Press Alt + R to read the document text or Alt + P to download or print.
This document contains no pages.
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2005
" ,
~
~
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
Agenda
Friday, December 16,2005
7:30 a.m., Conference Room # 3
St. Lucie County Roger E. Poitras Administration Annex
Convene meeting
Roll Call, announcements
Minutes
1.
,¡Jr ¡1
1/ //IJ .,oS /a.J
t;F f'I tr~~t7 r ~
Update on Implementation of Recommendations for Criminal ~
Justice Study. (Mark Godwin)
2. Hurricane Recovery Update. (Faye Outlaw)
3. Funding for Clerk of Court Building. (Doug Anderson)
4. Funding Special Needs Shelter. (Doug Anderson)
5. Update status of decision packages for January 2006 Strategic
Planning Session. (Doug Anderson)
--
Adjournment
Next CBC meeting: January 20,2006
~~©pnW7~ 1m
. ,,~' 1 r 2~'" l~
..L~.. .' !,.;ij~
CO. ADMIN. OFFICE
Draft
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: November 18, 2005
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:35 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Lillie Miller, Ron Parrish, William "Bill"Casey, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick, Randy Ezell, Carl
Hensley and Steven Messer.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Jay L. Mc Bee, Toby Philpart, Debbie Hawley, Edward Lounds, Troy Ingersoll and Linda
Bartz.
OTHERS PRESENT: Dr. Kalmanoff, Pat Bradley, Toby Long, Marie Gouin and Doug Anderson.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
CBC members got news at this meeting that Jacquelene Burke notified staff of her decision to resign to the
CBC. Carl Hensley introduced Randy Ezell to committee members; he is the Clerk of Court new appointee
to this committee.
MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the August 19,2005 meeting, Ron moved for approval
and Bill seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and the motion passed.
Space Needs Study
Staff is working on planning the County's space needs for the next 15 years.
Doug introduced Dr. Kalmanoff, from the University of California Berkeley and the Institute for Law and
Policy Planning (ILPP), who previously made the criminal justice study for the County, which has been
recommended by Mark Godwin to be implemented to speed up the processing of pending cases and,
consequently, reduce the jail population. Now he has been hired to perform a space study for all county
facilities.
Doug listed a number of projects that staff is considering to propose to the BOCC to develop (e.g.: maybe build
a campus for the County Administration building), for which this study will surely prove to be an asset.
Dr. Kalmanoff began his presentation by stating that based on past experience with other counties and on
the fact that this is one of the fastest growing - if not the fastest - counties in the Country, it's hard to believe
that we count with enough funds to build all the necessary infrastructure today, let alone in the future.
The way building spaces has happened historically - the norm -, not just in this governmental entity, but_
everywhere, is in response to demands from the most "powerful" department heads and just based on who
complains the most for their space needs, within scarce resources in a tight environment - competing for it;
not on an accurate study of how the departments operate and interact with the public, or other
facilities/ departments.
The result is that management ends up building spaces without having time to think about economies (e.g.:
Could these two departments share a building? Could I be out in the country where it would be cheaper to
build and operate? Is an industrial facility really needed downtown, having trucks come in and out of small
streets, or would it be sufficient to just have a small satellite office at the main office and operate from a
facility in the outskirts?).
He also pointed out the smallest cost is usually the at the beginning of the investment (planning, capital cost
of building/ acquiring the facility), the greater one is the operating cost within the following twenty years. If
it is planned correctly, it saves money in the long run (Usually, costs are much less about the building and
much more about the way it works: how or where it is built - did it cover the true needs or did it create new
and unnecessary expenses). He also gave a few more examples of ways the operating costs could
increase/decrease based on the decisions made at the time of planning spaces, and stated this is why it is
so important to create a framework at the planning phase, stick to it and review it periodically, to get the best
results. The costs saved by just one of these decisions made right, may cover the cost of the entire study.
Dr. Kalmanoff proceeded to explain the methodology of how the study is performed. First, they analyze how
each of the entities that conform the County government has grown and don't make the immediate
assumption that they will expand at the same rate, but determine what factors have influenced the need for
more space or resources.
Based on interviews with the Department Heads, historic data and other factors, such as population and/or
demographics, the data base is compiled, different aspects are analyzed (each department independently) and
recommendations are made in terms of projected size and locations to cover the future needs for resources
and, consequently, space.
Dr. Kalmanoff introduced Pat Bradley, who is heading the team and she explained they are at the initial
stage, working with the departments and elected constitutional officers getting a feel of what is going on in
the County.
Bill Casey inquired in what way does this study differ from a "wish list" from the each of the department
heads and stay true to actual future needs.
Pat Bradley stated the study takes into account several factors, not just what the department heads estimate
they will need. Besides this projection they perform several independent projections for staffing and she
explained some of the different factors they may consider, depending on the department's function.
Dr. Kalmanoffs concluded that, for now, they had just attended to this meeting to report they have started
the process and his team will come back to this committee to report their findings, to submit it to their
consideration and request their input, so that the CBC members and staff can brainstorm for possible
solutions (to think of ways to allocate funds, phase implementation, etc.). He added there will be several
drafts before a final report is issued and then, they also need to be humble, because these kind of projections
inevitably grow obsolete with embarrassing speed; therefore will need to be reviewed and updated along those
next fifteen years.
Stratee:ic Plannine: Session
Doug explained the way the Strategic Planning Session (SPS) is organized this year (3 sections)and stated it
is one of the most important SPS put together in recent years, because it will affect the next ten years. The
Commissioners have also given staff their input on the proposed agenda.
The topics that have been proposed by the different Department Heads have come down to the following:
Topic 1: Should the county adopt 1/2 cents sales tax for specific projects, for how many years? This would
have to go before the public as a referendum. Should it be voted yes, the County's Financial Advisor
projected the estimated revenue, over the next 20 years (Approx. 200,000,000). Part of the money would be
borrowed and part of the money would be used "as pay a you go" (It would pay for roads). This topic ties in
with number 2.
Topic 2: Roadway Funding Needs. Some of the critical projects are widening some sections of Midway, and
Kings Highway.
Topic 3: Should the County negotiate donations of land in West county for additional regional parks? (They
may be also needed for other services, such as libraries). Where will we stand twenty years from now and
should we set aside land for the different County Services provided today withing the current service
boundaries? Land is going up in price rapidly and it may be necessary to accept donations today to have
county owned land in strategic locations for when the service boundaries expand.
Topic 4: Should we increase MSTU for stormwater? This was developed in 1997 and have not increased it
over the years (it's a millage rate) and both cities have increased theirs dramatically.
Topic 5: Should the County estimate a growth fee for the unincorporated area to be paid by the developer for
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
November 18, 2005
page 2
items not covered by impact fees? This fee cannot be mandated without State Legislation and at this time,
it is not supported at the State level, to impose such fee (However, it could be voluntary).
Staff is studying the possibility to implement, in lieu of a growth fee, a different procedure to collect the
impact fees and Doug gave as an example, the developments around Kings Highway: staff is ofthe opinion,
based on studies received, that the road impact fee is artificially low. They have made calculations of what
it should be and they have been in conversations with every developer in that area so that they agree to pay
the road impact fees upon the final plan approval, at the level they should be at the time. This money will
go towards the Kings Highway area. But, if there was a growth fee, it would be implemented to also fund
other very much needed services, such as law enforcement officers, personnel for regional parks and so on.
This is why staff wants to ask the BOCC if they want to pursue this matter.
Topic 6: Could the County Create a Kings Highway Community Redevelopment Area (CRA)? To determine
if this is possible, several studies would have to be carried out, to determine if the area qualifies to be a CRA
or not. Doug explained that when a CRA is established, any property value taxes that are collected at the
moment of the creation continues to go to the governing jurisdiction, but any increases have to be redirected
to benefit directly within the boundaries of the CRA.
Topic 7: Could the County create a CRA for Midway road corridor from US1 to Turnpike? This question will
be modified to state to consider the possibility to establish a CRA from US1 to SR70.
Pat Ferrick stated the residents of White City are circulating petitions to oppose the creation of a CRA within
their limits. Property owners disagree with the way the term of the CRA would affect them. Copies of the
statutes were handed out at the meeting for CBC members information. There was some discussion on this
matter and members agreed a study should still be performed to determine if it qualifies and determine its
boundaries.
Topic 8: Impact fee for emergency shelters? This item was removed from the original list because, after some
discussion, staff determined that if the schools will be used as emergency shelters and a special needs shelter
will be built, it is not necessary to build more buildings just for that specific use. Therefore there is no need
to impose one more fee to the residents.
Topic 9: Essential Maintenance Projects. Roger Shinn, Central Services Director, is putting together this list.
Topic 10: Funding space needs. The importance of this item was discussed at the beginning of this meeting.
Topic 11: Where should the new EOC be located? It will be discussed at the 911 Board of Governors
December 1, 2005. They will make a recommendations and the BOCC needs to make the final decision on
this matter (Initially, it was considered the Fairgrounds would be the best location for the EOC - Staff will
update committee members on this matter as soon as possible locations are determined).
Topic 12: Should the County reinstate indigent health care funding? This may require setting up a taxing
district, which would include this item and a trauma center.
Topic 13: Where should the historical village be located? This concept is growing and there is a lot of interest
from several community residents, who have not only offered to donate land, but also buildings and funds
for this project.
Doug also went over a summary of these topics handed out at the meeting and stated a consultant has been
hired (Mr. H. Marlowe) to help plan and coordinate them in the best way possible (for details, please refer to
the handout).
Staff encouraged committee members to make plans to attend this SPS, to will be held in Panther Woods on
January 30 and 31 and to continue to give their input towards the preparation of the topics to be discussed
in the coming weeks.
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
November 18,2005
page 3
Other issues
New procedures for Public HearinQs. Doug informed CBC members that staff will request the BOCC to
consider establishing some added rules to the ones already in place for the Public Hearings, such as the time
the public comment time allotted to every person that requests to speak, signing up to speak (even if it is
during the meeting) and other rules that would allow a better management of the time the BOCC meetings
last (recent meetings have gone for well over six hours).
Old business
Carl inquired about a few issues that have been ongoing these last months and not resolved:
FEMA reimbursement: we have got some money back. Faye will make a (short) presentation on the status
of Frances, Jeanne and Wilma hurricanes at the next meeting.
Conflict with the City of Port St. Lucie in regards of collection of impact fees: the situation has not changed.
They refuse to do so.
Funding for the Research and Education Park: it is in our Legislative Request and the Legislative Delegation
will push for it.
Propertu Taxes
There was some discussion over the fact that it is the public perception that the millage rates have stayed
almost the same, property values have increase in some instances up to 300% in the last two or three years
and, therefore, the money collected has increased "dramatically" (again, public perception).
Staff and committee members agreed on the fact that, currently, the money that is coming which is not being
used on the operations budget is going directly into replenishing the Emergency Fund, which was depleted
by the recent disasters and as the millage rates will continue to decrease more and more in coming years,
as population increase.
It is also important to point out that it is the public's perception that this is the situation, as those that
complain are the new residents, when they see that the prior owner of the property was paying a much
smaller amount of taxes than they have to pay today (this is because residents that have homestead
exemption are also protected in terms that their property value cannot be increased by more than 3%/year)
and they are appraised at current market value. Therefore is a relatively small portion of homeowners who
are affected by the high increase in values.
Quorum
Some members commented on the recent quorum problem the CBC has been having. They inquired if the
members can be polled to see if they want to continue to be in the committee, or ifit would be better to notify
their appointing Commissioner/Constitutional Officer to replace them.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC regular meeting is scheduled to be held on Friday, December 16, 2005 at 7:30 a.m., In
Conference Room # 3 of the St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 8:55 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
Carl Hensley, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
November 18, 2005
H:\O SecrelarylO OMB\CBC\Min\11'18wpd
page 4
N
en en Q)
....
~>- 0 0 Q)
-- -- -- ë3 ~
C') c () a> E
c ::I CO -- C
en 0 >- CO ::I E
Ü a> .... 0 0 Q)
en a> :m
a> ..::t:. Ü (.)
.... a> a. I
a.'(3 -- 0 C') .c 'Ë
..c: CO 0 C :;]
-- ::I .!: CJ) E
u en ....J E -- () ~
ro 0 en E CO 0
E ..; a> "C c ~ (.)
0 -- Q) I
en en c a> Q) () .c
I-< a> >- co -- "C Q) Q) -- :;]
p.. a> en .... ~ ~ ~ CJ)
.!: en E >- 0
p.. -- .!: en 0 E E I/
-- a> a> en
< .~ C') () "C a> Ü E E -- Q)
.c (.)
C').~ ~ 0 en >- 0 0 ..... .~
E (.)
u c () en .!: c -- I (.) ëã
.- ::I 0 a> .c I Q) Q)
S .~ a> 3: - .D
"C ""') ::ë ~ co :;] :;] .c I/
(1) 3: E m e a> ::I en CJ) CJ) ëã CI]
~ 0 a> c .!: ë5 () CJ) CJ) ..... .;::
CJ) .... a.-- en c .....
~ () ::ë E E ::ë a.. -, Q) ~
0 a> "C ø () :2 a..
[/) co '£: .!: e c ::I
""') 5.ü l- t;::: a. I I I I 0
- 0
..~~,. N
. . . ~
-- -'---"- ' - --~-_.._--"- - -- -- -----' -------_.~
-.---.---- ---. --. - -~ ¡-------.------------- .._---,---
, --.---,-.~~-~~' .,,, ---:-¡~ '"
_. .__ ._< ____ ~ un ,~ .-----. " "T' "--.'~' ,__,.,_c. .' ~.~- ~._._.
~.______.J,:;_.::.._._- _~~;~_-"_'----",-1_ -----t'.--",,-':':__'.:.c._'- _~.--.i.~'-:.:.......L_~:,.,.....i.'~-,
Q)
-
::s
'ij
(1)
..c:
u
r./1€
§ E
(1) ,_ [/)
i3~
~~~
o ~ ~
--(1) 8 ~
~ Q) Q)
'ij-..c:
p.. ~ ~
::J~o
,------~------------,
¡ I-"-~'''--II
! ' T-~=~-'( i
I J I " .\' : 1-1
.~n_.__ 1 I I, . .' " I >-.
___._.._~ !(,1,\':;_1!)),1, l ..n ._...__u~
,'~~; i \',:-:~_--- J ¡D~~~~--::::"T~-::-;
,~ . ," ,--¡.L-----:.. . "1-· --~'-'--'-"-"::' -"-'
_:_ .~_, ',,_ '_, u___ 'J>" '<, "<. "~~_ ':'. ,_ < '"
;.~~~.___~,- ',', )', ,~_ ~.~:~~-.. -,,-.'-, ';'-.,l~,
c
'§
"C
o
<.9
..::t:.
....
CO
~
....
o
--
CO
.~
"C
....
o
o
ü
a>
()
~
en
::I
""')
It)
o
o
~
en
-
N
~
co
c
E
'£:
ü
..
~,;ftI 'ON VI ~ .s
S~ B"g» ~ ~8~i. ~ ð ...
'E .:; c ..'O..·C..... ..
Oë .~..., :!.. '5:"8-g -g lit &
~Ë O~ ~o ë""~"" ~ e ~
Ill. uS c>- ...,J:a ... f-' a. ..,
~.e IICÐ g¡ ~.!!.!e=..."" S
CO...o >.c ..... GI~!IÞ >- ~ ID
..O·¡¡; 0.,. \to. 1I".a ai..._
CO;.,. 1I·.J::.fa ~
':3 'ii~ 'Os.... ¡ ·êe
:~ ~o UC .itg ~ ;tue
fa- -:15.:ië ~e:5;:.~ .!eUftl~
III" e'ii .ae 3~~~ "=Õ·
~Olll~ '5-ê ';8 C~~o ~ ~~¡8
II'C XI! ~~.~~ $ :ICÞücs
ê! ;" .!ii! !,lIIeë.;! g gij'~..
...0..1Il ~õ e. Co. ,,"uou
~ . II 13 ... ~ C=...õ U c
<; 'Oê ÕO 1::'6-3¡ !!' '-cc:'J
¡g ëa-e g:; 6.5æ'g·ët e'..:'§,
&~ ~~¿.¡~.~;~.! ~ ~j~8
!I ¡~I~§lf~I!~; I:!!
:»... Ej!!'<f~ 11.!.?ae ë:.2~i 0
.S!:¡ =: Co II =ö I VI'- u >.~ Õ .! -e ~ c( 0 OJ CD
.. ::> t: < C .. :: -- · C C ..r.... < C :::
o II) fa C(.! II c ~ t!.S! ë:Z .ë I ~ I Eo.!!
!..~c I I a.Øl211 ".!ïiSë..o cO I G.I
~I: ~ iSla 1;: "ã.e:-g~! ~ ~ ;1'7
o a.,! 'Oc '¡¡;'ii ::: 0 a.<:É ::>.. -=.. ë'O '0 ....1
~ :i õi .! ~:s 3 e :i ~ .~ 8 :J :. ~.5 ...0 ¡ i ;;
.- 111._"._ C c if:_
y__~.Q..'º_._~_,_~__.u'..""'m__=_.'o 0:: ..
,.1.
,____,______nn____' -.. T' __..._n_nn_n__·n' ...
~~~~.~~-~=~nt.~-~~~~~.===-=.J~=
o
OJ)
~
.-
~
,;c Ü ~
I'D " . ñi ..
f..; Q.·ü a.
!= ~ c e
"At VI ~ ~
ãí ...Q ~~ c;:: 2
>- c:ë:c ta- CD 0
Õ ~.~~ -;-g:ð ¡
c ~-ãf¡ >." ~ ">;. ~
'$ ;=~.Q¡ g:¡;:: !i
.IJ ......0 üu,- ~.!!."
..e ! e .!! &.!! : ~ e := !
.....".,.Q. --e ~.
'5 !..i:i ii!e ! :~o~!
.. "3d! ..... ! ftlvriS..:o
~ t::;¡,! ...: ... '¡c~IIJ~E
:t:: s.r.c 0= 0 ...2!.o!i
~ "".. s:. ~ õioc~
~ .s¡·; ~'5 ~ c o~~ w
E!' ".r.= se '6 .g~~'2 go
fa ~~'5 IÞ. c.~.!!Co;'¡
'5 ..c= 'O.r. 8ê c!! °u >-
~ i¡g!i:i'~s~~~~~
o a.e..ca."..c-..c....'"
· .....Oõo!E.,..2.!·üolD.5~
e 1.g~~¡;;oB:t:~¡ZIu..CD
J! ..~.5 '5" . ë 0 -g .. c .!. 1: I I
I ~ III ~ =!! :: . ë o.a c;:: I! !s ~ 1
'OllIIe.....» e'-"'<o~"~
~.~ .~~ = Ë ~1"03j ~Ig ~I~ § I j
u c [!.-- 0 GJ-.-J! =" C
:t 8 .c:S :¡ ~ ¡.!! &; ¡.g I I I I
-
ro
OJ)
Q)
~
o
o
N
-_.~-~--~-~~-~~_.~------~
1-------
----~--~------_..._.._-----
~.....~., ,.....'ç ."~\::~ <'5+ ~n~~=-':~''::-7~ ~-,:' .c-~-=
»
"0
;:j
.....
C/.)
p..
p..
,....¡
>-<
Q)
..s:::
.....
4-<
o
Q)
"5
"0
Q)
..s:::
u
C/.)
¡::
.9
.....
~
.....
¡::
Q)
E
Q)
P..
.§
Q)
..s:::
.....
¡::
o
Q)
.....
~
"0
0..
::>
'õ >. ~ >.
<I:) ..10: t':S .c
= 'E U Q) "0
.g 'õ .g a ~ ~
~ = § § ~ ~
u .g"ii) ~ ] Q..Q) ~
..., .J' ~ ·e ~ .S ~ § .;; ã)
~ ~'g ~.~ -g ~ ~ ] .8 ~
¡::: - 2;>"....... ~ ¡::: 0 0 U .-
t:: .~ -., ~ -v;-' Æ c V} ~ u ~
<8 ¡.:: : "ª .!!:! ~ <8 -g ~ 0 ~
Q)>.Q)ou OQ)"" <CQ
~ "0 .~ .~ F- .... ~ "0 Q)
-Q»<išÕD r..:::_Ei lþ~
ë; ~ b '7 < e .c;¡.s V') = ....
COen<l:)c<I:) p.,CQen 0;j0
__(;j<Q) ...._< 001:
~ ~ ._ en .~ <8 t':S en N U 0
~ Q) Q) .þ p., ~ t p., 1,O.!!:!'.g
.... "0 "0 ~ < Q) ~ 'C;¡ -g < "0 .... U ....
gææ Q..zen <l:)CQ¡,¡,.z ~~;j § ~
d Õ I - ~ I I I'> S ....:¡ S æ
Æ ~l~~~I~] §I~~I ~ j ~! £1
.m'___'_ ________._'_____,_' _..._________
~.-~~::..~~~~ --:~I=5~:~~=;~·~=
~ "Ou'¡:~g
t/.) ~ ~ "5 .~ § 5 0 _ U ~
() U _ ~ C - .;: '¡: :> .s.g..c "
~ ¡'¡"OO~~§E~ I i _"'='
Ë :; ~ ~ 0.. C oS ] ~ '; g ~
o ~ ~ ~ := ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '; ~ ~ ~
Z - ~ .. ._....c ... E 2..c ;0
~ ã; Po Æ ~ ~ ·;1!c _ ìi u .. co u 5
..c:: '"0 CQ _._ .... :J ~.~ ~ 0 °s"E ~
Q -c; ð .2 ::: ~ ~ ~ ~ "fi ~ .~ 7 i ~
o ;~.;2-:cao u:.ëat ~ u..ao
~ ~ u.9 F= ~ § ¿ ~"rJ ]'- U~ ;;.. .Us
.,..... _]::2"" a =';:" a
~ ~ co:j > ú 00 U U =.g t1 1:: g 1:
~ 0 "e.E e -= is >_ .E!_ ~ In :s ø.-ð
-... t) \0 Q.. E Q.. CI] .S c: ...... t!: 8-:= =
~ .0( ~ ~'"O U·-= U '" UI 0 u "CI ~
......... U-cUVJe...c: e8:-:: -5 ë~u
rJ:) ~:;~.8~u: i,,~~u I ~.2~
.~ cr::: ~ "ii Q.. c:: -. C'\ Co 0
~ ~ PI'S ~ ~ § ~ E ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ 8
~ ~.g go en ":;'f; þ.. -< V) 5 CI'i ~ M
cd ] ~ § ~ f! "> c ~ i ~ 'õ => e ~
c::: e lQ ~ Co.. § : ..c = .~ ~ I ë ~
....... c......c...... U ~ co:> .- .!! {j ..CI
C\S !:'.õic~~]~t ~J!~E~ ð',Ë;
" - ~S-O. ~-cu- ~u.$
"'" ~ 'Ë - .- g ... "" ;S ~ ~_ ..§.. :§ "CI !I
. I"'" ~.¡: õi ~.- ~ c ~ ' - - ~ 1! ~
OJo... Q..ut~-£e~ ë u!.Ë1i-;; u"'''
u '- ] S:::.E 0 ~ .g .c E'S!J s.. ~ s ~ 'õ
~ -5 ~ c..;.. g ~ iš 5 .~ ~ ã! e= ëã I c4 ~ ~ ~
. ~ g.!! ~ ~ ¡: ~ ~ ¡; ;;," ~ ; ~I:> :;;I'~ ~ g
~ ...::s _ 0 5 0 "0 0 r-- E._ c:: r-- U 0\ =::1 ~
~ IJ..O:::~I.i=o__~ (.) -<a.:I::I-oS-crtø. ~
1-----,,-------_...:::-
._-----'---,----
~~ '::.<':c~~~<'-, '~.~±~~-::=:~'~ç.~>, ..~:-.cc
Q)
0>
C
ro
() L:
..- (,)
:;j ><
'ï:j E W
~ -; ro .s
- '¡: C, ro
U..... 0
c:/) ~ £. _
~ a.. ~
o .2 ~ ro
,- c ~ ~
~ 0 'S; 0
.... ~ ¡;", C/)
~ U Q)
() ~ C/) Q)
S ~ -æ ~
~ C/) :s g>
~ ~ £ ë
--~--~ ----~~---~--~-
J
-------'.-------
--~-------~.~-.-
-r:::T~~-~~~.~
-----,.-~-__:::::r~
-~- '--'-'- .-~ --. - -.- ,------
-....---..--
-,-J::;,.~~.;_L=_L~_~~_~-"->~_~'-' ~~~~_:__~~
...
en
()
;::s
en
en
~
'ï:j
()
;;>
..-
o
en
()
~
.....a..
~OQ) ~
ã5.....>~ ro ~
~ã5 ~L: "C Q)
U~Q)L- Q) 3:
&g§~ § L-
a.. 0 ~ 'Ë ~ g>.E
o "t:: "C "C 'U 'S; g>
>::J ro ro
~8>-.9 l~~g>
o.......ro» Q) 3:~
,- '"' "C "C ~ ~ ~ L-
.....Q)~roo>U~ 0
~ .~ ::J Q) C ro Q)u .m ~
o ro L: L-'¡: a.. \u c:
. Q) C ~Q)
ã: '0 I- L- æ C Q) ~ c.
'+- 2i..c ro..c g::::.- ro
o C/) ~ ro "C '¡: E ~ c.
§~Q)£.2 a.. = U ro
:.¡:¡ Q) 32 ~:a .2 L-Q)Q) j 0
ro13Q)Q)Q) CO _.....
Oo..c~C.E>CQ)
.- ro >< C Q) Q) ::J
> 0 ,!!l (,) Q) _ ~ ~ "C ~
. .~__~__.______t
----_._~---_._.._._-- --
~;.... ',::0:.. -, ....'~:==.çF::_...:...:::.': _-" .::.-.::': ~=~
":'- "'~. -ì-, -<~-..~ ",_ '. '.' '~_.:_>-..J. '. j"~__~ J_:~
N
>.
"0
~
...
CZJ
¡:l.,
¡:l.,
....:¡
......
C1)
..c
...
4-<
o
C1)
"a
"0
C1)
..c
C,)
CZJ
c::
o
.~
...
c::
C1)
S
C1)
-
0..
S
......
C1)
..c
...
c::
o
C1)
~
"0
0..
~
~
c
o
.~~
:ö.sa c
::> Q "
Cl.O ""
ëò .1!
i:s -5
8&j ë
~ð. ~ ~
me =- õ 6
.!!l ~ ~ .~ !.
~ ~~ ] ~ g ~
......0:( c ¡¡: ~ i
e s~? ~ Q.'" ~
a.. ~h::~ .- '" .3 c
Q)~'5io I! ,5 :gcj,Q
Q) ».c c> ~ 1:: E 'C :¡ C ¡;; '"
::::'8~~ c&.l!~oð,g §~
.- a: ~ '" c JI i!! ~ I e! .E :;
E ~:J::! ~ g 1: CL ;¡ ~ [ C 0
E-g~~it!~~8~9 ~&
R~gJoÆ~~giñ~ ~~
~ '-':E.~aiE¡;l:t§ClE'E c:-§
~ cc..>'2"5~gSOe~rtI g:ge
. - ,2' èi ~ ¡:: 8''''::J U'" 8' ~ := ~ 91 E
~ (/)~C~,,··~-gõC:S8
.... Q)'_Qïõ·Cl. Cl.ClJCIJ...Jo:(
~ 0 L~~ I I I I I I
~- ~---~~---_.
CI)
()
u
'E
()
CZ)
()
CI)
C'j
()
-
()
~
co
o
~
N
_._-----~~--_."-~_.-
.- r-
...----------.
~~--~~ -==~--==_-~--_ T_~~n.==_'
\ ~--:ï: ~'--,..--
- ---- ....-....- '._- "--. -
L-.L_._L~~_-' _~.Lc._'~..1_,~ + "_"- ,_','~, "-'.c'--'_.",L~_'__
CI)
a>
U
'~ t L!)
a> ct1 'o.. a>
(j) .....
- CI) I U
C'j d U 0 0 c:
.¡:: ct1
c: c: ..... L!) .....
.... 0 "0 c..
() CI) L- a> c: a>
¡... ..... U
a> U ..... 0
~ > a> U :.¡:J U
:¡:; W CI) a> ct1 «
u c..
.- ct1 Q) >< Q.
c: - ..... '(3 ct1
t::= L- (j) ct1 a> :º
0 a> a. E .!a :e
.b .... -ct1 "0
« C) c: a> Q. ::J
U a> "0 ..... -,
() C) ct1 "0
- c: "0 0) "0 0) a>
~ '(3 'S; ~ >.L!) ..... >
e ct1 CI) ct1
I c: ct1 L-O Q. 0) ..c:
a> Q. ::J 0)0 '(3 ..... .....
.... C" ,~ N ct1 CI)
CZ) c: -- :.¡:J E ::J
a> L- O)N c:
~ en 3; .E 0...... « c: ~
tì . . . . .
----_._--~-----
---------- ------,-----
~, -,\:-.:.:l.;,~~:~.:'~::....;:==..~~:--__t=.-:=I.:~-:~.~. :-" c~.:. c;~~]::-:
'. ) ~. __~-i.>-~'" '~"'-~
....
U
()
'(31
~
~
()
bl)
!=:
C'j
...c:
u
><
~
C'j
....
C'j
---º-
10
aI
C
'ë
aI
ïii
III
'a
C
III
III
-'I iii
III 1/1
¡; B
&.0
~;¡
C III
.. aI
~ Ii
c(&.
S~
J!III
enJ!
""~
-e::g
.!!!o
O¡¡
cj-å
enc
~~
.
....-- ----------~._,.----
'a
GI
>
e
g,
.5
':í
>0.0
us:
c:=:
&~
II ..
GI
s: OJ
U =
"-
GI )(
E GI
o c
J::~
~-
o 0
- -
":''a
.. GI
GI >0.
g,II
11-
g,GI
..
õ~
GI-
E.~ .
;1;~
" E c
- 0 GI
1II':íJ!
fill..
t/lGI'a
GI.QIII
1;='5
.5 ~_
E "CI ã.
- c =
WII'a
.5
J!!
:;
1/1
!
~
o
¡¡:
c
o
~
II .
E -.
(; ::
....E
c .-
.- -
"CIC
GI 0
>-
0=
.. 1/1
g,O
Eg,
_1/1
:: '6
Q, GI
Q, OJ
= :J
~~ ~----.~-----~~- -_._---~._.-
::
ui
'ao
co
IIN
..,....
00
- ..
.... GI
"'t:
¡:;¡ II
.... =
>0. IT
-'I~
"
GI....
U GI
"&.
ã.-
c .5
.- ..
GI =
-'I U
C u
:J~
:(i
c GI
::CI
I Ii
'a&.
GI U
> )(
o GI
:ïJ!
g,II
IO"CI
C GI
GI E
~~
o
co
N
~
------~-----_._-
-'~-~-~~-~:=. :,: .:-~-'.~;=--J"-.:----\..--~-.-=--==.=:~~
~~_"_",~:...-__..L~.::._""_.....I.__,.....:.J~_'_____4_-~--~--"-'--~J-~~--........;.-.-....J--.:_
E
ct1
L-
C)
o
L-
a.
0)
U
.~
a>
(j)
ct1
'¡:
.....
0)
L-
a.
.
-
c:
_ro
",-g
0.æ
o Q)
NO
-
OJ::
u
ro
LlJ
c:
o
t:~
:;] >
8~
(j)a.>ë
ë..c~
",-Q)
'0 0 IE
c - '0
~ ~ t:Ð
'0 .Q ~
~ê08.
-g '0 Q)
~ æ 0::
Q) E ~
~Eâj
r38ã:
:;:: Q) I
~o::
o .
:;
~
t:
:J
o
u
~:i
Q):E
ã3 ês
Q; 5
C> ,_
c: en
~ ~
c: ¡::. is
.2 'õ ;;:_
üL:
:J 8 -¡¡¡
~<~
o::O::oð",
cj-gg'E
ciSès~
I I I I
=
OJ
c: .0
15 ë j
- Q)
'c E
O(¡j
~ e
oð~
c::Z:
o~
ë;) oð
.~ .
Q)<X;
a.CI)
:J .
(/')
I
ui
>
2
ïii c¡
c: c:
o~
Ie.
c¡Q)
c:O::
:;:; ~
CIJ (\
~o
--------,--------,---'-'--
o
o
N
~
~
.....
o
'E
M-
_ c:
Q)
CI) E
c: CJ)
o CJ)
:.¡:J Q)
ct1 en
- en
U«
a>~
Q.CJ)
>< ,-
We:::
.
--------~------,-----------'--
~-=~ =-:\:~-~~~~~T~'T.,j,:~,' ,~-~:--~-=
M
>.
"0
:J
......
C/)
p..
p..
.....:¡
.......
()
...s:::
......
........
o
()
-;
"0
()
...s:::
u
C/)
c:
o
.~
"E
()
8
~
0..
.§
()
...s:::
......
c:
o
()
......
~
"0
0..
::J
~
:!:
.S
III I ~ g
.¡ 5': I ui'"
E 'õ .. 8f
.5 c .! N~
CI 0 ~ 'õ8
~ Eu- .S t"
..0 11'1 E~
CII ,... E,c "
11'1 Q. ~u 1í
~ ~ ~ ~~ e.
5 ~ I ~I~!>;
; ~ e ~!!¡~
J! 9 Q. cgQ.II/)
i ~q~ ~S~;,~
~~~;; CII 8-g:z¡ gm
.. 1::~ g ....üb·!!Œ
"::~J! CII I~c,g~
~~I/)~1: ==6';<
c:>.iil!!ð; '~GOU Et-
1íoD·CC.. ~CII¡a:~~
",,'01í~" ..J-'-
UCII" Olþl/)I!! :>'01
oUQ.¡Q.8iiGO:¡¡l/)c
a: ¡ I ãi IN 'CoD,C t.2
~¡~:~~ë§!,cÕ~ 0
>"~""~V~ZQ. W ;
____ ~___~_~_~u_____~________ N
CI)
........
ro
o
tì
a
~
()
E--
b.O
ç:::
o
~
12
o
..t::
í/)
---'---------'-----'-,--'-~----'----' ---- --
.----:-r.~-~
..,....- --',.-- ..:--..;....~-~ ".._-..,.~_.
, . ... .
---' .-----'-' ~-- ..~_.- --_.':"',..--- ~--_..--
--'-'--~-~-'..-:.,-~.~)-----'-'-~-,-"'-,.....;.-,
_____...._1_·, ,--_,L..:;,-_-.l:.>~'-'
::!
CD oð _
g .ª 0
Në bc"~ ~
-oQ) ~.. C»
E oGO m
....; Q)_ ua: Q)
aC»5 "e ...J
m;l.Ë1š _
¡¡; C:" ~> """-
......mg,<~ -6'
~:Š >.< -ð'.a
t:: Q) CII "'0 'C' ::J en
::J !/) :: ::J m +-' L-
o mU+-':>' en m
Üü..ent ~ Q)-
.2 Q)Q. c.~
:5 "'0'= !/) CI ::J C. Q)
- Q) U m8 "'OQ) «õ >-
m êa~ Q)ö >"'0
I:g i ã>:. -5 ~ c: .a
- Q):2 a:: = ~ en Q) Q) en
~ L- ~ ~-I!1ii"'O C,,) E I'V'
æ ~ .s 0 ~8 § ~ 0 0
~ 15 ~ ~ð CJ z ~ a:: ~
--º---~--~---~-~_. ----- -~---~-
CI)
.......
u
()
'~
~
~
b.O
ç:::
'§
o
u
~
»
]
CI.)
~
~
......
~
oS
1+-4
o
~
:g
~
.d
u
CI.)
¡::
o
, ...
~
5
5
j
~
oS
¡::
o
~
.ti
8"
--- -~---~ - - -~----
.,-~ -\ .' -,\-þ-~~, ',' .....,.'~
'''~-~~~'+'.=-~ =~.":-.:.~_.~~ ,-,~~. T~~):'0<-:~'~-:~'- ,~~~
CLERK OF THE COURTS BUILDING
FUNDING SOURCES
Loan 1
Loan 2
$3,000,000
921.735
$ 3,921,735
General Fund
General Fund
$ 900,000
710.442
FOOT Grant
$ 1,610,442 ./
$ 500,000'
$ 155,357 .
FEMA
Down Payments
<Impact Fees)
$1,000,000
1.471.335
$ 2,471,335 .
Court Facilities
Funds
$1,222,771
212,520
150,587
Franchise Fees
$ 1,585,878 .
$ 678,225 .
$10,922,972-
500.000 '
$11,422,972 .
Available Nov. 21,2005
Transferred from Jail Constr, Savings
Loan from Monumental Staircase Bond Issue $ 440,028*-
$11,863,000
* Monumental Staircase Bond Issue
Loan to Clerk of Courts Building
BALANCE
$ 1,238,000-
440,028
$ 797,972.
NOTE:
Project reserve will be established following completion of value
engineering
Also have requested $1,000,000 from Fort Pierce Redevelopment Agency
$2,500,000
700,000
2.300,000
$5,500,000
3.400,000
$8,900,000
400,000
$8,500,000
NOTE:
SPECIAL NEEDS SHELTER
RECOMMENDED FUNDING SOURCES
State Funding
Mitigation Grant
Parks Referendum
Estimated Insurance Proceeds
Demolition of Civic Center
Available
Have requested $1,800,000 from State Legislature's 2006/2007
Budget
St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners
Strategic Planning Session
Draft Strategic Plan 2.0
(Revision Dale: December 7, 2005)
Introduction
This plan is organized in three sections, Section one presents a number of goals and strategic
choices for the board to consider regarding service and system enhancements or expansions.
Section two presents choices for how the strategic plan can be funded over existing
mechanisms and how the financial health of the county can be maintained. Section three
presents choices about actions involved in the implementation of the plan.
A number of items have been identified by both the BCC and staff, Items already scheduled
for discussion have been placed in a "future events" section as well as some items which can be
handled on an infonnational basis.
Vision:
S1. Lucie County will develop in an environmentally and economically sustainable manner
using innovative growth management, economic development and fiscal management tools to
create compact communities in natural protected settings and technology driven, higher wage
jobs,
Section One:
New or Improved Services and Svstems
Goal: Manage growth and development to produce high quality, sustainable compact
communities
1. Do we want to institute transferable development rights county wide?-Brillhart
2. Do we want to consider targeted funding mechanisms and new staffing for large
scale restGfation efforts for environmentally sensitive lands? If so, specific funding
mechanisms will be discussed in section two, - Bessey
3. Should we continue and strengthen the linkage between development rights and
public benefit? - Outlaw(check list)
Goal: Diversify and strengthen the economic base of the county
1. Should the county continue to facilitate an effort to develop a conference
centerlhotel complex at an appropriate site? - Daum
2. Among the funding tools in use for King's Highway, should the County study the
feasibility of creating a King's Highway CRA? - Brillhart
3. Among the funding tools in use for Midway Road, should the County study the
feasibility of creating a Midway Road CRA (US 1 to SR 70),- Anderson
Goal: Support a stronger health and social safety net for county residents
1, Should the county facilitate a community consensus about a health care
district? - Ryder
2, Should the county reinstate indigent health care funding? - Ryder
Goal: Develop and maintain appropriate public facilities
1. Do we want a policy to encourage public private sector partnerships to develop new
public facilities to be developed that would include mixed public-private uses? -
Daum
2. Do we want to increase the maintenance budget for essential maintenance projects?
If so, funding mechanisms will be discussed later. - Shinn
3. Where should the new EOC be located? - Southard
4. Does the BOCC confirm the location of the historic village at the fairgrounds?-
Keogh
Section Two: Fundine: the Stratee:ic Plan
Goal: Diversify and strengthen the financial health of the county via alternative
funding sources
1. Do we want to establish a five year goal for reduction in property tax rates with
annual progressive targets? - Gouin
2. Should the county adopt Y2 cents sales tax for specific projects for how many years?
3. Should the MSTU fees for stormwater be increased? - Gouin
4. Should the county estimate a growth fee for the unincorporated area to be paid by
the developer for items not covered by impact fees? - Anderson
5. Should we examine an ESL impact fee implementation? - Bessey
Section Three: Implementine: the plan
Goal: Maintain effective internal, inter-governmental and community relations
1. Does the BOCC wish to affirm its existing commitment and practices to
working in partnership with other public entities?
2
Scheduled discussions and reports
The following items were identified by BOCC or staff and are already scheduled for discussion
or a report is in development, therefore will not need to be discussed at the Strategic Planning
Session.
· Attainable and workforce housing issues will be addressed in a Nov 15th workshop,
If further discussion is needed at the strategic planning workshop it will be
scheduled, - Ryder (Attainable Workforce Housing Task Force)
· Are we willing to accept payment from developers to pay for increased staffing
resources and compensation dedicated to growth management TVC
implementation? This issue will be addressed in a January workshop, - Outlaw
· Are there any other land preservation strategies the county should consider that does
not always involve county ownership? An infonnation packet on strategies in use
will be delivered to the BOCC, - Bessey (Memo is done)
· A presentation will be prepared for the BOCC on the county's use of energy
efficient practices in its public facilities. - Shinn
· A report will be prepared on the County's strategy to support a higher education &
continuing education presence as a key component of economic development,-
Daum
· A report will be prepared on how the county's economic development strategy will
support enhanced retail opportunities. - Daum
· Environmental Resources will prepare a presentation for the BOCC on standards
that would encourage "green" or sustainable construction in the county, including
energy efficiency, - Bessey
· Memo to BOCC with recommendations from staff on start time for public
hearings?- Anderson
· Do we need any additional efforts to protect water quality in the county? What is the
changing role of298 drainage districts with respect to water quality? - Staff will
meet with the Districts on December 1 th and there will be a workshop with the
Board and Districts in February, West & Brillhart
3
(CBC)
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
SCHEDULE FOR MEETINGS
YEAR 2006
1/ 20/ 2006
2/ 17/ 2006
3/ 1 7/ 2006
4/ 21/ 2006
5/ 19/ 2006
6/16/ 2006
7/ 21/ 2006
8/ 18/ 2006
9/ 15/ 2006
1 0/ 20/ 2006
11/ 17/ 2006
12/ 15/ 2006
Note: Meetings time /dates /place: 7:30 A.M,/Third Friday at month/ Cant, Room # 3
(CBC)
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
SCHEDULE FOR MEETINGS
YEAR 2006
1/ 20/ 2006
2/ 17/ 2006
3/ 1 7/ 2006
4/ 21/ 2006
5/ 19/ 2006
6/ 16/ 2006
7/ 21/ 2006
8/ 18/ 2006
9/ 1 5/ 2006
1 0/ 20/ 2006
11/ 17/ 2006
1 2/ 1 5/ 2006
Note: Meetings time /dates /place: 7:30 A.M./Third Friday at month/ Cant, Room # 3
wW 0 0 0 0 o ~\~
CO eo 0 0 o M:,M
Z= CD it) ~ 0 ~'" en", \ 0",
'" '" '" '"
M M 0 0 o 1'--\ CO
N CD CD 0 CD OO\qo
~D en en en ~ it)CDN
'" '" '" '" '" '"
I'-- ~ N CO ~ ,It)
WI. ~ 0 ~ tit tit ~
~ ~ tit
.,:» tit fh
iiI-an
UlZO
UUlO
Z&N t- >-
t-
~ W .. % -
I~ W ...J
-
:æ to \
u.:»a= W «
en -
...J
~;=\ W \~ \~ \
C) :J
« to \...J ...J
Z-2\ :æ :æ
:»ww\ - ...J...J
« W \8 ««
oa=u\ 0 ~ 1m LL
0 0 LLt-...J
UwW \0 t-~...J
W W IW I~ ~ 1«
IIIZQ ~ ~ \~ OOLL
\w
-c \x æ I-
:æ :æ :æ 'en
Uu \w en ~
- - - >-%0
l- t- t-
:»- en en en ~ ~O:J:
..I~ W W W >- w-tn
.~ ...J ...J ...J I- >~
tñi « « \« ¡% o ..J
(.) ~\~
l- t- \~ \ð
0 0 wt::o
I- \t- \0 ~ :Ell-
~
It
t-
Z
II
.
II
=
::)
II
.
t:üi ~
z~ ~
:)=wcø
°c~~
U2ïCa:
!Caw
uaD.CA
:)4:)==
.... w
.... U
1-_ W
fIJ . Q\
~ \
~ \
v \
_ 1
i I
:)
z
o ~
It) U)
CO ~
.. ..
N ~
(If) CO
o t-
.. ..
CO U)
~ ~
fit fit
U)
CO
U)
..
~
It)
N
..
~
fit
U)
CO
U)
..
~
It)
N
..
~
fit
\
ffi IS
\:E I a1
W <C
Cf) -
~ ..J
W :J >- \
C) a1 t-
« :æi: Z \
:E _ :J \
<C \
~ \::1
W\<C
~ i~ !\~ \u.
~ \~ \:æi: \~
~ I~ \~ \~
...I ...I \...1 \...1
~ .~ \~ \~
o 0 \0 '0
t- t- It- It-
,
0 ~ CD 0 c.ø~ I'-
M ~ CO 0 COM ~
It) I'- t-- 0 I'-en I'-
.. .. .. .. .. .. ..
en c.ø ~ ~ 0 ~ I'- en
It) ~ ~ 0 ~ CO en
IIIW en t-- N ~ CO CD ~
.. .. .. .. .. ..
== It) ~ ~ CO It) c.ø
M N ~ 4ß- 4ß- 4ß-
~ ~ ~
Ua 4ß- ~
-a.
=~
~~...:g >-
ZZZO I-
elllN I-
Z -
~&&U) w ..J
-
O...III~ I:E In
U_fna:: Iw «
en -
!!!~a=W ..J
w ~ >-
ulII=»m C) :)
I-
~ZII::E « In Z
:E ..J
... Z ! WI :E 15 ..J ..J
- ..J
-CIII(') « w « «
I-III~W c ~ 0 en u. u.
en.,.....c c c c W l- I- ..J
~ ..J
.....111 w w w > ~ 01«
fn" I l- I- .... ~ 0 :I: u.
lIIe « « « w :I: en I-
U& :E :E :E en en z ~
- - - w
Ze l- I- I- >- QI~
~a en en tn ~ ~
W W W >- w I-\en
..J ..J ...I I- > « ..J
u. « « « ,Z 0 C) «
l- I- I- :) 0 - l-
I-
0 0 0 0 w - 0
l- I- I- 0 ~ :E I-
III
=111
2=
~a
~L
:»:»..,
z...8
>-ZN
I-III~
Z:¡.a
:»IIIE
01)1
U~CD
:»1:1
!HID
U:¡
:»-
..1111
.~
...
I)
Q)
~
ro ro
8 .5
~ ~
.~ en
~~
Q)
U'"'O
~ Q)
~ ~
~o
('f)~
0(0
ex:>~
~ 0)
~
(O~
I'- o~
~ex:> 0 0
O~Eß-Eß-Eß-
Eß-
0)
('f)NI'- ex:>
01'-(0 N
O)NN.. ~
~ ~,..,.. ex:>
I'- 0') ...~ ~
~(ON LO~
~..q ~o-+
~ ~ 0) "
0')ex:>Eß-Eß-=
Eß-Eß- 'Q'7
..ql'-Oex:>
..q000')
en ~~~o~~
Q) Q) NOON
U ~ I'-..q LO ex:>
~ ~ ..q~ex:>~
ro ro LÔc.ôa)Ñ~
~ Q) N N Eß- Eß- 'Q'7
~ ~ Eß- ffl
N
~ I
I Z
Z W~
~ 00
o LL «
« LL >-
>-wwos
S~OCj):c
:C~ZLL(!)
(!)CJ)«LL:c
:c <c 0::: 0:: ~
O~~~6J
W WLL Z CJ) LL
LL -
..q
(0
~
~
~
ex:>
I'-
(0
~
Eß-
~
('f)
I'-
~
ex:>
~
('f)
~
~
..q
ffl
0')
..q
ex:>
..q
..q
(0
('f)
(0
ffl
-1
«
~
o
~
\
BOARD OF
COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
CRIMINAL JUSTICE
COORDINATOR
Mark J. Godwin
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Douglas M. Anderson, County Administrator
Mark J. Godwin, Criminal Justice coordinator!Ø
December 14,2005
FROM:
DATE:
CC:
Board of County Commissioners
Dan McIntyre, County Attomey
Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Faye Outlaw, Assistant County Administrator
Public Safety Coordinating Council
Citizen's Budget Committee
~~[o{
I 'VI /
RE:
Status Report of the Criminal Justice System Assessment
As per your request of November 28,2005, I have nine (9) projects that I'm currently working
on which will benefit not only the criminal justice system in St. Lucie County, but most
importantly the average daily population at the County jail. These projects are as follows:
1. G.P.S. Electronic Pretrial - (Sentencing Altematives, Inc.) The implementation of
this program will be starting in the next few days. As presented before the Board,
the contract provides enough funding for 100 defendants to be selected and
released by the courts on to this program.
2. The Board passed pretrial Release Program - Resolution No. 05-338, and an
implementation committee for the development of a Pretrial Services Program
was approved. I will be recommending that the committee (Chief Judge, Sheriff,
State Attomey, Public Defender, Jail Director and Criminal Justice Coordinator)
making a decision at the next meeting as to the type of program design, such as:
1. County run pretrial program (county staff operating program)
2. Utilize the current G.P.S. provider to perform this function
3. Utilize CUlTent reporting program in the County (CO.R.E.)
JOSEPH E SMITH, DistricT No, 1 . DOUG COWAf',D, Disrricr No, 2 . PAULA k LEWIS, DistricT No, J . mANNIE HUTCHINSON, Districr No, 4 . CHRIS Cf',AFT, DisTrrcT No, 5
CounTy AdminisrroTor - Douglas M, Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue · 3rd Floor Admin. Annex · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 . Phane (772) 462-1441
FAX (772) 462-1440 · TDD (772) 462-1428
I believe that this phase of pretrial release should be operational by late spring.
National research has indicted that when fully operational, and with judicial
participation, at least 20% of the jail population could be in one forn1 of pretrial
release or another (GPS, Pretrial, Day Reporting). The current average jail
population is 1,335 therefore; approximately 197 defendants would be
participating (this is a very conservative figure).
3, Data Exchange - This project involves point-to-point data flow from the jail to the
State Attorney, and to the Clerk. The Board approved the funding for the data
lines. This project will provide case information automatical1y which should
result in the faster process of cases, therefore, resulting in a more efficient
process. The goal is to not only eliminate paperwork lag, but also reduce the
average length of stay (ALaS) on the inmate population. No exact number can be
estimated on how this project wil1 reduce the number of beds, but I will track the
ALOS, as it relates to the net effect on jail population, The data lines should be in
place in the next 30 days, and some data should be transmitted in the first quarter
of 2006.
4, Mental Health Court - This is currently being developed by the Sub-Committee
(Mental Health/Substance Abuse/Criminal Justice) of the Public Safety
Coordinating Council. A Mental Health Court is moving forward and will benefit
the entire system, especially the jail. It has been reported that 20% of the jail's
population is comprised of inmates that suffer from various mental health
disabilities, A Mental Health Court will address the needs of qualified defendants
on a regular basis. This would ensure that proper treatment services would be put
in place and actively monitored by the court, The committee believes that the
Mental Health Court could be operational in January 2006. Mental Health Court
in Alachua County currently has 20 participants that are not incarcerated.
5. Inmate Packet Proiect - Inmates not being transferred to the State prison system
due to a paper flow process resulted in up to 75 inmates waiting an average of 5
weeks before they were transported. This large bottleneck has been resolved and
the process is working much smoother now. I'm continuing to monitor this issue
on a weekly basis. The current jail population would be at a higher count if this
efficiency hadn't been implemented.
6. YOP Rocket Docket - In order to help resolve the huge number of probation
violators in the County jail, due to the zero tolerance policy of the Department of
Corrections, Chief Judge Roby allocated judicial resources to help reduce the
length of time that yap defendants are awaiting their hearing. As of this week,
the rocket docket has resulted in approximately 69 hearings being held, (25 cases
have been sent to DOC, 26 cases received jail time, 14 were returned to
supervision). I'm continuing to make recommendations and track this specialized
court process. This is another process that if not implemented, the current jail
population would be at a higher count (at least by 25 inmates).
7, Substance Abuse Treatment Beds - During the last PSCC meeting, I made the
recommendation to have treatment dollars spent, by the Department of
Corrections, for St. Lucie County defendants. Mr. Rick Hill, Circuit Director
confinned that these funds ($1,000,000,00) have been allocated to DOC, but were
not being utilized, These funds can be used for drug treatment beds, in lieu of
incarceration. The motion was approved by the P.S,C.C., and a documented
request was sent to DOC for this expenditure request. I will follow up with
DOC's progress in contracting with a local provider. This funding could provide
60 treatment beds if contracted at 45.00 per day, with an outside provider.
8. Misdemeanor Case Management - I'm in the process of recommending that an
expedited misdemeanor process be identified in cases that have already been
given State Prison commitments in felony cases. These inmates can't be
transported to State Prison due to the pending misdemeanor charges. I plan on
working with the Jail, State Attorney's Office, Clerk and Judges to help with this
process. Last month, 22 inmates that had already been sentenced to prison were
still waiting at the county jail for their other cases to be resolved.'
9. Case Management - I have met with the computer programmer of the jail
management system, along with jail officials. I will be receiving jail reports that
will identify all pretrial cases that are in custody. I will then develop a case flow
process and make recommendations to the Clerk, State Attorney, Public Defender
and Judges that will result in jail cases being placed on a faster docketing track.
The benefit of this process is that the average daily jail population will shrink.
This case management process will result in more efficient coordination of all jail
cases,
10. Civil Citation (Notice to Appear) Proiect - The St. Lucie County League of
Women Voters workgroup has been reviewing civil citation data. Civil citation is
a process whereby Law Enforcement officers have the discretion of giving a
notice to appear in lieu of an arrest for certain crimes. This data has not been
tracked before, and the early raw data reflects the following:
Agency October 2005 November 2005
SLSO 5 9
PSLPD 9 Pending
FPPD 37 61
This is an early fonn of Pretrial Release, and works saving not only bed space, but
also the time it takes in having to book an defendant into the jail.
Projections: Jail growth projections can be tracked by several different variables. I have
looked at the rate of projected growth by the jail, the case filing rate (actual
number of defendants charged) and the criminal justice assessment projections by
Dr. Kalmanoff. The best indicator of jail growth is tracking the "rate of
incarceration compared population growth (see chart on page 5).
Jail Proiections - Sheriffs data shows that there has been a 15% increase in the
annual average inmate population from 2001 to 2005. The jail is currently 26%
over populated with 1,05t9beds being the current capacity. If you factor the 10%
Fire Marshall's variance the current inmate population would be 15% over total
capacity.
If you factor in POD # 2 - (1370 total beds) you would have 38 extra beds
(current average population of 1332),
Jail Capacity
Main Jail = 794
POD 1 = 256 (T = 1050)
POD 2 = 320 (T = 1370)
(10% Fire Marshall Variance = 1155)
(10% Fire Marshall Variance = 1507)
Court Filings - the percentage change in Felony filings has increased by
32%, and the Misdemeanor filings have increased 47% from 2004 to 2005.
Furthermore, legislative changes also cause increases that are unexpected, such as
Domestic Violence offenders, which are required to remain confined until they
are seen by a judge,
Case 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 Projected %
Projected chg 04/05
County 5497 6394 5364 8123 10,544 +32
Criminal
Circuit 1854 2002 2452 1922 2829 +47
Felony
Domestic 688
Violence
934
888
+29 from
2001 t02005
The St. Lucie Criminal Justice Assessment reported (according to U.S. Census) that St. Lucie
County has grown by 28.3% from 1990 to 2000. Furthermore, Dr. Kalmonffreported, "in the
long tenn, jail population should grow at about the same rate as county or area population". He
also indicated that population of the jail depends on a number of unknown factors, such as
amount of crime, new legislation and pretrial release and diversion programs being put in place.
Fmihermore, the population of St. Lucie County is projected to increase by 126% over the next
25 years growing from 235,000 to 532,103 persons.
The current average jail population (1,332) times the County population (235,000) results in a
high incarceration rate of 5,66% per 1,000 residents. The following jail/ population chart
reflects the population growth and the incarceration rate.
Year 2005 2010 2020 2030
County Pop. 235,000 275,000 330,000 532,013
Incarceration 5,66% 5.66% 5.66% 5.66%
Rate per 1,000
Jail Population 1,332 1,556 1,868 3,011
W /0 pretrial
Jail Population 1,135 (197) 1,306 (250) 1,606 (262) 2,590 (421)
with pretrial *
* Pretrial projections are 20% (very conservative figure) of the average population minus the
YOP Cases.
Pretrial Projections: As I reported earlier, a national average on pretrial programs reflects a 20%
participation level akin to that of a jails inmate population. Furthermore, when fully
implemented and if utilized properly, the results as identified above, will be quite impressive,
In dealing with pretrial release programs the intangible benefits for eligible defendants include
returning to their home and work. This affects the fabric of our County. It is far more cost
effective to provide pretrial release than to confine defendants, when they do not represent flight
risk or further threat of criminal activity. This is especially true when compared to housing an
inmate at $47.50 per day at the County jail.
Please don't hesitate in contacting me if you have any questions concerning the above initiatives.
12/~6/2005 01:50
772-462-2135
COURT ADMINI!;ìTRATION
PAGE 02/03
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS
INTER··OFFICE
MEMORANÐUM
2005··110
TO: All Judges of the Nineteenth Judicia.l Circuit
FROMQYm Willis, Trial Court AdministJ:ator
DATE: December 7. 2005
RE: SRS Statistics· 2005 Third Quartcr New FilÙgs
Listed below is a comparison of total new filings from 2001, 2002, 2003, and 2004 plus
the first, second and third quarter figures for 2005. 1 ha.ve aho included a projected percentage
change.
Felony
·01/05 - Projected Proj ected
200J 2002 2003 2004 09/05 20(~ % chg 04/05
IRC 1086 1182 1144 1270 1088 1450 +14
Martin 1103 1.076 1093 1108 1100 1466 +34
Okee 457 535 604 618 470 6;~6 0
St. Lucie 1854 2002 2452 1922 2122 2829 +47
TOTAL 4500 4795 5293 4918 4780 6371 +29
Domestic Relations
01105- Pro.i ected Proj ected
2001 2002 2003 2004 Q9/05 2002- % chg 04/05
IRC 1942 1945 1782 1849 1433 1910 oj-3
Martin 1578 1791 1567 1649 1234 1645 0
Okee 987 939 815 840 618 823 -2
St. Lude 3451 4046 3797 ~77 2783 3710 -6
TOTAL 7958 8721 7961 8315 6068 8088 -2
Circuit Civil
01/05- Projected Projected
2001 ~ 2003 2004 09/05 200~ % chg 04/05
IRC 852 829 894 787 664 885 +12
Martin 1128 1028 1133 988 801 1068 + 8
Okee 352 322 379 329 275 366 +11
St .Lucie ~ 1801 ZQL2 1760 1405 1873. + 4
TOTAL 4177 3980 4418 3864 3145 4ln + 8
.... " ... .. ..,..,,, r~_.._."'_.,,,,,, II ..."";...;"-_ rt I II; C'Ø'II...'Io. 't'..,..........A c· R"..,. 1>4a,·",a. ~'nr;n"a ~Aa"," ... ("7"7')\ .1(;').14177
12/06/2005 01:50 772-462-2135
COURT ADMINISTRATION
PAGE 03/03
Page 2
2006 Second quarter filings
Probate
01105- Pro~ ected Proj ected
2001 2002 ~ ~ 09/05 200i % ch~ 04/05
IRC 916 980 1021 1070 859 114:5 + 7
Martin. 892 790 914 821 653 870 + 5
Okee 186 195 229 230 226 30L +30
St. Lucie 1547 1849 1927 1713 1311 174'l + 1
TOTAL 3541 3814 4091 3834 3049 4063 + 5
Juvenile
01105- Proj ected Projected
2001 2002 2003 2Q04 Q2/05 200:~ % chg OM05
IRC 898 985 880 743 627 835 +12
Martin 1233 1067 1055 1025 806 1074 + 4
Okee 665 606 576 574 469 62.5 + 8
81. Lucie 2060 2476 2334 2102 1756 234l +11
TOTAL 4856 5134 4845 4444 3658 4875 + 9
County Criminal
01105- Projected Projected
20Q1 2002 2003 2004 09/05 200~i % che 04/05
IRC 2378 2595 2365 2499 1865 2486 0
Martin 3469 2791 2480 2719 2936 3914 +43
Okee 930 811 908 1103 658 877 -20
St. Lucie 5497 6394 5364 8123 8082 1 O.77(! +32
TOTAL 12274 12591 11117 14444 13,541 18,053 +24
County Civil
01105- Proj ected Projected
2Q01 2002 2003 2004 09/05 200~~ % chg 04/05
IRC 1948 2219 2548 2227 1793 2390 +7
Martin 1971 2100 2163 2000 1629 217~. +8
Okee 654 754 727 681 482 64~. - 5
St. Lucie 5455 6040 6324 .lli.2 4990 6652. +15
TOTAL 10028 11113 11767 10647 8884 11,85í +lJ.
THW Ikhg
~ LJI:.'_. 14. .:lJLI":) ~ : 1 br'f'l
The Po1rr: B~.oh PQ$1 . SA \IE Docllmm¡ Deltvel")'
r'HLf'l t;;t.HI_H r-\J~ I t-':::>L
r'll) . c:q 1
THE PALM BEACH POST
EMINENT DOMAIN CASE DRA WS
NATIONAL SPOTLIGHT
Date: Sunday, December 11,2005
Section: A SECTION
Edition: FINAL
Page: lA
By PAT BEALL and PAUL LOMARTlRE
Palm Beach Post Staff' \Vriterli
Memo: Did n.ot run MSL,
Info boxes at end of text. An occasional series
INSIDE RiVIERA BEACH: The feuds, the finances, the future
Illustradom PHOTO (2 C, 8 B&W). MAP (B&W)
Caption: 1. (C) Photo by PAUL LO!vIARTIRE
FOX News taped a Hal1nity & Colmes show Wednesday night at Rene and
David Corie's home in Riviera Beach.
2, (C) CAROLYN DRAKE/Staff photographer
Martha Babson gets her makeup done by a FOX News makeup artist
\Vednesday. Babson has helped lead the fight against Rlviera Beach's plans.
3, (B&W) Among Riviera Beach residents who came to the :FOX TV taping:
Marina Byrd (loft) and her husband Andrew, a Cornell-educated planner
whose moth:r lives in an area designated as blighted. Like Martha
Babson(right)~ they oppose the city's redevelopment plan.
4, (B&W) RivÜ::ra Beach Mayor Michael Brown (mug)
5, ~~,p of Rjviera Beach areas that could be taken through eminent domain.
CAPTION: Palm Beach Post photos
Here are some examples of what Martha Babson found: Riviera Beach listed
&tI~: ,in...pbpoil. ~~1II/t9i·b:u/dotumentv L mB;'JST'"PbOS£tlOCNlJM~68' 17 ~TBI\MV'! U :5: S 198,' :~205' 5:2ð2T37:20~80:5::'5 '~1: 7:~ ;6M:S :40 "
t"' "
121;4/05 3:~ PM
P~. lOf9
LILI_.14.'::UIj~ ';'¡;lbt-I' t-'HU' bt.H'_,M r't.J:',: r-::>L
'!')Ic r.lm Btll'h POst, IIJA.VB 1)ocumeal Deliver)'
Ill.,'. C."'tJ.
these homes as 'beyond repair'
6, (B&W) 36 E. 14th St.
Tbe 3..bedroom, 2-batb 28-year"olà home was listed as dilapidat~d or be~rond
repair, Its appraised "alue has risen 16 percent ftom 2003 to 2005.
7. (B&W) 158 W. 12th St.
This property fell victim to a separate redevelopment plan involving the nearby
port. It since has been bulldozed.
Riviera Beach listed these homes as 'deteriorated'
8. (B&W) 191 E. 24th St.
This home's appraised value grew 58 percent from 2003 to 2005. A house
needed to have just one of six problems to be considered deteriorated, including
missing small sections of roof.
9. (B&W) 708 W. FitJ1 St.
Also considered deteriorated¡ the appraised yalue of this house rose 39 percent
from 2003 to 2005.> Ri'\iera Beach listed these addresses as 'vacant lots'
10. (B& W) 1086 W. Nint~ St.
The appraised value of this eight-year-old, l,344..square-foot home increased
35 percent from 2003 to 2005.
11. (B&\V) 122 W. 27tb St.
Built b 1999~ this l,600-square-foot property appreciated 32 percent itom
2003 to 2005.
Martha Babson used to enjoy obscurity with a water view. She lived quietly-
just Babson, her dog and birds sharing a green cottage perched off the
l'1tracoastaL
\Vednesday nieht, she was featured on FOX News.
Babson's grass-roots fight to stop the planned billion-dollar redevelopment
of Rivie,.a Beach has gone prime time, from C~TN to MS~13C to the Los
. Angeles Times.
The hot-button topic is eminent domain and Riviera Belich's right to force
htlp ~I/me .~¡'~ol¡¡O~lç~i·b'"ldij,.umrrtcvl 'tIIL!S T"pb(!$tt1)OC'Nt'~1;6 !6171t'rBJ.MV; ¡" :5. S I ~£!7:S20S: S: lG213i ;10260:5;) 5~91 ;7:3S6~4:5 :4~
r.c:;.
1~/14/0S 3:Q!I PM
\;
PZIC 2 of II
L,·I...·..-. .;.....,. \-~...·I:'..I."..' .... . J. ¡ r' r
rML..I" ¡;J~M'...n r\.J,=, I r-=-,-
I'1L...-'.":'~J.
^ n, P~111 flß~cb POle, S.\ VE DOCllQlel\ í>,,!Iv~ry
people to sell their homes to IT'.ake way for a massive, privately led
redevelopment. If the plan pans out, Babson's neighborhood will sit at the
bottom of a Disney-esque harbor for yachts.
Late Wednesda.y, as Babson stood in her yard. she 8.Dnounced exactly how far
she was wi1ling to go to help stop the bulldozers.
"I'm going to wear makeup tonight," said the self-proclaimed "old hippie," who
has been known to go strai¡ht froll1 gardening to city council meetings.
A few hOUTS later, Babson was at a neighbor's dining room table as a FOX
News makeup artist readied her for her close..up. Outside, FOX News star
Sean Hannity was readying a live broadcast of the Hannity & Colmes talk
show direct ftom the RlvÎlera Beach back yard of Rene and David Corie.
The Cories had lived in the stucco houso for just five years before a Riviera"
funded 2001 study included it in an area declared as slum and blight - rendering
it a possible bull's-eye fOl' bulldozing.
"I kept asking the community r~developtncnt ag:.ncy what they were going to
do with our house," says Rene Corie. "We wore told a park, maybe a parking
lot, th~n maybe a marina. Then they told me, 'We're going to let the developer
decide what to do with your property.'
"That's what really set me off."
Now, Riviera Beach has emerged as the poster child in a national debate over
when and how" or if - homes and businesses can be seized to make way for
privately funded redevelopment. FOX's Hannity has vinual1y adopted the
lS8ue.
Babson, who 1'13.5 lived in Riviera Beach for 23 yeara, got there first. Within
months of the 2001 study's fmdings, she did her own parcel-by-parcel analysis.
Data \\'8S missing from Riviera's analysis, she discovered. "VacantI' parcels
had homes. Sturdy houses were declared dilapidated.
But UIlder Florida law, even good homes can be formally labeled bHghted and
thus targeted for redevelopment - an issue a special state legislative panel is
'now reviewing. The panel is to suggest reforms by the time the legislature
convenes next spring.
!I\Ve go knocking door-to-door, asking people, 'Do you know what can
happen?' " says Rene Corio. "And they all say. 'Not my house.' "
Plan allows taking property
For months, Rlv;eril Beach City Council Chairwoman Liz Wade has tried to
assure residents their properties are not in the cross hairs of condemnation, even
if they are in areas declared blighted. A newly tapped master developer bas
hlp:I!Y3 v..pbpþ't.~om/~gi·ÞiM60;\D1 ~nW 11DBLIST=lb05iDOCNUMo686 ~ 74TBRMV· i 6':5: S 1 H. 7:5205' N0273, 7:20210' 5: 3$:91; 7; H 604:S:40 ...
r.·,:.
J2I14105 J,O PM
Po~~ 3 oU
1.·It-.....1 >1. ..:'LI~I.:> 04 . .J. ( ,.. 1'1
'1"he P~lm B~~c)h PClS: . SA V! DoclD'lltllt D~1iver¡;
it1..)' Ot..H"-.n ,I,...'.::" ¡ r,~L
I '11~. c.~J.
pledged to tðhab homes instead oftakin¡ them whenever possible.
However, Wade recently changed her stance 1Ì'om never taking homes or
busin~sses through eminent domain to doing so only as a last resort.
That's because Riviera Beach's ambitious vision needs private developers to
btúld the condos, waterfront businesses, housing and stores that can breathe
new Hfe into the waterfront city, home to 34.000. And private developments
need land
Às a result, Riviøru's $2.4 billion redevelopment plan allows for taking private
property, and plenty of it. Early estimates were that up to S, 1 00 people - the
population ofthe Æ4"eêl declared blighted - could be displaced. Because the city
won't need to take the entire area and because some homes can
be rehabbed, Riviera '$ actual figures wiU probably wind up much lower,
according to one devr:loper on the project; an estimated 1,000 renters and 347
homeowners.
On paper, though, the plan rivals Washington, D.C.Is displacement of more
than S~OOO residents in the mid-l 950s, still the largest eminent domwl1 action in
the country. And this June, the U,S. Supreme Court ruled that a Connecticut
city could force homeowners to sell their land to make way for economic
devolopment.
Florida's rules are different. A city's redevelopment agency cannot take private
property solely to create jobs or broaden the tax hase. But it can force the sale
of private property to cure blight.
Dina Berliner, the property-rights att.orney with the Washington-based Institute
for Justice who represented homeowners in the Supreme Court case,
said Riviera's blight study results were a foregone conclusion.
"Everybody knows th.e purpose (of blight studies) is to find the area blighted,"
Berliner says. "They 88SWl1e no one will really go through tho study itself with
a flUe tooth comb."
Babson did.
Mayor defends study
Marty !vIurphYI owner of Rivl'1'll's Cracker Boy Boat Workst Inc.; Buddy
Andre, a Singer Island cafe owner, and Gerald 'Ward, 11 consulting engineer,
also questioned whether tbe study might be flawed, Murphy and Andre both
had a personal interest: Ihe newly declared area of slum and blight might affect
their businesses, The trio sc'raped together $350 to pa.y Babson to document
s\.1Spected nUstakes,
Armed with a borrowed digital camera, olipboard, pen and the CR..c\'s colored-
coded map, Babson walked stre~t by street, up one block, down the other.
hH~:liBm.pbpo'l. con:hg:'bìDiJMò :r¡'A 'vi 1D¡¡LIS'r·pÞO~ tOOCNU~'-S8617.T&k/,{V· 68 ,j: j ¡,~ 1:520S:5:20273'7:1 ~28~: ¡ ,355;,; 7; 3 S604! ;40 .,
r....
...~._--
12/:4I1)~ 3~ PM
P&,.=4 of"
[JE:':~ 14. ¿'ODS 4: 1 :::PM F'ALJ1 BEACH POST PSL
11'e. Palm Bco.;h 11.,1 . :'ill VE l)"cuol Dcllve~
.. ---'T10 . 24 J - P, 5--,
12/14,05 3:0!I PI\(
IiI did about 250 hom~s a day," she recalls, "because that was how many
pictures the digital camera would hold. It took three weeks."
When she sat OO\v11 and analyzed the data, sbe was incredulous.
It looked liko "it wa.s done by two guys sitting in a bar and saying, 'let's throw
this Ì11,' " Babson says.
She offered to share her findings at a June 2001 city meeting. No one took her
up OD it. So she \\Tapped the study in plastic and put it on her kitchen shelf. It
gathered dust for a few years, When silverbugs started che'\\>lng on her
pa.perwork, she says, "I figured] had better take it out."
Until The Palm Beach Post inquired, she had shown it to no one,
Now Babson's dog-eared report has taken on new significance, given the
controversy Oyer Riviera!s potential for massive eminent domain.
Among the fimlings:
- The city's blight study reporœd that the nOlth side of a 10th Street block was
vacant. It waSI11t. Four- and five~year-old homes dotted the street.
- 'Where some homes had double lots, the second lot was listed as vacant,
inflating the nt!l11ber of unused properties.
~ Homes in good conâition were classified as dilapidated and beyond repair,
- Hundreds of mobile homes~ including some that later weathered HurriclU1~s
Frances. Jr:>anne aud \Vilma, autvmatically were classified as blighted due to
1.lIIdoçumented safety problems or criticism such as !fa tendency to blow over in
!:I1onns.'
- There were DO findings of high crime rates or fires, a key justification of
blight. City computers were beÙ"..g tweaked to accommodate a new system,
according to the city's study, and 30 the numbers could not be re1rieved.
- Builàings in good shape were declared Itfunctionally obsolete," defined
generally as a structure "vhich, jf torn down, could be replaced with sl)mething
that generated mo:e money.
None of Babscn's fmdmgs sways Riviera Beach Mayor Michael Brown.
El~Cted four times.. always on a redevelopment platform ~ Brown is the person
mostly closely identiíìed with the redevelopment plan, In recent days, he's
twice defended it on TV to FOX News' Sean Hannity.
Ba~k at his Singer Island law office, Brown grows impatient with criticism of
~lIp ;/!:'V'J.~~pO"..~o:~hJi.b¡oilD~u¡'\!!!II"l ?D8LJS'fc~bP~ "DOCNUM~U617&.1'¡¡R!;!V·t ~8:~: S! ~B ;1;520S: ',¡02 ~ 3": Z02S~:¡ ;35 597: i:J 5 ~04:5 :40
Pa¡¡~ ! of9
__'.-. . 'To __.__. ..... ._, I'
, . "._, I &J_. I·...'. I '~._ "-'_
The p",~ Beaçh Pol: ' S^ VB Døcvl\lflU I>cliv,"",
17./i4¡OS 3:D9 PM
the redevelol'ment. Eminent domain almost always involved poor or black
people., he says. "Now, not aU of the faces are black. Now, all ofa sudden it's
tyranny. "
Most of the people uprooted are gcing to be black, though, as the city is mostly
black. Many will be among the city's poorest residents, But Brown and other
advocates insist those homeowners will be relocated to better, government-
subsidized housing that win be built as part of the redevelopment.
As for gaps in the blight study, "If they did 100 houses and got two wrong,
what does that me!.!1.?" Brown asks. "Seriously, is there any question that this is
a blighted area? This is the most ímpovcrished city in the county."
At the time of the 2000 U. S. Census, one out of every tbu.r homes in Riviera
Beach had tr..r-ee l'ooms or less, a figure associated with overcrowding, Eighty
had no pluIl1bing; 327 had no source of heat at all.
¡IY cu drive the mainland, and it's a disgrace," fonner city councll member
David Scbn)'er said recently,
Redevelopment OD track
Ifs a sentin1<~nt echoed by Steve Siskind. a respected Miami architect and co-
author of the 2001 blight st'.ldy, I1Nobody can deny there is blight in Riviera
Beach.I'
Siskind x-eadily admits there a..re plenty of individual houses in areas designated
as blighted that are fine, But that does not violate state laws governing blight.
"E'Vcry single building within a 'blíghted' area does not have to be blighted," he
notes.
That's the probl~~ say critics of Florida's law: Blight is in the eye of the
beholder.
"Given the breadth of th~ definition as it c1.1l1'ently exists, virtually any piece of
property in Florida could be declared blighted," says John W, Little III, an
uttome)' spccializmg in eminent domain with the West Palm Beach rum
Brigham Moore.
FlQrida's criteria for deten1Ùning blight "are so vague they can mean anything,"
agrees property-rights attorney Berliner.
For Ì11stance, even Florida n~ighborhood8 in good condition qualify as blighted
if they are in an area with higher·than-average numbers of police calls, the
traffic. layout is outdated or their neighbors' properties fall into disrepair.
This raises the hackles of homeowners and property rights advocates. Th~y
cl~.ùm the practical defhútion of "blight" boils down to this: If a structure can be
replaced with something that generates more moneYI then it's blighted.
~;W¡I'iV¡.pbpo.:.~om/c~l, bJDI~O~U:1lentv t ?DBLIST =pJUS"DO::N:JM=5a617&T~IìM\'= (1·8:5: J 19~.' :'2C5: ~ :1"273:' :ZC28J.=: 35597' 7:3 6,4 j :4Q
I'ICO II oC9
"'~.,'.,. .A, -r. ~,~,,,_._. _. ..\. _'I I I
, , 1~1' ...'_, ,-'-11 I 'J'-, , I ......~.
, The Pal", St-AM !'()SI . SA VI !:locum..", .ooliVCJ')'
U1l41O~ 3!O~ PM
"What beachftont in Florida couldn't be knocked down and rebuilt with
something that would generate more tax revenue?" Little asks.
}·'urther, if a cìty or county decides blight exists, then just one of 14 blight
criteria have to be met in order for Û14t govenuncnt's redevelopment agency to
e-"ercise emin~nt demain. The criteria are general: Unsafe and uIlBanitary
conditions are one, so is 5ubstancw:d structures.
It's not dcW' whether legislative changes to Florida's definition of blight or rules
on erninel1t domain would help opponents of Riviera Beach redevelopment or
those whose homes have already been determined to be in a blighted area.
''Y ou c~,,'t wuing the bell, It says city council member and retired Circuit Court
Judge Edward Rodgers.
For now, then, redevelopment remaÏns on track.
Her che,ek;s blushed by a FOX makeup artist, Martha Babson sums up her
battle plan for her Hal'1nity & Colmes appearance: III'm like the Indians, and the
white man wants my land.1I
pbeall@pbpost.com
Enùnt.'11t domain questions and answers
\Vhat ís eminent domain?
El:nit;~t dome-in is the power of a gover.m1ent to take private land. Cities and
(·ounties say it is rarely used in Florida. Critics say just being in an area target¡;:d
by the government for redevelopment is enough to push propeny owners to
sell.
What is Riviera Beach's plan to take homes and businesses by emlneUì domain?
The plan adopted by the city's redevelopment agency calls for taking up to all
1,700 homes in the blighted area, possibly displacing more than 5,000 people.
Recently, a developer estimaf'c!d the numbers of people uprooted would be
much lowt.>r: 347 homeowners and 1,000 renters.
Wny?
To m.ake land avaìlable to private developers who can build officials' vision of
a vibrE...'1t waterfront city,
vVhen?
The city, tapped a mast~r developer this summer. A contract is still being
hammered out.
~!!,: ¡'i' "', ;'~os:,çmlogl.bìft'ðolv!õl.n·..l·IDP~rS,.,v~os &tDOCN1J~=~u 7 ctTSP.MV= J út;5 :51 i8:1 'S.OS: S,2eZ~~. 7:20280; ~; 'S~97 :7.~ !004:1 :40 '"
1'38.7...f9
iV., 14. ¿U'd'::> ~ ; <::~!j~'M PRLY¡ SI:..HCH P~S T P~3L
n.e Palm ~.ch ,~,t· SAVE I>ocumQg[ DlliWl")'
nO.2:41--- t". 8--"- .----~.-
12/14/(/j 3:~ I'M
Does the city have to prove the houses are blighted?
In Florida, a redevelopment agency that hopes to use the power of eminent
domain has to prove that it is taking private property for a greater good. That's
been interpreted to mean getting rid of slum and blight.
<'
How is blight defined?
In Florida, two of 14 conditions have to be presem in order for blight to be
declared. They range from high crime rates to "functionally obsolete"
hl.Ùldings, However, lfthe city, county or another taxing aiency agrees there is
blight, jU8t one of those conditions has to be present.
P.ave any homeowners been directly notified yet?
Only a handful have been contacted, Once a contract has been signed with the
master developer, it's bolieved negotiations to buy private property \'till pick up
speed.
Will they get market value for their land'?
The city emphasizes it ha5 provided generous buyout tenns along with a
comprehensive relocation package. Skeptics say it will be difficult for
homeowners to tìnd comparable waterfront houses, even with fair bU}lOUt5.
- Pat Beall
An estimated 5,000 people live in the dark gray area (on map) below
Their hlJmes co'Uld be tak01 thrO\::.gh eminent domaín by Riviera Beach's
Community Redevelopment Agency, which pLans a cìty tellaissance.
fi1Îs is the largest potential eminent domain action in the U.S. in 50 years,
sparking au outcry :!Tom some residents who fear they will lose their homes.
City officials say they will be relocated and compensated.
Are these houses blighted?
BefoIC Riviera officials coUld launch theIr plan for redevelopment, they need~d
to prove that parts of the city met state rules for 'slum and blight. I They
commissÌl\ned a study that said hundreds of Riviera. propertÏC!s were beyond
repa.ir. But a Ríviera resident, Ma.rtha Babson, walked the city's streets to check
the cODdition of properties the city labeled 'blight.' (Babson's 0"1]1 home is in
the area ~cheduled to be taken by emi11ent domaín.)
¡lIp:i:~~;·~. P~PU!, C '''é.lf.;\·bin/4o'ijlll"lot\ 1 "tJU¡ ,,:?~ CS&J)OCNUM:6 86 t, AUR.M1/.,t 6':5:5; ~ t ;":5~H, S :2n7] ,i i~O~8P' 5: 'SS~ '/;7 ·3~ 6t~:S :~O ,"
P"&8 , ~f 9
U::..I_ ' 14. c:l:1U'" .;; : ¿¡JI-T1
'!"lID I'¡¡m &8V,'t¡ ~'I· SA Vß t'Ot_t Iktivóf}
,
f-'RU1 tll:.H":H I'-'U::; l I'-'::;L
~II"
_.....1 -~j~
All content ©
and may not be republished
These. archives are stored on a SA n;:1W newspaper library 'ystem
from M~w3:Baltk Media S,rvlaea.
W"tf ~ 1. .....
trp:ll,sn.p¡..po,t,col'I!Qri ·binld~çgnl<Ptv ¡1D lit.. ¡S ;"'~b~) &¡¡OCN \)M~GS6 i8<':'¡¡RMV~¡í58d: ~: ~$:?; S20S: 1 :20.1 7J: 7:~O~~O:5:3 $59 i: i:)5 1>04: $:40
¡-··¡U. ¿~l ------,....'. :-t--------
12/14105 :1:09 PM
Pal!" 9 cf 9
1-'I4LYI t;t. H' ¿H ¡-·U:,~, i 1-"':,("
I"!'), ,::.:I;:;i:;:1
t-',
IM:S;Cì;: ,;\;;)7 ì'M
h¡.¡p tI;rnj~,h):<¡PW,'\'~b,t~"jfC IiN!9Ú¡7 ¡ ;\m~r,"_! 17 ¡ $)09,11'11
P3¡ii1' of ¡
I I
L
l
EMINENT DOMAIN
EOF
ISC
A Supreme Court ru
stirs demands for
"-'<""'V
';{ is within the power of
that the community
aLthy, spacious as well as
35 can~fu (0
.~¡11endm~~nt t e
- Justic¿ 'NHti.Jm 0.
'154
Ah, the super-liberal WilHam O.
Douglas, patron saint of economic
redevelopmen t.
For half a century, local governments
and unelected redevelopment authorities
have been using eminent domain, or the
threat of it, to muscle residents Out of
their homes and businesses in the name
of redevelopment and higher property
values. The old structures typicalIy are
razed, lots are assembled for larger-scale
development and the new uses produce
more property-tax revenue and eco-
nomic activity. It
renewal, until
got tired of
the grants. It is
"
the smaIl
are now dispersed and
and cash flow must be
the government offers no compensation.
The Constitution may requir~."fu¡¡ com-
Florida Trend
128
By Neil Skene
when property is taken, but
means merely property
business value or
took a U.S. Supreme Court case
Connecticut last June to stir dis-
with this state of affairs
The ca,se, Kelo v. lòwn of
London, started with seven hold-
Owners of 15 out of 115 tar-
near the Long
One owner
born in her house in 1918,
still lived next door. An-
owner, Susette Kelo, had moved
done extensive fix-ups and
her waterfront. These
weren't blighted places, just inconve-
ones. New London wanted to re-
place them with" familiar waterfront:
A museum, more parking, an "urhan
viHage" of shops and restaurants, a rna-
a boardwalk.
Supreme Court said
of the U.S. Con-
which prohibits taking prop-
public use without just compen-
" does not bar a local government
from condemning land for "economic
deve1opment'1 and turning it over to pri-
vate developers.
The KeIo decision was greeted with
a rumble of discontent - from conser-
vatives and landowners who object to a
wide range of environmental and land-
Use constraints on "property rights," and
from Jiber"ls and urbanites who support
neighborhood preservation and oppose
forced evictions. For them, as for] ustice
Day O'Connor in her dissent, it's
to take property for a public
a road or a school or even a pri-
utility, but quite another to take it
for a shopping center or offices.
In Florida, Attorney General Char-
lie Crist initially said Kelo didn't reaIly
affect Florida because eminent domain
can be used for redevelopment only in
cases of "slum. or blight."
Th"t was technically true, but it wasn't
the whole picture. florida's definition of
"blight" is so diluted that it amounts to
virtuaHy no standard at all - largely be-
cause of changes passed by the Legislature
December 2005
in 2002 and signed by Gov.Jeb Bush.
e any problems for
Frank Schnidman,
a Atlantic U niversi-
nd Environmental
Solutions. "It is the actions of the Florida
Legis the current prob-
lems. d an amicus brief in
constitutional stan-
dard for use of eminent domain.
"We've seen ... 15 years of rubber band
st Brigham, whose
B represents prop-
erty t-domain proceed-
ings. Wade L. J: lopping, one of the state's
. wyer-Iobbyists in devel-
rowth management, says
functionally equivalent to
Connecticut. The two are among a num-
ber oflawyers who have urged House and
Senate committees to draft tighter laws as
well as a state constitutional amendment
t owners.
, cynically, that a con-
stitutional amendment would give legisla-
tors, who created the Swiss-cheese stan-
dards in 2002 and could readily tìx them,
a chance to champion "property rights"
during their 2006 campaigns.
The Legislature is now dearly moving
toward restrictions. House Speaker c\!lan
Bense created a special House commit-
tee chaired by his designated successor,
blican Rep. Marco Rubio of Miami.
Senate Judiciary Committee also
took up the issue.
As for Bush, he "feels eminent domain
should be reserved for projects of vital
public importance such as roadways or en-
vironmental restoration," says spokesman
Russel! Schweiss. "He does not feel that
ropriate to take people's homes
r redevelopment purposes."
Crist, governor, also has
enlisted forces of change. Among
se.veral proposals, he would prohibit
eminent domain in redevelopment ex-
cept for "dilapidated and deteriorated"
properties.
through redevelopment. Assembling aH
the parcels is difficult. As fór reselling to
private developers, "why is that such a bad
thing?" Thomas wonders,
Douglas]. Sale of the Panama City re-
development agency told legislators that
cities need eminent domain to deal with
"one or two holdouts" who could block
a redevelopment project. But perhaps, he
said, eminent domain might be used only
for parcels "critical" to a project.
In particular, critics of the Kelo deci-
sion have vilified a $1.2 5 -billion rede-
velopment project in Riviera Beach in
Palm Beach County. The use of eminent
domain there could displace more than
5,000. But Floyd Johnson, head of the
city's redevelopment agency, said Riviera
Beach "should be the poster child for be-
ing proactive." The city is providing ad-
ditional compensation above legal stan-
dards, including relocation services and
various "intangibles," Johnson says. It is
,¡Iso providing assist¡mce for renters and
giving as lTI<my residents and businesses
as possible a chance to move back into the
redeveloped area.
Compensation hasn't gotten much
attention in the legislative debate, even
though Republicans logically might favor
it since it relies on market forces such as
higher prices and better terms instead of
eminent domain to induce sellers into
"voluntary" agreements.
And then there is the position ofJustice
Clarence Thomas th,¡t a taking should be
allowed only for actual "public use" of
the property. Taking people's property is
not just another economic 'sion, like
subsidizing a new business, said,
but is ,111 intrusion on individual citizens
who are being required to sacritÌce for the
public good.
The Legislature is unlikely to go t
bur Thomas' dissent does it
peculiar place of Kelo in
hate over "judicial activism
majority was deferential to a
decision. The dissenters, who
more conservative members of the court,
were the judicial activists pressing for
al restraints. So we not only
William 0. Douglas atnm
saint of economic revival, I Clar-
ence Thomas as a judicial ac
That's a good measure (
cal, legal and sodal com
issue.
The other
There is, 0 course, another side to all
this - the side of the cities and counties
that thrive on redevelopment projects.
"We hope the Legislature will take a
very measured approach to it," says John
Thomas, head of legislative and public
affairs at the Florida League of Cities.
"We don't believe they have to make
wholesale changes." Cities have to "main-
tain quality of life for their citizens, in-
cluding getting rid of slum and blight"
December 2005
Si,we ¡ ".í'}O . ¡{cotl· 1 .
nC7JJ
it
;.V/)i~ Jl
,t/J'{\:'ri l'~F,7cror,'
fidcrncr
wit/}
- ask ll.'; ho'w!
/
FL:\.lì!:"iG lhJ;'-if.\') 1') ,JLi{ :n] !~E:-;')
( )
2 ¡ 5 (\'kb. ,uiun "UfÜ: J 51) . ¡ !(dd.l 7,+7
.(:0;\1
129
Florida Trend
... -,
SO -J '- 'ô,
COUNTY .
f lOR ( D A "
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
Agenda
Friday, November 18, 2005
7:30 a.m., Conference Room # 3
St. Lucie County Roger E. Poitras Administration Annex
1.
January 2006 Strategic Planning Session, ~,.....4ì
Space Needs Study
ß//I c-- - - þz.ø~ //
1..J/7.thd:- ~
þdrd :J- ~ h-- 1- 1
c;, /oJ'.-/:; , #~. .
I~
~;J
.5~¿1~
~
\
jJ¡//JfIJ~ ~ .'
54 ~
Convene meeting
Roll Call, announcements
Minutes
2,
3.
Discussion of additional issues.
Next CBC meeting:
/Yh¿?y{;·' ð.
þ/t-~ -c1
<I ~/ .-.d/¿'\!
VA- d
December 16, 2005 ~ðfl
~Ö·
Adjournment
Draft .-
...
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: August 19, 2005
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:35 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Ron Parrish, Jay L. Mc Bee, Toby Philpart, William "Bill"Casey, Debbie Hawley,
Edward Lounds, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick, Carl Hensley and Steven Messer.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Jacquelene N. Burke, Lillie Miller, Troy Ingersoll and Linda Bartz.
OTHERS PRESENT: Capt. Monahan (Sheriffs Office), Faye Outlaw, Jennifer Hill, Marie Gouin and Doug
Anderson.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
Carl announced Reece Parrish had to resign to this committee. He encouraged CBC members to recommend
candidates for the vacant positions.
MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the June 17, 2005 meeting, Toby moved for approval
and Debbie seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and the motion passed.
Imoact Fees Update
Doug reminded committee members of the ongoing situation with City of Port St. Lucie's (PSL) decision to stop
collecting impact fees for the County. The County's Planing and Zoning Board voted for the County to
proceed with implementing their own impact fees collection process if differences are not worked out. The
City of PSL has issued an ordinance stating they will not allow the County to do so, but staff has checked
with attorneys around the state and believes the County has every right to collect them. Will meet with PSL
once more in another week in hopes to work it out. Will report to CBC on the outcome of such meeting.
There is debt service for the jail that is being paid out of the General Fund, and is to be reimbursed back from
impact fees collected.
Road Impact Fees are intended to be used to widen Midway Road from 25th St. to the Turnpike overpass and
Senator Pruitt is helping to work on a plan to construct an interchange at the Turnpike overpass (Sunpass
only), if there is space to do so, and to replace the bridge (there is a study being preformed for this purpose).
Doug went on to describe other improvement to Midway Road that are very necessary, and stated he cannot
stress enough how critical it is to accomplish these improvements.
Doug also listed other projects that depend on the collection of impact fees, such as the renovation of the Old
Courthouse (damaged by the hurricanes).
Hurricane Report and Financial Recoverv
The new FEMA representative for Florida, Scott Morris, has assured staff that all the claims that have been
put in will be paid. Doug stated getting claims processed is the biggest hurdle.
Doug stated that, at this point, due to these delays in reimbursement, staff is facing a cash flow crunch and
the possibility of having to borrow money (Reserves Fund was depleted with hurricane related expenses). to
get through paying operating expenses for the rest of the Fiscal Year (he clarified this is the first time we've
had such a situation). Staff is checking on the legal possibility of borrowing from other County funds rather
than going to banks, because interest payments are not reimbursed by FEMA.
CBC members and staff discussed FEMA procedures and how they affect the County operations. All five
commissioners are traveling to Washington the first week of October to meet on various issues, such as
Federal Highway Administration Funds and FEMA complications.
"
Stratee:ic Plannine: Session
Doug explained the 2006 Strategic Planing Session (SPS) will consist of, first and foremost, a plan for
financial recovery, in the after math of the hurricanes.
Also, time has come to review the Investment for the Future plan, which consists on a 10 year projection of
the County's capital needs. Staff is working towards presenting this 10 Year Capital Plan at the SPS.
Doug mentioned the TRIM notices, in which PA encourages property owners attend the budget hearings and
voice their opinion on cutting taxes further. Those present discussed this issue.
Ed Lounds expressed his disappointment and frustration in regards to the BOCC not listening to the CBC's
recommendations - Inquired in which way can this committee help and support staff to accomplish their
goals.
Bill Casey agreed in terms of the CBC's unanimous recommendation for the pods, which he is of the opinion,
was completely ignored by the Board.
Doug stated over 50% of the increased revenue (because of the property values) is going directly into
hurricane recovery (not going into operation or capital improvements). He stated we are only putting it
towards getting out of the deficit caused by the hurricane damage.
Carl pointed out it was the Property Appraiser (not BOCC) who sent out the TRIM notices brochure and,
consequently, the verbiage encouraging property owners to dispute the millage rates.
Members also discussed other topics, regarding the differences with City of Port St. Lucie, such as building
other facilities within the city limits, and different alternatives to handle this dispute.
Doug explained how the SPS presentation will be structured, and stated staff is preparing 'decision sheets',
which consist on issues that staff has identified as possible problem areas (projects). Staff will bring to a
future meeting the sheets for review and comments. The decisions sheets layout consist on what is the
opportunity (goal to be accomplished, problem to be solved), how it can be funded, if it is not pursued what
is the penalty (consequences of not solving the problem) and what other areas it will affect.
Staff went over the list attached to the agenda with CBC members and explained some of the alternatives to
resolve the issues. Doug gave Kings Highway as an example, which is a project that is expected to cost over
$130MM in its entirety, but could be built in phases, so that other projects (such as the Research &
Education Park) are not affected by delays in construction.
Future Capital Projects
Doug went over the projects listed in the CBC agenda under item 4, with committee members. These projects
are very necessary and there is no funding allocated for them at this time. Some of them are also affected
by the collection of impact fees discussed in item 1. For more details please refer to the meeting's agenda.
Other issues
Those present also discussed briefly other miscellaneous issues, such as the pros and cons of implementing
a County CRA.
Also, the possibility of implementing an 'Attainable housing' program in the County (This would not be 'low
income housing' it's a plan to build lower price houses (made affordable with government help) in between
houses worth $250,000-$300,000).
Sherift"s bude:et
As discussion of the different projects and county needs progressed, CBC members brought up once more
the matter of the need to resolve the issue of opening the jail pods and cover the needs for law enforcement.
Staff and committee members discussed the matter and several committee members expressed their
frustration as to how this matter is an ongoing problem that has not been resolved.
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
August 19,2005
page 2
Captain Mike Monahan stated he regrets the jail's issue seems to have affected the BOCC's view towards the
Sheriffs operating budget to the point of not funding increases in law enforcement because of the increase
in recent years in the jail's budget, and he wanted to stress to this committee they are two completely
separate operations.
He pleaded for CBC members to lobby with the BOCC, if possible, on their behalf and expressed their
reasoning as to how necessary it is to increase the force's number (he thanked Doug for mentioning the
growth formula, earlier in the conversation).
He stated the County is falling way behind in the law enforcement and public safety aspect of the Sheriffs
operations because this debate has been going on for so long and, meanwhile, we are experiencing this
tremendously fast growth in the County. He reminded CBC members the Board turned down last year's
increases for new positions and there was a grant that the Sheriffs Office could not take advantage of last
year (for 50% of cost of 10 deputies) because they were denied the new positions. He added that we are
setting ourselves to a situation way beyond the jail issue (much more dangerous, in terms of public safety),
because of the lack of officers to cover the whole County.
He added he understands the jail is a big concern to everybody, but the lack of law enforcement officers is
on the verge of a crisis, because it will not be long when they will have to decide on reducing services to the
public (when answering to E911 calls), in order to keep up with the most urgent situations, because 'today'
on any given day, he only has 17 deputies in marked road patrol cars for the whole County (less, if a deputy
calls in sick and they don't have any other to cover, because of scheduling limitations). He also mentioned
other services other law enforcement officers provide, such as security at the courthouse.
He stated they are adding a footnote/comment in every development review (every PUD or DRI), that they
have exhausted their capacity to service any new developments, because they do not count with sufficient
personnel (This is without mentioning homes built individually). They are aware it does not affect the
developments' approval process, but they feel the obligation to make some kind of statement in lieu of the
state of things.
As CBC members inquired ifit covers the whole unincorporated area, Cap. Monahan replied in the affirmative
and reminded those present the proportions of the developments that will soon be approved, such as 100,000
residents in the vicinity of Indrio Road and stated they cannot wait until those family units are occupied to
decide if more deputies should be hired (he urged committee members to plan for the future).
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC regular meeting is scheduled to be held on Friday, September 16, 2005 at 7:30 a.m., in
Conference Room # 3 of the St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 8:45 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
Carl Hensley, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
August 19, 2005
H:IO SecretarylO OMBICBCIMinI08'19,wpd
page 3
Á "
Decision Packages
1 Should the county adopt 1/2 cents sales tax for specific projects for how PFM (Financial Advisor) 14
many years?
2 Roadway Funding Needs Don West 14
3 Should the County negotiate donations of land in West county for Pete Keogh 12
additional regional parks?
4 Should we increase MSTU for stormwater? Don West 12
5 Should the County estimate a growth fee for the unincorporated area to Doug Anderson 11
be paid by the developer for items not covered by impact fees?
6 Could the County Create a Kings Highway CRA Michael Brillhart 11
-,F5' ~-CJ/
7 Could the County create a CRA for Midway road corridor from ~1 to Doug Anderson 10
-turAliihe? Yz. 70
8 Imnat'!t fð~ fer ðll161 ~'Ci11"1 :tl.tfners ( DOIIQ Anderson 10
~
9 Essential Maintenance Projects Roger Shinn 8
10 Funding space needs Roger Shinn 7
G ðð,), tic) .;)
11 Where should the new EOC be located? ~ Jack Southard 7
12 Should the County reinstate indigent health care funding? Beth Ryder 4
13 Where should the historical village be located? Pete Keogh
Topics
Pre parer
Scores
Strategic Planning Topics.xls
St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners
Strategic Planning Session
Draft Strategic Plan 2.0
(Revision Date: November 16,2005)
Introduction
This plan is organized in three sections, Section one presents a number of goals and strategic
choices for the board to consider regarding service and system enhancements or expansions,
Section two presents choices for how the strategic plan can be funded over existing
mechanisms and how the financial health of the county can be maintained, Section three
presents choices about actions involved in the implementation of the plan.
A number of items have been identified by both the BCC and staff. Items already scheduled
for discussion have been placed in a "future events" section as well as some items which can be
handled on an informational basis.
Vision:
St. Lucie County will develop in an environmentally and economically sustainable manner
using innovative growth management, economic development and fiscal management tools to
create compact communities in natural protected settings and technology driven, higher wage
jobs,
Section One:
New or Improved Services and Svstems
Goal: Manage growth and development to produce high quality, sustainable compact
communities
1, Do we want to institute transferable development rights county wide?-Brillhart
2, Do we want to continue to study a regional utility system? - Bowers will walk
around to BOCC.
3. Do we want to consider targeted funding mechanisms and new staffing for large
scale restoration efforts for environmentally sensitive lands? If so, specific funding
mechanisms will be discussed in section two. - Bessey
4. Do we need any additional efforts to protect water quality in the county? What is the
changing role of298 drainage districts with respect to water quality? - West &
Brillhart will walk around to BOCC.
5, Should we continue and strengthen the linkage between development rights and
public benefit? - Outlaw(check list)
See end section for other items that will be discussed in the future
1
Goal: Diversify and strengthen the economic base of the county
1. Should the county continue to facilitate an effort to develop a conference
centerlhotel complex at an appropriate site? - Daum
2. Among the funding tools in use for King's Highway, should the County study the
feasibility of creating a King's Highway CRA? - Brillhart
3. Among the funding tools in use for Midway Road, should the County study the
feasibility of creating a Midway Road CRA (US1 to SR 70).- Anderson
Goal: Support a stronger health and social safety net for county residents
1. Should the county facilitate a community consensus about a health care
district? - Ryder
2. Should the county reinstate indigent health care funding? - Ryder
Goal: Develop and maintain appropriate public facilities
1. Do we want a policy to encourage public private sector partnerships to develop new
public facilities to be developed that would include mixed public-private uses? -
Daum
2. Do we want to increase the maintenance budget for essential maintenance projects?
If so, funding mechanisms will be discussed later. - Shinn
3. Where should the new EOC be located? - Southard
4. Should we purchase lands in unincorporated areas west of the corridors for regional
public parks, libraries other uses for future recreation needs? Should we rely on
donations? - Keogh & Kilmer
5. Does the HOCC confinn the location of the historic village at the fairgrounds?-
Keogh
Section Two: Fundine the Strateeic Plan
Goal: Diversify and strengthen the financial health of the county via alternative
funding sources
1. Do we want to establish a five year goal for reduction in property tax rates with
annual progressive targets? - Gouin
2, Should the county adopt ~ cents sales tax for specific projects for how many years?
3, Should the MSTU fees for stonnwater be increased? - Gouin
4. Should the county estimate a growth fee for the unincorporated area to be paid by
the developer for items not covered by impact fees? - Anderson
5, Should we examine an ESL impact fee implementation? - Bessey
2
Section Three: Implementine: the plan
Goal: Maintain effective internal, inter-governmental and community relations
1, Does the BOCC wish to affirm its existing commitment and practices to
working in partnership with other public entities?
Scheduled discussions and reports
The following items were identified by BOCC or staff and are already scheduled for discussion
or a report is in development, therefore will not need to be discussed at the Strategic Planning
Session,
· Attainable and workforce housing issues will be addressed in a Nov 15th workshop,
If further discussion is needed at the strategic planning workshop it will be
scheduled. - Ryder (Attainable Worliforce Housing Task Force)
· Are we willing to accept payment from developers to pay for increased staffing
resources and compensation dedicated to growth management TVC
implementation? This issue will be addressed in a January workshop, - Outlaw
· Are there any other land preservation strategies the county should consider that does
not always involve county ownership? An information packet on strategies in use
will be delivered to the BOCC, - Bešsey (She's putting packet together)
· A report will be prepared on the county's use of energy efficient practices in its
public facilities. - Shinn
· A report will De prepared on the County's strategy to support a higher education &
continuing education presence as a key component of economic development,-
Daum
· A report will be prepared on how the county's economic development strategy will
support enhanced retail opportunities. - Daum
· Envitonmentã.1Resourcešwî11::h01ëta--~r~~~()p with the_I30CC to discuss standards
that would to encourage "green" or sustainable construction in the county, including
- energy' efficiëhC)C;" Bessey------ ---
· Memo to BãCc with recommendations from staff on start time for public
hearíÍ1gŠ-?::'LJ~----_·
Notes:
Highlighted items were the original items to be discussed with the Board.
3
=".
~
~
~
~
~
~
E
rL1 :
=~
~~
Z =".
O~
~ ~
rL1 .~
rL1 ~
~~
~$
~~
o ...
U~
>~
E- ~
Z~
~~
O~
U~
~~
O§.
~
~ t=
-< ::.~
Oa~
== ~~
'S~
~ ~ .==
II"""'-...
t..... :: ==
L'" ~ ==
Z~~
~ I .~
O~te
U ......
'. ~
~~
~ ~~
~~\Q
U~~
~==èo
~ .~ ~
.~ ::
E-~==
rL1~~
-
~
=
o
"C
~
~
o
....
r:I.2
"C
~
~
=
....
=
-=
~
-
þ
..
=
=
....
I-
o
c..
c..
o
-
~
~ ~
~ ..t::> I:::S
..t::>~ ~ ~
~~8~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ .... ~ 0
:... :... '-
I:::S I:::S ~ .....
~ ..... 0 ~
I:::S ~ .....
~ k ~ ~
::::::: ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
'tV:)"''''
o ~ ~ ~
~ :... ~.9
~ '- .....
~ t)":: ~
'- ~ ~ :...
~ .b ¡;;;: ~
~ ~ 0 ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~~~ 8
o ~ ~ ~
'" ~ ~
"'.....~o
~ ~ ~ '-
1:::S~0"'¿;
~ ~ ~ ~
..t::> :... ~ ~
~ ~ ~
..;.:;:..~:...
~ 0 ~
~ \J .;:::
~_=:..t::>
'" I:::S ~ ~
~ ~"'t:::s ~
~ 0 ~ :...
I:::S ~ ~~
~ ~~"'t:::s
..t::> '_ ~ ~
o ?-. :... I:::S
..... ;:.. ~-
~~~~
~ ~ ~ .;:;
~ ,ò~
..... ~ ~ ~
I:::S .9 ~ I:::S
..::~o ~
~ ~ ~
~ 0 .... :...
~ ~ .... ~
~..s:: ~ .....
.~......- g
~ ~ ~ .b
~6~~
&..s:: 0 ~
..... ~ ;:.. E"
~ ..... ~ '-
~ ~..s:: .....
o =: ..... ~
=:~.s-t:
I:::S :......... 1::;
- ~ ~ ~
,~ 0 ;:.. 0
.....C()o~
~ :... "'t:::s
S ~ ~ ~
~~E3"1:::S
~ 0 I...- ~
~ ~.~ I:::S
-
I:::S r.oj ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~~
I:::S ~ ~ ~
..s:: ~ ~ ~
::... ~ ~ I:::S
.....' ~ ~
~ ~ c {._
~o '-..,
o ..s::........ 0
u.....:........
.....O"'t:::s
~~II')~
~=:c~
~
.
~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~ ~
- ..s::
~.....~
o~..::
g~~
I:::S .0 't
~ .:::: I:::S
~~~
"'t:::s ~
~ r"'\ .
I:::S C' ~
-ò~ ~
~.....~
I:::S ~"c
~ ""<J C'.;
~ ~ :...
..::~~
:... I:::S 0
~~ ~
"'t:::s 0.9
~.....:::::::
~ ~ '-
~ ~ =:
~.5 ~
~~~
1:::S8~
"'¿; ..... ..è>
..s:: I:::S ~
..... ..s:: .....
..... I:::S
~ ~ =:
~ ~.-
,~~ ~
o ~ :...
~~~
~ ~ I:::S
.~ ~~
~~~
~..:: ~
~ ~ ~
~~b()
..::~~
:... '1:3 ~
~ I:::S 0
~ 0 ~
~.....~
~ ~.....
~..t::> ~
..... I:::S ~
~ ~-
,~..t::> ~
~::::::: .....
~.- ~
~~~
~-ò:...~
~ ~ ~ ~
.~ 6 II') .~
o r \ . ~
:... '-J C ~
~ ~ ~ 0
_..:: ....0
':';::: ~ I:::S
~ÔS:~
~ ~ ¡;;;:
~-=:o
I:::S~ .....~
- :...~
- r.oj I:::S ~
~~~~=:
~ ~ .~ '1:3 8
~ ~ .~ ~~
o ~ :... ~ ~
~~~O~
:...~O~...
~
"'t:::s I:::S
~ ~
I:::S~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~
..... ~ '-
o ~ ~
~ .~ :...
~ .b :...
'"' ~ ~
i:S~0
-ò] ~
§ :... ~
o~.~
\j ~ (
~ ,~ ~
..:: .~ ~
~ ~ ~
o....¡ ~ I:::S
:... ~
, 0 ~
~ ~~
I:::S 0 I:::S
~ ~"'t:::s
I:::S 0 ~
o ~ ~
:.;,~~
:... .....0
o '
'-.. =: .....
I:::S' ~-
~ - ~
¡;;;:..t::> ~
:...~§
6 ~"6
~.~~
~ ~ 0
=: ~~
o I:::S I:::S
~ ~
"'t:::s I:::S È'
§ ~ =:
~~~
~ I:::S '--'
~-ò
~~~
;:.... I:::S ~
:...' ~ .....
~I:::S~
~ -... ~
~ -.::: ..s::
_~O"'"
~ ~..t::> ~
= ~ ~ '-
o .~ ~ "'t:::s
- 0 ~
~.~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~.~
,-E~~
.; C/,) ~ ~
~ ~ I:::S 0
~ ~ 0 ~
~ ~ :... ~
= ~ ~..t::>
cr·5 ~ .....
~""'..s::..s::
r:I.2~""'C/,)
= 0 '-
o ~ ~~ =:
u -ò ~ -ò
- ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
þf) r~ I:::S 0
='-J ou
~ ~ :...
=..s::~~
= ..... ~..s::
-= ~.....
u ~ 'ß ,5
.
-
"C
~
l-
..
=
cr
~
=:
....
=
~
e
....
r:I.2
~
~
=
~
-
....
r:I.2
o
U
.
.~
-
..t::>
~
~
~
..::
~
8
~
~
~
I
c
c
c
c:::5
c
........
~
-
þ
..
=
=
....
I-
o
c..
c..
o
r:I.2
..
-=
....
....
~
~
e
o
....
I-
~
"C
I-
o
=
..
=
~
.a
~
~
.s
=
o
..
....
~
=
"C
~
r:I.2
o
c..
o
I-
~
-
=
o
..
....
=
-
o
00
.~
.~ ~
~~ "'~
.....c ,
~ c ~
~ C'.; .....
_ I:::S
I:::S .....~ :...
~ ~ ~
~ b().....
~ ~ ~
~~~
~ =: ~
~ ~.....
..s:: .... ~
..... .... ~
~ ~ t
~ ~ ~
o ~ ~
~:... ~
._ ~..s::
..s::.....
~ ..... 0
:... ~:::
~.- ~
:.;:, ;:.. ~
'"' I:::S ~
"'..s:: I
~ b()~
¡",,;¡~-
'~ I:::S
~ ~ .5
't ~ ..::::
~ ¡;;;: -
V:)=:~
~ 0 I:::S
:... ~ ~
~ ~ I:::S
t) :...
~ .~ b()
.b - ~
~~~
~~ I:::S
~ ,~
..... =: .....
~~<s-,
~ "'t:::s ~
=: ~ ~
~ ~ ~
:... :.....t::>
~~~
6 ~..::
\J~~
~._ 0
~ ~ ,~
o ,ò-
....:¡~"'§
~ ~ ~
..s:: 0 '"
..... ~ '"
b()1:::S"::
.5 ~ ~
....... .,..... ......
~ I:::S
~ ~ ~
=:~~
~ 0 ~
g.. ;:.. 0
=: ?-......
.-..t::> ~
b() ~ ..::
~ ~ ....
'- ;:.. ....
~ 0 0
o :... =:
~ ~.~
~ I:::S ~
~ ~ ~
I:::S 1::; ~
~ ~ ;:..
~ =: 's<>
.
rJj
=
~
z
o
~
rJj
rJj
~
~
~
o
u
~
~
z
~
o
u
~
0.;
~~
= ~::
<~ .S
0:: 5
=~~
~i'~
~ z·....
t..... ~ ::
E:"""'" ~ ::
Z~~
Q::~
~ I .~
O~ ....
=tt~
U·· ;
~ ...
~~~
~~\Q
u~~
~::t.
~.s ~
.~ :::
~ ~ ::
rJj~~
-
~
=
Q
"C
~
.c
Q
.....
~
"C
~
~
=
.....
~
.c
~
--
è
.-
=
=
.....
...
Q
Q.,
Q.,
o
.
~
z:::
~
z:::
~
.....
~
~
';::-'
~
-
,s
.§.
u
~
-€
\:S
o
~
:...
~
~
~
~
o
~
~
~
z:::
~
~
~
.....
z:::
~
~
o
~
~
~
~
~
oJ:::
.~
::t:
~
z:::
~
~~
\:S
~
~
{
~
.....
~
~
~
]
-
~
z:::
'-
.t:~
~
.&
ct
~
'-
z:::
~
~
- ~
~ -€
Q \:S
"C 0
..... ~
Q :...
c: ~
.- -
,s
.§.
u
~
~
~
=
~
=
=-
~
~
=
Q
U
--
·s
:::::::
~
t:
o
~
~
~
~~
z::: \:S
~~
~
þ!)
=
~
-
-
~
.c
U
.
§ z::: z::: z:::
'_ .0 0 z::: ....
::::::: ...::: ~ ·9 .;:;
. ,... '::: ':::: :::::: :::::
~ ~ ~ '- '-
"ì ~ ~
.......~:5~"ì
~~.......!"r)!"r)
: :~~::::
. . .~
~
~
\:S
~ :............
. .......
o ........... rÄ
z::: '-.J
'- ~ '"
6~Þo..)
~ ~.9
.9~~
.....~~...........
- ~~ ?-.
"C ~~~ ~
.~ V'j ~^ ~ :t:
= ~ ~~ ~
=- "ì '- ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~"::
~ ~ r-:¡~ ~
\:S~~.9
o ~ "ì
~ :... ~O\
~~ ~~
~ooJ:::
~~~~
..... ~ ~.9
~ ~.S ~
~~~~
:-
:,s
~~
.....
=
~
e
.....
~
~
>
=
-
--
.....
~
Q
U
.
-
è
.-
=
=
.....
...
Q
Q.,
Q.,
Q
~
.-
.c
.....
.....
~
~
e
Q
.....
...
~
"C
...
Q
=
.-
=
12
~
.....
~
.c
Q
.....
=
Q
.-
.....
~
~
"C
~
~
Q
Q.,
Q
...
~
--
=
Q
.-
.....
=
-
Q
00
~
~
r-:¡
~
r53
.....
z:::
ð
~
~
~
:...
~
~
~
~
~
.:::
r-:¡
~
~
~
.....
z:::
~
~
E
~
~
c3
-
\:S
~
o
~
.
~. ~f
~ \,)
\:S
a ~
~ ~
.....
f::I ~
:s:::
·s ~f
te
... ~
1A -..
:s::: ~
r:IJ. . ~ c
=.::: \,)
.... ~
~~ ~
, ~
z~ c ~
~ ~
o~ ,
~ ..... ~
~~ ~
r:IJ.§ ~ ~
~ =: \:S
~ð ~ r..o;¡ ~
~ -..
~¡ ~ r..o;¡ - ~
, r..o;¡ è
~ ~ .c
~~ .- ~
~ =
] =
0.5 ~ .... ,
~ ... ~
\:S 0
ul \,) Q., \,)
oS ~ ~ Q., \:S
~ ~ 0 I
~~ ~
fIJ ~
~ .- -..
~~ ~ .c
.... -..
z:s::: ;::$ \:S
-.. r..o;¡ ....
~.~ \,) ~ ~ .=:
.::: ~ ~ -
f::I '- ~ E ~
o~ ,£ '- ~
=: '- S =: ~
u~ .....~ ~ =: , ~
~ ~ =: ... ~ ~
..... ~ ~
~.f::I =: ~ E! "CI -ò ;::.
.::: ~ ~ ~ ... ~ e
o~ 0 ;::$
'"" , ~ = ð ~
~ ~ ~
~~:s::: - .-
-
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = '-
= = -ò J ..... -..
~ ~
0 -ò~ 0 ~ ~ ~
-< §.s "CI "CI S '-
~ ~ ;::$ ~ ~
oð ~ ~ ;::$ \,) .... ð ~ ~..s:::
.c 0 '- \,)
ð.~ ;::. .c '- \,)
= ~..... ,
=~~ .s ~ ~ e - 0 ~\:S~
'S~ ..... ~ .- ~ "CI ....
fIJ r..o;¡ ;::: ~ ~ ~~~
~~ .5 "CI ~ =: fIJ \,) ~ ~ ~ =
~ ... ~ § §
~~ :s::: ~ CJ ~ ~ .- ~ 0
~ = .-
~ :s::: = , § = ~ \:S ..s::: .... ~ 5<>..t::)
~ ~ cr CJ
z~~ .... ~\,) = ~ ;::$~ ~ ~ = § ~ ~
= c ~ ~ ~
~"'\::$ cr '- ~ \:S ;::$ "CI ._ \:S .c
~ I .~ .c ~ § ~ .~'~ ~ .... ~ ~ ..... .;::
~ fIJ = ..... fIJ \:S ~ \:S
o~ ... = 0 ~ ;::$ C()
~te '-' ~~ 0 6"~ ~ ~ \:S Q., C -"'-
.ò~ E ~ ~~~
U '. -; è u ,~,£ ;::$ f
~ ~ ~ È3 '-' ~C-Ò .... -.. ~ ~ c
~~~ .- fIJ ~ =-- ..... -..
= ,~ ~ ~ ~ -ò.- ~ .\:S ~ \:S
= Þ.Ð ~ '-'
~~\Q .... ' -.. = ~.::::':'::: = ..... = ~ ~ ~
... ~~ ~ C \:S..t::) .... ~ 0
u~~ 0 - , ;::$ \:S '-' .- ~ ~ ~
Q., ~,9 - ÇJ ~~ .... , .... ~~~
~ ~ Q., = fIJ ~ =
~~ .c 0 -
~.~ ~ 0 u 0
~ " u Vl
.~ ::s
~~:s:::
r:IJ.~~ . . . .
:...
~
~
~
c
~
~
c ~
.J::: ~
~ c
§-
~ ~
~ -?
\:S
~ .c
~ :S
..... '-
00 ~ ~ ~
c
= "-> 0..
'"\:S ::::= ~
~ '-
~ '- ~
z ~ ~
~ .~ ~
0 -
'"\:S ~ ~
~ \:S ~
00 c ~c::; ~
~ ~~ ~
00 ~ ~~
~ '- ~ ~~ ~~ .
~". ~ ~~ - - ~
:;;) ~ ~('.:¡ .t- '- ~
c -~ .- ~ '-
'-
~~ ..... .s~ = 00.....
~ ~ c c = ~ ~
.... ........~
o~ ~ ..... ~ J.
§- .~ ~ 0 ~.....
u... - \:S C. c::; \:S
~ ~ ~ c. ~e
>~ ,9 '"\:S 0
~ ::::= ~ fIJ ~a
~: '- ~ .-
~ ~ -= ~c:Q
ZË ~ ....
:... lI') ~ .... ~ ~
~~ .E ~ ~ ~ ~~
~
~ ~~ e 'S
O~ '"\:S ~ \:S
~ .s ~
\:S ~:§ ~'"\:S
U:;;) J. ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~~ "-> ~~ "'C ~ ,~
~ J.
O~ .~ . ~
t - ~ 0 ~ ~
~ c =
~ ~.J::: .- .E ~
~ ~ :: - - - ~...t:)
~ ~ .s \:S =
= = ':::: :... ~ C().E
0 0 '- ~~ ~
< ~ .S "'C ~ "'C §- ~ ~ ~
~ ....
O~ ~ ~ ~ .... "-> .:d ~ ~ \:S
·S ~ .c - 0 ~ - ~ .c ~~
'- = '-
=~~ .s ~ .. \:S - ~ 0 ~ ~
: ~ ~ .- ~ "'C :... ....
fIJ fIJ ~ ~ ~ = ~~
>~ .S "'C ~ ~ ~ J. 'C \:S 0
~ ~ (oJ .- c::; :...~
~= :: ~ = ~ .-
= .E ....
~ :: = ~ c:r .E ~ (oJ ~ .S
Z-=:~ .... :... = ~ ~ :... ~ \:S ~
r"j~ ~ ~ c:r ·S ~ ~c "'C ~ ~
~ I .~ -= ~ ~ .... ~ ~ ~ ~
~ fIJ - = ~ fIJ
O~ ~ = -
~ ~ ~ 'S 0 :... :...
-- ~ 0 c. .E "->
~~ e ~
U·· ~ .t- u :... :... e í.fj . S
.... ~
~ .... .- .E -- C fIJ ~ ~ ~-
~ :t~ = ~ .J::: ~ ~ ~.s
= ~ ~ ~ > --
~~'C .... ~ = ~ = ~ :... = ~ ~
~ ~
U~~ J. ª ~ .... ~ 0 ~
0 - :.s -- .- ~
c.. - .... ~~ .... ~ ~
~::~ ~ ~ fIJ =
C. "-> -= &: 0 "->........ - "-> "->
0 ~ U ~~ 0
~ ·S '= U rJ:J. ~ ·S
.~ :s
~~::
oo~~ . . . .
t
~
'i
~
~
'S
~
:s
~
~
~
~
oo,s
=~
~~
z~
O~
~~
oo~
ooe.
~a
~.s
~~
O-š
u...
~
~~
~~
Z..;: e-...
..... ~
~i ~
..., ~ r~
Oç3::
U~ ~
~~t
~-...¡
O.Š ~
.....~
~~~
~~
:t: ~ :t:
< == ~.S
Oð ~ t
~~ ~~
~..;: :t: "'..
..... ~ ~
~:s E .S
t......==~:t:
t"""'" ~.-= :t:
Z-=:...~
~c;,j~~
..., I .~
O~ ....
~ ~
U 0. ~
~ ...
~~ ~
~~ \Q
~ ~
U~ ~
~:t: ~
~.S ~
.~ ==
~~ :t:
OO~ ~
-
~
=
Q
"0
~
.c
Q
....
~
"0
~
~
=
....
~
.c
~
--
t;-
.-
=
=
....
...
Q
Q.
Q.
o
.
.Q
s:
~
ð
~
.::
~
~
~
~
s:
~
'-
.....
E
~
&
ì:':s
~
~
~
'-.)
s:
'-
~
~
è
~
.9
~
~
~
s:
.....
s:
~
æ::
§-
-
~
~
~
~
~
.....
~
-
~
=
Q
"0
....
Q
=
c..
.-
-
~
.~
ð~
c;..:¡ s:
~ ~ '
..... ~
- ....
~ ,9 ~
~ ..... '-.)
;;. .~ ~
~ g ~
?-,~.::
:::::: ~
~ ~ ~
'- '-.) æ::
'-.) ~ ~
s: ~ c;..:¡
~ 6 ~
<;; '-.) ~
~ .9 ~
~ H
t ~ ~
'- ~
~ .Q
c;..:¡ ~ ~
~ .... ~
~~ ~
~ ~ ~
..c:, c;..:¡ ~
è~ ~
æ:: ~ ,§
...........~.....
, c;..:¡..s:::
~ ~ '-.)
~ 0 ~
~~~ ~
~ ~ ~
cSð~
~c;..:¡ ~_
~........ ~
~a ~
~"- 0
~ 6" ~
~ s: ~
~ ,9 ~
~Þ:~
~ ~ ~
~ 0........
Q",s:Q",
. ~ ~
,~ 0::: s:
-::..~<;;
.Q~ ~
s: c;..:¡ '-
~ ~ ~
r~ ~ 0
"""~::::::
~ .....~
.:: ~
r"\ ~
~ ~ ~
~, ~
~...... ~
s:~~
f§~~
~ ~ ~
c;..:¡~~
~ ~ ~
~ 0 ~
~ '-.) c;..:¡
..... ..... 0
~ 0 '-.)
..... s: b()
~ ~ ,5
'- '-.) .....
~,~ E
~ ~ ~
~ Q", §-
~
~
(J
=
~
=
C"
~
~
=
Q
U
--
~
~
=
~
-
-
~
.c
U
.
-
"0
~
...
.-
=
C"
~
~
....
=
~
e
....
~
~
;;.
=
..
--
....
~
Q
U
o
o
o
Ó
M
N
Ó
M
EA
.
...
t:/.)
o
U
C+-.
o
'$.
0"1
N
*
tjOO......O
OOONOgg
U O~O~M~qo 0
æOol.O<o::toó
~O"IOI.O"""OM
......... r---~ "'!, N <o::t.- N N
"";"~NEAONÓ
V)T77EA NEAM
EA EA
- ~
'- ~
~ ~
~ ~~
'_ s: ~.....
~.9 ........
'_..... ~ .0_
~ '- ,
~,~ ~ ~
~ ~ b() 5 .~
~~.~~§
S:~E~æ::
~s:~~æ::
s~&~ð
-
t;-
.-
=
=
....
...
Q
Q.
Q.
o
~
.-
.c
....
....
~
~
æ
Q
....
...
~
"0
...
Q
=
.-
=
1à
~
....
~
.c
Q
....
=
Q
.-
....
(J
=
"C
~
C'I.)
Q
Q.,
Q
...
~
--
=
Q
.-
....
=
-
o
rJ:J.
-
~
~
~
~
~
~
Q",
-
~
,s:
k:
~
~
.æ::
.;::
.....
~
':'\3
~
~
..c:,
.9
~
~
.5
Ë
~
~
~
..c:,
.9
.....
s:
~
o
æ::
~
~
~
.::
~
o
cj
~
s:
~
-
o
~
~
~
.~
.....
~
.
~.
~
~
~
00 ....
~~
~ ~
z~
01í
~ ;:¡.
oo~
oo~
~~
~.'È'
~ §
O~
ua
>~
~~
z .~
~=x::
O~
U .=
~
~~
O~
~è
~ Q=
~ =.~
~ :: ~
oa~
== ~~
> -s.~
t.....~=
r"""'I :: =
Z ~~
~U~
I ~
'--
o'C~
U =tt: .....
~~
~ ~ t'.5
~~'C
u~~
~=~
~ .~ ~
·fO ::
~ ~ =
00 = ~
-
~
=
o
"0
~
.c
o
-
rIJ
"0
~
~
=
-
~
-=
~
--
þ
....
=
=
-
a..
o
Q.,
Q.,
o
t: - ~
æ ~ §
~ ~ '-
.::: .:t:: ......
~~:.s
...c \,) t:
'- 0
\3 Š(¡ \,)
~ \3 ,~ .~
\3~~...t:
'- 0 ......
...... :... t: :...
~~8~
\3 '- ~ :...
..... ~ _ 0
-\3...t:
~ ~...c~
t: 0..9 \3
,,g ~ C() ~
\3 0.0 t: ~
~ t: æ ~
~ '- ~ \3
~ § ~ ~
',,::: 0 ê
~ 'r;; ~ ~
t: ~ ~
...t:~~~
~"""'-J~
\3 ,~ § ~
~ '-:'"
~\3"""\3
~ ~ ~ ~
- \3~t:
...... ._ .0
I t: ~ .:::::
~ § ~
6'\1;;: \,) ~
~ ]-.5 ~
...t: ~
,~~ ~~
::t:~..9...t:
~ 0 I:.,)
t.o:J :... t: :...
~ .........t: ~
. ~^ \,) ~
..::: ""-I ~ ~
~:"'-I:.I::::
\3'"\3
~ ..... t: .~
';'S . ~ \3 \,)
~~§~
o '-,
...... r~
...... ,\3..,~
t: ~ \,) '"\3
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ t3
~ ~ ~ ~
..9~...t:t>
~ ~
~ ~~~
~ ~ ~ ~
a_~
~'"\3~~
t:.2~
t:\3~~~
~~.~~~
~ 0 Š(¡~ \3
'è>.1:.I::::\3t:~
...:::;. \3"
.~~;~~
~,.g~.t::..9
IS" \,) ~ '- ~
:... ~ \,) ~
~~]'"\3~
..s: ~ \3 t: ~
..... -......; _ \3 :...
.
~ ,~ t:
';'S :... ·9
...... ~ t3
~ 'b ,[0
~ ~~
9..'- ~
~ ~ ~
'- 0 ~
'"\3...t:U
t: ~
\3 - ~
t: "§ ';'S
~~o.o
~~.5
.9 \3 ~
:... :...:
~oš..
~......~
f::::~o
'- Ò
~:t5 ~
.~ '"\3 ~
t: t: '-
\3 \3 ~
·5 ~ ~
k.~~
......~...t:
~ ~ .....
~ ~ ~
~ ...... ,t:
:... ~ ~
\,) ~ -
~ ~ ~
~~~
Eo:::; ~ .9
~ \3 ......
'_ ~ t:
~ :... .s
o \3 -
:... ~ ~
~~ ~
.9 8
~ ~ \3
o t: ~
~ ~ '::
~ ~ ...t:
\3 6 .9
~:...;::...
'"\3 ~ ~.
~ '- ~ \3
:... ~ ~
.~ ~ ~ \3
"\:$ ~ ~ ~
~~~þ.o
...t: .t:: '- -
..... ~ .s:s
~\3~-
'- ~ ~
~ . ~
~.- ~ ~
u]ð]-
\3f}o~
~ \,) ..... ~
è-~~
t: \3 '-
.9 ~ t: .~
..... .........
~~.s';'S
.... \,) :... :...
r~ ~ ~ 0
-......; t: ~~
-
~
=
o
"0
-
o
=
c.-
....
~
t:
~
~
...c
......
o
t:
::::::
'~
\3
~
\3
,~
..š
:...
~
~
~
~
t:
~
.2
\,)
~
.t::
~
~
~
'-
~
~
~
~
'-
t:
t:
~
~
:...
~
§-
d::
rIJ
~
CJ
=
~
=
0"
~
rIJ
=
o
U
--
~
þf)
=
~
-
-
~
-=
U
.
-
"0
~
a..
....
=
0"
~
~
-
=
~
e
-
rIJ
~
>
=
..
--
-
rIJ
o
U
.
{-
~
......
~
ò
'-
-
'-
...c
'-
~
~
~
~
:...
~
'"\3
~
~
~
t:
~
...c
::::::
.~
~
~
~
~~
~
~
-
þ
....
=
=
-
a..
o
Q.,
Q.,
o
rIJ
.-
-=
-
-
~
~
e
o
-
a..
~
"0
a..
o
=
.-
=
~
~
-
~
.c
o
-
=
o
....
-
CJ
~
"0
~
rIJ
o
Q.,
o
a..
=-
--
=
o
.-
-
=
-
o
00.
....:
t:
~
o
\,)
I:.,)
\3
~
ê
~
~
:...
~
~
'"\3
~
~
o
e-
o
\,)
t:
'-
t:
~
~
o
~
-è
.2
~
Ò
'-
-
'-
...c
'~
~
~
';'S
'"\3
t:
~
.
1:\..
~
~
~
a..;
~~
=~
~~
z~
oe
~f
~~
~~
~.....
~t:
~a
01
U~
>~
E-t~
Z~
þ~
o
U~
~e:s
O~
~
~~
==-è'o::
~ :: .~
~:::C""
Oa ~
=~~
> -s .~
t..... :s ::
I:""""":::C ::
Z~~
UQ;;;
Þ I .~
0...........
:;t: ~
U·· -;
~ ,..,
~ft~
~~'C
U~~
Þ::~
~ .S e:s
.~ :::c
E-t ~ ::
~~~
.-
~
=
Q
"C
~
.c
Q
-
fIl
"C
~
~
=
-
œ
.c
~
--
.è
.-
=
=
-
r..
Q
C.
C.
o
~ ~ c
,'>.) ~ .....
'- :...
;::. ~ ~
E ~ ,S!
~~~
.E ~
~ . c
c ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ,~
~ ;::. ~
~ c c
"'\:$ :... .....
~~è>
'- '- ~
~ ~ ~
~ :.;, ~
~ ~ ~
~....~~
~ ~ ~ -
,~ ~ ,~ ::
~~~ ~
r\~ ,,SS
'-J '_ ~ _
~-~ ....
~,§u ~
~ 9.. ~
c~.E~
'- ~ '"
~ è> ~~
r~ ~ 'E ~
'-J ~ '- '>.)
~ ,S! ~
. ~ :...
~ ~ ~.~
'- ~ ~~
~ ~.s ~
J~ .... ~ ~
["0; .... ._ ~
~ ~ t3 ,9
~~b()~
.E ~ ·5 !':
~ ~,~
....... ~ ~ ~
Ý'.) '- c ~
:::S"'\:$~
~§~~
E~~'-J
~ ~ ~ ~
~~§~
~.E~~
~ :... '-
c~c~
~ ~ ~ ~
~~.~~
~ - ""
~ ~~ c
~.~] .è
;::. ~ ~ ':';:::
c ~ ~
:.;, ~ ~ '-
~ k:..:! ~
"-o.;¡....~~
"'\:$ ~ ~ ~
~~~~
C Ii;;: ....
~ ~ ~ ~
?-. ~ ~ .5
~ ~ ~ ~
;;. ....:...
~~~~
~E-:;:;~~
.
.-
~
=
Q
"C
-
Q
=
c...
.-
fIl
~
CJ
=
~
=
C'"
~
fIl
=
Q
U
--
~
~
=
~
-
-
œ
.c
U
.
~
~
,S!
&
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
C
~
~
~
~
~
;::.
~
~
~
E
~
.-
"C
~
r..
.-
=
C'"
~
~
-
=
~
E
-
fIl
~
...
=
.....
--
-
fIl
Q
U
.
~
~
....
~
~
'-
-
'-
~
'§
~
~
~
:...
~
"'\:$
~
~
~
~
~
~
:::::::
'~
c
c
c
c~
"':t-
~
.-
.è
.-
=
=
-
r..
Q
C.
C.
Q
fIl
.-
.c
-
-
~
~
E
S
r..
~
"C
r..
Q
=
.-
=
~
.a
~
.c
Q
-
=
Q
.-
-
CJ
œ
"C
~
fIl
Q
C.
E
=--
--
=
Q
..
-
=
Õ
00.
...;
~
~
C
~
~
~
t
~
~
~
~
"'\:$
~
E
C
e.
C
~
~
'-
~
~
~
C
~
~
.2
~
~
'-
-
'-
~
'-
~
~
~
~
"'\:$
~
~
.
r:I'J
~
~
z
o
~
r:I'J
r:I'J
~
~
~
o
u
>
~
z".
~~
O~
~
u~
~èo
O~
~te
~~ =:
< ... .S:
O~~
~~
=~ ~
> 't .5
~ ~ =:
zl~
~ I .~
O QQ ...
~~
U·· -;
~ r-.
~ ft~
~~~
U~~
~=:~
~ .S: ~
.~ ==
~ ~ =:
r:I'J~~
-.
~
=
o
"0
~
.Q
.s
~
"0
~
~
=
....
co
.c
~
--
þ
.-
=
=
....
....
o
c.
c.
o
.
Þb
s:::
....
~
....
;::s
...C)
~
s:::
~
o
.....
s:::
~
~
~
~
c3
b()
·5
.....
.~
~
s:::
~
¡,,;,
c:s
...!:::
;..
~
~
s:::
c:s
¢
s:::
;::s
8
~
"5
.s:::
~
'~
~
~
.......
~
~
~
s:::
~
;..
~
~
.......
c:s
s:::
o
'...
.....
~
c:s
"è>
s:::
.0
,¡::
~
;::s
~
~
8
-.
~
=
o
"0
....
o
=
c..
.-
~
~ ~
~ "::f
~ ~ ~
~~~
~ ~ c:s
~ ~ ~
t c:s
~~"è>
o~.....
~ ~ ~
,.è.. r-:¡ ;:..
..............~
g 0 ~
.....~"5
s::: ~
~r-:¡~
~ ~
..... "5 ~
o :.;:
s:::"è>~
~ ~
;.. ~...!:::
c:s.... r-:¡
~ s::: r-:¡
.... ~ c:s
:::: §- "'c:s
.... ~ ~
~ ;.. r-:¡
~ ~ ;::s
..... "5 è
~ t-:¡ s:::
~ è ~
~-c:s
~ ~ ,
..S!~ ~~
& ~ "5 ~
.- .......
" c:s s::: ~
~.......~...!:::
~...!::: r-:¡
~ s::: ~.......
~ c:s c:s
.:::: r-:¡ ~ s:::
~ .~ r-:¡ ·9
~.~ o.~
':';::: ~~
~ ~ ~ ~
S:::~~r-:¡
~ ~ ò c:s
~ ~ .... .......
~ _.... s::: ~
~-.::;::S~
r...' 0 ~ ;::s
-.¡ ..... ~ ~
~ ~ 8 ...C)
"'c:s c:s ;.. .9
~ ~ ~ "'c:s
~ ~ "5 ~
~ 0 ~
...C) t-:¡ ;.. s:::
~ 0.......
.9~:5~
'" c:s ~ r-:¡
.... ~ ~ ~
~ t-:¡ ~--
.... ~ ;::s
..... s::: ~ 0
s::: .......C) ~
8~~.:::
::::: ;::s ;::s 0
.......C) 0 0
~....... ~...!:::
.:::8~~
8 ~ ~ ~
...!::: r-:¡ ~ ;..
~ "è>~ ~
~
~
CJ
=
~
=
c::"
~
~
=
o
U
--
~
þJ
=
~
-
-
co
.c
U
.
-.
"0
~
....
.-
=
c::"
~
~
....
=
~
e
....
~
~
¡¡.
=
~
....
~
o
U
.~
;..
~
.......
~
~
~
s:::
~
~
~
s:::
c:s
"è>
.....
~
~
~
~
c:s
~
'...
.....
~
~
~
.
~
~
~
~~
~
~
r"\j ~
~
~
~
~
~~
~
~
r"\j ~
~
1/
.....
o
~
~
g
~
;..
~
~
~
r"\j
~
~
.....
~
~
~
c:s
;::s
~
~
~
~
~~
~
00
=:
~
z
o
1-1
00
00
1-1
~
~
o
u
>
~
z
~
o
u~
.~
~~
o~
~
~i ~
<= .S
O .... ~
~ ~
=e~
";~
>.':: .S
~~¡
7~~
~~~
~ I .I:J
O c:I'\ ...
~~
U·· -;
~ ~
~~~
I-I~\C)
U~~
~&:~
~.S ~
.~ :3
~ I:J &:
oo~~
-
~
=
o
"C
~
.c
o
.....
rIl
"C
~
~
=
.....
~
..c
~
--
è
.-
=
=
.....
...
o
c.
c.
o
~ :...
::::: ~ ·9
~ ~ ~
~ ~.....
~ ~ H
~ ~ ~
~~~
~ ~ ~
c~~~
~ & c
~ :... :...
~~~
6oC} c ~
.s: E ~
c " ~
c ~ ~
c ~ ~
c~ ~ ~
c ~.5
C~~
... -,... .......
..... ..... ~
6oC}~..c::>
~~C()
c ~.~
~ "'J ~
r;.:¡.5 ~
~~~
~ -- ...s:
~~r;.:¡
~ -ò ~~
:... ~ C
~ .... '-
..... .........
r~ ð ~
...... c ~
~1;->~~
~ ~ ~ ~~
:... ·9 ~ ~
c.....tJ~
~~~~
..... c & ~
~~_tJ
~ ~ - ~
¡¡;: :... ~ ~
........... ~ &
~ ~ r;.:¡ :...
~ ~ ~:...
~ ~ ~ C
tJ ~ ~
,::; ~ ~ :...
~ ~ ~ ~
-:;:~~~
- ~ tJ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ '- ~ ?>..
~ ~ ~ tJ
~ ~ ~ ~
,5 ~.5 ~
c ..... :... ~
..... :... ~ ~
r;.:¡~6~
~ ~ tJ ~~
~ ~ :... ~
~ ~ g '-
~~t;-~
tJ :... -""-
'- ~ ~~ ~
~ -..c::>
:...~ ~~
~ ~ ~ c
_~~b()
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ tJ ._
..... r;.:¡ ~ .....
~ ~ ~.5
ð~~~
.
-
~
=
o
"C
.....
o
=
~
.-
~
~
~
tJ
:::::
.~
t
~
.....
·5
,...s:
~ .~
.9 ...s:
..... ~
~
~ r;.:¡
c b()
~ ~
~ '-
:...~
~':';::
~ ~
~..c::>
~ ~
tJ~
~
~1;->
~ r;.:¡
~ ~
'_ c
~ '';::
~ ~
~ c
'- ~
..... ~
~
~~
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
"--~ ~
&~
..!o<~
tJ
~ ,~
~ -
~
.s: ~
~ ~
~~
~ .~
..... -
~~
c ·5
. - ...s:
:... ~
~..c::>
~ ~
c ~ '
..... :... r;.:¡
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~.....-
'- ~..c::>
~ C() E
c::::: f"\
tJ '- -
:::::~-ò
....... ~ .......
~ ~ ~
~ .tJ ~
~ E~
'- ~ :...
~ ~.-
-:;:::-~
~ ~ :...
..c::> .b c
~ ~.g
~ð~
rIl
~
CJ
=
~
=
cr
~
rIl
=
o
U
--
~
þf)
=
~
-
-
~
..c
U
.
-
"C
~
...
.-
=
cr
~
cz=
.....
=
~
E
.....
rIl
~
¡¡;.
=
....
--
.....
rIl
o
U
.
.s:
~
~
.....
'-
.....
~
...s:
~
...s:
.~
-
~
C
tJ
tJ
~
~
~
~
.g
.....
r;.:¡
~
'-.
r--...
0\
0\
.....
~
'-
~
.~
.....
~
r;.:¡
c
c
c
c~
c
c
..... ~
6oC}
~
~
~
~
~
~
~
.~
~
~
-
.g
c
c
c
c~
c
c
.....~
6oC}
~
1;->
~
ª
tJ
~
'-
~
~
-
è
.-
=
=
.....
...
o
c.
c.
o
rIl
.-
..c
.....
.....
~
~
E
.s
...
~
"C
...
o
=
.-
=
~
~
.....
~
.c
o
.....
=
o
.-
.....
CJ
~
"C
~
rIl
o
C.
o
...
~
--
=
o
.-
.....
=
-
o
00
.
00
~
~
z
o
~
00
00
~
~
o
u
>
~
z
~
o
u
~
o~
~~ z:
~ ~.~
~I:::I""
o~~
~ r~
=~-..¡
~.S ~
~~ .....
~z:z:
z~~
~~ .~
o~ te
u~ ~
~~~
~~\Q
u~~
~z:~
~.s 1:::1
.~ :::
~ ~ z:
OO~~
....
~ t.o:)
~ 8
·5 ~
.... '-
\:s ....
~ E
.... ~
] §-
\:s ~
.§ ~
~ ~
t.o:).:.e
\:s ;::š
~-
t.o:) ~
~ ·5
~
'~
r)5
-
E
....
~
ð
-
~
=
Q
"0
~
.Q
Q
.....
~
"0
~
~
=
.....
~
.::
~
--
þ
..
=
=
.....
I.
Q
Co
Co
o
....
c
~
~~
c
'-
....
~
;::š
.!:::
t.o:)
~
~ 8
~ ~
':::-, <:¡)
e ~
~,5
~ ~
,9 c
.~ .:.:::
~':';:::
~ ~
t-...
~c:5
'- 00
~~
'~~
...t:) <:¡)
"'\:s....
~ ~
\:s ._
~ Èi
'- :.;,
t ~
;::š \:s
.!::: "'\:s §
~ <:¡) '';::
c <:¡) ~
~ ~ ;::š
~.9 ~
~ ~ §
, '- ~
~~ ~
"'\:s <:¡) ~
~, ~
~~ ~
.9 ~ ~
~
~ ~ ' ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ;::.... ~ "'\:s
.è~~~
~ ~':'::::¡ ~
;::š ~ ;::š .s
c;:......t:)....
Ü ~ ~ \:s
~ k ~ ~
~~'&~
.
........"
....;
t.o:)
'-
-
-
~
=
Q
"0
.....
Q
=
c..
..
~
.~
~
~
~
\:s
~ ....
~ \:s
c~
,~
;::š '_
C ~
.9 ~
"'\:s ~
~..9
\:s \:s
.è '~
~ ~
;::š ~
c .!:::
Ü t.o:)
.~ 1:
~ c
;::š ~
~"'\:s
~ §
'&.è
~ :~
~t ::::::
6'~ .~
~ e ~
....~ ,
~ & c
~~ ~
.9 ~ ~
....... ;::š
~ \:s r~
.~ ~ '-I
¡: '- <:¡)
~.::::: ~
t.o:) ;::š ,
~ ~ ~ .9
~,~?-.
~::::::.~ ~
'- '- ;::š t.o:)
;:... ~ ~ c
et.o:)....~
~~..9 ~
~~\:sc
.;: ,~ ~
"'~~t.o:)
"'\:s <:¡) ~.-
·5 1 ~ 15
~ c ~.-
~, ~
...t:) ~ ~ ~
, ' ~
~ ~ '- ~~
~ c ~ ~
, '- '-'
~~;::šf}
~c...t:)....
~,,~ ~ ~
'oJ<,J<:¡)....,
;:::...t:)~c
- - ..... .....
~ ':';::: ~ ~
.è ~ ·9 6
~ ~ ~ ~
;::š ""J:';'_
8 ~.9 ':';:::
- ' ~
~ '- ~ ~
~~~~
~
~
~
=
~
=
=-
~
rI:I
=
Q
U
--
~
þ!)
=
~
-
-
~
.::
U
.
~
'-
,
'-
~
<:¡)
~
<:¡)
~
.9
~
\:s
~
~
~
~
~
~
\:s
~
~
~
~
'-
"'\:s
~
;::š
~
~
...t:)
....
~
'~
.:::
-
;::š
t.o:)
~
....
\:s
~
~
~
;::š
-
~
~
'-
....
c
~
~
~
.t.o:)
~
-
"0
~
I.
..
=
C"
~
~
~
c
'-
::::::
.~
t-...
c:5
00
~
~
~
\:s
~
'§
,
~
\:s
~
~
~
::::::
'~
~
~
~
~~
~~
.....
=
~
5
.....
~
~
~
=
....
--
.....
~
Q
U
.
-
þ
·c
=
.....
I.
Q
Co
Co
Q
~
..
.::
.....
.....
~
~
5
Q
.....
I.
~
"0
I.
Q
=
..
=
~
.a
~
.Q
Q
.....
=
Q
..
.....
CJ
~
"0
~
~
Q
Co
Q
I.
=-
--
=
Q
..
.....
=
-
Q
rJ.J.
~
~
~
':::-,
e
~
~
c
'-
....
~
;::š
.!:::
~
c
~
<:¡)
~
'&
~
~
c
t.o:)
~
.~
..e.
~
~
....
~
,~
~
....
\:s
~
~
k' ...t:)
\:$ ..S!
~ '~
~ \:s
......
c55 ~
~ ~
ð 0()
I '
~ ~
'-- ~
c
~ ..9
~ ~
~ ~
~ ]-
-= ~
~ ~
.!::: ~
t.o:) <:¡)
E ~
~ ;::š
~ c
.... ' ~
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
E .... \:s
~ ~ c3
c ~ ~
e,,~~
~ ~ ~
~ .~ ;:...
C \:s ~
~~"""'"
.
\I'l
=
~
z
o
~
\I'l
\I'l
~
~
~
o
u
>~.
~~
Z~
a
Þ.s
o~
u~
~Q
o~
~
~~ ..
< ~ .S:
0....... ~
:: ~
~~~
IIIIIIi
.........~~
~ ... .....
t......~=:
[""""'~ =:
z~.;:
h I a;;;
~~ .~
o~ te
U .. -;
~ "'"
~~~
~1i'C
u~~
Þ=:~
~ .S: r:s
.~ ::
~ ~ =:
\I'l~~
-
~
=
=
"C
~
.Q
.s
rIJ
"C
~
~
=
....
~
-=
~
--
~
.....
=
=
....
a..
=
C.
C.
o
G>
:.:
~ ~
:.: ~
·9 ~
~~
~ .....
&~
?--.t
~ ~
:.: ~
~ ~
~~
~ .....
~ ~
~ ~
:.: ~ ~
\:S \:S ~
~~ .....
C ~~ ~
:.: "ß .~
,9 :.: "\3
..... C \:S
~~~
.f::: ~ C
~......... .....
:.: ..... :.:
C ~ ~
~ \:S ;:.
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
..... -.... ~
,~ .....
~.5 ,5
~"ß~
.~ .~ .~
\:S :.:
:.:~~
C :.: \:S
~ ~ .....
~ '- :.:
~ t ~
~ ~ ~
c~§
..... ~ "\3
~
~ ' ~
~"ß"ß
~ "'\:S ~
:.: :.: ~
~ \:S ;::::
~ ~~
:.: .... ' C
·9 :.: .....
~ ~ ~
.~ r~ .....
~ '-J \:S
~ ~ š-
c"ß~
Cj ~ ~
-è> ~ ,5
:.: ..... ,
5 ~ ~
u ~ ~
~~Cj
~~~
\:S ,9
C '.....
~ ~ E
~ :.: ~
~d&
.
-
~
=
=
"C
....
=
=
c..
.....
.....
~ :.:
=:::::.:~
\:S .9 Q,.
~ ..... ,
..... \:S ~
~, ~
:~&~ ~
~ ?--.~~
.E ~ ",
:.:....:::: c.o
~ ~ ~ ,5
:.;,':<:~
C ~ \:S
:.: r~ ~ -..
'- ~ ~ Q,.
~~~G>
~~"ß~
c.o~ ~ ~
:.:.....~~
.~ ~.~ ~
:.: 'sæ .~ ~
~..C)~~
Q,. C '-
.E ..... ~
G>~ ~~
~ ~ 6.........
þ.o '- ~ ~
,~......~
~~ ~.....
~ ;:::: ~
~ ~ C ~
~ ~ ~ ~
~ § -è> ~
~ .~ § ~
~.~ C ~
.........~u~
~ ~ ~ ~
"ßC~Cj
~u..... ~
C ~~ So:
~ ~ :.: ,.g
,~ ;:::: ~ \:S
C". C :.;,
~ u c.o ~
c~,5~
,c:,:""-J
~ "'\:S So: ?--.
:.:'~~
dgQ,.~
~ ~ G> ~
:.: ~ So: ~
..g "ß ~ ~
E~~~
~ ,~~.
~~~~
a,~So:
G> ~ ~ 8
:.: \:$ ~ ~
~ ~ I ~
~~ ~ \:S
~ ,~ ~ ~
r.... ~ "ß \:S
~-..~~
~.c ~ "'\:S
~ --e '- So:
..... ~ ~ \:S
c.o :.;, '- ~
,5 :.: ,~
~ ~ ~ :.;,
':'::::c:.:~
~..Qd~
rIJ
~
CJ
=
~
=
c::r
~
rIJ
=
=
u
--
~
þJ)
=
~
-
-
~
-=
u
.
-
"C
~
a..
.....
=
c::r
~
~
....
=
~
E
....
rIJ
~
~
=
....
--
....
rIJ
=
U
.
~
~
-..
~
:.:
c
'-
=::::
'-
~
'0
~
,
~
;:.
c
.~
.....
~
c
~
~
~
-
~
·æ
=
....
a..
=
C.
C.
=
rIJ
.....
-=
....
....
~
~
E
=
....
a..
~
"C
a..
=
=
.....
=
12
.!
~
.Q
=
....
=
=
.....
....
CJ
~
"C
~
rIJ
=
c.
E
=-
--
=
=
.....
....
=
-
=
00.
~
"ß
:.:
c
~
:.:
~
~
'-
:.:
:.:
~
Q,.
G>
:.:
~
~
~
~
~
.~
I
~
.........
~
"ß
~
~
'-
~
;::::
c
,
~
:.:
~
~
~
;£
..... ~
8 ~
..9~
]~
\:S :.:
~ ·9
:.;;, .~
\:S ~
N '-
~Q
-.. ~
\:S"ß
~
'- c
~.....
..,9.....
c ~
~ :.:
E-è>
:.: ~
~ §-
c ,
~ ~
=::::~
\:S :.:
~ ;::::
~~
. - þ.()
..... ,
~~
.
00
~
~
z
o
~
001:\..
oo~
~.....
~1
~~
O~
u~
~
~~
~~
~.....
~5
~.~
0:=
U~
~~
0·5
~
§t..
<~ ·s
Ou c,¡
~ ~
=~~
"'" ~ ~
~~ .....
~~~
Z~~
~ I ~
O~ .~
~~
U~~
'. 1:::1
~ r-.
~~~
~~'Q
U~~
~=:~
~.S 1:::1
.~ :::
~~=:
OO~~
-
~
=
o
"C
~
.Q
o
.....
rIJ
"C
~
~
=
.....
~
.c
~
--
,è
.-
=
=
.....
10.
o
Q.,
Q.,
o
ò ~
s:: ::;
::s~. .... 10" ~
C ~ 8 ::s 10"
l)::C;~~~
~ \:$ ,..,
.... "':! ~~-
\,) '- Co --., '"
::s ~ \:$ ~ ~
~~Io,,~-§
r';:i ~ ~ \,) s::
-~ 10" c..... \:$
~c\,)8¡¡:
c¡:~~~
~c\:$~~
-. 's:: -t: ¡;;;: c;:s
t'-.. ~ ..... ~
~. "':! ~ ~ ë
~s::c;:..s::
~~~~~
c"" ~ ~ ~ ~
00 .- r:: c ~
. -t: C".....
~\,)~¡¡:~
~~~~~
c \,) ~ ~ ¡¡:
~~Io,,~\:$
s:: .- C ~
'- \:$ ~ \:$ c
s::,:::!~~ 10"
.9 ~ c _~ ~
.....~ -.....
~~ ~ò~
t; ~ ~ 5 .~
.... s:: s:: .... "':!
.5 \:$ ~ r~ ï::
¡¡:~~"-J\')
~ 10" ~ ~ .....
~ 8 ~'~ ~
~~-t:::s~
~ ~ .~~ ::s
u~~~~
-t: ~ '" 10"
.::::: ~ ~ i2 ~
\:$ ~~ \:$ ~
~ ¡::¡;: ::s ~ "':!
........ t;;;:.... \:$
~ ~~ È'~
~ \:$ ..... \:$ 10"
G>~~¡¡:~
s:: ;:.. c.o 10" §
~^ C s:: r? c
...... \,) ........... \,)
~ ~~ s::
..... 10" 10" .....; ~
is \:$ C <;;
._ \,) ~ ~ ò
~~~~§
Et: ~ ~ ~ r~
'-- ~ \,) ~ "-J
6' -t: s:: .::: ~
~~~~~
\:$ ~ s::
c;:s~~~~
~ \:$ .... ~ ~
-t: -t: È' "':! ...
.....Ö\'\:$;,s::c
10" ..........0.-
~ t:::. 5 ~ G:
~ "'1 -t: ....
~ "'to.,;::: 6.5
\,)~~Io,,"'"
-§ I') s:: ~.È
s:: 'C C '"
C ~.... ..... "Î
\,) C ~~ s::
...,. ~,..... ~ ~
"6' Õ() ::s \:$ ,!;::!
::S\:$§-S::'';:::
t; ~ ~ ::s \,)
\:$ ~ ~ .~ ~
C 10" .... 10,,::: ~
.....~;..~c.o~
c.o~ ... ?-..:;:: ::s
S::S::\:$.S1~s::
'-::s ~ '-
~ "':!.~ ¡¡: ~ ~
c':::::~~§8
\,) ::s ~ ~ \,) "':!
\,) ~ -t: -t: s:: ....
""<: \:$ ..... ..... .- ~
.
-
~
=
o
"C
.....
o
=
I..,
.-
"':!
¡¡:
~ C
~ ~
- ~ ?\
~ ~ ~
~§~
s:: ~
.....; ~ ¡¡:
s:: 10" ~
~::S~
s~ ~
\:$ ~ "':!
~ '_ ::s
.:.: è 10"
..... ~ ~
\:$ "':! §-
.:::!~ 10"
~s::~
~\:$~
¡¡: ..... '-
\:$
è>'~ ~
\:$s::.....
~ ~ .
~~~
~ 10" ~
s:: '- -t:
"':! ..s:s .....
"':! ~.....
~ ::s ~
\,) s:: ,"':!_
\:$ \:$
C "':! .....
..... ~ s::
"':! "':! ~
~ ::s ¡¡:
~ 8 è'
5 .~~
~ ~ C
10" s::
~ ~ .9
~~~
~ ~ 't
\:$ 6' ~
-t:~~
..... \,) ~
C 10" ~
S::;::S-t:
C C .....
~~~
~'~ s::
'" -t: ~
~- ;:..
'- "':! ~
~'~ ~ ~
._ C ',,:: s::
~C\:$C
~ 10" ~ è>
~G>~~
\:$S::~~
\,) ~ ~ 10"
~ ~ ~~
è>¡¡:t;~
~ ~ ;::s '-
~~ ¡¡: ~
::s'';:::~ .....
~ ~,';::: ~
\:$c~\:$
......-t:c\,)
~~-t:-t:
-t: .....
.t::.....~~
s:: -:- ~ ~
~~ -t:
~~~~
~~ct;
10" C C c
~1:::1o,,\,)
c~G-~
~ ~ s:: ~
'" 5::" ~ "':!
?-,¡;;;: ~~
s:: 8 ~ ~
~ ~ ~ \:$
-<ooQ~\,)
rIJ
~
CJ
=
~
=
=-
~
rIJ
=
o
U
--
~
t)J)
=
~
-
-
~
.c
U
.
-
"C
~
10.
.-
=
=-
~
=:
.....
~~ ~
\:$ ~ ~ ~
~~ ò ~ ~ g
'_ \,) s:: 10" -t: -.
~~5~~1o"
¿,c.o\,)Š § ~
"':! .5~ -
'- ~ '" . .....:¡' ~
~c~g~~
~::::::cc~-t:
~ J;I 10" c' -.....:.. .....
.....--.,cc.....1o"
~~~I') ~~
.-..... c ~ ~ s::
~~g~~,9
~ s:: Ir) ~ p.~
::s t'-.. 10" ~ ;:..
't ~~ \:$ ;:.. C
~ C "':! \,) C 1=:;
':::-, ..... .- Ò Q." ......
~ ~ 'C s::..... s::
~..... ~ ::s \:$ ~
~ ::s r~ C ~..g
..:::: c....... \,) ~ I
.- ~ 10" ~ ~ ~
~ ¡¡:~'- t:i:. s::
\:$ \:$ ~ 10" ~ ~
~1o,,~J;I-t:~
;:.. "'-....... --.,.....
cë"~t;~\:$
Io"Io"C'O~c~
~~~ ::s~~
\:$ ~ ~ ~~ 6
c.....~1o"1')1o,,
::; s:: ,~ ~ -. ~
~~~~~-t:
,5 ..... ::s ::s.S1 .:::!
~ ~. 8 ::: ~ 1
~ ~ ~ \:$ ..... "':!
..... ;;:.... ¡¡: '- "':! .....
~..... c ,';::: ::s._
~ 8 "':! ,5 ; ~
~~.è~¡¡:~
~~~~8~
.....-t:~"':!_'"
~, ..... "':! ,.., ..... \,)
.... 10" ::s '" - s::
~ ~.~ §- ~ .~
~ ~ "'^ 10" C-t:
..... ~ šË' ~-t: .....
::s ~._ ~ ~ "':!
~ s:: .......... ~ '-
~ ~^::s ~
~. ~ ~ c ~ ~
,§ ~.È ~ ~ ~
::;~~~~~
'- 10" c..... .....
~\:$~"':!æt~
~~~~~~
......... . 0() \:$
~¿,~.t::CIo"
~~¡¡:s::1=:;è()
\:$ "':! "':! ~ ...... c
'::::: c·- '- ~ 1=:;
\:$-t:-t:"':!...........
;:.. ..... ..... ~.- .....
\:$ s:: s:: 10" ~.S1
..... ~ c Ò c '-
C -t: '- s:: -t: ~
s::~:æ::s?\~
,~ ~ è Uc \,) ~
. 5::" s:: "':! s:: 10"
~\:$.....Io,,~J;I
.....~~<.9Io,,--.,.
~~¡;;;:--.,~~~
c .......,:: ~ ¡¡: ;:.. ~
~8§-~~~~
~.S1~...::ò~~
~~-t:\:$§¡¡:c
~~.....,';:::CCI')
~~ë~\,)~-.
c ~ s:: c ~.- ~
"':!....."':!-t:c~'"
::s '- ..... -t: ~
~ C "':! G- ::s ..... ::s
..... \,);,s:: s:: c ~ ~
"':! ~..... ~..... ~ s::
8::s~~~~\:$
~ c '- ~ t ::s ....:
~§~~~~~
.....
=
~
ë
.....
rIJ
~
>
=
~
--
.....
rIJ
o
U
.
00
=
~
z
o
~
00
00
~
~
~
o
u
~
~
z
~
o
u
~
o
~ ==
-< .S
O ~
~~
==~
........ oS .==
~ .... ...
~ =: ==
Z r~ §
'i'~
~o ~ o~
~~
U ·0 ~
~.. ....
~~
C:S~\Q
U ~~
~=;;~
~ o§ ~
o~ ::
~ ~ ==
00 ~ ~
-
þ
.-
=
=
1::
o
c..
c..
o
rIJ
.-
0:
......
......
~
~
=
.s
...
~
"0
...
o
=
.-
=
12
"
......
~
.c
o
......
=
o
.-
......
CJ
"
"0
~
rIJ
o
c..
e
~
--
=
o
.-
......
=
Õ
rJ:J.
~~
~............
Io..!:, -s::
~ § ~ ~
~ ~ 1:: 10..'
10.. s:: C ~
~~-.....
~~~~
~~~Cj
,~ 10.. ~
~~S::~
~~~~
.Q ':: s:: ¡;:
s::~¿,~
~ ~- ~
8~¡;:C()
'-- ..... ~ s::
&.~ s:: ~
..... 10.. ~ ~
~..... -
c .:::: ~ \,J
10.. Q ~ ,5
~ ~ ~ ~
~ ._ c ~
~~~~
10.. ~ ~ '_
~..... ~ ~
10.. s:: ~ ~
~~ 0' \,J
.........~ s:: Io..-S::
~ ~~
~..... ~
U~C~
;:t:-..;>~-s::
-...:..~ ~~
t s:: ~ §
~ ~ .".:::~
.Q ~ ,§ :s¡
'- s:: _ ~
];~~C
'_ "^ \,J
~ - ~.....
s:: ¡;: ._ ~
c~~-s::
~ s:: s:: :::
~ ~ ~ \,J
c::a:: Cj ¡;; ',£
~ ~.5·::::
~""'~Q
Cj ., ~ C()
~~ ~.5
13 ~ § t~
~""'\,J,"""
..... ~ ~
..... ~ 10.. ~
s:: "^ ~ ~
~ ~.- Cj
~]~~
\,J ~ ~ 13
~ ~ , ~
-s::.....~..,..
..... s:: ~.....
¡:; ~ '':;: ~
~~.::::~ c,j
':: ~ ~ s:: ~
~~~ ~c
'5 ~ ~ ~
-s::c....;s::
..... - \,J'_ §
~ ~.¡:: ~ '':;:
~~,~~..s!
~~Q~~
~ -s:: C() ~ §-
~~,5 f} ~
.Q~ ~ 10.. ~
s:: E-:;~c
~. c ~
8 ~ ~ ~ ~
~~~~~
._~ s::~~
s:: ~ ~ ~
~~&.Q~
~ 10.. 1""\':'::: s::
:æ.Q......:.c:;~
..... s:: ~ '- ..c
'':;: ~ ~ ~:::::::
;::a c s:: c '-
...::::;Cj~~~
.
00
=
~
z
o
~
00
00
~
~
~
o~
u~
a
~.s
~~
z-:
þ~
O=---
~
u-a
rT.·~
~;::
O~
.~
~~ =
-< ~ .::
0..... ~
=c ~
=~~
~~~
~ a.. ....
~~::
~~ ::
~ I ~
~~ .~
o~ ~
u ~ '!
~~~
~~'Q
u~~
Þ::~
~ .:: ~
.~ =c
~ ~ ::
OO~~
--
~
=
Q
"C
~
,.Q
Q
....
rI.I
"C
~
~
=
....
=
.c
~
-
þ
.....
=
=
....
...
Q
Q.,
Q.,
o
.
~
~
::::::
:::
:...
~
~
~
.c
~
-
\:$
,~
:...
..9
.C;o:
~
~C;o:
.è
~
~
8
:...
~
~
,c
.-:::
\:$
'->
..9
.'->
~
~
~
.....
C;o:
~
.....
~
~
~
--
~
=
Q
"C
....
Q
=
c.-
.....
~
~
(
~
~
~
~
~
,S¡
:...
§-
:... .....
~C5
\:$-
..... ~
c '->
~ ~
~
I:¡¡ '-
~~
.-::;: ~
~ ~
~'?
- c
~ I
~~
.::: ~
~ \:$
.~~
~-
\:$ \:$
~
~C;o: c
.è ',-:::
~ 8
~ ~
8~
I I
rI.I
~
I:J
=
~
=
=-
~
rI.I
=
Q
U
-
~
~
=
~
-
-
=
.c
U
.
-
"C
~
...
.....
=
=-
~
~
....
=
~
e
....
rI.I
~
~
=
-
-
.....
rI.I
Q
U
.
~
~
.~
~
~
{i
~
..(:)
~
--
þ
.....
=
=
....
...
Q
Q.,
Q.,
Q
rI.I
.....
.c
....
....
~
~
e
Q
....
...
~
"C
...
Q
=
.....
=
~
.a
~
,.Q
.s
=
Q
.....
....
I:J
=
"C
~
rI.I
Q
Q.,
Q
...
~
-
=
Q
.....
....
=
-
Q
rI1
~
.c
.-:::
,S¡
'->
c
~
~
.:...
~
~
..s
:...
~
~
~
\:$
&
:...
~
~
~
~
:...
~
C;o:
~
~ ~
~ ~
,\:$ ~
~ c
~ ~
~ ,~
..s ~ ~
~..s
~ ~.....
~ \:$
~ .~]
'-> r~ 8
..9 ~.....
- :... ..::=
~ ~~
- r \ ~
\:$ '-' \:$ C
~r\"'" ~
'- '-' ~ ;~
·~c- :...
:... \:$ C
C ~,~ ~
,5 ~ .ð ~
~.....\:$~
~ ..,. ~ ~
{.- -~ ~ ~
.~ ...... \3'<
~ ~.5 ~
~6..9C;o:
::...~æ::
\:$ ~ ~ ~
~\:$:...~
~~~
.-:: ~ ~]
VjJ\:$~~
.
~y -k.. FIn.
«W0
~ ·~.~I/
jJ¿, )fb
] ì> A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO, 01-95
WHICH AMENDED THE INVESTMENT POLICY FOR ST,
LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; BY FURTHER AMENDING THE
INVESTMENT POLICY
RESOLUTION NO, 05-378
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made
the following determinations:
1. Pursuant to Section 218.415, Florida Statutes, on or before October 1, 1995,
counties that have custody of public funds in excess of the amounts needed to meet current
expenses who elect to conduct investment activity themselves rather than depositing these
funds in the Local Government Surplus Funds Trust Fund for investment by the State Board
of Administration, are required to conduct such investment activity in accordance with a
written investment plan and an investment policy adopted by the Board of County
Commissioners or in the alternative to invest in specified low-risk instruments.
2. On September 26, 1995, the Board adopted Resolution No. 95-168 which
adopted an investment policy as recommended by the Investment Subcommittee ot the St.
Lucie County Citizens Budget Review Committee,
3. On December 6,1995, the Investment Committee recommended that the Board
adopt certain amendments to the investment policy; and on January 2, 1996, the Board
adopted Resolution No. 95-275 which amended the investment policy and incorporated the
recommended changes of the Investment Committee.
4. On December 3,1997, the Investment Committee recommended that the Board
adopt certain amendments to the investment policy and on December 16, 1997, the Board
adopted Resolution No. 97-190 which amended the investment policy and incorporated the
recommended changes of the Investment Committee.
5. On April 4, 2001, the Investment Committee recommended that the Board
adopt certain amendments to the investment policy, and on April 24, 2001, the Board adopted
Resolution 01-95 which amended the investment policy and incorporated the recommended
changes of the Investment Committee,
6. On September 21, 2005, the Investment Committee recommended that the
Board adopt certain changes to the investment policy, which amendments are attached as
Exhibit "A".
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St.
Lucie County, Florida:
1. This Board does hereby adopt the amendments to the investment policy
attached hereto and made a part hereof as Exhibit "A", pursuant to Section 218.415, Florida
Statutes.
2. Except as amended herein, the remaining terms and conditions of Resolution No.
01-95, as amended, shall remain in full force and effect.
3. This resolution shall take effect on adoption.
After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows:
Chairperson Frannie Hutchinson AYE
Vice Chairman Doug Coward AYE
Commissioner Paula Lewis AYE
Commissioner Joseph E. Smith AYE
Commissioner Chris Craft AYE
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 11th day of October, 2005,
ATTEST:
ERS
)
/
/ -
APPROVE~TO FORM AND
CORRE TN :
BY:
EXHIBIT "A"
ST, LUCIE COUNTY
INVESTMENT POLICY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. SCOP E ...,.....,.,.,.,...,.....,...,.....,...........................'..............'........,.' ,...,.,..,....,....................,.,...........,.1
II. INVESTMENT "........ .,.,.. ..... .,... ...'.. ..,.,.,..,..o.. ..,. .....,..".,... ,..... .,.".,......,."...... .... .,... .,.,.".,.,....,.... ..1
III. INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE AND REPORTING ..........,......................................,..,.. 1,2
IV, PRUDENCE AND ETHICAL STANDARDS ..,..............,..........,..............,..................,..,.........2
V. A UTHORIZED INVESTMENTS ..,...... .............,.......... ....,......'......,.., .......... .............. .....' 2,3,4
VI. MA TURITY AND LIQUIDITY REQUIREMENTS .................;..........,.............................4,5
VII. PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION .......... .....,.........'........... .........,......,............ ..............,..,..... 5,6,7
VIII. RIS K AND DIVERSIFICATION ,....'......,..,......,.......... ,.... ................. ..,....,.................,........ 7,8
IX. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENT INSTITUTIONS AND DEALERS .....................,..,.......8
X. THIRD PARTY CUSTODIAL AGREEMENTS .................................,....,............,............,..8,9
XI. MAS TER REPURCHA SE AGREEMENT ,.. ..,......,............,........,............. ......,............... ........... 9
XII. BID REQUIREMENTS ..............,..,.. ................ .....,...... ........................... ....... .... ............. ...... 9,10
XIII. INTERNAL CONTROLS .... ....,..,...............,.. .......,....... ...,..... ................ ......................... 10,11,12
I, SCOPE
This investment policy applies to all surplus funds held by or for the benefit of the
St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners, hereinafter referred to as the County,
These policies were adopted using Sections 125,31 and 218.415, Florida Statutes.
Bond proceeds may be further limited or expanded by their respective bond resolutions or
covenants and shall not be considered to be in conflict with the Investment Policy.
II, INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES
The County shall strive to achieve with each investment opportunity, the following
objectives, in ORDER OF PRIORITY:
1. SAFETY - The primary objective of the County's investment activities is the
protection of investment capital.
2, LIQUIDITY - The County's investment strategy will provide sufficient
liquidity such that cash flow requirements are met through the utilization of
marketable securities with structured maturities.
3. INVESTMENT INCOME - In investing public funds, the County will strive to
maximize the return on the portfolio but will minimize investment risk.
III, INVESTMENT PERFORMANCE AND REPORTING
A portfolio report shall be prepared each mORth Quarter by the Finance Director or
designated staff member.. and be provided to the Clerk of the Circuit Court and
appropriate management staff. The report will also be made available to the Board of
County Commissioners. The report shall include a breakdown of the portfolio as well as its
overall performance and the current market pricing at month-end.
A detailed analysis of the investment portfolio will be prepared by the Finance
Director and presented to the Board of County Commissioners on a quarterly basis. The
report shall include information relating to transactions, market values, performance and
adherence to policy. The Clerk of Court is authorized to utilize an investment accounting
service to obtain necessary information. The Board of County Commissioners will conduct
an annual meeting to review the investment portfolio and evaluate the investment policy.
Strucl( through words and passages are delei=ed. Underlined words and passages are added.
- 1 -
The Board of County Commissioners will appoint an Investment Committee that will
serve in an advisory capacity and report to the Board of County Commissioners. Each
Commissioner will select one of the five Investment Committee members who will possess
relevant financial experience. The Investment Committee will rely on the Clerk of the
Court, Finance Director, and their staff for support, The Investment Committee and the
Board of County Commissioners shall receive a copy of the portfolio pricing analysis
prepared by the third party service and shall also receive copies of all transaction advices
prepared by approved brokers,
The Clerk of the Circuit Court shall be notified immediately upon exceptions from
currently approved investment policies by the Finance Director.
In the event of an emergency situation requiring noncompliance with policy
guidelines, the Finance Director shall attempt to schedule a special committee meeting to
discuss the proposed action. If a special committee meeting is not possible due to time
constraints or scheduling problems, the Finance Director shall individually notify a minimum
of three committee members to obtain approval of the proposed action,
IV, PRUDENCE AND ETHICAL STANDARDS
The "prudent person" standard shall be used in the management of the overall
investment portfolio,
The Finance Director, and other persons performing the investment function, shall
act as a "prudent person" in accordance with these written policies and procedures,
exercising due diligence and investing in investments authorized by law,
The "prudent person" standard is herewith understood to mean the following:
Investment shall be made with judgment and care, under circumstances then prevailing,
which persons of prudence, discretion, and intelligence exercise in the management of
their own affairs, not for speculation, but for investment, considering the probable safety
of their capital as well as the probable income to be derived.
V, AUTHORIZED INVESTMENTS
The Clerk of the Court acting through the Finance Director, or other designee of
the Clerk's office, shall purchase or sell investment securities at prevailing market rates"
with a preference to par bonds or those at a discount, Authorized instruments are as
follows:
Strucl< through words and passages are delet-ed. Underlined words and passages are added.
- 2 -
A. The Local Government Surplus Funds Trust Fund, the State Investment Pool
administered by the State Board of Administration, also known as S.B.A,
B. The Florida Cour'ltics Il'Ivestl'Rcl'lt Trust Florida Local Government Investment
Trust, also known as the F,C.I.T. F.L.G.I.T, administered by the Florida Association of
Court Clerks and Comptrollers and the Florida Association of Counties.
C. Negotiable direct obligations of, or obligations the principal and interest of
which are unconditionally guaranteed by, the United States Government. Such securities
will include, but not be limited to, the following:
1. Treasury Bills
2. Treasury Notes
3. Treasury Bonds
D. Bonds, debentures, notes or other evidence of indebtedness issued or
guaranteed by United States agencies provided such obligations are backed by the full
faith and credit of the United States Government, Such securities will include, but not be
limited to, the following:
1. Farmers Home Administration
2. Fcderal Fil'lGl'lcil'lg Bal'll(
3. Fcdcral HousiRg Adl'Ril'listratiel'l Dcbcl'lturcs
4; g. Government National Mortgage Association (GNMA)
E. Bonds, debentures, notes ef. or other evidence of indebtedness issued or
guaranteed by United States Government agencies (Federal Instrumentalities) which are
not full faith and credit agencies limited to the following:
1. Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB)
2, Federal Home Loan Bank or its district banks (FHLB)
3. Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA)
4. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (Freddie-Macs)
5. Studel'lt Leal'l Marl(etin~ Asseciatiel'l (Sallic Mac)
F. Non-negotiable interest-bearing time certificates of deposit, money market
accounts or savings accounts in banks/savings and loan associations organized under the
laws of the United States, doing business and situated in this state, provided that any
such deposits are secured by the Florida Security for Public Deposits Act, Chapter 280,
Florida Statutes.
Strucl( through words and passages are delei:ed. Underlined words and passages are added.
- 3 -
G. Repurchase agreements collateralized by Treasury Bills or Notes having a
maturity of two (2) years or less (tRc ul'1derl)'il'1~ securitics fer purchasc and subsequel'1t
salc) for any of tRc il'lvcstmel'1ts authorized abovc il'l itcms C, D and E,
Investment in derivative products is not authorized.
IV , MATURITY AND LIQUIDITY REQUIREMENTS
To the extent possible, an attempt will be made to match investment maturities
with known cash needs and anticipated cash flow requirements. Investments, including
investment pools, of current operating funds shall have maturities of up to tRrcc (3) ,¡cars
five (5) years. The Finance Director and other persons performing the investment
function will provide an appropriate mix of maturities to maximize the return on the
portfolio while minimizing investment risk. II'1vcstmel'1t of bOl'ld rcser'/es, cOl'1structiol'l
fUl'1ds, al'ld othcr 1'101'1 aperatil'19 fUl'1ds shall havc a tcrm apprapriatc to the I'1ced for fUl'lds,
al'1d il'l accordal'1ce witR dcbt cO'/Cl'1al'1ts, but shall I'1at e)(cecd five (5) years, ul'1lcss
pcrmitted by thc tcrms af tRe bOl'1d documcnts.
Investments do not necessarily have to be made for the same length of time that
the funds are available. The basic criteria for consideration for investments are as
follows:
A, Keep maturities short in a period of constantly rising interest rates based on
Treasury bill auctions or the daily Federal Funds rate,
B. Keep maturities short in a period of an inverted treasury yield curve (short-
term rates higher than long-term rates).
C. Maturities should be lengthened when the treasury yield curve is normal and
is expected to remain that way based on economic reports taken as a whole, The yield
curve is normal when short-term rates are lower than long-term rates.
D. Maturities should be lengthened when interest rates are expected to fall
based on economic reports taken as a whole,
E. From time to time, securities may be traded for other similar securities to
improve yield, maturity or credit risk, For these types of transactions, a temporary loss
may be incurred for accounting purposes, provided the loss is more than offset by the
Struà tRrou~h words and passages are deleted. Underlined words and passages are added.
- 4 -
higher yield. The following circumstances are considered appropriate for a 5Wei3 an
exchange of securities to be considered:
1. The yield has increased.
Market aberrations are often caused by supply and demand conditions for
particular securities. For example, if a short supply exists for a particular maturity range,
then it may be advantageous to 5We-þ trade out of the security in a short supply and into
another similar security in a different maturity range.
2. The maturity has been reduced.
Market aberrations occasionally create a situation where longer maturity
securities are yielding the same or less than securities with a shorter maturity. Portfolio
quality can be improved by switching from the longer maturity security to the shorter
maturity with little or no interest penalty.
3. The quality of the investment has improved.
Market aberrations occasionally create a situation where certain higher risk
securities yield the same or less than an equivalent lower risk security. Portfolio quality
can be improved by switching from the higher risk security to a lower risk security without
any interest rate penalty.
F. A liquidity €e5e amount of approximately two (2) months of anticipated
disbursements, e)(cluding bend construction þayments or other bond po/meAts made from
escrOVJ or trust accounts, will be kept in relatively short-term investments. These would
include the State Investment Pool (SBA), F.L.G,I.T., Certificates of Deposit, U.S. Treasury
Obligations and Repurchase Agreements.
G. Although many securities are acceptable for investment using the authorized
list, some are not very desirable from a liquidity standpoint; accordingly, only those
securities with an active secondary market may be purchased from that list.
VII, PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION
The following are the guidelines for investments and limits on security issues,
issuers, and maturities as established by the County. The Finance Director, or their
appropriate~ designee, after consultinq with the Clerk of Circuit Court, shall have the
option to further restrict or increase investment percentages from time to time based on
Struà through words and passages are deleted. Underlined words and passages are added.
- 5 -
market conditions, Purchascs af in'lcstmel'lts based 01'1 bOl'ld covcnant rcquiremcnts shall
l'Iat be included in the portfolio compositian calculation. The following maximum limits are
guidelines established for diversification by instrument:
A. The Local Government Surplus Trust Fund (SBA)~ GAd thc Flarida Counties
Investmel'lt Trust.
1. A maximum of 80i'o of the portfolio may be invested in thesc Trusts
the SBA, however, bond proceeds may be temporarily deposited in the Trust Fund
Investment Pools until alternative investments have been purchased and are not a part of
this calculation.
B. The Local Government Investment Trust fund (F.L.G.I.T.)
1. A maximum of 35i'o of the portfolio may be invested in (F.L.G.I.T).
RC. Non-negotiable Interest-Bearing Time Certificates of Deposit
1. A maximum of 40i'o of the portfolio may be invested in non-negotiable
interest bearing time certificates of deposit or savings accounts.
2. The maximum maturity on any certificates shall be no greater than
one (1) year from the time of purchase.
3. A maximum of 25i'o of the portfolio may be deposited in the
instruments of anyone issuer.
6,D. United States Government Securities
1. A maximum of 75i'o of the portfolio may be invested in United States
Government Securities which are defined as negotiable direct obligations, or obligations
the principal and interest of which are unconditionally guaranteed, by the United States
Government (example: Treasury Bills, Notes),
2. The maximum length of maturity of any direct investment in
government securities is five (5) years.
Struà through words and passages are deleted. Underlined words and passages are added.
- 6 -
~.E. United States Federal Agencies
1. A maximum of 501'0 of the portfolio may be invested in United States
Federal Agency securities which are backed by the full faith and credit of the United
States Government (example: GNMA, Farmers Home Administration).
2. Maturity will be limited ts thc rcquircmer'lts sf Ul'1ited States
Governmel'1t sccuritics,
~ £ A maximum of 251'0 of the portfolio may be invested in the
instruments of anyone issuer.
E.F. Federal Instrumentalities
1. A maximum of 401'0 of the portfolio may be invested in Federal
Instrumentalities which are not full-faith and credit United States Government Agencies
(example: FFCB, FNMA).
2. Maturity will be limited ts the requiremcnts of thc Ul'1itcd Statcs
GO'¡crnmcnt securitics.
~£ A maximum of 251'0 of the portfolio may be invested In the
instruments of anyone issuer,
F-:~ Repurchase Agreements
1. A maximum of 101'0 of the portfolio may be invested in repurchase
agreements with the exception of one (1) business day agreements and overnight sweep
agreements which may go as high as 251'0.
2, The maximum term of a repurchase agreement will be one (1) year.
3. A maximum of 101'0 of the portfolio may be invested in the
instruments of anyone issuer with the exception of one (1) business day agreements and
overnight sweep agreements which may go as high as 251'0.
VIII, RISK AND DIVERSIFICATION
Assets held shall be diversified to control the risk of loss resulting from the over
concentration of assets in a specific maturity, issuer, instrument, dealer, or bank through
Struà through words and passages are deleted. Underlined words and passages are added.
- 7 -
which these instruments are bought and sold. Diversification strategies within the
established guidelines shall be reviewed and revised periodically as necessary by the
appropriate management staff.
IX. AUTHORIZED INVESTMENT INSTITUTIONS AND DEALERS
The County shall only purchase securities from financial institutions which have
offices located within the State of Florida and are qualified as public depositories by the
Treasurer of the State 6f' of Florida, from primary securities brokers/dealers designated
by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York~ or from secondary brokers/dealers, specified
dealers, with 61'1 office located il'l St. Lucie COUl'lt'f, with an office located in the State of
Florida. Such specified brokers/dealers must be recemmended reviewed by the
Investment Committee~ al'ld approved il'ldividuall.,. b,t the Board of COUl'lt.,. Commissiol'lcrs,
Documented lists of the authorized financial institutions and brokers/dealers will be
developed and maintained by the Finance Director and approved by the Clerk of the Court.
If at any time the Clerk of the Court is appropriately notified of any threat to the
integrity of the investment portfolio, proper security measures may be suggested and
implemented, and the Clerk of the Court shall have the option to further restrict
investment in selected instruments, to conform to the then-present market conditions.
Repurchase Agreements will be conducted through, and negotiated etTly with
primary securities brokers/dealers, or secondary brokers/dealers, or Qualified Public
Depository financial institutions. A written Master Repurchase Agreement will be
negotiated with any institutions with which the County through the Clerk of the Court
enters into a specific repurchase agreement.
X, THIRD PARTY CUSTODIAL AGREEMENTS
The Clerk of the Court will execute a Third Party Custodial safekeeping Agreement
with a commercial bank's trust department which is separately chartered by the United
States Government or the State of Florida. All securities purchased and/or collateral
obtained by the Clerk of the Court shall be properly designated as an asset of the County
and held in safekeeping by the trust department and no withdrawal of such securities, in
whole or in part, shall be made from safekeeping except by an authorized staff member.
The Third Party Custodial Safekeeping Agreement shall include letters of authority from
the Clerk of the Court, details as to responsibilities of each party, notification of security
purchases, sales, delivery, repurchase agreements, wire transfers, safekeeping and
Struà through words and passages are dele1=ed. Underlined words and passages are added.
- 8 -
transaction costs, procedures in case of wire failure or other unforeseen mishaps including
liability of, each party,
XI. MASTER REPURCHASE AGREEMENT
The Clerk of the Court will require all approved institutions and dealers transacting
repurchase agreements to execute and perform as stated in the Master Repurchase
Agreement. All repurchase agreement transactions will adhere to requirements of the
Master Repurchase Agreement. The agreement shall specify that the underlying
securities have a market value of at least ~ 103'Yo of the principal balance of the
investment. The market value is to be determined on a monthly basis.
XII. BID REQUIREMENT
Although in most situations the competitive bid process shall be utilized, there is no
obligation to secure competitive bids from all financial institutions and dealer/brokers on
the approved list. Rather a decision will be made by the Clerk of the Court through the
Finance Director as to the institutions that have been the most competitive over the
preceding weeks and these will be contacted for a bid.
A. After the Clerk of the Court, through the Finance Director, has determined
the approximate maturity date based on the cash flow needs and market conditions and
has analyzed and selected one or more optimal types of investments, a minimum of three
(3) qualified banks and/or dealers will be contacted and asked to provide bids on the
securities in question.
1. Bids will be held in confidence until the highest bid is determined and
awarded,
2. Documentation will be retained for all bids, with the winning bid
clearly identified.
3. If for any reason the highest interest rate bid was not selected, then
the reasons leading to that decision will be clearly indicated on the bid form.
4. If the maturing iRvestl'ReRt is funds to be invested are from a
certificate of deposit, the þrescRt holder of the fURds issuer of the CD will be one of the
contacts made, subject to the portfolio diversification requirements in this policy.
Strucl< through words and passages are deleted. Underlined words and passages are added.
- 9 -
5. In certain circumstances where a dealer or bank informs the County
of a potential sale that must be completed within minutes of notification, the competitive
bidding policy will be waived. The Clerk of the Court will have final approval on these
particular transactions before they have been completed,
6. Notwithstanding the above, in order to afford financial institutions
(banks and/or savings and loan associations) within St. Lucie County opportunities to
enhance the economy of the local area.. certificates of deposit may be purchased from an
institution as described in Sections V.F provided that the following additional conditions
have been satisfied:
a. The institution, or a branch office, is located within the
boundaries of St. Lucie County.
b. The i,nstitution has the highest and best bid of all bidding
institutions as described in Section V.F.
c, The institution awarded the bid is subject to the portfolio
limitation requirements and may not exceed said limitations.
d. Banks/savings and loan associations included on the approved
list must be Qualified Public Depositories, as determined by the State of Florida.
XIII, INTERNAL CONTROLS
The Clerk of the Court shall exercise and monitor a set of internal controls to be
conducted through the Finance Director, which said controls are designed to protect the
County's funds and ensure proper accounting and reporting of the securities transactions.
The investment policy shall provide for review of such controls by independent auditors as
meFf part of any financial audit periodically required of the unit of local government. Such
internal controls shall consist of the following:
A. All securities purchased or sold will be transferred only under the "delivery
versus payment" (D.V.P.) method to ensure that funds or securities are not released until
all criteria relating to the specific transaction are met.
B. The Clerk of the Court is authorized to accept, on behalf of and in the name
of St. Lucie County, bank trust receipts or confirmations as evidence of actual delivery of
the obligation or securities in return for investment of funds.
Struà throu~h words and passages are deleted. Underlined words and passages are added.
- 10 -
C. Trust receipts or confirmations shall fully describe the various obligations or
securities held. The receipt or confirmation shall state that the investment is held in the
name of St, Lucie County.
D. Written documentation and/or confirmation of telephone transactions and
wire transfers will be maintained.
E. There will be adequate separation of duties with clear delegation of
authority among investment personnel.
F. Custodial safekeeping shall be properly utilized.
G. Operation review and performance evaluations and reporting, interim and
annual, shall be done by the Finance Director,
H. There will be an avaidcil'\cc of no bearer-form securities.
I. There will be no physical delivery of securities.
J. There will be specific limitations regarding securities losses and remedial
action shall be taken as soon as possible.
K. A development of a wire transfer agreement with the custodial bank
outlining the various controls and security provisions for making and receiving wire
transfers shall be made.
L. There is a prohibition of collusion between those makinQ investment
decisions and those providin9 investment services.
M, Written dealer confirmation and monthly and/or quarterly custodial account
statements shall be maintained.
N. Investment policy shall be established by the Board of County Commissioners
considering the recommendations of the Investment Committee. All daily investment
activity will be coordinated and reviewed by the Finance Director. In the absence of the
Finance Director and Clerk of the Court investment activity must be approved by their
designee and later approved by the Finance Director or Clerk of the Court.
O. The following positions are designated by the Clerk of the Court as having
the authority to initiate all investment activities:
g:\atty\agreemnt\investment policy-Ol
-11-
1. Clerk of the Court
2, Finance Director
3. All other designees will be at the discretion of the Clerk of the Court.
P. All officials responsible for making investment decisions, or tkc Financc
Director, shall complete 8 hours of continuing education annually in subjects or courses of
study related to investment practices and products.
Q. Such additional internal controls as established by the Clerk of the Court.
g: \atty\agreemnt\investment policy-Ol
-12-
5/4¡Ø7-17 <--¡7~ ~
ø;fصó
~þ.vL--
Agenda
Friday, August 19, 2005
7:30 a.m., Conference Room # 3
St, Lucie County Roger E. Poitras Admin1" ~r;ti/OÓ ^;ð~ )j (
Convene meeting ~ ¡í v
Roll Call, announcements '1. ~,
Minutes " V
}I.-;
,
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committe
1.
Impact Fees Update
.J
~ð'
/
2.
Hurricane Reimbursement Update.
;/)
3. January 2006 Strategic Planning Session (tentative dates: Jan. 30 & 31).
Outstanding Issues (please see attachment)
4, Future Unfunded/Underfunded Capital Projects:
Est. Cost of Proiect
Emergency Operations Center
$6,000,000
$7,000,000
Old Court House Renovation
Special Needs Shelter (p, Î '7 1/ppp~066,ÖðO
Research & Ed. Park / Business Ctr. $12,637,919
Civic Center - Rebuilding or relocating? $?
Parks and Rec. Admin Building $3,000,000
Admin. Complex Chiller Plant $1,700,000
TOTAL $35,337,919
Shortfall
$6,000,000
$4,000,000
$2,áOO,OOO* -:2-.1 Z-- 2-
$12,637,919**
$ ?
$3,000,000
$1,700,000
$29,837,919
*
We are applying for an additional grant in the amount of $1,250,000
I am working with Senator Pruitt to have the State Legislature fund 50% of this project
**
Adjournment
Next CBC meeting: September 16, 2005
I
I
ISSUES TO BE DISCUSSED AT THE STRATEGIC PLANNING SESSION 2006
Public Works
-Budget and Alternative Funding
-Roads
-Midway Road - 3 segments.
-Kings Highway
-Possible funding source for Road & Bridge - CRA
-Stormwater Utility
-Increase Stormwater MSTU
-Funding
-Beach Erosion Control / Renourishment
-Environmental Impact Fees
-New Revenues
Central Services
-Fleet Replacement Schedule
-Essential Maintenance Projects
-Funding Space Needs
-New Revenues
Utilities
-Utility Master Plan
-Utility expansion funding
Human Resources
-Health Insurance
Growth Management
-Divisional/Staff Need Based on the TVC Elements
-Possible North County Facilities
-Budget Figure
-Growth Fee
Management and Budget
-Financial Report
-Revenue Alternative
-5 Year Plan
-Proposed Solutions
-Half Cent Sales Tax
Draft
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: July 15, 2005
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:35 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jacque1ene N, Burke, Jay L. Mc Bee, William "Bill"Casey, Troy Ingersoll,
Patricia "Pat" Ferrick, Reece Parrish and Carl Hensley,
MEMBERS ABSENT: Lillie Miller, Ron Parrish, Toby Philpart, Debbie Hawley, Edward Lounds,
Steven Messer and Linda Bartz,
OTHERS PRESENT: Commissioner Doug Coward, Faye Outlaw, Jennifer Hill, Anthony Bonna,
Marie Gouin and Doug Anderson,
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
There was no quorum for this meeting (Currently there are 14 members - we require at least 8
for a quorum). These minutes are for information purposes only. No Action could be taken
on the issues discussed,
Chairman Carl Hensley introduced new CBC appointee Jay L. Me. Bee to the committee members
present (This is his first meeting. He was unable to attend the previous meeting).
Doug Anderson introduced Anthony Bonna. He is working as a summer intern in the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) and this year will begin studies at Georgetown University.
MINUTES
Minutes were tabled for lack of quorum.
County's Budllet 2005-2006 uødate.
A presentation summarizing the recommended budget for Fiscal Year 2005-2006 was prepared
for the last day of the budget workshop with the BOCC and based on the Board's actions on that
day, staff prepared an update for the CBC (for details, please refer to exhibit A),
Doug went over the issues and began by stating that the bulk of the County's financial shortfall
as a consequence ofthe hurricanes ($7MM out ofthe l2MM) is due to the repairs made to Indian
River Drive. When the Federal Highway program estimated the cost and quantity of the damage
(right after the hurricanes), they where short in their assessment. FDOT agrees the estimate was
low and is supporting staff in going to the Federal Highway Administration (FHA) to request an
adjustment to their initial assessment. They BOCC considers it a priority to work towards getting
reimbursed by the FHA for the repairs to Indian River Drive and has instructed staff to focus on
this goal. Staff is outlining a strategy with FDOT to get reimbursed.
In addition to the fmancial recovery in the aftermath of the disaster, the CBC had recommended
to the BOCC several months back to set a percentage (5% of the total operating budget), rather
than a fixed amount for the Emergency Reserves (which had been set for several years at $8MM).
Staff is working towards achieving total financial recovery (assuming there are no other mayor
disasters to set us further back and that there is a steady increase in property values) within
roughly four years, but for now, as of October l, 2005 the board has agreed to approve
programing $3,927,292 towards the goal of having a 5% of the total operating budget in the
Emergency Reserves Fund.
If we add to these issues the Fund Balance Policy (for General Fund) that will be implemented
(also recommended by the CBq and the mitigation projects shortfall, it brings the total financial
goal to $21,532,645.
As he explained the chart showing the expected revenues and how they will be allocated Doug
pointed out that over $8MM will be going towards financial recovery in the General Fund,
Doug advanced to CBC members that staff is planning to bring up for discussion at the 2006
Strategic Planning Session critical subjects such as the problems in the erosion control, road and
bridge and stormwater utilities budgets (they all need increased revenues) and will be coming to
this committee at future meetings in preparation to presenting an action plan to the BOCC at the
2006 Strategic Planning Session. He stated staff will have to brainstorm options for alternative
revenue sources to propose to the BOCC.
He pointed out the modifications to the recommended budget that the BOCC approved (please
note that the maj or change made to the recommended budget was the decrease to the funds
requested by the Sheriff's Department), Those present discussed some of the aspects of the
Sheriff's budget and the different programs recommended by Dr. Kalmanoff, wich staff is working
towards implementing as soon as possible.
Troy stated he would like to see that a CBC representative attend those BOee meetings where
an issue this committee feels strongly about will be discussed, because he was surprised to hear
at the meeting when they were discussing opening the jail's pod 1 some statements from
commissioners: they inquired about the CBC's opinion, and talked as if they weren't aware ofhow
strongly this committee feels about this subject, Troy stated he was appalled to see the issue was
almost delayed further,
Commissioner Coward stated he does read the minutes from this committee's meetings and he
personally is aware of the recommendations made by the CBC and considers them meaningful,
but he is of the opinion that sending representatives from every board is not really necessary,
He stated that, of course, as residents (individually), everyone is welcome to come up at the
public comment portion of the meeting and voice their opinion when they feel strongly about a
subject,
Other members agreed it shouldn't be necessary if the BOCC gets the committee's opinion in
writing.
Doug continued with the presentation and pointed out the funds that had to be set aside in lieu
of the City of Port St, Lucie stating they will no longer collect impact fees for the County, to cover
our debt service.
Doug also pointed out that, after the reduction in the millage rate, the County's millage rate is
less that what is was in 1992,
Hurricane Report and Financial Recovery
Faye Outlaw stated that the oruy thing that has changed since the last CBe meeting is the
amount the County has been reimbursed from the FHA. It increased by $52,000 for Indian River
Drive,
Staff met with FEMA the day prior to this meeting in an effort to determine why is it that the
money is not moving through and what else can the County do to speed up the process (Out of
the $25MM submitted, only $16MM has been approved).
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
July 15, 2005
page 2
Doug stated that this is an issue that was brought up at a conference call with the Florida
Association of Counties (FAC) , because all the counties in this area are in the same situation and
are trying to resolve it as quickly a possible, because it is creating a cash flow pro blem and there
is always the possibility of getting hit by another disaster and having to resource to operating on
lines of credit.
CBC members and staff discussed different altematives regarding loans, issuing bonds and lines
of credit.
Impact Fees.
Doug stated staff has provided Dr. J. Nicholas (the County's consultant for impact fees)
information regarding what is currently being collected and what those funds have been applied
to as well as a list of what obligations the County has incurred based on future collections, plus
future unfunded projects.
Doug also explained briefly how impact fees must be used and gave examples of county projects
that are eligible and stated staff is working on a proposal to request to the City of Port St. Lucie
not to stop collecting the total amount of impact fees. He stated our BOCC chairperson has
already asked the City of Port St. Lucie Mayor to agree for ajoint meeting. Time is running out,
as the date the agreement ends is very near (Sepj30j200S).
Should the County's efforts not be successful, staff will have to come back to the BOCC with an
action plan as to how to go about collecting the impact fees that should go to county wide
projects, such as obtaining lists of first time construction permits issued in Port St. Lucie and,
if necessary, impose leans on those properties,
Pat Ferrick asked if it was possible for the BOCC to work on a public educational campaign
(specially builders and those that are planning on purchasing new built properties) as to what
are the impact fees and make them aware of the situation, so that they can put pressure on
getting this matter resolved in the interest of those applying for permits and, ultimately, in the
interest of the whole community,
She stated this committee has been discussing the problem with Port St. Lucie not wanting to
continue to collect impact fees for the last few meetings, and if the Board would have been made
aware of this committee's position, maybe they would have acted on reaching the public.
Those present discussed different legal aspects of this matter and the different arguments the
City of Port St. Lucie has stated not collect the fees for the County.
Pat Ferrick stated she has pointed out at previous meetings, when discussing this matter that
if the City of Port St, Lucie argues they don't want impact fees that they consider should be
allocated to projects within their boundaries going to other areas (because they are impacted
negatively), they should remember that, in the past, funds that where intendèd for other areas
have been redirected to projects that benefit their area (As it was the case with funds that were
originally intended for widening Midway Road, which were used to improve Port St. Lucie
Boulevard; Midway Road was negatively impacted and is now suffering the consequences, as the
capacity of that road is insufficient and the tum lanes don't meet concurrency requirements. At
that time everyone agreed the city's rapid growth had a more urgent need to complete that
project) ,
She stated she would like it reflected in the minutes and brought to the City of Port St. Lucie
Council's attention that when they have had a greater need for improvements, everybody has
Citizen Budget Conm1Ìttee Meeting
July 15. 2005
page 3
agreed and has been cooperative and understanding and we only expect the same from them.
Committee members asked if the City of Fort Pierce and the Village collect the impact fees.
Doug responded in the affirmative and stated that we do not have any problems regarding this
matter with the other municipalities and they are cooperative.
Future subfects to be discussed
Doug stated there is a lot come in the next meetings, such as discussing BOCC's goal and
objectives, outstanding issues that will be discussed at the 2006 Strategic Planning Session and
to find altemative sources of revenue for capital improvements that are necessary, but are
unfunded.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC regular meeting is scheduled to be held on Friday, August 19,2005 at 7:30 a,m"
in Conference Room # 3 of the St, Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 8:45 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
Carl Hensley, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
July IS, 2005
H:\O SecretarylO OMBICBCIMinI07'15wpd
page 4
Exhibit A .-
Q)
¡:::
.....
µ.. ,-...
r- V) ~
0 N V) '<t -
...., ...- c::
0\ '" \0 ~ ::I
o· N ...., r-: N "'"
00 r-: r-: ...., ~
00 Q) ~
'" N ...., \0 "'--
è N 0\. '" II'> ¡::: V:J Z
- ...., ...) N Q) "0 ~
Q) II'> II'> II'> !A
d r::: ...
:> ;:::j ,-... 0
0 ,-... V) "'"
I µ.. r- c'd
U 00 -
r-
Q) 00 Q) '" N (0)
~ ..... ~ '<t. 0 ...., c::
¡::: 0 N tï:
B 00 0 ~
'<t 0 0 --
...- Q) '" N N o. I ~
~ 6 '.... \0 00 ...
~ II'> ...., '" 0 (0)
..... 0'. '-' II'> II'> (0) c::
~ 00 t) 0
u '" ..... I r-. , IE 0 (0)
§ (0) (0) 00 ~ '" 0
'" ~ 0 ¡: II'> '" ¡: o·
0:1 ~ II'> (0) 0 '-'
(0) (0) » ~ I (0) u (0) \0 '"
r::: t¡ '" .~ '~ µ.. E '" 'E E c:: l"- i:
(0) 0 "0 » (0) 0 II'>
..... .5 ~ Õ 0 (0) -g 0 'ü (0) (0)
- < èð '<t (0) blJ .¡¡; I £,-...
µ.. 'ü "0 » ~ ~ E p., '" c:: r/J 0:1 c:: '"
<::: u (0) 0 (0) "," ~ þ ã ~ ..:.< "'0
(0) (0) c:: 'ü ~ Q .... ~~
"0 (0) u r- <: '2 ~ >< 0
Q c:: blJ ã c:: <: '" II'> ~ ~
(0) ... 0:1 þ&:: (0) ::I ..s <:...)
ê Ë ~ c:: I "0 ê þ u
~ tï: '" ~ -'"
c:: .- .¡¡; c:: .- 5V"t
~ g ~ ..:.< :; 0 g :ë
0 "0 æ 0 ... ~ -
u .5 c:: Uc;5 0 U 0 u æ '-'
(0) ::I ~ II'>
~ "'"
Q)
.....
~
""C:
p..
:::J
p..
o
..c
.E
o
~
.....
Q)
bI}
""C:
~
~
\0
o
I
t.r)
o
o
N
>-
~
§
o
U
()
'(3
~
~
~
o
~
J:
en
ï3
ï3
'"C
<
>-
15
~
o
U
¿
o
en
~
()
'"C
~
00
~
o
Q
lr\
o
o
N
00
>-
"3
......
.....
¡z¡
r/J
Q)
::s
-
~
>
€
Q)
p..
o
I-<
p..
Q)
r/J
~
Q)
I-<
U
¡:::
.....
~
r---
r---
C'I
-
..
¡.¡
-;
=
¡..
""
a-
""
-; ~ ~
'y ~ oô
:; 3 fA
£~
..,
~
..
OÞ
..,
=
=
..,
=
=
r..
N
'"
""
ô
....
....
.,.,
¡;;
'"
'"
Ô
N
....
Ñ
¡;;
00 a-
.... ""
"" '"
~ ~
.- N
~ ~
'*
""
'"
00 N
00 ""
oô v)
a- '"
""
"" ""
a-
'"
a-
-ë
""
N
.-:
""
'"
'"
0'
N
....
Ñ
""
.- ""
'" ""
.... ""
lrI" oó
.- or>
'"
"" ""
~
""
'2 c'd;Ë §
~ 'C ~r:: t: .¡;;
5~,_=E
C-''- ¡.¡.'- ¡;,;¡
I()
oc
-
~
I()
N
~
N
'"
..
..
oc
,..:
....
.-
oé
'"
I()
oc
~
:ñ
Q
N
'"
=
w; -=
c:r""
~=
~ð
-;
~
N
0 en
.- :>. ~
~
Cd 1:: QJ
~ QJ ><
(1) 0..
Co) 2 N
r/) 0.. -.i
I ""0 /I
è QJ
en"""';
(1) Cd Cd
;;> QJ 0 ~
0 b Cl}
Co) ¡:::- l~
._ Cd
(1) ~·ü '<tN ~
~ o ¡::: 1.0";,
r---Cd N 0\ ~
.- .¡::: M'<t
Cd ~l+:: Ir) .......~
.-
Co) ....QJ ....... Ir)
~ Cd > "@ N (iA E-.,¡
Cd ""O,~ 0 (iA
~ QJ,.r= Cj
,- ""0(,)
µ.. QJ Cd -
QJ 0 Cd
¡:::.... .-
(,)
en QJ ê
~ ~
QJ- ¡:::
><~ .-
~
o
.-
~
Cd
~
(1)
Co)
r/)
I
è
(1)
;;>
o
Co)
(1)
~
.-
Cd
'ë:)
~
Cd
~
.-
µ..
r<)
0\
"1-
r<)
00
00"
Eß
~
<I)
>
....
<I)
'"
<I)
.0
o
.; ~
<I) ._
13 ~
<l)UJ
z_
-.0
I: <I)
50
E ....
<<E
.. <I)
~"O
<I) .-
'"
('
V)
V)
0\"
r<)
; i ~
r-
('
0\
~
'<:t
V)"
IA
"
Eß
<I)
'"
c<:I
<I)
....
o
<I)
"0
'"
E
<I)
E
'"
:I
:e'
<
;:;
0/)
"0
:I
ex:¡
~
<I)
>
ï§
o
o
o
('
o
è
o
;...>
tI.J
.-
::r:
(1)
;...>
Cd
~
(1)
bI}
Cd
.-
.-
~
~
z
:>
o
u
IIJ
g~
¡..:~
"'IIJ
Š
..J
i
!j
. ~
"'..
"'G
~~
~8
êi~
UI2
~.~
¡g",
'"
'"
'"
'"
QÈ~
~~.~.~
"'~~12
~"'<Oj.J.
u 1Iid..... :5
ZUJ~,ÇI)
"'~o
(,j1.4.g"
~ /7 /J L-'/
j;J ~.~
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
OJ- -0 é-
.!'¡,...I ì Y
/4/-
Þs' (v';::::>
Agenda
Friday, July 15, 2005
7:30 a.m,. Conference Room # 3
1.
{ t/ ~r' p ,b Y
IJ~ nlft / /0
UfÍ0~'P f ß
FY2005-2006 Budget update. . r '¡i f.(ft¡J
Hunicane Financial Report and Financial Recovery Plan. ~V\
Impact Fees. ( IJ
Convene meeting
Roll Call, announcements
Minutes
2,
3,
Adjournment
Next CBC meeting: August 19,2005
. ~/ /
/ J 1/ r-t:-/
t' ,/'
(,/.;'f -.; V
5/1;;1
rv'1/b
t I
L..
OfiJP
i7~
I~
Dra
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: June 17,
Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Lillie Miller, Ron Parrish, Toby Philpart, William "Bill"Casey, John Knapp,
Debbie Hawley, Edward Lounds, Troy Reece Carl Hensley and Linda Bartz.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Jacquelene N. Burke, Jay L. Mc
Messer.
Patricia "Pat" Ferrick and Steven
OTHERS PRESENT: Toby Long, Garry Wilson, Pat Tighe, Jennifer Hill, Marie Gouin and Doug
Anderson.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
Reece Parrish.
to the committee: Jay L. Mc. Bee and
Items 5 and 6 (Jail Pods) were moved up to the
of the meeting,
included verbatim minutes of the presentation made by Dr.
Kalmanofffrom the Institute for Law and Policy on his recommendations to improve St.
Lucie County's Criminal Justice System.
There being no corrections to the minutes for the May 20, 2005 meeting, members present
voted in favor of approval.
Openinjl of Pods 1 &> 2 (Countv Jail).
Sheriff's staff made a presentation explaining the reasons why they are of the opinion Pod 2
should be opened as soon as possible after Pod I is
County Jail's Major Patrick Tighe began his that at the previous meeting
Sheriff staff had been asked to come back with: 1) An estimated revenue forecast of a possible
contract with the US Marshals for housing inmates; 2) Illustrate a design philosophy and
operational budget for a 50 bed minimum security stand alone unit (work farm facility); and 3)
Review the current jail population (for details of the presentation, please refer to exhibit A).
Housinq Federal Inmates
Before the US Marshals agree to a contract to pay St. Lucie County Jail for housing federal
inmates, they would tour and inspect the jail facilities to verifY if they meet the requirements (this
has been already done and the jail passed inspection). After there is an application process
(they are currently undergoing this part). The last step is when Washington sends auditors to
determine the cost per inmate per day to house them in the St. Lucie County Jail; this is when
the negotiation process begins to reach to an for the service the St. Lucie County jail
will provide.
Based on the median calculated among the surveyed counties ($63.16/ day I inmate), the Sheriff's
Office staff estimates 100 federal inmates would bring a gross revenue of approx. $2.3MM within
one year.
CBC members and staff discussed several ofthe variables that would affect that calculation (i.e.:
Counties where the federal courthouses are located charge more for the service). They also
\
v
discussed possible aspects that could be negotiated.
two possible designs for a Minimum Standalone Security Unit
the estimated annual operating cost for either one would be approx. $ 1.28 MM.
Doug stated that if each inmate should have 85 sq. ft., the building would cost somewhere in the
range of $680,000,
stated the County pays $2Sjhr. for deputies assigned to monitor the inmate work crews,
which translates to very low costs for labor.
Overcrowding
Major Tighe proceeded with his presentation pointing out the jail's aver¡:¡ge population, which has
been over design capacity since 1997,
Attendees discussed the overcrowding situation and how long it would take to train the
correctional officers for pod 2.
Committee members and staff discussed the statistical information the Sheriffs staff showed at
the end of their presentation.
Major Tighe also mentioned the cuts the governor has made to medicaid and stated 21 % of the
jail population has mental health problems.
Sheriffs staff also brought an explanatory video about jails and their roll in the community (This
video presentation can be made available by request. Please contact OMB at (772)462-1670 for
more information).
As discussion progressed, Doug stated he had gone over the previous CBC meetings minutes and
although opening pod 1 had been discussed in depth, there hasn't been any formal action as to
recommending to open it.
Bill Casey moved to recommend to the BOCC to open pod 1 without delay. Linda Bartz
seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and motion carried.
There was discussion of possible alternatives regarding setting the date to open the new pods and
how much funding would be needed vs. how much would be the revenue from a possible contract
with US Marshals.
Committee members and staff also discussed what drives the jail population up and how much
violation of probation offenders are costing to the jail. Those talked about ways of coming
up with money to cover the new pods' expenses.
members stated their concern as to how important it is to get moving with fInding a way to
open both pods and catch up with the jail overcrowding situation.
Ed moved for the CBC to make a statement to the BOCC that they support the concept of
continuing to move forward to get the necessary personnel trained and assign the necessary
funding to open both pods as soon as possible and giving staff the opportunity to work it
out during the budget workshops in July 2005. Ron seconded the motion. All members
present voted in favor and motion canied.
Impact Fees.
There was some discussion regarding how the Building and Correctional Impact Fees are used
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
June 17.2005
page 2
way it affects the judicial system.
Doug stated that the Sheriff has become
refusing to collect Impact Fees on
getting those funds would affect public
in the issue of the City of Port St. Lucie
October 1, 2005, because not
Part of the money that goes to debt
comes
Fees also.
be
another jail (all ancillary
any further).
Staff is also planning
services of the current
Faye Outlaw
reimbursements
damages and the
B).
Doug begin
attend (Schedule win mailed out to
subjects he will bring to the BOCC's
rates and building up the Emergency Reserves.
members to
out some important
budget, address millage
Staff will give this committee an update of
CBC
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC regular meeting is scheduled
Conference Room # 3 of the St. Lucie County
a.m., in
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 9:30 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
Carl
Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
June 17. 2005
H:IO Sec'etarylO OMBICBCIMinI06'17.wpd
page 3
50 Person Minimum Security Unit
Location
Cost
Palm Beach
Esc-ambia
Lake County
Highlands
Pasco
Pinellas
82,00
48.50
58,58
4MO
63,16
79AO
5222
54,00
25 Person Minimum Security Units
Male/Female
Operating Budget
Unit
$ n725,00
Food
51,100,00
Medical
102,930.00
1 110 1B5,00
Estim¡¡ted Annuai
Operating
$1 ,284.940.00
10 Year Average Daily Population
BEDS
Current Designed Capacity 756
Juvenile Housing 12 6
Current Total Bed Capacity 768
Inmate Population Count 1199
(June 10. 2005)
Percentage of Design Capacity 156%
f:.*.<;\ ,¿;;,..~ ...i-"" ..~~ <i'.J,. __,;1><:0" ~~ .¡þ""''''.... ð''¡ ",Jl ;;-",,, /rf
~'ti {¡'" -¥ '" <;...it'" if' .~.. .;¡oi'
Dailv Inmate Population
2004-2005 Monthly Average Daily Population
Probation Violation
2004 2005
Overcrowding Overcrowding
2004
2005
2004
2005
2
Overcrowding
2004
2005
New Construe
Current Total Bed Capacity
New Construction
Building #1 Designed Capacity
Building #2 Designed Capacity
New Total Bed Capacity
768
256
+320
1344
~ . ~ L ~
Total Bed Capacity (August)
1024
tnmate Population Count
(June 10, 20(5)
1199
Percentage of Design Capacity
117%
Overcrowding
2004
2005
Total Beds RemaininQ
New Total Bed Capacity
1344
Inmate Population Count
(June 10, 20(5)
-1199
Total Beds Remaining for Rent
145
Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 2002
(Page 90)
Number of Inmates Per Emplovee "'c
FlorIda
3,3
4.6
'C lomat."to..\.ff t¡!ltlð. ;.vør~ -cìl\h:ulatltd by dividing t~ numbo.r of con.flned ¡nma'" by thlt numø.r
(If 1I111,¡pkryu_ on JuO$ 30, 1:999,
5o",«;., \,1.5. th>pilirt1"J1&m ~f Juotk.::t:, 6Uffl-IIU of J!!1Ilk\(. $tflH.jJ"íi, C';#fl.'J"''' <:If Jðl1#, 1999, NJC 1!6&3':í {WunloQfon,
DC: I.U't D*part!Tlltnt <;if JIJlttk., WOil, liP. '1"..26, -r-blll adapl<td by SOURCEBOOK 'moff.
3
132
33
601
Officer 4.5
3.7
Number of Certified
Number of Civilian Staff
Average
Population
Number of Inmates per correctional Officer
5.995
Number of Inmates All Employees
3.2
5.74
st. Lucie Count
Minutes from
Dr. Kalmanoff: "
to have beds or
Now, you guys can
not
to !leed
developing
be left holdingthé bag
very, very important. I
that."
(Page 3, line 24 29 & page 4, line 1 - 2)
~ § g
g-gg
It'! N It'!
;:{":":
...
w
~WZ
~!cO
=DIn
:J~=
::......
r:Z2
zW8
:JWw
8=z
w:J:J
-13~
u2é
:J¡¡¡IE
.....~G
¡..:
In
0:>
II)
00
,..:
N
<:>
~
....
N
t-
""
"i
t-
,..:
""
....
<i.
I-
o
I-
... "" ....
"" '" C ~ .,¡o e Q co
... <:> ... .... Q Q Oð
eô ci ö ... Q <:> co
m ... co "" M Ö .., ,..:
"'. "" <J) to 'oo. iD '" N
.... ci Ñ co N co 0. Q
N <::> ... ..; Ñ m ... ci
... ... ... N ... .... .... ""
.... .... .... .... ...
I- >-
I-
Z :;j
I!.I
::ïiE ii5
I!.I «
!J' :;j
I!.I a: >-
~ ::J I-
!XI Z
::ïiE ::ïiE :::>
« ¡¡¡ 0
0 a: (.) !J' I!.I
0 0 0 W (.)
I!.I I!.I I!.I ~ ¡¡:
~ I- ~ U.
« I!.I I!.I W 0
::ïiE ::ïiE ::ïiE !J' ~ (.) !J'
¡:: ¡:: ¡:: ~ ¡..: ...J I- Z ü..
!J' II) II) « I/) « u.
I!.I I!.I I!.I >- In a: ~ a: õ2 ...J
...J ...J ...J I- I!.I :::> «
« « « z 0 ::ïiE I/) I!.I l-
I- l- I- ::J I!.I I!.I ~ ::¡: 0
0 0 0 0 u. u. I/) l-
I- l- I- e.>
'"
0::
«
II! 0..
II! '" ~
.~ ~ Z
~ ~ ~ II>
Q ::> ìñ 0::
fiI ~..I ~
I- 0:: ~ 1-0
~ ~~ìñ
~~~~ffiu
;ill!:$~:ï!z
gæ~~ij~
4"
,
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
MEMORANDUM
05-91
FROM:
Douglas M. Anderso
TO:
Board of County Com
DATE:
July 12, 2005
RE:
Proposed Implementation Schedule of ILPP Study
Attached is the proposed implementation schedule of the ILPP Study.
DMA/ab 05-91
c: Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Faye Outlaw, Assistant County Administrator
Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney
Ed Parker, Purchasing Director
Roger Shinn, Central Services Director
Honorable William L. Roby, Chief Judge
Public Safety Coordinating Council
Citizens' Budget Development Committee
Attachment
PROPOSED IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE OF IlPP STUDY
GPS Electronic Monitoring
Pretrial Services Study
Integrate SoftwarelData Bases
Differentiated Case Mgmt Study
ire Criminal Justice Coordinator
Build Courtroom at Jail Using
Video First Appearance
Implement Pretrial Services Program
Establish Weekend Work Program
Analyze Constructing a Work Farm
More Judicial Positions
etermine Jail's Future Staffing
Done
X
X
X
Done
NOTE: The above schedule will be updated and added to as we continue to implement the
recommendations of the ILPP Study
.1lA
fr:1¿!v:
St. Lucie County, Florida /;//
Citizens' Budget Committee
'-
l1\li
II .
'" )0' '.,..'
...................................,.
."",L
Agenda
Friday, June 17, 2005
7:30 a,m" Conference Room # 3
St. Lucie County Roger E. Poitras Administration Annex
Convene meeting
Roll Call, announcements
Minutes
1. Hurricane Financial Report. ~
2. Financial Recovery Plan, /' /'
3, PSL Impact Fees Report, ./
4,
vf
if
Dr. Alan Kalmanoff 's presentation,l
I)V
PV ¡¡ß
(0
) :)1 I í
'\
01
1
rfj
Opening of Pod 1 - Recommendation to BOCC
Pod 2 Status Report,
f3¡,4&er ~¡:Ja"ß
Adjournment
Next CBC meeting: July 15, 2005
k"/J/1 7 jþA-j/t,,./¿F'rl .- ~;I~
:>.('2./ 37'Z-/7t,l ¿,../~VÐ
~ 6'72 ~í /..,r ~ ~s-v
J
~ L ~l./ µV~
)kv r'-.
.....
""'"
Draft
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: May 20,2005
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a,m,
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jacquelene N. Burke, Toby Philpart, William "Bill"Casey, Debbie Hawley,
Troy Ingersoll, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick, Carl Hensley, Steven Messer and Linda Bartz,
MEMBERS ABSENT: Lillie Miller, Ron Parrish and Edward Lounds.
OTHERS PRESENT: Toby Long, Garry Wilson, Pat Tighe, Charles Padrick, Jennifer Hill, Marie
Gouin and Doug Anderson.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
None. Some additional information was handed out at the meeting, based on requests made from
committee members since the last meeting.
MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the March 18, 2005 meeting, Debbie moved
for approval and Pat seconded the motion. AU members present voted in favor and the
motion passed.
Carl pointed out there where minutes to the April 15, 2005 meeting for members to read (minutes
don't need to be approved, as there was no quorum for this meeting and no formal actions where
taken) ,
Hurricane Recovery Efforts- Reimbursement
Doug gave an update of the hurricane assessed damage and reimbursements (please see Exhibit
A for Details), He pointed out the amount for damages continues to go up and when the damages
to the Old Court House and the Civic Center are added, the numbers may increase significantly.
He also stated stafEs preparing the budget based on a 13% increase in property values. Ifthe
property values come at a higher rate, it will help mitigate the deficit between the hurricane
damages and the funds available (staff estimates it will take about 5 to 6 years to recuperate
financially) .
Pods 1 & 2 (Countv Jail).
Doug referred to memo to the CBC included in the agenda packet regarding this matter (item #
2) and he directed committee members to page 12 of the Sheriff's budget request (also in the
packet, item #8).
Doug stated that based on the numbers from the budget request submitted by the Sheriff's Office
for FY200S-2006, it appears opening pod 2 for federal inmates would be barely a break even
operation and the money necessary to support the facility's operations for the initial 6 months
(hiring/training period, which would not generate revenue) is not readily available. On the other
hand, staffis working towards implementing the recommendations made by the Institute for Law
and Policy Planning (I LPP) to lower the average of the jail population, which would mean that pod
2 may not be needed for local inmates for a while.
Toby Long, Sheriff's Office's Comptroller, stated that hiring personnel now (to accept having
custody of federal inmates) and getting the correctional officers trained (26 officers), would mean
'-'
...,
the federal government would pay for part ofthe expense, opposed to waiting until the rest of the
jail is overcrowded (Major Tighe stated it already is) and has to be used for local inmates, which
would mean not getting any of that financial aid, Additionally, he stated, their staff has been in
conversations with the One Stop Centers, whom have offered to pay up to 50% of the
training/wages cost for up to the first 40 weeks. He stated the officers starting salary is approx.
$29,000/year (including benefits). He added that the idea would be to have federal inmates
(generating some revenue) before the 40 weeks are up.
Pat Ferrick asked if 26 is the number of correctional officers necessary to run the pod or if there
will be a need for more.
Toby stated that the officers the Sheriff's Office had asked for are already assigned to pod I (pod
I will not open until July) and, yes, 26 officers is what they need to operate pod 2.
There was a discussion regarding the availability of funds to open pod 2. CBC members
expressed their concem in regards of how imperative it is to open the pod in order to avoid fines
for overcrowding.
Major Tighe explained that the conditions in which the inmates would be is what would
constitute overcrowding (e.g. mattresses on the floor is not a constitutional issue, but not having
enough toilets or showers to provide for every inmate is),
Bill Casey requested for County and Sheriff's staff to come back at the next meeting with more
specific costs and revenue numbers, because it is his opinion that they could not make a decision
with such broad assumptions, He requested information regarding overcrowding and, if possible,
to provide any information in regards to grants, federal aid, One Stop Center, etc, for training or
any other expenses. He also asked if staff could provide information in terms of the legal
implications of being overcrowded (fines, lawsuits).
Doug Anderson agreed that he was getting a lot of new information at this meeting and that it
would be very helpful if the Sheriffs staff could provide more specific financial information as to
how they would run the operation of pod 2.
Pat Ferrick asked how long it takes to train the Correctional Officers.
Chief Deputy Garry Wilson stated it takes between 4 to 8 months. Ifthey come already certified,
it could take as little as 4 months, if they have to be trained from zero, it could take as much as
8 months,
Several CBC members expressed how imperative it is, in their opinion, to open the pod and
attendees discussed about how long it will take to implement the recommendations made by the
ILPP,
After much discussion CBC members and staff agreed they will come back at the next meeting
with more specific information to discuss this matter more carefully and come up with a
recommendation to the BOCC.
County Credit Ratinl!:.
Doug referred to the e-mails and other attachments in the agenda packet (item #3), which state
the County's financial standing (healthy, strong, stable). He stated he believes the good rating
is in part because he discussed with the rating companies the County's Financial Recovery Plan
(keep budget low, expectation of property values rasing), and they expressed their satisfaction
with the explanation,
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
May 20, 2005
page 2
'-"
'WIll
Marie also handed out material explaining the ratings definitions. The county got an A rating
from Standard & Poor's and an A2 rating from Moody's, despite the difficulties that the hurricanes
caused last year,
Downtown Fort Pierce - Capital Profects.
Doug referred to the information included in the agenda packet (item #4) and pointed out the
costs by project and funding sources, He mentioned the bulk of the projects is to be funded by
impact fees and there are some problems to be expected regarding this matter, to be discussed
later during this meeting,
Impact Fees.
Doug mentioned the agreements that the County has with the cities to collect the impact fees
when the building permits are pulled.
As it has been mentioned in prior CBC meetings, the City of Port St. Lucie has stated that, after
the current agreements expire on September 30,2005, they will no longer agree to collect the
County's portion of impact fees ("Roads", "Public Buildings" and "Parks") and will increase the
amounts they collect for this purpose.
Those present discussed some details of the most recent events regarding this matter, between
the City of Port St. Lucie and the County, and the possible legal consequences of the actions
taken by the City (the County may have to impose liens on the properties that pull construction
permits in the Port St, Lucie area, until they pay the County's impact fees).
CBC members and staff also discussed the projects that are directly affected by this matter and
the public relations difficulties it will bring, as the County's portion of the impact fees will be
perceived as if it's a new type of taxation.
Doug stated there is a meeting scheduled with the City of Port St. Lucie on June 6, 2005, and
staff will come back to this committee with an update on this matter,
Criminal Justice Study Update - Pretrial Services.
Doug stated the Board of County Commissioners has approved a Criminal Justice Coordinator
position that will be working under the County Administration (The position is posted). That
person will be responsible for implementing the recommendations of the Institute for Law and
Policy Planning (ILPP). Staff is working on implementing these recommendations, such as
considering establishing a work farm for trustee inmates and implementing a pretrial system
agency to expedite the trial processing (for more information please refer to memo that was
included in the meeting's agenda packet, item #6).
Facilities Space Study (RFP).
Doug spoke of the ILPP recommendation to make a space study to assess the current and near
future space needs of the court system.
As the discussion progressed, some CBC members expressed their cone em about how imperative
it is to solve the problem of the jail overcrowding and to avoid getting fined by the federal
government before thinking in solving other problems, such as space needs for court employees,
Carl pointed out that for now, staff will just be going out for bids on the space study and once
those come back, a decision can be made.
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
May 20, 2005
page 3
w
'tJ
Sheriff's Bude:et Request for FY 2005-2006.
Copies of a memo from Garry Wilson to Doug Anderson was handed out in regards to information
comparing ratios for Law Enforcement and Correctional Officer per capita within the County and
with other Counties/Regions, as per a request received from some committee members in lieu
of articles that had recently appeared in the newspaper commenting on the SherifI's budget
request (please refer to memo for detailed information),
County's Bude:et 2005-2006.
Doug reported that to this date some of the funds are out of balance and staff is working to
balance them.
Alternative Fuel.
Doug stated that, per Ed Lounds request, he had asked Charles Padrick, County Fleet
Superintendent, to come before this committee to give a short presentation on the different
alternatives the County could go for in regards of fuel supply (diesel, natural gas, hybrid,
methanol vehicles).
Staff and committee members discussed the different options in vehicles, the bottom line cost
and if the County is purchasing the kind of vehicles that it really needs, as well as some details
of the Vehicle Replacement Program.
CBC members also inquired if staff is looking into the possibility of getting grants and Doug
instructed Chuck Padrick to consult with the County's grant writers to check what is available.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC regular meeting is scheduled to be held on Friday, June 17, 2005 at 7 :30 a.m" in
Conference Room # 3 of the St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 9:05 a,m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
Carl Hensley, Chairman
Citizen Budget Conunittee Meeting
May 20, 2005
H:\O SecretarylO OMBICBC\Min\0520,wpd
page 4
'-"
. CD n C n
Ø) ~ CO C CO W
N en C Ø)
It) <Ii .. Ò .. 0
..: C CD C CD ¡¡:
III .... n .... ... n II..
¡III C .» oñ .» ,..: 0
.. C - ... ... en
N - ... ü..
~!ë - ... II..
... ¡¡:
w
~ICI ::a:::
~A. en
::::»::1 In I- >- E
:c..o I- ai
Z ::¡ C
r:z2 w ãi ;¡
~
III .. w c:( +
Z:E° e/) ::¡ 0
w a:: >- I- 0
::::»IIIN C) ;:) I- Õ c
oen>t e:( a:I Z g;;
U~" ~ ~ ;:) ¡¡: C
e:( ¡¡¡ 0 w ~
III::I:E c a:: (,) c Ñ
e/) ::ï
-II c c c w CD
...J ..
U:E w w w ~ e:( ,.:
::::»- ~ ~ ~ II.. ...
W I- +
..alii ~ ~ ~ e/) a:: ....
.~ ¡:: ¡:: ¡:: w 0 CD
a:: '"
l- e/) e/) e/) ::a::: ai
en w w w >- e/) '"
...J ...J ...J I- ...J ....
<Ii
e:( e:( e:( z e:( ....
l- I- I- ;:) I- ....
0 0 0 0 0 ...
l- I- I- (,) I- r
III
~=
~ICI
~A.
::::»::I1n
z..O
>oz2
I- III ..
Z:E°
::::»IIIN
8= ~
111::1==
-II
U:E
::::»-
..alii
.~
..
en
~
....
cñ
CD
co
..
N
...
co
N
....
cñ
Ø)
en.
-
-
...
C
C
C
Ò
It)
co
cñ
...
C
C
C
,,;
n
C
..:
...
N
....
...
..
It)
....
,..:
...
...
z
o
~
l-
e/)
Z
~
C
e:(
~
3:
::a:::
C)
:¡:
...J
e:(
a::
w
c
W
II..
w
(,)
¡¡:
II..
o
e/)
ü..
II..
æ
w
::a:::
e/)
W
l-
e:(
l-
e/)
Cl
:¡:
W
II..
w
(,)
z
e:(
a::
;:)
e/)
~
...J
e:(
I-
o
I-
w
0
z
w
IX:
III w
II..
¡~z u..
is
~iCo 0
~lCIen N
~A.i2 ~
::I::Ie( ~
:c..A.
~z:E
1110 It)
Z:EU ....
-'
::1111)- ¡¡:
oene( Q,
U~~ e(
!!;..a
U:Ei2
::::»-A.
..allle(
.~
..
en
..."
CD '" C 0
;z It) 0
Ø). 0
<Ii ; .n
'" '"
0 N Co
.n .¡- ....
... ... ...
~ co 0 0
N 0 0
.... .... 0 0
ai ai ci .n
CD Ø) It) '"
co "!.. co o.
.¡- .... .,; ....
N ;¡; ... ...
...
co It) . 0
'" .... 0
.... .... 0
M ,.: 0
'" It) g
co ....
.,; ,..: co
.... ... .,;
... ...
z
:ë w
0 0
e( ¡¡:
u..
~ W W 0
l-
e( (,) en
::a::: I- z ü..
CI III ~ u..
::a::: ~ ¡¡:
c ~ :J w
III
W W ~ ::a:::
u.. u.. III
'"
'"
...
M
....
'"
ci
....
...
N
....
...
i
....
,.:
..
...
IX:
~
IX:
w
~
-'
¡¡:
Q,
e(
~
z
~
::a:::
en
o
o
o
ci
o
"'0
....
:;;
.
'"
....
'"
ci
~
,.:
'"
...
-'
e(
I-
o
I-
en
UI
Uan
111:0
::10
ON
en ..
°
c:»N
Z>O
-e(
~==
::I
""
en
N
II'!.
...
....
o
~
...
C'Ø g g
... 0 It>
.......ciÑ
.... ... ....
~~~
....
...
g~~~tØM
ON'" It> ;:Ii ...
~g~:1i~~
~~~~:--~
~. ~ ~
~
Z
o
~ ~
< N
wliiwR¡ W
CI<cZ~O:: ~
i :¡: Z :¡:
~CILCI IL
C<c~!!~ ~
g~~~~ ~
~ :¡: 0:: Z ~o 0::
:;¡ClWCl W
~:x>iiiëiJ õ:
:a ..J ¡¡: 0 Ii: '" 0::
..J~~iE~~~
<CWõS-ZÕ
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
W
~ ~
Z ~
~ j
~ æ
W
o
¡¡:
II..
o
'"
ü.. ~
II.. §
¡¡: W II..
W :) W
:¡: Z q
'" W W
~ ~ 0
I!': 0:: if¡
0:: ..J ffi
~ ~ II:
15 g õ
«
....
-
m
-
:I:
><
UJ
'-'
.."
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
MEMORANDUM
05-71
TO:
Board of County Commission s
Citizens' Budget Develop t Committee
Public Safety Coordi a in unci!
FROM:
Douglas M. Anderson
DATE:
June 7, 2005
RE:
Presentation - Institute for Law and Policy Planning
Please find attached verbatim minutes from the presentation by Dr. Alan Kalmanoff on the
Sf. Lucie County Criminal Justice System Assessment presented March 22, 2005 to the
Board of County Commissioners.
These minutes are important in that they outline areas within our criminal justice system
that need changes and recommendations on how to address and implement these
changes.
Staff plans on using these minutes together with the report prepared by Dr. Kalmanoff as
the guideline to achieve these goals.
DMA/ab 05-71
c: Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Faye Outlaw, Assistant County Administrator
Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney
Attachment
tw
\filii
St. Lucie County Criminal Justice System Assessment
Prepared by: Institute for Law & Policy Planning
March 22, 2005
Minutes from the Presentation by Dr. Alan Kalmanoff
Comm, Hutchinson: In regards to the board workshop on the criminal justice
system assessment, Mr. Anderson, are you going to start or just wave the
background or is Dr. Kalmanoff going to get right into it?
Mr. Anderson: Madame Chair, just for the public who are here today and those
watching us on television, this is televised, last year, a year ago, we were in a
severe overcrowding situation at the county jail and one of the things that the
Board of County Commissioners authorized was an assessment of our jail
population and an overall review of our criminal justice system to see if there are
recommendations that can be put in place to help us alleviate overcrowding and
become more efficient. With that, we contracted with the I nstitute for Law and
Policy Planning and Dr. Kalmanoff, who is heading up that program, He and his
folks have been here these past summer months, prior to the hurricanes even,
doing this study; he is here today to present his recommendations, With that
Madame Chair, I would like to turn it over to Dr, Kalmanoff, unless there are any
questions,
Comm, Hutchinson: Thank you,
Comm, Coward: Madame Chair, before we begin, and Dr, Kalmanoff, you don't
have to pat yourself on the back, but could you give us a brief overview of your
experience,
Dr, Kalmanoff: OK, First of all good morning everybody, I'm AI Kalmanoff,
Everybody calls me Kal. I am the director of the Institute for Law and Policy
'-
...."
Planning, Trying to be responsive to the question, I am a 62 year old guy with a
law degree and masters and a PHD in city and regional planning and have been
working studying county criminal justice systems, local police departments and
such for about 35 years, I have done about 250 studies quite like this one,
including about 7 or so in Florida most importantly Orange, Hillsborough, Leon,
Palm Beach, and Polk, Orange would be the best example of a very similar study
seven or so years ago that has been more or less implemented since, I have
other experiences in this role; I have been on the faculty of 5 different
departments at UC Berkeley, most recently the law school. I wrote a book on
criminal justice enforcement and administration, put out by Little Brown in 1976.
That is pretty much my back ground.
Comm, Coward: Right. Thank you,
Dr. Kalmanoff: So. We meet again. I came to town a long, long time ago. Doug,
actually it was more than a few months before the storms, It was way, way back,
The Study was supposed to be a 60 day emergency study, People were
chipping at each other when I got here and not getting along over this issue and
often time when people in power don't agree, hiring a consultant gives you time
to regroup. So it is not uncommon for me to come into situation where folks
aren't really clear with one another about what the political policy answers are to
economic and budget problems. Ithas been a very interesting year. We had 60
days to complete the study, As you'll hear in moment, some of the weakness in
study are because the storm began to hit: we couldn't get people on the phone,
we couldn't data. We had a whole bunch of a month flow over of the study. We
were sort of unable to proceed, But in one of the ways the time frame has been
helpful because change doesn't happen overnight and there's already some
changes on the landscape. Let me start off my saying there have been a number
of key people that have helped with this study, Judge Angelos was the Chief
Judge when we started and was extremely helpful in pointing out major issue;
2
....
"'"
things that she felt could be improved, She offered her offices and data and was
in full cooperation with the study, She had comments at every turn, Judge Roby
picked up right where Judge Angelos left off. He was very supportive and very
helpful and certainly had lots of really good and tough questions for me during
the course of the study, The prosecutor, Bruce Colton, has been excellent. He
has been very, very forth coming with data, and very, very helpful. The Sheriff
has been a match, a real man, He has been very much honest, above board and
forth coming, We don't always agree, but that hasn't caused any problems. We
have gotten a lot of interaction that has really helped.
There's a couple of weakness in the study, and I want to hit them early,
The first weakness is the study is supposed to have been 60 days, It would have
been done well before your November election, In fact, there was a question
about putting out a draft before or after the election, The draft report, in some
ways, describes a system that no longer is exactly the same. Certainly, there's a
new Clerk; and the coverage of the Clerk's office is probably the weakest on the
final compared to the draft because it was very difficult to try to redo everything,
There were many changes from the newly elected office head, who kindly
provided the information to make a lot of the original findings mute, Therefore, it
was difficult to come back and make more authoritative findings at the end of the
study. There's a weakness there. And I also think that there is a little bit of a
weakness in terms of mental health because some data is not available on the
inmate mental health, and it is very difficult to get a grip on that. Other than
those exceptions, I am kind of comfortable with the study, I think that if you want
to leave this room with some simple findings, I would start of with: the Sheriff is
either is going to either need to have beds or mechanisms to lower the jail
demand, one or the other. Now, you guys can argue about which one, but the
point is that you can not leave the Sheriff holding the bag. This study does not
mean the end of spending money. You either have to spend money on programs
and developing the infrastructure or beds, or both. And the Sheriff should not be
3
w
..."",
left holding the bag of crowding people in without remedy, This is very, very
important. I think that we should all leave this presentation with that.
I think a fundamental finding of the study is that you have a bunch of well
performing criminal justice agencies: the court, the prosecution, the Sheriff's
Department, law enforcement, the defense, probation; all these agencies are
functioning at a professional level. There are not any bad guys. You have a
bunch of agencies that are performing well. You do have a county that is
growing very rapidly, but not in terms of an infrastructure of criminal justice. You
have grown but your governance! your management over the criminal justice
system has not grown the way your system has grown, You see the result of
independent agencies doing their thing very well, working very well together on
individual cases, a lot of closureality, a lot of well performing relationship between
agencies, However, what you don't have is, up at the top, a group of 8-10 key
people running the system with some coordination in mind over it all, to make
sure that there is not unnecessary crowding or inefficiencies in your system, and
to try as much as possible to reduce the demand for the county jail beds where
that demand can be reduce with in the confines of public safety, And in this
county, you certainly can do that. You can reduce the demand for the jail without
impacting public safety,
Let me start right off with the recommendations. Feel free to interrupt me
with questions or comments. I'll be able to get back on track. I'll stop from time to
time as I go through these recommendations trying to elaborate. If I pontificate
too much, interrupt me and I'll move on.
The first and most important is some restructure of the Public Safety
Coordinating Council to form an executive group. In the body of the report, we
told you who we thought should be on that executive group, at least to start.
Here's the deal, you set up a group of the people who are really the gatekeepers
to whole system. They are the key decision makers at the entry points: law
enforcement, the Sheriff, the jail, the courts, the prosecution, the finance of
money, and you put them around the table and you give them the data and you
4
w
..,.,
say please coordinate this criminal justice system, Now, the United States
Department of Justice, Prisons, National Corrections; these agencies have all
come squarely down as in favor of this, as in best practice in terms of jail
crowding and justice system efficiency. These are not wild ideas, This is BEST
PRACTICE. Let me say it again, Best practice is to have a group of
gatekeepers who meet periodically. , , small group, , . with the right data to
manage the criminal justice system, Therefore, if there is an issue about earlier
appearances, night court, or weekend arraignment or jail docket, if there is an
issue about classification or grants, whatever the issue is, the key people will be
around the table talking about the impact of that particular change on the system,
Clearly, if you are going to have more police officers you are going to need
prosecutors, defenders, and judges, Clearly, if some agency gets a grant, the
other agencies are going to be impacted because it is a system, Grants should
be cleared out through that Public Safety Coordinating Council. Direction and
coordination is its basic deliverable, Now, this kind of group that has been setup
in most of Florida's counties that we have worked in and it continues to work over
time, Politics and elections keep happening, but these groups continue to
manage the system, This is the major recommendation,
In support of that recommendation, I suggest adding a person to the
county management staff, reporting though the criminal justice agencies to the
county manager, called a Criminal Justice System Coordinator. This person is
not a czar or a boss over all these independent people. Rather this person is to
collect the data and put the news together to keep a focus on the criminal justice
system and its managements. This person can resolve crowding problems that
are currently be dealt with by a staff attorney from the Public Defender at the jail.
They can work with jail population control people to solve problems. However,
the issue for that person is not cases, it is cause. NOT CASE, BUT CAUSE!
That person is involved in coordinating overall system through the Public Safety
Coordinating Council executive group.
5
'-'
,.""
Two brand new pieces of government, both of them not without some cost
of position and meetings, These are the two most important recommendations
because putting everybody at the table will get you to the rest of it, just like it got
to me pretty quickly by talking to folks when I got here,
The next recommendation is to develop a pre-trial services program and
get technical assistance to establish it from the pre-trail resource center in D.C,
Now, this is a very important recommendation, and it has generally the support of
all the important players in your criminal justice system. Basically, it is a risk
assessment program that occurs immediately at arrest; the prior record, the
likelihood of appearance and the likelihood of a further crime of the arrested
person are assessed by trained people who collect data on that person from prior
record, current offence, address, employment, etc, These facts are weighed
against a point scale that helps to create a recommendation to the judge for pre-
trail release. The judges have the discretion here, No one is taking their
discretion away, This recommendation is designed to enhance that discretion,
not to limit it. In other words, just because some one has 21 points, doesn't
mean the judge has to let them out, although that might mean the person was
recommend by the OR program. We're talking about hiring four or five folks here
to interview people as they come in to the jail, to get information, to verify and get
it to the judges very, very fast. The biggest problem in crowding in 8t. Lucie
County is the door way to the jail. There are too many folks coming in who get
right out anyway or should. There are too many folks whose cases should be
resolved quickly, but aren't. There are too many people sitting instead of moving
quickly. The business of jail crowding, everybody needs to remember, is not how
many people check in, not how many people come to the jail; It is how long they
stay, The key to understanding your jail overcrowding problem is a simple one, if
you go back to the data in the earlier part of the report; it says that the average
length of stand has been increasing. It doesn't need to increase very much to
torque the whole population mathematics and increase jail crowding. The nice
thing about that is that it doesn't need to reduce very much to lower demand to
6
~
~
lower population and give you a much more manageable system all the way
around, It just takes speeding up the front end, The most important way to do
that is the pre-trail release program, Your discussion about a monitoring system,
a GPS monitoring system, is just one of a number of tools that can be used in
pre-trial release. It can also be used to monitor the post sentence stage- the
GPS monitoring system. It is just one. You basically want to spot the people that
don't need monitoring, and get them right out. You want to spot the people who
might need a conditional pre-trial release like checking in everyday, or you might
need to put people on monitoring to get them out. Either way, the idea is to take
the statute and constitution of this state that calls for the presumption of non-
financial release and actualize it as a program, Very few counties of your size
and complexity don't have this nationally. The pre-trial research center in
Washington will be able to come in here with judges from other counties and
work with your bench to provide forms, procedures, point systems, personal, and
all the rest of it. This is supposed to be managed by the courts and funded by
the county in the way we have recommended it. The pre-trial research center has
set these programs up all over the country in very conservative settings, and in
very liberal settings. They don't come in and tell you who to release and who not
to release. They come in with a wonderful kit bag of tools, and experienced
people who have been through this before, and help set up a program quickly
that can make a big difference in your jail population and in the fabric of your
community for a long time there after.
Now there are a lot of recommendations in this report that deal with: get
there first, fast; do it quicker; make it happen earlier; and there are none anymore
important that the one that says the Public Defender should meet with the clients
of the Public Defender earlier on in the system, The data shows that there is
about a 30 day average before this meeting occurs, and shows the average
length of stay for those people is about 34 days, It doesn't take long if they are
seen to get their cases resolved, wouldn't it be nice if they were seen in 4 days
7
'-'
..""
instead of 34, They would probably be out in 6-10 days, That reduction in
quantity equals one pod,
At the front end of this system, there is a need for something called a
citation in lieu of arrest, policy, procedure, and some data. Currently, the Sheriff's
Office does cite light weight misdemeanors in the field on occasion, There is data
to show it. It is true for FPD and PSLPD, as well. Florida Law allows you to stop
somebody from shoplifting, lightweight crimes, if the danger of the offense
continuing is over, if there is no danger to evidence and victims, if the person can
10 himself or herself, the officer has the discretion to cite, write a ticket. You
show up in court, rather than get arrested and get booked into the jail, which is a
couple hundred dollars event for a crime where the person is going to be out on
the street in bond in a few hours anyway, This policy is difficult because it isn't
highly regarded by law enforcement. I suggest that people focus on it and say
that a citation in lieu of arrest between all three agencies is needed. And the
minimum we would hear immediately is start to collect data on how many arrest
and how many citations, whose being cited, and what their failure to appear rate
is, This will show that we care about this policy enough to count it. We're hoping
that the actual new policy is drafted by all three agencies. We think a resolution
by this board, at some point, urging those agencies to set up a common arrest
policy and citation in lieu of arrest policy will be very effective, There are a lot of
people that come in to your jail that come off of the midnight to 8AM shifts that
don't need to come in, They don't need to be pulling on officer of the street.
They just need to be cited. However, there is not that much control and not that
much consistency in those kinds of arrest. A parallel procedure would be a
citation program in the jail, which has been used in the past in this county, where
the sheriff cites people out of the jail that he believes are a risk to appear, and
should have been cited in the field and now that they have been identified, can
be cited in the field to further reduce the pressure on booking and population.
Field citation and jail citation and keeping book on it will lower the intake into the
jail.
8
w
~
The next recommendation is of a different order, The study indicates the
need for more judges, It was the first thing that Judge Angelos and Judge Roby
told me when I interviewed with them, It isn't a tough case to see, You do need
more judges, Your judges are over worked; not by cases but by the length of
cases because what is happening is we are sentencing guidelines and a bunch
of changes in the law over the last 20 years causes the length of the cases to
take more time. There is more work and motions involved, Don't just look at
case load, This recommendation says that county and community leaders
should organize and strongly support the effort to add more judicial positions to
St. Lucie, I suggest chartering a bus and traveling to Tallahassee with the entire
Board and the entire criminal justice Public Safety Coordinating Council and
lobby on behalf of the county criminal justice system to get more judges. Getting
more judges by itself is not going to solve to crowding problem. It is just part of a
solution, I think you guys can get together around this issue and make it a county
issue and go up to Tallahassee and make your case, It will be very good for this
county to do that. It requires civic leaders, community leaders, and political
leaders to jump on board and do something in a coherent way, It needs to be
organized and planned.
Next, is something called DCM, Differentiated Case Management. Many
courts, at the stage that your court is at, are moving to Differentiated Case
Management. It is becoming more and more difficult, to administer! manage a
court calendar. There are more and more cumbersome complexities. There's
traffic, small claims, civil, all kinds of criminal, all kinds of locations, there's
misdemeanors, there's felonies, It is hard to schedule in a way that uses
everybody's time and energy to the best. Differentiated Case Management is an
attempt to improve on this scheduling, As with a lot of items in this report, it
would be a mistake if you said to yourself that the courts are terrible at
scheduling. Actually the courts are brilliant at scheduling. I don't know how they
manage to do it given the pressures on them, The Differentiated Case
Management will improve them quite a bit. It is a more modern technique for
9
'-"
...,
jurisdiction, more like the size you are becoming, It is a simple idea, Instead of
going alphabetical, to give each judge a case in a random order, you say you
take all the A's today, We know from experience that the A's are a days work,
etc. We find tracks in the calendar that allow judges to hear cases in the most
efficient way, and have the prosecutors and defenders organized in that way,
There are some downs sides to this and it will have to be tailored, just like suit of
clothes, Therefore, the recommendation here is just like the pre-trial release
program, Bring in, for minor money (10 grand would be my guess),
National/State courts who are very experienced in working with local jurisdiction
to develop an individualize, customized case tracking system that you could
organize your judicial calendar and scheduling around. You work with the Public
Defender. You work with the State Attorney. Some meeting and papers get
exchanged and after 6-12 weeks you have a system that is likely to have cases
move through the courts more quickly, Even out judicial work load and enhance
the use all the resource judges, prosecutors, and defenders of the courts. This is
not sexy item, It isn't a Cadillac with a shiny bumper. It is an in the trenches
scheduling system that will benefit everybody. No one is messing up, but
everyone will do better with the Differentiated Case Management system,
We should reevaluate the bonds' schedule, By the way, I have a list of the
recommendations that is sitting over there, if you want to follow along. I am
reading off a chart that comes out of the action plan in the report, and there are
copies up there, Reevaluate the bonds schedule amounts: I have had some very
good natured disagreements with many people in this room about this bond
schedule. I'll be leaving without the agreements resolved. It is our sense, that
compared to other counties, the bond schedule is high. Some folks say no, it is
not. It is our sense that it should distinguish between violent and non-violent.
Some folks want to move by that distinction. We believe that the bond schedule
should be looked at. In concert with the pre-trail release recommendation, so
that at least if someone isn't ORed on a pre-trial release program, perhaps their
10
~
...,
bond will be reduced, We have made recommendations for more motion
practice around bond reduction and other such things,
Moving on to the jail. I said it at the out-set, and I'll say it again, You've got to
give the sheriff either beds or relief from demand. That is not something that you
have a choice about. Lot of counties make the mistake and say that they will just
handle it. That is not the way to do it; you have to get out ahead of this one,
There is nothing more important than to get out of the situation that I found when
I got here last year, It was terrible, You were polarized, You were hollering at
each other, and finally decided to build some beds at some point in the
discussion. The amount of attention that was paid to what kind of beds was
minuscule, Of course the real issue there, "is what kind of beds?" That is the
real issue, What I am suggesting in this next recommendation is that you
determined jail staffing needs now, and your next set of beds now. Not when the
jail gets so crowded, and somebody is hollering at you, and somebody is
hollering at them and people are pointing their finger at one another. That is not a
healthy way to do this kind of planning, Now, I am going to do a good audio
visual technique for this; I am going to do a little diagram for you and I want you
all to follow me for a minute. This is an upside down pyramid. The point of the
pyramid is point down. This much of the volume of that pyramid is the operating
cost for a jail. This much of the pyramid, coming down and more narrow, is the
construction cost for a jail. This much, 10% of the construction costs, is the
architectural fee. The amount of money that you need to plan a jail and staff a
jail is right down here at the bottom of the pyramid. Y'all follow me? What that
says is the tiny little bit of money that you spend, $50, $100 or $200 thousand
dollars, on planning efficient jail beds that match your needs classification wise,
and fit your staffing parameters, involves yourself with millions and millions,
actually in this county billions, over the life cycle of the jail and operating costs,
You need to put money and time and energy today in to jail planning. Not
because you should building new jail beds tomorrow, but because tomorrow you
may be called upon to build. You need to have a decision that is a good decision
11
'-'
...."
politically, a good decision technically in place rather than have yourself yelling
law and order accusation at one another in a public forum without really dealing
with the practicalities, Deal with the practicalities now. I don't know when you
are going to need new beds, in spite of the fact that we have projections in here
that that suggest not for a while, and in spite of the fact that this report can cut
the jail population by a third. I'll say it again; I think that this report can cut the jail
population by a third, It isn't going to happen overnight. It isn't clear to me
whether your growth and demand will over take that. It isn't clear to me when
you'll need that. I am not a crystal ball. You should have a plan that is staff
based, that is classification based, that talks about what new beds will be next. It
also says don't occupy those new pods, or build new beds until you give this new
plan chance, Otherwise, it will be $100,000 bucks thrown out the window, If you
are willing to make this plan, as you are find your neighbors are, they are
carrying this book around in Palm Beach County for 10 years after we did the
study there. They implemented it as they went. They were carrying the book
around in Orlando as I was visiting last week; they are still using it there on
recommendation number 77. The idea is that this is along term deal. Counties
around you have implemented work that we have done, and saved millions and
millions of dollars. We have got to do this first and real quick now; implement this
plan, Start thinking about the next building that you are going to build and later
occupy those pods if you need them and start building . . . if you need them.
The next one is perhaps the second biggest ticket item in the whole report,
It says develop the strategic plan to integrate all your county and criminal justice
system data bases. Now 20-25 years ago, counties that used computers to
automate their criminal justice system, each worked on the county's main frame,
including the courts and Sheriff, everybody but the local police departments.
What's happened in the last 20-25 years, there has been a revolution in
technology that client server kinds of systems have become so specialized that
the courts can go out and by a wonderful piece of software just to manage the
courts, The jail can go out and buy a wonderful piece of software just to manage
12
~
....,
the jail. Your jail has a great system, and I am still getting data off that system
just the day before yesterday, It is a wonderful system, Other agencies have
done the same, They have brought what is called a record management system,
or a case management system that is designed for their agency, The problem
with that kind of progress is, it is like cotton in a drift, each agency smokestack
data base becomes an island and it is unable to communicate with the next
agency's data base, Even through each agency is better managed, the system
as a whole is poorly managed, increasingly so because of the lack of integration,
This isn't in your county, but in a North Carolina county they had entered the
name of the defendant 134 times in one case. Doug Anderson ought to feast on
this one: You have duplicate positions throughout this county, You have people
looking at a computer screen of somebody else's data, and putting into their
system, This data ought to come over here automatically; it ought to happen
without a button, To have two computers not talking to each other causing extra
positions is not good. You have to deal with this. My criticism is that you don't
have a planning process in place or a plan, It isn't that you haven't already
integrated all your data bases, because it is difficult and time consuming and
challenging, Politics and turf get in the way. Without a plan you are dead in the
water. A plan will save you millions and millions of dollars in duplicate data entry
positions and in the mistake people make when they type off one screen to
another, and in the clean up operations and whatever. Ideally, in vision the
following: The police report written by the arresting officer becomes both the OR
report, their record on the data, the prior record, the eligibility for release, the jail
booking sheet. It will give you all the information you need to book that person
in, and back fields itself if that person has been in the jail before. It will alert to
gang membership and TB, That same form becomes the prosecutors'
information or indictment form. That same form is available for the public
defender with the basic information for starting a case, That same form goes into
court as a docket sheet, etc, You do not want to have a bunch of separated
13
'-'"
...."
islands drifting apart form each with the data that is the blood, along with money,
of the criminal justice system, You must integrate these data bases,
The secondary recommendations are important, and I am going to cover
them, However, before we go on, I want to say something about the
recommendations as a whole one more time, In addition to the list of primary
ones I just covered, and the secondary ones, the report has another 50-60 that
aren't even summaries in the action plan at the end because they are more
esoteric or technical to individual agencies. They talk about improved risk
assessments instruments at the post sentences stage, They talk about various
little tricks with stuff; they talk about new grants. These that I am about to talk
about have more system wide impact, and have therefore a little bit more play
here today. How am I doing on time?
Comm, Hutchinson: If I could just interrupt one time. If I could just ask the Board
before you move onto the next stage, if there are any question on the primary
recommendations, ,..,okay, go right ahead.
Dr. Kalmanoff: Okay. Let's talk about "Weed and Seed," "Weed and Seed" is a
federal grant program that has been in some of your cities here. It is credited
with reducing crime and being very effective. It is also credited with volume
demand to the jail. I don't want to get into the argument of whether it has reduced
crime or not, or whether it has added to the demand of the jail. I think it is
important that you see that you have a program that is run by the police that isn't
necessarily coordinated county wide with the second part,.,the Seed part. The
Weed part is currently okay. However, the Seed part isn't happening, It is
supposed to be a high impact law enforcement program aimed at a high crime
area. It has happened and lots of arrests have been made, but it is also
supposed to provide new resources into that high crime area to turn it around.
This is not happening. Our suggestion to you is because there are a lot of
people in the county who would privately say this is not really weeding. This is
kind of like cutting grass for extra money. When you take a look at the "Weed
and Seed" program and establish for yourselves objectively in an impact
14
'-'
...,
evaluation that it is having an impact on crime, I don't know the impact on the
good feelings of people who see more cops or the good feelings of people who
got the grant who the good feelings of people that sit on the committee. I think
the question needs to be, "is crime reduced because of this program? What are
the numbers?" This has been a problem around the country, An awful lot of
counties have the "Weed and Seed" program, and they tend to create lot of
activity around the front in to the system; but there are serious questions about
the impact of the program on crime, There is also the problem of not doing the
second part of it , . , the seeding part,
Adopt uniform procedures for the city, early pre-trial conferences, motions
forward trial days, granting tracking continuances, This is a big gaggle of small
concepts that have to do with the courthouse culture. It has to do with the way
cases get resolved, Remember, if you will, the overwhelming majority criminal
cases end up being resolved thru a plea bargain, The accused pleads guilty for
a particular crime and to a particular punishment and the case is settled without a
trial. Obviously, if 95%-97% of all criminal cases are going to be resolved through
plea bargain, you can assume that the earlier that you are able to achieve that
plea bargain the fewer jail bed days would be spent at pre-trail and the longer
somebody would spend time on sentence or state prison or wherever they are
going. Therefore, these recommendations suggest that consistently staging pre-
trial conferences early, getting the parties together kind of like you do two kids
who are fighting, and sitting them down and getting this deal resolved early is a
very advantageous court policy and will improve the use of the jail and everybody
else's time. This same rational has to do with continuances, It is always a
difficult cultural issue in the courthouse to say no, you are going to trial or you are
going to do this motion even if the attorney says that they are not ready.
Courtesy and culture suggest that people get continuances. The judges do a real
good job one at a time tiring make these calls, I will suggest that they have a
little bit more of an overriding policy in keeping track, It is always helpful to count.
When you start counting, continuances go down, When you start counting, those
15
'-'
...,
that ask for the most ask for a few less. It is good to count. Of course, this
business about doing it early, doing it as early as you can, goes to the issue of
meeting with the public defenders clients as early as possible so plea bargains
could be arranged as early as possible.
Now we go on from there to a general recommendation that says to use
pre-trial and post sentence risk assessment instruments more through out your
system, Currently a lot of different places, and I am not going to bore you with
the details, people are broadening, are putting in programs, are put in a situation
of badness and goodness, How much of a risk is this person is basically the
decision, That decision, it has now been effectively demonstrated nationally, can
best be made by a tailored validated risk assessment instrument that has some
science behind it. That says 99% of the time somebody wearing a gray suit with
a tie, etc, , .it gives you points for certain things, It helps makes these decisions
relatively consistent. It's a mistake that points alone should make a judges
decision; it is just the opposite, It shouldn't make anybody's decision. These risk
assessments should all have an override for the discretion of the officer. We
don't want to say that "thou shalt cite all misdemeanors;" we want to say "thou
shalt cite all misdemeanors who are eligible to hear, or use officer discretion."
You should be able, if you see fit, to have your supervisor come sign and take
them in. We aren't trying to take the discretion way from the decision makers,
but rather create a little bit more of a rational parameter of objectivity around
these intake and continuation decisions that tend to cost a lot of time in the
criminal justice system. Use instruments. Be able to override them, but use
them.
There is a recommendation in here that says that jail docket hearing
should be occurring more frequently so that people who are eligible to get out
can get out earlier. There is one that says the Chief Judge's role should be
expanded to manage Differentiated Case Management business and the
changes in the court around criminal cases. There is a recommendation that an
old and very successful fast track program be reinstituted, which is already being
16
~
"'II
done, Those cases that can be identified as speedy, get identified early, and
sped though. Again, we want to reduce the average length of stay where ever we
can, There is a recommendation about a more regular video courtroom at the
jail. There is another recommendation about releasing detainees on OR if a
certain deadline is passed by the prosecutor. There is one about creating
misdemeanor mediation programs, the light weight misdemeanors to keep them
out of court all together,
There recommendations about drugs and a drug courts that are very
important. One: you have a drug court that is somewhat immature compared to
the drug court that I am used to looking at, and so it hasn't yet done as good a
job as I think it should about saying these are the people best suited to drug
court. They'll do the best. Instead of saying, y'all come because you will all do
okay, because some people will do fine in drug court but they will also do fine in
regular court, Those folks should not go to drug court, Drug court is like eating
out at an expensive restaurant. It is worth it for those people who wouldn't do
well anywhere else, It is not worth for it those people who would do well
everywhere else, You can't let those courts be creamed. The way to do that
again is with the risk assessment instrument national best practice. I'll give you
some hints about how to do this, and at the same time you need more drug
programs through out your county, in the jail for the inmates and outside the jail
in ways that judges can sentence people to a program and feel secure about that
program's security and program, You have a big drug problem in this county and
a big mental health problem in the county, As I said earlier, it is a weakness in
this study that we didn't give you the exact numbers on mental health. We sure
did tell you 78% of your folks are involved with drugs, You have a drug problem
in the jail. You got to have better drug programs and spend more money on them
in the community,
There is a recommendation in here about training police officers to do a
better job at the charging of their arrest so that there is a little bit less
overcharging and a lot less cases that have to be dropped later by the State
17
'-'
"""'"
Attorney, or take time to play or drop, It all has to do with training, There's a
bunch of recommendations in here about the Public Defender's bond practice,
and speedy trial practice, and just doing things more quickly and more timely
manner. There is an every important recommendation that I don't know that you
aren't going to like, particularly Doug, about setting up a new department called
Community Corrections, I believe that although the court should manage pre-
trial, setup a county department that marks the level of maturity and growth that
your county has arrived at that can oversee electronic monitoring of community
service and work programs, that can oversee reentry program and data".
Of course, it needs to be managed, grant funded, county funded coordinated, It is
not something that you want to have scattered all around the county. You want to
have it under one person, It is in the end on alternative to jail. Almost every big
county I go to, your size and bigger, has something like this. Sometimes
probation runs it, sometimes it is run privately, There are arguments that y'all
may want to get into about how to deliver it, but somewhere a consolidated place
where the whole range of sanctions other than jail is administered, You don't
have those sanctions now, hardly any, That is one of the reasons why your jail is
under such pressure because you do need a lot of alternatives if you expect to
not be putting people in jail.
I am going to try to wrap up here, I do have a line in here about setting a
cap on your jail and administering that cap with a release mechanism, This is
very common nationally, Say the jail gets to 1,200, the 1 ,201st person goes out
when someone new comes in, You have a skew for the light weight person with
the least number of days, or you want to establish some conditions, or change
their relationship to pre-trial. Whatever it takes so the jail doesn't go over a
certain level. This goes along with a number of recommendations I have made
about the jail in terms of taking a slightly more active role and managing its own
crowding.
I don't think I can say enough about classification, I'll just finish with that.
The jail is in the middle of re-classifying folks. It has a new system in place. It is
18
.....
'tJ
doing a lot better job, 53% of the folks in the jail are minimum security. You don't
have a single minimum security bed in the county, Now, there are some
comments made in the books saying that you have these dorms, Those dorms
are minimum security; they are max or medium, They are inside a doubled
parameter. What you need to do is start thinking about minimum security jail
beds for the very, very light weight offenders that this community may continue to
want to pay for to house in jail. Those that may not be eligible for varies
programs or alternatives, Such a facility you might envision could be an abandon
motel. It could be a hotel/motel type construction, It could be run by a private
security guard. It could be very low staff, very light weight, very inexpensive, but
still a loss of liberty, The door slams, and you take care of the need that currently
isn't being met, except in a greatly overpriced and expensive way,
SO.. ,what to do? We have a Public Safety Coordinating Council meeting
coming up. I think that your Board should resolve that the public safety create an
executive group, called a Public Safety Coordinating Council. I think that you
should resolve that Doug hire a coordinator for that group or for y'all, I think you
should jump right in and do a whole bunch of program planning and policy
planning activities, I have already told you Orange County took 8 years to
implement our report, Hillsborough worked faster, but then abandoned it after 3-4
years. Leon had a mixed approach. Palm Beach County did a lot with this report.
This report was actually commissioned not but the county board but by the
economic council which consists of the most powerful business people in the
county, They commissioned the report. In any event, the county took it over
when the report was one, and implemented most of it. It took them a long time,
think you should look at this as a decade in terms of getting all 80 so
recommendations in place, However, there are about 2 dozen that I would not
let the sun set on, I get right after them, I am more than happy to answer
questions and elaborate. I think I have talked too much already, I will say again I
have enjoyed the study and have been very ell treated by everybody,
Respectfully Submitted, Alexandra Bryant
19
~
...."
June 14, 2005
Honorable Mayor Robert Minsky and PSL Council members
Dear Mayor Minsky:
I would like to address two important matters that arose at the May 2,2005, special
meeting of the Port St. Lucie City Council and St. Lucie County Board of
Commissioners. I attended the meeting.
First, I would like to clarify the role of the St. Lucie County Sheriffs Office within the
City of Port St. Lucie.
By Florida statute, a Sheriff's Office must patrol within a city even if there is a city police
department. Currently, the St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office maintains four patrol zones
that cover the City of Port St. Lucie. Two of these zones also include portions of
unincorporated St. Lucie County. However, all four patrol zones have deputies who are
readily available 24 hours a day for rapid response within the City of Port St. Lucie.
At the request of City Manager Don Cooper, the Sheriff's Office has instituted marine
patrols within the North Fork of the St. Lucie River within the City of Port St. Lucie.
At any time, the Sheriff's Office bomb squad, K-9 unit and aviation units stand ready to
assist Port St. Lucie Police Department. In addition to the presence of Uniform Patrol
services within the City of Port St. Lucie, the Sheriff's Office Civil Process Unit,
Criminal Arrest Warrant Unit and Special Investigations Unit (which investigates short
and long-term vice cases including narcotics, prostitution and illegal gambling) are active
within the city,
Within the past month alone, members of the Sheriffs Office Special Investigations Unit
shut down three marijuana "grow houses" in the City of Port St. Lucie, arrested four men
and seized 401 marijuana plants. Undoubtedly, the marijuana under cultivation was
intended for locations throughout the region and the State of Florida, as well as within
Port St. Lucie. Crime of this nature does not respect urban boundaries.
As Sheriff, my mission has been and always will be to continue Sheriff's Office patrol
services and a comprehensive law enforcement presence within the City of Port St. Lucie
(and the rest of St. Lucie County) to ensure the safety of its residents,
The second matter I wish to address is the City Council's move to terminate its
agreement with St. Lucie County to collect new building impact fees, That decision may
have important implications for the safety of the public.
/
'-'
...""
The St. Lucie County Public Buildings Impact Fee is used to pay for capital
improvements or land acquisition related to the County's public building needs, Sixty
seven percent (two-thirds) of the total collected Public Building Impact fees are used for
debt service for the current county jail expansion project and funding reserves for future
jail expansion,
Even though a majority of county jail inmates are not residents of Port St. Lucie, it is
important to recognize that public safety is the result of a collaborative effort of all the
law enforcement entities within our county. I submit to you that the collaborative,
committed and continued efforts of Port St. Lucie Police Chief John Skinner, Fort Pierce
Police Chief Eugene Savage and myself have played a key role in keeping Port St. Lucie
and its residents safe.
The fact that we have a jail to house people who victimize city and county residents is a
key factor in maintaining public safety within our community, Another aspect of this
collaborative effort takes place with the prosecution of those arrested. The Clerk of the
Court, the State Attorney's Office and Public Defender's Office all playa vital role in
resolving criminal matters.
As you know, a large portion of the collected Public Building Impact fees go toward the
capital improvements for these entities. In my opinion, if the City of Port St. Lucie
declines to collect the Public Building Impact fee, one result would severely hamper the
effective accomplishment of government's top priority, which is maintaining public
safety.
Therefore, I respectfully request that the City Council reconsider its position to terminate
the collection of the St. Lucie County Public Building Impact fee. In my opinion, an
expeditious resolution of this matter would be to add the Public Building Impact fee to
the current law enforcement impact fee. In doing so, you will ensure a continued
governmental commitment to provide a safe environment for all community residents to
make a living, raise their families, and enjoy our beautiful surroundings,
As always, my staff and I remain available to answer any questions or concerns you may
have.
Sincerely,
Ken 1. Mascara
Sheriff of St. Lucie County
"
'-'
_'~U~<~ ~,,~u,,_<^<, ,
~:-~(,'~''''''~U~ '~'~'~'~""~"~;~~
':,,' ~" Uj :" u", '~,
.
.. ." .
2005-06 Budget Overview
81. Lucie County
Doug Anderson, County Administrator
July 5, 2005
MILLAGE RATES
Fund
General Fund
Fine & Forfeiture
Total General and F&F
1992
3.4438
4.3393
7.7831
Current
4.1248
3.3178
7.4426
Financial Recovery
. We have a Financial Deficit at this time of
$12,980,107 prior to increasing Emergency
Reserves to the new Recommended Level.
. The $8,400,000 in Emergency Reserves needs to
be increased to $12,826,899 based upon a survey
of Local Governments.
'.,I
FY06 Budget Summary
· The balancing of the proposed 2005-2006 budget has been
difficult
· Primary reasons were hurricanes' recovery, growth,
increased costs, unfunded mandates, and inflation,
· The budgets in the General Fund and Fine and Forfeiture
Fund were balanced with an estimated property val ue
increase of 13% and 18% respectively. Final property
values came in greater which will provide dollars towards
the emergency reserves and financial recovery,
· Growth Does Not Pay Far Itself
~
81. Lucie County
Hurricane Reimbursement Update
As of 6/13/2005
· Total Estimated Damage
· Total Estimated Reimbursement
· Total Estimated County Liability
· County Reserves
· Total Shortfall/Deficit
$121,398,140
$108,418,033
$12,980,107
$8,400,000
$4,580,107
Financial Recovery
. Emergency Reserves prior to Hurricanes
$8,400,000.
Recommended Increase $4,426,899
Total recommended
Emergency Reserve
*(5% of Operating Budget)
1
'-"
Financial Recovery
· Financial Deficit
· Recommended Increase
In Emergency Reserves
$12,980,107
$4,426,899
· Total Financial Goal
$17,407,006
Scenario
. Years needed at 23% increased property value to
achieve financial goal. /,/''---''--O'',,)
. Financial Goal I ;/
10% (amount over 13%) =3.1 Years /
. '
//' ..
1 % Increase in Property Value
Fund
General Fund
Fine & Forfeiture
1 % Increase
$556,707
$447,785
..",
Financial Recovery
Balanced Budget with a 13% Property Value
Increase.
Property values estimated increase is 23% or 10%
greater than bud~ted revenues.
. ,.10% = ~74 Additional General Fund Revenues
. ~ = $~ Additional Fine & r iture Revenues
j).z~92-y
te~ i .~«Tn property values equals $556,70
for th neral Fund, $447,785 for the Fine & Forfeiture
Fund.
Scenario
· Last Year we lowered Fine & Forfeiture millage
rate by .1368 mills or $1,846,334.
· .1000 mils = $1,660,081
, .
Adjustments
· County Reserve 2nd Jail Pod
· Clerk of Court Building
· Walton Road Complex
(2nd Floor)
· Hurricane Debt interest
payment and Misc. expo
Total Adjustments:
$1,400,000
$710,442
$300,000
$710,000
$3,120,442
~.ß
~tI r
f r~ ~.rV
,)
~
i:lJ
'¡# ! 11
l' J)/ ~.
pO (?b'~
l'
~ /lI, ~
(fl
2
'-'
23% Increase Property Values
Fuod Budgeted Financial TotalE't.
Recovery
General $7,947,264 $4,857,125 $12,804,389
Fund
Fine & $8,350, 125 $1,948.924 $10.299.049
Forfeiture
Erosion $175,467 $134,955 $310.422
Mosquito $658,333 $182,870 $841.203
Control
Total 517,131,189 57,123,874 $24,255,063
Fine & Forfeiture Budget
· Effective 07/01/05, counties are required to fund
the cost of Juvenile Detention care for Juveniles
who reside in the county. The budget includes
$1,883,280 for this pUlpose.
· Also budgeted $500,000 for Juvenile Assessment
Center (JAC) Booking Pilot Program for case
management.
Corrections (Jail Pods)
· The first of the new jail pods will come on
line August 1,2005.
· A second new jail pod is scheduled to be
completed on September 1,2005.
· The estimated 2005/2006 operating cost for
the second jail pod is $2,521,113.
· Recommend establishing 6 month county
reserves of$I,400,000 to go towards
funding the second jail pod.
I V~~ J. - p,:::,"1/, " "3
I Ý þÍJ, ~ t/¿)
....,r1.,J /1," "3
....",
County Operating Departments,
Constitutional Officers, & Outside
Agencies' Budgets
2005 2006 200; Percent
Budget ~ Recornm. Change
BOCC Ad Valorem $76.104,141 $81,190.817 $81,190,817 6,7%
Clerk of Circuit Ct.. 3,600,612 1,935,226 1,935,226 -46.3%
Supervisor of Flections 2,227,695 2,787.863 2,787,863 25J%
Sheriff 45,368,709 53.524,578 53,524,578 18.0%
Tax Collector. 4,733,266 . 5,567,362 176%
Property Apprniser 3,548,670 3,833.619 3.833,619 7.5%
Enterprise &
Non~Ad Valorem 42,572,455 50,037,979 50,037,979 175%
Outside Agencies 2,422,423 2.493,580 2,493,580 2.9%
Tax Collector's Budget is not due until August. The budgeted amount for 2006 is an
estimate based on commissions, and not a request fium the Tax Collector.
.. Clerk of Circuit Court 46.3% budget reduction is because the Clerk did not submit
a budget for the non-court related budgets only Clerk to the Board (Finance). These
are now budgeted out of excess fees.
Law Enforcement Budget
2005
Budoet
2,285,290
24,790,419
18293000
545,368,709
2006
Requested
2,654,435
29,624.917
20977541
553,256,893
Percent
Chao..
16.2%
19.5%
14,7%
17.4%.
*Estimated Budget Impact - $7,888,184 over FYOS or 17.40.10
General Fund Reserves
. Recommend $1,000,000.
. Same as past 5 years' budgets.
· Emergency Reserves budgeted at $2,783,537.
· Budgeted $1,600,000 to Employee Salary
Adjustment which includes Salary Study.
Contingency $ 1,000,000
Emergency Reserves $ 2,783,537
Salary Adjustments $ 1.600,000
TOTAL $5,383,537
· Estimated Budget Impact - $5,383,537
3
'-'
Payments to Community
Redevelopment Agencies (CRAs)
· Tax Refunds to Port St. Lucie CRA
2004 2005 2006
Proposed
$259,601 $466,271 $675,000
$223,511
$415,815
$483,112
$882,086
Estimated Budget Impact, PSL- $342,914
$550,000
$1,225,000
Property Value Increase vs CRAs
. Property value/Ad Valorem Revenues
went up 23%, however, we had to
reduce the revenues by 1.1 % due to the
Revenue Refunds to the CRAs.
Non-Mandated Outside
Agency Requests
2005 2006
Budget Requested
Healthy Start 57,600 57,600
211 Info. Crisis Srvs 11,392 15,000
ARC ofSLC 43,714 68,000
CouncilonAging* 155,763 186,100
New Horizons' 648,010 680,411
TC Homeless Srvs 25,000 25,000
Executive Rd Table 25.000 25.000
TOTAL $966,479 $1,057,111
· Estimated Budget Impact - $90,632
*Does not include MSTU
2006
Recomm
57,600
15,000
68,000
186,100
680,411
25,000
25.000
$1,057,111
.."",
Payments to Community
Redevelopment Agencies (CRAs)
2004
2005
2006
Proposed
$1.150,000
$288.679
$703,851
$248,547
$576,065
$900,000
537,226
$1,279,916 $2,050,000
.Estimated Budget Impact, FP-$770,084
. Total 2006 Return to CRAs-$3 275 000
Lobbyist
· $115,000 budgeted in the Administration,
Solid Waste and Economic Development
Departments' for lobbying efforts in
Tallahassee for the past three years.
· Recommending $115,000 again this year.
· Estimated Budget Impact - $-0-
Economic Development
Council
· Recommended budget $75,000.
· For the past four years, the County has
contributed $100,000.
· The Economic Development Council
requested $100,000.
· Estimated Budget Impact - ($25,000)
4
'-"
Health Department
Budget
· Requested a decrease of $20,000 ITom last
year's budget of$I,046,500.
· Recommend $1,026,500 for 2005-2006.
. Estimated Budget Impact - ($20,000)
New Positions
· ~
· AdmbU.trlltion
· IT
· Human Rei
· Central Srvl
Comm. Srvl
Cty E:s.t. OfTke
Cultural Atraln
Growth Mgm
MOIquito Control
P.rkI & Ree.
Airport
Puhlic Safety
Public Worlu
Total New POlldona
~
,
3
.63
3
t
I
3
6
US
.6."9
t
3.S
l.L.!1
53.67 Current FT - 8S6
Current PT - 79
Increased Costs
'OIlS '0" Total Inc:reue %
Cho...e
CRAS $2,162,002 $3,275,000 1,112,998 51.5%
Health 1m.· $8,804,301 511,451,551 2.647,250 30.0%
Retirement·· 52,475,090 53,527.436 1,052,346 8.9"10
Salary AdJJSurvey $1,222,776 $3,297.800 2,075,024 169.7%
Clerk. of Court 0 710,442 710,442 lO(lO%
BuIld"'"
Fuel Cod Increa.e $861,140 $1,013,610 152,470 17.7%
Total $15,525,309 $23,275,839 $7,750,530 49.9"/0
·15% increase rate & mcrease In positions.
··9 months budget at state approved rate and 3 months budget at
estimated rate for next year.
..",
Health Insurance Plan
· County's health insurance program
increased 15% plus Adjustment to
aggregate and reinsurance premiums.
· Insurance cost is $11,128,351 or an increase
of $2,248,641.
· Estimated Budget Impact - $2,248,641
UnfundedlUnderfunded CIP
Projects
Project Estimated Funded UnfundedlUnderfunde
Cost d
Special Need, 55,000,000 52,500,00 52,500,000
Shelter" 0
Emergency 56,000,000 0 56,000,000
Operation Center"
Parks & Rec. 53,000,000 0 53.000,000
Admin. Building
*These estimates asswne that these facilities are constructed at the County
Fairgrounds,
Transportation Trust
· Need a new revenue source to fund future
operations.
· Projects were moved to later~ars in order
to fund operations in FY06-l. -
· Will update the Board at Strategic Planning
on suggestions for future funding of
operations.
5
-
~
..."
THE END
6
; '. .~
..
/~,
~v/
(A~ ~
~ ~ I' \ Ú
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
Agenda
Friday, November 19,2004
7:30 a.m" Conference Room # 3
St, Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex
Convene meeting
Roll Call, announcements
Minutes
/1
l1¿~ /'
,-I
)
L~--) I ~ /
j <'
;v'"
I
Hurricanes Frances & Jeanne update
~./ 0 . 0 t::J
1, County's Financial Exposure - 0 / Þ é> (.), ()
2,
Vegetation Pickup Reimbursement - Gated/Private Communiti~ ;è-
'7 I olJ~poo _ ,no ~ /"I#" .e--.....~ 60u ~ elk'· ,,/.-,,€<"I
;, ¡4iÞ? -
,¡.../t¢J~ ~.
Emergency Reserves and Lines of Credit f(èfO(),OD4JJ/
/f -¿.",..,....>
.. ..,. y/'"
3.
"
4,
Insurance Reimbursement/FEMA Responsibility.- p~, ;¿J (),. (;)0" .
0-' J 1 S/t>~ PI ~~o ~t/¿-
~~ "2?7,. pUvJ/f/" I) pèjÇ¡~ ~_.
Special Needs3Þe1ter/~mergency Operations Center~ ~¡f:
ß( t,,.;J/ r,/"l, - H' þ97. . t / ....
~ h,- (::)"..vJ
Tourist Tax - Loss of Hotel/Motel Rpoms ~ £,-/v j1;:k" .
5/Pf C-;) / - -A..~ , p,~ =- / ~~CJ /' ,a
. ~ (A)¡,) ¿.,-v ð[Þ'
Stra egic Planning Session - Hurricane Disaster Recovery Plan, Future
Weather Trends, and Future Budget Impacts - February 17, 2005 @
IRCC/Schreiber Conference Center, Port St. Lucie,
5,
6.
7.
Adjournment
Next CBC meeting:
Decembe~n..l , 004. (.to be discussed) ...
~. ~:Jh...~
¡b!
,
( .......
~
'-'
....."
Draft
~
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMIT'l'EE
Meeting Date: October 29, 2004
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: David F. Samuel, Kenny Hogan, Ron Parrish, Mark Taynton, William "Bill"Casey,
John Knapp, Debbie Hawley, Edward Lounds, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick, Troy Ingersoll
and Carl Hensley.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Paul Young, Sylvie Kramer, Steven Messer, and Linda Bartz.
OTHERS PRESENT: Ray Wazny, Faye Outlaw, Marie Gouin and Doug Anderson.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
Doug introduced Faye Outlaw, who has been hired for the new Assistant County Administrator recently
created and he stated she would cover a couple of the items to be discussed at this meeting.
Faye was hired from the City of Fort Lauderdale, where she was the acting Director of Community &
Economic Development for about 6 years. Before that she had worked for the City of West Palm Beach in
a similar capacity for about 12 years.
Ed Lounds announced this would be the last CBC meeting he would attend as a member. The commissioner
he represents (Barnes) is not running for reelection. Ed expressed the great satisfaction he has had from
serving in this committee. He stated The CBC has come a long way sir.ce it was established and wished the
best to evelyone.
Committee members and staff expressed their regret to see him part with the committee.
MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the August 20,2004 meeting, Ed moved for approval
and Ron seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and the motion passed.
HURRICANES FRANCES AND JEANNE
County's Financial Exposures
Doug poin ted ou t memo attached to the meeting packet which includes a list of the properties damaged by
Hurricanes Frances and Jeanne. He also brought map of the County where he has identified the location
of each damaged property and has also marked them with numbers matching the list, to follow up the
recovelY as closely as possible.
Emere:encv Reserves and Lines of Credit
Doug also spoke about the funds available for Hurricane recovery, which include several lines of credit
(please refer to meeting packet for details).
Insurance and FEMA Reimbursement Responsibility
Faye explained the reimbursement process and how much the insura."1ce will cover (after the deductible),
what FEMA will cover (they consider themselves a funding of last resort) and how much of the costs will be
payed by the State and/ or each of the municipalities (the County),
She also spoke of several percentage increases authorized by the President and the Governor of Florida, as
"'"
'-'
(CBC)
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
SCHEDULE FOR MEETINGS
YEAR 2005
1/ 21/ 2005
2/ 18/ 2005
3/ 1 8/ 2005
4/ 15/ 2005
5/ 20/ 2005
6/ 17/ 2005
7/ 15/ 2005
8/ 19/ 2005
9/ 16/ 2005
1 0/ 21/ 2005
11/ 18/ 2005
12/ 16/ 2005
Note: Meetings time /dates /place: 7:30 A.M,/Third Friday at month/ Cant. Room # 3
·'
...ð1 . '-"
. Iv' >"t - / ."'" .' :> ¿.....41- J
,,--,.,.,.,é
d/-J, ~"'7 ,/.}.I ./ " _
I~" , ~I 4,,¿J6¿/
I/~ 0 'I {> :2Þ?.-,ð~
...,
µloJ
II/I ?/I" A. c",v
C· I:/. vJ, (.
.. {LA'" fJl" 'b
f'/'
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
MEMORANDUM
04-04
TO: Douglas M. Anderson, County Administrator
FROM:
Faye Outlaw, Assistant County Admiaistratõn-~
~
DATE:
November 19, 2004
RE:
Hurricanes Exposure and Liability
Attached is an updated damage report from Hurricanes Frances and Jeanne. The
County's current estimated loss including building, content, revenue and other costs is
$101,381,482.
Of that amount, the potential liability to the County is $10,926,843, This includes
$7,095,992 in change orders from the Indian River Drive project, $2,100,000 in debris
removal from private roads/gated communities, the 5% local cost share of $1,527,045 and
some incidental costs.
To date, hurricane insurance claims have been submitted for a total of $22,962,862. We
have received one insurance payment of $3,000,000 at this point and expect another
$3,000,000 payment in the next two weeks,
FEMA has signed off on the first batch of project worksheets for a total of $2,900,000.
The second batch of project worksheets is currently being reviewed for a total of
$4,600,000 and should be signed off by FEMA within the next two weeks. FEMA expects
the reimbursement turn-around-time to be a minimum of six to eight weeks.
In addition to our Self-insurance Company and FEMA, we will also receive reimbursements
from the State, the Federal Highway Administration and the Federal Aviation
Administration.
FO
Attachment
"
'w
~
Total Estimated County Exposure as of 11/18/04:
$101,381,483
Projected County Reimbursement:
· Self Insurance Company
· FE11A
· State
· Other
$ 15,471,305
$ 30,193,701
$ 1,613,440
$ 43.176.194*
$ 90,454,640
Projected County Liability
$7,095,992 from Indian River Drive
$2,100,000 debris removal from private roads
$1,527,0455% local cost share
$ 10,926,843
* Federal Highway Administration, Federal Aviation Administration
~
êl~l~ 21~ I...·~ ~. ~c If ~
~IEI~ ,,3: Iz :; I~ " :t> ~.
mlolP'!~ ¡': ~!: 5~ Ie
;U I m ~ ~ '::-1 :=: ~. ...J
I (/) [J) v
1 I» j
¡
~...... .. ~ r)~ ~!
!º ,- ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~
... ...J¡cr;,::; ;;;:¡ '-'i:3í
OJ
I ¡
"5 »~I~ - - ~
XI :J1 .....~. ~ .
!5;l! ~~~J1I~ §~
:5 ::; ..-_ :..... ""'I'f.,
o ~ g - ~ I~ ;2 5@
¡~ 10 W ,.,
..... r\.:> I..... __1,_ 'k .~~=
~ g g :¡~¡~i~!~I~I'~iil
~ªLª~ð5Õ
i~ ..... I....,¡
;: ~'l! ~ ~....,¡
,J ~~ g ìd)~
¡
~ _ 0'1 o~
~ i~ ¡ ! ~ !~' I,~
~1' 1
..... (0..... ! 1.....··>.1"!'I
:::::> ::I) .t>. .;;;,¡ ..... . " I:', XI
~ ~ ~ ;2 ~ § ~J~!~!~lâlj~ ~ ~
~~~It~~
1 i
.
. "TI
0.;
...
< »
~~ ~
enO
c:C:
;;oZ
<::I
mm
-<en
I
NNNNN
<DCD--JO>(]'I
en"':r:c~
::T 0 iii' 0 0)
~ ;:¡ .-0 -I ::!.
-' -0 :J
=t -' ~. en CD
en~O)mO
»0-»
a.CD~rg¡
3C:~~ro
5' CT u. c ..,
_. .., CD en
en 0) c CD
~-< 3 c
~. 3
o
:J
N
.þ.
r
0)
;1';'
CD
:E
o
o
a.
-0
0)
..,
;1';'
r
õ'
..,
W
-<
NNNN-"
WN-"O<D
:::o-l~:r:~
° Q) 0 c °
~::!1~ !a. 3
o c ° 5'
SC'Oro;::;::J1O
roc ° roen
::!. = () .., õ:
S-e:O~CD
CDcÈ~OC:
a::Tg"
- 0)
~ -<
õ:
5'
1.0
00
roro
W W
:J :J
a. a.
CD (1)
.., ..,
.þ.-,.þ.
--J 0 -'
o-,.þ.
°s:en
~CDCD
. 0 W
s:0.:E
ä:'<~
:ErO
W W
'< ~ :2'
:::0. (1)
o ."
~~
zen¡!:);:gcr¡~
IOo o~
cwen (]'I
.-c (1) eno
g. en 0) W ro
5' ~ ~ ~ W
en W '< W:J
g'< 0 rog-
CD...., ~-,
en ::!. <' CT»
wo.(1) W <
:J1O- .., (1)
a. CD 0)
:::0
°
W
a.
{;fl{;fl{;fl{;fl{;fl
~ ~...... N (J'1
OtOt-"O-"
- NOt- -
0- 00
00000
00000
00
{;fl
W
N
0>
N
-0
0)
1.0
CD
{;fl {;fl {;fl
(]'ICDOt
000
000
000
-'
{;fl{;fl{;fl{;fl{;fl
0-"00.þ.
N -"
o
0>
--J
W
{;fl{;fl{;fl{;fl{;fl
....JI.úJ~N~
W-'O(]'lW
Ot-,CDNOt
OWOOO
00000
o
{;fl {;fl {;fl {;fl {;fl
--J-"O>-'--J
Ot ---J 0 j,.. Ot
°NOOo
<DOO
<FI<FI<FI(J)(J)
00000
{;fl {;fl {;fl {;fl {;fl
--J-"O>-"--J
Ot·--J o·.þ. Ot
°NOOO
<DOO
-"
-"
-
-"
CD
-
N
o
o
.þ.
o
o
o
{;fl
Ot
.0
Ot
o
o
{;fl{;fl{;fl{;fl~
-"O>-"NW
NOOOo
o,oOt°o
00000
0000
00
~
N
N
<D
~
CD
o
o
~
W
0>
W
-"
CD
{;fl~{;f}{;f}{;f}
~O'1-""-Jrr,.O
OWO<D
Ò><D.þ.-"
OCD-"CD
O>CD--JW
0> CD
{;fl
-"
N
<D
--J
o
~~{;f}~{;f}
-"O>--J-"N
--J :... .þ. --" <D
OWNO>N
(]'I-" ww
W
~
--J
N
-"
~~~~{;fl
<D w.þ. 0>-"
(]'I.þ.-".þ.O>
-" O>N
(J)
o
(J) (f) (J) (J) (J)
00000
{;f}
--J
f\,.)
-"
~~~~~
<D W.þ. 0>-"
(]'I.þ.-".þ.O>
-" O>N
W-of\,.)
0(J).þ.
grâ
~ s:
(1) Q
:J
S'
1.0
en
ä:
CD
ro
<'
a.
o
;:':!
-0
~~
.þ.f\,.)
- .þ.
~CP
.þ.
'-r'
-"
CD
~m~~~~:::â<DCD~
--J0>(]'I
» ro
:r::r:'-OO-l en-oooOOOO
CD CD coo ::!. ~ ¡¡j C ° ro .., ro <' CD
0) W (j¡ 0 3 CT .- CT C .., ~ .., _0' :J
;::;:;::;: C C<CD=;:¡;1';'-';1';' ~
::T::Tª,33:J<»0::T:::o~o()~
OOCDCD§CD~:+OgCD -CDen
CDCDO~;::;:ro~Om.eno~O~CD
"0 "0 0 en'< c en 3 CD CD 0 0 0 CD =2
r+r+c enÕ: CD:J»O)enc'"
~ » ;:¡ Q CD 5' '< g- :J g ~;:¡ g'
-(j¡ ðw =21.0 "':J:J3 en
~. clO('J CD :::0
"'Oen(1)CD x ~ CD
:;u CD en ~ 0
a. I 0
0)
.-
õ'
:J
NNW
NWO
-,O--J
en°-'
-<0
6.~' ro
_. -' W
W :J :J
:J DJ a.
:::o»~
<' <
CD (1) ~
..,' (1)
o
..,
<'
(1)
en
°
o
o
C
:J
-<
»
:J
:J
(1)
X
O~
~. 0
(1) z
~
o
o
C
:J
~
º
C
0"
.þ..þ..þ.
WWW
Ot--J--J
zzz
s:~ :::
:J (1) --J
~ ª »
!::!:
:;uCD--J~~W
o.og:::T::T~
(J) (J) (J) Õ'
~~~»<
(1) (1) (1)
~~~(1)
N.þ.NN
O....JI.....JI.....JI.
O-'O>CD
(J)(J)(J)(J)
f\,.)NNf\,.)
:J :J :J :J
0..0.0.0.
(J)(J)fJ2(J)
r1'" r-+ ...., .....
CD ro m ro
(1)(1).-CD
.-.- .-
{;fl
W
W
·0
o
o
{;fl~{;fl{;fl{;fl~~{;fl{;fl{;fl{;fl
W--J-,W--JNOO>O>WW
woOt·oof\,.) <DCDW--J
-OtOo,OO-O "'o"'oNCD
000000 OON.þ.
000 0 OO(]'lO
O.þ.
{;f}
o
{;fl{;f}{;f}{;f}{;f}{;f}{;f}{;fl{;fl{;fl~
o NOf\,.)OOO(]'l.þ.-"O
N N WCD(]'I
0> (]'I W (]'I.Ot
--J N f\,.)00
0> OO>N
0>
{;fl
f\,.)
<D
--J
o
o
{;f}{;fl{;f}{;fl{;f}{;f}{;fl{;f}{;f}{;f}~
W.þ.-"O>O>-"O-"-"-"W
ONW--Jw<D .þ.--J(]'I.þ.
--" 0, Co W 0 ·CD -" (]'I _<D .0
(]'I<D(]'I 00 -".þ.(]'I(]'I
ONO 0 N(]'IOO>
N.þ.
~
-'
m
(]'I
o
~{;fl~{;fl{;fl~{fl{;f}{;fl{;f}{;f}
.......N--JWW.......O--J<DCD.......
o>W--J--J(]'I....... CD--JCDCP
--J 0> Ot 0 0 .þ. (]'I 0> -(0
(]'I 0> 0 -"N
o
(f)
o
(J)(J)(J)(J) (f)(J)(J)(J)(J)(f)(J)
00000000000
~
-"
m
(]'I
o
~~~{;fl~~{;fl~{;f}{;fl~
.......f\,.)--JWW.......O--J(OCD-"
o>W--J--J(]'I....... CP--JCDCD
--JO>(]'I 00 .þ.Oto>Co
(]'I 0> 0 .......f\,.)
o
{;fl {;fl {;fl
-" f\,.) N
"'0 W.O>
OCD.þ.
0(0-"
OON
00
00
{;fl
0>
o
_0
o
o
o
{;fl {;fl {;fl
<DNO
O--J
.0> W
(]'I CD
WN
f\,.)<D
0>
{;f} {;f} {;fl
CDNN
.þ..þ.W
- w·
-". --J
NO>--J
-"0-"
--J
{;f} {;fl {;fl
.þ.-'-"
o>_W W
--JOtf\,.)
WW-"
.þ.
(f) (f) (f)
000
{;f} {;f} {;fl
.þ.-"-"
m.w W
--J(]'IN
WW.......
.þ.
..."
(]'I.þ.
»
oro
roW
W 0
:J ;1';'
0..-0
CD CD
ë;,~
roro
=2 °
õ' ~
(1)
(;):::0
W W
.., 3
0)"0
1.0
CD
W:Jf\,.)
00.0
~ DJ (J)
:J (1)
0:;uw
ro _. :E
W < W
:J(1)'<
0...,-
(1) 0
.., ..,
~
(1)
{;f} {;fl
N -"
o Ot
_Ot _0
00
00
00
{;fl
(]'I
.0
o
o
o
{;f}
-"
.<D
<D
--J
o
{;f} {;f}
f\,.)0
o
f\,.)
(]'I
(0
0>
{;fl {;fl
.þ.-"
--J W
- (]'I
-" .
0>0
.þ.0
o
{;f} {;fl
.!"--J
0> (]'I
NO
00
Wf\,.).......
»»»
1.0 1.0 a.
O~ ê.
CD CD :J
:J
.-roro
~ c c
õ:=
_. a.
:J -.
1O~
CDCDN
.þ.OW
O<DO
°zO
-o<D:::;;
õ· .-. ....,
o ::T to
en (J) :J
:::0 ~ Dr
o ro »
w~<
a. ~
"tJ
;;0
°
'-
m
o
-I
en
-I
;;0
c:
o
-I
c:
;;0
m
r
°
(")
~
o
z
{;f}~{;fl en
Nf\,.)-" -Ie
.CD .0 ~ 0 ;;0
88·0»0c:-
ooo!::;!o~
0»....-1
(j)mc:_
m;;o~~
~
om
ï°-l
OZ3:
en-l»
oom-l
Zm
-10
{;fl
CD
CD
o
~~~z
.0 .O>.CD en
.þ.CP-"C:
.þ.WN;;o
.þ.f\,.)f\,.)>
Z
o
m
{;f} {;f} {;f}
-" N .......
O>CDO
.(]'I (]'I.(O ."
<D-"o>m
f\,.) to!:
0»
{;f} {;fl {;f}
(0.......0>
N(]'IoOO
f\,.)CD(O-I
.þ.~
m
(J) (f)
00
(f) <FI (f)
000
{;fl {;fl
.!".--J
0> Ot
NO
00
;;orn
ïm-l
0<3:
oom
enZ~
C:m
me
°
-I
:I:
m
;;0
~~~
(0-"0>
f\,.)(]'I0
f\,.)CD(O
.þ.
"tJ
mO
x-l
."m
OZ
en::!
c:»
;;oï
moo
ï
o
.
."
:;0
°
'-
m
(")
-I
m
e
;;0
m
~
ro
c:
:;0
en
m
~
m
Z
-t
en
m
(J)
-t
-
s:
):-
-t
m
a
::I:
c
::;0
::;0
-
C1
):-
z
m
r
o
(J)
(J)
-
""C
::;0
o
(..
m
C1
-i
m
CJ
::;0
m
-
s:
m
c
::;0
(J)
m
s:
m
z
-i
-
):-
z
a
C1
o
c
Z
-t
-<
r
»
OJ
-
r
-
-t
-<
~
w
"'tI
;;0
(]I (]I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w w w w w w w w w w w w 0
..... 0 <D CO -.. 0) (]I ~ W N ..... 0 <D CO -.. 0) 0) (]I ~ ~ W N ..... 0 t..
OJ » OJ » m
("')
-I
(,)(")ï (/) -1:::0 C ~~ ~~ ~~ C ::I: (/) -I (")(/) (")(/) (") ;:, "00 "00 :::0 ~ ~ (")"T1 (/) ~ (/)
;::¡'OQ) Q) .., (1) :2: ~ m tÕ' .., o Õ o ..... c .., (1) .., (1) 0 (1) r+ Õ ;:r
';""3=E < (1) (") (1) Q) (1) Q) (1) Q) Q) ;:, Q C- O C" o C" ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡
~ Q) ..... Q) ..... Q) ..... ~ ~ ::J ::R ::J .., <" ñ) (") ~"'O Q) < (1)
"'O::J Q) (1) .., .....(1) .....(1) .....CD ~3 ~3 CD "'0 .., "'0 .., 7' <C <C ..,
::J 0(1) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ;0 (") ::J (1) -. CD -. (1) -. ::J CD ::ij
-=E I I ~ º-=E º-=E ;::¡. -ª;; -ª;; ;0 (1) (1) .., (1)
CD 0 ::J Q) ~ CD (J) ;0 Ò "'0 (") U> en
x 0 Q) 3 cï (") -I "'0 (J)Q) (J)Q) 0 G) G) .., ..,
-=: c.. U> 0 ~Q) ~Q) ~Q) .., ~ Q) ùS' ~ro ~m <' CD CD Q) .., ..... CD 0 CD :r: -I
Q) ::J ::J "'O~ "'O~ "'O~ CD ::J CD 3 3 a. CD (1) (") "'0 U> Q) ;;0
::J "'0 ;0 <C» ..... (1) ::;. Q!. c .., c:: .., .., CD CD CD .....
Q.Q) CD ñ3 -CD -(1) -CD U> (") (") 0 0 (... ::J ::J 0 -ª ::J e
(") CD .., Q) =E Q) =E Q) =E ;0 ..... ..... 0 < < ~ 3 (Q ("')
c:: .., ..... CD (") ~Q) ~Q) ~Q) CD ;0 c:: c:: .., Q!. Q!. ;0 CD
0.7' CD Q) ..... 3 CD .., .., <' 3 ..... -I
CD ;0 CD ro ro ..... CD CD CD e
Q a. CD "'0 CD I I 0 c::
U> CD ..... .., .., .., 0 Q "'0 "'0 ::J :;0
mQ õ' (J) < ::;. .., c:: (") ~ m
::J CD Q U> <' ~
::J CD - ~
~. Q » < Q) ë'ï õ'
en ~ .., (')' ro ::J
CD
0 Q CD
::J U>
..... ~ en z I ~ r C C ~r mr en c c <D <D 0) ~ .þ. N
(.ù .þ. 0 0 º- -a Q ::J ::J CD Q Q Q CD ::J ::J 0 (.ù 0 ~ 01 <D
0 0 c:: ;::¡. 7' ~¡jf U> ^ <" 0 (]I 0 <D N 0
N <D s: ëi 0 CD ::J ::J ~CD ::J ::J N 0 0
::J" Q =E () () en=E ~ () () Z z !='>
< s: ë!: 0 0 o =E 0 0 !='> (J) -
I I '< 0 ::J
::;. " -a .., CD 0 o 0 .., .., ~ CD
<C ëi c:: c:: "'0 Q 0 "'0 3 8- 0.8- ;::0 "'0 "'0 ;::0 " ::J 0 <' a. I"'"
:E ñ ñ a. 0 0 0 0 0 0 9: c:: e
S' S' ~. .., .., S' "'0 Q) .., .., () CD s: ~ ~
5ï Q) ::J" ::J" CD "'0 Q) Q) (")"'0 a. Q) Q) 7' a. Q) (")
'< ..,
S" S' U> S' Q) ro ro o Q) Q) Q) ro ro CD ::J ~ ~ »
» U> .., m'" ::J .., S?<> ;::0 .., ;::0
;::0 U> 0 a.. 7' a.. a.. 7' Q) 7' a.. a.. 0 ~ ;::0 .., 0 -I
< 0 0 () CD ~ Õ
~ ::J ::J U> (") (") () (") () Q) <' CD Q)
Q) I
a.. - 0 0 Q) Q) 0 0 a. CD r a. Z
U> U> c:: c:: ::J ::J c:: c:: :E .., CD
¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ ::J ::J Q) Q) ::J ::J '< 0 " (.ù
.....
::J -<: -<: -<: -<: .., "'0 ..,
::J ..... <' a.
a. a.. 0
0 CD
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ en
(]I ~ ~ N ~ N ..... .... N (.ù .þ. N N (.ù ~ N .... N N (.ù .... .... (.ù -.. -I~
0 0 0 (]I co 0) (.ù _0 .co .... (]I (]I (]I .!" --.. .... .<D _0 (]I ..... 0 (]I
..... 0 0 (]I _0 .01 (]I .... .0 _0 !=' .... _0 .(]I C :;0
0 0 0 0 0 0 <D 0 N 0 0 0 »Oe-
-.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <D 0 0 (.ù <D 0 0 0 0 0
0 (]I (]I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 _(]I 0 0 N W 0 0 0 0 0 ~ -I ("') ~
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 <D 0 0 (]I 0 0 »:r:-I
0 0 <D 0 0 0 G)~e_
N 0 m :;On
m¡:
~
("')g}
1"'"0-1
OZ¡
en-l»
enm-l
Zm
-Ie
~ ~
.... _<D ;;orn
..... .þ.
N N ïm-l
w .... o<¡
(]I enm»
enZ-I
em
me
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ {;f) {;f) {;f) ~ {;f) ~ ~ {;f) ~ {;f) ~ {;f) {;f) ~ ~
N 0 0 0 .... N 0 0 0 .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... 0 0 .... .... N 0) Z
(]I 0) 0) <D -.. ~ ..... ~ ~ en
N co .~ 0) 0) ..... N 0 -.. e
(.ù (]I (.ù _0 ~ -.. (.ù (]I N ~
(]I (]I ~ 0 (.ù ..... -.. co 0)
0 <D .þ. co N
0 to Z
0 .þ.
(") "'tI
m :;0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ {:fl {:fl {:fl {:fl {:fl {:fl {;f) {:fl {:fl {:fl {:fl {:fl {:fl {:fl {;f) e
N to N N ..... 01 ..... <D N 0 0 N N (.ù 0 0 ..... (.ù N N ..... N (]I .<D (...
(.ù 0 N N 0 <D N 0 (]I N N ..... 0) 0 0) -.. (]I (.ù (.ù N m
-~ 0 (]I <D N 0 ..... 0 N .(]I .(]I .(]I N .þ. (.ù 0 to 0) .þ. ~ 'T1 (")
(]I .þ. .... 01 <D (]I 0 0 0 0 0 ..... <D 0) 0 (.ù (]I co -.. m -I
N 01 ..... 0 -.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 -.. .þ. 0 (.ù :s:: m
-.. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 » c
0 :;0
0 m
~ {J) {J) (F) {:fl (F) (F) {J) {J) (j') {J) {J) (j') {:fl {:fl {J) {J) {:fl {:fl {:fl {:fl {:fl {:fl {:fl ~
..... 01 ..... ~ 01 (.ù 0) 01 ..... 0 0 ..... ..... ..... 0 0 co ..... ..... ..... co ..... N 01 OJ
(.ù 0 N N -.. (.ù -.. 0 .þ. N N .-.. .þ. 0) .þ. (]I co (.ù <D ..... en c
0 0 01 -.. N 01 0 0 01 01 01 _01 <D 0) 0 01 ~ -.. .þ. -I ;;c
N (.ù ..... 01 0 0 0 0 0 0 .þ. 01 0 ~ en
<D 0 0 0 0 0 (.ù m
0 m :s::
m
~ {;f) {:fl {:fl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... ..þ. 0 0 0 (.ù 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -I
..... .... _(]I 0 en
.þ. 0 0
_0 0 0 -I
0 '0 _0 J:
0 0 0 m
0 0 0 ;;0
0
~ ~ ~ ~ {;f) {;f) ~ ~ ~ {;f) ~ ~ {;f) ~ {:fl ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ {;f)
..... (]I -.. ..... (]I (.ù 9> (]I ..... 0 0 ..... ..... ..... --.. N co .... ..... .... co .... N (]I "'tI
(.ù 0 0) N -.. (.ù -.. 0 .þ. N N .-.. 0 ..... ~ 0) ~ (]I co W <D ..... me
0 0 N -.. N (]I 0 0 (]I (]I (]I <D 0 (]I <D 0) 0 (]I .... -.. ~ )(-1
N w co 01 0 0 0 0 0 _(]I 0 0 ~ (]I 0 "'tIm
CD ex> 0 0 0 0 0 W
<D 0 0 OZ
<D 0 en::!
N 0 e»
;;oï
men
ï
("')
"'0
Q)
<C
CD
N
.....
.....
-
....
ex>
-
N
o
o
~
m
CJ)
-t
3:
»
-t
m
C
::I:
c:
:::c
:::c
()
»
z
m
..
o
en
CJ)
~
""C
::0
o
c...
m
(")
-I
m
C
::0
m
-
3:
to
C
::0
CJ)
m
3:
m
z
-t
»
Z
C
()
o
c:
Z
-t
-<
ï
-
»
m
-
C
-t
-<
-...¡
01
o
o
m
W
:J
CD
W
'<
CD
o
W
a
:E
W
;¡;¡:
-...¡
-Þ-
o
c-
:J
a.
-..
õ'
C/)
W
<
W
:J
:J
W
en
CD
C
ä:
:J
(Q
-...¡
W
'-"
-...¡-...¡
N -"
-...¡ 0> 0> 0> 0> 0>0>0> 0>
OCOCXI-"'¡~~o1-Þ-W
0>0>0>01
N-"OCO
\J3~ØSCD~~~~O~CD~\JI~
ñï"'O 0 a 3' æ ~. iiì iiì ~. ¡:¡¡ m ñï W ~ W W
~0~c~o~a.a.~w0°iiìw~~
en C c :J m ::T -.. a: a: -. 3 ;t> Ã < 9: 0 0
0:J~a.0mooo:J_-..\J=enC:J
-.. a. 0 en _. en C :J :J a. W m m w m -.. 0
~~0~~ ~~~~~w~\J\J~03
à :J 0 m \J en w w OUI .... W W _.
~~:J"'OW a.a. v CD-"-":J3
"'" ~ w -.. -. _. ::;; w 0 Ã Ã m~
£~a~Ã cC0~ w C
ä:-..- 330 ~ ~
5' ~ I C ~ ~
(QË ~ in w 0
-.. m m 3 m
m ¡¡¡ "'0 ~
m
-..
g>~~·¡;fOd6'.g~~
cn3-"~NQJË-"01
gmi%8'Qg Cl.301~
;t>"(Jca..,QJ CJ>s
......\JO., ol2O;;ffi'§ =
;t> 0 c CD _. :r .,
:E !:! -.. ~. c: () :J üï "
()-'~m(/)nOmre
.,go:J......ogCD
~!:!::Tæ 30<~
QJ¡p -.. ()::¡.a.w
~~ ~5' a.
o -t>Q.
:J .,
Õ
\J
w
(Q
m
W
(f)
o
(ß
01
-Þ-
o
o
o
(ß
W
o
o
o
(ß
o
(ß
W
o
o
o
-"
-"
-.
......
00
N
o
o
-Þ-
(ß
0>
o
o
o
o
~
n
o
x
^
õ'
en
Ã
(ß
-"
o
o
(ß
-"
W
01
o
o
o
(f)
o
(f)
o
(ß
co
o
(ß
-"
N
-"
01
o
o
(ß
01
~
0>
-...¡
01
o
(f)
o
(ß
o
(ß
01
(ß
0>
-...¡
01
o
(ß (ß
o>w
-"0
00>
o -"
O-...¡
N
-...¡
(f) (f)
00
~~
O1N
-Þ--...¡
CO 01
001
001
01
-Þ-
~~
W-"
001
o1.w
00
00
0>
~~
00
~~
W -"
001
o1W
00
00
0>
-"
01
0>
o
-"
O!-Þ-NC/)
N-Þ-01m
O!O~w
0::T:E
z"CJ>w
~w~'<
\J ~. re 0
CD _. ...... :::!.
W:J <
o a. m
o en
~o
OJ ::!.
-<
< ()
a.
~
~
Ci
:E
W
'<
~
a.
~~~(ß
-"'¡N-"-...¡
0>0101-"
010010>
OOOW
000CX>
000
o
~~~~
o1-"'¡W-"
-"""CO-...¡N
00 .01 0 01
N-Þ-oo
w-Þ- 0
cx>o1
-"
(f) (ß
-" -"
W 0
o-Þ-
o -"
o -"
01
~
00
.CX>
-...¡
W
-...¡
~~
-"0>
N -"
0>0
NO
-" 0
(f)~(f)(f)(f)(f)(f){F)(f)
OOOCXICXI-Þ-WOO
o -" - -Þ-
w01~9
O>CO-"'¡o1
OCOWN
wO
01
~~~~~~~~~
O>N-"O>-"O>-þ-w-"
CX>NWO>O>COO>W-"
CX> 01 CO.W 0 0 -Þ- W N
O1OO1COWCOWOO1
OOoCX>OOW 0
00-" OW
o
~~~~~(ß~~~
W-"-"'¡WCX>WN-"o>
CX> N-...¡ 0> COCX> O1CX>N
N -01 "c.n "ex> -" W '"-...¡ 01 01
O1OOCX> CX>CO
OOCX> WO>
~~~{:I){:I)~~(ß{:I)
000000000
(ß~(ß(ß(ß(ß~(ß~
W-"-"'¡W01WN-"O>
CXIN-"'¡O>01CXI01CXIN
NO!"c.nÒ> CO W'"-...¡ 01 01
01 0 OCX> 0> 00 CO
0000 WO>
NN;t>-"
0>0<-"
NNmo
NO:JCO
OC-C~
_ C m _.
()w::::oa.
W :J :::o.(Q
:J ~ m
a.W~;t>
~»m<
OJ<:Jm
_men:J
< :J -. c
a.cOm
m :J
~(ß~(ß
CX>WCX>N
O1-...¡wo1
00001
000
o
{:I)
N
N
01
(f) (f) (ß {:I)
OOON
N
01
0>
o
~(ß~~
COW-"'¡N
O>w'".Þ.o>
CX>w-...¡-Þ-
000>
(ß~~(ß
o1-"-Þ--"
-Þ-CX>-".t>-
O101-'''¡
{fl <fl (ß (ß
0000
(ß (ß (ß (ß
o1-"-Þ--"
-Þ-CXI-"-Þ-
O101-'''¡
01010101
CXI-"'¡ 0> 01
0~0\J
0,< 0 C/)
;:¡3r
~mg:\J
\Jrifig
W~a.-
~m:E;/o
~C/)
::T ::T
:::c
w:Ð
wm
0-
o
W
-..
a.
"wi
01
-Þ-
01
W
01
N
\JZ\JC/);t>o
WOW 0 < C
-";:¡-"cmM
à ::T à ~ :J v,
g:'0 ~ffi~
~ê ê~3
~en en 0
W m m ::!.
3:E :E !!!..
-OW W \J
'< '< W
¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ ~
ñï ñï I
:J :J
a. a.
W01O>\JNC/)N-Þ-
.t>-OOC/)O......-"-"
-"'OOr°.;vco-Þ-
WOJ 0C/) Z ~» 0 CJ>
W -"Zm
-"m- <». W
iiìwii m c:E
o (Q -. :J C/) W
o-"W en -,,'<
c~:J:E 0
(Q m ~ g Õ ::!.
~ Ç? ~. a. ~ ~
~ _. ., r N
¡:¡¡ ~ 0 W 0
() ., :J
~ :;::. CD Z
CD
~~(ß~
o1-Þ-OCO
ON 0
001 0
o
(F) (f) {:I) ~
0000
~~~~
.t>-WOCO
O!CXI 0
OW 0
01
~~~~
NNOO1
01-" 0
o
(ß~(ß(ß
0000
~(ß(ß~
NNOO1
01-" 0
o
~
co
_0
o
o
o
~
-"
o
o
01
(F)
o
~
CX>
-'"
o
o
o
(ß
.t>-
O!
o
o
{:I)
o
(ß
-Þ-
ë.n
o
o
~
-Þ-
N
.01
o
o
o
{fl
o
(ß
W
00
N
01
o
o
~
N
-"
N
01
o
(ß
o
(ß
N
-"
N
01
o
-"
W
o
0>
»
<
CD
:J
C
CD
~
(ß
-"
o
o
-...¡
01
o
C/)
~"
e ;;ou
:ÞOC-
:¡¡: ~ 0 "'~
:þJ:-I
(j)~C_
m....~g
Qo
om
rO-l
OZ§:
C/)-I:þ
C/)m-l
Zm
-Ie
~m
r-m-l
o<§:
en~:þ
en -I
Cm
me
(F)
o
Z
en
c:
~
Z
o
m
(ß
co
_0
0>
-...¡
01
'T1
m
:¡¡:
:Þ
~
01
o
W
CX>
C/)
~
-I
m
~
o
o
-I
J:
m
~
(ß
01
o
W
00
"0
mO
)(-1
\Jm
OZ
en:::!
c::Þ
;;or-
mC/)
r-
o
"0
;;0
o
C-
m
o
-I
en
-I
;;0
c:
o
-I
c:
;;0
m
m
en
-f
-
š:
»
-f
m
C
:r:
c
;0
;0
-
('")
»
z
m
r
o
en
en
-
"'C
;0
o
c...
m
('")
-f
m
C
;0
m
š:
OJ
c:
;0
en
m
š:
m
z
-f
-
»
z
c
('")
o
c
Z
-f
-<
r
-
»
OJ
-
r
-
-f
-<
r-
o
o
:Þ
-I
Õ
Z
"0
;;0
o
c..
m
o
-I
m
e
;;0
m
~
OJ
C
;;0
C/)
m
3:
m
Z
-I
C/)
C))
......
I\.)
o
G)
W
a.
CD
en
o
~
6
=I:
;:0
o
III
a.
{f}
I\.)
o
o
o
'1J
III
10
CD
.þ.
{f}
o
{f}
......
00
o
o
{f}
......
o
o
{f}
o
{f}
......
o
o
......
......
-
......
00
-
I\.)
o
o
.þ.
<0
---I
<0
C))
;:O(f)
° °
° =
-.. a.
(f)(f)
3 Q.
III _.
_a.
ëñ:¿
:::Till
CD en
a. ......
CD
;:0'
o OJ
° ~.
....... ==:
::J
10
ï1
III
Q.
.z
:¿
III
en
......
CD
,
OJ
III
5'
10
ï1
III
Q.
.z
C))
......
I\.)
o
G)
W
a.
CD
en
o
~
6
=I:
;:0
o
III
a.
{f}
I\.)
o
o
o
{f}
o
w
......
00
o
o
{f}
......
o
o
{f}
o
w
......
o
o
<0
01
<0
.þ.
<0
""
<0
I\.)
~(f)O(f)ï1(f)::O(f)(f)
->.Q.OOQ.OOQ.OQ.Q.
Ic.:3c.:º,c.:0c.:c.:
° ~~ :¿~:¿3~:¿
3 00 CD 00 00 00 00
~ en en en en en
:ECP ro ro roro
::J ï1 ' I "
CD...., š:: OJ O(f)
ü! æ iii' ~ g ~
o ~ 5' ëD' CD
iii' 10...., :::T
"tJ CDO
o ::J s:::
en (') en
00 CD CD
T
C)) C))
...... ......
I\.) I\.)
o 0
G) G)
w W
a. a.
CD CD
en en
o 0
S. s.
6 6
=I: =I:
;:0 ;:0
o 0
III III
a. a.
{f} {f}
...... I\.)
~ 0
C)) 0
o 0
{f} {f}
o 0
{f} {f}
...... ......
W 00
...... 0
.þ. 0
{f} {f}
---I ......
"" 0
o
{f} {f}
o 0
{f}
---I
""
{f}
......
o
o
C))
......
I\.)
o
G)
W
a.
CD
en
o
~
6
=I:
;:0
o
III
a.
{f}
""
o
01
o
o
o
{f}
o
{f}
I\.)
---I
..þ.
01
o
o
{f}
......
01
I\.)
01
o
{f}
o
{f}
......
01
I\.)
01
o
(J)
......
I\.)
o
G)
W
a.
CD
en
o
~
Ò
=I:
;:0
o
III
a.
{f}
CJ1
o
o
o
{f}
o
{f}
.þ.
01
o
o
{f}
I\.)
01
o
{f}
o
{f}
I\.)
01
o
'-"
<0
......
<00000000000
o <0 00---1 (J) 01
s:š::š::š::c:s:
-. _. -. -. ....... -.
en en en en CD en
(')(')(')(')10(')
. . . . s:::'
0000.000
III 00 III 00 ...., III
33330.3
00 III 00 llI-oo
10101010°10
CD CD CD CD :E CD
en en en <h CD I
_. ...., en
10 en (Õ"
::J-::J
en ~ _en
CD CD
?> 9"
(J)
......
I\.)
o
G)
W
a.
CD
en
o
~
6
=I:
;:0
o
III
a.
{f}
_---I
01
o
o
2S~~~(f)::!;1
5-~::¡'OJOJ~
CD !P.. !!!. æ æ ~
:::!.. III a. (') (') _.
'<::JCD:::T:::T(')
a. OJ ;>\
g' CDOJOJO
..., 00°°0
10 (') 00 III s:::
III :::T ..., ..., 10
0.0._
iii' :E :E 00
III III en
OJ ;;¡=;;¡=OJ
CD CD
III III
(') (')
::r :::T
{f}{f}{f}{f}{f}{f}
w.......þ.......W01
000""0001
""---1""000
I\.) 00
o
{f}
C))
00
.þ.
.þ.
{f}{f}{f}{f}{f}{f}
000000
{f}
01
<0
o
{f} {f} {f} {f} {f} {f}
WCDW<OI\.).þ.
.þ.(J)<OO---l<O
010100001
o
o
{f}
""
""
{f} {f} {f} {f} {f} {f}
......011\.)01......1\.)
<O.þ. I\.) 001 00
o
o
{f}
o
{f} {f} {f} {f} {f} W
000000
{f}
""
""
W {f} {f} {f} {f} W
......011\.)01......1\.)
<O.þ.I\.)001oo
o
o
{f}
......
{f}
---I
.þ.
{f}
o
W
---I
.þ.
00
.þ.
00 00
"" I\.)
,
~
10
s:::
00
a.
-
°
:E
CD
...,
s: '
iii' ~
~ 10
s:::
o 00
00 ....,
3 a.
III -
10 °
CD :E
, CD
en ....,
(Õ' en
::J W
_en ........
CD
r
ï1
...,
CD
a.
CD
...,
ëï
;>\
o
o
s:::
10
W
en
OJ
CD
III
(')
:::T
'1J "U
CD CD
"tJ "tJ
"tJ "tJ
CD CD
..., ...,
'1J '1J
III III
..., ...,
;>\ ;>\
{f}
......
01
o
o
o
{f} {f}
...... I\.)
......
~.o
o 0
o
o
{f}
->.
""
01
W
o
{f} {f}
o 0
W
I\.)
""
{f} {f}
->. ->.
---I 00
01 <0
01 0
o
o
{f} {f}
<0 ......
00 0
01
o
o
{f} {f}
o 0
{f} {f}
<0 ......
00 .0
01
o
o
0000---1
......0<0
..",,¡
<O<O-OO»C::;:
->. ->. ° 0 ::;. S
............:E0"tJë:
, I CD :::=0 ° (')
mm""~::+1lI
OOenI ......
00 N g'O
-- ::0 °
G) 0 00 ë: CD<
CD III a. 5'
::J"" -'10 ^
CD ~ ° en -.
....,...... (f) °
00........ '< en
Õ ~;>\
~ CD
3
...... ......
00
1\.)......
ZZ
::0::0
o 0
(') (')
;>\ ;>\
::0::0
o 0
III III
a. a.
{f} {f} {f}
............ ""
WO I\.)
00_<0
000
00<0
01
{f} {f} {f}
000
{f} {f} {f}
......<01\.)
......0<0
---laC))
00......
o 00
C))
{f} {f} {f}
C))01......
O10(J)
00::..
01
01
{f} {f} {f}
000
{f} {f} W
(J) 01 ......
01 0 (J)
o O-.þ.
01
01
---I ---I
00---1
---I
C))
~
8'
::J
(f)
(')
...,
s:::
0-
OJ
s:::
ë:
5'
10
?8"g~b
'Ù::::!!Z<:;'oo
°iboCDO
::+tn;+ \D
@':::T g>
g:~ ~
::J» ::r
......
:::QJ ::J
00S: c..
QJ ãï
@ ::J
::J ;;0
no <'
CD
....,
{f} {f}
"" I\.)
0101
_00
00
o
o
(A
I\.)
......
---I
o
o
{f} {f}
1\.)0
I\.)
00
""
o
o
{f} {f}
<01\.)
01\.)
001
00
o
{f} {f}
01 ......
01\.)
001
o
{f} {f}
.þ.0
""
~
o
o
{f} (A
01 ......
01\.)
001
o
{f}
......
W
01
o
{f}
o
{f}
I\.)
.þ.
""
o
o
{f}
......
""
01
o
{f}
o
{f}
I\.)
---I
o
o
o
(b
ea~~
»-IC_~
S::I:0
»m-l
":;eC_
m ~ ~
SIlO
orn
,a::!
a~s:
(bm»
(bz-l
-I~
:;ern
ïm-l
a<§:
(bm»
(f)Z-
Cm
me
z
(b
C
~
Z
o
m
"T1
m
s:
»
(b
-I
»
-I
m
a
-I
::I:
m
:;e
"tJ
ma
x-l
"tJm
o~
C/);
C,
:;eC/)
m....
o
"tJ
:;e
a
c...
m
o
-I
en
-I
:;e
C
o
-I
C
:;e
m
m
en
-I
-
3:
>
-I
m
C
:J:
c:
;;C
;;C
-
C1
»
z
m
ï
o
CJ)
en
~
"'C
;;c
o
c...
m
C1
-I
m
c
;;C
m
-
3:
m
c
;:;u
en
m
3:
m
z
-I
~
>
z
c
C1
o
c:
Z
-I
-<
ï
-
»
m
-
r
-
-4
-<
....
a
o
»
-I
Õ
Z
"tJ
::0
a
c...
m
o
-I
m
e
:;e
!!!
s:
to
C
:;e
en
m
s:
m
z
-I
C/)
~~~~~~....Io.~~
1\)1\)1\)1\).........................
WI\)..... 0 tOOO.....,0>01
:r:ô-:r:oeneno"o
m::TI:O¡¡)OOO)(
3 :J 3. § :J ~ 3 '0 g-
~g¡£-<ro~~~:E
-o:J"C:om""m
00 0 ro ro 3 c: ~ :J :J
ro ;;; :r:;¡¡ ro :J :E ~ :S.
~ 00 o-<;:;:ena
"C::Jwen::T_:J
WOO:J_ 0
:;!.rom......nr:::...,3
~ -"'" .....Wm
OW9, CO:J
03c: ronr
00'03
úi ro
ä:
to
en en "
»>8'
..........00
»»:::0
o
w
~
;z
»
.....
»
I\)
W
o
o
<
cã'
5'
iir
»
<
~
{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß
........../\,)...............,00101
000.þ.0CJ1 00
"'.Þ."'.Þ.o.....,oo 00
0001\)0
00 "'m0
o
o
"
w
ca
m
01
{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß
000000000
{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß
coco..........coO>O.þ..þ.
wwoowo--"¡ 0101
0>0>01\)001 00
000010
W
.þ.
o
{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß
CJ1CJ1.....--..¡CJ1WOI\)I\)
I\)I\)0WOoo 0101
ooomo
W
o
{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß{ß-Eß
000000000
{ß{ß-Eß{ß{ß{ß-Eß{ß-Eß
CJ1CJ1.....--..¡CJ1WOI\)/\,)
I\)I\)OWOOO 0101
ooomo
W
o
~
~
;:
)
)
)
)
~....Io. -1rr......
~....Io.....Io. .....
.þ.W/\,).....
C::Joo
aQ-~!:.
m -. W <
C-. 0 ro
-. en :r: ;4.
3 ° g
ro::Ten
~. g ro
~ -
ca:r:
m 0
roc:
-00
~m
I\)
01
::;
en
-
...,
m
m
-
Z
»
.....
»
.þ.en
O1ro
co -
o :s.
en¡;¡
!:t:::o
< 0
-. W
¡;¡~
Qo
o
W
:J
!!?.
{ß{ß-Eß{ß
CJ101WW
00001
o A· 0
0_
00
00
o
{ß{ß{ß{ß
1\)01\)0
o co
o -
0>
.....
(X)
'-'
..... -1rr. ~...............
.....00000
o «) 00 ....., 0> 01
.....
o
I\)
{ß {ß
011\)
001
- 0
a.
00
00
o
00
I: I:
«
ro ro
;4.;4.
.....
o
.þ.
.....
o
W
oos::men"eno
!:.!:.iiï-!:tm 0:::01:
< < ° 3' ro ~ --..¡ ~
~3.D!!a.;::-W;4.
c: ~ cõ' Qo_
< ::T(j)w
roõ'- iñ
;4....,00000
:::O".........::T...,
ro...,Zwm
'O~Q.3-g
¡¡j' £ :::0 s-
£00 o~
~- ~õ
:J
-
en^
w -.
< :J
wca
:J 00
:J :r:
W :E
::T,<
:::OQo
o
W ï
~w
"
m
¡¡j'
:J
~
s:;en
W c:
ca :J
:J ~.
o 00
~m
W »
W <
-m
S:;'
m Qo
3.0
-w
-:J
Ow
;:;:-
° .....
::To
{ß {ß <n <n <n {ß
000000
<n <n <n <n
I\).þ.W--,,¡
--"¡CJ1.þ.(X)
00.þ.--..¡
01
o
{ß{ß{ß{ß
.....1\)1\)0
0001
.00.0
000
000
000
{ß <n <n <n <n <n
..... 01 I\) .þ. 01 0
-' 0> I\) 01 (J)
I\) tv 01 0 tv
0101 0001
00000
<n <n <n <n
.....I\)......þ.
O101COw
--..¡
01
<n <n <n {ß {ß <n
(J)W.....I\)WO
1\)..... tv 01:""
01 I\) 01 0 I\)
01 0 0 01
<n {ß {ß {ß
0001\)
0>
I\)
01
o
o
<n <n -Eß {ß
.....I\)......þ.
O101tOw
--..¡
01
{ß <n
w.....
--..¡OO
01"""
001
00
o
-Eß {ß {ß <n
.....,..........0
010100
- o--..¡
o.
0001
000
00
{ß {ß -Eß -Eß {ß {ß
O>w.....l\)wO
1\)..... tv 01"'"
01 I\) 01 0 I\)
01 0001
:J
°
r=:
~
m
~
5'
I
.....
:::o^o'O ^»
o -. c: 0 _. <
w:J<;4.:Jm
~ co m -. to .
00 ..., 0 00
:r: - 2. :r:
~ Qo~
...... en.........
><" mo
(j) 0"0
..., W c:
W OO:J
::T !:!:-<
W ~ 0
3 :E
:J
m
~
{ß
I\)
01
o
o
o
o
{ß
I\)
01
o
o
o
o
<n
o
<n
o
<n
o
<n
01
(J)
tv
01
o
<n
o
-Eß
W
.....
I\)
01
<n
I\)
01
o
o
o
o
<n
.....
00
--..¡
01
o
o
<n
o
{ß
.W
.....
I\)
01
{ß
W
01
.0
o
o
o
-Eß
úJ
.þ.
.....
o
o
o
<n
(X)
.....
o
o
<n
.þ.
01
o
<n
o
{ß
.þ.
01
o
.....
o
I\)
ro"Dro
I: ¡¡¡. c: ~
=-m:J
~~m~
5' 00 :J 0
ca ..... 00' ...,
:::OQoiñæ
rol\)_"
'0 - W
mo:J5(2
° 0 ~...,
ro:J c:
3 ° s¡
rom c:
:J 00 m
-!!!. 00
o
:J
mz-
-000
"'=;4.!:t
00 ::r ~
,,»-
w.....E;
~»m
I 00
o
:J
S
I\)
01
o
m
¡¡j'
:E
W
m
{ß {ß
.....--..¡
01.0
001
00
o
<n <n
00
<n <n
..... (J)
úJ_úJ
CJ1.þ.
001
o
<n <n
--..¡ úJ
01-
01
I\)
01
<n <n
00
{ß {ß
--..¡W
010,
I\)
01
'"wi
..... .....
00
.....0
zeno>
c: 0 .....
° c: I\)
ii)::;o
~»ø
".....w
o»~
:E z m
rooo
~;4.c:
... ::r _
¡¡j' 0 '
::1-..0
-,,~
":::0
ïO
W
~
<n
.....
o
o
o
o
<n
01
o
o
<n
o
<n
01
o
o
«)
«)
roenroen
-0-0
ca _ca _
~ä::uä:
cg~g~
00 en -.. 00
CD CD
± ±
w W
~ ~
<n
o
<n
_co
o
o
o
<n
01
o
o
to
00
~
00
CD
~
00
CD
0>
.....
I\)
o
(j)
¡¡j'
~
m
00
o
~
Ò
~
:::0
o
W
~
<n
.....
o
o
o
o
en
c ~g
»OC_
~-fO¡
»::C:-fj
G')!¡!C_
m""~g
Qo
om
r-O-f
OZ-
en-f3:
enm»
z-f
-f~
:;om
r-m-f
o<i:
enm»
enZ-f
C:m
me
<n
o
z
en
c:
~
z
o
m
<n
co
o
o
o
"
m
š:
»
<n
01
o
o
en
;!
-f
m
<n
o
o
-f
::c:
m
:;0
"
mO
)(-1
"m
OZ
en::j
c:»
:;or-
men
r-
o
"tI
:;0
o
c..
m
o
-I
en
-f
:::0
c:
o
-f
c:
:;0
m
m
en
::!
š:
»
-I
m
o
J:
c:
;u
;u
-
(')
»
z
m
r
o
en
en
..
"'C
;u
o
c....
m
(')
-I
m
o
;u
m
-
š:
m
c:
;u
en
m
~
m
z
..-I
»
Z
C
(')
o
c:
Z
-I
-<
r
5>
m
-
r
-
-f
-<
r-
o
o
»
-f
Õ
Z
"tI
:;0
o
C-.
m
o
-f
m
e
:;0
m
~
CD
c:
:;0
en
m
š:
m
Z
-f
en
.,
'1J
Q)
o
<D
0)
15 m
~. ~
<D <D
~t£
::J 0-
...... :=.:
~~
::r-'
<DE
<D !:.
:::-: ...,
(Q <D
6'3
=-<D
.:<~
üï !II
CII
c: m
mtB'
Q) 6'
::J =-
0.':<
s: (ñ'
<D CII
o.C:
<D <D
Q) _ CII
=I:~Q)
<D 3 ëD
o _.
-::JQ)
::T Q) ~.
<D g !!!.
(")::JtE
o 0 Q)
c: ::J ::J
::J_o.
~ ffi ::e
CII (") <D
§:0Q)
_. c: -,
3 ::J <D
~~íii
<D CII ~
<D 3 ::J
>< (0
"O~Q)
000
CII::r~
c: :E 0
~ == ~
-I
_::r
o <D
-, -,
<D !!!.
CII 3
º-o-
< c:
<D -,
_CII
::r<D
<D 3
CII <D
<D ::J
iii' ......
CII'U
c: -,
<D.2.
CII <D
. 0
»~
o.g
o.CII
a:Q)
o -,
::J <D
!!!.o-
-Q)
~ CII
-<D
::ro.
<D c:
(")'U
o 0
c: ::J
::J _
.:<::r
<D
<D <D
>< ><
"0"0
<D <D
~o
CII -
Q)
o~
o
CII ::J
c: .....
,..L:;,
1'::::>09
~'J
",",'
Q) -I
CII ::r
::T <D.
<D .
,<0
.....
Q) ::r
::!. <D
CII -,
~ '1J
-,
-0
::J~'
<D
""'0
::r _
<D <D
o 0.
Q) :::0
CII <D
<D -.
o 3
...... 0-
-c:
::r-,
<D CII
_<D
::J 3
e:<D
Q) ::J
::J íii
:::0:
-. 0
< 0
<D -
-, c:
03
-, ::J
<' -,
<D <D
'U::!!
-, <D
,0 Q.
ëiï CII
o Q)
-::J
Q) .....
::J õ'
0. -.
_ 'P.
~
~
\::J
)-
-,
(¡J
c0
-
~ Q!.
íii~
~ §:
<D õ'
X ::J
'U»
<D 0.
~3
Õ 5'
..., ü)'
~ ~
CD ~
<' 0
<D ?
g~
~<D
~ ~.
<D =
3' 0
0-0
c: ~
~ S'
<D c:
3 <D
<D .....
::J 0
-<D
......x
0"0
~ Q
tB'<D
ã'!2.
~mffi
0::e-'
0.02'
Q) -, ::J
'< '" 0.
CII 0 -.
o°tE
-3
::T"'Q..g
<D<D"O
o.mo
Q)o.;:¡
3 :E §
~ ~ a:
~=j'm
0)
......
w
"".:>.
~
o
-EI)
~
w
(")
o
3
3
<D
::J
-
!'!
<n
......
9
CD
N
0)
00
~
W
-1r.-tr.-1r.-"'-a.-a.-1r.
wwwwwww
.......,O)01~WN......
-J
-'" -'" ...l. -1r.
WNNN
OCDoo.......,
-' -' -'
NNN
0)01~
g>ñji~QCIJ»(")crzc:::oCIJOZ<
"0 >< 0 <D ffi3o.!!! ::Jo ~<D O-Q) 000 Q)c:::
<D 'U-' ~ :;T-'3C:=-'
.., (") <D '" ~. -. ~ 0 <D <: Q) - 3 3 ;::;:
< 0 0 =t ::J .~ - :E 0 ,.., "0 ::r 0
ëii' = ~ ...... CII ü, -, ::J 0 -, ~ CII ""' Q) Q) ::J
<D - "Uo"'o",,"::J::J
00 »(")O-'Q) Q) o.-_IC'"'Q) lDo.:::o
-'..... 0<D_ ::J::r""c: '<0
o 0 :g c: 'U <' ~ '1J =;- <D :::.. CII <D ID 0
......-,-,;:¡.Q)<D "",Q)Q)-'C:<DQ)~,,,
m Q) -. "-'CIIO-CII::EOw CII
- - .....» 0"'--,<DQ)::rQ)
<D CII 3- 3 -'Q)c: 0
~ ~ <DO ~::J3'<'1J::r
-. ::J::E 3 - 0 ID Q)
g -Q) c: ~::roo~
CII ::J::J <D m 0 Q)
g ~ R--'
CII
-f
o
~
r-
en
-EI)
co
CD
co
~
0)
CD
~
CD
-EI)-EI)-EI)-EI)-EI)-EI)-EI)
~OCON-'-,O
".to. -'W01oo
CD W co 01 _0)
o ~0101N
0)-,. -'
w~o
~
-EI)
......
-EI)~-EI)
W~N
CD'N01
.......,~.......,
01~01
~
.......,
N
o
.CD
o
00
co
-EI)
N
N
_01
~
~
~
-EI)
-'
01
"".:>.
.......,
......
-EI)~-EI)-EI)-EI)-EI)~
WOOOOOO
co
w
.......,
......
.......,
w
o
01
{f)
w
_0
......
co
oW
.......,
o
......
YlYIYIYI-EI)-EI){f)
.......,WooNO......O
~OO~...... 01
00 N ë.n _01 ......
ooON01 .......,
coO) .......,
...... N
-EI)
......
-EI) -EI) -EI) -EI) -EI) -EI) -EI)
~N~......OOO
m ~ën_"""
co co
0).......,
0)
-'
.......,
0)
-EI) -EI) -EI) -EI) -EI) -EI) -EI)
0000......00
01
01
.01
N
co
~
-'
CD
~
<n<n<n<n<n<n<n
J>.NJ>.-'OWN
...... -' Ò> .-' J>. ___
o)NCDCD J>."-I
0)"""" WO
0) 00
,
-EI)-EI)~~
0-'0......
00 N
~ 001
01 0
o
o
-EI)
01
.......,
N
01
~
N
-EI)
-'
-'
.......,
o
o
0)
o
~ -EI) -EI) -EI)
0000
YI -EI) YI -EI)
0......01......
ën---~
0) 01 .
...... W 01
o
o
-EI) -EI) -EI) -EI)
OCDNO)
N 00-
O)N
01
o
~ -EI) -EI) -EI)
0000
<n <n <n <n
-'CDNo)
oNoo'N
0) 0)01
o 0
CIJ
(")
Q)
c:
CII
<D
:E
Q)
'<
ëii
¡¡¡-
::J
0.
f.l>CIJf.I>
»»»
-' ...... -'
»»»
-EI) -EI) ~
~~è5 ~n
ggg~o~~
ooos:~O¡¡
>m2j
~:;O~g
Qo
o~
r-O-f
OZ§:
en-f>
enm-f
Zm
-fo
:;o~
r-m-f
0<-
enmS:
enZ>
c:-f
mm
o
-EI) -EI) -EI)
000 Z
en
c:
~
z
o
m
{f) YI YI
w......O)
O)oow
000 "
000 m
000 s:
>
-EI) -EI) -EI)
N......W
ooë.nen
00 0 ~
000 0#'
-f
m
-EI) -EI) -EI)
000
o
-f
:I:
m
:;0
<n <n (f)
N-'W
"0"00,
000
000
"tI
mO
x-f
"tIm
OZ
en::!
c:>
:;or-
men
r-
o
"'C
:;0
o
c..
m
o
-f
en
-f
:::0
c:
o
-f
c:
:;0
m
m
en
-I
-
3:
>
-I
m
C
::I:
C
:;0
::;0
-
o
>
z
m
ï
o
en
en
..
-c
:;0
o
e-
m
o
-f
m
C
:;0
m
-
3:
OJ
c
::;0
en
m
s:
m
z
-I
»
Z
o
o
o
c
Z
-I
-<
ï
»
OJ
-
ï
-
-f
-<
r-
o
o
>
-f
Õ
Z
"tI
::0
o
c..
m
o
-f
m
o
::0
!!!
s:
D:J
c:
::0
en
m
3:
m
z
-f
en
..
~
'-"
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
Agenda
Friday, October 29,2004
7:30 a,m., Conference Room # 3
St, Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex
Convene meeting
Roll Call, announcements
Minutes
-----
Hurricanes Frances & Jeanne update
1. County's Financial Exposures
2, Emergency Reserves and Lines of Credit
3, Insurance Reimbursement Responsibility
It 1II0w;L
~r/.L :1. ~
k~J .J ~
~ I- ~~.
4, FEMA Reimbursement Responsibility
5. Special Legislation Legislative Requests
6, Special Needs Shelter/Emergency Operations Center
7. Tourist Tax - Loss of Hotel/Motel Rooms
8. December meeting - reschedule to December 10,2004,
Adjournment
Next CBC meeting:
NovembeÇ, ~~
~ I ~.
{ ~\V I (' .
'\ 1'"1 I ~ ~f1
V II \ \ I'. VI
\~ t~\
¡ ·tR:)m~'r,T
t ,OC~_2_ ~~~O~;
lOG,):. f\DMitt OFFICE
'-'
.....,
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
Agenda
Friday, October 29,2004
7:30 a.m., Conference Room # 3
St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex
Convene meeting
Roll Call, announcements
Minutes
Hurricanes Frances & Jeanne update
1. County's Financial Exposure
2, Emergency Reserves and Lines of Credit
3. Insurance Reimbursement Responsibility
4. FEMA Reimbursement Responsibility
5, Special Legislation Legislative Requests
6. Special Needs Shelter/Emergency Operations Center
7. Tourist Tax - Loss of Hotel/ Motel Rooms
Adjournment
Next CBC meeting: November 19, 2004
....""
'-'
Draft
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: August 20, 2004
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Ron Parrish, Mark Taynton, William "Bill"Casey, John Knapp, Debbie Hawley,
Edward Lounds, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick, Carl Hensley, Linda Bartz, Steven Messer.
MEMBERS ABSENT: David F. Samuel, Kenny Hogan, Paul Young, Sylvie Kramer, Troy Ingersoll.
OTHERS PRESENT: Jennifer Hill and Doug Anderson.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
Doug announced staff was going to have a meeting at St. Lucie West (at the Schreiber Conference Center
at IRCC/FAU St. Lucie West Campus ), the next day (Saturday), to discuss site plan design concepts for the
Research Education Park. Several local political leaders, top people of the University of Florida and other
personalities are invited to attend.
MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the June 18, 2004 meeting, Carl moved for approval
and Linda seconded the motion. AU members present voted in favor and the motion passed.
Regarding the July 2,2004 minu tes, staff clarified that under" Jail costs and Overruns", paragraph 3 should
read "...to date, the Board of County Commissioners has approved $20.5 MM.....
Debbie requested clarification in paragraph 1 under "Capital cost to construct a low-tech housing Facility..."
Phrase should read "Staffs recommendation is option #1 (metal building, at a cost of $216,000 each -
excludinJ;!; aÌ1' conditioning), two buildings...". Staff took note of the corrections.
There being no further corrections to the minutes for the July 2,2004 meeting, Linda moved for
approval and Ron seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and the motion passed.
Update on CBC's recommendation re2ardine: Sherift's issues
Doug pointed out exhibit A in the agenda packet (please refer to August 20, 2004 agenda packet for details)
and went over the decisions the BOCC had made to date regarding the SLC Jail overcrowding.
Committee members and staff discussed different aspects and possibilities to reduce jail costs based on the
decisions the BOCC made. CBC members also expressed their concern for the need to begin planning for
a new jail (an additional jail facility to meet the inmate population growth), not to fall behind again in terms
of capacity.
Mi11a2e Rates
Doug referred to exhibit B in the agenda packet and explained the proposed millage rates for the next Fiscal
Year. Committee members expressed their concern of the impact of lowering the millage rates and the
impact it would have on the County's budget.
Recent accomplishments
Doug referred to exhibit C in the agenda packet, which is a list of projects, goals and objectives we are proud
to have completed and we tend to forget about because we are focused on the ones ahead.
""
-..,
'wi
Members discussed the possibility of having future CBC meetings at some of the sites mentioned in the list.
After discussing several projects, members agreed to meet at the Research Center in the near future.
Hurricane Hazard
As the projects were discussed, Doug mentioned a few staff members had gone to the Florida West Coast
to observe the impact that Hurricane Charlie had on those communities. He stated they had taken pictures
and put together a presentation for the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners to make them
aware of the possible consequences a hurricane would have in our community if it were to hit here.
Committee members and staff discussed some of the emergency procedures staff would follow in the event
of a hurricane.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC regular meeting is scheduled to be held on Friday, September 17, 2004 at 7:30 a.m., at the
research Education Park (Note: this meeting was canceled). Topics to be discussed will include County's
Contingency, Reselves and Emergency Funds levels.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 8:55 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, SecretalY
William "Bill" Casey, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Mecling
August 20, 2004
H\O SecretarylO OMBICBCIMin\08 20,wpd
page 2
'-"
..."
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
MEMORANDUM
04-197
TO:
Board of County Commissioners
FROM:
Douglas M. Anderson, County Administrator
DATE:
October 15, 2004
RE:
Hurricane Jeanne Status Report
Attached are Hurricane Jeanne Status Reports from each County Division. A summary of
Hurricane Frances and Hurricane Jeanne estimated costs are provided below:
Unincorporated Private Facilities (Preliminary Estimate)
(Homes, commercial, and industrial buildings)
Frances
($ Millions)
740
Jeanne
($ Millions)
461
Total
($ Millions)
1201
Unincorporated Public Facilities (Preliminary Estimate)
(Infrastructure, parks, public buildings, etc.)
28
39
67
Debris Unincorporated County Cost (Preliminary
Estimate)
12
8
20
County Personnel Cost (Actual Costs Through Oct. 11)
Total
0.9
780.9
0.6
508.6
1,5
1289.5
Completion dates for major damaged areas in the County are not substantially changed from the
September 20,2004 Hurricane Frances Status Report.
Response time during Hurricane Jeanne substantially improved from Hurricane Frances, Food,
water, and ice distribution began the day after hurricane force winds subsided, This was
accomplished by pre-designating distribution sites, allocating county/city forklifts to the sites, and
staffing these sites with county/city employees.
"
...,
...,
Hurricane Jeanne Status Report
October 15, 2004
Page 2
Special needs citizens were transported to Palm Beach because the County Civic Center was
damaged. Prior to Hurricane Jeanne buildings at the Fairground were provided with generators so
that they could be used as housing after the event. In addition to housing law enforcement and
military personnel, the fairground buildings were used as shelters until October 14,2004.
Providing temporary housing for citizens with destroyed/damaged homes continues to be a difficult
process, primarily due to the time to obtain FEMA approval for placement of the mobile homes, To
date 269 RV's/mobile homes have been distributed to County residents and approximately 1100
have been staged at the Airport,
Debris removal countywide is approximately 40% complete, and conclusion of our debris removal
efforts is expected in November, Debris that has been staged at the Airport and Fairground will be
disposed of through land application of chipped vegetation material, air curtain incineration of
debris, and removal to the Okeechobee landfill of construction debris. .
It is expected that staff will be in the process of administering FEMAllnsurance claims and
completing repairs to damaged buildings and infrastructure for the next 18 months. Although public
buildings and infrastructure repair will be a priority over new development, Growth Management will
continue to accept and review plan submittals.
Hurricane Jeanne had a significant impact on St. Lucie County because of its Category 3 wind
speed, North and South Hutchinson Islands were the most significantly impacted areas in the
County. The most severely impacted buildings were mobile homes.
Although complete structure failures did occur, these buildings were predominately mobile homes
and older buildings. Buildings that were constructed post Hurricane Andrew typically suffered
cladding and attachment damage rather than structural failure, These damages are outlined below
in order of their frequency of occurrence:
1) Roofing material failure (shingles, hot mop, tile, and metal).
2) Aluminum screen rooms and carports (particularly susceptible to failure were typical gas
station "pavilion" structures).
3) Exterior acc~ssories (fences, soffits, roof top cooling and mechanical units).
4) Window breakage (homeowners and business owners limited more extensive damage
by boarding),
The back-to-back Category 2/Category 3 Hurricane events we experienced clearly demonstrate the
effectiveness of newer codes established after Hurricane Andrew. Structural failure was limited in
newer buildings, It should be noted that St. Lucie County has held high "Level 3" rating from the
Insurance Service Organization during the last 7 years for both residential and commercial
buildings,
-....I
'-"'
Hurricane Jeanne Status Reports
October 15, 2004
Page 3
Recommendations to reduce property damage in future hurricane events include:
1) Seek federal legislation to exclude placement of mobile homes from "V" (velocity) wind
zones in hurricane prone areas. Generally these are areas east of US 1 in St. Lucie
County.
2) Work with the Florida Building Commission to strengthen the cladding/attachment
provisions of the Florida Building Code, particularly with respect to roofing.
It is noteworthy that St. Lucie County suffered no hurricane event related casualties during
Hurricane Frances of Jeanne. We believe that strong public relations messages in all medias were
effective in relaying the life safety risks to County residents.
DMA/jc-04-197
'-'
'-'
en
t-
en
o
o
w
z
z
«
w
ï
C
Z
«
en
w
o
z
~
LL
W
Z
<
o
æ
a=
::J
J:
.J
<C 0 0 0 0 0 0
I- 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L() 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
l- I'- O. 0 Ó Iri 0 CO N O. 0 0 0 0 L() 0 L() 0 0 Ó Il'i 0 L() L() O. 0 Iri Ñ 0 O. 0 L() O. 0
0 0 CO L() 0 0) oq- ('t) CO (J) N 0 0 Iri Ó ri ri 0_ 0 0 Ó Ñ Ó ..- 0 ..- 10 It) L() 0 ..- 0 0
..- N N ..- N CO ..- ('t) CO CD N ...... ('t) ..- I'- ('t) ('t) ('t) N ..- CO ..- It) It) N ..- ..- ..- ...... ('t) ..- ('t) ('t)
~ ~ ~ ~ ffl ~ ~ ~ ffl ffl ffl t,c) ~ ~ t,c) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t,c) t,c) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
l-
t/)
0
0
W
Z 0 0
Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
<C 0 0 0 L() 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 Iri N 0 0 0 0 0 L() L() 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ó 0
w Ó 0 ...... ...... It) CO Ó 0 Ó ~ Ñ Ó Il'i 0 Ó 0 Il'i Iri 0 0 0
""') ('t) ai ..- 0 ..- CO CO N CO ..- ('t) ('t) 0 ..- It) L() L() ..- (J) It) 0 ..- 0 L()
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t,c) t,c) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t,c) ~ ffl t,c) ~ ~ ~ ~
l-
t/)
0
(,)
t/)
W
(,) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 Ó Iri Il'i ai Il'i 0 0 Q 0 0 0 0 L() 0 0 0 Ó 0 0 L() 0 0 0 Ó O. O. 0 0 0 O. 0
Ó Ó O. 0 - 0 O. 0 It) Il'i 0 O. 0 - - 0 Il'i Il'i Ó Il'i
u.. I'- L() 0 ..- oq- ..- a:! Ñ ri Iri ri 0 0 0 N 0 0 ...... 0 0 L()
I'- N N ..- N L() ..- ('t) ('t) ..- ¡:: ..- ..- ..- ('t) N 0) CO ..- L() ..- ..- ..- L{) ..- ...... ('t) ..- ('t) N
~ ~ ffl ~ t,c) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ffl ~ ~ t,c) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t,c) ~ ~ ~ t,c) t,c) ~ ~ ~ t,c) ~
a..
.-
0) ....J LL
L- en
Q > "'0
.¡: a.. co 0)
Z L- 0) Q 0 >
0) > "'0 "'0 'E a.. .¡:
0 > .¡: .D > a::: a.. co ('t) .- Q I
~ ~ Q =' ã'.i e! 0) 'C .- 0 LL
IV t5 IV - C) c: I.L. 0) L-
L- a.. ai a::: ..,j 0)
IV c: ~ IV 0) .- .- ...... Q) ~ co 0)"'0 co ai ~ 'C
"'0 .- .- ...... ...... ~ ëñ > fU co Q) >
0 > ...... .~ ~ .~ Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) "'0 .D > .- ~
0) co ~ ~ ~ ~ L- ._ L- .¡:: c: 0 æ ~
0 <{ 0) 0 "'0 L- a::: Q) > ~ ~ Q) ëii u. L- co L-a:! Q co ro a:::
Q) .- L- .- û5 « L- c: g 0) Q>, c: ~ û5
.J .~ L- a::: c: "'0 co Cf) û5 Cf) û5 û5 û5 =' 6 "'0 a:! 0 ~ ...J .¡: c: 0)
en I~ c: ~co ~ :Q l::I 'C
c: 'c .~ 0 0 c: co II) .- .J::. co
c: II) "'0 "'0 "'0 'c ~ II) 'õ 0)
I'~ 0 co .~ "'0 ~ .J::. .J::. .J::. U u IV co .- ~ ~ c: ~ =' 'S; .-
.l: co 'C c: c: c: c: .- ...... ...... "'0 L- L- L- c: :ë 0 0 U.
L- ...... 0 ~ Q) L- c: N c: N N co ...... ...... ...... a::: ~ 0 ~ Q) 0) 0) co co Q) co ~ "'0 Q) ..- c:
:> 0) ã: Õ :> N :i Q) ~ 'C "'0 Õ en Q) II) 0 Q) Q) c: Cf) Cf)
en en :Z =' L- Cf) æ - :E
z Q) Cf) en Cf) z z z c: c: =' Cf) Cf) z
0 0 ..- 0 c: Q) 0 co co co ..- It) 0 0 0 N
0 0) 0 Cf) ...... 0 ..- co CD ..- 0 ...... ...... ...... It) 0) :É 0 ..- 0 Q) 0) ...... 0 oU ::I: oq- ..- 0 0 N 0) 0 L()
('t) 0 ~ 0 0 ('t) N ..- ..- ..- 0 ..- ('t) ("') ('t) ~ ~ It) oq- 0 õ õ 0 co N . Z ..- 0 ...... 0) L() ..- 0 ('t)
N co co N ('t) N N N N oq- N ..- oq- ~ oq- N N ('t) ('t) ...... oq-Cf) oq- ..... oq- N oq- ..- co 0)
L-
0)
......
w ~ Ig c:
0)
a:: ~ ~ U
:J e! "'0 § c: I~
I- co II) Q) a::: ·S 0
co U ~ L- E +:;
(J a::: ø x Q) ~ II) L- a:! .D ~ e! c:
:J 0 =' Q) x ::ï =' E ='
Q) 0) .~ 0 IV ..5: Q) e Q) - E
a:: - g L- =' II)
I.~ co 0 c: L- e! ~ .D II) I~
g Q) .J::. ~ c: .J::. g ..:.:: 0) L- 'c ~
I- 0 .~ c: ~ Q) t: c: ::ï 0 - ~ L- L- =' .D E
t: <{ 'C .9 c: II) 'E
t/) a:! :§ en <{ c: co .g¡ ~ ::ï 0 c:
;g ~ 0) L- =' c: en =' êi 'ª Q) 0 32 a.. =' c: 0)
c: I~ 0 e! "'0 ~ - U
~ Cf) .g¡ 0 0) ~ II) 'S ~ U c: ....J Q) 'C co II) ~ ~
=' L- II) L- L- ...... U "'0 .¡: "'0 Q) <{ ::I:
=' Q) co L- c: Ü =' Q) 0 .g¡ a:! c: c: Q) Q) .~ a:! .9 ·s a:! U i1i B ~ 0) 0) ø
a:! ca 0) Q) 0) ~ Q) Q Q a:! 0 U L- e
- a.. - 0 Q ~ Q) =' ~ =' c: 0 Q) II) II) a..
c: "'0 U 0 E .~ oð 0)
¿ 0) Q) .J::. .2 c: E 'c .J::. .J::. 0 c: 0 0 ~ Cf) .¡: ã: II:: II:: 0) ~
c: t U 'c c: Q) c:
'E g U ..:.:: 0 ..:.:: Q) ;: E ;: Q) - - ~ !E "'0 I- .9 .¡:: .¡:: ã:
0 co L- =' :c - .c 0 ro ro L- II) co .¡: t Q) 0) > co ~
~ ~ .~ co Q) .S; 0) 0 =' co ~ .¡:: 0 0 > Q) Q) 0 0 =' 0 e! 0 co co Q II) 0 .J::. .l: ~ 0 ~
ã'.i Õ ë3 t5 û5 =' :E ~ ~ :i ëi5 :>
U a.. I- U CI ..., ::I: ::I: Cf) ::I: I- a::: ....J ::::> LL Cf) Cf) U.
=It
I-
0
W ..- N ('t) oq- It) co I'- co 0) 0 ..- N ('t) ~ It) co ...... co (J) 0 ..- N ('t) oq- It) co I'- co 0) 0 ..- N ('t) oq-
""') ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- ..- N N N N N N NN N N ('t) ('t) ('t) ('t) ('t)
0
a::
D..
en
t-
en
o
(.J
w
z
z
«
w
~
c
z
«
en
w
(.J
z
~
u.
w
z
«
(.J
-
0::
0::
::J
:r:
..,
..Jogg
:!LOOOO
ON..ooo
("')000
t-O~O_O
"-OLOLO
NN(",)(",)
~~~~
o
o
o
o
LO
N
~
00
000
00000
00000
00000
LO"-"-CÓO
NV("')N..-
~~~~~
t-
rn
o
o 0
W 00
Z 000
ZOOOO
~LOOOO
NO 0 -
ÑOog
"")«)oo("')..-
~~~~
o
~
00
00
000
000
000
0"-"-000
~~~~~
t-
rn
o
o
rn 0
WOOO
00000
ZOOOO
cC"-OOO
«VOOO
LLOÑOLO
N..-LON
~~~~
o
o
o
o
LO
N
~
00
00
go_~oo
00000
00000
LO O_~OO
NV("')N..-
~~~~~
Z
N 0
æ i=
ftí cC
Q. 0
o
..J
o
o
..- _IE'E
ñi !tI ::J ::J
æ æ 0 0
U~- UUU f/
oð...ê~~"C"C~-g
!tI !tI !tI 0 2 2 !tI '-
~ Q. U Q. .5 ~ ~ Q. ~
o "C "C "C E S( S( "C 'æ
a:::8°8Q)~~8u..
.~~j~~88~~
~ ~ f/ ~ ~ .5 .5 ~ I e.
Q) !tI !tI !tI 5 C C !tI .=
en....Jw....J>:::>:::>....J«
I~
::J
"C 0
!tIU
0"C
a::: Q)
~-
o ~
o ~
a:::t:
z 8
0.5
o C
0>:::>
o
o
o
Lt'i
("')
..-
~
o
o
o
Lt'i
v
~
o
o
o
o
0>
~
f/
Q)
C
ä:
~
:!2
Õ
:r:
o
o
o
Lt'i
«)
N
~
00
00
00
oLt'i
00 LO
..- N
~~
00
LOLO
00
00
00
..- ..-
~~
00
LO LO
00
riri
..- ..-
~~
00
00
00
1"0-- ,..:
00 00
~~
...,
000
OLOO
1"0-1"0-0
..-oLt'i
OON
LO..-v
~~~
o
o
N
N
1"0-
NOO
~~~
000
OLOO
LOI"o-O
moLt'i
NON
N..-V
~~~
"C
!tI
o
a:::
1;
:=
"C
~
0>
o
V
..-
. Q)
Q) >
~ :E 'C
Q)C
.!!! ::J ~
c: c: !tI
'e Q) :=
.- > !tI
>«Q)
N«)en
OOV
("')("')..-
"-"-V
"""Ii
o
000
000 000
00 - LOOO
OO~~gLO-("')1"o-
O>O>"-VLONOO("')
~~~~~~~~
o
000
000 0 0
00 - 0 0
o 0 ~ LO- LO
("')V"-OONO("')
~~~~~~~~
o
000 0
O.ggLOOOgO
o NOO 0
«)LOLOVLOLOOON
~~~~~~~~
«
..-
«....J
a::: en
CJ)Q.
Q)
z Q).~ ã)
OæCQ)Q) CQ)
N ....J ... .~ l:; Q) 0 ::J
o Q)"'CJ)::J¡ñC
..- '8 .~ C .t:: ~ C ~
.90a:::~~>Q)«
..-:=CroO«X!tI
CJ)f/!tIo..;-,,,W_
C .- gO..... .-
:::>Q)-g!tl~.g:Eæ
> Q)... .- Q) ::J
~~z~Æ~~~
O>OOO..-OQ)N
..-OOOV..-«>O
NN«)LO("')..- N
x
Q)
Q. :E _
E Q) !tI
o ê ~
U Q)~~ ...
f/ ....c: >...... 2
W Q) wo «!tI!tI C ...
« Q) .~ f!:! .. I Q. Q. "C Q) 2
~ > «m ~-g"C roU ~
t- ~ f/ ñi Q) C:'" "'!tIc o~ "
O C ... > en OO_!tI_!tI.o~ .....,
... 'æ 0......... .. Q) ~ Q. f/ ëñ Q) C ~
~ Q) Q)~ EQ) 2 Q) i !tIa:::oñi~ E::J ~-
a::: -> f!:! ~z -~-!tI-~--!tI f!:!~f/~~~::JE C
t- 'm ~ ~ ::J ~ ~ ..... ~ C ~ c: ~ c: ~ Q) 0'" .- 0 ~ ~ .t:: E ::J
rnwo Ü 0- a:::~!tI~!tI~!tI~"'Q)Q)!tIcE~~ eno E
;; E æ ...::J...::J ê .~ I >, Q) '* ã: '* ã: '* ã: 'E « ~ a::: Q. ~ Q) ~ ~ oð U ~ ~ OE
&~~t¡~¡~~g'~~~g~g~g8~~~8m~ðð 8~~~U
.!a - Q) E e E e 0 a::: I... E ... E ... E I .... C c: := "C '5 _ ... Q. Q) ... f/ C
~...- - -~ >I>Q)-Q)-Q)-b- !tIC::J -.t::- -.....c:O
o.o~~"'c"'c~~>I~_!tI_!tI_!tI=ÖQ»:=õ~~tE....JQ.t_~
0Q)0::J.90.90~~W"~f!:!~f!:!~f!:!"Q)f!:!!tI!tIc....J00!tlen~~0~
a:::cenuenuenut-en:r::::»t->t->t-:::>a:::t-CJ)....J~ CJ)za:::Q.u..:Eu>
:fit:
t-
O
WLO«)I"o-OO
"")("')("')("')("')
o
a:::
Q.
0>
("')
O"-N("') V
VVVVV
LO
V
«)
V
o
o
o
Lt'i
V
~
o
00
o LO
LO .
1"0-
1"0-0
LO ..-
~~
o
o
o
o
N
N
~
00
00
LO LO
Ñ"':
Nv
..- ..-
~~
"C
C
!tI
~
c:
o
f/
.5
.t::
o
-
::J
:r:
.t::
t
o
Z
"C
c:
!tI
~
C
o
f/
c:
:ë
o
-
::J
:r:
.t::
-
::J
o
CJ)
1"0-00
VV
(J) 0
vLO
"-N("')
LOLOLO
2~
.5 ro
~Q.
... Q)
::J .!a
O"C
-e ~
(I (I
:r:Q.
VLO«)I"o-OOO>0..-
LOLOLOLOLOLO«)«)
'-'
..""
en
~
en
o
o
w
z
z
«
w
.,
c
z
« M
en
W ~
o
z
~
u.
w
z
«
o
-
a:::
a:::
:J
:I:
.oJ ~ ,...
t! It) co 0 0 0 N 0 o It) 0
0 0 <q' C") CO 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 <q'. N C") 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N
~ 0 It) 0 It) CO CÖ c;j c;j It) It) 0 ari 0 0 O. 0 ari C) 0 0 c;j It) 0 0 0 0 C") ,...
,... ~ CÖ O. . It) c;j ri C) c;j 0 0
I.C) N C) ~ N I.C) ~ C") 0 0 ,... N N ~ It) I.C) C")
CO ~ ('f) ,... It) ,... <D N ,... N <D ~ ~ to N N C) ('f) ~ ~ N ~ ~ I.C) C") ~ <q' ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
t/
0
0
W ~
Z 0 CO 0 0
Z 0 C") CO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
c( C) ~ C") 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
ari 0 It) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 «i 0
w ('f) ~ ari . 0 0 c;j ari ari c;j 0 ari
., It) 0 ..- It)
0 0 0 ('f) C") <D N 0 It) ..- m 0 ..- 0 0 N N ~ CO ~ 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0
~ ~ ~ tß tß tß tß ~ tß tß tß ~ tß tß tß tß tß tß tß tß tß ~ tß tß tß tß ~
~
t/
0
0
t/
W 0 ,...
0 It) 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 It)
Z 0 <q' 0 0 0 0 0 CO 0 0 0 0 0 C) 0 0
~ 0 0 It) 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N
0 It) 0 0 . ari c;j 0 It) 0 <D 0 0 0 0 c;j oq: 0 0 It) 0 0 0 ,...
,... ~ 0 ~ ari 0 c;j c;j ,..: It) 0 Ñ m 0 ('f) 0
u. I.C) N <q' ~ m I.C) N 0 0 0 I.C) 0 ('f)
CO ~ ('f) <q' N ~ It) N N N <0 ~ ~ It) N N m ('f) 0 It) I.C) ~ 0 It) C") ~ <q' ~
~ tß tß tß tß tß tß tß tß tß tß ~ ~ tß tß tß ~ tß tß tß ~ ~ tß tß ~ ~ tß ~
.s
..J
10 ...
Q)
'tJ ..- 10 >
~V) ~ 1::
U 0
~::::> ;j ::s
0"0 Z ... ~ ~
Z .¡:: c ...Jc:( .~ U U
'tJ ..J CO CO
0 'tJ "0 10 o..~ ~ c Q) Q)
Q) > C
¡:: -C > ëë 0:: ... u...... ~ CD CD ~ ~
~ 'tJ .... ;j ;j c ro ro
c( > ï:: 1õ CO -C .... 2 ... Æ~ 10 10 'tJ 'tJ (/ (/
ëë 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 CO ~ :s' CO CO CO CO ~ ~
lIS 0 U
0 .... (/ 0 ~ 0:: CD ~{:. Q) ~ 05 c lOCO 0 0 "ª º "0 'E ~
c u 0:: 0:: ....
Q) Q) "0 U ~ Q) 1:.... .... ::J ::J CO CO U
.oJ "0 > C CO Q) Q) o 0 Q) C .s::;..... ~ ::S=l:l: ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 CO
C .¡:: .- .~ Q) ::!: LL. (/ ._ CO ..... U U .... .... 0 a CD CD Q)
.¡:: C ... )( .... ..... c: c:( C
co a Q) c.. .- CD ;j 10 ;j 0 0 co co CD "0
Q) ~ ~ c: Q) Q) a.... ~ ~ .Q c.. c.. ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 'ffi ~ ~ ::J = C f1!ã: 0:: 0:: u u Q) C
Õ U5 LL. CJ) E 5 "0 ::J 1:..J ... .... .¡:: .¡:: u u co
Q) ... o-m 1:: g ~ co co "0 ã)
~ z ~ - 0 ~ ß. z z Q) Q) Q) Q) :@
N ~ 0 0 0 It) o U OJ:) = Q) 0 z g "0 "0 CD CD >
N co .- 0 I.C) <D It) ~ ..- Q) :t: æ E ~ co C ~ ~ N Q) ~ ~
<D Q) II) ; N II) ~ m 0 .... 0 0 Q) .... ;j
N CJ) N I.C) ~ C") C") ~£ O::r: ..- 0.. ..- o¡¡::: <ë ~ ~ c.. c.. LL. LL. CJ) en CJ)
co
~ .- I/
« C ....
Q) Q)
<.,) E ~ .
w Q) "0 I-
0:: C C) <.,) ~ ~
a: a. ::J C E -
::::> Q) 0 § ~ g ....... Q) Q) Q)
E Q)
to- l!? a. Ig 'iU .- .... ....... iii iii I....... iii
co E 'S -~ 0 ~ It:!
0 0:: ;j ~ :s ~ Iz - C § C
::::> 0 E ~ CD "E 'S (/ CJ) ~ l!? .Q (/ .ª
a: - ~ u ~ .... e I/ ~ 0 I~ I~ Q) (/ ... ëñ !
co ::J ::J co CD S2 .Q Q) Q) (/ I/ I/
.... .... .~ co (/ C ~ I I
~ ~ 0 co ..... :s co - CD 0 .... ~ ~ ~ I~ ~
ë5 C C 0 C "0 co Q) ~
t/ .... CD c.. a. en J:) Q)
co t9 co I/ Q) 0 ~ C S2 ;j > § co I~ ~ 0
;:: .- u Q) co 1õ .... a::: to- co co I- co co co
c.. "0 CJ) "0 ~ 0:: 0 'S E E E E
co C I/ C (/ Q) > )( u U U u 'E 'E 'E E
Jg Q) co 'tJ C ::J I/ ë3 I/ .9 ~ .... co 0 en CJ) CD N co co co co co
a. E C 0 e Q) "C .- ::J Ü CJ) u C ~ :r: 0 0 co a co a co "0 0 a
'S: .~ +:; ~ Q) C ::J_ (/ ~ c: .9 1:: :æ: UJ w ::J ª I§
co ~ co :s ~ u ~ ::J C"u :t:: 0 co 0 I I 0'1 c.:i c.:i c.:i <.,) c.:i
.... u ~ co e (/ ::J .¡:: ~ ~ "C a. 0 ~ ~ .æ .~ .æ I/ .æ (/ I/ .~
co co 'ffi ~ 'ffi Q) o .... co "C ., ~ .... 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
::!: ëë a LL. l- LL. CD c.!) ::!:U5 ã: C a 0 <ë co m m ~ ::!: ~ ~ ::!:
-
~
0
W N C") <q' II) <D ,... co m 0 ~ N C") <q' II) <D ,... co 0> 0 ~ N C") ~ I.C) <D ,... co m
., <D <D <D <D <D <D <D <D ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... co co co co co co co 00 co
0
a:
~
.....
'-'
'wi
..J
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
~ C") 0 0 L6 0 «> 0 0 0 0 10 0 ci ci 0 ci 0 ci ci ci q ci a. 0 0
ex) 10 a. 0 0 oq-. 0 0 ci ci 0 10 10 10 10 0 10 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0
C") ,.... 10 C") N .... Ñ N .... .... ,.... .... C") N N Ii) N N .... N 10 C") C") 10 10
tI't tI't ~ tI't ~ ~ tI't tI't tI't tI't ~ ~ ~ tI't tI't tI't tI't tI't tI't tI't ~ tI't tI't tI't tI't
~
en
0
0
W
Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
< 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 a. 0 0 0 0 0 0
W 0 0 0 0 0 0 ci ci 0 ci ci ci q ci 0 0 0
0 0 0 ci ci 10
"") Ñ 10 10 10 0 0 10 0 10 0 0 0
0 0 0 10 0 0 N .... .... .... 0 C") N N 10 ~ 0 N 10 C") C") 10 10
tI't tI't tI't ~ ~ tI't tI't tI't tI't tI't tI't ~ tI't tI't tI't tI't ~ ~ tI't ~ tI't tI't tI't
~
tn
0
0 "0
en 2
w ro
0 0 E 0 0
Z 0 0 :o:J 0 0
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 II) 0 0
C") 0 0 ci 0 «> 0 0 0,) ci ci
u.. ex) 10 q 0 0 oq-. 0) 10 - 10 0
C") ,.... 10 C") N .... 0 0 0 0 «> .... 0 0 0 0 N 0 .... 0 0 0 0 0 0
tI't tI't tI't tI't tI't ~ tI't tI't tI't ~ tI't tI't tI't tI't tI't Z tI't tI't ~ tI't tI't tI't ~ tI't tI't
-
.... c
ro 0
0,) .:e
u ~ 0,) 0
::J ~ 0. "0
"0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 Z c "0 ro
ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro 0 N
..c: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 O....J ~ 0,) 0 0 ..c: 0
Z 0 cr: cr: cr: cr: cr: cr: cr: cr: cr: Q. II) ro c cr: .... 0 ....
0 ro ~ ~ - "0
"lit 0,) :t:: :t:: :t:: :t:: :t:: :t:: :t:: :t:: :t:: u.. ~ 0-e E ñi Õ c ñi
~ ::J ro
~ !II 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... - 0,) ro c c
I ..!. I I ..!. I ..!. ..!. I 0 0 Qj ~O,) ..c: ro :t:: Qj ro
III 0 .!!? - - - - - ..c: ::J 0 C > ~ t) ï:: ~ t)
I~ ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J -e .... .... ro "0
0 t) t) ü t) t) t) t) ü t) - ::J- C) Q)
0 ~ 10 o ::J oð ::E ....J ro oð
..J .... II) II) II) II) II) II) II) II) II) Z N o 0 oð oð 0 "0
0,) 0,) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) 0,) 0,) - - c Q) - cr: ~
!II « c I ~~ ! ~ ro ! ro
"0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 "0 ro « ~ ..c: 0 'S;
1.2: ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro ro .... - .... ro ro cr: Qj
a (5 (5 (5 (5 (5 (5 a (5 «Q. « ro :I: ~ 0,) c
.... Q. ë5 00 «
0,) £; ~ II)..Q II) c ~
..Q 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..c: ~ 'C ª ~ ro 0 ....
::J ~ -e II) C)O,) 'S; «
E N N N N N N N N N ~ cOO c > 0)
.... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... o 0 0 C ::J ro c ro Qj 10
~ «> «> «> «> «> «> «> «> «> enQ. z W ~oð ~ en ::E ~ en en oq- z
.... II) -
0,)
0 c C) >.
E 0 C) c oð .... -
0 cr: éi5 ::g ¡::- .g 0
0 c
cr: ~ 0,) I en C) ':; 0 "0 -
C) ñi ~ ~ CD CD !II 0,) -
w 0,) 0,) 'õ ro 0 - c
a:: II) 0 E II) 'õ 'õ 2 Q) c u.. ro 0,)
::J C ro 0 - 0 E E
::) 0 ~ u.. ro 0. ro ro II) II) II) 'w 0 0,)
~ 0 II) u.. u.. ~ ~ ~ - ~ .g
..c: C) II) 0
0 Q) ~ :ê 0 Õ C) C) ::J ~ "0 0,) ro 0,)
~ II)
::) (ij c .!!? c c - - Q. ::J CD
0 'iv 0,) II) :: """" N N 0 c
a:: 0 ::E ~ .... .- 0 'iv ::J 0 0 0 0,) 0 .8
~ II) 00 t) !II Q) ro 0 ro ro .... "0 0."0 Z cr: ::z:
tn ~ I I I I u.. C C?cr: !II :I: :I: û5 c ü - -
I ~ I I I ro c ~ ro II) t: 0 "0
ro 0,) Q) 0,) 0,) .$ 0 .$"0 0,) 2 .$ ~ NO,) o 0 - 0,) 0,) 'C
E - - - - - Q) ~ ..c: II) 0 !II
II) II) II) II) II) Q) II) 0,) II) II) II) oð E 1I)cr: >- ...c:
ro ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ro..c: ro ~ ~ ~ ~E '~íñ '3"0 ::J 0 .ê
~en ~ II) ....~ 0
0 t) ·c -e ....J 0,) ü~ t: -e -e -e -e :I: 00
"0= Q) II) ro 0,) ,.... ro - 0 0,) Q) 0,) 0,) Q) 0 ~
0 :Q :Q :Q :Q "O:I: ._ ro "0 .... :Q :Q "0 Q) "0 - > ......c: Q) c o:o:J > ~ ~ ~ > ro 'C 0,)
.!!? :.: ..- = 0 .£ - 0. ~ ~ II) c
ë5 ë5 ë5 'õ ë5 E ë5 ë5 .!!:! 0,) '3 cr: ~ '3 '3 - E
0,.... o 0 ::J .- 0,) ::J ::J ::J ro 'U
::E en en en en enN en en encr: 00 en CD 0 u..cr: ü en" enu.. ::E:O t) t) ü ü ü 0 c ::;
-=
~
0 0 .... N C") oq- 10 ~ ,.... ex) 0) 0.... N C") oq-
w 0 .... N C") oq- 10 «> ,.... ex) en
"") 0) 0) 0) 0) en 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .... .... .... .... ....
0 .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
a::
D-
en
.....
en
o
o
w
z
z
<C
w
""')
c
z
<C
en
W D-
o
Z
~
u.
W
z
<C
o
it:
0::
:)
J:
-
...,
"-'
..J ....
cr:: 0 '"
0 0 N
I- CD è
a 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 CO')
I- 0 0 0 0 0 ,.... 0 ~ ~ 0 0 o. LO ØI
0 0 C") LO ci ~. 0 ci ci Ó 0 0 N cD
LO LO LO ,.... or- or- N or- or- ,.... N ~ or- co
t#7 t#7 {fl {fl {fl {fl {fl t#7 t#7 t#7 t#7 {fl (fl ...
I-
rJ)
a
0 ....
w ....
z 0 ,...
z 0 0 0 .¿-
cr:: 0 0 0 N
a. 0 0 ri CO')
w 0 0 to:'
., 0 0 C") LO 0 CD
LO LO LO ,.... or- LO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~
t#7 {fl {fl {fl {fl {fl t#7 t#7 t#7 {fl t#7 {fl (fl ...
I-
rJ)
a
0
rJ) 0
w .
0 0 0 '"
z 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..¡
~ CD 0 0 0 0 0 0 o. 0
0> 0 ~ ~ 0 0 a. LO Cþ
u.. 0 0 ó ci 0 0 0 N øi'
0 0 0 0 0 0> N or- or- ,.... N ~ or- CO')
t#7 {fl {fl {fl {fl {fl {fl {fl {fl t#7 t#7 {fl (fl ...
Z
U') a
~ ~ 'U
gj c:
ro
"' 0 ~ ïñ
a
..J .~ >-
ro
.- c: 'U ~
Q) ï3) ro
~ ... 0
:> a:: Cf) ..J
.- « cr:: « « « « ::J
Cf) cr::
0 or- Cf) or- or- ~ or- or- ro
.J::. 0 « 0 « « « « « () I-
.- u a
LO C") a: en en en
N N Z Cf) Cf) en I-
oð
Cf)
a.
C> E
w 'U ro
t:t iÏi Cf) a::
.-
:J :g E 0- Cf) ...
l- E 0 ro
Q) ::J () ~ 0
0 c: C> C> :a ro .... cc
:J Q) ~ '0 19 a:: ã3 ~ ro
E Q) .... .J::. a.. >-
t:t .9 cc en .- c: en ro u ro Cf)
l- e: ro e: ::J a.. ro .J::. ~~
e Cf) Cf) ~ 0 0 >- en Q) u
rJ) f!! CD en 0 Cf) ro ~ CD ro Q) U
'> .... c: .... J: ~ CD U Q) Cf) 0
e: Q) -- ::J E Q) 0 0 >- CD ::JO
W c: 'õ 0 a.. Q) 0 en a:: "C ro E
~ c.. U ::J e: .... -e: e: c:
~ iÏi ~ ro CD ro e: ro ro () ::J
.... U
0 Q) .J::. e: E .9 E .É .J::. Q)
.- c: .¡: e: ...... Cf)
.D 0- C> ::J ro ::J .... .J::. .... ~ .... Õ ::J ::J
X 0 0 0 û5 0 ::J 0 Q) 0 ~~
0 a.. a:: en u J: . J: Z 0
:a:
I-
0 LO CD ,.... co 0'> 0 or- N C"') ~ LO CD ,....
W or- ~ or- or- or- N N N N N N N N
., or- or- or- or- or- or- ~ or- or- ~ or- or- 0r-
a
t:t
0..
en
t-
en
o
(,)
w
z
Z
<C
w
ï
C
z
<C
en
w 0..
(,)
Z
~
LL
W
Z
<C
(,)
æ
a:
::>
J:
Doug Anderson, County Administrator
Ray \Vazny, Assistant COlll1ty Administrator
Dennis M. Grim, Code Compliance Manager / Building Official@ \
\
'-'
TO:
FROM:
..,
Public Works
Code Compliance Division
l\1emorandum
\
SUBJECT: St Lucie County Damage Assessment to Housing Units
DATE:
October 7, 2004
St Lucie County Wide Damage Assessment
Units I Minor to Uninhabitable Single Mobile
i
inspected ~ moderate with major Family Homes
with damage I ~on-Structural structural inc1udes
I damage damage condo units
¡
Unincorporated St Lucie 2963 \ 2501 462 201 261
County -
City of Ft Pierce 2400* I 1500* 900 575 325
I
City of Port St Lucie )1,061 \ 10,000 1061 890 171·
St Lucie Village 250 ¡ 225 25 25 0
I
Total 16,674 \ 14226 2448 1691 757
* Estimated totals
The inspections that were made were immediately after the stonn, The number of uninhabitable units will
continue to grow due to lack of proper roof protection and if units are not removed of water saturated carpet and
furnishings, All inspections were made from the exterior of the building,
'...."
'-'
Available Funds for Hurricane Recovery
Emergency Reserves:
8,400,000
Line of Credits:
SunTrust
Bank of America
Harbor Federal
Total
20,000,000 '
30,000,000.
10,000,000 .
60,000,000 .
Total Available:
68,400,000 ,
....
...,
'-"
. . _0 .__ ~.. . _.. _ m_._"_ .-~-'.
BOARD OF
COUNTY
COMMISSION ER5
., T. ~eJel.E." ,~., '~..';"
,COUNT.·Y, ~"<,
" F . L 0 R" Po. D~ 'r A"·
,~~:~... ';,1;.': ,~~'".
f, -'"" . <fl..... .... '¡"p,",,' .
COUNTY
ADMINISTRATOR
_.~ ,-_._~_..,.,~_...__._.,-.
DOUGLAS M. ANDmSON
October 21,2004
Senator Ken Pruitt
1850 SW Fountainview Blvd., Suite 200
Port St. Lucie, FL., 34986
Dear Senator Pruitt:
The Board of County Commissioners, at their October 18th meeting, approved the
following legislative issues to be submitted to the County's Legislative Delegation.
These legislative issues are after action reports following Hurricanes Frances and
Jeanne (see attached backup material).
\
. All new Nursing Homes, Assisted Congregated Living Facilities and Dialysis
Centers should be required by the State to have adequately sized electric
generators installed before approval. These generators should have no less than
a 72-hour supply of fuel.
. The State should more strongly regulate the reintroduction of mobile homes to a
storm-damaged area, Under current law, mobile homes built over 20 years ago
can be moved into a storm-damaged area, Legislation should be enacted to
prevent moving any pre-1994 mobile home into any coastal storm-damaged
area. Also, construction of CBS homes should be permitted on the existing slabs
where mobile homes have been destroyed with any State requirements being
streamlined. The Board has authorized staff to advertise for a Public Hearing on
November 18, 2004 for the Planning and Zoning Commission to consider the
attached ordinance,
· A regional Special Needs/Emergency Operations Facility, as proposed to the
State, is required to efficiently manage a disaster. State funding is required to
assist construction of this center (see attached letter to Governor Jeb Bush and
Michael Brown, Undersecretary of Emergency Preparedness and Response.
· Dialysis Units _ Dialysis Facilities should be required as part of their disaster plan
to have a contract with a provider to deliver emergency water supplies as soon
as a hurricane warning is posted for the southeast coast of Florida.
· Adequately sized generators are needed immediately after a hurricane event to
power up local grocery store chains. These should be pre-staged in protected
areas.
JOHN D, Df1.UHN. Dlsrricr No 1 . ë:CL'~ ::"·Af1.D D,¡rric ',: :2 . P,,-ULA A. LEWIS Dlstrlcr No. J . mANNIE HUTCHINSON. Dlstrlcr No 4 . CLIFF DAf1.NES. DISHIer No 5
::>L~~. "-dmlnisrroror - Douglas 1.\, Ande>rson
2300 Virginia Avem;e . Fort Pierce FL 34982-5652 · Phone (772) 462-1450 · TOD (772) 462-1428
FAX (772) 462-1648 · email: douga@co.st-Iucie.fl.us
web sire: www.co.sr-lucie.fLus
...
~
...,
Page 2
October 21,2004
Legislative Issues
We ask that these issues be considered in future State Legislation.
Doug" ~derson
County Administrator
DMAlab 04-128
c: Board of County Commissioners
Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Faye Outlaw, Assistant County Administrator
Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney
Beth Ryder, Community Services Director
Jack Southard, Public Safety Director
Don West, Public Works Director
Dennis Grim, Code Compliance Manager
Mary Kay Cariseo, Executive Director, Florida Association of Counties
Ronald L. Book, P.A., Lobbyist
Jenny Lindell, Acting Director, SLC Health Department
Terry Lewis, Esquire; Lewis, Longman & Walker, P.A.
Attachments
\
~
...,
.----~
BOARD OF
COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY
ADMINISTRATOR
DOUGLAS M. ANDEr-SON
October 21, 2004
The Honorable Jeb Bush
Office of the Governor
The Capitol, Room 210
400 South Monroe Street
Tallahassee, FL. 32399-0001
Dear Governor Bush:
In 1999 it became clear to local officials that our special needs facility located
at the St. Lucie County Civic Center was inadequate, outdated and structurally
unsound. At the same time it became evident that the County's Emergency
Operations Center located on Rock Road was too small to house, feed and sleep
over 100 emergency workers, including 911 operators during an emergency
event. In turn, the County took the following steps to address these needs:
1. Special Needs Shelter/Civic Center - The County invested $57,400 to tie
the roof down to withstand a Category 2 hurricane in 1998. Then in
1999, the County invested an additional $60,700 to bring it to a Category
3 shelter. We realized that this action \-vas a temporary fix and that the
Civic Center would have to be replaced in the future as a special needs
shelter.
, 2, EmerGency Operations Center/Rock Road - As mentioned above, the
\ County needs a more modern and larger facility. The County decided the
most cost-efficient way to address these two needs was to build a joint
facility, The 40,000 square foot facility would house up to 500 special
needs people and the emergency operations center would have
dormitories, computer hookups, adequate showers etc" which would
house approximately 120 workers, excluding 911 operators who would
remain at Rock Road, The estimated cost for this joint facility is
$11,000,000 as determined by a study prepared in 2002 by Architects
Design Group.
3. Local StrateGU MitiGation List - These two facilities are included on the
County's Local Strategy Mitigation List,
JOHN D. DRUHN. Dis'-:- No, 1 . DOUG COWARD. DisrriCT No, 2 . PAULA A, LEWIS D S":' No J . FRA~;NIE HUTCHINSON. Dlmicr No 4 . CLIFF DAf\NES DIS'f;cr No.5
(auni.,. Adminlsrroror - :;:: _ ;-:;: ,'.\. Ande:,s::¡"I
2.300 Virginia Avenue · Forr Pierce, FL 34982-5652 · Phone (772) 462-1450 · TDD (772) 462-1428
FAX (772) 462-1648 · email: douga@co.sr-Iucie.fl.us
web sire: www.co.sr-Iucie.fl.us
~
'wi
Page 2
October 21, 2004
Special Needs ShelterjEOC Facilities
Since 2000 we have been requesting State-funding assistance for this facility,
which has been turned down every year,
We kne\v that the day would come when the Civic Center would no longer be a
viable option as a special needs facility, During the night of September 4th,
when Hurricane Frances struck, with 240 special needs people housed in the
Civic Center and 60 support staff, the roof peeled off. We had to move these
people three times within the building to protect them, The estimated cost to
replace the roof and air conditioning units exceeds $1,000,000, However, even
if we invested funds in this outdated facility, it will not meet our needs. We
have to have a special needs shelter that will house 500 people and a modern
emergency operations center for one of the fastest growing counties in Florida.
St. Lucie County and its residents need help, During Hurricane Jeanne \\'e
had to bus our special needs residents to A.G, Holly State Hospital in Palm
Beach County because we did not have a special needs shelter, The Civic
Center parking lot was used as a triage center, The County has suffered over
$76,000,000 in damage to its facilities from both hurricanes, We are
financially drained, We are requesting special attention to this urgent matter.
We are willing to meet with anyone at anytime to discuss this critical situation.
Please feel to contact me at 772-462-1450.
Thank YOU for your consideration,
. /J
/'
Sincerely,
')/
D gl~ M, Anderson
ounty Administrator
D}'[A/ab 04-129
c: Board of County Commissioners
Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Faye Outlaw, Assistant County Administrator
Dan McIntyre, County Attorney
Jack Southard, Public Safety Director
Beth Ryder, Community Services Director
Michael Brown, Undersecretary of Emergency Preparedness & Response
Ronald L. Book, P.A., Lobbyist
Legislative Delegation
Board of County com~~ners
Douglas M. Anderson, ~~nty Administrator
'-'
,~..._.~,¥._----
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
October 22, 2004
...",
ADMINISTRATION
MEMORANDUM
04-202
--'---'-
RE:
Hotel/Motel Status Report Update
This is an update to the October 8th status report identifying 53% of the County's total
motel rooms. October 8th had identified 50%. Once again, the rooms that are open are
operating at 100%. In October 2003, we were running at 51 % occupancy with all the
rooms being available (3,274).
At this time, Club Med is scheduled to come on line later this month, or the first part of
November, which will make available 337 rooms.
We will continue to provide you with updates to this report.
DMAlab 04-202
c: Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Faye Outlaw, Assistant County Administrator
Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney
'. Randy Stevenson, Interim Growth Management Director
Marie Gouin, Management and Budget Director
Larry Daum, Tourism and Economic Development Manager
Attachment
~
o
o
C'oI
-
.....
C'oI
-
o
.....
1::
o
C.
111
0::
III
::3
....
I'U
-
en
111
c
C
I'U
111
""')11)
1112
c t'O
~û5
'¡: ã5
10.-
::3 0
XI
CI
c:
'r:
QJ
VI c: 0-
L:. I,{') QJO
C 0 a.~ >
en !"o:QO "t:Jo~ ~
.r::. .=E·3N ~a,~
§ êü~U")~-£ -CO'~
VI c: E c: .a ~ ~o ~;¡; ~ := "C .~
VlQJ QJE :2QJc:;::....:ë
~ O-w o.QJ C:'<T.s CltU~ 5: ::>
._ 0 c 0 u 0 _ '- co c: Oa
~ ;::';;,;:: QJ g>.5! g> 0 UI g> ¡¡¡ g QJ QJ
CD g.!: g ~ :g ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ i '5 ~:5
.s .~ ; .~ .- 0 c...c 2 _ OJ .c ;> .2
c: _ o.-~;::~~.g tU g 5';'~ c:
::; .!! 0 ~ ._ 2!:- 0 co u.. =QJ rh tJJ c: GJ
ã:í 0 >- 0 f/) - to ~ .....J.-.... 0 a.
~:r::ë:I:~~.aêií2 ~g"C ~
.~ a. ~ ~ ~ OJ ~.~ ~ -;;
o U ""' Z .!: a. ãj ëii 0.
a. c: c:- _.a 0
3 I- ~.!!!::I:
""
~
:!2
'3
.a
~
>-
'"
E
t-S)
\
\.
'5
o
c: f!!
~ QJ ~
~ ~ ~
o m (I) '-
o "C s:. .9:!
~ .!: § ~
~ ~ ~ .s
EQJ ï~ ~ ;::
a,ClQJ (')QJQJQJiiiQJQJ ~
QJCI"'CI ClCICI",ClClQJc:
CltUEtU .s"'tUtUQJ"''''ClQJ
tUEtUE NEEE=EEtUo.
~~~~ "7~~~~~~~0
~ 0 ~ .~ & ~.~ ,Q...Q.. ~.º-..Q.. ~ E
o ëij'o tU '" (0 (0 tU (0 tU tU (0 g 0
.!: E ~ E E E E E E E E E·- 0
E,t/t,raro' I .ro. tE~
I -C I ""C""C""0""0 "C-c"'C"C-c I "C
C ~ c: OJ - '- OJ OJ GJ '- OJ QJ C m
8. ~ 8. ~ .~.~ ~ :g :g .~:g :g 8. 'ê
OUOU:2:2UÜü:2ÜÜO::¡
QJ
CI
(0
E
'"
o
.
.
\
ëii
~~o~OOOOOOOOO'<tOCj
UI
E
a::
UI
E
a::NOWI,{')COO~oo
;;;N;:C'1<.c"'=t't-NUJ......
õ
I-
~01'<tWC;;
..........- ,,(,C
r-Or-
I,{') 0(')
~C?~tõ
~~~È
a.'<tN'<t
'<tN~O
NN~O
oocor-O
,.u¡>q~
....L()LI)O)
COce01N
'<t'<tI,{')N
c.ol,{')
o'<t
oc.o
C?~
01~
Nc.o
N'<t
8~\f¡fB8
~1,{')'<t01N
WL()OCOO1
cnu1.¢,¿d1
COc.oc.oc.oN
'<t'<t'<t'<tN
'I::
g ãj
~ëijo ~
== _~::I: 'I:: g c:~
'E QJ ~ ¡:¡ 0 <: ~ c: U
~ ~ .~ ~ .~ ~ c: ~ ~ 13 ~ ~
:2 >-a.;¡; QJ ~.f: 13 ~g: - QJ
Qí-g.oÜ:::I:Ec:c:",_.!!!1D ,!!!m
-c: 0 "0 C a, <: c: 0Ul QJ ~ :->- c: c: tU .UI
;::æ "OC:- mo g.f:.!:(O
~ L:. >-.f:¡ñ (0 ¡;O~"O:2 c: UI-Z c:
~ ~'§ ~tj §;g,B :¡¡.~ g:u ~.!!!-£j
~ Æ<3,~:L3~~:fëñ~8~~>5
__N(,,)'CfU1tOt--fX)O)~::~~~
'-'
.r::.
o ë
QJ 0
"0 0 E "0
~ '- en t
~ ° £ ;::
~ ð 'õ - ~
tU¡¡¡ZC:"OC:C:.2c:tU
CI 0. c: 8. c: 8. 8..!!! QJ 0)
c: 0'- ° QJ 0 0- o.c:
ëii UI O)UI c: UI Ulëii °ëii
.a = .g = 8. = = E .!!! .c
g 15 ~ 15 ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ g
.!!!::I: ~::I: a::I:::I: ~::I:.!!!
QJ .a QJ QJ
§"O.c §
.r::. :5 "0 .r::.
a. ,g:5 a.
en ,g
en
.
UI
E
°
e
"0
QJ
0)
'"
E
(0 QJ
"0 0)
QJ .~ ~ E
C)Q) 'Era (1)"'
(OO)QJ.-E 0)0
EEtUO)~(O (0....
tU tU "0 E~
"OtUE~"" ~g
o~nJëg _>
"iuo-cm- 01
'- c:,-t::r.n-c-
~ ~ 'Ë e B ~ ~ 'Ë ~
c "'0' I 1 I ~ I ~
<:¡¡¡5:¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡:¡¡<:¡¡¡<:
° o..5!o.a.o.o.o a.o
ZOUOOOOZOZ
OL()O~NOOoL()O:2
to N..-..-N (") .-
c.oI,{')O~r-CO'<tooOCDr-
(")Wc.oN~NN(,,)'<t(,,)~
OO(')01~COOO1oo(,,)
1,{')0N~(')(')0r-oo(,,)
coo(')oooor-'<t'<t(,)
cor-N~r-(')(')~ooN
~~~~~tJ;~~~~
'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t
Q¡
0)
:m
~ ãi
c õ-
~ ::2~
:a ~.!~ãJ
c:~~o~;::õc:
"OEc:"O:2cnQJ:2.f: ê
~QjE~~;~:!:ã)~=
c:ClUlC:QJ-ac:tUUlQJQJ
ëã-g~8~me~§g-~
:2mOLUu.C)C)zenenl-
I/')r-C0010~N(,,)'<t1/')
..-...-__NNNNNN
...,
:;;
QJ
>-
QJ
I/') :5
~ Õ
~ > "0
c: 'c: c: c: 0 c: c:
QJ>QJQJQJZQJQJ
g-~g-g.g-¡¡¡g-~
.~ O).!!l .!!! .~ ~.~ ;;
:s·~¡¡~=i§
OQJooo;::0"O
::I:8"::I:::I:::I:ãj:I:~
õ 0
::I: ï3
QJ
.c
~
UI
;::
o
"0
c:
'j¡:
0)
c:
ëñ
UI
'Ë
UI
E
o
e
QJ
0)
'"
E ;::
~ ~ Q)
o ~ g>
c: tU E
'Ë E I/') tU
I~.fg~-: "C
.~ CtI ~ co > Qj
:ëE~Eo iií
5.~ ~~~ ~
(1)ooo~ .~
:5 .!: ëii' £ e E
BEEE£ ,
"'0 I I I "C "C
c: QJ c: c: c: QJ c: QJ
8.~ 8. 8. 8.~ 8.~
OUOOOUOU
o
g¡o~~goSio~
oot-NN00101/')¡:2
Ø)~f':!gf'~~~
OOOOWN'<t01
oOOOWCOON
c.o~01Nr-cor-m
r-L()I/')Nc.oCOI/')N
I I I . I I I I
COCOcot-c.ooO~
r-mr-(")c.oc.oc.or-
oo(")co(")'<t'<t'<too
UI
~
'3
en..... cn<: UI
oðenUl~C)~
.!!!E c:a.'I::'Sa.·3
u~ .f:c:gcnUlen
3 ~ ¡: c: .f: QJ >- 'c: ;::
ûj ~:2 % ¡;or: ~ ~ ~
't:iñD E;g~·5 Qj.§
~~¡}£~~~~~
c.or-C0010..-N(")
NNNN(,,)(")(')(")
c:
QJ
c..
c:Oc:c:C:C:C:
QJ >- QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ
0.= 0.0.0.0.0.
0(000000
UI 'E UI UI UI UI UI
.- '" .- .- .- .- .-
ãj 0. ãj QJ ãj ãj ãj
õ .~ õ 0 Õ 0 0
::I:ãj::I:::I:::I:::I:::I:
õ
:I:
UI
E
°
e
....
QJ
QJL:.
g»'õ
~~
"O~
c: 0
.S!' ""
UI ....
-g ~
"'''0
.... QJ
0'1::
° (0
~1iS
Eõ
° c:
UI QJ
"0 >
(0 '"
L:. L:.
UI
E
°
e
QJ "0
0) QJ
tU g
E QJ E
'" CI (0
"0(0"0
o E CI
.!: ~ .!:
E~ãj
c:- ~ -g
~ ~ t
QJ .... ~
E ,2. >-
o ctJ =
UI E :¡¡
fJ) "'0 t:
tU (0 ::>
.r::.L:.U
UI
E
o
~
"0
QJ
CI
'"
E
(0
"0
CI
.!:
ãj
"0
o
E
~
:?:-
ë
~
5
o
I I I I I I
c: c: c: c: c: c: c:
QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ QJ
o.c..o.o.o. 0. 0.
0000000
OONOOc.oW'<t
'<t(')t-~01WCO~
01#
(')(')
~I/')
Olf>NOOc.o0(")
(D~I'-~~tO~~
'<t
r-
N
(')
oce
OlD
~~
I,{')ID
WID
'<t'<t
1,{')0r-00
l,{')o(')COO
CO0010N
~~~~~
c.oWc.o01c.o
'<t'<t'<tl,{')'<t
¡:¡ c:
QJ .f:
c: a. 1;1
.f:lf>c:~ (0
~~~.f:C: <3
~~2§-=-c.o2~
._~--~ -j
a.UI(/)o.~ãjo.UI
E~>-E=-QJ(O
~u¿g£~~æ~
'<tlf>c.or-cocno
(')(")(")(")(")(')'<t
¡¡¡
õ
I-
.a
::>
en
~
..,
t/
2
'iñ
c.
t/ t/ E
» It!
a::a:: 0
-g-gu:(j
carD ,I....
,,!!!,,!!!<..::.8
~ ~ t/ ïii E
C C t/ > CU
~!.!2«~
......U,,!!!O
.E~O~r=
C1J Q,) IV - 0'-
:C~~:¡:2~
~~¡¡¡;~g-
~~~:G~~
~=~:æ~.E
=========m.-g
Cl)CI)CI)E-o-
IIIOev-5
~~~~~~
c.c..c.It!c.o
OOOJ:OCl)
\
ß~~:¡¡¡;;O
N~
OI/')If)OINCO
I/')N~~~IO
000
000
COMM
~d;d;
IONN
~NN
-
~
;:)
~t:
It! CU t/
a.> 1::
>"'-00
a:: C t/
t/.f: ð ~ ~
~:3>--;;;(¡
~ ~;g Ë ~
> It! 0 CU ;:)
Q:WJ:ZO
-NC")"'!it
~~~~
011/')
101/')
01 CO
0......
-i~
1010
~~
I/') NO"""
OINOIO
OINNIf)
~~~«¡'
MNCOU)
MN~~
~
>
It!
~ t/
... tv
CU C
C C
§ ~
a:: tv
-oCl)
tv CU
Or.
a::~
10......
~~
t/
~:G>-
.~.~ ~
CU c= CU
Cl)CUa::
&¡oCl)C
_ >- C
",~ru
CUtv:2 ~CUt/
a:: ~ _ a. 01 1::
E C_~..!!!~
...tvE!N::!E=CU
~:gu. ~ >0::;
Or.;:)UC...
5U:~ë>-:g~
r.=CUCUOOO
CI)<IDUJ:O~
CU
01
tv
E
tv
o
(¡
ïã
::!E
o
010
010
-......
coco
mcO
coco
~~
~
o
ë
CII
>
.=
E
o
E!
01
C
~
o
3::
ë
~
5
o
t/
CII
..c
'C
o
t/
CII
o
TRADITION STADIUM
$5,182,381
441 ~833
$4,740,548
397,490
22,172
22~172
$5,182,382
'-'
Contract
2% Deductible
Insurance reimbursement
FEMA (90% reimbursement)
State (5% reimbursement)
SLC (5% exposure)*
....,
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
Agenda
Friday, August 20, 2004
7:30 a,m" Conference Room # 3
St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex
1. Convene meeting
1,1 Roll Call, announcements
1.2 Minutes
2, Old Business
2,1 Update on CBC Sheriff / Jail recommendations (Exhibit A)
2,2 Update Fiscal Year 2004-2005 Approved Budget (Exhibit B)
Millage Rate Decrease
3, New Business
3,1
4, Adjournment
4.1
'w
"wi
Draft
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: June 18, 2004
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Kenny Hogan, Mark Taynton, William "Bill"Casey, John Knapp, Debbie Hawley,
Edward Lounds, Sylvie Kramer, Steven Messer, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick, Carl
Hensley, Linda Bartz.
MEMBERS ABSENT: David F. Samuel, Ron Parrish, Paul Young.
OTHERS PRESENT: Roger Shinn, Ethel Rowland, Jennifer Hill, Doug Anderson and Marie Gouin.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
Doug stated that in regards to the discussions about the jail overcrowding, it is necessalY to hold a meeting
prior to the next regularly scheduled CBC meeting, due to the urgency to resolve this matter and requested
that if possible, they meet on July 2,2004.
MEETING MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the May 21,2004 meeting, Kenny moved for approval
and John Knapp seconded the motion. An members present voted in favor and the motion passed.
Additional Homestead exemption
Doug explained the effect the "Proposed Constitutional Initiative Petition to Increase the Homestead
Exemption by $25,000" would have on the County's Tax Roll. Should this additional $25,000 homestead
exemption be approved, an estimated of 3,184 properties would come off this County's Tax Roll. This
would affect the General, Fine & Forfeiture and Mosquito Control Funds and for the revenues to stay at the
level they are today, the millage rate would have to increase somewhere between 1.09 and 1.13, shifting the
property taxes to evelyone else in the community (including business).
He stated this represents a problem, not just for our County, but it may disrupt the whole State of Florida
(i.e. as far as he recalls, there are seven Counties in the State of Florida that are at their 10 mil cap and
would have to consolidate with other Counties, in order to cover the costs of public selvices).
Staff has prepared a draft (to be presented at the next BOCC meeting) resolution opposing the "Proposed
Constitutional Initiative Petition to Increase the Homestead Exemption by $25,000" and will recommend to
adopt this resolution (04-174), He requested CBC members' to support this recommendation.
Bill Casey asked what impact would the exemption have on the budget. Staff replied it would reduce future
Fiscal Year's revenues by approximately 11 MM/year and to compensate the loss, OUI" County will also have
to increase the millage rate velY close to the 10 mil cap.
Ed asked if there are any plans to start an information campaign to make the general public aware of the
impact the second homestead exemption would have on the quality of public selvice.
Doug stated the Florida Association of counties will meet next week and are planing to launch a state-wide
campaign on this matter and he personally has been speaking before several local groups. He is of the
opinion that if the public is informed of the advantages and disadvantages, the majority will see there are
more disadvantages to approve the exemption.
Linette Trabulsy, the County's Pu blic Information Officer added that the feed back she has been getting from
the press is that they agree approval of the exemption would cause big problems to the whole State of
Florida and they have been writing stories and editorials to that effect.
\.;
....,
Committee members and staff discussed the impact of the exemption. Some members are of the opinion
that an educational campaign, although it's a worthy cause, will not change the minds of property owners
that expect to benefit with the exemption. Some members proposed to consider launching the educational
campaign and not state a position pro or con, since it may appear to the general public it is a bias position
from the County government as an "interested party" that only wants to collect more taxes and ·spend it in
more bureaucracy". Other members disagreed and stated that as the Citizen's Budget Committee, and
having full knowledge that such a cut represents a blow to the County's budget that will harm the
community as a whole, they should state their position and clearly oppose it. Other members stated they
were not certain they opposed the exemption if it means it would shift the burden of taxes from the lower
income population to the commercial and industrial sectors.
Doug stated such a way of thinking hurts the County's capacity to attract businesses to settle here, as
Florida would be having one of the highest property tax rates in the CountJy, making this County less
competitive.
After lengthy discussion on this matter, Carl moved to support the resolution opposing the exemption. John
K. seconded the motion.
Some members opposed supporting the motion if it did not include to also vote to launch a campaign to
educate the public about the consequences appl'Oval of the additional exemption would have in the
community, in terms of the quality of public selvices and the impact on the economic development of this
area.
Carl stated he agloees it's necessalY and modified his motion to the following: move to recommend to the
DaCC to issue Resolution 04-174, opposin¡ the "Proposed Constitutional Initiative Petition to
Increase the Homestead Exemption by $25,000" and launch an information campaign to make the
public aware of the consequences approval of the additional exemption would have in their
communities. John K. seconded the motion. Motion passed (10-2, Mark and Pat voted no).
Fiscal Year 2004-2005 Bud2et Hi2hli2hts
Doug briefly explained a memo handed to CBC members dated June 15,2004, which lists projects that will
have a significant financial impact to the 2004-2005 Budget (Please refer to memo # 04-110 from County
AdministJ'ator for details). Staff and CBC members discussed briefly each item described in the memo.
Jail Overcrowdin2 and other issues re2ardin2 the Shedlrs Bud2et
Doug gave a brief backgl'Ound of the actions taken regarding this mater. In regards to the jail pods, the first
pod is expected to be on line by the I'" of may 2005, the second, appl'Oximately a month later. He also
mentioned that in regards to the correctional officers that will be needed to run these pods, the BOCC
approved during the Budget Workshops, last July, to set a contingency fund ($500,000) that would allow
to hire them whenever necessalY.
Doug informed committee members about the BOCC authorization to send inmates to Highlands County
temporarily, until the more long term solutions to the overcrowding are set in place. There is a cap of
$100,000 set to be spent on this temporalY solution.
Doug also related to committee members about staffs trip toAlachua County (Gainesville) and the ideas they
got for working on solutions for jail overcrowding. He stated he is optimistic about some of the ideas they
have come up with at Alachua County for processing cases faster to keep the system moving; he believes
they may work for this County. Meanwhile, the St. Lucie County BOCC has authorized staff to go out for
Request for Proposals to do a study of this County's criminal justice system (estimated cost of the analysis
is $100,000).
Doug stated that the reason why he is requesting the CBC members to have an extraordinalY meeting on
July 2, 2004 is because the BOCC requested for the CBC members to make recommendations on several
of the issues regarding the Jail overcrowding (to be discussed by the BOCC at their regular meeting
Citizen Budget Conunittee Meeting
June 16,2004
page 2
~
....,;
scheduled for July 13,2004) .
The matters to be discussed are temporalY solutions to the overcrowding, such as what would it cost to put
up a low-tech dormitOlY type building where tent city was for low risk offenders. By doing this, an existing
dormit01Y at the jail would free up to accommodated more serious offenders, but it would need to be
remodeled for this purpose (convert it into a maximum security facility). County and Sheriffs staffs have
been instructed to bring to the BOCC estimates for a (fairly reasonable) cost to do this, as well as an estimate
of how much the operating costs of the jail would increase to, once these solutions are put in place.
Doug stated that another issue to be discussed, is that the Sheriff has asked for $527,477.98 to cover the
cost to hire, train and equip additional personnel at thejaiJ. He stated that it is also necessa1Y to analyze
if there will be any other budget shortfalls, due to this situation.
Toby Long, Finance Director for the Sheriffs Office handed out information comparing Alachua County to
St. Lucie County to illustrate the inmate to staff ratio (8.06 inmates/ldeputy) at the St. Lucie County Jail,
which has reached to a level that jeopardizes its secu1'Ìty.
Staff, Committee members and other attendants continued to comment on the aspects of the overcrowding
of the jail, such as the fact that many are there awaiting trial for m01'e than 6 months (se1'Ìous offenses take
longer to be processed due to their complexity) and spoke about the high volume of cases assigned to each
judge.
Doug briefly explained some of the ideas they have come up with at Alachua County to speed up the
processing of cases in their judicial system. He also mentioned that at Alachua the have implemented the
GPS system to monitor people who are awaiting trial and are under house arrest (some of the accused pay
of their sala1Y for this privilege - $7/ day, opposed to costing -$50/ day to the county jail).
NEXT MEETING
Bill proposed to call the roll to verify how many members could attend the July 2,2004 extraordinary CBC
meeting to discuss the Jail issues (At 7:30 a.m.). Members present (except Debbie, Sylvie and Steven)
stated they can attend, therefore we expect to have a quorum.
The next regular CBC meeting wiD be held on Friday, July 16, 2004 at 7:30 a.m.(topics to be
announced).
Both meetings will be held in Conference Room # 3 of the St. Lucie County Rogel' Poitras Administration
Annex.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 9:05 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secreta1Y
William "Bill" Casey, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
June 16, 2004
H:\O Secretary\!! OMBICBCIMinl06 18W!'d
page 3
'-'
..,;
Draft
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Extraordinary Meeting
Meeting Date: July 2,2004
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Kenny Hogan, Ron Parrish, Mark Taynton, William "Bill"Casey, John Knapp,
Edward Lounds, Patricia "Pat- Ferrick, Troy Ingersoll, Carl Hensley, Linda Bartz.
MEMBERS ABSENT: David F. Samuel, Paul Young, Debbie Hawley, Sylvie Kramer, Steven Messer.
OTHERS PRESENT: Major Patrick Tighe, Toby Long, Kathlyn Hensley, Jennifer Hill, Doug Anderson
and Marie Gouin.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
Doug went over the agenda and the additions handed out at the meeting and summarized the issues to be
discussed.
MINUTES
The minutes for the June 16,2004 meeting will be presented to the CBC members for approval at the next
regular meeting.
Jail costs and overruns
Doug made a recap of the events regarding this matter and stated the Sheriff had come before the BOCC
a couple of months back and reported on the situation regarding the SLC Jail overcrowding and since then
he had been asked to present different alternatives to solve the problem.
The Sheriffs staff researched different alternatives and has come back with solutions that could be taken
until the jail pods that have been approved for construction are running. These solutions include a low-tech
facility to be erected (permanently) where the former "tent city- was, moving low risk inmates (trustees) into
those and retrofitting an old dorm into a medium security facility. Also, to temporarily transfer some low
risk inmates to another county (Highlands) and to implement a monitoring (GPS) system for individuals
awaiting trial that would be eligible for house arrest (leaving their home only to go to work).
Doug stated that, to date, the Board of County Commissioners has approved $25.5MM to construct two new
jail pods; has also authorised to cany out an assessment of this county's criminal justice system (estimated
cost $99,480) and to transfer (temporarily) some inmates to Highlands County at a cost that must not go
over $100,000. He also mentioned staff is making inquiries about the GPS system(expected to be much
more cost effective).
Ca ital Cost to Construct a Low-Tech Housin Facilit at the Previous Tent Cit Site To ether with
the Capital Cost to Convert the Existinl!: Jail Dorm into a Medium-Security Facility. Annual
Operatinl!: Costs to Run and Maintain These Two Facilities.
Roger Shinn, Central Services Director, handed out a brief with infOlomation his staff had gathered regarding
the options available to construct a low-tech, low-cost housing facility. He explained briefly the pros and
cons of each of the alternatives presented (for details, please refer to handout). Staffs recommendation is
option # 1 (metal building, at a cost of $216,300 each - including air conditioning), two buildings that would
allow housing 50 inmates each. He also pointed out these costs do not include permitting, restroom and
shower facilities and air conditioning.
CBC members and staff discussed and compared pros and cons for evelY option and inquired if air
conditioning is a requirement. Major Tighe stated that one of the Florida requirements is to maintain a
normal comfort range of temperature.
-...,
'fw¡
They also discussed some details of the cost to retrofit Dorm A-I into a medium-security facility and if two
story buildings are feasible for the low-tech buildings (the Sheriffs office had presented a two stOlY building
alternative to the BOCC some months back, but they instructed staff to research for low-cost, low tech
alternatives) and even the possibility of one big building that would accommodate 100 inmates instead of
2 that would accommodate 50 each (not feasible, because of the shape of the area available).
Doug pointed out that if this project is approved and regardless of the option selected, another aspect that
will need to be analyzed and discussed is the annual operating costs of the 2 low-tech buildings and the
retrofitted dorm.
In regards to this matter, Major Tighe referred to memo from County Administration 04-134 addressed to
the BOCC and the CBC listing the annual costs for the low-tech housing facilities (for details please refer
to agenda addition item #2, handed out at the meeting). Doug noted these costs do not include utilities
costs.
Those present also discussed the percentages of the different levels of security and the guidelines to classify
them as low, medium, maximum security. Major Tighe stated the majority of inmates are medium to
maximum, who can't get out due to their violent past, violent current charges, failing to appear in court, etc.
They also discussed the possibility of hosing federal inmates, considering the revenues coming from this
would help with the operating costs. Toby Long stated that they could provide projections, but they have
to keep in mind that the only projections and he recalled that, for example, when they prepared the
projections for this year, there was no way they could have predicted that the population would be up 23%
since JanualY.
Bill inquired ifit was possible to prepare a low, medium and high scenario to have some kind of idea of what
to expect. Doug added that he understands that projections are just that, but if there is some information
ahead of time, it would allow staff to begin looking for ways to resolve the problem.
Major Tighe went over the comparison between the Alachua and St. Lucie County jails and crime statistics
on how SLC Jail compares to Alachua and the rest of Florida, rating among top 10 in all the ones discussed
(please refer to his hand out for details) and stated that bottom line, SLC is processing more cases, (and
faster) than Alachua and still can't keep up with the increase in jail population (currently, jail population
is increasing at an average of 32.8 inmate evelY month).
Members also discussed the advantages of implementing the GPS (monitoring) System and how much it
would alleviate the overcrowding, convictions and the fact that anyone sentenced for 365 days or more go
to State Prison, as well as some aspects of the Federal Inmate Program.
Ed inquired what are the specific questions that need to be resolved at this meeting.
Doug stated that besides the capital costs discussed up to this point, staff needs to know what is the
projected operational cost of the jail in the next 5 years; what is the cost over and above the current
operating costs, when the new facilities come in line and how they will be funded.
After some more discussion, members agreed for the time being, to decide on the low-tech options and direct
County and Sheriffs staffs to work on determining the operating costs based on that decision.
Mark moved to go forward with option 1 for the low-tech buildings. Troy seconded the motion.
Ed stated it is necessalY to ad to the motion to direct staff to work with the Sheriff's office in determining
the operations costs of the option.
Doug inquired if there is any possibility to use the deputies that were recently hired to run those two
buildings until the two new jail pods are in place.
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
July 2, 2004
page 2
,-,.
...,
Toby stated he believe it can be done.
Mark modified his motions to the following: move to go forward with 2 buildings, option 1 (with air
conditioning and insolation), and to direct staff to work with the Sherin's office in determining the
annual operations costs of this option. Troy seconded. Members present voted yes 9-1 (John K.
Voted no) and motion passed.
Mark Taynton moved to recommend to the BOCC to direct staff to move as expeditiously as possible
to BID for a monitoring system that would allow to put inmates under house arrest. Ron Parrish
seconded the motion. AU members present voted in favor and motion passed.
Sherin's $527,477.98 Fundin2: Request to Cover the Jail overcrowdin2: costs
Toby Long stated this issue was discussed at last year's budget workshop and referred to memo he handed
out to CBC members, detailing the costs the jail's overcrowding has generated in recent months. He also
explained briefly some the details of handling security at the jail. The costs detailed in the memo are from
October 1,2003 to date, and then projected to September 30,2004.
After discussing this matter those present agreed this should be declared and emergency and the costs
overruns should be reimbursed through the Sheriff Reserve Fund, Law Enforcement Impact Fees and the
County's Emergency Reserve.
CBC members also inquired how will these monies will be transferred to the Sheriff and will he return the
excess.
Toby suggested this could be monitored on a monthly basis and disbursed as needed.
Ed moved to recommend reimbursing the Sheriffs Office an amount not to exceed $1,492,500 for the
2003/2004 budget year from the following funds: $500,000 - SheriffSalalY reselve fund, $510,000 - Law
Enforcement Impact Fees (to be collected July-Sept. 2004) and $482,500 designated from the $8,400,000
Emergency County Reserves and that it should be partially reimbursed through penalties assessed against
the jail security system cont.ractor. The Sheriffs Office will request reimbursement as needed and may not
need the full amount of $482,500. The emergency reserves could be replenished over 3 months, JanualY
thru March 2005 through Law Enforcement Impact Fees.
FY 2003-2004 Security Cost - $484,154 for Providin2: In-house Security for Security System UPErade
Workers
Doug s stated this is an ongoing problem and that going into litigation with the contractor. Sheriff will
provide documentation on this matter.
Due to time const.raints the meeting had to be adjourned.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC regular meeting will be held on Friday, July 16,2004 at 7:30 a.m., in Conference Room # 3
of the St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex. Topics to be discussed will include an update
of the BOCC's actions on the jail overcrowding and the Sheriffs costs overrun.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 9:15 a.m,
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, SecretalY
William "Bill" Casey, Chairman
Citizen Budget ConmliUee Meeting
July 2, 2004
H:\O SecretarylO OMBICBCIMin\07 02wpd
page 3
'-"
...."
EXHIBIT A
Law Enforcement Low-Tech Inmate Housing
I Action I
Subject (Aaenda Item#sR1. 7/22/04): Construction of low-tech inmate housing for 100 low-risk inmates,
minimum security inmates and retrofit Donn A-1 to house medium security inmates.
Citizens' Budaet Committee Recommendation: The Citizens' Budget Development Committee
recommended (9-1) that the Board of County Commissioners (BOCC) proceed with the construction of 2
low-tech air-conditioned steel structures and the retrofitting Donn A-1 at a cost not to exceed $560,000.
The Committee further recommended that the Board declare an emergency and authorize staff to
negotiate and enter into a contract not to exceed $560,000 to construct these facilities. This excludes
$51,000 in furniture and fixtures.
Fundina:
Correctional Impact Fees #310003-2330-562000-200
Other Public Facility Impact Fees #310003-1930-562000-100
$450,000
$161.000
$611,000
7'
tfV
.., "
\
BOCC Action (Aaenda Item#sR-1. 7/22/04): Approved (5-0) motion to direct staff to immediately
research tents to fit on existing slabs and bring back cost estimates for the tents. It was also requested
that cost be brought back for retrofit.
! Action II
Subject (Aaenda Item#RA1. 7/27/04) Staff Reauest: The purchase of Tents and necessary items for
minimum-security inmates at Rock Road Correctional Facility and retro-fit Donn A-1 to medium security
($74,360 Construction and $36,238 Furniture/Equipment).
FundinQ:
Impact Fees-Public Building #310003-1930-562000-100
BOCC Action (7/27/04): Approved (5-0) staff request of a bid waiver and emergency purchase of tents
and necessary items to establish this arrangement at the Rock Road Correctional Facility at a cost not to
exceed $111,000 including furniture and fixtures.
---
I Action III
Subject (Staff Request): Request to proceed with the GPS/Electronic Monitoring System.
Citizens' BudQet Committee Recommendation (7/2/04): Mark Taynton moved to recommend the
BOCC direct staff to move as expeditiously as possible to BID for a monitoring system that would allow
putting inmates under house arrest. Ron Parrish seconded the motion. All members present voted in
favor and motion passed.
BOCC Action: Directed staff to go out for Request for Proposals (RFP's).
~
...,
Law Enforcement Cost Overruns/Shortfalls
I Action I
Subíect (AQenda Item#SR2. 7/22/04): Sheriff's request for reimbursement of cost overruns/projected
shortfall in 2003/2004.
Citizens' BudQet Committee (CeC) Recommendation (7/2/04): The Citizens' Budget Development
Committee recommended reimbursing the Sheriffs Office an amount not to exceed $1,492,500 for the
2003/2004 budget year.
Reimburse the Sheriffs Office Budget $1,492,500 for 2003/04 cost overruns/projected shortfall from the
following funds:
$500,000 - Sheriff Salary reserve fund
$510,000 - Law Enforcement Impact Fees - to be collected July-Sept. 2004
$482.500 - Designated from the $8,400,000 - Emergency County Reserves
$1,492,500
Note: The $482,500, which includes cost projections for July thru September 2004, should be partially
reimbursed through penalties assessed against the jail security system contractor. The Sheriff's Office
will request reimbursement as needed and may not need the full amount of $482,500. The emergency
reserves could be replenished over 3 months, January thru March 2005 through Law Enforcement Impact
Fees.
FundinQ:
General Fund-Emergency Reserve #001-9910-599300-800 ($307,477)
General Fund #001-2300-599043-200 ($500,000)
Correction Impact Fees ($685,023)
BOCC Action (7/22/04): Approved (5-0) motion to approve $1,185,000 with $500,000 coming from the
$500,000 reserve set aside this year and $685,000 from correction impact fees.
I Action II
Subject (AQenda Item#CA1. 7/27/04) Sheriff's Request: The Sheriff requested $307,000 be taken
from the 2004-2005 Budget Request to make up the difference between $1,185,000 and $1,492,000.
FundinQ:
General Fund-Transfer to other Funds #001-8110-591000-800
BOCC Action (7/27/04): Approved (5-0) to cover shortfall overruns in the 2003/2004 Budget in the
amount of $307,000 to be taken from the $18,600,000 in the recommended 2004/2005 Budget and be
added to the $1,185,000 that was approved for cost overruns. The $307,000 will come from the
2003/2004 cash carried forward and subsequently, the $18,600,000 will be reduced by the $307,000
leaving a balance of $18,293,000 in the 2004/2005 Budget.
~
..",¡
..
OMB
AGENDA R.EOU~~ J.
ITEl\1 NO. CAl
DATE: July 27,2004
REGULAR
.. PUBLIC HEARING
CONSENT
[X]
TO: ST. L DCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
\
SUBMITTED BY: OMB
PRESENTED BY: Marie M. Gouin
SUBJECT: Sheriffs Office 2003-2004 Cost overruns/shortfalls,
BACKGROUND: At the July 22nd Special Board meeting, the Board approved $1,185,000; $685,000
from Correction Impact Fees, and $500,000 from the budgeted Sheriff salary reserve, which is $307,000
less than the original request. The Sheriff is requesting $307,000 to be taken from the 2004-2005 Budget
to make up the difference. Staff recommends using part the budgeted $900,000 to be transferred from the
General Fund for the Clerk of Circuit Court's building and transfer the $307,000 back to the project next
year from the 2004-2005 Sheriffs Budget.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: 001-8110-591000-800 Ç;n¿ra / r:,""I- 7"",6;;'- Iv ðJ¡,er F,;,Js
PREVIOUS ACTION: On July 22, 2004 the Board of County Commissioners approved $1,185,000 for
cost overruns.
RECOMì\IENDA TION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve allocating the
Sheriffs Office the additional $307,000 of cost overruns/projected shortfall in 2003-2004, and reducing
his budget for fiscal 2004-2005 by the same amount,
COMMISSION ACTION:
[~APPROVED [] DENIED
[ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0
RRENCE:
-
Item pulled for sep3r3te vote
requested b) Comm, Hutchinson,
Douglas M. Anderson
County Administrator
Coord inationlS i gnatures
County Anomey:xx ~ IU .., Management & Budget: ~ Purchasing:
Originating Dept: Public Works: Other:
Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) --1-,
\w
...,
~-~~- ~::_::=.~:.~~= :.:~~:~~~,.~. ~~~~~'~~::'1
ITEM NO. éJ
DATE: ï -13-04
~-' - ~J '-fJ- "\
f _ --.,.......o.t~;.,.
- .. - '.., _I.-."'j¡.
. To! "'_'~'""?"'~';"'/'''~
r~!Ü" - '\.i"foO' " ",'-,,'" ;,,:," \' , ,
:1 r':G: . t ,.., ~ï""" ,.
: .~ C ~]f. ...~..':" '.' '. !
.\.;;.. ".~:~ .'.~ ':...:~,"'..........,~¡":.1""I:._.". ".-
i !;.:: i~,_~;J~'dt,',~'~~:~~!:;?;:,;:1
AGENDA REQUEST
~.::~: ~ '.~=~'''~~;~~' ~~.~.-,:.:.:_:-~~':~:.~¡:.~;)
REGULAR: (x)
PUBLIC HEARING: ( )
CONSENT: ( )
TO:
BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRES6 'JT¿ BY:
I/, I---
.'........ "
Do 9lus)1I: ~nderson
County/Admin ¡strator
Sheriff's request for reimbursement of cost o\'erruns/prOjected'~alf in 2003/2004 budget.
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT):. ADMINISTRATION
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
See attached July 2, 2004 memorandum, it~m #3 and the attached July 6, 2004
memorandum,
=UNDS AVAILABLE: Acct fJ001-991 0-599300-800 - General Fund-Emergency Reserve Loan ($307,477)
Acct #001-2300-599043-200 - General Fund ($500,000)
$1,49?-,500 Law Enforcement Impact Fees (S6S5,023)
TOTAL
'REVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
~ECOMMENDATION:
The Citizens' Budget Development Committee recommends reimbursing the
Sheriff's Office an amount not to exceed $1,492,500 for the 2003/2004 budget
year,
;OMMISSION ACTION:
CONCURRENCE:
J APPROVED
J OTHER:
o DENIED
Douglas Anderson
County Administrator
Review and Approvals
County Attorney:
º Management and 8'J:13et:
º Purchasing:
Originating Dept:
º Other:
º Other:
Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable:
'yone ¡·.lIh a dlsabi/¡fy reqUiring accommodations to al:lend this mee:ing s!;::~ ': ::: -:=::: :,~i! s: L~::e Co::n.'ï Communt:y Se.-,·:es Mal1ager a: ï7'::~=2.1777
TTO 772·452·1428. at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting.
" ','::N J '''.'');:(O'AG::'ND~w,SHERrFF su:> REII,1S 7·'3,04 c::-<:
'-'
...."
, .
(.~- ':_~~-~~~~-_-:'--'..==.=.:~~'~~. '~~,',; ~~::-L'j
COUNTY J\DMINiSTRATION
~-dJ- I f -lli-- "~
" _.....~.~
.-- - ... ..' .....-
r~~' ',,,, .-17".!'":-::-, .~,.~~.~·;,:~",·\,I
t¡' cr 0 'f(\ l~ ~ ~~/"',;.':;;;.':\" !
~ '-:--.;~~.. ,.~....};,-,.::::....,;.....,..;_., ~ J
,,_.;: ·d'D·f.'¡,_f"·:la' ..J....:;.;..:..-.-
:_L~.:.~,~~..~.:'"';.,::.:..t..~~..~~,- :':.":L~.:1 ~~(.~ J
MEMORANDUM
04,144
'" :~·_;";.~Z.:.': ~..~::": ~:~.~~=::...:~.i~~::: ;~¿~~:,J
C'Z'.:"2Z.,~ r, '.' ~j,.~.:_~:-:.~~>rz.::L::;;'~p~, ,,,...:"-::"t:;'::'::T.::::.-;.-:.r=;::,:=-.-:::.-;=~:::..::..~o:r·":"~n""" :;;7"......:.=-<'~. ... "'-'- T.:..>:lJ
TO: Board of County Commi Si~
FROM: Douglas M. Anderson. unty Administrator
DATE: July 7,2004
RE:
Reimbursement of Sheriff's 2003/2004 Budget in an Amount Not to Exceed
51,492,500
-
_....--,,_ _.___...._._...-"'Y.-................- ..---._~......,-_..-
The Sheriff has identified $1,492,500 in cost overruns and projected shortfalls for the 2003/2004
. fiscal year. See attached breakdown. The Citizens' Budget Development Committee recommends
reimbursement using the following funding sources:
$50J,000
Sheriff salary reserve funds established by the Board of County
Commissioners
$500,000
Loan from County's emergency reserve funds (58,400,000) to be repaid
from:
1. $192,523 - Jan-Mar 2005 Law Enforcement Impact Fees
2. $307,477 - Penalties paid from jail secuíily system contractor
and remaining amount from 2005 General Fund Reserve Fund
S 492,500 To be paid from Law Enforcement Impact Fees collected July-December
2004. Estimated S160,OOO/month by Sheriff's Office.
S1.492,500 Total
Oi.1A/jc 04-1 L4
c: Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Dan Mcintyre, County Attomey
Marie Gouin, Management and Budget Director
Ken Mascara, Sheriff
Garry Wilson, Chief Deputy
Toby Long, Finance Director, Sheriff's Office
" , 8", _D',".: - . ','.", "_ '1' .':', c ~ -.. '! ,- ......, r- ¡ ",,' --
\:.1_, ....¡ _I) ¡.-;I:-.~t.~a...-.:.,:
,... -. . . - - - --
" I .::..~S:.:.~.;.... ,:'
~
~-7~~ F'=~~:;O:~~ ll-S:~~:
.\ IE t\ 10 RA:\'D lj~ I
TO:
Doug Anl~~r.scJ:, CC';!i1!Y Admi:li~r:¡¡!t1:
Fflord:
Toby LrJ!1i!, Djrt':'(ú~ tìfEnJtl:~. 1l"'''--
D.-' 7£: JlI!: ~\ 200~
SUBJECT: Lii".... Er.tim:;;:n~:1; F~t's
cc: Kerr J. !v1:b::ara, S::'t¡'¡ff
G:my Wilst~n, CI::~:'D¡:pu~>'
Jð r. ( d
t 1 t '\
YIJl1 h~..:I ~:J,t'~~ T:1:' tù give )\.HI :\:. t'~:;r:-;:';íe of(h.~ .'.\n1o:n:!": eo:" i;:~.pi1ct f-=es tÌ':...:t '....:ill b~ \.'t~lk:',~:.j ii,
tbe 111;'>:1 ii::;c::! ':ear IÌ'om th~ :H'\',' :'-1'.,' E::¡"o:';':t':j~;:,:-,¡ Im;"::J~'( F~:? ¡ :~';1]Y C':':1flO! '~:Cll1a[ê' (h::.!:
;":lH>\\rH b(';>:I'¡~~' I do ¡we 11:;\.= :):~ "::n., as r,) 111; p:,,)je.:::d b0\1:ing St;1r.~ i:: P.)r! St. L'.lcj.." Fi.
lii'rCi:, ~:. L:::i~ ViIh1~(:. ¡¡,d 0.(' ~i:::L'J'F0r:\t~t! CÙ1l!',r)', 0:- for rhac 1l11'!':er th~ IX'Jj~;;t-=d ntJc,b~r
(,f nmJti·t:ì'1:;i:; uniTS er ~olìlm~r.:-i~: building). A :~('t::¡: ¡jíJ:l;; in the k'C'\l ne\\"$ p~I;.'=r s¡,;jd Û1~IL
1hL':~ ,,"¡c"r~ J~),.)OO J¡')l1sjug :Dr.S ;¡: St. L\1,:i" ('oll:1:Y i:: 2iYJ3. Th~' ir;·,pact :-;-; is :; 169 or! <,11
sing1t fLil,i!:: :\."iT1::'i ~" b;l~t'.J ,:r: L:~ rt·p·.:rt...d ?crinits ::1 2003 th~ amo:m: ·.'..ou!d hi;: in c,);ce5S l'f
SI/Hj¡),(j(JU.
.t ,_ C U -.) ", ,
";/ \... ,-
I, i/ fiJ >
Î/ /11'1'"
/
ir-- --'
.'
,
.'.... :...
I .." - ,-. - ._, ""'"'::
( "'. .-' ~;'. . - ,.., ,,-
t..-:il_' -~.~._-~~ -~:::-:-.:- ':-.:
~ -/3- ¿/ ¿) þ-? v- J/; /.4¿......'
ð ,;I ( frr' ~ð?-Î-
~
. .
T,-~ ~: ::.,:~.;¡ ¡¡r~ Ir,z amou,,:5 ri!;~~s:i!:: bJ·tr.Z S:1~ri:1
fr.::S ~-:.:i.'::~s
5:'~;l ~:-.j S!ner.:s
í:c',·.·.; ~S!5
F¡ ,;.:, ~'3';1'pOlïgra;¡h
E:~: .,,; LiatJili:y 1r15U"i1CZ
E:, ~'; -:-.!¡";:
E,:. -:: ~:r CO'J:1:Y COr1s::~::':i1 CO:1~rë:t
.'¡" ~.~,::,~;.·,..-;¡!er t. seser
__¡:. ~.';=:'al costs
I-.-¡:~ P:..::d
C : ',-,; ë'.d Bedding
..¡_::~.' S\.'"pli~s
r:~-::...~5, shacles. s~~\J~;:-: j:~,7,S
p::: ï:<¡s'del¡','zr'/ carts
:;E....::: çæ~
C'. ;:'~:-;
:_:;:~~~ Ove:'1:me ëlnd ê~:",=:'~;
C. ;.-~,":".e incurred Ihou;~ ;; 3 :/C~
F:::: ::! ~ O'liH~i~e/bcn:",:~
=.:;::;j
C;~-::, Ccr1lra:ls
C,: -~:-.e due to o'/ercrc''',~',;
::.~:
;:'~'::;¡~~~ ar.-:ount ne~j
:; J ,F end
G:::9:0 -.
7è9,222
1.300.~22
(523.9:0)
(2;0,97õ)
""
"
....,
,
I
I
'-'
"'"
/;0
!
( _,uV
_ -~---- p'-;'.'
<2~,7E7,Ç~ ~ ¡.r/i
3:>.:-:') t.) V 1
2~:~.;;.~~ ~ ') rj'~ .;i'
3;,:':·).(') I.'ay be pz;d l:o:T1I~;:act rz~s 7 ~.
52ì.~ï7.~:' 5)0,0=0 is ir1 1M Co~nt,/s curre ~t¡'C;;~: /It/:?j~Olc, () 0
~.fZi'bzpa:d.' '.''''r'~:(Fe~s..
. ..~ "...~l:a,ç;ht Ilmz 2:1~ c,..e~lm~
vV
!S{JOf! tr/}/~ /
r tJ1/ (UJ
If//:; ß) ~ J ,'.
~¿,D
// Fr'.!
) ýv- ¡
,.,~ C
,/ ,/ "
ú,..J II P/.J
c/'./ '1-
¡.v,' ¡ò /
I~-
55.'::.:'J.Ú() /-.: I~,i! I;me tr.z bu~;¡~: wH be':1g pr~;Jar~~
é:71:Junts v,ere runö:nç; 2~OU:1; 20,000 peõ 17:-~··::
2~().CO() pzr year 03'C,; b:.:c;e: vr.¡s 275,C::. ;::-:,;",:.
2,'2 cu:-rer1t1¡ runn:::g o'/er 30.000 pzr fõo"':''.
52..7::~.25 Tnis ir.crease is based on t'1e per diem r.:e :o.¡';¡:
by U'1e provider ($1.65) per dzy per if\ma:~ c.:: ¡¡ :.;¡ 0:
'050 inmz!eS
77.7:!.J.'~ Tnis increase is bzsej on t".e standard (T'.e¡· ...::::
$,503 per meal
, '5.:-=-5.",;) I.'zy be paid Irom ¡'-'pacl Fees
~ ~.2;~,C() 'Trois is I~~ a:710uõ1t o'lzr b'J·~;el due to 0.;':::,'-:-;
~5.ï75,C() T~;. is méï be pa:d Ir::~ jf','1;¡a:t lees
i:.137.C'J Tr.i. mZi' b~ pai~ :r:;:71 ir.;Ja:1 fees
3,:-=..3CJ Fo: dryers
.:~.~~.C'J
1.S::¿;.~':a,47
\,
_\
~/
1.~;2.:':'J,C)
-~
/'
D'
~
..",,¡
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM NO. R A-1
ff~-~
DATE: July 27, 2004
REG U LAR [x]
PUBLIC HEARING [ ]
CONSENT [ ]
,
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
PRESENTED BY: ROGER A. SHINN
DIRECTOR
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CENTRAL SERVICES
SUBJECT: THE PURCHASE OF TENTS AND NECESSARY ITEMS FOR MINIMUM-SECURITY
INMATES AT ROCK ROAD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY AND RETRO·FIT DORM A-1 TO MEDIUM
SECURITY. ($74,360 Construction and $36,238 Furniture/Equipment)
BACKGROUND: SEE A TrACHED MEMO
FUNDS AVAIL: 310003-1930-562000-100 (Impact Fees - Public Building)
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: Staff is requesting a Bid Waiver and emergency purchase of tents and
necessary items to establish this arrangement at the Rock Road Correctional Facility at a cost not
to exceed $111,000 including furniture and fixtures.
MISSION ACTION:
I)G APPROVED [] DENIED
r1 OTHER: Approved 5-0
ENCE:
D u Anderson
County Administrator
Coordination/Signatures
Mgt. & Budget:
Purchasing Mgr.:
c: _ -~i Attorney:
Other:
Other.
O¡;-¡¡ting Dept:
FI¡;-:e: (Check for Copy only. if Applicable)
Eft. 1/97
\.f
...,
óf!>t'V&An·}'~~~<,r;~r,:."~; !;-_.'"C,:,' '>.: ' ".
~~1.tÇ'~~~~'\~~~~_ ~.. t!.... .~ - ... '. . P" J .
l\1EMORANDUM
,,' ·.;,,:^,·.'::1~~);:Z{'~-~.f~:-?¡·.',; ;:. . "'¡~ ." :.; :",
DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL SERVICES
,
TO: Board of County Commissioners
FROM: Roger A. Shinn, Director
DATE: July 13, 2004
SUBJECT: Rock Road Jail Inmate Housing FacilitylMinimum-Security
................................................................................
In an effort to approach the' need for additional inmate housing at Rock Road Jail in a cost effective
manner, staffhas been directed to go with tent housing for the minimum-security inmates. This type
of structure has been utilized to house minimum-security inmates in tbe past at this location, and still
remains a most economical solution.
Below is a breakdo\\TI of cost associated with using US Military General Purpose Tent Systems. To
house ninety-six inmates, staff will need to purchase eight tents and each tent will measure 16' x 32'
and house approximarely twelve (12) inmates. Each tent will require a 16' x 33' concrete slab; three
already exist, so sraff will need to add five additional pads for the tents.
CONSTRUCTIO:\ ITEMS
COST
· US Military General Purpose Tent System:
· (Eight @ S 1,795.00 each/includes shipping)
· Electrical:
· 16'x33' Concrete Pads (5):
· Permitting:
$15,360.00
SIJB-TOTAL COST:
$ 6,000.00
$13,000.00
$
$34,360.00
· Fencing for rerro-fit Dorm A-I to med. Security:
TOTAL COST:
$40.000.00
$74,360.00
ADDITIONAL ITE'IS
. Fixtures, Furniture, Equipment:
COST
$36,237.68
'-'
'WI
No, 0 2 C 9 f' , 2
. .
Jul. 26 2004 3:23FM
:)
.... '.
-. ,. .
," I ~. r
. '~:,~ '.:~: '~t'':-
;~~:~.:\
"',
'to
MEMORANDUM
\
To:
Roger ShIan, Central Services
St. Lucie County
Major F. Patrick Ti¡he, Director {1
Department of Detention
From:
Date:
July 26, 2004
Subject:
Furniture; Fixture and Equipment - Tent City
I have attached an itemized Furniture, Fixture and ~wpment budget of 518,188.84 that is
required to operate a SO bed prisoner unit.
The current plan for temporary structure is to house 100 prisoners. whicb will increase 1his budget
proportionately to $36,237.68.
If you have any questions or require clarification on any of the items. please call me directly at
462-3396.
C: wI attachment
Gany Wilson, Chief Deputy
Toby Long, Financo Director
F"de
. ,'-,j'
,' :', "',
'", ",
" '. ,
, . ,
:. ,;.: ..¡ .." " :
',,1 , ",I
-',:.,.::'
': .
. ," "
'. ~,.
:-; ..
\~" ,~ ','
.", .
'.;', . :
:.~ . . . . . .
....
" ,
..';
'.
: ,\...,
',':' "
0', :...
'. . ," ~. ,: .
". . ' ,'L . "
f;', : ;~,,: .
',':',; I
" . "':': .
,.' .
,,'. .'.'~' .
:.
.:. :..:.
'.;" .
:." '.
. ,,'
. "
"
. ' ,
.. .
.' ,
.'". .
, . .
"
'",; .
/. ".
, .
, .
!..
: I
....
, ,
,
, '
.' .
"
.' "
'. '..
, '
. "
......
(,' .,,~ ~"'''I/:: 3·23~'¡I1.Ì:Z~~:7
.. '. . ~. i. y. L.· '. "T . . I
SLC JAIL ~~p~
\:.:::2;;9 r. 3 t:~
. .
, ,
" . .
I.···:'·.
ITEMS QTY. COST EXTENDED COST
STORAGE LOCKER 4x4' 1 156.95 155.95
CHAIRS (DEPUTY'S) 2 128.34 128.34
-
PHONES 1 24.95 - 24.95
FILE CABINET (2 DBA WER) 1 81.40 B 1.40
LAUNDRY II; LINENS SO 69,16 3,488.00
CLEANINO 1 2~9.86 229.86 I
SUPPLIES "CHEMICAL S I
MATTRESS &PILLOW 50 66.68 3,334.00 0
FIRE EXTINOUISHERS(5#ABC) 2 51.00 ' 11.4,00
FOOD CMT 1 650.00 . 650.00 :
FOOD TRAYS . SO 15,00 750.00
BID.'KS (DOUBLE 27"x76"xS2") 2S 280.00 1,000.00 0
2S"T,V. 1 250.00 250.00
10 GAL. WATERJŒG 1 43.15 43.15
--
WATER KEG CMT 1 99.85 99.85 I
--
J~\1rORIAL CART I 104.95 104.95
---
MOP BUCKET &WRINGER. 1 48.47 48.47 :
,
HAm. -CUPPERS 2 64.24 128.48
MAOUTES 1 78.00 78.00
FIRST AID KIT ) 70.12 70.12
--
GARBAGE CANS 2' 6'9.16 138.32
COMPUTERA:HAR.DW ARE 1 l,200.0( ] ,200.00
TOTAL SJ 8,118.84
:
"
. I,
. '
, .
..
'.
R ec e i y d T ¡:I" e J L: !. 26. 2: 21 PM
\.,;
'...I
/
~...~t:. 1",-, '1:'" ~ .
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
RE:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
EMORANDUM
04·158
_._------~------_..--
Douglas M. Anderson
unty Administrator
July 23, 2004
Summary of Board Action Taken at 7/22/04 Special Board of County
Commissioners' Meeting
Below is a summary of Board action taken at the July 22, 2004 Special Board of County
Commissioners' Meeting:
2003/2004 Cost Overruns/Shortfalls
The Sheriff requested $1,492,000 to fund this shortfall. The Board agreed to fund the
shortfall with $1,185,000; $685,000 of the funding is to come from existing Correction
Impact Fees and the remaining $500,000 is to come from budgeted Reserves that were
setup during the 2003/2004 Budget process in the event of cost overruns at the jail for the
hiring of new correction officers.
2004/2005 Budqet
The Board approved the following for the jail's 2004/2005 Budget:
$16,200,000
400,000
$16,600,000
2,000,000
$1816001000
2.000.000
$20,600,000
Existing jail funding
Increase approved at 7/22/04 Board Meeting
Subtotal- 1,050 Inmates
Pod #1 - 288 Inmates
Subtotal- 1,338 Inmates
County Reserve to be used towards opening of Pod #2 should this
occur. Should Pod #2 not be opened and the number of inmates in
the existing jail and in Pod #1 exceeds 1,338 inmates the Sheriff can
request funding for incremental costs, Le., food, medical, clothing,
waterlsewer, etc. with support documentation.
Sheriff's Adiusted Fundinq Request
The Sheriff originally requested $1,492,000 as outlined above to cover shortfall overruns in
2003/2004 Budget, which is $307,000 more than the Board approved. The Sheriff is
requesting $307,000 be taken from the $18,600,000 in the 2004/2005 Budget and be
added to the $1,185,000 that was approved for cost overruns. The $307,000 will come
\.f
...,
Page 2
July 23, 2004
Summary of Board Action
from 2003/2004 cash carried forward and subsequently the $18,600,000 will be reduced by
the $307,000 leaving a balance of $18,293,000 in the 2004/2005 Budget. Staff is
preparing an agenda item for the Board's consideration for Tuesday's Board Meeting to set
up this funding.
$18,600,000 Total Budget before the Reserve
307.000 Transferred to 2003/2004 Budget
$18,293,000 Revised 2004-2005 Budget before the Reserves
GPS/Electronic Monitorinq
Staff will be preparing an agenda item for Tuesday's meeting on whether or not staff will be
recommending to declare an emergency to purchase a GPS/Electronic Monitoring System
for release of inmates without going through the RFP process.
Tent City
Staff will be preparing an agenda item for Tuesday's meeting requesting the Board declare
an emergency to go ahead and purchase tents and retrofit Dorm A-1 at the jail. The tents
will be used to move the minimum-security inmates out of Dorm A-1, while at the same
time Dorm A-1 will be retrofitted with steel cages to house medium security inmates. Tent
City will be used until Pod #1 comes on line, which is expected in June 2005. The Sheriff
has informed us that this action will not impact the jail's operating costs.
DMAlab 04-158
c: Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney
Marie Gouin, Management and Budget Director
Roger Shinn, Central Services Director
Ken Mascara, Sheriff
Garry Wilson, Chief Deputy
Pat Tighe, Major - Director of Detention
Toby Long, Finance Director, Sheriffs Office
Public Safety Coordinating Council
Citizens' Budget Development Committee
'-'
....,
ITEM NO. SR-1
DATE: 7-22-04
AGENDA REQUEST
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
REGU AR: (X)
PUBLIC HEA NG: ( )
CONS NT: ( )
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ADMINISTRATION
SUBJECT: Construction of low-tech inmate housing for 100 low-ri~k Inmates, minimum security nmates
and retrofit Dorm A-1 to house medium security inmates
BACKGROUND: See attached July 2, 2004 memorandum, item #1 and backup.
July 6,2004 memo and July 15.2004 memorandum.
FUNDS AVAILABLE: Acct #310003-2330-562000-200-Correctionallmpact Fees - $4 0,000
Acct #310003-1930-562000-1 OO-Other Public Facility Impact Fees- 1 1 000
$6 1.000
PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A
RECOMMENDATION: The Citizen's Budget Development Committee recommended (9-1)
Board of County Commissioners proceed with the construction of 2 I w-tech
air-conditioned steel structures and the retrofitting Donn A-1 at a co t not to
exceed $560,000, the Committee further recommended that the Board declare
an emergency and authorize staff to negotiate and enter into a contra t not to
exceed $560.000 to construct these facilities. This excludes $5 ,000 in
furniture and fixtures. If the Board concurs with this recommendati n, Staff
recommends that the Board of County Commissioners proceed ith the
construction of one low-tech air-conditioned steel structure to ho se 100
minimum-security inmates and retrofitting Conn A-1 to house medium ecurity
inmates at a cost not to exceed $611,000 including furniture and xtures.
Based on the recommendations oltf1e-='Committee, staff reques Board
direction as to whether to proceed as recommended by the Committ e.
COMMISSION ACTION:
XAPPROVED 0 DENIED
Approved 5-0
o OTHER: MOlion to direct staffro
immediately research lenlS 10 fit
on c~islin¡: slabs and bring bilex
cosl eSlimalcs for the lenIS, It Review and Approvals
was also requested that cost be
broughl back for retrofir.
g County Attorney: g Management and Budget:
Douglas Anderson
County Administrator
9 Purchasing:
º Originating Dept:
º Other:
o Other:
g Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable:
Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to al1end this meeting should contact the SI. Lucie County Community Services Manager .t7 -462-1777
TrD 772-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) pn'or to the meeting,
H\WIN\O WORDIAGENDAW\LOW-TECH7-22-04,DO
..., "
'wi
,--",
~
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
FROM:
Douglas M. Anderson
MEMOR~NDUM
04-152
TO: Board of County Com
\
unty Administrator
DATE:
July 16, 2004
RE:
Construction of Low-Tech Inmate Housing Facility
The Citizens' Budget Development Committee has recommended to the Board, 9-1 to
construct two 50 inmate steel/ow-tech housing facilities with insulation and air conditioning
and retrofit Dorm A-1 to house medium security inmates in an amount not to exceed
$560,000. If the Board recommends to proceed, staff recommends on'e building to house
100 inmates, which would be more cost efficient. The air conditioning is $70,000. This
cost also includes additional restrooms and shower facilities totaling $100,000. To this
amount, S51 ,000 must be added for furniture and fixtures, bringing the total project cost to
$611,000. The estimated annual increase in electricity costs will be $15,000. Roger
Shinn, Central Services Director, is getting additional quotes for this project. Staff
anticipates from start to finish the project taking six months. The Citizens' Budget
Development Committee recommends declaring an emergency and authorizing staff to
enter into a contract not to exceed $560,000 to construct these facilities. The Sheriff
estimates the first year operating costs, January-September 2005, to be $950,904. After
that point, the estimated annual operating cost is $ 963,837.
DMNjc 04-152
c: Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney
Marie Gouin, Management and Budget Director
Ken Mascara, Sheriff
Garry Wilson, Chief Deputy
Toby Long, Finance Director, Sheriff's Office
Pat Tighe, Major - Director of Detention
H~\WIN\O WORD\AGENDAW\LOW_ TECH7-22-04,DOC
'-'
....,¡
"
0,
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
DATE:
Board of County comft\sio
Douglas M. Anderson~nty Administrator
July 2, 2004
MORAN DUM
04-137
.. 8 " ":1
..--.--.--...'---
TO:
FROM:
RE:
7/2/04 Citizens Budget Development Committee
The Citizens Budget Development Committee made the following recommendations to the
Board of County Commissioners:
1) Move forward with the construction of 2 low-tech, 50-person each steel
buildings with air conditioning and insulation together with expansion of the
toilet and shower facilities. Also, retrofit the existing dormitory to house
medium security inmates. The total cost approved $560,000.
(Approved 9-1)
Note: County staff is getting additional quotations for the low-tech facilities. The annual
operating cost excluding electricity was projected at $1,222,000 by the Sheriff's
Office. I have requested Toby Long to reduce this number by using existing staff to
run this facility for the first year of operation. He is preparing a revised budget.
2) Proceed with the bid process for an electronic monitoring GPS system for
release of inmates.
(Approved 10-0)
Note: The Sheriffs Office working with a contractor of this equipment identified 100
inmates that could be released under this system.
3) Reimburse the Sheriff's Office Budget $1,492,500 for 2003/2004 cost
overrunslprojected shortfall from the following funds:
$500,000 - Sheriff salary reserve fund
$510,000 - Law Enforcement Impact Fees - To be collected July-
September 2004
$482,500 - Designated from the $8,400,000 - Emergency County
Reserves
$1,492,500
(Approved 10-0)
\wi
'-I
Note: The $482,500 should be partially reimbursed through penalties assessed against
the jail security system contractor. This number includes projections for July -
September 2004. Toby Long said he would request reimbursement as needed and
the Sheriff's Office may not need the full amount ($482,500). The emergency
reserves could be replenished over 3 months, January-March 2005 through Law
Enforcement Impact Fees or as recommended by the Citizens' Budget
Development Committee from the estimated $9,000,000 being generated by the
unbudgeted revenues being received from the increased property values.
Finally, we are waiting for the revised operating budget for the new jail pods. I have
requested a 5-year projection.
Please find attached 2 documents distributed by the Sheriff's Office at the Citizens' Budget
Development Committee meeting (attachments 1 & 2), and attachment 3 distributed by
Roger Shinn of County Staff.
DMAljc-04-137
Attachments
c: Citizens' Budget Development Committee
Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney
Marie Gouin, Management and Budget Director
Ken Mascara, Sheriff
Garry Wilson, Chief Deputy
Pat Tighe, Major - Director of Detention
Toby Long, Finance Director, Sheriff's Office
Public Safety Coordinating Council
'-
'will
r
,~ ...- ,.' ·'·~::z~q-ll ":'~:~~~'::;~;,,",?\
k..___.... ....:.;..t....~._....~....."",:....1
ITEM N
DATE:
\..-' -~'- ~---..... '~
~ - - ,.....;.....
~ ,..' -, ~ ~~;;..'''. ~,~~
~t.\.:~.,..~~..,.'~
-- ,... ... '('. . . . ,--..-;.-.
l!." ".,:..1 ·;...;l\'ar. P.'.....~-,:-.,
.. _........-.,;,~__.. , . - _..._...1
AGENDA REQUEST
:ã-..:J~::.:1:~¡:¿;'';·::-f:;:;\r:~-¿~:::J
REGUL
PUBLIC HEARl
CONSE
TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS
\
SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ADMINISTRATION
Do glas~;' ndersen
, CountfAd inistrater
Sheriff's request fer reimbursement of cost overruns/projec,ted~2all in 2003/2004 b
dget.
SUBJECT:
BACKGROUND:
See attached July 2, 2004 memorandum, it;m #3 and the attached July 6 2004
memorandum.
FUNDS AVAILABLE:
~492,500
I~OTAL
Acct #001-9910-599300-800 - General Fund-Emergency Reserve """$307 477)
Acct #001-2300-599043-200 - General Fund (5500,000)
Law Enforcement Impact Fees ($685,023)
PREVIOUS ACTION:
N/A
RECOMMENDATION:
The Citizens' Budget Development Committee recommends reimbursi 9 the
Sheriff's Office an amount not to exceed $1,492,500 for the 2003/2004 b dget
year.
COMMISSION ACTION:
X APPROVED 0 DENIED
ù OTHER: Approved 5-0
Molion to appro\'e 1.185.000,00
With 5500.000,00 coming from
reserve sel aside this yrnr and
685.000,00 from correction Review and Approvals
impact fees,
º- County Attorney: q Management and Budget:
b~l.-
D ~Ias Anderson
County Administrator
q Purchasing:
,º Originating Dept: g Other:
º Other:
9 Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable:
Anyone \I'¡~h a dlsabiliryrequiring accommodations to at/end this meeting s/:;:~";j contact th~ s: L~: ~ Co::".y Community Se,-vi::es Manager al 7ï2 52·1777
or TTD 772-462-1428, ilt teast 48 hours (48) pnor to tile meetmg,
H .'.'I:~: '...:'<~·AGëNOAW\SHERIFF BUD REIMB 7·13-04 DOC
'-'
....,
{:~:.~=~~ "::. '·~;·~~~=~::·'~==:J=~2Y~. .::. :"j
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
~-kJ;" :' f -U' -- .o:f:i1-
I' I - .~~,.--.""
~ - ,;;;.......:, ;""r...
r.;, cf'.·' ',.,. :" =.?''':;r"';fs._..;ç:¡:,~j ':~ ~,~ryj
, '. \; _. ,'". -',·i. .",-
~ (,-,. oTII l~h r:) r,:,·,"~.."j'~'\':
¡_LP'[,~_~L\~t]=~Œ.iEt~t~~~::;~
~::~~·~'~.~=·~~;;·~~.:,~:,,,~~::·2~ ~·:::i=·:~·:··::~'~·=;.:~~~~~i.7J
MEMORÄNDUM
04-144
E:.:::~~~;¡z:::r-~":'11-""~F...~..:r...~~~.~.:~t;¡~!~~~~7'?'E..~"~' .~;"¡iI::'~-::~~~..L.-~':""'~
TO: Board of County com;;{siþq ,
FROM: Douglas M. Anderson,/J!u~ty Administrator
DATE:
July 7, 2004
RE:
Reimbursement of Sheriff's 2003/2004 Budget in an Amount Not to Exceed
S í ,492,500
::a:z::=-wCõ~""":""""·" --..... ....-~-
----
--
The Sheriff has ijentified '$1,492,500 in cost overruns and projected shortfalls for the 2003/2004
fiscal year, See attached breakdown. The Citizens' Budget Development Committee recommends
reimburseí'ìient using the following funding sources:
$5(::),OOJ
Sheriff salary reserve funds established by the Board of County
Commissioners
$5CD,OOO
Loan from County's emergency reserve funds ($8,400,000) to be repaid
from:
1, S192,523 - Jan-Mar 2005 Law Enforcement Impact Fees
2, 5307,477 - Penalties paid from jail security system contractor
and remaining amount from 2005 General Fund Reserve Fund
$ 492,500 To be paid from Law Enforcement Impact Fees collected July-December
2004, Estimated $160,000/month by Sheriff's Office.
$1,',92,50J Total
DMA/jc 04·1 ~~
c: Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Dan Mciíltyre, County Attomey
Marie Go~in, Management and Budget Director
Ken Mascara, Sheriff
Garry VVi!son, Chief Deputy
Toby Long. Finance Director, Sheriff's Office
H ,\'JI:',r: '.'IOROAGENDAVV\SHERIFF BUD REIMB 7-13-04 DOC
fil1-Ø:3-'C~ 1::::,3 ¡:~;;."¡1-5,:· F¡;~:;,-:
\w
TO:
FRor·,'1:
11.-\7£:
SUBJECT:
cc:
77 2~~2:~2~5
¡\1EMORA~DUM
Doug And:rsC'E, C C)~lnty Admi;1i~t:';!tt"
Toby Long, Di!="t'j~ (¡ffinaIlc~, fv/
¡
hlly 81 1004
L' E - F
;i'.V ..r:tl)r¡;çm~::: i:~$
Ktn .I. Mag~::J.r;;¡, S::'triff
Garry Wilson, C!-.:~:' D::puty
'wII
~-7:.2 p=~ ~~/l1:~: l;- ~j~::~:
,
~ {, l { vI
r 1 \ ì
y 0ll h~.d ~t~.;t'\~ T;le t~ ~iVi: you :'C. v::~¡iI;¡:II: of 111.. 3nlOl:n: orïmp,~çt f;es tt:'1 -.;,:ill ~i: \.:Gl1~~·':.=d i;-,
tbe ne:.:t 11~C;,! '.'~ar !Tom th;- !1~"; .;...;:¡w E:~~o:';.:e¡j':t:-;: Imp.!(;l F~:.? ~ really c¿"no! c~:cula¡e lh;:!!
¡'¡:110't,\!H bc-Uh¡~::'- I (10 nùt h:w~ :::'::' ·:8ta as to) tll;; r;'ojee,:å hou:ìng st(\r,~ L-: Pi)r1 St. L'.J.çir~, Ft,
l'it'ïc:e, S:, L1Ciç \'ilj¡:l~é. ilr:: :.:¿. ~nin~ürForat,d COllnr)', or for that Ill;!,t~e!' t~e p,'oje;;teò nL1E:b~r
Ctfmulti-få!ì1';i::unÍT5 cr cOln;:ì:r~::1: buihung$, A ,~¡:,~n~ íirtjcl-= jn the local news p[lptr Sfij,j ilia!
ihere ';'¡f.:ré ] O)UO h~)t1sjl1g s:..~r:s ,;: St. L\I;;lC ('o,¡:1:Y in 2003. The ir:;.pact ~-te is ) 169 on all
singk fami!;: t~'.m~c; :;<1 hast:~ ':'.. L:;.' rt'p';:)It~d pC:11ܡS in 2003 the ammm: -.';cuId be in e>~c~ss of
S1/HJO,OOlì.
:r- .-
:.
"
" ...' :_, L
I' ::
rI. C () 0
.,'l...J, "/
1;;-'" f¡J>
7/ /7 N"
...- ~
\ ' ,..-
'-.;.~---,- .:~.~ . ~-. ~ rl.:::: "
('\-1 r',·-':; . ::..---
L-:'" ~--_..-------
,-J V 3 tft/orY?~""'/íl /.4¿-) _
() --. A,.~ ~P.4t.-1
~ ~
\w'
'-.,J
()
/}
T.-!:: ::,.,;~.g are the amou,,:s r=q'J~s:;d by U'1e She,~:f
(
V
/lU'
(.¡I
pY'1'
iff
LJlV fl'
/v~ 0°
ojOIO
,~~'" ~-:.:i.:~:~S
S¡';:-:' .~,d Benerils
í:i,-:,-,; c..::sts
;: ¡. :';-, !X3r.1/polygraph
:: ::-.: ë~~ Liability Insuran~e
E:.':-;'7·!t::
!¡;:-_ -:; ~:r County Cons::u::::n Cc::::a:t
J:', _:-:::¡;S·'.vater & sewer
1,--.:: ~.!:d¡cal costs
I~-:-.:: f:.:;d
C :',-,>; 2~d Bedding
.,.-:::~.: 5upplie~
:-:.-::.:':5, shacles. se:uri)' i:::;1s
::::: T:Ö¡S'delivery carts
:~:~....:: ;ëS
C'.::-:::-,¡;
=_:;::!å Overtime Clnd è::,:~¡S
:'. :,-:,-;:: incurred thou;~ =,'31/C~
f:::::::d overtime/ben:~:>
:.:;:::d
C:'.::;' Ccntracts
C. :-::::: due to overcr:......;:,;;
...-'
,~.-::::;.:e:: amount nee~
::::::end
;;,~-~
3 0.2':-:¡ , (.0.) '\"
II õ,:.:-J,OO "
25'c:-:':¡,(j() ~--- .'
I 35.[·:·J,OO I.~ay be paid from 1r,;;J=ct fees ;/"...
\ 527.4 T7 ,~5 50D.COO is in the c:z: t;Cd;,,:
~~'1~'OO ',lay be pard [ror...-f....,ect Fees.
~~;9ht time and evertime
S5.C-::.:¡,QO At the ti:ne the budge: w~ being p:e;Jë'::
a..,ounls v,ere runr.ing a:ow;;g 20.CJO Ç':: :7J,¡:'; cr
240.000 per year 03·0~ bud;;e! was 275,(:), ;_7,:';~:>
are currently running o'Ier 30.000 ç:e: r.:..,:,'
52,7~,25 This increase is based on the per die:;-; :=:e c~.:;::j
by Uie provider (S 1.65) per day p:r i;;ITi,,:: C":.: 2 C<!¡:> of
1050 inmates '
77.733,14 Tnis increase is base:J on the sta.¡j2:d r.:.' r:::e cf
5,909 per meal
11 õ.~,1 0 I.!ay be paid rrom Impact Fees
41.393,CO 'This is Ihi! amou;;1 O'li!r b'Jdget d'Je!t) c;=·:r:,,';,,~
25,77Õ,CO This is may be pa:d rrorn impact fees
1 õ.13 7 ,00 This may be pa,id Ire.., im¡:>ac! fees
3,:~,C'J For drye:s
~"-'_._'
: , 523,9:J
·0
5CV(~/}~ /
r 6P71/ .
(¡;P~~d'"
~O
// ,1/}-"..I
'n/' çr,i
0',S ¡}~C
Ú,.--i Ii ¡y)
c/ './ .r¡' -
¡,V { /1'0
ß-
7ô9,222
V, J
C
1.30D,~22
(523,9:J)
\
\
(2S0,97õ)
4~.4~.C·J
1.S29.4~ö.4 7
\
_\
\ .-
~.-.
1.452,:-:':),CO
.--..J
~r ff;v
'f/.~
~
"WI
, .
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
M MORANDUrvl
O~-137
DATE:
3J?íd of County com~SiO e \
(\
DJuglas M. Anderson ounty Administrator
J,-ily 2, 2004
TO:
FROM:
RE:
ï!2/04 Citizens Budget Development Committee
The Citizens 8'Jdget Development Committee made the following recommendations to the
Board of CC".::;~,/ Commissioners:
i) :.:ove forward with the construction of 2 low-tech, 50-person each stee:
':uildings with air conditioning and insulation together with expansion of the
:J:!et and shower facilities. Also, retrofit the existing dormitory to house
:îledium security inmates, The total cost approved $560,000.
:/\pproved 9-1)
Note: CO'...<:' staff is getting additional quotations for the 10v/-tech facilities. The annual
ope:?',:1g cost excluding electricity VIas projected at 51,222,000 by the Sheriffs
O;;:~, I have requested Toby Long to reduce this number by using existing staff to
r~:; :~:s facility for the first year of operation. He is preparing a revised budget.
2) Proceed v/ith the bid process for an electronic monitoring GPS system fo:-
release of inmates,
(,D.,pproved 10-0)
Note: The S~ariffs Office \'/orking with a contractor of this equipment id entified 10J
¡:ìiì~?~:;S that could be released under this system.
3) Reimburse the Sheriffs Office Budget 5 1.492,500 for 2003/2004 cost
overruns/projected shortfall from the following funds:
$500,000 - Sheriff salary reserve fund
5510,000 _ Law Enforcement Impact Fees - To be collected Ju1j!-
September 2004
$482,500 _ Designated from the 58,400,000 - Emergency County
Reserves
51,492,500
t .A '" 1'\\
· '
\w'
\J
Note: The $482,500 should be partially reimbursed through penalties assessed against
the jail security system contractor. This number includes projections for Ju:y -
September 2004. Toby Long said he would request reimbursement as needed and
the Sheriff's Office may not need the full amount ($482,500). The emergency
reserves could be replenisheå over 3 months, Janua¡:y-March 2005 through La\'.'
Enforcement Impact Fees or as recommended by the Citizens' Budget
Development Committee from the estimated $9,000,000 being generated by the
unbudgeted revenues being received from the increased property values,
,
Finally, we are waiting for the revised operating budget for the ne"'/ jail pods, ha'/e
requested a 5-year projection.
Please find attached 2 documents distributed by the Sheriff's Office at the Citizeiìs' Budget
Development Committee meeting (attachments 1 & 2), and attachment 3 distribu:ed by
Roger Shinn of County Staff.
DMA/jc-04-137
Attachments
c: Citizens' Budget Development Committee
Ray \Nazny, Assistant County Adm¡nistrator
Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney
Marie Gouin, Management and Budget Director
Ken Mascara, Sheriff
Garry Wilson, Chief Deputy
Pat Tighe, Major - Director of Detention
Toby Long, Finance Director, Sheriffs Office
Public Safety Coordinating Counsil
~
Current
Property Value Millage
Taxes
Fine & Forfeiture
$13.496,591,294
3,5066 $47.327.147
Proposed Millage Shift:
Fine & Forfeiture
General Fund
3,3698 $45,480.813
4,0728 $54.968.917
----
Example: ,.., U u Z (;.
Property Value ,- ì -,
Less Homestead Exemption
Assessed Value
Tax Decrease
$13.496.591.294
$13,496.591,294
..""
EXHIBIT B
Millage
Decrease
Decrease
amount-
Proposed
Millage Total Taxes
0,1368 $1,846.334
3.3698 $45,480.813
\
o,o520)701,823
-0,0520 701.823)
----'
3,3178 $44,778,991
4.1248 $55.670,740
2lf41,l.R -I~i/.)
$150,000
$25,000
~
V
[UI'./
1 J'1 '1 t-{
..,
\¡J
AGENDA REQUEST
ITEM 1"0. 8
DATE: July 27, 2004
REGULAR
r X ]
PUBLIC HEARlNG
CONSENT
fO: ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMJ\lISSIONERS
SUB~IITTED BY: OMB
PRESENTED BY: Marie M. Gouin
SUBJECT: Approval of millage rates to be submitted to the Property Appraiser and set dates for public
'ean::~5.
BACKGROUND: The recommended rates were established pursuant to the budget reviews concluded
JY tt:~ Board on July 26, 2004, and as required to meet special district, debt service, and related millage
"equ::;::1ents.
FUT\DS A V AILABLE: N/A
PR.[\"IOl;S ACTION: N/A
RECO~I:\1ENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the following:
I. A;;~o\'e millage rates as outlined on "Worksheet Analysis of Roll-Back Millage Rate for Fiscal Year
2C :":-2005" under the column headed "2004-2005 proposed millage".
Z. s:: 7\\'0 public hearings on September 9 and] 6 at 5:05 P.M. in the Roger Poitras Administration
A:.:::x Commission Chambers.
3. At:~:orize the County Administrator to be able to modify the millage rates between General Fund and
Fi:-.; and Forfeiture Fund as long as the total county wide millage stays the same. Also, Authorizing the
C:"..:,,:::y Administrator to transmit the millage rates to the Property Appraiser on Fonn DR-420.
t. Se: :.:~gregate millage at 8.7530 milJs which is 16.55% over the roll-back rate for ta.x year 2004.
=O\~\I1SSIdN ACTION:
uglas~. Anderson
County Administrator
')q ..1.?PROVED [J DENIED
J OTHER:
Approved 5-0
Coord i nation/Signatures
: ou:::y .-\ tto rn e y: x:< '"'f1sdr' ()r1,
Management & Budget:
, f.l f.^"-'1
¡ ./v,
Purchasing:
)rig-:-,ting Oept:
Public Works:
Other:
"
z C>
~ ~ §
~ ~ ~
... c
-: 0 ;
:r ;: """
· ,... 1/1
~ 0 m
o 'T1 ~
1 ... ñ
~ ~ ~
· 1/1 C
¡ ~
· en
·
~
·
·
"
·
'"
;,
·
..
..
..
i
~
D
¡
~
þ
..
..
;: ..
; . -
~ B·~
.. ..
j.,,¡ "1.01
.. '"
... ..
'"
o '"
:""0
.. '"
... ~
"'.
.. ..
... N
~~
;u<
.... ;¡;
"00
;Uz
01:
"Om
mz
;u ....
~~
III ):
Oz
~c
Œ~,ia
;:: ~ 8 ~ ~
~ ... '" '" ~
~~~8~
æ~~~~
!~~~iiI
...1-6 ê iiI I:
"''''lii
~ g -
~ ~ ~
'" '" C1
i!!!.!!!m
i C Z
~ ~ £
~ ~ ~
Qì=~
~ ~ ~
In ;J..
~~~r
Q8~¡:
", ~ C
o~~
~ iiI 8
~ ! \" .
~~I~
Q m ~
00
~i
N '~
~ ~
'~ '~
00
o
N N
.. '"
o 0
: N Þ ·
~ ¡ ~ ¡
... 'Q)
... '"
'" '"
'~ 'g:
'" ...
o 0
"CD "cD
... N
.IÞ !ZJ
... ~
'" '"
"s '2
... ...
¡;; N
i.ø 'CD
... N
... ...
...., ......
~ ~
'''" "Ut
~ ~
w w
~~
... ...
i i
...... ....,
.. ..
'" '"
...
¡,.
i
.
~
J
iI
.
!'
¡
'0
...
'"
o
'...
'"
..
'..
..
o
~
'"
'"
'.,
'"
'"
'..
'"
..
....
œ
...
¡
..
~
;.,
'"
..
"-r
I
I:
í
~
;u
~
C
Ii
~
",
to c 0
Õ ~ ~
~ 8 ~
~ '" c
.... 2J Z
~~~
.... þ
m"'"
o Cf
'" m
m ;u
'" <
< ñ
1'1 m
m ....
'" þ
)(
z
G)
C
Z
:¡
to
"~-1'1Jï
~ ~ ~ ~ i
~ ~ Z :>< m
,.. Cf '" Z
þ ë3 ¡: ."
i:\ ;J Cf 0
o -1 ..... 2
G)Oþcn
þ .... m
'" Õ ¡:
~ z ~
Z ¡: ...
'" Cf
....
c
...
~
0000000
~ ~ § i ~ ¡ ~
N ... N h.)
N~~'E~I~
'w "Lo)".." 'm N -....,"¡",a
~ fA g w ~ ~ ~
.
000 0 0 0 0
e ~ ~ ~ t ~ &i
.. IØ UI CD ~ - r
l
..
~ ...
...
...
N
N
..
..
N ... N
'0 "N ....
: ::
........ "m
W ~ .
'0
IV ~ ;:ø
.~ ".. ~
CIÞ ~ ...
...
~
...
000 0 0 0 0
.. .. 0 N W .. U\
f ~ 8 8 ~ i ~
N ~
N .N ...
-.. .."at
.. .. '"
... .... ...
W NNW
·w·... '" N
..., at -"' .....
.. 0 .. .N
~~~~
.. ~
U, 'LoI
... ...
'" ,...
8! !!J
o ...
OOUtU',,"
...... ...... "w (..a 'w
f : ~ ~ ~
·.....'f.øCøiÐ
II! II! ~ ~ ~
~"~"!iJ ~ g
&II \II ..... ..... .....
~
N ...
ëa "1;11
.. .. '"
.. at UI IØ
œ w·....,·.....
~ ~ ~ ~
~! -~ ~
"'''''''
~.~ .~
... ... ..
www
~~~
www
III
.w w .m .m .at
.".---
"'~SS~!!:¡.;
~§~~èeè
!~¡~~~~
666666666566666
~ ¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ a ~ ! ~ ~ ~
Q)
Cf ~
0"'"
c ¡:
:t~
~2
Z m
~
:><
Cf
m
II>
....
Þ
....
m
II>
OzllJ-4ð~~
ffi~~ffi!:~~
~zm~~~êñ
UJ::II!<o~m~
8 ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~
~~~ rn~~
'" <
): iñ
.... Õ
¡)¡z
~!£~~
zm:;:a~
~~~~
OO~~
~z:z::z:
;u~~œm
~ ~~
Z ........
Cf "''''
'" E
.... C
'" Z
~ ñ
~ j
::II:Uë)r-
<: <: % en
mm-tm
;u '" ~ ~
~~~n
~~iñm
N _ -4 ~
'" )C
ñ Z
¡jQ
c:
Z
~
o 0 C 0 _ 0 0 - 0 0 - 0 0 0 0
~ i 8 8 I g i ~ ~ ; m ~ ! ¡ i
lit.,) 0." 1.01 IIt.J ¡;:; ....,
è'~¡'~'t§'fi'~
...
N lit CD .... W ca '"
'SZ!'it:.~~'='~'~
èSWIQN..........
o 0 ~ C _ 0 a 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0
ë i § i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ f § ~
~~.~~~t:.~.~
~ ~ ¡;; :j .. g; ~ ~
...
Ncaœ.....wCllfD
"æ '1.01 "", OUt '1It 'CII ....
Õ m ~ 8: ~ ~ ~
o 0 ~ 0 _ 0 0 0 0 0 - 0 0 0 0
~~"'_8~~N~~~~~ãl~~
WON _ m 0 ø ~ .. ~ CII ~ ø ~
N ......_WN!ÐNCII"".....cø·
~~e~§"~~æ~I·5_8~~
~ ..
... '" ..
~ "If]:
iø "0 "-
IStS:
= ~~....w
I~~~~~
;"~~~I~
w~~. ~~ow
~~¡~!~~~.~
~~i~~~~~~
.. ~ & œ ~ ~ ë W w m
~§~·ii!~!~~~~~
.!~.~~~~~~.~~~~
....
! .~
-:::: g
.....
- '"
þ W 0 cO
"~·§"S ~
in "01 N (..I
IIt.J ...., 0 .....
.. .. \11 -
o
W at 0 ... N CI
~5"~i~è
.~~!¡!~
.... ~ ~
ä §'~
~~~
"WI
~
!
I:
~
i
j
i
~ m"C)n
~ ~~~~
§~~ð¡~
gC8~2~
ëñ):ZmZE
;;~~ê°¡=
!:!8¡;1~ ~
~ ~ m
¡¡¡m
I:
e
C1
",
;"I
~
!:
0.... 0 w ...
~¡§~~
..
ß
~
..
.... N
.~ ¡ ~
't s 't
.. ... '"
~ ~
'co ÍI!
~ ...
f:fl
o ...
..
¡"
....
..
Co>
oG'tOIlt.JW
Nt' 0 '" ...
~_~:f:jœ
N cO.....
B
å
'"
Co>
I
'"
..
... ...
~§
g"
'" 8
... ~
._ \Ø m
.....,¡ '-
... N ~
N '" 0
~~~
:¡: .. '"
...
!:
..
Co>
0'" 0 f".I ...
~ r !i! ~ h,)
~ ~ ; ~ tD
¡;
'"
'.
Ii:
~
'"
y§ t~
"m~~-~·~
~"ÞCDO
§5!!~
o
"~
'"
à>
~
...
...
...
000
...... -..........,
r ~ 'R
.... '.. "...
¡g¡g¡s
.... '. ....
... ... ...
'" '" '"
...
'",
...
o
...
...
o
"...
'"
'"
N JIt.I """"
ëa "CD CD
"'''''''
'" .. '"
-....,.~ "....
... ... '"
.. .. ~
.~ ~ ~
... '" ...
W
N
'"
'"
....
II
....
~
.~.~ ~
S S II!
'UI .~ U.
~ ~ ~
NNN
f f ~
Ii
",0
K~
~ i þ
~.
fjj I '"
~ ~, n
~I
;J
i ~! 0
I/IX§
E I' m
~PJI
....:11
~ I; ."
c'"
~~I C)
~S!:t
Iii~§
II ~ -
..
:;
o
:0>
"
V.
%
m
m
....
»
Z
»
,....
-<
to
iii
o
."
:0>
o
,...
,...
œ
þ
n
"
Ii
¡=
~
C1
m
~
....
m
."
o
:0>
."
iii
n
þ
,....
-<
~
;Ð
N
~
N
o
~
'-'
..",¡
EXHIBIT C
"
TO:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
MEMORANDUM
04-161
FROM:
Douglas M. Anderson,
unty Administrator
\
,
DATE:
July 29, 2004
RE: Recent Accomplishments
As you know we continue to compile information for a commissioner-e
of recent accomplishments of St. Lucie County: ~fNr7.1 þ-
1. Taylor Creek Restoration ~,;J (' (Jrls, p ,~tl'()
2. Parks Referendum ~ Sit () ~ "i:.. /-
3. Decrease in Countywide millage rate ' í' a ~ A"
4. Wal-Mart Distribution Center, ¡-IoJ ~
~: ~~ibg~unds & Equestrian Arena Facility 2A1 t.
7. Utilities Agreement with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority (J~
8. New Your Mets 16-year contracVTradition Field ¿;>h'"
9. Administration Building addition and new facade - under construction ,A1
10. Research/Education Park ~
11. Rescue Helicopter and Mobile Command Unit ()ø,1jfl
12. Holiday Pines and Paradise Park stormwater projects / V- , .
13. Investment for the Future .ØJ~
14. Smithsonian Marine Ecosystem Exhibit 1/ ¿
15. Community Transit - fixed transit routes V
16. Walton Road Annex - under construction
17. South County Regional football/soccer stadium
18. Stan Blum Boat Ramp .~
19. Environmentally Sensitive Lands purchases and improvements ¡/¡/J dtf1/~'
20. Art in Public Places l/~
21. Histories and Humanities Museum design
22. New jail pods funding/construction contract
23. Scripps Treasure Coast Publishing Facility
24. North County Charrette
25. South Hutchinson Bike Paths, Phase IC
26. Lakewood Park Bike Paths
27. North County Utility Expansion - under construction
We want to thank all of the Commissioners for their guidance and support in making
81. Lucie County the best place to live.
DMAJjc-04-161
~
~
.'
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
Agenda
Friday, June 18, 2004
7:30 a.m., Conference Room # 3
St, Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex
1. Convene meeting
1.1 Roll Call, announcements
1.2 Minutes
r "..-
tfJ'l C/I ~ _~/O --/~
,~¿,~ IÝ~ ..~
7 /Ar/-LýÞ r
/hP~~)p-- ')
~7/L~~
./"
A &:7 ~~/ð
2. New Business ~' íb-ll' ~L....C-. '7 ...t (/¡?~
S ,2; I Fiscal Year 2004-2005 Highlights "n _ ~_, 0
, T t---- ~'/"7;c;.r-' ¿....- VV¡:;}\..l/,UF-
l' Þ)~ I'0)J/ SflG7.-fl'OG~
S ~rnment ú/
¿'",--h~ ~ext CBC meeting: July 16, 2004
C¡?r'-' L /1 ~~~,
/? ;;?Fvi- ,..-
__1' tC -.//);1
þ~~'
I) b~?
.2.-)
¿><¿;->-/'" ./---.
ß~~/ G~7 ~&--.~ C~T7
V"ð(~9 r r 1 ;~I/; ~ if4.~
~ ~} 7~o/'
VJ~ . ~ ? -1 0
1/ n--P 2.. /J ^ ..(J7 Ç. '" ~ Þ h ð'
?_ 4 ,AJdd-·/~ ~~
y~.
f'
~
...,..."
Draft
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: May 21, 2004
SLC Fairgrounds
Meeting convened at 7:30 a,m,
MEMBERS PRESENT:Kenny Hogan, Ron Parrish, Mark Taynton, John Knapp, Debbie Hawley, Edward
Lounds, Sylvie Kramer, Carl Hensley, and Linda Bartz,
MEMBERS ABSENT:
David F. Samuel, William "Bill"Casey, Paul Young, William "Bill"Casey, Patricia
"Pat" Ferrick and Steven Messer.
OTHERS PRESENT:
Pete Keogh, Sherry McCorckle, Guy Medor, Linda Brown, Jennifer Hill, Ray Wazny,
Doug Anderson and Marie Gouin.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
In lieu of Bill Casey's absence, John Knapp presided the meeting.
MEETING MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the April 16, 2004 meeting, Ed Laounds moved for
approval and Debbie Hawley seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and the motion
passed.
Fiscal Year 2004-2005 Bude:et process
Doug stated that this year staff is facing a big challenge in terms of balancing the budget. The General Fund
(the budget's largest source of revenue) has not increased over the last several years. The costs of the
different County departments have been increasing proportionally to the County's population; consequently,
they have been using more oftheir allocated budgets, reducing drastically the margin offunds carried forward
to the following year's budget.
He numbered several other expenses expected for the next budget (some are set off by inflation, salary and
health insurance increases), as well as costs that will have to be covered by the County due to "Article V
Revision 7" (e.g. the costs for the Juvenile Detention Center - approx. $1.5 MM) and other projects that can
no longer be put-off, such as the expansion of the County Jail.
To balance out these expenses staff has been forced to limit the number of requests for the much needed new
positions, despite the fact that there are more operations to run, such as the Fairgrounds, new parks and
environmentally significant lan<~s and a new County Extension office that should open next Fiscal Year. The
new positions that will be requested are the ones that are indispensable. Staff will forward a copy ofthe list
to CBC members after this meeting,
Staff has been working on projections on the increase expected in property values to determine the revenues
available for the next Budget Year. Once the Property Appraiser announces the percentage the values will
increase, staff will have a better view of the situatuion,
If the values come higher than last year's increase (14%) staff will recommend to the BOCC to set the excess
revenues aside in some kind of contingency fund for the FY2005-2006 Budget to cope with all the
unexpected expenses that could come. Doug stated that the general public has the perception that with every
increase in property values millions of dollars come in as revenue to the County; he clarified every 1%
increase to the property values only generates another $400,000 to the General Fund budget. At the next
CBC meeting staff will most likely be able to provide information on how much the properties values will
increase this year (they are announced officially on July 1).
Mark proposed staff should work on a campaign to educate the public, as it has been done in the past for
other issues (successfully) to create awareness on these matters,
$
~
..."."
Doug also updated committee members on the latest news about the County Jail's operation costs, County
and Sheriff staffs are working together on this matter.
CBC members and staff discussed briefly the issue of raising the homestead tax exemption to $50,000 and
how it would affect the budget if it went on a referendum and passed.
Impact Fees - City of Port St. Lucie's Position
Doug referred to the information mailed to CBC members on this matter these past weeks and stated that
when Mr. Cooper, was confronted on this matter he answered he had never stated the City of Port St. Lucie
would stop collecting the Impact Fees.
Regarding the impact Fees, John Knapp proposed staff should prepare for the Budget Workshops with the
BOCC a detailed estimate of the costs a new home generates. He is ofthe opinion the Commission members
(and general public also) should have a real number of how much a new home impacts the budget,
Staff and CBC members discussed this matter briefly.
SLC FairlZrounds
Pete Keogh, Parks and Recreation Director, stated he was pleased with the way business is picking up for the
Fairgrounds facilities and advanced some of the future plans for this center. He introduced Sherry
McCorckle, Fairgrounds Manager, who gave a brief presentation of the operations,
Sherry invited members to visit the St. Lucie County Fairgrounds, Equestrian & Event Center's (official
name) web page (httD: / /www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us/fairgrounds/index.htm) which has only been up for 2 weeks
and is already generating calls with requests to use the facilities, This website has the rental rates posted
as well as the Calendar of events and a virtual tour of the Fairgrounds.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC meeting will be held on Friday, June 18,2004 at 7:30 a,m., in Conference Room # 3 of the St,
Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex. Topics to be discussed will include highlights of next
year's budget.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 8:37 a.m. and committee members went on a tour of the Fairgrounds facilities,
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
William "Bill" Casey, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
May 21,2004
H:\O SecretarylO OMB\CBC\MinI05 21.wpd
page 2
Below are some images taken at the St. Lucie County Fairgrounds, Equestrian & Event Center,
Following the May 21, 2004 CBC
some members joined staff on a tour of
facilities,
Pete Keogh, Parks & Recreation Director, gave some of the CBC members details on how the
construction of the Equestrian Arena is progressing.
,I'"
,
'-'
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
Agenda
Friday, May 21, 2004
7:30 a.m., St. Lucie County Fairgrounds
15601 W. Midway Rd. - Fort Pierce
/
1.
1.1
1.2
Convene meeting
Roll Call, announcements
Minutes
^
, {tP'
/¡'~b
j,.- ...
£; "" (P'('
2. New Business
2.1 Fiscal Year 2004-2005 Budget process .'
2.2 Impact Fees - City of Port St. Lucie
2.3 SLC Fairgrounds (presentation and tour of facilites)
3. Adjournment
4.1 Next CBC meeting: June 18, 2004
--', ,,---- ,,' :'I
" J]'~ (OJ".,''' r ~ fl W7 r§ '~,
l¡~ I '~~~' ;1' 2004 '1'8
co. ADMIN. OFFICE
.JII'
t
'-'
...,
Draft
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: April 16, 2004
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
David F. Samuel, MarkTaynton, William "Bill"Casey, John Knapp, Debbie Hawley,
Edward Lounds, Sylvie Kramer, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick, Carl Hensley, Linda Bartz.
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Kenny Hogan, Ron Parrish, Paul Young, and Steven Messer.
OTHERS PRESENT:
William W Ritchie, Ken Mascara, Patrick Tighe, Toby Long, Thomas Willis, Lisa
Savage, Howard Osterman, Mike Bowers, Jennifer Hill, Ray Wazny, Doug
Anderson and Marie Gouin.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
Addition - New Cost of County Jail Pods
Bill Casey welcomed members of the Public Safety Coordinating Council, who were invited to attend this
meeting to discuss the current estimated cost to build the two new jail pods.
MEETING MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the March 19, 2004 meeting, David moved for approval
and John Knapp seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and the motion passed.
SLC Jail - Cost of New Pods
Doug explained staff had invited the Public Safety Coord. Council (PSCC) to join this meeting because the
building firm quoted a price for completion of the project and they can only hold the offer until May 1, 2004
to lock the quoted price. Staff will recommend approval at the next BOCC meeting and the PSCC is not
scheduled to meet until after the BOCC meeting. Staff is seeking the CBC and PSCC's endorsement on
moving forward with the project and accepting the new price.
Roger Shinn, Central Services Director stated the Jail Expansion Selection Committee has been negotiating
with the recommended design build firm (Centex Rooney/Schenkel Shultz) to come back to the BOCC with
a reasonable cost to build the two new pods for the jail. These two pods would have a capacity for 576 beds
to house medium and maximum security inmates and the design is focused on minimizing the operation
and maintenance costs. The vendor came back earlier this week with a guarantied fixed price of
approximately $18.955MM, locked until May 1,2004 (increase in cost is due to steel prices escalating).
Doug added that the estimated total cost for the project is $20.5MM (this includes construction cost
$18,955,000, impactfees $388,000, estimated wetland mitigation $240,000, County's consultant $346,000
and contingency for changes initiated only by the County $571,000). The entire project is to be paid out of
revenue from impact fees (Public Facilities and Corrections). He explained the financing aspects.
CBC members and staff also discussed City of Port St. Lucie's Council comments on considering not to
collect impact fees for the County in the future. Staff has scheduled a meeting with the cities to discuss
impact fees and will come back to CBC members with an update on this issue at a future meeting. Pat also
suggested the Sheriffs Dept. staff should bring to the meeting with the cities, population projections (County
residents and jail inmates) to explain why it is so important to the community as a whole to collect the
impact fees.
CBC members inquired about other aspects of the project, such as the urgency to complete the project
(despite the court's efforts to process the cases expeditiously, its getting harder to keep the jail population
within its current maximum capacity, due to St Lucie County's sudden population growth), the time frame
for completion (if the contract is awarded as proposed to the BOCC, the design build firm can begin work
in August of this year and the expansion would be in operation by May 2005) and the immediate need for
an additional new facility (staff is also working on this issue).
..,
"""
"
.
.
Other aspects discussed included roll of the consultant, Sheriffs Dept. involvement/feedback, following the
proper specifications, contingency plans and alternatives for confining (or monitoring) the inmates.
Ed moved to endorse staft's recommendation to go forward with construction of the two jail pods
and accept the vendor's quote, for it is orthis committee's opinion that for the reasons stated before
it is imperative to begin construction as soon as possible. Mark seconded the motion. All members
present voted in favor and motion passed. (For the record, it is here stated that the PSCC members
present concurred with this committee's recommendation).
SLC Utilities
Mike Bowers, Interim Utilities Director and Howard Osterman, utilities consultant, gave a presentation on
the agreement the County made with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and on the County's water utilities
expansion master plan (for details on the expansion plans, please refer to the packet handed out at the
meeting, which contains maps of the areas that will be covered and its costs).
Committee members discussed details of the operations and service area of the proposed utilities system
expansion. They also discussed the investment, costs, revenues and benefit to the community.
Ed moved to endorse in concept the utility expansion master plan for the North County area as wen
as the movement towards Midway and Okeechobee roads area (phase 1) contingent that staff comes
back with updates on the specific plan once it is available. John Knapp seconded the motion. All
members present voted in favor and motion pased.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC meeting will be held on Friday, May 21,2004 at 7:30 a.m., at the SLC Fairgrounds, located
at 15601 W. Midway Rd. in Fort Pierce. Topics to be discussed will include an update on the process of next
fiscal year's budget and the city of Port St. Lucie's position regarding collection of impact fees.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 9:05 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
William "Bill" Casey, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
February 20, 2004
H:\O SecretarylO OMBICBCIMin\04'16,wpd
page 2
'-'
.."
\
.---:'
,
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
FROM:
MEMORANDUM
04-77
Board of County com. is. r~ -
Douglas M. Anderson, . unty Administrator
TO:
DATE:
May 19, 2004
RE:
Constitutional Petition Initiative to Double the Homestead Exemption
Please find attached a report discussing the petition initiative campaign to double the
homestead exemption to $50,000, If approved, this exemption increase would be effective
for assessments in 2005.
St. Lucie County's current operating millage rate is 7.9551. This consists of Mosquito
Control, Erosion, Fine and Forfeiture, and the General Fund. According to our calculations,
if this additional homestead exemption is approved, St. Lucie County's operating millage
rate would increase 1.0265, bringing the total operating millage rate to 8.9816. The
attached published report shows a millage rate increase of $1.0913 to offset the increased
homestead exemption.
As I receive additional information regarding this initiative, I will be forwarding it to you.
DMAlab 04-77
c: Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney
Marie Gouin, Management and Budget Director
Jeff Furst, Property Appraiser
Citizens' Budget Committee
Attachment
"
'-'
$25,000 Homestead Exemption
Fund Name
Homestead
Exemption
Current Value
General Fund
Fine & Forfeiture
Erosion
Mosquto Control
1,389,542,378
Current
Millaae
4,0728 $
3.5066 $
0,1000 $
0,2757 $
7.9551 $
....",
Tax Amount
5,659,328,20
4,872,569.30
138,954.24
383,096.83
11,053,949
If an additional $25,000 Homestead Exemption is enacted, In order to recoup the lost revenues, the Countywide
millage would have to be increased as follow:
General Fund
Fine & Forfeiture
Erosion
Moquito Control
Total
Notes:
+ Calculations are based on 2003 Value - 10,777,175,136.
+ Current Millage Rates are adopted rates for tax year 2003 (Fiscal 2003-04).
+ Current Amount of Homestead Exemptions 55,790,
Sources:
1, SLC _ 403AC (The 2003 Revised Recapitulation of the Ad Valorem
Assessment Rolls of St. Lucie County, Florida)
2, St. Lucie County Property Appraiser's Office
0,5251
0.4521
0.0129
0.0364
1.0265
'-"'
'wJI1
\
Attachment 1
Constitutional Petition Initiative to Double the
Homestead Exemption
Jeffery Sauls, a multi-millionaire from Indian River County, is funding
and organizing a petition initiative campaign to double the homestead
exemption to $50,000. The initiative would make the exemption
increase effective for assessments in 2005. Current reports indicate
that over 250,000 signatures have been obtained. This is over half
the amount necessary to get on the ballot. The campaign has
involved television and radio ads and includes an email and internet
petition campaign.
Issues and impacts
. Would have a $614Mimpact on county levies and a $1.9 B
impact on counties, school boards and municipalities.
. Would result in 28 counties at 10 mills - Including Alachua,
Clay, Escambia, Hernando, Highlands, and Pasco.
o These six medium counties would lose $12.9 M that could
not be made up by increased millage due to ten mill cap
. 22 of the 31 small counties would be at ten mills - as opposed
to 15 today.
o Those 15 counties at ten mills today would lose $11.8 M
,. due ,to increase in homestead. ,. . ,-
o The seven additional small counties pushed to ten mills
would lose $8.3 M that could not be made up by
increased millage due to ten mill cap
. Anther twelve counties would be at eight mills or above -
Including Citrus, Hillsborough, Leon, Manatee, Polk, and St.
Lucie.
. The additional $25,000 homestead exemption for low income
senior citizens would be on top of the $50,000 homestead
exemption - as would the $5000 partially disabled veterans
exemption. This could result in a total homestead exemption of
$80,000 for certain individuals.
...--..-----
~ [~~~n\v7[â ~
d . MAY 0 6 i'00'13
, I
CO. ADMIN. OFFICE
Estimate of Impact for Additional $25,000 Homestead Exemption
HB1603
Additional $25,000 Homestead Exemption
County Government Operating
Millage Required to
~te Current Revenues
, -;C".c-,< :.,,"
:,.'\,.
.'.". 'z·.:,,··:·%~;: ....
8.' 35
6,6715
5,8272
6.4720
3.6315
8.4225
4,7343
9.2576
5.5867
6,5131
4.8871
'/:,\l
Impact of Increase Increase in County Current County
additional Homestead Operating Millage Government
CO"ntv t on CO"ntt 0 or,ting ~\ R'9uirod to Offset \ 0 'rotln MiII,ge
~'.'
..,"
".,.-~~';'
:,1 J;g7 . ì 5,6620
-c::····;,.:T
','
D
t) iWAI
...'.., ,'" ~:-" ""'\~':'
CH ~LC I'E
U~
'~::;f .\:. ;'"
r; <:<?C ¡:; 4.' 344
i"I' n 3; 6. )65
,'..:; 1.<,..··.·.' .j~rl -'17:7\ ,'. :,":"'~ i"I ¡:., i i·,:',\,. .:.', )',' ,:',', ....
;:;? 579' 4.~
=I~¡ .~
-~
,;:, ~ '4: 8
.l i1 ): 5: 000
'7 0, ~i 5.2000
¡-li::R
>E:;OTO
-'.'.
". ,,: ,:,;...
nll\nl
: :'...:~::";.;,, -:="
'::,.,1:\\:';:<'
'¡ ¡::þ
I.»
GULF
.~HhXJIj1Jl8¡¡QN: >;j 1':
HARDEE
_HENDRY
. ':ii:, "'...., I
"
-':;.
III c,:¡::¡
.',
,
..
$72
$1,110,361
o.~ 1C ;6
'599: 8.7500
_~805~ _..~9.0000
...,..,;....,
,~ r7 .'
-- :
$411,816
:.
$41.92
fr V
',C' :,; ·"':.C. . :, ,'" ,.,. "
$3,015,679 dl>'II; ~;..:;~
.. .~,'. $9,287,725 ,', 1.0532 ' 5,9170 :,::; i'ø\;:n-:'(-}?:
$16,512,300 0.4118 5,3401
.....\ilRÎli:8. ~
$13,310,251 0.7896 7,7089
$9,664,633 1.2115 5.4600
$5,315,355 0.4322 5.3950
$60,153.321 0.5030 5.9690
$1,532.696 0.1077 3,5238
$3,019,809 0.7404 7.6821
$4,181,603 0.4843 4.2500
$1.340,262 1.2566 8,0010
$24,382,089 0.4~228 5.1639
$5,749,338 0.5 5.9945
$35,173,181 0.3871 4.5000
." ',C':'
" ~;:
::c I,.'.
A _
DN
',: ,:,~
,<,~,..
,,' .
"
.. '"
MARTIN
MIAMI-DADE
MONROE
NASSAU
OKALOOSA
OKEECHOBEE
ORANGE
OSCEOLA
PALM BEACH
-
Data Source: Revenue Estimating Conference
6.3027
.;'; "0.'"
)f
)Ç
..,>'.:.
I,M 13
II
;7
¡:¿
"
)94, ..
.<,,;
~~
9.8C
:"
..:
ï326-
4. i4
:',',
J¿
5.7519
r498
-
Estimate of Impact for Additional $25,000 Homestead Exemption
Count
Impact of Increase
additional Homestead
on Count 0 e
Increase in County
Operating Millage
Re uired to Offset
County Government Operating
Millage Required to
Generate Current Revenues
Data Source: Revenue Estimating Conference
Please Print Name as it Appears on Voter I.D. Card
CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT PETITION FORM
104,185-A person who knowingly signs a petition or petitions for a. candidate, a minor political party, or an issue
more than one time commits a misdemeanor of the first degree, punishable provided in s, 775.082 or s, 775,083,
I am a registered voter of Florida and hEireby petition the Secretary of State to
, place the foJ/owing amendment to the Florida Constitution on the bal/ot in the general election.
IS THIS A CHANGE OF ADDRESS FOR VOTER REGISTRATION? _ YES_ NO (in this county only)
Pd, Pol. Adv, by Families for Lower Property Taxes
Voter Registration
- or-
DATE OF BIRTH
..--.----.-
---------
SIGNATURE OF REGISTERED VOTER
DATE SIGNED
For Office Use Only:
Serial Number: 04-01
Date Approved:
01-08-04
DS-OE 19 (5/02)
-
.
..........~...:....... ....:. ....::.:..
81. Lucie County, Florida
Agenda
Friday, May 20, 2005
7 :30 a.m., Conference Room # 3
St. Lucie County Roger E. Poitras Administration Annex
Convene meeting
Roll Call, announcements
Minutes
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
_u8.
9.
10.
Reimbursement Update., ~
Iff 6 r)rI\ /
firP JJ
'7 LIP' I
V \
\ t¡\\
!
~~f) 1/
r~î µ)/
ffJ/ '
Hurricane Recovery Efforts.
Pods 1 & 2 (County Jail).
County Credit Rating.
Downtown Fort Pierce - Capital Projects.
A) Cost By Project
B) Funding Sources by Project.
C) Building Impact Fees.
Impact Fees.
I
Criminal Justice Study Update - Pretrial Services.
Facilities Space Study (RFP).
Sheriffs Budget Request for FY 2005-2006.
County's Budget 2005-2006.
Alternative Fuel.
Adjournment
Next CBC meeting: June 17,2005
(! ~ '"/ / J /Y I r /2 S L ~ ... . "c::, <-
/ð J¥> ."76&--L.-r-Jr:- fr /.5
C C-b?'^-. ~¡/?<oø" ~ /5~,J,::J
,~ ~ or-
/7 / ð-'
/'
1-6 ';-'P I
Â-Q.·/4,
ò¿c...-\.....~ I r
r/ 7r~
'-'
'WI
Draft
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: March 18, 2005
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jacquelene N. Burke, Ron Parrish, Toby Philp art, John Knapp, Debbie Hawley,
Edward Lounds, Troy Ingersoll, Patricia "Pat· Ferrick and Carl Hensley.
MEMBERS ABSENT Lillie Miller, William "Bill·Casey, Steven Messer and Linda Bartz.
OTHERS PRESENT: Faye Outlaw, Kristy Lilly, Sophia Holt and Doug Anderson.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
Doug stated staff had just received the final report on the SLC Criminal Justice System Assessment and he
would be making a couple of comments on this matter.
Carl pointed out that there are 2 vacancies in this committee and encouraged members to contact
Commissioner Lewis and/ or Ed Fry, if they have someone in mind to be appointed.
MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the February 18, 2005 meeting, Ed moved for approval
and Troy seconded the motion. AU members present voted in favor and the motion passed.
Appoint CBC member to the Court System Advisory Board
This Board was created at the request of the Public Safety Coordinating Council for the purpose of planning
future court needs within the county (for details, please refer to resolution number 01-194). They meet the
last Thursday of the month (when they agree it is necessary to do so) before the Public Safety Coordinating
Council meeting, at3:00 p.m. One of its requirements is representation from the Citizen's Budget Committee
(one appointee).
Debbie proposed to appoint Ron Parrish, since by virtue off his line of work, his abilities would be of
assistance to this board's purpose. Ron stated he could attend the meetings. There being no other
nominations, all members voted in favor to appoint Ron Parrish to the Court System Advisory Board.
Buda:et in Brief
Doug asked if the members had any further comments about this document, which had been brought to
this committee at the last meeting. He asked if they agreed it was ready to be distributed.
Members stated they believed it to be informative and velY well written, a great summalY that will give the
public a good overview of where the money goes to. They stressed the need to find ways to promote its
distribution out to the community.
Ron moved to approve the document and make sure it gets out to the pubUc, Pat seconded the
motion. AU members voted in favor and motion passed.
Hurricane Recovery Efforts
Faye handed out a sheet with the figures regarding the reimbursements for hurricane damages (it provides
a breakdown of the reimbursements the County has received to date) and briefly explained some details of
what these figures cover.
Staff is confident that the amounts they have to date as estimated damage are accurate and will not be
changing much from now on, with three big exceptions: Indian River Drive repair, the Civic Center (still to
be determined if it is total loss) and damages to the old courthouse. CBC members and staff discussed the
plan of action staff is following regarding these specific projects.
Ed inquired if staff has found a viable facility for "Special Needs·.
~
..""
Doug stated that although it has not been announced, staff has found a facility that could be retrofitted for
about $60,000. It's a school building.
Downtown Fort Pierce Buildin2: Projects
Doug pointed out the memo included in the packet, dated March 2, 2005, which contains the revised
construction dates and estimated costs of these projects. He highlighted the revisions to the projects, which
were also discussed at the last meeting (please refer to memo for details).
Article V, Revision 72:Utches
Doug referred to a letter in the agenda packet addressed to Ronald L. Book (he works as lobbyist for the
County) describing problems stafThas found regarding several matters, since "Article V, Revision 7" began
its implementation (July 1,2004). These issues are creating additional expenses to the County and need
to be addressed by State Government (Please refer to the agenda packet for more information).
SLC Criminal Justice System Assessment
Doug announced that the final report for this study will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners
at a special workshop on March 22, 2005, immediately following the board's regular meeting (tentatively
scheduled for 10:30 a.m" or earlier if the board meeting is over before that time). The report has made
recommendations for improvement to every branch of the system.
Doug encouraged the CBC members to attend the workshop, as the decisions to be made to implement it
will definitely have budget implications. The report will also be presented to the Public Safety Coordinating
Council at their next meeting.
Committee members and staff discussed some specifics in the report, such as the findings in the jail and
the court.
Doug believes the study has been a great investment, because since the study began, the jail population has
gone down a notable percentage and according to its recommendations it may not be necessary to open the
new pods (saving therefore operational expenses, and may imply some revenue if one is open for federal
inmates).
Members requested to be updated on this issue at the next meeting and stressed they would like to know
each of the agencies responses to the study's findings.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC regular meeting is scheduled to be held on Friday, April 15, 2005 at 7:30 a.m., in Conference
Room # 3 of the St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 8:40 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
Carl Hensley, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
March 18. 2005
H:\O SecretarylO OMBICBCIMin\0318wpd
page 2
'-r
...,
Draft
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: April 15, 2005
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:35 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Lillie Miller, Ron Parrish, Debbie Hawley, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick and Carl Hensley.
MEMBERS ABSENT Jacquelene N. Burke, Toby Philpart, William "Bill"Casey, John Knapp, Edward Lounds,
Troy Ingersoll, Steven Messer, Linda Bartz.
OTHERS PRESENT: Commissioner Hutchinson, Faye Outlaw, Ray Wazny, Jennifer Hill, Marie Gouin and
Doug Anderson.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
There was no quorum for this meeting (Currently there are 13 members - we require at least 7 for a
quorum). These minutes are for information purposes only. No Action could be taken on the issues
discussed.
MINUTES
Minutes were tabled for lack of quorum.
Hurricane Recovery EfTorts- Reimbursement
Faye handed out a sheet outlining the most recent information on this subject. She reported that, to date
the total amount reimbursed is $38,890,973 (In the end, we expect to receive a total of$107,897,324) and
the assessed damage to date is $123,662,203, of which the county will be liable for $15,764,983. The
County reserves are $8,400,000, therefore at the moment there is a shortfall of $7,364,983.
Although the amount reported for damage has increased since the last report and some change orders have
been issued to correct this (Indian River Dr.), it is expected that this new amount will remain very much the
same from now on.
CBC members expressed concern as to what will we do if we get hit by a hurricane again this year or the
coming.
Doug stated there will be no other choice than to adjust. He pointed out that hadn't it been for the cost to
repair Indian River Dr., our reserves would have covered the amount for which the county would have been
liable. Staff calculates it will take about 5 to6-years to replenish the Reserves Funds, but if another disaster
strikes, there will be nothing else to do but to adjust to the new circumstances. He also spoke of the
expected increase in property values for this year and that staffwill recommend for any excess to be applied
to the deficit caused by the hurricane and to begin replenishing the Reserves Funds.
Downtown Fort Pierce Buildinl: Projects
Staff is working on a presentation to the Local Government Sub-committee (composed of3 representatives
each for the county, the cities and the school board; a list of members can be made available by request),
explaining the situation with the impact fees and the position that the City of Port St. Lucie has taken
regarding this matter (they will stop collecting impact fees for the County starting on October 1, 2005; they
will only collect the portion that goes to the city and are planning on implementing their own impact fees,
which will drive the fees up). This situation directly affects the County's capital projects and staff will have
to find alternatives to the collection process and present them to the BOCC to establish a new policy.
The presentation explains what projects the Correctional Facilities and Public Buildings Impact Fees are
expected to fund and therefore are directly affected by this potential problem (For details, please refer to
Exhibit A).
~
t,J
As he made the presentation, Doug numbered the challenges we will be faced with in the near future, such
as allocating funding for a new jail (the current jail connot be expanded any further) and he also went over
the costs of each of the projects to be funded by impact fees (although these buildings are located in the
downtown Fort Piece area, the purpose they will serve affects the whole county, because they will
accommodate the court system personnel, which has a county-wide jurisdiction).
Committee members and staff discussed briefly the situation the City of Port St. Lucie has generated
regarding impact fees.
Buda:et in Brief
Marie stated it may not be possible to include the Budget in brief pamphlet in the Property Appraisers
millage rates notice or with the Tax Collector's bill ( If they agree to include it with their mail, they may have
to accept to also mail out information from all the other taxing authorities). Instead, copies will be
distributed at all the different county buildings (at the tellers' windows or front desks at places where the
public can access it, like the libraries, utilities office or the code enforcement office), publish it in the news
paper and post it in the County's web page.
SLC Criminal Justice System Assessment
The final report was presented to the Public Safety Coordinating Council (PSCC) at their last meeting, and
before staff begins the implementation of the action plan, we come to this committee for feedback and
recommendations to the PSCC as to how to proceed. Regrettably, no action could be taken at this meeting
for lack of quorum, but staff would like to bring back some of the different issues for which the study has
offered solutions to this committee (such as the GPS monitoring system and hiring a Criminal Justice
Coordinator) for their feedback, since each of the new programs to be implemented will affect the County's
budget.
Carl inquired what will be the priority for the implementing the action plan.
Doug stated the priorities may have to be moved around based on time and money constraints and,
certainly, it will take several years to implement all the changes.
The Port St. Lucie City Council has stated they want to have court offices in the Port St. Lucie (PSL) area.
Doug stated that, although they will definitely have to do so, because the space in Fort Pierce is maxed out,
they will still have to determine what the future needs will be, as well as the possible sites for construction.
Committee members and staff continued to discuss the situation of the jail overcrowding (if pod 2 should
be open) and the possibility of building a work farm for trustee inmates. Doug pointed out a letter from the
Institute for Law and Policy Planning (ILPP) where Dr. Kalmanoff states they don't recommend opening pod
2 until the action plan has had a chance to be implemented. Another alternative could be to open pod 2
only for federal or other counties' inmates, which would cover operation costs and generate some revenue
until we need it for this county's inmates.
Since there was no quorum to take action at this meeting, members present proposed staff could go back
through past CBC meetings minutes to verify if any decision had been made in regards to opening the
second pod and submitting that information for the BOCC's consideration. Staff will also bring back this
item to the next meeting.
FaciUties Space Study IRFP)
Because of our rapid growth, all the County's public buildings are maxed out or near to full capacity.
Therefore, staff sees the need to determine what the immediate and longer range needs for space will be.
One of the recommendations that came out of the Criminal Justice System Assessment was the need to
perform space needs study for the courts system and staff agrees this is necessalY also for all other county
operations.
Citizen Budget Conunittee Meeting
April 15. 2005
page 2
Doug stated he knows Martin county made a space study
recommend to the BOee to go for proposals. Depending
could be done in increments, by areas.
limited) in the year 2000 and staffwill
its cost, it could be made for all services or it
staff could
will offer.
Although some
go to the BOee
through the
account up or
CBe
sure to keep the
13% is the goal).
budgets request
recommended to the BOee.
of the recommendations and
cost of living and growth demands
NEXT MEETING
The next eBe
Room # 3 of the
jail pods, county
the
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 8:45 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secreta¡y
Citizen Budget Conmlittee Meeting
April ¡ 5. 2005
H:\O Secretary\O OMB\CBC\Min\0415,wpd
page 3
Impact Fees
Correctional Facilities
FY 2005...2007
FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007
Beginning Balance $1,663,356 $333,171 $707.816
Revenues (w/lnterest) 1,801,254 1,891,317 1,985,883
Less 5% of Est. Rev, 0 -94.566 -99.295
'~
Juvenile Dorm 1,056 0 0
Additional Bedding at Jail 5,014 0 0
Jail See, Sys,·Debt .. 262.374 262,374
\' .~~, ...
Pods (Downpay 2M; Cost 20,5M) 1,707,463 0 0
Pods· Debt Svc, (15M) 955,532 959,732 953,732
H·...·..H ......... ···_·_··_··___..····_·_._H...._ .__m....·H.H..··__._
Pods - Debt Svc, (3M) 200,000 200,000 200.000
Total 3,131.439 1.422.106 1,416,106
Balance $333,171 $707,816 $1,178,297
Exhibit A
1
·~
.....,
Impact Fees
Other Public Facilities FY 05-07
Beginning Balance
Revenues (w/lnterest)
less 5% of Est. Rev.
Expenses:
Admin Annex·Addition
FY 2005
==±==š-~:~:~:~;:"'"
°
FY 2006
.....m........................_
$1,452,511
1.194,604
-59,731
FY 2007
..............._...~.... ..-
$2,040,009
1.254,334
-62,717
S, Co, Office Bldg,
... m......_.._....._.._..__........_....._..._.__..._.._.....
Ctr.lPicos Rd, Bldg,
Jail Tent
Jail Retrofit Dorm A-1
152,160 0 0
...........--.......-...-..--..---............--.............--..............--...-..--..-...-.....--...-.-....-....-.......-
8.000 0 0
..........-....--..-.-.-.-....-......-.......--..-.-..-....--...----...........-....-..-........-....-.,.-...-.-..............--...--....--......-....
8,000 0 0
.......-..-...-....--..-...................--..............__...._._._....___..........._.._......_..._............._.......__._.__'_M_'"
30,796 0 0
........-.-.....-....-..--...
40,000 0 0
..".'._..,...~........_._..,...._._...~_.,_..._.._.........._._...~.,-
......... ...-.......--....,.-
.... ... ... -,...._-~~ ..... ...-."....--.....-........-.. ...~.-
COC Bldg,-Chiller Piping Inst. 70.453 0 0
.. .. ... _....."...~._...........__..." ._.........-..........-. .....--............. . ...-..
Jail Pods (Downpay $500,000) 500,000 0 °
-.--..--...-..--.. .............-.......--
COC Bldg, (Down pay 6,9M) 1.000,000 0 0
. -.. .,.-.-... ......._........_~_....-.... ..... --..... ..... '..,. - ..-...-....-. .. .....- ...- ......._.._._...~----.,,,_...-...~ ......,...,.....-........... ....... ..... . .. ..... ........... ..-
cae Bldg-Oebt Svc ($3,921 ,735) 248,875 547.375 550,875
............... _.....__~._ ........_._......._.........~..___....... .. .·...._·.~.........___m._...... .....~_..~..__...~_... .._ .............. .. ..__ ._._ ....._._...._ . _..._,__....._....... ........._........
Total Expenses 2.058.284 547,375 550,875
--.-----..--..----.--. --------.--------------
Ending Balance $1.452,511 2,040,009 2,680,751
Impact Fees
Other Public Facilities
FY 2008-2010
¡-------¡::y-200ã ,- ------F-Ÿ 2009
-~ginning Balance ! $2.680,751 $3.382.874
- -- 'm m __. m_m"'__m"'__ _.____ .m...__ _ -'-"1 m__m__________m... ...._m.___..__...__,._,______m._____
- -~_~y~,~~~~(.....!I~tE!r.E!~tt m mi____m1~~_~,!~~~~__ .. .._m____~~~~.?~~~~__
Less 5% of Est. Rev, -65.853 -69,146
Expenses:
c6¿"E!I;giD~bïs~~¡$3,921, 735) . r- ·549.075---------546:975---'--- -549:575-
.. T~ï~·ï·E~p~'~~~~·--···_-----"---,······[ '·---'-------549.075-----··---·'·--·····-·-546:975-'···-···----······-·'··549-.575j
-,
§~~i0~m~_~_I~n.~E!____m J $3.382,874 $4.149.656 $4,979.526
FY 2010
--
$4.149,656
m_m__m,._._.___.._.._
1,452.049
..._.._..._...~.._.._..._.~...... .
-72,603
2
\.f
...,
Clerk of Courts Building
Construction Time Frame
June 20, 2005 - Dec. 31,2006
Estimated Project Cost
$6,900,000
..w...·......·....··....·......·-··· .
.. .. ....................-................-...-............-.... ....--...........................-....... ...._......._.......,.-..~....._......._..._....
Funding Source - FEMA
155,357
-,_...............................
.........-....-..................
..........-...................-...--............-..---.
--......-...........-..-....--.....-.--....--.........-..... -..---
Down Payment - Other Facilities Impact Fees
1,000,000
......-.---......-..-.....................-.................................................... ..........-.......................... ........._.~.......... ...
.m............................ non ..........._.............._.................._...
2004 General Fund Transfer
900,000
.. ......_..ø_...... .._....... ........._~ ........._R_....__._...._._.......~ ._,..~,_.._..._.. ..........__. .. .....h._......._.....__....._.~_......R..'..........._._.h..._.._ ...__....._......-...._._..... _....._R.·......,.·_·.·_· R._.·..······
2004 Capital Budget - Fund 316 922,908
-----------..-.-.--.----------------.--------
Bond Proceeds -Paid by Other Public Facilities Impact
Fees
Sales Tax Bond Issues 2003
3,000,000
921.735
..-.-............_..........
.... ..........-..,...."..
.... ..........-..-.................. . ...............--..-............... .....
. ............-.-....-.........-......,...
$6,900,000
....... .__......._...._........ ....._...........h..~......· .. ...........-........-............-..
$10,922.000
Total
Revised Estimate
Monumental Staircase
Construction Time Frame
Aug. 01 2005 - June 7, 2006
Estimated Project Cost
$1,238,000
................._..H·...........·_·_..·
..__...._.._._.."......_......._..'_h_·.
..._.. ........._......_,....,. . ......·HH·'_·.·....··.....··_··__···_··_.....·..···__··_·
Funding Source - Bond Issue Being Paid by Other
Public Facilities Impact Fees
3
'w
..."
District Cooling
Construction Time Frame
June 21,2005 - Feb. 7, 2006
Estimated Project Cost
.. ... -............~.. .. ............- .. ....... ..--................._._..~._.....-..- .....................-.........-
$1.910.000
..............................-..............
Funding Source - Bond Issue Being Paid By Other
Public Facilities Impact Fees
Old Courthouse Renovation
4 New Courtrooms
Construction Time
Frame/Renovation
..............--.......-.--........-...-....- .................-.....--............
...._m......._._.__............_.._._..__..___..._........_......___..........._
August 1, 2005 - June 5, 2006
Construction4lme
F rame/Remove-Replace
.... ..-.-...-.-..............-.................-.-............_.........···_··....·h··.....
Estimated Project Cost
(If Facility Is Renovated)
...........-....-.....-...........--..........-.....
January 1, 2006 - July 1, 2007
m·····..··.._··_____..........·_·.........··...·_·............__...w...._.._.... .._........._. ......___...... .........._.......".
.-..-....................-......-....-.---..-.--..........-.....~._........................_-,_....-..........,..._...._.,.......--.......-..-...............-.........................--...-..-....--....-............--......-.......-..-.......
$4,546,875
Funding Source - Insurance, FEMA, And Revenue Source
To Be Determined
4
'-'
't,J
Midway Road Expansion
Zone 4 - Port St. Lucie Impact Fees Generate
Approximately $2,500,000 Per Year
.....--.--..............--...-.....-...-...................-............-..........................-.........-.-.-...............-.-..-......-...-..........................-.-......................---....-..-............-..............--......-................
As Of 9/30105 An Estimated $7,851,000 Will Remain In
This Account
.-.--...-.....-...--.....-...............-...-.. ...
.....-....-...-...-.....-..-...-....-.-..--..--.................._.~...._._._.........__..._..._....._.........._._....__.......-...... ..... .........
Staff Will Recommend That The Majority of These
Funds Be Applied Toward The $10,000,000 Midway
Road Widening Project From 25th Street To The
Turnpike Overpass
.............................................. ,_...... _.. ..........._......_........._...................... ......h................·........·.....-···....·....·..···....... --........ ..............
Downtown Parking Garage
Construction Time Frame Aug. 01, 2005 - Feb. 7, 2006
Estimated Project Cost $2,500,000
.... ._.._..~..........~. ......-.-....... --_......_..-....~......_...._..-......_...._.........._............... .~..~.......-. ... ..._-_.~............~-_.
........ ....._.~.......__...._.._.............._....
Funding Source - Fort Pierce CRA
5
'-'
...."
Agenda Item
#2
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
MEMORANDUM
05-48
FROM:
Douglas M. Anderson
DATE:
May 9, 2005
RE:
St. Lucie County Jail - New Pods 1 & 2
This is a follow-up to last month's Citizens' Budget Development Committee (Committee)
meeting whereby we discussed the openings of Pods 1 & 2 of the new jail construction.
At that time, the discussion centered around whether or not Pod 2 should be opened. The
three options are:
· Opened for Federal and other outside inmates only
· Not opened at all and not budgeted for
· Opened for County and outside inmates
The estimated annual operating costs for Pod 2 are $2,5t1, 113. Pod 1, when complete,
will have 256 beds, while Pod 2 will have 320 beds. Per Dr. Kalmanoff of the Institute for
Law and Policy Planning (ILPP) and the Sheriff, the jail has a current capacity level of 969.
The current capacity at the jail of 969 beds plus 256 beds in Pod 1 equal a capacity of
1,225.
We are now averaging approximately 1,150+1- inmates per day at the St. Lucie County Jail.
Last April, the average number of inmates was 1,157 (see attached).
The Committee requested minutes of previous meetings where they discussed the new jail
pods. Please find attached minutes from the following meetings:
November 15, 2002
January 17, 2003
February 21 ,2003
April 18, 2003
June 27, 2003
January 16, 2004
February 20,2004
March 19, 2004
April 16, 2004
June 18, 2004
July 2, 2004
These minutes reflect that no decision was made by the Committee on if and when Pod 2
should be opened.
~
..,,¡
Page 2
May 9, 2005
St. Lucie County Jail - Pods 1 & 2
Staff will be presenting at the next Budget Committee meeting, scheduled for May 20th,
additional information on the status of Pod 2 for the Committee's discussion and
consideration. We then plan on forwarding your recommendation to the Public Safety
Coordinating Council at their next meeting, scheduled for May 26th, which will then be
followed by a recommendation to the Board of County Commissioners.
The County staff, along with the Sheriff, as per the ILPP report, will begin investigating
construction of a 50-bed work farm on the existing jail property. Page 50 ofthe ILPP report
discusses the need for a minimum-security facility. This housing would cut back on the
population at the jail and these inmates would be used on County work crews.
Attached is a letter from Dr. Kalmanoff stating that additional jail space should not be
opened to County inmates until the Criminal Justice Action Plan has had a chance to be
implemented. This recommendation is for Pods 1 & 2.
Please contact me should you have any questions.
DMNab 05-48
c: Board of County Commissioners
Public Safety Coordinating Council
Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Faye Outlaw, Assistant County Administrator
Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney
Ken Mascara, Sheriff
Garry Wilson, Chief Deputy
Attachments
z
o
¡...¡
~
:s
¡;;;;¡
~
o
~
~
~
~
~
~
o
~
i¡;J
;;...
M
000
000
Ii) '11' M
~ ~ ~
M~
00
00
NN
000 0
000 0
N ~ 0 m
~ ~ ~
o
o
M
o 0
o 0
N "I:""
c
ø;
ï
o
Board of Directors
Alan Kalmanoff, JD, MSW, Ph.D.
Board President
Executive Director
Linda Guydcn, CP,t¡
Board Tr"a~urer
I 'jCl.' Pri;:.ridcnt. PnuJ¡:ntiall1!,mranr:r:
Shel1ey Bergum
Board Secretary
Dim/or. De,,! and ViJ,I¡'¡'¡J
Td"'OIIlmunitü/ÙmJ. II/t,
Robert Fun],
Rcured Gencra] Counsel
EqmlÍ Em!,loY11lmt
O/>¡~orli",ity CO!1lflliJ,";on
Dr, Blanche PearJm:m
R'Je:lrrb l'.ryrholrc~iJI
Candie" \V'ong. M.,D,. IvI.P,] I.. Ph.D,
J-Jea/Jh Smite< l"'lei/I',.h
[;r.iveniJ) oj'CaÙ/i".,lÌa. S.lII F/imàJ((J
Advisory Board Members
Bri:]tì'raughe::r
1 Jrplltv /1/1ol7lel (,'m""¡
Ca ti[àrnia V'pur/11Itn I ,!!1UJJÙ,
Alkn Bn:cJ
1{'lirrd 1 Jim/or
NIltimhlll n,f(itute '!,r CornctÙJnJ
1. Micbad Hn'm'111
,b'lr/ar)', Smilb.rnm;lIIlr.,;/i/utù)11
Sheldon Mcs~;\J~cr
Pn?fr.rJor~/ 1..11J' and Jo¡,Ù!l
Univcrril)' oj (.aÙjomia, Berla/r)
1(uth Km:hcn
Retired 1)il1','lol'
("J!f,(of'f'1i¡; l,)e/'oI'Inleut fJ/'(.om·r,:tirmy
Dr. J"limj Silbert
l'/.,:.ri.len/
I)d'Jf:":~' Str-r.e! r';'"oullt/clliol!
Dr. HayarJ Catron
Pr(J/t:.r.W,. ~/ l)uh!i~o _o-,l¡JminÙI'ô'llZ,1If
C;r.m,f/ U;aJhir:p.,M1i [¡nit/cn-it,..
Judllh I 1c1lrnJnn
AJ.lir/all/,b1r/al)
('ilia nf .\/,,,1a/ EdumlilJlI
Rehohili/"tiOll .l'emáJ
Nancy 1 :mac
°ro,iln.rporta¡Ùm! CfJRlmuni('f l)Lan"i~::
ILPP
2613 Hlu.EGASS AVENUE
BERKELEY, CA 94704
MAIN: 510,486.8352
FAX: 510.841.3710
WWW.ILPP.COM
PLANNERS@ILPP.COM
~
....J
April 7, 2005
~)I,I ¡rc,,·/0'/
r' Lt & Ltvv'/// 9'/
C· ~,.b ~/ b'
, (/,1/7
C. .{ . V c9
fí1Y}~~~ (1
r7r
Douglas M. Anderson
County Manager's Office
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, FL 34982
Dear Mr. Anderson:
You asked for some clarification of our recommendation to not occupy
additional jail space (currently in the flnal stages of being built). These
beds should not be opened to County inmates until the criminal justice
Action Plan has had a chance to be implemented.
This advisory is pretty much the norm, wherever these studies have been
done, and it is also an approach long recommended by the National
Institute of Correction's PONI program, and the Department of Justice's
Total Systems Assessment Approach.
As there are so many immediate and no-cost recommendations that will
reduce demand, it would be flnancially imprudent and a direct avoidance
of the widely subscribed to Action Plan, to simply occupy the new space
at this time. First, crowding should be quickly and easily reduced by
implementation.
For example, if the Sheriff immediately began issuing field and jail
citations and the Public Defender met with all their clients immediately, as
is clearly best-practice, both agencies would save on internal efficiencies
and immediately lower jail demand significandy. If the Public Defender
supported bail and OR (own recognizance) motions (even with the use of
the current lawyer at the jail), it's likely the County would be down several
hundred beds before new ones could even be occupied. Establishing the
most basic OR program would further drastically reduce crowding right
away.
These are relatively free and quickly implemented recommendations and
they represent very few; there are dozens of other recommendations that
deserve a chance _ a chance that is much more unlikely if capacity is
suddenly expanded at the moment the recommendations are pending and
have the most potential to be effective.
Sincerely,
Alan Killmanoff
Executive Director
Institute for Law and Policy Planning
"-'
,.",¡
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: November 15, 2002
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Kenny Hogan, Ron Parrish, Mark Taynton, Paul Young, William "BilI"Casey, Marshall
"Buck" Miller, Debbie Hawley and Pat Ferrick, Carl Hensley and Linda Bartz.
MEMBERS ABSENT: David F, Samuel, Edward Lounds, Sylvie Kramer and Steven Messer.
OTHERS PRESENT: Ray Wazny, Doug Anderson and Marie Gouin,
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti.
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Ed Lounds was absent (excused) and Kenny Hogan presided. He welcomed the newly appointed members (Ron
Parrish, Carl Hensley and Linda Bartz).
Doug mentioned that the tax exemption program to encourage business to settle in St. Lucie County and the Parks
Referendum were both approved at the November elections.
MEETING MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the October 2002 meeting, Buck Miller moved for approval and Debbie
Hawley seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and the motion passed,
Senior Tax ExemDtion
Discussion on this item comes from the previous meeting. Doug recalled what has been discussed and reminded the
members that the BOCC has to act on this matter in December 2002.
Doug also referred to the chart sent with the meeting packet which outlines the estimated impact to the County's budget
vs, benefit to senior tax payers and explained further some of the details. He also handed out once again a list of the
counties that have implemented the Senior Tax Exemption and copy of memo sent to the committee on July 18,2002
detailing the estimated impact.
Kenny stated he is of the opinion tax payers will complain if they don't get much ofa break, therefore he believes the
best way to have the least impact on the County's budget would be to make it phased out. That way tax payers would
know its coming and it would give the county some time to work it out.
Pat stated she has spoken to some low income senior citizens that would qualitY for the exemption and proposed that
maybe the exemption should start at $10,000 the first year (rather than $5,000) as the tax cut would only translate to,
about $50 if it starts just at $5,000, She is of the opinion that based on what she discussed with some of these senior,
citizens that would qualitY for the exemption, they can really put to use the little money the would save and just $50'
would not off set much the first year, other than balance out other expenses, like the extra $18 they will be paying
because of the recently approved Parks Referendum.
Bill stated he agreed with Kenny's proposition to phase it out. Nonetheless, it should start at $5,000, because it wil~
give tlle county some time to plan and prepare better for the impact. This way, tax payers will know that the following,
year tlley will get a bigger break and it will continue to increase for the next few years until it reaches to the $25,00q
level. He is of the opinion it would be a fair break for both sides, ; ,
'-'
...,¡
He stressed the fact that many senior citizens that would not qualify for the exemption wiIl still apply for it, just to
make sure they really don't qualify for it and this wiIl represent a big load of extra work for tlle Property Appraisers
personnel.
Paul stated his hart goes out to the needy, but tax payers are already getting other breaks and protections and he is of
the opinion that the implementation oftllis programs only generates a lot of extra costs and bureaucracy for tile county
with no true benefit (comparably) to the community. He doesn't agree it should be implemented.
Ron Parrish stated his concerns witII the impact to tile Fine & Forfeiture fund (moneys that go to expenses like safety),
but he stated he basically agrees with recommending approval of the exemption.
Bill moved to recommend to the BOCC to approve the Senior Tax Exemption, but to do it phased in and starting
with $5,000 the first year with increments of $5,000 every year until it reaches the maximum of $25,000 at the
fifth year of implementation. Pat seconded the motion. After voting, the motion passed 6 to 3 (Debbie, Paul and
Carl voted against recommending it).
Fine & Foñeiture Fund
Marie explained the chart sent out with tIle meeting packets and reported on the status. Staff and members discussed
the situation with this fund, which has a deficit.
Doug stressed that it's being closely monitored and staff is constantly reminding those that have expenses that come
out of this fund (e.g. Sheriff, Court Administration) what is the situation and this contributes to more conservative
spending.
Undersheriff Garry Wilson stated he also wanted to point out that the Sheriff is working hard towards mitigating the
deficit and it was unfortunate that last year the PHA increase came after the budget was in place,
Rock Road Jail Detention Center - Bud2et
Marie explained a chart she prepared regarding this matter (please see Nov./15/02 meeting packet), Staff and
committee members continued to discuss the matter of the expenses for this facility and problems like overcrowding
of the jail. StaffwiIl come back to the committee with an update on this matter as well as the F&F fund,
Port Development
Doug reported on the latest developments regarding this matter. Bonding for acquisition of the Port property was
approved ($15,000,000). Adoption of the Port Master Plan illliLlhe Comprehensive Plan was also approved, which
is a requirement for tile Florida Seaport Transportation Council to grant funding for developing the port and there are
two applications in for reimbursement (Acquisition of the Port and restoration of Taylor Creek).
Conversations with Mr. Bell continue. Don Root (Economic Development Council) has been working on putting
togetIler a deal Mr. Bell would agree to and, to this date, he has not been successful in closing a deal with Mr. Bell.
Conversations continue and, nevertheless, staff is going forward with the other aspects of the work involving
development of the port.
Three companies had responded to tile RFQ and two of those companies (one out of Germany and the other from
Wisconsin) formed a consortium and presented a response to the RFP. The third company didn't submit a proposal.
Staffis reviewing the proposal, which includes different aspects, There will be housing for about 60 yachts and a major
facility for maintenance for the yachts. To develop the commercial aspect, there is a company involved which
developed the Chicago Port.
Citizen Budget Conunittee Meeting
November 15. 2002
page 2
'-"
....J
Staffwill continue to give CBC updates on this matter at future meetings.
Buildin2 Permits oresentation
Dennis Grim, Code Compliance Manager/Building Official, gave the committee members an update on the Building
& Zoning Division's operations and a forecast of what is expected regarding new construction in the county for the
near future (please see Annex A for details).
Notes to the presentation:
The Building Division operations are funded through two sources: Fund 491 (Building Code Fund, which is an
enterprise fund) out of permit fees, and Fund 102 (Unincorporated Services Fund), moneys from Ad Valorem taxes
and other fees and fines.
Dennis reported the tremendous increase the building activity had this past year and pointed out that, for the month
of October (beginning of this Fiscal Year) we are already braking record (see chart),
Preoaration 5 vear Bud2et
Doug gave the CBC members an advance on what will be discussed at the next BOCC Strategic Planning Session (lan,
30,2003). He encouraged the committee members to feel free to contact staff with any kind of input they are willing
to give towards the 5 year forecast staff will be presenting to the Board at this workshop.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC meeting will be held on Friday, December 15,2002 at 7:30 a.m., in Conference Room # 3 of the S1.
Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex, Topics to be discussed will include update on the County Jail, Port
Development and the Five Year Budget and Kenny requested an update from staff on how the Blue Field Ranch project
is going.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 8:45 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
Ed Lounds, Chainnan
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
November 15,2002
H:\O SecretarylO OMBICBCIMinlMin02l11'15,wpd
page 3
'-'
...,/
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: January 17 2003
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: David F. Samuel, Deputy Chief Ron Parrish, Mark Taynton, William "BiII"Casey,
John Knapp, Edward Lounds, Sylvie Kramer, Steven Messer, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick, Carl Hensley, Linda
Bartz.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Kenny Hogan, Paul Young, Debbie Hawley.
OTHERS PRESENT: Vanessa Bessey, Doug Anderson and Marie Gouin.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti.
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Ed Lounds asked members to introduce themselves for everyone to be acquainted and he welcomed the
newly appointed members (Ron Parrish, Carl Hensley and Linda Bartz).
Committee reoraanization
Sylvie Kramer moved to nominate Kenny Hogan for the committee's Chairman, Mark Taynton
seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and the motion passed. Pat Ferrick
moved to nominate Bill Casey for Vice-chair Mark Taynton, seconded the motion. All members
present voted in favor and the motion passed.
MEETING MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the November 2002 meeting, Ron Parrish moved for
approval and Pat Ferrick seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and the motion
passed.
Port Development
Doug referred !º--the Strategic Planning Session scheduled for January 3D, 2003 (A five year forecast of the
County's operations and capital costs will be discussed) and handed out copy of the presentation that has
been prepared on the Port development for the Strategic Planing Session (for details, please see exhibit A).
Doug went over the latest developments on this matter and CBC members and staff reviewed the
presentation.
There is another project to be completed at the port area and the expenses are to be kept separate: the
dredging of Taylor Creek, to restore it to its original dept (12 to 14 ft.). Doug went over the costs of this
project.
Haskell Company was the only one that answered to the RFP forthe Port development project and staff and
members discussed the funding sources and costs of this project.
The Florida Department of Transportation had approved construction of a flyover into the Port area (over
Federal Highway #1). Representatives of FDOT met with County staff and went to the area where it would
be constructed and staff explained to the FDOT representatives a flyover is not needed at that intersection
for traffic flow and the project would take up too much space (7 acres). Staff requested the reallocation of
those funds to improve 2nd street.
~
...,
FDOT sent an e-mail to staff confirming that the County could make the request and have those funds
reallocated to 2nd. Street.
Members and staff were discussing the funding and Doug pointed out that Senator Pruitt has stated that if
the County has to resort to condemnation of the property regarding the negotiations with Mr. Bell, he will not
support FSTED funding. Doug stated he doesn't know if senator Pruitt could stop the funding and people
have asked him if there is an alternate plan to allocate those funds and, at this point, there isn't any for such
a large amount of money. Committee members and staff continued to discuss the details of how FSTED
funding works.
Committee members and staff continued to discuss the details of the public and private investment as well
as the progress on the negotiations with Mr. Bell. One of Mr. Bell's conditions to close the deal to sell his
property is to retain 15 acres out of the 67 that are being negotiated.
New Pod for Rock Road Jail Detention Center
A spreadsheet was handed out with building impact fees, broken down by how much will go to corrections
facilities and other buildings and committee members and staff reviewed the current situation regarding the
overcrowding of the jail, which have caused problems such as fights among inmates, putting a lot of stress
on the staff.
As the County 's population has grown, so has (inevitably) the jail population and subsequently the need for
a larger facility to accommodate current and future jail needs. Construction of a new pod to cover the current
needs (overcrowding) for jail space is feasible, if the Board of County Commissioners approves it, but there
is also the matter of the operating costs. Newly appointed Major Tighe has put together a budget of what
it would cost to operate a new pod to submit it to the Public Safety Coordinating Council's consideration.
Several issues have to be taken into account regarding the expansion, such as the juvenile population at the
jail, which is taking up a lot of space and needs to be kept separate from the rest of the inmates, and the fact
that since this county has such rapid growth, the possibility of overbuilding should be considered, in order
to minimize future costs.
CBC members and staff also discussed the matter of how promptly are court cases getting processed, to
move out those inmates that are awaiting trial and sentencing, and the Court Room expansion plan.
There was also discussion of the plans for construction of future County Administration facilities to keep up
with the county's rapid growth.
It was proposed that, since there is frequent discussion of the new buildings, maybe the CBC meetings could
be held at a different facility every time, to have the chance to know each of them. Staff agreed to look into
it.
Ed also asked about how the matter of medical costs at the jail is progressing. Doug gave the committee
members an update on this matter and stated staff continues to work with it and will keep them updated at
future meetings.
Discussion of the jail expansion matter will continue at the next CBC meeting.
Preparation 5 year Budøet
Doug reported on how much staff has worked to put together their presentations for the next BOCC Strategic
Planning Session (Jan. 30, 2003). He encouraged the committee members to attend.
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
January 17. 2003
page 2
'-"
'-'
Bluefield Ranch
At the previous meeting I members had requested an update on the Bluefield Ranch recreational site project.
Vanessa Bessey. Environmental Resources Manager handed out some information on this project and gave
an overview of how the project is advancing. This park is expected to be open to de public (dependant on
permitting form FSWMD of entrance road) by late 2003. It also needs to be re-zoned for recreational
vehicles to be allowed to camp, once its opened to the public.
New York Mèts aQreement
Doug gave an overview of the terms ofthe agreement negotiated with the Mets. Please see meeting packet
for details on the agreement (draft of the letter of intent), as well as the ideas to enhance the stadium (among
other things, a picnic berm may be constructed).
One cent tourist tax
Copy of memo from Doug Anderson to the BOCC regarding information on the estimated 1 Cent Tourist Tax
increased revenue that would go to tourism for tourist activities and projects generated by Dream Park South
and the new equestrian facility at the County Fairgrounds was handed out the committee members and staff
explained the many benefits this will bring to the County. .
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC meeting will be held on Friday, February 21, 2003 at 7:30 a.m.,at Rock Rd. Jail's Chapel.
Topic to be discussed will be constructions and operation costs of possible jail expansion.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 9:20 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
Ed Lounds, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
January 17, 2003
page 3
H:\O Secretary\O OMBICBCIMinIMin03\01'17wpd
'-"
...,,¡
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: February 21,2003
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:45 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: David F. Samuel, Kenny Hogan, Deputy Chief Ron Parrish, Mark Taynton, Paul
Young, William UBiII"Casey, John Knapp, Debbie Hawley, Edward Lounds, Sylvie
Kramer, Steven Messer, Patricia UPat" Ferrick, Carl Hensley, Linda Bartz.
MEMBERS ABSENT: None,
OTHERS PRESENT: Garry Wilson, Toby Long, Lee Tinker, Major Pat Tighe, Captain Pat Walsh, Lt. Willie Russ, Lt,
Jimmy York, Deputy Jim Mullins, Jeff Owens (Jail Chaplain), Tammy Schwab, Dorothy Shaw, Commissioner Bruhn,
Dorothy Belcher as well as several other members of the Public Safety Coordinating Council, Linette Trabulsy, Roger
Shinn, Paul Julin, Doug Anderson and Marie Gouin,
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti.
INVOCATION
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
Kenny Hogan welcomed the attendees, and thanked Sheriff Mascara, Major Tighe, Cap, Walsh and their staff for
hosting the CBC meeting at the County Jail's Chapel.
Kenny also thanked the CBC members for selecting him to be this year's CBC Chairman,
MEETING MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the January 17, 2002 meeting, Linda Bartz moved for approval
and Ron Parrish seconded the motion. All members voted in favor and the motion passed.
Request for New Jail Pod
Video-Presentation bv Sheriff Mascara
Doug Anderson introduced this presentation stating that foHhe past year, the Public Safety Coordinating Council has
been discussing the need to expand the county jail (The County's population has grown tremendously in the past few
years and, accordingly, so has the criminal population, causing a situation of overcrowding at the county jail), The
problem is expected to worsen, therefore, staff and the Sheriffs Office have been working on putting together a request
for the construction of one, possibly two new jail pods to cover the county's growing needs,
Doug stated that staff and the Sheriffs Office put together a presentation for the Citizen's Budget Committee to better
illustrate the situation and also invited the members of the Public Safety Coordinating Council, expecting that they can
all work together and come up with ideas and solutions to fund this expansion as well as the increase it will have on
the County Jail's annual operating costs.
The Sheriff proceeded to introduce his staff and give his presentation, which consisted of a five minute video of the Jail
facilities showing the main building and each ofthe pods it currently has and how they're laid out (Facilities are grouped
into ·V" shape). In the video, the attendants could see the overcrowding conditions, He stated that jail maintenance
takes about half of the Sheriffs budget.
One of the measures they are taking, to ease overcrowding, is moving the juveniles, For the last year they have only
housed an average of 8 juveniles at any given time and by law, they have to be kept separate from the adult population,
An engineer was called to come up with a design to recondition an area at a non-used trustee cafeteria, to convert it
into jail space, This will free up 24 beds for other inmates.
~
'ttttI
Current staffina of the Jail- Slide presentation bV Maior Pat Tiahe
Sheriff Mascara handed over the presentation to Major Tighe for this part of the orientation, For details please go to
Exhibit A,
Major Tighe showed some statistics to illustrate that a large amount of the inmate population have been incarcerated
for violent crimes (about 30% have been charged) and, therefore, have to be kept separate,
Reauest for Jail Expansion - Slide presentation bv Sheriff Mascara
The Sheriff continued to explain the reasons why another pod is required (for maximum security inmates) and showed
another slide presentation (please see exhibit B) ,
He stated that although the Sheriff's staff has been trying to come up with solutions to the overcrowding, considering
different ways to group the inmates, maintaining the proper level of security, they have exhausted any tactics that would
not require building an extension,
He reiterated that, almost 2/3 of the inmate population are violent criminals. they cannot be put together in a big
common area, because violent situations would come up and the staff would not be able to control them,
Discussion
The attendees expressed concern regarding the fact that the County's population is growing rapidly and building costs
are also increasing, According to the projections, in seven years the county jail will need to house over 1,400 inmates,
which is almost double of the current capacity,
They all agreed that to cover immediate needs, building one pod is imperative and no further discussion is needed on
that point; furthermore, they need to consider building a second pod in the very near future to keep up with the county's
growing needs.
CBC members and the rest of the attendees proceeded to discuss possible ways to fund the expansion (e,g. taxes,
impact fees), They discussed the Federal inmate program, and how it would benefit to house federal inmates (the
construction costs would be covered by federal funds and the operation costs would be less than the revenue received
for housing federal inmates (please see costs chart in exhibit B, page 7), Also, by the end of next year, half of the
second pod would be already occupied by county inmates,
Attendees continued to discuss this matter and agreed to bring it to the next meeting (staff will continue to provide
updates and other information) to try to find a expeditious solution to it.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC meeting has been cancelled. Instead, members have been invited to attend the next Public Safety
C-º.QJdinators Council meeting, which will be held on Thursday, March 20, 2003, The next regular CBC meeting will be
held on Friday, April 18, 2003 at 7:30 a,m" in Conference Room # 3 of the St. Lucie County Roger Poitras
Administration Annex, Topics to be discussed will include update on the County Jail Expansion costs/funding sources
and the County's FY2003-2004 Budget
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 9:00 a,m, and the attendants went on a tour of the jail facilities.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
Kenny Hogan, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
February 21. 2003
H:\O SecretarylO OMBICBCIMinIMin03\02'21, wpd
page 2
'-'
....;
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: April 18, 2003
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:45 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
David F. Samuel, Kenny Hogan, Ron Parrish, Mark Taynton, John
Knapp, William "Bill"Casey, Debbie Hawley, Edward Lounds, Sylvie
Kramer, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick, Carl Hensley, Linda Bartz.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Paul Young and Steven Messer.
OTHERS PRESENT: Sheriff Ken Mascara, Doug Anderson and Marie Gouin.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Candi Bellamy (sitting in for recording sec.) and Suzanne Antonetti
(Transcription).
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
There were no announcements. Additions to the agenda: discussion on proposal to acquire FPUA
water & sewer (Walmart Project) and Port Development update.
Note: ' Due to technical problems this meeting did not get recorded (taping devices
malfunctioned).
MEETING MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes forthe February 21 2002 meeting, Sylvie Kramer
moved for approval and Ed Lounds seconded the motion. All members voted in favor and
the motion passed.
Jail Expansion
Committee members and staff discussed latest calculations on building and maintenance costs
for two new pods (please see exhibit A, provided by Sheriff's office). Construction of the two pods
would be paid with impact fees (first pod) and by refunding 1994 Sales Tax bonds, refinancing at
a lower rate (second pod).
They also discussed the jail's medical costs and in what ways the Sheriff's office has Deen finding
ways to cut expenses in every area (e.g. they used inmate labor to repair beds from tent city).
Sheriff Mascara also talked about other proposed ways they could save expenses (e.g. in-jail
hospice services for inmates and retired doctors/dentist volunteering time and equipment).
Sheriff's Mascara stated that, overall in jail renovations, they saved approx. 3 million dollars in the
last 45 days.
\.f
"W!I
After discussion, the Citizen's Budget Committee members present unanimously approved to
recommend to the Safety Coordinating Council and the St. Lucie Board of County
Commissioners to go forward with construction of two new pods for the County Jail, at a
cost of $ 8,000,000 each.
Budaet for Fiscal Year 2003-2004
Staff notified the CBC members that the budget overview for the next Fiscal Year will be presented
to the BaCC on July 01, 2003 at 8:00 a.m. in Conference Room 101 and invited committee
members to attend.
Other Business
Fort Pierce Utilities Authoritv's proposal to sell utilitv systems to St. Lucie County
Staff handed out some backup information on this matter and CBe members and staff discussed
how it would affect projects in the county, such as the new Walmart facilities.
Port Development
Staff also gave an update on the latest developments regarding the purchase of Mr. Bell's
property at the Port area. BaCe will soon decide if they will go to condemnation of 52 of the 67
acres.
Impact of Sept. 11. 2001 attack on County's economy
Committee members expressed their concern regarding the impact that the terrorist attack could
have had on our tourism and volume of building permits requests. Staff and CBC members
discussed this issue and staff agreed to come back with more information at a later date. Tourist
Taxes and Building permit fees will be discussed at the next meeting.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC meeting will be held on Friday, June 27,2003 at 7:30 a.m., in Conference Room
# 3 of the St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex. Topics to be discussed will
include Revenue Funds, Tourist Development Tax, and building permit fees.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 8:43 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
Kenny Hogan, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
April 18, 2003
H:\O Secrelary\O OMBICBCIMinIMin03\04'18, wpd
page 2
~'
..,.;
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: June 27,2003
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:35 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Kenny Hogan, Ron Parrish, Mark Taynton, John Knapp, William "BiII"Casey, Debbie
Hawley, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick and Carl Hensley.
MEMBERS ABSENT: David F. Samuel, Paul Young, Edward Lounds, Sylvie Kramer, Steven Messer and
Linda Bartz.
OTHERS PRESENT: Dennis Grim, Doug Anderson and Gary Perdew
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA
There were no announcements nor additions to the agenda.
MEETING MINUTES
Kenny pointed out minutes read: Sylvie Kramer moved to approval of the minutes and seconded the motion.
Attendees stated Ed Lounds had seconded the motion. Staff took note of the correction,
There being no further corrections to the minutes for the April 18, 2003 meeting, Ron Parrish moved
for approval and Pat Ferrick seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and motion
passed.
Jail Expansion update
Doug stated the Safety Coordinating Council had met the day before, to discuss the latest developments on
this issue. At this moment, they have sent out a Request For Qualifications (RFQ) and a lot of inquiries have
come in (it will be due July 23, 2003).
Initially, staff's plan was to recommend selecting the most qualified firm and after that, to discuss price with
the firm selected, but tnestrategy changed to request a quote together with the RFQ from the-beginning, as
part of the initial selecting process, to know their cost estimate. The firms will be ranked taking price also
into consideration,
Doug spoke about the time frame for the first pod to be in operation (around November 2004) and startup
costs (salaries for correctional officers and other operational).
Chief COffectional Officer
On other matters, Doug also stated that the Florida State Law says that the BOCC shall appoint a Chief
Correctional Officer. The BOCC has the option of acting as the Chief Correctional Officer and delegate the
duties to the County Administrator or to appoint the County Sheriff. The Sf. Lucie County Sheriff has been
fulfilling the roll but has never been officially appointed. It has to be done through a Public Hearing and staff
has began the process to request for the Sheriff to be officially appointed as the Chief Correctional Officer.
This action will allow for the expenses (salaries & benefits) for all correctional officers to be charged to the
General Fund ($ 11 MM) instead of the Fine & Forfeiture Fund. The only thing that will change is this
additional funding source; the Sheriff's budget will remain the same.
CBC members and staff also discussed details of the design and construction of the pods.
\.f
't(¡¡¡f
Pat Ferrick moved for the CBC to recommend to the BOCC to appoint the St. Lucie County Sheriff
as the County's Chief Correctional Officer, and for the salary and benefits expenses to be paid out
of General Fund, instead of the Fine & Foñeiture Fund. Debbie Hawley seconded the motion. All
members present voted in favor and motion passed.
There were questions regarding how does the Community Redevelopment Areas (CRA) affect the funds that
would be necessary for construction of the new jail pods. Doug went over some of the aspects of how CRAs
affect tax revenue distribution
There has been a great increase in the property value in many areas of the two cities, the past year, but the
revenues difference has to go into CRA improvements (affecting County revenues) and none of this increase
in revenue can go to cover expenses generated by City and County government such as public safety
(police, fire). Staff has corresponded with the cities, arguing that some of these funds should go to cover
certain serVices.
Budaet for Fiscal Year 2003-2004
Doug advanced to the CBC members the presentation staff will be giving to the BOCC at the 2004 Budget
Workshop on July 1, 2003 (For details please refer to exhibit A).
Revenues
Doug referred to the information sent out with the meeting packet which contained a table showing the
County's yearly revenue (for more information, please refer to the packet).
Bond ratinas
Doug mentioned the County recently went out for bond rating and had just got the results from Standard &
Poor's, which was A+ (better than Fort Pierce & Port St. Lucie). Staff is very pleased with this because it
means we are financially strong. The only aspect that brought the rating somewhat down was the fact that
we need to have more commercial development, and staff is working towards that goal. Doug is of the
opinion the County's will achieve a AA rating in about two years.
Buildina permits
Per the request CBC members had made at the prior meeting, Dennis Grim, the County's Building Official
and Code Compliance Manager, gave the committee an update of the situation regarding building permits
(for details please refer to exhibit B).
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC meeting will be held on Friday, July 18,2003 at 7:30 a.m., in Conference Room # 3 of the St.
Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex. Topics to be discussed will include Budget FY2003-2004
and North County utilities.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 9:00 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
Kenny Hogan, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
June 27. 2003
H:ID Secretary\!) OMBICBCIMinIMinD3\06'27,wpd
page 2
'-'
...."
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: January 16, 2004
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: David F. Samuel, Kenny Hogan, Mark Taynton, Ron Parrish, Paul Young, Debbie
Hawley, John Knapp, Ed Lounds, Troy Ingersoll, Carl Hensley, Steven Messer and
Linda Bartz.
MEMBERS ABSENT: William "Bill"Casey, Sylvie Kramer and Patricia "Pat" Ferrick,
OTHERS PRESENT: Pete Keogh, Toby Long, Dennis Murphy, Jennifer Hill, Doug Anderson and Marie
Gouin.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
BOCC's Strateaic Plannina Session
Doug stated this year the Board of County Commissioners' Strategic Planning Session will be on February
19, 2004 at The Panther Woods Country Club (9425 Meadowood Drive) and will start at 8:00 a.m.
The speakers will be motivational speaker Dan Thurmon and Dr. Lance deHaven-Smith. Dr. deHaven-
Smith is professor at Florida State University, author of several books, has written and conducted research
on a wide range of topics, has led retreats, workshops, and assemblies for many communities and units of
government and also directed St. Lucie County staff in the mid-1990's in the development of the Investment
for the Future Program.
Doug gave a brief description of the agenda. Marie added that one of the objectives is to determine and
develop the "vision" of St. Lucie County and she encouraged the CBC members to come to the meeting with
suggestions, as well as ideas for the needs of our community.
MEETING MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the December 19, 2003 meeting, Troy moved for
approval and Ron seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and the motion passed.
Committee reoraanization
Chairperson Kenny stated it had been a pleasure to serve as the CBC's chairperson for 2003 and
nominated Bill Casey for Chairman for 2004, David Samuel seconded the motion. All members
present voted in favor and the motion passed.
Vice-chair Debbie Hawley moved to nominate Carl Hensley for Vice-chair. He declined, due to his class
schedule, which may be in conflict with the meetings at times. Kenny moved to nominate Mark Taynton,
but he also declined for work related reasons. Kenny nominated John Knapp, Ron seconded the
motion. All members present voted in favor and the motion passed.
In Bill Casey's absence, John Knapp presided the rest of the meeting.
'-'
...,
Additional personnel for Parks and Recreation
Jennifer Hill, (Principal Budget Analyst, OMB) explained that three position requests (2 part time and 1 full
time temporary for Aquatics) for Parks and Recreation had been omitted by error at the last CBC meeting.
Pete Keogh stated these positions are required to cover tasks at the open space swimming pool that will be
built. He explained this is part of the program to teach as many children to swim as possible, in an effort to
lower the alarming statistics of children drowning in the State of Florida.
Ed commended Pete and his staff for the work being done on this matter, for as he stated, any work done
to reduce the number of drowned children is well spent.
Status on County's Funds
Marie explained the tables provided with the meeting's packet, which show the forecast for next 5 years
budgets of the County's major funds.
Committee members and staff discussed different aspects of each of these funds, such as the status of the
General Fund, expenses out of the Fine & Forfeiture Fund (mostly Sheriff's Office expenses) and problems
with the Unincorporated Services Fund (insufficient funds to cover costs of the services the County
provides).
Research Park
Doug stated staff will be recommending to the BOCC to build a Research Park near to the USDA (Picos Rd.
and Rock Rd. area). He stated that in order to build a Research Park, truly certified by the State, it is
necessary to set up a research authority (University) which has to be camped at the premises.
Staff has met with the University of Florida, which has agreed to be sponsor and Senator Pruitt, who is
extremely supportive of this project and will work towards getting the funding for the buildings, if the County
can get the right property for it.
Doug explained some of the steps staff has taken towards obtaining a suitable piece of property. He stated
the County is also interested in purchasing a property owned by Harbor Branch Institute (96 acres), South
of the Fairgrounds.
He explained several aspects of the purchase of these properties and the future use they will have by the
University and the Fairgrounds, as well as the revenues they will potentially bring to the County.
He also mentioned other revenues, such as future funds granted from the federal government, Tropicana's
interest to expand within the County and to purchase gas from the St. Lucie County's Landfill for their boilers
and how all these different sources of revenue combined are expected to cover the cost of building the
Research Park.
CBC members and staff discussed the benefits of purchasing these properties, such as promoting more
healthy activities for our community's youth, raising the community's quality of life. They also discussed the
importance of the University of Florida expanding within the County and staying in this area (University of
Florida representatives have stated that in order to them to stay in the area it is crucial to have space where
to expand to).
Mark expressed some concerns regarding the Landfill's operations and committee members and staff agreed
to invite the Landfill Manager to a future meeting to explain the Landfill's different sources of revenue and
in what ways they benefit the County.
John Knapp inquired if there is a Master Plan laid out for the purchase of the property intended for the
Research Park. Doug replied in the affirmative. Staff will continue to bring updates on this matter.
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
December 19, 2003
page 2
'--"
..,¡'
New Jail Pods
Toby Long reported on the actions the Sheriff's Office has taken to solve the overcrowding problems at the
County Jail.
Committee members and staff discussed otherjail expenses, such as inmate medical costs,laundry, kitchen,
etc. Ed requested staff to provide a calculation of the operations cost to the County per day, per inmate (cost
to the Sheriff's Office is roughly $48 per day, per inmate). Staff took note of his request and will provide this
information at a future meeting.
Doug also stated some of the measures taken to keep the inmate population within the allowed capacity,
such as creating a new position and hiring a public defender, stationed at the jail. This has accelerated the
processing of a lot of the pending cases and allows to send the inmates that are convicted to more than one
year to a state prison.
cac members and staff continued to discuss the urgency of this matter, and the fact that even after the new
pods are built, the jail will still operate at capacity by spring of 2006.
Unincorporated Services Fund
This fund has been presenting a challenge to staff, to keep it balanced. The revenues for this fund come
from municipal taxes from the Unincorporated Area.
Dennis Murphy (Community Development Director) explained that as the cities have annexed more and
more areas, the County has lost that revenue stream, but more often than not, much of the expenses
continue, due to the services that the County is obligated to provide to the residents.
He added that there is not much development within the Unincorporated Area (which means that the taxes
collected are from vacant land) and where there is, the revenue will not be going into the Tax Roll for another
2 to 3 years.
Marie stated that part of the revenues that come from Franchise Fees, which are collected in the
Unincorporated Area, have funded the Transportation Trust Fund and she is researching to see how she
could assign part of those revenues towards Community Development's operations.
Staff will continue to search for solutions to this situation and will keep CBC members updated on this matter.
Nettles Island
Carl Hensley had inquired why is it that this community doesn't pay impact fees.
Dennis Murphy explained this is because they have "an existing use". He gave an example: if a house was
built in 1970 (prior to the enactment of the Impact Fees Ordinances - early 1990s), it burns down in 2004
and the owner of the property rebuilds another single-familyñOuse (replacement), he does not pay impact
fees, as long as he builds for the same use. Impact fees can only be collected, if it is replaced by a building
that will have a different use (e.g. a duplex). This is the case of the properties in Nettles Island, because it
was determined by the BOCC (about 21/2 years back, after much discussion) that the conversion from the
trailers to little houses (permanent structures) does not constitute a different use, because the impact activity
is already there.
Staff and committee members discussed some aspects of this matter.
NEXT MEETING
Due to time constraints, the capital projects were tabled to a future meeting. The next CBC meeting will be
held on Friday, February 20, 2004 at 7:30 a.m., in Conference Room # 3 of the S1. Lucie County Roger
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
December 19, 2003
page 3
....,
....,
Poitras Administration Annex. Topics to be discussed will include review of topics to be discussed at the
BOCC Strategic Planning Session, capital projects and SLC Utilities.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 8:55 a.m.
Respectfully, submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
William "Bill" Casey, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
December 19, 2003 '
H:IO SecretarylO OMBICBC\MinIMin04101'16.wpd
page 4
'-'
...,
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMIITEE
Meeting Date: February 20,2004
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT:David F. Samuel, Mark Taynton, Ron Pattish, Paul Young, William
"Bill"Casey, Debbie Hawley, John Knapp, Ed Lounds, Sylvie Kramer, Troy
Ingersoll, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick and Carl Hensley.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Kenny Hogan, Steven Messer and Linda Bartz.
OTHERS PRESENT: Mike Bowers, Vanessa Bessey, Don West, Richard Bouchard, Pete Keogh,
Linda Brown, Ray Wazny, Paul Phillips, Leo Cordeiro, Debbie Scribner,
Jennifer Hill, Doug Anderson and Marie Gouin.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
Comments from City of Port St. Lucie's Man~er in newspapers
Doug handed out copy of an article published in the Palm Beach Post and pointed out a
paragraph which contained statements from the City Port St. Lucie's manager. The article
suggests the City of Port St. Lucie plans to "compete" with several counties (including St. Lucie
County) for spinoff companies of The Scripps Research Institute.
Doug assured committee members the County is not competing for spinoff companies form the
institute and stated he doesn't know from where Mr. Cooper got such information. Doug stated
staff is only working at the moment on the possibility of constructing the Research Park and is
in no way linked to attract spinoff companies form the Institute.
Doug continued to read parts of the article that states Mr. Cooper recommended that the city
council stop collecting impact fees for the County and instead establish the city's own impact fees
to schedule their capital needs.
Staff and committee members discussed the impact it would have on the County's Capital Budget
if the City of Port St. Lucie would go ahead with such an idea. CBC members and staff decided
to wait to see if the City pursues the idea in the future.
MEETING MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the January 16, 2004 meeting, David moved
for approval and Ron seconded the motion. AU members present voted in favor and the
motion passed.
SLC Utilities
Doug mentioned staff had sent, during the last two weeks, updates on the Board's actions
regarding the County's Utilities system.
~
"WI
He stated the BOCC instructed staff not to proceed with the expansion of the Holiday Pines plant,
as they came to realize it is not currently in the best interest of the community, but there are
plans to site, a new regional wastewater treatment plant facility in the future. He gave a few
details of the plans for this new project (estimated to cost approximately $60MM).
Doug went over different aspects of the utilities agreement with FPUA, and staff and committee
members discussed the boundaries of the utilities systems as well as how it will benefit the
community. Doug also explained the terms of the agreement in regards of how it will affect
certain areas, such as Indian River Estates (they will be requested to vote on how they want their
service) and how this agreement will allow for utilities rates to lower.
CBC members and staff also discussed in what way future areas of growth, such as Midway Rd.
will be affected and what are the plans to provide service to those areas (e.g. we may expand the
Fairgrounds Water plant).
For details of the highlights of this agreement, please refer to the two sheets in the packet
handed out at the meeting and to exhibit A in these minutes (map showing the proposed utilities
coverage as approved by the BOCC on March 2, 2004). Staff is in the process of routing the
agreement to FPUA and the City of Fort Pierce for signatures.
Lincoln Park Community Center
Doug stated another positive news in relation to the County and the City of Fort Pierce is the fact
that, after conversations with concerned citizens, the County has agreed to open the Lincoln Park
Community Center on Saturday nights (estimated operations cost of the program for the first 6
months is approximately $14,000). For security reasons, it is necessary to assign four deputies
to patrol the area and the City offort Pierce has offered one police officer at their cost. Therefore,
only three sheriff officers will be required.
CBC members and staff discussed how the County and the City of Fort Pierce are working
together to solve the costs of security for the community.
Joint meetinl!: with the Cities
Bill Casey inquired what is the County doing to bring to the Cities' attention how much the
County is doing in those areas and the costs it generates.
Doug stated what has been done in regards to this matter and announced there is ajoint meeting
with both cities set up for-March 4th (at IRCC) to discuss county expenses. There are facilitators
invited to participate. Doug also stated the County has spent over $30MM in the City ofYort St.
Lucie area and over $20MM in the City of Fort Pierce area, in the course of the past several years,
in these partnerships.
Fort Pierce annexation 1JolicV
Doug also stated the City of Fort Pierce will not be annexing outside their utilities services area.
The City Commission has taken off the table pursuing annexation of the Airport for now and
Commissioner Bob Benton has stated publicly, he will not support annexation of the Airport as
long as he is in office. Also, the City will not authorize annexation of the Airport until it meets
State law requirements for annexation (contiguous and compact service).
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
February 20. 2004
page 2
'-'
...,
Committee members inquired if the utilities area coverage marked in the agreement means that
they will be annexed to the City of Fort Pierce. Doug stated in the affirmative (it will happen
eventually), but that this process is gradual and may take 20 to 30 years.
Request for an addition Assistant County Administrator position
As discussions on the utilities agreement continued Troy proposed staff should have somebody
to attend meetings, such as planning.
Doug stated that staff realizes the importance of having somebody representing the County at
these meetings, but for time constraints, they are not able to cover all of them. For this reason
staff is considering, requesting to the BOCC to approve an additional Assistant County
Administrator to coordinate with the Cities in all their developing plans, so that the growth in the
whole community would be more harmonized.
CBC members also discussed the importance of other entities, such as the Sheriff, the Fire
District and the School Board participating at meetings like the Planing and Zoning Committee
(being careful not to drag simplified issues unnecessarily), so that their input can be heard to
avoid further development problems in the future.
Landfill Fundinl!:
Leo Cordeiro, SLC Solid Waste Manager, explained handout sheet which lists the Landfill's
different sources of revenue, including recycling of scrap. He also spoke briefly of the plans to sell
methane gas to Tropicana.
Leo stated the Landf1l1 has come a long way in the past eleven years. At that time, it was
estimated that it would close by the year 2008. Today the estimated life is of another 30 years
(even taking into account the recent tremendous growth of the area) and once the construction
demolition recycling facility the County is in the process of building begins its operation, there
will be mining of sections that were already closed and may increase its life-span to 60 years.
Doug offered committee members that staff could host the next CBC meeting at the Landfill, to
give a tour ofthe facility at the end of the meeting. CBC members agreed. A map is provided in
these minutes packet. If you have any questions, please contact us at 462-1670.
CBC members and staff also discussed other aspects of the operation, such as Florida Recycling
(auditing of their collection fees and the quality of their seIVice).
Beach re-nourishment
Richard Bouchard was invited to the meeting to explain the Beach Erosion Program and the cuts
the State has made to the budget (generating a$750,00 shortfall). He explained the most recent
events and explained reasons why its necessary to replenish the beaches at Fort Pierce. He
spoke about how it benefits the tourism (enhances the beaches ), the environmental aspects
(such as protection to the sea turtle population) and storm damage protection (from Hurricanes).
Mark inquired what is the time frame to begin the re-nourishment this year and Richard stated
they are constrained to be done by end of May, for environmental reasons; therefore the need to
take care of this situation is imminent.
Citizen Budget C0ßU11ittee Meeting
February 20, 2004
page 3
~
'~
Purchase of Properties
Doug referred to letter from the County's financial advisor with his opinion on the County's
capability to borrow for the purchase of the shrimp property ($3MM) and a property for the
Research and Education Park ($IOMM). For details please refer to copy provided to CBC
members at the meeting.
Committee members and staff discussed some details of the possibility to purchase such
properties.
St. Lucie County JaU - New Pods
At the previous meeting committee members had requested to know what is the cost per inmate,
per day to the County. Bill Casey mentioned the sheet provided at the meeting with the
information and inquired about the Federal Inmate Program.
Ed requested information on the Time frame to begin construction. He stated he is worried the
longer it takes to begin their operation, the more expensive it will become and the more problems
it will generate for the Sheriff to keep up with its operations budget or benefit from the Federal
Inmate Program.
Doug gave committee members an update on the costs and where we stand on the time frame
to begin construction. Staff will provide additional information to committee members as soon
as possible.
NEXT MEETING
Due to time constraints, the Capital Projects were once again tabled to a future meeting. The
next CBC meeting will be held on Friday, March 19,2004 at 7:30 a.m., at the SLC Landfill.
Topics to be discussed will include update on the joint meeting with the cities, status on
construction of the j ail pods and a tour of the SLC Landfùl.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 9:05 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
William "Bill" Casey, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
February 20. 2004
H:\O SecretarylO OMBICBCIMinIMin04102'20,wpd
page 4
'-'
'--'
...,
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITIEE
Meeting Date: March 19, 2004
SLC Landfill's Conf. Room
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: David F. Samuel, Kenny Hogan, Ron Parrish, William "Bill"Casey, John Knapp,
Debbie Hawley, Edward Lounds, Steven Messer, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick, Troy
Ingersoll, Carl Hensley, Linda Bartz.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Taynton, Paul Young and Sylvie Kramer.
OTHERS PRESENT: Roger Shinn, Ed Parker, Barbara Churchill, Don West, Ray Wazny, Jennifer Hill,
Doug Anderson and Marie Gouin.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
Please notice below, some items discussed were not in the original agenda: SLC Utilities,
Research Park and Methane Gas from Landfill.
MEETING MINUTES
Ron pointed out that under the tittle "Fort Pierce annexation policy" the minutes, should read:
"The City Commission has taken off the table pursuing annexation...". Staff took note of the
corrections.
There being no further corrections to the minutes for the February 20, 2004 meeting, David
moved for approval and Linda seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and
the motion passed.
SLC Utilities
John Knapp inquired about Exhibit A (map) included in March meeting's minutes, which shows
Fort Pierce Utilities Au thority's proposed service area, according to the Inter-local Agreement with
the County.
Doug briefly explained what each of the colored areas mean and proposed that staff can bring at
the next meeting a detailed map of the County's water and sewer lines, which isalmost finalized,
for their review. This map will also show the estimated cost of each area (Overall, the estimated
cost of the first phase of the project is approximately $ISMM).
CBC members and staff discussed some of the details in the map and agreed to bring back this
subject to the next meeting, for further discussion.
Research Education Park
Doug stated staffwill request BaCC authorization to get a $1 OMM line of credit to purchase land
for this project. A contract has been signed with property owners, contingent on financing.
Committee members and staff discussed details of the purchase of the properties available, as
well as financing, agencies and institutes interested in participating, the support of State
representatives, etc.
-....,.
\J
...,
Methane Gas from the SLC Landfill
Tropicana has expressed interest in buying methane gas produced by the SLC Landfill. They had
proposed a 45 years commitment, but County Attorney's office does not recommend having a
commitment for such a long period of time (they recommend 20 years). Staff is still working on
the details of this issue and will come back to this committee with an update.
Joint Meetin2 with the Cities
There is a task force being established to work with the School District to finance their future
construction projects. Councilman Jack Kelly (City Port St. Lucie) is heading it and have asked
for Commissioner Barnes (District V) to represent the County (he is out of town and, as to the
date of this meeting, we do not have an answer as to if he will accept).
CBC members and staff discussed the importance of the funding for schools.
JaU Pods Constmction
The original cost of construction of this project was estimated at approximately $16MM, but due
to the price of steel increasing dramatically in these recent months, the new estimated cost is
closer to $18MM, because of the amount of steel required for this kind of building (e.g. structural
reinforcements and details like cell bars and doors).
CBC members and staff discussed aspects of this matter, such as what is being done to prevent
other contingencies this project could bring, as well as future expansions to the jail.
Doug also commended the outstanding work Chief Judge Angelos and the other judges have been
doing to process the pending cases promptly and efficiently, to keep the capacity of jail
population under the maximum allowed by federal requirements.
5 Year Capital Plan
Staff provided copies to CBC members ofthe lists of Capital Projects and Doug pointed out the
amounts budgeted for this Fiscal Year by department and encouraged committee members to
review it and come back with their comments and ideas, which are always very useful to staff.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC meeting will be held on Friday, Apri116, 2004 at 7:30 a.m., in Conference Room
# 3 of the St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex. Topics to be discussed will
include details of the SLC Utilities System.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 8:20 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
March 19.2004
H:\O SecretarylO OMBICBC\Min\Min04103'19.wpd
page 2
'-"
'-"
.....,
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: Aprn 16, 2004
Conference Room '* 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: David F. Samuel, Mark Taynton, William "Bill-Casey, John Knapp, Debbie Hawley,
Edward Lounds, Sylvie Kramer, Patricia "Pat- Ferrick, Troy Ingersoll, Carl Hensley,
Linda Bartz.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Kenny Hogan, Ron Parrish, Paul Young, and Steven Messer.
OTHERS PRESENT: William W Ritchie, Ken Mascara, Patrick Tighe, Toby Long, Thomas Willis, Lisa
Savage, Howard Osterman, Mike Bowers, Jennifer Hill, Ray Wazny, Doug
Anderson and Marie Gouin.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
Addition - New Cost of County Jail Pods
Bill Casey welcomed members of the Public Safety Coordinating Council, who were invited to attend this
meeting to discuss the current estimated cost to build the two new jail pods.
MEETING MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the March 19, 2004 meeting, David moved for approval
and John Knapp seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and the motion passed.
SLC Jail - Cost of New Pods
Doug explained staff had invited the Pu blic Safety Coord. Council (PSCC) to join this meeting because the
building firm quoted a price for completion of the project and they can only hold the offer until May 1,2004
to lock the quoted price. Staff will recommend approval at the next BOCC meeting and the PSCC is not
scheduled to meet until after the BOCC meeting. Staff is seeking the CBC and PSCC's endorsement on
moving forward with the project and accepting the new price.
Roger Shinn, Central Services Director stated the Jail Expansion Selection Committee has been negotiating
with the recommended design build firm (Centex Rooney/Schenkel Shultz) to come back to the BOCC with
a reasonable cost to build the two new pods for the jail. These two pods would have a capacity for 576 beds
to house medium and maximum security inmates and the design is focused on minimizing the operation
and maintenance costs. The vendor came back earlier this week with a guarantied fixed price of
approximately $18.955MM, locked until May 1,2004 (increase in cost is due to steel prices escalating).
Doug added that the estimated total cost for the project is $20.5MM (this includes construction cost
$18,955,000, impact fees $388,000, estimated wetland mitigation $240,000, County's consultant $346,000
and contingency for changes initiated only by the County $571,000). The entire project is to be paid out of
revenue from impact fees (Public Facilities and Corrections). He explained the financing aspects.
CBC members and staff also discussed City of Port St. Lucie's Council comments on considering not to
collect impact fees for the County in the future. Staff has scheduled a meeting with the cities to discuss
impact fees and will come back to CBC members with an update on this issue at a future meeting. Pat also
suggested the SherifI's Dept. staff should bring to the meeting with the cities, population projections (County
residents and jail inmates) to explain why it is so important to the community as a whole to collect the
impact fees.
CBC members inquired about other aspects of the project, such as the urgency to complete the project
(despite the court's efforts to process the cases expeditiously, its getting harder to keep the jail population
within its current maximum capacity, due to St Lucie County's sudden population growth), the time frame
for completion (if the contract is awarded as proposed to the BOCC, the design build firm can begin work
in August of this year and the expansion would be in operation by May 2005) and the immediate need for
an additional new facility (staff is also working on this issue).
....,
....,
'+tJ
Other aspects discussed included roll of the consultant, Sheriff's Dept. involvement/feedback, following the
proper specifications, contingency plans and alternatives for confining (or monitoring) the inmates.
Ed moved to endorse staff's recommendation to go forward with construction of the two Jan pods
and accept the vendor's quote, for it is of this committee's opinion that for the reasons stated before
it is imperative to begin construction as soon as possible. Mark seconded the motion. AU members
present voted in favor and motion passed. (For the record, it is here stated that the PSCC members
present concurred with this committee's recommendation). '
SLC Utilities
Mike Bowers, Interim Utilities Director and Howard Osterman, utilities consultant, gave a presentation on
the agreement the County made with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority and on the County's water utilities
expansion master plan (for details on the expansion plans, please refer to the packet handed out at the
meeting, which contains maps of the areas that will be covered and its costs).
Committee members discussed details of the operations and selVice area of the proposed utilities system
expansion. They also discussed the investment, costs, revenues and benefit to the community.
Ed moved to endorse in concept the utility expansion master plan for the North County area as weU
as the movement towards Midway and Okeechobee roads area (phase 1) contingent that staff comes
back with updates on the specific plan once it is available. John Knapp seconded the motion. AU
members present voted in favor and motion pned.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC meeting will be held on Friday, May 21,2004 at 7:30 a.m., at the SLC Fairgrounds, located
at 15601 W. Midway Rd. in Fort Pierce. Topics to be discussed will include an update on the process of next
fiscal year's budget and the city of Port St. Lucie's position regarding collection of impact fees.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 9:05 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
William "Bill" Casey, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
April 16. 2004
H:\O SecrelarylO OMB\CBCIMinIMin04\04'16.wpd
page 2
'-'
'-'
.....,I
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: June 18, 2004
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Kenny Hogan, Mark Taynton, William "Bill·Casey, John Knapp, Edward Lounds,
Sylvie Kramer, Steven Messer, Patricia ·Pat'" Ferrick, Troy Ingersol1, Carl Hensley,
Linda Bartz.
MEMBERS ABSENT: David F, Samuel, Debbie Hawley, Ron Parrish, Paul Young.
OTHERS PRESENT: Roger Shinn, Ethel Rowland, Jennifer Hill, Doug Anderson and Marie Gouin.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
Doug stated that in regards to the discussions about the jail overcrowding, it is necessary to hold a meeting
prior to the next regularly scheduled CBC meeting, due to the urgency to resolve this matter and requested
that if possible, they meet on July 2, 2004.
MEETING MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the May 21, 2004 meeting, Kenny moved for approval
and John Knapp seconded the motion. An members present voted in favor and the motion passed.
Additional Homestead exemption
Doug explained the effect the "Proposed Constitutional Initiative Petition to Increase the Homestead
Exemption by $25,000" would have on the County's Tax Rol1. Should this additional $25,000 homestead
exemption be approved, an estimated of 3,184 properties would come off this County's Tax Roll. This
would affect the General, Fine & Forfeiture and Mosquito Control Funds and for the revenues to stay at the
level they are today, the millage rate would have to increase somewhere between 1.09 and 1.13, shifting the
property taxes to evelyone else in the community (including business).
He stated this represents a problem, not just for our County, but it may disrupt the whole State of Florida
(i.e. as far as he recalls, there are seven Counties in the State of Florida that are at their 10 mil cap and
would have to consolidate with other Counties, in order to cover the costs of public services).
Staff has prepared a draft (to be presented at the next BOCC meeting) resolution opposing the "Proposed
Constitutional Initiative Petition to Increase the Homestead Exemption by $25,000" and will recommend to
adopt this resolution (04-174). He requested CBC members' to support this recommendation.
Bill Casey asked what impact would the exemption have on the budget. Staff replied it would reduce future
Fiscal Year's revenues by approximately 11 MM/year and to compensate the loss, our County will also have
to increase the millage rate very close to the 10 mil cap.
Ed asked if there are any plans to start an information campaign to make the general public aware of the
impact the second homestead exemption would have on the quality of public seIVice.
Doug stated the Florida Association of counties will meet next week and are planing to launch a state-wide
campaign on this matter and he personally has been speaking before several local groups. He is of the
opinion that if the public is informed of the advantages and disadvantages, the majority will see there are
more disadvantages to approve the exemption.
Linette Trabulsy, the County's Pu blic Information Officer added that the feed back she has been getting from
the press is that they agree approval of the exemption would cause big problems to the whole State of
Florida and they have been writing stories and editorials to that effect.
'--'
\J
't"",
Committee members and staff discussed the impact of the exemption. Some members are of the opinion
that an educational campaign, although it's a worthy cause, will not change the minds of property owners
that expect to benefit with the exemption. Some members proposed to consider launching the educational
campaign and not state a position pro or con, since it may appear to the general public it is a bias position
from the County government as an ·interested party" that only wants to collect more taxes and ·spend it in
more bureaucracy". Other members disagreed and stated that as the Citizen's Budget Committee, and
having full knowledge that such a cut represents a blow to the County's budget that will harm the
community as a whole, they should state their position and clearly oppose it. Other members stated they
were not certain they opposed the exemption if it means it would shift the burden of taxes from the lower
income population to the commercial and industrial sectors.
Doug stated such a way of thinking hurts the County's capacity to attract businesses to settle here, as
Florida would be having one of the highest property tax rates in the Country, making this County less
competitive.
After lengthy discussion on this matter, Carl moved to support the resolution opposing the exemption. John
K. seconded the motion.
Some members opposed supporting the motion if it did not include to also vote to launch a campaign to
educate the public about the consequences approval of the additional exemption would have in the
community, in terms of the quality of public selvices and the impact on the economic development of this
area.
Carl stated he agrees it's necessary and modified his motion to the following: move to recommend to the
BOCC to issue Resolution 04-174, opposing the "Proposed Constitutional Initiative Petition to
Increase the Homestead Exemption by $25,000" and launch an information campaign to make the
public aware of the consequences approval of the additional exemption would have in their
communities. John K. seconded the motion. Motion passed (10-2, Mark and Pat voted no).
Fiscal Year 2004-2005 Bud«et Hi«hU«hts
Doug briefly explained a memo handed to CBC members dated June 15,2004, which lists projects that will
have a significant financial impact to the 2004-2005 Budget (Please refer to memo # 04-110 from County
Administrator for details). Staff and CBC members discussed briefly each item described in the memo.
Jail Overcrowdin« and other issues re«ardin« the Shedirs Bud«et
Doug gave a brief background of the actions taken regarding this mater. In regards to the jail pods, the first
pod is expected to be on line by the 18t of may 2005, the second, approximately a month later. He also
mentioned that in regards to the correctional officers that will be needed to run these pods, the BOCC
approved during the Budget Workshops, last July, to set a contingency fund ($500,000) that would allow
to hire them whenever necessalY·
Doug informed committee members about the BOCC authorization to send inmates to Highlands Coun~
temporarily, until the more long term solutions to the overcrowding are set in place. There is a cap of
$100,000 set to be spent on this temporary solution.
Doug also related to committee members about staffs trip to Alachua County (Gainesville) and the ideas they
got for working on solutions for jail overcrowding. He stated he is optimistic about some of the ideas they
have come up with at Alachua County for processing cases faster to keep the system moving; he believes
they may work for this County. Meanwhile, the St. Lucie County BOCC has authorized staff to go out for
Request for Proposals to do a study of this County's criminal justice system (estimated cost of the analysis
is $100,000).
Doug stated that the reason why he is requesting the CBC members to have an extraordinary meeting on
July 2, 2004 is because the BOCC requested for the CBC members to make recommendations on several
of the issues regarding the Jail overcrowding (to be discussed by the BOCC at their regular meeting
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
June 16. 2004
page 2
'-
'-"'
~
scheduled for July 13, 2004) .
The matters to be discussed are temporary solutions to the overcrowding, such as what would it cost to put
up a low-tech dormitory type building where tent city was for low risk offenders. By doing this, an existing
dormitory at the jail would free up to accommodated more serious offenders, but it would need to be
remodeled for this purpose (convert it into a maximum security facility). County and Sheriffs staffs have
been instructed to bring to the BOCC estimates for a (fairly reasonable) cost to do this, as well as an estimate
of how much the operating costs of the jail would increase to, once these solutions are put in place.
Doug stated that another issue to be discussed, is that the Sheriff has asked for $527,477.98 to cover the
cost to hire, train and equip additional personnel at the jail. He stated that it is also necessary to analyze
if there will be any other budget shortfalls, due to this situation.
Toby Long, Finance Director for the Sheriffs Office handed out information comparing Alachua County to
St. Lucie County to illustrate the inmate to staff ratio (8.06 inmates/ 1 deputy) at the St. Lucie County Jail,
which has reached to a level that jeopardizes its security.
Staff, Committee members and other attendants continued to comment on the aspects of the overcrowding
of the jail, such as the fact that many are there awaiting trial for more than 6 months (serious offenses take
longer to be processed due to their complexity) and spoke about the high volume of cases assigned to each
judge.
Doug brieily explained some of the ideas they have come up with at Alachua County to speed up the
processing of cases in their judicial system. He also mentioned that at Alachua the have implemented the
GPS system to monitor people who are awaiting trial and are under house arrest (some of the accused pay
off from their salary for this privilege - $7/ day, opposed to costing -$50/day to the county jail).
NEXT MEETING
Bill proposed to call the roll to verify how many members could attend the July 2, 2004 extraordinary CBC
meeting to discuss the Jail issues (At 7:30 a.m.). Members present (except Debbie, Sylvie and Steven)
stated they can attend, therefore we expect to have a quorum.
The next regular CBC meeting will be held on Friday, July 16, 2004 at 7:30 a,m.(topics to be
announced) .
Both meetings wíl1 be held in Conference Room # 3 of the St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration
Annex.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 9:05 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
William "Bill" Casey, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
June 16.2004
H:\D Secretary\O OMBICBC\MinIMin04\06 18.wpd
page 3
~
'-"
....",
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Extraordinary Meeting:
Meeting Date: July 2,2004
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Kenny Hogan, Ron Parrish, Mark Taynton, William "Bill"Casey, John Knapp,
Edward Lounds, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick, Troy Ingersoll, Carl Hensley, Linda Bartz.
MEMBERS ABSENT: David F. Samuel, Paul Young, Debbie Hawley, Sylvie Kramer, Steven Messer.
OTHERS PRESENT: Major Patrick Tighe, Toby Long, Kathryn Hensley, Jennifer Hill, Doug Anderson
and Marie Gouin.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
Doug went over the agenda and the additions handed out at the meeting and summarized the issues to be
discussed.
MINUTES
The minutes for the June 16,2004 meeting will be presented to the CBC members for approval at the next
regular meeting.
Jail costs and overruns
Doug made a recap of the events regarding this matter and stated the Sheriff had come before the BOCC
a couple of months back and reported on the situation regarding the SLC Jail overcrowding and since then
he had been asked to present different alternatives to solve the problem.
The Sheriffs staff researched different alternatives and has come back with solutions that could be taken
until thejail pods that have been approved for construction are running. These solutions include a low-tech
facility to be erected (permanently) where the former "tent city" was, moving low risk inmates (trustees) into
those and retrofitting an old dorm into a medium security facility. Also, to temporarily transfer some low
risk inmates to another county (Highlands) and to implement a monitoring (GPS) system for individuals
awaiting trial that would be eligible for house arrest (leaving their home only to go to work).
Doug stated that, to date, the Board of County Commissioners has approved $20.5MM to construct two new
jail pods; has also authorised to carry out an assessment of this county's criminaljustice system (estimated
cost $99,480) and to transfer (temporarily) some inmates to Highlands County at a cost that must not go
over $100,000. He also mentioned staiTis making inquiries about the GPS system(expected to be much
more cost effective).
Ca ital Cost to Construct a Low-Tech Housin Faeili at the PTevious Tent Cit Site To ether with
the Ca ital Cost to Convert the Existin Jail Dorm into a Medium-Securit Annual
Operatin£ Costs to Run and Maintain These Two Facilities.
Roger Shinn, Central Services Director, handed out a brief with information his staff had gathered regarding
the options available to construct a low-tech, low-cost housing facility. He explained briefly the pros and
cons of each of the alternatives presented (for details, please refer to handout). Staffs recommendation is
option #1 (metal building, ata cost of$216,300 each- excluding air conditioning), two buildings that would
allow housing 50 inmates each. He also pointed out these costs do not include permitting, restroom and
shower facilities and air conditioning.
CBC members and staff discussed and compared pros and cons for every option and inquired if air
conditioning is a requirement. Major Tighe stated that one of the Florida requirements is to maintain a
normal comfort range of temperature.
~
..."
....,
They also discussed some details of the cost to retrofit Dorm A-I into a medium-security facility and if two
story buildings are feasible for the low-tech buildings (the Sheriffs office had presented a two story building
alternative to the BaCC some months back, but they instructed staff to research for low-cost, low tech
alternatives) and even the possibility of one big building that would accommodate 100 inmates instead of
2 that would accommodate 50 each (not feasible, because of the shape of the area available).
Doug pointed out that if this project is approved and regardless of the option selected, another aspect that
will need to be analyzed and discussed is the annual operating costs of the 2 low-tech buildings and the
retrofitted dorm.
In regards to this matter, Major Tighe referred to memo from County Administration 04-134 addressed to
the BaCC and the CBC listing the annual costs for the low-tech housing facilities (for details please refer
to agenda addition item #2, handed out at the meeting). Doug noted these costs do not include utilities
costs.
Those present also discussed the percentages of the different levels of security and the guidelines to classifY
them as low, medium, maximum security. Major Tighe stated the majority of inmates are medium to
maximum, who can't get out due to their violent past, violent current charges, failing to appear in court, etc.
They also discussed the possibility of hosing federal inmates, considering the revenues coming from this
would help with the operating costs. Toby Long stated that they could provide projections, but they have
to keep in mind that they are only projections and he recalled that, for example, when they prepared the
projections for this year, there was no way they could have predicted that the population would be up 23%
since January.
Bill inquired if it was possible to prepare a low, medium and high scenario to have some kind of idea of what
to expect. Doug added that he understands that projections are just that, but if there is some information
ahead of time, it would allow staff to begin looking for ways to resolve the problem and to find funding.
Major Tighe went over the comparison between the Alachua and St. Lucie County jails and crime statistics
on how SLCJail compares to Alachua and the rest of Florida, rating among top 10 in all the ones discussed
(please refer to his hand out for details) and stated that bottom line, SLC is processing more cases, (and
faster) than Alachua and still can't keep up with the increase in jail population (currently, jail population
is increasing at an average of 32.8 inmates eveIY month).
Members also discussed the advantages of implementing the GPS (monitoring) System and how much it
would alleviate the overcrowding, convictions and the fact that anyone sentenced for 365 days or more go
to State Prison, as well as some aspects of the Federal Inmate Program.
Ed inquired what are the specific questions that need to be resolved at this meeting.
Doug stated that besides the capital costs discussed up to this point, staff needs to know what is the
projected operational cost of the jail in the next 5 years; what will be the cost over and above the current
operating costs, when the new facilities come in line and how they will be funded.
After some more discussion, members agreed for the time being, to decide on the low-tech options and direct
County and Sherifi's staffs to work on determining the operating costs based on that decision.
Mark moved to go fOIWard with option 1 for the low-tech buildings. Troy seconded the motion.
Ed stated it is necessaIY to ad to the motion to direct staff to work with the Sherifi's office in determining
the operations' costs for this option.
Doug inquired if there is any possibility to use the deputies that were recently hired to run those two
buildings until the two new jail pods are in place.
Toby stated he believes it can be done.
Citizen Budget Conunittee Meeting
July 2, 2004
page 2
'-'
'-'
--'
Mark modified his motions to the following: move to go forward with 2 buildings, option 1 (with air
conditioning and insolation), and to direct staff to work with the Sheriff's office in determining the
annual operating costs for this option. Troy seconded. Members present voted yes 9-1 (John K.
Voted no) and motion passed.
Mark Taynton moved to recommend to the BOCC to direct staff to move as expeditiously as possible
to bid for a monitoring system that would allow to put inmates under house arrest. Ron Parrish
seconded the motion. AU members present voted in favor and motion passed.
Sherif1's $527.477.98 Fundinl!: Request to Cover the Jail overcrowdinl!: costs
Toby Long stated this issue was discussed at last year's budget workshop and referred to memo he handed
out to cac members, detailing the costs the jail's overcrowding has generated in recent months. He also
explained briefly some details of handling security at the jail. The costs detailed in the memo are from
October 1,2003 to date, and then projected to September 30,2004.
After discussing this matter, those present agreed this should be declared an emergency and the costs
overruns should be reimbursed through the SherifTReselve Fund, Law Enforcement Impact Fees and the
County's Emergency Reserve.
CBC members also inquired how will these monies will be transferred to the Sheriff and will he return the
excess.
Toby suggested this could be monitored on a monthly basis and disbursed as needed.
Ed moved to recommend reimbursing the Sherif1's Office an amount not to exceed $1,492,500 for
the 2003/2004 budget year from the following funds: $500,000 - Sheriff Salary reserve fund,
$510,000- Law Enforcement Impact Fees (to be collected July-Sept. 2004) and $482,500 designated
from the $8,400,000 Emergency County Reserves and that it should be partiany reimbursed through
penalties assessed against the jail security system contractor. The Sherif1's Office will request
reimbursement as needed, as they may not need the full amount of $482,500. The emergency
reserves could be replenished over 3 months, January thru March 2005 through Law Enforcement
Impact Fees. Carl seconded the motion. AU members present voted in favor.
FY 2003-2004 Security Cost - $484.154 for Providinl!: In-house Security for Security System UpJ!:1'ade
Workers
Doug s stated this is an ongoing problem and that the County is going into litigation with the contractor. The
Sheriffs office will provide more documentation on this matter.
Due to time constraints the meeting had to be adjourned.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBG-regular meeting will be held on Friday, July 16,2004 at 7:30 a.m., i~Conference Room # 3
of the St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex. Topics to be discussed will include an update
of the BOCC's actions on the jail overcrowding and the Sheriffs costs overrun.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 9:15 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
William "Bin- Casey, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
July 2. 2004
H:\O Secretary\O OMBICBCIMinIMin04107 02wpd
page 3
'-øt
St. Lucie County State Revenue Sharing ~ds-Ratings
Douglas Anderson - RE: St. Lucie County State Revenue Sharing Bonds-Ratings
.....,J
Agenda Item
#3
-.....-
......JiIl- S~1IRa"~__ ~!:.
~-
.....
From:
To:
"Wilder.Brent" <Brent. Wilder@SunTrust.com>
"Bradish, Wesley (RBC Dain)" <Wesley.Bradish@Rbcdain.com>, <marieg@co.st-Iucie.fl.us>,
<douga@co.st-Iucie.fl.us>, "Robert Freeman (Robert Freeman)" <rfreeman@bmolaw.com>,
"Brenda Miller (Brenda Miller)" <bmiller@bmolaw.com>, <rclement@bmolaw.com>, "Eckloff,
Nate (RBC Dain)" <Nate.Eckloff@Rbcdain.com>
4/27/2005 10:06 AM
RE: St. Lucie County State Revenue Sharing Bonds-Ratings
Date:
Subject:
Congratulations on the good news. Those are very impressive results given the overall financial uncertainty caused by
last year's storms.
Brent
-----Original Message-----
From: Bradish, Wesley (RBC Dain) [mailto:Wesley.Bradish@Rbcdain.com]
Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005 7:07 PM
To: marieg@co.st-lucie.fI.us; douga@co.st-lucie.fI.us; Robert Freeman (Robert Freeman ); Brenda Miller (Brenda
Miller); rclement@bmolaw.com; Wilder. Brent; Eckloff, Nate (RBC Dain)
Subject: St. Lucie County State Revenue Sharing Bonds-Ratings
I'>. / r
f"T I b) t/J/ ~,,/J~J:.(
Š 0 '. C;(· ,>~,
C I'~ (!, ~
Ratings will be released tomorrow and reports should be issued late tomorrow or Thursday, f1 AfV"
Underlying ratings have been confirmed as follows:
S&P:A
Moody's: A2
Regards,
Wesley Bradish
Fixed Income Capital Markets
RBC Dain Rauscher
(303) 595-1208
(303) 885·5979 (C)
RBC Dain Rauscher does not accept buy. sell or cancel orders bye-mail, or any inslructions by e-mail that would require your signature, InfonnB1ion contained in this
communication is not considered an official record of your account and does notsupersede normal trade confirmatioos or statements, Any irúonnation provided has
been prepared fi'om sources believed to be rei iable but is not guaranteed, does not reprl:Sent all available data necessary for making investment decisions and is for
informB1ional purposes only,
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related riglts and obligations, Any distribution. use or copying ofthis e-mail or
the infonnation it contains by other than an intended recipient is unauthorized, If you receive this e-mail ¡'n error, please advise me (by return e-mail or otherwise)
immediately,
Infonnation received by or sent from this system is subject to review by supervisory personnel. is retained and may be produced to regulatory authorities or others with
a legal right to the information,
************************************************
The information transmitted is intended solely
for the individual or entity to which it is
addressed and may contain confidential and/or
r= 1 _ .,,~ \ T"'\, _ _
_ _..._n/",n_u...1n/""^{'"t_.&..¿~u___\ A ..J___~__~_....___....._ .\T _ __'n/"'n~_.u.~____\m____\"""T1nn^f'\1 TT'T'''''' AI.,'7''''''''C
,
~~9i~~E~derson - FW: St. LuCie (C~f) FL-Moody's'Report
'-Î
'tttt¡
Page 11 .
.'
"
From: "Bradish, Wesley (RBC Dain)" <Wesley.Bradish@Rbcdain.com>
To: "Robert Freeman (Robert Freeman)" <rfreeman@bmolaw,com>, "Brenda Miller
(Brenda Miller)" <bmiller@bmolaw,com>, <brent.wilder@suntrust.com>, <rclement@bmolaw.com>,
<marieg@co.st-Iucie.fl.us>, <douga@co,st-Iucie.fl.us>, "Eckloff, Nate (RBC Dain)"
<Nate. Eckloff@Rbcdain,com>
Date: 5/5/2005 4:43:22 PM
Subject: FW: St. Lucie (County of) FL-Moody's Report
-----Original Message-----
From: Moody's Investors Service [mailto:epi@moodys.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 2: 18 PM
To: Bradish, Wesley (RBC Dain) ~
Subject: SI. Lucie (County oD FL//.- 6 o/J J-I
MOODY'S ASSIGNS AN INlTlt( A2yJDERL YING RATING TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY'S
(FL) ~
$12,6 MILLION STATE REVENUE SHARING IMPROVEMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES
./?6õ5-\
~ 1 I,¿ER RATING AFFIRMED {i . P (L-
St."Cucie (County of) FL fÛJ7 ~
ounty
Florida ~., €. ()
Moody's Rating //..4.~/l "þ6
Underlying rrÞ/'
Issue Rating
Rating ;¡:l,../ ~
State Revenue Sharing Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series
2005 A2
Aaa
Sale Amount $12,570,000
Expected Sale Date 05/12/05
Rating Description Sales and Use Tax
NEW YORK, May 5, 2005 -- Moody's Investors Service has assigned an
initial A2 underlying rating to St. Lucie County's (FL) $12.57 million
State Revenue Sharing Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, The bonds
are secured by the county's portion of pledged revenue sharing trust
fund receipts collected and distributed to the county on a monthly basis
according to a population and proportionate sales tax collections
formula, The A2 rating reflects increases in the county's pledged state
revenue sharing receipts and adequate debt service coverage. Bond
proceeds will be used for courthouse improvements ($6,2
mill) and environmentally sensitive land acquisition ($6,38 mill). The
bonds are expected to be insured by Ambac. Subject to Moody's reception
of the appropriate documentation, the bonds are expected to carry
Ambac's financial strength rating of Aaa,
At this time, Moody's has also affirmed the A1 issuer rating on St.
'-'
D~~iïãS1~ñjierson - FW: St. Lucie (County of) ~oody's Report
~
Page '2)
Lucie County. This rating is based on the county's growing economy,
strong commercial and residential development, increasing property
values, below-state average socioeconomic indicators, and healthy
financial operations,
GROWING PLEDGED STATE REVENUE SHARING RECEIPTS ADEQUATELY COVER MAXIMUM
ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE
In 2000, the Florida State Legislature eliminated intangible tax
revenues from Revenue Sharing Trust Fund distribution and replaced it
with 2,25% of sales and use tax proceeds, This change in legislature
caused a 13.7% decrease in revenue sharing funds statewide, and a 14%
decrease in St. Lucie County in 2001, As a percent of total state-wide
distribution, St. Lucie County's receipts have increased 3,9%, to ,94%
in 2004 from, 91 % in 2002. Effective July 1, 2004 the state legislature
decreased the percentage of sales and use taxes transferred to the trust
fund from 2,25% to 2,044%, Despite this change, the county's pledged
state revenue sharing receipts grew 14.7% from 2001 to 2004. Moody's
believes that the new distribution percentage will not materially impact
the credit quality of the county's state revenue sharing revenue bonds.
According to Florida Statute 218,25, local governments are limited to
pledging not more than 50% of the state revenue sharing receipts of the
prior fiscal year of to pay debt service, Therefore, with a maximum
annual debt service
(MADS) of $989,500, and 50% of 2004 receipts at $1,672 million, MADS
coverage is a favorable 1.69 times,
The state revenue sharing distribution provides each county with a
guaranteed entitlement component, which is a floor on receipts, St.
Lucie County's guaranteed entitlement is $805,983, At this minimum, 50%
of receipts would equal $402,992, dropping MADS coverage to .41 times,
HEALTHY FINANCIAL POSITION; MODEST NON-REIMBURSEABLE HURRICANE DAMAGE
Moody's expects the county's financial operations to remain healthy due
to significant tax revenue growth, a history of conservative budgeting,
and improved management policies that include General Fund reserves
maintained at 5% of operations, Revenue growth is likely to continue due
to steady increases in population and projections of significant
increases in taxable values.
Despite a $7 million decline in General Fund balance from 2002 to 2003,
the county maintained a healthy 18,5% fund balance as a percent of
revenues, For fiscal year 2004, the county projects an increase in tax
revenues of 56.4%, and a General Fund operating surplus about $1
million, Due to concerns regarding past draw downs in the General Fund
balance for capital expenditures, the county has instituted a new policy
to hold reserves equal to 5% of total operations, Another 3% of General
Fund operations will also be held in reserves, totaling budgeted
reserves of $16,3 million for fiscal year 2005, roughly 19% of the
General Fund budget.
Due to considerable damage caused by the hurricanes late in fiscal year
2004, the county used its full Emergency Reserve ($8.4 million) and
expects future unreimbursed costs of $7.3 million, which has been
budgeted into fiscal year 2005, To date, the county has received
1ºü9Jas Anderson' - FW: St. Lucie (CWOf)FL-Moody'sReport
\J
.."
,.:" ',,·~'J?ãge-31 .
approximately 36% of its total $107 million reimbursable hurricane
costs, and has used cash-on-hand from gas taxes to pay the difference.
ECONOMIC GROWTH CAUSED BY SIGNIFICANT RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT
Located on the east-south-central coast of Florida, St. Lucie County has
an historically agricultural economy that is experiencing rapid
commercial and residential development driven by relatively low land
costs, increasingly urban building opportunities, and steady property
taxes, The county has below average socio-economic indices; in 1999, per
capita income and median family income were 87.2% and 90.7% of state
respectively, and 2004 annual unemployment is high for the region at
8.2% (4.6% statewide), Unemployment is down significantly from high
1990's levels that peaked at 14.3% in 1994.
However, since 2000, population has grown 7.8% to approximately 207,000
and property values have averaged 11,4% annual growth. In addition, the
number of residential building permits issued per year increased 66%
from 1999 to 2003, and the value of these permits increased 89.7%.
Moody's believes that strong tax base growth is likely to continue due
to the county's close proximity to employment opportunities, especially
in Palm Beach County, affordable housing in the county (2000 census
Median Housing Value was 82% of the state's), new residential
development, and recent commercial growth and diversification.
The primary areas of commercial growth in the county are in healthcare,
services, schools, county government, and construction. Recent additions
to the commercial economy in the county include two Walmart
supercenters, a Walmart distribution center, two Lowe's, an 1800-acre
research and education park and plans for a new industrial park. The
research and education park will be certified by the state in mid-2005
and current tenants include the U,S.
Department of Agriculture and the University of Florida. Commercial
growth has led to an average increase in wages of one dollar per year.
In addition, labor force and employment growth are above average between
1999 and 2003 at 15.5% (10,9% statewide) and 17.4% (9.4% statewide)
respectively,
MODEST DIRECT DEBT LEVELS
Although the county may face some future debt needs to cover repairs
from hurricane damage, Moody's expects the county's debt position to--
remain manageable given expectations of continued strong tax base
growth. As of 2004, the overall debt burden is 0,87% and the direct debt
burden is a favorable 0.67%. Principal payout on the county's state
revenue sharing bonds is relatively slow during the first ten years at
about 39%; however, all of the bonds are retired within 20 years, The
five-year capital plan contains about
$183 million in projects; however, 36% of the projects' costs are for
the county's enterprise systems. The county is also seeking
intergovernmental assistance and grants for many of their public works
projects which account for another 36% of the total CIP. Finally, in
November 2002 county voter's approved a referendum to construct a
county-wide parks system over 20-years, using a new 0,25 mills.
STATISTICS
'-r
59jJ9ìäš~person - FW: St. Lucie (County ~Y's Report
~
Page 4]
Security: State Revenue Sharing Trust Receipts, bonding is limited to a
level of 50% of previous fiscal year's receipts
Growth in State Rev Sharing receipts, FY 2000-2004: -3%
MADs Coverage for Sales Tax revenue bond by
FY 2004 State Rev Sharing revenues (50%): 1,69 times
Additional Bonds Test: 1,35 times
State Rev Sharing Bond Payout, Ten Years: 39.4%
General Fund Balance as % of revenues, 2003: 18.7%
Operating Tax Rate as % of limit, FY 2005: 75.4%
1999 Per Capita Income as % of State: 90,7%
1999 Median Family Income as % of State: 87,2%
Unemployment Rate, 2004 Annual: 8,2%
ANAL YSTS:
Baye Emery, Analyst, Public Finance Group, Moody's Investors Service
John Incorvaia, Backup Analyst, Public Finance Group, Moody's Investors
Service
CONTACTS:
Journalists: (212) 553-0376
Research Clients: (212) 553-1653
Copyright 2005, Moody's Investors Service, Inc, and/or its licensors
including Moody's Assurance Company, Inc, (together, "MOODY'S"), All
rights reserved,
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY COPYRiGHT LAW AND NONE
OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED,
FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD,
OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART,
IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT
MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT. All information contained herein is
obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and
reliable, Because of the possibility of human or mechanical error as
well as other factors, however, such information is provided "as is"
without warranty of any kind and MOODY'S, in particular, makes no
representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy,
timeliness, completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular
purpose of any such information, Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S
have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in
whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error
(negligent or
ttJ
t.,
~glasÆderson - FW: S1. Lucie (CO~f)FkMoody's Report '
".
pã9ë5] .
'.
otherwise) or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the
control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or
agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation,
analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any
such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential,
compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without
limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the
possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to
use, any such information, The credit ratings and financial reporting
analysis observations, if any, constituting part of the information
contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of
opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell
or hold any securities. NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE
ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY
PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS
GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Each rating
or other opinion must be weighed solely as one factor in any investment
decision made by or on behalf of any user of the information contained
herein, and each such user must accordingly make its own study and
evaluation of each security and of each issuer and guarantor of, and
each provider of credit support for, each security that it may consider
purchasing, holding or selling. MOODY'S hereby discloses that most
issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds,
debentures, notes and commercial
paper) and preferred stock rated by MOODY'S have, prior to assignment of
any rating, agreed to pay to MOODY'S for appraisal and rating services
rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to $2,300,000, Moody's
Corporation (MCO) and its wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary,
Moody's Investors Service (MIS), also maintain policies and procedures
to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes,
Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between
directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold
ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership
interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually on Moody's website
at www.moodys.com under the heading "Shareholder Relations - Corporate
Governance - Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy."
RBC Dain Rauscher does not accept buy, sell or cancel orders bye-mail, or any instructions bye-mail that
would require your signature. Information contained in this communication is not considered an official
record of your account-and does not supersede normal trade confirmations or statements..--Any
information provided has been prepared from sources believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed, does
not represent all available data necessary for making investment decisions and is for informational
purposes only.
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and
obligations. Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an
intended recipient is unauthorized, If you receive this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or
otherwise) immediately.
Information received by or sent from this system is subject to review by supervisory personnel, is retained
and may be produced to regulatory authorities or others with a legal right to the information.
"'-
)9.~9i~!ðn~derson - FW: St. Lucie (County of) F~oody's Report '
... ..J
- Page 1 ]
From: "Bradish, Wesley (RBC Dain)" <Wesley,Bradish@Rbcdain,com>
To: <jwhoward@bear.com>, "Brenda Miller (Brenda Miller)" <bmiller@bmolaw,com>,
"Robert Freeman (Robert Freeman)" <rfreeman@bmolaw.com>, <rclement@bmolaw.com>,
<marieg@co,st-lucie,fl.us>, <douga@co,st-Iucie.fl.us>, "Eckloff, Nate (RBC Dain)"
<Nate, Eckloff@Rbcdain.com>
Date: 5/5/2005 4:46:06 PM
Subject: FW: S1. Lucie (County of) FL-Moody's Report
-----Original Message-----
From: Moody's Investors Service [mailto:epi@moodys,com]
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 2:24 PM
To: Bradish, Wesley (RBC Dain)
Subject: S1. Lucie (County of) FL
....,.,..-"\
/ ,
MQODY'S ASSIG,NS A2,UNDERL YING RATING TO ST, LUCIE COUNTY'S (FL) $12,3
ILOON SALES TAX-REFUNDING AND IMPROVEMENT REVENUE BONDS, SERIES 2005
A2 AFFIRMATION AFFECTS $75,7 MILLION IN OUTSTANDING PARITY DEBT,
INCLUDING CURRENT ISSUE
"
Št. Lucie (County of) FL
County
Florida
Moody's Rating
Issue
Rating
Underlying
Rating
Sales Tax Refunding and Improvement Revenue Revenue Bonds,
Series 2005 A2
Aaa
Sale Amount $12,315,000
Expected Sale Date 05/12/05
Rating Description Sales and Use Tax
NEW YORK, May 5,2005 -- Moody's Investors Service has assigned an A2
underlying rating to S1. Lucie County's (FL) $12,315 million Sales Tax
Refunding and Improvement Revenue Bonds, Series 2005, At this time
Moody's also affirms the A2 rating on $75,745 million in parity debt,
including this issue, The bonds are secured by the county's portion of
the half-cent sales tax receipts collected and distributed by the state
and based on point of origin, The A2 rating reflects the county's
growing share of pledged sales tax receipts and adequate debt service
coverage, Bond proceeds will be used to refund the county's outstanding
Improvement Revenue Note, Series 2004 ($10
million) and to finance the acquisition of certain environmentally
sensitive lands within the county ($2.3 million). The bonds are expected
to be insured by Ambac, Subject to Moody's reception of the appropriate
documentation, the bonds are expected to carry Ambac's financial
strength rating of Aaa.
,o.Y.9!.a!!:Añþerson ~ FW: St. Lucie(CtJa J/ùf)FL-Moody'sReport
\,J
..,
Pa9~ 2.] .
At this time, Moody's has also affirmed the A 1 issuer rating on St.
Lucie County, This rating is based on the county's growing economy,
strong commercial and residential development, increasing property
values, below-state average socioeconomic indicators, and healthy
financial operations,
GROWING PLEDGED HALF-CENT SALES TAX RECEIPTS ADEQUATELY COVER MAXIMUM
ANNUAL DEBT SERVICE
Moody's believes steady growth in pledged half-cent sales tax receipts
will continue to provide adequate debt service coverage for the bonds.
Pledged half-cent sales tax receipts have grown 34.1 % between 1999 and
2003 and have an estimated 18,7% increase in 2004 to $7.684 million.
Additionally, projected increases based on the first six months of
fiscal year 2005 receipts show a further increase of 12.9% to $8,678
million for the year. From 1999 to 2003, 51. Lucie County receipts grew
10.8% as a percent of total state-wide distribution to 0.45%, Maximum
annual debt service (MADS) is increasing with the Series 2005 issue to
$5.037 million from $4,056 million previously.
Therefore, using 2004 projected receipts ($7,683 million), MADS coverage
declined 19% from 1.89 to a still adequate 1,53 times. Debt service for
Series
2003 and Series 2005 is level and debt service payments will be close to
MADS by 2006, Given projected increases in half-cent sales tax receipts
however, coverage is likely to improve,
Rapid population growth in Port S1. Lucie, the county's largest
incorporated area, has lead to a 16,5% increase in its allocation since
1994, and conversely, a decline in the county's allocation from 55,6% in
1994 to 54.1 % in 2003. The sales tax distribution between the county and
the incorporated municipalities is based on a population-based formula
which protects counties with a minimum 40% share of total half-cent
sales tax receipts distributed in the county even in the case of full
incorporation. At the 40% minimum, the county's 2004 projected receipts
would be $5,69 million, resulting in a MADS coverage of 1,13, Moody's
believes that continued overall growth in county-wide half-cent sales
tax receipts will offset any reductions in the county's proportionate
share,
Effective July 1, 2004, the state's HB 113-A decreased the percentage of
sales tax distributed to the Half-Cent Sales Tax Trust Fund from 9.653%
to 8,814%, reducing the sales tax distribution to local governments, The
reduction is in response to the state government assuming
responsibilities previously performed by local governments. While there
is no assurance that the percentage distribution formula would not be
further reduced in the future, Moody's believes that the new
distribution percentage will not materially impact the credit quality of
the county's sales tax revenue bonds,
HEALTHY FINANCIAL POSITION; MODEST NON-REIMBURSEABLE HURRICANE DAMAGE
Moody's expects the county's financial operations to remain healthy due
to significant tax revenue growth, a history of conservative budgeting,
and improved management policies that include General Fund reserves
maintained at 5% of operations, Revenue growth is likely to continue due
to steady increases in population and projections of significant
'-'
~-- '., ..... .~
,-ºuglas AJlderson - FW: St. Lucie (County of) FL-Moody's Report.
10.... tI
"-p~~'
increases in taxable values.
Despite a $7 million decline in General Fund balance from 2002 to 2003,
the county maintained a healthy 18,5% fund balance as a percent of
revenues, For fiscal year 2004, the county projects an increase in tax
revenues of 56.4%, and a General Fund operating surplus about $1
million, Due to concerns regarding past draw downs in the General Fund
balance for capital expenditures, the county has instituted a new policy
to hold reserves equal to 5% of total operations, Another 3% of General
Fund operations will also be held in reserves, totaling budgeted
reserves of $16,3 million for fiscal year 2005, roughly 19% of the
General Fund budget.
Due to considerable damage caused by the hurricanes late in fiscal year
2004, the county used its full Emergency Reserve ($8.4 million) and
expects future unreimbursed costs of $7.3 million, which has been
budgeted into tiscal year 2005, To date, the county has received
approximately 36% of its total $107 million reimbursable hurricane
costs, and has used cash-on-hand from gas taxes to pay the difference.
ECONOMIC GROWTH CAUSED BY SIGNIFICANT RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL
DEVELOPMENT
Located on the east-south-central coast of Florida, St. Lucie County has
an historically agricultural economy that is experiencing rapid
commercial and residential development driven by relatively low land
costs, increasingly urban building opportunities, and steady property
taxes. The county has below average socia-economic indices; in 1999, per
capita income and median family income were 87.2% and 90.7% of state
respectively, and 2004 annual unemployment is high for the region at
8,2% (4,6% statewide), Unemployment is down significantly from high
1990's levels that peaked at 14,3% in 1994.
However, since 2000, population has grown 7.8% to approximately 207,000
and property values have averaged 11.4% annual growth, In addition, the
number of residential building permits issued per year increased 66%
from 1999 to 2003, and the value of these permits increased 89.7%,
Moody's believes that strong tax base growth is likely to continue due
to the county's close proximity to employment opportunities, especially
in Palm Beach County, affordable housing in the county (2000 census
Median Housing Value was 82% of the state's), new residential
development, and recent commercial growth and diversification.
The primary areas of commercial growth in the county are in healthcare,
services, schools, county government, and construction. Recent additions
to the commercial economy in the county include two Walmart
supercenters, a Walmart distribution center, two Lowe's, an 1800-acre
research and education park and plans for a new industrial park, The
research and education park will be certified by the state in mid-2005
and current tenants include the U,S.
Department of Agriculture and the University of Florida, Commercial
growth has led to an average increase in wages of one dollar per year.
In addition, labor force and employment growth are above average between
1999 and 2003 at 15,5% (10,9% statewide) and 17.4% (9.4% statewide)
respectively.
MODEST DIRECT DEBT LEVELS
\J
)ou las Anderson - FW: St. Lucie (Co
of) FL-Moody's Report
Although the county may face some future debt needs to cover repairs
from hurricane damage, Moody's expects the county's debt position to
remain manageable given expectations of continued strong tax base
growth. As of 2004, the overall debt burden is 0,87% and the direct debt
burden is a favorable 0,67%. Principal payout on the county's sales tax
revenue bonds is slow during the first ten years at about 28%; however,
all of the bonds are retired within
28 years. The five-year capital plan contains about $183 million in
projects; however, 36% of the projects' costs are for the county's
enterprise systems.
The county is also seeking intergovernmental assistance and grants for
many of their public works projects which account for another 36% of the
total CIP,
Finally, in November 2002 county voter's approved a referendum to
construct a county-wide parks system over 20-years, using a new 0,25
mills.
STATISTICS
Security: County's share of half-cent sales tax receipts deposited into
the Local Government Half-Cent Sales Tax Trust Fund
Growth in County's share of Half-Cent receipts, FY 2000-2004: 48%
MADs Coverage for Sales Tax revenue bond by,
FY 2003 Half-Cent Pledged revenues: 1,29 times
FY 2004 Half-Cent Pledged revenues (estimated): 1,53 times
Post-Sale Sales Tax Bonds Outstanding: $75,745 million
Sales Tax Bond Payout, Ten Years: 27,9%
Direct Debt Burden: .67%
General Fund Balance as % of revenues, 2003: 18.7%
Operating Tax Rate as % of limit, FY 2005: 75.4%
1999 Per Capita Income as % of State: 90.7%
1999 Median Family Income as % of State: 87.2%
Unemployment Rate, 2004 Annual: 8.2%
ANAL YSTS:
Baye Emery, Analyst, Public Finance Group, Moody's Investors Service
John Incorvaia, Backup Analyst, Public Finance Group, Moody's Investors
Service
CO NT ACTS:
Journalists: (212) 553-0376
Research Clients: (212) 553-1653
'-"
~
!~9~~!.~!!gerson - FW: St. Lucie (County of) FL-Moody's Report '
'"- ~
Page 51
Copyright 2005, Moody's Investors Service, Inc, and/or its licensors
including Moody's Assurance Company, Inc. (together, "MOODY'S"). All
rights reserved.
ALL INFORMATION CONTAINED HEREIN IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW AND NONE
OF SUCH INFORMATION MAY BE COPIED OR OTHERWISE REPRODUCED, REPACKAGED,
FURTHER TRANSMITTED, TRANSFERRED, DISSEMINATED, REDISTRIBUTED OR RESOLD,
OR STORED FOR SUBSEQUENT USE FOR ANY SUCH PURPOSE, IN WHOLE OR IN PART,
IN ANY FORM OR MANNER OR BY ANY MEANS WHATSOEVER, BY ANY PERSON WITHOUT
MOODY'S PRIOR WRITTEN CONSENT, All information contained herein is
obtained by MOODY'S from sources believed by it to be accurate and
reliable. Because of the possibifity of human or mechanical error as
well as other factors, however, such information is provided "as is"
without warranty of any kind and MOODY'S, in particular, makes no
representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy,
timeliness, completeness, merchantability or fitness for any particular
purpose of any such information. Under no circumstances shall MOODY'S
have any liability to any person or entity for (a) any loss or damage in
whole or in part caused by, resulting from, or relating to, any error
(negligent or
otherwise) or other circumstance or contingency within or outside the
control of MOODY'S or any of its directors, officers, employees or
agents in connection with the procurement, collection, compilation,
analysis, interpretation, communication, publication or delivery of any
such information, or (b) any direct, indirect, special, consequential,
compensatory or incidental damages whatsoever (including without
limitation, lost profits), even if MOODY'S is advised in advance of the
possibility of such damages, resulting from the use of or inability to
use, any such information. The credit ratings and financial reporting
analysis observations, if any, constituting part of the information
contained herein are, and must be construed solely as, statements of
opinion and not statements of fact or recommendations to purchase, sell
or hold any securities, NO WARRANTY, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, AS TO THE
ACCURACY, TIMELINESS, COMPLETENESS, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY
PARTICULAR PURPOSE OF ANY SUCH RATING OR OTHER OPINION OR INFORMATION IS
GIVEN OR MADE BY MOODY'S IN ANY FORM OR MANNER WHATSOEVER. Each rating
or other opinion must be weighed solely as one factor in any investment
decision made by or on behalf of any user of the information contained
herein, and each such user must accordingly make its own study and
~evaluation of each security and of each issuer and guarantor of, and
each provider of credit support for, each security that it may consider
purchasing, holding or selling. MOODY'S hereby discloses that most
issuers of debt securities (including corporate and municipal bonds,
debentures, notes and commercial
paper) and preferred stock rated by MOODY'S have, prior to assignment of
any rating, agreed to pay to MOODY'S for appraisal and rating services
rendered by it fees ranging from $1,500 to $2,300,000, Moody's
Corporation (MCO) and its wholly-owned credit rating agency subsidiary,
Moody's Investors Service (MIS), also maintain policies and procedures
to address the independence of MIS's ratings and rating processes.
Information regarding certain affiliations that may exist between
directors of MCO and rated entities, and between entities who hold
ratings from MIS and have also publicly reported to the SEC an ownership
interest in MCO of more than 5%, is posted annually on Moody's website
_, ,_.___ ' ~lli'" ,. ' ,"
!o~la!! A~_derson -FW: St. Lucie (County of)"FL-Moody'sRepo,rt
tJ
îtJ
---------1
Page 6
at www,moodys,com under the heading "Shareholder Relations - Corporate
Governance - Director and Shareholder Affiliation Policy,"
RBC Dain Rauscher does not accept buy, sell or cancel orders bye-mail, or any instructions bye-mail that
would require your signature. Information contained in this communication is not considered an official
record of your account and does not supersede normal trade confirmations or statements, Any
information provided has been prepared from sources believed to be reliable but is not guaranteed, does
not represent all available data necessary for making investment decisions and is for informational
purposes only.
This e-mail may be privileged and/or confidential, and the sender does not waive any related rights and
obligations, Any distribution, use or copying of this e-mail or the information it contains by other than an
intended recipient is unauthorized. If you receive this e-mail in error, please advise me (by return e-mail or
otherwise) immediately.
Information received by or sent from this system is subject to review by supervisory personnel, is retained
and may be produced to regulatory authorities or others with a legal right to the information,
........
'-'
.....,
Agenda Item
#4
Downtown Fort Pierce Projects:
Clerk of Circuit Monumental
Court Building Staircase District Cooling
Project Budget $ 6,900,000,00 $ 1,238,000,00 $ 1,910,000,00
Lowest Bid: $ 10,922,972,00 $ $
Total project Cost Increase: $ 4,022,972,00 $ 1,238,000.00 $ 1,910,000,00
Sources:
Improvement Bonds, Series 2005* $ 3,000,000.00 $ 1,238,000.00 $ 1,910,000,00
Sales Tax Bond, Series 2003 $ 921,735.00
Other Sources $ 2,978,265.00
$ 6,900,000.00
Recommendations:
Court Facilities Fund·· $ 1,222,771.00
Court Facilities Fund - Court Costs··· $ 150,587.00
Court Facilities Fund···· $ 200,000,00
Public Building Impact Fees $ 1,739,172.00
$ 3,312,530.00
Total Sources: $ 10,212,530.00 $ 1,238,000.00 $ 1,910,000.00
Balance $ (710,442.00) $ $
Notes:
. Improvement Bonds, Series 2005- in the process of issuing the bonds. est. closing date 4/30/05
1··Fund 170
I
Total
$ 1,548.664,61
$ 355,004,00
$ (29,110,72)
$ 1,222,771,33
available cash as of 3/24/05
Less:
PO's
Adjustments to be done
.UNo longer receiving these funds-Art V (as of 3/24/05)
····Estimated collection from March to September
"-'
~
.,
'-'
..~_ __.__ __ .____ _. ____---n----.--
AI ~I I I' it ,I:
~
.....--.-
..-----.
.--..-.
---..-
..---....
~...-."~
..,.....- - . ..~
.~_.-..
....-.-.
.-----
----.---
~
. ,I, ';,-!'
EDL.UND . OAITENBAS · BINKLEY
ARCHITECTS AND ASSOCIATES. P.A.
M ember"S 0" 1;hB AmeJ"'¡Can 1~1!!it:r.;u!;e of Archil:ecœ
AA#AACa:;x:JEJ86
')
11 ~ ~t
~ho¡'¡ CJ Q~
~~I ,..V ~O 1/
c·IU/}f1{\~ \fll
\ tPV
May 9, 2005
Doug Anderson
County Administrator
St. Lucie County Central Services
2300 Virginia A venue
Fort Pierce, FL 34982
Re: Clerk oftbe Court Bid Award
Dear Mr. Anderson,
It is with this letter that EDB ArchiteCts recommends awarding the bid for the Clerk of Court
Office Building to the apparent 10w bidder, Team Construction in the amount of$l 0,922,972.00.
Upon tbe county commission'!\ award of bid and completion of the OwnerfContractor agreement,
we will commence the value engineering services to reduce the constrUction cost of the project
by approximately $800,000. The conttact amount v.ill be reduced accordingly by way of
deductive change orders throughout the value engineering process.
The Purchasing Department and the County Legal Department have close!)' managed and
scrutinized the contract documents, the bid procedure, the apparent Jow bidder's qualifications
and bonding requirements and an:his time, all elements appear to be in order rendering this a
c1ean bid.
The fiTst phase of constrUction win be completion of the parking lot south of St Andrew's School
and Church. School is out 2 June 2005 and back in session on 8 August 2005, allowing a
window of opportUnity to completc the parking lot and improve the parking situation adjacent to
the judicial complex.
lIJ regards to construction permit statUS, we have received some minor comments from the City
of Fort Pierce Engineering Department, which are being addressed. A City of Fort Pierce plan
reviewer has started the review process for final building permits. No permits are required for
the parking lot imprcwcmems south of St. Andrew's.
65 Rcyal Palm Point:e. Suit;e [J. VSr'O Besch. FL. 32800
V.,.o B.aoh 772/S89-432D c..rfteld ø..c:h 9154/42S-0995
"ax 7711/Seg.S2DIiJ F.x 9154/421.828.
-..'
...¡".
'wII
~
. _._.. _.___..____..~_.p.n___
Mr. Anderson, though the bids :::x~ed the anticipated project budget, we are c.onfident that
they reflect fair market value. To re-bid the project considering the current economic stonn and
spiraling construction inflation surrounding our geographic area, may only result in higber bids
the second time aroW1d. We need to proceed as expeditiously as possible to complete this
project over the ne~:t 18 months.
Sincerely,
PoL
Paul U. Dritenbas, A.I.A.
Architect
xc: Roger Shinn- Director of Centra] Services
Ed Parker- Purchasing Director, St. Lucie County
Dan McIntyre- County Attomcy
F'r ¿
'G.ó. 'J...IHG CNn'03',
J/\í \-/' ~\ ~'~
Ul
''=¡ (~J . t,__. (}
'-J 1_\
E
Q)
+J
-
~i
~ ª
:1
ori-
II å
ð ~
¡ '-
il
~~
¡I
!ã.
I/) =~
W .E ~
UJ '- 0
u. .2:::
~ ! ~
Q. ~ ~
~
,^ i ~
VI II III
C) 1 8
Z III""
ë 11;1 j
§ '~8
"" 'tI!
... q c:
<.J ~~
:::¡ §!
en .. <3-
:) ~ '- ~
Q. ~ ~ .'i
U)
=It
ca
"C
C
Q)
C)
<C
!!
~~!
.r¡
!!
~~!
N.r¡
!!
>~I
~2""
.r¡
!!
~šl
N.r¡
!!
~II
.r¡
!!
>1;1
~"',;>
N.r¡
!!
~§I
N.r¡
~
""
-g
co
c
~
J
ã!~
1i
en :> It>
UJ æ ~
UJ co'"
t~~
0( . ã!
CL i!!€ 1/1
! I ~ E
enQ.8 ...I
C) <p; g
ZQê ..
õ (/) 3 ...
= Ši 1/1 ~
ª ~¡ ã
(.) ,6> ,- t;
_u..'iii III
æ~~ 881
~ ~~
!!
~i!
.r¡
¡:I! It> co
"'~~
:i~~
"''''~
~~":>
.. "''''
Ii. ~g
N ~t
a :~
~:í!:;¡
",co'"
~~~
"'...-
~~....
~ i§
Ñ :it
:E: OIN
... ......
"'....'"
~8<t
.o~"'"
8.....::
;;~":>
i! ~g
".. In 0
~ ;it
~ =~
~~~
110......
~~g
N--
~Ñ'"
"''''
~ ~§
N :is
~ cnC'l
... ......
~E~
.o1lÏ'i
:¡ 8. iit
~.
.. Ng
::; s'"
Ii ~t
~ :~
"'''''''
;;¡;:8~
":llÏgf
~~'"
'" . .
..
~ ~§
Ii :it
~ :~
~';::~
oo",ì1I
!8eñ"~
_co'"
'" . ,
,iit
æ ~§
Ii ~t
N OIN
'" ......
~~
~~
M;
~.~.~~.a.§. §.
iit~~::;"'g !i!
~.....¡~ !
iit
>"'1
~g::o
NIII
~....co
oco
........
$'llÍllÏ
-co
. (9). "7
~;
f8i!i!!:!:jg
00",."'0
;;~Ii~~s
N.....cnN
-............
...
~g1
Nq
$:;
,.....~
r;¡õ
",co
Ñ~
'" ..
.... '"
co ~
~ .0
iit
U)~....'" !:!
~_:í!~ ¡s.
.....ÑÑ;i ¡;¡
~!E!~OI N
....,... ..
~!t
III
ffi~~
....coco
...~~
C'i.~t:1
N_
"''''
:gf85õ!~5õ!'" :2
_o~-~~ co.
~;;~Ñsi;i ¡;¡
'" ",!E!~", N
"'ÑtIIt ..
...
'-"
'--'
.. N
~ ~
S!
iit~
.... :II
::I...
'" N
.. III
.. III
.. ...
",,,,
~ ~
ID It>
'" ,.,
.. ....
.. '"
.. N
......
01 PO
~!;
'" ID
; i
.. or'
... ...
z ~
.. ID
!:II;
.. ...
.....
...
01 '"
~ ~
.. '"
... '"
'" ..
~.,
01 ...
~ ~
.. ..
... ..
.. N
... .,
...
5õ!:¡ :g
~'" ...
'" '" ...
! ~ :g
Uiit
¡::¡:g :E:
0....
vi N ....
!~ :II
;tot
i'
If) i"
~ If)
OIl ~
'Iii ...
8 ~
;: 8
i"~~ §
'" ~::¡ ~ -
"'ClO" !i!
~""vj~ Wi)
"'......... ...
t!. :.-~t!.! :a.
III -e ~t~~~t
_!I ! ~!~iill)~
1~ c>- "'.III~qilll
!.! ,fn ~ ~l~~&l
jJ ~&i f;"i:a:!..~
PI.., ~~J! 16§~d:cfl~l!
!1!:.5 ~i !DI~'tI-..-'tI1I)
.!.... ,¡ '5 ,5 Itìi_..ìilt" II :I
..!~ õ ~ .., ~~~~~G! c
i;~S~'~~l!~!!!~~ti
II~i81¡~¡~!~~~!~1{
àí«~.:! Þ- III
!!
~~!
N.r¡
!
>::1
11.210
.r¡
!!
~~!
.r¡
!
~i!
.r¡
!
~8!
N.r¡
!!
~81
N.r¡
!!
~I!
.r¡
!!
~¡!
.r¡
"
"wi
,~
e
en
~
o
~"''''
co:8~
øó~ó
~¡¡s~
~;;'
,., ~ ~
g. '" ID
! !!
... tit It>
...
"'~::!
C;~'"
,.:..¡U;;
N"'....
"''''...
~;;'
~ ~ 2
-. . '"
~ ~ 5
... ... ~
"'01'"
i!~~
"':ÑÑ
"''''....
co. .... tIf
~~
It> ......
t; e;¡
~ ! 5i
tit tIt:¡
"'''''''
:s!8i!
~Ñgi
""~'~
....
... ,.,,,,
~ ~ ~
i ! i
... tit U
o~:;:¡
~ :g. ID.
"~!i
~"" ,
;;..
~ 5 a
! ~ ~
tit .....
...
~~~
...¡¡¡....
":i,Ñ
!N.~
...
~ 5 ~
Ii! Ii! ID
... ...
... .....
...
~:q:;
.¡¡s..
~~
~
... ,.,..
~ ~ ~
~ ~ ¡
... ......
¡::~
....
ri"':
....'"
"'~
Ñ"':
......
~§~§~~~II'.!
. . . . . . . . t\
~~s¡"~-=!i!'
~ iii~...a~~U
or' ..
......
III '"
!!ot
'"
or'
...
...
~,.,t
~III
~::!!
......(11
...;..:~.
..",
Cf\-.
"'-
......
!§!§a'"
- . . . _::!.
:;:=:¡:g~"
.,.. fltJ.....a
II'.!
.t\
I~
":"
...
PO 01
~ ¡::
.. I::!
¡:: ..
ìl:
... ..
... ...
~!1
",co
"'-
co....
~~
ww
....
o
iit
~§~
§gà
~ :g ~
"\. "f' 0
a- ... PI
III ..
~~
tit
t
~g'
NIII
"'COOl
N........
110 It) co
~~å
·a,
iit
tª8~§
di.Öò
~iit:;;~
8§~
§§~
'" ....
iit
If) ..
:;¡~
: ~
"'..
~...
go- ~. 8. ~ §~~-
'" :ß5õ!5õ!!ijÑ
øa _õCf)møa
vi ~ "
1/1
III
E
...I
~
...
!l
...I
CD
:;)
IL
«
III
iE
o
c
'i
) i
iñ'
2' I:!
~ ê',.:'
~ ,g~
¡ ~ i~
g ~ ~"\ ~
II :e ~~ ~=¡)¡
11 ~!jll!I¡I.ill
~¡J ~~i~~«~Jf~~!~
ii~ i',¡~8!~¡~ü]Î~~
_~ ' è5~.'l_~'2- moo
II~i ,~~I~~~iJII~
~!.t ~~c«~ŒU~UUV
1ií«~.l1
~
~
c vi
~ i:
'õ ~
" ~t ¡XI
t co>"
1! ~ '" ¡;; &~ i
2 ~ § ~..! $
;~~ ¡;;i~1~ ~I
II ~CD ~ ~I!}¡¡! ~
!.!I~l~ ~f~III.8~ ¡¡j
t..OB.~< :>!!Sc ;:)
~CDi!-a ::! ~~~·Ë ffi
rJ!õ~WIII:>Õ'Q >w
~!~Þ-...u.. C/UÞ-<
~ III: i \
-g
~
\..;
'-"
fIJ
""'"
Agenda Item
#6
TO: Board of County Com i
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
MEMORANDUM
05-54
FROM:
Douglas M. Anderson, unty Administrator
DATE:
May 4,2005
RE:
Institute for Law and Policy Planning (ILPP) - Primary Recommendations
One of the primary recommendations by Dr. Kalmanotf in his recent report to the County is
to "develop a pretrial services program; get technical assistance from the Pretrial Services
Resource Center, then implement."
I have received the attached proposal from the PSRC to perform this function. The cost for
these serv,ices is $3,500. During last year's budget process, funding had been set aside in
the amount of $200,000 towards implementation of Dr. Kalmanoffs recommendations. I
plan on proceeding with this recommendation at this time.
Should you have any questions or comments, please let me know.
DMAlab 05-54
c: Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Faye Outlaw, Assistant County Administrator
Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney
Marie Gouin, Management and Budget Director
--Citizens' Budget Development Committee
Public Safety Coordinating Council
Attachment
BOARD OF TRUSTEES
Hon, Tomar Mason
CHAIR
Bany Mahoney, Esq.
VICE CHAIR
David Adair, Esq,
Hon. Deborah A. Agosti
Hon, Pamela G, Alexander
Susan Brannen
Hon, James G. Carr
Noonan Early. Esq,
Robert J. Guttentag
Dennis Hunter
E. Michael McCann, Esq,
Jerome E. McElroy
Howard Messing, Esq,
Dennis MUIJ'hy, Esq,
Carol Oeller
Hon, Frank Orlando
Ha/Jem H. Williams, Jr,
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
D, Alan Henry
DEPUTV DIRECTORS
ADMINISTRATION
Jolanta Juszkiewicz, Ph.D,
PROGRAM
DEVELOPMENT
John Clark
-.. '
~
...;
'twtI
PSRC:
Pretrial Services Resource Center
Committed to improvingjustice at the pretrial stage
April 22, 2005
(\k I .(
þ'~-) ~
~ hC (\
C '. ~p,)
Mr. Doug Anderson
County Administrator
2300 Virginia Ave.
F011 Pierce, FL 34982
Dear Mr. Anderson:
This is a follow-up to our discussion earlier this week conceming the Pretrial
Services Resource Center providing assistance to St. Lucie County, as
recommended by Alan KaJmanoff in his recent report to the County.
I understand that you would like the Center to meet with key judicial officers in
the county to discuss the benefits of establishing a pretrial services agency, with
the expectation that such an agency would likely reduce the crowding situation in
the jail. To do this I'd suggest a one or two day visit to the County, depending on
the number of judicial officers that should be included. A possible agenda would,
after a short meeting with you, begin with a meeting with the Chief Judge. How
we proceed after that would be entirely up to the judges and their schedules; we
could meet with a group or groups of judges or individually, depending on time.
We should also fit in some time to meet with the State's Attomeys Office and
Public Defenders during the visit. Finally, I'd expect there might be other system
actors that you'd like us to visit with because of their involvement in the jail
crowding project. We would subsequently submit a short report, describing our
discussions. If the County then decides to move forward on this, we would be
happy to provide a proposal for helping establish a pretrial program, if you wish.
As M[.__Kalmanoff has likely pointed out, the existence of an effective pretrial
services program in a jurisdiction has been identified as a significant method for
reducing unnecessary pretrial detention. The basis for this lies in the two critical
functions such programs perform: collecting and providing verified information
about all an-estees to judicial officers as soon after arrest as possible so that
appropriate conditions of pretrial release or detention can be imposed. Such
reports usually include an assessment of the defendant's risk to fail to appear
and/or be rearrested during the pretrial stage, based on the verified background
information collected.
The second function such programs provide to the courts is the capacity to
supervise conditions imposed by judicial officers to help. insure the defendant
appears for court and remains arrest-free during the pendenëYöfihècase:
1010 Vennont Avenue, N,W,. Suite 300 Washington. D.C, 20005 (202) 638-3080 Fax (202) 347-O493~ :e-mail psrclã!pretriaJ'\i'~g
Visit our web site at www,pretria/,org ,
'-'
~
'-tII
...",
~'. ..
This will be the gist of what we discllss with the judges, along with experiences in other
jurisdictions, national standards related to the pretrial process and other relevant infomlation.
Assuming a two day visit our invoice would be for $3,500.
Please call or e-mail me if you have thoughts or questions about the above and to discuss
schedules.
Sincerely,
tǣ~n:O-
Executive Director
v
'-'
-ç;¡
't,¡J
INSTITUTE FOR LAW AND POLICY PLANNING
PAGE 144
1.0 "'....-y Røœmn...-.Jalions
The recommendations below are those identified by consultants to be those of highest
priority in terms of an implementation tirneline.
A B C Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4
Restructure the Public Safety Coordinating Council to
create a small executive group and make it a more
effective coordinating body. Recruit a prestigious leader to · ·
aim forcefully at implementation of the recommendations
stemming from this comprehensive assessment.
Create a criminal justice coordinator position, responsible · .
through the County Manager to all system gatekeepers,
{ Devdop a pretrial services program; get technical
assistance from the Pretrial Services Resource Center, then · ·
implement.
The Public Defender should make a more serious effort to
see all arrested offenders, prior to arraignment, and screen · ·
to reduce the defense caseload earlier,
Adopt a county-wide citation in lieu of arrest policy and
invoke a cap and tougher booking restrictions by the · ·
sheriff at the jail that implements this citation policy.
County and community leaders should organize and
strongly support the effort to add more judicial positions · .
in St. Lucie.
The Circuit Court should consider implementing
differentiated case management (DCM) as a means of · ·
assigning cases to judges, taking control of case progress,
deadlines, and delays,
Re-evaluate the bond schedule amounts downwards, and · ·
distinguish between violent and non-vio1ent felonies.
Detennine the jail's future stafftng and bed needs and · ·
costs, before any new crowding becomes a facility crisis.
Do not occupy the new jail pods or build new beds until · .
this report is implemented and a plan is in place
Develop a strategic plan to integrate all criminal justice · .
databases.
Seek an independent professional program audit of the
Public Defender's Office to provide needed support and · .
input on much earlier and stronger system advocacy.
ST. LUCIE COUNTY CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM ASSESSMENT
~
'-"
........,
......,
Agenda Item
#8
';;l.
,¿-:
ø""- ';"-.,- 0"' ,........ -...~
.~~ ;; '$~" ~?:'
'i':";-' ~. v'
!. -~.'
...-~,~:. -..-"
,...:- -:"'"
~fJtrtff
KEN J. MASCARA
, ..':1lJ'..
(f?:~)"
:.:- ' .,
~~~~."
Telephone: (772) 462-3200 . Fax: (772) 489-5851
4700 West Midway Road' Fort Pierce, Florida 34981
May 2, 2005
MAY ~:4 2005
The Honorable Frannie Hutchinson, Chairwoman
St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, FL 34982
Dear Chairwoman Hutchinson
I am pleased to present my budget for the fiscal year 2005-2006. With St. Lucie County in the
midst of a population explosion, the next few years will prove challenging for all of us.
The budget I am submitting recognizes the need to maintain the level of safety services for our
residents, which they have a right to expect as taxpayers and members of this community. We
can provide these vital services only if we have a level of staffing appropriate to meet the
challenges we face.
As of today, there are approximately 78,000 new, approved or approval-pending single-family
homes in various projects in the unincorporated county and the City of Port St. Lucie. As these
homes are occupied over the next few years, we will add 202,000 new residents. That will
represent an increase of 89 percent above the current population of 226,216, as, supplied by the
St. Lucie County Department, of Growth Management.
Because 25,000 ofthe new, approved or approval-pending homes are in the unincorporated area,
that part of our county will experienee-a population increase of 65,000, compared with the
current unincorporated population of71,389, for an increase of91 percent.
In other words, the unincorporated area of our county, where the Sheriffs Office has exclusive
local law enforcement jurisdiction, will grow as rapidly as the county as a whole in the next few
years.
The county's current population of226,216 is 51 percent higher than it was in 1994, at 150,171.
That was the last time the St. Lucie County Sheriffs Office added any Deputies to patrol the
streets ofthe county. Since 1994, the only law enforcement Deputies we have added were School
Resource Deputies and two grant-funded Tra~c Unit Deputies.
As you know, the Sheriffs Office has law enforcement responsibilities throughout the county
and not just in the unincorporated areas. Countywide law enforcement responsibilities include
'-'
~'
ç
....,
The Honorable Frannie Hutchinson, Chairwoman
May 2, 2005
Page 2
service of court papers, both civil and criminal. These responsibilities have increased as our
county's population has increased, and as the number of judges in our county has increased.
In addition to countywide patrol services, the Sheriffs Office staffs and operates a range of
countywide law enforcement services including the A vÌation Unit, Special Investigations Unit
(that investigates crimes involving prescription drug fraud, narcotics, prostitution, illegal
gambling and other vice crimes), Canine Unit, Bomb Squad, Marine Unit and Underwater
Search and Recovery Unit. Also, the Sheriffs Office maintains and operates the county's law
enforcement gun range.
Here are three examples of the increase in the workload of the Sheriffs Office, comparing the
years 2000 and 2004: Our Judicial Services Unit in 2000 processed 59,578 judicial orders,
including civil papers and criminal arrest warrants. In the year 2004, the number of judicial
orders processed by the Sheriffs Office jumped 77 percent, to 105,574. Those booked at the St.
Lucie County jail numbered 11,212 in 2000 and 13,787 in 2004, an increase of23 percent. In
2000, Sheriffs Office detectives investigated 3,229 cases. In 2004, they investigated 3,885 cases,
for an increase of20 percent.
As I explained earlier in this letter, we expect the county's population to nearly double within the
foreseeable future, as people occupy single-family residential homes about to be approved,
already approved and currently under construction. This does not include population increases
anticipated as people occupy multi-family homes approved or under construction.
Clearly, the workload has risen and will continue to rise, but staffing levels have not kept pace,
My proposed budget includes the hiring of25 new law enforcement Deputies. I have secured a
grant that will pay about one-half of the salaries and benefits of 10 of these new Deputies for the
next three years.
Through the partnership between the Sheriffs Office and the Board of County Commissioners, a
Law Enforcement Impact Fee will pay for vehicles and other equipment for the new Deputies.
This is an example of growth helping to pay for the-additional costs associated with it.
Non-sworn employees perfonn a number of important support functions at the Sheriffs Office.
As the population grows, the number of these support positions also must grow. My proposed
budget provides for six new support positions.
The second of the new jail donnitories will be ready for occupancy in the 2005-2006 budget
years. Included in a separate portion of my budget are the costs to staff and operate this facility
The budget I am submitting requests $53,320,578 for the 2005-2006 budget year, not including
costs associated with opening the second new jail dormitory. The proposed budget for the second
jail dornJitory is $2,521,113.
'-'
'-'
....,;
...."
The Honorable Frannie Hutchinson, Chairwoman
May 2, 2005
Page 3
There are great challenges for our community in the years ahead. Together, we can and will meet
these challenges. Our continued commitment to the citizens of S1. Lucie County demands that we
provide a safe environment for them to raise their families, enjoy our beautiful surroundings, and
retire, secure in the knowledge that when they need the services of the Sheriffs Office, we will
answer their call.
Should you have any questions about my budget, my staff and I are always available to answer
them.
Sincerely,/ .'
. --~~_. -
Ken J. Mascara
Sheriff
TB/ts
'-'
-..
U
tJ
BUDGET NOTES
ThL' Sheriff's Office's proposed budget for the 20D5-2006 fisl,;;}1 year cuntains S3,45ì.:F9
in iJ:l:jcasL's mandated by It:gislati\e, ('ontraC!l;a; ;.md rr.a~ktt forces,
In some cases, the mandate is legislative. An example is the increase in the employer-
required contribution rate for the Florida Retirement System. In other cases, the mandate
is contractual. The inmate medical services contract amount increases when the number
of inmates increases. In still other cases, the mandate is market-driven, such as the
increase in the cost of fuel. Yet another mandate is that caused by the county's population
growth over the past decade and the growth anticipated over the next several years (2005-
2006 budget cost). We need additional patrol deputies to provide an appropriate level of
service.
These mandated increases account for 63 percent of the budget increase we are
requesting. To put it another way, without these mandated increases, we would be asking
for a budget increase of 5.67 percent instead of 15.45 percent.
4-
'-'
~
..."
...""
St. Lucie County Sherifrs Office Budget Certificate 200S-2Q06
As required by Chapter 30.49(2)(a), I hereby certify that the proposed expenditures for
Fiscal Year 2005-2006 are reasonable and necessary for the proper and efficient
operation of the 81. Lucie County Sheriff's Office. Further, the functional distribution is
as follows:
16 Judicial 2,654.434
21 Law Enforcement 29,892,602
23 Detention 20,977,541
Total Budget Expenditures
53,524,578
Miscellaneous Revenue
-204,000
Final Adjusted Budget Expenditures
From ad valorum
53,320,578
I
Rcspectfully submitted"
¡;".. .
;- -'7."
// ~"'J
t/..,¿ ,"'" / '. '
/4/ ,,':1{ ,,/ ~~~~,~..... ___~.,
hcn J, ~v1~,scára, Sheriff
- 5 -
'-'
~
l "
W
'J
2005-2006 St. Lucie County Sheriffs Office Proposed Expenditures
Pursuant to FS 30.49(2)(a)
L:--, _,_
Salary of the Sheriff
$128,515
39,400,433
12,580,630
Salaries of deputies and assistants (incI. benefits)
Expenses, other than salaries
Equipment
830,000
Investigations
Total:
85,000
500.000
$53,524,578
Reserve for Contingencies
Expenditures budgeted in the Special Revenue Fund
(grants, joint ventures, etc.)
4,123,850
-6-
5/2/2005
line
II
I
2
3
4
S
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
IS
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
20
31
32
33
34
35
36-¡
37
38
39
40
4)
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
SO
51
52
53
5';
'-'
'-
ST. LUCIE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICF.;
BUDGET REQUEST 2005-2006
ACCOUNT TITLE
'.",J
...,
16000 Judicial
Proposed
2005-2006
512000-Salaries
513000-0ther ILlS Vac/Sick/Long)
Master Deputy Pay
Incentive Pay
5UOOO-Overtime
5UOOO-FICA
521100-FICA Mandatory
526000-BenefitB
534000-Contracted Services
540410-Meals - Per Diem
S4S420-Bonding. Liab , Prop Ins.
S49420-Computer Supplies' Acceas.
S49445-Repaira , Maintenance
S51000-0tfice Supplies
5S2000-Operating Supplies
552100-Batteries
S52490-Equipment under $1000
S527S0-UnHorma
5S27S5-Unitorm Accessories
554100-Educational¡Seminars
554150-Tuition Reimbursement
S6441~-Capital Outlay - Vehicles
564490-Capital Outlay - Other Equip
1,353,028
12,379
4,080
23.160
28,900
88,136
20,612
771,097
295,000
500
31.842
200
500
500
3.500
500
3,000
10.000
500
4,000
3,000
o
o
per.onnel Service. - Judicial
Operating - Judicial
Capital Outlay - Judicial
TOTAL JUDICIAL
21000 Law Enforcement
Sll100-Executive Salary:Sheriff
512000-5alaries Isubtotal)
S13000-0ther ILlS Vac/Sick/Long
Master Deputy Pay
Incentive Pay
Holiday Pay
SHOOD-Overtime
S21000-FICA
S21100-FICA Mandatory
S26000-Benefits
S31000-Profea.ional Services
531430-Atty Fee/Profe..ional Fees
5314'0-Accreditation Costs
534000-Contractural Services
535000-Investigation.
S40000-Travel and Per Diem
S40410-Meal. - Per Diem
-7-
2.301.392
353.042
o
2.654.434
109.238
12,620.316
240.197
22,440
143,280
216,877
502.350
879,901
205.783
6.997.244
80.000
18.000
5.000
80.000
85,000
5.000
15,000
5/212005
line
#I
v
~
ST. LUCIE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
BUDGET REQUEST 1005-2006
ACCOUNT TITLE
5S
56
57
~II
540420-Private Vehicle Allowance
540440-Airlines, Lodging ~ Tolls
541000-Communications
541100-Telepbone
541150-Cellular Phones
541200-PO.t&g8
543000-Utilities
544000-Rentals and Leases
544410-Lea.ed Vebicles
545410-Auto Fleet Insurance
S45420-Bonding, Liab ~ Prop In..
S4'OOO-Tech. Maintenance Contracts
54'410-Auto Repair and Maintenance
54'430-RAdio Rep. ~ Maint
547000-printing and Binding
547420-Copier Supplies
54'100-Advertiaing
54'410-Auto - Otber Charges
SU413 -Towing
54'415-Paint and Lettering
54'420-Computer Suppliea
54'430-Polygrapb
S4'43S-Crime Lab
S4'436-Weapona
S4'44S-Repair ~ Maintenance
S4'450-Phyaical Examinations
5UUO-Aviation
54'470-Marine Repair, Maint, Dock
5S1000-0ffice Suppliea
552000-eperating Suppliea
S5UOO-Batteriea
S52410-Fuel and Lubricants
552420-Ammunition
S52433-Photo Supplies
S52440-0tner Inveatigative Supplies
S524'0-Zquipment Under $1000
5525'0-Photo Equipment
S52700-Jlent",.ar
552750-uniforma
552755-Uniform Accessories
554000-Books. Publ, Sublcr , Member
S54100-Educational Seminars
SS4150-Tu1tion Reimbursement
S54200-Memberahipa
554S00-New.papers
S'4410-Capital OUtlay - Vehicles
5'44'0-Capital OUtlay - Other Equip
571000-Debt Service
581000-Interfund Tranlfers
5""'/CONTINGENCY-L/E
60
61
62
63
64
6S
66
67
68
69
10
11
72
7J
14
7S
16
71
78
79
SO
81
82
83
84
8S
86
81
88
89
90
9\
92
93
94
9'
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
10'
106
\01
\08
PERSONNEL SERVICES LIE
OPERATING - LIE
CAPITAL ASSET - LIE
- 8 -
u
..,
Proposed
2005-2006
1,000
25,000
205,'00
85,000
95 . 000
20,000
155,nnn
80,000
3U.400
397,7"
254,460
232,000
51,891
30.000
5,000
70,175
5,000
10,000
30.000
10,000
122,271
120,300
40.000
15,000
448.155
119,364
35,000
'5.000
25.000
1,440,000
53,000
15,000
5.000
80,000
7,000
5.000
65,000
35.000
15,000
45,000
30,000
12,000
1,000
625.000
150.000
243.409
1.196.151
300,000
:n, 937. '25
6.179,977
775.000
line
tI
109
110
III
112
113
114
IU
116
117
III
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
13 I
132
133
134
IB
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
]49
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
5/2/2005
\w
'-
ST. LUCIE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
BUDGET REQUEST 100S-1006
ACeoWI' TITLE
COm'INGENCY - LIE
TOTAL LAW ENFORCEMENT
23000 DetentioD
512000-Salaries
513000-0ther (LIS Vac/Sick/Long)
Master Deputy Pay
Incenti ve Pay
Holid.ay Pay
514 000 -Overtime
SHOOO-FICA
S21100-FICA MM
525000-Unemployment
526000-Benefits
531000-Profe.sional Services
531410-Hospital/Physieians-Inmate
5314'0-Accreditatlon Costs (Detention)
S34000-Contraetural Sves
540000-Travel . Per Piem
540410-Meal. - Per Diem
540415-Prisoner Transport
540417-Prisoner Transport-Pept Veh.
540440-Airline. Lodging . Tolls
541100-Telephone
541150-Cellular Phones
541200-Postage
543000-Utilities
545420-Bonding. Liab , Prop Insur.
546430-Radio Repair . Maint
546440-0ffiee Equipment R , M
547000-printing and Binding
547420-Copier Supplies
54'100-Advertising
54'420-Computer Supplies
54'U6-Weapons
54'445-Repalr and Maintenance
54'570-Hepatiti. B
55l000-0ffice Supplies
552000-Operating Supplies
552100-Batterie.
5524'0-Equipment Under $1000
552'00-Jail Food
552'10-Jail Supplies
552'20-Jail Paper Goods
552630-Jail Laundry
552640-Jail Janitorial Supplies
552750-Uniforms
552755-Uniform Accessories
554000-Books. Publications' Mag,
-9
_-1
'''wfIÎ
"""
Proposed
2005-2006
2'.892.602
8.684.825
50.341
14.280
62.520
322.770
318.750
585,"2
137.047
10.000
5,103.406
75,000
2.985,611
3,000
50,000
1.000
2,500
130,000
8,000
5.000
42,000
',000
1.500
140,000
2.500
1.000
2,500
8,000
3.000
11,000
'.000
30.000
2,000
12,000
30,000
3,000
10.000
1.185,000
35,000
10.000
40,000
50.000
4.000
1.000
1/2/2005
'-'
~
U
'tJ
ST. LUCIE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE
BUDGET REQUEST 2005-2006
IiDc ACCOtJN1' TI'l'LB Propoled
II 2005-2006
163 554100-Bducat1onal/Seminarl 35.000
164 554150-TUition Reimb. 10.000
6S 554200-Memberlhip. 1.000
166 554900-Training Supplies
167 564000-Cap1tal OUtlay
168 564410-Capital OUtlay - Vehicle. 55.000
169 564490-Cap1tal OUtlay - Other Equip
170 59"'9/CONTINGENCY-CORR 200.000
171
172 PERSONNEL SERVICES - DETEN 15.289.nO
173 OPERATING - DETEH 5. t32. 611
174 CAPITAL OUTLAY - DETEH 55.000
175 CONTINGENCY - DETEN 200.000
176
177 TOTAL DETENTION 20.977.541
178
179
180
181
182 PERSONNEL SERVICES - SHERIFF'S OFFICE 39.528.'48
1S3 OPERATING - SHERIFF'S OFFICE 1:2,6'5. no
184 CAPITAL OUTLAY - SHERIFF'S OFFICE 830.000
18S CONTINGENCY - SHERIFF'S OFFICE 500.000
186
187 TOTAL SHERIFF'S OFFICE BUDGET REQUEST 53.524,578
-10
'-'
...."
'-'
....,,¡
CUEIIAL BOÐGIT COIClAAISON
PERSONNEL SERVICES . SHERIFF'S OFFICI
OPERATING· SHERIFF'S OFFICE
CAPITAL OUTLAY· SHERIFF" OFFICE
CONTR1HGENCY . SHERIF"S OFFICE
not·aos
"'''OYm) ItmGn'
34,62&. n.
10.615,315
no. 61.
300,000
TOTAL SHERIFF'S OFFICI BUDGET
MINUS MISCELLANEAOUS REVENUE
TOTAL AD VALORUM TAX BUDGET IlEQUEST
U,302.U1
-11"1.000
4C.U5,JJ1
TO~AL PERCENT INCREASE FROM PREVIOUS YR:
15.4n
5/2/2005
- 11-
2005-200'
UQITISnD Bl1ÐGrr
39,521. ,..
12."5.'10
830,000
500.000
53,524.578
-204,000
53.320,511
5/./2005
'-'
'-'
Operatin; Costs tor Second Jail '04
Personnel Services
Operating Costs
Capital OUtlay
TOTAL OPBRATING COSTS
- 12-
u
...,
1. "1,113
752,.52
".5U
2,521,113
~
'-
...."
....."
~ ~ I\) 1'> w v.> ~ -~
eft 8 01 0 eft 0 (n 0 t11
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.....-.- -'._-~-_..._--------- --_....
I\)
o
c>
o
(,.)
N
to..>
CO
tv
o
o
+>-
(.oJ
(XI
(XI
U1
c
(
-
(
n
~
<
(
n
OJ
'"
ctI
IP
'-'
~
o
to.)
_0
8
o
.þ.
.0
8
o
..-.-........-..-----..-... ._~....'..........._,._-..._--_.
tv
o
o
o
N
o
o
~
0)
.0
o
o
o
01
U)
(,.
....
co
. _' .. _.._......__..._..ø..__.. ... _."
------.-.--
. 14
\J
"""
co
o
o
o
o
~
o
o
o
o
o
-.....----.....---..
..a.
o
01
01
~
~
tv
o
o
o
o
to.
C
a.
CQ
CD
CII.
o
a.
CD
üJ
"'0
o
n
CD
CII
tit
CD
a.
-< IV
(1) 0
~ C>
., tv
'-'
..J
,..",
~
---------.--..--......
# of Arrests
o
tV
o
o
a
J::o.
o
o
o
.....
p
o
o
o
.....
J::o.
C>
C>
o
p1
o
o
o
ex>
C>
C>
o
.....
f\.')
o
o
o
N
o
o
o
I ; ; .------,-'---.-- ~--'-----'-f -'--------f _. ..-.,..-..... -
i I ! ¡ I !
i
I
!
¡....... !
i..... I
~ I
'0) I
'tV
!w ¡
i I
-¡ I
! I
;
I i ;
, I
I I
I I
¡ I
.....
I\J
0
.....
::..
!
I
: I
.....
W
to
'J
~
,
I !
:
: ;
; I i I
I I
I I ,
I
I I
-
------ 1 I I
IV
o
o
.....
I\J
8
w
I\J
8
J::o.
t
o
-i
o
-
~
~
-,
CD
rn
-
rn
.n._·_._.._..__."_...
....
en
o
o
o
.....
Q)
Q)
f\)
(J)
.....
(J)
ex>
~
o
-"
.œ
o
o
o
....(,
o
5r
}>
-,
-,
ro
(/
-
\it
u
'-'
u
...,
... ~ -"
I\) ~ 0) ()) 0 N ~ 0>
0 0 0 (:) 0 0 0 C)
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
_._-~,.~.,_.~.....
N
o
o
o
I\)
§
·
·
N
·
N
.
W
.....,
Q)
.....,
<-
S»
-.
-
m
o
o
;::.:-
-.
::::J
to
en
\..-
....J
~
..",
-... -... I\) f\) úJ úJ ~ ~
(J' 0 (J' 0 01 0 01 0 c.n
p p 0 0 .0 .0 0 .0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
".".., -.....---- - -----_....__..~..---- ..-... '.----....-...,
I
I
i
...
... <.n
<D .0
<D ...
~ ......
...
I
I en
I r"
r-
I c
I 0
CD
0
0
c
::s
N ~
I\) ~
0 en "U
0 N 0
~ ... "C
en C
¡r
:t
0
::s
-
-
0
~
CD -
(J) CD
CD fJI ~
CD !Z, N
Q) 3 co
2: Q) N
CD éi) ...
- 0.. en
c: ~-
...
c:
~
CD
I
i
17
--..,,-.,...._"~....,-~.~-
'-'
.
....,
'-;
....-I(
;
Agenda Item
#9
Douglas Anderson - Budget Items
ra'ar~~.;u:~~~.13~~"""~1Ð$!'~~r~:"i·¡M.:::l:2::t;z.~~~J"'~~;t~1~:;~;'~VBJ;}"3::J((~.U;~~~:""ro~~1A-<.l!'1'J;.\~..c.v,.~~l=.Jt¡.t~:JL;.
From:
To:
Date:
Subject:
"Katie Johnson" <katiej@electro-net.com>
<douga@stlucieco.gov>
5/4/2005 12:22:13 PM
Budget Items
--....- -.--....., ·.·___.__.__._____a'___ ~_. ·_··,·~____.a__"_.__.___.______...._ .__ _._~._.__.... .~__.__..__._____.__._ _..._ ._.__H_..~.__......... ~~_ _....~._. ._..._.. ..~~._ ~'a'u__... ~...
Doug:
Below is a summary of St. Lucie's budget items included in the 2005 - 2006 Appropriation's Act:
· Special Need Shelter - $2.5 Million
· Treasure Coast Regional Biosolids Facility - $2 Million
· South 26th Street Sanitary Collection - $750,000
We will provide you with an updated bill tracking list upon sine die and a detailed Final Report in the weeks
ahead,
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have any questions.
Katie Johnson
Government Consultant
Ronald L. Book, P.A.
(850) 224-3427
~ v~
~\l,\ &(¡ yJ
C" ~ ~\!,() S
~l~ kG
fJ f'ó
~;t
,... "-'-
~
....,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mr. Douglas Anderson
County Administrator
I
~)I~I ~èk
(\' f11lf.J 0 &
v' V Jlf ~ ~ ÑI
f,1r.VI'
f,t!
FROM:
DATE:
May 18,2005
SUBJECT: CITIZEN'S BUDGET COMMlTI'EE REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Attached are estimates for the ratios for Law Enforcement and Correctional officers currently
employed by the S1. Lucie County Sheriff's Office. As requested by the Citizen's Budget
Committee, the ratios for Correctional officers, per inmate, are attached, and contain information
concerning surrounding counties, as well as Alachua County Florida.
Should you have any further requests for this information, please feel tree to contact me.
Jhc
~
...,;
Ratio of Law Enforcement Officers to 1,000 Population
2004 County Population Estimate
226,816
Number of Deputies
154
Deputies per 1000
0.679
All Law Enforcement
Sheriff 154
Port S1. Lucie 149
F1. Pierce 102
405
Number of Law Enforcement per 1000 1.79
'-'
....,
Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 2002, page 9Q
Table 1,94
Number of jails. rated capacity, percent of capacity occupied, and number of Inmates per employee
By region and Jurisdiction, June 30, 1999
Percent Number of inmates
of rated per employeeC
Number Rated capacity Total Correctional
Region and jurisdiction of jails capacity- occupied" staff officers
United States, total 3,376 660,361 93% 2,9 4,4
Federal 11 8.040 139 3,6 6,7
State 3,365 652,321 93 2,9 4,3
Northeast 227 97,794 93 2,2 2,9
Maine 15 1,220 91 1,4 1,8
Massachusetts 21 9,978 108 2,3 3,6
New Hampshire 10 1,812 B8 2,9 3,8
New Jersey 24 15,349 110 3,0 3,7
New York 81 39,904 B4 1,5 2,0
Pennsylvania 76 29,531 91 3,2 4,5
Midwest 977 108.261 90 2,5 4,2
Illinois 93 19,069 89 2,7 8,1
Indiana 93 12,553 102 2,7 5,9
Iowa 94 3,125 96 1,8 2,5
Kansas 97 5,565 79 2,1 3,1
Michigan 93 16,661 94 3,2 4,9
Minnesota 78 5,970 84 1,8 2,8
Missouri 129 8,924 78 2,1 3,2
Nebraska 65 2,728 80 1,8 2,6
North Dakota 23 918 64 1,7 2,2
Ohio 108 17,219 97 2,3 3,3
South Dakota 31 1,623 66 2,2 3,1
Wisconsin 73 13,906 90 3,5 4,8
South 1,623 308,234 92 3,3 4,6
Alabama 155 11,600 98 3,7 5,6
Arkansas 87 6,122 79 2,6 3,5
District of Columbia 1 1,378 120 2,4 2,8
Florida 108 55,493 92 3,3 4,6
Georgia 204 36.213 91 3,9 5,3
Kentucky 82 9,915 105 3,7 4,9
Louisiana 107 27.544 93 3,8 6,0
Maryland 29 11,821 93 2,6 3,6
Mississippi 102 9,778 91 3,8 5,9
North Carolina 104 15.456 86 2,9 4,3
Oklahoma 102 7,663 88 3,3 4,6
South Carolina 52 9,115 96 3,4 4,4
Tennessee 108 21,572 91 3,1 4,4
T exes 271 66,521 87 3,5 4,5
Virginia 82 15,514 118 2,4 3,3
West Virginia 29 2.529 99 3,1 4,3
West 538 138.032 96 3,3 5,7
Alaska 15 160 43 0,6 1,8
Arizona 28 12,629 82 3,3 4,7
Camomia 145 75,088 103 3,8 7,2
Colorado 61 9,151 98 2,4 3,2
Idaho 41 3,203 88 3,3 5,7
Montana 42 1,791 85 2,0 3,2
Navada 21 5.436 90 2,5 4,2
New Mexico 34 6.258 83 2,9 5,9
Oregon 41 7,210 87 2,6 3,8
Utah 26 5,904 68 3,1 7,3
Washington 62 10.004 105 3,6 5,1
Wyoming 22 1,198 84 2,4 3.4
Note: These data are from the 1999 Census of Jails conducted for the U,S, Department
of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics by the U,S, Cansus Bureau, The 1999 census
ineluded all locally administered jails that held inmates beyond arraignment (usually more
than 72 hours) and were staffed by municipal or county employees, Exeluded from the
census were physically separate temporary holding facilities, such as drunk tanks and
police lockups. that do not hold persons after they are formally charged in court. Also
exeluded were Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii. Rhode Island. and Vermont because
these jurisdictions have State-operated integrated jaiVprison systems, Alaska also was
exeluded for this reason. however, 15 independently operated jails in Alaska were
inciudad, For additional Information on the Census of Jails, see Appendix 4,
-Rated capacity is the number of beds or inmates assi'gned by a rating official to facilities
within each jurisdiction,
"The number of inmates divided by rated capacity times 100,
Clnmate-ta-staff ratios were calculated by dividing the number of confined inmates by the
number of employees on June 30, 1999,
Source: U,S, Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Census of Jails. 1999,
NCJ 186633 (Washington, DC: U,S, Department of Justice, 2001), pp, 14,28, Teble
adapted by SOURCEBOOK staff,
/('
~
1V
Table 1a - continued '-' ..",¡
}:I,JII.:!il11e~~qyi1es. 200~ Officers assigned City or Officers Percent change in
_Sworn officers ~esponQ.J~~alls county per 1 O.OOO~ployees.....1~~~ººº-_
C;QIJ!!IY_____, _~am~f1!g~r1cy _____ Total Number Percent Number Percent p.2¡Julation residents Total Sworn Civilian
FLORIDA (cont)
Leon Leon County Sheriff 654 285 44 % 117 41 % 239.452 12 7% (38)°!c 138 %
Leon Tallahassee Police 457 321 70 154 48 150.624 21 (5) (3) (9)
Manatee Manatee County Sheriff 964 361 37 239 66 264,002 14 19 (34) 131
Marion Marion County Sheriff 689 277 40 150 54 258,916 11 9 20 2
Marion Ocala Police 227 149 66 76 51 45,943 32 13 10 20
Martin Martin County Sheriff 500 203 41 83 41 126.731 16 5 (45) 170
Miami-Dade Miami-Dade Police 4.306 3.008 70 1554 52 2.253,362 13 (3) 6 (21)
Miami-Dade Coral Gables Police 238 164 69 141 86 42,249 39 12 7 23
Miami-Dade Hialeah Police 443 333 75 135 41 226.419 15 (2) 5 (19)
Miami-Dade Miami Police 1 .487 1,110 75 684 62 362.470 31 19 10 58
Miami-Dade Miami Beach Police 538 376 70 170 45 87.933 43 (2) (1) (4)
Miami-Dade North Miami Police 163 120 74 65 54 59.880 20 (8) 2 (28)
Miami-Dade North Miami Beach Police 152 102 67 45 44 40.786 25 (6) 10 (26)
Monroe Monroe County Sheriff 503 193 38 113 59 79.589 24 (5) 10 (13)
Okaloosa Okaloosa County Sheriff 271 205 76 140 68 170.498 12 44 34 89
Orange Orange County Sheriff 1,792 1,211 68 429 35 896,344 14 23 24 21
Orange Orlando Police 919 647 70 346 53 185.951 35 9 '9 9
Osceola Osceola County Sheriff 404 257 64 140 54 172.493 15 (11 ) 10 (33)
Palm Beach Palm Beach County Sheriff 2.743 1,074 39 668 62 1,131.184 9 13 (34) 109
Palm Beach Boca Raton Police 225 149 66 72 48 74.764 20 1 9 (11 )
Palm Beach Boynton Beach Police 178 135 76 90 67 60.389 22 10 2 43
Palm Beach Delray Beach Police 218 144 66 91 63 60.020 24 (5) (8) 1
Palm Beach Riviera Beach Police 140 102 73 80 78 29,884 34 41 3 x
Palm Beach West Palm Beach Police 371 255 69 209 82 82,103 31 6 9 (1)
Pasco Pasco County Sheriff 876 374 43 188 50 344,765 11 15 23 10
Pinellas Pinellas County Sheriff 2,391 860 36 354 41 921.482 9 19 23 16
Pinellas Clearwater Police 411 252 61 188 75 108,787 23 9 0 27
Pinellas Largo Police 178 123 69 85 69 69,371 18 0 (7) 20
Pinellas St Petersburg Police 723 500 69 345 69 248,232 20 2 (1) 8
Polk Polk County Sheriff 1.348 511 38 278 54 483.924 11 20 17 23
Polk Lakeland Police 350 234 67 184 79 78.452 30 3 13 (13)
Putnam Putnam County Sheriff 201 151 75 56 37 70.423 21 (4) 35 (49)
StJohns St Johns County Sheriff 432 272 63 138 51 123,135 22 29 86 (16)
&1 Lucie St Lucie County Sheriff 457 217 47 97 45 192,695 11 (1 ) 4 (6)
St Lucie Fort Pierce Police 146 108 74 55 51 37,516 29 10 2 41
St Lucie Port St Lucie Police 186 133 72 81 61 88,769 15 15 19 6
Santa Rosa Santa Rosa County Sheriff 314 137 44 99 72 117,743 12 33 27 38
Sarasota Sarasota County Sheriff 884 393 44 129 33 325.957 12 15 16 14
Sarasota Sarasota Police 267 200 75 166 83 52.715 38 3 6 (6)
Seminole Seminole County Sheriff 738 304 41 159 52 365.196 8 23 17 28
Seminole Altamonte Springs Police 153 101 66 51 50 41.200 25 14 9 27
Vol usia Vol usia County Sheriff 577 384 67 268 70 443.343 9 7 10 2
Vol usia Daytona Beach Police 346 249 72 181 73 64.112 39 12 11 14
GEORGIA
Bartow Bartow County Sheriff 192 128 67 44 34 76.019 17 7 (6) 45
Bibb Bibb County Sheriff 264 226 86 65 29 153.887 15 (1) (4) 15
Bibb Macon Police 375 286 76 181 63 97,255 29 13 (5) 187
Chatham Chatham County Police 220 127 58 56 44 232,048 5 (8) (15) 4
Chatham Savannah Police 478 385 81 208 54 131.510 29 (6) (7) 0
Cherokee Cherokee County Sheriff 220 185 84 73 39 141.903 13 7 18 (27)
Clarke Athens-Clarke County Police 253 200 79 158 79 101,489 20 0 1 (2)
Clayton Clayton County Police 242 216 89 155 72 236,517 9 0 1 (4)
Cobb Cobb County Police 562 507 90 310 61 607.751 8 (11 ) 12 (70)
Cobb Marietta Police 166 138 83 98 71 58,748 23 14 13 17
Columbia Columbia County Sheriff 234 132 56 60 45 89.288 15 34 (8) 219
De Kalb De Kalb County Police 975 734 75 538 73 665,865 11 16 (1 ) 141
Dougherty Albany Police 239 210 88 123 59 76,939 27 0 (1 ) 12
Douglas Douglas County Sheriff 279 199 71 70 35 92,174 22 37 39 31
Forsyth Forsyth County Sheriff 195 134 69 128 96 98.407 14 86 81 97
Fulton Fulton County Police 334 268 80 187 70 816,006 3 (18) 2 (54)
Fulton Atlanta Police 1.984 1.474 74 1116 76 416.474 35 2 0 9
Fulton East Point Police 165 117 71 54 46 39,595 30 18 9 45
Fulton Roswell Police 187 126 67 74 59 79,334 16 23 34 5
Glynn Glynn County Police 133 108 81 66 61 67.568 16 6 9 (7)
Gwinnett Gwinnett County Police 664 471 71 300 64 588.448 8 17 20 9
Hall Hall County Sheriff 282 196 70 85 43 139.277 14 10 (5) 69
Muscogee Muscogee County Sheriff 265 138 52 51 37 186.291 7 16 15 18
Muscogee Columbus Police 467 370 79 278 75 186.291 20 (5) (5) (7)
Richmond Augusta-Richmond Co Sheriff 747 535 72 332 62 199,775 27 23 11 71
i 4 Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics, 2000
'-'
..."
Number of Inmates per Employee
Indian River County Sheriff's Office
Number of Certified Staff
Number of Civilian Staff
103
22
Average Daily Inmate Population
600
N umber of Inmates per Correctional Officer
Number of Inmates All Employees
5.8
4.8
Martin County Sheriff's Office
Number of Certified Staff
Number of Civilian Staff
132
33
Average Daily Inmate Population
601
N umber of Inmates per Correctional Officer
Number of Inmates All Employees
4.5
3.7
'-'
"""'"
Number of Inmates per Emplovee (Cont.)
Alachua Countv Sheriff's Office
Number of Certified Staff
207
Number of Civilian Staff
76
Average Daily Inmate population
930
Number of Inmates per Correction Officer
4.4
N umber of Inmates All Employees
3.2
St. Lucie Countv Sheriff's Office
Number of Certified Staff
200
Number of Civilian Staff
19
Average Daily Inmate population
1160
Number of Inmates per Correction Officer
5.8
Number of Inmates All Employees
5.2
~
..,
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Mr. Douglas Anderson
County Administrator
I
~),~Ih~
'0'· Yß .R,~o é f'\
Y r r(ø')
FROM:
Garry Wils n
Chief Depu
DATE:
May 18, 2005
SUBJECT: CITIZEN'S BUDGET COMMITIEE REQUEST FOR INFORMATION
Attached are estimates for the ratios for Law Enforcement and Correctional officers currently
employed by the S1. Lucie County Sheriff's Office. As requested by the Citizen's Budget
Committee, the ratios for Correctional officers, per inmate, are attached, and contain infonnation
concerning surrounding counties, as well as Alachua County Florida.
Should you have any further requests for this infonnation, please feel :tree to contact me.
Thc
I· '
tl_- Y ¡ 9 ? ~.
¡
. : '\ j '-'-'\ >--" r- ; .~~" t_
ea. ,I, (c-'f''' .,_1
-----'~-~-~:_..~~~
"'"
..."
Ratio of Law Enforcement Officers to 1 ,000 Population
2004 County Population Estimate
226,816
Number of Deputies
154
Deputies per 1 000
0.679
All Law Enforcement
Sheriff 154
Port St. Lucie 149
Ft. Pierce 102
405
Number of Law Enforcement per 1000 1.79
'--
"wII
Sourcebook of Criminal Justice Statistics 2002, page 90
Table 1,94
Number of jails. rated capacity. percent of capacity occupied. and number of Inmates per employee
By region and jurisdiction, June 30, 1999
Percent Number of inmates
of rated per employee'
Number Rated capacity Total Correctional
Region and jurisdiction of jails capacity" occupiedb staff officers
United States, total 3,376 660,361 93% 2,9 4.4
Federal 11 6.040 139 3,6 6,7
State 3.365 652,321 93 2,9 4,3
Northeast 227 97,794 93 2,2 2,9
Maine 15 1,220 91 1.4 1,8
Massachusetts 21 9,978 108 2,3 3,6
New Hampshire 10 1,812 88 2,9 3,8
New Jersey 24 15,349 110 3,0 3,7
New Yorl< 81 39,904 84 1,5 2,0
Pennsylvania 76 29,531 91 3,2 4,5
Midwest 977 108,261 90 2,5 4,2
Illinois 93 19,069 89 2,7 8,1
Indiana 93 12,553 102 2,7 5,9
Iowa 94 3,125 96 1,8 2,5
Kansas 97 5,565 79 2,1 3,1
Michigan 93 16,661 94 3,2 4,9
Minnesota 78 5,970 84 1,8 2,8
Missouri 129 8,924 78 2,1 3,2
Nebraska 65 2,728 80 1,8 2,6
North Dakota 23 918 64 1,7 2,2
Ohio 108 17,219 97 2,3 3,3
South Dakota 31 1,623 66 2,2 3,1
Wisconsin 73 13,906 90 3,5 4,8
South 1,623 308,234 92 3,3 4,6
Alabama 155 11,600 98 3,7 5,6
Arkansas 87 6,122 79 2,6 3,5
District of Columbia 1 1,378 120 2,4 2,8
Florida 108 55.493 92 3,3 4,6
Georgia 204 36,213 91 3,9 5,3
Kentucky 82 9,915 105 3,7 4,9
Louisiana 107 27.544 93 3,8 6,0
Marytand 29 11,821 93 2,6 3,6
Mississippi 102 9,778 91 3,8 5,9
North Carolina 104 15.456 86 2,9 4,3
Oklahoma 102 7,663 88 3,3 4,6
South Carolina 52 9,115 96 3.4 4.4
Tennessee 108 21,572 91 3,1 4,4
Texas 271 66,521 87 3,5 4,5
Virginia 82 15,514 118 2,4 3,3
West Virginia 29 2,529 99 3,1 4,3
West 538 138,032 96 3,3 5,7
Alaska 15 160 43 0,6 1,8
Arizona 28 12,629 82 3,3 4,7
Cal~ornia 145 75,088 103 3,8 7,2
Colorado 61 9,151 98 2,4 3,2
Idaho 41 3,203 88 3,3 5,7
Montana 42 1,791 85 2,0 3,2
Nevada 21 5.436 90 2,5 4,2
New Mexico 34 6,258 83 2,9 5,9
Oregon 41 7,210 87 2,6 3,8
Utah 26 5,904 68 3,1 7,3
Washington 62 10,004 105 3,6 5,1
Wyoming 22 1,198 84 2,4 3.4
Note: These data are from the 1999 Census of Jails conducted for the U,S, Department
of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics by the U,S, Census Bureau, The 1999 census
included all locally administered jails that held inmates beyond arraignment (usually more
than 72 hours) and were staffed by municipal or county employees, Excluded from the
census were physically separate temporary holding facilities, such as drunk tanks and
police lockups, that do not hold persons after they are formally charged in court, Also
excluded were Connecticut, Delaware. Hawaii, Rhode Island, and Vermont because
these jurisdictions have State-operated integrated jaiUprison systems, Alaska also was
excluded for this reason, however, 15 independently operated Jails in Alaska were
included, For additional information on the Census of Jails, see Appendix 4,
8Rated capacity is the number of beds or inmates ass¡'gned by a rating official to facilities
within each jurisdiction.
"rhe number of inmates divided by rated capacity times 100,
'Inmate-te-staff ratios were calculated by dividing the number of confined inmates by the
number of employees on June 30, 1999,
Source: U,S, Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics, Census of Jails, 1999,
NCJ 186633 (Washington. DC: U,S, Department of Justice, 2001), pp, 14,28, Table
adapted by SOURCEBOOK staff,
/i
~
1V
Table 1 a - continued
CounlY
FLORIDA (cant)
Leon
Leon
Manatee
Marion
Marion
Martin
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Miami-Dade
Monroe
Okaloosa
Orange
Orange
Osceola
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Palm Beach
Pasco
Pinellas
Pine lias
Pinellas
Pinellas
Polk
Polk
Putnam
StJohns
St Lucie
St Lucie
St Lucie
Santa Rosa
Sarasota
Sarasota
Seminole
Seminole
Vol usia
Volusia
GEORGIA
Bartow
Bibb
Bibb
Chatham
Chatham
Cherokee
Clarke
Clayton
Cobb
Cobb
Columbia
De Kalb
Dougherty
Douglas
Forsyth
Fulton
Fulton
Fulton
Fulton
Glynn
Gwinnett
Hall
Muscogee
Muscogee
Richmond
. .JIJ--ª.rn e..of agency..........
Leon County Sheriff
Tallahassee Police
Manatee County Sheriff
Marion County Sheriff
Ocala Police
Martin County Sheriff
Miami-Dade Police
Coral Gables Police
Hialeah Police
Miami Police
Miami Beach Police
North Miami Police
North Miami Beach Police
Monroe County Sheriff
Okaloosa County Sheriff
Orange County Sheriff
Orlando Police
Osceola County Sheriff
Palm Beach County Sheriff
Boca Raton Police
Boynton Beach Police
Delray Beach Police
Riviera Beach Police
West Palm Beach Police
Pasco County Sheriff
Pinellas County Sheriff
Clearwater Police
Largo Police
St Petersburg Police
Polk County Sheriff
Lakeland Police
Putnam County Sheriff
St Johns County Sheriff
St Lucie County Sheriff
Fort Pierce Police
Port St Lucie Police
Santa Rosa County Sheriff
Sarasota County Sheriff
Sarasota Police
Seminole County Sheriff
Altamonte Springs Police
Volusia County Sheriff
Daytona Beach Police
Bartow County Sheriff
Bibb County Sheriff
Macon Police
Chatham County Police
Savannah Police
Cherokee County Sheriff
Athens-Clarke County Police
Clayton County Police
Cobb County Police
Marietta Police
Columbia County Sheriff
De Kalb County Police
Albany Police
Douglas County Sheriff
Forsyth County Sheriff
Fulton County Police
Atlanta Police
East Point Police
Roswell Police
Glynn County Police
Gwinnett County Police
Hall County Sheriff
Muscogee County Sheriff
Columbus Police
Augusta-Richmond Co Sheriff
"'"
-'
Full-time employees, 2000. Officers assigned City or Officers Percent change in
.. . .-.-. Sworn officers to respond to calls county per 1 0.000 ~rnJIQyees,199§-?0º0 .
Total t'{ui!l.6~=j>ercin(.1\J.ul-nber--f5.erc~nt=_p.2pulation!esic!~nt~__.Io-'~LJ3~Qr'!. Civilian
654
457
964
689
227
500
4,306
238
443
1 ,487
538
163
152
503
271
1,792
919
404
2.743
225
178
218
140
371
876
2,391
411
178
723
1,348
350
201
432
457
146
186
314
884
267
738
153
577
346
192
264
375
220
478
220
253
242
562
166
234
975
239
279
195
334
1,984
165
187
133
664
282
265
467
747
285
321
361
277
149
203
3,008
164
333
1,110
376
120
102
193
205
1,211
647
257
1,074
149
135
144
102
255
374
860
252
123
500
511
234
151
272
217
108
133
137
393
200
304
101
384
249
128
226
286
127
385
185
200
216
507
138
132
734
210
199
134
268
1,474
117
126
108
471
196
138
370
535
4 Law Enforcement Management and Administrative Statistics. 2000
44 %
70
37
40
66
41
70
69
75
75
70
74
67
38
76
68
70
64
39
66
76
66
73
69
43
36
61
69
69
38
67
75
63
47
74
72
44
44
75
41
66
67
72
67
86
76
58
81
84
79
89
90
83
56
75
88
71
69
80
74
71
67
81
71
70
52
79
72
117
154
239
150
76
83
1554
141
135
684
170
65
45
113
140
429
346
140
668
72
90
91
80
209
188
354
188
85
345
278
184
56
138
97
55
81
99
129
166
159
51
268
181
44
65
181
56
208
73
158
155
310
98
60
538
123
70
128
187
1116
54
74
66
300
85
51
278
332
41 0/,
48
66
54
51
41
52
86
41
62
45
54
44
59
68
35
53
54
62
48
67
63
78
82
50
41
75
69
69
54
79
37
51
45
51
61
72
33
83
52
50
70
73
34
29
63
44
54
39
79
72
61
71
45
73
59
35
96
70
76
46
59
61
64
43
37
75
62
239,452
150,624
264,002
258,916
415,943
12¡¡.731
2,25,,362
4~~.249
226,419
36~~,4 70
8i',933
5Ø,880
40.786
79,589
170,498
89€i,344
185>,951
172,493
1,131,184
74.764
60,389
60,020
29,884
82,103
344,765
921,482
108,787
69,371
248.232
483,924
78,452
70,423
123,135
192,695
37,516
88,769
117,743
325,957
52,715
365,196
41,.200
443,.343
64,112
76,019
153,887
97.255
232,048
131,510
141,903
101,489
236.517
607.751
58.748
89,288
665,865
76,939
92.174
98,407
816,006
416,474
39,595
79,334
67.568
588,448
139,:277
186.:291
186,291
199,775
17
15
29
5
29
13
20
9
8
23
15
11
27
22
14
3
35
30
16
16
8
14
7
20
27
12
21
14
11
32
16
13
39
15
31
43
20
25
24
12
14
35
15
9
20
22
24
34
31
11
9
23
18
20
11
30
21
22
11
29
15
12
12
38
8
25
9
39
7 %
(5)
19
9
13
5
(3)
12
(2)
19
(2)
(8)
(6)
(5)
44
23
9
(11 )
13
1
10
(5)
41
6
15
19
9
o
2
20
3
(4)
29
(1 )
10
15
33
15
3
23
14
7
12
7
(1)
13
(8)
(6)
7
o
o
(11)
14
34
16
o
37
86
(18)
2
18
23
6
17
10
16
(5)
23
(38)%
(3)
(34)
20
10
(45)
6
7
5
10
(1 )
2
10
10
34
24
'9
10
(34)
9
2
(8)
3
9
23
23
o
(7)
(1)
17
13
35
86
4
2
19
27
16
6
17
9
10
11
(6)
(4)
(5)
(15)
(7)
18
1
1
12
13
(8)
(1 )
(1 )
39
81
2
o
9
34
9
20
(5)
15
(5)
11
138 %
(9)
131
2
20
170
(21)
23
(19)
58
(4)
(28)
(26)
(13)
89
21
9
(33)
109
(11)
43
1
x
(1)
10
16
27
20
8
23
(13)
(49)
(16)
(6)
41
6
38
14
(6)
28
27
2
14
45
15
187
4
o
(27)
(2)
(4)
(70)
17
219
141
12
31
97
(54)
9
45
5
(7)
9
69
18
(7)
71
~
...,,'
Number of Inmates per Employee
Indian River County Sheriff's Office
Number of Certified Staff
Number of Civilian Staff
103
22
Average Daily Inmate Population
600
Number of Inmates per Correctional Officer
N umber of Inmates All Employees
5.8
4.8
Martin County Sheriff's Office
Number of Certified Staff
Number of Civilian Staff
132
33
Average Daily Inmate Population
601
Number of Inmates per Correctional Officer
Number of Inmates All Employees
4.5
3.7
;;
"-'
."",
Number of Inmates per Emplovee (Cont.)
Alachua County Sheriff's Office
Number of Certified Staff
207
Number of Civilian Staff
76
Average Daily Inmate Population
930
Number of Inmates per Correction Officer
4.4
Number of Inmates All Employees
3.2
St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office
Number of Certified Staff
200
Number of Civilian Staff
19
Average Daily Inmate Population
1160
Number of Inmates per Correction Officer
5.8
Number of Inmates All Employees
5.2
!!,porter
~t
ýI'
.~~
~r/M e; ~CC-J .
J!2~'
~//1
rag\:' 1 VI 1
From:
To:
Sent:
Subject:
"Donald Cooper" <DonC@cityofpsl.com>
"Robert Minsky" <rminsky@hotmail.com>
Tuesday, May 17, 2005 8:17 AM
Re: Same as before except with the attachment
He said repeatly that they had bonded the money. Technically that is not correct, They have
pledged non-ad valorum revenues and then are using the impact to actually pay the debt. They
should be able to use those non ad-valorum revenues to pay the debt if' they lose the impact
fees. But I suspect they have spent those funds or over committed them in some way which is
why they must have the impact fees. They proably have significant disclosure issues.
Yesterday's action by the CC is a material event which alone would require notification to their
bond holders. Anderson also said they are using impact fees fo~ O&M purposes\vhich is an
improper use of the funds. That may be where much of the impacts have gone to.
»> "Robert Minsky" <rminsky@hotmail.com> 05/17/057:53 AM »>
The new improved version.
Bob
Find e-mail and documents on your PC instantly with the new MSN Search Toolbar*FREE!
~ ..t:
#?
~o r' ç /
,--' f7D'" J
j?O ¿,--... r
ûÞ".,,,.I'/ LfJ ~
YtJ ~ ~> /?--
~/ tftfr/ M')
Ç)'¡ /"Î /011/1
¿/ . 1- £~p,µb)'·"J.
t/J/.,,~
+.
5/17/2005
.~
'-'
""""
!
1.
1.1
1.2
2.
2.1
3.
4.1
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
Agenda
Friday, April 16, 2004
7:30 a.m., Conference Room # 3
St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex
Convene meeting
Roll Call, announcements
Minutes
~~"l'i / /7
~ 0'#1 (" i
IV . r t
~ V If r~
, If ~
r/\ ~ ~.
~') )
9
Old Business
Update on SLC Utilities
Adjournment
Next CBC meeting: May 21, 2004
~
..."
Draft
t
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITIEE
Meeting Date: March 19,2004
SLC Landfill's Conf. Room
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
David F. Samuel, Kenny Hogan, Ron Parrish, William "Bill"Casey, John Knapp,
Debbie Hawley, Edward Lounds, Steven Messer, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick, Carl Hensley,
Linda Bartz.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Mark Taynton, Paul Young and Sylvie Kramer.
OTHERS PRESENT: Roger Shinn, Ed Parker, Barbara Churchill, Don West, Ray Wazny, Jennifer Hill,
Doug Anderson and Marie Gouin.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
Please notice below, some items discussed were not in the original agenda: SLC Utilities, Research
Park and Methane Gas from Landfill.
MEETING MINUTES
Ron pointed out that under the tittle "Fort Pierce annexation policy" the minutes, should read:
"The City Commission has taken off the table pursuing annexation...". Staff took note of the
corrections.
There being no further corrections to the minutes for the February 20, 2004 meeting, David
moved for approval and Linda seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and
the motion passed.
SLC Utilities
John Knapp inquired about Exhibit A (map) included in March meeting's minutes, which shows
Fort Pierce Utilities Authority's proposed service area, according to the Inter-local Agreement with
the County.
Doug briefly explained what each of the colored areas mean and proposed that staff can bring at
the next meeting a detailed map of the County's water and sewer lines, which is almost finalized,
for their review. This map will also show the estimated cost of each area (Overall, the estimated
cost of the first phase of the project is approximately $15MM).
CBC members and staff discussed some of the details in the map and agreed to bring back this
subject to the next meeting, for further discussion.
Research Education Park
Doug stated staff will request BOCC authorization to get a $1 OMM line of credit to purchase land
for this project. A contract has been signed with property owners, contingent on financing.
Committee members and staff discussed details of the purchase of the properties available, as well
as financing, agencies and institutes interested in participating, the support of State
representatives, etc.
.."
~
Methane Gas from the SLC Landfill
Tropicana has expressed interest in buying methane gas produced by the SLC Landfill. They had
proposed a 45 years commitment, but County Attorney's office does not recommend having a
commitment for such a long period of time (they recommend 20 years). Staff is still working on
the details of this issue and will come back to this committee with an update.
Joint Meetine: with the Cities
There is a task force being established to work with the School District to finance their future
construction projects. Councilman Jack Kelly (City Port St. Lucie) is heading it and have asked
for Commissioner Barnes (District V) to represent the County (he is out of town and, as to the date
of this meeting, we do not have an answer as to if he will accept).
CBC members and staff discussed the importance of the funding for schools.
Jail Pods Construction
The original cost of construction of this project was estimated at approximately $16MM, but due
to the price of steel increasing dramatically in these recent months, the new estimated cost is
closer to $18MM, because of the amount of steel required for this kind of building (e.g. structural
reinforcements and details like cell bars and doors).
CBC members and staff discussed aspects of this matter, such as what is being done to prevent
other contingencies this project could bring, as well as future expansions to the jail.
Doug also commended the outstanding work Chief Judge Angelos and the other judges have been
doing to process the pending cases promptly and efficiently, to keep the capacity of jail population
under the maximum allowed by federal requirements.
5 Year CaÐital Plan
Staff provided copies to CBC members of the lists of Capital Projects and Doug pointed out the
amounts budgeted for this Fiscal Year by department and encouraged committee members to
review it and come back with their comments and ideas, which are always very useful to staff.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC meeting will be held on Friday, April 16, 2004 at 7:30 a.m., in Conference Room #
3 of the St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex. Topics to be discussed will include
details of the SLC Utilities System.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 8:20 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
William "Bill" Casey, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
March 19,2004
H:IO Secretary\O OMB\CBCIMin\03'19,wpd
page 2
-
-
'-' '-"
....., -.J
~'
1.
1.1
1.2
2.
2.1
2.2
3.
4.1
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
Agenda
Friday, Apri116, 2004 .
7:30 a.m., Conference Room # 3 ./ L-ð
St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Adminis71Jle~ ¡v' ;/}
V /') (JG./ 1 .
If fll rv' D)Iti'~ t; ~ ~
I' ;0 {~ É
X ~ 1r-1¿~ -
J
Convene meeting
Roll Call, announcements
Minutes
Old Business
Jail Pods Budget (for discussion with Public Safety Cpord. Council memb~rs)
.' .\1
Update on SLC Utilities
Adjournment
Next CBC meeting:
May 21,2004
~ {)..;~
p,~6 . ~ fA/Ou/J?
LJ f ~(t- ß--.i¡
'-'
~
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
Agenda
Friday, April 5,2005
7:30 a.m., Conference Room # 3
St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex
Convene meeting
Roll Call, announcements
Minutes
1. Hurricane Recovery Efforts. Reimbursement Update.
2. Downtown Fort Pierce - Capital Projects.
Adjournment
Budget-in-brief Distribution UPda~te. S/.J ",....Þ.
þotAtA."Y)
Criminal Justice Study Update. ..s. 17&~ 6 />.
'ef. I t.--fl'sJ' J:- ~rv.
2005/2006 Budget /1-. ..-,,,..,"
It; 0 Þ
~í7;;
Next CBC meeting: May 20, 2005 ~
Facility Space Study (RFP).
3.
4.
5.
6.
Board of Directors
Alan Kalmanoff, JD, MSW, Ph.D,
Board President
Executive Director
Linda Guyden, CP;\
Board Treasurer
J. 'ice P""ÙJent. Prudential In.ruranæ
SheBey Bergum
Board Secretary
Director, V"ff and Diwbled
Telemmmunication.r, Tn¡:
Robert Funk
Rerjred General Counsel
Equal Employment
O/,/)ortum'ty Commif.rion
Dr, Blanche Pearlman
¡{¡¡.rear,,!> PsycboÙ(gift
Candice Wong. 1'.1.D,. 1'.1,P,H,. Ph.D,
Healt!> Senice.r ]{¡¡Jean'!>
l.inÌ1;mity olCali/ornia. San Pl1m<'Ì.rCII
Advisory Board Members
Brian Taugher
D(l~uly Attom~y Gel/eml
Ca!i/òrnia Deparlmenl oj] UJ/ice
ABen Breed
Relirrd Dim-lor
Nati01ùlllnJtitute (!f CorrectionJ
I. Michael Heyman
,bretary. Smit/;Jonitm 1 nJtitution
Sheldon 1'.1,cssingcr
PmjÚror ol Lûu' and Sodety
U nivmity ol Cali/òmia, Berkel,y
Ruth Rushen
Retirod Dim10r
Càlijòrnia Depa/1menl o/ComdionJ
Dr. Mimi Si1bert
Pre,rident
Delancey Street F'oulI(/'ltiol!
Dr. Bayard Catron
Profè.r.ror o/Public AdminÙtmtiol!
Gem;~e W-a.rhingtoft U nivcni(y
)udithHcumann
Ar,rirtanlSwptar)'
Ojfìæ ol.\þeda/ EdumtÌfJII
Rehabilitation Se/vlCe.r
Nancy Isaac
Tmn,rportationf C{¡mmunÌly PlamIÙz,1;
ILPP
2613 HIlLEGASS AVENUE
BERKELEY, CA 94704
MAIN: 510,486.8352
FAX: 510.841.3710
WWW.ILPP.COM
PLANNERS@ILPP.COM
'--"
Þ)7 . Vv/
Lf/&!' LCV V Ç/~> C/
. ~ tF .J'~ o.,.}
(\, /1,1 /:J' 1#
l) {;i /7
{. . ')
~. tr' &
(J1Y}~v1~ f1
f'Ìr
April 7, 2005
Douglas M, Anderson
County Manager's Office
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, FL 34982
Dear Mr. Anderson:
You asked for some clarification of our recommendation to not occupy
additional jail space (currently in the final stages of being built). These
beds should not be opened to County inmates until the criminal justice
Action Plan has had a chance to be implemented.
This advisory is pretty much the norm, wherever these studies have been
done, and it is also an approach long recommended by the National
Institute of Correction's PONI program, and the Department of Justice's
Total Systems Assessment Approach.
As there are so many immediate and no-cost recommendations that will
reduce demand, it would be financially imprudent and a direct avoidance
of the widely subscribed to Action Plan, to simply occupy the new space
at this time. First, crowding should be quickly and easily reduced by
implementation.
F or example, if the Sheriff immediately began issuing field and jail
citations and the Public Defender met with all their clients immediately, as
is clearly best-practice, both agencies would save on internal efficiencies
and immediately lower jail demand significantly. If the Public Defender
supported bail and OR (own recognizance) motions (even with the use of
the current lawyer at the jail), it's likely the County would be down several
hundred beds before new ones could even be occupied. Establishing the
most basic OR program would further drastically reduce crowding right
away,
These are relatively free and quickly implemented recommendations and
they represent very few; there are dozens of other recommendations that
deserve a chance - a chance that is much more unlikely if capacity is
suddenly expanded at the moment the recommendations are pending and
have the most potential to be effective.
Sincerely,
Alan Kalmanoff
Executive Director
Institute for Law and Policy Planning
"-'
...,.I
Draft
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: March 18, 2005
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jacquelene N. Burke, Ron Parrish, Toby Philpart, John Knapp, Debbie Hawley,
Edward Lounds, Troy Ingersoll, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick and Carl Hensley.
MEMBERS ABSENT Lillie Miller, William "Bill"Casey, Steven Messer and Linda Bartz.
OTHERS PRESENT: Faye Outlaw, Kristy Lilly, Sophia Holt and Doug Anderson.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
Doug stated staff had just received the final report on the SLC Criminal Justice System Assessment and he
would be making a couple of comments on this matter.
Carl pointed out that there are 2 vacancies in this committee and encouraged members to contact
Commissioner Lewis and/or Ed Fry, if they have someone in mind to be appointed.
MINUTES
There being no further corrections to the minutes for the February 18, 2005 meeting, Ed moved for
approval and Troy seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and the motion passed.
Appoint CBC member to the Court System Advisory Board
This Board was created at the request of the Public Safety Coordinating Council for the purpose of planning
future court needs within the county (for details, please refer to resolution number 01-194). They meet the
last Thursday of the month (when they agree it is necessary to do so) before the Public Safety Coordinating
Council meeting, at 3:00 p.m. One of its requirements is representation from the Citizen's Budget Committee
(one appointee).
Debbie proposed to appoint Ron Parrish, since by virtue off his line of work, his abilities would be of
assistance to this board's purpose. Ron stated he could attend the meetings. There being no other
nominations, all members voted in favor to appoint Ron Parrish to the Court System Advisory Board.
Bude:et in Brief
Doug asked if the members had any further comments about this document, which had been brought to this
committee at the last meeting. He asked if they agreed it was ready to be distributed.
Members stated they believed it to be informative and very well written, a great summary that will give the
public a good overview of where the money goes to. They stressed the need to find ways to promote its
distribution out to the community.
Ron moved to approve the document and make sure it gets out to the public, Pat seconded the
motion. All members voted in favor and motion passed.
Hurricane Recovery Efforts
Faye handed out a sheet with the figures regarding the reimbursements for hurricane damages (it provides
a breakdown of the reimbursements the County has received to date) and briefly explained some details of
what these figures cover.
Staff is confident that the amounts they have to date as estimated damage are accurate and will not be
changing much from now on, with three big exceptions: Indian River Drive repair, the Civic Center (still to
be determined if it is total loss) and damages to the old courthouse. CBC members and staff discussed the
plan of action staff is following regarding these specific projects,
Ed inquired if staff has found a viable facility for "Special Needs".
Doug stated that although it has not been announced, staff has found a facility that could be retrofitted for
about $60,000. It's a school building.
Downtown Fort Pierce Buildine: Proiects
'-"
~
Doug pointed out the memo included in the packet, dated March 2, 2005, which contains the revised
construction dates and estimated costs of these projects. He highlighted the revisions to the projects, which
were also discussed at the last meeting (please refer to memo for details).
Article V. Revision 7 e:litches
Doug referred to a letter in the agenda packet addressed to Ronald L. Book (he works as lobbyist for the
County) describing problems staff has found regarding several matters, since "Article V, Revision 7" began
its implementation (July 1, 2004). These issues are creating additional expenses to the County and need to
be addressed by State Government (Please refer to the agenda packet for more information).
SLC Criminal Justice System Assessment
Doug announced that the final report for this study will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners
at a special workshop on March 22, 2005, immediately following the board's regular meeting (tentatively
scheduled for 10:30 a,m., or earlier if the board meeting is over before that time). The report has made
recommendations for improvement to every branch of the system.
Doug encouraged the CBC members to attend the workshop, as the decisions to be made to implement it will
definitely have budget implications. The report will also be presented to the Public Safety Coordinating
Council at their next meeting.
Committee members and staff discussed some specifics in the report, such as the findings in the jail and the
court.
Doug believes the study has been a great investment, because since the study began, the jail population has
gone down a notable percentage and according to its recommendations it may not be necessary to open the
new pods (saving therefore operational expenses, and may imply some revenue if one is open for federal
inmates) ,
Members requested to be updated on this issue at the next meeting and stressed they would like to know
each of the agencies responses to the study's findings.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC regular meeting is scheduled to be held on Friday, April 15, 2005 at 7:30 a,m., in Conference
Room # 3 of the St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 8:40 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
Carl Hensley, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
March 18, 2005
H:IO Secretary\O OMB\CBC\MinI0318,wpd
page 2
'-"
~
JOB CODE:
PAY GRADE: 28
SALARY: $60,844.16 - $97,329.23
CRIMINAL JUSTICE COORDINATOR
MAJOR FUNCTION: This position is responsible for implementing the criminal
justice system assessment action plan, and carrying out the County's directives,
which includes but is not limited to, gathering data, implementing initiatives and
coordinating task forces. Position reports to the County Administrator.
KNOWLEDGE, ABILITIES AND SKILLS NEEDED IN ORDER TO PERFORM THE
ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTIONS: Knowledge - Knowledge of issues, controversies,
current thinking, progressive ideas and programs related to the criminal justice
system. Knowledge of the principles, practices and methods of grant development
and monitoring. Comprehensive knowledge of the criminal justice system, planning
and evaluation, and computer operations. Abilities - Ability to communicate
effectively verbally and in writing at a professional level with a wide variety of
individuals. Ability to compile and analyze facts and data, draw conclusions and
prepare reports. Ability to establish and maintain effective working relationships with
the public and fellow employees.
ESSENTIAL JOB FUNCTION: Plans and participates in continual coordination
meetings with the County and subcommittees. Meets with representatives from
various criminal justice system agencies to implement priorities established by
PSCC and County. Analyzes and makes recommendations on implementing the
action plan by presenting criminal data including both misdemeanor arrests and
index crimes. Analyzes and makes recommendations on jurisdictional usage of jail.
Compiles and analyzes criminal justices system budget data, including annual
budgets and staffing patterns consistent with budget priorities. Researches
additional issues specific to St. Lucie County as requested by the PSCC, andlor
County Administrator. Provides the PSCC and County Administrator with status
reports on progress of recommendations and implementations. Develops and
evaluates grant applications; reviews current grants and makes recommendations
for funding which will reduce or control crime andlor improve the criminal justice
system. Represents the County at special functions and seminars associated with
the education of the public and the improvement of the criminal justice system.
Performs related duties as requested or assigned.
ESSENTIAL PHYSICAL SKILLS: Use of hands and fingers with dexterity. Good
handleye coordination. Very frequent use of good near and far vision and good
hearing. Frequent walking, sitting and standing. Ability to lift occasionally 30
pounds. Ability to speak clearly and concisely.
ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITION REQUIREMENTS: Constant work inside the office
in a sedentary posture.
'--'
....,
WORK HAZARDS: Possible vision dysfunction due to heavy computer work.
SAFETY EQUIPMENT USED OR NEEDED: None
EDUCATION: Graduation from an accredited college or university with a Bachelor's
or Master's degree in a closely related field. A comparable amount of training or
experience may be substituted for the minimum qualifications.
EXPERIENCE: Six (6) years of progressively responsible criminal justice
experience, at least two (2) of which must have been in a management or
administrative capacity.
LICENSE, CERTIFICATION OR REGISTRATION: Must possess a valid state
driver's license and have a satisfactory driving record.
Äpr 14. 2805 4:37PM
ih OC60 p, 2
.~~
,..-
.'
~
..."
Florida House of Representatives
Representative Joe Negron
2400 S. Federal Highway, Suite 250
Stuart. Florida 34994-4590
(772) 22 t -4904-
(772) 221-4906 FAX
Committees;
Chairman. Fiscal Council
Chairman, LegJ¡lati\lc Budget Commission
Rules and Calendar Council
Select Committee on Mediœid Refonn
402 South Monroe Street
221 Capitol
Tallahassee, Florida 32399-1300
(8~O) 488-8832
April 14,2005
Frannie HutchiDson, Chair
St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners
2300 Virginia Avenue
Ft Pierce, FL 34982
Re: Hurricane Relief
Dear Frannie:
The following local projects were approved this afternoon by the Legislative Budget
Commission. The funds for these hurricane repair/restoration projects will be a combination of
federal and state funds.
CR 707 JlDdlaD River Drive Restoration of roadway - $29.6 miJlioJt
CR 707/Indian River Drive Temporary Repairs - 55 million
SR A1A1Litt1e Mud Creek Bridge Repair Washout - $2.9 million
I thought YQU would be interested to know. Please feel free to contact me ¡fyou need any
other information or have any questions.
Sincerely,
t~
State Representative
District 82
IN/hd
'-'
....,
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
Agenda
Friday, March 19, 2004
7:30 a.m., Conference Room #3
St. Lucie County Administrative Annex
1, Convene meeting
1,1 Roll Call, announcements
1.2 Minutes
µø~#Þ
2.
2,1
2,2
3.
3,1
3.2
New Business
( ~"
",-I~ "I:.J{' L
I - /':'/ ¿ ¡,..J
.¡JI" ¡;;
Jf 4 4,../ >s'¿~/),
v ~/,/J P ) V ".
/) '> tv; ~,.~ . ¡1
(./I{) {;D ./W, V
. V 1"'- I!'" },Jr'V (d'/! .
V, fIlL-
()
~
Update on Joint meeting with Cities
Update on Status of Jail Pods construction
Old Business
Review 5 Year Capital Plan
SLC County Landfill (Tour)
4. Adjournment
4,1 Next CBC meeting: April 16, 2004 1_,',
1 J ! l~
J. ~ /T / fV'(í) ·
) J )¿ Y,,¡fl'J ;? l
, Do t2 b
f) }Jj
") I
r
,
" .
~
......,
Draft
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMI'ITEE
Meeting Date: February 20, 2004
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT:David F. Samuel, Mark Taynton, Ron Parrish, Paul Young, William
"Bill"Casey, Debbie Hawley, John Knapp, Ed Lounds, Sylvie Kramer, Troy
Ingersoll, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick and Carl Hensley.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Kenny Hogan, Steven Messer and Linda Bartz.
OTHERS PRESENT: Mike Bowers, Vanessa Bessey, Don West, Richard Bouchard, Pete Keogh,
Linda Brown, Ray Wazny, Paul Phillips, Leo Cordeiro, Debbie Scribner,
Jennifer Hill, Doug Anderson and Marie Gouin.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
Comments from City of Port St. Lucie's Manae:er in newspapers
Doug handed out copy of an article published in the Palm Beach Post and pointed out a
paragraph which contained statements from the City Port St. Lucie's manager. The article
suggests the City of Port St. Lucie plans to "compete" with several counties (including St. Lucie
County) for spinoff companies of The Scripps Research Institute.
Doug assured committee members the County is not competing for spinoff companies form the
institute and stated he doesn't know from where Mr. Cooper got such information. Doug stated
staff is O1ÙY working at the moment on the possibility of constructing the Research Park and is
in no way linked to attract spinoff companies form the Institute.
Doug continued to read parts of the article that states Mr. Cooper recommended that the city
council stop collecting impact fees for the County and instead establish the city's own impact fees
to schedule their capital needs.
Staff and committee members discussed the impact it would have on the County's Capital Budget
if the City of Port St. Lucie would go ahead with such an idea. CBC members and staff decided
to wait to see if the City pursues the idea in the future.
MEETING MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the January 16, 2004 meeting, David moved
for approval and Ron seconded the motion. AU members present voted in favor and the
motion passed.
SLC Utilities
Doug mentioned staff had sent, during the last two weeks, updates on the Board's actions
regarding the County's Utilities system.
"-'
""'"
1
He stated the BaCC instructed staff not to proceed with the expansion of the Holiday Pines plant,
as they came to realize it is not currently in the best interest of the community, but there are
plans to site a new regional wastewater treatment plant facility in the future. He gave a few
details of the plans for this new project (estimated to cost approximately $60MM).
Doug went over different aspects of the utilities agreement with FPUA, and staff and committee
members discussed the boundaries of the utilities systems as well as how it will benefit the
community. Doug also explained the terms of the agreement in regards of how it will affect
certain areas, such as Indian River Estates (they will be requested to vote on how they want their
selVice) and how this agreement will allow for utilities rates to lower.
CBC members and staff also discussed in what way future areas of growth, such as Midway Rd.
will be affected and what are the plans to provide selVice to those areas (e.g. we may expand the
Fairgrounds Water plant).
For details of the highlights of this agreement, please refer to the two sheets in the packet
handed out at the meeting and to exhibit A in these minutes (map showing the proposed utilities
coverage as approved by the BaCC on March 2, 2004). Staff is in the process of routing the
agreement to FPUA and the City of Fort Pierce for signatures.
Lincoln Park Community Center
Doug stated another positive news in relation to the County and the City of Fort Pierce is the fact
that, after conversations with concerned citizens, the County has agreed to open the Lincoln Park
Community Center on Saturday nights (estimated operations cost of the program for the first 6
months is approximately $14,000). For security reasons, it is necessary- to assign four deputies
to patrol the area and the City offort Pierce has offered one police officer at their cost. Therefore,
only three sheriff officers will be required.
CBC members and staff discussed how the County and the City of Fort Pierce are working
together to solve the costs of security for the community.
Joint meetinl[ with the Cities
Bill Casey inquired what is the County doing to bring to the Cities' attention how much the
County is doing in those areas and the costs it generates.
Doug stated what has been done in regards to this matter and announced there is ajoint meeting
with both cities set up for March 4th (at IRCe) to discuss county expenses. There are facilitators
invited to participate. Doug also stated the County has spent over $30MM in the City of Port St.
Lucie area and over $20MM in the City of Fort Pierce area, in the course of the past several years,
in these partnerships. ~
Fort Pierce annexation policy t'\
Doug also stated the City of Fort Pi ce will not be annexing outside their utilities selVices area.
The City Commission has taken 0 . the table pursuing annexation of the Airport for now and
Commissioner Bob Benton has stated publicly, he will not support annexation of the Airport as
long as he is in office. Also, the City will not authorize annexation of the Airport until it meets
State law requirements for annexation (contiguous and compact selVice).
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
February 20, 2004
page 2
}-
"-'
'-'
Committee members inquired if the utilities area coverage marked in the agreement means that
they will be annexed to the City of Fort Pierce. Doug stated in the affirmative (it will happen
eventually), but that this process is gradual and may take 20 to 30 years.
Request for an addition Assistant County Administrator position
As discussions on the utilities agreement continued Troy proposed staff should have somebody
to attend meetings, such as planning.
Doug stated that staff realizes the importance of having somebody representing the County at
these meetings, but for time constraints, they are not able to cover all of them. For this reason
staff is considering, requesting to the BaCC to approve an additional Assistant County
Administrator to coordinate with the Cities in all their developing plans, so that the growth in the
whole community would be more harmonized.
CBC members also discussed the importance of other entities, such as the Sheriff, the Fire
District and the School Board participating at meetings like the Planing and Zoning Committee
(being careful not to drag simplified issues unnecessarily), so that their input can be heard to
avoid further development problems in the future.
Landf"ill Fundinli!
Leo Cordeiro, SLC Solid Waste Manager, explained handout sheet which lists the Landfill's
different sources of revenue, including recycling of scrap. He also spoke briefly of the plans to sell
methane gas to Tropicana.
Leo stated the Landfill has come a long way in the past eleven years. At that time, it was
estimated that it would close by the year 2008. Today the estimated life is of another 30 years
(even taking into account the recent tremendous growth of the area) and once the construction
demolition recycling facility the County is in the process of building begins its operation, there
will be mining of sections that were already closed and may increase its life-span to 60 years.
Doug offered committee members that staff could host the next CBC meeting at the Landfill, to
give a tour of the facility at the end of the meeting. CBC members agreed. A map is provided in
these minutes packet. If you have any questions, please contact us at 462-1670.
CBC members and staff also discussed other aspects of the operation, such as Florida Recycling
(auditing of their collection fees and the quality of their selVice).
Beach re-nourishment
Richard Bouchard was invited to the meeting to explain the Beach Erosion Program and the cuts
the State has made to the budget (generating a $750,00 shortfall). He explained the most recent
events and explained reasons why its necessary to replenish the beaches at Fort Pierce. He
spoke about how it benefits the tourism (enhances the beaches ), the environmental aspects
(such as protection to the sea turtle population) and storm damage protection (from Hurricanes).
Mark inquired what is the time frame to begin the re-nourishment this year and Richard stated
they are constrained to be done by end of May, for environmental reasons; therefore the need to
take care of this situation is imminent.
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
February 20. 2004
page 3
, ,\ .'..
w
\J
~
Purchase of Properties
Doug referred to letter from the County's financial advisor with his opinion on the County's
capability to borrow for the purchase of the shrimp property ($3MM) and a property for the
Research and Education Park ($lOMM). For details please refer to copy provided to CBC
members at the meeting.
Committee members and staff discussed some details of the possibility to purchase such
properties.
St. Lucie County Jail - New Pods
At the previous meeting committee members had requested to know what is the cost per inmate,
per day to the County. Bill Casey mentioned the sheet provided at the meeting with the
information and inquired about the Federal Inmate Program.
Ed requested information on the Time frame to begin construction. He stated he is worried the
longer it takes to begin their operation, the more expensive it will become and the more problems
it will generate for the Sheriff to keep up with its operations budget or benefit from the Federal
Inmate Program.
Doug gave committee members an update on the costs and where we stand on the time frame
to begin construction. Staff will provide additional information to committee members as soon
as possible.
NEXT MEETING
Due to time constraints, the Capital Projects were once again tabled to a future meeting. The
next CBC meeting will be held on Friday, February 20,2004 at 7:30 a.m., in Conference Room
# 3 of the St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex. Topics to be discussed will
include update on the joint meeting with the cities, status on construction of the jail pods and
a tour of the SLC Landfill.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjoumed at 9:05 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
William "Bill" Casey, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
February 20. 2004
H:\O SecretarylO OMB\CBCIMin\02'20wpd
page 4
---
~
L .~
7"
_.i§.....;~;.; ,~w;;;;;;
. . .
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
Agenda
Friday, March 18, 2005
7:30 a.m., Conference Room # 3
St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex
Convene meeting
Roll Call, announcements
).
( þ'>!:'?
Appoint a CBC representativ~éêourt System Advisory Board.
Minutes
¡
J
Budget-in-brief Document feedback. ',_ ~ ,";- ¿/..t, ~
I'¡-- 'f/J)O 4 ( t..-14 .
V Hurricane Recovery Efforts.
4. Downtown Fort Pierce Court Expansion - Capital Projects.
5. Article V, Revision 7 glitches.
b. (I".. -_.~ <.-- .-/l-IJ?) æ ð:n-/.1 {r
7. /L-e-NI'}-- ~ "
Adjournment
Next CBC meeting: April 15, 2005
r-
,.
'-'
"""'"
Draft
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: February 18,2005
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:35 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jacquelene N. Burke, Lillie Miller, Ron Parrish, John Knapp, Debbie Hawley,
Edward Lounds, Troy Ingersoll, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick, Carl Hensley, Linda Bartz.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Toby Philpart, William "Bill"Casey and Steven Messer.
OTHERS PRESENT: Mitch Hillburn (SLC Bail Agent Assoc.), Faye Outlaw, Ray Wazny, Jennifer
Hill, Marie Gouin and Doug Anderson.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
None
MINUTES
Debbie pointed out John Knapp appeared as absent and present in the minutes. Staff took
note of the correction (he was absent).
There being no further corrections to the minutes for the January 21,2005 meeting, Ron
moved for approval and Debbie seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor
and the motion passed.
Stratee:ic Plannine: Session
Staff handed out copies of the presentation made at the Strategic Planing Session the day before
and Doug, Faye and Marie made brief summaries of the issues discussed (please refer to your
copies for further details. Staff can provide extra copies if you did not attend the meeting).
Items reviewed included future weather trends, a panel discussion of various utilities and how
prepared these entities are as well as the weaknesses they need to take care of as soon as possible,
County needs such as portable radios and electric generators, hurricane recovery process, financial
exposure.
CBC members asked for clarification of some details, such as why is the Sheriff Dept. Returning
money (Before, during and right after the disaster, the Sheriff provided deputies to help manage
the traffic and other sorts of tasks, they therefore, incurred quite a bit of overtime. The County
advanced them the funds to cover this expense until they went through the FEMA process to get
reimbursed.
What does the sum for sign repairs cover? The County lost over 10,000 street signs, (all kinds)
which got blown away.
What does the $6.9 MM for Mosquito impoundments entail? These are huge dikes that where
destroyed with the high tides and their purpose is to keep the mosquito population as low as
possible (Please see attached to these minutes a chart kindly provided by Jim David, Mosquito
Director, which lists the Project Worksheets that are and will be submitted to FEMA for
reimbursement and outlines the expenses - Annex 1)
Doug clarified that the numbers shown on hurricane recovery are revised and updated constantly.
Staff and committee members discussed and compared this disaster to previous hurricanes (Irene,
Floyd). The reimbursement process usually takes about five years.
'-'
'wi
Other matters discussed included issues such as the fact that for the FY 2005-2006 budget to
balance, staff estimates the properties values would have to increase at least by 13%. Anything
above that percentage should preferably go to rebuilding the reserves and mitigate the deficit
caused by the disaster.
Staff and committee members discussed the risk of not maintaining (or losing) a good bond rating
(the better, the lower interest rate the county will get on loans, and the better insurance rates).
The Property Appraiser has had approximately 40,000 replies to survey damaged properties after
the hurricane and he is decreasing values on an individual basis, so these residents can be taken
care of.
Marie mentioned briefly the salary survey in regards of next year's salary adjustments.
Capital projects will have to be re-prioritized to accommodate the circumstances after the
hurricanes. The decisions to be made will depend on the federal government's response to our
emergency needs. Two of the Capital Projects that were re-prioritized at the Strategic Planing
Session were the Emergency Operations Center(EOC) and the Special Needs Shelter (which would
house about 500 people).
According to Florida Statues, the County is in charge of the emergency operations when we are
under a state of emergency. However, the City of Port St. Lucie wants to build its own EOC.
Following FEMA's guidelines, the County's Emergency Operations Center (which would be the
official, State Certified EOC) must be outside of a 10 miles ratio of the nuclear power plant. The
parcel of land the City of PSL is planning to build their EOC is within the 10 miles ratio of the
nuclear plant. Ifthe County gets funding from the State, the most likely site available outside the
10 miles ratio would be at the fairgrounds and staff would have to act quickly to have it completed.
If the Special Needs Shelter is built at the Fairgrounds, it could have dual purpose.
Staff and committee members also discussed other details, such as fuel needs (build a depot).
Bude:et in Brief
Marie Gouin, St. Lucie County Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Director handed out copy
of a leaflet OMB has prepared to make available to the public. The "Budget in Brief' document
highlights the most important aspects of the County Budget (how big it is, sources of revenue,
types of expenditures, etc.).
Marie requested CBC members to give their input to determine if the document is user friendly and
informative. She asked members to take the copy with them and come back at the next CBC
meeting with their feedback. Any suggestions to make the leaflet easier to understand and useful
will be very much appreciated.
Once staff gets committee members' feedback a few aspects of the information will be reconfirmed
with the Department Heads to make sure all the information is accurate and will be released to the
public as soon as possible and staff will prepare this document every year and distribute it to the
public at the same time the Budget Book is published.
At the meeting committee members also made some initial suggestions as to how to distribute the
leaflet, such as including it in the Property Appraiser's and Tax Collector's notices, County Utility
bills, as well as having copies available at the BOCC meetings.
Downtown Fort Pierce Buildine: Protects
Doug referred to the memo included in the agenda packet that listed the projects and gave a brief
explanation of each of these projects (for details, please refer to memo dated Feb. 14, 2005).
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
February 18, 2005
page 2
~
""'"
Doug reiterated to CBC members that staffwill come back with the revised Five Year Capital Plan
for this committee's feedback and to address the most pressing needs.
SLC Bail Aa:ent Association
Two representatives of the St. Lucie County Bail Agent Association handed out copies of an
executive summary that outlines their roll within the criminal justice system (some important
passages in the report are highlighted) and made a very complete and interesting presentation in
regards of how it impacts the court system.
CBC members inquired about several details of the process and thanked the speakers for their
thorough explanation of the process, which was very enlightening.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC regular meeting is scheduled to be held on Friday, March 18, 2005 at 7:30 a.m., in
Conference Room # 3 of the St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex .
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 8:35 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
Carl Hensley, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
February 18, 2005
H:\O Secretary\O OMBICBC\Min\0218.wpd
page 3
~
...-" \
RESOLUTION NO. 01-194
A RESOLUTION CREATING THE COU
SYSTEM ADVISORY BOARD, A D
PROVIDING FOR DUTIES AND FUNCTIO S
OF THE BOARD
WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie C unty, Florida, has made
1. On August 22, 2001, the Public Safety Coordinating Council et, which consists of the
the following determinations:
Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners, Chief County Co Judge, Sheriff, Chief
Correctional Officer, State Attorney, Public Defender, State Probation Pr gram Administrator, and
Substance Abuse Treatment Program Representative.
2. The Public Safety Coordinating Council recommended th t the Board of County
Commissioners appoint a Court System Advisory Board for the purpose of planning future court
needs within the county, and to review and provide recommendations all aspects relating to
standard policies, procedures, and budgetary needs for the court system.
3. This Board should create a Court System Advisory Board and further define the duties
and functions of the Court System Advisory Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of Co ty Commissioners ofS1.
1. This Board does hereby create the Court System Advisory Bo . This Bôard shall have
Lucie County, Florida:
the following duties and functions:
a. The Court System Advisory Board will plan futur court needs within the
County and work in conjunction with the Pub ic Safety Coordinating
Council.
b. Prepare a Technology Plan and review and update 't annually.
c. Monitor the level of court support available to C unty offices and devise
'-"
,/'
strategies for improving it as necessary.
d. Assist in establishment of Court System Budget.
e. Provide assistance on the types and amount of training that should be
available.
f. Set priorities that help guide the development effo s of the Court System.
g. Recommend revisions in policies and procedures at impact Court System
use.
2. The action, decisions and recommendations of the Court Syst m Advisory Board shall
not be final or binding on the Board of County Commissioners, but shall e advisory only.
3. The Court System Advisory Board shall consist of thirteen (1 ) members who shall be
appointed as follows:
a. Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners
b. Chief County Court Judge
c. Sheriff
d. Chief Correctional Officer
e. State Attorney
f. Public Defender
g. State Probation Program Administrator
h. Substance Abuse Treatment Program Representati e
1. Clerk of Court
J. Court Administrator
k. One Representative designated by the St. Lucie C ty Bar Association
1. One Representative designated by the Port St. Luc e Bar Association
m. One Representative designated by the Citizen's B dget Committee
4. The Court System Advisory Board may establish sub-commi ees for specific subjects
or tasks ftom among its members to reduce the amount of time each Advi ory Board member must
devote to the functions of that Board and to spread the responsibility for c ntributing to the Court's
strategies among a larger number of people.
5. All members shall serve without compensation.
6. Membership shall be terminated upon:
a. Death
b. End of Employment
c. Removal by majority vote of the Advisory Board
'-"
f.¡"'/ '
d. Three (3) unexcused absences in a six (6) month p nod
Vacan.cies for all appointments shall be filled by the majo vote of
the Advisory Board.
7. The Advisory Board Chairman shall establish a time and place for holding the meetings
as shall be necessary, and the Advisory Board shall adopt rules of org zation and procedure as
8. The Advisory Board shall hold its first meeting as soon as p sible :/Tom the date this
may be required.
resolution is adopted.
9. The County Administration staff shall provide support for the Advisory Board by
providing the required public notice, preparing agendas and keeping a rec rd of its proceedings.
10. If any action, sentence, or clause of this resolution is held to be invalid or
unconstitutional by any Court of competent jurisdiction then said holding hall in no way effect the
validity of the remaining portions of this resolution.
After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follow :
Chairman Frannie Hutchinson
AYE
Vice Chairman Doug Coward
AYE
Commissioner Paula A. Lewis
ABS
Commissioner Cliff Barnes
AYE
Commissioner John D. Bruhn
AYE
PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 28th day of August, 2001.
'7
.:\ ';., \~. :,-.. ...
...:.....
...... ,
'-'
'-"
....,
TO:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
MEMORANDUM
05-34
_ 8 r
FROM:
Douglas M. Anderson,
DATE:
March 2, 2005
RE:
Downtown Fort Pierce Projects - REVISED CONSTRUCTION DATES
Below is a list of projects with the estimated project cost, construction timeframe, and funding
source.
Clerk of Courts Buildina
Construction Time frame......May01, 2005 November 05, 2006 June 20, 2005 . December 31, 2006
Esti mated Project Cost......... ...... ........ ..... ....... ............1.. ........ ................................. I. ............................ $6,900,000
Funding Source - FEMA.................. .................. ............... ....... .......... ................................ 155,357
Down Payment - Other Facilities Impact Fees ............................................................... 1,000,000
2004 General Fund Transfer.............................. ..................... ....... ................................... 900,000
2004 Capital Budget - Fund 316 ....................................................................................... 922,908
Bond Proceeds Being Paid by Other Public Facilities Impact Fees ............................... 3,000,000
Sales Tax Bond Issue 2003 ....................................................................................... $ 921.735
T ota I.......... ........................... ... ...... .............. .....1.. ........... ................................. $6,900,000
Monumental Staircase
Construction Time frame.................. May01,2QQ5 Mar-G1:1 07, 2006 August 01,2005· June 7, 2006
Estimated Project Cost........... ......... .............. ......... ..... ................ .............................. $1,238,000
Funding Source - Bond Issue Being Paid by Other Public Facilities Impact Fees
District Coolina
Construction Time frame.........lI.pril15,20g5 December 01, 2005 June 21, 2005 - February 7,2006
Estimated Project Cost ........ ................................ .................... ..................... ..... ........ $1 ,91 0,000
Funding Source - Bond Issue Being Paid by Other Public Facilities Impact Fees
Old Courthouse Renovation - 4 New Courtrooms
Construction Time Frame/Renovation........................................August 01 ,2005 - June 05,2006
Construction Time Frame/Remove-Replace ..............................January 01 ,2006 - July 01,2007
Estimated Project Cost (if facility is renovated) ...................................................... $4,546,875
Funding Source - Insurance, FEMA, and Revenue Source to be Determined
~
..."
Page 2
March 2, 2005
Downtown Fort Pierce Projects
Downtown Parkina Garaae
Construction Time Frame...........~........................................ August 01,2005 - February 07,2006
Estimated Project Cost........................ ................. ...................... ............................... $2,500,000
Funding Source - Fort Pierce CRA
Please let me know if you have any questions.
DMNab 05-34
c: Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Faye Outlaw, Assistant County Administrator
Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney
Marie Gouin, Management and Budget Director
Roger Shinn, Central Services Director
Don McLam, Assistant Central Services Director
~
.."""
BOARD OF
COUNTY
COMMISSIONERS
COUNTY
ADMINISTRATOR
DOUGLAS M. ANDERSON
March 9, 2005
Ronald L. Book, P.A.
Attorney at Law
Concorde Center 2
2999 Northeast 191st Street
Penthouse 6
Aventura, FL., 33180
Dear Ron:
We are experiencing several difficulties with implementation of Article
V I Revision 7. One of the issues we are having is the mandatory court cost of
up to $65 on those who plead guilty or nolo contendre to, or are found guilty of
a felony, misdemeanor or criminal traffic offense.
1. a. Law Libraries
25% of this $65 fee is to be used for operation of law libraries. The
problem is that the collection of this 25% is extremely rare and does
not pay for the law libraries. St. Lucie County is looking at a
$396,012 annual shortfall. A replacement revenue must be
implemented to cover the operating cost of law libraries.
b. Legal Aid Services
25% of the same $65 fee is to be used for funding Legal Aid. Once
again, the collection of this assessment is rare. Therefore, a
replacement fee or fine must be put into place to fund Legal Aid. The
estimated cost to St. Lucie County for Legal Aid on an annual basis is
$93,345.60.
c. Teen Court/Innovative Court Programs
The remaining 50% of the $65 fee is to fund these programs. Once
again, the money collected is not sufficient to cover this cost. It is our
understanding that the $65 is at the bottom of the totem pole to be
collected.
JOSEPH E, SMITH, District No, 1 · DOUG COWARD, District No, 2 · PAULA A. lEWIS, District No, J . FRANNIE RUTCHINSON, District No.4. CHRIS Cl\AFT, District No, 5
County Administrator - Douglas M, Anderson
2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 · Phone (772) 462-1450 . TDD (772) 462-1428
FAX (772) 462-1648 · email: douga@co.st-Iucie.fl.us
web site: www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us
'-"
..,
Page 2
March 9, 2005
Article V / Revision 7
2 Communication Services Tax
The SB 1192/HB 651 Communications Services Tax amendment
regarding wireless communications will affect the sales tax portion of
the Communication Services Tax. However, since sales tax is shared
with local governments, the bill will reduce the half-cent county and
municipal revenue sharing. The Revenue Estimating Conference
analyzed the impact of SB 1192 and estimates that the overall state
impact will be in the range of some $400-500 million. The local
government impact is estimated to be in the range of $40-50 million
statewide (see attached analysis).
3 Juvenile Detention Centers
Should the fmancial responsibility ,for Juvenile Detention Centers
(JDC) be levied against the counties, the counties should have the
option of running the JDC locally. The way the proposed funding is
established is that the counties were to reimburse the State for
expenses incurred with no local control over these costs.
Please let me know if you need additional information.
./7
c: Board of County Commissioners
Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Faye Outlaw, Assistant County Administrator
Dan McIntyre, County Attorney
Marie Gouin, Management and Budget Director
Citizens' Budget Development Committee
Public Safety Coordinating Council
Attachment
'-"
¥
REVENUE ESTIMATING CONFERENCE
TAX: COMMUNICATION SERVICES TAX
ISSUE: REsIDENTIAL WIRELESS SERVICE
BILL NUMBER(S): SB 1192
SPONSOR(S): SEN. GARCIA
MoNTHIYEAR COLLECflON IMPACT BEGINS: JULY 1,2005
DATE OF ANALYSIS: 2/1712005
SECflON 1: NARRATIVE
a. Current Law:
Section 202.125(1), F.S., exempts communication services sold to residential households from the sales tax portion of the
communication services tax and specifically excludes any mobile communication service from this exemption.
b. Proposed Change:
Mobile communication services having a residential service address are included in the exemption provided to communication
services sold to residential households.
SECflON 2: DESCRIPTION OF DATA AND SOURCES
Federal Communications Commission - Local Telephone Competition: Status as of June 30,2004
Table 11: Percentage of Lines Provided to Residential and Small Business Customers
Table 13: Mobile Wireless Telephone Subscribers
DOR Distribution Data for Communication Services Tax
SECflON 3: METIlOOOLOGY (INCLUDE ASSUMPI'IONS AND ATfACH DETAILS)
1. Split of wireless subscribers between residential and non-residential mirrors that of the wireline customers
2. Price differential between residential and non-residential wireless subscribers is negligible so that wireless taxbase
can be split into residential and non-residential component based on the corresponding split of wireline customers
3. Both residential and small business customers may have a residential service address.
4. High and low estimates are based on a 5% swing in the taxbase split
SECTION 4: PROPOSED FIsCAL IMPACT
___~m__~""""'_"~'='-
FY 2005-06
act· ,A \ Funds FY 2005-06 AnnuaHzed Cash
I High ($442.0m) ($405.201)
...' .-'- ' -+--.,
f~~$~
FY 2006-07
Cash
(S514,9m)
".." ($~~:~5m))_~ -I
, ($452.101) i
_~<"«,,,,~~~___-3
SECTION 5: CONSENSUS E/i,TIMA TE (AOOPTED 2/18/ 05 The conference adopted the middle estimate,
FY 2005-06
FY
Gemm,¡J Revenue
State Trust
T otaI State 1m act
Rcvencuc Sharing
Local Gov't Half Cent
Total Locallmf!act
Total Impact
FY 2005-0{í Annualiz-ed
(366.8)
(.9)
(367.7)
(12.1 )
(35.2)
(47,3)
(415.0)
(336,2)
(.8)
337.0
(11.1)
(32.3 )
__.-543.4) ...
(380.4)
(427.4)
( 1.0)
428.4)
(14,1)
( 41.0)
(55.1 )
(483.5)
...
'-'
....,
ANNEX 1
ridaed rac er: L osaulto ontro
Project No. Amount Description Status
FB001M $65,256,00 Aerial Treatments - 90% Submitted
FB002M $1,899.36 Land Treatments - 90% Submitted
FB003M $65,256.00 Aerial Treatments - 100% Submitted
FB004M $8,073,74 Land Treatments - 100% Submitted
FB005M $206,236,33 Emeraencv Clearina / Reoairs - 90% Submitted
FB006M $65 250.99 Emeraencv Repair of a Breach Submitted
JB001M $32,442,05 Aerial Treatments - 90% Submitted
JB002M $19,013,39 Land Treatments - 90% Submitted
JB003M $77 544,00 Aerial Treatments - 100% Submitted
JB004M $198,153,65 Emeraencv Clearina / Reoairs - 90% Submitted
JB005M $10,194,10 Emeraencv Clearina / Reoairs - 100% Submitted
JB006M $30,368,31 Forced Account Labor & Eauioment (Road & Bridae Div,) for "JB004M" Submitted
FE001 M $137,056,31 Restoration of Pumpina Stations Submitted
JG001M $1,149,007.25 Permanent Dike Restoration - Phase 1 QA-in-Proaress
JG002M $4064656,21 Permanent Dike Restoration - Phase 2 Work-in-Proaress
FB007M $48,785.39 Ground Applications - Materials Cat B-in-orocess
JBOO7M $86,630.44 Ground Applications - Materials Cat B-in-orocess
In-process $501,268,00 Blind Creek Park Relocation - Mitiaation In-orocess
In-process $23,520.00 Fishing Pier Repairs In-orocess
In-process $116,620,00 Enaineerina
In-process $11,427.05 3 culvert replacements In-process
Ab
T k
S C/M
C
$6,918,658.57
Attached is the list of Project Worksheets submitted,
In short, the PWS reimburse the District for aerial and ground larviciding, emergency protective measures (labor, etc,), electro-
mechanical failures/repairs (flooding of motors and panel boxes at pump stations require replacements) and dike repair,
Dike repairs took place in several phases,
First, fallen trees and tipped-over stumps were removed from 34 miles of dikes;
Second. rip rap scattered over the dikes was relocated to the edges of 10.4 miles of dikes;
Third, dike breaches and heavily scoured areas were re-constructed with fill to allow vehicular access;
Fourth (and final stage). involves replacement of the shoreline filter fabric (where necessary) and re-installation of shoreline rip
rap, covering the dikes with filter fabric (that is sewn onto the shoreline fabric and buried), covering the new filter fabric with
coquina road base and fill (and large rip rap along shorelines), and injecting grass seed/mulch into the cover fill along the
shoreline of 17,1 miles of dikes,
We also have several more PW.'s in-process for engineering reimbursement. culvert repairs, two fishing pier repairs and Blind
Creek Park Ocean-to-River clean-up and parking lot relocation mitigation,
RESIDENTIAL WIRELESS SERVICE
I. TAXBASE DETERMINATION
ba$ed Qff Distri/mtiolf Data and Tax Rates
YOl102 - 8 mtbs actual
01/02. 12 m'lIs implied
FY 03-04
avg(a,D,E)
(C. A)
A
TOTAL
25.4%
70.2%
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
II, TAXIJASI\ mSAGGlUWATION
baM{J Of'! T áXp(J.,>-'\~r i~~l{l an CST })atab-¡Jsr.
. lO.8%þrf'D1!S;5,'
III. RESIDENTIAL WIRELESS
FYl003/04
TOTAL
77%
23%
100%
3,706.91 49%
3.810,68 51%
7,511.9 100%
R@ìthm~¡í\f
Middle
305.$0 77%;
Z:J~e
S,de;y Tax Cømlrp:tiMt (in "$ m)
Hìgh
¡>Ow
Lines
wIR.EL1NE
Tuba,e (in 5 m)
Residentia.l
NonuResidential
32$.6>
71A1)
fG%,
!$~{\
285.94
;W-1J4 lOtl~\¡.
391,t4
l.GO"/it
8,605
W.25~
51.31/'J
14.2%
19. 1 ~~4
SALtSTAX(:OJ\11'ON~ ON usm~wlRELESS sUlVlCE (in 5 m)
MIddle IDgh
305,$0 32565
356,25 16.5% 319,38
415.03 16.5% 441.98
4113.50 16.5% 514.90
SFY03/04
SFYIW05
SF'l05106
SF'lOtîlO1
SFYIJ5/06 Cash
16.5'11
165%
16,5%
Low
285,94
333,12
388,08
452.11
16.5%
16.5%
16,5%
Arrm!<\\ Gft)\Of'th :'.\'f'AT CAGR
'Jttfl--ÛO
JttilAjJ
Jün-Ü2
49$}
«
--
'-' ........
..., ...."
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
Agenda
Friday, February 18, 2005
..' - ...
7:30 a.m., Conference Room # 3
St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex
""\
.
Convene meeting
Roll Call, announcements
Minutes
....
1. Strategic Planning Session - Review of Hurricane Recovery Efforts
2. Budget-in-brief Document /~
3. Downtown Ft. Pierce Building Projects Update.
4. St. Lucie County Bail Agent Association - Presentation
Adjournment
Next CBC meeting: March 18, 2005
"
'-~
., """"
FROM:
COUNTY ADMINISTRATION
MEMORANDUM
05-23
TO:
DATE:
RE: Downtown Fort Pierce Projects
Below is a list of projects with the estimated project cost, construction timeframe, and
funding source.
Clerk of Courts Buildinq
Construction Time Frame ......................................... May 01,2005 - November 05,2006
Estimated Project Cost ... ............. .............. ....... ........... ...................... ........... $6,900,000 '
Funding Source - FEMA .......0..'...0.... .............0......0........ 0.....0..· .... 0....··..·0.... 0...... 0" 155,357
Down Payment - Other Facilities Impact Fees .................................................. 1,000,000
2004 General Fund Transfer....................................................·....··..............·...... 900,000
2004 Capital Budget - Fund 316.........................................·......·..·..·....·............·.. 922,908
Bond Proceeds Being Paid by Other Public Facilities Impact Fees .................. 3,000,000
Sales Tax Bond Issue 2003.......................................·......·..·......·....·........·.... $ 921.735
Total . .............. ...... ............... ..... .................... ........ ............. ........ $6,900,000
Monumental Staircase
Construction Time Frame ................................................ May 01,2005 - March 07, 2006
Estimated Project Cost ................................................................................. $1,238,000 '
Funding Source - Bond Issue Being Paid by Other Public Facilities Impact Fees
District Coolinq
Construction Time Frame......................................·.. April 15, 2005 - December 01, 2005
Estimated Project Cost. ................. ....... ........................................................ $1,910,000
Funding Source - Bond Issue Being Paid by Other Public Facilities Impact Fees
Old Courthouse Renovation - 4 New Courtrooms
Construction Time Frame/Renovation...........................August 01 ,2005 - June 05,2006
Construction Time Frame/Remove-Replace .................January 01 ,2006 - July 01, 2007
Estimated Project Cost (if facility is renovated) ................................................$4,546,875
Funding Source - Insurance, FEMA, and Revenue Source to be Determined
'.
'-' .....
..., .."",
Page 2
February 14, 2005
Downtown Fort Pierce Projects
Downtown Parkinq Garaqe
Construction Time Frame...............................··..·..· August 01,2005 - February 07,2006
Estimated Project Cost ......... ............................... ....... ............ ............. ......... $2,500,000
Funding Source - Fort Pierce CRA
Please let me know if you have any questions.
DMAlab 05-23
c: Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Faye Outlaw, Assistant County Administrator
Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney
Marie Gouin, Management and Budget Director
Roger Shinn, Central Services Director
Don McLam, Assistant Central Services Director
'-' ...,.
'WJi' ...,
ST. LUCIE COUNTY BAIL AGENT ASSOCIATION
P.O. BOX 4114. FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34948. (772) 370-2424· FAX (712) 461-3887· EMAIL: SLCBAA@AOL.COM
February 10, 2005
Dr. Doug Anderson
St. Lucie County Administrator
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, FL 34982
I
~}~\)\')"1
~ ~.
() ~..
~),
'I
r .~
'JO )'"
, b' t
() I;
{ r'\
1
/'ì
f'
Mr. Anderson:
Please accept this letter as a request to be put on the agenda for the next Citizens
Budget Development Committee meeting. In response to the ILPP Criminal Justice
study, I am interested in presenting a short overview of how the bail bond business
works and what it provides for St. Lucie County citizens.
Thank you for your attention to this matter. Please contact me at (772) 461-2420,
should you have any questions.
Sincerely,
fEB I 4 2005
Mitch Hilburn, President
I ,\
.-
· (1-
L,.
7:30 a.m., Conference Room # 3 _/""
St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex C ¡J ê ! P
DC-Ù
(P(o'ú~v
L( !''vd V rJ (
~ \.f1 ./
, /)
3 t)
;'
'-'
~
ì
'-'
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
Agenda
Friday, January 21,2005
Convene meeting
Roll Call, announcements
Minutes
1.
Reorganization.
- Citizens' Budget Committee Chairman
- Citizens' Budget Committee Vice-Chairman
2.
Hurricanes update - Power Point Presentation.
3.
Budget for FY 2005-2006.
4. Emergency Reserves and Lines of Credit
"""
Ý I- S~r) // J-
b~~~
5. Strategic Planning Session - February 17, 2005 @ 8:00 a.m. in the
IRCCjSchreiber Conference Center, Port St. Lucie.
Adjournment
Next CBC meeting: February 18, 2005
\...
.."".
..."
Draft
....
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: November 19, 2004
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:30 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: Jaqueline N. Burke, Lilly Miller, Ron Parrish, Paul Young, William "Bill"Casey,
Edward Lounds, Troy Ingersoll, Patricia "Pat" Ferrick, Carl Hensley, Linda Bartz,
MEMBERS ABSENT: John Knapp, Toby Philpart, Debbie Hawley, Steven Messer.
OTHERS PRESENT: Larry Daum, Faye Outlaw, Marie Gouin and Doug Anderson.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA;
New CBC members - Introductions
Staffwe1come committee's newly appointed members: Jaqueline N. Burke (Comm. Smith), Lilly Miller (Comm.
Smith) and Toby Philpart (Comm, Coward) and we congratulate Ed Lounds and Troy Ingersoll who have been
reappointed to the committee (both by Comm. Craft). New members present introduced themselves.
December meeting.
Doug inquired if committee members would agree to move the regularly scheduled meeting in December.
Several members expressed scheduling conflicts due to other commitments and agreed they could wait until
the January meeting to discuss the updates on the pending matters. Ed moved to cancel the CBC meeting
scheduled for December 2004, Ron seconded the motion and all members voted in favor.
MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the October 29,2004 meeting, Ron moved for approval
and Troy seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and the motion passed.
Hurricanes Update
Staff updated committee several aspects of the hurricane recovery process, such as debris removal, the
County's financial exposure, progress on Indian River Dr. emergency repair (staff agreed to update the
committee on the progress of the Indian River Dr. repair at a future meeting).
Video "September to Remember".
Staff played the video entitled "A September to Remember", prepared by our Media Relations division, which
compiles images taken at St. Lucie County and during hurricanes Frances and Jeanne.
Committee members and staff discussed briefly the great efforts staff has been making to speed up the
recovery process to the maximum.
Civic Center - Special Needs Center
Doug related to committee members the circumstances under which the Civic Center had to be closed as the
County's Special Needs Center and the measures staff had to take to accommodate county residents with
most urgent medical attention during hurricane Jeanne.
He also listed the different repairs that the Civic Center will require to be an acceptable facility (skin the roof
to repair, test air quality, install new air conditioning system, etc.).
Bill Casey had too leave to attend another commitment. Pat nominated Carl Hensley to continue presiding
the meeting and Troy seconded the nomination. There were no other nominations. Members voted all in
favor.
Committee members and staff discussed the need of a Special Needs facility within our county for emergency
situations, such as what we went through with the hurricanes. Members considered making a
recommendation to the BOCC, regarding this matter.
Troy moved to state The CBC's support to starrs recommendation to make the necessary repairs (roof
replacement, AIC, and door openings to accommodate the portable stage and bleachers) to make the
Civic Center functional again as a spacial needs shelter and events facility. Lilly seconded the motion.
...,.
u
w
'WI
All members voted in favor.
Emer2encv Reserves and Lines of Credit
Doug handed out a spreadsheet with information obtained by staff from other Florida counties, comparing
their emergency and contingency reserves with St. Lucie. He pointed out some counties don't even have any
contingency or emergency reserves.
After the hurricanes disaster, St. Lucie will have to start to replenish and increase the emergency funds from
$0 and the goal may be to go up to about $10MM and establish a period of years to achieve this goal.
Some members expressed their concern about setting these funds at such a low level, considering the
magnitude of this recent disaster. They proposed the goal should be based on a percentage, so that it would
increase proportionally every year together with the budget (and other parameters, such as cost of living,
inflation, etc.),
After some discussion on this matter, staff and members decided to table this matter for the January meeting.
This way staff will have time to prepare more information for this committee to review, The CBC may
recommend then a set percentage and maybe recommend to the BOCC that they direct staff to include it as
part of the County's financial policy.
Tourist Tax - Loss of Hotel/Motel rooms
Larry Daum, Economic and Tourist Development Manager briefed CBC members on the situation on hotel
availability (please refer to hand out for details). He is mostly concerned about the condos (Ocean Village,
The Courtyard and others). Staff continues to monitor the situation and will be giving updates on this matter.
Strate2ic Plannin2 Session with DOCC
Doug reminded CBC members the Strategic Planning Session with the BOCC is scheduled for February 17,
2005 @ 8:00 a.m. in the IRCC/Schreiber Conference Center, Port St. Lucie.
NEXT MEETING
The next CBC regular meeting is scheduled to be held on Friday, January 21, 2005 at 7:30 a.m., in
Conference Room # 3 of the St. Lucie County Roger Poitras Administration Annex . Topics to be discussed
will include an update on the issues discussed at this meeting.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 855 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
William "Bill" Casey, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
November 19, 2004
H:IO Secrefary\O OMB\CBC\MinIMin04\1119,wPd
page 2
~
St. Lucie County, Florida
Citizens' Budget Committee
Agenda
Friday, January 16, 2004
7:30 a.m., Conference Room #3
St. Lucie County Administrative Annex
1. Convene meeting
1.1 Roll Call, announcements
1.2 Re-organization
1.2.1 Chairperson ¡Jv¡Y
1.2.2 Vice--Chair
1.3 Minutes
2, Old Business
2.1 5 Year Budget
2.1.1
2.1.2
2.2 5 Year Capital Budge
Adjournment. Next CBC meeting: February 20, 2004 . ~
vJ ill/} ·
\ ~/ ~r'"~ (f
d- \ '6 r / Sf-..·1
If 0( A /'
{/Ô ?,,~~
I¡J /fP ,j
F'xI~ ~ £7 r
Ó¿)T
r
'-'
.."",
Draft
CITIZENS' BUDGET COMMITTEE
Meeting Date: December 19, 2003
Conference Room # 3
Meeting convened at 7:35 a.m.
MEMBERS PRESENT: David F. Samuel, Kenny Hogan, Mark Taynton, Paul Young, William
"Bill"Casey, Debbie Hawley, John Knapp, Troy Ingersoll, Carl
Hensley, Steven Messer and Linda Bartz.
MEMBERS ABSENT: Ron Parrish, Ed Lounds, Sylvie Kramer and Patricia "Pat" Ferrick,
OTHERS PRESENT: ,Jennifer Hill, Doug Anderson and Marie Gouin.
RECORDING SECRETARY: Suzanne Antonetti
ANNOUNCEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA; None.
MEETING MINUTES
There being no corrections to the minutes for the November 21, 2003 meeting, David moved for
approval and Debbie seconded the motion. All members present voted in favor and the motion
passed.
Ad Valorem Taxes
At the previous meeting, a chart had been provided showing the increase in the County's property values.
There was a question as to how did this translate into Ad Valorem taxes collected in 2003.
Doug referred to two charts in this meeting's handout: the first chart lists the amounts collected in past years,
as well as the budgeted amount for 2003, and the forecast for the next five years. The second chart shows
a detailed breakdown of how the amounts collected are split among the different funds.
Request to Increase Staff
Doug stated he had invited Department Heads to this meeting to talk about personnel needs for St. Lucie
County BOCC for the upcoming Fiscal Years. He began discussion pointing out a chart included in the
meeting's handout, which shows the increase in personnel in the last 12 years.
Although the County's population has increased dramatically in recent years, staff has strived to hold the
line in terms of adding new positions. There was a dramatic reduction in personnel for Fiscal Year 1992-
1993 (53.4 Full time Equivalent - FTE - positions), and by Fiscal Year 1999-2000, we still had less positions
(686.15 FTE) than for Fiscal Year 1990-1991 (687.09 FTE). After a personnel survey was conducted in that
year, it was determined that due to increase in population and cost of living, staff was insufficient to cover
demands on service to the public and existing personnel was under paid, causing a lot of staff tumover and
difficulty to fill vacant positions. Consequently, salary and wages levels were adjusted and some new
positions were approved in more recent years.
Doug pointed out another chart: ·St. Lucie County BOCC Five-Year Plan - additional positions', which
describes the personnel requirements Department Heads have calculated for the years to come. The first
column in this chart shows the initial amount of positions they requested for the next Fiscal Year and after
further review, in an effort to hold the line on increasing the budget, they cut down their request to the most
urgent needs for personnel (second column shows the revised amount).
'-'
~
Central Services
Roger Shinn stated that, because his department serves the rest of the County's departments and agencies
and they are all growing, the need for more housekeeping and maintenance personnel is inevitable. The
County Administration building is being remodeled this year, the new County building at Walton Rd. will be
completed by October 2004 and two pods are expected to be added to the County Jail very soon, which will
mean a lot more square feet to keep up.
Doug added that Central Services staff also does other work, such as all the construction/carpentry work
(which saves the county money) and commended the Central Services department for the outstanding
quality of their work.
County Administration - Media Relations
Shane DeWitt stated SLCTV is growing rapidly and there will be more programming, such as the broadcast
(and "re-runs") of more meetings (e.g. Planning and Zoning Board, Code Enforcement Board, Contractor's
Licensing Board) and a public affairs type of program called Inside St. Lucie (there already is another
program called Progress St. Lucie, which shows on site interviews with project managers for capital projects
that are under construction). The new position requested will help cover the productions. Media Relations
also assists other county departments in presentations to the different Boards.
Public Works
Don West stated the request for personnel increase for Public Works is in response to the County's recent
demographic expansion and the expected growth. He also pointed out that the request for 11 positions is
a reflection of the many divisions grouped under this department.
He commended the excellent job the County's Grant Writers are doing in getting more grants forthe County,
but clarified that there is a lot of administrative work involved in handling the funds (such as seeing that the
costs are assigned to the right accounts and preparing reports to the granting agencies to get the
reimbursements), which takes a lot of time from the Project Managers, deterring them from completing the
projects in a timely manner; for this reason, he is requesting a position for Grants Administrator, to handle
this lengthy and detailed task (not complying with the granting agencies would translate into not getting
reimbursed and not qualifying for future grants, and in some cases may hurt the County's eligibility for other
grants).
Don continued to explain the rest of the positions requested for the other divisions in Public Works, such as
Engineering (1 Project Manager/Engineer), Solid Waste (2 positions for the Construction/Demolitions
Program), Road & Bridge (1 position to keep upthe roads landscaping), Environmental Resources (1 position
to help with the increased volume of vegetation permits that are being requested and 2 positions, which may
be out-source for care/custodial of the environmentally protected lands owned by the County), the Oxbow
(1 position to cover public demand for more programs, in response to the great success it has had with the
public) and Code Compliance (2 positions to keep the level of service to the public).
Aariculture
Marie stated Anita Neal was out of town and had requested her to explain the positions on her behalf.
An additional office for the Agriculture Extension Office will open at the Walton Road facility for customer
service and 1 position will be requested to cover it (to answer questions and perform clerical work). Also,
there is a request for an additional Extension Assistant to help with the school programs.
MOSQuito Control
The personnel increase that Jim David has requested for his department is to cover Mosquito Impoundment
operations (the amount of Mosquito impoundments have increased to 20 over the years and cannot be
maintained only by 2 people any more; it's needed for dike maintenance and to prevent proliferation and
eradicate exotic plants) and for part time "foggers" (to comply with State requirements).
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
December 19, 2003
page 2
'-"
"WI
Veterans
Paul Hiott explained the need for a part time Veterans Officer to cover the increase in public demands for
assistance in veteran's matters.
Community Services
The additional position Beth Ryder is requesting is to cover the need for assistance to the public in the
S.H.I.P Program (specifically to help low income families to apply for home repairs).
Public Safety
Jack Southard explained his Department needs 3 new positions to cover the increase in 911 calls (Central
Communications covers the whole county - not just the unincorporated area), which have multiplied
tremendously now that more people call from their cell phones.
Committee members and staff discussed possibility of educating the public in terms of not making calls to
911 ifthey are not emergency calls. Beth Ryder mentioned that the number 211 is up and running for family
crisis type of calls.
Librarv
Susan Kilmer stated that the large increase in personnel she is requesting over the next five years is to cover
the new facilities they are opening, to cover Sunday shifts and the increasing demand from the population,
specially for the use of computers.
Bill Casey commended the great service the Library is giving to the public.
Cultural Affairs
Jon Ward stated the increased personnel is due to the fact that this is a new Department that has taken over
the Museums Division. He is requesting 1 new position that will help him with the clerical work and to make
sure that the proper paperwork is submitted to Finance in a timely manner. The other 3 positions requested
are to cover facilities to be opened in the near future and to address the lack of proper maintenance the
artifacts in the museums have had until now (a curator). The museums are being restructured so that they
all achieve full accreditation by the American Association of Museums and a requirement is to properly
catalog and maintain the artifacts. This way, our museums will qualify for grants.
Information TechnoloQY
Dennis Wetzel stated his department will not be requiring added positions until Fiscal Year 2005-2006, but
because this department gives technical support to all the other County's departments and many of its
agencies, as they grow they will need to request additional personnel to cover the demand. He explained
the different aspects of Information Technology's support to the other departments.
Parks and Recreation
Pete Keogh described his departments needs for the next Fiscal Year. Staff intends to have activities at
the Fairground 52 weeks out of the year and aiming for that, they are requesting 4 more positions. Most of
the positions requested for this department are to cover the demands that the Parks Referendum will set off.
Airport
Paul Phillips stated they had originally requested 2 positions, but they have revised their request to 1
position: a Maintenance Technician for Commerce Park. This person will come on line late in 2005.
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
December 19, 2003
page 3
'-"
..",
Community Development
Dennis Murphy stated he had requested 3 positions that had to be revised, due to insufficient funds, in the
Unincorporated Fund. The revenues collected for the Unincorporated Fund are not enough to cover the
department's operations. He explained how the revenues are collected and from what areas and for what
expenses the department is responsible.
Committee members and staff discussed different aspects of this problem.
NEXT MEETING
Due to time constraints, issues to be discussed today were tabled for the next meeting. The next CBC
meeting will be held on Friday, January 16, 2004 at 7:30 a.m., in Conference Room # 3 of the St. Lucie
County Roger Poitras Administration Annex. Topics to be discussed will include continuation of discussion
of the SLC 5 Year Budget.
ADJOURN
Meeting was adjourned at 9:20 a.m.
Respectfully submitted by:
Reviewed by:
Suzanne Antonetti, Secretary
Kenny Hogan, Chairman
Citizen Budget Committee Meeting
December 19, 2003
H:\O SecretarylO OMBICBC\Min03\12'19,wpd
page 4
~
..""
ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOCC FIVE - YEAR PLAN
Additional Personnel- As Presented 12/19/03
Revised
Department FY04-05 FY04-05 FY05-06 FY06-07 FY07 -08 FY08-09 Total
Parks & Recreation
Aquatics 3 3 1 6.5 10.5
Subtotal 3 3 0 1 6.5 0 10.5
Revised
Deøartment FY04-05 FY04-05 FY05-06 FY06-07 FY07 -08 FY08-09 Total
Parks & Recreation
Aquatics 3 6 1 6.5 13.5
Subtotal 3 6 0 1 6.5 0 13.5
Additional Personnel - Revised
H:\5 Year Plan Positions.qpw
>
a:::
<C
:E
:E
::I
t/)
Z
<C
..J
a.
a:::
<C
w
>
I.t)
~
()
q
IJJ
>
I-
Z
::I
o
()
w
()
::I
..J
~
t/)
~.
'... I /)
),
Ii':
cn ..... 0 00 .....It) " N 0 ..... 0 0 0 " ..... M 0 .....0 I() 01
CD CD cn 00 cnN M " 0 0 CD 0 M ..... ~ cno N CD
ti-;;,./ ~ co M 00 cn..... CD Ii;;,./ N It) N o. o. co " ..... CDO " CD
~< ..... cn N 00 ..to co )-< CD ri tti ~ 0 cn Ñ N ..to M ~
'w<1- co CD M 00 cn..... CD wI- M " It) I() 0 M ..... 0 It) 0 " CD
;>0 ..... cn ..... It) It) CD CD I() >0 co It). It) CD. It) " CD N 00 CD <:)
¡¡:I- M co "cn M" 0 ¡¡:I- N ~ ..... N N ~ 0 ctio 0) 01
M 0 CO~ 0) CD ..... N Ncn 0)
..... ..... ;- M N M
ë , cn 0 ~ 0 0") .....It) 0 ..... 0 cn 0 0 0 cn 0 It) 0 ~o I() CD
..... cn M 0 0 MN 0 " 0 I'-- ~ 0 I'-- ..... cno co CD
W I'-- M 0 0 0+ cn.co 0). CD I'-- ~ 0 0 co. o. coo ~ ~
a:
< 0) M co I'-- 00 CD..... " 0) I'-- ~ ri N 0 It) N r-:o I() too.
a. oz M ~ CD 0 0,·· COl'-- 0 oz ..... ..... N It) 0 co 0 coo 0) CD
w 'åJ< It) CD ..... cn ..... .' ..... co ~ 'åJ< co cn M It) It) cn N CDO N CD
a: 0;;"/ cn M cnO) M- 0...1 I'--N ~ tticti I() ~
a. )-0. N N..... co )-0. It) ..... co
W LL LL
I- ,
<
0
N 0 co 0 0'; 00 0 cn 0 I'-- CD 0 0 co 0 N 0 0 N N
I'-- ..... ..... 0 ~¡I o It) I() ~ 0 M ..... 0 ~ N 0 0 " N
CD M M M 0 COM ..... CD ~ I'-- ..... NO It) CD I'-- O. CD I()
OZ qz . 0
N CD ~ 0 It) I'-- CD ~ ~ I'-- ..... CD, cn .....0 M too.
à:3 It) CO It) 0 00) 0) ~:3 CD ..... ..... ~ 0 CD ..... CD· 0 N N
CD I'-- N cn MM M 0 cn M It) It) cn ..... CO O. ~ <:)
~.,o. CO ..... CO cn ..... Ö )-0. It)N ~ It) CO N N
LL: ~ N N ..... CD .·LL It) It)-..... CO
CI) '-
0 cn ..... It) 00 cno I() N 0 CO ~ 0 0 CD I'-- It) 0 0 M CD
U ~ It) CD 00 CDO M M 0 ..... 0 0 cn M ~ CO 0 M 01
C ''''", Q cn M 0 00 ~cn " " M 1'--. cn CD 0 It). N CO I'-- 0 N ~
OZ ~ I'-- 0 It) 00 ÑCD Ñ oz N ~ 0 0 0 I'-- ~ CO CD 0 0) CD
z cb< It) cn CO 00 ~O CD .'cb < ~ ..... ..... M 0 ~ 0 M 0 0 CD <:)
::I 0,,;;"/ ~ 0 M M cn..... It)~ " 0;;"/ ~ cn M It) It) cn N 0 cn O. CO ~
U. ~o. I'-- ..... I'--cn ..... ,..: )-0. N N ~ CD. CO 0) N
~:~ ¡:: N N..... " LL It) It) ..... "
..J
<C æ ,'.
a::: 0 ..... It) 00 1'--0 M CO 0 N 0 0 0 It) I'-- ..... 0 0 M <:)
W It) ..... 0 00 MIt) I() I'-- 0 N 0 0 ..... M It) M 0 0 I()
Z M It) N 00 .....CD CD CD 0 I'-- CO N 0 0 N CD 0 0 " CD
N I'-- 00 N~ " OZ It) ~ ..t 0 0 cn ~ cn cn 0 " 01
W ..... :g:3
I() < I'-- CD It) 00 .....M M ~ ..... 0 N 0 N 0 It) Ñ 0 " (")
C) '0·;;,./ ..... M It) cn ..... .....~ CD cn cn. M It) It) 0) N cn cn O. N CD
~'o. It) ..... CDcn ..... ..... añ )-0. cn N M It) CO " ~
II.; N N..... " LL ~ ¿ ..... "
0) cn I'-- 0 0 ~O 0) ..... 0 It) 0 0 0 cn I'-- 0 0 0 N (")
I'-- cn CD 0 0 It) 0 0) ~ 0 ~ 0 0 cn M ..... CD 0 M (")
I()' 0 N I'-- 0 0 CD~ ;. I() I'-- I'-- CO 0 0 I'-- N 0 ~ 0 M ':-
oz It) M CO 00 I'--cn 9~ CD ~ CO 0 0 0 ~ N 0 0 " (")
"~"':3 CD CO CD 0 0 ~cn CD ..,. CD ..... 0) ..... 0 ..... 0 CO ....: 0 CD N
I'-- I'-- I'-- cn ..... It)~ M 0 It) cn N It) It) cn N CO cn 0_ "::. ~
~,o. N 0 It) cn ~N M )-0. I'-- N M ~ CO ..,. ~
II.; N N..... " LL ~ LÔ ..... "
? .
M M ~ ~ M '.'. NO 0) cn 0 It) 0 0 cn 0 I'-- N 0 CO I'-- 0) <:)
I'-- ~ M ~ a;, CON 0 I'-- 0 N 0 0 I'-- ~ M cn ~It) 0
..,.1- It) N 0 It) NCD ..... N 0 0) 0 0 CD cn N CO I'-- ..... .....
oW cn 0 ~ 0 I'-- ~It) N M It) CD 0 0 N N ~ It) It) ..... N
'c) It) 0 cn CD ~ cn M 0) ~ CD cn 0 0 I'-- cn 0 0 I'-- ..... 0)
So CD ~ CD CO '.. "CO N 0 0 N It) It) 0) CO N CO M 0 N
~::) 0 0 cn N ..... CD ~M N M CO 0 CD
LL£D N N ..... ..... . " ~ N "
éñ w
w m ::)
(. m I- .Q Z
-], Z z E "tJ W
W ... >
::) .¡ ~ ns
0. .. W
L_ X 0 0:: I() ~ 0::
" w :!E ID ID 1/1 0 ...I
< ~ 1/1
;;,./ go c: 1/1 ID I/ILL <
1/1 ,.... < oð ID ns ...I ID "tJ I-
"tI I- G) > ID 1/1 G) ID 0
1/1 c:: - m ï: ;;,./ + "'C II.;
<II c:: ê" 0 w ns ~ ID <II .¡;: I-
U ::3 <II ~ I- .t: c: 0:: ... ID oð ... C)
u. E I() u ~ ~ <II :¡ <II ns
c:: c:: m ~ ª- (J (J
~ too. 0:: c: 1/1 U c::
~ ,§. ~ <II ::) ID G) c: c: G) 0 ID
- E 0 ns ... :¡ G) CII
-~ J1 ~I .~ c:: 0 :¡ 0:: ï: ; ... E > 0. c: (J ~
G) E c: ID.Q ID
m (J <II ::. m G) ... ns :¡- 0 0:: "'C G) c: ex¡
"tI - I:: ILl J:: ID ~ _ns (J c:;;,./ > ns
W ::3 ~ 1/1 - - e C) nsW 0 U ... c:
m <II c:: CII "" ... ID - <IIÌj 0 ID ëG
ex¡ c::._ <II ~ ... ~ Z .2 m- "tJ ID 0:: ..
::) o! ~ ~ <II 0:: < > ID .t: £D £D m
g c::- 1/1 IDO:: ...
o e! - - i5 ns ... ID ns Õ - ... ::s::
C) U <II c:: ns - > ID ID ... - O:::J ~ c: ID "tJ
~ ~ c:: 1/1 <II Z - 1/1 c: 0::
Z ,- e! c:: - ns .t:.! ns .t:
- e! C) ~ ~ ::) "tJ 0 'm 0 0 Õ :¡ <
> i5 e! æO -~ - õ.s I-:W <
.. ¡";Q:: C) is LL < m u J: ;;,./ LL :!E
z ~ (J
::) CII CII W
LL 0 ~ U 0::
'"
S2
....
N
"
.~
a:
>-
D::
«
:E
:E
::>
t/)
z
~
0-
D::
«
w
>-
I(
~
u
d
cD
>-
I-
Z
::>
o
u
w
u
::>
...J
¡..:
t/)
ö
w
a::
0(
a..
w
a::
a..
w
~
0(
a
IUb
'~¡-
u...,. '
,,'::,.'!':-:.,:;-
. .>',-",~"
~
o
o
""
o
....
I
""
o
....
-
I?~I
qz
g~
).,'. ~
CI)
o
o
Q
~
¡::
fa
.;;\~
Q>if"';';;;'¡:
11.
t/)
c
z
::>
LL.
w
D::
::>
I-
W
LL.
D::
o
LL.
C
Z
«
w
z
u::
.¡-
oW
':'0
00
>-;:)
LL.m
r~
I~::I
..
en
W
en
;:)
o
z
f-..-,ë
z
;:)
u.
o CO '<I' 0
~,,~O
'<I'M CO 0
..-C')COO
CX)C"')..-O
It)oenlt)
..-<0<0..-
NCOCO
....
MMeno
en I'-M 0
I.OCO..-O
N..-C:OO
co (")..-0
........-r--('I')
~""r co
....M
I'-MI'-O
'<I'CO It) 0
CO'<l'COO
MNenO
NCOCOO
COlt)enM
'<I'M '<I'
....M
I'-NIOO
COCOMO
1010'<1'0
MCO'<l'O
101000
("')..-C"')(")
'<I'MM
....M
en en en 0
'<I'M 00
CO'<l'It)O
MOCOO
0)......,...0
Ol'-I'-M
'<I'N....
....M
'<1'0'<1'0
It)NOO
100.....0
I'-COCOO
'<1'....00
I'-'<I'NM
MNO
....M
CO.....("')Q)
OenNCO
COCOCON
NlOenM
NNCOIO
CONI'-N
MNCO
....N
~
'0
::¡
OJ
!,§
f!
I~
o
{j
~ r:::
III æ
r:::
I~ Ig
~ ~
QjC!lllll~
ê~~qa~
Of!III~~
~~~~f!
æO':o::(.!)
I~
I'
I:
~ .
I'..
t
"
~ô III
EIt)-
¡;;.... r:::
~~qa
~r:::E
ùjqa~
'50
Oð"-9
~ .! E
q¡~-
~~5
ùl.ê '9
~ ~
1""1
00 N
o ....
'<I' 0
N N
co N
...
co
It)
N
00
00
00
00
00
o
'<I'
N
co
00
00
MO
1'-1'-
.: It) 0 co M .... M en enlS It)
. ...... CO'<l''<I'COCOCOCON
'1i...J ..... 1'-. N o. 0 '<I' M co co
>-<co co....lt)....en'<l'co'<l'
. .¡- N 0 co co I'- co co co '<I'
.. W:o It) co co '<I' .... co I'- 10 '<I'
>¡-It) N ....'<I'N ......It)
~____:N ..... I~.....
N
It)
o
CD
N
...
'"
It)
It)
MOM I'- co It) co co'ã; It)
M enMNl'-lt)CONN
M en....I'-It)Men'<l'en
o Ñaï~"""r:r;jr:r;jr:r;jr:r;j
.... I'-I'-0COOlt)I'-CO
en co CO....MCCCO....It)O
'i':Z:5 a) N ..... ri
co '<I'
o
~ 11...
co
CD
en
It)
It)
'<I'
M
It)
H/:
.......
"". <00 CC It) ... M en 0 Ô It)
M MNIt)<OMI'-CCN
t..:. en ... <0. I'- It) <0 co. "':. en
r- I'- It)It)COOOIt)I'-CO
~ã" C '<I' en I'- en It) en It) '<I' co
N Lt)..-Na)Lt).....\t)O
~ N ~M
'<I' 0 .... .... M <0 <0 '<I'I~ It)
M It)COenCCM....MN
':. .' 0 La ..... co CX) ~ co ..... C')
,:qZ co en Ñ Ñ M M N I'- r:r;j
cø 0) .....,....O)M,.....\o..-CO
Lt).....C\lCX)t()..-Lt)O
Ñ I~M
0<0 It) 0 It) co co'ã; It)
C'OOLt)('I')..........CON
..... CO..... \0 LOCO MO')
<ocol'-I'-<oenl'-co
'<I'<OCO....It)'<I'COCC
~.....NCO\C').....'llltO
N I~M
o co It) 0 It) co o'íô It)
.....ØNO..-CONN
en'<l'It)It)It)CONen
:....¡.CC'<I' '<I'1t)........O <0 CO CO
"O....J .... I'- <0 co 0 '<I' '<I' It) co
'it 11. co M .... N co It) .... '<I' 0
...." ~ N ::: M
M
co
It)
'<I'
...
...
...
It)
....
'"
I'-
N
co
co
co
'<I'
en
....
o
CD
It)
....
CD
'<I'
...
en
co
It)
co
o
It)
'<I'
,::.:'''>: N
~8~ooenoo~1'-
"'OI'-It)OCOIt)OCO~
.:"'." en Ili It) N O. I'- <0 0 en en
:::lñg~¡e~~;~gJ
...M....N....NI'-It)....!~N
.......,.
ci)
W
en
Z
W
11.
)(
W
...J
~
o
¡-
¡
,
..
C/I
ë;; !~
! .!"'"
.!ëñc.E:g:ä
.5 f-oð GI:t
qa"C/I...JC
oð..C.!GI.....O
...: C/I_C/lqa""u.
.fi ;oð;U.:g-g
C/I:g~ U.:g~æ~'E
CD .... C'al~ = Q) N UI EO
~.:2 ..JI~ GI u. J: -.. :g U
l-ãíE'2Gi...::E~::IGI
E't: 0 ....=~0"t: C g
qa .? ù: W.., ~ W ~ C ~ ..,
....... ... Q)-
.2oð.!øo~g~a:Æ
~:g~e~~~~Gi"tl
"tI.51!.!OOOO::;§
<u.l-c.............Ou.
," CI)'
I-
Z
;:)
o
::E
<
oð
en
W
u
a:
;:)
o
en
CJ
Z
ë
Z
;:)
u.
;:;
o
~
;:)
I-
en
::E
N
M
o
N
N
...
CD
It)
N
It)
o
CD
N
...
en
It)
It)
co
CD
en
It)
It)
'<I'
M
It)
M
co
It)
'<I'
...
...
....
It)
co
en
I'-
N
co
co
co
'<I'
co
,..
o
CD
It)
,..
CD
'<I'
....
en
co
It)
co
o
It)
'<I'
Iii
::I
Z
W
>
w
a:
..J
<
I-
o
I-
~......
õ
~
o
o
I¡;
I::::
o
'#-
M
"C
Q)
ñí
.5
êií
~
.c
"C
~
.2
:§
c
.2
"5
Õ
UI
Q)
a:
;:)
f-
rn
:::¡¡
-=
'j
I~
E
o
<.J
.9
'<I'
o
>-
U.
,S;
Q)
C/I
nI
Q)
t!
,S;
'#-
It)
II
M
o
....
õ
~
o
W
U
Z
:5
<
ŒI
"C
c:
::>
~
E
o
-=
,S;
'-
.æ
UI
c:
..,
.=
~
)0-
c:::
<
:rE
:rE
:J
C/)
Z
<
..J
a.
c:::
<
w
)0-
I()
u
u
o
CD
)0-
I-
Z
:J
o
U
w
U
:J
..J
¡..:
C/)
ö
w
a:
<
a.
w
a:
a.
w
I-
<
o
N
o
T'"
-
C/)
W
U
s:
c:::
w
C/)
c
W
I-
<
c:::
o
a..
c:::
o
u
z
Z
:J
'"
Q
....
-
N
't>
"
VI
;;
"
a:
en
I-
Z
W
::e
::e
R
£i....;J
><
WI-
>0
u:1-
(I)
oz
~:)
>0.
LL.
co
OZ
~:)
>'0.
u.. µ)
¡...;.
CI)
o
t-- m U
O<Z
cóðfi}
~"a. ¡..;;
LL ~
¡::
CI)
co. UJ
O'Z
.....:)
.10
o
>0.
LLc
10
OZ
~:)
>0.
LL
..,1-
oW
'0
Sa
>::1
LLm
en
W
en
::I
o
Z
Õ
Z
::I
LL
~ .
.
,
:;
I'- 0) 0 0 0"
ON 0
COO) 0 r-
~~ ~ ','
COCO I'-
,..0
,.. ,..
... ........
O)MOO 00
'<t"'<t" 0 0
(00) 0 0
0) Ll) 0 0
(0 co Ll) Ll)
Ll)N ,..
NN
01'-00
MCO 0
(0(0 0
1'-(0 0
'<t"N Ll)
'<t"N ,..
NN
(0(000
I'-Ll) 0
M'<t" 0
0Ll) 0
COLl) Ll)
M ,.. ,..
NN
COOOO
OCO 0
NI'- 0
NI'- 0
,..0) Ll)
MO ,..
NN
'<t"'<t"00
'<t"(o 0
0)0 0
Mo) 0
(O'<t" Ll)
,.. 0 ,..
NN
1'-,..0Ll)
COM M
MLl) I'-
I'-N M
,..M N
01'- ,..
N ,..
.
. :
,
.
>
",
;':
I.::
I
.
f
oooco
o M
o t--
(0 ..,
N co
M t--
M
N
00
o
Ll)
0)
(0
00
o
o
0)
(0
00
o
o
..¡
CO
00
o
Ll)
M"
Ll)
0)0
0)
(0
(0
o
N
~
( c:: 1: ~
~ ::: Q <::I !II
c:: u.. EIn1:
~ I~ .è~Ë
~ ~.~ ~ Q
-~ ~ UJJ:::"
~.S~~:è ~~ª
~~'t;~1: ~~.§
~QC::(ca c::CU_
Q.£, ~ Q ~ ·...I~ ca
c.. 0 ¡..;; a: (!) "ßI~ ~
ca ca
:æ U
-
~
~
:::
CC
g.
....
~
~
o
(OONOO
. co (o'<t"O
. ~';;J Ll) ,.. co 0
><1'- COI'-O
W'I- Ll) 0 co 0
>0 O. N,.. 0
_1-1'- ,..Ll)
LL.. ,..
N
(I)
10
10
10
o
10
0)01'-0)0
(I).Ll) 0)00
OZN NO)O
c:òc:(N MNO
0~Ll) '<t"'<t"0
>0.1'-. NO
LL M ,..
I'-
....
CO
M
(I)
CO
..,
OOCO(OO
co CO '<t"'<t"0
9ZLl) -.r,..0
t--c:(M NCOO
O~I'- -.rMO
>a.Ll) NO
LL' M ,..
....
M
~
..,
10
I'-
..,
00(0(00
............. ,.. ,.. I'- 0
OZ'<t" (O'<t"O
CÓ' . M ,.. M 0
0,.:)0 '<t"MO
>o.'<t" NO
. M ,..
CO
co
(I)
M
..,
co
..,
'0
.>
MOOCOO
'<t" 00)0
M COCOO
,.. ocoo
-.r '<t"NO
N NO
M ,..
CO
o
10
co
....
..,
..,
':);:~ 0 8 ~ 8
8:z 0) 0 '<t" 0
~<(O 0..,0
..·o,.;;;J co '<t" N 0
">:0. 0 NO
LL ... ... M ,..
N
10
M
o
co
o
..,
....
~ Ll)00
M ,..,..0
. .... co 0 0 0 0
,Ll) MOO)
TCO MN(o
TN NO)
..
en
w
()
Z
w
a.
><
w
...J
c:(
l-
e
I-
en
I-
Z
::I
e
::e
<
O/S
en
W
u
ex::
::J
a
en
o
Z
Õ
Z
::I
LL
><
III
I-
CD "0
U '-
~ III
CD ~
en 0
(f (f LL
s:: Q "0
o QQ
::; LL;:
:ß~(O/S~
~s::g:ßU
1-::1 ::IQ
E s:: s:: u
E E ~ Q s::
Q W>IO
'- 0 Q ~
.S!Uêiíex::a¡
III-Q'-
>ca,-Q"O
UQ.s::C
~.3ëõæ
...
I'-
co
10
M
M
"'t
M
N
â)
..,
~
....
M
~
(Q
(Q
'<t"
=
M
o
10
CD
N
....
I'-
:s.
10
I'-
....
..,
10
co
..¡
Ñ
-.r
(Q
(I)
~
N
o
~
co
I'-
~
..,
â)
N
~
CD
t::.
f-
....
..,
o
¡::
..,
(I)
N
M
:::
....
....
10
..,
M
o
~
....
10
M
..,
~
o
'::
10
!£
N
10
CO?
o
co
o
..,
o
W
::I
Z
W
>
w
ex::
..J
c:(
I-
a
I-
w
U
Z
:)
c:(
a¡
>-
ex:
<
~
~
:J
en
z
<
..J
a.
ex:
<
w
>-
It)
u
u
o
IJJ
>-
....
Z
:J
o
U
w
U
:J
..J
~
en
ë
w
cz:
<
a..
w
cz:
a..
w
I-
<
C
..,
~
....
¡;¡
-0
"
~
"
0::
....
en
~
Z
W
....:E
'. :E
R
ci,.j
>-'<
w~
>0
~~
en
oz
cò<:
0...1
;>0 a.
LL..
en
CI
Z
:J
LL.
..J
o
ex:
I-
Z
o
U
o
t:
:J
o
en
o
~
co .
o'z
~:1
;>0 a.
u.:i' µ,
~
CI)
o
<.., (J
9:zc
.(0,..< !JJ
O¿;.J~
~a..q:
LL.." =æ
¡::
CI)
iCÓ'iT' LIJ
"~j:~
Q";.J
~
¡~-<
0¡';.J
.)-, a..
u....
C?~
oW
ÑC)
00
>:::1
LL..ID
,.
en
w
en
:::I
C)
Z
ë
z
:::I
u..
10 10
'<tCO
10 """
IO<C
<C'<t
<CCO
r--O)
0)0)
'<to
(") CO
'<t'<t
NCO
r--O
",,"N
CO",,"
(") CO
NO
0)10
NN
<CO
",,"N
(") """
10 10
<CCO
r--r--
(,,)<C
10 0)
""" """
<CN
<CIO
10 10
0",,"
10 """
'<to)
""" """
0) N
(")0)
r--CO
(,,)<c
NIO
(") CO
""" """
(")r--
10 0)
NO
Or--
'<t """
Nr--
""" """
~
"tJ
::J
en
~
e
I~
o
C/
cu
~
cu
C/
cu
a::
+
C/
QI
U
c::
I~
~
Q;! g
c::._
c::-
o e
~ QI
æ8
~."
--
<CO
0)0
NO
0)10
r--r--
10
COO
NO
COO
r--IO
CO..-
..-
r--O
<CO
(")0
r--IO
0)..-
r--O
<CO
(")0
r--IO
0)..-
r--O
<CO
(")0
(")10
..- ..-
"""
r--O
<CO
(")0
(")10
CO ..-
r--O
N
..-
CO
..-
..-
-
~
tJ
o
..J
- +
~IO U
~IO-
¡;: /'0. c::
I.S~ ~
::! c:: ¡;:
I~ ~ ~
;:;0
Oð ~19
I~'iä.§
.se~
-¡:;-
ù";::"ª
~ ~
=æ u
.::
tJ
-
~
=æ
to
N
<?,
to
to
....
CO
....
"C::' ...:¡
>-<
W~
>0
LL~
to
CO
0)
....
....
q
'<t
0)
Oz
~:1
>-a.
u..
to
CO
to
to-
to
r--
CO')
CO
oz
,..:.<
O...J
;>0 a.
u.
....
r--
CO
r--
....
to
CO')
r--
(jIZ
. CD<
0...1
";>0 a.
u.
10
CO
"!:
o
0)
'0:1'
CO')
CD'
,O·Z
.n;<
O,·;;.j
>a.
u..
CO
0)
0)
CO
r--
N
CO')
. '10-·'
,,(jIZ
''0:1'<
'-'O·...J
'>- a.
u.
r--
.....
'0:1'
10
.....
<?,
CO')
..
en
W
en
Z
w
a.
X
W
;.J
<
~
o
~
o COle;; 10 '<t
r--",,"OCO
100 CO CO
0)0010
(,,)IOCO"-
COI~ ..- 0
CO N
..-
(")Ir::: r-- '<t tOl
OCO'<tN CO,
(") CO '<t ..- 0).,
~ ~ ~ «; ;:
~I:::: '<t ~_,
1....
r--IO..-N to
O(")O)N CO
0)0r--0 to
r--CON'<t CD,
Nr--(")CO CD
10:::: (") .....
(") CO')
N(")CO'<t ....
..-O'<t..- .....
O)CO"""'<t CI:!.
0) 0) N 10 .....'
IOCO(")O) ....
("):::: (") ~:
(") CO')
.....
CON CO(") 0 It)
..-r--..-N CO
0)10 10 CO '0:1',
0)""",,,,"0 0
O)CO(")N 0)
....:::: '<t '0:1'
(") CO')
O)ÑO",,"
(")NOCO
100)0)'<t
r--(")O'<t
'<t1O(,,)1O
0,:::: (")
(")
col-
..-NO"-
'<tNOCO
NO)OO)
000(")
O)'<t(")CO
N:::: N
en
~
Z
:::I
o
:E
<
cð
en
w
(J
c::
:J
o
en
C)
Z
ë
z
:::I
u..
)(
I':
~ "
E ~
QI I':
.2 ~
I': u..
> "
" QI
üi < "¡:
QI....QI ~
U U:J CO
~-C (J
:J .:: QI
enorn~ ~
o c
~ c:: I':
Oo~ -
I~.'!: QI .... IDCO
:J .c: rn
:ElcÕ ~"
....rn cuC
rno ....:J
:J:E<Cu..
CD
N
o
CD
CD
....
CO
....
CO
0)'
"1
CO
.....
N
CO')
.....
.....
'0:1'
It)
.....
o
CO')
W
:J
Z
W
>
W
c::
...J
<
I-
o
I-
..
en
~
c::
<
:E
w
a:::
'-'
Ô
I::::::'
o
IÕ
I::::::'
-
::
I-
o
Õ
::::::.
o
w
(J
Z
<I:
...J
<I:
CD
>-
~
<
:E
:E
:J
tJ)
Z
<
~
a.
~
<
w
>-
It)
(,)
(,)
o
aJ
>-
I-
Z
:J
o
(,)
w
(,)
:J
~
¡..:
tJ)
ö
w
a::
<
0..
W
a::
0..
w
~
<
o
C"I
g
r0-
c;¡
"
"
..
.;:
"
c:
(J)
.~
Z
,......~
:¡¡
!:,'R
r:i..J
><
WI'-
>0
Ü:..~
,.,-'
en
oz
00<
o..J
>a.
IL
c
Z
:J
u.
~
o
a::
I-
Z
o
(,)
z
o
tJ)
o
~
w
CO-
'O'Z
'~<
·O..J
>-:a.
U- CI)
~
CI)
o
t-- (J
O,ZQ
cD<l1J
0,..J~
,> a. q:
u.. :E
¡::
CI)
UJ
'cor-.:-
OiZ
IÕ<
·O·..J
>a.
u:;.;'
.¡-,
'&0,'" .
:O'·Z
'~<
O..J
>a.
u..
~~
oW
MC)
00
>::::)
U-aJ
(J)
W
(J)
::::)
C)
Z
ë
Z
::::)
u..
cnco-
('\('\
cor--
T"" (")
('\(")
r--O
CO
T""
cnco
COCO
coo
I.Ocn
r--cn
T"" (")
(")
T""'¢
r--co
coo
00
r--o
T"" (")
(")
1.0 1.0
'¢'¢
cncn
CO(")
COO
T"" ('\
(")
or--
o('\
COCO
1.00
OT""
T"" T""
(")
'¢CO
('\('\
1.00
'('\O
O('\
T""O
(")
coo
(")1.0
~_O
cno
cnco
cn
('\
j
't¡
::¡
CIJ
g
-
-
~
~
o
UI
Q
C:
Q
UI
Q)
a::
+
UI
Q)
UI
c::
~
~
~g
c:: ._
c-
o ~
~ Q
æ8
r-..
I
.
u
00
o
1.0
'¢
..
00
00
00
,
00
'.'
.
"
-
~Iê' UI
¡::IO-
:ë5." c::
'- ioq. EQ)
~c::
li1Q)~
-S 0
o(Ià¡9.
~~.§
c::Q)-
_ þ;. ca
-5~'ª-
ca ca
::E (J
00
o
1.0
'¢
0(")
CO
o
CO
cn
'¢
,...
~
c:'-
en
~
,...
CD
..-
a::-.;J
>-<
W~
>0
ü:~
~
~
en
~
,...
~
M
en
,OZ
~:5
>-a.
u..
~
M
,...
o
,...
~
M
co
oz
~:5
>-a.
u.
o
en
~
o
,...
M
M
í!"-
qz
"CD <
·O·..J
>-a.
,u.
,...
N
N
CD
..-
~
M
CD,
,.OZ
&b<
: O..J
">a.
u.
o
~
o
,...
N
"';
M
..-
,...
"'!.
,...
,...
~
M
ù.i
(J)
Z
w
a.
X
W
..J
<
~
o
I-
COT""I.O(,,)
r--cn('\CO
'¢('\co'¢
T""CO(")CO
MOI.OCO
'¢T""('\cn
CO cn
T""I.OI.O'¢
r--('\ 1.0 0
r-- 1.0 r--. cn
'¢('\('\'¢
T""('\I.OCO
~ 0
T"" ('\
T""(")OT""
OCO('\(")
~O""'I.O
""'('\T""cn
,¢('\I.O'¢
(") 0
T"" ('\
cno 1.0 CO
MI.OOcn
('\CO,....('\
(")T""01.O
CO('\I.OT""
('\ 0
T"" ('\
NI.OOO
(")('\T""CO
T""N""'T""
('\T""cn(")
('\('\'¢('\
('\ cn
T"" T""
, "
I.OCOI.O(,\
MO("),....
cnCOr--1.O
(")OCO(")
CO('\'¢cn
T"" CO
.~
O·Z
-.t<
O..J
>-0..
u.
T"" T""
CO '¢
T""ocnr--
""'0,...."'"
""''¢'''''T""
""'0,....(")
O('\'¢'¢
T"" ('\
(J)
1-
z
::::)
o
:¡¡
<
cð
(J)
w
u
a::
::::)
o
CJ)
C)
Z
ã
Z
::::)
u..
"
~:;
~~
(/ 0
~u..
..J"
.. + .~
In In Q) t
Q) C ::::! CIS
~ X C::U
g ~ ~ C
CJ)E Q)g
L..C a::CIS
o L.. L.. CIS
-:O....Q),..,
...- In.:::......
:¡¡~eÕ"
ûí"C~ §
:J<C::<u..
,...
~
CO
cn
~
,....
CD
..-
In
In
cn
~'
,....
In
M
In
M
,...
o
.....'
~
M
o
cn
CO
0'
.....
M
M
.....
N
N
CD
..-
N
M
o
In
o
.....
N
..-
M
..-
.....
~
.....
.....
In
M
w
::::)
Z
W
>
w
a::
...J
<
I-
o
I-
..
(J)
~
a::
<
:¡¡
w
a::
,....
o
õ
.;;;;.
IÕ
I':::'
Õ
.:::.
-
o
o
o
W
U
Z
<
...J
<
aJ
>-
~
«
:!
:!
::J
CJ)
Z
«
..J
a.
~
«
w
>-
It)
CJ
CJ
o
CD
>-
1-.
Z
::J
o
CJ
w
CJ
::J
..J
t-=
CJ)
ö
w
a::
ct
0..
W
a::
0..
w
f-
ct
o
..,
Q
,...
Ñ
-0
"
..
";;;
..
a:
.
(JJ
....
Z
,W
~
....~
.. R
Q¿;;.i
>-<
W',J-
o
~....
LL.,
'. .,'
ai
:9z
co«
0'...1
>-a..
LL
-
o
~
'"""
-
,
CO
''Ï'"Z
,~ð
; >- a..
,IJ;;,.,... (I'
....
(I'
o
r-.. (J
q-zo
,to < I.LI
O...l~
(t,D.q:
V:·· ~
~;;.. æ
~~~
c
Z
::J
u.
.....
0::
o
a.
0::
<
, It):.
'o,,'z
>;.¢«
Q..J
'>-'a..
u..
~....
oW
Mt!)
00
>-:J
LLCD
(JJ
W
CIJ
::J
t!)
z
ë
z
:J
u..
101'
~CO
ON
COCO
01'
..- 10
«")CO
100
NI'
COCO
N"-
..-0)
f'--It)
..-
«")0)
CO~
o It)
Nit)
0) It)
COO
..-
o It)
~O)
COCO
CO~
NO
COO
..-
«")CO
NCO
..- ..-
«")1'
COCO
It)N
..-
~It)
0)0
«")0
«")1'
..- 10
lOCO
100
..- CO
..-CO
10«")
CON
~..-
~
"0
::
CO
.ê
-
~
~
o
C/
Q
~
Q
C/
Q
a::
+
C/
Q
C/
c::
~
~
~O
c: .E
C-
O ~
~ Q
~g
~....
.
f-
..-
..-
o
«")
10
..-
It)
~
o
It)
CO
..-
o
o
o
I'
I'
N
o
o
o
CO
N
o
CO
CO
o
N
..-
o
o
o
~
N
o
-
~C
-Ii)
S;,....
.:;: ~
;: c::
ùJ~
að::
~~
Q III
~§
U
III
~
CO
CO
..-
..-
0)
0)
N
CO
CO
I'
CO
It)
«")
«")
0)
0)
CO
..-
CO
10
N
«")
It)
CO
0)
0)
CO
~
10
10
CO
..-
0)
10
~
0)
«")
~
N
0)
N
CO
..-
N
C/
Q
.t::
U
-
III
~
-
III
U
o
-J
að
.'!!
c::
Q
E
Q
:>
o
g,
.§
ë¡¡
~
III
(J
CO
N
~
I'
N
.....
«")
....
ci...l
>-<
W....
>..0
-....
u...
M
....
en
N
<0
<0
N
It)
o
to
M
~
<0
N
o
<0
CO
~
N
to
N
I'
9Z
..:·to<
0...1
>-a..
"U;;"
..
o
<0
to
to
o
<0
N
>to::"
::,OZ
.' .};,<
..0"...1
>-a..
·.'·LL...,.
o
Q)
~
CO
CO
~
N
It)
OZ
..' ..r-<
0...1
>-a..
LL
en
....
"':.
....
It)
"':.
M
.:ï
«
....
o
....
OCOOO
N 0
o 0
I' 0
N 0
..- 0
«") 0
..-
en
oz
cÒ«
0...1
>-a..
LL
«") 0
..- 0
0) 0
N 0
CO 0
CO 0
N
CO
oz
,.:..«
0...1
>-a..
LL
10 0
o 0
CO 0
«") 0
~ 0
CO 0
N
o 0
CO 0
CO 0
'<t 0
N 0
CO 0
N
o 0
CO 0
CO 0
CO 0
o 0
CO 0
N
o 0
0) 0
0) 0
CO 0
CO 0
It) 0
N
It) CO CO
_ION
Ci:)1'''-
..- CO
"-01'
1'..-0
IO......N
(JJ
....
Z
:J
o
:E
<
cð
(JJ
W
u
a::
::J
o
CIJ
t!)
Z
ë
Z
:J
u..
-0
...
ns
~
o
U.
-0
Q
ëñ "¡:
Q ...
u ns
... U
:] Q
o u
~ .5~
.£ ... ~
ns.!!!~CD
:Ens(/-o
....ëc:c:
.!!!QE:]
...Ia::....u..
CO
N
o
I'
N
~.
M
....
M
....
~
N
<0
",.
N
It)
o
~
M
~
<0
N
o
<0
ca.
~
N
<0
N
o
<0
<0
<0
o
~
N
o
en
en
CO
CO
It)
N
en
....
I'
....
It)
I'
M
.:.¡
«
....
o
....
~
--
o
o
o
ê
.;:;.
-
ê
.;:;.
o
o
w
u
Z
<
...I
«
CD
..
CIJ
~
c::
«
:E
w
c::!
(.)
(.)
o
CD
>-
I-
Z
:)
o
'(.)
w
(.)
:)
-J
¡..:
rn
>-
cz::
<
:!
:!
:)
rn
z
<
-J
a.
cz::
<
w
>-
I()
"
,.," ." ~~ ...
en
I-
~Z
,:w
,to,,::!
......'.::E
);~
<0 .qo 0 0 0 N 0 0 CO 0 0
tr:..J 0) 0 0 a::.J <0 C") 0 0
L() C") -- ~ ~ 0) CO en
>-< C") CO .... >- < <0 .qo 0 ....
""..1- N .qo ...... W I- 0 CO CO ......
W'O <0 CO .qo 0 ~ N 'lit
>. .qo It) > L() It)
~,I- ü: I-
0
w -c-
0:: Õ
< lco ~ ...... 0 0 CO N 0 L() ~ CO
a. en" .qo C") ...... en CO <0 C") ...... I~
w o;z 0) ~ 0 ° Z 0 <0 C") °
0:: =< 0 ...... cz: . < N ...... CO cz:'
cz:
a. O'.J ...;- N <D 0 .J N ~ N <DI
W >-0.. ~ 0 .... >- a.. ~ ....
I- u;.". ~ .... LL ~ ....
<
Q
. CO 0) 0 0 ...... 0) ° 0) 0) ...... õ
= L() .... ...... cz: .qo ~ 0 ...... ~
O'Z ...... ...... .qo ° Z <0 C") L() 'lit
~< <0 ...... ~ ~,.:3 ~ ...... L() ~
O,.J C") 0) M N ~ 0) M
>-<Q.. ~ 0) ~ >-0.. 0 ....
u.... .... u... ~ ....
...-...... ~
CI) -
0 L() L() 0 0 0 .qo 0 0) ...... 0 0
- r-;.. ". (J CO ...... <D ......' N ...... L() <D
T'" <T;.,Z Q <0 <0 ~ ,coO'Z N 0) ~ M
0 ll¡r C") CO ('II cO< ~ <0 .qo ('II
0 C") <0 0 o:.J N ~ <0 0
0 ~ 0) ~ , >- a.. 0 ~
~ >-, 'c:t .... . . U;.. ~ ....
T'" :E
- ¡::
c CI) ,..
Z ILl 0) L() 0 0 ~ CO 0 <0 0 'lit 0
:) ~ ...... Q) <0:,. 0 ...;- .qo en
...... .qo .... ':..~::~ CO <0 ...... ....
L1. :1Ot'< 0) 0 0 0 <0 N 0
l- ·.O:';.J N .qo ...... N ~ C") ......
cz:: ~ ~ 0) q :>-0:.. 0 0
0 .... , u...:,," ~ ....
a-
C") CO ° 0 .... .. .. ° 0 0 ~ .... 0
0) 0) . Q) .' 10" 0 N ...... en
.qo N ...... °Z .qo C") 0 ......
¡,.'::5 N ...;- <D ':3 0 <0 0 <D
:'¢" CO ~ Q) c'¢"~ N ~ <0 Q)
'0'" 0) Q) '0" 0) Q)
>-' a.. >-,11.
U;; u;,,'
,co,., ",
0 ...... 0 <0 M 0 C") 0 0 M 0
. ....1- 0) ~ ...... cz: 0 C") 0 L() cz:
~:W 0 0 C") ~ 0 ...... 0 ...... ~
Me> 0 <0 0 <D 0 N <0 ...... <D
0,0 CO CO L() .... . N CO ~ 0) ....
>-. ::J CO <0 "'!. N N. <D
Lt.1n .... ~ ....
<I ,:j ,:j w
Q < r.n < U
.=: l- I- I- Z
<I (J 0 z 0 «
Q - 't:I .J
~ ~ I- ::J l-
." :E ... «
0 ~
> Q ~ CD
<I ~ ::!
Q (J « 0
Q: 0 LL
+ -.I oð 't:I
<I - aa r.n .. Q
Q c 18 w f/ ;:
CI1 Q VI U Q ...
>: It'¡ - co
c:: ,.. ~ (J
~ .ª "- ã¡ ... u
- ~ ,.. ::J ::I Q ,
~ .g .. 0 0
~ c ... (J !
(J) ~ Q en (J) c
W "tJ - g ILl ;). ... .= co
:J Q - 0 e>
(J) aa - .9- ëü
QJ c:: ... 9 z ...
::J c ,- ~ Q ~ .!!! Q .... In
g - - en (J)
e> 0 ~ - E 0 :E co en Q :::s::
~ ~ - .... c ... 't:I .
Z '- ~ .§ Q ~ Z ... c co Q) c a::
- Q ~ ::J en Q) .... ::I «
0 ~ :J ... c
Cl.. 0 U 'g LL a:: l- LL ':E
Z ~
::J ~ W
LL. 0 :E u a::
M
g
....
N
i::I
"
š
"
~
CJ)
0:::
W
Z
0
Ci)
CJ) 'lilt
:!: 0
:!: 0
0 t-N
0::: 0:::
0 o <
~ a..W
W>-
Z O:::...J
::> ><
0
0 0::: 0
u. o ~
0 .... u.
CJ)
C :t 0
0::: 0)
< ...J 0)
W ~
0 Z 0:::
CD Z <
0 W
~ CJ) >-
0::: ...J
Z W <
::> a. .0
0 CJ)
0 u::
W
ë3
::>
...J
~
CJ)
w --.., ",-III
C)
z '# '#< '#</.'# '#'# '#</.</. ~~ '#< '# '# '#'#<
< ~Z '#'# </.'# </. '# </. '#'# '#'# tf..~ '#'# ~~
:z: 0 00.... 0:: O....N 00 ~Z OM 0 0 0 ..., 010 00 0,.. ,.. 00 0"'-
U I .... .... IO....Z
~
..., 8 88 g~~ 010 0011) 00 gg 00 00 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 0 00 010 000
0 ON 10 ION 00 00 00 0 ~ ~ N 00 00 00 01 010 ON 0....0
0 an a)M ::~~ "':0 a)NÑ ..to MM <Do ..to 0 có o)M ..tN M~
~ .... ... a) <DN O~ CÓ.no
.... .... ao... .... M N 10 ....ao ....
M ...
0
0
N
M 0 00 000 010 0011) 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 .... ~~ 010 0100
0 0 0 00 1011) ON 10 ION 00 00 00 00 0 ~ C! N 0 00 00 0 CCI ~~ ~~~
0 .n 0 0"": ~g "':0) CÓ"':O ..to MM .nO ..tøó 0 t..= ~ M..t NM <D t..=
~ .... ... CON 0.... ...,...,0
.... .... .... ao.... .... N N .... ,.. ....
N ....
0
0
N
N 0 00 000 010 ~~~ g8 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 000 .... g~ 010 0100
0 0 00 01011) ON 00 00 00 ao 0 ~ N 0 OCO OOCCl .... ON OMO
0 an 00 "":Ncå "":ai có"":d ..to M..t .nO ..to có 0 ... t..= g MM C'liC'Í"": t..= .nN 0"": 0..t0
~ .... ....10,.. .... ao... .... M .... ....,.. ....
... ...
0
0
N
.... 0 00 000 010 0011) 00 00 gg ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 00 000 0 00 00 0100
0 00 0101t) ON 100,.. 00 00 en 0 ~ N 0 OCO 00'" <I) 00 oao 0<1)0
0 an "':0 "":""':0 a) 0) a)..tøó ..to ....:. MO N..r ..r 0 cD g MM C\iC"i"": cD Lri"": 0"": OMO
0 ....
N .......,,.. ,..en .... N ... ....,.. ....
Ó
0
0
N
0 8 00 000 g~ 0011) 00 00 gg ~~ 0 0 0 0 0 00 000 0 0 00 100 100
0 00 0101t) 11)0'" 00 00 ..., 0 ~ N 0 OCCl OOCCl <I) 0 00 NO aoo
0 .n <Do "":''''¡'v; "':0) a) 0)"; ..to o)..t .nM Nt..= ..r 0 cD 0) MM NMO <D .n ON MO C'Í"":
N ...
ø. .......,'" -..., ... N ... ..., ....... ....
en
en
...
en 0 00 000 011) g0lt) 00 g8 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 goo 0 0 00 100 00
't' 0 00 o II) It) ON ON 00 00 .... ... "! 0 ~ N 0 OCO OCCl 0 0 00 NO ...0
<I) .n <Do "':""wi ,..:,..: 0)0"; MO a)..t 00 Ñt..= .... 0 ... .n 0) ..rM N..tÑ cD .n 0"'; MO ..to
en .......,co 11)", .... N .... ..., ....... ....
en
...
ao 0 00 000 011) 001t) 00 gg 00 00 0 0 0 0 g 00 000 0 00 Oil) 000
't' 0 00 0101t) ON OON 00 00 .... .... "! 0 ~ N OCO 00'" 0 00 ON OCOO
... .n <Do "":cwiwi "':<D 0)a)0 M.n ..to 00 N~ ... 0 ... .n 0) ..tM NC'i"': cD .nO ,..:&Ó OMO
en .......,CO ...,... .... .... .... ..., ....,.. ....
en
...
... 0 00 ggg ~~ goo 00 gg 8g 00 0 0 0 0 8 00 000 0 00 010 000
't' 0 00 .~C'I! 00 .... ... .... 0 ~ N OCO 00'" 0 00 ON OCOO
CCI .n <Do "':"':cwi ,..co ao....N M.n ..r0 00 N..r Ñ 0 ... .n 0) ..tM NM"': cD .nO "":\ti 0.n0
en .......,'" 10... .... .... M ... ..., ....... ....
en
...
'" 0 00 goo 00 000 00 00 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 00 000 0 00 010 000
't' 0 00 10 It) ON OON 00 00 00 .... ... ... 0 ~ N 0 OCO 00'" 0 00 ON OCOO
It) .n "':0 "';cicwi "':<D "':a)a) M.n MO 00 N"; Ñ 0 ... .n <D ..tM NMa) cD .nO O.n 0.n0
en .......,'" 10... .... .... M ... ..., ....CO ....
en
...
It) 0 00 000 00 gg~ 00 00 00 00 - 0 0 0 0 0 00 000 0 00 00 000
't' 0 00 000 ON 00 00 00 00 "! 0 ~ 0 0 OM OOM 0 00 00 OCOO
~ .n <Do "':ON .n<D "":ri"": M.n .nO 00 N.n ... 0 .... .n cO ..tM NMCÓ cD ..to O.n 0.n0
.......,'" CO CD .... .... M ... ..., ....'" ....
en
...
..., 8g ggg ~~ 000 00 00 gg 00 0 0 0 ~ 00 ~~~ 0 00 00 000
't' C!C!C'I! 00 00 00 "! ~ 0 ~~ 0 00 00 OCOO
M .ncO No)Ñ 1010 COO'" M.n ..to 00 N~ ... ... .n CO ...,M NMao cD ..to O.n 0.n0
01 ....M'" CO'" .... .... .... ..., ....'" ....
01
...
M 00 88g 00 gg~ gg gg gg 00 0 0 8 00 000 0 00 00 00
't' 00 ON 00 G! 0 0'" OOM 0 00 00 COO
N .n<D Na)~ M..t f/:i"':'" M..t ..to 00 N"; ... .n cO ..tM N"':Ñ cD ..to O.n .nO
01 ......,'" CO'" ... .... M ... ..., ....... ....
01
...
N gg goo 00 g~~ g8 g8 gg gg 0 0 ~ ~~ 000 0 00 00 00
't' 00 ON en 0 ~~~ 0 00 00 "'0
... .n",: Ma)"; M.n a)g:g McO NO 00 Ñ"; ..; .n N ...,.., NaoOl cD .no oa) .no
01 ......,'" ... .... M ... . ....'" ....
en
...
00 000 00 000 gg 00 gg gg 0 0 0 ~~ 000 0 00 00 00
00 000 ON OON 00 M 0 ~ C!~~ 0 00 00 NO
... .n",: .na).n M.n OM~ Ma) NO 00 N.n ..r .n N ..., NaoOl cD cDo oa) <Do
't' ......,'" ....COCD .... ... M ... . ....'" ....
0
01
en
....
E
.. ::>
Q)
'" l- e '"
(I) CD Z CD ::>
.. w :š u w I~ z :E
l- e u- :E ~ :E ë 0 S
z I~ ~ >I~ 0 (I) '" ~
...: CD a. ë~ Qi c Q)
W 11::" '" (I) 0 w .Q E e
::æ .. W ::> ~ ë Q) 0 > en u '" Q)
Z 0 (l)aJ CD oJ ~~ C CD II:: ~ B I~ I~ w " E
ë g Q ~ w Q) .Q I~ II:: e e
II:: '" <a
> W" Q) > E o Q) tí :ë( ~§ <a U e
w - '" ~'5 0 > e ¡;! '" ta W Qj(l) W C .... W ...J
I~ Q) ~ II:: ">
> ~e C) - <II Q) .. 0 >- Õ ë w ~ (I) <a ë ~U; II:: e .š!]i
.so gt! ~~ ::> 0" c W wE :E c
o c ¡¡ 0 -'" ~g <a Q) ~ .. ::> II:: < < og .. '"
E'; ~Ig 2:- c 0.- a. E :J ~ ~E ~ ë ~u (I) c c ~" w
00 ,,~ _c .. Q).5 <a o c ..J <0 8 <a= z z ~ Q) CD ....
..Jïii ;cg Q I- E II) E - ~ :E Ig ~ E ä I- ~ ~ z (l)U c II),CI ~ <ûí uE c c E ·e
~~ e 11::- z- 0_ .c; oJ Q) ::>
~~ ~~ Q ~I~ '" -" :J~ E 0 :J :J gë Ë Q) ::> (l)0¡: Q) 5 U e ::> i!!
e <a .c; oð (ã
wE - <a C) Z <a <a.c; ~< :E.s ~ .¡: g~ 5·~u u :J :E Eo ea. w æOë c .. .!.!Ë 5J::2
c- ...J ..J- Q) I- °c-
~ð ::>" Š -e E ~ e- :EE c 8~ ~ð~ ã: !3 :E aJ C "C- cu > >- ~ð
:E 01 01 Õ E ~~ 01 cu W
o Q 0- ::> ::> CD~ 0" :Jð :Eõ <~ :EaD -01
u:E U.5 0 ~:E J:a. uo 0 is: wO 11::1-0 C) :J IfJ 0 w > u~
C) l- I- u< I- < () u a. I- a.
¡
"
.
f
!
;:
en
0::
w
Z
0
en
en 'It
:E 0
:E 0
0 l- N
0:: 0::
() 0 «
~ a.. w
w >
Z 0:: ..J
::J «
0 > ()
() 0:: en
u. 0 ü:
0 l-
e ~ 0
0:: ::I: 0)
« ..J 0)
W ~
0 Z 0::
aJ Z «
0 w
~ en >
0:: ..J
Z W «
::J a.. ()
0 en
() ü:
w
()
::J
..J
~
en
, ,
w '"", ~~
<:)
z t/. t/. t/. t/. t/.t/. t/. t/. t/. <t/. t/. t/. t/.t/. t/. ~ t/.t/. t/.t/. t/. t/. ..;
<
:z: 0 10 - 0 0., 10 0) 0 z~ 0 ., ON N ,...0 ,...CO 0 10
10 N
(,)
.,.
~ 0) 00 0 CON 0 0 ~OO 8~ 010 00 00 8g .., 0 t/.
,... MO) 0 CO'" cø 0 o 1ft 010 00 00 .., ., ,...
0 ,..; c:iui ui coicoi ,..; ,,; "":";cô coiui ~ui aic:i aicoi uic:i cå cå 0
N ai
.:, cø M N -... ... N N ., M ... -... ;1j
... N
0
0
N
.., 0) gg 0 CO'" 0 0 ~8~ 8~ 010 00 00 00 .., 10 t/.
0 ... 0 CO., 0 ., 010 00 00 oco .., 10 0)
0 ,..; cåcoi ui coi"'; coi coi "';0"'; coi"; ~.. NO ";coi ..;,,; cå cå 0
t1 cc N N -10 ... N N ., M ... _en 0 N
N ... - co ...
0
0
N
N ~ gg 8:8~ 0 0 ~oo 010 010 00 00 8g .., 1ft t/.
t'! ., o 1ft ON 010 00 00 .., CO N
0 ui "';coi uicoicå coi "';0"'; coicoi ....=tci coic:i ";coi N"; ,..; ,..; CO
0 ... ,..;
t1 <D N N...I/) ... N N MM ,... -CO ...
- ... ... ...
0
0
N
0 gg 001/) 0 0 888 00 010 88 88 01/) 0 III t/.
- 0 00.., co I/) 00 010 01/) 0 "': ~
0 c:i uicoi uiNcå ,..; N uioui Ncoi "":ui Nc:i ";coi ,..;,..: cØ
0 - ui
t1 cc N N-" 0 N N M M ,... ... N
0 ... ... ...
0
0
N
0 0 00 000 0 0 888 00 88 00 00 88 0 I/) t/.
0 0 CON 00... co I/) 00 00 00 0 - 0)
0 c:i uicoi uiN~ ,..; coi uic:iui Ncoi ~M aiN uicoi ocå ,,; cå ~
t1 <D N N-I/) 0 N N MN ,... 0 CO ,...
() ... ... 10
()
()
...
en 0 00 88~ 0 0 000 010 00 88 00 01/) 0 I/) t/.
G,' 0 CON co I/) OCCO ON 00 00 ON 0 ... N
0 ";coi ";N"': ,..; coi &ri"":cÓ Ncoi ,..;~ aiN q;jcoi o~ ,,; N N
co cc N N_" 0 N N NN ,... 0 ... 9
()
() - .... 10
...
co 0 00 ~~~ 0 0 800 010 88 88 00 01/) 0 I/) t/.
G,' C! CC!t'! co I/) <DO ON 00 ON 0 N ¡g
... ... .,M .,Nen ,..; ..; ""':"';CÖ NN ,...:,....: aiN aicoi 0"; ..; ..;
en cc N N-., cø N N _N ... I/) ... 0
() .... - 0
...
,... 0 100 ~oo 0 0 000 010 00 88 00 01/) 0 I/) t/.
G,' C! CC!t'! " C! "': .., 0 000 ON 00 00 ON 0 co 10
0 .... NM MNen cØ N q;j~"': NN ,...:,..: ~~ coic:i oc:i ..; coi M
en <DN N...., cø N N .... co 0 ... 9
() ... .... 10
....
0 ~ 100 ~~~ 0 0 888 010 00 010 00 00 I/) 0 t/.
G,' CC!t'! .., 10 ON 00 0... 00 00 ... N co
I/) .... NM IOCOcø cØ N "';~cå NN ....:,...: coiN uio c:icoi N cØ 10
en <DN N ., 0 N N ....M co 0 ... 9
en ... .... 0
....
I/) 0 100 10'00 0 0 000 8 10 88 88 88 01/) 0 I/) t/.
G,' C! C!t'! ~t'!"': co 0 000 t'! ON 0 ... 0)
., U; MM <DO)... cØ N ""':"":cö ..; ... ""=cò NN a:ic:i o;t N c:i 0
() N N ., 0 N N .... M CO co N
() ... .... 10
....
.., 0 100 001/) 0 0 8 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 88 0 I/) t/.
G,' C! C!t'! ~C'!~ ., 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N ...
.., ... MM 0)0... coi N ,..; ,..:cä ..; c:i 0 q;j N c:i :8c:i c:icå 0 cØ ....
en CON N....I/) 0 N N .... M I/) 10 coi
() - ... 10
...
.., 0 100 001/) 0 0 8 88 0 ~ ~~ ~~ 00 ~~ 0 I/) '#-
G,' C! "":C'! ~C'!"! ., 0 C! C!C! 0 ... ~
N ... MM ,...M'" c:i ,.; ,..; ";CÓ M .... occ M 0 :so 0,... c:i ,,;
en <D.... N .., 0 N N .... I/) ;1j ri-
() .... ...
...
N 0 100 001/) 0 0 0 00 8 ~ 8 0 0 8 88 00 8 I/) t/.
G,' C! "":C'! ~C'!CIC! co 10 0 00 0 0 00 .... CD
... It) 10M IOMO ui ,.; ,..; "':CÖ N Ñ c:i a:i a:i c:i uic:i 0"; 0 ø:i "":
en cc.... N ., 0 N .... M 0) ... () -
() ... ... 10
...
0 100 001/) :; 0 0 00 8 ~ 8 8 0 0 88 0 0 ()
C! ,...N ON.., 10 0 00 0 0 0 0 0
c¡; ;:: uicoi c:icoi"; cØ ,.; ,..; "";cå N .... c:i a:i ui c:i ~o c:i 0 ,..: "
.... N 0 N N .... ., en co
0 - - .... 10
en ,
() -
...
ë a:
w <
> w
c 0 >
a: :z:
0 .. a.
;; CD ~
.. ~ a.
a. oJ 1:: <
.. 0 I- :I
U ~ 0 en
a. a: a: .. III '" Z W
a: I- 0 .. CD :) CD"'" C 0 <:)
)("C Z a. ;( en u I- a:" .g z
0 ~ ~ u c (/) _ 0 F= <
~c "C C ca ~ ::::E s~ ca
E " u < c a: .g Ig "S 9 ~ ¡¡; :z:
CD 0 .. CD "C .. C U 0 (,)
c ",I!! 8~ 0 0 .. g ã E üi g -c CD CD_
.2 ca :I ~ I- Z 1:: ~ "C 0 ca en ¡ E:ã enO a. I-
iQ 28 .. " 5 < 0 .. CD C (J ~ ~ o¡ C ::I W'" oJ z
11 a. u "2 CD 0 eo. F=.!! < w
.. CD ca_ 1;:0. ~ 0 I- ~ E C õi CD "C "C Ë u
-t!:ö >- II~ en a: 1;:- III I"§ e "8 ~ ~ 0 ">- ~æ I- a:
ca CD ca 0 0 oS ~ C CD cS F=5 0
~a: (/)<:) III 0 < 0..0 :) W W u a: a: ¡¡; wo I- W
. I- ~ ::::E a. I- a. I- :) . a.
i
I
;¡
'-'"
..."
(CBC)
CITIZEN BUDGET COMMITTEE
SCHEDULE FOR MEETINGS
YEAR 2004
1/16/2004
2/20/2004
3/191 2004
4/161 2004
5/21/2004
6/181 2004
7/16/2004
8/20/2004
9/17/2004
10/15/2004
11/19/2004
12/17/2004
Note: Meetings times/dates/place: 7:30 A.M./Third Friday of month/@ Conf. Room # 3
'-'
""'"
St. Lucie County Sheriffs Office
5 Year Budget Plan
FY 03-04 FY04-05 FY 05-06 FY 06-07 FY 07-08
Budaet Proiection Prolection Proiection Proiection
Personnel Services $30,610,452 $35,063,766 $38,303,079 $40,633,021 $43,581,832
Operating Expenses $8,295,519 $9,430,090 $9,841,169 $10,700,998 $11,303,132
Capital Outlay $295.000 $359,650 $364.400 $369.375 $374,155
Subtotal $39,200,971 $44,853,506 $48,508,648 $51,703,394 $55,259,119
Contingency $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 $500,000
Total $39,500,971 $45,203,506 $48,908,648 $52,153,394 $55,759,119
Notes:
The figures above starting in Fy 04-05 includes costs to operate the first pod, not the second. The second pod will
cost approximately $2,017,000 annually,
'-/~ . &' U, v I. 0 .Ie..
Costs to Operate New Pods:
Personnel Services $0 $2,794.620 $3,129,974 $3,505,571 $3,926,240
Operating Expenses $0 $1,053,453 $1,106,126 $1,161,432 $1,219,504
Start-Up Costs $0 $119,164 $0 $0 $0
Capital Outlay iQ iQ iQ iQ iQ
Subtotal $0 $3,967,237 $4,236,100 $4,667,003 $5,145,744
Federal Inmate Reimb. $0 $1,395,000 $890,000 $0 $0
Net $0 $2,572,237 $3,346,100 $4,667,003 $5,145,744
Notes:
Federal Inmates reimbursement is based on 90 inmates at $85 per day,
Reimbursement assumes Federal Inmates move in April 2005,
By April 2006 based on current trends all inmates will be county inmates.
Source:
Sl Lucie County Sheriff's Office
/ /J 716
I( /6 It' '/ 17---- )
G:\Budget\Quattro\RESEARCH\Studies\5 Year Plan 2004\SHERIFF,xls
'-" '..."
St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Cost per Inmate
(BOCC portion only)
Fiscal Year 2003 Total
Expense
Expense per Averaae #
of Inmates (per day)
Jail Maintenancel Central Services
Capital Improvements - Rock Road
Jail
Total (BOCC Portion)
$1,118,899
$2.87
$1,491,039
$2,609,938
$3.82
$6.69
Average Daily Inmate Population
1,069
Notes: As discussed at the 1/16/04 Citizens' Budget Committee meeting, the Sheriffs
Department's cost per inmate per day is approximately $48.
2/18/2004
I I»
:Þ~
en CD
3 CD
I» 3
_CD
-::]
o :-
o
::]
o
CD
en
en
õ'
::]
5'
-
::r
Cir
I»
@
I»
::E
o
C
c::
..,
CD
I»
"0
::r:
C
(j)
m
0'"
CD
::]
CD
::!!
-
en
õ'
..,
-
::r
CD
o
~
"TI
"U
e
]>
3:
~ ~!" ~cg
5" I» -I (') -. "TI ;:0
Që6~g§~>
a. -< 0 ::] CD "U Z
~en~-<:9:::r-f
-o~::]::ral»n
..,ool»CDenO
::]CDenol»
I»coenl»o=Z
enooc:r::]ocn
~ ~ ::;;~ ~ ~ ëm
OCD"U Q.a.
CD _ e Õ -. N ;:0
eno 0o:Þ
~"':Þ3~o-f
ca.enCDen _
-CDCCDc"UO
l»(D'o'-"O°Z
~::]£2'~;+cn
CD a. CD .-'< g..
CDS·a.~oS
3 co 5' CD ::J. 0
CD - co ::E ~. (J)
~~I»I»!J>::r
r+ -. r+ r+ 0
o ~ en ~ @
gg,~§ en
::] ::r 5' a. §
CD::Ecoen ;:;:
co CD_CD en
Oen::r::E .-
=--CDCD 0
a en -.., 0'"
CD CD ::]::] CD
a.<a.CD
- _.::J. CD 0
_o0a. 0
::r CD -n en ::]
CD I» '" ::]
O"'0õ' CD
_. CD 1».., Q.
~!Ua.Z CD
§~§~ ~
a.-a. I» 0
_"TI"TI'" ::r:
::r "U CD CD 0_
CD eCD I»
o:þa.:", ã:
01»~5 ~
c::];;oc "U
~ ~ g <g. 5'
::Era.1» g¡
000'-
§: ¥ 3. æ ~
::r::]a.1» CD
1»::]°cD ..,
< 5' ëi!'" §
CD co _. 0 a.
-a.::] 0
00l»~ ::E
@ 0 .., I» ~
I»CCD::] .-
03tiia. CD
::r CD = "0 ::E
I»~OCD a
oenl»3- CD
oen-gl» ~
3 ::ro" ^'
"0 0 -. en ....
a::E~3 ~
3~~Q en
Cij"CDCDCD OJ
CD en < CD -.
o ~ _~ ~ 3
::] .., ~ CD 5'
I»CDc::] a
::] I» ::] a. 5'
::]en=CD co
CD -. '" a.
x ;:æ.en ~
I» ::r '< 0 CD
=-CD'::r ,....
g(J);!~ 'è{
DrrCD£ c
tÈ °O~ ~
c g¡ 0 en-
I» < §
~ õ'~
_.CD ::r
::] I» I»
~@en
CD I»
.-
::r
CD
o
o
c
::]
~
I»
::]
a.
"TI
"U
e
:!::
(J)
r
o
c
~
;:;:
'<
o
c
en
.-
o
3
CD
..,
en
õJz ~ ~O
.-CD < 0 CD "0
< C 1»"0
o I I ::] I I = 0
o "U-~S::-'<;+
CC~ÕI»-5CD§
~g@~S'1» 5-2:
o I»_DrQ.1» CD
"'",enï1::] ::]en
CDQíCD"Ua.CD'o....
~. ~ a. e ~ CD CD 0
g-~2:ÞDrI»a.3
::] CD en .., ::]::] 0
¡ten_CD'-a. <
..,en"oDr3'" CD
CDI»O=-O~ ::E
o ::] 00.., CD I»
CDa."O::]CD::] en
<' -. CD en CD c cD
CD en õ3 3' 0 CD ::E
~ ~ ð-"å § ~ ~
cD CD ::] < 3 CD ..,
.., en I» CD õ' 1»3 "0
1»1»::] I» Dr
::] =-a. -"0 ::]
a.en"O 1»'" -
enffi'a en~ 0
CD a. a. õ' ã: =I:
::E c -. CD (J)
~ Q. ~en 0
en <' "TI - S-
CD -. "U c ::r
< ~ ciS. I
'b :::;. c
£' (j; <0 ff
en r ::r
a 0 5'
< en
o CD 0
o ::] ::]
3 .- ';;;"
"0 C vo
!2. @ Dr
;:;: is.
<'
CD
"TII»"TI
"U::]"U
e::]e
:Þ~:Þ
::!I::;-o
::] CD 0
I» < =
::] CD CD
Q. ::] Q.
I» C en
=CD_
'<enCD
en =r ~
goo
::] 3 _
a.z3
õ'~ª
::I»g
g @ en
co I» 0
- -
CD a.
3 g,
I»
..,
en
5'
3'
"0
I»
Q.
CD'
CD
en
I»
::]
a.
"TI""" (J)
"U r
I e I I I ~
z~@:ÞO:Þ=
OI»¡¡)ª.2:~;::;::
3en=-CDCDI»Q)
o::!lOxQ.a.o
CD.., ..,3 ~ a õ' '< '"
-. ::] I» 0
enc~genco=l:
~g¡CDOI»@O
õ' ~ 3' .2: ¡: ~ ~
CDen-gCD"'.-O'"
I» CD .., ~ !!1. 0 ......
@ ~.~ š2-a Q-~
I»0CD....OO-·
_ CD a. en ;+"0 g
~~ 503en ~
I» CD - .2: 0 .- ;:;:
-I» =CDeno::r
a. "'0.-1».....
-. CD =- 0 ::] ,.
{g -< Q ,0"'::] (Q
C .- .... -. CD a
cD 0::E~x CÐ
en oCD=-a3
g @ g õ' CÐ
.- .ft::]::]
5' ::!I vo en _
c CD::E ./
CD a.;:;:
-. õ' ::r
0- .., I»
_co
-. CD ..,
.g: co m
Oa!.3
o 0 CD
§ g ~
~ ~.
en
-
CD
::]
o
'<
z 0 :E "TII»"TI Z (J)
:E g g¡ ~m~ ~ h
o I I ::] I I I .... I I I :Þ -=-:þ I I I CD I I ::E
o"u(J)~;;o;;o-~ï1ï1(J)<::] "TI<::]::!Iõ::E~O=
CC"OÕCDCD~~-o-oCD~O§"U~ ~o=en'~~;'
::]O"'~-o-o-a.""CC~_M=el»°oa.o .... ....
~=en~00CDCD:þ:þ~CDM"':ÞcD3 3CD::]OO
..,°0-ï11»1»~'" ,....£~~æ.O..,~~~CD<CDXOc@
CD~<~=-=-c~õ3" ::E '<o<~ vl~ I»
encCD vOOI»I»_O I» I» -c<!2.e!2.@aC::en
ã:~~C::]::]cD~g¡~@~ 0c::~æ:þCD-<5~CD
CDI»::]:Þ3::E-c_~I»CD en enoen::E ::]enO
~::] õ@ooc§::] ~go::E ~~ =::] CD ;:;:=3·en CD 0'"
ena.o-@_a.=CD_OI» g¡8::E<::r_I»I»~
"Oo-a a.en~~5£cD § ::];:;:~"TI'-@::]o
1»0::r5CD"'I»-_::]a..., ,<Z=-::rCD"UO ::]=-
,<::]CD::]~CD<'<O""en~ ::EQê(J)l»e~~~g
I» ff ~ en CD .g !!1. õ 5' ~ ~ co::] I» ~ CD r .., :Þ en- 0 I» en ::e
"0 CD .., .., ::] -. ^' 0, I -. - 0 CD _. 0 - - -.
.., - CD CD en CD.., .... 0'" .., _.::] I CD ft,..... 1»::] co CD 0 0 -
CDo....-3-<· O"'_CDCD'~"'-CD ..,....01» en-::r
.... ~ ::] .., - ~. a en ::] I» 0
g. ~. ~ ~. ~ ~ ; ª- ~ 8 ~ 3 Q ~ 'ë6 ê: g- ~ £: g ª So
3,~CDen;:;:3..,gl»£g¡::!I ~0~0'" ::E::r-<a~»
~~""::rI»"'I»-a. ::] <seno ::rl»oCDI»(Q
õ'~a.õ30=-æ.cD~::]~§ CD::r a I»::]C-=-~
..,~g¡~s-~ga.~~I»~ :::r: CD ~~a::]og;
::E::]C&OI»I»~CD",iS.1» ~c ëi! ~~~oen 3
a3~ OcDð-_~CD~; <_.ff en~CDa.c CÐ
CDCD;:;: C_::]::rI»CD - ::r ~<;+::]
.., ::] (6' l~::] CD - "0 @ 0 -. 5' 0'" -
I»-en ~Q -~C ::] CD~ CD(J),<
is. 8 ~ m Q 0"0 cg. ~ g O"'hOo
en::] I» en CD0::E ::r 0
CD=- aCD g¡£;:;: ::E Zen ~á§
::E ::] Q. CD a.::r CD < Dr - =,~
CDC ~ 1»0"'- I» <::] -<:~
..,g¡ I» O"'CD~ '" ena. ~
en =- CÞ::r1» CD CD
CD Õ 0 ..... =- ::] <
< a. ::] 2' ~ 0 CD õ'
õ' CD Ë ~ ::] a. CD
g¡g ëi!~
::]
CD
5'
en
-
I»
-
CD
."CJ)
Om
~~
"tJm
m3:
:;:om
OZ
m:::!
~ e
.,,-t
"tJ-
eC
»:c!
»»
zG)
0:;:0
CJ)m
:-4m
ï3:
em
Q~
mea
Om
g~
Zm
:c!~
ïT-
~
~
::p
*
~
'"
~
.
~
C>
V
ù
-
~
C)
-C
c
~\7C
~~~~f
3'r
Solid_Waste,xls
~
Solid Waste
Revenues
Garbage Franchise Fees
The Solid Waste Collection Agreements require a
4% franchise fee to cover the cost of administration,
Landfill Fees
These are fees paid from the disposal of waste
at the Landfill, the fees cover the cost of the operation.
Interest on Investments
This is interest earned on cash in the escrow accounts
which is required by FDEP.
Sale of Fixed Assets
Monies received from the auction sales.
Scrap Sales
This is revenue received by the sale of white goods
(appliances, metal products, fencing, etc,) that
are recovered from the waste stream.
Scrap Sales-Aluminum/Paper
This is revenue received by the sale of paper products
and cardboard recovered from the waste stream.
Gas - Operating
Revenue collected for the sale of methane gas on a
Contract that did not materialize.
Rent
Rent from BioMass Technology for the land they would
utilize when they built a facility on Landfill property,
They paid rent for a short term and then the Contractor
and the County mutually agreed to dissolve the Contract.
Sale of Fixed Assets
Monies received from the auction sales.
Rent
Rent paid to Solid Waste by Environmental Resources
for the use of the Solid Waste Administration Building
built with enterprise funds.
~
..."
Actual '03
$244,984
$8,077,881
$368,617
$5,900
$103,003
$62,257
$30,344
$4,749
$100,000
$19,473
2/18/2004
......
..,¡
Citizens' Budget Committee
Bill Casey, Chairman
April 16, 2004
Board of County Commissioners
2300 Virginia Avenue
Fort Pierce, FL., 34982
Dear Commissioners:
The St. Lucie County Citizens' Budget Committee endorsed today, April 16th, to
approve in concept, Phase I of the North County Utility Expansion Plan, at an
estimated cost of $7,600,000 together with the financing plan outlined by
county staff.
The Citizens' Budget Committee also approved in concept, the Midway Road
utility expansion program as once again outlined by county staff.
Should you have any questions, please contact me at 201-3473.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
LiJ
Bill Casey, Chair
Citizens' Budget Committee
c: Douglas M. Anderson, County Administrator
Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator
Dan McIntyre, County Attorney
Marie Gouin, Management and Budget Director
Mike Bowers, Interim Utilities Director
Citizens' Budget Committee
Public Safety Coordinating Council