The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About01-15-2004 Reserve/PGA Village . ~ ~ )s)¿i f . 'Jt';~r: ~~:~~J;1::1~:7í~~~';;:~?~~/,~ :-:~i; .\::"; : ~< .~.{ ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ,. ,,1}~~~W'~&'~~ð;¡,\íi:¡,,;,¡:Jí'~;~;["': 'f: - -'~ j.' ..-; ',! RESERVE/PGA VILLAGE TRANSPORTATION ISSUES (' /. WORKSHOP AGENDA !(J1{~í Î)Y~./~~.. JANUARY 15,2004 ~ t'" r' iJ. ,/ Vf\ 1 :30 P.M. [)./ fJ {I r r 'tONFERENCE ROOM #3 If ð~ ¡Av¡(fr-' J-J J t:-- L--?c ~ ú~~ /lø~ ;- r&' ~ Call to order/Commissioner Paula Lewis, Chairman, Board of County ¿--vi J/ JI Commissioners ~ J Introductions/Commissioner Paula Lewis, Chairman, Board of Cou~ h ...þ-t-- Commissioners ß / }< (:- Review the general development status of the PGA/Reserve DRI (~ a. Review the status of the existing Development Order for the '/1 \ ~ ( PGA/Reserve DRI r Î-J 1 )J ¡) b. Discuss the two internal roadway connections proposed between th~. !.J} PGA Village DRI and the PGAlReserve DR!. t / /J~ c. Discuss possible options for internal roadway connections. J V ;:= · Potential impact of options on the County's 911 Emergen¥ /" Response System /" t IV' L-) ijM ~ 1. 2. 3. 4. Board Discussion 5. Summary 6. Adjourn NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be swom In. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (772) 462·1777 or TDD (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting ...- ...::;:';;;::-~ -r '.<.::.:"\! _'_'0,. , '''~'''\ \ I J: /., ,/' /"\ ¡ .,~~~>:: "- ,I' J i/,: ~ [·-..t.....} 1_·" \\". .~.-r' :V' "I " , ~...... \. \', ( ( \_ ..-- --I. .....-..~~- -··---ì ¡! ¡J ) \. ' V \ ¡ '-ì !' ... "" '\ .. . \ i II \ -'>.:~.::::--~ \ _----+- ". I , l. ; '. \ .'.;/ ~\ \ ':- '-- - \ \ ' ¡- '. '\ 1 \ .. \ !.. \, 1/ " . \ ..... -~~'. 1"1 \\ ." <.> \ - ..---=-------/ \ \ I' .;:-.' '\,-( --~ t· \ I __~i \. ,,-<-:., ,j ::::.~._..,_.--,-'-~~~-::- _\,~:~,-, L.)/:::='-;:;:-' '. .,..._____.) )\-. .-: r-'-/ .' ..:.::-..--.:::.-.-__ c~·J~:::-.:.:y;;;,:.:;:,...)·...../·.../ ~.-...... -~...,¡::;..-'-'-.."..~ ~. ...~\~ð ...-/ --'-.. --- ~~.~/ ..---"'~:..¡:'::~~\\ // ~"\ 1/1 ¡ '.~~~~7 '-.'ó /! ¡ ):! ~--Ji¡ :......--... ¡' L! .c':\-:-> 1\/\ .". ~'~, ...-..~.. \. \\ }f /__..~ ........\ \\ , '. \ :! .I I I j /1 ;~~~~!t§~Y/~\, .'/ /:./" //'_..-,,;~;:;. , :.;;.:~~./ , ~ ~ ~] ~ -.: ~ . '§¡;e:~ tl] ~ ~" ~i ~ " l~ ~ l:-':';::!:IQOo:~~:>(~ iJ :J i~~î Ht5" ~ ta ~ ij ~ Ii l l £1 II ì~ ll~ ~ . ~ D;<II ~ ...~ ~ []IDLJIIDD5HJ f;;J iJ,V19~INI .,.-.~ .- - .> .",.-. /' (..,~J ~ t ~~ ~ëS (1) ~ " it ït Hi ~li ã ;¡¡ !-~ j it ¡I~ .ò~ ~ ~ 0" ~? o d'c» ;ö~ ~ ..-. .-p.. -.-. ~- C2 .. ~ I ~e:1! ~å;'Q, ~ ~~.~ 'ë! 1J~'2 ç:~~!:: ~l~f ~~~ .!S3 i ~ ~&]~ - ~ þ§ e~~E::~ "_.~ ~ > "'"'t ~ <]~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (Is-aM i!Jpn7 'IS) C. c..; ~ i!Jpn1 ·IS µod JO Á1D ~ t ø~ : I I , <JApä':iJl¡ja::r~à,~~ -"'ÖJ- '- ,...:¡ < ~ ~ E-t Z U) H>-<p,:j <0 Ç,:~E-t ~~u U)<~ ooz p..,p,:jz o 0 p,:j u p.., (". \ :::r' \\ \\ ~ , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Randy Stevenson, Assistant Community Development Director DATE: Friday, Janua~09, 2004 SUBJECT: Reserve (a/kla PGAlReserve) Transportation Workshop On January 15, 2004 you will be asked to review the status of the existing Development Order and the general development status of the Development of Regional Impact known as the Reserve (a/kla PGAI Reserve) at a public workshop, The primary element of this workshop will be the transportation infrastructure within this development. If the Board of County Commissioners deem necessary as a result of this workshop, they may schedule a public hearing for a date certain, A copy of the Notice of Workshop as distributed to all property owners within the Reserve and as published in the Tribune and The News on Janua~ 10, 2004, is attached, If you have any questions, please let us know. andy v nson, ASLA- Assistant Community Development Director .-k:~?( t'2 ~:¿¿"J./ I ~7- eLf- --::/úAc.¿~ 1-/0. é7V' ~"~~~ --q"·....~~~~~n,~u BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ~ T. ~ eJ e IE' ",.' ',-: COUNT"Y"", ~', .,",..", h ~ ~,~ ,.,. ~~ '. . _.'". . ~ r.,.; J: L, ,O,,!,¡'R" '·L-,p A..· ...,,"'.....,~. .-,- ,", " < ," . ,,1...,_ . .'._ ..'_,_, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR <.1I!1i-'.-:IIilI__;/J¡¡¡~W'~,' NOTICE OF WORKSHOP NOTICE is hereby given that on January 15, 2004, at 1 :30 PM, in Conference Room #3 of the St. Lucie County Administration Building Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida, a workshop will be held by the Board of County Commissioners for the purpose of reviewing the status of the existing Development Order and the general development status of the Development of Regional Impact known as the Reserve (aIk/a PGA Reserve). The proceedings of the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings. For such purpose, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. If it becomes necessary, a public hearing may be continued to a date- certain. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting at (772) 462-1777 or T.D.D. (772) 462-1428. If you no longer own property adjacent to the above-described parcel, please forward this notice to the new owner. Sincerely, ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Paula Lewis Chairman Publish date: January 10, 2004 JOHN D. ßRUHN. District NO.1· DOUG COWAP.D, DiSTrict NO.2· PAULA A. LEWIS, District No. J . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON. District NO.4. CLIFF ßAP.NES, District NO.5 County Administrator.. Douglos M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue · Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Administration: (772) 462-1590 · Plonning: (772) 462-2822 · GISlTechnical Services: (772) 462-1553 Economic Development: (772) 462-1550 · Fax: (772) 462-1581 Tourist/Convention: (772) 462-1529 · Fox: (772) 462-2132 www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us ¡ COMMISSION REVIEW: January 15, 2004 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Community Development Director DATE: January 12, 2004 SUBJECT: PGA Reserve/ Development of Regional Impact - Development Order Review The Board of County Commissioners has asked that summary update as to the status of the Development Order for the Reserve (a/k/a PGA Reserve), a Development of Regional Impact. For your review, I have attached a copy of Resolution 98-1 DO, which is the most up to date version of the Final Development Order affecting this project. The Table below summarizes the status of each of the conditions in this Resolution. Condition Number Status Comments 1 This is a recitation of facts related to the development review of this project. 2 This condition sets "must start by" and "must be complete by" dates, 3 Onaoina 4 Onaoina 5 Completed 6 Onaoina 7a Onaoina 7b Ongoing 7c Not Yet Applicable The triaaer conditions have not vet been reached. 8 Completed 9 Completed 10 Onaoina 11 Onaoina 12 Onaoina January 12, 2004 Page 2 Condition Status Number 13 Ongoing 14 Completed 15 Ongoing 16 Onaoing 17 Ongoing 17a Ongoing 18 Ongoing 19 Onaoing 20 Ongoing 21 Ongoing 22 Ongoing 23 Completed 24 Ongoina 25 Onaoina 26 Ongoing 27 Completed 28 Ongoina 29 Onaoina 30 Onaoina 31 Onaoina 32 Onaoina 33 Ongoing 34 Ongoing 35 Completed 36 Ongoing 37 Ongoing Subject: PGA Reserve/ Development of Regional Impact - Development Order Review - Comments The developers have provided a plan/map that indicates the location of the required 490 acres. It ap,p.ear.s that this condition is being complied with, Final review by the County's Environmental Resource Division of all documents is underway, Final determination of compliance/ noncompliance is forthcomina j January 12, 2004 Page 3 Subject: PGA Reserve/ Development of Regional Impact - Development Order Review - Condition Number Status Comments 38 Onaoina 39 Onaoina 40 Onaoina 41 Onaoina 42 Onaoina 43 Completed 42 Onaoina 43 Onaoina 46 Not yet completed The developers are proposing to amend this condition to eliminate the number of parcels (the gross acreage remains the same) and to provide seed money (or improvements) to the Homeowners Association. 47 Partially Satisfied The developers did submit a report several years ago that addressed this condition. However, the developers are now seeking to eliminate this condition since a similar condition was just dropped out of the St. Lucie West Development Order and the root need for this condition has chanaed over time. 48 Onaoina 49 Ongoing The developers are proposing to amend this condition to eliminate the dedication requirement since the Fire Department has not requested any sites from the fire department. The balance of this condition needs to be amended to reflect the effect of the County's adopted impact fees. 50 Onaoina - 51 Onaoina 52 Partially Satisfied Final alignments for the extension of Prima Vista Boulevard (a/k/a St. Lucie West Boulevard) were approved as part of the revised Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plans approved by the Board in the mid 1990's. Conveyance of the right-of-way south of the immediate extension of Prima Vista Boulevard, west of 1-95 is to be done as part of the final plat processing for PUD III at the Reserve. 53 Partially Satisfied Final alignments for the extension of Prima Vista Boulevard (a/k/a St. Lucie West Boulevard) were approved as part of the revised Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plans approved by the Board in the mid 1990's. Conveyance of the right-of-way south of the immediate extension of Prima Vista Boulevard, west January 12, 2004 Page 4 Subject: PGA Reserve/ Development of Regional Impact - Development Order Review - Condition Number Status Comments of 1-95 is to be done as part of the final plat processing for PUD III at the Reserve. 53a Ongoing The developers are proposing to amend this condition to change the land use matrix tables, 53b Completed 54 Completed 55a Completed The developers of the Reserve have posted the required security to provide for the cited improvements. Initial contributions from the developer were used to provide for interim signal improvements previously completed at this intersection, Additional lane improvements have been folded into the general reconstruction of this intersection now underwav. 55b Completed The developers of the Reserve have posted the required security to provide for the cited improvements. Initial contributions from the developer were used to provide for interim signal improvements previously completed at this intersection, Additional lane improvements have been folded into the general reconstruction of this intersection now underwav. 55c OnQoinQ 56 Completed 57 Not Yet Applicable The trigger conditions have not yet been reached in non- residential development (industrial park) 58 Not Yet Applicable The trigger conditions have not yet been reached in non- residential development (industrial park) 59a Not Yet Applicable The triQQer condition has not vet been reached for all cateQories. 59b Completed The trigger conditicm1Tas not yet been reached for all categories; however, the required improvements have been completed, by others. 60a Partially The trigger condition has not yet been reached for all categories; Completed however, the required improvements to Peacock Blvd, have been completed, by others. Improvements to Prima Vista Blvd (aJkJA St. Lucie West Blvd.) Have been partially completed - missinQ the third throuah lanes cited in this condition. 60b Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all cateQories, 61 (A) Not Yet ADDlicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all categories, 62 Not Yet ADDlicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all categories, January 12, 2004 Page 5 Subject: PGA Reserve/ Development of Regional Impact - Development Order Review - Condition Number Status Comments 63(A) Not Yet Applicable The trigger condition has not yet been reached for all categories; however, there is insufficient row to meet all lane reauirements. 63(B1 Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all categories. 63(C-) Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all categories. 63(OY-- Not Yet Applicable The trigger condition has not yet been reached for all categories however; the required improvements are being completed, by others. 64 Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all cateaories. 65 Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all cateaories, 66A Completed Intersection design has been modified from a traditional four- point intersection, to a traffic rotary that meets the same improvement obliaations. 66B Ongoing Signal warrants have not been meet for paragraphs (a) and (b). Signal warrants have been meet for paragraph (d) and are pending for paragraph (c). Developer is seeking final permits for signal at S6 off-ramp. Interim signal improvements are scheduled to be in place bv late Februarv 2004. 67 Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all cateaories. 68 Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all categories. 69(A) Not Yet Applicable The trigger condition has not yet been reached for all categories. Intersection design has been modified from a traditional four- point intersection, to a traffic rotary that meets the same improvement obligations. The required works have been completed bvothers. 69(B) Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all cateaories, 69(C) Not Yet Applicable The trigger condition has not vet been reached for all cateaories. 69(0) Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all cateaories. 69lE) Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all cateaories. 69(F) Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all cateaories. 69(G) Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all cateaories. 69(H) Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all categories. 70 Ongoing 71 Ongoina 72 Completed The reauired imcrovements have been completed, bv others. January 12, 2004 Page 6 Subject: PGA Reserve/ Development of Regional Impact - Development Order Review - Condition Number Status Comments 73 Comoleted The reauired imorovements have been comoleted, bv others. 74 Com Dieted The reauired imorovements have been com Dieted, bv others. 75 Onaoina 76 Onaoina 77 Onaoina 78 Ongoing With the recent addition of the PGA Villages DRI, located in the City of Port St. Lucie, there are two internal street connections that will be provided as part of the development of the parcels south of the existing PGA Reserve. These internal street connections are shown in the attached Figure 1 (Map H of the PGA Villages DRI). These internal street connections are consistent with the basic design and traffic circulation requirements set out in the County's Land Development Regulations and Comprehensive Plan (specifically Policies 1,1.8,1 and 1.1,8.2), Attached is a copy of a memo sent to you in November that addresses the traffic impacts of the proposed middle connection (Saddlebrook Drive), If after reviewing this information, the Board would like additional detail on any item outlined above, please let me know. SUBMITTED: Dennis J. Murphy, AICP Community Development Director DJM RESERV18(H) cc: County Administrator Asst. County Admin, County Attorney Asst. Community Dev, Director Public Works Director County Engineer Road & Bridge Manager Scott Morton .. , I Community Development Department Administration MEMORANDUM TO: County Administrator FROM: Community DevelopmentDirector DATE: November 5, 2003 SUBJECT: PGA Reserve/PGA Villages -Internal Traffic Comments Attached is a copy of a report supplied by the Developers of the PGA Reserve/PGA Villages in regard to the impacts of the internal development connections between the two developments. What do you want us to with this? DJM attachments AESERV10(H) cc wIatt: County Attorney Asst. County Admin, Public Works Director County Engineer Road & Bridge Manager Asst. Com Dev, Director Planning Manager .' t- ~ ~=~' Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, MEMORANDUM . Suile 200 3660 Maguire Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32803 To: Mr.-Scott Morlon From: Chris J. Walsh, P,E. Date: October 2 I, 2003 Subject: LOS Evaluation of Plantation Lakes Drive and Champions Way - PGA Village DRIlReserve DR! As requested we projected 2023 PM peak-hour volumes on Plantation Lakes Drive and Champions Way, with the addition of traffic from PGA Village development north of the C-24 Canal. We then evaluated the projected levels of service for these two roadways, The volume projections were conducted by first identifying trip generation projections for each subdivision that will contribute traffic to either of the two subject roadways, Trip generation for each subdivision was based on a PM peak-hour trip generation rate of 0.43 trips per hour as obtained from 48-hour counts conducted at the Reserve entrances (see attached table summarizing count data), Trip generation for Vistana (Timeshare) was based on a rate of 0.43 as used in the PGA ViHage DRl traffic analysis. The trips from each subdivision were then assigned to the subject roadways based on the distribution of traffic. As summarized in the attached table, a maximum PM peak-hour directional volume of205 vehic1es will be observed on Plantation Lakes Drive. On Champions Way, a maximum PM peak-hour directional volume of270 vehicles will be observed. Based on the generalized service volume tables included in the Florida Department of Transportation's 2002 Quality/Level of Service Handbook, both Plantation Lakes Drive and Champions Way will operate at Level of Service (LOS) "C" in 2023 with the addition of traffic from the PGA Village DR!. It . TEL 407 898 1511 FAX 407 894 4791 ~=~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc, Scott Morton, LOS Evaluation of Internal Roadways, October 21, 2003, Page 2 should be noted based on the generalized service volume tables, LOS "A" or "B" cannot be achieved on the subject roadways regardless of the volume_ Therefore, LOS "C" is the best LOS the subject roadways can achieve. As such, with traffic from PGA VilJage, Plantation Lakes Drive and Champions Way will have acceptable operating conditions. It should also be noted that we conducted additional analyses using ITE trip generation rates for the subdivisions in place of the observed trip rates. Although it is fully expected that the single-family units in the applicable subdivisions will continue to generate trips at the observed rate, we conducted the ITE analysis to provide highly conservative volume projections on Plantation Lakes Drive and Champions Way. Based on these volumes as included in the attached table, Plantation Lakes Drive and Champions Way are still projected to operate at LOS "C". H:\049105OO2 - The Reserve\2oo3 Analysis\wp\PlantationLakes&Champions,doc Summary of Trips on Plantation Lakes Drive and Champions Way PM Peak-Hour Plantation Lakes Drive -. ---_.__.__..._-~-- 1- . 5W oir;,,~-irfi~ld Development Quantity Trips 5W of Reserve Blvd Name of Units In Out % Assign EB WB % Assign EB WB External Trips Muirfield 48 13 8 92,7% 7 12 7.3% 1 1 Oak Hill 74 20 12 95.1% 11 19 4.9% ' 1 - 1 Pinehurst 48 13 8 95.1% 8 12 4,9% 1 ° Cypress Point 122 34 18 100,0% 18 34 0,0% ° ° Sabal Creek 121 3r- 19 85.4% 16 28 85.4% 16 ' 28 PGA Village 400 110 62 90,2% 56 99 90.2% 56 9g- SubtotaJ 116 204 75 129 Total (Expected) 116 204 75 129 Level of Service C C C C I Total (ITE) 205 362 129 223 Level of Service I C C I C C I I I I i PM Peak-Hour Champions Way Development Quantity Trips 5 of Reserve Blvd Name I of Units In Out % Assign NB 5B External Trips Spyglass 49 13 8 100,0% 8 13 Kingsmill 118 32 19 100,0% 19 32 Parcel 31 38 10 6 100,0% 6 10 Parcels 34/35/36 187 51.- 29 100.0% 29 51 Vistana 400 98 68 100.0% 68 98 PGA Village 400 110 62 100.0% 62 110 Subtotal 192 314 Total (Expected) 192 314 Level of Service C C Total (lTE) 285 480 Level of Service C C 'Note: Actual observed PM peak-hour rate based on 2001 counts is 0.43 trips per single-family unit H:\0491 05002 - The Reserve\2003 Analysis\xI\Plantation Lakes&ChampionsWay-revisedOct20 10/30/2003 11:47 AM · · ',., ,,. --. tI) I- Z ::J o o ~ w > æ c II.. o )0- Il:: -t :¡¡ :¡¡ ::J tI) GI~ Cl)ca f GI ..,. <D GlQ. <D M -.r >:¡¡ N -to. 1- .....~ o ca o GI 0 <D £:!Q. <D M ..... ~:¡¡ N ÑQ. .....~ o ca OQ I'- Il) £:!Q. <D M I'- ~:¡¡ N ÑQ. - 0) ~ ¡¡; 0) C) E .s :t:: E ca ° ° C) .!. U c: ::J .s ..c ïii U c 0 :¡¡ 1/1 .s c ~+:I 0) 0 OJ! , 'C ca +:I Otl) 0) ca C) ca 2: (5 0) U 'C I;:: 0) , ëñ .¡: 1/1 0) ~~ 0) 2: 0) II:: 0) 2: GI GI 1/1 ~ 1/1" 0) GI ca II:: 0) 11::11:: II:: GI Q, s:. .¡: 1-1- ~ ('» 01'-..... ffill)~ .;.; c:: QI e ::) I,) o Q 1:: o ~ CI) ¡¡ I,) 'è: .¡:; I,) ~ ... 0 ::J a. 0"::-0 J:i5~ ~J:QI O)...:S 0. ca :¡¡ 0),5 D...D...'t) QI ::æ: QI ,sD...=:¡ Cl)O)QI c:,s,Q '§ ~~ ~ '§ 't) .g 'C 5: _ 1/1 0 w ,9- Q. I--=e :=.wa. J!J!::I/I c: ;- !! ::J :~ III Cl)c:0::: c: ::J ~ := æ,Q ~tl :=CQI c: >- c:: E:g~ E E::J 1/1 ° Q" U E'I:: _o¡"; aU.... C):=o .2:-,~ ~ ,_ V,Q ~~e u.E.;! , ca.... ~U¡'t) CE.! ,- ::J ca tl)oo::- 0'""'::) 1l)0~ <DI'-ca o ~ ('» II ~ - c:: ~ '~ 0::: .s ~ æ ~ 't) .s e QI c:: GI C) 1/1 .@- ¡..; .... o ... QI e ::) ~ - ca .a I,) 'II( M .sa ca II:: II c: ,gg ~<D ~8 O)M C) . ,9- I'- .=ró >- - 'Eg call) II.. , 0) Q¡ c: ëñ 'C 0) 2: 0) 1/1 .D o M N c::i II M -.r c::i ô Il) <D 0)- -0 calX) Q:1l) QI~ êõ;:; s:;-.r 1/1 ' QlO E- ¡:: 'C .s ca ã 'jij u 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ~~ 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 .. COO JoAnne Holman, Clerk of the Circuit Court - st. Lucie County File Number:165983B OR BOOK 1169 PAGE Recorded: 09-02-98 08: 34 A. M. rJ R (¡;J ~ n \\n R I 0 ~ fJLl~..-J2-U---2- l!; f¡ RESOLUTION NO. 98-100 UUI ,;,: I 4199~ U' L_____ ____..,_..___J COMMU1'.:;¡Y DEVE:.O?Mi:: T 51. LUCiE COUr~TY. FL '" A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTIONS 89-73, 91- 228, 93-061, 93-125, 95-195, 97 -023, and 97 -086 APPROVING A SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT KNOWN AS THE RESERVE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1, Callaway Land & Cattle Company has filed a Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval with St. Lucie County, Florida and the City of Port St. Lucie, Florida, in accordance with Chapter 380,06, Florida Statutes. 2. Callaway Land & Cattle Company proposes to construct 4,100 dwelling units; 1,600,000 square feet of industrial space; 390,000 290.000 square feet of retail space; 100,000 square feet of office space; and 250 hotel rooms, constituting a Development of Regional Impact on the real property legally described in Section B below, located in St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie, all located in the State of Florida. '" . - '. 3, -- The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County as the governing body of St. Lucie County having jurisdiction over that portion of this project located in the unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider Applications for Development Approval for Developments of Regional Impact. . 'to On December 8, 1988, the St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency held a public hearing of which due notice was published in the Ft. Pierce News Tribune, and recommended to this Board that the Development Order approval for the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve, be granted. 5. The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, on the 15th day of December 1988, held a public hearing on the Development of Regional Impact AppHcãtion for Development Approval for The Reserve, and has heard and considered the testimony taken there at. ~ ~ 6. At this public hearing, and following its closure, the Board of County Commissioners continued any further action on this application until Tuesday, December 20, 1988. ~ ---------- - ~~eUn~rrrnëisf~ ~d~ioo - ¡;trilte 'l'hretl.!R is for deletion ---------- ~ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 ~ Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 1 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 , , .. .~ 1 7, 2 3 4 5 8. 6 7 8 9. 9 10 11 10. 12 13 14 11. 15 16 17 18 12. 19 20 21 22 13. 23 24 ~5. .' " 26 14. 27 28 29 30 15. 31 32 33 34 35 16. 36 37 38 39 40 17. 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0195 On Tuesday, December 20,1988, the Board of County Commissioners removed from the table, the request of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact, for Development Order approval. The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, has received and considered the assessment report and recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. On December 20,1988, the Board adopted Resolution No. 88-357, effective December 28, 1988, granting development order approval to The Reserve. On January 20, 1989, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council voted to appeal the County's Development Order to the Florida Land and WateF-Adjudicatory Commission. In March of 1989, representatives of the new project developers and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council reached a settlement in regard to the items under appeal and the amended Development Order, resolution 89-73, reflects that settlement. On March 14, 1989 this Board granted approval to Resolution 89-73, effective March 21, 1989, which amended the approved Development Order for the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve, and at the same time repealing Resolution 88-357. On November 12, 1991, this Board granted approval to Resolution 91-228, which amended Condition Number 55 of Resolution 89-73, the approved Development Order for the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve. ,,(,.' ... - . ~'. .'," . . ",. . . ~On Jänuary 22, 1993, Callaway Land and Cattle Company filed a Notification of Proposed Change to an Approved Development of Regional Impact, pursuant to Chapter 380.06(19), Florida Statutes for a second amendment to Resolution 89-73. On May 25, 1993, this Board granted approval to Resolution 93-061, which provided for a second amendment to Resolution 89-73, the approved Development Order for the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve and determined that the proposed amendments did not constitute a substantial deviation to the original Development Order. On July 27, 1993, this Board granted approval to Resolution 93-125, which provided for a third amendment to Resolution 89-73, the approved Development Order for the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve and determined tñäfthe proposed amendments did not constitute a substantial deviation to the original Development Order. At the time Resolution 93-061 was approved by the Board, the approval was conditioned upon the applicants, Callaway Land Cattle Company, filing with St. Lucie County, The Florida Department of Community Affairs and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council a - - - - - - - - - - - 6õuble undërITne is fÕÏ- ãddrtiõñ - - - £:trilte TftrsligÀ is for deletion -------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,O. Page 2 PRINT DATE: OB/1B/98 ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 5 ....:6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 3 7___~ 38 39 40 41 42 i .. OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0196 Notification of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact for the purpose of reviewing the upland/wetland mitigation, transportation and any other related conditions effecting the development of this project by November 23, 1993. The Notification of Proposed Change was to include the comments/issues presented at the developer's pre-application meeting held with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council on November 18, 1992 from which there had not yet been any official filing of proposed amendments 18, On May 25, 1993, Callaway Land and Cattle Company filed a Notification of Proposed Change to an Approved Development of Regional Impact, pursuant to Chapter 380.06(19), Florida Statutes for a fourth amendment to Resolution 89-73. 19. On September 21, 1995, the S1. Lucie County Local Planning Agency/Planning and Zon.irig Commission held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published in the Port S1. Lucie News and the Tribune on August 17, 1995 and August 31, 1995 on the proposed amendments to Resolution 89-73, as previously amended. 20, On October 17, 1995, this Board held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published in the Port S1. Lucie News and the Tribune on August 17, 1995, August 31, 1995 and September 26, 1995 on the proposed amendments to Resolution 89-73, as previously amended. 21. On October 17, 1995, this Board granted approval to Resolution 95-195, which provided for a fourth amendment to Resolution 89-73, the approved Development Order for the . pevelopmer:tt of Regionallmpa.ct known as The Reserve. ." . - '.. . 22. On May 17, 1996, the Florida Department of Community Affairs filed with the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission and Notice of Appeal of the approved Amended Development Order for the Reserve (FLWAC Case No. 96-010). 23. On December 16, 1996, the Florida Department of Community Affairs and the developers of The Reserve, Callaway Land and Cattle Company, Inc., entered into a Settlement Agreement for the purpose of addressing the issues raised under the Department of Community Affairs appeal of the approved Amended Final Development Order for The Reserve (Resolution 95- 195). 24. On January 23;-1-997, the developers of The Reserve, Callaway Land and Cattle Company, Inc., requested that the Board of County Commissioners consider an amendment to--tt\e Amended Final Development Order for the Reserve (Resolution 95-195) based on the settlement agreement with the Department of Community Affairs on their appeal of the Approved Amended Final Development Order for The Reserve (Resolution 95-195). - - - - - - - - - - - Dõubie undërïIne is för ãddITiõñ - - - Ð'trilie Tftr81!!ft is for deletion -------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 9B-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 3 PRINT DATE: 08/1B/98 .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 .38 39 40 41 42 25. 26 27. 28, 29, A. B. C, D, OR BOOK J...J...69 PAGE OJ... 97 On February 4,1997, this Board granted approval to Resolution 97-023, which provided for a fifth amendment to Resolution 89-73, the approved Development Order for the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve and determined that the proposed amendments, that were based on the settlement agreement between the Callaway Land and Cattle Company and the Department of Community Affairs on the Department of Community Affairs appeal of the Approved Amended Final Development Order for The Reserve (Resolution 95-195) and further that the proposed amendments did not constitute a substantial deviation to the original Development Order. On Mav 5, 1998, Callawav Land and Cattle Comoanv filed a Notification of Prooosed Chance to an ÄDoroved Develooment of Reaionallmoact. oursuant to Chaoter 380.06(19), Florida Statutes for a sixth amendment to Resolution 89-73. On Aucust 18. 1998, this Board held a oublic hearinc. of which due Dublic notice was Dublished in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune on Julv 30. 1998 on the orooosed amendments to Resolution 89-73. as oreviouslv amended, The Board believes that approving this ftftI:t sixth amendment to the Amended Final Development Order for The Reserve is in the best interest of the public health, safety and public welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County, Florida. and further that the orooosed amendments do not constitute a substantial deviation to the oricinal Develooment Order. as amended. The Board of County Commissioners continues with the following amended FINDINGS of F'Act ånd CONCLùSlbNS of LAW with regard to the Application for Development Approval as cited in Resolution 89-73: AMENDED FINDINGS of FACT The proposed Development is not in an area of Critical State Concern as designated pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. The State of Florida has not adopted a land development plan applicable to the area in which the proposed Development is to be located. On October 21, 1988, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council issued a report and recommendations on this development pursuant to Chapter 380.06(12)(a), Florida Statutes. On August 25, 1995 the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council issued a report and recommendations on the Notification of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved ---------- - ~~eUn~rrrneisf~ ~dŒiœ - Stri(e 'l'Àrell!À is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 9B-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,O, Page 4 PRINT DATE: Oe/1B/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0198 Development of Regional Impact (The Reserve) pursuant to Chapter 380.06(12)(a), Florida Statutes. E, On June 4, 1998 the Treasure Coast Recional Planninc Council issued a reDort and recommendations on the Notification of ProDosed Chance to a Previouslv ADDroved DeveloDment of RecionallmDact (The Reserve). filed Mav 5. 1998 Dursuant to ChaDter 380.06(12)(a). Florida Statutes. and determined that the DroDosed chances to the Final DeveloDment Order for the Reserve would not constitute a substantial deviation to the Dreviouslv aDDroved DeveloDment Order.. E:{;, The proposed Development is consistent with the local comprehensive plan, developmert laws and regulations of St. Lucie County. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. That in a public meeting, duly constituted and assembled this 18th day of Aucust. 1998 4th day of rcbl'tlery, 1~~7. Resolution 98-100. which amends Resolution 97-023 (as corrected bv Resolution 98-086) which amends amended Resolution No. 95-195, which amended Resolution No. 93-125, which amended Resolution No. 93-061, which amended Resolution No. 91-228, which amends Resolution No. 89-73, which amended Resolution No. 88-357 granting Development Order Approval to the Development of Regional Impact known as The '." .., Reserve~. is .h.e.r:eby APPRÇ>VED subject to. the following_ conditions, restrictions and limitations: -. , - APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL 1. The Reserve Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval is incorporated herein by reference. It is relied upon, but not to the exclusion of other available information, by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Substantial compliance with the representations contained in the Application for Development Approval, as modified by Development Order conditions, is a condition for approval. For the purpose of this condition, the Application for Development Approval shall include-the following items: a. Application for Development Approval dated July 9, 1987; b. Supplemental information dated December 3, 1987; June 15, 1988; July 22, ---------- - ~ooïeÜn~rrrneisf~ ~ditioo - Stri](e 'l'ßre1:l!ß is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q. Page 5 PRINT DATE: 08/18/9B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 .' .26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0199 1988; July 29,1988; and August 12,1988; and c. Materials dated September 28, 1988; September 30, 1988; and October 6, 1988, which were received by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council after the formal Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval review process was terminated by the applicant and local public hearings had been scheduled. d. Notice of proposed change dated May 25, 1993. e. Materials submitted January 31, 1994, August 5, 1994, and February 3, 1995 with the Notice of Proposed Change/Substantial Deviation ADA for-the substantial deviation determination. COMMENCEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT 2. In the event the developer fails to commence significant physical development for any development beyond that authorized in the Development Agreement within three years from the effective date of the Development Order (the earlier of two dates if separate Development Orders are issued by St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie), development approval shall terminate and the development shall be subject to further development-of- regional-impact review by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. For the purposes of this paragraph, construction shall be deemed to have been initiated after placement of permanent evidence of a structure (other than a mobile home) on a site, such as the pouring of slabs or footings or any work beyond the stage of excavatioñ or lañdclearing.Phasê ì'shall be completed within twelve years:"rt not completed within that time, further development shall be subject to substantial deviation review. Project buildout dates and phasing build out dates reflected in the ADA are extended four years. Termination Date: This development order shall terminate 24 years from the effective date of Resolutiol189-73, March 21, 2013. Any final development plan approvals not yet received at the completion of this 24 year period will be subject to further review under the provisions of Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, or as subsequently amended. AIR 3. Clearing of specific building sites shall not commence until the developer is ready to construct the building or buildings to be located in that site unless seeding and mulching of disturbed areas are undertaken within 30 days of completion of clearing work. ---------- - ~~eUn~rrrnëisf~~dniœ- S~ri)(e Tfire\t!ft is for deletion ----.------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 9B-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 6 PRINT DATE: OB/1B/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 ~6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0200 4. During land clearing and site preparation, wetting operations or other soil treatment techniques appropriate for controlling unconfined emissions, including seeding and mulching of disturbed areas, shall be undertaken and implemented by the developer to the satisfaction of the City of Port S1. Lucie, S1. Lucie County, and the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation. 5, The developer shall furnish a comprehensive air quality computer modeling study and, if the model shows exceedances, develop a plan and program for carbon monoxide monitoring and abatement, and implement all actions necessary to reduce carbon monoxide emissions to meet State and federal air quality standards according to the following minimum requirements: a. within two months of the effective date of the Development Order.<t!le earlier of two dates if separate Development Orders are issued by S1. Lucie County and the City of Port 51. Lucie; and unless an extension has been agreed upon by the developer and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council), submit a comprehensive air quality computer modeling study according to a study design approved by Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in consultation with the Department of Environmental Regulation; b. in case of exceedances as identified by the modeling study, submit within four months of the approval of the modeling study a plan to mitigate project related traffic air quality impacts and implement the plan to the maximum extent possible. The plan shall be approved by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council in consultation with the Department of Environmental Regulation; and ~... ,. '.;-... '. ...... "".......,.,- " ........ c. implement and monitor the plan. HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES 6. In the event of discovery of any archaeological artifacts during project construction, the developer shall stop construction in that area and immediately notify the Division of Historical Resources in the Florida Department of State. Proper protection, to the satisfaction of the Division, shall be provided by the developer. HABITAT, VEGETATION, AND WILDLIFE 7A. Wetlands 1, 4, 5, 6, 10, 15, 16,26,33,38,39,52,61, 61A, 618, 62, 63, 64,65, 71, 78, 80, 81, 83, 84, 86, 89, 91,92 and 93 as permitted and delineated in the jurisdictional survey and reflected on the Master Plan, Exhibit H (a.k.a. Map H) shall be retained and/or restored if necessary, and maintained in viable condition in perpetuity. The applicant shall obtain required permit approvals to alter/restore these wetlands from the South Florida Water ---------- - ~~leun~rrrneisf~ ~d~iœ - SErilte Threu.!!R is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,O, Page 7 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1-2--- 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ,. "- ,0 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 YT- 38 39 40 41 42 78. OR BOOK 11..69 PAGE 0201 Management District and the US Army Corp of Engineers. To ensure that listed species of the preserved wetlands are not adversely impacted, the permit approval of the wetland alteration/restoration shall be based on coordination with and review by the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission. Any development of areas set aside for preservation or special protection of endangered or threatened plants or animals designated as endangered, threatened or species of special concern, as identified on Map H, shall be subject to development order review pursuant to Section 380.05(19)(b)15, Florida Statutes. Any alteration or modification to any other preserved jurisdictional wetland that is done consistent with any Federal, State or regional permitting agency shall not constitute a substantial deviation. Such wetlands modification shall be included in the annual Development of Regional Impact status report, Map H in the Development Order shall be amended, for updating purposes, to ensure that the DRI development plan is consistent with the permit modification no later than six months after South FloridaWater Management District accepts certification of the surfacð-water management system for the fourth (4th) Reserve Golf Course (PUD II). Viability and maintenance shall be assured by deed restriction, good development and drainage design plan which will include quality control measures based on South Florida Water Management District's best management practices. Assignment of future preservation and maintenance responsibility shall be te an entity approved by the South Florida Water Management District or designated in Rule 9J-2.041(9), FAC. This assignment shall occur prior to build-out of the phase in which wetlands occur. Adverse impacts that occur due to factors within the developers' reasonable control, to any of the identified wetlands prior to build-out of this project shall be the responsibility of the developer to repair. Any restoration conducted pursuant to this condition shall be completed in consultation with, -:snd in a manner approved by, tile South F:c,;da Water-Mâlis!Ìemant DIstrict and/or tha U~ Army Corps of Engineers based on consultation with Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission to ensure that preserved wetlands are not adversely impacted. .. No building permits or certificates of occupancy shall be issued for any part of the Reserve Development of Regional Impact after the effective date of this development order (the earlier of two dates if separate development orders are issued by St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie), until: 1. the ditch connecting wetland 518 to the C24 outfall route has been plugged up to the rim of the wetland; and, 2. after January 1, ,.~ ~~7 unless all of the remaining restoration required by this condition has been completed and approved by the South Florida Water Management District. Wetlands 52 and 76 shall be preserved until such time as the Developer has created a ---------- - ~~eun~rITneisf~ ~ditioo - SEril£e Tftrekl!!A is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 8 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 .6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 _38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0202 replacement wetland in mitigation for these preserved wetlands to be removed. Such created wetlands shall be constructed to fully replace the functions and values equal to those of wetlands 62 and 76. No removal of wetlands 62 and 76 shall take place until the created wetlands are complete, inspected and approved by the South Florida Water Management District. 7C, Any wetland habitat creation permitted under this condition (7) shall be completed by the earlier to occur of January 1, 1997 or the issuance of any final PUD, plat or building permit for the two thousandth (200oth) residential unit in The Reserve. 8. No final planned development or plat approvals shall be issued after January 1, 1994 until one of the following actions have been completed: . a. The developer has completed, to the reasonable satisfaction of the South Florida Water Management District, the creation of 50.0 acres of wetland habitat in mitigation for wetland habitat already destroyed on this project and previously required to be mitigated by South Florida Water Management District; or b. The developer has dedicated, by conservation easement or some other instrument acceptable to St. Lucie County and South Florida Water Management District, to St. Lucie County, or another entity acceptable to St. Lucie County, and South Florida Water Management District, 50.0 acres of upland habitat; or c. The dtlveioper hasãccðrnplishéd a combinciiion'of the actions described iri" (a) and (b) above which is acceptable to both South Florida Water Management District and St. Lucie County. If the developer chooses to meet all or part of this responsibility by creation of wetland habitat, then the continued viability and maintenance of this habitat shall be assured by deed restriction, good development and drainage plan design, and assignment of future preservation and. maintenance responsibility to any entity approved by South Florida Water Management District prior to build-out of the phase in which the created wetland occurs, 1f1he developer chooses to meet all or part of this mitigation responsibility by dedicating upland habitat as in option (b) above,' such lands shall be transferred with restrictions that require their preservation as nature habitat area. Such lands shall not be credited towards the requirement that the Developer preserve 25 percent of the upland habitat on site, pursuant to - - - - - - - - - - - Dõuble Underi1ne is för ãdditiõñ - - - £tri)(e Tkretl!!ft is for deletion -------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 9 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 ...:..' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0203 Condition 15. d. Any wetland habitat creation permitted under this condition (8) shall be completed by the earlier to occur of January 1, 1994 or the issuance of final PUD or plat approval for the two thousandth (2000th) residential unit in The Reserve. 9, The developer will provide S1. Lucie County and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council copies of the permits or other instruments showing compliance with the above conditions, No Final planned development or plat approval shall be issued after January 1, 1995 , uniir- one of the following has been completed: a. The developer has completed, to the reasonable satisfaction of the South Florida Water Management District, the creation of wetland habitat as mqui~ed by South Florida Water Management District Permits (above and beyond any wetland habitat created pursuant to the previous recommended condition), in mitigation for wetland habitat already destroyed on this project site; or b. The developer has dedicated, by conservation easement or some other instrument acceptable to S1. Lucie County and the South Florida Water Management District, to S1. Lucie County, or another entity acceptable to S1. Lucie County and South Florida Water Management District, additional uplanä habitat :àccèptable to South Florida Water-Maña'g'ément Dis(Í'Ìct· (above and beyond any upland habitat deeded over pursuant to the previous conditions); or c, The developer has accomplished a combination of the actions described in (a) and (b) above which is acceptable to both South Florida Water Management District and S1. Lucie County. d. In the event developer has been unable to complete the creation of the required additional acreage of wetland habitat as described in (a) above on or prior to January 1, 1995, it may post a security for its completion of performance. The form and content of the instrument providing said security shall be subject to the approval of St. Lucie County and shall include a sufficient amount of non-disturbed quality upland habitat acreage, as described above, equal to the acreage of wetlands which have not yet been created in accordance with (a) above. Such habitat posted in accordance with this section shall be released by the acre in exchange for ---------- - ~~leÜn~rnneisf~~ditioo- Stri)¡e TAret:\!A is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 10 PRINT DATE: OB/1B/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 ...::6'- 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK :1.169 PAGE 0204 each acre of wetland habitat subsequently created by the Developer in furtherance of his satisfying the condition set forth in 9(a). This procedure shall be deemed to satisfy the conditions required for issuance of final planned development, plat approvals or building permits after January 1, 1995. But under no circumstances shall planned development or plat approval be issued after January 1, 1997 without completion of wetland habitat as described in (a) above. e. Any wetland habitat creation permitted under this section shall be completed by the earlier to occur of January 1, 1997 or the issuance of a final planned development or plat approval for the two thousandth (2000th) residential unit in The Reserve. The developer will provide 51. Lucie County and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council copies of the permits or other instruments showing compliance with the above conditions. 10. Mitigation Master Plan for the Reserve DRI must be submitted to and approved by the South Florida Water Management District prior to wetlands mitigation required by this 0.0, occurring on site. As a minimum, the Master Plan shall set forth: a, The general criteria for construction and maintenance of wetland habitat; b. identify the location of all proposed mitigation relative to preserved wetland and upland systems, the surface water management system, and , devélòpment; ~_.,. . ..·ò...' ,.. c. provide for a mitigation, monitoring, and maintenance program; and d. include a justified estimate of total cost of implementing the proposed mitigation and monitoring program. To be approved, mitigation plans must be found to fully replace the functions and values provided by exempted wetlands that have been or will be eliminated. Reasonable assurance of financial and institutional ability to carry out the commitments included in the approved mitigation plan may be provided by anyone or combination·o~the following: a. a surety bond in the amount equal to 125 percent of the cost estimate for implementing the approved mitigation and monitoring plan; ---------- - ~~leUn~rrrneisf~ ~d~ioo - Dtrihe Tß1'8t!.!ß is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,O. Page 11 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~t3-' 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 DR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0205 b. performance guarantee to St. Lucie County and/or the City of Port St. Lucie as part of a project construction guarantee, provided the guarantee adequately covers costs; c, cash bond or letter of credit from a financial institution; d. escrow agreements which include money, land, or improvements; and, e. performance prior to wetland loss only applies to mitigation for wetlands not yet destroyed. _.Jhe specific form and adequacy of the guarantee shall be subject to approval by St. Lucie County, if mitigation occurs within the County, or the City of Port St. Lucie and the TCRPC, if mitigation occurs within the City. FinancialHgoarantees shall not be released for any portion of the project until work is completed, inspected, and approved in writing by the South Florida Water Management District. The annual report shall include a summary of wetland mitigation accomplished pursuant to the approved master plan. A copy of the approved Mitigation Master Plan will be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. 11, Lakes or canals shall not be excavated within 200 feet of any wetlands which are preserved or restored on the project site, Wells in the shallow aquifer shall not be located within 300 feet of any wetlands which are preserved or restored on the project site. Any exceptions to this condition must be approved by the South Florida Water Management District on the "'·..-."ÌJäSis of'soii vi other data showir.~ thatwCiteddulè: elevaiioì1s withii1 pìeserv£:û wel:idîiÛ5 would not be adversely affected. A copy of any South Florida Water Management District permit or other consent addressing this condition will be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. 12. To help assure that maintenance or implementation of predevelopment hydroperiods occurs within the preserved and restored wetlands and within any wetland mitigation are~s, finäl drainage plans shall provide for routing of sufficient volumes of runoff from acceptable sources to wetlands prior to routing of any excess runoff to lake systems. Control elevations shall be established consistent with the intent to maintain or improve predevelopment -hydroperiods within all wetland areas. The South Florida Water Management District r¡1ust approve the routing of runoff and control el~v_~ions as shown on the finat-efainage plans to achieve the intent indicated above. Copies of the South Florida Water Management District construction permits will be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. ---------- - ~~eun~rnnëisf~ ~d~iœ - CtriJte Ta1!8U!ft is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O, Page 12 PRINT DATE: 08/1B/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 OR BOOK 1.169 PAGE 0206 13, The developer shall preserve and maintain a buffer zone of native upland edge vegetation around all preserved, restored, or created wetlands on site in accordance with the requirements of the South Florida Water Management District. The buffer zone shall include a canopy, understory, and ground cover of native upland species including saw palmetto, wiregrass, gallberry, Lyonia, or other upland species subject to approval of the TCRPC. The upland buffer may include slash pine and wax myrtle, but these species shall not be used in determining the location of the boundary between the wetland and upland. The buffer zone requirements of preserved or created wetlands for listed species shall be in accordance with the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission guidelines as contained in the Florida Administrative Code, as of the time that the buffer zone is developed. The requirements of the upland buffer shall include a total area of at least ten square feet per linear foot of wetland, except where an expanded upland buffer has been required for protection of th'e Sandhill Crane as recommended by the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission . .--- (provided for under the approved management plan referenced herein, and attached hereto and made a part thereof as an exhibit) and be located such that no less than fifty percent of the total shoreline is buffered by a minimum width of ten feet of upland habitat. Upland buffer shall be clearly delineated, and roped off prior to any land clearing within 200 feet of any wetland to be preserved or restored. 14, No further land clearing or development activities shall take place on the Reserve DRI until: a, the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service approve a management plan for protection and management of the Red-cockaded Woodpecker; and, ,6"" -..-.... L. '- . St. 'Lucie COLlnly is nutif¡~d in writing tl ¡at the1-."an~g:=meït ph:ìFriS éip¡:;rovi}d.' , . 27 The management plan shall provide for the permanent preservation of any 28 colony sites deemed necessary by the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish 29 Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Each preserve colony 3 0 site shall be no less than ten acres in size and have boundaries no less than 3 1 200 feet from all existing cavity trees within the preserve. The Preserved 32 colony sites may be irregularly configured and should include the best 33 habitat for the Red-cockaded Woodpecker contiguous with the colony. The 34 Developer shall not develop the under1and or understory within the Preserve 35 area. The plan shall also provide for sufficient foraging opportunities within 3 6 one-half mile of the colony site to meet the recommended criteria set by the 37 United States Fish and Wildlife Service Red-cockaded Woodpecker 38 Recovery Plan. The-plan must also include a monitoring program to insure 39 that sufficient foraging opportunities are maintained. The plan may be 40 updated and amended and the preserve areas modified from time to time 4 1 to accommodate then-current conditions with the approval of the Florida 42 Game and Freshwater Fish Commission and the U,S. Fish and Wildlife ---------- - ~~eun~rITneisf~ ~d~ioo - Ðtri][e Tfirs\i!ft. is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,O. Page 13 PRINT DATE: OB/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 :6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 --38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0207 Service. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer to implement the approved plan. A copy of the approved plan shall be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. 15. The developer shall preserve no less than 25 percent (490 acres) of native upland habitat in accordance with the St. Lucie County's Comprehensive Plan for land within the jurisdiction of the County and with the City's comprehensive plan for land within the jurisdiction of the City. Native upland habitat preserved and protected by deed restrictions pursuant to wetland buffer zone requirements and upland habitat required for the protection of species of special regional concern, induding the Red-cockaded Woodpecker colony sites and Sandhill Crane upland buffer, may be counted toward meeting this minimum requirement. The balance of this preserved acreage may be the result of micrositing of development or selective clearing of areas to be developed, including individual lots when developed, provided maintenance of habitat is required through deed restriction. However, as a minimum, preserve areas shall be of appropriate size, quality, and arrangement to maintain existing populations of species of special regional concern on the property. No credit toward this 25 percent may be given for land set aside in compensation for wetlands destroyed by the development which are required to be mitigated. Native upland habitat is defined as areas exhibiting native species in all layers of canopy, understory, and ground cover that are present. Areas with native trees, but planted ground cover do not qualify as native uplands (e.g., improved pasture). The developer shall identify on a current good quality aerial photo the areas preserved pursuant to this condition and submit the marked aerial and indicate the acreage in the .' armu~.(~~ort req.!..!!f.P,q)y Sect!on 380.06, Florida Sta~\ltes. The ann'Ja! report shell !nclllce. copies of deed restrictions assuring preservation of native upland habitat acreage. Preservation on individual lots, if used to meet the habitat requirement, shall be established by the developer through permanent deed restrictions. The annual report shall also include copies of deed or other restrictions assuring preservation of native upland habitat acreage. -a\lr_......._ -. 16. Prior to commencement of clearing activities on any portion of the Reserve site, the Developer must survey for gopher tortoise burrows. Protecting in situ, or relocation into a suitable on-site preserve is required before development of the parcel surveyed. Ifgopher tortoise burrows are found, any Florida mouse, gopher frog, and Eastern Indigo snake found shall be provided for as well. The plan for protection of these species shall be reviewed and approved by the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission and the U,S. Fish and Wildlife Service. After approval of the plan, specific parcels may be cleared andaeveloped subject to compliance with the methods and procedures stated in the plan without further approval. The annual report required by section 380.06 Florida Statutes, shall include a summary of survey and relocation efforts prepared by a qualified biologist. ----------- ~~eun~rrrnëisf~ ~dfiioo - Ðt~i]¡e TRreligÄ is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 9B-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O, Page 14 PRINT DATE: OB/1B/98 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0208 1 17. As a minimum, the Developer shall preserve two areas that provide potential nesting habitat 2 for Sandhill Cranes. One of these areas shall include wetlands 80, 81, and 83 and 3 associated buffers (as identified in Map H). The other shall include portions of wetland 61, 4 (which includes 61A or 61 B) and associate buffers (as more specifically identified on Map H). 5 The developer shall, after consultation with the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish 6 Commission, provide a species and habitat management plan by March 5, 1997, as 7 referenced herein at DO conclusions of law and attached hereto as Exhibit B. A detailed site 8 plan delineating the areas required by this condition shall be attached hereto and made a part 9 of hereof. These wetlands areas shall be depicted on Map H as preserve areas consistent 10 with Conditions 7a and 13. 11 12 Management of the non-golf course portions of the buffers and the wetlands shall be 13 pursuant to recommendations of the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. 14 15 During the months of December 1, to April 30, no construction within 300 feet of any 16 preserved or restored wetland shall occur until the wetland has been surveyed for Sandhill 17 Crane nests. In the event that active nests are found, construction shall not occur until July 18 or 90 days after the eggs hatch, whichever occurs first. Construction of these areas during 19 the months and days indicated may proceed based in coordination with the Florida Game 20 and Freshwater Fish Commission. 21 22 17 A, The application of pesticides, nematicides, and fungicides to the golf courses and other areas 23 at The Reserve shall be done only in accordance with the applicable product label instruction, 24 shall be applied only by, or under the supervision of, State of Florida licensed applicators, 25 and shall be applied pursuant to the Integrated Pest Management Plan, attached hereto, and ~ S', -.~,~" as it....'TIs~/.-~e amended ..from time to time,with the ~p~~v~! of the Flo:-ida D!')partm6r:td 27 Agriculture. 28 29 18. Prior to further development activity, the developer shall provide the Treasure Coast Regional 30 Planning Council with a letter assuring that access will be allowed to The Reserve 31 Development of Regional Impact in perpetuity for the purposes of monitoring compliance of 32 the project with conditions set forth. 33 34 19. In the event that it is determined that any additional representative of a plant or'animal 35 species of special regional concern (as defined in the Treasure Coast Regional Planning 3 6 Council Assessment Report for The Reserve Development of Regional Impact) is resident 37 on, or otherwise is significantly dependent upon, The Reserve--gevelopment of Regional 3 8 Impact property, the developer shaff cease all activities which might negatively affect that 39 individual population and immediately notify both the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish 40 Commission and !he U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Proper protection, to the satisfaction of 41 both agencies, shall be provided by the developer. 42 ---------- - ~~eUn~rrrnëisf~~ditioo- SEdIta Tlueli!1i is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q. Page 15 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 ;'6~ 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0209 20, Concurrent with construction in any phase of the development, all Melaleuca, Brazilian Pepper, and Australian Pine which occur within that phase shall be removed. Removal shall be in such a manner that avoids seed dispersal by any of these species. There shall be no planting of these species on site. DRAINAGE 21. The developer shall design and construct the stormwater management system to retain the maximum volumes of water consistent with providing flood protection. The system shall be designed and constructed to retain or detain with filtration, as a minimum, the first one inch of runoff or the runoff from a one-hour, three-year storm event, whichever is greater. Required retention--volumes may be accommodated in a combination of vegetated swales, dry retention areas, lakes with vegetated littoral zones, or other suitable retention structures.-- All discharges from the surface water management systeriHònall meet the applicable water quality standards as established by the Florida Administrative Code. Completed construction pursuant to a valid South Florida Water Management District construction permit for a stormwater management system shall constitute compliance with this condition, 22, The developer shall design and construct the surface water management system such that maintenance of normal hydroperiods within restored, preserved, and created wetlands can be guaranteed against the negative impacts of activities within the project boundaries, and that the functions and values provided by these habitats will be maintained. Under no circumstances shall unfiltered runoff from impervious surfaces and parking areas be diverted direciiy into wetlands ë7rUflte·.Final draindgè'pl~ns sl1all be' submitted to S{¡úth Fiorid~ 'vVl::lœr Management District, St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie. At a minimum, such plans shall depict how preserved and created wetland areas will be incorporated into the development site plans for each individual development area or drainage basin with appropriate supporting information to demonstrate how sufficient quantities of surface runoff from portions of the developed areas will be conveyed to wetland areas in order to maintain or improve their existing hydroperiod. Clearing of the land in a development area or drainage basin shall not begin until plans are approved by the appropriate agencies Jor thë development area or drainage basin. Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council will be provided copies of any construction permits issued by South Florida Water Management District. 23. The developer shall berm and swale or otherwise design and construct the golf course- stormwater management systems to retain the first one-half inch of runoff from a one-hour, three-year storm event, prior to discharge of excess water to wetland habitats. 24. Maintenance and management efforts required to assure the continued viability of preserved - - - - - - - - - - - ~~eun~rrrneisf~~d~ioo - -- S~rite Tftr8t1.!ft is for deletion -------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 16 PRINT DATE: OB/1B/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ,22 23 24 25 ~6· 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0210 and created wetland littoral zone and upland habitats and the proper operation of all components of the surface water management system shall be the financial and physical responsibility of the developer. Any entities subsequently approved by St. Lucie County or the City of Port St. Lucie to replace the developer shall be required, at a minimum, to assume the responsibilities outlined above, All golf course irrigation systems shall be designed in such a manner as to allow for a minimum 100 foot separation from any existing or proposed potable water well, (ref FAC 17- 6.040(4)(q». Should the waste treatment system not meet the standards of a Class I reliability, then this minimum setback shall be 500 feet. 25, The developer shall establish a vegetated and functional littoral zone as a part of the surfaèe water management system of lakes. Prior to construction of the system for each development area or drainage basin of the project, the developer shall prepare a design and management plan for the wetlandllittoral zone that will be developed as part of that system. The plan shall: a. include plan view and site location; b, include typical cross sections of the surface water management system showing the average water elevation after taking account the effects of wellfield pumping and irrigation withdrawals on the lake system and the :-3 foot contour (ie, below average elevation); c. specify how vegetation is to be established within this zone, including the - ~x'ct:fa t~;itlt:thod, iyþt:i'arid timing ùí ar"lY pianting ur rIlLJI(;:-ling tu bC:llfúViû~d; and d. provide a description of any management monitoring and maintenance procedures to be followed in order to assure the continued viability and health of the littoral zone. The littoral zone as established shall consist entirely of native vegetation and shall be maintained permanently as part of the water management ' system. As a minimum, ten square feet of vegetated littoral zone per linear foot of lake shoreline shall be established. The plan shall be subject to approval by St. Lucie County, the City of Port St. Lucie, and the South Florid~ Water Management Distriet--prior to the beginning of any excavation activity. Littoral zones shall be constructed concurrent with lake excavation _and final grading, Operational permits for the surface water management system shall not be issued until such time as the littoral zones have been constructed and inspected. ---------- - ~~eUn~rrrneisf~~drriœ - -- Gtrilte Thret:t!Jh is for deletion -------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O, Page 17 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 :5 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK ~169 PAGE 0211 WATER SUPPLY: POTABLE AND NONPOTABlE WATER 26. The primary source of golf course irrigation water shall be water derived from the surface water management system of lakes supplemented by surficial aquifer wells as permitted by SFWMD. No withdrawals from lakes shall be permitted which would adversely affect wetlands required by the Development Order to be preserved on site, or wetlands and littoral zones created on site as mitigation for wetland functions and values lost as a result of this development. At the time of water use permit issuance or renewal, the developer shall comply with applicable South Florida Water Management District rules and criteria for permit issuance, which criteria may in the future require the use of reclaimed water. The continued or proposed use of surficial aquifer wells to supply irrigation water to golf courses shall occur only as permitted by South Florida Water Management District. 27. Construction of additional golf courses beyond those already constructed shall not occur until it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the South Florida Water Management District that sufficient irrigation water ,can be derived on a sustainable basis from wastewater sources and surface water management system lakes to provide for irrigation requirements without adversely affecting wetlands required by the Development Order to be preserved on site, or wetlands and littoral zones created on site as mitigation for wetland functions and values lost as a result of this development. 28. All water use by The Reserve Development of Regional Impact shall be metered, whether derived from surface water management system lakes for irrigation or from wellfields servicing The Reserve Utility Corp. for domestic use. Annual water use data shall be ,f)~ovidcd to the S~uth Florida WatCf Mcr.ogcment Dii~!~~ !:::K1 Treasure.Coast Reg:or.:::11 Planning Council as part of the annual report to be submitted by the developer as required by Section 380.06, Florida Statues. 29. To reduce the demand for irrigation water, a minimum of 30 percent of all landscaping material and 50 percent of all planted trees shall be native plants adapted to the soil and climatic conditions occurring on site. 30. To the maximum extent consistent with wetland protection, surficial aquifer wellfields 'serving The Reserve Development of Regional Impact shall be located such that principal land uses within the cone of influence of such wells are open space, preserve, or residential area. In no case shall development which would use, handle, store, or produce hazardous or toxic materials occur within the cone of influence (Le., one foot drawdown area) of a surfÍcial aquifer potable water supply well, unless such use, handling, storage, or production is consistent with binding wellfield protection regulations. 31. In no case shall reverse osmosis reject water be utilized for irrigation purposes unless - - - - - - - - - - - ~~eun~rITneisf~~d~ioo - -- Strilte Tß!'eli!!ft is for deletion -------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 18 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 32, 33. 34. 35. '.~".,~ ' OR BOOK 1..169 PAGE 021..2 approved by the appropriate state permitting authority. Water-saving plumbing devices shall be required in all construction (both residential and nonresidential) to reduce potable and nonpotable water demand. These devices shall include low flush toilets and efficient faucets and shower heads to help reduce the use of potable water for these uses. Rates charged for potable water use shall be structured to encourage water conservation. All residential water requirements shall be supplied by a common utility which shall provide water service to all existing and proposed development, except Sabal Creek Phases I, II, 111 and IV. No final planned development or plat approval shall be issued for The Reserve Development of Regional Impact beyond construction authorized by the Development Agreement executed by the Department of Community Affairs, until the South Florida Water Management District notifies S1. Lucie County and the City of Port S1. Lucie in writing that the method of providing potable and non potable water needs to such further development proposed by the developer is permitted and will not have adverse impacts to: a, wetlands required by the Development Order to be preserved on site or wetlands and littoral zones created on site as mitigation for wetland functions and values lost as a result of this development; b. the potentiometric head of the Floridan Aquifer, if applicable; and .~ ~:... ~ Jit-or...... _....~ '. c, the ability of existing legal users to meet their permitted potable and non potable requirements. Parameters and methods of hydrologic investigations undertaken to demonstrate that a sufficient source of water is available to serve further development proposed by the developer without adversely impacting the items listed above shall be established to the satisfaction of the South Florida Water Management District. Receipt of a valid South Florida Water Management District consumptive use permit for a withdrawal shall constitute compliance with this section. 36. All residential, commercial and industrial water and sewer requirements shall be..s.upplied by the a common utility which shall provide water and-sewer service to all existing and propõsed development, except Sable Creek Phases I, II, and IV, and Reserve Plantation I, IIA, and liB, which contain lots which are in excess of the minimum requirements of one-half acre and any lots proposed within Sable Creek Phase 11\ (56 acre parcel) providing such lots be at least one acre in size. At such time and in the event water and/or sewer lines are made - - - - - - - - - - - Dõubïe undërïIne is fõi ãddItiõñ - - - ÐÊrilte 'Fftrst:I!ft is for deletion -------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 19 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 :5, . , 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0213 available to lots contained the subdivisions referenced herein, they shall be required to hook up to the common utility service then provided by the utility company. 37. Any consents or other approvals required from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and/or in consultation with other governmental agencies, as a condition to further development approvals being issued after the effective date of the development order, shall not be subject to unreasonable delay after all submissions and other data required by such agency (including TCRPC) from developer, has been supplied. 38. Maintenance and management efforts required to assure the continued proper operation of all components of the central water supply system shall be the financial and physical . responsibility of The Reserve Gommunity Development District until such time as it may be conveyed to another entity. Any entities subsequently authorized to replace The Reserve Community Development District shall be required, at a minimum, to-assume the responsibilities outlined above or delegate such responsibilities to another entity to the satisfaction of the City of Port St. Lucie and St. Lucie County. Appropriate plans, specifications and applications for the water plant expansion shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) upon the existing water treatment facility reaching a finishing water maximum day demand equal to 80% of the DEP's rated plant capacity. Construction of the expansion shall begin before or when the facility achieves a maximum day finished water production equal to 90% of DEP's approved rated plant capacity. 39. The unobligated Floridan Aquifer well as referenced on Map F, dated July 1987, revised ~-l'Jo'Jembor 1988; 3S conreinod in Tho ROSCF'JO De'/clopment:;f Reg:=r:ol mpactl\p~!!~tio~ for Development Approval, shall be capped and abandoned in accordance with South Florida Water Management District criteria prior to commencement of development outside the area authorized for development in the Development Agreement. The obligated well referenced on Map F as described above shall be capped and abandoned in accordance with South Florida Water Management District criteria within 30 days of resolving such obligation for off-site use. WASTEWATER 40. Development shall only occur concurrently with the provision of adequate central wastewater treatment services. Prior to appliGation for building permits for any part of The Reserve De'veTopment of Regional Impact at the beginning of each phase, the developer s-hall demonstrate that adequate treatment facilities will exist on schedule to handle all wastewater generated from both completed and planned development. Evidence of adequate treatment and disposal capability shall be subject to approval by St. Lucie County and the City of Port 51. Lucie in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection. ---------- - ~~eun&rrrneisf~ ~dITioo - S~ri](e Tftrelt!!ft is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,O. Page 20 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12--- 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 '/.5 6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 3 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0214 The central wastewater treatment system shall be expanded based on the following flow capacities (actual 3 peak month average daily): a. When flows reach 60% of permitted capacity, a consultant will have been chosen. b. When flows reach 70% capacity, appropriate plans, specifications and application for wastewater plant expansion shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Regulation. c. When flows reach 75% capacity, construction shall begin and be completed and certified prior to flows reaching 95% of permitted capacity. 41. The existing and proposedwasfewater treatment and disposal system shall be constructed or modified to produce irrigation quality water so that spray irrigation of such water will be the primary wastewater disposal method. Excess wastewater may be disposed of through percolation ponds, as permitted. 42. Maintenance and management efforts required to assure the continued proper operation of all components of the central wastewater treatment system shall be the financial and physical responsibility of The Reserve Community Development District until such time as conveyed to another entity. Any entities subsequently authorized to replace The Reserve Community Development District shall be required, at a minimum, to assume the responsibilities outlined above or delegate such responsibilities to another entity to the satisfaction of St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie. .....o:r.:.. . .' . . ~: . HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE 43, Within three months of the effective date of the Development Order (the earlier of two dates if separate Development Orders are issued by St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie), the developer shall submit a hazardous materials management plan for review and approval by the City of Port St. Lucie, and St. Lucie County in consultation with the South Florida Water Management District and the Department of Environmental Protection. If said approval is not obtained within six months of the effective date of the Development Order, no further final planned development approvals or plats shall be issued for any part of the project until approval is obtained. The plan shall: a. require disclosure by -ªILowners or tenants of non- residential property of all hazardous materials proposed to be stored, used, or generated on the premises; b. require inspection of all business premises storing, using, or generating ---------- - Dõubïe undëriIne is för ãddItiõñ - Gtri](e TÀretl!ft is for deletion --------.-- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 9B-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 21 PRINT DATE: OB/1B/9B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 -14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~d-'- 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0215 hazardous materials prior to the commencement of operation, and periodically thereafter to assure that adequate facilities and procedures are in place to properly manage hazardous materials projected to occur; c. provide minimum standards and procedures for storage, prevention of spills, containment of spills, and transfer and disposal of such materials; d. provide for proper maintenance, operation, and monitoring of hazardous materials management systems including spill and hazardous materials containment systems; e. detail actions and procedures to be followed in case of spills or other accidents involving hazardous materials; and f. guarantee financial and physical responsibility for spill cleanup. MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE 44. In addition to all information required by Chapter 380, Florida Statutes; by Chapter 9J-2, Florida Administrative Code; by S1. Lucie County; and by the City of Port 51. Lucie for inclusion in an annual report to be prepared and submitted by the developer for The Reserve Development of Regional Impact, the following information must be included: a. current, good quality aerial photo showing native upland habitat preserved pursuant to the Development Order, acreage of the preserved areas, and '-copj~s oj" c.J~~d restrictions"assuring '¡Jres'ervaiion or 11alive uµland habili:ii acreage; ..............,¡\..- b. summary of Gopher tortoise surveys and relocation efforts as required by the Development Order; and c. water use data (amounts from all sources) per Development Order condition requiring metered water use sources. EDUCATION 45. From the date of enactment of this resolution, until January 1, 1989, any residel1tial development-permitted within The Reserve, shall be subject to the voluntary school assessment incorporated as a part of that unit's development approval. Effective January 1, 1989, all residential development within this project shall be subject to the terms and requirements of S1. Lucie County Ordinance 88-16, School Impact Fees, and as may subsequently be amended. ---------- - ~~eun~rrrneisf~ ~d~ioo - E:trilte Tarel:l!a is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 9B-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,O. Page 22 PRINT DATE: OB/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 6-~ 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 11..69 PAGE 0216 RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 46, The developer shall reserve a minimum of eight acres of land in four parcels no less than two acres each in size to be deeded free and clear of all liens and encumbrances to homeowners' associations within The Reserve Development of Regional Impact for the establishment of recreational facilities geared to the needs of children living within the development. Parcels shall be reserved in an arrangement that will most conveniently serve the most residents based on proximity of residential areas. The developer shall establish a fund of not less than $5,000 for each parcel to be turned over to the appropriate homeowners' association to provide initial funding for facilities on each parcel. The appropriate equipment or facilities to be developed on each parcel shall be determined by the homeowners' association. 47. Within one year of the effective date of the Development Ordenthe latter of two dates if separate Development Orders are issued by St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie). the developer shall provide a plan for the provision of beach access points and parking facilities to meet the demand created by residential development in The Reserve Development of Regional Impact. The plan shall include an evaluation and estimate of the demand for beach access points in both St. Lucie and Martin Counties. The methodology used to project beach access and parking demand shall be agreed upon by the developer and approving agencies prior to plan initiation and shall be submitted as part of the completed plan. The plan shall provide a program for meeting any projected demand. The plan must be approved by St. Lucie County. Martin County, and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council may provide the county comments on the plan. If approval is not obtained within two years of the effective date of the Development Order as aforementioned, no further building permits shall be issued for any part of the project until approval is obtained. Beach access pc:nts--ar.d parkir.g facHitics shan.b~ CDn3tructcd 3nd ~vailablc to ser;:: prcjc~ted demand i:1 accordance with the approved plan. Subject to the foregoing. improvements required of the Developer shall not exceed. in proportion to the level of service or facilities made available by the respective Counties for their residents. . ",... POLICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY 48, Prior to the issuance of any building permits. in any portion of this project in the unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, the following assessment shall be paid' for the purpose of police/public safety: Residential: Single Family MulU-Family $111 per unit $ 99 per unit Office: Medical Office $231 per 1000 sf - - - - - - - - - - - DõubIe underl1ne is fõr ãdditiõñ - - - Ct.~iJte Tß~eli!k is for deletion - - - - - '- - - Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 23 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 021 7 Financial Office Other Office $506 per 1000 sf $127 per 1000 sf Retail: 0- 49,999.9 sf 50,000 - 99,999.9 sf 100,000 - 199,999.9 sf $250 per 1000 sf $298 per 1000 sf $299 per 1000 sf Hotel/Motel $111 per unit Upon the enactment of a formal public safety (police) impact fee ordinance by the S1. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners, the t~rms and conditions of that ordinance shall apply to the unincorporated portions of this project, described in Section B of this resolution. FIRE PROTECTION 49. The developer shall reserve one parcel, a minimum size of two acres and configured to meet the needs of the 51. Lucie County/F1. Pierce Fire District, within the Reserve Commerce Park. This site shall be conveyed to the Fire District in a manner and time acceptable to the Fire District, if so required. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any residential unit within The Reserve, including any hotel/motel unit, the developer shall pay to the S1. Lucie County/F1. Pierce Fire District the sum of $225 per unit to meet the fire protection needs of this development. Up~n-,ths enact~:mt,~f--a.fcrm~! public sé1fety {fire} il'!1pact fee,ordif'ance b~' the St LI.!dc County Board of County Commissioners, the terms and conditions of that ordinance shall apply to those portions of this project, described in Section B of this resolution. ENERGY 50. In the final site and building design plans, the developer shall: a. incorporate those energy conservation measures identified on pages 250.1 and 25D.2 of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval; b. comply witt1tne Florida Thermal Efficiency Code Part VII, Chapter 553, F'lorida Statutes; and, c, to the maximum extent feasible, incorporate measures identified in the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's Regional Energy Plan dated May, 1979, and the ---------- - ~ooleun~rITneisf~ ~ditioo - Sud](e TArel:lgA is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,O, page 24 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 ,1:5' 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0218 Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan. As a minimum, the developer shall demonstrate that incorporation of energy conservation measures already committed to and those measures to be incorporated by the requirement of Condition 51 below has reduced projected energy demand by 20 percent below that demand which would have occurred without incorporation of the measures. 51. The developer shall incorporate each of the 17 energy saving methods outlined in the ENERGY section discussion of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's Assessment Report for The Reserve Development of Regional Impact unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council that individually each method is not cost effective, . TRANSPORTATION 52. No building permits shall be issued after the effective date of the Development Order (the earlier of two dates if separate Development Orders are issued by St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie) for the Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the necessary right-of-way owned by Callaway Land & Cattle Company along the westerly extension of Prima Vista Boulevard has been dedicated free and clear of all liens and encumbrances to St. Lucie County or Florida Department of Transportation as necessary and consistent with the St. Lucie County Thoroughfare Plan for Prima Vista Boulevard, and intersections thereof, and as necessary to provide for ultimate laneage of Prima Vista Boulevard. 53. Prima Vista Boulevard, west of 1-95, shall be designed as a primary public access route extefriùir Ig from the 1-9'5 interchange to ììle wesUsouthwest propeliyiìnes uf The Re~e ve .. Development of Regional Impact, and appropriate right-of-way shall be dedicated to provide for such an alignment. Design and construction of the roadway shall maintain acceptable levels of service on both Prima Vista Boulevard and 1-95 and meet the requirements of the Florida Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. .' . 53A, Within the Reserve Commerce Center, industrial land use may be exchanged for the following altemate land uses, so long as the total pm peak hour, peak direction traffic, impact from all uses within the Reserve Commerce Center does not exceed the current approved traffic impact attributable to industrial development: - - - - - - - - - - - Dõubie undërITne is fõr ãdditiõñ - - - Stri]te Tkrsti!B is for deletion -------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 9B-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O, Page 25 PRINT DATE: 08/1B/98 e 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 'n ¿2 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 1 2 3 4 5 6 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0219 . ·.·...................M~~!.fii~'~:¡·.¡.:¡!!.:.¡····..·:..:.. ,. ..'...-.,..........'-..','...........,.. .:......·..:~~~~K.'·. ..·····¡.:¡ÓìJR·TRIP$ Industrial 1,200,000 sq ft (currenU approved through Phase III) 8,800 1,557 Retirement Hme 400 beds 1,060 197 484 4,522 113 9 39 475 Nursing Home 72 beds ACLF 225 beds Medical Center 120,000 sq ft 53B. Following approval of the development order modification necessary to permit the location of the public access road from the 1-95 interchange north through The Reserve Commerce Center connecting to Glades Cut-Off Road, the developer shall immediately commence survey, design and permitting work for the construction of the road. The road shall be constructed within two years after approval of the amended Development Order modification. This period may be extended due to delays in permitting and approval by action of the governing bodies of the City of Port St. Lucie and St. Lucie County approving a written request for extension from the developer; however, the road shall be constructed and open to the public within one year after receiving all permits for its construction. No building permits for any residential development associated with the fourth golf course shall be issued until the road is completed. 54. - "'.. - .. -'. . :." . No building permits for nón-industriafdevèlop'ment of more than 225 residential (1395 daily trips) units shall be issued for The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the construction of intersection improvements to obtain the following configuration, including signalization or signalization modification as warranted by city, county, or state criteria, as applicable. a) First stage 1-95/Prima Vista Boulevard interchange b) Prima Vista Boulevard and West Peacock Boulevard Northbound West Peacock Blvd, One left-turn lane** ~-One through lane** One right-turn lane** Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane* One through lane One through/right-turn lane ---------- - ~~leUn&rrrneisf~ ~d~ioo - ÐEriJ£e 1'ÀreligÀ is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 9B-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 26 PRINT DATE: OB/18/98 · 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 ~ 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 !6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ---3-8 39 40 41 42 55A. OR BOOK :1..169 PAGE 0220 Southbound West Peacock Blvd, One left-turn lane* One through lane One right-turn lane* Westbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane* Two through lanes One right-turn lane* * Intersection improvements beyond current configuration. ** Only required if development access exists. All above configurations shall be permitted and constructed in accordance with city, county, or State criteria, as applicable. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for non- industrial development ofmOré than 225 residential units (1395 Daily Trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the intersection improvements under a) and b) above have been completed. No building permits shall be issued for The Reserve Development of Regional Impact after January 5, 1996, until an acceptable clean and irrevocable Letter of Credit, or other form of funding or security acceptable to St. Lucie County, is provided to St. Lucie County in a sufficient amount to design, permit, and construct intersection signalization at West Midway Road and Glades Cut-Off Road, No Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued in The Reserve Development of Regional Impact after June 30, 1996, until the intersection of West Midway Road and Glades Cut-Off Road is signalized. "Sufficient amount" shall be determined by an engineer's Projection of Probable Cost supplied by the developer and approved by the County Engineer. i,.. '_' _....... ......... '..' a) West Midway Road and Glades Cut-Off Road Northbound Glades Cut-Off Road One left-turn lane· One through lane One right-turn lane" Eastbound West Midway Road One left-turn lane· One through lane One right-turn lane" Southbound Glades Cut-off Road One left-turn lane· One through/right-turn lane Westbound West Midway Road One left-turn lane· One through lane One right-turn lane· * Improvements beyond current configuration. All above configuration, including signalization as warranted, shall be permitted and constructed in accordance with city, county, or state criteria, as applicable. - - - - - - - - - - - DõubIe undërITne is fÕÏ- ãdditioo - - - S~rille Tkretl.!!ft is for deletion -------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 27 PRINT DATE: OB/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ".5 6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 558. 55C. OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0221 No building pennits shall be issued for more than 448 (2,778 daily trips) residential units and 95,000 square feet of industrial development (526 daily trips) or after twelve (12) months from the effective date of this Development Order unless the improvements listed under a) above have been let for construction, No building pennits for non-industrial development of more than 800 residential units (4250 daily trips) and 95,000 square feet of industrial development (526 daily trips) or after December 31, 1996, whichever occurs first, shall be issued for The Reserve Development of Regional Impact unless the following intersection improvements, as needed to provide Level of Service "0" peak season conditions, are contained in the current year of the Five Year Capital Improvement Program, or contracts have let been let for their construction. In order to permit further development in the Reserve Commerce Center, 1,000 square feet òf industrial use in the park may be substituted for each of 11 residéi1tiäíunits, provided that the total daily trip generation does not exceed 4,776 trips. a) West Midway Road and Glades Cut-off Road Northbound Glades Cut-off Road One left-turn lane· One through lane One right-turn lane· Eastbound West Midway Road One left-turn lane· One through lane One right-turn lane* Southbound Glades Cut-off Road One left-turn lane· One through/right-turn lane Westbound West Midway Road One left-turn lane* One through lane One riê; it-ttAj ,,"lane· .... t·... ~ . .. * Improvements beyond current configuration. All above configuration, including signalization modifications, shall be permitted and constructed in accordance with city, county, or state criteria, as applicable. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for more than 95,000 square feet of inØustriar - development (526 daily trips) and 800 residential units (4,250 daily trips), or some combination thereof in accordance with this condition (not exceeding 4,776 daily trips) in the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve, or after December 31, 1996, whichever occurs first, until the intersection improvements cited above needed to provjde Level of Service "0" peak season'1::onditions have been completed or are included in the current year of the St. Lucie County Capital Improvements Program. Commencing in January 1997, the developer shall undertake an bi-annual traffic monitoring program at the intersection of West Midway Road and Glades Cut-Of Road. This program ---------- - ~~leUn~rrrneisf~ ~dfiioo - St!!'i](e TA!!'8tt!ß is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 9B-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 28 PRINT DATE: OB/1B/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0222 shall be conducted during the months of January through March. The following analysis shall be preformed on an annual basis until all of the improvements identified in Condition Number 556 above have been implemented: 1. Perform AM and PM peak hour turning movement counts for one hundred and twenty (120) minutes during each period to capture the maximum sixty (60) minutes peak period. These counts shall include truck counts and shall be preformed in fifteen (15) minute increments. 2. Perform a capacity analysis of each peak hour to determine existing level of service at the intersection for both AM and PM peak hours. 3. Forecastiraffic demands for each turning movement using background traffic as well as projected development within The Reserve for two..years. 4. Perform capacity analysis using the forecasted AM and PM peak hour turning movements to determine future level of service. 5, Identify improvements necessary at the intersection to provide Level of Service "0" during peak hour conditions and the month and year (exceedance date) when the improvements will be needed, if the intersection is projected to exceed Level of Service "0". ,. .:;, When an exceedance date is determined, building permits shall not be issued after the construction date until the needed improvements are let for construction. The construction <" . date is dcftòìed a~six (G) mORths·p¡ior to the e¡'wc::!~:ìCC dûtc. De~;gi1 and pcrr.ì:tti~g of these improvements must be complete by the construction date. When an exceedance date is determined, Certificates of Occupancy shall not be issued after the exceedance date until the improvements are completed. This condition is valid until the improvements identified in Condition 556 have been implemented. This annual monitoring report shall be submitted with the annual report required under Part E, of this Resolution. --56. No building permits for non-industrial development shall be issued for more than 1,ÕOO_ residential units (6,073 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the construction of intersection improvements to obtain the following configuration, including signalization or signalization modification as warranted by city, county or state criteria, as applicable. ---------- - ~~leUn~rITneisf~ ~dfiioo - ÐtriJte 'I'krs\t!A is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,O, Page 29 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 21)' 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 58. OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0223 a) Prima Vista Boulevard and Bayshore Boulevard Northbound Bavshore Blvd. One left-turn lane One through/right-turn lane Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd, One left-turn lane One through lane One right-turn lane Southbound Bavshore Boulevard One right-turn lane* One through lane One left-turn lane Westbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane One through/right-turn lane * Inte!se..2!!on improvements beyond--Gufrent configuration. All above configurations shall be permitted and constructed in accordance with city, county, or State criteria, as applicable. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for non- industrial development of more, than 1,000 residential units (6,073 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the intersection improvements under a) above have been completed. 57. No building permits shall be issued for industrial development within the Reserve Commerce Center generating more than 250,000 (1,383 daily trips) square feet of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following roadway improvements, including all necessary bridge structures (development level thresholds may be increasec.i if it is dtml'Or\strated through the (raffic monitoring'lJi'ogram tl1ë:1t au'-c.iitional development may be accommodated without exceeding level of Serve "0" peak hour, peak season, or level of Service "C" under average annual daily conditions): a) Four-lane West Midway Road from 1-95 to Oleander Avenue. No Certificates of Occupancy for industrial development within the Reserve Commerce Center generating more than 250,000 (1,383 daily trips) square feet of The Reserve - Development of Regional Impact shall be issued until the roadway improvement under (a) above has been completed (development level thresholds may be increased if it is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that additional development may be accommodated without exceeding level of Service "0" peak hour, peak season, or level of Service "C" under average annual daily conamons). No building permits shall be issued for industrial development within the Reserve Commerce Center generating more than 250,000 (1,383 daily trips) square feet of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following roadway ---------- - ~~leun~rrrnëisf~ ~drrioo - Stri]¡e Tft!'e~!'ft is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 30 PRINT DATE: 08/1B/98 ..~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 r ù 27 28 29 30 59, 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0224 improvements including all necessary bridge structures (development level thresholds may be increased 'if it is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that additional development may be accommodated without exceeding Level of Serve "D" peak hour, peak season, or Level of Service tIC" under average annual daily conditions): a) West Midway Road and South 25th Street (S1. James Drive) Northbound South 25th S1. One left-turn lane One through lane One right-turn lane* Eastbound West Midway Road One left-turn lane* One through lane Secondthroughlane* One right-turn lane* -----Southbound South 25th S1. One left-turn lane Second left-turn lane* One through lane One right-turn lane* Westbound West Midway Road One left-turn lane One through lane Second through lane* One right-turn lane * Improvement beyond current configuration. No Certificates of Occupancy for industrial development within the Reserve Commerce Center generating more than 250,000 (1,383 daily trips) square feet of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact shall be issued until the roadway improvement under a) above has been completed (development level thresholds may be increased if it is demonstrc¡ted through the traffic monlto¡-Íi ìg pro~i'am that adGmvr:~: -de'JsIOpmGíit may be accommodated without exceeding Level of Service "D" peak hour, peak season, or Level of Service "C" under average annual daily conditions). No building permits shall be issued for non-industrial development of more than 1,494 residential units (9,073 daily trips), a 150-room hotel (1,261 daily trips), 65,000 square feet of commercial (5,616 daily trips), and 30,000 square feet of office (556 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the f~lIowing - roadway improvements, including all necessary bridge structures (development level thresholds may be increased if it is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that additional development can be accommodated without exceeding level of Service "D" peak hour, peak season, or level of Service tIC" under average annual daily conditions): a) Six lane Prima Vista Boulevard from 1-95 to West Peacock Boulevard. b) Four-lane Prima Vista Boulevard from Cashmere Boulevard to Bayshore Boulevard. ---------- - ~~eun~rUneisf~ ~d~ioo - Ð~ri1te Tftreli!ß is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 9B-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 31 PRINT DATE: OB/1B/98 .' 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ?5 , ... ~o . 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0225 No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for non- industrial development of more than 1,494 residential units (9,073 daily trips), a 150-room hotel (1,261 daily trips), 65,000 square feet of commercial (5,616 daily trips), and 30,000 square feet of office (556 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the roadway improvements under a) and b) above have been completed. 60. No building permits shall be issued for non-industrial development of more than 1,494 residential units (9,073 daily trips), a 150-room hotel (1,261 daily trips), 65,000 square feet of commercial (5,616 daily trips), and 30,000 square feet of office (556 daily trips) of the Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following intersection improvements, including signalization modifications as warranted by city, county, or state criteria, as applicable (development level of thresholds may be increased if it is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program-that additional development can be accommodated without exceeding Level of Service "0" peak hour, peak season, or Level of Service "C" under average annual daily conditions): a) West Peacock Boulevard and Prima Vista Boulevard Northbound West Peacock Blvd. One left-turn lane** One through lane** One right-turn lane** Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane* One through lane Second through lane One throughlright-tum lane* Southbound West Peacock Blvd. .. ,,- One left,·1üm lana One through lane One right-turn lane Westbound Prima Vista Blvd. OnÐ left-'tüm lanc** Two through lanes Third through lane* One right-turn lane b) 1-95 and Prima Vista Boulevard (1) Add two-lane parallel structure. (2) Northbound - one right-turn lane. (3) Southbound - one right-turn lane. (4) Southbound - second left-turn lane. * Intersection improvements beyond current configuration. ** _ Only required if development access exists. All of the above configurations shall be permitted and constructed in accordance with city, ---------- - ~u~eun~rITneisf~~ditioo- Strilte Tars\I!a is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 32 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~ 6 _0.- . 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0226 county, or State criteria, as applicable, No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for any non- industrial development of more than 1,494 residential units (9,073 daily trips), a 150-room hotel (1,261 daily trips), 65,000 square feet of commercial (5,616 daily trips), and 30,000 square feet of office (556 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the improvements under (a) and (b) above have been completed, 61, No building permits shall be issued for non-industrial development of more than 1,494 residential units (9,073 daily trips), a 150-room hotel (1,261 daily trips), 65,000 square feet of commercial (5,616 daily trips), and 30,000 square feet of office (556 daily trips) of the Reserve Development of RegionaUmpact until contracts have been let for the following intersection improvements, including signalization modifications as warranted by city, county, or state-criteria, as applicable (development level of thresholds may be increased if it is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that additional development can be accommodated without exceeding Level of Service "D" peak hour, peak season, or Level of Service "C" under average annual daily conditions): a) Bayshore Boulevard and Prima Vista Boulevard Northbound Bayshore Blvd, One left-turn lane One through/right-turn lane One through lane Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane Second left-turn lane* Second through lane* One right-turn lane .... Southbound Bavshore Blvd, One left-turn lane One through lane One right-turn lane Westbound Prima Vista Blvd, One left-turn lane One through lane* One throughlright-turn lane * Intersection improvements beyond current configuration. The above configuration shall be permitted and constructed in accordance with city, county, or State criteria, as applicable. No Certificate of Occupancy shall-be-issued for any non- industrial development of more than 1,494 residential units (9,073 daily trips), a 150-room hotel (1,261 daily trips), 65,000 sqüare feet of commercial (5,616 daily trips), and 30,000 square feet of office (556 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the improvements under paragraphs (a) 'and (b) above have been completed. ---------- - ~~eun~rITneisf~ ~d~ioo - ÐtriJte Tfirst:l!8 is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final, 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 33 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 - 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ')5 6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 62. 63, OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0227 No building permits shall be issued for non-industrial development of more than 2,607 residential units (16,314 daily trips). a 250-room hotel (2,141 daily trips), 165,000 square feet of commercial (10,289 daily trips). and 61,000 square feet of office development (974 daily trips) of the Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following improvement (development level of thresholds may be increased if it is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that additional development can be accommodated without exceeding level of Service "D" peak hour, peak season, or level of Service "C" under average annual daily conditions): a) Eight-lane Prima Vista Boulevard from 1-95 to West Peacock Boulevard. b) Six-lane Prima Vista Boulevard from West Peacock Boulevard to Cashmere Boulevard. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for non- industrial development of more than 2,607 residential units (16,314 daily trips), a 250-room hotel (2,141 daily trips), 165,000 square feet of commercial (10,289 daily trips), and 61,000 square feet of office development (974 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the improvements under a) and b) above have been completed. No building permits shall be issued for non-industrial development of more than 2,607 residential units (16,314 daily trips), a 250-room hotel (2.141 daily trips), 165,000 square feet of commercial (10,289 daily trips), and 61,000 square feet of office development (974 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the construction of intersection improvements to obtain the following configuration, including '. signalízation'Ür ~iyri'Blization modification as warranted by ciiy; County or State crit~ria, as applicable. a) Prima Vista and West Peacock Boulevard Northbound West Peacock Blvd, One left-turn lane·· One through lane·· One right-turn lane·· Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd, One left-turn lane Second left4urn lane* One through lane Second through lane One through/right-turn lane Southbound West Peacock Blvd. One left-turn lane Second left-turn lane* One through lane One right-turn lane Westbound Prîma Vista Blvd, One left-turn lane** Three through lanes Fourth through lane* One right-turn lane - - - - - - - - - - - Dõubïe underline is fõi ãdditiõñ - - - S~~i)te Tß~etl.!!ft is for deletion -------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,O. Page 34 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 1.6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1.169 PAGE 0228 b) Prima Vista Boulevard and California Boulevard Northbound California Blvd, One left-turn lane Second left-turn lane* One through lane One right-turn lane Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd, One left-turn lane Second left-turn lane* Two through lanes Third through lane* One right-turn lane Southbound California Blvd, One left-turn lane One through lane One right-tum--lane Westbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane Two through lanes Third through lane* One right-turn lane c) Prima Vista Boulevard and Cashmere Boulevard Northbound Cashmere Blvd. One left-tum lane One through lane One right-turn lane Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane Third through lane* One right-turn lane Southbound Cashmere Blvd, One left-tum lane Second left-turn lane* 8ntJ{hiough lail~ -,. One right-turn lane Second right-turn lane* Westbound Prima Vista Blvd, One left-turn lane Two through lanes Ti¡ifO ltlÍ"Ougi ¡ane"- One right-turn lane d) West Midway Road and East Torino Parkway Northbound East Torino Parkway One right-turn lane One left-tum lane* Eastbound West Midway Road One through lane Second through lane* One right-turn lane* Southbound East Torino Parkway- N/A Westbound West Midway Road One left-turn lane" One through lane Second through lane* * Intersection improvements beyond current configuration. ----------- ~~eun~rITneisf~~dfiioo - ÐEri]£e 'l'arett!ft is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,O. Page 35 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 64. 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 .~6 27 28 29 65. 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37- 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0229 ** Only required if development access exists. Nt A = not applicable All above configurations shall be permitted and constructed in accordance with city, county or State criteria, as applicable. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for non- industrial development of more than 2,607 residential units (16,314 daily trips), a 250-room hotel (2,141 daily trips), 165,000 square feet of commercial (10,289 daily trips), and 61,000 square feet of office development (974 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the intersection improvements under (a), (b), (c), and (d) above have been completed. ' No building permits shall be issued for non-industrial development of more than 2,607 residential units (16,314 daily trips), a 250-room hotel (2,141 daily trips), 165,000 square feet of commercial (10,289 daily trips), and 61,000 square feet of office development (974 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following improvement: a) Four-lane West Peacock Boulevard from University Boulevard to Prima Vista Boulevard. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for non- industrial development of more than 2,607 residential units (16,314 daily trips), a 250-room hotel (2,141 daily trips), 165,000 square feet of commercial (10,289 daily trips), and 61,000 square feet of office development (9-'4 'daily trips) of Trie Reservê'Oevelbpment of Regional Impact until the Intersection improvements under paragraph (a) above have been completed. No building permits shall be issued for industrial development within the Reserve Commerce Center of generating more than 8,760 Daily Trips until contracts have been let for the following improvement (development level of thresholds may be increased if it is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that additional development can b~ accommodated without exceeding level of Service "D" peak hour, peak season, or level of Service "C" under average annual daily conditions): a) Four-lane Glades Cut-off Road from Reserve Commerce Center (Go Team) entrance to West Midway Road. No' Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for development within the Reserve Commerce Center generating more than 8,760 daily trips until the improvement under paragraph (a) above has been completed. . - ~clJ1eUn~rrrneisf~ ~d~ioo - Strilte Tkrell.!ft is for deletion ---------- ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 36 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 ¿6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 66A, ô6B, OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0230 No final planned development or plat approval shall be issued after construction of the public access road from the 1-95 interchange north through The Reserve Commerce Center connecting to Glades Cut-Off Road until contracts have been let for the construction of the following intersection improvements, including signalization as warranted by city, county, or state criteria, as applicable: a} Intersection of connector road with Reserve Boulevard Northbound connector road Add left-turn lane * Add through lane * Add dual right-turn lanes * Eastbound Reserve Boulevard Add left-turn lane Add second through lane Southbound connector road Add dual left-turn lanes Add through lane * Westbound Reserve Boulevard Add dual left-turn lanes * Add second through lane Add right-turn lane * Only required if development access south of Reserve Boulevard exists. If it does not exist, the additional improvements should be required at such time as access is available. All above configuration shall be permitted and constructed in accordance with city, county, or state criteria, as applicable. ~omm-eh¡;jng the ye'ar oi' construction óf the public acces::; road frotnthe i-95 interchange north through The Reserve Commerce Center connecting to Glades Cut-Off Road, signal warrant studies shall be conducted during the peak season at the intersections identified below under a} through d}. As such time as the signal warrant analysis identifies the need to install a signal(s}, no building permits shall be issued after 120 days after such determination by St. Lucie County or FDOT as applicable until contracts have been let for the installation of the traffic signal/signals in accordance with City, County, or state criteria, as applicable. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the traffic signal(s} identified in the signal warrant study has/have been installed and in operation. This condition applies to the following intersections: a} Intersection of connector road with Glades Cut-Off Road, b} Intersection of connector road with Reserve Boulevard, c} Intersection of Prima Vista Boulevard with 1-95 Northbound Off Ramp, and, ---------- - ~~eUn~rrrneisf~~dfiioo- Stri]¡e Tkrsti!!ft is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,O. Page 37 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 '15 ..;6 .' 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1..169 PAGE 0231 d) Intersection of Prima Vista Boulevard with 1-95 Southbound Off Ramp. The signal warrant analysis is to be performed periodically as requested by St. Lucie County but no more frequently than annually, If the connector road cannot be designed to fit within the 100 foot right-of-way due to horizontal alignment requirements, the developer shall dedicate such additional right-of-way as may be necessary to meet those design requirements, 67. No building permits shall be issued for development of more than 3,400 residential units (19,411 daily trips), residential units, a 250-room hotel (2141 daily trips), 250,000 square feet of--GGl1lmercial (13,480 daily trips), 100,000 square feet of office (1,372 daily trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of industrial development (5524 daily trips) ef----TAe Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following improvements: a) Four-lane Torino Parkway from East Torino Parkway to Florida's Turnpike. b) Interchange at Torino Parkway and Florida's Turnpike. c) Two-lane West Virginia Drive from Glades Cut-off Road to Cashmere Boulevard, including 1-95 Interchange. d) Interchange at West Virginia Drive and 1-95. e) Four-lane West Virginia Drive from Cashmere Boulevard to Bayshore Boulevard. f) Four-lane West Virginia Drive from Bayshore Boulevard to Airo~o Boulevard. g) Four-lane California Boulevard from South Peacock Boulevard to West Virginia Drive, h) Two-lane California Boulevard from North Peacock Boulevard to West Torino Parkway. I) Two-lane California Boulevard from South Peacock Boulevard to North Peacock Boulevard. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for development of more than 3;mIT residential units (19,411 daily trips), a 250-room hotel (2141 daily trips), 250,000 square feet of commercial (13,480 daily trips), 100,000 square feet of office (1,372 daily trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of industrial development (5524 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the improvements under paragraphs (a) through (I) ---------- - ~~eUn~rnneisf~ ~ditioo - £t~i][e Tkre\1!fl. is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 38 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 ~6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK ~169 PAGE 0232 above have been completed. 68, No building permits shall be issued for development of more than 3,400 residential units (19,411 daily trips), a 250-room hotel, (2141 daily trips), 250,000 square feet of commercial (13,480 daily trips), 100,000 square feet of office (1,372 daily trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of industrial development (5524 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following improvements (development level of thresholds may be increased if it is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that additional development can be accommodated without exceeding Level of Service "D" peak hour, peak season, or Level of Service "C" under average annual daily conditions): a) Eight-lane Prima Vista Boulevard fro..l'1'!_ yvest Peacock Boulevard to California Boulevard. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for development of more than 3,400 residential units (19,411 daily trips), a 250-room hotel (2141 daily trips), 250,000 square feet of commercial (13,480 daily trips), 100,000 square feet of office (1,372 daily trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of industrial development (5524 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the improvements under a) above has been completed. 69, No building permits shall be issued for development of more than 3,400 residential units (19,411 daily trips), a 250- room hotel (2141 daily trips), 250,000 square feet of commercial (13,480 daily trips), 100,000 square feet of office (1,372 daily trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of industrial development (5524 daily trips), of The Reserve Development of Regional impact untii contracts have-baên-Iet for tj-¡ê"(,I,j/lstructiol1 of intersection improvements to obtain the following configuration, including signalization or signalization modification as warranted by city, county, or State criteria, as applicable: a) California Boulevard and North Peacock Boulevard Northbound California Blvd. One left-turn lane* One through/right-turn lane Eastbound North Peacock Blvd. One left-turn lane* One through/right-turn lane Southbound California Blvd. One left-turn lane* One through/right-turn lane - Westbound North Peacock Blvd, -.One approach lane ---------- - ~~eün~rITneisf~~d~ioo- StE'i]£e TRE'eti!R is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 39 PRINT DATE: OB/1B/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 --D- 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ss- 39 AO 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0233 b) Prima Vista Boulevard and California Boulevard Northbound California Blvd, Two left-turn lanes One through lane Secondthroughlane* One right-turn lane Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd, Two left-turn lanes Three through lanes Fourth through lane* One right-turn lane Southbound California Blvd. One left-turn lane Two through lanes -º-ne right-turn lane Westbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane Second left-turn lane* Three through lanes Fourth through lane* One through/right-turn lane c) West Virginia Drive and Glades Cut-off Road Northbound Glades Cut-off Road One approach lane Eastbound West Virginia Drive N/A Southbound Glades Cut-off Road One approach lane Westbound West Virainia Drive One approach lane* d) West Virginia Drive and California Boulevard Northbound Ca:ifomia Doulevard One left-turn lane* One through/right-turn lane :::a3t~ound '."'est Virainj¿:;, D:-:','<: One left-turn lane* One through lane* One right-turn lane* Southbound California Blvd. One left-turn lane* One throughlright-turn lane Westbound West Virainia Drive One left-turn lane* One through lane* One right-turn lane* e) West Virginia Drive and Cashmere Boulevard Northbound Cashmere Blvd. One through/right-turn lane Eastbound West Virainia Drive Two through lanes* One right-turn lane* ---------- - ~u~eun~rnneisf~~dfiioo- Ðtri(e Tare\i!ft is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 9B-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,O. Page 40 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0234 Southbound Cashmere Blvd. Two left-turn lanes' One through/right-turn lane Westbound West Virainia Drive One left-turn lane' Two through lanes' One right-turn lane' f) West Virginia Drive and Airoso Boulevard Northbound Airoso Boulevard One approach lane Eastbound West Virainia Drive One left-turn lane' Two through lanes' One right-turn lane' Southbound Airoso Blvd.__ One approach lane Westbound West Virainia Drive One left-turn lane' Two through lanes' One right-turn lane' g) West Virginia Drive and Bayshore Boulevard Northbound Bayshore Blvd. One left-turn lane' One through/right-turn lane Eastbound West Virainia Drive One left-turn lane' Two through lanes' One right-turn lane' Southbound Bayshore Blvd. One fert-turn lane" One through/right turn lane Westbound West Virainia Drive , 'ùne left-turrnant::' . Two through lanes' One right-turn lane' h) West Torino Parkway and Torino Parkway Northbound West Torino Parkway One approach lane Eastbound Torino Parkway N/A Southbound West Torino Parkway One left-turn lane' One through lane Westbound Torino Parkway One approach lane . Intersection improvements beyond current configuration. N/A = not applicable ---------- - ~clJ1eun~rrrneisf~~dfiioo- £:triJ£e Tkreu!!ft is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 41 PRINT DATE: OB/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 70, 12 13 -14 15 16 17 18 19 71. 20 21 22 72. 23 24 ~5 ~6 ~, 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 _38 3'9 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0235 All above configurations shall be permitted and constructed in accordance with city, county, or state criteria, as applicable. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for development of more than 3,400 residential units (19,411 daily trips), a 250-room hotel (2141 daily trips), 250,000 square feet of commercial (13,480 daily trips), 100,000 square feet of office (1,372 daily trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of industrial development (5524 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the intersection improvements under paragraphs (a) through (h) above, have been completed. All project entrance intersection configurations shall maintain Council's objective level of service standards. AILproject entrance intersection configurations, including any Florida East Coast Railway crossings at Glades Cut-off Road/Reserve Boulevard and at Glades Cut-o~ Road/Reserve Commerce Center (Go Team) entrance, shall be approved as appropriate by . the City of Port S1. Lucie, S1. Lucie County, Florida Department of Transportation, and the Florida East Coast Railway. A copy of approved project entrance intersection configuration shall be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. As a minimum, the Developer shall pay a fair share contribution consistent with the road impact fee ordinance of S1. Lucie County. Intersection improvements identified in paragraph (a) below shall be constructed concurrent with the southerly connection of Cashmere Boulevard to Prima Vista Boulevard. a} Prima Vista Boulevard and Cashmere Boulevard Northbound Cashmere Blvd, One left-turn lane* One right-turn lane* Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd, Two through lanes One right-turn lane* southbound Cashmere Blvd, N/A Westbound Prima Vista Blvd, One left-turn lane* Two through lanes * Improvements beyond current configuration. N/A = not applicabJe-- No further building permits for non-industrial development shall be issued in The Reserve after the southerly connection of Cashmere Boulevard to Prima Vista Boulevard is open to traffic until the improvements under paragraph (a) above have been completed. ---------- - ~~eün~rnnëisf~ ~drrioo - Gtri]te Tkre~!ft is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,O. Page 42 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 ... 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 ;b 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK :1169 PAGE 0236 73, No building permits shall be issued for development of more than 3,400 residential units (19,411 daily trips), a 250- room hotel (2141 daily trips), 250,000 square feet of commercial (13,480 daily trips), 100,000 square feet of office (1,372 daily trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of industrial development (5524 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following improvements: a) Prima Vista Boulevard and California Boulevard Northbound California Blvd, One left-turn lane· One through lane· One right-turn lane· Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane· Two through lanes One right-turn 1é!1}(i}~ Southbound California Blvd, One left-turn lane· One through lane· One right-turn lane· Westbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane· Two through lanes One right-turn lane· . Improvements beyond current configuration. No Certificates of.Occupancy shall be issued for any non- industrial development of more than 3,400 residential units (19,411 daily trips), a 250-room hotel (2141 daily trips), 250,000 square feet of commercial (13,480 daily trips), 100,000 square feet of 'office (1,372 daily trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of industrial development (5524 daily trips), of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the improvements under paragraph (a) above have been comµleteå. 74. Intersection improvements identified in a) below shall be constructed concurrent with the northerly connection of Cashmere Boulevard to Prima Vista Boulevard. a) Prima Vista Boulevard and Cashmere Boulevard Northbound Cashmere Blvd. One left-turn lane One through lane· One right-turn lane Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd, One left-turn lane· Two through lanes One right-turn lane Southbound Cashmere Blvd. One left-turn lane One through lane One right-turn lane· ~estbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane Two through lanes One right-turn lane ---------- - ~~eun~rilneisf~ ~d~ioo - St~i](e TR~eti!!ft is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q. Page 43 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 2b 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK J...169 PAGE 0237 * Improvements beyond current configuration, No further building permits for non-industrial development shall be issued in The Reserve after the northerly connection of Cashmere Boulevard to Prima Vista Boulevard is open to traffic until the improvements under a) above have been completed. 75. Commencing in January of 1990, the Developer may undertake an bi-annual monitoring program. The traffic monitoring program shall be conducted by a traffic engineering firm that is qualified by the Florida Department of Transportation in F(3.05), Traffic Operation Studies, and G(3.06), Traffic Operation Design, or an equivalent. If the monitoring program is selected, it must be commenced in January, 1989 arid ----maintained on an annual basis. The developer shall submit to the County a traffic monitori.'.lg_ report along with The Reserve's Annual Development Report. The report shall present existing counts and traffic conditions, including all analysis, specifying any improvements necessary to provide Level of Service "C" for annual average daily traffic conditions and Level of Service "0" for peak season peak hour conditions. The report will identify any exceedance and construction dates as defined herein. Monitoring of each roadway segment listed in Tables I and II may be discontinued when all related improvements to that roadway segment have been completed. The monitoring program for all roadway links shall end at the completion of the Reserve's development (Year 2008). The report will be submitted to all agencies which receive the annual report. The City of Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie County and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council shall review and approve the monitoring report and its findings. The program may monitor any or all "of tiTli'roaùway iinks iisted in Tables land Ii. A two-day, mid-week, twenty-four hour (hourly recording) count shall be made on each link. Commencing in January of 1991, the monitoring program will project traffic demands for each link using historical traffic growth data from the monitoring program and considering projected development within The Reserve, Forecasts will be made for a three-year period. When a link is projected to exceed its existing service volume for Level of Service "C" or "0" during the three-year period, the month and year for such exceedance will be estimated'- (exceedance date). a. Building permits for non-industrial development in excess of the levels shown in Table I-may be issued for The Reserve if it is shown in the Traffic Monitoring Program that Level of Service "C" for annual average daily traffic and Level 0[- Service "0" for peak season, peak hour traffic can be maintained with additional Reserve development. When an exceedance date is determined, building permits for development shall not ---------- - ~~eun~rrrneisf~ ~d~iœ - Ðtril[e Tsrsti!s is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.C, Page 44 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 '15 ~6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0238 be issued after the construction date until the needed improvement is let for construction, The construction date is defined as twelve (12) months prior to the exceedance date for roadway improvements and eighteen (18) months prior to the exceedance date for bridge improvements. Design and permitting of these improvements must be completed by the construction date. When an exceedance date is determined, Certificates of Occupancy shall not be issued after the exceedance date until the improvement is complete, b. Building permits for industrial development in excess of the levels shown in Table II may be issued for The Reserve if it is shown in the Traffic Monitoring Program that Level of Service "C" for annual average daily traffic and Level of Service "[)"'f()F'peàk season, peak hour traffic can be maintained with additional Reserve development. When an exceedance date is determined, building permits for development shall not be issued after the construction date until the needed improvement is let for construction. The construction date is defined as twelve (12) months prior to the exceedance date for roadway improvements and eighteen (18) months prior to the exceedance date for bridge improvements. Design and permitting of these improvements must be completed by the construction date. ~ When an exceedance date is determined, Certificates of Occupancy shall not be issued after the exceedance date until the improvement is complete. 76. Commencing in January, 1990, the developer may undertake an annual monitoring program of tÌle ¡::95iPrima Vista Boulevard interchange. The traffi~ monitoring' programshail be' conducted by a traffic engineering firm that is qualified by FDOT in F(3.05) - Traffic Operation Studies and G(3.06) - Traffic Operation Design or an equivalent. If the monitoring program is selected, it must be commenced in January, 1990 and maintained on an annual basis. The developer shall submit to the City of Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie County and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council a traffic monitoring report along with The Reserve's Annual Development Report. The report shall present ßxisting-- counts and traffic conditions, including all analysis, specifying any improvements necessary to provide Level of Service "C" for annual average daily traffic conditions and Level of Service "0" for peak season peak hour conditions. The report will identify any exceedance and construction dates as defined herein. This monitoring program shall include AM and PM peak hour tuming'movement counts for one hundred twenty (120) minutes to capture the maximum sixty minutes at both interchange exit ramp intersections. ---------- - ~~eun~rrrneisf~~d~ioo- Strilte TRr8kt!Jft is for deletion ---------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,Q, Page 45 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 !G 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0239 Commencing two years from the opening of the interchange. the monitoring program will project traffic demands for each turning movement using the historical traffic growth data from the monitoring program and considering projected development with The Reserve. Forecasts will be made for a three-year period. Critical movement capacity analysis of these intersections shall be performed using the projected AM and PM traffic volumes. The analysis shall be based'upon criteria relating to operation and design as set forth in Transportation Research Circular No. 212, "Interim Materials on Highway Capacity," January, 1980. When either intersection is projected to exceed its capacity for Level of Service "C" or OlD" during the three-year period, the month and year for such exceedance will be estimated (exceedance date). . (TEXT OF THIS CONDITION IS CONTINUED ON PAGE 46) ----------- ~~eUn~rrrneisf~~ditioo E;l';ri][e Tsreklgs is for deletion ----------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D,O. Page 46 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0240 ~ .. CI 0 - v 0 ~,~ 0 I(' I(' 0 I(' 0 I(' \I:) \I:) v \I:) I(' ..¿ .,; .,; ..¿ .,; \1:)' !-!- - ... ... .., ... 0 U~ 0 0 0 8 0 8 ..."'" 0 0 0 0 5' q q q ö q 0 :õ - 0 :õ ö .., \I:) - .., ~ .., .., .., .., .., DO DO DO DO DO .., .., .., .., .., .. ~ - - - .~ 0 0 0 0 'i. Ë~ 0 CI 8 8 & 8 0 0 0 S E . 0 .,; ö .,; 0 I(' .,; 0 .,; \I:) \I:) I(' co \I:) --? u \I:) - ... .. '.6 0 ~ 8 0 8 - ~~ 8 0 8 c:: ô 0 ô ô ö CII I(' I(' I(' I(' I(' E ü ... ... ... ... ... CII Õ ~ 1m ¡,. 0 0 0 0 0 0 E I(' I(' I(' I(' I(' I(' - ... ... ... ... - = 0 .c - ~ I ...¡ ...¡ ...¡ ...¡ ...¡ - ] ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. ..,. c CII ë E u :g~ ..,. t"- t"- o t"- v 0- 0 0 0 0 0- .. ....,E r: 'c v. \I:) \I:) v \I:) v, CII ~.p¡ Ñ Ñ M" Ñ ,;; ~ CII ~ E J ::I '¡ E '0 .¡< ~ . ...¡ ...¡ ...¡ ...¡ ...¡ ...¡ '0 ~ > > ~ ... ti '0 i:Q i:Q u ,C ~ -ci -ci -ci -ci ....J '0 '¡; I .>I > > > > ~ <U Ü U U g g i:Q ãi ãi ãi ~ (5 en V5 Õ ~ u U > '" Ë I .>I > > I(' '0 -. . I::: ~'O ... Ë'; - '0 U'O ... <U '0 <U 'I: 0 u 0 .!! 0 ø..a:I ~IX: o IX: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 .b 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0241 Building permits for non-industrial development in excess of 1,494 residential units (9,073 daily trips), a 150-room hotel (1,261 daily trips), 65,000 square feet of commercial (5,616 daily trips), and 30,000 square feet of office (556 daily trips) of office may be issued for The Reserve if it is shown in the Traffic Monitoring Program that Level of Service "C" for annual average daily traffic and Level of Service "0" for peak season, peak hour traffic can be maintained with additional Reserve development. When an exceedance date is determined, building permits shall not be issued after the construction date until the needed improvement is let for construction, The construction date is defined as eighteen (18) months prior to the exceedance date for bridge improvements. Design and permitting of these improvements must be completed by the construction date. a. Addition of a two-lane pª-!,ªIJel structure. b, Northbound right-turn lane. c, Southbound right-turn lane. d. Second southbound left-turn lane.When an exceedance date is determined, Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued after the exceedance date until the improvement is complete. 77. No final planned development or plat approval shall be issued for phase IV unless a traffic study has been conducted by the Developer, submitted to and approved by the City of Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie County, Florida Department of Transportation, and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, which demonstrates that the regional roadway network can accommodate a specified amount of additional Reserve Development of Regional Impact generated traffic and growth in background traffic beyond 2005 and can still be maintained at Level of Service "C" during average annual daily traffic conditions and Level of Service "0" dUring peak hour, peak seasón conditions:' 8Ul;h StUdy may be rèquested by ::)t. L.ucie County prior to phase IV, but after January 1, 1995. The traffic study shall: a) identify the improvements and timing of those improvements necessary to provide Level of Service "C" under average annual daily operating conditions and Level of Service "0" under peak hour, peak season operating conditions for the subject transportation network during the projected completion of the project, including project impacts and growth in background traffic. -- Additional final planned development or plat shall not be issued until a new project phasing program and roadway improvement program necessary to maintain acceptable levels of servjce1lave been approved by the City of Port St. Lucie,. St. Lucie County, Florida Department of Transportation, and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council for the remainder of the development. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition St~i]Ee tRr81i!ß is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-~00 Final - 6h Amendment to D,Q, Page 48 PRINT DATE: 08/~8/9B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ')5 ¿6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0242 HOUSING 78. Prior to application for building permits for any hotel, commercial, industrial, or residential development in The Reserve Development of Regional Impact beyond that authorized in the Preliminary Development Agreement, the developer shall provide an estimate of the number of permanent jobs that will be created within the project boundaries at buildout and during occupancy of each project phase. This estimate of total permanent employment generated shall be broken down by salary range and compared with the affordability of residential units which have been or will be constructed prior to buildout of that phase or previous phases under review. In addition, the developer shall conduct a housing study to determine the minimum distance from The Reserve Development of Regional Impact where an adequaJe supply of housing which is affordable to all persons working in The Reserve Development of Regional Impact is located. This housing study will examine the location and costs of this housing and will include a plan for the provision of affordable housing should there not be enough supply in the vicinity. The developer may create more permanent employment than housing opportunities for employees, but shall not construct any housing which is not affordable to employees of businesses within the project boundaries until such time as affordable housing opportunities in the vicinity of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact have been provided for all employment created in that phase of development. Consistency of development plans with this intent must be determined by the City of Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie County. and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council prior to the issuance of building permits for any development beyond that authorized by the Preliminary Development Agreement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, as follows: B, The legal description for the property under this amended Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval, is as follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A C, Any modifications or deviations from the approved plans or requirements of this Development Order shall be submitted to the St. Lucie County Community Development Director and the Port St. Lucie City Planner, as appropriate. for a determination by the Board -of Cqunty Commissioners of St. Lucie County/City Council of the City of Port St. Lucie. as to whether the change constitutes a substantial deviation as provided in Section 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, The Board of Commissioners of St. Lucie County/City Council of the City of Port St. Lucie, as appropriate. shall make its determination - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition EÈl!i][e U!.l!e~!!fl. is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D.O. Page 49 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 ~6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0243 of substantial deviation at a public hearing after notice to the developer. D. St. Lucie County/the City of Port St. Lucie shall monitor the development of the project to ensure compliance with this Development Order, The St. Lucie County Community Development Director and/or the City of Port St. Lucie City Planner, as appropriate, shall be the local official assigned the responsibility for monitoring the development and enforcing the terms of the Development Order. The Community Development Director/City Planner may require periodic reports of the developer with regard to any item set forth in this Development Order. E. The developer shall make an annual report as required by Section 380,06(18), Florida Statutes, The annual report shall be submitted each year on the anniversary date of the adoption, of Resolution 89- 73, or the earlier date if two separate orders are adopted, of this amended Development Òrder and shall inclu~.!! the following: 1, Any changes in the plan of development, or in the representations contained in the Application for Development Approval, or in the phasing for the reporting year and for the next year; 2, A summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the year; 3, Undeveloped tracts of land that have been sold, transferred, or leased to a successor developer; 4, Identification and intended use of lands purchased, leased, or optioned by the developer adjacent to the original site since the Devëlopment Oreer was issued; 5, An assessment of the developer's and local govemment's compliance with the conditions of approval contained in this Development Order and the commitments specified in the Application for Development Approval and summarized in the Regional Planning Council Assessment Report for the development undertaken; 6. Any request for a substantial deviation determination that was filed in the reportingyear or is anticipated to be filed during the next year; 7. An indication of a change, if any, in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the Development Order was issued; 8. A list of significant local, State, and federal permits which have been obtained or which are pending by agency, type of permit, permit number, and purpose of each; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition ÐtriJte Eftre\i!'À is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D,Q, Page 50 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 "\5 .6 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ~ OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0244 9, The annual repert shall be transmitted to St. Lucie Ceunty, the City ef Port St. lucie, the Treasure Ceast Regienal Planning Ceuncil, the Florida Department of Community Affairs, the Flerida Department ef Natural Resources, the South Flerida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, and such additional parties as may be apprepriate er required by law; 10. A copy ef any recerded netice ef the adeptien ef a Development Order or the subsequent medificatien ef an adepted Develepment Order that was recorded by the develeper pursuant to. Subsection 380.06(15), Flerida Statutes; and 11 . Any ether infermation requested by the Beard ef Cemmissieners ef St. Lucie C~unty/City --Ceuncil ef the City of Pert St. Lucie or the St. Lucie Ceunty Community Develepm.eDt Directer/Port St. Lucie City Planner to. be included in the annual repm:-- F. The definitiens feund in Chapter 380, Flerida Statutes, shall apply to. this amended Develepment Order. G. St. Lucie Ceunty hereby agrees that prior to. March 14,2009 The Reserve Develepment of Regienal Impact shall not be subject to down zening, unit density reductien, er intensity reduction, unless the Ceunty/City, as apprepriate, demonstrates that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the appreval ef the amended Development Order have eccurred, or that the amended Develepment Order was based en substantially inaccurate infermation previded by the develeper, or that the change is clearly established by St. Lucie County/the City of Pert St. Lucie to. be essential to. the public health, safety, er welfare. H, . This amended Develepment Of"der'·shall be bindrng upön the devélòper and its assignees er successers in interest. It is understood that any reference herein to. any gevernmental agency shall be censtrued to. mean any future instrumentality which may be created and designated as successor in interest to., er which otherwise pessesses any ef the pewers and duties ef any referenced government agency in existence on the effective date ef this amended Development Order. I. The approval granted by this amended Ðevelopment Order is conditional and shall net be censtrued to obviate the duty of the developer to comply with all other applicable local, State, and federal permitting requirements. J. In the event that any portien er sectien of this amended Development Order is deemed to. be invalid, illegal, er uncenstitutienal by a court of competent jurisdictien, such decision shall in no manner affect-- the remaining portions er sections ef this amended Development Order, which shall remain in full force and effect. ' K, This amended Develepment Order shall become effective upen adoption. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition Strilte tArea!!A is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 9B-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D,O, Page 51 PRINT DATE: 08/1B/9B 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26~- 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ¡ OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0245 L. Certified copies of this amended Development Order shall be transmitted immediately by certified mail to the Department of Community Affairs, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, and Reserve Homes Lid.. L.P.. a Delaware Limited PartnershiD. the successor in interest to Callawav Land and Cattle ComDanv Callaway LaRd aRð Cattle COffi38RY. M. Within 21 days of the effective date of this resolution amending Resolution No. 89-73, the developer, shall record a notice of adoption of this order'in compliance with Chapter 380,06(15)(f), Florida Statutes, with copies of said notice being provided to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, S1. Lucie County and the City of Port S1. Lucie, After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was,.ªs follows: Chairman Gary D. Charles, Sr. AYE Vice-Chairman Paula Lewis AYE Commissioner Cliff Barnes AYE Commissioner John D. Bruhn AYE Commissioner Ken Sattler AYE PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 18th day of August, 1998, .. . -\~ " ,. OUNì"i~ CI ........... ' ~'A 'ö-.....~\.\~~ ~o~ J.....¡' ~I & ..... ~ ~ ,::) <'(I;. \ ~ u ( G:¡ " -,,:~-1. I ':fl r:: ~ :I~:~~; ;~:~.~.~~~~~ ,le... c..) \ ';;".--,..-... .t '- l" .'" <:: d'"Þ- ...! C,,~ ·...t.:'..;·· ,.... . . l I.. .. .. .... ,rl .' '-'-I!' ..~¡,' ..~.:-.~':::" BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS .r;: ST. LUCI COUNTY, FLORIDA " 011.. .~ :~ ..f;' ."1:,"' ,,' .,","-' " " "~J)'.:,],...'" .1.." ....=. . . ,J .:~ _:..':'. '.' 98-1 OO(resvdo) DJM/ ------------- j>eputy Clerk 9//~-tgp- - Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D,Q, Page 52 PRINT DATE: OB/18/98 . 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 4- ¿5 26 27 28 29 30 31 . 32 33 34 35 3L.. 37 38 39 40 j .. OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0246 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION This Description Does Not Depict Lines of Ownership A Parcel of Land Lying in Sections 14, 15, 16, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 34 And 35, Township 36 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, More Particulary Described as Follows: Begin at the Southwest Corner of Said Section 15; Thence Soutn--~9° 23' 26" East, along the South Line of Said Section 15, a Distance of 812.97 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Westerly Line of a Parcel of Land Described in Official Records Book 514, Pages 237-239, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; Thence North 44° 46'07" East, along the Westerly Line of Said Parcel of Land, a Distance of 1393.92 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Westerly Line of the Plat of G. O. Team Industrial Park - Unit One, as Recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 31, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; Thence Northeasterly along the Westerly Line of Said Plat of G. O. Team Industrial Park Unit One the Following Courses and Distances: North 45° 13'33" West, 660.03 Feet to the Point of Intersection with tr"e P.i'\sterJy Right-of-'...ay Line of t.1,~ F1.n17;i<'lél F.ast;, CO;:1f;j: paUway;. Thence North 44° 45' 58" East along Said Easterly Right-of-way Line, a Distance of 120.00 Feet; Thence South 45° 13'53" East, 510.04 Feet; Thence South 63° 39'59" East, 158.11 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Easterly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement as Recorded in Deed Book 198, Page 1040, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. , Thence South 44° 45'58" West, along Said Westerly Line of Said Plat of G. O. Team Industrial Park - Unit One and its Northerly Prolongation and the Easterly Line of Said Florida Power and Light Easement, a Distance of 4001.62 Feet; Thence . , I . South 89° 29' 01" East, a D1stance of 574.47 Feet to the P01nt of Intersect10n with th~ast Line of Said Section 15, Being the Westerly Line of the Plat of Port St. Lucie Section Forty Four, as Re~orded in Plat Book 16~-~age 23, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; Thence South 89° 29'01" East, along the Northerly Line of Said Plat of Port St. Lucie Section Forty Four, a Distance of 112.97 Feet to the Westerly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement as - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition £t~ihe Ui~B\I!k is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D.O. Page 53 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 ,. .. OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0247 1 Recorded in O::ficial Records Book 90, Page 71, Public Records of St. Lucie 2 County, Florida; Thence South 00° 21' 26' West, along the Westerly Line of Said 3 Florida Power and Light Easement, a Distance of 3975.26 Feet to the Point of 4 Intersection with the North Line of Said Section 23; Thence North 89° 23'16" 5 East, along Said North Line of Section 23, a Distance of 33.09 Feet to the Point 6 of Intersection with the Westerly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement, 7 Recorded in Official Records Book 97, Page 504, Public Records of St. Lucie 8 County, Florida; Thence South 00° 00'15" West, along the Westerly Line of Said 9 Florida Power and Light Easement, a Distance of 5305.53 Feet to the Point of 10 Intersection with the North Line of Said Section 26; Thence South 00° 00' 02" East 11 along the Westerly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement Reco,rded in 12 Official Records Book 120, Page 199, Public Records of Sf~ucie County, Florida, 13 a Distance of 2,898.15 t~_the Point of Intersection with the Proposed Westerly 14 Right-of-way Line of the Proposed 1-95 Interchange; Thence Southerly along Said 15 Proposed Right-of-way the Following Courses and Distances; 16 17 Afore Said Point Being a Point in a Curve Concave to the Northwest 18 to Which a Radial Line Bears South 47° 50' 57" East with a Radius of 19 600.50 Feet; Thence Southwesterly along the Arc of Said Curve, a 20 Distance of 176.71 Feet, Through a C~ntral Angle of 16° 15'37"; 21 Thence South 59° 00' 40" West, 462.08 Feet to a Point of Curvature 22 of a Curve Concave to the Southeast, Having a Radius of 621.42 Feet; 23 Thence Southwesterly along the Arc of Said Curve, a Distance of 24 416.77 Feet Through a Central Angle of 38° 25" 38"; Thence South 20° 15 35'02" West, 532.11 Feet to a Point of Curvature of a Curve Concave 26 - to' the Northwest, Having a Radius of 131.00 Feet, Thénce 27 Southwesterly along the Arc of Said çurve 149.35 Feèt, Through a 28 Central Angle of 65° 19'11"; Thence South 85 54'13 "West, 388.39 29 Feet; Thence South 05° 58'06" East, 64.11 Feet; Thence South 890 30 54'13" West, 300.01 Feet; Thence South 00 05'47" East, 140.00 South 31 05 46'23" West, 64.11 Feet; Thence South 86 05'47" East, 960.95 Feet 32 to a Point of Curvature of a Curve Concave to the Southwest Having 33 a Radius of 600.50 Feet; Thence Southeasterly along the Arc o~ Said-- 34 Curve a Distance of 626.00 Feet Through a Central Angle of -59° 43' 35 45", to a Point of Compound Curvature of a Curve Concave to the 36 Southwest, Having a Radius of 1295.00 Feet; Thence Southeasterly 37 along the Arc of Said Curve, a Distance of 60.40 Feet Througþ a 38 Central Angle of 02~39'23" to the Point of Intersection with the 39 Westerly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement Recorded in 40 Official Records Book 97, Page 504, Public Records of St. Lucie 41 County, Florida; 42 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition ~tri](e Ekrsli!'k is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D.O. Page 54 PRINT DATE: OB/18/98 .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 -1.4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 "6 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 _4L 42 43 44 .... OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0248 Thence South 00 00'02" East, along the Westerly Line of Said Florida Power and Light Easement, a Distance of 411.27 Feet; Thence along the Westerly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement Recorded in Official Record Book 468, Page 2897, the Following Courses and Distances: Thence South 00 35'29" East, 1849.11 Feet; Thence South 06° 37'22" West, 631.95 Feet; Thence South 12° 26'07" West, 640.99 Feet; Thence South 19° 28'36" West, 683,65 Feet; Thence South 79° 27'56" West, 55.51 Feet; Thence South 10° 32'03" East, 50.00 Feet; Thence North 79° 27' 56" East, 55.39 Feet; Thence South 40° 32'32" East, 168.87 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Westerly Right-of-way Line of State Road- No. 9 (I-95); 7'" Thence South 23° 34 44" West, along Said Westerly Right-of-way, Line of State Road No.9 (I-95), a Distance of 676.24 Feet; Thence South 89° 50'59" West, 902.32 Feet; Thence North 43° 08' 26" West, 1,710.03 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Easterly Line of a Parcel of Land Described in Official Records Book 247, Page 664, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; Thence North 61° 23'48" East, along Said Easterly Line Of. Said Parcel, a Distance of 683.12 Feet; Thence North 54° 08' 26" West, along the Northerly Line of Said Parcel, a Distance of 1136.31 Feet; Thence South 61° SI' 34" West, along the Westerly Line of Said Parcel, a Distance of 1535.64 Feet; Thence South 40 58'54" West along the Westerly Line of Said Parcel, a Distance of 959.07 Feet to Point of Intersection with the Northeasterly Right-of-way Line of the South Florida Water Management District Canal No. C-24; Thence North 43° 08'26" West, along the Northeasterly Right-of-way Line of Said South Florida Water Management District ""Canal No.-'C-24, a Distance of' 10,173.69 Feet; Th~nt..:e i~ol.·i:jr '';6'' 44' 37" ::cist, 1261.19 Feet; Thence North 43° 08'40" West, Parallel with the Northeasterly Right-of-way Line of Said South Florida Water Management District Canal No. C-24, a Distance of 5082.07 Feet; Thence North 43 34·09" West, Parallel with Said Northeasterly Right-of-way of Said South Florida Water Management District Canal No. C-24 I a Distance of 5340.47 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Easterly Right-of-way Line of the Florida East Coast Railway; Thence North 440 45'58" East, along the Easterly Right-of-way Line of the Florida East Coast Railway, a Distance of 8,141.46 Feet to the Point of Intersection With. Th~West Line of Said Section 15; Thence South·OOo 36'34" West, along the West Line of Said Section 15, a Distance of 110.12 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the South Line of Said Section 15 and the Point of Beginning. Containing 2,690 Acres More or Less. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition &trihe 1;àre\i!R is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D.C, Page 55 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 .. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 , 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 4 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 )' OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0249 EXHIBIT B SANDHILL CRANE NESTING MANAGEMENT PLAN The developer shall preserve two areas that provide potential nesting habitat for Sandhill Cranes. These areas are depicted on Map H, Other areas maybe defmed by the developer as Sandhill Crane nesting sites, including areas designated as mitigation or restoration areas, to reflect documented nesting activity or frequency of use with the approval of the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Conunission. Wetlands providing nesting site habitat shall meet the folloWIng criteria: · Located within 1/2 mile of a known nest site. · Minimum wetland depressional radius of 100 feet with ordinary high water elevations of 2-3 feet, ordinary low water elevations of 0.5-2 feet and dominated by wetland grasses and forbs (little or no woody vegetation) · Minimum managed upland perimeter buffer of 100 feet from jurisdictional wetland limits, managed as open native wetland transition or uplands foraging habitat - This area shall have no more than 20% shrubby understory 3.0 feet or less in height, no forest canopy, and characterized by grassy ground cover, · A visual screen of native vegetation, planted or naturally occurring, at least 5 feet in height and at least 20 feet ~1l width to provide.~ vi.<:":\l.barri~r to surrounding hnma!' di!Jt11rbance!J it'duòin.g rp.sjdp.t1.t:i1\1 none!Jtíe!i. · Where golf course fairways or lakes are adjacent to the nest site wetland, the managed upland perimeter may be reduced to 50 feet in width and the visual screen eliminated provided the width of the fairway or lake is at least 150 feet. The upland perimeters and buffers may be modified as appropriate to accommodate landscape design or sound environmental planning, so long as the proposed plan will not significantly reduce the area of the wetland-Ð.esting depressional, transitional wetland., or upland foraging habitat; and so long as no construction occurs within 300 feet of the designated "center" of the proposed nesting site. Management of the non-golf course portions of the buffers and wetlands shall be pursuant to recommendations developed in consultation with the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission, During the months of December 1, to April 30, no construction within 300 feet of preserved or restored wetland shaH occur until the wetland has been surveyed for Sandhill Crane nests, In the event that active nests are found, construction shall not occur until July or 90 days after the eggs hatch whichever comes first. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition ÐEri][e Uirell.!!A is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D.O. Page 56 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 ,... .. ~...... .. t. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 . 9 ,¿O 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0250 EXHIBIT H MASTER PLAN FOR THE RESERVE (LARGE SCALE MAPS ON FILE WITH ST, LUCIE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT) Double Underlined is for addition Ðl!rilEe thret!!h is for deletion - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D,Q, Page 57 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 .; .,.~ :"'!\" - , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ?,C; 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 . OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0251 * ill . - - - . ~ , ~ - . ..c___ . ---. _-- a- t::! .. - ..-.....- .. . .. .. ::- MASTER PLAN - THE RESERVE ....... w..... ~ q.M -- -- .c....... ........ :=:..--===-= =:=::...::.:.-.::::.. - Ë::-=--===-- '. ~IIIQ,_.'" MAP 'H' ~~~ÞC. -=~~- --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -" - -. - ....- '- - - - - - - ------- Double UnderÜned"is for addition £t.ri(e, thre1:i!!ß is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D,Q, Page 58 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 t PGA Village Notice ofProposed~hangeto Reserve D~ Submitted to The Treasure Coast Rchrional Planning Council July 2003 i . State of Florida Department of Community Affairs Division of Resource Planning and Management Bureau of State Planning Division of Community Planning 2555 Shumard Oak Boulevard Tallahassee, FL 32399-2100 (850) 487-4545 NOTIFICATION OF A PROPOSED CHANGE TO A PREVIOUSLY APPROVED DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT roRl) SUBSECTION 380.06(19). FLORIDA STATUTES Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes, requires that submittals of a proposed change to a previously approved DR! be made to the local government, the regional planning agency, and the state land planning agency according to this fonn. 1. I, Debbie M. Orshefsky, Esq., the undersigned authorized representative of Reserve Homes Ltd., L.P., hereby give notice of a proposed change to a previously approved Development of Regional Impact in accordance with Subsection 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. In support thereof, I submit the following infonnation concerning The Reserve development, which infonnation is true and correct to the bèst of my knowledge. I have submitted today, under separate cover, copies of this completed notification to St. Lucie County, the City of Port St. Lucie, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, and to the Bureau of State Planning, Department of Community Affairs. 'ó[è ,-( 01 (Date) CC)~ ~ ICy.<;J. (Signature) 4 · ¡, 2. Applicant (name, address, phone). Reserve Homes Ltd., L.P. 1601 Forum Place, Suite 805 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 (561) 682-9500 3. Authorized Agent (name, address, phone). Greenberg Traurig, P.A. 515 E. Las Olas Boulevard, Ste. 150L- Ft. Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954) 768-8234 Fax: (954) 759-5534 Contact: Debbie M. Orshefsky, Esq. 4. Location (City, County, TownshiplRange/Section) of approved DRI and proposed change. The Reserve DR! is located in St. Lucie County, with a portion falling within the City of Port St. Lucie. It is located in Township 36, Range 39 and Sections 15,21-22, and 27-28. The proposed change will update and revise certain conditions of the Development Order. 5. Provide a complete description of the proposed change. Include any proposed changes to the plan of development, phasing, additional lands, commencement date, build-out date, development order conditions and requirements, or to the representations contained in either the development order or the Application for Development Approval. Indicate such changes on the project master site plan, supplementing with other detailed maps, as appropriate. Additional information may be requested by the Department or any reviewing agency to clarify the nature of the change or the resulting impacts. The proposed change will revise and update the project development program and various conditions and requirements in the Habitat, Vegetation and Wildlife, Recreation and Open Space, Fire Protection, Transportation and Housing sections of the previously approved DR! as reflected on the proposed Amended DR! Development Order attached hereto as Exhibits "A-I" and "A-2" In support of these changes, see the following enclosed Transportation Analysis (Exhibit "B"); Affordable Housing Analysis (Exhibit "C") and Air Quality Analysis (Exhibit "D"). The proposed change will also remove approximately I 0 acres of land from the DR!. The removed land is being included in the proposed PGA Village DR!. The new legal description for the portion of the DRI property located in the County is attached as Revised Exhibit "A" to Exhibit "A-I" of this NOPC. i ~ 6. Complete the attached Substantial Deviation Determination Chart for all land use types approved in the development. If no change is proposed or has occurred, indicate no change. See Substantial Deviation Detennination Chart attached as Exhibit "E." 7. List all the dates and resolution numbers (or other appropriate identification numbers) of all modifications or amendments to the originally approved DRI development order that have been adopted by the local government, and provide a brief description of the previous changes (i.e., any information not already ~addressed in the Substantial Deviation Determination Chart). Has there been a change in local government jurisdiction for any portionof.the development since the last approval or development order was issued? If so, has the annexing local government adopted a new DRI development order for the project? December 20, 1988 St. Lucie County adopted Resolution 88-357 approvmg the original Development Order. March 14, 1989 Resolution 89-73 amended and repealed Resolution 88-357 following the resolution of an appeal filed by the TCRPC to the approval of Resolution 88-357. November 12, 1991 Resolution 91-228 amended Condition Number 55, Transportation. May 25, 1993 Resolution 93-061 extended the completion date for Phase I of the project, and extended the buildout dates and phasing buildout dates for the project. It extended the tennination date of the Development Order. It imposed certain deadlines relating to some of the conditions in the Development Order and extended certain other deadlines. July 27, 1993 Resolution 93-125 amended the development order to provide for reassessment of environmental mitigation, transportation and other conditions. October 17, 1995 Resolution 95-195 amended the Development Order to address the comments raised at the Pre-application conference held with the TCRPC on November 19, 1992 February 13, 1996 Revised the Development Order to change the submittal dates of certain material and incorporated Map H, the master development plan. February 4, 1997 Resolution 97-023 incorporated the tenns of the settlement agreement between the Department of Community Affairs ("DCA") and the Developer following DCA's appeal of Resolution · 95-195. May 6, 1997 Resolution 97-086 corrected a scrivener's error in Resolution 97- 023. August 18, 1998 Resolution 98-100 decreased the amount of retail space approved for development and reflected a change in ownership of the Project There has been no change in local government jurisdiction. 8. Describe any lands purchased or optioned within 1/4 mile of the original DRI site subsequent to the original approval or issuance of the DRI development order. Identify such land, its size, intended use, and adjacent non-project land uses within 1/2 mile on a project master site plan or other map. Applicant owns lands constituting the PGA Village DR! immediately south of The Reserve. An Application for Development Approval of a Development of Regional Impact is pending. 9. Indicate if the proposed change is less than 40% (cumulatively with other previous changes) of any of the criteria listed in Paragraph 380.06(19)(b), Florida Statutes. Not applicable. Do you believe this notification of change proposes a change which meets the criteria of Subparagraph 380.06(19)(e)2., F.S.? Yes No X- 10. Does the proposed change result in a change to the build-out date or any phasing date of the project? If so, indicate the proposed new build-out or phasing dates. No. 11. Will the proposed change require an amendment to the local government comprehensive plan? Yes. See Exhibit "F", which is a copy of an application to amend the City of Port S1. Lucie Comprehensive Plan and the Right-of-Way Protection Map of the Traffic Circulation Element of the S1. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 12. An updated master site plan or other map of the development portraying and distinguishing the proposed changes to the previously approved DRI or development order conditions. See Exhibit "0", attached copy of Revised Map H. 13. Pursuant to Subsection 380.06(19)(t), F.S., include the precise language that is being proposed to be deleted or added as an amendment to the development order. This language should address and quantify: (a) All proposed specific changes to the nature, phasing, and build-out date of the development; to development order conditions and requirements; to commitments and representations in the Application for Development Approval; to the acreage attributable to each described proposed change of land use, open space, areas for preservation, green belts; to structures or to other improvements including locations, square footage, number of units; and other major characteristics or components of the proposed change; (b) An updated legal description of the property, if any project acreage islhas been added or deleted to the previously approved plan of development; (c) A proposed amended development order deadline for commencing physical development of the proposed changes, if applicable; (d) A proposed amended development order termination date that reasonably reflects the time required to complete the development; (e) A proposed amended development order date until which the local government agrees that the changes to the DRI shall not be subject to down-zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, if applicable; and (t) Proposed amended development order specifications for the annual report, including the date of submission, contents, and parties to whom the report is submitted as specified in Subsection 9J-2.025(7), F.A.C. Please see Exhibits "A-I" and "A-2" for proposed changes. \'oftI.In01'OUHI!FS1CYD\410389vO I\8SNPO II,DOC\2I2S/03 .. Draft 08/20/03 RESOLUTION NO. 2003-_ A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTIONS 89-73, 91-228, 93-061, 93-125, 95-195,97- 023, &BtI 97-086 and 98-100 APPROVING A SIXTH SEVENTH AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMP ACT KNOWN AS THE RESERVE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Callaway Land & Cattle Company has filed a Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval with S1. Lucie-County, Florida and the City of Port St. Lucie, Florida, in accordance with Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. 2. Callaway Land & Cattle Company oril!inallv proposes mODosed to construct 4,100 dwelling units; 1,600,000 square feet of industrial space; 290,000 square feet of retail space; 100,000 square feet of office space; and 250 hotel rooms, constituting a Development of Regional Impact on the real property legally described in Section B below, located in S1. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie, all located in the State of Florida. 3. The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County as the governing body of S1. Lucie County having jurisdiction over that portion of this project located in the unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, pursuant to Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, is authorized and empowered to consider Applications for Development Approval for Developments of Regional Impact. 4. On December 8, 1988, the St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency held a public hearing of which due notice was published in the F1. Pierce News Tribune, and recommended to this Board that the Development Order approval for the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve, be granted. 5. The Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County, Florida, on the 15th day of December 1988, held a public hearing on the ----Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval for The Reserve, and has heard and considered the testimony taken there at. 6. At this public hearing, and following its closure, the Board of County Commissioners continued any further action on this application until Tuesday, December 20, 1988. 7. On Tuesday, December 20, 1988, the Board of County Commissioners removed from the table, the request of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact, for Development Order approval. \\ftI-sMlI IMAUSCI40 I 02JvOSIILFJOS! ,DOCI8I201OJISSOS 1,0 10200 1 8. 9. 10. 11. . Draft 08/20/03 The Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, has received and considered the assessment report and recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. On December 20, 1988, the Board adopted Resolution No. 88-357, effective December 28, 1988, granting development order approval to The Reserve. On January 20, 1989, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council voted to appeal the County's Development Order to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission. In March of 1989, representatives of the new project developers and the Treasure Coast Regional--flanning Council reached a settlement in regard to the items under appeal and the amended Development Order, resolution 89-73, reflects that settlemenC-- 12. On March 14, 1989 this Board granted approval to Resolution 89-73, effective March 21, 1989, which amended the approved Development Order for the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve, and at the same time repealing Resolution 88-357. 13. On November 12, 1991, this Board granted approval to Resolution 91-228, which amended Condition Number 55 of Resolution 89-73, the approved Development Order for the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve. 14. On January 22, 1993, Callaway Land and Cattle Company filed a Notification of Proposed Change to an Approved Development of Regional Impact, pursuant to Chapter 380.06(19), Florida Statutes for a second amendment to Resolution 89-73. 15. On May 25, 1993, this Board granted approval to Resolution 93-061, which provided for a second amendment to Resolution 89-73, the approved Development Order for the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve and determined that the proposed amendments did not constitute a substantial deviation to the original Development Order. 16. On July 27, 1993, this Board granted approval to Resolution 93-125, which provided for a third amendment to Resolution 89-73, the approved Development Order for the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve and determined that the proposed amendments did not constitute a substantial deviation to the original Development Order. 17. At the time Resolution 93-061 was approved by the Board, the approval was conditioned upon the applicants, Callaway Land Cattle Company, filing with St. Lucie County, The Florida Department of Community Affairs and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council a Notification of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact for the purpose of reviewing the upland/wetland mitigation, transportation and any other related conditions effecting the development of this project by November 23, 1993. The Notification of Proposed Change was to include the comments/issues presented at the developer's pre-application meeting held with the \\ftl-srvO IIMAUSC\401 023\'OS\8LFJOS! ,DOCI8I2010315S0S 1,01 0200 2 .. Draft 08120/03 Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council on November 18, 1992 from which there had not yet been any official filing of proposed amendments. 18. On May 25, 1993, Callaway Land and Cattle Company filed a Notification of Proposed Change to an Approved Development of Regional Impact, pursuant to Chapter 380.06(19), Florida Statutes for a fourth amendment to Resolution 89-73. 19. On September 21, 1995, the S1. Lucie County Local Planning Agency/Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published in the Port St Lucie News and the Tribune on August 17, 1995 and August 31, 1995 on the proposed amendments to Resolution 89-73, as previously amended. 20. On October 17, 1995, this Boaïâñe1d a public hearing, of which due public notice was published in the Port S1. Lucie News and the Tribune on August 17, 1995, August 31, 1995 and September 26, 1995 on the proposed amendments to Resolution 89-73, as previously amended. 21. On October 17, 1995, this Board granted approval to Resolution 95-195, which provided for a fourth amendment to Resolution 89-73, the approved Development Order for the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve. 22. On May 17, 1996, the Florida Department of Community Affairs filed with the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission and Notice of Appeal of the approved Amended Development Order for the Reserve (FL W AC Case No. 96-010). 23. On December 16, 1996, the Florida Department of Community Affairs and the developers of The Reserve, Callaway Land and Cattle' Company, Inc., entered into a Settlement Agreement for the purpose of addressing the issues raised under the Department of Community Affairs appeal of the approved Amended Final Development Order for The Reserve (Resolution 95-195). 24. On January 23, 1997, the developers of The Reserve, Callaway Land and Cattle Company, Inc., requested that the Board of County Commissioners consider an amendment to the Amended Final Development Order for the Reserve (Resolution 95- 195) based on the settlement agreement with the Department of Community Affairs on their appeal of the Approved Amended Final Development Order for The Reserve (Resolution 95-195). 25. On February 4, 1997, this Board granted approval to Resolution 97-023, which provided for a fifth amendment to Resolution 89-73, the approved Development Order for the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve and determined that the proposed amendments, that were based on the settlement agreement between the Callaway Land and Cattle Company and the Department of Community Affairs on the Department of Community Affairs appeal of the Approved Amended Final Development Order for The Reserve (Resolution 95-195) and further that the proposed amendments did not constitute a substantial deviation to the original Development Order. \\ftl-srJO IIMAUSCI40 1023vOS\8LFJOSI,OOCI8/20103\SSOS 1,010200 3 Draft 08/20/03 26. On May 5, 1998, Callaway Land and Cattle Company filed a Notification of Proposed Change to an Approved Development of Regional Impact. pursuant to Chapter 380.06(19), Florida Statutes for a sixth amendment to Resolution 89-73. 27. On August 18, 1998, this Board held a pablic heariRg, of which due public notice was published in the Port 81. Lucie News and the Tribooe OR July 30. 1998 on the proposed amendments to ResolutioR 89 73, as previously amended. i!Tanted aooroval to Resolution 98-100. which orovided for a sixth amendment to Resolution 89-73. the aODroved Develooment Order for the Develooment of Rei!Ïonal Imoact known as the Reserve. ' 28. The Board believes that approviRg this sixth amendmeftt to the Amended Final Developmeftt Order for The Reserve is in the best interest of the public health, saf"6ty and public ·..¡elfare of the citizeas of St. Lucie CoW1:ty, Florida. aRd further tbat the proposed amendmeRts do not constitute a substantial deviation to the original Developmeftt Order, as ameftded. On .2003. Reserve Homes. Ltd.. L.P.. filed a Notification of Prooosed ChanlZe to an Aooroved Develooment of RelZional Imoact oursuant to Chaoter 380.06(9), Florida Statutes. (NOPC) for a seventh amendment to Resolution 89-73 to. amonlZ other thinlZs. would amend the DR! Develooment PrOi!l'am to be as follows: 3.200 residential units: 500.000 sauare feet of industrial soace: 290.000 sauare feet of retail soace: 100.000 sauare feet of office soace: 250 hotel rooms: 4 1Z0lf courses with accessory buildinlZs and a oassive and an active recreation area which may include: baseball and multioumose fields: ooerational offices: welcome center: oarkinlZ for 750 vehicles: and a children's team soorts traininlZ center: on 81± acres. The NOPC also amends t4e boundarv of the DR! to eliminate 10 acres from the DR!. 29. The Board of Co1:H1ty Commissioners continues with the folloviÍag amended FINDINGS of Ff..CT and CONCLUSIOÞŒ of Lf..W with regard to the l\pplication f-or Deyelopmeftt Approval as cited in ResolmioR 89 73: The Board believes that aoorovinlZ this seventh amendment to the Amend<{çl Final Develooment Order for The Reserve is in the best interest of the oublic health. safety and oublic welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie Countv. Florida. and further that the orooosed amendments do not constitute a substantial deviation to the orilZinal Develooment Order. as amended. J!t The Board of Countv Commissioners continues with the followim! amended FINDINGS of FACT and CONCLUSIONS of LA W with relZard to the Aoolication for Develooment Aooroval as cited in Resolution 89-73: AMENDED FINDINGS OF FACT A. The proposed Development is not in an area of Critical State Concern as designated pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. B. The State of Florida has not adopted a land development plan applicable to the area in which the proposed Development is to be located. \1ftI~nO I\MAUSC\401023vOSI8LFJ05I,DOCI8I201OJISSOS 1,010200 4 Draft 08120/03 C. On October 21, 1988, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council issued a report and recommendations on this development pursuant to Chapter 380.06(12)(a), Florida Statutes. D. On August 25, 1995 the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council issued a report and recommendations on the Notification of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact (The Reserve) pursuant to Chapter 380.06(12)(a), Florida Statutes. E. On June 4, 1998 the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council issued a report and recommendations on the Notification of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact (The Reserve), filed May 5, 1995¡fursuant to Chapter 380.06(12)(a), Florida Statutes, and determined that the proposed changes to the Final Development Order for the Reserve would not constitute a substantial deviation to the previously approved Development Order. F. On . 2003. the Treasure Coast Rel!ional Planninl! Council advised the Citv in writinl! that it had reviewed the Notification of ProDosed Chanl!e to a Previouslv ADDroved DeveloDment of Rel!ional ImDact for the Reserve DR!. fil~d . 2003. Dursuant to ChaDter 380.06(9)(0(4), Florida Statutes. and determined that the DroDosed chanl!es to the Final DeveloDment Order for the Reserve DR! wou\d not create simificant rel!ional imDacts not Dreviouslv reviewed. G. The proposed Development is consistent with the local comprehensive plan, development laws and regulations of St. Lucie County. !L DeveloDer has submitted a comDrehensive air aualitv comDuter modelinl! studv which demonstrates that State and federal air aualitv standl\fds have been met. and which does not identify anv exceedances reauirinl! carbon monoxide monitorinl! or abatement. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. That in a public meeting, duly constituted and assembled this davof . 2003. .¡..gilt day of f.:ugust, 1998 411t Resolution 98 100 _, which amends Resolution 98-100. 97-023 (as corrected by Resolution 98-086) which amended Resolution No. 95-195, which amended Resolution No. 93-125, which amended Resolution No. 93-061, which amended Resolution No. 91-228, which amends Resolution No. 89-73, which amended Resolution No. 88-357 granting Development Order Approval to the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve, is hereby APPROVED subject to the following conditions, restrictions and limitations: APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL \\ftI-srvO IlMAUSCI401 023vOSIILFJOS! ,DOC\8I20103\SSOS 1,01 0200 5 Draft 08/20/03 1. The Reserve Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval is incorporated herein by reference. It is relied upon, but not to the exclusion of other available information, by the parties in discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Substantial compliance with the representations contained in the Application for Development Approval, as modified by Development Order conditions, is a condition for approval. For the purpose of this condition, the Application for Development Approval shall include-the following items: a. Application for Development Approval dated July 9, 1987; b. Supplemental information dated December 3, 1987; June 15, 1988; July 22, 1988; July 29, 1988; and August 12, 1988; and c. Materials dated September 28, 1988; September 30, 1988; and October 6, 1988, which were received by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council after the formal Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval review process was terminated by the applicant and local public hearings had been scheduled. d. Notice of proposed change dated May 25, 1993. e. Materials submitted January 31, 1994, August 5, 1994, and February 3, 1995 with the Notice of Proposed Change/Substantial Deviation ADA for the substantial deviation determination. 1: Notice of Pro Dosed Cbanl!e filed Mav 5. 1998. ~ Notice of ProDosed Chanl!e dated .2003. DELETED PARAGRAPHS Paral!1"aDhs 5. 54. 558. 55C. 58.-j'J:-60. 61. 62. 63. 64. 65. 66A. 67. 68. 69. 73. 74. 75. 76 and 78 of this DeveloDment Order have been deleted. COMMENCEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT 2. In the event the developer fails to commence significant physical development for any development beyond that authorized in the Development Agreement within three years from the effective date of the Development Order (the earlier of two dates if separate Development Orders are issued by St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie), development approval shall terminate and the development shall be subject to further development-of-regional-impact review by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council pursuant to Section 380.06, Florida Statutes. For the purposes of this paragraph, construction shall be deemed to have been initiated after placement of permanent \\III-lrvO I\MAUSCI40 I 023v05I1LFJOS !,DOC\II20103\s 5051,0 10200 6 Draft 08120/03 evidence of a structure (other than a mobile home) on a site, such as the pouring of slabs or footings or any work beyond the stage of excavation or land clearing. Phase I shall be completed within twelve years. If not completed within that time, further development shall be subject to substantial deviation review. Project buildout dates and phasing buildout dates reflected in the ADA are extended four years. Termination Date: This development order shall terminate 24 years from the effective date of Resolution 89- 73, March 21, 2013. Any final development plan approvals not yet received at the completion of this 24 year period will be subject to further review under the provisions of Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, or as subsequently amended. AIR 3. Clearing of specific building sites shall not commence until the developer is ready to construct the building or buildings to be located in that site unless seeding and mulching of disturbed areas are undertaken within 30 days of completion of clearing work. During land clearing and site preparation, wetting operations or other soil treatment techniques appropriate for controlling unconfined emissions, including seeding and mulching of disturbed areas, shall be undertaken and implemented by the developer to the satisfaction of the City of Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie County, and the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation. 4. During land clearing and site preparation, wetting operations or other soil treatment techniques appropriate for controlling unconfined emissions, including seeding and mulching of disturbed areas, shall be undertaken and implemented by the developer to the satisfaction of the City of Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie County, and the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation. mSTORlC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES 6. In the event of discovery of any archaeological artifacts during project construction, the developer shall stop construction in that area and immediately notify the Division of Historical Resources in the Florida Department of State. Proper protection, to the satisfaction of the Division, shall be provided by the developer. HABITAT, VEGETATION, AND WILDLIFE 7A. Wetlands 1,4,5,6, 10, 15, 16,26,33,38,39,52,61, 61A, 61B, 62, 63, 64, 65, 71, 78, 80, 81, 83, 84, 86, 89, 91, 92 and 93 as permitted and delineated in the jurisdictional survey and reflected on the Master Plan, Exhibit H (a.k.a. Map H) shall be retained and/or restored if necessary, and maintained in viable condition in perpetuity. The applicant shall obtain required permit approvals to alter/restore these wètlands from the South Florida Water Management District and the US Anny Corp of Engineers. To ensure that listed species of the preserved wetlands are not adversely impacted, the permit approval \\ftI-srvO IIMAUSC\40 1023vOS\lLFJOS I,DOCI8I20103\SSOS 1,0 10200 7 -, Draft 08/20/03 of the wetland alteration/restoration shall be based on coordination with and review by the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission. Any development of areas set aside for preservation or special protection of endangered or threatened plants or animals designated as endangered, threatened or species of special concern, as identified on Map H, shall be subject to development order review pursuant to Section 380.06(19)(b)16, Florida Statutes. Any alteratión or modification to any other preserved jurisdictional wetland that is done consistent with any Federal, State or regional pennitting agency shall not constitute a substantial deviation. Such wetlands modification shall be included in the annual Development of Regional Impact status report. Map H in the Development Order shall be amended, for updating purposes, to ensure that the DR! development plan is consistent with the pennit modification no later than six months after South Florida Water Management District accepts certification of the surface water management system for t11efõurth (4th) Reserve Golf Course (PUD II). Viability and maintenance shall be assured by deed restriction, good development and drainage design plan which will include quality control measures based on South Florida Water Management District's best management practices. Assignment of future preservation and maintenance responsibility shall be to an entity approved by the South Florida Water Management District or designated in Rule 9J-2.041 (9), F AC. This assignment shall occur prior to build-out of the phase in which wetlands occur. Adverse impacts that occur due to factors within the developers' reasonable control, to any of the identified wetlands prior to build- out of this project shall be the responsibility of the developer to repair. Any restoration conducted pursuant to this condition shall be completed in consultation with, and in a manner approved -by, the South Florida Water Management District and/or the US Anny Corps of Engineers based on consultation with Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Cpmmission to ensure that preserved wetlands are not adversely impacted. " No building pennits or certificates of occupancy shall be issued for any part of the Reserve Development of Regional Impact after the effective date of this development order (the earlier of two dates if separate development orders are issued by 81. Lucie County and the City of Port S1. Lucie), until: 1. the ditch connecting wetland 61 B to the C24 outfall route has been plugged up to tIle rim of the wetland; and, 2. after January 1, 1997 unless all of the remaining restoration required by this condition has been completed and approved by the South Florida Water Management District. 7B. Wetlands 62 and 76 shall be preserved until such time as the Developer has created a replacement wetland in mitigation for these preserved wetlands to be removed. Such created wetlands shall be constructed to fully replace the functions and values equal to those of wetlands 62 and 76. No removal of wetlands 62 and 76 shall take place until the created wetlands are complete, inspected and approved by the South Florida Water Management District. \\ftHnOtIMAUSC\40 1023vOS\8LFJOS! ,DOCIBI2010]\sSOS 1,01 0200 8 Draft 08/20/03 7C. Any wetland habitat creation pennitted under this condition (7) shall be completed by the earlier to occur of January 1, 1997 or the issuance of any final PUD, plat or building permit for the two thousandth (2000th) residential unit in The Reserve. 8. No final planned development or plat approvals shall be issued after January 1, 1994 until one of the following actions have been completed: a. The developer has completed, to the reasonable satisfaction of the South Florida Water Management District, the creation of 50.0 acres of wetland habitat in mitigation for wetland habitat already destroyed on this project and previously required to be mitigated by South Florida Water Management District; or - b. The developer has dedicated, by conservation easement or some other instrument acceptable to St. Lucie County and South Florida Water Management District, to St. Lucie County, or another entity acceptable to S1. Lucie County, and South Florida Water Management District, 50.0 acres of upland habitat; or c. The developer has accomplished a combination of the actions described in (a) and (b) above which is acceptable to both South Florida Water Management District and S1. Lucie County. If the developer chooses to meet all or part of this responsibility by creation of wetland habitat, then the continued viability and maintenance of this habitat shall be assured by deed restriction, good development and drainage plan design, and assignment of future preservation and maintenance responsibility to any entity approved by South Florida Water Management District prior to build-out of the phase in which the created wetland occurs. If the developer chooses to meet all or part of this mitigation responsibility by dedicating upland habitat as in option (b) above, such lands shall be transferred with restrictions that require their preservation as nature habitat area. Such lands shall not be credited towards the requirement that the Developer preserve 25 percent of the upland habitat on site, pursuant to Condition 15. d. Any wetland habitat creation pennitted under this condition (8) shall be completed by the earlier to occur of January 1, 1994 or the issuance of final PUD or plat approval for the two thousandth (2000th) residential unit in The Reserve. The developer will provide S1. Lucie County and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council copies of the pennits or other instruments showing compliance with the above conditions. 9. No Final planned development or plat approval shall be issued after January 1, 1995, until one of the following has been completed: \\ftI-.rvO IIMAUSC\401023vOSIILfJOS ,DOCIII20103\sSOS 1,0 I 0200 9 Draft 08/20/03 a. The developer has completed, to the reasonable satisfaction of the South Florida Water Management District, the creation of wetland habitat as required by South Florida Water Management District Permits (above and beyond any wetland habitat created pursuant to the previous recommended condition), in mitigation for wetland habitat already destroyed on this project site; or b. The developer has dedicated, by conservation easement or some othe.r instrument acceptable to St. Lucie County and the South Florida Water Management District, to St. Lucie County, or another entity acceptable to St. Lucie County and South Florida Water Management District, additional upland habitat acceptable to South Florida Water Management District (above and beyond any upland habitat deeded over pursuant to the previous comtitions); or c. The developer has accomplished a combination of the actions described in (a) and (b) above which is acceptable to both South Florida Water Management District and St Lucie County. d. In the event developer has been unable to complete the creation of the required additional acreage of wetland habitat as described in (a) above on or prior to January 1, 1995, it may post a security for its completion of performance. The form and content of the instrument providing said security shall be subject to the approval of St. Lucie County and shall include a sufficient amount of non- disturbed quality upland habitat acreage, as described above, equal to the acreage of wetlands which have not yet been created in accordance with (a) above. Such habitat posted in accord~ce with this section shall be released by the acre in exchange for each acre of wetland habitat subsequently created by the Developer in furtherance of his satisfying the condition set forth in 9(a). This procedure shall be deemed to satisfy the conditions required for issuance of final planned development, plat approvals or building permits after January 1, 1995. But under no circumstances shall planned development or plat approval be issued after January 1, 1997 without completion of wetland habitat as described in (a) above. e. Any wetland habitat creation permitted under this section shall be completed by the earlier to occur of JanuaryT, 1997 or the issuance of a final planned development or plat approval for the two thousandth (2000th) residential unit in The Reserve. The developer will provide St. Lucie County and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council copies of the permits or other instruments showing compliance with the above conditions. 10. Mitigation Master Plan for the Reserve DR! must be submitted to and approved by the South Florida Water Management District prior to wetlands mitigation required by this D.O. occurring on site. As a minimum, the Master Plan shall set forth: a. The general criteria for construction and maintenance of wetland habitat; \\IIHnIOIIMAUSCI40 I 02JVOS\8LFI0S! ,DOCI8I201OJISSOS 1,0 I 0200 10 Draft 08/20/03 b. identify the location of all proposed mitigation relative to preserved wetland and upland systems, the surface water management system, and development; c. provide for a mitigation, monitoring, and maintenance program; and d. include a justified estimate of total cost of implementing the proposed mitigation and monitoring program. . To be approved, mitigation plans must be found to fully replace the functions and values provided by exempted wetlands that have been or will be eliminated. Reasonable assurance of financial and institutional ability to carry out the commitments included in the approved mitigation plan may be provided by anyone or combination. of the following: a. a surety bond in the amount equal to 125 percent of the cost estimate for implementing the approved mitigation and monitoring plan; b. performance guarantee to St. Lucie County and/or the City of Port St. Lucie as part of a project construction guarantee, provided the guarantee adequately covers costs; c. cash bond or letter of credit from a financial institution; d. escrow agreements which include money, land, or improvements; and, e. performance prior to wetland loss only applies to mitigation for wetlands not yet destroyed. The specific form and adequacy of the guarantee shall be subject to approval by St. Lucie County, if mitigation occurs within the County, or the City of Port St. Lucie and the TCRPC, if mitigation occurs within the City. Financial guarantees shall not be released ---rör any portion of the project until work is completed, inspected, and approved in writing by the South Florida Water Management District. The annual report shall include a summary of wetland mitigation accomplished pursuant to the approved master plan. A copy of the approved Mitigation Master Plan will be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. 11. Lakes or canals shall not be excavated within 200 feet of any wetlands which are preserved or restored on the project site. Wells in the shallow aquifer shall not be located within 300 feet of any wetlands which are preserved or restored on the project site. Any exceptions to this condition must be approved by the South Florida Water Management District on the basis of soil or other data showing that water table elevations within preserved wetlands would not be adversely affected. \\IIHnOIIMAUSc\401 02JvOSIILFJOS I,DOC\II2010JISSOS 1,01 0200 11 .. Droft 08120103 A copy of any South Florida Water Management District permit or other consent addressing this condition will be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. 12. To help assure that maintenance or implementation of predevelopment hydroperiods occurs within the preserved and restored wetlands and within any wetland mitigation areas, final drainage plans shall provide for routing of sufficient volumes of runoff ITom acceptable sources to wetlands prior to routing of any excess runoff to lake systems. Control elevations shall be established consistent with the intent to maintain or improve predevelopment hydroperiods within all wetland areas. The South Florida Water Management District must approve the routing of runoff and control elevations as shown on the final drainage plans to achieve the intent indicated above. Copies of the South Florida Water Management District construction permits will be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. 13. The developer shall preserve and maintain a buffer zone of native upland edge vegetation around all preserved, restored, or created wetlands on site in accordance with the requirements of the South Florida Water Management District. The buffer zone shall include a canopy, understory, and ground cover of native upland species including saw palmetto, wiregrass, galiberry, Lyonia, or other upland species subject to approval of the TCRPC. The upland buffer may include slash pine and wax myrtle, but these species shall not be used in determining the location of the boundary between the wetland and upland. The buffer zone requirements of preserved or created wetlands for listed species shall be in accordance with the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission guidelines as contained in the Florida Administrative Code, as of the time that the buffer zone is developed. The requirements of the upland buffer shall include a total area of at least ten square feet per linear foot of wetland, except where an expanded upland buffer has been required for protection of the Sandhill Crane as recommended by the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission (provided for under the approved management plan referenced herein, and attached hereto and made a part thereof as an exhibit) and be located such that no less than fifty percent of the total shoreline is buffered by a minimum width of ten feet of upland habitat. Upland buffer shall be clearly delineated, and roped off prior to any land clearing within 200 feet of any wetland to be preserved or restored. 14. No further land clearing or development activities shall take place on the Reserve DRI until: a. the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission and the United States Fish and Wildlife Service approve a management plan for protection and management of the Red-cockaded Woodpecker; and, b. St. Lucie County is notified in writing that the management plan is approved. The management plan shall provide for the permanent preservation of any colony sites deemed necessary by the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Each preserve colony site shall be no less than ten \\ftI-IrvO IIMAUSC\40 I 023VOSIILF 10S! ,DOCI8I20103\SSOS 1,0 I 0200 12 Draft 08/20/03 acres in size and have boundaries no less than 200 feet from all existing cavity trees within the preserve. The Preserved colony sites may be irregularly configured and should include the best habitat for the Red-cockaded Woodpecker contiguous with the colony. The Developer shall not develop the underland or understory within the Preserve area. The plan shall also provide for sufficient foraging opportunities within one-half mile of the colony site to meet the recommended criteria set by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service Red- cockaded Woodpecker Recovery Plan. The plan must also include a monitoring program to insure that sufficient foraging opportunities are maintained. The plan may-be updated and amended and the preserve areas modified from time to time to accommodate then-current conditions with the approval of the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer to implement the approved plan. A copy of the approved plan shall be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. 1 S. The developer shall-has preserve oreserved no less than 25 pereent a minimum of (490 acres~ of native upland habitat in accordance with the St. Lucie County's Comprehensive Plan for land within the jurisdiction of the County and with the City's comprehensive plan for land within the jurisdiction of the City as deoicted on Exhibit attached hereto. Native upland habitat preserved and protected by deed restrictions pursuant to wetland buffer zone requirements and upland habitat required for the protection of species of special regional concern, including the Red-cockaded Woodpecker colony sites and Sandhill Crane upland buffer, may be counted toward meeting this minimum requirement. The balance of this preserved acreage may be the result of micrositing of development or selective clearing of areas to be developed, including individual lots when developed, provided maintenance of habitat is required through deed restriction. However, as a minimum, preserve areas shall be of appropriate size, quality, and arrangement to maintain existing populations of species of special regional concern on the property. No credit toward this 2S percent may be given for land set aside in compensation for wetlands destroyed by the development which are required to be mitigated. Native upland habitat is defined as areas exhibiting native species in all layers of canopy, understory, and ground cover that are present Areas with native trees, but planted ground cover do not qualify as native uplands (e.g., improved pasture). ,This reauired unland nreservation set aside mav be met bv unland habitat creation within the PGA VillaŒe DR! buffer area alonŒ the western nerimeter of the nroiect as deoicted::X~~ ~~ ~~~~r olan. The buffer area shall be a minimum of 200' in width_ averaŒe 500' and _ . u _ __ "n width. No develooment shall occur within this area. The buffer area shall be -;;í~~t~d i~ ~~i~; veŒetation in coni unction with any develooment adiacent to that area. The devel~~;~~~~o~~e evidence of annroyal from FPL to nlant in any area within the FPL riŒht of way _ _ s II be considered an annroved unland mitiŒation site for meetinŒ unland nreservatio~ ~~~~i;;~;~;~, The mitiŒation ratio for renlantinŒ the buffer will be 1.5 to }, Exhibit" "deoicts The develeper shall ideøtify on a eWTeBt geod quality aerial photo the minimum 490 acres areas preserved pursuant to this condition Bfld sübmit the marked aerial aad indieate the aereage in the 8I1Büal report required by Seetioft 380.06, Florida \w...oIIMAUSC\401023\'OS\8LFJOS! ,DOCI8I20103\SSOS 1,01 0200 13 Draft 08/20/03 Statutes. The land has been restricted as reauired. The annual report shall include copies of deed restrictions assuring preservation of native upland habitat acreage. Preservation on individual lots, if used to meet the habitat requirement, shall be established by the developer through pennanent deed restrictions. The annual report shall also include copies of deed or other restrictions assuring preservation of native upland habitat acreage. Portions of the reauisite 490 acres of uDland nreserve located in the Citv can be develoDed and off site uDland habitat Drovided. 16. Prior to commencement of clearing activities on any portion of the Reserve site, the Developer must survey for gopher tortoise burrows. Protecting in situ, or relocation into a suitable on-site preserve is required before development of the parcel surveyed. If gopher tortoise burrows are found, any Florida mouse, gopJïerfrog, and Eastern Indigo snake found shall be provided for as well. The plan for protection of these species shall be reviewed and approved by the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. After approval of the plan, specific parcels may be cleared and developed subject to compliance with the methods and procedures stated in the plan without further approval. The annual report required by section 380.06 Florida Statutes, shall include a summary of survey and relocation efforts prepared by a qualified biologist. 17. As a minimum, the Developer shall preserve two areas that provide potential nesting habitat for Sandhill Cranes. One of these areas shall include wetlands 80, 81, and 83 and associated buffers (as identified in Map H). The other shall include portions of wetland 61, which includes 61A or 61 B) and associate buffers (as more specifically identified on Map H). The developer shall, after consultation with the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission, provide a species and habitat management plan by March 5, 1997, as referenced herein at DO conclusions of law and attached hereto as Exhibit B. A detailed site plan delineating the areas required by this condition shall be attached hereto and made a part of hereof. These wetlands areas shall be depicted on Map H as preserve areas consistent with Conditions 7a and 13. Management of the non-golf course portions of the buffers and the wetlands shall be pursuant to recommendations of the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. During the months of December I, to April 30, no construction within 300 feet of any preserved or restored wetland shall occur until the wetland has been surveyed for Sandhill Crane nests. In the event that active nests are found, construction shall not occur until July or 90 days after the eggs hatch, whichever occurs first. Construction of these areas during the months and days indicated may proceed based in coordination with the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission. 17 A. The application of pesticides, nematicides, and fungicides to the golf courses and other areas at The Reserve shall be done only in accordance with the applicable product label instruction, shall be applied only by, or under the supervision of, State of Florida licensed applicators, and shall be applied pursuant to the Integrated Pest Management Plan, \l11I-1M> IlMAUSC\40 1023vOSIILFJOS t:DOCIII20103\S50S 1,0 10200 14 Draft 08/20/03 attached hereto, and as it may be amended from time to time with the approval of the Florida Department of Agriculture. 18. Prior to further development activity, the developer shall provide the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council with a letter assuring that access will be allowed to The Reserve Development of Regional Impact in perpetuity for the purposes of monitoring compliance of the project with conditions set forth. 19. In the event that it is determined that any additional representative of a plant or animal species of special regional concern (as defined in the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Assessment Report for The Reserve Development-of Regional Impact) is resident on, or otherwise is significantly dependent upon, The Reserve Development of Regional Impact property, the developer shall cease all activities which might negatively affect that individual population and immediately notify both the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Proper protection, to the satisfaction of both agencies, shall be provided by the developer. 20. Concurrent with construction in any phase of the development, all Melaleuca, Brazilian Pepper, and Australian Pine which occur within that phase shall be removed. Removal shall be in such a manner that avoids seed dispersal by any of these species. There shall be no planting of these species on sité. DRAINAGE 21. The developer shall design and construct the stormwater management system to retain the maximum volumes of water consistent with providing flood protection. The system shall be designed and constructed to retain or detain with filtration, as a minimum, the first one inch of runoff or the runoff from a one-hour, three-year storm event, whichever is greater. Required retention volumes may be accommodated in a combination of vegetated swales, dry retention areas, lakes with vegetated littoral zones, or other suitable retention structures. All discharges from the surface water management system shall meet the applicable water quality standards as established by the Florida Administrative Code. Completed construction pursuant to a valid South Florida Water Management District construction permit for a stonnwater management system shall constitute compliance with this condition. 22. The developer shall design and construct the surface water management system such that maintenance of normal hydroperiods within restored, preserved, and created wetlands can be guaranteed against the negative impacts of activities within the project boundaries, and that the functions and values provided by these habitats will be maintained. Under no circumstances shall unfiltered runoff from impervious surfaces and parking areas be diverted directly into wetlands on site. Final drainage plans shall be submitted to South Florida Water Management District, St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie. At a \\111-10'0 IIMAUSC\40 I 02JvOS\8LFJOSI,DOC\II2010JISSOS 1,0 I 0200 15 Draft 08/20/03 minimum, such plans shall depict how preserved and created wetland areas will be incorporated into the development site plans for each individual development area or drainage basin with appropriate supporting information to demonstrate how sufficient quantities of surface runoff from portions of the developed areas will be conveyed to wetland areas in order to maintain or improve their existing hydroperiod. Clearing of the land in a development area or drainage basin shall not begin until plans are approved by the appropriate agencies for the development area or drainage basin. Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council will be provided copies of any construction pennits issued by South Florida Water Management District. 23. The developer shall benn and swale or otherwise design and construct the golf course stonnwater management systems to retain the first one-half inch of runoff from a one- hour, three-year storm event, prior to discharge of excess water to wetland habitats. 24. Maintenance and management efforts required to assure the continued viability of preserved and created wetland littoral zone and upland habitats and the proper operation of all components of the surface water management system shall be the financial and physical responsibility of the developer. Any entities subsequently approved by St. Lucie County or the City of Port St. Lucie to replace the developer shall be required, at a minimum, to assume the responsibilities outlined above. All golf course irrigation systems shall be designed in such a manner as to allow for a minimum 100 foot separation from any existing or proposed potable water well, (ref F AC 17-6.040(4)(q)). Should the waste treatment system not meet the standards of a Class I reliability, then this minimum setback shall be 500 feet. 25. The developer shall establish a vegetated and functional littoral zone as a part of the surface water management system of lakes. Prior to construction of the system for each development area or drainage basin of the project, the developer shall prepare a design and management plan for the wetland/littoral zone that will be developed as part of that system. The plan shall: a. include plan view and site location; b. include typical cross sections of the surface water management system showing the average water elevation after taking account the effects of wellfield pumping and irrigation withdrawals on the lake system and the -3 foot contour (i.e., below average elevation); c. specify how vegetation is to be established within this zone, including the extent, method, type and timing of any planting or mulching to be provided; and d. provide a description of any management monitoring and maintenance procedures to be followed in order to assure the continued viability and health of the littoral zone. MHnOIIMAUSCI40 1 02JvOSIILFJOS I,DOCI8f20103\SSOS 1,0 1 0200 16 Draft 08/20/03 The littoral zone as established shall consist entirely of native vegetation and shall be maintained permanently as part of the water management system. As a minimum, ten square feet of vegetated littoral zone per linear foot of lake shoreline shall be established. -The plan shall be subject to approval by St. Lucie County, the City of Port St. Lucie, and the South Florida Water Management District prior to the beginning of any excavation activity. Littoral zones shall be constructed concurrent with lake excavation and final grading. Operational permits for the surface water management system shall not be issued until such time as the littoral zones have been constructed and inspected. WATERSUPPLY: POTABLE AND NONPOTABLE WATER 26. The primary source of golf course irrigation water shall be water derived from the surface water management system of lakes supplemented by surficial aquifer wells as permitted by SFWMD. No withdrawals from lakes shall be permitted which would adversely affect wetlands required by the Development Order to be preserved on site, or wetlands and littoral zones created on site as mitigation for wetland functions and values lost as a result of this development. At the time of water use permit issuance or renewal, the developer shall comply with applicable South Florida Water Management District rules and criteria for permit issuance, which criteria may in the future require the use of reclaimed water. The continued or proposed use of surficial aquifer wells to supply irrigation water to golf courses shall occur only as pennitted by South Florida Water Management District. 27. Construction of additional golf courses beyond those already constructed shall not occur until it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the South Florida Water Management District that sufficient irrigation water can be derived on a sustainable basis from wastewater sources and surface water management system lakes to provide for irrigation requirements without adversely affecting wetlands required by the Development Order to be preserved on site, or wetlands and littoral zones created on site as mitigation for wetland functions and values lost as a result of this development. 28. All water use by The Reserve Development of Regional Impact shall be metered, whether derived from surface water management system lakes for irrigation or from well fields servicing The Reserve Utility Corp. for domestic use. Annual water use data shall be provided to the South Florida Water Management District and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council as part of the annual report to be submitted by the developer as required by Section 380.06, Florida Statues. 29. To reduce the demand for irrigation water, a minimum of 30 percent of all landscaping material and 50 percent of all planted trees shall be native plants adapted to the soil and climatic conditions occurring on site. 30. To the maximum extent consistent with wetland protection, surficial aquifer wellfields serving The Reserve Development of Regional Impact shall be located such that principal land uses within the cone of influence of such wells are open space, preserve, or residential area. In no case shall development which would use, handle, store, or produce \lftl-snO IIMAUSCI40 I 02JvOSIILFJOS!DOCIII201OJISSOS 1,01 0200 17 · Draft 08/20/03 hazardous or toxic materials occur within the cone of influence (i.e., one foot drawdown area) of a surficial aquifer potable water supply well, unless such use, handling, storage, or production is consistent with binding wellfield protection regulations. 31. In no case shall reverse osmosis reject water be utilized for irrigation purposes unless approved by the appropriate state permitting authority. 32. Water-saving plumbing devices shall be required in all construction (both residential and nonresidential) to reduce potable and nonpotable water demand. These devices shall include low flush toilets and efficient faucets and shower heads to help reduce the use of potable water for these uses. 33. Rates charged for potable water use shall be structured to encourage water conservation. 34. All residential water requirements shall be supplied by a common utility which shall provide water service to all existing and proposed development, except Sabal Creek Phases I, II, III and IV. 35. No final planned development or plat approval shall be issued for The Reserve Development of Regional Impact beyond construction authorized by the Development Agreement executed by the Department of Community Affairs, until the South Florida Water Management District notifies St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie in writing that the method of providing potable and non potable water needs to such further development proposed by the developer is permitted and will not have adverse impacts to: a. wetlands required by the Development Order to be preserved on site or wetlands and littoral zones created on site as mitigation for wetland functions and values lost as a result of this development; b. the potentiometric head of the Floridan Aquifer, if applicable; and c. the ability of existing legal users to meet their permitted potable and nonpotable requirements. Parameters and methods of hydrologic investigations undertaken to demonstrate that a sufficient source of water is available to serve further development proposed by the developer without adversely impacting the items listed above shall be established to the satisfaction of the South Florida Water Management District. Receipt of a valid South Florida Water Management District consumptive use permit for a withdrawal shall constitute compliance with this section. 36. All residential, commercial and industrial water and sewer requirements shall be supplied by the a common utility which shall provide water and sewer service to all existing and proposed development, except Sable Creek Phases I, II, and IV, and Reserve Plantation I, IIA, and lIB, which contain lots which are in excess of the minimum requirements of \\III-IM! IIMAUSCI40 I 023v0511LFJ05!.DOC\1I20103\S5051,O 10200 18 · Draft 08/20/03 one-half acre and any lots proposed within Sable Creek Phase III (56 acre parcel) providing such lots be at least one acre in size. At such time and in the event water and/or sewer lines are made available to lots contained the subdivisions referenced herein, they shall be required to hook up to the common utility service then provided by the utility company. 37. Any consents or other approvals required from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and/or in consultation with other governmental agencies, as a condition to further development approvals being issued after the effective date of the development order, shall not be subject to unreasonable delay after all submissions and other data required by such agency (including TCRPC) from developer, has been supplied. 38. Maintenance and management efforts required to assure the continued proper operation of all components of the central water supply system shall be the financial and physical responsibility of The Reserve Community Development District until such time as it may be conveyed to another entity. Any entities subsequently authorized to replace The Reserve Community Development District shall be required, at a minimum, to assume the responsibilities outlined above or delegate such responsibilities to another entity to the satisfaction of the City of Port St. Lucie and St. Lucie County. Appropriate plans, specifications and applications for the water plant expansion shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) upon the existing water treatment facility reaching a finishing water maximum day demand equal to 80% of the DEP's rated plant capacity. Construction of the expansion shall begin before or when the facility achieves a maximum day finished water production equal to 90% of DEP's approved rated plant capacity. 39. The unobligated Floridan Aquifer well as referenced on Map F, dated July 1987, revised November 1988, as contained in The Reserve Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval, shall be capped and abandoned in accordance with South Florida Water Management District criteria prior to commencement of development outside the area authorized for development in the Development Agreement. The obligated well referenced on Map F as described above shall be capped and abandoned in accordance with South Florida Water Management-District criteria within 30 days of resolving such obligation for off-site use. WASTEWATER 40. Development shall only occur concurrently with the provIsIon of adequate central wastewater treatment services. Prior to application for building permits for any part of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact at the beginning of each phase, the developer shall demonstrate that adequate treatment facilities will exist on schedule to handle all wastewater generated from both completed and planned development. Evidence of adequate treatment and disposal capability shall be subject to approval by St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection. \\III-.NO IIMAUSC\40 1023.oSIILFJOSI,DOCIII201OJ\sS05I,OI0200 19 ~ Draft 08/20/03 The central wastewater treatment system shall be expanded based on the following flow capacities (actual 3 peak month average daily): a. When flows reach 60% of permitted capacity, a consultant will have been chosen. b. When flows reach 70% capacity, appropriate plans, specifications and application for wastewater plant expansion shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Regulation. c. When flows reach 75% capacity, construction shall begin and be completed and certified prior to flows reaching 95% of permitted capacity. 41. The existing and proposed wastewater treatment and disposal system shall be constructed or modified to produce irrigation quality water so that spray irrigation of such water will be the primary wastewater disposal method. Excess wastewater may be disposed of through percolation ponds, as permitted. 42. Maintenance and management efforts required to assure the continued proper operation of all components of the central wastewater treatment system shall be the financial and physical responsibility of The Reserve Community Development District until such time as conveyed to another entity. Any entities subsequently authorized to replace The Reserve Community Development District shall be required, at a minimum, to assume the responsibilities outlined above or delegate such responsibilities to another entity to the satisfaction of S1. Lucie County and the City of Port S1. Lucie. HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE 43. Within three months of the effective date of the Development Order (the earlier of two dates if separate Development Orders are issued by St. Lucie County and the City of Port S1. Lucie), the developer shall submit a hazardous materials management plan for review and approval by the City of Port S1. Lucie, and St. Lucie County in consultation with the South Florida Water Management District and the Department of Environmental Protection. If said approval is not obtained within six months of the effective date of the Development Order, no further final planned development approvals or plats shall be issued for any part of the project until approval is obtained. The plan shall: a. require disclosure by all owners or tenants of non- residential property of all hazardous materials proposed to be stored, used, or generated on the premises; b. require inspection of all business premises storing, using, or generating hazardous materials prior to the commencement of operation, and periodically thereafter to assure that adequate facilities and procedures are in place to properly manage hazardous materials projected to occur; \\ftI-srvO IIMAUSC\40 1023vOS\8LFJOSI.DOCI8I20103\SSOS 1,01 0200 20 Draft 08/20/03 c. provide minimum standards and procedures for storage, prevention of spills, containment of spills, and transfer and disposal of such materials; d. provide for proper maintenance, operation, and monitoring of hazardous materials management systems including spill and hazardous materials containment systems; e. detail actions and procedures to be followed in case of spills or other accidents involving hazardous materials; and f. guarantee financial and physical responsibility for spill cleanup. MONITORlNGAND COMPLIANCE 44. In addition to all information required by Chapter 380, Florida Statutes; by Chapter 9J-2, Florida Administrative Codè; by St. Lucie County; and by the City of Port St. Lucie for inclusion in an annual report to be prepared and submitted by the developer for The Reserve Development of Regional Impact, the following information must be included: a. emT-ent, good quality aerial photo showing Rative Hpland habitat preserved purs1:lant to the De....elopmem Order, aereage of the preserved areas, Emd eopies of deed restÌ"ietions ass1:l£ing preservatioR of aative 1:Iplaad habitat aereage; b. summary of Gopher tortoise surveys and relocation efforts as required by the Development Order; and eh· water use data (amounts from all sources) per Development Order condition requiring metered 'water use sources. EDUCATION 45. From the date of enactment of this resolution, until January 1, 1989, any residential development permitted within The Reserve, shall be subject to the voluntary school assessment incorporated as a part of that unit's development approval. Effective January 1, 1989--:aIT residential development within this project shall be subject to the tenns and requirements of St. Lucie County Ordinance 88-16, School Impact Fees, and as may subsequently be amended. RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 46. The developer shall reserve a minimum of eight acres of land iR f01:l£ pareels ao less than two aeres eaeh in size to be deeded free and clear of all liens and encumbrances to homeowners' associations. the Citv of Port St. Lucie or St. Lucie Countv within The Reserve Development of Regional Impact for the establishment of recreational facilities geared to the needs of children living within the development. Parcels shall be reserved in an arrangement that will most conveniently serve the most residents based on proximity \\III-IMI IIMAUSCI40 I 023vOS\8LFJOS!,DOC\8I20103\SSOS 1,01 0200 21 Draft 08/20/03 of residential areas. +hePrior to delivery of any recreational Darcel to an aODrooriate homeowner's association. tb~ developer shall establish a fund of not less than $5,000 fur construction of or construct aODrODriate recreational facilities on eaeh parcel~ to be turned over to the appropriate homeowners' association to pro'¡ide iRitial fundiRg for meilities on each paree!. The appropriate equipment or íaeilities to be developed OR eaeh parcel shall be determined by the homeowners' assoeiation. 47. Within oae year of the effeeti-¡e date of the Deyelopmem Order (the latter oft-:/o dates if separ-ate De-¡elopment ORlers are issued by 81. Lueie County and the City of Port 81. Lueie), the developer shall pFevide a plan for the proyisioa of beaeh aeeess points aad parkiag facilities to meet the demand ereeted by residential deyelopment ia The Reserve Deyelopment of Regioaal Impae1. The plan shall iBelaèe 8ft evalaatioa and estimate of the demand for beaeh aeeess poiBts iB both 81. Lueie and Martia CoW1ties. The methodology used tø projeet beaeh aeeess anè parkiag demand shall be agreed upoa by the de'¡eloper and apprøviag ageBeies prior to plan iBitiatioß and shall be submitted as part øf the eømpleted plan. The plan shall proyide a prøgr-am. fer meetiRg any projeeted demand. The plan must be apprøved by 81. Laeie COUflty. Martin COHnty, and the Tr-easure Coast RegioBaI Planning C01:lBeil may pro-¡jde the eounty eomments on the plan. If appro'/al is BOt obtaiBed withiB twø years of the effeetive date of the Development Order as aforemeBtioaed, BO further buildiRg permits shall be issued for any part of the projeet 1:lßtil approval is obtaiaed. Beaeh aeeess points and parkiag faeilities shall be eOBstructed and available tø serve prø,jeeted demand ia aeeordanee with the approved plan. 81:1bjeet to the foregoiag, imprøvemeBts re€luired of the Develøper shall not exeeed, iB proportioa to the level øf serviee or faeilities made available by the respeetiye Coooties for their residents. The County has Drovid~d adeauate beach access Doints and Darkim! facilities to meet the demand created bv residents of The Reserve DR!. POLICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY 48. Prior to the issuance of any building pennits, in any portion of this project in the unincorporated areas of S1. Lucie County, the following assessment shall be paid for the purpose of police/public safety: Residential :- Single Family Multi-Family $111 per unit $ 99 per unit Office: Medical Office Financial Office Other Office $231 per 1000 sf $506 per 1000 sf $127 per 1000 sf Retail: 0- 49,999.9 sf 50,000 - 99,999.9 sf $250 per 1000 sf $298 per 1000 sf \~I-.rvO I\MAUSCI4O I 023vOS\lLFJOS ,DOC\II20103\SSOS 1,0 I 0200 22 Draft 08/20/03 100,000 - 199,999.9 sf $299 per 1000 sf Hotel/Motel $111 per unit Upon the enactment of a formal public safety (police) impact fee ordinance by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners, the terms and conditions of that ordinance shall apply to the unincorporated portions of this project, described in Section B of this resolution. FIRE PROTECTION 49. The developer shall reserve ORe pareel, amlRiauHB size of t':.TQ acres and eønfigured to meet the needs ef the 8t. Lueie CøW1ty/Ft. Pieree Fir-e Distriet, witkiR tàe Reserve Commeree Park. This site shall be eonveyed to the Fire Distriet iR a ffianBer and time aeeeptable to the Fire District, if se required. The fire orotection needs of the Reserve will be met throUlzh a combined effort which includes adiacent develooments of PGA VillaQ:e and Traditions. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any residential unit within The Reserve, including any hotel/motel unit, the developer shall pay to the S1. Lucie CountylFt. Pierce Fire District the sum of $225 per unit to meet the fire protection needs of this development. Upon the enactment of a formal public safety (fire) impact fee ordinance by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners, the terms and conditions of that ordinance shall apply to those portions of this project, described in Section B of this resolution. ENERGY 50. In the final site and building design plans, the developer shall: a. incorporate those energy conservation measures identified on pages 25D.1 and 25D.2 of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval; - b. comply with the Florida Thermal Efficiency Code Part VII, Chapter 553, Florida Statutes; and, c. to the maximum extent feasible, incorporate measures identified in the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's Regional Energy Plan dated May, 1979, and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan. As a minimum, the developer shall demonstrate that incorporation of energy conservation measures already committed to and those measures to be incorporated by the requirement \\ft1-sn<O IlMAUSCI40 I 02J.oS\8LFJOSI ,DOC\8I20103\S50S 1,0 I 0200 23 Draft 08/20/03 of Condition 51 below has reduced projected energy demand by 20 percent below that demand which would have occurred without incorporation of the measures. 51. The developer shall incorporate each of the I 7 energy saving methods outlined in the ENERGY section discussion of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's Assessment Report for The Reserve Development of Regional Impact unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council that individually each method is not cost effective. TRANSPORTATION 52. No building pennits shall be issued after the effective date of the Development Order (the earlier of two dates if separate Development Orders are issued by S1. Lucie County and the City of Port 81. Lucie) for the Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the necessary right-of-way owned by Callaway Land & Cattle Company along the westerly extension of Prima Vista Boulevard has been dedicated free and clear of all liens and encumbrances to S1. Lucie County or Florida Department of Transportation as necessary and consistent with the St. Lucie County Thoroughfare Plan for Prima Vista Boulevard, and intersections thereof, and as necessary to provide for ultimate laneage of Prima Vista Boulevard. 53. Prima Vista Boulevard, west of 1-95, shall be designed as a primary public access route extending from the 1-95 interchange to the westlsoHth\vest southeast and northwest property lines of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact, and appropriate right-of- way shall be dedicated to provide for such an alignment. Design and construction of the roadway shall maintain acceptable levels of service on both Prima Vista Boulevard and 1- 95 and meet the requirements of the Florida Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. 53A. WithiB the Reserve Commeree Cemer, iadastrial land ase may be eKehanged for the followiag alternate land ases, so 10Rg as the total pm peak hom, peak direetion traffio impact f-rom allases vlÍ1hiB the Reserve Cemmeree CeRter floes Bot eKoeed the eWTeftt ~rovefl traffiø impaet attributable to iBflustrial àe'lelopmem: Retiremeftt Home -l;%G m 484 4,.m ~ 9 ~ ~ ACLF Medical Center In the event the Develooer decides to increase the amount of Dennitted uses within the ProDOsed DeveloDment. the Develooer shall include in an aQDlication for PUD zoniDl! for the PUD Dod within which such chanl!e is contemDlated. an analvsis showinl! the DroDosed chanl!e and how it Ilftl-srvO tIMAU5C140 t023.oSIILFJOS! ,DOC\II201OJISSOS 1,0 I 0200 24 Draft 08/20/03 conforms to the conversion methodolos!:ies set forth below. In addition. the DR! Annual Reoort shall include information indicatinl!: the cumulative number of sinl!:le-familv dwellinl!: units. condominium/townhouse dwellinl!: units. timeshare units. hotel units. office SQuare footal!e. industrial SQuare footal!e. and retail SQuare footal!:e that have been aooroved bv the City as of the date of the Annual Reoort;. but in no event shall more than 100.000 SQuare feet of retail SQuare footal!e be converted to another use. The followinl!: conversion matrix shall be used to allow land use conversions within the Prooosed Develooment: Io..Gá Land :Iwk GmuaI ~ CwuIol Shnnninø ~ Hotd Tim~~hllrr f:lfDa 1lsc WI Indudrilll ~ Townbouu Cm1u -_._._-~- Gpn"MIIII,jpht lodustrilll ~ lAD du 2A2 d.u .L.1Q DDS 2.i1 ~ m sf ill sf Sinp".Fllmilv lW ill sf - ill d.u 1.21 DDS l.8.1 wW ill sf ill sf Condorrownbou~r lJlli ill sf o.sJ du - UQ DDS .l.O6 wW 2.3.2 sf lO.4 sf H.Il1d ilM i2D sf on du Ul d.u = .l.Sl wW ill sf ill sf Timp~hur LUni1 J2Q sf ~ du OM d.u OM DDS -. 226 sf 22 sf 01Iiu ~ 1121 sf 2A2 du ill d.u 2.23. DDS W wW = ill sf ShoDninp Crntu ~ lliJ sf ill du ill d.u 6.1l DDS l!!.H wW 22B2 sf -- 53B. Following approval of the development order modification necessary to permit the location of the public access road from the 1-95 interchange north through The Reserve Commerce Center connecting to Glades Cut-Off Road, the developer shall immediately commence survey, design and permitting work for the construction of the road. The road shall be constructed within two years after approval of the amended Development Order modification. This period may be extended due to delays in permitting and approval by action of the governing bodies of the City of Port St. Lucie and St. Lucie County approving a written request for extension from the developer; however, the road shall be constructed and-open to the public within one year after receiving all permits for its construction. No building permits for any residential development associated with the fourth golf course shall be issued until the road is completed. 55A. No building permits shall be issued for The Reserve Developmenfof Regional Impact after January 5, 1996, until an acceptable clean and irrevocable Letter of Credit, or other form of funding or security acceptable to St. Lucie County, is provided to St. Lucie County in a sufficient amount to design, permit, and construct intersection signalization at West Midway Road and Gla4es Cut-Off Road. No Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued in The Reserve Development of Regional Impact after June 30, 1996, until the intersection of West Midway Road and Glades Cut-Off Road is signalized. "Sufficient amount" shall be determined by an engineer's Projection of Probable Cost supplied by the developer and approved by the County Engineer. a) West Midway Road and Glades Cut-Off Road \\III-IM> llMAUSCI401 023v05\1LFJ051,DOCIII20103\55051,O I 0200 25 Draft 08/20/03 Northbound Glades Cut-Off Road One left-turn lane* One through lane One right-turn lane* Eastbound West Midway Road One left-turn lane* One through lane One right-turn lane* Southbound Glades Cut-off Road One left-turn lane* One through/right-turn lane Westbound West Midway Road One left-turn lane* One through lane One right-turn lane* * Improvements beyond current configuration All above configuration, including signalization as warranted, shall be pennitted and constructed in accordance with city, county, or state criteria, as applicable. No building pennits shall be issued for more than 448 (2,778 daily trips) residential units and 95,000 square feet of industrial development (526 daily trips) or after twelve (12) months from the effective date of this Development Order unless the improvements listed under a) above have been let for construction. 55D. Contracts shall be let within 18 months of the effective date of Ordinance No. the followinlZ listed imorovements (i and ii): to construct i) Simalization at St. Lucie West Boulevard and 1-95 West Ramos intersection: and. iD Extend the southbound rilZht-turn lane. includinlZ the deceleration distance. to a location 600 feet back from the STOP bar for the southbound left-turn lane. 55E. No buildinlZ oennits shall be issued for develooment that cumulative Iv lZenerates more than the total PM oeak-hour threshold trios as indicated in Table J. attached hereto as Exhibit" ". until one of the listed alternative actions has occurred for each of the indicated imorovements. 56. No building pennits for non-industrial development shall be issued for more than 1,000 residential units (6,073 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the construction of intersection improvements to obtain the following configuration, including signalization or signalization modification as warranted by city, county or state criteria, as applicable. a) Prima Vista Boulevard and Bayshore Boulevard Northbound Bayshore Blvd. One left-turn lane One through/right-turn lane Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane One through lane One right-turn lane Southbound Bavshore Boulevard Westbound Prima Vista Blvd. \1ftJ.IMlIIMAUSC\40I02J\IOS\lLFJOSI,DOC\II201OJ\SSOS 1,0 J 0200 26 Draft 08/20/03 One right-turn lane* One through lane One left-turn lane One left-turn lane One through/right-turn lane * Intersection Improvements beyond current configuration. All above configurations shall be permitted and constructed in accordance with city, county, or State criteria, as applicable. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for non-industrial development of more than 1,000 residential units (6,073 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the intersection improvements under a) above have been completed. 57. No building permits shall be issued for industrial development within the Reserve Commerce Center generating more than 250,000 (1,383 daily trips) square feet of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following roadway improvements, including all necessary bridge structures (development level thresholds may be increased if it is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that additional development may be accommodated without exceeding Level of Serve "D" peak hour, peak season, or Level of Service "C" under average annual daily conditions): a) Four-lane West Midway Road from 1-95 to Oleander Avenue. No Certificates of Occupancy for industrial development within the Reserve Commérce Center generating more than 250,000 (1,383 daily trips) square feet of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact shall be issued until the roadway improvement under (a) above has been completed (development level thresholds may be increased if it is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that additional development may be accommodated without exceeding Level of Service "D" peak hour, peak season, or Level of Service "C" under average annual daily conditions). 66B. Commencing the year of construction of the public access road from the 1-95 interchange north through The Reserve Commerce Center connecting to Glades Cut-Off Road, signal warrant studies shall be conducted during the peak season at the intersections identified below under a) through d). As such time as the signal warrant analysis identifies the need to install a signal(s), no building permits shall be issued after 120 days after such determination by St. Lucie County or FDOT as applicable until contracts have been let for the installation of the traffic signal/signals in accordance with City, County, or state criteria, as applicable. No certificates of occupancy shall be issued until the traffic signal(s) identified in the signal warrant study has/have been installed and in operation. This condition applies to the following intersections: a) Intersection of connector road with Glades Cut-Off Road, \\ftI.on01\MAUSC\40 I 023vOSIILFJOS! ,DOC\II20103\SSOS 1,0 I 0200 27 Draft 08/20/03 b) intersection of connector road with Reserve Boulevard, c) Intersection of Prima Vista Boulevard with 1-95 Northbound Off Ramp, and, d) Intersection of Prima Vista Boulevard with 1-95 Southbound Off Ramp. The signal warrant analysis is to be performed periodically as requested by St. Lucie County but no more frequently than annually. If the connector road cannot be designed to fit within the 100 foot right-of-way due to horizontal alignment requirements, the developer shall dedicate such additional right-of- way as may be necessary to meet those design requirements. 70. All project entrance intersection configurations shall maintain Council's objective level of service standards. All project entrance intersection configurations, including any Florida East Coast Railway crossings at Glades Cut-off Road/Reserve Boulevard and at Glades Cut-off Road/Reserve Commerce Center (Go Team) entrance, shall be approved as appropriate by the City of Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie County, Florida Department of Transportation, and the Florida East Coast Railway. A copy of approved project entrance intersection configuration shall be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. 71. As a minimum, the Developer shall pay a fair share contribution consistent with the road impact fee ordinance of St. Lucie County. 72. Intersection improvements identified in paragraph (a) below shall be constructed concurrent with the southerly connection of Cashmere Boulevard to Prima Vista Boulevard. a) Prima Vista Boulevard and Cashmere Boulevard Northbound Cashmere Blvd. One left-turn lane* One right-turn lane* Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. Two through -lanes One right-turn lane* Southbound Cashmere Blvd. N/A Westbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane* Two through lanes * Improvements beyond current configuration. N/A = not applicable \\ftl-snoO IIMAUSCI40 1 02Jv05\8LFJ05I,DOC\8I201OJ\S505I,O I 0200 28 Draft 08120/03 No further building permits for non-industrial development shall be issued in The Reserve after the southerly connection of Cashmere Boulevard to Prima Vista Boulevard is open to traffic until the improvements under paragraph (a) above have been completed. 76A. BellinniOll two vears after the aODroval date of this Oevelooment Order. a PM oeak-hour trio Ileneration summarY of aooroved develooment shall be orovided to the County of Sf. Lucie on a semi-annual basis. 76B. Commencißll in 2004 and continuinll everY year thereafter. the develooer shall submit an Annual Status Reoort indicatinll the status (schedule) of Iluaranteed imDrovements. This Annual Status Reoort shall be submitted to the City of Port Sf. Lucie. Sf. Lucie County. FOOT. TCRPC and the OCA as Dart of the Oevelooment of Rellional Imoact Annual Reoort, The Annual Status Reoort shall list all roadway imorovements needed to be consínÍcted. the Iluaranteed date of comoletion for the construction of each needed imorovement. the oartv resoonsible for the Iluaranteed construction of each imorovement. and the form of the bindinll commitment that warantees construction of each imorovement. Additionallv. this reoort shall include the most recently orovided trio Ileneration summarY as reauired under Condition 6 and any land use trade-off conversions that have occurred oursuant to Condition 1 of this Oevelooment Order since the execution of the Oevelooment Order, 77. No final plar.ned development or plat approval shall be isst:led f-or phase 1'1 l:Jf11ess aA traffic study has been conducted by the Developer, submitted to and approved by the City of Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie County, Florida Department of Transportation, and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, which demonstrates that the regional roadway network can accommodate a specified amount of additional Reserve Development of Regional Impact generated traffic and growth in background traffic beyond 2005 and can still be maintained at Level of Service "C" during average annual daily traffic conditions and Level of Service "D" during peak hour, peak season conditions. Sueh study may be requested by St. L\:Icie County prior to phase IV, but after Jamlary 1, 1995. The traffic study shall: a) identify the impr-ovements and timiag of those improvements neeessary to provide Le'lel oLService "C" u8der a~ge ar.aual daily opemti8g eOÐditio8s and Level of Service "D" u8der peak hoW", peak seasoa opeœti8g eoaditioas for the sabject transportatio8 8ehvork duri8g the pr-øjeeted eompletio8 of the project, i8eludi8g projeet impacts and growth ia baekgrøt:lad traffic. Additional fi8al planned development or plat shall 80t be issHed 1:lntil a aew projeet phasiag program and roadv:ay impro~:ement program neeessary to maifttain aee~taÐle levels of serviee have beeÐ approved by the City of Port St. Lueie, St. Lucie Cmmty, Florida Depar.ment of Transportatio8, and TreasW"e Coast Regio8al PIlHhïing CO\::lIleil for the remai8der of the development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, as follows: \11\1,1..0 IIMAUSCI40 102JvOSIILFJOS I.DOCI8120103\SS051,O 10200 29 Draft 08120/03 B. The legal description for the property under this amended Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval, is as follows: SEE ATTACHED REVISED EXHIBIT A C. Any modifications or deviations from the approved plans or requirements of this Development Order shall be submitted to the S1. Lucie County Community Development Director and the Port S1. Lucie City Planner, as appropriate, for a determination by the Board of County Commissioners of S1. Lucie County/City Council of the City of Port S1. Lucie, as to whether the change constitutes a substantial deviation as provided in Section 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. The Board of Commissioners of S1. Lucie County/City Council of the City of Port S1. Lucie, as appropriate, shall make its detennination of substantial deviation at a public hearing after notice to the developer. D. S1. Lucie County/the City of Port S1. Lucie shall monitor the development of the project to ensure compliance with this Development Order. The S1. Lucie County Community Development Director and/or the City of Port S1. Lucie City Planner, as appropriate, shall be the local official assigned the responsibility for monitoring the development and enforcing the tenns of the Development Order. The Community Development Director/City Planner may require periodic reports of the developer with regard to any item set forth in this Development Order. E. The developer shall make an annual report as required by Section 380.06(18), Florida Statutes. The annual report shall be submitted each year on the anniversary date of the adoption, of Resolution 89-73, or the earlier date if two separate orders are adopted, of this amended Development Order and shall include the following: 1. Any changes in the plan of development, or in the representations contained in the Application for Development Approval, or in the phasing for the reporting year and for the next year; 2. A summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the year; 3. Undeveloped tracts of land that have been sold, transferred, or leased to a successor developer; 4. Identification and intended use of lands purchased, leased, or optioned by the developer adjacent to the original site since the Development Order was issued; 5. An assessment of the developer's and local government's compliance with the conditions of approval contained in this Development Order and the commitments specified in the Application for Development Approval and summarized in the Regional Planning Council Assessment Report for the development undertaken; \\II~.n¡() IlMAUSC\40 1 02Jv05\JLFJOS! ,D0C\8120103\SSOS 1,0 I 0200 30 Draft 08/20/03 6. Any request for a substantial deviation detennination that was filed in the reporting year or is anticipated to be filed during the next year; 7. An indication of a change, if any, in local government jurisdiction for any portion of the development since the Development Order was issued; 8. A list of significant local, State, and federal pennits which have been obtained or which are pending by agency, type of pennit, pennit number, and purpose of each; 9. The annual report shall be transmitted to St. Lucie County, the City of Port St. Lucie, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, the Florida Department of Community Affairs, the Florida Department of Natural Resources, the South Florida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, and such additional parties as may be appropriate or required by law; 10. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of a Development Order or the subsequent modification of an adopted Development Order that was recorded by the developer pursuant to Subsection 380.06(15), Florida Statutes; and 11. Any other infonnation requested by the Board of Commissioners of St. Lucie County/City Council of the City of Port St. Lucie or the St. Lucie County Community Development DirectorlPort St. Lucie City Planner to be included in the annual report. F. The definitions found in Chapter 380, Florida Statutes, shall apply to this amended Development Order. G. St. Lucie County hereby agrees that prior to March 14,2009, The Reserve Development of Regional Impact shall not be subject to down zoning, unit density reduction, or intensity reduction, unless the County/City, as appropriate, demonstrates that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the approval of the amended Development Order have occurred, or that the amended Development Order was bas~ substantially inaccurate infonnation provided by the developer, or that the change is clearly --established by St. Lucie County/the City of Port St. Lucie to be essential to the public health, safety, or welfare. H. This amended Development Order shall be binding upon the developer and its assignees or successors in interest. It is understood that any reference herein to any governmental agency shall be construed to mean any future instrumentality which may be created and designated as successor in interest to, or which otherwise possesses any of the powers and duties of any referenced government agency in existen~e on the effective date of this amended Development Order. \IIJ.InOllMAUSC\40 I 023.oSIBLFJ05 I.DOCIBI20/Ó3\S505 I ,0 10200 31 Draft 08/20/03 I. The approval granted by this amended Development Order is conditional and shall not be construed to obviate the duty of the developer to comply with all other applicable local, State, and federal pennitting requirements. J. In the event that any portion or section of this amended Development Order is deemed to be invalid, illegal, or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdiction, such decision shall in no manner affect the remaining portions or sections of this amended Development Order, which shall remain in full force and effect. K. This amended Development Order shall become effective upon adoption. L. Certified copies of this amended Development Order shall be transmitted immediately by certified mail to the Department of Community Affairs, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, and Reserve Homes Ltd., L.P., a Delaware Limited Partnership, the successor in interest to Callaway Land and Cattle Company. M. Within 21 days of the effective date of this resolution amending Resolution No. 89-73, the developer, shall record a notice of adoption of this order in compliance with Chapter 380.06(15)(f), Florida Statutes, with copies of said notice being provided to the Florida Department of Community Affairs, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chainnan Gary D. Charles, SrDoul! Coward Vice-Chairman Paula Le'.yis Commissioner Cliff Bames Commissioner Jolm D. BI1Ù".n Commissioner.Kea Sattler PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this _ day of _,2003. \\ftI-srvO 1 IMAUSCI40 1023vOS\8LFJOS !.00CI8120103\SSOS 1,0 I 0200 32 Draft 08/20/03 REVISED EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION This Description Does Not Depict Lines of Ownership A Parcel of Land Lying in Sections 14,15,16,21,22,23,26, 27, 28, 34 And 35, Township 36 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Begin at the Southwest Corner of Said Section 15; Thence South 89°23'26" East, along the South Line of Said section 15, a Distance of ~12.97 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Westerly Line of a Parcel of Land Described in Official RecofOSB'ook 514, Pages 237-239, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; Thence North 44°46'07" East, along the Westerly Line of Said Parcel of Land, a Distance of 1393.92 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Westerly Line of the Plat ofG. O. Team Industrial Park - Unit One, as Recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 31, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; Thence Northeasterly along the Westerly Line of Said Plat of G. O. Team Industrial Park Unit One the Following Courses and Distances: North 45°13'33" West, 660.03 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Easterly Right- of-way Line of the Florida East Coast Rail way; Thence North 44°45'58" East along Said Easterly Right-of-way Line, a Distance of 120.00 Feet; Thence South 45°13'53" East, 510.04 Feet; Thence South 63°39'59" East, 158.11 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Easterly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement as Recorded in Deed Book 198, Page 1040, Public Records ofSt. Lucie County, Florida. Thence South 44°45'58" West, along Said Westerly Line of Said Plat of G. 0, Team Industrial Park - Unit One and its Northerly Prolongation and the Easterly Line of Said Florida Power and Light Easement, a Distance of 4001.62 Feet; Thence South 89°29'01" East, a Distance of 574.47 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the East Line of Said Section 15, Being the Westerly Line of the Plat of Port St. Lucie Section Forty Four, as Recorded in Plat Book 16, Page 23, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; Thence South 89°29'01" East, along the Northerly Line of Said Plat of Port St. Lucie Section Forty Four, a Distance of 112.97 Feet to the Westerly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement as .Recorded in Official Records Book 90, Page 71, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; Thence South 00°21'26' West, along the Westerly Line of Said Florida Power and Light Easement, a Distance of 3975.26 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the North Line of Said Section 23; Thence North 89°23'16" East, along Said North Line of Section 23, a Distance of 33.09 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Westerly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement, Recorded in Official Records Book 97, Page 504, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; Thence South 00°00'15" West, along the Westerly Line of Said Florida Power and Light Easement, a Distance of 5305.53 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the North Line of Said section 26; Thence South 00°00'02" East along the Westerly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement Recorded in Official Records Book 120, Page 199, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, a Distance of 2,898.15 to the Point of Intersection with the Proposed Westerly Right-of-way Line of the Proposed 1-95 Interchange; Thence Southerly along Said Proposed Right-of-way the Following Courses and Distances; \lftl-srvO IIMAUSCI40 I 02hOS\8LFJOS! ,DOCI8I201OJ\SSOS 1,010200 33 Draft 08/20103 Afore Said Point Being a Point in a Curve Concave to the Northwest to Which a Radial Line Bears South 47°50' 57" East with a Radius of 600.50 Feet; Thence Southwesterly along the Arc of Said Curve, a Distance of 176.71 Feet, 1ñrough a Central Angle of 16° 15'37"; Thence South 59°00'40" West, 462.08 Feet to a Point of Curvature of a Curve Concave to the Southeast, Having a Radius of 621.42 Feet; Thence Southwesterly along the Arc of Said Curve, a Distance of 416.77 Feet 1ñrough a Central Angle of 38°25'38"; Thence South 20°35'02" West, 532.11 Feet to a Point of Curvature of a Curve Concave to the Northwest, Having a Radius of 131.00 Feet, Thence Southwesterly along the Arc of Said Curve 149.35 Feet, Through a Central Angle of 65° 19'11"; Thence South 85°54'13 "West, 388.39 Feet; Thence South 05°58'06" East, 64.11 Feet; Thence South 89°54'13" West, 300.01 Feet; Thence South 00°05'47" East, 140.00 South 05°46'23" West, 64.11 Feet; Thence South 86°05'47" East, 960.95 Feet to a Point of Curvature of a Curve Concave to the Southwest Having a Radius of 600.50 Feet; Thence Southeasterly along the Arc of said Curve a Distance of 626.00 Feet 1ñrough a Central Angle of 59°43'45", to a Point of Compound Curvature of a Curve Concave to the Southwest, Having a Radius of 1295.00 Feet; Thence Southeasterly along the Arc of Said Curve, a Distance of 60.04 Feet 1ñrough a Central Angle of 02°39'23" to the Point ofIntersection with the Westerly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement Recorded in Official Records Book 97, Page 504, Public Records of S1. Lucie County, Florida; Thence South 00°00'02" East, along the Westerly Line of Said Florida Power and Light Easement, a Distance of 411.27 Feet; Thence along the westerly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement Recorded in Official Record Book 468, Page 2897, the Following Courses and Distances: Thence South 00°35'29" East, 1849.11 Feet; Thence South 06°37'22" West, 631.95 Feet; Thence South 12°26'07" West, 640.99 Feet; Thence South 19°28'36" West, 683.65 Feet; Thence South 79°27'56" West, 55.51 Feet; Thence South 10°32'03" East, 50.00 Feet; Thence North 79°27' 56" East, 55.39 Feet; Thence South 40°32'32" East, 146.64 Feet; Thence South 23°34'44" West, a Distance of 422.42 Feet; Thence South 89°52'17" West, 1527.70 Feet; Thence North 40°43'16" West, a Distance of 1216.31 Feet; Thence North 40°04'45" West, a Distance of95.12 Feet; Thence North 44°07'10" West, a Distance of 365.54 Feet; Thence North 44°39'44" West, a Distance of213.66 Feet; Thence North 48°38'45" West, a -Distance of 475-:89-Feet; Thence South 61°51 '31" West, a I)}stance of 188.61 Feet; Thence North 66°42'00" West, a Distance of 79.81 Feet; Thence North 43°42'56" West, a Distance of 2428.68 Feet; Thence North 44°56'04" West~ a Distance of 1054.01 Feet; Thence North 44°47'33" West, a Distance of 636.86 Feet to a Point of Intersection with the Easterly prolongation of the Southerly Line of the Plat of Sabal Creek Phase IV, recorded in Plat Book 34, Pages 17 and 17A, Public Records of Said S1. Lucie County; Thence North 43°08'40" West along Said Easterly prolongation and Said Southerly Line, a Distance of 1026.67 Feet; Thence North 43°34'56" West along Said Southerly Line and the Southerly Line of the Plat of Sabal Creek Phase II, recorded in Plat Book 24, Pages 1, 1 A thru 1 C, Public Records of Said St. Lucie County and the Westerly prolongation of Said Southerly Line, a Distance of 5393.03 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Easterly Right-of-way Line of the Florida East Coast Railway; Thence North 44°45'38" East, along the Easterly Right-of-way Line of the Florida East Coast Railway, a Distance of 8,141.46 Feet to the Point of Intersection With The West Line of Said \\1\1-"",0 I\MAUSCI4O I 023vOSIILFJOS! ,DOC\8I20103\SSOS 1,0 I 0200 34 Draft 08120/03 Section 15; Thence South 00°36'34" West, along the West Line of Said Section 15, a Distance of 110.12 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the South Line of Said Section 15 and the Point of Beginning. " Containing 2,680 Acres More or Less. \\ftl-sMll\MAUSC\40 I 02JvOS\BLFJOS I,DOC\BI201OJ\SSOS 1,0 I 0200 35 Draft 08/20/03 EXHIBIT B , SANDHILL CRANE NESTING MANAGEMENT PLAN The developer shall preserve two areas that provide potential nesting habitat for Sandhill Cranes. These areas are depicted on Map H. Other areas may be defined by the developer as Sandhill Crane nesting sites, including areas designated as mitigation or restoration areas, to reflect documented nesting activity or frequency of use with the approval of the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. Wetlands providing nesting site habitat shall meet the following criteria: · Located within 1/2 mile of a known nest site. · Minimum wetland depressional radius of 100 feet with ordinary high water elevations of 2-3 feet, ordinary low water elevations of 0.5-2 feet and dominated by wetland grasses and forbs (little or no woody vegetation) · Minimum mánaged upland perimeter buffer of 100 feet from jurisdictional wetland limits, managed as open native wetland transition or uplands foraging habitat - This area shall have no more than 20% shrubby understory 3.0 feet or less in height, no forest canopy, and characterized by grassy ground cover. · A visual screen of native vegetation, planted or naturally occurring, at least 5 feet in height and "at least 20 feet in width to provide a visual barrier to surrounding human disturbances including residential home sites. · Where golf course fairways or lakes are adjacent to the nest site wetland, the managed upland perimeter may be reduced to 50 feet in width and the visual screen eliminated provided the width ofthe fairway or lake is at least 150 feet. The upland perimeters and buffers may be modifiOO as appropriate to accommodate landscape_ design or sound environmental planning, so long as the proposed plan will not significantly reduce the area of the wetland nesting depressional, transitional wetland, or upland foraging habitat; and so long as no construction occurs within 300 feet of the designated "center" of the proposed nesting site. Management of the non-golf course portions of the buffers and wetlands shall be pursuant to recommendations developed in consultation with the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. During the months of December 1 to April 30, no construction within 300 feet of preserved or restored wetland shall occur until the wetland has been surveyed for Sandhill Crane nests. In the event that active nests are found, construction shall not occur until July or 90 days after the eggs hatch whichever comes first. \\I\I-s....o I IMAUSC\40 I 023vOS\8LFJ05l.D0C\8/20103\SSOS 1,0 10200 36 J!I c · E :~ . e ~Go .5 C o ;I ~ o Go ., c I! I- æ c · ~ · ., ~ . "'''' ~ ~ 8 § §~ 8 :!: ~ § ii ~i 00 ii 00 000 000 ! :J ~ _ ... tit tit tit tit .._~ tit tit tit .. CD'" ~ Ii ~~ $:!: ~ - CD .... 0;; ~ -tit tlt5! U; ;; fI tit tit - tit tit _ ¡ tit tit tit tit c: 0 ;! 8. e Go .. ... ,§ E .. a: I 11 'E .- i ~' .. .. .5 ... .. '" ~ II .. .. E ..." ,~ ! ... ~ ~ - I III E t'E Q ~ a: ~ 1 i ~ i II 'E i 11 S I) )1 'E 1i ! .. >- .. I! ~ ~ j 'E w ~i a.. J! II J! f I 'E j I ~ ¡ ~ ... a.. ¡¡ ... :3 111111 III ~ Q. .J. .. Ii III ) ~ III IIIÆ ¡¡ III ... j! ~ I Æ I 11 Æ a: I Q. 11 o Go ~ i I ~ S Æ it u 11 I !I III 11 E III i I ~ I ~ !I ~ .. i Æ 1 ~ .. 'g: ¡¡ 'g ~~ !u f ! ~ 'g 5 ~ 'g 1j ~ i .. 51 ::~ li'1I III '" ~:II 11 ¡ ~ ~ 1! .... .. ~ 1~ i >- ,~ ~ .... .. ,~ ,~ :: III ~ I ~ .. 11 , III ~ i .. Ii .. III 0) 0 ~; ~ E i ii a.. 0 ) il Ii ¡ i ~ ¡ ~ :II ~ ) "2) ¡ i I ~ 'g i .J.U ~ ~ ;: .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. 11 .. I . ~ .. .. ~ ~ ... ~ ~~ .. .. .. ~0 W0 o W 0 Z w ...0 ...... 0 Z WW (/) Z(/) W Z c: '& î ~ 0 r ~î f S .. :g ;; ~ Q. I.. " .!! D :s Ef t c i . ~ ~ ~ . ~ . ,!!,~ .. ~ ,~ ! ~ I c: '& I §- i ~ . 'ã. ~ ,~ o¡ Q. ~ j :s 11 . .!II I ~~ I . ~ $ .. I " 1 ~ f II 1 ~ I I ~ . ~ 11 Ii ~ :! il .!II i l ~ $ ,¡ i ~ II it Ii .!II .!II $ ~I~ o j ~~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ i~ .§ :11 i :11 :! :! il ! l~ Ii II ) î I I ) ~ ~ ii j liE It 1: I ~ ~ 88 :!~ !!1:~ 1: :! ~ 8 )8 001 (/) 0 f=(/) ...... Oa: inf=o f=o UO 'E 'E f~ ~ I I ! .. .. !! ! 8. } i Q. ¡¡ ¡¡ i i E E E ¡¡ Ii ~-;- i ~ .. ~ a.. } 8. a: 111111 a: a: 1Ii ¡¡ III 11 11 11 1i 11 illl ~ 1 ~ I 11 ~ ~ I ì ~ ~ .. ~ a: ~ !~ w w u ; III ~ ! ~ '" ~ 11 ~ ~ III III f I I .. .. 11 i a.. a.. ~ i Q. W !I II j I ~~ ~ ~ ~ '" i i1 ~ z z Eu III " - -z z J~ i i 1! i i i 81 1 ! i ~~ ~1 "2 ¡. .. ...a: III III ... "2 a: .. .. l! .. 1 i i i i i 'E 'E .. .:! 'E ~ I i I ~ ~ 1) I¡ ~ ~ 'E .. i ~ 'E jl ~ 2 I j II } } II 'E } i II I I ~ 'E ÆÆ } .z Æ ÆÆ !Æ ¡¡ ... j Æ iÆ Æ }i ¡¡ 1 III III i 11 11 1i I 11 11 11 1õ 11 ~I If I ! 1i ¡¡ Æ 11 I ¡¡ ¡¡ ~ ~ ¡ f ~ ~ ~~ ~~ ~III ~ ~ 111111 'g i ii i i i I 'g 'g .. :I 'g ,§ ! !! !! <:! 'g :i 'g 'g .... .. 'g .. .. .. .. .. .. .... ... ~ I .... .... i .. ... 11 .... .... .. ,~ i~ .... ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ .. oJ .. ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ êiiùŠ ¡¡¡¡¡¡ ¡¡¡~ .. .. .. 00 (/) (;(/) o 0 o a.. 0 a.. Q. a.. a.. a.. a.. " Õ ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! ! "'''' "': '" '" ! ! I! I ::I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z: :!C :!C :!C .. . . ! .. .. ... .. .. ...... "rr "Ii ftft riri "'" .; .. ~~ ~ ~ ~~ .. ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ f= ... tS ~ )'15 t~ ! '15 !) ii ~ ;i~ -U ~ l ïi ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ f ~ §." ~O i ~ ,Ii l ~ i i ~; ~:- ;'~ ~ 04 .3 i~.. ~ B '~ë ûS j.c i= u:í[ · 15 :sz'; Ii ð'g i a.. ~Ii :! E0 ~ '15!1 a!J! ~ ~ = '> ,Ii! 2t iI II u ,g.! i~ .SiJ!! = ~ i~ ~~ ~i ; ti =8 :2: .E·!! ~ ~ "... ~l! .~ II 8 i~ ." ~~ i 'g ii It ~i ;I ... ~û ~II ,1i\5 ! ~ l~ ~~ jf¡ i ! ';i ~~ ~~ i ~ !¡ If =! I i ~f 61 Is ~ a.. ë c: .. E :;: ,\11 II! ~ '_~~ ¡~ i.3 ~ ~ -ti ~ éñ0 1! e 'i '2' i ¡ ª '~ ::! ~ fi~ .~ ~~ M ¡;¡ ~~ !.z ~;¡¡ ~ 9- ~ u ! æ ,"; . 15 :;¡ Õ !I!~ ..;Jgi~ _ ,,¡:: .......E" z: ! I'¡ ,~iui&~ !f o ... :Eã"U ~ ~¡ ~ '151!a..~~ = 5i~ ,,;s ïit'15ls § ['15 el'}' ~ i ' ; ;,'gl~ï ~ ~ .. ...., -!.. if {(!~11~~1 i ¡f i~il¡¡~ ii ,Ii"" :! !U~~;J ~~ .liaoi='g",~ . ,~~ if~it....ii :!i i'i Ifl¡~¡¡¡j~ ! ;1 ~~~f"~f; ~ i i~ :i8u!~oi ~ l II ,il~!i~!1 : I '~liil~~II~~ i J i~~!..g~,¡¡.z~! 1 ~ 1~~¡¡2fiui~~¡¡¡i i : I! I! ,Ii I ~ã~i15~ ,( f f1!11 ~~~"~RI <ill.'!! 5 il ·11 1!~'!6fEE~:!2'~~c!6~ I 1o~f¡:;~8~i~~~~< - . ¡ ~<éD Û Ô wU: G' x The Reserve DRI Comparison of Affordable Housing Demand Original vs. Revised Development Program Table 1 below compares the original development program for The Reserve DRI with the revised program being proposed with respect to the uses that will generate demand for residential units affordable to households of very low, low and moderate income. Table 1 Comparative Development Programs The Reserve DRI Use Oriainal Proaram Revised Program Retail 290,000 S.F 290,000 S.F Office 100,000 S,F. 100,000 S.F. Industrial 1,600,000 S.F. 500,000 S.F. Hotel 250 rooms 250 rooms Recreation 4 coif courses w/ clubhouse 4 coif courses w/ clubhouse Active/Passive Area * Residential 4,100 units 3,200 units * For the purpose of this analysis, this element has been assumed to be a youth sports complex, As shown in Table 2 on the page following, the original development would generate demand for 1,376 affordable housing units. The revised program's demand will be for only slightly more than 55 percent that number, 784 units. The basis of this conclusion is provided in Tables 3.1 - 3,6 (original program) and 4.1 - 4.7 (revised program). Table 2 The Reserve DRI Comparative Affordable Housing Demand Original vs, Revised Development Program Income Cateaorv Original Revised Very Low Income Proaram Proaram Chanae $11,606* 123 123 0 $13,750 86 83 (3) $16,250 35 29 (6) $18,419 39 38 (1 ) $18,750 37 25 (12) $21 ,250 40 22 (18) $21,821 26 25 (1 ) $23,575 67 II (36) Total 453 376 (77) Low Income $25,789 9 7 (2) $25,825 120 46 (74) $28,250 119 49 (70) $29,756 11 6 (5) $30,750 121 37 (84) $33,250 61 30 (31) $33,724 12 5 (7) $35,750 51 30 (21) $37,414 20 9 (11 ) $38,220 45 20 (25) Total 569 239 (330) Moderate Income $40,984 62 28 (34) $42,210 21 12 (9) $43,250 21 11 (10) $44,833 59 26 (33) $45,750 19 7 (12) $48,250 10 6 (4) $48,800 61 27 (34) $50,750 10 6 (4) $52;768 34 15 (19) $53,250 10 6 (4) $55,750 10 6 (4) $56,735 29 15 (14) $58,080 ª ! œ. Total 354 169 (185) Total Demand 1.376 784 (592) .. Midpoint between $10,712 (minimum wage of $5,15/hour for 40 hours/week,52 weekslyear) and $12,499. Source: Miami Economic Associates, Inc. Table 3.1 The Reserve DRI Original Development Program Affordable Housing Demand Households Income Cateaorv Retail Office Industrial Hotel Golf Club Total Very Low Income $11,606 * 61 2 5 47 8 123 $13,750 61 2 7 11 5 86 $16,250 14 2 14 3 2 35 $18,419 19 0 2 15 3 39 $18,750 7 7 20 2 -1 37 $21,250 3 7 27 2 1 40 $21,821 19 0 2 3 2 26 $23,575 ª I 54 ~ 1 67 Total 187 27 ill 85 23 453 Low Income $25,789 4 0 4 1 0 9 $25,825 3 11 105 1 0 120 $28,250 1 11 105 1 1 119 $29,756 2 2 7 0 0 11 $30,750 1 14 105 1 0 121 $33,250 1 14 44 1 1 61 $33,724 1 2 9 0 0 12 $35,750 1 14 35 1 0 51 $37,414 1 2 17 0 0 20 $38,220 1 I 35 1 1 45 Total 16 77 466 I ª 569 Moderate Income $40,984 3 6 53 0 0 62 $42,210 0 6 15 0 0 21 $43,250 0 6 15 0 0 21 $44,833 0 6 53 0 0 59 $45,750 0 4 15 0 0 19 $48,250 0 3 7 0 0 10 $48,800 0 8 53 0 0 61 $50,750 0 3 7 0 0 10 $52,768 0 8 26 0 ---0 34 $53,250 0 3 7 0 0 10 $55,750 0 3 7 0 0 10 $56,735 0 8 21 0 0 29 $58,080 º 1 I º º ª Total ª 65 286 º º 354 Total Demand 206 169 883 92 26 1.376 * Midpoint between $10,712 (minimum wage of $5,15/hour for 40 hourslweek,52 weeks/year) and $12,499, Source: Miami Economic Associates, Ine, Table 3.2 The Reserve DRI Original Development Program Employee Wage Distribution Retail Wa Distribution 2 3 4 5 6 10 Number of Heads of Worker Worker Wa Ran . Mid Int Employee. Total Wa es Household HH Income HH Income Very Low Income Less than $12,499 $11,606' 225 $2,611,350 80 61 $11,606 19 $18,419 $12,500-$14,999 $13,750 225 $3,093,750 80 61 $13,750 19 $21,821 $15,000-$17,499 $16,250 50 $812,500 18 14 $16,250 4 $25,789 $17,500-$19,999 $18,750 25 $468,750 9 7 $18,750 2 $29,756 $20,000-$22,499 $21,250 10 $212,500 4 3 $21,250 1 $33,724 $22,500-$24,650 $23,575 10 $235,750 4 3 $23,575 1 $37,414 Low Income $24,651-$26,999 $25,825 10 $258,250 6 3 $25,825 3 $40,984 $27,000-$29,499 $28,250 2 $56,500 1 1 $28,250 0 $44,833 $29,500-$31,999 $30,750 2 $61,500 1 1 $30,750 0 $48,800 $32,000-$34,499 $33,250 2 $66,500 1 1 $33,250 0 $52,768 $34,500-$36,999 $35,750 2 $71,500 1 1 $35,750 0 $56,735 $37,ooO-$39,~ $38,220 2 $76,440 1 1 $38,220 0 $60,655 Moderate Income $39,441-$41,999 $42,210 2 $84,420 0 $42,210 $66,987 $42,000-$44,499 $43,250 2 $86,500 0 $43,250 $68,638 $44,500-$46,999 $45,750 2 $91,500 0 $45,750 $72,605 $47,000-$49,499 $48,250 1 $48,250 0 $48,250 $76,573 $49,500-$51,999 $50,750 1 $50,750 0 $50,750 $80,540 $52,000-$54,499 $53,250 1 $53,250 0 $53,250 $84,508 $54,500-$56,999 $55,750 1 $55,750 0 $55,750 $88,475 $57,000-$59,160 $58,080 1 $58,080 0 $58,080 $92,173 Middle Income/Over $59,161 and over $75,000 ~ $300,000 N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A 580 $8,853,790 $8,950,560 Moderate 69,3% Median Income: 1.9,300 Single/Multi-worker households Average Retail Trade Income: $15,432 .. Very Low Low Moderate 75,9%124,1% 62,6%137,4% 42,4%157,6% Additional Income 58,7% . Midpoint between $10,712 (minimum wage of $5, 15/hour for 40 hourslWeek, 52 weekslyear) and $12,499, .. 290,000 square feel with 2 workersl1000 square feet ... Based 2nd Quarter 2002 ES 202 Data for the retail, restaurant and personal services sectors on a weighted-average basis, Column.: 1 Income thresholds (based on area median income) 2 Wages broken down In increments of $2,500 3 Midpoint of wage ranges 4 Number of employees projected to be in each wage range 5 Total wages of aU employees in each wage range 6 Heads of Household by income (taken from employees in Column 4) 7 Single worker households (local percentage, from the Census) 8 Single worker household Income (same as midpoint in CO/UrM 3) 9 Multi-worker households (local percentage, from the Census) 10 Multi'worker household income (midpoint In ColurM 3 multiplied by a percentege of additional Income, from the Census) Source: Miami Econom Ie Associates, Inc, Table 3.3 The Reserve DRI Original Development Program Employee Wage Distribution otrlc. WI Distribution 2 3 4 5 6 10 Number of Heads of Worker Worker Wa Rln s Mid Int Employe.s Total Wa es Household HH Income HH Income Very Low Income Less than $12,499 $11,606" 5 $5B,030 2 2 $11,606 0 $1B,419 $12,500-$14,999 $13,750 5 $68,750 2 2 $13,750 0 $21,821 $15,000-$17,499 $16,250 5 $81 ,250 2 2 $16.250 0 $25,789 $17,500-$19,999 $18,750 25 $468,750 9 7 $18,750 2 $29,756 $20,000-$22.499 $21,250 25 $531,250 9 7 $21,250 2 $33,724 $22,500-$24,650 $23,575 25 $589,375 9 7 $23,575 2 $37,414 Low Income $24,651-$26,999 $25,825 30 $774,750 17 11 $25,B25 6 $40,984 $27,000-$29,499 $28.250 30 $847,500 17 11 $28,250 6 $44,833 $29,500-$31,999 $30,750 40 $1,230,000 22 14 $30,750 8 $48,800 $32,000-$34,499 $33.250 40 $1,330,000 22 14 $33,250 8 $52,768 $34,500-$36,999 $35,750 40 $1,430,000 22 14 $35,750 8 $56,735 $37,000-$39,440 $38,220 20 $764.400 11 7 $38,220 4 $60,655 Moderate Income $39,441-$41,999 $42,210 20 $844,200 14 6 $42,210 8 $66,987 $42,000-$44,499 $43,250 20 $865.000 14 6 $43,250 8 $68,638 $44,500-$46.999 $45,750 15 $686,250 10 4 $45,750 6 $72,605 $47,000-$49,499 $48,250 10 $482,500 7 3 $48,250 4 $76,573 $49,500-$51,999 $50,750 10 $507,500 7 3 $50,750 4 $80,540 $52,000-$54,499 $53,250 10 $532,500 7 3 $53,250 4 $84,508 $54,500-$56,999 $55,750 10 $557,500 7 3 $55,750 4 $88,475 $57,000-$59,160 $58,080 5 $290,400 3 1 $58,OBO 2 $92,173 Middle Income/Over $59,161 and over $80,000 10 $800.000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 400 $13,739,905 $13,753,200 Moderate 69,3% Median Income: 149.300 Single/Multi-worker households Average OfIIce Trade Income: $34,383 .. Very Low Low Moderate 75,9%124,1% 62,6%137,4% 42,4%157,6% Additional Income 58,7% . Midpoint between $10,712 (minimum wage of $5,151hour for 40 hourslweek, 52 weekslyear) and $12,499, - 100,000 square feetwjth 4 workers/10CO square feet ... Based 2nd Quarter 2002 ES 202 Data on a weighted average basis for the Finance, Insurance and Real Estate Industry and Professional Services on a weighted average basis, Column.: 1 Income thresholds (based on aree median income) 2 Wages broken down in increments of $2,500 3 Midpoint of wage ranges 4 Number of employees projected to be In eech wage range 5 Total wages of all employees In each wage range 6 Heeds of Household by income (taken from employees in Column 4) 7 Single worker households (Iocel percentage, from the Census) 8 Single worker household Income (seme es midpoint in Column 3) 9 Multi-worker households (locel percentage, from the Census) 10 Multi-worker household income (midpoint in Column 3 multiplied by a percentage of additional income, from the Census) Source: Miemi Econom ic AssocIales, Inc, Wa~e Distribution 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ,..nll'· MUItl- Number rA Hllds rA Worker Worker Waae Ranoes MidDOlnt Employees Total Waaes Household HH Income HH Income Very Low Income Less than $12,499 $11,606· 20 $232,120 7 5 $11,606 2 $18,419 $12,500-$14,999 $13,750 25 $343,750 9 7 $13,750 2 $21,821 $15,000..$17,499 $16,250 50 $812,500 18 14 $16,250 4 $25,789 $17,500-$19,999 $18,750 75 $1,406,250 27 20 $18,750 7 $29,756 $20,000-$22,499 $21,250 100 $2,125,000 36 27 $21,250 9 $33,724 $22,500-$24,650 $23,575 200 $4,715,000 71 54 $23,575 17 $37,414 Low Income $24,651-$26,999 $25,825 300 $7,747,500 168 105 $25,825 53 $40,984 $27,000-$29,499 $28,250 300 $8,475,000 168 105 $28,250 53 $44,833 $29,500-$31,999 $30,750 300 $9,225,000 168 105 $30,750 53 $48,800 $32,000-$34,499 $33,250 125 $4,156,250 70 44 $33,250 26 $52,768 $34,500-$36,999 $35,750 100 $3,575,000 56 35 $35,750 21 $56,735 $37,000-$39,440 $38,220 100 $3,822,000 56 35 $38,220 21 $60,655 - Moderate Income ~ $39,441·$41,999 $42,210 50 $2,110,500 35 15 $42,210 20 $66,987 $42,000-$44,499 $43,250 50 $2,162,500 35 15 $43,250 20 $68,638 $44,500-$46,999 $45,750 50 $2,287,500 35 15 $45,750 20 $72,605 $47,000-$49,499 $48,250 25 $1,206,250 17 7 $48,250 10 $76,573 $49,500-$51,999 $50,750 25 $1,268,750 17 7 $50,750 10 $80,540 $52,000-$54,499 $53,250 25 $1,331,250 17 7 $53,250 10 $84,508 $54,500-$56,999 $55,750 25 $1,393,750 17 7 $55,750 10 $88,475 $57,000-$59,160 $58,080 25 $1,452,000 17 7 $58,080 10 $92,173 Middle Income/Over $68,280 and over $80,000 30 $2,400,000 NIA NIA NIA NIA NIA (A) Total employees and wages of this model 2,000 $62,247,870 (8) Total wa!les of 2,000 emplovees .. @ $31,137 $62,274,000 Table 3." The Reserve DRI Orlgllllll Development Program Employee Wage Distribution Industrial Headship rates for 51. Lucie County Very Low Low 35,7% 56,0% Moderate 69,3% Medlu Income: '''',300 SinglelMulti-WOrker households Very Low Low 75,9%124,1% 62,6%137,4% Moderate 42,4%157,6% Averatle Industrial Income: $31,137 .. Additional Income 58,7% . Midpoint between $10,712 (minimum wage of$5.15/hourfor 40 hourslweek, 52 weekslyear) and $12,499, .. 1,600,000 square feet with 1,25 workersl1 000 square feet ... Based 2nd Quarter 2002 ES 202 Data on a weighted average basis for the manufacturing and wholesale trade sectors on a weighted-average basis, Columns: 1 Income thresholds (based on area median income) 2 Wages broken down in increments of $2,500 3 Midpoint of wage ranges .. Number of employees projected to be in each wage range 5 Total wages of all employees In each wage range 6 Heads of Household by income (laken from employees in Column 4) 7 Single worker households (local percentage, from the Census) 8 Single worker household income (same as midpoint in Column 3) 9 Multi-worker households (local percentage, from the Census) 10 Multi-worker household income (midpoint in Column 3 multiplied by a percentage of additional Income, from the Census) Source: Miami Econom Ie Associates, Inc. Wage Distribution 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ~Ingle MUItl- Number d Heads d Worker Worker Wage Ranoas MldDOlnt Employees Total Waoes Household HH Income HH Income Very Low Income Less than $12,499 $11,606· 175 $2,031,050 62 47 $11,606 15 $18,419 $12,500-$14,999 $13,750 40 $550,000 14 11 $13,750 3 $21,821 $15,000-$17,499 $16,250 10 $162,500 4 3 $16,250 1 $25,789 $17,500-$19,999 $18,750 5 $93,750 2 2 $18,750 0 $29,756 $20,000-$22,499 $21,250 5 $106,250 2 2 $21,250 0 $33,724 $22,500-$24,650 $23,575 5 $117,875 2 2 $23,575 0 $37,414 Low Income $24.651·$26,999 $25,825 1 $25,825 1 1 $25,825 0 $40,984 $27,000-$29,499 $28,250 1 $28,250 1 1 $28,250 0 $44,833 $29,500-$31,999 $30,750 1 $30,750 1 1 $30.750 0 $48,800 $32,000-$34,499 $33,250 1 $33,250 1 1 $33,250 0 $52,768 $34,500-$36,999 $35,750 1 $35,750 1 1 $35,750 0 $56,735 $37,000-$39,440 $38,220 1 $38,220 1 1 $38,na- 0 $60,655 Moderate Income $39,441-$41,999 $42,210 0 $0 0 0 $42,210 0 $66,987 $42,000-$44,499 $43,250 1 $43,250 1 0 $43,250 1 $68,638 $44,500-$46,999 $45,750 0 $0 0 0 $45,750 0 $72,605 $47,000-$49,499 $48,250 1 $48,250 1 0 $48,250 1 $76,573 $49,500-$51,999 $50,750 0 $0 0 0 $50,750 0 $80,540 $52,000-$54,499 $53,250 1 $53,250 1 0 $53,250 1 $84.508 $54,500-$56.999 $55,750 0 $0 0 0 $55,750 0 $88,475 $57,000-$59,160 $58,080 0 $0 0 0 $58,080 0 $92,173 Middle Income/Over $68,280 and over $80,000 1 $80,000 NlA NlA NlA N/A NlA (A) Total employees and wages of this model 250 $3,478,220 B) Total wages of 250 employees - @ $13,960 $3,490,000 Table 3.& The Reserve DRI Original Development Program Employ" Wage DlstrlbuUon Hotel Headship rates for 51. Lucie County Very Low Low 35,7% 56,0% Moderate 69,3% Median Income: $49,300 5inglelMulti,worker households Very Low Low 75,9%124,1% 62,6%137,4% Average Hotel Income: $13,960 .. Moderate 42,4%157,6% Additional Income 58.7% . Midpoint be1ween $10,712 (minimum wage of $5, l5lhour for 40 hours/week, 52 weekslyear) and $12,499. .. 250-room hotel with 1 worker/room ... Based 2nd Quarter 2002 ES 202 Data for accommodations, Columns: 1 Income thresholds (based on anta median income) 2 Wages broken down in Incntments of $2,500 3 Midpoint of wage ranges 4 Number of employees projected to be In each wage range 5 Total wages of all employees In each wage range 6 Heads of Household by Income (taken from employees in Column 4) 7 Single worker households (local percentage, from the Census) 8 Single wor1cer household Income (seme as midpoint In ColulM 3) 9 Multi-worker households (local percenlage, from the Census) 10 Multi-worker household Income (midpoint In Column 3 multiplied by a percenlage of additional income, from the 'Census) Source: Miami Economic Associates, 100, Wage Distribution 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .:lingle mu",- Number 01 Heads 01 Worker Worker Wage Ranges Midpoint Employees Total Wages Household HH Income HH Income Very Low Income Less than $12,499 $11,606· 30 $348,180 11 8 $11,606 3 $18,419 $12,500-$14,999 $13,750 20 S275,ooo 7 5 $13,750 2 $21,821 $15,000-$17,499 $16,250 7 $113,750 2 2 $16,250 0 $25,789 $17,500-$19,999 $18,750 3 $56,250 1 1 $18,750 0 $29,756 $20,000-$22,499 $21,250 2 $42,500 1 1 $21,250 0 $33,724 $22,500-$24,650 $23,575 2 $47,150 1 1 $23,575 0 $37,414 Low Income $24,651-$26,999 $25,825 0 $0 0 0 $25,825 0 $40,984 $27,000-$29,499 $28,250 1 $28,250 1 1 $28,250 0 $44,833 $29,500-$31,999 $30,750 0 $0 0 0 $30,750 0 $48,800 $32,000-$34,499 $33,250 1 $33,250 1 1 $33,250 0 $52,768 $34,500-$36,999 $35,750 0 $0 0 0 $35,750 0 $56,735 $37,000-$39,440 $38,22L- 1 $38,220 1 1 $38,220 0 $60,655 Moderate Income $39,441-$41,999 $42,210 1 $42,210 1 0 $42,210 1 $66,987 $42,000-$44,499 $43,250 0 $0 0 0 $43,250 0 $68,638 $44,500-$46,999 $45,750 0 $0 0 0 $45,750 0 $72,605 $47,000-$49,499 $48,250 1 $48,250 1 0 $48,250 1 $76,573 $49,500-$51,999 $50,750 0 $0 0 0 $50,750 0 $80,540 $52,000-$54,499 $53,250 0 $0 0 0 $53,250 0 $84,508 $54,500-$56,999 $55,750 0 $0 0 0 $55,750 0 $88,475 $57,000-$59,160 $58,080 0 $0 0 0 $58,080 0 $92,173 Middle Income/Over $68,280 and over $80,000 1 $80,000 NIA N/A N/A N/A N/A (A) Total employees and wages ofthls model 70 $1,153,010 B) Total wages 0170 employees·· @$16,492 $1,154,440 Table 3,6 The Reserve DRI Original Development Program Emptoyee Wage Distribution Golf Club Headship rates for Sl Lucie County Very Low Low 35,7% 56,0% Moderate 69,3% Madlan Income: 149,300 SinglelMu~i-worker households Very Low Low 75,9%124,1% 62,6%137,4% Average Golf Club Incoma: $16,492 .. Moderate 42,4%/57.6% Additional Income 58,7% . Midpoint between $10,712 (minimum wage of $5,151hour for 40 hourslweek, 52 weeks/year) and $12,499, .. 70 employees based on actual ... Based 2nd Quarter 2002 ES 202 Data for amusements and recreation sector Columns: 1 Income thresholds (based on area median income) 2 Wages broken down In increments of $2,500 3 Midpoint of wage ranges 4 Number of employees projected to be in each wage range 5 Total wages of all employees In each wage range 6 Heads of Household by income (taken from employees in Column 4) 7 Single worker households (local percentage, from the Census) 8 Single worker household income (same as midpoint in Column 3) 9 Multi-wortcar households (Iocel percentage, from the Census) '0 Multi-worker household Income (midpoint in Column 3 multiplied by a percentage of additional Income, from the Census) Source: Miami Economic Associates, Inc, Table 4.1 The Reserve DRI Revised Development Program Affordable Housing Demand Households Youth Sports Income Cateaorv Retail Office Industrial Hotel Complex Golf Club Total Very Low Income $11,606 * 61 2 2 47 3 8 123 $13,750 61 2 2 11 2 5 83 $16,250 14 2 7 3 1 2 29 -----$18,419 19 0 0 15 1 3 38 $18,750 7 7 7 ---L 1 1 25 $21,250 3 7 8 2 ---- 1 1 22 $21,821 19 0 0 3 1 2 25 $23,575 ª Z 17 ~ 1 1 -ª1 Total 187 27 43 85 11 23 376 Low Income $25,789 4 0 2 1 0 0 7 $25,825 3 11 31 1 0 0 46 $28,250 1 11 34 1 1 1 49 $29,756 2 2 2 0 0 0 6 $30,750 1 14 21 1 0 0 37 $33,250 1 14 13 1 0 1 30 $33,724 1 2 2 0 0 0 5 $35,750 1 14 13 1 1 0 30 $37.414 1 2 6 0 0 0 9 $38,220 1 Z 10 1 Q 1 20 Total 16 77 134 Z ~ ª 239 Moderate Income $40,984 3 6 19 0 0 0 28 $42,210 0 6 6 0 0 0 12 $43,250 0 6 5 0 0 0 11 $44,833 0 6 20 0 0 0 26 $45,750 0 4 3 0 0 0 7 $48,250 0 3 3 0 0 0 6 ----$48,800 0 8 19 0 0 0 27 $50,750 0 3 3 -0- 0 0 6 $52,768 0 8 7 0 0 0 15 $53,250 0 3 3 0 0 0 6 $55,750 0 3 3 0 0 0 6 $56,735 0 8 7 0 0 0 15 $58,080 Q 1 ª Q Q Q 1 Total ª 65 101 Q Q Q 169 Total Demand 206 169 278 92 13 26 784 * Midpoint between $10,712 (minimum wage of $5.15/hour for 40 hourslweek,52 weekslyear) and $12,499, Source: Miami Economic Associates, Inc, Table 4.2 The Reserve DRI Revised Development Program Employ.. Wage Distribution Retail Wa Distribution 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Number of Heads of Worker Worker Employ... Total Wa e. Household HH Income HH Income Very Low Income 225 $2,611,350 80 61 $11,606 19 $18,419 225 $3,093,750 80 61 $13,750 19 $21,821 50 $812,500 18 14 $16,250 4 $25,789 25 $468,750 9 7 $18,750 2 $29,756 10 $212,500 4 3 $21,250 1 $33,724 10 $235,750 4 3 $23,575 1 $37,414 Low Income $24,651-$26,999 $25,825 10 $258,250 6 3 $25,825 3 $40,984 $27,000-$29,499 $28,250 2 $56,500 1 1 $28,250 0 $44,833 $29,500-$31,999 $30,750 2 $61,500 1 1 $30,750 0 $48,800 $32,000-$34,499 $33,250 2 $66,500 1 1 $33,250 0 $52,768 $34,500-$36,999 $35,750 2 $71,500 1 1 $35,750 0 $56,735 $37,000-$39,440 $38,220 2 $76,440 1 1 $38,220 0 $60,655 Moderate Income $39,4~99 $42,210 2 $84,420 0 $42,210 $66,987 $42,000-$44;499- $43,250 2 $86,500 0 $43,250 $68,638 $44,500-$46,999 $45,750 2 $91,500 0 $45,750 $72,605 $47,000-$49,499 $48,250 1 $48,250 0 $48,250 $76,573 $49,500-$51,999 $50,750 1 $50,750 0 $50,750 $80,540 $52,000-$54,499 $53,250 1 $53,250 0 $53,250 $84,508 $54,500-$56,999 $55,750 1 $55,750 0 $55,750 $88,475 $57,000-$59,160 $58,080 1 $58,080 0 $58,080 $92,173 Middle Income/Over $59,161 and over $75,000 ~ $300,000 NlA N/A N/A N/A N/A 580 $8,853,790 $8,950,560 Moderate 69,3%' Median Income: '4',300 SlnglelMulti-worker households Average Retail Trade Income: $15,432 00 Very Low Low Moderate 75,9%124,1% 62,6%137,4% 42,4%157,6% Additional Income 58,7% o Midpoint between 510,712 (minimum wage of $5,I5lhour for 40 hourslweek, 52 weeks/year) and 512,499, .. 290,000 squara feet with 2 workers/1000 square feet - Basad 2nd Quarter 2002 ES 202 Data for the retail, restaurant and personal services sectors on a weighted-average basis, Columns: 1 Income thresholds (based on araa median Income) , 2 Wages broken down in increments of $2,500 3 Midpoint of wage ranges 4 Number of employees projected to be In each wage range 5 ToIIIl wages of all employe.. in each wage range 6 Heads of Household by income (taken from employees in Column 4) 7 Single worker households (local percentage, from the Census) 8 Single worker household income (same as midpoint in Colurm 3) 9 Multi-worker households Oocal percentage, from the Census) 10 Multi-worker household income (midpoint In Column 3 multiplied by a percentage of additional income, from the Census) Sourçe: Miami Economic Associates, Inc, Table 4.3 The Reserve DRI Revised Development Program Employee Wage DistribUtIon omce Wa Distribution 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 I U - Number of Heads of Worker Worker Employees Total Wa es Household HH Income HH Income Very Low Income 5 $58,030 2 2 $11,606 0 $18,419 5 $68,750 2 2 $13,750 0 $21,821 5 $81,250 2 2 $16,250 0 $25,789 25 $468,750 9 7 $18,750 2 $29,756 25 $531,250 9 7 $21,250 2 $33,724 25 $589,375 9 7 $23,575 2 $37,414 Low Income $24,651-$26,999 $25,825 30 $774,750 17 11 $25,825 6 $40,984 $27,000-$29,499 $28,250 30 $847,500 17 11 $28,250 6 $44,833 $29,500-$31,999 $30,750 40 $1,230,000 22 14 $30,750 8 $48,800 $32,000-$34,499 $33,250 40 $1,330,000 22 14 $33,250 8 $52,768 $34,500-$36,999 $35,750 40 $1,430,000 22 14 $35,750 8 $56,735 $37,000-$39,440 $38,220 20 $764,400 11 7 $38,220 4 $60,65 Moderate Income $39,441-$41,999 $42,210 20 $844,200 14 6 $42,210 8 $66,987 $42,000-$44,499 $43,250 20 $865,000 14 6 $43,250 8 $68,638 $44,500-$46,999 $45,750 15 $686,250 10 4 $45,750 6 $72,605 $47,000-$49,499 $48,250 10 $482,500 7 3 $48,250 4 $76,573 $49,500-$51,999 $50,750 10 $507,500 7 3 $50,750 4 $80,540 $52,000-$54,499 $53,250 10 $532,500 7 3 $53,250 4 $84,508 $54,500-$56,999 $55,750 10 $557,500 7 3 $55,750 4 $88,475 $57,000-$59,160 $58,080 5 $290,400 3 1 $58,080 2 $92,173 MIddle Income/Over $59,161 and over $80,000 1Q $800,000 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A 400 $13,739,905 $13,753,200 Moderate 69,3% Median Income: t49,300 SinglelMulti-worker households Average otIIcelncome: 534,383 .. Very Low Low Moderate 75,9%124,1% 62,6%137,4% 42,4%157,6% Additional Income 58,7% . Midpoint between 510,712 (minimum wage of 55, 15/hour for 40 hoursJweek, 52 weekslyear) and 512,499, .. 100,000 squaRl feet with 4 workers/1000 square feet ... Based 2nd Quarter 2002 ES 202 Data on a weighted average basis for the Finance, Insurance and Real Estate Industry and Professional Services on a weighted average basis, Columns: 1 Income thresholds (based on area median income) 2 Wages broken down in increments of $2,500 3 Midpoint of wage ranges 4 Number of employees projected to be In each wage range 5 Total wag.. of all employe.. in each wage range 6 Heeds of Household by income (taken from employees In Column 4) 7 Single worker households (local percentage, fIom the Census) 8 Single worker household income (seme as midpoint in Column 3) 9 Multi-worker households Vocal percentage, from the Census) 10 Multl-worker household income (midpoint in Column 3 multiplied by a pen:entage of additional Income, fIom the Census) Soun:e: Miami Economic Associates, Inc, Table ~.~ The Reserve DRI Revised Development Program Employee Wage Distribution Industrial Wa Distribution 2 3 4 5 6 10 Number at Heads d Worker Worker Employees Total Wa IS Household HH Income HH Income Very Low Income 5 $58,030 2 2 $11,606 ° $18,419 6 $82,500 2 2 $13,750 0 $21,821 24 $390,000 9 7 $16,250 2 $25,789 24 $450,000 9 7 $1B,750 2 $29,756 28 $595,000 10 8 $21,250 2 $33,724 64 $1,508,800 23 17 $23,575 6 $37,414 Low Income $24,651-$26,999 $25,825 90 $2,324,250 50 31 $25,825 19 $40,984 $27,000-$29,499 $28,250 96 $2,712,000 54 34 $28,250 20 $44,833 $29,500-$31,999 $30,750 90 $2,767,500 50 31 $30,750 19 $48,800 $32,000-$34,499 $33,250 36 $1,197,000 20 13 $33,250 7 $52,768 $34,500-$36,999 $35,750 36 $1,287,000 20 13 $35,750 7 $56,735 $37,000-$39,440 $38,220 28 $1,010;160-- 16 10 $38,220 6 $60,655 Moderate Income $39,441-$41,999 $42,210 20 $844,200 14 6 $42,210 8 $66,987 $42,000-$44,499 $43,250 16 $692,000 11 5 $43,250 6 $68,638 $44,500-$46,999 $45,750 12 $549,000 8 3 $45,750 5 $72,605 $47,000-$49,499 $48,250 8 $386,000 6 3 $48,250 3 $76,573 $49,500-$51,999 $50,750 B $406,000 6 3 $50,750 3 $80,540 $52,000-$54,499 $53,250 8 $426,000 6 3 $53,250 3 $84,508 $54,500-$56,999 $55,750 8 $446,000 6 3 $55,750 3 $88,475 $57,000-$59,160 $58,OBO 8 $464,640 6 3 $58,080 3 $92,173 Middle Income/Over $68,280 and over $80,000 1Q $800,000 N/A N/A NIA N/A N/A 625 $19,456,080 $19,460,625 Moderate 69,3% Median Income: $49,300 SinglelMulti-worker households Averagelnduslrlallncome: $31,137 .. Very Low Low Moderate 75,9%124,1% 62,6%ß7,4% 42,4%157,6% Additional Income 58,7% . Midpoint between $10,712 (minimum wage of $5,15/hourfor 40 hourslweek, 52 weeks/year) and $12,499, .. 500,000 square feet with 1,25 workers/10oo square feet - Based 2nd Quarter 2002 ES 202 Data on a weighted average basis for the manufacturing and wholesale trade sectors on a weighted-average basis, Columns: 1 Income thresholds (based on area median income) 2 Wages broken down in Increments of $2,500 3 Midpoint of wage ranges 4 Number of employees projected to be In each wage range 5 Total wages of all employees in each wage range 6 Heads of Household by income (taken from employees In Column 4) 7 Single worker households (local Pln:entage, from the Census) 8 Single worker household income (same as midpoint in Column 3) 9 Multi-worker households (local percentage, from the Census) 1 0 Multi-worker household Income (midpoint in ColulM 3 multiplied by a pen:entage of addltion,1 income, from the Census) Source: Miami Economic Associates, Inc, Waae Distribution 1 2 3 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 ;:jlng,e Mum- Number of Heads of Worker Worker Wage Ranaes MldDOint Employees Total Waae. Household HH Income HH Income Very Low Income Less than $12,"99 $11,606" 175 $2.031.050 62 ..7 $11.606 15 $18."19 $12,500-$1".999 $13.750 ..0 $550,000 1.. 11 $13.750 3 $21,821 $15,000-$17."99 $16.250 10 $162,500 3 3 $16.250 1 $25.789 $17.500-$19,999 $18,750 5 $93,750 2 2 $18.750 0 $29,756 $20.000-$22."99 $21.250 5 $106.250 2 2 $21.250 0 $33.72" $22,500-$2",650 $23,575 5 $117,875 2 2 $23.575 0 $37."1" Low Income $2",651-$26.999 $25.825 1 $25.825 1 1 $25.825 0 $"0,98" $27,000-$29,"99 $28,250 1 $28,250 1 1 $28.250 0 $....,833 $29.500-$31,999 $30,750 1 $30.750 1 1 $30.750 0 $"8,800 $32,000-$3.....99 $33,250 1 $33,250 1 1 $33.250 0 $52,768 $3".500-$36.999 $35.750 1 $35,750 1 1 $35,750 0 $56,735 --------s37,000-$39.....0 $38.220 1 $38,220 1 1 $38.220 0 $60,655 - Moderate Income $39,....1-$41.999 $"2.210 0 $0 0 0 $"2.210.~~ _ 0 $66,987 $..2.000-$.......99 $"3,250 1 $"3,250 1 0 $"3.250 1 $68.638 $.....500-$46,999 $"5,750 0 $0 0 0 $"5.750 0 $72,605 $"7,000-$"9."99 $"8.250 1 $48,250 1 0 $"8,250 1 $76,573 $"9,500-$51.999 $50.750 0 $0 0 0 $50.750 0 $80.5"0 $52.000-$5.....99 $53,250 1 $53,250 1 0 $53.250 1 $8",508 $5".500-$56.999 $55.750 0' $0 0 0 $55.750 0 $88,"75 $57.000-$59.160 $58,080 0 $0 0 0 $58.080 0 $92.173 Middle IncomelOver $68.280 and over $80.000 ! $80,000 N/A N/A NlA NlA N/A (A) Total employees and wages of this model 250 $3,"78,220 (B) Total wages of 250 employees" iIJI $13,960 $3.490.000 Table 4,11 The Reserve DRI Original Development Program Employ" Wage Distribution Hotel Headship rates for Sl Lucie County Very Low Low 35,7% 56,0% Moderate 69,3% Median Income: 14'.3DD SinglelMulti-worker households Very Low Low 75.9%124,1% 62,6%/37,4% Average Hotel Income: S13,960 .. Moderate 42,4%/57,6% Additional Income 58,7% . Midpoint between S10, 712 (minimum wage of S5,15lhour 'or 40 hourslweek, 52 weeks/year) and S12,499, .. 250-room hotel with 1 workerlroom ... Based 2nd Quarter 2002 ES 202 Data for accommodations, Columns: 1 Income thresholds (based on arn median Income) 2 Wages broken down In increments of $2,500 3 Midpoint of wage ranges 4 Number of employees projected to be in each wage range 5 Total wages of all employees in each wage range 6 Heads of Household by income (taken from employees in Column 4) 7 Single worker households (local pereentage, from the Census) 8 Single worker household income (same as midpoint in Column 3) 9 Multi-worker households (local percentage, from the Census) 10 Multi-worker household income (midpoint in Column 3 multiplied by a pereentage or additional Income, from the Census) Source: Miami Economic Associates. Inc. Tabfe ",6 The Reserve DRI Revised Developm.nt Program Employ.. Wag. Distribution Youth S orts Facll Wa . Distribution 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Number of Heads of Worker Worker Employees Total Wa .s Household HH Incom. HH Incom. Very Low Incom. 12 $139,272 4 3 $11,606 1 $18,419 8 $110,000 3 2 $13,750 1 $21,821 3 $48,750 1 1 $16,250 0 $25,789 2 $37,500 1 1 $18,750 0 $29,756 1 $21,250 1 1 $21,250 0 $33,724 1 $23,575 1 1 $23,575 0 $37,414 Low Income $24,651-$26,999 $25,825 0 $0 0 0 $25,825 0 $40,984 $27,000-$29,499 $28,250 1 $28,250 0 1 $28,250 0 $44,833 $29,500-$31,999 $30,750 0 $0 0 0 $30,750 0 $48,800 $32,000-$34,499 $33,250 0 $0 0 0 $33,250 0 $52,768 $34,500-$36,999 $35,750 1 $35,750 0 1 $35,750 0 $56,735 $37,000-$39,440 $38,220 0 $0 0 0 $38,220 0 $60,655 Mod.rate Incom. $39,441-$41,999 $42,210 0 $0 0 0 $42,210 0 $66,987 $42,000-$44,499 $43,250 0 $0 0 0 $43,250 0 $68,638 $44,500-$46,999 $45,750 0 $0 0 0 $45,750 0 $72,605 $47,000-$49,499 $48,250 0 $0 0 0 $48,250 0 $76,573 $49,500-$51,999 $50,750 1 $50,750 0 0 $50,750 1 $80,540 $52,000-$54,499 $53,250 0 $0 0 0 $53,250 0 $84,508 $54,500-$56,999 $55,750 0 $0 0 0 $55,750 0 $88,475 $57,000-$59,160 $58,080 0 $0 0 0 $58,080 0 $92,173 Middl. Income/Over $68,280 and over $80,000 º $0 N/A NIA N/A N/A N/A 30 $495,097 $494,760 Moderate 69,3% Median Incom.: $49,300 Single/Multi-worker households Average Little Leagu. Complex Income: $16,492 .. Very Low Low Moderate 75,9%124,1% 62,6%/37,4% 42,4%157,6% Additional Income 58,7% . Midpoint between $10,712 (minimum wage of $5,15/hour for 40 hourslweek, 52 weekslyear) and $12,499, .. Anticipated workforce ... Based 2nd Quarter 2002 ES 202 Data for amusements and recreation sector Columns: 1 Income thresholds (based on area median income) 2 Wages broken down In increments of $2,500 3 Midpoint of wage ranges 4 Number of empfoyees projected to be In each wage range 5 Total wages of all employees in each wage range 6 Heads of Household by income (taken from empfoyees In Column 4) 7 Single worker households (local percentage, from the Census) 8 Single worker household Income (same as midpoint In Column 3) 9 Multi-worker households (local percentage, from the Census) 10 Multi-worker household income (midpoint In Column 3 multiplied by a percentage of additional Income, from the Census) Source: Miami Economic Assoclates,lnc, Wage Distribution 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 "''''11'. MUIII- Number of Heads of Worker Worker Wage Ranges Midpoint Employees Total Wages Household HH Income HH Income Very Low Income Less Ihan $12,499 $11,606· 30 $348,180 11 8 $11,606 3 $18,419 $12,500-$14,999 $13,750 20 $275,000 7 5 $13,750 2 $21,821 $15,000-$17,499 $16,250 7 $113,750 2 2 $16,250 0 $25,789 $17,500-$19,999 $18,750 3 $56,250 1 1 $18,750 0 $29,756 $20,000-$22,499 $21,250 2 $42,500 1 1 $21,250 0 $33,724 $22,500-$24,650 $23,575 2 $47,150 1 1 $23,575 0 $37,414 Low Income $24,651-$26,999 $25,825 0 $0 0 0 $25,825 0 $40,984 $27,000-$29,499 $28,250 1 $28,250 1 1 $28,250 0 $44,833 $29,500-$31,999 $30,750 0 $0 0 0 $30,750 0 $48,800 $32,000-$34,499 $33,250 1 $33,250 1 1 $33,250 0 $52,768 $34,500-$36,999 $35,750 0 $0 0 0 $35,750 0 $56,735 $37,000-$39,440 $38,220 1 $38,220 1 1 $38,220 0 $60,655 Moderate Income $39,441-$41,999 $42,210 1 $42,210 0 0 $42,210 1 $66,987 $42,000-$44,499 $43,250 0 $0 0 0 $43,250 0 $68,638 $44,500-$46,999 $45,750 0 $0 0 0 $45,750 0 $72,605 $47,000-$49,499 $48,250 1 $48,250 0 0 $48,250 1 $76,573 $49,500-$51,999 $50,750 0 $0 0 0 $50,750 0 $80,540 $52,000-$54,499 $53,250 0 $0 0 0 $53,250 0 $84,508 $54,500-$56,999 $55,750 0 $0 0 0 $55,750 0 $88,475 $57,000-$59,160 $58,080 0 $0 0 0 $58,080 0 $92,173 Middle Income/Over $68,280 and over $80,000 1 $80,000 N/A NlA N/A N/A N/A (A) Tolal employees and wages oflhis model 70 $1,153,010 (B) Tolal waaes of 70 employees - ß $16,492 $1,154,440 Table 4.7 The Reserve DRI Revised Development Program Employee Wage Distribution Golf Club Headship rates for St. Lucie County Very Low Low 35,7% 56,0% Moderate 69,3% Madlan Income: 149,300 SinglelMulti-worker households Very Low Low 75,9%124,1% 62,6%137,4% Average Golf Club Income: $16,492 .. Moderate 42,4%/57,6% Additional Income 58,7% . Midpoint between $10,712 (minimum wage of 55, 151hour for 40 hourslweek, 52 weeks/year) and 512,499, .. 70 employees based on actual ... Based 2nd Quarter 2002 ES 202 Data for amusements and recreation sector Columns: 1 Income thresholds (based on area median income) 2 Wages broken down In increments of $2,500 3 Midpoint of wage ranges 4 Number of employees projected to be in each wage range 5 T olal wages of all employees in each wage range 6 Heads of Household by income (laken from employees in Column 4) 7 Single worker households (IOCIII percentage, from the Census) 8 Single worker household income (5IIme as midpoint in Colurm 3) 9 Multi-worker households (local percentage, from the Census) 10 Multi-worker household Income (midpoint In Colurm 3 multiplied by a percentage of additional income, from the Census) Source: Miami Economic Associates, Inc, Memorandum To: Review Agencies From: Chris 1. Walsh, P,E. Date: August 13, 2003 Subject: Air Quality Analysis Reserve Notice of Proposed Change The Reserve DR! is located west ofI-95, southeast of Glades Cut-off Road, and immediately north of the POA Village DR! in St. Lucie County, Florida. A Notice of Proposed Change (NOPe) is being submitted for the Reserve DR! to modify the development program as summarized below: Land Development Program Use Approved Proposed Residential 4,100 dus 3,200 dus Industrial 1,600,000 sf 500,000 sf Retail 290,000 sf 290,000 sf Office 100,000 sf 100,000 sf Hotel 250 rms 250 rms Oolf Course o holes 72 holes --~Park o acres 81 acres The purpose of this report is to present the findings of an air screening evaluation for the proposed development for Phase I (2008) and Phase 2 (2013). Potential air quality impacts in the area surrounding the project corridor were assessed for the projects buildout phases in accordance with guidelines contained in Chapter 16 of the FDOT Project Development and Environment (PD&E) Manual. This report presents the results of carbon monoxide (CO) screening analysis of roadway traffic for 2008 and 2013. Scott Morton, Reserve NOPC Air Quality Analysis, August 13, 2003, Page 2 Pollutants of Concern The proposed project has the potential to alter traffic conditions and influence the air quality within the project study area. The polIutants of primary concern with roadway traffic are ozone (03), oxides of nitrogen (NOx), hydrocarbons (He), small particulate matter (PMJO) and carbon monoxide (CO). Ozone, NOx, HC and PMJO are not analyzed at the program level unless specific review of an individual project is requested by appropriate reviewing agencies and concurred with by the Federal Highway Administration (FHW A). Since CO is a localized polIutant that is emitted directly into the atmosphere by vehicles, it is analyzed for individual roadway projects where substantial changes to the traffic conditions are anticipated. The National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for CO is 3S parts per million for one-hour periods and 9 parts per million for eight-hour periods. Carbon Monoxide Screening Analysis The analysis for this project study includes Phase I (2008) and Phase 2(2013) using the FDOT approved COSCREEN98R (version 2.0) screening model. The COSCREEN98R model is a PC based CO screening model which is used to assess the potential for air quality impacts due to roadway traffic. A project alternative that passes the COSCREEN98R model is not expected to result in any violations of the NAAQS for CO and is not likely to have any impact on the air quality of the surrounding area, However, due to the.-\lerY conservative data assumptions built into the screening model, failing the screening analysis does not automatically result in a violation of the NAAQS for CO. Rather, failure of a project Build alternative with the screening analysis dictates that a more detailed air quality analysis must be performed using the MOBILES a and CALINE3 models. Scott Morton, Reserve NOPC Air Quality Analysis, August 13, 2003, Page 3 Traffic generated air quality impacts are primarily a concern near signalized intersections, where during peak periods numerous vehicles are often stopped and idling during the traffic signals' red phase. The COSCREEN98R model incorporates results developed from the MOBILES a and CALINE3 traffic air quality models, which include several worst-case assumptions for traffic characteristics, meteorology and terrain. For this project, the worst-case intersection affected by the development was determined to be Prima Vista Boulevard and U.S. I. User inputs to the screening model include project year(s), land use type, analysis year, the volume and speed of peak hour traffic approaching the intersection on the worst-case link, and distance between receptors and the intersection. Output from the COSCREEN98R model is the CO level, in parts per million, at the selected receptor location(s). The traffic data used for the CO screening analysis has been prepared from data presented in the traffic analysis included in the response to Question 21 for the POA Village DR!. It should be noted that the POA Village traffic analysis evaluated 2008 and 2013 conditions and also accounted for the modified development program for the Reserve. Design Hour Volume (DHV) traffic data for the worst case approach link for the Build alternative is presented in Table 2, The speed used in the COSCREEN98R model was determined to be representative of typical peak hour cruise speeds occurring away from the influences of traffic control devices along the segments assessed. A 40 percent reduction in this speed is built into the COSCREEN98R model and is automatically applied to account for traffic controls such as intersection signalization. The receptor location within the project study is determined based on modeling parameters set by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Air Resources Management. Therein, the receptor was located at a distance of 98 ft from the edge of the outside traffic lane of the cross street and 33 ft from the edge of the adjacent street. Given the local surroundings of the study area, the environment selected for this Scott Morton, Reserve NOPC Air Quality Analysis, August 13, 2003, Page 4 model is an urban land use type, which includes a background CO level of 5.0 parts per million for one-hour predictions and 3.0 parts per million for eight-hour predictions. RESULTS As summarized in the Table below, the One-Hour CO screening analysis for this project indicates that the worst-case CO levels are estimated to be 12.2 parts per million during phases 2008 and 2013. The Eight-Hour CO screening analysis for this project indicates that the worst-case CO levels are estimated to be 7.3 parts per million during phases 2008 and 2013. Output sheets for the 2008 and 2013 analyses are attached. Year 2008 2013 PM Peak-Hour Traffic Volume Worst-Case Link 3,525 3,819 CO Concentration 1-HR 8-HR m m 12,2 7,3 12,2 7.3 CONCLUSIONS The results of the CO screening analysis indicate that the proposed phases are not expected to exceed the NAAQS for CO (35.0 parts per million for One-Hour CO screening and 9.0 parts per million for Eight-Hour CO screening)._ Thus, the project passes the CO screening analysis, and significant air quality impacts due to the proposed project are not expected. T . Appendix A COSCREEN98R Receptor Height 6 06-24-2003 COSCREEN98 (revised August 2000 to remove 11M options) Analyst: JeffPalmq\iist MOBILES Emission Factors Based On: User-supplied Data: Region: Year: Speed: Default Data: Ambient Temperature: Maximum Temperature: Minimum Temperature: Facility Data: Max Approach Traffic Volume: EmTiroImlent: Background Concentration: Receptor Data: PGA Village 2013 Prima Vistal US 1 .. -'3: Central Florida 2013 45 60 70 48 3819 Urban l-hr 8-hr = veh/hour 5.0 ppm 3.0 ppm Receptor Name East-West Distance North-South Distance from Interseetion Receptor Name -------------. 2013 Rec 1 from Intersection ------------- ------------------ -------------------- 98 33 **~******************************************************************** 2013 Rec 1 All distances are in feet RESULTS Max 1-Hr Cone (ppm) Max 8-Hr Cone (ppm) , ---------- ---------- 12.2 7.3 Maximum concentrations include background CO ********~****'***~**~**'***~********~**********************~********.** ' , , Receptor Height 6 06-24-2003 COSCREEN98 (revised August 2000 to remove 11M options) Analyst: Jeff Palmquist MOBILES Emission Factors P dOn: PGA Village 2008 Prima Vista/ US 1 3: Cent ..1. Florida "008 V~i 3525 Urban I-hr 8-hr = veh/hour 5.0 ppm 3.0 ppm Receptor Name East-West Distance North-South Distance Receptor Name ------------- 2008 Rec 1 from Intersection from Intersection ------------- ------------------ -------------------- 98 3~ RESULTS Max I-Hr Conç (ppm) ---------- 12.2 *********************************************************************** USßf-SUpplied Dat' . Region: Year: ;;-' ~"IO.-¡ '?D"C. ""!;.",' .. . ';11"\),., .~, "'¥hI;- "':'::...:..\" -tl""\~'._'1"" -,.-_ ~ '...... ""', Facility l1ax Appr ¡ T~a:..l.~c Volume: Environment.: Background Concentration: Receptor Data: 2008 Rec 1 All distances are in feet . Max 8-Hr Conc (ppm) ---------- 7.3 Maximum concentrations include background CO *****,****************************************************************~ ~ ,'. 06-24-2003 COSCREEN98 (revised August 2000 to remove 11M options) 'Analyst: Jeff Palmquist MOBILES Emissiòn Factors Based On: User-supplied Data: Region: Year: Speed: Default Data: Ambient Temperature: Maximum Temperature: Minimum Temperature: ,Facility Data: Max Approach Traffic Volume: Environment: Background Concentration: Receptor Data: PGA Village 2023 Prima Vistal US 1 3: Central-Florida 2020 45 60 70 48 3350 Urban I-hr 8-hr = veh(hour 5.0 ppm 3.0 ppm Height Receptor Name East-West Distance North-South Distance Receptor from Intersection ------------- from Intersection ------------------ -------------------- 2023 Rec 1 6 All distances are in feet 98 33 *********************************************************************** Receptor Name ------------- 2023 Rec 1 RESULTS Max I-Hr Conc (ppm) Max 8-Hr Conc (ppm) ---------- ---------- 11. 8 7.1 Maximum concentrations include background CO ~ ~ u z o Þ-I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z o Þ-I ~ :s > ~ ~ ~ :s ~ z, -< ~ fLl ~ fLl .~ q..s:¡¡¡¡¡ ==~ rg~~ O¡¡¡¡¡= !;:~u ~~~ Øocu j Øoc T ~ ~ j ~ = ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o ~ ~ < u, ¡¡¡¡¡ I ~ ¡;;¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ < < < < < < zzzzz i o < 0 < < < z i i i o < ~ z 0 en G) t) CIS ~ ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ § -'ª ~ t) ~ o ''¡:: I ::t:= tä- ~ "0 G) - en 00 '> ~ G) G) r.I) enU ,- :l., ~o ë;Z ~~ Š~ CIS G) ~.~ G) e G),Q r.I) =' en ~~ ~ ô ~ = en '§ ~ "0 fä òO ...c:: = t) :.a . ..2 - ='t) t) ~ ë) <0 :.c:>; o .S rñ .~ ~ ... t) G)5 ë; ~ .2 ~5 5 ~ ~ < ~ ~ en C. 1; < < < < < < < < < - o ... CIS t) .... ~ d ...... = o ~ ~ ~ Q ~ ~ ,.-. =. ...c:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :2 ~ ~ ~ .;;; = ê ~ ~ ~ .~ < -Z' G) ~ Q !a en ~ ~ : fä rn ¡g...c:: 8 -~.ti~ ~ -::: CIS ~ CIS § .. ~.- ,Š en oCt; ~ ~ ~ § .2 CIS Ö ~ Q ~ ~ < ~ ô ~ .S r: "0 gp .- ] . ~ -.a 'C t) Q ... .S rñ Q ........ -0 ~5 :.a f 5 ~ ~ ~ ë; 1:: Q~ 5 8.~ ~ .:= 0 ~ < p::: ~ < z "0 v t+=: :.e o e "0 v tf o 0. e 0. v -5 !+-; o tIJ V .... 0. o u ] 4) 00 !ä ..c:: u "'tj...: 4) ¡:: tIJ V o 00 goCl1 .... tIJ o.;.a ..c:: .... ~ 0 4) .... !+-; v o go ¡::- o v .- > Q...g .- .... v ~ -5 I ..ge-;' "'tj 0 4)c.l;: ] ã 4).- "'tj«i ~ ê ucg n.= CI1_ ~ CI1 4) ¡:: g.9 4) .-::: -a"'tj ~] v..... = ~ o 50 !ä 4) -5~ ~ Š E ª ~ ~ -S¡::Q tf 4) .;; ~ ~ . 8.~ ~ .~ ~~ - .. !ä ~"'S. O,S Z 'r;; < z < z ~ u z o ~ E-t -< ~ ~ ~ E-t ~ ~ z o ~ E-t ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ E-t ~ E-t V1 ~ V1 §~J~ ..... :E ~ =~iCl ~....~....~ Q) ¡.¡.¡ < < < < < < < < < < < < "'C :; < < c:: 0 O.~ i i i i i i i i i i 0 i i ..c i i $:. .~....Ç.) z u ., =~/~ ~ 0 ØotÇ.) 0 tr.J j 0 ~ ~ 0 I < < < < < < < < < < < 0 <:> < < N O~ <:> i i i i i .-Z _i i i i ""= i <:> i i 0 Nn - ~ 0\ - ~ ~ ØoI cj 0 ~ < < < < < < < < < ~ < 0 < < ~ < N 0 V) i i i i i i i i i i - i o~ N i i \0 0 \Ò 0 ØoI \0 In ~ ØoI ~~ ¡i "'C !ä ~ ~ ~ rn Q) Gi' - 0 íf ~ ~ -= 5 ~ Co:) c£ c:: r.E ~ .~ .- ..0 0 rn e ~ '-" CIJ ~ CIJ ~ ~ "'C rn CIJ "'C ~ c:: §- !ä bO .ë- c:: bO §- 0 !ä u 0 J:: 0 Ë .~ ..c c:: .~ .S ..c rn rn :a 0 rn 1/1 ~ CIJ ~ CIJ U CIJ "'C ~ 1/1 U Co:) c:: =: u .__,CIJ ~ :2 cj Õ c:: =: :2 ~ U 1/1 ~ ";j .S! 0 g ,~ 1-- ..... .- 0 0 õ ~ .~ CIJ ~ CIJ c:: U ~ ..c .- CIJ 0 c:: ..... c:: ~ 0 .t:: .S :a 0 CIJ 0 0 ~ CIJ 0 0 ª ~ '-" .~ .- ~ > "'C ª .~ '-" » ";j .~ c:: .Ëf ~ c:: ";j c:: o~ .~ 0 ,......, 0 e .- (.) ~o 0 0 ~ Š ë.. (.) CIJ (.) t) CIJ ~ ..S! e t) ... ~ .- ..S! "'C ;:g ~ 8 ;:g 8 "'C Ó < 0 0 ó < e 0 ~ 8 c:: ~ '3 .B ... 0 >< ~ '3 0 :2 .B 0 a:I ø.. (.) ~ d (.) ~ :l., ~ ..c 8- a:I tñ < ~ ~ < ¡:Q u .- =It: =It 0 =It: =It: CI) ~ þ ~ ~ róIiI CIJ ";j ~ '3 .- .ª t¡ U2 :2 0 "'C :I: ..s '" o l+:: :a o S '" o tIJ o p., o ... p., o oS 4-4 o tIJ o 's. o (,,) '" &1 o Ol) &1 .--,.c (,,) -0 . o~ tIJ 0 o Ol) p.,tI:1 8 tIJ p.,:E .:= ... ~ 0 o t 4-4p. o 0 s;:- o 0 .;:: ~ p.,,,, 'C 0 ~ oS I °SN '" I -0 .8 0- ] s o .... -o'S ~ Ë ~~ ¡::.... tI:1~ ta o s;: g .g o .-<;::: ~'" ~~ ~~ o = ã [ .s~ e S o e ª o 0 ..c ~ ,Se:Q tIJ 0 .;; ~ tIJ s;: . o ~ p.,-- ~.~ tI:1 tI:1 4-44:; - .. &1 ~- f-4p., O~ Z .~ ~ ~~ -< == u z o ~ ~ -< z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z o ~ ~ -< ~ > ~ ~ ~ ;:$ ~ ~ rLJ. ,- ---= ;:J rLJ. .~ ~~~ æ~~ o~= 5"i!ijU ~=~ ~u ri5l æ ~ ~ ri5l ,~ < :i j ~ g ~ o -s '~ "C M 'š .c ;:s ~U ,- ~ ~o -z ~ C,,) ~ ~ o o tI) j ~ ~ ri5l r'-1 o ~ ~ enU .- ~ ~o -¡;z =-s <:.... š~ eM r-< .- o 8 o.c tI) ;:s en ~ o t.:) ri5l ~ U ri5l t.:) ~ en C. 'E o () .- ..= o > -¡; e o >< ~ "It: " < < :i :i < < :i :i < < :i :i en = o en .~ .§ 5 .... r/) :a ~ 15 e- C,,) o <: o ~ < < < :i :i :i < < < < < :i :i :i :i :i < < < :i :i :i < < < < < :i :i_:i :i :i < < < :i :i :i < < ~ < < :i :i z :i :i b.O = :a ;:s . _ C,,) C,,)õ ~ .5:f tIS ~ = "C -0 ;:::,¡ ~ 8 en en g¡ ~ 0 ~ .ë - ~ ~ ã tI -¡; -0 ..= 0 ~ g~ ~ ] -å .- 0 = ~ -s 8 p::: 0 .~ ~; .~ ] ~ tIS,g 0 o 5 >< 1; ~'tIS ~ ~ ~ ti5 -å ti5 "It: ¡ ð "C o = 'š ~ tIS o ~ < en = o '~ ~ o .~ .5 ::E ~ ~ r/) = o --.~ .... :a = o C,,) ~ = 1~ ¡g "C ,9 01) .... .5 ;9= -g . ... C,,) ~ () Õ "' = ~ ; .- 2J "'" ~ = ~ ~o tIS 8 ~ 0 < ~ o < d ~ o C,,) IE o < < < < < :i :i :i :i :i o g < < < g :i :i :i ..... -s .~ "C o t: 'š .c ;:s ~U ,- ~ ~o -¡;z ~ C,,) ~ ~ o o tI) enU .- ~ ~o ~ ~ ~ ]z !ä < !ä !ä <:€ ~ :i ~ ~ ~~ z z z ~.~ o 8 o.c tI) ;:s en -.:: o ~ o ! en en ~ gf :a - '3 a:I en <1.1 ~ C. ã .~ ~ -5 () C,,) -:E ~ <1.1 tIS 0 ~ ~ .§ ~ .5 .g ~ e ~ ~ ,g 0 co 8 >< ~ ~ ~ ~ "It: "It: ti5 "It: "C o t+:: :a o e "C o r/) o c. ~ o ;S ~ o r/) o 's. o (,) ] ~ j (,) '"t:I . oi:: r/) 0 o bI) c.Co;: e r/) c.:E ..c:: '"' ~ 0 o '"' ~8. o 0 =- o 0 .- > Q.-8 'I: C,,) 0 r/);S I OeM '"t:I I 1Lß ] § 0'- '"t:I~ ~ ê C,,)~ ~.- ":ta o = C,,) 0 = ',= 0._ i::'"t:I ~] - ~ rn o ~ ~[ ~ ~ e o e ª ] ~ ,g:Q r/) 0 .;; f5 r/) = . o r/) c.bI) ê'~ ~~ - .. fä ~p. O~ Z '{;; ~ < == u z o ~ ~ < ~ ~ r-1 ~ r-1 ~ Z o ~ ~ r-1 ~ ~ < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ = ~ ~ " ô~ Ä~.~ æ~~ O~= >~.u ~.....~....~ u < ~ < i z :i j ~ ~ ~ ~ < ~,__ _ z z :i ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ r-; ~. , o ~ ~ ~ æ;; o ~ H ð ~ ~ ~ r-l ~ ~ ~ E < < < i i :i ... ~ ã VI - ~ ~ VI ¿ = o 'Ë 5 VI ~ ~ ~ þ 'õ t'd fã- o ~'ÚÌ bÐ-c o ~ ~ § o < ~ g VI = 1,2 ,'I:: -c = o o ~ bÐ B rn - t'd o ï3 ~ .r:: ~ =' ~ ¡ p., < < < :i i :i ~ < < < < < < < < z :i i :i :i :i :i :i :i < < < i :i i -e- ~ < < < < < < < < z :i i :i :i :i :i :i i < < < i :i :i ~ < < < < < < < < z i i :i :i :i :i :i i ,-.. õ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :ë m .~ = o ..... ~ o ~ a bÐ .5 -c =' . _ 0 o õ .5 ur = ~ VI ~ e ,~ ~ ~~ +J ~ ~ Y. ã ~ ~ ~ 0 "" 01. ..r:: ... ~ Õ VI 'Ë e e o ~~ :E =0 = ~ s ~ 0 ~ .... ~ õ ~ o ~ > :ë ~ :> ~' '';:: ~-;; = ª~-C ] .q ~ 5 8 ~ ~~ ~ ~ =-0-.5 ~ 0 0 ..... t'de~ CQCQ ¡;) ~-c ~ ~ ~ o 00( Q ~ ¡ '5 ~ ~ ø.. ,-.. vi ,-.. -c .!d VI ~ ~ ~ =' \l7l-ã :: 0lJ .r:: _ t'd 0 - ... - t+= 0 t'd -c ~ § ã § .~ -~ ~ g ] ¡ -; Q ~ i:ñ < < :i i < < :i i < < :i i ~ t'd .5 .s bÐ = VI :.a . ¡.:: =,.s ,= Õ ~~ t: .5 ¥J ~ = ._ VI ~~ ~ .r:: § bÐ e ~ .- t'd ~ > ..... ~ ~ -;; :.a o ~ E § t'd ~ ~ 0 t:~ ~ 0 ~~ ~ 0 "t:I IU !+:: :.a o 8 "t:I IU VI o 0. 8 Po IU ;5 ~ o VI IU .- Po o u ] (I) Ol) ] u "t:I . (1)1:: VI (I) o öl) Po CIS 8 en Po:.a .c: ... ~ 0 ~ ... ~ (I) o g. =- o (I) .¡:: ~ Po "'0 .¡:: U (I) VI;9 I ~8'1 "'0 0 .,2c.t= .... = .a 0 (I).... "'O~ ~ ã ucg ~.= CIS_ ~ CIS o = g .8 ~ .1:: ="'0 ~-g 0- = ~ o g. J ~ ~ ~ 8 8 ª .8 ~ -Sc.Q en (I) .~ ~ VI = . o en PoOl) ~.~ ~.s - ~] E-oPo o~ Z 'r;j ~ u z o Þ-I ~ < ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Z o Þ-I ~ ~ ~ Q ~ :s ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cL~ Ä-<~ rJ:).=~ p~ o~ ¡¡: is'. .U,.. ' ~=f:) ~o j ~ ~......" ~ t.Þ ~ ~ = ~ o ~ ~ ~ ~ o t.Þ ;;¡;i ~ -< t:.) ;;¡;i i ~ p ~ ~ ~ < < i i .( < i i '. Q) bO < ] i u o z II} = o ''¡:: ~ Q) II} Q) P.. ~ Q) bO tU ~ ~ ..( .;¿ "C II} tã 5 ëa of 100 Q) ~ê' =,:;= = = 0 tU = '-" Q) CJ «I "C _ Q.Q)II} II} ..... Q) .a CJ C:Q)~ Q) bI) 3 8"~1I} < .( .( .( .( i i i i i -~ .( z i .( .( 0 i i ~ ~ ~ ;; ;; ..c:: ..c:: U U o 0 Z Z ~ < .( ] i i u o z en ~ Q) ¡g -~ ~ II} 'ß ¡g = ,S! 5 o ~ .... ~ - :::"o:.s!:: '~ = ~ CJ 1+-0 0 ¡u o 0 CJ - -; ,~ ti5 ~ Q) bO tU o ..( ~ Q ~ .( 3 5 ~ ..g ~Ë: 100 Q) o II} 100 ~ ~Q. ..0::1 ~ Q) =~ ta ,9 = ~,9 Ë:~.-; ~.B= ~ 0 0 ø.. a. ~ .«.(.(.(~<.( < iiiiizii i .( < .( .( i i i i .è 'ë tU ~ .- ..... o ~ o ...... .b_~ ..,¡ 'ë tU ~ Q) "ª = ti5 < < i i ::r: ¡;. ~ ~ .( < .( < g ] < ] i i i i ~ u i '~ Z ~ Q) Q) CI) "C ~ ~ II} ~ II} !!?, - II} .... ~.B = '8 tã '¡;j 0 ~::I ..c:: ", '~ 'A CJ .... en ... w. ,_5 _ 0 = = ,::¡ tU ..... .0_ Q) ... _ = = ..... II} ::I Q) 0Q);';::Q)~~ '~ § = !:: ,5 ~ CJ Õ 0 ë......1+-o ~ .E4) CJ j 8~ .B ij 0 .> ~ ¡-;¡ 0 :;: ~ :;: o ..( Q ~ 3 ..... 5 "C '¡;j ~ ~~ ~ ~ tU = '§ tI) "C ~ bI) ;; = ..c:: :.s , CJ .E£ CJ Q) .5 vi ~= ~Q) tU e ~ Q) ....Q) CJ en ..( ~ i:i5 -~ ¡c.... ::r: ~ ~ "C Q) tI) '> Q) ~ Q) Q) CI) ---....... tIS = o '~ o o - ~ Q) t+:: :.a o e ~ Q) tI) o Po o 100 Po GJ -S 1+-0 o tI) GJ '.... Po o o ~ ~ GJ OJ) ~ .d o ~...; GJ c:: tI) GJ o OJ) Po tIS 8 tI) Po:a .d J." ~ 0 Q) J." !.¡..¡ GJ o g. c::- o GJ ';:3 t Po~ .¡:: GJ ~ -S I Q)etr\ ~ I 1Lg ] § Q)'- ~~ ~ ê o~ ~,- ~- ~ tIS Q) c:: g,9 GJ .-::: =~ GJ--g tI) ~ ¡j o ::s ~ g- -S~ Q) tIS 15 e e ª Q) Q) ,.Q !:i 8I:Q tI) Q) '~ ¢:: !/} § tl)0J)' Po ~.~ ~.ð - .. ~ ~- f-4Po O.B Z '¡¡; ~ < == u z o ~ ~ < z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z o ~ ~ ~ > ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z < ~ ø ~ ø ô~ =-<,.~ "'~~ þ~ < « « < < < ~ < < < Orólõ1 i Z Z Z Z Z z Z i Z .~....~....~ ~.., .~ ~u -s -s .~ .~ ~ ~ Q) M j ~ ï§ ·ë ..c ..c Øot ;::s ;::s tJ 0 tJ g tJ u < < 0 « < -< tJ u < < .- ~ 0 ,- ~ I,' ~o Z Z ô Z Z Z ~ Z Z -z 0- ¡;z ~ ~ N ~ ~ C) C) ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) Q) Q) Q) tI) tI) j tJ U .- ~ ~O ~ ¡;z =-- ~:€ ~ < « Iä « < <; < < róIõ1 ..c:: C) ~ Vl Z Z u Z Z z ~ ~ Z Z 0 <õ-i 0 e M ~ z E-< ·ë Q) Q) ..c =-- tI) ;::s tJ ~~ ~ ~ ,....., - Q)~ Q) 0 ~ ~ ~ s:: e róIõ1 tJ ~ CI:I tJ tJ E Q. ~ ~ Q. ·B ·B tJ bO tJ Iä s:: Q) tJ Q) 0 t) s:: tJ tJ ..c:: -L .~ rõIiI tJ :a ~ Q) --C) tJ ~ :E 'S:: ;::s ci C) ¡; ..c:: .§ ë1 Q) .9 - Õ '-" ! tJ Q) Q) ~ > C) Q) s:: > en .'t: ,S :f Q) - tJ ~ 0 :a e ¡; ~ C) ~ .~ ¡; E s:: Q)~ ~ ~ 0 E s:: g 0 0 ~ C) ~e tJ ~ "9 ..S2 Q) C) ... ... æ e >< < 0 e Q) 0 ß 0 ¡,¡J C) tJ 0 ø.. ¡,¡J ¡,¡; ~ ~ 0 -< ~ fi: ~ ~ ¡;¡ :::t ~ ~ 8 ;::J ·E ~> Q) tI) ~ - ·š ~ ~ a$ róIõ1 - CI:I ~ en Q) Õ ~ 13 t+:: ] e ~ cu rn & e ~ .s e¡.., o rn U .~ ] ~ ~ "B~ rn u 8.~ e rn ~:.a 1~ e¡..,8,. o 0 c=- o u ':;3 &> .ê'~ to) u rn -5 I Ue\O ~ I "Bcß - ·s 8 u·~ ]§ Ði ~] ~ 0 ....:;3 B'- ~:g s:i o 6- ~ ~ ~ ã e e ¡ .8 ~ g~ .~~ is . ~~ ~.~ ~.š .. i ~ø. OB Z .;; August, 2003 RESERVE a.k.a. PGA VilLAGE DRI Comprehensive Plan Amendment Table of Contents 1. Application and Checklist 2. land Use Amendment Justification 3. Maps " 1. General location Map 2. Existing Zoning Map 3. Existing land Use Map 4. Proposed land Use Map 5. Vegetation Map F 6. Conceptual Master Plan Map H 7. FEMA Map '" 4. legal Description and Warranty Deeds 5. Traffic Analysis ',. " 1 "', APPLICATION FOR COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT ~y OF PORT ST. LUCIE _ ~.cming & Zoning Department 121 SW Port St. Lucie Boulevard Port St. Lucie, Florida 34984 TEL (561) 871-5212 FAX (561) 871-5124 FOR OFFICE USE ONLY Planning Dept Fee (Nonrefundable) $ Receipt # Application fee: $1,910, plus $15 for each acre or portion thereof. Make checks payable to the 'City of Port St. Lucie.' All items on this application should be addressed, otherwise it cannot be processed. Attach proof of ownership; two copies of deed or contract for purchase. Please type or print clearly in BLACK ink. PROPERTY OWNER Name: Reserve Homes Ltd.. L.P. Address: 1601 Forum Place. Suite 805 West Palm Beach. FL 3340 I Telephone No.: 561-682-9500 Fax No,: 561-682-1050 IF PROPERTY IS IN MULTIPLE OR CORPORATE OWNERSHIP, PLEASE PROVIDE ONE CONTACT PERSON , '" Name: John CsaDo Address: 1601 Forum Place. Suite 805 West Palm Beach. FL 33401 Telephone No.: 561-682-9500 Fax No,: 561-682-1050 'ENT OR OWNER (if any) Name: Greg B02l!S. Thomas Lucido and Associates Address: 100 Avenue A. Suite 2A Fort Pierce. FL 34950 Telephone No.: 772-467-1301 Fax No.: 772-467-1303 PROPERTY INFORMATION Boundary Description See attached legal description. (attach map) Property Tax J.D. Number Current Land Use GCII/LI/HI Current Zoning IN Proposed Land Use RUOSR" Acreage of Property 154.4 Reason for Comprehensive Plan Amendment: See attachment B ~ /; I u 3 Date Signature fOwner *Tf signature is not that of owner, a letter of authorization from the owner is needed. ¡: Signature on this application acknowledges that a certificate of concurrency for adequate public facilities as needed to service this project hI:&¡, not yet been detennined, Adequacy of public facility services is not guaranteed at this stage in the development review process, Adequacy for public facilities is detennined through certification of concurrency and the issuance of final local development orders as may be necessary for this project to be determined based on the application material submitted, C:\DOCUME-t\smortOn\LOCALS-I\Temp\comp plan amendment app,DOC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CHECKLIST ....he following materials are required for a complete analysis of the application, Much of this material will be ,warded to the Planning and Zoning Board, City Council, and Department of Community Affairs, Please provide material that can be copied in black and white on standard sized paper, Please note that the information must address St. Lucie County if appropriate and must consider maximum utilization of the property unless an appropriate condition is agreed to as part of the application. 1, , Completed application and fee 2. Completed rezoning application and fee (optional) 3. Written description of area subject to application 4. Copy ofdeed(s) 5, Justification for land use amendment 6. List and map of adjacent future land use map classifications located to the north, south, east, and west '... 7, List of adjacent existing land uses located 0 the north, south, east, and west (i.e,: house, vacant, store, church, etc,) 8. List of adjacent existing zoning categories located to the north, south, east, and west 9. Map and area of site included in FEMA flood plain and 100 and 500 year flood categories with map panel number 10. Map and description of the location, type, and area of wetlands located on site 11. Map and description of the location, type and area of existing vegetation using Florida Land Use and Cover Classification System (FLUCAS) categories -", 12. Traffic analysis 13. Market study (for commercial categories only) 14. Capacity analysis, location, and..seI:vice description for the following public services: sanitary sewer, public water, solid waste, drainage, recreation, fire and emergency services, police,- education 15, Location map with major streets clearly identified 16. Existing future land use map 17. Proposed future land use map 18, Chart comparing the areas of existing and proposed future land uses. /1 ¡) Il "J/ Ø/ ¡f t¡fi/ .. ( . WI¡ \~p , cant's signaire Date L:\worbtatiOl\l\Projects\BS71\NOPC\wdoc\LUPA\comp plan amendment app,DOC COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FUTURE LAND USE MAP AMENDMENT Supplemental Information 1. Land Use Plan. A land use map shall be submitted which designates the proposed future land use ad existing future land use designations for the area requested, and for the area surrounding the property. The land use plan shall include a map, together with other appropriate media addressing the following: a. Residential Development Characteristics. The land use map shall indicate the magnitude and distribution of existing and proposed residential acres. ----0:- Non-Residential Activities. The land use map plan shall indicate the general type, location, magnitude, intensity, and distribution of non-residentlalactivities including the maximum proposed square footage of commercial, office, and industrial uses. This information shall be prepared and based on the existing Future Land Use classification and proposed Future Land Use classification. The proposed number of acres allocated to private institutional uses such as places of worship as well as civic, cultural, or educational facilittes shall be included. 2. Natural Features of the Environment. Significant natural features of the proposed development shall be mapped and described in the Land Use Plan Map or narrative. Potential methods of managing any major environmental impacts which are likely to be generated by the proposed development shall be identified. Natural features shall include, but not be limited to: -0 I\. a. vegetation b. soils c. wetlands d. shorelines e. estuarine and/or riverine systems f. other significant resources A more detailed environmental assessment shall be required if environmentally sensitive areas are identified 3. -Public Improvements. The general location and extent of existing and planned public improvements shall De incorporated in the land use plan map or narrative as -applicable. Public improvements shall include, but not be limited to, traffic circulation; water and wastewater services; surface water management; parks, recreation facilities, and major open spaces; protective services, including fire, police, and emergency services; electrical utilities, including substations; schools; and other public facilities. The following information on the status and availability of public facilities shall be provided: a. Traffic i) ii) A location map showing arterial and collector roads within a one mile radius of site. Average Daily Trips (ADT) and Generation rates for existing land use, development based on the existing Future Land Use, and proposed Future Land Use. C:\DOCUME-I \smorton\LOCALS-I\Temp\comp plan amendment app,DQC iii) A traffic analysis may be required pursuant to Section 55-4(A) of the Port St. Lucie Comprehensive Plan if the ADT's exceed 10% or 1,000 trips, whichever is greater. b. Utilities - Water and Sewer i) Is location presently served by central water and/or sewer? ii) Is location planned for water and/or sewer service? iii) Nearest water/sewer main location iv) Available, or planned plan capacity c. Emergency Services - Policy, Fire, EMS i) Nearest existing fire station ii) Nearest planned fire station iii) Existing fire insurance rating/response time d. SchoolslRecreation "', i) Existing parks and schools within five miles ii) Planned park and school sites within five miles iii) Port St. Lucie Park Dedication requirements calculated per Section 4.4(D) of the Port St. Lucie Comprehensive Plan. iv) Projected population and school' age population, calculated for existing Future Land Use and proposed Future Land Use. e. Market Study - Commercial Only Does market study indicate a current need for commercial development within next five years or within next ten years? C:\DOCUME-I \smorton\LOCALS-1 \Tcmp\comp plan amendment app,DQC ~ August, 2003 RESERVE a.k.a. PGA VILLAGE DRI '. Comprehensive Plan Amendment Checklist ResDonses 1. Completed application and fee: See Application, copy of check for fees and Supplemental Information in this section. 2. Completed rezoning application and fee (optional): Not included at this time. 3. Written description of area subject to application: The project area is located in the Go-Team Industrial Park, in the North end of the Reserve DR!. The area currently has a land use designation of Industrial, Li9!1t Industrial, General Commercial and Institutional. 4. Copy of deeds: ',- See Section 4. 5. Justification for Land Use Amendment: The purpose of this land use plan amendment is help the City meet its recreation and open space needs by redesignating approximately 102 acres of land from CG/LI and I to OSR and to meet the housing needs of current and future residents by redesignating 73 acres from CG and I to RL 6. List and map of adjacent future land use m~p classifications located to the north, south, east and west. Please refer to Existing Land Use Map in Section 3. 7. List of adjacent existing land uses located to the north, south, east and west (i.e.: house, vacant, store, church, etc) The adjacent land uses are as follows: North: Vacant South: Residential/Golf Course '. East: Residential West: Citrus Grove/Agricultural 1 August, 2003 RESERVE a.k.a. PGA VilLAGE DRI Comprehensive Plan Amendment Chec~istResDonses 8. list of adjacent existing zoning categories located to the north, south, east, and west: The adjacent zoning categories are as follows: North: AG-2.5 (SLC) South: PUD (SLC) East;-RS-2, GU (PSL) West: AG-2.5 (SLC) "'\. 9. Map and area of site included in FEMA flood plain and 100 and 500 year flood categories with map panel number: Please see FEMA Map in Section 3,(coming from Mike K. 'Lawson-Noble) 10. Map and description of the location, type, and area of wetlands located on site: There are two existing wetlands on the site, which are part of a Wetland Buffer/Mitigation Plan that has been permitted with the Army Corps of Engineers, Permit No. 199400820(IP-DEB). The area of the upland preserve has been delineated and is shown on the Vegetation Map. No impacts are proposed to this mitigation area. "t" 11. Map and description of the location, type and area of existing vegetation using Florida land Use and Cover Classification System (FlUCAS) categories: Please see Vegetation Map in Section 3. 12. Traffic analysis: Please see Traffic Study in Section 5. 13. Market study (for commercial categories only): N/A :¡i; , 2 "1, August, 2003 RESERVE a.k.a. PGA VILLAGE DRI Comprehensive Plan Amendment Checklist ResDonses 14. Capacity analysis, location, and service description for the following public services: sanitary sewer, public water, solid waste, drainage, recreation, fire and emergency services, police, education: \. Wastewater Management: The area is currently being serviced by the Reserve COD and will be serviced by the COD in the future. Stormwater Management: Stormwater Management is provided thfetigh the Reserve Master Stormwater Perm'its for the Go-Team Industrial Park. .m'" Parks, Recreation and major open spaces: Currently, there are 8 parks sites within 5 miles of the project. The parks are: 1. Recreation Center 2. Sportsman's Park 3. Swan Park 4. Jaycee Park 5. Girlscout Park 6. Turtle Run Park 7. Gulfstream Park 8. McChesney Park One more park, Oak Hammock Park is designated as a future park site. '~ The recreational need of the residential component is being met through the recreational facilities of the Reserve DR!. Even th~ugh this application is requesting an increase in Residential land use, the overall number of units within the Reserve are being reduced by 900 through a NOPC application that is being filed concurrent with this application. The Reserve has met all Development Conditions with regards to recreational facilities that were placed with the additional units in mind. Fire, Police, and emergency services: Even though this application is requesting an increase in Residential land use, the overall number of units within the Reserve are being reduced by 900 through a NOPC application that is being filed concurrent with this application. Emergency Services have been designed to meet the needs of the original allowable amount of units. " 3 ~ RESERVE a.k.a. PGA VILLAGE DRI Comprehensive Plan Amendment Checklist ResDonses August, 2003 ',. "1,\ Education: Currently there are 7 schools within 5 miles of the project. The schools are: 1. Parkway Elementary 2. Bayshore Elementary 3. Manatee Elementary 4. Port St. Lucie Elementary 5. Centennial Middle School 6. Centennial High Schoo.l.- 7. Northport High School 15. Location map with major street clearly identified: '.. Please see attached General Location Map in Section 3 16. Existing future land use map: Please see Existing Land Use Map in Section 3. 17. Proposed future land use map: Please see Proposed Land Use Map in Section 3. 18. Chart comparing the areas of existing and proposed future land use areas: Existing Land Use Acreage Total Project Area Desianation HI 58.08 LI 33.34 228.98 CG 86.31 I 51.17 Proposed Land Use Acreage Total Project Area Designation RL 54.30 228.98. OSR 101.77 HI 58.08 LI 8.04 RIW 6.79 "\,. 4 -- ~- . RESERVE a.k.a. PGA VILLAGE DRI Comprehensive Plan Amendment August, 2003 "',- LEGAL DESCRIPTION: BEING THREE (3) PARCELS OF LAND LYING IN SECTION 15, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND BEING MORE PARTICYLARL Y DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 1: BEING ALL OF LOTS 1 AND 2 BLOCK D AND ALL OF LOTS 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17,18,19,20,21,22,24 AND 24, BLOCK B, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF G.O. TEAM INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT THREE, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 26, PAGES 2 AN 2A, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID ST. LUCIE COUNTY; TOGETHER WITH: ',. PARCEL 2: BEING BOUNDED SOUTHERLY BY THE NORTHEASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF COMMERCE CENTRE DRIVE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF COMMERCE CENTRE DRIVE - PHASE 11, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 39, PAGES 20 AND 20A, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID ST. LUCIE COUNTY, BY THE EASTERLY AND NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID G.O. TEAM INDUSTRIAL PARK UNIT THREE AND BY THE NORTHEASTERLY LINE OF LOT 4, BLOCK 'C' AS SHOWN OM THE PLAT OF G.O. TEAM INDUSTRIAL PARK- UNIT ONE, RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 23, PAGES 31 AND 31A, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID ST. LUCIE COUNTY; BqUNDED ON THE EAST BY THE EAST LINE OF SAID SECTION 15 SAID EAST LINE ALSO BEING THE WEST LINE OF THE PLAT OF PORT ST. LUCIE SECTION FORTY FOUR, "', RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 16, PAGES 23, 23A THRU 23U, PUBLIC ' RECORDS OF SAID ST. LUCIE COUNTY; BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY ; THE SOUTH LINE OF THE NORTH ONE-HALF OF THE NORTH ONE- QUARTER OF SAID SECTION 15; AND BOUNDED ON THE NORTHWEST BY THE SOUTHEASTERLY LINE OF THE FLORIDA POWER AND LIGHT COMPANY EASEMENT RECORDED IN OFFICIAL RECORDS BOOK 218, PAGE 2274, PUBLIC RECORDS OF SAID ST. LUCIE COUNTY; "\.. 1 .- .. August, 2003 RESERVE a.k.a. PGA VILLAGE DRI Comprehensive Plan Amendment TOGETHER WITH: PARCEL 3: BEING BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION 15; BOUNDED ON THE EAST, NORTHEAST AND NORTH BY THE WESTERLY, SOUTHWESTERLY AN SOUTHERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID COMMERCE CENTRE DRIVE; AND BOUNDED ON THE WEST BY THE EAST LINE OF SAID G.O. TEAM INDUSTRIAL PARK UNII.TI:IREE. CONTAINING 154.4 ACRES, MORE OR LESS, NOTE: INFORMATION USED IN PREPARING THIS DESCRIPTION WAS OBTAINED FROM THE PLATS OF RECORD, , TAX MAPS AND RECORDS OF LAWSON, NOBLE & \/VEBB, INC, AN ACCURATE METES AND BOUNDS DESCRIPTION CAN NOT BE PREPARED FOR THIS PROPERTY WITHOUT SURVEY FIELD WORK TH ERE WAS NO FIELD WORK DON E IN CONNECTION WITH THiS DESCRIPTION. -" "', "\, 2 88/18/2003 08: 45 ~ ~ ii 5675861515 KOLTER PAGE 02/05 PJtEPARED BY AND llE1UlUf TO: H. William Pert')', Esquire Gunster, Yoakley, Va1des~Fauli It Stew.rt, P.A. 777 Soutn Flaaler Drive, Suite SOO But West Palm Beach. FJorida 33.-01 Orantce's TIN: Parcel Tu IDNo.: WÄRRANTY DEED THIS WARRANTY DEED;s made tbis ~ day of April. 1998, by CALLAWAY LAND &. CA TT'LE CO. LIMITED PARTNSRSHIP ("Calla~y LP"), a Florida limited ~ip md CALLA WAY LAND & CATTLE COMPANY, INC. (tI~"), a Florida, çorporation (Callaway LP and CLC are collectively "Grmtpr"),whose mailin, address is 2160 Reaerve Park Trace, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34986, to RESERVB HOMES LID., L.P.. a Delaware limited partnership. (p.r.ntee"). whose JI18Uing address is c/o 3600 Club Place, Boca Raton, Florida 33496. ' '.. WITNESS E TB: That Grantor, for and in cansideration of the sum ofTEN OOLLAP.S ($10.00) and otber lcod and valuable consideration, the receipt of which is hereby aclcnowledled, hereby grants, barpiu ad sells to Grantee fee simple tide to aU of that certain real property, situate in SL Lucie County, Florida, which is more particularly described as follows: SEE EXØ1BlI "A" A TrACBED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF. TOGJ;[.liJ!at WITH all haeditaments, appurtenances and improvements on tbI: real property and all right, title Uld interest afGnntor, if _y, in and to lnyaDd alJ riparian and littorB1 riptl, any ñl1câ and bulkheaded lend, accretions and all Sb'eetS, roads. highways, euements., accesses and rip.-of-way appun.enaot thereto. and .11 rl¡ht, ti1:1e and interest of Grantor in 8I1d to auy and an covenanti, restrictions and a¡reements benefiting the reeJ property (collectively, the "Premises"). TO B.A VE AND TO BOLD tbe same in fee simple forever, subject to aU restricdoas, RSerV&ÛOhS, covenants and easements of record and tøe& and assessments for 1he yar 1998 and years sublec(ueDtthereto. GRANTOR docs hereby OOVeDut with Grantee that at the time of dtUvery of ' this Deed the Premises was free fi'om all eøcumbtaaces lMde by Grantor, and that Grantor will WIUI'IDt and defend the same a¡unst the lawful claims of all persons whomsoever. IN WITNESS WBEREOl', Grantor bas caused these prcseotl to be executed the day and the~ first above written. . Signed. sealed and deli\l'erect in the presence ot. c:x{.,~~~ I ~~~ Print Name: CALLA WAYLAND It CA1iLECo., LIMI1'1ID ' PAR'INERSHIP, . Florida limited p.rtoership By: CAlLAWAY LAND &,' CA m..E COMPANY, INC., a Plorida COrpora~ØGI ita general pørtnw , " " ~ ~.~:>:., ""By: John W. Holcomb ';:~,;' ; ,', I~: P~~mtt : ' (Corporate Seal) .. 08/18/28e3 ÐS: 45 26.75~61515 - .. KOLTER PAGE 03/Ð5 dwA·. '"ÖlucttJwwr , t':~ Print Name: It CAr ,LA WAyLAND &. CA TiLE COMPANY, INC, a F\arid. Gorporation BY.;?£~ Its: President (Corporate Seat) STATE OF FLOlUDA COUNTY OF MARTIN '!'he foregoing instrument was acknO~&: ~ore me this 2~ day of !'-pril, 1998~ by John W. Holcomb, the President of Callaway de CompaDY~ DC., a Flonda GOrporation, as general pBrtner of Callaway Land & Catt1e Co. Limited P8I:tDe1'SbiP, a Florida ümitcd ~hip, on behalf of the corporation and the li1nited partnet:ship. The' above uamed individual c is personally known to me or, "bas produced ~~'5 L,,,-...: as identification. Print Name: CommJssion Number: Commission expires: CD MY_".,ao_ ÐIPIIII..... "lID ...."...., .....~: ~~ . STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF MARTIN The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me tbi~)' of April, , 1998, by lohn W. Holcomb, the Presidœt of Callaway Land & Cattle Company. Inc., a Florida corporation. on behalf of the cotpot?Ûon. The above named individual c is persœa11y known to 'me or. has produced 0. 'v" ,~. ra.!1: 81 identification. Q. A..v u_ ......, PrintNam~£S' ~ Commission Number:~ ~= Commission expires: ~ð -- C~ Decdl33924U 2 08/18/2003 08:45 5676861515 KOLTER PAGE !!I5/e5 . ¡Ø]) .. EXRIBI'r "Att , t!SEtlVE CœtME1CE CENTER ., Undeveloped Lands O'fll'led by CALLAWAY LAND Sa CATTL! CO. LIMITED PAllTNERSHIP: All that pordoftof Section 15. Township 36,Soutb. I..uge 39 !41st, St. Luc±e-County~,'lorida. situate and bei~1 Southerly and Easterly of the right of way owned ,by Florida Potier aDd L:1.lht CQliapany, and Northerly and Eaaterly of that portion of .aid Section compre~ended by the fo11ow1ng recorded 'Plats: a) G. O. T~ INDUST1IAL pAJX UNIT ONE a. per plat thereof r~corded in Plat Soak 23. pages 31 and 31& and ... b) G. O. ~!AM INDUSTRIAL PAIl UNIT TWO as per plat ~hereof recorded in Plat BOOK Z4, pace 24. -'., Platted Lots Owned by CALLAWAY LAND & CATTLE CO., INC.: tract E, G. O. "tEAK INDUStRIAL pAJU( uøIt ONE, according to the plat thereof recoråed in Plat look 23, pag.. 31 and 32; and Lot 4, Block A and Lot i-A, less the ~orth 146 feet and all of Lot 1, Block B. G. O. TEAM INDUSTI~ P~ UKIT ~O, accordin. eo the plat the~8of recorded in Plat ~ook 2~, pale 24; auð All of Lot. lZ tÞrougb 19. Lots 21 throu~h 24, Bloc~ D, ßnd Lots.5 throûsb R. Block C. &l1d LotL' 1 an~' 2. Block D,' totAlinR 18 lo~8, C.. o. -rUM INDtJSTRtAt PAIl UNtT THREI. accord1na,~o the vlat t~er.of recorde~ in 'lat ~ok 16. nUL it . Composite Exhibit itA" - Pal. 1 of 38 . .. ~ .. ~=~ Kimley·Horn and Associates, Inc. MEMORANDUM . Suite 200 3660 Maguire Boulevard Orlando, Florida 32803 To: Scott Morton From: Chris J. Walsh, P.E. Date: August 13, 2003 Subject: Trip Generation Evaluation of Proposed Future Land Use Changes Reserve DR! A comprehensive plan amendment is being submitted -to chs¡;1ge the FutUre Land Uses for 228.98 acres of the Reserve Development of Regional Impact. The existing Future Land Use designations ~nd Proposed Future Land Use designations are summarized below: Existim! Future Land Use Designation Heavy Industrial Light Industria] Commercia] Genera] Institutional Acreage ", 58.08 33.34 86.37 51.]7 228.98 Acrea2e 54.30 101.77 58.08 8.04 6.79 228.98 . Proposed Future Land Use Designation Residentia] Low (up to 5 unit/acre) Open Space Conservation Heavy Industrial Light Industrial Right-of-way . TEL 407 898 1511 FAX 407 894 4791 '" w ~=~ Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Scott Morton, Kolter Corporation, August 13,2003, Page 2 For the purposes of evaluating the traffic impacts associated with the proposed comprehensive plan amendment a trip generation comparison between the existing Future Land Use and proposed Future Land Use was conducted. Trip generation for the existing Industrial and Commercial Future Land Uses was '. based on 1,600,000 square feet of industria] and 290,000 square feet of shòpping center, which are the maximum intensities anowed under the currently approved development program for the Reserve DRI. For the Institutiona] acreage;'f! high- school of 1,800 students was assumed. This comprehensive plan amendment is being submitted COJlcurrent with a Notice of Proposed Change to reduce the overall development program for the Reserve DRI. In particular, the industria] development will be reduced from 1,600,000 square feet to 500,000 square feet. Therefore, trip generation for the proposed Industria] Future Land Use of 66.12 acres was estimated based on 500,000 square feet. The Residential Low designation will allow for a maximum density of five units per acre. Therefore, trip generation for the Residentia] Low Future Land Use designation was based on the development of 272 dwelling units (54.3 acres x 5 units/acre). For the Open Space Recreation area, a park called Baseball World is proposed. A detailed trip generation projection for this development, as approved by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, is included in the Reserve NOPC Traffic Ana]ysis and the PGA Village ADA. Therefore, for the purposes of this analysis, that same trip generation projection was used for the Open Space Conversation Future Land Use. A copy of the trip generation table from the Reserve NOPC traffic analysis is attached. As summarized in Table I, the maximum development allowed under the existing Future Land Use designations for the subject 228.98 acres will generate 28,586 total daily trips and 3,667 total PM peak hour trips. The maximum development allowed under the proposed Future Land Use designations will generate 8,768 total daily trips ,and 926 total PM peak hour trips. Therefore, the proposed changes to the Future Land Use designations for the subject 228.98 acres will reduce the trip generation ~', .,. . ~ - ~=~ Kimley·Horn and Associates, Inc. Scott Morton, Kolter Corporation, August 13, 2003, Page 3 potential for the subject property by approximately 75%. It should also be noted that traffic impacts associated with development of the 228.98 acres as well as for the entire Reserve DRI will be addressed as part of the Development Regiona'Nmpact process. " " ''" H:\04910S002. The Reserve\2003 Analysis\Reserve NOPC\Reserve-FLUamendmenl.doc ..', ',. " " ~ -- Trip Generation Comparison Between Existing and Proposed Future land Use Designations - Reserve CRt Existing Future Land Use Designation for Subject 228.98 Acres , --- - (¿! :(;-~ ~?~'-----~~--l ~ ~"':-'~l~ffiríiTo '-;-0-' -~'l"~ '1i;-Jh~l ~_~~~~j ~!~~~~~~-= ~ ~:;J _ ~..."~".", .".......:..,~.~.,.J__~_"_~_ ,._~__,~.~_".. ,L__ ·~'~:\':i.l_~_," [""iJi". L.·[·l~l "_L.:f¡(·~N] General Light Industrial 1.600,000 SF 11,847 255 1,874 2,129 High School' 1 ,800 Students 3,222 108 162 270 Shopping Center 290,000 SF 13,517 609 659 1,268 Total 28,586 972 2,695 3,667 Proposed Future Land Use Designation for Subject 228.98 Acres :---..... , ,-- r:;-¡iinrt;f,:;~,.~~~w']~~~"'"""!'~1m~~"'7-:~T~~1~J~r~ " "' r_ \" . :. r ~~...,.",.~ r"'''-~~''''''''''_ r~"""""'-~'''''''~ ". _ _.....:.: ~:2:..;,_.~~L:';:'" l...'.,"'-';;:..h_....:,.~~__..",:_~.·::.:._c.:'-:h ~.:.:~5.@:L~~_ ~ .,:.:.1/1.1",_.] A1£bl~ ~K~1~lJ General Light Industrial 500,000 SF 3,632 66 487 553 Single-Family 272 DU 2,603 169 95 264 Baseball World 101.77 AC 2,533 152 152 109 Total 8,768 387 734 926 General Liaht Industrial CITE 6th Edition) Daily (ITE 110) T = 7.468 x (10oo's of SF) -101,921 PM Peak Hour (ITE 110) T = 1.433 x (1000's of SF) - 163.421 50% In 12% In 50% Out 88% Out Hiah School CITE 6th Edition) Daily (ITE 530) , PM Peak Hour (ITE 530) T = 1,79 x (number of Students) T = 0.15 x (number of Students) 50% In 40% In 50% Out 60% Out " , " ShoDDina Center CITE 6th Edition) Daily (ITE 820) - Ln(T) = 0,643 x Ln(1000's of SF) + 5.866 PM Peak Hour (ITE 820) Ln(T) = 0,660 x Ln(1000's of SF) + 3.403 50% In 48% In 50% Out 52% Out SinQle-Familv Detached Housina CITE 6th Edition) Daily (ITE 210) Ln(T) = 0,920 x Ln(number of DU's) + 2.707 PM Peak Hour (ITE 210) Ln(T) = 0,901 x Ln(number of DU's) +0.527 50% In 64% In 50% Out 36% Out Baseball World Trip Generation Estimates from Baseball World were obtained from the PGA Village DRI ADA H:\049105002\2003Analysis\ReserveNOPC\landUsePlan,xfs BnI2003 9:36 AM .. .. r:; ..... o eN o · ~~ I!~ u "' e- .. ::J oS .e. c3 ~N .. .. ::J III o "' x.c .0- ~..... "' .. .. ~ D... :EIII 0.... a: .. .c I- -4 ¡¡ ~,~ E· ~ ~ø.. 0 ..:IE B lUll. ~ ~;:NCJ')Ø)OU')"'N;!~~ ......011)... ,....... __.. - ~ ~ i~g ;~~~~o~~n~~~ IU II. = -. Eo. .;: š~ -. Eo. .;: 1'- ..- ..... "E:E ...~ iíf.S ..- ..... "E:E ...~ ';/!.= " .>C 0 .::Q.= õ II. "E: ~ "'2'" " II. · CI ,.,- -" iiõ 0... ."" ~ '#"I-"lft'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'#'J!. . ooooooooooo~ II II. 'Ð " :> ~::æ?~2~N~~~~~~ :; o 'Ð " ~1I)~~~~tÐ..~~~:!~ SJ .5 'Ð 't.,#"I-'#'#'J!."{.'J!.'#'J!.'J!.,#'# ':f")~""":~~8·~C!C!'C!N~ :;N~~~r;_;;~~~cò~ o §~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~,..:Ñ...~a8...·ooU)NN ..5 _N _NV')Ø)N....N :~ .. :> II. 0 2B L~ ¡æ~:~N~~~~~; .>C"O II C .. :> II. 0 2..0 11.= cø~aoO.ØtOV)NNl")m tØ::~II)c»_U)U)N~l")g ~~U;13:g-;!~CJ)ð;~ UJ_N__N__"..,_ . ::;2~~N8V):!g..,~~~ tDCJ.....N ID"CÐ"''''I'')~ "'~NNNN__U>N_~ ~~ ..- o .. ...c e ~, 11.- o 00 ggOO_D:!~_:!gg g~::;:::!::!Zw)""zg~- IØ -... .. .. :J ,; c .. J 5 e : ::> o .c iL ! ¡¡: !!? E !(! - Ã! .:¡ ~,~ I";; ;I~. J: II. -iSo I-:::iii- ~~ "e'g ='ÐO:>~"!..fD. i ~ S ..:~¡~ ~~ ~ II Š 3~j~I!I!Eæi~Õ2 ! ~ lil~ : : ,; ~ 0':; ! i .":2--- OO.Q.~ i:i:¡~l~~~=Ii.2 (!)CI)a:::rI=I=a.Ol!ifDClcn .. . t:1 u OOOO-o(o(o(~~.o(OO :: Ñ t:':,n Z Z Z .. .. z ;:. :: .. .. ~ II ... .... -t .. .. .. .. .. .. :!. " . .c "'''' .. . .. z. ~ :I .. ... ~5 ~r ;i ... .. . 0 & .. Q ~ ,:¡ e i ! Ii :I . .s ~ Ii Q Q 'j ! ~ e :; ¡ -;~ 'ÌÎ & ¡-s .;¡i ! i t ¡! : f' ....I ¡ II"... l ~ illi f 11~ ¡tŠI ~ s:l·· o ~. 'f ¡ ~ i~.5 ~ ~ 1P'£;g ~ .: IZS' .. 'II .-i1i ; =: =š-> :;;2£ 'I,¡¡!~ ,so,! "~...!: 1!;! §ëj.t S!~:.J16" 1tr:¡j1æ!~ : Z.!-" J 'i': ;, ~ ! . ! .: I. !. ~ U1t~;-1It! ij~IIZiõ,¡ ilII! 1\ i It es s:.ztS ls,l~~gs J·~f!1~.¡t ·""'f.. fJ'j;j·¡J' ¡'J II g . I ;1!f1i~! 't.¡:,,1{er tr:&}]~!t~ i'ISillll 1'1i!.o-õ I¡i.';í!! .; o....s :;1":"'¡_1 iilif¡j= Ijj!J~II) 1JI~ i!il ¡Iii '-:.1 ·~!&J'li'l ¡fultil ~~!~ f I · . . .. . _"....11ft . t f ..', JE. !5 .! · £; o ... .. · i t · ... :¡ o lID .. C' ~ f f! it K ! 1 i .s ~ ë I e f " · ¡ " '" ::: ó · it :z: -: ... '" ~ .. s .. ..; · i' e. .. .. '" ... .. ... .. ... ... ... o ... ... ... ... ,,; .. " ~ I, .... ~ e I ...,~ ... ;;¡ ~ -, II ~ ] i ¡ ~ 1 ~ ~ ~ j j f ! ~ ! ! ~ ~ ~ f ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ,..:a I:;¡l.!~ Ð Ð ~ ~ , ö 1 1 J g ! I ~ ~ ~ ~ J ~ ~ 0 ~ I I ~ ,....rl,rfälll ði QJ~~~~&~~ll ~ ~II[[][]II~~ID 'è¡"IJ.9§t I Ç1J~Ç1J~ðJ:: ~ :§ ~ ~ ~ .~ f} 0° ~r\~~u ~ ~~ ""'-4 ~V5 ~ J9 :§ ~ ~ tJ /" ~ Q¡ 'E ~ ðj ~ i: ;j fa' , ~ §... '" oäj " r:Q 'õ~ ~C!I,::S "5' ~ " ~ '. PRELIMINARY RESPONSES TO THE QUESTIONS SUBMITTED BY INTERESTED PROPERTY OWNERS AT THE RESERVE. STATUS OF THE EXISTING DEVELOPMENT ORDER FOR THE RESERVE DRI 1.) The full traffic analysis of the Reserve DRI is part of the NOPC but is not included in your Workshop background material. Correct, The traffic analysis portion of the report was not included in the material copies, Copies of it have been distributed to the board, Copies of the report have been previously transmitted to county staff for review and copies have been previously made available to other interested parties to review. 2,) Map H attached to your Workshop agenda is not current. Correct, we did not have the most current map of the PGA Villages in a small reproducible format, The map we sent out was just for general location purposes, 3,) What is the criteria for a "Substantial Deviation" from a DRI? Shifting 800-1,000 homes to an area unplanned for the traffic, and adding a major recreation center and its traffic, appear to me to be "substantial" changes regardless of a policy manual dictum. The criteria for what is and what is not a substantial deviation to a Development of Regional Impact isfound in Chapter 380,06, Florida Statutes, 4.) Reduction in the number of units from 4,100 to 3,200, while maybe technically accurate for the Reserve DRI, is not accurate due to the plans Kolter has of adding 800-1,000 homes from the new PGA Village DRI back in to our homeowners'association, The proposed change to the Development Order for the Reserve is all that the County has direct control or comments authority on. The County does not regulate the size, structure or composition of a homeowners group, This appears more appropriately to be matter that is to be . 1 . resolved between the Kolter Group and the current members of the Reserve homeowners association. 5,) The changes in land use designation for the recreation area (see Comprehensive Plan Amendment), including 750 parking spaces and dormitories, needs thorough review for impact on nearby neighborhoods and traffic volumes and flow, The Comp, Plan Amendments referenced in the submitted NOPC are for property in the City of Port St. Lucie, The County's role is advisory in this matter. 6,) # 46, p,21-22 of the proposed 7th amendment to the Development Order to the Reserve DRI: The $5,000 contribution to a homeowners' association by the developer for recreational facilities is not adequate, This is a probably better treated as internal matter to the reserve. If there is a better number to be looked at, we need to know what everyone can agree to, 7.) P, 5 of the proposed 7th amendment: Why are 21 paragraphs of the D,O, being deleted? Please clarify your cites. What 21 paragraphs are you referencing? 8.) #15, p,13 of the proposed 7th amendment: Are 490 acres of native upland habitat currently in the Reserve DRI being "traded over "to the new PGA Village DRI? No, The intent of this amendment is to allow only that part of the 490 acres found in the city of port st, lucie to be potentially eligible for relocation, consistent with city regulation on the topic, IT is anticipated that nay relocation would only be done in conjunction with the field of dreams development activities, 9,) Has the TCRPC approved or commented on the NOPC and the proposed Comp Plan Amendment? If so, what are their comments? If not, what is their deadline for action? The TCRPC is not an approval authority on the NOPC. They are comment agency only. We have not received any comments from the RPC or the DCA in regard to these proposed - 2- amendments, The deadline for any comments would be prior to the public hearing on this matter, which has been held in abeyance pending the outcome of the discussion at this workshop. 10,) Same question regarding FDOT review of the NOPC and proposed Comp Plan Amendment? Same answer, 11.) What is the schedule for the BOCC to consider the amended D,O. to the Reserve DRI and the proposed Comp Plan Amendment? Not set yet, It was tentatively set, a few months ago, to be January 20, 2004. That has been put off until tthe outcome of the discussion at this workshop, 12,) Traffic analysis: · Has the BOCC had time to fully consider the impacts of the new PGA Village DRI on the Reserve and the surrounding area? The Board needs to answer this? · Do you agree with the traffic analysis provided by the developer in the NOPC? Technical or policy level? · Will the transportation system in the area function as envisaged? If the cited improvements are done, the technical answer is yes, it should. · Trip generation charts base projections on the density of the Reserve being 2,250 single family and condos/townhomes in 2008 and 2,750 in 2013 at build-out. These figures appear greatly understated, Will check it. - 3- TWO INTERNAL ROADWAY CONNECTIONS 1, Comment: the City approved the new PGA Village DRI requiring the two connections, Kolter and the City assumed the County would make the connections. The County planning staff has been fully aware of these plans, and has been planning Parcel 34B (The Lakes with Champions Way) and Parcel 38 (Saddlebrook extension and 6 homesites) with Kolter over the past 18-24 months. 2, Comment: The residents of the Reserve want the original boundaries of the Reserve to remain intact. The residents do not want to be forced to be connected to PGA Village South, 3. Comment: We understand that Parcel 38 was not permitted under the original DR!. The County planning process on Parcel 38 has not included residents of the Reserve. 4. Comment: The developer is trying to "retrofit" a new property (PGA Village) onto the Reserve and it does not fit. The roadways in the original Reserve were designed to handle traffic and volumes from specific residential areas. Shifting the burden of traffic of 800-1,000 homes to new, unplanned areas (Saddlebrook and Champions Way) fails, 5, The County planning process ignores the input of the community and residents who will be most impacted by changes. Simply because a project meets basic minimal standards of a policy is not good enough in the real world, 6. See letter from Doug Anderson to Don Cooper dated 11/14/03 for background statement on the problems with the connections, - 4- 7, What is the status of the plat notation on Parcel34B since the BOCC action on 1O/28/03? What specific conditions are noted for this connection to be opened in the future? On hold pending workshop discussion 8, In building six spec or model homes in Parcel 38, the developer is reneging on promises made to homeowners not to build in that area, 9. What is the status of the DRC consideration of Parcel 38? On hold pending workshop discussion 10, Why is there no Planning and Zoning Board discussion, hearing and vote of a "Major Adjustment" (Parcel 38)? Its not required under our current procedures, unless the Board determines that the proposed changes need to go back to planning and zoning for review and comments, 11. What is the schedule for BOCC hearing and vote on the Major Adjustment (Parcel 38)? Not set yet, 12. Internal Traffic Comments (11/5/03): . No projected impact on Saddlebrook Drive · No projected impact on much of Plantation Lakes Drive · Traffic observations done in 2001 are not valid due to rapid growth of the Reserve · What time of year and time of day were the observations made? · The "Quantity of Units" chart misstates the number of units 10 several neighborhoods · Traffic engineers figure that each house generates on average 10 car trips per day, That means the 800-1,000 homes in the north parcel of PGA Village South - 5- -- will generate 8-10,000 trips per day, Surely the Saddlebrook and Champions Way connections cannot handle that amount of traffic, POSSIBLE OPTIONS FOR INTERNAL ROADWAY CONNECTIONS 1, The Property Owners of the Reserve (PORI) have met four times with Kolter representatives, as recently as January 2, To date, we have had no definitive responses to ideas and proposals that have been discussed, 2. I recommend that the County work closely with the City and Kolter to establish a connection from the north parcel in PGA Village South directly onto Commerce Center Drive, PETITIONS 1, Approximately 500 residents of the Reserve have signed a petition which opposes the two internal connections, extending Saddlebrook Drive, building six spec homes and including any of the homes in the new PGA Village South in the Reserve Master HOA. - 6-