The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 05-16-06 May 16, 2006 6:00 P.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA WELCOME ALL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED. ALL MEETINGS PROVIDED WITH WIRELESS INTERNET ACCESS FOR PUBLIC CONVENIENCE. PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES AND PAGERS PRIOR TO ENTERING THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS. PLEASE MUTE THE VOLUME ON ALL LAPTOPS AND PDA'S WHILE IN USE IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS. GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES - Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA - Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items, which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS - These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesday at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION - Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS - These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT - Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting of general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM - Please be respectful of others opinions. MEETINGS - All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 6:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Assistive Listening Device is available to anyone with a hearing disability. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at (772) 462-1777 or TOO (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us Doug Coward, Chairman Chris Craft, Vice Chairman Joseph E. Smith Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson District No.2 District No.5 District No.1 District No.3 District No.4 May 16, 2006 6:00 P.M. Invocation Pledge of Allegiance 1./;J MINUTES A~~(I.~6/ 0 Approve the minutes of the meeting held on May 9, 2006. 2. PROCLAMA TIONS/PRESENT A TIONS A.J Resolution No. 06-172 - Congratulating Fire Co-Owner Kurt Holden and the Fort Pierce Fire ,~,' ()(O~ e~, Minor League Football Team on Reaching the Tournament Finals for Two Consecutive Years; t\ pr ¡(/ () and Wishing them Continued Success in the Future - Consider staff recommendation to adopt '.J the attached Resolution No. 06-172 as drafted. Resolution No. 06-173 - Proclaiming Monday, May 15, 2006, as "Law Enforcement Memorial Day"; and Proclaiming the week of May 14, 2006, through May 20, 2006, as "Law Enforcement Week" in S1. Lucie County, Florida - Consider staff ,r.e9Qmmendation to adopt the attached Resolution No. 06-173 as drafted. f\(ceptc2() b(.1 Ch;e1- (jQÎÎ~L".Y,b&h- Staff requests approval of the Indian River Lagoon Envirothon, Inc. request to pay travel expenses and plane fare ($4800) for the John Carroll High School Envirothon Team to attend Canon North American Envirothon in Winnipeg, Canada - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Indian River Lagoon Envirothon, Inc. request to pay travel expenses and plane fare ($4800) for the John Carroll High School Envirothon Team to attend the Canon North American Envirothon in Winnipeg, Canada. B. ~f~\tfù C:J f\'0P(VVe ,\l~Ù 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT ., / l3.~ulleJ ~(cl::¿\Æ~(¡11(c(Cl.n) /00-' A(~\¿~ (hlte~s-~f(lOrklC¡'afr 5 /CS6r ~Il'. PUBLIC HEARINGS 5A. , GROWTH MANAGEMENT c.\;r¡)tlt5/1/z1)J1 aft tea/!) !ü CtJ/~7tu- Iv J(¡lî& â /j tí I (WP/1 ,~(!c\ Consider Draft Resolution No. 0{f-155 granting a Change in Zoning from the HIRD (Hutchinson Island ~\~~~ 1ì Residential District) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Tailers' Cove) Zoning ~ /C District, and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the project to be known as . Tailers' Cove - PUD for 14.39 acres of property located on the west side of South SR A-1-A, directly across from the Atlantis condominiums - Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution No. 06-155, subject to 5 limiting conditions. Regular Agenda May 16, 2006 Page Two 1·' " SB"1 COUNTY ATTORNEY C6(ììn1Wìl~ ÀÎet~ll\~ +0 bG Cý1'\~4Lh:.J ~I O( tò fl'40 jl'-J \iro.n'~ . fb O-(! '~I. Ordinance No. 06~013 - Amendin~ t.he S~. Luère ~ounty Land Developm~n.t Code by Amending ~ction '~~I ieLit'li(.. 0.01.14 to provide for an Administrative Variance Procedure for MInimum Yard Setback In any 1/ 1 ' Existing Mobile Home Park - No specific action is required by the Board at this time. This meeting is for the purpose of accepting public comments and testimony and providing any direction to amend or otherwise modify this draft ordinance. The Second public hearing is scheduled for June 6, 2006. SC. ~~ GROWTH MANAGEMENT ~'J()(tJf Consider Ordinance No. 06-026 adopting the request by Charles Sabin, Sabin Companies, Inc., for a H\ '/-" (\ small scale change in future land use designation for an 8.9 acre parcel located northwest of the 'J)J intersection of Edwards Road and 2Sth Street, from Commercial (COM) land use to RM (Residential ~ Medium) land use. (File Number: PA-OS-011) - Consider staff recommendation to pass Ordinance No. 06-026 thereby adopting the Amendment. GROWTH MANAGEMENT ¡1dðih0WAI Optl~llL-h Ì)Jru)(~IÆ7/)ldeu~t¡'(t.- Sid L b e,(.~eLÆ AóVn Consider Draft Resolution No. 06-0S7 grantingl{¡ change~n Zóning from the RS-4 (Residential, Single--\¿R ~ Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the project ~ I.i... to be known as Orchid Place - PUD. (File No.: PUD OS-021) - Consider staff recommendation to 1r¡J? approve Draft Resolution No. 06-0S7, granting a Change in Zoning from the RS-4 (Residential, Single- I Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Orchid Place) Zoning District and Preliminary Plan,n~dnUnit Development approval f~r the project to b~ kn. own as Orchid {' Place - PUD> (1~'\hl\¿r1i)1 nHi~)~\~ ft D(ÛVa l fi~e(~~ ~f\fn"¡fYe 1--0 VVletrF (z 1~4.vAú.fPvWU . SE. , TH MANAGEMENT AtJiL,W,.lllcu05Cúp; I~ . y~'>. JJ.,\. Consider Draft Resolution No. 06-0S8 granting a '(J;ondi ionaíUs Permit and Major Site Plan Approval t\ O(u , for the construction and operation of a household goods warehousing and storage-mini-warehousing in P\ r¡.D the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District - Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution No. 06-0S8. SO. ,.!¡) .r, ~ VI ul ..1\ I/o i Y 5F. \ GROWTH MANAGEMENT . {L~e(J C?nsider D~aft Resolution N~. 06-?5~ granting a Chang~ in Zoning fo~m th.e RS-2 (Resident!al, ~ ~~/ (::) Single-Family - 2 du/ac) ZOning DIstrict to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Resldentlal- 1 du/ac) Zoning ~/ District. (File No.: RZ-06-004) - Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution No. 06-059, granting a Change in Zoning from the RS -2 Zoning District to the AR-1 Zoning District. GROWTH MANAGEMENT Consider Draft Resolution No. 06-060 granting a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/ac) Zoning District. (File No.: RZ-06-006) - Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution No. 06-060, granting a Change in Zoning from RS -2 Zoning District to the AR-1 Zoning District. / ~ \ 5H. . GROWTH MANAGEME T fl\ú Lu, ~ù l.\¡IJ(èYt'- AÇ- YUì\d'x D,~t, ,'J ) r, ~ Consider Draft Resolution N . 6-154 granting a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single- t\,'J'J(L\;[1 Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the A~-1 (Agricultural -1 du/ac) Zoning District for propert~ located 1\\ \ _ on the west side of Bennett Road, approximately 1.9S0 feet south of Peterson Road - ConsIder staff K,' / lJ recommendation to Deny ~raft R~s~lution No. 06-1S4, for a Chan~e in Zoning from .the R~-2. Zoni~g ")' District to th~ AG-1 Z~nlng District. St~ff r~c~mmends dental of AG-1 Zonln9 I District Wlt~J ' recommendation of rezoning to the AR-1 Zoning District. CruJ'1- - Y t ) Lë w ì y 'fC5> H/dz /J'JVì Sr-:H'\ yeS (wctvd ~~ó ---'Ie) 5G,: \, '1 G f"\í(,~L ~Ut / 't.! I \ ryL ; Regular Agenda May 16, 2006 Page Three , 51. Jt~ GROWTH MANAGEMENT ~\ÙV(~ . Consider Draft Resolution No. 06-056 granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation t \YJ) of a Motor Vehicle Repair Service including Body Repair in the CG (Commercial, General) ') Zoning District for property located at 6900 Heritage Drive - Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution No. 06-056. 5J. /()COUNTY ATTORNEY ,. ~~J Petition for Abandonment - Abandon a portion of an unopened 50 foot right-of-way known as Boyington \\\)~{lJ~ Road - Resolution 06-123 - Consider staff recommendation to approve Resolution No. 06-123, instruct t\ staff to publish the final Notice of Abandonment, record Resolution No. 06-123. Proof of Publication of the Notice of Intent to Abandon, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Public Hearing, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Abandonment in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. 5K. \ COUNTY ATTORNEY ~t IPrdinance No. 06-016 - Establishing the Waterstone Community Development District - Consider staff ~~ ~ \)1)' .lLf-ecommendation to approve Ordinance No. 06-016 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Ordinance. 5L. \ COUNTY ATTORNEY ~f''\\ie:\Ordinance No. 06-014 - Establishing the Celebration Pointe Community Development District - f\~~~ fJ Consider staff recommendation to approve Ordinance No. 06-014 and authorize the Chairman to sign o the Ordi~ance. \ Co ¡ \ : I.' '-\'\ '.. ¡ _.:' '\, ( ¡- _"¡ _~ ~ Ii" J( l:t Gv V' "V\ END OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CONSENT AGENDA 1. WARRANTS LIST Approval of Warrant List No. 32 2. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Resolution No. 06-150 - Extending State of Local Emergency - Ban on Open Air Burning in St. Lucie County - Consider staff recommendation to approve Resolution No. 06-150 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Resolution. B. Library - 101 Melody Lane - Temporary Construction Easement - Consider staff recommendation to grant a Temporary Construction Easement in favor of Boca Ven Land of Fort Pierce, Inc., authorize the Chairman to execute the Temporary Construction Easement and direct staff to record the Temporary Construction Easement in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 3. PUBLIC WORKS A. Road and Bridge Division - Approve Equipment Request (EQ06-271) to purchase a new 12'x14' Storage Building from The Shed Man for $3500.00 - Consider staff recommendation to approve Equipment Request (EQ06-271) to purchase a new 12'x14' Storage Building from The Shed Man for $3500.00. B. Engineering Division - Entrada Avenue and Rio Mar Drive Landscape Project - Award contract to low bidder, Sunshine Land Design, in the amount of $401,529.60 Bid No. 06-029 - Consider staff recommendation to approve awarding Entrada Avenue and Rio Mar Drive Landscape Project to low bidder, Sunshine Land Design in the amount of $401,529.60, establish project budget, and authorize the Chairman to sign. C. Road and Bridge Division - Approve Equipment Request (EQ06-270) to purchase a new 2006 10' Rotary Mower Head for $5,435.00 - Consider staff recommendation to approve Equipment Request (EQ06-270) to purchase a new 2006 10' Rotary Mower Head for $5,435.00. D. Engineering Division - Award of RFP No. 06-026 - Professional Engineering Services for Construction Management - Consider staff recommendation to approve the shortlist and grant permission to negotiate with the top four ranked firms: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., LBFH, Inc., PBS&J, and Stanley Consultants, Inc., and authorize the Chairman to sign contract as prepared by the County Attorney. E. Engineering Division - Lennard Road 1 MSBU - Approval of Amendment No. 5 to Work Authorization NO.8 to the Agreement for Engineering Services with Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to approve Amendment NO.5 to Work Authorization NO.8 to the Agreement for Engineering Services with Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. to extend the allotted time to complete all tasks to, no later than, four months after the completion of construction. 4. PARKS AND RECREATION A. Fairgrounds water Plant Capacity Expansion/Approval to Bid Request - Consider staff recommendation to approve the request to go out for bids for the Fairgrounds Water Plant Expansion Project and approve the use of $217,000.00 form Park "B" Impact Fees for additional funding of the project. B. Request for Fee Waiver - Staff requests direction concerning waiver of the fees for Project HOPE to use Lincoln Park Community Center for an event on June 3, 2006. 5. CULTURAL AFFAIRS Purchase of Sculpture for display at Heathcote Botanical Gardens as part of the Art in Public Places Program's permanent inventory - Consider staff recommendation to approve the purchase of the sculpture "A Sapling's Canopy" for the Art in Public Places Program's art inventory for an amount not to exceed $9,500.00. Consent Agenda May 16, 2006 Page Two 6. CENTRAL SERVICES A. Request to transfer equipment, an enclosed utility trailer, to Central Services Department, St. Lucie County property #303406 / Tag # 103611 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the request to transfer equipment, an enclosed utility trailer, to Central Services Department, St. Lucie County property #303406 / Tag # 103611. B. Temporary relocation of Inmates from Building B-4 to a vacant and alternate area located in Building D-2 enabling contractor, Sunrise System of Brevard, to do exterior work on Building B- 4, and allow staff to perform necessary maintenance on interior of building while unoccupied, and approve reallocation of funds in the amount of $71,600.00 from General Fund Contingency / Budget Amendment No. BA06-137for projected Sheriff's staffing cost, not exceed sixty-four (64) calendar days - Consider staff recommendation to approve temporary relocation of inmates from Building B-4 to Building 0-2 enabling the contractor, Sunrise Systems of Brevard, to do exterior work on Building B-4, and allow staff to perform necessary maintenance on the interior of the building while it is unoccupied, and approve reallocation of funds in the amount of $71,600.00 from General Fund Contingency / Budget Amendment No. BA06-137 for projected Sheriff's staffing cost, not to exceed sixty-four (64) calendar days. 7. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE Central Services - Reallocate remaining IFF Funds in the amount of $243,000.00 from funds budgeted FY 05-06 to replace the roof on the Administration Annex. The roof replacement project was completed under budget - Consider staff recommendation to approve the reallocation of IFF Funds in the amount of $243,000.00 from funds budgeted FY 05-06 to replace the roof on the Administration Annex and was completed under budget. These funds will be used on the following project locations: $20,000- Administration Annex/new flooring, $10,OOO-South County Annex/purchase gazebo, $92,000- Central Services/construction of new building, $16,OOO-Rock Road Jail/sally port doors, $20,OOO.00-Rock Road Jail/Electrical Engineering Services, $65,000-Rock Road Jail Maintenance Division, and $20,000- Hayslip Data Treatment Center/renovation of restrooms. 8. HUMAN RESOURCES Reimbursement rates for meals and mileage - Consider staff recommendation to approve Resolution No. 06-175 with an effective date of May 16, 2006. 9. COMMUNITY SERVICES A. Authorize staff to submit a grant application to the Florida Department of Transportation Transit Corridor grant program to implement transit service connecting St. Lucie County and Indian River County - Consider staff recommendation to authorize staff to submit a grant application to the Florida Department of Transportation Transit Corridor grant program to implement transit service connecting St. Lucie County and Indian River County. B. Request for Board approval to apply for the third year of funding from the FOOT Service Development grant for the East-West Transit Routes - Consider staff recommendation to authorize staff to submit a grant application to FDOT Service Development program for operation of the two existing east west routes. C. Approve the first amendment to the artist's contract as prepared by the County Attorney for the transit art bench project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the first amendment to the artist's contract for the development of the mosaic art benches. 10. PARKS REFERENDUM Work Authorization to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to approve work authorization to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc in the amount of $1,315.00 to stake twelve light poles and complete the final grading elevation. ANNOUNCEMENTS MAY 16, 2006 1. On Wednesday, May 17, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. the Board of County Commissioners will hold a Special Meeting in the County Commission Chambers on continued Agenda Item No. 7 from the May 9, 2006 Board of County Commissioners meeting regarding the St. Lucie County Fairgrounds Master Plan. 2. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Public Hearing on the Brownfield Designation on Tuesday, May 22, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. at the St. Lucie County International Airport Administration Building located at 3000 Curtis King Boulevard, Fort Pierce, Florida. 3. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Recreation and Parks will conduct a public workshop for Fort Pierce Inlet State Park on Wednesday, May 24, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. The purpose of this workshop is to present the draft land management plan for this park to the public. A DEP Advisory Group meeting is scheduled for Thursday, May 25, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the proposed land management plan for this park with the Advisory Group members. 4. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Space Needs Study Workshop on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. in the County Commission Chambers. 5. St. Lucie County will hold the second Public Visioning Meeting to discuss the PSL Yacht Club Replacement Facility on Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 6:00 PM. at the Oxbow Eco Center located at 5400 NE St. James Drive, pt. St. Lucie, FL 34983. 6. The Board of County Commissioners will hold the Civic Center Demolition Ceremony on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 at 3:00 p.m. in the Civic Center parking lot. 7. On Tuesday, May 30, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. in the County Commission Chambers the Board of County Commissioners will hold 2nd Public Hearing to include: _2nd Reading of LDC Revisions _2nd Reading of TDR Ordinance 8. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Hurricane Preparedness Workshop on Friday, June 9, 2006 from 9:00 a.m. to Noon in the County Commission Chambers. 9. The Special Olympics, 81. Lucie County Golf Tournament will be on Saturday, June 10, 2006 at Club Med at 8:30 a.m. (Shotgun Start). 10. The Board of County Commissioners will hold an Infrastructure Workshop on Monday, June 19, 2006 from 9:00 a.m. to Noon in the County Commission Chambers. 11. The Port St. Lucie City Council will host a Joint Meeting with the Board of County Commissioners and the City of Fort Pierce Commission on Thursday, July 13, 2006 from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the Port St. Lucie Community Center. 12. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a TVC Infrastructure Workshop on Monday, July 17, 2006 from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. in the County Commission Chambers. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings. individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (772) 462-1777 or TOO (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. May 16, 2006 6:00 P.M. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AGENDA WELCOME ALL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED. ALL MEETINGS PROVIDED WITH WIRELESS INTERNET ACCESS FOR PUBLIC CONVENIENCE. PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES AND PAGERS PRIOR TO ENTERING THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS. PLEASE MUTE THE VOLUME ON ALL LAPTOPS AND PDA'S WHILE IN USE IN THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS. GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES - Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA - Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items, which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS - These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesday at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION - Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS - These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT - Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting of general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM - Please be respectful of others opinions. MEETINGS - All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 6:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Assistive Listening Device is available to anyone with a hearing disability. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at (772) 462-1777 or TOO (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. - . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us Doug Coward, Chairman Chris Craft, Vice Chairman Joseph E. Smith Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson District No.2 District No.5 District No.1 District No.3 District No.4 May 16, 2006 6:00 P.M. Invocation Pledge of Allegiance 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held on May 9, 2006. 2. P OCLAMA TIONS/PRESENT A TIONS Resolution No. 06-172 - Congratulating Fire Co-Owner Kurt Holden and the Fort Pierce Fire Minor League Football Team on Reaching the Tournament Finals for Two Consecutive Years; and Wishing them Continued Success in the Future - Consider staff recommendation to adopt ./ the attached Resolution No. 06-172 as drafted. V· Resolution No. 06-173 - Proclaiming Monday, May 15, 2006, as "Law Enforcement Memorial Day"; and Proclaiming the week of May 14, 2006, through May 20, 2006, as "Law Enforcement ~ Week" in St. Lucie County, Florida - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the attached Resolution No. 06-173 as drafted. . Staff requests approval of the Indian River Lagoon Envirothon, Inc. request to pay travel expenses and plane fare ($4800) for the John Carroll High School Envirothon Team to attend Canon North American Envirothon in Winnipeg, Canada - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Indian River Lagoon Envirothon, Inc. request to pay travel expenses and plane fare ($4800) for the John Carroll High School Envirothon Team to attend the Canon North American Envirothon in Winnipeg, Canada. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA ~/ GROWTH MANAGEMENT Consider Draft Resolution No. 06-155 granting a Change in Zoning from the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Tailers' Cove) Zoning District, and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the project to be known as Tailers' Cove - PUD for 14.39 acres of property located on the west side of South SR A-1-A, directly across from the Atlantis condominiums - Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution No. 06-155, subject to 5 limiting conditions. PUBLIC HEARINGS Cr-r ro ~7 " Regular Agenda May 16, 2006 pa.rwo ~. ÇOUNTY ATIORNEY Ordinance No. 06-013 - Amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by Amending Section 10.01.14 to provide for an Administrative Variance Procedure for Minimum Yard Setback in any Existing Mobile Home Park - No specific action is required by the Board at this time. This meeting is for the purpose of accepting public comments and testimony and providing any direction to amend or otherwise modify this draft ordinance. The Second public hearing is scheduled for June 6, 2006. ~ GROWTH MANAGEMENT Consider Ordinance No. 06-026 adopting the request by Charles Sabin, Sabin Companies, Inc., for a small scale change in future land use designation for an 8.9 acre parcel located northwest of the intersection of Edwards Road and 25th Street, from Commercial (COM) land use to RM (Residential Medium) land use. (File Number: PA-05-011) - Consider staff recommendation to pass Ordinance Np. 06-026 thereby adopting the Amendment. JI _)~&. ~~ ~ROWTH MANAGEMENT c., ,#',,1 ¿- Consider Draft Resolution No. 06-057 granting a Change in Zoning from the -4 (Residential, Single- Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unit Developme t approval for the project to be known as Orchid Place - PUD. (File No.: PUD 05-021) - Consid staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution No. 06-057, granting a Change in Zoning from t RS-4 (Residential, Single- Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Develop ent - Orchid Place) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval JP! the p ject to be known as Orchid Place - PUD> /- c.J C I'~] '" ~J'7 '-'- :n:> 4 /~ c...é:. .J 6-7 b r"'-"-~ , ~ r~~!J-/) "o/~~¡..NI'-~ ~ GROWTH MANAGEMENT . Consider Draft Resolution No. 06-058 granting a Conditional Use Permit and Major Site Plan Approval for the construction and operation of a household goods warehousing and storage-mini-warehousing in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District - Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft ~esolution No. 06-058. /J /J #~'l ~ ¿)-;--J bPS,ç;$. &-6L . GROWTH MANAGEMENT . Consider Draft Resolution No. 06-059 granting a Change in Zoning form the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/ac) Zoning Distr'ict. (File No.: RZ-06-004) - Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution No. 06-059, granting a Change in Zoning from the RS -2 Zoning District to the AR-1 Zoning /istrict. '\)Ù. QROWTH MANAGEMENT Consider Draft Resolution No. 06-060 granting a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/ac) Zoning District. (File No.: RZ-06-006) - Consider staff recommendation to approve Draft Resolution No. 06-060, granting a Change in Zoning from RS -2 Zoning District to the AR-1 Zoning District. ~ GROWTH MANAGEMENT Consider Draft Resolution No. 06-154 granting a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single- Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AG-1 (Agricultural -1 du/ac) Zoning District for property located on the west side of Bennett Road, approximately 1.950 feet south of Peterson Road - Consider staff recommendation to Deny Draft Resolution No. 06-154, for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 Zoning District to the AG-1 Zoning District. Staff recommends denial of AG-1 Zoning District with recommend~11 ;;;:3 10 /:)~-/ning ~iSlrict. · Regular Agenda May 16, 2006 Page Three ~rðiA/~~ /J~. ~ v--I¥2ulfff ./ 1"'( ~ úJ {//<, GROWTH MANAGEMENT / Consider Draft Resolution No. 06-056 granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a Motor Vehicle Repair Service including Body Repair in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for property located at 6900 Heritage Drive - Consider staff re'commendation to approve Draft Resolution No. 06-056. &:;J. ~OUNTY ATTORNEY V ~etition for Abandonment - Abandon a portion of an unopened 50 foot right-of-way known as Boyington Road - Resolution 06-123 - Consider staff recommendation to approve Resolution No. 06-123, instruct staff to publish the final Notice of Abandonment, record Resolution No. 06-123. Proof of Publication of the Notice of Intent to Abandon, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Public Hearing, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Abandonment in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. 51. ¿ COUNTY ATTORNEY Ordinance No. 06-016 - Establishing the Waterstone Community Development District - Consider staff recommendation to approve Ordinance No. 06-016 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Ordinance. vf COUNTY ATTORNEY Ordinance No. 06-014 - Establishing the Celebration Pointe Community Development District - Consider staff recommendation to approve Ordinance No. 06-014 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Ordinance. END OF PUBLIC HEARINGS CONSENT AGENDA 1. WARRANTS LIST Approval of Warrant List No. 32 2. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Resolution No. 06-150 - Extending State of Local Emergency - Ban on Open Air Burning in St. Lucie County - Consider staff recommendation to approve Resolution No. 06-150 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Resolution. S. Library - 101 Melody Lane - Temporary Construction Easement - Consider staff recommendation to grant a Temporary Construction Easement in favor of Boca Ven Land of Fort Pierce, Inc., authorize the Chairman to execute the Temporary Construction Easement and direct staff to record the Temporary Construction Easement in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 3. PUBLIC WORKS A. Road and Bridge Division - Approve Equipment Request (EQ06-271) to purchase a new 12'x14' Storage Building from The Shed Man for $3500.00 - Consider staff recommendation to approve Equipment Request (EQ06-271) to purchase a new 12'x14' Storage Building from The Shed Man for $3500.00. B. Engineering Division - Entrada Avenue and Rio Mar Drive Landscape Project - Award contract to low bidder, Sunshine Land Design, in the amount of $401,529.60 Bid No. 06-029 - Consider staff recommendation to approve awarding Entrada Avenue and Rio Mar Drive Landscape Project to low bidder, Sunshine Land Design in the amount of $401,529.60, establish project budget, and authorize the Chairman to sign. C. Road and Bridge Division - Approve Equipment Request (EQ06-270) to purchase a new 2006 10' Rotary Mower Head for $5,435.00 - Consider staff recommendation to approve Equipment Request (EQ06-270) to purchase a new 2006 10' Rotary Mower Head for $5,435.00. D. Engineering Division - Award of RFP No. 06-026 - Professional Engineering Services for Construction Management - Consider staff recommendation to approve the shortlist and grant permission to negotiate with the top four ranked firms: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc., LBFH, Inc., PBS&J, and Stanley Consultants, Inc., and authorize the Chairman to sign contract as prepared by the County Attorney. E. Engineering Division - Lennard Road 1 MSBU - Approval of Amendment No. 5 to Work Authorization NO.8 to the Agreement for Engineering Services with Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to approve Amendment NO.5 to Work Authorization No.8 to the Agreement for Engineering Services with Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. to extend the allotted time to complete all tasks to, no later than, four months after the completion of construction. 4. PARKS AND RECREATION A. Fairgrounds water Plant Capacity Expansion/Approval to Bid Request - Consider staff recommendation to approve the request to go out for bids for the Fairgrounds Water Plant Expansion Project and approve the use of $217,000.00 form Park liB" Impact Fees for additional funding of the project. B. Request for Fee Waiver - Staff requests direction concerning waiver of the fees for Project HOPE to use Lincoln Park Community Center for an event on June 3, 2006. 5. CULTURAL AFFAIRS Purchase of Sculpture for display at Heathcote Botanical Gardens as part of the Art in Public Places Program's permanent inventory - Consider staff recommendation to approve the purchase of the sculpture "A Sapling's Canopy" for the Art in Public Places Program's art inventory for an amount not to exceed $9,500.00. Consent Agenda May 16, 2006 Page Two 6. CENTRAL SERVICES A. Request to transfer equipment, an enclosed utility trailer, to Central Services Department, St. Lucie County property #303406 / Tag # 103611 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the request to transfer equipment, an enclosed utility trailer, to Central Services Department, St. Lucie County property #303406 / Tag # 103611. B. Temporary relocation of Inmates from Building B-4 to a vacant and alternate area located in Building D-2 enabling contractor, Sunrise System of Brevard, to do exterior work on Building B- 4, and allow staff to perform necessary maintenance on interior of building while unoccupied, and approve reallocation of funds in the amount of $71,600.00 from General Fund Contingency / Budget Amendment No. BA06-137for projected Sheriff's staffing cost, not exceed sixty-four (64) calendar days - Consider staff recommendation to approve temporary relocation of inmates from Building B-4 to Building D-2 enabling the contractor, Sunrise Systems of Brevard, to do exterior work on Building B-4, and allow staff to perform necessary maintenance on the interior of the building while it is unoccupied, and approve reallocation of funds in the amount of $71,600.00 from General Fund Contingency / Budget Amendment No. BA06-137 for projected Sheriff's staffing cost, not to exceed sixty-four (64) calendar days. 7. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE Central Services - Reallocate remaining IFF Funds in the amount of $243,000.00 from funds budgeted FY 05-06 to replace the roof on the Administration Annex. The roof replacement project was completed under budget - Consider staff recommendation to approve the reallocation of IFF Funds in the amount of $243,000.00 from funds budgeted FY 05-06 to replace the roof on the Administration Annex and was completed under budget. These funds will be used on the following project locations: $20,000- Administration Annex/new flooring, $10,OOO-South County Annex/purchase gazebo, $92,000- Central Services/construction of new building, $16,000-Rock Road Jail/sally port doors, $20,000.00-Rock Road Jail/Electrical Engineering Services, $65,OOO-Rock Road JaiJ Maintenance Division, and $20,000- Hayslip Data Treatment Center/renovation of restrooms. 8. HUMAN RESOURCES Reimbursement rates for meals and mileage - Consider staff recommendation to approve Resolution No. 06-175 with an effective date of May 16, 2006. 9. COMMUNITY SERVICES A. Authorize staff to submit a grant application to the Florida Department of Transportation Transit Corridor grant program to implement transit service connecting St. Lucie County and Indian River County - Consider staff recommendation to authorize staff to submit a grant application to the Florida Department of Transportation Transit Corridor grant program to implement transit service connecting St. Lucie County and Indian River County. . B. Request for Board approval to apply for the third year of funding from the FDOT Service Development grant for the East-West Transit Routes - Consider staff recommendation to authorize staff to submit a grant application to FDOT Service Development program for operation of the two existing east west routes. C. Approve the first amendment to the artist's contract as prepared by the County Attorney for the transit art bench project - Consider staff recommendation to approve the first amendment to the artist's contract for the development of the mosaic art benches. --.----....---------- 10. PARKS REFERENDUM Work Authorization to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to approve work authorization to Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc in the amount of $1,315.00 to stake twelve light poles and complete the final grading elevation. ANNOUNCEMENTS MAY 16,2006 1. On Wednesday, May 17, 2006 at 10:00 a.m. the Board of County Commissioners will hold a Special Meeting in the County Commission Chambers on continued Agenda Item No. 7 from the May 9, 2006 Board of County Commissioners meeting regarding the St. Lucie County Fairgrounds Master Plan. 2. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Public Hearing on the Brownfield Designation on Tuesday, May 22, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. at the St. Lucie County International Airport Administration Building located at 3000 Curtis King Boulevard, Fort Pierce, Florida. 3. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Recreation and Parks will conduct a public workshop for Fort Pierce Inlet State Park on Wednesday, May 24, 2006, at 7:00 p.m. The purpose of this workshop is to present the draft land management plan for this park to the public. A DEP Advisory Group meeting is scheduled for Thursday, May 25, 2006, at 9:00 a.m. The purpose of the meeting is to discuss the proposed land management plan for this park with the Advisory Group members. 4. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Space Needs Study Workshop on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 from 2:00 p.m. to 4:00 p.m. in the County Commission Chambers. 5. St. Lucie County will hold the second Public Visioning Meeting to discuss the PSL Yacht Club Replacement Facility on Thursday, May 25, 2006 at 6:00 PM. at the Oxbow Eco Center located at 5400 NE St. James Drive, pt. St. Lucie, FL 34983. 6. The Board of County Commissioners will hold the Civic Center Demolition Ceremony on Tuesday, May 30, 2006 at 3:00 p.m. in the Civic Center parking lot. 7. On Tuesday, May 30, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. in the County Commission Chambers the Board of County Commissioners will hold 2nd Public Hearing to include: _2nd Reading of LDC Revisions _2nd Reading of TDR Ordinance 8. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Hurricane Preparedness Workshop on Friday, June 9, 2006 from 9:00 a.m. to Noon in the County Commission Chambers. 9. The Special Olympics, 81. Lucie County Golf Tournament will be on Saturday, June 10, 2006 at Club Med at 8:30 a.m. (Shotgun Start). 10. The Board of County Commissioners will hold an Infrastructure Workshop on Monday, June 19, 2006 from 9:00 a.m. to Noon in the County Commission Chambers. 11. The Port St. Lucie City Council will host a Joint Meeting with the Board of County Commissioners and the City of Fort Pierce Commission on Thursday, July 13, 2006 from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. at the Port St. Lucie Community Center. 12. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a TVC Infrastructure Workshop on Monday, July 17, 2006 from 2:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m. in the County Commission Chambers. NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (772) 462-1777 or TOO (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. ---_.~ -- ~----,.__._- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: May 9, 2006 Convened: 9:00 a.m. Adjourned: 10: 46 a.m. Commissioners Present: Doug Coward, Chainnan, Chris Craft, Paula A. Lewis, Frannie Hutchinson, Joseph Smith Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Ray Wamy, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Don West, Public Works Director, Jim David, Mosquito Control Director, Ed Parker, Purchasing Director, Vanessa Bassey, Environmental Resources Director, Ed Fry Clerk of Courts, Ken Mascara, SherifI, Millie Delgado-Feliciano, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Smith, to approve the minutes of the meeting held May 2, 2006, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMATIONSIPRESENTATIONS A. A presentation was made by the Director of the Wings and Wheels Air, Military and Vehic1e Show. B. The County Administrator read upcoming events. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS Sheriff Mascara addressed the Board regarding Correctional Officers Week, May 8-13, 2006 and introduced Deputy Jason Wheeler who read a poem about Corrections Officers. Ms. Julie Garafalo, Realtors Association, addressed the Board and asked they vote no on the TVC. She expressed her concerns with property rights, water hook ups, affordable housing, flow way systems. These issues have not been addressed. Mr. Sean Mitchell, Port St. Lucie resident, Ironworkers 402, addressed the Board regarding item number 7 and the moving of the historical house. He stated his opposition to the County utilizing any taxpayer funds to move or remodel the house. Representative from the Surf Riders Association addressed the Board and expressed their concerns with the Showl and the removal of the sand. Mr. Bob Bangert, Conservation Alliance, addressed the Board in opposition to the Showl and the sand removal. He also commented on the canals through Holiday Pines and advised the Board'the canals have not been maintained. 4. CONSENT AGENDA It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve the Consent Agenda to include the additions CA-I-3, and; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List No. 31. 2. COUNTY ATTORNEY 1 -..-------....---, -------- '_.._~--.._------.._- A. South County Regional Sports Stadium- The Board approved authorizing filing an application to rezone South County Regional Sports Stadium to an appropriate zoning, authorize the fee for such application be funded through the Parks and Recreation Department and authorized staff to represent the Board for the Zoning request. B. Revocable License Agreement- Florida Department of Transportation U.S. Highway One- The Board approved the Revocable License Agreement authorized the Chainnan to sign the Revocable authorized the Chainnan to sign the Agreement and instructed staff to record the Revocable License Agreement in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. C. Pennission to file suit against George Porter, III and George Pòrter, Jr.- The Board approved pennitting the County Attorney to file suit against George Porter III and George Porter Jr., to require the removal of unserviceable vehicles, trash, junk, overgrowth, debris and cease operating a business without a license. D. B & E Houck Enterprises, Inc.,- The Board approved the consent to the sublease agreement between B & E Houck Enterprises, and Composite Builder Assist & Services, Inc. E. Resolution No. 06-149- Extending the State of Local Emergency- The Board approved Resolution No. 06-149 and authorized the Chainnan to sign the Resolution. F. Black Pearl Boat Ramp- Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority- Force Main Easement- The Board approved the Easement in favor ofFPUA subject to the approval of Florida Boating Improvement Program and FIND and authorized the Chainnan to execute the easement and directed staff to record the easement in the Public Records ofSt. Lucie County. G. Closed Above Ground Fuel Fann- The Board approved the proposed Work Limited Site Assessment # 3 with Ardaman & Associates. 3. ADMINISTRATION Land Acquisition Selection Committee- The Board ratified the appointment of Dr. Carol Costas to the Land Acquisition Selection Committee. 4. PARKS REFERENDUM A. Ownership and Encumbrance Title Search on four parcels at the Lawnwood Complex- The Board approved the use of$I,OOO.OO to complete the title search of four parcels at the Lawnwood Complex. B. Work Authorization to Hazen and Sawyer PC- The Board approved issuing a work authorization to Hazen and Sawyer in the amount of $5,400.00 for the preparation of right of way sketches and legal descriptions of three parcels adjacent to SR607 in St. Lucie County as required by the Florida Department of Transportation. C. Change Order to Recreational Design and Construction- Contract No. 04-07-565- The Board approved issuing a change order in the amount of $27,797.00 toRDC. 5. AIRPORT A. Authorization to Purchase Runway/Street Sweeper- The Board approved the purchase ofTYMCO Model 435 Regenerative Air Street 2 ------ ---.""" ._----~_.- Sweeper with trade of$5,000 for current sweeper for a total cost of $75,464.13. B. Approve Change Order No.2 to contract C05-l2-666 for Dickerson, Florida- The Board approved Change Orde4r No.2 for Dickerson, to rehabilitate Taxiway E in the amount of $737,243.92 and authorized the Chainnan to execute. C. Approved Kimley Horn Work Authorization No. 24 for Airport Rescue Facility Ditch relocation- The Board approved Kimley Home Authorization No.24 and authorized the Chair to execute. D. The Board approved Work Authorization No. 14 for PBS&J to update Layout Plan for the SLC IntI. Airport at a cost of$50,967.00 subject to the offer and acceptance of a $48,450.00 grant fÌ"om the FAA with a 2.5% grant fÌ"om FDOT and a 2.5% local match, both totaling $2,550.00 and approved the Chair to execute the same. E. Extension of on month for termination of Lease Agreement with Platts Grove, Inc., changing the tennination date fÌ"om May 1,2006 to June 1, 2006- The Board approved the extension. 6. PARKS AND RECREATION A. The Board approved serving alcohol at the Indrio Road School House on May 13th for the Talley Benefit. B. Construction of Pole Barn- The Board approved the re-allocation of $9,000.00 fÌ"om the machinery and equipment account to construct a pole barn at the Fairgrounds. C. Release of Retain age- The Board approved making the final payment and release the retainage to Rodda Construction Company in the amount of$lO,OOOb for Hurricane Frances repairs to Tradition Field Stadium. D. Authorize to purchase a drill press- Budget Amendment BA06-l49- and Equipment Request EQ06-269- The Board approved Budget Amendment BA06-l49 to purchase a drill press EQ06-269 for the maintenance shop at a cost of$1,200.00. E. Authorization to purchase a storage unit (Equipment Request EQ06- 268 and Budget Amendment BA06-l48- The Board approved the equipment and the budget amendment at a cost of$1,813.00. 7. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET Deletion fÌ"om Fixed Asset Inventory accordance with the procedures outlined in the purchasing manual, section 18.4- The Board approved removing items fÌ"om the inventory and adding replacement items to inventory. 8. PUBLIC SAFETY A. Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity Renewal of Coast Care Advanced Life Support Transport Services for a Class B & F CON- The Board approved the renewal. B. Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity- Pennission to advertise for Public Hearing on application of American Medical response for Class B & F- The Board approved advertising the public hearing for June 13, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. 3 --- -- "..--..------.,- 9. CENTRAL SERVICES A. Draft Interlocal Agreement between SLC and the City ofFt. Pierce for the use of the Melody Lane Right of way adjacent to the County Parking Lot on the side to provide additional parking spaces- The Board approved staff drafting an Interlocal Agreement as prepared by the County Attorney and proceed to present the agreement to the City of Ft. Pierce for their review and approval. B. Reallocation of available funds- The Board approved reallocating available funds from the Rock Road Jail Expansion Project from public buildings impact fee reserves to the new Clerk of Court Construction project Contingency. C. Request for Work Authorization with Edlund Dritenbas Brinley Architects through Continuing Contract C05-05-248- The Board approved the Work Authorization to C05-05-248for Professional Architectural Services at a cost of $8,200.00 for a program forum on the subject of the new structure at Rive3r Park Marina to replace the Port St. Lucie Yacht Club approved Budget Amendment No. 06-150 and authorized the Chair to sign the Work Authorization asw prepared by the County Attorney. 10. PUBLIC WORKS Engineering Division Civil Engineer Position Re-class to Senior Project Engineer _ The Board approved the reclassification request 06-006. 11. COMMUNITY SERVICES A. Request for Board approval and authorize the Chair to sign the Joint Participation Agreement Supplement # 1, Resolution No. 06-137 and the FDOT Maintenance Agreement for project number FM418257 -1- 94- The Board approved the Chair signing the JP A Supplement, Resolution No. 06-137, Budget Resolution No. 06-13 and the FDOT Maintenance Agreement for project number Fm418257 -1-94-01. B. The Board authorized staff to submit a grant application to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development for $300,780.00 for tenant rental assistance for disabled homeless adults. In addition authorized the Chair to sign all federal fonns associate with the grant application. C. The Board authorized staff to submit a Service Development grant for $80,000 to FDOT for marketing the fixed routes in St. Lucie and Martin counties. D. The Board approved the First Amendment to CDBG Contract for Rehabilitation Work to reference the contracts between the contractor, the homeowner and the Home Again Contract and authorized the Community Services Director to sign any necessary documents to initiate the amendment. 12. ENVIRONMENTAL RESOURCES A. Glatting and J ackson- The Board approved the Contract with Gla~ing and Jackson to prepare the Bicycle Pedestrian Greenways and TraIls Master Plan and authorized the Chainnan to sign the amendment as prepared by the County Attorney's office. 4 .------- ---~- -.---....--... ."-. B. Ten Mile Creek Recreation Area- Frisbee Golf Course- The Board approved transferring $6,000 fÌ"om 316-3920-563000-310035 to 316- 3920-563000-3631 for construction of a Frisbee Golf Course. 13. PURCHASING G. H. I. J. K. A. First Amendment to Contract C05-08-485 with Gense4t Services, Inc., for generator preventative maintenance, service inspections and load bank testing- The Board approved the first amendment to Contract C05-08-485and authorized the Chainnan to sign the amendment as prepared by the County Attorney. B. Award of Bid No. 06-034- Baling and Recycling Facility Expansion- The Board approved awarding Bid No. 06-034 to the low bidder David Engineering and Construction Inc. For the total amount of $1,554,700.00 and authorized the Chainnan to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. C. Approval ofHUITicane Related Purchases- The Board approved the attached list of hurricane related purchases. D. Award of Bid No. 06-033 Concrete Culvert and Asphalt Installation- The Board approved awarding bid # 06-033 to South Florida Concrete as the primary contractor, Hanley Martin Corp as the first alternate, and Sunshine Land Designs as the second alternate per the attached bid tabulation, pennission for the Chainnan to sign the contracts as prepared by the County Attorney. E. Pennission to Advertise a Request for Proposals for Operation and Maintenance Services for Water, Wastewater and Reclamation Water System- The Board approved advertising an RFP. F. Pennission to advertise an Invitation for Bids for the resurfacing of Paradise Park Pool- The Board approved advertising an Invitation for Bids. Donation ofSurplus(abandoned) Acquaculture Equipment- The Board approved the donation of the surplus aquaculture equipment to the University of Florida/IF AS Indian River4 Research and Education Center. Cancel Bid No. 06-057- St. Lucie Parking Garage- The Board approved canceling the bid for the Parking Garage due to the lack of competition and the need to revise the specifications. The Boar also approved re-advertising the bid. Pennission to advertise a RFP for a coffee vending machine to be located on the third floor lobby area of the Administration building- The Board approved advertising the RFP. Scrivener error on March 21, 2006 Agenda Request to Approve Work Authorization No.8 should have stated work authorization number 9 to contract C03-02-369- The Board approved the correction to the Scrivener's error and authorized the Chainnan to sign the amendment with the corrected number- amendment no. 9 to C03-02-269 with Kimley Horn and Assoc., for the total amount of $74,300.00 as prepared by the County Attorney. The Board approved to reject all bids for Bid No. 05-082- Abandonment and Plugging of Artesian and Flow wells, and granted pennission to re-advertise the invitation for bid. 5 -- -- --- L. The Board approved advertising a Request for Proposals for a collection system that would collect overdue library fines. M. The.Board approved advertising an Invitation for Bids for Runway TaxIway Ramp Markings Rehabilitation. N. Award of Bid No. 06-021- The Board approved awarding Bid No,. 06-021 to the. low bidder, Tri-County Towing and Recovery according to the tabulation sheet and authorized the Chainnan to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. O. Eighth Amendment to Contract C02-04-399- with Tenninix- The Board approved the Eighth Amendment to Contract C02-04-399 with Tenninix which.extends the contract through and including August 31, 2006 and authonzed the Chainnan to sign the Amendment as prepared by the County Attorney and also authorized advertising an invitation for bid for pest control services. CONSENT AGENDA ADDITIONS CA-l. COMMUNITY SERVICES The Board approved the First Amendment to Grant Agreement C05-12-713 with Meridian Community Services Group, Inc., to increase the consideration of payment for services to reflect the agreed upon amount if 10% of the contract award and authorized the Chainnan to sign. CA-2. COMMUNITY SERVICES The Board approved the change order to Contract C05-10-494 (additional work to floors that apparent until work began and Contract C05-1 0-495(gutters not included with original bid with Alton M. Silver III Corp for home repairs under the Community Block Grant an State Housing Initiative Partnership programs and approval for final payments and release of retainage for these contracts. CA-3. COUNTY ATTORNEY Pennission to advertise- The Board approved advertising Proposed Ordinance No. 06- 027 (Creating Section 1-9-75, Removal of Debris ITom Public and Private Right of Way during a declared State of Local Emergency. Public Hearing on May 23,2006 at 9:00 a.m. REGULAR AGENDA 5.a no public hearings 6. ADMINISTRATION St. Lucie Cultural Affairs Council Board Vacancies- Consider staff recommendation to vote and appoint two at large members from applications submitted to the Cultural Affairs Council to fill vacancies. Upon tally of the votes: All five Commissioners voted for Burke Four Commissioners voted for Hodge One Commissioner for Antoniette 7. 2006 STRATEGIC PLANNING IMPLEMENTATION Parks and Recreation- S1. Lucie County Fairgrounds Master Plan- Consider staff recommendation to approve the Fairgrounds Conceptual Plan prepared by Bull?ck and Smith and conceptually approve relocation of a donated home ITom the CreeksIde 6 -----.~... -- -------...----- construction project and place it in the Pionee4r Village area of the Fairgrounds to be remodeled and used as a Fair Association office. The Central Services Director advised the Board he was advocating not moving the house due to the fact it is in very poor condition. Mr. Bill Blazak, Culpepper and Terpening, advised the Board that DR Horton was contributing $30,000 towards the relocation. They have labor resources and material to restore the house. They have also received approval from the state. Com. Smith stated he had concerns with the state saying to go ahead with it. Mr. Blazak advised the Board there would not be any taxpayer dollars utilized for this project. Ms. Jeanie Keaton, General Manager of the Fair addressed the location of the house and gave an overview of the fair event. Mr. Roger Shinn, Central Services Director advised the Board he looked at the house and stated there are some areas that need to be removed totally. Com. Smith stated he would like to know specifics about the house. He does not have a problem with the Master Plan but does have a concern with the house and not knowing the specifics. Com. Craft stated he supported the plan of moving the house with not cost to the county, however, he felt the village location should be the focal point of the area and not tucked away In a comer. Com. Coward stated he concurred with Com. Craft and would like infonnation as to why alternative locations are not suitable. Com. Coward stated he would like to review specifics and make a decision within the next 2 weeks. He requested in put on the alternative locations. It was the consensus of the Board to bring this back at a later date. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Chainnan Clerk of Circuit Court 7 \ AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. 2A DA TE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ X ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 06-172 - Congratulating Fire Co-Owner Kurt Holden and the Fort Pierce Fire Minor League Football Team on Reaching the Tournament Finals for Two Consecutive Years; and Wishing them Continued Success in the Future. BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 06-172 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: &cì APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 Dougl s nderson County Administrator County Attorney: Jt Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 RESOLUTION NO. 06-172 A RESOLUTION CONGRA TULA TING FIRE CO-OWNER KURT HOLDEN AND THE FORT PIERCE FIRE MINOR LEAGUE FOOTBALL TEAM ON REACHING THE TOURNAMENT FINALS FOR TWO CONSECUTIVE YEARS; AND WISHING THEM CONTINUED SUCCESS IN THE FUTURE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. After winning the scrimmage game against the Venice Vikings 32-13; the Pre- Season Game against the Vero Hurricanes 21-0; and winning against the Greenville Knights 25-0, the Fort Pierce Fire Football Team won five games during the Regular Season from January 21, 2006, through March 25, 2006. 2. On April 8, 2006, the Fort Pierce Fire and Treasure Coast Pirates Minor League Football Teams began competition in the Southern States Football League Playoffs with a 25-10 win against the Spartans. 3. Although the Fort Pierce Fire Football Team was unable to win the Division Championship, this Board believes Mr. Kurt Holden and the Ft. Pierce Fire Minor League Football Team should be congratulated on reaching the Tournament Finals for two consecutive years. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, that this Board does hereby congratulate Fire Co-Owner Kurt Holden and the Fort Pierce Fire Minor League Football Team on reaching the Tournament Finals for two consecutive years; and further wishing them continued success in the future. \ PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 2006. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 2B DATE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ X ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 06-173 - Proclaiming Monday, May 15,2006, as "LAW ENFORCEMENT MEMORIAL DA Y"; and Proclaiming the week of May 14, 2006, through May 20, 2006, as "LAW ENFORCEMENT WEEK" in St. Lucie County, Florida. BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 06-173 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 Douglas Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: 01/ Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 - . \ RESOLUTION NO. 06-173 A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING MONDAY, MAY 15, 2006, AS "LAW ENFORCEMENT MEMORIAL DAY"; AND PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF MAY 14, 2006, THROUGH MAY 20, 2006, AS "LAW ENFORCEMENT WEEK" IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. The Congress and President of the United States have designated May 15 as Peace Officers' Memorial Day, and the week in which it falls as Law Enforcement Week. 2. The St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office has been constituted by the State of Florida to uphold the laws and play an essential role in safeguarding the rights and freedoms of the citizens of St. Lucie County. 3. It is important that all citizens know and understand the problems, duties, and responsibilities of their law enforcement agencies, and that members of our Sheriff's Office recognize their duty to serve the people by safeguarding life and property, by protecting them against violence or disorder, and by protecting the innocent against deception and the weak against oppression or intimidation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board does hereby proclaim Monday, May 15, 2006, as "LAW ENFORCEMENT MEMORIAL DAY" in honor of those peace officers \ who, through their courageous deeds, have lost their lives or have become disabled in the performance of their duty. 2. This Board does hereby further proclaim the week of May 14, 2006, through May 20, 2006, as uLAW ENFORCEMENT WEEK" with appropriate ceremonies in which all of our people may join in commemorating Sheriff's Deputies, past and present, who by their faithful and loyal devotion to their responsibilities have rendered a dedicated service to their communities. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 2006. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ..., J...- ITEM NO. a G DATE: May 16, 2006 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Environmental Resources Decartment PRG.~NTED BY: () " tJ.t,J Van s~~ ;() ~ Environmental Resources Director SUBJECT: Staff requests approval of the Indian River Lagoon Envirothon, Inc. request to pay travel expenses and plane fare ($4800) for the John Carroll High School Envirothon Team to attend the Canon North American Envirothon in Winnipeg, Canada. BACKGROUND: Friday, March 3, 2006, John Carroll High School competed in the 2006 State Envirothon Competition in Ocala. The John Carroll High School team took 1st place in the State Competition and will represent Florida in the National Competition this summer! This is the first time in fourteen years that any team from our region has advanced to the North American competition. The Envirothon Competition is a national competition that concentrates on the areas of the environment and nature. The five-person student teams perform experiments, do research, and study data to prepare for the competitions. They are then given an environmental topic competition and must answer orally and by written answers in front of a panel of judges. The John Carroll team of Andrew Irizarry, Suzie Irizarry, Amber Enns, Tommy Kiger, and Kyle Collins represented St. Lucie County in the competition. They competed against 29 other teams from Florida. The students will now travel to Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada July 23, 2006 through-July 29, 2006 to represent Florida and compete against 55 teams from the United States and Canada. FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds are available in 001-3920-540000-300 General Fund - Environmental Resources - Travel ($1,000), 001- 7912-540000-700 General Fund - Environmental Resources/Oxbow - Travel ($1,000), and Solid Waste 401-341 0- 540000-300 Solid .Waste - Travel ($2,800). PREVIOUS ACTION: NA RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the Indian River Lagoon Envirothon, Inc. request to pay travel expenses and plane fare ($4800) for the John Carroll High School Envirothon Team to attend the Canon North American Envirothon in Winnipeg, Canada. COMMISSION ACTION: bà APPROVED rl0THER: [ ] DENIED Approved 5-0 Do g as . Anderson County Administrator coordlnrO~ [X]Mgt. &.Budget [ ]Purchasm [x]County Attorney \,~ [x]Originating Dept [X] Finance Copy Only [ ]Growth Mgmt [X] Solid Waste ~ .. MAY-91-06 07:22 AM DOUG ANDERSON p.e2 ~61462164a >, . Indian River LagOOn F.nviMthnn.1nc. . , c/oKalhyUMaaD 210AnAWII.J: ~ FL3fJJ7 m2S041m..~~ - 561..m.mix April 28, 2006 5/'/°"- - ~ The Honorable Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re: Sponsorship for Canon Envirothon 2006 Dear Frannie: .'"~-''''''' . ., Earlier in the week we spoke about the Canon North AmerIcan Envlrothon. Envirothon is a problem solving, natural-resourœ education program for high-school students. The Indian River Lagoon Envirothon Is our regional competition between four c:ountles (Indian River, St. Lucie, Martin and Okeechobee). These teams compete In six different categories WATER, SOILS, FORESTRV WILDLIFE, CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUE and the INDIAN RIVER LAGOON. The winning teams from each county advance to the Florida State Envlrathon and the winning team from the State c:cmpetltion then advances to the Canon North American Envirothon. This year the Florida State Envlrothon winning team Is from St. Lucie County. This team ~ John Canoll High chaol will now spend 7 ~ays at the University of Manitoba In Winnipeg this summer camps . noes e 0 eriçan title along with scholarships and electronic equipment from Canon. The Indian River Lagoon Envirothon pays for its County winners to attend the State event The Florida State Envirothon pays the registration fee (includes food and lodging) for their winning team to advance to the Intema~aI competition, but the team and their teacher are e)(peCted to pay travel expenses and the plane fare to Canada will cost them $4,800. I am the vlce-Chair of the Indian River Lagoon Envirothon and t also sit on the Board for the Florida Envlrothon. St. Lucie Countt should be very proud of their team from John Carroll High School. It Is the flt'8t time in 14 years that any team from our region has advanœd to the North American competition. Besides that, I have seen this particular team work their way to the top over the last four years. They are an outstanding group of kids and their teacher. Beau Roberts Is nothing 8hort of spectacular. Therefore, I am alklng you and the rest of the St Lucie County Commission If you would help finance )OUr team's trip to Canada. They wo'dd not only be reoresenting the State \ ) MAY-01-06 07:22 AM DOUC ANDERSON =:5614621648 . ¡ . .' . Page 2 April 28, 2006 of Florida. but St. Lucie County as well and we should all take pride in·the fact that our children are aware of the environmental problems that are before us today and that they are actually working to solve those problems through knowledge, experience and teamwork. Thank for your time and consideration in this matter. If you have any questions ór need any additional Information, please feel free carl me at 1-800.250-4100 extension 3603. I look forward to hearing from you In the near future. Sincerely, Kathy laMartina, Vice Chair Indian Rlve1Lsgoon Envlrothon P.03 \ nRY-~l-~b ~7l21 AM DOUG ANDERSON Nature :5614621648 P.S1 !lage J 01 1 LiZ Martin . Envlrothon T.am Sponsor -111 I . _.... , I "-'1" W"I." __ I 11 1 From: To: Date: Subject: CC: "LaMartina, Kathryn" cklarnartSsfwmd,IO'Þ cUz~o,st·lucte.ft.up ../28/2006 10:03 AM Envtrothon Team Sponsor "beau roberts· crobertsbea~hotmall,com. ----.-. ---.---.-.....- Frannie, Thank you very much for considerinl our request tor hllp WIth travel expenses for the St. Luefe County Team to attend the Canon North Amertcan Envirothon, I have attached a letter of request. I also flJCed you a sllned copy. If there Is anythlnl else you need, please feet free to pe me'a call, XAtm-yn .ta!M47'tiM· Sr. Water Resource MI nager M.rtin/Sl Lucie Service Center South Florida Water Management District (772) 223- 2eOO x3803 "f" . -r.¡' .. .. .. .. Thanks apin. I know the kids win appreciate anythinl you can do. ~ q.'\ " rf ~IJV Kathy .·t.·. ·ï\·.!·,..·¡··.·....¡·:~,:·..;>·......~: '. ..... ". " ...... " .·.I....·,.·,·.i..~....·_· a..··" "0,' .'. -:.:.'~tY.l 1.1:..~1¡,,',¡¡r:!-"1'õ, ......", jl---,. ,~\~ t: I. ,~, r _ fI' " .., u.¡..,!.JfJ;'..rr ~'''''JoiIO':":,» ~ "iJ ~..r ' ~ :¡..; . ,I n.4 ¡,' . :4-;'j'I,:~ ~1.':" p\ J~~ ~ . OF "'}:"..,,"t.. ~~t; ,~. 'W" " ¡ ,. ..~ .' , . Xtk"'"'':il"..C\l, ~e >".,¡ ~"' "', ,I,) '·I·it~·,· '. ~"'"' ¡'I>"". "it",..,",;. J". .\ .~.oo. . \. . ': ,~. . I' ~:-:·2, '.- -"', :. .~_:.;-" _ .~~ ~;~ ';'_.'.~~)_' ,/:¡f fite:IIC:\Documenta%20and%20Settinp\Adminiatrator\Local%20Scttings\ Temp\XPGrp W... 4/2812006 SA Consulting Engineers · Land Surveyors 2980 South 25th Street . Ft. Pierce, FL 34981 (772) 464-3537 . Fax (772) 464-9497 www.ct-eng.com Sender's e-mail: Job Number: dmurphy@ct-enq,com 04-168 May 15, 2006 Mr. Hank Flores, Planning Manager St. Lucie County Growth Management Department 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 Subject: Toilers' Cove Planned Unit Development Request for Continuance Dear Mr. Flores: As we discussed last week, because of an unexpected conflict in schedules, I would at this time request that the public hearing for the Tailers' Cove Planned Unit Development, currently identified as Agenda Item 5A on the May 16, 2006, County Commission Agenda, be continued until the Boards next night meeting on June 6, 2006. Thank you for your consideration of this matter. I will be present at the boards meeting of the 16th to address any questions that come up. Sincerely, ~LPEPPER & TERPENING, INC. M''-'\~1 Den i~ JI Murp , ICP Senior Project an ger DJM P: \Proj-2004 \04-168 Toilers Cove \Corr\ltr\04-168-flores-3 ,doc ,. ~ \S"'tiT.-1OOi@IIEJïI...,_ COUNTY o'¿.,_ f LOR I D A~ ~ To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED CJ OTHER Agenda Request Item Number Date: Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] Board of County Commissioners Growth Management !:J A- 05/16/06 [ ] [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ X ] Presented By ~roM~~ Consider Draft Resolution No. 06-155 granting a Change in Zoning from the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential 'District) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Tailers' Cove) Zoning District, and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the project to be known as Tailers' Cove - PUD for 14.39 acres of property located on the west side of South SR A-1-A, directly across from the Atlantis condominiums. . The petitioner, Tailers' Cove Development. LLC, has requested a Change in Zoning from the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Tailerš' Cove) Zoning District, and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the project to be known as Tailers' Cove - PUD for 14.39 acres of property located on the west side of South SR A-1-A, directly across from the Atlantis condominiums to develop 24 Condominium units in 11 buildings. (File No.: RZ-05- 010/PUD-05-009) N/A At the December 8. 2005, public hearing on this matter, the S1. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 7 to 0 with one member (Mr. Trias) absent, recommended approval of "the requested change in zoning and preliminary plann"ed development site plan. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution No. - conditions. Approved 5-0 Motion to grant approval to applicants request to continue to June 6, 2006 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. 06-155, subject to 5 limiting D DENIED ZENCE ~ glas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: ~ Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget: \ \ ~ EnYir. Resources DiY.:' \. J Purchasing: Road & Bridge DiY.: Transmittal Master Checklist - Tailers'Cove - PUD Primary Distribution Sent Received Environmental Resources Department. Amy Mott: X X Public Works Surveyor - Ron Harris: X X Road. Bridge, & Transportation - Scott Herring: X X Stormwater Management - Chris Lestrange: X X General Engineering - Michael Pöwley: X X County Attorney Property Acquisitions - JaAnn Riley: X X St. Lucie County Sheriffs Office - Major Monahan: X X St Lucie County Fire District - Chief Buddy Emerson: X X Residential Only School Board of St Lucie County - Marty Sanders: X Geoaraphical Based St Lucie County Utility Department - Mike Bowers: X X Commission Review: May 16, 2006 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commis$ioners Bob Nix, AICP, Director of Growth Management ~ (ß Hank Flores, Planning Manager ~¡. May 10, 2006 THROUGH: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: ,Application of Tailers' Cove Development, LLC~ for a Change in Zoning from the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Tailers' Cove) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan approval for the project to be known as Tailers' Cove - PUD. LOCATION: West side of South SR A-1-A, directly across from the Atlantis condominiums. EXISTING ZONING: HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) PROPOSED ZONING: PUD (Planned Unit Development .;.. Tailers' Cove) CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE: RU (Residential Medium) PARCEL SIZE: 14.39 acres 11.21 acres - land above the Mean High Water line 3.18 acres - land below the Mean High Water line PROPOSED USE: 24 Condominium units in 11 buildings. PROPOSED DENSITY: 2.14 dwelling units per acre SURROUNDING ZONING: HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) to the north, south, east, and west. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing land uses surrounding the property are multiple-family condominiums and some commercial. The Future Land Use Classification of the surrounding area is RU (Residential Urban) to the south, west, and north. RM (Residential Medium) to the east. May 10, 2006 Page 2 Subject Tailers Cove Preliminary PUD fiRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #8 (7583 South Ocean Drive), is located approximately 1/2 mile to the north. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property will be serviced with water from the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) and sewer service will be provided by the St. Lucie County Utilities Department. .TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-Of-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way width for South SR A-1- is 100 feet. , SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: TYPE Of CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: , None. Concurrency Deferral Affidavit. *********************************************************************** STANDARDS Of REVIEW AS SET fORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE ..' In reviewing this application for proposed rezóning, the Planning and Zoning Gommission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed change in zoning and petition for preliminary Planned Unit Development is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. There are a total of 24 multiple-family, units in, 11 buildings - 9 - two units buildings and 2 - three units buildings - proposed, in this development. If the subject property were to be developed at the maximum density possible in the Future Land Use Classification of RU (Residential Urban) - 5 dwelling unit per acre and R/C (Residential/Conservation) - 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres, 41 units might be possible. The site plan that is submitted as a part of this rezoning to PUD is consistent with the provisions of the Land Development Code. 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements, of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The proposed Tailers' Cove - PI,JD is consistent with the general purpose,goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. May 10, 2006 Page 3 Subject: Tailers Cove Preliminary PUD Policy 1.1.1.1 of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes maximum residential densities of RU (Residential Urban) - 5 dwelling unit per acre and RlC (Residential/Conservation) - 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres. The proposed project is to be developed with a maximum residential density of 2.14 units per acre; therefore, the proposed project is consistent with this policy. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The proposed change in zoning to PUD for the purpose of allowing the construction of a multiple-family residential development is not inconsistent with the proposed future land use classification of the subject property and surrounding properties. The St. Lucie County Comprehensive' Plan designates the subject property with a Future Land Use Classification of RU (Residential Urb~n) - 5 dwelling unit per acre and RlC (Residential/Conservation) 1 dwelling unit per 5 acres. The proposed PUD has a gross density of 2.14 dwelling units per acre. Overall density based on the RU Future Land Use Classification is 3.01. ' 4. Whether there have, been changed conditions that require an amendment; There have not been changes that would require an amendment. The site is located inside Of the Urban Service .Boundary òf St. Lucie County. 'Water services will be provided through the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) and sewer services through the St. Lucie County Utilities Department. 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which, the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; The proposed site plan, which is tied to this rezoning, would create additional demands on water/sewer facilities in this area. The subject property is located inside of the Urban Service Boundary of St. Lucie County. The public school system can be expected to be responsible for the education of an 10 additional students. Drainage will be handled through a master drainage system which requires permits from the South Florida Water Management District (S.F.W.M.D.), as well as, a St. Lucie County Stormwater permit. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed change in zoning and development of this site as a residential planned unit development is not expected to result in any adverse environmental impact. The Environmental Resources Department has reviewed the proposed project and has recommended conditions of approval listed below. The west 10.93 acres of the 'proposed project contain Class I wetlands and have been May 10, 2006 Page 4 Subject: Tailers Cove Preliminary PUD designated under a conservation easement. The remainder of the site consists of some tropical hardwoods (0.31 acre) and disturbed land, Brazilian peppers, and Australian Pines (2.6 acres). There is no native Upland habitat remaining on the site. Existing Conditions: The Tailers' Cove project is 14.39 acres located on South Hutchinson Island on the west side of SR A1A. The entire site currently has 11.21 acres above mean high water line and 3.18 acres below mean high water line. According to the applicant's Environmental Impact Report" (dated 26 April 2005) vegetation coverage on- the site consists of 2.25 acres of "Bra~ilian pepper", 0.31 acres of "tropical hardwoods", 0.01 acres of "Australian pine", 11.19 acres of mangrove swamp", 0.34 acres of disturbed lands". and 0.29 acres of "mosquito control berm". Proposed Impacts: Dunes The entire project site is west of SR A1A. Tailers' Cove will utilize existing dune crossing walkway, therefore, no impacts on the east side of SR A1A are proposed as no construction related to the easement providing access to the ocean though the Claridge by the Sea Condominium is proposed. Wetlands The applicant proposes to impact approximately one acre of a heavily impacted portion of the existing wetlands. Mitigation will be provided by preserving and restoring the remaining, high quality wetlands, on site, and, should SFWMD or ACOE determine any additional mitigation credits are required; they, will be purchased from the Bear Point Mitigation Bank. SFWMD has issued ERP Application number 050914-5 for this project. At the request of the SFWMD, the proposed culvert on the western dike will not be installed, as installation would be difficult, given the presence of both seagrass beds and a large breach in the berm. Additionally, the spoil mounds found west of the mosquito ditch will not be scraped down as that will do more harm than gOod to the existing wetland. The exotics will be removed from the spoil piles and both black and white mangroves will be planted. Other native vegetation presently existing on these mounds will be left in place. The applicant has requested a meeting to verífy wetland lines with J. Brandon Howard of the ACOE. As soon as the lines are verified and surveyed in, this information will be forwarded to ERD. ERP permit application number SAJ-2005-663 (IP-JBH) has been issued by ACOE, and a copy of the permit will be forwarded to the County upon issuance. Wetland Buffers The applicant is requesting a waiver to Section 6.02.02 C of theSt. Lucie County Land Development Code which requires an upland buffer adjacent to the Indian River Lagoon a minimum of fifty feet from the mean high water line. The applicant proposing permanent impacts to 3,841 square feet of the required buffer, and is proposing to mitigate this .impact by providing in excess of 6,900 May 10, 2006 Page 5 Subject: Tailers Cove Preliminary PUD square feet of extra buffer (please refer to Landscape plan - sheet 7 on October 28th submittal package) including areas that have over 100 ft from the wetland delineation line. Indian River Lagoon The applicant is proposing an eleven slip boat dock, to be permitted through the U5ACOE that will avoid and minimize impacts to the existing seagrass beds to the greatest extent possible. Listed Species No listed animal species were observed inhabiting the project site. The applicant is proposing an eleven Slip boat dock, to be permitted through the U5ACOE that will avoid and minimize impacts to thê existing seagrass beds, the mangroves, and the West Indian Manatee to the greatest extent possible. Upland Native HabitatNegetation Protection The applicant is proposing to preserve and improve over 14,000 square feet (100% of existing Upland Hammock) of existing upland habitat on the property. E~otic species will be removed and native plant species will be replanted. A Preserve Area Management Plan was submitted identifying the boundaries of the wetland and upland areas to be preserved. The PAMP addresses exotic plant removal, and native plant restoration, as well as proposed preserve area sign details and locations, nature trail details, and a schedule of the proposed monitoring program. The Homeowner Association will be' responsible for the perpetual management of the wetland and upland preserve areas. A conservation easement will be placed over the uplands and wetlands to be preserved. 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; An orderly and logical development pattern will result with this change in zoning. The subject property is located in an area of several' high-rise developments. Claridge-by-the-5ea and Atlantis Condominiums are located to the east across 5R A-1-A. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with" the pubUc interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment is not in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the 51. Lucie County Land Development Code. May 10, 2006 Page 6 Subject: Tailers Cove Preliminary PUD COMMENTS The applicant, Tailers' Cove, LLC., is proposing a residential development of 24 multiple-family units in 11 buildings on 14,,39 acres of land located on the west side of South SR A-1-A, across from the Atlantis Condominiums. The project is to be known as Tailers' Cove- PUD. As a Planned Unit Development, the applicant proposes to develop the subject property with some flexibility. Section 7.01.03(1) of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that 35% of the site must consist of open space. The proposed planned development maintains the west 10.39 acres in conservation. The remainder of the project consists of those areas designated for residential development (buildings, roadway, driveways, and sidewalks). The proposed project also indicates an access pier through the wetland area and a proposed 11 slip boat dock. A beach access easement has been provided on the east side of South SR A-1-A on the south side of the Claridge-by-the-Sea Condominium. At the December 8, 2005, public hearing on this matter, the S1. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 7 to 0 with' one member (Mr. Trias) absent, recommended approval of the requested change in zoning and preliminary planned development site plan. Staff has determined that the proposed zoning designation and the Preliminary Planned Unit. Development site plan are compatible with the èxisting and proposed uses in the area. This petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the S1. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the petition, subject to the following conditions: 1. The Final Planned Unit Development Site Plan site plan shall identify locations and separate sizes of each individual preserve area, including the native upland habitat preserves, the wetland preserves, and the " buffer preserves. In order to mitigate for the .2,133 square feet of impacts to the 50 foot buffer, .the developer, his successors or assigns, shall specifically identify the additional 3,199.5 square feet to the buffer (2,133 mitigated at a ratio of 1: 1.5). ' 2. Prior to the approval of the Final PUD, the site plan shall identify the locations and separate sizes of each separate preserve area, including the native upland habitat preserves, the wetland preserves, and the buffer preserves. ' 3. Prior to the approval of the Final PUD, the site plan shall identify the existing on-site wetland as "Category I". 4. A revised PAMP (reflecting all changes requested by the SFWMD) shall be submitted for S1. Lucie County's files, as well as forthe future Home Owners Association. 5. Prior to the approval of the Final PUD, a copy of the Conservation Easement shall be submitted for S1. Lucie County's files as soon as it is signed and recorded. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution No. 06-155, which, if approved, would grant the request of Tailers' Cove Development, LLC. for Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known as Tailers' Cove - PUD. May 10, 2006 Page 7 Subject: Tailers Cove Preliminary PUD Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. SUBMITTED: ~ C-t ~() Bob Ni ,AICP Growth Management Director Attachment hf cc: Juan Bermudez - Tailers' Cove, Development, LLC. Terry L. Virta, AICP - Terry L. Virta & Associates, Inc. Dennis J. Murphy, AICP - Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 RESOLUTION NO. 06-155 FILE NO: PUD-05-009/RZ-05-010 A RESOLUTION GRANTING PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS TAILERS' COVE - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of Sf. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Tailers' Cove. LLC., presented a petition for Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known as T ailers' Cove for the construction of a total of 24 multiple-family units for pròperty located on the west side of South SR A-1-A, directly across from the Atlantis Condominiums. 2. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet minimum technical requirements. 3. On December 8, 2005, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and recommended -that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known as Tailers' Cove - PUD, for the property depicted on the attached Maps as Exhibit "A" and described in Part B below. 4. On May 16, 2006, the Sf. Luèie County Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing, of which due public notice was publis.hed and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the -hearing, and. granted Preliminary Development Plan approval for the' project to be known Whispering T ailers' Cove - PUD. 5. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan,and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 6. The proposed project will not have an undue, adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. 7. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping, and screening. File No.: PUD-05-009/RZ-05-010 May is, 2006 Resolution NO.OS-155 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 8. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 9. The proposed project will be served by adequate private facilities and services. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Preliminary Site Plan for the project to be known as T ailers' Cove - A Planned'Unit Development be, and the same is hereby approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project ' prepared by Culpepper & Terpening, Inc., dated Marcl125,2006, and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director on March 30, 2006, for the property described below, subject to the following conditions: 1. Thè Final Planned Unit Development Site Plan site plan shall identify locations and separate sizes of each individual preserve area, including the native upland habitat preserves, the wetland preserves, and the buffer preserves. In order to mitigate for the 2,133 square feet of impacts to the 50 foot buffer, the developer, his successors or assigns, shall specifically identify the additional 3, 199.5 square feet to the buffer (2,133 mitigated at a ratio of 1 :1.5). 2. Prior to the approval of the Final PUD, the site plan shall identify the locations and separate sizes of each separate preserve area, including the native upland habitat preserves, the wetland preserves, and the buffer preserves. 3. Prior to the.approval of the Final PUD, the site plan shall identify the existing on-site wetland as "Category 1". 4. ,A revised PAMP (reflecting all changes requested by the SFWMD) shall be submitted for St. Lucie County's files, as well, as for the future Home Owners Association. 5. Prior to the approval of the Final PUD, a copy ofthe Conservation Easement shall be submitted for St. Lucie County's files as soon as it is signed and recorded. B. The property on which this Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval is being granted is described as follows: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH 400 FEET OF THE SOUTH ONE-HALF OF GOVERNMENT LOT 5, IN SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 37 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST LYING WEST OF STATE ROAD A-1-A (SOUTH OCEAN DRIVE) AND ALSO DESCRIBED AS: File Nò.: PUD-05-009/RZ-05-010 May 16, 2006 Resolution No. 06-155 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 THE NORTH 400 FEET OF PARCEL G, LYING WEST OF STATE ROAD A-1-A (SOUTH OCEAN DRIVE), F.E. ENGLAR'S PLAT SURVEY, ACCORDING TO THE MAP OR PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, PAGE 13, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. (Location: East side of South SR A-1-A, directly across from the Atlantis Condominiums) C. This Preliminary Planned Unit Developmen~ approval shall expire on May 16, 2008, unless an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(B)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code or Final Planned Unit Developmen~ approval has been granted. D. - A copy ot" this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Part A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director. E. A copy of this Order shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Section A, which plan shall be on file with the St. Lucie County Gro~h Management Director. F. This Order shall be recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. After motion and sècond, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward xxx XXX Vice-Chairman Chris Craft Commissioner Paula A. Lewis xxx Commissioner Joseph E. Smith xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED'this 16th Day of May 2006. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman File No.: PUD-05-009/RZ-05-010 May 16, 2006 Resolution No. 06-155 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2'2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 ATTEST: Deputy Clerk APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney hf H:\WORD\Petitions\BCC\FINISHED.06\TailersCovePreliminaryPUDFD\T ailei'sCovePreliminaryPUD-RES.doc File No.: PUD-05-009/RZ-05-010 May 16, 2006 Resolution No. 06-155 Page 4 1 2 3 4 EXHIBIT "A" 5 6 7 8 . General Location Map 9 . Area Subject to Preliminary Pianned 10 Unit Development Approval, 11 . Site Plan Graphics 12 13 14 15 16 .17 18 File No.: PUD-05-009/RZ-05-010 May 16, 2006 Resolution No. 06-155 Page 5 () ...J ...J 0 .,j ~ c: 0 Q) I LC') II) E 0 0 0 0- N A.. N 0 ~ Ili Q) a:: Z+. N J ~l ~ :Ii '- > oð Q) .c Q) 0') t~ E 0 ~ Q) 0 ~ I ð Q) 0 oce~\\ Z > I .~ I -g 0 LC') 0 '- () ell ~~ a. 0 ~ ~~ a. :) ~ a. C- eil ::E II,,!. >- 1: =' o Ü c: 'E co ,';::E >. 1: :> 8 ... ~ ä:: c: ro '6 E ! ~ ",.II!' UIr¥ I . . 11Nr.¡~"I-I ~ û ! § I....::) w;-:) l ð Æ¡uno:) aaqolpaa>¡o · A petition of Tailers' CO",", Development, LLC for Preliminary and Final Planned Unit Development Approval for the Project to be known as Tailers' Cove - PUD ~ 9:'. ~ ':) ~. z. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. (') o ~ ~ PUD 05-009 & RZ 05-010 Legend Wj Subject property 5è~~~~_ ' N 9r_rli .JIIlZ7IU(1emnrt 2J'9'armumt 1\ Map prepared November 16, 2005 ~ Zoning Tailers~ Cove Development, LLC HIRD CPUB HIRD CPUB ~ - 9;'. ~ -a. z. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~. (') o 'J> ~ PUD 05-009 & RZ 05-010 Legend ~ Subject property 5è ~uc4e ð~~~. N IfriTW#í .JIIanuuemnot ZJ9'Ø'tM.tmt Î\ Map prepared November 16, 2005 ~ Land Use Tailers' Cove Development, LLC ~ 9:. ~ (?. z. ~ RlC CPUB RU - CPUB ~ ~ ., ~. (:')- o ~, ~ ':'- - PUD 05-009 & RZ 05-010 Legend ~ Subject property 5è~~~~_ (jrl1"Wtli ,N",,,,,,,,øment :D9"""twrent N Â Map prepared November 16, 2005 Tailers* Cove Development, LLC PUD 05-009 Legend & RZ 05-01 0 ~ Subject property N Mappr~par~d NOY~rf\b~r16, 2005 A ~u~~;CO" {irO'Wtli Management Ð'!Partment CHAPTER VII DEVELOPMENT DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 7.00.00 GENERAL PROVISIONS 7.00.01 PURPOSE The purpose of this Chapter is to provide development design and improvement standarçs applicable to development activity in the unincorporated area of the County. 7.01.00 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 7.01.01 PURPOSE The Planned Unit Development (PUD) District is intended to achieve residential land development of superior quality through the encouragement of flexibility and creativitY in design options that: A. permit creative approaches to the development of residential land reflecting changes in the technology of land development; B. allow for the efficient use of land. which can result in smaller networks of utilities and streets and thereby lower d.evelopmenl costs; C. allow design options that encourage an environment of stable character, compatible with surrounding land uses; and D. permit the enhancement of neighborhoods through the preservation of natural features, the provision of underground utilities, and the provision of recreation areas , and open space. 7.01.02 AUTHORIZED USES A. PERMITTED USES . Any permitted, conditional or accessory use in the Agricultural-1 (AG-1); Agricultural-2.5 (AG-2.5); Agricultural-5 (AG-5); Residential/Conservation in the Agricultural-1 (AG-1); Agricultural-2.S (AG-2.5); Agricultural-S (AG-S); Residential/Conservation (RC); Residential, Estate-1 (RE-1); Residential, Estate-2 (RE-2); Residential, Single-Family-2 (R5-2); Residential. Single-Family-3 (RS-3); Residential. Single-Family~ (R5-4); Residential, Multiple-Family-5 (RM-5); Residential. Mobile Home- S (RMH~5); Residential. Multiple-Family-7 (RM-7); Residential. Multiple-Family-9 (RM-9); Residential, 'Multiple-Family-11 (RM-11); and Residential, Multiple-Family-15 (RM-15) zoning districts of this Code may be permitted in a Planned Unit Development District subject to complying with the residential densities described in Section 7.01.03(8). ~AusJÙSt 1.1890 375 Reviled Through DlW1mo Seclron 7.0' .00 Plann~d Unll D~ve)opmenl B. NONRESIDENTIAl DEVELOPMENT USES Uses of the types permitted in the Commercial. Neighborhood (CN) District are also permitted up to an amount not to exceed three (3) percent of the gross area of the Planned Unit Development or ten (10) acres. whichever is less. In addition. playgrounds. pUblic and non-public parks. golf courses. country clubs. bicycle paths. racquet sports facilities. riding stables. marinas. clubhouses. and lodges may be permitted in a Planned Unit Development District. 7.01.03 STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS Standards and requirements for a Planned Unit Development shall be as follows: ' A. MINIMUM SIZE A Planned Unit Development shall be a minimum of five (5) contiguous acres of land under common ownership or control. B. DENSITY The maximum possible permitted density of a Planned Unit Development shall not exceed the density reflected in the Future Land Use Maps of the Comprehensive Plan. On North and South Hutchinson Island. the provisions of Section 3.01.03(AA)(B} shall govem. C. AREA. YARD. AND HEIGHT REOUIREMENTS Area. yard. and height requirements shall be determined at the 'time of Preliminary and Final Development Plan approval. excepUhatfor any structure on North Dr South Hutchinson Island thai has not been occupied. constructed. or has not received a building permit. site plan ot other County development ,approval as a permitted use prior to January 10. 1995 the requirements of Seclron 4.01.00. Hutchinson Island - Building Height Over1ay l.oneshall apply: D. PUBLIC FACJUTIES 1. The Planned Unit Development shall be designed and located so there will be no net public cost for the provision of water lines, sewage lines, storm and surface drainage systems. and other uWity systems. 2. The minimum size of an water mains used. or intended for use, in fire protection activities IS six (6·) inches. Actual water main requirements will be determined by the Sa. Luçie County- Ft. Pierce Fire Prevention Bureau. 3. The minimum size of "water mains used. or intended for use. in fire protection activities. that ere located on . dead-end water main is eight (8·) inches. Actual water main requirements wiD be determined by the St. Lucie County-Fl Pierce Fire Prevention Bureau. AdDpIiId ~I 1. 1110 371 ReviMd ThfDUIh 0&'01100 Se:llon 7.01,00 Planneo un.l Develo;:¡men: The maximum number of fire hydrants that may be located on any dead end water main is one (1). ~. Fire hydrants shall be provided at a minimum spacing of one every six hundred (600) feet unless otherwise approved by the St. Lucie County-Ft. Pierce FIre Prevention Bureau. E. TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION 1. Every dwelling unit, or other use permitted in the Planned Unit Development shall have access to a public street either directly or through an approved private road, a pedestrian way, or other area dedicated to public or private use. ' 2. Principal vehicular access points shall be designed to permit smooth traffic now with controlled tumingmovement and minimum hazards to vehicular or pedestrian traffic., Minor streets within ihe Planned Unit Development shall not be connected to streets outside the development so as to encourage their use by through traffic. 3. The proposed Planned Unit Development shall be designed so'that it will not create traffic congestion on the arterial and collector roads surrounding the project, or such surrounding collector or arterial roads shall be improved so that they will not be adversely affected. ~. All non-residential land uses within the Planned Unit Development shall have direct access to a collector or arterial street without creating traffic hazards or congestion on any street. 5. Streets in a Planned Unit Development may be dedicated to public use or retained under private ownership. Said streets and associated improvements shall comply with all pertinent County regulations and ordinances. however. variations to the standard minimum right-of- way widths may be considered as part of the Planned Unit Development if it is showñto the satisfaction of the Board of County Commissioners, that the requested variation is consistent with the intent of the County's roadway construction standards and necessary for the design of the Planned Unit Development. 6. All roads and streets shall intersect at an approximate ±So angle of ninety degrees (900) unlesS- circumstances acceptable to St. Lucie County.indicate a need for a lesser angle of intersection. 7. Street jogs or centertine offsets between any local street or road with another local street or road. shall be no less than one hundred fifty feet (150). 8. The intersection of any two local roads or streets with a Major Collector or Arterial Roadway shall be separated by a minimum distance of six hundred sixty feet (660). as measured from centerline to centerline. 9. Permanent dead-end streets shall not exceed one thousand feet (1000) in length. Cul-de-sacs shall be provided at the end of all dead end. roads or stre~ts greater than five ...... AuguSt 1. 1890 m Revised Through 0Il101100 Section 7.0'00 Plilnneo un,: [)evelOpmen: hundred and one (501) feet in length. The length ofa dead-end street shall be measured along the centerline of the Slreel from the its point of perpendicular inlersection wilh the centerline of intersecting street to the end of the dead-end street or roadway. All cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum right-of-way diameter of one hundred (100) feel. If the dead end roadway is five hundred (500) feet or less in length. a "Y" or"- type of tum around may be approved. If a dead end street is temporary in nature then a temporary cul-de-sac shall be reQuired until the roadway is connected to another street Dr road. In the center of t~e cuJ-de-sac an unpaved island,surrounded by a curb. improved with gra$s and landscaping that will not interfere with sight distance, may be provided. Center islands shall have a diameter of not less than seventeen (17) feet. unless otherwise approved through the review of the Planned Unit Development. 10. All roadways. exclusive of interior parking and access aisles areas; regardíess of ownership., shall be IOCat~d a minimum of ten (10) feet from any exterio.r building walls. except for security gate houses Dr similar security structures located in a private slreet Dr road right-of- way. 1 1. Any pedestrian circulation system and its related walkways shall be insulated' from the vehicular street system. This shall indude. when deemed to be necessary by the Board of County Commissioners, pedestrian underpasses or overpasses in th.e vicinity of playgrounds and other recreation areas, local shopping areas, and other neighborhood uses which ,generate a considerable amount of pedestrian traffic. 12. Access points on all collector Dr arterial streets serving a Planned Unit Development shall be located and spaced so that traffic moving into and out of the arterial streets donol cause traffic congestion. F. PARKING AND LOADING 1. General Provisions a. The number, type. and location of parking spaces shall be detennined at the time of final Planned Unit Development plan appròval. The determination of the number of spaces required shalt be based on Section 7.06.01 (F) of this COde. The number of parking spaces required by this section may be reduced based on substantial competent evidence that the reduced number of spaces is adequate for the proposed use or !hit parking may be shared by proximate uses that operate at different limes or on different days. - b. Reserved parking lpaces may be provided, in I¡euof paved spaces, subject to Section7.06.02(C) oflhis Code. r.~1J (August 1. 1190 3'11 ReviMd TIIrDugh DllD1JDO Sectlo~ 7.0' .00 Plannec Un,: Develo;¡menl 2. Off Street Parking and Loading Off-street parking and loading requirements are govemed by Sections 7.06.02 and 7,06.03 of this Code"and the following standards: a. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be designed to provide travelways between adjacent uses while discouraging through traffic. b. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be screened from adjacent roads and pedestrian wa1kways with hedges. dense planting, or changes in grades or walls. 3. On Street Parking In Planned Unit Developments. on street parking may be used so long as the road on which the on-street parking is proposed lies entirely within the limits of the defined Planned Unit Development and such parking would not cl.>ntravene any other provision of this Code or the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances. Where such on street parking and loading is used, it shall be consistent with the following design standards: a. The minimum size of a parkiflg stall shall be as follows: parallel angled . handicapped(parallel) håndicapped(angled) 8 feet X 23 feet 10 feet X 18 feet 12 feet X 23 feet 12 feet X 18 feet b'. Handicapped parking spac~sshall be appropria~ely marked. c. Access for emergency fire vehicles shall be in accordance with NFPA standards. d. No more than frheen (15) par1c.ing spaces' shall be permitted in a continuous row without being interrupted by a minimum landscape area of 360 square feet. G. LIGHTING All lighting facUities shall be arranged in such a manner so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or properties. ' H. LANDSCAPING'AND NATURAl FEATURES 1. Native trees and vegetation and other natural features shall be preserved to the extent practicable. .2. All sensitive environmental vegetation. trees and areas shall be preserved to the extent practicable. AIIDpIICI August 1. 1990 371 Revised ThrOUgh 08101100 Section 7.01. 00 Planned \,)nl: Development 3. Landscaping for off-street parking and loading areas shall meet the minimum requirements of Section 7.09.00. I.. OPEN SPACE STANDARDS 1. It. minimum of thirty-five (35) percent of the gross area of land to be committed to a Planned Unit Development must be for use as common open space, which may include. parks, recreation areas, bicycle and pedestrian paths and facilities. marinas. swimming beaches, commòn open space. common' landscaping and planting areas, or other areas of public purposes or use other than street, road or drainage rights-of-way, above ground utilities, excluding stormwater treatment facilities, and parking areas. It. minimum of 15 percentof any existing native upland habitat on the property; must be preserved in its natural condition as part of the required 35 percent common open space, For each acre of preserved native habitat above the required minimum 15 percent that is preserved in its original state. credit shall be given at a rate of 150 percent per acre towards the remaining common open space requirement. All areas to be dedicated for common open space shall be identified as part of the Preliminary Development Plan for the Planned Unit Development. Areas that are f}oodways. lakes. wetlands, and stonnwater retention areas may be applied to satisfy the total common open space requirement, subject to the requirement that 15"'0 of any existing native habitat on the property must be included as part of the required 35% common open space. As part of the Final Planned Unit Development submission process. the developer or petitioner for the Planned Unit Development shall provide for one of the following: a. The advance dedication of all common open space to a public. or acceptable private, . agency that will, upon acceptance. agree to maintain the common open space and any buildings. structures or improvements that have been placed on it. Aft such dedications Dr conveyances shall be completed prior to the issuance of any building pennits, inctuding land clearing. for any portion of the Planned Unit Development ;or, b. A phased conveyance of the land to a public or acceptable private agency that will. upon acceptance. agree to maintain the common open space 8r:-d any buildings. structures or improvements that have been placed on it.· The schedule for the phased conveyance of any such lands to be used for common open space shall be a SpecifIC condition of approval for the Planned Unit Develop~nt. 2. No parcel of land identified for use 8S a park or common open space shall be 'ess than one (1) contiguous acre. and all such .reas shall be physically part of the Planned Unit Devel- opment. 3. Areas provided or resèrved to meet any other environmental pre~ervation or protection requirements of this code or other lawful regulatory authority may be counted tDwardS the overall common open space requirement, provided that the common open space meets the ~"'I 1. 18110 * ReviMd Through 0lI01100 SectIon 7 .O~ ,DO Planne::! Unl: Developmen: requirements of this Code. J. SETBACKS FROM AGRICUL rURAL LAND Planned Unit Developments adjacent to land used for agricultural purposes, or designated for agricultural use on the Future Land Use Map of the 51. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. shall provide setbacks from the agricultural land sufficient to protect 'the function and operation of those , uses from the encroachment of Urban activities or uses. K.· PHASING 1. A Planned Unit Development may be developed in more than one stage or phase. 2. If a Final Development Site Plan approved by the Board óf County Commissioners is to be developed in stages or phases, each successive phase shall be constructed and developed in a reasonably continuous fashion. No more than two (2) yèars shall elapse betWeen the completion of any stage or phase, and the final stage or phase shall be completed within ten (10) years of the date of Final Development Site Plan. approval. Extensions of the above requirements are subject to approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Unless otherwise amended by the Board of County Commissioners through the Final Development Site Plan review process, the following sequence of development must be adhered to: a. One or more major recreation facilities and other major amenities; planned to serve the entire development, shall be completed or adequate security posted prior to the issuance of building or mobile home permits of more than forty (40)percent. or other percentage as determined by the Board to be appropriate based on circumstances that include the size oUhe project and the proposed phasing schedule, of the total number of authorized dwelling units. Recreation facilities or facilities and other amenities planned to serve one (1) phase of a multi-phased development shall be completed or appropriate security posted prior to issuance of building or mobile home permits or the recording of any final plat within that phase. b. No commercial facility shall be permined prior to the completion of at least forty (40) percent of the total number of authorized dweJlingunits; and. c. For Planned Unit Developments to be constructed in stages or phases, the net density of an individual stage or phase may vary from the approved Final Site Plan subject to the requirements in Section 11.02.05. f,llJ It' Aug&at ,. '890 311 ReYiMd Through DaI011DO Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations AA. HIRD HUTCHINSON ISLAND RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT ( 1 . Purpose The purpose of the Hutchinson Island Residential District (HIRD) is to provide a residential environment on North and South Hutchinson Island that is respectful of the natural resources and value of the barrier islands and can be supported by available public and private services. HIRD is intended to ensure that the intensity, location, and timing of new residential growth and development Is of a character that can be served by adequate public and private facilities, and that protects, preserves and enhances the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County. Hutchinson Island constitutes a unique and valuable public resource that plays a vital role in defining the County's economic and geographic character. HIRD is intended to facilitate growth and development of, the barrier islands while conserving the natural and human values the islands represent. Given the environmentally sensitive nature of barrier islands, HIRD is designed to ensure that growth and development is clustered away from environmentally sensitive lands and is limited to the more tolerant upland portions of Hutchinson Island. HIRD is also intended to implement and be consistent with the St. Lucie Coonty Comprehensive Plan. 2. Intent of Application a. It is the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that HIRD shall apply to all multi-family residential property in the unincorporated areas of North and South Hutchinson Island. b. No application for an amendment to this code, shall be accepted. which proposes to change the zoning classification of any land on North or South Hutchinson Island to a classification other than to: Hutchinson Island Residential District (HIRD); Planned Unit Development (PUD); Planned Non-Residential Development (PNRD); Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD); Utilities (U); Institutional (I); Religious Facilities (RF); any Residential, Estate (RE-1 or RE-2) or any Residential, Single Family (RS-2, RS-3, RS-4) zoning district. Any residential development on North or South Hutchinson Island must be consistent with Paragraphs 4, 5, 6,7,8 and 9 of this Section. ( 3. . Subdistricts For the purposes of this District, lands located on North and South Hutchinson Island are hereby classified into the following subdistricts: a. North Hutchinson Island Residential District (NHIRD), which includes those lands located on North Hutchinson Island in St. Lucie County; b. South Hutchinson Island Residential District, North (SHIRD-N), which includes those lands located on South Hutchinson Island between the Florida Power & Light Company nuclear power plant and the city limits of the City of Fort Pierce; and L c. South Hutchinson Island Residential District, South (SHIRD-S), which includes those lands located on South Hutchinson Island between the Florida Power & Light Company nuclear power plant and Martin County. ' Adopted August 1, 1990 137 Revised Through 08101/00 Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations ( 4. Environmental Zones For the purposes of this District, all lands located on North and South Hutchinson Island are dassified into one of the following environmental zones based on their geologic, hydrologic, topographic, and biologic character: a. Dune Preservation Zone, which includes those lands lying between the mean high water line to the east and the western edge of the primary dune system, as defined by vegetation and elevation. The Dune Preservation Zone shall have the characteristics of the Beach and Dunelands environmental zone as described in Chapter VIII, Natural Environmental Analysis, of the St. Lucie County Barrier Island Study: Analysis of Growth Management Policy Plan (August, 1982). Where the westem edge of the primary dune system cannot be ascertained, the Dune Preservation Zone shall beset by reference to a management! restoration· plan that has been prepared based on natural coastal dynamics. b. Uplands, which include those lands lying west of the westem edge of the primary dune system and which are not classified as wetlands as defined in paragraph (c) of this subsection. c. Wetlands, which include those lands lying west ,of the western edge of the primary dune system that are above the elevation of mean high water and are included in the landward extent of waters of the state as defined in Rule 17-4.02(17), Florida Administrative Code, on the date of adoption of this Code. 5. ," Permitted U.ses The following uses shall be permitted as of right in environmental zones in the Hutchinson Island Residential District: a. Dune Preservation Zone: (1) Residential densities that can be clustered to Uplands located on the parcel proposed for development. ' (2) Elevated walkways. (3) Recreational uses not involving structures other than elevated walkways. b. Uplands: (1) Detached single family dwelling units. (2) Two and three family dwelling units. (3) Multiple family dwelling units. (4) Parks. (5) Accessory uses, subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00. .. c. Wetlands: (1) Residential densities that can be clustered to Uplands located on the parcel proposed for development. (2) Elevated walkways. (3) Bridges and bridge approaches. Adopted August 1, 1990 138 Revised Through 08101/00 Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations (4) For that portion filled in accord with permits received from federal and state agencies exercising jurisdiction over such area, any permitted Uplands use. (', 6. Conditional Uses a. Dune Preservation Zone: (1) None. b. Uplands: (1) Hotel, motel, resort, rooming and boarding houses, tourist court, and time-share or transient lodging facilities with rooms or dwelling units used for occupancies of less than four weeks, provided that the number of rooms does not' exceed the residential densities setforth in subsection 7" òf this Section. (999) (2) Athletic and entertainment clubs or facilities, provided that the proposed use will not generate traffic in excess of' that projected for the parcel if developed at the maximum permitted residential density. (999) (3) Bed and Breakfast Residences, subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.20. (4) Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999) c. Wetlands: ( (1) Marinas and boat launching facilities, prövided that the area of wetland altered does not exceed five (5%) percent of the wetlands located on the parcel proposed for development; (2) Utility transmission faC?ilities; (3) For that portion filled in accord with permits received from Federal and State agencies exercising jurisdiction over such area, any conditional upland use. 7. Residential Densities a. Maximum Residential Densities Except as provided in paragraphs band c of this subsection, no structure shall be constructed, built, moved, remodeled, occupied, or used as a residential use at a density greater than the applicable maximum residential density set f~rth in 'this paragraph. MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES (Expressed as percentage of maximum density set forth in the future land use dèsignation of the Sl Lucie County Comprehensive Plan) NHIRD SHIRD . N SHIRD . S commencement level 15% 18% 9% AdopIed August 1, 1990 139 Revised Through 08101100 Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations ( NHIRD SHIRD - N SHIRD - S level 1 36% 28% 45% level 2 54% 100% 100% level 3 100% does not apply does not apply When the maximum percentage indicated in the table above would yield less than one (1) unit per acre, a maximum density of one (1)'unit per acre shall apply except for the RlC (Residential Conservation) future land use designation. Properties within the RlC future land use designation shall have their density computation based upon .2 dulac for all lands above ' mean high water. b. Existing Uses Any structure, project or use that exceeds the applicable maximum residential density set forth in paragraph (a) ofthis subsection or the maximum building height set forth in paragraph 11 (b )(2) of this section, shall not be subject to the provisions ot this subsection but shall, be considered a pre-existing use and be subject to the provisions of Section 11.07.05{G) if and only if: (1) The structure, project, or use has been occupied or constructed, or has received a building permit, site plan, or other County development approval prior to July 12; 1984: and (2) Development of the structure, project, or use is completed within all applicable approval periods and time limits. No change or alteration ota pre-existing use as defined in this paragraph shall be permitted if the change or alteration would allow a residential density exceeding that set forth in the building permit, site plan, or other County development approval for such existing pre- existing use. c. Payment otAlternate Development Fee. A site plan for a structure may be approved at a density greater than the applicable maximum set forth in paragraph a of this subsection upon the condition that the developer pay to the Board of County Commissioners the applicable alternate development fee set forth in this paragraph. In addition, if the proposed development, together with existing and previously approved development, will necessitate any roadway, bridge, or other improvement to maintain Level of Service C annually or D during peak season, or will require any traffic control device or access improvement, U'te site plan shall not be approved except upon the condition that building permits not be issued until after such improvement or traffic control device is installed or until the developer has executed a contract for construction of needed improvements and has provided security in a form and amount acceptable to the County Attorney. The alternate development fee shall be payable at issuance of building permits and for each unit exceeding the maximum set forth in paragraph (a) of this subsection. AdaptId AuguM 1, 1990 140 Revised Through 08101/00 Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations ALTERNATE DEVELOPMENT FEES (amount per residential unit exceeding the maximum permitted at NHIRD SHIRD - N SHIRD - S $2,336 $4,604 $ 13,697 ( Each alternate development fee represents an amount equal to the estimated cost per residential ùnit to provide the transportatìon improvements specified in subsection 8 of this Section. All altemate development fees collected pursuant to this paragraph shall be received and expended solely for the transportation improvements, or equivalent, specified in subsection 8 of this Section. Nothing in the paragraph shall permit a structure to be constructed, built, moved, remodeled, occupied, or used as a residential use at a density exceeding the maximum set forth in Level 4 for the NHIRDsubdistrict or in Level 3 for the SHIRD-N and SHIRD-5 subdistricts. d. Increase in Maximum Residential Densitìes If, at any time after a residential use is approved under paragraph a of this subsection, the capacity of the roadway system in a subdistrict 'increases to the extent that maximum residential densities increase from' the Commencement Level to Level 2, from Level 2 to Level 3, or from Level 3 to Level 4, a developer may submit a development application for ( the subject property for additional densitY as long as the development proposed in the . ap~lication, when considered, with the initially approved development, meets the requirements of this section and all other provisions of this Code. e. Credit for Payment of Roads Impact Fee Any roads impact fee paid pursuant to Section 1-17-30 of the Code of Ordinances of 51. Lucie County, shall be credited against the applicable altemate development fee as set forth in Section 3.01.03.AA(7)(c) of this Code. 8. Traffic Capacity Levels For the purposes of this Code, the following levels of service or equivalent capacity, as determined to be acceptable by the Board of County Commissioners, shall govern the density of development according to. subsection 7 of this Section. A traffic capacity level shall be deemed available when the Board of County Commissioners or other appropriate authority has accepted a construction bid for the stated improvement. ' . a. Commencement Level .. (1) Existing conditions. b. Level 2 (1) NHIRD - Existing conditions as of October 12, 1983, together with the addition of Adopted August 1, 1990 141 Revised Through 08101/00 Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations ('.: " 11.:.', northbound right turn lane at Old Dixie Highway and the North Beach Causeway and signalization improvements at that intersection, and the addition of a southbound right turn lane at State Road A 1 A and Atlantic Beach Boulevard. (2) SHIRD-N - Existing conditions tOgether with the improvement of Seaway Drive to a four lane road from the South Beé;1ch Causeway Bridge to Binney Drive, the addition of a northbound left turn lane at the intersection of Ocean Drive and Binney, and the improvement of Ocean Drive in the City of Fort Pierce to a three làne road. (3) SHIRD-S - Existing conditions together with the improvement of either: (a) the Jensen Beach Causeway to a four lane facility, together with improvement of Indian River Drive to a four lane road between the Jensen Causeway and Jensen Beach Boulevard, the improvement of State Road A 1 A to a four lane roadway from the Jensen Beach Causeway to a point - one mile north ofth'eS1. Lucie'- Martin Coúnty line, and the improvement of Jensen Beach Boulevard to U.S. 1 to four lanes; (b) the Stuart Bridge to a four lane facility, together with the fourlaning of the Ocean Boulevard Causeway from Indian River Plantation west through the intersection of Monterey Road, and the four laning of State Road A1A from , tlÍe Jensen Beach Causeway to a point one mile north of the S1. Lucie County - Martin County line; or (c) the construction of a two lane bridge to South Hutchinson Island at the Walton Road corridor. together with improvements of Walton' Road to four lanes west of the Savannahs to U.S. 1. c. Level 3 (5) NHIRD - Level 2 Improvements plus expansion of the North Beach Causeway to four lanes from north of Atlantic Beach Boulevard to U.S. 1, and the addition of a north bound right turn lane at U.S. 1 and Seaway Drive. - (6) SHIRD-N - Level 2 improvements plus the four laning of Seaway Drive from Binney Drive to Ocean Drive or an equivalent improvement, i~provement of Ocean Drive within the City of Fort Pierce to a four lane road, and the addition of a northbound right turn lane at the intersection of U.S. 1 and Seaway. (7) SHIRD-S - Existing conditions together with two ofthe improvements specified under Level 2 above. d. Level 4 " (1) NHIRD - Level 3 improvements plus grade separation of the North Beach Causeway and the Florida East Coast Railway tracks, an interchange at'Seaway Drive and U.S. 1, or other improvements that will provide at least Level of Service D conditions during the peak season at the Seaway Drive and U.S. 1 intersection, and the four laning of State Road A1A from north of Atlantic Beach Boulevard to the Indian River County line. AdopIIId Augusl1, 1990 142 Revised Through 08101/00 Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations ( (2) SHIRD-N - Does not apply. (3) SHIRD-S - Does not apply. 9. Environmentally Sensitive Areas The residential densities permitted in the Dune Preservation Zone and in the wetlands mày be used only if clustered to uplands located on the parcel proposed for development, or if clustered to that portion of the wetlands filled in accord with permits received from federal or state agencies exercising jurisdiction over such area. 10. Lot Size Requirements a. Single Family Development: Lot size requirements for detached single-family dwelling units shall be in accordance with the lot size requirements for the RS-4 District found in Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. b. Multi-Family Development: Lot size requirements for multiple-family dwelling units and two- and three-family dwelling units shall be in accordance with the lot size requirements for the RM-11 District found in Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. ( 11. Dimensional/Building Height Requirements a. Single Family Development: Dimensional requirements for detached single-family residential unIts shall be in accordance with the dimensional requirements for the RS-4 District found in Table 7.10 in Section 7.04.00, with the exception of residential densities that are outlined in this section and the requirements of Section 4.01.00, Hutchinson Island- Building Height Overlay Zone. b. Multi-Family Development: Dimensional requirements for all multiple-family dwelling units and two- and three-family dwelling units shall be in accordance with the dimensional requirements for the RM-11 District found in Table 7.10 in Section 7.04.00, except as follows: (1) Residential densities shall be as set forth in subsection 7 of this Section. (2) For any structure that has not been occupied constructed, or has not received a building permit, site plan or othØ{ County development approval prior to January 10, 1995 the requirements of Section 4.01.00, Hutchinson Island - Building Height Overlay Zone shall apply. 12. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements Off-street parking and loading requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.06.00. Adopted August 1, 1990 143 Revised Through 08101/00 Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations I: 13. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.09.00. 14. Nonconforming Lots of Record Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the provisions of Section 10.00.04 shall govern the erection of a single-family dwelling and customary accessory buildings on any single lot of record existing on the effective date of this Code. 15. Additions to Recreational Vehicles, Mobile Homes, and Travel Trailers a. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, any mobile home, recreational vehicle, or travel trailer park space located in this district shall be considered an existing conditional use under Section 11.07.05(G) if and only if: (1 ) the mobile home has been erected and occupied, or the recreational vehicle or travel trailer park space constructed and used, prior to the effective date of this Code; and (2) the mobile home, recreational vehicle, or travel trailer park space was a fully conforming use on the effective date of this Code. b. No addition to an existing mobile home shall be permitted unless the addition meets all requirements of the RMH-5 District. c. No Recreational Vehicle, Travel Trailer, Detached Single Family Residence, Class A Mobile Home or addition thereto shall be permitted unless the Recreational Vehicle, Travel Trailer, Detached Single Family Residence, Class A Mobile Home or addition thereto meets all applicable requirements of Section 7.1 0.16 (RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS) in existing recreational vehicle parks. or Section 7.10:17 (MOBILE HOME PARKS) in existing mobile home parks. d. An addition in existence as of April 18, 1989. (Ordinance 89-09) which does not meet the requirement established in this Section shall be deemed a nonconforming structure and shall be subject to the provisions of Section 10.00.03. However. existing additions which pose a threat of imminent danger to the health, safety, or welfare of the general public as determined by the Fire Marshal pursuant to the Standard for Fire Safety Criteria for Mobite Home Installations. Sites, and Communities, NFPA 501 A-1982. as applicable. must be brought into compliance or removed. The decision of the Fire Marshal may be appealed to the Board of Construction and Appeal. 16. Sea Turtle Protection Sea turtle protection requirements shall be in ac+ordance with Section 6.04.02. Adopted August 1, 1990 144 Revised Through 08101/00 Ae:enda Item 9: Tailors' Cove Development LLC PUD-05-009/RZ-05-010: Hank Flores stated that this is the application of Tailors' Cove Development for a change in zoning from the Hutchinson Island Residential District Zoning District to the Planned Unit Development Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known as Tailors' Cove. The property is located on the west side of South A.I.A., directly across from the Atlantis Condominiums. The applicant is proposing a residential development of twenty-four multi-family units in eleven buildings. The proposed planned development maintains e west 10.39 acres in conservation. The proposed project also indicates an access.,. . ough the wetland area and a proposed eleven slip boat dock. A beach acces!,'~fi:Y ment has been provided on the east side of South A.l.A., and on the south . .e Claridge-by-the-Sea Condominium. .é1~~~~~0}r~~~ Staff has determined that the petition meets staI,).4áfds of review as se Development Code and is not in conflis!~~j:t.h the '\0£Omprehensi recommends that this petition be forwarded to th~~ª~d,jgf;Ç(eunty Com a recommendation of approval, subject to eight limiti'· c Ì1ditions. in the Land Staff . ioners with Chairman Grande opened the publifp" ion of the hè ~~~~1~:. ~'\tF~~ '" Mr. Dennis Murphy stated that the ptl;)pose:;".\ J is qpftsistent with the existing developments· that surround it, and that t1í~y .~.' rè'g' a PUD because it is for the purpose of the propo§~d: .9~Y'sintend~tuse. Heè ated that they plan to sell the community in a fee.~!~ple fot'Qi~t and subdiv~~e the property. He added that this can not be done under thecUÌ1\~ HI' ',," ning distric,1 '~';)':$;: .tl,1at th "j;" '. :JfŠ of approximately 14.39 acres and has two separate '~~;:~lIoW~~}O five wlits per acre and ·RC-allows the development densi f 0.2 units pei\~e). H¢-~ç.ied that they have 11.21 acres of land that is above meafi;:~yvater. He stá::' 7.98 ~tès of that are in RU designation and 3.23 acres is in the RC des'ì'~~tion. He stated maj()f1,f~à~of t~",3i its are two-unit buildings, but they have two three-unit buildings. He start:! ·····f"they are servicing these units with a central parking court. He stated that this will b., one in a paver brick or paver stone. He stated that the community will consist of individually owned units. He stated that they are seeking the approval from the State of Florida for the construction of eleven boat docks, which will be located in the southwest portion of the project on the Indian River. Mr. Murphy they will be conforming to all applicable St. Lucie County standards, in regards to the drainage issues, and to all of South Florida Water Management District and DEP discharge criteria. He stated that the proposed project will be accepting run-off 12-08-2005 P&Z 25 from A.1.A., and running it through their treatment systems before it is discharged into the Lagoon. Mr. Murphy stated as a part of their project, they will be constructing a new habitat transition area between uplands and wetlands along the western edge. Water servjce will be provided py the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority, sewer service will be provided by St. Lucie County, and the development will be taking reused water back for irrigation purposes as required. They have met with the Fire District, as well as the School Board, and the Department of Transportation and have worked out all of the main concerns. ¡t''-<; responsible for the He stated that the additionaltwenty-four units that they are affect the evacuation system on Hutchinson Island. T4~' report. They do not have .any dune preservation of theirptqperty. ", Chairman Grande asked if there were questiQ Ms. Hammer stated that· there is a new sólar suggests that the applicant takes a look into this this system into this project as state 0' the art design. Mr. Murphy stated that they will take ~:H Mr. Mundt asked if the Home maintenance in the pre§eiWl;~' ~~,<ti{~;~ Mr. Murphy statedY~$'d\ about the: > . ~'1;¡~.[~,~~~~'ì;~.):' Mr. ..~~., Bemedes, 'ón~'~~t the\.~~Hrrs of the project, stated that they have made an agreemeü 'th the COun~Yi.:to purç)iãse two mitigation credits from the Be~ Point and that they'" . ..made the aÌ>lr9priatè deposits and purchase agreements with the County. . ~~i' Mr. Hearn asked~' 'IV muç~rdo the mitigation credits cost. ,,~:},,' ",é~;: . ,j.~;v:f~W Mr. Bemedes stated ~pþroximately $100,000 each. Mr. Lounds stated if the ditch collapsed then the water would escape and decrease the stagnation which creates the whole area. He asked Mr. Murphy if this was part of their plan or development, for the ditch to collapse. Mr. Murphy stated as you move to the western part of the development that is a factual statement. He stated that they are not sure how the ditch was created and knocking it down will not help the flow matters. 12-08-2005 P&Z 26 Chairman Grande stated that the property located south of the proposed project has a dock which curves to the north. He added that the applicant's dock goes southward. He asked if the docks collided or meets at any point. Mr. Murphy stated that they have looked into and do not intend to promote boat crashing. He stated to the best of their knowledge, they are not conflicting with the dock on the south side to their property. Chairman Grande stated if the proposed project was a HIRD property, they would be responsible for the alternate impact fees on South Hutchinson Is d Residential District South. /~:, > :': He added that the alternate impact fees are more~;~pèñ~ivè than tfi \";':~£I11al road impact fees. He asked if the applicant will be exemptm the HIRD's altern.at{' impact fees if . they develop under PUD. Ms. Young agreed. Chairman Grande stated as a HIRD P~2 impact fees than they would for any otfì~r pro , ,,«\ zoning from HIRD to PUD is the applican iÍld be paying more ón e ask~ if they grant a change in ttrnate impact fee. Chairm~:.i ran , , .ê;'1>f\ , e HIRD designation was created, all of the residential prop~rn~~ in the HIRDj.ª~§ignatJi»'Fe to stay under the HIRD designation. He stated .,^ "\';' ,," "',"} """G\" if thê'(jq~~t approves tlì~¡[,pplic~t's request for a change to PUD which will allow for them to dó:!,~~wple fee sell~¡~d get away from setbacks, then the County may be giving up approxinÏàtØ}y $1 OO,Oqlè of impact fees that they would get if this request is not ".":'\:>~":y.;~" ,.'ij,./% granted or appr(jYe,f~';;~ " 3·;f!i'(. . Mr. Bernedes state, at they are not trying to cjrcumvent that regulation. He stated in their planning they'\Vere assuming that using the one credit per acre will give them a certain amount of credits and then they would pay an incremental of the $13,000. Mr. Flores stated that in the past the County has enforced the alternate development fee for PUD on Hutchinson's Island. Chairman Grande opened the public hearing. 12-08-2005 P&Z 27 Ms. Young announced that staff has received two letters from surrounding residents expressing their concerns about the proposed project. One of the letters is from Ms. Steiner, an owner of Atlantis Condominium who stated that the proposed project needs to include a swimming pool so that the residents do not use their swimming pool. The other letter is from the president of the Board of Directors from Claridge by the Sea, indicating their concern about increased density, the impact on traffic, as well as safety for the incoming residents of Tailors' Cove, in regards to the crossing the street to access the beach. Chairman Grande closed the public hearing. Mr. Knapp stated, "After considering the testimonXiþfè~~ ed durin including staff comments and the standards of ~~¥ìèw as set forth in tn of the St. Lucie County Land Development Q,;:;' .here move that ing and Zoning Commission recommend that thè, uc ',punty Boar, of County Commissioners grant approval to the application or~'··r' s Côve Develop~ent LLC for ·<:;\r~'·:<'''ç., a change in zoning from the HIRQ,~,~Hutchinson Isl.~"ÌJ::Residential District) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit D~~~l~~ment- Tailo(;:pve) Zoning District." He stated that this looks like a very nice proje6fa~ beach. Mr. Grande voted för the motion. He stated that he intended on voting against this item, but since Mr. Lounds is voting for construction on the island, he will give into Mr. Lounds favor on the project. Chainnan Grande stated that this application will be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a unanimous recommendation for approval. 12-08-2005 P&Z 28 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS z~.~ ~î=:··.'·"'l!eJ"'e'~rr.' ~"""""';""'" COUNTY., FLORIDA GROWTH MANAGEMENT April 28, 2006 In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that Tailers' Cove Development, LLC has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Tailers' Cove) Zoning District arid Preliminary and Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the following described property: Location: West side of South SR A-I-A, directly across from Atlantis I Condominiums. THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST, The second public hearing on the petition will be held at 6:00 P.M., or as ~oon thereafter as possible, on May 16,2006, County Commissioner's Chambers, SL Lucie County Administration Building Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida; All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will aiso be considered. The County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing. County policy strongly encourages your input and comment at public hearing of this matter before the Planning and Zoning Commission and County Commission, rather than 1)y contact outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). We encourage you to speak at these public hearings, or provide written comments for the record. The proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners' are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony' and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross- examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462- 1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-describedparcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. Please call (772) 462-2822 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number: PUD 05-009. Sincerely, , ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Doug Coward, Chairman JOSEPH E, SMITH, Disrricr No, 1 . DOUG COWARD. Districr No, 2 . PAULA A, LEWIS, Disrricr No. J · FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, Districr No, 4 . CHRIS CRAFT, Disrricr No, 5 Counry Administrotor - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Administration: (772) 462-1590 . Planning: (772) 462-2822 · GISrrechnical Services: (772) 462-1553 Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 · Fax: (772) 462-1581 Tourist Development: (772) 462-1529 · Fax: (772) 462-2132 www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us "ti (I $ II> .S "0 ) II> ::> e: ) ) .0 ) > . (I"g¡ .s::.o ~(I )= - (I .0> J!! (I ïii e: > ) (I.s:: ) 3 à3 ~ ~ ~ -Q) II> .... Q)"O U') -"0 II> (I f!!"O "0$ "0 (.) (I Q) II> t:: ,ª8 an en >. g ."5. ~II>Q. .~ Q) ::> iii ~ II> g::f!!~ CjlGI:g"O anJ:l(le: oEQ)(I 041-"0 ::::I~!Q) Q,ZEË 0IIJ!!8.a ~ .a .S .S CjI....Q)¡j an,GI,>CI) o.!!~.c Nl!'Ccn a: r:L e ~ ~~.s ~ O~_II>¡¡: ~GIº~ I!! r:L__.... ,!!.e ê 5:' - Q, (I'- ~EC.~ "OQ)Q. ,g.t:~« ~~~~ ='C"8. O!$o ~a~à: N NN N-'<tm-I') .....-1')-- I') oeo I/) N'<t ;n 'r"co co eo .....1/) 'r" '<to <9 ~ ~co I/) 'r" N N 'r" N 'r" N M ~ or--:. N.n cb..... cb..... I') 'N '<t N'r" C5 N ..... 00 0 ..... ~I?; .....0 Nm ..... '<t ~ N'I') ..... co 00 I/) eo 1/)1') eo I/) ~ co I/) 1/)1/) ml/) 000 I')N ml/) I')'r" I/) Cõ :ßf- I/) Q, m m m 0 m'r" ~ 0 m I/) m Nm mm mm 01') 01') ()m 01') m m m IÑ '<t ~ ~ I') ~~ eo '<t 0 ;:!; ~~ ~;:!; ~~ N~ 001') ~'<t eoI') ~ eo :!: meo ~ I') I') I') N I') I') .... '<tl') I') '<tl') '<t N~ 41 > Š ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~o :::!~ ~~ ~z ~~ ~ U ~ en LL LL LL LL LLLL LL LL LL Z LL LLLL LL LL LL:!: LLLL LL _ LLLL en LL II> e: Q) .s:: 'E (I (.) 'fi ø 'fi 'fi'fi 'fi .s:: .s:: z"§ 'fi (I 'fi Q) Q) .!!:! 'fi .s:: 1ñ ~ (.) (.) 'õ (II a¡ (II (I (.) (II t (I (I ê (I (II (II "OZ ~Æ ê Q) (.) (I Q) Æ Q) Æ .::- Q) f!! Q) - Q) e: 0 ::> ° ::> Q) Q) a¡ (I a¡ a¡ f- a¡ =a¡ Q) ~ a¡ e: ~a¡ a¡ e: Q) Q) Ü 0 c -Ec a¡ Q) c 0 Q) c a¡ c (I I: I: I: LL I: cãi ëii ã.1: ä: ëi5 I: ~ éi5 .- (II ª Q) Q) I: Q) Q) ä: 5: II> .9 .91:: 5: Ë Q) Q) .s:: '5 E 5: Q) 1:: ~ Ìii II> E II> (I II> II> E Q) Ìii II> (II "0 II> :; ~ :; B 1:: 1:: II> E 'Gj I: ~ I: '5 I: I: 1:: I: ~ e: Q) ::> ::> I: I!! I: e: 'S; ~ 0 ëii > I: (II 0 Q) (I 0 0 Q) 0 o .- ~ ) Q) .s Q) Q) Q) if t3 ~ëi5 ~U (I Q) :!: a¡~ LL Cl. -. Cl. Cl.:!: if -. 0:: -. -. -. LL Cl. -. J: ~-. en 0:: 0 ~ en .s:: ã: 0 0 en z 0 ; 1:: Q) N ....00 ..... t: 00 .... iii 0 ëii eo 01') Z en {E. - ) - z ~ ã. 0 I:N .- .- ... « N I: $ ..... fig I') I: ._ C I: "C J: ) Q) ::J 'II: ~ ::J Cl. ::J Cl. Q) "0 'II: Q);t:: 'II: 'II: e: (II ....0:: > .... ::> C "0 .... C C .... .... e: Ü I: C Cl. .... o Q) C C t: øen ~ C 0:: C 'S; 0 '~ ~ 8 C ãj §! C "0 "0 Q) ~ Q) (I 0 f!! ~ ãi I: f- ~ §! I: I: e: e: e: I: I: I: ~ (II :õ I: I: e: I: « () ~ (I ~ () (I (I (I (I ø '2 I: (II 0 (I (II :2 E (I, (I .s:: ~ ~ > (If ~ ~ ~ ~ "0 ~ () (I ::> ~ 3 :>2 ~ e: ~ (I iii ~ ,g¡~ (I ~ 'C 0 ~ ø C ê5 I!! (If (I a¡ CI Q) 'E 'õ 11 1\1 .9 '2 'E :>ãi 0 ! .s:: C 0 C 0 0 e: e C 0 0 } ~ 0 :g 0 'r" ~ ~ I: 0 .::> ~ 0 (I C ::! 0 E CI Q) III « UJ UJiS en Iii () 1\1 en en (/) en ~ C ø 'õ UJ (/) 1\1 en 1\1 .S I: (/) III UJ en 1\1 8 LL t!! en LL (/) 0 Cl. Z ~ ~ J: ]? ~ 0 I!! :> z N z en 'C Cl. N N N N N N eo :!: m N N ~ 0 0 0 0 I/) a¡ 0 ..... 0 (!) ..... 0 ..... ..... ..... ~ ..... N 0 eo I/) ..... 'r" 'r" ..... '<t '<t 0 " 0 'r" 'r" eo N'r" 0 0 0 0 «i 0 0 0 0 ;;; 00 m N co 0 '<t I/) 0 N m '<t N ~ I') ..... 0 eo '<to ;;; ~ 0 ~ () 0 0 ,0 0 "<t 0 a; ..... '<t 'r" 0 0 I') 0 I') N Cõ m 0 N I') 'r" I') 'r" CIG 'r" ..... 'r" '<t 'r" 'r" 'r" N .... 'r" 'r" N 'r" 'r" 'r" ..... 'r" 'r" N N 'r" 41 E ftI I: LL cb ~ c;::! Q) II> 41 ~« c ~"O ~ ._ e: g ~ 0 . - 'U ~a¡ 41 ~ ~ E f- .- , ftI "0 C C6~ ~ 15 a¡ c;::! c.!!! 41 "O"E c ~ C (I 1\1; en« 41 E ftI C LL ãi .... .. 1\1 è{í 41 ~ . II> 'Gj C 0 II> .~ .c -i5 ~ ~ () Q) .S II> I: :¡¡: "E ~ ëi 0 f- "E CI f!! (I ) ::> r- ~ "0 CI b õ '8 Q) - - II> - - J: (I ~ I: tII :!: .9 C ëi m ::> (I « :; 0 C Ü , .c ø :!: 1\1 0 en :!: g 1\1 Cl. 1\1 0 E z ~ 1\1 tII Ü ~ > ~ C ~ :!: a¡ Z .S E ::> Cl. tII ~ (I I: c::: ~ Q) « '~ "E f- e: () tII I: (I 1ñ UJ 0 C (II 'C (.) 'fi ~ - .s:: '1: E :!: 1\1 1\1 U I: Q) f!! 1:: ~ .s:: ãi "0 Q) 'Ë "g¡ 1\1 .s .s:: 1\1 I!! 'C E :!: 1\1 1\1 1\1 Ü 1\1 1\1 E 0 le- I: e- w en E!' :!: f- .8 'C 0 Ü Q. tII I!! ~ i2' i2' 1\1 e tII :!: 1\1 Q) 0 ü ~ 0 0 1\1 !.~ Q) .... :!: 1\1 (.) W I: Cl. C > Ü Ü ãi "0 co -. 0 'E -. ëii "0 t:. t:. :!: C "0 'S; 'Gj Q) -i5 Q) 1\1 .- g .g~ .S I: C tII tII « > $ ëi ~ Q) 1\1 ài en J!! f!! ~ I: 0 ~ .0 E ëi ~ I: en'E 41 ~ tII ¡~ tII ) II> « ~ "E ~ .... 0 ~ tII (I C ~ :; tII Q) e ) - 8 .c a¡ ::> ãi -. tII (I tII ~ g I!! ::! 1\1 o co E E E 0 .g .g Q) i.~ II> tII 1\1 I: .s:: - I: ;s E :!: (I .c tII 1\1 "0 1\1 tII J: :§ (!) Q. ~ tII <d I~ en ) $ Q) Cl. .0 0 Q. ª e ftI ::> 0 0 §! :2 E en (.) 2 z I: ::! « Cl. - $ c: c: ~ ~ ø ::> :¡¡: en UJ 0 I: C 8 J: 'S .... J: I!! 8 8 {¡ :!: Q) « (I 0 LL ~ J: "ë1 ð~ ...I a¡ $ 8 ::: ~ ~ I! en :!: 0 ~ :!: 0 b 0 c::: :!: c::: 1\1 en g g Q) .... II> ... Q) ~ II> Ü I: > 0 'r" Q) (I I: ,!;¡ ~ :2 (II (.) I~ :!: ø :!: I,ª (I ... Q) C E :!: 3 I\I::E .. 'õ ãi .!!! ~ ãi I!! .!!¡ 3 .u .!!¡ 3: II> .... .... 'ª 'I: -. :2 0 I: 1:: Ìii .s:: §! LL f!! ~~ 41 ::> "0 "E "0 c: ~ c: "0 ) ::> ::> I!! "0 I: I: I: Q) !:! ::: "0 Q) ~ Q. ~ I: 0 C Q) "g¡ 0 'fij -ê .s:: € ::! 0 .S "0 ~ "0 ~ ~ ,g¡ (I ,g¡ 'co co ~ co 1/1 'E 1:: 8 ::> f!! Q) 1\1 .s:: .s:: II> (I (I 1\1 ~ $ $ ;: 1\1 "0 I: ::> ïii Q) 0 0 0 I: I: ëi5 :i ~ 0 ~ q: Q) ù5 .g « « « C ø :!: :!: Õ c::: (/) en :¡¡: < « «« 0 :> ãj :> f- z CI) LL -. -. -. -. 8 m q¡> m .,. N N ..... It) I/) 00 00 0 eo 0 '? ''? ~9 N I') m 1/)0 := 'r" 'r" 00 00 I/) N I/) 00 ~ I/) 00 'r"'<t 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 6 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 1/1 6 6 0 ÓÒ 0 CI) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 .g 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 9 0 CjI 9 0 0 0 0 9 0 9 9 9 0 0 0' 99 0 9 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 00 41 cb N .;.. .b 0 M , N åJ åJ ~ 8 ~ åJ ~có 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 ß ..... .... '<t "<t I') 0 0 eo mm ;n 0 0 m 'r" 0 00 0 .... 0 0 g§ 'r" 0 'r" 0 .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N 0 0 0 0 O'r" C5 '<t I/)'r" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 00 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 9 9 9 9 CjI 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 99 == 0 0 0 00 e 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 ¡ I/) I/) I/) Il) an It) I/) I/) I/) I/) I/) Il) Il) I/) Il) I/) I/) I/) I/)Il) åJ åJ åJ rhtb 'r" 'r" 'r" 'r" 'r" 'r" 00 .... N I') '<tl/) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 .1/1 ~ ~ ~ ... .... "i ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ;n .... 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 co II\' 00 II\' 00 00 co 00 00 00 00 00 00 co 00 0000 i u{u? 00 00 00 00 00 .., 00 00 co co- ~ N N N ~ N N N N N N N N N N N N NN u N N N N N N 'r" N N N N .N I: N N .... .... 'r" .... .... .. 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;n 0 0 0 0 o~ .!! 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 ~ ;n ;n ;n ~~ ftI Il) I/) I/) I/) I/) I/) an I/) I/) I/) ~« Il) I/) Il) Il) an I/) I/) I/) Il) I/) I/) Il) I/) Il) I/) I/) I/) I/) I/)Il) Q, '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t .... '<t '<t '<t U '<t '<t '<t "<t .... '<t '<t '<t "<t "<t '<t '<t '<t "<t '<t '<t "<t "<t '<t'<t 'C "<t "<t "<t '<t'<t 1:Ï cu ~ I/) .5 '0 Q) I/) :;) e: Q) Q) .0 Q) > . cu.!!! .c:.o _cu Q)= - cu .0 > l!! cu ïii e: > Q) cu.c: Q) ~ OJ ~ j g¡ ~Q) I/) .. Q)'O 1/)'0 I/) cu e'O '0 Q) 'Oõ cu Q) '" I:: 'ª 8 I/) CI) >- Q - Q . Q. NI/)Q. Q) :;) IIi'~CI) g:ej Cj)CÞ:g'O 1/).0 CUe: Q E Q) CU OCÞ-'O ;:,ï;.!!!Q) 11. z ~ E G/I.198.E Q'III e: .5 .... " .- Cj)..~æ I/) CÞ cu Q) Q .!!! .c:.o NI!"I/) a:Q.I!!~ ~t.5f! o ~_I/) Ii: ~CÞQ~ f Q. - -.. CÞ e f! Q) = a. ìõ .!! {2EQ.[ ~e5!Q. """~o<C "''O.c: ~ :!!!.!~ ¡ ocþQ)Q. Q.::IõE? ca::oza.. ~=~-~~--~'<t~'<t~~.... '<t-....--o'<t--~~'<t ~-N O~~~ ~ ~ 0 .... 0 '<t~ ~~~~ ~ N re:¡:~~ ~~~ æ ....'<t~ ~~~:¡:~~~ ~ ~ .('1')11 .a:. I "twC? ~~(!)('I')~~~ NO) 8>~;~~~~""~Q'<t~~~N~~~~MM~~~>~~~~N~~~~~M N>~'<tMO~~~~'<t~o~~M~~m~~~C!i~x>~~~~~'<t~~~~g I1.N~'<t~~~~'<t~'<to~~~~O~~~M~""~'<t ~'<t '<t~'<t~~~ O~ -~~M~~~~M~Mg~O;$;~~~O~'<t~~'<tM~~M;$;M;$;C!i~;$;;$;;$;~; S .19> U)Z '<t~~~~ fßC!i~~t:; C'¡IM"'rU";' ~¿,O<'?<'? ~~~~g¡ '<t~'<t'<tN <'?O<'?~O N ~Z...,>~~ u.~Zzu.u. ~ca::~f-~~>.:..Jf- u.Ou.Uu.U.Zu.U ðiiii~ii ~~~~!!:1>~~~;;¡;:I:~...,~ u.u.u.u.o:=Zu.u.u.o:=Ou.Zu. ca:: ~ Q. .9 ~ ~ Z Z~¡~ ~~~~ .!!! ~~ z ~fi~zfifififi fififi fie: Z -~O -- - 0 -- 0 OCU~ cucucucu cucucu cu- OQ) f- Q)Q)~Q)I~:;) Q)Q).! § f-Q)~OQ)Q)Q)Q) Q)Q)Q) 'O_Q)~-OE Q)mQ) e:mmomlë~ mmo ~I~cu e:mcu mmmm mmm m~~'O ~-e:~Q)oe:e:>e:~_'Oe:e:- ~C~ oe:I/).!!!e:e:e:e:"~e:e:e:e:Ie:!c"~ ~15!i~~5!5!€5!E~j5!5!~i~-~~~t5!II5!5!5!5!~£5!5!5!~~5!~E8~ 1~.oQ)e:Q)oQ)e:e:oe: -e:e: :;)cuël~cucu e:II> e:e:e:e:exe:e:e:cu8e: _e:Q) u<a::~~~~~~z~8~~~~ðoo:¡:~'ø~~~~~~~~~~mõ~~~:¡:oo~~~8~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 ~~~ 0 ~b~g ~ ~'<t <'?~ ~<'?O '<to~ '<t ~~~Nt:; C!i~~"" g '0 xa ~~ -.... 0 II.. x~II-N '<t0o~w~ a:: ~ca::, ~~ ¿~e N~ ~ 2~ ¿~ ~:~<CI)< ~~ ~ ~~ ~~.~ !~ ~ ø~ ~O'OO 00 0l!!CI) 00 I? ~ 0 ~oooo ooo~oo>o ce:a::e~e:e: e:a....,oe:e:~I~ E?£~~e: ce:e:e:e: e:e:e:.c:IC:ca.. cucuo~cucu..cu ~a::cucu~~ ".0 ~.o(\ cucucucu CUCU(\e: cuõ" .. ~gf!3EEf!f!°f!~2..f!f!I/)a.. O.!!!~~Ef!-gf!f!f!f!~-f!f!f!Q) f!Q)Joo c~o~g¡~OO~Ol!!a::~OO~~"~ê:¡::¡:~OU~OOOO~~OOO£~O~Oo~ ",~~CI)I~~CI)CI)!CI)II!CI)CI)O~~~~SøCl)UCI)I~CI)CI)CI)~x~CI)CI)CI)CI)IIC1)E?:¡:g¡~ :..cu~oa....-ooQ)o~ uoou.~CUU __~o-~ooooo~ooo'<t~oa..ø~e:Q) O'<t0 ~:¡:00Q)0 N oo~ 0 ~~-oo-'<t0ooomooooo o<'?~c '0 ~N~O NN>NN<'?NNN~"" m~---N-~NNNNOZNNN'<tON~~ ..., ~N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~R~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~M~~~~~~ CÞ E III C U. ~ CÞ C ~ o CÞ E III C ~ ~ ! ~ CÞ E III C U. ~ Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ o:ã E?E -;;; g ~ c ~~ æ! e:c ~--= Q)-~-ß- 8 ~ ~~ e: ~~ m ~ I/) 00 ~~~ i ~ cu ð~ ~~ ~~~ U 0 I ~ ~I/)b .~ ~ i cuC ~m ~= ~~~ I ¡~ 0 ê C~! ~ c.~ ~ ~~ .~_a::.Q)_ cu§ BB~i2' ~ ~~ ~ ª ê~~ 0:= ~~ cu =.cu !;' E·-2....·cl- ~ .!Q) '" a: Oïiicu _ ..iU. ~i2'CI)O I/) ~~ 5!a::~Q)Q)~~ e: Q) _m_~ I- >cN :;) Q)~~ cuf-E?E 0:= ocu=~~oc -cu .!!!..¡~a::u - >o~ CÞ~ ~ e: Q.~~CU ~ o~ocua::~1S££e:~o~~æ I/)Q)~£~I/)~O ~a::'O_ E~I~~~ ~~~~.!!!E~gE?1i~~~!!~~~~I~il~Q)I~I~1 ~~gf ~w~~~Q)~~j~~8~1!~mu.~__...,...,...,~CI)m~~~0~~~03~~i a..~~~~ ~ 0:= ~=~.c:~~ ~a..""u.:I:~.c:~~CI)Q)Q)~-~'O :¡: 00- ~c~ ....~oa..m~a::~coc:¡:~~~ 1/)~~ö~~~Q)£~~~w~u....,a.. UUCI) iCu.b< tg~E?Q)...,...,ie~~'OI~Q)£~I~cuæ.oææ~~ii¡ ~~~~~8~~wa..Q)cul/)Q) c.c:O~O~~~-1::~31~CEe::;)~~ CU'O'OO~II>I/)=ê'OEEEE-~"C~='O-C ~~~§2cucu.c:l!!ocucucu~ooo'O'Og~eeQ)Q)~~~cu=cucucucu~II~:;)~cg~ occcmuuuuuocooooowwwwu.u.OOØOO:I::I:...,...,...,...,...,...,...,...,~~~~~ ~~~~~~9~~9~~~~~~~"'r~~"'r~~9~"'r~C'¡I~~~~6~6~6~~~~~ 888888888888808888888888888888800000000000 000000000000000000000000000009999999999999 N~~~Nœ~œN~œ~ôN~~~~~~òø~œo~~~~~V~N~~~ØMOM~~ O~M <'? ~ 0 ~ ~~ ~~N' 0 N ~ _M<'?MM 0 N<'?~~N ooo~:goC!ioC!ioo~ooooC!ioooo~o~~oC!ioooooooC!io:gooooo ~~~.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~·~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~2~~~~~~~~~~2~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 11.'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t'<t -ci CII ~ .5 "tJ QI '" ::> c: QI QI ..e QI > . CIIj1 .r:...e .....CII QI= - CII ..e > .!!! CII ëü c: > QI CII.r:. QI ~ à3 ~ -¡ ::! -QI '" "" QI"tJ ","tJ '" CII ~"tJ "tJ QI "tJõ CII QI '" t::: 'ª 8 It) rn >. O' - o . Q. N"'Q. QI ::> iñ::!'" GI....QI:= o.....~ 'i'GI:g"tJ It).QCIIC: oEQlCII cGl-"tJ ::I~~QI a.ZEE aII.!8.s! ~ ~.5·5 'i'..QI~ It) III > QI o.!!~..e N I! "0 '" O:~2!~ ~ cc .5 8 o ~_'" Ie ~GIº~ I!! a. - -... GI e 8 QI :: a.. (¡¡.~ ~EQ.~ ..OQlQ. ,2.:¡g<c i~~~ -....0) o GIS Q. Q.::>oe ccOza. ¡= -co N o N "cb...... Lt)0)Lt) 0)00) ~~~ M-VOV""-COLt) Lt) co COO co...... NCO co COCOLt)OLt)M MLt) Lt)...... C?z~9~~ C}'~ ~~ ......o......o~~~~~~~~~~o~~ Lt)MLt)MVo)OGlvOCOO)M""CO""GI~ O),...O)COXVMVCO,...MvO......MCOvO) ~O~V~MOMO~OM~~~~~~ a. !Ñ S S...J>...J...J<C...J- fI) u..Zu..u..~u..~ ...JJ::...JI->J::...J<C...J-........J u..zu..()~zu..a.u..~zu.. ~ (.) Z ~ ~~ ~ o~ ~ i§~ ~ ~ ~~ ~~~~-~ ~r~QI J ~~ c:~c:c:~c:~"'c:c:c: ~J::c:~_o c:C: ~o~~.s!~~I~~~'m€~~EQlg~i c:~c:c:~c:~"'c:~c: N C:Qlm~'UC:QI ~£~~~~m~~u..~~m~~ð~j~~~ vCO M M 00 0 0 g :...... ~ ~ N ~ ~ ,... ~~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 ~ ::I~ ~ < < ~ i ðQlð~ ðð...ð ð "tJ ð ~ -ð æ~ææ æ~~æ æ~~ æ>~ð~æ~ 8...8858gCll8~8<CS 8<C~.r:.~8~ o~oo~o~~Ovo~~~oø......~~o~ 0rnærnrnSrn~õrn~rne::>QlrnE~Qlrnrn"tJ 00>00 oV()0~oClloc:omrnm>8~ ~O>OO~ONo)O~OJ::~~OJ::,...M> ~ "ONCONNQNLt)Lt)N......NLt)O NCO......NCON> ~~re~~N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ GI E nI C u.. t;::! GI C ~ GI E nI C ...J t;::! III C ~ o elf E nI C u.. g ::> £1 ~ 0 :¡;¡ ~ ~'" § ~ '" > c:--E-~~--~-~ ~-~g~ S ~ ~o ~ J CII £ õ~t!! æ () c.?~ ~ g c: QI J::Q)QI .r:. rn mO"tJ::> 0 ~ ~Z.r:._ () _ ~rnN ::> ...J N o~ 1-= G OQl~ <C c: () ...JøQ)~~t!! <C ~c: Zim '" i QI ~::>êc:~~ ~ ffiZCII æQlCII ~ "tJ ~ £()m~w~ m .r:.= ::> CII 5 ...J~Oc\ ~ ~ ~£1 ~~~ ~ ~£1~ ~Q)""'~~¡ QI C:QI ø()8 0 "'QI~o~.ª~c:_~ GI~ j~~~~~"tJ§~J~Cllj~~~jj1E E'" -CII"'CllCllomoNQ.CIIC:--oOQ).!m nle~~.r:.ð05~~E~3a.~~~~J::z>6 5~E~()..........tOu..~~""'~QI""'.....""'...Jrn<c~ ~~~mwøørnm~~~~~oš~c:~~~~~ GlCII~I-£CllCllc:j1 ....CIIEmfiQl"'EE88 C¡i~t~~!~QI~*~~tS)~~~££ ~~~~~~~~za.a.a.~~rnrnrnl-I-I-» .... .. GI C ~ 6~666~~~6~6~~~~~6~6~~ 000000000000000000000 ~9q999999999q99999q99 oCO~V"""o)CONMv"""""o)NMCO"""OMMM ~80~88o~8oo8~~~~8~8~o ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ U..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ nlLt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt)Lt) a.vvvvvvvvvvv~vvvvvvvvv co ""v a; ~;:jIj .,. NN ......M,.....O,....~~cÐ Lt)COLt)......Lt)GlLt)N O)¡e~~~GI~1ó ~OMMM~Mv ,...ONr-r--,...O)......-OO VOLt) OvN NN -..:t~~ Ll)-..:tN ~~ N....."It ";'~.,. ";''';' ~~Nr--.ONr--..,-co'oc:t-.:t :£~;:jIjLt)Lt)......Lt)NO)NN vs:......O)Lt)~~~O)a;o.; M~......~~MMO~vv M i~iiiii~i?;:~i~ii~i~~ '" c: QI ~ ~ . m CII ~~~c.?~ ~ ~ ~ Æ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~~QI~~lg~~ ~EE gj1~m~~~ª~~()~::>a.~§~~~ ø~øEømøSø~cøj~~~~¡¡ c:mc:~c:::>c:Cllc:::>Qlc:QlQ)~mQlQ)QI ~rn~a.~w~~~3ð~z~~()rnoo ,... MM~ g g Lt) .~~ ~ i ~~; ~ ~ i ~I~ ~ ð ð~ð ð ð_Qlð °ð~~~.. c:Q)c:~c: c:ðc:a.>c: ~c: 00 æ~~oæ~m"'æ~~æc:~mæ~00 0c:OCIIOOO~O _0...J 0ECllt!!~ Ooolo~o~ojco~~OQl~()() rnfrn()rn~rn~rnjmrnæ8rn~~" VCIIvovmv ~ornv~ v~rnc.?c.? ~J::~~~ó~~~~......~~~ðoLt)oo ~~~~~~~~~~~~œ~~~~~~ 8 0 2 I- oð .. ~ c: CII m ~ z ~ ü: "#. ,- , ~ 0 CII"3 E 0 !I: ~~~ ·2.... Q);>.- -ª.\:1'iQ ·C.!!! ..eCII'" .!!!~> g ~ i!~æ a.~m~ ~ QI ::> ~ () ~ 8 .5 Q) CII'§ ~~ CII~ m=0~ Q) QI ø::!C: iC¡O__ £ £ g Q)¡~CII§CII~~ü~~"'2 -e~~ E....r:.~~~.r:.~a.Clløm.. -ªo~CII8C11J~QI~_mªCIIEoc:l-l- mo~."~~¡~£;~æm~~~g~¡ ~~Q)5C11""'a.2Q1~t!!Z()~oR..c:c: ::>E~-"'QI I-::>~()~~~~~J::>::> >~~<Cc:~~ ...J<C..... .r:.a. ~~J::J:: m~()~w",~O~",,,,~Q.ø~mo...J...J ~~CII§~~m§~!!~i~l>rn00 Æ~êi~~i~;~2¡1~~J~~~ <c,<cc<cmmmu()()()()OOwwww ~6666~~666~~~66¿~66~ ~ooooooooooooooooooo ~qqooooooqq9q9qq9qq9 O~N~~~~~~~NM~~~~~~~~ u~~ooooooo~~~oo~oooo 090oooooooooooooooo~ i~iiiiiiiiii'iiiiiii i~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN ~ooooooooooooooooooo ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -ci ns CD ûí .5 -0 CD '" ::I I: CD CD .c CD iûÆi .c:.c _ns ~~ .!!! ns ë;¡ I: >'CD ns.c: CD ~ OJ ~ i g¡ -CD -'" "- '51 ~ '" ns !!!-o :g~ ns CD '" t: ::I 0 ~ 0 :gCl)~ ON ui 2: CD ::I ,,;g¡'" g-;:!!!~ CjlCD~-o lI).J:Insl: o E CD ns CCD..-o ;:)~..9!CD a.. z ~ E ailJ!8..2 ~ ~.5·5 CjI..~ä¡ II) CD ns CD o.!l!.c:.c ~I!!"CI'" .8:2!~ ~ < .5 8 o ~.'" IE ~CDº~ I!! Q.- .... CD e 8 CD = a.. êõ .!!! t!EC.~ se5!c. ......0< '.. "CI.c: >- ~·ê ':": ¡ og: oS g. ~a~à: =~~~o~~~~m~omoo~ ~-~ ~~om~~~ ~ 0 ~ ~~N~O~O~ 0 ~ ~ _~~~~ ~ 0 ~ ~~~~omN~ ~ _ ~ _~~~~ N 0 ~ NNNN~~~N M ~ N NN~~~ ~~O~~~M~~~~N~Ò~NN~~NO~~o~~N~~~~ a..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-~.~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~R~~~oB~~~~-~~~~~~~~:~~~~~~~~~~ ~ 0'--'-- m 0 CO¡o- ~~ ~o~~ ~~ ~~ -O~~N~~ ';'~ ~9NN~mN Lt),....L(),....,....('I)cÞ~('I')d:J~ ~~~Il)~¡e~~~o;~ ~~R~~~R~z~~ ~ S J!~~-~«<~~~~<->~>~~>w~_~~~~>~««~~~~~~~ 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~z~zz~z~0~~u~~z~~~~~~~~zu~~ >~ z~ I~ (.) '6~ ns CD Æ~ '6 .c: '6'6 '6 '6 ëØ ns 0 nsns ns ns ns.c: () I:ns CD CD CD -0 CD 130 CC ~ Æ .!!! E CC CC CC I: q¡1.Q CC tí ..9! g¡ C) ä¡-~!~§ ~ä¡ä¡-ä¡£~~ä¡~~cc£ ",E œ",~C)",,,,E"'~~ûí"'()ëE~ ä¡.!!!¡q¡~£~ä¡ä¡.!!!l:oonsl:£~~::I ~~~OøCl)~~~~~~CI)W~~~~~ '6z'jij'6 ns ... ns ()o:: CD cc...q¡CC I: O.c I: () '" c. () ",-oE'" 1:.5 ns I: ~3:u~ , '6'6 '6'6 '6 C\ C\ C\ C\ C\ () CD () () ,() CC CC I: CC CC C) CC ê6-e ¡ ~ § æ f¡1.5 55 ~ œ <II <II i <II '" .~ <II ~ ~ ~ ~ I!!.- ä¡ ä¡ G) æ æ <II æ££££ CCø~~Z~~O~CI)CI)CI)CI) '6 '6 ns ns G) G) CC CC ä¡ .- ä¡ E '" .- <II E '" ::I ·E E I:nsl:ªons ~~~~~~ ~ CO~ 8 ~ N ~ ~~ N ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ' N ~ ~ co W~ ~ ~ 5 ~~ ~ x~ O...~ ~g ~B ~ ~ ~ ~~ 0 ~--o ~~... -ow... < ~~ ~~... ~~~ ~~G) ~ c~~ 0000 ~G)O ~~ ø"'O~O'" 0 0<0 G)O> 0 l:õJ! 1:1:~1:G)G)31: C\,U -001:::11:0 I: 1:£1:" >1:< I: C\~oCl) nsC\.c:C\>=-C\ ~~~ ol:C\8C\I: C\ (\~.CI) <C\G) ns 8-~õ~I:G)88~8<~æ8 <C\c~oC\8 ~C\I:81:1:1:1:8~8<11 -8~~8 03:1: ~~~OONOûím.c:o ..-o~0~80£08~0~~~~0-0~~10=~0 ",CI)CI)£~x@G)CI)CI)3:CI)B3:~CI)õ~~5~~OCl)~CI)onsCl)££f£CI)3:CI)aG)~CI)~xCl) "'~-~-oC\"~~CI)~S-Æ~~ðG)coooCl)~~~CI)¡~¡¡C\¡~CI)~ð~cc.oi~ f~comNcc~~~~_ðN~_~.!!!~CC~cc~~~~~8~~~~~~~g~N.c:~~~_~ ~0~Ñ~0~CI)08~0~mNoUocoN9_00NO~COO~~~~0~ONCI)~01l)~0 q,....,....,....=~,....N,....,....N,....~,....,....,....,....~NN~N,....,....N,....œ,....,....,....,....,....,....,....N,....,....WN,....('I)~,.... CD E II c: u.. c=:! CD c: ~ o , CD E II c: ..J c=:! CD c: ~ o . GI E II c: u.. <II œ CD .c C\ æ~ I: t:.:s! I: ~.c:<II G)-'" e~~=~~~~~ I ~ t~~ gt I ~.c: I ~~ª~~~~ . ~ 1-- ~ E ::I.!!!~ ~2::1 ~ ¡ ~~ø q¡CC~æä¡ä¡ä¡ 0 £J ~ ~ ::I~.c: ~~ 3: ~ ~ 22< >~o~~~~œI:M~£ Æ i-o~ ~lu"l o~ G) ø ~~ _~~~ ~£I:««i~~Æ§ ~ ~-~ ..9! E CC~ £ ~ o~ ~....J~o ~~fl:l:l:l:>~>~ø C\ I ~CI)~_~K!G) ~~ -C\e ~ I~ ~~~~ ¡~ns~~~~~~w~~ Z ~ ~~~~CI)...o~ C\~ ~U~t: "'~C\e ~~~wwww~~>-c~C\ ~_ wnsns~"'~<IIO~ ~G) u"l:~ 0 ~uu v_ ~~>-~G),vEns w w ns-o~-8 ns0..2 0 ...£C\~œ....J"'<II -0 N ~"''''<II<II.c:~<~U ~ øcl: o_E~-oo c£ ..9!::IE E.c:IG)==~ G) ~<II"''''0~00~~ ...;EI E-~==-ns~-o"-o~>ns .c:O-o~-~o~()G)~ q¡=O-G)G)CDG)~c~_~c - g¡ G)oS~.c:nsœnsc--cG)m~5~~e022v >G) CCI:C-~C\~.c:0E()~~~ IIG)-.0_E<IIEU~UØ~~~3::1vm~~~ u~~~1!! cO~~~~...ns"'>~ë'=EG).cG) c~ ::10 --~<II~ vv~>cc G)znsOww~G) 0 ~o~ -00 ..J~CI)CCU~<u~~~o~o~~ o<~~~~.c:~ cc~~~~~i~~.c:Ø~N~~~ ~~~~0~G)G)G)~~CC<~I~~..9!~<II0<11<11<11.!!!~£0~~~~~>W~~_~ ~~~ t~~- ~~~-nso» ~C\.c.!!!()G)G)()G)E3:::I ~ w ~ns~<II cl:c-o-o-ooooœE~55 ~~E~EEEEE!!! gIIIIII:I:CDG)ê~io-o03 ~œœ!!!!!!!!!G)~~~=~nsnsG)=o::lm~C\nsC\nsG)ioooooojjJJ3~~....J()~~q O~~~~~øvvvøv~~~~~~£~~~~~~~~~~~~~... ._~~ ~~~ ~ .. GI C :t So ~9~~~~~~~~~~~~9~~9~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 8888888888888888888888888888888 9999999999999999999999999999999 ~-~~~~R~~o;~~~~gR~~co~~8~~B~~~~~g o~ooooooooo~oooooo~oooooooooooo 9999999~99999999999999999999999 e~~~~~~~~~~~~~&~~~~~~~~!~~~~~~~~ -~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ B..NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 0000000000000000000000000000000 1I~~~~~Il)~Il)Il)Il)~Il)~Il)Il)Il)Il)Il)~Il)Il)~~~~~Il)~~~~ a..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NN 00 00 09 d>_ CO~ 00 00 tt ~~ NN 00 Il)~ ~~ m~~NOc)COCO"t 660006000 000000000 000000009 ÑcbJ>tbo,MC»cb('f) ~om~Nm~_~ 00000000-0 000000000 tc!;ttc!;c!;c!~c!; ~~~~~~~~~ NNNNNNNNN 000000000 1l)1l)1l)1l)~~~1l)1l) ~~~~~~~~~ 1:Ì <II .91 (/) .5 '0 Q) (/) :;, c: Q) Q) .0 Q) > . <II~ .s;;.o -<II Q)= - <II .0 > .!!! <II ïij c: > Q) <II.s;; Q) ~ æ' :ß .s;; (/) ~ (/) -Q) (/) ... Q)'O (/)'0 (/) <II !!!'O '0.91 '0 " . g . ã. ~(/)o. .~ Q) :;, lIi~cn g:!!!~ c¡:aGl:g'O 1ft,c<llC: o E Q) <II OGl-'O ~>~Q) Q.~ ~ E 011.19802 ~ .a .5 .5 c¡:a..Q)äj IftGl>Q) o.!!~.o N I!! '0 (/) æ 0. - <II .q,C.s;; ~<I:.5~ o ~.(/) IE ~GIº~ I!! 0._ .... ,!!eê5! - Q. <11'- ~Eo.~ "oQ)o. .2./::~<c :!i~¡:~ -....CD OGl.91c. q,:soE! <l:OZIl. ~~ ~~ 00411 .19....J tnu. ~r:1~ m~Mo--~-o-~o-mm M~O~~O~ ...,. ...,. ...,....,.NO...,. 1ft ...,.Ift...,....,. N 1ft 0...,. ~ Iftl~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ tõ ~ ~ ~...,. 0 0 . ~ I I I . ¡ I I I I ..~ ..~ I ~ <'? CO? ~1ft~~mm~N~~~~~~~N~~~""'~~~~M...,.m~~~N~""'~ ~Z~NON~O~~;~lftm~~~~~~Ift~~~...,.~~Ift~~~~ðlft ~~~~~Mg~~~~~M~~~~g~~~...,....,.g~80~""'~~N~0~ O~M~O ~~ ~ M ~~~~M~~~~M~~~ M ....J ....J~....J....J....J~....J....J~Z>Z-....J....J<C....J....J....J~....J....J....J....J<C»....J....J<C»~....J II. u.~u.u.u.zu.u. u.u.u.ll.u.u.u.~u.u.u.u.ll.ZZu.u.ll.ZZZu. ãi '0 £~£ £ ££~ ~ £~£ £££~ '0 ££c: .s;; mlgmzm ~mm~ ~¡<IIë<ll <II<IImë c: <limo Q) ~ mjmOm 'Ommm....J Æ£ÆI~Æ ÆÆÆ~~~ ÆÆg<ll~ Æ äj-äj<lläj~~-j::Eäjäj~I-'t:äjl~~~äj~äjäjäj~~~~äjäj~äj~êc: (/)M(/)~(/)~=EE~Q)(/)(/)c:Q)E<II(/)5(/)m(/)m(/)(/)Ø<ll~.91E(/)(/)£~~nQ)(/) c:~c:=c: <II~=C:C:mX<ll:;,c:~c:...c:'t:C:C:C:"'~m C:C:'" oC: ~~~o~~~~~Æ~~æ~~w~~~8~æ~~~8~øS~~~~a~~ N 1ft...,. ~ ~~ ~ ~ NM o 0 - 00 0...,. 0 ~OO ~ ~ ~...,. ~ ~Ift 1ft 0 ~ o~m NO N ~ ~ ~ Q)~ ~~ ~ ~t::~'O~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~~ <C>Q)~ ~~ - ~ ~Q)~~~~~ ~~ ~~ o O~o »OO.....(/) 0c:O~O~OOO... _$00 Ilð c: c:~c: ",<c> c:c:00'O c:....Jc:.s;;c:Ëc:c:c:O'OU~c:c: m_~ll.m ~-'O <II<IIQ)~~ mc:mõmommm"OC~Q)<II<II Q) c: ~:~w~~¡~i_~8~c:~~~~8~8ð~~8jm~18~~~wð~ O~OO m~UOO~.!!! ~OmO 0 OOOma>~OO~OC:Q)O =enäj(/)~en~::E~~äj(/)en~~lx(/)êen~(/)~en(/)ÐÖ~,!en(/)~~~~(/) f:I~~:~(/)M~~:~(/)~m~~C~~:~~~~glftøo~:~~z¡"'" "Og~o~gO~~N<cgO~M~0Il.0~Olftg~oooæ~~~ogNN~Ö~o ~-~-~-~NN~M__~M~ -M-~-Ift---__IftN_~N_mN_ I~ (,) 411 E ftI C II. ~ GI C ~ o GI E ftI C ..J ~ GI C ~ o GI E ftI C II. .... .. GI C ~ o 8 c: .!:!=C: o ~ Q) .~ '- èõ.~ .:t:. ~ êU ¡ -c:: m:;' E"'''''O m:::''O'" 0 N-OE C:Q)-~-~o-m--C:~~~~~-8~~~~ 16 ~ c:g¡,o ~ c.::E E! .!O mou ::Em, .- J ~ e~I(/)!!!~ æ~~~ ...m¡~êi~..J~ ~ 8 c:en Ø!!! o~~IJ ::E~!w~~~m~<C16£ ~~ ~ .!!!It: 2::E c:.o oc<Eocï:: äj'~(/)Cllë:ffi_::E~!~àsê.go .glt: >c: :;,m c: CII m",o 0 _V'<c.s;; ::EQ)C:-::E 0 CII _c: ~f j~ ê 2 Ç~i~~::E ~g~¡~_~~m"J....J~.s;;1 ,,~! mQ) CII> 3 ~ (/)!oll.i~ ~~~::E~E!~~æ~z_~UoCIIlg£~Q) ~~ ~~ ~ ~ W5c ~~ ~~~ ~~ .m~~se-c 812 ~ ~~! ¡~t~~:iii'~~I~¡~II~~;III~IIIII~II! ~.~16c:~~~~~!!!~~ð~~g....J~æ::æ~£ffi~Æ~meu::8~m~a16 ..J>~~j(/)~(/)w~2(/)~~0::E~W~~~~....Jocðocm~~~",::E<oc~m~ ~oc£OCãi<C16ãiãiuQ)~~~Øi!:g~~~'t:'t:'t:'t:~~C:CllCllmCII~~J.s;;EI~ !~~~e~~~æJ~~I~J~5~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~jê~~~ ~33~~~~~~~~~~~~~~æææ~~~~~~~¡:¡:¡:¡:;~5~~3 , ~~~~~9~~~~~~~~~~~YT~~~~~~09~~~~~~œ~~ 000000000000000000000000000000000000 9~999999q999q999999999999q9q99999~99 ~~~~re~NMN~~~~~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~æ~~~~~~ ooooooðooooooooo~ooo~ooooooooooooooo qq999999999999999999999999999999999q e~~ðððððð~ð~~ðð~ð~ð~~ð~~ð~~~ðððð~ð~ð~ B..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~% 000000000000000000000000000000000000 :~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ MO MN ~~ "i"':' oolftm ~Lt)NCO ~mM~ 0>0('1")...... ...........('1")..... 1ft <C>..J> Il.Zu.Z g ïii <IIQ) ~ 'Ë E! .91 ~ gc:>~ ~~~õ .....to..... 0:;,£0 .~ 8 ~ ~ ~~::æ .0 !> en c: .5 œ~'j ~~m~ .....CO....."ICt ~Ift-<O - CII ~ ~-- <C '" !!! o õ o ~ ~ CII ~ N CII 0 c: mc:W c:!!!.!!!,g i~~~ ¡¡:<CU~ ::E~e~ Q) 0 CII CII c:£€E c: c: m Q) <<cmm .Q ~ ~ i~Ift"i~ 00000 00000 0000 CO I , t I ~MMO log 8 ~ ~ 8 ëD~~~~ .,,0000 -=~~~~ c: I I I I ~~~~~ ;¡:Il) 1ft 1ft 1ft ''''''''''''''''v -ci 1'0 CD ûi .5 " CD II) :;, c: CD CD .Q CD > . 1'0.9/ .t::..Q _1'0 CD:: - 1'0 .Q > .!!! 1'0 ëõ c: > CD ro.t::. CD ~ Q) ~ .t::. '" ~ '" -CD '" " CD" 11)" II) 1'0 e" ",S "<.> 1'0 CD '" t: à8 It) (I) >- g .Õ, ~"'a. .~ CD :;, rñ~Ø g:e,¡ «:j)aI:g" It)J2roc: ClECDro QaI-" ;:)~.9/cp A.Zg-E "':!8~ ~.a.5·- 9t~~ It) III 1'0 CD CI_.t::..Q NI!,,'" ~ 8: I!! ~ ~ ct .5 8 o~_",¡¡: ~alQ~ fa.--.... ,!!eê5! -A. 1'0'- ~Ea.f!! OCDa. .e.t:~¿ .., "a .s:::. >. ~-!':":¡ o aI,S a. C+:;,oe <ll:OZa.. =m~m~~~-oo,....~m--O~~M--com,.... O~N~~~~~mN~~OO~~O~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~~~ ~ ~~~ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~9~~~ ~ ~æ 9~9 ~~~ y ~~~ ~~~~~ ,....,....,....,....M~M,....~oo,....CO~,....,....~co~oo,....cocoo~,....,....,....OOOM ,....It)M ""'''''',....,....M ~~~M~O,....~N~~øO~~~O~~~~,....N~~CO~~It)MO~CO~~,....It)It)~~OM A.mmmoo~~lt)mM~m commm,....oo~mMo~m,....mmm~N~ooo~mmmmN~ Ñ~~~~~~~~~~~ÍN~~~~Ø~~~o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ S ¿; ïi ïi ïi ïi ïi ::E ïi ïi ¡:ds ïi co ~ïiü:ïi~ <>-J<--J-J>-J-J-J~>Z~~Z~Z ,_-J-J-J-J-J-> ~zu..~~u..u..zu..u..u..~ ~ -u..u..u..u..u..~Z I~ to) ü !! ü 0 .... I~ 0 :Ii titifi ~ti ~fi~ ti.t::.fi ~ ti", 1'01'01'0 CDro ~roO rogro 5 1'0= ~~~ 5Ü~ "CPZCDCDCD~e(l)~ CD 1'0 ............ ,.,....<.>c:lDiii"'IDID......Oo.!,.CP 1Du.. c:c:c:s ~~c:f!!roc:()~c:c:c:.t::.CD~Ec:!!! CDCPCD~-'üCDro~CD~....CDCPC(I)~~roCDCP "'''''''roEc:c:'''E>~C:ü~~~I~~~=~E ~~~ð~~~~~G~~~~~~ÆÆ~~~~ ti fitifi cpfititititi œ ro ro ro CD ð ro ro ro ro ro c:CDœCPCPCD't: "CDCDCPCDCD OlD ",IDIDIDro ØIDIDIDIDID ....-c:c:c:c:c:a~'t:.!!!~c:c:c:c:c:c:§~ cp.¡ CD 8 CD CD 51 CP c:" c:~ 0 CD CP CP CP CD "'Iß ëCP~~~~C:~~~~~5~~~~~~~ u..U~Z~~~ID<~ü~~~~~~~~1D IDIDID ID ID ID IDID IDIDIDIDID ~~M M~ ~ ~mm ~ ~ ~N ~~~~~ ~~~ ~O~ ~~~N~~ ~ ~ N~ ~M~~M ~a~. ~ ~~~ a~~a~~ I~ O....>~ a~ --~-- «< ~ Oq_,,<~~<~~ 1<11: ~_ <~ ¿¿<II:~¿ ~-~c~ ø~¿~~wc-~~ ø - ø~~ -- c ---_~ ooo~~iiiC:ð....lDo't: 000 '" 0 ~'t:0 00 -J ~ 00000 ~~~~~~~c:oE~2~~~~_i c: ~~~ö~~ ~ i ~~C:C:C:C:C:~CD 888IM~Ørot~8:~888(1)~ co~,....~~8E8~~~~~~~~~~~~~¡~ oooo:~la~~o~~oooiCDc:~o~~I~oloo~N<I~~~oOOOO.Qûi (I)(I)(I)æ~z~(I)~ro(l)~~(I)(I)(I)~~~x(l)x~(I)(I)ë(l)(I)xWz~()U~3(1)(I)(I)(I)(I)ee IIINNN ~u..NV NNN :;,~ONOIt):!:N=NNO ~UW~~NNNNNa..~ e~~~oo~~,....o~CO~~It)~~~m~olD~lDm ~o~~ID~~ NIt)It)~~It)""'m ~ooo~~~~~~~;~góoo~~lt)ooo~æozoooo,....~~~~ooooo~1D ~~~~M~~~~~N~~M~~~~~M~~~M~~~~~~~~œ~~~~~~~~~~ CD E lIS c: u.. <;:! aI c: ~ o CD E lIS c: ...I <;:! aI c: ~ o aI E lIS c: u.. ... (I) '; t W ~ él i:ï¡.- I~ ::I ~ ~ ~ g-~ I c:~~:ï¡~~- ~ I ~-I :ï¡-, ~ ~= ~ ~ ~ê e ~ a.. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~II", ~ ~c:iÆ : i I ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ~:ï¡ ~~~¡ <..>~ ~i~~ CD~ro O§ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ - - _o_!D~ I~ -w~5: 0._ . Z 'C::;, 1'0 p" - ~ -- :ï¡ûi~ c: 0 .!!! ro .t::. - c: oCPro-J ~~",... -'C:< _ ro _ ~ ~~ _ OC:'- 0'C:~1?: 1'0 él(l)~'-œ a...t::.,., ~ '" 'C:::I ~ ~~_ (¡¡ .!!!o~fi --~c:ro ~ r-WCDØ~ <ü~ CP ~ roN~ él ~ç~ ~ I:ï¡E(I)ro~~ roø I~ -u..Æ~~ .t::.~~~~~ ~ ~~~ r- ~~(I)C:N aI~~o~~~.!!!~E'" ro't: ~-J:;'CDCO -~5 Cc: ro~CP~-9:;'.t::.WroCD E:;,CD.t::.e"'....12~CD~ læ~ f!!=-J"'c~e~ErolD~roCP::I E.t::.ûi~c:c:o~¡u..E~ ro.t::.r-~~,SroO.Qroc:IE~ œCDc:"'O.t::....-e::'ºœ-rororo<.>o ro >O-J~O ~-J:!:-J<~5Ø~Æ~:;,ro~'t:a..~g~ID~~~ID~)roO~~~(I)(I)ü~~:!:>Ð-O~CP -J>~~.t::.~a..~~-Ja..f!!~ID't:u..w~~w(I)roB< "'§b~(I)«~>a..<.>og~CD~ ~ ~~~~f!!Æ>~~I~~ID~oi=~~§&CD~}~~fo-Jb:!:~.t::..t::..t::.ID~;iC~I~~ aI~i~B§~~~e~!5!~~*g't:~~~.9/a..e:;,"'5~i~~5!5!5!5!et!~~~fi~g i.t::.~<œCPoooo't:.9/~=c:>f!!eroCDCPCDID~CD~OOooooooroCD~rororo_oro oüüooooooowwwwwwu..u..øøø~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~z MMCO<")~"'" 000000 000000 999999 ~omOO""'N CO~It)MCOIt) 000000 9·9999"9 e 888888 - 000000000000 fI.. NNNNNN 000000 1IS~1t)~Lt)Lt)~ A. ~~~~~~ ~6~~6~6~6~6~~~6~~6666~~6~666~6¿~~~66 000000000000000000000000000000000000 00000000000000Q090000000000000000000 ~Mœ~~~~M~~ó~No=œ~~~M~œ~~~~N~~~~~~~~~ ~8~~8~~o~~~~oo~8~~o~o8~80~~00000~000 000000000000000000000000000000000000 MMMMMM~MMMM·M~MMMMM~MMMMMMMMMMMM~~~MM ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN 000000000000000000000000000000000000 ~~~It)It)~~Lt)~~~~It)~It)Lt)~Lt)~~~~It)~Lt)~~~It)~Lt)~~Lt)It)~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -0 co Q üí .5 " Q '" ~ I:: Q ~ Q ~,gi .¡:.c ......!!1 ~ .~ .!!1 co ëü I:: > Q co.¡: !I) :r; .CD :ß 1 ~ -Q '" "" :¡¡:g '" co t!!" :g~ : ê 'ª 8 ~Cf)~ o . C. N:ßg. iii :J! '" ØI....Q;; o....:r; CjlGl :g " ~J:COI:: oEQco oGl-" ::::I > .sI Q A.~~ë oII's8,2 ~ ~.5·5 CjI..Q5i ~GI>Q 0.!!!1!.c ~I!"C~ .~I!!.¡: ~ ë.5 fi O~""'= ~GIº~ r! Q. - ".. CD e ê OJ =A.co·!!! ~EC.~ ..0Qc. ,e.::g« :!~~~ -.....0) o CD .9! c. ~::Ioe ctGZCl. =~M~~~O~ œ-M--m~œN~~ ~~v ~~~ ;1; ~ ~~~;1;~re .. ,~M ,~~ <? N N N N N N N N ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~N~~v~~m~~~N~o~~~~~ A.œœ~OœœMœœvœœœvœ~œ~œœ~ Ñ;¡Ij;¡lj~~;¡Ij;¡lj~;¡Ij;¡lj~;¡Ij;¡lj;¡lj~;¡Ij~;¡Ij~;¡Ij;¡lj~ j ~~~~~~~Z~~«~~~~~«~>~~~ ø~~~~~~~~~U~~~~~U~Z~~~ I~ u -5-5 -5-5 co co co co QCI) I::ÆÆ ~~ g!1::C:1:: :¡¡ :¡¡'Ë~:¡¡:¡¡ 51 c: c: co·- I:: c:)( ~~~¡f~~:f -5-5 -5-5-5 -5 -5~-5-5 coco coco co (1 colgcoco Cl)CI)-gCl)CI)CI) CI)"CI)c.QCI) c:ac:ac:c:ac:ac:a c:ac:c:acoc:ac:a 5i 5i~ 5i 5i ~ co ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '-E ~ ~ '8 ~ ~ c :g c "5 c:E c c co ~~o~~~w~æ~z~~~ c:ac:a c:ac:a c:a c:ac:ac:a c:a c:ac:a ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~~ ~ ;~ M~ ~N ~~ ~~~ N ~ ~H~ Q «ë. g - ~Ie ~ ë.lg ë. Ie... N -- <t -« ¿ ~I<t.:.: « « « l<t ;¡¡; ¿¿ cCw CC cc~ccc"Co-cCI)cc~ ææo~ææ ææuæææ~æ!æ>ææc:a fifi~mfifi5fifi~fififi~fiCf)fi«fifi~ oO~.sIooæOO;;Ooo.!!1oEoloo~ 0Cf)Cf)Cf)ÆCf)Cf)'c:aI::Cf)Cf)~Cf)Cf)Cf)~Cf)5Cf)5øøCl) 0NNO NN NNONNNON:E~ZNN~ 1!!~~Nœ~~N~~o~~~~~ ~ ~~o ~oo~moo~oo~ooõ~o~8~õo~ ~~~~~~~m~~~~~~N~v""M........œ GI E III C U. ~ GI C :r; o GI E III C ..I ~ GI C ~ GI E III C U. Q I:: CI g 5 ~ ~ E 1::' CI):r; co I- 51 1-1- § 1-1- ~I-I- 0 '" ~ E ~ B § :ß !!!CI),g t¡¡~ 5ig 1ij..Q æ iJ~~ ~.~ 155>~:g OU~CI)~'¡: CI)CI) c:c: « CI)~Qj'CI~U c:O.sl« .!!! I:: ...co-€, '-1,." CI) :; g.1!!-gCl.CI)U iÏ!'¡ J:1! _ E c:co«fi~~ ...:E ~æ co§6 t¡¡0:E1::=2æ '&0 "':E Q 8 :r;~ o~E=o« ~..._~> ~o E~o~ªÆ:J!Et¡¡j8~~.üí~~B>R.c~ III cu.¡: Cl)c:c:a Cf)o~"'~~ C:CI)~::I 5J:~g~~æg!~oCf)'¡:Cl.~uÆu~0~1ij~ ~~.!!1~æl~1!~~~~~"o~5iCf)~E~~ CD~,gCOc:~t¡¡"C1!1!1!CI),~~==I~g!~fi~E cCoc~--Q)ooo~,~c881~Q)õcm- ~~zz~~~~æææ~~~Cf)Cf)Ww»~§ .... .. GI C :r; o 66~6~~~6~~~~~6~~~66~~ 000000888888088888000 ~~~~~~~~~~ON~N~~~~~~~ o8ð80o~888~~~~oo8ððoð ~~~~~~~%~~~~~~~~~~~~~ eooooooooooooooooooooo B..~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 000000000000000000000 III~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ A.vv~v~~~~~~~~v~~~v~~~~ m-N--M--~-CXl-~N~ ~ ~ g !õ ~ fó ~ ~ 'Y C?..,. ~ N~~ ~~~~....M~CXlNm""""M~O m~Mm~~~~~;¡Ij~N~....PœN~œ CXlœMœ~~ ØlO œCXI~O'-mMV'O MVCXICXIMM;¡Ij~M~~N~o~""M~œ MM~m M ~M MM CXI~'~MM~ ~ ~~~~U~~~~~~~~~O~>~~~ ~~~ ~~~~~~~~~u~z~~~ .!!! -5r -5 ~ !:! § g¡ .!!1c:amClc:a Cl. æ .5 .5 5i .- ~~ë:g~~ j~¡f~~~ '" CI '2 - Q -5-5'" -5 c.iU'iü-5 cucogcucu Cf)~~co5i ÆÆ'c:~Æ .9!~~Æ~ 5i5i~~5i~~!!!~&~5i~ ~~f!!ê~coëel9~~~'5 ~~8~~ðj~<ë¡f~~S <t ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ g 00 M« ~ 0 :E ë. I~ Ë. I~ ~ C .... , ~ 'ltc: «G)I<!;<Co"'''C'It.9!_ ~ « ~~ ~>-~ ~~~~ 0 -... o o«ooæoo~~... -Cf)0 C:~~1::'¡:~C:~~1::Cl.~0.9!Cf).¡:c: mO~co-coco~~co ~I_C~-CO gfi~£fi~fifiüíC:fi!!!""ëO~~fi_ œoo~o""oo""lolê~I~~oCf) ~Cf)ª~Cf)~Cf)Cf)z~2Cf)ægw<ëc:acuZCf):; 0NM'-N"'NN .....NN>N ON~ c:a~~~~~~~~~~;1;~~~~g~~ 90~~OMOOCXIOO~CXlN~""""ON ~~M~~~~~œ~~~NN~~~~N I:: C? ~ t:. c:'ª ë c: -5 5!.!!/.91 ~ o ~c:O~ e .~ e.g~"'" ~ t: u~· :; ~ ~ ~~~~1!!~' is _:E Æ~~~5i ~~ «2 ~c: Æ'crCU¡:;'~ <ë~_~'" ~cu N l~~æc: -~ !!! -0 G) Cl)1~1:::E0 c:æ'u co ææ~ ~ æ-55!Q:J! ",~:E.¡:~E ~~~E!!!co ~~!~æCl)~e~5cu~ --ëCl)coEiSQj'eo~'¡:oco~-~J:.:.: ~ ...J 01 ~ I:: ~ = == u ~. .s:¡'C: c:a Cl. .5: '" ~ 0 ~~:E~¡f0c:aÆ~~°:E~"''''~~fi2 ee~g¡«~ICf)~~··G)t!!!!~ðc:u coCUC:~c:B ~~§§I::..Q55:r;ot!!"C J:J:.!!1C:C:C:CI)CUCUCl)CI)~OOO~~..Qt!! ««««««c:aooooooooww~~ ~ i9~~~~~9~~~~~~~~~~œ~ 00000000000000000000 Uooooooooooooooooooo 9999999999999999999 ~CXI;1;œ~~~œmMo~MNo....~mœ~ ~~0~ð~ðð~g~o~~~~oð8ð ~0000090000080000000 ÑÑÑÑNNNÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑÑ ~ooooooooooooooooooo ¡~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Sooooooooooooooooooo ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ,~vv~~~~~~~~~~~vv~~~ -ci cu CD iií .5 -0 CD m ::! c: CD CD .c CD > . cu~ ~.c _cu CD= - cu .c > ~ cu ëii e:: > CD cu~ CD == Q) ~ ~ m == m -CD m '" CD-o m-O m CU e-o -02 -ou CU CD m t: àS It) Cf) >- CI - CI . 0. Nmo. CD ::! I/'Î::¡~ g:e~ qGl:g-o It)J:lcue:: ClECDCU cGl--o ::)~~CD a. z ~ E. oðSS.E ~ ~.5·5 q ... ~ åj It)GlcuCD CI.!!!~.c NI!".0 II: 0. I!! ~ tt.5 B o ~.m == ~Glg~ f 0._ ~ ~eê5! .- a. cu .- ~Eo.~ "'OCDo. ,g.::~< -"Ø~ >- IIIGlI-t:: ~·iji8. Q.:Ioe c:a::Ozo.. ~-NMOM~--Mm--~o~~ ~~:ß~r! ~~ :ßM:ß NMNN~ ...r-- N"'I'N ",cbo~~cb<qof'.oJ,O'),.....,.....r-lco~ 1J)('t)~Lt)1l)CO~.....""'CX).....L()I/)IJ)01l) a.m...omm~~~~M~mmmom ~~~¡g~~~~~c~~~~~~~ .! a~~b~~~~ð~~=~~~~~~b~=~~~~ 00 N...N OM MOm ~m ~:ß:g M I;õ~:g~¡;:j ~¡;:j NNN ~ ~~MNN ~~ CX)O,.....IJ)~~~N~~oœ~~~~CX)"',.....,.....M ~m~Mm~~~>o~r--M~~~~O~Il)N ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~I;õ~~~~~ ~OM~MMMM~M~~~MMO...NMM~ r--N ~~ C}'C}I 1ñ1ñ¡g1ñ1ñ mmoome» ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ I~ u CD £ ££ £££ £ £ £££CD ro cu cu cu cu cu cu cu cu cu cu cu·~ z~ cu CD CD CD CD e::~ CD(CDe::CD~t::CD CDCD(~oCDe::Em ~= ~~ CD~ CD ~~~o~CUo~ ~~~3 ~ioæ åj5!õåjåj~Xõ5~Eåjåjåj=åj~~åj_åjåjåjoo~~05~ ~ë~~~~~æ~åjß~~~g~æ~~~~~~t::et::~~E ~ø~~~~~Cf)Uaw~~~ð~~~~~~~~~~~~~æ ££ ££ ££ ££ cu cu ~ cu cu cu cu cu CU CD CD ~ CD CD CD CD CD CD ~~._.."e::~~Q)~~ ~~ e::e::lI:uge::e::~e::e::.ge::e:: Q) Q) m 'e:: 'ª Q) CD II> CD Q) e:: CD CD ~~E~,æ~~'5~~~~~ ~~~:::ï<~~.3~~o~~ III III ! "Ø .~ lfu ~~ ~ < < « 9 < < < ~O °Õ<~ ~ < 2~~ < ~~ ~c ~~ c ~ r--Il) ~ ~r-- r-- 00 N~r-- - ~~ ~~ mil) ~~ o QQ O~OQ ~ 0 --- ~ ~- Q~ O~ QO ~ « 00 3:e~< < ~ ~t~53: ?<t ooc:a::<~~< <~ Õ ÕÕ ~Õ 5c.>ÕÕ~Õ 0 õõõ5!~_ _~ÕÕ -oÕÕQ)ÕÕ-oÕÕ e::Õ e::e:: Õ º~e::e::~e:: e::~e::e::e::e::!c.> Cf)$e::e:: ~e::e::~e::e::a::e::e:: cuII>-ocucu..._a~ E CUCU~CU-o~cuocucucuEO~5t::gcuCU ...~cucu~cucu-ocucu B(a::BBoCf)e::s_cuiBB~Ba::(B~BBBoII>~~ªoe::BBõO""BB~BB~BB OE(OO"'O~g_Cf)c.> OO~O-oEO::¡OOO~åjll)~£~OO~~~OO~OO~OO Cf)~~Cf)Cf)~~Oe::Il)M3:Cf)Cf)~Cf)åj~Cf)c.>CUCf)Cf)OOooW~zW>cuo::!Cf)OOOO~Q)zOOCf)OCf)OO$Cf)Cf) NO~NN~O~sr--l;õzNN~NiiímN NN~ 0 Cf)ONNoê NN~N~~NN ~~~~~>U~~~~~~~~~OO~~~~~~oõ~CX)~~~.....<~~~g~~~~~ O~c.>OO>M~ooooO~OO~OMooOMOOONo~mNr--OOIl)Il)MOOOOO~OO .....N~..........~,.....vN,.....vM..........N.....NCO.........................N~N.....NN..........CX).....~.........................~.......... CII E N C II. c;:! CII C '~ o . . CII E I! ...I c;:! CII C ~ . GI E N C II. ~ ... ~ e:: :E r::: .... ~ Ie:: e:: m! ~ '3~ æ ~ ~ ts ~~ ~ 5! 5 !" '5 E - g --.5 e:: Il·_f-I-+- ~ £ CI(-- o ~ t000 cu ~ ø ê~ e::II> Q) åj ~æ cu~ ~ ~ ~ o~cu ~ CD~- cu x~~ -_~ 0 CD.~ ~~~E ða:: ( ~ ~ ~~~ I- ~fê e ~icu fsro ~ ê~ e::õ~~ Cf)cu a:: ¿ cu ~o..~ < u_.3þ'Æ cu~ê ~~O ~ o~ ~"'cu~ ~~ ê ... ~ ~e::e:: cu ::!-e:: ... "'00 ¡5!~ E a::~ 3cuoo~ ~- cu ( ~ae::~~~ ~ ...J(cuQ)~ ~~o ocu l~e::~e::-oc.>"'I~g~ 0 CII~ ~e::g==ª~~-~~E.cæ cuº"'OQ)ê~-o e::æ5!~g~CD~cucu~=-o~~1 ES ~~~33Sm ~-W(e::E ~S~i~cu~~ (C~~I~==el£~cu~CDB!e~ N£ ~~o!"~IB~!~r...JCf)go~xê3:m 0._ ~ ...J ::!oo~-Z~=o~(m~rn Coots~ ~OOcuQ)~-( ~ SOcu ~ o~'-_~~~...JE~~~a::umo..c.>c..0Cf)~-~ ~(~::!c.>...J~w~o~c.>o~BBØ2~~~-~...ICU _~~ ~~~ ~- ~-o~~~mll>_...J~I-~~~e::e::WOO~w~~~~oÆo~~~<~~:_...Jð~~~<~~ Gl2e::~~(Q)~~ ~o. e~m(S~cu>a::~~...~cucucu~ ~ ::!cu~>-- Ct::~e::==EE~~~~5!5!~==~~i¡~£§su3~)£££g~~~~£~EI!æ~g~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~õðlæ~ææææ~~~~~~~'WI-~~> ~~~~~66~6~6~666~~~~~~~~~~6666~6~~666666666 999999999999999999999999999999999999999999 ~~~~~g~¡g~N~~~~~~~~:ß~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c~re~~~~ 000000000000000000000000000000000000000000 e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~~ ~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNÑNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN .gggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggggg a.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ -0 '" CI.) êií .5 " CI.) I/) -::I I:: CI.) CI.) ~ CI.) > . ",Æ! .t=~ ~'" CI.)= - '" ~ > .!!! '" "(ij I:: > CI.) "'.t= CI.) ~ êi5 fß .t= I/) ~ '" ~~ CI.)" ::! '" I!! " " CI.) "ü '" CI.) I/) t: 'ª S :g(J)~ c . Q. N"'Q. CI.) ::I oñ::!'" ØI"'CI.);; c....~ CjlCD:g" 1t).Q"'1:: C E CI.) '" OCD-" ;:»Æ!CI.) a.. ~ ~Ë coð:lS.2 ~ ~.5·5 CjI..~æ It) CD ",CI) c.!!.t=.Q NI!"CI'" 0:: Q. .. '" -ctl:.t= ~ .5 B ° ~-"';: ~8.º~ I!!ofjð; .!! 0..... .. '" - ",.- ~EQ.[ "OCl.)Q. .e~¡g<c _ "CI .t= >- ~,,! ~ i OCD~Q. Q,::Ioe Cl:Oza.. = o~~"'~~ 0 (1; 0 '" 0 å:J0 ....~ ....co ........ 1/)0) I/) co a.. ~;;I; 0)... 0) '" Ñ .....'" ;;1;..... ;;I;~ S >..J ..J> :I ..J- CI.I Zll. ll.Z ll.::¡: '" CI.) -5-5 -5 CI.) CI.) '" '1:: '" CI.) '5~ CI.) 0 CI.)..., CD::¡: CD", I!! '" I:: .. I::..J CI.).t= CI) CI.) CI) CI) I~ > co "'- U'):t:: .2l:j I:: I:: I::.t= U C>..J ~ð ~;: <c <c co co 0 0 N '" -0'11: 'II: ~o 0 CD I:: 1::-0 CI.) co co I:: èi5~ B", B ~ I:: co O~ OQ) '¡¡j è5 - 0) I/) enx eno I/) ::¡:co N 0 NO ! z.... oCD ON "CI ... ~~ ...'" ~ ....1/) 00 0)... ... ..... 'CD E 0 IS C .5 u. I/) ~ CI.) '" CD '1:: C e- ~ CI.) - "E w 1:: CD CI.) E fl IS ø c ...I I~ ~ CD CO C ;: ~ '# 0 CD E IS C U. ... .. CII C ~ 'ê 0 1/)1- I- ::I I/) .t= 18 êií () .. CI.) ::I CD 0 WCD <c .5 ell. .t= I/) " I:: 1ii .91 I:: co '" 0 ~ 1:: en.... '" Q) .t= '" .~ Q. .. I/) ¡¡j CII e .... f: '~ - E a.. 1:: ::I ~ '" .t= IS CI.) CI.) () ::I Q) c :E fl CD CD ...I 0 ø 0 J: J: .... '" ... .t= J E E E E .. CD ~ ª ª ª ª c ~ '" '" ;: ;: ;: ;: ;:;: I/) ~ 0) I/) co.... 6 6 6 6 66 0 0 0 0 00 9 9 99 99 '" .... "'~ I/) co '" 0 C; ;g N N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 e N N N N NN 0 0 0 0 00 ~ co co co co co co N N N N NN 0 0 0 0 00 IS I/) I/) I/) I/) 1/)1/) a.. ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ØI Treasure Coast Newspapers ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA MAY 16, 2006 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: '. NOTICE is hereby given in' accordance with Sec- tion 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Devel· opment Code and In accordance with the provl· slons of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan that the following applicants have request· ed that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners considers their fOllowing reo quests: 1. MICHAEL BRYANT for a Change In Zoning from the RS . 2 (Residential, Single·famlly . 2 öu/ac) ZonIng District to the AG ·1 (Agricultural· 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the fo!lowing de· scribed property: . 13 35 39 THAT PART OF S 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LYG ELY OF E R/W l·gs·LESS S 42.5 FT- (5.75'AC) (OR 692·2732). Location: west sIde of Bennet Road, approxl· mately 1,950 feet south of Peterson Road. 2. HALF HOUR CUSTOM AUDIO AND ACCESSORIES for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the opera· tlon of a Motor Vehicle RepaIr Service· Body Repair In the CG (Commercial, General) ZonIng District for the following described propertY: ' LEXINGTON SQUARE LOTS 13 AND 14 (1.34 AC) (OR 2051-182). Location: 6900 Heritage Drive. Port, St. Lllcle, Florida. 3. SABIN COMPANIES, INC. fÒr a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a household goods warehousing and storage minl·ware· house facility in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning DIstrict for the following described T~lo~~~ 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, , FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE EAST 560;(1 FEET, AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR CANAL RIGHT OF WAY AND LESS THE RIGHT·OF-WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TOGETHER WITH: THE WEST 520.0 FEET OF, THE EAST, 560.0 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SElmON 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY'I FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 FEET AND THE' NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND THAT CERTAIN PAR- CELCONVEY£D TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST., LUCIE COUNTY. FLORI- DA, FILED FOR RECORD, OCTOBER 12, 1988 IN C.R.B. 607, PAGE 27bPUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LU' , CIE COUNTY, FLORI A. 'ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT· ING THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN O.R.B. 1098, PAGE 1842, AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI- DA., LESS THE WEST 742.98 FEET (8.9 ACRES) ,THEREOF.,", Location: North side òfEdwards Road, approxi- mately 250 feet west of South 25th Street. 4. SABIN COMPANIES, INC for a Change In, Zonln. g from the RS . 4 (Residential. Single-Family - 4. du/acre) ZonIng District to, the PUD (Planned Unit Development· Orchid Place) Zoning Dis- trict and Preliminary Planned Develoøment Site 'Plan Approval for the following described prop· ertY: THE WEST 742.98 FEET (8.9 ACRES) OF THE FOL· LOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: THE SOUTH 1/2 001' THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 I' SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EX- CEPTING 'THE EAST 560.0 FEET, AND, THE NORTH 96 fEET FOR CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND LESS THE RIGHT-OF·WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TO- GETHERWITH: , THE WEST 520.0 FEET OF THE EAST 560.0 FEET OF , THE SOUTH .1/201' THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 FEET AND TH£ NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WAy'AND THE CERTAIN PAR· CEL CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST" LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI· DA. FILED FOR RECORD, OCTOBER 12. 1988 IN O. R. B. 607, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LU- CIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT- ING THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN O.R.B. 1098, PAGE 1842. AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI- Lo~tlon: North side of Edwards Road, appro"i- mately 650 feet west of South 25th Street. Tuesday, May 2, 2006 5. TAILERS' COVE DEVELOPMENT, LLC fora Change in Zoning from the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District to thè PUD (Planned Unit Development - Tailers' Cove) Zon- Ing District, and Preliminary and Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the follow· T~~g~~~b:&r~W'rl~~ PARCEL G. F.E. ENGLER'S PLAT OF SURVEY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, AT PAGE 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LYING WEST OF STATE ROAD A·l:A. . ' , Location: West side of South SR A+A, directly açross from Atlantis I Condomlnlúms 6. CHARLES AND PEGGY WARD for a Change In Zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Fami- ly ".,2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR . 1 (A~r' icultural, Residential . 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the following described property: 13 35S 39£ 13 35)9 N 112 OF N 1/2 OF S 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 -LESS W 2 AC OF SO N 112 OF S 1/2 OF NE 1/401' HE 1/4 AND LESS E 550.01 FT - (1.92 AC) (OR 1000·81: 1005·2109: 1204-1397) 13 355 39E 13 35 39 W 510.01 FT OF E 55O.01FT OF N 112 OF N 1/2 OF 5 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 (1.93 AC) (OR 52&1343, 1344: 1017-2312': 1204-1398) Location: 1245 South Jenkins Road, Fort Pierce, Florida. 7. JOHN WARD for a Change in Zoning from the RS ·2 (Residential. Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zon· Ing District to the AR - 1 (Agricultural, Residen- tial . 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the following described property: ' THE PARCEL CONTAINED WITHIN: THE SOUTH, 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF, TAE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THE WEST 2 ACRES OF THE SAID NORTH 112 Of THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4' OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 'OF SEC- TION 13, TOWNSHIP 36 SQUTH. RANGE 39 EAST, ALSO LESS' AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM, ROAD RIGHT· OF-WAY. , ' , , Location: ,1275 South Jenkins Road, Fort Pierce, Florlela. " " The PUBLIC HEARING on this Item will be held In the Commission Chambers. Roger Poitras An- nex, 3rd Floor, St. Lucie County Administration Bullding,,2300Vlrgl~nla Avenue, Fort Pierce, flori- da on May 16. 2006, beginning at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. Action can be tak- en at this ineetlnga or the Item can be continued to a future date an time. All Interested persons will be gillen an opportuni·, , ty to be heard. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be con- sidered. Written comments to the Board of County Commissioners should be received by the Growth Management Department -, Planning Division at least 3 dal/s prior to the, scheduled hearing. 'The petition file 15 available for review at thll Growth'Management Department offices located at 2300 Vlrplnla Avenue" Fort Pierce, Florida. Please cal 772/462-2822 If you have any questions or require additional Information. The file for this project may be Inspected prior to the hearing date In the Growth Management Department. 2300 'Virginia Avenue, 2nd~ Floor, i Fort Pierce Florida. " , " The St. Lucie County Board of County Commis- sioners has the power to ,review and grant any applications within their area of responsibility. The proceedings of the Board of County Commis- sioners are electronically recorded. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105. Florida Statutes, If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record ,of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need, to ensure that a verbatim record of tile proceedings 15 made, which record Includes tile testimony and evi- dence upon which the appeal 15 to be based. Upon the request of any partY to the proceed- Ing. Individuals testifying durrng a hearing will be swøm In. Any party to the, proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any lndivldual testifying during a hearing upon request. If It becomes necessary, a public hear- Ing may be continued froni time to time as may be necessary, to a date-certain. .', Anyone with a disability requiring accommoda- tion to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least fortY.elght (48) hou~ prior to the meet- Ing at 7721462-lm or T.D.D. 7721462-1428. ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA IS/ DOUG COWARD, CHAIRMAN PUBLISH DATE: May 2, 2006 Publish: May 2, 2006 1384761 Sir, May 2, 2006 My only comment is about the traffic situation (especially in season) on Ocean Boulevard which is a two lane road. You can't pullout due to so many cars. I assume the land was zoned for less density for which the road was designed. Why penalize us. . David & Patricia Piskura 10044 Ocean Blvd. #1204 Jensen Beach, FL ~~, ~ ~'.~ ~",i! :n: W ~ ~ t ~~A' \1 '.J ')006 ~ "... IVI ¡ M <1 t... ..11"""""'---"'_""'~ _. ~'~',"" ''f'''''''''' ,'.., '........ . - Rece\ved By Growth Management f f , t AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. Sß DATE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [x ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Katherine Mackenzie-Smith Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 06-013 - Amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by Amending Section 10.01.14 to Provide for an Administrative Variance Procedure for Minimum Yard Setback in any Existing Mobile Home Park . BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION CONCLUSION: No specific action is required by the Board at this time. This meeting is for the purpose of accepting public comments and testimony and providing any direction to amend or otherwise modify this draft ordinance. The second public hearing is scheduled for June 6, 2006. [ ] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [X] OTHER: No specific action is required by the Board at this time. E: COMMISSION ACTION: Dougla . Anderson County Administrator [X] County Attorney: ir~ . Review and Approvals ]Management & Budget: [ ]Purchasing: [ ] Road & Bridge.: [ ) Parks & Recreation Director [ ] Solid Waste Mgr [ ]Finance:(check for copy only, if applicable) Effective 5/96 INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM COUNTY ATTORNEYS OFFICE ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Katherine Mackenzie-Smith, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 06-788 DATE: May 4, 2006 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 06-013 - Amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by Amending Section 10.01.14 to Provide for an Administrative Variance Procedure for Minimum Yard Setback in any Existing Mobile Home Park BACKGROUND: The 2004 and 2005 hurricanes destroyed structures in existing mobile home parks. Mobile home owners are attempting to pull permits to replace these structures. The County has been unable to issue numerous permits, as the structure will not meet the minimum setback requirements. For mobile home parks developed prior to 1990, the minimum setbacks are: 1. Front - 10 feet 2. Rear - 15 feet 3. Side - Mobile homes will be separated from each other and other structures by at least fifteen (15) feet. Historically, mobile home owners have been allowed to pull permits for structures with only a plot plan. Surveys have not been required. [Examples are attached.] This has generated problems in most mobile home parks. The County h-as started to send out inspectors where it has conflicting measurements on file. However, some mobile home owners are not able to replace destroyed structures¡ as the replacement structures cannot meet the minimum required setbacks. Predominately, the problem has arisen in the fifteen (15) feet structure to structure setbacks. Currently, Building and Zoning is only allowed to do administrative variances from minimum required setbacks for recreational vehicle parks. The cost of the petition is fifty ($50.00) dollars. Any petition for a variance from the minimum required setbacks for a mobile home park must go to the Board of Adjustment. The cost of a petition to the Board of Adjustment is five hundred ($500.00) dollars. The Fire Department has reviewed and approved the changes. Ordinance No. 06-013 would provide for a procedure for an administrative variance for minimum yard setbacks in any existing mobile home park. The ordinance would allow the Building Code Administrator to grant a requested variance of by no more than two-thirds of the required minimum standard in any existing mobile home park. RECOMM ENDATION I CONCLUSION: No specific action is required by the Board at this time. This meeting is for the purpose of accepting public comments and testimony and providing any direction to amend or otherwise modify this draft ordinance. The second public hearing will be on June 6, 2006. Respectfully submitted, /~( --, Katherine Mackenzie-Smith Assistant County Attorney KMS/cb ORDINANCE NO. 06-013 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 10.01.14 TO PROVIDE FOR AN ADMINISTRATIVE V ARIANCE PROCEDURE FOR MINIMUM YARD SETBACK IN ANY EXISTING MOBILE HOME PARK; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND CODIFICATION AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. This Board is authorized by Section 125.01(1)(h), Florida Statutes (2005), to establish, coordinate and enforce zoning and such business regulations as are necessary for the protection of the public; and, 2. This Board is authorized by Section 125.01(1)(t) to adopt ordinances and resolutions necessary for the exercise of its powers and to prescribe fines and penalties for the violations of ordinances in accordance with law; 3. On August 1, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, adopted the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 4. The Board of County Commissioners has adopted certain amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, through the following Ordinances: 91-03 - March 14, 1991 91-09 - May 14, 1991 91-21 - November 7, 1991 92-17 - June 2, 1992 93-01 - February 16, 1993 93-03 - February 16, 1993 93-05 - May 25, 1993 93-06 - May 25, 1993 93-07 - May 25, 1993 94-07 - June 22, 1994 94-18 - August 16, 1994 94-21 - August 16, 1994 95-01 - January 10, 1995 96-10 - August 6, 1996 97-01 - March 4, 1997 97 -09 - October 7, 1997 97 -03 - September 2, 1997 99-01 - February 2, 1999 99-02 - April 6, 1999 99-03 - August 17, 1999 Strl:Je:11 tkFðl:Jgk passages are deleted, Underlined passages are added. 99-04 - 99-15 - 99-17 - 00-1 0 - 00-12 - 01-03 - 02-09 - 02-29 - 04-02- 04-33- 05-03- 05-07- 05-23- August 17, 1999 July 20, 1999 September 7, 1999 June 13, 2000 June 13, 2000 December 18, 2001 March 5, 2002 October 15, 2002 January 20, 2004 December 7,2005 August 2, 2005 January 18, 2005 September 20,2005 99-05 - 99-16 - 99-18 - 00-11 - 00-13 - 02-05 - 02-20 - 03-05 - 04-07- 05-01- 05-04- 05-16- July 20, 1999 July 02, 1999 November 2, 1999 June 13, 2000 June 13, 2000 June 24, 2002 October 15, 2002 October 7,2003 April 20, 2004 March 15, 2005 August 2,2005 August 16, 2005 5. On April 20,2006, the Local Planning Agency/Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance after publishing notice in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune at least 10 days prior to the hearing and recommended that the proposed ordinance be approved. 6. On May 16, 2006, this Board held its first public hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune on May 5,2006. 7. On , this Board held its second public hearing on ,the proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune on 8. The proposed amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code are consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and are in the best interest of the health, safety and public welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: P ART A. The specific amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to read as follows, include: Stpl:Jel< thp6I:Jgh passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. 2 CHAPTER X VARIANCES 10.00.00 NONCONFORMITIES 10.01.14 ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCES FOR THE REQUIRED MINIMUM YARD SETBACK STANDARDS FOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS A. FOR RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS A 1. APPLICATION PROCEDURES 1- g. A person desiring to decrease any required minimum yard setback in any existing Recreational Vehicle Park on the effective date of this Ordinance (Ordinance 94- 007) by no more than fifty (50) percent of the minimum standard shall apply for a variance on a form provided by the Public \Norks Dir£ctor Building Code Administrator or his designee. 2- .12.. An application fee in accordance with Section 11.12.00. 3- ,Ç,. The application shall be in such a form and contain such information and documentation as shall be prescribed from time to time by the Public \Norks Dir£ctor Building Code Administrator or his designee, but shall contain at least the following: ct 1. Name and address of applicant. b ~. Legal description of the property which is subject of the application. e-ª.. Size of the subject property. d 1.. A certified boundary survey for the subject property showing the location of the proposed RV, Mobile Home, or Single Family Residence, along with all setback and distance measurements to all adjacent structures, site improvements and utility services. e 2. In those cases where the application submitted is for a variance from the requirements of Section 7.10.16(Q)(2), proof that the existing structure(s) on the Strl:lel( thrðl:lgh passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. 3 adjacent property(ies) is the cause for this application. The applicant must show that the adjacent structure(s) were constructed without the proper Local Government permits or in violation of those permits and as a result of the provisions of Section 7.10.16(Q)(2) has subsequently been granted existing nonconforming status. ' 4 Q. Within a reasonable period of time, not to exceed thirty (30) days after receipt of an application or receipt of additional information pursuant to this Section, the Public Works Director Building Code Administrator or his designee shall examine the application or information submitted and notify the applicant of apparent errors or omissions, and request such additional information as may be necessary for the processing of the application. §~. Within thirty (30) working days after an application has been determined to be complete, the Public \Norks Director Building Code Administrator or his designee. shall either grant the variance, grant the variance with conditions or deny the variance with reasons clearly stated. 6- t. Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Public Works Director Building Code Administrator or his designee. may appeal the decision within thirty (30) days after the rendition of such decision to the Board of Adjustment pursuant to procedures set forth in Section 11.11.00 of this Code. B g. GENERAL STANDARDS FOR ISSUANCE The Public Works Director Building Code Administrator or his designee. shall grant the requested variance if all of the applicable following standards are satisfied: ! g. Demonstration that the Recreational Vehicle Park was in legal existence upon the effective date of this Ordinance (Ordinance No. 94-007). ~.Q. Demonstration that the existing structure(s) on the adjacent properties have been constructed without, or in violation or, prior permit approvals and that these violations have been granted conforming status consistent with Section 7.10.16(Q)(2) of this Code. 3-,Ç. Demonstration that the placement of the proposed structure will meet the intent of all separation standards as required for all Recreational Vehicle Parks, Mobile Home parks, any other applicable provision of this Code, or the Standard Building Code Florida 5tFl:Jel\ thF8I:Jgh passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. 4 Building Code. fire code(s) and that the requested variance is the minimum necessary to locate the proposed dwelling unit of the property. 4 d. The literal application of the provisions of Section 7.10.16(Q) will result in an undo hardship on the property owners and would otherwise prohibit the use of the petitioned property as others are used in the surrounding neighborhood. § ~. The variance requested will not result in any encroachment into any access/utility easement or other common area. 6 t. The variance requested does not result in an encroachment of any more than fifty (50) percent into any required yard setback area. 7- g. The variance requested will not conflict with any other provision of this Code. G ~. CONDITIONS ON VARIANCES The Public Works Director Building Code Administrator or his designee. shall attach such conditions, limitations and requirements to the variance as are necessary to effectuate the purpose of this section. B. FOR MOBILE HOME PARKS 1 APPLICA TION PROCEDURES a. APPLICA TION PROCEDURES A person desiring to decrease any required minimum yard setback in any existing Mobile Home Park by replacing a pre-existing structure after the effective date of this Ordinance (Ordinance 06-013) by no more than two-thirds of the minimum standard shall apply for a variance on a form provided by the Building Code Administrator or his designee. b. An application fee in accordance with Section 11.12.00. c. The application shall be in such a form and contain such information and documentation as shall be prescribed from time to time by the Building Code Administrator or his designee. or his designee. but shall contain at least the following: Strl:lt!l tnr61:1gh passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. 5 1. Name and address of applicant. £ Legal description of the property which is subject of the application. ~ Size of the subject property. 4. A certified boundary surveyor a scaled plot plan. as deemed necessary by the Building Code Administration or his designee for the subject property showing the location of the proposed Mobile Home and any accessory structure. or Single Family Residence and any accessory structure. along with all setback and distance measurements to all adjacent structures. site improvements and utility services. d. Within a reasonable period of time. not to exceed thirty (30) days after receipt of an application or receipt of additional information pursuant to this Section. the Building Code Administrator or his designee. shall examine the application or information submitted and notify the applicant of apparent errors or omissions. and request such additional information as may be necessary for the processing of the application. e. Within thirty (30) working days after an application has been determined to be complete. the Building Code Administrator or his designee shall either grant the variance. grant the variance with conditions or deny the variance with reasons clearly stated. L Any person aggrieved by a decision of the Building Code Administrator or his designee may appeal the decision within thirty (30) days after the rendition of such decision to the Board of Adjustment pursuant to procedures set forth in Section 11.11.00 of this Code. 2. GENERAL STANDARDS FOR ISSUANCE The Building Code Administrator or his designee shall grant the requested variance if all of the applicable following standards are satisfied: a. Demonstration that the Mobile Home Park was in legal existence upon the effective date of this Ordinance (Ordinance No. 06-013). Stpl:lel( tkpel:lgk passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. 6 b. Demonstration that the placement of the proposed structure will meet the intent of all separation standards as required for all Mobile Home parks. any other applicable provision of this Code. Florida Building Codes or the fire code(s) and that the requested variance is the minimum necessary to locate the proposed structure on the property. c. Demonstrate that a similar structure existed on the subject property at the proposed location of the new structure on the effective date of this Ordinance (Ordinance No. 06-013.) d. Demonstration that the placement of the proposed structure. if a mobile home. will not be located closer than 10 ft (3 m) side to side. 8 ft (2.4 m) end to side. or 6 ft (1.8 m) end to end horizontally from any other mobile home. manufactured home. single family detached dwelling or community building unless the exposed composite walls and roof of either structure are without openings and constructed of materials that will provide a l-hour fire rating or the structures are separated by a l-hour fire-rated barrier. e. Demonstration that the placement of the proposed structure. if an accessory structure. if located immediately adjacent to a site line is constructed entirely of materials that do not support combustion and provided that such buildings or structures are not less than 3 ft (0.9 m) from an accessory building or structure on an adjacent site. An accessory building or structure constructed of combustible materials shall be located no closer than 5 ft (1.5 m) from the site line of an adjoining site. e.f. The literal application of the provisions of the Code for required minimum yard setback will result in an undo hardship on the property owners and would otherwise prohibit the use of the petitioned property as others are used in the surrounding neighborhood. ,f.:.g The variance requested will not result in any encroachment into any access/utility easement or other common area. h. The variance requested will not conflict with any other provision of this Code. ª-. CONDITIONS ON VARIANCES The Building Code Administrator or his designee shall attach such conditions. Strl:Jel( tnrol:Jgk passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. 7 limitations and requirements to the variance as are necessary to effectuate the purpose of this section. PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY . If any portion of thi.s ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable in the unincorporated area of St. Lucie County. PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART F. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. PART G. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward Vice Chairman Chris Craft Commissioner Joseph E. Smith xxx XXX XXX StFl:ld( tkFðtlgh passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. 8 Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx XXX PART H. CODIFICA TION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through H shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this _ day of ,2006. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS County Attorney Strl:Jé:h tkrel:Jgh passages are deleted. Underlined passages are added. 9 ~~!OI'ªish9é :}'\pr~?º:P. ~Z ):TífÚ re9;d~ò,~':ºj) ,. Pa From: To: Date: Subject: Sharon Erven Carol Bishop 5/4/2006 10:38:48 AM April 20 P & Z min re Ord 06-013 Agenda Item #1 Ordinance # 06-013. This is to provide for an Administrative Variance Procedure for minimum yard setback in any existing mobile home park. Katherine MacKenzie-Smith, Assistant County Attorney, stated currently the building official has discretion to issue administrative variances in recreational vehicle parks but he did not have the ability to issue administrative variances in a mobile home park. Further she stated since the hurricanes permits have been received to rebuild previously existing carports which are not within the required setbacks, therefore, they cannot be rebuilt. There has been input from the fire department to assure fire safety and they support the administrative variance procedure. Otherwise the only procedure available to the homeowner would be to go to the board of adjustments. The current setbacks are 15 feet structure to structure. This variance would give the ability for up to 10 feet. Recommendation is that this is passed to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Mr. Grande stated that it seems that the only significant difference between RVs and mobile homes is the 2/3 variance vs. the 50% variance. Is a different variance for each of those categories needed and is a separate section for each of those categories necessary. Attorney MacKensie-Smith stated the difference is in the amount of variance that the building official has and also on pg 7 -2 d & e where the distance is, that is not in the RV variance and those were the specific sections that were requested by the fire dept. Chairman Hearn stated on pg 5 B-1-a, it references the variance of no more than 2/3 of the minimum standard and on pg 7 H references 33%. Mr. Grande stated that H, 1/3 is the amount that is remaining after the variance is allowed up to 2/3rds, not to encroach into that 1/3 that is allowed to be left. Mr. Grimm, building official, provided further explanation to Chairman Hearn stating Mr. Grande's explanation is correct. He further stated it is allowed to go to 10ft instead of the 15 ft. There is a play of 1/3 with 2/3. At least 2/3 will be needed for the set back to be in compliance and allowed to go 1/3 into the required set back. Chairman Hearn stated the public hearing will be opened. Roy Bruers, Spanish Lakes One Community has been approached by many of the folks of this community regarding the variance requirements and cost of the variance. The folks of the community do not own the property therefore the owner of the land should bear the cost of the variance application. Some of the folks have not gotten their carports repaired from the previous hurricanes. These homes have been here for the last 30 years as well as the previous foot prints. Why wasn't this code discovered in those previous years. Now after all the hurricanes and the added expense because of the hurricanes, the home owner's are faced with the cost of the variance. The safety issue is understood requiring the fire department to get in between the units in case of a fire. A suggestion to resolve that situation is, if code enforcement finds someone who is not built back to the original footprint and have since extended, then they need to address those individuals who are not in compliance. Mr. Grande asked who is responsible for the cost of the variance application, the land owner or the home owner. Attorney MacKensie-Smith stated the person who is applying for the variance application would bear the cost. Mr. Grande further asked if they are building back to what existed previous to the event, the hurricane etc, that destroyed the property, is a variance still required or is it grandfathered to what was there before. Attorney MacKensie-Smith stated that they grandfathered the ones that can be proven that they were in before. Mr. Grande stated that in the specific case where someone is rebuilding in place where it was legal before but does not comply with the current setback requirements, are they required to pay for a variance or are those being grandfathered in? Attorney MacKensie-Smith replied if it was still the 15 ft setback before and now it is not, then yes they would have to have the variance for whatever reason. Chairman Hearn stated the public hearing is closed. Mr. Grande stated it is moved that this petition be passed to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation for approval with the amendments that have been brought up this evening as it meets the needs of the county. Mr. Mundt seconded the motion. Ms. Hammer stated that this petition was to make the variance process faster and easier so it would not have to go through a full zoning board and to give the building code administrator the ability to grant the variance from their desk instead of the whole process. Attorney MacKensie-Smith replied that is correct and it will be cheaper. Roll Call Mr. Grande - Yes to approve Mr. Mundt - Yes Ms. Caron - Yes Ms. Hammer Yes Ms. Morgan - Yes Chairman Hearn - Yes with reservations This ordinance was approved unanimously. ~ r Agenda Request Item Number: Meeting Date: Sê. May 16, 2006 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Growth Management Presented By Bob Nix ~ 6~ Growth Management Director Consider Ordinance 06-026 adopting the request by Charles Sabin, Sabin Companies, Inc., for a small scale change in future land use designation for an 8.9 acre parcel located northwest of the intersection of Edwards Road and 25th Street, from Commercial (COM) land use to RM (Residential Medium) land use. (File Number: PA-05-011) SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: . Applicant's reasons for request: To facilitate planning and development of a residential community in this transitional location of the County; . Staff findings: Site meets criteria for Residential Medium compared with the neàrby lands in the County. The medium intensity is transitional from the east high intensity and lower intensity west, north and southwest. There is an adjacent commercial use east of the subject area for current and future residents to shop for convenience items. There are commercial, government and recreation centers within two miles of the site. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A RECOMMENDATION: At the Local Planning Agency (LPA) meeting on April 20, 2006, after a Public Hearing with many comments both for and against, the LPA voted 4-2 to recommend that the Board of County-Commissioners approve and adopt the amendment. Staff recommends that the BOCC pass Ordinance 06-026 thereby adopting the Amendment. PREVIOUS ACTION: COMMISSION ACTION: DO APPROVED c=J OTHER Approved 5-0 D DENIED Coordination/Signatures County Attorney Finance: Environ. Resources; I~ Mgt. & Budget: Fire Dept: Utility: Purchasing: Public Works: Other: PA 05-011 Transmittal Master Checklist Primarv Distribution Sent Received Environmental Resources Department, Vanessa Bessey X X Public Works, Don'West X Surveyor - Ron Harris: X X Road, Bridge, & Transportation - Scott Herring: Stormwater Management - Chris Lestrange: General Engineering - Kyle Croce: Zoning Supervisor - Paula Bushby: Attorney:Prop Acquisition - JoAnn Riley: X X Sheriffs Department - Major Monahan: St Lucie County Fire District - Captain Derek Foxx: St. Lucie County MPO X X Ft Pierce FarmslNorth St Lucie Water Control District , , - Ray Garcia: Property Appraiser's Office - Maurice Snyder: IF AS - Jeffrey Gellermann: , Residential Only School Board of St Lucie County - Marty Sanders: X x Community Services (Transit) - Jody Bonet: Geoe:raDhical Based St Lucie County Utility Department - Airport Authority - Diana Lewis: City ofFt Pierce - BeachIRecor: X X City of Port St Lucie - Cheryl Friend: Ft Pierce Utilities Authority - David Mellert: X X Local Planning Agency - May 16, 2006 File Number PA-05-011 MEMORANDUM GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Larry Szynkowski, Senior Planne~ THROUGH: David P. Kelly, Planning Manager THROUGH: Bob Nix, Growth Management Director ~ (;17- DATE: May 1, 2006 SUBJECT: Application of Sabin Companies, Inc. for a Small Scale Change in Future and Use Designation from COM (Commercial) to RM (Residential Medium, Maximum 9 du/acre) Ordinance 06-026 LOCATION: North side of Edwards Road, approximately 500 feet west of 25th Street (Please see attached petition map showing subject parcels) CURRENT FUTURE LAND COM (Commercial) USE DESIGNATION: PROPOSED FUTURE LAND RM-Residential Medium (Residential Medium Maximum USE DESIGNATION: 9 du/acre EXISTING ZONING: RS-4 (Residential, Single Family 4 du/acre) PROPOSED ZONING: Planned Unit Development PARCEL SIZE: 8.9 acres EXISTING USE Vacant PROPOSED USE: Townhouse Residential 9 du/acre SURROUNDING FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS: RU (Residential Urban-5 du/acre) to the northwest; RM (Residential Medium) to the north and south; COM (CommerciaJ) to the east. To the west i& the May 16, 2006 Page 2 Petition: Orchid Place FLUM Amendment File Number: PA-05-011 from COM to RM SURROUNDING ZONING ' DESIGNATIONS: SURROUNDING EXISTING LAND USES: UTILITY SERVICE: City of Fort Pierce, R-L Residential Low Land Use with a maximum 6.5 du/acre. PUD (Planned Unit Development) to the north and soùth; CG (Commercial General) to the east. To the west is property within the City of Fort Pierce , which is presently designated R-1 Residential with a maximum 4 du/acre. Duplexes to the northwest; A 3-acre County drainage pond and an Adult Congregate Living Facility, Lake Forest Park. Fort Pierce to the north; To the east, vaèant land with a proposed self-storage facility and a gas station at the intersection with 25th Street; To the south is vacant land that has a Future Land Use of RM- Residential Medium and an approved PUD for 318 residential units; To the west, the land was annexed to the City of Fort, Pierce wÜh a proposed 40.96 acres of residential development as Edwards Preserve. The subject property is within the Ft. Pierce Utility Service Area (FPUA). The areas around the property are serviced by FPUA. The applicant will request that FPUA approve a Utilities Capacity Agreement for the project. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS: RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: The existing right-of-way ,width at Edwards at this location is 75 feet. The proposed right-at-way width of Edwards Road is 120 feet. A proposed entrance on Edwards Road with right turn lane westbound and a left turn lane eastbound. A 6-foot sidewalk the length of the development and a bus stop shelter, both on the north side of Edwards Road. Concurrency Deferral Affidavit. **************************************************************************************************** A future land use amendment is not regarded as a development order as defined in. Frorida Statutes and does not imply that any specific development scenario can occur May 16, 2006 Page 3 Petition: Orchid Place FLUM Amendment File Number: PA-05-011 from COM to RM on the property. No right to obtain a final development order, or any other rights to develop the subject property are granted or implied by the County, if the requested Comprehensive Plan amendment is approved. ......................................................................... DATA AND ANALYSIS BACKGROUND The site's existing COM Future Land Use designation would presently accommodate any of the commercial zoning districts identified in the St. Lucie County Land Development Regulations. Although the predominant commercial uses are general retail and office, the permitted uses could include automobile dealers, retail drug stores, armored car services, mobile home dealers, and veterinary services. . The proposed Future Land Use classification.RM (Residential Medium) "is to be applied to areas that are within, or planned to be within, areas of central community services." The existing zoning i.s RS-4 (Residential, Single Family 4 DUlAcre) which is intended to accommodate Single Family Residential. This zoning is not consistent with the parcel's future land use designation. The surrounding Future Land Use designations' are summarized above and shown on the attached Future Land Use Map (See "Exhibit J, Existing Future Land Use Map") showing adjacent Future Land Use designations: RU, RM and COM. The subject site is now vacant. (See Exhibit I, "Surrounding Area Uses Exhibit.") The property to the north is identified as. Lake Forest Park, an Adult Congregate Living Facility. The property to the south across Edwards Road is vacant and proposed to be the residential FronterÇl PUD with 318 dwelling units. The property to the east is vacant , and proposed as a self-storage facility and there ~s a gas station at the intersection with 25th Street Further east is the Laurel Professional Park. The City of Fort Pierce annexed land to the west as R-1 (4 du/acre) and is considering a residential development to be known as "Edwards Preserve." **************************************************************************************************** APPLICANT PROPOSAL AND REASONS FOR REQUEST The applicant requests a land use amendment to Residential Medium be adopted into the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and shown on the map as a Residential Medium Designation. The applicant provides the following reasons for the request: "On the St. Lucie County Land Use and Zoning maps the subject property is designated as Commercial future land use and RS-4 (Residential, Single-family-4du/acre) zoning classification. According to Table 1-3, Land Use Designation/Zoning Compa~ibility Matrix, the RS-4 Zoning Classification is not compatible with the Commercial land· use designation. The existing pattern of development along Edwards Road consists of medium density residential at the intersection of Edwards Road and 25th Street. The existing roadway configuration of Edwards Road does not lend itself, to high intensi~ commercial development at this corner. The intersection of Edwards Road and 25t Street currently has a southbound divided turn lane which is offset from the through- May 16, 2006 Page 4 Petition: Orchid Place FLUM Amendment File Number: PA-05-011 from COM to RM lanes viabollards placed within the right-of-way. At the west end of the property Edwards Road has a.strong curve which goes toward the south before leveling back into a westerly pattern. This creates a blind curve just before the intersection of Edwards Road and 25th Street. We are requesting that the 8.,9 acre parcel of land be designated with an RM (Residential Medium) future land use designation keeping it in line with the current development pattern and densities within the area. The property immediately to the south was recently designated with an RM (Residential Medium) future land use designation. " Note: The applicant states that Edwards Road and 25th Street intersection has medium density, multiple family residential. There are currently two commercial corners and two vacant corners. STAFF FINDINGS The following combine the comments of staff: 1. The Intent of the Residential Medium Future Land Use designation, according to the Future Land Use Element of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, is to "... be applied to those areas that are within, or planned to be within, areas of central community serVices. A maximum residential density of nine dwellings per acre is permitted under this land use designation. The actual density is subject to the satisfactory completion of the rezoning process, which would include complete review of the physical suitability of the property for development at the proposed intensity." The application of Residential Medium should follow the intent of, the land use category. The RM would be applicable with a Commercial use abutting it thereby meeting the intent. The existing commercial services to the east at the corner(Edwards Rd. & 25th St.) are a gas station, convenience store and pizza place. A proposed use of self-storage would abut the subject property on the east just north and west of the above noted businesses. 2. The Housing Element of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan encourages housing for the workforce. While there is no formal "Affordability" component to this amendment, several factors that lead to affordability apply to this property. The land is vacant so there are no demolition costs. The land was purchased prior to the land cost increases of the early 2000's. The Fort, Pierce Utilities are located in the area and are available for this project. The applicant, Sabin Companies, will apply for these utilities. Therefore, the end product could be ' affordable compared to other properties in the County. 3. the land abutting to the west is located iF') the City of Fort Pierce. There are municipal areas within a mile to the north, east and southwest. It is likely that in the future this area will be located in the City. 4. The applicant's consultant used the ITE Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition Code 230 for Residential CondominiumslTownhouses. The traffic analysis compares the anticipated trips from the subject property if the use would continue as a commercial property with anticipated trips if the property would change to an Residential Medium intensity. Per their analysis, the existing high intensity commercial would create a higher volume of trips than the proposed number of May 16, 2006 Page 5 Petition: Orchid Place FLUM Amendment File Number: PA-05-011 from COM to RM multiple family units would create. The analysis states that the residential use would add Average Daily Traffic of 531 Vehicles per Day with a Peak P. M. Hour of 50. These added vehicles would not lower the Level of Service of the Road/Street into the next level category in any direction. Therefore, consideration of Residential Medium is acceptable. ....~~.................-..............................-.................... CONSISTENCY WITH THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN In reviewing this application for a proposed amendment to the St. Lucie County Future Land Use Map, staff finds that the following Intent statement and Goals, Objectives and Policies of the County Comprehensive Plan area applicable to this petition. FUTURE LAND USE ELEMENT The proposed amendment appears to support and further this element. According to the Future Land Use Element of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan the Intent of The Residèntial Medium Future Land Use permits a residential maximum density of nine dwellings per acre. The actual density is subject to the satisfactory completion of the rezoning process, which would include complete review of the physical suitability of the property for development at the .proposed intensity. Medium density residential land uses can act as a transition between lower intensity RU area and the more intense land use designations. Zoning applications within RM land use include single-family, multi-family, or PUD zoning. The land use designation in this area that is more intense is the commercial to the east and along 25th Street. There is an RM land use to the northeast and to the south. A less dense residential Zoning District R-1 exists on the abutting property to the west in the City of Fort Pierce. " OBJECTIVE 1.1.5: In coordination with the other elements of this plan,future development within the ·Planned Urban Service Area 'shall be directed to areas where urban and community services/facilities can be provided in the most efficient and compact manner so as to discourage the proliferation of urban sprawl. The proposed amendment directs development activities into an area of the county already intended to be provided with urban infrastructure such as water and sewer, therefore being consistent with this Objective. Urban sprawl is discouraged by the proposed amendment's location in the urban service area and its close proximity to facilities. Policy 1.1.5.3: When considering any amendment to the Future Land Use Maps of the County's Comprehensive Plan, the County Commission shall make the following findings, supported by the other elements of this Plan, prior to taking any approval actions granting an individual amendment to the Future Land Use Maps: May 16, 2006 Page 6 Petition: Orchid Place FLUM Amendment File Number: PA-05-011 from COM to RM 1. That the property under land use amendment application is adjacent to, or within no more than Y4 mile of the same or greater type of land use classification. The site of the proposed RM Residential Medium Future Land Use classification is presently within X mile of land with: Residential Medium contiguous to the, south, northeast and further to the east beyond the abutting CommerCial land use; 2. That the ,property under land use management consideration lies within the Five Year Capital Improvement Program of the Water and Wastewater Master Plan for St. Lucie County or otherwise meets the requirements of Policy 1.1.5.4. The Fort Pierce Utilities Authority is the utility provider in this area. Objective 1.1.7: Future development... activities shall be directed to those areas depicted with urban land use designations on the Future Land Use Map and are to be consistent with sound planning principles contained in- the goals, objectives and policies oHhis pial:!. The subject site is within the Urban Service Area -and - has the future land use designation of Commercial (COM). The proposed land use amendment can enable the site to develop with Residential Multiple-Family-9 du/acre along with 3% commercial. Residential Multiple-Family-9 du/acre supports this Objective by steering urban development to an area intended to accommodate such development. Policy 1.1.7.1 Continue to support and encourage innovative land use development patterns _ through adequate provision in the County's Land Development Regulations including Planned Unit Developments (PUDS)... The applicant has applied for a Planned Unit Development (Orcl:tid Place PUD) for the for the proposed amendment location. The Residential Medium designation allows the PUD innovative land use patterns. As part of the pròject design, the applicanf wiil be designing the residential components so as to connect, building to building. These buildings will form a courtyard, with patios overlooking landscape/garden areas. Policy 1.1.8.7: Eliminate future scattered and highway strip commercial development by encouraging the development of commercial center or nodes consistent with the Fufure Land Use Map. The proposed use minimizes commercial uses along Edwards Road thus preventing Retail Strip Development. Goal 1.2: Recognize that land use and transportation must be considered concurrently in all planning, and to the extent feasible, modify current land use patterns to decrease dependence on the automobile in order to minimize the need for future roadway expansion and promote the use of alternate modes of transportation. ' May 16, 2006 Page 7 Petition: Orchid Place FLUM Amendment File Number: PA-05-011 from COM to RM This amendment will include a transit stop at the southwest corner of the proposed development to allow access to office, institutional, light industrial and commercial uses that are within two (2) miles of proposed residential units. This added shelter contributes to the effort to decrease automobile trips through the use of alternate modes of transportation, such as public transP9rtation, thus supporting this Goal. TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT The proposed amendment has been determined not to conflict with this element. GOAL 2.1: Provide safe and efficient integrated multi-modal transportation system which addresses the future needs of St. Lucie County for movement of people and goods, and which considers social, economic, energy and environmental effects of the transportatíon system. The configuration of arterial roadways abutting the subject site denotes the site as an area conveying personal vehicles, commer.cial vehicles and public transit. The proposed land use amendment supports and furthers the implementation of this Goal by not only proposing to inç~ude a public transit shelter in the project, but by constructing sidewalks on the perimeter of the buildings and development. This amenity will enable pedestrians to access public transit safely. Policy 2.1.1: The St. Lucie County transportation system- shall be reviewed in coordination with any requested changes to the Future Land use Element or other related component of this plan. A report on the impacts to the system brought about by any proposed land use changes shall be prepared and presented to the Board of County Commissioners as part of the review of that Land Use change. The Traffic Impact Statement submitted was based on the ITE Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition- Code 230 for Residential Condominiumsrrownhouses. There are 80 dwelling units and the 94,000 square-foot self-storage proposed,abutting this property to the east. The applicant provided a traffic capacity analysis statement for the trips associated before the development and estimated the proposed development capacity. Thisarnendment would result in daily traffic of 531 more vehicles per day (vpd). This amendment will result ina proposed 319 veiiclesa day on Edwards Road traveling either westbound or eastbound into the 25th Street intersection. There will be' 212 vehicles added per day on 25th Street traveling north and south of Edwards Road. ' The consultant also analyzed whether roadways in the vicinity of the proposed project would be able to meet· their Levels of Service. The 2002 FDOT a/LOS Handbook was used and 5% was added per year for 2 years to the pre-development counts. The lane group Level of Service (LOS~ showed a decrease from E to F for eastbound left turn; a decrease of D to E for northbound left turn; a decrease from B to C for northbound through movement. Overall the Approach LOS remained the same for all four directions. Even though the Level of Service rating remains the same, road impacts must be , considered as the responsibility of the applicant. Road and Bridge Department review May 16,2006 Page 8 Petition: Orchid Place FLUM Amendment File Number: PA-05-011 from COM to RM The Road and Bridge Department staff comments indicated that since the Land Use amendment includes a concurrency deferral roadway concurrency would be determined with a formal development application. Additional information has been provided by the applicant with the application for the Planned Unit Development in order to determine whether a decrease in trips would occur, and what the actual impact on the roadway , system would be. St. Lucie Metropolitan Planning Organization review The St. Lucie Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) staff reviewed the proposed Land Use amendment and noted that it is not in conflict with the MPO's adopted 2025 Long Range Transportation Plan (LRTP). (Please see attached l&ttßr from the St. Lucie Metropolitan Planning Organization.) The MPO LRTP does identify as "congested roadways: · 25th Street from Virginia Avenue south to Edwards Road; · Edwards Road from Jenkins Road east to Selvitz Road; · Jenkins Road from Graham Road south to Edwards; · Selvitz Road from Edwards Road south to Glades Cut-off Road. Upon IOq3ting the above roadways, there is congestion projected' on'this area's southbound roads which connect to Edwards Road to the west of this project (Selvitz Road and Jenkins Road). At those intersects, eastbound Edwards Road will also be congested. These projections are based on area-wide modeling with existing future land uses, not with the proposed land use. HOUSING ELEMENT The proposed amendmènt has been determined not to conflict with this element. Based on the general information and data provided, the proposed townhouses could be affordable to workforce buyers. There are no enforceable procedures as part of the amendment, but several factors exist related to this amendment that could lead to workforce affordability: 1. Land was obtained in 1995 when costs were lower 2. The land is vacant, so there are no demolition costs 3. Access is directly onto Edwards Road limiting road access costs 4. Property is in the Ft. Pierce Utility Service Area The applicant states generally that development costs can be spread over the higher number of units (80) allowed in the RM land use designation and PUD zoning. The benefits mentioned should also be spread over the number of future unit owners. INFRASTRUCTURE ELEMENT The applicant has provided documentation about the potential impacts on potable water, sanitary sewer, solid waste and drainage ·services. This analysis is provided to comply with the requirements of Rule 9J-11, Florida Administrative Code. The Fort Pierce Utility May 16, 2006 Page 9 Petitiòn: Orchid Place FLUM Amendment File Number: PA-05-011 from COM to RM authority has provided a letter indicating that the capacity is generally available but not committed at this time. . Potable Water Sub-Element The proposed amendment has been determined not to conflict with this sub-element. The subject property is within the Fort Pierce Utility Authority area. Prior to any Final Development Order approvals, the applicant would be required to provide more detailed information and to demonstrate that sufficient capacity is available to service the project. If the amendment is adopted as proposed, a maximum of 80 residential units at a projected 2.47 persons per unit, could be built. With 198 persons at a rate of 100 gallons per èapita per day, the potable water demand would be 19,800 gallons per day. . If the current Commercial Land Use would be built to the maximum creating 349 employees, 41 ,880 gallons/day would be needed for the site. The proposed Residential Medium land Use designation would reduce the need of potable water by 22,080 gallons ¡day. . Sanitary Sewer Sub-Element The proposed amendment has been determined not to conflict with this sub-element. The subject'property is within the FPUA Service area and FPUA that has stated that there is capacity within their system presently. A detailed application will be submitted to FPUA. , Policy 6D.1.2.3: The standards for level of servic, for sanitary sewer systems other than those owned and operated by Fort Pierce Utilities Authority shall be Permanent & Seasonal Residents - 85 gpcd; Employee - 102 gpcd and school student - 17 gpcd. Based on the allowed maximum lot coverage of 50% per Table 7-10 in the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, The subject property, with its current "Commercial" classificatipn having 598 square feet per emplòyee as recommended by the Florida Building Code, could possibly yield 349 employees. At a level of service of 102 gallons per capita per day for employee, the resulting daily demand would be 35,598. If the amendment is' adopted as proposed, there would be a maximum of 80 residential units. With a projected number of 198 persons, at a rate'of 85 gallons per capita per day, the wastewater generation rate would be 16,830 gallons/day. The total daily demand for wastewater treatment would be 18,768 gpd lower than that generated by the subject site with its current land use designation. May 16, 2006 Page 10 Petition: Orchid Place FLUM Amendment File Number: PA-05-011 from COM to RM . Solid Waste Sub-Element The proposed amendment is not in conflict with this sub-element and would not reduce the level of Service standards for the County's solid waste facility as set forth· by Policy 6B.1.·1.1. The level of service specified in that Policy is 9.31 pounds per capital per day. Assuming that the existing future land use designation would yield a maximum of 208,435 square feet of retail floor area (based on the maximum 50% lot coverage allowed in Commercial General zoning district), and that 598 square feet is needed per employee according to Florida Building Code the estimated number of employees would be 349 employees. At a level of service of 9.31 pounds per capita per day for employee, the resulting daily production' of solid waste would be estimated at 3,249 pounds per capita per day. Based" on the maximum residential Medium of 9 dwelling units per acre to be built. With a person per hóusehold rate of 2.47 (Census 2000), the residential wastewater generation would be 80 units X 2.47= 198 persons. At a rate of 9.31 pounds per capita per day, the solid waste generation rate would be 1,843 pounds per day. . Drainage and Aquifer Recharge Sub-Element The proposed amendment is not inconsistent with this sub-element. In accordance with Objective 6C.1.4.2 of this element, all development will be . conditioned on the ability of the design of the project to comply with stormwater management standards necessary to maintain the level of service standards for stormwatersét forth in Policy 6C.1.1 ;2. A letter of general compliance is provided by the SFWMD. Objective 6C.3.2 requires development to protect the functions of natural groundwater recharge areas. Existing wellfields are not located in proximity to this proposal, and are not anticipated to be impacted by this proposal. Prior to any final development order approvals, the applicant would provide more information, and would need to demol1strate compliance of all infrastructure with the levels of service. COASTAL MANAGEMENT ELEMENT The proposed amendment' has been determined not to conflict with this element. Th.e subject site is not located within the coastal planning area. CONSERVATION ELEMENT The proposed amendment has been determined not to conflict with this element. The applicant provided an Environmental Assessment of the subject property. The Environmental Assessment identified the presence of no environmental assets. May 16, 2006 Page 11 Petition: Orchid Place FLUM Amendment File Number: PA-05-011 from COM to RM RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE The proposed amendment has been determined not to conflict with this element because of requirements that will ensure that the project will' bear its fair share of the cosiof providing recreation and open space facilities. The current future land use designation of Commercial does not create a demand for recreational facilities. The proposed amendment will create a demand. Should the amendment be approved, the developer would be required to pay impact fees. The Level of Service for recreational facilities established in the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan is contained in Policy 9.1.1.1 of the Recreation and Open Space Element. Policy 9.1.1.1 Level of Service for Recreation and Open Space shall be as follows: . Community Parks: 5 acres/1000 residents in the unincorporated area . Regional parks: 5acres/1000 residents countywide. If the amendment is adopted, a maximum of 80 dwelling units are proposed. With a person per household rate of 2.47 (Census 2000), the total population is estimated as 198. The standard of 5 acres/1000 pòpulatiòn for community parks produces a demand of 1-acre of community park area to meet the needs of the proposed residents. The applicant states that there is a surplus of Community and Regional Parks. The value of an acre of park land could be contributed to the County by the applicant. Accordiñg to the information contained in Table 9-1 of the Recreation and Open Space Element of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, the total community park acreage is 1-60.3. The projected' unincorporated permanent resident population for 2005, according to the Recreation and Open Space Element, is 70,951, which would require a community park total acreage of 354.7 acres in order to meet adopted level of sarvice standards. With the current total acreage, the projected permanent population stands at a level of service of 2.3 acres/1000. ' FUrther according to Table 9-1 of the Recreation and Open Space Element, the County total Regional Park acreage is 7,069 acres. For Regional Parks,' the countywide population is used for establishing level of service. The projected 2005 population for the County as cited in this Element is 220,334. This equates to approximately 32 acres per 1000 persòns, which is well above the 5 acres per 1000 persons required as the level of service for Regional Parks. INTERGOVERNMENTAL COORDINATION ELEMENT It is recommended that a conclìtion be included in the resolution that requires an agreement between the applicant and the St. Lucie County School District for construction costs per unit as a voluntary contribution. In that case, the proposed amendment would not be· determined to conflict with this element. The project is in the Fort Pierce annexation area. The application was provided to the City for review. See attached comments. May 16, 2006 Page 12 Petition: Orchid Place FLUM Amendment File Number: PA-05-011 from COM to RM CAPIT ALIMPROVEMENT ELEMENT The proposed amendment has been determined not to conflict with this element. 11.1.1.28: The County shall continue to require new development to meet level of service standards for both on and off·site improvements, including local streets, water and sewer connection lines, Stormwater management facilities and open space. A Certificate of Capacity will be obtained before the issuance any final development orders for development of this property. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ELEMENT The proposed amendment changes Commercial Acreage of 8.9-Acres to Residential" Medium density. The Economic Development staff stated that the County should not be reducing commercial and industrial land. The property abutting to the east is commercial and is intended for self-storage. The Convenience Center in the immediate area at Edwards Road and 25th Street consists òf 2 gas stations,' 2 convenience stores ~d a small pizza place. A Convenience Center has a service demand radius of one mile. Neighborhood Centers with super market anchors are within a 2-mile radius (Okeechobee Road, US Highway #1). There was a Còmmercial Future Land Use south of this property changed to. Residential Medium in 2005. **************************************************************************************************** CONSISTENCY WITH THE STATE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed amendment supports and furthers the following Goals and Policies of the State Comprehensive Plan that apply to this petition: LAND USE 187.201(15), FS: (a) Goat In recognition of the importance of pres~rving the natural" resources and enhancing the quality of life of the state, development shall be directed to those areas which have in place, or have agreements to provide, the land and water resources, fiscal abilities, and'sèrvice capacity to accommodate growth in an environmentally acceptable manner. (b) Policies: 3. Enhance the livability and character of urban areas through the encouragement of an attractive and functionàl mix of living, working, shopping and recreational activities. The proposed amendment is located within the Urban Service area, at a location that will be receiving water and sewer lines. This will encourage development of an existing site that provides an alternative location for residential development that might otherwise seek a location beyond the Urban Service area. The residents can shop for convenience item adjacent to their homes. Residents can travel by bus or personal vehicle to work at May 16, 2006 Page 13 Petition: Orchid Place FLUM Amendment File Number: PA-05-011 from COM to RM the nearby county government or hospital facilities and work or to shop at neighborhood retail centers with super markets on US Highway 1 or Okeechobee Road. The St. Lucie County Lawnwood Park is located adjacent to the nearby government administration building. The lack of any endangered or protected species on site should help keep the project on schedule with the development process timeline. *****************************************************.********************************************** CONSISTENCY WITH THE STRATEGIC REGIONAL POLICY PLAN The proposed amendment relates to the following regional goals, strategies and polices that apply to this petition: Policy 6.1.1.1: New neighborhoods and communities should contain a balanced, well-planned, compatible mix of land uses appropriately located so that - State, local and regional goals are achieved. This petition will connect this 8.g-acre area as RM Medium Density with 9 du/acre to the existing RM Medium Density areas to the north and south with the same maximum density. This includes the RM (Residential Medium) south across Edwards Rçad with an approved pun for 318. dwelling units. There- are commercial areas for employment and shopping accessible on US Highway 1 and Okeechobee Road. There are county facilities on 25th Street available to residents for employment and services and a large county facility on Virginia Avenue available to the residents for recreation. ****************************************~******************************************************~**** CONCLUSION Based upon the information provided, staff has found the proposed land use change to be consistent with the Goals, Objectives and Policies as set forth in the County's Comprehensive Plan. ' Staff also finds the proposed amendment to be consistent with the State Comprehensive Plan and the Regio~al Policy Plan. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners adopt the Future Land Use change as a Small Scale Development Amendment and submit the Future Land Use Change to the State Department of Community Affairs. Attachment cc: County Administrator County Attorney File May 16,2006 Page 14 Petition: Orchid Place FLUM Amendment File Number: PA-05-011 from COM to RM Suggested motion to recommend approval/denial of this requested Small Scale Comprehensive Plan Amendment. MOTION TO APPROVE: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF COMMENTS, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GRANT ADOPTION OF THE PETITION 0 FSABIN COMPANIES INC., FOR A CHANGE IN FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM COM (COMMERCIAL) TO RM (RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM), AND SUBMIT THE FUTURE LAND USE CHANGE TO THE STATE DEpARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS, BECAUSE. . . . [CITE REASON(S) WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC] MOTION TO DENY: AFTER CONSIDERING THE TESTIMONY PRESENTED DURING THE PUBLIC HEARING, INCLUDING STAFF ,COMMENTS, I HEREBY MOVE THAT THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DENY THE ADOPTION OF THE PETITION OF SABIN COMPANIES INC., FOR A CHANGE IN FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM COM (COMMERCIAL) TO RM (RESIDENTIAL MEDIUM), BECAUSE. . . . [CITE REASON(S) WHY - PLEASE BE SPECIFIC] FAX NO. :7723407996 ·un. 10 2005 03:51PM P2 FORT PIE CE- UTILITIES AUTHORITY "Commi1'1'ed to QUQlityH 206 South Sixth. S at (34950) P05t omca Box 31 1 Fort Pierce, Florid 3494&-3191 Ph~")ne 772-466-1600 Fax 772-d65-6984 June 9, 2005 Mr. Ra dy Rodgers Friscia ngineering, Inc. '681 S Whitmorè ''Ortve' Port 5t Lucie, FL 34984 Re: Near Intersection of Edwards Road & 25th Street P reel #'s 2420-443-0001-0004 & 2420-444-0005-0005 As you requested, the Fort Plerce Utilities Authority would like to confirm the ava lability of water and wastewater service to the above- referenced parcels Availability, however, will be contingent upon the completion of constru tion of the required infrastructure, payment of the applicable fees and eh rges, and completion of an Annexation Agreement. We tru t this letter provides you with the information necessary to move forwar with your project. Please keep us Informed as to the progress of your pr ~ect. . BH/fkm pc: 0 vid A. Mellert, Environmental Engineer 1.:\C........r'P\.......... .. :lIUIII III ~'tI.Cht IÀl"W-UCt.øo, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ORDINANCE No. 06-026 File Number PA-05-011 AN ORDINANCE CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; PROVIDING FOR FINDINGS OF CONSISTENCY; AUTHORIZING AMENDMENTS TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAPS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS;PROVIDtNG FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; AND PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION. , . WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made thefollowing determinations: 1. Mr. Charles Sabin, Sabin Companies, Inc. presented a petition for a èhànge in Future Land Use Designation from COM (Commercial) to Residential Medium Density (RM - Orchid Place, Medium Intensity) 2. On April 20, 2006 the St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency held a public hearing on the petition; after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and has recommended that this Board ådoptthe hereinafter described request for a change in Future Land Use Designation from COM (Commercial) to Residential Medium Density (RM - Orchid Place, Medium Intensity)·for the property described in Part A below; 3. On May 16, 2006 this Board held a public hearing on the adoption, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Fort Pierce Tribune and the Port St. Lucie News on May 2, 2006 and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. CHANGE IN FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATION The Future Land Use Designation set forth in the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan for the property described as follows: THE WEST 742.98 FEET (8.9 ACRES) OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA" LESS AND 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 EXCEPTING THE EAST 560.0 FEET, AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND LESS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TOGETHER WITH: THE WEST 520.0 FEET OF THE EAST 560.0 FEET OF SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 FEET AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND THAT CERTAIN PARCEL CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, FILED FOR RECORD, OCTOBER 12, 1988 IN C.R.B. 607, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPTING THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN O.R.B. 1098, PG. J842, AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF S T. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. (Parcel Identification Number: 2420-443-0001-000/4.) Containing 8.9 acres more or tess. Location: Northwest of the intersection of Marina Drive and SR A-1-A owned by Grande Beach North Hutchinson Island, LLC, ' ' Owned by Charles Sabin, Sabin Companies, Inc., is hereby changed from COM (Commercial) to Residential.Medium Density (RM - Orchid Place, Medium Intensity) B. FINDING OF CONSISTENCY This Board specifically determines that t~ approval of this change in the Future Land Use , Element is internally consistent with the policies and objectives contained in the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, specifically Policies 11.1 :3.6 and 11.1.3.7 of the Capital Improvements Element, which identify this approval as a Preliminary Development Order and provide for the recognition that impacts of this approval on the public facilities of St. Lucie County will not occur until such time as a Final Development Order is issued. C. CHANGES TO THE FUTURE LAND USE MAPS The St. Lucie County Growth Management Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause these changes to be made in the Future Land Use maps of the Future Land Use Element of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and to make· notation of reference to the date of adoption of this Ordinance. May 16,2006 Page 2 Ordinance 06~026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 D. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS Special acts of the Florida Legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County Ordinances and County Resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this Ordinance are hereby superseded by this Ordinance to the extent of such conflict. E. SEVERABILITY If any portion of this Ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this Ordinance. Ifthis Ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property,or circumstances, such holding shall not affect its 'applicability to any other person, property or circumstances. F.. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE This ordinance shall be applicable as stated in Paragraph A. G. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Bureau of Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304. , ' H. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS The Growth Management Director shan submit a certified copy of this Ordinance to the Department of Community Affairs, 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100. I. EFFECTIVE DATE This Ordinance sháll take effect upon the issuance by the State Land Planning Agency of a Notice of Intent to find the adopted amendment in compliance in accordance with Section 163.3184(9), or Section 125.66(4) (a), Florida Statutes. May 16, 2006 Page 3 Ordinance 06-026 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 J. ADOPTION After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward x Vice Chairman Chris Craft x Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson x Commissioner Paula A. Lewis x Commissioner Joe Smith x PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 16th day of May 2006. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: DEPUTY CLERK COUNTY ATTORNEY May 16, 2006 Page 4 Ordinance 06-026 c: :c co 0 CO A.. 0 ~I C\ (f) .,..- w Ñ .,..- z+. N j C\ en 0 ~ Q) I I!: III Lt) ;:, "t: ~ I ~ 0 ~ .0 co Q) 'ð(\ u.. ..c ~ " OC0 .~ t ü ~~ ~ ' -- ~ ~l >. 'E ;:) o u êii > æ r:: 11 :¡s .5 ~UII!" >. 'E ;:) o U r:: 'E ~ 'Wattr, - ~ 3 ~ A Ú ¡.ur,:) tC-:J Æ¡uno:) aaqo4:>ea)0 A petition of Mr. Charle~ abin for a Change in FUtUi Land Use Designation from COM (Commercial) to RM (Residential Medium - Maximum 9 du/acre- Orchid Place) þËÄN W ...:....::> ·,·":'::''':'':::i .:. .': : :.'.'. ::.. :':.' .....: ...: .~:·..··ii·.···.·.·,: :.....:.:.:: ...'.:.::..<.:.....:..: :....::.,..:.:':< ......: ::.:,':':'::::' . :...... : ::.... . .... '. .'.': ..:.:.::. '. "':'" ". '.' ..:..:....:.: ..:.:.:..:....;....:.....:.:.....:..-. ..............:.. ....:<. :: ...... <i:·:·· <; ......;.. ;.;.:..:...'.: ;............:. .:..:'>..: ... ...:..:..... ..:. .:..: ::. ':.' ':': \ ~I \ \ C/) ~ I \ C/) .~íTBrNTLY RD :I: 'c/) '-I I I I I b ;1J ~ m 0, II \ ~ C/) _ :I: WILDWOOD¿Ñ:d:J ~ ~ () æ <C ::ï: <C æ COv€ !II NII,Nì DR ~ C/) :I: ~ ~ N C/) '--- ( \ Y ,/" > ............. ..... ...../.- .'<. ....:......:< .....~.~ :': ....... . :::... ....:. ./j>.'............... ,.... ~ ..: .......:....: I I ~---- .:.:. v~ .:i.1 // . :::. ~~ . ....0( <.>%/ l/:; Li l/ ~ o w o ...J o ~ ~- PA 05-011 W-ª Subject property i::'-:::';.:".:,,:::! City ofFt. Pierce rn ¡J: ~ ¡co' iN C/) - ~z V '<Y '0' ~:?~ ~ ~~~o~ ~ ~ ~/ý~J:-< ~'O' ~ æ 83 -n83 E8 EE µJ C/) EE EE 83 EB tE ~ EE· 83 :I: ~ --.-JL - ------ I--- - - - '. c--- ¡-- ¡--- I --,--- ·z- ...J o~ O' -0' ~: W BOOJ~~TH DR f--o::- w· f-- :I: C/) 0 - ex: C/) <C ...J c--- f.-- 0 i--- J: f-- I-- º f-- i-- Z\ - i--- L ED.w~RD_S_RD L-- _ __._ :~lDSlll !~ 'J: 10' -----~-- -I- '.0:: N ''''''(Y ,N__ IN~N C/) = Ørrf=-: ŒEHffi I r1rBEì Ar I I SIBLE 9:-~~ ~~_ fir_Iii .NtI1UI6l1WU7fl 09"'T1MI1I1 N A Map prepared February 22, 2006 I~J, ~ ····I~~" 'v/I ............~~ .........:~7 ~ c·i ~ ~ o w '0' ....J o Land Use DEAN Of 3~ -~. I ,.., z· ..... .,:..... 0;..,.:,:,.,: :'::.::' """1 ~r..RL' ...... ¡~;·::·i 1<::. .., ..... .....>.:-. '.. ....~. ·····i.· :K~ ., ·i:=.·. ,.' . , ....~..... . . ..... '. I ·.··:.·.·i······ .. '... :'" ': .. I:. : ..' .:. ...... .':":.".' I' .... .::. ... ....... ...... .... ;....: .....:. ':." ......:.........,......... ':iii/ .'. '.. Mr. Charles Sabin en - J: \ I I I 1-. ¡--- co I l- N en en' J: CJ) ...:.-. BRANTLY RD l- Ii N \ I en ~ N CJ) J: CJ) ...¡ [:: 01 I I..... ..... 1(;') I- CJ) I-- J: ;x¡ I I ~ RU .~ .N m CJ) ou :0 WILDW.O.OD~LN_ "w. ,;x¡ ?i í ;: , l- t.) æ en e( - J: ::E l- e( en COli€: N æ , CJ) rID N.4.Nr ~ Df? 1 q: <.....~ W ..... ":. . ...:..... ~ ·R M KU ~II "',. RU , " PA 05-011 P/F Y<i '<)'~ t ~'ò~~ ~ ("Ii ~ E EE wEB EE EB PJ CJ) EE æEErr E RU ~EB LL EB :J: ~ --.JL Z -II--- . ~IVI _ 8- ¡---~- r-- ffi - J: r-- CJ)- - I Rt: I--- aW.B01TH.DR - ¡--- f--- f--- 0 ex: I-- - CJ) ~~ - f--- - J: . - f--- S:2 - - f--- ~ I L EDWARDS RD _S ED~ARD.S.RD .---- ¡..= I- ......-- en en _ J:'- 0' 1-. ex: _ "";.~ (Y) _ N. ('II en_ en IIII I 1-1- en~ -0 ..... RU ~ I ~i- r U r U N_ - en - -- '--- - Ø-1:' ~ ELIZABETH AVE I III 1 - RU SIBLE I 5è ~uc# a,~~-=. fir_tli .NlZ7Uf6eme71t ZJ9N"hlumt WJ Subject property V;.·.·::·:...i City of Ft. Pierce N A Map prepared February 22, 2006 Zoning PEAN Of 3: ~ RS-4 ~. r~ ".~,;: Il;':,: . ~..., ... .R1 I':~ .: :<:. .... ....... " '.:' ....:-:. .":. I.·.t(}···=::· I :... . ..::..::..... ::,..'.':. :'.' . ".::' ': ":' ;::':...'...'. , .:..'.........: ......<, :::i...: ..:'.L' ::> . . .: 'J;;i~':' ..1'"'.. " ' :::.: :...... "'i'::' ':i ...... ','.' .... .... ". ....... Mr. Charles Sabin I \ J 1df î¿-r ~ÓA~: RS~ 00 00 ~ I \ ~ -rBfNTLYRD 00 :J: ~ ~(.II nl A , . ""T . \ T ~ 00 :J: I;; N 00 .!n :J: I I .~ 00 _WILDW.O.OD~LN_ ~ 3: ü Ci « ::!: f....<<5:. ~ 0:: ~r co 0-4«), . I G RS-4 RS-4 ~~v~ ~o~~ . ~ 0~~ æ PU033 Ìì83 EB ffi ]] 00 rn rn83rr æ ~EEDJ 0: 83 :J: ~ RM-5 ~C" .II 1(;) :;0 o '< m :0 ,:;0 í " f--- '"-- --' I t-- . r--- 3- -8- -~- _ 0:: '--- - ~ -RS-4 ~E-. PUD co - ;:<::'>.:,." it>·: ...... I ........ '.' ....¿hl. . , .........", . .......~ ':'.'.: ,.. I . ....... ····1 Ic~k:::=1t- ,.. . ·RV)) ~I/ ::..' .:....:.:..~:~ '::.::::., iJ, :..,:..... :':.'':...: :/:.LJ": ^I~_~_ ,. '0 ;/ ~ E'~ ,0 1':2 0:: "ù ~ o w '0' ...J o ,,.... I I'~ ~ w.BoTHDR - - - 0 - 0:: ~ 00 CG - ~~ f--- - CI~ f---:. :I: I:-- - 9- f-- - ~ I CG EDWARDS RD . -::§ ED~~R9.S.R.D 1 - ...... ..... ("I\. ~ oo. 00, ......~ ~·.~ê .....- L ' ~-~ - 00' 00 00- '--- , _0 ~c ~S ...... ... ¡!;i- ".... "T N_ I:-- f--- 00 f--- - - =Rj,-4 [ - - - - - æm hl" A I 'r ELIZABETH AVE R&-#I hbl A , '1'-'1 · K~-J ~ 'RM-fi AR-1 RF SIBLE RM-5 " PA 05..011 I ~ Subject property ::::::::/:>:¡ City of Ft. Pierce 9:- Å~ ~~.... (jrtTWtlÏ .NtnIIIfI""InÚ :lJlfP'Z"hnlmt N A Map prepared February 22,2006 -~ "" II '1~1t· ..... '8\ I 'o/í . . .1 i m' 1·~1· . ~ ¡ .~, .~ _I ·'úJ· . ¡ ~ . " ~ .~. I ..'~" .....+ ~.~~~!...,l ~ ' , /",. . .. . ,.," i .",¡ 1;ml' ",,' , :'~,- :1 ~Y~!i~-r~-: ;;... .. ~ '!lPllí1t ~~IMiJ,,. " .;:. - "" \; . ~n" 1I!~1];~:'~~r 3~'T;¡~lm. :1.... 11:. ~iI '-r'.' D" ~ .~.' <,t.' I '. ":.),&' ," ,;:¡--,' " " . .:: 1 &1'. '¡!kJ' 1:--:"' ,"~"~ . i . " .".... iï:::l " i? . III) MIl . ,;. .t ,!!!I . ! oil' .,., . · .. . ~!.,,,' ,:.:: :'II ,;..R. ..- ~ .r.~ ,~, I '. ~i_~I.. _Jr' ""'1 "" I ~ I_.~I\· .¥ ... , .> i \ r41'~~C.< · HJ~··i:;I,~ I~ I ' . · 'W' i ·-k'"':· 1]" I _~'iI!'. ,::.t 'tr r 'j 'p tlJ'.. ~ 1 I ~: -~I ~-~~: . ."" I - I')~ II - I '.='::::::1- .'iii. I~¡ . t ~ ,=CI. ' !!:I ; iii, .\ .<>< I!!J. . .. "'!'!!!I'!..'''''''''! !!!!!!!!!' C-:,I'1- "::::I' _ l'" e'.' ,II!'!!I,. !i<' I ~(.. -=== :1,"~ I'!:, ,.. · rI .~ ~.;., . .. :::::I ;~~ ..,. _. I...!, !!!!!!!!!!!'.;:' ¡'¡1... -n~;. I .-1:;:. .~,'~~'%. :=',.. 41.,. l:¡¡¡¡:t~lI: ',I!, ¡".- II. .'I¡JPJ~··"'}'"~ - '. ..:.:::I f,UL .11 III RJ:' - :'~"'~=¡~ii' . ~I;- n. ..: ~i! 1111.: ..iI~.J.iiI!:· ]. ,..... ,; ~., I~ '. . !':1>~ 1m.)' . .....-,¡. ..:.. .'; ¡ 1iI';M fI"'! ' 'J be. !I 1 iIiiII . . ~~J~. ~ ¡[¡: '!'.I' . ~~ . 'II , ,=~ ,·rt~;...li .' íi 1.' - ~ . qt! , ~;. !';~ 'II: .~. [' ¡¡¡¡ '~~ -~ . :'I~.',':II """~'i~~It.J" ··I'~··:·'I. ...~.. ~'t:~ ,.J~'~. ' ... í '- .;_.._-:~ .:' I, Mi" '.~_:}>::~ ( 'I: Mr. Charles Sabin I . I '.,u \~I' ~. " 111~. -, . -.' - .. \:~r .,-¡,.",.c::tn... . -.-.iI_ "!! ...1·" """rlll', ... ......W..., : .~~:~',' ,.,,11"'.11 . -' .>. I: , . _ f,.. .~' - .~.... ~~. '.' ß . \I':,'~' Ir,.. ., .:11- ~' .' '. ~:I'I' p;¡¡, ," ",.1.. .' : 'j~ C . ,. 1. . ....# '':I....'''' '~~?~':"'~ . __ ' ~.. ..e,;. In ~:" 1. ·I~rl Î]"f '.~ ~'. l' - :-":.' -: '!;.. . . T .';;j ~.. I!'" ¡' "",,:.!. ~:,_ II ,1 . 'Ci'~ . -,~~ :I!'.I-~ " ~¡';;ì;;;;;'V. IC' . 11··11·... ~ ..... I . .~rfjl N. !r..I' ! I'j... ';:'. i-..Fl~j! " ¡:. 'C¡c.~ "1~;::ii:,-. iiiii I~ - 1UJ.· ~ ....fE...:: '. "':.:::::;::;. ~. ~ ~ . .,' '\. : h" .~I."\I~ ,"""'n!' -=n'···~~~IIõ::I:'~' " ~] q .. _ . '"")".~:' ·'t'lI!!'· _~ . ~.JI< ~D.Q~'· "~. " ' :;. ......'... ~ _. '''. iliI!,~' .,.. l' .....~ 11'1' \g~'~'/.'ic~~i;···:'· . , == . ~ It} I " )(' I.A....~.'" ''''- '. ~"._- 1:oJJ..~:~' "...t _ .....I'J ~. _'" _. . - .. *- . r~.· ._,---.. .,- .... .~ .. < _ _ 7 '" ~ "'- "--,,...~«..,-..."'~- ~~~~ ~ ..,',,~,. 1!/·~~.~~¿~·;'1"r::-"- " ¡;¡;,,~~;~~, .. i- ,1'4:.,~.J~;: ~~~ ¡ ~ ~ I '~..-~,··~,~;'4:~~:4~ .'.;,':'~:~~: ' . 'í . .~;" "':." ". :.f"-.t ~.ß~"'~,j"5;;...'M!¥t::4.i .,.þ . i: ç .; ::4..;,.,#.... ~ .>~ . J '. ....~ ~ iI.~;.'ii~~~~ i . ~--:r'~ , ' . L::" : 'J. ~, " ;:..,~ ': . ~ " r....j..~~~.".:...J :;.J .' i: : I ~~t'~~.r,··. . ~~.:....~},1 ~.~...~, ';.'-. ~_'. {'¡' ,Y'iI1"Z'"L-JIII:' .... - II ,·.·t~· ~.::~." ....;.... ,.......... . II'" ....II··~~III'!"'!· . -m··..'~ . .. .-l1'l'i' .,,--_. ..' . . ~ '. ~",' ...." Eo I.':'~' _ -.. W"!; . iiiÏIII!!!:::ii I ¡ . .~ ï ' , ~ ::;,~.'".,.~;;"C.~ EJ· r;~: ¡ ~..~~.,o, , '~, .. :~.~ ~{: ~ t'.,..;:.{~.. ~. J..\ ii' ~ .;:.~:.; .':c..",..... "A ~ f/':IJ ~, .',., " , .' . .' ~.... _r..::¡"I· j"~. ~ ... J ..' ""'. ro.' ~lI'~ÍII..~ i.1I. E.;;: ~. 1; "&' </fO. II .. ' Lj ~., !:::.-""" . )F . .. III!!I!I.. ....~~--... '.~ 1_.'. s·· ....'. ;;·'··~..··'·II· . ,..-~ ~. r&.' '~...~JiiI..' ." .;;;:, .:" '·H""',,·· · ',- .' , ..."""., , . - '. - '. . , ,.'~' "4~". ,¡ ,...~ irIi'C' " ''':. .' .. :~Ic.""': Z~~¡~~·, 'I;.,~~fæ .-, .~<~ ',~ ~;~):~ . . I, ~ I "'"', II .. - ~ ,. ~ ...r= . j .,. ,< 't;·.t. ."'.,. . ... JI , ;<.' . , , 1 ~ A í , .- - J ". - ,. - -'-. II~· I, PA 05-011 ~ Subject property o City of Ft Pierce s;:.- ~~ a,~~Ä grtrWüf .7otanØ{1emenr ot!ptzrhnnrr ~ Map prepared February 22, 2006 Orchid Place St. Lucie County Proposed Future Land Use Map .'f1'^ . -^,O .':::: -.-.-. Legend _ RE Residential Estate _ RS Residential Suburban _ RU Residential Urban _ RM Residential Medium _ RH Residential High _ R-C ResidentiaYConservation _ SO Special District CJ AG-5 Agriculture-5 o AG~2.5 Agriculture-2.5 . CPub . COM _IND D PIF OW ~ MXD .H Conservation-Public Commercial Industrial Pubtic Facilities TransportatiorYlJtilities ' Mixed Use Development Historic Prepared by Houston Cuozzo Group, Inc.. Map prepared July 7, 2005 cñ Q) I/) ::J "0 I: .!!!. - I: Q) ~ '6' as (Ü E Q) X Q) "0 I: as (Ü I: ... Q) - .5 :5 .~ 0) ã ã; a. E o o 0) .0 (Ü .c I/) I/) 0) en ::J « o ê ~ >'0) ø~ 5.c .> c 0)0 O-~ 0)0 "0.2 ::J ... 13 ëj) .5:5 0)>. :g.o .c.c ~.g . .c "03: Sen as as 'B' ~ ._ as ë.... asO erò as.! :gá ~o c 00) 1/)0) 1:.0 ggJ as.c 1:- :õg. E 0 o I: 00 ... 0 0.... I/) 0 CD I: ~.!!! .2~ ~c o Q) CD E e.e. I/) 0 eQj CD > .cCD :::"0 1/).2 as:t:: e ~ as e. CD°1/) I/) CD O:!:: ..r:.1/) ž-as ;-5 I: ._ CD.c :2 3: E.E ..!! (I) ..; I: as I: o CD CD ; :¡¡'E as .e. I: I/) 0 0)- - ji).g ~ ~:§~ .........0 ~ o .- cnë~ - CD_ õE'" .¡: e. 2 :§.21/) o~E _CD~ .!!! 0 I: o >. 0 8..'!:: 0 ", 1:"0 v, ::J I: CD E as -5EI _0::J 00 I/) ë"O.!!! Q)Q)0 E ~:E CD 0. ~ ¡!: g- g. .... o æ .... U) ã -J < Õ w Q, U) ~ ë CD co e a. Q) -5 .... CD > o Q) :3 Q) .... o .5 >. I: « I/) Q) N .:: o .c S as I: o 1ã c 0) '0 Q) "0 Q) co ::J "0 I: .!!! ë ~ .... ::J o 0) .c - ÎÚ .c 3: ,g "0 S ~~ Q) Q) .... 0 as e üo. ~¡: c ûjQ) .- E 0"0 ~; ~ E 0.« (/)1: as as enã: as Q) "O.c CD ~- ã;..r:. 1:0) .!? 5 co .... O).c "0- as~ e§ as "0 I: 0> as.... .5~ É 1~ 3: 0 coO 0) lit .- .a ø>. I: as ~E ~§ c~ Q)I: "00) ~ '0 a:~ :s o o - ecñ ::Jo. -SE LLCO cñ(Ü as'ê eo> ~E .~ E 20 Q)O E.... Em 8,§ "03: CDQ) e.1: 0_ ëii° >- CD I: "0 CD O)E 1:0. ~.2 .S( Q) Q) ~ CD "0 1/)0> 0.c £- ,gë I: 0> .S! ~ ~o. "00 as- .5; 'Ë~ CD- E I: e..S! .Qõ Q) as ~.g "'C-:=: _0 asQ) ëg. Q).c E:!:: E 3: °ui 01/) e CD ~~ - õ§ 1/); as as e1:: as&. o I/) -I: .!!e ..0 - ~.c .- 0) ã.:ë liõ' ·!!!s I: I: o .- ._ 0 iiio. 5ÎÚ :-g "Oã; CD 0 I/) 0 ::J- -gZ as "0 :=..:¡ ::EO o.c 01/) ;::-gJ .!!! e 2as CD- E·~ E 2 o 0) oE CDE '=8 -J < Õ a: w :æ :æ o o ., ~o)"O CD 1::; > 0 0 CD "0 0 _0> co as.o- -5 32 ~ 1:::Je. III 0 E CD .c .- Een"O 0> 0 o co 0 -::J..r:. -0 - ... CD.~ .8 iii2..r:. "'0)0) e-Eëii .!EI: .50CD CD o.~ ..ooiii -- 0) o en CD I: I: I: :2,g >. ::J as I: ,gglll I/) o.~ _a.. -:asiii I/) ...r:. >-1/):> III a. .. ::: as 0) -oE.5 IIImõ e ::J I: -"0>- .!!!I:= ~.!!! 8 1:: - -Q)~ ... .... 0 _::JCD os e. I: - co o CD - -.c>- õ-1:: CD I: CD I/)Oe. ~"O e -o>e. c_ -as- CD I: C .c O)~, -Will iii 0)'- I/)"O-g CD 0> I: ~.~ ~ iiiCDI: -..r:.CD e - E CD°e. Eg.Q, E CD CII oc: > o::>~ >- ...r:. ~Io I: :0:: ::J CII'> I/) £130 ...asJl} CD - 0 ..r:..~ III .2» 2 a. .cO>E - E'- o E CII 1:0-5 ..20":' -....0 52::: .Q "0 .~ CII S CD ..r:.as... -; §¡-o 1::.- CD o:g:¡¡ e."O iii g.O>"O I/) ..0 III 1:"O..r:. .!!!~j e..c I/) co I: :ë1:..2 -oU .c:O::1: g» ~.2. . oenl:~ .c"",0::J _.sOU) «.5.5: e cñ c: o ~ :; 0) 0> a: - I: 0> E a. o j 0) o "0 c as J co ~ I: ::J o o 0) 'õ ::J J èñ .... Q) "0 I: ::J "0 0) :;:: 'Ë 0> :2cñ co as ase en as :g"O _CD .~ iii "01: 0).2» I: I/) .- 0> §"O N::E :mo 20 CD CD E.:c E~ 8£ 1ã.~ 0>1/) ã;CD "01/) 0::J E(Ü E.9- 8.~ ~o. 00> ... .s::. "0- CD "0 -ge S~ .5 ëñ .~ § 1:0 .2 CD ã;'" cas .!? :g :g~ "0_ ~S oe 2.ïõ ïõêD 'ê; CD 0) E"O EC o as OQ) Q).2 .=8 ê z ::::. "00) CDI/) ë::> CD "0 EI: .!!j EO. Q) .... .- ::J CD- ..o~ ,gCD -0£ CD_ "00 I: en .!CD .5 'õ ~'õ 1:0. OQ) ;:;.r::. 111- 1:.... .!?~ :g § "0... CD 0 1/)- ::J-O -oCII 1::2 .!!!~ ~o. EI/) .-as cD I: I/) 0 :3.. ïõ8 .~= üi8: ,ªas 1:,0) .- I: o '2 - 0 CD N :g.g 3.~ I/) Q) CI)~ asu :g .2 .-- := "õ ëCD CDe. "01/) ~~ 1:- ::J..r:. o:!:: 03: CD - £{J ..... ·C oêi) :3'6 CD 0) :¡¡ .5: o I: :;::0 'õ~ Q) as a. '1: 1/)- ,g~ "0"0 CD.5 ã.E lig 1/)"0 -I: § as 1ã~ I: Q) ~..r:. CD CD "O.c Q)~ 1/)- ::JO "0..0.; I: ..r:. I: as 0) CD -::JE ~eCD ~-5jjj -J < æ .... U) ::> D æ -; 1/)"0 CD- 2 5 ::J 3: 0_ I/) as CD.c iii; .~ co ... ::J 0._ ... I: o 0> g~ .0'- ::J"O a. as ...>' CD I: .cas :t: E CD 0 >..... ..0- "0"0 CD e = Q) o.:t: o.::J ::J.o en>. ':ëii 1:- CD as E ::J o.tT OCD - "0 ~ as 0> CD "0.0 00 -- ...."0 .g e 0.'5 cotT .!!e - =CD 13.0 as- :;~ I: co as CD en I/) 0> ::J 0- ~.~ O)êi) co ::J c:-"O as.5 ~~ 0> as o Q) ~.c _CD -- asas .!!O .oe- .!!!o -0 as I: >- as 0 0)- >0) as I: .c .- I/) -0 en a. ::Jo E .... eno. 0) co ;::c >0) :O::E 00. as 0 ïõëii ·c> -0> ~"O "C - c: C _0 ~= 0'- _"0 -c -¡ . Sc.!! as-.o I: .- 0) -c a; -0)0. :g ~ E -cEo I/) 0) 0 as 0..5 eenO) oc(as.o Nv 00 00 NN iÕ~ .cas ~g :E..!!! ~'Ö (I) CD ::>~ -g£ ~ CD' ~ '5 u. co N r:: as ä: ~CD r:: > ::J'- 0(1) oi Q..r:. .- CD 0'" ::JQ. -IE úi8 u) U) 0) o e a. E 0) E a. o ã) > 0) o - c => -0 0) e: e: '" ä: 0) ;: .c: 01 :J o :Š ... o U) e: .Q 1U e: 01 ïñ 0) -0 :? a: -- «0)-0 u);: ~ 0) 0 0 0- a. ~Õe 0)0) a. U):CO) >.:J.c: -U)- '2 U) 1U :J - E:;-E E'- 0) o :! E (0)a. ëii-o.Q ... - 0) -III> e::J0) ~õ-o -"'0 00)_ U)..c: >. "'-1:: 0) -0) ... -0 a. "'~o ¿'5 C. £ gO) -- ~~ ~-- -- 0) ,0 .ce:>. o .Q ;!:: ;1U]š O)e:", e: OI;!:: e:ïñ~ '" 0) - -0- a.O)B ~ CI)-- 0:J~ ¿-o.c: .- e: a. É~O) ~U);: !5o '" ... ~ iiiO)O) £ -g.> U):J~ '" -0 0) 0)0)- êü~..9! Ea. 0) ... 'E U)0)0 ,ga.o Õ·~~ -O):J -0....- 0) 0 0 ._ '" e: ë.U):t; a.U)- '" 0 :J 0) æ 0 .c ~ oêii.c: - a..Q .!!! £.! ~ ~'2 >. 0:Ju) 00lU) ~ e: 8· 10 = 0 oã) C. O)~o U) ... e: :J 0) -- -oe:e: e:'- 0 IOe:N :::o~ ~>.O) a:;!::;: __U)_ E :ii 0 :J -0 e: '6¡¡;g 0).- 0) ~Eë. ëii-8E .- - 0 -U)o ¡~~ -0 ¡;.:' .- E 0 U):Jõ>' t:.E'!!'iJ¡ -- U) e: 0) )( ;::: () ..c:IG",_ I:- E U).5 :¡¡ ::> is w :¡¡ ...J c( ¡:: z w c ëñ w a: u: U) e: o ~ .Q ë. a. 10 o e: '2 o N u) e: o ~ e: 01 'iij 0) -0 0) U) :J -0 e: ~ 0) U) ,e: 0) :š e o E 0) ;: -0 e: '" U) 10 e 10 => a: :;- û.i e: 0) £ "'cD ~.5 .Q§ 0) N .c:O -=> . ¡ a. 0) ... ~~ 01 >. .c= e: E g~ ëi) E e: :J e E ;~ U)'Ë III 10 -- ~ cD e:CI B'~ :3~ ~.2 -og e: -- ~IO -0) .~ «ï EO) 0) U) :2:J U)-o ! e: ~.!!! 'iij~ ¡a: -00) E;: _:2 e:_ -o:c: ~~ X a: - a.:;- .Qe: 0) :J > 0 ~o o () -£ ...- ()o 'E'" 0' () e: .... _III .e: e '" o e: ""- U)-C U) () 0- ... IG 00 ...12 0) () a..c U)_ :!::UJ e: :J :J E 01 .5~ =()u) 0) a.- ~ 0 0 -0....0 It) 2- 13 .....0U) -0 .!!. -0 QI .c e: O):J'" o U) _ )( Q) U) QI .c: >. 0- '" --c~ -e:-O g",~ ...:-~~ e: :!:: e: 0) =,'0 E 0._ a. J!! iii OQ)O) -Q)o~ .- Q) ã; ~ ... -OQ)- ~~.~ .- Q)- U)_o e:",a. ~ ~ - ... Q) e: ..c:-o .!2J ~ 13 ..c:~0) ~-cõ '" e: ... -o",a. o ... Q) E Q)-~ E1U- o~g> 0-·- 0"'-0 '" .... :J oEë3 -Q)e: -0 0-- 0) '" U) -oo·!!! c ~:t:::: Q)e:= ....,.- 0 .£ (j ~ O)Q)-o «ï 2 e: _010 IoU) a:0Q) --- 0 .c: 0)-::;; 0- r::. I~:g ëii:ge: ;::: a.~ e: 0) ... 0) .c :J -0 _ '= ~ ëii a:E.!!! -o:!::.g 0) _ iii ~ï¡; e:'- > .2» ~ 10 U)O)U) 0) - III -0 .5 .c: gJ .!!! .c: Q) .c: .Q ...::..r:: «"'~ :I: CJ :¡: -' c( ¡:: Z W c ëñ w a: cj ô >< :æ - --o~.... .g e: '- .2 fijS§O) '6£Eiii U)-E'i:: -:Joa. £ ê"o e - _ a. o ~ 1::- a. e: ._ 0 '" g §.g.,g "'E«- .2E_o ë.ollle: a.oe:>. «-o.Q '" ·.e:iiiE -g III E- o~~~ 111·- e: - :J]š-e: 0'- ~.Q o)(e:- e:.!!!:J'" QI - 0 êii QI-oO-o ... 0) - '" .~.!!! :! U)U)°0 õ.~.30 0) 0) ,¡¡; g;:0E 0-0010) o....c:E QI ~ -:. e: ~ III gJ e -o-õe> e:c:.",e: '" 0) -oO)QI ~-o g>:I ,_U)",c- iiie:..c:c > .Q e :I °iiiO)'" 2.Q EO .- - .- ëii 0) 'iij LO .- ... U)'o> 0 0) "'...!. QI "§ë3=g. QI"'- gJU)Q)o O):J-OU) ... -0 .2 '" "'e:OQl :g .!!! ,5 Ìii o-õ-o .c: "'·c e: ..c-as ,2-.Q .!!! .- ;!:: -0 U) E-oU)~ QlIO-:J -o,::¡.c:- .- OJ -: .s Bêii,2C/) U)..c:U)'" '-""0)-0 e: >-'c o U) '" 0 .- '" -0- iii 0)'- LL c ... -0 - OIalCO '-0)"'0> :ß:g~:: "'O..c:U)QI --Eõ. DOO)aI ,~~g..c: 6coO EO~B 0)0)",- E.cga a.:2 - :J 12g:g~ . ~..c: e ~~ O)U)-o 0 D-o-oj;::: QlCaI_'" U) '" 0 ftI C => a) - e .!2J -co~o:g '~ ¡ m -å -0 ,- -0 U) 'i:: 0) ::E20)'0U) 0)a.2·_:I .c:.c:e:O-o -... ...c:: õ~ g>¡S E()'2Eëii Q).cca.c --oSoo ,5 "3 a. ã) E QlOO)ã;-o t:~~O~ I:- Z W :æ D. o -' w > w c w en ::) c w ~ :æ :i :13 aI() ... -0'" QlO) -oU) 'Õ=> e:-o -0) QI )( .c .- 0::E ;'0 ~c .c:() .2E -§a. > 0 e:- ~~ a. 0) ....-0 0)0) 0; '" e: E·- - -0 a.() 0) U) O:J e: 0) 8.c "'B õe ê~ 0..... - ' QI"-: .c:..... :š _~ -oõ ()O) 1U:ë 00 '6e: e:- .- -0 -00) c= "'0 ~gJ ~m 0)0 E.c: .- - o 0 - - U) e: "'.Q -0== 0)-0 1U11 Ole: QI.- .... - 01'" QI'C U) 0) O)'E .co -00 -e: g'~ .c:o U) = QI,2 U) 0) =>.c: -01:- QI . xU) .- U) ::EO) U)8 '" ... -0 a. () e: ~.Q û.iiii U) e:' ftlOI ë3 'iij U)oO) "''' em "':J ()-o .c:e: -III e:- :ëQl :=-c ~.:: U) 0 Ql1:: U)'" =>a. . U) C QI 0,- z1:: () -c a. () 0' c.... ca. III() -U) D.o -.c: 01- =>' a..:! ::;.º :ii]! E :J a.C) oeD _a: ~- Q)e: o~ ~ c. co' ......_U) ....O)e: -c ã;.Q ~O]! C-o:J tUcOl ä:tU~ Q)-'o .c: ~x ~§::E -0'" ,goo _ Q) 0 --a: tU°z fïi.3o. C) ... - CC/)O '2 0) => O.c:a.. N- c.5 ~ .;¡; " :: 0I,g 0) C 'C -0 tU 0 C .c:U):J (0)a. >.-0 0 CU)- tU tU ~ ¿-::-8 00 ~x 0 tU~ - .Q -" :=.....0) U)COl . ~ 0) e -E:I °a.o ~oo .- ã) c ~ > 0) Q) 0) Q) ED'" ,- 0) tU "U)U) :!=>§ +=: -0 ;: c: 0) tU QI )( C :2 ~.2» QI .... :g £0-0 .c:OOl ~ a:.5 ,zc -0.0 a-N = .... C» a.Cc EO);::: oE.!!! oa.x QI 12 Q) .!!!g?..!!! ~():e QlO1U ;: ¡¡; a. 0:;:: E U)CO U)Qlo .!!!~.c: 5~j o c5 ~ -0 Lt) .... " Q) QI ~ QI :;- û.i C QI -0 ~ E QI -0 'iij Q) ... U) U) e 01 -0 '5 o .c: U) () U) tU o o c .5 a) ~ ë. Q) ~ tU - B .!!! - .c: o :ë ~ .5 õ 'i:: '0 '6 :;- 'iij ,C 0) :š QI £ >. .c -0 QI 1U "3 01 e 0) .c ëii .c: U) E 0) E a. o ~ 0) -0 ëii :;:: e: QI -0 û.i 0) a: o C\I'<t 00 00 ~C\I IÔ~ ..c:1O ~ê ::E..!!J ~i:i 11): ::::>'> '0 CD cD: ~ !!! ::J 'S u. ~ ~ ã: ~CD §.~ 011) oi CD..c: -- CD u... ::JQ; ...JE ui8 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS GROWTH MANAGEMENl April 27, 2006 Joe Smith 1800 Anywhere DR. Anywhere, FL 34982 USA In accordance with the St. Lucie CmU1ty Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that Mr. Charles Sabin has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Future Land Use Designation from COM (Commercial) to RM (Residential Medium) for the following described property: Location: North side of Edwards Road, approximately 6S0 feet west of South 2Sth Street. THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS- AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST The second public hearing on the petition will be held at 6:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on May 16, 2006, County Commissioner's Chambers, SL Lucie County Administration Building Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort P~erce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Boar~ of County Commissioners at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing. ' . County policy strongly encourages your input and comment at public hearing of this matter before the Planning and Zoning Commission and County Commission, rather than by contact outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). We encourage you to speak at these public hearings, or provide written comments for the record. The proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, - he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be· sworn ip.. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least fòrty-eight (48) homs prior to the meeting at (772) 462-1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. Please call (772)462-2822 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number: PA-OS-Oll. Sincerely, ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS' Doug Coward, Chairman JOSEPH E. SMITH, District No. I . DOUG COWARD, District No.2. PAULA A. LEWIS, Dimict No.3. FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No.4 . CHRIS CRAFT, District No.5 County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson Website: www;co.st-lucie.fI.us 2300 Virginia Avenue- Fort Pierce, FL. 34982-5652 Administration: (772) 462-1590 Planning: (772) 462-2822 GISfTechnical Services: (772) 462-2822 FAX: (772) 462-1581 Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 FAX: (772) 462-1579 Tourist Development: (772) 462-1535 1(800) 344-TGIF FAX: (772) 462-2132 Y n n006 SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS TUESDAY.MA L,L· . NOTICE OF CHANGE TO THE FUTURE LAND 'USE'MAP OF THE S1: LUCIE COUNTY" . COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners will considér a request to change the Future Land Use designati9n of the lands indicated on the map ¡nthis advertisement A public hearing on this proposal will be held before the Board of COunty Commissioners on May 16, 2006, at 6:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, in. the County Commission Chambers,' 3rd Roor of the St. Lucie. County Administration Annex, 2300 VirginiaAvenue, Fort Pierce, Florida The purpose of this public hearing is to consider a request to change the Future Land Use designation from COM (Commercial) to RM (Residential Medium). .... OIINO Sobin PA0&0011 ~ . ... Petmon Applicant: Petition Number: location: Mr. Char1es Sabin PA-D5-011 North side of Edwards Road, approximately 650 feet west of South2sth Street· .'. Copies of the proposed amendment may be obtained from the St. Lucie County Growth Mana,gemeht Department, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort' Pierce, Florida 34982. Any questions may be directed to LarrySzynkowkski at 772-462-6456.· All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard. Written comments received in advance of the public he~ng will also be considered. Written comments to the Board of County Commissioners-should be received by the Growth Management Department - Planning DMsion at least 3 days prior to the. scheduled hearing. The petition' file is available for review 'at the GroWth Management Department offices'locatedat 2300 VirginiaAvenue, Fort Pierce, Rorida, 34982. Please call 772/462-2822 if you have any questions or require additional information. I The proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. PURSUANT TO Section 286~01 05. Florida Statutes. if a person decides to appe81 any decision, made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter ,considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a ',record of,the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need ·to, ensure that a verbatim recOrd of the proceedings is made, which recQrd includes the testimony' and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public; hearing may be continued to a date-œrtain. \ Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting shöuld contaCt the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at leasttorty-eight (48) ,hours prior to the meeting at 7721462-1m orl:D.D. 7721462-1428. ; , S1: WCIE COUNTY BOARD Of: COUNTY COMMISSIONERS 'S1: LUCIE COUNT'(, flORIDA /&1)()UG COWARD, CHAIRMAN PUBUSH DATE: MAY 2, 2006 MNOV~~VO~~ ONN m ~~~OV MM~~òò~-8~ ~M- ~ mmmQQ ~~T~~~~~9~ T~~ ~ IIIII ~N~~~~~~~~~rN~ø~~m~~mmoo m~~m~m~~m~~mmm~~~8m~~M~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~gg S B~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~«~~~~~ 0~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ CD CD "5 ëãëã ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~!~¡~~ii~~~~~~ ££££££££~£~£££~~£I££~~!~E-££~~~ 1>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~c~=~~~~E ~~~=~ I~OOOOOCOOO~O~OOO~CDO$OOOOU~~OOO~~ ~~~~~~~~w~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~W ~ ~ ; v ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ I/) iiï~" ~ID -!!: ~ v ~ ëãëãvv ~- ~ c ~8c ~~ 0 ~~OO Q.CI) ~ ~ ~C~ ~<} CDCDii~ ~BOO ~~~ ~ ~2~~~CDC:t EEì}~~~e~ ~<UCCCCI/) ~lu<I/)~C~~C ~~:t:t~~~~~ ~.CI)CDCDCDCD~ ~~CI)·~~a~£CDCD=UUB3~~~0~ W~O»»~~W~Oi~~ .i>w~~cc~~~O~ 1/)~~æeeee~W~Uæ.~~ N~eMCDCD~~~~~~Õ :Õ>U~~~~W~ÕwZo>w~enenz~~~~~<enenenen~ ~oo~mmøm~m~ ~O~wo~~oømmoorrrO~ ~0000000mOœNOON8~Q8-omm~~NNNO~ <~~~~~~~~Q.g~~~gQ~~-~Q.~~~~~~~~~ III E " C II. c:! CD C ~, o c 3: i ~~== ~>~ 'õ:e e =CD~ <~en en '2 o ~ CD 'C ~ ~ ~ ~ c < CD E ~ c ...I c:! cu i o " t. c 'ë- ~ :t c ~ > o c 8 - I/) - E ~~J1! ð~~ I/) CD E ~ ~ E E ~ :t CD E ~ ~~ ~ g¡ ~g ~ :t:t 8 I/)g¡~ ~~2!E ~E"3~ ~c~ ~~~".3:~,!!!s; ~~Q."'~..JC:> < ~ .~ ~ c ! o 0 ~ ~ .g .E w~ co o o N ,,) - UO ~~ o ~~ ::¡ ~~EE Ë ~~EE ~ ~ ~ 1!2!88 ~ o It== 0 ~ ~o 0 - - 0 ~ .s t:S1ll i¡~ .se >- E!:! enEE rñC) CD Ii el e,,~£ ~I~~ Ig ~ ~o Q.~ Q.~e~ EECDCD ~ö c o~~~ 1/)0 l/)~œO ~~~~ccCË~ ~ 0 enen c~u ~ Q.~ ~~CDCD~~~OU ~1/)1~~~-8 ~c ~~IEe§.ll/)cuaii~~~oj cu~~~~~ I/)~Ol/)O~~ ~cI/)CCD~CD~,,"~~~CI/) i!:!~~gg!i~g~§~~~e~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ouenw~~C<>~~cenen:tu~~w~Q.:t:t>".zzzen:t ~ " 2 .a cu -II. -5 q~ ~~ <.. 0.. CD :I .5 'C .a a. " a.' 0< =~ ~&. 5e ..0.. .2E g'e ïi -'I: Ocu Q. ~ <0 mO~O~~~M_m_~mNg~N~-~-~_mooo gg5gggoggg~00808gog088g88gg 000000000000800000000000000 ~orrNMv~orr~NNvNWr~œrM~rOOO ONOOO___NNNoo_NNgg-I~~~goooo ^888g8gg8g8gg88g8008Iog50g8g8- ~VNMOOOOr~rr¡NrrrVVorrrNro~oc _~~ øø~ø~~~~ ~~~ ~m~~~ °õoß_ ~OO~OOOOQØQQ ~QQQ~~OQQQ~~gogi=CCD ~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN~NNOOO ~ ~vvvvvvv~vvvvv~vvvvvvvvvvooo ~< ~NNNNNNNNNN~NNNNNNNNNNNNN~~~ 5c t Local Planning Agency - May 16, 2006 File Number PA-05-011 MEMORANDUM GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners Larry Szynkowski, Senior Planner ¡;( May 11 2006 Minutes of the April 20, 2006 P&Z Commission, Pages 6-8 RE: Application of Sabin Companies, Inc. for a Small Scale Change in Future and Use Designation from COM (Commercial) to RM (Residential Medium, Maximum 9 du/acre) Ordinance 06-026 cY The attached minutes were inadvertently left out of the packet for the above agenda ~ My apologies. At that meeting there was a motion to recommend to the BOCC to deny the adoption of Sabin Companies petition to change the future land use designation. The motion failed 3-3. A motion to recommend to the BOCC to approve the adoption of Sabin Companies petition to change the future land use designation was made. The motion passed 4-2. , construction project scheduled to begin June 1. This project is oflimited scope and limited duration. The dirt will simply be used to provide fill for State Road 70 and the permit and the mine dirt will expire upon completion of the project. Chairman Hearn stated that a motion to pull this petition from the agenda has been made and seconded and was unanimously passed. Chairman Hearn further stated it is up to staff to re- advertise this petition and re-schedule this agenda item when it is ready. Agenda Item #2: Charles Sabin. Larry Szynkowski, Senior Planner, presented an application from Ch Companies for a small scale Chan e in Future Land Use Desi atio RM (Residential Medium) with a maximum of 9 dwelling units of Edwards Road approximately 500 ft west of 25th street. Pro residential on that property with a maximum of 6.5 dwelling uni er acre. commercial to residential addressed by staff is felt it would be appropriate fo residential medium since it was a minimal size area. The project does comply an the land development regulation code. The staff recommends that this petition be Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation that this petition for a Ch Land Use for a small scale be adopted. in, Sabin and COM (Commercial) to ocation is the north side an 80 unit town house s going from o become onsistent with *' ed to the in Future Mr. Mundt commented on page 6 regardi then it highlights that the Ft. Pierce Utility this will also come under the possibility of governmental coordination element on page 1 Pierce for review however in this section there 1 In the next section regarding change in zoning fr no reference in any of the staff comments, it states dated March 16. Mr. Mundt stated he would have a regarding the negative response from the City of Ft. 'tal improvement programs for water and waste but . s the provider of utilities in the area and so e City of Ft. Pierce. In the inter rovided to the City of Ft. response from City of Ft. Pierce. S-4 to P , it is thirty seven pages back with t the city of Ft. Pierce opposes this in a letter . ated it if reference had been made rce. Chairman Hearn was concerned regarding a statement on bottom pg 2. "a future land use amendment is not regarded as a development order as defined in Florida statutes and does not imply that any specific development scenario can occur on the property. No right to obtain the final development order or any other rights to develop the subiect property are granted or implied by County. if the request ofthe comprehensive plan amendment is approved". Ifthe future land use is being changed to a hi~her density. is that a right unless it is approved? Mr. Nix replied no it is not. because it is a policy ~ide. The entitlements come with the zoning and approvals of plans. Attorney Lee Dobbins representing the applicant. Charles Sabin. Inc. requested to open items 2. 3 and 4 because it would be easier to look at the proiect as a whole. Attorney Heather Young stated that they can be looked at as a whole but the public hearing has to be opened on each one. Chairman Hearn stated regarding all the properties in St. Lucie County that have a land use. for instance 9 units per acre. no entitlements are allowed until a zoning change has been made. 6 , Attorney Lee Dobbins, representing Sabin Companies, Inc. stated he will discuss the project as a whole (agenda items 2, 3 & 4) for the purpose of clarifying what is being done and what needs to be accomplished with this plan. It currently has a commercial land use designation across the entire property. The west half of pro pert v has residential zoning. It would have been easier to apply for a zoning change and develop the entire property as commercial. Rather than changing the zoning, change the land use to residential and do multi-family residential in that portion of the property which would produce less traffic. Staff is recommending approval on all three of the applications. Comments from the City ofFt. Pierce indicate that the project does not comply with city code. Attorney bbins stated that they do not comply with a code for which the project is not designed. As long oject is in the County, they are designed to County code. Ms. Hensle stated that there was a . oint meetin with the Cit Commissioners and the school board recentl . Part of the disc conflict. Chainnan Hearn stated that he agreed with Mr. Dobbins Pierce now and the will not be until an a eement is to comply with city standards. Their obligation is ~ Attorney Dobbins stated that they would adhere to the The City ofFt. Pierce stated that they did not believe that neighborhood and felt that the density was inappropriate bec density. It was pointed out to the City ofFt. Pierce that Fronterra, directly a street is going in as several hundred units of that exact density. The City ofFt. Pierce did know this. It points out that the City of Ft. Pierce does not know some of the decisions the h e come from the County. Attorney Dobbins also stat west of this property is Edwards Preserve project that is going in and has been approved b ofFt. Pierce) P & Z for 5.5 units per acre which is higher than the density that they s that is appropriate for the area. It does not reflect the reality ofthe way this area for development. Chainnan Hearn stated tha . s made a ver clear oint that ri ht across the street it has the same exact densit on e same situation and in the count commissioner's release that was Attorney Dobbins pointed out that commercial to residential. e City ofFt. that they have árd. Ken Natoli, Eastern Quasi Group, Landscape Architect and Site Planner, provided a technical presentation and architectural pictures to show elevations to clarify what is being proposed and presented a site map to provide a view of the entire project located on 25th Street and Edwards Road. Mr. Grande stated it would be best to discuss just the residential portion which relates to the future land use. Chainnan Hearn stated an overview ofthe entire project would be beneficial to understanding the entire project. Mr. Nix stated he believed that it is a fire code requirement to have another entrance for emergency purposes. Chainnan Hearn will open public hearing. Public Hearing is closed. Mr. Grande made a motion recommend to deny the adoption of the petition of Sabin & Companies for a Change In Future Land Use designation from commercial to residential medium because the use will be inconsistent with the surrounding community. Ms. Caron seconded the motion. 7 , Mr. Grande stated the commercial proposal for part of this that is already commercial makes a lot of sense. Roll Call Mr. Grande - Yes to deny Ms. Caron - Yes Ms. Hammer - No Ms. Morgan - No Mr. Mundt - Yes Chainnan Hearn - No Tie vote - 3 to 3 - Motion fails - Future Land Use Motion to approve by Ms. Caron, was seconded by ? Roll Call Ms. Caron - Yes to approve Mr. Grande - No Ms. Hammer - Yes to approve Ms. Morgan - Yes to approve Mr. Mundt - No Chainnan Hearn - Yes to approve 4 to approve - 2 to deny -approved for land use amendment. Per Ch mnan Hean application will be forwarded to the Board of Commission with a recommendation of approval. A enda Item #3: Sabi Andrew Riddle, PI e from RS-4 Residential Single Family- 4 dulac Zoning District to PUD -Planned t - Orchid Place Zoning District. The froperty is 8.9 acres located North side of E ately 650 ft West of South 25t Street. Existing zoning is residential, single fam elling u Its per acre. The surrounding zoning is residential. sin Ie famil 4 dwellin units er d UD Planned Unit Develo ment Lake Forrest Parks to the North. Commercial General to the and South and the Cit ofFt. Pierce to the West. The applicant proposes an 80 multi-f¡ y dwelling unit and 10- 8 unit buildings. The proposed plan is maintaining 4.26 acres. The proposed RM (residential medium) Future Land Use will allow up to 9 dwelling units per acre. Staff recommends that this petition be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval with a condition. Chainnan Hearn will open the public hearing. See no-one, the public hearing is closed. Ken Natoli stated open space contains 2.62 acres includes the small grass area around the back, all green space, pool, community area and other open spaces all around the project. Chainnan Hearn stated 7 AM is the starting time of construction. Ms. Caron stated working hours of construction are 7 AM to 5 :30PM, Monday through Friday and on Saturday, 7 AM to lPM. Charlie Sabin stated those working hours for construction are fine. Ms. Hammer had a concern of one way in and one way out. A condition of this commission's approval has to have another exit entrance. Mr. Nix stated staff will have the fire department review it and make comments and send it to the Board of County Commissioners. Ms. Caron commented regarding the price range of housing for the work force. 8 ,. ¡' ~ To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: ~ , COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED c=J OTHER County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Agenda Request Item Number Date: sp_ 05/16/06 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ X ] Board of County Commissioners P~sented By Growth Management ~ ~ ' . \c;rowth Management Direc Consider Draft Resolution No. 06-057 granting a Change in Zoning from the RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Orchid Place) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known as Orchid Place - PUD. (File No.: PUD 05-021) Sabin Companies, Inc., has applied for a Change in Zoning from the RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District to PUD (Planned Unit Development - Orchid Place) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unit Development Site Plan approval for a project to be known as Orchid Place - PUD. The petitioner is proposing a residential development of 80 multiple-family dwelling units in ten (10), eight unit buildings located on the north side of Edwards Road, approximately 650 feet west of South 25th Street. This petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The request for a change in zoning is in conjunction with a request for a change in the future land use classification being presented as a separate item. N/A At the April 20, 2006, public hearing on this matter, the S1. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 4 to 2 (Mr. Grande and Mr. Mundt voted against the motion) with three members absent (Mr. Lounds, Mr. Knapp, and Mr. Trias), recommended approval of the requested change in zoning and preliminary site plan with conditions. Approve Draft Resolution No. 06-057, granting a Change in Zoning from the RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Orchid Place) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known as Orchid Place - PUD. Approved 5-0 Motion to include additional opaque wrought iron decorative side to extend down front of property. Emergency entrance to meet Fire ENCE: D DENIED Board approval. ,~ Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget: ~~ ERD.. Other: Purchasing: Other: Transmittal Master Checklist Orchid Place - pun Primary Distribution Sent Received Environmental Resources Department, Amy Mott: X X Public Works Surveyor - Ron Harris: X X Road, Bridge, & Transportation - Scott Herring: X X Storm-water Management - Chris Lestrange: X X General Engineering - Kyle Croce: X X Attorney Prop Acquisition - JoAnn Riley: X X Sheriff's Department - Major Monahan: X X St Lucie County Fire District - Captain Derek Foxx: X X Residential Only School Board of St Lucie County - Marty Sanders: X X Geoe:raDhical Based City of Fort Pierce - Kara Wood: X X Commission Review: May 16, 2006 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: THROUGH: Board of County Commissioners Bob Nix, AICP - Growth Management Director ~ G·· f:J., " FROM: Andrew Riddle, Planner ~. DATE: May10,2006 SUBJECT: Application of Sabin Companies, Inc., for a Change in Zoning from the RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family - 4 du/acre) 'Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Orchid Place) Zoning District. LOCATION: North side of Edwards Road, approximately 650 feet west of South 25th Street. EXISTING ZONING: RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family - 4 du/acre) PROPOSED ZONING: PUD (Planned Unit Development - Orchid Place) CURRENT FUTURE LAND USE: COM (Commercial) PROPOSED FUTURE LAND USE: RM (Residential Medium) PARCEL SIZE: 8.9 acres PROPOSED USE: 80 multiple-family dwelling units in ten (10), eight unit buildings. PROPOSED DENSITY: SURROUNDING ZONING: 9 dwelling units per acre RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family - 4 du/acre) and PUD (Planned Unit Development - Lake Forest Park) to the north. CG (Commercial General) to the east. There is a proposed development known as Frontera - PUD located to the and south. The City of Ft. Pierce is to the west with an R-1 (Residential, Single-Family - 4 du/acre). SURROUNDING LAND USES: The surrounding properties to the north are designated with a RU (Residential Urban) and RM (Residential Medium) future land use classification and COM (Commercial) future land use classification to the east and south. The City of Ft. Pierce is to the west with a proposed May 10, 2006 Page 2 Subject: Orchid Place - PUD File: PUD-05-021 development known as Edwards Preserve with a density of 5.51 du/acre. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #1 (2400 Rhode Island Avenue) is located approximately 1 mile to the north. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property will be serviced by the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA). TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way for Edwards Road is 80 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity. **************************************** STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Board of County Commissioners shall consider and make the following determinations; 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed change in zoning and petition for Preliminary Planned Unit Development is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. There are a total of 80 multiple-family units in 10 buildings proposed in this development. The site plan that is submitted as part of this rezoning to PUD is consistent with the provisions of the Land Development Code. 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The proposed Orchid Place - PUD application is being submitted concurrently with a Future Land Use Map Amendment application (PA-05-011). The proposed Future Land Use and the proposed Orchid Place - PUD are consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the S1. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of S1. Lucie County. The proposed Future Land May 10, 2006 Page 3 Subject: Orchid Place - PUD File: PUD-05-021 Use designation of RM (Residential Medium) would allow a possible maximum density of 9 dwelling units per acre. The project proposes 80 total units at a density of 9 per acre. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The proposed change in zoning to PUD for the purpose of allowing the construction of a multiple-family residential development is not inconsistent with the proposed Future Land Use Map Amendment application. The proposed Future Land Use classification is RM (Residential Medium), which allows up to 9 dwelling units per acre. The proposed PUD has a gross density of 9 dwelling units per acre. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; There have not been changes that would require an amendment. The site is located inside of the Urban Service Boundary of the St. Lucie County. Water and wastewater services will be provided through the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA). 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; The proposed site plan, which is tied to the Future Land Use Map Amendment application, would create additional demands on water/wastewater facilities in this area. The subject property is located inside of the Urban Service Boundary of St. Lucie County. Water and wastewater service is to be provided by FPUA. The public school system can be expected to be responsible for the education of an additional 17 students (0.207 students per dwelling unit, multiple-family). The applicant is expected to comply with the St. Lucie County School District Mitigation Agreement for impacts resulting from this development. This Preliminary PUD is not requesting to reserve roadway capacity at this time. The Final PUD will be required to determine the actual impacts on the roadway system and all necessary roadway improvements. Drainage will be handled through a master drainage system which requires permits from the South Florida Water Management District (S.F.W.M.D.), St. Lucie County Stormwater permit, and the North St. Lucie River Water Control District Drainage Connection permit. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed change in zoning and development of this site as a planned unit development is not expected to result in any adverse environmental impact. The site does not contain any known unique or threatened habitat. May 10,2006 Page 4 Subject: Orchid Place - PUD File: PUD-05-021 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; An orderly and logical development pattern will result with this change in zoning. The subject property is located in an area consisting of medium density residential. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment is not in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. COMMENTS The petitioner, Sabin Companies Inc., is proposing a residential development of 80 multiple- family units in 10 buildings on 8.9 acres of land located on the north side of Edwards Road, approximately 650 feet west of South 25th Street. The project is to be known as Orchid Place _ PUD. Section 7.01.03(1) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that 35% of the site must consist of open space. The proposed planned development maintains 4.26 acres of the project area in total common open space. Dry retention contains 1.22 acres, recreational area contains 0.42 acres, and other open space contains 2.62 acres. The remainder of the project consists of those areas designated for residential development (buildings, roadway, driveways, and sidewalks). At the April 20, 2006, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 4 to 2 (Mr. Grande and Mr. Mundt voted against the motion) with three members absent (Mr. Lounds, Mr. Knapp, and Mr. Trias), recommended approval of the requested change in zoning and preliminary site plan. Mrs. Hammer requested that the project contain a second ingress/egress to the development for emergency use. Mr. Grande stated he was concerned with the proposed development being inconsistent with the surrounding neighborhood. There is a proposed residential development (known as Edwards Reserve) with a density of 5.51 dulac, located to the west within the City of Ft. Pierce and contiguous to the subject property. The City of Ft. Pierce provided the following comments regarding this project: · Rezoning: The proposed rezoning of the Orchid Place property from RS-4 to a PUD is inconsistent with the City's vision for the area. If the City were to annex the property at this time, the property would be annexed as R-1, single-family residential, with a density limited to four units per acre. The adjoining properties located to the west of the Orchid Place property were annexed into the city as R-1. · Use: The proposed use of the property for multi-family housing is inconsistent with the City's vision for land use in the area which is single-family residential. · Storm Water Retention: A storm water retention area is located along Edwards Road which does not comply with Section 22-187(9) of the City Code of ordinances. May 10,2006 Page 5 Subject: Orchid Place - PUD File: PUD-05-021 Staff has determined that the proposed zoning designation and the Preliminary Planned Unit Development site plan are compatible with the existing and proposed uses in the area. This petition is in conjunction with a request for a change in the future land use classification (PA-05- 011). The proposed RM (Residential Medium) Future Land Use classification would allow up to 9 dwelling units per gross acre. The project proposes a density of 9 du/acre. This petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and polices of the St. Luce County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that this petition be approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to Final PUD approval, the developer, his successors or assigns, shall provide St. Lucie County with an updated Transportation Impact Report (TIR), in accordance with Section 11.02.09(4) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Failure to demonstrate compliance with Chapter 5 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code shall constitute grounds for denial of the Final Site Plan. 2. A condition of approval of the Final PUD shall be that the developer, his successors or assigns, shall limit the hours of construction of the development between 7 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday and between 7 a.m. and 1 p.m. on Saturday. 3. A condition of approval shall be that at the time of final landscape inspection there will need to be 12 Cabbage Palms planted on the site. 4. The Director of Growth Management is authorized to issue a development order in such form as he may prescribe. No development shall occur and the project cannot obtain any permits until a development order is issued by the Director of Growth Management, or the person he designates in writing to issue the development order. The Development Order shall be recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida with the Resolution. 5. The resolution shall be recorded in order to provide constructive legal notice of development conditions that run with the land. The act of recording the resolution does not authorize development. All conditions of approval and applicable code requirements must be determined to be satisfied by the Director of Growth Management. 6. The Director of Growth Management shall obtain comments from the appropriate county staff, legal staff, and other responsible agencies regarding the satisfaction of all applicable code requirements and conditions of approval prior to issuing a development order. 7. The Department of Growth Management shall confer with the County Engineer, Public Works Department, Environmental Resources Department, and Utilities Department to determine the number of constructible engineering plans that shall be required to be submitted for review. The applicant shall, following notification by the Director of Growth Management, submit the required number of plans to the Department of Growth Management for processing, distribution, and final action. May 10. 2006 Page 6 Subject: Orchid Place - PUD File: PUD-05-021 8. No development order shall be issued by the Director of Growth Management until a complete set sealed constructible final engineering plans, supporting calculations and survey data for the site work and offsite improvements are approved by the Office of the County Engineer, Public Works Department, Utilities Department, Environmental Resources Department, Growth Management Department, Fire Department, and any other agency that may be determined by the Director of Growth Management to be necessarily involved in the review and approval of the constructible final engineering plans for the site work and offsite improvements. The determination of whether or not plans submitted by the applicant constitute a complete set of constructible plans shall be made by the departments involved in the plan review within five business days of the date the plans are received in the Department of Growth Management. 9. The Director of Growth Management is authorized to evaluate project concurrency, and to issue a certificate of concurrency upon his determination that all requirements for concurrency management have been satisfied. No Development Order shall be issued prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Concurrency. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution No. 06-057, which, if approved, would grant a change in zoning from the RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Orchid Place) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known as Orchid Place - PUD. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution No. 06-057. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. SUBMITTED: Bob Nix, AICP Growth Management Director ar cc: County Attorney Growth Management Director Public Works Director W. Lee Dobbins File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 RESOLUTION NO. 06-057 FILE NO.: PUD-05-021 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE RS-4 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY - 4 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE PUD (PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT _ ORCHID PLACE) ZONING DISTRICT AND PRELIMINARY PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS ORCHID PLACE - PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Sabin Companies. Inc., presented a petition for a Change in Zoning from the RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning Distriçt to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Orchid Place) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known as Orchid Place - PUD for a development of 80 multiple-family dwelling units in ten (10), eight unit buildings to be located on 8.9 acres on property on the north side of Edwards Road, approximately 650 feet west of South 25th Street. 2. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the Preliminary Planned Unit Development site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet all technical requirements and to be consistent with the future land use maps of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, subject to the conditions set forth in Part A of this Resolution. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 3. On April 20, 2006, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Change in Zoning from the RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development _ Orchid Place) Zoning District and Preliminary Planned Unit Development for the project to be known as Orchid Place - PUD, for the property depicted on the attached Maps as Exhibit "A" and described in Part B below. 4. On May 16, 2006, the St. Lùcie County Board of County Commissioners held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published and mailed to all property owners within 500 feet at least 10 days prior to the hearing, and granted Preliminary Planned Unit Development approval for the project to be known Orchid Place - PUD. File No.: PUD-05-021 May 16, 2006 Resolution No. 06-057 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 5. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities or other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. 6. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect on the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. 7. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 8. The multiple-family dwelling units of the proposed project will be served by Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA). 9. The applicant is not requesting to reserve roadway capacity with this preliminary development approval. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05(A) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plan for the project to be known as Orchid Place _ Planned Unit Development, and is hereby approved as depicted on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Houston Cuozzo Group, Inc., dated July 20, 2005, last revised October 6, 2005, and date stamped received by the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director on January 27, 2006, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to Final PUD approval, the developer, his successors or assigns, shall provide St. Lucie County with an updated Transportation Impact Report (TIR), in accordance with Section 11.02.09(4) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Failure to demonstrate compliance with Chapter 5 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code shall constitute grounds for denial of the Final Site Plan. 2. A condition of approval of the Final PUD shall be that the developer, his successors or assigns, shall limit the hours of construction of the development between 7 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday and between 7 a.m. and 1 p.m. on Saturday. 3. A condition of approval shall be that at the time of final landscape inspection there will need to be 12 Cabbage Palms planted on the site. 4. The Director of Growth Management is authorized to issue a development order in such form as he may prescribe. No development shall occur and the project cannot obtain any permits until a development order is issued by the Director of Growth Management, or the person he designates in writing to issue File No.: PUD-05-021 May 16, 2006 Resolution No. 06-057 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 B. 44 45 46 47 48 49 the development order. The Development Order shall be recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida with the Resolution. 5. The resolution shall be recorded in order to provide constructive legal notice of development conditions that run with the land. The act of recording the resolution does not authorize development. All conditions of approval and applicable code requirements must be determined to be satisfied by the Director of Growth Management. 6. The Director of Growth Management shall obtain comments from the appropriate county staff, legal staff, and other responsible agencies regarding the satisfaction of all applicable code requirements and conditions of approval prior to issuing a development order. 7. The Department of Growth Management shall confer with the County Engineer, Public Works Department, Environmental Resources Department, and Utilities Department to determine the number of constructible engineering plans that shall be required to be submitted for review. The applicant shall, following notification by the Director of Growth Management, submit the required number of plans to the Department of Growth Management for processing, distribution, and final action. 8. No development order shall be issued by the Director of Growth Management until a complete set sealed constructible final engineering plans, supporting calculations and survey data for the site work and offsite improvements are approved by the Office of the County Engineer, Public Works Department, Utilities Department, Environmental Resources Department, Growth Management Department, Fire Department, and any other agency that may be determined by the Director of Growth Management to be necessarily involved in the review and approval of the constructible final engineering plans for the site work and offsite improvements. The determination of whether or not plans submitted by the applicant constitute a complete set of constructible plans shall be made by the departments involved in the plan review within five business days of the date the plans are received in the Department of Growth Management. 9. The Director of Growth Management is authorized to evaluate project concurrency, and to issue a certificate of concurrency upon his determination that all requirements for concurrency management have been satisfied. No Development Order shall be issued prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Concurrency. The property on which this site plan approval is being granted is described as follows: THE WEST 742.98 FEET (8.9 ACRES) OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, File No.: PUD-05-021 May 16, 2006 Resolution No. 06-057 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE EAST 560.0 FEET, AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND LESS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TOGETHER WITH: THE WEST 520.0 FEET OF THE EAST 560.0 FEET OF SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 FEET AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND THAT CERTAIN PARCEL CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, FILED FOR RECORD, OCTOBER 12,1988 IN O.R.B. 607, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPTING THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN O.R.B. 1098, PG. 1842, AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. (Parcel Identification Number: 2420-443-0001-000/4.) (Location: North side of Edwards Road, approximately 650 feet west of South 25th Street.) C. This Preliminary Planned Unit Development Site Plan approval shall expire on May 16, 2008, unless an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(8)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code or Final Planned Unit Development Approval has been granted. D. The Preliminary Planned Unit Development Site Plan/General Site Plan approval granted under this Resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Sabin Companies, Inc., including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary development permits and construction authorizations from the appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities, including but not limited to: the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District, prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part B. E. The conditions set forth in Part A are an integral non-severable part of the site plan approval granted by this Resolution. If any condition set forth in Part A is determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the developer declines to comply voluntarily with that condition, the site plan approval granted by this Resolution shall become null and void. F. A copy of this Resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Part A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director. G. A copy of this Resolution shall be mailed, return receipt requested to the developer and agent of record as identified on the site plan applications. H. This Resolution shall be recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. File No.: PUD-05-021 May 16, 2006 Resolution No. 06-057 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward XXX Vice-Chairman Chris Craft XXX Commissioner Joseph E. Smith XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 16th day of May 2006. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS Deputy Clerk County Attorney ar H:\Development Projects 2005\PUD\ Orchid Place RES06057 .doc File No.: PUD-05-021 May 16, 2006 Resolution No. 06-057 Page 5 1 2 Exhibit A 3 4 5 Maps File No.: PUD-05-021 May 16, 2006 Resolution No. 06-057 Page 6 a. :J e (!) o N N o :J Ü C o ..- en :J o I ~ <: ;:) o Ü Q¡ > æ <: <0 'õ .E (.) C ~ C'\I o I L{) o £:) ::> a.. A... ~ll t~ ~ I .~ 1 '{~ ,l~ t \J\I§. co o o C\ «S .... z*" ~ N .. :II! (\ oc.0'3 P"1i:I IIII!I$ >- E ;:) o Ü <: :e <0 ::!E ~ _WI' uew ¡IIU_:;)J."H 3 ~ .- ,~tz'::I t ? ¡; Æluno:J eeqo4:>ee>¡0 - A petition of Houston CU. __.J Group, Inc. for a Rezor lIe 1;::1 to PUD and Site Plan Approval for an 80 unit multi-family townhouse project in the RS-4 (Residential, Single Family -4 du/acre) Zoning District þEAN Of ~ r I (/) f-- v YV'<Y'<Y II ~o?0$ UJ ~I \ \ 1 T ~ I-- f----; :;: r- ¡(O UJ IN ~,z (/) (/) ·····~~.,':\T .': ~. I r ·~ITBrNTLYRD ~ ø< ..; :: .:...:.:.......; .. (/) I I ~ ~ :B '(/) .... >. '-I : <:'.' ....... ::< r EE tEEE ., ::.... :' .. .. l ~ rn EE .: .'.. (/) L :... G) I (/) EE EE EB EB :B '.. ..... ;;0 I f-- _lI~ ..., 0 ~EE EE ... :::..:.\. < '.' m WILDWOOD LN_ ....... '7 0, I .:.: ..... 1;;0 I ~ UJ ) :' ::".:.., :' s: -I ~ ~ '.': ,\ ü f--- :":' :'.' ~ æ I-- '.' .' (/) « - - ~ ....: I :E ;:':'.: I b; « - f--- N æ COli: - ( ~ UJ ,..-CD ~N.JJ,N'" f--- .':. DF? - z~ '- '. y ...J :. < .... Q'- O' ..,:..... ".: '.: "<:.""':'. Ht I ~~ W BO~~R . ..................................7i. ---1 ~ (/) Q - r! - e-- (/) ~ . ..... <>.............................>.. - ~ 0 ~ I : f--- ~ I~L '. I-- f--- I .' i> 111 ~ EDWARDS RD ED.W~RD_s_':m L-. ....... . ~S~ARDSRD 1 [ ....'.. ···M «...:.~....~. /' L ~~ ~ I - ~.~ ¡(/).- I ,(/).-(j) ~Q I 10' z- , j·········.·.·....·.xr ~~ 'r! N '~:M ,N_ 1·...)6/ - ''''[j~ '-- '" - ~ - Q ~ !--- - ~ ~~ - / ~ Pffiffi I Q UJ Q ...J 0 ~ I iLlïBYï TE ~ SIBLE PUD 05-021 ~ Subject property 5è.Å~ a,~~_ N A (jrfJ"W11i .Mt27UWem.m1 ZJtyHlrhNml [7;:J;:'2] City of Ft. Pierce Map prepared February 16, 2006 Houston Cuozzo Group, Inc. ~ A ~J A ,,.J.- (I); - ~.~ v v'<Y ~ 1~r I ì~ r--. R~-4~: RS~ ~~0 _& (I) I (I) lÀ ú'~ ~[)::( ~ ~ - BRANTLY RD ~ 0-z¿ <0> g¡ r 1 ~ I , '<Y ~~( > RM-5 (I) ~ ~ i E ~~ ~ ~~ A I PU[f8 ~ ~ RS-4 æ ffi D - I I .~ ~ : 8383EE E83 WILDW.D9D¿LI':-J_ :r: ~ ~ -.-J L ~ I 3~ ~ - I----' _ 8~ ~<~ PUD c-~- ff~~ ~~- ~~' I CO I- ~ --R; 3-4 cP RS-4 '-- .:: .' '.:'.': .<~ ---;-: .."-." ...... '-1 ,j I ~ __ EDWARDS RD , .. .. "'~""'" .,.; '" /./1 ................... :.... ~".. ···.......:iz·.·%. Lo a:: C/) o a:: t3 ~ o w '0' 11 ~~ AJ; -1 1"-. "\. Zoning ro' bEAN Dfs:~ hb A W ""'~ ~'1 ,..~ c.: . .: ......,. ......,.......:. .......:... '.' ~R'~ .i·:·R1·. II... . :.' : :.: .': ::: '. . .,-:C ._: .:. ..; n'A··i \.).'."-' .':<,../. ~ -:::.' .. :.<.: ,.: ~> .....:.::....:.. ':: . RS-4 l :;0 .~ m :0 .:;0 í , ¡····.R1 :...:....:' .. ': f .... . ..... '. ~ ~. y . :'.' .... ':: :. .. ":.: .:' < ,:..... .. . R1 -. .:..': '. ........ ":'.::. ..... :'. ';. ". ~I~ ~ ,D RS-3 ~ PUD 05-021 . I ~ C/) :r: ~ m N C/) KE-. ." I u;:r- - - - CG '-- f--- CIJ - - _It.W.Bol~R o a:: C/) - 5bC" - O"~ ~ :r: - ü - ì [ EDWARDS RD _S EQW~RD,S.RD ~ ¡..:: ~ I ""' t\. f- (I). C/), I~' ~-~ -~-~ .... C/):""-- C/) """ L;C - ~S f-- f-- .....1- C/)- _0 ........ .. ~- ,.. T N_ C/) - - - - - - CG - -Rj.-4 IT æHH ELIZABETH AVE R~-# , Rßt41 - hi"" I ~r "t t-oi M-.... SIBLE RF RM-5 I I 9:- ~~ ~:1= (jrITWui ManOfltmU1lr :Deparhrumr N A ~ Subject property : ,.... '::i: City of Ft. Pierce Map prepared February 16, 2006 Land Use I=dEANr~~ w t-- ru! r- ~~ Q,;. ..":".~' ."" '1'::.:' · ·R..:·t·...·J·:·. ·R·::i:·, :"'.:,; _.,....- -L.;,; . ..:.:"> . '.' .:....... , · .·,bl .'. :.' r'L,;. .... , ..:. ·::':·i..:· ¡'....."',.> :. J':.........'.. :::.:.:. I : iRL:: :.... I,' ::::.:...:....::.: : >:".: ...:.:. .. :......:< '.'. ... · I·:', I· .""". "RL :." . .: :. .,.: ":"':, ...~ ~ RU PUD 05-021 Houston Cuozzo Group, Inc. = ~~ ~~þ ~ @'~~þ< ~ 0~~ iE EB ìlEE EE rn TI ~ : 8383Et BEE :I: ~ ~L Z .....II-- '''IVI _8_ o r-- 3: - r-- ffi - -175- r--- I- C/) J: I I .~ WILD.WQQD LN ~ 3: ü æ « ~ « ~ COV12N.4¡Nì DfT t; 1 J J: ~ 1 \ . l ;x¡ o RU .~ o ì , -.01 . .... t--- . \ I I 1 I- C/) J: I- en N .c/) .. KU ~~- ~ Subject property ¡?T.·Y:.:j City of Ft. Pierce I I I C/) _ BRANTLY RD ~ I I C/) -I [:11 . ..., - COM KU P/F CI\A " - c/)' :I:1 1-' CD: N C/)' ffi: - I-- - r--- i-- - - RU I- W, BOOTH DR t-- J:- o 0:: C/) - ~DI - 0·'.... -J: - Q z L EDWARDS RD -ª.. ED~~RI?_S. RD --- !¡:;. t; J: '----- o' r--¡..:. - 0::' --- ~'_ C') _ N, N C/) c--- C/) ·········i)··· ....... ......~, :RL ....... .' '; '., '. ....:............,':. '. ...... . ......... :,. ,..' EDWARDS RD .' I.... ~_ ---- ...... "~ :~I (' 0:: C/) o 0:: ~ o w '0' .....I o .... I RU l- I- r u I--- - - [- ~ ELIZABETH AVE I I I RU I I 5è.- ~~ a,~~þ, {jrð'Wrli .MlZ7Uf(¡emnrr 2JeparhNmr Map prepared February 16, 2006 - I - 1-- C/)- e--- Q nil I ¡;;¡- I"" N _ C/) t--- - -- I-- .... ~III T' I . SIBLE N A ..~~II~I;: .i. ,,!UI11- .. ..~ 4 I ..' _¡;..' ,I', 1tJI, . !I'. ~,- ~ -. '"'f' . ~ . . i-I i '. _ ...~t,~..' ;.~~~ . ~~j; .Ir_~, , ,"!, .' ': ~wl': - .:. ~- .''!'" ," . · : ì [3~. ,1 ...1:1" ..~'.-'./ .. .,......, .'; "", ". .., Y'~ ;:;; ."' ./.~A ,::' ..~,; ii. .~. ~n.' . ! \....~:+I'.~.. " :':''''l'.: :_'~,_" f::l, . 1II.!t]".., ].~~v. .. i ¿ ~/. - '" ..~:......: . II"'" :g ,... ,.' ~ ~.~ ¡ . æ ':C¡'...!.=' '~~,fl!!l'.ll!~.. ...... E~ì!~~~:~::,m] .,_.~ 1 .~~_ I ~1"~-:..·'~ï!!I!I' ...~iLi...~~~ L l· '1 .:~ . ~ , .~y~-" ~. ':.~- r:l1'J.,/;Ir, · I~.. ."'):...' ¡ ." rJ '"" 1III··'1t:r..: · . " . if ' ~.__ ~ r.t ' . . I (~;J."".. ..'." ,f.' t ''::'~Cj,. ''''I¡¡' ,,' : -' . ,,1f1!!.. \ ~ . ,,,,:,~.~. . ..' \, ' .', ì lU"'. "",":" .-...ø~ II. . 'n- ~~,. ' ; .' "I'I!IIII!' . ~.j.C.~,~~.~^.-C.~~'.~';':U.. ~ ___"". ~..r~~....III~:~~. 1 '4~,.., -"!,,"U~~,ii:;;¡~·~'i!,· .~' ~"'n.~II!. ."1"" .::::J.. . 'I', · l' ~~...~.;,~'*~..-..~~ ~ '~õI!"I. · .-... ,..." Iliï ~ ~~1 .Iü" rg~.'1', . ø ~. ;.Af'-~ .~'-. ' . " 'If· ...~' ,'.: IIíòI · ¡' -. :-" ~~' ." ~,'.'." 'lj:)'~~~.'~.:"'~~.;'~i~·~f'~:;~"~" ~. .:~~-' " r'Ji --IUII~¡ ~- .. __, ... ,'. ~r.?'¡' ..,... -"1 II1II. .~..:'. ~I . ;.~ f. ~y.:~' .,~..·~.,~A'· I~.· ~...~ -.'=':!.. " .._........, '1" '! ,; . " ,""'/';(""",'!;i¡f'" · · !!!I, I'i_ffi~ j. . ¡if , . k, ;;;,,;;.~;.,.;...1¡.;t;,:I, .toile ,~.. .!: = J; . t-.~~.- .J _~. .. ", < ". ,~' -.". ~~.f'~ . ~':;";. ..'t. .... \! ".'~' ." .", \ · ",. "" ~~.~. .o., ' . .' . . ~. ,. "". ,,< , .. . ,. .. . 11.....-IU:I..¡.,~:; ..' ~~~'.i- ..." ."":\I'~.~~':~.~_:_I!I,' ":'<~:~t~r .. Eî';~ -..¿;. \i' '" ~~iI::IC'~~rA '-C. ;;'.I..LI. .P¿~.iII.!Iiii -.~,.!!f.t!.. ";-'''''-'tI:.= - -~ ... ~'.'~ '; I ,.' . '. . ....IMAI... -. ¡ ~~.. i.. . í i ~;jjI. ~ t,I. 1;"':; i I ..," .IF.,:·II -< 1IIII\!kI-II~. ~,.,... IC!"'~'. ! ~¡ill~. ../~"". ~'l': ,.11.' '..~~ ~~':"'.:'.~~; .' I~ "' -'." 6' ==. ~ Ii.tiÌIII~ "';p;¡: ~., , " , . ,'" ";ç~"" III' !'" . ~"~""'~.~II' :-,"'.' ~: --:~ ,I!!I,IIII: \' .' '. ..;;"",,: .f; ~ "·lilI7·=i'·Ÿ .~{ ,œ' ~.F.J:".. ~'\':Iw. J,LL.}', r'' ~~:i\.(IG. ' ',"i' 't'. ' · ~4JL)'I,,, .~",. .,jj...... ,,~.JL I I¡!!-.J~ .,.! . 1- , ~~ ,:-,.,.IIit.'. ~:ri,.·JJ:"·:i.."",,,,,,,,-¡- ..I~I := , '. '.' : ,...~. . g'.. " <- ':f'. ., ..",.. · : .. :1:'" - " ." ~ ¡~~v. ~ .c'> ',- _'j~!IIL'III,J;IPI)" ·R·;"";' i- -:!:I' (j .¡ ~:.~ WI...~ , . . .il <'. . ....-. .¡: . . ..,. :"_, c, .LJ...~:J' Ii . 1.' ' _I.., ,,;¡e I"' . .....tol'.~.;.;. I~r ;;';'':t~ ~ t . '"' 1\"""'1 c.- ,¡ CI, .·I~', '. : . "':;';~I. ,._.J,'¡ ~ :.f. ,< ~:g~k(. . t!?~," ~f ~.~-:- II'!!"I. i.IÎ!·.r~' .lil,", III. ~ IW" ~II¡ jj "~ . /!"~~.iijìf~ -- ,,'" . "'...~ :"LI''>- : - '~'_:>...I!,,: ~,., ,r ~ ¿ ~,' : '.. .... . ...1'......,. "-- ,j . . "'-4l~ !..,~ '7 ~ ..A"·ì~"'~ '~ .-i_~ " E l'iD·'·· ." . ,. 1H1' .. ¡ . " iõ.'!I " III.¡ t <<": . f: :~~ '. .j,.> ~ ... 'P .' - -~ "- " N A PUD 05-021 ~ Subject property City of Ft. Pierce - Map prepared February 16, 2006 CITY OF FORT PIERCE 2005 Florida League of Cities "City of Excellence" Award Winner ZONING ADMINlSTRA TION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN HISTORIC PRESERVATION CUL TURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING "IMPROVING THE WA Y WE Do BUSINESS" To: FROM: RE: DATE: ANDREW RIDDLE, PLANNER PETER BUCHWALD, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ORCHID PLACE AND MARTIN SELF STORAGE MARCH 16, 2006 Due to workload and a shortage of staff, the City of Fort Pierce Planning Department can only provide the following general comments pertaining to the above-referenced project: Orchid Place · Rezoning: The proposed rezoning of the Orchid Place property from RS-4 to a PUD is inconsistent with the City's vision for the area. If the City were to annex the property at this time, the property would be annexed as R-1 single-family residential, with the density limited to four units per acre. The adjoniing properties located to the west of the Orchid Place property were annexed intot he city as R-1. · Use: The proposed use of the property for multi-family housing is inconsistent with the City's vision for land use in the area which is single-family residential. · Storm Water Retention: A storm water retention area is located along Edwards Road which does not comply with Section 22-187(9) of the City Code of ordinances. Martin Self Storaae · Zoning: The proposed use of the property for self-storage would require a conditional use permit for the zoning district (C-3) which this property would be zoned in the City. · Use: is inconsistent with the City's vision for land use in the area which is retail-oriented to service the residential development in the area. . Parking: The amount of parking provided does not comply with the City of Fort Pierce parking requirements for storage facilities. In the City's code, this use falls under the category of "manufacturing, wholesale trade and warehouse establishments." This requirement is one parking space for each 600 square feet of gross floor area." (Sec. 22- 60) The City's concern is that there is insufficient parking at one space for each 5,000 100 N. U.S. 1 0 P.O. Box 1480 0 FORT PIERCE, FL 34954-1480 0 772-460-2200 0 FAX 772-466-5808 MARCH 16,2006 PAGE 2 square feet as provided, and that parking spaces should be dispersed throughout the site for vehicular access to storage units. · Surveys and Trees: Property survey, tree survey and tree mitigation data was not provided. · Lighting: A lighting plan showing footcandles for the street, walkways and off-street parking is not provided. P.O. Box 1480 0 FORT PIERCE, FL 34954-1480 0 772-460-2200 04/27/2006 17:53 ZONING AOMINISTRATlON DEIlELOPUE/VT REVIEW COMPREHENSM PLANNINC URIAN o.SIGN H,sroflf/c PRU5I1VA17ON CUL ruRAL R~JOUItC!$ 772-466-5808 CITY OF FT PIERGE t-'Abt. ~1I t:J.L CITY OF FORT PIERCE 2005 Florida League of Cities "City of Excellence" Awan:1 Winner DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING "IMPROVING THE WAY WE Do BUS/NESS" April 27, 2006 VIA TELEF ACSIMILE PAGES: 1 Mr. Andrew Riddle St. Lucie County Growth Management Fax: 772.462.1581 Re: Request for Information on project densities SE corner of Edwards & Selvltz Corner of Edwards and Jenkins Dear Andrew: Your message from yesterday requested information on density for developments in the above-referenced areas. Below are listed four projects that have been approved by the City of Fort Pierce in those areas. Project Name Gator Lake Estates Neill Farms (KB Homes) Heritage Grande Mariner Cove location SE corner Edwards & Selvitz Bordered by McNeil (east), Jenkins (west), Okeechobee (north), Edwards (south) NE corner Jenkins & Edwards Total Units 12 single-family 214 single-family Density 1.6 dulsere 2.86 dulacre 100 duplex, 40 4-plex 40 single-family. 220 multi-family 6.38 dulacre SE comer Jenkins & Edwards 5.66 dulacre Please contact me if you would like additional information. 7~ Kara Wood Urban Designer .'. -~. ._-...._~.......-. --'-'- 100 N. U.S. 1 0 P.O. Box 1480 0 FORT PIERCE, FL34954-1480 0 77200460-2200 0 FAX 772-466~5808 Mr. Grande stated the commercial proposal for µart of this that is already commercial makes a lot of sense. Roll Call Mr. Grande - Yes to deny Ms. Caron - Yes Ms. Hammer - No Ms. Morgan - No Mr. Mundt - Yes Chairman Hearn - No Tie vote - 3 to 3 - Motion fails - Future Land Use Motion to approve by Ms. Caron, was seconded by ? Roll Call Ms. Caron - Yes to approve Mr. Grande - No Ms. Hammer - Yes to approve Ms. Morgan - Yes to approve Mr. Mundt - No Chairman Hearn - Yes to approve 4 to approve - 2 to deny -approved for land use amendment. Per Ch lrman Hean application will be forwarded to the Board of Commission with a recommendation of approval. A enda Item #3: Sabi Andrew Riddle, PI e from RS-4 Residential Single Family- 4 du/ac Zoning District to PUD -Planned t - Orchid Place Zoning District. The ~roperty is 8.9 acres located North side ofE ately 650 ft West of South 25t Street. Existing zoning is residential, single fam welling Its per acre. The surrounding zoning is residential, sin Ie famil 4 dwellin units er d UD Planned Unit Develo ment Lake Forrest Parks to the North. Commercial General to the and South and the Cit ofFt. Pierce to the West. The applicant proposes an 80 multi-f¡ y dwelling unit and 10- 8 unit buildings. The proposed plan is maintaining 4.26 acres. The proposed RM (residential medium) Future Land Use will allow up to 9 dwelling units per acre. Staff recommends that this petition be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval with a condition. Chairman Hearn will open the public hearing. See no-one, the public hearing is closed. Ken Natoli stated open space contains 2.62 acres includes the small grass area around the back, all green space, pool, community area and other open spaces all around the project. Chairman Hearn stated 7 AM is the starting time of construction. Ms. Caron stated working hours of construction are 7 AM to 5 :30PM, Monday through Friday and on Saturday, 7 AM to lPM. Charlie Sabin stated those working hours for construction are fine. Ms. Hammer had a concern of one way in and one way out. A condition of this commission's approval has to have another exit entrance. Mr. Nix stated staff will have the fire department review it and make comments and send it to the Board of County Commissioners. Ms. Caron commented regarding the price range of housing for the work force. 8 Charlie Sabin stated this project they were in the $l40K price range. Since then construction costs increased in the last 2.5 years. Hoping to keep price in the mid $200K. This is a concrete block building, not stick built, it is poured concrete. Mr. Sabin sticks to quality and hopes to keep the price down. Try to keep the price at that level. Attorney Dobbins stated it is currently zoned 4 units however it just received final P & Z approval for a density of 5.5 on the property to the west. Ms. Hammer made a motion to recommend to grant approval to the application of Sabin Companies, Inc. for a change in zoning from the RS-4 residential single family 4 zoning to the POD, Planned Unit Development - Orchid Place zoning district because it could be a transition project with conditions from the staff and also with the condition that another exit/entrance is added to the plan and the working hours be adjusted to Monday-Friday, 7AM to 5:30PM and Saturday, 7 AM to lPM. Seconded by Ms. Morgan. Mr. Grande stated he will not be able to support the motion because a project of this type is inconsistent with the neighborhood. Roll Call Ms. Hammer - Yes to approve Ms. Morgan - Yes Ms. Caron - Yes Mr. Grande - No Mr. Mundt - No Chainnan Hearn - Yes 4 - 2 to approve A enda Item #4: Sabin Co Andrew Riddle, Planner for the construction in the Commercial side of Edwards Road app petition be forwarded to the Chainnan Hearn opened the public Inc. abin Companies, Inc. for a Conditional Use Pennit to allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehousing trict. The property has 4.9 acres and is located on the North West of South 25th Street. Staff recommends that this Issioners with a recommendation of approval. eeing no-one, the public hearing is closed. Ms. Caron stated regarding the opaque nce is the wall of the actual unites). Charlie Sabin stated there are openings between the buildings and they may be some fencing between these openings. Mr. Dobbins stated there are no roadway contributions since the project will not be impacting the traffic. The level of service does not change. Mr. Grande made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that approval be granted for the application of Sabin Companies, Inc. for Conditional Use Pennit to allow for the construction and operation of a household goods warehousing and storage mini warehouse in the SG Commercial General Zoning district because it is consistent with the surrounding community and will help to offset the strain on the infrastructure caused by Orchid Place. This motion has been seconded by Mr. Mundt. Roll Call Mr. Grande - Yes to approve Mr. Munde - Yes 9 J. RS-4 RESIDENTIAL. SINGLE-FAMilY - 4 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable ~or single-family dwellings at a máXimum density of four (4) dwelling units per gross acre. together with such other uses as may be ne~ssary for and compatible with low, density resideptial, surroundings. The number .in ·0· following each identified use corresponds, to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(8). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Family day care homes. (999) , b. Family residential hom~s provided that such homes staall not be loca~ed.within a radius of . one thousand (1000) feet of another existing such family resld~ntial home and provided that ,', the sponsoring a~ncy or Department of Health and Áehab.ilitative Services (HRS) notifies' the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home. occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. (999) . c. Single-family detached dwellings. (999) 3. lot Size Requirements lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Sedion 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section- 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking Requirements Off-street parking requirements shalfbe in accordance with Section7.06.00. 6. Conditional Uses a. Family residential homes located within a radius of one ,thousand (1000) feet of another such family residential home. (999) , b. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Secti()n 7.10.23 (999) 7. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the ~equirements of Section 8.00.00. Sl Lucie COWIIy land De\eIopmenI Code Adopted August 1, 1990 3-18 . RëvIsecÏ"OwÖugh õsr151Ó4 7.01.00 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT 7.01.01 PURPOSE The Planned Unit Development (PUD) District is intended to achieve residential land deveJopment òf superior quality through the encouragement of flexibility and creativity in design options that: A. permit creative approaches to the development of residential land reflecting changes in the technology of land development; . B. allow for the efficient use of land, which can result in smaller networks of utilities and streets and thereby lower development costs; C. allow design options that encourage an environment of stable character, compatible with sur- rounding land uses; and D. permit the enhancement of neighborhoods through the preservation of natural features, the pro- vision of underground utilities, and the provision of recreation areas and open space. 7.01.02 AUTHORIZED USES A. PERMITTED USES Any permitted, conditional or accessory use in the Agricultural-1 (AG-1); Agricultural-2.5 (AG-2.5); Agricultural-5 (AG-5); Residential/Conservation in the Agricultural-1 . (AG-1); Agricultural-2.5 (AG., 2.5); Agricultural-5 (AG-5); Residential/Conservation (RC); Residential, Estate-1 (RE-1); Residential, Estate-2 (RE-2); Residential, Single-Family-2 (RS-2); Residential, Single-Family-3 (RS-3); Residential, Single-Family-4 (RS-4); Residential, Multiple-Family-5, (RM-5); Residential, Mobile Home-5 (RMH-5); Residential, Multiple-Family-7 (RM-7); Residential, Multiple-Family-9 (RM-9); Residential, Multiple-Family-11 (RM-11); and Residential, Multiple-Family-15 (RM-15) zoning districts of this Code may be permitted in a Planned Unit Development District su.bject to complying with the residential densities described in Section 7.01.03(B). B. NONRESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT USES Uses of the types permitted in the Commercial, Neighborhood (CN) District are also permitted up to an amount not to exceed three (3) percent of the gross arE~a of the Planned Unit Development or ten (10) acres, whichever is less. In addition, playgrounds, public and non-public parks, golf courses, country clubs, bicycle paths', racquet sports 'acilities, riding st~btes, marinas, clubhouses, and lodges may be permitted in a PI.anned Unit Development District. . 7.01.03 STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS Standards and requirements for a Planned Unit Development shall be as follows: A. MINIMUM SIZE A Planned Unit Development shall be a minimum of five (5) contiguous acres of land under common, ownership or control. B. DENSITY Sl lucie CounIy land Developmenl Code AdopIed August '. 1990 7-3 Revised Through ŒJ15r04 The maximum possible permitted density .of a Planned Unit Development shall nat exceed the density reflected in the Future Land Use Maps of the Comprehensive Plan. On Narth and Sauth Hutchinsan Island, the provisions .of Section 3.01 ;03{AA){S) shall øavern. C. AREA, YARD, AND HEIGHT REQUIREMENTS Area, yard, and height requirements shall be determined at the time of Preliminary and Final Development Plan approval, except that far any structurè on Narth .or Sauth Hutchinson Island that has not been occupied, constructed, or has nat received a building permit, site plan .or ather County develoi>m~nt approval as a permitted use prior to January 10, 1995 the requirements of Section 4.01.00, Hutchinson Island - Building Height Overlay Zone 'shall apply. D~ PUBLIC FACILITIES 1. The Planned Unit Development shall be designedandlocaied so there will be na net public , ,cost far the pravi$ian .of water lines, sewage lines, starm and surface drainage systems, and , other utility systems. ' . " ' " :: . ' 2. The minimum size of all, water mains used, .or' intended for use, in fire protection activities is six (6-) inches. Actual water main requirements will be determined by the St. Lucie County-Ft. Pierce Fire Prevention Bureau. 3. The minimum size of all wate,r mains used, .or intended for use, in fire pratection activities, that are iocated an a dead-end water 'main is eight (S·) inches. Actual water main requirements will be determined by the St. Lucie County-Ft. Pierce Fire Prevention Bureau. The maximum number .of fjre hydrants that may be located on any dead end water main is .one (1). 4. Fire hydrants shall be pravided at a ~inimum spacing .of .one every six hundred (600) feet unless otherwise approved by the St. Lucie Caunty-Ft. Pierce Fire Prevention Bureau. E. TRAFFIC AND PEDESTRIAN CIRCULATION 1. Every dwelling unit, .or other use permitted in the, Planned Unit Development ~hall have access to a public street either directly or through an appraved private road, a pedestrian way, .or ather area dedicated ta pUblic or private use., 2. , Principal vehicular aécess points shall be designed to permit smoath traffic flaw with Còntrólled tùming movement and minimum hazan's ta vehicular .or pedestrian traffic. Minor štreets wiihin the Planned Unit Developm'ent shall not be connected, ta streets outside the develapment so as ta encourage their use by through traffic. 3. The praposed Planned Unit Develópment shall be désigned sò that it will not create traffic cangestian on the arterial and collector roads surrounding:the project, or such surraunding colje~or ar,arterial roads shall be impr~ved so that they will not be adversely affected. 4. All non-residential lant1'uses within"the Planned Unit DevelopÎnent shall have direct access to a collector .or arterial street withaut creating traffic hazards .or congestion on any street. ' Sllucle County UncI [)eyeJopmenl Code AdapI8d Au¡jusl1. 1990 7-4 RlWised Through 05115104 , , , ,-, -- . , 5. Streets in a Planned Unit Development may be ded~cated to'public use or'rètained under private ownership. Said streets and assoCiated improvements shall comply with all pertinent County regulations and ordinances, however, variations to the standard minimum right-of-way widths may be considered as part of the Planned Unit Development if it is . shown to the satisfaction of the Board of County Commissioners, that the requested variation is consistent with the intent of the County's roadway construction standards and necessaty 191' the design of ,the Planned Unit Development: . All roads 'and streets shali intersect at an approximate ±50'angle of ninety degrees (90°) unless circumstances 'acce,ptable to St. Lucie County in~icate a iieedfora lesser angle of intersection.' ' ' 6. 8. Street jogs or centerline offsets between any local street or road with another loCal streèt or. ~oad,~hall,be no less than one hundred fifty f~et.(150). , , , The interseêtïon of any two local roads or streets with a Major Colledor or Arterial Roadway shall be. separated by a minimum distance of six hundred sixty feet (660), as measured . from centerline to centerline., 7. ',. . '" 9. Permanent dead-end streets' shall not exceed ,one thousand feet (1000) in length. Cul-de-sacs shall be provided at the end of all dead end roads or streets greater than five hundred and one (501) feet In length. The length of a dead-end street shall be measured along the centerline of the street from the its point of perpendicular intersection with the centerline of intersecting street to the end of the dead-end street or roadway. All cul-de-sacs shall have a minimum right-of-way diameter of one hundreçJ" (100) feet. . If the dead end roadway is five hundred (500) feet or less in length, a -V· or -T- type of turn around may be approved. If a dead end street i~ temporary in nature then a temporary cul:"de-sac shall be required until the roadway is connected to another street or road. In the center of the cul-de-sac an unpaved island, surrounded by a curb, improved with gra~and t~dscaplng that will not interfere with sight distance, .may be provided. Center islands shall have a diameter, of not less than seventeen' (17) feet, ~nless otherwise approved through the review of the Planned Unit Development.' - ' . 10. All. _ roadways" exchJsiye of interior parking. and access élisl,esareas, regardless of ownership, shall be .Iocated a minimum of ten (1 ~)Jeet from, al)Y .extf:tri,or building walls, except for security gate houses or similar security structures 10catØd, in" a private street or road right-of-way. . 11. Any. pedestri~. circulation system and iis related walkways shall. be insulated from the . vehicular s.treet system. This shall include, when deemed to be necesSary by the Board of . County. Commissioners, pedestrian ui1derpasses 9r overpa~sès in the vicinity of playgrounds and other recreation areas, local shopping areas, and other neighborhood " ' uses. whict) generate a considerable amount of pedestrian trélf,ic.; . . sa. Lude County Land Oevelopmenl Code AdDpIiIId August. t. 1990 - 7-5 R~ThI'oûQh ~5104 12~' Access points on all collector or arteriar streets serving aPlanned Unit Development shall be located and spaced so that traffic moving into and out of the arterial streets do not cause. traffic congestion. i=: - PARKING AND LOADING 1. General Provisions a. The number, type, and location of parking Š'paces shall be determined at the time of final Planned Unit Development plan approval. The determination of the number , öf spaCes required shall be based on Section 7.06.01 (F) of this Code. The number of parking spaces required by this section may be reduced based on substantial competent evidence that the reduced number of spaces is adequate for the , proposed use or that parking may be shared by proximate uses that operate at different times or on different days. - ¡ b." Reserv'edparking spaces may be provided, in lieu of paved spaces, subject to Section 7.06.02(C) of this Code. ' 2. Off Street Parking and Loading ,Off.street parking and loading requirements are governed by Sections 7.06.02 and 7.06.03 'of this Code, and the following standards: a. Off-street parking and loading areas shall be designed to provide travelways between adjacent uses while discouraging through traffic. b. Off,¡street parking and loading areas shall be screened from adjacent roads and \pedestrian walkways with hedges, deri~èplanting, or changes in grades or walls. 3. On $t~eet Parking In Planned Unit Developments, on street parking may be used so long'as the road on which the ôn~street parking is proposed lies entirely within the limits 01 the defined Planned Unit . Development and such parking would' not contravene any other provision of thi~ Code or' the'SI. Lucie County Code of Ordinances. Where sUCh on street parking and loading is -. ...- ,used, it shall be consistent with the following design ,standards: -, a. The minimum size of a parking stall shall be ás follows: ~. parallel àngled· , -". . : handicapped (parallel) ., . -handicapped(angled) 8 feet X 23 feet , tOleet X '18 feet 12 feet X23 feet· 12 feet X 18 feet . .~-. 1 , . 'b. : , -Händicapped parking spaces shall be appropriately marked. .', :'h c. Access for emergency fire vehicles shall be in-accordance with NFPA standards. St. L~ çounty Land Development Code AdDpI8èf August 1. 1990 7-6 Rriised through 05115104 -- d.. No more than fifteen (15) parking spaces sh,all be permitted in 'a continuous row without being interrupted by a minimum lands~pe ~rea of 36Ó, ~quare feet. G. LIGHTING , ' All lighting facilities shall be arranged in such a manner so as to prevent direct glare or hazardous interference of any kind to adjoining streets or properties: H. LANDSCAPING AND" NATURAL F~TURES . . . ....:. 1.: .Native ,trees and 'vegetation and other natural features ,sh~II' be preserved to the extent practi~ble. 2. All senSitive environr:nentaJ,vegetation, trees and areas .shall:"þ'~ 'preserved to the extent practicable. ' " . < ¡ , 3. Landscapingfor off-s~reet parking and loading areas sballme~t the minim,um requirements of Section 7.09.00. .1. OPEN SPACE STANDARDS 1. A Planned !Jnit Development that is proposed.in ,any Re~ictel1tia~ .çonservation, Special District or Mixed Use Future Land Use .cCiteg()ry shall conform to the following open space standards: a A minimum, of thirty-five (35) percent of the gross are~ Ó, land to þe committed to a Planned Unit Development must be for use as corrimon open space. which may , include, parks, recreation areas, bicycle and peØe~t~ian paths and facilities, 'marinas, swimming beaches, common open space, common landscaping and planting areas, or other areas of public purposes or use other than street, road ,or drainage rights-of-way, above ground utilities, excluding stormwater t~eatment facilities, and parking areas. , " , .' : ì' A minimum of 15 percent of a"y existing native upl¡;!,~d habjt~t on the property must be preser:vedin, its ,natural condition,as part' of the' require(j ,35 percent common open space. For each acr~ of, preserved native habit~~~ above the required minimum 15 perc~nt that is prese,rved in its original $tate,~credit shall be given at a rate of 150 percent per acre towards the remaining common open space require.m~nt..,'" .;" ¡ All ar,eas to be dedicated for common open space shall be identified as,part of the, Preliminary Development Plan for the Planned Unit Deyelopment. Areas that are' flooctways, låkes, wetlands, and stormwater reten,tion, areas may be applied to satisfy the total common open space requirement, 's!Jbje&t to the requirement that 15% of any existing native' habitat on the properiÿ must be included as part of the required :~% common open space. ,As part, ()f. . the Fin~1 Planned Unit Døvelopment submission process, the developer or petitioner for the Planned Unit Development shall provideJor one of the following: - . "-- -. Sf. lucie CounIy Land De¥eIDpmenI Code MapIød AugUst 1. 1990, 7-7 ~~~~ 1. The advance dedication of all common open space to a public. or acceptable private. agency that will. upon acceptance, agree to maintain the common open space and any buildings. structures or improvements that have been placed on it. All such dedications or conveyances shall be completed prior to the issuance of any building permits, including land clearing, for any portion of the Planned Unit Development ;or. 2. A phased'conveyance of the land to a public or acceptable private agency· that will, upon acceptance, agree to maintain the common open space and any buildings, structures or improvements that have been placed on it. The schedule for the phased conveyance of any such lands to be used for common open space shall be a specific condition of approval for the Planned Unit Development. b. No parcel of land identified for use as a park or common open space. shall be less than one (1) contiguous acre, and all such areas shall be physically part of the Planned Unit Development. c. Areas provided or reserved to meet any other environmental preservation or protection requirement of this code or other lawful regulatory authority may be counted towards the overall common open space requirement. pròvided that the common open space meets the requirements of this Code. 2. A Planned Unit Development that is proposed in any Agricultural Future Land Use Category shall conform to the following open space standards: . a. ... For any Planned Unit Development, equal to or less than 160 acres in gross area and involving eight (8) or less lots or parcels, a minimum of 50% of the gross land area to be committed to the planned unit development must be for use as open space, of which 35% of the gross land area is to be retained as common open space. For the purpose of this paragrapþ, open space. in an agricultural PUD, including the required common open space, may include. parks, bicycle and pedestrian paths and facilities, marinas, swimming beaches, common recreation areas, common open space. common landscaping and planting areas. pastures and productive agricultural areas which may be held in either common interest, individual interest. or other areas of public purpose or use other than street. road,' , or drainage rights-of-way. common parking, areas and ,above ground utilities, excluding stormwater treatment facilities. . . For any Planned Unit Development. greater 160 acres in gross area or eight (8) divisions, a minimum of 80% of the gross land area to be committed to the planned unit development must be for use as open space, of which a minimum of 35% of the gross land area is to be retained" as common open space which may include. parks, recreation areas. bicycle and pedestrian paths and facilities. marinas. swim- ming beaches. common open space, common landscaping and planting areas, ,or other areas of public purpose or use other than street. road or drainage rights-of-way, above ground utilities, exCluding stormwater treatment facilities, and parking areas. sa. Lucie CcuIIr Land DIMoIopftIlNll Code ...~ 1.1!18O 7.8 Revised TJwough 05/'151'04 b. A minimum of fifty (50) percent of any existing native upland habitat on the property, must be preserved in its natural condition as part of the required open space." For each acre of preserved native habitat above the required minimum 50 percent that is preserved in its original state, credit shall be given at a rate, of 150 percent per acre tc;>wards the remaining open space requirement. c. All areas to be dedicated for open space 'shall be, identified as part of the Preliminary Development Plan for the Planned Unit Development. Areas that are floodways, lakes. wetlands. and stormwater retention areas may be applied to satisfy the total open space requirement. subject to the requirement that 50% of any existing native habitat on the property must be included as part of the required "" 80% open space. As part of the Final Planned Unit Development submission process, the developer or pe.titioner for the Planned Unit Development shall provide fpr one of the following: 1. The advance dedication of all, open space to a public. or acceptable private. agency that will. upon acceptance. agree to maintain the open" space and á"y buildings. structures or improvements that have been placed on it All such dedications or conveyances shall be complefed prior to'theissuance of any building. permits. iJicluding land clearing. for any portion of the Planned Unit Development; or. 2. A phased conveyance of the land to a public or acceptable private agency , "' ilia" will. upÐn acceptance.. agree to maintain the open space and any buildings. structures or improvements that have been placed on it. The schedule for the phased conveyance of any such lands te;> be used for open" space shall be a specific condition of approval for the Planned Unit Development; or. "3. The identification of restrictive easement or plat dedication that would serve to creáte a perpetual cònservation or use restriction easement over those portions of the properties that are to be kept as open space meeting the requirements of this section d. " No parcel of land identified fóruse as "a open space shall be less than one (1) contigOous acre. and all such areas shall be physically part of the Planned Unit Development. '-., e. Areas provided ,or reserved to meet any other environmental preservation or protection requirement of this code or other lawful regJlatory authority may be counted towards the overall open space requirement, provided that the þpen space meets the requirements of this Code. J. . SETBACKS FROM AGRICULTURAL LAND Planned Unit Developments adjacent. to land used for agricultural purposes. or designated for .. agricultural use on the Future Land Use Map of the St. Lucie County"Comprehensive Plan, shall i." providè'setbacks from the agricultural laoo sufficient to protect the function and operation of those uses frOrTlthe encroachment of Urban activities or uses. ." sa. LIÁ ~ IMxt DtnreIoprnønI Code /IdapIId Augusl1. 1990 7-9 . -. . Revised Through 05115104 K CLUSTERING OF DEVELOPMENT . . . Planned Unit Developments in all Future land Use Categories are'required to design the project 'in a clustered manner. Planned Unit Developments in the R~sidential. Conservation, Special District or Mixed Use Future' . Land Use Categories are required to design the project in a clustered manner that will reduce the cost of required infrastructure,. provide for large inter grated common open space areas, and provide for reduced long term maintenance costs for the community. In the Agricultural land Use Cat~gories clustered development is 'iniended to reduce the cost of required public infrastructure. L. PHASING , 1.: A Planned Unit Development maybe developed in more than one stage or phase. . . , , 2. If a Final Development Site Plan approve~ by the Bo~rd of County Commissioners is to be developed in stages or phases, each suçces~ive phase shall be ~onstructed and developed in a reasonably continuous fashion. No more ttlan two (2) years shall elapse between the completion of any stage or phase, and the final. stage ,or phase shall be completed within ten (10) years of the date of Final Development Site Plan approval. Extensions of the above requirements are subject to approval by.the Board of County Commissioners. Unless otherwise amended by the Board of . County, Commissioners through the Final Development Site 'Plan review process. the following sequence of development must be 'adhered to: a. One or more major recreation facilities antt other major amenities, planned to serve the entire development. shall be completed or adequate security posted prior to the· issuance of building or mobile home permits. of more than forty (40) percent, or , other percentage', as determined by the Board to be appropriate based on circumstances that include the size 9f tile project and the proposed phasing schedule, of the total number of autho.rized, dwelling units. Recreation facilities or facilities and other amenities planned to serve one (1) phase of a multi-phased development shall·be completed or appropriate security posted prior to issuance of building or mobileJwme, permits or the recording, of any final plat within th~t phase. .' b. No commercial facility shall be permitted priqr to the completion of at least forty (40) "percent of the total number of authorized dwelling l.!nits;,and, . .. c. For Planned Unit Developments to be constructed in stages or phases. the net density of an individual stage or phase may vary from the approved Final Site Plan subject to the requirements in Section 11.02.05. M. ' SIGNS . . ':' 1. " Signs within any' Planned Unit Development. ' less than or equal t9 200 acre~ in overall area. shall comply with the provisions of Chapter 9 of this code. provided hO\y'e.ver. that the Board Sl LudII CounIy Land DøwIopmenI Code Adai*d August " 1990 7-10 . , -.. ~..'. A!MsedTtiicíugti ci5I15IM 2. of County Commissioners may condition approval of a Planned Unit Development upon compliance with more stringent sign regulations in order to ensure ·design consistency throughout the proposed development, to ensure compatibility with surrounding land uses, to ensure public safety and prevent public harm, and to ensure compliance with the St. Lucie CountY Comprehensive Plan. Signs within any Planned Unit Development, greater than 200 acres in overall area may submit a generalsignage' plan for the Pianned Unit Development, as part o' the Final Planned Unit Development Plan submissions. The general signage plan shall be based on the general dimension and size standards applicable to other similarly designated residential property; provided, however, that the Board of County Commissioners may condition approval of a Planned Unit Development upon compliance with more stringent sign regulations in order to ensure design Consistency ·throughout the proposed development, to ensure compatibility with surrounding land uses, to ensure public safety and prevent public harm, and to ensure compliance with the St. Lucie County, Comprehensive Plan. ., ~..' '_'~"~'..... .' 'w ._._.._ h sa. LucIe Cou1Ir Land Developmønl Code AdiIpIId AugIet 1. 1990 . 7-11 ~~Q5I1w. Ms. Morgan - Yes to approve Mr. Mundt - No Chairman Hearn - Yes to approve 4 to approve - 2 to deny Approved for Change in Future Land Use amendment. Per Chainnan Hearn the application will be forwarded to the Board of County Commission with a recommendation of approval. Y-Agenda Item #3: Sabin Companies. Inc. Andrew Riddle, Planner, Change In Zoning from RS-4 Residential Single Family- 4 du/ac Zoning District to PUD -Planned Unit Development - Orchid Place Zoning District. The ~roperty is 8.9 acres located North side of Edwards Road approximately 650 ft West of South 25t Street. Existing zoning is residential, single family, 4 dwelling units per acre. The applicant proposes an 80 multi-family dwelling unit and 10- 8 plan is maintaining 4.26 acres. The proposed RM (residential m up to 9 dwelling units per acre. Staff recommends that this p . County Commissioners with a recommendation of approv Chairman Hearn asked if there are any questions of . t buildings. The proposed ) Future Land Use will allow forwarded to the Board of ition. Ms. Hammer stated what would help in the future is a m so that the committee members can look at it n they are Ms. Caron asked if Fronterra has been approv . Kelly approved for Fronterra. The preliminary is app is county with everything penned in 'ng the applications. ed the final PUD is not yet Chairman Hearn will open the p no-one, the public hearing is closed. Ken Natoli, Site Planner, Easte d open space contains 2.62 acres includes the small grass area around pace, pool, community area and other open spaces all around the project. C is the starting time of construction. Ms. Caron stated working ho e to 5 :30PM, Monday through Friday and on Saturday, 7 AM to lPM. Charlie ose working hours for construction are fine. Ms. Hammer had a concern of one way in out. A condition of this commission's approval has to have another exit entrance. Mr. NI ed staff will have the fire department review it and make comments and send it to the ard of County Commissioners. Ms. Caron commented regarding the price range of housing for the work force. Charlie Sabin stated originally they were in the $l40K price range. Since then construction costs increased in the last 2.5 years. He is hoping to keep price in the mid $200K. Attorney Dobbins stated it is currently zoned 4 units, however, the final P & Z approval was just received for a d.ensity of 5.5 on the property to the west. Ms. Hammer made a motion to recommend to grant approval to the application of Sabin Companies, Inc. for a Change in Zoning from the RS-4 Residential Single Family 4 Zoning to the PUD, Planned Unit Development - Orchid Place Zoning district because it could be a transition project with conditions from the staff and also with the condition that another exit/entrance is added to the plan and the working hours be adjusted to Monday-Friday, 7AM to 5:30PM and Saturday, 7AM to lPM. Seconded by Ms. Morgan. Mr. Grande stated he will not be able to support the motion because a project ofthis type is inconsistent with the neighborhood. 6 Roll Call Ms. Hammer - Yes to approve Ms. Morgan - Yes Ms. Caron - Yes Mr. Grande - No Mr. Mundt - No Chainnan Hearn - Yes 4 - 2 to approve Change in Zoning Agenda Item #4: Sabin Companies. Inc. Andrew Riddle, Planner, petition of Sabin Companies, Inc. for a Conditional Use Pennit to allow for the construction and operation of a household goods warehousi d storage mini~warehousing in the Commercial General Zoning District. The property has 4. s and is located on the North side of Edwards Road approximately 250 ft West of South 2 t . Staff recommends that this petition be forwarded to the Board of County Commissio ommendation of approval. oning Commission recommend that approval be ies, c. for Conditional Use Pennit to allow for the ods warehousing and storage mini warehouse in the . ct cause it is consistent with the surrounding community e infrastructure caused by Orchid Place. This motion has been Mr. Hearn asked if there were any questions for the Chainnan Hearn opened the public hearing. Seeing no-o Ms. Caron stated regarding the opaque fence 1 Charlie Sabin stated there are openings betwee between these openings. Mr. Dobbi ted, ther will not be impacting the traffic. of serv Mr. Grande made a motion that tlì granted for the applicati construction and ope SG, Commercial G and will help to offset t seconded by Mr. Mundt. Roll Call Mr. Grande - Yes to approve Mr. Mundt - Yes Ms. Hammer - Yes to the motion except for the part about the strain on the community. Ms. Morgan - Yes Ms. Caron - Yes Chainnan Hearn - Yes Unanimously approved for the Conditional Use Pennit. Agenda Item #6: Michael Brvant: Linda Pendarvis, Planner, this is a petition of Michael Bryant's request for a Change in Zoning from RS~2 Zoning District to the AG-l Zoning District for property located on the West side of Bennet Road, 1950 ft South of Peterson Road to allow for the grazing of his personal horses. Michael 7 MNO~~V~O~~ ONN ~ --_O~ MM~~Ò~~_~~ (1;M- N mm~~~ ~~~~~~~~9~ ~~~ ~ ~~~~~ ~N~~~~~~~~M~N~~~~m~~mmoo MM ~~~~~~~~~m~~~~mm~~g~~M~~~ Ñ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~gg ~ =~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~«~~~~~ V<~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ J!J! III 1II"fi ~~ ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~ê~Æê~êê~~~~~ê~~ ££££££££t£~£££~C£!££jjll£££ðt ~tttttttt§tttttt~t~ttttEEtttÉ§ u~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~88~~~~~ ~ I~ ¡ ,~ ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ æ~; ~~ ~~ ~ -~ tJ ~~~~ ~ ~ 5 ~05 ~~ II ~~ii ~~ Ë~~ ~ Ë§~~~~ð = E~EEIII!~~~~ë~ œ<~~~~~ ~æ~< õ _m~ ~~øw2< ~~(.)ooooË ~~(.)~~~~tJ~oM88 -£££~o ~-IIIIIIIIIIIIIII ~~III-c~aS~III- J!S~~~..~ w£o»»~~w~oli~~ ~III>Ø~~CC~~~~!! 0~~~eeee~ø~(.)~15~ N~eMIIIIII~~~~~~o ~Õ5(.)~~~~wðÕ~(.)5w~tJtJz~ð~~«tJtJtJtJR ~oo~mmwm~m~ ~o~wo~~omm~oo~~~o~ ~000000~~0~NOON8~~oro~m~~NNNo~ ~~~~æ;æNæ~g~~~g~~æ~æ~~~~~~~~~~ III E ~ C ~ Ii:! III C ~ o III E III C ..J Ii:! III C ~ o C a¡ j ~~:¡ ~>~ 'õ ~ !! :::III~ <~tJ III 'C ~ ~ ~ ~ Qj C> C < tJ ï: o ~ 1? C ~ o C o o o 8 en ~ t/)C:= i§~~ E E ~ ~ C 'ë- ~ ~ "' III E ~ ~ III E ~ ~ C ~ ~ 8 < ~~ ~ t: "' ~~~ a::~¡g~ III t III III ~ '2 i! .g .2 C ~ EE~~a¡~~= C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,- ~ 0 0 0(,) ~~~ ~~o a:: a:: w.s: Ñ:8 q:;:: '" - q~ O~ :J~ 11. 2 ~iI .~ §-l! e III C)og ... o III ~ :: 01: ::I Q. (.)Q. c< s~ !!& :îe ...11. .2E CIIe c... ]j~ -1: 0111 11. ~ -co (.)(.) ~~ o ....~~ :;:j ~~EE 0 E ~~EE .5 ~ g ¡g ~88 ci. o ~ u~ 00__ o~ .5 ~ ~.58 ~~~~ .5e ~ ã 8. E'" tJ cìS E E rñ~ III ~ 8. el~ e 1? äJ £ ,~.~ ~ ~ .~ ~ E § ~§ ~I--gt EEIIIIII ~o 5 8£~~ '~8 ~~III~ ~'~~~~~~~8 t:"'~~~~- 0 ~~~ ~§~~",co'~§§~~~8c ! ~8 g ~ E E 8 "' ~ § 0 ~ ~ g ê ~ ~ 'w g IIIE ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ a:: a:: a:: .5 ~ ~...~lgg!i~i=S~~~ei~~~~oo~~~~~~~ O(.)tJw~~O<>I-~otJtJ~(')~~w~~~~»zzztJ~ ~8~8~~~80~0~~88~~~0~0~0~888 888888888808808888888888888 ~O~~NMV~O~~~NNvN~~~m~M~~ooO 8~88gooo~~~8go~~o8oo8888888 0000000000000000000000000000_ _~NMOOOO~~~~~N~~~j~O~~~N~800C ~~~~mm~~~~~~ ~~~~ ;ø~~~~~ogg~_ Ooo~oooomm~~~ò~~m oo~~~òòoool~:::r. ~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN800 _ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ Treasure Coast Newspapers ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA MAY 16.2006 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Sec- tion 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Devel- opment Code and In accordance wlth the provi- sions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan that the following applicants have request- ed that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners considers their following re- 1. q~I~~~EL BRYANT for a Change in Zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-l'amlly - 2 Clu/ac) Zoning District to the AG -1 (Agricultural - 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the fo!lowing de- scribed property: 13 35 39 THAT PART OF S 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF NE 114 LYG ELY OF E R/W 1-95-LESS S 42.5 FT- (5.75' AC) (OR 692-2732). Location: West side of Bennet Road. approxi- mately 1.950 feet south of Peterson Road. 2. HALF HOUR CUSTOM AUDIO AND ACCESSORIES for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the opera- tion of a Motor Vehicle Repair Service - Body Repair In the CG (Commercial, ,General) Zoning District for the following d,escrlbed property: LEXINGTON SQUARE LOTS 13 AND 14 (1.34 ÀC) (OR 2051-182). Location: 6900 Heritage Drive, PorlSt. Lucie. , Florida. 3. SABIN COMPANIES, INC. fór a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a h.ousehold goods warehousing and storage mini-ware- house facility in the CG (Commercial. General) Zoning District for the following described nl'lo~a¥~ 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE'40 EASTþST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCE TING THE EAST 560.0 FEET. AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR CANAL RIGHT OF 'WAY AND LESS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TOGETHER WITH: THE WEST 520.0 FEET OF, THE EAST, 560.0 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 FEET AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND THAT C,ERTAIN PAR- CEL CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI- DA, FILED FOR RECORI), OCTOBER 12, 1988 IN O.R.B. 607, PAGE 27, PU,BLIC RECORDS OF ST. LU- CIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT- ING THAT CERTAI,.. PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN O.R.B. 1098, P,AGE 1842. AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI- DA., LESS THE WEST 742.98 FEET (8.9 ACRES) THEREOF. Location: North side of Edwards Road, approxi- mately 250 feet west of South 25th Street. 4. SABIN COMPANIES, INC for a Change in, ~onlng from the RS - 4 (Residential, Single-Family - " du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Plann!!d Unit Development - Orchid Place) Zoning D!S- trict and Preliminary Planned Development Site 'Plan Approval for the following described prop- erty: THE WEST 742.98 FEET (8.9 ACRES) OF THE FOL- LOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: THE SOUTH 1/2 f¿F THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 vF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTHËsRANGE 40 EAST ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, L S AND EX- CEPTING THE EAST 560.0 FEET, AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND LESS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TO- GETHER WITH: ' THE WEST 520.0 FEET OF THE EAST 560.0 FEET OF THE SOUTH l/20F THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 FEET AND TH~ NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WAY AND THE CERTAIN PAR- CEL CONVEYED TO'THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI- DA. FILED FOR RECORD, OCTOBER 12. 1988 IN O. R. B. 607, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LU- CiE COUNTY. FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT- ING THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN O.R.B. 1098, PAGE 1842. AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI, L~~tion: North side of Edwards Road, approxi- mately 650 feet west of South 25th Street. Tuesday, May 2,2006 5. TAILERS' COVE DEVELOPMENT, LLC for a Change In Zoning from the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Tallers' Cove) Zon- ing District, and Preliminary and Final Planned , Development Site Plan Approval for the follow- Ing described property: THE NORTH 400 FEET OF PARCEL G. F.E. ENGLER'S PLAT OF SURVEY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, AT PAGE 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING WEST,OF STATE ROAD A-1:A. Location: West side of South SR A+A, directly across from Atlantis I Condomlniúms I' 6. CHARLES AND PEGGY WARD for a Change in Zon Ing from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single -Fami- ly - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR - 1 (Aqr- Icultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the following described property: 13 35S 39E 13 35 39 N 1/2 OF N 1/2 OF S 1/2 OF NE 114 OF NE 114 -LESS W 2 AC OF SD N 1/2 OF S 1/2 OF NE 1/401' NE 1/4 AND LESS E 550.01 FT - (1.92 AC) (OR 1000-81: 1005-2109: 1204-1397) 13 3SS 39£ 13 35 39 W 510.01 FT OF E 550.01FT OF N 1/2 OF N 1/2 OF 5 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 (1.93 AC) (OR 528-1343, 1344: 1017-2312: 1204-1398) Location: ,i245 South Jenkins Road. Fort Pierce, Florida. 7. JOHN WARD for a Change In Zoning from the RS -2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zon- Ing District to the AR - 1 (Agricultural, Residen- tial - 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the following described property: ' THE PARCEL CONTAINED WITHIN: THE SOUTH. 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF TflE NORTHEAST 114 OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 13. TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THE WEST 2 ACRES OF THE SAID NORTH 112 OF THE SOUTH 1/2,01' THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHE,AST 1/4 OF SEC- TION 13, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM, ROAD RIGHT - OF -WAY. Location: 1275 South Jenkins Road, Fort Pierce, Florida. The PUBLIC HEARING on this Item will be held in the Commission Chambers. Roger Poitras An- nex, 3rd Floor, St. Lucie County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Flori- da on May 16, 2006. beginning at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. Action can be tak- en at this meeting, or the Item can be continued to a future date and time. ' All Interested persons will be gillen an opportuni-, ty to be heard. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be con- sidered. Written comments to the Board of County Commissioners should be received by the Growth Management Department -, Planning Division at least 3 days prior to the, scheduled hearing. The petition flle Is available for review at the Growth Management Department offices located at 2300 Virginia Avenue.. Fort Pierce, Florida. Please call 772/462-2822 If you have any guestlons or reguire additional Information. The flle for this proJect may be Inspected prior to the hearing date In the Growth Management Department, 2300 Virginia Avenue, 2nd- Floor. Fort Pierce Florida. ' ' , T,he St. Lucie County Board of County Commis- sioners has the power to ,review and grant any applications within their area of responsibility. The proceedings of the Board of County Commis- sioners are electronically recorded. -PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105. Florida Statutes, If a person , decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a 'record ,of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to, ensure that a verbatim record of, the proceedings Is made, which record Includes the testimony and evi- dence upon which the appeal Is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceed- Ing, Individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding ~III be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any Individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If It becomes necessary, a public hear- ing may be continued from time to time as may , be necessary to a date'certaln. AnYOne, with a disability requiring accommoda- tion to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty,elght (48) hours prior to the meet· ing at 772/46'J..1777 orT.D.D. 772/462-1428. ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /5/ DOUG COWARD, CHAIRMAN PUBLISH DATE: May 2, 2006 Publish: May 2, 2006 1384761 1\ " -. To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Agenda Request Item Number Date: 51£"""" 05/16/06 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ X ] Presented By k_ {; L,.A ~ ~, ~Gro~ M~ement oi~~ Consider Draft Resolution 06-058 granting a Conditional Use Permit and Major Site Plan Approval for the construction and operation of a household goods warehousing and storage-mini-warehousing in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. Board of County Commissioners Growth Management Sabin Companies, Inc. has applied for a Conditional Use Permit and Major Site Plan for the construction and operation of a household goods warehousing and storage-mini-warehousing in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. The subject property is located on the north side of Edwards Road, approximately 250 feet west of South 25th Street. (File No.: CU-05-011/MJSP-05-018) N/A At the April 20, 2006, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission. by a vote of 6 to 0 with three members (Mr. Lounds, Mr. Knapp, and Mr. Trias) absent, recommended approval of the requested conditional use permit. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 06-058. Approved 5-0 Motion to include additional landscaping of five trees and the use of washable paint. COMMISSION ACTION: [jJ APPROVED D DENIED L=:J OTHER CURRENCE: Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator 8Y" County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget: ~ Environ. Res. Division: ~ Purchasing: Other: Transmittal Master Checklist Martin Self Storage - Major Site Plan & CU Primary Distribution Sent Environmental Resources Department, Amy Mott: x Public Works Surveyor - Ron Hams: x Road, Bridge, & Transportation - Scott Herring: x Stonn-water Management - Chris Lestrange: x General Engineering - Kyle Croce: x Attorney Prop Acquisition - loAnn Riley: x Sheriff's Department - Major Monahan: x St Lucie County Fire District - Captain Derek Foxx: x Geoe:raDhical Based City of Fort Pierce - Kara Wood: x Received x x x x x x x x x Commission Review: May 16, 2006 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners Bob Nix, AICP - Growth Management Director ~ 0~ THROUGH: FROM: Andrew Riddle, Planner r;A; DATE: May 10, 2006 SUBJECT: Application of Sabin Companies, Inc., for a Conditional Use Permit and Major Site Plan Approval to allow for the construction and operation of a 99,688 square foot household goods warehousing and storage-mini- warehousing facility in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. LOCATION: North side of Edwards Road, approximately 250 feet west of South 25th Street. ZONING DISTRICT: CG (Commercial, General) FUTURE LAND USE: COM (Commercial) PROPOSED USE: Household goods warehousing and storage-mini- warehousing facility. SURROUNDING ZONING: RS-4 (Residential, Single-Family - 4) to the north and west; CN (Commercial, Neighborhood), CO (Commercial, Office), and CG (Commercial, General) to the east; and CG (Commercial, General) to the south with a preliminary site plan approval for a 318 unit residential development named Frontera-PUD. SURROUNDING LAND USES: Residential to the north and east; vacant residential to the west; vacant commercial property to the south with a preliminary site plan approval for a 318 unit residential development named Frontera-PUD; and a gas station/convenience store to the southeast. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #1 (2400 Rhode Island Avenue), is located approximately 1 mile north. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property will be serviced by the Fort Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA). May 10, 2006 Page 2 Subject: Sabin Companies, Inc. - CU and Major SP Files: CU-05-011/MJSP-05-018 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT -OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way for Edwards Road is 100 feet. The project will be dedicating 20 feet to Edwards Road. The existing right-of-way for South 25th Street is 120 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: None. Certificate of Capacity. ************************************************************* STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for the proposed conditional use, the Board of County Commissioners shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed conditional use is in conflict with any applicable portions of the Sl Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed conditional use has been determined not to be in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The subject property is located in an area with existing commercial uses. Section 3.01.03(S)(7)(g), CG (Commercial, General), allows for household goods warehousing and storage-mini-warehouses as a conditional use, subject to Board of County Commission approval. 2. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would have an adverse impact on nearby properties; The proposed conditional use is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. The applicant proposes a unique building design and landscaping to blend harmoniously with the surrounding neighborhood. The applicant proposes to allow access to the storage-mini-warehouses from 5 a.m. to 12 midnight. Provided that the proposed conditional use, the operation of a household goods warehousing and storage-mini-warehouses, is done in accordance with applicable laws, this activity is not anticipated to have any negative effects upon any adjacent lands or interests. May 10, 2006 Subject: Sabin Companies, Inc. - CU and Major SP Page 3 Files: CU-05-011/MJSP-05-018 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including roads, police protection, solid waste disposal, water, sewer, drainage structures, parks, and mass transit; The Traffic Impact Study states that the existing roadway network will not experience a decrease in Level-of-Service standards below that which is currently experienced due to the construction of this development. The Fort Pierce Utilities Authority has provided a letter confirming the availability of water and wastewater service to the proposed development. 4. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed conditional use is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The subject property is currently vacant with little vegetation. ************************************************************* STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.02.07, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE Section 11.02.07, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code identifies the minimum Standards of Review for all proposed Site Plans. These standards must be met in order for any site plan approvals to be considered. Staff has reviewed the request for Major Site Plan approval, utilizing these requirements and notes the following: A. CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed building or use is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the Sl Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County; and the proposed use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the particular provisions of this Code authorizing such use and any other requirement of the Code and Compiled Laws of Sl Lucie County. The proposed Martin Self Storage - Edwards Road site plan is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County, and the proposed use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the particular provisions of this Code authorizing such use and any other requirement of the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. May 10, 2006 Page 4 Subject: Sabin Companies, Inc. - CU and Major SP Files: CU-05-011/MJSP-05-018 B. EFFECT ON NEARBY PROPERTIES 1. The proposed building or use will not have an undue adverse effect upon nearby property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facirities, and other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. The proposed 99,688 square foot site plan for Martin Self Storage - Edwards Road, has been determined not to have an undue or adverse effect upon nearby properties. The applicant proposes a unique building design and landscaping to blend harmoniously with the surrounding neighborhood. The Traffic Impact Study states that the existing roadway network will not experience a decrease in Level- of-Service standards below that which is currently experienced due to the construction of this development. The Fort Pierce Utilities Authority has provided a letter confirming the availability of water and wastewater service to the proposed development. 2. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed building or use on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping, and screening All reasonable steps have been taken and the proposed project is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. 3. The proposed building or use will be constructed, arranged, and operated so as not to inteñere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. The design of the proposed project has been determined not to interfere with the development or use of neighboring properties. C. ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES The proposed building or use complies with the standards of Chapter V, Adequate Public Facilities. The Fort Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) will provide the proposed project with water and wastewater service. Drainage for the proposed project is provided through a Master Drainage System. D. ADEQUACY OF FIRE PROTECTION The applicant has obtained from the St. Lucie County Bureau of Fire Prevention written confirmation, or has otherwise demonstrated by substantial credible evidence, that water supply, evacuation facilities, and emergency access are satisfactory to provide adequate fire protection. May 10, 2006 Page 5 Subject: Sabin Companies, Inc. - CU and Major SP Files: CU-05-011/MJSP-05-018 The applicant has obtained from the St. Lucie County Fire District written confirmation that the proposed site plan conceptually meets the minimum access and water supply requirements for fire protection services at this facility. E. ADEQUACY OF SCHOOL FACILITIES The proposed building or use will be served by adequate school facilities. As this project is a commercial operation, no school facilities will be impacted by this development. F . ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT For developments required to provide an environmental impact report under Section 11.02.09(A)(5), the proposed development will not contravene any applicable provision of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, or of Chapter VIII, "Natural Environment Analysis", of the St. Lucie County Barrier Island Study Analysis of Growth Management Policy Plan, Kimley-Horn. The project is not required to provide an environmental impact report. The subject property is mostly cleared. The project will be preserving two trees that qualify for protection under the County's resource protection code. The vegetation found on the property does not provide sufficient native resources for resident native wildlife. COMMENTS Sabin Companies, Inc., has applied for a Conditional Use Permit and Major Site Plan approval for a household goods warehousing and storage-mini-warehouses to be known as Martin Self Storage - Edwards Road. Household goods warehousing and storage-mini-warehouses are allowed as a conditional use in the CG Zoning District, subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. The proposed project consists of 98,078 square feet of storage space and 1,610 square feet for a manager's office. The total square footage is 99,688. The proposed project is to be located on the north side of Edwards Road, approximately 250 feet west of South 25th Street. Attached are comments from the City of Fort Pierce concerning this agenda item. At the April 20, 2006, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 with three members absent (Mr. Lounds, Mr. Knapp, and Mr. Trias), recommended approval of the requested conditional use. Planning and Zoning Board member, Ms. Caron, clarified with the applicant that the structure itself created an opaque wall and any spaces between the buildings would have fencing to allow access for emergency use. May 10, 2006 Page 6 Subject: Sabin Companies, Inc. - CU and Major SP Files: CU-05-o11/MJSP-05-018 Staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Sections 11.02.07 and 11.07.03 of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the S1. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 06-058, which, if approved, would grant this request for a Conditional Use Permit and Major Site Plan Approval. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution No. 06-058. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. SUBMITTED: Bob Nix, AICP Growth Management Director ar cc: County Attorney Growth Management Director Public Works Director W. Lee Dobbins File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 RESOLUTION 06-058 FILE NO.: CU·OS·012/MJSP·OS·018 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT AND MAJOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND OPERATION OF A HOUSEHOLD GOODS WAREHOUSING AND STORAGE-MINI-WAREHOUSING IN THE CG (COMMERCIAL, GENERAL) ZONING DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY lOCATED IN ST. lUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: Conditional Use Permit 1. Sabin Companies. Inc., presented a petition for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction and operation of a household goods warehousing and storage-mini- warehousing facility, to be known as Martin Self Storage - Edwards Road, in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for the property described in Part B. 2. On April 20, 2006, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the hereinafter described request for a Conditional Use Permit in CG (Commercial, General) Zoning for the property described below. 3. On May 16, 2006, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 4. The proposed Conditional Use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 5. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. Maior Site Plan 6. Sabin Companies. Inc., has applied for major site plan approval for the project to be known as Martin Self Storage - Edwards Road consisting of 98,078 square feet of File No.: CU-05-011/MJSP-05-018 May 16, 2006 Resolution 06-058 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 storage space and 1,610 square feet for a manager's office for property located in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for the property described in Part B. 7. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet minimum technical requirements of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and to be consistent with the future land use maps from the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 8. The proposed project is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of review of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County. 9. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety and general welfare. 10. All reasonable steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping, and screening. 11. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 12. The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services. 13. The applicant has applied for and received a certificate of capacity, a copy of which is attached to this order as Exhibit A, as required under Chapter V, S1. Lucie County Land Development Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Sections 11.02.08 and 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a Major Site Plan Approval and Conditional Use Permit for Sabin Companies, Inc., to allow the construction and operation of a ,99,688 square foot household goods warehousing and storage-mini-warehousing facility, to be known as Martin Self Storage - Edwards Road, in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District is hereby granted for the property described below, subject to the following conditions: 1. The developer, his successors or assigns, shall limit the hours of construction of the development between 7 a.m. and 5:30 p.m., Monday through Friday and between 7 a.m. and 1 p.m. on Saturday. 2. A condition of approval shall be that prior to the issuance of a SLC Vegetation Removal Permit, a planting plan showing the details of the littoral shelves (where they will be located, what and how many will be planted). File No.: CU-05-011/MJSP-05-018 May 16, 2006 Resolution 06-058 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 3. In accordance with Section 11.07.05(H) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Board of County Commissioners reserves the right to revoke the conditional use permit or modify the hours of operation upon the complaint and proof of adverse effect upon adjacent properties. 4. The Director of Growth Management is authorized to issue a development order in such form as he may prescribe. No development shall occur and the project cannot obtain any permits until a development order is issued by the Director of Growth Management, or the person he designates in writing to issue the development order. The Development Order shall be recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida with the Resolution. 5. The resolution shall be recorded in order to provide constructive legal notice of development conditions that run with the land. The act of recording the resolution does not authorize development. All conditions of approval and applicable code requirements must be determined to be satisfied by the Director of Growth Management. 6. The Director of Growth Management shall obtain comments from the appropriate county staff, legal staff, and other responsible agencies regarding the satisfaction of all applicable code requirements and conditions of approval prior to issuing a development order. 7. The Department of Growth Management shall confer with the County Engineer, Public Works Department, Environmental Resources Department, and Utilities Department to determine the number of constructible engineering plans that shall be required to be submitted for review. The applicant shall, following notification by the Director of Growth Management, submit the required number of plans to the Department of Growth Management for processing, distribution, and final action. 8. No development order shall be issued by the Director of Growth Management until a complete set sealed constructible final engineering plans, supporting calculations and survey data for the site work and offsite improvements are approved by the Office of the County Engineer, Public Works Department, Utilities Department, Environmental Resources Department, Growth Management Department, Fire Department, and any other agency that may be determined by the Director of Growth Management to be necessarily involved in the review and approval of the constructible final engineering plans for the site work and offsite improvements. The determination of whether or not plans submitted by the applicant constitute a complete set of constructible plans shall be made by the departments involved in the plan review within five business days of the date the plans are received in the Department of Growth Management. 9. The Director of Growth Management is authorized to evaluate project concurrency, and to issue a certificate of concurrency upon his determination that all requirements for concurrency management have been satisfied. No File No.: CU-05-011/MJSP-05-018 May 16, 2006 Resolution 06-058 Page 3 1 2 3 4 B. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 C. 31 32 33 34 35 36 D. 37 38 39 40 41 E. 42 43 44 45 F. 46 47 48 G. 49 50 Development Order shall be issued prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Concurrency. The property on which this Major· Site Plan approval and Conditional Use permit is being granted ,is described as follows: THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE EAST 560.0 FEET, AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND LESS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TOGETHER WITH: THE WEST 520.0 FEET OF THE EAST 560.0 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 FEET AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND THAT CERTAIN PARCEL CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, FILED FOR RECORD, OCTOBER 12, 1988 IN O.R.B. 607, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPTING THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBeD IN O.R.B. 1098, PG. 1842, AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS THE WEST 742.98 FEET (8.9 ACRES) THEREOF. (Location: North side of Edwards Road, approximately 250 feet west of South 25th Street. ) The approvals and authorizations granted by this Resolution are for the purpose of obtaining building permits on this property and shall expire on May 16, 2007, unless the developer has obtained a building permit approval for the uses described in Part A above, or an extension has been granted in accordance with Section 11.07.05(F), St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The St. Lucie County Growth Management Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Part A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Growth Management Director. A copy of this Order shall be mailed, return receipt requested to the developer and agent of record as identified on the site plan applications. This Order shall be recorded in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. File No.: CU-05-011/MJSP-05-018 May 16, 2006 Resolution 06-058 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 H. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward XXX Vice-Chairman Chris Craft XXX Commissioner Joseph E. Smith XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 16th Day of May 2006. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS Deputy Clerk County Attorney ar H:\Development Projects 2005\Major Site Plan\Martin Storage - Edwards Road\BOCC\ Sabin CU MJSP RES 06058.doc File No.: CU-05-011/MJSP-05-018 May 16, 2006 Resolution 06-058 Page 5 1 2 3 4 . 5 . 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 EXHIBIT "A" General Location Map Area Subject to the Major Site Plan and Conditional Use Permit Approval File No.: CU-05-011/MJSP-05-018 May 16, 2006 Resolution 06-058 Page 6 C. :J o I.- <.9 o N N o :J Ü C o +-' en :J o I >. 'E ::> o Ü ~ æ c: 1\1 :c .5 () C ~ ~ o I L(') o :::> ü A.. ¡), ~ ';11 t~ ~I .~ t ~ ~ ~~ .l..; ~ \i'i~ CD o o C\ cD ...... z+- ~ . N ~ a(\ Qce pnij ~IIIIS I ] 11N-::I!89"H ] ~ ù ~ Ù HI_ p}:~:] IIN_::> ..., l 5 f ~ ~ c: ::> o Ü c: :e 1\1 :::E ~·U1 ~ ~ ù Æ¡uno~ aaqo4:>aa)0 A petition of Houston Cu !.__oJ Group, Inc. for a Condo dU, .dl Use Permit to allow a household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse facility In the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District Þ.N DR ':> I--< ~ \ [~ L.4,'z. ,... . ¡~; ;~i"!i:i~,~I',¡\: 1~¡¡i~'¡:!~:{~¡¡¡ L- r 1 r-I \ \ CJ) ~ I \ CJ) \ I I 1 I~ IJ: 'r- ,CD IN CJ) >-- ~ VVvv I-- ~Q9Q9 o 15')-01'. 0 0 0ø (-'/I o æ EB 83 ffi EE 83 :B - CJ) 83 æ 8383 tE ~E8 ffi J: ~L CJ) -I f-- ---' I J ,~íTBiNTLY RD :x: ICJ) '-I' ( \ Y r- CJ) J: \;; N CJ) J CJ) _ J: I I ~ WILDWOOD LN_ ?i ~ ü æ <t: :¡: <t: CO" æ V'E:NA.A¡ì ~ cc DR - I b :;c ~ m 0, II \ [ f-- f-- f-- f--- t-- f--- - Z'--- ....J 0'- 0' -0' ~: _WB~COOTHDR- -,,~ \ e---~ 0 C CJ) " ;c - CJ)- - - ~ _ _ 0 f-- J: = = ~I ) EQW~RD_S_f3.D L- _S~RDSRD 111 L~ >--->-~>- ~ ,CJ)-CJ) _'0' 'J: 10' z- ---r- '" N- ,~'C') ,N_ ,N~N CJ) = ø~ø==_ tŒlfŒB 1 II jLlZrrr Ti - I - ~ 1¡!I~~~'¡¡ìlI1, I ~/~ ,;',,:~~jg( 17 L~ " ~ o w o ....J o EDWARDS RD r-- ~ I SIBLEYA -- ~ CU 05-011 W] Subject property f:,:):(;(':';::;::::':'{: City of Ft. Pierce 5è -L~ ó'~~-=- (jr_tli Ma7lO{lemtmt :ZJ9arttrumt N A Map prepared February 16, 2006 Houston Cuozzo Group, Inc. Zoning TIY NOR [i¡ >: UJ ,.. z' ill «:1't'i:;:1 H4·· . FU..··. . . .,.:. :},:::it:!;·¡:::::::¡·¡;··:f:;::ri:::;!; I en; I-- ""'\C'. A :r: ·....1 A I""Ç,~-+ tõ' R~~ N en' I I [:)J A [:)J A ~ ì~ r' 'l~ I en :r: en _ BRANTLY RD ~ I \ ~ r 1 en -I [:)( A . . nt A I ... "T .' ........... .... . ::':::·{.:;/,:;:}i?:::':::.::i::i.:t:~l:, RS 4 ~ :~/?;::'::::":·R·:ti;\:·:;:;::/~?: - ~ i ¡?::.:/:i::~.:i; i.:.~·:,::·(t:)):t::::~;~:::.:. . ~ I " RS-4 ~ en :r: I I ~ en _WILDW.o.OD.LN_ ~ ~ () æ « ::i: ~<::::f ~ rt: ~'?' .. cc ~«) vO I-- ~ en :r: ~ m N en _I PUD ~ ~ l' I RS-4 RS-4 . ~ ¡~.;::::::,<::,:.:/:.}.:~¡:\\.:::.:::j I I I ~ ;M;\~@'ii:i,)[;} I IC~ ,i[}~IJt¡,'~f~ ~ ,;,ft':wE La rt: en a a::: -3 ~ a UJ '0' 1 ~ EDWARDS RD --- CG K::;-~ ~ 1=<1'\J1-~ )\R-1 CU 05-011 ~ Subject property ~. . tiJlj City of Ft. Pierce ~~v~ ~~ 15''''0 ~~ A ~~ '0" ;..;< o ~ E puŒB E8 E8 EE æ en EB EBtErr E ~EB IT EE ::t en -I RM-5 c---' ~JL 3,-- a - 01-- -~- ~ ffi -R )-4 -¡¡;j- ,-- RE-~ co .'" .~ - I-- t---- - - CI~ :- I-- ~ I-- ,-W BQ.OJHDR_ a~ \ rt: I-- en - ::5 ~,. A I--- 0 I..... · _:r: f-- () z I-- L EDWARDS RD ,.....§ EDWARQS.RD ~, ~ r~ - en en, "'~I :r:- a ,-- ~, rt:' ~-~ en'_ en I ¡.ooo.. ~u ~s- - - - ........ A I ,... 'T - - =Ri,-4 I = ~ARBARAAVE r"'Il", A I...... · ELIZABETH AVE R~-# I AS~ I j ~ en a z .- N N_ en ~ f§4- - I RF SIBLE'(~ RM-5 I I 5è .,¿~ a.--7~-= {irfTWtlÏ .Man"",""""t 2J'!Partment Map prepared February 16, 2006 - N A Land Use N'6R ÚJ 5: uJ ,.. ~. J.: J(:i.::::':'{ ;:;::'-::~::;:mr1 R·····RL···.. . .... t.i:::~i:i:::r:::i:·¡:~:f:;:¡::::(:;;·~ #;%~Ê,,[:g f:·:::::f}~~?\,~;·::·::.it~::;::·J~!~:~:.!. ¡;r'}ijcÎ~~!r'~I ¡)i~\j~'\i'~~~~~¡ ~ RU Houston Cuozzo Group, Inc. \ I en; :I: t-, co N en' I I I t- \ I en :I: (j) _ BRANTLY RD ~ 1 \ ~ \ I (j) -I nl ..., ["11 ..., l :;0 o RU 'rií o í , t- en :I: I I ~ en WILDW,O.OD.LN_ ~ ~ ü ~ ~ <I: co" æ V'£:NA.Nr r- CD DR - ["1 ...1 'n. . ~ l' t- en :I: t- O) N en - EDWARDS RD ~ COM KU ~lI '~ P/F CU 05-011 ~ Subject property W(:ii)Y~ City of Ft. Pierce - - ~<ij<O>~ ~ ó'~0~ ~ O..¡;~;.; > (I; ~ E EB R3 EB EB ]] ~ : E8 EE¡f EEE :I: -= ~ ~þC 3- n.IVI _ § I-- f--~I-- >-- ffi - -æ- - RCJ - KU >-- - - - _.....W B]O_O.THDR_ o~ \ ex:: _; en - :S n I _ ~ Tn" -ü - - Z - t-- en r--- 0 .... I ~I R f- I IV N en I-- ~ r--- - f-- I-- - :\':::'<'.:'-:::'::::':':':'¡':':::.:¡::;:::::~ I) I~ ;;@:;·t;W;¡.~itJ l21IRJ ~ .......................... ~ ',:-:::,,:,,:.:::,1fj.f:.:':'.:-: ::.:-:.' ~ ~'¡:'~@~;;NØj~i¡ ( .' ........ :\:.:::·:):\}~201 :i·::::.::.(!I(:~;ji'P?~o ~ L'~ ex:: ~ o uJ Ö ....J o I COM. ~ L EDWARDS RD -ª.. ED"YAR!?S. RD --d¡; !i; ----I :I: - O· t-, ex:: _"":._M _ N, N en _ en - . rïO RU - - - I æ:HARBARAAVE ,"'\. " ELIZABETH AVE I I I - RU 5è ~~ a,~~= {jrtTWtJí Mant:I{1l!mntt Department Map prepared February 16, 2006 j - SIBLEY;~ -- - N A '~>.o. ~~ -.0, ,£:'"':"1!', ~- ,.......... - 1"""r.!II'1i1I ii' ==' ' ~. --:'!': ....,..11·.· 1j' , '. ?:. !~t.~~ .~ .... ì."",' ~- _:" i~i·II~:I:"::..~, -' ..... ,1.:-11: -~!~'. - I I.. '.~. f :;¡ ",~.,{,,~ '..' :,¡!tI~",,, '._1. '~'~.J.t~ , _: ,.' ...0,"" t":.·:!!:"11 t);:: ~4' 8"<0" - I, '~1...~.' .. '~'. .11.- ~-:,.-. ,iIII._.. -¡;,,;¡;,;;¡, ...... L d{ .~I'<', :,II!I';a!I" ~. '~, \ '. f~æ., ; ..,..,~: ", '1r.I" .,.~~.~: .g. ~.~ } I ¡ :JÎ~EI'}jJ11;~·I' ': !;:;~ILI'~ '~21' . ,- ~ :"'i.~:·· · . ' ,.. !II. - . 't";""'. ,. , _~I . I:JIII<.. I ' , "...:!!. \,\. : ''',. > .. . ,~., .... "",,>CO . .. - 1- 't.:, - ï:""""'""....-.~, -""'::;'>&' ~,~,--,' :-'"'1 ~. , ~ ..J ;", -. or\;: . ., "',w, :,.,~ -IE - ~ _.~ \1 ' ~i' ~ . \ " ),:::: , ·T~.... , ¡ :!II 1I!!:!!i!1'" & .;:I~!!"""I'" t".r.;~ ",,' . a'I ~t1 .. ,- ~ ~~:' " . '""'"" -...... . I' IìIì: ....,..!!'!'I.. . r " I, , , '.1''' '1\ . r.'. ~...~. _ .,.;. , ..~ ,. . .-:~,~~. ' I., ~.~ ¡ ~.~:," ..J' . 1. ~ .' ¡. \4f"C' ,g. ;<, .ç.....,. \ 'II!!JJ ..~ "~ I.' - :. . . ~ ¥~j,11 ~ - ,L- ; ¡ I, ., iI¥¡¡¡"'~ i::I. I .- ' .~ ." ¡.... . ¡ ". .' t.~~ I '....: ; I .,~ ..'.'..: IT' [I" ' ~. ~':2:~,::,:;~:"::';;-:~ -~..._-~_.._-"-".......:..... - ,.'~ I a'~~I."'iJ"" r 1.1Iì.'. ~. ~;~~1 :~-;. ~ 1.- ..... ~~ ,"_o,~f_,~; ~f;j:::~~~t~~'~..· ~¡' ~ÏII.,",.~,:;==; (111,'" ~~!lR:. ¡ F~J ' ~.. ~ f . .;::~~~{œ:~:fF " ~.:"~. i \ [j~ }!!!!!S.~~~, §!!!-.:. i\., 1;:ï:I-:iii.;f' [3 . $;l;..~'_' _ _. 't_i~:T_m'" :._ ~~-,L~.!\_-:::.tlll"·_:·~'·;\721tti~l. "11"'A~~ ~ '~I!-~I~.ijl· ~,...-rI":..~~\!.~, ~'~', ,r!aI;: \ 'I:i":,. I = r-r-;""... ....,..--... .l1li:- <---~-_.,,~,..:._- _ . , I . _ I _ I ~{\~,!:7'~"!";'r'; .-'.",' I ....1· .......It.... . _:::--- ....,....;~._.... .........-- ; .,-.. " =: ¡g-i: .~~, -~I~II· ~.iIJ:.-;:~' ~"~ 1"--: ""'2'"~' S 1-1 JWlI . - IJS 1- I ..' II\~~,,·,;;¡II·. IPI.""-~ ~f~"§2~i~! _' ~~__. ....." === ¡. ~ .11.. .."::W _=. JI.":>e..=."~~.~":~ "& '" - 6. ::r==' " .1 ;,;" ;,"" Ifs.,¡¡¡.:,.;;...'&:h~~~ 1:' f,":: I,' "¡¡¡¡¡¡¡."." II!!!J"O: "'==;~.. ~::.:' ~~'.i:!:.:,_-,~',i . . ' ; '! "'," 'j \.. <.., c. . .. '-. .1"'1 ~~,:",,-"::'.- "7'.;:::'~ :,. ,. ~ " . "",>" r. -'f - ""'..,¡ ~ ~P~~1l'~~~~' ~1J J'; 1 ./ .; t)..> ..~, ,-' !!II=. ., iO.' ...."""'''''.."",. I!í .'I'¡ : ..'~_. I. . '. .¡: I :",. .4,.. ,.'..- " v-. ~>;~,,~~ IJ I - ~.!-. "1iIIii;,¡,,; :¡:::_ ',. . A ~ '~~. :'.. ' II ~ 1.;:" ~..'t[!' '!t':'~' ,..'.' , ~...... W .~. ,~ Ý' .. .- I ~...:-=- _ c' '. = ~~ '''''., , ' , ,. n. ~: !!II .-:d "'I " t 1 ~ ,-va_ 418 ~- ~...~ _ ,-' II I IIL-- E¡ . 3):' - :f""I' -. . .. . .. ~I' , ' , ~ß:,.. - . ' . : _ . , 'I ._.. .'¡: .;;;;¡.",¡;t. '!I,... .....'.r I :~ , . ~.'" . " RI' .. ~. .,. ..... ~ .. , 'l III· . Þ;lI - . .'" ',1'. .~. 1:'. . . . !' , L~ ~ "J ~ - ·.~"I'r4!· .¡ ,J·U· ~~, ~'" .'. iii. If; . ..... ". : ". ..... ...-co) .., JI".,Uod\ _,..,.1 " I. .'!". o;~'"~ -. >q .' -:-"":~ II . U ...... ",: : aJ' 111_ a: "'r. ~ .. ':h"?r~ . j" ..... :~,' "., '!o \ '!,I : I: h,\ ~ .. ~. .. ~~ f ·d;.~ ~. ',' Ílr ~- ,. -, . ~'. fi,:,~·f:i:,..~~.i*": :'~i~ ·~II 'ii1~~~~ 1¡¡¡¡¡¡jI·':..;~"",,",,",:~~ ~, ~~..) ,.... 'tift' !L~è~\... ,.....,_.._.~..I!II!..., -. ." 1.. ~..~ .i~; .J'~ iLl' . . 11, .,,1', '''''';,'' LIIIiiii L'YIlfm''''''·: 'I' --!""tIt' III ~,,'~. .-r. ~ .'., .: ~.~. ~r¡i}~ y -"' ;.x,... ... ~t,¡~;-~~,.."~ i It':< . ~: ~f' _~t. '~. .;.0... \¡¡.;,~~'-", : r -.,_ -..!5.i.-. . :;;¡",,;¡' I! ~.l~~.· CU 05-011 ~ Subject property D City of Ft. Pierce 5è ~~ a,~~= {irO'Wni .:MiI7UIQ"",enr 2J9arhrl4nr ~ Map prepared February 16. 2006 CITY OF FORT PIERCE 2005 Florida League of Cities "City of Excellence" Award Winner ZONING ADMINISTRATION DEVELOPMENT REVIEW COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING URBAN DESIGN HISTORIC PRESERVATION CUL TURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING lllMPROVING THE WA Y WE Do BUSINESS" To: FROM: Ri:: DATE: ANDREW RIDDLE, PLANNER PETER BUCHWALD, ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ORCHID PLACE AND MARTIN SELF STORAGE MARCH 16, 2006 Due to workload and a shortage of staff, the City of Fort Pierce Planning Department can only provide the following general comments pertaining to the above-referenced project: Orchid Place · Rezoning: The proposed rezoning of the Orchid Place property from RS-4 to a PUD is inconsistent with the City's vision for the area. If the City were to annex the property at this time, the property would be annexed as R-1, single-family residential, with the density limited to four units per acre. The adjoniing properties located to the west of the Orchid Place property were annexed intot he city as R-1. . · Use: The proposed use of the property for multi-family housing is inconsistent with the City's vision for land use in the area which is single-family residential. · Storm Water Retention: A storm water retention area is located along Edwards Road which does not comply with Section 22-187(9) of the City Code of ordinances. Martin Self Storaae · Zoning: The proposed use of the property for self-storage would require a conditional use permit for the zoning district (C-3) which this property would be zoned in the City. · Use: is inconsistent with the City's vision for land use in the area which is retail-oriented to service the residential development in the area. · Parking: The amount of parking provided does not comply with the City of Fort Pierce parking requirements for storage facilities. In the City's code, this use falls under the category of "manufacturing, wholesale trade and warehouse establishments." This requirement is one parking space for each 600 square feet of gross floor area." (Sec. 22- 60) The City's concern is that there is insufficient parking at one space for each 5,000 100 N. U.S. 1 0 P.O. Box 1480 0 FORT PIERCE, FL 34954-1480 0 772-460-2200 0 FAX 772-466-5808 MARCH 16,2006 PAGE 2 square feet as provided, and that parking spaces should be dispersed throughout the site for vehicular access to storage units. . Surveys and Trees: Property survey, tree survey and tree mitigation data was not provided. . Lighting: A lighting plan showing footcandles for the street, walkways and off-street parking is not provided. P.O. Box 1480 0 FORT PIERCE, FL 34954-1480 0 772-460-2200 (: ({.. ( ( , I, ( S. Section 3.01.03 Zoning Oistrict Use Regulations CG COMMERCIAL. GENERAL 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for a wide varielj of commercial uses intended to serve a population over a large market area, which do not impose undesirable noise, vibration, odor, dust, or offensive effects on the surrounding area, together with such other uses as may be necessary to and compatible with general commercial surroundings. The number in "0" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses e. f. g. h. i. j. k. I. m. n. o. p. q. r. s. 1. u. v. w. x. y. z. aa. bb. cc. dd. , ee. ff. gg. Adopted August 1. 1990 a. b. c. d. AdjustmenVcollection & credit reporting services (732) Advertising (731) Amphitheaters (999) Amusements & recreation services - except stadiums, arenas, race tracks, amusement parks and bingo parlors (79) Apparel & accessory stores (56) Automobile dealers (55) Automotive rental, repairs & servo (except body repairs) (751.753.754) Beauty and barber services (7231724) Building materials, hardware and garden supply (52) Cleaning services 7349) Commercial printing (999) Communications - except towers (48) Computer programming, data processing & other computer servo (737) Contract construction servo (office & interior storage only) (15/16/17) Cultural activities and nature exhibitions (999) Duplicating, mailing, commercial art/photo. & stenog. servo (733) Eating places (581) Educational services - except public schools (82) Engineering, accounting, research, management & related services (87) Equipment rental and leasing services (735) Executive, legislative, and judicial functions (91/92193194/95/96/97) Farm labor and management services (076) Financial, insurance, and real estate (60161/62/63/641&5167) Food stores (54) Funeral and crematory services (726) Gasoline service stations (5541) General merchandise stores (53) Health services (80) Home furniture and furnishings (57) landscape & horticultural services (078) laundry, cleaning and garment services (721) Membership organizations - except for religious organizations as provided in Section 8.02.01 (H) of this code (86) Miscellaneous retail (see SIC Code Major Group 59): (1) Drug stores (591) 118 Revised Through 08l01!OO jj. kk. II. mm. nn. 00. pp. qq. rr. ss. tt. uu. w. ww. XX. Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations ('.' (" hh. (2) Used merchandise stores (593) (3) Sporting goods (5941) (4) Book & stationary (5942/5943) (5) Jewelry (5944) (6) Hobby, toy and games (5945) (7) Camera & photographic supplies (5946) (8) Gifts, novelty and souvenir (5947) (9) Luggage & leather goods (59411) (10) Fabric and mill products (5949) (11) Catalog, mail order and direct selling (5961/5963) (12) Liquified petroleum gas (propane) (59114) ( 13) Florists (5992) (14) Tobacco (5993) (15) News dealers/newsstands (5994) (16) Optical goods (5995) (17) Misc. retail (See SIC Code for specific uses) (5999) Miscellaneous personal services (see SIC Code Major Group 72): (1) Tax return services (7291) (2) Misc. retail (See SIC Code for specific uses) (7299) Miscellaneous business services (see SIC Code Major Group 73): (1) Detective, guard and armored car services (73111) (2) Security system services (7382) (3) News syndicate (73113) (4) Photofinishing laboratories (7384) (5) Business services - misc. (73119) Mobile home dealers (527) Mobile food vendors (eating places, fruits & vegetables-retail) (999) Motion pictures (711) Motor vehicle parking - commercial parking & vehicle storage. (752) Museums, galleries and gardens (114) Personnel supply services (736) Photo finishing services (7384) Photographic services (722) Postal services (43) Recreation facilities (999) Repair services (76) Retail trade-indoor display and sales only, except as provided in Section 7.00.00. (999) Social services: (1) Individual & family social services (1132/839) (2) Child care services (1135) (3) Job training and vocational rehabilitation services (1133) Travel agencies (4724) Veterinary services (074) (' ( ii. 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. Adopted August 1, 1990 ( (( 119 Revised Through 01\101100 (,,'" . ..'. i I' . \: 4. Sf:;cti0n101.03 Zoning Di:>lricl Use Hegulations Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. 6. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00. 7. Conditional Uses a. b. c. d. e. f. g. h. C i. j. ! \ k. k. I. Adult establishments subject to requirements of Sec. 7.10.10. (999) Drinking places (alcoholic beverages) - free-standing. (5813) Disinfecting & pest control services. (7342 Amusement parks. (7996) Go-cart tracks. (7i99) Hotels & motels. (701) Household goods warehousing and storage-mini-warehouses (999) Marina - recreational boats only. (4493) Motor vehicle repair services - body repair. (753) Sporting and recreational camps. (7032) Retail trade: (1) Liquor stores. (592) Stadiums, arenas, and race tracks. (794) Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section ".1ü.;~:! (W.I) 8. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and inc!ucic i¡II. :', ,t\;. a. Drinking places (alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and/or dvic, social, and fraternal organizations). b. One single-family dwelling unit contained within the commercial br '¡'ding, or a detf'lched single-family dwelling or mobile home, (for on-site security PUIlJOSG5). c. Retail trade: (1) Undistilled alcoholic beverages (accessory to retail sale of food). \" I \, Adopted August 1, 1990 120 Revised Through 08101100 c.~,. Mr. Grande stated the commercial proposal for part ofthis that is already commercial makes a lot of sense. Roll Call Mr. Grande - Yes to deny Ms. Caron - Yes Ms. Hammer - No Ms. Morgan - No Mr. Mundt - Yes Chainnan Hearn - No Tie vote - 3 to 3 - Motion fails - Future Land Use Motion to approve by Ms. Caron, was seconded by ? Roll Call Ms. Caron - Yes to approve Mr. Grande - No Ms. Hammer - Yes to approve Ms. Morgan - Yes to approve Mr. Mundt - No Chainnan Hearn - Yes to approve 4 to approve - 2 to deny -approved for land use amendment. Per Ch Innan Hean application will be forwarded to the Board of Commission with a recommendation of approval. A enda Item #3: Sab' Andrew Riddle, PI e from RS-4 Residential Single Family- 4 duJac Zoning District to PUD -Planned t - Orchid Place Zoning District. The ~roperty is 8.9 acres located North side of E ately 650 ft West of South 2St Street. Existing zoning is residential, single fam welling Its per acre. The surrounding zoning is residential. sin Ie famil 4 dwellin units er d UD Planned Unit Develo ment Lake Forrest Parks to the North. Commercial General to the and South and the Cit ofFt. Pierce to the West. The applicant proposes an 80 multi-f: y dwelling unit and 10- 8 unit buildings. The proposed plan is maintaining 4.26 acres. The proposed RM (residential medium) Future Land Use will allow up to 9 dwelling units per acre. Staff recommends that this petition be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval with a condition. Chainnan Hearn will'open the public hearing. See no-one, the public hearing is closed. Ken Natoli stated open space contains 2.62 acres includes the small grass area around the back, all green space, pool, community area and other open spaces all around the project. Chainnan Hearn stated 7 AM is the starting time of construction. Ms. Caron stated working hours of construction are 7 AM to 5 :30PM, Monday through Friday and on Saturday, 7 AM to 1PM. Charlie Sabin stated those working hours for construction are fine. Ms. Hammer had a concern of one way in and one way out. A condition of this commission's approval has to have another exit entrance. Mr. Nix stated staff will have the fire department review it and make comments and send it to the Board of County Commissioners. Ms. Caron commented regarding the price range of housing for the work force. 8 Charlie Sabin stated this proj ect they were in the $140K price range. Since then construction costs increased in the last 2.5 years. Hoping to keep price in the mid $200K. This is a concrete block building, not stick built, it is poured concrete. Mr. Sabin sticks to quality and hopes to keep the price down. Try to keep the price at that level. Attorney Dobbins stated it is currently zoned 4 units however it just received final P & Z approval for a density of 5.5 on the property to the west. Ms. Hammer made a motion to recommend to grant approval to the application of Sabin Companies, Inc. for a change in zoning from the RS-4 residential single family 4 zoning to the PUD, Planned Unit Development - Orchid Place zoning district because it could be a transition project with conditions from the staff and also with the condition that another exit/entrance is added to the plan and the working hours be adjusted to Monday-Friday, 7AM to 5:30PM and Saturday, 7 AM to IPM. Seconded by Ms. Morgan. Mr. Grande stated he will not be able to support the motion because a project of this type is inconsistent with the neighborhood. Roll Call Ms. Hammer - Yes to approve Ms. Morgan - Yes Ms. Caron - Yes Mr. Grande - No Mr. Mundt - No Chainnan Hearn - Yes 4 - 2 to approve Chainnan Hearn opened the public . ,s Inc. abin Companies, Inc. for a Conditional Use Pennit to allow household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehousing trict. The property has 4.9 acres and is located on the North West of South 25th Street. Staff recommends that this Issioners with a recommendation of approval. A enda Item #4: Sabin Com Andrew Riddle, Planner for the construction in the Commercial side of Edwards Road app petition be forwarded to the eeing no-one, the public hearing is closed. Ms. Caron stated regarding the opaque nee is the wall of the actual unit(s). Charlie Sabin stated there are openings between the buildings and they may be some fencing between these openings. Mr. Dobbins stated there are no roadway contributions since the project will not be impacting the traffic. The level of service does not change. Mr. Grande made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that approval be granted for the application of Sabin Companies, Inc. for Conditional Use Permit to allow for the construction and operation of a household goods warehousing and storage mini warehouse in the SG Commercial General Zoning district because it is consistent with the surrounding community and will help to offset the strain on the infrastructure caused by Orchid Place. This motion has been seconded by Mr. Mundt. Roll Call Mr. Grande - Yes to approve Mr. Munde - Yes 9 Ms. Hammer - Yes to the motion except for the part about the strain on the community. Ms. Morgan - Yes Ms. Caron - Yes Chairman Hearn - Yes Unanimously approved for the conditional use permit. Agenda Item #6: Michael Bryant Linda Pendarvis, Planner, is a petition of Michael Bryant's request for a Change in Zoning from RS-2 Zoning District to the AG-1 Zoning District for property located on the West side of Bennet Road, 1950 ft South of Peterson Road to allow for the grazing of his personal horses. Michael Bryant resides at 6391 Peterson Road, located approximately 1000 ft North from the subject property. Existing uses to the North and South are large residential lots and to the East is Odems Orchid Plant Nursery. The subject property is located in which is currently utilized for residential and some limited agricultural uses. Several p in the area have been rezoned to the AG-1 zoning district recently. All these re-zonin e previously been determined to' be consistent with the existing development patterns a, the e not entirely consistent with the comprehensive plan designation for the future ofth ot consistent with the approved and proposed residential project in the area. Sta ible - RS-2 residential single family 2 dwelling units per acre zoning . trict is the most ap . ate zoning district designation for the subject property. The residential d ent pattern in a may be conflicting with the permitted rights ofthe AG-1 one dwelling e zoning dis alternative zoning of AR-1 which is agricultural residential one d acre wo llowas an accepted use animals other than domestic pets which may b e not housed within 100 feet of any property line. The subject property is vacan oning to AR-1 is approved accepted use would be allowed after residential pitted use as placed on the property. Staff has reviewed the petition and determined that it does n conform to the standard of review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code an . . conflict with the goals, objectives and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive PI taffbelieves that the approved and proposed developments' ea and the specific conditions of the subject do not create a suitable environm dwelling unit per acre zoning district. Staff recommends that this board forwar denial for the AG-1 zoning district with the consideration of AR-1 Ag¡-! elling unit per acre zoning district. Mr. Grande tive proposal is AR-l. The applicant is requesting to board some horses. It is ne esidence on the property in order to have an accessory use. It appears that there resid e on this property now and since the applicant lives nearby, he will not be residing on th y in a house. The applicant cannot have an accessory use if the applicant does not hav ouse to be an accessory to. Linda Pendarvis stated that AR-1 does allow horses as accessory to permitted use but there has to be a residence in order to have horses on the property. Mr. Grande stated since there is no residence and the applicant does not plan to put a residence on the property, his desire to put two horses on this property would not be met, if the staffs recommendation is followed. Linda Pendarvis stated that the applicant does not own the property. He would lease the property and board his horses. Michael Bryant, applicant, stated he was interested in "storing" his horses for convenience on this property which is behind Odom's Nursery which is AG-1. Storing horses would keep some 10 - q II) 'i' ::J U cD CI ns o ... èñcø :=0 CDO enN I: . ._ cø 1::- ~~ ã.2 ~.c o CD "'11.. C).: o CD ~ .!ll o ~ ~a. Ua. 1:« .s~ ~ ~ ~e ...a. .S!E g',g ~'tI .- CD õ'i Q. ~ «0 ~ a; a; ooq- ...... 0 oq- ;btb oq- v...... 0 LON ...... oq- tb 0)0) 00 V ...... CD CD 0) V N('t' V CD 0)0) 0)0) 0) 0) ...... ...... ...... ...... ......('t' 0) 00 CD V ...... ...... ~~ voq- V "'f "'f 1919 19 ~~ "'f ('t' LO 19 CD 19 ('t'('t' ('t' I , , ...... ('t' 00 NN N ('t'N LO...... a;tõ ...... ...... NN NN NN N...... 0)1'- 0) 0) 0)1'- 0 0 00 CD V 00 00 00 0000 1'-00 OOLO 00 00 0000 0000 0000 00) ...... ...... ......CD V V 0)0) 0) 0)0) 0) 0)0) vO) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0)0) 0) 0) 00 ('t'('t' ('t'oq- 0 0 vN V oq-oq- ~ ~~ ('t'v ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~~ vv ('t'('t' ('t' ('t' ('t' ('t' 0 0 ('t' ('t' ('t' ('t'('t' ('t' ('t' ('t'('t' ('t'('t' ('t' ('t' ('t' ('t' ('t' ('t' ~ B ...J...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J...J ...J ...J ...J...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J...J ...J ....I ....I...J ...J...J ...J ....I ....1....1 é3 <....I ....I ....I...J ...J en 11..11.. II.. 11..11.. II.. u..LL LL LL LLLL LL LL LL LL LLLL LL LL LLLL LLLL LLLL LLLL C)LL LL LLLL LL ~ CD Q Q Q ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ .c 'tI I!! "E"E 'E .c ~ () ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c: ~ ~ 8 ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CD U Q Q Q š~ ~ ~ 8 ns ::I ¡¡¡ 'tI"O 'tI CI ~~ Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 0 Q Q à> Q à> Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q 'S ::I ::I ::I c: Q Q à> ce en 'tI ns ns ns ~ 'E 'E U ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä: ä:ä: c: c: ....I ....I ...J ä: ä: t:: ä: 1: 0 Q .!!! 8 ~ E E E ns t:: ~ t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: .c t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t::t:: ¡¡¡ t::t:: t:: t:: t:: ¡¡¡ ::I t:: Õ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 ns ::I ::I 0 0 èñ 0 LL LL LL LL LL LL LL J: LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LL LLLL J: U LLLL LL ....IU U LL LL a. LL V "0"0 ~ N ~~ ('t' cece ce i .2! ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ è!; è!; ...... c: := c: en .~ .~ '!;! a. .2! c: ...J ~ ....I I i i ....I ~ c: c: c: c: ~ èñ èñ èñ c: c: c: c: c: Q Q Q "0 .2! en ~ "0 Q ....I ...J ....I Q ....I Q Q ....I ....I ...J ....I ...J E E E I ~ a:: a:: ns £ Q I!! ... "0 C I!! .c .c .c "0 ~ 0 E E E ~ ~ I!! "0 "0 "0 iñ iñ iñ a:: "0 "0 '8 "0 '8 èñ ~ Q <II <II UC 0 0 0 cf. 0 U 0 0 0 LO 0 0 0 :> J: c: c: U V 0 ~ 0 0 aï N N N <II ns èñ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 Q 00 U U U ~ ~ 0 Q c: ...... ~ ~ èñ ~ Q 0 ë: ~ .c "0 0 ~ ns ns 0 "0 Q o ro ...... ('t' 0 .c .c .c <II iñ I'- - - ûí ë ë c: c: U ~ 0 c: 8 V Q Q Q ¡¡j Q N c: 'S 'S 'S <II 'ê V Q Q CD CD CD CD 0) <II <II ns ns CD Q ~ c: III ns .c .c .c .c ro 0 0 0 ::I N .c .c .c .c .c N LL ~ Q CD 0 ~ ~ ., ., 0 ro III U 0 x en en en ns en x U en en en a:: :> en en en en en en en z x ~ ~ U en en en Õ U e 0 0 0 LO 0 ce ('t' I'- ...... W I'- ce LO 0 0 0 ~ 0 I'- ...... II) ...... 0) 0) LO 0 ce 00 00 00 ...... 0 0 ...... ...... 0 U LO 'tI 0 0 0 ...... ...... N LO N 0 0 00 00 00 0 0 ('t' ...... ...... ...... N 0) 0 00 00 00 M LO LO N N 0 LO 0 'tI ('t' 00 0) 0) 0) 0 0) ('t' 0) 0) 0) 0) ('t' ...... 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 I'- I'- I'- V oq- I'- I'- LO ('t' ('t' « N N a. N N N LO N a. N N N N 00 N ('t' N N N N N N ...... a. V V V 0) N N N N ('t' I'- N CD E ns I: II.. N ...J :E ... U ... Q .!!! ~ CD ~ I: ~ 0 c: <II c: Ô 0 CD 0 c a:: J: CD E ns I: ...J ~ ro <II à> Q ro I: c: .5 E c: ~ >- ro ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ ro 0 ., J: en a. CD E ns I: C :E c: II.. .c « LL 8 ....I 0 - ãí <II ro ...J 0 ª II) ... ro en en .~ c: ~ Q CD ë .c E ~ ï: ~ I!! c: ::I- I: 1\1 .~ '§1 "0 'E ff~ ~ ... .!::! 0 "0 à> c: ro .c 1\1 0 1\1 0 ro 1\1 0 U ¡¡j I- :E :> 0 z a:: I- en c .,J: ., UU ...J....I ~ a. ...J ....I .c U ~ U E E f!! ....I ...J () CD c: ...J ....I ...J U E E .= ä: t:: U ro ro ro ...J 0 0 oLL a. ...J U c: c: c: ...J U U å. ~ 0 ...J 0 0 0 <II ë ë () ::I ~ f!! f!! f!! .= ....I "0 "0 ã! .= ~ ~ .=õ ~ ....I Q CD CI CD CD Q CD CD ãi ~ en en en c: E E ui C) ~~ c: c: c: E '6 CD CD g t:: t:: t:: ~ I~ ::I CD ~ ~ ~ õ .~ .~ CD 0 a. E CD () ro ro ro CD ä: 1\1 ï: ~ ~ 0.8 ... ro CD 'E 'E 'E J: ãí ãí a. a. a. a. ...J ë t:: a:: ro 0 a. 1\1 ~ c: ::I a:: a:: a. I: <II èñ èñ èñ ~ 0 ãí 0 1\1 ro ro .c C C ::I <II ...J a. ro 'E U Q II.. ~ ~ ~ i- () Q CD :E :E E U 'E J: LO LO II) 1\1 <II ro E a. 1\1 c: c: 0 ..... 'Ëce c: g. ro a. CD N 1\1 Q C C C CD ~ ~ U c: ~ N N N rJ c: <¡: ro 13 ce .s .s .s ... <II 0 1\1 ~ 'u :ë 0 ... ä: Q <II I!! .c .c .c 1! ro ïii CD CD CD c: 1\1 ~ c: :e <II c: "0 ::I "0 .2! c: E $ $ <II "0 I: ~ .- c: 0 .~ c: w 'S 'S 'S ...J .5 := .c c: c: c: J!! t:: E E E ~ ~ ...J ....I :ë ::I W ~ ::I Õ .c ~ 0 J!! 1\1 0 0 ::I ¡¡¡ ro .2! CD Q rJ ro 0 0 0 ¡¡¡ en en ro 0 "0 1\1 0 èñ 0 ro èñ ro <II 0 èñ 0 W ...J U ., ., :E en ...J J: en en en ...J en ä: en :E ã5 ...J :E w II.. J: J: J: a. Z Z en J: V 0) ('t' 00 N CD 0 0 ('t' II) ('t' I'- V 0 00 V V II) ..... 0) I'- N è!; 00 ...... 00 LO è!; ..... 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ('t' ('t' II) I'- 0) 0 00 II) N è!; II) ('t' N 0 N V N CD ...... CD ..... ...... ...... N ('t' 0) 0 ...... 0 0 0 N N N N ('t' N 0 0 0 0 0 0 ('t' N N N ('t' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ë ('t' ('t' ('t' 0 0 ...... 0 0 ..... ~ I'- I'- I'- I'- N ('t' ...... ..... ..... ..... ...... V """ ('t' ...... ...... ..... ('t' N ..... 0 0 ãi ~ ('t' ('t' 0 0 0 0 0 0 V 0 0 0 0 0 0 V ~ 0 ...... ...... ..... 0 oq- v 0 0 f ... ('t' ('t' I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- è!; I'- I'- I'- I'- è!; (0 I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- è!; CD aï aï ...... CD è!; ~ 0 0 - CD !:! 0 N N N N ...... ...... ...... ...... N ..... ... ...... 00 ...... ...... N N N 00 0) 00 0 0 º c: c: N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 0 Q ~ 1\1 v v """ v v v v v v v """ v oq- v v v v v v v v v v oq- v oq- """ v """ """ 0 0 .ï Jio Q. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N ...... ...... Treasure Coast Newspapers ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA , MAY 16, 2006 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Sec- tion 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie Coun~ Land Devel- opment COde and in accordance with the provi- sions of the St.' Lucie County Comprehensive Plan that the following applicants have request- ed that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners considers their fOllowing re- quests: 1. MICHAEL BRYANT for a Chanøe in Zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 ¡jU/ac) Zoning District to the A. G -1 (Agricultural - 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the fo!lowing de- scribed property: 13 3539 THAT PART OF S 1/2 OF SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LYG ELY OF E R/W 1-95-LESS S 42.5 FT- (5.75' AC) (OR 692-2732). Location: West side of Bennet Roadil' approxi· mately 1,950 feet south of Peterson Roa . 2. HALF HOUR' CUSTOM AUDIO AND ACCESSORIES for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the opera' tion of a' Motor Vehicle Repair Service· Body Repair in the CG(Commerclal, General) Zoning District for the following described property: ',. LEXINGTON SQUARE LOTS 13 AND 14 (1.34 ÀC) (OR 2051-182). - .' - Location:' 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida. 3. SABIN COMPANIES, INC. for, a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a household goods warehousing and storage mini-ware- house facility in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for the following descrl,bed property· ...,' ,'," , , - THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH" RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPTING THE EAST 560.0 FEET, AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR CANAL RIGHT OF WAY AND LESS THE RIGHT-OF·WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TOGETHER WITH: " THE WEST 520.0 FEET OF THE EAST ,560.0 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE' SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH. RANGE 40 EAST. ST. LUCIE COUNTY'i FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 I'EET AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND THAT CERTAIN PAR- CEL CONVEYED TO THE, BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI- DA, FILED FOR RECORD, OCTOBER 12, 1988 IN O.R.B. 607, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LU- CIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT- , ING THAT CERTAIN, PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN O.R.B. 1098, PAGE 1842, AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORI- DA., LESS TJ:tE WEST 742,9B FEET (8.9 ACRES) ,THEREOF." " " , Location: North side of Edwards Road, approxi- mately 250 feet west of South 25th Street. , 4. SABIN COMPANIES, INC for a Change In, Zoning from the RS . 4 (Residential, Single-Family - '" du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (plann!!d Unit Development - Orchid Place) Zoning DIs- trict and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the following described prop- Tl'f~EST 742.98 FEET (8.9 ACRES) OF THE FOL- LOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: THE SOUTH 1/2 f¿F THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 vF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EX- CEPTINGTHE EAST 560.0 FEET, AND THE NORTH , 96 FEET FOR CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND LESS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TO- GETHER WITH: ", THE WEST 520.0 FEET OF THE EAST 560.0 FEET OF THE SOUTH 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 , OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 FEET AND THE' NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WAY AND THE CERTAIN PAR- CEL CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI- DA, fiLED fOR RECORD, OCTOBER 12, 1988 IN O. R. B. 607, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LU- CIE COUNTY, fLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT- ING THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN O.R.B. 1098, PAGE 1842, AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC ,.RECORDS OF ST., LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI- Lo~~tlon:North side of Edwards Road,approxi' mately 650 feet west of South 25th Street. Tuesday, May 2,2006 S. TAILERS' COVE DEVELOPMENT, LLC for a Change in Zoning from the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Tailers' Cove) Zon- Ing District, and Preliminary and final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the follow- Ing described property: THE NORTH 400 fEET Of PARCEL G. F.E. ENGLER'S PLAT OF SURVEY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, AT PAGE 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING WEST Of STATE ROADA+A. ,.. " Location: West side of South SR A+A. directly across from Atlantis I Condominiúms 16. CHARLES AND PEGGY WARD for a Change in Zoning from the RS ·2 (Residential, Single-fami- ly ·2 dU/ac) Zoning District to the AR - 1 (A!ilr· icultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning D,I,strlct for the following described property: 13 35S 39E 13 35 39 N 1/2 Of N 1/2 Of S 1/2 Of NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 ·LESS W 2 AC OF SD N 1/2 OF S 1/2 Of NE 1/4 Of NE 1/4 AND LESS E 550.01 FT· (1.92 AC) (OR 1000-81: 1005-2109: 1204-1397) 13 35S 39E 13 35 39 W 510.01 FT OF E 55O.01FT Of N 1/2 Of N 1/2 Of 5 1/2 OF NE 1/4 Of NE 1/4 (1.93 AC) (OR S28-1343, 1344: 1017-2312: 1204-1398) Location: ,i245 South Jenkins Road, fort Pierce, Florida. . " . , . 7. JOHN WARD for a Change In Zoning from the RS -2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 dU/ac) Zon- ing District to the AR - 1 (Agricultural, Residen- tial - 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the following described øroperty: ' THE PARCEL CONTAINED WITHIN: THE SOUTH, 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 Of TRE NORTHEAST 1/4 Of THE NORTHEAST 1/4 Of SECTiON 13, TOWNSHIP 3S SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, fLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREfROM, THE WEST 2 ACRES Of THE SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 Of THE NORTHEAST 1/4 Of SEC- TION 13, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ALSO LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM,ROAD RIGHT-Of·WAY. ' Location: 127S South, Jenkins Road, fort Pierce, florida. The PUBLIC' HEARING on this item will be held In the Commission Chambers. Roger Poitras An- nex. 3rdfloor, St. Lucie County Administration Building. 2300 Virginia Avenue, fort Pierce, Fiori- " da on May' 16, 2006, beginning at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. Action can be tak- en at this meeting, or the item can be continued to a future date and time. ' All Interested persons will be given an opportunl-, ,ty to be heard. Written comments received In advance of the public hearing will also be con- sidered. Written comments to the Board of County Commissioners should be received by the Growth Management Department -- Planning Division' at least 3 days prior to the, scheduled hearing. 'The petition file is available for review at the Growth Management Department offices located at 2300 Virplnia Avenue, Fort Pierce. Florida. ,Please cal '772/462-2822 If you have any guestions or require additional, infornlatlon. The file for this project may be Inspected prior to the hearing date In the Growth Management Department, 2300 Virginia Avenue, 2~d Floor, , fort Pierce florlda. , ' ' ' The St. Ludecounty Board of County Commis- sioners has the power to review and grant any applications within their area of responsibility. The proceedings of the Board of County Commis- sioners are electronically recorded. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105. Florida Statutes, If a, person decides to appeal any decision made by the , Board, of County COmmissioners with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a 'record ,of the proceedings. for such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of, the proceedings Is made, which record includes the testimony and evi- , dence upon which the appeal Is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceed- Ing, Individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opøortunity to cross-examine any Individual testifying during a hearing upon request.·, If It becomes necessary, a public hear- Ing may be continued from time to tIme as may be necessary to a date-certain.. -' _ AnYOne. with a disability re, qulrlng accommoda- tion to attend this meetlnQ. should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least, forty-eight (48) hours' prior to the meet· ing at 772/46'1.-1777 or T.D.D. 772/462-1428. ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA IS/DOUG COWARD, CHAIRMAN , PUBLISH DATE: May 2, 2006 Publish: May 2, 2006 1384761 ST. lUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: To allow the operation of a household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse facility. North side of Edwards Road. approximately 250 feet west of South 25th Street. CG (Commercial. General) Zoning District Received 8y' Please Return To; St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - A TTN: Deanna 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Growth Management Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 10. 20ª ~/' I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE ~ I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I certify that. as of the date shown below. I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): A ~ MAD '-~ I-tléJ-(. ,A(){;-r-t, Çór -I !3fYù- ¡fj. /1 Ü c ¡Jo . ~ú~ 1Jú ð Su Coc\)~~ Cr~..f(,ÇC S ó 7J Address: Date: -s " S- ~ 0 to Signed: QD k--- Please note that any form retumed without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. Sabin Companies, Inc. - CU - 05-011. ·-ICS::JI ....""T UU .J.'-JI. .&.'-JICI . . - -.... .. --- .- .. - ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4I5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: Cu"ently Zoned: To allow the operation of a household goods warehousing and storage mini-warehouse facility. North side of Edwards Road, approximately 250 feet west of South 25111 Street. CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Deanna 2300 Virginia Avenue. Ft. Pierce. FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: May 10. 2006. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDmONAL USE >( I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (PIea,e PrInt): 1 C; ,r'\ ~rk'Ñ.s NORTH ST. LUCIE RIVER WATER CONTROL D!c;T'\ICT 2.12 I S. .Jt':N~INS RD. FT. PIERCE. FI ~IIQa1 Address: .... -),: i, ~ - / ". 7 ," , .' : ( ¡'" Date: .r..;-:" Cí L '....J./ Signed: ~(~/), . ..:::.. ~~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be cO~jdered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request Comments: FILE NO. Sabin Companies, Inc. - CU - 05-011. -*- ..- --.---.- .._~- .- .- , Martin Self Storage Ft. Pierce, FL Environmental Impact Report Prepared For: St Lucie County Environmental Resource Department ' Prepared By: Crossroads Environmental Consultants, Inc. 1251 SW 27th Street; Suite 2 Palm City, Florida 34990 772-223-5200 ©Crossroads Environmental Consultants, Inc. July 2005 8,,' ; ,¡ '¥- jl n f,} '1/ Înnr.~ ~,,~ ~i<" _ Ii".,·.... ;].;11'_1' Grovvt¡'¡ The following environmental impact report has been prepared in accordance with Section 11.02.09(A) (5) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The environmental impact report is required when the thresholds depicted in Section 11.02.09(A) (5) (a) are met. The property is located within Section 20, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. The property is further identified by St. Lucie County property identification number 2420-444-0005-000-5. This parcel is located on the northwest comer of 25th Street South and Edwards Road, east of Interstate 95, and west of Federal Highway U.S. 1. The overall site acreage of the Martin Self Storage parcel is ± 4.92 acres. Based on section 11.02.09(A) (5) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the environmental impact report shall completely depict the following: 1. A vegetation and substrate survey including: a) Extent and acreage of any areas in which vegetation typical of the primary dune extends landward of the Coastal Construction Control Line; There are no areas of primary dune on this parcel. b) Extent and acreage of all marsh and mangrove forest areas, including substrate conditions; There are no marsh or mangrove areas on the property. c) Extent and acreage of all upland hammock forests; and, No native upland areas exist on the property. The entire parcel has been disturbed. However, there are protected trees (as defined by the County's DBH standard) on the parcel (see below). Please refer to tree survey, submitted under separate cover by Houston Cuozzo Group, for locations of County protected trees. Identified uplands carry the following FLUCCS classification: # 740: Disturbed Lands (4.92 acres) The vegetation observed on the parcel includes: Slash pine, Pinus elliiottii Brazilian pepper, Schinus terebinthifolius Laurel oak, Quercus laurifolia Live oak, Quercus virginiana Dog fennel, Eupatorium spp. Cabbage palm, Sabal palmetto Swamp fern, Blechnum serrulatum d) Extent and acreage of all wetlands. An environmental assessment conducted by Crossroads Environmental Consultants, Inc. and their staff of qualified biologists indicates that there are no wetland areas on the property. A site visit was conducted on May 18,2005 with Robin Burgess from the SFWMD. No wetlands were determined to exist on the property. A confirmation letter from the SFWMD is included. The vegetation in these areas consisted almost entirely of a variety of non- descript grasses. 2. A statement of jurisdictional control over the environmental area. The applicant will be submitting environmental impact applications to the St. Lucie County ERD and South Florida Water Management District. The applications include an environmental resource permit, and a drainage system permit. St. Lucie County will retain jurisdictional control over the protected trees on the site. 3. A statement on when the jurisdictional boundaries were delineated and who delineated the boundaries. No jurisdictional boundaries have been delineated at this time. Preliminary site visits allowed for the composition of a FLUCCS Map and an assessment of resident wildlife populations. Transects have been completed throughout the entire parcel. A site visit on May 18, 2005 with the SFWMD confirmed the absence of wetlands on the property. The confirmation letter is included. 4. Indicate the required first floor elevation, and whether all floor elevations will be above this level. Frida Engineering will submit this information under separate cover. 5. The identification of any area that has experienced overwash of the primary dune. Overwash areas are not applicable to this property. 6. The identification of any area subject to breach during storm conditions. Based on the location of the property there is no evidence of storm wash (former breaches) on the property. Further breaches are not expected to occur. 7. An assessment of the impacts upon onsite vegetation and wildlife. Limited trees required to be protected on the property will be impacted by commercial construction. All Oaks over twenty-four (24)" Diameter Breast Height (DBH) will be preserved in place. Two Oaks fall into this category and are located in the northern section of the parcel. Please refer to Question 11 for the tree mitigation/impact scenario. Exotic vegetation will be removed from the site. Cattle Egrets (Bubulcus ibis) were observed during the site visits. The property is mostly cleared and situated adjacent to a major intersection. Very little habitat exists for wildlife on the parcel. Based on this, the impacts to native wildlife will be minimal. 8. An assessment of the impacts upon onsite and off-site natural resources. The overall onsite impacts will include the limited removal of Live and Laurel oaks, Slash pine, and Cabbage palms on the site. Not all trees being removed qualify for protection under the current tree ordinance. The off-site natural resources affected by the proposed activity are minimal. The immediate area around the property has historically been agricultural with commercial property to the north and east of the proposed development. Potential improvements to roadways and traffic intersections will have an extremely limited impact on off-site natural resources. The applicant will create landscape buffers on all sides of the property with the exception of the proposed entrance point, as part of the plan to buffer the property from adjacent future commercial and residential uses. The landscape buffers on the site plan will incorporate preserved and replacement trees. Additionally, some smaller Oaks, not qualifying for preservation under the current tree ordinance, will be transplanted into the landscape buffer, where feasible. The applicant has proposed to remove and/or kill in place all exotic vegetation remaining on the site. 9. A detailed description of the planned approach to minimize impacts. The applicant has minimized overall impacts with the proposed program of revegetation within the landscape areas, relocation of all Cabbage palms greater than ten (10) foot Clear Trunk (CT), into these areas, preservation in place of all Oaks over twenty four (24)" DBH, and removal of exotics. Impacts to natural resources include the removal of Live and Laurel oaks, Cabbage palms, and Slash pines. Of these trees being removed, only one (1) Oak and two (2) Slash pines qualify for protection. The applicant has attempted to minimize the impacts to Laurel oaks, Live oaks, Slash pines, and Cabbage palms, through preservation and relocation as noted on the attached plan in Question 11. 10. A detailed description of the proposed alterations or disturbances being proposed. The applicant proposes to construct a commercial structure with associated water management system. To accomplish this, the applicant has proposed impacts to Laurel oaks, Live oaks, Slash pines and Cabbage palm trees on the property. As already stated, not all trees being removed qualify for protection under the County's tree ordinance. Additionally, all Cabbage palms greater than the (l0)' C.T. with be relocated on site to the landscape buffers. The applicant also proposes to remove exotic vegetation on the property. Prior to construction, the applicant will flag and barricade all trees within the clearing area proposed for preservation. The applicant will also flag and barricade the trees proposed for relocation. The barricade (consisting of orange "snow fence" or a similar material) will be located at the perimeter drip line (at a minimum). The relocation trees will then be root pruned under the supervision of a certified arborist in preparation for relocation. The reception areas will then be prepped for transplant, including removal of exotic plant material. During tree relocation, the applicant will also transplant native understory materials on the site, where available, in order to minimize overall impacts to resources. 11. A detailed description of the proposed mitigation plan to off set impacts. The landscape buffer areas will utilize native vegetation and will be maintained by the land owner in perpetuity. Nine (9) Cabbage palms will be transplanted to the landscape buffers. Additionally, all Oaks over twenty-four (24)" DBH will be preserved on site. Two Oaks in the northern section fall into this category. Some smaller Oaks not qualifying for preservation will also be translocated into the landscape buffer, where feasible. Tree survey information describes limited areas that currently support seventy seven (77)" of Oak, twenty-eight (28)" of Slash pine, and nine (9) Cabbage palms with a clear trunk greater than ten (10) feet. Nine (9) Cabbage palms will be relocated to the landscape buffers. The twenty-seven (27)" DBH and thirty-eight (38)" DBH Oaks will be preserved in place. Overall, the current site plan allows for the preservation, in place, of sixty-five (65)"of Oak. Nine (9) Cabbage palms will be translocated, on site, and used within the landscape design of the development. Total impacts consist of the removal of twelve (12)" of Oak and twenty-eight (28)" of Pine, requiring eighty (80)" of mitigation. Preservation of sixty five (65)" of Oak will give one hundred thirty (130)" of credit. Therefore, no further mitigation will be required. The preservation of sixty-five (65)" of Oak as well as the relocation of all Palms qualifying for preservation fulfills all mitigation requirements. As part of the overall mitigation plan and in accordance with the County's regulations and with written notice from the County, the applicant or the POA shall, eighteen (18) months after the issued certificate of occupancy, voluntarily submit to an inspection of the planted/preserved materials. In the event that the inspection finds the preserved area to be out of compliance, the property owner will correct the deficiency within sixty (60) days of receiving written notice from the County. 12. A plant and animal survey for onsite federal and state protected species. A preliminary plant and animal survey was conducted by Crossroads Environmental Consultants, Inc. during March of 2005 and again in May of2005. No resident listed animal species were observed on the property. No listed plants were observed on the property. 13. A surface water management plan and written assessment including a description of techniques to be used to prevent both the potential degradation of surface water resources and an increase in flood hazard damage. This information will be completed by Fricia Engineering and submitted under separate cover. 14. A sea turtle protection plan. A sea turtle plan is not applicable for this property. 15. A shoreline stabilization plan. A shoreline stabilization plan is not applicable for this property. 16. A gopher turtle protection plan. Crossroads Environmental Consultants, Inc. has completed a transect analysis of the entire site. Based on the site surveys on the property there are no gopher tortoises on the property. ~ ..... ~ i I i ~[;[Ë] ~ ¡~ . 6);¡;;¡; !~ mm mm ;0 ;0 ;0 ¡¡¡ en.- ~ m ~ I ." ~ ~ ~~ 0 en ':! m C m ¡¡¡ ~ ;0 i ~ ~! ~ ~ '" I J: ¡¡1 ~ e¡ ~ CJ CJ m ~ m ." en ii1 ~ m :I: IP 9 .3 ;0 ø en CJ A ¿¡ () ºn g ~ m f!- en ~ co ð iii m II~ ¡;;¡ ¿¡ ~ ~~ '" m V ,. c: ;:; ,. :0 ~ :¡; :0 '" ?: 0 '" m ~ I ! ì I I ¡ ¡ I I I ! I 11 ! i I I I i I I .:¡- ' ,,~'. ¡ )i-,'f¡I )1.1 .. i,J?-~~ "11'46"£ <\' i~ ?1' _ _. _ _ I _ _ I _ _, _ _ I _ _ I _ - I - - 1 - - I - - I __ 6111_-,__1_-1 . ~ ~¡ ~ . , . i .~ ~ · ì t , ~ ì .~I -.J ~ ~! ~ . ~ OS, , 0 ~! m~'ŠO~7i'~T-2õã0õ'""'! l "'1 I :~ "- ~~t \ :5 · ,~¡ ~ ~ '~', ~ R ' I~-~ ~ .. ~ I L__~-.-J :g · ~ I I . + _._..... ,._...,....-t;", :; :; -:-"~hi.m;~,;¡- --,;;¡ i1:fM¡-:-" -.J ,......,- ..'. .. · ì , I + · · .t , ~ i . ¡ . .T tJ1' ~I 01 ! I ì I I I I I \ i I I I I I I ¡__..._"_.._.,~.,,.~w.. ..50 U T:...#. .... 2_,~-th,. __...SI R .££ T.-,~. ~ CROSSROADS MARTIN SELF STORAGE - FLUCCS FT. PIERCE, FLORIDA Environmental Consultants, Inc. 12111 SW 27th lItnet. Suite 2. PÙD aV. J'1oñda 1'180 Ph_: 718-221-11100 Po: 771-1118-11108 SCALE: 112'.. 60' DATE: 07.11.05 SHEET: 1 OF 1 DRAWN BY: JA SOUTH FLORIDA WATER MANAGEMENT DISTRICT 3301 Gun Club Road, West Palm Beach, Florida 33406 . (561) 686-8800 . FL WATS 1-800-432-2045 . TOO (561) 697-2574 Mailing Address: P.O. Box 24680, West Palm Beach, FL 33416-4680 . www.sfwmd.gov CON 24-06 Environmental Resource Regulation Pre-Application No. 050322-15 May 20, 2005 Jennifer Acevedo Crossroads Environmental Consulting, Inc. 1251 SW 2ih St., Suite 2 Palm City FL 32990 Subject: Edwards Rd/2Sth St Parcel St. Lucie County, S201T3S5/R40E Dear Ms. Acevedo: The District offers the following in response to your request for a determination of wetland boundaries and other surface waters located within the subject property. A review of the submitted information and District records was conducted. Based on this information and a site visit conducted on May 18, 2005, this 14.26-acre site does not contain wetlands as defined by Chapter 62-340 Florida Administrative Code (FAC). This correspondence is an informal pre-application wetland determination pursuant to Chapter 373, Florida Statutes. It does not bind the District, its agents or employees, nor does it convey any legal rights, expressed or implied. Persons obtaining this informal pre-application wetland determination are not entitled to rely upon it for purposes of compliance with provision of law or District rules. A binding wetland determination may be obtained by petitioning the South Florida Water Management District for a wetland declaratory statement pursuant to FAC Rule 62-340 or by applying for an Environmental Resource permit. Please be advised that although this site may not contain lands jurisdictional under State rules, there may be wetlands and/or other waters of the United States present under federal rUles. Dredging or filling in such areas may require a Department of Army (DA) permit. Receipt of a state or local government permit does not obviate the need to obtain a DA permit prior to commencing work. For more information about the DA Regulatory Program, you may access the Corps' website at: http://www.saj.usace.army.mil/permit/index.html. You may also contact the !ocal Corps regulatory office for additional information, at 561-472-3504. A file has been set up at the West Palm Beach office with pre-application materials. If you have any further questions, please contact me at (561) 682-2925. Sincerely, /~<~ Robin Burgess Environmental Analyst Natural Resources Management Division Attachment GOVERNING BOARD EXECUTIVE OFFICE Kevin McCarty, Chair lrela M. Bagué, Vice-Chair Pamela Brooks-Thomas Alice J. Carlson Michael Collins Nicolás J. Gutiérrez, Jr., Esq. Lennart E. Lindahl, P.E. Harkley R. Thornton Malcolm 5. Wade, Jr. Henry Dean, Executive Director Cc: USACOE - Palm Beach Gardens (with aerial) bc: R. Burgess S.McNabb, Martin-St. Lucie Service Center (with aerial) File TRAFFIC IMPACT STATEMENT For SABIN/EDWARDS ROAD In St. Lucie County Prepared By Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. 2980 South 25th Street Ft. Pierce, FL 34981 June 2005 (Updated January 2006) , ,1! I'} 'i ":1(15 ' . .. I c..... Luu Sabin/Edwards Road Development - Traffic Impact Study Table of Contents Table of Contents...........................................................................·..······..········..········..···.. ........... .................. I INTRODUCTION: .................................................................. ....................................... ........... ..................... 2 DEFINITION OF STUDY AREA: ................................................................................................................2 INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES ................................................................................................. 4 Roadways: ............................................................................................................. ...... ............ ............ ....... 4 Intersections: ............................................................................................................ ....... ........ .................... 5 EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS: .......................................................................................................... 6 PROPOSED TRAFFIC GENERATION.................................................·····.·.. ......... ............ ....... .... .... .......... 7 Trip Distribution: ............................................................................................................ ..... ............. .......... 7 TRAFFIC ANALYSIS: ............................................................................................. ......... ...... ........ .... .......... 9 Link Analysis:..................................................................................·····················..· ...... ......... .................... 9 Intersection Analysis: ......... .................................................. .............. ...................................................... 11 CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDATIONS: .......... .................... ..... ......................................................... 15 REFERENCES.... ............................................................................................................ ..... ................ ........ 16 PRE-DEVELOPMENT.................................................................................... ............... ........ .......... ........... 17 CAP ACITY ANALYSIS POST-DEVELOPMENT. ................................................................................................... ........... ......... ...... 18 CAPACITY ANALYSIS OTHER TRAFFIC STUDIES BACK-UP TRAFFIC DATA Page 1 P:IProj-200SIOS-I46 Traffic Impact -Sabin CompanieslReports\OS, I 46Tis,doc Sabin/Edwards Road Development - Traffic Impact Study INTRODUCTION: The fInn of Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. has been retained to perfonn a traffic analysis of the impacts associated with the construction of a Mixed Use Development, which will be located in St. Lucie County, Florida. The site is 13.8 acres in size and is located at the northwest side of the Edwards Road and South 25th Street intersection as shown graphically on Figure No. 1. The project will have one access point located along Edwards Road. The Project will consist of the development of80 multi-family residential dwelling units and 94,000 square feet of self-storage units. It is estimated that build-out will occur within the next two years. This study will analyze the impacts associated with the development of the proposed project, estimate the anticipated trips generated, and determine if any roadway improvements are warranted due to the increase in traffic in the existing roadway network. DEFINITION OF STUDY AREA: The study area, as defIned by the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, Section 11.02.09.9B, shall be a 2 mile radius of the site which includes all major roadways and intersections within the zone of influence. The following links and intersections will be analyzed for project impacts: Roadway Links: 25th St south of Edwards Road 25th St north of Edwards Road Edwards Road west of 25th Street Edwards Road east of 25th Street In tersections: 25th St and Edwards Road Edwards Road and Sunrise Boulevard Edwards Road and Selvitz Road P:\Proj-200SIOS-146 Traffic Impact -Sabin Companies:ReponslOS, I 46Tis,doc Page 2 ~ T I- >tr I ( ~1. j IT ~U L'-'~ '(;_~ 1 i ~ ,~~ ~ ~/ ~ I --- == ~ = ~~ X)xix"'x -- ~..,.. n..r.ltI þi. :-r ~ ): )( &1 W- '- ~~ ")f 1. Yi/ ._,?J, ~ F I--- ð II:: crt ~ ¡: ~ U -=- .... en u z s;¡¡ en z s;¡¡ z w , ... I ~H-rt- Ë: ) 7.~- ~ ~~ /"C -, <q L -- I r (IF 2 Ï"- I ,::.! 7-- i-- I ,- I I. I} ~) - I _ _ r1 ! EDWARfS RO~-::: (@J ~ ED 'ARCS ROAD::U~ -.--0? -J~ ~~~ ~~ ~ /'// ~ SITE A '=" -vJ ~ #"- ~~LJ ~~~ ~ W II:: .tñ ~ .... Il) N L Y 70 \ ~~V ~ ~ ......... DO \ ~ - L :::::..., /~~I ---- ~ o II:: ~~ rrnl' ¡ 5 o en 1- WEATH § w CII ... ... t ,;; on ~ s t I i !;;. I 6-9-05 ~ 05-146TRAF I I I ¡ :¡; ~ ~ g Q: ~ / ~ ~ MIDWAY ROAD -y x ~-~ "I ~ ì,~~·~r ß»' ~ ~ç:~ ')(\ tl~ -,-- r r , -1 - - - - -,--- I- -- f--- I--- Lr- " ~ - FIGURE 1 CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2980 SOUTH 25th SlREET FORT PIERCE. FLORIDA 34981 (772) 464-3537 (1LCULPEPPER .. -~¡;;;TERPENING.'NC. SABINE/EDWARDS ROAD LOCATION MAP SabinlEdwards Road Development - Traffic Impact Study INVENTORY OF EXISTING FACILITIES Roadways: 25th Street 25'" Street is classified as a State Two-Way Arterial Interrupted Flow Class I roadway. The portion of 25th St, which is located within the study area, is currently a 2-lane undivided rural roadway south of Edwards Road and a 5-lane undivided urban roadway north of Edwards Road. All of the travel lanes are 12 feet in width. The existing right-of-way varies from 80 to 120 foot in width. 25th Street is maintained by St. Lucie County and currently operates at LOS F south of Edwards Road. The LOS is based on the Annual Average Daily Traffic volumes as established in the "St. Lucie Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Spring, 2005 Traffic Counts" and applied to the FOOT Generalized Daily Level of Service tables. It should be noted that the County has funded in their 5 year eIP and scheduled the widening of 25th Street to a four-lane divided section from Edwards Road to Midway Road. Construction is currently underway with completion next year. Edwards Road (SR 6 I I) Edwards Road is classified as a State Two-Way Arterial Interrupted Flow Class I Roadway. The portion of Edwards Road, which is located within the study area, is a 4 lane divided roadway that transitions to a 2- lane undivided rural roadway. All lanes are 12 feet in width. The existing Edwards Road right-of-way is 120 feet in width east of the 25th Street intersection and varies from 80 to 120 feet west of the intersection. Edwards Road is maintained by St. Lucie County, and currently operates at LOS C. The LOS is based on the Annual Average Daily Traffic volumes as established in the "St. Lucie Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Spring, 2005 Traffic Counts" and applied to the FOOT Generalized Daily Level of Service tables. P:\Proj-200SIOS, I 46 Traffic Impact -Sabin CompaniesIReportsIOS-146Tis,doc Page 4 Sabin/Edwards Road Development - Traffic Impact Study Intersection: 25th St & Edwards Road The 25th St and Edwards Road intersection is fully signalized. The intersection geometry is as follows: Westbound Eastbound I Lane Left I Lane Thru I Lane Right & Thru Southbound I Lane Left I Lane Thru I Lane Right 1 Lane Right & Thru 1 Lane Thru 1 Lane Left Northbound I Lane Right & Thru I Lane Thru I Lane Left Edwards Road & Sunrise Boulevard The Edwards Road and Sunrise Boulevard intersection is fully signalized. The intersection geometry is as ~~: « Westbound Eastbound I Lane Left I Lane Thru I Lane Right & Thru Southbound 1 Lane Left I Lane Thru/Rt I Lane Right & Thru 1 Lane Thru I Lane Left Northbound 1 Lane Right I Lane Thru I Lane Left Edwards Road & Selvitz Road The Edwards Road and Selvitz Road intersection is fully signalized. The intersection geometry is as follows: Westbound Eastbound 1 Lane Left 1 Lane Thru Northbound 1 Lane Left 1 Lane Right 1 Lane Right & Thru Page 5 P:IPn>j-200SIOS-146 Traffic Impact -Sabin CompanieslReportslOS,146Tis,doc Sabin/Edwards Road Development - Traffic Impact Study EXISTING TRAFFIC CONDITIONS: The Annual Average Daily Traffic volumes for the roadways located within the study area were obtained from the "St. Lucie Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Spring, 2005 Traffic Counts". The committed trips include the recently approved Oak Alley and Frontera projects and are tabulated as follows: AADT AADT & LOS Committed South 25th Street North of Edwards Road 19,400 20,540 B South of Edwards Road 16, 100 17,303 F Edwards Road East of 25th Street 19, 100 19,957 B West of 25th Street 11,400 12,398 C West of Selvitz Road 10,000 10,998 C P:\Proj-200S\OS-146 Traffic Impact -Sabin CompaniesIReportsIOS-146Tis,doc Page 6 Sabin/Edwards Road Development - Traffic Impact Study PROPOSED TRAFFIC GENERATION The additional traffic, which will be generated by the development of the Project, is based upon the number and type of residential dwellings and commercial square footage. The Institute of Transportation Engineer's Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition, Code 230, Residential Condominium/Townhouses and Code 151, Mini-warehouses were used for the project. The trip generation of the facility for both the Average Daily Traffic and PM Peak Hour Traffic is calculated as follows: Table No.1 Average Daily Traffic Land Use Multi- Family Self-Storage ITE Code 230 N/A Units/SF 80 94,000 ADT Rates .85Ln(80) + 2.55 1.01Ln(94) + .82 ADT 531 VPD 233 VPD Total 754 VPD Table No.2 PM Peak Hour Traffic Multi-Family Self-S torage .82Ln(80) + .32 1.02 Ln(94) - 1.49 Directional Distribution Enter 67% 51% Directional Volumes Land Use Peak Hour A vg. Units/SF Rate 80 94,000 Exit 33% 49% Total Enter 34 vph 12 vph 46 vph Exit 16 vph II vph 27 vph Trip Distribution: The trip distribution from the site onto the eXIstmg roadway network was derived based upon the sWTounding attractor type facilities located within the surrounding area. The distribution and trip assignments are portrayed in Figure 2. A summary of the Major Trip Assignments and associated traffic volumes were estimated as follows: Percent ADT Volume South 25th Street North of Edwards Road 20% 151 VPD South of Edwards Road 20% 151 VPD Edwards Road West ofProjcct 40~'~ 302 VPD West of 25th Strect 60% 452 VPD East of 25th Street 20% 151 VPD The Trip Assignments for the Peak Hour Movements were derived based upon the distributions and associated turning movements. The Exit/Enter splits as well as the turning movement volumes are derived from the trip generations calculated above. Page 7 P:\Proj-200SI0S-146 Traffic Impact -Sabin Companies\Reports'OS-146Tis,doc 30" 10,000 142 148 226 10,516 .. .. I ~ , ÏIi I OJ ì I i I I I ! ! i Ä. o t ð 10" a: J ~ > ..J W rn 9-29-05 05-146 TRAf .. .. 40" 11,400 142 148 302 11,992 (TCULPEPPER .. -ßE;;;;;TERPENING,INC. 20% t 19,400 992 I 148 . 151 20,691 tü 0 5" a: t 5,700 W < a: > 283 ~ W 37 rn ..J ¡ :::) 38 . 0 = 6,058 It) en N 19,100 W 13,200 J: 709 rn 283 - ~ 148 a: 111 :::) 151 Z 75 0 :::) rn 20,108 rn 13,669 20" 10" .. .. .. .. EDWARDS ROAD ... ... 20" 5" 60" t 16,100 t 4,400 11,400 850 907 0 148 J 296 J 0 452 151 38 12,850 17,454 4,438 LEGEND XXX AADT XXX FRONTERA XXX OAK AlLEY XXX PROJECT TRAFFIC XXX TRIP DISTRIBUTION FIGURE 2 SABINB/ED"'ABDS ROAD DEVELOPMENT CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2980 SOUTH 25th STREET FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34981 (772) 464-3537 DISTRIBUTION BY PERCENT Sabin/Edwards Road Development - Traffic Impact Study TRAFFIC ANALYSIS: The methodology used in this report to detennine the impacts that the development will have on the surrounding roadway network is to compare the pre-development conditions to the post-development conditions. The pre-existing conditions were derived by using the St. Lucie Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization's Spring 2005 annual count infonnation and intersection and turning movement counts taken by Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. on April 27 and 28, 2004, and September, 27, 2005. Link Analysis: The Trip Assignment volumes calculated for this project were added to the existing volumes and previously committed trips assigned to each roadway link within the defined study area. To detennine the link Level of Service, Table 4-1 of the Florida Department of Transportation, 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook was used for both the Pre-Development (Existing and Committed Traffic) and Post- Development conditions. Please note that the Post-Development conditions for 25th Street assume the proposed 4-lane configuration already designed. The following is a summary of the results: Roadwav Link LOSC Volume/LOS Volume/LOS Development Capacity Pre- Post- 25th St North of Edwards Road 34,700 20,540/B 20,691/B 25th St South of Edwards Road 34,700 17,303/B 17,454/B Edwards Road West of Selvitz 13,800 10,290/C 10,516/C Edwards Road West of Project 13,800 11,690/C 11,992/C Edwards Road West of 25th Street 34,700 12,398/C 12,850/C Edwards Road East of 25th Street 34,700 19,957/B 20,108/8 Page 9 P:\Proj-200SIOS-146 Traffic Impact -Sabin CompaniesIReportsIOS-146Tis,doc TABLE 4 - 1 GENERALIZED ANNUAL AVERAGE DAILY VOLUMES FOR FLORIDA'S URBANIZED AREAS· UNINTERRUPTED FLOW IDGHWA YS FREEWAYS Level of Service Interchange spacing ~ 2 mi. apart Lanes Divided A B C D E Level of Service 2 Undivided 2,000 7,000 13,800 19,600 27,000 Lanes A B C D E 4 Divided 20,400 33,000 47,800 61,800 70,200 4 23,800 39,600 55,200 67,100 74,600 6 Divided 30.S00 49,500 71,600 92,700 IOS,400 6 36,900 61,100 85,300 103,600 115,300 STATE TWO-WAY ARTERIALS 8 49,900 82,700 115,300 140,200 IS6,OOO Class I (>0.00 to 1.99 signalized intersections per mile) 10 63,000 104,200 145,500 176,900 196,400 Level of Service 12 7S,900 125,800 175,500 213,SOO 237,100 Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Undivided .. 4.200 13,800 16,400 16,900 Interchange spacing < 2 nú. apart 4 Divided 4.800 29.300 34,700 3S,700 ... Level of Service 6 Divided 7,300 44,700 52,100 53,SOO ... Lanes A B C D E 8 Divided 9.400 58,000 66,100 67,800 ... 4 22,000 36,000 52,000 67,200 76,500 6 34,800 56,500 81,700 105,800 120,200 Class II (2.00 to 4.50 signalized intersections per fiÚle) 8 47,500 77,000 111,400 144,300 163,900 Level of Service 10 60,200 97,500 141,200 182,600 207,600 Lanes Divided A B C D E 12 72,900 118,100 170,900 221,100 2SI,200 2 Undivided .. 1,900 11,200 15,400 16,300 4 Divided .. 4,100 26,000 32,700 34.500 6 Divided .. 6,500 40,300 49,200 51,800 BICYCLE MODE 8 Divided .. 8,500 53.300 63,800 67.000 (Note: Level of service for the bicycle mode in this table is based on roadway geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of bicyclists Class III (more than 4.S signalized intersections per núle and not using the fàciIity.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number within primary city central business district of an of directional roadway lanes to detemùne two-way maximum service volumes.) urbanized area over 750.(00) Paved Shoulder! Level of Service Bicycle Lane Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E Coverage A B C D E 2 Undivided .. .. S,300 12,600 15,500 049"/ó .. .. 3,200 13.800 >13.800 4 Divided .. .. 12,400 28,900 32,800 50-84% .. 2,500 4,100 >4,100 ... 6 Divided .. .. 19,500 44,700 49,300 8S-100% 3,100 7,200 >7,200 ... ... 8 Divided .. .. 25,800 58,700 63,800 Florida Department of Transportation Systems Planning Office 60S Suwannee Street, MS 19 ONE- WAY F AClLITlES Tallahassee, FL 32399-04S0 Decrease corresponding two-directionaI volumes in this table by 40% to http://wwwll.myflorida.comlplanninglsystemslsmllosldefault.htm obtain the eQuivalent one directional volume for one-wav facilities. "ThiI ...... does no! COtUtÍIW a SW1danI and should be used only for ......... plalll1in8 applications. The compu.... models from which this ....1. is derived should be used for more specilic p1annm, appIic:.nons. The....1e IIId deriviDl computer models should not be used for corridor or inlenec:lion cIesip. where more relined Iedutiq.... exist. Values shown are two-way annuala""rag. daily vol...... (baaed ... K,.. foeton) for .....Is of service and are for the automobilel1nld< modes unl... speeif&eally stated. Level of service letter pade threaholds are probably not comparable across modes and. therefore. <nIII modal eompariaons should be made with caution, FUlIhennore. combining levels of service of diffemtt modes into one o""raII roadway level of service is 001 re<:ommended. The table's input val.. deflUlta and level of.....ice c:riteria appear on lhe following page. Calculations are hosed 011 planniDlapplications oflhe Highway Capacity Manual. Bicyde WS Model. Pedestrian WS Modelllld TlIIISit Ca¡oecity IIId Quality ofSemce Manual, ",speeri""ly for the automobile/tnK;k, bicycle. pedestrian and bus modes. ·0CInn0c be achieved using table input value d.fa.lta, ···Not applåcable fot that level of service letter grade. For automobile/truck modes, volumes crater than level of service D become F because inlersection capacities have been reached. For bicycle and pecIntrian modes. the I.vel of servic:e lell« grade (i...loding F) is not achievable. bec:ause there is no maximum vehicle volume threshold using table input value defaults. Class IV (more than 4.5 signalized intersections per nùle and within primary city central business district of an wbanized 8Wi over 750,(00) Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Undivided .. .. S,200 13,700 15,000 4 Divided .. .. 12,300 30,300 31,700 6 Divided .. .. 19,100 45,800 47,600 8 Divided .. .. 25,900 59,900 62,200 NON-STATE ROADWAYS Major City/County Roadways Level of Service Lanes Divided A B C D E 2 Undivided .. .. 9,100 14.600 15,600 4 Divided .. .. 21,400 31,100 32,900 6 Divided .. .. 33,400 46,800 49,300 Lanes Divided 2 Undivided 4 Divided Other Signalized Roadways (signaliz~ int~rs~ction analysis) Level of Service B C .. 4,800 .. 11,100 E 12,600 2S,200 02122/02 A D 10,000 21.700 .. .. Source: PEDESTRIAN MODE (Note: Level of service for the pedestrian mode in this table is based on roadway geometries at 40 mph posted speed and traffic conditions, not number of pedestrians using the facility.) (Multiply motorized vehicle volumes shown below by number of directional roadway lanes to detemùne two-way maximum service volumes.) Level of Service C D .. 6,400 .. 9,900 II ,300 > 11,300 Sidewalk Coverage 049% 50-84% 85-100% A B E IS,SOO 19,000 .u .. .. .. .. .. 2.200 BUS MODE (Scheduled Fixed Route) (Buses per hour) (N.te: _ per hour shown are ...Iy for the peak Hur in the slae" directioa ofth. highertraliic flow.) Level of Service Sidewalk Coverage ABC D 0-84% .. >5 2:4 2:3 85-100% >6 >4 ~3 2:2 ARTERlAlJNON-ST A TE ROADWAY ADJUSTMENTS DlVIDEDIUNDIVIDED (alter cOlTCcponding volume by the indicated percent) Mt:dian Left Tums Laues Adjustment Faclors Divided Yes +S% Undivided No -20"10 Undivided Yes -S% Undivided No -2S% E 2:2 2:1 Lanes 2 2 Multi Multi 85 Sabin/Edwards Road Development - Traffic Impact Study Intersection Analysis: The project's major impact on intersecting roadways was analyzed for the peak traffic conditions for the PM Peak Hour of roadway traffic to determine what geometric lane configuration would be required to maintain an acceptable Level of Service. Turning movement counts for the intersections of 25th Street with Edwards Road were administered by our office on April 27 and 28, 2004; September 27,2005 and the Pre- Development and Post-Development turning movements are depicted on Figures 3, 4 & 5. The following is a summary of the results of the Levels of Service for each approach and the overall intersection. A detailed analysis of each lane group in a graphical representation of the lane geometry for each of the studied intersections can be found in the attached Appendix A for the Pre-Development conditions and Appendix B for the Post-Development Conditions. A summary of the intersection capacity is as follows: 25th Street & Edwards Road PM Peak Hour Approach Pre-Development Post-Development Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection D D C C D D D C C D Edwards Road & Sunrise Boulevard PM Peak Hour Approach Pre-Development Post-Development Eastbound Westbound Northbound Southbound Intersection B C C D C C C C D C Edwards Road & Selvitz Road PM Peak Hour Approach Pre-Development Post-Development Eastbound Westbound Nnrthhnllncl Intersection C A J) C B B V C Page 11 P:IProj-200SIOS-I46 Traffic Impact -Sabin CompanieslReportslOS, I 46Tis,doc 150 o 27 +9 186 746 9 36 +0 791 280 o o +0 280 EDWARDS ROAD 166+0+15+5=186 346+0+ 15+5=366 72+2+0+5=79 I =:1 éi ~ I CI' t i ... ~ i í 9-29-05 § 05-146 lRAF I I i , j g ä: (1I:CULPEPPER '" -~¡;;;;;;TERPENING,INC. j .... ~ .... W w a:: I- m . s::. .. &t) N :z:: .... :) o m ~ 261+0+0+0=261 ~ 370+0+45+9=424 LEGEND XXX EXISTING lRAFFlC XXX OAK ALLEY XXX FRONTERA XXX PROJECT lRAFFlC XXX TOTAL lRAFFIC CONSUL llNG ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2980 SOUTIi 25th SlREET FORT PIERCE, FlORIDA 34981 (772) 464-3537 . 190+6+18+0=214 111 2 o +9 122 544 78 8 6 20 10 +0 +0 572 94 FIGURE 3 SABINE/EDWARDS ROAD DEVELOPMENT BD'I'ARDB AND _m. STRBIT P.Jl. PaK HOUR TURNING JfOVDBNTS 100 o 18 +2 120 182 o o +0 182 ~ 68 o o +0 68 c a: <t > W ..J ;:) o In W UJ - a: z ;:) UJ ~ EDWARDS ROAD 54+0+18+1=73 475+0+18+3=496 .... 81 94 21 0 0 0 89+0+9+1=99 ~ 9 0 0 +2 +0 +0 92 94 21 I ... N ;¡ '"' I ~ t :~ j I I 9-29-05 , 05-146 lRAF I I I ! , i: C1!:CULPEPPER .. -~~TERPENING.'NC. LEGEND XXX EXISTING TRAFFIC XXX OAK ALLEY XXX FRONTERA XXX PROJECT TRAFFIC XXX TOTAL TRAFFIC CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2980 SOUTH 25th STREET FORT PIERCE. FLORIDA 34981 (772) 464-3537 ~ 68+0+0+0=68 600+0+18+5=623 . 28+0+ 0+0= 28 FIGURE 4- SABINE/EDWARDS ROAD DEVELOP.IŒNT BDW'jJU)S .AND SUNJUSB BLVD. P.Jf. PEAK HOUR TURNING J(OVDDTS 257+0+9+14=280 268+0+0+0=268 ~ . EDWARDS ROAD I , 8 . I '" t I ... j « t=. ! 9-29-05 ~ 05-146 TRAF I I f , f ~ ¡: C1LCULPEPPER .. -ß==TERPENING.,NC. 296+0+14+8=318 ~ 263+0+0+3=266 c ~ c( 0 233 226 Œ: 0 0 ~ 0 0 +0 _4 - 233 230 > ..J W UJ LEGEND XXX EXISTING lRAFFlC XXX OAK ALlEY XXX FRONTERA XXX PROJECT lRAFFlC XXX TOTAL lRAFFlC FIGURE ð CONSULTING ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2980 SOUTH 25th SlREET FORT PIERCE. FLORIDA 34981 (772) 464-3537 SABINE/EDWARDS ROAD DEVELOPIlENT BD1fARDS AND SBLVITZ ROAD P.K. PBAK HOUR TUBNlNG KOvmmN'J'S Sabin/Edwards Road Development - Traffic Impact Study CONCLUSIONS & RECOMMENDA nONS: The results of the traffic analysis conducted by this office indicate that the existing roadway network will not experience a decrease in Level-of-Service standards below that which is currently experienced due to the construction of the Sabin/Edwards Road Development. We would however recommend that the main project entrance along Edwards Road be constructed with the appropriate turn lanes to enhance safety due to the average speed of the traveling public on the roadway. Submitted By: & TERPENING, INC. Page 15 P:\Proj-200S\OS-146 Traffic Impact ,Sabin Companl<.'ReportsìOS-146Tis,doc Sabin/Edwards Road Development - Traffic Impact Study REFERENCES I. St. Lucie Urban Area Metropolitan Planning Organization Spring 2005 Traffic Counts. 2. Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, 1994, Special Report 209. 3. Florida Department of Transportation 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook. 4. Institute of Transportation Engineers, Trip Generation Manual, Seventh Edition. 5. HCS 2000 Highway Capacity Software. Page 16 P:lProj-200SIOS-146 Traffic Impact -Sabin Companies\Reports\OS-146Tis,doc Sabin/Edwards Road Development - Traffic Impact Study PRE-DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY ANALYSIS P:\Proj-200SIOS-I46 Traffic Impact -Sobin Compouies\Reports\OS-146Tis,doc Page 17 Full Report Page I of3 FULL REPORT General Information !SIte Information !Analyst skm Intersection S. 25th St & Edwards Rd !Agency or Co. St. Lucie County Area Type All other areas þàte Performed 9/29/05 Jurisdiction St. Lucie County ~ime Period PM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2006 Intersection Geometrv Grade = 0 1 2 1 ) ! l Grade = 0 1 ~ 0 2 --r ~ 2 0 r 1 Grade = 0 1 r Grade = 0 1 2 0 Volume and Timina InDut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume (vph) 181 361 74 214 397 261 113 572 94 280 791 177 % HeaVY veh 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Actuated (PIA) P P P P P P P P P P P P StartuD lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Ext. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ~rrival tvoe 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Þed/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12,0 Parking (Y or N) N N N N N N N N IParkinglhr us stopslhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Exci.Left NS Perm 07 08 h-iming G = 7.8 G = 21.8 G= G= G= 5.0 G = 38.0 G= G- Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y- Duration of Analysis (hrs =0.25 Cvcle Lenath C = 92.6 fi IPo' / Ie'. ·\nnr.nmPont~% ?Oßncf% ?O!';etti n ~~\~matthes. CTTN C\ Local%20Settim!s\ TEMP\s2k55... 9/2912005 Full Report Page 2 of3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SA TURA TION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET General Information Project Description Sabin/Edwards Road - Pre with committed Volume Adjustment EB we NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 181 361 74 214 397 261 113 572 94 280 791 177 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow Rate 191 380 78 225 418 275 119 602 99 295 833 186 ane Group L TR L TR L TR L T R ~dj. flow rate 191 458 225 693 119 701 295 833 186 Prop. L T or RT 0.000 -- 0.170 0.000 - 0.397 10·000 - 0.141 10·000 - 0.000 Saturation Flow Rate Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 ~um. of lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 ~ 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 HV 0.952 10.952 0.952 0.952 10·952 0.952 10·952 0,952 k,I.952 "9 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 P 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Ira 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 flU 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 flT 0.950 1.000 - '0.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - Secondary fL T 0.149 - 0.289 - 0.200 - 0.259 - ~T - 0.974 - 10.940 -- 0.979 -- 1.000 ~.850 n.pb 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 - rRpb - 1.000 - 1.000 - 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 ~dj. satflow 1719 ~350 1719 3233 1719 3365 1719 3438 1538 Sec. adj. satflow 270 - 523 -- 362 - 469 - fiJe:/ /C:\Documents%20and%20Settimzs\smatthes. CTIN C\Local%20Settin Q's\ TEMP\s2k55,.. 9/29/2005 Full Report Page 3 of3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET General Information Project Description Sabin/Edwards Road - Pre with committed !Capacity Analysis EB WB NB SB ane group L TR L TR L TR L T R Adj. flow rate 191 458 225 693 119 701 295 833 186 Satflow rate 1719 3350 1719 3233 1719 3365 1719 3438 1538 Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green 'ratio 0.37 0.24 0.37 0.24 0.52 0.41 0.52 0.41 0.41 ane group cap. 223 789 296 761 261 1381 311 1411 631 'rrI/c ratio 0.86 0.58 0.76 0.91 0.46 0.51 0.95 0.59 0.29 Flow ratio 0.14 0.21 0.21 0.24 0.12 Crit. lane group N N N Y N N N N N !sum flow ratios 0.78 ~ost time/cycle 15.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.93 Lane Group Capacit to Control Dela~ and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB Lane group L TR L TR L TR L T R Adj. flow rate 191 458 225 693 119 701 295 833 186 ane group cap. 223 789 296 761 261 1381 311 1411 631 'rrI/c ratio 0.86 0.58 0.76 0.91 0.46 0.51 0.95 0.59 0.29 Green ratio 0.37 0.24 0.37 0.24 0.52 0.41 0.52 0.41 0.41 Unif. delay d1 22.7 31.4 27.9 34.5 13.6 20.3 28.6 21.2 18.3 belay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 32.2 3.1 16.7 17.0 5.6 1.3 39.5 1.8 1.2 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 54.9 34.5 44.6 51.4 19.3 21.7 68.1 23.1 19.5 ~ne group LOS D C D D B C E C B ~pprch. delay 40.5 49.7 21.3 32.7 Approach LOS D D C C Intersec. delay 35.8 Intersection LOS 0 HCS](HHJ™ Copyright e 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.lc fi le:IIC::\J)oeuments%20sncf%20Settinps\smstth~. rTTN r\ T .oes 1%20Settinps\ TRMP\s2k ~ ~... 9/29/200'\ FuJI Report Page ] of 3 FULL REPORT General Information ISlte Information Analyst skm Intersection Edwards Rd & Sunrise Blvd Agency or Co. St. Lucie County Area Type All other areas Date Performed 9/29/05 Jurisdiction St. Lucie County '""ime Period PM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2006 Intersection Geometry Grade = 0 0 1 1 ~ l Grade = 0 1 --.J' 0 2 ~ 1- 2 0 of 1 Grade = 0 1 1 ( Grade = 0 1 1 1 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume (vph) 54 475 89 28 600 68 81 94 21 68 182 100 % Heavv veh 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ctuated (PIA) P P P P P P P P P P P P tartuD lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 xt. eft. creen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival tvpe 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 I.j nit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 L..ane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking (Y or N) N N N N N N N N Parkinglhr us stopslhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 liming G= 7.5 G = 31.8 G= G= G= 5.6 G = 18.0 G= G- Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis {hrs = 0.25 ~ycle Length C = 82.9 f11".·/Ir·\nnl'l1mpnh10/^ ?()~ntto/,. ?()~pttinoc;:\~~tthpc;: rTTNr'\ Tnr.ßI0/,. "O~ptt1noc;:\TF.MP\c;:71c~t\ Q/?Q/?OO~ Full Report Page 2 of3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET General Information Project Description Sabin/Edwards Road - Pre with committed !Volume Adjustment EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT ¡Volume 54 475 89 28 600 68 81 94 21 68 182 100 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ~dj. Flow Rate 57 500 94 29 632 72 85 99 22 72 192 105 Lane Group L TR L TR L T R L TR Adj. flow rate 57 594 29 704 85 99 22 72 297 Prop. L T or RT kJ.OOO -- 0.158 0.000 -- 0.102 0.000 - 0.000 0.000 -- 0,354 Saturation Flow Rate Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 FW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ~V þ.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 0,952 9 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fp 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 a 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 . flU 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 -- 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 -- 0.950 1.000 -- Secondary fL T 0.246 -- 0.303 - 0.256 - kJ.542 - fRT - 0.976 - kJ.985 - 1.000 0.850 -- 0.947 ~pb 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- Rpb -- 1.000 - 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 Adj. satflow 1719 3356 1719 3385 1719 1810 1538 1719 1714 Sec. adj. satflow 445 - 548 - 463 -- 981 -- fi1e~ I If". :\f>ocI1ment~%?Oanct% ?O~ettin p~\~matth~ f".TTN r\ T .oca 1%?O~ettin p~\ TFMP\~?kC¡f\. .. Q/2Q/200C¡ Full Report Page 3 of3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET General Information Project Description Sabin/Edwards Road - Pre with committed CaDacitv Analvsis EB WB NB SB ane group L TR L TR L T R L TR IAdj. flow rate 57 594 29 704 85 99 22 72 297 ~atfJow rate 1719 3356 1719 3385 1719 1810 1538 1719 1714 L.ost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green ratio 0.53 0.38 0.53 0.38 0.34 0.22 0.22 0.34 0.22 ane group cap. 354 1287 399 1298 244 393 334 388 372 "/c ratio 0.16 0.46 0.07 0.54 0.35 0.25 0.07 0.19 0.80 iJ:"ow ratio 0.18 0.21 0.05 0.01 0.17 Crit. lane group N N N y N N N N y Sum flow ratios 0.46 ost time/cycle 20.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.61 !Lane GrOUD CaDacit~. Control Delay and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB ~ane group L TR L TR L T R L TR Adj. flow rate 57 594 29 704 85 99 22 72 297 ane group cap. 354 1287 399 1298 244 393 334 388 372 'r'J/c ratio 0.16 0.46 0.07 0.54 0.35 0.25 0.07 0.19 0.80 Green ratio 0.53 0.38 0.53 0.38 0.34 0.22 0.22 0.34 0.22 Unif. delay d 1 10.4 19.1 9.9 19.9 19.8 26.9 25.8 18.7 30.7 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 ncrem. delay d2 1.0 1.2 0.4 1.6 3.9 1.5 0.4 1. 1 16.3 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 11.4 20.3 10.2 21.5 23.7 28.4 26.2 19.8 47.0 Lane group LOS B C B C C C C B D ~pprch. delay 19.6 21.1 26.2 41.7 Approach LOS B C C D ntersec. delay 25.0 Intersection LOS C HCS1()((JTM Copyright C 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4,1 c file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settinszs\smatthes.CTINC\Local%2OSettinszs\TEMP\s2k56... 9/29/2005 Full Report Page I of3 General Information Analyst Agency or Co. Date Performed ~ime Period FULL REPORT Site Information skm St. Lucie County 9/29/05 PM Peak Hour Intersection Area Type ~urisdiction !Analysis Year Edwards Rd & Selvitz Road All other areas St. Lucie County 2006 ntersectlon Geometrv Grade = 000 Grade = 0 0 0 1 ---r .-- 1 0 r 1 Grade = 0 1 ( Grade = 0 1 0 1 Volume and Timing InDut EB we NB 5B LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT olume (vph) 266 268 263 310 233 226 % Heavv veh 5 5 5 5 5 5 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ~ctuated (PIA) P P P P P P tartuD lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 xt. eff. areen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival tvDe 3 3 3 3 3 Unit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/Bike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 Lane Width 12.U 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking (Y or N) N N N N N N N N Parkinglhr Bus stops/hr 0 0 0 0 0 Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 we Only EW Perm 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 Timing G= 9.6 G = 34.1 G= G= G = 16.6 G= G= G= Y= 5 y= 5 y= Y= y= 5 y= y= y= buration of Analvsis (hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 75.3 fi1".· / /r·\ nnr.llmp.nt~% ?Osmti% ?O~".ttino<;:\~m¡tthp.~ rTIN r\ T ,or.¡ 1% ?O~p.ttin o~\ TFMP\~?1c ~ 7 Q/?Q/?OO~ Full Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SA TURA TION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET General Information Project Description Sabin/Edwards Road - Pre with committed Volume Adjustment EB WB NB SB LT TH RT IT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 266 268 263 310 233 226 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ~dj. Flow Rate 280 282 277 326 245 238 I.ane Group TR L 1 L R "dj. flow rate 562 277 326 245 238 Prop. L T or RT 0.000 - 0.502 0.000 - 0.000 - - Saturation Flow Rate Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 0.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 ~g 1.000 1.000 p 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ~a 1.00 1.00 flU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 fLT 1.000 -- 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 - -- Secondary fL T - 0.256 - - - ~T - 0.932 - 1.000 - 0.850 -- fLpb 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 - - fRpb -- 1.000 - 1.000 -- 1.000 -- "dj. satflow 1687 1719 1810 1719 1538 !Sec. adj. satflow -- 463 - -- -- fitp·/lr·\nnt'lImpnh¡°1.. ?OAnti01.. 'O~pttinoc¡\c¡m$ltthpc: rTTNr\T .nc~$lI01.. ?O~pttinoc:\TFMP\c¡1k'i7 Q/?Q/?OO'i FuJI Report Page 3 of3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET ~enerallnfonnation Þroject Description Sabin/Edwards Road - Pre with committed Capacity Analysis EB WB NB SB ...ane group TR L T L R Adj. flow rate 562 277 326 245 238 Satflow rate 1687 1719 1810 1719 1538 ~ost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green ratio 0.45 0.65 0.65 0.22 0.22 ~ane group cap. 764 459 1171 379 339 vIe ratio 0.74 0.60 0.28 0.65 0.70 Flow ratio 0.33 0.18 0.14 0.15 Crit. lane group y N N N N Y N ¡Sum flow ratios 0.62 ...ost timeleycle 15.00 Critical vIe ratio 0.77 Lane GrOUD CaDacity, Control Delay. and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB ...ane group TR L T L R Adj. flow rate 562 277 326 245 238 I'-ane group cap. 764 459 1171 379 339 vIe ratio 0.74 0.60 0.28 0.65 0.70 Green ratio 0.45 0.65 0.65 0.22 0.22 Unif. delay d1 16.9 8.5 5.7 26.7 27.1 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Inerem. delay d2 6.2 5.8 0.6 8.3 11.5 ÞF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 23.1 14.3 6.3 34.9 38.6 ane group LOS C B A C D Apprch. delay 23.1 10.0- 36.7 ¡Approach LOS C A D Intersec. delay 22.3 Intersection LOS C HCS]'HJ'J™ Copyright e 2000 University of Florida. All Rights Reserved Version 4,1ç filp.·llr·\nnr.lImp.nh:°/n?O~nti°1n ?O~p.ttinøc;:\c;:m~tthpc;: rTfNr\ T ni"~ 10/" ?n~ptt1noC!\TJ<p"AP\C!,)1r "7 o/')o/'){){), Sabin/Edwards Road Development - Traffic Impact Study POST-DEVELOPMENT CAP ACITY ANALYSIS P:\Proj-200SIOS-I46 Traffic Impact ,Sobin' CompanieslReponslOS- J 46Tis,doc Page 18 FulJ Report Page 1 of3 Genera' Information ~nalyst Agency or Co. ' Date Performed Time Period skm St. Lucie County 9/29/05 PM Peak Hour FULL REPORT lSite Information Intersection ~rea Type ~urisdiction Analysis Year S. 25th St & Edwards Rd All other areas St. Lucie County 2006 ntersection Geometry Grade:: 0 1 2 1 )!l Grade:: 0 1 J 0 2 ~ ~ 2 0 r- 1 Grade:: 0 1 r Grade: 0 1 2 0 Volume and Timina InDut EB WB NB 58 LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume (vph) 186 366 79 214 424 261 122 572 94 280 791 186 % Heavv veh 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ctuated (PIA) P P P P P P P P P P P P tartup lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 xt. eff. areen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 \rrival type 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 nit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 PedlBikelRTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking (Y or N) N N N N N N N N IParkinglhr us stopslhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Excf. Left EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 'riming G= 7.5 G = 23.0 G= G= G= 5.0 G = 37.4 G- G= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Y= 5 Y= 5 Y= Y= Duration of Analysis {hrs = 0.25 Cycle Length C = 92.9 filp·¡¡r·\f)nrl1mpntQ0.l.. ?(\Anti0/." ?(\~ptt1nOQ\QmAtthpQ rTTNr'\ T nf'A 10/." ?(\~ptt1noQ\TJ<'MP\Q?1l"~ ~ Q/?Q/?(\()~ Full Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET General Information Project Description S8binÆdwards Road - Post with committed Volume Adjustment EB W8 NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 186 366 79 214 424 261 122 572 94 280 791 186 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 IAdj. Flow Rate 196 385 83 225 446 275 128 602 99 295 833 196 ¡Lane Group L TR L TR L TR L T R Adj. flow rate 196 468 225 721 128 701 295 833 196 Prop. L T or RT 0.000 - 0.177 0.000 - þ.381 0.000 -- 0.141 10·000 - 0.000 !Saturation Flow Rate aase satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 lNum. of lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 2 1 fW 1.000 1.000 1,000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 0.952 Þ.952 0.952 þ.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 ¡'g 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 P 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb t 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 'a 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 flU 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 fLT 0.950 1.000 - þ.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 - þ.950 1.000 -- Secondary fl T 0.143 -- 0.292 - 0.196 - 0.255 - fRT -- 0.973 - 0.943 - 0.979 - 1.000 0.850 fLpb 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- fRpb -- 1.000 - 1.000 - 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 ~dj. satflow 1719 3347 1719 3241 1719 3365 1719 3438 1538 Sec. adj. satflow 259 - 529 - 354 - 462 - fi1e~IIC~\nnr.1Imp.nt~°1n ?Osmtf0ln 'O~pttino~\c;:mMthpQ rTTNl"'\ T ,nf'SI1 O/,.. ?nc;;:.pttinoQ\ T¡:;'UP\c,)¡"'" o/')o/')()()c; FulJ Report Page 3 of3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET General Information Project Description Sabin/Edwards Road - Post with committed Capacity Analysis EB WB NB SB ane group L TR L TR L TR L T R ~dj. flow rate 196 468 225 721 128 701 295 833 196 Satflow rate 1719 13347 1719 3241 1719 3365 1719 3438 1538 ost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 !Green ratio 0.38 0.25 0.38 0.25 0.51 0.40 0.51 0.40 0.40 ,-ane group cap. 217 829 298 802 255 1355 304 1384 619 vIe ratio 0.90 0.56 0.76 0.90 0.50 0.52 0.97 0.60 0.32 Flow ratio 0.14 0.22 0.21 0.24 0.13 Crit. lane group N N N Y N N N N N Sum flow ratios 0.79 ~ost time/cycle 15.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.95 Lane Group Capacit 'I. Control Delav and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB ¡Lane group L TR L TR L TR L T R ~dj. flow rate 196 468 225 721 128 701 295 833 196 Lane group cap. 217 829 298 802 255 1355 304 1384 619 VIe ratio 0.90 0.56 0.76 0.90 0.50 0.52 0.97 0.60 0.32 IGreen ratio 0.38 0.25 0.38 0.25 0.51 0.40 0.51 0.40 0.40 Unif. delay d1 22.5 30.6 27.7 33.8 14.2 20.9 29.7 21.9 19.0 belay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 '40.2 2.8 16.2 15.0 6.9 1.4 44.6 1.9 1.3 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 [control delay 62.8 33.3 43,9 48.8 21.1 22.4 74.4 23.8 20.3 I.ane group LOS E C D D C C E C C Apprch. delay 42.0 47.7 22.2 34.6 Approach LOS D D C C Intersec. delay 36.4 Intersection LOS D HCS}(HHþTM Copyrighl Q 2000 UniversilY of florida. All Righls Reserved Version 4.lc fi1p' //r·\nnr.1Impnh::0In?O~nn01n ?O~pttinac:\c:m~tthP<.'! rTTNr\ T n('~ to/", "O~pttinnc:\TPf\,rP\c:,)Ir" ono/')oo, Full Report Page lof3 FULL REPORT General Information Site Information Analyst skm Intersection Edwards Rd & Sunrise Blvd Agency or Co. St. Lucie County Area Type All other areas Date Performed 9/29/05 !Jurisdiction St. Lucie County !Time Period PM Peak Hour ~nalysis Year 2006 ntersection Geometry Grade = 0 0 1 1 ~ l Grade = 0 1 -.J 0 2 --r 1- 2 0 r 1 Grade = 0 1 1 ( Grade = 0 1 1 1 Volume and Tlmina InDut EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT olume (vph) 73 496 99 28 623 68 92 94 21 68 182 120 % Heavv veh 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ctuated (PIA) P P P P P P P P P P P P tartuD lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 xt. eft. areen 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 ~rival tvoe 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 nit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 ÞedlBike/RTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ...ane Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking (Y or N) N N N N N N N N Parkinglhr ~us stopslhr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 3.2 Excl. Left EW Perm 03 04 Excl. Left NS Perm 07 08 Timing G = 7.3 G = 30.4 G= G= G= 5.7 G = 19.7 G= G= Y= 5 y= 5 y= Y= y= 5 y= 5 Y= Y= lDuration of Analysis (hrs =0.25 Cycle Lenath C = 83.1 fi Je://C:\Documents%20and%20Settinl!s\smatthe..<¡. CTIN C\LocaJ%20Settinl!s\ TEMP\s2k56... 9/29/2005 Full Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET General Information project Description Sabin/Edwards Road - Post development with committed Volume Adjustment EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume 73 496 99 28 623 68 92 94 21 68 182 120 IPHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0,95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow Rate 77 522 104 29 656 72 97 99 22 72 192 126 ...ane Group L TR L TR L T R L TR ~dj. flow rate 77 626 29 728 97 99 22 72 318 Þrop. L T or RT 0.000 - 0.166 kJ.OOO - 0.099 10.000 - þ.OOO 10.000 -- 10.396 Saturation Flow Rate Base satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 fW 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 ItHv 10.952 ~.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 0.952 9 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 P 1.000 1.000 1. 000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 a 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 n.U 1.00 0.95 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 LT 10.950 1.000 - 0.950 1.000 -- 0.950 1.000 - 10.950 1.000 - Secondary fl. T 0.224 - 0.276 - 0.255 - 0.553 -- ffiT -- 0.975 - 0.985 - 1.000 0.850 -- 0.941 n-Pb 1. 000 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 - 1.000 1.000 -- fRpb -- 1.000 -- 1.000 -- 1.000 1.000 -- 1.000 ~dj. satflow 1719 3352 1719 3387 1719 1810 1538 1719 1702 Sec. adj. satflow 405 -- 500 - 461 -- 1000 -- filp·/lr ·\nnl'nmpnt"O/.. ')()"n,fO/.. ')()~ptt;nnC'\C'n·\<.tth...C' (""TJl'l..f(",,\ r ",.'" 10/.. ")()~..tt~nnC'\ TP1'.AÐ\",,,)1r'¡;;¡; O/")O/")()()C; FulJ Report Page 3 of3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET General Information Project Description Sabin/Edwards Road - Post development with committed Capacity Analvsis EB WB NB SB L.ane group L TR L TR L T R L TR ~dj. flow rate 77 626 29 728 97 99 22 72 318 5atflow rate 1719 3352 1719 3387 1719 1810 1538 1719 1702 Lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 G-reen ratio 0.51 0.37 0.51 0.37 0.37 0.24 0.24 0.37 0.24 ,-ane group cap. 324 1226 364 1239 255 429 365 415 403 'vlc ratio 0.24 0.51 0.08 0.59 0.38 0.23 0.06 0.17 0.79 J:low ratio 0.19 0.21 0.05 0.01 0.19 Crit. lane group N N N Y N N N N Y Sum flow ratios 0.50 IL-ost timelcycle 20.00 Critical v/c ratio 0.66 ~ane Group Capacitv. Control Dela\/ and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB ane group L TR L TR L T R L TR ~dj. flow rate 77 626 29 728 97 99 22 72 318 IL-ane group cap. 324 1.226 364 1239 255 429 365 415 403 v/c ratio 0.24 0.51 0.08 0.59 0.38 0.23 0.06 0.17 0.79 Green ratio 0.51 0.37 0.51 0.37 0.37 0.24 0.24 0.37 0.24 Unif. delay d 1 11.7 20.5 10.9 21.3 18.9 25.6 24.5 17.6 29.8 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 1.7 1.5 0.4 2.0 4.3 1.3 0.3 0.9 14.5 PF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 13.4 22.1 11.3 23.3 23.2 26.8 24.9 18.5 44.2 ,-ane group LOS B C B C C C C B D pprch. delay 21.1 22.9 25.0 39.5 I\pproach LOS C C C D Intersec. delay 25.6 Intersection LOS C HCS2'H(JTM Copyright C 2000 University of Florida, All Rights Reserved Version 4.lc hi..· ",....\ n",..".............o/.. ,)f\"..,:O/.. ..,f\c....;..~"\~__H1._" ro.,...T.,. Trol r _~"10/ "/\C' _....:___1.,...1::'11 Inl _"..e..:: /\ ,,,n,,,nnc Full Report Page I of 3 FULL REPORT General Information lSite Information Analyst skm Intersection Edwards Rd & Selvitz Road Agency or Co. St. Lucie County Area Type All other areas Date Performed 9/29/05 Jurisdiction St. Lucie County Time Period PM Peak Hour Analysis Year 2006 ntersectlon Geometrv Grade = 0 0 0 Grade = 0 0 0 1 ~ ....- 1 0 r 1 Grade = 0 1 ( Grade = 0 1 0 1 Volume and Timing Input EB WB NB S8 LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT LT TH RT Volume (vph) 280 268 266 318 233 230 % Heavy veh 5 5 5 5 5 5 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 ctuated (PIA) P P P P P P tartuD lost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 xt. eff. green 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 rrival tYDe 3 3 3 3 3 nit Extension 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Ped/BikelRTOR Volume 0 0 0 0 0 I..sne Width 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 12.0 Parking (Y or N) N N N N N N N N Þarking/hr Bus stopslhr 0 0 0 0 0 Ped timing 3.2 3.2 3.2 we Only EW Perm 03 04 NB Only 06 07 08 iming G= 5.0 G = 34.9 G= G= G = 15.5 G= G= G= ¥= 5 ¥= 5 ¥= ¥= ¥= 5 y= y= ¥= Duration of Analysis (hrs =0.25 Cycle Length C = 70.4 hlp·llr·\ nnt'lImpntc>O/.. ?n!:tntfo/.. ?n(;:ptttn oc>\c>m !:t tth Pc> rTINt"'\ T nt'!:t 10/.. ?nC;;:ptttnoc>\TPMPh:?1t-4\7 QI?Q/?OO~ FuJI Report Page 2 of 3 VOLUME ADJUSTMENT AND SATURATION FLOW RATE WORKSHEET General Information Project Description Sabin/Edwards Road - Post development with committed Volume Adjustment EB WB NB SB LT TH RT LT TH RT IT TH RT LT TH RT Ivolume 280 268 266 318 233 230 PHF 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 0.95 Adj. Flow Rate 295 282 280 335 245 242 ane Group TR L T L R Adj. flow rate 577 280 335 245 242 Prop. l T or RT 0.000 -- 0.489 0.000 -- þ.OOO - - Saturation Flow Rate lease satflow 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Num. of lanes 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 Jw 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fHV 0.952 0.952 0.952 kJ.952 0.952 "9 1.000 1.000 P 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fbb 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 fa 1.00 1.00 flU 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 flT 1.000 -- 0.950 1.000 - 0.950 - - Secondary fl T - 0.277 - - -- ~T -- '0.934 - 1.000 -- þ.850 - flpb 1.000 - 1.000 1,000 -- 1.000 - -- fRpb - 1.000 -- 1.000 - 1.000 - !Adj. satflow 1690 1719 1810 1719 1538 Isec. adj. satflow - 502 -- - -- r.1..·l/r·\ n"",,-......t..O/.. ")I\.....AO/.. ")()~ ..tt;...~..\..-...tt....,." r',..T1I.Tr"\ T ...",..10/.. ")()~ ..,.tt;... "',,\ "'C~AD\..')¡,C'7 0/") 0/") ()()C Full Report Page 3 of3 CAPACITY AND LOS WORKSHEET General Information Project Description Sabin/Edwards Road - Post development with committed CaDacity Analysis EB WB NB SB Lane group TR L T L R !Adj. flow rate 577 280 335 245 242 fsatflow rate 1690 1719 1810 1719 1538 ~ost time 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.0 Green ratio 0.50 0.64 0.64 0.22 0.22 Lane group cap. 838 407 1154 378 339 v/c ratio 0.69 0.69 0.29 0.65 0.71 Flow ratio 0.34 0.19 0.14 0.16 Crit. lane group y N N N N Y N Sum flow ratios 0.57 Lost time/cycle 15.00 Critical vlc ratio 0.72 Lane GrouD CaDacity. Control Delav. and LOS Determination EB WB NB SB ILane group TR L T L R ~dj. flow rate 577 280 335 245 242 Lane group cap. 838 407 1154 378 339 tv/c ratio 0.69 0.69 0.29 0.65 0.71 !Green ratio 0.50 0.64 0.64 0.22 0.22 Unif. delay d1 13.6 8.0 5.7 25.0 25.4 Delay factor k 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 0.50 Increm. delay d2 4.6 9.2 0.6 8.3 12.1 ÞF factor 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 Control delay 18.2 17.2 6.3 33.3 37.5 Lane group LOS B B A C D Apprch. delay 18.2 11.2 35.4 lÄpproach LOS B B D Intersec. delay 20.6 Intersection LOS C HCS}((Jf¡TM Copyrighl ~ 2000 Universily of Florida, All Righls Reserved Version 4,1 c fi1~·I/r.·\nn~lImPl1to;:o;", ?O,:¡nA0;'" "O~pttinao;:\~m !;atthp~ r'TT'II..Tr\ T "'"'' 10/" ")O~..tt;nn"\T~AAJ>\,,,)1r ,,7 0/,)0/,,)00, Sabin/Edwards Road Development - Traffic Impact Study OTHER TRAFFIC STUDIES P=lProj,200SIOS-I46 Trallic Impact -Sabin ComponicsIReponsIOS-I46Tis,doc Page 19 TABLE 1 FRONTERA TRIP GENERATION 1.-1 VIe laCallty Ddy AM Pat Hoar PM Peak Hour TrIM TucaI III Oat TDIaI .. Out ~SI"'T..Ir... SiqIe Family 147 d.u. 1.42 112 28 ... IS2 96 S6 Multi Fllllily 200 d.u. I.3S2 102 20 82 128 83 ",S Nit NftI &t".,..¡ ~ z,'J4 214 41 1" 211 1." 101 NøIie: Trip JeDrßlÌoa was calculaled asiDe Ibe foUowiøc daIII: Dmly T..fIic Geaeracioa SiacIe Family (lYE 210] - La(T) - 0.92l.a(X) + 2.71 M1II1i PImiIy (lYE 220) .. T-6.01(X) + 150.3.5 AM Pelt Hour T..fJC Geacntioa SiDp FllaUy (lYE 210] - T - 0.7O(X) + 9.43; (2.5" ill, 75..) Multi FlllliJy (lYE 220] .. T - 0.49(X) + 3.73; <20" ill, I09Io oat) PM Pat Hour TnfIic GeaInIioa SiJIIIe Fllllily (lYE 210) .. La(T) '" 0.90 l.a(X) + 0..53; (63" ill. 37.. out) Maki Fullily (1TE 220) '" T-O.SS(X) + 17.65; (65. ÍII, ""GIlt) I il II I I I I J --..,.... I -- œ~~k ..1.--...---..... , I , I I I , ~ " ~ ~ ø I I I I I I I ~ .. I§j ~ I. ~ ~ ~ ~1.~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~I.1-1. 1.1.1.1- II :I I. I. >- >- iI' ~s. ~~. ¡il5·~~ ~s !~~! ~! !~!! - s ~i. ~ :! " lit ;:; 2:::_~~= ~ò ... .. .. - . ... f-.-- !" o ¡:¡ :: :a IS !!¡:¡!~~c:; ag a~E!ia a~o:a :: ~ ~ ::r 'j ! ~ "#. " " ~~I~~~ c ~ """1111" ~ ~ ~ ~ " "#. ! ! . ... - :¡:l:ll ~R . - II ~~ ~~q .~ ~ ~~ . I" ¡i·~~5 ;::!~~ ~~ ::I !: :;(::1 r:.~ :J ~ " lit ;:; 2QQ=~= IU2""_ ~ ...... .. 2 ç :oil ¡IJ ~ ~ ~~~ -!!~~~ !! ~~~~..~ !!!! -- ~~ =ï=ï t , , :!_-:II:II:! :II:II:II:¡:/JI .,:.:.:,,: :! ~ s:I ~ JJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I'i Å I'i ~ ~ ~ RI'i ~~~~~~ ÅRÅÅ R R ~ ~ J! o 0 000 o!!!!S;!o o 0 Oi!3!~1 000 0 o i! o 0 "ill II ¡ ¡ ~ ~ R ~! !!! ! !~ rn=:t:t:~ E~!a :! ~ ::I !: - · "1 ""! ct""1 "1 "1 ~ ""1"1 .,¡..'" -.., - .... 1Ir\_ ... - .. - ¡: i e 8 sse II - e ~je~ JS § § ! ~ ~ ~~~!!~ ~ ~ "#."#."#.~~- ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ I ~ ~; :I! S~ ... ... ~:¡:t;¡~~ -.,,¡.:. .......... ..: .., ... ..; t;;~ € 8 & Q II .. S5~ ! - - ~~ ~ !! ~I~ ~ ~~ ~~"I. ~~ .~ !:! ~ ·~S:!2- ~ .., "'" 1"'1 .. .. .. .. ... ... I[j ~~ ftftft !!~...... !! ~~.. -!! ! ! ! ! -~ ~~ Ju :¡ ::¡ ~ ~ ~ - - ~ :;::c: ~ :¡:¡:¡:!_- -'0\':'; ! ~ ; ; ~ ~ ~~~ RÅ~~~~ R Å ~~~RRÅ R ;::I ;::I ;:l ;::1;::1 ~ ~ 111 !JJ!l! ! ~ j! J ! J ~ {!. I ~jJ j&~JJ! jJ iJ! i Ii J,¡ -< 1 i ~ oJ I -< i Jii Hs'i'1 !!Jld 11! idJiJfHilHtU f I IHi HJH!liI¡BJi U!ì,UHfUIH Jf II ~ II ~ J i 1 I j 1 1 ..ij :1~f·11 ... -II i ~ I \-_- ! i~lfi 1 i 4 ¡tfi! ·1~11 tuu iflrl lIlli' tjJIII ~ ~:@:@ ----- J~I::i::l~'<!. ~ lšj ~ ~ Ilf s= d' Ij J. .' .IJ II I. JI II II ud Is S IJ ¡lip> 'i[fl JI Jl ~~ :~ a ~¡ s:¡ ~ ~~ N~ H ~!.~ ~~~/.~/. '"~ ~!./.~/.~ ~/.!./. ¡~- e: ..;S~ i¡i::E~ ~Hj ~Š3Š~5 ~æ!!5 o:! """H .:=:~~:!-- :~ :;~; ~ ~~ ::~O'" ~ ~ t!!: ~ ~!:,~~~ ~~ --- ~".- :Q~:;::i!~~ !~gt ~! !! sa !§~ ~;l;l5giè Ã! ~~~!!! !;;!!i! ¡;;¡ 5~ !52 000 ..; ~ 555 II~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~ ~~~~ !! ~! ~~ ~~~ ;;!ldld~~~ Idld ~~~~~~ ¡;lid;;!;;! Idld ~~ 00 000 o~~;I\!:o 00 O"=S!!e 0000 0.... 00 e:e: !!~a ª~~a:!E .... 1ò~I:õR!ì," 2:::..~ ~Ii i~ i: £ : II :£:8 _ ~~ ~!! I~t!!~ ..~:I~:1~ !~ S~~!!! ~!!! ~~ !! II II II -QJ::: iè!è 5~3 ~~aS~2! æ; ~!~~~5 ~~ijE ~~ ~! ti8°00 ~:! 555 II ~ ~~ ~ ~Hì ~~~III ~~!~ II ~! ~~ ~~~ ¡;I;;!~~~~ Idid ~~~Id¡;/id ¡;IldRId IdR ~~ J'I!! 1JJj!! j! ~Jj 1 J JIii. ,¡ Jiif..; -I .. ; lie; It r. 1 ~I~ f!~j~; j~ IJill Ii ¡i I :t i ;:t .,¡ '¡ ~ ] J J j J IJ 1 i i ~j i J I i J..;~I'J!J]]jJ!¡¡ J!I '~]jJIp><]! <JSiBiB f IIHi dlHullpJli fJ,i,HH,UJii II J J I I ! I 1 ~ :laf1a ... .. a I ....1 ! i=-'fi Ii' f IIi·l ·I¡IJ fif~f !~fff J t 11 ¡IIII f fillll ð~~~~ - - _ _!"'o. ii:::t!.~~~ :f . Sabin/Edwards Road Development - Traffic Impact Study BACK-UP TRAFFIC DATA Page 20 P:\Pmj-200SI05-146 Traffic IIIIpICt -Sobin Companies\ReporuIOS-I46Tis,doc 05-146 Saban Selvitz and Edwards rouDS not - ns I From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds Right I Thru Left Peds Right Thru Left I Peds Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 I 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 I 1.0 04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 63 65 0 63 0 60 0 51 59 0 0 04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 69 58 0 46 0 51 0 SO 67 0 0 Total 0 0 0 0 0 132 123 0 109 0 111 0 101 126 0 0 G p. ed U h"fted Fife Name : untitlE Site Code : OOOO( Start Date : 09/27 Page No : 1 05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 85 61 0 SO 0 60 0 88 65 0 0 05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 79 79 0 67 0 62 0 79 66 0 0 05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 70 64 0 31 0 38 0 43 70 0 0 05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 70 34 0 47 0 31 0 31 52 0 0 T ota! 0 0 0 0 0 304 238 0 195 0 191 0 241 253 0 0 06:00 PM 0 0 0 JI 0 59 37 0 40 0 39 0 33 64 0 0 06:15 PM 0 0 0 0 58 28 0 42 0 33 0 42 36 0 0 Grand Total 0 0 0 0 553 426 0 386 0 374 0 417 479 0 0 Apprch% 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 56.5 43.5 0.0 SO.8 0.0 49.2 0.0 46.5 53.5 0.0 0.0 Total % 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 21.0 16.2 0.0 14.6 0.0 14.2 0.0 15.8 18.2 0.0 0.0 P cf4!!. H 0tN'L :: Y:30-5~30 kJB~: 2.2-b Nß L ': l33 I=~ Q.. ~ ZbB e--8í - l5=1- - wBL: 2-'3 tV 16"'" ~ l q, 05-146 Saban Sunrise and Edwards File Name : untitlE Site Code : OOOO( Start Date : 09/27 Page No : 1 GrouDS Printed- Unshifted From North From East From South From West Start Time Right Thru left Peds Right Ttvu left Peds Right Thru left Peds Right Thru left I Peds Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 , 1.0 r 04:30 PM 21 37 20 0 15 123 9 0 1 31 19 0 22 105 17 0 04:45 PM 15 19 14 0 20 125 7 0 2 18 23 0 23 127 17 0 ¿: T~ 36 56 34 0 35 248 16 0 3 49 42 0 45 232 34 0 05:00 PM 30 60 20 0 20 167 5 0 6 21 21 0 17 110 10 0 05:15 PM 35 57 20 0 13 160 11 0 3 26 23 0 29 123 16 0 05:30 PM 20 46 14 0 15 148 5 0 10 29 14 0 20 115 11 0 05:45 PM 20 29 15 0 11 126 6 0 3 19 13 0 20 107 21 0 Total 105 192 69 0 59 601 27 0 22 95 71 0 86 455 58 0 06:00 PM 8 17 12 0 13 90 3 0 1 15 15 0 9 83 12 0 06:15 PM 18 24 13 0 19 102 7 0 4 16 19 0 9 76 16 0 Grand Total 167 289 128 0 126 1041 53 0 30 175 147 0 149 846 120 0 Apprch ok 28.6 49.5 21.9 0.0 10.3 85.3 4.3 0.0 8.5 49.7 41.8 0.0 13.4 75.9 10.8 0.0 Total % 5.1 8.8 3.9 0.0 3.9 31.8 1.6 0.0 0.9 5.4 4.5 0.0 4.6 25.9 3.7 0.0 'f~K Hout - Y;~~-5:46' - 5 ß fl.. - 100 - SB í = IßL S8L- - "8 - N ~d2... -= 2.1 N ßí :- q~ NßL - 81 - Ë"8 u.. ~ Bq éß í ': 11 :r5 ë-b L ::: 6&.1 WA~: 68 IN ~ -r :.. boo c.vBL.: 2.8 ~i .;, '::'~)'¡ "~-."" ~.: .t.... ~ t -~ft /r .. ., '-!'"'" ""U_LL.. I' _ i.25th iStreet and EdwaFds:1Röad . - ;-.. ~ l::" ," .·4-2:7~4.:··. "' "'j . ... .- .. .... File Name : 03-064;-Tr Site Code :00000001 Start Date : 04/27/20C Page No : 1 :. : ~ ,- Grouos Printed· Unshifted Southbound Westbound Northbound Eastbound Start Time Right Ttvu Left Peels Right Thru left Peds Right TIvu Left Peds Right Thru Left Peds II TOI Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 04:00 PM 37 144 83 0 84 70 22 0 29 133 26 0 24 92 32 0 7: 04:15 PM 34 132 63 0 51 70 41 0 26 133 27 0 18 83 33 0 7' 04:30 PM 31 121 72 0 53 71 31 0 14 106 11 0 17 70 49 0 6- 04:45 PM 32 156 61 0 53 71 38 0 22 98 23 0 13 71 36 0 6; Total 134 553 279 0 241 282 132 0 91 470 87 0 72 316 150 0 28( 05:00 PM 48 182 67 0 52 110 55 0 18 124 34 0 15 86 27 0 81 05:15 PM 38 188 71 0 59 77 50 0 18 147 21 0 24 83 43 0 81 05:30 PM 18 151 55 0 73 78 29 0 13 124 23 0 13 74 45 0 6' 05:45 PM 23 118 51 0 36 63 32 0 10 116 26 0 14 79 25 0 5' Total 127 639 244 0 220 328 186 0 59 511 104 0 86 322 140 0 29~ Grand Total 261 1192 523 0·~1 461 610 298 0·~1 150 981 191 o.~ I 138 638 290 o·gl sn Apprch % 13.2 60.3 26.5 33.7 44.6 21.8 11.3 74.2 14.4 12.9 59.8 27.2 Total % 4.6 20.8 9.1 0.0 8.0 10.6 5.2 0.0 2.6 17.1 3.3 0.0 2.4 11.1 5.1 0.0 ::! ~ ~ ~ .!JI ~ t.J C t.J C ~ ~ ~ ~ ..9 ¡¡: ¡¡: .... ¡¡: } ] I ¡¡ r !;. j .s .s .š ~ ~ õi õi ] ~ J Þ<: tr. J Ii ~ þ f ~ ~ þ g ;;> ;>, i:i' ~ ;>, ~ .. ," '"~ ~ ~ ¡., ¡., ~ :$ ~ ~ ~ "?ì þ b b b b b b u U ~ ~ ~ t. :. :. t.J !5 Is l- I- I- I- 13 u u M j ~ M 1;' "¡¡> Ii Ii l ~ ~ '" '" '" "'''' ." <:> <:> .... 'j ð I j ~" , .€ .' ~ , J J t iii , ::I ~ . 0 to z '" '" OJ J ! J t> ! > ~~ 0 ~ ~ ãj u '" '" '" .~ u ::I " .. iii iii .., iii -= - ~ ~ ~ ~ .:; '" '" ~ < .... '" .... .... < < , . I 'i ¡ Iii '01 t.J ' 1 t.J1t.J t.J t.J:t.JIt.J t.J a:I¡a:I,a:I a:lia:l a:Ia:I a:lja:l,O a:I¡a:I .a:I......,.:.I"a:I....i,·..,..tl..........fi.o..... Vt.JjO t.J t.J ~t¡'~' ªlª¡ª:¡:~~~tª!,:ª §j§~i& ~"~II~~ ~'I~ 8'8ì8,8'8 '~." '~.",~. "~.1.',.'§r.!~. ~il;~' '~.'-' ~ ~ I -....~.!~I,·~I~I,~ ~..,r-: ....¡!~!Ñ, o"¡.¿¡r: ~.,.; "";110 f',Lv)'¡r-r 0:. r-:-.., .---, r"'1 0 OC.! f"') I I· I I . I· II _:.1.".....,;.:'.' ll' I:,'....' -!..... :..::'.,' ,:,1. ,:1.,1 ~~n~~8~. . :¡~¡~t:k :'j~J. :t: ~§t.!.r. . §j~8t8tHt8 .¡...: ~¡v)~¡~¡:; :iioó!r-:j~¡~ 212 ~!;¡~ ;¡2 ~i=i~2!~ ~ ro-;I-: ~¡~¡o' oó¡~ I I I ,¡ 1 I I :. I I ¡ ì 'i ¡ rr'r~ .L; . j ~I~ ~j T t 'I ,¡"'i-, I i ¡ I ii, i ! I I i 9 9!1'~:~ ~¡II~ :¡I:~:jçtl~ ·9=.¡~¡.':lt~t"'9UI;dç i ~ì~¡iL. .9"'11.9" ; Ii Ii " Ii iii Ii! -{pd.: Ia':i '1iI1" ¡' I' Ii": iii ~:i IS.: åJ '!:ii ' .h ~ ~IJ!!I~ ~:~ .... ~ ~I~I~ ~,'::(.~I~ì~ ~i.~ ~I~.'.~ .(l~ <'<I~~'< ~ ~I~ ...1"';' ob'.. ~~ ob....:. ...:.,~..:.. ....:.j~j....:. 0..10. ò-iô- .1ò-jd, tAl... "'. ' ~ oÒl'''¡' ...;.... -;.... 0;0 "',0 o;o¡o ",:on-:- -j-n-,.... 0:- .:'~!~i:!¡~ ... - - ,¡ I ~r~t8lg 2:2 2+12T8W¿ 8Tgfïit818 812ITgfR8 ."tg -·t""TgtO+g - .. 8'87"8 'T ;,:: ;,:: ",.", ;:¡¡¡;:¡¡ (S ~ _'....1'" '" "'.;:¡¡._..... _.(S '" ....- ~ì~ ~'&¡"l,I,~i'": ~ & ~ '":1",.1-0: ~¡~ §I:I:¡; ~; ;¡;I;¡;'; ;,l;,¡~; :::': ,. :,1: ;¡.;;¡;t~l; ;; ;;1;;; ;, ....,:":":1": ..:1.,;- .,;-/"";-''';-1'';-'';- .'';i.'.II.¡. .J..';i....;.. .'.1";1";1";";";";- ";-10:-1.,;-.,;-1.,;- "',- -1- ...., I '" I'" "','" "'¡'" "'I - '" '" "',"'¡- -1- - -.... J I ¡ .. '+j+,!m 1 ~ 1.' I ; ¡ ¡tl.! ·;llli,t",,!, '!~t· 'i' ,I""" ""I':' '!' '1"" ,I, 'I"~NI' ,- ",,1, "I" 1 rx¡i§'¡' ! ' ¡ I I' : 1 ; ;; _I' ,,,,' _I i~ ' ; ¡~ 31 ! I ~¡~ u "',"'! I· :~,; ~ ~I_ .....lãj..>:I¡~~,,:.:~,,_ 1- J~¡~ ::tì"O : ~j<¡ ~ > ':::..2:i u u1 ~ u H ~'~"Ø OJ ~ : _"'!';:; Qj =' U -5~ v;,v;'~IJ!IÕ Õ'O >i>¡~ ::;; < ....,"-,~ 1-'''- 2 ::>::> ;1: ~.~ ~,~!~!~~ ~i:~:I: :t:,~I:J: ~r ~µ+~ ~p" ~ " :s-i"'¡"'.... "'¡-Io-I"'I'" -,-/R¡,....,.... "'1'" -i-I.... 01", 8 ::::Ir ~¡~ ]:eel: j~et¡8 ~J~Cj~,- ~t ~¡~!~y:i~ ~t i_!... _1- ...;VJjCI'J r/JI'" ~¡~¡¡€ ~I~ ,....;_1_ N!N ~¡~J'õ ~I~ u.i:u.iiu.i u.il~ I ~¡~!:2 ~ ~ .li u u;u u ~ u u =j=,=lululu u u¡u¡Oi~iu 0i~,o Ujlulu 0 ~ 8t812'tMI18'~ 8 ¿T8igi¿lg''¿!¿ ¿8+g 8 ~ ~¡~,~!~ ~ ~ ~ r-!-Ci~¡tr)¡O ~,V\:~ Nlrr¡-.o ~ r: N'N' Ñ .,-)}"¡j-7!-11-= . !~; r: r---~¡"¡ I ,-, i ¡ ¡ ! !, ' §¡g'gT~§ ~g~t8r§Tgrgglgg ~!2:~!;!~ ~ ~ ~¡~i~[~¡~ ~!2'~ f "j "r~ ~w¡j ",.;,w",j", wI' I ¡ '''' ~ ,! .4d. ~ ~:~ ~ ~ ~¡J.tt.. .[1.1. ji~~ .. ~[~ 1 ~!~,~¡~I~ ~ ~ ~~~~: :;"[é ~ ~l" ::1::,,;1"1" " · 01 ::'0 8'~To 8 0'80 -Õ 6 g 2t8-g+~~ ,~ : :1:;:i:l: ;::;'~I~ ~ ~I;; :;: 8 8 00 q¡"!'-:'~Iq ~ ") ~ "!Iql-:i-: ":1'" ~ -¡"'I'" ,oÖ .,; -ë .,; a-!~,~¡= ~ · '" ..,¡a-/~¡~I" ::!:;;:.';'::!: gfgjg ~~r~.'~ ~"~ ~~i~¡~¡~¡¡~'~ ~ ~1~¡~T~j~~i~, ;¡;I;; '" .,. ... a- - a- .i.'~'''' .., .., . a- ..,I.."""a- ..,1..".., j. J" ~ ~ ~ ~i~,.:I - "Iil T- +.,L.t-'~-rwj i-t+~ i I ! I I i ."1.,, I :~ ~;.2: j ¡-I.....It:e ." ~ ]I]¡~:,"gl'g ~ ~ ~Iåi>'~i~ ~ ",g g:.~: 5i 1: = 2 ~,<¡tf;ø..I,e ; ; ;'~I~,~!~ U:L¡.,!OO i ~;~f§ :oÓ!""'¡ , '1- ¿:88 -¡ClIO ~ -1- '" f~~ '1.,.)~ 8T§8§§8 ~!~ ~ v) -6 ~ , '''' ..., > ClIã5 :ª¡.~ > .~j ,>- Er 'Øi~ æ::?;¡æ Io-!c-!,,- 0; ~o z,z¡z ''IT- ",¡ .....I'a- 0;0 0 ,..-¡ic-r')I"'-¡ . ¡ ¡ ." ." > > ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ ~ " ~:1 ... ü .., ü " 0 " ¡¡¡,= :; " '" -J vi ~ 0 ..J cñ cñ .~:·C '" cñ 5 §' I: 5 ~ ,::I '" '" '" ~~ ::> '" '" ... ... '- '- 0 0 0 0 w u!j~ w i ~ 1 Jf!~IJi~ ~ ~¡õ:l;ql~ "'"" <.-{c... :<0..0, '-I.... ~;l;i~t¥ 8 è!S ..,1...:00101. '" - ~I.:llï ~~ .., .....ig'",I..... ;;; 21-:;;;:;;:; tJJ , ) '" ª!ª ~ 0 ;;; .., õ .........-... ~ .. ~ .. .. C; C; C; ~ ~ ~ ~ ¡¡: 0 0 ¡¡ ¡¡: ¡¡: ¡¡: ] u 8 .... oÖ 88 "'. '" '" ç ~ ~ ~ 00 88 "'. 8ª c'a' i ~J .2:1 =, , .~¡"O¡ j!æl ci)1 g; ~!~¡~ '-,...,- o o:~ ~i~~ š ~ ~ !J " ~~ '- '- o 0 vim I , ..I~i,'" - if- r- '0 O¡~¡V'I I : LL ~;:; ~ C; ~ o ¡¡: .. .. .. C; ~ ¡¡: I j ." ~ '6 ~ ~ >.' '" o U ~ IS I- ~j ~ '" þ ~ u ]. U ,~ ~ ]] þ ð ~ - ~ uu ,~ ,~ ~~ ]] § § o 0 s¿s¿ Uu IS IS .. .. ~~ '" <= <= . r7i ·f ;:! ;:! ~ ;:! I tí ~ "- ~ ~ ;:! ~ -s ~ ~ a ." ~ ië « «~o ~ « ." u '" ... ~ ië '" u ;;au ~ Jl > « 0 cñ j jj] .!! ~j ~j « wä;: ~ :g i Ë - .!!! ~ I ¡¡ Ü u~ ~ ::¡ .. ~ = = ~ ~I.L.~ <:;) <:;) <:;) :1' II) => => N I I ï , ,,- .ç c' · , · ~ .. E · .. po Wlo W W;W ~I'~ ~ :1;t:);.:I; ~ ..: ~ ~¡::;r~I:;; '¡~ ¡¡I ~1~~~T~ 8 ~.~ ~o-~lt8o' ~ ~~1~;~ ~'8 ~J~ Ñ "'¡i~ r-: -é¡DÓ -¡N ~ ~i~¡;!~'~f~ ¡ ¡! . ~Ii :g +¡;;,:!;lOöt~';o t _ ~ f ~I ¡DOl ¡\O( ¡ I ¡ , ¡ .. +- --,Jil-~ ~II~ ~ ~;9 ~ O~~ ~ 9,1~ ~ ~'~¡~i~,~'~ .. .. .. "" ~.. Ia; lalla! la, ¡¡1'£ '7h ~ «¡ oÒ J;li ¿ ~,~'~:~;'7;":- 010 N ~¡~ OC) 00 .,.., "" ¿, OC) OC¡O" 0 - 00 -- N! -1- Nr~ ~ N!N¡N¡~i~l- g18 8 818§8T8 §i§ § §T8r8i~'8T8 ~I~ ~ :;¡::¡ ,.: :¿1~ ~I:<f .,: ~i~l;i::i'~? ~I~ ~ ~;~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~'~I~:~:~~~ ::)~ 0"> 0-.;0"< 0'1 Ø\ 0-. ÑÑ ~ ~'~1~!~'~ ~ . ¡ . f ¡ . - ~ NIN NIN M N!M ""1" M,M¡NIN N!M ~¡, ---1"'-- ..ø,~_L-_ t---~ -- .+.- ; ¡ : w10!w!w¡"" W W i'~f~h~!Iª ~. § 8t rf 8 8 ~i;.:Jt~l~i~ .,.; ~ ;;¡::;: Ñ ~ '¡ I ,- : ] ?;> 8 >¿ ¡:,. e "~ ¿ >, ~ it I- .. 11 Vi w!olo,o 01010 4,·LtJ·l¡ 81·:;:·.8J~I~'.~,·8 ",,:q.!"1i~ t¡~¡-;' """':'1 '7! ':'1 1'7; i !! 1 i 8jf;f¡8~~¡ 8t~8 2;¡~I~ ~pl; . , 1 j . "T"i¡;¡¡-+~ . "1~T , I"'; I:: I' ". i I . , :1:, ,J¡ -f-lid, ~ ~,~,~~191~ ~'~¡~~:9 (; :s :si:S1:S 0 :s:si~I:sI:s¡:s!:s ~!~¡~i~~~~ ~!~i~I~¡~ ~ ~ ~I~I~ ~ ~I~¡~I~I~¡~¡~ 8ré8t8¡8~~8 §-8!·8ig~§ g g gt~8 ~ 8'~¡é~~§·~ :!~ ~i:;¡:;:1~¡~ .,~,r-~~~;. ~ ~ '..'. . ·¡···'·I·'." , i, I r--:::)j~:"'_ ~:V>;;:: ..... ~i~¡:;¡;i~¡~;::) ~!~ ~¡ª ª;ª ª ~.~:~~:~ ~ ª ª;ª'ª ª ~¡ ~ ~,~ ~lo\ o';~ ~ ~ M'r<"Î~¡""; M d ~'O: 0\ 0\ rr)1 ..,) t<"Í ~1 -;- -, ! - -¡- -:- - ¡ - ;-¡;-,-- ~, ¡ -I " ¡' . --......: -, I, . i 1 ! I' , ! I ¡ .....¡..... .....¡.....'.....:.....,..... ..... .....'.....:.....,..... .....;.....,..... ..... ..... .....,.....1..... .....1............. +t-: : ,--H-t+· l+- - -i-+-H ,II ,,! 1 : _II !.!; I! i r.! I ~ ., . , , ¡Ji c'~ ~i~ ~~'ð ~j~~¡ : .g '0 15' . ~ ~i,o,,o!~i~i,oi~ ... ~ ¡~'.. g .!'! :J:, g¡J EI . .c '" 'g 1"';""1/1·1/1"".. j:8 ~L~ j¡~ ~ J.i~¡ë~!~j~ ~ ~ êOI!i~O.¡,.I~~ ~ ~1¡j!jl~I~¡~8 ~I'õ 'õl'õ 'õl'õ 'õ 'õ~ OJ 0 'õ! 0 ~ 0 'õ 0 'õ!'-""I'õ ,",¡c-î~ -' " I' ·:>:b .1:>: . "".'1."". .,'."" ~I.¡ 01' - o¡ 0, . !~ßI:iI;;; :i :i :i ~.2 ~ </Ó ?:. ;>+_;> </Ó '" :Z!</Ó :z </Ólv.i~ §1§II~lõ!~¡~I~ ~,~¡~I§¡~ ~ ~ =¡~iE ~ $I~!§~ ~I~!~ §Iê LT~n- IIi t .JL YII","l1 j I I I I '0 '" o :§ .s , ¡ ! : ;o,iO:;!'1m ~I~!~!~i§ ~ :¡:; .. .. .. Ci ~ ¡:;: J ::¡ .. Ci ~ ¡:;: a¡ J oS ~ ~ ~ ~ '" ,,« .. 0 J! .S ] ._ j.s¿j m_+! ...... g 8'8:8 ~ ~ "¡¡vi¡~ Ñ a Ci ~ ¡:;: I .s ]j g ~ ~~ (.¡ it Is I- ~j ~ :z >, ~~ ¡¡t ~ ~ ~¡~ -~ ~Ií~ ~ ~ '" i m.j ....._+ 8;8 8 8;8 ~¡~ -:.. ...cr~ ~¡~ N Ni I I I I 1'0 ''''0 I> C J> !ã5 -s ¡iii .c ~:i -s1'11 t ~¡'g ] > " i!/.3 ;;1 0 '" Ci..J "'- ¡¡ ,g!r/j jl~ -'" '" '" "'115 ;¡; ::> ;¡,r ::> ::>.... oS ... 'õ¡'õ ... 'õj~ ...... ... 0 0 o 0 0 ~ c11:i ~ u,j,~ ~ :i ~ i ~ ~~ 8 ~¡r-- '" :::! ......... .... _1::2 :::! I .-. .. .. .. Ci it o ¡:;: a¡ 15. ¡¡ .š J ... .. '" '6 ~ .!! J! '" ~ >, it :J: .. .. .S ~ '0 ~~ II ] ~~ šš "'''' ?;> ~ ~ uu . i- ce .~~ ¿ ¿ .. > C « .!! ! Iii ...J ::;: .. .. .. Ci ~ o ¡¡: ]] ?;> ~ g ~ð ee 5 :s . ".. ¿ ¿ ] ?;> ~ ~ e .~ ¿ ~ .~ ~ C" 6 6 ~ ~ 1-1- ! Ë "'''' '0 '" ! ~ ~~ ~~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ',",: ¡ ! Q!j ~!"O:;i ¡~¡ < ~¡ 5 -0:51 t;""¡""""W' ].~;i~!j¡~ 0,"'1.....,"',0,-'- 'õ;~!'õ¡1;:'õf~ ~:~I~!~!~!~ ~r~þr~I~~ w~.~~,_. ~.__..i...,,_-=_, ---t-.- I J 1 ¡~ 10 ¡¡:;: ;a¡ I~ I~ I] ~ I: If> 1~ IE .'" ~!~~~I~j~·¡·~ ~j·~~·~·i·~·¡·~·i~j;·:¡;¡·;I;i.: ~¡~!~I~¡~i~ ~""'lí~:~¡«"'!j~!~¡q¡r-:~1'"'i;"l ,,; . . ;11;;i~~ilii~;i; I '~Ñ! ¡ 'Ñ'Ñ"¡¡ :ut¡:r: ~!.i.¡. !~¡.;. .L ~!~!~I~lîJ9 ~ 111~:1.i~I~¡;i.~I~ ~!.I;I; ::E'::EI::EI::EI<:< ~ ~ ,- -- ;f;¡;t;'; ;'~~~j;I;~t~¡ Ii, g'g;gl~g1g'g g g:g'gfg8!g'g OCI 00;00 oc- - N ,..... r--- ,..... r- ,.....¡oo 00 ~~,~~~~~~,~~ ~~~~t·~~ - -1-1'-: - -¡- N N!~,~ ~:~! _ ,I I ; ,I !; j t I: " 1 J I ! N!NiNN!NiN N¡N¡N:.¡~j.¡.~~¡. - !t+µ. -+f'--Ti--t-~-! i ¡ ! í i I , '... ;!J I¡¡;:¡¡; ~¡: , .' i § ~! ~!",I~~';;! ~ii¡ , ' : Ii -:;<!~I';J"': æ ~!S ! , ¡"'I;;!';;!, Ii"" 0 ·ãi·~! ii- CClj ~ E Z z! :ci5ic7)¡O::~ : (A: iØ::::..c: "¡'~~I~i~! g -:'i5'.,si.cí.!!'{j;S: ",' ª' ~ ti;;IE ~¡~:~ ~1~i~,.'~.i.'~I;,!~,!~",,!~ !,,!~....i~ ~.~.,.i;í.I~"I~+..,¡¡,i; -~;;> ::> ::> ;;õÞ"t.....::> ..... ..... :;> .......... ~ ~t·,:.'~~.'.;¡:[·..!.· ~ :.i~I'-8;1: N~.'.' ~ ~;':~J:"~ ~,~.'~¡,'~ - -~-:o,ol-!~,olo ~:~ V) ",,¡o¡V'I:V'I!O¡ :o~oL! f I i L I : I i ,: ¡; -+- -- --.- .,..-t--.------ -r"-- ¡ , ! ! I/') Q .,., rX ¡.,. \". ... I§ ;;! j ¡ ð u .< .g j o , i"'O I~ 'þ 18 II¿ iÞ ~ ,., i::E = J_ ~ ¡:¡ " o ¡¡: -¡¡ is. 5 .š ¡~ Ie i?,t '0 ¡¡¡: i-¡¡ liS. 15 i] '" io JEL: II 15 i.ë ¡= '=> ] ~ ~ ~ ò " I- j I;; ¡ . '6 i~ I~ I~ l~ ¡ ~ ,~ i~ I ò ! ~ ¡~ if- :~ j~ ____J~____.._ i~_ ~ <: ~ ! Of) <= ~ III , '.q ] ~ ~ .¡; ~ = .. '" ãi ~ , j¡! " è5 J¡ ] '" u ,5 :z 1 ~] ãi IS :> ...¡ !iI <: <: = ~ .!! '" " ::E :( :( ¡¡ ~ e ~ 0 > .~ 11.¡; ...¡ æ ;;! '" '" '" '" ..c Ji3~ rñ '" '" '" '" '" =Iccl....'=!cc=!=ia:¡!cc cc.....'uiccl....icck, U U u,ccicciu!u cc u,u u u 0 U1UIU!CC U g'818igt¡!8Igr!S;?!~¡,'g8l88128jié~ ~ 2 g"~â21'g '8 '2Ig;s;i',:8 8 g:g 2 8 8 8)8IgI8'2 ...... N¡-'f'I"'I - OCI ~;\Õ r--- ....lV");N<~I"",fO'):~ 0 õ:: f""I 1""1 :.þ 0\ '" õ/oo \õ f"'1 ....... QC ..,. ~ - ""'t ,...,J"'V)!... õ .,.~ Ñ¡!-:ioõ¡'o' -: o;Joó¡"," .,.;1"';j~¡\ÓIr:¡'¿!M r-: -: oó r::M¡\Ó Ñ I ""';¡ò¡oó ..¿¡~ Ó -.6 r---'" .-"' oõ ..¿,r-:lr-:IÑ-'" - - -;'[ , "-1-; I 'I ~' I ' IN, '-I I - i- ! . ¡ j ¡ ¡ ¡' t ¡ I' J ¡ i I I ¡ ¡! I .; ; ! I f ¡ J ¡ g...... ,.8igfgfg·.rgtg 8)¿"gtg 8f8 88 8 8'8:81 8'8"818j "8~g 8 8'g'8 2' 8 gf¿1¿tg' ¿ ""I~¡f'!;~¡~ '·1.)f"'!i-:.l-=. ~ t'\! v:.1-:.1~<'Iif;. t""i - N ": "1,l"'!j~ I"'! ~ f"!1'~:~ t"'!.!"l V) t'f") I"'- N Õ "" -:':"'"l~¡'"'l DC!. ~ ~¡~i~¡~ ~¡~!~j" ~ ~ ;;;~p;;~!~ (:) Ñ........ V'I ~ ~¡~ ~ ~'oo!r"'qV) ('-!e- ~ Ñ -: -= 0:,.... \o!\Q.~ ~ , 1 ; ¡ : II! I ¡ 'I ' i i ,f·+L¡+/J.j 'j' .. ')1 I r . 'ii ¡II i ! I, I I I ¡ . I ' , I ,¡ I ¡ ¡ , I! , I 1 ì ~1~t~I~¡~~1JJ9 ~J~J~ A~!q;~ ;94919i~.~; 9 n ¡ ~ q ~~I~~:~ iii...! ",Ii'" ", '"' ca. '" '",'"' '"' ..I'" .., '" '" "j Iii Ii Ii, Ii; Ii' 1i¡¡¡1 '"I '"... ... iii "I ,,! Ii, Ii 71.."'.....[71..... .....;::;;,::;;'40 40 40140;40 4O¡4O:4o <: ~',.:t..:::;:;,::;: 77,717;.....,40140 40 "7'40 40 "7 <: 7:..... .....¡-,- ;:¡ ~IS;:¡!&!j&!!:è:èI;2 g¡g¡g¡gLg¡g,g ¿ 'V·;~i~ ~:~;~i~:;2:~¡~ ~ ~:~ M M ~ ~!~¡~iél~ 8 ~8' i8¡81g--¡g 8[-8i8181818:888 8'8t8t~ '8~r8!8T2t8T8 88T8 8 § 8 8i8 8tg:8 -: OCi¡..!t"'!f ~: .,¡ror:jl''''t-:,-:.. ~I~iv:.¡-:I~¡-.:t;.~f"! -: I'"'! "l:V:¡~j . ~;~!'"'!.I~;~:t'!¡~ "l ~:r-: "'i. .. "1 -:.1""1 r'1i""l:~ N f""- o.¡,.,...;t··"d,.r')¡O,Ni..ol. 0"<10j-100 M,oo,O N r- V"I:-..o¡O¡...c N;..¡OO'..·..,¡V')!r-tc- ,.,... Ni- - _ '" r--l\O \O:,.....;M ª ;1.;;;';:;¡...:....:N!~;¡;j;¡;f;j;,; ªª ~!~r;¡~;·;I~j~:ooi i~ ~éª ªªª~¡~¡~,¡;¡; ~ N1ÑiÑ ,..;:,..;/ Ñ'~i...... ~l~'.....¡......í.....¡..;'....... ~ ~ ...::.......'...:1'...: ..;,......'......¡......¡,.,,.,...... ...... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...:1...:1......1..;...: .,.. ......,11"\.,.. V"¡ ¡V") ¡- ¡f'f")¡f""\ ''''\,.,...;- -¡-;- - Mi-¡-I-¡- - - - _¡_ _¡,.,..._ , I I : , I ' , , 1 I I / I . I I ¡'! ¡ ¡ j ¡ i : ¡ ¡ ,¡ I ; , i I . '1" ",i"'l",i~1 ······I·['·TI1T ·¡¡,············rt·¡tl 1'-' 1 ~.. ~IT ";m:r -¡-¡-:fFI" .. " ~"~l ¡q=¡=(I" " :" " " " t1fj" : ill I i ii' II ¡ ! . í I I I i , ¡ ¡~ ~ ~ I~I .¡;I", ,,,I.., § ãi I~¡!I,Ì '~!ãi¡ ,~¡" ..,,,,,,è5I~II-¡, 0 ~ _,''''5'. :Sit! 'Ê:"; "i /:Ï; _:-¡;;/j J¡I !ilißja:l¡,.., [ u:> ~ - 0 0,1:,"", ¡P Ii:-''!! ;;;i¡~¡ g!.~I]¡v>¡~5 .. ~~¡;!~ :Z'cc, ìôix/-, ~¡ ~ ~ "':~i<:I~:~,~ ~ i ~,~!~I~ ~:Jijlª!~'~¡1 ~ ~'~'~~I~¡~ 'õ ~ . 0 of 0 'õ¡'õ¡~f' O!'õf O!'õ ~ ~¡~:~i~~i~ ~ z ;",:."i_;,;~r;: ~'~I~ z~:z¡~ i 1 ¡ j , . -'vL ",I.J' ~mJl~!g, 0 :t~l~j! ~~tl~~I~ ¡ I ¡ ! ¡ès -a ! i ! 1[,'~ ~ i ð ~I~IJ l! .." 1 ~ ~I'" "'I , 1i ;;;:'6 ~ ð ~ ~i~1 ¡¡I~!~ ~ ~!~ ~ ~ ~ ~!~ ~1~,'5 Z~¡~ ~ Z en ~'~ ~¡~.~ ~ ;;1.;:; ~ ;:: ~ ~!,;1;:g!I!~I~ &!'-I-(iV> J. ·.L ! I ::¡ ::¡ i j '" '" I~ ü ~ ü I~ U ~ ~ ~ iJ } 0 ~ ¡1! ~ I II>. J ~ § I·~ .. ..5 ~ /~ ..5 ¡;¡ ]]] I~ ]]] ~ ~ ~ ~ IJ¿ ~ ~ ~ ¡:;. I: ,~ ... " ~ ~~~ ~ !,¿!,¿!,¿ ~ 0 c c 0 10 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ uuc....~ 6 6 l- Ii ii " !s !s !; " .. .'" j! ~~~! '" ::;;::E '" j 9191<$'91919 iii; IiII aJ aJ !;; ~ ~:~¡1¡11¡1 N;N¡~:~~,(!; ¡ , "'..,.....]... 88:g; ~j~í~id:;;i; i ¡ ~ " "I" 'is <: ~j~:~ :~ ::!!'.œ;~;~'~: «I ¡;,.s':;¡; :;¡,<" ~~-6-6:¡¡,:5! ~!t¡~!~,E¡~ 0; 010;0: 01 0 i.rf0r'~· '1i. : . : ¡ . : ' . i ' i ~jo¡~:~¡~!~I~¡~¡~ju1u:wim ¿lglo' "!o!;::;/¡;:¡ècdgloic;'fg ~_I~;~'~i~I~I~'~¡~¡~i~:~j~ ~¡~í~:~!~;~I~;~i~f~¡~:M!~ 0;0: "': .;~L M·~c;i'T ....;, 0;0,8'8;0;N:N:8:0,8:8,818 J aj;'i~~I~!~,2.~I~II~!~!~,~+ ! I~¡~j , L }~t~" J.;"I"¡"","i~ILJ"I" .. . c¡>, c¡>1 . ;,¿" . c¡> . '.o:'¿" '1.0' " '; .1.1 .88 1sJ. !:~. i¡fill i".!': i i¡ il'.!':.!': i¡,!,! i: il ii" æ; i¡ i <ì........ -'- ..... _i_ ..... -. _,.....,-.,_.-.''''"''·1_1_ .....,->- 'j' ."" . . "." "".,!, . ."'...,!, ~Ig ~I~,~¡~'~ ~ ~1~i~!~¡~¡~iNI~¡~I~,h¡N 8Tg¿T§1~t8Tg 8t8i-8T§rgr8¡8T8t~gi 81 gig ~¡~ ~1~1~2'2 a;'j~!~'~i~!2,21~1~1~1~¡~ ê i ê glg¡glg¡ §§~§T§T§¡§j8¡g'g¡g¡ 8¡ . 8! g ~,~ ~!~¡~I~¡~ ~¡'~'~i~i~I~!~i~¡~I~¡~;~!~ , I ¡ , ,Ii' , I ' , i ......l....r··..·t ··..··r··' i ,··1..· ·t..·~ !..m~f""·l~--+~..+......j······ N!N ~:~f.¡. · .!~~.. ~~J.J~j.¡.j~I~¡~I~ +t++ tttiHrrjitt -¡--H I I ! ! ¡ ! ! v' ¡ ¡ ¡ :31 Ii: i" ~ :"i;~ "I ~j~' ~'";,,;,,I :~I~¡ i~l~ £,0:: ,,' I.;:;~! 0 >1<¡<'<:O::IO::.o::' ! ~I ~¡", =; u ~:~ ~'~¡~I¡{,)~ ~¡ ~!.~¡.~i~¡ iå'i >·1 -i>¡>i~:-::~ ,= f;j 01 ¡j,,g:;: ~ ~!.S'.5!:;¡' ,,' 1:; en, !II !I! 6: en:';; -, = '6,:¡¡¡,...J» i!!, ~ ~-6i:5!I'Ó ~.c¡ cl"; 5' 5 ...~o,,:.,.·......Jo" ß'ßI'';;J¡~ ~ ð ~¡.·>:.>:w¡¿I~,.'~;~¡~¡~.;~¡~ ...... ...... ~:"""'~~:"""'¡~I""~!~"'" ,\0-0, ~¡~¡ 0 : . o! , 10 o' O· u!l.~ ~i0t;~;,~ ;i0t~L;t0.i~i;Jti4Z!Z¡0 ~¡gIO!~;. ~1~¡~~N'N¡O;~~~¡~I~IO¡O!- ~¡~ ~lg 8¡~!~ ~!~¡~¡~!8¡gla¡s'S¡gia¡~¡~ ,L ,LLL...+ _.LLU__~_,J",.LJ !-LL ¡ N' N¡ i ! .+_.. "f'~'-"'¡"""~+'- ~1~1¡I~f~l~ .¡-¡OiN/..oioo -¡-¡-¡-j-,- ,¡ , I wjw o¡w w w¡wle ...[,......j...... ",.+,L. ~I~I~!~ ~ R¡'Ri~ ,.r¡j_~¡~ .. . 181188 gl¿lg ~'O,§¡,..... r--- .!..~", víioci!=!~ ~ ocil',õia( i , . 'f ... r .....~ .. t.. I ! i ¡ ¡ I ' ·---..t- "'1'" 4 ..·t· ·t- ~1!~;~i~I~19 9191919 9 ~IJ,.;,j.¡;' ~Ii i;..~ ~.' ~~;' < ~ ~ ~!~¡~ ~¡~ ~1~ ~i~ N N N:N¡- -,0 -¡- _!_ M :~g+-'~8t8-H-+8 8 ~18,~,8!~,~ ~,818'~ ~ ~¡I=I~.I=;~¡.g ";oÖl=id "" 818i.8i8¡t8:,'8 8!81g[g 8 ~¡~:~t,.r¡ ~:,.r¡ -'-1- . ~!~i~¡~I~¡~ ~i~¡~i~ ~ I ·..·'f....f.. . ! ' NiNINI· "'j,++.. §18¡~¡~¡~jg "';¡C:'ÓiOÓ·"¡¡-: N;N'f"'"'I:N'N:N ~ : , j : -¡(':¡+a: TM . ¡~ì~¡~ ;..:¡..:: "1j ..~I~!~ 9 .i.. »; ~ ~¡~ ~ 5:!~ I ; ----r-- ~!~f~ oóloô¡~ í . ¡ ; ~¡~r~ ~ri~ r MINiM ! . ,-+- I ì .-t-.- ~'r+- - I ¡ £,~~I~¡~!~ ~j~:.c £I¡!¡~ g!ã5 ~ ~¡~:~ ö2¡œ¡Ci= ~ 6'~j V'J ~ cñ r;;¡Vj,¡ ~!]i u¡~ ~ V'J¡.S)_ ;;;:.~ £ -=I'~:.''''' .5",¡ â,i,!¡;;; ;;; ;;;¡ ~:.'~ e;V'J.~::G ~ 0 ~¡~ ;;i::J ;:) ~¡¿¡ø.. O;"',.:~:~I 0'.... O.:'-I''''''·~ '- 0''-0·'.·... ., ~: ~¡ ~ .; ~ .¡ ~ ~; ~ ~ .j.; ~ is!wjUJ:UJ~+':' -ê:ñ~+UJ UJê:¥,¡~ .L.J.!~¡N¡O ¡ I j i J MI~'~'~I~;~ ·j~lœ;o ~ ~¡-i~ 8:~j8j8 8;8 ~!~.~!~ ~ ~¡~¡~ .J._l__1J_.. J.. ..I._..L..l ..J_J .- = I] = ~ :¡j¡ ~ ~ .; .. ,.. ¡:; ,¡:¡ Iv w ~ J I" ~ ¡¡: 'Lo. I~ ¡¡: 1! i1ì 1! f ';;' ;;. lê ~ .š 1- '.5 ß " -¡;¡ I.:. ] " .., .., ~ .. ~ ~ it 15 0 0:: , ' ex: ~ at: è ~ .~ ~ è è = I» !ii ~ ~ g ~ i~ » » ~ I'" .. 0 w ~ I~ ~ \.J c.¿ w I:- 0 '0 0 0 þ þ C ~ '" " ¡~ " C C C Is .- 'l- I- ,l- I- is is is a ." " Iv " ..., 3 ¡! E !! i! .... .. .... ¿ ~__~tI'J ~__.._.___..l~___.._._.______ ~---- ~.._- ¿ ¿ 01) Q ? '" 'Ò ~ " ãj at: " ~ -g -= ~ " OJ Iii < ~] ... < " .. 0:: IE » Z ,}j :¡¡ ,g ~ fi 01 ~ .. VJ VJ .to .. ::> ::> > ~ ~ is .. ...-- To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Agenda Request jF 05/16/06 Item Number Date: Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ X ] Board of County Commissioners Growth Management Presented By ~~~~ Growth Management Director Consider Draft Resolution No. 06-059 granting a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/ac) Zoning District. (File No.: RZ-06-004) Charles and Peggy Ward, has applied for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 dulac) Zoning District. The purpose of the requested change in zoning is to allow for agriculture, farms and ranches accessory to single-family detached dwelling, specifically for holding and raising 4-H and FFA animals on property located at 1245 South Jenkins Road, on the west side of Jenkins Road, approximately 1/2 mile north of Graham Road. NIA At the April 20, 2006, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 with three members absent (Mr. Lounds, Mr. Knapp, and Mr. Trias), recommended that the petition for the original request for a change in zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AG - 1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District be denied with the recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve the change in zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District. On April 21, 2006, the applicants provided a letter amending the application for a change in zoning from the RS-2 Zoning District to the AR-1 Zoning District. Approve Draft Resolution No. 06-059, granting a Change in Zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District. Approved 5-0 COMMISSION ACTION: [j[J APPROVED D DENIED [=:J OTHER County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: qy ~/<.!. Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget: ERD: Other: Purchasing: Other: Transmittal Master Checklist Charles and Peggy Ward Prima" Distribution Sent Received Environmental Resources Department, Amy Mott: N/ A Public Works Surveyor - Ron Harris: N/ A Road, Bridge, & Transportation - Scott Herring: N/ A Storm-water Management - Chris Lestrange: N/ A General Engineering - Kyle Croce: N/ A Zoning Supervisor - Paula Bushby: N/ A Attorney Prop Acquisition - loAnn Riley: N/ A Sheriff's Department - Major Monahan: N/A St Lucie County Fire District - Captain Derek Foxx: N/A Ft Pierce Farms/North St Lucie Water Control District - Ray Garcia: N/A Residential Onlv School Board of St Lucie County - Marty Sanders: N/ A Geo2raohical Based St Lucie County Utility Department - Mike Bowers: N/ A Commission Review: May 16, 2006 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners Bob Nix, AICP - Growth Management Director ~ <; b-- THROUGH: FROM: Andrew Riddle, Planner GfIV DATE: May 10, 2006 SUBJECT: Application of Charles and Peggy Ward, for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR- 1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District. LOCATION: The subject parcel is located at 1245 South Jenkins Road, on the west side of Jenkins Road, approximately 1/2 mile north of Graham Road. EXISTING ZONING: RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) PROPOSED ZONING: FUTURE LAND USE: AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential-1 du/ac) RU (Residential Urban) PARCEL SIZE: 3.85 acres PROPOSED USE: The purpose of the requested change in zoning is to allow for agriculture, farms and ranches accessory to single- family detached dwelling. Specifically for holding and raising 4-H and FFA animals. PERMITTED USES: Section 3.01.03(E). AR-1 (Aaricultural. Residential - 1) identifies the designated uses. which are permitted by right, permitted as accessory uses, or permitted through the conditional use process in the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1) Zoning District. Any use designated as a "Conditional Use" is required to undergo further review and approval before that use may be commenced on the property. Any use not identified in the zoning district regulations is considered to be a prohibited use in that district (see Attachment "A"). RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/acre) to the north, west, and south. The parcel to the east is PUD - Celebration Pointe. SURROUNDING ZONING: May 10, 2006 Page 2 Subject: Charles and Peggy Ward File: RZ-06-004 SURROUNDING LAND USES: The existing uses to the west, north, and south are large lot residential. Though property to the east is currently vacant, there is an approved residential development known as Celebration Pointe proposed for this site. The Future Land Use Designation of the surrounding area is RU (Residential Urban) to the north, south, and west. To the east is RM (Residential Medium). FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #1 (2400 Rhode Island Avenue) is located approximately 3.5 miles to the southeast. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject properties are located within the service area of Fort Pierce Utilities Authority. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way width of Jenkins Road is approximately 60 feet wide. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None scheduled. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Concurrency Deferral Affidavit. ********************************************************************* STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Board of County Commissioners shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed zoning district is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and has met the standards of 11.06.03. 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; May 10, 2006 Page 3 Subject: Charles and Peggy Ward File: RZ-06-0Q4 The subject property is located within an area designated as RU (Residential Urban) on the Future Land Use Map. The rezone request is compatible with the RU (Residential Urban) Future Land Use classification. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District is consistent with the existing residential and agricultural character of the surrounding area and the applicant's intended purpose of developing the property for agriculture, accessory to single-family detached dwelling. However the AR-1 Zoning District allows for a variety of agricultural uses (farms and ranches accessory to single- family detached dwellings), some of which may not be compatible with residential development. Several approved and proposed residential developments are in the immediately surrounding area. They are as follows: Celebration Pointe, located to the east consists of 755 units, Bent Creek consists of 692 units, Whispering Oaks is a proposed 374 unit project, and Brookside is a proposed 168 unit project. To the northwest of the subject property is San Michelle, which is a mixed use project proposed to contain 202 residential units and 111,000 square feet of commercial/industrial space. Millcreek is a proposed 406 unit project located on the north side of Orange Avenue across from Bent Creek. In addition to projects in the unincorporated area, there are several projects proposed within the city limits of Fort Pierce. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; Conditions have not changed so as to require an amendment. 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; The intended use for this rezoning is not expected to create additional demands on any public facilities. Any development will need to demonstrate that there are adequate public facilities in the area to support such development. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create significant adverse impacts on the natural environment. Any future development of the site will be required to comply with all state and local environmental regulations. May 10, 2006 Subject: Charles and Peggy Ward Page 4 File: RZ-06-0Q4 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; The AR-1 Zoning District allows Agriculture (farms and ranches accessory to single-family detached dwelling) and Animals, subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.03 (In the AR-1 district, animals other than household domestic pets may be kept provided they are not housed within one hundred (100) feet of any property line). The permitted uses in the AR-1 Zoning District should not produce negative affects on the existing pattern of residential development in the surrounding area. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The applicant is proposing to develop the properties with agriculture, farms and ranches accessory to single-family detached dwelling. The proposed AR-1 Zoning District allows for a variety of agricultural uses such as cattle ranches, hog farms, chicken farms, and other agricultural uses as an accessory use to single-family detached dwellings. Animals other than household domestic pets may be kept provided they are not housed within one hundred (100) feet of any property line. The AR-1 Zoning District is in harmony with the existing uses and rural character of the area. COMMENTS The petitioners, Charles and Peggy Ward, have requested this change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential -1 du/ac) Zoning District for property located at 1245 South Jenkins Road, on the west side of Jenkins Road, approximately 1/2 mile north of Graham Road in order to allow for agriculture, farms and ranches accessory to single-family detached dwelling. The subject parcels are approximately 3.85 acres in total area. The existing uses in the area are: to the west, north, and south are large lot residential. To the east is currently vacant, however, several approved and proposed residential developments are in the area. They are as follows: Celebration Pointe, located to the east consists of 755 units, Bent Creek consists of 692 units, Whispering Oaks is a proposed 374 unit project, and Brookside is a proposed 168 unit project. To the northwest of the subject property is San Michelle, which is a mixed use project proposed to contain 202 residential units and 111,000 square feet of commercial/industrial space. Millcreek is a proposed 406 unit project located on the north side of Orange Avenue across from Bent Creek. The subject property is located in an area which is currently utilized for residential and some limited agricultural uses. Even though the property is located within the urban service boundary and the Comprehensive Plan discourages the location of Agricultural zoning in the urban service boundary, several properties in the area have been rezoned to the AG-1 Zoning District recently. While these rezonings have previously been determined to be consistent with the existing development patterns of the area, they are not entirely consistent with the May 10. 2006 Page 5 Subject: Charles and Peggy Ward File: RZ-06-004 Comprehensive Plan designations for the future of the area and are not consistent with the approved and proposed residential projects in the area. At the April 20, 2006, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission heard the request of the initial application for a change in zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AG - 1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District. Staff recommended denial of the application with the consideration of the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously, with three members absent (Mr. Lounds, Mr. Knapp, and Mr. Trias), that the petition for the change in zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AG - 1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District be denied with the recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve the change in zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District. On April 21, 2006, the applicants provided a letter requesting that the original application for a change in zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/a) Zoning District be amended for a change from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR - 1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District. Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms to the standards of review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution No. 06-059. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. SUBMITTED: f.~ ~L1d- \W Bob ix, AICP Growth Management Director ar cc: County Attorney Growth Management Director Charles Ward File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 RESOLUTION 06-059 FILE NO.: RZ-oe-o04 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE RS-2 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMilY - 2 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE AR-1 (AGRICULTURAL, RESIDENTIAL - 1 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. lUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Charles and Peaav Ward. presented a petition for a change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the property depicted on the attached maps as Exhibit "A" and described below. 2. On April 20, 2006, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve a change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District. 3. On May 16, 2006, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 4. The proposed change in zoning has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 5. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the existing and proposed use of property in the surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. The proposed Change in the Zoning District Classification from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/ac) Zoning District for that property depicted on the attached maps as Exhibit "A" and described as follows: File No.: RZ-06-004 May 16, 2006 Resolution 06-059 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 133539 N 1/2 OF N 1/2 OF S 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4- LESS W 2 AC OF SD N 1/2 OF S 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 AND LESS E 550.01 FT - (1.92 AC) (OR 1000- 81: 1005-2109; 1204-1397) 133539 W 510.01 FT OF E 550.01 FT OF N 1/2 OF N 1/2 OF S 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 (1.93 AC) (OR 528-1343,1344: 1017-2312: 1204-1398) (Location: 1245 South Jenkins Road, on the west side of Jenkins Road, approximately 1/2 mile north of Graham Road.) owned by Charles and Peggy Ward, is hereby approved. B. The St. Lucie County Growth Management Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the change to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward XXX Vice-Chairman Chris Craft XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX Commissioner Joseph E. Smith XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 16th Day of May, 2006. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney Deputy Clerk ar H:\Development Projects 2006\Rezonings\Charels & Peggy Ward\BCC\Charles Ward res06059.doc File No.: RZ-06-004 May 16. 2006 Resolution 06-059 Page 2 1 Exhibit A 2 3 4 Maps 5 6 7 . General Location Map . Area Subject to the Change in Zoning 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 File No.: RZ-06-004 May 16,2006 Resolution 06-059 Page 3 :Þ <= ~ o Ü ~ ä: <= ca 'õ .E '"C '- ~ >. A.. co 0 0) ~ ¡¡¡ ~tl 0 Z+- N 0) . 0 . M () ~ ~ 0 t~ ..c. a.. I ~ (0 ~ ~ ~ ro '"C 0 ~ c:: N .~ ~ ~ CO ~ ro œ: a. CJ) 'ð(\ ~~ ~ () ace ~t a. a. -¡:: ~ ro CO ~ ..c Ü >. E ~ o Ü <= 'E ca ::i: PI:I1tV!1- u~ ..., ~ JIOpnH ! 5 3 3 H.... ~ " Pl:tuQ¡.I'::I 1"'0 "-0 1 ~ ; ~ ð ~uno~ aaqo4:Jaa)o ...--.- A petition of Charles a, ,: I eggy Ward for a changb In ¿oning from RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family-2) to AG-1 (Agricultural -1) I - \ ~ :;.I. t\} \ \ I \\ \ \ I _ U) '" ~ ------\ -< RZ 06-004 I \ PETERSON RD PETERSON RD - ~~ o a:: ¡...: I- W Z Z W !D L ê (fJ z ~ z w ..., (fJ I Legend 9:- .ÅucW &.-7~- {irlJ'Wtli Man4ßnnent 2J9'arhrumt ~ Subject property Map prepared March 13, 2006 N A Zoning Charles and Peggy Ward I I r IL RS-4 I K~-~ U PETERSONRD p,ETERSON RD - \ ~ ~ 0 I l a:: 0 f-~ a:: f-" UJ t'(,=>-¿ rJ) ,z z 'Z ~ UJ Z 'CI) UJ -, rJ) ~ \ R~ -2 PUD ; \ I I ~ ~ $ '\ \. , ~ , ~ AG-1 I-- g ~ ~ {'11 f-- <Þ 0'1 ~ AG-1 -< I I--- RZ 06-004 Legend 5è.Á~&~~_ N A (jrtrWrlf .Ma1JO(1emenr 2J9'arhnntr ~ Subject property Map prepared March 13, 2006 - Land Use Charles and Peggy Ward I I I 'VIAL RM I KM PETERSONRD p,ETERSON RD - !--- ~ ~ 0 I l a:: 0 ~ a:: w en 'Z z ,z s¡;: w Z 'CD W ..., ~ \ RU en \ \ RM I I ~ \1'1 $ \ \. , \ ~ - g¿ ~ ~ m - <0 (J\ 1 , -< - RZ 06-004 Legend 5è.Å~ a,~~= N A {irfrwrli NlZnØf1emenr 2lty"zrhntmr ~ Subject property Map prepared March 13, 2006 Charles and Peggy Ward RZ 06-004 Legend x- ~~ a,~~~ iirowt'/í Management ZJ",Partment N A ~ Subject property Map prepared March 13, 2006 April 21, 2006 TO: St. Lucie County Growth Management FROM: Charles and Peggy Ward RE: Rezoning Previously we requested a rezoning of our property located at 1245 S. Jenkins Rd, Ft. Pierce, Florida. Originally we petitioned for AG-l, we would like to amend our application ftom AG-l to AR-l. We have 2 parcels of land located at this address, 13-113-0001-000/1 and 13-114-0001-000/4. We would like both rezoned to AR-l. We appreciate your attention into this matter so that we may present this application to the Board of County Commissioners for approval. Thank you in advance for your help and cooperation. æÞ./£ / Charles D. Ward Q~0-~~ Peggy C. Ward APR 21 "n ~ Ron Wuchte Mailing address: P.O. Box 1178 Ft. Pierce, FL 34954 (772) 465-1153 Apri113,2006 Received BV APR 17 Growth Management Board of County Commissioners St. Lucie County, Florida 2300 Virginia Ave. Fort Pierce, FL 34982 In Re: Potential zoning changes File #: RZ 06-004 File #: RZ 06-006 Dear Commissioners; I am in receipt of two petitions for a change in zoning regarding the two files listed above. I live next door to the parcels in question and I strongly oppose a change from RS-2 to AG-l. I do not feel that any part of this neighborhood should be changed to agriculture since it has been residential for many years. A change from residential to agriculture will allow these two parcels to be used in a way that is not suited for this area, especially now with the large residential housing development being built directly across the street. My property value, as well as those of my other neighbors, will be negatively affected by this change. I respectfully request that the Board of Commissioners deny this zoning change. Sincerely, ¿¡11fI f4/ub Ron Wuchte 3.01.03 ZONING DISTRICTS A. AG-1 AGRICULTURAL - 1 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for productive commercial agriculture, together with such other uses as may be necessary to and compatible with productive agricultural surroundings. Residential densities are restricted to a maximum of one (1 ) dwelling unit per gross acre. The number in "W following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this Code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Agricultural production - crops (01) b. Agricultural production - livestock & animal specialties (02) c. Agricultural services (07) d. Family day care homes. (999) e. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1,000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) notifies the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. (999) f. Fishing, hunting & trapping (09) g. Forestry (08) h. Kennels. (0752) i. Research Facilities, Noncommercial (8733) j. Riding stables. (7999) k. ' Single-family detached dwellings. (999) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. 6. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00. 7. Conditional Uses a. Agricultural labor housing. (999) b. Aircraft storage and equipment maintenance. (4581) c. Airports and flying, landing, and takeoff fields. (4581) SL Lucie CounIy Land Development Code Adopted AugUst 1. 1990 3-5 RevIsed Through 05115104 d. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1,OOO) feet of another such family residential home. (999) e. Farm products warehousing and storage. (4221/4222) 1. Gasoline service stations. (5541) g. Industrial wastewater disposal. (999) h. Manufacturing: (1) Agricultural chemicals (287) (2) Food & kindred products (20) (3) Lumber & wood products, except furniture (24) i. Mining and quarrying of nonmetalic minerals, except fuels. (14) j. Retail trade: (1) Farm equipment and related accessories. (999) (2) Apparel & accessory stores. (56) k. Sewage disposal subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.13. (999) I. Telecommunication Towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999) m. Camps - sporting and recreational. (7032) 8. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following: a. Mobile homes subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.05. b. Retail trade and wholesale trade - subordinate to the primary authorized use or activity. c. Guest house subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.04. (999) Sl Lucie CounIy Land Development Code AdapIed August 1, 1990 3-6 RevIsed ihrOugh 05115104 E. AR-1 AGRICULTURAL. RESIDENTIAL - 1 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for single-family dwellings at a maximum density of one (1) dwelling unit per gross acre. together with such other uses as may be necessary for and compatible with very low density rural residential surroundings. The number in ·0· following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code ref~rence described in Section 3.01.02(8). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Family day care homes. (999) b. ,Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitativ~ Services (HRS) notifies' the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. (999) , c. Single-family detached dwellings. (999) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking Requirements O1f:'street parking requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.06.00. 6. Conditional Uses a. Crop services (072) , , b. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of another such family residential home. (999) c. Industrial wastewater disposal. '(999) d. Kennels - completely enclosed. (0752) e. Landscaping & horticultural services (078) 1. Retail: (1) Fruits and Vegetables. (543) g. Riding stables. (7999) h. Veterinary services. (074) i' Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999) 7. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00. and include the following: a. Agriculture (farms and ranches accessory to single-family detached dwelling). (01102) , SL Lucie CoIny Land Development Code Adopted Augus11. 1990 3·12 Revised Through 05115104 b. c. d. e. Animals, subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.03. (999) Guest house subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.04.(999) Mobile Home subject to the re'quirements of Section 7.10.05. (999) Retail and wholesale trade - subordinate to the primary authorized use or activity. " . ' ';',;" SL lucie CoIny Land DweIopmenI Code Adopted August 1, 1990 3-13 ~ Through 05115104 Major Group 07.-AGRICULTURAL SERVICES The Major Group CUI a Whole This major group includes establishments primarily engaged in performing soil prepara- tion services, crop services, veterinary services, other animal services, farm labor and man- agement services, and landscape and horticultural services, for others on a contract or fee basis. However, feedlots and poultry hatcheries operated on a contract or fee basis are includ- ed in Major Group 02. Induatry Group Induatry No. No. 071 SOIL PREPARATION SERVICES 0711 Soil Preparation Services Establishments primarily engaged in land breaking, plowing, application of fertilizer, seed bed preparation, and other services for improving the soil for crop planting. Establishments primarily engaged in land clearing and earth moving for terracing and pond and irrigation construction are classified in Construction, Industry 1629. Chemical trutmftt of 101! for cropI FertiUør application for cropI LIme Ip1UdÌJIC for cropI PIøwiq Seed bed preparation Weed ~troI. crop: before platillf 072 CROP SERVICES 0721 Crop Planting, Cultivating, and Protecting Establishments primarily engaged in performing crop planting, cultivating, and protecting services. Establishments primarily engaged in complete main- tenance of citrus groves, orchards, and vineyards are classified in Industry 0762. Establishments providing water for irrigation, or providing both water and irrigation services, are classified in Transportation and Public Utilities, Industry 4971. Aerial duatiD¡ ad IprayiDe BraciD¡ of orchard tr.- and vinII Citrull1'Oft cultivation III'YiœI Cultivation ~ mechanical and 0- Dew.liD¡ of com DiInR control for CI'OII, with or with- OIIt fertilÍlÍllf Dultillf cropI, with or without ferti\im- illf EntomolOlicalIllrYice, qricu\turll Hoein¡ IIIMCt control for cropI, with or without ferti1iain¡ Irriptiem I,.tem operation 1IIrYi_ (not pruvidiIIf _tar) Orchard cultivation IeI'YÌCel Plantillf cropI, with or without ferti1ia. in¡ Po1liDatillf Pruniac of orcbard ~ IDII vinII 8eIdiDc cropI, with or without fertilim- iDe 8eIdiDc oflproulJl and twip Sprayin¡ cropI, with or without ferti1ia. in¡ Surpry em orchard ~ ad vinII 'I'h!nniDc of CI'OII, mechaaical and chemical ~ 0JCbard: cultiyaticm of ~ 0JCbard: plaatillf. pnmillf, bI'II> iDe. 1pJ'&1ÌJII, remova\, ad lurpry Vineyard cultivation III'YiœI Weed control. crop: after platillf 0722 Crop Harvesting, Primarily by Machine Establishments primarily engaged in mechanical harvesting, picking, and combining of crops, and related activities, using machinery provided by the service firm. Farm labor contractors providing personnel for manual harvest- ing are classified in Industry 0761. 81 82 STANDARD INDUSTRIAL CLA......J'ICATION Industry Group Industry ,No. No. 072 CROP SERVICES-Con. 0722 Crop Harvesting, Primarily by Machine-Con. IIerriee, machine harvatIng or Nutl, machine ban>8ltin¡ or Choppin¡ and Iilo ft11in¡ Peanuw, machine barveItin¡ or CombinInI. acrfcultural Supr beetl, machine harvatIng or Cotton, machine banwtlnl or Suprcane, machine ~tin¡ or FrultI, machine harvatIng or Threehin¡ ...rvice GraIn. machine harvatIng or Veptabl... machine ~tin¡ or Hay mowtn¡, raIdn¡, baIin¡, and chop- pin¡ 0723 Crop Preparation Services for Market, Except Cotton Ginning Establishments primarily engaged in performing services on crops, subse- quent to their harvest, with the intent of preparing them for market or fur- ther processing. Establishments primarily engaged in buying farm products for resale to other than the general public for household consumption and which also prepare them for market or further processing are classified in Wholesale Trade. Establishments primarily engaged in stemming and redry- ing tobacco are classified in Manufacturing, Industry 2141. Bean cIeanIn¡ Nut hulliDc and ahellin¡ Com ahellin¡ PackacIn¡ rr.h or Cann-dried fruIt. Cotton IMd deUntin¡ and vept.aIIIe. ~ or corn. rice, hay. Cruitl, and Peanut aheWn¡, custom wptabI_ Potato curin¡ Flu ø-tlcatin¡ and rettin¡ Seed cleanln¡ fruit precooUn¡, DOt In CODJIectlon with Sortin¡. cracIin¡. and packin¡ or Cruiw tranaportadon and .....bI_ fruit ftCUWD coolIn¡ Swwt potato curio¡ Grain cIeaninc Tobacco cracIin¡ Grain rumiption Veptable ~Iin¡. DOt In connection Grain pindjD&, cuatom with tranaportation ~ ¡!nnjn¡ Veptable vacuum coolln¡ 0724 Cotton Ginning Establishments primarily engaged in ginning cotton. Cotton ¡!nnjn¡ GiM. cotton: operation or Cotton pickel')' 074 VETERINARY SERVICES 0741 Veterinary Service. for Livestock Establishments of licensed practitioners primarily engaged in the practice of veterinary medicine, dentistry, or surgery, for cattle, hogs, sheep, goats, and poultry. Establishments of licensed practitioners primarily engaged in treating all other animals are classified in Industry 0742. AnImalløpitù Cor IIWItocIr. Veterinary .me. Cor livøtock Veterlnariana Cor ¡¡....tack 07 42 Veterinary Service. for Animal Spec:ialtie. Establishments of licensed practitioners primarily engaged in the practice of veterinary medicine, dentistry, or surgery, for animal specialties. Animal spe- cialties include horses, bees, (lSh, fur-bearing animals, rabbits, dogs, cats, and other pets and birds, except poultry. Establishments of licensed practitioners primarily engaged in veterinary medicine for cattle, hogs, sheep, goats, and poultry are classified in Industry 0741. Animal h....ltù ror peI8 and other Veterinary IIIJ'Yicea Cor peW and other uùma1 epeclaltiee animal çecia1tiee Pet løpltù Veterlnarianl Cor peI8 and other animal çecIaltiee AGRICULTURE, FORESTRY, AND FISHING Industry Group No. 075 Industry No. ANIMAL SERVICES, EXCEPT VETERINARY 0751 Livestock Services, Except Veterinary Establishments primarily engaged in performing services, except veterinary, for cattle, hogs, sheep, goats, and poultry. Dairy herd improvement associa- tions are also included in this industry. Establishments primarily engaged in the fattening of cattle are classified in Industry 0211. Establishments engaged in incidental feeding of livestock as a part of holding them in stockyards for periods of less than 30 days (generà1ly in the course of transportation) are classified in Transportation and Public Utilities, Industry 4789. Establish- ments primarily engaged in performing services, except veterinary, for ani· mals, except cattle, hogs, sheep, goats, and poultry are classified in Industry 0752. e- :r. ts ld in y. oil 0752 1111 ioD ArtIficial inlemination ..me-. Ii... Itock Breedin¡ ofllYelltock Cattle aprayina CleanIn¡ poultry COOII Dairy herd improvement aaociatillllll Li-=ck breedilll ..rvicea Milk teatin¡ for butterfat PeotitIree NCord Iervicea for cattJe, bop, aheep, ....11, aDd poultry Sheep clippin¡ aDd IbeariD¡ Sbowin¡ 01 cattle, bop, Iheep. pall, and poultry SIaucbterin¡, CU8tom: for ÎJlC!iYidua1ll VaccinatiD¡ Ii.-ock, except by wteri· nariana 076 Animal Specialty Services, Except Veterinary Establishments primarily engaged in performing services, except veterinary, for pets, equines, and other animal specialties. Establishments primarily en- gaged in performing services other than veterinary for cattle, hogs, sheep, goats, and poultry are classified in Industry 0751. Establishments primarily engaged in training racehorses are classified in Services, Industry 7948. Anima1 ah.ltera PeotitIree NCord eervic:ea for pall and Artificia] ill8emination ..m_: animal other anlma1lpecialtiea lpecialtiea Sbowin¡ of pell and other animal ..... BoanIin¡ bo.... cIalti. Boarclilll kennela TI'aiDin¡ bonee, -pt racin& BreediJI¡ of uùmaII, other than cattle, TI'aiDin¡ of peII and other animal lpe- bop, aheep, ....11, and poultry cIaltiea Doc poomilll VaccinatiD¡ peII and other animal lpe- Doc IOIUIda cIaltiea, except by veterinariana Honey 1trainiD& on the farm FARM LABOR AND MANAGEMENT SERVICES 0761 Farm Labor Contractors and Crew Leaders Establishments primarily engaged in supplying labor for agricultural pro- duction or harvesting. Establishments primarily engaged in machine harvest- ing are classified in Industry 0722. of nd ng Crew leaden. fann Jabor: contract Farm labor contract0r8 of ;>e- nd 0762 Farm Management Services Establishments primarily engaged in providing farm management services, including management or complete maintenance of citrus groves, orchards, and vineyards. Such activities may include cultivating, harvesting, or other specialized activities, but establishments primarily engaged in performing such services without farm management services are classified in the appro- priate specific industry within Industry Group 072. !l8 nd her Citrul J'OYe lIIIIIIpIIIent and mainte- nance, with or without crop 8e1"Vic:es Fann mana¡ement eervicea Orchard manapment and mainte- nance, with or without crop aerviœa Vineyard lIIIIIIpIIIent and mainte- nance, with or without crop ..rvi_ 33 34 STANDARD INDU~ ct.. ,.,,1FICATlON Industry Group Industry No. No. 078 LANDSCAPE AND HORTICULTURAL SERVICES 0781 Landscape Counseling and Planning Establishments primarily engaged in landscape planning and in performing landscape architectural and counseling services. j I 'ti ~¡ ., Po: I; l' i: '1- Ii I !~ } 1 ~! ;r¡ ,i'ì! .il ¡ Garden plannin, Horticultural &dviaor7 or counselinl Nrvi_ LandKape architecta LandKape counnlin¡¡ Land8cape plannin¡¡ 0782 Lawn and Garden Services Establishments primarily engaged in performing a variety of lawn and garden services. Establishments primarily engaged in the installation of artifi- cial turf are classified in Construction, Industry 1799. Bermuda çriøiDc II8rviœe Cemetery upkeep, Independent Garden maintenance Garden plantin¡¡ Lawn care Lawn tertiliain¡ -m.. Lawn mowinc -m.. Lawn mulchin¡ ..m_ Lawn aeeclinlNrvica Lawn apra,yin¡¡ nrvi_ Lawn 1JIriain¡¡ Hrvi_ Mowin, hiahway center ItriJII and ... SeecIin¡¡ hiahway Itrill Sod 1ayiDc Turf inataIIation, except artü1cia1 0783 Ornamental Shrub and Tree Services Establishments primarily engaged in performing a variety of ornamental shrub and tree services. Establishments primarily engaged in forestry services are classified in Maijor Group 08. Establishments primarily engaged in general lawn and garden planting and maintenance are classified in Industry 0782, and those primarily engaged in performing shrub and tree services for farm crops are classified in Industry 0721. Arboriot Nrvica Ornamental bush plantin¡¡, pruninl, bracinc. oprayin¡¡. I'IDIOVIÙ, and Iur- Pr)' Onwnontal tree plantin¡¡. II'IIJIin¡¡, bl'lCÛll, oprayin¡¡, remDftl, and our- Pr)' Tree trimminl Cor public utility lin.. ~ Dl'lWDonta1: plantin¡¡. pruniJll, bncin¡, 1)II'a1in¡¡, removal. and our- pry Utility line tree trimmilll ..m_ BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS '%""~'~f~l!etel&~~"""'C"~%"'} COUNTY., FLORIDA GROWTH MANAGEMENl April 27, 2006 Joe Smith 1800 Anywhere DR. Anywhere, FL 34982 USA In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that Charles and Peggy Ward has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from RS - 2 (Residential, Single - Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR - I (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the following described property: Location: 1245 South Jenkins Road, Fort Pierce, Florida. THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST The second public hearing on the petition will be held at 6:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on May 16, 2006, County Commissioner's Chambers, St. Lucie County Administration Buüding Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing. County policy strongly encourages your input and comment at public hearing of this matter before the Planning and Zoning Commission and County Commission, rather than by contact outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). We encourage you to speak at these public hearings, or provide written comments for the record. The proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record, of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. Please call (772) 462-2822 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number: RZ 06-004. Sincerely, ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Doug Coward, Chairman JOSEPH E. SMITH, District No.1. DOUG COWARD, District No.2. PAULA A. LEWIS, District No. 3. FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No.4 . CHRIS CRAFT, District No.5 County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson Website: www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us 2300 Virginia Avenue - Fort Pierce, FL. 34982-5652 Administration: (772) 462-1590 Planning: (772) 462-2822 GIS/Technical Services: (772) 462-2822 FAX: (772) 462-1581 Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 FAX: (772) 462-1579 Tourist Development: (772) 462-1535 1(800) 344-TGIF FAX: (772) 462-2132 .¥ Agenda Item #8: Charles and Peggy Ward Andrew Riddle, Planner, this is a request of Charles and Peggy Ward for a Change In Zoning from the RS-2 Residential, Single Family 2 du/ac to AG-l Agricultural -1 Zoning District. The property is located 1245 South Jenkins Road. The existing zoning is Residential Single Family 2 du//ac and the surrounding zoning is RS-2. The purpose of the request for a Change in Zoning is to allow for agricultural production, livestock and animal specialties. Staff recommends that the board forward a recommendation of denial for the AG-l Zoning district with a consideration of the AR -1 Zoning district. Also is included is a letter from a neighbor, Mr. Wuchte, 1155 South Jenkins Road who strongly opposes this change. Andrew Riddle stated the applicant can have livestock on his property if the zoning was changed to AR-l. The applicants request for the zoning change in the application states for holding and raising 4-H animals for the St. Lucie County Fair. Mr. Nix stated the own . ould have to record a restriction on the property that two lots can be sold separately om ined as a single lot. e in zoning is not for the ucie County Fair for and hold hogs on a concrete -1 zoning which gives him the ombined into one parcel. e one to AR-l and the residents no more building. John Ward, . n the area and everyone wants to Her s tes she is grandfathered in. She has e and see the chickens and livestock and she anged to AR-l. Ron Wuchte, lived in the ere have been hogs on the property and the sing the property to park 12-15 commercial vehicles. om his property by having hogs on an adjacent just one or two hogs kept on the property. . ng lot is being paved and the trucks will be moved tomorrow. s, and is supportive of this AR-l rezoning. Michael Bryant, is S do a lot of work with underprivileged kids. Applicant, Charles Ward, 1245 South Jenkins Road to cl production of raising animals. The applicant has been i several years and the reason for the change in zonin . floor and a wash area. The applicant is in agreemen right to raise show hogs, if the two parcels of the propert Wade Tindle, represents 24 residents. In the e, he want strongly approve. He wants to keep Ft. Pierce 't was resident, lives next door to applicant. This is all keep the area the way it has been fo rs. Cath livestock on her property. Child 0 her h would like to keep it that way he zonin area for 16 years and his propert smell is bad. He states He is concerned that' property. He feels Charles Ward, applican John Odom, is just south 0 in favor of the animals. The Chainnan Hearn closed the public hearing. Ms. Caron stated that she perceives that several families who have been living in the area for many years are trying to preserve their way oflife. Land should be preserved and allow those who were here to preserve what they have. Mr. Grande stated after the public hearing is closed, staff give a recommendation to deny the AG-l and approve the AR-l. The applicant has indicated that this would suit his needs. Ms. Caron made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners deny the application of Charles and Peggy Ward for the Change in Zoning from RS-2 Residential Single Family 2 Zoning district to AR-l because it is consistent with the surrounding land uses. Mr. Grande seconded the motion. Mr. Grande further stated Ms. Caron is denying the change to AG-l and recommend that the County Commissioners 11 (Ø ..,0 00 ON . - (Ø'" 0.... N,c a::: ~ _ ca 'E:E caS 3: ca >0,'0 en... enGl GI .!!! Q., I!! 'Cc. I: C. cae( J!~ ... GI ca C. ,c 0 U ... ...Q., .g E en2 1:_ :;:'0 .- GI Õ 't Q., ~ e(O ~OOOID~ID~mmNmNN~O"'IDIDmID"'IDm~ O~~O~OOOMOOON~N~~O~O~~O O~MMMMMMIDMMM~MMMMMMMM~M 9~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~~~~M~~~~~O'" Q.,~~~~~~~~~~~~ffi~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ID Ñ~~~~~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~Ü~~ ID ~ M m NO OM MM ~M ~ .., m ~ ~ o GI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'g ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~c~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~.~ B·~·~·~·~·~·~·~·~ _.~.~.~.~.~.~ Q.,~~~~~Q.,~~~~~I:~Q.,~~~~~~oo~~~~Q.,Q.,GI tttttttttttt~ttttttttttttttt£ ~~~~~~~~~~~~oo~~~~~~~~&~~~~~~~ Q) Q)1õ o"E ~ Q) .~ '0 Q., :J tj 0_ ~~ ~ '0 ~ ~ ffi E 1:0 1õ ~ ~ ~~ ~ B ~~~~~ ~_ ~~ ~O~ 0 ~ a:::~a:::~a:::a:::~a:::~~~~a:::a:::a:::a:::a:::~a:::oo~a:::a:::~~~~~~ a::: 1:a:::1:~~~~~a:::a:::roa:::~I:I:~I:a:::I:~a:::~I:~~~~a:::E ~OOO:=:O:=:££co£:=::=:-:=:-OO-O:=:OO=£O:=:-O-=E 1:~~Q)I:~Q)I:!!~!Q)I:Q)I:E:JQ)I:!~~!~Q)I:~mQ)I:!~Q)I:!~ooQ)I:O ~~SCSCWW·~WCC;C~SSwSCS~CmScw~.5cU 0Q) Q)Q)Q)Q)~~~~Q)Q)~Q)~Q)Q)~Q)Q)Q»Q)~Q)Q)~£coQ) 0~ðQ.,mQ.,rooooo>oomm>mooQ.,Q.,00Q.,roQ.,~roooQ.,rooo~:Ero~ e~romomo~~O~~M~~~~~~~~~ o~mO~OOMO ~OO~~~~~~g~~~~g~88re~~8~~ID~~g~~~~ C~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~WW~~~~~~~~~~WN~M GI E ca I: ~ ~ GI I: ~ ~ I: 00 ~ oomQ):EQ) ~;S .~ .~ 13 ~coO.!!!:J ~::.::~w~ ~ ~~ Ü ~ ~~ ~ o5~coQi ~ë7j:::Jæ C) CO ~ I: CO E ~ Ü ì5ì .!!! ~~ Q.,O ~ .¡: ~ o :E GI E ca I: ~ N ... GI I: ~ o ç:- 00 w ~ ~ ~Q) I: > ~Eß~ ~~O~I: O=~_co J::E000> I: o ~ Q) ~ I: Q)~ ~ I: O,r= ~~ N Q) 1õ ~ N ~ I: CO 0 ~C) £ ~ 0 Q) !2. ~ "E ~~~~ - I: CO I: o Ü ~ ~ CO ~ CO o W:E ~ ~ W ~~ ~Q.,I:~:E~ ~ 1:C)Q)Ü>o,>o, ~ocoEQ)1: ~ 0 ~~I:D~Q)Q) coiiEo~wwco~o5W~~~~'5~~ B:E:E~~~wW:::JÜ~WC)j~~~ë7jë7j Q., ç:- ~ 00 ~ W ã) ~ ~ ¿~ ~ I:~XX~ ~Eß~:§:§¡ijQ)f- ~~0(\1:1:1:~130 O=~.þ(\Q)Q)O:JO J::æ:000>J:J:~f-~ ~ (\ o a::: ~~OOID~"'~"'M"'~OO~"'OO"'~~N~~~M~OOO~N~IDO 0000000000000000000000000000000 OOOOOOO~OOOOOOOOONOOOOOOOOOOOOO 0000000000000000000000000000000 o~o~~~oogo8~~~o~~o8o~~8~~~8~oo8 98888888888888888888888888888888 ~~NNNNMMM"'~~"''''~NNMN'''N'''N~NMMM~~O ~~~~~~~~~~NNNNv~~~~N~N~v~~~~NNO œ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~O ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8 caMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM..,MO Q.,NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN~ GI E ca I: ~ w~ 0 1: .~ c: a: () (J) J: GI.!!1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I: ~ I: en~.9-1: (\.E ~.3&LTIj~~B~ W I: (\ .¡: (\ :æ: GI E ca I:ç:- ~oo .... W Q) £ ... -....., Q) L.. 0 I:GI~~~~Q)õ~ ~ ~ g 8 ~ ~.!:: Ìii o&~:æ:~:E~~ .2:- I: :J o Ü N Q) Q) 1:1: I: I: ë3 1õ Q),r= ~ õßß ßc:ß -e ::J "E ~ ~ u .æ rJ) 't: .¡: 'E '¡:: ~ '¡:: (\~(\OO_~ã)~~(\~o~ ~U5~C)~æ~zë(ë(~ë(üë( Treasure Coast Newspapers ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA MAY 16, 2006 ,TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE Is hereby given In accordance with Sec- tion 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie Coun~ Land Devel- opment Code and in accordance with the provi- sIOns of the St Lucie County Comprehensive Plan that the following applicants have request- ed that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners considers their following re- I.Q~I~~~EL BRYANT for a ChanQelnZoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-l'amlly - 2 du/ac) Z,onlng District to the AG -I (Agricultural. 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the fOllowing de- scribed propertY: . 13 3S 39 THAT PART OF S 1/2 OF SW 114 OF NE 1/4 L YG EL Y OF E R/W 1-95-LESS S 42.S FT- (5.75' AC) (OR 692-2732). Location: West side of Bennet Roadl approxi- mately 1,950 feet south of Peterson Roao. , 2. HALF HOUR CUSTOM AUDIO AND ACCESSORIES for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the opera- tion of a Motor Vehicle Repair Service - Body Repair In the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for the following described property: ' LEXINGTON SQUARE LOTS 13 AND 14 (1.34 AC) (OR 20S1-182). Location: 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie. Florida. ' 3. SABIN COMPANIES, INC. fór, a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of ,a household goodswarehoùsing and storage mini-ware- hoUse facility in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning DI.,S, trlct for the following descrlbe.d, property' '.' , THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE EAST S60.0 FEET, AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR CANAL RIGHT OF WAY AND LESS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TOGETHER WITH: THE WEST S20.0 FEET OF, THE EAST 560.0 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 3S SOUTH" RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 FEET AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND THAT CERTAIN PAR- CEL CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST., LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI- DA, FILED FOR RECORD, ,OCTOBER 12, 1988 IN O.R.B. 607, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LU- CIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT· ING THAT CERTAIN, PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN O.R.B. 1098, PAGE 1842, AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI- DA. LESS THE WEST 742.98 FEET (8.9 ACRES) 'THEREOF. : ", ' " " Location: North side of Edwards Road, approxi- mately 250 feet west of South 2Sth Street. 4. SABIN COMPANIES, INC for a Change In, ?onlng from the RS - 4 (Residential, Single-Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning DIstrict to the PUD (Planned Unit Development ~ Orchid Place) Zoning Dis- trict and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the following described prop- erty:·" ' THE WEST 742.98 FEET (8.9 ACRES) OF THE FOL- LOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: THE SOUTH 1/2 bOF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 F SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 3S SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, ,LESS AND EX- CEPTINGTHE EAST 560.0 FEET, AND THE NORTH , 96 FEET FOR CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND LESS THERIGHT-OF'WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TO- GETHER WITH: ' THE WEST 520.0 FEET OF THE EAST 560.0 FEET OF THE SOUTH 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 3S SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 FEET AND THË NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WAY AND THE CERTAIN PAR- CEL CONVEYED TO'THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI- DA, FILED FOR RECORD. OCTOBER 12, 1988 IN O. R. B. 607, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LU- CIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT- ING THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND' DESCRIBED IN O.R.B. 1098, PAGE 1842. AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI- Lo~~tion: North side of Edwards Road, approx;' mately 650 feet west of South 2Sth Street. Tuesday, May 2,2006 5; TAILERS' COVE DEVELOPMENT, LLC for a Change in Zoning from the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Tallers' Cove) Zon- ing District, and Preliminary and Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the follow- T~~g~Ó~f~b~~~rt'~ PARCEL G, F.E. ENGLER'S PLAT OF SURVEY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, AT PAGE 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA, LYING WEST OF STATE ROAD A+A. " Location: 'West side of SOuth SR A-l-A; directly across from Atlantis I Condomlnlúms /6. CHARLES AND PEGGY WARD for, a Change In Zoning from the RS ·2 (Residential, Single-Fami- ly -2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR - 1 (AQr- Icultural, Residential - 1 dulac) Zoning Di"strlct for the following described property: 13 35S 39E 13 3S 39 N 1/2 OF N 1/2 OF S 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 ·LESS W 2 ACOF SD N 1/2 OF S 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 AND LESS E S5O.01 FT - (1.92 AC) (OR 1000-81: 100S-2109: 1204-1397) 13 3SS 39E 13 3S 39 W Sl0.01 FT OF E S50.01FT OF N 1/2 OF N 112 OF S 112 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 (1;93 AC) (OR S28-1343, 1344: 1017-2312: 1204-1398) Location: 124S South Jenkins Road, Fort Pierce, Florida. 7. JOHN WARD for a Change In Zoning from the RS -2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 aulac) Zon- Ing District to the AR - 1 (Agricultural, Residen- tial - 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the following described property: ' THE PARCEL CONTAINED WITHIN: , THE SOUTH, 112 OF THE NORTH 112 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF TAE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THE WEST 2 ACRES OF THE SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2, OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SEC- TION 13. TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM. ROAD RIGHT - OF -WAY.' " Location:: 127S South Jenkins Road" Fort Pierce, Florida. ' The PU8l1C HEARING on this Item will be held in the Commission Chambers, Roger Poitras An· nex, 3rd Floor, St. Lucie County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Flori- da on May 16, 2006, beginning at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. Action can be tak- en at this meeting, or the item can be continued to a future date and time. All Interested' persons will be given an opportunl-. ty to be heard. Written comments received In advance of the public· hearing will also be con- sidered. Written comments to the Board of County Commissioners. should be received by the Growth Management Department '. Planning Division at least 3 da~s prior to the, scheduled hearing. . The petition file Is available for review at the Growth Management Department offices located at 2300 Vlrpinla Avenue. Fort Pierce, Florida. . Please cal 172/462-2822 If you have any Questions or regulre additional Information. The file for this project may be Inspected prior to the hearing date In the Growth Management Department, 2300 Virginia Avenue, 2nd Floor, Th,F:1r.IÎ~~I:lg~~~ty· Bo~rd of County CommIs- sioners has the power to 4"evlew and grant any 'applications within their area of responsibility. The proceedings of the Board of County Commis- sioners are electronically recorded. PURSUANT TO Section, 286.0105, Florida Statutes, If a person . decides to appeal an~ decision made by the , Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record ,of the proceedings. For such purpose" he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which ,record Includes tlíe testimony and evi- dence upon which the appeal Is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceed- Ing, Individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. ,Any party to the proceeding will be granted an op¡¡ortunlty to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If It becomes necessary, a public hear- Ing may be continued from time to time as may be necessary to a date-certain. AnYOne. with a disability requiring accommoda- tion to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meet- ing at 772/462-lm or T.D.D. 772/462-1428. ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA 15/ DOUG COWARD, CHAIRMAN , PUBLISH DATE: May 2, 2006 Publish: May 2, 2006 1384761 lJl. ;¡i¡jU~l.tmj¡ -'"'~ , ~ COUNTY ..... FLORIDA ~ To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Agenda Request 6(} 05/16/06 Item Number Date: Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ X ] Board of County Commissioners Growth Management Presented By kA~~ --==tGrowth Management ¡rector Consider Draft Resolution No. 06-060 granting a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential-1 du/ac) Zoning District. (File No.: RZ-06-006) John Ward, has applied for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single- Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/ac) Zoning District. The purpose of the requested change in zoning is to allow for agriculture, farms and ranches accessory to single-family detached dwelling, specifically for tree and/or plant farming on property located at 1275 South Jenkins Road, on the west side of Jenkins Road, approximately 1/2 mile north of Graham Road. NIA At the April 20, 2006, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 with three members absent (Mr. Lounds, Mr. Knapp, and Mr. Trias), recommended that the petition for the original request for a change in zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AG - 1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District be denied with the recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve the change in zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District. On April 21, 2006, the applicants provided a letter amending the application for a change in zoning from the RS-2 Zoning District to the AR-1 Zoning District. Approve Draft Resolution No. 06-060, granting a Change in Zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District. Approved 5-0 " COMMISSION ACTION: [J[J APPROVED D DENIED CJ OTHER J% County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: ERD: Other: Purchasing: Other: Transmittal Master Checklist John H. Ward Prima" Distribution Sent Received Environmental Resources Department, Amy Mott: Nt A Public Works Surveyor - Ron Harris: Nt A Road, Bridge, & Transportation - Scott Herring: N/ A Storm-water Management - Chris Lestrange: N/ A General Engineering - Kyle Croce: Nt A Zoning Supervisor - Paula Bushby: N/ A Attorney Prop Acquisition - loAnn Riley: N/ A Sheriffs Department - Major Monahan: Nt A St Lucie County Fire District - Captain Derek Foxx: N/ A Ft Pierce Fanns/North St Lucie Water Control District - Ray Garcia: N/A Residential Onlv School Board of St Lucie County - Marty Sanders: N/ A Geo2ranhical Based St Lucie County Utility Department - Mike Bowers: N/ A Commission Review: May 16, 2006 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: THROUGH: FROM: Board of County Commissioners Bob Nix, AICP - Growth Management Director ~ G ~ Andrew Riddle, Planner \ti DATE: May 10, 2006 SUBJECT: Application of John Ward, for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 dulac) Zoning District. LOCATION: The subject parcel is located at 1275 South Jenkins Road, on the west side of Jenkins Road, approximately 1/2 mile north of Graham Road. EXISTING ZONING: RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) PROPOSED ZONING: AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential-1 du/ac) , FUTURE LAND USE: PARCEL SIZE: PROPOSED USE: RU (Residèntial Urban) 3.4 acres The purpose of the requested change in zoning is to allow for agriculture, farms and ranches accessory to single- family detached dwelling. Specifically for tree and/or plant farming. PERMITTED USES: Section 3.01.03(E), AR-1 (Aaricultural. Residential - 1) identifies the designated uses, which are permitted by right, permitted as accessory uses, or permitted through the conditional use process in the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1) Zoning District. Any use designated as a "Conditional Use" is required to undergo further review and approval before that use may be commenced on the property. Any use not identified in the zoning district regulations is considered to be a prohibited use in that district (see Attachment "A"). RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/acre) to the north, west, and south. The parcel to the east is PUD - Celebration Pointe. SURROUNDING ZONING: , May 10, 2006 Page 2 Subject: John Ward File: RZ-06-006 SURROUNDING LAND USES: The existing uses to the west, north, and south are large lot residential. Though property to the east is currently vacant, there is an approved residential development known as Celebration Pointe proposed for this site. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: The Future Land Use Designation, of the surrounding area is RU (Residential Urban) to the north, south, and west. To the east is RM (Residential Medium). Station #1 (2400 Rhode Island Avenue) is located approximately 3.5 miles to the sOutheast. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject properties are located within the service area of Fort Pierce Utilities Authority. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way width of Jenkins Road is approximately 60 feet wide. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: None scheduled. Concurrency Deferral Affidavit. ********************************************************************* STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Board of County Commissioners shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed zoning district is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and has met the standards of 11.06.03. 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the Sl Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; May 10, 2006 Page 3 Subject: John Ward File: RZ-06-0Q6 The subject property is located within an area designated as RU (Residential Urban) on the Future Land Use Map. The rezone request is compatible with the RU (Residential Urban) Future Land Use classification. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District is consistent with the existing residential and agricultural character of the surrounding area and the applicant's intended purpose of developing the property for agriculture, accessory to single-family detached dwelling. However the AR-1 Zoning District allows for a variety of agricultural uses (farms and ranches accessory to single- family detached dwellings), some of which may not be compatible with residential development. Several approved and proposed residential developments are in the immediately surrounding area. They are as follows: Celebration Pointe, located to the east consists of 755 units, Bent Creek consists of 692 units, Whispering Oaks is a proposed 374 unit project, and Brookside is a proposed 168 unit project. To the northwest of the subject property is San Michelle, which is a mixed use project proposed to contain 202 residential units and 111,000 square feet of commercial/industrial space. Millcreek is a proposed 406 unit project located on the north side of Orange Avenue across from Bent Creek. In addition to projects in the unincorporated area, there are several projects proposed within the city limits of Fort Pierce. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; Conditions have not changed so as to require an amendment. 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands' on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; The intended use for this rezoning is not expected to create additional demands on any public facilities. Any development will need to demonstrate that there are adequate public facilities in the area to support such development. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create significant adverse impacts on the natural environment. Any future development of the site will be required to comply with all state and local environmental regulations. May 10, 2006 Subject: John Ward Page 4 File: RZ-06-006 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; The AR-1 Zoning District allows Agriculture (farms and ranches accessory to single-family detached dwelling); based upon past Board of County Commissioners actions, a tree and/or plant nursery would be allowed as a conditional use under Landscaping and Horticultural Services (SIC description for 0783). The permitted uses in the AR-1 Zoning District should not produce negative affects on the existing pattern of residential development in the surrounding area. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The applicant is proposing to develop the properties with agriculture, farms and ranches accessory to single-family detached dwelling. The proposed AR-1 Zoning District allows for a variety of agricultural uses such as cattle' ranches, hog farms, chicken farms, and other agricultural uses as an accessory use to single-famiiy detached dwellings. Animals other than household domestic pets may be kept provided they are not housed within one hundred (100) feet of any property line. The AR-1 Zoning District is in harmony with the existing uses and rural character of the area. . COMMENTS The petitioner, John Ward, has requested this change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential -1 dulac) Zoning District for property located at 1275 South Jenkins Road, on the west side of Jenkins Road, approximately 1/2 mile north of Graham Road in order to allow for the future development of a tree nursery. The subject parcel is approximately 3.4 acres in total area. The existing uses in the area are: to the west, north, and south are large lot residential. To the east is currently vacant, however, several approved and proposed residential developments are in the area. They are as follows: Celebration Pointe, located to the east consists of 755 units, Bent Creek consists of 692 units, Whispering Oaks is a proposed 374 unit project, and Brookside is a proposed 168 unit project. To the northwest of the subject property is San Michelle, which is a mixed use project proposed to contain 202 residential units and 111,000 square feet of commercial/industrial space. Millcreek is a proposed 406 unit project located on the north side of Orange Avenue across from Bent Creek. The subject property is located in an area which is currently utilized for residential and some limited agricultural uses. Even though the property is located within the urban service boundary and the Comprehensive Plan discourages the location of Agricultural zoning in the urban service boundary, several properties in the area have been rezoned to the AG-1 Zoning District recently. While these rezonings have previously been determined to be consistent with the existing development patterns of the area, they are not entirely consistent with the May 10, 2006 Page 5 Subject: John Ward File: RZ-06-006 Comprehensive Plan designations for the future of the area and are not consistent with the approved and proposed residential projects in the area. At the April 20, 2006, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission heard the request of the initial application for a change in zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AG - 1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District. Staff recommended denial of the application with the consideration of the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District. The Planning and Zoning Commission voted unanimously, with three members absent (Mr. Lounds, Mr. Knapp, and Mr. Trias), that the petition for the change in zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AG - 1 (Agricultural - 1 du/acre) Zoning District be denied with the recommendation that the Board of County Commissioners approve the change in zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District. On April 21, 2006, the applicant provided a letter requesting that the original application for a change in zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/a) Zoning District be amended for a change from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR - 1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District. Staff has reviewed this 'petition and determined that it conforms to the standards of review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution No. 06-060. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. SUBMITTED: ~0~ Bob Nix, AICP Growth Management Director ar cc: County Attorney Growth Management Director John Ward File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 RESOLUTION 06-060 FILE NO.: RZ-0&-006 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE RS-2 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMilY -2 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE AR-1 (AGRICULTURAL, RESIDENTIAL - 1 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. lUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. John Ward. presented a petition for a chànge in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the property depicted on the attached maps as Exhibit "A" and described below. 2. On April 20, 2006, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve a change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 dulse) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District. 3. On May 16, 2006, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. ,4. The proposed change in zoning has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 5. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the existing and proposed use of property in the surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A The proposed Change in the Zoning District Classification from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/ac) File No.: RZ-06-OO6 May 16, 2006 Resolution 06-060 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23. 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 Zoning District for that property depicted on the attached maps as Exhibit "Anand described as follows: THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THE WEST 2 ACRES OF THE SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ALSO LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM ROAD RIGHT OF WAY. LESS THE FOLLOWING: THE WEST 174 FEET OF THE EAST 244 FEET OF THE SOUTH 120 FEET AND THE WEST 30 FEET OF THE EAST 70 FEET OF THE SOUTH 30 FEET OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/2 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, AS RECORDED IN O.R. BOOK 726, PAGE 1269 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. (Location: 1275 South Jenkins Road, on the west side of Jenkins Road, approximately 1/2 mile north of Graham Road.) owned by John H. Ward, is hereby approved. B. The St. Lucie County Growth Management Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the change to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward XXX Vice-Chairman Chris Craft XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX Commissioner Joseph E. Smith XXX File No.: RZ-06-006 May 16. 2006 ResolutiOn 06-060 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 16th Day of May, 2006. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney Ar H:\Development Projects 2006\Rezonings\John Ward\BOCC\John Ward res06060.doc File No.: RZ-06-006 May 16. 2006 Resolution 06-060 Page 3 1 Maps 2 3 4 · General Location Map · Area Subject to the Change in Zoning 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 File No.: RZ-06-006 May 16, 2006 Resolution 06-060 Page 4 ,j' <0 0 "C CO ¡¡;¡ 0 z~. ' II C\ ~ 0 N j ~ Ñ 0 t~ C\ I ~ ~ CO ~ ~ ~ I ct] c: 0 ::: ~ N .~ f "C 0 ~ a::: ct] J (\ \{~ Q. acell ~ ~l Q. Q. ~ ct] ::: II ~oo(\ ! \,.11 , ~ e( ~\ ¡:. c: ::> o Ü ~ ä:: c: . ë ::> o Ü c: t: ~ ! ~ "'.u1 U'Y _:;I J.,..... ~ :¡ ... "":) no:) t f I!I ~uno:> aaqolpae)o A petition of John Wa¡ _. .Jr a change in Zoning fl _I.. RS..2 (Residential, Single-Family-2) to AG-1 (Agricultural-1) I NSLRWMD CANAL NO. 35 NSLRWMD CANAL NO. 35 ¡::>ETERSON RD PETERSON RD= ~/////~ 0 0 a::: a::: en 1--- z r- ~ w z z z w ...., w en CD !\ I \ I \ \ \ ~ \ ~ ~ ~ !T1 to (]I ~ -< \ RZ 06-006 Legend 5è~~ a,~~. N A (jr_rli .JItt!l7UffØIrinÚ 2J9N""hrumr ~ Subject property Map prepared March 22, 2006 Zoning John Ward I U IL RS-4 RS 3 NSLRWMD CANAL NO. 35 l,; G,NAL NCJ. 3:: PETERSON RD p'E:rE~SJ:?N _ RD..... L- I RS-2 Q ~'////1 Q 0:::. 0::: ~1 (/) z w ~ z z z w w ..., a¡ (/) R~ -? \ PUD \ \ I \ , AG-1 ~ ~ ~ ~ (T\ to (1\ ! RZ 06-006 Legend 9:-,ÁuØç ~-7~- N Â ~ Subject property {jTtTW~,f .JIIiZ7I6t1trtium~ :O'!P'Z"hru7I~ Map prepared March 22, 2006 · Land Use John Ward M )(0 RM R~ NSLRWMD CANAL NO. 35 '-'ANAL I'IV. ,,;) PETERSON RD p'ET:EF~~S9N. RD.... 0 ~////.~ 0 0:: 0::. C/) ::~ z w 52 z z z w w RU -, CD C/) R W RM \ \ \ I \ 1 3 ~ ~ ?; rT\ cD (J\ I -< , RZ 06-006 Legend x-.Á~~~_ N A (jr_tli .MIDIØ(ltmltmt 279N"twltmt ~ Subject property Map prepared March 22, 2006 John Ward RZ 06-006 Legend ~ Subject property a ~ 1'J_U:¡ ~:!::'~, (jr_tli J£fana¡¡emcnt ZJepartmcnt Map prepared March 22, 2006 JOHN H WARD & SON CONTRACTORS, INC. 1275 South Jenkins Road Fort Pierce, Florida 34947 772-464-3616 fax 772-464-3673 April 21, 2006 81. Lucie Co. Planning and Zoning Ft. Pierce, FI Dear Sirs, This letter is to inform you that I am am in agreement with the boards decision to recommend changing my recent application for a zoning change. Instead of an AG-1, I would like the AR -1 rezoning. ]:2Y' ¡If/JJ lhn H. Ward . APR 2 i lUn6 3.01.03 ZONING DISTRICTS A. AG-1 AGRICULTURAL - 1 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for productive commercial agriculture, together with such other u$es as may be necessary to and compatible with productive agricultural surroundings. Residential densities are restricted to a maximum of one (1) dwelling unit per gross acre. The number in -0- following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this Code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Agricultural production - crops (01) b. Agricultural production - livestock & animal specialties (02) c. Agricultural services (01) d. Family day care homes. (999) ',' " e. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1,000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) notifies the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. (999) . f. Fishing, hunting & trapping (09) g. Forestry (08) h. Kennels. (0752) i. Research Facilities, Noncommercial (8733) j. Riding stables. (7999) , k. ' Single-family detached dwellings. (999) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional 'Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. 6. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00. 7. Conditional Uses a. Agricultural labor housing. (999) b. Aircraft storage and equipment maintenance. (4581) c. Airports and flying, landing, and takeoff fields. (4581) Sl Lucie CounIy Land Development Code Adopted AugUs11. 1990 3-5 RevIsed Through ò5I15Ì04 d. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1,000) feet of another such family residential home. (999) e. Farm products warehousing and storage. (4221/4222) f. Gasoline service stations. (5541) g. Industrial wastewater disposal. (999) h. Manufacturing: (1) Agricultural chemicals (287) (2) Food" & kindred products (20) (3) Lumber & wood products, except furniture (24) i. Mining and,quarrying of nonmetalic minerals, except fuels. (14) j. Retail trade: (1) Farm equipment and related accessories. (999) (2) Apparel & accessory stores. (56) k. Sewage disposal subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.13. (999) I. Telecommunication Towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999) m. Camps - sporting and recreational. (7032) 8. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following: a. Mobile homes subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.05. b. Retail trade and wholesale trade - subordinate to the primary authorized use or activity. c. Guest house subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.04. (999) 51. lucie COunIy Land DeveIopmenI Code AdapIId August 1. 1990 3-6 RevIs4id ThrOugh 05115104 E. AR-1 AGRICULTURAL. RESIDENTIAL - 1 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for single-family dwellings at a maximum density of one (1) dwelling unit per gross acre, together with such other uses as may be necessary for and compatible with very low density rural residential surroundings. The number in ·0· following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code ref~rence described in Section 3.01.02{B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Family day care homes. (999) b. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1 000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HAS) notifies' the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HAS. (999) , c. Single-family detached dwellings. (999) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking Requirements Off·street parking requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.06.00. 6. Conditional Uses a. Crop services (072) b. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand{1 000) feet of another such family residential home. (999) c. Industrial wastewater disposal. '(999) d. Kennels - completely enclosed. (0752) e. Landscaping & horticultural services (078) 1. Retail: (1) Fruits and Vegetables. (543) g. Riding stables. (7999) h. Veterinary services. (074) i ' Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999) 7. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following: a. Agriculture (farms and ranches accessory to single-family detached dwelling), (01102) Sl Lucie CoIdy Land Development Code Adopted Augusl1, 1990 3-12 RevIsed Through 05I15t04 b. Animals, subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.03. (999) c. Guest house subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.04. (999) d. Mobile Home subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.05. (999) e. Retail and wholesale trade - subordinate to the primary authorized use or activity. ...~. St. lucie CounIy Land Development Code AdDpIId August 1, 1990 3-13 - Revisèd Through 05115104 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ·S~T7'~eì1elf~~""" . , COUNTY ~ FLORIDA' GROWTH MANAGEMENl April 27, 2006 Joe Smith 1800 Anywhere DR. Anywhere, FL 34982 USA In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that John Ward has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning from RS - 2 (Residential , Single - Family - 2 dulac) Zoning District to the AR - I (Agricultural, Residential - I dulac) Zoning District for the following described property: Location: 1275 South Jenkins Road, Fort Pierce, Florida. THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST The second public hearing on the petition will be held at 6:00 P.M., or as soon thereafter as possible, on May 16, 2006, County Commissioner's Chambers, SL Lucie County Administration Building Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportw1Íty to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least 3 days prior to a scheduled hearing. County policy strongly encourages your input and comment at public hearing of this matter before the Planning and Zoning Commission and County Commission, rather than by contact outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). We encourage you to speak at these public hearings, or provide written comments for the record. The proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such pwpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party, to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. Please call (772) 462-2822 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number: RZ 06-006. Sincerely, ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Doug Coward, Chairman JOSEPH E. SMITH, District No.1. DOUG COWARD, District No.2. PAULA A, LEWIS, District No. 3. FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No. 4 . CHRIS CRAFT, District No.5 County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson Website: www.co.st-lucie.fI.us 2300 Virginia Avenue - Fort Pierce, FL. 34982-5652 Administration: (772) 462-1590 Planning: (772) 462-2822 GISrrechnical Services: (772) 462-2822 FAX: (772) 462-1581 Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 FAX: (772) 462-1579 Tourist Development: (772) 462-1535 1(800) 344-TGIF FAX: (772) 462-2132 Major Group 07.-AGRICULTURAL SERVICES The Major Group as a Whole This major group includes establishments primarily engaged in performing soil prepara- tion services, crop services, veterinary services, other animal services, farm labor and man- agement services, and landscape and horticultural services, for others on a contract or fee basis. However, feedlots and poultry hatcheries operated on a contract or fee basis are includ- ed in Major Group 02. Industry Group Industry No. No. 071 SOIL PREPARATION SERVICES 0711 Soil Preparation Services Establishments primarily engaged in land breaking, plowing, application of fertilizer, seed bed preparation, and other services for improving the soil for crop planting. Establishments primarily engaged in land clearing and earth moving for terracing and pond and irrigation construction are classified in Construction, Industry 1629. Chemical treatment of IOil for crope Fertilizer application far crope Lime apreadin¡ far crope PlowiD¡ Seed bed preperation Weed ~trol. crop: before plantiDc 072 CROP SERVICES 0721 Crop Planting, Cultivating, and Protecting Establishments primarily engaged in performing crop planting, cultivating, and protecting services . Establishments primarily engaged in complete main- tenance of citrus groves, orchards, and vineyards are classified in Industry 0762. Establishments providing water for irrigation, or providing both water and irrigation services, are clàssified in Transpørtation and Public Utiij.ties, Industry 4971. Aerial duatiDg IInd .prayÍIII BI1ICÙI&' of orcbard U- IInd vin.. Citrul ...... cultivation IIIrviceI Cultivation MrViCll, mecbanica1 IUId flame ~ofcom DiIeue ccmtrol far crope. with ar with- outferti1ising Dustin¡ cropI, with ar without fertilia- in¡ Entomological ..rvice. IllriculturaI Hoein¡ InlllCt ccmtrol for cropl. with ar without ferlilidn¡ , Irription I)'Item operation MrViCIII (not providin¡ water) Orchard cultivation ..rviCIII P1antiD( cropI, with or without fertiIia- ÍIII Po11inatiD( PrunÍIII of orchard U- IInd vineI Seedin¡ cropI, with ar without fertilia- ÍIII Seedin¡ of .proutllUld twip Sprayin¡ cropI, with ar without fertiIia- ÍIII Surpry 01\ orchard u- IUId vin.. 'l'hiDnina of croll, mechanical IUId chemical ~ orc:hard: cultivation of ~ orc:hard: plantiD¡. prunin¡. bnc- ÍIII. .prayin¡. removal, IInd .u....ry Vmeyard cultivation MrViCIII Weed ccmtroI. crop: after plllntiDc 0722 Crop Harvesting, Primarily by Machine Establishments primarily engaged in mechanical harvesting, picking, and combining of crops, and related activities, using machinery provided by the service firm. Farm labor contractors providing personnel for manual harvest- ing are classified in Industry 0761. 81 approve a zoning change to AR-1. Attorney Heather Young stated if the applicant is willing to it, it can be advertised as AR-1 based on the recommendation. The applicant should send a letter to the Growth Management Dept advising them that the application should be amended to AR-1. Roll Call Ms. Caron - Yes to approve AR-1 zoning district Mr. Grande - Yes to approve AR-1 Ms. Hammer - Yes to approve AR-1 Ms. Morgan - Yes Mr. Mundt - Yes to approve AR-1 Chainnan Hearn - Yes The application has been unanimously approved to Change in Zoning to AR-1 .f A~enda Item #9: John Ward Andrew Riddle, Planner, this is the request of John H. Ward Residential Single Family 2 du/ac Zoning District to the located at 1275 South Jenkins Road. The purpose ofth agricultural production crops for a future tree or pI forward a recommendation of denial for the AG-1 0 Zoning District. Andrew Riddle, Planner, stated that the do with a Conditional Use under AR-I Zoni <, r crop pro ge in Zoning from the istrict. The property is in Zoning is to allow for s that the Board t with a onsideration of the AR-1 . cant can do what he states he wants to Chainnan Hearn opened the public hearing. John Ward, applicant, stated he' Attorney Heather Young reco get this resolved before it goes t accessory to the existin 1 zoning. She further ted she shrubs and trees to sell. with the public hearing and attempt to try to ng the house on the property and it being an licant has indicated that he will be acceptable to the AR- a Conditional Use pennit will not be required. Ms. Hammer has made a mo at the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of Count Commissioners deny the application for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 Residential Single Family 2 dulac Zoning District to the AG-1 Agricultural One Zoning District but approve the Zoning Change from RS-2 Residential Zoning District to AR-1 Zoning District because it seems to fit the area. The motion has been seconded by Mr. Grande. The application was unanimously approved without a roll call vote. Agenda Item # 10: International Investment Partners. LLC and Barbieri & Screnci. LLC Linda Pendarvis, Planner, petition is a request for a Change in Zoning from RS-4 Residential Single Family 4 dulac Zoning District to the PUD Planned Unit Development - Lakeside Village Zoning District. A residential development of 92 single family residential lots on 24.46 acres located on the North side of Indrio Road approximately 1900 ft East ofK.ings Highway. Staff recommends that this petition be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval subject to the following conditions: consistent with other development approvals granted prior to or as part of final platting of the subject property. The developers shall be required to 12 approve a zoning change to AR-l. Attorney Heather Young stated if the applicant is willing to it, it can be advertised as AR-l based on the recommendation. The applicant should send a letter to the Growth Management Dept advising them that the application should be amended to AR-l. Roll Call Ms. Caron - Yes to approve AR-I zoning district Mr. Grande - Yes to approve AR-l Ms. Hammer- Yes to approve AR-l Ms. Morgan - Yes Mr. Mundt- Yes to approve AR-l Chainnan Hearn - Yes The application has been unanimously approved to Change in Zoning to AR-l Chainnan Heam opened the public hearing. shrubs and trees to sell. with the public hearing and attempt to try to ng the house on the property and it being an licant has indicated that he will be acceptable to the AR- a Conditional Use permit will not be required. Agenda Item #9: John Ward Andrew Riddle, Planner, this is the request of John H. Ward Residential Single Family 2 dulac Zoning District to the located at 1275 South Jenkins Road. The purpose ofth agricultural production crops for, a future tree or pI forward a recommendation of denial for the AG-l 0 Zoning District. Andrew Riddle, Planner, stated that the do with a Conditional Use under AR-l Zoni r crop pro John Ward, -applicant, stated he' Attorney Heather Young reco get this resolved before it goes to accessory to the existin 1 zoning. She further Ms. Hammer has made a mo at the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of Count Commissioners deny the application for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 Residential Single Family 2 dulac Zoning District to the AG-l Agricultural One Zoning District but approve the Zoning Change from RS-2 Residential Zoning District to AR-l Zoning District because it seems to fit the area. The motion has been seconded by Mr. Grande. The application was unanimously approved without a roll call vote. Agenda Item # 10: International Investment Partners. LLC and Barbieri & Screnci. LLC Linda Pendarvis, Planner, petition is a request for a Change in Zoning from RS-4 Residential Single Family 4 dulac Zoning District to the PUD Planned Unit Development - Lakeside Village Zoning District. A residential development of 92 single family residential lots on 24.46 acres located on the North side of Indrio Road approximately 1900 ft East of Kings Highway. Staff recommends that thiš petition be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval subject to the following conditions: consistent with other development approvals granted prior to or as part of final platting ofthe subject property. The cievelopers shall be required to 12 CD a a N M N .::. CD ~ a III q:¡¡¡ CD ... a Q) N .! 0:: I! -0. 'Eo. 111« ~~ C Q) '::'0. ~e ...a. .2E g'e .- ... ~-g Õ .~ a. ::J «0 ~ 0) CIO <0 ... <0 ... 0) 0) N 0) N N 0 ,... 0 v <0,1<0 8 0) è!; 0) ... 0 ,... ... 0 ..... 0 0 0 C") 0 0 0 ..... N ..... N qlq 0 10 0 C") ..... C") C") C") C") C") C") <0 C") C") C") C") 10 C") C") C") C") C") 10 C") C") ..... v v v "'t "'t v 10 "'t "'t "'t "'t ..... "'t "'t "'t "'t "'t ..... "'t C") , , I , , I I , V ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... ,... N ,... ,... ,... ,... ~ ,... ,... ,...,... ,... ,... ,... C") ,... 10 ,... ,... 0 V 10 V -a; V V -a; -a; CIO -a; -a; -a; -a; -a; v -a;-a; -a; v -a; CIO -a; -a; -a; -a; 10 ..... 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) <0 ~ v v v ~ ~ ~ v ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N C") C") C") C") N 0) ~ ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J 0 ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J « ...J u. U. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. ~ u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. Ü u. ~ Q) Q) Iii ~ ê Q) ê ~ ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê ê '0 Q) ê ê ê ê 'E " ::J ~ ... ... C ...J Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) 0 Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) éi5 Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) "C ë: ë: ë: ë: ë: ë: ë: ë: ë: ë: ë: ë: 'E ë: ë: ë: ë: ë: ë: ë: ë: ë: ë: ë: ë: Q) ::J III t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: ~ t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: t:: C ...J 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ¡~ û: u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. u. C/) u. u. u. u. u. u. u. a. u. u. u. u. U. "C "C "C > 0:: 0::: ãi E C 0 ãi "C "C "C 0 "C "C "C "C 0 10 '0 "C "C 0::: 0::: Q) 0:: ::: 0::: "C "C 0::: éi5 0::: 0::: (/ ..... ... 0::: "C 0::: "C > "C "C "C 0 "C 0::: 0::: "C "C "C "C C ..... Q) c 0::: c 0::: (/ (/ <: (/ 0::: 0::: 0::: CD 0::: (/ c c 0::: (/ 0::: .::. 0::: (/ 0::: (/ .::. ::: E c c c c c u c c 0 CIO 0::: 0 ::: .- 32 III 32 ::: =ä; ::: - ::: 32 0 0 =ä; 32 ::: III ::: 32 ::: 32 .., éi5 E ,... (/ Q) e Q) ..10: ï: Q) Q) ::J Q) e e Q) Q) Q) ..... ... c c c c c c c c E c c c c c Q) c c c C "C 0 .s .s Q) Q) 'ê1 Q) Q) Q) .s Q) a. Q) Q) c Ü ... c c c c c Iii c c c c c >. ïij (/ Q) Q) Q) Q) .., .., .., Q) Q) Q) Q) .., Qj Q) Q) .., Q) ~ Q) .., Q) .., 0 (/ >< a. CD a. CD C/) C/) 5 C/) CD CD CD ~ CD C/) a. a. CD C/) CD CD C/) CD C/) ü: ~ ~ t!! 0 z CD 0) 0 0) 0 10 10 0 10 10 C") ..... 10 ..... ..... 10 10 ..... 10 10 0 ..... 0 ..... 0 0 0 "C 0 10 0 C") V V ,... 0 v v CIO CIO CIO 0 0 0 0 0 CIO 0) ..... 0 ..... 0 0 0 81 0 "C 0) ..... 0). ..... N N C") N ..... 0 C") ..... C") v 0 0 v N N V ..... <0 N C") ,... V « a.: 10 ..... 10 ..... ..... ..... N ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... <0 <0 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... <0 N C") Q) E III C <: (!) <: u. ~ c .., Ü ü <: III c C/) <: Q) Q) Q) Q) >. <: >. >'111 >. "C C/) Q) Q) ,g¡ Q) Q) c (/ C :E C) C) .- ~ :E 't: III C) C) :æ 't: III '5 '0 ~ - :2 :E E III - III (/ Q) Q) III 0 ::J 0 ~ C/) ::¡ a. a. 0 C/) <: ~ ~ ...J ...J Q) c E 0 III e C ...J I!! Q) N "C N .::. Q) ~ c ... - Iii 'E <: Q) ... 0 ... E Q) ... Q) õ 'E 'E N .S! III ... "C C ,g¡ >. ... c Õ c - ,g¡ 0 c c ~ Q) ïij III III 0 0 Õ "C ~ .::. ~ ~ ~ - ~ 0 ~ - -~ u. (!) C/) Ü J: 0 .., - Q) := Q) Q) ... E III C) III ... C III ~ u.. UJ ~ 0 0 ~ ~ ... III 0::: Ü (/ (/ UJ Z Q) >. Ü .., .., ... '2 c J: Q) a. c 'Ë ~ u. (!) c c (!) >. ~ >. Q) c Q) Q) I!! .::. c 't: 't: 0 III III .~ .., 0 I!! c "C Q) C c C) ~ 0. C IV C III .¡: .¡: (/ E c C III .::. ~ ~ 'S; 't: 't: ~ Iii .::. IV III .::. UJ UJ .::. - .::. :E :2 0 ::J IV IV .::. 0 .::. ::J ~ 0 0 (/ C III IV 0 IV 0::: UJ ...J 0::: 0 Ü .., Ü ~ ~ C/) < .., UJ UJ .., ::¡ <: (!) ...J .., 0 C/) C/) c.. ...J Q) ~ (/ E - c Q) III ::J (/ C 0 I!! (/ ...J Ü N <: ... .::. Q) Q) c c Q) >< >< "C Q) - 'E ~ ... - I!! ... 0 '0 Iii ... c ... c 0 g ... .¡: .¡: c Q) .c ... Q) 'E "C 'E :;] 'E N Q) :e "fi Q) 0 ::: Q) 'E IV ... E "C "C "C III ~ C " 0 ,g¡ >. ... ...J C ..10: ûj (/ .¡: .¡: "6 c - ,g¡ 0 c c C ...J 0 ~ ::J 0 Q) ïij IV III IV 0 U ::J 'S ãi .c .c ~ 0 Õ "C ~ Q) Q) 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ éi5 ~ ::J Q) < < éi5 ~ 0 Q ~ ~ u. (!) ~ 0 u. .., Z Ü J: 0 J: J: ...J U. "C è!; 8 è!; è!; 0) ,... 10 C") 10 CIO 10 10 III ... CIO <0 ,... è!; ..... è!; C") ..... CIO ,... CIO g ..... N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0::: 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 è!; N 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... 10 CIO 0) ..... ..... 0 ..... <0 ,... 8 ,... CIO ..... 0 ..... ..... ..... ..... 0) 8 N N C") è!; ..... 0 ..... 0 0 0 0 0 0 C") 0 0 0 0 8 0 ..... ..... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ..... N N N N C") C") C") v ..... ..... v v v ..... N N ..... C") V v N ..... C") C") C") ..... 0 Gi ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... N N N N N V ..... ..... C") ..... N N ..... V ..... ..... ..... N 0 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... N 8 ~ C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") co ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 0 III C") C") C") C") C")C") C")C")C")C")C")C") C") C") C") C")C")C")C")C")C")C")C") C") C") C") v 0 a. N N N N NN NNNNNN N N N NNNNNNNN N N N N It> Treasure Coast Newspapers ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA MAY 16,2006 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Sec- tion 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Devel- opment Code and In accordance with the provi- sions of the St" Lucie County Comprehensive Plan that the following applicants have request- ed that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners considers their following re- 1. q~I~~~EL BRYANT for a Change In Zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single-tamll.Y - 2 élu/ac) Zoning District to the AG -1 (Agricultural - 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the fo!lowing de- 13s~~i~r'p~~~e~~T OF S 112 OF SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 LYG ELY OF E R/W I-gs-LESS S 42.5 FT- (5.75' AC) (OR 692-2732). ' . Location: West side of Bennet Road, approxI- mately l,95O feet south of peterson Road. 2. HALF HOUR CUSTOM AUDIO AND ACCESSORIES for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the opera- tion of a Motor Vehicle Repair Service . Body Repair in the CG (Commercial. General) Zoning District for the following descrlbedproperty: ' LEXINGTON SQUARE LOTS 13 AND 14 (1.34 AC) (OR 2051-182). Location: 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie. Florida. 3. SABIN COMPANIES. INC. for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a h.ousehold goods warehousing and storage mini-ware- hOuse facility in the CG (Commercial. General) Zoning District for the following described nftO~n¥~ 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH. RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPTING THE EAST 560.0 FEET, AND, THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR CANAL RIGHT OF WAY AND LESS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TOGETHER WITH: THE WEST 520.0 FEET OF, THE EAST, 560.0 FEET OF THE SOUTH 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHiP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST. ST. LUCIE COUNTY. ì FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 I'EET AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WAY. AND THAT CERTAIN PAR- CEL CONVEYËD TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST., LUCIE COUNTY. FLORI- DA. FILED FOR RECORD. OCTOBER 12. 1988 IN O.R.B. 607, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LU- CIE COUNTY. FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT- ING THAT CERTAIN, PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN a.R.B. 109B, PAGE 1842. AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORI- DA., LESS THE WEST 742.98 FEET (8.9 ACRES) THEREOF. . " ,., Location: North, side of Edwards Road. approxi- mately 250 feet west of South 25th Street. 4. SABIN· COMPANIES. INC for a Change In Zoning from the RS - 4 (Residential, Single-Family - " du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Orchid Place) Zoning Dis- trict and Preliminary Planned Development Site 'Plan Approval for the following described prop- erty: THE WEST 742.98 FEET (8.9 ACRES) OF THE FOL- LOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: THE SOUTH 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 bF SECTION 20. TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA, LESS AND EX- CEPTlNGTHE EAST 560.0 FEET. AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND LESS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TO- GETHER WITH: ' THE WEST 520.0 FEET OF THE EAST 560.0 FEET OF THE SOUTH 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 Of SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 FEET AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WAY AND THE CERTAIN PAR- CEL CONVEYED TO THE BOARD Of COUNTY COMMISSiONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORI- DA. FILED FOR RECORD, OCTOBER 12. 1988 IN O. R. B. 607. PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LU- CIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT- ING THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN O.R.B. 1098. PAGE 1842. AS RECORDED IN THE PUBllC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORI- Lo~~iion: North side of Edwards Road, apprmci- mately 650 feet west of SOuth 25th Street. Tuesday, May 2. 2006 5. TAILERS' COVE DEVELOPMENT, LLC for a Change in Zoning from the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development . Tailers' Cove) Zon- Ing District. and Preliminary and Final Planned , Development Site Plan Approval for the follow- Ing described property: THE NORTH 400 FEET OF PARCEL G, F.E. ENGLER'S PLAT OF SURVEY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, AT PAGE 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS, OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING WEST OF STATE ROAD A+A. ' Location: West side of South SR A-l-A, directly across from Atlantis I Condomlnlúms 6. CHARLES AND PEGGY WARD for a Change in Zoning from the RS -2 (Residential, Single-Fami- ly -2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AR - 1 (Agr- Icultural. Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the following described property: 13 35S 39E 13 ,35 39 N 1/2 OF N 1/2 OF S 112 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 -LESS W 2 AC OF SD N 112 OF S 112 OF NE 1/4 OF HE 1/4 AND LESS E 550.01 FT . (1.92 AC) (OR 1000·81: 1005-2109: 1204-1397) 13 35S 39E 13 35 39 W 510.01 FT Of E 550.01FT OF N 1/2 OF N 112 OF S 1/2 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 (1.93 AC) (OR 528-1343.1344: 1017-2312: 1204-1398) Location: 1245 South Jenkins Road, Fort Pierce. Florida. 7. JOHN WÀRD for a Change In Zoning from the RS -2 (Residential. Slngle-Famil'y - 2 da/ac) Zon- Ing District to the AR - 1 (Agricultural, Residen· tlal - 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the following described Jro:lerty:, ' THE PARCEL CONTAINED WITHIN: THE SOUTH. 112 OF THE NORTH 112 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF TFlE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THE WEST 2 ACRES OF THE SAID NORTH 112 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SEC- TION 13, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ALSO LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM. ROAD RIGHT - OF -WAY. ' Location: 1275 South Jenkins Road, Fort Pierce, Florida. .' The PUBLIC HEARING on this Item will be held In the Commission Chambers, Roger Poitras An- nex, 3rd Floor, St. Lucie County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Flori- da on May 16, 2006. beginning at 6:00 P.M. or as soon therEiafter as possible. Action can be tak- en at this meetlngj or the item can be continued to a future date ana time. All interested persons will be gillen an opportunl-. ty to be heard. Written comments received In àdvance of the public, hearing will also be con- sidered. Written comments to the Board of County Commissioners should be received by the Growth Management ~artmerit -. Planning Division at least 3 da)'s prior to ,the, scheduled hearing. . The petition file is available for review at the Growth Management Department offices located at 2300 Virginia Avenue. Fort Pierce, Florida. Please calf 772/462-2822 if you have any questions or regulre additional Information. The file for this project may be inspected prior to the hearing date In the Growth Management Department. 2300 Virginia Avenue; 2nd Floor. Fort Pierce Florida., ' , Th, II St., Lucie County Board of County Commls- 'sloners has the power to review and grant any applications within their area of responsibility. The proceedings of the Board of County Commis- sioners are electronically recorded. PURSUANT TO, Section 286.0105. Florida Statutes. if a person , decides to appeal an)' decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing. he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to, ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record Includes the testlmon)' and evi- dence upon which the appeal Is to be, based. Upon the request of any party to the proceed- Ing. individuals testifying during a hearing w!1I be sworn In. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an oPlJortunlty to cross-examine any Individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If It becomes necessary, a public hear- Ing may be continued from time to tIme as may be necessary to a date-certain. , AnYOne, with a disability re, qulring accommoda- tion to attend this meetln~ should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least fortY-eight (48) hours :Irlor to the meet- Ing at 772/462-1m orT.D.D. 772/462-1428. ' BoARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA IS! DOUG COWARD, CHAIRMAN PUBLISH DATE: May 2, 2006 Publish: May 2. 2006 ' 1384761 .... ,~ To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: ,,_ COMMISSION ACTION: CXJ APPROVED r=J OTHER County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Agenda Request Item Number Date: 5H 05116106 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ) [ ) [ ) [ X ) Quasi-JD [ X ] , Presented By -JJp Î;;'b ~ rowth anagement Director Consider Draft Resolution 06-154 granting a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 dulae) Zoning District to the AG-1 (Agricultural ~ 1 dulac) Zoning District for property located on the west side of Bennett Road, approximately 1,950 feet south of Peterson Road. Board of County Commissioners Growth Management The Petitioner, Michael Bryant, has reQuested a Change in Zoning from the R5-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 dulac) Zoning District to the AG-1 (Agricultural- 1 dulac) Zoning óistrict for property located on the west· side of Bennett Road, approximately 1,950 feet south of Peterson Road. (File No: RZ-06-012) NlA At the April 20, 2006, public hearing on this matter, the SI. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to Q, with three members (Mr. Lounds, Mr. Trias and Mr. Knapp) absent, recommended approval of the requested change in zoning with the understanding from testimony by the applicant that the owner of the property will ŸoIuntarily restrict the use of the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 dulac) Zoning District through a deed restriction. Deny Draft Resolution 06-154, for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 dulac) Zoning District to the' AG-t (Agricultural - dulac) Zoning District. Stàff reconvnends denial of AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 dulac) Zor1ing District with recommendation of rezoning to the AR-1 (Agricuftural, Residential - 1 dulae) Zoning District. c=J DENIED Approved 5-0 Motion to deny staff recommendation and approve Change in zoning to AG-1 Zoning District. Jd'" Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Environn1ental Res. Div.: Public Works: 7NCE _ L~ t.l ArKtefson County Administrator Purchasing: Road and Bridge: Other: Transmittal Master Checklist Primary Distribution Sent Received Environmental Resources Department, Amy Mott: N/A Public Works Surveyor - Ron Harris: N/A Road, Bridge, & Transportation N/A - Scott Herring: Stormwater Management N/A - Chris Lestrange: General Engineering - Kyle Croce: N/A Zoning Supervisor - Paula Bushby: N/A Attorney Prop Acquisition - JoAnn Riley: N/A Sheriffs Department - Major Monahan: N/A St Lucie CountyFire District - Captain Derek Foxx: N/A Ft Pierce FarmslNorth St Lucie Water Control District N/A - Ray Garcia: Property Appraiser's Office - Maurice Snyder: N/A IF AS - Jeffrey Gellermann: N/A Residential Onlv School Board of StLucie County - Marty Sanders: N/A Community Services (Transit) - Jody Bonet: N/A Geoe:raphical Based St Lucie County Utility Department - Mike Bowers: N/A Airport Authority - Diana Lewis: N/A City ofFt Pierce - Beach/Recor: N/A 3/28/06 City of Port St Lucie - Cheryl Friend: N/A Ft Pierce Utilities Authority - David Mellert: N/A Education and Research Authority - Jane Bachelor: N/A " Board of County Commission Review: 05/16/06 GROWTH MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT Planning Division MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: Board of County Commissioners Bob Nix, AICP - Growth Managemen! Director ~ ~ Hank Flores, P~anning Manager ~ THROUGH: DATE: May 10, 2006 SUBJECT: Application of Michael Bryant, for a Change in Zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family ~ 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AG-1 (Agricultural- 1 du/ac) Zoning District. LOCATION: The subject parcel is located on the west side of Bennett Road, 1,950 feet south of Peterson Road. EXISTING ZONING: RS-2 (Residential, Single·Family - 2 du/ac) PROPOSED ZONING: AG-1 (Agricultural- 1 du/ac) RU (Residential Urban) FUTURE LAND USE: PARCEL SIZE: 5.75 acres PROPOSED USE: The purpose of the requested change in zoning is to allow horse boarding for the petitioner's horses. PERMITTED USES: Sèction 3.01.03(A), AG·1 (Aaricultural -1) identifies the designated uses, which are permitted by right, permitted as accessory uses, or permitted through the .conditional use process in the AG..;1 (Agricultural -1) Zoning District. Any use designated as a "Conditional Use" is required to undergo further review and approval before that use may be commenced on the property. Any use not identified in the zoning district regu~ations is considered to be a prohibited use in that district (see Attachment "A"). SURROUNDING ZONING: The petitioned property abuts Interstate 95 Highway on the west. The RS-2 (Residential, Single·Family - 2 dU/ac) Zoning District is adjacent to the north. The North St. Lucie River Water Management District Canal No. 36 is adjacent to the south and the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District abutting the canal. The property located on the east side of the subject May 1 0, 2006 Page 2 Subject: Michael Bryant File No.: RZ-06-012 property is the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/ac) Zoning District. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The existing uses to the north and south arelargè residential lots. The property to the east is an existing nursery called Odom's Ç>rchids. The Future Land Use Designation of the surrounding area is RU (Residential Urban) to the north, south, and east. The Interstate 95 Highway is adjacent to the subject property on the west. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #1 (2400 Rhode Island Avenue) is located approximately 5 miles to t~e east. The subject properties are located within the service area of Fort Pierce Utilities Authority. UTILITY SERVICE: TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT -OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way, width of Bennett Road varies from 30 feet to 75 feet wide. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: None scheduled. Concurrency Deferral Affidavit. ********************************************************************* STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Board of County Commissioners shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed zoning district is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and has met the standards of 11.06.03. 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The subject property is located within an area designated as RU (Residential Urban) on the Future Land Use Map. The rezoning request is compatible with the RU (Residential May 10, 2006 Page 3 Subject: Michael Bryant File No.: RZ-06-012 Urban) Future Land Use classification. The RU (Residential Urban) classification is the predominant residential land use category. The RU designation is generally found betwe~n the identified urban service areas and the transitional RS areas. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/ac) Zoning District may be consistent with the existing residential and agricultural character of the surrounding area. Mr. Bryant's intended purpose of requesting the rezoning of the subject property is to lease the property from the owner in order to allow horse boarding consistent with the existing residential and agricultural character ofthe immediate area. Several approved and proposed residential developments are located in the area; to the east is Celebration Pointe' consisting of 755 residential units, Whispering Oaks consisting of 374 residential units, Bent Creek consisting of 692 residential units, Brookside consisting - of 168 residential units and San Michelle consisting of 202- residential·units and 111,000 square feet of industrial. In addition to projects located in the, unincorporated area, are several projects propose'd in the city limits of Fort Pierce. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; Conditions have not changed so as to require an amendment. 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportati9n facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, änd emergency medicaffacilities; The intended use for this rezoning is not expected to create additional demands on any public facilities. Any development will need to demonstrate that there are adequate public facilities in the area to support such development. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create significant adverse impacts on the natural environment. The property is currently vacant. Any future development of the . site will be required to comply with all state and local environmental regulations. 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; The applicant's intended purpose to utilize the property with horse boarding and grazing is not compatible with the existing uses in the surrounding area. The AG-1 Zoning District may allow for a variety of other types of productive agricultural uses that may be less compatible with the proposed residential development on the east side of South Jenkins Road. May 10, 2006 Page 4 Subject: Michael Bryant File No.: RZ-œ-D12 The property directly east was recently rezoned to the AG-1 Zoning District to allow for the expansion of an existing plant nursery known as Odom's Orchids. Some of the uses allowed in the AG-1 Zoning District that may be incompatible with the proposed residential uses in the area are Agricultural production - livestock & animal specialties which include but not limited to cattle ranches, hog farms, chicken farms, and kennels. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in hannony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The applicant is proposing to use this property for the boarding and grazing of his horses. The proposed AG-1 Zoning District allows for a variety of agricultural, uses such as livestock and animal production, kennels and other productive commercial agricùlture uses as listed in Section 3.01.03 (A)(2). These uses are - not compatible with the pr!)posed residential developments in the area. - COMMENTS The petitioner, Michael Bryant, has requested this'change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AG-1 (Agricultural -1 du/ac) Zoning- District for property located on the west side of Bennett Road, 1,950 feet south of .Peterson Road in order to lease the property and to allow the grazing of his personal horses. Michael Bryant,resides at 6391 Peterson Road located approximately 1,000 feet north of the subject property. The existing uses to the north an~ south are large residential lots. To the east is Odom's Orchids plant nursery. Several approved and proposed residential developments are located to the east of South Jenkins Road. They are as follows: Celebration Pointe consisting of 755 units, Whispering Oaks 374 residential units, Bent Creek 692 residential units, Brookside proposed for 168 residential units and San Michelle consisting of 202 residential. units and 111,000 square feet of industrial/commercial space . Thè subject proþerty is located in an area which is currently utilizèd for residential and some limited agricultural uses. Even though the property is located within the- urban service boundary and the Comprehensive Plan discourages the location of Agricultural zoning in the urban service boundary, several properties in the area have been rezoned to the AG-1 Zoning District recently. While these rezonings have previously, been determined to be consistent with the existing development patterns of the area, they are not entirely consistent with the Comprehensive Plan designations for the future of the area and are not consistent with the approved and proposed residential projects in the area. Staff believes that the existing RS-2 (Residential, Single Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District, which does not allow for agricultural uses, is the most appropriate zoning district designation for the subject property and the surrounding area. The residential development pattern in the area may conflict with the permitted uses of the AG-1 (Agricultural- 1 du/ac) Zoning District. Attached is a copy of Section 3.01.03(A) - AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/ac) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, which delineates the permitted, accessory, and conditional uses allowed in the zoning districts. Staff recommends denial of the AG-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District and recommends the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential- 1 du/ac) Zoning District that would allow, as May 10, 2006 Page 5 Subject: Michael Bryant File No.: RZ-06~012 an accessory use, animals (other than domestic pets), which may be kept provided they are not housed within one hundred (100) feet of any property line. The subject property is vacant and if a change in zoning to AR-1 is approved, the accessory use would only be allowed after a permitted use was placed on the property At the April 20, 2006, meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission meeting, Mr. Hearn voiced concerns about the other uses allowed in the AG-1 (Agricultural- 1 du/ac) Zoning District. Mr. Bryant stated that he would only be boarding four horses on the subject property. Bob Nix, Director of Growth Management, stated that a rezoning cannot have conditions placed on it, however if the owner of the property volunteered to restrict the use of the property, a legally binding document could be written to restrict the uses. The document would need to be prepared by the applicant's attorney. To date no voluntary restriction has been drafted or proposed for the property. At the April 20, 2006, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0, with three members (Mr. Lounds, Mr. Trias and Mr. Knapp) absent, recommended approval of the requested change in zoning from the RS-2 Zoning District to the AG-1 Zoning District. . Staff has reviewed this petition under the current zoning entitlements and determined that it does not conform to the standards of review às set forth in the St. Lucie County Land : Development Code and is in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff believes that the approved and proposed developments in the area and the specific conditions of the subject property do not create a suitable environment for the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/ac) Zoning District. Attached is Draft Resolution No. 06-154, which if approved would grant a change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 ,du/ac) Zoning District. . Staff recommends denial of Draft Resolution 06-154. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. SUBMITTED Bob Nix, AICP Growth Management Director lap cc: Michael Bryant Michael and Rosina Bencivenga File RESOLUTION NO. 06-154 FILE NO.: RZ.Q6.Q12 1 2 3 4 5 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM 6 THE RS-2 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMilY - 2 DU/ACRE) 7 ZONING DISTRICT TO THE AG-1 (AGRICULTURAL - 1 8 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IN 9 ST. lUCIE COUNTY, FLORiDA 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: " 1. Michael Brvant. presented a petition for a change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AG-f (Agricultural - 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the property depicted on the attached maps as Exhibit "A" and described below. 2. On April 20, 2006, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County CommissionerS approve a change in zoning from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/ac) Zoning District. 3. On May 16, 2006, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 4. The proposed change in zoning has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code and is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 5. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the existing and proposed use of property in the surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. The proposed Change in the Zoning District Classification from the RS-2 (Residential, Single-Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AG-1 (Agricultural - 1 du/ac) Zoning File No.: RZ-06-012 May 16, 2006 Resolution No. 06-154 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 District for that property depicted on the attached maps as Exhibit "A" and described as follows: 13 3539 THAT PART OF SOUTH % OF SOUTHWEST Y4 OF NORTHEAST y,. L YG EL Y OF EAST RIW 1..95 - LESS SOUTH 42.5 FT - (5.75 AC) Property Tax ID#2313..134.. 0001-000/6 (Location: West side of Bennett Road, approximately 1,950 feet south of Peterson Road.) owned by, Michael Bencivenga and Rosina Bencivenga, is hereby approved. B. The S1. Lucie County Growth Management Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the change to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resólution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward XXX Vice-Chairman Chris Craft XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX Commissioner Joseph E. Smith XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 16th Day of April, 2006. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: ' Deputy Clerk County Attorney lap H:\WORD\PLANN ING\REZON ING\2313-134-000 1-0006 resolution.doc File No.: RZ~06-012 May 16, 2006 Resolution No. 06-154 Page 2 1 Exhibit A 2 3 4 Maps 5 6 7 . Ge~eral Location Map., . Area Subject to the Change in Zoning 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 File No.: RZ-06-012 May 16, 2006 Resolution 06-_ Page 3 as C) c: (1) > 'õ c: (1) m as c: ë;) o a:: '"C c: as ã) as .r. .~ ~ .~ ~ i ,;)1 j~ d 'q~ ~! N "II"'"" o I CO o N a:: .t\, 0<>& ~ " 0 0 ¡¡ .l: 0:: IC: ~ ow =ä I i .E I ~ .... - ¡ . 3 ....... .. ..-.. ow> .." i f AJunCY.) eeqolp8Ø)() :g o N Ö .... ~ 1\1 :E '1:J GI i I!! 0. 0. 1\1 :E >- ë " 8 IC: :c ow ~ ~ A ó A petition of Michael and Jsina Bencivenga for a Cha je in Zoning from RS-2 (Residential, Single Family - 2 du/ac) Zoning District to the AG-1 (Agricultural, 1) Zoning District \ \ \ \ I I 1\ 0 a: \ ~ \ \ ~ L ~ ~ w z ~ z \ w I \ ~ a::I {\'\ 'fl, \ \ '\ \ \ -, \ ~ 0 \ a: a: w ..' ~ J: . Z W c.. 0 ü I \ \" NSLRDD CANAL NO. 36 NSLRDD CANAL NO. 36 SAMBA ST ~c: ~ J: It) 0) w -1 ~ - ~ - a: w ~ \ ~ - - RZ 06-012 Legend 9:-.Á~ ~~_ N A (jr_ui .JItlZ7UllJewumr oep;zrrwumr ~ Subject property Map prepared March 10,2006 Zoning Michael and Rosina Bencivenga . \ \ \ \ RS-2 \ \ . 0 ~ \ ~ \ \ ¡: L A ~ W Z ~ Z , w \ \ ~ a) ¡1\ <Ø 2 (J\ RS , \ ~ RS-2 \ ' _....- ~~-£ , .6.~_1 0 . ~ ~ w ~ J: . Z W c- o ü I NSLRDD CANAL NO. 36 NSLRDD CANAL NO. 3& J RS4 SAMBA ST ...." A . ,. . ~c RS-2 AR-1 RS-2 >- ;: J: It) 0) w J. !cë RS-2 ~ -----, ~ W I- ~ . , ' co RZ 06~O12 Legend 5è- ~~~~___ N fir_Iii .ManI6ement :O~17ftI7II A ~ Subject property Map prepared March 10, 2006 Updated April 13, 2006 Land Use RU ! SAMBA ST ~c RU Michael and Rosina Bencivenga , \ ~ \ \ \ \ ..... . , r"U o c:: c:: w ~ :I: Z W c- o Ü -:- \ \ , I NSLRDD CANAL NO. 36 '- . RU 1 ~ - RZ 06-012 Legend \ . < . ~ - >- 3: :I: 10 0) W ~ ~ c:: W t- ~ .. ~ Subject property í o c:: ¡: w z z w CD -L KU , NSLRDD CANAL NO. 36 RL \ N Map prepared March 10,2006 A. 5è.;L~ ~~_ {jrtrWtli .NIZNI/J_t OeJHZ""Þrrnú Michael and Rosina Bencivenga RZ·06-012 Legend ~ Subject property i:;:'t.,.¡~-,-- (irdwffi :Hldntltf.mtt!fd 7J9drt'meHr N Â Map prepared March 10,2006 Roll Call Ms. Hammer - Yes to approve Ms. Morgan - Yes Ms. Caron - Yes Mr. Grande - No Mr. Mundt - No Chainnan Hearn - Yes 4 - 2 to approve Change in Zoning Agenda Item #4: Sabin Companies. Inc. Andrew Riddle, Planner, petition of Sabin. Companies, Inc. for a Conditional Use Pennit to allow for the construction and operation of a hoùsehold goods warehousi d storage mini-warehousfng in the Commercial General Zoning District. The property has 4. s and is located on the North side of Edwards Road approximately 250 ft West of South 2 . Staff recommends that this petition be forwarded to the Board of County Commissio ommendation of approval. Mr. Hearn asked ifthere were any questions for the Chainnan Hearn opened the public hearing. Seeing no-o Ms. Caron stated regarding the opaque fence i Charlie Sabin stated there are openings betwee between these openings. Mr. Dobbi ted ther will not be impacting the traffic. of serv oning Commission recommend that approval be ies, c. for Conditional Use Pennit to allow for the ods warehousing and storage mini warehouse in the . ct cause it is consistent with the surrounding community e inftastructure caused by Orchid Place. This motion has been RollCall Mr. Grande - Yes to approve Mr. Mundt - Yes Ms. Hammer - Yes to the motion except for the part about the strain on the community. Ms. Morgan - Yes Ms. Caron - Yes Chainnan Hearn - Yes Unanimously approved for the Conditional Use Pennit. 11 Agenda Item #6: Michael Bryant: Linda Pendarvis, Planner, this is a petition of Michael Bryant's request for a Change in Zoning ftom RS-2 Zoning District to the AG-l Zoning Districtfor property located on the West side of Bennet Road, 1950 ft South of Peterson Road to allow for the grazing of his personal horses. Michael 7 Bryant resides at 6391 Peterson Road, located approximately 1000 ft North from the subject property. The subject property is located in an area which is currently utilized for residential and some limited agricultural uses. Several properties in the area have been rezoned to the AG-l zoning district recently. Staff believes that the existing RS-2 Residential Single Family 2 dwelling units per acre Zoning district is the most appropriate Zoning district designation for the subject property. An alternative Zoning of AR-l which is Agricultural Residential one dwelling unit per acre would allow as an accepted use animals other than domestic pets which may be kept provided' they are not housed within 100 feet of any property line. The subject property is vacant and a change of Zoning to AR-l is approved. Accepted use would be allowed after residential permitted use was placed on the property, Staff believes that the approved and proposed developments in the area and tl1e specific conditions ofthe subject do not create a suitable environment for the AG-l dwelling unit per acre Zoning district. Staff recommends that this board forward a recommendation of denial for the AG-l Zoning district with the consideration of AR-l Agricultural Residential one dwelling unit per acre Zoning district. Mr. Grande stated since there is no residence and the applic the property, his desire to put two horses on this property 0 d no recommendation is followed. Linda Pendarvis stated th applican He would lease the property and board his horses. ot plan.to put a residence on et, ifthe staff s s not own the property. his horses for convenience on this orses would keep some s on the property instead of Chairman Hearn stated if the zo ged to G-l, it could be used for a lot of different things and that is the only res Nix sta at in the past applicants have volunteered to restrict the use of their property i a re-zoning. Will the applicant agree to volunteer to restnct the is proposing or to a small set of uses that this commission knows will not be h ul to a a. Mr. Bryant stated the use would be restricted to boarding four hors the own oul agree to th,is limitation with a ba.I'q. Mr. Nix stated that a document would have t create the applicant's attorney would create a document which would be reviewed by the ty' egal department to determine if the County wants to pursue this type of approach and if s s petition could be moved forward. Chairman Hearn will open the public Hearing. Wade Tindel, resident of the bordering property. He and twenty-three others are in agreement with the applicant with regard to re-zoning AR-l. The public hearing is closed. Mr. Grande made a motion that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that approval be granted to the applicant, Michael Bryant for a Change In Zoning from RS-2 Zoning to the AG-l because it is consistent with the rest of the neighborhood and would be a significant benefit to the community. Ms. Caron seconded the motion. Mr. Byrant has voluntarily agreed to restrict the use of the property to-the barn and boarding of four horses via a voluntary restrictive property use agreement whiçh will be put forward by the applicant for approval by the County legal dept before 8 the Board of County Commissioners hears the petition. Mr. Grande stated he will amend his motion to include that verbiage. Ms. Caron seconded the amended motion. Roll Call Mr. Grande - Yes to approve Ms. Caron....:. Yes Ms. Hammer - Yes Ms. Morgan - Yes Mr. Mundt - Yes Chainnan Hearn - Yes Unanimously approved. Mr. Nix advised that applicant or his representative contact him re agreement. ustom Audio and of a motor vehicle This b mess is located at 6900 te a custom painting facility that op. Approval of this aIled within the existing building. A enda Item #7: Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessori Linda Pendarvis, Planner, petition of Aaron Sevella, 0 Accessories, Inc. request for a Conditional Use Pe repair service-body repair in the SG Commercial Z Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie. The applicant proposes to requires a paint booth in addition to an existi ustom acce Conditional Use will allow the applicant to ha . 't booth Chainnan Hearn 8tatedhe·had conc Commercial General Zoning di on the proposed activity and further stated that this board can Linda stated that the ap . which does not inclu auto bo S81 oise from a body shop in the . s stated that the fire district has not signed off to go through a pennitting process. She al use, if it becomes a nuisance to the public. custom paint facility to an existing auto business Aaron Savella, Owner, tom Audio and Accessories stated he is interested in doing custom graphics. He did n paint facility, however, he is attempting to put in additional safe guards for the environm d the surrounding neighborhood. The work he does on his site is audio and accessories work, b oy tints, perfonnance parts, wheels, tires, stereo equipment, etc. Mr: Savella stated the paint booth has filters on the intake and within paint booth and filters on the outgoing to collect particles. There are minimal fumes escapi~g in the air. The unit falls within the all of the EP A Safety regulations. Chainnan Hearn will open the public hearing. Ed Boslow, 4 Sandberg Lane approximately 650 ft away from this business. He states the aut'O repair noise, guns that take tires off, etc is absolutely terrible. If this petition is approved and this business adds the repair of bumpers, dents, front ends, etc. this would be opening up a can of wonns. There is enough noise now without allowing the operation of sailders that produce that high pitched noise and other loud machinery that the approval of this petition would allow. Please do not approve this petition. Lighting at night from these businesses is offensive to some of the residents. 9 3.01.03 ZONING DISTRICTS A. AG-1 AGRICUL TURAl- 1 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for productive commercial agriculture, together with such other uses as may be necessary to and compatible with' productive agricultural surroundings. Residential densities are restricted to a maximum of one (1) dwelling unit per gross acre. The number in ·0· following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(8). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this Code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Agricultural production - crops (01) b. Agricultural production - livestock & anirnal specialties (02) c. Agricultural services (07) d. Family day care homes. (999) " , ,.' , e. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located"withln a radius of one thousand (1,000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that thø sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) notifies the Board of CQuntyCommissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. (999) 1. Fishing, hunting & trapping (09) g. Forestry (08) h. Kennels. (0752) i. Research Facilities, Noncommercial (8733) j. Riding stables. (7999) , k. . Single-family detached dwellings. (999) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. 5. Off·street Parking and LoadÎl1g Requirements . Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. 6. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00. 7. Conditional Uses a. Agricultural labor housing. (999) b. Aircraft storage and equipment maintenance. (4511) c. Airports and flying, landing, and takeoff fields. (4511) S. Lucie CounIy Land Dtlvelopment Code Adopted AugUst '. 1990 ..,' '3-5 Revislicl Through ci5lts.ì04 d. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1,000) feet of another such family residential home. (999) e. Farm products warehousing and storage. (4221/4222) f. Gasoline service sta~ions. (5541) g. Industrial wastewater disposal. (999) h. Manufacturing: (1) Agricultural chemicals (287) (2) Food & kindred products C20) . (3) Lumber & wood products, except furniture (2") i. Mining and quarrying of nonmetalic minerals, exceptfuels. (1") j. Retail trade: (1) Farm equipment and related accessories. (999) (2) Apparel & accessory stores. (56) k. Sewage disposal subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.13. (999) I. . Telecommunication Towers -subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999) m. Camps - sporting and recreational. (7002) 8. Accessory Uses Accessory u~es are. subject to the requirements of Section B.OO.OO, and include the following: a. Mobile homes subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.05. b. Retail trade and wholesale trade - subordinate to the primary authorized use or activity. c. Guest house subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.04. (999) Sl LucIe CounIy Land D..eIopmenI Code AdapIId August 1, 1990 3-6 : RevIsed ThrOugh 05115104 E. AR-1 1. Purpose AGRICULTURAL. RESIDENTIAL - 1 The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for single-family dwellings at a maximum density of one (1) dwelling unit per gross acre, together with such other uses as m¡,¡y be necessary for and compatible with very low density rural residential surroundings. The number in -0- following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code ref~rence described in Section 3.01.02(8). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Family day care homes. (999) b. Family residential homes provided that such homes. shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1 000) feet of ~nother existing such family residential home and provided that the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Àehabilitativ~ Services (HRS) notifies the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. (999) , c. Single-family detached dwellings. C999) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.0~.00., 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking Requirements Off-street parking requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.06.00. 6. Conditional Uses a. b. Crop services (072) .. Family residential homeS located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of another such family residential home. (999) Industrial wastewater disposal. (a99) . Kennels, - completely enclosed. (0752) Landscaping & horticultural services (078) Retail: (1) Fruits and Vegetables. (543) Riding stables. (7999) Veterinary services. (074) Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999) c. d. e. f. - g. h. i' 7. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following: a. Agriculture (farms and ranches accessory to single-family detached dwelling). (01102) . Sl lucie CounIy Land De\.eIopmenI Code Adopted August 1. 1990 3-12 - Revised Through 05115104 b. Animals, subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.03. (999) c. Guest house subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.04. (999) d. Mobile Home subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.05. (999) e. Retail and wholesale trade - subordinate to the primary authorized use or activity. ,> --:"!-":: ." ~" '. . ,;. St. lucie CounIy LanØ.DeveIopmenI Code AdopIId August 1. 19!1O 3-13 R8visèd."ßirough 05f1 SJ04 7.10.03 ANIMALS IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS A. Except as provided in this Section, no animals shall be kept in any residential district exëept those animals generally recognized as household domestic pets, such as dogs, cats, caged birds, etc. In any residential district, no more than a total of three (3) dogs and/or cats four (4) months or older shall be allowed for each dwelling unit. B. In the AR-1 district, animals other than household domestic pets may be kept provided they are not housed within one hundred (100) feet of any property line. C. In the RE-1 and RE-2 districts, horses may be kept provided that: 1. The property is at least two (2) acres; 2. No mOfe than two (2) horses are kept; 3. The horses are for the private and personal use of the resident and his fami~y; and, 4. The horses are to be stabled at least one hundred and fifty (150) feet from any residence under separate ownership and three hundred (300) feet from the edge of the right-of-way of any street. . Sl lucie County Land DewIopmenI Code Adopted August 1. 1990 7 - 135 RevÌsIIcI TtwouOh 05115104 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS - GROWTH MANAGEMENT Apri127, 2006 Joe Smith 1800 Anywhere DR. Anywhere, FL 34982 USA In accordance with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, you are hereby advised that Michael Bryant has petitioned St. Lucie County for a Change in Zoning &om the RS __ 2 (Residential, Single ~ Family _ 2 dulac) Zoning District to the AG - 1 (Agricultural - 1 dulac) Zoning District for the following described property: Location: West side of Bennet Road, approximately 1,950 feet south of Peterson Road. THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS A V AllABLE UPON REQUEST The second public hearing on the petition will be held at 6:00 P.M., or as soon thereofter as possible, on May 16, 2006, County Commissioner's Chambers, St Lucie County Administration Building Anna, 2300 VlI1fÍnia Ave""e, Fort Pierce, Florida. All interested persons will be given an opportunity to be heard at that time. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. The County Planning Division should receive written comments to the Board of County Commissioners at least J days prior to a scheduled hearing. County policy strongly encourages your input and commerit at public hearing of this matter before the Planning and Zoning Commission and County Commission, rather than by contact outside of the scheduled public hearing(s). We encourage you to speak at these public hearings. or provide written comments for the record. The proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, , he will need "a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date-certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parœl, please forward, this notice to the new owner. Please call (772) 462-2822 if you have any questions, and refer to: File Number: RZ 06-012. Sincerely, ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Doug Coward, Chairman JOSEPH E. SMITH, District No.1. DOUG COWARD, District No, 2 . PAULA A. LEWIS, Distrièt No, 3. FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District No.4 · CHRIS CRAFT, District No.5 County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson Website: www.co.st-lucie.fI.us 2300 Virginia Avenue - Fort Pierce. FL. 34982-5652 Administration: (772) 462-1590 Planning: (712) 462-2822 GISlTechnical Services: (772) 462-2822 FAX: (772) 462-1581 Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 FAX: (772) 462-1579 Tourist Development: (772) 462-1535 1 (800) 344- TGIF FAX: (772) 462-2132 N .... o I (Q(Q 00 ~~ ~,.. nI.s::. ClU c ... ~nI .- ~ U nI c_ CII nI m"C nI ... C CII .- (II (II .- o e 0::11 05: =~ .s::.CII .~ 11 ~~ ...0.. .Eg g'... .- - iii"C .- CII - 'C OCII o..~ ceo 0) I'- o '<t NNNo)l'-NNMM ~~M~~ 0) M....MNO) MM~MOMM~~ NNMNN ~ ~~~~~ ~~~~~~~gM ~~~~~ g MM ~ I I I I T 1 1 I I T 1 I 1 1 I I I I NN....~I'-I'-I'-~~~I'-I'-NI'-I'-~~~I'-I'-I'-~~~NNN~~ .... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ i:513 "fi ItI ItI ItI CII CII CII CII .s::. .- CD CD CD ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ê ~ ~ ~ .~ ê ê ê ê ~ 3 ê ~ 0 0 0 ê .~ .~.~ .~.~.~ .~.~ .~.~ ·~Æ·~·~·~·~·~·~ .~.~ _.~.~ æ æ æ.~ o..o..o..Cllo..o..o..o..o..o..~o.. 0..0..0..0..0..0..0..0..000..0..1111110.. ~tttSttttttttetttttttttttEEEt õ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~&~~&&&~ CII ¡;; ~'E~~ '- Q) ... ~ CII"CCIICII .- ~.-.- 0..1tI0..0.. t~tt 0...00 ~~~~ ~ ~ ItI 00 ~~o ~ >~~ ~~_ ~ O::O::O::~"C ~"C~"CO:: ~uo::o:: o::o::~~ ~,~,~- ~~~~~ ~~ ~~ ~ ~~CIICIICII~~U ~ wW~~~~~CIICIICII~~ ~~O::~CII~~~CllCllCII»>CIICII~O::o:: 330 0::0::0::»>00-0000>0::0::0~»«««»ECII0 "c~ ItIltIltIcco..ccccltl c~ltI~ ItIItI Cc ItI ItI .- 0 E E E .s::. .s::. .s::. .- .- .-.-.-.-.s::. ~ ~ .- !tI .s::. .s::. .s::. .s::. .s::. .s::. .s::. E .- 0 ~~!-!tI!tIItICCC!!£!!!!CCIICII!Œcc~~~cco~~ --CII.s::..s::..s::..s::.CII~CIICIICIINCllCllCllCllCllccCII I~CIINNNCllCIIUCIICII (gg~~~~~~o~~~""~~~~~~~~~I~~WWW~~ ~~ ~»oo....øøøUUUoooo~ooooooooUCDCDooooUUZZZUU~ooo.. OO....O~O~ONO........ ................o~~....-ooooo~oo...._ "COONOI'-OI'-'<t~N""""O""""""""~I'-I'-....'<t~~NNNN'<tONo) ~MMI'-No)OO~~I'-~~I'-~~~~"''<t'<t~N~'<tNNN~~'<t'''M 'NNN~~m~~~~~~v~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~MNm CII E nI C u.. ~ CII C ~ ~- « ~c 1tI~ c CII ~ > WW ooooZoooooooo :¡¡: CII CII C CII CII CII CII Qj ItI .~ .~ ItI .~ .~ .~ .~ "fi > ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~. !tI iIi.3.35.3.3.3.30:: 00 CII!tI U' CII ltI·c CII ItI !tI !tI .- 0.s::.0~CCCCII .- t ........- !E <;::: <;::: U 5It1æ~CIIQjQj~ ~:¡¡::¡¡:«OOO~ ItI C 'ii) o _ ._ 0:: CII E nI C ..J t! CII c ~ o c >- ~.S! ~ - U !tI 1tI.s::. ~oo C !tI!tI æ t::!EE~EEEE.5 [ 0 0 ~ 0 0 o· 0 '* o ~ ~ O·~ ~ ~ ~ ~ WOOI-OOCOI- ~ 00 W N ~ ~ CII~ CII ~. E ~ .g ~ 8 8 8 ~ ocE-c'cc~ ~O!tle.!!!.!!!.!!!E OØJ:I-CDCDCDoo ItI C) C CII .~ U C CII CD CII E nI C u.. '. ~J: 0 0:: . 0:: U ~'Erwoo~øØ~ØØØØ00..0..Ø o..~a~&~w .s::.~~~ -Ec~~ccccCII~jc-~c~~_", ~~s~tj«~~~~~~~~~~~~!tI~¡¡i~§ ~wOOJ:O::~~~~v~~~~~o::o::~o::øo»>ø~ Qj ItI .s::. U ~ .... ... CII C ~ o C) ~ ~~ ~ :§ nI~~ 00 ~ coo !tI 00 W 0 ..Juüo~~ æ ~~~ N ~ ~ 0..0 ~~.uCII~~g>-~1tI E ~~~ .S!~~80u ¿g~u CIIUU~2C11c)0.S!C)t::!EE!tIEEEE-CllCIIE~~Qj 8.s::.01-~E c33~g~CII~~CII[00~0000~EEocE_ccc~co~!tI ~__ooCll02~.s::.20~~0~~~~e¡;;¡;;~O!tle.!!!.!!!.!!!E~ooo~ OooØZCDZ~~oo~WOOI-OOOOl-o..o..OØJ:I-CDCDCDoo~~ZCD MMI'-~01'-01'-'<t~8""0~No)~0~M~~~008"'0"'00 0000000000 00000000000000 00000 0000000000 oOOOOOgMNOOOO.... ....0000 00000000000000000 0000000000000 00~....'<t~~NM""""NO'<tM8NN""""MOO""""NN_NOO MMNOOO....OOoooooo 00000....000000000 000000000000000 000000000000000 0_0000000000000000000000000000000 MMM~NNNNNMMM""M""""""M_""MNMN""""""NNOO ~~~~~;~~NN~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~g8~ UMMMMM~~~~MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM~MOOC ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~OO~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~g~~ Treasure Coast Newspapers ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA MAY 16,2006 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Sec- tion 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie COunty Land Devel- oøment COde and in accordance wlth the provi- sions of the St, ',Lucie County Comprehensive Plan that the following applicants have request- ed that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners considers their following re- quests: ' . 1. MICHAEL BRYANT for a Change In ZOning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Slngle-l'amliy - 2 ¡julac) Zoning District to the AG -I (AgrIcultural- 1 du/ac> Zoning District for the ·fo!lowlng de- scribed property: 13 35 39 THAT PART OF S 112 OF SW 1/4 OF NE 114 LYG EL Y OF E R/W I-gs-LESS S 42.5 FT- (5.75' AC) , (OR 692-2732). Location: West side of Bennet Road¡¡ approxi- mately 1,950 feet south of Peterson Roa ; 2. HALF HOUR CUSTOM AUDIO AND ACCESSORIES for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the opera- tion of a Motor Vehicle Repair Service - Body Repair In the CG (Commerclal,General) Zoning District for the foliowing described propertY: LEXINGTON SQUARE LOTS 13 AND 14 (1.34 AC) (OR 2051-182)., Location: 6900 Heritage Drive, Port, St. Lucie; Florida. 3. SABIN COMPANIES. INC. fOr a Conditional Use Permit to aliow the operation of a household gOodswarehoùsing and storage mlnl,-ware- house facility In the CG (Commercial, General) Zonln.!L District for the following described Tlflof8üf~ 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE I SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20. TOWNSHIP 3S SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE EAST '560.0 FEET. AND, THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR CANAL , RIGHT OF WAY,AND LESS THE RIGHT-OF·WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TOGETHER WITH: THE WEST 520.0 FEET OF ,THE EAST ,560.0 FEET OF THE SOUTH'll2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST. ST. LUCIE COUNTY" FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 f'EETAND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CAN-AL RIGHT OF WAY. AND THAT CERTAIN PAR- CEL CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST., LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI- DA, FILED FOR RECORD, OCTOBER 12. 1988 IN O.R.B.6C!.7~~AGE 27, PUBl.IC RECORDS OF ST. LU- CIE COUNIY, FLORIDA. 'ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT· , ING THAT CERTAIN PARCEL' OF LAND DESCRIBED IN O.RoB. 1098, PAGE 1842. AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST.1UCIE COUNTY, FLORI- DA. LESS THE WEST 742.9B FEET (B.9 ACRES) 'THEREOF. _, ,,' '- ",: Location: North side of Edwards Road, approxi- mately 250 feet west of South 2Sth Street. 4. SABIN COMPANIES, INC for a Chanøe In Zoning from the RS . 4 (Residential. Slngfe-Famlly - 4 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Orchid Place) Zoning Dis- trict and Preliminary Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the following described prop- Tij~EST 742.98 f'EET (&9 ACRES) OF THE FOL· LOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: THE SOUTH 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 ÖF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 3S SOUTH. RANGE 40 EAST ST. LUCIECOUNTV, FLORIDA. ,LESS AND EX- CEPTINGTHE EAST 560.0 FEET. AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR CANAL RIGHT OF WAY, AND LESS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TO, GETHER WITH: THE WEST 520.0 FEET OF THE EAST 560.0 FEET OF THE SOUTH 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20. TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 FEET AND THe: NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WAY AND THE CERTAIN PAR- CEL CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY., FLORI- DA. FILED FOR RECORD, OCTOBER 12. 1988 IN 0. A. B. 607, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LU- CIE COUNTY, f'LORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT- ING THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN O.R.B. 1098, PAGE 1842. AS RECORDED IN THE PUBL1C RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI- Lo:i:lon:North side of Edwards Road. approxi- mately 650 feet west of South 25th Street. Tuesday, May 2. 2006 5. TAILERS' COVE DEVELOPMENT, LLC for a Change In Zoning from the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Tallers' COve) Zon- Ing District. and Preliminary and Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the follow- TJ~g~=~~~~ PARCEL G. F.E. ENGLER'S PLAT OF SURVEY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, AT PAGE 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LYING WEST OF STATE ROAD A-loA. ' Location: West side of south SR A-loA. directly across from Atlantis I Condominlúms ' 16. CHARLES AND PEGGY WARD for a Change In Zoning from the RS -2 (Residential. Single -Faml· Iy - 2 dulac) Zoning District to the AR - 1 (Agr- , icultural. Residential - 1 dulac) Zoning District for the following described property: l! 355 39£ 13 35 39 N 1/2 OF N1/2 OF S 112 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 114 -LESS W 2 AC OF SO N 1/2 OF S 112 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 AND LESS E 550.01 FT . (1.92 AC) (OR 1000-81: 1005-2109: 1204-1397) 13 35S 39£ 13 35 39 W 510.01 FT OF E 550.01FT OF N 112 OF N 1/2 OF S 112 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 (1.93 AC) (OR 52IH343.1344: 1017-2312: 1204-1398) , Location: 1245 South Jenkins Road, Fort Pierce, Florida. ' 7. JOHN WARD for a Change In Zoning from the RS -2 (Residential. Single-Family - 2 dulac) Zon- Ing District to the AR - 1 (Agricultural, Residen- tilil - 1 dulac) Zoning District for the followIng described prolerty: , THE PARCEL CONTAINED WITHIN: THE SOUTH, 112 OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF TFlE NORTHEAST 114 OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF SECTION 13. TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THE WEST 2 ACRES OF THE SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF THE NORTHEAST 114 OF SEC- TION 13. TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ALSO LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM. ROAD RIGHT - OF -WAY. Location: 1275 South Jenkins Road, Fort Pierce. Florida.' -' The PUBLIC HEARING on this Item will be held in the Commission Chambers. Roger Poitras An- nex, 3rd Floor. St. Lucie County Administration Building, 2300, VJrglnla Avenue, Fort Pierce, Flori- da on May 16, 2006, beginning at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. Action can be tak· en at this ineetlngj or the Item can be continued to a future date ana time. ' All Interested persons will be given an opportunl-, ty to be heard. Written comments received In advance of the public hearing will also be con- sidered. Written comments to the Board of County Commissioners should be received by the Growth Management Department -, Planning Division at least 3 da~s prior tathe, scheduled hearing. The petItion file Is available for review at the Growth Management Department offices located a, t 2300 V'rp'nia Avenue. Fort, Pierce. Florida. Please cal 772/462-2822 If you have any questions or require additional Information. The file for this project may be Inspected prior to the hearing date in the Growth Management , Department. J300 Virginia Avenue; 2nd Floor. I Fort Pierce Florida. , " The St. Lucie, County Board of County Commis- ,sloners has the power to ,review and grant any applications within their area of responsibility. The proceedings of the Board of County COmmis- sioners are electronically recorded. ÞURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes. If a person , decides to appeal any decision made by the Board, of COunty COmmissioners with respect to any matter coniidered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record ,of the proceedings. , For such purpose, he may need to, ensure that a verbatim record of, the proceedings Is made, which record Includes the testimony and evl· dence upon which the appeal Is to be. based. Upon the request of any party to the proceed- ing. IndlvlduáJs testifying durfng a hearing will be sworn In. ,Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opp'ortunlty to cross·examlne any lndivldual testifying during a hearing upon request. If It becomes necessary, a public hear- Ing may be continued from time to time as may be necessary to a date-certain. " Anyone with a disability requiring accommoda, - tlon to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County CommunIty ServIces Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meet- , Ing at 7721462-lm or T.D.D. 772/462-1428. ' BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA IS! DOUG COWARD. CHAIRMAN PUBLISH DATE: May 2, 2006 Publish: May 2, 2006 1384761 -r ~ To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: aJ APPROVED c::=J OTHER County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Agenda Request Item Number Date: ---.! X_ 05116106 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ X ] Presented By ~~~ !Growth Management Director Consider Draft Resolution No. œ-056 granting a Conditionaf Use Pennit to allow the operation of a Motor Vehicle Repair Service including Body Repair in the CG (Commercial, General)Zoning District for property located at 6900 Heritage Drive. Board of County Commissioners Growth Management The petitioner, Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories, ~nc., has requested this Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a Motor Vehicle Repair Services including Body Repair in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. (FileNo: CU- 06-001 ) N/A At the April 20, 2006, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 4 to 2 (Mr. Heam and Mrs. Hammer) with three members (Ramon Trias, John Knapp, and Ed Lounds) absent, recommended approval of the conditional use permit subject to one limiting condition. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 06-056. Approved 5-0 c=J DENIED % ~ M. Anderson County Administrator ,~ . Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Environmental Res. Div.: Purchasing: Other: Tnnsmittal Master Checklist Primary Distribution Environmental Resources Department, Amy Mott: Sent N/A Received Public Works Surveyor - Ron Harris: N/ A Road, Bridge, & Transportation N/ A - Scott Herring: Stonnwater Management N/ A - Chris Lestrange: General Engineering - Kyle Croce: N/ A Zoning Supervisor - Paula Bushby: N/ A Attorney Prop Acquisition - JoAnn Riley: N/ A Sheriff's Department - Major Monahan: N/A St Lucie County Fire District - Captain Derek Foxx: N/A Ft Pierce FannslNorth St Lucie Water Control District N/A - Ray Garcia: Property Appraiser's Office - Maurice Snyder: N/ A IF AS - Jeffrey Gellennann: N/ A Residential Onlv School Board of St Lucie County - Marty Sanders: N/ A Community Services (Transit) - Jody Bonet: N/ A Geoe:nDhical Based St Lucie County Utility Department - Mike Bowers: N/ A Airport Authority - Diana Lewis: N/ A City of Ft Pierce - Beach/Recor: N/ A City of Port St Lucie - Cheryl Friend: N/A Ft Pierce Utilities Authority - David Mellert: N/A Education and Research Authority - Jane Bachelor: N/ A Board of County Commission Review: 05/16/2006 File Number CU-06-001 M E M 0 RAN· DUM DEPARTMENT OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Bob Nix, AICP - Growth Management Director ~ G,~ ~ .~ \ Hank Flores, Planning Manager ~~ THROUGH: DATE: May 10, 2006 SUBJECT: Application of Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories, Inc., for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a motor vehicle body repair service in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. LOCATION: ZONING DESIGNATION: 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie CG (Commercial, General) Attached is a copy of Section 3.01.03(S) - CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, which delineates the permitted, accessory, and conditional ·uses allowed in the zoning district. LAND USE DESIGNATION: COM (Commercial) PARCEL SIZE: 1.34 acres PROPOSED USE: Motor Vehicle Body Repair Service SURROUNDING ZONING: CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the north, south, east, and west. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The existing land use surrounding the subject property is Commercial. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #6 (350 Midway Road) is located approximately , 3 miles to the north. May 10,2006 Page 2 Subject: Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories, Inc. File No.: CU-06-001 UTILITY SERVICE: Water and wastewater service is provided by the Port St. Lucie' Utilities. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT -OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way for Heritage Drive is 60 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity. ***************************************************** STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed conditional use, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed conditional use is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed conditional use is not in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 3.01.03(S)(7), CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District, allows the operation of a motor vehicle body repair as a conditional use, subject to Board of County Commission approval. 2. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would have an adverse impact on nearby properties; The proposed conditional use is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. The proposed site is located within an area zoned for commercial, general uses and there are several motor vehicle repair services in the area which include St. Lucie Battery and Tire, Snappy Auto Center, F & M Car Care, Inc., and Wilson's European Car Care. Other businesses in the area are pest control, air conditioning contractors and veterinary services. May 10, 2006 Subject: Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories, Inc. Page 3 File No.: CU-06-001 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including roads, police protection, solid waste disposal, water, sewer, drainage structures, parks, and mass transit; This conditional use is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. The proposed property will receive water and wastewater service through Port St. Lucie Utilities. 4. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed conditional use is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. COMMENTS The applicant, Aaron Savela - owner of Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories, Inc., has applied for the requested conditional use in order to allow the operation of a motor vehicle body repair service for property leased from 6900 Heritage, Inc., located at 6900 Heritage Drive, in the Lexington Square Subdivisions in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. this activity is allowed as a conditional use in this zoning distriQt upon the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. The CG (CommerCial, General) Zoning District permits the operation of Motor Vehicle Repair (except body repair) which include, but not limited, to tire repair, brake replacement, battery and ignition repair, general automotive engine repair and transmission repair. The applicant proposes to operate a custom painting facility in addition to an existing custom audio and accessories shop. Approval of this conditional use will allow the applicant to have a paint booth installed. The Florida Department of Environmental-Protection governs the paint booth operation and the St. Lucie County Fire District and Building Department regulates the installation of paint booths. At the April 20, 2006, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 4 to 2 (Mr. Hearn and Mrs. Hammer) with three members (Mr. Trias, Mr. Knapp, and Mr. Lounds) absent, recommended approval of the requested Conditional Use Permit with one limiting condition. At the April 20, 2006, meeting, the Planning and Zoning Commission heard testimony from residents in the Oleander Pines Subdivision, located to the west of Lexington Square regarding the lack of a buffer area between the residential area and the commercial operations in Lexington Square. The Oleander Pines residents' issues were about the noise created by existing motor vehicle repairs services and the proposed body repair to May 10, 2006 Page 4 Subject: Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories, Inc. File No.: CU-06-001 motor vehicles and the need for the buffer area between the commercial, general zoning district and the Planned Unit Development - Oleander Pines Zoning District. There were several residences from Oleander Pines Subdivision complaining that the dense vegetated buffer was recently removed by the developer of Oleander Pines. The Code Enforcement Division has been notified and they are investigating the vegetation removal. The Conditional Use Permit requested is located on the east side of Heritage Drive and not directly adjacent to the Oleander Pines Subdivision. Staff Recommendation Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms to the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that the, Board approve the petition for a conditional use permit to allow a Motor Vehicle Repair Service including Body Repair in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District subject to the following condition: The Conditional Use Permit shall be restricted to avoid major collision repair but not avoid painting. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution No. 06-056, which if approved, would grant the conditional use permit. Please let this office know if you have any other questions. SUBMITTED: ~ (;..; ~~ Bod Nix, AICP Growth Management Director Attachment - lap cc: Aaron Savela 6900 Heritage, Inc. File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 RESOLUTION NO. 06-056 FILE NO.: CU06-o01 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW THE OPERATION OF A MOTOR VEHICLE BODY REPAIR SERVICE IN THE CG (COMMERCIAL, GENERAL) ZONING DISTRICT FOR CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories. Inc. presented a petition for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for the operation of a Motor Vehicle Body Repair Service in CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District, depicted on the attached maps as Exhibit liB" and described in Part liB" below. 2. On April 20, 2006, the S1. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve a conditional use permit to allow for the operation of a Motor Vehicle Body Repair Service in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for the property depicted on the attached maps and described in Part B below. 3. On May 16, 2006, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 1 0 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the sUbject property. 4. The proposed Conditional Use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the S1. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.07.03 of the 51. Lucie County Land Development Code. 5. The proposed Conditional Use will not have an undue adversé effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, and general welfare. 6. The proposed Conditional Use will be serviced by adequate public facilities and services. 7. A Certificate of Capacity as required under Chapter V. S1. Lucie Land Development Code, a copy of which is attached to this resolution as Exhibit "A", was granted by the Growth Management Director on May 16, 2006. File No.: CU-06-001 May 16,2006 Resolution No. 06-056 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 NOW, THEREFORE, BElT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a Conditional Use Permit for Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories, Inc. to allow for the operation of a Motor Vehicle Body Repair Service in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District is hereby approved for the property described below, subject to the following condition: The Conditional Use Permit shall be restricted to avoid major collision repair, but not avoid painting. B. The property on which this conditional use permit is being granted is described as follows: Lexington Square, Lot 13 and 14. (Property Tax ID#3415-702-o012-000/5) (Location: 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie) C. This Conditional Use Permit approval shall expire on May 16, 2007, unless a zoning compliance is obtained or an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.02.06(B)(3), St. Lucie County Land Development Code. D. The Conditional Use Permit approval granted under this Resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories, Inc., including any successors in interest, shaU obtain all necessary permits and authoiizations from the appropriate Local, State, and Federal regulatory authorities prior to the issuance of any local building permits or authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part B. E. The Certificate of Capacity,a copy of which is attached to this resolution as Exhibit "A", shall remain valid for the period òf Conditional Use approval. Should the Conditional Use approval granted by this resolution expire or an extension be sought pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Cöde, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. F. The St. Lucie County Growth Management Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. File No.: CU-06-001 May 16, 2006 Resolution No. 06-056 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward XXX Vice-Chairman Chris Craft XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX Commissioner Joseph E. Smith XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 16th Day of May, 2006. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney lap H:\PLANNING\Conditional Use\6900 Heritage Drive\CU06-001 RES.doc File No.: CU-06-001 May 16, 2006 Resolution No. 06-056 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 Exhibit A Certificate of Capacity .- File No.: CU-06-001 May 16, 2006 . Resölution No. 06-056 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 Exhibit B 6 7 8 · General Location Map · Area Subject to the Conditional Use Permit · Aerial Map · Zoning Map · Land Use Map 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 File No.: CU-06-001 May 16, 2006 Resolution No. 06-056 Page 5 o .- "'0 :J <~ E'c .s~ cncn :JQ) uS 5< 0"'0 Iæ ~ co I z+. ~ .. I ~." ,'I J'~ d \{~ ~1 T'"" o o I CD o ::> () r ::I o o ;p .i!!: 0:: c ... :¡; .5 .t' 0"- ! .. .., i .... ...- ! !i oW ..... .... ...., I i ð AJunoo øeqOIOØ8J() ~ Ö - or; E cv :E "0 f !. ~ Q. cv :E ~' C ::I o o c 'ë ... :IE . . A petition of Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a, Motor Vehicle Repair Services-Body Repair in Commercial, General, Zoning District 3 133 134 135 136 137 161 4 5 6 160 3 7 159 2 2 8 158 157 1 10 9 153 152 151 150 149 NSlRDD CANAL NO. 28 ~ '3 28 z o 8 27 o CU 06-001 2 4 2 3 ~ 6 :I: 9 .... WILLIAMSBURG WAY en ::J en 16 7 15 II:: c 17 ~ 8 0 z 18 c( 1- 1 J: I 1 --------- 81 I I 1 19 I I L _I I I I I 91 I I 1 ~ 10 I I :I: L I ..... en ::J 10 11 21 en 11~- ~f'4)~6~ i1~ )~0111-;-2-1 L J_ 1_ I _, _ _ _ I _. _ L.. ~_ I Legend WZ1 Subject property NSlRDD CANAL LAKe VISTA TRL 5t:-.£uoú ~~~ ~r""'r¡f~t OtrjNÞ"_r Map prepared March 13, 2006 N A Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories Zoning 2 3 35 133 134 135 136 137 4 2 4 3 >- 6 3: 38 :I: 9 WILLIAMSBURG WAY en :::> CG en 16 CG 7 15 a:: c 17 :II:: () 0 () z 161 18 « 1- ï :I: 1 I --------- 160 81 ¡ 1 1 19 1 1 159 ' -, ------- ï - I 20 1 1 158 91 1 I 1 ~ 10 157 1 I , :I: , 1 en :::> 10 11 21 en 11-~- '3-14-~ '6' ~ -a }f0111"£, 153 152 151 150 149 L __1_1_ ~-' .- - - ~ - NSLRDD CANAL NSLRDD CANAL NO. 28 BRAZILIAN CIR PNRD RM-9 PUD w .~ 5 28 z o () 27 o () CG CU 06-001 Legend ~ Subject property 5è.Å~~~.~. {jrtTWrlf .JIi.....itJJU1Ir DtyNViJrJIrU N A Map prepared March 13. 2006 Half Hour c.,ustom Audio and Accessories Land Use 2 P/F 3 35 132 133 134 135 136 137 4 2 4 3 ~ 38 6 J: 9 WilLIAMSBURG WAY (/'J ::¡ (/'J 16 COM COMr 15 a::: c 17 ::.:: (.) 0 (.) z 161 18 < 4 5 6 1- 1 J: 1 1 --------- 160 81 I 1 I 19 3 I 1 L _ 1 ------- 20 ï -I 1 1 91 1 I 1 ~ 10 10 9 1 I J: L 1 (/'J ::¡ 10 11 21 (/'J 11-~- '3-14-~ ì6' ~ -ß l{0111~2-1 R 153 152 151 150 149 L ~~I_I_ _1_1 ._1_ _'-_I NSlRDD CANAL NSlRDD CANAL NO. 28 BRAZILIAN CIR RM RM COM COM UJ ~ 5 28 z o (.) 27 o (.) CU 06-001 Legend ~ Subject property 5è ~~,;ç ~-7~~. 9rITW11i .ß(ørrøe-I D9'V1MnI1 N A Map prepared March 13,2006 Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories ..... .. .. . .. · 0.40 .. · · · 1ib.08 · · · · .0.16 . . . , . .. 0.15 . .. . 0.37 ANAL NO. 28 , , , , . . 1.46 1 1 1 I 1 , 2~5_ , ----------- 1 1 1 , 1 1 1 1 , - _I .. ......... ....... 0.18 ." . ~ :I: 0.21 WILLIAMSBURG WAY " . " 0 . :) '.0 , . , . .. . . 0.66 0.95 Œ: o ~ o o o z -< ;:¡: 0.66 _____128______ 0.50 2.25 r - -(l99- ,- ., -, I I 1 I I 1 I L _~. ,.L _~ _~ _~ _I - -,- ì -dJ - - ~ - 1 1 , (84¡ 1 1 1 _ 1 _ 1 _ L ~ _i... _I . . . . .. .. .. . . 1.81 BRAZilIAN CIR '. .. . 0.81 '. .. ...... CU 06-001 .'" 0.59 ..... ................. ~ Subject property 9:- ..L~ú ~~Ä (jrl1'Wl"Ii .JIt....-.r1 :De.JNIT11IIÐI1 ..... · · SOD' buffer .. . ..1 . Map prepared March 13,' 2006 . . . .oa . i , '. ' , · · · 0.35: · · · · · · · · · 0.17' . . . o :) o . .æ . . lAKE VISTA TRL NSLRD N A Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories CU 06-001 Legend ~ Subject property ~, ~ t;¡".Mn9 ~:~. (;rtrWln .:Mtanu¡¡¡__t :tJ9fIZrtm;en' N A Map prepared March 13, 2006 s. CG COMMERCIAL. GENERAL 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for a wide variety of commercial uses intended to serve a population over a large market area, which do not impose undesirable noise, vibration, odor, dust, or offensive effects on the surrounding area, together with such other uses as may be necessary to and compatible with general commercial surroundings. The number in ·0· following each identified use corresponds to the 'SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(8). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Adjustment/collection & credit reporting services (732) . b. Advertising (731) c. Amphitheaters (999) -' d. Amusements & recreation serVices - except stadiums¡arenas, race tracks, amusement parks and bingo parlors (79) - .' e. Apparel & accessory stores (56) f. Automobile dealers (55) g. Automotive rental, repairs & servo (except body repairs) (75';753.754) h. Beauty and barber services (7231724) _ ' i. Building materials, hardware and garden supply (52) j. Cleaning services 7349) k. Commercial printing (999) I. Communications - except towers (41) m. Computer programming, data processing'& other computer servo (737) n. Contract construction servo (office & interior storage only) (1S'1&i17) O. Cultural activiti~s and nature exhibitions (999) p. Duplicating, mailing, commercial art/photo. & stenog. servo (733) q. Eating places (511) r. , Educational services - except public schools (82) S. Engineering, accounting, research, management & related services (17) t. Equipment rental and leasing services (735) U. Executive, legislative, and judicial functions (91/92193/94J95196197) V. Farm labor and management services (076) - W. Financial, insurance, and real estate (~11112163164165167) X. Food stores (54) y. Funeral and crematory services (726) z. Gasoline service stations (5541) aa. General merchandise stores (53) bb. Health services (10) cc. Home furniture and furnishings (57) dd. Landscape & horticultural services (071) ee. Laundry, cleaning and garment services (721) ft. Membership organizations - except for religious organizations as provided in Section 8.02.01 (H) of this code (16) gg. Miscellaneous retail (see SIC Code Major Group 59): (1) Drug stores (591) (2) Used merchandise stores (593) (3) Sporting goods (5941) , St. ,Lucie county Land Development Code ~ August 1. 1990 3-29 - , ReYlsed TbrOUiIh 05115104 (4) Book & stationary (5942/5943) , (5) Jewelry (5944) (6) Hobby, toy and games (5945) (7) Camera & photographic supplies (5946) (8) Gifts, novelty and souvenir (5947) (9) Luggage & leather goods (5948) (10) Fabric and mill products (5949) (11) Catalpg, mail order and direct selling (596115963) (12) Liquified petroleum gas (propane) (59114) (13) Aorists (5992) , (14 ) Tobacco (5993) (15) News dealers/newsstands (5994) (16) Optical goods (5995) (17) Misc. retail (See SIC Code for specific uses) (5999) hh. Miscellaneous personal services (see SIC Code Major Group 72): (1) Tax return services (7291) " ' (2) Misc. retail (See SIC Code for specific uses) (7299) , ii. Miscellaneous business services (see SIC Code Major Group 73): (1) Detective, guard and armored car services (73a1) , (2) Security system services (7382) (3) News syndicate (7383) (4) Photofinishing laboratories (7384) (5) Business services - misc. (7389) jj. Mobile home dealers (527) kk. Mobile food vendors (eating places. fruits & vegetables-retail) (999) II. Motion pictures (78) mm. Motor vehicle parking - commercial parking & vehicle storage. (752) nn. Museums, galleries and gardens (84) 00. Personnel supply services (736) pp. Photo finishing services (7384) qq. Photographic services (722) rr. Postal services (43) ss. Recreation facilities (999) tt. Repair services (76) , uu. Retail trade-indoor display and sales only, except as provided in Section 7.00.00. (999) vv. Social services: (1) Individual & family social services (8321839) (2) Child care services (835) (3) Job training and vocational rehabili.tation services (1133) ww. Travel agencies (4724) xx. Veterinary services (074) 3. lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7 .04.00~ II. LucIe CounIy Land Development Code AdapIIcI August '. 1990 3-30 . ~sed ThIough bsl151Ó4 5. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. , 6. Landscaping Requirements Landscapin~ requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00. 7. Conditional Uses . ' a. Adult establishments subject to requirements of Sec. 7.10.10. (999) b. Drinking places (alcoholic beverages) - free-standing. (5113) c. Disinfecting & pest control services. (7342 d. Amusement parks. (7996) e. Go-cart tracks. (7999) f. Hotels & motels. (701) g. Househöld goods warehousing and storage-mini-warehouses (999) h. Marina - recreational boats only. (....93) i. Motor vehicle repair services - body repair. (753) j. . Sporting and recreational camps. (7032) k. Retail trade: (1) Liquor stores. (592) k. Stadiums, arenas, and race tracks. (79") I. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (999) 8. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following: a. Drinking places (alcoholic beverages as an accessory use to a restaurant and/or civic, social, and fraternal organizations). b. One single-family dwelling unit contained within the commercial .building, or a detached single-family dwelling or mobile home, (for on-site security purposes). c. Retail trade: (1) Undistilled alcoholic beverages (accessory to retail sale of food). Sl'LuCIe CounIy Land DeveIopmIInt Code , Adopted AUgust 1. 1990 3-31 ~ . '.' ReVIsed ThroUgh 05f1Sf()4 the Board of County Commissioners hears the petition. Mr. Grande stated he will amend his motion to include that verbiage. Ms. Caron seconded the amended motion. Roll Call Mr. Grande - Yes to approve Ms. Caron - Yes Ms. Hammer - Yes Ms. Morgan - Yes Mr. Mundt - Yes Chairman Hearn - Yes Unanimously approved. Aaron Savella, Owner, Hour tom Audio and Accessories stated he is interested in doing custom graphics. He did n ed paint facility, however, he is attempting to put in additional safe guards for the environm d the surrounding neighborhood. The work he does on his site is audio and accessories work, b ây tints, performance parts, wheels, tires, stereo equipment, etc. Mr. Savella stated the paint booth has filters on the intake and within paint booth and filters on the outgoing to collect particles. There are minimal fumes escaping in the air. The unit falls within the all of the EPA Safety regulations. ssib oise from a body shop in the . s stated that the fire district has not signed off to go through a permitting process. She al use, if it becomes a nuisance to the public. custom paint facility to an existing auto business Mr. Nix advised that applicaµt or his representative contact him re agreement. A enda Item #7: Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessori Linda Pendarvis, Planner, petition of Aaron Sevella, 0 Accessories, Inc. request for a Conditional Use Pe repair service-body repair in the SG Commercial Z Heritage Drive, Port S1. Lucie. The applicant proposes to requires a paint booth in addition to an existi ustom acce Conditional Use will allow the applicant to ha . t booth Chairman Hearn stated he had conc Commercial General Zoning dis on the proposed activity and further stated that this board can Linda stated that the ap which does not inclu Chairman Hearn will open the public hearing. Ed Boslow, 4 Sandberg Lane approximately 650 ft away from this business. He states the auto repair noise, guns that take tires off, etc is absolutely terrible. If this petition is approved and this business adds the repair of bumpers, dents, front ends, etc. this would be opening up a can of worms. There is enough noise now without allowing the operation of sanders that produce that high pitched noise and other loud machinery that the approval of this petition would allow. Please do not approve this petition. Lighting at night from these businesses is offensive to some of the residents. 9 When compressors are used with air guns, etc. the noise will greatly violate the privacy, peace of mind and consideration of the residents. Ms. Caron asked if there is a buffer which separates these businesses from these residences. Mr. Boslow stated that the buffer was taken down previously. Ms. Hammer asked staff if there was a pennit to remove the buffer. Mr. Nix stated the issue before us is whether or not to grant the Conditional Use which is not directly related to the code enforcement issue. The noise complaints need to go to the Code Enforcement Board to be resolved. Therefore, the zoning issue can move fOlWard. Chainnan Hearn stated that a condition of 3-4 cars being painted per month can be put on this conditional use. Mike Florio, Dickinson Terrace, Oleander Pines stated the noise is disgraceful and no effort has been made to reduce the noise to show consideration for the residents. Walter Glenn, Lot 149 stated he is against this petition because of the noise. A retaining wall or er is needed to reduce the noise and the lights shining into the residences. Jerry Duckwort émed about additional noise this approved petition was cause. Chainnan Hearn stated ift 'tional use pennit is approved, the applicant has the right to repair damaged vehicles whi 'tional noise. Chainnan Hearn will close the public hearing. . ting of autos is done in an enclosed vices currently in place not add to the existing noise. ecomes a nuisance in the . Gran stated that the condition on the ork, noisy body work and major collision th collision repair work. The work is Mr. Mundt made a S1. Lucie Board of, ' Audio and Accessory, vehiCle body repair servic allowed as a Conditional Use avoid major collision repair motion. 1anning and Zoning Commission recommend that the grant approval for the application of Half Hour Custom itional Use Pennit to allow for the operation of a motor Commercial General Zoning district because this activity is e Zoning district and that the Conditional Use be restricted to rk and minor work but not avoid painting. Ms. Morgan seconded the Roll Call Mr. Mundt - Yes to approve Ms. Morgan - Yes Ms. Hammer - No Mr. Grande - Yes Ms. Caron - Yes Chainnan Hearn - No 4 - 2 to approve this Conditional Use Pennit 10 .... c Co? co c ::J o fÏ GI .¡: co is IIIN 8M u.... <.r; 'Cu C ~ III III o~ =äJÍ 3111 .....'0 E ~ o 3: -;j ï! ::I a. 0a. ~< ~~ _GI -a. !e ...a. .2E ~e .- - -;j'C = .! OGl a. ::I <0 ~~aare~aa~aa~reð 8 ~~ õ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ 8 ~NNN~NNMNNMOO 0 ~M ~ MM MM MMMM M M ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 9 ~~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~~~~ ~ ~ N~~N~~~~~~~OOONNNN~NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN ~~~~M~~~~~~MM~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ a.~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Ñ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ .!!! ~ .~ .~ ,~ ~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ .~ ::I goB.... B B ::I ::I ::I ø ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ~ ~~ ........~~~m~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ... _ 'rJ').~ .9:l .!I! ...... ... .... c ...... ... .... ... ... .... ... .... ..., _ .., ... +'" ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ø--ø---a.--~--a.a.øøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøøø ~~~~~~~~~~~III~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ # 0,-'- 0 .- .-.- 0 .- .- 3 .- .- 0 0 0 0 0 ø 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 oa.~~a.~~~~~~ø~~~~a.a.a.,a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a.a. ê ø ä: ~ o ~ N o 0.... """ ~øø øø øø ~~ ~ ~ S ~CII~~ ~~ ~~¡N~ CII~ ~~~ ~~~ ~~~~ ....ø~~ ~ ãjø OØØ~~ØØCD~~ØØØCD Ø CDØ <.> ~'C'C""ø'C'C~'C'C -ø ........~c ~~øø~~~øø~~~~....~~~~....c ~ccC>cc<cccøw~CC~~ccc~~ccc~~ccccCC>CCOCII ~~~~<~~ø~~~w-~~~~Ig~~gccgg~ccgggg~g~gg~~ ~~~'=~~~~~o_ø~~.~' ::IeccOOcccoocccc~'c~cc~N ø ::> > _ ~ > > ¡:'::> > 0 ø ~ N ~ ~ ø .0 m .- .- CII CII .- '- .- CII CII .- .- .- .- J!! .- ø .- .- J!! e! III::J::»~ >::>CII» -~~~::J'C ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~::J~~~m lIIø~~~~~~o~~~~~ð~~ø~~ÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕÕ~ÕøÕÕ~W fooo~oooooo~øøm~~o ~~~M~~M~~~~~~o~o~~~z ~~~~~o~~o~~~ OOO~~N~MM~~~~~~~~~MOMO~~~O <~~~~~~~~~~~~~a.mm~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~m~ 'C a::: CII c :¥ c ø , ø ~ N ~ N GI E III C ~ c=:! GI C ~ ~ III C ~ c=:! GI C ~ < ~ CII c~ CII"" a. .... ø .A CII CD C CII .- C C , ø CII := ..... .CD CII ~ (\ CII :; coo c u € E ,!!! .5 'C = .t: '3 c of! 't: .t: CII .t: (\ CII - CII C CII (\ CII CII CD CII CII ~wmu~~::J~~a.cw~~ .... s ro 3: W CII :g iV a. « ~I~ ~ ~ CII CII ~~ « ~~ Q CD ~ ~ CII CII ~~ « >- >- ø Q ~ ~ CII CII ~~ 'c¡¡O Ìj'CIIC C ~ C CII .~ 2: z~, c ~ 5! :¥~:¥ CII::: 0 cnOCII cc .- CD .... ø c c ~ c ø Q c ~ c !!> ~ 0 CII CII .- ",,'- CII C C ~~. ~ -.;; .t: .t: CD E u E 'C 0 0 CII, CII :¡¡ ø .!!! .2 CII E (\ ::ICII ::I 0 0 ~~,~u~~<~c~cmm c c CII CII ~ ~ Q CD zz c c (\ CII ~ ~ CD CD zz c c CII CII ~ ~ Q CD zz - ~ .!!! 'ãj ~ rü:Z= COu: c ~ c t:! ~ CD " m CD E III C ~ ~ Ìj'~'Emm cc;'2'C CIICII'C~~ ZZW~~ ~ ~ uu CII -....ø c ~ ø c 'C C CD .... CIII ~ ~ (\ ~ Co'2 ~ ~ ø .9 æ'3 ê~"fi c'3 E ~5!.9~~ ~ = .... (\ ø CII .- CD (\ 0 ø 0 coo.!!! ~ma.~"~~a.a:::,,<a:::o::a. " ~ ~ ~ Co~ ~ __ø__ ¡g ¡g :g ¡g ¡g "", 0::< ~ ø ~e o CII o::U .... ~ CII ~~ C ~ ~~ 2- --='-' ø CII .¡: ø C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ œ j j ~ u e- u CD ro 0 ro e- uE Co g<;. U Co u 8 :::jgCII Gl8"!; ~ 8 .5 - c<.>5! ECII ØCD CII OJc 0 ~ "is. Sa. CII"iS. Q) _cnC IIIW ClIO "" W C) ~ ro-"O c ._ .... CII CII._ > CII U C ~= ga. 0 = _€_ ~ ~ >Oc:E ~~QCD~cn'ECDCI) Qø~ ~ ~ ::: g .~. cc-~ Q).... c~g3: GI~cc CIIcc....CCUCIICIIO........~ fQ....ØoCIICIIs~s CDØ5! Cc~CII'CU~a::: c~cc cccCDcc::l--E"~c c~~-~CDE""E(\CC~occ~Uc::l£~ ~-~~EO~~-~~~» -~ C~CII"" ~ U 'COOUOØ~~CCII~X ~ 0 >'.;; _ Q) .;;.;; = ::> > .... CII CII:= .- .- 0 CII Q CD Q - .2 .\!1 (\::ICQ::I 0 0 ._ ~ - >' CD CII .... Q ø O~::»~~»:E::»øcc~""~~~,:EU~~ ~c~cmmm~"::>m><.>ø~z , ~~~~~~8°~ð8~~~~a~~8õa~~~õ8~~~~~~8~~~a~8~õ8 00080088008000000 0008~00008°000ooooooooo 000000 000 000000 ooo~õoooo 0000000000000 R~a~~~~~~~õm~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~oN~~Õ~~~~88 00000000000008õoo08o~000'88008oð088ooo08o0 QOOOOOOOOOOOOO 0000 00000 00 000 0000 00 -õ~~~~~~~~~~õõ~~~õ~~~~~~~~~~~8~~~~~~~~~~a8 C¡¡~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~8 f~~~~~~~~~~N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~N~O ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .... o q CO o ::;) o iii CII 'C co 5:g I/IN ~C'i' ~.... _.c ... ~ C It ~::E :SŠ ,::I It <C'O E .. .s.; !!l I! -a. 0a. S<C ~~ _CII -a. ~ e ..11. .2E g'e ;:1- 1/1'0 = .! o CII 11. ::I <CO ~ N 0 CDN I")N N 1.01.0 en I'- en en OCO CO 1.0 CO 1.0 1.0 ;:I;~ .....1") 00 Oen en en en en en N 1.0 NN 01") ~~ ~~ ~ NI") .....0 COCO 01") , , , , , cJ., I") ..... 1.0 NN CO 1.0 en 1.0 1.0 1.0 en en en en en en ~ ~~ ~~ ~ [i] ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J..J ..J ..J ..J..J ..J u..u.. u..u.. u..u.. u..u.. u..u.. u..u.. u.. Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) ~ Q) Q) Q) .~ .~ ·Ü ·Ü ~ ·Ü ·Ü 'Ü .g 'g ·Ü ·ü ::J ::J ::J ::I ::I ::J ::J ..J ..J ..J ..J ..J III..J ..J ..J ::I ::J Q) .c.... ..J..J CñCñ il:~ CñCñ Cñ oen CñCñ CñCñ I~ ~~ ~ III ~1:: ~ ~1:: ~~ 1::~ o 0 0-= o 0 0 o 0 o 0 o 0 0 11.11. u..en 11.11. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. a.. ....N ¿.¡§ 'C ::;)1") -g 2: -g~ t: <C CO è5 CO ~ .!!! .!!! ãi ~ ~ - 0 Õ COco 1!1 III .!!! -ðè5 C en en ::J ~ ~ Ig I/) ~ è5 è5 .c .- III Q) 81~ 0ë3 .c Q) ~ ~ 'C .9 c ~ I~ .¥ I'-Õ Õ .0 'C III S III Q) I/) S!s ~ ..J c.... ~Q) Q) en ~ a.. 'C S S 1/1 o c ð~ ~ ~~ 'C 'C ~ ~ III ~ W Q) Q) 1/1 CO en I") J: J: e 1'-1.0 COW W en 1.0 en..... en '0 1.0 00 00 0 ..... 0 00 ~ 0 0 ~ N en 1.0 0 ..... I") CD en 0 0 ..... CD,CD a..g en ..... N .....CD I'- en en CD CD ~ It C ..J c;:! CII C ~ 0 CII E It C u.. N .. CII C ~ CII E It C u.. 1: c CII 'C' c C t:. c .8 e ~ Q) ::I ~ 0 C ~ 'Õ .c C%: e- o ::J .Q .91 c III ë3 III ~ ~ ~ Q) Qj !! ::E E CO~ c C%:~ III Qj ..J en Q) N a.. ~ I~ C> ~.!I! I/) en + e ~ c c 0 ~ III ~ -ð III..J 0 J: Z ~ Õ 0 -., 0 ::E ~ C%: 0 ~ C ~ .5 t:. c CII ::J S c .Q ~ Q) I~ E ~ 0 I/) .91 'Õ .c ~ CO ~ .!!l Q) Qj .Q !! 0 ::J ~ It ~ 1:: c C III 0 C ~ ~ & III Qj Qj ~ ::E 0 ::E c ..J -., N c a.. u.. S .... I/) e ~ co 0 Q) .. Q) ~ 'C N ::E 1:: 'ü III CII -¡;; Q) (ij a.. ~ ~ ~ I/) .8 ::J .¡: ê.!!! C III .0 C -e 'S ..J :~ .- Q) ~ .c ãi 0 ~ 0 .0> Q) 0 Cñ ::I III 0 0 0 0 C> C> -., ..J C%: 5 C%:en ìg II¡' It.;' ~ ¿; Is ..... I ~ , 8 ò ò 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 9 0 0 9 9 c: , , , .h , 8 , 0 ...... I'- I") en ..... N N ~ 0 ...... 0 0 0 0 0 ..... 0 ...... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 ii 9 0 9 9 9 9 9 0 9 9 e , cJ., , I") I") I") I") I") I") I") I") I") I") .... 0 0 0 0 0 0' 0 0 0 0 0 c ãi I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- l":- I'- I'- I'- l":- I'- ~ .~ c: 1 ,;., ,;., , , , " .h , Q) ~ ¡ 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 ð Q. It ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ¿ 11. .... N Treasure Coast Newspapers ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA MAY 16, 2006 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE Is hereby given In accordance with Sec· tlon 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Devel· opment Code and In accordance wlth the provi- sions of the St;, Lucie County Comprehensive Plan that the following applicants have request· ed that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners considers their following re- 1. q~I~~~EL BRYANT for a Chan e In Zoning from the RS - 2 (Residential, Single~amllY - 2 IIU/ac) Zoning District to theAG ·1 (Agricultural- 1 du/ac) 20nlng District for the fo!lowing de- scribed property: 13 35 39 THAT PART OF S 112 OF SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4 L YG EL Y OF E R/W 1-95-LESS S 425 FT- (5;75' AC) (OR 692·2732). Location: West side of Bennet Roadj approxi' mately 1,950 feet south of Peterson Roao. 2 HALF HOUR CUSTOM AUDIO ,AND ACCESSORIES . for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the opera- tion of a Motor Vehicle Repair Service - Body Repair In the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District for the following described property: LEXINGTON SQUARE LOTS 13 AND 14 (1.34 AC) (OR 2051-182). Location: 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida. 3 SABIN COMPANIES, INC. fòr a Conditional Use . Permit to allow the op.eratlon of a household goods warehousing and storage mini-ware· house facility In the CG (Commercial, General) zonlnå¥Dlstrlct' for the following descrlb. ed prope : THE SOU H 1/2 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 I SOUTH. RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPTING THE EAST 560.0 FEET, AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR CANAL RIGHT OF WAy AND LESS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TOGETHER WITH: THE WEST 520.0 FEET OF ,THE EAST 560.0 FEET OF THE SOUTH 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 3S SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY" FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 FEET AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WA,Y, AND THAT CERTAIN PAR- CELCONVEYED TO THE ,BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORI- DA, FILED FOR RECORD, ,OCTOBER 12, 1988 IN O.R~B. 607, PAGE 27; PU,BLIC RECORDS OF ST. LU- CIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT- ING THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN O.R.B. 1098, PAGE 1842, AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI- DA. LESS THE WEST 742.98 FEET (8.9 ACRES) ,THEREOF. . " , ':. . Location: North side of Edwards Road, approxl' mately 250 feet west of South 25th Street. 4. SABIN COMPANIES, INC for a Change In, Zoning from the RS - 4 (Residential, Slngle·Famlly - 4 du/acre) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit Development - Orchid Place) Zoning Dls· trlct and Preliminary Planned Development Site 'Plan Approval for the following described prop- erty: THE WEST 742.98 FEET (8.9 ACRES) OF THE FOL· LOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL: THE SOUTH 112 ~F THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST, 1/4 vI' SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EX- CEPTINGTHE EAST 560.0 FEET, AND THE NORTH 96 FEET FOR CANAL, RIGHT OF WAY, AND LESS THE RIGHT-OF-WAY FOR EDWARDS ROAD TO- GETHER WITH: ' THE WEST S20.0 FEET OF THE EAST 560.0 FEET OF THE SOUTH 112 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 20, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. LESS AND EXCEPTING THE SOUTH 40 FEET AND TH~ NORTH 96 FEET FOR ROAD AND CANAL RIGHT OF WAY AND THE CERTAIN PAR· CEL CONVEYED TO THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORI· DA, FILED FOR RECORD, OCTOBER 12, 1988 IN O. R. B. 607, PAGE 27, PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LU- CIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. ALSO LESS AND EXCEPT- ING THAT CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN O.R.B. 1098, PAGE 1842, AS RECORDED IN THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORI· DA.· ' . Location: North side of Edwards Road, appro,'" mately 6SO feet west of South 25th Street. Tuesday, May 2,2006 5. TAILERS' COVE DEVELOPMENT, LLC for a Change In Zoning from the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District to the PUD (Planned Unit· Development - Tailers' Cove) Zon· Ing District, and Preliminary and Final Planned Development Site Plan Approval for the follow· Ing described property: THE NORTH 400 FEET OF PARCEL G, F.E. ENGLER'S PLAT OF SURVEY, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 7, AT PAGE 13 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LYING WEST OF STATE ROAD A-I-A. " Location: West side of SOuth SR A-1-A, directly across from Atlantis I Condominiúms 6. CHARLES AND PEGGY WARD for a Change in Zoning from the RS -2 (Residential, Slngle·Fami· Iy - 2 dU/ac) Zoning District to the AR . 1 (Agr· Icultural, Residential - 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the following described property: 13 35S 39E 13 35 39 N 112 OF N 112 OF S 112 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 -LESS W 2 AC OF SD N 112 OF S 112 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 AND LESS E 550.01 FT - (1.92 AC) (OR 1000-81: 1005·2109: 1204-1397) 13 35S 39E 13 35 39 W 510.01 FT OF E 550.01FT OF N 112 OF N 112 OF S 112 OF NE 1/4 OF NE 1/4 (1~93 AC) (OR 528-1343,1344: 1017-2312: 1204-1398) Location: 1245 South Jenkins Road, Fort Pierce, Florida. 7. JOHN WARD for a Change In Zoning from the RS -2 (Residential. Single-Family - 2 dU/ac) Zon· Ing District to the AR - 1 (Agricultural. Residen· tlal - 1 du/ac) Zoning District for the following described pro~rty: ' THE PARCEL CONTAINED WITHIN: THE SOUTH, 112 OF THE NORTH 112 OF THE SOUTH 112 OF TflE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 13, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM. THE WEST 2 ACRES OF THE SAID NORTH 1/2 OF THE SOUTH 112, OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SEC· TION 13, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ALSO LESS AND EXCEPTING THEREFROM, ROAD RIGHT - OF ·WAY. Location: 1275 South Jenkins Road, Fort Pierce, Florida. .' . The PUBliC HEARING on this Item will be held In the Commission Chambers. Roger Poitras An· nex, 3rd Floor, St. Lucie County Administration Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Flori- da on May 16. 2006, beginning at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. Action can be tak· en at this ineetinga or the item can be continued to a future date an time. All Interested persons will be gillen an opportunl-, ty to be heard. Written comments received In advance of the public hearing will also be con· sldered. Written comments to the Board of County Commissioners should be received by the Growth Management Department " Planning Divlslòlt at least 3 da!!,s prior to the scheduled hearing. The petition file is available for review at the Growth Management Department offices located at 2300 Vlrpinia Avenue., Fort Pierce. Florida. . Please cal 772/462-2822 if you have any questions or require additional Information. The file for this project may be Inspected prior to the hearing date In the Growth Management Department, 2300 Virginia Avenue. 2nd Floor. i Fort Pierce. florida. - _ ' The St., Lucie County Board of County Commis- sioners has the power to ,review and grant any , ' applications within their area of responsibility. The proceedings of the Board of County Commis- sioners are electronically recorded. PURSUANT TO, Section 286.0105. Florida Statutes. If a person decides to appeal an!!, decision made by the Board, of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record ,of the proceedings. For such purpose. he may need to, ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record Includes the testimony and evl· dence upon which the appeal Is to be ,based. UPOIt the request of any party to the proceed· lng, Individuals testifying durfng a hearing will be swørn In. Any party to the proceeding will be !l.ranted an opp'ortunlty to cross-examine 'any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hear· Ing rriay be continued from time to time as may , be necessary to a date-certain. AnYOne, with a disability requiring accommoda· tlon to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty·elght (48) hours' prior to the meet· Ing at 772/462-1m or T.D.D. 772/462-1428- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA IS! DOUG COWARD, CHAIRMAN PUBLISH DATE: May 2, 2006 Publish: May 2. 2006 1384761 ST. lUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: To allow the operation of a motor vehicle body repair service. 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida. CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Deanna 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 10. 2006. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE /~ I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): 901'11.4/(.1 /¿ß/~£"~ ( ¿?¿; J(C';;?5d~.I ~.,.2' ~ ? 5L ", Address: Date: ~(J l..;1dð ~' Signed: / q~~- Please note that any form retumed without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: ~~ e:Lé,..!'q.~ ~,.. ve 5'oP'~ I'(*? ~tA ¡L a v ~ h L4 'nt?r~ / , ;?P ,./C'!!! 4.-- ~ /ee:t.r~ .5 ,.~~, Me ~~ ,jL 4 ...,~ ~w1ed- .# Pt.-,.t'd n~e~ ~ .~ ¡ ~ ~ #' ~ ~ ~ F ~ G FILE NO. Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories - CU - 06-001. ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: To allow the operation of a motor vehicle body repair service. Regarding Property Located At: 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida. Cu"ently Zoned: CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District Received By Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Deanna 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 ,.;tlh MaOagemen\ Gro~,," ' Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 10. 2006. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE x I certify that, as of the date shown, below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): W5e~h ~:~vff' ; I: c k/ 1'1 ð ' ---;;. .eR~ c.£ Address: Date: I? /l;Y ~,d ¡JO ~ Signed: 75/>G~ ~. Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: /!!§ ~1 ~~~ . ~ ± ' ..æ . M' :2~ ---f. ::: ~~d. ~,~ -J~'I?,~LL ~ .,... ~ J~..#.-L ~ :3:r~5 ~ ~ d.e ~...........L ~~ C-&-~ ~ ,~ FILE NO. Half Hour Custom Audio and..,Acc,ssories - CU - 06-001. ~ /./ &. '_ ~~ ~~ .,¿; ~~ ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: To allow the operation of a motor vehicle body repair service. 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida. CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Deanna 2300 Vii"ginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 10. 2006. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE L./'~ 1 certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Date: JvSQ ~h G - f\\, \~ ~ ç~ ? €-~/V~ _ (\u~ ',jT \) ,-u~ 1- t ~i' /0 f & 6 Sign~d: . ,. Š -r Gt ¿u.'i},.-.c-Hùy--i Till<> Name (Please Print): Address: Please note that any form returned without a name and addre s ill not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing up request. ..¡ ..1J- Comments: Rer.e\"ed By -" ..~Ih Ma\1r"'Yl:irftom Grow," . ¡;;;. FILE NO. Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories - CU - 06-001. ST. lUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: To allow the operation of a motor vehicle body repair se~iëtt;eìver, 3y Regarding Properly Located At: 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida. Cu"ently Zoned: CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District Growth Management P/éase Return ;0: St. L.ucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Deanna 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 10. 2006. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE vi I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. . Name (Please Print): JOh1 6 f(71 /:- tfØJ¡P J' . II/I? /rt9-r;. ¿ -- ten" ,ß"f . !-ss¿lc/<~¡-e5 lo.tJt 57 t tl' {I t¡ h Address: .~ /----_/ /' Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned , forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Date: ~o/ß I: Signed: Comments: FILE NO. Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories - CU - 06-001. ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: To allow the operation of ~otor vehicle body repair servic:\ CS~ , '" :/~~-h~ 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida. CUffently Zoned: CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District Received By Please Return To: S1. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - A TIN: Deanna 2300 Virginia Avenue, F1. Pierce, FL 34982 Growth Management Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 10.2006. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE )( r I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property9wner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. .J;;v t~ ~~Sl1~ térc, i>. S.L fL "S'"Vt ~~ Name (Please Print): Address: , Date: l{..~ Signed: ~.~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All retumed forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: ..:L:t Ius L ~iS~d«. 'ÚJ "'Y ft,,,,,,sd)J jz Iwk'J ·~~~;~r~~~~1t~ no is£. II r!¡ AU,r1f :.... if,.v- <n1N\. ~ - 1N c ~~ ~ (Df"~ FILE NO. Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories - CU - 06-001. ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. Received By The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: To allow the operation of a motor vehicle body repair service'Growth Management 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida. CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Deanna 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, Fl 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 10. 2006. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE xx I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): Thomas A. Leonard, for Leonard Property Corp. 9300 N.E. 4 Avenue, Miami Shores, FL 33138 Address: Date: affected property addreS..~itageDrive., PSL May 2,2006 Signed: ,; ~ ~~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and availabJe for viewing upon request. " .. ,..'-----:} /L ~~~.:~:~:" . My only concern is that groundwater and land be protected FILE NO. from potential contamination from paint ann ~olvp-nt rp-~idue. As my property is directly adjacent, and wetland .drainagearea connects our properties, any runoff from subject property will directly affect my property .wi th contamination. Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories - CU - 06-001. ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: To allow the operation of a motor vehicle body repair service. 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida. CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District Please Return To: ,St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division -ATTN: Deanna' 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 10. 2006. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE ~ I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. J2L ,kIJOE71" f '-;'j t;; 770 ' )/Jc..I¿/^(_<;'C)~· I Name (Please print): Address: I ¡;/r? /07 /5,F' . Date: ~ - !!. ~C)Cp Signed: Please note that any form returned without a name and address will no be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. /7"" U0dC-â S<-éE/n //ZCC /1 ¿¿ôòç¿ bee; 7::- 5'-7-0..0 4/'../ v A??..?'i7/· ¿'A/'/:7 / -& P//"T7/ A/ ¿.,.. ¿;r /;' L' _ . ~ / ' /. ~ IS' /' ~l '7£'=:- ""2 /é:,,? , ~' 'T- f é..¿¿ . J¥:nd; 7f: ;L;;¿;;;L 2' ..::;~ K~Es, Receive 'i FILE NO. Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories - CU - 06-001. Comments: Growth Managemep\ ST. lUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: To allow the operation of a motor vehicle body repair service. Regarding Properly Located At: 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida. Received BV Currently Zoned: CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Deanna 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Growth Management Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 10. 2006. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE 'i- I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): Jt11h" G ll~ \, ~ 77/ Sar,~L r0" I -Q-/()/ /0 , I , Signed: '~.s l.}:1 ?--/9s:L.. , ¥</'/ . Address: Date: - Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. .AII returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments, 9L /#: .~~:'1/~~-Q:"- a.. ef ~ r'~./ /~-~ J~~..t":"J _~<Á - ,.&.- ''''J~_'I FILE NO. Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories - CU - 06-001. Ha~ 04 OS 10:10a 772-871-1585 p.l ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the faVorable vote of four-fifths (415) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: To allow the operation of a motor vehicle body repair service. 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida. CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management PIaMing Division - ATTN: Deanna 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce. FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and. return by: Mav 10. 2006. I diN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE )( I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. - ; c")("\ "__ I' '-. .~...... tr"'" ., -..-.} f.._1J ~~ ~ 1 . ~-~ N~!:'Tï:-: ST. LUCIE Bt'v';;}l \^.!...\~~·:s r:(1).~inOL r'!;::T~-~ICT Name (Please Print): --7-.. Z--:.~"i s. ,"':~'~'~'1'\:~~'9 Address: FT. P:C¡:¡CE. FL 3·~S31 . ~ ~. --Æ ß.-L Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be co1ered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Date: --- ¡ :7-,:"1-( , I ~ 1....:,... Signed: Comments: FILE NO. Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories - CU - 06-001. ----_._.-. ST. lUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Pròperly Located At: Currently Zoned: To allow the operation of a motor vehicle body repair service. 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida. CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division -ATTN: Deanna 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 10. 2006. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE 'I- I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): Ca'rUlt V~(~ (01 ~-, D Ic..K.·\t'\S~.., Tè."(f J P<;L- PL 3'-19 ~:J- Address: Date: ~ Signed: (2 ~ C¿~~. ~ Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: Received By Grovlth Managel11Ant FILE NO. Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories - CU - 06-001. ST. LUCIE' COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01(C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: To allow the operation of a motor vehicle body repair service. Regarding Property Located At: 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida. CUffently Zoned: CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District ReCe\\led B'/ Please Return To: 81. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Deanna 2300 Virginia Avenue, F1. Pierce, FL 34982 en"\ent ...t'h Manag Ii' GfOvv\. Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 10. 2006. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE ) )( I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED COND SE ~-..._. I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): ~~e¿T EeRZLu. c, 7 7~ b /c.j¿',.; S-ê>tV 7ë¡("e. Date: 5/t;/JDO' I , Signed: P S L. FL. 3«9.s-~ tJ~ Address: Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: Þl.eA.se See 3 ~'?Je l-e77eÆ. IITrlldeÅ p~/ ¡/flip l7,d i'·'\ FILE NO. Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories - CU - 06-001. .;t'¥,'f'" " - ~¡t/S'TiIv¡ ¡!ðllf E?J Halt Hour Custom Audio and Accessories 1. 140 ~ J , 141 j CG 7 142 oning I I I 1 I 3 I I I I / 132 1n 134- ,135, 136' ì---.. "'- 38 131 r - 31 44 4 ;;- 43 ~J ~ 6 ~~ ¿¡L 41 If 1 ~, J - ............ ' ~ 161 .. ,SANDBERG LN 4 s.. 160 : 3 7 1$ t --'- , r J"'\.¡;)-4f 2 2 8 151 151 1 1 10 . 156, .\..: """I!' V( fs ,- '. 155 154 153 152 1.51 ( I I I I I 1 1 ,.61 r'1" 143 ¡-- 144 9 1--"- 145 \ \14;- 1 -- 147 t-- '~ 148 " \.-- 150 149 NSLRDD CANAL. NO. 28 L=d 1. . I", .' ,#} --fJe¡¡)()Tes JltJh') e.s' ~ Subject property' - _ /30 ,~ II RS-4 ~ , 28 t ) ) 27 ) ) .- ;U 06-001 PUD 2 131 , .......... 4 5r' ~ I 3 2 ~ :I: 9 WILlIAMSBURG WAY ~ (I) :) rn CG 16 15 11: C :Ie U 8 ~ :I: ,- i I 1 8 t 1 I I I I . _ t ~ w ~ VØ7~ ffi ~~ 18 ::z: !%/.I'I //~ r.Q//0 ---- ----- '// ~ 19 @i; ~ ~~ 20 ~~' 17 - - -. - - - - i - I t 9 I I I ' I I ... ~ _' I ¡ \ 12 10 ... rn ::I (I.) 10 21 11 11;£ 3;4) ;e~ r, -IS -P101 i2~ "'_1- _ __ _._ _k._1 I . NSLRDO CANAL. ,.,-B~UAN CIR PNRD "- RM..9 , t~G CG 9:- ~~ tfw..~_ ~-d.--V'.....1IIIf D9-'~ N A Map prepared March 13, 2006 AprII2Stn,2006 Board of Saint Lucie County CoI;nmissloners 2300 VJrgfnla Avenue Fort Pierce, R. 34982 Re: Planning &. Zoning April 2fJ'h Meeting - Half Hour CustDm Audio and Accessories; Agenda Item #7 Dear Honorable Commissioners: The Homeowners of Oleander Pines stronglY urge the COmmission to unanimously deny the request for a Conditional Use Permit by Half Hour CUstom A~iO and Acxessories to operate an autobodypalnt and repair shop located at 6900 Heritage Drive, Port Saint lucie. Despite concerns voiced by residents within our œmmunity to the Planning and Zoning Board at Its April 2Cf'1 meeting, the Board voted to reœmmend thiS issue come before the,County Commission and for the Conditional Use Pennit be approved. This recommendation was made despite concerns raised about the objection to the inaease in noise' due to the use of sanders, metal grinders, Impact guns, hammering, the continuous operation of air compressors, as well as the probable lnaease In emissions of noxious fumes. Many of these same concerns were raiSed by P & Z Chairman Hearn before publiC to be heard, who hlmsef recanted his previous experiences as, "...almost unbearable" while attempting to operate' his own business next to an autobody repair shop. The Homeowners of Oleander Pines believe the decision to recommend approval of the Conditional Use Permit was a mistake based on outrlated and inaccurate information provided to the P &. Z Board. We also feel the proposed operation of an autobody repair shop does not fit in accordance with the surrounding community, residential or commercial. Upon commencement of review of the applicant's request, it was noted immediately by several residents In attendance the aerial photqgraphs and color coded overhead- slides presented by county staff were between 3 and 3 'h years-old. The slides showed all of the residential properties within Oleander Pines on the east side of Dickinson Terrace as vacant, unimproved property, with the remaining parcels within Phase n as partialty constructed. The slides also showed lush vegetatJve buffers between the commerdal parcels on Heritage Drive and the residential parcels to the west on DIckinson Terrace and Sandburg lane. ~ mentioned, this has not been the case for over 3-years. However, this fact was unknown by œunty staff and the Planning &_Zonlng Board until public to be heard. In fact, the minutes to this meeting Will show earlier agenda Items vvere debated between P &. Z board members and county staff due to the presentation of outdated InfonnatJon. As concerned åtlzens who wish to discuss the facts as they are raltler than as they were, what level of mnfldence are we expected to have In the decisions made by'the Planning &. Zoning Board when the information they are provided does not fairly represent the issues under consideration? It is perhaps for this reason, in reference to is previous agenda Item, at least one of the board members openly questioned whether mistakes were made In approving zoning and density per acre modifications that are inœnsiStent with other parœls in its surrounding area. Perhaps the greatest cause for concern we as residents have is the potential the ranks of the commercial businesses to our east will continue to grow unremittingly In numbers, as well as In nuisance, because the requirements of barriers and set-backs between commercial and residential remain unaddressed. On any given day and lasting Into much of the afternoon and evening, the obnoxious sights, smells and sounds from this commercJal district on Heritage Drive bombard the senses of the residents of Oleander PInes on a continual basfs. The busine5$eS on the south end of Herftage Drtve typICally operate part-time In their stated business, part-time as an outdoor kennel and part-time as a sewage dump station, where caged dogs belonging to the friends and relatives of the business owners are left unattended and where RV's have been seen emptying their septic tanks into the drainage canal behind our development. On the north end of Heritage Drive, an actualliœnsed kennel operates where itS usual tenanŒ bark the night away, much to the chagrin of sleep-depr1Ved residents whose homes immediately border the kennel and whose homes have a direct line-of-sight view rI its dog runs. In the middle of the block there Is an automotive repair œnœr where at least two to three times per day residents are jolted from their reclining chairs as engines rev, race and roar, all highlighted by the sound of tires chirping and burning rubber. And last, but not least, are the sounds from Half Hour Custom Audio and Acœssorles that last well Into the evening. That relentless bass sound, the sound of audio technicians testing the limits of newly- Installed audio systems. It Is a sound the residents of Oleander Pines have come to dread and despise. It Is a sound that Is totally unnerving and aggravating as we can do little but watch the windows, walls and sliding glass doors of our homes shake, rattle al1(l roll. It is a totally aggravating sound when, as you walk outside to spend time In the,peaœ and serenity of your own back yard, you are blasted back Inside Bgaln by a soundwave tsunami. However, there Is no, need to worry about sleeping-in too late and miss any of the noise. The banging, slamming, danglng sound of Waste Management garbage trucks emptying commercfal dumpsters up and down the stretch of Herttage Drfve happens everyday,lnduding Saturdays, between 6:15 a.m. and 6:30 a.m. More than one member of the P &. Z Board told us our solution to these nuisances is to call code enforcement. They believe code enforcement will solve all our problems and somehow make our un-neighborfy commercial neighbors to the east act In a more responsible manner. Unfortunately, many of our experiences with code enforcement, because of the tfme of day In which oomplalnts are filed, have been handled by the Sheriff's Department. As learned from experience, the Sheriffs Department simpiy has more important matters to attend to. And when repeated complaints regarding mde violations are submitted to the varfous cnunty agencies, it has become dear the attitude received by our residents from those taking Our calls is the only nuisances in Oleander Pines are those 'Who are filing cnmplaints. At least one member of the Board asked what happened to the vegetative buffers that préViòlJsly existed between the commetdal and residential properties, and who authorized Its removal? As was explained during public to be heard, the drainage canal between the two properties is privately owned by Wynne Building Corporation, the developer of Oleander Pines. To satisfy the commerdal business owners on Heritage Drive whO have complained sinœ the 2004 hurricanes regarding excessive f\cx)ding and limited access to their businesses due to flooding, Wynne Builders took It upon themselves to upgrade the retention ponds on Heritage Drive, also owned by Wynne Builders, and to strip the drainage canal dean of any vegetation and overgrowth to improve drainage along Heritage Drive. The question that arises from the perspective of the Homeowners of Oleander Pines is, how are the actions taken by Wynne Building COrporation fair to them? How Is it that the utility of one property Is allowed to be Improved at the expense and devaluation of others? Where Is the equity and faimess of cnnslderatlon for the peaceful, quiet, law-abiding, tax·paying citizens of this community who have unfairlv had the value of their homes diminished because of the actions and poor planning cI one developer? How Is one developer allowed to act In the best interesœ of his œmmerdal constituents to whom he Is beholden, at the expense of his residential constituents to whom he Is beholden no longer? Chairman Heam said It best when he exclaimed thEt nuisances OJrrently being endured by the residents of Oleander Pines Is the result of, "poor planning." We agree with O1alrman Hearn's assessment. However, the question not asked of Mr. Heam was, who Is It that recommends approval of these plans? Earlier in the evening in reference to a different agenda Item under consideration by the Board, several slides were shown of a proposed PUD. An arUst's rendition and architectural drawings of several proposed building elevations within the PUD, Including an integrated ten·foot privac.y wall designed to serve as the perimeter of the PUD was shown. It was explained by the applicant that this wall was designed to minimize the impact of actiVities taking place within the PUD on the neighbors outside the proposed development. Although we are unable to say if this type of design structure where privacy walls are constructed to minimize the impact into and out of residential developments is required, how Is It In the case of Oleander Pines absolutely no permanent structure or barrier was required to be built between It and the commen:lalpropertfes along Heritage Drive? How is it no barrier has been.requlred to be built In the place of the natural buffer which has since been removed? At this meeting, Planning Director Bob Nix stated this Situation would be, "looked Into". We await Mr. Nb(s findings and urge the OHJnty Commission to expect an answer to this question when this agenda Item comes before them. But it Is for these reasons we, the residents of Oleander Pines, urge the Board of County Commissioners to reject the request by Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories for a cnnditional use pennit to operate an ·2- autobody painting and repair shop. We request this on the grounds that an autobody painting and repair shop is inconsistent with the residential and commercial properties In the surrounding area and will only further diminish the quality of life and property values for residents as well as other business owners in the area. We also urge the request for a conditional use permit be rejected due to the "poor planning" referenœd by Chairman Hearn whIch has resulted In the nuisances currently endured by residents within our community. We request these problems be fully addressed and rectified before any additional changes to zoning or conditional use permits in said area are granted. We feel It is unfair to the residents of our community for the existing problems to be compounded by authoriZing new conditional use permits for even more commerdaVindustr1a1 business activities when oversights and injustices as a result of "poor planning" have not yet been resolved. Respettfuly, R,/d ~ - I1ltlb Oleander Pines Home Owners Association and the Residents of Oleander Pines - 3· Board of County Commission Review: 05/16/2006 File Number CU-06-001 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF GROWTH MANAGEMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners DATE: Bob Nix, AICP - Growth Management Director Hank Flores, Planning Manager~ May 16, 2006 THROUGH: FROM: SUBJECT: Agenda Item 5H Petition of Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories, Inc., for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the operation of a motor vehicle body repair service in the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District. This memorandum is intended to provide additional information on the above referenced request. The subject property is located at 6900 Heritage Drive, which is on the east side of Heritage Drive in the Lexington Square Commercial Subdivision. The Lexington Square Commercial Subdivision is located directly to the east of the Oleander Pines Replat Subdivision. The actual location for the requested conditional use permit to allow motor vehicle repair service including body repair, is located approximately 256 feet east from the adjacent property lines of the Oleander Pines Replat Subdivision. Please see attached map. The subject property is cross hatched. Several residents of the Oleander Pines Subdivision appeared at the April 20, 2006. Planning and Zoning Commission meeting to voice concerns over the removal of vegetation from the 40 foot drainage and utility easement located on the western property line of the Lexington Square Subdivision. In addition, to the 40 foot drainage and utility easement in Lexington Square Subdivision, there is a 10 foot utility easement along the rear property lines of Lot 137 thru Lot 149 in the Oleander Pines Subdivision. Upon being made aware of the removal of vegetation, staff contacted the Environmental Resource Department, who inspected the site and confirmed that vegetation had been removed and without a permit. The Code Enforcement Division has also been advised of the situation. They have stated that they would investigate. To date staff has not received an update. Lexington Square Subdivision was platted in January 1984. Following is a list of the current owners and when the buildings were constructed. 10 Owner: Gill, Jr., Fred C & 0 Walton, LLC Lexington Square Condominium Phase I (Several owners) Lexington Square Condominium Phase II (Several owners) Flm Associates, Inc. Year developed: Built 1992 Built 1988 Built 1986 Lot: 5&6 7 8 9 Built 1987 Built 1989 The original Oleander Pines Subdivision was platted in January 1990. Oleander Pines Replat Subdivision was platted in May 2001. The following is a list of owners of the lots located on the eastern property line of Oleander Pines Subdivision and when their homes were constructed. Lot: 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 Owner: Sullivan, Peter Jennett, Paul & Barbara Berzler, Robert & Patricia Ames, Paul & Kathleen Duckworth, Jerry & Paula Kaminski, Roman & Marianna Mariano, Henry & Linda Duda, Antoni & Stefania Vanca, Carole Kaminski, Joseph & Danuta Florio, Michael & Matries Clarke, Gary & Julie Glenn, Denise & Walter Year developed: Built 2004 Built 2003 Built 2004 Built 2004 Built 2004 Built 2004 Built 2003 Built 2004 Built 2004 Built 2004 Built 2003 Built 2003 Built 2004 The aerials provided and included in the staff report were taken in February, 2003 and explains why the homes are not shown. The following are the minimum code requirements for landscaped buffer areas between non-residential and residential development as provided in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - Adopted August 1, 1990: Section 7.09.04 (E) LANDSCAPED BUFFER AREAS BETWEEN NON-RESIDENTIAL OR RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE(S) HOUSING THREE OR MORE DWELLING UNITS AND SINGLE FAMILY OR TWO FAMILY RESIDENTIAL USES All side and rear yard perimeter buffer areas between non-residential or residential structure(s) housing three or more dwelling units and single family or two family residential uses shall be landscaped with a masonry wall or opaque wood fence of at least eight (8) feet in height that forms a continuous screen between the uses. All masonry walls or opaque wood fences shall be landscaped with a continuous hedge along both the inside and outside base of the wall or fence. One tree shall be planted along the wall or fence for each thirty (30) linear feet or major fraction thereof of the length of the wall or fence. The following are the minimum code requirements for landscaped buffer areas between non-residential and residential development as provided in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code - Adopted July 1, 1984 Section 3.2.640.5 LANDSCAPED BUFFER AREAS BETWEEN NON-RESIDENTIAL AND RESIDENTIAL USES Buffer areas between non-residential and residential uses shall be landscaped with a wall or hedge or other durable landscaped barrier of at least five (5) feet in height that forms a continuous screen between the uses. If such barrier is of non-living material, one (1) shrub or vine shall be provided for every five (5) linear feet of the barrier or major fraction thereof on the side of the barrier toward the residential uses. In addition, one (1) tree having at leastfour and one-half (4-1/2) inches diameter four (4) feet above the ground shall be provided for each thirty (30) linear feet or major fraction thereof of buffer area. Staff would like to recommend an additional condition of approval: The subject property shall upgrade all site landscaping to comply with the regulations of Section 7.09.00 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Attached are Conditional Use Response Forms received after the petition packets were distributed. C) C) ~-'''---8-_L- {'] ~ t'} I - <:JI I V 0----- 0 0 0 AMH ~ sn :E AMH ~ sn 0:: - ----r-,--- --.------, ------ ¡ ~a >I::>O::>N\fH C) j i C) i C) C) 0 ~ :J 0 I C) C) 0 C) C) C) 0 ._______J 0:: 0 0 0 ;:) m C) (/) C) C) C) ----_._--- :E 0 0 0 I 0 ~ ...J I C) ...J C) 0 ~ C) 0 0 L____ / --( ('-. C) C) C) 0 0 0 ~ 0:: 0 ;% a: ;% a: ~ (/) 0:: ~ 0:: ~ ~ (/) a: a: ~ ~ (/) a: 0:: ~ ~ (/) a: 0:: ~ ~ (/) a: 0:: ~ ~ ~ a: en a: 0 ~ ~ ~ (/) 0:: 0 0:: i _._--_._---~- i ... "7 3^\f ~3aN\f310 ~ 'T ;Z ;Z ~ ;X ;% I I I . I 0:: a: I --~------r-X!-'ì rtTi-rtl < < 0:: 0:: 0:: 0:: II:: a: 0:: 0:: ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes . The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: To allow the operation of a motor vehicle body repair service. 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida. CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Deanna 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 10. 2006. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE y/ I certify that, as of the date shown below, lama property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): (J)Al1tL. íR.. ~LtN,J ~ f)/a¡¿//J$()A) ~£, j POll'" sr. L/Jß/£ , FLI M~ , . Address: Date: ó/¡ /06 . I Signed: ~<iß·- ~ Please note that any form retumed without a name and address will not be considered. forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Clv . ,eå ~" t\ece\\! All returned Comments: ,....,J" ,,^9.(ïd~ '" , O(O~'(\ fiLE NO. Half Hour .custom Audio and Accessories - CU - 06-001. ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: To allow the operation of a motor vehicle body repair service. Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida. CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District Please Return To: St. Lucie County, Department of Growth Management Planning Division - ATTN: Deanna 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 10. 2006. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE t/ I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): C::;':e(] V \e'z- ~;)(¡ ~~+rl~<:1XJ~ ~ Signed: &OA1. \k~ cr Address: Date: Please note that any form returned without a name and address will not be considered. All returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. Comments: FILE NO. Half Hour Custom Audio and Accessories - CU - 06-001. ST. lUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL USE RESPONSE FORM Section 11.07.01 (C) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code provides that where a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit is signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, any such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. The Applicant Proposes The Following Conditional Use: Regarding Property Located At: Currently Zoned: Piease Return ïo: To allow the operation of a motor vehicle body repair service. 6900 Heritage Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida. CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District St. Lucie County, Department of Growth ívianagt:loent Planning Division - A TIN: Deanna 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Mav 10. 2006. I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE ,/ I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): Address: Date: Pleé torn , , I " , Ùj ..., ,....,. ì "; (""").. '"7,..-:;,¡ I t,..--j J' .J,.; . , -" Received By 'j/'I' ", " ",' Co ¡, I' I 'j - .\ tL tIt ('lif v{ (,L (,'¿, U ~ et' /,' v+ FILl ~ ' N\ ; dy,{(~J ¡) ~d \;\;tt n' e ) r I u r ,J -11 Lf 3 D \(J~ ',,"I S v'1é( (QCê. V.:, r{ <) t' IAJ ( It , ) '-( q to) z" /5/illL ~'õ11tG1h :j~,~ÌL Signed: I"'..J..-j .,. r- ,'" , \ , e and address will not be considered. All returned or viewing upon request. ,"--:-' ;..Þ ,# ..' '- ,.'·c)t. l f' - -it , ~ ) / "\ Growth Management -I f I (~r-l '':> '-j-- ¡¿ 1ätr - ( (')1. (!(~ ¡ories - CU - 06-001. -, - AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO.~ DATE: May 16,2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING Leg. [ ] Quasi-JD [x] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): County Attorney J oAnn Riley Property Acquisition Manager SUBJECT: Petition for Abandonment Abandon a portion of an unopened 50-foot right-of-way known as Boyington Road Resolution 06-123 BACKGROUND: Please see attached Memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Resolution No. 06-123, instruct staff to publish the final Notice of Abandonment, record Resolution No. 06-123, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Intent to Abandon, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Public Hearing, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Abandonment in the Public Records of St. Lucie County. j(] APPROVED [ ] OTHER [ ] DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: Approved 5-0 Dou s . nderson County Administrator [x] County Attorney: ¡,} [x] Originating Dept: :Jt,^~ Review and Approvals [x] Road and Bridge: ð ¡. J JMf- [x] Engineering:~ [x] Public Works:~ [ ] Purchasing: PROPERTY ACQUISITION DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: JoAnn Riley, Property Acquisition Manager DATE: May 16, 2006 SUBJECT: Public Hearing Abandon a portion of an unopened 50-foot right-of-way known as Boyington Road Resolution 06-123 BACKGROUND: The Property Acquisition Division received a request to abandon an unopened, un-maintained, 50-foot right-of- way known as Boyington Road. St. Lucie County received this right-of-way from the North St. Lucie River Drainage District in 1931. The contributed property was an un-excavated, surplus drainage right-of-way. The right-of-way deed provided for reversion of title to the District if the road was discontinued as such. The petitioned site was never improved or opened as a public road or highway in the 75 years the County has owned the pr9perty. The District has signed a consent form approving the abandonment. The County abandoned the portion of Boyington Road to the South in 1981. New Life Christian Centre of the Treasure Coast purchased the parent tract of 56 acres. The purchase was for Church investment in furtherance of aims and objective of the Church. The petition site road severs the acreage, and its abandonment is necessary in order to plan for the ultimate use, disposition or development of the property. Abandonment of the petitioned site is needed in order for the property to achieve its highest and best condition for future use. RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends the Board approve Resolution No. 06-123, instruct staff to publish the final Notice of Abandonment, record Resolution No. 06-123, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Public Hearing and Proof of Publication of the Notice of Abandonment in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Respectfully submitted, c4 rÄ,,- :p~ '~oAnn Riley Property Acquisition Manager i '" iii jj o¡ŒEC1IOfIEE IU> legend Parcel 3210-131-0001-000/4' Boyington Rd Abandonment ~ .. ~ ... .. :r ~ g- This instrument prepared by: Janet LiCausi, under the direction of Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 RESOLUTION NO. 06-123 DATE: May 16, 2006 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, CLOSING, VACATING AND ABANDONING ANY INTEREST OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC IN A PORTION OF AN UNOPENED, UN-MAINTAINED 50-FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY KNOWN AS BOYINGTON ROAD. SAID RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING IN SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, RECORDED INDEED BOOK BOOK 83, PAGE 384 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. That Sections 177.101,336.09 and 336.10, Florida Statutes, as amended, and Section 11.10.01 et. seq. of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, provide that the County may adopt resolutions vacating rights-of-way in whole or in part, which are under the jurisdiction of the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida. 2. Pursuant to Deed Book 83, Page 384, St. Lucie County and the general public have a dedicated interest in the following describ~d land: That part of the following described parcel which lies in the South Y2 of the North Y2 of Section 10, Township 36 South, Range 38 East, St. Lucie County, Florida LESS AND EXCEPT the North 5 feet of such part of parcel: Beginning at a point twenty-five (25) feet west of the quarter comer between Section 10 and 15, Township 36 South, Range 38 East, thence north, parallel with quarter section line, to intersection with State Road Right-of-Way, thence east, fifty (50) feet, thence south parallel with quarter section line to the south line of said Section, 10, thence west, fifty (50) feet to point of beginning, containing six (6) acres, more or less (as conveyed by North St. Lucie River Drainage District by right-of-way deed dated February 16, 1931, recorded in Deed Book 83, Page 384, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida.) 1 The Petition Site road severs the acreage, and its abandonment is necessary in order to plan for New Life Christian Centre of the Treasure Coast to achieve its highest and best condition for future use of the property. 3. A Notice ofIntent to Abandon was advertised on February 11,2006 and February 18,2006 and no objections were filed. 4. All relevant public utilities have given written consent for the abandonment. 5. County Department Staff members have reviewed the petition and have filed no objections to the proposed abandonment. 6. All abutting property owners have filed consent forms and approve the abandonment. 7. On April 4, 2006, the Board of County Commissioners approved Permission to Advertise for a Public Hearing on May 16,2006. 8. On May 1,2006, a Notice of Public Hearing was advertised in the Fort Pierce Tribune. 9. It is in the best interest of the public to vacate and abandon the right-of-way more particularly described as follows: That part of the following described parcel which lies in the South ~ of the North ~ of Section 10, Township 36 South, Range 38 East, St. Lucie County, Florida LESS AND EXCEPT the North 5 feet of such part of parcel: Beginning at a point twenty-five (25) feet west of the quarter comer between Section 10 and 15, Township 36 South, Range 38 East, thence north, parallel with quarter section line, to intersection with State Road Right-of-Way, thence east, fifty (50) feet, thence south parallel with quarter section line to the south line of said Section, 10, thence west, fifty (50) feet to point of beginning, containing six (6) acres, more or less (as conveyed by North St. Lucie River Drainage District by right-of-way deed dated February 16, 1931, recorded in Deed Book 83, Page 384, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida.) NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: That a portion of the unopened, un-maintained 50-foot deeded right-of-way of Boyington Road more particularly described as follows: 2 That part of the following described parcel which lies in the South YS of the North YS of Section 10, Township 36 South, Range 38 East, St. Lucie County, Florida LESS AND EXCEPT the North 5 feet of such part of parcel: Beginning at a point twenty-five (25) feet west of the quarter comer between Section 10 and 15, Township 36 South, Range 38 East, thence north, parallel with quarter section line, to intersection with State Road Right-of-Way, thence east, fifty (50) feet, thence south parallel with quarter section line to the south line of said Section, 10, thence west, fifty (50) feet to point of beginning, containing six (6) acres, more or less (as conveyed by North S1. Lucie River Drainage District by right-of-way deed dated February 16, 1931, recorded in Deed Book 83, Page 384, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida.) is hereby closed, vacated and abandoned and the right, title and interest of St. Lucie County and the general public in and to said lands hereby disclaimed and renounced. Chairman Doug Coward Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Paula Lewis Commissioner Chris Craft Commissioner Joseph Smith PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 16h day of May, 2006 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: CHAIRMAN DEPUTY CLERK APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: COUNTY ATTORNEY 3 ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PETITION FOR ABANDONMENT TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. The undersigned PETITIONER hereby petitions the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners to vacate, abandon, discontinue and close, in whole or in part, specific public rights-of-way, easements, or subdivision plats, as more particularly described in this petition, and to renounce and disclaim any right of the County and the public in and to any land in connection therewith. This petition is filed pursuant to law as more particularly set forth in Florida Statutes, Section 177.101, as amended, Florida Statutes, Sections 336.09 and 336.10, as amended, and St. Lucie County Land Development Code, Section 11.10.01 et. seq. ****************************************************************************************************** TYPE OF ABANDONMENT REQUESTED (check one or more as applicable) ("*" indicates requirement for public hearing) _ A Plat (*) _ A Portion of a Plat (*) ~ County Road Right-of-way (*) _ Drainage Easement not Affecting Road Drainage _ Public Utility Easement _ Drainage Easement Affecting Road Drainage (*) Other _ Public Interest in a Private Right-of-way or Easement ****************************************************************************************************** Petitioner hereby certifies that the filing fee of $250.00 is enclosed or has been paid to St. Lucie County, and that petitioner hereby further certifies that petitioner understands that the filing fee is non-refundable and that there is no assurance that this petition will be granted, in whole or in part, and no such assurances have been made by any County employee. This Petition shall contain an affidavit of the Petitioner attesting to the validity of the representations herein and it's completeness to the best of Petitioner's knowledge and belief. 1. The Legal Description of the petition site is attached as (EXHIBIT "A"), (Note: The petition site may lie upon property owned by Petitioner, i.e. an easement over Petitioner's property, or adjacent to Petitioners property, i.e. a public road right-of-way.) 2. Title or interest of the County and the Public in and to the petition site was acquired and is evidenced by: Right-ai-Way Deed (Plat Book and identification, Deed, or other title evidence) recorded in: Deed Book 83, pa~e 384 (Plat Book and Page, Deed Book and Page, or Official Record Book and Page) Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 3. Attached hereto as (EXHIBIT "B") is a sketch, accurately drawn, depicting the petition site as described in (EXHIBIT "A"), showing boundaries of abutting properties, any encroachments, drainage and/or utility easements, any structures within the petition site, and property benefiting from the abandonment. A copy of a portion of the appropriate tax map (8 t x 11), obtainable from the Property Appraisers Office, may be used for this purpose. 4. Attached hereto as (EXHIBIT "C") is a location map which clearly and legibly identifies the location of the petition site in relation to the nearest public right-of-way and all affected properties (properties within a minimum 300 foot radius of the petition site). A copy of a portion of the appropriate tax map (8 t x 11), obtainable from the Property Appraisers Office, may be used for this purpose. 5. Attached hereto as (EXHIBIT "D") is a list of property owners, including correct mailing addresses, property tax Identification number and legal descriptions of surrounding affected properties. (Note: County Staff may request additional information if it is determined that the proposed abandonment could have a negative effect on properties located more than 300 feet from the petition site.) 6. Attached hereto as (EXHIBIT "E") is a list of abutting property owners, including correct mailing addresses, property tax Identification number and legal descriptions of the adjacent properties. Such owners of abutting properties have signed a notarized statement consenting to the abandonment of public right-of-way and such signed statements are attached hereto as (EXHIBIT liE -1", liE - 2". etc.) 7. Attached hereto as (EXHIBIT "F"). consecutively numbered "F -1", "F - 2". etc.. the signed consent of any affected utility providing service to or within the petition site and/or drainage district having jurisdiction over the petition site. 8. The Petitioner hereby certifies that in the event this petition is granted, the abandonment of the public right- . of-way will not prevent other property owners from access to and from their property, and no other property owner in the vicinity will be adversely affected. 9. The Petitioner hereby certifies that the petition site is not a right-of-way which is part of or used for any State of Federal highway purposes; and that such right-of-way is under the control and jurisdiction of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners. 10. The Petitioner hereby certifies that the petition site is not a public accessway to any publicly accessible waters in the County, or that if the petition site proposed to be abandoned does provide such access, Petitioner hereby offers to trade or give the County comparable land or lands necessary for public access to the same body of water. 11. The petitioner hereby certifies that petitioner is the owner of property underlying or adjacent to the petition site as evidenced by an instrument recorded in Official Record Book 22I?Page~, St. Lucie County, Florida, a copy of which is attached as (EXHIBIT "G"). i903 and 1905 12. The petitioner hereby certifies that all property taxes upon the Petition site, or petitioner's property adjacent to the petition site, are paid and current, or exempt from taxation, and a copy of a paid tax bill or statement of the County Tax Collector is attached hereto as (EXHIBIT "H"). 13. The Petitioner hereby certifies: (CIRCLE "a" OR "b" BELOW) o that the petition site to be abandoned is NOT within the limits of any municipality, OR b) that the petition site to be abandoned lies within the corporate limits of and attached is their resolution of abandonment of the petition site as (EXHIBIT lOr). 14. The Petitioner hereby submits a statement (EXHIBIT IIJ") in support of this petition which states Petitioner's reasons for requesting the abandonment and the use to which the Petitioner intends for the land. 15. Petitioner hereby certifies that a NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE A PETITION FOR ABANDONMENT has been published once weekly for two (2) consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the County. The name of the newspaper and dates of publication are as follows: The Fort Pierce Tribune (Name of newspaper in which Notice of Intent was published) February 11, 2006 (First date published) February 18, 2006 I (Second date published) A COpy OF THE PROOf OF PUBLICATION SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THIS PETITION AS (EXHIBIT "K"). NOTICE TO PETITIONER; If THE ABANDONMENT REQUESTED REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT TO LAW, PETITIONER SHALL BE GIVEN NOTICE TO POST A SIGN (17" x 24" OR 17" x 17") UPON THE PETITION SITE IN A CONSPICUOUS AND EASILY VISIBLE LOCATION, ABUTTING A PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE, WHEN POSSIBLE, AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING GIVING NOTICE OF THE TIME AND DATE Of THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PETITION TO ABANDON OR VACATE. THIS PETITION MUST BE EXECUTED BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC DATE: c2 ·)~·Ô ro By: Ronald McCaskill, Pastor Its President BY~~~~ , Terr I E. Redden Its Church Administrator Petitioner's Address: 5555 St. James Dr. Port St. Lucie, FL 34983 772-878-8732 Petitioner's Phone Number STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE Before me this day personally appeared RONALD McCASKILL and TERRELL E. REDDEN, President and Church Administrator, respectively, of NEW LIFE CHRISTIAN CENTRE OF THE TREASURE COAST, INC., who, being duly sworn, did depose and say: That New Life Christian Centre of the Treasure Coast, Inc., is the Petitioner; and That all of the representations and information provided in the Petition are true and accurate to the best of Petitioner's knowledge, information and belief. -4-~ -¡ Subscribed and sworn to before me this 28 day of '"fe-by (..{A (ï Ronald McCaskill and Terrell E. Redden, ,2006, by V" who personally appeared before me and v who are personally known to me. whose identity I proved on the basis of whose identity I proved on the oath/affirmation of a credible witness pr;nt~~p~ Notary Public [Notary Seal] ø MARY BOESCH MY COMMISSION;; DD 138747 EXPIRES: August 1, 2006 1.eoo.~NOT AAY FL Notary Ser'licø & Bonding, Inc. ~ AFFIDA VIT ON BEHALF OF PETITIONER STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE BEFORE .ME, the undersigned authority, personally appeared this day TERRELL E. REDDEN who, upon first being duly sworn, did depose and say that: 1. He is Church Administrator and agent in this behalf for the Petitioner, NEW LIFE CHRISTIAN CENTRE OF THE TREASURE COAST, INC., and as such has knowledge of facts permitting this sworn statement. 2. He has read and examined the Petition for Abandonment and knows that the representations made therein and by the exhibits attached thereto, are true and correct to the best of his knowledge and belief on behalf of Petitioner. 3. He certifies as well that the Petition for Abandonment is complete in form and content to the best of his knowledge and belief on beh~~ione~ ~ ~~ - Church Administrator Sworn to and subscribed before me this zE> -I-U day of :¡.~ by ,,( tH' '-( , 2006, by Terrell E. Redden, who is personally known to me or '.",ho pfOdueed asJ r1 e¡:üificati on. Print~~~Lh Notary Public œ· MARY BOESCH [Notary Seal] ,MY COMMISSION # DD 138747 , EXPIRES: August 1, 2006 1,aco.3-NOTAAY FL Notsty Service 8. Bonding, Inc. EXHIBIT IIAII Type the legal description of the petition site here That part: of the following described parcel which lies in the South 1Iz of the North 1Iz of , Section 10, Township 36 South, Range 38 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT the North 5 feet of such part of parcel: Beginning at a point twenty-five (25) feet west of the quarter comer between Section 10 and 15, T. 36 S. R. 38 E., thence - north, parallel with quarter section line, to intersection with State Road Right of Way, thence - East, Fifty (50) feet, thence - South, parallel with quarter section line to the South line of said Section 10, thence - West, Fifty (50) feet to point of beginning, containing Six acres, more or less (as conveyed by North St. Lucie River Drainage District by Right of Way Deed dated February 16, 1931, recorded in Deed Book 83, page 384, public records of St. Lucie County, Florida). ,EXHIBIT UBI1 Draw an accurate sketch of the petition site and abu~ting properties; if applicable, or attach a Boundary Survey (preferred) '. , " -~...--- - -?-... "- + ~ i! ..f I I I I I I I I I I EVANS PRþPERTIE5 (J202:l2}(}OfJI-OCfJ18I I I I , . I I I 1 I I I 1 I >, DAN PINE I . = ,I OI!2:lJOOl- "I OOO/Q 17.23 ,. I, I _ (IŒOO/Hml8I 000/61 ''''5 ~ ~.17 ... .::J - . li'J/ I PATRICK J. & NENA H. LEARY (1!fIo«1(IHJIIf t2.0 M . '. , ... rtfHJIIH«(VJJ 10'.54 Aa 1] ,I , , (IJfQOOHIOO/. ,,..al hi PEnnON 51 .s.~"!....J:!Q..l1-_ (::¡ . ( I ~ I .) '<J I I I .1 I HA1I.I E CAar.TON 1 I 1Wrl.. I I eJ0J IOYItITON IItOMI VACATtD Oft J&J-1II'2t IQ .~10. ~ !J1O 1615 ~ , --,.. ------ ~ .. .. ~ v ~, 12"" M 403..... L. =- (f1+QOO2:llOO/11 11.77 M ...t? Ai: ., ~.. " "'t:. IHI-COOI-OCO/5I LN«) . JJJ.2I ... ~"..... ' 1.02 ... ' TOT ÞL .. .1.1G.J\'" @ ¡ t;¡ ~' i:j .. C.J 11' EXHIBIT ','C" Sketch or attach a !oc~tion map here --- -~~---- -~ - ~ \ tn.. ¡.,. lA, PATRICK J. & NENA H. LEARY '11 ., 910 1615 I2II-aII+«/(VJI 10'.5" /w ____.Jì.~.4J.....t:!Q.¡,.11__ _. (::') , ( (~J " ---+- .... ¿ 301."" I I I I I I I I I I EVANS PRþPERTIE5 13ZOP:i2fOllOHJCO/1I I I I I I I I I I I I I DAN PINE ~: ,I I1l2:COJf- rt2KIOIr (N2{(JJ1«1O/ 61 .. I CJXJ/SJ 000161 11.86 ~ 11.23 M 1.11 Art. I 0 I . (1I/HItIC#œØ/J 12.0 Àf! . II_<fI ".al hi PETITION 51 HARJK I I .1 I $TON I 4·.. I I I I e¡G ..... 4 \ JOYftIJOff M.IG YACAJQ Oft )I,J-W2I REI .... 1~5I ~'M ---- r: ~ ~, 121.1.,. -... I#:HJOOI-ØO/OI U9ÃA '-. " .......-.. '., IHI-OOOfOOCV5I LNtO . JJJ.2t '" ,WNIP . 1,02 M TOTÞL. .. JJCI,J1 M , . /:! <:; '" .., L_ t:; !!' "' w w "' c) .. '10 11' '15 '104 EXHIBIT liD" Type or print name/address, property identification number, and legal description of surrounding affected properties here I Owner Name and Address I Patrick J. Leary and Nena M. Leary, as Trustees of tbe Leary Living Trust 6317 Beachway Dr. Falls Church, VA 22044-1510 . Dan Pine 1009 W. 1st Street Fort Pierce, FL 34982-7242 Vi~ginia Lietner 1218 W. Main Street West Plains, MO 65775-2430 Mary E. C,arlton 5825 Ideal Holding Road ~ Fort Pierce, FL 34987~3204 North St. Lucie River Water Control District 2721 S. Jenkins Rd. Fort Pierce, FL 34981-5352 , Tax I. D. Number and Property Legal Description 3210-211-0014-000/3: Part of the NW~of Section 10, Township 36 South, Range 38 East, lying South of S.R. 70 (Okeechobee Road). As per Quit Cliam Deed recorded in OR Book 1336, page 1781. 3210-211-0001-000/9: That part of the East 15 acres of the NE~ of the NW~ of Section 10, Township 36 South, Range 38 East, lying Squth of S.R. 70, less Okeechobee Road widening as in OR Book 314, page 1993 and less E 25 feet of NW~ as inD.B. 83, page 384, and less canal 875 R/W. As Per Warranty Deed in OR BK 879-2456 3210-122-0001-000/6: W 1/2 of NW 1/4 of NE 1/4, less W 25 feet as in DB 83-384 and less Okeechobee Road widening as in OR Book 314, page 1993. As per Warranty Deed recorded in OR Book 408, page 1345. 3210-141-0001-000/5: The SE~ of the NE~and the S! .. of Section 10, Township 36 South, Range 38 East, less Road and Canal R/w. As in Deed Book 154, page 332, and Deed Book 162, page 377. 3210-133-0026-000/1: S 47 feet of N 1/2 and N 47 feet of Sl/2 of Section 10, Township 36 South, Range' 38 East. IOTE: ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NECESSARY. I Owner Name and Address I New Life Christian Centre of the Treasure Coast7 Inc. 5555 NW St. James Drive Port St. Lucie7 FL 34983 North St. Lucie River Water Constrol District 2121 S. Jenkins Rd. Fort Pierce7 FL 34981-5352 . EXHIBIT II E" (list of abutting property owners) Tax T. D. Number and Property Legal Description 3210~131-0001-000/4: Part of the E~ of the NWt7 and part of the W~ of the NEt of Section 107 Township 36 South7 Range 38 East. Warranty Deeds recorded in OR Book 22117 pages 1903 and 1905. 3210-133-0026-000/1: S 41 feet of N 1/2 and N 41 feet of S 1/2 of Section 107 Townshp 36 South7 Range 38 East. Exhibit "E" AFFIDA VIT OF CONSENT FROM ABUTTING PROPERTY OWNER COUNTY OF S1. LUCIE STATE OF FLORIDA BEFORE :ME, this day personally appeared Steven D. Cassens, who being duly sworn, deposes and says: 1. I am the President of the North S1. Lucie River Water Control District ("District") which is the owner of Can a} No. 76. Canal Nü, 76 lies immediately South of, and abuts, the Southerly terminus of the unopened County Road known as Boyington Road ("Petition Site"), 2. The District has been furnished a drawing which clearly indicates the unopened road right-of-way sought to be abandoned and its relationship to the District's right-of-way, The drawing is depicted on Exhibit "B" as is found in the Petition. 3, The District hereby consents to the abandonment of the Petition Site set forth in Exhibit "B" to the Petition, which site is adjacent to District right-of-way at its South terminus, \VHEREFORE, being duly sworn, the undersigned states that the foregoing information is true and correct to the best of my knowledge and belief. ~ Sworn to before me this :;;~ day of , ~O~ Q" otary Public, State of Florida My Commission Expires: //-OG-OC¡ Personally known ~ or Provided as Identification North S1. Lucie River Water Control District BY:~~ Steven D. Cassens d ~~\ ~\, , , President Date: (j''''~ A. · Æ..' NaIIry PubIc - SIIIII d FIDrIdI , . .,.., eœw.-.., &pn. New 'I." CMII~. 00 491511 ØandId Br NIIIonII NaIIIy,AM EXHIBIT !IF 1 II (Consent letter from affected utility company) CONSENT OF INTERESTED OR AFFECTED UTIUTY/DRAINAGE ENTITY DATE January 19, 2006 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY UTILITY COMPANY' Walton Service Center' 1050 S.E. Brandon Circle ADD'RESS Port St. Lucie, FL 34952 ::ITY; STATE ZIP <E: Petition to Abandon/Vacate (Description of Petition Site enclosed) ro Whom It May Concern: >Iease consider this letter as our request for a LETTER OF NO OBJECTION to the abandonment of the above referenced :ìte. :nclosed for your review is a copy of the sketch and description of the site proposed to be abandoned. A self-addressed ,nvelope is also enclosed for your reply. f you have any questions or if I may be of further assistance, please contact meat 772-461-5020 -hank you for your assistance in this matter. '::;incerely, NEIl LI~STL\N ~ By: ~~~ (Petitioner or agent) ø:tz?r-'\J OF THE TREASURE COAST, INC. ')c. Petition site sketch and description. ~*~~**~***************************~***************~******************************************************* Jnsent as requested V-- '- ' Insent with the following conditions: nsent Refused te~ FLORIDA POWER & L\G~COMPANY By: ~^",L-l Gt\tí l'ÀA-t-jAJ - rlZ~)ELT k~ Authorized Representative EXHIBIT "G" Proof of ownership óf petition site or adjacent benefiting property Warranty Deed recorded in OR Book 2217, page 1903 and Warranty Deed recorded in OR Book 2217, page 1905. Quit Claim Deed of reversionary interest recorded in OR Book 1826, page 2501. SEE ATTACHED COPIES OF THE ABOVE DEEDS. ' ~UW1N M. nu, Jr., CLl!;l<K UJf 'l'HJ!: CIRCUIT COUR'l' - SAINT LUCIE COUNTY FILE # 2604498 OR BOOK 2217 PAGE 1903, Recorded 04/18/2005 at 02:35 PM Doc Tax: $4200.00 ~t,,; 'Fr0AJ,.. \-\. r u. , TIL j é. s\- THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY and RETURN TO: ROBERT M. LLOYD, ATTORNEY AT LAW 604 BOSTON AVENUE FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34950 Courthouse Bo><: 134 PARCEL ID NO, 3210-131-0001-000/4 WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE, executed this I ~ay of April, 2005, between BUCK HAMMOCK GROVES, INC., a Florida corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", and NEW LIFE CHRISTIAN CENTRE OF THE TREASURE COAST, INC., a Florida not for profit corporation, whose mailing address is 5555 St. James Dr., Port St. Lucie, FL 34983, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee". WITNES SETH Grantor, in consideration of the sum of $10.00 and other valuable consideration in hand paid by Grantee, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, and convey to Grantee, its successors and assigns forever all of Grantor's undivided !is interest in the following described land situate in St. Lucie County, Florida, to-wit: ' As more particularly described in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and by this reference made a part hereof. OOD J. JOHNS N, Its President King's Highway, Fort Pierce, FL 34945 ;;fj;~~;:~;, . (CORPORATE S:E,N-")'~~"~:':~1I:;""-":" '"':- ::::LS:::cm . ~ ~1~~;~, The foregoing instrument was ac owledged before me this....i-. day of April, 2005, by SHERWOOD J. JOHNSON, President of BUCK HAMMOCK GROVES, INC., on behalf of the corporation, SHERWOOD 1. JOHNSON has presented his Florida driver's license as identification. VVLa. ~"" 2.~ß ~MILLS Notary Public· State of Florida My Commission Expires: July 05, 2006 Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said I lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. together with all appurtenances and hereditaments belonging or 0 e ise pertaining thereto, including without limitation any easement, privilege, license or right of wa' 'g to the benefit of said land. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused this Deed to be execut corporate seal to be hereunto affixed, by its proper offi to duly auili first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: ~~~ Rooert M. Lloyd - Witness ~. Î\ M..... e Mila \.¥ ; "... CDmIIIiIoIcn 00131715 ........' Ex,.,.. Jolt 05, 200e oJ U~ ~UUK ¿¿~I ~~~ ~~U4 , LEGAL DESCRIPTION TIlE EAST 3/4 OF TIlE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 AND THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 36 sourn, RANGE 38 EAST, L TING NORTII OF THE NORTII ST. LUCIE RIVER DRAINAGE DISTRICI' CANAL NO. 76, LESS BOYNTON ROAD, AND FURTHER LESS THE FOLLOW1NG DESCRIBED PROPERTY: BEGINNING AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE WEST LINE OF SAID EAST 3/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 WITH THE NORTH RIGHr OF WAY LINE OF SAID CANAL NO. 76; THENCE RUN NORTH 00°08'56" WEST, ALONG TIlE SAID WEST LINE OF THE SAID EAST 3/4, A DISTANCE OF 1281.68 FEET, TO THE NORTII LINE OF THE SAID SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°56'09" EAST, ALONG THE SAID NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 213.03 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°21 '48" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 646.31 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89°49'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 711.64 FEET; TIlENCE RUN SOUTH 00°12'05" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 636.62 FEET, TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH TIIE SAID NORm RlGHr OF WAY LINE OF CANAL NO. 76; THENCE RUN sourn 89°57'35" WEST, ALONG SAID RIGHr OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 928.03 FEET TO TIIE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETHER WITH: THE EAST ~ OF THE WEST ~ OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF mE NORTHWEST 1/4 AND THE WEST ~ OF THE WEST ~ OF THE EAST 1 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 (SOUTH OF STATE RO 70 LESS CANAL RIGHT OF WAY AND LESS OKEECHOBEE ROAD WID S IN OR BOOK 314, PAGE 1993 AND LESS AS IN O.R. BOOK 488, PAGE 100 SECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, SAINT UCIE UNTY, FLORIDA. (a) reservations, restrictions, e record, if any, but this referen TIIE EAST 25 FEET QF THE SE 1/4 OF THE SW 1/4 OF mE NE 1/4, LESS AND NSLRWCD CANAL NO. 76, SECTION 1 , EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORID NOTE: ALL RECORDING REFERENCES ARE LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Together with the 2005-2006 Citrus AND THE T 25 FEET OF Hr-OF-WAYFOR 36 sourn, RANGE 38 TOGETIIER WITH: LIC RECORDS OF ST. e land and all future citrus crops. Subject to: <litions, agreements and rights of way of I not operate to reimpose the same. . ctions imposed by governmental authorities. (c) Taxes and assessments a subsequent to December 31, 2004. EXHIBIT "A" ~UW.Ll'I M. un, Jr., L:LJ:;!<K UI!" THJ:; CIRCUIT COURT - SAINT LUCIE COUNTY FILE # 2604499 OR BOOK 2217 PAGE 1905, Recorded 04/18/2005 at 02:35 PM Doc Tax: $4200.00 ~1- -. ·~to: 'f1-~ ~. ç::~Q.} 11Lß·s D' THIS INSTRUMENT PREPARED BY and RETURN TO: ROBERT M. LLOYD, ATTORNEY AT LAW 604 BOSTON A VENUE FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34950 Courthouse Box: ) 34 PARCEL ill NO. 3210-131-0001-000/4 WARRANTY DEED THIS INDENTURE, executed this~y of April, 2005, between JOHNSON & JOHNSON CITRUS, lNC., a Florida corporation, hereinafter referred to as "Grantor", and NEW LIFE CHRISTIAN CENTRE OF THE 'IREASURE COAST, lNC., a Florida not for profit corporation, whose mailing address is 5555 St. James Dr., Port St. Lucie, FL 34983, hereinafter referred to as "Grantee". WITNESSETH Grantor, in consideration of the sum of $1 0.00 and other valuable consideration in hand paid by Grantee, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, does hereby grant, bargain, sell, and convey to Grantee, its successors and assigns forever all of Grantor's undivided ~ interest in the following described land situate in St. Lucie County, Florida, to-wit: As more particularly described in Exhibit "A", which is attached hereto and by this reference made apart hereof. together with all appurtenances and hereditaments belonging or 0 without limitation any easement, privilege, license or right of way STATE OF FLORIDA Grantor does hereby fully warrant the title to said Ian lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Grantor has caused this Deed to be cxecut . its name, and its corporate seal to be hereunto affixed, by its proper offic to duly autho . ed on the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: ~4'~ Róbert M. Lloyd - itness (CORPORATE SEAL) COUN1Y OF ST. LUÇIE The foregoing instrument was ac owledged before me this 1* day of April, 2005, by ROBERT J. JOHNSON, President of JOHNSON & JOHNSON CITRUS, lNC., on behalf of the corporation. ROBERT J. JOHNSON has presented his Florida driver's license as identification. ~I\' f. ~ ME SSA E. MILLS Notary Public - State of Florida My Commission Expires: July 05, 2006 ""a\. -.. E MIlIa !~ . My CcmniuIon 0013111$ '\"'..J EXIirn July 0$, 2008 OR BOOK 2217 PAGE 1906 LEGAL DESCRIPTION THE EAST 3/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 AND THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4 OF SECTION 10, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, LYING NORTH OF THE NORTH ST. LUCIE RIVER DRAINAGE DISTRICT CANAL NO. 76, LESS BOYNTON ROAD, AND FURTHER LESS THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY: BEGINNJNG AT THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WlTII THE WEST L1NE OF SAID EAST 3/4 OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4 WlTII THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF SAID CANAL NO. 76; THENCE RUN NORTH 00"08'56" WEST. ALONG THE SAID WEST LINE OF THE SAID EAST 3/4, A DISTANCE OF 1281.68 FEET, TO THE NORTH LINE OF THE SAID SE 1/4 OF THE NW 1/4; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89"56'09" EAST, ALONG THE SAID NORTH L1NE A DISTANCE OF 213.03 FEET; THENCE RUN sourn 00"21 '48" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 646.31 FEET; THENCE RUN NORTH 89"49'44" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 711.64 FEET; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00°12'05" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 636.62 FEET, TO THE POINT OF INTERSECTION WITH THE SAID NORTH RJGfIT OF WAY LINE OF CANAL NO. 76; THENCE RUN SOUTH 89°57'35" WEST, ALONG SAID RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 928.03 FEET TO THE SAID POINT OF BEGINNING. TOGETIiER WITH: THE EAST ~ OF THE WEST ~ OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 AND THE WEST ~ OF THE WEST ~ OF THE EAST Y, F THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 (SOUTH OF STATE RO 0 LESS CANAL RIGHT OF WAY AND LESS OKEECHOBEE ROAD WIDENIN O.R. BOOK 314, PAGE 1993 AND LESS AS IN O.R. BOOK 488, PAGE 100) ECTION 10 TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 38 EAST, SAINT L IE CO , FLORIDA. TOGETHER WlTII: (b) all applicable zoning ordin THE EAST 25 FEET OF THE SE 1/4 OF THE THE SW 1/4 OF THE NE 1/4, LESS AND EX NSLRWCDCANALNO. 76, SECTION 10, EAST, ST. LUcæ COUNTY, FLORIDA. THE WE 25 FEET OF -OF-WAY FOR SOUTH, RANGE 38 C RECORDS OF ST. d and all future citrus crops. (a) reservations, restrictions, ease record, if any, but this reference . ns imposed by govenunental authorities. sequent to December 31, 2004. EXHIBIT "A" .' This Instrument Prepared by: Frank H. Fee, III, Esquire Fee, Koblegard & De Ross 401 South Indian River Dr. Fort Pierce, Florida 34950 JOANNE HOLMAN, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT - SAINT LUCIE COUNTY File Number: 2293366 OR BOOK 1826 PAGE 2501 Recorded:lù/22/03 14:08 * Doc AssufI1P: :t 0 .00 * Doc Tàx $ 0.70 * Int TàX $ 0.00 Return to: QUIT-CLAIM DEED THIS QUIT-CLAIM DEED, executed this 31 st day of July, 2003, by NORTH ST. LUCIE RIVER WATER CONTROL DISTRICT, a quasi-public corporation existing under the laws of the State of Florida 2721 S. Jenkins Road Fort Pierce, Florida 34981 first party, to JOHNSON & JOHNSON CITRUS, INC. and BUCK HAMMOCK GROVES, INC., each a Florida corporation and each as to an undivided 1/2 interest 2650 S Kings Highway Fort Pierce, FL 34945-2646 second party: (Wherever used herein, the terms "first party' and 'second party' shall include singular and plural, heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, wherever the context so admits or requires. . WITNESSETH, That the said first party, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 in hand paid by the said second party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quit-claim unto the said second party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of S1. Lucie, State of Florida, to-wit: The East 25 feet of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 and the West 25 feet of the SW 1/4 of the NE 1/4, less and except right-of-way for NSLRWCD Canal No. 76, Section 10, Township 36 South, Range 38 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and ail the estate, right, title, imerest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party, either in law or equity to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said first party has caused these presents to be executed the day and year first above written. NORTH ST. LUCIE RIVER WATER CONTROL DISTRICT BY:~~ STEVEN D. CASSENS, President Board of Supervisors L OR BOOK 1826 PAGE 2502 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE I HEREBY CERTIFY that the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 31st day of July, 2003 by STEVEN D. CASSENS, as President of the Board of Supervisors, ofthe NORTH ST. LUCIE RIVER WATER CONTROL DISTRICT, who is personally known to me or who provided ~k~d who did not take an oath. COM1.'e. "I.\.e (YlQjft , NOTARY PUBLIC My Commission Expires: My Commission No.: '.r;;ii.¡).... Connie Sue Moore ff : MY COMMISSION,' CC995254 EXPIRES ¡a'.. April 4, 2005 "'1,i... BONO£O 1HRU noy FAIN INSURANC~ INe. 'liil"'~ EXHIBIT "H" Certi.fication of taxes paid on petition site or adjacent benefiting property Tax Collector 81. Lucie County Florida Page 1 of 1 ft. l.oi.ii:'11 COIMI"t T.u. c:cn.LICfOI Bob Davis, CPA, CGFO, CFC DUPLICATE 2005 REAL ESTATE I.O. NUMBER ~J;.ò~~~_~',-,-,-¡¡;l' i~T~.~ðJf~w;~5f!~~S:~! New Life Christian Centre Of 5555 NW St James Dr Port St Lucie,FL 34983-0000 10 36S38E 10 36 38 SW 1/4 OF NE 1/4-LESS W 25 FT AND LESS S 47 FT- AND E 3/4 OF SE 1/4 OF NW 1/4-LESS E 25 FT AND LESS S 47 FT AND E 1/2 OF W 1/2 OF NE 1/4'OF NW CONTINUED ON TAX ROLL t' . . .. ~ I: ~:':i':'...:,,~'i,<:';.:.·~,i·-~.i, ~_~.+;/:;Ji,::;':"·..~~:,~:.1:~jJ,';:' ~:~~,P.;;.fi?J~1Ut...·~:~D1.~AI!DA 'MiiY'A~eS~;i:;,,~~~;:.~,~~.::..~YfA~.'1~;Z·;~¿~:~.::!;¡~..~'"~;';'~~~¡$,~~'kt. County Parks MSTU Co Public Transit MSTU Erosion District E Environ Signif Land Bond Law Enf,Jail,Judicial Sys Co General Revenue Fund St Lucie County Port Bond St Lucie Co Storm Wtr Mgt St Lucie Co Corom Dev MSTU Law Enforcement MSTU Childrens Service Council St Lucie Co Fire District FL Inland Navigation Dist School Non-voted Cap Imp School Req Loc Ef/Discret S FL Water Mgmt District .2500 .0900 .1000 .1154 2.9807 4.2619 .0216 .4108 .5256 .3544 .3915 2.7562 .0385 2.0000 5.9220 .6970 11.37 4.09 4.55 5.25 135.59 193.87 0.98 18.69 23.91 16.12 17.81 125.37 1. 75 90.98 269.38 31.71 ''''~'It~'''''';<r''''I:{îrt£Wä_AmRII¡1 $95 2 .. ~~'¡¡;"'-.', ,...~!i."'I'&"''''''''''''' '.. .., .,. . .:. " . .'. .~.... ..... . .. .. 1. 4 f;~j~¡f""'~"';>!I";~~"""~")~""~N'Q. ~'""'''''''''''I!_n_~~-___~..e~~~ø:¡ìi ,"."""~"'''''''''',,,,,".,.'i''''~'' ,.., ""~~ . . ",^_u''''_ ...ftc""'_......mc.'. ,... . ,,.., . ~, 4~[ .,IH:{. ·U.' N St Lucie Wtr Mgmt Dist Water Mgmt .125@Asd;$25Min 710.75 .~_.. ~,-,.,,,~~~.,..-:.-.,-". - '~'- '-~':'-: AI.;L TAXes aeCOM£ OeUNQUENT APRIL 1ST. $710.75 ~~J~~~~~"'~~$~ fjí1E1~~;:;~ro~~~~~f1~~~:-:~ ':";~£;~~ ~~t ~:-; :~~,; ~ ~~ ":=.,:'~~ J '-~""i7 ,:~::;I~':i:~ ~~..~~17..,!Jt~~¡'~'F'<j0'~I~'\;J.;~;~::~J."-r~~~ ~~~ f'fj~~~~ ;~--t t..;··"':ilt¡JI,1~_1.'0~1~~~m~".:~¡ -;.:.. ~I f-;; :__ k, """r'J:~~:J:~~.·~i::-\.~,:"~.~%¡1 r~i~~~~~t,~~~~' ··$';.';~;l~~ ~.~;;' \ 'i~1 .!~~' > ~~c~~~}'J"~~ u+ ~~: ~ ~t:::~:~~~L:l,~ ,~~. ':..~~;!; .. j\ , ~:,:,'ì ~~~ ~ 1, '\:'I?f .~ _~I~t":'if~',~: ~:;.~1';;~¡ ~1<j~~-¡,;.'tf 1:t"oJ~J1~~(1l~·-1i~¡; :::..1 ;~~7J~,~·_1tc='l-:t.1¡~~f 'í':'~!--'-"'7Ð1::i'-"i'J<r' ~;':"-.." :t!:.' ,f¡,'~;-¡i¡·,..~' ~ ..,;,".. ...: ..... ::-'I~-'-:' ~ "', .r~~~ .;-, 'j~ :$.~...,ç I _.Li!"..2!~-LW_;.'I:;{.~~_~\i,1i :i:l."òt..~. ~ """"-'-"-t;~~'l';:',. -1-.___"'- ~....~__ li..~_ LJ . ,_. _--'__ 1 __ . ",-. ~~ - ''"-- U~ __...." ..",,4_~ - '-..,- *** PAID *** PAID *** PAID *** 02/06/06 PERIOD 4 09-20060206-004685 ( $1,&45.55 CK The information contained herein does not constitute a title search and should not be used as such. This Internet service is subject to verification by the St Lucie County Tax Collector. EXHIBIT "I II Resolution of Abandonment by Municipality (Only if petition site is within a municipality) NOT APPLICABLE EXHIBIT IIJ" Petitioner's statement in support of granting petition Petitioner, NewLife Christian Centre of the Treasure Coast ("Church"), purchased the parent tract of 56 acres, more or less ("Property"), affected by the unopened road Petition Site in the Spring of2005. The purchase was for Church investment in furtherance of aims and objectives of the Church. The Petition Site road severs the acreage, and its abandonment is necessary in order to plan for the ultimate use, disposition or development of the Property. The Church may consider development as a rural Planned Unit Development with appropriate amenities at ,a future time. Future use or disposition of the Property will be determined based upon the developing investment needs and objectives of the Church. Abandonment of the Petition Site unopened road is needed in order for the Property to achieve its highest and best condition for future use. The Petition Site unopened road was contributed by Right of Way Deed given St. Lucie County by the North St. LUcie River Drainage District ("District") in 1931. The contributed property amounted to un-excavated, surplus drainage right-of-way. The Right of Way Deed provided for reversion of title to the District if the road was discontinued as such. The Petition Site road apparently was never improved or opened as a public road or highway. The District consents to this Petition. The portion of the road.South of the Petition Site was abandoned by St. Lucie County ordinance in 1981, and quit-claimed by the District to the adjacent property owner. EXHIBIT "K" (Proof of Publication of Notice of Intent to File a Petition for Abandonment) SEE ATTACHED ~A~ III SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS Fort Pierce Tribune 600 Edwards Road, Fort Pierce, FL 34982 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION NOTICE OF INTENT TO PETITION FOR ABANDONMENT ..' . , -'-"""""-'-:,:-':.::''''.J',,' TO WHOM ITMAY'CON> . CERN:. '. ...... You will takeH()tic~tHät in' acc'ordänce'wittl'ihe,,' provisions .ofSectiÒrt'.i" ..... 177)01', as amen~éqi,1\;:!' 3~6:09 and 336.1QYFlo(ii",j . SCRIPPS HOWARD STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST, LUCIE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, S. Darlene Mailing, who on oath says that she is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Fort Pierce Tribune, a daily newspaper published at Fort Pierce in St. Lucie County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was publshed in the Fort Pierce Tribune in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Fort Pierce Tribune is a newspaper published in Fort Pierce. in said SI. Lucie County, Florida. and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said St. Lucie.County, Florida. daily and distributed in St. Lucie County. Florida, for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or corporation any discount. rebate. commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Fort Pierce Tribune has been entered as Periodical Matter at the Post Offices in Fort Pierce. St. Lucie County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Ad Pub Customer Number Date Copvline PO# FEE, DEROSS & FEE 1327421 2/11/2006 NOTICE OF INTENT TO 177.101 PETITION FEE, DEROSS & FEE 2/18/2006 Subscribed and sworn to me before this date: February 20, 2006 .j; '1:taJc.Ju :JJeJ.I. -"(f -J (~~ Notary \~iC . - - - - '''''''' MÅRY.fì¡.LBYRNE ::'m'~~'" "'\. No1ary Public - State of RoricIa ~. .~ My Coo1missionEJpie&Aug2.2Oœ ~ 7Æ§ Commmiuion t 00132804 Þ '~~.....~ Bonded By NationaJ Notary Ala.'. Þ .. ..Iliftr..,,,, ....,... , AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO.~ DA TE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 06-016 - Establishing the Waterstone Community Development District. BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: Permission to advertise Ordinance No. 06-016 for public hearing was granted by the Board of County Commissioners on April 11, 2006. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Ordinance No. 06-016 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Ordinance. COMMISSION ACTION: E: )(] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 Douglas nderson County Administrator County Attorney: 1: I< ," /, Å./ <.;..J Review and AÐÐrovals Management & Budget Purchasing Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicablel___ Eff. 5/96 ~ INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO: 06-796 DATE: May 5, 2006 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 06-016 - Establishing the Waterstone Community Development District BACKGROUND: Attached to this memorandum is a copy of draft Ordinance No. 06-016 which, if adopted, would establish the Waterstone Communi ty Development District, a residential development located on property bounded on the west by Emerson Avenue, just north of Indrio Road, west of Kings Highway and just south of the North boundary of the St. Lucie County line. permission to advertise Ordinance No. 06-016 for public hearing was granted by the Board of County Commissioners on April 11, 2006. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Ordinance No. 06-016 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Ordinance. DSM/cac Attachment ., ORDINANCE NO. 06-016 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1-6.5 "COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ESTABLISHING THE W A TERSTONE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; ESTABLISHING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT; DESIGNATING THE INITIAL MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING POWERS; PROVIDING SPECIAL CONDITIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; AND SETTING FORTH THE VOTE ON ADOPTION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. The Board is authorized, pursuant to Sections 125.01 and 190.005, Florida Statutes, to establish community development districts that are less than 1,000 acres in size and located within the unincorporated areas of the County. 2. Port Richey Village Investments, LLC, has filed with the Board a petition for the establishment of a community development district, which petition contains the information required by Section 190.005(1)(a), Florida Statutes. 3. In accordance with Section 190.005(1)(d) and 2(b), Florida Statutes, the Board held a public hearing on , 2006, after publishing notice of such hearing in the Tribune on , 2006, , 2006, , 2006 and , 2006 and: (a) The Board has considered the record of the public hearing and the factors set forth in Section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes, and has found that: (b) All statements contained within the petition are true and correct; (c) The creation of this district is consistent with all applicable elements and portions of the state comprehensive plan and the effective local government comprehensive plan; Stpl:lell tAP81:1gA portions are deleted. Underlined portions are added. -1- (d) The area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community; (e) The district is the best alternative available for delivering the community development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district; (t) The community development services and facilities for the district will be compatible with the capacity and uses of the existing local and regional community development services and facilities; and, (g) The area that will be served by the district is amenable to separate special district government. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. ARTICLE XII OF CHAPTER 1-6.5 "COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED TO READ: ARTICLE XIV "W ATERSTONE" COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT": Section 1-6.5-159. Established: name The W aterstone Community Development District is hereby established. Section 1-6.5-160. Boundaries The boundaries of the Waterstone Community Development District are as set forth in the legal description below. Waterstone CDD - Legal Description See Exhibit" A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. Section 1-6.5-161 Initial Board of Supervisors The following five persons are designated as the initial members of the Board of Supervisors of the Waterstone Community Development District: John C. Bower, Craig Edwards, Scott Nickle. Jon Mott and Randall A. Cave. Section 1-6.5-162. Powers Strlleh tllr811!1I portions are deleted. Underlined portions are added. -2- The Waterstone Community Development District shall have all those general powers granted pursuant to Section 190.01 L and those special powers granted pursuant to Section 190.012 (1) and (3). Consent is hereby given to the District to exercise those powers relating to Recreation and Security contained in Section 190.012 (2)(a) and (d), subiect to the following limitations. 1. The Waterstone Community Development District shall not provide water or I wastewater service to the lands located within or outside the boundaries of the District. 2. The Waterstone Community Development District shall not be authorized to construct fire stations or provide for fire trucks or other vehicles and equipment related thereto. Section 1-6.5-163 Special Conditions 1. The Waterstone Community Development District will use its best efforts to develop in an integrated fashion the traffic circulation. water. and sewer facilities on the district property as one functional interrelated community. 2. The Waterstone Community Development District shall take no action which is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. ordinances or regulations of St. Lucie County. ¿ No publicly owned property that may be located or acquired within the legal description of this Community Development District shall be assessed for. or obligated in any way to pay for the infrastructure constructed. maintained. or operated by the Community Development District described in section 1.6-5.151 above. 4. The Waterstone Community Development District shall take affirmative steps to provide for the full disclosure of information relating to the public financing and maintenance of improvements to real property undertaken by the district. Such information shall be made available to all existing residents. and to all prospective residents. of the district. The district shall furnish each developer of a residential development within the district with sufficient copies of that information to provide each prospective initial purchaser of property in that development with a COPy. and any developer of a residential development within the district. when required by law to provide a public offering statement. shall include a COPy of such information relating to the public financing and maintenance of improvements in the public offering statement. .i. Following the establishment of the Waterstone Community Development District. as provided for in Sections 1-6.5-159 and 1-6.5-160 above. each contract for the initial sale of a parcel of real property and each contract for the initial sale of a residential unit within the District shall include. immediately prior to the space reserved in the contract for the signature of the purchaser. the following disclosure statement in boldfaced and conspicuous type which is larger Stpl:lel( tkp81:1gk portions are deleted. Underlined portions are added. -3- than the type in the remaining text of the contract: "THE (Name of District) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAY IMPOSE AND LEVY TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS, OR BOTH TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS, ON THIS PROPERTY, THESE TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS PAY THE CONSTRUCTION, OPERATION, AND MAINTENANCE COSTS OF CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES OF THE DISTRICT AND ARE SET ANNUALLY BY THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE DISTRICT. THESE TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS ARE IN ADDITION TO COUNTY AND OTHER LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS AND ALL OTHER TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS PROVIDED FOR BY LAW." PARTB. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable throughout St. Lucie County's jurisdiction. PARTE. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk be and is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART F. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. PART G. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: StF'l:Iel( tAF'el:lgA portions are deleted. Underlined portions are added. -4- Chairman Douglas Coward Vice Chairman Chris Craft Commissioner Joseph E. Smith Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX PART H. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through H shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this _ day of ,2006. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS County Attorney Strl:lel< tl'lrel:lgl'l portions are deleted. Underlined portions are added. -5- EXHIBIT "A" The North 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of Section 14, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT the South 50 acres thereof, and LESS AND EXCEPT the East 80 feet and the West 95 feet thereof for road and canal rights of way. TOGETHER WITH: The SW 1/4 of Section 11, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT the East 80 feet and the West 95 feet thereof for road and canal rights of way. TOGETHER WITH: The South 50 acres of the North 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of Section 14, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, LESS AND EXCEPT the East 80 feet and the West 95 feet thereof for road and canal rights of way. TOGETHER WITH: The N 1/2 of the N 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 and the N 1/2 of the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4 and the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 14, Township 34 South, Range 39 East; said land lying and being in St. Lucie County, Florida. LESS AND EXCEPTING therefrom the following described property: The East 1780 feet of that portion ofthe N 1/2 of the N 1/2 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4; and the N 1/2 of the N 1/2 of the SE 1/4 of the NW 1/4; and the S 1/2 of the NW 1/4 of the SW 1/4 of the NW 1/4 of Section 14, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, lying west of the Fort pierce Farms Water Management District Canal Number 5, the said East 1780 feet being measured along the north and south lines of the above described parcel. Said lands lying and being in St. Lucie County, Florida, and containing 240.067 acres, more or less. StF'ljeh tAF'81jgA portions are deleted. Underlined portions are added. -6- ~, ~.. / , AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 5L-- DA TE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 06-014 - Establishing the Celebration Pointe Community Development District. BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. FUNDS AVAll...: PREVIOUS ACTION: Permission to advertise Ordinance No. 06-014 for public hearing was granted by the Board of County Commissioners on April 4, 2006. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Ordinance No. 06-014 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Ordinance. Approved 4-0 Comm. Hutchinson abstained. COMMISSION ACTION: []I APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Douglas nderson County Administrator County Attorney: -:)'. ,.~ . "'- Review and ADDrovals Management & Budget Purchasing Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 ., INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners r~__ [,\/ FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney(~/Z::' C.A. NO: 06-795 DATE: May 5, 2006 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 06-014 - Establishing the Celebration Pointe Communi ty Development District BACKGROUND: Attached to this memorandum is a copy of draft Ordinance No. 06-014 which, if adopted, would establish the Celebration Pointe Community Development District, a residential development located on North Jenkins Road between Okeechobee Road and Orange Avenue. Permission to advertise Ordinance No. 06-014 for public hearing was granted by the Board of County Commissioners on April 4, 2006. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Ordinance No. 06-014 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Ordinance. DSM/cac Attachment ORDINANCE NO. 06-014 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1-6.5 "COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; ESTABLISHING THE CELEBRATION POINTE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT; ESTABLISHING THE BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT; DESIGNATING THE INITIAL MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE DISTRICT; PROVIDING POWERS; PROVIDING SPECIAL CONDITIONS; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION; AND SETTING FORTH THE VOTE ON ADOPTION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including, but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. The Board is authorized, pursuant to Sections 125.01 and 190.005, Florida Statutes, to establish community development districts that are less than 1,000 acres in size and located within the unincorporated areas of the County. 2. Mercedes Homes, has filed with the Board a petition for the establishment of a community development district, which petition contains the information required by Section 190.005(1 )(a), Florida Statutes. 3. In accordance with Section 190.005(1)(d) and 2(b), Florida Statutes, the Board held a public hearing on , 2006, after publishing notice of such hearing in the Tribune on , 2006, , 2006, , 2006 and , 2006 and: (a) The Board has considered the record of the public hearing and the factors set forth in Section 190.005(1)(e), Florida Statutes, and has found that: (b) All statements contained within the petition are true and correct; (c) The creation of this district is consistent with all applicable elements and portions of the state comprehensive plan and the effective local government comprehensive plan; Stf'l:Id< t¡'rel:lg¡' portions are deleted. Underlined portions are added. -1- G:\ATTY\ORDNANCE\2006\06-14 rev (d) The area of land within the proposed district is of sufficient size, is sufficiently compact, and is sufficiently contiguous to be developable as one functional interrelated community; (e) The district is the best alternative available for delivering the community development services and facilities to the area that will be served by the district; (f) The community development services and facilities for the district will be compatible with the capacity and uses of the existing local and regional community development services and facilities; and, (g) The area that will be served by the district is amenable to separate special district government. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. ARTICLE XII OF CHAPTER 1-6.5 "COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT" OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, AS AMENDED TO READ: ARTICLE XIV "CELEBRATION POINTE" COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT": Section 1-6.5-159. Established: name The Celebration Pointe Community Development District is hereby established. Section 1-6.5-160. Boundaries The boundaries of the Celebration Pointe Community Development District are as set forth in the legal description below. Celebration Pointe CDD - Legal Description See Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated herein. Section 1-6.5-161 Initial Board of Supervisors The following five persons are desÌlmated as the initial members of the Board of Supervisors of the Celebration Pointe Community Development District: Robert M. Kush. Ken Mitchell. James L. Sigmund. Rob Smithwick. and Kevin Gillen. Strtleh thretlgk portions are deleted. Underlined portions are added. -2- G:\ATTY\ORDNANCE\2006\06-14 rev Section 1-6.5-162. Powers The Celebration Pointe Community Development District shall have all those general powers granted pursuant to Section 190.011. and those special powers granted pursuant to Section 190.012 (1) and (3). Consent is hereby given to the District to exercise those powers relating to Recreation and Security contained in Section 190.012 (2)(a) and (d)' subiect to the following limitations. 1. The Celebration Pointe Community Development District shall not provide water or wastewater service to the lands located within or outside the boundaries of the District. 2,. The Celebration Pointe Community Development District shall not be authorized to construct fire stations or provide for fire trucks or other vehicles and equipment related thereto. Section 1-6.5-163 Special Conditions 1. The Celebration Pointe Community Development District will use its best efforts to develop in an integrated fashion the traffic circulation. water. and sewer facilities on the district property as one functional interrelated community. 2. The Celebration Pointe Community Development District shall take no action which is inconsistent with the comprehensive plan. ordinances or regulations of St. Lucie County . 1:. No publicly owned property that may be located or acquired within the legal description of this Community Development District shall be assessed for. or obligated in any way to pay for the infrastructure constructed. maintained. or operated by the Community Development District described in section 1.6-5.151 above. 4. The Celebration Pointe Community Development District shall take affirmative steps to provide for the full disclosure of information relating to the public financing and maintenance of improvements to real property undertaken by the district. Such information shall be made available to all existing residents. and to all prospective residents. of the district. The district shall furnish each developer of a residential development within the district with sufficient copies of that information to provide each prospective initial purchaser of property in that development with a copy. and any developer of a residential development within the district. when required by law to provide a public offering statement. shall include a copy of such information relating to the public financing and maintenance of improvements in the public offering statement. StPtleh thretlgh portions are deleted. Underlined portions are added. -3- G:\ATTY\ORDNANCE\2006\06-14 rev 2:. Following the establishment of the Celebration Pointe Community Development District. as provided for in Sections 1-6.5-159 and 1-6.5-160 above. each contract for the initial sale of a parcel of real property and each contract for the initial sale of a residential unit within the District shall include. immediately prior to the space reserved in the contract for the signature of the purchaser. the following disclosure statement in boldfaced and conspicuous type which is larger than the type in the remaining text of the contract: "THE (Name of District) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DISTRICT MAY IMPOSE AND LEVY TAXES OR ASSESSMENTS. OR BOTH TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS. ON THIS PROPERTY. THESE TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS PAY THE CONSTRUCTION. OPERATION. AND MAINTENANCE COSTS OF CERTAIN PUBLIC FACILITIES AND SERVICES OF THE DISTRICT AND ARE SET ANNUALLY BY THE GOVERNING BOARD OF THE DISTRICT. THESE TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS ARE IN ADDITION TO COUNTY AND OTHER LOCAL GOVERNMENTAL TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS AND ALL OTHER TAXES AND ASSESSMENTS PROVIDED FOR BY LAW." PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of S1. Lucie County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable throughout S1. Lucie County's jurisdiction. PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PARTF. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. Strtl~h thrðtlgh portions are deleted. Underlined portions are added. -4- G:\ATTY\ORDNANCE\2006\06-14 rev PART G. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Douglas Coward Vice Chairman Chris Craft Commissioner Joseph E. Smith Commissioner Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX PARTH. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through H shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this _ day of ,2006. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS County Attorney StF'tlel< tkF'8l1gk portions are deleted. Underlined portions are added. -5- G: \A TTY\ORDNANCE\2006 \06-14 rev 5trueh thretJg" portions are deleted. Underlined portions are added, G:\ATTY\ORDNANCE\2006\06-14 rev EXHIBIT" A" -6- 0~/12/Ó6 FZABWARR FUND 001 001156 001166 001172 001174 001175 001179 001181 001257 001289 001299 001310 001404 001410 001814 101 101002 101003 101004 101006 102 102001 104001 105 J01 107002 107003 107006 109 129 129310 130 130203 140 140001 140337 150 160 183 183001 183004 183006 184205 185004 185005 185006 185008 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD WARRANT LIST #32- 06-MAY-2006 TO 12-MAY-2006 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund FTA USC Seeton 5307 Oper. Assist. Section 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning 05 CDBG Grant FY 05 FHFC Disaster Relief Grant Urban MIL Grant FY06 CSBG FY 06 FTA Section 5307 Operating & Capita TDC Planning Grant F/Y 06 FDOT Trans Buses and Infrastructure FDCA Emergency Mgmt Prep & Assistan Dep Innovative Recyclin/Waste Redu 05 CSBG Sup Diaster Recovery Mobile Irrigation Lab F/Y 06 Floridian Aquifer Well Monitoring N Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option Transportation Trust/County Fuel Tx Transportation Trust/Impact Fees Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Recreation Donations Fund Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper F&F Fund-Court Related Technology Drug Abuse Fund Parks MSTU Fund FRDAP Grant-Lawnwood Recreation Com SLC Public Transit MSTU FDOT-Fixed Route Grant Port & Airport Fund Port Fund Install Perimeter Fencing #412400 Impact Fee Collections Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court Guardian Ad Litem Fund FDEP Fort Pierce Shore Protection P FHFA SHIP FY03/04 FHFA SHIP FY04/05 FHFA SHIP FY05/06 FHFA Hurricane Housing Recovery EXPENSES 575,182.88 10,229.89 35,626.49 38,227.78 34,538.50 0.00 5,691.28 2,250.44 253.40 1,652.56 5,033.16 7,500.00 8,511.22 0.00 13.66 2,721.76 304,243.47 32,074.93 25,148.45 139,644.44 38,968.81 164,189.26 458.31 1,011. 86 277 ,872 . 55 1,123.09 2,679.32 3,060.76 43,096.83 12,000.00 2,049,492.00 7,180.00 145,281.02 24,163.85 13,264.29 72 . 07 11,071.57 1,411.21 2,313.41 2,573.35 24.14 100.94 1,285.30 4,822.98 17,389.83 78,975.00 132,222.10 1,178.51 PAGE PAYROLL 4,579.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,184.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 8,184.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 603.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 05/..12/06 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 2 FZABWARR WARRANT LIST #32- 06-MAY-2006 TO 12-MAY-2006 FUND SUMMARY FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 310002 Impact Fees-Parks 69,032.99 0.00 310203 FBIP River Park Marina 15,696.00 0.00 315 County Building Fund 12,908.22 0.00 316 County Capital 128,417.72 0.00 316001 Transportation Capital 5,234.30 0.00 382 Environmental Land Capital Fund 750.81 0.00 39007 Indian River Estates MSBU 181,643.88 0.00 401 Sanitary Landfill Fund 1,462,358.62 0.00 418 Golf Course Fund 24,834.14 0.00 451 S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund 15,124.94 0.00 458 SH Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund 1,139.16 0.00 461 Sports Complex Fund 24,705.16 0.00 471 No County Utility District-Operatin 84,837.82 0.00 478 No Cty Util Dist-Renewal & Replace 7.46 0.00 479 No Cty Util Dist-Capital Facilities 1,289.88 0.00 491 Building Code Fund 3,777.09 2,370.66 505 Health Insurance Fund 157,353.94 4,684.64 505001 Property/Casualty Insurance Fund 2,978.00 0.00 611 Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund 1,441.25 0.00 625 Law Library 188.30 0.00 676 King Orange MSBU Fund 4,619.68 0.00 GRAND TOTAL I 6,464,166.03 28,607.04 ----y' t ~' AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C2A DATE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNìY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre SUBJECT: Resolution No. 06-150 - Extending State of Local Emergency - Ban on Open Air Burning in St. Lucie County BACKGROUND: Due to the drought in St. Lucie County, the Fire Chief has requested that the County extend the ban on open air burning in St. Lucie County. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMEND A TION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Resolution No. 06-150 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Resolution. DC] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 D glas Anderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: ~, Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Public Works Dir: County Eng,: Finance: (Check for copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 RESOLUTION NO. 06-150 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, EXTENDING A STATE OF LOCAL EMERGENCY WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. The Board has adopted Resolution No. 00-277 authorizing the County Administrator and the Public Safety Director to exercise emergency powers and authority during a local emergency. 2. The County Administrator declared a state of emergency on May 3, 2006, at 8:00 a.m. due to drought conditions. 3. The drought has placed St. Lucie County in a state of emergency, exposing the citizens thereof to danger to life and property. 4. In order to respond to such disaster, the County Administrator or his designee is hereby authorized to initiate and take such actions authorized by Section 252.38, F.S. for and on behalf of the Board of County Commissioners during the term of such local state of emergency. 5. Such declaration is extended for seven (7) days until May 24, 2006 at 8:00 a.m. unless sooner rescinded by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County or the County Administrator. 6. This Extension of the Declaration of Emergency shall become effective May 17,2006 at 8:00 a.m. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward XXX Vice Chair Chris Craft XXX Commissioner Joseph E. Smith XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX " PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 2006. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney , AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C2B DATE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONSENT [XX] PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): County Attorney JoAnn Riley Property Acquisition Manager SUBJECT: Library 101 Melody Lane Temporary Construction Easement BACKGROUND: Please see an attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/ A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board grant a Temporary Construction Easement in favor of Boca Ven Land of Fort Pierce, Inc., authorize the Chairman to execute the Temporary Construction Easement and direct staff to record the Temporary Construction Easement in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. !Xl APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: Approved 5-0 [XX] County Attorney: [fly Review and Approvals ] Environmental Resources: ] County Engineer: [XX] Originating Dept.: :Jt't\f- ] Road & Bridge: ]OMB: finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 G:\ACQ\WP\JoAnn\Library\ TCE Agenda Request.wpd - INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: JoAnn Riley, Property Acquisition Manager DATE: May 16, 2006 SUBJECT: Library 101 Melody Lane Temporary Construction Easement BACKGROUND: County staff received a request from Boca Ven Land of Fort Pierce, Inc. for a Temporary Construction Easement. Boca Ven Land is constructing The Renaissance Condominium in downtown Fort Pierce next to the Library. The Renaissance Condominium has a radius of approximately 160 ft. To operate a tower crane freely, the crane boom needs to rotate at an elevation of 120 ft. over a portion of the Library as shown in the attached sketch. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board grant a Temporary Construction Easement in favor of Boca Ven Land of Fort Pierce, Inc., authorize the Chairman to execute the Temporary Construction Easement and direct staff to record the Temporary Construction Easement in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Respectfully submitted, tL~_ ~nnRil~ Property Acquisition Manager G:\ACQ\ WP\JoAnn\Library\ TCE Agenda Memo.wpd 04/24/20B5 15:05 772-429-5252 BOCA 'VEN Lt:ND PAGE 02 . ~ rfÆ,~a C~/é;; ß/lld !I;P;;;;t rÞìt~~<.?e.. JJ;,e-- 0 South 2nd Street Fort Fierce:, Florida 34950 772-42e-5454 772-429-52G2 fax April 24. 2006 81. Lucie County Mr, Doug Anderson At: Debbie Dear Mr. Anderson: As per our conversation, I am enclosing a Draft of a Tem.porary Construction Easement for the airspace over the Cm.mty Library in. Down Town Ft Pierce, as showtl, in, exhibit ''B'' of the enclosed document. The reason we need this easement is that the tower crane necessary for the construction of The ReTlaissance Condominium has a radius of approximately 160 ft and to operate freely. the crane boom needs to rotate at an elevation of 120 ft over the portion of your property shown on the exhibit "B". If you have any question plea.se don't hesitate to caJI me at 772~429-5454. ~~ Eduardo Paris ~ Y Construction ManJer I - - - - I I ~ I I I ~ ~ ~. ~-- ~ I f C1=~~:i:~~~: t -: 64/24/2005 16:05 772-429-5252 BOCA \ÆN LAND PAGE 03 RENAISSANCE ON THE RIVER, A CONDOMINIUM BOUNDARY SURVEY o JO GO I I I==:; I aRAP~IC SCAli IN FŒT ).-~~ \ ~---__ \..'i ~~ ~ / . ~¡-';".:'-'." ~ . . .,~ I·, r "·'1.··.':-·-.. r' .~f~{~ ~..;' , .' . ../ ",/ ,.' /";: ..,,.... '" ". . " ,.'" . .. . ,I i,' . ....: .' ~ L.. ~ \ .,~ .' . ". \ ~~~i "'," ="'..::=, .\ I'};,~¢.t.¡' f8,t"~ . UrtJ ~ "'f' ..... ~~'.~ MIf f'l"1J é- \\ )tÇ'. ,- ?\þ2.t fÍ' ~\.- NOTE: BOUNOARY SURVEY SHOWING EXISTING IMP'ROVEM ENTS. 0' -25-2006 CONSUl TlNG ENGINEERS & LAND SURVEYORS 2980 SOUTH 2Sth SmEET fORT PIERCe:, FLORIO" ,',e I (77~) 4Co<I-3SJ7 Exhibit " A" ":1'"'''' , ," "1'\ ~ This instrument prepared by: JoAnn Riley under direction of Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 TEMPORARY CONSTRUCTION EASEMENT THIS INDENTURE is made and entered into on this day of May, 2006, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, owner of the real property described in Exhibit" A" hereto, and whose mailing address is 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida 34982, hereinafter referred to as GRANTOR, and BOCA VEN LAND OF FORT PIERCE, INC., a Florida Corporation, owner of the real property described herein below, and whose mailing address is 110 South 2nd Street, Fort Pierce, Florida 34950, hereinafter referred to as GRANTEE. (Wherever used herein, the terms "GRANTOR" and "GRANTEE" include all the parties to this instrument and the heirs, legal representatives and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations.) For the sum of $10.00 and other good and valuable considerations, GRANTOR grants a temporary construction easement to GRANTEE, its agents, and employees, with necessary equipment, to enter the airspace over and above the real property described in Exhibit "A" and owned by GRANTOR. This temporary construction easement is for the express purpose of tower crane construction work at GRANTEE's real property described as: Blocks 2 and 3, Riverside Addition to Ft. Pierce, Florida, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, at Page 51, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. This grant of temporary easement will commence July 1, 2006 and will terminate September 30, 2006. On termination, GRANTEE will return the property as nearly as practicable to its original condition. TO HA VE AND TO HOLD the same, together with all rights thereunto belonging, and all the estates, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said GRANTOR, for itself, its successors, tenants and assigns, either in law or equity, limited only to the duration set forth herein, as long as the same is used by the GRANTEE for the purposes of this conveyance. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned GRANTOR has caused these presents to be executed in GRANTOR's name the day and year first above written. ... Signed, sealed and delivered GRANTOR: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Printed Name: BY: Printed Name: CHAIRMAN ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS DEPUTY CLERK COUNTY ATTORNEY G: \ACQ\ WP\J oA nn\Library\ Temporary Construction Easement .wpd 2 ...... --. EXHIBIT' A" LIBRARY - 101 MELODY LANE ALL OF BLOCK I, OF RIVERSIDE ADDITION, AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, AT PAGE 51 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; LESS AND EXCEPT A PARCEL OF LAND AS DESCRIBED IN DEED BOOK 221 AT PAGE 377, BEING RIGHT OF WAY FOR MELODY LANE AND THE NORTH 2.60' FEET OF BLOCK 1, RIVERSIDE ADDITION; AND LESS AND EXCEPT A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN DEED BOOK 247 AT PAGE 61, BEING RIGHT OF WAY FOR MELODY LANE; AND LESS AND EXCEPT A PARCEL OF LAND DESCRIBED IN ORB 258 AT PAGE 1565; AND LESS AND EXCEPT THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PARCEL OF LAND; A PARCEL OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 10, T-35-S, R-40-E, AND BEING AT PART OF BLOCK 1, RIVERSIDE ADDITION AS RECORDED IN PLA T BOOK 3 AT PAGE 51 OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. SAID PARCEL BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS; BEGIN AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ORANGE A VENUE AND THE EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INDIAN RIVER DRIVE; THENCE N 18 28' 42" W ALONG SAID EAST RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF INDIAN RIVER DRIVE A DISTANCE OF 80.56' FEET TO A POINT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH 2.60' FEET OF BLOCK I, RIVERSIDE ADDITION; THENCE N 71 25' 00" E ALONG SAID SOUTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 127.55' FEET; THENCE S 18 28' 42" E A DISTANCE OF 80.56' FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF ORANGE AVENUE; THENCE S 7125' 14" W ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT OF WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 127.55' FEETTO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. PARCEL I.D. 2410-510-0002-000-5. 3 ITEM NO. c3A DATE: May 16, 2006 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: n ~-::t HMdIM~ fÀt..- Donald Pa ley V"" Interim Road & Bridge Manager SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION (4108) SUBJECT: Approve Equipment Request (EQ06-271) to purchase a new 12' X 14' Storage Building from The Shed Man for $3500.00. BACKGROUND: The Road and Bridge Division remodeled the Barn area to create needed office space. In doing so, some storage space was lost. Since remodeling, a portable storage unit has been rented for storage at the cost of $140.00 a month. We have obtained three quotes. Thurman's has the lowest quote but we recommend purchasing from The Shed Man. The Shed Man's quote is $235.00 higher than Thurman, and gives the County a better value for the dollar. The proposed building includes re-enforced walls, corners, top beam and heavy duty skids. The other buildings were of a lesser quality. Savings from the purchase of the Vac- Con Truck (EQ06-170) will be used to fund this equipment request. This storage building will store weed eaters, gas cans, oil, welders and other miscellaneous items. FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN: 101003-4108-564000-400 Capital Equipment & Machinery PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Equipment Request (EQ06-271) to purchase a new 12' X 14' Storage Building from The Shed Man for $3500.00. Approved 5-0 COMMISSION ACTION: .- [X APPROVED rr OTHER [ ] DENIED [x] County Attorney [] Project. Manager [] Road & Bridge [x] Mgt. & Budget ~ Nltvtf'" [x] [] Fiscal Coordinator ~ [x] Public Works Director Purchasing Dept ~þO ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS EQUIPMENT REQUEST FOR FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007 DEPARTMENT: PUBLIC WORKS RECOMMENDED: X YES NO REVISED JUSTIFICATION: This storage building (12' x 14') will be used for storage of weed eaters, gas cans, oil, welders, and other miscellaneous items. Additional office space was needed in the Barn area, causing storage space for these items to be lost. Currently, a portable storage building is being rented to store these items. Additional costs for County permit fees, approximately $300.00. EQUIPMENT REQ#: EQ06-271 ACCOUNT#: 101003-4108-564000-400 The Shed Man 31'1 North U.S. 1 Fort Pierce, FL 772-46'-2696 1801 S.E. Federal Hwy. stuart, FL 772-220-2699 customer '5\. LDC \ "C. CCSù~\.,.J\ Address Phone 3826 10th Avenue North Palm SprinGs, FL ,61-968-'310 I L. Door Ô L R.o",-- uP Window ~ Trim Color úR.~ Roof Color C R. "tr-':<V\ Model GAR!). . .. Size Wall Color C i~ ~,,\ Serial Number ~ ~ Electric No floor ,~ IJ.1 'Dð~ Base Price Windows Door Electric RidGe Vent Other Subtota.l Tax Total Deposit Balance Due ð IR.~~<....:-ÚV --+--------------- D\"*,,a~'f) \X.A"-. ~<;:'$~<':>,-,"j ~w 1ÔC>'"-J -:Joqo . ?-1.S. ~t"'.('\ . 7 "")- +- }.j. c . 'h(>Cfö / ?J50o 'Z. ì<-~ \)~ ""7~(Ò)Ò . Includes delivery, level and anchors Buyer aGrees to purchase the merchandise demlbed above at the price stated and to accept delivery thereof and to mak.e payment of the unpaid balance due as specified above. The deposit made by the buyer shall be applied to the purchase of said merchandise. However, should buyer fail to accept delivery of or pay for merchandise as provided above, the seiler may retain buyer's deposit to compensate for expenses Incurred In connection with this sale. Warranties. all warranties by a manufacturer or supplier are theirs, not the seller's. Buyer's SiGnature 5".q. Date .,~ /' .,J ·C. Seller ..)'" "'> ..........::> --..L" ~ '<> ~r --< <l! o E ~..t ~ '7 ro ~ () '""L --.f""' z .::> / (..:) (y! '.- s z ~ z ~ - - > ~~ ¿ ~ C/) 2: ~ -", Z:J)~ 4( -= ~ r-º ·ë, ~ z " 0::: :r: ~ ::: .. roo r U. --- ~ ,. ~'...... "'- - - - ~ - -----"~~ -7,1/ .....; . -, - /'D ,'-~ ... ~, ^ () ______ ---......, I ...... --- I~ / (í) ,~ ') -- ..-- ,~ . ~ ~ '-J () I ~ ~ w c¡; o /\ " \,) Q -, ~' t:¡ iJ, Qi ~ G ~ \.J ~ t-- ~ ~ ~ \. ...... \J ~' "-I: t--. '-1 1 I '1 ¡ ('" 1)1 " L,' 6" \..,1 --. {'\ I Ni rJ:, ¡. ~i ~' i \, ~ ~ } ~ \'II f ~ ClJ ~' = ~: f ~'",: ~ '11 \ ~ ," .)' ,~ ~i x., ~ \'oJ I - "i ~ cl:! y ~ ~ (., \ Qi :::: ~ \ ,j ()¡ u ... I.... ~ ~' .......; f'1 0: \.' \\J XI ~' ~ ~'- ~, M (f) (f) (j) ~ D D <t: .!) /'}'" Ii ¡! i e- rb /i) ./2 Xltr ~111J/l/};f L-/<;{ ~ 011 c¡ is : ::1' CD, ~; ~i ~ o (ñ ",-, IJ 17 T I Qu ~ JJ e ,'If ~ }Jv+v,...., fJ" t¡'~v~ ,'--' A __ c!2 ,A, 'J?': (/V1VI""- - ~ ~.~ 1. C ¡) e)(::> f] r-;)h/ ~ ~;,., 'C-. 0/0'-"'#"\ 141/ u(> '. ~ ~ ~ S C:K) ;! Z- Y- 7- '7 ~ ,..., ~, r 'r? : ~,.-" ' '- /____ '-' I io-- UR"1.T 4z~ 2/ ~, ~ ') ':) \J q () 0 ì ') 0 , O,¡ I) ') \-,i ~ ~ l., \ ..., 1"\, ~ '-I ~ ~ I ~ \1, N \ ~ \ \'7 M '" I "D CD ~ I cÜ :J ij \....¡ x CL 0 ...¡ ,~ ro ¡.... ~:t:' ro CD i ~ "'::: r I~ \.¡ 0 (/) u I- J) - 0 C ~ 1 .D CD C\J 0. " í " i :J C\J Qj ..,. I C 'v 0- "- i if) (j) ~ 0 CO -.t I 1,,)1 '41 ~- X ---<; V ~ I ~ ..., J ~ <4 0 ~ ~, ~ \. z ." ;: ~ ¡; (' ~ LL 0 ....., .... \., ~ 0 Q ~ ~ ~: 'ti C W \.II E w ~ 1 Jl ~ OJ :E I ~ -' a: cð C"I ~ ~I (j) ~ 0 !:: .X- Q) I...... ~'I ~ D LL :E ~ ~ct' i '1+ CD (f) ~ z a: èd ~ i -I Q), .X- es' "2 ë C\J W D! u ~ tl. 0, :J ë5 2 1 .r:: (j) ¿i ~ U' r- LL U) ~-t "1 " "\. ~: ~ -. , /) r~ U 5/0 /Î7 eJ2 ..sF ¿ l/ ( (I" C ç> (?'O #t 0 r ¡] fll /Jc;. c. I¿ ¡"- /7" .... 1 >-- 2- z-~'J..ì ¡î\ I ~- :X'?\ , \ f'-'v II vp I ----~.. /1- \, -or- \ , -L- I' ,-- o ;.. "Lx J.. ì ~ \' \ ~ >- .c '-- ~' "- > ,- " ' '" c G) IT ~_._> E.I~ IHIII Frank Scavuzzo Sales Associate N ERCE QUOTATION Dated: 05/04/2006 Contract #: 5000-8365 Sales Rep: SCA V 6810 South U.S. 1 Port St. Lucie, Florida 34952 772-465-8190 772-465-9893 Fax ax: 772-465-9893 The Oldest and Largest Shed Manufacturer in Florida Building Style/Size: TUFFY -- 12W x 14L Wall Color/Material: /ALUMINUM Trim Color/Material: /ALUMINUM Roof Color/Material: /ALUMINUM Door Color/Material: /ALUMINUM Skid: 2 - Double 2" x 6" Os Floor: PT 2" x 6" Os On 24" Centers Frame: 2"x 4" 's On 16" Centers Specified Wind Speed: 150 MPH Building Use: Serial Number - CUSTOM ORDER Estimated Ship Date / / OPTION DESCRIPTION 8'W X TH Rollup Garage Door White Raise Walls 12-3/4" per SF = 3 Lap S'W x 9° 1/2" Diamond Threshold White 16"W x 4"H Vent 1 0' Ridge Vent-White 22"W x 27"H White Window QTY 1 1 1 2 1 3 IN 0 SUBTOTAL $4,512,89 E SALES TAX $0.00 CONNECT LABOR TOTAL PRICE $4,512.89 DEPOSIT RECEIVED $0,00 L 14 BALANCE DUE $4,512.89 W12 I have reviewed the adjacent diagram and approve the door location and all other options and their locations. (Initial here) TERMS OF CONTRACT THIS WRITING ENCUMPASSES ALL OF THE TERMS, CONDITIONS, AGREEMENTS, PROMISES, UNDERTAKINGS, AND REPRESENTATIONS OF THE PARTIES AND SHALL CONSTITUTE THE ENTIRE AGREEMENT AMONG THE PARTIES WITH RESPECT TO THE SUBJECT MATTER HERETO, NO ASSERTED REPRESENTATION, STATEMENT, CUSTOM, COURSE OF DEALING, COURSE OF CONDUCT. OR OTHER MATTER NOT EXPRESSLY PROVIDED HEREIN, SHALL CONSTITUTE ANY PART OF THE AGREEMENT OF THE PARTIES WITH RESPECT TO THE SUBJECT MAHER HEREOF, NO EMPLOYEE OF DEALER SHALL HAVE ANY RIGHT WHATSOEVER TO ALTER, AMEND, MODIFY, VARY, ADD TO, TAKE FROM, OR OTHERWISE CHANGE THE TERMS HEREOF, EXCEPT IN WRITING SIGNED BY A DULY AUTHORIZED OFFICER OF TSI (as defined below) AND APPENDED TO THIS WRITING, NO SUCH PURPORTED CHANGE SHALL BE BINDING ON ANY OF TED'S SHEDS (as defined below) OR HAVE ANY FORCE OR EFFECT WHATSOEVER For purposes of this Agreement, the term "Dealer' shall mean the retail dealer identified on the front page of this Agreement, and shall not mean either the manufacturer, TED'S SHEDS, INC, a Florida corporation ('TSI'), the distributor, TSI RETAIL, INC" a Florida corporation ("Retail"), or any other retail dealer of TSI or Retail (Dealer, TSI, and Retail are referred to collectively herein as "Ted's Sheds"), "Customer" shall collectively mean, jointly and severally, any person or persons who signed this Agreement as Customer, and' Agreement" shall mean this Contract of Sale, Customer shall promptly pay the balance due set forth above to Dealer at time of scheduled delivery, Dealer shall not be required to hold any sold unit at Dealer's location for any period in excess of TWO (2) weeks unless prior arrangement is made with Dealer and payment has been made in full, If Customer fails to arrange for delivery of any unit in excess of such TWO (2) week period, Customer shall pay Dealer a late charge of EIGHTEEN (18) percent per annum on the unpaid balance based on the number of days exceeding such period commencing on the date of delivery of the unit to Dealer and terminating on the date such balance is paid in full Customer hereby grants TSI a purchase money security interest in and to such unit and any other of Customer's property in possession of any of Dealer, TSI, or Retail. Customer is responsible for (i) obtaining any permits required for installation of the unit at Customer's desired location, (ii) compliance with any zoning, building, set-back, or other requirements of any applicable governmental authority, (iii) compliance with any covenant, restriction, easement, right-of-way, or other interest or limitation, whether public or private, (iv) any physical characteristic of Customer's orooortv that shall restrict or orohibil deliverv or IIse nf Ihe IIn;f "t th"t Inr"t;nn onrl Iv\ "nv rlom""ø AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. c.-36 DATE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 PRESENTED BY: ~~ TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Entrada Avenue and Rio Mar Drive Landscape Project - Award contract to low bidder, Sunshine Land Design, in the amount of $401,529.60. Bid #06-029 BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. FUNDS AVAIL. Funds will be made available in 1010034113...s63005-39001 Trans Trust- Constitutional Gas Tax PREVIOUS ACTION: n/a RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Board approve awarding of Entrada Avenue and Rio Mar Drive Landscape Project to low bidder, Sunshine Land Design in the amount of $401,529.60, establish project budget, and authorization for the Chairman to sign. [~ 'APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED Approved 5-0 - COMMISSION ACTION: oug M. Anderson County Administrator [x)County Attorney JJ ~ianatw'eS (x)Mgt.& ~W t [x]Proj Mgr. .:..:.....p.. 1']-·- J:t~ [x]Purchasing " [x]Originating Dept. Public Works [ ]Finance Entrada Rio Mar Bid Award to Su ~ ",<,;" DIVISION OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Mike Powley, County Engineer DATE: May 16, 2006 SUBJECT: Entrada Avenue and Rio Mar Drive Landscape Project Award contract to low bidder, Sunshine Land Design, in the amount of $401,529.60. BACKGROUND The Entrada Avenue and Rio Mar Drive Landscape Project provides for landscaping improvements to be placed between U.S. 1 and Entrada Avenue, within the median area. The Project lilmits extend from Rio Mar Drive to Banyan Drive. Additionally, a landscaped median will be constructed on Rio Mar Drive, between the limits of Beach Avenue and U.S. 1. A sprinkler system will be installed using wells as a source of irrigation. Concrete curbing will be placed along the outer perimeter of the landscape medians. On April 19, 2006 bids were received. The low bidder is Sunshine Land Design in the amount of $401,529.60. Currently, funds in the amount of $199,550 are available for the Entrada Avenue Landscape Project. In order to fund the total project budget amount, staff is requesting that the Board move a portion of allocated funding for the Oleander Avenue at Merrit Ditch Culvert Replacement Project to the FY07 budget allowing funds in the amount of 247,133 to be made available in the current budget for the Entrada Avenue and Rio Mar Drive Landscape Project. The project budget will be established as follows: Construction Contract 10% Contingency Testing Expenses $401,529.60 $ 40,152.96 $ 5.000.00 $446,683.00 (138 Project: ntrada Ave RIo ar rive Lan scapin~ Project Bid Date 4/18/2006 Sunshine Land Arazoza Brothers Contract Time: 90 Davs Design, Inc Corporation Bid " , ,', Est. Unit Total Unit Total Item ", Description , Units Quantity Price Price Price Price 101-1 Mobilization LS 1 $12,000,00 $12,000,00 $50,000,00 $50,000,00 101-2A Construction Survey / Record Drawings LS 1 $5,000,00 $5,000.00 $1,500,00 $1,500.00 102-1A Maintenance of Traffic LS 1 $5,000,00 $5,000,00 $30,000,00 $30,000,00 104-11A Turbidity and Pollution Control Devices LS 1 $2,500,00 $2,500,00 $2,500,00 $2,500,00 110-1-1 Clearing and Grubbing LS 1 $12,800,00 $12,800,00 $30,000.00 $30,000,00 331A Pavement LS 1 $6,500.00 $6,500,00 $25,000.00 $25,000,00 520-2-4 Curb, Concrete (Type D) LF 784 $15,00 $11,760.00 $30,00 $23,520.00 575-1-4 SOdding (Bahia) LS 1 $16,000.00 $16,000,00 $7,233.42 $7,233.42 580-326-4 Mulch LS 1 $10,850,00 $10,850,00 $15,000,00 $15,000,00 581-2A Sand Cordgrass EA 213 $8.10 $1,725.30 $8.00 $1,704.00 581-26 Fakahatchee Grass EA 210 $7.20 $1,512,00 $8.00 $1,680.00 582-2A Red Tip Cocoplum EA 770 $7,20 $5,544.00 $8,00 $6,160,00 582-26 Simpson's Stopper EA 238 $9,00 $2,142,00 $10.00 $2,380,00 582-2C Spider Lily EA 681 $8,10 $5,516.10 $9,00 $6,129,00 582-2D Dwarf Yaupon Holly EA 882 $9,00 $7.938.00 $10,00 $8,820,00 582-2E Wax Myrtle EA 251 $7.20 $1,807,20 $9,00 $2,259,00 582-2F Saw Palmetto EA 57 $27,00 $1,539,00 $30,00 $1,710,00 583-2A Southern Red Cedar EA 53 $135.00 $7,155,00 $240.00 $12,720.00 583,26 Live Oak EA 28 $720.00 $20,160,00 $750,00 $21,000,00 583-2C Wax Myrtle EA 35 $126,00 $4,410.00 $145,00 $5,075,00 582-2D Seagrape EA 12 $146.00 $1,752,00 $100.00 $1,200,00 584-4 Cabbage Palm EA 76 $144,00 $10,944.00 $175,00 $13,300,00 590,7 Irrigation System LS 1 $179,900,00 $179,900,00 $153,485.00 $153,485,00 639-1-12A Electrical Power service Assemblies AS 3 $11,500.00 $34,500,00 $8,500:00 $25,500,00 Landscape Maintenance 102-SA Maintenance of Traffic EA 32 $100,00 $3,200,00 $650,00 $20,800,00 570-5A Fertilization of Turf EA 3 $150,00 $450,00 $2,000,00 $6,000.00 570,5B Fertilization of Tree & Plants EA 2 $300.00 $600,00 $1,500,00 $3,000,00 580-325A Turn Existing Mulch EA 2 $800,00 $1,600.00 $5,000,00 $10,000,00 580-326A Supply & Install Red Dyed Recycled Mulch CY 30 $45.00 $1,350,00 $50.00 $1,500,00 580-335A Mowing & Maintenance Services EA 32 $400,00 $12,800.00 $1,200,00 $38,400,00 580-336-1A Pruning & Trimming (Existing Shrubs) EA 3 $1,200.00 $3,600,00 $3,000,00 $9,000,00 580-336-2A Pruning & Trimming (Existing Trees) EA 2 $1,200,00 $2,400,00 $6,000,00 $12,000,00 580-337 A Power Blade Edging EA 16 $125,00 $2,000.00 $450,00 $7,200.00 580-345A Insecticide Treatment EA 3 $175,00 $525.00 $750,00 $2,250,00 580-347-1A Herbicide Application To Cracks In ****** -*..... ._.**- **-.-. .....*. .--*-- ********* Sidewalks ( Concrete Medians Only) EA 6 $75,00 $450,00 $900,00 $5,400,00 580-347-2A Herbicide Application To Planting ****** ****** .-**-- ***..** *****.- -***** ******** Beds, Curbs, etc. EA 9 $400,00 $3,600,00 $1,250,00 $11,250.00 Original Contract Amount (% diff of Low Bid)", $401,529.60 43.1% $574,675.42 E I M D' d ITEM NO. C3c DATE: May 16, 2006 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION (4108) PRESENTED BY: ~~j{~~ OJl"'Donald auley f Interim Road & Bridge Manager TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBJECT: Approve Equipment Request (EQ06-270) to purchase a new 2006 10' Rotary Mower Head for $5,435.00. BACKGROUND: The Road and Bridge Maintenance Section has an existing 2003 Tractor (PR# 40-6589) that had both a boom and drag behind type mower heads. Both of these mower heads continually needed repair. Due to the high costs for repair, Central Services agreed to replace them with a new 2006 10' drag behind Rotary Mower Head from Everglades Farm Equipment Company for $5,435.00. After we received the new mower head, it was determined that we needed to purchase this equipment from a Road & Bridge Capital Equipment account. Savings from the purchase of the Vac-Con Truck (EQ06-170) will be used to fund this equipment request. This equipment is used daily to mow right-of-way areas and ditch banks. FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN: 101003-4108-564000-400 Capital Equipment & Machinery PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Equipment Request (EQ06-270) to purchase a new 2006 10' Rotary Mower Head for $5,435.00. ]C] APPROVED [ ] OTHER [ ] DENIED Approved 5-0 E: COMMISSION ACTION: [xl County Attorney [I Project, Manager [I Road & Bridge [xl Mgt. & Budget ~ [I Fiscal Coordinator ~XI [x] ---- Dougl Anderson County Administrator Public Works Director Purchasing Dept ~ "r""'I. __ ...__..... _... _-..__ -=-...-,'............ (sen~ 1T72)4M~ (8&:II7..·1~1 ¡~;~~;~~;~~;;~l·~~O.r::IJ unì IB1..10 ~w'WP.,..11oI IHI' TO: IOLD TO: ST. LUCIE COUNTV/BOQRD CQMMISSIONERS 2300 VIRGINIA AVE FORi' PIERCE FL 34982 " 51, /t¡¡t~.CIE COUNTY IBOARD ::; fn#'¡~¡, '., : :.i!~.~<':;'''1·.... ~;'n~ '!¡:¡ ,:; ..... 1 Sub· Total LeIS Peyotf(s) ~ ~'" Allowance ..111,* Dut ~ ; DUE WITHIN 10 OAYS O¡r DATE OfIINYOICEi, ANNUAL PIAClNTAGE FlAT! 0' 18% ON TM. I ~ UNPAID BALANCE. ~ SIGNATURIi e ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS EQUIPMENT REQUEST FOR FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 APPROVED: YES NO NO REVISED REVISED DEPARTMENT: DIVISION: PUBLIC WORKS ROAD & BRIDGE - DRAINAGE RECOMMENDED: X YES JUSTIFICATION: This 10' Rotary Mower Head will replace a 6' boom mower head and a drag behind mower head that are attached to a 2003 Tractor (PR# 40-6589). These old mower heads need continuous repair and it is more cost effective to replace with a new one. This equipment is used daily to mow right-of- way areas and ditch banks. EQUIPMENT REQ#: EQ06-270 ACCOUNT#: 1 01 003-41 08-564000-400 v AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C "301. DATE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DIVISION 4115 SUBJECT: Award of RFP #06-026 - Professional Engineering Services for Construction Management. BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: January 17, 2006 - Board authorized staff to advertise for continuing contracts. RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests Board approve the shortlist and grant permission to negotiate with the top four ranked firms: Kimley-Hom and Associates, Inc., LBFH, Inc., PBS&J, and Stanley Consultants, Inc., and authorize the Chairman to sign contracts as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: [JCJ APPROVED [ ] OTHER: [ ] DENIED Approved 5-0 ----- Dougla nderson County Administrator [x]County Attorney [x]Originating Dept. Public Works ~ \1 construction mgt. rfp award.ag (I Ch gA' Coordination/SiGnatures ( IMgt, & Budget 6i [x)Ptm:haing 21 r [x]Exec. Asst. f3C1rn. [ ]ather #" i " I . DIVISION OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Mike Powley, County Engineer IUVf DATE: May 16, 2006 SUBJECT: Award of RFP #06-026 - Professional Engineering Services for Construction Management BACKGROUND On January 17, 2006, the Board authorized staff to begin the selection process for professional engineering services for construction management. Two thousand one vendors were notified, seventy- one documents were distributed, and eight proposals were received. On May 5, 2006, the selection committee reviewed the responses and shortlisted four firms: 1 . Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 2. LBFH, Inc. 3. PBS&J 4. Stanley Consultants, Inc. ( ) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PURCHASING DEPARTMENT ED PARKER, DIRECTOR TABULATION SHEET - RFP# 06-026 PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES - CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT OPENED: APRIL 26, 2006 AT 2:00 P.M. THE FOLLOWING EIGHT (8) COMPANIES SUBMITTED A PROPOSAL: 1) Arcadis Contact: Patrick Ferland, P.E. or Howard B. Sole, CVS Phone: (772) 878-1700, Fax: (772) 878-1802, Address: 590 N.W. Peacock Road, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986 2) Captec Enaineerina. Inc. Contact: Joseph W. Capra, P.E., President Phone: (772) 692-4344, Fax: (772) 692-4341 Address: 300 S.W. St. Lucie Avenue, Stuart, Florida 34994 3) Expert Construction Manaaers. Inc. Contact: William L. Brown III Phone: (813) 657-7810, Fax: (813) 571-0875 Address: 2810 Brucken Road, Valrico, FL. 33594 4) Faithful & Gould Contact: Jim Pustejevsky Phone: (407) 875-0707, Fax: (407) 875-0726 Address: 2500 Maitland Center Parkway, Suite 311, Maitland, Florida 32751 5) Kimlev-Horn and Associates. Inc. Contact: Rick Oliver, Project Manager Phone: (772) 345-3800, Fax: (772) 286-0138 Address: 10521 S.W. Village Center Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34987 6) LBFH. Inc. Contact: James C. Lynon, P.E., Vice President Phone: 772) 461-2450, Fax: (772) 465-1225 Address: 2222 Colonial Road, Suite 201, Fort Pierce, Florida 34950 7) PBS&J Contact: Reynaldo Cortez, P.E., Vice President, Division Manager Phone: (772) 778-3035, Fax: (772) 778-6407 Address: 2001 9th Avenue, Vero Beach, Florida 32960 8) Stanlev Consultants. Inc. Contact: Mark Weber, P.E., Project Principal Phone: (772) 545-7211, Fax: (772) 545-7210 Address: 8493 S.E. Pine Circle, Hobe Sound, Florida 33455 NUMBER OF COMPANIES NOTIFIED*: 2001 NUMBER OF BID DOCUMENTS DISTRIBUTED*: 71 NUMBER OF BIDS RECEIVED: 8 *per demandstar.com IfõJr, m rn ß WI m fßI l1ù! APR 2 73D) ~U¡ L ENG!NEER'N.~ JOSEPH E SMITH. District No,1 . DOUG COWARD, District NO.2. PAULA A. LEWIS, District NO.3. FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, District NO.4. CHRIS CRAFT, District NO.5 County Administrator - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue - Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 - Phone (772) 462,1700 - TDD (772) 462-1428 website: www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. L 3 c. DATE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DEPT SUBJECT: Lennard Road 1 MSBU Approval of Amendment NO.5 to Work Authorization NO.8 to the Agreement for Engineering Services with Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAIL: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: March 21 2006 - Board approved Amendment NO.4 to Work Authorization No. 8 to the Agreement for Engineering Services with Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Amendment NO.5 to Work Authorization No. 8 to the Agreement for Engineering Services with Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. to extend the allotted time to complete all tasks to, no later than, four months after the completion of construction. COMMISSION ACTION: ENCE: ~ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 uglas M. Anderson County Administrator ~. Coordination/Sianatures ~, ,Mgt. & Budget [x]MSBU Coor 'J2p [X ]purChas¡ngdL [x]County Attorney [x]Public Works Dir ~r ~ . [ IFinance { COMMISSION REVIEW: ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM No. 06-014 TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners Myh Michael V. Powley, County Engineer r May 8, 2006 Lennard Road 1 MSBU Approval of Amendment NO.5 to Work Authorization NO.8 to the Agreement for Engineering Services with Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. BACKGROUND On June 6, 2000, the Board created the Lennard Road1, Lennard Road2 and Lennard Road3 MSBU Projects to construct roadway, water and sewer improvements to a portion of the Lennard Road Phase II Project and authorized the County Engineer to proceed with the final engineering, permitting and design of the MSBU Projects. On September 26, 2000, the Board approved Work Authorization No. 8 with Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. to prepare the final engineering design of the roadway, water, and sewer improvements for the MSBU projects, and for the environmental assessment and surveying. On April 3, 2001, the Board approved Amendment No. 1 to Work Authorization No. 8 to the Agreement for Engineering Services with Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. in a deductive amount of ($6, 020.00) to omit the Environmental Assessment and Permitting Services relative to that portion of Lennard Road lying outside of the boundaries of the Lennard Road 1,2,&3 MSBU project. On August 26, 2003, the Board approved Amendment NO.2 to Work authorization NO.8 to the Agreement for the additional Engineering Scope of Services with Culpepper & Terpening, Inc., which required Wetland Delineation and Blood Sampling for the Environmental Assessment portion of the project. On April 6, 2004, the Board approved Amendment NO.3 to Work Authorization NO.8 to the Agreement for Engineering Services with Culpepper & Terpening Inc., for Task 10, Surveying Services, Task 11, Design and Permitting Modifications, Task 12, Landscaping Services, and Task 13, Fencing. On March 26, 2006. the Board approved Amendment NO.4 to Work Authorization NO.8 to provide additional Engineering Services for Design, Assessment, and Acquisition purposes. The subject Amendment No. 5 to Work Authorization No. 8 will extend the allotted time to complete all tasks to, no later than, four months after the completion of construction. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends approval of Amendment NO.5 to Work Authorization NO.8 to the Agreement for Engineering Services with Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. Cc: Staff concurring G:\ENG\MSBU\WORD\MSBU Projects\Lennard Rd\Agendas & Legal Docs\AGA-ENG8.doc - AMENDMENT No.5 WORK AUTHORIZATION NO.8 Engineering Services C97-11-186 For North Lennard Road and Prima Vista Boulevard Extension Roadway Improvement Project MSBU Project (Savannah Ridge Elementary School to Silver Oak Drive) Pursuant to that certain Agreement Between County and Engineer for Continuing Professional Engineering Services (the "Agreement") between St. Lucie County (the "County") and Culpepper and Terpening, Inc., (the "Engineer") dated November 25,1997, the Engineer agrees to provide the additional Scope of Services described in Exhibit "A" and for the Compensation described in Exhibit "B". All services provided under this Work Authorization shall be completed according to the schedule described in the Amended Exhibit "C". IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County and the Engineer have executed this Work Authorization, this day of ,2006. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: CULPEPPER AND TERPENING, INC. BY: Print Name: Title: .' AMENDED EXHIBIT "C" PROJECT SCHEDULE Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. will complete the tasks associated with Exhibit "A" in accordance with the following schedule: All Tasks (Including No.1 through No. 17) will be completed as follows: Prior to the Construction period, including the duration of the Construction period, and continuing no later than 4 months after Completion of Construction. ~ · '(iLCULPEPPER & -~'=TERPENING, INC: Consulting Engineers · Land Surveyors 2980 South 25th Street . Ft. Pierce, FL 34981 (772) 464-3537 . Fax (772) 464-9497 www.ct-eng.com Sender's Email: smatthes@ct-eng.com April 21, 2006 VIA: HAND DELIVER Job 00-84 Contract Mr. Craig Hauschild, PE Assistant County Engineer St. Lucie County Engineering Department 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 IroJ(~ rn U\Y1 Œ m Uù A21. æJl ENGINEERING RE: Work Authorization No.8 North Lennard Road Dear Mr. Hauschild: This letter is to request an extension of time for Work Authorization No.8 for Lennard Road. The extension is due to permitting difficulties with the U.S. Army Corp of Engineers. We anticipate that our design services will be complete in full by the end of2006, with inspection services to follow in 2007. Thank you for your consideration of this request. Should you have any questions or need further information, please feel free to contact our office. Sincerely, CULPEPPER & TERPENING, INC. SKM:pw P:\Proj-2000100-84 N Lennard Road WA #8(Roadway)IContractlOO-84 SLC 001. request for extension,doc AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO: C-4a DATE: May 16,2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks & Recreation PRESENTED BY: Debbie Brisson Interim Director SUBJECT: Fairgrounds water Plant Capacity Expansion/Approval to Bid BACKGROUND: Of the 266,399 gallons of water used during the 10 day Fair, 158,500 had to be hauled in by Road & Bridge. The water treatment plant is currently capable of only producing 10,000 gallons per day. It has been anticipated for some time that the water treatment plant would need to be expanded to a 50,000 per day capacity in order to accommodate the Fair and other large events that may be held at the Fairgrounds. If the plant's capacity is not expanded prior to next years fair, Road & Bridge has indicated that we must be prepared to have trucks and tankers run several hours a day. Also, these tanker trailers may not be available for rent when needed. Staff is requesting permission from the Board of County Commissioners to go to bid for the project. Currently there is $180,000 budgeted for the project. Preliminarv quotes have been obtained and the lowest responsive, responsible quote submitted was in the amount of $397,000. Staff is requesting that the BOCC approve the use of $217,000 from Park "B" Impact Fees for this project due to the urgency as outlined. PREVIOUS ACTION: Please see attached approved April 11 , 2006 Agenda Item C-4b FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE: 316-7420-563000-7689) (Fairgrounds Water Plant Expansion) 310002-7420-563000-7689(Fairgrounds Water Plant Expansion) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve its request to go bid for the Fairgrounds Water Plant Expansion Project and approve the use of $217,000 from Park "B" Impact Fees for additional funding of the project. COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 Dou Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: Originating Dept: l'r'" 4::) I Coordination/S iq natures V I L1 / )'1'\ h x-::. Mgt & BÙdget: .¡tAv ~ Public Works: Other: , I"¿~ -.. / Purchasing: ~?í Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) ~ L. ~ - " Parks and Recreation Department Memorandum To: Board of County Commissioners From: Linda Barton, Assistant Director ~/ Subject: Approval of Agenda Item #C-4 Date: 5/5/2006 Of the 266,399 gallons of water used during the 10 day Fair, 158,500 had to be hauled in by Road & Bridge. The water treatment plant is currently capable of only producing 10,000 gallons per day. It has been anticipated for some time that the water treatment plant would need to be expanded to a 50,000 per day capacity in order to accommodate the Fair and other large events that may be held at the Fairgrounds. If the plant's capacity is not expanded prior to next years fair, Road & Bridge has indicated that we must be prepared to have trucks and tankers run several hours a day. Also, these tanker trailers may not be available for rent when needed. Staff is requesting permission from the Board of County Commissioners to go to bid for the project. Currently there is $180,000 budgeted for the project. Preliminary quotes have been obtained and the lowest responsive, responsible quote submitted was in the amount of $397,000. Staff is requesting that the BOCC approve the use of $217,000 from Park "B" Impact Fees for this project due to the urgency as outlined. LB: em Attachment cc: D. Anderson, County Administrator R. Wazny, Assistant County Administrator Chron File ~ "0 .& <õ :.c; o :;¡ Ò ~ £:? :;¡ ..- Q) o èi; tJ) Ll) C\1 0 üí ¡;¿¡ ~ ó Q) M Ë '- en Q) WIDID.Q o 0 E W 0 ¡:;: Q) U.~ë;;g. t;o~U) ....:;;:_.... ~~ oS Q. 0 tJ) tJ) ~ gj C\1 ~ enê¡j~~ ~ :;¡ tJ) ü: 0:: a¡ a¡ ê¡j « ð) ~ Õ Q.c::wz J!:! CIO C1I g .5 N~ .... () ....~ o ;:) oa¡ N U & ¡¡ ::I g~ NO ~ .... ID () o~ o ;:) Na¡ In ¡¡ o ::I o ... N:J. ~~ 0'" N:J. J!:! Ø) C1I g .5 N~ 0Ll) CDLl) r-- en LÒÓ CD co CDN &'t..: &'t cor-- ..-Ll) It) en "¡ai r-- ..- Ll)N &'t..: &'t CD"<t "<ttO Ll)CO t6~ tOtO q, "(-~ ..- ..- &'t &'t entON enMLl) r--........... "':"¡a5 o"<ten COM&'t Ñ&'t &'t en CO enr-- ":."<t r--Ñ 00 ~q N ..- &'t &'t to r-- ..- M ~Ll) Ll)cD "-0 "<t. ..- N ...... &'t &'t r-- to en "<t Ll)_ "<t ......Ñ COLl) oo:t:. O. ...... ..- &'t &'t ~ II) ~ ... ft Q. ~ ::I ¡ÞS! 0= õ~ !:2 c ..... 0 'ª iii g: ::I I!! ::I o () c ~ ë () ...~~ ~()a:: c CII 't o u.. () Bû)'Ü'; c I!! ~ .5 .!!!SEiii IIIC-W m~..J_ 2'en(l)o .5 g¡ 0. ~ êC~In '=, CII of en Qí' ~ III g: ma::o...J ro.... "<t1D OlD .,¡ (..¡ tOCIO ~OC!. ...... ~ roClO en.... en"<t óM" to(') I~ '"':. ...... ~ MID en...... 0(') a5r:ñ Ll)1D ~~ ~ "<t(') N In ..... ...... OÓ Ll)1D ~~ ~ l¡ø o Õ !:2 ...... õ o o Ó Ll) N ~ lõ o o ó o M ~ IÕ o o ó Ll) ~ 'í!)I¡;:; Nen "<tN "'¡C"i ..-M I~ ..- ~ roen ..-"<t r--en ,..:.,¡ "<tM ..- r-- ....... ~ ~ roo ..-to r--r-- r--- LÒ tOtO Oto ..:~ I~ ~Ir coco en..- r--Ll) ~ ~. Ll)Ll) ..:~ ~ ~I\... ~ r-- ..- ..... r-- r--M aió to CO .....0 ~g r= r--tO g;jl; ~~ tOo Ñ ~~ I~~ ~en Ll)en Mr-- .,¡,..: ......0 r--co ~Ñ ~ - r--tO N ..- oo:t:.to COLÒ ...... ..- ..-"<t ~Ñ ~ ... Q) 0> 8:. lõ o o ó Ll) N I~ õ o o ó r-- "<t ~ OLl)MO ONeno O"<tNO LÒ"'¡C"iLÒ r--..-MN ~~,... ~ ,~ -.; ~ ;;.;. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ =c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'w en &¡¡ i § § § § § § § ~ § § § § § § § § § § § § § ~ ¡ ~ M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M ~ M M M M M 0 C W ~w -~ 00 00 00 ÓLÒ oco Ll)~ ~ 'ô o o Ó o ..- ~ IÔÕ oco 00 óC\Í Ll)...... M"<t !~~ í!)¡;:; N en "<tN "'¡C"i ..-M ,~ ..- I-I~ .... CIO o Ó In N M" ~ õ Ll) o C"i ~ ..... ..- ~ ;:: ...... ...... ,..: ~ - M M co íÕÑ Nen "<tN "¡C"i ..-M ~..- ~ 00 Ll)0 00 C"iC\Í ~~ ~ oenMOOOentOo"<t 8~tõ888;j1;~8~ óLÒC"ióa5óóLÒr--...... ......"<t......MenLl)N~Ll)r-- ~~~~...........M-~r-- &'t~&'t -~ o o o Ó Ll) Ll) ~ Ll)..- N en "<tN "¡C"i ..- M ~...... -~ (') In ...... Ñ ('I In M" ~ lôlcr; r-- co NO I~ .,¡ N ~ -- Ll)r-- NLl) "<tr-- "'¡C\Í ..-M I~""" I-I~ 1- _ ~~ "<to aiC"i ~~ léÕ N M Ó r-- "<t I~ (') "<t o ..¡ (') In Ñ tI't ã> lõ r-- "<t r--. r-- M I~ "<t ~ CõÑ en ...... COO ~C'\Ì ~; CII ::I C ~ CII a:: B o ~ () 'æ ~ ~ 3 ~ ~ - Ie;¡ C/) II) E ~c:: ~ EQc:: c:: ~ ~ ~~ ~co~~ ~c ! ~ I~[ ~ Qii,~ ~~ "1:) c:: < e~~~~Q"1:) ~~ _ Q Q - '::::: ~ ..... 0..;; "'" ::t ~ .Q § !~ ~C\1~S~_~ Eol~I~_Qæ ~ o~ _Q~C/)SC\1C/) ~I~~'" EE~I~-~~~&~~~~~Q~~~§~... ~~Q~~JC\1S1~~~c::"'"~œLIJC\1~~-c::Q ~~~~E~tQ~~~go~~yO"1:)~~Q ~~~iø~~Ø%U~ø&QO";;S&c::EII)u §~g~¡æ~~c::C\1s8~~~~1~!~~I~ ~&~~~'~i~~2æ&&~2Q~~i!§~ ~~ ~~O~~~'...C/)___CI)~U~~, E~ ~i~6~C\1Q<C\1< .:cww -C/)~ EQ ~~C::IXI ~:;~~C\1gg~~~tælºC/)ol; ~OO&Q~~.:cC\1~O~~§§uðc::&~uG "1:)uu iC\1QQQti~~~ee~~C\1 '~C::Q ~j§~~~...I~~~!!12~~81!i~ &~~~88~~~~~~~œœð~8~œ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 M 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ § ~ ~ ,\ .. ~ 1-< ~.... ¡ -:' AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO: C-4b DATE: April 11 , 2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [X] INVESTl\IENT FOR THE FUTURE TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks & Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh~ Director SUBJECT: Fairgrounds water Plant Capacity Expansion BACKGROUND: Of the 266,399 gallons of water used during the 10 day Fair, 158,500 had to be hauled in by Road & Bridge. The water treatment plant is currently capable of only producing 10,000 gallons per day. It has been anticipated for some time that the water treatment plant would need to be expanded to a 50,000 per day capacity in order to accommodate the Fair and other large events that may be held at the Fairgrounds. In August 2006, the Bikers Roundup is scheduled with an anticipated 40,000 people in attendance. This is double the Fairs' attendance for this year. If the plant's capacity is not expanded prior to the Bikers Roundup Event, Road & Bridge has indicated that we must be prepared to have 2 trucks and 2 tankers run 10-15 hours a day. Also, these tanker trailers may not be available for rent when needed. In the FY 06/07, staff is requesting $180,000 for the water treatment expansion project to accommodate the Fair and future events. However, due to the urgency of completing the project prior to the Bikers Roundup as outlined in Scott Herring's March 21 memorandum, staff is requesting to use $180,000 of the $565~713 IFF Ravenswood Splash Park project allocation. When the FY 06/07 budget is acproved, the $180,000 will need to be re-allocated to the Ravenswood Splash Park for completion of the project. Staff requests that the SOCC grant permission for staff to go to bid for the water treatment expansion project. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE: 316-7420-563000-7689 (Improvements Other Than Buildings) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Soard of County Commissioners approve reallocation of $180,000 IFF dollars from the Ravenswood Splash Park Project to the Fairgrounds' water treatment plant expansion project and grant permission for staff to go to bid for the Fairgrounds' water treatment expansion project. COMMISSION ACTION: [X1 APPROVED [ ) OTHER: [ ] DENIED CONCURRENCE: 1/ ~/ Dou ndérson County Administrator Approved 5-0 Coord ination/S ianatures County Attorney: Originating Dept: )!+-o ";'-" ", ,: ,'I 17 ____- (/- IV Mgt & Budget: \~AA ' Public Works: . !\f'\ I i " \ \\\\~ '; ~ \"::._\ Purchasing: Othe r: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if appiicable) ~/ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO: C4:B DATE: May Í6, 2006 REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT [ X] TO: SAINT LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks and Recreation PRESENTED BY: Debra Brisson SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR FEE WAIVER BACKGROUND: The Parks and Recreation Department has been approached by Project HOPE, a project of the Department of Children and Families, for a waiver of rental fees to use the Lincoln Park Community Center on June 3, 1006. The group would like to hold a Hurricane Expo Grand Finale to culminate a weeklong "Hurricane Awareness Week", intended to provide residents in the City of Fort Pierce access to their services and information for the upcoming hurricane season. The anticipated revenue for this event is $300 in rental fees and $100 in houseman fees for six hours. See attached memo. FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN: N/A ~~ RECOMMENDATION: if;, ú-- Staff requests lÌirectioll cø mmg waiver ofthe fees for Project HOPE to use Lincoln Park Community Center for an event on June 3, 2006. COMMISSION ACTION: [ ~ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CONCURRENCE: Approved 5-0 Dod~ County Administrator ,;Y County Attorn,y' ~..~ Manag,ment & Budg,,, Originating D'P" -;; . . .. Oth,,, H:\AGENDAS 05-06\5-23-06 LPCC FEE WAIVER. DOC Coordination/Signatures Purchasing: Admin/F inance (if applicable) / /' o\ect H.Q,o ,~ ~7~: ~"ø J ,/' Ot"~..\,,tf(fl' , \ Project HOPE Department of Children and Families Substance Abuse and Mental Health 337 N. 4th St. Suite A Rm. 307C Ft. Pierce, Florida 34950 772-595-1350 Fax 772-429-2049 Mr. Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Dear Mr. Anderson: Project HOPE is a not for profit agency which provides outreach, referrals, resources, and crisis counseling to individuals in the community who have been impacted by hurricanes. Project HOPE crisis counselors meet with children, adults, and the elderly in the community, and provide presentations to educate the community on effective ways to deal with the stress caused by the hunicanes and allow for a venue for people to express their feelings and develop age - appropriate ways of coping. Project HOPE delivers a strong message of HOPE to the community through active listening, stress management, support groups, hunicane groups, art and reading activities, and linkage to service providers if applicable. We want to mobilize the community of Saint Lucie County through effective partnerships with local agencies, community leaders, and state officials to positively affect hunicane survivors' recovery. As a result of the past severe Hurricane seasons, Project HOPE has been assisting survivors in Indian River, Martin, Okeechobee and St Lucie Counties in understanding their current situation and assisting them in reviewing their options, as well as helping them develop coping strategies to help them return to their pre-disaster level of functioning. Through our door to door canvassing of the most hard-hit areas, we have come across many survivors who are still trying to work on their recovery plans. They are also very much aware of the fast approaching hurricane season. We have also been providing Hurricane education and information to many members of the community as well as crisis counseling when appropriate. It is in this spirit, Project HOPE and our community partners are organizing a Hurricane Awareness Week for May 28 - June 3, 2006 in St. Lucie County. To make this a successful week of events for survivors, we're asking for your support. We are attempting to secure Lincoln Park Community Center as the site for our Hurricane Awareness Week Final Event. i o\ect H.D þ ~ X / --/ ".¡-J' Ou,.PIPOPle1nt{(\ Last year, Project HOPE enjoyed outstanding community support culminating in proclamations for Hurricane Awareness Week by the Mayor, city council and county commissioners. Project HOPE is partnering with the community, city and comty officials, social service agencies and local businesses to provide the activities for Hurricane Awareness Week 2006. For your infonnation, please find attached calendar of events. We have targeted the city of Ft. Pierce for this year's final event to provide the community members access to our services and infonnation for the upcoming hurricane season. Our grant does not allow us to fimd raise or handle money. In order to organize and plan our Hurricane Awareness, we are forced to solicit donations and sponsorships from the St. Lucie County Community. It is in this spirit that Project HOPE is respectfully requesting that the fees for the rental of Lincoln Park Community Center be waived. Your cooperation and assistance in this matter will be greatly appreciated. If your need additional information, please feel free to contact me at (772) 429-2085 or (772) 360-9096. Thanks for your support. Sincerely, . ~«<.~~W~ Project HOPE Team Leader :r "-. .... ~. ~ ~:; n ". (1)=~~""0::r S' (1) §: ::r ~. c:T ~ ~ 3 VI ~ ~ n :; -. ¡:; e- (1) ~ 0 sa ::r n . ::r (1) ::-. ~ :¡ :: ~. ... -6' ::r l' ¡:: ~ sa:;a ......... '" '"' 3 '" (1) ¡:: .... ... '-' n '" ,.,..,; S' ¡:: :; '" n g. ~ ~ a êj s, 2.. [(Q a :::: ~ (6' c:T:=:< ~ (1) '"r1 ..... n ::r ~ .;- "C n ~ 0"(1)::r~ õo::r~::I (1) ¡:;o :;:: n < ~ ~ .... c:T l' _. e: ;, n E ~ "C (1). '" -. - (1) n ~ 0 (1) ... -. 0 a 0 c.. ~ ~ ~ (Q ::! '" -< ¡¡;"'''' ~~"'c..~_::so . (to ~_(1)(1)::r~-' 0...... '" g"VI (1) o,=,,> ::rrr o....¡t: -. n [ .... ::;¡ 0 ~ ~ 5. ~ ~ "C ~ l' ::I ~ '" z ~ c:T::! Lo :::- ..... 5. -. ~. 0 "C ::r -. ¡:: ~ 0 ët 0 .... n :I: 0 ::S 0 "'::r ~ (Q 3 0 ~ c.. n ~ ¡: (Q ::r ~ ::E 0 x '" 3 3. (1) .... (Q ::r _. g < (1) -. c..c..o~~"'3n~~·nN~~c:T~ (1)~(1) ~ (1) ;:!. n '" ~ '" ~ ... ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ¡;j n c..~(1)::r(1)-o~~c..~~o~g"....ët.~~~o ¡:: 0 '" (1) '" 0 <: c.. -. (1) V\;::I '="> '< <: :::; ~. o~::::""o", (Q-6"0~_ ::::§ . E.:; êj f!!... <: - 0 ~. _ -. .... 0 - .~ ::r= c.. ~ g""C o~ '< ~ tJ _ n ~ui ...."-. S. '-' 0 :r(Q -. n ~ ....". ::rffi c:r~::r... n < 0 =<...... ..... (1) .... (1) ~ ¡:: 0 ~ n ~ 0 (1) ~ ::r "" ~ -..... ¡:: n c:T ~ ~ ~ ¡:: en __ ('þ 'E. a- ::!. O'Q -. Q) ~ < :5. ~ o g ~ ~ E. 2 ::r ~ n ~ S' = ñ' 03 ~ ~ g õ' ~ g Er ~ ri (Q 0" ~ ::-.~ c..~ n _ ~ _ '" CJ)n ¡:¡ 3 § c:T S' c:T '" Er..... 0 S:!'"'" n §",êj_~~n~Ergl'g~ -. ~ ,.,.. 0 n ~ N '" n - ::: 0.. "'C -< -. '" 2 '" ~ 0 !ij' - '" C. ~ "C §:êj_:;' ~~gõn_-< ::so..:::: c..f!!... 2.. ri"g õ5"'O ,",~o<n:;:o ~ '-;0.... ~.. .... o "'õ.:-...n SO~na'~o ..... c. tñ . c ~ ..... ~ z ~ S "'s' n ::t ~n::SÕ' "'0 ::-. -. 0...... n '" "'0 o(Q....S"'n- ~ ::r n "'..... ,o, ~g-g~.~¡::::E .., _. 0 ..... -0 _. ~F°æ.= "-. ~c..~;¡o:: c:T n Er g. c:T ". :r ;:¡ ;;!::e ~ OQ S' S' '"' n < n .... a "" '"0:; - _ - '::1 c.. _0 < '-; n 1:1' - .., 0 -. ~ ,. '-' "_ ::::t ~ ~ c.. ~ ¡:: ::r .... ::t a .., S' c.. c.. n 0 0 S -<: :-" '9. ri g,!§. ~ g ¡:: n .g. (Q õ ~ ¡j; æ.. ~ c.. e¡ "'0 g. ~ '"r1..... n n 3. ri ~ '" '" '" e¡ '< n3 '"r1Q.."" ~ 0 ....-.'" ~ n -- ~ ¡:: ::e ~ 0 . g, t;ï ~ ~ ~ ::s n. ~ ~ '" ::I c:r -'::1 ¡:: n S n"'~~""'~ ~(t::ec..3= Era f!!...~ '" ~ 3 ñ;:::I;in c..::"'s. ::"'c:Tõ· 0 ~Er:;~~o::rg"n õ::r::r~n_ -. n=g"(1)""n ~ ~~;:¡ N _"'ONO '"r1 -..., 0 0 .... þ-c -. 3~oa::-.(1)~ VI 0" n (1) VI ;:!. ri 8 .... '"r1 t'1'1 - (1) ~ a ::r go rr (Q 3 1:1'::s ~ c..::S~¡:;"'''':; n"",,,, n c.. - :¡ ::-. '" -. g, ~ 0 "C ~ ~õ' -. 0 ('þ ~ -on ~ 0 ªQ~§g§i~~~s~ S' ::-. n n g-;:¡ g ~ ~ ~ VI n 0 c.. '" .., '" .... ... c..::I ñ' n S' ~ :r = ~ .- ,....., . !ij' ~ e; (Q ~ ~. c:T b;' -. 0 ..... -.., n ~ -O~::r <: o ~ . n nr""JIJz~-<~~4'n n o S' S' ~.~ g ~ ::I Ñ·=' ::s 0 an=(Q"".....~g-nõ: n3 Z as:.;" g: ~ ::r::l VI a ri ~ óQ' 3 OJ 0 = = ~ 0 = > ~. <' ~ ~. g: ~ 5' § = "'0 ::: .... ~ ~ '" ~ (1) ",' (Q 0 ::. (Q _ ::; = - Z c.. n .... 5. ~ g: VI -< -. 0 '<"r::roao~ ::E>o ~~ ....;II:'~30~Õ'::r~n""::rõ(Q , J _ .... 0 _ ª ¡:: '< ::-. '" (1) (Q ..... '"0 ~ -~c..n :::ty.><:-6"n::r·3 = ~ ~ ~ _. -'. _0..... en ..... c::""" ....a.n =-. o::r· ~ = §' õ' § ~ (Q ~ -¡ñ ?n' . x ~en~ ::aem <z... ñOo m~n en ° " m z m ocs8 ~Xo """-mo ° " en ex "e "::a !(! on "Þ _z <m m men 0... 00 -I::a xm en n< 0° ZC ...... mX enÞ ...~ Þ" "m " ::aCÞ.,. om"- Þno::a <-zen JIIo'" "'m -::a °en Z :c C "II(i)m::a ¡::ax::a -Þ"- ....zon r-_ ItÞ m- z m :¡¡¡I~ -~ ~~ ~~ ~= -= ~~ w= ~~ :¡¡¡I~ ..~ ~~ w= =~ ~ :¡¡¡If!"'! S! w~ -= ~ ~ .. ;.- ..~ 2; f!"'!= -~ ~ () » I m Z~ oQ »~ :;:u I L- C :) (1) ""W -~ i= ~= w= ~ ;.~ ~~ ~= f!"'!= w~ ~ o m < m Z -i <..n ... t l ~ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C5 DATE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBUC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Debra Brisson, Director SUBMITIED BY (DEP1ì: Cultural Affairs SUBJECT: Purchase of Sculpture for display at Heathcote Botanical Gardens as part of the Art in Public Places Program's pennanent inventory. BACKGROUND: "A Saplings' Canopy", a sculpture by North Carolina artistJason Lasko has been on loan, through the St. Lucie County Art in Public Places program, to Heathcote Botanical Gardens for over a year. The Art in Public Places Committee negotiated with the artist and agreed on a price of $9,500 to purchase the sculpture for their permanent art collection. The purchase has been approved by the St. Lucie County Cultural Affairs Council. FUNDS A V AIUBILITY: Funds will be made available from the Art in Public Places Trust Fund, 665-7310-563000-700 RECO MMENDA TI 0 N: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the purchase of the sculpture "A Sapling's Canopy" for the Art in Public Places Program's art inventory for an amount not to exceed $9,500 COMMISSION ACTION: [~APPROVED [I DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 :J- Do as M. Anderson County Administrator íksf County Attomey:~ _ Originating DePt~ Review and Approva1s rl d/l / Management & BudgetUtiL Purchasing: Other: Other: Finance:(check for copy only, if applicable) Concord, NC ~ "I was born, raised, and became a man along the shores of the Monongahela River, the river that flows north to the Steel City of Pittsburgh, PA. I watched industrial materials such as steel, lumber, and coal being shipped up and down the rivers and roadways, and I watched glass being made. And I did this without knowing that some day I would fall in love with such things. I am now combining my passion for nature with my need to work with industrial materials. The results have yielded large, organic forms that sing praises to the natural but are made from materials commonly used in skyscrapers - steel and glass. "A Sapling's Canopy is a piece that allows me to express my love of nature through the use of industrial materials. I built this sapling on a monumental scale to draw attention to the vein-work within the leaves. The design of the leaves is a result of combining aspects of foliage from three different species of trees: crape myrtle, red bud, and jack frost ligustrum. I am drawn to study the unique network of veins that each leaf possesses. Stained glass was chosen to represent the leaves because of its brilliant illumination under sunlight." - Jason E. Losko Canopy, 2001, Steel, stained 13 ft. x 12 ft. x 11 ft. Sapling's Canopy, ~, 3 AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. £':§A DATE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: DON MCLAM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CENTRAL SERVICES SUBJECT: Request to transfer equipment, an enclosed utility trailer, to Central Services Department, St. Lucie County property #303406 I Tag # 103611. BACKGROUND: SEE A TTACHED MEMORANDUM FUNDS AVAIL: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the request to transfer equipment, an enclosed utility trailer, to Central Services Department, St. Lucie County property #303406 I Tag # 103611. Approved 5-0 MISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Coordination/Signatures Dou / nderson County Administrator County Attorney: Originating ~ "-.. ~ - Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing Mgr.: cØr Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eft. 1/97 H:\AGENDA\AGENDA-129 REQUEST FOR UTILITY TRAILER.DOC ..... .... " MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL SERVICES TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: Don Mclam, Assistant Director DATE: May 16, 2006 SUBJECT: Request to transfer equipment, an enclosed utility trailer, to Central Services Department, St. Lucie County property #303406 / Tag # 103611. ****************************************************************************** BACKGROUND: The intended use of an enclosed utility trailer that is owned by St. Lucie County and stored at the County Compound located on Oleander Ave. was to assist with oil spill equipment and clean-up efforts. Staff is no longer responsible for this task and therefore the trailer is not in use and would be a valuable asset to our facility. Staff is requesting to transfer the enclosed utility trailer to Central Services Department. The St. Lucie County property number for the utility trailer is #303406 / tag #103611. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the request to transfer equipment, an enclosed utility trailer, to Central Services Department, St. Lucie County property #303406 / Tag # 103611. · .~ «; ~ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. c-6B DATE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT[x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: DON MCLAM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CENTRAL SERVICES SUBJECT: Temporary relocation of Inmates from Building B-4 to a vacant and alternate area located in Building D-2 enabling contractor, Sunrise System of Brevard, to do exterior work on Building B-4, and allow staff to perform necessary maintenance on interior of building while unoccupied, and approve reallocation of funds in the amount of $71, 600.00 from General Fund Contingency / Budget Amendment No. BA06-137for projected Sheriff's staffing cost, not exceed sixty-four (64) calendar days. BACKGROUND: SEE A TTACHED MEMORANDUM FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAIL: 001-1940-534000-100 (Other Contractual Services) PREVIOUS ACTION: On 12/20/2005, Item No. 4G, the Board approved entering into contract with Sunrise Systems of Brevard for removal of the EIFS System at the Woman's Dorm (B-4) and Medical Building, Rock Road Jail. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve temporary relocation of inmates from Building B-4 to Building D-2 enabling the contractor, Sunrise Systems of Brevard, to do exterior work on Building B-4, and allow staff to perform necessary maintenance on the interior of the building while it is unoccupied, and approve reallocation of funds in the amount of $71,600.00 from General Fund Contingency / Budget Amendment No. BA06-137 for projected Sheriff's staffing cost, not to exceed sixty-four (64) calendar days. MISSION ACTION: ~ ',APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 CE: ou nderson County Administrator County Attorney: Originating De~ ~ \"'\..~ Mgt. & Budget. Purchasing Mgr.: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eft. 1/97 H:\AGENDA\AGENDA-125 RELOCATE INMATES TEMP..DOC MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL SERVICES TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: Don Me Lam, Assistant Director DATE: May 16, 2006 SPBJECT: Temporary relocation of Inmates from Building B-4 to a vacant and alternate area located in Building D-2 enabling contractor, Sunrise System of Brevard, to do exterior work on Building B-4, and allow staff to perform necessary maintenance on interior of building while unoccupied, and approve reallocation of funds in the amount of $71, 600.00 from General Fund Contingency / Budget Amendment No. BA06-13 7 for proj ected Sheriff s staffing cost, not to exceed sixty-four (64) calendar days. ****************************************************************************** BACKGROUND: On Dec. 20, 2005, Item No. 4-G, the Board of County Commissioners approved St. Lucie County entering into contract with Sunrise Systems of Brevard for the removal of the EIFS System at the Woman's Dorm (Pod B-4) and Medical Building, Rock Road Jail. Inmates housed in Building B-4 also use the recreation area located on the outside perimeter of this building. In preparation of the work ahead, and before issuance of the "Notice to Proceed" (May 16th, 2006), staff is recommending to temporarily relocate these inmates to a vacant and alternate housing area located in Building D-2, (guaranteed completion of the contract is 45 days). Doing so will allow the contractor to freely access the entire exterior of the building, scheduled for the EIFS System removal, without compromising the overall security and safety of the facility residents. In addition, while Building B-4 is unoccupied, staff would be able to enter and perform necessary maintenance on the interior of the building. Sheriff staff currently used in Building B-4 would be moved over to Building D-2 with the exception of: additional security personnel required in the alternate housing. Total cost associated with this request is $71,599.53 (see attached letter from St. Lucie County Sheriffs Office) and funding in the amount of$71,600.00 is available in General Fund Contingency and staff is seeking approval to use these funds and approve Budget Amendment No. BA06-137 for projected Sheriffs staffing cost, not to exceed sixty-four (64) calendar days. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve temporary relocation of inmates from Building B-4 to Building D-2 enabling the contractor, Sunrise Systems of Brevard, to do exterior work on Building B-4, and allow staff to perform necessary maintenance on the interior ofthe building while it is unoccupied, and approve reallocation of funds in the amount of $71,600.00 from General Fund Contingency / Budget Amendment No. BA06-137 for projected Sheriffs staffing cost, not to exceed sixty-four calendar days. "ER/p " ~ §>lp~riff KENJ.MASCARA . = fI ~ >- ¡..., ~~ cO Member National Sheriffs' Association Member Florida Sheriffs' Association Telephone: (772) 461-7300 · Fax: (772) 489-5851 4700 West Midway Road, Fort Pierce, Florida 34981 May 2, 2006 ~fl0ß'nn ' ~. r--!d2=."l:J u W ~ ;. , /7 ¡ ~~ /7;) ow ¡ MAY - 4 2 /./ /1/1 L 'Dos ¡IV'I Cr: ""-, ¡.....J .....p"l'?r:¡¡ -;---~; l.-... f"-lL;t1Þ~: (:'t¡~~ ~- <">"""'~ir'.' '--:I';jr/ J¡,'~ ~ ... ¿'~"L:S Roger Shinn Director, St. Lucie CoUnty Central Services 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Re:. Renovation to Building B-4 De~nn 1~, On Monday, May 1, 2006 a pre-construction meeting was conducted, with members of tbe St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office and St. Lucie County, to formulate a 'Plan of Action' for the refurbishment of Building B-4. Many creative alternatives were offered and a combined decision was reached to relocate the residents of Building B-4 to a vacant, and alternate housing area located in Building D-2. We discussed, at length, the costs associated with these actions and collectively concluded that this alternative provided St. Lucie County the most efficient method to resolve all the construction, security and safety issues. In a spirit of cooperation and to assist your staff in the planI1ed renovation to building B- 4, located at the St. Lucie County jai~ the following security staffing pattern and alternate housing plan is recommended. These actions will allow the contractor of record full and unimpeded access to the exterior and interior 'of the building without compromising the safety of residents or the overall security and safety of the facility, residents or visitors. Additionally, thìs plan will allow members ofthe Central Services Division and the St. Lucie County Sheriff's to perform required and related preventative maintenance functions simultaneously, saving critical future county resources. The contractual agreement specifies the overall pt:'oject timeline is scheduled to commence on May16, 2006 and conclude forty-five (45) working days thereafter. It should be noted that tills is a total of sixty-four (64) calendar days, an important fact whenassessiIig housing staff requirements and costs. Adding ten percent (10%) management factor for 'rain days' or other emergent conditions, the total estimated timeline is seventy (70) days. The following are the projected staffing costs (factored at overtime rate) for the initial movement an alternative housing of these prisoners: 1. Initial secure movement of prisoners, equipment, etc., and secure movement of prisoners, equipment, etc. to B-4: $ 7,343.54 2. Additional security personnel required in alternate housing: $64,255.99 ------------------------------------- Total Staffing Costs $71,599.53 Because the contractual agreement dictates that the contractor of record will need access to the interior and exterior of the facility, two (2) security escorts are required. These escorts will be provided by the St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office negating additional costs to this project. It should also be noted that the staffing costs are factored at the overtime rate in order to provide the required security. If you have any questions or need additional infonnation, please feel ftee to contact me directly. Major F. patrick Tighe, Director Department of Detention St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office FPT/dw Cc: Garry R. Wilson, Chief Deputy Toby Long, Finance Director Captain Patricia Walsh Captain Jimmy York Clay Rigdon, Facility Manager file BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: Central Services PREPARED DATE: 5/9/2006 AGENDA DATE: 5/16/2006 TO: 001-1940-534000-100 Other Contractual Services $71,600 FROM: 001-9910-599100-800 Contin enc $71,600 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: Tem ora inmate relocation. CONTINGENCY BALANCE: THIS AMENDMENT: REMAINING BALANCE: $276,397 $71,600 $204,797 DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: BA06-137 FISCAL YEAR 2005-2006 FUNDS APPROVED FROM CONTINGENCY GENERAL FUND AMOUNT REMAINING: $339,597 ACCOUNT # DEPARTMENT ITEM 001-9910-599100-800 Approved Budget Contingency BA06-1 05 BA06-110 BA06-118 BA06-119 BA06-116 BA06-121 BA06-122 BA06-125 BA06-128 BA06-133 BA06-144 BA06-102 BA06-146 BA06-147 Proposed action: BA06-134 BA06-150 BA06-137 Environmental Planning Coordinator / Environ. Lands Lightning Warning System - Parks Database Roadway Concurrency-Rd & Bridge Building Rental for the Clerk of Court Employees To pay for the annual Fort Pierce CRA payment. Consultant to file appeal with FEMA Heathcote Expansion Project Additional litigation services Fencing & Landscaping Installation at the Compound Install fiber from Courthouse to Depot Building South Causeway Beach Road Stabilization/Clean-up GreenwayslTrails Master Plan Sewer Design Fairgrounds ADA Parking Lot Tradition Field (inter-fund loan) Total used: Balance Available St. James Sidewalk/Ave J Pedestrian Bridge Architectural Services for PSL Yacht Club Temporary inmate relocation Balance Available After Proposed Action: AMOUNT $1,000,000 $69,139 $53,896 $113,000 $65,040 $90,874 $5,400 $15,000 $45,000 $10,500 $4,148 $60,000 $70,000 $22,550 $35,856 $660,403 $339,597 $55,000 $8,200 $71,600 $204,797 ---r ~... AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. c-7 DATE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: DON MCLAM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CENTRAL SERVICES SUBJECT: Reallocate remaining IFF Funds in the amount of $243,000.00 from funds budgeted FY 05-06 to replace the roof on the Administration Annex. The roof replacement project was completed under budget. BACKGROUND: SEE ATTACHED MEMORANDUM FUNDS AVAIL: 316-1931-546200-1526 (Administration Annex/Maintenance Improvements Projects) PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the reallocation of IFF Funds in the amount of $243,000.00 from funds budgeted FY 05-06 to replace the roof on the Administration Annex and was completed under budget. These funds will be used on the following project locations: $20,000-Administration Annex/new flooring, $10,000-South County Annex/purchase gazebo, $92,000- Central Services/construction of new building, $16,000-Rock Road Jail/sally port doors, $20,000.00-Rock Road Jail/Electrical Engineering Services, $65,000-Rock Road Jail Maintenance Division, and $20,000-Hayslip Data Treatment Center/renovation of restrooms. MISSION ACTION: [)( APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 Dou Änderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & BUdget-ÏlJ'V Nvf\A&-; Other: Purchasing Mgr.: County Attorney: Originating D~!\V.,.q... Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eff, 1/97 H:\AGENDA\AGENDA-130 REALLOCATE IFF FUNDS FROM ADMIN ANNEX ROOF.DOC ~> ... . . MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL SERVICES TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: Don McLam, Assistant Director DATE: May 16, 2006 SUBJECT: Reallocate remaining IFF Funds in the amount of$243,000.00 from funds budgeted FY 05-06 to replace the roof on the Administration Annex. The roof replacement project was completed under budget. ****************************************************************************** BACKGROUND: IFF Funds in the amount of $450,000.00 were budgeted for roof replacement on the Administration Annex and this project was completed under budget. Central Services has several projects and with the assistance of these remaining funds, will be accomplished. Staff is requesting to reallocate remaining IFF Funds in the amount of$243,000.00 from the Administration Annex roof proj ect to the following projects: . $20,OOO.OO-Installation of new congoleum flooring in the Administration Annex. Due to a high volume of use the flooring in the third floor Commission area, the common areas and 3rd floor conference room, is in need of replacement. Also, in Human Resources the common area and file room flooring will be replaced with congoleum flooring. . $10,OOO.OO-Purchase and install a gazebo for the South County Annex. This has been requested by the Clerk's Office and will be utilized by residents' that use the Clerk's Office for marriage services. . $92,OOO.OO-Construction of a new building. After Hurricane Frances all of Central Services staff was relocated into temporary trailers, this included the Construction & Renovation Division. Central Services Administration staff have moved back into their building, however the Construction & Renovation Division are still in a trailer. This new building will provide a break room, restroom and storage area for them. . $16,OOO.OO-Installation of sally port doors at Rock Road Jail. The existing sally port does not allow for adequate ventilation to the area. To address this problem, staff received an estimated cost from an Engineer to install a ventilation system. When comparing costs of purchasing new sally port doors and installing a ventilation system, it is more cost effective to install sally port doors that are manufactured to allow for ventilation. Page J of2 .. .-- · $20,OOO.OO-Engineering Services for the domestic water system at Rock Road Jail. We have had to address ongoing issues of maintenance with the original domestic water system at this facility. Because this is the original system, efficiency of it comes into question. An engineering firm will provide staff with a complete evaluation ofthis existing water supply system concerning its value. · $65,OO.OO-Rock Road Jail Maintenance. Due to increased maintenance projects at this facility, Central Services Jail Maintenance Division has depleted their building maintenance funds. Additional funding is needed to continue with maintenance of the jail. · $20,OOO.OO-Renovation of restrooms at the Hayslip Data Treatment Center. The restrooms at this facility are in dire need of renovation; they are in very poor condition and need to be brought up to compliance with ADA standards. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the reallocation of IFF Funds in the amount of$243,000.00 from funds budgeted FY 05-06 to replace the roof on the Administration Annex and was completed under budget. These funds will be used on the following project locations: $20,000-Administration Annex/new flooring, $10,OOO-South County Annex/purchase gazebo, $92,000- Central Services/construction of new building, $16,000-Rock Road Jail/sally port doors, $20,OOO.00-Rock Road JaillElectrical Engineering Services, $65,OOO-Rock Road Jail Maintenance Division, and $20,000-Hayslip Data Treatment Center/renovation of restrooms. i: ' . . Page 2 of2 ... ~ \\ER/¡: " ~ c py ~11-er¡ff KEN J. MASCARA . . rII ,;. >- J... ~~ cO Member National Sheriffs' Association Member Florida Sheriffs' Association Telephone: (772) 461-7300· Fax: (772) 489-5851 4700 West Midway Road, Fort Pierce, Florida 34981 Apri13,2006 Mike Shine S1. Lucie County Central Services 900 N. Rock Road Fort Pierce, FL 34945 Dear Mr. Shine: The replacement of the sallyport doors at the jail are needed in order to provide additional ventilation. Please accept this letter as my authorization to go ahead with the replacement of these doors as we discussed. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at (772) 462-3283. Sincerely, OilÞ{ fJl1~ Clay Rigdon Facilities Manager St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office dw Cc: Major F. Patrick Tighe, Director of Detention Roger Shinn, Central Services Director AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ITEM NO. C-S DATE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XXX] PRESENTED BY: Carl Holeva Human Resources Director SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT SUBJECT: Reimbursement rates for meals and mileage. BACKGROUND: Florida Statutes Section 112.061 has been amended by Section 112.061, Section 2, Chapter 2005-125 to authorize the governing body of a county to establish travel reimbursement rates that exceed those rates set forth in Section 112.061. FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds are available in department budgets. PREVIOUS ACTION: Resolution # 05-057 dated Feb. S, 2005. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution #06-175 with an effective date of May 16, 2006. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: PI APPROVED [ ] DENIED Approved 5-0 [ ] OTHER Douglas nderson ~i County Administrator Review and A rov Is County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. .:;1/ .#'.A-' Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 AGENDA TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: Carl Ho1eva, Human Resources Director DATE: May 16, 2006 SUBJECT: Reimbursement rates for meals and mileage BACKGROUND: The County established travel reimbursement rates per Resolution number 05-057 dated Feb. 8. 2005. Resolution No. 06-175 (attached) establishes the following rates for reimbursement of travel expenses for public officers, employees and authorized persons effective May 16, 2006. Breakfast Lunch Dinner Mileage $ 6.00 to $ 6.00 (remains the same) $ 9.00 to $11.00 $15.00 to $19.00 $ .32 to 44.5 cents per mile RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution No. 06-175 for meals and travel reimbursement as per section 112.061 Florida Statutes. Respectfully submitted, ~~~ Carl Holeva Human Resources Director cHimp Attachments RESOLUTION NO. 06-175 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY AMENDING AND RESTATING RESOLUTION NO. 05-057 ESTABLISHING TRAVEL REIMBURSEMENT RATES FOR MEALS AND MILEAGE; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners has made the following determinations: 1. Section 112.061, Florida Statutes, establishes per diem and travel expenses reimbursement rates for public officers, employees and authorized persons. 2. Section 2, Chapter 2002-125, Laws of Florida, amended Section 112.061, Florida Statutes, to authorize the governing body of a county to establish travel reimbursement rates that exceed those rates set forth in Section 112.061. 3. The 2006 Florida Legislature passed Senate Bill 428, which increased the travel expense reimbursement for public employee. 4. This Board has determined that it is necessary and in the best interest of the County to provide for an increase in the reimbursement rates for meals and mileage to be consistent with the rates in Senate Bill 428. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, as follows: A. As used herein, "County traveler" shall mean officers and employees of the Board of County Commissioners, St. Lucie County, Florida, and shall also include authorized travel by: 1. A person other than a public officer or employee who is authorized by the County Administrator or his designee to incur travel expenses in the performance of official duties for St. Lucie County. 2. A person called upon by the County to contribute time and services as a consultant or advisor, whether retained or as a volunteer. 3. A person who is a candidate for an executive or professional position for whom reimbursement is prior approved by the County Administrator. B. County travelers shall be allowed the following amounts for subsistence while on Closs C out-of-town travel on official business as provided in Section 112.061(5)(b), Florida Statutes: 1. Breakfast $6.00 2. Lunch $9.00 $11.00 3. Dinner $15.00$19.00 C. When authorized to travel by privately owned vehicle for or in connection with County business, a County traveler shall be entitled to a mileage allowance at a fixed rate of thirty two ($.32) forty-four and 1/2 cents ($.445) per mile. D. Nothing provided in this resolution is intended to establish any authority for travel by any person. The purpose of this resolution is to provide for the rates established herein for those who are otherwise authorized to travel at the expense of the County. E. The rates provided herein shall take effect on F~bruor'f 8, 2005 May 16. 2006. and shall apply to all authorized travel on or after that date, including travel by a consultant or advisor who is currently under contract where such contract authorizes travel reimbursement at the rates provided in Section 112.061, Florida Statutes. After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Doug Coward XXX Vice Chairman Chris Craft XXX Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX Commissioner Joseph E. Smith XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 16th day of May, 2006. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY , AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-9a DATE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: Board of County Commissioners )ody ~ SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Community Services SUB1ECT: Authorize staff to submit a grant application to the Florida Department of Transportation Transit Corridor grant program to implement transit service connecting St. Lucie County and Indian River County. BACKGROUND: The FDOT Transit Corridor program is a 100% funded grant program that encourages regional cooperation with multiple jurisdictions. The U.S. 1 fixed route has been funded through the Transit Corridor program. To better meet the transit needs of north county residents and Treasure Coast residents looking to travel to work in any of the three counties, this proposal will cover the capital and operating cost of the cross· county project. If funded, a Subgrant Agreement between the County and Council on Aging will need to be approved allowing the Council on Aging to implement the project. FUNDS AVAILABLE: No match is required. PREVIOUS ACTION: The Transit Development Plan identifies the need for this project. RECOMMENDATION: Authorize staff to submit a grant application to the Florida Department of Transportation Transit Corridor grant program to implement transit service connecting St. Lucie County and Indian River County. Review and Appro\ß315 County Attorney: )J( Originating Dept: Finance: _~C CONCURREN~: /£ Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator Management & Budget: f. -+0 /)lIl)tlurchaSing: _ Other: Other: _ ~Check for Copy only, if applicable) Effective: 5/96 COMMISSION ACTION: ¥J APPROVED [] OTHER: [] DENIED Approved 5-0 ,. Florida Department of Transportation 2006/2007 Fiscal Year Public Transit Corridor Program ST. LUCIE / INDIAN RIVER COUNTIES CONNECTION Recipient Name: St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Proiect Tvpe: Capital, operation and marketing funds for the first fixed route connection between S1. Lucie and Indian River counties to facilitate travel needs of the transportation disadvantaged citizens of St. Lucie and Indian River counties. Maximum Duration: Three Years Proiect Location: The attached map identifies the two terminus locations both are transfer points in St. Lucie County and Indian River County. The specific stops will be determined through a public hearing process. Proiect Initiation/Completion Dates: Target Date Description July 2006 Develop Marketing,Plan Order Vehicles Refine Operations Plan Host 'Public Meeting Prepare Route Map and Schedule Establish Technical Advisory Committee Establish ADA Plan November 2006 Submit Route Map and Schedule for Printing Conduct Public Hearing Process Establish Performance Measures December 2006 Accept Delivery of Vehicles Paint Vehicles Hire Drivers Train Drivers Initiate Marketing Plan January 2007 Implement operation of fixed route July 2007 Evaluate System Refine System January 2008 Continue to evaluate System Refine System Market System Every 6 months Continue to evaluate and refine system Project Description: To design and implement a regional fixed route extending and connecting to the current US 1 Corridor system and continuing north to connect with Indian River Transit's system. Since the initial Transit Corridor grant allowed the implementation of the first fixed route between St. Lucie and Martin counties, this expanded system will allow transportation disadvantaged citizens opportunities to reach destinations throughout Indian River, St. Lucie and Martin Counties. The proposed route will begin at the St. Lucie County transfer location at A venue D and ih Street in Ft. Pierce that provides connection to three routes in this county. The northern terminus will connect with two routes at the Indian River County Oslo Plaza at 27th Avenue and 9th Street SW (Oslo Road). The Indian River County transfer location will provide riders to travel tö the Indian River Mall, businesses along U.S. 1 or connect with additional routes to the north. Although the public meeting and public hearing will determine the location of the exact stops, the route could stop at commercial locations on U.S. 1, the airport industrial park, the stores and community areas in Lakewood Park. The project will assist in reducing congestion along U.S. 1 within the City ofFt. Pierce. Since most of the development in northern St. Lucie County and southern Indian River County is located apprqximately ten miles west of U.S. 1, all of the commuting traffic travels on two two-lane, north-south roads. The proposed route should reduce congestion along these roads including 2th Avenue by capturing choice riders as well as the transportation disadvantaged. Proiect Goals and Objectives: The primary goals of this regional project are: · Coordinate the timing of bus service and county line transfers to increase the accessibility and efficiency of the three county transit system. · Coordinate the marketing plan and bus stops to enhance image in all three counties. · Capture the choice rider. · Implement a regional project identified in the updated Transit Development Plan. Criteria and/or Objectives bv which to Measure Proiect Success: Project success will be determined by the increase in ridership on this route as well as the other three fixed routes. In addition, increase of the diversity of riders in relation to age, race and socioeconomic characteristics thus showing that the overall system also attracts the "choice riders". Pro iect Budget: Item Total Project Cost Requested Funds Capital $225,000 Operating 500,000 Marketing 100,000 Year One Grand Total Year Two Year Three $225,000 First Year Only 500,000 100,000 $825,000 $600,000 $600,000 Benefits to Other Transit Systems: The primary benefit of the proposed project is to increase accessibility and efficiency for the transit users within three counties. This link would allow access to three existing fixed routes in S1. Lucie County and six routes in Indian River County. The routes provide access to colleges, shopping, hospitals and employment in Martin, S1. Lucie and Indian River counties. By providing a dependable fixed route in this underserved area, the transportation disadvantaged will not have to depend on the limited flexibility of the demand response services. By increasing ridership on the fixed routes, it may ultimately decrease ridership on the demand response which should reduce the overall cost of providing transit in this region. The project will also increase the coordination of regional projects between the three counties because it will now provide a transit connection for the Treasure Coast region. Operational Responsibilities: The operations will be perfonned.by Council on Aging of St. Lucie, Inc. (COASL) The fixed route system outlined in the map has a duration of three (3) hours round trip. To maintain one hour headway, three buses running simultaneously would be require to operate the system. COASL anticipates fifteen (15) stops, capturing residential, employment, education, recreational and shopping. Continuation of Project: S1. Lucie County and the municipalities adopted a Municipal Services Taxing Unit (MSTU) that provides a dedicated funding source for transit for the continuation of this project beyond grant duration. This project can be advanced in the work program, if current year state funding becomes available. From: To: Date: Subject: "Marianne Arbore" <marbore@coasl.com> "Jody Bonet" <bonetj@stlucieco.gov> 6/13/2005 9:57:06 AM Fw: St. Lucie County/Indian River County Connector Endorsement Letter Here is the endorsement letter to the application for the Service Development grant for the connection to Indian River County. This application is due Wednesday to FOOT. Please advise if you need anything else from-me. ----- Original Message ----- From: Karen Wood To: Marianne Arbore Sent: Monday, June 13, 2005 9:35 AM Subject: St. Lucie County/Indian River County Connector Endorsement Letter June 13th, 2005 To All Parties Concerned, Please be advised that Indian River County Council on Aging and India River County MPO will endorse the County to County connection of Indian River Transit and St. Lucie County Transport at Oslo Plaza (27th Ave & 9th St S. W,). Indian River County is in agreement it will cause less confusion if St. Lucie County applies for this grant alone and operates the connector into Indian River County at Oslo Plaza to meet exsisting routes. Indian River Transit has two existing routes meeting at Oslo Plaza Monday thru Friday, route 6 goes to South Vero Plaza (US 1 & 9th St S. W.) connecting with route 4 while route 7 travels to Indian River Mall connecting with route 2. Indian River County believes this service would be extremely beneficial to customers in both counties as no County to County transfers exist at this time. Indian River County f\i1PO and Indian River County Council on Aging, Inc. fully endorses this service and would like to thank all parties involved for the consideration. Karen Wood Transportation Director Indian River County Council on Aging, Inc. cc: "Darrell Drummond" <ddrummond@coasl.com> ~ r AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-9b DATE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: Board of County Commissioners SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Community Services 4Jv ssistant Director SUBJECT: Request for Board approval to apply for the third year of funding from the FDOT Service Development grant for the East-West Transit Routes. BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County Community Services received the second year of funding from the Florida Department of Transportation for the operation and marketing of the east-west transit routes in Ft. Pierce in June 2005. This will be the last year that the County can request funding for the two east west Connector routes. The $ 112,000 grant will be matched with $112,000 from the SLC Public Transit MSTU. FUNDS AVAILABLE: A 50% ($112,000) match is required and will come from the SLC Public Transit MSTU Account 130-4910-582015-400. PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board accepted the first grant for this project on November 23, 2004 and the second in June, 2005. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize staff to submit a grant application to FDOT Service Development program for operation of the two existing east west routes. COMMISSION ACTION: E: it~PPROVED Õ OTHER: Review and A rev County Attorney: Originating Dept: Finance: _X_ Doug s M. Anderson County Administrator Management & Budget: (<-Øltl/l ~urchasing: _ Other: Other: _ ---r Check for Copy only, if applicable) Effective: 5/96 Approved 5-0 [] DENIED ,.",.", , COMMUNITY SERVICES MEMORANDUM #06-115 TO: Board of County Commissioners Jody Bonet, Assistant Director ißr Service Development Grant for East - West Routes May 10, 2006 FROM: SUBJECT: DATE: The ribbon cutting event for the two east west Treasure Coast Connector routes occurred on February 4,2005. The operation costs for the two east west routes are funded through a Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Service Development grant and the transit MSTU. The Service Development grants can assist with three years of funding and require a 50% match. The Board accepted the first grant from FDOT in November, 2004 and the second grant in June, 2005. The grants are for $112,400 and $112,000 and this request will also be for $112,000. The buses have been purchased with funds from the Federal Transit Administration. After these operation grants are expended, the Transit MSTU will cover the full operation cost of these two routes. The number of passengers continues to rise and primarily benefit students going to Indian River Community College, residents seeking medical assistance and to access employment at the local commercial plazas. Staff Recommendation Authorize staff to submit a grant application for $112,000 to Florida Department of Transportation Service Development for operation costs for the east west routes. 1r AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-9c DATE: May 16, 2006 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: Board of County Commissioners SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Community Services ßt~ SUBJECT: Approve the first amendment to the artist's contract as prepared by the County Attorney for the transit art bench project. BACKGROUND: On July 13,2004, the BOCC authorized staff to purchase concrete benches and hire an artist to develop beautiful transit art benches. The project is 50% funded from an Urban Transit grant from FDOT and the match comes from the Community Pride account and an account that was set up for benches and shelters in 2004. The first amendment to the contract will allow for the artist to complete the last twenty five benches by the end of June 2006. Funds are available in the account listed below. FUNDS AVAILABLE: The total bench project is funded from the following accounts: FDOT Urban Transit grant account # 001289-4910-582015-6954, Community Pride account #316- 6420-563000-6954 Transit bench / shelter account # 001-4910-582015-400. PREVIOUS ACTION: On July 13, 2004, the BOCC approved the development of the transit art benches with funds coming from the accounts listed above. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the first amendment to the artist's contract for the development of the mosaic art benches. COMMISSION ACTION: fSAPPROVED [] OTHER: [] DENIED Approved 5-0 Douglas . Anderson County Administrator Review and Approv~s ., County Attorney: iV? Management & Budget: f..::{OVr1J l~urChaSing:_ Originating Dept: Other: Other: Finance: _2L ~Check for Copy only, if applicable) Effective: 5/96 /.".. , COMMUNITY SERVICES MEMORANDUM #06-115 TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Jody Bonet, Assistant Director ~ Transit Art Benches May 10, 2006 SUBJECT: DATE: On October 21,2003 the Board of County Commissioners directed staff to investigate non-advertised options for benches that could be used along the transit route and in other areas of the county. To meet hurricane wind requirements, staff recommended the use of concrete benches that could weigh as much 1300 lbs. Although painted art benches are used in other areas of the country, the BOCC approve the use of mosaic tile benches on July 13,2004. Fifty concrete benches were purchased and since they were such a successful form of functional public art, an additional fifty benches were purchased. Since there are over one hundred stops on the four fixed routes and there will be the addition of the Fort Pierce trolley, there are plenty oflocations for the benches. The first fifty benches had designs produced by the local community which added extra time for many departments since a specialist agreement had to be processed for each design. In the second set of fifty benches, the design cost was added into the total budget for the artist. For that reason, staff requests an amendment to the artist agreement. The first agreement for the first 50 was for $24,990 in addition to the costs associated with the individual designs by the other artists. The second set of fifty was divided up in two sections due to the uncertainty of having a site to work on the benches. Thus, the agreement for the first twenty-five set was $17,000. This amendment will be for the second twenty-five and will also be for $17,000. Included in this price is the design costs and covering of an assistant so the products can be produced by the Civic Center tear down date. The agreement will run until June 30,2006 to ensure that everything is completed even if they have to finish sealing and painting the grout lines out under the trees. It is hoped to have the benches done by June 1 and moved out with the assistance of the two cities and county staff to the bus stop locations. Staff Recommendation Staff recommends that the Board approve the amendment to the artist's agreement as prepared by the County Attorney's office.