322.00 115.00 0.00 920.00 Ó.OO 23a.82 4.998.00 1.500.00 2. 111 . 26 16,04Ö.28 1.674.10 55.042.10 6.603.18 1.Ó36.S0 9.514.05 23LS4 1.SSS.54 1.811.16 1.493.àò 310.S8 3. 16~Lì5 20.49 ì,3j9.1~ 491.41 35;692.34 239.21 0.00 515,062.29 ....., PAd~ 1 l'A!ItðLL 279.;31.1ö 0.00 713.19 4,634.22 153.11 0.00 0.00 429.11 1.15j.å5 255.45 1,153.95 92.919.35 ô.bö 0.00 41.M:L15 3.1M.aö :l,öa5.91 11,15<1.99 Ö.OO 0.00 o.OÖ 6.5ê1.14 O.ÖO 2,314.11 ô.OÖ 4J:l14.Öj 1,11~.S2 Ö.ÖO 2.359.34 0.00 1.S1:l.t4 1.11~.t)O 1;O~6.6ö 0100 Ó.ÖÖ O.ÖÒ 0.00 ö.bö 29.596.25 Ó.ÖÖ 17.133.41- 194. 11 3,ž3G,Ž4 3.ö4ž.ö1 g.Ö49,ŽŽ 15.511.öS M.9Ž9,14 :l,94ê.M S.ž49.~1 2.15i.Sd O.bb 0.00 1.311.60 MO.156.M 06/30/00 FZAB\lARR FUND 001 001106 001111 001117 001125 001126 001127 001246 001247 001248 001250 001252 001806 001807 101 101002 101003 101006 101211 102 102001 105 107 112 120 122 126 139 140 140306 160 170 183 183001 183004 183105 183208 185204 186 186203 205 282 315 316 338 392 401 418 421 441 451 461 471 491 501 505 505001 510 611 625 655 '-' ST. LUdE coUNtY - goARD \lARRANT LIST #40- 14-JUN-2000 to 30-JUN-20Öö FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund FTA-001-49 USC Sec 5307 (Sec 9) FTA-001-49 USC Sec 5307 96/97 FTA 49 USC Sec 5307 98/99 TC Community Action Agency FY 99/00 Section 112/MPO/FHWA Planning 99/00 National Endowment Humanities 99/00 Emergency Mgmt. Prep & Assist 99/00 Hazardous Material Gránt TDC Planning Grant FY 99/00 North Fork St. River Greenways Urban Mobile Irrigation tab Grant Ecotourism/Heritage Tourisum County Floridian Aquifer \lell Monitoring Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option Transportation Trust/Impact FeeS FDEP Canal & Stormwàtèr Retrofit Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MStu Library Special Grants Fond Fine & Forfeiture Fund River Park II Fund The Grove Fund Indian River Estates Fund Southern oak Estates Lighting Palm Grove Fund Port & Airport Fund DOT-New N. Entrance Port Ft. Pierce Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Court Facilities Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judiciàl Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitrátion/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court Dam Relations Hearing Of£icer 99/00 Court Reporter Grant-In-Aid 99/00 FHFA SHIP 99/00 Recycling Operating Fund Recycling & Education 99/00 Beach Bond 1&8 Fund Environmental Land I&S Fond County Building Fund County Capital Anita Street Capitàl Fund Ideal Holding Road MSBU Capitàl Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.V. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund Holiday Pines Utilities Fùnd Building Code Fund Information Technology Fund Health Insurànce Fund Property/Casualty Insuränce Fund Service Garage Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fùnd Lar,.r Library Insurance Agency Fund GRAND TOTAL: ...",; ËXPtms~s 791,~9~.34 30.641.00 6;645.00 1,616.00 2;448.53 5;679.63 51.00 1.463.98 72.57 2.01 5.204.93 846.60 5.01 11.85 75,049.11 43.681.50 7.920.00 B; 145.00 2.850.00 23;660.50 13;365.05 1;842.26 2,942;121.11 506.16 137.81 829.53 108.3i 646.64 7;630.9g 1,410.75 1,091.20 220.00 94.08- 814.91 566.aÖ 6;158.52 565.00 12;907.88 5; 114.11 15,416.35 5; 110.56 8;595.51 4;450.00 71;501.65 580.00 12i.58 16;856.40 16.582.23 64.53 1;305.45 1;513.B5 12,654.23 20S.19 6;521.84 31.211.13 lB.550.80 623;980.18 . 60,1g9.93 5;685.48 5,232.92 79,400.31 5;003,029.15 PAG~ 1 i'AfftOLL 1.1l6.M 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.bÖ O.Ob o.Ob O.Ob o.bo 0.00 O.Ob 0.00 O.ÖO O.bO O.ÖÖ o.ob o.ÖO O.OÖ 0.00 b.Od 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.Öo 0.00 0.00 0.00 D.dO 0.00 0.00 o.bO b.ÖÖ 0.00 O.tro 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 4; 106.91 O.OÒ O.öO 0.00 0.00 0.00 5; 2:t~ ¡ 66 '-' """'" staff to close the transaction and record the åocument in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 4. PUBLIC WORKS A. Extension of Contracts for Environmental Consulting Services- The Board approved the final one year extension to contracts with BSE Consultants, Inc; RL Weight Environmental Consultants, Inc.; Ardaman & Associates, Inc., and Dames & Moore, Inc., for Phase I Environmental Assessment and Wetland Delineation and Phase II; Contamination Assessments, based on the satisfactory service provided by the Consultants. B. Bridge Evaluation and Design Services Agreements- The Board approved the scope and fee proposal submitted by Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., for engineering services for the design of a sheet pile repair for the annoring of 53rd St. Bridge over Canal C-25 abutments in the amount of $6,700 approved the budget as outlined and authorized the chainnan to sign the agreement. C. Work Authorization No. 5- The Board approved the work authorization to the agreement for Continuing Engineering Services, dated March 10, 1998 with Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., in the amount of$16,063 for the proposed Johnston Road MSBU Paving and Drainage Project and authorized the Chainnan to execute the work authorization. D. Bid Waiver- The Board approved declaring an emergency and waive the bid process so that East Coast Sod & Landscape can be retained for the landscaping and irrigation portion of the South County Regional Sports Stadium Project. E. Change Order No. 2- The Board approved the change order in the amount of $34,469.47 resulting in a total contract amount of $545,726.45 accepted the project, release retainage in the amount $54,453.77 make final payment in the amount of $54,622.55 to Dickerson Florida for the North 37th St. Avenue I and K improvements and authorized the Chainnan to sign the change order. F. Pennission to Award Contract- The Board approved awarding the construction contract for the South County Regional Sports Stadium to Ranger Construction Industries, Inc., in the amount of$733,883. G. Solid Waste/Proposal Approval- The Board approved th July 3,2000 Camp Dresser and McKee proposal for Landfill Gas to Energy Beneficial Use Alternative Analysis for the Glades Road Landfill in the amount of $39,560. H. Solid Waste/Bid Waiver- The B0;:~'~1 J.pprov~d the request to waive the bid procedure, declare an emergency and issue a sole source contract Lù Earth Remediation Services in the amount of $26,249.50 for the emergency repair of two air strippers at Fairwinds Golf Course. 5. MANAGEMENT/BUDGET- A. Budget Resolution No.00-155- South County Regional Stadium Note- The Board approved adopting the resolution appropriating the funds and amending the FY 2000 Budget accordingly for the $410,000 S1. Lucie County, Florida Improvement Revenue Note, Series 2000A for the South County Regional Stadium. B. Budget Resolution No. 00-1 56/Thomas J. White Stadium Improvements Note- The Board approved adopting the resolution appropriating the funds and amending the FY 2000 budget accordingly for the $410,000 St. Lucie County, Florida, Tourist Development Tax Revenu Note, Series 2000A for the Thomas J. White Stadium. -4- '-" ...." C. Grant Application- The Board approved the electronic submission of the FY 2000 State Criminal Alien Assistance Application on behalf of the St. Lucie County Sheriffs Office and authorized the County Administrator to sign the application. 6. PURCHASING A. Bid No. 00-052- The Board approved awarding the bid for the purchase of an Asphalt Vibratory Rol1er for Road & Bridge to the lowest bidder meeting specifications, L.B. Smith, Inc., in the amount of $28,945 and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. B. Bid No. 00-042- The Board approved awarding the bid for the Historical Museum Roof Replacement to the low bidder, Therma Seal Roof, in the amount of $33,950 and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. C. Permission to Advertise a Request for Proposals- The Board approved granting permission to advertise a Request for Proposals for Lobbyist Services. D. Permission to Advertise a Bid- The Board approved granting permission to advertise a bid for Electronic Equipment Maintenance for Solid Waste. E. Permission to Advertise a Bid- TLe Eoard appr0ved granting permission to advertise a bid for a pre-engineered steel building for the Fairgrounds. F. RFP No. 00-033- Roadway and Intersection Design /Short List This item was pulled. G. Bid Waiver- The Board approved the request for a bid waiver and awarded the purchase and installation of sod for the Landfill to the low quoter, Nature's Keeper, Inc., in the amount of$.14 per square foot and authorized the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. H. Bid Waiver/Emergency Dec1aration- The Board approved granting after the fact approval for emergency work performed by Matula Electric in the amount of $14, 171 for the electrical hookup of the new 800 MHz towers. 7. ADMINISTRATION Change Order No. 1- The Board approved Change Order No. 1 in the amount of$1,500 with Edlund & Dritenbas for a specialized foundation design for the Smithsonian Institution facility to house the Exploring Marine Ecosystems Exhibit. 8. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Acknowledgment of Approval for a Minor Adjustment to a Major Site Plan and Conditional Use- The Board acknowledged the approval of the S1. Lucie County Correctional Center Minor Adjustment to a Major Site Plan and conditional use for property located at 900 N. Rock Road. -5- ~ ...." REGULAR AGENDA 5. LEISURE SERVICES(I-1593) A. Blind Creek Park/Ocean to River Management Plan- Consider staff recommendation to approve the Blind Creek/Ocean to River Management Plan and to approve transmittal of the plan to the South Florida Water Management District Governing Board and the Board of Trustees of the Internal Improvement Trust fund of the State of Florida for review and approval. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (1-1721) Community Development Block Grant- Consider staff recommendation to hold a public hearing on July 11, 2000 for a time extension for the Oleander Business ParklFreedom Plastics Community Development Block Grant per grant guidelines. Ms. Nancy Phillips, representing Craig A Smith and Assoc., addressed the Board. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve Resolution No. 00-164 authorizing St. Lucie County to request a time extension to Community Development Block Grant 99DB-4Z-10-66-01E81; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. C. COUNTY ATTORNEY (1-1944) Resolution No. 00-163/Freedom Plastics, Inc., Project- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution as drafted for the issuance of the industrial development bonds for Freedom Plastics in an amount not to exceed $9,000,000. It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 00- 163; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 6. LEISURE SERVICES (1-2031 Resolution No. 00-152- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution which freezes the fees for the Savannas Recreat10n Area ul1til a revised rate structure is recommended to the Board and adopted accordingly. The County Administrator advised the Board that they have received a confirmation yesterday that the county will be receiving $250,000 from the state, however, they are not sure what it could be utilized for, but will be working with the contact in Tallahassee and will return to the Board with recommendations on how to utilize those funds. Com. Coward asked the Board to consider some of the money from the Walgreens fine to help with the entrance area to the Savannas which is presently a dirt road. He asked if a linear recreational trail with a canopy of live oak trees so tHere is some shade for those utilizing the park and also link it into a bike bath on the adjacent roadway. Com.. Hutchinson stated she would like to review a master plan for the facility before expending any funds and see if this is something the park really needs vs. electrical hookups and drainage which she feels needs to be worked on. -6- "" ...., Com. Coward stated the funds he is speaking of cannot be utilized for anything other than landscaping and would not be in conflict, however, he would not have a problem coordinating the efforts with the master plan. Com. Barnes stated he concurred with Com. Coward's comments. Com. Coward suggested utilizing millings for the road/bike path. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 7. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE (1-2031) Resolution No. 00-1 57-FDOT/SLC Roadway Transfer Agreement- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution and Roadway Transfer Agreement for the S. 25th St. Phase I Widening Project and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motIon carried unanimously. 8. COUNTY ATTORNEY Job Growth Incentive Grant AgreementIBluewater sportfishing Boats, Inc.,- Consider staff recommendation to approve the grant agreement and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 9. ADMINISTRATION (1-2831- A. Community Redevelopment Agency- Consider staff recommendation to earmark $75,000 in the General Fund Contingency for the County's portion of the cost share 50/50 with the City of Port St. Lucie for initial start up costs relating to the Community Redevelopment Agency initiative. Com. Coward had requested this be added to the agenda, however, based on the discussion at the City's budget workshop, Mr. Cooper had stated that this recommendation was for the CRA Initiative to be accomplished in house. Based on this recommendation, which he has reservations about, if they are going to proceed in honse, rather than hiring an outside specialist, there is not a need for this item to be considered at this time. It was the consensus of the Board to pull this item. No action taken. B. Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement- Consider staff recommendation to approve the Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement between St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie regarding the collection of Road Impact Fees. C. Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement:' Consider staff recommendation to approve the Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement between St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie regarding the collection of Public Buildings Impact Fees. D. Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement- Consider staff recommendation to approve the Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement between St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie regarding the collection of Parks Impact Fees. -7- '-' ...",¡ E. Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement- Consider staff recommendation to approve the Amended and Restated Interlocal Agreement between St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie regarding the collection of Library Impact Fees. The City of Port St. Lucie had requested that paragraph 4F page 6 be amended to provide that the county will each October 151 provide the city with a report outlining the collection and expenditures of impact fees for the previous years. Another item regarding the increase of Administrative fees will be brought up for discussion at a future date. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve items 9B through 9E;and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. F. Bi-Weekly Committee Reports- The Board gave updates on th various committees and advisory they serve on. UNAGENDAED- Com. Bruhn requested the Board ratify his appointment of Kathy Nelson to the Law Library Advisory Board. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward to ratify Com. Bruhn's appointment; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court -8- '-' ""'" K. Brian Killday 909 Jackson Way Ft. Pierce, FL 34949 Ms. Anna Smith, Assistant Director St. Lucie County Mosquito Control Dear Ms. Smith, I am writing on behalf of the property owners and residents of the Coastal Coves subdivision on North Hutchinson Island concerning our neighborhood meeting the night of December 14, 1999 discussing the Pepper Park Addition management plan. Thank you for initiating this meeting with us to discuss our concerns about and suggestions for the management of this park addition. This type of communication and cooperation is essential for avoiding potential future conflicts between park users and adjoining residents. For the record, I wi\1 summarize the details of this meeting and the follow-up of some issues discussed. In order to obtain input from as many concerned residents in Coastal Coves as possible, I prepared an invitation (attached) to the aforementioned neighborhood meeting and personally delivered a copy t9 every household in Coastal Coves (Jackson Way and the two 5-plex units adjoining the park addition). Sixteen residents attended this meeting, the majority being property owners directly acrøsS the canal from the park addition. As you are aware, the neighboring residents fully appreciate the tremendous beauty and passive recreational potential of the Pepper Park addition since we live, enjoy, and recreate on this beautiful part of the Indian Ri ver Lagoon. My family as well as many others in the neighborhood routinely walk, jog, and bicycle the complete circle of the impoundment area, stopping to enjoy the numerous birds, fish, otters, and other wildlife inhabiting this area. We believe that implementation of the requests and suggestions made at this meeting will lead to a management plan that provides high quality recreational benefits to the public, restores and protects the native habitat, and provides a natural buffer between recreational and residential uses. The following requests were expressed at this meeting in order to insure compatibility between the uses: The canal bank and adjacent uplands are currently heavily vegetated. There are many mangroves along the bank but the majority of vegetation is exotic (Brazilian pepPers and Australian pines). Many of the Australian pines were uprooted during hurricane Irene. Anna informed us that the goal of the State is to eradicate invasive exotic species and restore native plant communities. It was unanimously agreed that the entire canal bank on the north side of the property should be re-planted with mangroves, both mature ones that are transplanted from the impoundment when addition of culverts require their relocation, and seedlings, once the exotics are removed. In addition, the adjacent uplands should be replanted with a substantial buffer of native vegetation to provide both filtration of runoff from the proposed shell parking lot as well as screening the residences from the cars and noise of the parking lot. I stated that, as a board member of the Marine Resource Council, I have access to mangrove seedlings and can enlist volunteers to help with the restoration of the canal bank. There has been discussion in the past about possibly putting a boat ramp into the canal. The residents unanimously were adamantly opposed to this citing a number of reasons. This is a narrow finger canal and boat traffic from a ramp here would tremendously increase the noise, pollution, and erosion along the canal, thus decreasing property values and quality of life. In addition, although the canal is relatively deep, the only channel out is quite convoluted, unmarked and shallow and surrounded by lush seagrass beds that would most certainly be devastated by prop scars and groundings. One of the residents related a story of some Coast Guard officers in an inflatable boat that found their way into the canal but could not find their way back out across the shallow grass flats and had to ask for directions. In the past, a developer had '-' ....., requested a deeper channel be cut through the sea grass beds but this was denied by the FDEP and US Fish and Wildlife because of the status as an Oustanding Florida Water and Aquatic Preserve. A possible canoe launch into the canal was discussed. The residents also unanimously voted against this, citing a number of reasons, including the fact that this again could cause future conflicts between recreational users and the residents directly across the canal. The need for a canoe launch into this particular residential area was also questioned since there is already a canoe launch directly into the natural area of Pepper Park Riverside, just a stone's throwaway, that is underutilized. Jim David contacted me nnd asked me if the residents were firm on their opposition to a boat or canoe launch, stating that if they were not implemented, the county would not be responsible for maintenance of the canal. Per Jim's request, I brought this issue back to the homeowners who had attended the meeting and they are still unanimously opposed to a boat launch into the canal. Long time residents also pointed out that the county has never maintained the canal for the 40 years it has been in existence. The residents also unanimously agreed that, in order to minimize the impacts on the environment and adjacent residential uses, as well as maximize the natural area, parking should be confined to parcel G. This is indeed adequate parking area if this park extension is going to be a passive use low impact natural area for fishermen, birdwatchers, hikers, joggers, and bicyclists. As a comparison, the Jack IslandlKings Island preserve contains nearly 600 acres. The parking area at Jack Island is approximately 150 feet long and consists of 10 parking spaces, yet there are no complaints of lack of parking there. This proposed passive use area is only 118 acres. Parcel G is over 470 feet long and wider than the parking area of Jack Island, capable of providing over three times the number of parking spaces. This should be more than adequate unless a more intense use is envisioned. Jim asked me to re-visit the fsSue of limiting the parking to parcel G with the residents. Because of the reasons cited above, the residents are still unanimously in favor of limiting parking to parcel G. The residents unanimously agreed that public access to this park extension should be limited to daytime hours only. This is consistent with access to the other parks in the area, including the rest of Pepper Park and Jack Island. It would be inconsistent to allow nighttime access to this particular section of the park, particularly in light of the fact that this is the section closest to the residential uses. If nighttime access is required for fishing, this should be provided in the existing parking lot south of the firehouse, especially since this would supply direct access to the fishing piers in wildcat cove without having to drive through private residential property. The proposed management plan for the Pepper Park extension as discussed at our neighborhood meeting can be somewhat compared to a scaled down version of Jack Island State Preserve. This passive use segment of the park perfectly complements the higher intensity recreational uses contained in the rest of Pepper Park. Thank you again for soliciting our input and allowing us to be an integral part of the management plan for the Pepper Park extension. Also. thank you for the tremendous job your department has been doing in obtaining grants for such acquisitions of conservation and recreational open space. You are indeed making St. Lucie County an even more wonderful place to live. Sincerely. K. Brian Killday )<.~~ /2.J2.o/cr9 Attachments: 1) Invitation to neighborhood meeting. 2) Names and signatures of neighbors attending the meeting. Wott: :k~j 0.150 ((}",'t-«i i1f S;1ht'turt5' ~~ o1he~ h-ei5hborJ who d I h 0 1 a. ìÎ e ~ d Î h t Þ\ -e e. 1- ~ h J h V Î art 5 ì J 'II i kJ 0 V¡ 10 t ~ ~) I € t-i ! r . ~ h ') J 2 /2. J / ~ 4) Not t: v j nJ. cu. tef t~O)~ Wh 0 (),' J e.J T k e. "" ,.;,,/-\\ W," (ß / 1-/2tl,~) v' V vi Meeting Attendee Address .y? j-t, ;jJ..J I/t / ~ (, ¥/ó? o ~-7Ç S"~7 ')o.57s -ScJb"/ il 'fl:o-tf76l( 'I, , , V tIJOP-A . Cj 11 q~1 9;1 1110' - '/ t, %1 r~ ~~ ¿I' ~ --1 ó ~ & -1-...- i ~"o- .;:1'/ -;;.? .4Iç ð-'317C " . L¡(p $" "" ¡;¿l r f ~ (.( !f:,..:¡e/~ 1kg-'fI'/)... ¿JC: ~~~j77 ai'//d" 't t~YLA ðP4 ~~J/~if-?D5q o r' II y;,}J æ .::> Jl.yv'\~j"r"" k. .~ L[ 6<¡J- 037~ð2-J2.0~ / ~ / tJ.-j;;.o t-j6 () - / tiC¡ 5-- ~~ ~ H ~ qt/ .Jl"u·SOA-' WI'>-<f g ~ ¡zlzo/?? (/ ~ I~J:I/~1 ~ .. 1¥¿o('C¡ tbr 4"rfCt II v ,/ V ./ r/ '~·E·¡e {j G ~ I;};' . R:. '- ~ V IJ D teE- \/ II LL II v',.e d ¡;'. - 1".,11' '1/ [) " . Ý . ";,....: . ..... - . .Ja .." __ tJ _.. ' . ... '- .". .. ...". . _" '..r . .'( ¡/ -.J. &' ,í II Iv.,. ,"" t ~ 1-1 tv f1'~ {" ~ .b~ V k. BV'i()¡kK~ I~ar.lr . qo~ Juk>O'-l. \(I__y 1/ 5 h ¡1,V ( J f::L Ilcuty 'ì 0 ~ TII-lk)o"\ W4.y 3 t./o I ;lfrlA j·¥61 t1J It! /l /l " n v ;; CAe c 11/"'70 C A e,eJIfr1 Ù úJ~ ~ cð1-h4~q w- ~) 117t "-' '-' Neighborhood Meeting with Anna Smith, Assistant Director of Mosquito Control. Tuesday, December 14, 1999 6:30 P.M. Brian and Shari Killday' s 909 Jackson Way Phone: 561-468-0372 St. Lucie County is in the process of purchasing all of the land south of the south canal of Jackson Way (west of the firehouse). This includes Bart's Bay (which has already been pu~chased), th~ other vacant lots (including the one on which the junk trailer is sitting), and all of the mosquito impoundment. Tl1ése parcels are to be added to Pepper Park Riverside to expand the county park. Anna Smith is currently writing a management plan for this area for submission to the State of Florida and would like input from those most affected by this plan, the nearby residents. Current suggested plans call for removal of exotic vegetation and restoration of native vegetation such as mangroves along the water, mulched parking area, and possibly a canoe launch (non-motorized vessels). Please attend this important meeting if at all possible to let Anna know your concerns and suggestions on such issues as traffic, vegetation and screening buffers, etc. This is your chance to help shape the future of your neighborhood. If you can not attend this meeting, please list your suggestions and comments and either give them to me to forward on to Anna or send them directly to her at St. Lucie County Mosquito Control. Please feel free to call me at the number above with any question/comments. Leave a message and I will return your call as soon as I can. Thanks. Brian .. '-" "" JULY 18, 2000 6:00 PM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT-Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. , '-" """ ßOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 www.stlucieco.gov AGENDA 1. MINUTES ¡}pC<--- &,A ,/ r t /Jç¡v /Jtcr y.:} .. p6;~ Approve the minutes of the meeting held July 11, 2000. July 18, 2000 6:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 2. PROCLAMATION/PRESENTATION Resolution No. 00-161- Consider approval of the resolution commending the Amateur Athletic Union/y outh Basketball of America (MU /YBOA) Basketball T earn of the Treasure Coast Basketball Club for their achievement in competing and winning five of the six tournaments entered, which included the State Championship for their age division of seventeen and under/juniors; and further, wishing them good luck as they compete in the National Championship Tournament to be held at Disney Wide World of Sports on July 24,2000, through July 30, 2000. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA PUBLIC HEARINGS A. Ordinance No. 00-22 / 2000 Economic Development Exemption /J Application / Bee Electronics, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to adopt j' the ordinance as drafted, establishing an exemption from certain ad y / (), valorem taxation. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to app.eal any action taken by the Board at tl"iese meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may Tleeö to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the reç¡uest of any party to the proceedings. Individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any indivlaua! testitying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability. reHuirin~ accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462:'777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. " '-' .'tJ REGULAR AGENDA JULY 18, 2000 PAGE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED) COUNTY ATTORNEY (CONTINUED) / " ~. ¡ f y) fPJ~ ptf Ordinance No. 00-23 / 2000 Economic Development Exemption pplication / Centaur Manufacturing - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the ordinance as drafted, establishing an exemption from certain ad valorem taxation. Ordinance No. 00-26 / 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application / Bluewater Sport Fishing Boats, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the ordinance .as drafted, establishing an exemption from certain ad valorem taxation. Ordinance No. 00-27 / 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application / QVC St. Lucie, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the ordinance as drafted, establishing an exemption from certain ad valorem taxation. Ordinance No. 00-28 / 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application / Orchid Island Juice Company - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the ordinance as drafted, establishing an exemption from certain ad valorem taxation. Resolution No. 00-08S - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution providing for the creation and establishment of a Special Street Lighting Improvement District in Pine Hollow Subdivision and authorize the C . man and County Attorney to execute the resolution. Resolution No. 00-lS4 - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the resolution creating the Academy Drive M.S.B.U; authorizing the County Engineer to proceed with the engineering and design of the Project Pursuant to the procedures set forth in Chapter 1-13.S; St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances, authorizing the County Engineer to advertise for bids for construction; and to prepare an interlocal agreement with the City of Fort Pierce and the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority. , '-" ....., REGULAR AGENDA JULY 18,2000 PAGE THREE i,'("~ ..,. I.'. I. .. ,.."l .. ,~,_/ \ " I~ / I ....- ? PUBLIC HEARINGS (CONTINUED) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . . ~'Resolution No. 00-1.17 / James and Shirley Ca~le / Quas~- Judici~l-Sonsider . staff recommendatIOn to approve the resolutIOn grantmg Prehmmàry:and 11/J ,() I~ fV Final Planned Development Site Plan approval and a change in zoning from jlVlÇ 1/' the RS-3 (Residential, Single-Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the PNRD 11~6ì ~ (planned Non-Residential Development - Cagle's Cove) Zoning District for {/'1 V the project to be known as Cagle's Cove - PNRD. Location: S61S Oleander Avenue, west side of Oleander Avenue, approximately 3S0 feet south of ( i Gopher Ridge Road. I(}/'d t/ IY~ Resolution No. 00-122 / Roger Medema / Quasi-Judicial - Consider staff /~( 1(/ (recommendation to approve the resolution granting an extension of the 'Y Planned Development Site Plan approval and a change in zoning from the ,h-l PUD (planned Unit DeVelOpm¡t - Pal1áÍ Breezes Club) Zoning District to the I . " PUD (planned Unit Develo~ cjtáYIh Breezes Club - MHP) Zoning District. I UJ! ~ LO. catio?-: Nort.~s.ide 0 ge Avenue, a~proximately l,~OO feet east of ~ wJ,ßthe.Flond~~~PI . 6~d?JÝ->- d t:..:Þ6- c~ C~d,r;-c-(..i,4.._ It~tv/ill ¿,-- 1 v~~7í~ 19 ~ 71 ./J. .:/?VlF''- - L.,/N' J Ù ,,-,;7 / LY~ . SJ. ~t-~ ~o. 00-118 / Bruce Neal / uasi- udicial - Consider staff I recommendation to approve the resolution granting a change in zoning I . from the IX (Industrial, Extraction) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, II Light) Zoning District. Location: South side of St. Lucie Boulevard, l'J~üUI m..n"t._ approximately O.S mile west of sa~ Road. l 6, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ..;~ ú,r ¡l-- ßff ---; '_"'~ /J;-:::: , . ."" '- "",-. A. Tourism / Agreement Extension - Con ider staff recommendation to .h......... ~ approve the one (1) year extension to the agreement with R. J. Gibson, Inc., G' ¡t for advertising services in an amount not to exceed $ 2 SO,OOO, and authorize .....- L.L;; the Chairm~n to sign the agreement ;won receipt of the .signed origi~a~ / . / from R. J. GIbson. Þ 'Ic¡Þ--'J 0¡ ¡~- ~,..~A- ýi) )Î S.L'. ¿--t: JV c¿ ¿J #:1. J- \. Resolution No. 00-120/ Freedom Plastics - Consider staff rec6mmendation to approve the resolution granting a Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan Approval for the project known as Freedom Plastics. Location: East and West side of Enterprise Road. ~~Resolution No. 00-119/ Dollom, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to Vñ~ approve the resolution granting Major Site Plan approval, subject to the 6rtN1 eleven listed special conditions, for the project to be known as Savanna /' Club Apartments. Location: North and South sides ?f. S,avanna Club ~ Boulevard, approximately 800 feet East of South U;SJÞß"""'~ ...... /..::.. . {/ c~~ ;~,-<.N h- brv9" ¿,,:J~h._~ ~/.~ /..., II'.../ ,GJ-..J c.-1- d C . ¿".,. /1- ..tC-r - c:. - ¡¿ /.:k- c¿) 'd . /~ C.-<...C<--._J7>o_ <""'3 '] -....- s .;2 ,. " ß /"J-- C/./' £/ ~ c/ ' ;}Ja,,¿f;"/k''- ,/0)" Þ£. /f;:? /frO) þtfL- Ø7.<J"""r ð- /~o. ~--. '-' ....,; CONSENT AGENDA Julv 18. 2000 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 41 2. PUBLIC WORKS A. Change Order No.1 - Consider staff recommendation to accept and approve the final change order, decreasing the contract amount by $124,672.29 to a final contract amount of $6S4,973.88, authorize the Chairman to sign the change order, release retainage, and make final payment in the amount of $6S,497.39 for the 1998-99 Annual Resurfacing Contract with Ranger Construction Industries, Inc. B. Temporary Non-Exclusive Drainage Easement with St. Lucie West - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Temporary Non-Exclusive Drainage Easement and authorize the Chairman to sign the easement. 3. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Deputy Sheriff's Blanket Bond - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chairman to execute the bond. B. Partial Release of Lien - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chairman to sign the Partial Release of lien for St. Lucie County Code Enforcement Board Order Imposing Fine/Lien dated October 6, 1999 and recorded in Official Record Book 1261, Page 1793, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. C. Indrio North Savannas / Parcel 70 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Option Agreement for Parcel 70, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct staff to close the transaction and record the document in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. D. Plat Approval/South County Regional Stadium - Consider staff recommendation to approve Plat No. 127 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Plat. 4. VETERANS SERVICES Budget Amendment No. 00-146 and Equipment Request No. 00-230/ Transfer of Funds - Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget arnendment and equipment request in the amount of $980 to cover the required cost share for installation of Y2K upgrades at the South County Courthouse Annex Building. '-' ....,¡ CONSENT AGENDA JULY 18, 2000 PAGE TWO S. ADMINISTRATION A. Restudy Coordination Committee - Consider staff recommendation that the Board ratify Commissioner Coward's appointment of Debbie Crouse to serve on the Restudy Coordination Committee. B. Contractor's Certification Board - Consider staff recommendation that the Board ratify Commissioner Lewis' re-appointment of Craig Dunkelberger to serve on the Contractor's Certification Board. 6. LEISURE SERVICES Permission to Bid - Consider staff recommendation to approve the request for bids for construction of boardwalks at the Children's Environmental Learning Museum. 7. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Tourism / R.J, Gibson Invoices - Consider Tourist Development and staff recommendation to approve payment of the April invoices to R. J. Gibson in the amount of $26,641.13. B. Tourism / R.J, Gibson Invoices - Consider Tourist Development and staff recommendation to approve payment of the May invoices to R. J, Gibson in the amount of $6,479.20. C. Permission to Advertise / South A-1-A Multi-Use Path - Consider staff recommendation to grant the request for permission to advertise for bids and to authorize the Management and Budget Department to transfer the appropriate funds from Road Impact Fee Zone S into the project reserve accounts for this construction project. The estimated construction budget for this first phase is just under $700,000. ~ .....,; AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. ~ DATE: July 18, 2000 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 00-161 - Commending the Amateur Athletic Union/Y outh Basketball of Americà (AAUNBOA) Basketball Team ofthe Treasure Coast Basketball Club for their achievement in competing and winning five of the six tournaments entered, which included the State Championship for their age division of seventeen and under/juniors; and further, wishing them good luck as they compete in the National Championship Tournament to be held at Disney Wide Wodd of Sports on July 24, 2000, through July 30, 2000. BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 00-161 as drafted. [x] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CE: COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: ~ Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 ". ~ ..."" RESOLUTION NO. 00-161 A RESOLUTION COMMENDING THE AMATEUR ATHLETIC UNION/YOUTH BASKETBALL OF AMERICA (AAU/YBOA) BASKETBALL TEAM OF THE TREASURE COAST BASKETBALL CLUB FOR THEIR ACHIEVEMENT IN COMPETING AND WINNING FIVE OF THE SIX TOURNAMENTS ENTERED, WHICH INCLUDED THE STATE CHAMPIONSHIP FOR THEIR AGE DIVISION OF SEVENTEEN AND UNDER/JUNIORS; AND FURTHER, WISHING THEM GOOD LUCK AS THEY COMPETE IN THE NATIONAL CHAMPIONSHIP TOURNAMENT TO BE HELD AT DISNEY WIDE WORLD OF SPORTS ON JULY 24, 2000, THROUGH JULY 30, 2000 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following detenninations: 1. The Amateur Athletic Union/Y outh Basketball of America (AAUNBOA) Basketball Team ofthe Treasure Coast Basketball Club competed and won five ofthe six tournaments entered, which included the State Championship for their age division of 17 and under/Juniors. 2. This group oflocal high school players, who will be entering the 12th grade in the fall, have qualified for the National Championship Tournament to be held at Disney Wide Wodd of Sports from July 24,2000, through July 30,2000. 3. This Board believes the members of the Amateur Athletic Union/Youth Basketball of America Basketball Team of the Treasure Coast Basketball Club should be commended for their achievements. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of8t. Lucie County, Florida: .. 'w' .'w1I 1. This Board does hereby commend the Amateur Athletic UnionIY outh Basketball of America Basketball Team ofthe Treasure Coast Basketball Club for their achievement in competing and winning five of the six tournaments entered, which included the State Championship for their age division of 17 and under/Juniors. 2. This Board does further wish each member of the Treasure Coast Basketball Club good luck as they compete in the National Championship Tournament to be held at Disney Wide World of Sports on July 24,2000, through July 30,2000. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 18th day of July, 2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY P.OJ. . ..- ~- .-- . - -. -- ... _..c. .......... -..I.......,..." y ~ '-'L.:t¡J, J.J. ~ \..,.,. 3192 W. Midway Road Ft Pierce, FL 34981-4957 Phone (561) 465.0410· Fal (561) 465-9904 FAX TRANSMTITAL )A TE X N\JM8IiR HuMðl!Jll OF PAQelS INC\.IJDfNG THIS SNIST: _ EF¡R~CE ES$AGe: '~ ~ 57 /J/,~ ~- j70SÒ 4zÆ:- 7r~ ~d'6 /~ fl. ljt~J) 1/ . LAJc5 d ß~~ ßL'C.4-vO/)Z'-.J L;o;e-.J /v& µ/~ 7;? lbtJg.... Sum(/l1ifS£.ud (1() ~l t5uJ O1Lìs+ ~ hlgh-t Mtty- ~ '", ..-... f ) ¡ -¡ ,. / ..' f)¡ DÛL:rj -Kr6t(50n C~(OJ<?d' ~Cfroc~( 1ll'l ~bu.l(û money, - . rvrv ~(\f 0 W (xdd ,^v\sw£r~r QWsh~ ~ DOLX¡A-, /;Ü'/I r~V¡e(Q)· ll1CUJc~ ( lCLI~ ONF1DENTlAL: This message is ¡lItended for the use of the individwzl or entity to which it is addressed an ay contllin information rhat is privileged, confidentio.1 and uempt from disclosure. If the reader of this messag not the intendéd recipient or an employee or agent responsibltl for dl!livertng the message to the inttlntÚd re Dient, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distributiolZt or copying of this message is $tricdy prohit !d. If you hav~ receiv~d .this communicatton in error, please notify us ímmedi4lely by telephone and return tn iginal me.rsage ttJ us by maiL 1ñIJllk you. .Jun---ZB-OO 01: 45P '. ... .'w' ...., P.01 T &III8~(ij Earl Gordon 3327 Orange Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34947 561-465-0440, office 561-464-2271, home Dear Friends, June 27,2000 For the past five years I have organized and coached an AAUNBOA basketball team. Our team consists of tocal high school players who are entering the 12th grade in the fall. This is a highly competitive league that requires us to travel and compete in tournaments all over the state of Florida. This year has been phenominall Out of the six tournaments we entered, we won five. This includes the State Championship for our age division. Incredible! We have qualifléd for the National Championship Tournament to be held at Disney Wide World of Sports July 24-30. Only the best of the best will be there. CoHege coaches and scolJt$ from all over the country will be present to observe our talented youth. I guarantee we will make St. Lucie County proud- Winning is only part of the gratification from this exper~ence. Even more rewarding is sharing the overall experience with this fine group of young people proudly representing St. Lucie County. Too often we only hear about the negative things that young people are involved in. The good stories seldom make the news, This is truly a good story. I am very grateful to all the people, parents, and businesses that have so generously helped us this year. The team has also been working hard to raise money through car washes and other activities. As we prepare to go to Nationals we estimate that it will cost approximately $5.000 to attend. I am hesitant to ask for donations but since this is such a unique occurance I am going to do so. We will not be back agaÎn next year asking for more. This is it! I realize you get hit from every angle for donations but this type of event changes young peoples lives and you can make a difference. W. need your help. If you would like to make a donation, please make çhecks payable to Treasure Coast Basketball Club and mail directly to me at the above addre6S. AIt contributions will directly benefit our team. Sincerely, ¿;;J )(~ Earl Gordon ~ '-' AGENDA REQUEST IT~NO. 6!t DATE: July 18, 2000 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application - Bee Electronics, Inc. - Ordinance No. 00-22 BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMEND A TION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Ordinance No. 00-22 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: 4-1 (Coward) E: uglas Anderson ounty Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 '-" .., INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 00-2006 DATE: July 6,2000 SUBJECT: 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application - Bee Electronics, Inc. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: On October 6,1992, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 22-24 establishing a program to exempt certain new and expanding businesses from ad valorem taxation as allowed by state law, a copy of which is attached. The ordinance was adopted subject to a referendum held on November 3, 1992 which passed. Also attached is a copy of Resolution No. 92-264 adopted on October 20, 1992 establishing a property tax exemption phase out schedule and a property tax exemption eligibility rate schedule for new or expanding businesses. Attached is an application filed by Bee Electronics, Incoo As required by state law, the application was forwarded to the St. Lucie County Property Appraiser for review. The comments and findings of the Property Appraiser contained in the application. As the memorandum states, \ Bee Electronics submitted the required information and met the statutory definition of a new business. The Property Appraiser's estimate of the taxable value lost to the County if the exemption is granted is $1,399,750. The Property Appraiser's estimate of revenue which would be lost to the County during the current fiscal year if the exemption were granted is '-' ...." $12,381.77. The application reflects 125 St. Lucie County residents to be employed by Bee Electronics, Incoo Under the property tax eligibility chart, it appears that Bee Electronics, Inc. would receive a ten (10) year exemption, phased as follows: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 Year 10 100'Yo 90% 80'Yo 70% 60'Yo 50% 40 'Yo 30% 20'Yo 10 'Yo Also attached is a copy of draft Ordinance No. 00-22 which, if adopted, would grant Bee Electronics, Inc. an economic ad valorem tax exemption for a period of ten (10) years. . Permission to advertise was granted on June 27, 2000. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Ordinance No. 00-22 as drafted. l DSM/ caf Attachments . \ð s '-" ......, ORDINANCE NO. 92-24 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1-19.3 (TAXATION) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY CREATING ARTICLE V (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTIONS) RELATING TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE COUNTY; ESTABLISHING AN EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAXATION FOR CERTAIN NEW AND EXPANDING BUSINESS PROPERTIES; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING PROCEDURES FOR APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION; SPECIFYING DUTIES OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER IN CONNECTION· WITH SUCH PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY; FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; EFFECTIVE DATE; ADOPTION; AND CODIFICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes, provides the Board of County Commissioners may hold a referendum granting Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions under Section 3, Article VII of the State Constitution. 2. This Board believes that amending Chapter 1-19.3 (Taxation) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, ~ by creating Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions for a new or expanding business is in the best interest of the health( safety and public welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: btruck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 1 ::t1"rJ~ CD f-'·O ()I-':þ o CD ::1 ~ ::1 o.ZCD CD ~ 0. =r: " 0 (1)1-' o~~ I-' ::3 1 ~ t:;l-1n 1 ~\I-' \D LV CD WN~ 010 ~~H¡ "f'rIrt UlI.V::J *'"0\ CD :Þ n . ..... 3: ~ . () o¡:: ::t1 ..... rt t¡j on 00 ::;.;:¡:: ~ rt 01 (X)C/) N;t" Wt"" ¡:: () ..... '"dCD :Þ øn MO ¡:: ::1 N~ 0\ o o '-" ....., PART A. AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 1-19.3 (TAXATION) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Chapter 1-19.3 (Taxation) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, is hereby amended by creating Article V (Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions) to read as follows: Chapter 1-19.3 TAXATION ARTICLE V. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTIONS Section 1-19.3-51. Short Title. This Ordinance shall be known as County Ordinance No. 92-24, "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Requlations of St. Lucie County, Florida." Section 1-19.3-52. . Enactment and Authoritv. Pursuant to Section 3, Article VII of the State Constitution and in accordance with Chapters 125, 163, 192, 196 and 214, Florida Statutes and Florida Department of Revenue Rules, Chapter 12D-7, Florida Administrative Code, incorporated municipalities and counties individually or ln combination are authorized and empowered to adopt, amend or revise and enforce an ordinance relatinq to economic development ad valorem tax exemptions, after the electors of such municipality or county, votinq on the question in a referendum, authorize the adoption of such ordinance. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 2 o ::ö D: o o ~ o ()) N W 't1 :Þ ø trI N m o t-J '-' """ ,Section 1-19.3-53. Jurisdiction. The area sub'ect to this Ordinance shall be incor orated and unincorporated St. Lucie County. Section 1-19.3-54. Purpose and Intent. The public health. safety. comfort. economy. order. convenience and eneral welfare re uire the harmonious orderl and ro ressive develo ment of new business and ex ansion of existin business within Florida and its incorporated municipalities and counties. In furtherance of this qeneral purpose counties by Cha ters 125 163 192 196 and 214 Florida Statutes and Florida De artment of Revenue Rules Cha ter 12D-7 Florida Administrative Code. are authorized and empowered to adopt. amend or revise and enforce measures relatinq to economic development ad valorem tax exem tions for new business and ex ansion of existin business. It is the intent' of this Ordinance to secure or to ensure: ~ The establishment of criteria for qrantinq such exem tions to certain t es of businesses or industries or for denvinq exemptions on a rational. nonarbitrarv~ nondiscriminatory basis by the Board of Count_ Commissioners. ~ No recedent shall be im lied or inferred b the ~rantin~ of an exemption to a new or expandinq business. Applications for exemptions shall be considered bv the Board of Count v Commissioners on a case-by-case basis for each a lication after consideration of the Pro ert Appraiser's report on that application. ~ ranted shall a to one hundred ercent 100% of the assessed value of all im~rovements to real property made by or for the use of a new business and all tanqible personal property of such new business, or up to one hundred percent (100%) of the assessed value of all added improvements to real property which additions are made to facilitate the expansion of an Struc]c through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 3 o ::ö OJ o o ~ o 00 N W "tJ :Þ GJ ['rj N m o N '-' .....,I L. tion shall be u to a full ten time the exemption is qranted. ~ No exemption shall be qrantedon the land which new or expanded businesses are to be located. h No exem tion shall be ranted on mana ement district taxes or on taxes of bonds or taxes authorized a vote the County pursuant to Sections 9 or the State Constitution. school or water levied for a ent of the electors of 12, Article VII, of Section 1-19.3-55. Definition of Terms. The followinq words, phrases and terms shall have the same .. meanin s attributed to them in current Florida Statutes and the Florida Administrative Code, except where the context clearly indicates otherwise: .L.. A licant - An erson or cor oration submittin an Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption application to the Board. ~ Board - The St. Lucie County Board of Commissioners. b. Business Any activity enqaqed in by any person, cor oration or com an wi th the ob' ect of rivate or a~n benefit or advanta e either direct or indirect. 3.1 New Business _ -ª..:.. A business establishinq 10 or more iobs to employ 10 or more full-time employees in this County, which manufactures, processes, StrucJc through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 4 o ~ tJ: o o ="= o Q) tv W 't1 :Þ GJ ['Ij tv 0\ o W '-' "'-" compounds, fabricates, or produces for sale items of tanqible personal property at a fixed location and which comprises an industrial or o ::0 0:1 o o ::r-: manufacturinq plant: h A business establishinq 25 or more iobs to employ 25 or more full-time employees in this County, the sales factor of which, as defined o Q) N by s. 220.15 (5), Florida Statutes, for the W facility with respect to which it requests an "d :Þ ø tr economic development ad valorem tax exemption is less than '0.50 for each year the exemption is claimed. No business enqaqed in retail N 0\ o ~ operations as defined herein shall be eliqible for an exemption pursuant to this subsection b: or ~ An office space in this state owned and used by a corporation newly domiciled in this County: provided such office space houses 50 or full-time such more employees of corporation: provided that such business or office .first beqins operation on a site clearly separate from any other commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 5 3.2 ~ ....., 'ª-=- Any business located in an area desiqnated enterprise zone that first beqins operation on a site clearly separate from any other commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. Expansion of Existinq Business A.:.. A business establishinq 10 or more iobs to employ 10 or more full-time employees in this County, which manufactures, processes, compounds, fabricates, or produces for sale items of tanqible personal property at a fixed location and which comprises an industrial or manufacturinq plant: or ~ Any business establishinq 25 or more iobs to employ 25 or more full-time employees in this County, the sales factor of which, as defined by s.220.15(5), Florida Statutes, for the facility with respect to which it requests an economic development ad valorem tax exemption is less than 0.50 for each year the exemption is claimed provided that such business increases operations on a site colocated with a commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business, resultinq in a net increase in employment of not less than 10 percent or StrucJe through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passage's are 6 o :ö tJ: o o ~ o Q) tv W 't1 :Þ C) [11 N 0\ o 01 ,; I:' ~ .-.../ an increase in productive output of not less than 10 percent. No business engaqed in retail operations as defined herein shall be eliqible for an exemption pursuant to this subsection b. ~ Any business located in an enterprise zone that increases operations on a site colocated with a commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. 3.3 Business enqaqed in retail operations _ a business en a ed in a sale to a consumer or to an e~son of an item of tanqible personal property for any purposes other than for resale. ~ Department - The Florida Department of Revenue. ~ Im rovements - Ph sical chan es made to raw land and structures placed on or under the land surface. All ersonal to facilitate an ex ansion of an existin business rovided that the ersonal is added or increased on or after the da the ordinance is ado ted. However ersonal uired to re lace existin shall not be considered to facilitate a businesses expansion. ~ Sales Factor - A fraction the numerator of which is the total sales of the taxpayer in this state durinq the Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 7 o :0 c::J o o ;:¡;: o Q) N W ~ :Þ G) tI] N 0\ o 0\ '-' ..,; taxable year or period and the denominator of which is the total sales of the taxpayer everyWhere durinq the taxable year or period. (See Section 220.15(5). Florida Statutes for specifics of computation). Section 1-19.3-56. General. The Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption is a local option tax incentive for new or expandinq business which may be qranted or refused at the sole discretion of the Board. To apply for such an exemption a business locatinq or expandinq in the corporated or unincorporated area of St·. Lucie County must file an application (Florida Department of Revenue Form DR-41a...- See Attachment 1) with the Board. Satisfactory proof that the business meets the criteria for exemption as a new business or expansion of an existinq business as defined by this Ordinance must accompany the Application. The Application shall be filed on or before 1 March of the year in which an exemption is requested. Exemption from County tax may only be qranted by the Board. The exemption qranted under this Ordinance shall not accrue to improvements to . real property made by or for the use of new or expandinq businesses when such improvements have been included on the tax rolls prior to the referendum authorizinq this Ordinance. Section 1-19.3-57. Procedure. Before the Board acts on an application. it must be submitted to the Property Appraiser for review. After careful consideration. £trucJe through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 8 o ::t OJ o o :;¡::: o Q) tv W "0 :Þ G) tI:I tv m o -..J the '.~" .'. '-' ..." raiser shall re ort to the Board concernin the fiscal impact of qrantinq exemptions. The raiser's Re ort shall include the followin : .L. The total revenue available to the County for the current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources. 1..:. The amount of revenue foreqone by the County for the çurrent fiscal ear because of economic develo ment ad valorem tax exemptions previously qranted. ~ An estima.te of the amount of revenue which would be toreqone for the current fiscal year if the exem tion is ~ranted to the new or expandinq business. .L. A determination that the business meets the definition of ã new or expand in business as defined in this Ordinance U on re uest the De artment will rovide the Pro ert A raiser such information as it ma have avail Ie to assist in makinq this determination. the After consideration of the report of the Property Appraiser, Board ma choose to ado t an Ordinance the tax exem tion to a business. The Ordinance shall be ado ted in the same manner as an other ordinance of the Count . The Ordinance shall include the followinq information: .L. 1..:. ~ .L. The name and address of the new or expandinq business. The amount of revenue available from ad valorem tax sources for the current fiscal year, revenue foreqone for the current fiscal Year because of economic development ad valorem tax exemptions currently in effect, and the amount of estimated revenue which ,,·:ould be foreaone because of the exem tion ranted to th8 new or ex andin business. The ex iration date of the exem tion. U to ten ears from date of Board adoption of the Ordinance qrantin~ the exemption) A findin that the business meets the definition of a new business or an expansion of an existinq business. Struo]c through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 9 o :u tI:I o o ~ o (X) N W '1:J :to C') trJ N 0\ o (X) '-' .." ~ The Board I s business no exemption. authori tv to revoke an exemption if the lonqer satisfies the criteria for the Section 1-19.3-58. Fees. Fees charqed to offset the cost of processinq the Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Application or any Exemption Ordinance shall be adopted bv the Board bv resolution. Section 1-19.3-59. E1iqib1e Business or Industrv. An business or indust as defined in Section 1-19.3-55 Para ra h 3.1 and 3.2 that does not as an ineli ible business or industry as defined in Section 1-19.3-60. When considerinq the issue of whether or not a busiQess or industry is an eliqible business as defined herein, the Board shall consider the anticipated number of employees, averaqe waqe, type of industr or business environmental im acts volume of business or roduction or an other information· relatin to the is sue of whether the proposed development would siqnificantlv improve economic development in St. Lucie County prior to acceptinq the Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Application. The criteria for determininq the lenqth of an exemption and the be formulated b the Board b resolution. The criteria shall provide for incentives for businesses that employ St. Lucie County residents who establish permanent domicile pursuant to Florida Statutes. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 10 o ::0 tJ: o o ~ o CO N W '1:! :Þ ø tr N 0\ o \D \w ....; . Section 1-19.3-60. Ineliqible Business or Industry. Any business or industry in violation of any federal, state, or local law or requlation qoverninq environmental matters such as air, water, and noise pollution. Section 1-19.3-61. Appeals. The decision of the Board not to qrant an Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption to a particular business or industry is subiect only to iudicial review pursuant to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Section 1-19.3-62 - 1-19.3-70. Reserved. PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislatu~e applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, and adopted prior to January 1, 1969, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. £truck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 11 o ::0 OJ o o ~ o Q) tv W "CI :Þ ø tt1 N 0\ 1-1 o '-' wi PART D. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304. PART E. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect only upon approval by the voters on November 3, 1992 of the ballot question authorized by the Board in Resolution No. 92-175. PART F. ADOPTION. After motion anà second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Jim Minix AYE Vice Chairman Jack Krieger AYE Commissioner Judy Culpepper AYE Commissioner Havert L. Penn AYE Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner AYE PART G. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, and the word ""ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that parts B to G shall not be codified. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 12 o ::d tJ: o o ::¡;; o Q) N W '"ó :Þ ø [rj N m ~ ~ '-' ...I PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 6th day of October, 1992. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSI~NERSI\: ST. LUCIE COUNTY,FLORIDA :: ~) ~.~:.. ~ ~ 1 CHAIRMAN . -'j \ ;:. j C·" ." v .. ~ . l~ - :.. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 13 o ::0 o:J o o :;¡:: " o CD tv W "U :x:- C) tr1 N 0\ ¡.J tv ~ j Douglas Dixon, r-~rk of the Circuit Court - 't. Lucie County File Number: ~ 11 7 1 7 OR BOOK c...,¡ 13 PAGE 03 5 7 Recorded: 10-2~92 02:43 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 92-264 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION PHASE OUT SCHEDULE AND PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION ELIGIBILITY RATE SCHEDULE FOR NEW OR EXPANDING BUSINESS APPLYING FOR AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 92-24 WHEREAS, the Board of County commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. On September 8, 1992, this Board adopted Resolution 92- 175 which implemented the provisions of Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes which authorized the Board of County commissioners the authority to call a referendum on the issue of granting a local Option Economic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption. 2. On October 6, 1992, this Board adopted Ordinance No. 92- 24, which amended Chapter 1-19.3 (TAXATION) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, by creating Article V - Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption. Enactment of Ordinance No. 92-24 is contingent on a majority vote in the November referendum election. 3. Section 1-19.3-59 (Eligibility Business or Industry) of Ordinance No. 92-24 provides for the formulation of criteria for determining the length of an exemption and the percentage amount of an exemption pursuant to resolution of this Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board hereby adopts the Property Tax Exemptions Phase Out Schedule and Property Tax Eligibility Chart, attached 1 :- '-' '-J hereto and referred to collectively as "Exhibit A," for purposes of establishing eligibility of a tax exemption for new or expanding businesses pursuant to Ordinance No. 92-24. 2. This Board shall provide incentives for businesses to employ St. Lucie County residents. These incentives shall be the following: a) If a business can verify after the first year of exemption that sixty percent (60%) of its full-time employees have been St. Lucie County residents for at least six (6) months prior to employment then said business shall be entitled to one additional year from the standard exemption as set forth on "Exhibit A." b) If a business can verify after the first year of exemption that eighty percent (80%) of its full-time employees have been st. Lucie County residents for at least six (6) months prior to employment then said business shall be entitled to two additional years from the standard exemption as set forth on "Exhibit A." 3. The Board shall have the discretion to modify the eligibility requirements based on other significant factors including, but not limited to, the following: a) The increase in local employment attributable to the new or expanding business; b) The unemployment and underemployment of the available local labor force and the types and wages of jobs created therein; c) The amount of capital investment p~rchased by the new or expanding business; d) The ability of the county to otherwise meet its total fiscal needs should the requested exemption be granted; e) The cost of any increased local government services, including but not limited to roads, water, sewer, gas and law enforcement, and other direct expenditures associated with that specific business. 2 o :::0 tJ: o o ;:.; o en ¡..J w '1j :t> C) t'f] o W lJ1 en '-' -wi After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Jim Minix AYE Vice Chairman Jack Krieger AYE Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner AYE Commissioner Havert L. Fenn AYE Commissioner Judy Culpepper AYE PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 1992. ATTEST: . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI~~ONERS' ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FL~~IDÄ ,. ct Ch:~ '/ Láu~~Y;;Q~ D.....u.i'-w..;:l tCl' "JQ' ~ ..'7..:.::"....~-'" .~ ,p <.." Ö-.,,. ""_~ ..... '~., '\ t1§r/~~;,~~~~~r~:~ \~ti\} .1 ...- , ,. .... . "1 ~~;'~:l:1;i By: :,..~ . . j ,¡! :]. "-, .... I' , APPROVED AS TO FORM AND ' CO~CTNESS: () : .J -!;J4;/fIJ· /'r¡v.ll7<c ¡:-r /1./../(.£. ; 1/ ' , County Attorn~y / // /' ......... 3 o ~ tJ: o o ~ o CO ~ Lù "'C :> CJ tr1 o Lù Ú1 I!) '-' ...,; PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION ELIGIBILITY ELIGIBILITY (number of years) NUMBER OF STANDARD 60% SLC 80% SLC EMPLOYEES EXEMPTION RESIDENTS RESIDENTS 10 - 24 5· 6 7 25 - 49 6 7 8 50 - 99 7 8 9 100 - 199 8 9 10 200 + (DISCRETION OF COMMISSION) L~ss than five (5) years is left to the discretion of the Board. "EXHIBIT A" o :::0 tø o o ~ o OJ ~ W '" ;Þ C) rx:I o W D' o ~ ...tI ORDINANCE NO. 00-22 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE COUNTY ; ESTABLISHING AN EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAXATION FOR BEE ELECTRONICS, INC., 7440 COMMERCIAL CIRCLE, FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA, A NEW BUSINESS; PROVIDING THE AMOUNT OF REVENUE AVAILABLE FROM AD VALOREM TAX SOURCES FOR THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR AND THE AMOUNT OF ESTIMATED REVENUE FROM THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR WHICH WOULD BE LOST BECAUSE OF THE EXEMPTION GRANTED TO BEE ELECTRONICS, INC. ; PROVIDING AN EXPIRATION DATE OF THE EXEMPTION FROM THE DATE ON BOARD ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A FINDING THAT BEE ELECTRONICS, INC. MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A NEW BUSINESS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA: ARTICLE I Short Title This Ordinance shall be known as County Ordinance No. 00-22 "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption - Bee Electronics, Inc. ARTICLE II Procedure After consideration of the report of the Property Appraiser and in accordance with the procedure set forth in County Ordinance 92-24, "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Regulations of St. Lucie County, Florida", the Board grants and establishes an 'w ...." exemption from ad valorem taxation of the assessed value of Bee Electronics, Inc., 7440 Commercial Circle, Fort Pierce, Florida, in accordance with the following exemption phase out schedule: Year 1 (Fiscal Year 2000-01) Vear 2 Vear 3 Vear 4 Vear 5 Vear 6 Vear 7 Vear 8 Vear 9 Vear 10 100 'Yo 90% 80 'Yo 70 'Yo 60 'Yo 50 'Yo 40 'Yo 30 'Yo 20 'Yo 10 'Yo No exemption shall be granted on the land on which improvements are made by Bee Electronics, Inc. ARTICLE III Ad Valorem Tax Revenues Total revenues are available to the County for the current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources is $73,330,031.98. Revenues lost to the County for the current fiscal year by ad valorem tax exemptions under this section currently in effect are $44,608.19. Revenues to be lost by granting of this exemption for the current fiscal year are estimated to be $12,381.77. '-' ....., ARTICLE IV Expiration Date The Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption granted to Bee Electronics, Inc., a new business shall be for ten (10) years from the date of Board adoption of this Ordinance. ARTICLE V Finding The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, finds that Bee Electronics, Inc. is a new business as defined by St. Lucie County Ordinance No. 92-24 and Section 196.012(16), Florida Statutes. The Board reserves the right to repeal the exemption if Bee Electronics, Inc. no longer satisfies the criteria set out above. ARTICLE VI Severability If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason found void, invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, independent, and severable provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. '-' ...., ARTICLE VII Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect upon receipt of notice of filing from the Secretary of State. ARTICLE VIII Adoption After motion and second, the vote on this Ordinance was as follows: Chairman John D. Bruhn XX Vice Chairman Frannie Hutchinson XX Commissioner Doug Coward XX Commissioner Paula Lewis XX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this _ day of ,2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney ST. LUCIE r'"'UNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COl'¡1'l\1ISSIONERS ECONOMIC DEVEL~ENT AD VALOREM TAX EXE~TION APPLICATION Ordinance No. 92-24, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances, Chapter 196, Florida Statutes To be filed with the Board of County CommissionersofSt. Lucie County, Florida, no later than March I of the year the exemption is desired to take effect. Please attach additional information, if necessary or requested. 1. Business Name and Mailing Address: 3-~e.... S\e<:.-+c-o,,;c..S :ene... . '11-\ ~ 0 Lø '('r.~C- u a..L Gi- c u F*. ?~~c-c.L-. rL '34-'151- Lot II , 2. Please give name and telephone number of Owner or Person in Charge of this business: Name: C~I"'\+h:"'- 't-\.. \-lO-.l~(-cw.d(J Telephone Number: 5<.01- L-t<.:.8· 141' \ 3. Exact Location (Legal Description and Street Address) of Property for which this return IS filed: KI~~s ~u.;J TA,....\..I·Ç+r¡'cJ PD-r~~? ,t3loc~A L..rn(, 2~ ~o , '-\ 40 Cø IV\ rY\ e.,-c -' éLl C-I. r L.1.e 4. Date you.began, or will begin, business at this facility: D ~.C <2-rv--. h.Lr- I c:¡ q g 5. a. Description of the improvements to real property for which this exemption is requested: t.e. '5 I C> 0 ('\ OS\; u.a...n2..... ç I.>l> + (..... . ~ ,lei \ 1"\ S ~....~ .c, t r LL r-tz. ,,J Lc h r L-h.. I 1'\ c:..Lu. d2- " c' F r; L..e- (\..Y'-"'\ I'"¥'\o..n.ll ÇC\.c.:L Å.. r ì r. 5 a.....(" ~ .n.. Date of commencement of construction of improvements.: MrLrc:.....k \ ~ ~ q b. 6. a. Description of the tangible personal property for which this exemption is requested and date when property was, or is to be, purchased: Taxpayer's APPRAISER'S Estimate Taxpayer's USE Date of Estimate of ONLY of Original Condition Fair Market Class ofItem Age Purchase Cost Good A vg. Poor Value Condition ~ " } G ~ (]¡'Á ,"'/ t' i. ~ ,,/ /"" - 1 '-' "WI b. Average Value ofInventory on hand: <:it) DoG , c. Any additional personal property not listed above for which an exemption is claimed must be returned on fonn DR-405 (Tangible Personal Property Tax Return) and a copy attached to this fonn. 7. Do you desire exemption as a: -L "New Business" or as an _ "Expansion of an Existing Business" 8. Describe the Type or Nature of Your Business: M.O-r\LLFc..c..L-r« ce...... ð r 0ac~c.., +vy- +~ l:0ì Î~u... ':is ; ('\du sf rj . 9. Trade Level (Check as many as apply): Wholesale _ Manufacturing-----2L Service Office Other Professional 10. a. Number of full-time employees to be employed in St. Lucie County, Florida /2.5 b. If an expansion of an existing business: (1) Net increase in Employment AJ A· (2) Increase in productive output resulting from this expansion ¡U M . 11. Sales factor for the facility requesting exemption: Total sales in Florida from this facility-One (1) location only Total sales everywhere from this facility-One (1) location only k-~· .A.J. 1-), divided by = /lJ,A~ 12. For office space owned and used by a corporation newly domiciled in Florida: a. Date of incorporation in Florida: /lJ ,q, b. Number of Full-time employees at this location: /U,¡:¡. 13. If requesting an exemption due to location in a slum or blighted area, please furnish such' additional infonnation as required by the Board of County Commission or Property Appraiser. 2 '-' """" I hereby request the adoption of an ordinance granting an exemption from ad valorem taxation on the above property pursuant to Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes as incorporated by Ordinance No. 92-24, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances. I agree to furnish such other reasonable infonnation as the Board of County Commissioners or the Property Appraiser may request in regard to the exemption requested herein. I hereby certify that the infonnation and valuation stated above by me is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. (If prepared by someone other than the taxpayer, his declaration is based on all infonnation of which he has any knowledge.) DATE: 'f "D.:,-e -k. I. 20 CJ 0 SIGNED: ~+~, " rr- Yìj<L< <ð~ck, ) 15 E E é L t r 1 Jé 0 /'I I (.5 / /Ire. (Preparer) SIGNED: ,7$ ~~¿ß /4 ¡!;./Y T "l44 0 Cc~""-Q..,cLÒ..l C-~....,,--,--<- ì-+ e.<L''-<1- . ~ (Preparer's Address) TITLE: S lo \ - '-\ Lc ~~. c Lt c '( (Preparer's Telephone Number) PROPERTY APPRAISER'S USE ONLY 1. Total revenue available to the county or municipality for the current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources: $73,330,031.98 2. Revenue lost to the county or municipality for the current fiscal year by virtue of exemptions previously granted under this section: $44,608. 19 3. Estimate of the revenue which would be lost to the county or municipality during the current fiscal year if the exemption applied for were granted had the property for which the exemption is requested otherwise been subjectto taxation: $12, 381. 77 4. Estimate of the taxable value lost to the county if the exemption applied for were granted: $1,399,750. 5. Estimated number of S1. Lucie County residents to be employed in county: Improvements to real property $1,205,300 Personal Property $194,450 6. I have determined that the property listed above meets the definition, as defined by Section 196.0 12( 15) or (16), Florida Statutes, as incorporated by Ord. No. 92-24, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances as a New Business xx , as Expansion of an Existing business , or Neither 7. Last year for which exemption may be applied: 2010 DATE: 5-26-2000 SIGNED: RETURN TO BE FILED NOT LATER THAN MARCH 1 '" ~ i3Ee: ELECT~ONICS, INC. 'FIXED ASSETS SCHEDULE FURNITURE & FIXTURES 31-Dec-99 PURCHASE DATE VENDOR --------- ------------------- -------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------- --------- ------------------- ---- ---------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------- =================== QTY. DESCRIPTION ESTIMATE OF AGE CONDITION COST (IN MONTHS) GOOD AVG POOR FMV 06/27/95 Office Max 08/11/96 Creel 08/14/96 Goodwill Industries 08/14/96 Goodwill Industries 08/19/96 Midwest Time Recorder 18-Aug-99 ABSOLUTE ALARM 01-Sep-99 COMPUTER TELECOM 11-Nov-99 OPS 01-Dec-99 R.K. DAVIS 01-Dec-99 R.K. DAVIS 01-Dec-99 R.K. DAVIS 01-Dec-99 R.K. DAVIS TOTALS FOR FURNITURE & FIXTURES: ...". >.,J Trf. from Chicago - Sharp Fax 509 55 Disposed of 0 Work table 211 41 x 25 3 Used file cabinets 48 41 2 Disposed of X 0 2 Used desks 248 41 Disposed of 0 Time Clock 958 41 x 100 ALARM SYSTEM 16,190 1 x 11,500 TELEPHONE SYSTEM 31,242 1 x 22,000 VARIOUS FURNITURE & FIXTURES 42,371 1 x 30,000 CARPETING 30,764 1 x 20,000 CABINETS 6,611 1 x 4,000 PARTITIONS 6,898 1 x 5,500 HAND DRYERS 1.000 1 x 850 137,049 93,975 BEE ELECTRONICS 'FIXED ASSETS SCHEDULE ~ ....., TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 31-Dec-99 ESTIMATE OF G/L MONTHS CONDITION FMV DATE VENDOR QTY. DESCRIPTION COST TO DATE GOOD AVG POOR --------- ------------------- -------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ------------------- --------- ------------------- -------------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------- ------------------- 30-Jul-96 Sewing Machine Ex. 2 Brother B791-915 FL 6,588 42 x 300 21-Aug-96 Sewing Machine Ex. Brother LS3-C51-05B FL 4,300 41 x 2,000 15-Aug-96 Michael Simard Ltd. Traveling head M12392 FL 13,289 41 x 6,000 30-Sep-96 Eastem Woolen Co. 2 Brother B791-915 Complete FL 6,060 40 x 3,000 30-Sep-96 Eastem Woolen Co. Brother Ls3-C51-05B Complete FL 4,300 40 x 2,000 31-0ct-96 Eastem Woolen Co. Brother tape feeder FL 3,017 39 x 900 22-Nov-96 Eastem Woolen Co. Brother BAS-341 Stitch w/o program - 28,831 38 x 15,000 08-Apr-97 Eastern Woolen Co. Brother BAS-341 w/table & motor 28,984 33 x 15,000 10-Apr-97 Eastern Woolen Co. 3 Brother B791-415 10,064 33 x 4,500 25-Apr-97 Michael Simard Ltd. Oil Dynamic press 13,994 33 x 7,000 23-May-97 Eastem Woolen Co. Brother BAS-341 w/table & motor 27,898 32 x 15,000 29-May-97 Eastem Woolen Co. Brother BAS-341 w/table & motor 27,898 32 x 15,000 23-May-97 Eastem Woolen Co. 7 Brother B791-415 22,678 32 x 10,500 10-Jul-97 Michael Simard Ltd. 1 Comelz Skiver #2309138 6,603 30 x 3,000 28-Aug-97 Collins & Co. GR/112-635 Pro Gun Washer 1,722 29 x 500 02-Sep-97 Inter. Industrial Product C PP-24 Pad Planer #970626 5,858 28 x 2,500 08-Sep-97 Kensol Hot Stamp Press #KF500A 7,082 28 x 3,500 19-Nov-97 Eastem Woolen Co. Brother BAS-341 w/table & motor 27,898 26 x 16,000 19-Jan-98 EWC. 3 BROTHER B791-415 COMPL.ETE 9,150 24 x 4,500 19-Feb-98 E.WC. BAS 341 w/program 25,695 23 x 16,000 18-0ct-99 Allpoints Equip Co 3 Conveyors & magnetic starter 14,605 1 x 10,500 19-0ct-99 Lee Patterson Co. Spray booth system 19,668 1 x 15,000 01-Dec-99 R.K. Davis Spray booth curbs 1.846 1 x 1,000 TOTALS FOR TOOLS & EQUIPMENT 318,026 168,700 8EE EL':::TRONICS '\=\XED ASSETS SCHEDULE COMPUTER EQUIPMENT 31-Dec-99 '-' 'wi --------- ------------------- -------------------------------- ---------- ---------- --- ---- --- --------- ------------------- ---- ---------------------------- ---------- ---------- --- ---- --- =================== G/L DATE VENDOR QTY. DESCRIPTION COST ESTIMATE OF MONTHS CONDITION TO DATE GOOD AVG POOR FMV 18-Jun-99 COMPUTER ACCT CONSULT AN MAS 90 SOFTWARE 23,557 7 x 18,000 26-Jun-99 CADD Auto Cadd Software 2,751 7 x 2,000 26-Jun-99 Technology Partners Various Computers & File Server 40,131 7 x 30,000 21-Sep-99 Technology Partners Printer 302 4 x 200 12-Nov-99 Technology Partners Various Computers & Printers 41.027 1 x 32,000 TOTALS FOR COMPUTER EQUIPMENT: 107,767 82,200 GRAND TOTALS: 562,842 344,875 - ~ ""AGENDA REQUEST ITE~NO. f5f!J DATE: July 18, 2000 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application - Centaur Manufacturing - Ordinance No. 00-23 BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS A V AILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMEND A TION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Ordinance No. 00-23 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: PC] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: D glas Anderson ounty Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 '-' -...I INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 00-1008 DATE: July 6, 2000 SUBJECT: 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application - Centaur Manufacturing ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: On October 6,1992, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 92-24 establishing a program to exempt certain new and expanding businesses from ad valorem taxation as allowed by state law, a copy of which is attached. The ordinance was adopted subject to a referendum held on November 3, 1992 which passed. Also attached is a copy of Resolution No. 92-264 adopted on October 20, 1992 establishing a property tax exemption phase out schedule and a property tax exemption eligibility rate schedule for new or expanding businesses. Attached is an application filed by Centaur Manufacturing. As required by state law, the application was forwarded to the St. Lucie County Property Appraiser for review. The comments and findings of the Property Appraiser contained in the application. As the memorandum states, Centaur Manufacturing submitted the required information and met the statutory definition of a new business. The Property Appraiser's estimate of the taxable value lost to the County if the exemption is granted is $1,474,960. The Property Appraiser's estimate of revenue which would '-" """'" be lost to the County during the current fiscal year if the exemption were granted is $13,047.15. The application reflects 25 St. Lucie County residents to be employed by Centaur Manufacturing. Under the property tax eligibility chart, it appears that Centaur Manufacturing would receive a eight (8) year exemption, phased as follows: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 100 'Yo 90 'Yo 80% 70 'Yo 60% 50 'Yo 40% 20% O'Yo Also attached is a copy of draft Ordinance No. 00-23 which, if adopted, would grant Centaur Manufacturing an economic ad valorem tax exemption for a period of eight (8) years. Permission to advertise was granted on June 27, 2000. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Ordinance No. 00-23 as drafted. Respectfully submitted, DSM/ caf Attachments \ð s .' '-' .." ORDINANCE NO. 92-24 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1-19.3 (TAXATION) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY CREATING ARTICLE V (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTIONS) RELATING TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE COUNTY; ESTABLISHING AN EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAXATION FOR CERTAIN NEW AND EXPANDING BUSINESS PROPERTIES; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING PROCEDURES FOR APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION; SPECIFYING DUTIES OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER IN CONNECTION· WITH SUCH PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY; FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; EFFECTIVE DATE; ADOPTION; AND CODIFICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes, provides the Board of County Commissioners may hold a referendum granting Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions under Section 3, Article VII of the State Constitution. 2. This Board believes that amending Chapter 1-19.3 (Taxation) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, by creating Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions for a. new or expanding business is in the best interest of the health I safety and public welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County I Florida: btrucJc through. passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 1 ::t:I'T ~ CD ~·o C1~:Þ o CD ::3 11 ::3 o..ZCD CD~ 0.. ::z:: .. 0 CD~ o~æ ~ :;3 I ... ~~() I ~,~ 1.0 1\1 CD UJN~ 010 ~~H1 "Mrt (JIw::r ~O\CD :Þ () . ~. 3: 11 C1 o¡:: ::t:I r-. rt IJj o() 00 ~¡:: 11 rt 01 (DC/) N:r Wr-< ¡:: C1 r-' "0 CD :Þ G)() [%]0 ¡:: ::3 N~ 0\ o o '-' ~ PART A. AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 1-19.3 (TAXATION) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Chapter 1-19.3 (Taxation) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, is hereby amended by creating Article V (Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions) to read as follows: Chapter 1-19.3 TAXATION ARTICLE V. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTIONS Section 1-19.3-51. Short Title. This Ordinance shall be known as County Ordinance No. 92-24, "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Requlations of St. Lucie County, Florida." Section 1-19.3-52. . Enactment and Authoritv. Pursuant to Section 3, Article VII of the State Constitution and in accordance with Chapters 125, 163, 192, 196 and 214, Florida Statutes and Florida Department of Revenue Rules, Chapter 12D-7, Florida Administrative Code, incorporated municipalities and counties individual Iv or In combination are authorized and empowered to adopt, amend or revise and enforce an ordinance relatinG to economic development ad valorem tax exemptions, after the electors of such municipality or county, votinq on the question In a referendum, authorize the adoption of such ordinance. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 2 o ::t1 OJ o o ;;¡;; o OJ N W '"ó :Þ ø [r N 0\ o ¡.J ,-",. 'WI -Section 1-19.3-53. Jurisdiction. The area subiect to this Ordinance shall be incorporated and unincorporated St. Lucie County. Section 1-19.3-54. Purpose and Intent. The public health, safety, comfort, economy, order, convenience and qeneral welfare require the harmonious, orderly and ro -ressive develo ment of new business and ex ansion of existin business within Florida and its incorporated municipalities and counties. In furtherance of this qeneral purpose counties by Chapters 125, 163, 192, 196 and 214, Florida Statutes and Florida Department of Revenue Rules, Chapter 12D-7, Florida Administrative Code, are authorized and empowered to adopt, amend or revise and enforce measures relatinq to economic development ad valorem tax exem tions for new business and ex ansion of existin business. It is the intent- of this Ordinance to secure or to ensure: ~ The establishment of criteria for qrantinq such exemptions to certain types of businesses or industries or for denyinq exemptions on a rational, nonarbitrary, nondiscriminatory basis by the Board of County Commissioners. ~ No precedent shall be implied or inferred by the qranting of an exemption to a new or expandinq business. Applications for exemptions shall be considered bv the Board of Count v Commissioners on a case-by-case basis for each application, after consideration of the Property Appraiser's report on that application. l:. Any exemption qranted shall apply UP to one hundred percent (100%) of the assessed value of all improvements to real property made by or for the use of a new business and all tanqible personal property of such new business, or up to one hundred percent (100%) of the assessed value of all added improvements to real property which additions are made to facilitate the expansion of an Struc]c through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 3 o :u l1 o o :,;: o OJ N W ~ :Þ G) tI1 N 0\ o N '-" "'-tI h Any exemption shall be UP to a full ten (10) year period from the time the exemption is qranted. ~ No exemption shall be qranted on the land which new or expanded businesses are to be located. .L. No exemption shall be qranted on school or water manaqement district taxes, or on taxes levied for payment of bonds or taxes authorized a vote of the electors of the County pursuant to Sections 9 or 12, Article VII, of the State Constitution. Section 1-19.3-55. Definition of Terms. The followinq words, phrases and terms shall have the same ~ meaninqs attributed to them in current Florida Statutes and the Florida Administrative Code, except where the context clearly indicates otherwise: 1..:.. Applicant - Any person or corporation submittinq an Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption application to the Board. ~ Board - The St. Lucie County Board of Commissioners. b. Business Any activity enqaqed in by any person, corporation or company with the obiect of private or public qa~n , benef it, or advantaqe , either direct or indirect. 3.1 New Business - h A business establishinq 10 or more iobs to employ 10 or more full-time employees in this County, which manufactures, processes, Struc]c through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 4 o ::c OJ o o ::¡;; o Q) N W "ú :Þ G) [t] tv 0\ o W '-" '.I compounds, fabricates, or produces for sale items of tanqible personal property at a fixed location and which comprises an industrial or manufacturinq plant; lh. A business establishinq 25 or more iobs to employ 25 or more full-time employees in this County, the sales factor of which, as defined . by s. 220.15 (5), Florida Statutes, for the facility with respect to which it requests an economic development .ad valorem tax exemption is less than '0.50 for each year the exarnption ~s claimed. No business enqaqed in retail operations as defined herein shall be eliqible for an exemption pursuant to this subsection b; or ~ An office space in this state owned and used by a corporation newly domiciled in this County; provided such office space houses 50 or full-time such employees of more corporation: provided that such business or office .first beqins operation on a site clearly separate from any other commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. StruoJc through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 5 o :J: Có o o ,;; o Q) N W "'0 :Þ G) [Ij N 0\ o ~ 3.2 '-' ....J fl:. Any business located in an area desiqnated enterprise zone that first beqins operation on a site clearly separate from any other commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. Expansion of Existinq Business .ª-.:.. A business establishinq 10 or more iobs to employ 10 or more full-time employees in this County, which manufactures, processes, compounds, fabricates, or produces for sale items of tanqible personal property at a fixed location and which comprises an industrial or manufacturinq plant: or ~ Any business establishinq 25 or more iobs to employ 25 or more full-time employees in this County, the sales factor of which, as defined by s.220.15(5), Florida Statutes, for the facility with respect to which it requests an economic development ad valorem tax exemption is less than 0.50 for each year the exemption is claimed provided that such business increases operations on a site colocated with a commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business, resultinq in a net increase ln employment of not less than 10 percent or Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 6 o ::t1 tJ: o o ~ o Ql tv W ""0 :x:- C') rrJ tv 0\ o 01 '-' 'w1I an increase in productive output of not less than 10 percent. No business enqaqed ~n retail operations as defined herein shall be eliqible for an exemption pursuant to this subsection b. £..:.. An business located in an enter rise zone that increases operations on a site colocated with a commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. 3.3 Business enqaqed in retail operations _ a business en a ed in a sale to a consumer or to an e~son of an item of tanqible personal property for any purposes other than for resale. ~ De artment - The Florida De artment of Revenue. ~ Im rovements - Ph sical chan es made to raw land and structures placed on or under the land surface. All personal property acquired to an facilitate ex ansion of an existin business rovided that the ersonal is added or increased on or after the day the ordinance is adopted. However, personal uired to re lace existin shall not be considered to facilitate businesses a expansion. ~ Sales Factor - A fraction the numerator of which is the total sales of the taxpayer in this state durinq the £trucJc through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 7 o ::u tI:I o o ::..; o Q) tv W '" :Þ G1 [t] tv 0\ o 0\ '-' ..,,¡ taxable ear or eriod and the denominator of which is the total sales of the taxpayer everywhere durinq the taxable eriod. See Section 220.15 5 Florida Statutes for specifics of computation). Section 1-19.3-56. General. The Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption is a local o tion tax incentive for new or business which ma be ranted or refused at the sole discretion of the Board. To a I for such an exem tion a business locatin in the cor orated or unincor orated area of St". Lucie Count must file an a lication Florida De artment of Revenue Form DR-418-. - See Attachment 1) with the Board. Satisfactory proof that the business meets the criteria for exem tion as a new business or ex ansion of an existin business as defined b this Ordinance must Ii cation. The Application shall be filed on or before 1 March of the year in which an exemption is requested. Exem tion from Count ranted b the Board. The exemption qranted under this Ordinance shall not accrue to im rovements to real made b or for the use of new or ex businesses when such im rovements have been included on the tax rolls rior to the referendum authorizin this Ordinance. Section 1-19.3-57. Procedure. to Before the Board acts on an application, it must be submitted raiser for review. After careful consideration 8trucJe through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 8 o ::ö tJ: o o ~ o Q) tv W "t! :Þ C) [I1 tv '" o ~ :".i:'; : '-' 'will the raiser shall re ort to the Board concernin the fiscal impact of qrantinq exemptions. The raiser's Re ort shall include the followin : h The total revenue available to the County for the current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources. L.. The amount of revenue fore one b the Count for the current fiscal ear because of economic develo ment ad valorem tax exemptions previously qranted. .h. An estimate of the amount of revenue which would be fore one for the current fiscal year if the exem tion is qranted to the new or expandinq business. L. the After consideration of th.e report of the Property Appraiser, Board ma choose to ado t an Ordinance the tax exem tion to a business. The Ordinance shall be ado ted in the same manner as an other ordinance of the Count . The Ordinance shall include the followinq information~ h The name and address of the new or expandinq business. L.. The amount of revenue available from ad valorem tax sources for the current fiscal ear revenue fore one for the current fiscal ear because of economic develo ment ad valorem tax exem tions currentl in effect and the amount of estimated revenue which '..:ould be foreaone because of the eXem tion ranted to th~ new or ex andin business. .h. The ex iration date of the exem tion. U to from date of Board ado tion of the Ordinance exemption) L. A findin that the business meets the definition of a new business or an expansion of an existinq business. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 9 o ~ CI:J o o ~ o Q) N W 'i1 :Þ C) Ctj N 0'\ o Q) '-' .....I ~ The Board 's business no exemption. authority to revoke an exemption if the lonGer satisfies the criteria for the Section 1-19.3-58. Fees. Fees charGed to offset the cost of processinG the Economic Develo rnent Ad Valorem Tax lication or an Ordinance shall be adopted by the Board by resolution. Section 1-19.3-59. E1iqible Business or Industrv. Anv business or industry, as defined in Section 1-19.3-55, 3.2 that does not as an ineli ible business or industry as defined in Section 1-19.3-60. When considerinq the issue of whether or not a busiQess or industry is an eliqible business as defined herein, the Board shall consider the anticipated number of employees, averaqe waqe, type of industr or business environmental im acts volume of business or roduction or an other information relatin to the issue of whether the proposed development would siqnificantly improve economic development in St. Lucie County prior to acceptinq the Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Application. The criteria for determininq the lenqth of an exemption and the e amount of an exem be forrnulate"d b the Board b resolution. The criteria shall provide for incentives for businesses that employ St. Lucie County residents who establish permanent domicile pursuant to Florida Statutes. Struok through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 10 o ::0 O::! o o :;.;: o CD tv W "tJ :Þ ø trI tv 0\ o \D '-' 'wi . Section 1-19.3-60. Ineliqible Business or Industry. Any business or industry in violation of any federal, state, or local law or requlation qoverninq environmental matters such as air, water, and noise pollution. Section 1-19.3-61. Appeals. The decision of the Board not to qrant an Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption to a particular business or industry is sub;ect only to ;udicial review pursuant to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. . Section 1-19.3-62 - 1-19.3-70. Reserved. PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, and adopted prior to January 1, 1969, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY. If any p·ortion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 11 o ::t! to o o ;¡;: o ()) N W "'0 ;Þ ø rrJ N 0\ -1 o '-' ....I PART D. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304. PART E. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect only upon approval by the voters on November 3, 1992 of the ballot question authorized by the Board in Resolution No. 92-175. PART F. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Jim Minix AYE Vice Chairman Jack Krieger AYE Commissioner Judy Culpepper AYE Commissioner Havert L. Fenn AYE Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner AYE PART G. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County,' Florida, and the word" "ordinanç::e" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that parts B to G shall not be codified. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 12 o ~ OJ o o " o Q) N W 'ì: :Þ ø [tj N 0\ f-l f-l '-' 'wi PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 6th day of October, 1992. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISS IONERSI~ .' ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA· :: ,. r' ~., ..... . ..;\ ~ ... ' . ":. . . . . . 1 CHAIRMAN . .. 'j \..;., .v . .\. ':.' J .. :".". l~ - # Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 13 o ::0 [Jj o o :::-: " ., o Q) N W "'d :x:- C) rr1 N 0\ ~ N · . ~ oJ Douglas Dixon, Î-~rk of the Circuit Court - ·t. Lucie County Fi le Number: 1 \...(11 7 1 7 OR BOOK 0......113 PAGE 0 3 5 7 Recorded: 10-27-92 02:43 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 92-264 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION PHASE OUT SCHEDULE AND PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION ELIGIBILITY RATE SCHEDULE FOR NEW OR EXPANDING BUSINESS APPLYING FOR AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 92-24 WHEREAS, the Board of County commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. On September 8, 1992, this Board adopted Resolution 92- 175 which implemented. the provisions of section 196.1995, Florida Statutes which authorized the Board of County commissioners the authority to call a referendum on the issue of granting a local Option Economic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption. 2. On October 6, 1992, this Board adopted Ordinance No. 92- 24, which amended Chapter 1-19.3 (TAXATION) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, by creating Article V - Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption. Enactment of Ordinance No. 92-24 is contingent on a majority vote in the November referendum election. 3. Se~tion 1-19.3-59 (Eligibility Business or Industry) of Ordinance No. 92-24 provides for the formulation of. criteria for determining the length of an exemption and the percentage amount of an exemption pursuant to resolution of this Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board hereby adopts the Property Tax Exemptions Phase Out Schedule and Property Tax Eligibility Chart, attached 1 - '-" ....,¡ hereto and referred to collectively as "Exhibit A," for purposes of establishing eligibility of a tax exemption for new or expanding businesses pursuant to Ordinance No. 92-24. 2. This Board shall provide incentives for businesses to employ st. Lucie County residents. These incentives shall be the following: a) If a business can verify after the first year of exemption that sixty percent (60%) of its full-time employees have been st. Lucie County residents for at least six (6) months prior to employment then said business shall be entitled to one additional year from the standard exemption as set forth on "Exhibit A." b) If a business can verify after the first year of exemption that eighty percent (80%) of its full-time employees have been St. Lucie County residents for at least six (6) months prior to employment then said business shall be entitled to two additional years from the standard exemption as set forth on "Exhibit A." 3. The Board shall have the discretion to modify the eligibility requirements based on other significant factors including, but not limited to, the following: a) The increase in local employment attributable to the new or expanding business; b) The unemployment and underemployment of the available local labor force and the types and wages of jobs created therein; c) The amount of capital investment purchased by the new or expanding business; d) The ability of the county to otherwise meet its total fiscal needs should the requested exemption be granted; e) The cost of any increased local government services, including but not limited to roads, water, sewer, gas and law enforcement, and -other direct expenditures associated with that specific business. 2 o :::0 C' o o ^ o CD -I Lù 'i; :Þ C) trI o Lù (;1 CD '-" "wi! After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Jim Minix AYE o :;t iJj o o ^ vice Chairman Jack Krieger AYE Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner AYE Commissioner Havert L. Fenn AYE o CO ~ W Commissioner Judy Culpepper AYE PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 1992. - .~ :Þ C) [%1 YÆM-~~~~ Det1'týl !.Cl" ".~, if 'ö- ......~"....~,"'I.~ (':" .L ...Ý' ;:""";'~ ...........'"¡ '¡J. .... .... ~ . '.'. " ..' .~ :..~" ~ l 1) ~ \ ".,:.. ., J~-~ -; I 17=.'·· ".::'- . ..~,. ~~ ~"..;) ¡ i{.... -~-...;.;-:~ ~:'~;~ ~::,,~;a~f~~\/fj "-\;,'" l../r. ,"'",..0\"';...... ~:;;- .~:::.~~~~~~I:~~--:;.-;.~ . By: . . '. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI~I:ÐNERS' ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLqRIDÄ . .. 9= ... -~ . Chairman"" !y '/. o W Ln \0 ATTEST: ....... oJ ..1 J. ;<1: "~i APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: 0 I )W/fYJ· /": l _ { 'utì / '. rf[;\17< I . 1/\1- v County Attorz;-ey / ..- / ./ 3 '-' '-' PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION ELIGIBILITY ELIGIBILITY (number of years) NUMBER OF STANDARD 60% SLC 80% SLC EMPLOYEES EXEMPTION RESIDENTS RESIDENTS 10 - 24 5· 6 7 25 - 49 6 7 8 50 - 99 7 8 9 100 - 199 8 9 10 200 + (DISCRETION OF COMMISSION) L~ss than five (5) years is left to the discretion of the Board. "EXHIBIT A" o '" t::J o o ^ o (X) ~ W "C > C1 ['<1 o W Q\ o Fèb 07 00 04:24p St. Lucie Count~ Florida 4621581 p.2 ST. LlfC~COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY CO~USSIONERS ECONOMIC DEVELOI>MENT AI) VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION Ordinance No. 92-24. S1. Lucie County Code of Ordinances, Chapter 196, Florida Statutes To be filed with the Board of County CommissionersofSt. Lucie County, Florida, no later than March I of the year the exemption is desired to take effect. Please attach additional infonnation, if necessary or requested. General Contracting (USA) Co. LTD 1. Business Name and Mailing Address: d/b/a Centaur Manufacturin~ 5520 Glades Cut-off Road Ft. Pierce, FL 34981 2. Please give name and telephone number of Owner or Person in Charge of this business: Name: James Henderson Telephone Number: 407/583-7007 3. Exact Location (Legal Description and Street Address) of Property for which this return is filed: 31 35 40 FRoM INT WLY R/W CANAL #99 & NWLY R/W GLADES CUT-oFF RD RUN 5 44 DEG 56 MIN 07 SEC W ALGSD RD R/W 2589.04 FT FOR 4. Date you began, or will begin, business at this facility: April 1, 2000 5. a. Description of the improvements to real property for which this exemption is requested: r-- b. Date of commencement of construction of improvements: April 22, 1998 " 6. a. Description of the tangible personal property for which this exemption is requested and date when \ property was, or is to be, purchased: \.. 1.-..-- --./ Taxpayer's APPRAISER'S Estimate .. Taxpayer's USE Date of Estimate of ONLY of Original Condition Fair Market Class of Item Age Purchase Cost GootI Avg. Poor Value Condition Please See Attached Feb 07 00 04:24p St. Lucie Count~ Florida 4621581 p.3 ~ ..., b. Average Value ofInventory on hand: c. Any additional personal property not listed above for which an exemption is claimed must be returned on form DR-405 (Tangible Personal Property Tax Return) and a copy attached to this form. 7. Do you desire exemption as a: ~ "New Business" or as an _ "Expansion of an Existing Business" 8. Describe the Type or Nature of Your Business: PVC Pipe Manufacturing 9. Trade Level (Check as many as apply): Wholesale _ Manufacturing~ Service Office Other Professional 10. a. Number of full-time employees to be employed in S1. Lucie County, Florida 25 b. If an expansion of an existing business: (1) Net increase in Employment (2) Increase in producti ve output resulting from this expansion 11. Sales factor for the facility requesting exemption: New business-not yet in production Total sales in Florida from this facility-One (1) location only divided by Total sales everywhere from this facility-One (1) location only = 12. For office space owned and used by a corporation newly domiciled in Florida: a. Date of incorporation in Florida: 12/3/97 b. Number of ¡'ull-time employees at this location: 4 13. If requesting an exemption due to location in a slum or blighted area, please furnish such additional information as required by the Board of County Commission or Property Appraiser. 2 Fèb 07 00 04:25p St. Lucie Count~ Florida 4621581 p.4 '-" ....., I hereby request the adoption of an ordinance granting an exemption from ad valorem taxation on the above property pursuant to Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes as incorporated by Ordinance No. 92-24, 81. Lucie County Code of Ordinances. I agree to furnish such other reasonable infonnation as the Board of County Commissioners or the Property Appraiser may request in regard to the exemption requested herein. I hereby certify that the infonnation and valuation stated above by me is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. (If prepared by someone other than the taxpayer, his declaration is based on all infonnation of which he has any knowledge.) DATE: SIGNED:~ /17. ~ (preparer) 6827 N. Orange Blossom Trail, Ste. 2 SIGNED: Orlando, FL 32810 (preparer's Address) TITLE: 407/583-7007 (Preparer's Telephone Number) PROPERTY APPRAISER'S USE ONLY I. Total revenue available to the county or municipality for the current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources: $73,330,031. 98 2. Revenue lost to the county or municipality for the current fiscal year by virtue of exemptions previously granted under this section: $44,608. 19 3. Estimate of the revenue which would be lost to the county or municipality during thc CUlTent fiscal year if the exemption applied for were granted had the property for which the exemption is requested otherwise been subject to taxation: $13,047.05 4. Estimate of the taxable value lost to the county if the exemption applied for were granted: $1,474,960. 5. Estimated number of S1. Lucie County residents to be employed in county: Improvements to real property $241,090 Personal Property $1,233,870 6. I have detennined that the property listed above meets the definition, as defined by Section 196.0 12( 15) or (16), Florida8tatutes, as incorporated by Ord. No. 92-24,81. Lucie County Code ofOrØinances as a New Business XX , as Expansion of an Existing business , or Neither 7. Last year for which exemptionmay be applied: 2008 DATE: 5-26-2000 SIGNED: RETURN TO BE FILED NOT LATER THAN MARCH 1 3 CENTAUR MANlJ1!'ACTURING 'wi ST LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION Taxpayer's Estimate Taxpayer's Date of Estimate of of Original Condition Fair Market Class of Item Age Purchase Cost Good Avg. Poor Value Mixer Plant 2 yrs 1998 925500 x 699117 Extruder 2 yrs 1998 395262 x 279977 Chiller 2 yrs 1998 55675 x 40995 Beller 2 yrs 1998 47300 x 33504 Switchboard-480V 2 yrs 1998 33065 x 23421 Panel-480V 2 yrs 1998 8302 x 5881 Granulator 2 yrs 1998 79682 x 56774 Fire Eauipment 2 yrs 1998 610 x 432 Air Compressor 2 yrs 1998 32541 x 23050 Transformer 2 yrs 1998 1902 x 1348 Forklift 2 yrs 1998 19695 x 13951 Bolt Circle 2 yrs 1998 2929 x 2074 Printers 2 yrs 1998 32604 x 24368 Computer System 2 yrs 1998 10455 x 7623 Sign 2 yrs 1998 1611 x 1212 Electrical 2 yrs 1998 5301 x 3617 Alarm 2 yrs 1998 447 x 288 Lighting 2 yrs 1998 10494 x 7071 Compressor Roof 1 yr 1999 3600 x 2775 Piping: Pump/Strainer 1 yr 1999 14419 x 11115 Chiller: Pump/Starter 1 yr 1999 1417 x 1092 Cyclone Stand 1 yr 1999 698 x 538 Portable Storage Bins 1 yr 1999 681 x 525 Blower Coupling 1 yr 1999 200 x 154 Blower Pac Elbows 1 yr 1999 218 x 173 Gavlanized Tubing/Piping 1 yr 1999 56240 x 45888 Sump Slab 1 yr 1999 1600 x 1267 Extruder-Tooling 1 yr 1999 6488 x 5136 Beller-Ln 2 1 yr 1999 68050 x 59544 Tools 1 yr 1999 2418 x 1980 Impact Machine 1 yr 1999 1019 x 849 Pro-Rate Unit 1 yr 1999 5817 x 4847 Ln 2 Extruder (30/60) 1 yr 1999 159641 x 141903 Ln 2 Tooling (30/60) 1 yr 1999 64005 x 56894 Ln 2 Downstream (30/60) 1 yr 1999 216301 x 195239 Benches 1 yr 1999 421 x 360 Welder 1 yr 1999 365 x 311 Drill Press 1 yr 1999 499 x 427 Shelvina 1 yr 1999 1140 x 974 HODDer 1 vr 1999 807 x 689 Trash Recepticles 1 yr 1999 553 x 473 Test Weights 1 yr 1999 766 x 686 Ln 1 Tank Gasket 1 yr 1999 1363 x 1278 Ln 1 Spare Parts 1 yr 1999 2555 x 2449 Circuit Breaker 1 vr 1999 1115 x 1069 Desks 1 yr 1999 1677 x 1258 Filing Cabinets 1 yr 1999 1658 x 1313 Page 1 CENTAUR MANlJ1!'ACTURING ...., ST LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION Taxpayer's Estimate Taxpayer's Date of Estimate of of Original Condition F air Market Class of Item AQe Purchase Cost Good Avg. Poor Value Telephone System 1 yr 1999 3837 x 3038 T able/Oven/RefriQerator 1 yr 1999 1628 x 1289 Time Clock 1 yr 1999 241 x 196 Cabinet 1 yr 1999 305 x 261 Table . 1 yr 1999 121 x 103 Vacuum 1 yr 1999 172 x 147 Copier 1 yr 1999 550 x 470 Computer Equipment 1 yr 1999 7090 x 5317 Printer Accessory 1 yr 1999 1207 x 980 Computer Equip (UK) 1 yr 1999 558 x 485 Computer Workstation 1 yr 1999 280 x 239 Electrical 1 yr 1999 5487 x 4614 TOTAL: 2,300,581 1,783,044 Page 2 '-' ...., ORDINANCE NO. 00- 23 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE COUNTY; ESTABLISHING AN EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAXATION FOR CENTAUR MANUFACTURING, 5520 GLADES CUT-OFF ROAD, FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA, A NEW BUSINESS; PROVIDING THE AMOUNT OF REVENUE A V AILABLE FROM AD VALOREM TAX SOURCES FOR THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR AND THE AMOUNT OF ESTIMATED REVENUE FROM THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR WHICH WOULD BE LOST BECAUSE OF THE EXEMPTION GRANTED TO CENTAUR MANUFACTURING; PROVIDING AN EXPIRATION DATE OF THE EXEMPTION FROM THE DATE ON BOARD ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A FINDING THAT CENTAUR MANUFACTURING MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A NEW BUSINESS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA: ARTICLE I Short Title This Ordinance shall be known as County Ordinance No. 00-23 "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption - Centaur Manufacturing. - - ~ .."", ARTICLE II Procedure After consideration of the report of the Property Appraiser and in accordance with the procedure set forth in County Ordinance 92-24, "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Regulations of St. Lucie County, Florida", the Board grants and establishes an exemption from ad valorem taxation of the assessed value of Centaur Manufacturing, 5520 Glades Cut-Off Road, Fort Pierce, Florida, in accordance with the following exemption phase out schedule: Year 1 (Fiscal Year 2000-01) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 Year 9 100 'Yo 90 'Yo 80'Yo 70 'Yo 60'Yo 50 'Yo 40 'Yo 20 'Yo O'Yo No exemption shall be granted on the land on which improvements are made by Centaur Manufacturing. ARTICLE III Ad V alorem Tax Revenues Total revenues are available to the County for the current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources is $73,330,031.98. Revenues lost to the County for the current fiscal year by ad valorem tax exemptions under this section currently in effect are $44,608.19. Revenues ---- --.-. ~ ...., to be lost by granting of this exemption for the current fiscal year are estimated to be $13,047.05. ARTICLE IV Expiration Date The Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption granted to Centaur Manufacturing, a new business shall be for eight (8) years from the date of Board adoption of this Ordinance. ARTICLE V Finding The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, finds that Centaur Manufacturing, Inc. is a new business as defined by St. Lucie County Ordinance No. 92-24 and Section 196.012(16), Florida Statutes. The Board reserves the right to repeal the exemption if Centaur Manufacturing no longer satisfies the criteria set out above. ARTICLE VI Severability If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason found void, invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, independent, and severable provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. - . '-'" ....." ARTICLE VII Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect upon receipt of notice of filing from the Secretary of State. ARTICLE VIII Adoption After motion and second, the vote on this Ordinance was as follows: Chairman John D. Bruhn XX Vice Chairman Frannie Hutchinson XX Commissioner Doug Coward XX Commissioner Paula Lewis XX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this _ day of ,2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney , '-"AGENDA REQUEST 5'/1 ITEM'NO. _k:: DATE: July 18, 2000 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application - Bluewater Sport Fishing Boats, Inc. _ Ordinance No. 00-26 BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Ordinance No. 00-26 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: uglas Anderson ounty Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eft. 5/96 - .......- - '-' ...,,1 INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 00-1009 DATE: July 6, 2000 SUBJECT: 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application - Bluewater Sport Fishing Boats, Inc. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: On October 6,1992, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 92-24 establishing a program to exempt certain new and expanding businesses from ad valo~em taxation as allowed by state law, a copy of which is attached. The ordinance was adopted subject to a referendum held on November 3,1992 which passed. Also attached is a copy of Resolution No. 92-264 adopted on October 20,1992 establishing a property tax exemption phase out schedule and a property tax exemption eligibility rate schedule for new or expanding businesses. Attached is an application filed by Bluewater Sport Fishing Boats, Inc. As required by state law, the application was forwarded to the St. Lucie County Property Appraiser for review. The comments and findings of the Property Appraiser are contained in the application. As the memorandum states, Bluewater Sport Fishing Boats, Inc. submitted the required information and met the statutory definition of a new business. The Property Appraiser's estimate of the taxable value lost to the County if the exemption is granted is '-' ....,; $397,800. The Property Appraiser's estimate of revenue which would be lost to the County during the current fiscal year if the exemption were granted is $3,518.82. The application reflects 12-18 St. Lucie County residents to be employed by Bluewater Sport Fishing Boats, Inc. Under the property tax eligibility chart, it appears that Bluewater Sport Fishing Boats, Inc. would receive a. seven (7) year exemption, phased as follows: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 100% 90'}'o 80 '}'O 70'}'o 60 '}'O 40'}'o 20% OO'}'o Also attached is a copy of draft Ordinance No. 00-26 which, if adopted, would grant Bluewater Sport Fishing Boats, Inc. an economic ad valorem tax exemption for a period of seven years. Permission to advertise was granted on June 27,2000. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Ordinance No. 00-26 as drafted. DSM/ caf Attachments ~ J Douglas Dixon, Î'~rk of the Circuit Court -- 't. Lucie County Fi le Number: :v 11 7 1 7 OR BOOK c...." 1 3 PAGE 0 3 5 7 Recorded: 10-27-92 02:43 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 92-264 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION PHASE OUT SCHEDULE AND PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION ELIGIBILITY RATE SCHEDULE FOR NEW OR EXPANDING BUSINESS APPLYING FOR AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 92-24 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. On September 8, 1992, this Board adopted Resolution 92- 175 which implemented the provisions of Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes which authorized the Board of County Commissioners the authority to call a referendum on the issue of granting a local Option Economic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption. 2. On October 6, 1992, this Board adopted Ordinance No. 92- 24, which amended Chapter 1-19.3 (TAXATION) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, by creating Article V - Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption. Enactment of Ordinance No. 92-24 is contingent on a majority vote in the November referendum election. 3. Section 1-19.3-59 (Eligibility Business or Industry) of Ordinance No. 92-24 provides for the formulation of criteria for determining the length of an exemption and the percentage amount of an exemption pursuant to resolution of this Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board hereby adopts the Property Tax Exemptions Phase Out Schedule and Property Tax Eligibility Chart, attached 1 , '-" ....,¡ hereto and referred to collectively as "Exhibit A," for purposes of establishing eligibility of a tax exemption for new or expanding businesses pursuant to Ordinance No. 92-24. 2. This Board shall provide incentives for businesses to employ St. Lucie County residents. These incentives shall be the following: a) If a business can verify after the first year of exemption that sixty percent (60%) of its full-time employees have been St. Lucie County residents for at least six (6) months prior to employment then said business shall be entitled to one additional year from the standard exemption as set forth on "Exhibit A." b) If a business can verify after the first year of exemption that eighty percent (80%) of its full-time employees have been St. Lucie County residents for at least six (6) months prior to employment then said business shall be entitled to two additional years from the standard exemption as set forth on "Exhibit A.If 3. The Board shall have the discretion to modify the eligibility requirements based on other significant factors including, but not limited to, the following: a) The increase in local employment attributable to the new or expanding business; b) The unemployment and underemployment of the available local labor force and the types and wages of jobs created therein; c) The amount of capital investment purchased by the new or expanding business; d) The ability of the county to otherwise meet its total fiscal needs should the requested exemption be granted; e) The cost of any increased local government services, including but not limited to roads, water, sewer, gas and law enforcement, and other direct expenditures associated with that specific business. 2 o ::0 i:P o o :::-: o CD r' lù "0 :Þ a t'<1 o lù tJ1 CD '-" ..., After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Jim Minix AYE Vice Chairman Jack Krieger AYE Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner AYE Commissioner Havert L. Penn AYE Commissioner Judy Culpepper AYE PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 1992. ATTEST: , . . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMIS$·~ÐNERS· ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FL~RIDA . . cr Ch:~ láL4-~~~~ D~»¥ty;.~Çl~~~ , t:). .^ ,." -.'.... .-"'\ ~ (õ;-" "','" (,'.'-~~ "'~#').~ :~~:'::'-'lr?' ~·~t. .,~,.~~.~.~ ,., , I .,---. t).. \'. ";¡ .:; ,. :-',.- .'<,;;,) 9.. :f;: 4, ~!' i ¡;'!- .-'\'-.1 : ....~ ~\éit~i;~\~({.j ·1;" L:r.-..."".,,,,., V ~~::~·:.·;~~~~s:.~~· By: '/. /:. , oj .J! ') '.., ....·I¡I, . APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORR¡ECTNESS: 0 J ¡-·:VJ/ lJ· /:: /.', ,. I. .. rfL\1?\ ¿Va I. .-- If Y- County Att-orn~y / // . .--/ 3 o :::0 tJ: o o ;:>;: o CD -J W '"C :Þ o t%] o W tJ1 \0 '-' ~ PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION ELIGIBILITY ELIGIBILITY (number of years) NUMBER OF STANDARD 60% SLC 80% SLC EMPLOYEES EXEMPTION RESIDENTS RESIDENTS 10 - 24 5· 6 7 25 - 49 6 7 8 50 - 99 7 8 9 100 - 199 8 9 10 200 + (DISCRETION OF COMMISSION) . Less than five (5) years is left to the discretion of the Board. "EXHIBIT A" o :;0 tJj o o ?': o CD !oJ lù "0 ;Þ C') M o lù 0\ o ~ s '-" "'" ORDINANCE NO. 92-24 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1-19.3 (TAXATION) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY CREATING ARTICLE V (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTIONS) RELATING TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE COUNTY; ESTABLISHING AN EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAXATION FOR CERTAIN NEW AND EXPANDING BUSINESS PROPERTIES; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING PROCEDURES FOR APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION; SPECIFYING DUTIES OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER IN CONNECTION· WITH SUCH PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY; FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; EFFECTIVE DATE; ADOPTION; AND CODIFICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes, provides the Board of County Commissioners may hold a referendum granting Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions under Section 3, Article VII of the State Constitution. 2. This Board believes that amending Chapter 1-19.3 (Taxation) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, ~ by creating Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions for a new or expanding business is in the best interest of the health, safety and public welfare of the citizens of st. Lucie County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: Etruck through. passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 1 ::O~~ ro ....·0 C1......:Þ o ro ::3 t-I ::3 o..zro ID~ 0.. ::I: .. 0 (1)~ o~æ ~ ::3 I ... t;;¡.Jn IN~ \D ro wN~ 010 ~~H¡ ~())g: ~0\(1) :Þ n . ..... 3: t-I . C1 o¡:: ::0 ..... rt tx::1 on 00 :,;:¡:: t-I rt 01 ())C/) N:r Wt"' ¡: C1 ..... "dID :Þ C)n MO ¡:: ::3 NQ" 0\ o o ~i """ PART A. AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 1-19.3 (TAXATION) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Chapter 1-19.3 (Taxation) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, is hereby amended by creating Article V (Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions) to read as follows: Chapter 1-19.3 TAXATION ARTICLE V. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTIONS Section 1-19.3-51. Short Title. This Ordinance shall be known as County Ordinance No. 92-24, "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Requlations of St. Lucie County, Florida." Section 1-19.3-52. . Enactment and Authoritv. Pursuant to Section 3, Article VII of the State Constitution and in accordance with Chapters 125, 163, 192, 196 and 214, Florida Statutes and Florida Department of Revenue Rules, Chapter 12D-7, Florida Administrative Code, incorporated municipalities and counties individually or ln combination are authorized and empowered to adopt, amend or revise and enforce an ordinance relatinq to economic development ad valorem tax exemptions, after the electors of such municipality or county, votinq on the question ln a referendum, authorize the adoption of such ordinance. Struc]c through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 2 o ::0 OJ o o ~ o OJ N W "'d :Þ ø [r N 0\ o ~ '-' ....., ,Section 1-19.3-53. Jurisdiction. The area subiect to this Ordinance shall be incorporated and unincorporated St. Lucie County. Section 1-19.3-54. Purpose and Intent. The public health, safety, comfort, economy, order, convenience and qeneral welfare require the harmonious , orderly and proqressive development of new business and expansion of existinq business within Florida and its incorporated municipalities and counties. In furtherance of this qeneral purpose counties by Chapters 125, 163, 192, 196 and 214, Florida Statutes and Florida Department of Revenue Rules, Chapter 12D-7, Florida Administrative Code, are authorized and empowered to adopt, amend' or revise and enforce measures relatinq to economic development ad valorem tax exemptions for new business and expansion of existinq business. It is the intent' of this Ordinance to secure or to ensure: ~ The establishment of criteria for qrantinq such exemptions to certain types of businesses or industries or for denyinq exemptions on a rational, nonarbitrary, nondiscriminatory basis by the Board of County Commissioners. l..:.. No precedent shall be implied or inferred by the qrantinq of an exemption to a new or expandinG business. Applications for exemptions shall be considered bv the Board of Count v Commissioners on a case-by-case basis for each application, after consideration of the Property Appraiser's report on that application. ~ Any exemption qranted shall appl V UP to one hundred percent (100%) of the assessed value of all improvements to real property made by or for the use of a new business and all tanGible personal property of such new business, or up to one hundred percent (100%) of the assessed value of all added improvements to real property which additions are made to facilitate the expansion of an Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 3 o ::0 OJ o o ~ o Q) N W "'0 :x:- C) [%] N '" o N '-" '-II existinq business and of the net increase in all tanqible personal property acquired to facilitate such expansion of an existinq business. .L. Any exemption shall be UP to a full ten (10) year period from the time the exemption is qranted. .h No exemption shall be qranted on the land which new or expanded businesses are to be located. h No exemption shall be qranted on school or water manaqement district taxes, or on taxes levied for paYment of bonds or taxes authorized a vote of the electors of the County pursuant to Sections 9 or 12, Article VII, of the State Constitution. Section 1-19.3-55. Definition of Terms. The followinq words, phrases and terms shall have the same . meaninqs attributed to them in current Florida Statutes and the Florida Administrative Code, except where the context clearly indicates otherwise: 1..:.. Applicant - Any person or corporation submi ttinq an Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption application to the Board. ~ Board - The St. Lucie County Board of Commissioners. 1..:. Business Any activity enqaqed in by any person, corporation or company with the obiect of private or public qa~n, benefit, or advantaqe, either direct or indirect. 3.1 New Business - h A business establishinq 10 or more iobs to employ 10 or more full-time employees in this County, which manufactures, processes, Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 4 o :u tJ: o o '" o OJ N W 'tJ :Þ G) [t1 N 0\ o W '-' "-" compounds, fabricates, or produces for sale items of tanqible personal property at a fixed location and which comprises an industrial or manufacturinq plant; h A business establishinq 25 or more ;obs to employ 25 or more full-time employees in this County, the sales factor of which, as defined by s. 220.15(5\, Florida Statutes, for the facility with respect to which it requests an economic development ·ad valorem tax exemption is less than '0.50 for each year the exemption ~s claimed. No business enqaqed in retail operations as defined herein shall be eligible for an exemption pursuant to this subsection b; or ~ An office space in this state owned and used by a corporation newly domiciled in this County; provided such office space houses 50 or full-time such employees more of corporation; provided that such business or office .first beqins operation on a site clearly separate from any other commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. StrucJc through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 5 o ::ö OJ o o ,.; o Q) N W "0 :Þ ø M N 0\ o ~ 3.2 ~ "-tI sL. Any business located in an area desiqnated enterprise zone that first beqins operation on a site clearly separate from any other commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. Expansion of Existinq Business h A business establishinq 10 or more iobs to employ 10 or more full-time employees in this County, which manufactures, processes, compounds, fabricates, or produces for sale items of tanqible personal property at a fixed location and which comprises an industrial or manufacturinq plant: or ~ Any business establishinq 25 or more ;obs to employ 25 or more full-time employees in this County, the sales factor of which, as defined by s.220.15(5), Florida Statutes, for the facility with respect to which it requests an economic development ad valorem tax exemption is less than 0.50 for each Year the exemption is claimed provided that such business increases operations on a site colocated with a commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business, resultinq in a net increase in employment of not less than 10 percent or Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 6 o ~ OJ o o :;¡:; o (X) tv W ""0 ;Þ G) [Ij N '" o U1 ~ ...,¡ an increase ln productive output of not less than 10 percent. No business enqaqed in retail operations as defined herein shall be eliqible for an exemption pursuant to this subsection b. .£.:. An business located in an enter rise zone that increases operations on a site colocated with a commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. U Business enqaqed in retail operations _ a business en a ed in a sale to a consumer or to an e~son of an item of tanqible personal property for any purposes other than for resale. ~ De artment - The Florida De artment of Revenue. ~ Im rovements - Ph sical chan es made to raw land and structures placed on or under the land surface. All personal property acquired to an facilitate ex ansion of an existin business rovided that the ersonal is added or increased on or after the da the ordinance is ado ted. ersonal However uired to re lace existin shall not be considered to facilitate a businesses expansion. ~ Sales Factor - A fraction the numerator of which is the total sales of the taxpayer in this state durinq the Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 7 o ::c OJ o o ~ o (D N W '"<1 :to G) [I] N 0\ o 0\ '-' 'WI taxable year or period and the denominator of which is the total sales of the taxpayer everywhere durinq the taxable year or period. (See Section 220.15(5), Florida Statutes for specifics of computation). Section 1-19.3-56. General. The Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption is a local o tion tax incentive for new or business which ma be ranted or refused at the sole discretion of the Board. To a I for such an exemption a business locatinq or expandinq in the cor orated or unincor orated area of St".Lucie Count must file an a lication Florida De artment of Revenue Form DR-41ß.. - See Attachment 1) with the Board. Satisfactory proof that the business meets the criteria for exem tion as a new business or ex ansion of an existin business as defined by this Ordinance must accompany the Application. The Application shall be filed on or before 1 March of the year in which an exemption is requested. Exemption from County tax may only be qranted by the Board. The exemption qranted under this Ordinance shall not accrue to im rovements to real made b or for the use of new or ex businesses when such im rovements have been included on the tax rolls prior to the referendum authorizinq this Ordinance. Section 1-19.3-57. Procedure. Before the Board acts on an application, it must be submitted to the Property Appraiser for review. After careful consideration, Struc]c through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 8 o ::tI tJj o o ~ o Q) N W 'ì: :to' C) trI tv CJ\ o ~ the ,;,:":', '.: 'w ....,,¡ ralser shall re ort to the Board concernin the fiscal impact of qrantinq exemptions. the The raiser's Re ort shall include the followin : 1..:. The total revenue available to the County for the current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources. ~ The amount of revenue foreqone by the County for the current fiscal ear because of economic develo ment ad valorem tax exemptions previously qranted. .1.:. An estimate of the amount of revenue which would be foreqone for the current fiscal ,ear if the exem tion is qranted to the new or expandinq business. .i.:. After consideration of the report of the Property Appraiser, Board ma the tax choose to ado t an Ordinance exem tion to a business. The Ordinance shall be ado ted in the same manner as an other ordinance of the Count . The Ordinance shall include the followinq information~ 1..:. ~ .1.:. .i.:. The name and address of the new or expandinq business. The amount of revenue available from ad valorem tax ßources for the current fiscal year, revenue foreqone for the current fiscal year because of economic development ad valorem tax exemptions currently in effect, and the amount of estimated revenue which "·:ould be foreaone because of the exemption qranted to th~ new or expanding business. The ex iration date of the exem tion. U to ten ears from date of Board adoption of the Ordinance qrantin~ the exemption) A findin that the business meets the definition of a new business or an expansion of an existinq business. .struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 9 o :tJ 00 o o ~ o Q) N W '"0 :Þ G) [r N 0\ o Q) '-' '-t1Í .2....:. The Board's authori tv to revoke an exemption if the business no lonqer satisfies the criteria for the exemption. Section 1-19.3-58. Fees. Fees charqed to offset the cost of processinq the Economic Develo ment Ad Valorem Tax lication or an Ordinance shall be adopted bv the Board bv resolution. Section 1-19.3-59. E1iqib1e Business or Industrv. Anv business or'industry, as defined in Section 1-19.3-55, Para ra h 3.1 and 3.2 that does not as an ineli ible business or industry as defined in Section 1-19.3-60. When considerinq the issue of whether or not a busiQess or industry is an eliqible business as defined herein, the Board shall consider the anticipated number of employees, averaqewaqe, type of industr or business environmental im acts volume of business or roduction or an other information' relatin to the is sue of whether the proposed development would siqnificantlv improve economic development in St. Lucie County prior to.acceptinq the Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Application. The criteria for determininq the lenqth of an exemption and the e amount of an exem be formulated b the Board b resolution. The criteria shall provide for incentives for businesses that employ St. Lucie County residents who establish permanent domicile pursuant to Florida Statutes. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passagep are 10 o ::t CD o o :;r;: o CD tv W "'0 :Þ G') tI1 tv (j¡ o \D '-' ."wJ . Section 1-19.3-60. Ineliqible Business or Industry. Any business or industry in violation of any federal, state, or local law or requlation qoverninq environmental matters such as air, water, and noise pollution. Section 1-19.3-61. Appeals. The decision of the Board not to qrant an Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption to a particular business or industry is subiect on Iv to ;udicial review pursuant to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Section 1-19.3-62 - 1-19.3-70. Reserved. PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, and adopted prior to January 1,1969, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding"shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 11 o :u en o o " o Q) tv W "CI :x:- C) [Ij tv CT\ ~ o '-' ..." PART D. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304. PART E. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect only upon approval by the voters on November 3, 1992 of the ballot question authorized by the Board in Resolution No. 92-175. PART F. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Jim Minix AYE vice Chairman Jack Krieger AYE Commissioner Judy Culpepper AYE Commissioner Havert L. Fenn AYE Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner AYE PART G. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County,'Florida, and the word ""ordinançe" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that parts B to G shall not be codified. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 12 o ::tI 00 o o :,;; o Q) N lù '"ó :Þ G) M N 0\ ~ ~ ~ """'" PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 6th day of October, 1992. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERSI;., ST. LUCr'E COUNTY, FLORIDA· . _ Co r~.·\, CHAIRMAN . "'j .\ ,:' ¡ l··... V .. v.. l. ~ # Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 13 '. '- o ::ö OJ o o ~ o (X) N W 'U :to ø rrI N 0\ ~ N '-' LUCIE C:UUN'.r:t BOARD OF COUIIT:t COMMISSIONERS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VA' ~ TAX EXEMPTION ord.i&a.&.Dce 110. '2-24., St. Luci. ~_~. of Ord.i..o..a.Ace., Cbapt.r 1". l'lori.d.a. ~tut.. 'I'o be filed with the BOArd of County Commi..ionare of St.. Lucie County, Florio.., no latlr than Karch 1 of the yo...: the IU=P-;'lO:ì 1. a..ir.d to ta.k. .ftact. Pi..... attach ..adition..l intonu.tion, it n.c.....ry or requa.tad. 1. 8u,in... H..... and K&tling Addr..a, ~U€WA re,.! Sfbaí I=cSH /~, ßÖAß. I N(_, 2-'9f"1 It>JOv'!,T'tJIHL H-UL/-.J-.Jt:. ~; ~r P/(£'1Cð Fe:- 3",C:¡y(. 2. Pl..... give n.... and telephone n\lmk)er of Own.r or PU'.on .in Charg& of thi. bu.!n..,. H..... PI} LJL S.cl LC'w IT1- T.lephone Humber Sf, 1 _ ~ b" - -3~ 3.Ç 3. Exact LocAtion (Leg..l De.cription a.nd Str.at Addr...) of Propan.y tor which thil return h fil.dl ~P"'l f!: A.s A tbC\ II c.:: (. Pate )'ou blgan, or will blc¡in, bUlin... at thia facility. C . 26 .9 9 ----- .------.-- ~ .. DOlcription of tho improvement. to ro.l property tor which thi, e",omption i. roque.t.odl ~f c.. r FIJl' '.r1-(;::f)º_~__ uP <2.) Nç;"o,,) W>t!"~L BUILD/Nt., /ð Wc-l.IS~ (/IICJ"-J(JC¡)CTt·,'ltNt.... ~P"'-4l:U}~~~_ b. Dati of commenCement. of con.truction of improvement.. "¡IIIe; 6. A. Delcription of the t.anqibl. perlonal property fl')r" wtÜ,=,h thi. c.:;o.:p~i;~ i. :t.q1.ô...to¡J, &..~ ,;l.t. _uon ......"'p....~' .....H, Ot .I.. I..\J ;"0, purcha.od I ORICINAL COST TAXPAnR'S ESTlHATZ OP CONDITIOH i À.PPAAI~£k'S CLASS or InH DArE or ACE PI1RCB.\SE TAXPAYlR'S ESTlKATE or PAIR MAAUT VALlIE c o 2 " c o u USE O!;:..'t I'.> é'OtJ...... So T-~:_=J I I I --------.---- b. ^ver69_ Value ot Inventory on hand. c. Any .adition..l perlon..l property not l.llted A..tIove tor ....hl.ch an exempt.l.on clu.mod ~uat be. returnod or. f~::-.:. 1~---::"¿;-: - .:; j" Perlon..l Propert)' Ta.x Return) ..nd .. copy atta.ched 'to thi. torm. 7, Do you delir_~ _exemptiCi.~ .al a -H,... ~u.ine.l- iJ"":r "I An -r.xp"naion of a.n E:d.:!ti~; 2u¡¡i:-.wu· 0 e. C..cribe tho Type or Haturo of Your 8u,in..., WI'! /11I1'1NÚ¡Ç¡(J-.L"TLKZC': :1 I' - "2~' /'::'SHN...b _(1ð...~~ ~, Trade Loval (Check a. IU.ny al apply) I Whol....le 0 Kanuf.a.cturing Vprofe..iooa.l 0 Service ¡..,III.. "u.a;.ocr 01 tull-U.JDC employ... to be .mployed in St. L,uci. County, Florida. I Z, - 18 D. It a.n expan.ion of an .xilting bUlin..11 (1) He.t Incr.... in bployment o Ofhco 0 Oti." fJ or --- 11. (2) Incr.as. in productive output r..ulting trom thia exp.nlion Sal.. factor for the facility requ..ting exemption. Total 1..10. in Florida from t.hi. facilit.y-One (1) location only Tota.l ...1,. .v.rywhere froar. this fa.cility-One (1) location only 2 A~<J,.j divideci by 12. ... Da.t.o of incorporation in Plorida. lor offic. .pa.c. ow-ned and u.od by a corporation n.wly domiciled in Ploridal t,:./e¡" . Lt, Humber of. Pull-time employ... at thi. location I 13. It r.qu.ltinq an ox.mption duo t.o ,location in . .lum or kllightod ..r..., pl...... furni.h luch a.dd.1.tional 1.ntot"1:O&tior. AI eoql;:'r¡,: by t.ho Doa.rd of County Comzú..ion or Property Apprai.er. I horeby reque.t tho a.doption ot a.1\ ordil\a.nco 9ra.ntinq al\ exempt.ion from ad va.lora. ta..xatiOI\ on t.he aÞova property pIJuuant to Sec~i.or, Ui.HSS, Florida Statuto. ... incC'trpot"At'lld by Orct. Ho. t2·';H, St. L'.Jci. COûnt~' Co-.;te ot O:~in:l.n::... I a.q:u to fur:1is.h p.\JC'r otr.(". rea.onable intoJ:1U.tion as the aoarc1 of. Count.y COØIII.i..ionera or the Propony Appra..t.eor may requ..t in raqard to 'the axemptlon roc;l.;ðllt~:i herein, I he..reby cert.J.ty. that tha "information and valuation .tatad &.bovo by IU i. true, correct, and completo to the but c! ::,~ Knowl.dge "fond klali.f. (If prepared by lomoone other than the ta.xp.yer, hia decla.ration i. ba.od on all infotlllAtlor. of ,,",'hleh r,e ¡-,U any knowlodge. I OAn, It! 2.0 he¡ "ICÞ'EC, PM~ gt:V'...... ~ C 'I'up.yer) fJ A"'~, iJ~"""- 6ICHED. (Prep..r.r) (prepa.rer·s Addreu) 7I'I'LE , (P.i...p....u.... '.. :..l..~i·I....f¡-.a .. . II.. -,_·.. j PROPERTY APPRAISER'S 'JSE ONLY '" Tot.l rov.nuo a. iij~110toot1t ~§1fty or municipality f,or the cu.rrent tilea.l ye.r trom ad v..lorom ta..x &ourcu: ~, Revenu.e oat tOS44 .c608: t9 mun1.cJ.p" .1t:)' or t 0 curron't 1.&ca. y.a.r y VJ.nue 0... oxe.mptlona prev1.Ou. y qrant.o un ee tTWI"õëU"õr.7 J. Eatim.ate of the rev.'nuo which would be loet to the county or lIIunl.::ipa.lity durinq the current ti.ea.l )'...r it \.Iu exeo,.pticn applied for ware qra.ntod ht :.he property tor which the exemption i. requ..ted oth.rwi.. b.on subject to tu::a.tionl ~3.51ö.B2 .. EItJ.mat.e of the ta.xa.blo v..lue la.t. t.o th~ county it tho ex.mption ..ppliod tor war. qra.nt.d I $397, BOO_ ~. Eetim..ted number o~ St. Lucie County reaident.1I employed by countYI _ Iltprovornenta t.o ro..l property $370 600 ;., 1 have det.eI'Duned tha.t the property ~1.ate:J ..bove ""beta the det1.nltlon, &. incoporared by Oed, No. 92-2', St. Lucie County Code ot Ordinancell C , or «DiU.er 0 . 2007 Lut. year tor which exemption may be applled: RETUF' TO BE FILED f orldb. ::>tðtutCII, txilltJ.og bU!linclIII :A'!'E: 5-29-2000 SICNEDI .. '-' ...,,; ORDINANCE NO. 00-26 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE COUNTY ; ESTABLISHING AN EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAXATION FOR BLUEWATER SPORT FISHING BOATS, INC., 2901 INDUSTRIAL AVENUE 3, FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA, A NEW BUSINESS; PROVIDING THE AMOUNT OF REVENUE A V AILABLE FROM AD V ALOREM TAX SOURCES FOR THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR AND THE AMOUNT OF ESTIMATED REVENUE FROM THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR WHICH WOULD BE LOST BECAUSE OF THE EXEMPTION GRANTED TO BLUEWATER SPORT FISHING BOATS, INC.; PROVIDING AN EXPIRATION DATE OF THE EXEMPTION FROM THE DATE ON BOARD ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A FINDING THAT BLUEWATER SPORT FISHING BOATS, INC. MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A NEW BUSINESS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA: ARTICLE I Short Title This Ordinance shall be known as County Ordinance No. 00-26 "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption - Bluewater Sport Fishing Boats, Inc. '-' ....,¡ ORDINANCE NO. 00-26 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE COUNTY; ESTABLISHING AN EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAXATION FOR BLUEWATER SPORT FISHING BOATS, INC., 2901 INDUSTRIAL AVENUE 3, FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA, A NEW BUSINESS; PROVIDING THE AMOUNT OF REVENUE A V AILABLE FROM AD V ALOREM TAX SOURCES FOR THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR AND THE AMOUNT OF ESTIMATED REVENUE FROM THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR WHICH WOULD BE LOST BECAUSE OF THE EXEMPTION GRANTED TO BLUEWATER SPORT FISHING BOATS, INC.; PROVIDING AN EXPIRATION DATE OF THE EXEMPTION FROM THE DATE ON BOARD ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A FINDING THAT BLUEWATER SPORT FISHING BOATS, INC. MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A NEW BUSINESS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA: ARTICLE I Short Title This Ordinance shall be known as County Ordinance No. 00-26 "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption - Bluewater Sport Fishing Boats, Inc. '-' ....., ARTICLE II Procedure After consideration of the report of the Property Appraiser and in accordance with the procedure set forth in County Ordinance 92-24, "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Regulations of St. Lucie County, Florida", the Board grants and establishes an exemption fr'om ad valorem taxation of the assessed value of Bluewater Sport Fishing Boats, Inc., 2901 Industrial Avenue 3, Fort Pierce, Florida, in accordance with the following exemption phase out schedule: Year 1 (Fiscal Year 2000-01) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 Year 8 100 'Yo 90 'Yo 80 'Yo 70 'Yo 60'Yo 40% 20'Yo O'Yo No exemption shall be granted on the land on which improvements are made by Bluewater Sport Fishing Boats, Inc. ARTICLE III Ad V alorem Tax Revenues Total revenues are available to the County for the current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources is $13,330,031.98. Revenues lost to the County for the current fiscal year by ad valorem tax exemptions under this section currently in effect are $44,608.19. Revenues ~. 'wtII to be lost by granting of this exemption for the current fiscal year are estimated to be $3,518.82. ARTICLE IV Expiration Date The Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption granted to Bluewater Sport Fishing Boats, Inc., a new business shall be for seven (7) years from the date of Board adoption of this Ordinance. . ARTICLE V Finding The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, finds that Bluewater Sport Fishing Boats, Inc. is a new business as defined by St. Lucie County Ordinance No. 92- 24 and Section 196.012(16), Florida Statutes. The Board reserves the right to repeal the exemption if Bluewater Sport Fishing Boats, Inc. no longer satisfies the criteria set out above. ARTICLE VI Severability If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason found void, invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, independent, and severable provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. · '-'" ..., ARTICLE VII Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect upon receipt of notice of filing from the Secretary of State. ARTICLE VIII Adoption After motion and second, the vote on this Ordinance was as follows: Chairman John D. Bruhn XX Vice Chairman Frannie Hutchinson XX Commissioner Doug Coward XX Commissioner Paula Lewis XX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this _ day of ,2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney --.. " AGENDA REQUEST ITeJNO. --5IL- DATE: July 18, 2000 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application - QVC St. Lucie, Inc. - Ordinance No. 00- 27. BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMEND A TION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Ordinance No. 00-27 as drafted. LX] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CE: COMMISSION ACTION: ouglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 ~ "wi INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 00-1010 DATE: July 6,2000 SUBJECT: 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application - QVC St. Lucie, Inc. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: On October 6, 1992, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 92-24 establishing a program to exempt certain new and expanding businesses from ad valorem taxation as allowed by state law, a copy of which is attached. The ordinance was adopted subject to a referendum held on November 3, 1992 which passed. Attached is an application filed by QVC St. Lucie, Inc. As required by state law, the application was forwarded to the St. Lucie County Property Appraiser for review. The comments and findings of the Property Appraiser are contained in the application. As the memorandum states, QVC St. Lucie, Inc. submitted the required information and met the statutory definition of a new business. The Property Appraiser's estimate of the taxable value lost to the County if the exemption is granted is $6,124,810.00. The Property Appraiser's estimate of revenue which would be lost to the County during the current fiscal year if the exemption were granted is $54,178.23. '-' ...., The application reflects 1000-1600 St. Lucie County residents to be employed by QVC St. Lucie, Inc. As proposed, QVC St. Lucie, Inc. would receive a five (5) year exemption, phased as follows: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 100 'Yo 100% 100'Yo 100 'Yo 100 'Yo Also attached is a copy of draft Ordinance No. 00-27 which, if adopted, would grant QVC economic ad valorem tax exemption for a period of five years. Permission to advertise was granted on June 27, 2000. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Ordinance No. 00-27 as drafted. Respectfully submitted, DSM/ caf Attachments ~ s .' '-' ..."",; ORDINANCE NO. 92-24 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1-19.3 (TAXATION) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY CREATING ARTICLE V (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTIONS) RELATING TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE COUNTY; ESTABLISHING AN EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAXATION FOR CERTAIN NEW AND EXPANDING BUSINESS PROPERTIES; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING PROCEDURES FOR APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION; SPECIFYING DUTIES OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER IN CONNECTION· WITH SUCH PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING· PROVISIONS; SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY; FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; EFFECTIVE DATE; ADOPTION; AND CODIFICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes, provides the Board of County Commissioners may hold a referendum granting Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions under section 3, Article VII of the State Constitution. 2. This Board believes that amending Chapter 1-19.3 (Taxation) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, by creating Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions for a new or expanding business is in the best interest of the healthl safety and public welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County I Florida. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County I Florida: btruck through. passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 1 ::t 'TIc... (D ~·o (1~:þ o (D ;:3 t; ;:3 a.Z(D (D~ a. ::I: .. 0 (1)...... o~~ I-' ~ I ..¡ t:;~n IN...... \D (D wN~ 010 ~~H1 ;;'Q)~ ","O\(D :þ n . ¡... ::s: t; (1 o~ ::t ¡... rt tJ: on 00 ;A;~ t; rt 01 (DC/) N;t Wr-< ~ (1 ¡... -U(D :þ G")n MO ~ ;:3 NQ" 0\ o o '-' .....,¡ PART A. AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 1-19.3 (TAXATION) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Chapter 1-19.3 (Taxation) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, is hereby amended by creating Article V (Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions) to read as follows: Chapter 1-19.3 TAXATION ARTICLE V. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTIONS Section 1-19.3-51. Short Title. This Ordinance shall be known as County Ordinance No. 92-24, "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Requlations of St. Lucie County, Florida." Section 1-19.3-52. . Enactment and Authoritv. Pursuant to Section 3, Article VII of the State Constitution and in accordance with Chapters 125, 163, 192, 196 and 214, Florida Statutes and Florida Department of Revenue Rules, Chapter 12D-7, Florida Administrative Code, incorporated municipalities and counties individual Iv or in combination are authorized and empowered to adopt, amend or reV1.se and enforce an ordinance relatinq to economic development ad valorem tax exemptions, after the electors of such municipality or county, votinq on the question in a referendum, authorize the adoption of such ordinance. Struc]c through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 2 o ::c IJ: o o ::x: o Q) N W 'ij :Þ ø [Ij N 0\ o ~ '-" \wi ,Section 1-19.3-53. Jurisdiction. The area sub;ect to this Ordinance shall be incorporated and unincorporated St. Lucie County. Section 1-19.3-54. Purpose and Intent. The public health, safety, comfort, economy, order, convenience and qeneral welfare require the harmonious, orderly and proqressive development of new business and expansion of existinq business within Florida and its incorporated municipalities and counties. In furtherance of this qeneral purpose counties by Chapters 125, 163, 192, 196 and 214, Flòrida Statutes and Florida Department of Revenue Rules, Chapter 12D-7, Florida Administrative Code, are authorized and empowered to adopt, amend or revise and enforce measures relatinq to economic development ad valorem tax exemptions for new business and expansion of existinq business. It is the intent' of this Ordinance to secure or to ensure: ~ The establishment of criteria for qrantinq such exemptions to certain types of businesses or industries or for denyinq exemptions on a rational, nonarbitrary, nondiscriminatory basis by the Board of County Commissioners. ~ No precedent shall be implied or inferred by the qrantinq of an exemption to a new or expandinq business. Applications for exemptions shall be considered bv the Board of Count v Commissioners on a case-by-case basis for each application, after consideration of the Property Appraiser's report on that application. 1-:. Any exemption qranted shall apply UP to one hundred percent (100%) of the assessed value of all improvements to real property made by or for the use of a new business and all tanqible personal property of such new business, or up to one hundred percent (100%) of the assessed value of all added improvements to real property which additions are made to facilitate the expansion of an Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 3 o ~ tIJ o o ~ o Q) N W 'tJ ;Þ ø [t1 N 0\ o N '-' "'-" existinq business and of the net increase in all tanqible personal property acquired to facilitate such expansion of an existinq business. h Any exemption shall be UP to a full ten (10) year period from the time the exemption is qranted. ~ No exemptIon shall be qranted on the land which new or expanded businesses are to be located. L:. No exemption shall be qranted on school or water manaqement district taxes, or on taxes levied for payment of bonds or taxes authorized a vote of the electors of the County pursuant to Sections 9 or 12, Article VII, of the State Constitution. Section 1-19.3-55. Definition of Terms. The followinq words, phrases and terms shall have the same .. meaninqs attributed to them in current Florida Statutes and the Florida Administrative Code, except where the context clearly indicates otherwise: 1.:.. Applicant - Any person or corporation submittinq an Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption application to the Board. ~ Board - The St. Lucie County Board of Commissioners. .h. Business Any activity enqaqed in by any person, corporation or company with the obiect of private or public qain, benefit, or advantaqe, either direct or indirect. 3.1 New Business - .ª-.:.. A business establishinq 10 or more iobs to employ 10 or more full-time employees in this County, which manufactures, processes, Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 4 o ~ OJ o o ~ o (» N W 't3 :Þ G) tI1 N '" o w !2.:. ~ "wi compounds, fabricates, or produces for sale items of tanqible personal property at a fixed location and which comprises an industrial or manufacturinq plant~ A business establishinq 25 or more iobs to employ 25 or more full-time employees in this County, the sales factor of which, as defined by s. 220.15(5), Florida Statutes, for the facility with respect to which it requests an economic development .ad valorem tax exemption is less than '0.50 for each year the exa.mption is claimed. No business enqaqed in retail operations as defined herein shall be eliqible for an exemption pursuant to this subsection b~ or ~ An office space in this state owned and used by a corporation newly domiciled in this County~ provided such office space houses 50 or full-time such employees of more corporation ~ provided that such business or office .first beqins operation on a site clearly separate from any other commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. StrucJc through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 5 o ::0 0:1 o o :;¡::: o Q) N W '"d :Þ G) tr N 0\ o ¡þ. 3.2 '-' ...., fL. Any business located in an area desiqnated enterprise zone that first beqins operation on a site clearly separate from any other commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. Expansion of Existinq Business ä..:... A business establishinq 10 or more iobs to employ 10 or more full-time employees in this County, which manufactures, processes, compounds, fabricates, or produces for sale items of tanqible personal property at a fixed location and which comprises an industrial or manufacturinq plant: or ~ Any business establishinq 25 or more iobs to employ 25 or more full-time employees in this County, the sales factor of which, as defined by s.220.15(5), Florida Statutes, for the facility with respect to which it requests an economic development ad valorem tax exemption is less than 0.50 for each year the exemption is claimed provided that such business increases operations on a site colocated with a commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business, resultinq in a net increase in employment of not less than 10 percent or StrucJc through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 6 o ~ t:x:! o o ~ o Q) N W 'i::! :Þ C) rrJ N '" o U1 '-" ....,., an increase In productive output of not less than 10 percent. No business enqaqed In retail operations as defined herein shall be eliqible for an exemption pursuant to this subsection b. .£.:.. An business located in an enter rise zone that increases operations on a site colocated with a commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. U Business enqaqed in retail operations - a business en a ed in a sale to a consumer or to an e~son of an item of tanqible personal property for any purposes other than for resale. ~ Department - The Florida Department of Revenue. ~ rm rovements - Ph sical chan es made to raw land and structures placed on or under the land surface. All personal property acquired to an facilitate ex ansion of an existin business rovided that the ersonal is added or increased on or after the da the ordinance is ado ted. However ersonal uired to re lace existin shall not be considered to facilitate a businesses expansion. ~ Sales Factor - A fraction the numerator of which is the total sales of the taxpayer in this state durinq the Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 7 o :a 00 o o x o Q) N W 'tJ :Þ G) r1] N 0\ o 0\ '-' "J taxable year or period and the denominator of which is the total sales of the taxpayer everywhere durinq the taxable year or period. (See Section 220.15(5). Florida Statutes for specifics of computation). Section 1-19.3-56. General. The Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption is a local option tax incentive for new or expandinq business which may be qranted or refused at the sole discretion of the Board. To apply for such an exemption a business locatinq or expandinq in the corporated or unincorporated area of St'. Lucie County must file an application (Florida Department of Revenue Form DR-418-.. - See Attachment 1) with the Board. Satisfactory proof that the business meets the criteria for exemption as a new business or expansion of an existinq business as defined by this Ordinance must accompany the Application. The Application shall be filed on or before 1 March of the year in which an exemption is requested. Exemption from County tax may only be qranted by the Board. The exemption qranted under this Ordinance shall not accrue to improvements to real property made by or for the use of new or expandinq businesses when such improvements have been included on the tax rolls prior to the referendum authorizinq this Ordinance. Section 1-19.3-57. Procedure. Before the Board acts on an application. it must be submitted to the Property Appraiser for review. After careful consideration. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 8 o ::t3 tI:J o o :;:.;: o Q) tv W '"d :Þ G') [T tv 0\ o ~ ..~', .' '-' '.w1I the raiser shall re ort to the Board concernin the fiscal impact of qrantinq exemptions. The raiser's Re ort shall include the followin : .L. The total revenue available to the County for the current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources. £.:. The amount of revenue foreqone by the County for the current fiscal year because of economic development ad valorem tax exemptions previously qranted. .h An estimate of the amount of revenue which would be foreqone for the current fiscal ,ear if the exem tion is qranted to the new or expandinq business. h the After consideration of the report of the Property Appraiser, Board ma choose to ado t an Ordinance the tax exem tion to a business. The Ordinance shall be ado ted in the same manner as an other ordinance of the Count . The Ordinance shall include the followinq information: .L. The name and address of the new or expandinq business. £.:. The amount of revenue available from ad valorem tax sources for the current fiscal year, revenue foreqone for the current fiscal year because of economic development ad valorem tax exemptions currently in effect, and the amount of estimated revenue which \·:ould be foreaone because of the exemption qranted to th~ new or expanding business. .h The ex iration date of the from date of Board adoption exemption) h A findinq that the business meets the definition of a new business or an expansion of an existinq business. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 9 o :u !XI o o " o Q) tv W '"(j ;Þ C) [%j N 0\ o Q) '-' ...1 ~ The Board's authori tv to revoke an exemption if the business no lonqer satisfies the criteria for the exemption. Section 1-19.3-58. Fees. Fees charqed to offset the cost of processinq the Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Application or any Exemption Ordinance shall be adopted by the Board bv resolution. Section 1-19.3-59. E1iqib1e Business or Industry. Anv business or industry, as defined in Section 1-19.3-55, Paraqraph 3.1 and 3.2, that does not qualify as an ineliqible business or industry às defined in Section 1-19.3-60. When considerinq the issue of whether or not a business or industry is an eliqible business as defined herein, the Board shall consider the anticipated number of employees, averaqe waqe, type of industry or business, environmental impacts, volume of business or production or any other information· relatinq to the issue of whether the proposed development would siqnificantlv improve economic development in St. Lucie County prior to acceptinq the Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Application. The criteria for determininq the lenqth of an exemption and the percentaqe amount of an exemption may be formulated bv the Board by resolution. The criteria shall provide for incentives for businesses that employ St. Lucie County residents who establish permanent domicile pursuant to Florida Statutes. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 10 o :u OJ o o " o Q) N W 't :Þ GJ f:Ij N 0\ o \D '-' 'wi' . Section 1-19.3-60. Ine1iqib1e Business or Industry. Any business or industry in violation of any federal, state, or local law or requlation qoverninq environmental matters such as air, water, and noise pollution. Section 1-19.3-61. Appeals. The decision of the Board not to qrant an Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption to a particular business or industry is subiect only to iudicial review pursuant to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Section 1-19.3-62 - 1-19.3-70. Reserved. PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, and adopted prior to January 1, 1969, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. £trucJe through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 11 o ::t! tx:I o o ~ o ()) tv W 'ï:I :x:- C) CI:I tv 0\ ~ o '-' ....., PART D. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304. PART E. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect only upon approval by the voters on November 3, 1992 of the ballot question authorized by the Board in Resolution No. 92-175. PART F. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Jim Minix AYE vice Chairman Jack Krieger AYE Commissioner Judy Culpepper AYE Commissioner Havert L. Fenn AYE Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner AYE PART G. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County,' Florida, and the word" "ordinançe" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that parts B to G shall not be codified. Struc1c through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 12 . o ::0 ttJ o o ~ o Q) N W "'C :x:- C) [tj N 0\ ~ ~ '-' ....., PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 6th day of October, 1992. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISS IONERS'; " ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA· . _ l. (1~~. ~ ~ 1 CHAIRMAN ' "j v1 >f~%é~~ ~ /:~~~~~~»~'<,~:';"'" t,' "\, ' r -,> ¡' ,.""C" ,',' \ ~~~ ~,~ ( .~,'" " ... . j \Z:¡Effi~~) '.. :j... \... . .:.. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 13 .. '- o ~ OJ o o ;:¡;:: o CO tv W 'ï: :Þ ø rr1 tv 0\ ~ tv ~ J Douglas Dixon, r'~rk of the Circuit Court - 't. Lucie County File Number: J. \...JJ.. J.. 7 J.. 7 OR BOOK OJ.. 3 PAGE 03 5 7 Recorded: lO-27~2 02:43 P.M. .....,/ RESOLUTION NO. 92-264 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION PHASE OUT SCHEDULE AND PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION ELIGIBILITY RATE SCHEDULE FOR NEW OR EXPANDING BUSINESS APPLYING FOR AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 92-24 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Fl~rida, has made the following determinations: 1. On September 8, 1992, this Board adopted Resolution 92- 175 which implemented the provisions of Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes which authorized the Board of County commissioners the authority to call a referendum on the issue of granting a local Option Economic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption. 2. On October 6, 1992, this Board adopted Ordinance No. 92- 24, which amended Chapter 1-19.3 (TAXATION) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, by creating Article V - Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption. Enactment of Ordinance No. 92-24 is contingent on a majority vote in the November referendum election. 3. Section 1-19.3-59 (Eligibility Business or Industry) of Ordinance No. 92-24 provides for the formulation of criteria for determining the length of an exemption and the percentage amount of an exemption pursuant to resolution of this Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of st. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board hereby adopts the Property Tax Exemptions Phase Out Schedule and Property Tax Eligibility Chart, attached 1 :- '-' "will hereto and referred to collectively as "Exhibit A," for purposes of establishing eligibility of a tax exemption for new or expanding businesses pursuant to Ordinance No. 92-24. 2. This Board shall provide incentives for businesses to employ St. Lucie County residents. These incentives shall be the following: a) If a business can verify after the first year of exemption that sixty percent (60%) of its full-time employees have been St. Lucie County residents for at least six (6) months prior to employment then said business shall be entitled to one àdditional year from the standard exemption as set forth on "Exhibit A." b) If a business can verify after the first year of exemption that eighty percent (80%) of its full-time employees have been St. Lucie County residents for at least six (6) months prior to employment then said business shall be entitled to two additional years from the standard exemption as set forth on "Exhibit A." 3. The Board shall have the discretion to modify the eligibílity requirements based on other significant factors including, but not limited to, the following: a) The increase in local employment attributable to the new or expanding business; b) The unemployment and underemployment of the available local labor force and the types and wages of jobs created therein; c) The amount of capital investment purchased by the new or expanding business; d) The ability of the county to otherwise meet its total fiscal needs should the requested exemption be granted; e) The cost of any increased local government services, including but not limited to roads, water, sewer, gas and law enforcement, and other direct expenditures associated with that specific business. 2 o :x1 t;: o o à o œ ~ Lù "'a ;Þ Q L'1 o Lù lJ1 œ '-' 'wIÎ After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Jim Minix AYE Vice Chairman Jack Krieger AYE Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner AYE Commissioner Havert L. Penn AYE Commissioner Judy Culpepper AYE PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 1992. ATTEST: . BOARD' OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FL~RÌDÄ : 9= ,." _~·.·'·~l· By: ~ . Chairman '.~ Iv '/., .....:. ' 'j -f! 'j'); "", "." I - L/ÆL4-~~~~ De:títý; tCl~~' ¡p.~ ........"...... ."".~ (~ '- v.." I.~;'-~ "'~... '?\ lij(~~;.~;:~y~:~ \\~\} .1 ,..- · ,. .. . . > - . '1 i~~1_@~1~1 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: f) I ) - //i 91/' . ¿U2#t/íRÞ< County Attor~ey / ./ / _/ 3 o ~ tp o o ;:>;: o CD ~ W "'C :J> Q tr1 o w U1 \Q \..f ."-,,, ORDINANCE NO. 00- 27 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE COUNTY ; ESTABLISHING AN EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAXATION FOR AVC ST. LUCIE, INC., 300 N.W. PEACOCK BOULEVARD, PORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA, A NEW BUSINESS; PROVIDING THE AMOUNT OF REVENUE AVAILABLE FROM AD VALOREM TAX SOURCES FOR THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR AND THE . AMOUNT OF ESTIMATED REVENUE FROM THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR WHICH WOULD BE LOST BECAUSE OF THE EXEMPTION GRANTED TO QVC ST. LUCIE, INC.; PROVIDING AN EXPIRATION DATE OF THE EXEMPTION FROM THE DATE ON BOARD ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A FINDING THAT QVC ST. LUCIE, INC. MEETS THE DEFINITION OF A NEW BUSINESS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA: ARTICLE I Short Title This Ordinance shall be known as County Ordinance No. 00-27 "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption - QVC St. Lucie, Inc. ARTICLE II Procedure After consideration of the report of the Property Appraiser and in accordance with the procedure set forth in County Ordinance 92-24, "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Regulations of St. Lucie County, Florida", the Board grants and establishes an '-' .."", exemption from ad valorem taxation of the assessed value of QVC St. Lucie, Inc., 300 N.W. Peacock Boulevard, Port St. Lucie, Florida, in accordance with the following schedule: Year 1 (Fiscal Year 2000-01) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 100'}'o 100'}'o 100'}'o 100 'Yo 100'}'o No exemption shall be granted on the land on which improvements are made by QVC St. Lucie, Inc. ARTICLE III Ad V alorem Tax Revenues Total revenues are available to the County for the current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources is $73,330,031.98. Revenues lost to the County for the current fiscal year by ad valorem tax exemptions under this section currently in effect are $44,608.19. Revenues to be lost by granting of this exemption for the current fiscal year are estimated to be $54,178.28. ARTICLE IV Expiration Date The Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption granted to QVC St. Lucie, Inc., a new business shall be for five (5) years from the date of Board adoption of this Ordinance. ARTICLE V Finding The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, finds that QVC St. '-' ...., Lucie, Inc. is a new business as defined by St. Lucie County Ordinance No. 92-24 and Section 196.012(16), Florida Statutes. The Board reserves the right to repeal the exemption if QVC St. Lucie, Inc. no longer satisfies the criteria set out above. ARTICLE VI Severability If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason found void, invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, independent, and severable provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. ARTICLE VII Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect upon receipt of notice of filing from the Secretary of State. ARTICLE VIII Adoption After motion and second, the vote on this Ordinance was as follows: Chairman John D. Bruhn XX Vice Chairman Frannie Hutchinson XX Commissioner Doug Coward XX Commissioner Paula Lewis XX '-' .....J Commissioner Cliff Barnes xx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this _ day of ,2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney '-' ,..." ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION APPLICATION Ordinance No. 92-24, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances, Chapter 196, Florida Statutes To be filed with the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, no later than March 1 of the year the exemption is desired to take effect. Please attach additional information, if necessary or requested. 1. Business Name and Mailing Address: QVC ST. LUCIE. INC.. 300 NW Peacock Boulevard. Port St. LuèÏe. Florida 34985. 2. Please give name and telephone number of Owner or Person in Charge of this business: Name: Diana Beard. General Manager Telephone Number: (561) 873-4333 3. Exact Location (Legal Description and Street Address) of Property for which this return is filed: 300 NW Peacock Boulevard.. Port St. Lucie. Florida 34985 (See attached Exhibit "An for legal description. 4. Date you began, or will begin, business at this facility: October 1. 1999. 5. a. Description of the improvements to real property for which this exemption is requested: Two (2)-Story. approximately 53.000 square feet facility. having more than 400 office areas and a self-contained cafeteria. with associated fixtures. and necessary improvements to the propertv. including but not limited to above-ground and underground utilities. paved parking area and landscaping. The estimated value for all such improvements is $6.228.334.00. however. actual construction costs were $6.337.669.00. b. Date of commencement of construction of improvements: April 8. 1999. '-' .....,¡ 6. a. Description of the tangible personal property for which this exemption is requested and date when property was, or is to be, purchased: Class of Item Age Date Of Purchase Original Cost Ta,xpayer's Estimate of Condition Good Average Poor Taxpayer's APPRAISER'S Estimate of USE Fair Market ONL Y Value Condition OFFICE FURNITURE 7 MONTHS 07/0 I/99 $3,132.00 X $2,936.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 7 MONTHS 07/01/99 $206,579.00 X $193,667.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 7 MONTHS 07/01/99 $46,068.00 X $43,189.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 6 MONTHS 08/01/99 $4,900.00 X $4.594.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 6 MONTHS 08/01/99 $4,168.00 X $3,908.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 4 MONTHS 1 % 1/99 $14,829.00 X $13,903.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 4 MONTHS 1 % 1/99 $4,095.00 X $3,839.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $1,949.00 X $1,828.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $5,058.00 X $4,742.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS 11/0 1/99 $27,328.00 X $25,620.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $7,624.00 X $7,147.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS I I/O li99 $10,533.00 X $9,875.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $77,706.00 X $72,849.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $43,951.00 X $41.204.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS II /0 1 /99 $4,182.00 X $3,921.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $8,145.00 X $7,636.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $9,149.00 X $8,577 .00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $38,797.00 X $36,372.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $54,025.00 X $50,648.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS 11/0 I/99 $7.630.00 X $7,153.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS I I/O 1/99 $50,609.00 X $47.446.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS 1 I/O I/99 $47,409.00 X $44,446.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS 11/0 1 /99 $47,164.00 X $44,216.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $47,448.00 X $44,483.00 2 '-' ."'wJI OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS 1110 1/99 $31,616.00 X $29,640.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 3 MONTHS 1110 l/99 $25,314.00 X $23,732.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 2 MONTHS 12/01/99 $7,630.00 X $7.153.00 OFFICE FURNITURE 2 MONTHS 12/01/99 $8,302.00 X $7,783.00 TOT ALS $845,340.00 $792,507.00 MACH & EQUIP 8 MONTHS 06/01/99 $14,829.00 X $12,358.00 MACH & EQUIP 3 MONTHS 11101/99 $11 ,31 0.00 X $'10,180.00 TOTALS $26,139.00 $22,538.00 SECURITY EQUIP 2 MONTHS 12/01/99 $6,230.00 X $5,451.00 TOTALS $6,230.00 $5,451.00 OFFICE EQUIP 5 MONTHS 09/01/99 $11,933.00 X $10,740.00 OFFICE EQUIP 4 MONTHS 10/0 1/99 $387.00 X $322.00 OFFICE EQUIP 3 MONTHS 11/0 l/99 $2,000.00 X $1,800.00 OFFICE EQUIP 3 MONTHS 11101/99 $895.00 X $806.00 TOTALS $15,215.00 $13,668.00 SOFTW ARE 7 MONTHS 07/01/99 $17.627.00 X $14,690.00 SOFTWARE 6 MONTHS 08/01/99 $1,100.00 X $917.00 SOFTWARE 4 MONTHS 1 % 1/99 $4,219.00 X $3,514.00 SOFTWARE 4 MONTHS 1 % 1/99 $4,528.00 X $3,774.00 SOFTWARE 4 MONTHS 10/0 l/99 $3,026.00 X $2,522.00 SOFTWARE 4 MONTHS 10/0 1/99 $12,805.00 X $10,671.00 SOFTWARE 3 MONTHS 11/0 1/99 $8.700.00 X $7,250.00 SOFTWARE 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $21,654.00 X $18,045.00 SOFTWARE 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $2.002.00 X $1,669.00 SOFTWARE 2 MONTHS 12/01/99 $5,000.00 X $4,167.00 SOFTW ARE 2 MONTHS 12/01/99 $518.00 X $432.00 TOT ALS $81,179.00 $67,651.00 ., ,) '-' """" DA T A PRoe EQUIP 10 MONTHS 04/0 1/99 $91,647.00 X $76,372.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 10 MONTHS 04/0 1/99 $67,541.00 X $56.284.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 8 MONTHS 06/0 1/99 $4,523.00 X $3,769.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 8 MONTHS 06/01/99 $2,005.00 X $1,671.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 8 MONTHS 06/01/99 $73,330.00 X $61,108.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 7 MONTHS 07/01/99 $16,463.00 X $13,719.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 7 MONTHS 07/01/99 $1'8,964.00 X $15,804.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 7 MONTHS 07/01/99 $11,337.00 X $9,447.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 7 MONTHS 07/01/99 $15,117.00 X $12,598.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 7 MONTHS 07/01/99 $934.00 X $778.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 6 MONTHS 08/01/99 $2,151.00 X $1,793.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 6 MONTHS 08/01/99 $149,100.00 X $124,250.00 DA TA PRoe EQUIP 5 MONTHS 09/01/99 $13,013.00 X $10,844.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 5 MONTHS 09/01/99 $5,436.00 X $4,530.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 4 MONTHS 10/01/99 $1,715.00 X $1,429.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 4 MONTHS 10/0 1/99 $4,282.00 X $3,568.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 4 MONTHS 10/01/99 $2,262.00 X $1,885.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 4 MONTHS 10101/99 $1,450.00 X $1,208.00 DA T A PRoe EQUIP 4 MONTHS 1 % 1/99 $1,529.00 X $ L274.00 DA T A PRoe EQUIP 3 MONTHS 11/0 1/99 $24.00 X $20.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $756.00 X $630.00 DATA PRoe EQUIP 2 MONTHS 12/01/99 $11 ,463.00 X $9,553.00 TOTALS $495,042.00 $412,534.00 P.e. EQUIP II MONTHS 03/01/99 $10.380.00 X $8,650.00 P.e. EQUIP 8 MONTHS 06/01/99 $43,184.00 X $35,986.00 P.e. EQUIP 8 MONTHS 06/0 1/99 $15,224.00 X $12,687.00 P.C. EQUIP 8 MONTHS 06/01/99 $17,613.00 X $14,677.00 P.e. EQUIP 7 MONTHS 07/01/99 $3.196.00 X $2,663.00 P.e. EQUIP 6 MONTHS 08/01/99 $12.766.00 X $10,639.00 4 '-" ....., P.e. EQUIP 6 MONTHS 08/01/99 $2,118.00 X $1,765.00 P.e. EQUIP 6 MONTHS 08/01/99 $6,708.00 X $5,590.00 P.e. EQUIP 6 MONTHS 08/0 I/99 $17,511.00 X $14,592.00 P.e. EQUIP 6 MONTHS 08/0 I/99 $4,702.00 X $3,918.00 P.C. EQUIP 6 MONTHS 08/0 I/99 $21,214.00 X $ I 7,678.00 P.C. EQUIP 5 MONTHS 09/0 I/99 $2,361.00 X $1,968.00 P.e. EQUIP 5 MONTHS 09/0 I/99 $5,102.00 X $4,251.00 P.C. EQUIP o' 5 MONTHS 09/0 I/99 $730.00 X $608.00 P.e. EQUIP 5 MONTHS 09/0 I/99 $1,159.00 X $966.00 P.C. EQUIP 5 MONTHS 09/0 I/99 $1,072.00 X $893.00 P.C. EQUIP 5 MONTHS 09/0 I/99 $2,628.00 X $2,190.00 P.C. EQUIP 5 MONTHS 09/0 I/99 $6,686.00 X $5,572.00 P.C. EQUIP 5 MONTHS 09/01/99 $26,317.00 X $21,931.00 P.C. EQUIP 4 MONTHS 10/01/99 $1,219.00 X $1,016.00 P.C. EQUIP 4 MONTHS 1 % 1/99 $48,225.00 X $40,187.00 P.C. EQUIP 3 MONTHS 11/0 I/99 $85.00 X $71.00 P.e. EQUIP 3 MONTHS 11/0 I/99 $321.00 X $268.00 P.e. EQUIP 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $961.00 X $801.00 P.C. EQUIP 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $2,424.00 X $2,020.00 P.C. EQUIP 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $7,370.00 X $6,142.00 P.e. EQUIP 2 MONTHS 12/01/99 $7,615.00 X $6,346.00 P.e. EQUIP 2 MONTHS 12/0 I/99 $6,569.00 X $5,4 74.00 TOTALS $275,460.00 $229,549.00 TELEPHONE EQUIP 8 MONTHS 06/0 1/99 $552,116.00 X $496,905.00 TELEPHONE EQUIP 7 MONTHS 07/01/99 $1,585.00 X $1,426.00 TELEPHONE EQUIP 6 MONTHS 08/01/99 $518,419.00 X $466,577.00 TELEPHONE EQUIP 5 MONTHS 09/01/99 $4,613.00 X $4,151.00 TELEPHONE EQUIP 4 MONTHS 10/01/99 $3,570.00 X $3.214.00 TELEPHONE EQUIP 4 MONTHS 1 % 1/99 $302,500.00 X $272,250.00 TELEPHONE EQUIP 4 MONTHS 1 % 1/99 $1,207.512.00 X $1,086,760.00 5 '-' """"" TELEPHONE EQUIP 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $84,257.00 X $63,193.00 TELEPHONE EQUIP 3 MONTHS 11/01/99 $400.00 X $360.00 TELEPHONE EQUIP 2 MONTHS 12/0 1/99 $34,606.00 X $31,145.00 TELEPHONE EQUIP 2 MONTHS 12/0 1/99 $127,225.00 X $114,503.00 TOTALS 52,836,803.00 52,540,484.00 GRAND TOTALS 54,581,408.00 $4,084,382.00 b. Average Value of Inventory on hand: NI A. c. Any additional personal property not listed above for which an exemption is claimed must be returned on fonn DR-405 (Tangible Personal Property Tax Return) and a copy attached to this fonn. N/A. 7. Do you desire exemption as a: x "New Business" or as an "Expansion of an Existing Business" 8. Describe the Type or Nature of Your Business: Telecommunications facility for . direct response television business. providing such support as data entry. order entry. customer' service and product information assistance. 9. Trade Level (Check as many as apply): Wholesale _ Manufacturing Professional Service Office X Other 10. a. Number of full-time employees to be employed in 51. Lucie County, Florida: 1000 - 1600 b. If an expansion of an existing business: NI A (1) Net increase in Employment_% (2) Increase in productive output resulting from this expansion_ % 11. Sales factor for the facility requesting exemption: N/A Total sales in Florida from this facility-One (1) location only Total sales everywhere from this facility-One (1) location only divided by % 12. For office space o\VIled and used by a corporation newly domiciled in Florida: a. Date of incorporation in Florida: January 13.1999. 6 ~ ....., b. Number of Full-time employees at this location: 405 full time equivalent employees 13. Ifrequesting an exemption due to location in a slum or blighted area, please furnish such additional information as required by the Board of County Commission or Property Appraiser: ~ I hereby request the adoption of an ordinance granting an exemption from ad valorem taxation on the above property pursuant to Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes as incorporated by Ordinance No. 92-24 St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances. I agree to furnish such other reasonable infonnation as the Board of County Commissioners or the Property Appraiser may request in regard to the exemption requested herein. I hereby certify that the infonnation and valuation stated above by me is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. (If prepared by someone other than the taxpayer, his declaration is based on all information of which he has any knowledge.) . QVC ST. LUCIE, INC. DATE: ()ÆÞtþ: j.l .. SIGNED:Æ>c¿ì ::d ;~:t'l td Diana Beard DEAN, MEAD, MINTON & ~ SIGNED: ~ it. ~ Robert N. em, Esq., VIce PresIdent TITLE: General Mana~er 1903 South 25th Street, Suite 200 Fort Pierce. Florida 34937 (preparer's Address) (561) 464-7700: Fax: (561) 464-7877 (preparer's Telephone Number) 7 · '-" 'WI PROPERTY APPRAISER'S USE ONLY 1. Total revenue available to the county or municipality for the current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources: $73,330,031. 98 2. Revenue lost to the county or municipality for the current fiscal year by virtue of exemptions previously granted under this section: ··$44,608.19 3. Estimate of the revenue which would be lost to the country or municipality during the current fiscal year if the exemption applied for were granted had the property for which the exemption is requested otherwise been subject to taxation: $54,178.23 4. Estimate of the taxable value lost to the county if the exemption applied for were granted: $6,124,810. 5. Estimated number of St. Lucie County residents to be employed in county: Improvements to real property $ 2 , 196 , 100. Personal Property $ 3 , 928, 7 10. 6. I have detennined that the property listed above meets the definition, as defined by Section 196.012(15) or (16), Florida Statutes, as incorporated by Ord. No. 92-24, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances as a New Business XX , as Expansion of an Existing business , or Neither 7. Last year for which exemption may be applied: DATE: 5/26/2000 SIGNED: RETURN TO BE FILED NOT LATER THAN l\'IARCH 1 F:\DATA\RNK\QVC\ad valorem tax exe appl.wpd 8 ... '-' """" Exhibit "A" A parcel ofland lying in Section 26, Township 36 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, being more particularly described as follows: Lots 1,2 and 3, ofSt. Lucie West Plat No. 69, as recorded in Plat Book 35, Pages 14, 14A and 14B, of the Public Records ofSt. Lucie County, Florida. 9 ~ '-'AGENDA REQUEST ITE:)-.INO. ~Ç) ~ DATE: July 18, 2000 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application - Orchid Island Juice Company- Ordinance No. 00-28. BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Ordinance No. 00-28 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: ../ o glas Anderson unty Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 '-' '" INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 00-1011 DATE: July?, 2000 SUBJECT: 2000 Economic Development Exemption Application - Orchid Island Juice Company ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: On October 6,1992, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 92-24 establishing a program to exempt certain new and expanding businesses from ad valorem taxation as allowed by state law, a copy of which is attached. The ordinance was adopted subject to a referendum held on November 3, 1992 which passed. Also attached is a copy of Resolution No. 92-264 adopted on October 20, 1992 establishing a property tax exemption phase out schedule and a property tax exemption eligibility rate schedule for new or expanding businesses. Attached is an application filed by Orchid Island Juice Company. As required by state law, the application was forwarded to the St. Lucie County Property Appraiser for review. The comments and findings of the Property Appraiser are contained in the application. As the memorandum states, Orchid Island Juice Company submitted the required information and met the statutory definition of a expanding business. The Property Appraiser's estimate of the taxable value lost to the County if the exemption is granted is $167,980. The Property '-' ...." Appraiser's estimate of revenue which would be lost to the County during the current fiscal year if the exemption were granted is $1,485.90. The application reflects that as a result of the expansion, 15 St. Lucie County residents will be employed by Orchid Island Juice Company in addition to the 75 residents employed before the expansion. Under the property tax eligibility chart, it appears that Orchid Island Juice Company would receive a seven (7) year exemption, phased as follows: Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 100 'Yo 90 'Yo 80 'Yo 70 'Yo 60'Yo 40 'Yo 20'Yo Also attached is a copy of draft Ordinance No. 00-28 which, if adopted, would grant Orchid Island Juice Company an economic ad valorem tax exemption for a period of seven years. Permission to advertise was granted on June 27,2000. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Ordinance No. 00-28 as drafted. Respectfully submitted, DSM/ caf Attachments . ~ s '-" -'" ORDINANCE NO. 92-24 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1-19.3 (TAXATION) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY CREATING ARTICLE V (ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTIONS) RELATING TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE COUNTY; ESTABLISHING AN EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAXATION FOR CERTAIN NEW AND EXPANDING BUSINESS PROPERTIES; PROVIDING DEFINITIONS AND REQUIREMENTS; PROVIDING PROCEDURES FOR APPLICATION FOR EXEMPTION; SPECIFYING DUTIES OF THE PROPERTY APPRAISER IN CONNECTION. WITH SUCH PROPERTY; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY; FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; EFFECTIVE DATE; ADOPTION; AND CODIFICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes, provides the Board of County Commissioners may hold a referendum granting Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions under Section 3, Article VII of the State Constitution. 2. This Board believes that amending Chapter 1-19.3 (Taxation) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, .. by creating Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions for a new or expanding business is in the best interest of the health, safety and public welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: btruck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 1 ::d"r C,.¡ CD ~·o ()f-':Þ o CD ::3 Ii ::3 o.ZCD ~~~ CDf-' o~~ f-' =' I ...¡ t; -ln I to., f-' \D LV CD WN~ 010 ~~HI "fY\rt lJ1W::T oÞoO\CD :Þ n . ~. 3: Ii . () o¡:: ::d ~. rt tJj on 00 x¡:: Ii rt 01 ())C/) N~ Wt'" ¡:: () 1-" "'dCD :Þ øn tTJO ¡:: ::3 NQ" 0\ o o '-" """" PART A. AMENDMENT OF CHAPTER 1-19.3 (TAXATION) OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. Chapter 1-19.3 (Taxation) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, is hereby amended by creating Article V (Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions) to read as follows: Chapter 1-19.3 TAXATION ARTICLE V. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ÄD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTIONS Section 1-19.3-51. Short Title. This Ordinance shall be known as County Ordinance No. 92-24, "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Requlations of St. Lucie County, Florida." Section 1-19.3-52. . Enactment and Authoritv. Pursuant to Section 3, Article VII of the State Constitution and in accordance with Chapters 125, 163, 192, 196 and 214, Florida Statutes and Florida Department of Revenue Rules, Chapter 12D-7, Florida Administrative Code, incorporated municipalities and counties individually or In combination are authorized and empowered to adopt, amend or revise and enforce an ordinance relating to economic development ad valorem tax exemptions, after the electors of such municipality or county, votinq on the question in a referendum, authorize the adoption of such ordinance. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 2 o ~ ~ o o ~ o Q) N lù "tJ :Þ G) tr N 0\ o ~ "-' .."" .Section 1-19.3-53. Jurisdiction. The area subiect to this Ordinance shall be incorporated and unincorporated St. Lucie County. Section 1-19.3-54. Purpose and Intent. The public health, safety, comfort, economy, order, convenience and qeneral welfare require the harmonious, orderlvand proqressive development of new business and expansion of existing business within Florida and its incorporated municipalities and counties. In furtherance of this qeneral purpose counties by Chapters 125, 163, 192, 196 and 214, Florida Statutes and Florida Department of Revenue Rules, Chapter 12D-7, Florida Administrative Code, are authorized and empowered to adopt, amend or revise and enforce measures relatinq to economic development ad valorem tax exemptions for new business and expansion of existinq business. It is the intent' of this Ordinance to secure or to ensure: ~ The establishment of criteria for qrantinq such exemptions to certain types of businesses or industries or for denvinq exemptions on a rational, nonarbitrarv, nondiscriminatory basis bv the Board of County Conunissioners. ~ No precedent shall be implied or inferred bv the qrantinq of an exemption to a new or expandinq business. Applications for exemptions shall be considered bv the Board of Count v Conunissioners on a case-bv-case basis for each application, after consideration of the Property Appraiser's report on that application. l....:.. Anv exemption qranted shall appl v up to one hundred percent (100%) of the assessed value of all improvements to real property made bv or for the use of a new business and all tanqible personal property of such new business, or up to one hundred percent (100%) of the assessed value of all added improvements to real property which additions are made to facilitate the expansion of an Struc]c through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 3 o ::n tJ: o o ~ o OJ N W 't :Þ ø [t:I N 0\ o N '-" --' existinq business and of the net increase in all tanqible personal property acquired to facilitate such expansion of an existinq business. L. Any exemption shall be up to a full ten (10) year period from the time the exemption is qranted. ~ No exemptIon shall be qrantedon the land which new or expanded businesses are to be located. b. No exemption shall be qranted on school or water manaqement district taxes, or on taxes levied for pavrnent of bonds or taxes authorized a vote of the electors of the County pursuant to Sections 9 or 12, Article VII, of the State Constitution. Section 1-19.3-55. Definition of Terms. The followinq words, phrases and terms shall have the same .. meaninqs attributed to them in current Florida Statutes and the Florida Administrative Code, except where the context clearly indicates otherwise: 1.:.. Applicant - Any person or corporation submittinq an Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption application to the Board. ~ Board - The St. Lucie County Board of Commissioners. .h. Business Any activity enqaqed in by any person, corporation or company with the obiect of private or public qa1.n, benefit, or advantaqe, either direct or indirect. 3.1 New Business - ~ A business establishinq 10 or more ;obs to employ 10 or more full-time employees in this County, which manufactures, processes, Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 4 o ::n tJ: o o :;¡;: o Q) tv W "0 :Þ G) tt:I tv 0\ o W '-" '..J compounds, fabricates, or produces for sale items of tanqible personal property at a fixed location and which comprises an industrial or o ~ ro o o ~ manufacturinq plant: h A business establishinq 25 or more jobs to employ 25 or more full-time employees in this County, the sales factor of which, as defined o ()) tv by s. 220.15 (5), Florida Statutes, for the Lù facility with respect to which it requests an '1j :Þ ø [r economic development ad valorem tax exemption is less than '0.50 for each year the exemption 1.S claimed. No business enqaqed in retail tv 0\ o ~ operations as defined herein shall be eliqible for an exemption pursuant to this subsection b: or ~ An office space in this state owned and used by a cor?oration newly domiciled in this County: provided such office space houses 50 or full-time such employees of more corporation: provided that such business or office .first beqins operation on a site clearly separate from any other commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 5 3.2 '-'" ...." fh Any business located in an area desiqnated enterprise zone that first beqins operation on a site clearly separate from any other commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. Expansion of Existinq Business ª-=- A business establishinq 10 or more iobs to employ 10 or more full-time employees in this County, which manufactures, processes, compounds, fabricates, or produces for sale items of tanqible personal property at a fixed location and which comprises an industrial or manufacturinq plant: or ~ Any business establishinq 25 or more iobs to employ 25 or more full-time employees in this County, the sales factor of which, as defined by s.220.15(5), Florida Statutes, for the facility with respect to which it requests an economic development ad valorem tax exemption is less than 0.50 for each vear the exemption is claimed provided that such business increases operations on a site colocated with a commercial or industrial operation owned bv the same business, resultinq in a net increase in employment of not less than 10 percent or Struc]c through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 6 o :x1 0:1 o o :,;: o m N W '" :Þ G) [T tv '" o 01 '-" """" an increase in productive output of not less than 10 percent. No business enqaqed in retail operations as defined herein shall be eliqible for an exemption pursuant to this subsection b. ~ Any business located in an enterprise zone that increases operations on a site colocated with a commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. 3.3 Business enqaqed in retail operations _ a business en a ed in a sale to a consumer or to an e~son of an item of tanqible personal property for any purposes other than for resale. ~ Department - The Florida Department of Revenue. ~ Im rovements - Ph sical chan es made to raw land and structures placed on or under the land surface. All ersonal to facilitate an ex ansion of an existin business rovided that the ersonal is added or increased on or after the day the ordinance is adopted. However, personal uired to re lace existin shall not be considered to facilitate a businesses expansion. ~ Sales Factor - A fraction the numerator of which is the total sales of the taxpayer in this state durinq the Struc]c through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 7 o ~ to o o ~ o Q) N W 'U ;Þ ø [X1 N 0\ o 0\ '-" ..." taxable year or period and the denominator of which is the total sales of the taxpayer everywhere durinq the taxable year or period. (See Section 220.15(5), Florida Statutes for specifics of computation). Section 1-19.3-56. General. The Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption is a local o tion tax incentive for new or business which ma be qranted or refused at the sole discretion of the Board. To apply for such an exemption a business locatinq or expandinq in the cor orated or unincor orated area of St".Lucie Count must file an application (Florida Department of Revenue Form DR-418-..- See Attachment 1) with the Board. Satisfactory proof that the business meets the criteria for exem tion as a new business or ex ansion of an existin business as defined by this Ordinance must accompany the Application. The Application shall be filed on or before 1 March of the year in which an exemption is requested. Exemption from County tax may only be qranted by the Board. The exemption qranted under this Ordinance shall not accrue to improvements to real property made by or for the use of new or businesses when such im rovements have been included on the tax rolls prior to the referendum authorizinq this Ordinance. Section 1-19.3-57. Procedure. Before the Board acts on an application, it must be submitted to the Property Appraiser for review. After careful consideration, 8truc]( through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 8 o ::t! txJ o o ~ o (» N W '1: :Þ ø tr1 N 0\ o ~ ":'!;': ';: '-' -...I the raiser shall re ort to the Board concernin the fiscal impact of qrantinq exemptions. The Property Appraiser's Report shall include the following: 1....:.. The total revenue available to the County for the current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources. ~ The amount of revenue foreqone by the County for the current fiscal year because of economic development ad valorem tax exemptions previously qranted. 2:.. . An estimate of the amount of revenue which would be foreqone for the current fiscal year if the exemption is qranted to the new or expandinq business. .L.. A determination that the business meets the definition of a new or expandinq business as defined in this Ordinance Upon request, the Department will provide the Property A raiser such information as it ma have avail Ie to assist in makinq this determination. the After consideration of the report of the Property Appraiser, Board may choose to adopt an Ordinance qrantinq the tax exem tion to a business. The Ordinance shall be ado ted in the same manner as an other ordinance of the Count . The Ordinance shall include the followinq information: 1....:.. The name and address of the new or expandinq business. ~ The amount of revenue available from ad valorem tax sources for the current fiscal Year, revenue foreqone for the current fiscal year because of economic development ad valorem tax exemptions currently in effect, and the amount of estimated revenue which ',·:ould be foreaone because of the exemption qranted to th~ new or expanding business. 2:.. The expiration date of the exemption. (Up to ten years from date of Board adoption of the Ordinance qrantinq the exemption) .L.. A findinq that the business meets the definition of a new business or an expansion of an existinq business. £truc]c through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 9 o ::u tJ: o o ,;: o Q) N W "0 :Þ G) tr1 N m o Q) '-' ...",.I ~ The Board's authori tv to revoke an exemption if the business no lonqer satisfies the criteria for the exemption. Section 1-19.3-58. Fees. Fees charqed to offset the cost of processinq the Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Application or any Exemption Ordinance shall be adopted bv the Board bv resolution. Section 1-19.3-59. E1iqib1e Business or Industrv. Anv business or industry, as defined in Section 1-19.3-55, Paraqraph 3.1 and 3.2, that does not qualify as an ineliqible business or industry as defined in Section 1-19.3-60. When considerinq the issue of whether or not a busiQess or industry is an eliqible business as defined herein, the Board shall consider the anticipated number of employees, averaqe waqe, type of industry or business, environmental impacts, volume of business or production or any other information· relatinq to the issue of whether the proposed development would siqnificantlv improve economic development in St. Lucie County prior to acceptinq the Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Application. The criteria for determininq the lenqth of an exemption and the percentaqe amount of an exemption may be formulated bv the Board bv resolution. The criteria shall provide for incentives for businesses that employ St. Lucie County residents who establish permanent domicile pursuant to Florida Statutes. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 10 o ::tj D::J o o ~ o Q) N W 'U ::to ø [Ij tv 0\ o \D '-' wi . Section 1-19.3-60. Ine1iqible Business or Industry. Anv business or industry in violation of any federal, state, or local law or requlation qoverninq environmental matters such as air, water, and noise pollution. Section 1-19.3-61. Appeals. The decision of the Board not to qrant an Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption to a particular business or industry is subiect only to iudicial review pursuant to the Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure. Section 1-19.3-62 - 1-19.3-70. Reserved. PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, and adopted prior to January 1, 1969, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 11 o ~ txJ o o ~ o Q) N W '0 :Þ ø [t] tv (7\ -1 o '-' wi PART D. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304. PART E. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Ordinance shall take effect only upon approval by the voters on November 3, 1992 of the ballot question authorized by the Board in Resolution No. 92-175. PART F. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Jim Minix AYE Vice Chairman Jack Krieger AYE Commissioner Judy Culpepper AYE Commissioner Havert L. Fenn AYE Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner AYE PART G. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, and the word ""ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that parts B to G shall not be codified. Struck through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 12 o ::d t:J: o o ~ o CO N W '1:1 :Þ GJ tI1 N 0\ ~ ~ '- -' PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 6th day of October, 1992. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIp~~RS'\,: ST. LUCIE COUNTY ,FLORID1\. . :: (2__)~.\ ~ 1 CHAIRMAN .' "j \. . ':. ¡ '; /,--) .. o,J I . l~ - . :.. Struc]c through passages are deleted. added. Underlined passages are 13 '. " o ::0 tJ: o o ~ o CD N W "t1 :Þ G) tI1 tv (j\ -I N ~ J Douglas Dixon, Î-~rk of the Circuit Court - ·t. Lucie County Fi Ie Number: ]\....i 11 7 1 7' OR BOOK 0....,13 PAGE 03 5 7 Recorded: 10-27=92 02:43 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 92-264 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION PHASE OUT SCHEDULE AND PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION ELIGIBILITY RATE SCHEDULE FOR NEW OR EXPANDING BUSINESS APPLYING FOR AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 92-24 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. On September 8, 1992, this Board adopted Resolution 92- 175 which implemented the provisions of Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes which authorized the Board of County Commissioners the authority to call a referendum on the issue of granting a local Option Economic Ad Valorem Tax Exemption. 2. On October 6, 1992, this Board adopted Ordinance No. 92- 24, which amended Chapter 1-19.3 (TAXATION) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, by creating Article V - Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption. Enactment of Ordinance No. 92-24 ~s contingent on a majority vote in the November referendum election. 3. Section 1-19.3-59 (Eligibility Business or Industry) of Ordinance No. 92-24 provides for the formulation of criteria for determining the length of an exemption and the percentage amount of an exemption pursuant to resolution of this Board. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board hereby adopts the Property Tax Exemptions Phase Out Schedule and Property Tax Eligibility Chart, attached 1 - 'w .".I hereto and referred to collectively as "Exhibit A," for purposes of establishing eligibility of a tax exemption for new or expanding businesses pursuant to Ordinance No. 92-24. 2. This Board shall provide incentives for businesses to employ St. Lucie County residents. These incentives shall be the following: a) If a business can verify after the first year of exemption that sixty percent (60%) of its full-time employees have been St. Lucie County residents for at least six (6) months prior to employment then said business shall be entitled to one additional year from the standard exemption as set forth on "Exhibit A." b) If a business can verify after the first year of exemption that eighty percent (80%) of its full-time employees have been st. Lucie County residents for at least six (6) months prior to employment then said business shall be entitled to two additional years from the standard exemption as set forth on "Exhibit A." 3. The Board shall have the discretion to modify the eligibility requirements based on other significant factors including, but not limited to, the following: a) The increase in local employment attributable to the new or expanding business; b) The unemployment and underemployment of the available local labor force and the types and wages of jobs created therein; c) The amount of capital investment purchased by the new or expanding business; d) The ability of the county to otherwise meet its total fiscal needs should the requested exemption be granted; e) The cost of any increased local government services, including but not limited to roads, water, sewer, gas and law enforcement, and other direct expenditures associated with that specific business. 2 o ::a t:O o o '" o CO ~ lù 'i:I > C) t%1 o lù 01 CO '-' ...I After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Jim Minix AYE Vice Chairman Jack Krieger AYE Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner AYE Commissioner Havert L. Fenn AYE Commissioner Judy Culpepper AYE PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 20th day of October, 1992. ATTEST: , BOARD OF COUNTY COMMI~IONERS,' ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FL~RIDÄ By: ct ch:~4 '/ - YìtiÆ~~Y;:Q ~ DfY):t!t!ý; ~Cl b~~~ ~,. '1::-- .....~".7:""'Y"" "" ~ (~~., ,..,.. i.~'.;,.~ ..........,.'"¡-~ ,~~~ '- .~ ..- 'J ' ~~~. '~~ ~.;:... t ..'l};......._ \ .J- '... .... ... I ~#: "~.' , "I .-(', I 1-'::"':; ~ , -: .".", , -#,1> ' ~! ¡ ~_..... ,--' "':".' ~ ':;4 ~}~,.,~~f~~t:)9 ~~ t.....#. _""""',,' .. .Þ;):/ ~~~.~;::~~~~~~~~-p .~:. . oJ .11. , ji} ; '.:¡ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND . CORRECTNESS: 0 likf- tlv?< County Attorn~y / ./ / _/ 3 o ::tI t:Ø o o '" o CD ~ lù "C :Þ C) t%] o Lù tJ1 I,() '-' ..." PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION ELIGIBILITY ELIGIBILITY (number of years) NUMBER OF STANDARD 60% SLC 80% SLC EMPLOYEES EXEMPTION RESIDENTS RESIDENTS 10 - 24 5- 6 7 25 - 49 6 7 8 50 - 99 7 8 9 100 - 199 8 9 10 200 + (DISCRETION OF COMMISSION) L~ss than five (5) years is left to the discretion of the Board. "EXHIBIT A" o :::0 t::1 o o à o CD ~ lù '"C > C) M o lù 0\ o . ST. LUCIE crYINTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMi' "SSIONERS ECONOMIC DEVELO~ENT AD VALOREM TAX EX£M~ON APPLICATION Ordinance No. 92-24. St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances, Chapter 196, Florida Statutes To be filed with the Board of County CommissionersofSt. Lucie County, Florida, no later than March I of the year the exemption is desired to take effect. Please attach additional infonnation, if necessary or requested. 1. Business Name and Mailing Address: Orchid Island Juice Company 330 North US Highway One Fort Pierce, FL 34950 2. Please give name and telephone number of Owner or Person in Charge of this business: Name: Marygrace Sexton Telephone Number: 561-465-1122 3. Exact Location (Legal Description and Stieet Address) of Property for which this return IS filed: 801 Edward's Road Fort Pierce, FL 34950 4. Date you began, or will begin, business at this facility: October 1999 Description of the improvements to real property for wruch this exemption' is requested: Addition of Cold Storage and Production Facility 5. a_ b. Date of commencement of construction of improvements: Octob~r 1999 6. a. DeScription of the tangible personal property for which this exemption is requested and date when \(roperty was, or is to be, purchased: ------ . Taxpayer's APPRAISER'S Estimate. .- Taxpayer's USE Date of Estimate of ONLY of Original Condition Fair Market Class ofItem Age Purchase Cost Good Avg. Poor Value Condition . '-" ..I b. Average Value of Inventory on hand: Nnr y~t determined c. Any additional personal property not listed above for which an exemption is claimed must be returned on form DR -405 (Tangible Personal Property tax Return) and a copy attached to this form. 7. Do you desire exemption as a: "New Business" or as an -1L.. "Expansion of an Existing Business" 8. Describe the Type or Nature of Your Business: Manufacturer of Fresh squeezed citrus 9. Trade Level (Check as many as apply): Wholesale Service Office Other Manufacturing X Professional a. Number of full-time employees to be employed in St. Lucie County, Florida 90 10. b. If an expansion of an existing business: (1) Net increase in Employment 20% (2) Increase in productive output resulting from this expansion ?n~ 11. Sales factor for the facility requesting' exemption: Total sales in Florida from this facility-One (1) location only Total sales everyWhere from this facility-One (1) location only divided by = 12. For offi~ space owned and used by a corporation newly d0!D.iciled in FJorida: a. Date of incorporåtionin Florida: 1990 b. Number of Full-time employees at this location: 75 13. If requesting an exemption due to location in a slum or blighted area, please furnish such' additional information as required by the Board of County Commission or Property Appraiser. 2 , '-' ....,¡ I hereby request the adoption of an ordinance granting an exemption from ad valorem taxation on the above property pursuant to Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes as incorporated by Ordinance No. 92-24, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances. I agree to furnish such other reasonable information as the Board of County Commissioners or the Property Appraiser may request in regard to the exemption requested herein. I hereby certify that the information and valuation stated above by me is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. (If prepared by someone other than the taxpayer, his declaration is based on all i~,~vtion of which be has any knowledge.) DATE:, 2/29/2000 SIGNED: t /Zæ,;-h:~ . ~ '. (Preparer) - SIGNED: ~ 330 North US Highway One (Taxpayer) (preparer's Address) TITLE: CEO 561-465-1122 (Preparer's Telephone Number) PROPERTY APPRAISER'S USE ONLY 1. Total revenue available to the county or muniCipality for the current fiscal year from ad valorem. tax sources: $76,330,031. 98 Revenue lost to the county or municipality for the current fiscal year by virtue of exemptions previously granted under this section: $44,608. 19 Estimate of the revenue which would be lost to the county or municipality during the current fiscal year if the exemption applied" for were granted had the property for which the exemption is requested otherwise been subject to taxation:' $1 , 485. 90 2. 3. Estimate of the taxable value lost to the county if the exemption applied for were granted: $167,980. Estimated number of St. Lucie County residents to be employed in county: Improvements to real property 0 Personal Property $167,980. I have detennined that the property listed above meets the definition, as defined by Section 196.0 12( 15) or (16), Florida Statutes, as incorporated by Ord. No. 92-24, St. Lucie County Code of Or~inances as a New Business , as Expansion of an Existing business xx, or Neither Last year for which exemption may be applied: 2009 4. 5. 6. 7. DATE: 5-26-2000 SIGNED: ~d/i~; ~ RETURN TO BE FILED NOT LATER THAN MARCH 1 .., .) r '-' ."", GENERAL INFORMATION Under the constitutional amendment passed by the voters of Florida on October 7, 1980, tax exemptions can be granted to new and expanding businesses only after the voters of a city and/or county vote in a referendum to allow exemptions for that city or county. Section 196.1995, Florida Statutes, requires that a referendum be held if: (I) The Board of County Commissioners or governing authority of a municipality (city or county commission) votes· to hold such a referendum, or (2) if the county or city commission receives a petition signed by ten percent of the registered voters of the county or city.. This referendum question can then be placed before the voters of a city or county at any regular election or special election called for voting on the tax incentive referendum or for any other purpose. On September 1, 1992, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County (Board) voted to place the question of an Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption of the November 3, 1992 ballot which passed with a majority vote. Thereafter, the Board adopted Ordinance No. 92-24 establishing general guidelinesconceming the exemption and Resolution No. 92-264 establishing an eligibility rate schedule. A company must first meet the definitions of a new or expanding business: New Business . (a) A.business establishing 10 or more jobs to employ 10 or more full-time employees in this County, which manufactures, processes, compounds, fabricates, or produces for sale items of tangible personal property at a fixed location and which comprises an industrial or manufacturing plant; or (b) A business establishing 25 or more jobs to employ 25 or more full-time employees in this County, the sales factor of which, as defined by Section 220.15(5), Florida Statutes, for the facility with respect to which it requests an economic development ad valorem tax exemption is less than 0.50 for each year the exemption is claimed. No business engaged in retail operations as defmed herein shall be eligible for an exemption pursuant to this subsection (b); or (c) An office space in this state owned and used by a corporation newly domiciled in this County; provided such office space houses 50 or more full-time employees of such corporation; provided that such business or o1?ce first begins operation on a site clearly separate from any other commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. (d) Any business located in an area designated enterprise zone that first begins operation on a site clearly separate from any other commercial·or industrial operation owned by the same business. (The above are applicable if the business is on a site clearly separate from any other facility owned by the same company.) Expansion of an Existing Business (a) A business establishing "10 or more jobs to employ 10 or more full-time employees in the County, which manufactures, processes, compounds, fabricates, or produces for sale items of tangible personal property at a fixed location and which comprises an industrial or manufacturing plant; o~ (b) Any business establishing 25 or more jobs to employ 25 or more full-time employees in this County, the sales factor of which, as defined by Section 220.15(5), Florida Statutes, for the facility with respect to which it requests an economic development ad valorem tax exemption is less than 0.50 for each year the exemption is 4 '-' ....", claimed; provided that such business increases operations on a site collocated with a commercial or industrial . operation owned by the same business, resulting in a net increase in employment of not less than 10 percent or an increase in producti ve output of not less than 10 percent. No business engaged in retail operations as defined herein shall be eligible for an exemption pursuant to this subsection (b). (c) Any business located in an enterprise zone that increases operations on a site collocated with a commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. A "business engaged in retail operations" shall be defined as a business engaged in a sale to a consumer 0 to any person of any item of tangible personal property for any purpose other than for resale If a business meets on of the above definitions as a new or expanding businèss, it must then file this application with the county commission. After the county commission receives this application, it will submit the application to the. county property appraiser for review. After the property appraiser makes the report as to the fiscal impact of granting the exemption, the county or city commission shall then adopt an ordinance in the usual manner-granting the exemption, if it chooses to do so. A business cannot receive exemption from school taxes or water management district taxes. Also, a business must pay taxes that were voted by the voters of a city or county to pay for bond issues and other special tax levies authorized by the voters of a city or county. The exemption can omy before the improvements to the real· property and for tangible personal property. The land on which the new or expanding business is to be located will still be taxed and taxes must be paid on it. . The action taken by the county commission can omy exempt the taxes paid to that governmental body. Therefore, the county can omy exempt its taxes. All other taxes must be paid. This exemption shall first apply to the 1993 assessment rolls. DEFINITIONS Section 196.011 (1), Florida Statutes - Failure to make application by March 1 of any year shall constitute a waiver of the exemption for that year. Section 196.012(15) and (16), Florida Statutes, (15) "New business" means: (a) 1. A business establishing 10 or more jobs to employ 10 or more full-time employees in this County, which manufactures, processes, compounds, fabricates, or produces for sale items of tangible personal property at a fixed location and which comprises and industrial or manufacturing plant; or 2. . Any business establishing 25 or more jobs to employ 25 or more full-time employees in this County, the sales factor of which, as defined by Section 220.15(5), Florida Statutes, for the facility with respect to which it requests an economic development ad valorem tax exemption is less than 0.50 for each year the exemption is claimed. No business engaged in retail operations as defined herein shall be eligible for an exemption; or 3. An office space in this state owned and used by a corporation newly domiciled in this county provided such office space houses 50 or more full time employees of such corporation; provided that such business or office first begins operation on a site clearly separate from any other commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business; or 4. Any business located in an area designated enterprise zone that first begins operation on a site clearly separate from any other commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. 5 5. Any business locat':tin an area designated a slum or bligh~ area pursuant to Section 163.3·~5, Florida Statutes. For the purpose of this section, the term slum area or blighted area shall have the same meaning as in Sections 163.340(7) and (8), Florida Statutes. (16) '<Expansion of an existing business" means: (a) I. A business establishing 10 or more jobs to employ 10 or more full-time employees in this County, which manufactures, processes, compounds, fabricates, or produces for sale items of tangible personal property at a fixed location and which comprises an industrial or manufacturing plant; or 2. Any business establishing 25 or more jobs to employ 25 or more full-time employees in this County, the sales factor of which, as defined by Section 220.15(5), Florida Statutes, for the facility with respect to .which it requests an economic development ad valorem tax exemption is less than 0.50 for each year the exemption is claimed; . provided that such business increases operations on a site collocated with a commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business, resulting in a net increase in employment of not less than 10 percent or an increase in productive output of not less than 10 percent. (b) Any business located in an enterprise zone that increases operations on a site collocated with a commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. Section 220.15(5), Florida Statutes - "Sales Factor" (5) The sales factor" is a fraction, the numerator of which is the total sales of the taxpayer in this state· during the taxable year or period and the denominator of which is the total sales of the taxpayer everywhere during the taxable year or period. (a) As used in this subsection, the tenn "sales" means all gross receipts of the taxpayer except interest, dividends, rents, royalties, redemption, or other disposition of securities. However: 1. Rental income included in the tenn if a significant portion of the taxpayer's business consists of leasing or renting real or tangible personal property; and 2. Royalty income is included in the tenn if a significant portion of the taxpayer's business consists of dealing in or with the production, exploration or development of minerals. (b) 1. Sales of tangible personal property occur in this state if the property is delivered or shipped to a purchaser within this state, regardless of the f.o.b. point, other conditions of the sale, or ultimate destination of the property, unless shipment is made via a common or contract carrier. 2. When citrus fruit is delivered by a cooperative for a grower-member, by a grower-member to a cooperative, or by a grower-participant to a Florida processor, the sales factor for the growers for such citrus fruit delivered to such processor shall be the same as the sales factor for the most recent taxable year of that processor, shall be furnished on the request of such a grower promptly after it has been detennined for that taxable year. 3. Reimbursement o~ expenses under an agency contract between a cooperative, a grower-member of a cooperative, or a grower and a processor is not a sale within this state. (c) Sales of a financial organization, including, but not limited to, banking and savings institutions, investment companies, real estate investment trusts, and brokerage companies, occur in this state if derived from: 6 ': '-' """'" 1. Fees, commissioners, or other compensation for financial services rendered within this state; 2. Gross profits from trading in stocks, bonds, or other securities managed within this state; 3. Interest received within this state, other than interest from loans secured by mortgages, deeds of trust, or other liens upon real or tangible personal property located without this state, and dividends received within this state; 4. Interest charged to customers at places of business maintained within this state for carrying debit balances of margin accounts, without deduction of any costs incurred in carrying such accounts; 5. Interest, fees, commissioners, or other charges or gains from loans secured by mortgages, deeds of trust, or other liens upon real or tangible personal property located in this state or from installment sale agreements originally executed by a taxpayer or his agent to sell real or tangible personal property located in this state; 6. Rents from real or tangible personal property located in this state; or 7. Any other gross income, including other interest, resulting from the operation as a financial organization within this state. In computing the amounts under this paragraph, any amount received by a member of an affiliated group (determined under s_ 1504( a) of the Internal Revenue Code but without refere~ce to whether any such corporation is an "includable corporation" under s. 1504(b) of the Internal Revenue Code) from another member of such group shall be included only to the extent such amount exceeds expenses of the recipient directly related thereto. Section 220.15(6), Florida Statutes - "Financial Organization" (6) The term "[mancial organization," as used in this section, includes any bank, trust company, savings bank, industrial bank, land bank, safe-deposit company, private banker, savings and loan association, credit union, cooperative bank, small loan company, sales finance company, or investment compar¡y. Revised 1/14/00 (g:\atty\blnkfonn\ccodcv-advalorem) 7 ,. '-' .....,¡ '-' ....., ORDINANCE NO. 00-28 AN ORDINANCE RELATING TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, TO ENCOURAGE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT IN THE COUNTY ; ESTABLISHING AN EXEMPTION FROM CERTAIN AD VALOREM TAXATION FOR ORCHID ISLAND JUICE COMPANY, 330 NORTH US HIGHWAY ONE, FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA, AN EXPANDING BUSINESS; PROVIDING THE AMOUNT OF REVENUE AVAILABLE FROM AD V ALOREM TAX SOURCES FOR THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR AND THE AMOUNT OF ESTIMATED REVENUE FROM THE CURRENT FISCAL YEAR WHICH WOULD BE LOST BECAUSE OF THE EXEMPTION GRANTED TO ORCHID ISLAND JUICE COMPANY; PROVIDING AN EXPIRATION DATE OF THE EXEMPTION FROM THE DATE ON BOARD ADOPTION OF THIS ORDINANCE; PROVIDING A FINDING THAT ORCHID ISLAND JUICE COMPANY MEETS THE DEFINITION OF AN EXPANDING BUSINESS; PROVIDING A SEVERABILITY CLAUSE; PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE BE IT ORDAINED BY THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA: ARTICLE I Short Title This Ordinance shall be known as County Ordinance No. 00-28 "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption - Orchid Island Juice Company. '-' ....., ARTICLE II Procedure After consideration of the report of the Property Appraiser and in accordance with the procedure set forth in County Ordinance 92-24, "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Regulations of St. Lucie County, Florida", the Board grants and establishes an exemption from ad valorem taxation of the assessed value of Orchid Island Juice Company, 330 North U.S. Highway One, Fort Pierce, Florida, in accordance with the following exemption phase out schedule: Year 1 (Fiscal Year 2000-01) Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Year 7 100 'Yo 90% 80 'Yo 70% 60'Yo 40 'Yo 20% No exemption shall be granted on the land on which improvements are made by Orchid Island Juice Company. ARTICLE III Ad V alorem Tax Revenues Total revenues are available to the County for the current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources is $76,330,031.98. Revenues lost to the County for the current fiscal year by ad valorem tax exemptions under this section currently in effect are $44,608.19. Revenues to be lost by granting of this exemption for the current fiscal year are estimated to be $1,485.90. '- """'" ARTICLE IV Expiration Date The Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption granted to Orchid Island Juice Company, an expanding business shall be for seven (7) years from the date of Board adoption of this Ordinance. ARTICLE V Finding The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, finds that Orchid Island Juice Company is an expanding business as defined by St. Lucie County Ordinance No. 92-24 and Section 196.012(16), Florida Statutes. The Board reserves the right to repeal the exemption if Orchid Island Juice Company no longer satisfies the criteria set out above. ARTICLE VI Severability If any section, subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause, phrase, or portion of this Ordinance is for any reason found void, invalid, unlawful, or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such portion shall be deemed a separate, distinct, independent, and severable provision and such holding shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. '-" """", ARTICLE VII Effective Date This Ordinance shall take effect upon receipt of notice of filing from the Secretary of State. ARTICLE VIII Adoption After motion and second, the vote on this Ordinance was as follows: Chairman John D. Bruhn XX Vice Chairman Frannie Hutchinson XX Commissioner Doug Coward XX Commissioner Paula Lewis XX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this _ day of ,2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney ., ... ----........ -- ,..., ~ ~ '-" AGENDA REQUEST '-l ITEM NO. SF DATE: JULY 18, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION PRESENTED BY: j\~&~. tM--- (Óonald B. We , P.E. County Engineer SUBJECT: Pine Hollow Subdivision· Street Lighting District Public Hearing BACKGROUND: See Attached Memorandum FUNDS AVAIL. N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: April 4, 2000 - Board granted permission to advertise Public Hearing RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approval of Resolution No. 00-085, Providing for the Creation and Establishment of a Special Street Lighting Improvement District in Pine Hollow Subdivision and authorize the Chairman and County Attorney to execute the resolution. 4-0 (Hutchinson Abstained) uglas M. Anderson ounty Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: ~] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: [X]Finance Dir: )d Øtt-./ ~ Coordination/Sianatures [X] Mgmt & Budget: ~ '--1iJ fY{j [X]Co Eng: ~~. . íl [] Other: [] purchasing: [X]County Attorney: [X] Public Works Dir: [] Other: - '-' ..".; COMMISSION REVIEW: July 18, 2000 ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 00-096 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners County Engine~J'~' April 10, 20~ Pine Hollow Subdivision - Proposed Street Lighting District Public Hearing BACKGROUND Staff has received a petition representing 52% of the property owners within the Pine Hollow Subdivision to create a street lighting district to provide street lighting by FPL. The Pine Hollow subdivision is a residential subdivision comprised of 56 single family lots. The petitioner's signatures have been verified and the limits ofthe proposed district are depicted in the attachments. This petition far exceeds the fifteen (15%) percent concurrence as required by County Ordinance. A general election is also required pursuant to the Ordinance. We have a majority in support of the project, therefore recommend that the Board waive the election requirement for this project. This system would be comprised of eighteen (18) Traditional Luminaires mounted on eighteen (18) fiberglass poles. FPL will require a one-time deposit of $748.00 for this system. Per FPL's Street Lighting Tariff, the monthly charges for this system will be approximately $374.00. This equates to approximately $80.00 to $90.00 per lot per year. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends Board approval of Resolution No. 00-085, Providing for the Creation and Establishment of a Special Street Lighting Improvement District in Pine Hollow Subdivision and authorize the Chairman and County Attorney to execute the resolution. BP cc: Staff Concurring g\wp\stlight\pinehollow\aga-ph1.wpd '-" ....., RESOLUTION NO. 00-85 A RESOLUTION PROVIDING FOR THE CREATION AND ESTABLISHMENT OF A SPECIAL STREET LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS DISTRICT AND THE LEVY OF SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR PINE HOLLOW STREET LIGHTING DISTRICT TO BE DESIGNATED AS "SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 127 OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA" WHEREAS' the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County has made the following determinations: 1. On February 29, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners was presented with a petition pursuant to Section 1-17-17 of the Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County, Florida, requesting the creation of a special street lighting improvements district composed of the area within the hereinafter described boundaries. 2. On March 6, 2000, the County Engineer filed with the Board a report setting forth that there are fifty-six (56) lots within the boundaries of the proposed district and that the owners of twenty-nine (29) lots had signed the petition as verified through Property Appraiser records. 3. The County Administrator has made or caused to be made such surveys and investigations as he deemed necessary and on April 4, 2000, the County Engineer filed with the Board his report setting forth (a) the boundaries of the proposed District, (b) the location of qny improvements to be acquired, leased, or installed, (c) his estimate of the cost of such improvements, and (d) his estimate of the annual expense of operating such improvements and of providing such special services. -1- '-' '-' 4. This Board determined from the report of the County Engineer that the improvements and services petitioned for would be of special benefit to all real property within the proposed district and that the cost of providing such improvements and special services would not be in excess of such special benefits, and accordingly, set a public hearing to be held at the St. Lucie County Administration Annex in Fort Pierce, Florida on Tuesday, July 18,2000 at 7:00 p.m., or as soon thereafter as the matter may be heard, and notice of said public hearing was published in the Tribune at Fort Pierce, Florida, on April 7,2000. 5. Following the above-referenced public hearing, this Board has determined that the petition as submitted for the creation of a special street lighting improvements district and the levy of special assessments for the Pine Hollow Street Lighting District should be granted. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida as follows: 1. That a special street lighting improvement district is hereby provided, for the creation and establishment under authority of Article II of Chapter 1-17 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws, as amended, to be designated as "SPECIAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT NO. 127 OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA". 2. That the boundaries of said District is as follows: Pine Hollow Subdivision Unit One, Lots 1 thru 30, as described in Plat Book 27, Page 11 ,A and Pine Hollow Subdivision Unit Two, Lots 1 thru 26, as described in Plat Book 38, Pages 10 & 10A of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. -2- '-" ~ 3. That the special services to be provided in said district are street lights. 4. That eighteen (18) Traditional Luminaires and necessary poles and underground cable will be installed by lease agreement with Florida Power & Light Company in said district with a deposit in the amount of seven hundred forty eight dollars ($748.00). The estimated total annual cost for service, including energy, maintenance and relamping, will be four thousand four hundred eighty eight dollars ($4,488.00). 5. Said annual cost of service will be financed by the levy of special assessments on all taxable real property in the district on a per lot basis not to exceed eight thousand four hundred dollars ($8,400.00) annually for the first year's assessment and five thousand forty dollars ($5,040.00) annually per year thereafter until such time that the annual assessment will need to be adjusted accordingly to Florida Power & Light Company's monthly rate of billing. 6. That given the fact that the parties which petitioned for the creation of the district equates to a majority of the property owners in the district, and it is apparent, therefore, that an election among the affected property owners to determine whether to create the district would result in an affirmative vote for the creation of the district, it would appear an unnecessary expenditure of monies to conduct an election regarding the creation of the district as provided under Section 1-17-17 (f) of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws. Therefore, this Board has determined that such an election will not be required to create the Pine Hollow Street Lighting District. 7. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. -3- \w' ..,¡ After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman John D. Bruhn Vice-Chairman Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Doug Coward PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 18th day of July, 2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney -4- " '-" AGENDA REQUEST , >...I ITEM NO. 5G DATE: July 18, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DEPT PRESENTED BY: þ\'fl~~- ~ íDonald B. Wes, P.E. County Engineer SUBJECT: Academy Drive M.S.B.U. Initial Public Hearing Potable Water Improvements - FPUA BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: June 13, 2000 - Board accepted petition and granted permission to advertise the Initial Public Hearing RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 00-154 creating the Academy Drive M.S.B.U.; authorizing the County Engineer to proceed with the engineering and design of the Project pursuant to the procedures set forth in Chapter 1-13.5, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances; authorizing the County Engineer to advertise for bids for construction; and to prepare an interlocal agreement with the City of Fort Pierce and the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority. ~] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: NCE: COMMISSION ACTION: .-; [x]Public Works Dir [x ]Finance ~/ ~ coordlnatlOnl~ [x ]Mgt. & Budge & [x ]Co. Eng~ . [ ]Purchasing [x]County Attorney [ ]Other ...... ....,.¡ COMMISSION REVIEW: July 18, 2000 ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM 00-174 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners Donald B. West, County Engineer~~ June 30, 2000 Academy Drive MSBU Initial Public Hearing Potable Water Improvements - FPUA BACKGROUND Property owners on Academy Drive have submitted petitions to St. Lucie County to establish a Municipal Service Benefit Unit (M.S.B.U.) to fund the costs necessary in bringing potable water improvements to their neighborhood. The utilities system would be provided by Fort Pierce Utilities Authority. Four out of eight property owners signed the petition. The four signatures represent existing single family homes whereas three of the other four properties are vacant and one is a rental property. The petition received for potable water represents fifty (50%) percent of the property owners in support of the project yet it also represents 100% of those land owners that reside on Academy Drive. An informal meeting was held on May 17, 2000 to discuss the proposed potable water improvements and conceptual design, the MSBU process, and to provide the residents with a rough estimate of the cost. Based upon the consensus of those at the meeting, the property owners requested that staff proceed to the Initial Public Hearing. Academy Drive is located west of 25th Street and south of Juanita Avenue and lies within the unincorporated limits of the County. Therefore, in order to create the M.S.B.U. for potable water service provided by the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority, the County must first enter into an interlocal agreement with the City of Fort Pierce and the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority. This agreement will establish the FPUA and County's responsibilities with respect to this specific project. Under this agreement, the County agrees to assess the property owners for the municipal improvements provided by the FPUA. The FPUA will be responsible for the design, permitting, and construction of the potable water system, administration of the construction contract, inspection, and final acceptance of the system for maintenance. St. Lucie County will be responsible for the administration of the M.S.B.U.. In addition to the potable water improvements, a fire hydrant will also be installed to meet current fire protection requirements. The method of assessment for the potable water improvements shall be based upon the "Equivalent Residential Connection" (ERC) method, whereas each property owner is assessed equally for the improvements. ....- - - - RECOMMENDATION ~ 'WI Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 00-154 creating the Academy Drive M.S.B.U.; authorizing the County Engineer to proceed with the engineering and design of the Project pursuant to the procedures set forth in Chapter 1-13.5, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances; authorizing the County Engineer to advertise for bids for construction; and to prepare an interlocal agreement with the City of Fort Pierce and the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority. cc: Staff Concurring MSBU Coordinator Tax Collector Property Appraiser - - '-' ...., RESOLUTION NO. 00-154 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, DETERMINING THAT A PROJECT TO PROVIDE POTABLE WATER IMPROVEMENTS TO CERTAIN PROPERTIES ON ACADEMY DRIVE IS IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE COUNTY AND WILL BE OF BENEFIT TO THE PROPERTIES WITHIN A PROPOSED ACADEMY DRIVE MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT; DETERMINING THAT 100% OF THE BENEFITS OF THE PROJECT WILL ACCRUE TO PROPERTIES WITHIN A PROPOSED ACADEMY DRIVE MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT; DETERMINING THAT THE METHOD OF ASSESSMENT FOR THE POTABLE WATER IMPROVEMENTS SHALL BE BASED UPON THE EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION METHOD; DETERMINING THAT THE COST OF THE PROJECT IS NOT IN EXCESS OF THE BENEFIT; CREATING THE ACADEMY DRIVE MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT; RESOLVING THAT 100% OF THE COST OF THE PROJECT SHOULD BE FUNDED BY NON-AD V ALOREM SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS LEVIED ON PROPERTIES WlTIDN THE ACADEMY DRIVE MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT THROUGH AN ASSESSMENT BASED ON AN EQUIV ALENT RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION METHOD OF ASSESSMENT; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING TO PROCEED WITH THE PROJECT AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 125, Florida Statutes and Chapter 1-13.5 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances (the "Code), the Board of County Commissioners for St. Lucie County, Florida (the "Board") has the' authority to establish municipal services benefits units ("MSBU's") in unincorporated St. Lucie County to provide, among other things, drainage improvements and potable water service; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code, the Board has adopted procedures which govern the establishment and administration of such MSBU's; and -1- '-' .....,¡ WHEREAS, on June 13, 2000 pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 1-13.5 of the Code, the Board accepted the petition of 50% of the land owners for potable water improvements within a proposed Academy Drive Municipal Services Benefit Unit (the "Academy Drive MSBU") requesting that the Board create the Academy Drive MSBU to fund the cost of a project to provide potable water improvements to certain properties on Academy Drive in unincorporated St. Lucie County (the "Project"); and WHEREAS, on July 18, 2000 pursuant to the requirements of Section 1-13.5 of the Code, the Board held a duly advertised initial hearing to consider the creation of the Academy Drive MSBU, proof of publication of this hearing is attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A"; and WHEREAS, the County Engineer has advised the Board that based on an analysis of the costs and benefits of the Project, the equivalent residential connection method of assessment is appropriate because this method of assessment fairly and reasonably apportions the cost of the project among the benefitted properties; and WHEREAS, after hearing the comments of the County staff as well as interested persons, the Board has made the following determinations: (1) the Project and the creation of the proposed Academy Drive MSBU is in the best interest of the health, safety and welfare of the County and will be of benefit to the properties within the limits of the proposed Academy Drive MSBU; (2) the percentage of the benefits of the Project which will accrue to properties within the limits of the proposed Academy Drive MSBU as shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit "B" is 100%; (3) the method of assessment to be used in assessing the benefitted properties shall be the equivalent residential connection method; and (4) the cost of the project is not in excess of the benefit gained by each of the properties which would be subject to the proposed assessment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, as follows: Section 1: A municipal services benefit unit to be known as the Academy Drive Municipal Services Benefit Unit is hereby created as shown on the attached Exhibit "B". Section 2: The entire cost of the Project shall be funded through non-ad valorem special assessments levied against real property within the limits of the Academy Drive MSBU. Section 3: The method of assessment shall be based on the equivalent residential connection method of assessment such that each lot owner within the Academy Drive MSBU shall share proportionately in the cost of the Project in relationship to the benefit received. Section 4: The County Director of Engineering is hereby authorized to proceed with the Project pursuant to the procedures set forth in Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code. -2- '-" 'wi Section 5: In the event the Project is not ultimately approved and constructed, the cost of preparing the plans, specifications, and the cost estimates may be assessed against the real property within the Academy Drive MSBU. Section 6. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 18th day of July, 2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney -3- ~ EXHIBIT A PROOF OF PUBLICATION -4- ..."", -- I N ...." ~ ;f. ( ) V) (.II I\) 0..... \0 ..... :r: 110 I ( ) (.II ...." (It Q) I 0 110 fTI 0 0, .... 95 :0 I :Þ 110 I ::::! ()I) ()I) ~ 00 -I 0(.11 (.II 0 Q) I U, -- 70 155 110 Z 0 I 85 75 85 110 I - ... = :::i ............::: ..o~- co - ...." Õ ...." ...." Õ 0\ Õ Õ I o \() <:0 0 õO\o a \() 0 -l>. I 0 75 75 75 85 85 75 85 I (.II I 110 1J6.82 DEVONSHIRE DRIVE CI 00 I 0 0 ~ I ..... 1.11 110 (.II -~ (.II 85 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 Q) 137.33 - = ~ =0) - ... ..... <5 1.11 :::0) - 0'1 Õ 0) :: 0) õ m ¿,. I\) 0 0- oF\) õ~ .t\, 0 1.11 - 1.11 \() co <:0 00 (.II (.II 85 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 85 co 122.73 ()1 137.91 (J1 (.II ~ 137.91 !Ii N ()1 ..... ..... i.. v.: ~Lo¡ .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .t\, ~ -I>.. ~ -I>.. ~ \0 (.II ... ("I ~ ~ 125 ...." P ...." ....G) .... \0 .... .... "" I\) "" Lo¡ .... .t\, .... 1.11 138.43 (þ Q) ~ 60 0 '.J:) ()I) 00 85 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 85 125 ~ ( ) en m ..om ..... en CAMELOT DRIVE (7\ ~ ;:;>..... 139.04 0 0 Q) <:0 0 0 co co 85 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 8 125 en ~ ( ) m m co :t;: ..... 139.64 ..... ~ ~ æ ~ ~ ~ (..¡ ~(..¡ ~(..¡ ~Lo¡ ~(..¡~ m 0 (D ~ ~ ~ ....1.11 0 ...." .... .... .... .... f\) .... {..¡ .... .t\, ....0'1.... 8 0 .... c ..... ..... c , 125 (.II (.II , 85 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 85 fT1 co :t;: 140.17 CT1 < 0 0\ ~ < ~ ..... ..... :Þ Ci ~ Ci -I\) ....1\) Cil\) Cil\) ~I\)Ci 125 (.II (.II :;:0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 140.69 .... ~ .... .... ~(..¡ ~.t\, ""1.11 ....'" ........".... :t;: 0 .... co t..Tt co I\) 00 75 75 75 75 75 85 125 ( ) g ( ) 85 75 75 m m ..... ..... (7\ BEDFORD (7\ 0 141. 29 0 0 co ~ 00 85 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 251 en ( ) <n (..¡ <n ..... 141.9 ..... ~ ...... .... .... .... ~--~ -' Ci ~ ~ Ci (Þf__ . Ci è5 -- ...... (Þf - (Þf__ .... - .... '.,...¡ ..... ~ .... I..n ....(1) ..... ...." <:0.... N ~ ..... ..... N N( ..... (.II ~ (.II .:.. 85 142.12 » ~ () ..... ..... (.II ~(..¡ ~ ~...." Ci Ci (.II t" Ci Ci f\) Ci.t\, Ci C) 2~ 142.56 .... .... .... ....1.11 .... O'J .... ..... .... ~ 125 ..... ..... 60 75 75 75 75 75 75 75 8 (.II (.II - 70 142.67 ACADEMY DRIVE ~ 60 ~ 0 §~ ~ N 419.27 107.48 292.52 (.II {D-O 0 ,0 m_ I' <0 g, TRACT ;:;> 1\)0 ON TRACT "A" <~ .... "g' (.II ÒI . .... -"'ì .... 0:Þ (.II ~ so 1.30 389.31 80 9ð38 292.52 125 (J1 ~ I:: g g ~g; I -~------------------------ 4 g I 40 15 50 SO 50 45 .5 45 45 50 50 50 45 .5 .5 95 SO SO I 90 0;) nC¡ i\) - è5 \()O;)~ :<:;; ¡;;; -- ~di'.) I ::::: N - -- º EXHIBIT "B" v . .........- "':""""'IP - - - '-" AGENDA REQUEST ...., ITEM NO. :)- H- DATE: 07/18/00 CONSENT REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg. []Quasi-Jud. [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: ] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: Motion to Deny 5-0 County Attorney: (1t/ Originating Department: Community Development P:~Zk Request for Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Site Plan Approval and a Change in Zoning for Property located at 5615 Oleander Avenue, west side of Oleander Avenue, approximately 350 feet south of Gopher Ridge Road from the RS-3 (Residential, Single- Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the PNRD (Planned Non- Residential Development - Cagle's Cove) Zoning District - Draft Resolution 00-117. Petition of James and Shirley Cagle (Bruce R. Abernethy, Jr., Agent) for Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Site Plan Approval for the project to be known as Cagle's Cove - PNRD, and a Change in Zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single-Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - Cagle's Cove) Zoning District for a 16-bed Adult Congregate Living Facility. (File No.: RZ-00-008/RZ-99-011) N/A. On July 26, 1988, the Board of County Commissioners approved a conditional use permit to allow a 12-bed ACLF on this site. On May 20, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of a rezoning to the I (Institutional) Zoning District. The applicant withdrew the petition prior to its consideration by the Board of County Commissioners. On June 15, 2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 3 to 2 (Mr. Lounds and Mr. Merritt against), with four members absent (Mr. Trias, Mr. McCurdy, Mr. Moore, and Mr. Hearn), recommended approval of the Preliminary Planned Development site plan and rezoning of the petitioned property. Approve Draft Resolution 00-117 granting Preliminary and Final Planned Development Site Plan approval and a change in zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single-Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - Cagles's Cove) Zoning District for the project to be known as Cagle's Cove - PNRD. [X ] DENIED D 9 s M. Anderson County Administrator Review and ADDrovals Management & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) . - - > "-, . ....:::1- -,- TEÌt'1lAIN DEVELOPERS clfJ P.O. BOX '9H7 4401 WIIlTEWA Y DAIRY RD. · FT. PIERC.E. FLORIDA J PHONE FAX 561 - 4(,1 - 2~16 5(,1 - ;4(" -)If)J,} July 18, 2000 f I ¡, i L ;: ! ~ í¡ " ¡ I ¡ Ii I: I' : , : ¡ ¡ ": ¡ , I I I'i SL. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 349R2 Rc: Pine Hollow Street Lighting District Dear Commissioners, As the ,dcv~loper o~ the .Pine Hollow subdivision, J wish to ae~?~ledge m :; þupport for the street hghtmg thaI 1$ bemg proposed for the Pine Hollow subdivIsion. ., . I , i The original design and platting tor the subdivision included the installalio ¡ f street lighhng, however at that particular time Florida Power and Light did not find it feasi' e to provide the electrical power tor the street lighting. Since the inception of Pine Hollow, e area has seen a lot of growth with numerous families moving into the area thereby increasing vehicles and traffic flow into and out of the area. I' : The issue of security for the residents in this area is paramount in my supp ':: of the street lighting. llu.~ purpose of street lighting is primarily used to provide for low : vel lighting during the time in which home and neighborhood security is most vulnerable. On . erous occasions J have had to remove trash that was indiscriminately dumped in the area duro the night. Also, this Ilrea has become a gathering place for large groups of young people du, g the evening hours. Hopefully, with the addition ofÙ1e street lighting, the families and n' hborhoods ofthis area will be able to feci a little more secure. In addition, with the instalJatio' f the street lighting, the property values will increase. i I' II j i· ¡ Ii !; ¡ I I , I' I I: I:, ;1 ! ., Please feel trcc to conlact me should you desire to discuss this matter in gr Respectfully, [ p~~~ Terrain DC~~II~Crs Corporation TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: FUTURE LAND USE: PARCEL SIZE: PROPOSED USE: PERMITTED USES: '-' ~ COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: July 18,2000 Resolution 00-117 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Board of co~nt~ommissioners c~tfDeve~ July 12, 2000 Application of James and Shirley Cagle (Bruce R Abernethy, Jr., Agent), for Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the Project to be known as Cagle's Cove - PNRD, and a Change in Zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single-Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - Cagle's Cove) Zoning District. 5615 Oleander Avenue. West side of Oleander Avenue, approximately 350 feet south of Gopher Ridge Road. RS-3 (Residential, Single-Family - 3 du/acre) PNRD (planned Non-Residential Development - Cagle's Cove) RU (Residential Urban) 1. 7 acres Expansion of an existing ACLF to 16 residents Attachment "A" - Section 7.02.03 PNRD (planned Non- Residential Development) - contains the designated uses which are permitted by right, pennitted as an accessory use, or pennitted through the conditional use process. Any use designated as a "Conditional Use" is required to undergo further review and approvals. Any use not found within the zoning district regulations are designated as prohibited uses for that district ¡,; '-' June 8, 2000 Page 2 SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USES: FIREIEMS PROTECTION: UTILITY SERVICE: TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: "'-" Petition: James and Shirley Cagle File No.: RZ-00-008 RS-3 (Residential, Single-Family - 3 duJacre) The general existing use surrounding the property is residential. There are several institutional uses in the area. Sun Grove Montessori School is located on the east side of Oleander Avenue, diagonally across from the subject property. White City Elementary, Trinity Evangelical Presbyterian Church, and New Hope Baptist Church are located approximately ~ mile to the north. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is RU (Residential Urban) Station #6 (350 East Midway Road), is located approximately 4 miles to the northeast. The subject property is serviced by an existing well and septic system. The existing right-of-way width for Oleander Avenue varies in width from 66 to 76 feet. None. Concurrency Deferral Affidavit. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following detenninations: .' ~ '-' July 12,2000 Page 3 Petition: James and Shirley Cagle File No.: RZ-00-008 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions ofthe St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed rezoning and site plan are not in conflict with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The application for Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development approval has been reviewed for consistency with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and has been determined to meet all applicable standards of review. 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the 81. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The proposed change in zoning is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The PNRD (planned Non-Residential Development) Zoning District may be compatible with the RU Future Land Use provided that the requirements of Policy 1.1.8.4 are met. These requirements are met by this application. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The proposed zoning is consistent with existing and proposed land uses in the area. The general use of the immediate surrounding area of the subject property is residential with several institutional uses in the area. Sun Grove Montessori School is located on the east side of Oleander Avenue, diagonally from the subject property. White City Elementary, Trinity Evangelical Presbyterian Church, and New Hope Baptist Church are located approximately y.. mile to the north. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; Conditions have not changed so as to require an amendment. s. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; '-' .""" July 12, 2000 Page 4 Petition: James and Shirley Cagle File No.: RZ-00-008 The intended use for this rezoning is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. The Cagles currently operate an ACLF for 12 clients at this location. The increase to 16 clients will not result in any additional construction at this location. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. No physical changes to the exterior ofthe property are planned. 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; An orderly and logical development pattern will occur with this change in zoning. The surrounding parcels of property in the area are designated for residential and some institutional uses. The property is currently used as ACLF with 12 residents. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in hannony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. COMMENTS The petitioners, James and Shirley Cagle, have requested this change in zoning from the RS- 3 (Residential, Single-Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the PNRD (planned Non-Residential Development - Cagle's Cove) Zoning District in order to increase the number of residents of their community residential home from 12 to 16. On July 26, 1988, through Resolution 88-213 (copy attached), the Cagles were granted a conditional use pennit in order to establish an ACLF for up to 12 people. Since the time of the original conditional use permit approval, the regulations of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code have changed. A conditional use permit such as the one the Cagles were granted is now not possible. The RS-3 Zoning District now only allows up to 6 clients in Adult Congregate Living Facilities in this zoning district. '-" "wi July 12,2000 Page 5 Petition: James and Shirley Cagle File No.: RZ-00-008 In order to have up to the 16 clients as requested, the subj ect property would need to be zoned for either institutional or PNRD uses. The Institutional Zoning District allows Institutional Residential Homes, which allow for 15 or more clients. The Institutional Zoning District also allows for other pennitted uses which may not be appropriate at this location. The PNRD Zoning District, as presented, would allow for an ACLF of 16 clients as desired by the Cagles while not allowing the broad range of uses allowed in the Institutional district. On May 20, 1999, The Planning and Zoning Commission heard the request oft}tf R.~ rezone their property to the Institutional Zoning District and voted 7 to 0 to r~nd ¿;~~~d Board of County Commissioners grant their request. Prior to the public hearing before the Board of County Commissioners, the Cagles withdrew their petition because of opposition of their neighbors based on concerns that the Institutional Zoning District would allow other uses on the subject property that would not be compatible with the neighborhood. The Cagles would now like to pursue the PNRD Zoning District designation on their property. Staff has detennined that the PNRD Zoning District, as presented, would be compatible with the character of the neighborhood. The subject property is in an area of residential and some institutional uses. Sun Grove Montessori School is located on the east side of Oleander Avenue, diagonally across from the subject property. White City Elementary, Trinity Evangelical Presbyterian Church, and New Hope Baptist Church are located approximately ~ mile to the north. The PNRD Zoning District allows for the use requested while allowing restrictions to be placed on the use of the subject property. The PNRD also prevents the use of the property for the broad range of uses pennitted in the Institutional Zoning District. On June 15,2000, the Planning and Zoning Commission heard the request of the Cagles to rezone their property to the Planned Non-Residential Development Zoning District and voted 3 to 2 (Mr. Lounds and Mr. Merritt against), with four members absent (Mr. Trias, Mr. McCurdy, Mr. Moore, and Mr. Hearn) to recommend that the Board of County Commissioners grant their request. Neighbors of the Cagles expressed concerns that the drainfield of the existing septic system on the subject property could not support additional clients. This issue is regulated by the St. lucie County Health Department. Other concerns of the neighbors included the possibility of residents of the home wandering off and the potential for lowering of their property values. Staffhas reviewed this petition and detennined that it confonns with the standards of review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you fOlWard this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval, subject to the following limiting conditions: v """ July 12,2000 Page 6 Petition: James and Shirley Cagle File No.: RZ-00-008 1. The Cagle's Cove PNRD shall be limited to a maximum of 16 clients of the Department of Children and Families; 2. Parking shall be provided for the ACLF in accordance with the site plan and requirements of Section 7.06.02, Table 7-20 ofthe Land Development Code; 3. The subject property shall be landscaped in accordance with the site plan and requirements of Section 7.09.00 ofthe Land Development Code; and, 4. No additional construction for the housing ofthe clients shall be pennitted. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment hf cc: James and Shirley Cagle Bruce Abernethy, Jr. File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ~ ...,¡ RESOLUTION 00-117 FILE NO: RZ-OO-O08/RZ-99-011 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY AND FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS CAGLE'S COVE - PLANNED NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT, AND A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE RS-3 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY - 3 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE PNRD (PLANNED NON-RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT - CAGLE'S COVE) ZONING DISTRICT FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: CHANGE IN ZONING 1. James and Shirley Cagle (Bruce R. Abernethy. Jr.. Agent) presented a petition for a change in zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single-Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - Cagle's Cove) Zoning District for certain property in St. Lucie County, Florida. 2. On June 15, 2000, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing, of which due notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the hereafter described request for a change in zoning from the RS-3 (Residential, Single-Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development - Cagle's Cove) Zoning District. 3. On July 18, 2000, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property and granted final approval to the property described below. 4. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and meets the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. File No.: RZ-00-008/RZ-99-011 July 18, 2000 Resolution 00-117 Page 1 '" .."", 1 SITE PLAN 2 3 5. The petitioner is proposing the addition of 4 beds to an existing 12 bed facility for 4 a total of a 16-bed Adult Congregate Living Facility for property located at 5615 5 Oleander Avenue, west side of Oleander Avenue approximately 350 feet south of 6 Gopher Ridge Road. 7 8 6. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed 9 project and found it to meet minimum technical requirements. 10 11 7. On June 15,2000, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a 12 public hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property 13 owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and recommended that 14 the Board of County Commissioners approve the hereafter described request for the 15 project to be known as Cagle's Cove - PNRD. 16 17 8. On July 18, 2000, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing 18 a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet 19 of the subject property, and granted Preliminary and Final Development Site Plan 20 approval for the property described below. 21 22 9. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and 23 standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County 24 Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 25 26 10. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, 27 the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or 28 other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. 29 30 11. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the 31 proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, 32 landscaping, and screening. 33 34 12. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to 35 interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with 36 applicable district regulations. 37 38 13. The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services. 39 40 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. 41 Lucie County, Florida: 42 43 A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the 44 Final Site Plan for the project to be known as Cagle's Cove - A Planned Non-Residential File No.: RZ-00-o08/RZ-99-011 July 18, 2000 Resolution 00-117 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 '-' ""'" Development be, and the same is hereby approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by John G. Albritton, dated June 17, 1999, and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Community Development Director on March 22, 2000, for the property described below, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Cagle's Cove PNRD shall be limited to a maximum of 16 clients of the Department of Children and Families; 2. Parking shall be provided for the AClF in accordance with the site plan and requirements of Section 7.06.02, Table 7-20 of the land Development Code; 3. The subject property shall be landscaped in accordance with the site plan and requirements of Section 7.09.00 of the land Development Code; and, 4. No additional construction for the housing of the clients shall be permitted. 8. The property on which this Preliminary and Final Planned Non-Residential Development Site Plan approval is granted is described as follows: THE NORTH 161.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 312.50 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST; LESS AND EXCEPT THEREFROM THE WEST 279.00 FEET. ALL BEING AND LYING IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA THE EAST 119.00 FEET OF THE WEST 279.00 FEET OF THE NORTH 156.25 FEET OF THE SOUTH 312.51 FEET OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 9, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST; LESS AND EXCEPT THEREFROM THE WEST 279.00 FEET. ALL BEING AND LYING IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA SAID LANDS CONTAIN 1.701 ACRES (Location: 5615 Oleander Avenue, west side of Oleander Avenue, approximately 350 feet south of Gopher Ridge Road) C. This Preliminary and Final Planned Non-Residential Development Site Plan approval shall expire on July 18, 2002, unless a license is issued by the Department of Children and Families for the additional residents or an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(8)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code. D. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on July 18, 2000. File No.: RZ-OO-008/RZ-99-011 July 18, 2000 Resolution 00-117 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 'w ..,.¡ E. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Section A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman John D. Bruhn xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX Vice-Chairman Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner clim Barnes PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 18th Day of July 2000. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney hf H:\WP\RESOLUTI.N\FINISHED.2000\Cagle.PD\Cagle.wpd File No.: RZ-00-008/RZ-99-011 July 18, 2000 Resolution 00-117 Page 4 ~ '-' ~ Q) 0> ---- z Cd " E 0 ... " c... " " >- ex:> E ... 0 1>,'" 0 Q) 0 ~ c 0 N 0 " 0 ~ >- 0; " ... I Q " .. ..c E · 0 ...... :II (f) 0 ::::.2 ." · C C .. " ,,- · ... 06 N E ( · .. E:ë ... a: o I>, ... ~ U II · å en ... :II \ C. .. Q) 0 '\ " E CI Cd J ... ... I: ... .. .: ~ .: Z ::> .. 0 ~ () Z GYOIf _ ::> 0 () a: ~ I J i a: ... ~ __ W]CI Z ~ ... ¡::: II :. I II a: I « .: GYOIf _ ::2 ~ .: ë5 HI-' ~ ~ S K .1 S 'ã .1 ... ! ... 0- .. ! I!í ... '" .: AlNn08 3380H833>tO , " 'w' -..I A petition of James and Shirley Cagle for a Change in Zoning from RS-3 (Residential, Single Family - 3 units/acre) to PNRD (Planned Non-Residential Development) . 1 1 I 24125 26127 I 4 23 33 52 -+J -"22- - -+J --34 -šï- v 5 V V L- V -+J 6 21 L- 35 50 (f) -+J 7 20 (f) -49- J6 --/9-- -+J ---- 8 L- -g- o /8 ..c: --- (f) /0 " 39 -46 /6 --"40- -:;3- II /2 /5 4/ # ---- /3 /4 42 43 V :J c: V > « ~__.J \: : I I I ___-146 45 I #143 42,4/ 49 I I I ~, I I i38 J7136 35 1 1 1 1 ~1$lffl 201~1~126 æl~~I~ 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 ~_L-.J_ _L _.1_ Þuw"U1ILtQ>V ®I 1 "1/9 121123125127 29 13/ 33135 1 1 1 1 I 1 1 1 361J8 1 1 -1- J7 '39 1 I 1 1 1 50 40142' # r-:;g- 1 I I ,-:;- 1 L___ 4/ ~3 45 L-~- I 1-46 /4\/5 I I 3 4 5 I I I 8 I 9 I I 1 I 2 40---'" ,-- , I ' , \ \ ' , I , ' ...----/ Kearney L- I v "'0 1 1 1 I c: , 1 1 1 0 3 1 4 1 1 I v 5 6 1 7 1 8 9 I 0 I 1 1 1 I 2 I I I 1 1 I 1 2 3 14 IÀ 1 III C 0 ..J :5 8 5 --- 'Ë 7 6 VI Tupelo Street ~~® RZ 00-008 ~ / 7//1 This, pattern indicates ~/ ~ subject parcel Community Development f Geographic Information Systems Map revised May 31,2000 11>10 mop .... -. CGrI"4>Iod ...--"..,.,q ... - - CIriy. N ¥HI ..., illicit... beIn tMdI III PftMdI .. .... o.mr( Iftd ~ InIorrNIan ~.II not ~ tar '* . . ~ bftIna dI:Icunn. '-' J James and Shirley Cagle Zoning I ~- I : I- 241125 26127 1 'I 'I 'I I , 1 I I 1 ,41/61,8 20122124126 28130 32134 I: I I 1 1 I J._L_L _L _.1._ «» lllD ~ IL tþ) t ~ I I 171/9 121123125127 29 131 33 35 ! II!! ! ! r.nnher Idge ~ood 1 J 1 I I 28129 30131?2 I i I I I 50 I 1 I __ 401421441-:;- I I I i ----- 48 1 L____ 4/~3 451 47 .' 1----- ! I 46 : : ¡ : n6181101/2 H I I I I 1 I HI I I I I t-!7 9 " 131/5 I I I I I : I 1 36 :38 _I I J7 139 I ! f-~--.J 1-.::""---146 49 I Reeve Street I 45 I 44\ 43 42 \ 41 40 I ~: 38 J7: J6 35 \ ¡¡I I Cor -Com bell Rood I I I I I 415167189110 "1/2 13 '4\'5 I I I I © I ! I ! \ I I GODher Road \: : 1 I 1 I I 1 3i45617 1 I I I I I ! \ Kearney Road I I I II I I 1 1 1 I 3 4 1 1 1 56171891 1 1 ¡---t 1 1 I 1 I I ~ i : ::>treet 1 1 I I 1 2 1 3 14 \ 'U3' I I I 1 I 819 I 1 I I I / ----- 2 I---:J-- 015 \ /5 --- 13 .-' I ... 39 46 ---"40- --43-- --- 41 44 ---------- 42 43 RS-3 ~j o Q) :J C Q) > « 2 4 2J 33 52 ...... 1--- -"22-- ......1---J4--5ï- ~ 5 Q) ~ Q) ...... 6 21 ~ 35 50 (/) 1----- (/) 49-- r-!- 20 1-__ ---- r---~----- UI 8 /9 ~ 48 > 1--9 0 - 2 ~ f--=- 18 .!: J8 47 L..J --- ---- (/) 10 17 --- -ï6-- - / " 1--- 12 2 ,,,~---.., r ' , I I ' , I ... , '--_.-/ Olive T J 14 ! II) c o ...J 8 5 :5 ---- ---- 'E 7 6 (f 2 IA AFR-1 / Tupelo Street ~~~ I f- RZ 00-008 V 7 /7 / /i This. pattern indicates 1iL/ ~ subject parcel . Community Development t . Geographic Information Systems . . Map revised May 31,2000 A ::. ":,y"'",=, "::'" ..: -.:-,..,.:-:: =~"= q, N k1IormIiIIan ......... II I'ICII i*nded tar \Me . . ...... bIncIna cIocutwt. '-' .,I Use James and Shirley Cagle 1 I I 24 125 26 '27 , I , I HIŒlm rol~I~I26 æl~~I~ 1 1 I I 1 1 I .1_L_L _L _.1_ ~( jD'TI1IL~V ®: J 171/9 121123125 127 29 131 33135 I 1 , 1 1 I I G 36138 I 1 I J7 '39 I 1 , I 1 50 40142'44 1-:;- I I I I ,--;- 1 L___ 41 ~3 45 L-~- I I 46 I !!__-.J I 1 I 1 I I ----146 451 44143 421 41 49 I ~, I I :38 J7 J6 35 1 141/5 I I I 1 I 28129 J013/~2 4 2J 33 52 -+-J - 22-- -+-J --34 -šï- ( ) 5 ( ) ( ) ...... RU ( ) -+-J 6 21 ...... 35 50 (/) -+-J 7 ro (/) - 49- J6 (/ --,r- ---- 8 -+-J > ...... __2 48 0 -g- o m J:: J8 '" 0 --- (f) 10 f1 J9 46 -ï6- --40- -43- II ïr --- 15 41 44 13 H 42 --.fj- ...---" ,'" " r \ , I \ I , I \, , ...----/ 1 I , I ( ) I I ::J 3 4 5 6 I 7 8 1 9 C I 1 ( ) > 1 1 « 2 I I I 1 Kearney ...... I ( ) "0 1 1 1 I c I 1 1 I 0 314 I I I ( ) 5 6 I 7 I 8 9 I 0 I I I I I 2 I I I I I I I 3 I 4 I 2 2 I J /4 ~ I 41 I c 0 ..J 5 8 £ --- 'Ë 7 6 (/) Tupelo Street PIF ~~® RZ 00-008 V7 /7 ~ This. pattern indicates ~/ .LLj subject parcel . Community Development t Geographic Information Systems Map revised May 31,2000 -_....__..__ond__..... N WhII IMIY eIIart... bMn ... to praWte .. mall c:urw( Ind ~ Ir*IrmIIIan ~I.. nallnIIIIndId tar...... 5IgIIv bR:Ing docunert. '-' ...I o -:=: 6/~ ß-/CIYli JJI'e4 )F SOUTH 312. 5' oE/ 14-NE1/ 4 - 4' ClF ~.D o 'Z o o s,\ NB9'S9'02IE M -, I I . _ J SÐER PIW 'J L..----L---L----L---L---L-- _L---L--- IRRIGATION WELL ~ 6.0' \n . ... ~ffi ~ ffi ~ o o 12.0' <.!:> o .-J CDLD LLJ..-4 ~lD c(,LD ex: L1.- . o :z: ~ ~ ~ eo ò ~ ~~ g N 50- (I') L --"1--"1--"1 --"1--1--1 . >- r- ef) ..-4 FIRE SPRIHKLER~ SYSTEM ;., ,... ... all CATCH WI. ~ 54.6' IEIIEII~ ---------- ./ Œ<:J w ~Ø8 CQMC. PAD ~ I ~ ,ï woo IOAØI f£1IC£ :..1 gl OVERHEAD UTILITIES '" 4' CLF S89'S9'02IW 346. 68'D/M f'-" 910995 ~.. Ç~\-<:.. ~.. -ç', V) _ (~""'- \:).Q ù Ú, \' ~\\'\~'\ 5 'L:c\ ð \ t' :-- b RESOLUTION NO. 88-213 FILE NO. CO-88-0ll ( ----.----'-_.._--- A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS SHIRLEY CAGLE (GROUP CARE HOME) WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of st. Lucie County, Florida: has made the following determinations: 1. A group care home, has been proposed for location on the west side of Oleander Avenue, approximately 320 feet south of Gopher Ridge Road, (5615 Oleander Avenue) which project is to be known as Shirley Cagle (Group Care Home). 2. The st. Lucie County Community Development Director has reviewed the conditional use permit application for the proposed ( project and determined it not to meet the requirements for a site development plan, but to be consistent with both the existing zoning and with the future land use maps from the st. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan. 3. On June 23. 1988, the st. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed conditional us~, after publishing notice in the Fort Pierce News Tribune and notifying by 'mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the project at least 15 days prior to such hearing, and recommended that the permit be approved. 4. On July 26¡ 1988, this Board held a public hearing on the proposed conditional use, .after publishing notiáe of such (. hearing in the, Fort Pierce News Tribune on July 6 , 1988 , and ~O§K 599 r~Gf 23 59 {"" y after notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the property. 5. The proposed conditional use is in compliance with all requirements, and is consistent with the general purpose, goals, obj ectives, and standards, of the st. Lucie County Growth Management Policy Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of st. Lucie County. 6. The proposed conditional use will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent or nearby property, and is compatible wi th the existing or planned character of the neighborhood in which it would be located. 7. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed conditional use on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping, and screening. 8. The proposed conditional use will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 9. The proposed conditional use will be served by adequate public facilities and services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of st. Lucie County, Florida: ~O~K 599 PAGf 2360 , , , . ( ) ( (, ( ( ( . . t\.i 'wi A. Pursuant to Section 5.4.000 of the st. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance, a conditional use permit for the project to be known as Shirley Cagle (Group Care Home) be, approved, subject to the following condition: 1. This facility shall be limited to housing no more than 12 unrelated individuals. B. This conditional use permi t shall expire on July 26, 1989, unless a building permit and/or zoning compliance are issued, or an extension granted in accordance with Section 5.4.600, st. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance is applied for and granted. C. The conditions set forth in Section A are integral and nonseverable part of the conditional use permit granted by this resolution. If any condition set forth in Section A is determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the developer declines to comply voluntarily with that condition, the condi tiona1 use permit granted. by this resolution shall become null and void. D. A copy of~this resolution shall be placed on file with the st. Lucie County Community Development Director. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Jack Krieger AYE Vice-Chairman Havert Fenn ABSENT ~oðJ: 599 PAGE ~361 ~. \J , . Commissioner R. Dale Trefelner AYE Commissioner Jim Minix AYE ( Commissioner Judy Culpepper ABSENT PASSED AND DULY 'ADOPTED this 26th day of July, 1988. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLO~IDA BY: ~/l- !fJ- CHAI ",/ ....../ . ,"or ....'.;~ :<," ...,;~ .,f' , .' . . t' " FORM AND (. ( , . " 910995 °88 AUG 19 A9 :37 .. FIll"'.' " _ . . reI'\. .".", . .,~~...,~ -- ., .. , : ,.. L. . OOUGlA':: ,'. ., .., ::."-:..:.......,~ " ',., -1"f1 5T lUCIí- ,; .., 1 . '::,' , . '- ...- I~.. ' . '. ~: c. ~O~K 599 PAGf2362 '-" ....I Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Us~ Regulations I. RS-3 RESIDENTIAL. SINGLE-FAMILY - 3 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for single-family dwellings at a maximum density of three (3) dwelling units per gross acre, together with such other uses as may be necessary for and compatible with low density residential surroundings. The number in "0" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Family day care homes. (999) b. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) notifies the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. (999) c. Single-family detached dwellings.· (999) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking Requirements Off-street parking requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.06.00. 6. Conditional Uses a. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of another such family residential home. (999) b. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999) 7. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00. Adopted August 1, 1990 106 Revised Through 09/07/99 '-' ...., CHAPTER VII DEVELOPMENT DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 7.00.00 GENERAL PROVISIONS 7.00.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Chapter is to provide· development design and improvement standards applicable to development activity in the unincorporated area of the County. 7.01.00 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 7.01.01 PURPOSE The Planned Unit Development (PUD) District is intended to achieve residential land development of superior quality through the encouragement of flexibility and creativity in design options that: A. permit creative approaches to the development of residential land reflecting changes in the technology of land development; B. allow for the efficient use of land, which can result in smaller networks of utilities and streets and thereby lower development costs; C. allow design options that encourage an environment of stable character, compatible with surrounding land uses; and D. permit the enhancement of neighborhoods through the preservation of natural features, the provision of underground utilities, and the provision of recreation areas and open space. 7.01.02 AUTHORIZED USES A. . PERMITTED USES Any permitted, conditional or accessory use in the Agricultural-1 (AG-1); Agricultural-2.5 (AG-2.5); Agricultural-5 (AG-5); Residential/Conservation in the Agricultural-1 (AG-1); Agricultural-2.5 (AG-2.5); Agricultural-5 (AG-5); Residential/Conservation (RC); Residential, Estate-1 '(RE-15; Residential, Estate-2 (RE-2); Residential, Single-Family-2 (RS-2); Residential, Single-Family-3 (RS-3); Residential, Single-Family-4 (RS-4); Residential, Multiple-Family-5 (RM-5); Residential, Mobile Home- 5 (RMH-5); Residential, Multiple-Family-7 (RM-7); Residential, Multiple-Family-9 (RM-9); Residential, Multiple-Family-11 (RM-11); and Residential, Multlple-Family-15 (RM-15) zoning districts of this Code may be permitted in a Planned Unit Development District subject to complying with the residential densities described in Section 7.01.03(B). Adopted August 1, 1990 375 Revised Through 09/07/99 '-" ...." Section 7.01.00 Planned Unit Development B. NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT USES Uses of the types permitted in the Commercial, Neighborhood (CN) District are also permitted up to an amount not to exceed three (3) percent of the gross area of the Planned Unit Development or ten (10) acres, whichever is less. In addition, playgrounds, public and non-public parks, golf courses, country clubs, bicycle paths, racquet sports facilities, riding stables, marinas, clubhouses, and lodges may be permitted in a Planned Unit Development District. 7.01.03 STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS Standards and requirements for a Planned Unit Development shall be as follows: A. MINIMUM SIZE A Planned Unit Development shall be a minimum of five (5) contiguous acres of land under common ownership or control. B. DENSITY The maximum possible permitted density of a Planned Unit Development shall not exceed the density reflected in the Future Land Use Maps of the Comprehensive Plan. On North and South Hutchinson Island, the provisions of Section 3.01.03(AA)(8) shall govern. C. AREA, YARD, AND HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS Area, yard, and height requirements shall be determined at the time of Preliminary and Final Development Plan approval, except that for any structure on North or South Hutchinson Island that has not been occupied, constructed, or has not received a building permit, site plan or other County development approval as a permitted use prior to January 10, 1995 the requirements of Section 4.01.00, Hutchinson Island - Building Height Overlay Zone shall apply. D. PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. The Planned Unit Development shall be designed and located so there will be no net public cost for the provision of water lines, sewage lines, storm and surface drainage systems, and other utility systems. 2. The minimum size of all water mains used, or intended for use, in fire protection activities is six (6") inches. Actual water main requirements will be determined by the St. Lucie County- Ft. Pierce Fire Prevention Bureau. 3. The minimum size of all water mains used, or intended for use, in fire protection activities, that are located on a dead-end water main is eight (8") inches. Actual water main requirements will be determined by the St. Lucie County-Ft. Pierce Fire Prevention Bureau. The maximum number of fire hydrants that may be located on any dead end water main is one (1). Adopted August 1,1990 376 Revised Through 09107/99 '-' '-..I Section 7.01.00 Planned Unit Development 4. Fire hydrants shall be provided at a minimum spacing of one every six hundred (600) feet unless otherwise approved by the St. Lucie County-Ft. Pierce Fire Prevention Bureau. E. TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION 1. Every dwelling unit, or other use permitted in the Planned Unit Development shall have access to a public street either directly or through an approved private road, a pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use. 2. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to permit smooth traffic flow with controlled turning movement and minimum hazards to vehicular or pedestrian traffic. Minor streets within the Planned Unit Development shall not be connected to streets outside the development so as to encourage their use by through traffic. 3. The proposed Planned Unit Development shall be designed so that it will not create traffic congestion on the arterial and collector roads surrounding the project, or such surrounding collector or arterial roads shall be improved so that they will not be adversely affected. 4. All non-residential land uses within the Planned Unit Development shall have direct access to a collector or arterial street without creating traffic hazards or congestion on any street. 5. Streets in a Planned Unit Development may be dedicated to public use or retained under private ownership. Said streets and associated improvements shall comply with all pertinent County regulations and ordinanœs, however, variations to the standard minimum right-of- way widths may be considered as part of the Planned Unit Development if it is shown to the satisfaction of the Board of County Commissioners, that the requested variation is consistent with the intent of the County's roadway construction standards and necessary for the design of the Planned Unit Development. 6. All roads and streets shall intersect at an approximate ±5° angle of ninety degrees (90°) unless circumstances acceptable to St. Lucie County indicate a need for a lesser angle of intersection. 7. Street jogs or centerline offsets between any local street or road with another local street or road, shall be no less than one hundred fifty feet (150). 8. The intersection of any two local roads or streets with a Major Collector or Arterial Roadway shall be separated by.a minimum distance of six hundred sixty feet (660), as measured from centerline to centerline. 9. Permanent dead-end streets shall not exceed one thousand feet (1000) in length. Cul-de-sacs shall be provided at the end of all dead end roads or streets greater than five hundred and one (501) feet in length. The length of a dead-end street shall be measured along the centerline of the street from the its point of perpendicular intersection with the centerline of intersecting street to the end of the dead-end street or roadway. All cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum right-of-way diameter of one hundred (100) feet. If the dead end roadway Is five hundred (500) feet or less in length, a"Y" or "T" type of turn Adopted August 1, 1990 377 Revised Through 09107/99 '-' ;J Section 7.01.00 Planned Unit Development around may be approved. If a dead end street is temporary in nature then a temporary cul-de-sac shall be required until the roadway is connected to another street or road. In the center of the cul-de-sac an unpaved island, surrounded by a curb, improved with grass and landscaping that will not interfere with sight distance, may be provided. Center islands shall have a diameter of not less than seventeen (17) feet. unless othelWise approved through the review of the Planned Unit Development. 10. All roadways, exclusive of interior parking and access aisles areas, regardless of ownership, shall be located a minimum of ten (10) feet from any exterior building walls, except for security gate houses or similar security structures located in a private street or road right-of- way. 11. Any pedestrian circulation system and its related walkways shall be insulated from the vehicular street system. This shall include, when deemed to be necessary by the Board of County Commissioners. pedestrian underpasses or overpasses in the vicinity of playgrounds and other recreation areas, local shopping areas, and other neighborhood uses which generate a considerable amount of pedestrian traffic. 12. Access points on all collector or arterial streets serving a Planned Unit Development shall be located and spaced so that traffic moving into and out of the arterial streets do not cause traffic congestion. F. PARKING AND LOADING 1. General Provisions a. The number, type, and location of parking spaces shall be determined at the time of final Planned Unit Development plan approval. The determination of the number of spaces required shall be based on Section 7.06.01 (F) of this Code. The number of parking spaces required by this section may be reduced based on substantial competent evidence that the reduced number of spaces is adequate for the proposed use or that parking may be shared by proximate uses that operate at different times or on different days. b. Reserved parking spaces may be provided, in lieu of paved spaces, subject to Section 7.06.02(C) of this Code. 2. Off Street Parking and Loading Off-street parking and loading requirements are governed by Sections 7.06.02 and 7.06.03 of this Code, and the following standards: a. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be designed to provide travelways between adjacent uses while discouraging through traffic. Adopted August 1.1990 378 Revised Through 09/07/99 '-' -...; Section 7.01.00 Planned Unit Development b. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be screened from adjacent roads and pedestrian walkways with hedges, dense planting, or changes in grades or walls. 3. On Street Parking In Planned Unit Developments, on street parking may be used so long as the road on which the on-street parking is proposed lies entirely within the limits of the defined Planned Unit Development and such parking would not contravene any other provision of this Code or the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances. Where such on street parking and loading is used, it shall be consistent with the following design standards: a. The minimum size of a parking stall shall be as follows: parallel angled handicapped(parallel) handicapped(angled) 8 feet X 23 feet 10 feet X 18 feet 12 feet X 23 feet 12 feet X 18 feet b. Handicapped parking spaces shall be appropriately marked. c. Access for emergency fire vehicles shall be in accordance with NFPA standards. d. No more than fifteen (15) parking spaces shall be permitted in a continuous row without being interrupted by a minimum landscape area of 360 square feet. G. LIGHTING All lighting facilities shall be arranged in such a manner so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or properties. H. LANDSCAPING AND NATURAL FEATURES 1. Native trees and vegetation and other natural features shall be preserved to the extent practicable. 2. All sensitive environmental vegetation, trees and areas shall be preserved to the extent practicable. 3. Landscaping for off-street parking and loading areas shall meet the minimum requirements of Section 7.09.00. I. OPEN SPACE STANDARDS 1. A minimum of thirty-five (35) percent of the gross area of land to be committed to a Planned Unit Development must be for use as common open space, which may include, parks, recreation areas, bicycle and pedestrian paths and facilities, marinas, swimming beaches, common open space, common landscaping and planting areas, or other areas of public purposes or use other than street, road or drainage rights-of-way, above ground utilities, Adopted August 1, 1990 379 Revised Through 09107/99 '-' ......, Section 7.01.00 Planned Unit Development excluding stormwater treatment facilities, and parking areas. A minimum of 15 percent of any existing native upland habitat on the property, must be preserved in its natural condition as part of the required 35 percent common open space, For each acre of preserved native habitat above the required minimum 15 percent that is preserved in its original state, credit shall be given at a rate of 150 percent per acre towards the remaining common open space requirement. All areas to be dedicated for common open space shall be identified as part of the Preliminary Development Plan for the Planned Unit Development. Areas that are floodways, lakes, wetlands, and stormwater retention areas may be applied to satisfy the total common open space requirement, sUbject to the requirement that 15% of any existing native habitat on the property must be included as part of the required 35% common open space. As part of the Final Planned Unit Development submission process, the developer or petitioner for the Planned Unit Development shall provide for one of the following: a. The advance dedication of all common open space to a public, or acceptable private, agency that will, upon acceptance, agree to maintain the common open space and any buildings, structures or improvements that have been placed on it. All such dedications or conveyances shall be completed prior to the issuance of any building permits, including land clearing, for any portion of the Planned Unit Development ;or, b. A phased conveyance of the land toa public or acceptable private agency that will, upon acceptance, agree to maintain the common open space and any buildings, structures or improvements that have been placed on it. The schedule for the phased conveyance of any such lands to be used for common open space shall be a specific condition of approval for the Planned Unit Development. 2. No parcel of land identified for use as a park or common open space shall be less than one (1) contiguous acre, and all such areas shall be physically part of the Planned Unit Devel- opment. 3. Areas provided or reserved to meet any other environmental preservation or protection requirements of this code or other lawful regulatory authority may be counted towards the overall common open space requirement, provided that the common open space meets the requirements of this Code. J. SETBACKS FROM AGRICULTURAL LAND Planned Unit Developments adjacent to land used for agricultural purposes, or designated for agricultural use on the Future Land Use Map of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, shall provide setbacks from the agricultural land sufficient to protect the function and operation of those uses from the encroachment of Urban activities or uses. K. PHASING 1. A Planned Unit Development may be developed in more than one stage or phase. Adopted August 1,1990 380 Revised Through 09107/99 '-' ....., Section 7.01.00 Planned Unit Development 2. If a Final Development Site Plan approved by the Board of County Commissioners is to be developed in stages or phases, each successive phase shall be constructed and developed in a reasonably continuous fashion. No more than two (2) years shall elapse between the completion of any stage or phase, and the final stage or phase shall be completed within ten (10) years of the date of Final Development Site Plan approval. Extensions of the above requirements are subject to approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Unless otherwise amended by the Board of County Commissioners through the Final Development Site Plan review process, the following sequence of development must be adhered to: a. One or more major recreation facilities and other major amenities, planned to serve the entire development, shall be completed or adequate security posted prior to the issuance of building or mobile home permits of more than forty (40) percent, or other percentage as determined by the Board to be appropriate based on circumstances that include the size of the project and the proposed phasing schedule, of the total number of authorized dwelling units. Recreation facilities or facilities and other amenities planned to serve one (1) phase of a multi-phased development shall be completed or appropriate security posted prior to issuance of building or mobile home permits or the recording of any final plat within that phase. . b. No commercial facility shall be permitted prior to the completion of at least forty (40) percent of the total number of authorized dwelling units; and, c, For Planned Unit Developments to be constructed in stages or phases, the net density of an individual stage or phase may vary from the approved Final Site Plan subject to the requirements in Section 11.02.05. Adopted August 1, 1990 381 Revised Through 09/07/99 " Ii II II en CI) o .~ CI) en r:::: o :¡:; co ¡E ~ o - r:::: -~ .~ C) .r:::: co c.o E >- C)CI) 01: CI) .- CJæ .'0 ... r:::: æ co E en c.CI) o E - co ~~ CI) 0 c_ >-CX) :::0 r::::o ~ . E8 EN 00: o ~ _ 0 0- ... ... r:::: en CI):::¡ E ~~ co .- 0.= CI) co c~ 01 o! .........; ,... ! ~I II) >, ¡i¡i¡i¡i¡i¡i Q)i Q)! Q) Q) ~¡ ~,~ ~ Q)i Q)iQ) Q) ïï:lïï:lïï: ïï: II Ii II , Q) Q) Q) Q)i ~ ~ U u, Q) Q) ~ ~¡ ïï: ïï: ïï: ïï:! t: t:~t: æ æ æ! -'.~ ~ 'i\J1 ~ "Co ~....~:s! "CtI) .... rlUOO S=rnO.o '-' F F F ~ ';> F ~ ~aëdca--('j8e 8~~~ooo~~ -~- V) -V)V)V)O--~V) O---t-\O'<tOc<'l oot-t-t-V)It')It')t-N ........ .....¡........ ..., .... fI} fI} Q,) """ "'0 "'0 1< I' 1 II -.:r ' Q,) a c:I z ('t') Q,) a ° c:I ~ =ã Z ~ ~ s= ~:= = s= ° <I u.:= B .... M ..... 0 .Q~~ rn s= s= s= rn 000 ~ ~~~ ;..cUUU .... .... <I <I <I .....-.................. ~ ~.... ~ ~ ~......u _u~~ ~~.... ~~55~s=~ "C 0 ~~ "C"C.....j"C"C.:=.:=uo~ ~o~~~s=~JJ~~11 11BB],.Q~ "C.>=~~~~O~~QO oo~~6Bo ~~ ............~......~~UQ~ QQ......tI)~ ~~~ ~ .;;.;;g ~~~~'ð~~ U 0 <I ... .5 ; ::s ~~~z~u~ rn S=S=S= ~ ~ '" rn s= s= ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~88- ~~~- ....¡tèSè5ðð~:§~~~.Q I~¡ j~! £ 3 ~ u ·3 ~ () ~§~§§b~-§§~~~§§~ §§-~§~~§~-§~§§- _0000N~§t-~It')---0000Nooc<'l'<t00~-S-elt')~~N8-t-~ 8 *§§§§8§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§§8Š~§8§§§§§§~ 8Sõõ8õ~8~õS~~8õõõ88õõõõ8õõõ~~~õ 8_ ~t-1t')00~-00-t-8--001t')t-8ooooV)1t')8~00t-\O~ð--V) 00 ~ ~_8~~_@~~8_~@~@8_~~~~__~8~__@~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In G) o .S; ... G) en C o ;: ca E ... o - C G) 0- .- IC) .c ca 0.0 ~ >- C)G) Oï: G) .- CJæ ."C - C äi ca E In o.G) o E - ca ~"") G) ... c,E ~CX) .- 0 CO ::J · Eg EN 00: o ... _ 0 0- - - C In G)- E...J ~g» ca .- 0.= G) ca c:æ II ~I IIŠI i~j 0:1 .ell ~!i ('I)" -II L() \1 I' L~ c c CIS i:S CIS õ D ~ CIS B Cf)Cf) D D ~~ ~~ N ~ ~ Z ~ ..... U G) .3 £ £ c ,............. èå:;:UV ~~~ Q 3 3 i;s~ ~~..... ~ § D D CIS-o-o .0 .... .... 1; 1; 5G)G)o505o5 o 0 <1.1 ..ê ..ê .:= .... .... ';Ooo=E!S ~p:::Cf)Cf)Cf)Cf)Cf) I I I - ! .¡;: ...... s~££ !:Iõ;;;; f-<>~~ ::>T, luèlE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA;i'~ July 18, 2000 . TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: . "". ¥ ( NOTICE is t;¡.ereby given in accordance with Section ' 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code \ and in accordance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicant has requested that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: . 1. Petition of Roger Medema for a 12-month extension of \/ a Partial Final Planned Development Site Plan approval for the project known as Palm Breezes Club MHP - Planned J Unit Development, and a Change in Zoning from the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes) _ Zoning Oistrict for the following described property: 1 A PARCEL OF lAND lYING IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP - 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. lUCIE COUNTY FLORI- DA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS' FOllOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE"; SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER J~ OF SAID SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST; THENCE, NORTH 890059'46' EAST ALONG THE C SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION,') 10, A DISTANCE OF 793.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH t 000000'14' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 85.00 FEET TO THç'~'1 POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE, NORTH' 000006'22' ~~. EAST, A DISTANCE OF 465.00 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH .<; 890059'46' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 793.80 FEET TO THE"1: WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID.«>: SECTION 10; THENCE, NORTH 000006'22"; EAST ALONG THE WE. ST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUAR. TER OFS1E. ..C.~l..' TION 10, A DISTANCE OF 789.15 FEET TO THE sour LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER 'OF THE NOR WEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; THENCE NOR·· 890052'47" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE 'OF., , NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER' I A DISTANCE OF 509.36 FEET; THENCE, NOR. I 000007'13' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 75.86 FEET; THENC ' NORTH 210012'38' WEST, A, DISTANCeO.F 90.00 THENCE, NORTH 700007'13' WEST, .ADISTANC 55.54 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 2400.12'25' WEST,A D TANCEOF 115.23 ,FEET TO A POINT,Of NON~TANGe " INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE CONCAVE TO: NORTHWEST A RADIAl.: TO SAID POINTBEARS;NOR 240012'25':WEST, HAVING A RADIUS,;OE.390.00 fEEI:, THENCE, WESTERLY ALONG SAIDCU,R~ THROUGtLA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 030041 '47", AN ARC DlSTANCE'nEj 25.16, FEET; THENCE; NORTH 350008~23"tWEST;~¡!I)¡S4' TANCE OF. 124.86 FEET; THENCEíÌi~ORTH51~~'O~41~· WEST, ADIS.TANCEOF 36.82. FEEij..{¡.~THENC~OR. TH 300044'1 Oi:'WEST; A DISTANCE OF,;95.oo FEcT;"TOA·~ NON-TANGENT INTERSECTION WITHA'CUR~N6AVE TO THE NORTHWEST ¡ A RADIAL TO ,.sAID POItlT;BEARS NORTH3ß0044'10'WEST, ANDHAVING,Ä]OOiIUS 0 37.50 FEET; '·,THENCE,EASTERL't¡~"ONGS"'D '. CIJR THROUGHkCENTRAL ANGEL.Or·o1~~14',597;'AN ,AR , DISTANCeOF,9.33: FEET, TO A P.OINJOFINTERSECTIO WITH.AiCOMPOUND·· CURVE~VING·1A:MOIU$./ 387.50 FEET; '.THENCE, NORTHEß~Y;~'1.HßO .I TRAL''ÁN'GEL:''OF'9f30i>46'03O;>WJ',iáftC)aÞ. .. 654.45 FEET; THENCE;.NORTH 3~14'4T , TANCE OF 125J~O"fEer¡,;;JH~.NCEI~QR;rH¡', EAST. A DISTANCEOF1.1,36:7LEEET;.,;.1,HENCE;: 890044'42' EAST,ADISTANCe¡,OF{l64¡S8}FEEr- WEST LINE, OF THE,NORT:HEAST:.;QUARTER;:,,, SOUTH ,op~'22' WEST;· 'ALONG!TflEWES THE NORTHEAST aUARTER..A~PIS],ANCE.. FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 890044'42: EAST, A 62.41 FEET TO A'POINT'OFCURVA1'URE CONCAVÈ TO THE1S0UTHWESr¡".HAVING A 70.00 FEET; THENCE, SO\JTHEASTERL V:' CENTRAL ANGLEOF610016~19~:,AN ARC,DIS . 74.86 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH ~280028'24~.; ,,',A.D TANCE 'OF 67.84~FEET:'THENCE, SO, . ~9: EAST; A DISTANCE OF ~89.92,FEET TO A~P.QIN1;!OF,C VATURE OF A~ClJRVECO~O~VETO THEts.O ..... -.!:1[\YING A RADIUS,OF,25.00, fEET; ..~ rnéRøa: t:A::iTER~'f¿"1H.. RO.UG. .WA$. EN..T.AL ANG...LEto ·6.1'· EAST, A~iARC" DISTANt O:OE 26.84' . " !" SOUTHì2.~28'24· EA ..' .ISTANG ; THENC!:~NORTH 6", 6 EAS. 141.00 FEET; .;·THENG, OUTH 28 . T ANCE':OF "130~00¡FEi' '{I1.THENC8 . EA5,:T;¡i'\i9ISTANÇ,~'lQ.1?~8:58";¡:. f:¡.. ".'NC )' 32õò3001 . EAST,'~\QlS ANCE O~()Ö. ..' ... ET <"NOR. TH :61c>031~361E. ø:S. T;:A D. I.STÄNi~. .. Fíí3 '!' THENCE, SO.uTJ:I~Z.;J0·Q1~j';EA~,!~~, : :515.40f.EET;~*T/;IE~Ge¡~QUTH'~{3Ti ,;:rANCE tOF.983.03~FEET;/;¿THENCE~SO "WEST/i~,P!STANC;~,O.~.326.i78~~ET4t\'J:H .. ç ,,,000006 Z?:'f,!;WEST, .¡A¡;DlSTAN'GE#Of,,~, . . , " THENCE~':NORTH(89Jo59'46~;¡WESH;;;-M;DISJ.. C "121.00 FEET. RETURNINGTO~THç.,~OINT;OF.'BEGINNI.,G CONTAINING 68.29 ACRES MORE OR lESS (location: North side of. Orange Avenue, approximately 1,800 feet east of the Florida Turnpike) --- -- 2. Bruce Neal, for a change in Zoning from IX (Industrial E~raction) Zoning District to IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning . District for the following described property: 31 34 40 NW 1/4 of NE 1/4 less Rd & Canal- (37.87 AC) (or 315-1202:376-759) (Tax Id. No, 1431-120-oo00~000/6) (location: South side ofSt. Lucie Boulevard, 'approxi-' mately 0.5 mile west of Sapp Road.).. "" .... ' 3. James and Shirley Cagle, for a chañge in Zoning from RS-3 (Resldeiitial,Single-Family,.,:3dU/acrp) r:t() 'PNRDi (Planned Non"Resldential Developmerit.lc..:,ZoiilngOistrict; tor the following describedpropei1Y:':":"~{ ;;~\,;- . . . . ....", ~.¡;"': -..; ..', .~,I:", ....,. ", " .. p.: _: ~ The N()rth 161~00 ·feet of the'.sOut/1ò,312;50:feetð(the NorthE1a~ (N,E;) 1/4 of the ·N()rU:YéåSt(N.Ei)"114iÔf SeCtIon 9. Township 36 South, Rangé'40~East;t'è¡¡saÌ1d Except therefore the West 279.00 feet,· and Less road right-of~ way for. Oleander Avenue (S.R...605).AlI belog,ándJying In St. LUCIe County,Rori~a. Containing J.2?',Øgf!!s' more or , less., ' ; '..~ .... ..;,~~.",.:.. ' '-:-,:' , ' c' ,(.1', .,~.- - . The East 119.00 feet of theWesf279:oote:eirbt:the North 156.2q feet of theSóuth ì312.5't'eetof¡.;ttì'ët;N.ortheast (N;E.) 1/4 of the NortheasqN,E.11140f.SèCf1Qlf9, Town" ship 36 South, Range 40 East~1 ,beln . g in st Lucie County, RoridãJCbr:ffåiniñ{f:OJ"43 . . ()re1f less. I. ."'.~"':';. t ..'··ò'··'· d,' ..j (Tax Id.3409~11H)()2(}()OÕíW:":>.:·'" t,,' :~"''',~ i ~:. '.-: ': _';'>"';:.:"'-< ::;",.;"""::'~~:..'J...~ ~ (Locati()n: 5615 Olea~der AÎlenû~) ·"~tJ !:,. , >1. ' .. " .". ."."" A PUBUC HEARING\vlil:bè,he1il'¡Ì1" ~ion Ç~ambers. 3.rd.. ft. oor. .Ò.f.·:th. e. ;ROger tlon ~.rlex... BUilding,., '~300y¡rølnl Fiorida¡on ·JuIy18;·.:2000"beglnni soon thereafter as poSsible:' '.':\ i.,. ... ::.:JL:··.:~!.·¡,..;.;",:" PURSOf\NT TO se'ctlOn~á6.01·· persond~c:lesto . iiPpeat,'aitý"deciSi() agency, ;or;commlssion ':, ered.. at..~:i¡ÎIeeti.... ... ng or,. h p~éIJng$'Md. that,'· ens reo at'averbatim· whi~\~fd!in.QlÚc:les ;tti'ê which .è'!i )peàllsto.tie' . , . .. ;.._.:iJ~'~.I;j~l~rlrt.. :;~)l.}j~~.;".'~_·;;;~):,-~.. it',: , ."(~!." BÖAaD~ÓRCOÙNThf . :'l\':"ISTtWGlêÇQU \ . :;ISI,JQti~iQ;1J PUBLlSHDÅt~f;jÜì~1f~:{ .. !1932558 .. . '.' ¡'f'é:- ~ \' b UJ'l (. , I, ,3NI:IO:l NO 11:13S ~ /1 c;a.Q 1:t3MtlO:l NO I1J3S ... AI:I01S 'US 313I:i:JNOJ JNIJ 31:tn1Jnl:l1S XJ018 3131:1:1HO:l S8:1 1H3M3^Yd ~O 3903 dl 1N3W3SY3 Al1111n '3'n tlOHJHY Ans ./ IN3N3Sv3 39VHIVI:IO , Al1111n 309fl 310d 1:13MOd OOOM J. 9NII:IV39 OI:lYOJ 9J ONnO:l 0 OI:lYOJ 9NOl :I 3N11I:I31N3:1 IN39NV1 1 0391:1n1SI0 (( JI:IV ~O H19N]1 V 319193111 ( I SnlOVtI 1:1 INIOd 031:139NnNNn (I Y1130 V 3:1N3:1 .,. 3^l:InJ .:10 IHIOd 'J 'd NOIIJ3S AJN39NYl .:10 lHIOd '1 'd 39NVtI 9NIN19938 .:10 lHIOd '9'0 'd dlHSNM01 lN3M3JN3HHOJ .:10 lNIOd 'J 'O'd AVM-.:I0-1H911:1 M¡ >lNVl Jlld3S 1'S OVOtI UNnOJ 'ij 9NI011ne '9018 OYOI:I 31V1S 'I 113M e tl3HI:IOJ 9NI011n9 >lI: VHHJN311 He tl3NtlOJ 3JM3.:1 dY:I :t 3dld NOI:II J:tdl 39Yd '! dY:I , 001:1 NOI:II J'I:II >1008 3InN I H '8 IN3HnNON 3:1N31:13.:131:1 IN3HYHtl3d Hl:ld >1009 OtlOJ31:1 lYIJl.:I.:IO 'In! 1NIOd 10tlINO:l IN3HVMI:I3d d:ld xooe IV1d '8 0011 NOli I 1:11 )looe 0330 '9 3dld NOI:II dl ViYO 1V1d IN3HnNOW 3131:1:1NO:l MJ 031:1nSY3H 13S .:10 0.:1 t6L2HSd :1'1:11 .9/5 0 ViVO 0330 IN3HnNOH 3131:1JNOJ @] Vi YO 031 vln:nv:¡ ON393' dYH NOI!Y:JOl IT¡ ,.to.., " ..........-- i.! .'.·....1 : I J I I J I , .!J ')0' ''2 ' '_o*, I .. ..,,-,_._--- --- ~ ~ - -- ------------------ - ------ - - - -~". - - --- - ~- ------~ -..-.--- -- -- -- ---- I , _1'. ,--f---_.- ..... "."' s:._·..,......· ..,w) '" ','''' .1'. lIS :II ., ..... .. (,,1_.....-...., () r 'I , ) r. ~ II P ] II I . I .. ~ . t .-- ".. ---.-...----.--- -.. .." ;; .-...-......) I , . \ I / ! ·..~~·n : \ :... ....ø,"''''':~ t~ "71 './'._....._...rJ: I- ] . -l- 't·..· r.,.·..."- : \...._--,----....\ 1 ' ~ ~ 'Ø ... (. tl ::... 1 ~ - --. --- - -- ---- ~~.~-::~~:~_:)_ __ _ _._ _ __ ~~. _ ___ '" h.. /-<::.-'" / .-,. .tTI..;'!I' 1"tI~SNI'''.· r ...,... ....."'.".) ..,II" "·"""'.i. " __,.".".."__.) or' r L!. T--..-- : ·....1.· -t .._._~,:,~ r:. ~..L"r "- Õ ---~-.. ----¡-;;;r--.. ...,'..... t. .... ~"." ... .~.. .. -........... ,,-.-.,....,-1- 11 '", 'to7':flJi.h'" ______M . 07/18/2000 17:21 5644683144 HERB BEACH p~~§.___~l, .__..... ...", ~~-' , _".pl'C¡ IICìt~1O . '. "-":...L. ='. In,a..-, ': .' . fr \...UOiiI'IIII ,Còde'of Qrdi· . naACH' ~ C<M.IntY Engi- nMrtc ad¥e\'tiSllwbidefor,çonatrUO- tlcn;. u6 tp p~1't an ¡n1i)rlooal ~..~.,. ~~.I.~~.~. ~ . tþ~ . p\&lt.tttMI'Y.nd I . b' ðt... ~'af\d." ehàna8 I '. r'-' the R8-S (ResideMlal. ,: zonmg·from ) dulacß}ZooirQ.o:tris::t ~~ (Pla\'ÌÍ'Iecf NOt:\.R~tl..1 DêV8IOP- ment - ~'s COW) zÞnlna DI$b1C:t ~ ~ to be knOWn Ii Cagle'. Øc/;r¿?~-ÆØ?$ ~~~> C~~)~ ¿~~ ~ð.?n-: M.4b- ß ..¿'d'--)L, 7 T'2-~~~-<?~'~ .~ . f7 ' /) j) -rI - L I d. T ð I' ....-J2ð"7~e /1"¿~.#1',t") qc>/,{ ,-~;Z' A /) .J - . ~ ~ i ~ ~~2-1- /JI4-:?/.~~-<..Yfi.P I'~øy, ~ dì/~ ~-~ ~ ~:e- U7~ -:e~~;;¡l1- ~a-. ~fi ¿;~~ ~Å. ~4C/,,~ ~~~/-ZL-. . ~L~ ~~..7ð µ--V<;U£~Æ--1 '-~- MA$-ð , e--~.-?-~~~~':~~-~ ~~.;7-Þa'/~ ~Y.::RR~ ~ .; ':J~ ~J;:~ ~-z::;;t.,a... ,- ~væcY-~ ~¿>~kß~ ~~~.. tI~~ 4~r~-dre>£~ øy-=>~~AR~ ~~od>ß~ ~~A-cy4, ~.~~.(yL Ie G{ ~í~Æ~--- / cJ~ ~) ~ r~·':¡'L- j) _ :.~¿~~?'~ v'òJrq~ '-' ----~~_.- ----'~._-- ----" ----"-- a.øe"'-OW FafIM J. tUI n JI V - tterbeñ J. aeach Aøgj$twrtd Notal)' Public 1012 s-ger Ave. Wt\hIt 0Itv. FL. ,..982 Wedd091 PerfaI rMd . ...~.. .---r- ~ J-~~" J ~~~.ßØ ~r ..., - - ';w )tt{ 1t-tm 6H TELEPHONE (561) 489·4901 BRUCE R. ABERNETHY, JR., P.A. ATTORNEY AT LAW 900 VIRGINIA AVENUE PROFESSIONAL CENTRE. SUITE 6 FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34982 E-MAIL bruceapaoaol.com TELEFAX (561) 489-4902 July 13,2000 VIA TELEFAX - 462-1581 AND MAIL Mr. David Kelly St. Lucie County Planning Department 2300 Virginia A venue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: Cagle's Cove Dear David: Enclosed please find a copy of correspondence dated July 12, 2000, issued by James Anderson, Environmental Supervisor, St. Lucie County Health Department. Following the discussion at the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, the Cagles engaged a certified septic tank contractor to prepare a system status report which was provided to the Department of Health. The Department of Health subsequently conducted an on site inspection and issued their determination that the system is operating sufficiently and that the proposed additional residents will not adversely affect the system. If you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. BRA/jIb Enclosure cc: Mrs.. Shirley Cagle ~-,.~-~-,.-~-_..............-----------:-'"-j : r¡' (ii" P [( r' '\ ; ~ t ~ !y: : :~ ¡!~ \ f¡ :: t ,._ ..-__,., ' ..--~ . f' ¡; ¡:\ ' JUL I 4 2000 : ¡ , , ~.--) . t " - ~- -- .~---,~--.-..-....".; , co ~_:(:;~·L~f:iº,:~:~t&:~~.'~_l._.J ST. LUCIE ChtJNTY HEALTH DEPARTMEN"t Jeb Bush Governor Robert G. Brooks, M.D. Secretary FLORIDA DEPARI'MENT OF July 12, 2000 James Cagle Cagle's Cove 5615 Oleander Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34950 RE: 5615 Oleander Avenue, Fort Pierce Permit # 56-SF-02390 Dear Mr. Cagle: -,,- _:. An inspection made on the above property on July 12, 2000 found the existing septic system appearing to be operating in a satisfactory manner. No sanitary nuisance or sign of septic system failure or stress was noted. The office has no objection to the zoning changes to the existing structure. This approval does not guarantee the future performance of the septic system and is valid for a period not to exceed thirty (30) days from the date of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact this office at {561} 873-4931. Sincerely, 11.-;) Jame derson Environmental Supervisor Irrb xc: file Environmental Health. Storage Tank 5150 NW Milner Drive. Port St Lucie FL 34983 Post Office Box 580 . Fort Pierce FL 34954-0580 (Mailing) (561) 873-4931. SC 245-4931. Fax (561) 873-4893 .... AGENDA REQUEST ..., ITEM NO. 5~ l DATE: 07/18/00 CONSENT REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg. [] Quasi-Jud. [X SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Dir. TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: petition of Roger Medema for a 12-month extension of the date of expiration contained within Resolution 98-144, Planned Development Site Plan Approval and Change in Zoning for property located on the north side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,800 feet east of the Florida Turnpike - Draft Resolution 00-122. BACKGROUND: The applicant was granted a Partial Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval in 1998. The applicant is seeking a 12 -month extension. Without such an extension, the site plan will expire on July 21, 2000. The reason cited for the extension is that developer of the project has been unable to secure appropriate financing. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission recommended approval of the preliminary PUD at its July 17, 1997, meeting. On August 19, 1997, the Board of County Commissioners granted approval for Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan Approval and a Change in Zoning from the PUD Zoning District to the PUD Zoning District. On July 21, 1998, this Board approved a Partial Final Planned Development Site Plan and a Change in zoning. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Draft Resolution 00-122, approving the extension of the Planned Development Site Plan approval and a Change in Zoning from the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club - MHP) zoning District. ] APPROVED [X DENIED [ ] OTHER: Motion to Deny 3-2 (Lewis, Hutchinson) COMMISSION ACTION: k Review and Approvals County Attorney. Management ~ Budget. Purchasing: Originating Department. Finance. (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Other. Other. '-" ....., COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: July 18,2000 Resolution 00-122 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Community Development Director Date: July 12, 2000 Subject: Petition of Roger Medema for a 12-month extension of the Planned Development Site Plan Approval and a Change in Zoning fÌ"om the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club - MHP) Zoning District. The Board of County Commissioners, through Resolution 98-144, granted Partial Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval and a change in zoning from the PUD (planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club) Zoning District to the PUD (planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes Club - MHP) Zoning District. The date of expiration of the planned development site plan is July 21, 2000. The developer of the project is requesting a 12-month extension in order to secure appropriate financing. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 00-122, which, if approved, would grant this request for an extension of the date of expiration. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 00-122. SUBMITTED: å J?L£L lia I. Shewchuk, AICP ommunity Development Director hf cc: Roger Medema J.P. Terpening, P.E. Richard Ladyko, P.E. File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 '-" -...I RESOLUTION 00-122 FILE NO.: FILE NO: BCC-OO-O05IRZ-97-004ISP-98-0211 BCC-98-007 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A 12-MONTH EXTENSION OF THE DATE OF EXPIRATION FOR FINAL PLANNED DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR PHASE I OF THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS PALM BREEZES CLUB - MHP - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT, AND A CHANGE IN ZONING FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Roger Medema, presented a petition for a 12-month extension of the date of expiration for Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for Phase I of the project to be known as Palm Breezes Club - MHP - Planned Unit Development, and a Change in Zoning for property located on the north side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,800 feet east of the Florida Turnpike. 2. On July 21, 1998, this Board held a public hearing and voted to grant, through Resolution 98-144, Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for Phase I of the project to be known as Palm Breezes Club - MHP - Planned Unit Development, and a Change in Zoning for certain property. 3. The date of expiration for Resolution 98-144 is July 21,2000. 4. This Board held a public hearing on July 18, 2000, on the petition after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida: A. The residential development to be known as Palm Breezes Club - MHP - Planned Unit Development is hereby granted a 12-month extension to July 21,2001. File No.: BCC-OO-005/RZ-97-004/SP-98-021/BCG-98-007 July 18, 2000 Resolution 00-122 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 '-' ....., B. All the terms, findings, and conditions otherwise cited in Resolution 98-144, approved on July 21, 1998, are hereby incorporated by reference in Resolution 00-122. C. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director, the St. Lucie County Public Works Director, the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority Director, and the St. Lucie County Leisure Services Director are hereby authorized to amend all public records on file in their respective offices to reflect the new date of expiration. All other affected parties are authorized to make the necessary changes to recognize this new date of expiration. D. A copy of this resolution shall be retained in the petition file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman John D. Bruhn xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX Vice-Chairman Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Cliff Barnes PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 18th Day of July 2000. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney hf H:\WP\RESOLUTI.N\FINISHED.2000\PBClub.PD\PBClubRevRES.wpd File No.: BCC-00-005/RZ-97-004/SP-98-021/BCC-98-Q07 July 18, 2000 Resolution 00-122 Page 2 VtNTURA CLUB, IN~ 3500 W. Lantana Road · Lantana, Florida 33462 · (561) 433-8223 . Fax: (561) 969-6292 Via Airborne Express April 26, 2000 Mr. David Kelly 81. Lucie County Community Development Dep1. Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue F1. Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Re: Extension of Resolution #98-144 Palm Breezes Club MHP, PUD Dear Mr. Kelly: Please consider this letter formal application for a one year extension for zoning approval on the above referenced property. The application/extension fee of $500.00 is included herein. We have applied for HUD financing on this project, and the volume of detail work and delays in processing by the Department of Housing and Urban Development have caused delays far beyond our expectations, W7 appreciate your assistance in this matter. Ii / y' sine IV / /¡ 'tþger E. Medema V President enclosures c: Culpepper & Terpening, Inc., Agent (w/out enc.) f·i"·;;~I·-~.;-~0)---R~.n -~.r¡-~::-:\ fin r~~ :,d~ -<;i "f ;.~. ~;"'¡( " r-'-~ --ÿ APR 2 7 ' ::rr - '-' ..."" ..Q ~ ____ z :J L- on ~ E ~ 0 -' .. 0.... c: -' E L.() .. on E >, 0 e,'" 0 (J) CJ) (J) ~ c: 0 0 0 ~ Q) .. 0 N "'0 E I > .- r-: t N .. -' u (J) 0 0 '" ., '" . Q) E ~ ~ 0 >," u Q) :r: ~.2 ~ I L- c: c: ~ L- OJ ~ " - G . 0 "- u Q) Q) E " ~ E:;¡ "- 0) 0 (, o e, "- ,; ..Q u ., G 0 E OJ .. :z 0 toO a: \ (, 0 ~ '\ .. ~ ~ 0.... 2 ... ... .. ... a: ~ Z ;:) ~ 0 () z >. c ;:) 0 t 0 () II: Q):'¡::; ~ o..~ i ! ä: o 0 ! ... z "- 0 ; ... ~ :!! D..--.J ;¡¡ ! co I ... <{ a: Ii 0\'011 anNS ::¡: Z a: <{ is ~.) ~ 6; s St 1 ... ... : to ... i Ii to .., a: S tt 1 S " 1 , A1Nno~ 3380H~33)10 ~ '-' ""'" A petition by Roger Medema (James P. Terpening, Agent) for a 12 month extension of Planned Unit Development (PUD) for Palm Breezes Club Mobile Home Park Subject parcel is shaded below. . I CO) ~\ Community Development ! Geographic Information Systems f N BCC 00-005 Map prepared July 7,2000 This map has been compiled for general planning and reference purposes only. While e:very effort has been made to provide the most current and accurate information possible. It is not intended for use as a legally binding document. Scale: 1" = 900' '-" .-...1 Roger Medema Palm Breezes Club Mobile Home Park Zoning AG-1 AR-1 RS-4 AR-1 RM-5 RS-4 . I u CJ Community Development ! Geographic Information Systems r N Bee 00-005 Map prepared July 7, 2000 This map has been compiled for general planning and reference purposes only. While fINery effort has been made to provide the most current and accurate information possible. it is not intended for use as a legally binding document. Scale: 1" = 900' Palm '-" 'wi Roger Medema Breezes Club Mobile Home Park Land Use AG-5 RS P IF . I T IU C-J BCC 00-005 Community Development 1 Geographic Information Systems f N Map prepared July 7,2000 This map has been compiled for general planning and reference purposes only. While f1Very effort has been made to provide the most current and accurate information possible. It is not intended for use as a legally binding document. Scale: 1" = 900' . rI) t~ 00- == -§ 0_ ~U = ~ e N $.0 ~ cS ~ == $.0 ~~ ,C, e ' .... ¡.c: _ g.= e~ ~e ø~ . ~ ....~ 5 $.0 e ~ ~~ I ~ $.0 ~cS ~II) ~= ....= .... . === == e · ee o~ U $.0 ~cS ........ == .~ ~~ e ~ t: == == g. .... ~ = ~::E ~ .... ii .s ¡L~ =, =i Q\ ........' t' i <1) <1) <1)1 <1) IU U uiU J Ð Ð i)~ ~ ! ii: ii: ii: ¡ ii: It: t:it:1 ¡ 0 0' 01 t!::<>&~E::<! I Ii ¡ ^ II ....1 U~I nUl ;~..^~»>J,. ¡¡ n n ¡¡ 1'.1.1.1.. ¡ 11 o ...... 2 (/.) ....:I CI:I .a ã ã ¡g (/.)(/.) .... ,.!:; B '" == '" U2 U2 U2 .~ .ª 2 !£3!£3S g¡ è§è§è§ '" .... U ~j (/.) E;;; ~ CL>:'= ~:= ......:3: .... o ~.s::: B QQ~ §~ _~~~~~~~~§~MV~~§~~~§~~~~§~ ~~ #§§ §88§§§8~§~§~~~~§§§§§§8§§§§§§§ 8~~ N~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~~Ñ~Ñ~~~~N~ ......ON......OOOO......OONN~OOOO~~~ON~O......~~............~o ~~N~~~~~~~~N~N~~~~N......-~N-~~N-......--~ ~oo_o_......_o~__ooo----ooooOO-OOON~OO =~~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oo~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN NNNNNNNN 1:1) j~ ~~ 00 ==,.Q 0': ;:u ~ ~ e N ~ ~ cS ~ == ~ Þ-C~ .~ e .c_ ~~ f~ gfe -~ ~ ~1 ..:.~ 5 ~ e ~ ~o .s~ ~ ~ ~cS ~It' ;;...$2 .... - .... I === == e I e~ o~ U ~ ~cS ........ == .~ ~~ e Þ.Q 1:: == == ~ .... ~ ~ ~~ =11 S:li ~ìì t"- ~ ~ ¡¡ iì 10 o r-- ~~ e .§ ~ c: Z~ tf') ~ e r3 ~~ <lI 5 ..c: B CI') ~ ~ ]] u u CI')CI') ~ o )-< ~ ~ oø.. ZZ ~~~ ~]] .... ~ ~ z ~ææ ~o~ ~'5 9 â..c:i3 ~u< .Ë ¡:¡ 0 gu u""" .....-(............ ~ ...... 1~<lI ...uu..... 5 u .g u .~ ~ c: !:t:: U <IS <IS ~·E~]]]~:3~.gE9~ II~~~ uu·~uu_.....:::s....:I »:>:> ø..ø..~CI')CI') Cl')CI')CI')CI') pp)-< §§§§§~§§§~§~~~~§§§~ ë~~~~!¡~~~i~~~~~~~~ª~ oo~oo~~oo~~~~oo-~~~--~oo ~ OOO__O_M_OOOO~~OOOO = ~~~~~~~o~~~~~oo~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ MMM~M~~MMMMMMMMMMMM .....,¡ ~T. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA f; . July 18.2000 . TO WHo'M IT MAY CONCERN: \.t'., ( NOTICE is t¡ereby given in accordance with Section '\ 11.00.03 of the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code and in accordance with the provisions of the St Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicant has requested that the St Lucie County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: 1. Petition of Roger Medema for a 12-month extension of 1/ a Partial Final Planned Development Site Plan approval for . the project known as Palm Breezes Club MHP - Planned Unit Development, and a Change in Zoning from the RM-5 J (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes) Zoning District for the following described property: 1 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP -' 35 SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORI- DA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS .' FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE:'" SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER l~ OF SAID SECTION 10. TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST; THENCE, NORTH 890059'46' EAST ALONG THE C SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION,~ 10, A DISTANCE OF 793.96 FEET: THENCE NORTH %' 000000'14' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 85.00 FEET TO THE.~ POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE, NORTH' ( ()00()6'22' -~! EAST, A DISTANCE OF 465.00 FEET; THENCE, SOUTH';t· 890059'46' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 793.80 FEET TO THE ¡11 WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID 'ifi SECTION 10: THENCE, NORTH 000006'22', EAST ALONG , THE WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF.SEC' TION 10, A DISTANCE OF 789.15 FEELTO THE SO . LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER 'OF THE NOR.,. WEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 1 O;.THENCE NO~m..··· 890052'47' WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE 'OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTH.W. EST QUAR~.' A DISTANCE OF 509.36 FEET;' THENCE, NORTtI 1 000007'13' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 75.86·FEET; THENCe NORTH 210012'38' WEST, A DISTANCE.· OF 90.00 FE5Ji THENCE, NORTH 700007'13' WEST, A DISTANCE',,' . 55.54 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 240012'25' WEST, ,A D' TANCE OF 115.23 FEET TO A POINT ,OgN.ON-TANG INTERSECTION·· WITH A CURVE CONCAVE TO ~ NORTHWEST A RADIAL TO SAID POINT'BEARS,NOR 240012'25':WEST,HAVING ARADIUS,OE390.00 FEet;' THENCE, WESTERLY ALONG SAID CU.RVE THROUGKA CENTRAL ANGLE OF 030041 '47', AN ARC DISTANCE";O~ 25.16 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 350008'23'tWEST;':A~;DIS;! TANC.E Of 124.86 FEET; THENCE.<NO.RTH 51~'O~41~ . WEST, A DISTANCE OF 36.82 FEET{'.'!¡.)THEN. C~NORTH ." 300044'10~dWEST, A DISTANCE 0f'i9s:00 FE~..;~TO ,A ,. NON-TANGENT INTERSECTION WITHA:OUR~()N6AVE TO THE NORTHWEST, A RADIAL rOSAID POINT:SEARS NORTH 300044'10' WEST, AND.HAVING;Ä:JOO:)IUSO 37.50 FEET; . THENCE,· EASTERL y,;;~l"ONGSAlD' CURVE THROUGH. A CENTRAL ANGEL.OF.,¡tf4~14'5!r, ANAR , DISTANCe .OF 9.33. FEET, TO A P.()INr.OFJNTERSECno WITH.A~OMPOUND CURVEfiHAVING.,:A,RAQIU J. 387.50 FEET;.THENCE, NO. RTH~R. ~.)'lmißOU~ .", TRAL ''AN'GEl'' OF ·960046'03.,'AN;'iARC;¡¡[)ISJ; 654.45 FEET; THENCE;.NORTH 3Soö14'4T' EAST;)', TANCE OF 12MOfEET; :JHENC~vNOR1'H!'~.· ~; .' EAST,A DISTANCE OF 136:7f 'FEt: I ;:J:.HENcE;:SQ 890044'42' EAST,A DISTANCE,OF.764~ß8:'FEe:Nro. WEST LlI' IE OFTHE.NORTHEAST"QUARTER;..., . souTH '. Qpoo06'22' WEST" 'ALONG 'tHE· WESt THE NORTHEAST QUARTER, A~DISJANCE. FEET; THENCE, SOUTH 890044'42'EAST, A DI 62.41 FEET TO A 'POINT OF CURVAtURE OF CONCAVÈ TO THE'SOUTHWESTiHAVING A', 70.00 FEET; THENCE, SOUTHEASTERLY TI'I CENTRAL ANGLE OF 610016'19',.AN ARCDI " 74.86 fEET; THE~CE, SOUTH.,280028'21~¡Ç.' ... /' ;;~'ql TANCE OF 67.84 FEET; THENCE, SOU,\IJ~,!89àC!59, EAST, A DISTANCE OF ~89.92FEET TO AP.OINT!OFCU VATURE OF KCURVECONOAVE TO T UTH JiAVING A EiAOWSOF25:òOriFEET;.',T'c, so 'tASTERL1f1:THROUGWA"GENTAL ANGLE 1i0ö30,'. EAST, ~...' ;MRC" DISTAN.C. .Ei';'(. ;.. OE 26.84i", . ..';'::J.JHENC . SOUTHI8C;¡;28'24' EAST·'!Aft)ISTANC ·E' ..G4~ r'THENcg;. . Ø~RTH61~t~6'EAST~ ... ' IST~.IO~ 141.00. .. ET, . THENGE'N$OUTH 2800~ ,. ,'Ii; TANCE"OF 130.00 'FEET.:~tTHENCE1EOßTH '61~ . EAST. ' J~~\'!DISTANCg;(OF.r.f18;58 FEE1j' .ENCE. r P' "'32ci:.30'01' EAST~;;p.'.DISTANCE OF~ÔP. t~.. ;~ ..·NORTH61 0031~36'1!¡::'ÄST' A DISTÄNCE~OF:35;09 "'{THENCE, . SOUTH!,:~l;3b'01' ,,\EAST~;¡\" D.I5t'· . ;515.40f.EET;itTHENCe~iSOUTH (()~':32" . . .; TANCE tOE· 98a;Q31ÍFEET; .: THENCE~SOUTHí'S9; ,¡.WEST,1A.P.IST A~C7'. O~! 32.6. 78jEEET.;:"'JHE.N.C&1S0 ,,!OOoo06 22j..WEST, ,·A, DISTANCE~OFA65.00i*FE , THENCE(¡':NORTH890i.59'46' ·WEST:.;A~DISTANC '. 121.00 FEET, RETURNINGTOTHEf!OINT;OE'BEGINNI..Ø .."J CONTAINING 68.29 ACRES MORE OR LESS (Location: North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,8_00 feet east of the Florida Turnpike) ~------- 2. Bruce Neal, for a change in Zoning from IX (Industrial E~ra.ction) Zoning D~strict to IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District for the following described property: 31 34 40 NW 1/4 of NE 1/4 less Rd & Canal- (37.87 AC) (or 315-1202:376-759) (Tax Id. No. 1431-120-0000;000/6) (Location: South side of St. Lucie,' Boulevard ·approxi- ~ matelyO.5 mile west of Sapp Road.),' .' .<.;,'.. ..... ......'. ~" ' ' " ~ . ' 3. James and Shirley Cagle, for a charige 1i1 Zoning from RS-3 (Residential,· Single-Famllyi.<3diJIaCrIlVtoPNRDi (Planned Non-Residential Developm.e. ntFZòn. ¡no. :DIstrict i' for the followingdescribedprop~rty: ""<0;~'{,r;1';'';'" .' . '-',I"! ,": ," ·._.._..·.,.,:,).7' ',"'.,'" .....'..-.. 1 The North' 161,.()0 feet of the;.s~~m;,áji50"fe,~{~f'1he~ North~ast (N.E.) 1/4 of theNortiTea,sti(N;E.t)~14;'ofSectlon .~ 9. Township 36 South, Rangè40East;u$Sand Except '1 therefore the West 279.00 feet, and Lessi'oad rig/)t-of-, way for. Oleander Aven.ue (S.R'ø605)"AUbèlog.~dJYing J.' j St. Lucie County, Honda. ContainlngJ.27 acres moreo! less.., ' . . .. ,'~",,·.:':r?:t'._;: The East 119.00 feet of the We~t279:00fe'ét:bHíie North i 156.25 feet of the South 312.51'feetoC . l~orth ¡t (N:E.) 1/4 of the Northeast (N,E.}114.0t, ." '9, ToWlb I e.3.f.o~~~~' ~;r?;:~'~.i.·~.:..~,:~g~~~ .~...g..ol~.)1ì. '1 11 (Tax Id:3409-111-OO20-000l1f~_' \ :..~:::::<: ," ,....:...--.-. ·'.~._.~i-".~<V't::'_, (locatiion: 5615 Olea~der Ayenû~):. .:, .¡ :: 'f," '. .. _.' -"-' - ~ A PUBLic HEARING 'will be. hllldt' nìm'a~ ~ ~Ion Cl;Jambers. 3rdfloor.ofthe.Ró ml6lstra~ ò tlon ~,neX_Bu.ildlng.,2300.'.VI.rg.lni ~Plêíì.. é~J Florid8! ,on ;July18,)2000, '!begln j:1)f,~ soon thereafter aa posalblll..' . ·",·;,r(~"' ¡-:,._, .;'<'J:;-~-:_'-' -\-k" . ._ PURSUÂNT TO sectlon'286.0105,' person deçldes to appealai1y"dec\s agency,orcommlsslon with re~ ered at ¡"meeting or heatlrJð'~he pro~p'Ió'Ø$, ,and that, fp(sU ensu.re!that·a\'erbatim reco whlcli~irë(;Oì'd ?Inclúde$ . the ,'.téStlm . which ftie' .ppeàllstö tie'báse '" ...,'.. '" !f~~/;j/t'~rij'~'(. _.:¡:'oJ;:ç,-: ).::.--- ~1"'\ :_~ ':c;~\ , BOAROfoFCOÙNl?tf' .,' j. .'" '-'IST:WCIECOO I ";~JJpH~!p.:~aJJ PUBLI~HDÁ~i~J~\f~jd~"; , 11932558 ... '." . I"rc.. ~ \'bun(. ~ '-" AGENDA REQUEST ~EM NO. 5-:) DATE: 07/18/00 CONSENT REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg. [] Quasi -Jud. [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: - cPL~' SUBMITTED BY: Communi tv Development SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: [ X] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: County Attorney, ~ originating Department, Finance, (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Request for Rezoning of Property located on the south side of St. Lucie Boulevard, approximately 0.5 mile west of Sapp Road from the IX (Industrial, Extraction) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District - Draft Resolution 00-118 Petition of Bruce Neal, for a Change in Zoning from the IX (Industrial, Extraction) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District. The stated purpose of the rezoning is to allow the subject property to be developed for industrial uses. (File No.: RZ-OO-006) N/A The Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 5 to 0, with four members (Mr. Trias, Mr. McCurdy, Mr. Moore, and Mr. Hearn) absent, recommended approval of the rezoning at its June 15, 2000, meeting. Approve Draft Resolution 00-118 changing the zoning from the IX (Industrial, Extraction) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District for property located on the south side of St. Lucie Boulevard, approximately 0.5 mile west of Sapp Road. DENIED gl s M. Anderson Administrator Review and Approvals Management & Budget, Purchasing. Other. Other, \.f .....,¡ COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: July 18,2000 Resolution 00-118 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT From: Boar Of~unJf¿:m~ Co unity Development Director To: Date: Subject: Petition of Bruce Neal, for a Change in Zoning from the IX (Industrial, Extraction) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District. (File No.: RZ-OO-OO6) The proposed rezoning of property located on the south side of St. Lucie Boulevard, approximately 0.5 mile west of Sapp Road from the IX (Industrial, Extraction) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District is to allow for the use of the subject property for industrial uses. The subject site is the location of a discontinued mining operation and is required to be changed to another zoning district as a part of the reclamation of the mine. At the June 15, 2000, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 5 to 0, with four members (Mr. Trias, Mr. McCurdy, Mr. Moore, and Mr. Hearn) absent, recommended approval of this petition. This proposed rezoning meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 00-118, which, if approved, would grant this request for a change in zoning from the IX (Industrial, Extraction) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District. Staff recommends the approval of this petition as set forth in Draft Resolution 00-118. SUBMITTED: Julia J. s~, AICP CommunIty Development Director hf cc: Bruce Neal File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 \..f -.....I RESOLUTION 00-118 FILE NO.: RZ-OO-O06 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE IX (INDUSTRIAL, EXTRACTION) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE Il (INDUSTRIAL, LIGHT) ZONING DISTRICT FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. lUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Bruce Neal. presented a petition for a Change in Zoning from the IX (Industrial, Extraction) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District for the property described in Part A below. 2. On June 15, 2000, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the hereafter described request for a change in zoning from the IX (Industrial, Extraction) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District for the property described below. 3. On July 18, 2000, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 4. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 5. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the existing and proposed use of property in the surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. The proposed change in the Zoning District Classification for that property described as follows: File No.: RZ-00-006 July 18, 2000 Resolution 00-118 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 '-' .""", THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 31, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST - LESS THE NORTH 98 FEET - LYING IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA (Tax ID#: 1431-120-0000-000/6) (Location: South side of St. Lucie Boulevard, approximately 0.25 mile west of Sapp Road) owned by Bruce Neal is hereby changed from the IX (Industrial, Extraction) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District. B. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the change to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman John D. Bruhn xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX Vice-Chairman Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Cliff Bames PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 18th Day of July 2000. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney hf H:\WP\RESOLUTI.N\FINISHED.OO\Neal.RZ\NeaIRES.wpd File No.: RZ-00-006 July 18, 2000 Resolution 00-118 Page 2 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: LOCATION: EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: FUTURE LAND USE: PARCEL SIZE: PROPOSED USE: PERMITTED USES: (\., l...., PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 06/15/00 File Number RZ-00-006 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning and Zoning Commission rfJL Planning Manager \þ '\ June 9, 2000 Application of Bruce Neal, for a Change in Zoning from the IX (Industrial, Extraction) Zoning District to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District. South side of St. Lucie Boulevard, approximately 0.5 mile west of Sapp Road. IX (Industrial, Extraction) IL (Industrial, Light) IND (Industrial) 37.87 acres 23.82 - Land 14.05 - Water Industrial Uses Attachment "A" - Section 3.01.03(T) IL (Industrial, Light) - contains the designated uses which are pennitted by right, pennitted as an accessory use, or pennitted through the conditional use process. Any use designated as a "Conditional Use" is required to undergo further review and approvals. Any use not found within the zoning district regulations are designated as prohibited uses for that district IL to the south, east, and west. IX to the southeast. CG (Commercial, General), RMH-5 (Residential, Mobile Home - 5 du/acre), and U (Utilities) to the north across St. Lucie Boulevard. SURROUNDING ZONING: '-' ..,.; June 9, 2000 Page 2 Petition: Bruce Neal File No.: RZ-00-006 SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general eXIstmg use surrounding the property is industrial. There is a non-conforming single family residence to the south. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is Industrial. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #4 (4000 St. Lucie Boulevard), IS located approximately 0.5 mile to the east. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property is in the FPUA utility service area. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way for St. Lucie Boulevard is 80 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Concurrency Deferral Affidavit. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions ofthe St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed zoning district is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. ~ "-' June 9, 2000 Page 3 Petition: Bruce Neal File No.: RZ-00-006 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The proposed change in zoning is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The Industrial Land Use allows the IL Zoning District. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The proposed zoning is consistent with existing and proposed land uses in the area. The general use of the immediate surrounding area of the subject property is industrial. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; The mining operation is no longer active. No other use is allowed in the IX Zoning District. A rezoning of the property to another zoning district designation is, therefore, required. 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; The intended use for this rezoning is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. Prior to the approval of any proposed development, the applicant will need to provide documentation verifying that sufficient facilities are in place to support the development. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The applicant will be required to comply with all federal, state, and local environmental regulations. ~ ....., June 9, 2000 Page 4 Petition: Bruce Neal File No.: RZ-00-006 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; An orderly and logical development pattern will occur with this change in zoning. The surrounding parcels of property are designated for industrial uses. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. COMMENTS The petitioner, Bruce Neal, has requested this change in zoning ftom the IX (Industrial, Extraction) to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District in order to develop the property with industrial uses. The subject site is the location of a discontinued mining operation and is required to be changed to another zoning district as a part of the reclamation of the mine. Attached is a copy of Section 3.01.03(T) - IL (Industrial, Light), of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, which delineates the pennitted, accessory, and conditional uses allowed in the Industrial Light Zoning District. If the change in zoning request is approved, the applicant, by right, would be allowed to establish any of the uses under the Permitted Uses section. Any use under the Accessory Uses section would be allowed only if one or more of the pennitted uses exists on the subject property. Any use under the Conditional Uses section could only be allowed if it first receives approval through the Board of County Commissioners. Staffhas reviewed this petition and detennined that it conforms with the standards of review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment hf cc: Bruce Neal File '-' ...., Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations v. !X. INDUSTRIAL. EXTRACTION 1 . Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for the extraction of natural resources from the ground, together with such other uses as may be necessary to and compatible with industrial extraction surroundings. The number in "0" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Mining and quarrying of nonmetallic minerals, except fuels. (14) b. Mobile food vendors. (999) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. 6. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00. 7. Conditional Uses a. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999) 8. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following: a. Detached single-family dwelling unit or mobile home, for on-site security purposes. (999) Adopted August 1, 1990 129 Revised Through 09107/99 '-' ..." Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations F. RE-1 RESIDENTIAL. ESTATE - 1 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for single-family dwellings at a maximum gross density of one (1) dwelling unit per acre, together with such other uses as may be necessary for and compatible with low density residential surroundings. The number in "0" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Family day care homes. (999) b. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1,000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) notifies the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. (999) c. Single-family detached dwellings. (999) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking Requirements Off-street parking requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.06.00. 6. Conditional Uses a. Bed & Breakfast Residences - Subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.20. (999) b. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1,000) feet of another such family residential home. (999) c. Landscaping & Horticultural Services (078) d. Veterinary Services. (074) e Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999) 7. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and including the following: , a. Guest house subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.04. (999) b. Horses, subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.03. (999) c. Retail and wholesale trade - subordinate to the primary authorized use or activity. Adopted August 1, 1990 103 Revised Through 09107/99 '-' "" Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations T. !.!:.. INDUSTRIAL. LIGHT 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for light manufacturing, wholesale, and warehousing activities that do not impose undesirable noise, vibration, odor, dust, or other offensive effects on the surrounding are, together with such other uses as may be necessary to and compatible with light industrial surroundings. The number in "0" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Business services (73) b. Communications - including telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (48) c. Construction services: (1) Building construction - general contractors (15) (2) Other construction - general contractors (16) (3) Construction - special trade contractors (17) d. Engineering, architectural and surveying services (871) e. Commercial fishing (091) f. Laundry, cleaning & garment services (721) g. Local & suburban transit (41) h. Manufacturing: (1) Food and kindred products (20) (2) Tobacco products (21) (3 ) Textile mill products (22) (4) Apparel & other finished products (23) (5) Furniture & fixtures (25) (6) Printing, publishing and allied industries (27) (7) Drugs (283) (8) Leather & leather products (31) (9) Glass: (a) Flat glass (321) (b) Glass & glassware - pressed or blown (322) (c) Glass products - made of purchased glass (323) (10) Fabricated metal prod. - except machinery & transport. equip.: (a) Metal cans & shipping containers (341) (b) Cutlery, handtools & general hardware (342) (c) Heating equipment, except electric and warm air, and plumbing fixtures (343) (d) Fabricated structural metal products (344) (e) Coating, engraving & allied services (347) (f) Miscellaneous fabricated metal products - (1 ) Wire products (3495) (2) Misc. fabricated wire products (3496) (3) Metal foil & leaf (3497) (4) Fabricated metal products - NEC (3499) (11) Industrial/commercial machinery & computer equipment: (a) Metalworking machinery & equipment (354) (b) Special industry machinery, except metalworking machinery (355) (c) General industrial machinery & equipment (356) (d) Computers & office equipment (357) Adopted August 1, 1990 121 Revised Through 09/07/99 '-' \wi Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations (12) Electronic & other electrical equipment and components, except computer equipment: (a) Household appliances (363) (b) Electric lighting & wiring equipment (364) (c) Household audio & video equipment (365) (d) Communications equipment (366) (e) Electronic components & accessories (367) (f) Misc. electrical machinery equipment & supplies (369) (13) Measuring, analyzing and controlling instruments (38) (14) Photographic, medical and optical goods (38) (15) Watches & clocks (38) (16) Misc. manufacturing industries: (a) Jewelry, silverware, and platedware. (391) (b) Musical instruments and parts. (393) (c) Dolls, toys, games & sporting goods (394) (d) Pens, pencils, & other office & artists' materials. (395) (e) Costume jewelry, costume novelties, and notions. (396) (f) Brooms and brushes. (3991) (g) Signs and advertising displays. (3993) (h) Morticians goods. (3995) (i) Manufacturing industries, NEC. (3999) (17) Plastic products - fabrication, molding, cutting, extrusion, and injection processing. (308) i. Marinas (4493) j. Millwork and structural wood members. (243) k. Motion pictures (78) I. Motor freight transportation & warehousing. (42) m. Repair services: (1) Automotive & automotive parking (75) (2) Electrical (762) (3) Watch, clock & jewelry repair (763) (4) Reupholstery & furniture repair (764) (5) Misc. repairs & services (769) n. Retail trade: (1) Lumber & other building materials (521) (2) Paint, glass & wallpaper (523) (3) Hardware (525) (4) Nurseries, lawn & garden supplies (526) (5) Mobile home dealers (527) (6) Automotivelboat/RV/motorcycle dealers (55) (7) Gasoline service" (55) (8) Furniture & furnishings (57) o. Research, development, and testing services. (873) p. Ship, boat building & repairing -less than forty-five (45) ft. (373) q. Sorting, grading & packaging services - citrus/vegetables (0723) r. Vocational Schools (824) s. Wholesale trade - durable goods: (1) Motor vehicle and automotive equipment. (501) (2) Furniture and home fumishings.(502) (3) Lumber and other building materials. (503) (4) Professional & commercial equipment/supplies. (504) (5) Metals & minerals except petroleum. (505) (6) Electrical goods. (506) Adopted August 1, 1990 122 Revised Through 09/07/99 '-' '" Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations (7) Hardware, plumbing and heating equipment, and supplies. (507) (8) Machinery, equipment, and supplies. (508) (9) Misc. durable goods: (a) Sporting and recreational goods (5091) (b) Toys & hobby goods (5092) (c) Jewelry, watches, precious stones & metals. (5094) (d) Durable goods NEC (5099) t. Wholesale trade - nondurable goods: (1) Paper and paper products. (511) (2) Drugs (512) (3) Dry goods and apparel. (513) (4) Groceries and related products. (514) (5) Farm products - raw materials. (515) (6) Chemicals, and allied products. (516) (7) Beer, wine, and distilled alcoholic beverages. (518) (8) Misc. nondurable goods: (a) Farm supplies (5191) (b) Books, periodicals & newspapers (5192) (c) Flowers, nursery stock & florists' supplies (5193) (d) Tobacco/tobacco products (5194) (e) Paints, varnishes & supplies (5198) (f) Nondurable goods, NEC (5199) u. Mobile food vendors (999) v. Single family detached dwelling units provided that the single family dwelling unit is located on an existing lot or parcel or record, as further defined in this code, that was existing on or before August 1, 1990. (999ì 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 5. Offstreet Parking and Loading Requirements Offstreet parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. 6. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00. 7. Conditional Uses a. Airports, landing and takeoff fields - general aviation (4581) b. Manufacturing: (1) Cut stone and stone products. (328) (2) Motorcycles, bicycles, and parts. (375) (3) Wood containers, wood buildings and mobile homes. (244/245) c. Ship, boat building & repairing (excluding ship or boat salvaging) - Forty-five (45) to one- hundred fifty (150) ft (373) d. Wholesale: Adopted August 1, 1990 123 Revised Through 09107/99 \.f ~ Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations (1) Petroleum bulk stations and terminals. e. Scrap and waste materials - subject to the provisions of Section 7.10.12.A. 8. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00 and include the following: a. Co-generation facilities. (999) b. Fueling facilities. (999) c. Industrial wastewater disposal. (999) d. One detached single-family dwelling or mobile home for on-site security purposes per property. (999) e. Retail trade accessory to the primary manufacturing or wholesaling use. (999) Adopted August 1, 1990 124 Revised Through 09/07/99 :a '-" OKEECHOBEE COUNTY 'w1I T 35 S T 34 S ... ... ¡ ¡ :a ... ... '" '" ~ z ~ CoM 0 I 5> z ~ :a SNEED ROAD I :a CARLTON ROAD » t : t :D .. -j = '" Z '" i i :D ! <: m :D () RANCE UIE ROAD 0 C () Z ~ 0 c z ~ :a :a '" '" . o C1 II 0 .. I: ., n I: .. II ... '" 0 '!: :>'3 D .. D3 ... J ~ _c ~ .. ="2- ¡ Q, o ... n .. .,,< . ~ 3 c n II II ~ to ::: < ? 0 II ft to :;I Õ 0 en'" 0 0 '< 3 .. II "':;1 9 ... .. Z ---- I \ \. \ \. ') 0 :IJ OJ ') N .., .. C " () 0 CD 0 I Z 0 0 CD 0) p) ( '. A petition of Bruce Neal for a Change In Zoning from IX (Industrial, Extraction) to IL (Industrial, Light). œ~= ED ~ . 7 ~y Lane tlJ! · 7 t I > , '0 o o tr '0 C o E E o J: (l. J' . \ I ' , I \ ' ,I ~ .- IVI i í , I I , , I I , , I I , . I I . , I 1__, F. P. F. D. D. Canal No. 26 St. Lucie Boulevard ,',-----------------------" / ì I , I I { ; I , I I , , I I I , I I , . I 1 í ¡ I . I I i ¡ i ì I , I I , . J I j i , , \ I , ' ',_________,,_______---------J RZ 00-006 . Community Development t Geographic Information Systems Map prepared April 24, 2000 . . 1hII np'" bMn ~ ............... Met ................ anIy. N ¥HI ..., eIIort... bNn ... to ~ I'll ....II:U'M'II Md IC:IC&mI .......... .......... nac........ Iar... . . ~ bh:tng dcx:ai'nMt V/ /d This. pattern indicates subject parcel ( (, Zoning œ~= BB ~ Amy Lane t f t f '1 > ¡'vI ¡ i , I I , . I I , , I I , , I I , . I 1__", IL RZ 00-006 Bruce Neal f " o o co " c o E E o J: u (I... I' . \ I ' , \ f " l' F. P. F. O. D. Canal No. 26 IL W/ d This, pattern indicates subject parcel . (, \ IL C) o IL /',----------~------------" ,," "'1 ) ! I , . I I . I , I , ¡ IX ¡ I I i ¡ i ì í ¡ í í i i \, l ''''___-_----_,,_______---------J''' Community Development t Geographic Information Systems Map prepared April 24, 2000 TNt....... '--' 0CIqIIId tar~...... MIl ....... p.IpOMI..... N 'tHe ..., efkwt_ bMn .... .., ~ hi JnOItIUNnl.Md ~ ~ ~ I.. natllMnded tar.... _ . a.g.t;' bhIng dc:Icu..& Bruce Neal Land Use œ~= BB ~ Amy Lone t I t I "I > TM I '0 o o rr '0 c: o E E o I (I... I' . \ I ' , \ ' ,1 lO í\/ ¡ i o I I . , I I , o I I , , I I 0 o I t__", RZ 00-006 ., V/7d This, pattern indicales subject parcel ( ( ~ o ü ~" --------~------------" /' -- ì , . I , " i . . I I o 0 I . 0 I I \ , í ¡ o . I I i i \ ì i i / í í ; \ ¡ , ' ~_____-----,;------_---------J Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map prepared April 24. 2000 f 1hII1nIIP ... bMn ~ ........... 1M ....... ~ ....,. 'MIle ..., tlcll'tt. bMn fMdI to ,...... .. __ CUJIR'" ~ InbmIIIan pœIIbIiI,.1I not IrMndId far ~ _ . ..... tftIng ~ N r'~'~'w] ! ::::.: "0 II ~i S' ~II :tJ: i ~ ~ II Eij. ::I iI ..... .....I! Õ' ~II "1 (j II ~ 0 II N 8 il 6811 <? = . 0::1 ! o ~, Q\ ~ ' Õ'~ "1 tþ: t::C t€ : "1 -: = 0, n"O tþ 8 I z tþ I tþ::l æ..7 '-' .~.,. T.::::;\"." ' ~,,- ~¡~I'~¡J:I~I¡~ w'w 'w,w Þ--to¡O'~· ; .......¡I-' .......¡N,..."""¡N WiNI ,""'I-Þ-:..... ¡..-¡N¡O¡o¡O¡W 81818181818 8iv:i8i521818 81818181818 81521881~i~ b- úlil N .dl 011 J' H 011 i 2- 0.11 ~? e2~ 0(J ~.~ ~~ a..Q.. t §~ , ; . , Ö.' >i1 : b'n In I.' 0 '"' 1"0 I-'~ :e¡ ,e¡ ~ :~iS E.I::;-i~ 0: '-:o!< ,!jo '::S ,_. Ig i~' 1« I~!~ in i:>;"' Ir I~, i::S ¡51 I~;J>Z¡: - S i~ il Ëï ~ :8 I, !1Q ..,.., " Õ n : tþ 1 ::s § :....11 ~' Ii ~ ::s P- ¡;;. >-ìl '"', ~, P-: 01 o þ' n o d "I1 ~ ~. ;J> '" '" ::s þ' n tI1tc e-g g, ¡ ; I I ~ S=I _.0 .~' _ ::; ... i iltJ~oI s= I .... I Roi ~I tJ I 1 g.1 1 ~I I tþ ,¡::.. s~ -cS ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~a~~~~~~~e¡::!~~a~~~ ::P. tc ::P. ::p. ::p. g ::p. ::p. ::p. e. ~,. ::p. ::p. '" ::p. ::p. ::p. ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::s ~ ~1'~ o '" 0 0 0 ~ 0 n 0 0 0 0 000 o g. 0 0 0 § 0 0 0 0 0 tc 0 0 10 o 0 :i1 ~ I =r f!f!f!f!f!f1f!f!f!f!Pf!f!f!f! WWWWWWWWWW -Þ-N-Þ--Þ--Þ-W-Þ--Þ-.þ..W \O\O\O\O\Ow\O\O\O..... .þ..o\";¡OOUlOOO.þ...þ..";¡ O\W \0 N.þ.. VI..... 0\ \0 0\ I , I . I I I , , I \0 NVI.........O\\O§VI ..... ~~~~52Ñ ~ OONN...;¡......þ.. VI ( I¡ " ~ ~I (JQ: "1 ~ "0 ::r .... n - ~ "11 8' ~ .... .... o ::I ín tþ "1 -< .... n tþ ¡;n ,¡::.. ~ ~ o o ::iT. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIO,N ERS\ PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA ,,;j;,' July 18, 2000 ë? TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: U ,,' '-' ' i ( NOTICE is t¡ereby given in accordance with Section ' 11,00.03 of the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code I and in accordance with the provisions of the SI. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicant has requested that the SI. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: 1. Petition of Roger Medema for a 12'month extension of '\1 a Partial Final Planned Development Site Plan approval for the project known as Palm Breezes Club MHP - Planned J Unit Development, and a Change in Zoning from the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Palm Breezes) Zoning District for the following described property: 1 A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP _ 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORI- DA, AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE.', SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER :(1 OF SAID SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST; THENCE, NORTH 890059'46' EAST ALONG THE C SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION; 10, A DISTANCE OF 793.96 FEET; THENCE NORTH ;,' 000000'14" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 85.00 FEET TO THE I"~ POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE, NORTH 000006'22":~; EAST, A DISTANCE OF 465~00 FEET: THENCE. SOUTH 890059'46' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 793.80 ÆET TO THE;' WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SAID! SECTION 10; THENCE. NORTH 000006'22"; EAST ALONG I;' THE. WEST LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SEC· .-.... .. TION 10. A DISTANCE OF 789.15 FEET TO THE SOUTH. ' LINE OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER 'OF THE NORTfH, WEST QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 10; THENCE NORfiI , 890052'47" WEST, ALONG THE SOUTH LINE OF THE .~. NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER; ""1 A DISTANCE OF 509.36 FEET;· THENCE. NORTH" 000007'13" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 75.86'FEET; THENCE" NORTH 210012'38" WEST. A, DISTANCEOF 90.00 FEET THENCE, NORTH 700007'13' WEST, A DISTANCE '() 55.54 FEET; THENCE, NORTH 24-12'25" WEST, A DJ TANCE.OF 115.23 ,FEET TO A POINT.OE NON-TANGE . INTERSECTION:. WITH A CURVE CONCAVE TO ~tHe NORTHWEST A RADIAl: TO SAID POINT BEARS..NOR 24-12'25",:WEST, HAVING A RADIUS~0F.390.00 FEET;· THENCE, WESTERLY ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL'ANGLE OF 030041 '47", ANÂRC DISTANCE OF,. 25.16. ÆET; THENCE,NORTH 350008'23"WEST,'1";DIS~ ., TANCE OH24.86 ÆET; THENCE¡:iNORTH 51~~O'41~· WEST, A ''DISTANCE OF 36.82 FEEt¡~;THE~~~~'NORTH 300044'10rWEST. A DISTANCE OF';95.00 . ;ro A;, NON-TANGENT INTERSECTION WITH,A'CURVE:CONCAVE : TO THE NØRTHWEST/A RADIALJO:SÁID POltf.LBEARS NORTH3~4'10'WEST, ANDHAVINGA.RAÐIUS O. 37.50 FEEr¡.THENCE.·.·EASTERLY,;~l"ONGSAID CURVE THROUGH.ACENTRAL ANGEL;DF.,~g';;;14'5!f', AN.AR . DISTANC!; ,OF: 9;33: ÆET. TO AP.OINTOFINTERSECTIO WITH··MCOMPOUND ,CURVEf.IjijAVINS,~;A·RADIUS .... 387.50 ,FEET; ~"THENCE,.NORTliEßI+y;~ntßOUGH;¡"..C TRAL"ÅN'GEl.'\'·O.· .F'9Q0646. '03\SÄ. N'lMC"JD.JSINtC£:ìí.. .' . . " 654.45 FEET¡TI;fENOEi;NORTH 3s.:.14'4TEÄST;T;6:'DI TANCE ()F12~;~O"'f.EET.¡, ;,JH~NCE.·,NORTW0l)ii01 · . EAST, A DI$T~CEOF,,1;3(¡;7,1:FEET¡ :;.J;HEN~:S 890044'42\ ~ST,'ADISì"ANCEiQF;'764:e8:ÆET',T WEST Ufl!E)OF-~THE,NORTHEAST~QUARTER;". souTH '~'22"WEST;j;ALONG(THE ·WESr' THE NORTHEAST QUÂRTER.,Ai',OISTANCE , FEET; THENCE. SOUTH 890044'42' EAST. A DI 62.41 FEET TO A 'POINT OF CURVATURE 0 CONCAVE- TO THE'SOUTHWEST; HAVING A' .' ,f, , 70.00 FEET; THENCE, SOUTHEASTERLY TIt Q GH~ ~ CENTRAL ANGL. EOF61-16~1.9·¡;,AN ":RC.D.I " CE 0F¡i' 74.86 FEET; THENCE. SOUTH ,280028 24·, ,. A DlS, TANCE 'OF 67;84'iFEET;THENCE. SOUTlN8~9~0 · EAST;'A DISTANCE: OF , 89.92;FEET TO A'P.OINT'OFCUR VATURE Of"ArrçI)IWE.ÇO.~Q~YE TO THE'iSOf!11'l ~YJNG. A ,ßÄ.. rJ.'U. S ,0F,.25. ,0. ..0. ,¡FE. ET¡ ..~.T.HENe.~, SO. ... . .,. ~TERb~trHR. ~UG. WA'fQE~TAL A.N.G;L£(O~6,1~O': EAST. ~A. RCD. IST.ANC ...F,~26.84 Eª':;<>,JH.. SOUTHI~28'24' . > ISTANC .64 , ! 'THENC.·, bR. TH 61 6~EAS STAN 141 00" ET''THENG' TH 2 ", TAÑCf'ÖFi30:00!FE .-j:THENC EA§!t"(~t(~DISTANC·. ;1,8:58 F'¡:. ENC. ~.,,; 32o:..,O'01·EAST:f!\ , CE Of~ ,;iJ. E ,NOSTH :~10031}3 . r;"A 0I5T,.' ,F"$~Ø$ .' TH~NCE. SOUl}l 00 O'Q1~,j ·~~·M DlSTMC :515;40 ':f;f. ET.::,.itT!;IEtjCe}f~p~THlO .9~-32·WE~ '. JANCEtQF983.03)iFEET.,;~¡.rHeN . UTH, .,WEST,ÇÆ, PISTANCSOR.':326.îT8~'EEEr. ,;'~'THENC ~¡, 00ò006~22'{Í~WEST;";Å·{{)ISTANCe$iOF~A65.1)(); .' ·THENCE~:iNORTH·:~89~9:46·';<'WE$Tt;.;A~DlSI. C . '121.00'FEET; RETURNING TO",1HE,¡;',OINT,Of.'BEGINNI.. -."",I CONTAINING 68.29 ACRES MORE OR LESS (Location: North side of Orange Avenue, approximately .1,8.2.0 feet east of the Florida Turnpike) 2. Bruce Neal, for a change in Zoning from IX (Industrial Extraction) Zoning District to IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning ! District for the following described property: 31 34 40 NW 1/4 of NE 1/4 less Rd & Canal- (37.87 AC) ¡' (or 315-1202:376-759) . (Tax Id. No. 1431-120-0000-000/6) (Location: South side of SI. Lucie Boulevard,approxi~,' mately 0.5 mile west of Sapp Road.) '. ",;' , 3. James and Shirley Cagle, for a change in Zoning from i RS-3 (Residential, Single-Family3dulacre) '. toPNRD ,~ (Planned No!,"Residential Development)_Zon.ingDistrlct ~ for the folloWíngdescribedproperty:',",;" .', . . .' . . .. ". "I The t,lorth161,.00feet of the 'South ,312.50 feet onqe' Nor1hl!ast(N.E.) 1/4 of the Northeast (N.E.) 1/4 of Section 9. Towm~hlp 36 South. Range 40 East; Less and Except, therefore the West 279.00 feet, and Less road right-of' way for. Oleander Aven.ue (S.R. 6~~). All beingándJyingJ.' . St. Luçle County,Flonda. Containing 1.27 acres more 0 less. '. . , .. ... . . ,,,.1 ~ ..' ,_ ..f I The East 119.00 feet of the West 279.00 fe'etbf the NortI'Ì 156.2~ feet of the South 312.51 feet of th~,Nòrthe WE.) 1/4 of the Northeast (N.E.) 1/4 of Sectlòìf.9~ Tow" ship .3.6 South. Range. 40 East. All being. and!J>.'ing i. n ,5. Lucie; County, Ronda. ContainIng· 0.43 acr'és; ":mòfê "1) ~~IJ..3409~111-rio2o-0OÓ/1 ) . ,';1'~;'(~'''~;i~ ¡ -. ..:+. - - '.- . ._: t¡Jtd:::': . ~- :. .i:-;:~/tî' ~ ~;¡;;~~~;;;;~~~t~:' ··~·I tion ~I!.ex.... Building, ·2300 Virginia,::.AV4Ìî({é;; Jt:P Rorlda!;.onJJuly18,2000,beginning~tì6:,. ;.3;'· soon thereafter as possible. .' ';'.'. '.~. , ; ·r,' :~/~- '. _ ". ,J(: _ ."' i '.' ·..·:it~\:i_},: :,-'-r.'~-', :..;;;-~ ~f.-· PURSO~ TO Sêctlon286.0105:Roñdá~~es.· person,:~!çides to ¡¡ppeal any'decislon~rQádëô, j '~"Þoa a.gen.cy,.;pr¡co.. mmlssion. W. ith r.esp.ect t.o:any· . . ered.· eating or hearino'~liêwilr'ñeëda' pro.and that, for ,such'purþðsë:h . ens'v~rbatim recoi'dibMhe'Þroœediìt ~nciúdés· the 'testimony}ahiFèvf ';n '1lstabe basedJ;;;;';;~;:;'¡~"'" . I,~;r)', ... 1. "iJ~¡~'rlÏJt~ 10 \BÔARDc()F COUNT¥:'COMMISsíON ;',.:",\" IST:'LUCIE COUN1ìY"fl,iORIDA 'C'~, ..,i,rlSl,J?H,N·P.BIWHN,; C~,Ala. ........ h~~~~5~~A ~~Jlii~~~j20o.dt'~':C::'\..7:~i~1;þ;'. ¡.f'G 17 \'bun( ~. .............. TO: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: '-" ....,¡ ITEM NO. ~ DATE: 7/18/00 AGENDA REQUEST CONSENT REGULAR X PUBLIC HEARING BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS NTE:. :PkcM ITY DEV. DIRECTOR Community Development/Tourism Division Tourist Development Council - Agreement with R. J. Gibson, Inc. for Advertising Services Renewal On March 9, 1999, the Board approved the Assignment of the March 3, 1998 Agreement for Advertising Services from Mass Beach, Inc., d/b/a MBI Marketing/Advertising to R. J. Gibson, Inc. The agreement was for two (2) years with an option to extend for an additional one (1) year. The extension has been approved by the Tourist Development Council to go before the Board of County Commissioners. If approved by the Board and based upon the established budget for advertising and special projects, the extension agreement provides for compensation to R. J. Gibson, Inc. not to exceed two hundred fifty thousand dollars and 00/100 ($250,000). 611-5210-534000-500 Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the extension for one (1) year on the agreement with R. J. Gibson, Inc., and authorize the chairman to sign the agreement upon receipt of the signed original from Gibson. [APPROVED DENIED [X] OTHER: Recommendation Changed: Approval of request to go out for RFP' s for ty: Administrator new Adv. Agency and approval of up to 90 day extension to e~g agreem~brdßa£l@¥~i~dfê~sting projects. County Attorney: ~ Management & Budget: .rf)Y\')~ Purchasing: Originating Dept.: Other: Other: PORMS\AGNRBQ Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) '. ~. -- FORT PIERCE ...., 51: LUCIE: COUN1Y ST DEVElPPMENT CO~ PORT ST. LUCIE HUTCHINSON ISLAND FLORIDA Interoffice Memorandum St. Lucie County, Florida To: Board of County Commissioners From: Gayla Barwick, Community Development/Tourism Dàte: 7/7/00 Subject: Tourist Development Council- Agreement with R. J. Gibson, Inc. for Advertising Services and Renewal Option BACKGROUND: On March 9,1999, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Assignment of the March 3,1998 Agreement for Advertising Services from Mass Beach, Inc., d/b/a MBI Marketing! Advertising to R. J. Gibson, Inc. The initial two (2) year term of this agreement ran through February 28,2000 with an option to extend the agreement for an additional year that would run to March 1, 2001. A copy of the agreement with R. J. Gibson is attached to this memorandum. The amount of the compensation to be paid to R. J. Gibson for advertising for the extended year will not exceed two hundred fifty thousand dollars and 00/100 ($250,000) based upon the budget for campaigns and projects set forth in the agreement. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed option to extend the R. J. Gibson contract for one (1) year, and authorize the chairman to sign the agreement upon receipt of the signed originals from R. J. Gibson. Respectfully submitted, ~c~~'- GB:mc S6:U un~. S6:U fM1AIJtnLed.. 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce. FL 34982 . (561) 462-1535 . FAX: (561) 462-2132 . 1-800-344-TGIF '-' ...." FIRST AMENDMENT TO MARCH 3, 1998 AGREEMENT THIS FIRST ~\ŒND~Œi'il, made and entered into this day of ,2000, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida. hereinafter referred to as the "County", and R. J. GIBSON, INC., as assignee of Mass Beach, Inc., d/b/a! MBI Marketing/Advertising., or his, its or their successors, executors, administrators, and assigns hereinafter called the "Consultant". WITNESSETH: \VHEREAS, on March 3 1998, the County entered into an agreement for advertising services with Mass Beach, Inc., d/b/a MBI Marketing! Advertising ("MB I"), hereinafter referred to as the "Agreement", for the period March 1, 1998 through and including February 28, 2000; and, WHEREAS, on March 9, 1999, the County consented to the assignment of the Agreement by MBI to the Consultant; and, WHEREAS, the parties desire to amend the Agreement to extend the term for an additional year through and including February 28, 200 I, and to clarify the amount of annual compensation to be paid to the Consultant. NOW, THEREFORE, in considerationofthe mutual promises contained herein, the parties agree to amend the Contract as follows: 1. Paragraph 4. TER.i.~1 is hereby amended to read as follows: 4. TE~"I The term of this Agreement shall begin on March 1, 1998, and shall continue through and including February 28, 2001. 2. Paragraph 6. COMPENSATION is hereby amended to read as follows: 6. COMPENSATION The Consultant shall be compensated for all services as outlined in Exhibit "A" and rendered under this Agreement in an annual amount not to exceed two hundred fifty thousand and 00/100 dollars ($250,000.00) as follows: A. Summer Campaign - Not to exceed eighty thousand and 00/100 dollars ($80,000.00). B. Fall Campaign - Not to exceed forty-five thousand and 00/100 dollars ($45,000.00). -1- ,-,. ...", C. Winter Campaign - Not to exceed thirty thousand and 00/100 dollars ($30,000.00). D. Additional Services (Excluding Winter, Summer and Fall Campaigns)- Not to exceed ninety-five thousand and 00/100 dollars ($95,000.00). The compensation paid to the Consultant for services rendered hereunder shall be as authorized and approved as provided above and shall be calculated using the rate schedule attached hereto and incorporated herein as Exhibit "B". The budget for each subsequent year of the Agreement will be decided by the parties prior to February 1 51. each year. The Consultant shall submit detailed invoices with supporting backup information, including media affidavits for each television and radio commercial placed and tear sheets for each print advertisement, to the County when requesting payment. Such invoices include detail sufficient for pre-audit and post audit review by the County. 3. All other terms and conditions of the Contract shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted, made and executed this First Amendment upon the terms and conditions above stated on the day and year first above written. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRlVl>\..~ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ~:" g:\agreema t\ II-rjcibsoa. wdp BY: (SEAL) A TrEST: -2- ~ '-ø-. AGENDA REQUEST ~TEM No.l þ ß DATE: 7/18/00 CONSENT REGULAR X PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [] Quasi-Jud. [ Communi tv Development PRESENTE~~~ TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 00-120 approving the request of Freedom Plastic, Inc., for a Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan approval for the project known as Freedom Plastics. (File No.: SPMJ-00-006) BACKGROUND: Freedom Plastics, Inc., has applied for a Major Adjustment to a Major Site plan approval for the project known as Freedom Plastics. This adjustment is to allow the construction of a 51,200 square foot building on a 16.23 acre parcel of land on the east and west side of Enterprise Road, approximately 363 feet south of the intersection of Glades Cut-Off Road and Enterprise Road. The subject property is located in the IL (Industrial Light) Zoning District. The applicant is proposing an intensity of 15% total lot coverage by buildings, which is below the 50% maximum permitted within the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution #00-120. COMMISSION ACTION: [ X] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: DENIED CON as M. Anderson ty Administrator County Attorney: þ Review and Aoorovals Management & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: originating Department: Finance: (Check for Copy only. if applicable) 'w .~ COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: July 18, 2000 Resolution 00-120 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Community Development Director Date: July 11 , 2000 Subject: Consider Draft Resolution 00-120 approving the request of Houston Cuozzo Group, Inc., for a Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan approval to allow a 51 ,200 square foot building for the project known as Freedom Plastics. (File No.: SPMJ-OO-006) LOCATION: 3206 Enterprise Road, Fort Pierce, Florida (approximately 350 feet north of the Intersection of DiGiorgio Road and Enterprise Road/ Oleander Industrial Park Area) EXISTING ZONING: IL (Industrial, Light) LAND USE DESIGNATION: IND (Industrial) PARCEL SIZE: Total Site Area: 16.23 Acres 7.0 acres east of Enterprise Road 9.23 acres west of Enterprise Road PROPOSED USE: A 51,200 square foot expansion of the existing Freedom Plastics PVC pipe manufacturing company. SURROUNDING LAND USE: Existing Industrial uses surround the property to all sides. These uses include roof truss manufacturing, PVC pipe manufacturing (other than Freedom Plastics), metal pipe manufacturing, distribution and other general light industrial uses. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Ft. Pierce Central Fire Station is located approximately 5 miles away to the north. UTILITY SERVICE: Water is provided by Fort Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) and Sewer services to be provided onsite through on-site septic systems. Connections to central utilities will be required when they are available to the site. '-' "'-' July 18,2000 Page 2 Subject: Freedom Plastics Major Adjustment to an approved Site Plan TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS: Right of Way Adequacy: Enterprise Road has a right-of-way width of 60 feet. Scheduled Area Improvements: None TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity ******************************************** STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Section 11 .02.07, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code identifies the minimum Standards of Reviewfor all proposed Site Plans. These standards must be met in order for any site plan approvals to be considered. Staff has reviewed the request for Major Site Plan approval, utilizing these requirements and notes the following: A. CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed building or use is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County; and the proposed use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the particular provisions of this Code authorizing such use and any other requirement of the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. The proposed 51,200 square foot building and storage area addition is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. Policy 1.1.1 .1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes a maximum intensity within the IND (Industrial) land use category as 40% - 50% lot coverage by structure. The proposed addition to the subject property will increase the total lot coverage of this site to approximately 105,000 square feet or 15% total lot coverage. Policy 1.1.5.9 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan states"... the use of individual on-site septic disposal systems for industrial development activities shall be in accordance ~- - ---------- --- - '-' ....., July 18. 2000 Page 3 Subject: Freedom Plastics Major Adjustment to an approved Site Plan with all applicable state and local regulations, including but not limited to Rule 100-6, F.A.C. and St. Lucie Environmental Control Ordinance 89-02 (wastewater and sewage disposal regulations). At this time, the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) does not have sanitary sewer services within the proposed area. The developer will be utilizing the existing onsite septic system for septic disposal. At the time that FPUA does install sanitary sewer lines within this area, the developer has stated that they will connect to this system upon availability. A recommended condition of approval for this project will be that when central sewer services are available to this site, connection to that system will be mandatory, consistent with the requirements of Section 11.02.08(A)(5) of the Land Development Code. Policy 1.1.8.10 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan states"... existing commercial and industrial designated lands within the urban service area, through requiring a strict demonstration of service availability, before authorizing Land Use and Zoning amendments in areas not presently indicated as having such a demonstration. The subject property proposed for development is located inside the urban service boundary within a core area of industrial development. B. EFFECT ON NEARBY PROPERTIES 1. The proposed building or use will not have an undue adverse effect upon nearby property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, and other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed addition to the existing Freedom Plastic manufacturing complex has been determined not to have an undue or adverse effect upon nearby properties and is consistent with the other surrounding existing industrial uses. The subject property is surrounded by IL (Industrial Light) zoning on all tour sides. Enterprise Road, a public right-ot-way, has a right-ot-way width of 60 feet. There are no plans to provide tor any improvements to Enterprise Road. At this time, there is sufficient capacity on the transportation facilities in the area to support the addition to the Freedom Plastics development. The Fort Pierce Utility Authority (FPUA) will be servicing the proposed project with water. The development will have an onsite sewer system. Upon the FPUA providing sewer service within the area proposed tor development, the developer has indicated that the property will hook into the municipal system. The applicant has provided verification from FPUA that sufficient capacity is available to support the proposed addition. 2. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed building or use on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping, and screening. The developer has provided a 15-foot landscape buffer along Enterprise Road and a 10-foot wide landscape buffer along all sides of the storage area proposed for the eastern parcel. The sites western storage yard has the required 15 foot buffer along Enterprise Road and the 10 foot buffer along the internal perimeter lot lines. These ~ ..""" July 18, 2000 Page 4 Subject: Freedom Plastics Major Adjustment to an approved Site Plan perimeter areas will be landscaped utilizing the existing native vegetation as much as possible and will be supplemented, as required. 3. The proposed building or use will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. The design of the proposed project has been determined not to interfere with the development or use of neighboring properties. The surrounding properties are designated with an IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District and the proposed addition and use of this property is consistent with that of the surrounding properties. The access to the parcel on the east side of Enterprise Road is through two existing driveway connections to Enterprise Road. This adjustment does not require any substantial alteration to those driveways. The existing parking areas now occupying the public right-of-way along Enterprise Road will be removed as part of the reconstruction of this site. The storage parcel to the west has one access point. In addition, the property located on the eastern side of Enterprise Road is designated with a single point of entry. The existing driveways for these two parcels do not align with each other as would be required in these were to be built new. However relocation of these driveways so that the do align is not practical at this time because of drainage restrictions on the west side of the roadway. Since the western parcel is to be sued for storage of materials only, staff and the developers have agreed that a specific condition of approval will be that in the event that any permanent structures are located on the western parcel, then the driveways will be aligned in accord with minimum County design standards. Until that time, the driveway may remain as they area. C. ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES The proposed building or use complies with the standards of Chapter V, Adequate Public Facilities. The proposed addition to the Freedom Plastics site plan is not is not expected to cause any of the existing transportation links in this area to fall below an acceptable minimum Level of Service. The proposed project will be serviced water by the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA). At this time, no municipal sewer services are provided in this area. The developer has indicated that upon sewer services being installed in this area, the proposed project will connect to the system. The subject property is serviced through an onsite septic system approved by the Health Department. D. ADEQUACY OF FIRE PROTECTION The applicant has obtained from the St. Lucie County - Fort Pierce Bureau of Fire '-' ....,¡ July 18. 2000 Page 5 Subject: Freedom Plastics Major Adjustment to an approved Site Plan Prevention written confirmation, or has otherwise demonstrated by substantial credible evidence, that water supply, evacuation facilities, and emergency access are satisfactory to provide adequate fire protection. The applicant has obtained from the St. Lucie County - Fire District written confirmation that the proposed site plan conceptually meets the minimum access and water supply requirements for fire protection services at this facility. E. ADEQUACY OF SCHOOL FACILITIES The proposed building or use will be served by adequate school facilities. As this project is an industrial operation I no school facilities will be impacted by the addition. F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT For developments required to provide an environmental impact report under Section 11.02.09(A)(5), the proposed development will not contravene any applicable provision of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, or of Chapter VIII, "Natural Environment Analysis", of the St. Lucie County Barrier Island Study Analysis of Growth Management Policy Plan, Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc. (August, 1982). The subject property proposed for expansion was previously cleared and is currently utilized as the storage area for the existing Freedom Plastics operation. The developer will be clearing the property to the west of Enterprise Road and utilizing the property as its storage compound. The landscape buffer surrounding the proposed compound shall be made up of existing native vegetation supplemented when necessary. The vegetation on this site has been impacted by exotic vegetation. The developer has indicated a willingness to work with Staff to preserve some of the onsite vegetation within the native buffers surrounding the site. COMMENTS Freedom Plastics, Inc., has applied for a Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan approval for the project known as Freedom Plastics. The proposed addition, a 51 ,200 square foot pre- engineered metal building, will increase the production capabilities of the PVC pipe manufacturing company by allowing them to add three to four new production lines. The subject property is located in the IL (Industrial Light) Zoning District. The proposed addition to the subject property will increase the total lot coverage of this site to approximately 105,000 square feet or 15% total lot coverage. The proposed project has been determined not to interfere with the development or use of neighboring properties. The surrounding properties are designated with an IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District and the proposed addition and use of this property is consistent with that of the surrounding properties. The access to the parcel on the east side of Enterprise Road is through two existing driveway connections to Enterprise Road. This adjustment does not require any substantial '-' ...." July 18, 2000 Page 6 Subject: Freedom Plastics Major Adjustment to an approved Site Plan alteration to those driveways. The existing parking areas now occupying the public right-of- way along Enterprise Road will be removed as part of the reconstruction of this site. The storage parcel to the west has one access point. In addition, the property located on the eastern side of Enterprise Road is designated with a single point of entry. The existing driveways for these two parcels do not align with each other as would be required in these were to be built new. However, relocation of these driveways so that the do align is not practical at this time because of drainage restrictions on the west side of the roadway. Since the western parcel is to be used for storage of materials only, staff and the developers have agreed that a specific condition of approval will be that in the event that any permanent structures are located on the western parcel, then the driveways will be aligned in accord with minimum County design standards. Until that time, the driveway may remain as they area. The Fort Pierce Utility Authority (FPUA) will be servicing the proposed project with water. The development will have an onsite sewer system. Upon the FPUA providing sewer service within the area proposed for development, the developer has indicated that the property will hook into the municipal system. The applicant has provided verification from FPUA that sufficient capacity is available to support the proposed addition. A recommended condition of approval for this project will be that when central sewer services are available to this site, connection to that system will be mandatory, consistent with the requirements of Section 11.02.08(A)(5) of the Land Development Code. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 00-120, which, if approved, would grant this request for a Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. The existing driveway connection on the north end of the east parcel shall be realigned with the existing driveway connection on the storage parcel west of Enterprise road at such time as the first permanent structure is proposed for construction on the west side of Enterprise Road. For the purpose of this condition, permanent structure shall not include a single modular office trailer, but would include any combination of multiple modular trailers installed individually or together. These shall driveways shall be realigned prior to the issuance of any certificate of occupancy or other final building occupancy authorization for any future structures west of enterprise road. 2. The applicant shall be required to provide a landscape buffer along all four sides of the storage compound, consistent with minimum county landscape codes. The existing native vegetation may be utilized for this landscape buffer, and supplemented with additional vegetative materials as needed to meet minimum code requirements. As part of the development of this site (both east and west sides) all existing exotic vegetation shall be removed. 3. Upon the availability of central sewer services, to be provided by the Ft. Pierce Utility Authority, St. Lucie County or any other lawfully recognized utility provider, connection to that system shall be required and use of the existing on-site septic tanks shall be discontinued. ~ "wi July 18, 2000 Page 7 Subject: Freedom Plastics Major Adjustment to an approved Site Plan 4. Prior to a any Certificate of Occupancy or other final building occupancy authorization being issued forthe proposed addition, all handicapped parking spaces must be constructed on the site. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 00-120. Please let us know if you have any questions. .~ SUBMITTED: ia Shewchuk, AICP ommunity Development Director JS/cs H:/wplprojectslFreedom Plastics/agenda items/stfrpt.doc cc: County Administrator Asst. County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director County Engineer Fire Marshall Peggy Clyatt, Freedom Plastics Don Cuozzo, Houston Cuozzo Group, Inc. File ~ '"""" 1 RESOLUTION 00-120 2 FILE NO.: SPMJ-OO-006 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 A RESOLUTION GRANTING APPROVAL FOR A MAJOR ADJUSTMENT TO AN EXISTING MAJOR SITE PLAN FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS FREEDOM PLASTICS WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Freedom Plastics, Inc.. presented a petition for a Plan to allow the construction of a 51 ,200 east and west side of Enterprise R d, DiGiorgio and Enterprise Ro e described in Section ent to an existing Major Site on 16.23 acres of land on the t south of the intersection of ning District for the property 2. The Development and found it to meet maps of the St. Luci A of this Resolution ewed the site plan for the proposed project ments and to be consistent with the future land use prehensive Plan, subject to the conditions set forth in Part 3. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 4. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. 5. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. 6. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 7. The proposed project will be served water services by public facilities and onsite sewer system. File No.: SPMJ-QO-006 July 18. 2000 Resolution 00-120 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 '-' ...",,; 8. The applicant has demonstrated that water supply, evacuation facilities, and emergency access are satisfactory to provide adequate fire protection. 9. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on July 18, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the major site plan adjustment for the project known as Freedom Plastics, is hereby approved as depicted on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Houston Cuozzo Group, Inc., dated 4/28/00 and revised on 7/6/00, and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Community Development Director on 7/12/00, for the property described in Section B, subject to the following conditions: 1 . The existing driveway connection on the north end of ast parcel shall be realigned with the existing driveway connectio rage parcel west of Enterprise road at such time as the first p cture is proposed for construction on the west side of rp r the purpose of this condition, permanent st re n ingle modular office trailer, but would in n of ¡pie modular trailers installed indi . II driveways shall be realigned prior to the i cupancy or other final building occupancy ture structures west of enterprise road. 2. The applica quired to provide a landscape buffer along all four sides of the ge compound, consistent with minimum county landscape codes. The existing native vegetation may be utilized for this landscape buffer, and supplemented with additional vegetative materials as needed to meet minimum code requirements. As part of the development of this site (both east and west sides) all existing exotic vegetation shall be removed. 3. Upon the availability of central sewer services, to be provided by the Ft. Pierce Utility Authority, St. Lucie County or any other lawfully recognized utility provider, connection to that system shall be required and use of the existing on-site septic tanks shall be discontinued. 4. Prior to any Certificate of Occupancy or other final building occupancy authorization being issued for the proposed addition, all handicapped parking spaces must be constructed on the site. B. The property on which this Major Adjustment to a Major Site Plan approval is being granted is described as follows: That part of the West V2 of the East V2 of Section 28, Township 35 South, Range 40 Resolution 00-120 Page 2 File No.: SPMJ-OQ-OOO July 18.2000 "-' ~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying South of the Florida East Coast Railroad, Lake Harbor Branch, and North of Canal Number 10, less the track conveyed to Ft. Pierce Growers Association as described in Warranty Deed dated January 24, 1972, and recorded in O. R. Book 199, Page 1420, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 623.00 FEET THEREOF: SUBJECT to a previously existing reservation or a perpetual easement created in O. R. Book 384, Page 1452 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, described therein as follows: "The Grantors hereby reserve for themselves and their assigns, a perpetual easement over and upon the Westerly 47 feet of the above described property for the purpose of preserving to the Grantors, their heirs and successors in interest, that Railroad Spur Track located thereon; including the right to use said railroad spur track to bring equipment, material or products from the FEC Railway line to the remaining properties owned by said Grantors, and to deliver products, material and equipment from the property of the Grantors to the FEC Railway line, to repair, maintain and use said railroad spur track In all manners customarily followed in using a railroad spur track, and to comply with all of the requirements and obligations between the Grantors and FEC Railway Company concerning said railroad spur track." "The easement reserved by Grantor Is for the use Grantees, their successors and assigns, a Agreement executed and recorded concu line in common with ut In a Maintenance PARCEL A A parcel of land in STRIAL SUBDIVISION, as recorded In Plat Book 9, Page 5, St. , Florida, described as follows: From the southeast corner of said Lot 3 est 357 feet; thence run north parallel with the east line of said Lot 34, 130 feet 0 the Point of Beginning; thence continue north, 110 feet; thence run west parallel with the south line of Lot 34,117 feet; thence run south 110 feet; thence run east 117 feet to the Point of Beginning. PARCEL B A parcel of land In Lots 34 and 35, INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION, as recorded In Plat Book 9, Page 5, St. Lucie County, Florida as follows: Beginning at a point on the east boundary of Lot 34 which Is 150.0 feet north of the Southeast corner of said Lot 34; thence westerly for 120.0 feet to a point which Is 150.0 feet north of the southern boundary line of Lot 34, said 150.0 feet being measured along a line parallel to the eastern boundary line of Lot 34; thence southerly for 20.0 feet along a line parallel to the eastern boundary line of Lot 34; thence westerly for 237.0 feet to a point which Is 130.0 feet northerly of the south boundary line of Lot 34 on a line parallel to east boundary line of said Lot 34; thence northerly on a line parallel to the east boundary of Lots 34 and 35 for a distance of 110.0 feet to a point; thence westerly on a line parallel to the south boundary line of Lot 34 for a distance of 117.0 feet to a point; thence southerly along a line parallel with the east boundary line of Lots 34 and 35 for a distance of 110.0 feet to a point; thence westerly File No.: SPMJ..()(}-()()6 July 18. 2000 Resolution 00-120 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 C. 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 D. 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 E. 42 43 44 45 46 47 F. 48 49 '-" ""'" for 117.0 feet to a point on the west boundary line of Lot 34 which is 130.0 feet from the southwest corner of Lot 34; thence northerly along the west boundary of Lots 34 and 35 a distance of 286.0 feet to the northwest corner of Lot 35; thence easterly along the northern boundary of Lot 35 a distance of 579.56 feet to the northeast corner of Lot 35; thence southerly along the eastern boundary of Lots 35 and 34 to the Point of Beginning comprising 3.5 acres, more or less. PARCEL C Lot 36 of INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION, as per plat thereof on file in Plat Book 9, Page 5, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. PARCEL D Lot 37, INDUSTRIAL SUBDIVISION, located in Section 28, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, and recorded in Plat Book 9, Page 5, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. (Tax ID #s: 2428-502-0041-00010,2428-502-0044-000/1, and 2428-131-0001-000/0). (Location: East and West side of Enterprise Road, a of the Intersection of DIGiorgio an tely 363 feet south oads) This Site Plan approval shall expire of Jul extension is granted in acco Development Code. T u (the primary manuf buildings consistent Development Code development beyon les uilding permit is issued or an . 2.0 )(3), St. Lucie County Land it for ncipal portion of this site plan pletion of that permitted building or cion 11.05.01 (a)(2), St. Lucie County Land right to continue with the construction of the d expiration date. The Major Adjustm nt to a Major Site Plan approval granted under this Resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Freedom Plastics, Inc., including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary development permits and construction authorizations form the appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities, including but not limited to: the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District, prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part B. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on July 18, 2000, which certificate shall remain valid for the period of Site Plan approval. Should the Site Plan approval granted by this resolution expire or an extension be sought pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Section A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. File No.: SPMJ-OO-OOO July 18. 2000 Resolution 00-120 Page 4 , . '-' ....., 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 n 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman John D. Bruhn XXX Vice-Chairman Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Paula Lewis XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 18TH Day of July 2000. BOARD OF COUNTY ST. LUCIE CO MISSIONERS RIDA ATTEST: PPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: DEPUTY CLERK COUNTY ATTORNEY cs: H:\WPlprojectslFreedom Plasticslagenda items\resolution.doc File No.: SPMJ-QO-OOO July 18. 2000 Resolution 00-120 Page 5 ~ "-Agenda Request Item Number l.Q -0 ....., Date: July 18, 2000 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. ¡ ] [ ] [ X ] [ ] Quasi-JD ¡X] To: Board of County Commissioners ~ Com. Development Director Submitted By: Community Development Director SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 00-119 approving the request of Dollom, Inc., for Major Site Plan approval for the project to be known as Savanna Club Apartments. (File No.: MJSP-00-006) Dollom, Inc., has applied for Major Site Plan approval for the project to be known as Savanna Club Apartments. This project is to be a 268-unit apartment complex, located on a 54.68 acre parcel of land on the north and south sides of Savanna Club Boulevard, approximately 800 feet east of South U. S. 1. BACKGROUND: The subject property is located in the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre) Zoning District. The applicant is proposing a density of 4.9 du/acre, which is consistent with the maximum permitted density within the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre) Zoning District. A summary of the proposed project is as follows: 1 Bedroom 100 268 Total Units 2 Bedroom 168 Number of units north and Nor1h Property 168 south of Savanna Club Blvd. South Property 100 Nor1h Property 5,000 sq. ft. Clubhouse. Tennis RlICfBlItlonal Component Cour1 and Swimming Pool South Property Tennis Cour1 and Swimming Pool 9.41 acres Preserved Wetlands 2.19 acres Mitigated Preservation Areas Upland Buffer Area 15.96 acres Preserved Landscape/Open Space 17.38 acres Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 00-119, which, if approved, would grant this request for Major Site Plan approval, subject to the eleven listed special conditions. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Draft resolution 00-019. COMMISSION ACTION: L!J APPROVED c::J DENIED c::J OTHER 4-1 (Bruhn) Contingent on special conditions in addition to 11 stated conditions~: 1) 8 ft wood fence - Ea -ènd & Coordination! SiQnatures north ~öó1iíy Ã1fu9ReVt . Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept.: Other: Other: . Finaoce:. 11 d 1· t d ft' 2) Conservatlon Eas~lll~l1L .J..lllposed on a property e lnea e or prEìÄ~ìff\fp\0n. . 3) Developer agreement to maintain landscaping or contribute cost for~'Tanãscaplng from USl to east property line of project. CURRENCE: ouglas M. Anderson County Administrator '-' ...., COMMISSION REVIEW: July 18, 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director DATE: July 10, 2000 SUBJECT Consider Draft Resolution 00-119 approving the request of Dollom, Inc., for Major Site Plan approval for the project to be known as Savanna Club Apartments. (File No.: MJSP-OO- 006) LOCATION: North and South side of Savanna Club Boulevard, east of South U.S. #1. This project is not part of the Savanna Club Development of Regional Impact. EXISTING ZONING: RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 DUlac) LAND USE DESIGNATION: RU (Residential, Urban) PARCEL SIZE: Total Site Area: 54.68 Acres 29.86 acres north of Savanna Club Boulevard 24.82 acres south of Savanna Club Boulevard PROPOSED USE: 268 Unit Rental Apartment Project PROJECT DENSITY: 4.90 units per acre SURROUNDING LAND USE: The Savanna Club Planned Unit Development DRI is located to the east; the Villages of Lake Lucie Subdivision is located to the north; there are existing developed industrial properties to the south (in the City of Port S1. Lucie), and there are vacant commercial lands to the west/southwest of this site. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Walton Road, Station Number #11, is located approximately 3 miles away. UTILITY SERVICE: Water and Sewer services to be provided by the City of Port St. Lucie. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS: Right of Way Adequacy: See Standards of Review/Comments. '-' ...., July 10, 2000 Page 2 Subject: Savanna Club Apartments Major Site Plan Approval Scheduled Area Improvements: See Standards of Review/Comments. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity ******************************************** STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Section 11.02.07, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code identifies the minimum Standards of Review for all proposed Site Plans. These standards must be met in order for any site plan approvals to be considered. Staff has reviewed the request for Major Site Plan approval, utilizing these requirements and notes the following: A. CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed building or use is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the Sf. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of Sf. Lucie County; and the proposed use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the particular provisions of this Code authorizing such use and any other requirement of the Code and Compiled Laws of Sf. Lucie County. The proposed Savanna Club Apartment complex is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the S1. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of S1. Lucie County. Policy 1.1.1.1 of theS1. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes the maximum density for the RU (Residential Urban) land use category as 5 dwelling units per acre. This proposed project is to be developed at a density of 4.9 dwelling units per acre. Therefore, the proposed project is consistent with this policy. Policy 1.1.5.10 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan states ".. . construction of new residential development at densities greater than two units per acre shall only be permitted when central or on-site wastewater systems are available or will be provided concurrent with the impacts of development, consistent with the adopted levels of service found in the plan." The applicant has provided a letter of service availability from the City of Port St. Lucie Utilities System Department, which indicates sufficient capacity availability to support the proposed project. The proposed project is consistent with this policy. Policy 1.1.9.4 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan states "...the land development regulations shall provide that existing on-site native upland habitat be incorporated into required site plans as part of open space areas, required landscaping or as a part of minimum yard areas so that as much of the identified habitat as is practicable is maintained." '-' ...." July 1 0,2000 Page 3 Subject: Savanna Club Apartments Major Site Plan Approval The proposed site plan for this project indicates the preservation of approximately forty-six percent (46%) of the existing site vegetation as part of the project's wetland (17.2%) and upland preservation (29.19%) areas. These areas include preservation tracts of the following vegetative communities: Pine/Flatwood, Mixed Gallberry PrairielWiregrass- Broomsedge Uplands, and Depressional Wetlands. Based upon the preservation of on site vegetation, the proposed project is consistent with this policy. The developer has dedicated an additional 17 .38 acres to be provided onsite for landscaping vegetation and open space areas. B. EFFECT ON NEARBY PROPERTIES 1 . The proposed building or use will not have an undue adverse effect upon nearby property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, and other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed Savanna Club Apartment complex has been determined not to have an undue or adverse effect upon nearby properties. The subject property is surrounded by the following land use and zoning districts. Property Use I,,¡ând· Use/ZoningDêšigru:mç¡íi i North Villages of Lake Lucie RU (Residential Urban) I RM-5 (Residential, Multiple Residential Subdivision Family - 5 dulacre) South Port St. Lucie Industrial Park LI (Ught, Industrial) I WI (Warehouse Industrial) This property is in the City of Port 51. Lucie RU (Residential Urban) I RM-5 (Residential, Multiple Savanna Club Adult Mobile Family - 5 du/acre) East Homes RU (Residential Urban) / PUD (Planned Unit Development) West Vacant Commercial Land and COM (Commercial) / CG (Commercial General) U. S. Highway One The proposed apartment complex is considered to be an appropriate transitional use from the more intense industrial park to the south, the commercial lands to the west, the single-family residential properties to the north and the manufactured home community to the east. Savanna Club Boulevard, a public right-of-way, has a right-of-way width of 130 feet. The current pavement surface is between 22-24 feet wide, for each direction of travel. This pavement width will accommodate two lanes of travel for each direction. In the mid-1980's the Board of County Commissioners agreed to the striping of this roadway as a 2-lane facility with a dedicated bike lane. When traffic conditions are deemed appropriate, this facility can be re-striped into a 4-lane facility. The Developers of the Savanna Club Apartments project, have submitted a traffic impact report assessing the impacts of this project. At this time, there is sufficient '-' ..."" July 1 O. 2000 Page 4 Subject: Savanna Club Apartments Major Site Plan Approval capacity on Savanna Club Boulevard to support both the development of the Savanna Club Apartments and the Savanna Club Development of Regional Impact. This development is not expected to cause any of the existing transportation links in the area to fall below an acceptable minimum Level of Service. The traffic impact report for this project was completed without any assumption of the segment of Lennard Road between Savanna Club Blvd. and Port St. Lucie High School being completed within the expected construction schedule of this development. When the segment of Lennard Road between Savanna Club Blvd. and Port St. Lucie High School is completed, this segment will serve to reduce the impacts of this project on the intersection of Savanna Club Blvd and South US #1 as well as redirecting through trips off of US #1. In 1986, the Board of County Commissioners through Resolution 86-97 agreed to accept the portion of Savanna Club Boulevard from South US #1 to Lennard Road as a public roadway. By subsequent interlocal agreement with the Savanna Club DRI authorities, it was agreed that the County would be responsible for maintaining the pavement and drainage associated with this roadway, and Savanna Club would be responsible for maintaining the liner landscaping along the corridor. It has been represented to the County by representatives from the Savanna Club Home Owner's Association, that this maintenance agreement may be requested for renegotiation following the commencement of construction of this project. The purpose of this renegotiation would be to remove the portions of Savanna Club Boulevard west of their utility site from their maintenance responsibility. The City of Port St. Lucie Utilities System Department will be servicing the proposed project with water and sewer. The applicant has provided verification from this entity that sufficient capacity is available to support the proposed apartment complex. 2. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed building or use on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping, and screening. The applicant has designed the project so that the parking areas for the individual units are incorporated into the interior of the building clusters (courtyard appearance). The inner courtyards of these clusters will be used as dry detention areas. The Developers have indicated a willingness to design these dry detention areas in a manner that attempts to protect as many of the existing trees in these areas as possible while still maintaining minimum storage requirements. Very little parking area will be visible from Savanna Club Boulevard. In addition, a native upland vegetation preserve area has been proposed to further buffer the existing area residences from the apartment clusters. The residential units to the north and east will buffered from the proposed apartment complex by the construction of an eight (8') foot high opaque wood fence along the north and east property line. The proposed apartment complex is designed to have five clusters with a maximum of four buildings each, containing between 12 - 16 units each. The closest any of these apartment buildings come to the eastern property line (north parcel) is approximately 125 feet. The closest any of these apartment buildings come to the '-' "WI July 10, 2000 Page 5 Subject: Savanna Club Apartments Major Site Plan Approval Savanna Club Boulevard right-of-way line is approximately 55 feet. The closest any of these apartment buildings come to the northern property line is approximately 55 feet. The properties surrounding the proposed site will be buffered through a native vegetation buffer and eight (8') foot high opaque wood fence along the property line. The applicant has sufficiently minimized any potential adverse visual impacts on the surrounding residential units through site design and preservation of the native uplands vegetation found on the existing site and the installation of an eight-foot (8') high opaque wood fence. 3. The proposed building or use will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. The design of the proposed project has been determined not to interfere with the development or use of neighboring properties. The property to the south is developed as an industrial park; to the east and north are existing residential developments of a similar land use intensity, to the west is vacant commercial land. This multi-family development project is being developed at an overall project density of (4.9 du/ac (gross)) similar to that of the single family Villages of Lake Lucie (3.1 du/ac (gross)) and the mobile home development of Savanna Club (3.3 du/ac (gross)). The access to the proposed building site will be through a single point of access onto Savanna Club Boulevard. No other access into or out of the development is being proposed. C. ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES The proposed building or use complies with the standards of Chapter V, Adequate Public Facilities. The Developers of the Savanna Club Apartments project, have submitted a traffic impact report assessing the impacts of this project. At this time there is sufficient capacity on Savanna Club Boulevard to support both the development of the Savanna Club Apartments and the Savanna Club Development of Regional Impact. This development is not expected to cause any of the existing transportation links in the area to fall below an acceptable minimum Level of Service. The traffic impact report for this project was completed without any assumption of the segment of Lennard Road between Savanna Club Blvd. and Port St. Lucie High School being completed within the expected construction schedule of this development. When the segment of Lennard Road between Savanna Club Blvd. and Port St. Lucie High School is completed, this segment will serve to reduce the impacts of this project on the intersection of Savanna Club Blvd and South US #1 as well as redirecting through trips off of US #1. The proposed Savanna Club Apartment Complex will be serviced with water and sewer by Port St. Lucie Utilities. The applicant has submitted a letter of intent from the City of Port St. Lucie Utilities System Department, which indicates that sufficient capacity for both water and '-' ......; July 10,2000 Page 6 Subject: Savanna Club Apartments Major Site Plan Approval sewer is available to support the proposed 268-unit apartment complex. The applicant has also submitted a letter from the County's Emergency Management Coordinator stating that the proposed 268-unit apartment complex will not negatively impact the emergency management operations in the case of a hurricane or other emergency evacuation need. The proposed apartment complex will be constructed in a manner which will eliminate the need for evacuation during minor events (category one, two or three storm events), as is required in the manufactured home park to the east. Under the current evacuation scenarios, the Savanna Club Manufactured Home Park is required to be evacuated when a Category 1 hurricane threatens. The Savanna Club Apartments would not likely be subject to an evacuation notice until at least a Category 4 storm were to threaten the community. D. ADEQUACY OF FIRE PROTECTION The applicant has obtained from the St. Lucie County Bureau of Fire Prevention written confirmation, or has otherwise demonstrated by substantial credible evidence, that water supply, evacuation facilities, and emergency access are satisfactory to provide adequate fire protection. The applicant has obtained written confirmation from the St. Lucie County Fire District that the proposed site plan conceptually meets the minimum access and water supply requirements for fire protection services at this facility. The applicant has incorporated a series of fire protection components into the design of the project. Each apartment cluster is proposed to have a fire hydrant at the entrance. Water is accessible and available to each building. E. ADEQUACY OF SCHOOL FACILITIES The proposed building or use will be served by adequate school facilities. The Savanna Club Apartments will be served by adequate school facilities. Student assignments will be made consistent with applicable St. Lucie County Board of Education standards and regulations. The Savanna Club Apartments will be subject to the County's Educational Impact Fee Ordinance. F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT For developments required to provide an environmental impact report under Section 11.02.09(A)(5), the proposed development will not contravene any applicable provision of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, or of Chapter VIII, "Natural Environment Analysis': of the St. Lucie County Barrier Island Study Analysis of Growth Management Policy Plan, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (August, 1982). The proposed Savanna Club Apartments site occupies approximately 54.7 acres and contains a large area of environmentally significant/sensitive land. The developers of this project have submitted the required environmental impact study for this site. The plant communities found on this site includes: Pine/Flatwood Community, Mixed Gallberry '-' ...., July 10, 2000 Page 7 Subject: Savanna Club Apartments Major Site Plan Approval Prairie/Wiregrass-Broomsedge Uplands Community, and Depressional Wetlands Community. The property located south of Savanna Club Boulevard is dominated by slash pine with a variable canopy cover ranging up to eighty (80%) percent. The understory is dominated by saw palmetto (Serenoa repens), shiny Lyonia (Lyonia lucida), rusty Lyonia (Lyonia ferruginea), gallberry (!lex glavara) and St. Johns Work (Hypericum spp.). The property located north of Savanna Club Boulevard is characterized by an intermixing of areas that are dominated by broomsedge and wiregrass (Aristida stricta). Canopy and shrubby plants scattered throughout the area include punk tree (Melaleuca quinqenervia), slash pine, dahoon holly (IIex cassine), wax myrtle (Myrica certifera), Brazialian pepper (Schinus terebinthifolius), red bay (persea borbonia), myrsine (Myrsine floridana) and saw palmetto. The common herbaceous species located within this community include Hypericum, Yellow Batchelor's Button (Polygala rugelii), hat pins (Eriocaulon compressum), and redroot (Lachnanthes caroliniana). In addition, small patches of swamp fern (Blechnum serrulatum) are located in shadier areas. Dense vines, including muscadine grape, catbrier (Smilax bona-nox) and love vine (Cassytha filiform is) is found on the site. Depressional wetlands were also identified on the proposed site. The dominating canopy within the wetland area is Carolina willow (Salix caroliniana) and red maples (Acer ruburm). These wetlands are also dominated by grasses, sedges and aquatic herbaceous species, including panic grass (Panicum spp. And Dicanthelium spp.), St. John's Wort (Hypericum spp.), Mecaronia acuminata, fragrant water lily (Numphaea odorata), beakrushes (Rhynchospora spp.), umbrella grasses (Fuirena spp.), yellow eyed grass (Xyris spp.), piperwort (Eriocaulon decangulare) and broomgrass. Wetland Habitat The site proposed for development contains 11.6 acres of wetlands (8.17 acres - Florida Jurisdictional Wetlands and 3.43 acres - Federal Only Jurisdictional Wetlands). Of the 11.6 acres, the Developers are proposing to preserve/conserve 9.41 acres (6.69 acres - Florida Jurisdictional Wetlands and 2.72 acres - Federal Only Jurisdictional Wetlands). This equates to 81 % of the wetlands located on site being proposed for preservation/ conservation. 2.19 acres of wetlands (1.48 acres of Florida Jurisdictional Wetlands and 0.71 acres of Federal Only Jurisdictional Wetlands) will be impacted by the proposed development. The developer has indicated that these impacts will be mitigated through purchasing credits in the Platt's Creek Mitigation Bank. The applicant will be entering into a contract with the County to purchase 3.25 acres of credit from the County's Platt's Creek Wetlands Mitigation Bank. The cost of this mitigation will be approximately $123,500.00 ($38,000 per credit acre purchased). Due to the quality of the preserved wetlands no on-site restoration effort is required for this project. The Army Corp of Engineers (ACOE) and U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the Department of Environmental Protection Agency (DEP) have requested that the Developer modify the existing ditch system within the north central wetland to incorporate minor ditch checks which will distribute the flow of water throughout the wetland and thereby improving the quality of the wetland. '-' "wtI July 1 0, 2000 Page 8 Subject: Savanna Club Apartments Major Site Plan Approval The primary wetland areas being impacted by this development are a small remnant located south of Savanna Club Boulevard and the southern portion of the central wetland located north of Savanna Club Boulevard. The clubhouse and entrance feature to the north of Savanna Club Boulevard will impact the north central wetland along its southern boundaries. During the site plan review process, Staff requested that the developer redesign this area to diminish the impact to this wetland by relocating the circular driveway and clubhouse further to the east. However, the developers have indicated that they could not meet with this request for the following reasons: 1. The overall site entrance geometry is controlled by the need to have the entrance on the north and south sides of the development at the same location on Savanna Club Boulevard. A shift in the entire intersection to the east to allow the clubhouse to maintain its supervisory position over the entrance would place the driveway too close to the units on the south side of Savanna Club Boulevard. 2. The clubhouse is situated in a critical position relative to the entrance. The clubhouse is placed in the most prominent position possible as an architectural statement for the community and will be used in observing and supervising the behavior of those entering the development. This is termed "defensible space" and is an important element in facilitating a sense of community. Placing the clubhouse off to one side in a less prominent position diminishes this important element of supervision. 3. Moving the clubhouse and driveway east will place the community swimming pool too close to the apartments. 4. Moving the apartments further east reduces the natural upland buffer between the apartments and the single-family residences to the east. 5. The reduction in wetland impacts gained by moving the clubhouse and driveway east to align with the west side of the circular driveway is only about 0.5 acres. Based upon the developers response and the limited on-site wetlands benefit against the substantial community benefits, staff determined that the developer has demonstrated in an appropriate manner that they have attempted to avoid and minimize the existing wetlands on this site as much as possible. Staff has received correspondence from the State and Federal review agencies, indicating that the developers proposed approach to the required wetlands mitigation, the purchase of 3.25 acres of mitigation credits, is acceptable. However, they have not issued any Final Order on this matter, and cannot do so until there is some final action by the appropriate local governing body in regards to the basics of the proposed Site Plan is taken. Upland Habitat The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that a minimum upland buffer be provided along the perimeter of any preserved or created wetland habitat. This buffer is to '-' ...., July 10, 2000 Page 9 Subject: Savanna Club Apartments Major Site Plan Approval be a minimum 10 feet in width, subject to more stringent standards as may be required by the state or federal permitting agencies. The applicants have indicated a minimum 15-foot upland buffer su rrounding the preserved wetlands. This buffer through the site design of the project often exceeds the proposed minimum buffer of 15 feet. On this site, the Developer proposes to preserve approximately 15.96 acres in upland preserve, this equates to 29.19% of the entire site in upland habitat. In order to insure the maintenance and longevity of these "Upland Preserve Buffers", the developer proposes the following procedures: a. The posting of signs, which prohibit the use of motorized vehicles from entering the preservation areas. In addition, non-residents will be prohibited from entering the preservation areas. b. A ten-year burn cycle for summer burns or a four-year burn cycle for winter burns, the use of onsite burning will ensure the safety of the surrounding residential homes from forest fires. C. Prior to a burn, the developer's representative in conjunction with the Division of Forestry and County Staff shall determine the necessity of a controlled burn. Upon determining the necessity for a controlled burn, the developer will work with the Fire District and Division of Forestry to develop a plan of action, in order to protect the apartment complex as well as surrounding residential properties to the north and east. As a means to provide the opportunity for the residents to enjoy the wetlands and native preservation areas, the developer has proposed an elevated wooden crosswalk that will meander over the preserve areas from Apartment Building Q to the Clubhouse and from the Clubhouse to the swimming pool. Additional upland vegetation shall be preserved within the courtyards during the development of the project through the sculpting of the drainage systems. When possible the applicant has indicated that additional vegetation will be preserved within these central areas. Gopher Tortoise The Developer's Environmental Impact Report (EIR) indicates that there are Gopher Tortoises located on the proposed project site. The Developer proposes to construct the development in "PODS". Prior to constructing a pod, the Developer shall implement the following "Gopher Tortoise Relocation Plan": a. Prior to proceeding with construction or vegetation removal, the area of proposed construction will be staked out for the delineation of the "Upland Buffer Preserve" Area. b. Upon completion of the staking of the uplands, the Developer's representative and '-' "wII July 1 0, 2000 Page 10 Subject: Savanna Club Apartments Major Site Plan Approval County Staff shall conduct a field visit to determine if any gopher tortoises are located within the proposed construction area. c. If active burrows are located, the Developer shall prepare and submit a gopher tortoise relocation permit application to the State of Florida. d. The Developer will indicate a location on-site for the relocation of the gopher tortoises. This onsite area shall be located within the "Preserved Upland Buffers". e. Upon receipt of the approval from the State of Florida for the gopher tortoise relocation, the tortoises within the applicable construction area will be relocated. COMMENTS Dollom, Inc., has applied for Major Site Plan approval forthe project to be known as Savanna Club Apartments. This project is to be a 268-unit apartment complex, located on a 54.68 acre parcel of land on the north and south sides of Savanna Club Boulevard, approximately 800 feet east of South U. S.1. The subject property is located in the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family-5 du/acre) Zoning District. The applicant is proposing a density of 4.9 du/acre, which is consistent with the maximum permitted density n the RM-5 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre) Zoning District. A summary of the proposed project is as follows: 1 Bedroom 100 268 Total Units 2 Bedroom 168 Number of units north and North Property 168 south of Savanna Club Blvd. South Property 100 North Property 5,000 sq. ft. Clubhouse, Tennis Recreational Component Court and Swimmina Pool South Property Tennis Court and Swimming Pool 9.41 acres Preserved Wetlands Preservation Areas 2.19 acres Mitigated Upland Buffer Area 15.96 acres Preserved Landscape/Open Space 17 .38 acres Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 00-119, which, if approved, would grant this request for Major Site Plan approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the first apartment/residential building or structure, the developer shall provide a right and left turn lane on Savanna Club Boulevard at the intersection of the project entrance to the Savanna Club Apartment project site. '-' ..." July 1 0,2000 Page 11 Subject: Savanna Club Apartments Major Site Plan Approval 2. The developer shall, as part of the construction of the turn lanes referenced in condition number one above, shall close the adjacent median cuts on Savanna Club Boulevard, located east and west of the project limits. The median closure shall be completed in a manner acceptable to the County. 3. The developer shall provide adequate intersection site lighting at the intersection of the Savanna Club Apartment Project Entrance roads and Savanna Club Boulevard. The lighting shall be installed utilizing acceptable Engineering Safety Standards. 4. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the first apartment/residential building or structure, the developer shall provide a concrete sidewalk, having a minimum width of five (5') feet, along the north side of Savanna Club Boulevard, from the eastern project limits to the intersection of the Villages of Lake Lucie Entrance. The sidewalk shall include the appropriate crosswalk markings to tie into the sidewalk to be built west of the Villages of Lake Lucie Entrance. 5. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the first apartment/residential building or structure, the developer shall provide a concrete sidewalk, having a minimum width of five (5') feet, along the south side of Savanna Club Boulevard, from the eastern project limits to the western project limits, as shown on the project site plan. 6. Prior to issuance of any land clearing permit, the developer shall delineate all areas to be preserved and shall institute applicable safeguards to ensure the health and viability of the protected trees. These safeguards shall be in accordance with the requirements set forth in the land clearing permit and shall at the minimum include the clear staking out of all areas of "Upland Buffer Preserve". These areas shall not be disturbed as part of the General land clearing activities. 7. As part of the clearing of the of the interior dry detention ponds, every effort shall be made to sculpt these retention areas to preserve as much of the existing habitat found in them as possible while still maintaining the minimum dry detention requirements for this project. These dry detention areas shall be filed marked and reviewed with the county resource protection coordinator prior to the commencement of any land clearing activity. 8. Prior to the removal of any vegetation from the construction area for the individual apartment/residential building or structure, the applicant's representative and county staff shall identify any gopher tortoises located in the proposed construction area and relocate to an appropriate upland buffer preserve. Prior to any land clearing, the developers shall: · Stake out for delineation, and protection, all areas of "Upland Buffer Preserve". These areas shall not be disturbed as part of the General land clearing activities. · Upon completion of the staking of the of "Upland Buffer Preserve", the Developer's representative and County Staff shall conduct a field visit to determine if any gopher tortoises are located within the proposed construction area. · If active burrows are located, the Developer shall prepare and submit a gopher tortoise relocation permit application to the State of Florida. '-' ...., July 10, 2000 Page 12 Subject: Savanna Club Apartments Major Site Plan Approval . The Developer will indicate a location on-site for the relocation of the gopher tortoises. This onsite area shall be located within the "Preserved Upland Buffers". . Upon receipt of the approval from the State of Florida for the gopher tortoise relocation, the tortoises within the applicable construction area will be relocated. 9. The proposed wetland mitigation/preservation area depicted on the project site plan is recognized as conceptual in nature and subject to final Federal and State agency approval. If any agency approvals are not obtained or if an alternative plan is found to be more appropriate, the project mitigation plan depicted in the site plan submittal shall be amended accordingly. 10. Prior to the issuance of the any building permits, including land-clearing permits, the developers of this project shall enter into a recordable agreement with St. Lucie County stipulating the location and method for providing the required off-site environmental mitigation from this project. All mitigation shall be at an approved site in St. Lucie County. 11. The applicant shall install additional fire hydrants when deemed necessary by the St. Lucie County Fire District. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 00-119. If you have any questions, please let us know. ~-~ SUBMITTED: la Shewchuk, AICP ommunity Development Director JS/cs H:lwp/projectslsavannacIMay2000/agenda itemslsavclbstf.rpt.62900.doc cc: County Administrator Asst. County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director County Engineer Fire Marshall Kevin Collins, Dollom, Inc. Robert Zuccaro, P .E., Craven Thompson & Associates William Stueber, Craven Thompson & Associates Sam Poole '-' "wtI 1 RESOLUTION 00-119 2 FILE NO.: MJSP-OO-006 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 A RESOLUTION GRANTING MAJOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS SAVANNA CLUB APARTMENTS WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Dollom. Inc.. presented a petition for Major Site Plan Approval to allow a 268-unit apartment complex on 54.68 acres of land on the north and south side Savanna Club Boulevard, approximately 800 feet east of U. S. Highway One, in t esidential, Multiple-Family - 5 du/acre) Zoning District for the property des 2. The Development Review Commi and found it to meet all techni maps of the St. Luci A of this Resolution Ian for the proposed project 3. The proposed proj standards of the Comprehensive Pia t with the general purpose, goals, objectives and e ounty Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 4. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. 5. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. 6. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 7. The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services. 8. The applicant has demonstrated that water supply, evacuation facilities, and emergency access are satisfactory to provide adequate fire protection. 9. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the File No.: MJSP-OO-006 July 18. 2000 Resolution 00-119 Page 1 '--' ....., 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 Community Development Director on July 18, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code, the site plan for the project to be known as Savanna Club Apartments, is hereby approved as depicted on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Craven Thompson & Associates, Inc., dated 5/18/00, last revised on 6/30/00, and date stamped received by the S1. Lucie County Community Development Director on 6/30/00, for the property described in Section B, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the first apartment/residential building or structure, the developer shall provide a right and left turn lane on Savanna Club Boulevard at the intersection of the project entrance to the Savanna Club Apartment project site. The developer shall, as part of the construction of condition number one above, shall close the a Boulevard, located east and west of the completed in a manner acceptabl th turn lanes referenced in ian cuts on Savanna Club The median closure shall be 2. 3. The developer shall p the Savann The lighting ection lighting at the intersection of e roa s and Savanna Club Boulevard. table Engineering Safety Standards. 4. Prior to the first Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the first apartment/r I ilding or structure, the developer shall provide a concrete sidewalk, ha a minimum width of five (5') feet, along the north side of Savanna Club Boulevard, from the eastern project limits to the intersection of the Villages of Lake Lucie Entrance. The sidewalk shall include the appropriate crosswalk markings to tie into the sidewalk to be built west of the Villages of Lake Lucie Entrance. 5. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for the first apartment/residential building or structure, the developer shall provide a concrete sidewalk, having a minimum width of five (5') feet, along the south side of Savanna Club Boulevard, from the eastern project limits to the western project limits, as shown on the project site plan. 6. Prior to issuance of any land clearing permit, the developer shall delineate all areas to be preserved and shall institute applicable safeguards to ensure the health and viability of the protected trees. These safeguards shall be in accordance with the requirements set forth in the land clearing permit and shall at the minimum include the clear staking out of all areas of "Upland Buffer Preserve". These areas shall not be disturbed as part of the General land clearing activities. File No.: MJSP.()()-Q06 July 18, 2000 Resolution 00-119 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 7. 8. .'w' ...., As part of the clearing of the of the interior dry detention ponds, every effort shall be made to sculpt these retention areas to preserve as much of the existing habitat found in them as possible while still maintaining the minimum dry detention requirements for this project. These dry detention areas shall be filed marked and reviewed with the county resource protection coordinator prior to the commencement of any land clearing activity. Prior to the removal of any vegetation from the construction area for the individual apartment/residential building or structure, the applicant's representative and county staff shall identify any gopher tortoises located in the proposed construction area and relocate to an appropriate upland buffer preserve. Prior to any land clearing, the developers shall: · Stake out for delineation, and protection, all areas of "Upland Buffer Preserve". These areas shall not be disturbed as part of the General land clearing activities. · Upon completion of the staking of th Developer's representative and determine if any goph rto construction area. nd Buffer Preserve", the shall conduct a field visit to ated within the proposed · eveloper shall prepare and submit a lication to the State of Florida. · II i ate a location on-site for the relocation of the gopher nsite area shall be located within the "Preserved Upland · Upon receipt of the approval from the State of Florida for the gopher tortoise relocation, the tortoises within the applicable construction area will be relocated. 9. The proposed wetland mitigation/preservation area depicted on the project site plan is recognized as conceptual in nature and subject to final Federal and State agency approval. If any agency approvals are not obtained or if an alternative plan is found to be more appropriate, the project mitigation plan depicted in the site plan submittal shall be amended accordingly. 10. Prior to the issuance of the any building permits, including land-clearing permits, the developers of this project shall enter into a recordable agreement with St. Lucie County stipulating the location and method for providing the required off-site environmental mitigation from this project. All mitigation shall be at an approved site in St. Lucie County. File No.: MJSP-Q(H)()6 July 18, 2000 Resolution 00-119 Page 3 1 2 3 4 B. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 '-" ..., 11. The applicant shall install additional fire hydrants when deemed necessary by the St. Lucie County Fire District. The property on which this Major Site Plan approval is being granted is described as follows: Parcel 1 That portion of Lots 14 and 15, Block 3, and Lots 9, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15, Block 4, Section 26, Township 36 South, Range 40 east, and Lot 9, Block 3, Section 25, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie Gardens, Plat Book 1, Page 35, Lying north of the northerly right-of-way line of Savanna Club Boulevard, as recorded in Plat No.1, Plat Book 24, Page 7, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Less and excepting the following: 1. That part of Lot 9, Block 3, Section 25, Township 36, South, Range 40 East, of the aforesaid Plat of St. Lucie Gardens, lying north of the northerly right-of- way of Savanna Club Boulevard, which lies within the boundaries of Plat of Savanna Club Plat No.1, Plat Book 24, Page 7, of the P blic Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 2. That property deeded to Jacob Aaron Cor, Page 305 and OR Book 817, Pag County, Florida. rded In OR Book 653, Records of St. Lucie 3. That prope recorded In County, Flor Parcel 2 Being a portion of L and 16, Block 3 and Lots 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 16, Block 4 of Section 26, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, as shown on the Plat of St. Lucie Gardens, according to the Plat thereof, as recorded In Plat Book 1, Page 35 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Described as follows: Commencing at the southeast corner of said Section 26; thence north 89°40'17" west, along a portion of the south line of said Section 26, a distance of 555.46 feet to the Point of Beginning; thence continue north 89°40'17" west, along a portion ofthe south line of said Section 26, a distance of 2167.87 feet to a point on the easterly right-of-way line of U. S. Highway One; thence north 2¡Ð29'17" west, along a portion of the said easterly right-of-way line of U.S. Highway One, a distance of 1237.64 feet to a point on the southerly right-of-way line of Savanna Club Boulevard as shown on Savanna Club Plat No.1, according to the plat thereof as recorded In Plat Book 24, Page 7 of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; thence easterly along a portion of said southerly right-of-way the following seven (7) courses: South 89°40'18" east, a distance of 287.17 feet to a point of curvature; thence by a circular curve to the right having a radius of 326.85 feet; a central angle of 35°03'50" and an arc distance of 200.03 feet to a point of reverse curvature; thence by a circular curve to the left having a radius of 590.00 feet, a central angle of 35°03'50" and an arc distance of 361.07 feet to a point of reverse curvature; thence by a circular curve to the right having a radius File No.: MJSP-OO-Q06 July 18. 2000 Resolution 00-119 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 '-' ...." of 485.00 feet, a central curve of 33°56'51" and an arc distance of 287.36 feet to a point of tangency; thence south 55°43'27" east, a distance of 150.00 feet to a point of curvature; thence by a circular curve to the left having a radius of 965.00 feet, a central angle of 33°56'48" and an arc distance of 571.74 feet to a point of tangency; thence south 89°40'15" east, a distance of 992.37 feet to a point; thence south 00°09'03" east, a distance of 597.33 feet to the Point of Beginning. Said lands situate, lying and being in St. Lucie County, Florida and Containing 41.673 Acres More or less. (Tax ID #s: 3414-501-1509-050/8, 3414-501-1914-050/0, 3414-501-1505-000n). North and South side of Savanna Club Boulevard, approximately 800 feet east of U. S. Highway One.) C. This Site Plan approval shall expire of July 18, 2002, unless a building permit is issued or an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(B)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The issuance of a building permit for a principal portion of this site plan (one or more of the apartment buildings) and the completion of that permitted building or buildings consistent with the requirements of Section 11.0 (2), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, shall maintain the right to the construction of the development beyond the indicated expiration d (Location: D. The Major Site Plan approval tio pecifically conditioned to the requirement that the p ding a· uccessors in interest, shall obtain all necessa construction authorizations form the appropriate State a es, including but not limited to: the United States Army Corps ida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida e ent District, prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authoriza commence development activities on the property described in Part B. E. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on July 18, 2000, which certificate shall remain valid for the period of Site Plan approval. Should the Site Plan approval granted by this resolution expire or an extension be sought pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. F. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Section A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman John D. Bruhn xxx Vice-Chairman Frannie Hutchinson xxx Resolution 00-119 Page 5 File No.: MJSP-OO-006 July 18. 2000 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 2j 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 '-' v Commissioner Paula Lewis xxx Commissioner Doug Coward xxx Commissioner Cliff Barnes xxx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 18TH Day of July, 2000. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: DEPUTY CLERK cs: H:\WP\Conditional uses\Munoz-Ouinlana\resolution.wpd File No.: MJSP-00-006 July 18. 2000 Resolution 00-119 Page 6 07/14/00 FZABVARR FUND 001 001001 001125 001126 001127 001132 001221 001241 001246 001247 001248 001252 001806 001807 101 101001 101003 101006 102 102001 105 107 109 136 140 140001 140306 160 183 183001 183004 185001 185204 186 186203 304 310002 315 316 316001 339 382 401 418 421 441 451 461 ~ LUciE futMIT - ßOAtID ...., YARRANT LIST 142- öâ-JtJ1r-:löoö TO 14-Jt1L-:lÔOÖ MJNb st1MMARy TITLE General Fuhd Recreation Speciàl EventS TC Community Action Agehcy FY 99/00 Section 112/MPO/FHVA planning 99/00 National Endowment HUDIaÌ1i tiéS Dept. of Interior Dune ~estoràtion 001-DEP-Childrens'S Envirò MusètiM Ft. Pierce Inlet Boat Launch ArM 99/00 Emergency Mgmt. Prep & Assist 99/00 Hazardous Material Grant TDC Planning Grant FY 99/00 Urban Mobile Irrigàtion Làb Grãnt Ecotourism/Heritage Tourisum County Floridian Aquifer VeIl Monitöring Transportation Trust Fund . Tráhsportàtion Trust Intêtlócals Transportàtion Trust/tocal optiöh Transportation Trtlst/lmpåct Pêê§ Unincorporated ServicèS Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Drug Abuse Fund Monte Carlo Lighting MSTUl4 Portd Port & Airport Fund Port Fund DOT-New N. Entrance Port Ft. pietce Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th judicial Cfr Ct Administrator-Arbitratiòn/Mêdiãt Ct Admin.- Teen Court SHIP Housing ASsistance FY 00/01 FIlFA SHIP 99/00 Recycling Operating Fund Recycling & Education 99/00 Communication Systell1 Fund Impact Fees-Parks County Building Fund County Capital Transportation Capital Timberlake Estates MSnU Capitãl Environmental Land Capital Fund Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.V. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities S. Hutchinson Utilities Pond Sports Complex Fund mP.Nš~s 315,gS6.i4 ~40. 00 63.81 438.09 12.93 18.60 1,437.50 14,910.00 6j8.os 3Š 1 . 6i 36.22 939.15 21.47 98.77 66,351.00 1,000.00 15.500.54 . 2,2öö.öö 52,òM.~5 521,2a 1M.Os 165,816.59 2,403.33 201.38 39, 35:LBo 2,200.00 6,925.50 1,1:134.26 3M.6B 291.89 290.14 21,811.44 7,811.22 674.21 aj.65 67,234.67 60,736.32 614.00 11 ,096,62 79.131.00 144,88 6,934.60 6,121.63 4;97a.33 1.53 25.54 24.03 22,038.30 PAG~ 1 PAftöLL Ö.ÖÖ 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ö,ÖÖ ö.ÖÖ Ö,OO O.Oò 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ö.öö O.OÖ 0.00 b.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 Ô.ÖÖ O¡ôÖ O.öö Ö¡ÖO 0.00 Ö.OO 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.ÖÖ ÖìöO 0.00 O.öö 01/14/00 FZABVARR ~ l.U(;Ì~ côOO1 - nöAtUJ ...." vÀRRAN'í' Ltst 142- 08-JtlL-iöoo tö 14-JtJt-2()()() MJND StJM1.tARï FùND mLÉ 491 Building Codè Fund 501 Information Tèchnology Fund 505 Health Insurance Fund 510 Service Garage Fund 611 Tourist DevèlopmèI1t Trtist-Ådv :rund 625 Law Library GRANt> TOTAL! wmsftš 1Ötlad.~4 24.211.11 50.350.10 28.406.74 1131.63 6.465.00 1.102,160.03 PAt;~ 2 ~AftðLL Ò.ÖÖ 0.00 5.434.26 0.00 0.00 ò.Od 5.434.:l6 07/14/00 FzABVARR ~ LUcrg coUNTY - ilóA1UJ ....." , VOID Us'tl 42- OB~2ÖOO fd 14-Jt1t-200ö i FUND: 140 - port & Airþött Fund CHEcK INVOIŒ VENOOR 00259086 12023819 Peabody Hotèl töTAL 11~.OO 115.00 FUND 'totAL: PAtm 1 · --~ '--'~--. )r,,5ENDA REQUEST ~M NO. c-2A , DATE: JULY 18, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] SUBMITTED BY: PUBLIC WORKS DEPT-ROAD & BRIDGE DIV. P:tIr:./ P. M. Bowers, Road & Bridge Mgr. Road & Bridge Division TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Final acceptance, approval of Final Change Order #1, release of retainage, and make final payment of $65,497.39 for the 1998-99 Annual Resurfacing Contract with Ranger Construction Industries, Inc. BACKGROUND: The original 1998-99 Road Resurfacing Contract for $779,646.17 has been completed. The Final Change Order is a decreasive change order in the amount of $124,672.29 which adjusts contract quantities to actual quantities used. FUNDS AVAILABLE: 101003-41132-563000-42003 - Transporation Trust/Local Option for Resurfacing PREVIOUS ACTION: The 1998-99 Resurfacing Contract was awarded May 25,1999 in the amount of $779,646.17. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance, approval of Final Change Order #1 which will decrease the contract amount by $124,672.29 to a final contract amount of $654,973.88, authorize the Chairman to sign the Change Order, release of retainage, and make final payment of $65,497.39 for the 1998-99 Annual Resurfacing Contract with Ranger Construction Industries, Inc. COMMISSION ACTION: r] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED [X]Public Works Director [ ]Finance (check for copy only, if applicable) Jr LL..~ / , Coordination/Signatures [X]Mgt. & BUdgetd) ()) f'rl>¡ [ ]Co. Eng. [ ]Purchasing [X]Road & Bridge/Project Mgr. [X]County Attorney CO~ISSION REVIEW: July 1~OOO ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Public Works Director Road & Bridge ManagerM July 18, 2000 VIA: DATE: SUBJECT: Final acceptance, approval of Final Change Order #1, release of Retainage, and make final payment of $65,497.39 for the 1998-99 Annual Resurfacing Contract with Ranger Construction Industries, Inc. BACKGROUND: The contract was awarded to the contractor, Ranger Construction Industries, Inc. on May 25,1999 for resurfacing of identified roads. The total contract amount was $779,646.17. The work has now been completed and the Final Change Order is a deductive change order in the amount of $124,672.29. By allowing staff to adjust quantities in the field to react to the changing nature of the various roadways, the County was able to resurface additional streets in White City and along Indian River Drive within the project budget. Final Change Order #1 adjusts contract quantities on the various roadways to reflect field measured quantities and provides a final accounting of the exact dollar amounts expended on each of the roads within the contract. This has been done to facilitate record keeping for the various county agencies and departments involved in the accounting process. The $124,672.29 will be added to the 1999/2000 Resurfacing Program. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance, approval of Final Change Order #1 which will decrease the contract amount by $124,672.29 to a final contract amount of $654,973.88, authorize the Chairman to sign the Change Order, release of retainage, and make final payment of $65,497.39 for the 1998-99 Annual Resurfacing Contract with Ranger Construction Industries, Inc. agenda.req.OO CHANGE ORDER ST. LUCIE COUNTY PR'OJECT: I (name, address) 1998-99 ~ CHANGE ORDER NUMw!tR: RESURFACING CONTRACT INITIATION DATE: 6-19-00 TO (Contractor): RANGER CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES, INC. P.O. BOX 14589 FT. PIERCE, FL 34979 ATTN: J. KELLY CRICK CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO.: N/A ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONTRACT NO: C99-05-45 I CONTRACT DATE: 5-25-99 You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: (Additional sheet attached as Exhibit A - Yes XDG~ The original (Contract Sum) ~Uå:~munuCŒst) was .......................... $ Net change by previous authorized Change orders ..................................... $ The (Contract Sum) (~~mMuk1UlIU{CCI'Q) prior to this Change Order was ....... $ The (Contract Sum) (~Jn(HIIKCiU) will be ~UKä) (decreased or changed) by this Change Order ....................................................... The new (Contract Sum) ~~) including this Change Order will be The Contract Time will be ((:IQEBiØ) ~) (unchanged) by The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is: Funds Available: 779,646.17 iU¥ -0- 779,646~ 17 $ I 24 , 672 . 29 $ 654,973.88 ( 0) Days Account Number 101003-41132-563000-42003 The adjustment in Contract Price and/or Contract Time stated in this Change Order shall comprise the total price and/or time adjustment due or owed the Contractor for the work or changes defined in this Change Order. By executing this Change Order, the Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the stipulated price and/or time adjustments include the costs and delays for all work contained in the Change Order, including costs and delays associated with the interruption of schedules, extended overheads, delay, and cumulative impacts or ripple effect on all other non-affected work under this Contract. Signing of the Change Order constitutes full and mutual accord and satisfaction for the adjustment in contract price or time as a result of increases or decreases in costs and time of performance caused directly and indirectly from the Change Order, subject to the current scope of the entire work as set forth in the Contract Documents. Acceptance of this waiver constitutes an agreement between the County and Contractor that the Change Order represents an equitable adjustment to the Contract, and that Contractor will waive all rights to file a claim on this Change Order after it is properly executed. All work performed under this Change Order shall be performed in accordance with the contract specifications. Recommended: Approved: ST. LUCIE COUNTY ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION ST. LUCIE COUNTY PUBLIC WORKS DEPT. Architect/Engineer St. Lucie County Department 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE, FT. PIERCE, FL 34982 2300 VIRGINIA AVENUE, FT. PIERCE, FL 34982 Address~ ~ _ ~ Address By P. M. BOWERS, R & B MANAGER Date Agreed To: RANGER CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES, INC. Contractor P. . XI 5 A dre By/ WHITE - VENDOR By RAY WAZNY, PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR Date Authorized: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS St. Lucie County: 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 By JOHN D. BRUHN, CHAIRMAN Approved as to Form and Correctness Date County Attorney GREEN - PURCHASING PINK - DEPARTMENT o o ~~ -- - CD :ë o :2 x w - c Q) E - III :::::J :c « - u (I .... - c o U cð >. (I a.. ro c ...,ü: U Q) 'õ' '- 0. C) c .- u ~ :J en Q) Q:- O)~ Q) 0) D:: «; I W 0 CO C "'0 0) D:: Q) 0) 0 ~ 'C"" o. W¡,,;à:~ c).8o- .;.;Zu.... u (I Q) Q) c( .b .2 ;.... 'ê' OJ: § Õ :g a.. UZ« ~ "'wI 0) 0) - ,..... C\ - co 0 .... CD 0 M 0> 0 N 0 CD ~ 0 0 0 0 0 co co 0 co 0> 0> -.r 0 0 I'- N I'- 0 0 0 0 0 M co C'Ì lei M oi ci C'Ì ci g M a5 .... ci ci ci ci ci oi M 'i ~ M M N 0> 0 co foI') 0> co foI') foI') foI') foI') foI') co I'- C co co -.r .... 0 0 N .... 1'-. foI') -.r 0> ¡¡ ï: Ö tÒ ai ai tÒ ai foI') foI') .... ri 1, 0. I() I'- foI') CD foI') M foI') foI') M .... foI') foI') CD foI') foI') foI') I() ~ CD 0 r::- ~ ê N Ô co ~ 0 0 0 0 (Õ' 0 ãì M 0 0 ~ 0 I'- -.r 0 C! 0 0 0 N C! N ... ;i'i .... ;i'i ci .... ~ M ci QÓ C'Ì oi 0 ci ci ci M 0 C'Ì - G) ;z foI') I() co 0> N CD co foI') foI') foI') foI') CD foI') I'- Ó U I(). .... I() I'- .... N -.r foI') -.r ... CD ï: ... ri ri ..¡ ai ~foI') ~ ~ ~ ..¡ 0 0. N I() 6It ~foI') N foI') .... ... ~ ~ CD co ~ 0 0 I() 0 0 ~ 0 co 0 0 0 0 co co I'- CD co 0> C7! I'- 0 0 I'- ~ 0 0 0 0 N M .... 'i r-: r-: oi oi .... r-: M ci ... C'Ì ... ci ci ci ci M oi cò c G) I'- I'- CD 0> I() M co foI') N N [õ foI') foI') foI') foI') CD co ;Z ã u N N N ... I() M .... co 1'-. .... -.r ï: ai ai !Ô ai ai ai foI') foI') foI') foI') ri ai ï: 0. ... N N 6It CD foI') N foI') foI') I'- 0 M M foI') foI') I'- foI') foI') foI') 0> co CD 0 ... I'- 0 N I() ~ N 0 0 0 0 0 I'- -~ I() :8 I() M -.r I'- M ... .... ... M 0 1'-. I'- CD ... co co - ri !Ô Ö Ñ .... ai c c ... ... I() N N ¡¡ co N ro :I a - ~ ;~ co M CD 0 ãì N ê N it) 0> c::¡- o 0 0 0 a 0 0 co CD co 0 0 M I() N ... co I'- -.r I'- N !:?. co ~ ~ - ~ ri ai ,..: Ó c ~ I() 0 co 0 0 :I 0 a ~ ~ ... .... 0 0 0 I() 0 0 0 I() -.r 0 0 0 0 N I'- I() 10 0> M M [õ 0 I'- 0 .... .... "<t M M co 0 III M M co CI co Ñ Ñ !Ô Ñ ... Ñ (¡) ... .... I() -.r I'- ï: :I .... - 0 a (I Q) CD co .... M M I'- .... co co -.r N 0 0 0 0 M co Q) CD co 0> ~ N .... co -.r ~ ... co 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ 'g G) cò cò ci .... ci ci ci ci ... C'Ì ci ci ci lei lei ... ~ U N N 6It foI') foI') foI') foI') 4I't foI') foI') -.r -.r 0 I'- co co ãi ï: 6It foI') foI') .... ... N ... foI') N 0. foI') 6It 6It foI') foI') 0 !l 'E ~ C C ~ ~ u.: u.: u.: u.: u.: u.: 0 0 co co co co co co co ..... ..... en en .J .J .J .J .J .J w w w w w w w . ~ ~ u W . 0 -g . ·C ~ ø ~ . 0 ~ 0 It'! J: a::: ...J a::: :I: E ãì co e z ü .c ... u. w - co u ~ ë ~ ::E 0 a:: U'J E Õ c co ãj CI . . . . 8 0 't: > Q) c: . :J E c¡:: co G) Q) G) G) Q) G) ~ G) ª ... G) ~ ~ ¿ Q) CI CI CI CI CI > :g :E co co co co co ï: - - co c. c. 0 0 (/) (/) (/) (/) UI CI (/) U ... Õ Õ E E (/) UI UI (/) UI (/) UI CII [ij ëV a. $ 32 U'J U'J 0 ... Q) G) Q) G) G) Q) Q) G) .t:: .r:. - U'J E ::E ::E ::E ::E ::E ::E ::E c c. c. [ij ~ Q) Q) G) G) G) .t:: .r:. E ~ ~ .t:: G) I-;' I-;' E E E E E E c. c. c. C. .t:: (") (") ~ ë :'; :'; :'; I-;' G) Q) a.. a.. a. a.. a.. a.. a. G) U'J U'J CJ) c. c. rh rh CI E I.) I.) I.) :g :'; :'; ëV ëVëVëVëV ëV ëV Q) G) G) ª Q) !E !E !E Õ U'J U'J ï:ï ïJü·üï:ïÜü U'J G) 8. 8. 8. 8. 8. .! § c. c. > !! !! !! . . c. >. >. ~ co . co -.r ..... ..... a. ..... ..... t- -.r .... N U'J U'JU'JU'JU'JU'JCJ) (I It'! c ... CD 4: 4: CD Ü 0 w u. ø Q 'g E ãi ~ ~ m Ò Ò 4: ~ <.> 4: ü 0 M (") (") CO) CO) M M - ~ I'- I'- ... N ~ ~ ~ '7 '7 ... '7 '7 '7 ... ~ à:J Ò Ò Ò , , ... .... ... ... ... .... ... ... ... ... ... ... CO) M N ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... (") M (") I() I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- ~ o <") -- o u ....... " APPLlC'" A TION FOR NO. .8. AND FINAL PAYMENT \...I (The following to be completed bv the Contractof:)" PROJECT NAME: ST.LUCIE COUNTY ANNUAL RESURFACING ENGINEER'S PROJECT NO. : OWNER: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA CONTRACTOR: RANGER CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES,INC. CONTRACT DATE APPLICATION AMOUN $65,493.11 APPLICATION DATE FoR PERIOD ENDING: 4/30/00 INITIAL CONTRACT AMT. BASED ON EST. QTY. ~ (Revised 10/1/99) 6/8/99 6/12/00 $779,646.17 TABULATION OF AMOUNT DUE THIS APPLICATION BY CONTRACTOR AS APP BY ENG ORIGINAL CONTRACT AMOUNT COMPLETED TO DATE (See Attached "Estimate of Completed Work") $779,646.17 $ ~5lf '173. 13 $ $ $ $ CHANGE ORDER NO. CHANGE ORDER NO. CHANGE ORDER NO. CHANGE ORDER NO. @ $124 672 29%COMPLETE @ %COMPLETE @ %COMPLETE @ %COMPLETE (+ ($124,672.29) (+ $ (+ $ (+ $ TOTAL WORK TO DATE (+ LESS PREVIOUS PAYMENT (-) SUB-TOTAL LESS FAILED LAB. TESTS (-) $654,973.88 ($589,476.49) $65,497.39 : ;i{/~~l;~~ $ Ia~ I ¿¡ 97 I ~ ~ $ 0 Previous payr:nents: 9 #1-1$ sa"l LiliÞ.l ,: ¡( $ Total $ S ðq ,1J7" ''f 9 AMOUNT DUE FINAL PAYMENT, EXCEPT FOR ANY LIQUIDATED DAMAGES ASSESSED BY BOARD $65,497.39 CONTRACTOR'S AFFIDAVIT The undersigned Contractor hereby swears under penalty of pe~ury that all obligations incurred by the Contractor under this Contract to date have been discharged in full; that no suits are pending in connection with the work under the Contract; that the Contractor agrees to the total final price of $ 'S 1/-, 9 7.3 . f 8 and final payment of $ '5 J 1197. 3 ~ as full settlement of this account under the Contract and of all claims in connection therewith. BY: RANGER CONSTRUCTION INDUSTRIES, INC. ~ c;. &~ TITLE: G. CORREA DATE: ~ VICE PRESIDENT CONT COUNTY OF STATE OF\ Before me this 28 day of JUNE, 2000, personally appeared Miguel G. Correa, known to me, who being duly sworn, did depose and say that he is the VICE PRESIDENT of the Contractor above mentioned; that he prepared attached application for payment and executed abov on behalf of said Contractor; a herein are true, correct, an ~ Of FiO ALEA BACCHUS .. 11 My commission expires: ;! NOTARY ó My Comm Exp. 12128/2001 OIl PUBLIC )0 No. CC 705025 Known I J O1her 1.0. (The following to be completed bv thé-Engineef:)" TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA The attached application for payment by the Contractor has been reviewed b the En ineer and hereby approves the final payment under this application in amount of $ S . , less liquidated damages assessed by Board, WITH ACTUAL PAYMENT SUBJECT T CONTRACTOR SIGNING ABOVE AFFIDAVIT. DATE APPROVED BY ST. LUCIE COUNTY ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION ~~ P. M. Bowers Road & Bridge Manager Cal. Days Cal. Days Cal. Days Cal. Days Cal. Days CHECKED BY Ray Wazny, P. E. Public Works Director t7..ew.t¡ "~LfbI1 Contract Time Began: Substantial Completion on: Actual Construction Time: Contract Construction Time: Rainy Days Allowance: Other Overrun Allowances: Net Overrun: PREPARED BY 51. Lucie County Road & Bridge Division J ...... ...... ~ .. M .:~ ~ ~ 't:: .¡: .. 0 0 ·EÙ:~Ü: ~ "5' ~ -5 C CO II) ro .. -= Æ -~ Æ ~II .~ .§ ~ .§ \oHJ COc:ro C Eo.: roo.. ~ 'i 1ií (I) iií ~ð~§~ ~ z o ~ ¡¡¡ :5 a w 0:: I- Z w :IE w ~ Go I- (.) ~ I- Z o (.) 'It: Q C.I 'õ > .E en N 'P" en 'It: (3 It: (!) z (3 < II.. It: ::J U) W It: .J < ::J Z Z < ~ Z ::J o o w (3 ::J .J I- U) ~ Z LO::J MO MO ~w ......(3 ~::J (I).J ::JI- üu) '-" '.."I 0 ...... co 0 co .,. co co (') 0> N c::> co 0> 0> 0 ,... ~ N (') .,. 0 · ,... 0 0 0 0 , 0 Iii C"i 0; .t C"i 0; c:i N c:i 0 , 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , , , N ã) W (') (') N 0> co 0> co 0 co 0> I- co co .,. ...... ,.... .... .,. 0 0 N e( ci IÔ ai ai .... ri IÔ ai Q 10 ,... co (') ~ (') .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ... ~ ... ... ~ ... ... ... ... ... I!! I- , 0 0 , 0 0 , , , 0 , · 0 , 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0 , , , , , 0 0 0 0 z z ;:) w 0 0:: ::E 0:: e( ;:) u ... ~ ... ... ~ ... ... ... ... ... ~ ~ ... ... ... ... ... ... ~ ... ... ... ~ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 0 ã) co 0 co ~ co co (') 0> N 0 0> 0> , ,... N (') .,. c::> · ,... 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 , 0 0 0 , 0 0 , , N Iii C"i 0; .t C"i 0; c:i c:i , , en ã) N ;:) M M N 0> co ~ co 0 co 0> 0 co co .,. .... ,.... .,. 0 0 N :> ci IÔ ai ai .... .... ri IÔ ai w 10 ,... co M 0:: M .... II. ... ... ... ... ~ ... ... ... ... ... ... ~ ... ~ ... ... ... ... ... ~ ... ... ~ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 c::> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I- 0; cO cO c:i c:i .t N N ,..: · ,..: c:i N c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i e( 10 co 10 M M .... ,... M Q C;; L() M 0 co ,... ,... co co 0 N Ñ 0> ~ .... .... 10 N N en I- w Z ¡:: W 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¡:: 0:: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Z 0:: c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i e( ;:) ;:) u CJ en 0 0 0 0 0 ;:) 0 0 0 0 0 c::> 0 0 0 0; 0 cO c:i 0 0 0 0 0 ,..: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :> cO 0 ~ c::> 0 0 · ,... 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 L() M ,..: W C;; co (') 0 c:i N N ,... ,... c:i M c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i 0:: L() 0 N co .... .... 0> co .... co .... 10 N N II. N co co 0 0 0 0 co co co 0 L() 0 ,... co co 0> 0> ~ ,... .a: N M ~ ,... 0 , 0 , , , , 0 , , , 0 0 0 , , , , .... I- ,..: ,..: 0; 0; N C"i 0; ,..: C"i , , cO u .... .... :¡:; ..J ~ ,... ,... co 0> N N ,... co co M co .,. ~ N N N .... co ,.... 10 .... .,. 10 M .... co I- ai ai cti ai .... ri ai ai ai ~ Z N N co N ,... 0 M (') ,... u ... ... ~ ... ... ~ ... ... ~ ... ... ... ... ~ ~ ... ... ... ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ... ... ... ... ~ I- ~ U 0 0 L() ~ ¡:: :¡:; .... 0 ,... L() 0> M 0 10 .,. ,... M 10 0 Z M (') 0 ,... 0 N L() 0 0 0 0 0 0 l- e( N N co N (') co .... .... · N M Z ;:) .... .... co L() ,... oJ 0 .... c( u CJ I- 0 I- co co .... (') co .,. N (') co (') ,... è'õ co 0 0 0 0 I- W co ~ 0> <'? ~ .... co ~ 0 N .... .,. 0 0 0 0 (.) u cO co c:i .... .... N c:i .... .t c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i c:i Iii Iii ~ it: N N .,. co 0 .,. 0 ,... co N .... .... N .... l- II. Z I- 0 Z (.) ;:) I- Z Z Z >- >- u... u... c( c( c( u... u... II.. u... c( c( c( c( ;:) l- I- en en ..J ..J W W W ..J ..J ..J ..J W W W W ~ a 0 0 z w 0 0:: 0 a 0:: CD C) >- m it: ëo :., < :::E :::E 0 0:: ..J 0:: :::E 0 < :::E w z 0 CD ~ N W ë :::E 0 ii: (,) z < w w C) (,) w 0:: 0 LL Q. Q. < W W w II. w w w w w ¡:: LL it: it: (J ~ C) Q. it: :I: C) ~ * C) II. 0 (J < it: I- < < l- I- I- it: Ü'> 0 (J (J w (J II) I- (J (J (J (J (J u ~ 0:: :::E (J (J (J (J :., (J (J (J (J en Q. (,) (,) ~ w w (,) w w w w w :I: ¡¡: ¡¡: :::E :::E (,) ¡¡: :::E :::E :::E :::E :::E :::E w C) Q. 0:: Q Z en w LL LL ~ I- ¡¡: LL ~ 0:: ~ ~ ~ ~ I- < I- < < Q. > LL < W -' ::; ~ 0:: 0:: < 0:: :I: < w C) l- I- -' < 0:: l- I- :I: > < Q. Q. II. Q. Q. II. Q. W Z a a Ü (,) (,) I- a (,) a (,) (,) (,) (,) < ..J ::; ~ ::; ::; w w W Q. ::; W ::; W W W W '" '" -' 0 0 Q. Q. Q. S2 0 Q. 0 Q. Q. Q. Q. (J en :¡ Q. en en en en II) en (J en en en (J en en (") 0> C"i ,... 0> i, co éñ'.,. "'10 :;;<0 .,.r-- -.,. L() - coO> ~CX) 10 ...~ CI> en I') I') ,..: ~ CI> .,. en ,,¡ ~ fÞ IÒ CD ... .... éñ'.,. <'?LO ,... . 0>«> .,.r-- -.,. L() - coO> ~ CX) 10 ...~ GI CI ftI C 3 GI ~ C 0 ;::; ¡ii 'S 0- GI~ It: III :ë ... Q = Q ... c = 0 E < .,. .,. M 0> C"i ,... 0> .¡ L() co ... ::E a.. «> ~ o o ã5 N <õ - CJ ( ) 'õ' "- D- C) c 'u ~ ::s tn ( ) 0:: C» __ C» _ 8ø88~~8~~~~88 8~ ~~~~~~gg~~~ggggg~ _.coco..,......õo N..........'" ..,. $æãg~~~å ~~~ ~ =: 1;; I~ .. 0: I~ Go s~g:88888888888 ~~m~:8~:;~Opf~~NOc::i :5Ë......U'>&<"l0.,............ CO....CO OMfDON....ø¡ U...... _Lt)C\I~ 0000 0000 oc:i0!i 8ø88~g8~~~~88888~ ~~~~~~gg~~~ggggg~ _..~~._õo N-~~ ~ ~~g~m¡~~ ~~~ ~ I-a..~;; .... It II ~ .. Go S~g:88888888888~~~~ :: i m ~ :8 g :; ~ 0 pf '!2 ~ N 0 c:i ._ :58;;icô~~-~~ CO..... u- ....I()C\I~ 8ø88~~888~~88888~ ~~~~~~ggg~~ggggg~ _.coco..,......coO» a~ ..,. ~~g~àm~~ ~ I-4.M...... ... t.4 ~~ I\: I .. 0: ~ Go s~~~~~~~~ =-!m~~~iñ:goo 5 =§ .....U')_t"').o_~o»_ (")(00('1,10(1') ..... ....U')NCJ> ~ 8ø88~:¡¡8 ~ ~~~m~~a õ¡;~~~~;2~ ~cta~""~ £;t '" .. 1;; ~ ~ ..~g::gg::;lõ° - . . M 0 r-- C"') _i. a........... ë-~~~&:t~~ ::)8~¿ - :. ë ~b18ga;:!g ~_ ~~sg~~g o~~~gà ~~ t-a..N.... '" ~~ ;¡; I ~ ~ Go !!~~~o~~o -igjN- .- ~~~!~ ~;: CJ .. .. I .. 0: ~ Go ~ 5!888~¡¡:8 ~:¡¡3~~gg§~g ~- ooc .. .... ....Go~~ .1() It) 0 -.. -~-- ;§~riri 08:50 ~ - . ~ ~~~~~~~ !i!:¡¡3N~aaaaa -I~'C~N. 888888888 ci~Noocic:io""': PI 8~~88888~ g~~ggggg~ ~ ri ~ O~NOOOOO~ 8:58888888 g:gggggggg N ~ 000000000 ~ 8:58888888 g:gggggggg N ~ 000000000 ~ 888888888 ggggggggg :8 ..; ~ ~ .. ~ :8 g :8 !II !!: MOM tD ,..: :;¡ .. :;¡ !;; , "i. "i. ri =ï co 10 V) lilt ~ ~ ~ ,...., ., ., ..; ~ .. "i. ., ~ :3 ~ , II) = ,.) ,..: cD øt ,þ ,... at ...... CD 0 m ..,. ..,. N C'I!. 'i :2 i ~ ~ co .. '" I() ~ ~ ~ ::! .; .. .. ! ~ ~ :ö 111 :;¡ ~ ¡ ¡ ~ ¡ i !- ¡ ~ g :£ ~ ~ ~ .. ., :! .. .; .. .. ~ cø at ...... It) ~ ; ~ ; ~ ~ M co co II) ~ å g ~ ~ lilt W"W N " o .. ,.: :!! ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ 5 g P! ~ ! ~ ,.: .; ,¡ ...."' ,.: :s: = ~ ~ ~ tit tilt tit ... ~ ..; .. ., .; ~ ~ ~ I') P! ~ ~ ::i a ; ! ~ ! ~.. ~ fi i .. tit ; tit tit '" o ~ .; '" o . ~ ! rõ aft : ::I N G N ,...: ~ ~ ~ ^" - - ~ """'" ITEM NO. C2b DATE: 7/18/00 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: (X) SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS - ADMIN TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Request for the Board of County Commissioner to approve a Temporary Non-Exclusive Drainage Easement with St. Lucie West. BACKGROUND: The Temporary Non-Exclusive Drainage Easement will allow for drainage out fall across St. Lucie West Property. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff Recommends that the Board approve the Temporary Non-Exclusive Drainage Easement and authorize the Chairman to sign. ~APPROVED o OTHER: o DENIED ~ COMMISSION ACTION: ~ County Attorney: 16 Review and Approvals ~ Management and BUdge~ MtvQ¡ ~ Purchasing: ~ ~ Originating Dept: (Pub. Wks.) Q. Other: Q. Other: Q. Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: '-' ....,¡ Return to: (enclose self-addressed stamped envelope) A TEMPORARY NON-EXCLUSIVE DRAINAGE EASEMENT Name: Michael T. Kolodziejczyk Address: Lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc. 590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9 Port S1. Lucie, Florida 34986 This instrument Prepared by: Michael T. Kolodziejczyk Address: Lawson, Noble, and Webb, Inc. 590 NW Peacock Blvd., Suite 9 Port S1. Lucie, FL 34986 Space above this line for processing data Space above this line for recording data THIS TEMPORARY NON-EXCLUSIVE DRAINAGE EASEMENT, executed this 6·-ti,day of \f 01 Ý , 2000, by St. Lucie West Devélopment Corp. ("SLWDC") whose post office act.<1ress is 1850 SW Fountainview Boulevard, Suite 201, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986, first party, to St. Lucie County. ("SLC") whose post office address is 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982, second party: (Wherever used herein the terms "first party" and second party" shall include singular and plural, heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, wherever the context so admits or requires.) Witnesseth: That the said first party, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other good and valuable consideration, in hand paid by the second party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, together with all other covenants made by the second party and contained herein, has granted, bargained and sold unto the said second party, a temporary non-exclusive drainage easement over the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of St. Lucie, State of Florida, to-wit: See Exhibit "A" for the purposes of ingress, egress, construction, repair, installation and maintenance of drainage facilities, and related appurtenances, and not for video communications; and reserving unto the first party an easement over the described property for the purposes of ingress and egress tot he first party's property, and it shall be the duty of the second party to maintain and repair said facilities and to repair any damage to the describe property caused by the second party as may be required from time to time hereafter. IIPSL_FSIMAINIDataI200-299IB2 46lDocs\2000lB246.tempdrainageeasementS LC.doc '-' ~ The Grantor reserves the use of the easement property not inconsistent herewith, but no above ground building or structure (except fences, pavement, or sidewalks as may be authorized by the Grantee) shall be erected or placed on such lands by the Grantor. Any damage to fences, pavement, sidewalks or other improvements of the Grantor on the lands of the Grantor adjoining the easement premises, done by the Grantee in the installation, maintenance, operation, repair, replacement, or renewal of drainage and surface water management facilities, and any equipment and improvements or facilities connected therewith, shall be promptly repaired or compensated by the Grantee. The Easement granted herein shall remain in full force and effect until such time as Grantor may decide, in its sole and absolute discretion, to replat the Easement Parcel (or property which includes the Easement Parcel) wherein the Easement Parcel shall be dedicated (for the benefit of the Dominant Parcel and for purposes described herein) to the Grantee, or other entity as Grantor may deem appropriate in its sole discretion ("New Easement"). Upon dedication of the New Easemeht, this Easement Agreement and the Easement created herein shall automatically terminate and be of no further force or effect, without the necessity of any joinder or consent of Grantee. In Witness Whereof, the said first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in presence of: ~ÆA~[ ~ Witness S ature S)ìl~ eV E. SYìJ ~ Printed Náme L[~ --Witness Signature ~ By: t Deve~lo~t p. ~ . --! '--'- Y :S\,t~AtJ E ß'F"RG- Printed Name IIPSL_FSIMAINIData\200-299IB246IDocs\2000IB246.tempdrainageeasementS LC.doc '-' """" COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE ) )SS: ) STATE OF FLORIDA I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the State aforesaid and in the County aforesaid to take acknowledgements, the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me by Paul J. Heqener, the President, of S1. Lucie West Development Corp., authorized to do business in the State of Florida, freely and voluntarily under authority duly vested in him by said corporation, and that the seal affixed thereto is the true corporate seal of said corporation. He is personally known to me. . WITNESS.my hand and official seal in the County and State last aforesaid this ø day of CJ u)1 ' 2000. MY COMMISSION EXPIRES: . ' SJ.)\v"}€ý f. S m I~ Typed, primed or stamped name of Notary Public P OFFTC1ÄCNOTARY SEAL o"f>-?'Y 1I8~ SHIRLEY E SMITH ~ ~. () COMMSSION NUMBER .. l'" ~ ,~ c( CC639712 7.... ¡ MY COMMISSION EXPIRES (:" OF F\.o MAY 4,2001 IIPSL FSIMAINIDataI200-299IB246IDocsI2000lB246.tempdrainageeasementS LC.doc '-" ""'" ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT The above easement is hereby accepted this _ day of ,2000. Attest: ST. LUCIE COUNTY , Chairman * * * * * * . * * * * STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of . 2000 by as chairman OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, on behalf of the County. He/She is _ personally known to me, or _ who has produced as identification and who did/ did not take an oath. Notary Public-State of Florida [Notary Seal or Stamp] Print Name: My Commission Expires: Accepted as to form: County Attorney 1:\Data\200_299\B246\Docs\2000\B246.tempdrainageeasementSLC.doc .-.. LJ\;\\' . . . . . . . . . . . ...- Lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc.LB -6674 ENGINEERS · PLANNERS SURVEYORS 590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Port SI. Lucie, Florida 34986 (561) 878-1700 . fox: (561) 878-1802· emoil: Inw-psl@lnw-inc.com West Palm Beach· Port St. Lucie DESCRIPTION DESCRIPTION: DRAINAGE EASEMENT A STRIP OF LAND 40 FOOT IN WIDTH FOR DRAINAGE PURPOSES LYING OVER AND ACROSS A PORTION OF PARCEL 21D, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF ST. LUCIE WEST PLAT NO. 107, 2ND REPLAT IN PARCEL 21 AND RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 37, PAGES 19, 19A THRU 19C, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCE AT A POINT ON THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID PARCEL 210, SAID POINT BEING THE EASTERLY END OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3708.28 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, (AND ALONG THE SAID NORTHERLY LINE OF PARCEL 21D), THRlJ A CENTERAL ANGLE 10°25'45", AN ARC DIST ANCE OF 674.99 FEET TO THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE PROPOSED PLAT OF ST. LUCIE WEST PLAT NO. 127; THENCE TRAVERSING THE BOUNDARY OF SAID PROPOSED PLAT NO. 127 BY THE FOLLOWING TWO (2) COURSES; 1. SOUTH 03°28'43" WEST, ALONG A RADIAL LINE TO SAID CURVE, I:::. 015T I:::.NCE OF=' 694.00 FFET TO I:::. POINT OF RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3014.28 FEET; 2. WESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THRU A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 02°52'04", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 150.87 FEET TO A POINT OF NON RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A LINE (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 00°36'39" WEST FROM THIS POINT) SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE SOUTH 00·00'00" WEST ALONG SAID LINE, DEPARTING SAID PROPOSED PLAT NO. 127, A DISTANCE OF 12.54 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 30.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THRU A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°00'00", AN ARC DIST ANCE OF 47.12 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 344.51 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 01°32'36" EAST, A DIST ANCE OF 40.01 FEET; THENCE NORTH 90°00'00" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 345.59 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE WITH A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORTHEAST AND HA VING A RADIUS OF 70.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE, THRU A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 90°00'00", AN ARC DISTANCE OF 109.96 FEET TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE; THENCE NORTH 00.00'00" EAST ALONG SAID LINE, A DISTANCE OF 12.70 FEET TO A POINT OF NON RADIAL INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 3014.28 FEET (THE RADIUS POINT OF SAID CURVE BEARS SOUTH 00°08'58" EAST FROM THIS POINT) SAID POINT ALSO LYING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID PROPOSED PLAT NO. 127; THENCE EASTERLY ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE AND SAID SOUTHERLY LINE, THRU A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 00°45'37", AN ARC DIST ANCE OF 40.00 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING.. . .........-: CHAEL T. KOLODZIEJ , PSM PROFESSIONAL SURVEYOR AND MAPPER STATE OF FLORIDA REG. NO. 3864 B461SK01.dwg 5-30-00 1I,58A3 0.1"1 EST SHEET 1 OF 2 JOB No. B461 BY: GRB CHECKED: MTK F.B. N/A PG. N/ A DA TE: 5- 30-00 ,-,. L~\\' LEGEND: P.O.B. POINT OF BEGINNING P.O.C. POINT OF COMMENCEMENT DE. DRAINAGE EASEMENT rr.. PROPERTY LINE R/W DENOTES RIGHT -OF -W A Y R DENOTES RADIUS 6. DENOTES DEL T A L DENOTES ARC LENGTH <l DENOTES CENTERLINE . . . . . . . . . . . . ..- Lawson, Noble & Webb, Inc. LB -6674 ENGINEERS PLANNERS· SURVEYORS 590 NW Peacock Boulevard, Suite 9, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 (561) 878-1700 . fax: (561) 878-1802· email: Inw-ps!@lnw-inc.com West Palm Beach· Port St. Lucie SKETCH TO ACCOMPANY DESCRIPTION - o o 0J II - ~ W ...J « u (f) N.W UNIVERSITY Bl VD. 150' PUBLI C R/>N- - - - ---- -------- -------- -- ;- - -- --=--_ --"'1L20~VA~ILITY EAS~~ - -~ R=3708.28' 6.=10·25'45" L=674.99' - PROPOSED ST. LUCIE WEST PLAT NO. 127 EASTERL Y END OF CURVE HAVING A RADIUS OF 3708.28' ;: ...J~ b <t~ 0 .....ro . 0C\J <;;t" <to 0) cr::~ t.O o en ëo <;;t" - C\JP""" . C\J ro <;t I() . õ. 0 ~C\J~ 1/ ?, 1/ Q:<]-J ~ R=30.00' 6.=90·00'00" L=47.12' PARCEL 210 ST. LUCIE WEST PLAT NO. 107 2ND REPLA T IN PARCEL 21 PLAT BOOK 37, PAGES 19, 19A-19C S00008'58"E RADIAL 2-1 R= 70.00' ~=90·00'OO" L=109.96' 40' D.E. N90·00'OO"W 345.59' SOl·32'36"E 40.01' S PROPOSED WATER MANAGEMENT TRACT SOD036'39"W RADIAL PROPOSED 20' LAKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT NOTE: THIS IS NOT A SKETCH OF SURVEY, but only 0 grophic depiction of the description shown hereon. There hos been no field work, viewing of the subject properly or monuments set in connection with the preporotion of the informotion shown hereon. NOTE: Londs shown hereon were not abstracted for right-of-way ond/or easements of record. SEE SHEET 1 OF 2 FOR DESCRIPTION B461SK01.dwg 5-30-00 11,58,43 elM EST SHEET 2 OF 2 JOB No. B461 BY: GRB CHECKED: MTK F.B. N/A PG. N/ A DA TE: 5-30-00 '-" ......, AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. c-3A DATE: July 18, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Deputy Sheriffs' Blanket Bond. BACKGROUND: See attached Memorandum No. 00-1029. FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chainnan to execute the bond. COMMISSION ACTION: E: CONCU (X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: o las Anderson unty Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget purchasing Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 # '-' """ INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO: 00-1029 DATE: July 10, 2000 SUBJECT: Deputy Sheriffs' Blanket Bond BACKGROUND: Captain Thomas J. McInerney, of the St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office, has requested that the attached Deputy Sheriff's Blanket Bond for 369 Deputies, be signed by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to execute the bond. DSM/cac Attachment ,¡. ~ """'" DEPUTY SHERIFFS BLANKET BOND The Deputy Sheriffs' Blanket Bond covers sworn deputies for the faithful performance of their duties of the Sheriffs office. Effective July 1, 1998, Florida Statutes now indicate that the bond be provided as required by the Board of County Commissioners. Please indicate below and return to us in the self-address envelope if you wish to continue or cancel this bond. Please continue the Deputy Sheriffs Blanket Bond [X] Please cancel the Deputy Sheriffs Blanket Bond D If yes, please indicate number of deputies to be covered under the bond 13 b11 ~~,~~ o 6 - :2 ! -0 ¿J Date St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Date '-' ""'" AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C./· J ß DATE: July 18,2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: Board of County Commissioners PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Katherine Mackenzie-Smith Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Partial Release of Lien for St. Lucie County Code Enforcement Board Order Imposing Fine/Lien dated October 6, 1999 and recorded in Official Record Book 1261, Page 1793, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chainnan to sign the attached Partial Release of Lien. [ i APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: COMMISSION ACTION: I\<;t,~ County Attorney: /¿/~ (..; Review and Approvals Management & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept. Sheriff: Other: Finance: '-' ...., INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFFICE TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Katherine Mackenzie-Smith, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 00-1031 DATE: July 11,2000 SUBJECT: Partial Release of Lien for St. Lucie County Code Enforcement Board Order Imposing Fine/Lien dated October 6, 1999 and recorded in Official Record Book 1261, Page 1793, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida BACKGROUND: On October 6, 1999, the St. Lucie County Code Enforcement Board found the property at 102 N. FFA Road, Fort Pierce, Florida, to be in violation. A mortgage foreclosure suit and the Notice of Lis Pendens were filed on June 26, 1998. The Summary Judgment of Foreclosure was entered on January 18, 2000 and the property was sold on February 18, 2000. The Code Enforcement Lien was not recorded until November 10, 1999. Based on the above sequence of events and pursuant to Section 48.23, Florida Statutes (1999), the above referenced Code Enforcement Board lien is not a lien on the property at 102 N. FF A Road, Fort Pierce, Florida. Section 48.23, Florida Statutes in pertinent part states: "... the filing for record of such notice of lis pendens shall constitute a bar to the enforcement against the property described in said notice of lis pendens of all interests and liens... and if such proceedings are prosecuted to a judicial sale of the property described in said notice of lis pendens, the property shall be forever discharged from all such unrecorded interests and liens..." Fidelity National Title Insurance Company requests a Partial Release of Lien (attached). The Partial Release of Lien will not release the lien from any other property owned by the violator. '-' ......, RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the chairman to sign the attached Partial Release of Lien. Respectfully submitted, /H~ Katherine Mackenzie-Smith Assistant County Attorney KMS/mt Attachment '-' ....,; PARTIAL RELEASE St. Lucie County, holder of the instrument described below, in consideration of $10 and other valuable consideration received, does hereby release the following described real property from the following instrument. Subject Instrument: St. Lucie County Code Enforcement Board Order Imposing Fine/Lien dated October 6, 1999 and recorded in Official Record Book 1261, Page 1793, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Real Property Released: 1035 39 FROM NE COR OF S Y2 OF W 1/4 OF SW 1/4 OF NW 1/4 RUN W 160 FT FOR POB, TH CONT W 111.03 FT TO E R/W FFA RD, TH S 337.8 FT, TH E 111 FT, TH N 337.65 FT TO POB (0.86 AC) MAP 23/1 ON) OR 1023 PG 1835 ofthe Public records of St. Lucie County, Florida. THIS P ARTIAL RELEASE DOES NOT CONSTITUTE A SATISFACTION OR A RELEASE OF ANY PROPERTY OTHER THAN THE PROPERTY DESCRIBED ABOVE. Done this day of ,2000. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney STATE OF FLORIDA ) COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE ) The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of , 2000, by , who is personally known to me and who did/did not take an oath. Notary Public (Signature) f \ '-" AGENDA REQUEST ~EM NO. C3C- DATE: .July 18, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Donald G Cole Property Acquisition Manager SUB.JECT: Environmentally Significant Land Program lndrio North Savannas Project FCT#95-052-P56 Frederick - Parcel 70 BACKGROUND: Please see attached background memorandum. FUNDS A V AILABLE: Funds will be made available in account #382-3915-561000-310035 PREVIOUS ACTION: August 1, 1995 - Received Board of County Commission authorization to submit Grant Application to Florida Communities Trust (FCT) for the purchase ofIndrio North Savannas Project. March 26, 1996 - Received Board of County Commission approval of the Conceptual Approval Agreement with Florida Communities Trust to purchase the Indrio North Savannas Project. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Option Agreement for Parcel 70 highlighted in purple on the attached map, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct staff to close the transaction and record the document in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. [XJ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: COMMISSION ACTION: 9Y [X] County Attorney: \ [X]Originating DePt:~J U [X] Finance: (check for copy only, if applicable) ød15y, 'U r, h a' in 9 , _ [X]COmm.DeveloP:~ Effective 5/96 I .'-" "wi PROPERTY ACQUISITION DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners Donald G. Cole, Property Acquisition Manager July 18, 2000 Environmentally Significant Land Program Indrio North Savannas Project FCT#95-052-P56 Frederick - Parcel 70 BACKGR01JND: On March 26, 1996, the Board of County Commissioners approved the Conceptual Approval agreement with Florida Communities Trust (FCT) for the purchase of228 prºperties within theIndrio North Savannas Project. The Board authorized the use of $600,000 of the County Environmentally Significant Land (ESL) funds to match a 50% grant from FCT. On the attached map of the project, the parcel that is the subject of this request is highlighted in Pll!Ple. This parcel was negotIated at the Maximum Approved Value. The OptIOn Agreement for this subject parcel is available for your review in the Property Acquisitions Office. RECOMMENDATION / CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Option Agreement for Parcel 70 highlighted in purple on the attached map, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct staff to close the transaction and record the document in the Public Records oÍSt. Lucie County, Florida. 1 ~ CC: County Administrator County Attorney Community Development Director Leisure Services Director Finance Director Management & Budget Manager G:\ACQ\ WP\yYONNE\ENVLANDS\NINDRlO\AGENDAS\BCC July 18, 2000.wpd Project Boundary Closed Transaction - County Owned Options Approved - Closing Pending StiU Negotiating Executed Option Agreement t N ~GENDA REQUEST ITEIrlJO. C -312 DATE: July 18, 2000 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: South County Regional Stadium - Approval of Plat No. 127 BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the plat and authorize the Chairman to sign the plat. [X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Do las Anderson unty Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: ¡h/ Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing: ~ Originating Dept. Public Works Dir.:· ~- Co. Surveyor: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 ,. '-" '...I , INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 00-1037 DATE: July 12, 2000 SUBJECT: South County Regional Stadium - Approval of Plat No. 127 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: As part of the development of the Regional Stadium, the County needs to approve a plat (No. 127) of the parcel that was donated to the County by St. Lucie West Development Corp. A copy of the plat is attached. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the plat and authorize the Chairman to sign the plat. Respectfully submitted, DSM/caf Attachment AEON Ai£. BASED ON THAT PORTION Ck H£ NORTI-ERL Y LItlE Qof BEARS N. 76·œ'33- W. AS SHOWN ON ST. LUCIE WEST 37. PAŒ:S 19. 19A - 19C). Y KIN) Ck OBSTRUCTION SHALL BE PLACED ON EASEMENT. CTING CIACU..AR ~VES Ai£ RADIAL LN..ESS NOTED. 1AL. T, AS RECORDED IN ITS GRAPHIC FORM. IS TÆ CkFICIAL SlØ)IVIDED LAN)S DESCRIBED ÆREIN AN) WILL IN NO SLPPLAHTED IN AUTHORITY BY ANY OTtER GRAPHIC Tt£ PLAT. ~ MAY E ADDITJQNAL REITR1CTJQNI THAT N£ NOT . fIl.A T THAT WAY E fCUl) :IN Tt£ ". IC FECORD8 UlTY. rs ÇER1lf1CA TE: )A UCIE tFY THAT TI-£ PLAT AS SHOWN I-£REON IS A TRl£ AN) ENT A TION OF A SURVEY MADE LN>ER MY RESPONSIBLE lPERVISION A~ THAT SAID ~VEY IS ACClRATE TO THE ~LEDGE AN) BELIEF AND THAT PERMMENT REFERENCE ~ BEEN SET AW THAT PERMANENT CONTROl POINTS AND MONUMENTS ER TI-£ GUARANTEES POSTED WITH Tt-£: CITY COUNCIL OF PORT E REQUIRED IMPROVEMENTS, AND F~THER, THAT THE SURVEY ~ITH ALL Of TI-£ REQUIREMENTS Of CHAPTER 177, FLORIDA £N)ED, A~ IN ACCORDANCE WITH Tt-£: ~VEYING STAN:>ARDS IN CHAPTER 61617-6. FLORIDA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE. SET FORTH BOARD OF SLRVEYORS AN) MAPPERS ~SUANT TO SECTION \ STATUTES. AN) ORDINANCES Of Tt-£: CITY Of PORT ST. .---------------------- ------------------------------------ MICHAEL T. KOLOOZIEJCZYK. P.S.M. FLORIDA CERTIFICATE NO. 3864 STATE Of FLORIDA ; INSTRlJÆNT PREPARED BY aEJCZYI< P.S.M. 3864 STATE OF FLORIDA DlLE AN) WEBB, INC., LB NO. 6674 EERS PLAt#£RS SlRVEYORS LW. PEACOCK BlVD., SUITE 9 ORT ST. LUCIE, FLORIDA ~VEYOR SMElT 1 OF 2 8404 ., It ~ .. ...." AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO.C-4 DATE:7-18-00 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Veteran Services Paul J. Hiott, Director SUBJECT: Request for transfer of funds due to Y2K upgrades and re-location of offices. BACKGROUND: Funds of $979.68 are required for departments share of the cost of installing a new Bay Network Router (due to Y2K upgrades) at the South County Courthouse Annex building, where the Veteran Services offices are now located. Please see the attached letter of explanation from Information Technologies. Due to the fact that the cost of this Router is $979.68, this request is to transfer existing funds to the proper account of 001-5310-564000-500, machinery & equipment(capitalized). FUNDS AVAIL. : Funds will be made available in 001-5310-564000-500 by the attached Budget Amendment No. 00-146. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve EQOO-230 and BAOO-146. COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [ [ ] OTHER: DENIED D u as M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorn 'I. ;I{ oß Management & Budget' Purchasing Other: Other: , if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 ~ ...., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY May 26, 2000 Veterans Services ATTN: Paul Hiott 250 NW Country Club Drive Port St. Lucie, FL 34983 RE: Network Connection Structure Dear Mr. Hiott: As part of the counties Y2K upgrade, we have installed a new Bay Network Router to replace the old RND Router. This allows the different agencies to communicate with our network. We anticipated, based on vendors proposal that the new router would communicate with your current router. However, the technology is so advanced that it will be necessary to upgrade all WAN Routers to be compliant and communicate with the new infrastructure. In order for your agency to communicate with our network, your RND Router will need to be replaced with a Baystack ARN 10/100 Router. The cost of this new Router is $979.68. This upgrade is imperative for the network to continue to communicate accurately and without interruptions. We are planning the conversion July 1, 2000, and need your Purchase Order to enable us to purchase this Router for your connection to our network. Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter. If you have any concerns or questions, please call me at 561-462-1761. Respectfully Submitted, {J~ ?1?~ Bob Rosart Hardware Manager Information Technology -~ JOHN D. GRUHN. Disrrlcr No.1. DOUG COWARD, Dlsrricr No, 2 . PAULA A. LEWIS, Disrricr No, J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, Disrrlcr No.4· CLIFF GARNES, Disrricr No,S Counry Adminisrraror - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue. Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 · Phone (561) 462-1748 · Fox (561) 462-144.3 BRltas a...,ðGET AMENDMENT REQUEST ~M REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: PREPARED DATE: AGENDA DATE: Veteran Services 07/10/00 07/18/00 TO: 001-5310-564000-500 $980 Travel $680 $300 FROM: 001-5310-554200-500 001-5310-540000-500 Trainin -Seminars Re REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: to a de artment's share of new Sa Network Router, due to Y2K u rade. CONTINGENCY BALANCE: n/a THIS AMENDMENT: n/a REMAINING BALANCE: n/a DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: 00-146 m t C C 0 "wi <: m c '- ëñ "C =ã =! :Þ 3!: Õ ~ "T1 Z m Õ 3!: z m -4 » z ::a -4 :-:t m Õ D ;a!: z 23 0 §: ~ ~ ....... C) 0 Q) -< ~ C) ~ ::;, ~ I ~ ~ (') ..... 111 è)' C) CD -S. ~ ~ õ Q) C/) s: ëÐ :::0 ~ CD 0- " S C/) CD :::0 () 0 -Š 0 111 c:: CD c: C/) s: ::;, rT1 en en :::0 () CD :-t 0 Õ' m c:: £) ï ::;, .., c: ~ tD c: C') - ):a Q) "tI - ::;, '< š: m ::;, ~ m C') CD » z 0 >< ..... (;) -4 c: tD ~ m :::a z c:: =* Z ~ -. m §: c ::;,' ::0 » £) OJ ~ 0 c: 0 c:: :::a m ..... m en » r-- CD CD .., £) -4 :::a :Þ ~ Õ ::a c: "T1 C 0 èi3 m m 0 0 0 .., 0 en :::a 0 0 1:) 0 -4 "T1 C ....... Q) 3!: :!] C') Z CD (') 3!: C en 0 -4 -Š CD m » C') c: z Q) 0 z -4 c ::;, ë5: c m » z m ï -4 3!: Q) ::0 !=? -< tø ..... ..... -< m Õ· <= - m C') - ~ ::;, 0 co » 0 ::;- - :::a š: 0 ::0 0 3 0 0 - š: c:: CD - - ëÐ CD en ::;, CD en Õ' .., I 0- N 0 § c:: 0 <:) CD ~ ~ ~ 0 z <:) Q) ..... 0 m ..... ~ 0 ::E C/) C/) :::a , o' 01 (,J ::;, ~ en ..... <:) ë;I , " 01 0) (') -§ ~ ::;,- <:) ::;, CO <:) 0 ãJ <:) õ" , 01 CO 0- <:) CD <:) ãr Q) en Q) ::;, 0- æ: èi3 (') õ" ::;,- CD (') !=l- Q) ..... õ· ::;, '-' AGENDA REQUEST ¡·..tM NO. c-sA. DATE: July 18, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Administration Doug Anderson County Administrator SUBJECT: Restudy Coordination Committee BACKGROUND: Commissioner Coward has received notice that his appointee will need to resign from the Restudy Coordination Committee. Commissioner Coward wishes to appoint Debbie Crouse to this Committee. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board ratify Commissioner Coward's appointment of Debbie Crouse to serve on the Restudy Coordination Committee. [X] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CE: COMMISSION ACTION: Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 P.Ol Jun-29-00 09:54A a. 9. 10. 11, 'W ...." Sf.l.ucie County Board of County Commissioners Application for Serv;"9 on County Boards and Committees Thank you for applying fOf- a position on one of St. Lucie County's many advisory boards and committee~ The minimum ('equirements for committee membership are: ~Must be a County resident .,. Must not be related to Qi' other committee member. County Commissioner or County employee Învolved with the committee of interest .... Must not be employed by 'the same btlsiness entity as other committee members. lit Must not serve on more than 2 County committee$ Note: Some committees have additiotlal 'equirements, please inquire when submitting this application. In addition, service on committees with planning, zoning or hatura' resources re!;ponsibilitie.s may require disclosure of 'financial interests. Please complete the following information: 1. 2. 3. PLEASE INDICATE THE COMMTTTËË(S) YOU ARE INTERESTED IN. SEE THE REVERSE SID NAME;-D6-~~..t:L-.A. . C,.f(c;u.s.~ PHONE: '1~-oý.[O HOME ADDRESS: -:p.o· '150}(. I ~ a~V1 . F'·Pf~ -fi-. I.{. '1'1 -;¿d-tt~ WHICH COMMISSION DISTRICT DO YOU LIVE IN? ---þlc;Trt.. tC.T au SINE 5 51 occur A nON ÅÞf¥,.ttJ\ Srf..A..ìt'> R 1.. ì F ä (....t;J é' Mt:.~ ìcA-t.,$ £R... ::r:::NC... BUSINESS ADDRESS; ~ '\'2- r.. f"1\.¡"bVJ ~ RD , EI::::eì~ _~ ft.·atfqlt PHONE:~ ç-'·04-\ ~ BRIEF RESUME OF ËOUCATtON & EXPERIENCE:(plea$e attach /"uLllTle) e:l)("c. - ~¡E..,~ \ "i.- L.HJ £ "^ ~ Î çA--L. C; UZ. :r;:N::.. l q IS ~ _~~u~~c.- f~'i:Sì\':)t:;.) q ~ I) ~ (Y\ 'êIJ'r1'+.L . tZLfo R...rì N°-I c.. N!. u. ~ri I\jG . DO YOU CURRENTLY SERVE ON A COUNTY t.:OMMITTeE(S). IF SO, PLEASE LIST: c.. A- . C. . ~ L-. C. . ß . WHY DOYOU THIN/< YOU ARE QUALIFIED TO SERVE ON THE COMMIìTEE(S) INDICATED? Att~~~.€.. f ~jl.r-jNG- ()N A-U.. f'".E''HNG..5 ,' 'oJ~. Cøt).tVrtf ~ _ "" ~~~.~:- l.Wt)t~T'AN1:> ~_ èM-~r- ~~TS ~ T\t~.Ji. ~fS~i' . WOULö YOU CON5If;)ER SERVING ON ANOTHER BOAAD OiHER THAN iHE ONE(S) STATEO ASOVE?(Pl..ËASE 5PECrFY)-1?-L.,w.;N ¡tV G- 1-2t:> tJ tNG- COMMf:NT5:_¿;:: wo U. L~ ~~~ ~~\<ÅtJc.. o..l It- ~ tUJ Ul't\~ {~€" -ANI:> ~ 'Ff'i..L. -:r= ~U.L~. Bt. PI u.S G FU L M~ ~ ""Ð 1\-\ f.. R.E·S'f1,.( ò (; ,....\-\-t.,. ~-::..~ ~éW J:þ ~.:IftL_RES~~'b \V~CJL.D ~ì","W ,~ ~ B.el ..~·c.o t~'E~J>, ~ . DATE: 6/0 o-tJ APPLrCA N t.L REMAIN EFFECTIVe F R ONE YEAR ". Submit to: St. Lucie County Administrator's Office 2300 Virginia Ave.. Ft. Pierce.. FI. 34982 Phone: 462-1453 4. 5. 6. 7. - ~ AGENDA REQUEST I~ NO. C-SB DATE: July 18, 2000 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Administration Doug Anderson County Administrator SUBJECT: Contractor's Certification Board BACKGROUND: The appointment of Commissioner Lewis to the Contractor's Certification Board expires July, 2000. Commissioner Lewis received a letter from Craig Dunkelberger expressing his desire to be reappointed. Commissioner Lewis wishes to reappoint Craig Dunkelberger to this Board. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/ A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board ratify Commissioner Lewis' appointment of Craig Dunkelberger to serve on the Contractor's Certification Board. [XJ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Dou Cou COMMISSION ACTION: Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Other: Other: Originating Dept. Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 ., .~Øb/27/2000 14:02 5613439"'''''1 '-" DET-PSL PAGE 02 ..." [)~_ DUNKELBERGER ENGINEERING & TESTING, INC. .: -=r;, I G;;;¿~chnical. Materials Testing/Inspection. Environmental Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Board of COWlty Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 . ~ . / V" (I I V J n. ,,' ) 11'IC' tJ,/ Subject: Expressloll of IlIterest St. Lucie County Contractor ExamiaiDg Board Appomtment St. Lucie County. Florida Dear Commissioner Lewis: I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for appointing me to serve on the St. Lucie COWlty Contractor Examining Board. My two (2) year tenn on the Board has been enjoyable as well as fulfilling in the sense that it allowed me to contribute to the commUlÙty. Although my tenn is about to expire, I would be pleased to continue to serve on the board, and would ask that you consider me for reappointment. Again, it has been my privilege to serve as your appointee on the St. Lucie COW1ty Contractor Examining Board. Should you \-vish to speak with me regarding this matter, please feel fice to give me a call. Very truly yours. (it C::ilb«g<s, p Vice President CED/pg 8oo/slc cc: ~. Doug Anderson, County Administrator Mr. Ray Wazny, Director of Public W orles 523A NW. Entmprise Drive. Port St. Lucie. Flcrida 34986 Telephone (561) 343-971:7 . Fax (561) 343-9404 E.mail: c etpsIØbellsouth.net State of Florida Board 01 P",feuior.1 Engi"eers Autl'orization NO. 657(1 "' '-' AGENDA REQUEW ITEM NO. C-6 DATE: July 18, 2000 REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Mike Leeds Director, Leisure Services SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAIL. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: [ X ] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: C=",y '''o=oy, ty 11/' Originating DePt.~/(ï- Leisure Services Children's Environmental Learning Museum DEP Agreement No. M99004 - Boardwalks permission to Bid. St. Lucie County received a $219,000 grant to construct certain amenities at the Children's Environmental Museum, including boardwalks, bridges, dock and trails. Funds are available in 001243-7240-563000-7134. December 14, 1999 - Work authorization with Thomas Lucido & Associates approved for the design and permitting of boardwalks, docks and sampling piers. Staff recommends the Board approve the request to bid. DENIED Mgt. & Budget: Review and A Other: Finance: (Check for copy only, if applicable) M. Anderson, Administrator Purchasing: Other: · . ~ ¡ .. H I IIi -I II I I f I .J I . I .1. II~ J~! 11!1] iL~ I; ualjl I].! iltal ~4~> J~~' " ~ )? J !II . I . I J l l l ,.. i II hi ~I'" .. '4 i II! II! .. I h h I ". /.. I J ~ J t I rf¡ r .. H I IIi il It . I I . f ~ ....., I, II ., ~ - , ~ -0' '<I I ..... I I I I I I . I I' ¡ I! I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I' II JL ,IPtI J !Jø mt.. ulllr ill!J1 I~~~q I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I ¡ I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I II o<{-.J --.-.....- I . I . ...., J ... U I" il Uar ~I !~ I I r I h 111 11 "I I I """" ,-,.L ,IPp I II!ltl ~i¡11 luUr I! ¡UHI J... . . .1 N ~. [11 I .. .. G> r Iii" ~I . I !II I &1 J , .1 ~ ! I . I I at I !. i I I . I J __I. I I I I! I ~! I I I hi J IJ . I I I Ïl-, I I I ~~> I I ~? I I I I I . I 01 # ., . Ir (D . (D II " II 1 =(D 10 JI I I -~ '- "'i , .L . l 1- ê I W¡I r .. -}- II ~I ) U UI( ,~ ~ ~ iJ .I, ~ )10'1 ,110.11 I ..-FwBl I' ! ¡ ~Ìi.. !U ~ 111111 111 , ~I Î!iut -~ ~~~ fi, v ~ .... . ~.. ~. ~ I Iii D IJ þ 1 ~ II . I ~ 11 ~ I 01 II HI I ~ ~ n I ~I! ~ I \ 1~! J l. "-' .... JJ J ].1 ~~> >'? [ þ F !II I c Þ F ~ J (!} ,1= t [ þ .. L r-. ~ C P I [ þ J I , I , [ ] t = I D/ . C ~ I ~.~ h --.-- -.,. w- I I~U ¡ ¡; [.J ~ ! . I.. J I . I ¡ - . ! !II ~ I. J I) .L Fit 11'1 I J ]11 en mill e =8 . !i., , i ~~> It) . utllr Ir rr) (1 n8 ~. ~ !!iHt J... . J . .. . - . ~. 0 ~j ...... II o · · o ..- ............ ..... . ~j ...... ...... --'- . '-, , ...... ....... ......... .................... .. ........ .................,....._......"'.., .....,"'.........L...oL.... ...........V.......L... ~v"'" W' ...." ~ iF CORNETT. GOOGE, Ross & EARLE. P .A. JANe: !, CORNETT HOWARD E, GOOGE DE80RAH L ROSS DA.VID B L"-"LE ELIZABETH F' FJUNAN /!{;l f"/~.~~T U:'::.;CE~C)!.,A .s--J" f;":F-ST FU_~')C)R R~\/CF~ (\.:oj< C~:ENTER ':;-;'L.;,'\ft!" FL.(ìF'¡tJA. :34n94 ~"-'1!\:\ ,¡{".¡(:; ;\.D~}R[S~,~ r-'C~~-;-!- CJF(¡CE í3Ct;': 66 STUAF<T, j-LC;i~¡D!-\ 3499~5 CHARLES W SINGER OF COUNSEL '~56! ; 26t'..2!;I;:-?O F/--'.X {~\61; 286·2996 July 17, 2000 Via facsimile 1-561-462-1581 St. Lucie County, Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Ave. Fort Pierce, FL 34952 Re: Savanna Club Property Owners' Association, Inco's objection to: Resolution No. 00-199/Dollom, Inc., - Consider staff recommendation to approve resolution granting Major Site Plan Approval for the Savanna Club Apartments. Dear Commissioners: Our firm has the pleasure of representing Savanna Club Property Owners' Association, Inc., the homeowners association that manages and maintains the community commonly known as the Savanna Club Development of Regional Impact, which is located immediately east of the proposed apartment complex site. The Savanna Club DRI is a residential community which currently consists of over 1,000 homes and 1.800 residents. When built out it will consist of approximately 2,200 homes and 4,000 residents. Contrary to Staff's memorandum, the Savanna Club is a community of manufactured homes that are well landscaped and maintained - it is not a mobile home park. As expressed to the Commission when this proposed project first came before you in September, 1999. the residents of the Savanna Club DRI have several concerns about the proposed project and how it will impact both their homes and their quality of life. Although I will be appearing before you at the Commission meeting scheduled for July 18, 2000, I thought it might be helpful to outline my clients' concerns in advance. They are as follows: 1. Traffic Impact: The residents of the Savanna Club DRI are concerned about the impact that the proposed project will have on the traffic flow of Savanna Club Boulevard. The Savanna Club DRI is located to the east of the proposed project on Savanna Club Blvd., and will therefore necessarily be impacted by any additional development between it and U.S. Highway #1. ;/ ...., ...., July 17, 2000 Page Two The original traffic study presented to the Commission in 1999 studied the traffic under the assumption that the Lennard Road extension between Savanna Club Blvd.. and Port St. Lucie High School would be opened imminently. Staffs report states that the analysis has been properly revised to reflect that the extension will not be opened anytime in the near future. however we still have several unanswered questions: A. Was the build out of the Savanna Club DRI accounted for (remember it is only 50% built out)? B. We have been informed that the north east corner of Savanna Club Blvd., and US Highway #1 has been approved for development of a HESS gas station and convenience store. Access to this parcel from the north would require travelers to make a left from U.S. #1 onto Savanna Club Blvd., and another left across Savanna Club Blvd., into the gas station. Certainly additional traffic on Savanna Club Blvd., from the proposed development will create a safety hazard. Why wasn't this development accounted for in the traffic study. If the traffic study is based upon incomplete data, how can it be relied upon by the County? C. Staffs report states that Savanna Club Blvd.. is a two lane facility with a dedicated bike lane. When traffic conditions are deemed appropriate, this facility can be re-striped into a 4 lane facility. The residents of the Savanna DRI were promised that Savanna Club Blvd., would remain a 2 lane facility with bike paths when it donated the road to the County in 1986. In his March 16. 1999 letter attached to Staffs report, Assistant Director of Community Development, Dennis Murphy. indicated that Savanna Club Blvd., would not be widened at anytime in the near future. so why was the potential for widening it referenced in Staffs report? Will the residents of Savanna Club DRI being losing their bike paths sooner rather than later? 2. Savanna Club Boulevard landscaping: When Savanna Club Boulevard from South US #1 to Lennard Road was donated to the County for use as a public roadway in 1986, the Savanna Club DRI agreed to maintain the liner landscaping along this corridor. It is inherently unfair that the Savanna Club DRI should continue to be responsible for landscaping the portion of the corridor located west of its utility site if the proposed apartments are permitted to be constructed. Thus, instead of requiring the Savanna Club DRI to "renegotiate" its responsibility for landscaping Savanna Club Blvd.. in the future. we would request that any approval of the proposed project include a condition requiring that the developer be responsible for the liner landscaping on Savanna Club Blvd.. from US #1 to the east property line of the project. , '-' ..., July 17, 2000 Page Three 3. Environmental Impact: As Commissioner Coward pointed out when this matter came before the Commission in 1999, the proposed project site is home to gopher tortoises which are endangered species and several acres of protected wetlands. Although the plan submitted by the developer calls for off site mitigation. the residents of Savanna Club DRI are not convinced that the beauty of the property will be maintained or that the gopher tortoises will be properly protected. Due to the time constraints placed upon submitting this letter to you, we have not had the opportunity to review the environmental study performed by the developer, but we would respectfully request that the Commission look at this issue carefully. Please recall that in its 1999 submission the developer incorrectly represented to the Commission that there were no endangered species located on the site. 4. Buffering: The developer proposes to construct an eight foot high opaque wood fence along the north and east property line of the proposed project in order to "buffer" the residential units from the proposed apartment complex. The residents of the Savanna Club DRJ object to this fence for several reasons: A. The wood fence will not protect the residents of the Savanna Club DRI in the event a "controlled burn" gets out of control. B. The wood fence will decay and rot if not properly maintained. Thus is the proposed project is approved. the residents of the Savanna Club DRI respectfully request that any such approval be conditioned upon the construction of a concrete wall rather than a wood fence between the apartment complex and the Savanna Club DR/. We thank you for your time and attention to these issues. and we look forward to discussing them as well as others with you at the July 18. 2000 Commission meeting. ~. Sinc!!rely.. ~; /·1 / /) \--~ /.. / ,._--~./,AÓ \ ./ <t.. ·Ross. Esquire DLRlnth cc: client w ..., AGBNDA REOUEST ITEM NO. en. DATE: July 18, 2000 CONSENT X REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: [ x ] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: Originating Dept.: Community Development/Tourism Division ~£~ R. J. Gibson Advertising Invoices R. J. Gibson, Inc. has been contracted to provide advertising services for the St. Lucie County Tourist Development Council. The invoices with all back up included in the amount of $26,641.13 for April represents cost for the following: $20,853.03 5,128.04 Media Placement Ad production and mechanical art work for brochure cover sheets, visitor guide revision for mechanical, creative and layout Fees Expenses $ 503.75 $ 156.31 Request approval for payment on the invoices for the month of April in the amount of $26,641.13. The Tourist Development Council and Staff recommend Board approval to pay the attached invoices. DENIED Coordination/Siqnatures Management & Budget: Purchasing: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) FORJIS\AGJlRBQ w ....., Some Thoughts About Why Approval Of The Savanna Apartments Should Not Be Approved In Its Present Form There are at least three basic problems that residents of Savanna Club see with the project: I. Traffic 2. Final Route For Lennard Road 3. History Of This Developer In St. Lucie County Along with those problems we are also concerned that this entire project will be in close proximity to an existing sewage treatment plant. There are bound to be complaints rrom renters rrom time to time about the natural odors emanating rrom the retention ponds and I'm sure that the complaints will not call them natural odors. We note that in Martin County, a relatively new golf course is trying to eliminate preexisting pig farms because of, among other things, their smell. 1. Traffic In the June 4, 2000 St. Lucie News, Sam Poole, a lawyer representing the apartment complex developer, is quoted as saying, a traffic analysis shows that Savanna Club Boulevard can handle the additional cars that will be driving in and out of the complex, but he acknowledged that there would be a noticeable increase in traffic. Since I have not seen the analysis, I can only wonder if it considered any increase in traffic attributable to the gasoline station already approved at the comer of Route 1, additional homes at Lake Lucie, the completion of Lennard Road in this area or the approximately 1,300 additional homes approved to be built within Savanna Club. At aprevious County Commission meeting an apartment complex proponent said that Savanna Club Boulevard is wide enough to provide two lanes of traffic each direction. That would of course eliminate the existing bicycle paths. Bicycle paths are an asset to St. Lucie County and even exist along Route 1. They shouldn't be eliminated. Another statement attributed to Mr. Poole in the News article is that: Emergency evacuation should not be a problem because the eastbound lane of Savanna Club Boulevard could be used as a second exit in the event of a hurricane or other disaster. Let's assume that a disaster occurs and we use Mr. Poole's idea about the eastbound lane. How do emergency vehicles go eastbound to combat the emergency problem? 2. The Final Route For Lennard Road Present plans for Lennard Road show that it separates a significant portion of Savanna Club rrom the major portion of Savanna Club which includes all of our amenity areas. None of us here tonight are responsible for that horrible decision, but we are stuck with it. Rerouting Lennard Road around the western most portion of Savanna Club housing might well be accomplished having Lennard Road follow the outer contour of this section of houses, continue through some Savanna Club property near our sewer plant, cross Savanna Club Boulevard, continue through a portion of the Savanna Apartment property, now designated as a buffer area, and the return to the previous Lennard Road route. Disadvantages 1. More costs - added distance 2. Puts more curves into Lennard Road Page 1 of3 -., ...., 3. Might need to acquire additional property for the right of way Advantages I. It would keep additional traffic out of an adult community 2. Makes the area much more safe because Savanna Club walkers, bicycle riders and golf carts away ITom a busy county intersection 3. A traffic light might not be required 4. The gratitude of all Savanna Club residents Early Sunday morning, it dawned on me that while I've just begged you to find some way to correct the poor conditions approved for Savanna Club about two decades ago, we are talking about approving the Savanna Apartments, another split community. If the apartment's amenity area is on only one side of the road, crossing Savanna Club Boulevard with toddlers may well be a more dangerous condition than what is presently expected at Savanna Club. History A wise person once said that if we don't learn ITom history, we are doomed to repeat it. Another local government entity was shocked to find out that an approved market-based housing project subsequently was converted to low income housing. Again, in the News article Mr. Poole is quoted as saying ''There are no plans for this to be anything other than market-rate housing." While sitting in this chamber we heard another Dollom Associates representative tell us that he did not see any turtles on that property. Although the statement may have been true, we all know how much value there was in it. If this is to be a market-rate apartment complex, then there should be no problem with incorporating a statement in the development order or other enforceable agreement between St. Lucie County and the developer that this will never be subsidized housing. ''Mr. Dollom", the head of Doll om Associates, Michael Mollod, was in charge of Savanna Club Corporation here in St. Lucie County for about two and a half years. There were two high profile requirements of the Savanna Club project, a 20,000 square foot hurricane shelter was to be provided by Savanna Club Corporation to St. Lucie County when the 650th home in Savanna Club was energized and the Surface Water Management System at Savanna Club was to meet the requirements of the South Florida Water Management Authority that were in effect ignored by Savanna Club Corporation and therefore Mr. Mollod. The hurricane shelter was never provided by Savanna Club Corporation. It was left up to the present developer, Community Savanna Club Joint Venture, to provide the shelter and because of that they lost considerable time in being able to sell homes. According to a recent evaluations of the Surface Water Management System by Culpepper & Terpening and John Robbins the evaluations not only show that the system clearly does not meet the requirements, but that the system was not properly constructed. However, Savanna Club Corporation has continued to issue yearly reports to South Florida Water Management District that indicate compliance with requirements. One has to wonder why a corporation, namely Savanna Club Corporation, would continue to keep the construction permit for the Surface Water Management System for the Page 2 of3 w ...,; Savanna Club property for years after they sold the property to Community Savanna Club Joint Venture. The last two paragraphs lead me to ask a question. If you were to buy some furniture and were treated badly by the merchant, would you go back to the same store when you needed more furniture? Secondly, if you were forced to deal with that merchant again, because he was the only dealer in your area for the pieces you want, wouldn't you attempt to dot all the "i"s and cross all the "t"s in an iron-clad contract? Please only give approval for this apartment complex when there are reasonable safeguards in place for St. Lucie County. I have looked at your meeting schedule for this month and noted the large number of budget workshops. Our budget meetings at Savanna Club are difficult enough and are not complicated by the loss of ratables that you have had. We need more ratables in this county, but we must also be cautious when we have some history to ponder. Thank: you for your attention and consideration of my comments on this important matter. To repeat - traffic patterns if not attended to now, may well be very costly to St. Lucie County in the future. The location of Lennard Road with respect to Savanna Club has great safety implications. Lastly, careful development order descriptions along with check points and penalties may be the only way to protect St. Lucie County rrom future unnecessary expenses. /j~c~~ George Emo Savanna Club Property Owners Association President Attachments: 1. Map showing a possible Lennard Road route around Savanna Club 2. Page 4 of the Becker & Poliakoff, P.A. July 2000 Community Up-Date (It illustrates that safety should be a real concern for all parties) Page 3 of3 / / -( .~ ~ .~ k ~ u C) :/ '" , .". I ! i :.i~ZI . CD " \:) "I 'i'~ ~\ , CD I , .Q +,-,. ~ CDi ) ~ <.JJ ~ <¡ \~ ~ I~ h ,1 ~ II - ,/ ~N 1 VJ I ~ il. U t .-.. r- tï\ ~~ ~~ ~~ \Jb' ~~ "I ......-- S I tV c..€.. l-E3-¡U¡JÆfiÞ RD, 1.5 10 13 £.. ON/- Y ,:¿ M¡v~ W IP&í'# E. ROAI:> W()U'-D II. øe... fì:S' w / 1> ¡¿ ~AS SlIowAJ ..... ~ " :I ; ß ¡}T If/€- CU,(II/£5 Mft I W£./.-L ,8E- 1-1E.;;> DlfAsï¡ A,.u]) Tflke.. UP MO/(E.. fRoPE3.~ TJ en n Q) - CD 'IJ o ,0 lJol(íH- ., O"O~'09"E '" ~ ~ I~ '. - ".~ ~/"---- -.--------- .... ~- ,/- ~ ~ - - ./'----------- ~-- _.--- --1; ~. :E Ø) - ct> ~ - - :!~ - - . ~ .. r. ('III/III/lilli/.\' I 1'-/)ull' CÄS·INO"IS ';''¡ µ"/tDEFIN.... ."E YOUR iiARAS8MENT POLICY A r~PE3ntopinion,from the ,Eleventh Circuit rtpf,~ppeal underscores the importance havil1g~.~. defiped ,and clear policy with a'1t~,;~l:}xuarharassment, as well as a ~ar, procedure delineated for employee "*:¡:",~omplaints.ln the case of Madry and Holden 11.; Publix Supermarkets, Inc., the Eleventh .!, Gircuit ruled in favor of Publix. The employees egElg:,~fu"assment by their immediate enti~ar;.\:the store manager. for the store ¡:Úch':they- worked. However, the lciyeês, ,did nót' comply' with the sexual. ,;,;>,,¡:irasšrríent policY implemented . and 'f,.~publishedto. all employees by Publix. The ¢,fl?plicy:clearly stated that Publix would not ;.Lrperm~ hara~sment of, this type and identified ;f,,;;;-;~ least three people, only one of whom was the immediate supervisor in the store, to , born~:}:Jggr.ieved employees could pursue ,E:'!ir compl~ints.!. The· appellate court held ~~t P~bli~"had de"1.onstrated reasonable c:~l"etoprevent sexual harassment. by j:lf()mulgating a policy and setting up multiple :;~'~lt,,~"enues fo~ the pursuit of complaints and "!;¡~~at the employees had failed to take ,,~\~.;ã~ntageof.the 'avenues available to them 7,i{tpiraise their complaints. Therefore, the , ,Ê~~\appeal court affirmed a summary judgment . which had been entered by the trial court. . ,~or t~o~e. associations that have multiple èmploye.~~, this case underscores the ImportalJcè', of drafting and disseminating a cl,ear ~~d comprehensive policy with regard 'sexual, ha.rassment and, for that matter, ,er forms of harassment as regards 'playees. , ASSOCIATION RESPONSIBLE FORINJURY WHEN RULES CREATE A DANGER TO THE RESIDENTS Karen Gross sued her, mobile home park ~9rrElownE:'!rs' associati0Qfor aQ9pting a rúl.e "which restricted childr.en frcimusing the . recreational facilities on the north section of the park, thèreby requiring the children to c:ross a busy publicstr,eet to'reach the recr;EJational facilities on' i9.~. 5Out~ side of the i ..'p~~K,,~.l-iel",son was hit b¥8 cal"~en trying Jto,rrtumhome tr0mt;heisouthSicJ.~ fac!lities. Ms.' Gross claimed thåtthe associåtion,'as a matter of law. owed a legal duty of care to her' and her children and was negligent for adopting the rule in light of the foreseeable danger of having to cross a busy and inadequately lit street., . The trial court di~l11issed the personal.illjury .rase, ruling 'that the 'defendants had no legal' duty of care in the matter. .. ,~. ¡¡. \. ''"''~'" i '"The Fourth DistrictCourt of Appeal. ill the case of Gross et al v. Sand and Sea' Homeowners Association, at al,. [Case No.. 4D~g..107E1],flJl~don. f\~ril 19. ,2OCXJ that thëi'Association'did have a·legal duty of carè: and was negligent in ado :lting th.e restrictions because it did not take jnto account the danger for children crossing the streeJt. The case was remanded to the trial court for further action. The moral of the story is: rule-making should be a careful and considered process, and all relevant issues should be part of the final crafting of the rule language. A reasonable concern for safety is clearly an important part of the process. '--' THE INFORMATION SET FORTH IN THIS BULLETIN IS GENERAL AND SUMMARY IN NATURE AND IS NOT INTENDED AS SPECIFIC LEGAL ADVICE APPLICABLE TO YOUR ASSOCIATION, IF YOU HAVE QUESTIONS REGARDING THE CONTENTS OF THIS RELEASE AS IT APPLIES TO YOUR SITUATION. PLEASE CONTACT THE ASSOCIATION ATTORNEY RESPONSIBLE FOR YOUR FILE. IN ADDITION, WE WISH TO REAFFIRM THE FACT THAT THE PRINCIPLES OF LAW CITED HEREIN ARE SUBJECT TO CHANGE FROM TIME TO TIME. , .,.., '...t AGBNDA RBQtJBST ITEM NO. C7B DATE: July 18, 2000 CONSENT X REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Communi tv Development/Tourism Division .g~ SUBJECT: R. J. Gibson Advertising Invoices BACKGROUND: R. J. Gibson, Inc. has been contracted to provide advertising services for the St. Lucie County Tourist Development Council. The invoices with all back up included in the amount of $6,479.20 for May represents cost for the following: $3,634.00 2,005.20 840.00 Media Placement Visitor Guide Revision Ad production Request approval for payment on the invoices for the month of May in the amount of $6,479.20. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: The Tourist Development Council and Staff recommend Board approval to pay the attached invoices. [ X ] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: Coordination/Siqnatures County Attorney: Management & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept.: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) rORXS\AGHRBQ · '-Agenda Request .., Item Number Date: t-~-C- July 18, 2000 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ X ] [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ To: Board of County Commissioners Presented By 4-'2~~ Com. Development Director Submitted By: Community Development Director SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: South A-1-A Multi-Use Path no Permission to Advertise As the Board is aware, the County has for the past several months been working on the designs for the South A-1-A Multi- Use Path, also known as the Indian River Lagoon Trace. This path will run along State Road A-1-A from the point were the existing sidewalk ends in front of the Ocean Towers Condominium project to the entrance into the Ocean Village Condominium in Ft. Pierce. This project has been divided into three (3) phases for the purpose of construction. The first phase will be from the end of the existing sidewalk at Ocean Towers, north to the entrance into the Walton Rocks Beach Site. Phase 1/ will run from the entrance with Ocean Village south to the Blind Creek Recreation Site. The final phase, will connect these two segments. This particular phasing plan is necessary because of the complexities /cost associated with connecting this path through the FPL property along State Road A-1-A. As of this date, the Phase I construction plans are nearing final completion. We have applied for, but not yet received, construction permits from the South Florida Water Management District and the Florida Department Of Transportation. We expect those approvals to be forthcoming in the next few weeks. The schedule for this project is as follows: Advertise for bids Pre-Bid meeting with interested proposers Bid opening July 28, 2000 August 16, 2000 August 30, 2000 Expected award date Expected construction start date September/October 2000 November/December 2000 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funding is available in 101006-4116-56300-400 and will be transferred to 101006-4116-56300- 4901 as soon as authorization to advertise is granted. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize permission to advertise this project for bids and to further authorize the Management and Budget Department of transfer the appropriate funds from Road Impact Fee Zone 5 into the project reserve accounts for this construction project. The estimated construction budget for this first phase is just under $700,000. County Attorney Æ- Originating Dept.: Finance: Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: CURRENCE: COMMISSION ACTION: QO APPROVED c=J DENIED c=J OTHER ouglas M. Anderson County Administrator Purchasing: Other: (AGEND119) ..... .~ ..." COMMISSION REVIEW: July 18, 2000 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director DATE: July 11, 2000 SUBJECT South A-1-A Multi-Use Path --- Permission to Advertise As the Board is aware, the County has for the past several months been working on the designs for the South A-1-A Multi- Use Path, also known as the Indian River Lagoon Trace. This path will run along State Road A-1-A from the point were the existing sidewalk ends in front of the Ocean Towers Condominium project to the entrance into the Ocean Village Condominium in Ft. Pierce. This project has been divided into three (3) phases for the purpose of construction. The first phase will be from the end of the existing sidewalk at Ocean Towers, north to the entrance into the Walton Rocks Beach Site. Phase II will run from the entrance with Ocean Village south to the Blind Creek Recreation Site. The final phase, will connect these two segments. This particular phasing plan is necessary because of the complexities /cost associated with connecting this path through the FPL property along State Road A-1-A. As of this date, the Phase I construction plans are nearing final completion. We have applied for, but not yet received, construction permits from the South Florida Water Management District and the Florida Department Of Transportation. We expect those approvals to be forthcoming in the next few weeks. At this time staff is requesting that the Board authorize permission to advertise this project for bids and to further authorize the Management and Budget Department of transfer the appropriate funds from Road Impact Fee Zone 5 into the project reserve accounts for this construction project. The estimated construction budget for this first phase is just under $700,000. The schedule for this project is as follows: Advertise for bids Pre-Bid meeting with interested proposers Bid opening July 28, 2000 August 16,2000 August 30, 2000 Expected award date Expected construction start date September/October 2000 November/December 2000 If you have any questions, please let me know. ·ed:·¿LM lia Shewchuk, AICP ommunity Development Director JSI SRA1A1(a84) cc: County Administrator County Attorney Purchasing Director Public Works Director County Engineer