Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 08-17-99AUGUST 17. 1999 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME RAL RULES AND PROCEDURES Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS- These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed REigr to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON -AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting for general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, Fla. 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS www.stlucieco.gov AGENDA August 17, 1999 6:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE J-) MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held August 10, 1999. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 3. CONSENT AGENDA PUBLIC HEARINGS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT John D. Bruhn District 1 Doug Coward District 2 Paula A. Lewis District 3 Frannie Hutchinson District 4 Cliff Barnes District 5 A. Resolution No. 99-182/Fort Pierce Air Center/Quasi-Judicial- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport to construct a 12,000 square foot hangar (Hangar 13) Location: 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Lucie County International Airport; Hangar 13 B. Resolution No. 99-150/Marlene Hadden/Quasi-Judicial- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home. Location: 3120 Avenue Q C. Resolution No. 99-186/Dreida McNair/Quasi-Judicial- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home. Location: 3009 Anderson Drive. Resolution No. 99-149/Anthony Coscia &, Sons, L.c./Quasi-Judicial- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a change in zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) zoning district to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) zoning district. Location: West side of South SR A-1-A, directly across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase 2. NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. it LOM REGULAR AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE TWO PUBLIC HEARINGS (CON'T) COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (CON'T) solution No. 99-148/Croce Giambanco/Quasi-Judicial- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a change in zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) zoning district to the I (Institutional) zoning district. Location: 6609 North U.S. Highway No.1 Ordinance No. 99-017- This is the first of two required public hearings. Consider staff �— recommendation to approve the ordinance amending Section 7.10.16(Q)(1)(a)(1)(c), of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to provide for the clarification of common use areas to refer to public or private road rights -of -way. Resolution No. 99-134/Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc./Quasi-Judicial- This public hearing is continued from the July 20,1999 Board meeting. Consider staff recommendation to approve bthe resolution granting a change in zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) zoning district ✓fo the I (Institutional) zoning district. Location: North side of Orange Avenue, approximately / `11011,000 feet west of Rock Road. 4H. Resolution No. 99-135/Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc./Quasi-Judicial- This public hearing is icontinued from the July 20,1999 Board meeting. Consider staff recommendation to approve / the resolution granting a Conditional Use Permit to allow educational services in the I (Institutional) zoning district. Locatio North, side of Orange Avenue4a�:roxi ately 1,000 v st of Rock Road. Re lution No. 99-140/Lakewood Park Autowash/Quasi-Judicial- Consider stafff'b" ecommendation to approve the resolution granting a 12-month extension for an approved �— f Conditional Use Permit and site plan approval to allow for the development of a car wash in / CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) zoning district. Location: West side of Turnpike Feeder Ro d, approximately 200 feet south of Winter Garden Parkway 4 Ordinance No. 99-003-This is the second of two required public hearings and is continued from �1 the July 20, 1999 Board. meeting. Consider staff recommendation to approve the ordinance l/ amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to provide for additional standards and regulations governing land clearing and yard waste recycling operations in the unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County. 4K. Ordinance No. 99-004- This is the second of two required pubic hearings and is continued from 4/� C' the July 6, 1999 Board meeting. Consider staff recommendation to direct that the ordinance including the definition of contiguity and gross density as amended be readvertised and / C reconsidered by the Planning and Zoning Commission. n� COLWY ATTORNEY cp L. solution No. 99-210- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution authorizing -ei- he South Florida Recycling, Inc. Capital Projects Finance Authority Bond Issue and authorize �' the Chairman to sign the resolution. 10 '4ar *Am# CONSENT AGENDA August 17, 1999 0 WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 45. f 2. t&UBLIC WORKS V� Lennard Road- Consider staff recommendation to approve the appraisal, title work, environmental phase I and boundary survey of the Louis Corcetti property for future Lennard Road construction. 3. PURCHASING A. Y2K Funding and Kronos Agreement- Consider staff recommendation to approve transfer of funds and acquisition of equipment upgrades to the Libraries and Emergency Operations Center and the Kronos time clock system. Authorize the Chairman to sign the Kronos Agreement. B. Bid No. 99-64- Consider staff recommendation to award the bid for campsite electrical replacement for area two at the Savannas Campground to Pipeline Energy in the amount of $26,804.12 including the Public Construction Bond. Authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. 4. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Assignment of Revocable License Agreement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the assignment of the January 16, 1990 Revocable License Agreement from Paul Miret and Karen Miret to Richard S. Love and Barbara J. Love. B. Appointment of Successor Paying Agent and Registrar- Consider staff recommendation to approve the Agreement of Resignation, Appointment and Acceptance and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement for the Escrow Deposit Agreement dated February 19,1997, for the County's North Hutchinson Island Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 1992. 5. ADMINISTRATION Settlement Agreement- Consider staff recommendation to approve the settlement agreement with the DEP for payment of $5,761.45 for printing of the initial Regional Attenuation Task Force report. LEISURE SERVICES Specialist Agreement - Consider staff recommendation to approve the specialist agreement with Alma Lewis and authorize the Chair to sign. 7. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET A. Budget Resolution No. 99-208- Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget resolution appropriating funds for the Federal Section 112 MPO Planning grant passed through the Florida Department of Transportation in the amount of $326,798 for the period from 7/1/99 to 6/30/00. B. Permission to apply- Consider staff recommendation to approve electronic submission of the application for the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant on behalf of the Sheriffs Office, and authorize the Chairman to sign the application. WMW CONSENT AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1999 PAGE TWO 7. MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET (CON'T) C. Resolution No. 99-209- Consider staff recommendation to approve the budget resolution increasing the current budget for the FDEP White City Park grant by $6,099. D. Budget Amendment No. 99-131/Equipment Request No. 99-225- Consider staff recommendation to approve the amendment transferring $8,000 and the equipment request for the purchase of back up batteries for the Automated Services power supply. 8. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Economic Development- Consider staff recommendation to approve a not to exceed amount of $1,215 to place a joint ad with the Chamber of Commerce in the 2000 Florida Trend magazine "Business Florida" publication. M BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: August 10, 1999 Convened: 9:00 a.m. Tape: 1-2 Adjourned: 11:59 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Paula A. Lewis, John D. Bruhn, Frannie Hutchinson, Cliff Barnes, Doug Coward Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator; Phil Freeland, Asst. County Administrator; Dan McIntyre, County Attorney; Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director; Ray Wazny, Public Works Director; Paul Phillips, Airport Director; Jim David, Mosquito Control Director; Bill Blazak, Utilities Director; Jack Southard, Public Safety Director; Mike Bowers, Road and Bridge Manager; DonCole, Acquisitions Manager; Nick Dragash, Central Services Manager; Gayla Barwick, Tourism Manager; Don McLam, Recreation Manager; Undersheriff Williams, Maj. Lillie Miller, Corrections; Deputy Williams; A. Millie Delgado, Deputy Clerk Note: Due to the failure of audio/recording equipment, Board comments are limited. 1. MINUTES (1-026) It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Coin. Coward, to approve the minutes of the meeting held July 27, 1999 as corrected; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. CONSENT AGENDA (1-068) It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the Consent Agenda, with item C-8B pulled until further information is obtained-, and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List Nos. 42,43 and 44. 2. PUBLIC WORKS A. Road and Bridge- The Board approved the Extension and First Amendment to the contract with Green Scapes, Inc., for mowing services for Subdivision 3 and authorized the Chairman to sign. B. Road and Bridge- The Board approved the Extensions and First Amendments to Contracts C-96-10-087 and C-96-10-086 with Daniel M. Barker, for mowing sevices for Subdivisions 1 and 2 and authori.zPd the Chairman to sign. —1— � `w" C. Engineering- The Board approved Work Authorization No. 15 for Hazen and Sawyer for hydrological data of the Platt's Creek mitigation area in the amount of $12,710. MANAGEMENT/BUDGET A. Budget Resolution No. 99-204- The Board approved the resolution appropriating the anticipated reimbursement from Media One and budgeting the expense in the County Administrator's budget as a Professional Service. B. Budget Amendment 99-129- The Board approved the amendment funding the Smithsonian Marine Center Research Project and authorized the County Attorney to prepare and the Chairman to execute a standard agreement to transmit the requested funds. 4. PUBLIC SAFETY Agreement Renewal- The Board approved the renewal of the Dictaphone Agreement from 10-1-99 through 9-3 0-00 and authorized the Chairman to sign the agreement. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE A. Engineering- The Board approved Work Authorization No. 5 with Jenkins and Charland, Engineers, Inc., in the amount of $5,280 for bridge design revision to the Orange Avenue and C 57 Bridge Replacement Project. B. Engineering- The Board approved Work Authcrization No. 6 with Jenkins and Charland, Inc., in the amount of $1,980 for bridge design for the S. 25'' St., bridge over Ten Mile Creek and authorized the Chairman to sign. C. Engineering- The Board approved Work Authorization No. 7 with Jenkins and Charland, Inc., in the amount of $2,000 for engineering services related to construction management for the Keen Road over Belcher Canal (C-25) Bridge Replacement Project and authorized Chairman to sign. D. S. 25'' St./Phase 1- The Board approved Resolution No. 99-206 accepting donated property from Mrs. Blanche Childers, and authorized staffto close on the property. 6. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Lakewood Park Street Renaming- The Board approved Resolutions No. 99-172 through 99-177 renaming Seminole Road to East Seminole Road or West Seminole Road. B. Becker Road Right of Way- The Board approved advertising a Notice of Intent to Abandon, and authorized the Chairman to execute the Abandonment Petition and proceed with the abandonment petition. C. Victory Blvd., Right of Way- The Board approved advertising the Notice of Intent to Abandon Victory Blvd., and authorized the Chairman to execute the Abandonment Petition and proceed with the abandonment petition. D. Settlement of Claim- The Board approved acc-1ptmg a check in the amount of $34,275 in settlement of the claim against David Hazellief and C TU Insurance Company. E. Resolution No. 99-203- The Board approved the resolution for the right of way dedication from EKE Mobile a.k.a. Ekonomy Enterprises, instruct staff to authorize the recording of the Warranty Deed and Resolution by Simmons & Clyne, P.A. -2- F. Resolution No. 99-207- The Board approved the resolution supplementing Resolution No. 94-196 as amended and as supplemented by Resolutions 98-47, 97-283 and 97-311, providing for the issuance of not to exceed $190,000 combined special assessment bonds for the Anita Street, Lost Tree Estates and Timberlake's MSBU's to refinance the cost of utility, paving and drainage improvements and approving the proposal of NationsBank N.A. for the purchase of the bonds. G. Impact Fee Study- The Board approved the proposed agreement with James C. Nicholas, PhD, and Julian Juergensmeyer, authorized the Chairman to execute the Agreement, and further authorize the County Administrator to use contingency funds for the County's portion of the project. 7. PERMISSION TO ADVERTISE'PUBLIC HEARINGS A. County Attorney- The Board approved advertising a public hearing on Abandonment of a portion of Abbott Street (Right of Way) in the Ridgehaven Area, to be held on September 7, 1999. B. County Attorney- The Board approved advertising a public hearing on Ordinance No. 99- 11, deleting the Port and Airport Authority from the definition of County Employee and by creating a section in the Code to provide for the payment of food and promotional expenses incurred while promoting the common interest of St. Lucie County, to be held on September 7, 1999. C. County Attorney- The Board approved advertising a public hearing on Ordinance No. 99- 10 amending the Alarm Systems Ordinance, to be held on August 24, 1999. D. Community Development- The Board approved advertising the following public hearings for August 17, 1999 at 6:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. Anthony Coscia & Sons, L.C., for a change in zoning from CN zoning district to HIRD zoning district. Fort Pierce Air Center- (Ernesto Velasco, Agent) for a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport to construct a 12,000 square foot hangar. Croce Giambanco, for a change in zoning from the CG zoning district to the I zoning district. Marlene Hadden, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home. Lakewood Park Autowash, to approve a 1.2 Tr+ rth extension for an approved Conditional Use Permit and site plan approval to allow for the cl:;velopment of a car wash in CN zoning district. Dreida McNair, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential Lome. Pippin Tractor, for a change in zoning from the AR-1 zoning district to the CG Commercial General. Ordinance No. 99-004- amending Section 2.00.:10, Definitions, of the St. Lucie County land Development Code, to provide for the addition of a definition of the term contiguous and to amend the definition of gross density(second public hearing). -3- Ordinance No. 99-017- amending Section 7-10'. 16 (Q)(1)(a)(1)(c), of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to provide For the clarification of common use areas to refer to public or private road rights .of way (first public hearing) E. Mosquito Control- The Board approved the Blueway Advisory Committee advertising fora.nd hold a public hearing on September 22,1999 at 5:00 p.m. for the Pepper Park Beach Management Plan. . F. Mosquito Control- The Board approved the Blueway Advisory Committee advertising for and hold a public hearing on September 22, 1999 at 5:00 p.m. for the Coon Island Park Management Plan. 8. LEISURE SERVICES A. Waste Tire Grant- The Board declared sole source for Play/Space Services, and approved the expenditure of Waste Tire Grant fiends for various items for park and beach locations. B. Recreation Facilities Exchange- This item was pulled until further information is obtained. 9. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Tourism- The Board approved payment of the, July invoices to R.J. Gibson in the amount of $3,853.89. 10. ADMINISTRATION FEC Railroad Crossing- The Board approved reimbursements to Old Park Investment/ Harbortown Marina of $2,000 for legal costs incurred as a result of granting a temporary easement for the railroad crossing bypass. 11. PURCHASING A. Permission to Advertise- The Board approved advertising for bids for an Archaeological Survey. B. Permission to Advertise- The Board approve;: advertising for bids for portable toilet units for various parks. 12. CENTRAL SERVICES A. Contract Extension- The Board approved extending the contract with Paragon Termite And Pest Management through June 24, 2006. B. Bid No.99-58- The Board approved awarding the bid for additions and renovations to the Rock Road Jail Booking area to Adrian Investment and Development in the amount of $548,900 and approved the additional fiinding including contingencies in the amount of $220,000. REGULAR AGENDA 4. COUNTY ATTORNEY (1-1512) A. Job Growth Investment Fund Grant Application- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to approve the application submitted by Bee Electronics, Inc., and authorize the Chairman to sign the application. -4- M Com. Coward expressed his concerns with the fact that the jobs listed are just above the minimum wage and stated he felt the County needed to raise it's standards. It was the consensus of the Board to direct staff to re -visit the Job Growth Incentive criteria regarding the wages in St. Lucie County and bring it back to the Board for review. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Coward; Aye's: Barnes; Hutchinson, Bruhn, Lewis; motion carried by a vote of 4 to 1. B. Agreement Amendment- For consideration before the Board, was staff recommendation to approve the proposed First Amendment +o the Agreement with the Brisben Family Limited Partnership. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. C. Platt's Creek Off -Site Mitigation- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to approve the Option Agreement for Parcel 85 and authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement. Com. Barnes expressed his concerns with utilizing funds from the ESL funds and suggested $70,000 be taken from the general fund. Com. Coward concurred with Com. Barnes Com. Lewis stated she was in support of the project. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward' borrow the $70,000 from Contingency rather than from the general fund; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. D. Hidden River Estates Drainage Retrofit- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to direct staff to renegotiate with the property owners, attempt to lower the counteroffer and resubmit any new counteroffers. , It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Hutchinson, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. ADNMI;ISTRATION (1-3395) Jetty Park- Com. Barnes requested discussion on the purchase of the property near Jetty Park in conjunction with the City of Fort Pierce. Com. Bruhn expressed his concerns with the amount --C parking spaces the city may require. Com. Barnes advised Com. Bruhn that these details can be negotiated with the city and he suggested that the city be made aware of the fact that the county is interested in purchasing the property at a 2/3 county; 1/3 city share cost. He also suggested a workshop be scheduled and during the negotiations the county can attempt to work with the city in purchasing the entire piece of property. Com. Lewis asked to review the 1977 Charrette before the workshop and requested all quotes be updated. Com. Coward stated he was not sure what portion of the property was to be purchased. The County Attorney suggested staff negotiate an option agreement. Com. Hutchinson stated she could not coin;ii to 2 s ;,-tiiout knowing what it will actually being going for and stated she concurred with the County Attom—ly's suggestion. -5- **Sol `w0, Com. Coward stated he also was comfortable with the County Attorney's suggestion and advised the Board that he preferred to leave the property on the tax roll and have someone in the private sector negotiate for the property. It was moved by Com. Barnes to let the city know that the county is willing to purchase the property at a 2/3 - 1/3 share and begin negotiations for the option agreement immediately; motion died for lack of second. After continued discussion, it was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward to negotiate the option agreement and discuss the other details at a later date; upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT (2-0771) A. Central Florida Foreign Trade Zone- For consideration before the Board was the request of the Treasure Coast Enterprises, LLC to transfer 15 acres from the St. Lucie County International Airport to Lots 3-9 of the Crossroads Park of Commerce to be designated as part of the Foreign Trade Zone. It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the request as presented; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. Economic Development Billboards- For consideration before the Board was a request for authorization to finalize the design of the economic development billboard and place it at the Landfill. The Board discussed a different design for the billboard. It was the consensus of the Board to ask fora new design which illustrated more of the Marine and Agricultural research which is presently taking place in the county and return to the Board with the new design for approval. 7. UTILITIES/RECYCLING (2-2138) Developer's Agreement- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to approve the agreement for The Breakers Landing Condominium Association, Inc., on North Hutchinson Island. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve staff recommendation, and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 8. AUTOMATED SERVICES (2-2414) A. HTE Contract- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to approve the contract with HTE for the Public Safety Police Records computer system. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Barnes, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. B. Budget Resolution No. 99-205- For consideration before the Board was staff recommendation to approve the resolution to establish the budget for loan proceeds for automated data services projects and authorize the staff to prepare a loan agreement with Commercial and Municipal Capital and authorize the Chairman to sign. Com. Bruhn stated his opposition to this loan which he Jelt places the county in more debt. Com. Coward concurred with Com. Bruhn's comments. It was moved by Com. Barnes,(at this time, the gavel was passed to the Vice Chairman) seconded by Com. Lewis; to approve staff recommendation to include the new amount of $535,000; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay's: Coward, Bruhn, Aye's: Hutchinson, Lewis, Barnes; motion carried by a vote of 3 to 2. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned at 11:59 a.m. 3 Clerk of Circuit Court Chairman -7- *401TEM NO. 4A DATE: 08/17/99 CONSENT [ ] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg. [ ] Quasi -JD [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTEDBY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Community Development J0cico �"L Community Dev. Dir. SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 99-182 approving the request of the Ft. Pierce Air Center for a Major Adjustment to the Existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport for Property Located at 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Lucie County International Airport. BACKGROUND: The Ft. Pierce Air Center, has submitted an application for a Major Adjustment to the Existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport for the project known as Ft. Pierce Air Center to allow for the construction of a 12,000 square foot hangar (Hangar E-13) for property located at 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Lucie County International Airport. FUNDS AVAT -AR N/A PREVIOUS ACTTON: On September 2, 1997, this Board approved a major adjustment to the St. Lucie County International Airport for an additional 12,250 square feet of space to the Ft. Pierce Air Center. On February 17, 1998, this Board approved the addition of 13,000 square feet of space consisting of 12,000 square feet of hangar space and 1,000 square feet of office space to the Ft. Pierce Air Center. On January 19, 1999 this Board approved the addition of 3,360 square feet of office space. On May 4, 1999, this Board approved the addition of 4,800 square feet of hangar space. COMMMISSION ACTION: [ /] APPROVED [ [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: Originating Department: Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 99-182 authorizing a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport. ] DENIED Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Management & Budget: Other: Do 491 Coune M. Anderson Administrator Purchasing: Other: COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-182 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Community Development Director Date: August 11, 1999 Subject: Consider Resolution 99-182 approving the request of The Ft. Pierce Air Center for a Major Adjustment to the Existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport for Property Located at 2982 Curtis King Boulebard, St. Lucie County International Airport. The Ft. Pierce Air Center -Hangar has applied for a major adjustment to the existing St. Lucie County International Airport Conditional Use to allow for the addition of 12,000 square feet of hangar space (Hangar E-13) for property located at 2982 Curtis King Boulevard. Staff has reviewed the request for a major adjustment to an existing conditional use and has determined that it is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Comprehensive Plan, and the Airport Master Plan. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 99-182, if approved, would grant this request for a Major Adjustment to the St. Lucie County International Airport Existing Conditional Use. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 99-182. SUBMITTED: Julia Shewchuk, AICP Community Development Director cc: Paul Phillips R. Errol Houck Ernesto Velasco, P.E. File '*SW 1 2 3 4 5 6 RESOLUTION 99-182 FILE NO.: BCC-99-008\SPMn_99-016 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A MAJOR ADJUSTMENT TO THE EXISTING ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT CONDITIONAL USE FOR THE PROJECT KNOWN AS THE FT. PIERCE AIR CENTER - HANGAR 13 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Pursuant to Section 3.3.122(7) of the St. Lucie County Zoning Ordinance, effective July 1, 1984, and Section 3.01.03(W)(7)(a) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, effective August 1, 1990, the St. Lucie County International Airport is considered to be an existing Conditional Use. 2. The Ft. Pierce Air Center has been operating as a Fixed Base Operations Center (FBO) on a 21.0 acre leased parcel since 1987. This FBO is located on the western side of the existing airport grounds. The Ft. Pierce Air Center has applied for a major adjustment to their existing conditional use permit to allow an additional 12,000 square foot hangar (Hangar E-13). 3. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the proposed Major Adjustment - to an Existing Conditional Use and found it to be in substantial conformity with the overall Airport Master Plan. 4. On August 17,1999, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 5. The proposed Major Adjustment to an Existing Conditional Use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.07.05(E), of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Major Adjustment to the Existing St. Lucie County International Airport Conditional Use, is hereby approved for the property described as follows: File No.: BCC-99-008\SPMn-99-016 August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-182 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST RUN SOUTH 89031'34" EAST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN NORTH 00°26'26" EAST 625.11 FEET PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION TO A POINT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 87051'34" EAST 36.09 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING RUN SOUTH 87051134" EAST 668.83 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 45015126" EAST 515.68 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 44042'34" WEST 1314.92 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE P.C. OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 30004'00" AND A RADIUS OF 1294.52 FEET; THENCE RUN IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 678.55 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE P.T. OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 45* 17'26" WEST 100 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00022'26" WEST 540.00 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL LYING IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. (Tax I.D. No.1429-323-0002-000/6). (Location: 2982 Curtis King Boulevard. St. Lucie County International Airport.) B. The approval granted under this Major Adjustment to an Existing Conditional Use approval shall expire on August 17, 2000, unless a building permit is issued or an extension is granted in accordance with Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. C. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on August 17, 1999, shall remain valid for the period of Conditional Use approval. Should the Conditional Use approval granted by this resolution expire or an extension be sought pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. D. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis File No.: BCC-99-008\.SPMn_99-016 August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-182 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 Vice -Chairman John D. Bruhn XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 17`' Day of August 1999. ATTEST: Deputy Clerk hf H: I W PI RESOLUTI.N\FIMSHED.99\FPAIR4.CU\FPAIR4.RES File No.: BCC-99-008\SPMn 99-016 August 17, 1999 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney Resolution 99-182 Page 3 `ge rr✓ —&4m— Z a Qi C v g ! P y VJ 00 O ..G. a U � OO Yo t r f\TV( OD C: ~ U co (� to s e aId iT • ' ` O 4-1 t %S is tM ' to§t d ` r � ♦ \ p P ae 9 ` ARKWA r � Sorki �Ir r� P Q W W Iv f � au ru � C � avow win, ml you kir3*n — am HIMS13M O 4-1_� 3 am W.S 0 U - am i.I 30Nrki c ar are LLJj : OVOW WHYS ki3Or3M cc Lazz W Z i Oki OWIOH W301 S MOM 033RS avow OC OC 1"M ►2•! z W W � M1 K S K L S SE L S 9£ L $� ALNfl00 3390HO33>10 Ft. Pierce Air Center - Hangar 13 �J y Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map revised August 2,1999 wH..w ~ M. bW —& b v +r b ..N &1W a..■. MamWlon Po t* k Y Irol hM - t— r • bg* tbaV ft—" BCC 99-008 Ft. Pierce Air Center - Hangar 13 Lot o-4 �J y Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map revised August 2,1999 G Wt1Y Mly Mlofllrs WMI rtrd. b Pam fr nCRw�Mt �d tl.Ii. ranwen oo..cr.tr na�wd.d br,N . • ro.y �O �� 'k4w *4100 AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1999 7: 00 P.M. Petition of Fort Pierce Air Center (Ernesto Velasco, Agent), for a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport. The proposed Major Adjustment is to construct a 12, 000 square foot hangar (Hangar 13) for the following described property: (Location: 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Lucie County International Airport; Hangar 13) THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testing during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners on August S, 1999. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on August 5, 1999. FILE NO. BCC-99-008 M C ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA AUGUST 17,1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: ' NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Seci6t 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and in accordance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: 1. ANTHONY COSCIA & SONS, L.C:, fora Change In Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hukhin- son Island Residential District) Zoning District For the following described AA pawl of land located on Hutchinson Island In Section 34, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Begin at a point of Intersection of the north line of the south 2577.66 feet of the north 2858.86 feet of said Section 34 and the westerly right-of- way line of SR Al A, thence run South 20 deg 23 min 08 see East along sold westerly right-of-way line a distance of 440.00 het, to a point; thence run North 72 deg 24 min 10 see West a distance of 686.20 het more or less to the easterly mean high water line of the Indian RIM thence northerly along said mean high water line a distance of 215.00 het more or less to sold north line of the south 2577,66 het of the north 2858.66 feat of sold Section 34; thence run North 89 deg 59 min 38 see East along sold previously described north line a distance of 459.00 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning (3:81 AQ (Map 35/34N)Q (OR 1221.1734) (Tax I.D. No. 3534.111.0004.000/8). (Location: West side of South SR A-1-A, directly across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase 2) 2. FORT PIERCE AIR CENTER (Ernesto Velasco, Agent) has applied for a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport. The proposed Major Adjustment Is to construct a 12,000 square foot hangar (Hangar 13) for the following described property: Beginning at the southwest corner of Section 29, Township 34 South, Range 40 East run South 89"31'34" East 30.00 feet to agoint lying on the south line of sold section; thence run North.00'26'26 East 625.11 feet parallel to the west line of sold Section to a point, thence run South 87.51'34" East 36.09 Feet to a point; sold point being the Point of Beginning; from said Point of Beginning run South 87.51'34" East 668.83 feet to a point; thence run North 45-15126" East 515.68 feet to a point; thence run North 44'42'34" West 1314.92 feet to a point, sold point being the P.C. of a curve concave to the west, having a delta angle of 30'04'00" and a radius of 1294.52 fee, thence run in a southerly direction along the arc of sold curve 678.55 feet to a taint, sold point being the P.T. of said curve, thence run South 45"1726 West 100 feet to a point; thence run South 00"22'26" West 540.00 feet to a point, sold point being the Point of Beginning. All lying In Section 29, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. (Tax I.D. No. 1429.323.0002-000/6). (Location: 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Lucie County International Airport, Hangar 13) 3. CROCE GIAMBANCO, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Conn mercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the following described property: Section 6, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, that part of the south 'A of the northwest 1/4 of the northeast 1/4 lying west of U.S. 1 and east of th turnpike Feeder road; begin at the Intersection of the west right-of-way of U.S. 1 and the south line of the south ''A of the northwest 1/4 of th northeast ''/r, thence run west along the south line 220.60 het to the easterly right-of-way of Turnpike Feeder Road; thence northeasterly along the right-of-woy 317.20 Fee, thence turn 90 deg and run South 62 deg 36 min 04 sac East 97.75 feet to. the westerly right-of-way of U.S. 1; thence southerly along the right-of-way 245.90 feet to the Point of Beginning. (OR 1150-614) (Tax I.D. No. 1406-124-0002-000/4). (Location: 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1) 4. MARLENE HADDEN, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family' residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential. home for the following described property: - Section 5, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, Sunrise Park No. 1, Block 5, Lots 13 and 14, less the south 10 feet (0.31 AQ (OR 1219-2657) (Tax I.D. No. 2405-501-0104-000/6). (Location: 3120 Avenue Q) 5. LAKEWOOD PARK AUTOWASH, to approve a 12-month extension for an approved Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval to allow for the development of o Car Wash in CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. Section 12, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, Lakewood Park - Unit 12-A, Block 168, Lots 18 and 19 (Map 13/12S) (OR 1095-2992) (Tax I.D. No. 1301-615-0036-000/6) (Location: West side of Turnpike feedeir Road, approximeely-200 feet south of Winter Garden Parkway) 6. DREIDA MCNAIR, for a Conditional use Permit to allow a family j residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described property - Section 32, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, Sheraton Plaza, Unit Four Replat, Lot 302 (OR 216-1958) (Tax I.D. No. 1432-807-0060-000/5). (Location: 3009 Anderson Drive) 7. PIPPIN TRACTOR, for a Change in Zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/aae) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, General) for the following described property: All that certain tract of parcel of land lying, being and situated in Section 25, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, St. Lunge County, Florida and this, tract being more particularly described -as follows: Commencing at the southwest caner of Section 25, Township 34 South, Range 39 East; thence North 00'06'48" East, along the west line of said Section 25, a distance of 2655.28 feet to a point; thence North 89'43'39" East, a distance of 70.98 feet to a point in the east right-of- way line of Kings Highway; thence North 00'01'15" East, 30.00 feet along the east right-of-way of said Kings Highway, and this Point of Beginning of the herein described trod of land; thence North WWI r East, along the east right-of-way line of said Kings Highway, a distance of 224.85 feet to a point; thence North 89'46'12" East, a distance of 468.36 feet to a point, thence South 00'01'15" West, a distance of 224.54 feet to a point; thence South 89°4339" Wed, a distance of 468.36 het to the Point of Beginning and containing 2.42 cast of land, more or less. (Pat of Tax I.D. No. 1325-233-0000-000/7). (Location- East side of Kings Highway, approximately'h mile north of St. Lucie Boulevard). PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on August 17, 19", beginning at 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Stah"s, ti a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commis- sion with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ PAULA A. LEWIS, CHAIRMAN Pub.: Aug. 5, 1999 -n"l C %cv 5 No. 0105 ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMRS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and In accordance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: 1. ANTHONY COSCIA 8r SONS, L.C., for a Change In Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District for the following described property: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED ON HWCW450N ISLAND IN SECTION 34. TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT A POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORM LINE OF THE SOUTH 2677.66 FEET OF THE NORTH 2858.86 FEET OF SAID SECTION 34 AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SR ALA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 20 DEG 23 MIN 08 SEC EAST ALONG = WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 440.00 FEET, TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 72 DEG 24 MIN 10 SEC WEST A DISTANCE OF 686.20 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE EASTERLY MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF THE INDIAN RIVER -,'THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAD MEAN HIGH WATER LINE A DISTANCE OF 215.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 2577.66 FEET OF THE NORTH 2858.86 FEET OF SAID SECIM 34; THENCE RUN NORTH 89 DEG 59 MIN 38 SEC EAST ALONG SAD PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 459.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (3.81 AC) (MAP 35/34WQ (OR 1221.1734)(TAX I.D. NO. 3534-111-M-010/8). (Location: West side of South SR A 1-& directly across from the Regency Island Durres, Phase 2) 2. FORT PIERCE AIR CENTER (Ernesto Vela = Agent) has applied for a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport. The proposed Major Adjustment Is to construct a 12,000 square toot hangar (Hangar 13) for the following described property: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST RUN SOUTH 89.31'34' EAST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN NORTH 0(.26'26' FAST 625.11 FEET PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION TO A POINT. THENCE RUN SOUTH 87' 51'34' EAST 36.09 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING RUN SOUTH 87. 51'34' EAST 668.83 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 45' 15'26' EAST 515.68 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 44' 42'34' WEST 1314.92 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE P.C. OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 30. 04W AND A RADIUS OF 1294.62 FEET; THENCE RUN IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 678.55 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE P.T. OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 4W 17'26' WEST 100 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00. 22*26" WEST 540.00 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEINGS THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL LYING IN SECTION 29. TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 46 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. am I.D. NO. 1429-323-00024000/6). (Location: 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Lucie County Intetn ation l Airport. Hangar 13) 3. CROCE GUAMBANCO, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I prultutionaq Zoning District for the following described property: SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, THAT PART OF THE SOUTH'/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 LYING WEST OF U.S. 1 AND EAST OF THE TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD; BEGIN AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. 1 AND THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 THENCE RUN WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE 220.60 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY 317.20 FEET; THENCE TURN 90 DEG AND RUN SOUTH 62 DEG 36 MIN 04 SEC EAST 97.75 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY 245.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (OR 1150-614) (TAX I.D. NO. 1406-124-0002-000/4). M (I.ocalton: 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1) 4. MARLENE RIDDEN, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described property: SECTION 5. TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST. SUNRISE PARK NO. 1, BLOCK 5, LOTS 13 AND 14, LESS THE SOUTH 10 FEET (0.31 AC) (OR 1219-2857) (IAX I.D. NO. 2405-501-0104.000/6). (Locallon: 3120 Avenue Q) 5. LAKIEWOOD PARK AUTOWASH, to approve a 12-month extension for an approved Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval to allow for the development of a Car Wash In CN (Commercial. Neighborhood) Zoning District. . SECTION 12. TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST, LAKEWOOD PARK - UNIT 12-A. BLOCK 168. LOTS 18 AND 19 (MAP 13/12S) (OR 1096-29921(TAX I.D. NO. 1301.615-0036400/6). (LocoBon: Wed side of Tumpke Feeder Road. gVm*nately 200 feet south of WWW Garden Parkway) 6. DREIDA MCNAIR, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described property: SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, SHERATON PLAZA, UNIT FOUR REPLAY, LOT 302 (OR 216-1958) (TAX I.D. NO.1432-W7.0060-0=5). (Locaton: 3009 Anderson Dfire) 7. PIPPIN TRACTOR, for a Change in Zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, General) for the following described property: ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF PARCEL OF LAND LYING, BEING AND SITUATED IN SECTION 25. TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA AND THIS TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST YHRLCE NORTH 00 06'48' EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 25, A DLSUNCE OF 2655.28 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE NORTH 89' 43'39' EAST. A DISTANCE OF 70.98 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF KINGS HIGHWAY; THENCE NORM 00' 01 15' FAST, 30.00 FEET ALONG THE EAST RIGHT -OF WAY OF SAD KINGS HIGHWAY, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND, THENCE NORTH 00- 01-15- EAST, ALONG THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAD KINGS HIGHWAY, A DISTANCE OF 224.86 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89' 46'12' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 468.36 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 0(r 01'15' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 224.64 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89' 43'39' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 468.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 2.42 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS (PART OF TAX I.D. NO.1325-233-0000-0OQ/7). (Location: East side of Kings Higtrvray, approximately 1h mile north of St. Lucie Boulevard) PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held In the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the Roger Pottras Administration Annex Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on August 17, 1999, beginning at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105. Florida Statutes, It a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA /S/ PAULA A. LEWIS, CHAIRMAN Publish: August 5, 1999 O et 00 N N N O N } is� h t- � 00 a 00 00 V1 00 {t M M en en Cl) en M M Cl) �� „�ajaaaa�aaaa� �$$ _.� w,wlwwwwwww w w w(w w w w IU¢¢PQUUUUUUU 0 WW0404 � { at wa.a.wwww Ow0 0��000000 U 0wwwwl wwww 0 w him O CD O en en M M N��7/ O Q en N CV N N N W N U I c 00 0 rA cpro 00 0 W O � H N 00 O o ai o, W a � U U U CODzc)w �1.4 tj 41.1Ul'H 0000 C7 �o U ++ C 5 �QQ'QQU ' 0� 0000>4 0a 0W3 wxva3�3�3�0 A ,uP.�xaaaW� .� y��2O O O O D U �U 8a�aa�aaHH U Z a0cn (nv)0Cn U 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 it p O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O y yr N O .r 0 N M O 0 O (D O O 0 O O O a 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 0 Co bC7,1 O� (ON ON O, G� O O O N "NV N � dN' N "Mw M en m 0 MPS FOR E-10 SED IMPERVIOUS �VIOUS IOUs (10,641 S. (14,790 S (25,431 SF) (3,039 SF) 316,749 SF 434,400 SF 751,149 SF 42.169% 57.831 % 100.000% d Z N r` ° r` J W O m �3 aWWJ �� ,� (r L, Ln O = J ~ Q�� o�Dco W � . Lt Z��, �J�Q O W � Z .J Z CO Wu� W _n Y 2 W 2 J g a o J () W in f p T m \ m O z rn W n 3 v�i V mp V a X I V+ O 0 V SHEET NO.: OF 1 jr, 'IWOEM NO. 4B DATE: 08/17/99 CONSENT [ REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg.[ ] Quasi-Jud. [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS i PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Community Deve1 onment Community Development Director SUBJECT: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single-family - 4 du/acre) BACKGROUND- Petition of Marlene Hadden, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District, for property located at 3120 Avenue Q. (File No.: CU-99-004) N/A PREVIOUS ACTION- The Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 with three members absent (Mr. Merritt, Mr. Lounds, Mr. Trias), recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit at its July 15, 1999, meeting. RECOMMENDATION- Approve Draft Resolution 99-150 granting a Conditional Use Permit to operate a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single-family, 4 du/acre) Zoning District for property located at 3120 Avenue Q. COMMISSION ACTION• APPROVED [ [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: ] DENIED Dougl M. Anderson County Administrator Originating Department: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Review and Approvals Management 4 Budget: Purchasing: Other: Other: COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-150 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Community Development Director Date: August 10, 1999 Subject: Petition of Marlene Hadden, for a Conditional Use to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single-family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District. (File No.: CU-99-004) The subject property is located at 3120 Avenue Q, within the RS-4 (Residential, Single-family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District. The purpose of the Conditional Use Permit is to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home. At the July 15, 1999, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 with four members absent (Mr. Merritt, Mr. Lounds, and Mr. Trias), recommended approval of this petition as set forth in Draft Resolution 99-150. This proposed Conditional Use Permit meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends the approval of this petition for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single-family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District for property located at 3120 Avenue Q, as set forth in Draft Resolution 99-150. SUBMITTED: 3oU,_ 6GckjcLV C Julia Shewchuk, AICP Community Development Director cs cc: Marlene Hadden File 0 M 1 2 3 4 s 6 s 9 RESOLUTION 99-150 FILE NO.: CU-99-004 A RESOLUTION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOME WITHIN 1,000 FEET OF ANOTHER SUCH FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOME IN THE RS-4 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY - 4 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Marlene Hadden, presented a petition for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single-family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District for the property described below. 2. On July 15, 1999, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the hereinafter described request for a Conditional Use Permit in RS-4 (Residential, Single-family - 4 du/acre) Zoning for the property described below. 3. On August 17, 1999, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 4. The proposed Conditional Use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and ,policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 5. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic File No.: CU-99-004 August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-150 Page 1 In 1 conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the 2 public health, safety and general welfare. 3 4 6. The proposed project will be serviced by adequate public facilities and 5 services. 6 7 7. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this 8 resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on 9 August 17, 1999. 10 11 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County CommissionersofSt. 12 Lucie County, Florida: 13 14 A. Pursuant to Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development 15 Code, a Conditional Use Permit for Marlene Hadden to allow a family 16 residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home in 17 the RS-4 (Residential, Single-family - 4 du/acre) Zoning is granted for the 18 property described as follows: 19 20 Section 5, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, Sunrise Park No. 1, Block 5, Lots 13 21 and 14, less the south 10 feet. 22 23 (Tax ID No. 2405-501-0104-000/6) 24 25 (Location: 3120 Avenue Q) 26 27 B. The Conditional ;Use Permit approval granted under this Resolution is 28 specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Marlene 29 Hadden, including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary 30 permits and authorizationsfrom the appropriate State and Federal regulatory 31 authorities, including but not limited to; the Department of Children & 32 Families. 33 34 C. The Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, 35 shall remain valid for the period of Conditional Use approval. Should the 36 Conditional Use approval granted by this resolution expire or an extension 37 be sought pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land 38 Development Code, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. 39 40 D. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authorized 41 and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the 42 Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of 43 reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. File No.: CU-99-" August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-150 Page 2 o ff,, ' fte 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 J3 36 ji After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula Lewis XXX Vice -Chairman John D. Bruhn XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Doug Coward xxx Commissioner Cliff Barnes xxx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 17" day of August 1999. ATTEST: DEPUTY CLERK Cs: MWPlConditional UsesWaddenlhaddenres.wpd File No.: CU-99-004 August 17, 1999 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY Resolution 99-150 Page 3 C— -w-- z N 70 L N O N R � CIOi O O C vo Y t•�YC?,p CD e ^1 W p E! CIO M t vp rc p a �cu"" ti'i t0 O r- r - A ~ t•►� W • i p P a D ' fJ' W O C c a a t w � .. 9 S ..._ _. 3 isyr NwYr h 4 O ` r Q 7 AV ffilv w W 17, 3TfjAY NM r. • vai [7 r in Z oY YrNn Q�vOY 117paa 0 u v i avoa 3MI 3'"tl U CC 0 ji OvoY Iv 3 a30v3M cr Z IY �+ Utl M10X 1v301 W ~ 7 W Q a'S ovoY a33Ni Oval No11Yva L='N Yi•3 3111v3 Z W W K d-� ir S ►£ 1 S 5£ 1 S 9£ 1 AiNf100 3380HO33>10 � o, '`/ `400 Zoning Marlene Hadden ► F 2i! 10 g 8i 7 6 5r/ 1019i8 7 6 5 4 32 I w1 9 8 7 6 I I— I 2/ 22 I Marlene Hadden Land Use I I Ii I 2 1I/0 9 / BII 7 6 5 1I 4 II I I E 7 6 5 4 3I 2 1 121 11 10 1I 9 8 7 6 I I I I I— I I I I I III 1II III _2_222l/531I12 / / 1I �II8 /3 —/2!! 13 III 1 II 1I J4 J5 IIIII /6 III 7 II I I1I 18IIII 1I /9IIII I I II1 III II j I II1II IIIIII 1I 16III1 12 /4II II II !9 1 I I I I 20 Avenue "S" r 1 2 10 9 8 7 1 6 5 1 4 3 12 /0L98 6 1 5 4 1 3 2 1/ l2 11 10 9 1 8 7 1 6 Q)IF nl 12113 114 15/6 n1/eI/9 /4 /5 I /6I 7 18 !9 20 2/ 122 I !9 20 � I Avenue "R" 1 7 6 5 4 1 3 2 1 L1011, 8 1 7 61 5 1 41 3 2 110 19 8 17 6 rn N-) 1 12 /5 /6 17 18 1 19 20 2/ 22 516 n 1/9 l Avenue -------- Ft. Pierce City Limits O z44Oz Avenue "P" CO 817 1 6 514 1 3 21 O 1 I I I I z 2/129 1 10 11 1 12 13114 115 1 /6 I I I I I 1 p Avenue ''0 p -------------------- I I U 5 4 3 21I J F , P Community Development CU 99-00" Geographic Information Syste ms Map revised June 18,1999 n+. MW b, bn cwpW aw"W.v -m Wpmp o* Yd& —Y h. b-, Id, b YYm0 nOo6Y, 1.npY-idd 1.1r d I I I %W *40# PUBLIC HEARING - MARLENE HADDEN FILE NO. CU-99-004 Ms. Cyndi Snay presented staff comments. Ms. Snay stated that she was presenting the petition of Marlene Hadden for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District. Ms. Snay stated that Section 3.01.03(J)(6), RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code allows this type of use as a Conditional Use. Ms. Snay stated that there is one facility located approximately 650 feet from the subject property and two additional facilities located within 1,000 feet. Ms. Snay stated that the character of the area in which the subject property is located is primarily residential in nature. The use being proposed is not expected to create any additional demands on public facilities. The applicant has applied for a license to operate an adult living facility with the State of Florida. Ms. Snay stated that staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff is, therefore, recommending that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions for Ms. Snay. Chairman Wesloski asked if the applicant was present and would like to address the Board. Ms. Marlene Hadden, 204 Essex Drive, Fort Pierce, addressed the Board. Ms. Hadden stated that she would like to have six residents. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions for Ms. Hadden. At this time, Chairman Wesloski opened the public portion of the hearing. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone that would like to speak in favor of or in opposition to this petition. Hearing no further arguments in favor of or in opposition to the petition, Chairman Wesloski closed the public portion of the hearing. Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 22 Ms. Dreyer asked Ms. Snay to explain the diagram with the houses and numbers provided in the packet. Ms. Snay stated that the numbers depict the number of family residential homes within 1,000 feet. Chairman Wesloski asked what would be the pleasure of the Board. After considering the testimony presented during the public hearing, including staff comments, and the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, Mr. McCurdy moved that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to the application of Marlene Hadden, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District because it conforms with all applicable codes and regulations. Mr. Grande seconded the motion. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was any discussion. Upon roll call, the motion was approved, 6-0. Chairman Wesloski stated that the petition would be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 23 0 � � � 0 N � I *ftw I _A0 AU G ST. LTICIE cOLrNTY CONDITIONAL -TIRE RESPONSE FORM COMMUNITY VELOP'V,E ST. LUCIE COUNTY FL The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow a Family Residential Home within 1,000 feet of another such Family Residential Home in the RS-4 (Res'den ial. Single Family 4 du/acre] Zoning District. REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 3120 Avenue Q CURRENTLY ZONED: RS-4 (Residential. Single -Family - 4 dujacre) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 13, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) : Cuz C� Address: DATE: / L"I Signed: Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-004 MARLENE HADDEN) VAUG" ' 9 i ST. L.UCIE COUNTY �TJ CONDITIONALURE R SPONSF FORM COMMUNITY DEVELOPI�IENT ST. LUCIE COUNTY F ucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow a Family Residential Home within, 1,000 feet of ano her such Family Reaidential Home in the R -4 (Residential, Single Family 4 du/aerel Zoning Distri nt- _ REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 3120 Ay_niip O CURRENTLY ZONED: RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family 4 du/an re) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: A_119Lst 13, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) : L LJ14 el Vc/r!l �AhfS Address: 3107 VA Fav-� —P( er 6, e F Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-004 MARLENE HADDEN) En �r 19 -W1' . R9 AUG 1 0it f,ML The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow a Family Residential Home within 1,000 feet of another such Family Residential Home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District. REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 3120 Avenue 0 CURRENTLY ZONED: RS-4 (Residential. Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 13, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... Left I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) : C. a g R e * -t—R ee j ! h Address: _� A A 4..11 p Z� ti DATE: Signed: AAA o— Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-004 MARLENE HARDEN) AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1999 6: 00 P.M. Petition of Marlene Hadden, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Family Residential Home within 1, 000 feet of another Family Residential Home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District for the following described property: (Location: 3120 Avenue Q) THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST If it becomes necessary, these public hearings maybe continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners on August S, 1999. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on August S, 1999. FILE NO. CU-99-004 'Eet..J° ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County land Development Code and in accordance with the provisions of the St. Luck County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. hide County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: 1. ANTHONY COSCIA & SONS, L.C., fora Change In Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchin- son Island Residential District) Zoning District for the following described property: A parcel of land located on Hutchinson Island In Section 34, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Begin at a point of intersection of the north line of tfte south 2577.66 feet of the north 2858.86 feet of said Section 34 and the westerly right -of. way line of SR Al A; thence run South 20 deg 23 min 08 sec East along said westerly right-of-way line a distance of 440.00 feet, to a points thence run North 72 deg 24 min 10 sec West a distance of 686.20 feet more or less to the easterly mean high water line of the Indian Rivers thence northerly along said mean high water line a distance of 215.00 feet more or less to said north line of the south 2577.66 feel of the north 2858.86 feet of said Section 34; thence run North 89 deg 59 min 38 sec East along sold previously described north line a distance of 459.00 feeF more or less to the Point of Beginning (3:81 AC) (Map 35/34N)o (OR 1221.1734) (Tax I.D. No. 3534-111-0004.000/8). (Location: West side of South SR A-1-A, directly across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase 2) 2. FORT PIERCE AIR CENTER (Ernesto Velasco, Agent) has applied for a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Luck County International Airport. The proposed Major Adjustment Is to construct a 12,000 square foot hangar (Hangar 13) for the following described Begl�g at the southwest corner of Section 29, Township 34 So^ Range 40 East run South 89'31'34" East 30.00 NO to a. folnt lying on the south line of said sections thence run North.00'26'26 East 625.11 feet parallel to the west line of sold Section to a point, thence run South 87'51'34' East 36.09 feet to a point; Bald point being Inc Point of Beginning; from sold Point of Beginning run South 87'51'34" East 668.83 feet to a point; thence run North 45115'26" East 515.68 feet to a point; thence run North 44'42'34" West 1314.92 feet to a point, said point being the P.C. of a curve concave to the west, having a delta angle of 30'04'00" and a radius of 1294.52 feels thence run In a southerly direction along the arc of sold curve 678.55 feet to a taint, said point being the P.T. of sold curve; thence run South 4511726 West 100 feet to a point, thence run South 00'22'26" West 540.00 feet to a point, sold point being the Point of Beginning. All lying In Section 29, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. (Tax I.D. No. 1429.323.0002-000/6). (Location: 2962 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Lucie County International Airport, Hangar 13) 3. CROCE GIAMBANCO, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Com- mercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the following described property. - Section 6, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, that part of the south 'A all the northwest 'A of the northeast''/4 lying west of U.S. 1 and east of the turnpike feeder road; begin at the intersection of the west right-of-way of U.S. 1 and the south line of the south 'A of the northwest '/4 of the northeast '/4; thence run west along the south line 220.60 feet to the easterly right-of-way of Turnpike Feeder Road; thence northeasterly along the right-of-way 317.20 fee, thence turn 90 deg and run South 62 deg 36 min 04 sec East 97.75 feet to,the westerly right-of-way of U.S. 1; thence southerly along the right-of-way 245.90 feet to the Point of Beginning. (OR 1150.614) (Tax I.D. No. 1406-124-0002.000/4). (Location: 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1) 4. MARLENE HADDEN, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described property: -- - Section 5, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, Sunrise Park No. 1, Block 5, Lots 13 and 14, less the south 10 feet (0.31 AC) (OR 1219-2857) (Tax I.D. No. 2405-501-0104-000/6). (Location: 3120 Avenue O) 5. LAKEWOOD PARK AUTOWASH, to approve a 12-month extension for an approved Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval to allow for the development of a Car Wash in CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. Section 12, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, Lakewood Park - Unit 12-A, Block 168, Lots 18 and 19 (Map 13/12S) (OR 1095-2992) (Tax I.D. No.1301-615-0036-000/6). (location: West side of Turnpike Feeder Road, approximately.200 feet south of Winter Garden Parkway) 6. DREIDA MCNAIR, for a Conditional use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described property: Section 32, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, Sheraton Phu, Unit Four Replat, Lot 302 (OR 216-1956) (Tax I.D. No. 1432-807-0060-000/5). (Location: 3009 Anderson Drive) 7. PIPPIN TRACTOR, for a Change in Zoning from the AR-i (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, General) for the following described property: All that certain trod of parcel of land lying, being and situated in Section 25, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, Florida and this tract being more particularly described as follows - Commencing at the southwest corner of Section 25, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, thence North 00'06'48" East, along the west line of said Section 25, a distance of 2655.28 feet to a point; thence North 89*43*39" East, a distance of 70.98 feet to a point In the east right-of- way line of Kings Highway, thence North 00'01'15" East, 30.00 feet along the east right-of-way of said Kings Highway, and the Point of Beginning of the herein described trod of land; thence North 00'0.1'l5" East, along the east right-of-way line of said Kings Highway, a distance of 224.85 feet to a point; thence North 89'46'12" East, a distance of 468.36 feet to a point; thence South 00'0I'll 5' West, a distance of 224.54 feet to a point; thence South 89*43*39" West, a distance of 468.36 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 2.42 acres of land, more or less. (Part of Tax I.D. No. 1325-2334)000-000/7). (Location: East side of Kings Highway, approxinately'h mile north of St Lucie Boulevard). PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the Roger Poitros Administration Annex Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on August 17, 1999, beginning at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, If a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commis- sion with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he May need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ PAULA A. LEWIS, CHAIRMAN - Pub.: Aug. 5, 1999 No. 0105 . %r LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and in accordance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: 1. ANTHONY COSCIA 8r SONS, L.C., for a Change In Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District for the following described property: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED ON HUTCHINSON ISLAND IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, Sr. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORMA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT A POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 2577.66 FEET OF THE NORTH 2858.86 FEET OF SAiD SECTION 34 AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SR Alk THENCE RUN SOUTH 20 DEG 23 MIN 08 SEC EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 440.00 FEET, TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 72 DEG 24 MIN 10 SEC WEST A DISTANCE OF 686.20 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE EASTERLY MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF THE INDIAN RIVER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE A DISTANCE OF 215.W FEET MORE OR LESS TO SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 2577.66 FEET OF THE NORTH 2858.86 FEET OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE RUN NORTH 89 DEG 59 MIN 38 SEC EAST ALONG SAID PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 459.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (3.81 AC) (MAP 35/34WO (OR 1221-1734)(TAX I.D. NO. 3534-111-0004-00"). (LocatIon: Wed side of South SR A-1-A, dkectly across from the Regency Wand Dunes, Phase 2) 2. FORT PIERCE AIR CENTER (Ernesto Velasco, AgenQ has applied for a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County international Airport. The proposed Major Adjustment is to construct a 12,000 aquae toot hangar (Hangar 13) for the following described property: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST RUN SOUTH 89' 31'34" EAST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN NORTH 00' 2626' EAST 625.11 FEET PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION TO A POINT' THENCE RUN SOUTH 87.51'34' EAST 36.09 FEET TO A POINT: SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING RUN SOUTH 87. 51'34" EAST 668.83 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 45' 15'26" EAST 515.68 FEET TO A POINT: THENCE RUN NORTH 44' 42'34' WEST 1314.92 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE P.C. OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 30' 04W AND A RADIUS OF 1294.52 FEET; THENCE RUN IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 678.55 FEET TO A POINT. SAD POINT BEING THE P.T.- OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 45' 17'26" WEST 100 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00' 22'26' WEST 540.00 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL LYING IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA. (TAX I.D. NO. 1429-323.0002-000/6). (Locatlon: 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Lucie County IMemaitorlal Airport. Hangar'13) 3. CROCE GWNBANCO, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the following described property: SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 FAST, THAT PART OF THE SOUTH'A OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 LYING WEST OF U.S. 1 AND EAST OF THE TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD; BEGIN AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST RIGHT -OF WAY OF U.S. 1 AND THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTH'/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 THENCE RUN WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE 220.60 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY 317.20 FEET: THENCE TURN 90 DEG AND RUN SOUTH 62 DEG 36 MIN 04 SEC EAST 97.75 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. 1: THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY 245.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (OR 1150-614) (TAX I.D. NO. 1406-124-0002.01 0/4). `J (Locaffon: 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1) 4. MARLENE HARDEN, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential tome for the following described property: SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, SUNRISE PARK NO. 1, BLOCK 5, LOTS 13 AND 14. LESS THE SOUTH 10 FEET (0.31 AC) (OR 1219-2857) (TAX I.D. NO. 2405501-01044XXV6). (Locallon: 3120 Avenue q 5. LAKEWOOD PARK AUTOWASH, to approve a 12-month extension for an approved Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval to allow for the development of a Car Wash In CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. . SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. LAKEWOOD PARK - UNT 12-A, BLOCK 168. LOTS 18 AND 19 (MAP 13/12S) (OR 1095-2992) (TAX I.D. NO. 1301.6154 036-00M). (L.ocatlon: Wed side of Trmipike Feeder Road, approximately 20o feet multi of Whter Garden Part way) 6. DREDA MCNAIR, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described. property: SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, SHERATON PLAZA UNIT FOUR REPLAT, LOT 302 (OR 216-196M (TAX I.D. NO. 1432-807-0060-000/5). gDoaiton: 3009 Anderson Drive) 7. PIPPIN TRACTOR, for a Change in Zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, General) for the following described property: ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF PARCEL OF LAND LYING, BEING AND SITUATED IN SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA AND THIS TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 FAST; THENCE NORTH 00 w48- EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 25. A DISTANCE OF 2665.28 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89' 4339' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 70.98 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EAST RIGHT-OFWAY LINE OF KINGS HIGHWAY; THENCE NORM 0(r 01 "15' FAST, 30.W FEET ALONG THE EAST RIGHT -OF WAY OF SAID KINGS HIGHWAY, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND; THENCE NORTH 00' 01'15" EAST, ALONG THE FAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID KINGS HIGHWAY, A DISTANCE OF 224.85. FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89' 46'12- EAST, A DISTANCE OF 468.36 FEET TO A POINT, THENCE SOUTH 0(r 01'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 224.54 FEET TO A POINT. THENCE SOUTH 89' 43'39- WEST. A DISTANCE OF 468.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 2.42 ACRES OF HAND, MORE OR LESS (PART OF TAX I.D. NO. 1325-2334MW-00". (location: Ead dde of Kings Highway, apprordmatey 'A mile north of St. Lucie Boulevar>) PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held In the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the Roger Poitros Administration Annex Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on August 17, 1999, beginning at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105. Florida Statutes, If a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record includes the hest rnony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /St PAULAA. LEWIS, CHAIRMAN Publish: August 5, 1999 0 TO: 19 ,ed DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 07/15/99 File Number CU-99-004 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning and Zoning Commission Planning Manager { Y 9�' July 6, 1999 SUBJECT: Application of Marlene Hadden, for a Conditional Use.Permit to allow a family residential home within 1000 feet of another family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District. LOCATION: 3120 Avenue Q ZONING DESIGNATION: RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) LAND USE DESIGNATION: RU (Residential Urban) PARCEL SIZE: 0.31 acre PROPOSED USE: _ Family residential home located within 1,000 feet of another family residential home. SURROUNDING ZONING: RS-4 (Residential, Single - Family - 4 du/acre) to the north, east, and west and I (Institutional) to the south. SURROUNDING LAND USES: Residential single-family homes and Miracle Prayer Temple RU (Residential Urban) to the north, south, east, and west. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #15 (721 Avenue D) is located approximately 3 miles to the southeast. UTILITY SERVICE: Water and sewer service is provided by Ft. Pierce Utility Authority. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way width for Avenue Q is 70 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity. cm rn July 15, 1999 Petition: Marlene Hadden Page 2 File No.: CU-99-004 STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed conditional use, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed conditional use is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed conditional use is not in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 3.01.03(J)(6), RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District, allows family residential homes that are located within 1,000 feet of another family residential home as conditional uses, subject to approval by the Board of County Commissioners. 2. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would have an adverse impact on nearby properties; The proposed conditional use is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. There are three existing licensed homes located within this neighborhood: 1aar IDSTTan"e s Cerir 2405-601-0086-000/0 Lesane Family Home Day Care 3303 Avenue S 650 feet 2404-608-0097-010/1 Lil Kid's Inc. Learning Center 1501 N. 29" Street 1,000 feet 2404-608-0097-010/1 Hope 1501 N. 29 h Street 1,000 feet These three facilities concentrate on children's day care. The applicant is proposing an adult living facility, which will have a maximum of six clients and two employees. Upon applying for a license to operate the adult living facility, the applicant was apprised of the code requirement for a conditional use when a family residential home is located within 1,000 feet of another family residential home. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including roads, police protection, solid waste disposal, water, sewer, drainage structures, parks, and mass transit; This conditional use is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. The applicant has applied for license to operate an adult living facility in the State of Florida. Upon applying for the license and confirming the appropriate zoning, M July 15, 1999 Page 3 Petition: Marlene Hadden File No.: CU-99-004 it was determined that due to the existence of a family residential home within 1,000 feet of the subject property, a conditional use permit would be required. 4. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed conditional use is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The applicant, Marlene Hadden, has applied for the requested conditional use in order to operate a licensed family residential home within 1,000 feet of another family residential home for property located at 3120 Avenue Q. The subject property is located in the RS-4 (Residential, Single - Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District. Family residential homes are permitted within this zoning district. When there is an existing family residential home located within 1,000 feet of another family residential home a conditional use is required. Family residential day care facilities for children are included for this purpose. The character of the area in which the subject property is located is primarily residential in nature. There are three existing residential day care facilities located within 1000 feet of the proposed facility. Upon applying for a state license and confirming the appropriate zoning for the subject property, it was determined that a conditional use is necessary when another facility is located within 1000 feet of the subject property. Staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. No special conditions have been recommended. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment cs cc: Marlene Hadden File En M 2405-501-0104-000/5 5 1 4 3 51. U�-CL)ZY fo _t4O •L] w w w w - .. - w w 34 !4 54 S• ]0• MC47 1 112 SI !t 76. - si. 3 f0 go 1 w so so la} S4 .tt0 ill w �4 H of N w ato - 54 J�4 j -+s4 w w w w.f a1aMG >. a4 •p ryt, 9 ;i +airy i- is, =54 ie iz0 I w w w w.tF t, Ni N— -I aslal i- I I e` f N 3 f ,y 11 I w o !Y + , ;r ; iG• 9� 1 t �1 6 �7 4 7 !1 !1 !t !1 !tT 51 SI al 'tSi1 e1 ssA sl at at st s at T7w w (' _ _ _ _ _ -_ _1 - - . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ryf 2' �18_�7'_ 1�5_t 41rt' �2 `'1,'JJ w.f fa Iw w 1=0 w w •a • a? rs b y as 5I w td a54 pa 8F:11 - .. • • sari CITY LIMITS ra- - - - - - Q 1as- 34f.1 r yo s bD F 2 Q PARK « (2404.6019-009i0.OW19) J � � ( -0qD/�1 �(2tW-60B-0091-000/61 R R 4 .15 Ac J 4.43 Ac 4-62 AC 1 �« a — t!f aN.7 !p. VI 610 .. 37 I ^I _'3 g; p_3g�3 �"ISHT as 4o w w w ain I.l2, N_ �7113 '�_q wta A � q 170.51 40 �f01 f0 f0 �IP'R� A7.1.9 S T 6 'S- - s�j ff� ff� R�b k b Z � r2+a-6os�3-000io) � 46 • � a 4,62 Ac r0 _ - :: R : — slo 10 aa+ Golfo w w o t o m a � a o s w w w w w fiQ zlzz3 i� p; xI2� 14 `�q o a I +, o '�s,I'a3I _ w s Iw +! a 351' 3I 7 wl f— 3$1��3 t]• of 3 f IN o iA'��p • 317 „ ao Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations J. — RS-4 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY - 4 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for single-family dwellings at a maximum density of four (4) dwelling units per gross acre, together with such other uses as may be necessary for and compatible with low density residential surroundings. The number in "()" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Family day care homes. (9") b. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) notifies the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. Mg) C. Single-family detached dwellings. (m) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking Requirements . Off-street parking requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.06.00. 6. Conditional Uses a. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of another such family residential home. (9w) b. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (m) 7. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00. Adopted August 1. 1990 107 Revised Through04115/99 iII`"``�L2,,' . VQ11 en t- I t- 3 t- Mr eOt�I G� O� VO0�3!eOt M M MfM��-M MIM t- eOi M{M O v01 r ([� eOt� Q�`SV1`7 M•M t- Mj�M�j 'ct t- 'd' v1 O� O� 01 M_i_M [� 3,1 l� [� f �O et �et O� YO� M M l� �t t� M t- .O et�rler d � O� M;M� O tom i r- r- t- r- t- vl�et 7 ��� CN O, 1CON C1 O) M;M MM�Men t- ldam .. d Ote- O�t� .h-. OO� �M _M•� �M�M€M ;�a�aka ..ww•wwwwlwlwwwwwwwwlwww�w€wwwlwwwwwlwwwwlwww aja�ala:,a�a�a a�a�a a�a�a�a a?aaa�a;a;a�a�a;aa�a�a�aia�a�a�aa w I j{kk> W a W'W W W W!WW W W W W W W W W W�W1W W j W(�:W{W W W;W W W WIW W W �! UCg00;0000�0000000U00UC[10000MU0U00pi0 W ¢rxUI0;rxc40r4PU41 C7�.I.W..►�.W..��w.��i�l��i����.W-f.W.���.��IW.w..W.,.W.�k.W.�tw..W.W.'t.W..W.W-t :pGc+:jrxrxa!ao4ac�c�.c4u4C4 11:4:4 wicL!c�r�nw0a:C04 xi'W W.W. Ni NE I a H�F'FHHHHHFFFFHHHHHHHHFIWiHHH1HjHHHHiHFFaF aEa,cs.aaaawaaaaaaaaa,aaa�!a.aaa?aaaalaa.a.�a c�A4c4wan:ac4a4a:wc4aaaaawwaA-rxawa:l040:a:w'c�rs:a w "^ 0000000000000000000000`H'000�0100OOOOo�O kV wUwwwww,wwww�wwwwwwwwwwwtn;wwwlw;www�wwwwa.,w ._. 3 z F € I N O ol Wlfx rsF H'0 g4 H` v°Oz�z�z�0 x a1 x x'r � H zw alx{x �` is 0. x o oix y O0 U W;W W W W'IW M W v� W N h ^" W W W W W W ON W W;W W W WIW W W A W j V CU 0. M ; O, cn vi M ! M �-+ O, M > c v� �i M((i< CO 'o OCl > t- W > > to b w > N > �'!> M ! O, O w O I .-� O O, O N W> O, vi r+ 0 O. O O O O O I O v� I O M v O; %O �O l- �-+ Co o vi N O -+ M o O oo O� R �--'!a 0 M 0 0 't v ") 0� M M N 0 M 0 0; 0 O M o M et M M M N o O l= 0 0 O M -- -' N M MiM M M M M M M~ I { I, ; f a i ( G C� i 0; 1 I k I u I 1 a a, ��] i �• p� I W i j ¢ z I I I U aW1 U s 0 o �x > I�� u¢�'� �aaza�A W 9 ol � p� w °aA.aW¢wuum �3�3�WzvaWw) tn> >H wW A 0>d d Q Igo I ly 18 �O w E U., H !0 a �rZv�OWw w tnO��UW 3zN � W.,F aGA a4cwAO ° � ¢ zOp�o40 •- w ►a v� v�viC v�Z �p�UVuU) U O ° I� j�ON !�4 iZalala�l�mooalcoa100AAAa.�c7C7C7xxx���ti�a4a�aa������ is oo I a xxx S'¢o00 av�-��AAE' ¢dmA¢¢ WW U U 4r O O w+ i N \ 000o OOo�o0oo�oogo09C>I V O� �/1 O •• V)'Y1 \ \ \ \ \ \ \ O'O O O O�O 000o0 M \ O O� \ O �O O \ \ O po 0000.+000 \ O �O O� 00 \ \ \ O O O O, \ O oo�g000�ooOg000�00000 r h �D \ \ \ O O O O \ O 000'O0o .-r O �' \ \ \ O OIO t` \ O to \ O �o M Vl .-r N 00 \ \ \ \ \ \ O O O O O O 000 00000 N �O 00•�O \ \ \ \ O C. O O y a L+ NI O O A O" w O� C, O N o 0 0 0 O O O O O O; O et N O O O, O O M '`O M O N— O O O, w O O 4 4 .--{ t-'d' w o NI o 0 o N M N O 110 't o_ m N O o o as O O N O+ 00 N o 0 o o O ON 0 O �o 0 o et t� N O M �--' e!' a1 .�. w w �_ N 0 00 Co O o O O o t m _ DO N O o o O O O bQ i I O O OO 1,0 �O 11 �O �O �O Y — -> V1 OOO C. Yl . O000OO O �O Ovl O OO v1 Ovi Ov1 000 Oh0vO0h o00000I000000000000100000 0 v v er' v N N N N N NN v N 0 v N t v N N vvav't N N N N NNN vvv N 0,I� N v'tvv N N N N I:t N 0lV1 'avv"rCIS N N N N N N 0 v N N N N i •"" a1 �t h — O� CN i t- V1 7 ' - t Cs G1 ! as ON et et ' v1 N �' -t O� et O� N i vvet;M.o�rvlv�ty'tv00��v,vv M M MI en O M en1en M M M M O M M, cn cn � a w E I a�a,a w w,w F U Ejj a�a�a�.d w w.w a1a�a w ! w3w ti[%axa:a'a Z w�ww�w I AIM U:UUUUUzU'UIU17 x�aafaxxx � xC aw � ��'xxxia3xx:xc�xxlx •• FFF�W FFIFFFF�FUFFiFF', xx;xa Uwww�v�zww;wwwwEwmww,ww� 000EF WWo0i00000a0000 o M O ! 3 !� "O W > i ! i iN j �M Gn o�v�iw�wi�� FaxC40x jCS'C:G' m ' Q °: b W > ¢a0i W N > i� CF/1 NM m 'n X 00Zi.< C7 m MIW X m � > CQ �' W > h W > M W� > i ¢��o¢¢i¢¢ %n W W W > > } > �O ' m W > v1 .r m O p� O ! O N C. ! m O C. cnI O 112 O "p i 12 C. — ! M -+ O M -+ .--� M O O M Cr et t` O O O cn m en M -+ � M Z I I «rye co !N a {z�I ul — u 3 E � co 6 I O � cl ! 00i A CD w?z 0 Ioca �, •,¢a ¢ �!0>0 �C.� xa�i� (> w jA 4° a jaWOwl 3dzWooi cn ,,U ., wg o.,Ua z cno vSvia-a w U a a a O,C.C.C.C:,v�v�v�v�cn olu O : U cn O U O 000+OOOO'OOOOOOOOOO Oiet �i9 O,O N S 0 O 9 0 O�i� 9 9 C 0 0 0 C 0 0 p w 0 { O O OIO � O � O CIO � � O � O O O O O O O O d a i O� t` O O Y1 V1 N \O N_ a� M O O OIO O et N O N \O!00 I-- � i O O N I .--� O O;O N O rG O O -A 00 a O N O O O_ O 00 �O Ok 00 CT N O O N O fL O 1�4 Vl�,C uc� /r IF N N N N N N N!N C N C N C C N N C N CA N m *4w' ITEM NO. 4B 14*41 u U I AUG 13 j099 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT - ST. LUCIF CnfINTv c1 The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow a Family Residential Home within 1,000 feet of another such Fam' X Residential Home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District. REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 1120 Avenue Q CURRENTLY ZONED: RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 13, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I within 500 feet of the prop<pspd Condit�Qnal Use. Name (Please Print): Address: DATE: 0.11. q 1 Signed: am a property owner Please note that forms returned hout a name and ac�cj(ress will not be considered. Also note that re rned forms are a ma ter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-004 MARLENE HADDEN) En { )1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ST. LUCIE COUNTY FL The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow a Family Residential Home within 1,,000 feet of another such Family Residential Home in the RR-4 (Residential, Single Family 4 du/acre) 9.onina District, REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 1120 Avenue O CURRENTLY ZONED: RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only -one of the three following statements and return by: August 13, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... V I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I xAVE N0 OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) : LL 14 � h• d-C-&- Address: " (p- i&fi;e Lynx= T� Qi�w�.����, •�ff�rs� DATE: g / Jj 9 9 Signed: 6/LO-4-A - Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-004 MARLENE HADDEN) `ITEM NO. 4C DATE: 08/17/99 CONSENT [ ] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg.[ ] Quasi-Jud. [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: ( SUBMITTED BY: Community Development `��-)` 10_ -� mil' �- Community Development Director�/,,'/ SUBJECT: Request for a Conditional Use Permit to operate a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single-family - 4 du/acre)Zoning District. BACKGROUND: Petition of Dreida McNair (Debrrah Laguerre, Agent), for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District, for property located at 3009 Anderson Drive. (File No.: CU-99-005) PREVIOUS ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 with three members absent (Mr. Merritt, Mr. Lounds, Mr. Trias), recommended approval of the Conditional Use Permit at its July 15, 1999, meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Draft Resolution 99-186 granting a Conditional Use Permit to operate a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single-family, 4 du/acre) Zoning District for property located at 3009 Anderson Drive. COMMISSION ACTION: APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: "'- Do gl s M. Anderson Coun Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management Budget: Purchasing: Originating Department: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) ,%r rr++ 1. ,1 COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-186 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Community Development Director Date: August 10, 1999 Subject: Petition of Dreida McNair (Debrrah Laguerre, Agent), for a Conditional Use to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single-family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District. (File No.: CU-99-005) The subject property is located at 3009 Anderson Drive, within the RS-4 (Residential, Single- family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District. The purpose of the Conditional Use Permit is to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home. The applicant is proposing to operate a family residential home for the developmentally disabled. There are two existing family residential homes within 1,000 feet of the applicant's property (ALF - 300 feet and Group Home - 829 feet). The closest facility is different from the applicant's due to the use being an adult living facility. At the July 15, 1999, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 with four members absent (Mr. Merritt, Mr. Lounds, and Mr. Trias), recommended approval of this petition as set forth in Draft Resolution 99-186. This proposed Conditional Use Permit meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends the approval of this petition for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single-family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District for property located at 3009 Anderson Drive, as set forth in Draft Resolution 99-186. SUBMITTED: Julia Shewchuk, AICP Community Development Director cs cc: Dreida McNair Debrrah Laguerre, Agent File 1 RESOLUTION 99-189 FILE NO.: CU-99-005 A RESOLUTION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOME WITHIN 1,000 FEET OF ANOTHER SUCH FAMILY RESIDENTIAL HOME IN THE RS-4 (RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY - 4 DU/ACRE) ZONING DISTRICT FOR PROPERTY LOCATED IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Dreida McNair (Debrrah Lag I rr , Agent), presented a petition for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single-family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District for the property described below. 2. On July 15, 1999 the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public; hearing_ on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the hereinafter described request for a Conditional Use Permit in the RS- 4 (Residential, 'Single-family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District for the property described below. 3. On August 17, 1999, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 4. The proposed Conditional Use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. File No.: CU-99-005 August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-186 Page 1 *41W 1 5. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on 2 adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic 3 conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the 4 public health, safety and general welfare. 5 6 6. The proposed project will be serviced by adequate public facilities and 7 services. 8 9 7. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this 10 resolution, was granted by the Community Development Director on 11 August 17, 1999. 12 13 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. 14 Lucie County, Florida: 15 16 A. Pursuant to Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development 17 Code, a Conditional Use Permit for Dreida McNair (Debrrah Laguerre, Agent) 18 to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family 19 residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single-family - 4 du/acre) Zoning 20 District is granted for the property described as follows: 21 22 Section 32, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, Sheraton Plaza, Unit Four Replat, Lot 23 302. 24 25 (Tax ID No. 1432-807-0060-000/5) 26 - 27 (Location: 3009 Anderson Drive) 28 29 B. The Conditional Use Permit approval granted under this Resolution is 30 specifically conditioned on the requirement that the petitioner, Dreida McNair 31 (Debrrah Laguerre, Agent), including any successors in interest, shall obtain 32 all necessary permits and authorizations from the appropriate State and 33 Federal regulatory authorities, including but not limited to; the Department of 34 Children & Families. 35 36 C. The Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to this resolution, 37 shall remain valid for the period of Conditional Use approval. Should the 38 Conditional Use approval granted by this resolution expire or an extension 39 be sought pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land 40 Development Code, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. 41 42 D. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authorized 43 and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the File No.: CU-99-005 August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-186 Page 2 n 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 N 36 4 Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula Lewis XXX Vice -Chairman John D. Bruhn XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 17th day of August 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: DEPUTY CLERK Cs: HAWFConditional UsesVAcNaiMicnair_res.wpd File No.: CU-99-005 August 17, 1999 COUNTY ATTORNEY Resolution 99-186 Page 3 --4m — z coT a z O o� C N w C.)N O U O a�i y 5 T t°�►� A C �f+• M Y ° I L VTI V! .+ y a O 0 4 c a a C� E f �Oeb►� o O - � a a _^, U G i9 La u c W tt �� � yW �•S'1£ N W t _1�tl%ipiM33tl7 1 „ R o yak P Wil lie 9 KISZ !s PARKWAY a ' r Q v a ai W ;b W M ON vei r M a w °w s v urpn Hl"s 0tlr U a s p avow awl 30Nvw U W i v WW3 w3ar3H W Ow 7w010N T110 W �— N Wy y co Ys i$ OM 033NS ovOtl Mlltiv7 dr or Y i1 Q K•3 l3Mil� z r W r W �• �wi 7 polo M M S ►£ 1 S S£ 1 S 9£ 1 KLNf1OO 338OHO33NO ' a� Zoning M Dreida McNair /5 6 /4 7 — — /2 — 9 — I �I I 1 36 I 134 133 l5 6 /4 7 ,3 8 ' 12 I 9 I Bryant 22 Road 321 3/ 1 j 129 128 -- --15 -- -6 -- — — -- --13---8 -- ---- 12 — 9 -- 271 1 2111S 1 24 I23 F.P.F.W.M.D. Canal No. 1 255 254 1253 1252 251 250 249 248 247 246 245 244 243 18/ n8 177 176 17 256 l80 /79 Anderson Drive 257 297 29B 299 300 30/ 303 304 305 306 307 182 l83 212 256 296 211 3/5 3/4 316 3/3 3/2 311 3/0 J09 308 184 2/0 204 203 259 � 295 l85 260 1_. Langston 209 205 C 294 0 C)3A 321 20 -loll , , 293 318 319 320 322 323 324 207 6 za � C /86 qj J 201 292 340 339 33/ 325 �� Drive 262 a) 291 341 U 338 333 330 J87 /88 263 290 342 -p 337 334 326 0) 329 242 189 190 191 l92 264 289 O 343 C 336 335 7E N 327 328 24/ 240 239 2.38 1237 236 235 Q Ln 265 Kingsley Drive 1266 2 I 268 1269 IVO 12271 1272 1273 1274 jV!j I 276 2,M 1 217 1 286 1 285 284 1 283 282 1 28/ 280 1-79 1 278 277 CU 99-005 Juanita Avenue MRNN !So ,sz 146 /47 /48 /49 15/ 145 144 143 142 14/ 1 140 139 Community Development h Geographic Information Systems Map revised June 22,1999 ��~hu��.m�.t.���W -W. N Land Use �6022 23 24 — — 25 — 26 Dreida McNair /5 6 /4 7 l3 �8 — — 'Z — — 9 I I� I I 136 I 134 133 /5 6 /4 7 — 13 8 — /2 I 9 it —� —/0 — I Bryant Road 32 131 1�30 29 1128 271 26 ►�5 124 123 F.P.F. W.M.D. Canal No. 1 --16 t=_ 7 15 I s /4 I 9 _> l3 I l0 — — — 12 221 2/ 20 j /9 j /8 nii 255 254 253 1252 25/ 250 249 1248 247 246 245 244 243 181 l78 177 176 /7 256 180 /79 Anderson Drive 257 297 29B 299 300 30/ 303 304 305 306 307 l82 2/3 2i 258 296 183 21/ 2/2 259 3/5 314 3/6 3/3 3/2 3// 310 309 306 184 210 20q 203 � 295 l85 260 Q 294 Langston 209 205 O U Hall 293 317 3/8 319 320 32/ 322 323 324 208 M ,, 186 207 206 201 261 292 340 339 332 33/ Cij Drive I 262 m 291 341 U 338 333 330 J29 4� 187 /88 263 290 342 -p 337 334 M 329 326 242 /89 /,cb /9/ 192 264 289 343 Q 336 335 E N 328 327 24/ 240 239 238 237 236 235 N 265 Kingsley Drive 2� FW 268 269 270 27/ 1272 IM 274 275 276 288 2bl 286 285 284 1 283 282 1 28/ 12-80 279 278 1 277 CU 99-005 Juanita Avenue /50 /52 146 147 /48 /49 1r,1 145 /44 /43 /42 /4/ 140L Community Development Geographic Information Systems h Map revised June 22,1999 • �P rn map D. been cane, for a —el 0—ft -W W.— pupoea aty. WD4 wW @Who Dean - of 10 provide IM noel coat "' —"ft 7� 7 Ftarniellon VoeeDb. M is Yt riled for — u ■ bg* bk.*Q d.--L 11 \`II %,, *me PUBLIC HEARING - DREIDA MCNAIR FILE NO. CU-99-005 Ms. Cyndi Snay presented staff comments. Ms. Snay stated that she was presenting the petition of Dreida McNair for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District. Ms. Snay stated that Section 3.01.03(J)(6), RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code allows this type of use as a Conditional Use. Ms. Snay stated that there are two facilities located within 1,000 feet of the subject property. One is located 300 feet and the other is located 829 feet. Ms. Snay stated that the character of the area in which the subject property is located is primarily residential in nature. The use being proposed is not expected to create any additional demands on public facilities. The applicant has applied for a license to operate an adult living facility with the State of Florida. Ms. Snay stated that staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff is, therefore, recommending that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions for Ms. Snay. Chairman Wesloski asked if the applicant was present and would like to address the Board. Ms. Debrrah Laguerre, Laguerre & Laguerre Associates, 2268 SE Longhorn Avenue, Port St. Lucie, addressed the Board. Ms. Laguerre stated that she represents Dreida McNair. She stated that Laguerre & Laguerre Associates, A Human Resource Consulting Group, is working to enhance life styles in the community. Ms. Laguerre stated that she would like to make reference to Chapter 419, Community Residential Homes, 1997 Florida Statutes, Section 419.001(2) states "Homes of six or fewer residents which otherwise meet the definition of a community residential home shall be deemed a single-family unit and a non-commercial, residential use for the purpose of local laws and ordinances. Homes of six or fewer residents which otherwise meet the definition of a community residential home shall be allowed in single-family or multi -family zoning without approval by the local government, provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of 1,000 feet." Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 24 Ms. Laguerre stated that they are present tonight because Ms. McNair would like to open a home within 1,000 feet of another such home. Ms. Laguerre stated that she is a community advocate and has a problem with unlicensed facilities. She stated that Ms. McNair currently runs an unlicensed facility with two developmental clients. Where would they be without Ms. Nair? She has accommodated them in her home for the last three years. Ms. Laguerre stated that she would like to recommend that this Board forward a recommendation of approval to allow Ms. McNair to do what she does best, serving the developmental disabled. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions for Ms. Laguerre. At this time, Chairman Wesloski opened the public portion of the hearing. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone that would like to speak in favor of or in opposition to this petition. Ms. Miriam Warren, 602 SE Thanksgiving Avenue, Port St. Lucie, addressed the Board. Ms. Warren stated that Ms. McNair has an extensive background in caring for the elderly, she makes every effort to help anyone that needs help, she is very energetic, and she takes a sincere approach to providing services or finding a source to provide services that her clientele may need as well as her family. Ms. Warren stated that she concurs with a letter written to Ms. McNair by the State stating their frustration that Ms. McNair has not been licensed to provide services. Ms. Warren stated that Ms. McNair has a sincere interest in helping others and it is her hope that this Board would see fit to grant -Ms. McNair the Conditional Use Permit so that she can be licensed with the State. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone else that would like to speak in favor of or in opposition to this petition. Hearing no further arguments in favor of or in opposition to the petition, Chairman Wesloski closed the public portion of the hearing. Chairman Wesloski asked what would be the pleasure of the Board. Mr. Matthes asked Ms. Snay if the petition that was included in the packet is in support of the Family Residential Home. Ms. Snay stated yes. Mr. Matthes asked Ms. Snay if those residents who did not sign the petition were either not contacted or objected. Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 25 M of Ms. Snay stated yes. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any further questions. Chairman Wesloski asked what would be the pleasure of the Board. After considering the testimony presented during the public hearing, including staff comments, and the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, Mr. Moore moved that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to the application of Dreida McNair, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District. Mr. McCurdy seconded the motion. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was any discussion. Upon roll call, the motion was approved, 6-0. Chairman Wesloski stated that the petition would be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 26 E i,? AUG — 9 (. d9 LH 1 ST. L.UCTF COUNTS 'ONDTTTnMAT. TTerr ovannwTow vnnwr COMMUNITY DEVcIO?MENT The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land ar.a located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow a Family Residential Home within 1,000 feet of anothar suh F m,7v Resldential Home in he R -4 (ResiAent-iA7, Single -Family - 4 du/-gcra) Zoning Dis _ri rt _ REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 3009 Anderson Drive CURRENTLY ZONED: RS-4 (Residential, Sing7o g milt' 4 dl/ao,..pl Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 13,? 99 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... . I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): ! A 14 e- Address : J/-airwt DATE: Signed: Plea qeno4 that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-005 DREIDA MCNAIR) AU6 - 9 1999 4 COMMUNITY D �LOPTY.F ENT The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land ar_a located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the -Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow a Family Residential Home within n 1,000 feet of another much F mi ly Residential Home in the RS-4 (Residential- Single -Family 4 du/acre) Zoning District. REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 3009 Anderson Drive CURRENTLY ZONED: RS-4 (Residential. Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: AigLst 13, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) : Address: 4' r DATE: J G Signed:�y Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-005 DREIDA MCNAIR) -40 AUG 1 0 1999 i 1 0 COM!:°t M-If D-vELnottENT ST. LlKiE CQi PgTY FI The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land ar_a located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow a Family Residential Home Within 1,000 feet of another such Family Residential Home in the R -4 (Res; dAn*; rah , Single -Family 4 Wanrp) Inning D sxf-r; �t REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 3009 nd.rGnn nrive CURRENTLY ZONED: RS-4 (Residential, Single Family 4 dulacrel Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 13, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name ( Please Print) : 1 i o r` Address: DATE: �' q , / N e=f Soo r 1�) f e Signed: , Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-005 DREIDA MCNAIR) !p d� 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ST. LUCIE COUIN'v ci The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow a Family Residential Home within 1 000 feet of anothtar such Family Residential Home in the RS-4 (Residential-, Single -Family - 4 du/acral Zoning District - REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 3009 Anderson Drive CURRENTLY ZONED: RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: AiiqLst 13, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE: NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name ( Please Print) : 4in�P� 1 a .G �, M t Address: l 7 4 � Fv r� I e e- � FZI • 3,4- 29A� DATE: f Signed: cP 2rQ, � Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-005 DREIDA MCNAIR) Dreida McNair C"Me 3 009 Anderson Drive Fort Pierce, FL 34946 561-595-3625 May 28, 1999 St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Dear Board Members: Please be advised that I am requesting a conditional use approval to open a community residential home within one thousand (1000) feet of another such home. I am appealing to the Board of County Commissioners to sincerely consider the approval of my application. I have an extensive background in caring for the developmentally challenged, and I have opened my home graciously to them for the the past three years. I can assure you that making a decision in my favor will not place a burden on the community, but infact, will make a great contribution to society. I have gained the support of my community through a petition, and received a letter of support from my colleague who operates the community residential home located at 3001 Anderson Drive. However, these two residential homes located within one thousand feet (1000) of each other will be different types of homes, Ms. Crumbly has an Adult Family Care Home and if given the opportunity, I would have a Developmental Group Home. I have dedicated my life to caring for those less fortunate than myself, I do hope that you will allow me to continue my life's long endeavor by becoming a licensed home. Thanking you in advance for your time and effort. Si erely, , Dreida McNair cc: Laguerre & Laguerre Associates Zoning and Planning Commissions Files Dreida McNair 3009 Anderson Drive Fort Pierce, FL 34946 561-595-3625 May 28, 1999 St. Lucie County Zoning and Planning Commissions 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Dear Members: Please be advised that I am requesting a conditional use approval to open a community residential home within one thousand (1000) feet of another such home. I am appealing to the Zoning and Planning Commissions to sincerely consider the approval of my application. I have an extensive background in caring for the developmentally challenged, and I have opened my home graciously to them for the the past three years. I can assure you that making a decision in my favor will not place a burden on the community, but infact, will make a great contribution to society. I have gained the support of my community through a petition, and received a letter of support from my colleague who operates the community residential home located at 3001 Anderson Drive. However, these two residential homes located within one thousand feet (1000) of each other will be different types of homes, Ms. Crumbly has an Adult Family Care Home and if given the opportunity, I would have a Developmental Group Home. I have dedicated my life to caring for those less fortunate than myself, I do hope that you will allow me to continue my life's long endeavor by becoming a licensed home. Thanking you in advance for your time and effort. Sincere �t z�-' Dreida McNair cc: Laguerre & Laguerre Associates County Board of Commissioners Files LAftERRE & LAGUERRE AS ;Y6CIATES A Human Resource Consulting Group 'Dedicated To Excellence" Dear Community Members, We are presently conducting a petition to license a Developmental Group -Home in your area. However, there is another Residential Home located within a 1000 feet radius of this one. At this time, we would like to know if you are in support of two Community Residential Homes located in the same vicinity. Please project how you feel by signing or rejecting this petition. We appreciate your time and effort in this matter. Thank you for your support. 27.05 Essex Drive 2901 Anderson Drive 2902 Anderson Drive '2903 Anderson Drive 2904 Anderson Drive 2905 Anderson Drive 2906 Anderson Drive 2907 Anderson Drive 2908 Anderson Drive 3001 Anderson Drive 3002 Anderson Drive 3003 Anderson Drive 3004 Anderson Drive 3005 Anderson Drive 3006 Anderson Drive ,3007 Anderson Drive 3008 Anderson Drive 3009 Anderson Drive 3010 Anderson Drive 3101 Anderson Drive 3102 Anderson Drive 3103 Anderson Drive 3104 Anderson Drive 3105 Anderson Drive 3106 Anderson Drive 3107 Anderson Drive 3108 Anderson Drive 3202 Anderson Drive 2708 Bennett Drive Print Name /. IA r i _ 1 Z_ : A r� k • N c- ' 1, �O/Y)q b) \ck-, Sig ature A ' ZU, 2268 SE Longhorn Avenue ' Port St. Lucie, Florida 34952 Telephone (561) 398-0683 Fax (561) 335-3397 MARK W. CLARK, I'.A. / DONALD R. FOUNTAIN, P.A. t DAVID M. GASPARI NANCY LA VISTA JULIE H. 1,I1"1-KY-RUBIN LAKE LYTAL, JR.,RA. LAKE H. LYTAL, III YVETTE TRELLES-MURRAY MICHAEL OVERBECK DAVID C. PRATHER JOSEI'H J. REITER, Y.A. KEVIN C. SMITH WILLIAMS. WILLIAMS, P.A. May 18, 1999 l.YE RHTER, CLARK • Direct Line: 820-2216 Debra Laguerre Post Office Box 9396 Port St. Lucie, FL 34985 RE: Diedria McNair Dear Ms. Laguerre: PARALEGAL STAFF: GEORGE D. GONZALEZ LAWRENCEGORDON BARBARA L. IIOXTER JAMES E. WILLIAMS CHIEF INVESTIGATOR: MARTi KERNER CONSULTING PHYSICIAN: CATI4Y B. THOMSON, M.D. NURSING CONSULTANTS: KATHLEEN R. GEYER, R.N. ROXANN BILUNGSLEA, R.N. I am most happy to provide this letter of recommendation for Diedria McNair as I understand she has applied for Licensing for Home Care for Developmentally Delayed Clients. I have known Diedria McNair subsequent to January 20, 1997. I have known her to be an exceptionally compassionate, loving, godly, Christian woman who is devoted to the best interest of her immediate and extended family. Therefore, I recommend Diedria McNair highly and I would gladly -Kespond to any further inquiries. Ve3sy truly yours, ES E. WILLIAMS alegal/Investigator /crd CC: Diedria McNair w•__.t_i__: a.._ �.. __.__ _ .n.� rn___ . rtc w♦ rn_�t__ �_:_._ _ m_... n_t� n___t, cr oa not •t-..t. /cr..� ccc .nnn In MRS. EDNA MCCANTS 3109 NAVAJO AVENUE FORT PIERCE, FLA. 34946 May 20, 1998 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: I HAVE KNOWN MRS. DERIDE MCNAIR FOR OVER THIRTY EIGHT YEARS. SHE IS THE MOTHER OF TWO WONDERFUL DAUGHTERS AND A DEVOTED WIFE. THROUGHOUT THE YEARS I HAVE KNOWN HER, SHE HAS PROVEN TO BE DEDICATED TO HER FAMILY AND CHURCH. MRS. MCNAIR CARES FOR HER FAMILY WITH THE UTMOST PROFICIENCY. WHATEVER, IT TAKE FOR HER FAMILY TO FUNCTION SHE SEEMS TO ALWAYS PROVIDE. SHE IS THE ONE YOU CAN COUNT ON TO CARE FOR THE SICK OR JUST COUNSEL FAMILY MEMBERS ON PERSONAL ISSUES. IN ADDITION, SHE IS ALWAYS CLEAN AND NEAT IN HER APPEARANCE. I HAVE CONFIDENCE IN SAYING THAT SHE WILL BE AN EXCELLENT PERSON IN WHAT EVER UNDER TAKING. SHE WILL BE A TRUE ASSET AND TEAM PLAYER TO ANY ORGANIZATION SHE BECOME INVOLVED _� l RESPECTFULLY, jhtz yvd&i6p EDNA L. MCCANTS Ms. Iona Crumbley 3001 Anderson Drive Ft. Pierce, Florida 34946 May 18, 1999 To Whom It May Concern: I have known Dreida McNair for 25 years. She has always been honest, kind, and a very concerned individual. She has cared for handicapped persons, opening her home to help. She, herself, is married and has two children of her own. She is an excellent neighbor and is always willing to help when needed. I personally feel that when it comes to caring for the handicapped or infirmed, Dreida is an excellent choice. I would recommend her for any field of her choosing. Sincerely, Iona Crumbley Adult Family Care Center BTP/sed a= 0 u7 CY) cY) d L O L- N U L _N CL IK f-- � Z L A L O Ln L N Q ON 0 0 t`7 SITE PLAN v LAMA&aSoN Oftivw ja Z97 2w 2" 1" 301 Sot 303 304 Sat 94* d07 $ iro 73 M „ 7,s' 2SG .77 � 130.37. 77• 75. 73, ///.ad:, 314` 313 312 3tl 310� w Joe QM5 31G .,� 3rtt 's 7S' .� lt• �o L A 04 Ck S To h' - ct.a 73' ° 317 !� 3 ti� 3 t a 3Nl ° 3to 321 3tt 3t3"4 324 QO' 75' �� tai f AM is..0i 7i 7S' - c� q. �31,rlf.7i'� iee• s• ai � o • � � �s-''' i4 �1', T3/lea! t°•37. y ?!L 4 -531y d5z i 2 n1 � • �3•cl v 33a 333 : ~ 330 �taJyw Z n trst . u!r w w 34Z 33 7 rrlf z N .� � 3ti .334 3t1 Az a „ i . k 9 ; is lie ' '.lfQ �yy eZd! s'' aa.�s , •s.4e � e' a • as a ss • 7J.7a K N4SL�Y .� 39 154v L"is 25t t51 t5o 249 246 247 t<6 245 244� c e LEGAL DESCRIPTION Tax Identification Number.- 1432-807-0060-000/5 Lot 302, Sheraton Plaza, Unit Four, Replat, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 16, page 18 of the Public Records of St, Lucie County, Florida, V AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, AUGUST] 7, 1999 GAlll):�irll Petition of Dreida McNair (Debrrah Laguerre, Agent), for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Family Residential Home within 1, 000 feet of another Family Residential Home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District for the following described property: (Location: 3009 Anderson Drive) THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testing during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners on August 5, 1999. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on August 5, 1999. FILE NO. CU-99-005 *Nwe En ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given In accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and In accardance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows- 1. ANTHONY COSCIA 6 SONS, L.C., fora Change In Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchin- son Island Residential District) Zoning District for the following described property; A prcof land located on Hutchinson Island In Section 34, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucle County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Begin at a point of intersection of the north line of the south 2577.66 fee' of the north 2858.86 feet of sold Section 34 and the westerly right-of- way line of SR Al A; thence run South 20 deg 23 min 08 sec East along said westerly right-of-way lira a distance of 440.00 feet, to a point; thence run North 72 deg 24 min 10 sec West a distance of 686.20 feet) more or less to the easterly mean high water line of the Indian River;' thence northerly along sold mean high water line a distance of 215.00 feet more or less to sold north line of the south 2577.66 feet of the north 2858.86 feat of said Section 34, thence run North 89 deg 59 min 38 sac East along said previously described north line a distance of 459.00 fort more or less to the Point of Beginning (3:81 AC) (Map 35/34N1n (OR 1221.1734) (Tax I.D. No. 3534.111.0004-000/6). (Location: West side of South SR A-1-A, directly across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase 2) 2. FORT PIERCE AIR CENTER (Ernesto Velosco, Agent) has applied for a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucia County International Airport. The proposed Major Adjustment Is to construct a 12,000 square foot hangar (Hangar 13) for the following described property: Beginning at the southwest comer of Section 29, Township 34 South, Range 40 East run South 89031'34" East 30.00 feet to a.point lying on the south line of said section; thence run North.00'26'26' East 625.11 feet parallel to the west line of sold Section to a point, thence run South 87.51'34" East 36.09 feet to a point; sold point being the Point of Beginning; from sold Point of Beginning run South 87'51'34" East 668.83 feet to a point, thence run North 45°1526" East 515.68 feet to a point; thence run North 44°42'34" West 1314.92 feet to a point, said point being the P.C. of a curve concave to the west, having a delta angle of 30°04'00" and a radius of 1294.52 feet; thence run In a southerly direction along the arc of said curve 678.55 feet to a taint, sold point being the P.T. of said curve; thence run South 45117126 West 100 feet to a point, thence run South 00'22'26" West 540.00 feet to a point, sold point being the Point of Beginning. All lying In Section 29, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucia County, Florida. (Tax I.D. No. 1429-323-0002-000/6). (Location: 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Lucie County International Airport, Hangar 13) 3. CROCE GIAMBANCO, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Com- mercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the following described property: Section 6, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, that part of the south 'A of the northwest''/1 of the northeast''/4 lying west of U.S. 1 and east of thr turnpike feeder road; begin at the Intersection of the west right-of-way of U.S. 1 and the south line of the south 'fe of the northwest '/4 of thr northeast '/4; thence run west along the south line 220.60 feet to the easterly right-of-way of Turnpike Feeder Road; thence northeasterly along the right-of-way 317.20 feet, thence turn 90 deg and run South 62 deg 36 min 04 sac East 97.75 feet to.the westerly right-of-way of U.S. 1; thence southerly along the right-of-way 245.90 feet to the Point of Beginning. (OR 1150-614) (Tax I.D. No. 1406-124-0002-000/4). (Location: 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1) 4. MARLENE HADDEN, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described property: -__ - Section 5, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, Sunrise Park No. 1, Block 5, Lots 13 and 14, less the south 10 feet (0.31 AC) (OR 1219-2857) (Tax I.D. No. 2405-50 1 -0 104-000/6). (Location: 3120 Avenue Q) 5. LAKEWOOD PARK AUTOWASH, to approve a 12-month extension for an approved Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval to allow for the development of a Car Wash in CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. Section 12, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, Lakewood Park - Unit 12-A, Block 168, Lots 18 and 19 (Map 13/12S) (OR 1095-2992) (Tax I.D. No. 1301-615-0036-000/6). (Location: West side of Turnpike Fe", Road, approximately2200 feet south of Winter Garden Parkway) i 6. DREIDA MCNAIR, for a Conditional use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described property: Section 32, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, Sheraton Plaza, Unit Four Replat, Lot 302 (OR 216-1958) (Tax I.D. No. 1432-807-0060-000/51. (Location: 3009 Anderson Drive) 7. PIPPIN TRACTOR, for a Change in Zoning from the ARA (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/aae) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, General) for the following described property: All that certain tract of parcel of land lying, being and situated In Section 25, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, Florida and this' tract being more particularly described -as follows: - Commencing at the southwest corner of Section 25, Township 34 South, Range 39 East; thence North 00°06'48" East, along the west line of said Section 25, a distance of 2655.28 fed to a point; thence North 89.43'39" East, a distance of 70.98 feet to a point in the east right-of- way line of Kings Highway; thence North 00°01'15" East, 30.00 feet along the east right=of-way of said Kings Highway, and the Point of Beginning of the herein described tract of land; thence North 00"Ol'l5" East, along the east right-of-way line of said Kings Highway, a distance of 224.85 feet to a point; thence North 89.46'12" East, a distance of 468.36 feet to a point, thence South 00'Ol'15" West, a distance of 224.54 feet to a point, thence South 89143'39" West, a distance of 468.36 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 2.42 acres of land, more or less. (Part of Tax I.D. No.1325-233-0(100-M/7). (Location: East side of Kings Highway, approximately 1h mile north of St. Ludo Boulevard). PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the Roger Poitros Administration Annex Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on August 17, 1999, beginning at 6-00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, If a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commis- sion with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD Of COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ PAULA A. LEWIS, CHAIRMAN - Pub.: Aug. 5, 1999 I < A"") 5 No. 0105 ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1999 TO WHOM iT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE Is hereby given in accordance with Section 1 1.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and in accordance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: 1. ANTHONY COSCIA & SONS, L.C., for a Change in Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District for the following described property: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED ON HUTCHINSON ISLAND IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT A POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 2577.66 FEET OF THE NORTH 2858.86 FEET OF SAID SECTION 34 AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OFWAY LINE OF SR AiN THENCE RUN SOUTH 20 DEG 23 MIN 08 SEC EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 440.00 FEET, TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 72 DEG 24 MIN 10 SEC WEST A DISTANCE OF 686.20 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE EASTERLY MEIN NIGH WATER LINE OF THE INDIAN RIVER, THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE A DISTANCE OF 215.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 2577.66 FEET OF THE NORTH 2858.86 FEET OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE E RUN NORTH 89 DEG 59 MIN 38 SEC EAST ALONG SAID PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 459.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (3.81 AC) (MAP 35/34MQ (OR 1221-1734)(TAX I.D. NO. 3534-111-0004.00"). aDcatlon: West side of South SR A-1-& dlrecity across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase 2) 2. FORT PIERCE AR CENTER (Emedo Velosco, Agent) has applied for a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport, The proposed Major Adjustment is to construct a 12,000 square foot hangar (Hangar 13) for the following described property: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST RUN SOUTH 89.31'34' EAST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN NORTH 00' 2626' EAST 625.11 FEET PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION TO A POINT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 87' 51'34' EAST 36.09 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING RUN SOUTH 87' 51'34' EAST 668.83 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 45.15'26' EAST 515.68 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 44' 42'34' WEST 1314.92 FEET TO A PONT, SAID POINT BEING THE P.C. OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF Wr 04W AND A RADIUS OF 1294.52 FEET; THENCE RUN IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 678.55 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE P.T. OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 45' 17'26' WEST 100 FEET TO A POINT', THENCE RUN SOUTH 00' 22'2W WEST 540.00 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL LYING IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. (TAX LD. NO. 1429-323-00024M6). (Location: 2982 Curtis King Boutevard, St. Lucie County WoMG loral Akpat, Hangar 13) - 3. CROCE GUIMBANCO, for a Change In Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the following described property: SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, THAT PART OF THE SOUTH'/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 LYING WEST OF U.S. 1 AND EAST OF THE TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD; BEGIN AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. 1 AND THE SOUTH LiNE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 114 THENCE RUN WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE 220.60 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY 317.20 FEET; THENCE TURN 90 DEG AND RUN SOUTH 62 DEG 36 MIN 04 SEC EAST 97.75 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY 245.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (OR 1150-614) (TAX I.D. NO. 1406-124-0002-00014). LWA (Location: 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1) 4. MARLENE HARDEN, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described property: SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, SUNRISE PARK NO. i, BLOCK 5, LOTS 13 AND 14, LESS THE SOUTH 10 FEET (0.31 AC) (OR 1219-2857) (TAX I.D. NO. 2405-Ml -010440)0/6). (Loc iflon: 3120 Avenue Q) 5. LAKEWOOD PARK AUTOWASH, to approve a 12-month extension for an approved Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval to allow for the development of a Car Wash in CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. . SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, LAKEWOOD PARK - UNIT 12-A4 BLOCK 168, LOTS 18 AND 19 (NIAP 13/12S) (OR 1095-2992) (TAX I.D. NO. 1301-615-0036-000/6). (Location: West side of Tumplke Feeder Road, approximately 200 feet south of Winter Garden Parkway) 6. DREIDA MCNAIR, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described property: SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, SHERATON PLAZA` UNIT FOUR REPLAT, LOT 302 (OR 216-1968) (TAX I.D. NO. 1432-W7.0060-MO). (Locatlon: 3009 Anderson Drive) 7. PIPPIN TRACTOR, for a Change In Zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, General) for the following described property: ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF PARCEL OF LAND LYING, BEING AND SITUATED IN SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 FAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA AND THIS TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 24, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 FAST; THENCE NORTH 00 06'48' EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 25, A DISTANCE OF 2655.28 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89' 43'39' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 70.98 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF KINGS HIGHWAY. THENCE NORTH 00' 01*15' EAST, 30.00 FEET ALONG THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID KINGS HIGHWAY. AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND; THENCE NORTH 00' 011 W EAST, ALONG THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID KINGS HIGHWAY. A DISTANCE OF 224.86 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89' 46'12' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 468.36 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 00' 01'15- WEST, A DISTANCE OF 224.54 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89' 43'39' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 466.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONUIINING 2.42 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS (PART OF TAX I.D. NO. 1325-233-0000-0OW7). (Locallon: East side of Kings Highway, approximately 'A mile north of St. Lucie Boulevard) PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on August 17, 1999, beginning at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, I a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS St. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ PAULA A LEWIS, CHAIRMAN Publish: August 5, 1999 i on M TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 07/15/99 File Number CU-99-005 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning and Zoning Commission Ll Planning Manager .6 N July 6, 1999 SUBJECT: Application of Dreida McNair (Debrrah Laguerre, Agent) for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another family residential home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District. LOCATION: ZONING DESIGNATION: LAND USE DESIGNATION: PARCEL SIZE: PROPOSED USE: SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USES: FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: UTILITY SERVICE: TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: SCHEDULED 3009 Anderson Drive RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) RU (Residential Urban) 0.16 acre Family residential home located within 1,000 feet of another family residential home. RS-4 (Residential, Single - Family - 4 du/acre) to the north, south, east, and west. Residential single-family homes RU (Residential Urban) to the north, south, east, and west. Station # 4 (2850 Aviation Way) is located approximately 1.5 miles to the north. Water and sewer service is provided by Ft. Pierce Utility Authority. The existing right-of-way width for Anderson Drive is 60 feet and the existing right-of-way width for Juanita Avenue is 80 feet. M E5 July 15, 1999 Page 2 IMPROVEMENTS: TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: None Certificate of Capacity. Petition: Dreida McNair File No.: CU-99-005 STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed conditional use, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed conditional use is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed conditional use is not in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 3.01.03(J)(6), RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District, allows family residential homes that are located within 1,000 feet of an existing family residential home as a conditional use, subject to the approval of the Board of County Commissioners. 2. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would have an adverse impact on nearby properties; The proposed conditional use is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. There are two existing licensed homes located within this neighborhood: Taz ID # ener` �Nnide Centeriddress 1432-807-0064-000/3 Crumbleys Adult Family Care 3001 Anderson Drive 300 feet 1432-807-0048-000/5 Johnson's Group Home 2604 Bennet Drive 829 feet These two facilities concentrate on adult care. The applicant is proposing a residential home for the developmentally disabled. At this time, the applicant is operating an unlicensed facility on the subject property. Upon applying for a license to operate the group facility, the applicant was apprised of the code requirement for a conditional use when a family residential home is located within 1,000 feet of an existing family residential home. There have been no complaints to date with regards to the existing facility. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including roads, police protection, solid waste disposal, water, sewer, drainage structures, parks, and mass transit; This conditional use is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. The property is currently being utilized for a family residential home. NW En July 15, 1999 Petition: Dreida McNair Page 3 File No.: CU-99-005 The use of the property will not change. The applicant is attempting to become a licensed facility. Upon applying for the license and confirming the appropriate zoning, it was determined that due to the existence of a family residential home within 1,000 feet of the subject property, a conditional use permit would be required. 4. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed conditional use is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The applicant, Dreida McNair, has applied for the requested conditional use in order to allow a family residential home for the developmentally disabled within 1,000 feet of another family residential home for property located at 3001 Anderson Drive. The subject property is located in the RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District. Family residential homes are permitted within the zoning district. When there is an existing family residential home located within 1,000 feet of another family residential home a conditional use is required. The character of the area in which the subject property is located is primarily residential in nature. There are two existing residential family homes located within 1,000 feet of the proposed facility. The applicant operates an unlicenced family residential home on the subject property. Upon applying for a State license and confirming the appropriate zoning for the subject property, it was determined that a conditional use is necessary when another facility is located within 1,000 feet of the subject property. Staff finds that this petition meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. No special conditions have been recommended. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment cs cc: Dreida McNair File m m 432-807-0060-000/5 Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations J. RS-4 RESIDENTIAL, SINGLE-FAMILY - 4 - Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for single-family dwellings at a maximum density of four (4) dwelling units per gross acre, together with such other uses as may be necessary for and compatible with low density residential surroundings. The number in "()" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Family day care homes. (9N) b. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) notifies the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. (m) C. Single-family detached dwellings. (ss9) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking Requirements Off-street parking requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.06.00. 6. Conditional Uses a. Family residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of another such family residential home. (9w) b. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (9w) 7. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00. Adopted August 1, 1990 107 Revised Through04/15199 %cq %%,t �o %D 'o �'o %%0 %o %0 %0 � �o %0 I'D 1�0 %o 1-0* w 'd* 1-t qn "- 't It 'r 1-41 -It ", I-d* -1- 1"" 'T a,, C% 00 m a% ON CD ON ON ON as a% 011 m 0% CN m r ON c\ ON CN m a, 7 5, 'ON .,t "1. 1 t 4r 1 -1- N -I- I", --t cn 'T V* q* I cn en cn cn cn en M cn en en en en en m en cn A m m et et M;m .. ....... . all ;4 ;4 w wIV. V. 41 Ulu Im UUU wiwul� u KU U U �Uu U Ulu U Id 'Mu"M 1:4 194 0 g 0 � 04 C4 C4 1:4 94 1:4 04 1:4 1:4 1:4 11:4 9 e. 94 94 04 04 W I;'! N V� V� r w w w , �1- M FJ W- M — w w FFF FiFFFF�FFFFFF FFFF P' (P.,' C4 CIO 0 0 0 0 0 010 0 0 0 00 0 CIO 0 0 CIO 0001000000 9 OiO 0 0 > IF CA U z U Z�' 0 m z z 0. U 0 U U 0' w 1,t o 0 xix w 0 ow) Oo zo 0 IM W,w Im a¢aoaaja4 "a kn C14 t1- 00 M W) "r 1 tn "D W1 CD t- r- 0 0 S(o o! C'1' (s en 00 -tr 00 "t M oho "o , , , " —I— . . C:> ;� (=>!(D 0 — c� C> c) C c� (D (DicD -,r CD CD 0 CD C) In � (D c, (Z> i r- �r ell a� �o "D "o 1�0 CD "D t- 0 0 t- 5 1�0 a, i;� c,4 (D �o 0 �o %0' �o %0 a� 0 c) C14 cq en N It " C4: N C4 CN cn en eq I I I I lm;" to CNI eq cq C,4 m N m 0. m A, cq cq C14 CIS z w cn 00 U old 0 z 0 vi w :C;d � 0 > 0 < lz U en 00 C5 8 C', W, W, 08 ;-:5 0 8 CD C) CD C) C> Co 0 0 0 C) 0 0 0 0 00 C� (D (� CD C� 0 <D C) . ........... 9199999999999999 a, t- 6 kn ;4 N w 110 m a\ w Oo w 0 r- a-, (5� 00 0 Co C> r- tn 1-t ON 0 (80 C1 C> 0 0 8 C) Q (o C) CD'Q a 0 8 40 C) C> C) C> CD 0 c� c� C) c� CD C) C, 0 o(o Co C) Q Q c) C, C? 1:? 9 9 9 9 9 1D. ID Q C, Q 1= t-L r-, t- r- t- t- r-, r� t�- ' c) (D CD 0 b 0 o (D b 0 c, co 0 OP OP OP V� o? o? o? o? OP C? o? 00 00 00 = OP o? OF o? T o? OP o? OP OF o? o? OP OP N N N w CNI N CNI N N N " A A A z c� , (, , , N N N N N N " " en m en N m en m cn rn en en en cn cn m C', P, m m m m m m m m Ic �:a.a a aia a a a a;a a a a a s aia:a�a a s a a aIa'a 4. a°aia a afa,a a �iw wlw�wiw;w w�w,w;w w w�w w w w,w,w w w,w w,w Li. w1w wlw w w;w�ww,w wow wow w w w;w wow}[w;w�w�w+w wiw,w�w�w�w w:w w U i U U U U U; U U U: U U U U U U U U` U U U U U i U U U U y U U U I U U U Q�. Q lu �i �it�r ?�i �i�PG Psi-L�. �. FLiCl..PC LLB �. P4!Cl. PG U P� u pC,li A U P w;wwwlu�u�wwwwwww,www�wjwwwEwwwww�wwwwwwwiw+ww a s€a. a s a, a;a4a w,aia a aia:a a s aka a a. a a a aia a s FF F FFIF F F F F F FiFF F FlF;F F F{FF F FF'F F F,F!F F F FiF F x:x�x x�xx xx�x�a x xsx,x�x x�xix x x x�x x x xfx x x xix x x x;x x 0000010000000000o0!oo0lo0000i000ol000000 v.;w w wlw�w w wlwiw w w�w,w w w,w,w w ww,w w wlwiw w w wsw w w w;w w > fs: (�.V��" z'U >".,A'A�A� CG W zU A ,, § z A .zj z z z zi z z z FiA z >IU.A z � F ziz ` jZ IU A ;OO OO�OOO�# OO¢'OOOOQO' OOP �U O10(594' �n; �v�v� v�Fq�E-+v�rnQiFFF�l�rn !E-+FFA�AA v�v� qv� c�v� 04w'F,v�v�v�W W c� A�wWA�wC7Www~c7c7c7>zwAO�ZC�7C7ww0CQwiA�WAA z�wgZAz��!00AZZA��'w'zwzd�¢v!nnrz�gz'v z w is¢�Ad}}j�}}jZ¢';v�¢aw�v�¢d.,:aaaUcaQpin aaww¢a¢iz¢'cnw¢1 m zi Nib �t � [�;[�jiO V1 MjV1 �O EO M N O, 00+�0 DD fir N M �+jl� M C) M M O Cv 00 "d O'O O O O;OI�--+ O�O�O O O O�OO O O O O o0i0'O O O O;O O -��O+O O O Or00 �O !f Ol� N O, 00 , O �--+ O O , t- .-• ••• r �p I l� �-+ O [� : �O �O T ] O �D l� O N (- �EM4N N M:M N M N Ni— Ic, N, 'M M rn M;N f+1 e(•!N'N M M N!N en NON M •--+ N N d z xw¢ t � � i u¢x zaa, j wUC) QZAC7Q ��; �n. > pax A U (Wr7 v� pG >. CGI AW'zi z �W a'w C7c7i c7 a0�9 y�0 11a oa U uI Irz�O a a 1a%4 w z= z O' O >vw¢ Iu9wzx �t C7x U 44 p as aWW z 6w vFi 'aaA�}~ wow ~¢W °�Qw [z �IE�• pC z z O z'I� US V)i04 w�wOOWIOo��a� U-yo►y�a,ca�� oO f >-oolz� P4 LGaQp�i fn 7 V] ° w V1�H f¢" L� t��>0 3 MiOiM Ol:g g g CA N 00 eh �elg M (� O l� O\ l�ih N DD O le 00 Ni Oj�O 00 M V1id' t- o O O O�O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O;O O O O O O OIO�O O O OHO O O1O O O OIO O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O'O O O O O O (D co 0 0 0 Oj0 O O;O O O O!O O O 010 O O O O O O CO O O O O,O O O O O O O O;O 00 l- M O,,. �O O [� Y1 �_ N t� Y1 w O\ 4 ^� 00 V1 N �+ M O M V1! M N N O j V'1 O 00 V1 O V1 0\ O Y1 00 \O O Y1 �O t- t- O\ to ao �.-, t- oo %ri O oo \O'�O 01 vi �Di00 v1 O�O O O O O O O O�O O O OIO O O O O 0 0 0 0 O O O O O OIO O O OlO O O O O O �ote-nj9C4?99cn9m9I99en �OO O O O OHO O O OO O O OiR O O Oi0 OcdC'I i + i + o r o r CD o n o C y r n 0 0 n 0 r n CD 0 CO 0 0 n 0 C> 0 CD(D o' t` t` 0 C) 0 o A O�O O O O{O O O Oi0 O O O�O O O O O O O O.O O O O O O O O.O O O OEO O I�1 00 00 00 00 00 iiiiii 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 � 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ! 00 00 00 00 ; 00 00 q i l i iS en N N N N N N NjN N N N!N N N N N N N fV N N (V NON N N N3N N N N N N MiM M M A A M M A A M M AlA M M M M M M M1M M M M M M M M'M M M MiM M 'ct' �'.�-. et i d' d' 'V' .t � i et a.� d' V' E €� I a 00 0, ON ON O, O� en en Cf) en MGM M M M M M Ej ��w�w�wEw�w w w�w�w�w ji € I , ti�� ice. U;w w"w;w,w wjx�ww ]UUUU;UUUiUU ,`s W W W(WW'W WW�W � �F!F F F�FF F O FEF 101010 0,0 E a€w w ww€w w w;w con C-4 �CG;Q z, Ez z" k iz (V Ewiw a=0 ¢ .¢ 0 0 0, "O MI M v� �Diw c CO�CGE�o •/p� o00oo02Oi0'o i E W} ' s i eq W Cd co W 4° C i TillU: cn e w� cn cn zsA� aolw 0'� •• ? 0 Ol wC> UU A i F,� �a vi F U_;I .:I v)o5a Cd z3(�33313333 O U " t-AD 00 �D O% O U ��������� e. o:0000�ooCD w O O€OOOI0,00000 �••� O E O O O O O O O O O i O € , D I�rrnooC4Ih y o000CD0000`0 � 00000�0000�0 bA o�C)CDCoCC)rCD 0000l00000 � b A oo i o0 00 00 00 00 00 0o ao 00 MR N:t cn, M M J ITEM NO. 4C ST . LUCIE COUNTY Ll�� ' AUG , CONDITIONAL. USA RESPONSE FORM IL rt- The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow a Family Residential Home within 1,000 feet of another such Family_ Residential Home in the RS-4 (Residential- Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District. REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 1009 Anderson Drive CURRENTLY ZONED: RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 dulacre) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check -only one of the three following statements and return by: August 13 ,1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional U Name (Please Print): Address: DATE: L? % _ ZZ Signed I am a property owner 'A'tX-11) -4— Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-005 DREIDA MCNAIR) En lU1 U ' I COMMUMTY DEgELOPRIENT ST. L0C!E CoW4IY FL The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow —A Family Residential Home within 1,000 feet of another such Family Rp,saiaential Home in the RR-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoning District - REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 3009 Anderson Drive_ CURRENTLY ZONED: RS-4 (Residential Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one -of the three following statements and return by: August 13, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print):_ Address: DATE: l Signed: %qIV U • �41tJ Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-005 DREIDA MCNAIR) ITEM N0. 4C a AUG i 2;�ag S't' LIIC I E COUNTY � � CONDITIONAL TIRE RESPONSE FORM J:_dc L•.,_, iO�P:;t�l The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow -a Family Residential Home within 1,000 feet of another such Family uaQ. n+-ial Home in the RS-4 (Residential. Single -Family - 4 du/acre) 7nning District. REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 3009 Andprson Drive CURRENTLY ZONED: RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check"only.one of the three following statements and return by: August,13,? 9 9 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use ✓, Name (Please Print) : Address: j DATE: �"� / —" Signed: `;`�t4') Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-005 DREIDA MCNAIR) M 0 ID AUG 3 COMMUP!iTY DEVELOPMENT ST. Lt CIE "^tiJ! ly fL The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow a 'Family Residential Home within 1,000 feet of another such Family Res�den ial Home in the RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre) Zoninc7 District. REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: 3009 Anderson Drive CURRENTLY ZONED: Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one -of the three following statements and return by: August , 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print):_ Mart-4 Address: -� l �L_ n.tr-5 1 1' DATE: Signed: Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-005 DREIDA MCNAIR) lwCM NO. 4D DATE: 08/17/99 CONSENT [ REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg.[ ] Quasi-Jud. [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (fPRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Community nevel o= ment Community Development Director SUBJECT • Request for Rezoning of Property located on the west side of South SR A-1-A, across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase II, from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District)Zoning District - Draft Resolution 99-149 BACKGROUND* Petition of Anthony Coscia & Sons, L.C., for a Change in Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District. The stated purpose of the rezoning is to allow the subject property to be developed for a residential subdivision. (File No.: RZ-99-018) PREVTOUS ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 with 3 members absent (Mr. Merritt, Mr. Lounds, and Mr. Ramon Trias), recommended approval of the rezoning at its July 15, 1999, meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Draft Resolution 99-149 changing the zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District for property located on the west side of South SR A-1-A, across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase II. COMMISSION ACTION: APPROVED [ ] [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: DENIED Originating Department: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Management 6 Budget: Other: 4s M. Anderson y Administrator Purchasing: Other: COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-149 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Community Development Director Date: August 11, 1999 Subject: Petition of Anthony Cosica & Sons, L.C., for a Change in Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District. (File No.: RZ-99-018) The proposed rezoning of property, located on the west side of South SR A-1-A, across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase II, from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District is to allow for the development of the subject property as a residential subdivision. At the July 15, 1999, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 with three members absent, recommended approval of this petition. This proposed rezoning meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends the approval of this petition for a change in zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District as set forth in Draft Resolution 99-149. SUBMITTED: Julia Shewchuk, AICP Community Development Director hf cc: Anthony Coscia Roy Whitehead File M 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 RESOLUTION 99-149 FII.E NO.: RZ-99-018 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE CN (COMMERCIAL, NEIGHBORHOOD) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE HIRD (HUTCHINSON ISLAND RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT) ZONING DISTRICT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Anthony Coscia & Sons, L.C. presented a petition for a change in zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District for the property described below. 2. On July 15, 1999, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the hereafter described request for a change in zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the BIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District for the property described below. 3. On August 17, 1999, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 4. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the existing and proposed use of property in the surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. The proposed change in the Zoning District Classification for that property described as follows: File No.: RZ-99-018 August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-149 Page 1 `WOO A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED ON HUTCHINSON ISLAND IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT A POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 2577.66 FEET OF THE NORTH 2858.86 FEET OF SAID SECTION 34 AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SR AIA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 20 DEG 23 MIN 08 SEC EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 440.00 FEET, TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 72 DEG 24 MIN 10 SEC WEST A DISTANCE OF 686.20 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE EASTERLY MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF THE INDIAN RIVER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE A DISTANCE OF 215.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 2577.66 FEET OF THE NORTH 2858.86 FEET OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE RUN NORTH 89 DEG 59 MIN 38 SEC EAST ALONG SAID PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 459.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (3.81 AC) (Tax ID#: 3534-111-0004-000/8). (Location: West side of South SR A-1-A, across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase H) owned by Anthony Coscia & Sons, L.C., is hereby changed from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District. B. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the change to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis XXX Vice -Chairman John D. Bruhn XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 17'h Day of August 1999. File No.: RZ-99-018 August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-149 Page 2 "%fin' 14 r ATTEST: Deputy Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: hf H:\WP\RESOLUTI.N\FINISHED.99\Coscia.RZ\CosciaRES.wpd File No.: RZ-99-018 August 17, 1999 County Attorney Resolution 99-149 Page 3 C/) Now, 0 —646-- z W V(J OZ5 M u1.J r 0. or: m W O to N W O Y a J E e ' /� vT, L CO o p N Fid U E C �oeFl�N o V ti o \ � o° t v Q .� O IAl ►. W t 6F• W P p a 10 t O f O a ¢ 9 S is KISZ au Mwa„ is � PARK A iS GM 4 w W Q N Y A Somm !tr W � W Mat K O Oa v!! OC z Ovoa tivp11 OWN MLINSN30WV 0 U Z Ovoa Msb 0 Y Oroa AWL Ovoa 3MIt 3"V U jovoa tvMvo a3ar3M cc V W oa ' MH w3a W 40 Y avoa 033Ms aroa Molwv3 a: � ' g O K•3 tvMvi z MI p S /£ 1 S S£ 1 S 9£ 1 $ J.LNf100 3390HO33AO $� o, *ftol Anthony Coscia & RZ 99-018 Sons, L.C. Community Development 4 Geographic Information Systems o Map revised June 21,1999 TM mw h.. e.r ..ice- a0ra W.— wwr. -W v a" ~. e.r m.a. n Pvne....nw a. — .mur. N *40e Anthony RZ 99-018 Coscia & Sons, L.C. Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map revised June 21,1999 p Tn w., a mow'° b O" O" v W-ft wry ~hr O n b Pow YM mO�laln,� W �ON�Y Vft—O n p.WW.RY MNwW d for— Y • W9* hMp EOmmwt in V PUBLIC HEARING - ANTHONY COSCIA & SONS, L.C. FILE NO. RZ-99-018 Mr. Hank Flores presented staff comments. Mr. Flores stated that he was presenting the petition of Anthony Coscia & Sons, L.C. for a Change in Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District for 3.81 acres of property located on the west side of South State Road A-1-A, directly across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase II. Mr. Flores stated that the applicant is proposing that the subject property will complete the development of the Island Dunes Community with a residential subdivision. Mr. Flores stated that the surrounding zoning to the subject property is HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) to the east. CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) to the south. CG (Commercial, General) to the northwest. Mr. Flores stated that staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms with the standards of review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff is, therefore, recommending that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions for Mr. Flores. Chairman Wesloski asked if the applicant was present and would like to address the Board. Mr. Harold Melville, 2940 South 25d' Street, Fort Pierce, addressed the Board. Mr. Melville stated that he represents Anthony Coscia & Sons, L.C. As stated by staff, this is a petition to rezone approximately 3.81 acres from CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) to BUM (Hutchinson Island Residential District). This is the last parcel of the Ocean Dunes complex. To the south of this parcel is the Island Dunes Country Club. Across the street is the Regency Island Dunes, Phase H. Mr. Melville stated that the subject parcel was zoned CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) back in the 1980's with the original concept to have limited commercial in connection with the overall Island Dunes project. He stated that there has not been a market demand for limited commercial in the area, and with low residency in the summer, a small business just could not survive. Mr. Melville stated that the Board was provided in their packets a letter of support from the President of Island Dunes Country Club. As set forth in this letter, the Island Dunes Country Club's membership is comprised of all the residents of the Island Dunes Community, and it's Board of Directors are appointed representatives of each of the Condominium Associations in Island Dunes. As a result, they feel they are fairly representative of the Community as a whole and they are Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 15 *400e *so expressing no objection to this rezoning. Mr. Melville stated that this will unify the area as a strictly residential area with the Country Club as part of the larger residential complex. He stated that HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) is to the north and east, the Country Club is to the south, and this would be consistent with that. Mr. Melville stated that staff is recommending approval, and he urged the Board to recommend approval to the Board of County Commissioners. He stated that he would be happy to answer any questions. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions for Mr. Melville. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Melville if there is a plan for this parcel. Mr. Melville stated that they are working on a single-family residential subdivision site plan at this time. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Melville if the RU (Residential Urban) Future Land Use is satisfactory for the plans. Mr. Melville stated yes. Ms. Dreyer asked Mr. Melville how many residential units would be permitted on this parcel. Mr. Melville stated that he believes five per acre, for approximately 15 units. At this time, Chairman Wesloski opened the public portion of the hearing. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone that would like to speak in favor of or in opposition to this petition. Mr. Charles Lippincott, 8605 South Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, addressed the Board. Mr. Lippincott stated that he owns the property immediately to the north of the subject project. He stated that in general he supports conversion to residential. They do have reservations and worries about density and character of the development, not described here tonight. Mr. Lippincott stated that they do not believe that the river shoreline is long enough to support docks and boat access for more than three homes, not fifteen. They do believe that the tree canopy must be preserved. There is a substantial open area in the middle of the subject parcel which is suitable for development. Along the northern edge of the riverfront there are mangroves. Along the eastern two thirds of the northern boundary line are a fine collection of mature trees. Sabal palms, forty years in age, typically twelve inches in diameter. Ficus trees, including one that is fifty inches in diameter. Wild Coffee. Seagrapes, one multi-trunked version with individual trunks of ten inches, Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 16 *Awe *400 five or six trunks clustered together. Gumbo -Limbo, numerous ranging from sixteen to thirty-five inches in diameter. These must be preserved and we must look to this government to secure that for US. Chairman Wesloski asked Mr. Flores if the applicant will be required to prepare a tree inventory. Mr. Flores stated that the petition before the Board tonight is to determine if HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) is compatible and to determine if the petition meets the standards of review. He stated that the applicant provided a tree survey, the staff Environmental Planner has been on -site, and has looked over the plan in an attempt to avoid the areas where the more significant vegetation exists. Chairman Wesloski stated to Mr. Lippincott that some of his concerns are being addressed. Mr. Lippincott asked Mr. Flores when more information would be available regarding these issues. Mr. Flores stated that staff has not received a formal site plan submittal. Chairman Wesloski stated to Mr. Lippincott that there are rules in place that prevent clean clearing. Mr. Lippincott stated that he just wants to be on record. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Lippincott to clarify that he is not against the residential nature of the project or the project itself, that he would like to see the developer abide by all of the preservation, ecological, and environmental rules that would be imposed on him, and that he is not objecting to the development at the stated density. Mr. Lippincott stated that they would not be happy with the density stated tonight. They believe three or four homes are appropriate, fifteen is totally inappropriate. They are happy with moving from commercial to residential. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone that would like to speak in favor of or in opposition to this petition. Chairman Wesloski asked Mr. Melville if he would like to speak again. Mr. Melville stated that this is a very valuable piece of property and the issues raised by Mr. Lippincott are important to the applicant. Keeping the property looking nice is extremely important to having a high sales value and they will continue to work with staff on these issues. He stated that the issue is CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) versus BIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District), not the site plan of the property. He believes there will be less environmental damage with HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) than you would have with CN (Commercial, Neighborhood). Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 17 Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone that would like to speak in favor of or in opposition to this petition. Hearing no further arguments in favor of or in opposition to the petition, Chairman Wesloski closed the public portion of the hearing. Chairman Wesloski asked what would be the pleasure of the Board After considering the testimony presented during the public hearing, including staff comments, and the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, Mr. Matthes moved that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to the application of Anthony Coscia & Sons, L.C., for a Change in Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District because it conforms with the standards of review and it also gives a down -zoning to the property which he believes is in the best interest of the Island. Mr. Moore seconded the motion, and upon roll call the motion was approved 6-0. Chairman Wesloski stated that the petition would be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 18 In ISLAND DUNES COUNTRY CLUB June 29, 1999 Ms. Diane Wesloski, Chairperson St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Board 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Subject: Rezoning Application Island Dunes Commercial Site Tax I.D. 3534-111-0004-000/8 Dear Ms. Wesloski: It is our understanding that a petition has been filed requesting that the subject property be rezoned to allow development of residential single family lots. The Island Dunes Country Club's property directly abuts the subject property to the south. The Club's membership is comprised of all the residents of the Island Dunes community, and it's Board of Directors are appointed representatives of each of the condominium associations in Island Dunes. As a result, we feel we fairly represent the Island Dunes community. It is the opinion of the Board of Directors of the Island Dunes Country Club, Inc., that the rezoning of the subject property for single family use is reasonable. This is the last undeveloped property within Island Dunes, and will complete the development of the project. We do not oppose the rezoning petition. Please feel free to contact us if we can be of further service. Sincerely, rank Recupido, esident FR/kdm CC: Mr. Anthony Coscia Mr. Roy Whitehead 8735 S. Ocean Drive • Jensen Beach, FL 34957 • 561 / 229-0803 0 Fax 561 / 229-2087 *41o+► AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1999 6: 00 P.M. Petition ofAnthony Coscia & Sons, L.C. (Harold Melville, Agent), for a Change in Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District for the following described property: (Location: West side of South SR A -I A, directly across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase 2) THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners on August S, 1999. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on August S, 1999. FILE NO. RZ-99-018 M M ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: ' NOTICE Is hereby given in accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and In accordance with the provisions of the St. Lucia County Camprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: 1. ANTHONY COSCIA & SONS, LC:, fora Change In Zoning from tlse CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchin. son Island Residential District) Zoning District for the following described property' A parcel of land located on Hutchinson Island In Section 34, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucia County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Begin of a point of intersection of the north line of the south 2577.66 feet of the north 2858.86 foot of said Section 34 and the westerly right -of way line of SR AiA; thence run South 20 deg 23 min 08 sec East along'. sold westerly right-of-way line a distance of 440.00 feet, to a point;l thence run North 72 dog 24 min 10 sac West a distance of 686.20 feet more or less to the easterly mean high water line of the Indian River; thence northerly along sold mean high water line a distance of 215.00 feet more or less to said north line of the south 2577.66 feet of the north 2858.86 feet of said Section 34, thence run North 89 deg 59 min 38 sac East along said previously described north line a distance of 459.00 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning (181 AC) (Map 35/34NX) (OR 1221.1734) (Tax I.D. No. 3534.111-0004.000/8). (Location: Wait side of South SR A-1-A, directly across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase 2) 2. FORT PIERCE AIR CENTER (Ernesto Velasco, Agent) has applied for a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport. The proposed Major Adjustment Is to canstrud a 12,000 square foot hangar (Hangar 13) for the following described property: Beginning at the southwest comer of Section 29, Township 34 South, Range 40 East run South 89'31'34" East 30.00 feet to a.polnt lying on the south line of said section; thence run North.00'26'26' East 625.11 het parallel to the wait line of sold Section to a point, thence run South, 87051'34" East 36.09 fee to a point; sold point being the Point of Beginning; from sold Point of Beginning run South 87'51'34" Eastl, 668.83 fee to a pole, thence run North 45*15'26" East 515.68 fee to a point; thence run North 44142'34" West 1314.92 fee to a pole, said pole being the P.C. of a curve concave to the wait, having a delta angle of 30"04'00" and a radius of 1294.52 faah, thence run In a southerly direction along the arc of sold curve 678.55 fee to a point, sold pole being the P.T. of said curve; thence run South 45*1726 West 100 fee to a point; thence run South 00"22'26" Wait 540.00 fee to a point, said point being the Point of Beginning. All lying In Section 29, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lute County, Florida. (Tax 1.0. No. 1429.323-M2-000/6). (Location: 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Lucie County International Airport, Hangar 13) 3. CROCE GIAMBANCO, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Com- mercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning Distrid for the following described property: Section 6, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, that part of the south 'A of the northwest''/4 of the northeast'h lying west of U.S. 1 and east of thv turnpike feeder road, begin at the intersection of the west right-of-way of U.S. 1 and the south line of the south 'h of the northwest '/4 of tFo northeast '/4, thence run west along the south line 220.60 fee to the easterly rightof-way of Turnpike Feeder Road; thence northeasterly along the right-of-way 317.20 fee; thence turn 90 deg and run South 62 deg 36 min 04 sac East 97.75 fee to.the westerly rightof-way of U.S. 1; thence southerly along the right-of-way 245.90 fee to the Point of Beginning. (OR 1150-614) (Tax I.D. No. 1406-124-0002.000/4). (Location: 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1) 4. MARLENE HADDEN, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described property: ----- Section 5, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, Sunrise Park No. 1, Block 5, Loh 13 and 14, less the south 10 feet (0.31 AC) (OR 1219-2857) (Tax I.D. No. 2405-501-0104-000/6). (Location: 3120 Avenue O) 5. LAKEWOOD PARK AUTOWASH, to approve a 12-month extension for an approved Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval to allow for the development of a Car Wash In CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. Section 12, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, Lakewood Park -Unit 12-A Block 168, lots 18 and 19 (Map 13/12S) (OR 1095-2992) (Tax J.D. No. 1301.615-0036-000/6). (Location: West side of Turnpike feeder Road, approximafely,200 feet south of Winter Garden Parkway) i 6. DREIDA MCNAIR, for a Conditional use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described property: Section 32, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, Sheraton Plaza, Unit Four Replat, Lot 302 (OR 216-1958) (Tax I.D. No. 1432-807-0060-000/51. (Location: 3009 Anderson Drive) 7. PIPPIN TRACTOR, for a Change in Zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, General) for the following described property: All that certain tract of parcel of land lying, being and situated in Section 25, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, Florida and this - trod being more particularly described'as follows: Commencing at the southwest comer of Section 25, Township 34 South, Range 39 East; thence North 00*06'48" East, along the west line of said Section 25, a distance of 2655.28 feet to a point; thence North 89"43'39" East, a distance of 70.98 feet to a point in the east right-of- way line of Kings Highway; thence North 00*0VI5" East, 30.00 feet along the east right-of-way of said Kings Highway, and the Point of Beginning of the herein described tract of land; thence North 00*W'l5" East, along the east right-of-way line of said Kings Highway, a distance of 224.85 feet to a point; thence North 89*46'12" East, a distance of 468.36 feet to a point; thence South 00'O1'15" West, a distance of 224.54 feet to a point; flimme South 89°43'39" West, a distance of 468.36 fee to the Point of Beginning and containing 2.42 acres of land, more or less. (Part of Tax I.D. No. 1325-233-0000-000/7). (location: East side of Kings Highway, approximately 'A mile north of St. Jude Boulevard). PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on August 17, 1999, beginning at 6-00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, B a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commis- sion with resped to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ PAULA A. LEWIS, CHAIRMAN -- Pub.: Aug. 5, 1999 T�1 C 'L"J S No. 0105 ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section 1 1.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and In accordance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: 1. ANTHONY COSCIA & SONS, L.C., for a Change in Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District for the following described property: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED ON H UTCHINSON ISLAND IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, Sr. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT A POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 2577.66 FEET OF THE NORTH 2858.86 FEET OF SAID SECTION 34 AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SR AIA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 20 DEG 23 MIN 08 SEC EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 440.00 FEET, TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 72 DEG 24 MIN 10 SEC WEST A DISTANCE OF 686.20 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE EASTERLY MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF THE INDIAN RIVER: THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE A DISTANCE OF 215.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 2577.66 FEET OF THE NORTH 2858.86 FEET OF SAID SECTION 34, THENCE RUN NORTH 89 DEG 59 MIN 38 SEC EAST ALONG SAID PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 459.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (3.81 AC) (MAP 34134MQ (OR 1221-1734)(IAX I.D. NO. 3534-111.0004-000/8). (Location: West skis of South SR A -I -A, directly across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase 2) 2. FORT PIERCE AR CENTER (Ernesto Velasco, Agent) has applied for a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County international Alrport. The proposed Major Adjustment is to construct a 12,000 square foot hangar (Hangar 13) for the following described property: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST RUN SOUTH 89' 31'34" EAST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN NORTH 00' 26'26" EAST 625.11 FEET PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION TO A POINT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 87.51'34" EAST 36.09 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING RUN SOUTH 87' 51'34" EAST 668.83 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 45' 15'26" EAST 515.68 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 44° 4234' WEST 1314.92 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE P.C. OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 30' 04W AND A RADIUS OF 1294.52 FEET; THENCE RUN IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 678.65 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE P.T. OF SAID CURVE, THENCE RUN SOUTH 45' 17'26' WEST 100 FEET TO A PONT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00' 221W WEST 540.00 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL LYING IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORA. (FAX I.D. NO. 1429-323-O=4 00/6). (Location: 2982 Curls King Boulevard, St. Lucie County International Akporh Hangar 13) 3. CROCE GUIMBANCO, for a Change In Zoning from the CG (Commercial. General) Zoning District to the 1 (Insltutional) Zoning District for the following described property: SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, THAT PART OF THE SOUTH '/. OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 LYING WEST OF U.S. 1 AND FAST OF THE TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD; BEGIN AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. 1 AND THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 THENCE RUN WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE 220.60 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY 317.20 FEET; THENCE TURN 90 DEG AND RUN SOUTH 62 DEG 36 MIN 04 SEC FAST 97.75 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY 245.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (OR 1150-614) (TAX I.D. NO. 1406-124-0002-000/4). M (Location: 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1) 4. MARLENE HADDEN, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described property: SECTION 5, TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, SUNRISE PARK NO. 1, BLOCK 5, LOTS 13 AND 14. LESS THE SOUTH 10 FEET (0.31 AC) (OR 1219-2857) (TAX I.D. NO. 2405-Ml-0104-00016). (Luca flon: 3120 Avenue 0) 5. LAKEWOOD PARK AUTOWASH, to approve a 12-month extension for an approved Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval to allow for the development of a Car Wash in CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. . SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, LAKEWOOD PARK - UNIT 12-A, BLOCK 168, LOTS 18 AND 19 (MAP 13/12S) (OR 1095-2992) (TAX I.D. NO. 1301-6154036-OOW6). (Location: West side of Tumpke Feeder Road, approximately 200 feet south of WRtter Gorden Parkway) 6. DREIDA MCNAIR, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described proper)y: SECTION 32. TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, "RATON PLAZA, UNIT FOUR REPLAT, LOT 302 (OR 216-1958) (TAX I.D. NO. 1432-807-0060-WWS). (Luca llon: 3009 Anderson Drive) 7. PIPPIN TRACTOR, for a Change in Zoning from the ARA (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ocre) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, General) for the following described property: ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF PARCEL OF LAND LYING, BEING AND SITUATED IN SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, Sr. LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA AND THIS TRACT BEING MORE PARTKAXARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 44 SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST; THENCE NORTH 00 W48' EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 25, A DISWICE OF 2655.28 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89. 43'39" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 70.98 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF KINGS HIG MIAY, THENCE NORTH 00' 01'15' EAST, 30.00 FEET ALONG THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID KINGS HIGHWAY, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND. THENCE NORTH OW 011 W EAST. ALONG THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID KINGS HIGHWAY, A DISTANCE OF 224.86 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89' 4612" EAST, A DISTANCE OF 468.36 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 00' 01'15' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 224.64 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH 89' 43'39' WEST. A DISTANCE OF 468.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 2.42 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS (PART OF TAX I.D. NO. 1325-233-0000.00". (location: East side of Kings Highway, approximately 'A mile north of St. Lucie Boulevard) PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the County Commisslon Chambers, 3rd floor of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on August 17, 1999, beginning at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, If a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /St PAULA A LEWIS, CHAIRMAN Publish: August 5, 1999 Cvt�-F- On M TO: FROM: DATE: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 07/15/99 File Number RZ-99-018 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning and Zoning Commission Planning Manager sl�l July 7, 1999 SUBJECT: Application of Anthony Coscia & Sons, L.C., for a Change in Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District. LOCATION: The West side of South A-1-A, directly across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase II. EXISTING ZONING: CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) PROPOSED ZONING: HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) FUTURE LAND USE: RU (Residential Urban) PARCEL SIZE: 3.81 acres PROPOSED USE: The applicant proposes that the subject property will complete the development of the Island Dunes Community with a residential subdivision. PERMITTED USES: Attachment "A" - Section 3.01.03(AA) HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) - contains the designated uses which are permitted by right, permitted as an accessory use, or permitted through the conditional use process. Any use designated as a "Conditional Use" is required to undergo further review and approvals. Any use not found within the zoning district regulations are designated as prohibited uses for that district NW rn July 15, 1999 Page 2 SURROUNDING ZONING: Petition: Anthony Coscia and Sons File No.: RZ-99-018 HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) to the north and east. CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) and HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) to the south. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The existing land uses surrounding the property are RU (Residential Urban) to the north. RM (Residential Medium) to the east and RU (Residential Urban) and RC (Residential Conservation) to the south. The surrounding area consists of high-rise condominiums. Regency Island Dunes are located to the east of the subject property. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is R/U (Residential Urban). FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #8 (7358 South A-1-A), is located approximately 1.5 miles north of the subject property. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property is serviced by St. Lucie County for seviter and Fort Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) for water. TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: The existing right-of-way width for South A-1-A is 100 feet. SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: None. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Concurrency Deferral Affidavit. in July 15, 1999 Petition: Anthony Coscia and Sons Page 3 File No.: RZ-99-018 STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed zoning district is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and has specifically met the requirements of Section 11.06.03. 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The proposed change in zoning is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) zoning district is compatible with the RU (Residential Urban) Future Land Use. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The proposed zoning is consistent with existing and proposed land uses in the area. The general zoning of the immediate surrounding area of the subject property is HIRD. The surrounding area contains primarily residential and accessory uses. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; Conditions have not changed so as to require an amendment. M En July 15, 1999 Page 4 Petition: Anthony Coscia and Sons File No.: RZ-99-018 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; The intended use for this rezoning is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. Prior to the approval of any proposed development, the applicant will need to provide documentation verifying that sufficient facilities are in place to support the development. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The applicant will be required to comply with all federal, state, and local environmental regulations. The site is currently vacant. 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; An orderly and logical development pattern will occur with this change in zoning. The surrounding parcels of property in the area are generally designated for residential uses. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. En CM July 15, 1999 Page 5 Petition: Anthony Coscia and Sons File No.: RZ-99-018 The petitioner, Anthony Coscia and Sons, L.C., has requested this change in zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District in order to develop a residential subdivision. Attached is a copy of Section 3.01.03(AA), of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, which delineates the permitted, accessory, and conditional uses allowed in the Institutional Zoning District. If the change in zoning request is approved, the applicant, by right, would be allowed to establish any of the uses under the Permitted Uses section. Any use under the Accessory Uses section would be allowed only if one or more of the permitted uses exists on the subject property. Any use under the Conditional Uses section could only be allowed if it first receives approval through the Board of County Commissioners. Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms with the standards of review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment ct cc: File Anthony Coscia Roy Whitehead �✓ nri Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations AA. HIRD HUTCHINSON ISLAND RESIDENTIAL DISTRICT 1. Purpose The purpose of the Hutchinson Island Residential District (HIRD) is to provide a residential environment on North and South Hutchinson Island that is respectful of the natural resources and value of the barrier islands and can be supported by available public and private services. HIRD is intended to ensure that the intensity, location, and timing of new residential growth and development is of a character that can be served by adequate public and private facilities, and that protects, preserves and enhances the public health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County. Hutchinson Island constitutes a unique and valuable public resource that plays a vital role in defining the County's economic and geographic character. HIRD is intended to facilitate growth and development of the barrier islands while conserving the natural and human values the islands represent. Given the environmentally sensitive nature of barrier islands. HIRD is designed to ensure that growth and development is clustered away from environmentally sensitive lands and is limited to the more tolerant upland portions of Hutchinson Island. HIRD is also intended to implement and be consistent with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 2. Intent of Application a. It is the intent of the Board of County Commissioners that HIRD shall apply to all multi -family residential property in the unincorporated areas of North and South Hutchinson Island. b. No application for an amendment to this code, shall be accepted which proposes to change the zoning classification of any land on North or South Hutchinson Island to a classification other than to: Hutchinson Island Residential District (HIRD); Planned Unit Development (PUD); Planned Non -Residential Development (PNRD); Planned Mixed Use Development (PMUD); Utilities (U); Institutional (1); Religious Facilities (RF); any Residential, Estate (RE-1 or RE-2) or any Residential, Single Family (RS-2, RS-3, RS-4) zoning district. Any residential development on North or South Hutchinson Island must be consistent with Paragraphs 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 of this Section. -- 3. Subdistricts For the purposes of this District, lands located on North and South Hutchinson Island are hereby classified into the following subdistricts: a. North Hutchinson Island Residential District (NHIRD), which includes those lands located on North Hutchinson Island in St. Lucie County; b. South Hutchinson Island Residential District, North (SHIRD-N), which includes those lands located on South Hutchinson Island between the Florida Power & Light Company nuclear power plant and the city limits of the City of Fort Pierce; and C. South Hutchinson Island Residential District, South (SHIRD-S), which includes those lands located on South Hutchinson Island between the Florida Power & Light Company nuclear power plant and Martin County. 4. Environmental Zones For the purposes of this District, all lands located on North and South Hutchinson Island are classified into one of the following environmental zones based on their geologic, hydrologic, topographic, and biologic character: Adopted August 1. 1990 137 Revised Through 04/15/99 *411✓' *410 Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations a. Dune Preservation Zone, which includes those lands lying between the mean high water line to the east and the western edge of the primary dune system, as defined by vegetation and elevation. The Dune Preservation Zone shall have the characteristics of the Beach and Dunelands environmental zone as described in Chapter VIII, Natural Environmental Analysis, of the St. Lucie County Barrier Island Study: Analysis of Growth Management Policy Plan (August,1982). Where the western edge of the primary dune system cannot be ascertained, the Dune Preservation Zone shall be set by reference to a management/ restoration plan that has been prepared based on natural coastal dynamics. b. Uplands, which include those lands lying west of the western edge of the primary dune system and which are not classified as wetlands as defined in paragraph (c) of this subsection. C. Wetlands, which include those lands lying west of the western edge of the primary dune system that are above the elevation of mean high water and are included in the landward extent of waters of the state as defined in Rule 17-4.02(17), Florida Administrative Code, on the date of adoption of this Code. 5. Permitted Uses The following uses shall be permitted as of right in environmental zones in the Hutchinson Island Residential District: a. Dune Preservation Zone: (1) Residential densities that can be clustered to Uplands located on the parcel proposed for development. (2) Elevated walkways. (3) Recreational uses not involving structures other than elevated walkways. b. Uplands: (1) Detached single family dwelling units. (2) Two and three family dwelling units. (3) Multiple family dwelling units. (4) Parks. (5) Accessory uses, subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00. C. Wetlands: (1) Residential densities that can be clustered to Uplands located on the parcel proposed for development. (2) Elevated walkways. (3) Bridges and bridge approaches. (4) For that portion filled in accord with permits received from federal and state agencies exercising jurisdiction over such area, any permitted Uplands use. 6. Conditional Uses a. Dune Preservation Zone: (1) None. Adopted August 1, 1990 138 Revised Through 04/15/99 7 Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations b. Uplands: (1) Hotel, motel, resort, rooming and boarding houses, tourist court, and time-share or transient lodging facilities with rooms or dwelling units used for occupancies of less than four weeks, provided that the number of rooms does not exceed the residential densities set forth in subsection 7 of this Section. (999) (2) Athletic and entertainment clubs or facilities, provided that the proposed use will not generate traffic in excess of that projected for the parcel if developed at the maximum permitted residential density. (sm (3) Bed and Breakfast Residences, subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.20. (4) Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (tom) C. Wetlands: (1) Marinas and boat launching facilities, provided that the area of wetland altered does not exceed five (5%) percent of the wetlands located on the parcel proposed for development; (2) Utility transmission facilities; (3) For that portion filled in accord with permits received from Federal and State agencies exercising jurisdiction over such area, any conditional upland use. Residential Densities a. Maximum Residential Densities Except as provided in paragraphs b and c of this subsection, no structure shall be constructed, built, moved, remodeled, occupied, or used as a residential use at a density greater than the applicable maximum residential density set forth in this paragraph. MAXIMUM RESIDENTIAL DENSITIES (Expressed as percentage of maxirtwm density set forth in the future land use designation of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan) NHIRD SHIRD - N SHIRD - S -COMMENCMENT LEVEL 15% 18% 9% LEVEL 2 36% 28% 45% LEVEL 3 54% 100% 100% LEVEL 4 100% does not apply does not apply When the maximum percentage indicated in the table above would yield less than one (1) unit per acre, a maximum density of one (1) unit per acre shall apply except for the R/C (Residential Conservation) future land use designation. Properties within the R/C future land use designation shall have their density computation based upon .2 du/ac for all lands above mean high water. Adopted August 1, 1990 139 Revised Through 04/15/99 Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations b. Existing Uses Any structure, project or use that exceeds the applicable maximum residential density set forth in paragraph (a) of this subsection or the maximum building height set forth in paragraph 11(b)(2) of this section, shall not be subject to the provisions of this subsection but shall be considered a pre-existing use and be subject to the provisions of Section 11.07.05(G) if and only if: (1) The structure, project, or use has been occupied or constructed, or has received a building permit, site plan, or other County development approval prior to July 12, 1984; and (2) Development of the structure, project, or use is completed within all applicable approval periods and time limits. No change or alteration of a pre-existing use as defined in this paragraph shall be permitted if the change or alteration would allow a residential density exceeding that set forth in the building permit, site plan, or other County development approval for such existing pre- existing use. C. Payment of Alternate Development Fee. A site plan for a structure may be approved at a density greater than the applicable maximum set forth in paragraph a of this subsection upon the condition that the developer pay to the Board of County Commissioners the applicable alternate development fee set forth in this paragraph. In addition, if the proposed development, together with existing and previously approved development, will necessitate any roadway, bridge, or other improvement to maintain Level of Service C annually or D during peak season, or will require any traffic control device or access improvement, the site plan shall not be approved except upon the condition that building permits not be issued until after such improvement or traffic control device is installed or until the developer has executed a contract for construction of needed improvements and has provided security in a form and amount acceptable to the County Attorney. The alternate development fee shall be payable at issuance of building permits and for each unit exceeding the maximum set forth in paragraph (a) of this subsection. ALTERNATE DEVELOPMENT FEES (amount per residential unit exceeding the maximum permitted at NHIRD SHIRD - N SHIRD - S $2,336 $4,604 $ 13,697 Each alternate development fee represents an amount equal to the estimated cost per residential unit to provide the transportation improvements specified in subsection 8 of this Section. All alternate development fees collected pursuant to this paragraph shall be received and expended solely for the transportation improvements, or equivalent, specified in subsection 8 of this Section. Nothing in the paragraph shall permit a structure to be constructed, built, moved, remodeled, occupied, or used as a residential use at a density exceeding the maximum set forth in Level 4 for the NHIRD subdistrict or in Level 3 for the Adopted August 1, 1990 140 Revised Through 04/15/99 Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations SHIRD-N and SHIRD-S subdistricts. d. Increase in Maximum Residential Densities If, at any time after a residential use is approved under paragraph a of this subsection, the capacity of the roadway system in a subdistrict increases to the extent that maximum residential densities increase from the Commencement Level to Level 2, from Level 2 to Level 3, or from Level 3 to Level 4, a developer may submit a development application for the subject property for additional density as long as the development proposed in the application, when considered with the initially approved development, meets the requirements of this section and all other provisions of this Code. e. Credit for Payment of Roads Impact Fee Any roads impact fee paid pursuant to Section 1-17-30 of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, shall be credited against the applicable alternate development fee as set forth in Section 3.01.03.AA(7)(c) of this Code. 8. Traffic Capacity Levels For the purposes of this Code, the following levels of service or equivalent capacity, as determined to be acceptable by the Board of County Commissioners, shall govern the density of development according to subsection 7 of this Section. A traffic capacity level shall be deemed available when the Board of County Commissioners or other appropriate authority has accepted a construction bid for the stated improvement. a. Commencement Level (1) Existing conditions. Level 2 (1) NHIRD - Existing conditions as of October 12, 1983, together with the addition of northbound right turn lane at Old Dixie Highway and the North Beach Causeway and signalization improvements at that intersection, and the addition of a southbound right turn lane at State Road Al A and Atlantic Beach Boulevard. (2) SHIRD-N - Existing conditions together with the improvement of Seaway Drive to a four lane road from the South Beach Causeway Bridge to Binney Drive, the addition of a northbound left turn lane at the intersection of Ocean Drive and Binney, and the improvement of Ocean Drive in the City of Fort Pierce to a three lane road. (3) SHIRD-S - Existing conditions together with the improvement of either: (a) the Jensen Beach Causeway to a four lane facility, together with improvement of Indian River Drive to a four lane road between the Jensen Causeway and Jensen Beach Boulevard, the improvement of State Road Al to a four lane roadway from the Jensen Beach Causeway to a point one mile north of the St. Lucie - Martin County line, and the improvement of Jensen Beach Boulevard to U.S. 1 to four lanes; (b) the Stuart Bridge to a four lane facility, together with the four laning of the Ocean Boulevard Causeway from Indian River Plantation west through the Adopted August 1, 1990 141 Revised Through 04/15/99 '4n' `fr/ Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations intersection of Monterey Road, and the four laning of State Road Al A from the Jensen Beach Causeway to a point one mile north of the St. Lucie County - Martin County line; or (c) the construction of a two lane bridge to South Hutchinson Island at the Walton Road corridor, together with improvements of Walton Road to four lanes west of the Savannahs to U.S. 1. C. Level (1) NHIRD - Level 2 improvements plus expansion of the North Beach Causeway to four lanes from north of Atlantic Beach Boulevard to U.S. 1, and the addition of a north bound right turn lane at U.S. 1 and Seaway Drive. (2) SHIRD-N - Level 2 improvements plus the four laning of Seaway Drive from Binney Drive to Ocean Drive or an equivalent improvement, improvement of Ocean Drive within the City of Fort Pierce to a four lane road, and the addition of a northbound right turn lane at the intersection of U.S. 1 and Seaway. (3) SHIRD-S - Existing conditions togetherwith two of the improvements specified under Level 2 above. d. Level (1) NHIRD - Level 3 improvements plus grade separation of the North Beach Causeway and the Florida East Coast Railway tracks, an interchange at Seaway Drive and U.S. 1, or other improvements that will provide at least Level of Service D conditions during the peak season at the Seaway Drive and U.S. 1 intersection, and the four laning of State Road Al A from north of Atlantic Beach Boulevard to the Indian River County line. (2) SHIRD-N - Does not apply. (3) SHIRD-S - Does not apply. 9. Environmentally Sensitive Areas The residential densities permitted in the Dune Preservation Zone and in the wetlands may be used only if clustered to uplands located on the parcel proposed for development, or if clustered to that portion of the wetlands filled in accord with permits received from federal or state agencies exercising jurisdiction over such area. 10. Lot Size Requirements Single Family Development: Lot size requirements for detached single-family dwelling units shall be in accordance with the lot size requirements for the RS-4 District found in Table 1 in Section 7.04.00. b. Multi -Family Development: Lot size requirements for multiple -family dwelling units and two- and three-family dwelling units shall be in accordance with the lot size requirements for the RM-11 District found in Table 1 in Section Adopted August 1, 1990 142 Revised Through 04/15/99 'fir *41OF Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations 7.04.00. 11. Dimensional/Building Height Requirements a. Single Family Development: Dimensional requirements for detached single-family residential units shall be in accordance with the dimensional requirements for the RS-4 District found in Table 7.10 in Section 7.04.00, with the exception of residential densities that are outlined in this section and the requirements of Section 4.01.00, Hutchinson Island - Building Height Overlay Zone. b. Multi -Family Development: Dimensional requirements for all multiple -family dwelling units and two -and three-family dwelling units shall be in accordance with the dimensional requirements for the RM-11 District found in Table 7.10 in Section 7.04.00, except as follows: (1) Residential densities shall be as set forth in subsection 7 of this Section. (2) For any structure that has not been occupied constructed, or has not received a building permit, site plan or other County development approval prior to January 10, 1995 the requirements of Section 4.01.00, Hutchinson Island - Building Height Overlay Zone shall apply. 12. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements Off-street parking and loading requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.06.00. 13. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.09.00. 14. Nonconforming Lots of Record Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, the provisions of Section 10.00.04 shall govem the erection of a single-family dwelling and customary accessory buildings on any single lot of record existing on the effective date of this Code. 15. Additions to Recreational Vehicles, Mobile Homes, and Travel Trailers a. Notwithstanding any other provision of this section, any mobile home, recreational vehicle, or travel trailer park space located in this district shall be considered an existing conditional use under Section 11.07.05(G) if and only if: (1) the mobile home has been erected and occupied, or the recreational vehicle or travel trailer park space constructed and used, prior to the effective date of this Code; and (2) the mobile home, recreational vehicle, or travel trailer park space was a fully conforming use on the effective date of this Code. b. No addition to an existing mobile home shall be permitted unless the addition meets all requirements of the RMH-5 District. Adopted August 1. 1990 143 Revised Through 04/15/99 `%Noe Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations C. No Recreational Vehicle, Travel Trailer, Detached Single Family Residence, Class A Mobile Home or addition thereto shall be permitted unless the Recreational Vehicle, Travel Trailer, Detached Single Family Residence, Class A Mobile Home or addition thereto meets all applicable requirements of Section 7.10.16 (RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS) in existing recreational vehicle parks, or Section 7.10.17 (MOBILE HOME PARKS) in existing mobile home parks. d. An addition in existence as of April 18, 1989, (Ordinance 89-09) which does not meet the requirement established in this Section shall be deemed a nonconforming structure and shall be subject to the provisions of Section 10.00.03. However, existing additions which pose a threat of imminent danger to the health, safety, orwelfare of the general public as determined by the Fire Marshal pursuant to the Standard for Fire Safety Criteria for Mobile Home Installations, Sites, and Communities, NFPA 501 A-1982, as applicable, must be brought into compliance or removed. The decision of the Fire Marshal may be appealed to the Board of Construction and Appeal. 16. Sea Turtle Protection Sea turtle protection requirements shall be in accordance with Section 6.04.02. Adopted August 1, 1990 144 Revised Through 04/15/99 Tl j � 17, i fff i i Vl O Vl[ Vl O� n v M,a r N(sf E O�Mj M•M M O, V1 (V1 Vl Vl !D`1T OBI O, at vlv MIM Mi Mj Vl' O,i �< M,M V1 O, [�iM V'1 t O ONO�O.;O,�" V N M,�+ [_00M0,00� V1'' h b M O,�[�i .r 7 O n M'M 'O.O N O,: 'DMif� M N O t M M�lr. N�N o0 00 �{ 00 O.V Vj V' O h O.�TfO� M Yl M. h i O� �i O�?I v zl- M M!M N1M �O M R�O�i CC n IO Yl h �O�O��O��O� v,n Mt0 h h v v M M V'1 v M O 00 �+ w1 V1 i V1 Yl (D\ O1, VI m Q+ 0\(� v'O civ vt Mr.--r M: Mi MjM jj� z �y E . p ?2�O 12 ii EE �1€ i (��-17: z�?��Iwli { 1( ,.,] ; I j, . �a-7 .7.`�;�ij��t�i ZIfi�izw+i W�w. V.!aU� iCaaJ(Vaa� <,�aii°uzi;ail�ifiiO� (pt��lrny[�lyZrn{ti�rn,t�w]Nlf��Z'�i�IlIal x`x a4; UaaU aU h laJ laaJ h lJ dVd !�y ocnzp�,a�iil�3xaiaw%iilii�a F. U dUdi i lg�iiit�titi� aUa w U Vaa aU� aUaI0 aUa U ¢U¢! °NIIIIII��'! C�1xRFRi3Rl'OR1IRR�Rz w UIcS i raZR RRSd'II� I iit 3t M M o. �D 10 3 i ' 10, �; t p'MR M{ alx �xlxl�jxl �3A AA}'A� xix AAAAAA x x x�� x+ z `uOAA Qi �Hi zQA�1AAz4AA!�A�Z¢A °j �U+ °y� �a O ayi O Oj X! �� Ojj O O !oko W! oLn NV NO O�O C4 O t/� w l h p"' O M !II ti l 0 'n hi� w Fiox4 �IOr3I00ip�rn? Nn UjEX ' j �n 3M �n � pA N!O OOa'OOOUoo F N ``jj rn O v� vn �n 3 U rn W�E vOi T M 1� p b b N i 4 �O �O «<00000 t i �Oth ��OO I� l� �O h �O PPP...... ' pp .-+�z V1 1 M P vOip 'O ! ��OO O N O vOi�O, I� vOi vOi l� l� vOi l� M vOi vOi vOi O"O �O �O I� �D i 1O M�vOi 00 0. 00 00 b 00 eo 00 00 00 OO M 00 7 Q� .�. �; 00 OO a. ^� I W N oo M o0 00 00 00 00 0o i o0 00' �D 1 r s �pMi ( •7 ( i j � 'i ! � ��a a E 4 g<gI �y a 3 �aS ° O "i � tirn " a Az as aOGC7 w ya,g O ,q: `� vi x FO.O ° S �Z dd w,..� p wU ti y x § � A a U a� rxMUM°� zzz ;yy a3 O O �C 3 07 U� ..d ��O r�Th��Tc�> Z a��aaaaaaaawwoauaraaammaamaaoamoawUUUUc�UUUU - T 00 0RR0 QQQ� Y1 I 1Q,� �`}QRyyQQ{{GG 00 ``jQSQQ`j��{{ffii i N �t Y1 �QQO 0QQ0 Ol N lQQ� VQQ1 QN T ��}}QQ�� QM_ T T �OQ��SxSyy T T T T RR T QM T }QMQ}{{ �lQQ�� QQ T T T T QQ� QO_ T T T QQ T T �VQ�1 ,lQ,� T T T �Q�Q T .QVNQ.V,, T T ,VQQ1 T Q_ �QO T T T T 9 O A s�ss 19 'Yl s�sss 41 ss s 7 s sali ss R s ssssso M M V1 h M M M M h h h h M M M M h h N V1 M h M h Y1 M h M R M h AV1 M M M M V'1 V1 h h h h h M M M M N N Y1 h M M In N< M M h N M M V < M mM M M V1 h h M M h h M M h M M h< M M V1 V1 M N h M M 1n N M h M V1 N M V1 Q 7 h 7 h M M M M M M V1 V1 V1 V1 Vl. V1 M M M ON 07 F7T! 10 T�F C4 M M !,T; �p W iz R A C, 0, .01 m < �lu C 0 0 IM 0 ���F`C7 m oz u N1 00 CD 'Im 10 10 IX < I > Im Im u 0 eq 110 Q C. 0 0 f, �c 10 oo 00 w CIO nln m rl m t- § wim (D eq vtic m Ir 100 c- cc 'n VO% 00 4 .0 C4 00 r- C4 C4 v IR 00 ,Ji:; .11 wit ; ; ja:'I �i �p � 10 El 0, ZO o < Ai Poo 0 z 0 08 0 0 OZ 0 a jz R g R Q R I. V) M N t- CD Q CD c W, 4 C4 C4 — — — 44W%44� C4 0 c R, In' "4' — — 000 "4 fianH__� A"AR'_ _iRl-, lln I m I I i9n en I Maim, M Vf V1 n ugl cn �"m a Y1 m M m Tm t-: t-, C� oo a, ol v viv 't v 1M-M MGM en cn MIM C- ol a, v! -V m en t- a, ool'o V, m t- c, (21 wl -W, w m 0 ti I w v w I V V! V 101 -T In C- (71 TIN O'l 1 C4 g .r -Ti 4-- to i �el r.! Ee L rs( ZO z to cn � 0 10 �MfM10. o Q zvt ml p i Z, 10 cn CD C. R �Z, w F5 Z im 01 V) O? GO8 hig LI-r!o 0 eo >rnrnrn R Cq Ti I 'o R m (4 =[Go t, 00.00 0, 'o loo coloo 00 a, GO 00 'o C4 r 00 00 'o C4 6i ( iQ= i ' ' � ; ( � I z iQQ �Ui ZI ZO < > > 43 Gn M q z glo 08 a I 8 L M.2" 0 Me IM 8 =0 lie 0 0 0 l z 810.0 I 5 MI.M121ala �1119N !Z 0 m 41"lp 0 C�n mol QN m i 2 i 0�' 'mo m 0, m w 'o v eq C4 — 10 I= Q C, 4 , 4 4 m en In In en en mien[ I Imlen A 4141 m m �j m 'n 'nieni 'V? v m IMIM m cn m 4 I m ml -I I I w'l �l rl'91 4 4 0) m m --r A m m m 'n "t In, M, m m m In vQ, "m m 'n ON q ti 00 i pp , `00 00 t`i� oolr e� M to C V'i �o V1.O O€vl �O N +n,'n ( V' Q\ : M O� 00 ( M I o�' o, M V. < 00 � (< 00 V' I V' V'IM(M €vi r, t-"0 h h h tt o� T 1 O� � 00 1 V' i V' i 0 O M; M.'+ oioya�tn M. NIM Vl O M N o� 00 � 00 1 V' NI V' V•IM ; r, N V1 o� o+ V' � V' MAIM CCO M V• ,� h O, � V' M bM M O� tt�� 00 � t� O t``a'ol Y1 of V' M - O � 00 �.. to 1� - O O, 00, v V' M {vi ICI PA P, V' T VlI Y1 V1 , pppp�� O�' O� T I� 0 � 00 � V I V' V' 00 V' M M M O r`E�n�o�M��`�oic� .1 Yl O Vl O � j V• M O OIIM COI•-+ O -, O�!V1 � N � V' � V• I V' NAM M:M , Cc�a Li 1 U i W RS t Io 'aw a ii ii` N�Zm o��II? ��toZW�o i�I 2t�cWa a'! wE€ 'aZW�c UWz N�� �f1II WaZZs z Wzw aZzWs u`i ZzWoa I� �I d zmzW �]tn�'ZzWcc E I S I Ca7 czzWa I�2zWco WZwz H yi aw zawasj � F�lwczzao iU1' �tZW��'!o:za ir2Wyamy�Ra,,.''( pH� ul o001 io 0RmoH t00015a'0 a�zzWm i (��1ii000 I INS00 j I�`3 ajaG Aii O .-• iVl w'Il, ( '�O I I M i r1IM o+ 6 �' z t�>'1 l� iM i € t N' E/fi I Oj 1i Opt! h OI O O IV' i7ti 'M :N :O{ j i.N.l m WIoA �'A) i31AAyQQ'p�� W� AAA EmHUNg qA� Aw gaEaAAOI ����oUo Ax{ WH( atAmA o h Q to M to w [/J ; CA !O O:M i0 O 3w, ' y h Q, f0 O'y ,� 141r p { h tI] y O to O •"7 } h O'.O z,�x � N VI i VJ y p IIJJ M O'O O m h x'b{ �W+ O � m h O C d oo� r, o 0 00 ^' V1 00 i V' a0 00 i V1 v1I o o t� h) 00 T V1 M! V o� v1 �(- �I o N 00 vl Vl �o t� 00 00 . 00 eo V' N r 00 n v N 'o V1 e 00 N M O� M i Vl o: o M 100 O Yl Vl Vl e�o�^ °Ion ° O .� 00 00 a M O o 10 o V' 00 S I Vl o �€ o M a0 N 00 E , ( i I o a i � E I E € E i 1 C7 a' �U al lu 0 i I a U) ' �I alao'�xl ij 1 �� rnp �! �•,x I 5 S°�3 �U �o U � dam up �! Ww^ �• •, .a � a w x^ � t5 zp�AU �� xW �x rn Uq p� C7 va € 5lxa�^ �z z: ° x rn Aa tiU� c7 �,� •�i � °ou% .�1F��� � Z sl a ! UU 00 to j WW 0:I, •.D���oiCv�ov�C�CEoo'v�v�...eo...00�oC, m�_ W °°L^i��0'�L''v��"Q-'Q<vv_iC'\'v'Lv�ceo�o N M a0 �o 00 lo QNq VQ/ VQ1 MQ NT- �XQ ,Q ,VQ1 jQ{NQ SQT, jQ{ QM QM QX NQ QM ``�y�{ Q QN �XQ QM Q Q VQ1 ,Q �SQ� 4 ,Q Q St o 0 V1 Y1 I v v v v k V' V' v1 V' N w1 ht V' V' V' {� M M M M M M M M M M V1 V1 n In 0 0 V1 1$ V1 N a* V1 � M M M M h N � V1 0 0 V1 Y1 V' M M V1 � 0 N V1 V� M M V1 N 0 N V' Vt M M N N 0 V1 V M � N m V1 0 V1 � v1 M m Yn N 0 N '� M N 0 V1 � M � 0 0 Y1 4 '7 V' M M V1 n 0 0 0 0 4 V1 V'1 N 4 h R V• 4V V1 M M M M M M 0 0 0 h +n "r... V' V' w1 4 M M M M 0 o S o r... V' � V' V' M M M M t a ' U r i N i N N, It O N M N N W O� O� O� , T O� 1 O, .Ni N O� € Of 0� O ;O��V€00 M'V Vi[�IV M M M M I M; M �O V Mt V M M M; O i 1 < N t N ' N O+ O� N i O� V�Oi VIR M Mi V 1 M N' N iI C1. 0� Q M M t N N O� O� <I�t� M I MITI M i o0 OO��I�f��f N: O>\ M N O. ! M N f .�} N N O� i O I O� i O� T O, O1 O� fit? Q�7i� 7j- M Oi MI MGM M�Mi Ml O. (.r 0. aD R V N I III M1�0 M;N 10 j 1, m 0+ tt E!V' OiM MjM i I d;¢¢ aaIxx , aa 1a d G7'; Ctll W W an € vI � , � ; y ti SS �j aa� Zedd Wkl fW v� i �n V� aa &0 0 v� V� a a cazzz W V� ! to 1 ° C7 C7 co �' a m s V� dd1Em �W ui W WSW WW W W to € v� 1 v� V� � v� v! � V1 $ tz7 I f2�j i I� �' Waz W V� �rn�,7.� tr2j O 6 € UW � O i i�1p jM7Na o ON on pi , $ iOaf �O $l.sa H o_i mao �.' e oo I :N O ! la�xxxxxx��o�xx! EAAA:zgAA�zgA Appgq<�� iAA° x;x�axxaa� AA AA�AAA a�aal AAA; x'aaaxaa�x A�AAAAAA zaA cya a) A��A i I M1 ��,U��ti,dh�rnrni N N Oi--� O: N C OF. N N b ... b b 00m- 00 VN 00 00 NIO n ,N �O 00 : 00 ',O 00 OE �O �0 aD 00 O10 P P 00 00 VE O O1, N00 O O O%� p€�7_0_ O i '0 Nb ; � 0 yP-H-01" o0 'O 4 N 00 W � s �O p4�p4 1 € F cc aQ i Z w rn rn y rn O F'vpi 6 � ycn z 09 ° dUU�UU�� N 00 tQQV+1 fQ�1 1 ^ O_ ^ N [� ^ N N M .•. N O. N O O � M N N O N QN Q� ,0QYQ0,� ��Q� R„ �Q�Q Q„ }Q44}{{ QM m NttNtt K R M N N M M M N N N M N V M N N �V Y ? < 7 M M M M M M M N 4 N M M M V Y M M N N M M N Y1 4 V M M N R M N M N 4 N M M N}} Ntt Y Y M M N N N '4 V' 7 N M M M n N M YOl V A V V M M N N < V M M M M FL M M M N N N N N N N N M N N N M N N N N V1 V1 N N M V1 N N N N M N N N N M N N N N M N. N. M I Coir- I or, v ,nim C, 00 — AIP t� 1 t� M V, 'o M r. V, (), M Clt-j M M 'V�P. 0% eq 8 'n;a t- 1 ,�t -,ri -�V- C), i M c4i -V t a, M o'i 0 M= (n t- '-r, r, =im, wi V) IV, It", t- (7, 0, 'o 0, a, 1; ON M M 0 In !o e I te 0. re, io�. gif" 4—L 0 UX u z z C4 V1 M cq V 1 C4 a -V 10 I 10 vl 00 r- 0,; 0 58 8 5 88 8 u O a, -n 1C=A oC nn M W1 C>a C 888 mv� m C4 w i4q A, 14 �"o 9;110 w w M t- — oo — W w M w w C4 01 En 0 RE 10 8 NI > .0 Aso aQ All iz GO M lm W W =0 Go W m W11 o R Bt 0106 66 >0 0 >- C4 —0 29 iT oo C5 89 S C 8 Z; C"D a Hy in W% " = 11� V� D 4 in 44 4 4 M In M M VM1ML , �I� MW 'nim -M in 41 M Mim 4 n Q 11 M" 'n 1,n "HIN CQ 4 "M 'n C4 CQD 4 wM, en C4 V 4 M ""I M M — Q '9 ",MMMMMM M" -n in in C-4 — a Q Q 0 'T 19 en in IM1,MR, — C4 0 0 Q r r '9 C4 C, r r M 1,1,nlm 'n — - — — — — — C4 Q 0 W, M I en, cnl M I en, en I en I M M M M M M M 'n 'n AGENDA REQUEST I BM NO. 4E DATE: 08/17/99 CONSENT [ ] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg.[ ] Quasi-Jud. [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS (PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Community Development Direr SUBJECT: Request for Rezoning of Property located at 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1 from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional)Zoning District - Draft Resolution 99-148 BACKGROUND: Petition of Croce Giambanco for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District. The stated purpose of the rezoning is to allow the subject property to be developed for an Institutional Residential Home for developmentally disabled adults. (File No.: RZ-99-019) PREVIOUS ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 with 3 members absent (Mr. Merritt, Mr. Lounds, and Mr. Ramon Trias), recommended approval of the rezoning at its July 15, 1999, meeting. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Draft Resolution 99-148 changing the zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for property located at 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1. COMMISSION ACTION: APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: h ^-- Do6gl s M. Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Department: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-148 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Community Development Director Date: August 11, 1999 Subject: Petition of Croce Giambanco, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District) Zoning District. (File No.: RZ-99-019) The proposed rezoning of property, located at 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1, from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District is to allow for the development of the subject property as an Institutional Residential Home for developmentally disabled adults. At the July 15, 1999, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 with three members absent, recommended approval of this petition. This proposed rezoning meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends the approval of this petition for a change in zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District as set forth in Draft Resolution 99- 148. SUBMITTED: Julia Shewchuk, AICP Community Development Director hf cc: Croce Giambanco File '*'✓• 'r% 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 RESOLUTION 99-148 FILE NO.: RZ-99-019 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE CG (COMMERCIAL, GENERAL) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE I (INSTITUTIONAL) ZONING DISTRICT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Croce Giambanco presented a petition for a change in zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the property described below. 2. On July 15, 1999, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the hereafter described request for a change in zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the property described below. 3. On August 17,1999, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. _ 4. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 5. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the existing and proposed use of property in the surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. The proposed change in the Zoning District Classification for that property described as follows: SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, THAT PART OF THE SOUTH V. OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 LYING WEST OF U.S.1 AND EAST OF THE TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD; BEGIN AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. 1 AND THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTH %: OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 THENCE RUN WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE 220.60 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD; File No.: RZ-99-019 August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-148 Page I im rn THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY 317.20 FEET; THENCE TURN 90 DEG AND RUN SOUTH 62 DEG 36 MIN 04 SEC EAST 97.75 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY 245.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (Tax ID#: 1406-124-0002-000/4). (Location: 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1.) owned by Croce Giambanco, is hereby changed from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District. B. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the change to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis XXX Vice -Chairman John D. Bruhn XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 170` Day of August 1999. ATTEST: Deputy Clerk BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA M Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: hf H:\WP\RESOLLTTI.N\FINISHED.99\Giambanco.RZ\GiambancoRES.wpd File No.: RZ-99-019 August 17, 1999 County Attorney Resolution 99-148 Page 2 O—A'"•-- z U e C W W T N a r N W E CDC tOOEN W O O d p M o TI V/ J w a e I r t0 4 0 Nta�,� 0. r11 � loo U ` N t �L£ Wv a o[ O -S w A? OL i O i y � ti W 6�^ P Pvim� f 9 F W '- as P ad PARK A 0Y ti y Oi Y � O � Q r, W cp aC Ol am VIA Y 9l r' on K } z D 0 N1YKM�OwB 0 U z avow kt" 0 V P/oY 0111 a�aW 3MI 3aNvw U CIO ........ avow TNv3 V30v3N ir W O r OY 'Mall T70 La z avow a33NS WON Nolltiv3 do Za ac Q ►Z-3 WW3 z W W ti S M in off S Y£ 1 S S£ 1 S 9£ 1 KLNf100 3380HO33>10 bb o, `fir., r4111r/ Croce Giambanco Zoning 18 /9 - 20 I IT o S-2 40 I o- 58 59 I 60 (r i I = a o -�3 o U x ?3 � in1 //9 1 /20 AR-1 0 a� 38 /39 /10 I -�--- CG /W I 160 � � a 0 r: �o ffq too I ; C 2w � I i 20 i 2W Q c o I I I 239 I 240 2 p 259 I 250 Community Development RZ 99-01 Geographic Information Systems Map revised June 22,1999 �JQ Ti mO w e� rMw ba�0�r•+'a w w'wo P�Var MF vwr w.r wonw Y.w ..d r rr+r �. imreww.a mr. 7� T Ybrrlan yprYY.�Y MYYnM buM Ypy eYda OmYiwl 1V *%We *4111110 Croce Giambanco Land Use 18 li 20 _T -t 0 Jd � J8 I � 4 1 Q RU w 59 I w 0 --{----}--- 1 =o a a 1--- o -;13 o x. -)3 go 99 /W RU AS 1 119 120 Q I to ° M 1 /J9 CO _�-_- 1 1 55 159 1 r5o � � a 0 I I ; , C 200 ¢� I I � era 1 w 1 1 220 1 o I cQ J8 1 2J9 1 240 2 . 1 1 � I I � 1 -9 I 1 250 I Community Development RZ 99-019 Geographic Information Systems Map revised June 22,1999 m. � ti. e..� od,ww b awr+nbo+v .r rb.o aowor ooy. ,w,r ..r wonw e.r n.r a wrir �+as�rirnom .moor �j ranrr, prwhnr mtFbWC br. r � Ma+i r�sn manr'. 1V **M-e Noe PUBLIC HEARING - CROCE GIAMBANCO FILE NO. RZ-99-019 Mr. Hank Flores presented staff comments. Mr. Hank Flores that he was presenting the petition of Croce Giambanco for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for property located at 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1. Mr. Flores stated that the purpose of the rezoning is to establish an Institutional Residential Home. Mr. Flores stated that the surrounding zoning to the subject property is CG (Commercial, General) to the north, south, and east across North U.S. Highway No. 1. AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) to the west across Turnpike Feeder Road. Mr. Flores stated that the proposed home is next to a restaurant also owned by the applicant. The subject property is currently the location of a non -conforming apartment complex. The intent of this rezoning is to allow for the establishment of an Institutional Residential Home for developmentally disabled adults. Mr. Flores stated that staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms with the standards of review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff is, therefore, recommending that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions for Mr. Flores. Mr. Moore stated that the staff report reflects this is to establish an Institutional Residential Home for developmentally disabled adults. Mr. Moore asked Mr. Flores if this would come under item c as a permitted use in I (Institutional). Mr. Flores stated yes, an Institutional Residential Home which could be a Congregate Care Facility or an Adult Living Facility. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Flores if this potential facility is approved and licensed by HRS (Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services). Mr. Flores stated no because at this time the facility does not meet code requirements. Ms. Dreyer stated that she does not believe HRS will license the facility without confirmation of zoning. Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 19 En cm Chairman Wesloski asked if the applicant was present and would like to address the Board. Mr. Croce Giambanco, 797 13'' Avenue, Vero Beach, addressed the Board. Mr. Giambanco stated that he owns Nino's Italian Restaurant, which is adjacent to the subject property. Many residents, as well as, law enforcement know the reputation of the subject property where he rents apartments on a weekly and monthly basis. Mr. Giambanco stated that his wife and her sisters have worked in assisted living facilities for a number of years and they would like to have their own facility. He stated that he owns the land and provided the Board with a proposed drawing of what the facility will look. He stated that they would like to provide a good facility to the community. Mr. Giambanco provided for the record a letter from Florida Department of Children & Families stating their support. He stated that he believes his facility will benefit the neighborhood, the community, and St. Lucie County. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions for Mr. Giambanco. Mr. Moore asked Mr. Giambanco what size building is presently on the property. Mr. Giambanco stated approximately 3,000 square feet. He stated that there are eight apartments, which he recently remodeled to make them liveable. Mr. Moore asked Mr. Giambanco if he plans to have any more than eight apartments or expanding the building. Mr. Giambanco stated no. He stated that there will be less traffic because the residents will not be able to drive, they need assistance. He stated that the area will be secure and that he would like to make this a nice place for the residents. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any other questions for Mr. Giambanco. Mr. Matthes asked Mr. Giambanco if he is going to convert the existing apartments to this facility. Mr. Giambanco stated yes. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any further questions for Mr. Giambanco. At this time, Chairman Wesloski opened the public portion of the hearing. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone that would like to speak in favor of or in opposition to this petition. Mr. Bill Hearn, who resides in Indrio, addressed the Board. Mr. Hearn stated that his personal Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 20 contact with the subject property dates back to 1952 when his parents ran a restaurant and gas station at this location. He stated that Mr. Giambanco has done a wonderful job with the building and business. He takes his hat off to Mr. Giambanco. It is a thing of beauty and the residents are proud of it on North U.S. 1. He stated that he supports Mr. Giambanco's efforts if he were to do as presented here tonight with the apartments. He is a good businessman, he has a beautiful property, he has taken a run down area and made something the community can be proud of. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone that would like to speak in favor of or in opposition to this petition. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any further questions for Mr. Giambanco. Hearing no further arguments in favor of or in opposition to the petition, Chairman Wesloski closed the public portion of the hearing. Chairman Wesloski asked what would be the pleasure of the Board. After considering the testimony presented during the public hearing, including staff comments, and the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, Ms. Dreyer moved that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to the application of Croce Giambanco, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District because it conforms with all of the standards of review and there being no objections to the Zoning District change. Mr. McCurdy seconded the motion. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was any discussion. Upon roll call, the motion was approved, 6-0. Chairman Wesloski stated that the petition would be forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 21 FLORIDA DEPARiMEM'OF Jeb Bush CHILDREN, � GOVernor Kathleen & FAM 1 LIES .Kearney Secretary S District 15 337 N. 4th St. Buddy Cline Ft. Pierce, FL. Acting District Administrator 34950 July 15, 1999 To the Board of Commissioners for St. Lucie County Re: Aurora of the Treasure Coast To Whom It May Concern: Mr. Croce Giambanco is very interested in developing an Adult Living Facility in the northern sector of St. Lucie County, adjacent to U.S. Highway 1. He has applied with the State of Florida, District 15, Department of Children and Families to become a Developmental Services Medicaid Waiver provider in order to serve persons diagnosed with developmental disabilities. Mr. Giambanco wishes to offer quality residential services and skills training to this population. If given the Commission's approval for this site location, the Department of Children and Families will most likely certify his company to provide residential services. It is my understanding that Mr. Giambanco already operates a restaurant near this site, and that his restaurant has a good reputation in the business community. As assurance to the Commission, the Department of Children and Families will perform annual quality assurance monitoring of these services, and if we find inadequate service provision, we will decertify Mr. Giambanco from providing these services in the future. If Developmental Services can be of further help, please let us know. You can reach my office at 561-467-3792. Sincerely, Stephen P. Stoltz Senior Human Services Program Specialist Developmental Services Working in partnership with local communities to help people be self-sufficient and live in stable families and communities *%We 1.40 AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1999 roirliffla Petition of Croce Giambanco, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the following described property: (Location: 6609 North U.S. Highway No.1) THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTIONIS A VAILABLE UPON REQUEST If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners on August S, 1999. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on August S, 1999. FILE NO. RZ-99-019 ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and in accordance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. Ludt County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: 1. ANTHONY COSCIA & SONS, L.C:, for'a Change In Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchin- son Island Residential District) Zoning District for the following described property: A parcel of land located on Hutchinson Island In Section 34, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Begin at a point of intersection of the north line of the south 2577.66 feet of the north 2858.86 feet of sold Section 34 and the westerly right-of- way line of SR Ai As thence run South 20 deg 23 min 08 sec East along sold westerly right-of-way line a distance of 440.00 feet, to a point; thence run North 72 deg 24 min 10 sec West a distance of 666.20 feet more or less to the easterly mean high water line of the Indian Rivers thence northerly along sold mean high water line a distance of 215.00 feet more or less to sold north line of the south 2577.66 feet of the north 2858.86 feet of said Section 34; thence run North 89 deg 59 min 38 sec East along sold previously described north line a distance of 459.00 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning (3:81 AC) (Map 35/34N)q (OR 1221.1734) (Tax I.D. No. 3534.111-0004-000/8). (Location: West side of South SR A-1-A, directly across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase 2) 2. FORT PIERCE AIR CENTER (Ernesto Velosco, Agent) has applied for a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport. The proposed Major Adjustment Is to construct a 12,000 square foot hangar (Hangar 13) for the following described property+ Beginning at the southwest comer of Section 29, Township 34 South, Range 40 East run South 89*3114" East 30.00 feet to a.ent lying on the south line of sold sections thence run North,00'26'26 East 625.11 feet parallel to the west line of sold Section to a point, Hance run South 87'51'34" East 36.09 feet to a point; Bald point being the Point of Beginning; from sold Point of Beginning run South 87'51'34" East 668.83 feet to a point; thence run North 45*1526" East 515.68 feet to a point; thence run North 44142'34" West 1314.92 feet to a point, sold point being the P.C. of a curve concave to the west, having a delta angle of 30'04'00" and a radius of 1294.52 fort; thence run In a southerly direction along the arc of sold curve 678.55 fort to a point, sold point being the P.T. of said curve; thence run South 4511726 West 100 feet to a point; thence run South 00'22'26" West 540.00 fort to a point, said point being the Point of Beginning. All lying In Section 29, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St, Lucie County, Florida. (Tax I.D. No. 1429-323-0002-000/6). (Location: 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Lucie County International Airport, Hangar 13) 3. CROCE GIAMBANCO, for a Change In Zoning from the CG (Coi mercial, General) Zoning District to the 1 (Institutional) Zoning District f the following described property: Section 6, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, that part of the south'h the northwest 1h of the northeast 1/4 lying west of U.S. 1 and east of turnpike feeder road; begin at the intersection of the west rightof-way U.S. 1 and the south line of the south 1h of the northwest '/4 of northeast 1/4, thence run west along the south line 220.60 feet to I easterly right-of-way of Turnpike Feeder Road; thence northeaster along the right-of-way 317.20 fee, thence turn 90 deg and run South ! deg 36 min 04 sec East 97.75 feet to the westerly righbof-way of U.S. thence southerly along the right-of-way 245.90 feet to the Point Beginning. (OR 1150-614) (Tax I.D. No. 1406-124.0002-000/4). (Location: 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1) 4. MARLENE HADDEN, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a h residential home within 1,000 feel of another such family resi6 home for the following described property: -- - Sedion 5, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, Sunrise Park No. 1,1 5, Loh 13 and 14, less the south 10 feet (0.31 AC) (OR 1219-2857) I.D. No. 2405-501-0104-000/6). (Location: 3120 Avenue 0) 5. LAKEWOOD PARK AUTOWASH, to approve a 12-month extemlon for an approved Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval to allow for the development of a Car Wash in CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. Section 12, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, Lakewood Park - Unit 12-A, Block 168, Loh 18 and 19 (Map 13/12S) (OR 1095.2992) (Tax I.D. No.1301-615-0036-000/6). (Location: West side of Turnpike FeederRoad, approximately,200 feet south of Winter Garden Parkway) i' 6. DREIDA MCNAIR, for a Conditional use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described property: Section 32, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, Sheraton Plaza, Unit Four Replat, Lot 302 (OR 216-1958) (Tax I.D. No. 1432-807-0060-000/51. (Location: 3009 Anderson Drive) 7. PIPPIN TRACTOR, for o Change in Zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, General) for the following described property.. All that certain tract of parcel of land lying, being and situated in Section 25, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, Florida and this' tract being more particularly described -,as follows: - Commencing at the southwest corner of Section 25, Township 34 South, Range 39 East; thence North 00°06'48" East, along the west line of said Section 25, a distance of 2655.28 feet to a point; thence North 89143'39" East, a distance of 70.98 feet to a point in the east right-of- way line of Kings Highway; thence North 00'Ol'15" East, 30.00 feet along the east right-of-way of said Kings Highway, and the Point of Beginning of the herein described tract of land; thence North 00'01'15" East, along the east right-of-way line of said Kings Highway, a distance of 224.85 feet to a point; thence North 89°46'12" East, a distance of 468.36 feet to a point; thence South 00'01'15" West, a distance of 224.54 feet to a point; thence South 89'4339" West, a distance of 468.36 feet to the Point of Beginning and containing 2.42 acres of land, more or less. (Part of Tax I.D. No.1325-233.0000.000/7). (Location: East side of Kings Highway, approximately'h mile north of St. Lucie Boulevard). PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on August 17, 1999, beginning at 6.00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, H a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commis- sion with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure Hat a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is to be based. BOARD Of COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ PAULA A. LEWIS, CHAIRMAN -- Pub.: Aug. 5, 1999 _nl L 'L, r,o 5 No. 0105 LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMAONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA AUGUST 17. 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section 1 1.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and In accordance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: 1. ANTHONY COSCIA 8r SONS, L.C., for a Change in Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District for the following described property: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED ON HUTCHINSON ISLAND IN SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT A POINT OF NTERSECIK)N OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 2577.66 FEET OF THE NORTH 2868.86 FEET OF SAID SECTION 34 AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SR AiA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 20 DEG 23 MIN 08 SEC EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 440.00 FEET, TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 72 DEG 24 MIN 10 SEC WEST A DISTANCE OF 686.20 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE EASTERLY MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF THE INDUW RIVER; THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE A DISTANCE OF 215.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 2577.66 FEET OF THE NORTH 2858.96 FEET OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE RUN NORTH 89 DEG 59 MIN 38 SEC EAST ALONG SAID PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 459.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (3.81 AC) (MAP 35134MQ (OR 1221-1734)(TAX I.D. NO. 3634-111-0004-000I8). (L.ocatlon: West side of South SR A-1-A, directly across from the Regency Island Dunes Phase 2) 2. FORT PIERCE AIR CENTER (Ernesto Velasco, Agent) has applied for a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport. The proposed Major Adjustment Is to construct a 12,000 square foot hangar (Hangar 13) for the following described property: BEGINNING AT THE SOUiHWIEST CORNER OF SECTION 29. TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST RUN SOUTH 89' 31'34' EAST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUIN NORTH 00.26'26' EAST 625.11 FEET PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION TO A POINT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 87. 51'34' EAST 36.09 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING RUN SOUTH 87. 51'34' EAST 668.83 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 45' 15'26' EAST 515.68 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 44.42'34' WEST 1314.92 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE P.C. OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 30. 04W AND A RADIUS OF 1294.52 FEET-, THENCE RUIN IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 678.55 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE P.T. OF SAD CURVE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 45' 17'26' WEST 100 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUIN SOUTH 0(.22'26' WEST 540.00 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL LYING IN SECTION 29, TOWNNSKP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORID& (UUC I.D. NO. 1429-323-0002-000/6). (location: 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Wcle County International Atrporh, Hangar 13) - 3. CROCE GIAMBANCO, for a Change In Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the following described property: SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 114 LYING WEST OF U.S. 1 AND EAST OF THE TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD; BEGIN AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. 1 AND THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTH Va OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 114 THENCE RUN WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE 220.60 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY 317.20 FEET. THENCE TURN 90 DEG AND RUN SOUTH 62 DEG 36 MIN 04 SEC EAST 97.75 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY 245.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (OR 1150-614) (TAX I.D. NO. 1406-124-00024M4). ti40 (Location: 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1) 4. MARLENE HIDDEN, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described property: SECTION S. TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH. RANGE 40 EAST, SUNRISE PARK NO. 1. BLOCK 5. LOTS 13 AND 14, LESS THE SOUTH 10 FEET (0.31 AC) (OR 1219-2857) (TAX I.D. NO. 2405501-0104.000/6). (Location: 3120 Avenue a) 5. LAKEWOOD PARK AUTOWASH, to approve a 12-month extension for an approved Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval to allow far the development of a Car Wash in CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District. . SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, LAKEWOOD PARK - UNIT 12-A, BLOCK 168, LOTS 18 AND 19 (MAP 13/12S) (OR 1095-2992) (TAX I.D. NO. 1301.615-WM-OOOI6). (I.00atlon: West side of Turnpike Feeder Road, approximaiety 200 feet south of Winter Garden may) 6. DREIDA MCNAIR, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described, properly: SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, SHERATON PLAZA, UNfT FOUR REPLAT, LOT 302 (OR 216-1958) (TAX I.D. NO. 1432-807-0060-0OW5). gDoatlon: 3009 Anderson Drive) 7. PIPPIN TRACTOR, for a Change in Zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/ocre) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, Generaq for the following described property! ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF PARCEL OF LAND LYING, BEING AND SITUATED IN SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA AND THIS TRACT BEING MORE PARTICIAARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH. RANGE 39 EAST. THENCE NORTH 00 06'46' EAST. ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 25, A DISTANCE OF 2655.28 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89' 43'39` EAST, A DISTANCE OF 70.98 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EAST RIGHTOFWAY LINE OF KINGS HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTH 00' 01'1 S' EAST, 30.00 FEET ALONG ill: FAST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF SAID KINGS HIGHWAY, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAID; THENCE NORTH 00. 0115" EAST. ALONG THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LANE OF SAID ICINGS HIGHWAY, A DISTANCE OF 224.85. FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89' 46'12' FAST, A DISTANCE OF 468.36 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE SOUTH (Kr 01'15- WEST, A DISTANCE OF 224.54 FEET TO A POINT-. THENCE SOUTH 89' 43'39' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 468.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 2.42 ACRES OF NAND, MORE OR LESS (PART OF TAX I.D. NO. 1325-233-0000-0OQI ). (L.oca lon: East side of KWv Highway, approximately 'A mile north of St. Lucie Boulevard) PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the Roger Poitras Administration Annex Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on August 17, 1999, beginning at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record Includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ PA M A. LEWIS. CHAIRMAN Publish: August 5, 1999 1 tii � Lr.ui._ EM M TO: FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: LOCATION: PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 07/15/99 File Number RZ-99-019 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Planning and Zoning Commission Planning Manager � , July 6, 1999 Application of Croce Giambanco, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District. EXISTING ZONING: PROPOSED ZONING: FUTURE LAND USE: PARCEL SIZE: PROPOSED USE: North U.S. Highway No. 1 CG (Commercial, General) I (Institutional) COM (Commercial) 0.20 acre Institutional Residential Home PERMITTED USES: Attachment "A" - Section 3.01.03(X) I (Institutional) - contains the designated uses which are permitted by right, permitted as an accessory use, or permitted through the conditional use process. Any use designated as a "Conditional Use" is required to undergo further review and approvals. Any use not found within the zoning district regulations are designated as prohibited uses for that district SURROUNDING ZONING: CG (Commercial, General) to the north, south, and east across North U.S. Highway No. 1. AR -I (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) to the west across the Turnpike Feeder Road. SURROUNDING LAND USES: The general existing use surrounding the property is residential. There are commercial uses along South U.S. Highway No. 1. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is COM (Commercial) M En July 15, 1999 Page 2 FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: UTILITY SERVICE: TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Petition: Croce Giambanco File No.: RZ-99-019 Station #4 (4000 St. Lucie Boulevard), is located approximately 3 miles to the southwest The subject property is served by a well and septic system. The existing right-of-way width for North U.S. Highway No. 1 is 200 feet. None. Concurrency Deferral Affidavit. STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed zoning district is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and specifically has met the standards of Section 11.06.03. 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The proposed zoning district is consistent with the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The COM (Commercial) Future Land Use classification allows I (Institutional) Zoning. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; The proposed zoning is consistent with existing and proposed land uses in the area. The general use of the immediate surrounding area of the subject property is M M July 15, 1999 Page 3 Petition: Croce Giambanco File No.: RZ-99-019 commercial. The subject property has been utilized for a non -conforming apartment complex. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; Conditions have not changed so as to require an amendment. 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; The intended use for this rezoning is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. Prior to the approval of any proposed development, the applicant will need to provide documentation verifying that sufficient facilities are in place to support the development. The subject property is currently the site of a non -conforming apartment complex. If the rezoning is approved, the applicant intends to care for developmentally disabled people. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The site is currently developed. No significant structural changes are anticipated. The applicant will be required to comply with all federal, state, and local environmental regulations. 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; An orderly and logical development pattern will occur with this change in zoning. The surrounding parcels of property are designated for commercial uses, including a restaurant next door also owned by this applicant. The intent of this rezoning is to allow for the establishment of an Institutional Residential Home for developmentally disabled adults. *41w, M July 15, 1999 Page 4 Petition: Croce Giambanco File No.: RZ-99-019 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The petitioner, Croce Giambanco, has requested this change in zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District in order to establish an Institutional Residential Home. The proposed home is next to a restaurant also owned by the applicant. The subject property is currently the location of a non -conforming apartment complex. Attached is a copy of Section 3.01.03(X) - I (Institutional), of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, which delineates the permitted, accessory, and conditional uses allowed in the Institutional Zoning District. If the change in zoning request is approved, the applicant, by right, would be allowed to establish any of the uses under the Permitted Uses section. Any use under the Accessory Uses section would be allowed only if one or more of the permitted uses exists on the subject property. Any use under the Conditional Uses section could only be allowed if it first receives approval through the Board of County Commissioners. Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms with the standards of review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment hf cc: Croce Giambanco File Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations X. I INSTITUTIONAL Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect and environment suitable for institutional, public, and quasi -public uses, together with such other uses as may be compatible with institutional, public, and quasi -public surroundings. The number in "()" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Community residential homes subject to the provisions of Section 7.10.07. (999) b. Family day care homes. (999) C. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that the sponsoring agency or the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) notifies the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. (999) d. Institutional residential homes. (999) e. Parks. (999) f. Police & fire protection t92z1.9=4) g. Recreational activities. (999) h. Religious organizations (eas) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. 6. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00. 7. Conditional Uses a. Amphitheaters. (999) b. Cemeteries. (6m) C. Membership organizations (ee) d. Correctional institutions. (=3) e. Cultural activities and nature exhibitions. (999) f. Educational services and facilities (ee) g. Executive, legislative, and judicial functions. (91,92.93.94.95.96,97) h. Fairgrounds. (999) i. Funeral and crematory services. (726) j. Theaters. (999) Adopted August 1, 1990 132 Revised Through 04/15/99 En rd` Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations k. Medical and other health services. (w) I. Postal service. (43) M. Residential care facilities for serious or habitual juvenile offenders. (M) n. Social services (83) o. Sporting and recreational camps (7o32) P. Stadiums, arenas, race tracks (794) q. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (9w) 8. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following: a. Drinking places (alcoholic beverages related to civic, social, and fraternal uses). (m) b. Restaurants. (Including the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premises consumption only.) (N) C. Funeral and crematory services. (m) d. Heliport landing/takeoff pads. (9w) e. Detached single-family dwelling unit or mobile home, for on -site security purposes. (m) f. Residence halls or dormitories. (9w) Adopted August 1. 1990 133 Revised Through 04/15/99 En �►' AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. DATE: 08/17/99 CONSENT [ ] REGULAR [ ] 4F PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg.[ ] Quasi-Jud. [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: •,,e SUBMITTED BY: Community Development V- C c) Community Dev. Dir. SUBJECT: First Public Hearing on Draft Ordinance 99-017 - Petition of Jacquelene E. Veach amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by Amending Section 7.10.16(Q)(1)(A)(1)(c), to provide for the clarification of common use areas to refer to public or private road rights -of -way only. BACKGROUND: Draft Ordinance 99-017 proposes to amend Section 7.10.16 (Q) (1) (A) (1) (c) , of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code (LDC). This amendment would clarify the definition of common areas as used in Recreational Vehicle Parks. (File Number: PA-99-002 ) 0:281 . -.10 PREVIOUS ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 6 to 0 with 3 members absent (Mr. Merritt, Mr. Lounds, and Mr. Ramon Trias), modified and recommended approval of the request to clarify the definition of common areas as used in Recreational Vehicle Parks. RECOMMENDATTON, Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners consider approving Draft Ordinance 99-017, on first reading, and that in accordance with the public notice provisions of Section 11.00.00 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, hold the second public hearing on this ordinance on September 7, 1999, at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. [ ] APPROVED [ ] DENIED ['A OTHER: 2nd public hearing & to be held on 9-7-99 D C Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget: Originating Department: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) has M. Anderson y Administrator Purchasing: Other: COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: August 17, 1999 Ordinance 99-017 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Community Development Director Date: August 11, 1999 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-017 - Petition of Jacquelene E. Veach amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by Amending Section 7.10.16(Q)(1)(A)(1)(c), to provide for the clarification of common use areas to refer to public or private roadways only. (File Number: TA-99-003) Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 99-017, which proposes to amend Section 7.10.16(Q)(1)(A)(1)(c), of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code (LDC). This amendment would clarify the definition of common areas as used in Recreational Vehicle Parks. This proposed LDC amendment was submitted by Jacquelene E. Veach in accordance with the provision of Section 11.00.01 of the LDC. This petition was not initiated by St. Lucie County. The petitioner would like to amend the definition of common use areas as used in Section 7.10.16(Q)(1)(A)(1(c), to clarify that common uses areas should refer to public or private roadways only when taking the setbacks for structures on side yard comers in recreational vehicle parks. Regular lots within RV Parks are considered to be zero lot line lots. The setbacks for these lots is 8 feet on the left side and 0 feet on the right side. For lots which are adjacent to common use areas that are utilized for pedestrian access, the setback from the pedestrian access is a minimum of 5 feet, regardless of whether the access is located on the left or the right side of the lot. The petitioner is proposing that the setbacks for all lots be the same for all lots, regardless of whether or not there is a pedestrian access adjacent to the lot. The petitioner believes that the current regulations of the LDC do not allow owners of lots in the Nettles Island development to fully utilize the space of their lots. In making any amendment to the TEXT of the Land Development Code, consideration must be given to the ramifications that the proposed change will have on the entire county and not to just one specific location. While this use may be appropriate for the Nettles Island development, it may not be appropriate for all RV Parks in the county. A review of the RV Parks on record in St. Lucie County and on South Hutchinson Island in particular indicate that Nettles Island is the only RV Park that has any common use areas between lots. Therefore, the amendment to the LDC regulations would only directly affect the residents of Nettles Island. On July 15, 1999, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on -fto August 11, 1999 Page 2 Petition: Jacquelene E. Veach File No.: TA-99-001 Draft Ordinance 99-017. At that hearing, and following the acceptance of public comments, the Planning and Zoning Commission recommended, by a vote of 6 to 0 with three members absent, that the Board of County Commissioners approve a modification of the requested change in text to clarify that common uses areas should refer to public or private roadways only when taking the setbacks for structures on side yard corners in recreational vehicle parks. The modification has been included in the attached draft ordinance. Staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval of a change to the text of the LDC which would clarify the definition of common uses areas to refer to public or private roadways only as set forth in Draft Ordinance 99-017. Please let us know if you have any questions. hf cc: Jacquelene E. Veach Ted Oakes File M 1 I ORDINANCE 99-017 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 7.10.16(Q)(1)(a)(1)(c), TO PROVIDE FOR THE CLARIFICATION OF COMMON USE AREAS TO REFER TO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROAD RIGHTS -OF -WAY; BY PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISION, BY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY, PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determination: 1. On August 1, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, adopted the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 2. The Board of County Commissioners adopted certain amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, through the following Ordinances: 91-03 - March 14, 1991 91-09 - May 14, 1991 - 91-21 - November 7, 1991 92-17 - June 2, 1992 93-01 - February 16, 1993 93-03 - February 16, 1993 93-05 - May 25, 1993 93-06 - May 25, 1993 93-07 - May 25, 1993 94-07 - June 22, 1994 94-18 - August 16, 1994 94-21 - August 16, 1994 95-01 - January 10, 1995 95-02 - February 21, 1995 96-10 - August 6, 1996 97-01 - March 4, 1997 97-09 - October 7, 1997 97-23 - September 2,1997 98-01 - February 2,1999 3. On July 15,1999, the Local Planning Agency/Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance after publishing notice in the Port St. Lucie News and Tribune at least 10 days prior to the hearing and recommended that the proposed ordinance be approved. ------------------------------------------------- p2ULjC_UQdQLLjj= is for addition Strike Through is for deletion Ordinance 99-017 1st Draft Page 1 Print Date: 07/08/99 ,%W *W# 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 4. On 199, this Board held its first public hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and Tribune on , 199. S. On 199, this Board held its second public hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and Tribune on , 199. 6. The proposed amendment to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code is consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and is in the best interest of the health, safety, and public welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. SPECIFIC AMENDMENTS TO THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE CAUSING THE CODE TO READ AS FOLLOWS, INCLUDE: ******************************** CHAPTER VII DEVELOPMENT DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 7.10.00 SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS 7.10.16 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS ------------------------------------------------- nrn,hle and line is for addition StrikP Thrnnah is for deletion Ordinance 99-017 1st Draft Page 2 Print Date: 07/08/99 `%W PARAGRAPHS A THROUGH Q (1) (A) (1) (A) : NO CHANGES (b) side yard - eight (8) feet unobstructed on the left side and zero (0) feet on the right side when facing the lot from the center of the main street frontage. In the absence of recorded lots lines, a minimum eight (8) feet unobstructed between adjacent units shall be required. (c) side yard corner - eight (8) foot left side and five (5) foot right side when facing the lot from the center of the main street frontage (includes all properties adjacent to common nse areas nublic and private roadways). In the absence of recorded lot lines, a minimum eight (8) feet unobstructed between adjacent units and five (5) feet from any common use area shall be required. (d) rear yard - five (5) feet. Note: The front yard setback for special situation lots shall be five feet. Special situation lots include those lots in which the longest property dimension is found along the street frontage. ommo"s a eaa shall rAfAr to public and private roadways on1v. Lots adjacent to nedestrianaccess shall not be considered corner lots. For lots with double street frontage, the front yard shall be identified on the approved site plan of the particular Recreational Vehicle Park, which shall be kept on file with the Community Development Department. The front yard for a block of double frontage shall be consistent the length of that block. Double frontage lots are not eligible for special situation consideration or designation. Any deviation or change to the front yard designation that does not include the adjustment of the entire block shall only be approved by the Board of Adjustment in accordance with Section 10.01.00. PARAGRAPHS Q (1) (A) (2 ) THROUGH Q (2) : NO CHANGES PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances and ------------------------------------------------- Do ihl Undprline is for addition Strike Through is for deletion Ordinance 99-017 Page 3 1st Draft Print Date: 07/08/99 *4w.4 ,4y County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable throughout St. Lucie County's jurisdiction. PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk be and is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART F. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon adoption of the Board of County Commissioners. PART G. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis XXX Vice -Chairman John D. Bruhn XXX ------------------------------------------------- ponhIp Undpr1ineis for addition Strike Through is for deletion Ordinance 99-017 Page 4 1st Draft Print Date: 07/08/99 Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX PART H. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be re -numbered or re -lettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through H shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ENACTED this ATTEST: DEPUTY CLERK hf H:\WP\ORD\99-017 day of , 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - nnvhle Underline is for addition Strike Thrrn,ah is for deletion Ordinance 99-017 Page 5 1st Draft Print Date: 07/08/99 0 PUBLIC HEARING - DRAFT ORDINANCE 99-017 Mr. Hank Flores presented staff comments. Mr. Hank Flores that he was presenting Draft Ordinance 99-017 which proposes to amend the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending Section 7.10.16(Q)(1)(a)(1)(c) to provide for the clarification of common use areas to refer to public and private road rights -of -way only. Mr. Flores stated that the proposed amendment was submitted by Jacquelene E. Veach in accordance with the provisions of the St. Lucie Land Development Code. Mr. Flores stated that the petitioner would like to amend the definition of common use areas as used in Section 7.10.16(Q)(1)(a)(1)(c), to clarify that common use areas should refer to public or private rights -of -way only when measuring the setbacks for structures on side yard corners in recreational vehicle parks. Regular lots within RV Parks are considered to be zero lot line lots. The setbacks for these lots are eight (8) feet on the left and zero (0) feet on the right when facing the lot from the roadway. For lots which are adjacent to common use areas that are utilized for pedestrian access, the setback from the pedestrian access is a minimum of five (5) feet, regardless of whether the access is located on the left or the right side of the lot. The petitioner is proposing that the setbacks for all lots be the same for all lots, regardless of whether or not there is a pedestrian access adjacent to that lot. The petitioner believes that the current regulations of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code do not allow owners of lots in the Nettles Island development to fully utilize the space of their lots. Mr. Flores stated that in making any amendments to the text of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, consideration must be given to the ramifications that the proposed change will have on the entire County and not to just one specific location. While this use may be appropriate for the Nettles Island development, it may not be appropriate for all RV Parks in the County. Mr. Flores stated that a review of the RV Parks on record in St. Lucie County and on South Hutchinson Island in particular indicates that Nettles Island is the only RV Park that has any common use areas between lots. Therefore, the amendment to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code regulations would only directly affect the residents of Nettles Island. Mr. Flores stated that staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval of a change to the text of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code as stated in Ordinance 99-017. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions for Mr. Flores. Mr. Moore asked Mr. Flores what negative ramifications this could have on future RV Parks. Mr. Flores stated that he is not aware of any negative ramifications on future RV Parks. He stated Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 27 that Holiday Out and Adventure Out do not have pedestrian access between lots. He stated that this provision of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code directly affects only the Nettles Island development. Mr. Moore asked Mr. Flores if he could foresee any negative impacts for future RV Parks. Mr. Flores stated no. Mr. Grande stated that the staff memorandum states that "A review of the RV Parks on record in St. Lucie County and on South Hutchinson Island in particular". He asked Mr. Flores if he looked at the rest of the County as well as South Hutchinson Island, in that this is not going to affect anything else. Mr. Flores stated yes. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Flores how this concept (Ordinance 96-010) became a part of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Mr. Flores stated that he did not know. He stated that residents have requested variances from this particular provision and staff recommend denial because they did not prove a hardship. The only way around this is to amend the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Flores if anyone has ever identified a reason why this Ordinance (96-010) was put in place in the first place. Ms. Shewchuk stated that when this Ordinance (96-010) was put into effect, typically in the zoning ordinance and in all Zoning Districts have corner side setbacks for structures that are larger than regular side setbacks for structures. The reason for this is to provide for safety and a side distance in proximity and adjacent to public right-of-ways to roads to provide security for the residents from the vehicles and vice versa. The same situation was put into effect in the RV Parks and this section refers only to the RV Parks where an extra five foot corner side setbacks to separate the structures from the public right-of-way. This was also applied to pedestrian access ways which are in between the lots because they are also referred to as common areas. Ms. Dreyer asked Mr. Flores if this Draft Ordinance would only apply to the setbacks to public and private rights -of -way and exclude other types of common use areas. Mr. Flores stated that the current provisions state that you must maintain five feet on all sides including the pedestrian area. The proposed language allows the same setbacks for all lots regardless of whether you are adjacent to a common use areas or not. Ms. Dreyer asked Mr. Flores if the structure could abut the pedestrian walkway. Mr. Flores stated yes. Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 28 Ms. Dreyer asked Mr. Flores if this is what the residents want. Mr. Flores stated yes. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any further questions for Mr. Flores. At this time, Chairman Wesloski opened the public portion of the hearing. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone that would like to speak in favor of or in opposition to this Draft Ordinance. Ms. Zella Brown, unit owner at Nettles Island, addressed the Board. Ms. Brown stated that Nettles Island, Inc. is an entity of its own. She stated that they fall under Corporate Law 617 which is not for profit. She stated that they maintain their roads, they have their own garbage trucks, they are an entity of their own. She stated that their zoning is HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District). The County has allowed them to build single-family residences. Ms. Brown stated that she is one of fifty five unit owners who feel they are being penalized for owning three sided lots (which have been referred to as corner lots). They are asking that the County not condemn five feet of their property because they are next to a common use area, they are being taxed and they pay taxes to the County on their survey. She stated that at the time their Board ask for the five foot to be included in the Ordinance (96-010) they thought they would gain three feet, but they cannot build between structures, only to their survey. If they are deprived of five feet, either side, whether it is to the left or to the right, they are cut down five feet on their building space. Ms. Brown stated that the wording on page 3 of Draft Ordinance 99-017, paragraph (c), "five (5) feet from any common use area shall be required" should be stricken. She stated that she -is very concerned that the clarification of common use areas to refer to public or private road rights -of -way only, is bypassing the five foot they are being penalized for, because their land is near a common area. She stated that if she were to move her 1980 trailer to build a single-family residence, she would be penalized five foot of her property that she is paying taxes on. Ms. Brown stated that Nettles Island is referred to as a Recreational Vehicle Park. They are not. They fall under the County Ordinance of a Recreational Vehicle Park. They are zoned HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District). She is not sure how the roads and the right-of-ways were entered into this petition. Mr. Grande asked Ms. Brown if she would agree that Draft Ordinance 99-017 should be passed as presented by staff. Ms. Brown stated no. She would like the wording "five foot on either side of a common use area" deleted. She stated leave the words "right-of-way" as far as roads. She stated that their roads are private and they maintain them. She stated that the roads should not enter into this request for an Ordinance change at all. Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 29 Chairman Wesloski asked Mr. Flores if the Draft Ordinance is for St. Lucie County and not for Nettles Island is that why the wording "public and private rights -of -way" is included. Mr. Flores stated yes. Ms. Dreyer asked Ms. Brown if Nettles Island, Inc. has lot lines. Ms. Brown stated yes. Ms. Dreyer stated that the way she reads the last sentence in paragraph (c), side yard corner, is that the setbacks only apply in the absence of recorded lot lines. Ms. Brown stated that all residents have a survey on record. Ms. Dreyer asked Ms. Brown if Nettles Island, Inc. is a platted recorded lot line. Ms. Brown stated yes. Ms. Dreyer stated that Ms. Brown is requesting that the five feet from any common use area be deleted. She stated that she believes that only applies in the absence of recorded lot lines under this particular section of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, so it would not affect Nettles Island, Inc. Ms. Brown stated that it does affect Nettles Island, Inc. Mr. Kelly stated that paragraph (c) in Draft Ordinance 99-017 speaks to side yard comer lots. He stated that a comer lot is a lot that abuts a street. He believes we need to maintain distance from streets whether they are public or private, if there is vehicular use. The side corner section that has been referred to is intended to deal with streets. The objection is that it still maintains a five foot separation from common use areas. He stated that staff has re -defined common use areas in the note to specifically state they are public and private roads. Common use areas are not pedestrian walkways. Mr. Kelly stated that Ms. Dreyer is correct in that "in the absence of recorded lot lines" would apply to an RV Park that does not have lots. It may just have pads and is typically a rental park. In those cases, you need to maintain a minimum of eight feet unobstructed between adjacent units and you need to still be five feet from common use areas. Common use areas have been re -defined to be public and private roads and rights -of -way, they are not pedestrian. He does not see the conflict. Ms. Brown stated that they are having building permits turned down. Mr. Kelly stated that you will until this Draft Ordinance 99-017 is passed. Ms. Brown stated that they have one hundred and forty-one feet of waterfront area that does not have Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 30 1%W lft/ a walkway and Mr. Veach has lost three sales because of this clause. Mr. Kelly stated that staff tried to write Draft Ordinance 99-017 in very simple terms. If you have a lot line that is adjacent to anything other than a public or private right-of-way, then the rules are you can go zero feet or five feet depending on which side of the lot you are on. If you are adjacent to a public or private right-of-way (vehicular traffic) then you need to maintain the five feet. Ms. Dreyer asked Mr. Kelly if it would be possible to grant a variance to Nettles Island, Inc. as a whole and not amend the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Mr. Kelly stated that the variance procedure is intended to look at individual circumstances. He stated that Nettles Island, Inc. may not be able to meet all of the tests for a variance, i.e., hardship, uniqueness and the other issues that go with variances. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Kelly if the specific language that Ms. Brown is concerned with does not apply to Nettles Island, Inc. because their lots are platted. Mr. Kelly stated that is correct. It does not apply to Nettles Island, Inc. It would not apply to other parks similarly situated where there are pedestrian rights -of -way. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Kelly if leaving the language as presented by staff will have no affect whatsoever on Nettles Island, Inc. because their lots are platted. Mr. Kelly stated yes. Chairman Wesloski stated that she believes there is still some confusion regarding common areas. Mr. Kelly stated that the Note reads "Common use areas shall refer to public and private rights -of - ways only." He stated that when the term "common use area" we are talking about "roads" and not pedestrian areas. He stated that the intent of "lots adjacent to pedestrian access shall not be considered corner lots" is that corner lots are only those lots that are adjacent to roadways. Mr. Moore asked Mr. Kelly if the sentence could be reworded to "the common use areas shall not refer to pedestrian rights -of -way". Mr. Kelly stated that canals are considered common use areas. He would not want to place a structure up against a canal right-of-way in other RV Parks. Ms. Dreyer suggested using "roadways". Mr. Bill Deiters, President of the Board of Directors at Nettles Island, addressed the Board. Mr. Deiters stated that they would like the deletion of the present rule that states the owner to the right of a sidewalk must give up five feet of their property. Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 31 Mr. Deiters suggested that staff use "roads" and delete all language referring to common use areas. He stated that we cannot say "common use areas" because we have parking spaces next to bath houses that are next to a zero lot line side of a lot. He stated that if staff includes common use areas as roadways and parking spaces we cheat those residents out of five feet. He stated that if the wording "roadways" is used everything would be okay. As soon as you infringe upon common use areas you are going to hurt the residents next to the parking lot. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone else that would like to speak in favor of or in opposition to this Draft Ordinance. Mr. Mark Boston, Chairman for the Nettles Island Political Action, 579 Nettles Boulevard, Jensen Beach, addressed the Board. Mr. Boston stated that he has five letters from residents who are away or were not able to attend tonight. Mr. Veach and the Nettles Island Builder were also not available tonight. Mr. Boston stated that all the residents want is their five foot back on the sidewalk easements, so they can build their homes. He stated that there have been many homes built and double-wides put in over the years on the five foot. Last year this was stopped and many residents sold their lots. Many residents are waiting for this five foot piece of property next to the sidewalk easement to be dropped so they can build on the zero lot lines. Chairman Wesloski asked Mr. Boston if he would like to submit the five letters for the record. Mr. Boston stated yes. Ms. Young stated that she had an opportunity to speak with staff regarding the language in Draft Ordinance 99-017. Staff proposes the sentence in paragraph (c), side yard corner, "public and private rights -of -way" be changed to read "public and private roadways". This clears up the canal concerns raised by Ms. Brown. The same change should also be made in the Note. Ms. Young stated that the last sentence in the Note "Lots adjacent to pedestrian access shall not be considered comer lots" addresses a lot that has a street in front, and a sidewalk on the side. If you own a lot of this type rather than being a (c) side yard corner, you would be a (b) side yard, and because the lots in Nettles Island are recorded, you would have the eight feet unobstructed on the left side and zero on the right side, the same as your neighbors. Ms. Young stated that she believes these changes address the concerns of the residents here tonight. Changing the language from rights -of -way which could be considered as a canal, to roadways. The reason behind this was safety from vehicular traffic, then you allow someone on a canal to have the eight and zero foot consideration. Ms. Pat Miller, resident of Nettles Island and Condominium Manager, Jensen Beach, addressed the Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 32 Board. Ms. Miller stated that five feet may not sound like a lot, but these lots are thirty five feet wide, sixty five feet deep. If you take five feet away, you are talking a considerable amount of square footage when your building a home. With the new language that is being proposed, everyone will have equal use of their land, regardless of whether you are located next to the sidewalk. The residents who have a sidewalk, even with a zero lot line, end up with more than eight feet between their neighbor and their home. Ms. Miller stated that the current language states those RV lots that have not been platted. That should have excluded Nettles Island from the entire five foot issue. It very clearly stated unless there are no lot lines established, then the rule is put into play. As a result of the interpretation there are residents in this room who spent five hundred dollars in an attempt to obtain a variance and were denied. She does not believe the variance should have been required in the first place. The interpretation would indicate that Nettles Island should not have fallen under that particular paragraph. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone else that would like to speak in favor of or in opposition to this Draft Ordinance. Hearing no further arguments in favor of or in opposition to the petition, Chairman Wesloski closed the public portion of the hearing. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions or discussion. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Deiters if the language proposed by Ms. Young would specifically meet his concerns. Mr. Deiters stated yes. Chairman Wesloski asked what would be the pleasure of the Board. After considering the testimony presented during the public hearing, including staff comments, and the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, Mr. Grande moved that the Planning and Zoning Commission forward a recommendation of approval of Draft Ordinance 99-017, as amended by Ms. Young's comments to the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners because it meets all of the objectives of the residents and does not contradict anything that exists currently in the County. Mr. McCurdy seconded the motion. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was any discussion. Upon roll call, the motion was approved, 6-0. Chairman Wesloski stated that Draft Ordinance 99-017 would be forwarded to the Board of County Planning & Zoning Commission/ July 15, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 33 M M Commissioners with a recommendation of approval with the changes that were made in the motion. Planning & Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency July 15, 1999 Page 34 1,5, 1 .-.), DEPARTMENT (?k (Ulb3iVtiFNITY DEVELOPMENT Tw mailmi k, anti Losing; 0on-imigsion A1rern t'i�irirairx;� MariugeF {r� 1)ate: ,iui y 6, ! q99 `�'tr:b�t:t:t: ()raft (:lt�inanct; t7 t'7 - t'eti.fi��n of 7acqucler�t: Vearb;;--mmdingnf+ the St Lucie Cotuity .t~and Dcvelopmcnt Codc by Amoridinl Smhun 71 t U.16(Q)(). j(A)i i&. to provide for the clariitication ofcom non use arias to refer to p!Lblic or private road tS^4f-W y. (Pile Number. TA-99.003) Attachcd is a ropy of Drall Ordinance 99-017, wldch proposes %) amend Section 7,l0A6(Q)(Q(A)(1)((,), of the St, Lucie Cotmty I, nd Deve-torment l o4r (T,Dt: - This amend-nnerit would clarify the definition of common areas as used in Recreational Vehicle, Parks. Thl4 prL7powd MC amendment w&,q submitted by facquelene L. Veach in accordance with the prevision. of Section 11.00.01 of the Lilt'., This petition was not ialtlated by St. Iucic t'cr-tutty, aria is pwsuiited as proposed. J'(xe petitioner would itke to amcad the definition of common u-x areas as used in Src0wx 7.10.16(Q)(1)(Axl(c), to clarify that common uses areas should infer to public or private rights -of, way only when rucasuritig the txtbac ks fai- &U-ticturc.5 on sido ytirti carriers in rccrcationa) vehiclo parks. kocgular lots within RV Parks are considered to be zero lotline lots. The setbacks for these lets are a feet on the left side and U feet on the right side when facing the lot from the street. For lots which are adjacent to common use areas that arc utilirA ;far pedestrian access, the setback from the pedestrian access is a mirumum of 5 feet, regardless of whether the access is located on die left or ight side of thG lot.. I he petitioner it: proposing that the setbacks for all 'lots be the same for al l lasts, regardless of"whether or not there is a pedestrian access adjacent to the lot. The petitioner believes that the curwrit regulations of the LDC do not allow owners of -'lots in the Nettles Island development to fully utilize the space of their lots.. Iit xxgtking any wnendraent to they fRYT'of'the T and Development Code. consideration must. be ilium to the rainific ations that the. proposed change will have on the entire county and riot to .gust unc specific location. WWlc this use ritay be appmpriato for the Nettles Island devclopment, it may riot hM appropriate for all RV Parks in the cotuity. A tvvicw of the RV Parks on record in St. Lucre County and on South Hutchinson [eland in particular indicates that Nettles Isim.d is the tin.ly RV Park that has any cornnion use areas between lots. Therefore, the amendment to the LDC regulations would only directly affect the residents of Nettles Island. cm i 3 4y �J q 3 9 1 tJ 12 13 14 15 16 �7 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 7= 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 Ordinance #96-010a Draft 41 (ed) rear yard - + Note: The front yard setback for special situat-ion lots shall be five feet_ Special situation lots include those lots in which the longest property dimensiuii is found along the street frontage. For lots with double street frontage, the front yard shall be identified on the approved site plan of the particular Recreational Vehicle Park, which shall be kept on file with the Community Development Department. The front yard for a block of double frontage shall be consistent the len.c_rth of that block. Double frontage lots are not eligible for special situation consideration or. designation. Any deviation or change to the front yard designation that does not include-: the adjustment of the entire block shall only be approved by the Board of Adjustment in accordance with Section 10.01.00, 2. In all recreational vehicle parks created after August 1, 1990, including the -expansion of any existing recreational vehicle park. (a) front yard. - (b) side yard - c) Vide yard corner - twenty (20) feet t e n ( 1 0) f e e t tmebstrueted etwczTi Double Underline is for addition f ^ is for deletion Pagr_ 43 PRINT DATE: 3/01/96 1 0 W 0 J J r� M M 0 i 2 3 4 c� 7 9 10 1.1 J 1.3 1.4 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24. 26 27 28 29 30 31 :32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 PARAGRAPHS 3 THROUGH 9 •--- NO CHANGE *"!c * * * * k *. * * * * * * * k * * ** * * *,A * * * * * * * * * 7.10.00 SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS 7.10.16 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS Q , PERMITTED SPECIFIC USES AND ADDITIONS 1. Any Recreational Vehicle Park, occupying more than t-.en (10) acres, unless located on North or South irui:chinson Tsl_a.nd where there shall be no minimum ac '�.7c requirement other than that set out in, Se.Ct i{'11 7.1.0.19 (C) , is permitted to have installed, sarect-ed, constructed or otherwise placed on site Recreational Vehicles, Travel Trailers, Detached Single Pamily Residences, Class A Mobile Homes and additions thereto,' including wood decks, screen rooms, patios and like accessory facilities subject to the following requirements: a._ 1. The following minimum yard requirements shall be maintained: in all recreational vehicle parks existing on or before August 1, 1990. Ordinance 09G-01-0a Draft #1 (a) front yard - (b) side yard - - side yard corner - c ten (1.0) feet. * eightt. ( a ) feet �*Ftite ; and - eight foot left sid.' and. five 5 too; icffit side wen facin thy__- r. o�m t e center of thc_* main _street _ f.rontaae inc .0 es aaZ���ro�er_t, e adjacent to commait- u -.e Double Underline is for addition - - r+is for deletion Pare 42 PRINT DATE: 3i01/J6 E H 0 0 �(Y ,a N 0 Ul I cm )" (I,,- / () / / � � � 3J SS Qr( �^^� 'lh. �F3 y6 cm C. JACK SAVAGE 1766 NATIONAL ROAD WHEELING, WEST VIRGINIA 26003 July 13, 1999 Mr. Mark Boston 579 Nettles Blvd. Jensen Beach, Florida 34957 To Whom It May Concern: I own Lot 778 and would like to build a house on it. At the present time, the 5' off -set adjacent to a public walkway, is preventing me from building the house that I had designed. I hope the 5' set back can be eliminated. Very truly yours, GGC G t/ C. J ck Savage CJS/ram on July 15, 1999 Ref Meeting on Nettles Island, 7 p.m. July 15, 1999 Attn: Hank Florez , I live at 965 Nettles Blvd. Jensen Beach, Fl. My lot's zero lot line is adjacent to the sidewalk. I paid a premium price for this unit because of its location and size. Should you take an additional 5 ft. on this side, and I be forced to rebuild at some point, it would not just take 175 sq. ft. of living area; but because of the triangular shape of the lot, and building restrictions already in place, my lot would be unbuildable. Please reconsider this move. It is unfair! Sincerely, Margie Torgersen - ^ ~ `�` `` ' hw�' �m�/ - h 11 1 ;moo Thom '��- m.�sncvr , J-30 a W— `1`�a$,.Q_ iarn� �_vJe bo-- _ U VMQ—e -tt"O%- - . oc--Siee�_ cr.,-r._cnp_o _ cqw--- � k- _. _ ___ ---__---�.c�. _��►�w.x�c� ..-` �`��_.._p. i�-cs`te_ U.i2_e�J�e�-_��5'C�c�A-Q�___ -- No/ AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1999 6: 00 P.M. Consider Draft Ordinance 99-017, Petition of Jacquelene E. Veach amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending Section Z10.16(q)(1)(a)(1)(c), to provide for the clarification of common use areas to refer to public or private road rights -of -way only. If it becomes necessary, these public hearings maybe continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If aperson decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testing during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on August 5,1999. FILE NO. ORD-99-017 NOTICE OF ESTABLISHMENT " OR CHANGE OF REGULATION AFFECTINGTHE USE OF LAND The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners propose to adopt the following Ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 99-017 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 7.10.16(Q)(1)(a)(1)(c), TO PROVIDE FOR THE CLARIFICATION OF COMMON USE AREAS TO REFER TO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROAD RIGHTS -OF -WAY; BY PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISION, BY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY, PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE,' PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION. A PUBLIC HEARING on Ordinance 99-017 will be held before the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, August 17, 1999, at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the County Administration Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL.. Matters affecting your personal and property rights may be heard and acted upon. All interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Written comments received .in advance of the public hearing will also be heard. The purpose of this public hearing is to amend the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by clarifying that common use areas as used in Section 7.10.16(Q)(1)(a)(1)(c) refers to public or private road right-of- way only. This is the first of two required public hearings. The second public hearing on these proposed amendments will be held on September 7, 1999. Notification of this second hearing will be published prior to the meeting. If any person decides to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter considered at the meetings or hearings of any board, committees, commissions, agency, council or advisory group, that person will need record of the proceedings and that, for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made,, which record should include the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. This notice dated and executed this 2nd day of August, 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ Paula A. Lewis, Chairman PUBLISH DATE: August 5, 1999 M cm NOTICE OF ESTABLISHMENT OR CHANGE OF REGULATION AFFECTING THE USE OF LAND The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners propose to adopt the following Ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 99-017 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 7.10.16(0)(1)(a)(1)(c), TO PROVIDE FOR THE CLARIFICATION OF COMMON USE AREAS TO REFER TO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROAD RIGHTS -OF -WAY; BY PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISION, BY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR APPLICABIL- ITY, PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, PROVIDING FOR ADOP- TION AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION. A PUBLIC HEARING on Ordinance 99-017 will be held before the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, August 17, 1999, at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the County Administration Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL. Matters affecting your personal and property rights may be heard and acted upon. All interested per- sons are invited to attend and be heard. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be heard. The purpose of this public hearing is to amend the St. Lucie +.County Land Development Code by clarifying that common use areas as used in Section 7.10.16(Q)(1)(a)(1)(c) refers to public or private road right-of- way only. This is the first of two required public hearings. The second public hearing on these proposed amendments will be held on September 7, 1999. Notification.of this second hearing will be published prior to the meeting. If any person decides to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter considered at the meetings or hearings of any board,"commit- tees, commissions, agency, council or advisory group, that person will. need record of the proceedings and that, for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record should include the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. This notice dated and executed this 2nd day of August, 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ Paula A. Lewis, Chairman PUBLISH DATE: August 5, 1999 *40, 'r✓ PLANNING AND ZONING REVIEW: July 15, 1999 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Planning and Zoning Commission From: Planning Manager Date: July 6, 1999 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-017 - Petition of Jacquelene E. Veach amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by Amending Section 7.10.16(Q)(1)(A)(1)(c), to provide for the clarification of common use areas to refer to public or private road rights -of -way only. (File Number: TA-99-003) Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 99-017, which proposes to amend Section 7.10.16(Q)(1)(A)(1)(c), of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code (LDC). This amendment would clarify the definition of common areas as used in Recreational Vehicle Parks. This proposed LDC amendment was submitted by Jacquelene E. Veach in accordance with the provision of Section 11.00.01 of the LDC. This petition was not initiated by St. Lucie County, and is presented as proposed. The petitioner would like to amend the definition of common use areas as used in Section 7.10.16(Q)(1)(A)(1(c), to clarify that common uses areas should refer to public or private rights -of - way only when measuring the setbacks for structures on side yard comers in recreational vehicle parks. Regular lots within RV Parks are considered to be zero lot line lots. The setbacks for these lots are 8 feet on the left side and 0 feet on the right side when facing the lot from the street. For lots which are adjacent to common use areas that are utilized for pedestrian access, the setback from the pedestrian access is a minimum of 5 feet, regardless of whether the access is located on the left or right side of the lot. The petitioner is proposing that the setbacks for all lots be the same for all lots, regardless of whether or not there is a pedestrian access adjacent to the lot. The petitioner believes that the current regulations of the LDC do not allow owners of lots in the Nettles Island development to fully utilize the space of their lots. In making any amendment to the TEXT of the Land Development Code, consideration must be given to the ramifications that the proposed change will have on the entire county and not to just one specific location. While this use may be appropriate for the Nettles Island development, it may not be appropriate for all RV Parks in the county. A review of the RV Parks on record in St. Lucie County and on South Hutchinson Island in particular indicates that Nettles Island is the only RV Park that has any common use areas between lots. Therefore, the amendment to the LDC regulations would only directly affect the residents of Nettles Island. M 0 July 15, 1999 Petition: Jacquelene Veach Page 2 File No.: TA-99-001 Staff has reviewed the request and recommends approval of a change to the text of the LDC which would clarify the definition of common uses areas to refer to public or private rights -of -way only. Please let us know if you have any questions. hf cc: Jacquelene E. Veach Ted Oakes File �%✓ cm 1 I ORDINANCE 99-017 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 7. 10.16 (Q) (1) (a) (1) (c) , TO PROVIDE FOR THE CLARIFICATION OF COMMON USE AREAS TO REFER TO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE ROAD RIGHTS -OF -WAY; BY PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISION, BY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY, PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determination: 1. On August 1, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, adopted the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 2. The Board of County Commissioners adopted certain amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, through the following Ordinances: _ 91-03 - March 14, 1991 91-09 - May 14, 1991 91-21 - November 7, 1991 92-17 - June 2, 1992 93-01 - February 16, 1993 93-03 - February 16, 1993 93-05 - May 25, 1993 93-06 - May 25, 1993 93-07 - May 25, 1993 94-07 - June 22, 1994 94-18 - August 16, 1994 94-21 - August 16, 1994 95-01 - January 10, 1995 95-02 - February 21, 1995 96-10 - August 6, 1996 97-01 - March 4, 1997 97-09 - October 7, 1997 97-23 - September 2,1997 98-01 - February 2,1999 3. On July 15,1999, the Local Planning Agency/Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance after publishing notice in the Port St. Lucie News and Tribune at least 10 days prior to the hearing and recommended that the proposed ordinance be approved. ------------------------------------------------- Do1h tad xlin- is for addition Strike Thrnnah is for deletion Ordinance 99-017 1st Draft Page 1 Print Date: 07/08/99 M 1 4. On 199 , this Board held, its first public 2 hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishing a 3 notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and 4 Tribune on 199. 5 6 S. On 199_, this Board held its second public 7 hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishing a 8 notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and 9 Tribune on 199. 10 11 6. The proposed amendment to the St. Lucie County Land 12 Development Code is consistent with the general purpose, 13 goals, objectives, and standards of the St. Lucie County 14 Comprehensive Plan and is in the best interest of the 15 health, safety, and public welfare of the citizens of St. 16 Lucie County, Florida. 17 18 19 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners 20 of St. Lucie County, Florida: 21 22 PART A. 23 24 SPECIFIC AMENDMENTS TO THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE 25 CAUSING THE CODE TO READ AS FOLLOWS, INCLUDE: 26 27 28******************************** 29 30 31 CHAPTER VII 32 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT 33 STANDARDS 34 35 3 6 7.10.00 SUPPLEMENTAL STANDARDS 37 38 39 7.10.16 RECREATIONAL VEHICLE PARKS ------------------------------------------------- Do�hl Und line is for addition Strike Through is for deletion Ordinance 99-017 Page 2 1st Draft Print Date: 07/08/99 M rM PARAGRAPHS A THROUGH Q (1) (A) (1) (A) : NO CHANGES (b) side yard - eight (8) feet unobstructed on the left side and zero (0) feet on the right side when facing the lot from the center of the main street frontage. In the absence of recorded lots lines, a minimum eight (8) feet unobstructed between adjacent units shall be required. (c) side yard corner - eight (8) foot left side and five (5) foot right side when facing the lot from the center of the main street frontage (includes all properties adjacent to common 1714P areas publ i c and 12rivate ri clhts-of- wav). In the absence of recorded lot lines, a minimum eight (8) feet unobstructed between adjacent units and five (5) feet from any common use area shall be required. (d) rear yard - five (5) feet. Note: The front yard setback for special situation lots shall be five feet. Special situation lots include those lots in which the longest property dimension is found along the street frontage. Common +a a eaa shall refer to n+uilic and nrivate rights-of-wav only. Ln_ts adiacent to nedestr;_an acr_esG shall not ho nnnni(iPrPd cornto a. For lots with double street frontage, the front yard shall be identified on the approved site plan of the particular Recreational Vehicle Park, which shall be kept on file with the Community Development Department. The front yard for a block of double frontage shall be consistent the length of that block. Double frontage lots are not eligible for special situation consideration or designation. Any deviation or change to the front yard designation that does not include the adjustment of the entire block shall only be approved by the Board of Adjustment in accordance with Section 10.01.00. PARAGRAPHS Q (1) (A) (2 ) THROUGH Q (2) : NO CHANGES PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances and ------------------------------------------------- Do+h inderlin is for addition Strike Through is for deletion ordinance 99-017 Page 3 1st Draft Print Date: 07/08/99 **all *40/ .County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY. If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable throughout St. Lucie County's jurisdiction. PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk be and is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART F. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon adoption of the Board of County Commissioners. PART G. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis XXX Vice -Chairman John D. Bruhn XXX ------------------------------------------------- nrn,hle Underline is for addition $trr;ke Through is for deletion ordinance 99-017 Page 4 1st Draft Print Date: 07/08/99 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 `✓ `rr# Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX PART H. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be re -numbered or re -lettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that Parts B through H shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ENACTED this ATTEST: - DEPUTY CLERK hf H:\WP\ORD\99-017 day of , 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Do ihl P TTndPrjL= is for addition Rtrikr Thrrn,Th is for deletion Ordinance 99-017 1st Draft Page 5 Print Date: 07/08/99 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ISM NO. 4G DATE: 08/17/99 CONSENT [ REGULAR [ PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg.[ ] Quasi-Jud. [X] PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Community Development Direc or SUBJECT: Request for Rezoning of Property located on the north side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet west of Rock Road from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District - Draft Resolution 99-134. BACKGROUND: Petition of Eckerd Youth Alternatives for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District. The stated purpose of the rezoning is to allow for an educational service and facility. (File No.: RZ-99-017/CU-99-003) PREVIOUS ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 5 to 0 with 4 members absent (Chairman Wesloski, Mr. Trias, Mr. Moore, and Mr. Matthes), recommended approval of the rezoning at its June 17, 1999, meeting. On July 20, 1999, the Board of County Commissioner discussed the matter and continued the public hearing to August 17, 1999 in order to seek additional information. The requested information is attached. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Draft Resolution 99-134 changing the zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for property located on the north side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet west of Rock Road. [ VJ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: 3-2 County Attorney: _ i7 Originating Department: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Review and Approvals Management 6 Budget: Other: xas M. Anderson ty Administrator Purchasing: Other: ,%me *410 COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-134 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Community Development Director Date: August 10, 1999 Subject: Petition of Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc., for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District. (File No.: RZ-99-017/CU-99-003) The proposed rezoning of property located on the north side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet west of Rock Road from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District. The change in zoning is to allow for the establishment of an Educational Service and Facility which is permitted, by Conditional Use, upon approval of the Board of County Commissioners. At the June 17, 1999, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 5 to 0 with four members absent, recommended approval of this petition as set forth in Draft Resolution 99-134. This proposed rezoning meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. At the July 20, 1999 public hearing, the Board of County Commissioners discussed the matter and continued the public hearing until August 17, 1999 in order to seek additional information. Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc., has provided an analysis of other parcels considered (see attachment). Staff recommends the approval of this petition for a change in zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) as set forth in Draft Resolution 99-134. This hearing will be followed by a hearing on the request for the referenced Conditional Use. SUBMITTED: Julia Shewchuk, AICP Community Development Director ct cc: Daniel Arroyo File 9M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 s 9 10 11 RESOLUTION 99-134 FILE NO.: RZ-99-017/CU-99-003 A RESOLUTION GRANTING A CHANGE IN ZONING FROM THE CG (CONMMRCIAL, GENERAL) ZONING DISTRICT TO THE I (INSTITUTIONAL) ZONING DISTRICT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. F.ckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc,.. presented a petition for a change in zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the property described below. 2. On June 17, 1999, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County Commissioners approve the hereafter described request for a change in zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the property described below. 3. On July 20, 1999, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 feet of the subject property. 4. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the requirements of Section 11.06.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 5. The proposed change in zoning is consistent with the existing and proposed use of property in the surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: A. The proposed change in the Zoning District Classification for that property described as follows: File No.: RZ-99-017 August 10, 1999 Resolution 99-134 Page 1 cm THE WEST FIVE ACRES OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY. SECTION 11, TOWNSHIP 35, RANGE 39 WEST 1/4 OF SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 LESS SOUTH 54 FEET OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA (Tax ID#: 2311-242-0000-000/5). CONTAINING 10.25 ACRES. (Location: North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet west of Rock Road.) owned by Jay D. Moran, is hereby changed from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District. B. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the change to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis XXX Vice -Chairman John D. Bruhn XXX Commissioner Frances Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 17' Day of August 1999. ATTEST: Deputy Clerk Ct HAWMECKERMONINGRESOLUTION/ File No.: RZ-99-017 August 10, 1999 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney Resolution 99-134 Page 2 Aug-lo-99 05:26A daniel arroyo 407 977-1669 p.O2 0 M Scribner Construction 1050 Bob White Trail Chuluota, Florida 32766 August 10, 1999 St. Lucie County County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Ref. File Number CU-99-003 File Number RZ-99-017 Dear Commissioners; In order to address the question about alternative sites that was raised at the July 20 meeting, I have complied a listing of the various properties that have been considered. This list shows the positive and negative attributes of each parcel as well as our recommendations. I believe that a review of this list will clearly show that every reasonable effort has been made to find an appropriate site for the Eckerd Leadership Program, ELP. The selection of the property at 8500 Orange Avenue Extension was based on a careful review of many properties over a six month time table. The ELP program has served 181 youth since it opened in February of 1997. The total number of St. Lucie County youth served to date is 108 or W10 of all the youth served. Currently there are 27 youth in the program with 18 of those or 67% being from St. Lucie County. On the current waiting list for the program there are 11 youth, of these 8 or 73% are from St. Lucie County. These numbers clearly show that St. Lucie County is benefiting considerably from this program and that there is a real need within the community for this program. See attached list for comparison by City and County. Please remember that our re -zoning request is for a 30 youth non-residential program. There was some confusion on this point in a local newspaper after the July 20s' meeting. With the Conditional Use requirements recommended by County Staff, I believe that the issues and concerns expressed by the neighbors concerning an Institutional zoning designation are well addressed within the Conditional Use stipulations. This is not an open ended zoning change as they fear. I hope that this information along with certain financial information that will be presented to you on August 17, will avail you as to the benefits of having this program in St. Lucie County. Thank you in advance for your consideration and time spent in this matter. Zel y, P. Arroyo 0 cm £O'd 6991-LL6 LOft QJCQ�A.AV IOLUVP tf9Z=S0 66-0I-6nV �.r 0 N a O C. C a, a, Z wa c x O� a x � N Q3 d 00 a tPO'd 699I-LL6 LOb OXoaae I81Uep V9Zz90 66-0I-6nV r Aug-10-99 05:27A daniel arroyo �. w _407 977-1669 P_05 Cm Cm UP Cities FACT COUNT(-) CITY LP02 2 Fellsmere LP02 74 Ft. Pierce LP02 2 G►iford LP02 2 Hobe Sound LP02 4 Jensen Beach LP02 1 Lake Worth LP02 t Palm City LP02 34 Port St. Lucie LP02 25 glued LP02 1 Titusvive LP02 33 Vero Beach LP02 2 1 RIO County Total Indian River 37 St Lucie 108 Martin 32 Other 4 TOTAL 181 kids served *Mop" 2097 80'% of all youth served: St Lucie County youth Pape f -6401-Z 4 Y p O C a O Y C � OW 0 o u Io > <J J 0) > -' a I N F gyp, ' e e E Z 4 ° o G V p d L � U a)_� N` va -i� � M Mom• ° g P P C, f C a a n C 15 PARK . ON r Q lopolm at P W yam.. _ W a a v.Aco - - !— ow Z w2" D OM KLRS13XW O U � OM N.a O awe 3.l 35M U w > W y � C: W omvw wn W y 5 -kn, 0 VVOV MLWY3 O c W VVW) Z O yr W i � W �( n S K K fl- S K L S SE L S 9f L ,11Nf100 3380H333>10 °b Oy Zoning Ecl Youth Alternativinc. ----, CO CN M-11 0 0 0 U AG-1 AR -1 0° 0 RZ 99-017 C Community Development N Geographic Information Systems Map revised May 21,1999 ,�..-V ~t- b—� b 0 1 ft ..� .m..,. N bft"w m Po tft.4lY no FW,tlW fora r • bPW OY,6p d-rt Land Use EcC,,, ,;d Youth Alternatives Inc. RU West Avenue "E" s b l eo Q e 9 m r In u I N /J 2 Moco Lone — JI 116 1 71 f1 9 p o / I m 0 I 1 1 T 0 .0 tt l /J N I 6 I 16 1 O I 0� a 3n 00 u O West Avenue "C" f JD cr c J j 4 �I 6 c e Jr 41 I Jr MXD — 6 M West Avenue "B" s J, range e a — J 4 U 21 t I t I J * I I O I I 1 Millwood Drive ---------------- AV' - ---- ran a Avenue — -------- --- 0 0 TiU RU 0 E5 PUBLIC HEARING - ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC. FILE NO. RZ-99-017 Ms. Cheryl Thole presented staff comments. Ms. Thole stated that she was presenting the petition of Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc. for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District. The subject property is 10.25 acres and is located at 8500 Orange Avenue Extension which is on the north side of Orange Avenue and approximately 1,000 feet west of Rock Road. Ms. Thole stated that the surrounding zoning to the subject property is U (Utilities) to the south. I (Institutional) to the north and east. AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) to the west, with a nonconforming subdivision of which several lots have been changed to RS-4 (Residential, Single - Family - 4 du/acre). Ms. Thole stated that the surrounding land uses are T/U (Transportation Utilities) to the south. PF (Public Facilities) to the north and east. RU (Residential Urban) to the west. There are several I (Institutional) uses in the area. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is COM (Commercial). Ms. Thole stated that Eckerd Youth Alternatives is an educational service. This use requires a Conditional Use Permit, which will be considered tonight as an accompanying petition. Ms. Thole stated that staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms with the standards of review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff is, therefore recommending that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Chairman McCurdy asked if there were any questions for staff. At this time, Chairman McCurdy opened the public portion of the hearing. Chairman McCurdy asked if there was anyone from the public who would like to speak on this issue. Mr. George Young, Vice President of Operations for Eckerd Youth Alternatives, addressed the Board. Mr. Young thanked the Board for the opportunity to present their need for the property to be rezoned. He stated that Eckerd Youth Alternatives is a non-profit organization which started in 1968. They operate residential and non-residential programs. He stated that one of their better programs is the one in Fort Pierce, which has been operating since 1996. He stated that this program would be a non-residential program that would serve a maximum of 30 students between the ages of 13 and 18. These students are first time offenders, many who are local to the City and the County. Planning & Zoning Commission/ June 17, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 8 He stated that their current site has been sold and they need to move to a new site by August 30, 1999. Juvenile Justice provides a review of the program on a regular basis and he read a statement from Juvenile Justice that stated an all site review was conducted and the performance rating deemed it satisfactory. Mr. Young stated that this is a good program that will continue to assist youth in the area for years and that he hopes this Board will approve their petition. He stated that there are various people present tonight who will be able to provide any other information that the Board may require. Chairman McCurdy asked if there were any questions from the Board. Ms. Shelly Owens, 124 Corinne Road, Fort Pierce, addressed the Board. Ms. Owens stated that her lot is the nonconforming lot that is located within the residential area to the west of the site. She stated that there is not a Jean Road that appears on the GIS maps and therefore, this site is directly against her backyard. She stated that she is opposed to this petition as it will be for juvenile offenders. She stated that there is an area that is located to the east of the subject property that she believes has been rezoned from Institutional to Utilities. Mr. Hank Flores said that he believes that an area may have been rezoned to Utilities to allow for a telecommunications tower at one time, but he is not exactly sure where it is located. Ms. Owens asked why it was rezoned Utilities if there was an Institutional use within there instead of directly adjacent to their residential area. Ms. Owens stated that she wanted to go on record as being opposed to the change in zoning for the subject property. Chairman McCurdy asked if there was anyone else who would like to speak on this issue. Mr. Arthur Pratt, 8670 West Avenue B, Fort Pierce, addressed the Board. Mr. Pratt stated that he has owned his property for 19 years and when the St. Lucie County jail was built in the area, the County Commissioners promised to keep an agriculture buffer zone. He stated that the first 2.5 acres of the property was Commercial and he would like to know when the back half of the property was changed. He stated that he is concerned about who will be responsible for paying for the EPA clean- up that is needed. Mr. Ralph Oakey, 124 Corinne Road, Fort Pierce, addressed the Board. Mr. Oakey stated that his property is 30 feet off the property line. He stated that they just had a difficult time with a bus company that used to occupy the lot which made it undesirable to live there. He stated that the area that is located between the jail and the Emergency Operations Center is currently Institutional and he was wondering why Eckerd Youth Alternatives could not operate in this area. He believes that it would be more reasonable. He stated that the area in which they live is going to be developed. He does not think that it will be easy to develop and sell this land if this use is put in. Mr. Ben Robinson, 4804 Matanzas Avenue, Fort Pierce, addressed the Board. Mr. Robinson stated that he serves as Deputy to the Juvenile Justice Manager for the Department of Juvenile Justice. He Planning & Zoning Commission/ June 17, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 9 *4✓ VANO stated that he is sensitive to the concerns of the neighboring residents. Eckerd Youth Alternatives would like to be good neighbors. He stated that the program will run during typical school hours and there will be no one on the property at night. He said that they have been good neighbors with the residents on Atlantic Avenue. Chairman McCurdy asked Mr. Robinson if he had stated that this would be a strictly daytime operation. Mr. Robinson stated that it is a daytime program. He stated that the students are bussed in and out. Mr. Merritt asked Mr. Robinson if they would be bussing the students. Mr. Robinson stated that there are vans which they use to pick-up the students. Mr. Merritt asked Mr. Robinson if parents would be transporting any of the children. Mr. Robinson stated that the program picks the students up from their homes and at the end of the day brings them home. Mr. Merritt asked Mr. Robinson if the individuals have felony records. Mr. Robinson stated that there may be some and the offenses are minor. He stated that Juvenile Justice runs several programs, the most severe being a level 10 which is a residential program, a level eight, six, and four are residential programs as well. He stated that a level two is one in which the Court will attempt to give a youngster another chance to work with the community. Mr. Merritt asked Mr. Robinson if there would be security on site. Mr. Robinson stated that there will be staff present to make sure that the rules and regulations are imposed. Chairman McCurdy thanked Mr. Robinson. Ms. Shelly Owens, 124 Corrine Road, Fort Pierce, addressed the Board. Ms. Owens stated that she did not have the opportunity to see a site plan for this and is not aware as to the type of buffer that is being proposed for the site. She asked that this be considered when making their decision on the rezoning. Ms. Dreyer asked Mr. Flores if this would have to come back as a Conditional Use. Mr. Hank Flores stated that the next agenda item is the Conditional Use petition for this property. He stated that a decision on the rezoning must be made first. He stated that conditions could be decided at that time. Planning & Zoning Commission/ June 17, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 10 „d `too Ms. Owens asked Mr. Flores what a Conditional Use is. Mr. Flores stated that a Conditional Use is a use that you can have on a property subsequent to Board of County Commission approval. He stated that certain limits and numbers of hours can be set, etc. Ms. Owens asked Ms. Young if this hearing is so, one can move forward with the plan before they go before the Board of County Commissioners. Ms. Young stated that there are two hearings for each of these agenda items. She stated that this Board is a recommending body to the Board of County Commissioners who makes the final decision. Ms. Owens asked Mr. Kelly if it has been established whether or not the entire property is designated as Commercial. Mr. Kelly stated that the information came from maps of the County and he does not remember if one of the areas was changed. Mr. Pratt stated that the prior owner said that the front 2.5 acres is zoned Commercial. Mr. Kelly stated that staff will research this before the Board of County Commission meeting. Ms. Owens stated that the data is incomplete regarding this area. Mr. Kelly stated that he believes there is complete information and that the entire property is CG (Commercial, General) at this time. NOTE: Ms. Shewchuk left the meeting to check the zoning records. When she returned, she confirmed that the entire site was zoned CG (Commercial, General). Mr. Merritt asked Mr. Kelly if someone could explain where the roads are and where the buildings sit in reference to the property. Mr. Kelly suggested to Mr. Merritt that he discuss that information in the Conditional Use and to only deal with issues that pertain to the rezoning at this time. Mr. Dale Johnson, who is employed by Irene Reese Realtors, 2401 West Midway Road, Fort Pierce, addressed the Board. Mr. Johnson stated that they represent approximately twenty property owners in the Jay Gardens subdivision. He stated that Institutional zoning would probably be more desirable than Commercial zoning providing there is a good buffer, a good building style, and the aesthetics are pleasing. He stated that he would like to have more information on the proposed area to report to the land owners that he is represents. He believes this would be a good use for the property. He questioned the property to the north of the subject area and to the east as well. Planning & Zoning Commission/ June 17, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 11 \.r '"o Mr. Kelly stated that he believes the specifics of the use and the site plan of the building should be discussed when the Conditional Use is addressed. He believes it is more appropriate to only question material dealing with the rezoning at this time. He stated that the intent is to renovate the existing building. The children will be bussed in each day and they are not allowed to use their own cars. It is a daytime program with children who are first time offenders. He stated that staff looked at the current site and that it did not seem to be a problem. Mr. Johnson stated that he is particularly concerned with a buffer that would go along Jean Road. Chairman McCurdy asked if there was anyone else who would like to speak on this issue. Ms. Diane Burton, Program Supervisor for Prevention Education for Children Homes Society, addressed the Board. Ms. Burton stated that they have worked with Eckerd Youth for approximately three years and that she believes that the program is exemplary. She stated that the children are strictly supervised and that these are kids with hope. She stated that this program needs this parcel for their facility. Mr. James H. Brown, 5200 Matanzas Avenue, Fort Pierce, addressed the Board. Mr. Brown stated that he is the Executive Director for Project ROCK (Reaching Our Community Kids), and they have been involved with the Eckerd Youth program. He stated that the kids come to the church, they clean and work with the church in their various activities. He stated that the Eckerd Youth kids are very well mannered, they got off track, and are working their way back. He stated that he understands the concerns of the neighbors. He hopes this Board will vote in favor of this rezoning to give Eckerd Youth the opportunity to continue their services to the County. Mr. Gerald Mitchell, Senior Counselor at Eckerd Youth, addressed the Board. Mr. Mitchell stated that there are kids that recently graduated in the area and have received scholarships to local colleges. He stated that he thought this would be a great opportunity for the kids and the community and they hope to be able to continue their service. Mr. Dennis Raulerson stated that he has a daughter in the program and it is a good program. He believes that Eckerd Youth is a great service to the kids. Ms. Fran Crivett, Treatment Coordinator at Eckerd Youth, addressed the Board. Ms. Crivett stated that she wanted to let the Board know that the program is like a family. She stated that she never has had any concern about whether the kids would do anything wrong and if something were to happen she believes that the staff is strong and will work things out immediately. Chairman McCurdy asked if there was anyone else who would like to speak on this issue. Ms. Eve Martile stated that her son was in the program and she understands the concerns of the residents. She stated that Eckerd Youth was better for him than the public schools. She stated that she supports this program. Planning & Zoning Commission/ June 17, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 12 ,%NW 140 Vernon, a previous student of Eckerd Youth, addressed the Board. Vernon stated that Eckerd Youth helped him get back on track in dealing with his anger management and how to communicate with his family. It is a good program. Mr. Sandy Mack, Supervisor at Eckerd Youth, addressed the Board. He stated that kids need therapy and if Eckerd Youth is not able to function, the kids would be without help that they really need. He stated that he sympathizes with the residents. Mr. (unintelligible) stated that he has been with Eckerd Youth for three years and that they need the support of the community to continue the program. Chairman McCurdy asked if there was anyone else who would like to speak on this issue. Hearing no further arguments in favor or in opposition to Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc., Chairman McCurdy closed the public portion of the hearing. Mr. Kelly stated that Ms. Shewchuk had checked the County records and in December of 1985 the entire 10 acres was zoned Commercial. Chairman McCurdy thanked Mr. Kelly for the information. Chairman McCurdy asked if there was any discussion among the Board. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Kelly about Jean Road and what kind of access exists to the residential properties along Jean Road. Mr. Pratt stated that road does not exist. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Kelly if there was a right-of-way for Jean Road. Mr. Kelly stated yes. Mr. Dale Johnson, who is employed by Irene Reese Realtors, 2401 West Midway Road, Fort Pierce, addressed the Board. Mr. Johnson stated that he had some information on this issue. In 1958, the Jay Gardens subdivision was accepted and put on file. Since then only a few homes have been built and the County has not done much work in that area. Chairman McCurdy asked if there was any other questions for staff. Chairman McCurdy asked Mr. Kelly if going from a CG (Commercial, General) Zoning to an I (Institutional) Zoning is considered a down zoning. Mr. Kelly stated that in general, he would say yes. There are generally less intense uses in I (Institutional) than in CG (Commercial, General). Planning & Zoning Commission/ June 17, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 13 09 Cn Chairman McCurdy asked Mr. Kelly if trucking operations would have been permitted in that area. Mr. Kelly stated that trucking operations are a permitted use. Chairman McCurdy asked if there was any discussion from the Board. Chairman McCurdy asked what was the pleasure of the Board. After considering the testimony presented during the public hearing, including staff comments, and the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.06.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, Mr. Merritt moved that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to the application of Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc., for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District. Ms. Dreyer seconded the motion, and upon roll call the motion was approved 5-0. Planning & Zoning Commission/ June 17, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 14 1 l_. ONJ 1 tll • KC H{_ I IJK. Jt7 J(/ 7Y 7u 7GY 1 . ci a {/11NK \� June 9; L999 To; St. :.ucie County Planning and Zoning Commission 23((! Virginia Avenue Ft. :fierce, F1. 34982-5652 Frome Tacy and Frank Bastek (%viers: Jay Gardens Lots 12,13,14,21,22 Blk 3 and Lot 38, Blk 6 Please ha advised that we are against a change in zoning from CG to I fir the property in file number RZ 99-017, North side of Orange jkvenue, approx. 1,000 feet west of Rock Road. We are also against a Conditional Use Permit to allow "Educational Services" in the-'( Zoning District for the property in file number cU 99-003. The pr.i-perty in question is right next to the Jay Gardens Sub -Division which zoned residential and has already suffered from'owered values. because of the jail which was built near there. We have! heard that entity calling itself "Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc." cil actually be a school and center for rehab of delinquents. We don t: feel that should be next door to a residential area. Jay Garden.t has the potential to be a place where an average family will find a'i'ordable housing, and that is needed more in that area than this school. Surely a more appropriate location for that use can be fou 0 than next door to a residential area. In goof conscience, commissioners, you might ask yourselves if this is soon?f:hing you would want next door -'to you. - Very t :t:ly yours, Mary a: i1`.. Frank Bastek 18031 ::ii scayne Blvd. Avenuu--:.., Fl. 33160 1 JUN 1 4 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ST. LUCIE COUNTY FL . fir/ ('ri June 1(, 1999 TO: St Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission 231() Virginia Avenue Ft: Pierce, Fl. 34982-5652 From: ;oseph Prussiano and Corinne Richardson Ivners: Jay Gardens - Bik 1 Lots 3,4,5,6,7,8 Blk 3 Lots 15,16,17,18 & 29 Blk 4 Lots 5,6,7,14,15 Blk 5 Lots 6,7,8,9,14,15,16,17,18 Blk 6 Lots 4,5,8,9,10 We are ;.gainst a change in zoning from CG to I for the property in fil(! number RZ 99-017, North side of Orange Avenue, approx. 1,000 :'r.!et west of Rock Road. We are also against a conditional use pertt(it to allow "Educational Service" in the I zoning .listrict for thi = property in file number CU 99--003 . The va..taes in Jay Gardens are already low and made even lower by having ::, jail so close. We feel that the property in Jay Gardens has a t!hance to be developed into more homes for families and having "Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc." or any such use next to this area w)(:ld hurt that developement. Please (.o not approve either of these petitions. ery t:r.ly urs, ,I Joseph E'russiano Corinne Richardson i JUN 1 4 1°'-39 , COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ST._LUCIE COUNTY, FL AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1999 AVllMU Petition of Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc-, for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the following described property: (Location: North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet West of Rock Road) THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTIONIS AVAILABLE UPONREQUEST If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners on July 8,1999. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on July 9, 1999. FILE NO. RZ-99-017 (� M ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD.OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEMING AGENDA JULY 20;1999. TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and in accordance with the provisions of the St. Lude County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. Lucia County Board of County Commissioners amsidx.their request as follows 1. CASSENS LAND ENTERPRISES, INC., for a Change in Zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1-du/acre) Zoning 04W to the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District for the following described property: Section 25, Township 34 Sov#y Range 39 East, from the NW corner of the NW '/4 of the SW '/4 run east 71 feet- thence South 60 feet for thr Point of Beginning; thence South 270 feet, thence East 400 feet, thence North 270 feet, thence West 4QO feet to the Point of Beginning - less road and canal rightof-way (2.48 AC) .(OR 595-877) (Tax I.D. No. 1325-322-0001-000/7). (Location: 3180 North Kings Highway) 2. ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC" for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, GenemQ Zoniing District to the I nnsfitutiowl) Zoning District for the following described property: Section 11, Township 35 South, Range 39 East, the west '/4 of the southeast'/4 of the northwest V4 - less the South 54 fed (10.25 (AC) (OF 218-1275) (Case # 89-14124) (OR 999-2668) (Tax I.D. No. 2311-2424000-000/5).- (Location: North side_ of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,000 fed West of Rode Road) 3.'ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC., for a Conditional Use Permit to -allow Educational Services in the I (Instihtioeah Zoning District for the following described property: Section 11, Township 35 South, Range 39 East, the west 'A of the southeast'/4 of the northwest'/4 - less the South 54 fed.(10.25 AC) PI 218-1275) (Case # 89-14124) (OR 999-2668) (fax I.D. No. 2311-242-0000-000/5). (location: North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,000 fed West of Rode Road) 4. WOLFGANG HOFHERR, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the manufacture of cut stone and stone products in the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District for the following described property: Section 35, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, Kings Highway Indus- trial Patic,-Unit Two, Block A, Lots 41, 42, and 43. (Tax I.D. Nos. 1335-802-0026-000/2, la35-802-0027-000/9, and 1335.802-0028.000/6� (Location: Commercial Circle, Unit Two, Block A, Lots 41, 42, and 43 of the Kings Highway Industrial Park) 5. DANIEL A. RUBINO, for a Change in Zoning from the RS-3 (Residen- Hol, Single -Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the AR-i (Agricultural,' Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District for the following described property: Section 2, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, Indian River Estates, Unit' 1, Block 2, Lots i and 2 - less the Wed 9 feet (Map 34/02M (OR 624-2525) (OR 246-1445) (Tax I.D. Nos. 3402-602-0046-000/5 and 3402-602.0047-000/2). (Location: 505 East Midway Road. Southwest corner of the intersection of East Midway Road and Pinetree Drive) 6. MATT STONE, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the manufacture of concrete products in the IH (Industrial, Heavy) Zoning District for the following described property: PARCEL ONE: Commence at the northwest comer of Section 6, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida; dhennce run South 00'03'38" East, along the wed line of sold Section 6, a distance of 49.50 feet to a point on the south line of North St. ludo River Water Control Distrid Canal No. 102 and to northwest corner of Lot 8 of Model Land Company. Subdivision as per the plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 4, page 34 of to Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, said point being the Point of Beginning (POB). From the Point of Beginning, thence run North 89'S7'33" East, along the south line of said Canal No. 102, a distance of 888.57 feel to a point of intersection with a curve, a radial to said point fearing North 62'53'42" East; thence run southerly along the arc of a curve concave to the west having a radius of 1775.86 fed and a central angle of 12'32'02" an arc distance of 388.48 fed to a point of tangency; thence run South 14'34' 16" East, a distance of 488.82 feet to a point of curvature; thence run along the arc of a curve concave to the west having a radius of 2545.00 feet' and a central angle of 14'2515", an arc distance of 640.55 feet to a point of tangency; thence run South 00'09'O1" East, a distance of 107.96 fed; thence run North 89'50'59" East, a distance of 120.00 feet, thence run South 00°09'01" East, a distance of 878.69 feet, thence run South 45'07'08" East, a distance of 42.45 feet to a point; thence run South 00*05'14" East, a distance of 20.00 feet to a point on the north, right-of-way line of Wad. Midway Road, an 80 foot wide right-of-way; thence run South 89'54`4e West along said north right- of-way line of West Midway Road a distance of 180.00 feet,, thence run North OD'05'14" West, a distance of 20.00 feet; t hens' run North 44'52'52" East, a distance of 42.40 feet to a point•, thence run North 00'09'01" West, a distance of 631.82 feet to a non -tangent intersection with a aurve, iold point having a radial bearing to the point of North 64'4543" East; trance run northwestetiy along the arc of a curve con - cove to the southwest having a radius of 265.00, feet and a central angle of 35*48'18", on arc distance of 165AO feet to a polio of taigency; thence run North 61'02'34" West, a distance of 704.33 fast to a point of curvature; thence run along the arc of a curve concave to the south having a radius of 3¢5.00 feet and a central angle of 28'59'34, on arc distance of 184.70 feel to a point of tangency; thence run South 89'57'52" West, a distance of 182.58 feet to a point of curvature, thence run along the arc of a curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 25.00 fed and a central angle of 50'50'00", an arc distance of 22.18 fed to a point of reverse curvor" thence run along the arc of a curve concave to.the north having a radius of 70.00 fed and a central angle of I I0'50b0, an arc distance of 135.41 fed to a point, thence run South 8915752" West a distance of 9.37 fed to point on the west line of Section 6; thence run North 00'03'38" West alongAald west line of Section 6, a distance of 70.00 feet, thece run North 0'57'52" east, a distance of 9.40 het to a point on a am" with a radial to said point bearing North 60*02*08' Wash' thence run easterly along the arc of a cow concave to the south having a radius of 70.00 fed and a central angle of I I0'50'00, an arc distance of 135.41 fed to a point of reverse curvature; thence run along the arc of a curve concpw to the northeast having a radius of 25.00 fed and a central angle of 50'50'00", an ar4distance of 22.18 fed to a point of tangency; thence run North 89°57'52" East, a distance of 182.58 fad to point of curva- ture; thence run easterly along the arc of a carve concave to the south having a radius of 435.00 feet and a central angle of 00'27'50", an arc distance of 3.52 feat to a point on the east line of Lot 8 of Model Land Company Subdivision; thence run North 00'03'52" West along the east line of said Lot 8, a distance of 618.92. fed to the northeast corner of the South'h of Lot 8, thence run South 89.57'43" West, along the north line of the South 'A of Lof 8, a distance of 329.72 feet to the northwest corner of the South'h of Lot 8, sold corner lying on the wait line of Section 6,, thence run North 00'03'38" West, along the west line. of Section 6, a'. distance of 628.90"to #ha Point of Beginning. PARCEL TWO: Commence at the northwest corner of Section 6, Town- ship 36 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida;'thence run', southeast, along the wed line of sold Section 6, a distance of 49.50 fed' to a point on On south line of North St. Lucia River Water Control District Canal No. 102 and the northwest comer of Lot 8 of Model Land Company Subdivision as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 4, page 34 of the Public Records of St. Lude County, Florida; thence run North 89'57'33" East, along the south line of sold Canal No. 102 and the north line of Lots 5, 6, 7. and 8 of Model Lard Company Subdivision, a distance of 1043.17 feet to the Point of Beginning. From the Point of Beginning continue along the south line of Canal No. 102, North 89*57133 East, a distance of 414.74 fed; thence run South 00102'27" East, a distance of 300.00 feet, thence run South 89'57'33" West, a distance of 323.90 feet, Chace run North 14'34'16" West, a distance of 66.59 fed to a point of curvature; thence run northerly along the arc of a curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 2120.00 fed and a central angle of 02.51'44", an arc distance of 105.91 fed to a point of compound curvafiure; trance run northerly along the arc of a curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 3336.33 Feet and a central angle of 02'2524", an arc distance of 141.11 fed to the Point of Beginning. (Part of Tax I.D. No. 3406-501-0034-000/O). (Location. Proposed Midway Industrial Pork. Northwest comer of, the intersection of West Midway Road and proposed Wed Milner Drive). PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the Roger PoiMas Administration Annex Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on July 20, 1999, beginning at 7.00 P.M. or -as loon thereafter as possible PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commis- sion with respectto any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure tat a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ PAULA A. LEWIS, CHAIRMAN Pub.: July 9, 1999 l/ - "ONT OF TANGENCY; THENCE RUN SOUTH W 09 01' A DISTANCE OF 107.96 FRET; nHENCE RUN NORM 69 C�00' No. 3161 EAST, A ��E NCE RUN iDISTANCE 09' OD OF 8778 69 FEET; ST. DUCE COUNTY HOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS THENCE RUM SOUTH 4W Or 00' EAST, A DISTANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA 42.46 FEET TO A POW;.INENCE RUN SOUTH W W I r JULY 20. 1999 - EAST, A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE NORM RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST MIDWAY ROAD, AN 60 TO WHOM If MAY CONCEAFt FOOT WIDE RIGHF-OF-WAY; THENCE RUN SOUTH 69' W 46• WEST ALONG SAID NORTH RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST NOTICE Is hereby ON" In aowxkvm with Section MIDWAY ROAD A DISTANCE OF i S0.00 FEET; THENCE RUN 11.00.03 of the St. Lude County Land Development Code and NORM 00' W 14- WESTA DISTANCE OF 20M FEET. THENCE In accordance with the provbbns of the St. Lucie County Corn- RUN NORTH 44' 67 Sr EAST. A DISTANCE OF 42AO FEET To pretorWo Flon, that the Iolowl appkxMF have requested A PW. THENCE RUN NORTH 00' Or Ol' WEST. A DISTANCE that to St. Luck County Board of County Co mtuloners can. OF 631.62 FEAT TO A NOWIA GE NT INTEREECi1ON WIN A rider toe request at follows: CLINE, SAID POINT HAVING A RADIAL BEARING TO THE POW OF NORM 64' 46' 4r WIT: IH04M RUN HORTHAVESiMY 1. CASSEMS IAA ENTERPSM INC. br a Change In ALONG THE ARC OF A CARVE CONCAVE TO THE JOUNHVWEN;f Zoning Gam Mrs AR-1 pOAUAuraL ReNdentlal - 1 HAVING A RADIX OF 26GAO FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE du/=*) Zoning Dkhlct To to L Mdust" Ughl) Zoning OF 36' 4B 1 r AN ARC DISTANCE OF 166AO FEET 10 A Dktrlot for the following described property PONT OF TAIGHNCY; iHE10E RUIN NORM 61. 07 34' WEST A DISTANCE OF 704.33 FEET TO A POINT OF CURVATURE; SECTION 25. TOWNSHIP u SOUTH, RANGE 39 FAST, FROM THENCE RUN ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NW COWER OF THE NW 114 OF THE SW 114 RUN EAST THE SOUTHHAVING A IADIDS OF 366A0 FEET AD 71 FEET, THENCE 3OUM 60 FEET FOR THE POW OF A CENTRAL ANGLE OF W W 34' AN ARC DISTANCE OF SEGININNG, THENCE SOUTH 270 FEET. THENCE WST 400 1 K70 FEET TO A POINT OF W4001C I THENCE RUN FEET, THENCE NORM 270 FEET, IHENCE WEST 400 FEET 10 SOUTH 69' 87' 5r WEST, A DISTANCE OF 182A FEET 10 A THE POINT OF INDW40 - LESS ROAD AND CANAL PONT OF CURVATURE; THENCE RUN ALONG THE ARC OF A RIGHT -"AY " AC) (OR M4771 (TAX LID. NO. CURVE CONCAVE 10 THE 801RIEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 1326d22-0001-0OQT4 25.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 60' W Or AN ARC DISTANCE OF 22.14 FEET 10 A POW OF REVERSE "c llon: 3180 Nodh 0ngs HiOhnwy) CURVATURE: THENCE RUIN ALONG THE ARC OF A CARVE CONCAVE TO THE NORM HAVING A RADIUS OF 70.00 FEET 2. ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES. INC.. for a Change In Zoning AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 110' W 00' AN ARC DISTANCE from the CG r4mmercld, Genen:4 Zoning Okldd b Me I OF 136.41 FEET 10 A PONT: THENCE RUN SOUTH $9' Sr 6r (IndMdlonal) Zoning Dkfrlct for to blowing desabed WEST. A DISTANCE OF 9.37 FEET TO POINT ON THE WEN LEE proEserty. OF SECTION 6; THENCE RUN NORM 00' 03' 3r WEST. ALONG SAD WEST LINE OF SECTION 6. A DISTANCE OF SECTION 11, 10WNHHP 35 IOU TK RANGE 39 FAST. THE 70.00 FEET; THENCE RN NORM S9' dr8r EAST. A WEST 114 OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF THE NORTtNESt 114 - DISTANCE F 9AO FEET ON A UR _ LESS THE SOUTH 64 FEET (10.25 AQ (OR 216-1276) (CASE RADIAL TO POINT SEARING10APONT NORTH 6 WEST; I89-14124) (OR 999-2668) (TAX LID. NO. THENCE RUN FASiERLYALDNG THE ARC OF A CURVE 2311-212 TOOT OOQ6). CONCAVE TO THE SOUTH ADIUS OF 711LOO FEET ON � CENTRAL ANGLE OF i 10' W ARC DISTANCE gooalbrc North side of Orange Avwreo, OF 135.41 FEET 10 A POW OF REVISE CURVATURE; , F F nale01 J700"Wed a Rods THENCE RUN RANG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE 10 Road) THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 28.00 FEET AND A COMA ANGLE OF 60' W 00' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 3. ECSERD YOUTH ATE RNA11VES, HNC, for a CarndAbnal Use 22.16 FEET TO A PONT OF TANGENCY: THENCE RN NORTH Per" to allow Educational Services in Ile 1 ry dlullo all 69' 6r 6r FAST, A DISTANCE OF 182.68 FEET lO POW OF Zoning DWrlct for The bBow" Wsabed property: CURVATURE THENCE RUN EASIMY RANG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE THE SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 436 00 SECTION 11. TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. THE WEST FEET AND A MOM ANGLE OF 00' 2r 80' AN ARC 114 OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 - LESS THE DISTANCE OF 3A2 FEET TO A POW ON THE EAST LINE OF SOUTH 64 FEET (10.25 AC).(OR 219.12751(CAN d89-14124) LOT 8 OF MODEL LAND COMPANY XXON001% THENCE (OR 999-2668) (WC I.D. NO.2311-M-O000. M. RUN NORM 00' OW 6r WEST ALONG THE FAST NNE OF SAID LOT S. A DISTANCE OF 618.92 FEET 10 THE NORTHEAST (Iocalon: North side a Orage Amerm CORNER OF THE SOUTH 112 OF LOT 8: THENCE RN SOUTH gvmd wW 1.0001" Wed of Rods W 6r 43' WEST. ALONG THE NORM LINE OF THE SOUTH 112 R000 OF LOT S. A DISTANCE OF 329.72 FEET TO THE NORTHWEST COWER OF THE SOUTH 1)2 OF LOT S. SAID CORER LYING 4. VVO FAANG NOFFIFRR, for a Condmaa Use Feehl to allow ON THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 6: THENCE RUN NORTH 00' the m nifachre of cull done and slone products h The L W 38' WEST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SECTION 6. A (Industrial. UOtt) ja ft District for to following dedabed pnopwty: - DISTA10E OF 628.90 FEET TO THE PONT OF BEOIMNING. ) PARCEL TWO: SECTION 36. TOWNSHIP u SOUTH; L 1M 39 EAST. IRUGS - HIGHWAY NDUSTBAI PARK TINT 11,1110. K=A. LOTS 41. 42.- COMIWE NCE AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 6. AND 43. (TAX I.D. NOS. 1336.802402600IAL TOWNSHIP, 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 FAST, ST. UUCE COUNTY. 1336-802-0027-009. AND 1336. 8024)028-000/6)_ FLORCN; THENCE RN SOUTH EAST, RANG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 49.50 FEET TO A PONT ON (Looalae Cartmada Cede, Uh8 MIS MockA. THE SOUTH LINE OF NORM ST. I= RIVER WATER CONTROL Lob 41. 42, and 43 of to Kings Highway DSiRCT CANAL NO.102 AND THE NORTHWEST COMM OF kKknm Pala LOT I OF MODEL LAD COMPANY SUDHVINON AS PER FLAT THEREOF RECORDED PW COOLNiYAROE 5. DANIEL A RBINO. br a Charge In Zoning earn to R3J RECORDS OF S CD� iHHEE10E (Redder", ShWe*w* - 3 dWaore) Zow" DWdal to RUN NORTH 89 673r FAST. ALONG THE SOUTH WE OF SAID Me AR-1 ( sicult ral, Residential - I dulacre) Zoning CANAL NO.102 AND THE NORTH LSE OF LOU IL 6.7. AND 6 DWW for The following deeaI - pn pW. OF MODEL LAD COMPANY SUBDIVISION. A DISTANCE OF 1043.17 FEET TO THE PONT OF IEGNNNG. SECTION 2, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RUNGS 40 EAST. I DIAN RIVER ESTATES, UNIT 1. HACK 2. LOST 1 AND 2 - LESS THE FROM THE POW OF SE -GINNING CONTINUE ALONG THE WEST 9 FEET W 34=4 (OR 624-26251(OR 246-1446) SOUTH LINE OF CANAL No. TO& NORTH t9' 6r SS' USA TAXI. -00�'OOl>I6 AND DISTANCE OF 414.74 FEET; THENCE RUIN SOUTH 00' 07 27' � FAA. A DISTANCE OF 301LOO FEET: THENCE RUN SOUTH tr 6r 33' WEST, A DISTANCE OF 323.90 FEET; THENCE RUN (lacalonn 606 Sad Midway load 60nlNnwedf owe NORTH IC 34' 16' WEST. A OSUNCE OF 66.59 FEET TO a Inieneedl o a Sad Midway Road e l l eee A POINT OF CURVATURE: THENCE RUN NORRMY MOM BE and TU ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2120.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF Or 6. MATT STONE, for a Corndltbnd Use Pemtf toaeow Nee 61' 4C AN ARC DISTANCE OF 106.91 FEET TO A PONT OF monubckn of cmm% p oduck In to N Lhdkattlal. COMPOUND CIIMMM HENCE RUN NORIHIKY MOM Heavy) Zoning Obldat for to bllowls desabed property: THE ARC OF A CLINE CONCAVE 10 IE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 3336.35 FEET AD A CENTRAL ANGLE OF Or PARCEL ONE 26'24' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 141.11 FEET TO THE POW OF EEC• (PART OF TAX I.D. NO. 3406-501 OOU- % COMMENCE AT THE NORTHWEST COINER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST. A. MICE COUNTY. (000flon: ProEwwd Midway Indutrid Pak FLORIDA; THENCE RN SOUTH W OS'38' EAST. MANTA THE PNodhwed comer of to h/erseclon of WEST LIE OF SAID KaION 6, A DSI NCE OF 49AO FEET TO Wed Midway Rood and proposed Wed Meer A PONT ON THE SOUTH LINE OF NOMN A IUCE RIVER Ddwl, WATER CONTROL DISTRICT CANAL NO.102.AD THE NORTHWEST COWER OF TAT I OF MOOR TAD COMPANY NffilC HEARINGS will be held In to County Cor rninbn S SDIVSION AS PER THE PLAT THEREOF RECORDED N PLAT Chambers. 3rd floor of the Roger Fall. AdmFt kdlon Amer BOOR 4. PAGE 34 OF TE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE &Mdhq, 2300 Vlrgkta Avenue, Foal Pierce. Florda on July 20. COUNTY. FLORIDA SAID POINT BEING THE PONT OF 1999. beghntng of 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereater as posdbN. BEGINNING ?04 PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105. Flaaa Statutes. I a person FROM iFE POINT OF IC6NMNIIG. IIEICE RN NORTH B9' decides to upped any node by a board. ar 6r33- EAST. ALONG THE SOUTH UE OF SMO CANAL NO. ttoandecision with respect any matter cf a-mee, onsidered a a.IS. i M A DISTANCE OF 886.67 FEET 10 A POINT OF Mg or hens f the an Mg .f touring, M war Hoed a record d a the proc and a INTERSECTION WITH A CURVE, A RADIAL 10 SAID POINT O 0 vs W. for �^ purposes, he may need ensure Ind a vsnba SEARING NORM 6r 63'4r EAST. THENCE RN SOUTHERLY ttm recast d ate a k made, which records udes , RANG THE ARC OF A CARVE CONCAVE 10 TIE WEST ce u to be the teslknortY and evberwe upon which the appeal k b W evidmocence HAVING A RADIUS OF 1776.66 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE based. OF 1 r 32YM' AN ARC oISTANCE OF 388.46 FEET TO A POW OF TANGENCY; THENCE RUN SOUTH 14- 3416- EASE. BOARO OF COUNTY COMPoRSSIONERS A DISTANCE OF 486.82 FEET TO A POW OF CURVAMfE: SE LIKE COUNTY, FLORIDA THENCE RN ALONG THE ARC OFACURVE CONCAVE TO TS! PALM A LEWIS. CHWRMAN THE WEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2646.00 FEET AD A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 1 C 28' 1 W AN ARC DMANCE Of 640JS6 FEET 1O Publish: AtY 9, 1999 i 1 �: 6 u., { PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 06/17/99 File Number RZ-99-017 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Planning Manager DATE: June 17, 1999 SUBJECT: Application of Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc., for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District. LOCATION: 8500 Orange Avenue Extension. North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1000 feet from Rock Road. EXISTING ZONING: CG (Commercial, General) PROPOSED ZONING: I (Institutional) FUTURE LAND USE: COM (Commercial) PARCEL SIZE: 10.25 acres PROPOSED USE: Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc., as an educational service. This use requires a Conditional Use permit. The petition for the Conditional Use will be considered as an accompanying petition. PERMITTED USES: Attachment "A" - Section 3.01.03(X) I (Institutional) - contains the designated uses which are permitted by right, permitted as an accessory use, or permitted through the conditional use process. Any use designated as a "Conditional Use" is required to undergo further review and approvals. Any use not found within the zoning district regulations are designated as prohibited uses for that district June 17, 1999 Petition: Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc. Page 2 File No.: RZ-99-017 SURROUNDING ZONING: U (Utilities) to the south. I (Institutional) to the north and east. AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) to the west, with a nonconforming subdivision of which several lots have been changed to RS-4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4 du/acre). SURROUNDING LAND USES: The existing land uses surrounding the property are Transportation Utilities to the south. Public Facilities to the FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: UTILITY SERVICE: TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: north and east. Residential Urban to the west. There are several Institutional uses in the area. The Future Land Use Classification of the immediate surrounding area is COM (Commercial). Station #11 (3501 Shinn Road), is located approximately seven miles to the southwest. The subject property is serviced by Fort Pierce Utilities. The existing right-of-way width for Orange Avenue is 100 feet. None. Concurrency Deferral Affidavit. June 17, 1999 Petition: Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc. Page 3 File No.: RZ-99-017 STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.06.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed rezoning, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed rezoning is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; The proposed zoning district is consistent with the St. Lucie itounty Land Development Code, and has specifically met the requirements of Section 11.06.03. 2. Whether the proposed amendment is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan; The proposed change in zoning is consistent with all elements of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. The I (Institutional) zoning district is compatible with the COM (Commercial) Future Land Use. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed zoning is inconsistent with the existing and proposed land uses; _ The proposed zoning is consistent with existing and proposed land uses in the area. The general use of the immediate surrounding area of the subject property is mixed with several existing institutional uses in the area. The St. Lucie County Jail is to the north of the property. Emergency Operations Center is to the east of the property. Single family, Multiple family, Commercial, Industrial and Utility uses and zonings also exist in the immediate area. 4. Whether there have been changed conditions that require an amendment; Conditions have not changed so as to require an amendment. 5. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in demands on public facilities, and whether or to the extent to which the proposed amendment would exceed the capacity of such public facilities, including but not limited to transportation facilities, sewage facilities, water supply, parks, drainage, schools, solid waste, mass transit, and emergency medical facilities; June 17, 1999 Petition: Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc. Page 4 File No.: RZ-99-017- The intended use for this rezoning is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. Prior to the approval of any proposed development, the applicant will need to provide documentation verifying that sufficient facilities are in place to support the development. 6. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed amendment is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The applicant will be required to comply with all fedefal, state, and local environmental regulations. The site is currently developed. Interior renovations and associated site improvements are expected. 7. Whether and the extent to which the proposed amendment would result in an orderly and logical development pattern specifically identifying any negative affects of such patterns; An orderly and logical development pattern will occur with this change in zoning. The surrounding parcels of property in the area are designated for a wide range of uses. The property has been used for General Commercial use. 8. Whether the proposed amendment would be in conflict with the public interest, and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of this Code; The proposed amendment would not be in conflict with the public interest and is in harmony with the purpose and intent of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The petitioner, Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc., has requested this change in zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District in order to house their facility which is intended to assist youth in bettering themselves. Specifics of this use will be discussed in more detail in the accompanying Conditional Use petition. Attached is a copy of Section 3.01.03(X), of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, which delineates the permitted, accessory, and conditional uses allowed in the Institutional Zoning District. If the change in zoning request is approved, the applicant, by right, would be allowed to establish any of the uses under the Permitted Uses section. Any use under the (,%W (VAW June 17, 1999 Petition: Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc. Page 5 File No.: RZ-99-017 Accessory Uses section would be allowed only if one or more of the permitted uses exists on the subject property. Any use under the Conditional Uses section could only be allowed if it first receives approval through the Board of County Commissioners. Staff has reviewed this petition and determined that it conforms with the standards of review as set forth in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. r Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment hf cc: M X. I INSTITUTIONAL 1. Purpose Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations The purpose of this district is to provide and protect and environment suitable for institutional, public, and quasi -public uses, together with such other uses as may be compatible with institutional, public, and quasi -public surroundings. The number in "()" following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a -use not defined 'under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Permitted Uses a. Community residential homes subject to the provisions of Section 7.10.07. (999) b. Family day care homes. (m) C. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that the sponsoring agency or the Department of Health and Rehabilitative Sbrvices (HRS) notifies the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. (999) d. Institutional residential homes. (m) e. Parks. (999) f. Police & fire protection (9221.9224) g. Recreational activities. (m) h. Religious organizations (666) 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 4. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. 6. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00. 7. Conditional Uses a. Amphitheaters. (m) b. Cemeteries. (r w) C. Membership organizations (ee) d. Correctional institutions. (9223) e. Cultural activities and nature exhibitions. (m) f. Educational services and facilities (e2) g. Executive, legislative, and judicial functions. (91.9z93.94.9596.97) h. Fairgrounds. (9N) i. Funeral and crematory services. (726) j. Theaters. (Ng) Adopted August 1. 1990 132 Revised Through 04/15/99 ('�e Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations k. Medical and other health services. teo) 1. Postal service. (43) M. Residential care facilities for serious or habitual juvenile offenders. (om) n. Social services (83) o. Sporting and recreational camps (-rom) p. Stadiums, arenas, race tracks (794) q. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 (wg) 8. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following: a. Drinking places (alcoholic beverages related to civic, social, and fraternal uses). (M) b. Restaurants. (Including the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premises consumption only.) ON) C. Funeral and crematory services. (ry) d. Heliport landing/takeoff pads. (m) f e. Detached single-family dwelling unit or mobile home, for on -site security purposes. (m) f. Residence halls or dormitories. (m) Adopted August 1, 1990 133 Revised Through 04/15/99 r i O "O M O � M tO 00 %C �O Vl d' Os et en 1.0 CN N — et v1 ~ N et t- M h P O 00 .-. h M et N Yl M ... V'1 Os O� tt �n eP ON � v1 et M "O N Y1 00 In et 0% et %0 "C Ov N to , 0, et d' O O O 00 �-, O, O a' O O O 0% 01 � 00 N N tM w N 00 O, st O 10 M 00 O t- �--� G wl O , as d' M K1 0 0 M M N M N M r+ M M O\ N M M .r aa��Faa'aUa.aa�zlaaa¢��¢¢¢��¢a¢ ww �Uww wzw w wwwc7 c73a awUi� v>,w xw N CQGU� g�a z v aaFo4 ph �p¢0 GaFcv' go aa�:`n 1�0 004�OR P400zz 0N� �¢zrcn Uraaaao�RaEc��.;;,¢W�O v v AOO� w>w v 0 i O a i0 Czo�> H0 ; aO �'oaa ¢¢o -- ¢a o Aam¢ozd¢Hw XaxA�M¢w°w0�0~ �39 z r`�' 3 �v ., NON v�mi U m CO W �o 00 N 0 Ol O %o W ° v1 on W O U et r- O �O ~ %0 PCl O "" U O O N N •"+ %n O� O 00 00 O N 0 0 "C O Ol �O C. M 00 Vl ~ 4n ^' N ^' �+ N �C 00 N �-. O N N n. x M N N %O i W! E is x xA � IW O vo a> i a ° Go p d cc p I i0 w+ ' cd t U i Ii p a a w o �! ai¢ a o 0 z aO c �w 48 w, c aFa' " a 0 � �>( 6f°Ou a j >p ;W v">a°.:av� 0 xO aowo° �rxN a cop) oavoF4>• °30o ddzW OV 04� >a ¢ z w o, OW Zf o>¢zz a�� I zz OOo�" "�3 xu�Wado3 d . A w cc z��,�o� w ¢ z W U U�AwOwc7c7 .4 pp jzzaaa�rnv�v� WW WW W ddr�G FFF O O O O O O: O O O O O O O O was O O O S S O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O S S O O 5Xii2 O Q Q V S O Q `vim' S O w O w v) M O �D N Co N O O m O vl O O O O O I O Y1 O, 0 N O O v1 �D O M• M O N 7 O O Co �O et O O O O C� O 00 O O �O �O O 0 O� N O 0 �•-� co 0 Yl O 0 M Cl 0 O N O 0 O co O 0 M N O v1 N O N co vl O O y. 0) a EI g .. O �C 0 O �O 0 C_ N N 0 O �O 0 O 0 N et 0 0 O N O 0 N .. 0 0 0 0 T 0 0 'O 0 N �--� M 0 O '.O 0 .-. M 0 Co %O 0 C. �C 0 �O 0 �O 0 �O Cl �O 0 �O - Cl. �O C -� 0 999 0 0 0 Lr ��', 0 ., M N M N M N M N M N M N M�M NjN M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M1lM IN IN M N M N M N M N M N M N M N M N 1M NO. _4H DATE: 08/17/99 CONSENT [ ] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg.[ ] Quasi-Jud. [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Community Development Director SUBJECT: Request for a Conditional Use Permit for Property located on the north side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet west of Rock Road in the I (Institutional) Zoning District to allow an Educational Service and Facility - Draft Resolution 99-135. BACKGROUND Petition of Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc., for a Conditional Use Permit in the I (Institutional) Zoning District. The stated purpose of the Conditional Use Permit is to allow for an educational service and facility. (File No.: CU-99-003/RZ-99-017) PREVIOUS ACTION: The Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 5 to 0 with 4 members absent (Chairman Wesloski, Mr. Trias, Mr. Moore, and Mr. Matthes), recommended approval of the Conditional Permit at its June 17, 1999, meeting. On July 20, 1999, the Board of County Commissioner discussed the matter and continued the public hearing to August 17, 1999 in order to seek additional information. The requested information is attached. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Draft Resolution 99-135 allowing the Conditional Use Permit, with seven conditions, in the I (Institutional) Zoning District for property located on the north side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet west of Rock Road. COMMISSION AnTTON: [;/APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: 4-1 add a condition that a 40 ft buffer is required. County Attorney: Originating Department: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Review and Approvals Management 6 Budget: Other: 6s M. Anderson y Administrator Purchasing: Other: "%W � q COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-135 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT To: Board of County Commissioners From: Community Development Director Date: August 10, 1999 Subject: Petition of Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc., for a Conditional Use Permit to allow for an Educational Service and Facility in the I (Institutional) Zoning District. (File No.: CU-99-003/RZ-99-017) The proposed Conditional Use will be located on the north side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet west of Rock Road in the I (Institutional) Zoning District. The stated purpose of the rezoning is to allow for an Educational Service and Facility. At the June 17, 1999, public hearing on this matter, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission, by a vote of 5 to 0 with four members absent, recommended approval of this petition as set forth in Draft Resolution 99-135. This proposed Conditional Use meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. At the July 20, 1999 public hearing, the Board of County Commissioners discussed the matter and continued the public hearing until August 17, 1999 in order to seek additional information. Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc., has provided an analysis of other parcels considered (see attachment) . Staff recommends the approval of this petition for a Conditional Use, with seven conditions, to allow an Educational Service and Facility in the I (Institutional) as set forth in Draft Resolution 99-135. SUBMITTED: Julia Shewchuk, AICP Community Development Director if cc: Daniel Arroyo File cm M 1 RESOLUTION 99-135 2 FILE NO.: CU-99-003/RZ-99-017 3 4 A RESOLUTION FOR A CONDITIONAL USE 5 PERMIT TO PERMIT AN EDUCATIONAL 6 SERVICE AND FACILITY IN I (INSTITUTIONAL) 7 ZONING FOR PROPERTY IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, 8 FLORIDA 9 10 WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made 11 the following determinations: 12 13 1. Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc.. presented a petition for a Conditional Use 14 Permit to Allow an Educational Service and Facility in I (Institutional) 15 Zoning for the property described below. 16 17 2. On June 17, 1999, the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission 18 held a public hearing on the petition, after publishing notice at least 10 days 19 prior to the hearing and notifying by mail all owners of property within 500 20 feet of the subject property, and recommended that the Board of County 21 Commissioners approve the hereinafter described request for a Conditional 22 Use Permit in I (Institutional) Zoning for the property described below. 23 24 3. On July 20, 1999, this Board held a public hearing on the petition, after 25 publishing a notice of such hearing and notifying by mail all owners of 26 property within 500 feet of the subject property. 27 28 4. The proposed Conditional Use is consistent with the goals, objectives, and 29 policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and has satisfied the 30 requirements of Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land 31 Development Code. 32 33 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of 34 St. Lucie County , Florida: 35 36 A. Pursuant to Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a 37 Conditional Use Permit for Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc., to allow an 38 Educational Service and Facility in I the (Institutional) Zoning District is granted 39 for the property described below, subject to the following conditions: 40 File No.: CU-99-003 Resolution 99-135 August 10, 1999 Page 1 0 CM 1 1. The hours of operation for student instruction shall be from 7 a.m. to 5 2 p.m. The facility may be used during other hours for related activities 3 which do not involve direct student contact. 5 2. The westerl erty line s &enhanced with landscaping so as to meet 6 the intent of Section 7.09.00 of the St. Lucie County Land Development 7 Code. 8 9 3. There shall be a maximum of 30 students at any time. 10 11 4. The driveway shall remain in its current location. 12 13 5. The program shall remain a non-residential program. 14 15 6. The program shall not enroll students that have exceeded Level II offenses. 16 17 7. Prior to the issuance of any building permits, the developer shall have 18 received all the applicable permits. 19 20 B. The property on which this Conditional Use Permit is being granted is described ash 21 follows: 22 23 THE WEST FIVE ACRES OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PROPERTY. 11 SECTION, 35 24 TOWNSHIP, 39 RANGE WEST 1/4 OF SOUTHEAST 1/4 OF NORTHWEST 1/4 LESS SOUTH 25 54 FEET OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. (Tax ID# 2311-242-0000-000/5) 26 27 Location: 8500 Orange Avenue Extension, North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet west 28 of Rock Road.) 29 30 C. This Conditional Use Permit shall expire on July 20, 2000, unless a Zoning 31 Compliance has been obtained in accordance with Section 11.05.00(B) of the St. 32 Lucie County Land Development Code. 33 �)1� �� 34 D. A Certificate of Capacity, a copy of which is attached to tfiis resolution, was 35 granted by the Community Development Director on 29, -W99, which 36 certificate shall remain valid for the period of Conditional Use approval. Should 37 the Conditional Use approval granted by this resolution expire or an extension be 38 sought pursuant to Section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development 39 Code, a new certificate of capacity shall be required. 40 41 42 43 File No.: CU-99-003 Resolution 99-135 August 10, 1999 Page 2 *40f 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 E. The St. Lucie County Community Development Director is hereby authorized and directed to cause the notation of this resolution to be made on the Official Zoning Map of St. Lucie County, Florida, and to make notation of reference to the date of adoption of this resolution. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis XXX Vice -Chairman John D. Bruhn XXX Commissioner Frances Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 17"' Day of August 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: DEPUTY CLERK hf H: \\ECKERMN INGRESOLUTION/ File No.: CU-99-003 August 10, 1999 APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY Resolution 99-135 Page 3 Aug-10�99 05:26A daniel arroyo 407 977-1669 P-02 vUrr" Scribner Construction 1050 Bob White Trail Chuluota, Florida 32766 August 10, 1999 St. Lucie County County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 Ref. File Number CU-99-003 File Number RZ-99-017 Dear Commissioners, In order to address the question about alternative sites that was raised at the July 20 meeting, I have complied a listing of the various properties that have been considered. This list shows the positive and negative attributes of each parcel as well as our recommendations. 1 believe that a review of this list will clearly show that every reasonable effort has been made to find an appropriate site for the Eckerd Leadership Program, ELP. The selection of the property at 8500 Orange Avenue Extension was based on a careful review of many properties over a six month time table. The ELP program has served 181 youth since it opened in February of 1997. The total _number of St. Lucie County youth served to date is 108 or W1* of all the youth served. Currently there are 27 youth in the program with 18 of those or 67% being from St. Lucie County. On the current waiting list for the program there are 11 youth, of these 8 or 73% are from St. Lucie County. These numbers clearly show that St. Lucie County is benefiting considerably from this program and that there is a real need within the community for this program. See attached list for comparison by City and County. Please remember that our re -zoning request is for a 30 youth non-residential program. There was some confusion on this point in a local newspaper after the July 2& meeting. With the Conditional Use requirements recommended by County Staff, I believe that the issues and concerns expressed by the neighbors concerning an Institutional zoning designation are well addressed within the Conditional Use stipulations. This is not an open ended zoning change as they fear. I hope that this information along with certain financial information that will be presented to you on August 17, will avail you as to the benefits of having this program in St. Lucie County. Thank you in advance for your consideration and time spent in this matter. Ze y, P. Arroyo a £O'd 6991-LL6 LOV OiCO-A-AE jaLLuvp tf9Z:S0 66-01-6nV N a 9 A� 0 C C. �OS, _O O O W C: u' •1 � o � r a x V a � x •� 3 o a ts0'd 6991-LL6 LOb OjCC3-&..« JOLUep b9Z:90 66-01-6nV Aug-10-99 05:27A daniel arroyo 407 977-1669 P_05 cm ELP Cities FACT COUNT(-) CITY LP02 2 Felismere LP02 74 Ft. Piefce LP02 2 Gifford LP02 2 Hobe Sound LP02 4 Jensen Beach LP02 1 Lake Worth LP02 i Palm City LP02 34 Port St. Lucie LP02 25 Stuart LP02 1 Titusville LP02 33 Vero Beach LP02 2 1 RIO County Tout Indian River 37 St Lucie 108 Martin 32 Other 4 TOTAL 181 kids served since opening 2097 80% of all youth served: St Luse County youth Page 1 i�.. tll hF � A. ,, t i+ � .c„� `•Y� ! ire ! �.�} � x�` r.� r '. K rVA! � � 'T: �t :T� • I Y��S . L`f: i =1j '•*,r?•.' '-a4 1. _ - - /.«. 3 ._w r+ r EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM DESCRIPTION 1998-99 Eckerd Leadership Program Ft. Pierce, FL Program: Eckerd Leadership Pros�ram-Ft. Pierce 1. GOALS - The program is committed to three primary educational goals: • To assist youth and their families so that youth become productive and lead crime -free lives. • To help youth improve their self-esteem and behavior by focusing on three-iearning components: Interpersonal living Personal learning Independent living To help youth become socially and personally responsible citizens by utilizing the service - learning model. 2. SPECIFIC OUTCOME OBJECTIVES During the student's stay in the program the following outcome objectives will be utilized: • 75% of all youth who successfully complete the day treatment will improve their academic skills as measured by educational pre- and post-tests. • of youth oilhave a post-placement plan lc h will 100% nand an include appropriate enrollment in school or employment, employment g appropriate living situation in place. • 100% of the participating students will continue their academic program while enrolled in the program. • 100% of the participating students will receive an individual academic assessment. 3. EVALUATION PROCEDURES Pre/post academic test results will be compared on an annual basis. (Objective 1) Copies of treatment/aftercare plans will be used to document post -placement plans. (Objective 2) Teachersrecords will be used to document completion of academic assessment. (Objective 4) Student schedules will be used to document academic instruction of teachers. (Objective 3) 4. SPECIFIC ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Male or female youthinassigned (lvparticipationRestriby DJJ to level. Intensive Community Control or committed to the Non -Residential Limited English Proficient (LEP) students who meet program eligibility criteria curriculum equal access to the program. When an LEP student is served in the program, the and related services will be designed to appropriately address the needs of LEP students in order to ensure thattheinstruction staff understandable. An will be present at the P review.review will occur prior to this placement and drop prevention NW Exceptional students who meet the program eligibility criteria will be considered for placement. An IEP review and update will occur prior to this placement. 5. STUDENT ADMISSION PROCEDURES Male or female youth in assigned participation by DJJ to Intensive Community Control or committed to the Non -Residential (level 2) Restrictiveness level. 6. PROGRAM OPERATING PROCEDURES a. CURRICULUM: The educational program is designed to incorporate effective instructional strategies for skill development with real -life applications to help learners establish a solid foundation of skills. From this base, learners develop the critical thinking skills necessary to function effectively in today's increasingly complex world. The program is experience - based and challenges students to learn and apply knowledge and skills. Each student is considered an individual, and the variety of course offerings allow for the appropriate education of every student enrolled in the Eckerd Leadership Program. Masic to all course offerings are the following competencies: • general basic skills of reading, language arts, mathematics, science and social studies; • skills for self-awareness, self -acceptance, self-expression, and self-improvement that build positive emotional development; • skills to facilitate interpersonal communication and relationships; and • skills to prepare youth for effective independent living through a range of activities, including employability training and meaningful vocational experiences as appropriate. The curriculum is organized into four broad categories: Cultural awareness Interpersonal communications Personal management and responsibility Study and writing Cultural awareness skills focus on how ethnic and cultural diversity is not a "social problem" or a justified basis for violence, but a reality that enriches their lives and communities. Topics such as recognizing bias and ethnocentricity and resisting stereotyping are addressed. Interpersonal communication skills cover developing effective ways to interact with others in the home, school, work, and community settings. They include communicating needs, teamwork, improving listening skills, interviewing, and handling conflicts and disagreements. Personal management and responsibility skills help students learn the difference between assertive communication and aggression, how to deal with frustration and disappointment, hour to resist peer pressure, and how to make healthy decisions. Other skills include managing stress, controlling anger, goal -setting, and making effective use of time. Study and writing skills is designed to help students gain expertise in locating and evaluating information, distinguishing between fact and opinion, and writing for various purposes --analyzing persuading, informing, and so on. b. SPECIAL STRATEGIES: Combining classroom work with service and social action means learning by doing and giving. The benefits for combining service -learning and skills development are as follows: • Works on the total development of the student as opposed to just focusing on his/her academics. • Teaches career -related skills. • Improves self-confidence and builds resilience. • Uses highly interactive and compatible teaching styles. • Involves families, caregivers and community. As service -learning is the primary model, students will perform meaningful service while engaging in reflection or study related to a topic. The service -learning aspect encourages young people to reach out and address issues that are of concern, both to themselves and others. Behavior limits, clearly defined for youth, shall be incorporated into all organized educational activities. All education staff members participate in inservice training related to instructional strategies and are encouraged to -attend conferences and workshops off campus to maintain and improve skills. It is expected that each classroom instructor will maintain an orderly, efficient classroom atmosphere conducive to academic learning and interpersonal development. Student conduct deemed inappropriate for the particular classroom setting is addressed by using the minimum behavior controls necessary under the circumstances. Verbal reminders and student -teacher conferences are generally sufficient in regaining student's cooperation toward acceptable behavior. The use of corporal punishment is prohibited. Program staff may use brief period of time-out from activities to protect a youth from his own escalating negative behaviors. The time-out is used to let the youth regain a measure of lost control, not to make one miss desirable program activities. c. STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES: Support services are an important part of the educational services offered at the Eckerd Leadership Program. Support services include the following: Counseling; Services There is one social worker on staff, providing individual and group counseling to program participants as well as services to parents. A psychosocial study and a variety of assessments are completed on each youth during the first two weeks in the program. These are used to determine the youth's current level of functioning, to identify needs for �4we C counseling, and to develop a treatment plan. Any special needs identified, such as the need for substance abuse counseling or anger management, are provided by the social worker - through weekly therapeutic groups. When a need arises for more intensive mental health services, referrals are made to New Horizons in Okeechobee or Ft. Pierce. Psychological Services Psychological services are provided on a referral basis to Parent -Child Inc. and to New Horizons for ELP. Medical Services At ELP, youth live at home, and their parents or guardian have responsibility for their healthcare. However, the parents complete a health information form during intake, giving information as to the youth's health status, any chronic health problems, and allergies. In an emergency, the local hospital is used. The social worker helps parents with referrals to health care providers, both for the youth at ELP and for other family members. Health education is provided by the teaching staff. Sneech/L.anauaae Services When IEP's indicate the need for speech or language services, these services are provided through a contract with a local certified speech/language pathologist. Transition/Career/Vocational Counseling During a client's stay at ELP, the student's individual transition or career/vocational needs are addressed through the treatment team as well as a transition IEP for ESE students requiring one. Staff are in contact with family and agency workers to ensure their involvement in the planning phase for the student's future. Realistic goals are set with the students to ensure their successful re-entry_ back into the community. Based on the student's needs and interests, follow-up is provided for educational, vocational, career, and family goals by the appropriate staff. Employability skills are also included into the curriculum, as these skills are seen as essential for this particular population of student. Conflict Resolution Conflict resolution is integrated into all aspects of the Eckerd Leadership Program. Decision -making and problem -solving are core tenets in the treatment and education of youth. The students learn the steps to problem -solving upon entry, and utilize them daily as they encounter conflicts. d. GRADE LEVEL OF STUDENTS: Ungraded; ages 12-17. e. NUMBER AND DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM STAFF: The following table represents the number and description of program staff for each site. Camp Staff Number of Staff Members Total Full -Time Equivalent Full Time Part Time Center director 1 1 Program director 1 1 Program secretary 1 1 Social worker 1 1 Teachers 2 2 Counselors 6 6 f. DESCRIPTION OF FACILITIES: The educational facilities consist of two classrooms. All "academically -oriented" classes are conducted in air conditioned, well -lighted, carpeted classrooms conducive tp learning. g. SITE ADDRESS: Eckerd Leadership Program -Ft. Pierce 602 Atlantic Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34950 (407)465-6134 h. NUMBER OF CLASS PERIODS AND LENGTH OF PERIOD IN MINUTES: Students will be enrolled for a minimum 300 minutes of instruction per day and will be afforded the opportunity to enroll in six courses per semester. Courses are flexibly - scheduled. i. AVERAGE CLASS SIZE: 1:10-12. Each teacher is assisted by a counselor/teacher for an average ratio of 1:5. j . LENGTH OF STAY: 4-6 months k. TOTAL NUMBER OF STUDENTS: FTE Count: 20. Total Served: 50 1. _ TOTAL DROPOUT PREVENTION FULL-TIME EQUIVALENCY PROJECTED (UFTE): 26.00 (represents extended year programs based upon 234 days) 7. QUALIFICATIONS OF PROGRAM PERSONNEL The minimum qualification for one teacher on staff is a valid Florida teaching certificate, preferably in exceptional student education. Other instructional personnel shall have a special interest, talent or aptitude for working with the identified student population and possess skills to carry out service -learning models. Preference is given to those educators with training and backgrounds in affective education, counseling skills and exceptional student education training. Specifically, competencies for instructional staff may include: - Interacting with students and being a model for growth - Teaching collaboratively - Accepting innovation and change - Building multiple learning environments - Demonstrating an ongoing commitment to professional growth opportunities 8. STAFF DEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES Inservice workshops directly related to each specific job position and corresponding responsibilities are conducted periodically to insure consistency of instruction in line with stated program goals_ A four -day organization -wide conference is also sponsored by EFYA each year. Additionally, instructional staff are supported in efforts to improve professional competencies through a Professional Education Program which provides financial assistance for professional workshops, seminars, and classroom experiences. Teachers are given opportunities to participate in local district staff development and inservice training programs. 9. PROJECTED BUDGET The School Board of Pinellas County receives funding through the Florida Education Finance Program (FEFP) who, in turn, contracts with Eckerd Family Youth Alternatives, Inc. to provide educational staff, textbooks, supplemental instructional materials, classroom supplies, curriculum development, and administrative supervision. U a M `O [ V V n P -{� O o � � > c ° ^, I >J ~ w I /L UJ " W P y .. '. , ............. W SO_d W o • P p } f f • � w Q is ml � �'1 r Q 1S nrw PMR ► QSr„- L W y ►v sawn g aN W R=Vu !b„ n In oc at ► o .L� Yvan —&3Y Yt— ms U Z mad Q GVGY 3►1 »YVY �(J � Y3W3N ya C w O Gtl 9M°lOx N70 W ;Y, U c C G"v 1g1N1'3 � U � vv W / W ti ~ vs GC � S 1 S S£ 1 S 9t J. A Nf100 3380HO33>10 � Zoning Ec&d Youth Alternatives Inc. CO CN 0 0 0 U AG-1 AR-1 0 0 1 CU 99-003 Community Development h Geographic Information Systems Map revised May 21,1999 Vwft r V ~h. b— mW. 0 P—W. ft mop a d W-4.. a w ,�... a.d er w ... bg* W0 d ..-M Land Use Ec(d Youth A1ternativ ,,,, 1nc. RU 7 AB 1 9 G O I6s 115 ~/ a �_ Z Moco Lone �� -- i !r a I J 14 I s S6 1 r l 6 1 s 6 I _I_ 0 m I a 1 fJ N I rs l I p I a 0: a 329 West Avenue "C" s >o J 1 4 sl 6 1 s 6 1 s c ° = I •� 32 U Ia !J f,rs K �e — 6 JJ West Avenue " B" x o s — t l Pl / O / ZIJ 4 ,s I i •�`- I 0 I U I! 1 J 41 S 6 7 I o' I I I N Millwood Drive z�a�r� rr.T P/F nt t'm --------- v 0 0 u 0 0 Q_ r-----I E-11 T/U RU z a 0 CU 99-003 MXD range Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map revised May 21.1999 • �.� Thr mnp w tr.r ao.vw kr tl«wr.tohnr+V .M wk— p.prr ar.! Y.orrrrlHr ponM..lY not hlrMM forr.. r . �Y OMp uoaunrat fir' 2M PUBLIC HEARING - ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC. FILE NO. CU-99-003 Ms. Cheryl Thole presented staff comments. Ms. Thole stated that she was presenting the petition of Eckerd Youth Alternatives for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a Private School Establishment in the I (Institutional) Zoning District. The subject property is 10.25 acres and is located at 8500 Orange Avenue Extension which is on the north side of Orange Avenue and approximately 1,000 feet west of Rock Road. Ms. Thole stated that the surrounding zoning to the subject property is U (Utilities) to the south. I (Institutional) to the north and east. AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) to the west, with a nonconforming subdivision of which several lots have been changed to RS-4 (Residential, Single - Family - 4 du/acre). Ms. Thole stated that the surrounding land uses are T/U (Transportation Utilities) to the south. PF (Public Facilities) to the north and east. RU (Residential Urban) to the west. There are several I (Institutional) uses in the area. Ms. Thole stated that Eckerd Youth Alternatives currently operates within the City of Fort Pierce. The building which they have been leasing has been sold. Approval of this petition would allow for continued service to the community. Ms. Thole stated that Eckerd Youth Alternatives has provided information which is attached to the meeting packets that describes their educational programs and operations. The attached plan shows the locations of the buildings and proposed use areas on -site. She stated that these documents describe a use which is compatible for the site and consistent with both the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and the St. Lucie County Land Development Code if the condition of "improvements to the site shall meet all St. Lucie County Land Development Code requirements" is met. A copy of the floor plan is available if the Board would like to review it. Ms. Thole stated that staff finds that this petition, with the recommended condition, meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the Goals, Objectives, and Policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff is, therefore, recommending that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval which includes the recommended condition. Chairman McCurdy asked if there were any questions for the Board. Mr. Merritt asked Mr. Kelly if buffers can be made a requirement. Mr. Kelly stated that appropriate conditions can be placed in the Conditional Use. He stated that Planning & Zoning Commission/ June 17, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 15 staff included the single condition that Eckerd Youth meet the required Code is for two reasons: The requirement for parking; an all weather surface needs to replace the dirt surface that currently exists. The buffer between residential and non-residential. Mr. Kelly stated that if the Board would like to make additional, more specific requirements, that would be fine. Chairman McCurdy asked if there were any other questions from the Board. Ms. Dreyer stated that she believes we need to locate these facilities, they do provide a badly needed community service and at the same time we need to provide appropriate protection for neighbors who are concerned. She believes the applicant needs to assist in fashioning appropriate conditions that would allow the facility to operate and not to be too restrictive. She thought about: • Limiting hours of operation. • Appropriate buffers on the western property line. • Assuring that the access remains where it currently is to avoid traffic issues that could affect the residential neighborhood. • Limited to non-residential students only. • A limit to the number of full time students. Ms. Dreyer stated that she would look to the applicant and staff to look for the appropriate conditions. Mr. Kelly stated that he does not have a problem working with the applicant. He stated that he would look at the items mentioned by Ms. Dreyer and any other items that are appropriate before the County Commission meeting. Ms. Dreyer stated that she does not believe it would be appropriate to adopt the whole program attached to their packets because some of the items may change and some just are not appropriate as conditions. She stated that she would like to see a restriction on the level of offense of which the students have committed. Mr. Kelly suggested establishing some ground rules and having a representative from Eckerd Youth supply additional information, so that we do not come to an impasse after the meeting. Mr. Kelly stated that access is from the south of the property line. Planning & Zoning Commission/ June 17, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 16 M M Ms. Dreyer stated that she was just trying to avoid access on the eastern boundary line. Mr. Kelly stated that the intent of Eckerd Youth is to continue the use of the current access and acknowledged their agreement made from the audience. Mr. George Young stated that the program is non-residential and activities occur during the day except for one meeting a month that is held in the evening which parents attend. He stated that all of the programs run by Eckerd Youth depend on a Citizen Advisory Committee and membership on this Committee is always welcomed. He stated that there are twelve programs in the State of Florida and they are sensitive to the concerns of the neighbors and they plan to appease them. Mr. Young stated that the contractor for this project is present tonight. He stated that they plan to renovate the current facility and they plan to build a fence for their own benefits as well. He stated that any suggestions to the buffer are welcomed. Mr. Young introduced Daniel Arroyo who is the contractor for this project. Mr. Pratt asked Mr. Arroyo if there are any plans to build any more buildings on the site. Mr. Arroyo stated that there are no plans to build anything other than what is currently there now. He stated that they intend to renovate the inside of the building and the non-structural building will be renovated on the inside. This is where the students and faculty will be spending their time. Mr. Arroyo stated that an original site plan was submitted with the initial application. He stated that the building is roughly 5,000 square feet. This will be divided in half between offices and the classroom area. He stated that they intended to build a fence along the residential area. Mr. Oakey asked Mr. Arroyo if Eckerd Youth has purchased the subject property. Mr. Arroyo stated they have not. Mr. Pratt asked who will be held responsible for the environmental clean-up. Chairman McCurdy asked Mr. Pratt if he could hold his questions until later. Mr. Oakey asked Mr. Arroyo if there was a site plan available this evening. Mr. Arroyo stated yes and he would be happy to go over it. He stated that he would be happy to go over the floor plan as well if the Board would like. Mr. Arroyo reminded the Board that they are a non-profit organization and they are trying to make use of the existing buildings as much as possible. He stated that the plumbing facilities fit ADA standards. He stated that they will be leasing with an option to buy the front 5 acres. He stated that they will use the front building and the only use that he can foresee for the pole barn would be to Planning & Zoning Commission/ June 17, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 17 '4r.r *400 park the vans in there at night so they will be more secure. Chairman McCurdy asked if there were any questions. Mr. Pratt asked about the environmental clean-up that is estimated to be $60,000. He stated that Eckerd Youth needs to look into this situation. Chairman McCurdy thanked Mr. Pratt for bringing this concern forward. Mr. Arroyo thanked him as well and said that he would discuss the situation with the current owner. He stated that the reason that they chose this property was for the location and their need to have a place to house their facility before August 1999. Chairman McCurdy referred to the site plan. Chairman McCurdy asked Mr. Arroyo if the first building is 50 feet off of the westerly property lot. Mr. Arroyo stated that he thought it to be between 30 and 40 feet. Chairman McCurdy asked Mr. Kelly if Jean Road would be around 30 feet. Mr. Kelly stated that it should be in the range of 30 to 40 feet. Chairman McCurdy asked Mr. Arroyo if this would be enough to create a buffer and the fence and what type of fence would they be putting up. Mr. Arroyo stated that the area would be large enough for the buffer and the fence. The type of fence would depend on what the County would allow them to do. He stated that they would like to put up a solid wood fence and also landscape. Chairman McCurdy asked Ms. Dreyer if she had any other concerns. Ms. Dreyer stated that she wrote her concerns down. They are as follows: • Limiting hours of operation. • Appropriate buffers on the western property line. • Assuring that the access remains where it currently is to avoid traffic issues that could affect the residential neighborhood. • Limited to non-residential students only. • A limit to the number of full time students. Planning & Zoning Commission/ June 17, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 18 %W , Ms. Dreyer stated that she is not aware of the number of students that are involved in this program. Mr. Arroyo stated that Mr. Young would be the best one to answer this question. Mr. Young stated that the program is operated by contract and reads that there can be 30 youth who are level 2 offenders. Mr. Kelly asked Mr. Young if it were agreeable to him, staff will place a condition that would limit the number of students to thirty, if he would ever want that number to be higher, he would have to come before the Board again. Mr. Young stated that would be agreeable with Eckerd Youth. He stated that he would hope that the Department of Juvenile Justice would have the same opportunity as well. He stated that Eckerd Youth is a contractor who responds to the needs of the area. Mr. Kelly stated that Mr. Robinson, Deputy to the Juvenile Justice Manager for the Department of Juvenile Justice nodded his head in agreement and he stated that this is something that his staff can work with. Mr. Robinson stated that there is another program that is operating in the City. He stated that the conditions mentioned would be agreeable to his Department. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Young about the buffering on the western property line. He stated that he believes that one of the things mentioned was that the students garden. He asked if Eckerd Youth could give this Board a better idea of what would be a minimum footage for the buffer area that Eckerd Youth would be comfortable with. He mentioned the staff parking area and said that it appears to be the western most developed part of the property and he would think that anything west of the north south line of the western end of the parking area could be set aside as buffer area and there would be planting done inside the fence. Mr. Young stated that it is their intention to go to the property line on the west and whatever setback is required by the County, and put up a wooden privacy fence. He stated that the fence would run along the whole property line from the pole barn to the front. He stated that from the pole barn the fence would run east and then south to tie back into the building. He stated that would be the primary activity area for the youth, the students garden in all of their programs, and the shrubbery should not be a problem. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Kelly if fencing requires a landscaping requirement. Mr. Kelly stated that a shrub is required every ten feet and there is a standard size for the shrubs, but he is not able to quote it at this time. Mr. Young stated that if it is required, they will fulfill the requirement, and they will not have an open area to the west. He stated that they are more concerned with the landscaping that will be Planning & Zoning Commission/ June 17, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 19 on rn viewed by the public. Ms. Dreyer asked Mr. Kelly if there is vegetation already there and they are not exotic, she would not want them to have to move the natural buffer out. Mr. Kelly stated that the County has some flexibility to move landscaping around and get the required landscaping in. Chairman McCurdy asked Ms. Dreyer if there were any other points that she would like to make. Ms. Dreyer stated no. Mr. Merritt asked Mr. Pratt if the landscaping would eliminate some of the problems. Mr. Pratt stated that he is not sure. Mr. Pratt asked Mr. Kelly what they plan to do with the area to the north of the pole barn. He stated that he believes the landscaping is not going to change anything. Mr. Kelly stated that nothing would be done for the balance of the property unless they come back to the Board. Chairman McCurdy asked if there were any other comments concerning this issue. Hearing no further comments in favor or in opposition to the issue, Chairman McCurdy closed that public portion of the hearing. Chairman McCurdy asked if there were any questions or comments for staff. Chairman McCurdy asked what was the pleasure of the Board. After considering the testimony presented during the public hearing, including staff comments, and the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, Ms. Dreyer moved that the Planning and Zoning Commission recommend that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners grant approval to the application of Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc., for a Conditional Use Permit to allow an educational service and facility in the I (Institutional) Zoning District with the following conditions: Limiting hours of operation. Appropriate buffers on the western property line. Assuring that the access remains where it currently is to avoid traffic issues that could affect the residential neighborhood. Planning & Zoning Commission/ June 17, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 20 Limited to non-residential students only. A limit to the number of full time students. Mr. Grande seconded the motion, and upon roll call the motion was approved 5-0. Mr. Kelly stated that he would like Mr. Pratt to give his phone number to him and he would keep him informed as to the information that will be presented to the Board of County Commissioners. Planning & Zoning Commission/ June 17, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 21 En 03 Q ��[ 0 W R JUL 2 0 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ST. LUCIE COURiY FL The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of S0% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow gallcat onal services in the I (Institutional) Zoning District REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: North side of Qrajg-e��� CURRENTLY ZONED: T (Tnstitvtiona1) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Jill y 16, 1-999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... =1AM NOT�F�OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. _ Name (Please Print): 8�z Address: Z,2z/O DATE: z2zollsigned: Ple a no a that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-003 ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC.) N 0 o JUL 1 9 19% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ST. LUCIE COUNTY FL The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50%- of the ]and area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow Fill �n the T (Institutional) Zon�nQ District. REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: North si cie of orange Ame--cue— ... u. - 00 feet Was.•-• CURRENTLY ZONED: T ( Ins tit++t innal ) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: i l y -I 6 ,-19-9 9 I AM TN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) :�OEr Address: DATE: / r43— 9 Signed: Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-003 ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC-) JUL 1 91999 COMMUNITY DEWLO?t<sENT — — cT iur.It r,'R'•4'T',. F --ro L) C-0 r,) CA k L, cck.u. al0. S t rl) P�C'L14P�`� a� 4 Soo ��N� o�� -�° (�- �cyU\� RLE-L AAAP- 0,0 � 5 c� c� amo \ o t`o b rv"N- �o cJ\ Lo- k-S NO-t t� i h� • W£, �Lso LUA C-CiLK0 �� 0- -7 0 0 D,N Lt Mo LL �\or-Y\L PC--A� fJ� F1X -C ACC) -tlb aw Mom" ro RL - bomus � ��c.•, g o `� ro� ON a� CLP -'c -A--,\0 sL l,10 S , WF- LA%Ke- --NnIS oU\Lo- wr) d0 r`. t c,J c m-t -bo Vyk UL A-0 Mo v� `ems L P vl r �L RIE(u(s�, R. 3�Q�}S M 0 y:• y+.CNf: JUL 1 6 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT S1. LUCIE COUNTY FL The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow $�11nat*ional Services in the I (Institutional) Zoning District. REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: North Ride of Orange Avenije, ��. - o i 0 -- ;._. 40 CURRENTLY ZONED: Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return -by: ji ly 16, 1-999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name ( Please Print) : Z %'/v /� (l 1 O Ly Address: fVkeTu w K A-41. 1/6 o��1 . y G6u6Ews IT (1, f g 3 L OT /D c� ry c /1>�r ,9 C DATE : 9-�&- 7 / Signed: Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-003 ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC.) (ki,- P� aj_t&� 4 M p[�C9W JUL 1 6 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ST. LUCIE COUP4TY FL The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow Educational Services in the I (Institutional) Zoning District. REGARDINGPROPERTY LOCATEDNorth •- of orangta Avenue, .•• • uiately 1,QQQ fpnt WeRt of Rock C•.o CURRENTLY ZONED: I (institutional) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: July 16, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of.the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) : 4 %ntmj 44 Address: DATE: D /ti/5 f Signed: Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-003 ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC.) The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow Educational Services in the I (Institutional) 2.oning District. REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: North Ride of Orange Avenue, ... .. nqtply 1,OOD feet Weat of Rock ;._. CURRENTLY ZONED: T (Institutional) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: July 16,. 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO _OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date, shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) : �G{QLY y �YI ri Address: q09 <SPWt&-Ss DATE: Signed: Please note that forms returned wi out a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-003 ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC.) y 7. JUL 15 1999 COMMUNITY DFVFI OPMFNT The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the ]and area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow F.eiue+_sltinnal Services in the I (Institutional) Zoning District_ REGARDING PROPERTY -LOCATED AT: North Ftida of 0range Avenup, apprnximatply 1,000 feet WPRt of Ronk ;•.• CURRENTLY ZONED: I (Institutional) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: July 16, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL IISE............ I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... er ro r within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. _ Name ( Please Print) : IV,/ T Address: ACe' E4 cfy�'W DATE: Signed: Please note that forms returned wi out a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-003 ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC.) r JUL 15 1999 COMMUNITY DEWFLOPMENT ST. LUCIE Cmir.:ry n The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 504F of the 2An—tea located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written Oppositionto the Conditional Use, a . four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County CC6M,eeionero is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To s97.,.. Bdivaatin n7 3wry rsrs 4n 0t Y trnatttu 4.... I) Nen•••Q ter iCE. CURRENTLY ZONED: S Please Return To St. Lucie county CCUM2Unity De'VelOpment FlanULA9 D1VISion 2300 Virginia Avenue Fb. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: su y I.K, , 4g9 I . I AM sx gAAMR OF THR PROPOSIM C10VDITI0NAL USE.......... I A>s[ HOT TN FAVOR OF TIM PROPOSED CONDITIONAL V88....... I "VE "o eP1rnX0N TO TIE PROPOSED COMXTIOXRL loran ....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I -am a property owner within ji.18 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): Address: DATE: -�� ✓___� Signed Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-00.3 ECMM YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC.) � *A00 uu JUL 1 5 1999 The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 504r of the land—ArA& located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a tour -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE F0LL0WING CONDITIONAL USE.- MoajjMt Bdueatienal Se s em4" *hw r (Wnmt•i h..�s.... . 'ln111 1.1 n1mt-``"` ri,et REGARDING •O• LOCATED CURRUMLY ZONED; I [ nA . nnat1 Please Return To St. Lucie County community DAV610pnent Pleading PIV;Lsion 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Jii7 y 1 fi. 14a4 I AM TN g&MR O8 THR PR0PO88D CMMXTIONAL USE ........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PR0POSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I SAva dF-UMQ a TO TM PROPOOND COMXTXONAL Van...... . I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500-feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) : %4����L/lee Address: 06 70 DATE:__-7L T4 Signed: Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-9970Q3 ZCK$RD POUTS ALT$RNATIVES INC.) CM .o JUL 15 1999 D Comm The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow Educational Services in the I (Institutional) Zonfna District. REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATEDNorth Ricin of • .•- Avenun, CURRENTLY ZONED: I (Institutional) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following -statements and return by: 7ft1 y 16, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am.a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Ze Name (Please Print): /�� !� CC°�A ulO.4/ S Address: � �l c f CC-) P, -e z y 9 sus DATE: 7 -/ 7 - S Signed : Please note that forms returned w5i�thouael4name)e and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-003 ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC.) cm JUL 1 5 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ST. LUCIE COUNTY FL The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50%- of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow Reba at -Anal services in the I (InstitLtional) Zoning District. REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: North side of Orange Avenue, itely !,00b feet West of Rock Road CURRENTLY ZONED: _ (InstitLtional) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: ,7111 y 1-6, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE. NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........ I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of�the propose Conditional Use. } Name (Please Print) : Address : ��� ')5 Iw/e /( Cl' IM DATE: Signed: x, Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-003 ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC.) i I JUL 1 5 19% ST_ LUCIE COUNTY CONDITIONAL. USE RESPONSE FORM COMMUNITY OEVELOPWNT The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 504; of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow F.ducationa'1 Services in the I (Institutional) Zoning District. REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: North side nf orange Avenue, CURRENTLY ZONED: I (Institutional) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements -and return by: July 16, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL IISE.,.....,.... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... .. V I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... i y at, as of Eh —cMte shown • G /vim �,-. y_ a Name ( Please Print) : C�y An Chen � Address: �IS �f/y 1'�✓N_ >' S� ~ h' DATE:_ Signed: Please note that forms returnwithout a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-003 ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC.) M U V ,VU iY� O JUL 1 5 1999 COMIC".UNITY DEVELOPMENT CT, :;CIS I L The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow Educational Services in.the I (Institutional) Zoning District. REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: North side of Orange Avenlie-, CURRENTLY ZONED: I (Institutional) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements_ and return by: July 16, 1999 I AM IN F = R OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE............ I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE ....... ,/:l., /... .H'Y I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE.4-. Al0 ��j�/b A) I certify that, as of the date .shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Y Name (Please Print) : %}ice tA- G C % Address: 9U /� ��: /1 tVp L 5 G 11Qi✓Xo4r i!�r DATE: &.x% ! Signed: ` Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-003 ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC.) En *00 JUL 1 5 1999 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ST. LUCIE COUNU FL The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50%- of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow Educational Services in the T (Ins trait, nnsi ) Zoning District. REGARDINGPROPERTY LOCATED ►. . Ritip of • .e.- Avenue, CURRENTLY ZONED: I (Institutional) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements And return by: Jil y 16 ,? 9 9.9- I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within ''5,0- - feet of the proposed .Conditional Use. Name '(Pl-ease Print) : Address: rr ilOm e ow►APY Lj d ue 5 R DATE: l% q Signed: ."CL^ Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CII-99-003 ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC.) '' ' y. :;, t4 �1}� i?._.:. � •_ . .., �.i � ... _� ct,w.''_ 7 2 ;::: JUL 1 4 1999 The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONAL USE: To allow Educational Services in the I (Institutional) Zoninc District. REGARDINGPROPERTY LOCATED North - .- of • _•.- Avenue, approximately 1,000 fAAt West of Rock Road CURRENTLY ZONED: _ (Institutional) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft.` Pierce, YL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements -and return by: .idyl, i699 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL IISE.........-.... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name ( Please Print) : pa (� I Crr-F-F. Address: 2.02. La 1 d da ems. uje u 1 Fk. PuAw�, FL, DATE Signed: Please note that forms returned vithout•a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. CU-99-003 ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC.) -- -+—. a CK. KtA L- 1 OK. 30b 9490924 June 1(, 1999 To: St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning Commission 2310 Virginia Avenue Ft: Pierce, Fl. 34982-5652 From: :oseph Prussiano and Corinne Richardson 1wners: Jay Gardens - Blk 1 Lots 3,4,5,6,7,8 Blk 3 Lots 15,16,17,18 & 29 Blk 4 Lots 5,6,7,14,15 glk 5 Lots 6,7,8,9,14,15,16,17,18 Blk 6 Lots 4,5,8,9,10 We are zgainst a change in zoning from CG to I for the property in fill! number RZ 99-017, North side of Orange Avenue, approx. 1,000 :'c:et West of Rock Road. We are also against a conditional use permit to allow "Educational Service" in the I zoning 4istrict for this property in file number CU 99-003. The va:.ues in Jay Gardens are already low and made even lower by having'a jail so close. We feel that the property in Jay Gardens has a t!hance to be developed into more homes for families and having "8ckerel Youth Alternatives, Inc." or any such use next to this area weld hurt that developement. Please do not approve either of these petitions. i ery t : c ly urs; Joseph f-russiano Corinne Richardson JUN � L COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT S(. LUCIE COU,1;�1 fl June 9; L999 To; St. :.ucie County Planning and Zoning Commission 23(0 Virginia Avenue Ft. aierce, F1. 34982-5652 From: hacy and Frank Bastek (cryers: Jay Gardens Lots 12,13,14,21,22 Blk 3 and Lot 38, Bik 6 Please l7,A advised that we are against a change in zoning from CG to I fir the property in file number RZ 99-017, North side of Orange Avenue, approx. 1,000 feet west of Rock Road. We are also against a Conditional Use Permit to allow "Educational Services" in the,I Zoning District for the property in file number cU 99-003. The pr.c-perty in question is right next to the Jay Gardens Sub -Division which `:� zoned residential and has already suffered from rered values.1jeeause of the jail which was built near there. We have heard that entity calling itself "Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc." -ill actually be a school and center for rehab of delinquents. We don t feel that should be next door to a residential area. Jay Garden.4 has the potential to be a place where an average family will find a'fordable housing, and that is needed more in that area than this s:11o01. Surely a more appropriate location for that use can be fout01 than next door to a residential area. In goof conscience, commissioners, you might ask yourselves if this is so:anlhing you would want next door to you. Very t-7c ly yours, Mary a. it: Frank Bastek 18031:3iscayne Blvd, Avenuu -, Fl. 33160 Not ROWE JUN 1 4 1999 COMMUNITY DEV-ELOPMENT ST. LUCIE COUNTY FL AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1999 6: 00 P.M. Petition of Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc., for a Conditional Use Permit to allow Educational Services in the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the following described property: (Location: North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet West of Rock Road) THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTIONIS AVAILABLE UPONREQUEST If it becomes necessary, these public hearings maybe continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners on July 8,1999. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on July 9, 1999. FILE NO. CU-99-003 C.r/ ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA JULY 20,1999. . . TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and in accordance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. Lode County Board of County Commissioners considertheir request as follows: . i. CASSENS LAND ENTERPRISES, INC., for a Change in Zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1" du/acre) Zoning District to the IL pndustrtal; Light) Zoning District for the following described property: . Section 25, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, from the NW corner of the NW '/4 of the SW '/4 run east 71 fee, thence South 60 fee for Ow Point of Beginning; thence South 270 feet; thence East 400 fee; thence North 270 feet, thence West 4Q0 fee to the Point of Beginning -•less road and canal right-of-way (2.48 AQ. (OR 595-877) (tax I.D. No. 1325-322-0001.000/7). (Location: 3180 North Kings Highway) 2. ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC., for a Change in Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the f (Institutional) Zoning Distrid.for the following described property: Section 11, Township 35 South, Range 39 East, the west "A of the southeast'/4 of the northwest'/4 - less the South 54 feet (10.25 (Al) (OI 218-1275) (Case # 89-14124) (OR 999-2668) . (Tax I.D. No. 2311-242-0000.)00/5).• (Location: North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,000 fed Wed of Rode Road) 3: ECKERD YOUTH ALTERNATIVES, INC" for a Conditional Use Permit to allow Educational Services in the I (InstiMional) Zoning District for the following described property: Section 11, Township 35 South, Range 39 East, the west '/4 of the southeast'/4 of the northwest 'A - less the South 54 feet.(10.25 AC) (OI 218-1275) (Case # 89-14124) (OR 999-2668) (Tax I.D. No. 2311-242400"W/5). (Location: North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet West of Rock Road) 4. WOLFGANG HOFHERR, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the manufacture of cut stone and stone products. in the IL podustrial, light) Zoning District for the Following described property. Section 35, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, Kings Highway Indus- trial Pork, Unit Two, Block A. Lots 41, 42, and .43. (Tax I.D. Nos. 1335-802-0026-000/2, 1335-802-0027-000/9, and 1335402-0028-000/6). (Location Commercial CJrcK Unit Two, Block A, Lots 41, 42, and 43 of the Kings Highway Industrial Park) 5. DANIEL A. RUBINO, for a Change in Zoning from the RS-3 (Residen- tial, Single -Family - 3 du/acre) Zoning District to the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - i du/acre) Zoning District for the following described property - Section 2, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, Indian River Estates, Unit 1, Block 2, Lots i and 2 - less the West 9 fee (Map' 34/02M (OR 624-2525) (OR 246-1445) (Tax I.D. Nos. 3402-602-0046-000/5 and 3402-602-0047-000/2). (Location: 505 East Midway Road. Southwest corner of the intersection of East Midway Road and Pinetree Drive) 6. MATT STONE, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow the.manufpct" of concrete producti in the IH pndustrial, Heavy) Zoning District for the following described property: PARCEL ONE: Commence at the northwest corner of Section 6, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida; thence run. South 00'03'38" East, along the west line of said Section 6, a distance of 49.50 fee to a point on the south line of North St. Lucie River Water Control District Canal No. 102 and the northwest corner of Lot.S of Model Land Company. Subdivision as per the plat Owed recorded In', Plat Book 4, page 34 of On Public Records of St. Ludo County, Florida,' said point being the Point of Beginning "I. From the Point of Beginning, thence run North 8905733" East, along the south line of said Canal No. 102. a distance of 888.57 fed to a paint of intersection with a curve, a radial to said point bearing North 62'5342" East; thence run southerly along the arc of a curve concave to the west having a radius of 1775.86 fee and a central angle of 12'32'02" an arc distance of 388.48 feet to a point of tangency; thence run South 103416" East, a distance of 468.82 feet to a point of curvature, thence run along the arc of a curve concave to the west having a radius of 2545.00 feet'and a central angle of 14'25'15", an arc distance of 640.55 feet to a point of tangency; thence run South 00'0 01" East, a distance of 107.96 feet; thence run North 89°50'59" East, a -distance of 120.00 fee, thence run South 00'09'01" East, a distance of 878.69 feet; thence run South 45'07108" East, a distance of 42.45 feet to a point, thence run South 00*05'14" East, a distance of 20.00 feet to a point on the north- righbof-way line of West. Midway Rood, an 80 foot wide right-of-way; thence run South 89154`46" West along said north right- of-way line of Wed Midway Road a distance of 180.00 fee, thence run North 00'05'14" West, a distance of 20.00 feet; thence run North 44'52'52" East, a distance of 42.40 feet to a pointthence run North 00'09'01' West, a distance of 631.82 feet to a non -tangent intersection with a curve, Laid point having a radial bearing to the point of North 64.45'43" East, thence nm northwesterly along the arc of a curve can - caw to the southwest having a radius of 265.00, feet and a central .angle of 35'48'18", an arc distance of 165.60 feet to a point of "envy) thence run North 61'02'34" West, a distance of 704.33 feet 0 a point of oxvdtw% hence run along the arc of a curve concave to the south having a radius of 3fi5.00 fee and a central angle of 28.59'34", an arc disk" of 184.70 fee to a point of tangency; thence run South 89°57'52" West, a distance of 182.58 fee to a point of curvature; thence run along the arc of a curve concave to the southeast having a radius of 25.00 fed and a central angle of 50'50'00", an arc distance of 22.18 fee to a point of reverse cuvolun, thence run along tiro arc of:a curve concave to." north having a radius of 70.00 fee and a central angle of 110*50'00, an arc distance of 135.41 fee to a point; thence run South 89'S7'52" West, a distance of 9.37 fee to point on the west fine of Section 6; thence run North 00'0338" West, olongyyoold west line of Section 6, a distance of 70.00 fee; thence run North 8:9'5752" east, a distance of 9.40 fee to a point on a curve with a radial to said point bearing North 60'02'08" West thence run easterly along the arc of a wive concave to the south having a radius of 70.00 fed and a central angle of 110'S0'00", an arc distance of 135.41 fee to a point of reverse curvature; thence run along the arc of a curve concave to the northeast having a radius of 25.00 fed and a central angle of 50°50'00", an are, distance of 22.18 fed to a point of tangency; thence run North 89'57'52" East, a distance of 182.58 feet to point of curva- ture; thence run easterly along the arc of a curve concave to the south having a radius of 435.00 feet and a central angle of 00'27'50", an arc distance of 3.52 feet to a point on the east line of Lot 8 of Model Land Company Subdivision; thence run North 00'0352" West along the east line of said lot 8, a distance of 618.92 fee to the northeast corner of No South's of lot 8; thence run South 89'5743" West, along the north line of the South 'A of Lof 8, a distance of 329.72 feet to the northwest corner of the South 'A of lot 8, sold corner lying on the west line of Section 6; thence run North 00'0338" West, along the west line of Section 6, a distance o! 62&90 fed to the Point of Beginning. PARCEL TWO: Commence of the northwest corner of Section- 6, Town- ship 36 South, Range 40 East, St. Lude County, Flortda;'thence run southeast, along the west line of said Section 6, a distance of 49.50 fee to a point on the south line of North St. ludo River Wafer Control Dishid Canal No. 102 and the northwest comer of lot 8 of Model land Company Subdivision as per plat thereof recorded in Plat Book 4, page 34 of the Public Records of St. ludo County, Florida; thence run North 89057'33" East, along the south line of said Canal No. 102 and the north line of Lots 5, 6, 7, and 8 of Model Land Company Subdivision, a distance of 1043.17 fee to the Point of Beginning. From the Point of Beginning continue along the south line of Canal No. 102, North 89'5733 East, a distance of 414.74 fed; trance run South 00102'27" East, a distance of 300.00 fee, trance run South 89057W West, a distance of 323.90 fee, trance run North 14'34'16" West a distance of 66.59 feet to a point of curvature; thence run northerly along the arc of a curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 2120.00 feet and a central angle of 02'51'44", an arc distance of 105.91 fee to a point of compound curvature; trance run northerly along the arc of a curve concave to the southwest having a radius of 3336.33 fee and a central angle of 02'2524", an arc distance of 141.11 fed to the Point of Beginning. (Part of Tax I.D. No. 3406-501-0034-000/0). Xocation: Proposed Midway Industrial Park. Northwest corner of- the Intersection of West Midway Road and proposed West Milner Drive). PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the Roger Poitros Administration Annex Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on July 20, 1999, beginning at 7.00 P.M. or -as loon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, 9 a person decides to appeal any decision made by a hoard, agency, or commis- sion with respect- to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. BOARD Of COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ PAULA A. LEWIS, CHAIRMAN Pub.: July 9, 1999 C RNT OF TANGENCY; BENCE RUN SOUTH OW OV 01' A DISTANCE OF 107.96 FEET: BENCE RUN NORTH 09' Na 3161 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 120.00 FEET: "NCE RUN SOUTH 00' 09' Ol' EAST. A DISTANCE OF 67BA9 FEET: ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COIIPOY COMMISSIONERS THENCE RUN SOUTH 45' Or Or EAST. A DISTANCE OF PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA 42.46 FEET TO A POW. -PENCE RUN SOUTH 00' D5' 14' DULY 20,1999 EAST. A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET TO A PONT ON THE NORM RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF WEST MIDWAY ROAD, AN 80 lO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: FOOT WIDE RIGHTCF-WAY: iFENCE RUN SOUTH B9' 64' 46• WEST ALONG SAID NORM NGHT4"AY LINE OF WEST NOTICE Is hereby given In oocordancs with Section MIDWAY ROAD A DISTANCE OF 110.00 FEET. BENCE RUN 11.00.03 of the St. Lucle County Land Devolo~ Code and NORTH 00' W 14- WEST A DISTANCE OF 20.00 FEET; THENCE In oomd mm with the provM= of to Sh. Luck County Carr RUN NORTH 44' 6r 5r EAST. A DISTANCE OF 42.40 FEET 10 prehendve Man, that Iro Iollm" applicants haft nquaMd A PONE, THENCE RUN NORTH 00' 09' 01- WEST. A DISTANCE mat Me St. Lucie County Board of Courtly Camm4sbnen can. OF 631.82 FEET TO A NON -TANGENT MERSEGTION WITH A drier their request as follows. CURVE. BAD POINT HAW40 A RADIAL TEARING TO THE POINT OF NORM 6C 4W 43- EAA: THENCE RUN NORiHBYESIFUI<Y 1. CASSENS LAND ENTERPRISES. INC. for a Charge In ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE 10 THE SOUTHWEST Zoning Mom the AR-1 VQdcu ural Reddenflal - 1 HAVING A RAM OF 265.00 FEET AND A C04M ANGLE dLfteM Zoning DUlrlot fo The L pfduddol, Wh11 Zoning OF 36' 46' 1 P AN ARC DISTANCE OF 166.60 FEET 10 A DhW for the following desalbed properly; POINT OF TWNGENC.P BENCE RUN NORM 61- Or SC WEST A DISTANCE OF 704.33 FEET 10 A POW OF CURVAiURE; SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 34 I0I111K RANGE 39 EAST. FROM THENCE RUN ALONG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE lO THE NW CORNER OF BE NW 114 OF THE SW 1/4 RUN EAST THE SOUTH HAVING A RADIIS OF 366JX1 FEET AND 71 FEET. THENCE SOUTH 60 FEET FOR iIE POINT OF A CENTRAL ANG E OF 28' Of WANARC DE ANCE OF BEGINNING. BENCE SOUTH 270 FEET. THENCE L49 400 194.70 FEET M A PONT OF TANGENCY; THENCE RUN FEET, THENCE NORTH 270 FEEL THENCE WAIST 400 FEET TO SOUTH Or 6r Sr WEST. A DISTANCE OF 182JL6 FEET W A THE POINT OF KOOM40 - LESS ROAD AND CANAL PONT OF CURVATURE: iIENCE RUN ALONG THE ARC OF A RIGM-0F WAY " AC) TOR M4771 (FAX LID. NO. CONCAVE O THE ST NVI RAM OF UR ARC 1326J22-0001 OOQr7) p� AND A CANGLE 60 0 AN DISTANCE OF 22.1I FEET iO A FONT OF REVERSE "c all= 31SO NaM Digs Highway) CURVATURE; THENCE RUN MOM THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE NORM HAVING A RADIUS OF MOO FEET 2. ECKERD YOUTH ALBERN HIVES, NC., for a Change In Zoning AD A CEMRM ANGLE OF 110' 60' OW AN ARC DISTANCE from IM CG (Conrnercial. Gonmaq Zoning DMM to Ime I OF 136.41 FEET 10 A POINT; THENCE RUN SOUTH W 6r Sr "Iffu61onc4 Zoning DW.Id for the fglowlrq described WEST, A DISTANCE OF 9.37 FEET 1O PONT ON THE WEST LIE propwy; OF SECTION 6;1FENCE RUN NORTH OP OS' 3r WREST, ALONG SAD WEST LINE OF SECTION 6. A DISTANCE OF KOM 11. TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, TIE 70.00 FEET: THENCE RUN NORTH 69' GrOr FAA. A WEST 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 - DISTANCE OF 9.40 FEET TO A PONE ON A CURVE WTM A LESS THE SOUTH 64 FEET (TOM AC) (OR 214-12751 (GTE RADIAL lO SAID POW WNW NORTH 60' 02' Or WEST; 64124) (OR 999-2668) (WC TO. NO. THENCE RUN EASMY RE ARC OF A CURVE 2511-242-212-0000-0OW6} SAVE TO THE SOUTH HAVING A RADIUS OF 70M FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 110' W OV AN ARC DISTANCE (laoobom NoAh dde df O pAvwdn. OF 13GAi FEET 10 A PONT OF REVERSE CURVATURE; apprarAtiaDety 1 A00 leaf WYst of Rock THENCE RUN ALONG THE ARC OF A CARVE CONCAVE TO Rocid) THE NORTHEAST HAVING A RADIUS OF 2LOO FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE E OF W W 00' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 3. EC103D YOUTH AL1ERNA11VES, NC., for a CandMlond use 22.18 FEET TO A POW OF TANGENCV1 THENCE RUN NORTH PenmR to allow Educallaal Services in to I pMMbral) Ir 6r 67 EAST, A DISTANCE OF 182A6 FEET TO POINT OF Zoning OWdel br the bEowhg daubed properly: CURVATURE: THENCE RUN FASTHiLYALONG THE ARC OF A CARVE CONCAVE THE SOUTH HAVING A RAM OF 43LOO SECTION 11. TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST. THE WEST FEET AD A CENIRM AI6LE OF 00' 2r 50' AN ARC 1/4 OF THE SOUTHEAST 114 OF 1HE NORTHWEST 114 - LESS THE DISTANCE OF 3.52 FEET TO A PONT ON THE FAA LIE OF SOUTH 64 FEET (1025 AC).(OR 214-12751(C49 #89-14124). LOT 6 OF MODEL LAD COMPANY SUBDIVISION; BENCE (OR 999-2"Sj (1AX ID. NO.2311.242-0000.010q. RUN NORM 00' OV 6r WEST ALONG THE EAST LINE OF BAD LOT 8. A DISTANCE OF 61 L92 FEET TA THE NORTHEAST (opium Nodh dde o(amge AVerrse. COMM OF THE SOUTH 112 OF LOT 6; BENCE RUN SOUTH appn knc** i A00 feet Wert of Rack W 6r 43- WEST, HANG 1HE NORM LINE OF THE SOUTH Vt ROOM OF LOT S. A DISTANCE OF 329.72 FEET 10 THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF iiE SOUTH 112 OF SOT 8, SAID CORNER LYING 4. WOLFGANG HOFFERR, for a Card Tonal Use Pam* 10 allow ON THE WEST LEE OF SECTION 6: i1ENCE RUN NORTH 00' the manrdacNre of cut done and done prodrsds In 1M L or 36' WEST. ALONG TWE_WEST LEE OF SECTION 4 A Wduslrial, Ughg Zoning District for the blowing described OKANNCE OF 628.90 FEET TO BE POW OF BEGINNING. property: - PARCEL TWO: SECTION 35. TOWNSHIP 34 9OUR4 RANGE 39 FAA, KiNGS HiGHM/AY IDUISUTAE. PARK, UNIT lW0.-MDCKA WA 41. 42. COWA34M AT THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 6. AND 43. (TAX LID. NOS.13361024W64M% TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH. RANGE 40 FAST. IT. LACE COUNTY. 1356802-OW-000. AND 1336 IM41=1-000/61. FLORIDA. THENCE RUN SOUTH EAST, HANG BE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, A DISTANCE OF 49.50 FEET 10 A PONT ON o x 0aa Canrnerdal apft U OlWo. RockA TTE SOUTH LEE OF NORM St. LLTCE RIVER WATER CONTROL tab 41. 42. =0 43 of to Kings Highway DISTRICT CANAL NO.102 AND THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF Irmdtrhld PUM LOT 8 OF MODEL LAND COMPANY SUIDNMW AS PER PLAT THEREOF RECORDED IN FLAT BOOK 4. PAGE 34 OF THE 5. DANIEL A OW O, for a Change in Zoning tom to RSJ PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA. THENCE (RedtleMl01. S vWfmW - 3 dolome) Zoning Dhlrbl to RUN NORTH 89 6r3r EAST, ALONG HE SOUTH DIE OF SAID the AR-1 (Apkk4Mal, Reddehik4 - i dwkcml Zoning CANAL N0.102 AND THE NORTH LEE OF LOif 5, 6. 7. AND 6 Dhhic for be blm" daulbod property: OF MODEL LAD COMPANY SUlBDMTON. A DISTANCE OF 1043.17 FEET TO BE POINT OF IEGINNA4G, SECTION 2. TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH. RANGE 40 EAST. MAN RIVER ESTATES, UNIT 1. BLOCK 2, WR 1 NO 2 - ASS NNE FROM iFE POW OF BEGINNING CONTINUE ALONG THE WEST 9 FEET 04AP 34=q (OR 624 2b2b1(OR 246.14451 SOUTH LIE OF CLANK NO.102. NORM W 6r Sr EAST A (TAX IA. NOOL 3402-M-00464100 AND DISTANCE OF 414.74 FEET; TRERCE RUN SOUTH 00' Or 2r 3402-M-OD47.000rJ). EAST. A DISTANCE OF 300A0 FEET: THENCE RUN SOUTH I9' 6r 3r WEST, A DISTANCE OF 323.90 FEET. THENCE RUN gaoaBat: 505 Ead Midway Road. SouBwwd comer NORM 1 C 34' 16' WREST. A DISTANCE OF 46J59 FEET TO at rill Ideree4, of Ead Midway load A POW OF CURVAAft THENCE RUN NORTERLYMANG If and P►seYee Or" ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE 10 AE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADRIS OF 2120M FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF Or 6. MATT ATONE. for d Candlbnal Use For" b allow the 51' 4C AN ARC DISTANCE OF IOL91 FEET TO A POINT OF n n*ochee of connaele pnooxk In Ire IN ryldudAa6 COMPOUND CURVATURE: BENCE RUN NORTHERLY HANG Heavy) Zoning D%fhtot for the following desabed p opedy: THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO iRE SOUTHWEST HAVING A RADIUS OF 3336M FEET AD A CENTRAL ANGLE OF Or PARCEL ONE 25'24' AN ARC DISTANCE OF 141.11 FEE 10 THE PONT OF SEGMAW. RARE OF TAX LD. N0. 3406-0Ot-0W4-0=4 COMMENCE AT THE NORTEEST COINER OF MCIDON 6. TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH. RANGE 40 EAST. Sr. LUCIE COUNTY. paoallon: Mopoded Midway Yidud" Pak RORCM; OENCE RUN SOUTH 00- OS'36' FAA. HANG THE Northwest corner of The ate socill n of WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 6. A DISTANCE OF 49.60 FEET TO Wed Midway Road and v 'r , d Wed MMr A POW ON THE SOUTH LIE OF NORM ST. LUCIE RIVER WATER COMM DSTRCT CANAL W.102AND BE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 8 OF MODEL TAD COMPANY PUBLIC HEARINGS will behold In me County Camnksiotr, SUBDIVISION AS PER THE PRAT THEREOF RECORDED N PLAT Chambers. 3rd floor of the Roger PoBras Administration Ana BOOK 4. PAGE 34 OF THE MRIIC RECORDS OF Sr. LUCIE Budding, 2300 Virginia Avenue. For Plerce, Florida an July 20, COUNTY, FLORIDA SAID PONT BEING THE POW OF 1999. beginning al 7:00.P.M. or as soon thereafter as passible. BEGINNING ROBI PUR2JANT TO Section 286.0105. Florida StohAes, 9 a person FROM THE PONT OF BEGINNING. THENCE RUN NORTH 69' decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or 6r3r FAST. ALONG THE SOUTH UE OF SAID CANAL NO. commission whh respect to army nxmw considered cd a ,Mael. 102. A DISTANCE OF BSSA7 FEET TO A MINT OF Ing or hearing, he will need a record of the procoedrgs, and INTERSECTION WANT A CURVE, A WK TO SAID POW that. for such purposes, he may need to ensure Bat a vabo. BFJum1C' NORTH 62* 63'4r EAR,, iiENCE RUN SOUTHERLY tlm record of me proceedings Is made. which record Includes MOM THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO SHE WEST the tedknony and evidence upon which the appeal Is to be HAVING A RADIUS OF 1775.66 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE bad. OF I 32Or AN ARC DISTANCE OF 188A8 FEE TO A POINT OF 1A4GENC-V1 HENCE RUN SOUTH 1C 34.16- FAA. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS A DISTANCE OF 444.82 FEET TO A PONT OF CUIVAUE; ST. LUCIE COUMK FLORIDA THENCE RUN HANG THE ARC OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO rd PAULA A. LEWIS. CHAIRMAN THE WEST HAVING A RADIX OF 2646.00 FEET AND A CENTRAL ANGLE OF I C 25' 1 W AN ARC DISTANCE OF 640AG FEET TO Publish: July 9, 1999 f PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION REVIEW: 06/17/99 File Number CU-99-003 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Planning and Zoning Commission FROM: Planning Manager DATE: June 1, 1999 SUBJECT: Application of Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc., for a Coflditional Use Permit to allow a Private School Establishment in I (Institutional) Zoning District on Orange Avenue Extension. LOCATION: 8500 Orange Avenue Extension. North side of Orange Avenue, approximately 1000 feet west of Rock Road ZONING DESIGNATION: I (Institutional) LAND USE DESIGNATION: COM (Commercial) _ PARCEL SIZE: 10.25 acres PROPOSED USE: Eckerd Youth Alternatives SURROUNDING ZONING: U (Utilities) to the south. I (Institutional) to the north and east. AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - Idu/acre) to the west, with a nonconforming subdivision of which several lots have been changed to RS4 (Residential, Single -Family - 4du/acre). SURROUNDING LAND USES: The existing land uses surrounding the subject property are Transportation Utilities to the south. Public Facilities to the north and east. Residential Urban to the west. There are several Institutional uses in the area. FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: Station #11 (3501 Shinn Road), is located approximately seven miles to the southwest. UTILITY SERVICE: The subject property is serviced by Fort Pierce Utilities. C�. June 17, 1999 Page 2 TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS RIGHT-OF-WAY ADEQUACY: SCHEDULED IMPROVEMENTS: TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Petition: Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc. File No. CU-99-003 The existing right-of-way width for Orange Avenue is 100 feet. None at this time. Certificate of Capacity. r STANDARDS OF REVIEW AS SET FORTH IN SECTION 11.07.03, ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE In reviewing this application for proposed conditional use, the Planning and Zoning Commission shall consider and make the following determinations: 1. Whether the proposed conditional use is in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code; _ The proposed conditional use is not in conflict with any applicable portions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 3.01.03(X)(7), I (Institutional District) Zoning District, allows educational services and facilities as conditional uses subject to the requirements of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and approval of the Board of County Commissioners. 2. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would have an adverse impact on nearby properties; The proposed conditional use is not expected to adversely impact the surrounding properties. The subject property is located on the north side of Orange Avenue in an area of Mixed uses, including other Institutional uses. 3. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would be served by adequate public facilities and services, including roads, police protection, solid waste disposal, water, sewer, drainage structures, parks, and mass transit; This conditional use is not expected to create significant additional demands on any public facilities in this area. The structure in which the proposed conditional use will be located was permitted and constructed for commercial uses. June 17, 1999 Petition: Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc. Page 3 - File No.: CU-99-003 4. Whether and the extent to which the proposed conditional use would result in significant adverse impacts on the natural environment; The proposed conditional use is not anticipated to create adverse impacts on the natural environment. The site is currently developed. This use will be inside an existing building. The proposed education service and facility must comply with all state and federal regulations concerning its operation. The applicants, Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc., have applied for the requested conditional use in order to operate an educational service and facility from their property located at 8500 Orange Avenue, approximately 1000 feet west of Rock Road in I (Institutional District) Zoning. Educational services and facilities are allowed as conditional uses in this zoning district upon approval of the Board of County Commissioners. Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc., currently operates within the City of Fort Pierce. The building which they have been leasing has been sold. Approval of this petition will allow for the continued service to the community. Eckerd. Youth Alternatives, Inc., have provided the attached descriptions of their educational programs and operations. The attached plan shows the proposed locations of buildings and other use areas on the site. These documents describe a use which is compatible for the site and consistent with both the Comprehensive Plan and the Land Development Code if the following conditions is met. The improvements to the site shall meet all St. Lucie County Land Development Code requirements. Staff finds that this petition, with the recommended condition, meets the standards of review as set forth in Section 11.07.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and is not in conflict with the goals, objectives, and policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff recommends that you forward this petition to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval which includes the recommended condition. Please contact this office if you have any questions on this matter. Attachment hf cc: County Administrator County Attorney Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc. File 2. 3. 4. 5. 7 Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations I INSTITUTIONAL Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect and environment suitable for institutional, public, and quasi -public uses, together with such other uses as may be compatible with institutional, public, and quasi -public surroundings. The number in "(r following each identified use corresponds to the SIC code reference described in Section 3.01.02(B). The number 999 applies to a us4§ not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. Permitted Uses a. Community residential homes subject to the provisions of Section 7.10.07. (ags) b. Family day care homes. (eas) C. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that the sponsoring agency or the Department of Health and Rehabilitative S'trvices (HRS) notifies the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. (m) d. Institutional residential homes. (ags) e. Parks. (m) f. Police & fire protection (922,.sn4) g. Recreational activities. (m) h. Religious organizations (a%) Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. Dimensional Regulations Dimensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. Landscaping Requirements Landscaping requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00. Conditional Uses a. Amphitheaters. (m) b. Cemeteries. (ess3) C. Membership organizations (e6) d. Correctional institutions. mn) e. Cultural activities and nature exhibitions. (sss) f. Educational services and facilities roe) g. Executive, legislative, and judicial functions. (s,.sz.93.94.95.96.97) h. Fairgrounds. (9") i. Funeral and crematory services. trn) j. Theaters. ("g) Adopted August 1. 1990 132 Revised Through 04/15/99 Section 3.01.03 Zoning District Use Regulations k. Medical and other health services. (oo) I. Postal service. (43) m. Residential care facilities for serious or habitual juvenile offenders. tom) n. Social services (ea) o. Sporting and recreational camps crow p. Stadiums, arenas, race tracks (rtu) q. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 i9s9) 8. Accessory Uses Accessory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00, and include the following: a. Drinking places (alcoholic beverages related to civic, social, and fraternal uses). (M) b. Restaurants. (Including the sale of alcoholic beverages for on -premises consumption only.) tom) C. Funeral and crematory services. cne) d. Heliport landing/takeoff pads. (m) OA e. Detached single-family dwelling unit or mobile home, for on -site security purposes. (m) f. Residence halls or dormitories. (m) Adopted August 1. 1990 133 Revised Through 04/15/99 W a> a 0 ed s w N d tm t o 8 P0 a s� >W A t° ' o a o a o� O� U U O 'w r r... .14 00 In M In - I t- i h In In �o Y) %D .n et 00 et m N N O CD O rL �O �D �O eh 110 v1 i t- .n In ON It � N a' kD st O O ON N 00 %O t- �D .n et M ON NI v' O o.IM O, O, en��n� ON O� T C 0 Co -•M O%en't .n Os SDd' N en rn �O ' II l� ; M 00 � 1'41 '�t 00 tt N et CD O 00 00 O t 00 -Kr�--� r 0 0 en M m M t-!M NMI -+iM M O� N M M M M M ON M M M aa[-`H.a.aX .aU.a>.al.ai¢U.aaI.a¢i ¢.a z; w wlUiU V. wlwiU zjwlwiw O! lOi3 a w a w U!w 8 5 C4 R j Oa�F. Na L. Szo,�mol C9 00.a p c4A►a 4 E�04O3O O00�000louzPl UzO �UnOwvO U 0o aE. o"�> z con yaUiaUi�W Ca7� A�C'a �CA�QI�W�XOX� `�' "" "XA�X (� !>C " XO9O aA CO CO O o� i U t` [q �o OO -- 3 OCQ>aoWz lb ML10 uV)m OHO Mai vf�go V'd Oe eC0^ON N O O O 00 N O� O %0 V'1 .-'� o V, t- P .-� V O 00 DD O N O 00%00 O, 1.OIO C', In �ONCNa. m ON a cn t- h - 0. 00 .-. �-+ N 00 - N - C4 .�i N w � N �O F i NO ! 1 i O! I f I y i �01, z ;° o aiQ o I N�¢ Its �41 ad Wg�� �'x� EHz�z °i0018 0� o� IMvvivoMa��D�t�Do�o.n��Ov,�o�o�t�OLn�IoM o$o$00008o oog$0000�og000�og 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 pp pp pp pp � � � � � � 00 � OOOOOOOOOOOC?_00040 N et Yl O O t- N .n M N �O O I tT oo �O O, 4 a M_ O tJ e+f .n It vl EiM N O en O O" O �O M O V O) �--� Co %D N Vl N O N N N et O O O o 0 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o o �O O O O o O o Co O 0 0 C. I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 cl O O N O !�C'q N O O o 0 ;;; O ;+ , O 1,:, 0 0 0 0 0 0 O 1Q10 O FI �O �O N �O �O enM �O lO �O T %OM M M M enIM M M en'KI en en enien en fn Mien M M M MNNNN NIP N NIN N N NIN N N "IN N N NIN N N N N J cm ITEM NO. 41 DATE: August 17, 1999 CONSENT [ ] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg. [ ] Quasi -JD. [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Community Dev. Director SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 99-140, Granting a 12 Month Extension to Resolution 97-090 which granted a Conditional Use Permit Approval for the Construction and Operation of a Car Wash Service known as Lakewood Park Autowash. BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County has received a request from the developer of the Lakewood Park Autowash for a 12 month extension to their previously approved Conditional Use Permit for the construction and operation of a Car Wash Service in the CN Zoning District. This specific use is proposed for location on the Turnpike Feeder Road, approximately 1 mile north of Indrio Road in the Lakewood Park Area of the County. On July 15, 1997, this Board Approved Resolution 97-090 granting this requested Conditional Use. This resolution included a specific requirement that this Conditional Use would expire on July 15, 1999, unless a Certificate of Occupancy were issued or an extension were granted consistent with the provision of Section 11.07.05(F) of the County's Land Development Code. Section 11.07.05(F) provides that the Board may consider one extension, of no more than 24 months, from the original date of expiration. The Board may grant an extension for a shorter period of time. Concurrent with the Conditional Use Permit granted under Resolution 97-090, the Community Development Director approved CD-97-008 which Granted Administrative Site Plan approval to the project known as Lakewood Park Autowash. This approval was to expire on July 16, 1999, concurrent with the project's Conditional Use Permit, unless either a building permit or site plan extension were granted. As of this date, construction has not started on this project. Section 11.02.06(B) (1) (a) of the Land Development Code sets out that the maximum period for which a Minor Site Plan may be extended, is twelve months from the original date of expiration. Consistent with this, staff recommends the Board limit any Conditional Use Extension to the same 12 month period. If approved, the expiration date for this Conditional Use would be July 15, 2000. If approved, a concurrent Administrative Site Plan Extension Order to CD-97-008 for the Lakewood Park Autowash will also be issued. This would effectively provide the project developer a total of 36 months from the original approval date to move forward with the construction of this project. PUNT)PUNDS AVATT, RLE : N/A. RR O MENDATTON: Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 99-140. [ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: 4-1 County Attorney: H' v Mgt & Budget: 1 M. Anderson v Administrator Purchasing: Originating Dept: Other: Other: Finance: (copies only): (AGEND467) cm ITEM NO. 41 DATE: August 17, 1999 CONSENT [ ] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg. [ ] Quasi -JD. [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Community Dev. Director SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 99-140, Granting a 12 Month Extension to Resolution 97-090 which granted a Conditional Use Permit Approval for the Construction and Operation of a Car Wash Service known as Lakewood Park Autowash. BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County has received a request from the developer of the Lakewood Park Autowash for a 12 month extension to their previously approved Conditional Use Permit for the construction and operation of a Car Wash Service in the CN Zoning District. This specific use is proposed for location on the Turnpike Feeder Road, approximately 1 mile north of Indrio Road in the Lakewood Park Area of the County. On July 15, 1997, this Board Approved Resolution 97-090 granting this requested Conditional Use. This resolution included a specific requirement that this Conditional Use would expire on July 15, 1999, unless a Certificate of Occupancy were issued or an extension were granted consistent with the provision of Section 11.07.05(F) of the County's Land Development Code. Section 11.07.05(F) provides that the Board may consider one extension, of no more than 24 months, from the original date of expiration. The Board may grant an extension for a shorter period of time. Concurrent with the Conditional Use Permit granted under Resolution 97-090, the Community Development Director approved CD-97-008 which Granted Administrative Site Plan approval to the project known as Lakewood Park Autowash. This approval was to expire on July 16, 1999, concurrent with the project's Conditional Use Permit, unless either a building permit or site plan extension were granted. As of this date, construction has not started on this project. Section 11.02.06(B) (1) (a) of the Land Development Code sets out that the maximum period for which a Minor Site Plan may be extended, is twelve months from the original date of expiration. Consistent with this, staff recommends the Board limit any Conditional Use Extension to the same 12 month period. If approved, the expiration date for this Conditional Use would be July 15, 2000. If approved, a concurrent Administrative Site Plan Extension Order to CD-97-008 for the Lakewood Park Autowash will also be issued. This would effectively provide the project developer a total of 36 months from the original approval date to move forward with the construction of this project. PUNT)PUNDS AVATT, RLE : N/A. RR O MENDATTON: Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 99-140. [ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: 4-1 County Attorney: H' v Mgt & Budget: 1 M. Anderson v Administrator Purchasing: Originating Dept: Other: Other: Finance: (copies only): (AGEND467) COMMISSION REVIEW: August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-140 DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director DATE: July 25, 1999 SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 99-140, Granting a 12 Month Extension to Resolution 97-090 which granted a Conditional Use Permit Approval for the Construction and Operation of a Car Wash Service known as Lakewood Park Autowash. St. Lucie County has received a request from the developer of the Lakewood Park Autowash for a 12 month extension to their previously approved Conditional Use Permit for the construction and operation of a Car Wash Service in the CN Zoning District. This specific use is proposed for location on the Turnpike Feeder Road, approximately 1 mile north of Indrio Road in the Lakewood Park Area of the County. On July 15, 1997, this Board Approved Resolution 97-090 granting this requested Conditional Use. This resolution included a specific requirement that this Conditional Use would expire on July 15, 1999, unless a Certificate of Occupancy were issued or an extension were granted consistent with the provision of Section 11.07.05(F) of the County's Land Development Code. Section 11.07.05(F) provides that the Board may consider one extension, of no more than 24 months, from the original date of expiration. The Board may grant an extension for a shorter period of time. Concurrent with the Conditional Use Permit granted under Resolution 97-090, the Community Development Director approved CD-97-008 which Granted Administrative Site Plan approval to the project known as Lakewood Park Autowash. This approval was to expire on July 16, 1999, concurrent with the project's Conditional Use Permit, unless either a building permit or site plan extension were granted. As of this date, construction has not started on this project. Section 11.02.06(B)(1)(a) of the Land Development Code sets out that the maximum period for which a Minor Site Plan may be extended, is twelve months from the original date of expiration. Consistent with this, staff recommends the Board limit any Conditional En `'411f/ July 26, 1999 Page 2 Petition: Lakewood Park Autowash Use Extension to the same 12 month period. This would effectively provide the developer a total of 36 months from the original approval date to move forward with the construction of this project. Attached is copy of a Draft Resolution 99-140 that, if approved, would grant a 12 month extension to the Conditional Use Permit required for the operation of the Lakewood Park Autowash. If approved, the expiration date for this Conditional Use would be July 15, 2000. If approved, a concurrent Administrative Site Plan Extension Order to CD-97-008 for the Lakewood Park Autowash will also be issued. If you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMITTED: a� U�09 Juli hewchuk Community Development Director is/ SERKIN01(a68) cc: County Administrator County Attorney County Engineer Planning Manager Robert Seddn EDAST Daniel S. M, County Atto MA RESOLUTION NO.99-140 File No.: MNSP-99-015 A RESOLUTION GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A PROJECT KNOWN AS LAKEWOOD PARK AUTOWASH WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. On July 15, 1997, this Board approved Resolution 97-090 which granted a Conditional Use Permit to Robert Serkin for the construction and operation of a self service autowash in the CN Zoning District in the Lakewood Park area of St. Lucie County, which project is to be known as Lakewood Park Autowash. 2. On July 16, 1997, the Community Development Director issued Administrative Approval Order CD-97-008 which Granted Minor Site Plan approval to the application of Robert Serkin for the construction of a self service autowash facility on the east side of the Turnpike Feeder Road, approximately 1 mile north of Indrio Road. 3. The developer of the Lakewood Park Autowash has requested that they be granted a 12 month extension to their Conditional Use permit granted under Resolution 97-090, which if approved would carry this projects approval period through to July 15, 2000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of the St. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.07(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, the Conditional Use Permit granted to Robert.Serkin for the construction and operation of a self service autowash in the CN Zoning District in the Lakewood Park area of St. Lucie County, which project is to be known as Lakewood Park Autowash, is hereby extended for an additional 12 months, which would now expire on July 15, 2000. August 17, 1999 Draft #1 Resolution 99-140 Page 1 *41/ `4w B. The property on which this Conditional Use Permit Extension is being granted is described as follows: LEGAL DESCRIPTION: Lakewood Park, Unit 12a, Block 168, Lots 18 and 19. (Parcel ID # 1312-615-0036-000/6) Location: West Side of the Turnpike Feeder Road, approximately 200 feet south of Winter Garden Parkway) C. The approvals and authorizations. granted by this Resolution for the purpose of obtaining building permits on this property, shall expire on July 15, 2000, unless the developer has obtained a building permit for this project. Pursuant to section 11.07.05(F) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, no further extensions of this Conditional Use Permit are available. D. The Conditional Use approval granted under this resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Robert Serkin, including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary development permits and construction authorizations from the appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities, including but not limited to; the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management.. District,, prior to the issuance of any local building permits of authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part B. E. The conditions set forth in Part A are an integral nonseverable part of the site plan approval granted by this resolution. If any condition set forth in Section A is determined to be invalid or unenforceable for any reason and the developer declines to comply voluntarily with that condition, the site plan approval granted by this resolution shall become null and void. F. A copy of this resolution shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. August 17, 1999 Resolution 99-140 Draft #1 Page 2 On M 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as I follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis xxx Vice -Chairman John Bruhn xxx Commissioner Cliff Barnes xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx Commissioner Doug Coward xxx PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 17th day of August, 1999 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY CHAIRMAN ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: DEPUTY CLERK 99-140A(A68) DJM August 17, 1999 Draft #1 COUNTY ATTORNEY Resolution 99-140 Page 3 'ElN00D PARK AUTOWASH, SN i 6906 CABANA LANE ♦ FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34951 Phone (561)466-3650 ♦ Fax (561)466-9262 !I R�`' J04 =. Cr` June 4, 1999 Ms. Julia Shewchuk Community Development Director ST. LUCIE COUNTY 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34932 Dear Ms. Shewchuk: am writing to you to request a Site Plan extension on the Lakewood Park Auto Wash. It was approved on a conditional use in July 1997. Since then, we have been trying to get enough financing for the project. We have been having a difficult time with this. We still have a few more avenues to explore. Because of this, we are asking for an extension on the site plan. Thank you for your time with this request. Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me at anytime. Again, thank you for your time and consideration with this request. Sincerely, Robert Serkin C U) —4•4L•— z p cY) T O p N Q O Y O � NSE� m L 0) 'o i ri ti V 2 P � '-�f �•H�,N Q y a a Q G tom` O a20 0 U V 0 Pis P a cc /� St 6 u Qy O o P Y O i _ W O O t.,/(%W G •� V a S C 9 31 <$ raaav yr ACC" ....,.,�..... 15 r�� V1RK 1 Y as f N � r Q N V7 i lv SONa ( 0111' � g w � W . i W P 9 In 9 1+1 a oa vii � ixi aroa av»n Z D OWN aaMK00aB O U Z avow W" Q avaa 7rai navy U � WOW 1 w •�� O U• oroa ,vavo aaavaR nn`` � •...... oa o"loa ,via M aoiwv7 0 ¢ /1 & avoa 033NS avoa ¢ Z LL rza �n Z W / W n <� Ix a 5 YE 1 S S£ 1 S 9£ 1 AiNnoo 33eOHO33AO o, ! 0 MMMUM 11i7lili7li Lakewood Park Autowash N DHAH 99-003 a� , 22 1 . o� 010 0 U) 0 W N1 Community Development Geographic Information Systems Map revised August 2,1999 • �L ThW my W. b— mroYE W Q—WV- +v .na .0— P-p— ' T C Mi wq ...bk, k k b W ti bow WI q mr�M 11 \`II Momrb� pnWY.1Y MY+r�0�0 Yr u� r � YpMr N6p �M1 vkmol Iwo Lakewood Park Autowash Land Use 4 3 4 3 4 3 !2 l3 /4 /5 / 2 ! 2 / 2 I 2 FBI I FJAW ki I Eden Road 0 0 W Community Development NGeographic Information Systems A Map revised August 2,1999 l m. nw fir. a -OW arv—rp—n V .d nw— www a+r1V HanWM pwtlbY. 4 4 M k—*d W r r. Wq* bW*q dxvmwl August 6, 1999 Commissioner Paula Lewis, Chairman -;- Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner John Bruhn Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 r.T Dear Commissioners: Would you want a car wash across the street from you? AUG 6 1999 D You can answer that question on August 17 when you consider the request "to approve a 12-month extension for an approved Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval to allow for the development of a Car Wash in CN (Commercial, Ne-ighbmrhood ) Zoning District." Location: West side of Turnpike Feeder Road, ap roximately 200 feet south of Winter Garden Parkway. (Lakewood Park Just as a refresher..... about a year ago, one person requested a site plan approval for a car wash in a Commercial, Neighborhood Zoning District. The Planning',and Zoning Commission informed them that was not an allowed use but why didn't they ask the law be changed to allow it as a Conditional Use. Uan you imagine THAT!!!! Our own Planning and Zoning suggested a detrimental law change to satisfy one person and did not consider the desires of hundreds of other persons affected thereby. But then, as has been stated before, publicly, Planning and Zoning says yes to anything. Many businesses, like Harbor Federal, Riverside National Bank, Nations Bank, Lakewood Medical and indrio Shopping Center, etc. have built beautiful and architecturally pleasing buildings in the area that would be a credit to St. Lucie West business areas. Do we want to put in a car wash to begin this area's decline into looking like U.S. 1? I can see only one short --term benefit for approving this site plan and that is maybe it will add to St. Lucie County's tax rolls.... it certainly isn't for job creation. Self service car washes are unattended. However, it won't add to the tax rolls for very long because, were I an immediate resident, I would immediately ask for a reduction in my home appraisal for tax purposes. Is there any doubt that my home would de- preciate in value? So, where are your increased values for the tax rolls? We know th 're..have been robberies at other self service car washeit. Do we want that for Lakewood Park? NO!!! Do we want to hear loud boom boxes during the night.... car washes are open 24-hours a day. In case you are not familiar with the area, we have manufactured home area nearby. These are very special manufactured homes. Each one is on a full house lot and has its own well and septic tank. S(5:`eaoh one of these lots can support a regular house, if and when so desired. Can you imagine anyone building a lovely new house nearby a car wash? In the long run, doesn't this affect your potential appraisals for tax purposes? *also, Now Of course, you may say don't you already have;•a small auto repair and a filling station nearby? Yes we do, BUT, how did they get approved? Were they legally approved for a CN zoning area? Probably not but just because one mistake was made, do we need to continue downgrading the area? 0'n January 8, 1997 the Department of Community Development sent a Memorandum to the Planning and Zoning Commission containing the following text: "..justification for a change to the text of the CN Zoning District to allow self-service car washes in the CN Zoning District were given for the Lakewood Park area only. No justification has been demos- trated for self-service car washes in the county as a whole. Staff is concerned that this use may not be compatible in the majority of the CN Zoning Districts.,, What an insult to Lakewood Park to be considered "compatible". WOULD YOU WANT A CAR WASH ACROSS THE STREET FROM YOU???? Res • e ctful yours, / C afire ``g1a r, Lakewood Park on .­F_7 I AUG 4 The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. _+ _+ - +M�11 Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 13, 1999 - I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE ....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) : {- Address: / © if V , r /. l-e DATE: O - %�i J� Signed: Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. DHAH-99-003 ROBERT SERKIN a/k/a LAKEWOOD PARK AUTO WASH) CM AUG l 0 1999 nna!FNT The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. •• ••••• • • •jimmootgn,106,,.• • •_ •ilg1= - + c • • •• • M. • • •• WX . VIA • • . • • • , • • • • • .. • Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 13, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) : }���G1L �cz_2 0 ce_ Address: DATE: r rt Signed: Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. DRAH-99-003 ROBERT SERKIN a/k/a LAKEWOOD PARK AUTO WASH) - -� I �,�nj 8T. LUCIE COUNTY AUG i 0 CONDITIONAL. IISE RESPONSE FORM _ The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. • • • • • • • 1 • • 11 • CURRENTLY ZONED: CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 13, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name ( Please Print) : _MILQ E j) t4 Address: 117 7 Lb ed Vo r(b _5 12 DATE: Signed: 1 \aA,,,X/ / ,a „[ Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public. record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. DHAH-99-003 ROBERT SERKIN a/k/a LAKEWOOD PARR AUTO WASH) 0 M Viz' AUG 1 sT The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners. is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. .�_ .• /. .._ .� . . M/_ R, REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATEDwest side nf Turnpike Ft-edt-r :•.•A approximately 200 feet south of Winter Gardgn Parkway Please Return To St. Lucie County Conmiunity Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: ALg]ust 13_, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional //JJ��//seU. Name (Please Print): CS7DY/�r A') ��6�F� 4- Address: �a '�US 0P )"' P Fj f -erce 3 G s DATE: Signed: Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. DHAH-99-003 ROBERT SERRIN a/k/a LAKEWOOD PARR AUTO WASH) M AUG 1 U ^ 9 i The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. • • • .. • . • • • - -V211M AMOMMUMM _•• •. u. - �� -- • • - •-� . • • GO •LPN= _ •. •• ••• Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 13, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... V I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) : � 0)r4 4 6eo is e Phe,[Ari Address: MIMI Mv"d �' : I -- . V 1 eeae , fi t, 3gg,s 1 DATE: T -S -9 1 Signed: Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. DHAH-99-003 ROBERT SERRIN a/k/a LAKEWOOD PARR AUTO WASH) M cm The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 5.00 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. a a • . • - . a . _ .• . a • . . *T _ _ - c tip 11i,im, / = ..: . on. = c / c .� a N� •iP�1= c • / •• .••• • }• • •yn,c + a • q •• / ••• 91 Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 13, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) : e Address : �� D�-} 4S)Aoe_A DATE: 1�-S %i Signed: Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. DHAH-99-003 ROBERT SERKIN a/k/a LAKEWOOD PARK AUTO WASH) *we M C R il r 4 �i cT t+ t 't, Fl The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. NMI M. djL Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 13, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. % Name ( Please Print) : L. Address: _&) V �- RUE DATE: Signed: Please not that forms return d without a name.and addre will not be considered. Also note that returned forms a e a e -of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. DHAH-99-003 ROBERT SERKIN a/k/a LAKEWOOD PARK AUTO WASH) 9DD ( P) I I AUG 1999 cT ric ; i. FL The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. WON • lip • - • • • • • _ • • 0 • • : 1 c - = Oil • • • • • . • • • • , • on• Me - • • M MoIp11 - • •� • • • I Please Return To St. Lucie County, Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 13, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... / I AM (!!�F THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... !/ I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner_ within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name ( Please Print) : L e Address: 3 CAP'B j Z�} R_0A'�) CC C/+ Iy O '7 -7 1 y DATE: Signed: Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. DHAH-99-003 ROBERT SERRIN a/k/a LAKEWOOD PARR AUTO WASH) cm R , `'r � IT_._.-__ ___ ___ R� AUG 1 1 1999 - n E L 0• s` FL The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. a a / • 1 • - • ej c • • • • • • • 9 = 1 c - = 7�1 • / a RIL • •• ••• • • 1 CURRENTLY ZONED: CH (Commercial, Neighborhood) Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 13, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... yes - X I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within-500 feet of the proposed. Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) : Man fYe $ M aI etzLg Address: 9)2 Ja.S"Ine Lake Vero Beach, rL. 3.2963 c� O DATE: _7� (9 Signed:1 i( T Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. DHAH-99-003 ROBERT SERRIN a/k/a LAKEWOOD PARR AUTO WASH) Lwn Ci0.it3lf lt,_I{i4 i; T cE The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. • •• ••••• • • • P0 • A • � � •WW1= � _ • • •• � ••• Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Aiiqust -13 , 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name ( Please Print) : Ln(.Rcttuz"'- Address: 530a �utZ ��Z, DATE: 8 W /qoi Signed: Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. DHAH-99-003 ROBERT SERKIN a/k/a LAKEWOOD PARK AUTO WASH) AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1999 6: 00 P.M. Petition of Robert Serkin alkla Lakewood Park Auto Wash, for a 12-month extension to their previously approved Conditional Use Permit for the construction and operation of a Car Wash Service in the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District for the following described property: (Location: Westside of Turnpike Feeder Road, approximately 200 feet south of Winter Garden Parkway) THE PROPERTY'S LEGAL DESCRIPTION IS AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST If it becomes necessary, these public hearings maybe continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Prior to this public hearing, notice of the same was sent to all adjacent property owners on August S, 1999. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on August S, 1999. FILE NO. DHAH-99-003 En 0 ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: ' NOTICE Is hereby given in accordance with Section 11.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and in accordance with the provisions of the St, Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: 1. ANTHONY COSCIA ✓k SONS, LC, for a Change in Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning Distrid to the HIRD (Hutchin- son Island Residential District) Zoning District for the following described property: A parcel of land located on Hutchinson island In Section 34, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, more particularly described as follows: Begin at a point of Intersection of the north line of the south 2577.66 feet of the north 2858.86 feet of said Section 34 and the westerly right-of- way line of SR Ally thence run South 20 deg 23 min 08 sec East along said westerly right-of-way line a distance of 440.00 feet, to a point; thence run North 72 deg 24 min 10 sec West a distance of 686.20 feet more or less to the easterly mean high water line of the Indian River, thence northerly along said mean high water Ilya a distance of 215.00 feet more or less to sold north line of the south 2577.66 feet of the north 2858.86 feet of sold Section 34; thence run North 89 deg 59 min 38 sec East along said previously described north line a distance of 459.00 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning (181 AC) (Map 35/34N1q (OR 1221.1734) (Tax I.D. No. 3534.111-0004.000/8). (Locatiom West side of South SR A-1-A, directly across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase 2) 2. FORT PIERCE AIR CENTER (Ernesto Velosco, Agent) has applied for a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County International Airport. The proposed Major Adjustment Is to construct a 12,000 square foot hangar (Hangar 13) for the following described Be0 ginnnninng at the southwest comer of Section 29, Township 34 South, Range 40 East run South 89.31'34" East 30.00 feet to a Point lying on the south line of said section; thence run North.00'26'26' East 625.11 feet parallel to the west line of said Section to a point, thence run South 87'51'34' East 36.09 feet to a point, said point being the Point of Beginning; from sold Point of Beginning run South 87.51'34" East 668.83 feet to a point; thence run North 45*15'26" East 515.68 feat to a point, thence run North 44'42'34" West 1314.92 feet to a point, sold point being the P.C. of a curve concave to the west, having a delta angle of 30'04'00" and a radius of 1294.52 feet, thence run In a southerly direction along the arc of said curve 678.55 feet to a point, said point being the P.T. of sold curve; thence run South 45*17"26 West 100 feet to a point, thence run South 00'2226" West 540.00 feet to a point, sold point being the Point of Beginning. All lying In Section 29, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. (Tax I.D. No. 1429.323-0002-000/6). (Location: 2982 Curtis King Boulevard, St. Lucie County International Airport, Hangar 13) 3. CROCE GIAMBANCO, for a Change In Zoning from the CG (Com- merdal, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the following described property: Section 6, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, that part of the south 'A of the northwest''/4 of the northeast 'A lying west of U.S. 1 and east of IN turnpike feeder road; begin at the Intersection of the west right-of-way of U.S. 1 and the south line of the south 'A of the northwest '/4 of the northeast '/4; thence run west along the south line 220.60 feet to the easterly right-of-way of Turnpike Feeder Road; thence northeasterly along the rightof-way 317.20 feet; thence turn 90 deg and run South 62 deg 36 min 04 sec East 97.75 feet to, the westerly right-of-way of U.S. 1; thence southerly along the right-of-way 245.90 feet to the Point of Beginning. (OR 1150-614) (Tax I.D. No. 1406.124-0002-000/4). (Location: 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1) 4. LENE HADDEN, for a Conditional Use P R to allow a family isf tial home within 1,000 feet of another family residential oo-r file following described property 5, Township 35 South, Range 40 East, S mi Park No. 1, Block ts 13 and 14, less the south 10 feet (0.31 A ( R 1219-2857) (Tax o. 2405-501-0104-000/6). tion: 3120 Avenue O) KEWOOD PARK AUTOWASH, to cep ov a 12-'month extension n approved Conditional Use Permit a Si Plan Approval to allow e development of a Car Wash in C mercial, Neighborhood) ng District. ion 12, Township 34 South, Re 39 East, Lakewood Park - Unit , Block 168, Lots 18 and p 13/12S) (OR 1095-2992) (Tax o. 1301-615-0036 6). Turnpt Feeder Road, opproximately.200 feet h of Winter Garden P )REIDA MCNA , a Conditional use Permit to allow a family ential thin 1,000 feet of another such family residential e f [lowing described property: Section 32, Township 34 South, Range 40 East, Sheraton Plaza, Unit Four Replat, lot 302 (OR 216-1958) (Tax I.D. No. 1432-807-0060-000/51. (Location: 3009 Anderson Drive) 7. PIPPIN TRACTOR, for a Change in Zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, General) for the following described property: All that certain had of parcel of land lying, being and situated in Section 25, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, Florida and this - tract being more particularly described as follows: Commencing at the southwest corner of Section 25, Township 34 South, Range 39 East, thence North 00°0e,18" East, along the west line of said Section 25, a distance of 2655.28 Feet to a point, thence North 89'43'39" East, a distance of 70.98 feet to a point in the east right-of- way line of Kings Highway, thence North 00*01'15" East, 30.00 feet along the east dghtof-way of said Kings Highway, and the Point of Beginning of the herein described tract of land; thence North 00'0.1'15" East, along the east right-of-way line of said Kings Highway, a distance of 224 to a point; thence North 89*46'12" East, a distance of 46 feet a point; thence South 00*01'15" West, a distance of, 4 to point; thence South 89'43'39" West, a distance of Point of Beginning and containing 2.42 acres of land, e or 1 of Tax I.D. No.1325-233-0000-000/7). ovation: si of Kings Highway, approximately V2 mile north of St. Lucia Bout ` PUBLIC I GS will be held in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor a agar Poitras Administration Annex Building, 2300 R Pierce, Florida on August 17, 1999, beginning at thereafter as possible. TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, if a person I any decision made by a board, agency, or commis - to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he cord of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he nsure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, cludes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal BOA1t9.QF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ PAULA A. LEWIS, CHAIRMAN Pub.: Aug. 5, 1999 _n1C l'lco'1 S No. 0105 ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMd NERS PUBLIC HEARING AGENDA AUGUST 17, 1999 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: NOTICE is hereby given in accordance with Section 1 1.00.03 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code and In accordance with the provisions of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, that the following applicants have requested that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners consider their request as follows: 1. ANTHONY COSCIA & SONS, L.C., for a Change in Zoning from the CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning District to the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District for the following described property: A PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED ON HUTCHINSON ISLAND W SECTION 34, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 41 EAST, ST. U1CIE COUNTY, FLOROk MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: BEGIN AT A POINT OF INTERSECTION OF THE NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 2577.66 FEET OF THE NORTH 2858.86 FEET OF SAID SECTION 34 AND THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LIVE OF SR ALA; THENCE RUN SOUTH 20 DEG 23 MIN 08 SEC EAST ALONG SAID WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE A DISTANCE OF 440.00 FEET, TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 72 DEG 24 MIN 10 SEC WEST A DISTANCE OF 686.20 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE EASTERLY MEAN HIGH WATER LINE OF THE INDIAN RIVER: THENCE NORTHERLY ALONG SAID MEAN HIGH WATER LINE A DISTANCE OF 215.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO SAID NORTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 2577.66 FEET OF THE NORTH 2858.86 FEET OF SAID SECTION 34; THENCE RUN NORTH 89 DEG 59 MIN 38 SEC EAST ALONG SAID PREVIOUSLY DESCRIBED NORTH LINE A DISTANCE OF 459.00 FEET MORE OR LESS TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING (3.81 AC) (MAP 3W34WO (OR 1221-1734)(TAXI.D. NO. 3534-T11-0004-00WO). (Locallon: West side of South SR A-1-& dkecty across from the Regency Island Dunes, Phase 2) 2. FORT PIERCE AIR CENTER (Ernesto Velasco, Agent) has applied for a Major Adjustment to the existing Conditional Use at the St. Lucie County international Airport. The proposed Major Adjustment is to construct a 12,000 square foot hangar (Hangar 13) for the following described property: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST RUN SOUTH 89.31'34" EAST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT LYING ON THE SOUTH LINE OF SAID SECTION; THENCE RUN NORTH 00' 2626' EAST 625.11 FEET PARALLEL TO THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION TO A POINT, THENCE RUN SOUTH 87.51'34' EAST 36.09 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING; FROM SAID POINT OF BEGINNING RUN SOUTH 87' 51'34' EAST 668.83 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 45' 15'26' EAST 515.68 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN NORTH 44' 42'34' WEST 1314.92 FEET TO A POINT, SAID POINT BEING THE P.C. OF A CURVE CONCAVE TO THE WEST, HAVING A DELTA ANGLE OF 30" 04W AND A RADIUS OF 1294.52 FEET; THENCE RUN IN A SOUTHERLY DIRECTION ALONG THE ARC OF SAID CURVE 678.55 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE P.T. OF SAID CURVE; THENCE RUN SOUTH 45' 17'26' WEST 100 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE RUN SOUTH 00.22'26" WEST 540.00 FEET TO A POINT; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF BEGINNING. ALL LYING IN SECTION 29, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA. (TAX I.D. NO. 1429-323-0002-000/6). (Locallon: 2982 Curls King Boulevard, St. Lucie County International Airport: Hangar 13) 3. CROCE GUAMBANCO, for a Change In Zoning from the CG (Commercial, General) Zoning District to the I (Institutional) Zoning District for the following described property: SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, THAT PART OF THE SOUTH 1/s OF THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 LYING WEST OF U.S. I AND EAST OF THE TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD: BEGIN AT THE INTERSECTION OF THE WEST RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. 1 AND THE SOUTH LINE OF THE SOUTH 1/2 OF THE NORTHWEST 114 OF THE NORTHEAST 1/4 THENCE RUN WEST ALONG THE SOUTH LINE 220.60 FEET TO THE EASTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF TURNPIKE FEEDER ROAD; THENCE NORTHEASTERLY ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY 317.20 FEET; THENCE TURN 90 DEG AND RUN SOUTH 62 DEG 36 MIN 04 SEC EAST 97.75 FEET TO THE WESTERLY RIGHT-OF-WAY OF U.S. 1; THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG THE RIGHT-OF-WAY 246.90 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING. (OR 1150.614) (TAX I.D. NO. 1406-1244)002.000/4). *10111111i (Location: 6609 North U.S. Highway No. 1) 4. MARLENE HIDDEN, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1,000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described property: SECTION S. TOWNSHIP 35 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, SUNRISE PARK NO. 1, BLOCK 5, LOTS 13 AND 14, LESS THE SOUTH 10 FEET (0.31 AC) (OR 1219-2857) (TAX I.D. NO. 2405-501-01044M6). (Location: 3120 Avenue O) S. LAKEWOOD PARK AUTOWASH, to approve a 12-month extension for an approved Conditional Use Permit and Site Plan Approval to allow for the development of a Car Wash in CN (Commercial, Neighborhood) Zoning Dish. . SECTION 12. TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, LAKEWOOD PARK - UNIT 12-A, BLOCK 168. LOTS 18 AND 19 (MAP 13/12S) (OR 1095-2992) (TAX I.D. NO. 1301.615.00M-OOW6). (Location: West side of Turnpike Feeder Road, appro*natey 200 feet south of WRder Garden Parkway) 6. DREIOA MCNAIR, for a Conditional Use Permit to allow a family residential home within 1.000 feet of another such family residential home for the following described property: SECTION 32, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST, SHERATON PLAZA, UNIT FOUR REPLAT, LOT 302 (OR 216-1958) (TAX I.D. NO. 1432-807-0060-OM5). (Locaton: 3009 Anderson Drive) 7. PIPPIN TRACTOR, for a Change in Zoning from the AR-1 (Agricultural, Residential - 1 du/acre) Zoning District to the CG (Commercial, General) for the following described property: ALL THAT CERTAIN TRACT OF PARCEL OF LAND LYING, BEING AND SITUATED IN SECTION 25. TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA AND THIS TRACT BEING MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF SECTION 25, TOWNSHIP 34 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST; THENCE NORTH 00 06'48" EAST, ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID SECTION 25, A DISTANCE OF 2655.28 FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89' 43'39' EAST, A DISTANCE OF 70.98 FEET TO A POINT IN THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LIVE OF KI IM HIGHWAY; THENCE NORTH 00' 01 *15" EAST, 30.00 FEET ALONG THE EAST R 49-OF WAY OF SAID KINGS HIGHWAY, AND THE POINT OF BEGINNING OF THE HEREIN DESCRIBED TRACT OF LAND; THENCE NORTH 0(r 011'1 W EAST, ALONG THE EAST RIGHT-OF-WAY LINE OF SAID KINGS HIGHWAY, A DISTANCE OF 224.85, FEET TO A POINT; THENCE NORTH 89. 46'12- EAST, A DISTANCE OF 468.36 FEET TOA POINT: THENCE SOUTH 00' . 01'15" WEST, A DISTANCE OF 224.54 FEET TO A POINT: THENCE SOUTH 89' "39"WEST. A DISTANCE OF 468.36 FEET TO THE POINT OF BEGINNING AND CONTAINING 2.42 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS (PART OF TAX I.D. NO. 1325-233-0000-WO/7). (Localon: East side of Kings Highway. apprwdmafey 'A mile north of St. Lucie Boulevard) PUBLIC HEARINGS will be held in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the Roger Polros Administration Annex Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida on August 17, 1999, beginning at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. PURSUANT TO Section 286.0105, Florida Statutes, If a person decides to appeal any decision made by a board, agency, or commission with respect to any matter considered at a meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal Is to be based. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ PAULA A LEWIS. CHAIRMAN Publish: August 5, 1999 i (3+ } N h v h v h v h v .-. h v 00 et v O b O N " a v V; ON v .-r ;1 O� v —" O� v I� o 00 b v V1 O, v V1 ON v 00 O\ v C. en M N O .• V1 Os v V1 Q\ v V1 �f O� v .-r V1 O� v b V1 V' M V1 Q\ v V1 D\ v V1 O� v V1 O+ v V' O� v Y1 O� v h a\ v DD 00 O� N .--� h 01 v h O� v .Ni O v 000, O, v h Cl v h O� v h O� v h O" E M en M M M en en rn M en M M M M M M �--� M M en M O m M M M M m M M M M v �'a i�.`.4wi�wwwwpF� �aaaax www�wwt�`waE�wwwik�i�wwwwwww`waww%ww t I i i 1 auetwicwi� xax leiE�gO aaaa ���C', FH WRi axaw F�1HAA U xx E�E�k�E�3ggvl°°E�E�E� � � aaxxxx i�Utwi��i 119104 � �o?y�a ��cwi ,�j a aaaaawOrna.aa°a r.� aaGaa v�av�pFaaa.aOaaaWa.aa�aa. wwo4►a H a!a:ww F wwa F F y F acs:a:ma4�: H F d F F a�naaa F aaaaa: F F F F U 000000 wwwwww 0000000[[--� a.wwwFaawaGT.C7wwww OOOO�o00 www 000w00 www�nwwmwawww 00000 3 > po � i M O 3d3 xN Wg a 3a°.a A '3 Wax 3z�,ddd��88 W 3 x ,n W�3�d o �00a 00w� �> p00MINWOw o �. x X aw w 0w3a�n C7 d a waa'" Ow�a� c�Aow w00 3 �d m�9�nOaav�v�v� W�,�PP Oda O x w w b mAoav� vv1mO mv1tiN w M 0 _� 0o O .-• 00 DD I� O+ r. 0 00 b o N Y1 O LL C. O 00 N N N O N .• 00 .r ;o M O .� O Ar a0 M .. [� O 00 b b .-. .-. 0 O N O b O= M v1 �--� .-. t- r [- .. N N �n O Qi O 0 v1 .. .•. M v1 N .. �--� O .-+ .cr vi O (� t- b P b v) O� N r- t� .-. N v'f v1 N .•. O N I 0a U a c7 N zz d vwi a Cj vi z c� c� c� o p U 0 A. z U F> d W w >� � w qazWtN°�A awH �a 'N d az aaApza�y 04WWx0 gg��v Cv��3A4 rt�A��pF; adlpacw��-,d who > U�3 �3H�FCY a''ao°C zUa�o° Ro c7 w °q�Fi,�C►~aa�3a`pwa 0 o z ao A ..ivies -a p A A3awxo -aOw - oz AwFrcr��7CO) a eW�O0 R 3a Z �awaaWxx mmUU ppooppQ C�UUAu7Www aOx da WW rr� `aa aaxr�0 C7C7C7 x�DC..aazzzz 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0$ 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0$ 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 fV M O 0 O o O 0 M O O o N 0 O O r- O 0 O C O 0 o O 0 00 O 0 O o 0 h O o 0 o O 0 b N O o .-� M O 00 00 O M O O O 0� O b V1 O 00 0 O N O 0 O CD 0 ao 0 M l� 0 M a0 0 O M 0 O 0 0 N— n 0 0 0o N 0 b V1 0 O\ b 0 O 8 b O 0 8 0 O 0 a0 W 0 O O 0 0 b M O ov�o:nav�v��n000v�v�v��n�vi�nv�ov��nov�o V. �o g �c o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o C %o o 0 �o 0 �o 0 �o 0 o 0 v �o 0 tnW*.ti �o 0 o 0 �o 0 0 4 0 0 0 o o o 0 0 M M o M o M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M 0 M M o M o M — o M c M o M 0 M 0 M M o M 0 M 00 M M M 0 M 0 M 0 M M o M a H 3 O a b 0 0 w w tn 0 0 U tn 0 a, o� a :r w y a ow IN N C11 ro,vo,C) O l- Vl a\ N O M r-CS �a �O V'1 l- � N M N W) C�CN M 00 T O w oa, V1 en �D �--� `M 3 M M �--� en M M M M z wzlw�w _I. d � aa.a w w w� aaaadaw w w w w a IIII i � U 04 I ! U w a w 0�d�d9"1zR U U O j Ig U Zo U ' F g aa��0000a���Ha�� F 0 v a Fo o xxxaxxo+dcG o F d uo F F F g F U o 0 o4y 0000ao w_3_waoow w alaa.wv�w _ > F A W ua dFw,z jdww� W qp �a >cnM mwzz �O�a4 as Aq 'y'"� Cc1c�FF d 8 0 bIU O M C. M O O rn N_ o O p" h fh O b N ti I E i � z N A ooy � a F � Z � U a a �� �23 ga a x�a aUa 0 a U�3 a 4d ca � �g a d amm-g0at7ag O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O 0 O O 0 O 0 O o O 999999099999.999. O M OQOQOOOO .: M M a1 n w N M g ON h D\ w M 'a O O a\ O N g O t- w O v O D\ N 000 n N g �O G O O O O O O O O O O O O O O O 00 �o�00000000000a M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M M 0 r ITEM NO. 41 vim` ,ST LUCIE COUNTY CON*DTT - -L• USE RESPONSE FORM Alit GOM.MUNI DEVU05PNAEPIT ST. LUCIE CGUPWTf, FL The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. REGARDINGPROPERTY LOCATEDAT: Wi-st side of n• - Feeder Road, ately 11 feet southof Winter Gar•-• ' CURRENTLY • 1 y\ (rommernial, Neiar7a-,orhood)_ Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Ague . 13, 199 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below,_ I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) : Address: �70 < �� ©i✓� Cot - DATE: � I Signed: 1 `1 Please note that forms returned without a name and a ess will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. DHAK-99-003 ROBERT SERKIN a/k/a LAKEWOOD PARR AUTO WASH) *40, cm �tE�� 1 AUG L I v i L � Ls' COMIMUNO NV771.0?',TENT ST. it"C1E %(Y!NTY fl The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: West Ride of Turnpike Feeder Ro . • • • 11.itely 200- - - Routh •--- -ntpr - - --• - Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division .,. 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Augu s _ 11, 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... !� I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) : m form, / E d 4 !/J9 Address: 91 `% W/ N T a 9 91t Xcl 3�/Qs / DATE: Signed: Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. DHAH-99-003 ROBERT SERKIN a/k/a LAKEWOOD PARK AUTO WASH) 05 0 E ' AUG 1 6 1999 � COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FL The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth -(4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. REGARDING• •CATED AT: West sicip of • - - • - ; • . • •• •. 11. - 11 ---t-- sniith of - •- 1;: • 47 M.yule - /.. .11 Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: Aiqust 13,1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE ....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner. within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print) : 4 P, E 00r, r /c3S Address : / U( / r� D eL 1-1 a f j,4r 3 Y �1%t %�1 e-�-Ge, %lore ✓� `��--y<5�/ DATE: 8 �, g /�,�j Signed: Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. DHAH-99-003 ROBERT SERKIN a/k/a LAKEWOOD PARK AUTO WASH) on e +' AUG 1 6 1999 ua J Cuirii 1!°' V uEy'�h ??1EidT The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. MC-4. MqZ9. q.) REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: Wt-c;t side nf Turnpike Feeder Road, .•• •. u.tely 200 fept southnf Winter •-• • Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division .2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: A1191'st 13, 1 99 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner within 500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. p1,, IT) Name (Please Print) : DO 1 Address: DATE: I Si, Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. DHAH-99-003 ROBERT SERKIN a/k/a LAKEWOOD PARR AUTO WASH) On cm `.i AUG 1 6 1� 9 _i COMMUMiTY DDHONAENT ST. LUCIE C,UiiiY, fl The St. Lucie County Land Development Code requires that if the owners of 50% of the land area located within 500 feet of the proposed site provide written opposition to the Conditional Use, a four -fifth (4/5) vote of the Board of County Commissioners is required to approve the proposed Conditional Use. REGARDING PROPERTY LOCATED AT: west side nf Turnpike Ppedpr Road, approximately 201 ---i- gouth of . • - •- • • 4� • + • • + • • • Please Return To St. Lucie County Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Please check only one of the three following statements and return by: August 11,_ 1999 I AM IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE........... I AM NOT IN FAVOR OF THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... ` " I HAVE NO OPINION TO THE PROPOSED CONDITIONAL USE....... I certify that, as of the date shown below, I am a property owner_ within500 feet of the proposed Conditional Use. Name (Please Print): Address: �`7Z� Srn t� HILL 113 L ► ECI N LJ PN f:fT- PPMC�L, F-CA DATE: ��� "� / Signed: Please note that forms returned without a name and address will not be considered. Also note that returned forms are a matter of public record and available for viewing upon request. (FILE NO. DHAH-99-003 ROBERT SERRIN a/k/a LAKEWOOD PARR AUTO WASH) n cm ITEM NO. 4J DATE: August 17, 1999 CONSENT ( ] REGULAR ( ] PUBLIC HEARING ( X ] Leg. [ X ] Quasi -JD. [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: rommunity Development ommunity Dev. Director GTRT._T: Consider Draft Ordinance 99-003, Amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to Provide for Additional Standards and Regulations Governing Land Clearing And Yard Trash Recycling Operations in the Unincorporated Areas of St. Lucie County. RACK,ROT iND: Draft Ordinance 99-003 proposes a series of amendments to the County's Land Development Code addressing the specific use of Land Clearing And Yard Trash Recycling Operations. In general, this ordinance provides for the following: This draft ordinance provides for the addition of Five (5) new definitions for Construction and Demolition Debris, Land Clearing Debris, Land Clearing Operation, Land Clearing and Yard Trash Recycling Operations and Yard Trash. sPrtion 3.01.03 Zoning Districts, • This draft ordinance provides for clarification as to the requirement that Land Clearing And Yard Trash Recycling Operations are only authorized conditional uses, subject to meeting certain specific standards. GPction 7.10.12 Sul) lem a al Standards: Scrap, Waste and Reryc ing O= aPr t `ions • This draft ordinance adds a new paragraph "C" to this section, providing specific standards for all Land Clearing and Yard Trash Recycling Operations. These standards will apply to all new operations and to all existing Land Clearing and Yard Trash Recycling Operations as of January 1, 2001. on July 20, 1999 this Board opened the second of the two required public hearings on the proposed ordinance. Following the acceptance of public comments on this matter, the board continued any further deliberations on this matter until August 17, 1999. FUNDS AVAILABLE- N/A PREVIOUS ACTTON: The Planning and Zoning Commission met on May 20, 1999, to review this matter. At that meeting the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend that Draft Ordinance 99-003 be approved. On July 20, 1999 this Board opened the second of the two required public hearings on the proposed ordinance. Following the acceptance of public comments on this matter, the board continued any further deliberations on this matter until August 17, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Draft Ordinance 99-0 rQMP9RTQN ACTION, [ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: DiGgl M. Anderson Coun Administrator County Attorney: Originating Dept: Finance: (copies only): Mgt & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: (AGEND468) t ,ern, �rri` COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: August 17, 1999 Ordinance 99-003 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Julia ewchuk, Community Development Director DATE: July 31, 1999 SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 99-003 Amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to Provide for Additional Standards and Regulations Governing Land Clearing And Yard Trash Recycling Operations in the Unincorporated Areas of St. Lucie County. Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 99-003 which proposes a series of amendments to the County's Land Development Code addressing the specific use of Land Clearing And Yard Trash Recycling Operations. In general, this ordinance provides for the following: Section 2.00.00 Definitions: This draft ordinance provides for the addition of five (5) new definitions for Construction and Demolition Debris, Land Clearing Debris, Land Clearing Operation, Land Clearing and Yard Trash Recycling Operations and Yard Trash. - Section 3.01.03 Zoning Districts: This draft ordinance provides for clarification as to the requirement that Land Clearing And Yard Trash Recycling Operations are only authorized conditional uses, subject to meeting certain specific standards. Section 7.10.12 Supplemental Standards: Scrap Waste and Recycling Operations This draft ordinance adds a new paragraph "C" to this section, providing specific standards for all Land Clearing and Yard Trash Recycling Operations. These standards will apply to all new operations and to all existing Land Clearing and Yard Trash Recycling Operations as of January 1, 2001. At the May 20, 1999, meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, the Commission reviewed the proposed ordinance and expressed some concern and questions over several sections of these proposed regulations. The first area of concern dealt with the definitions found in Section 2.00.00. These terms were originally taken from regulations affecting waste disposal as found in the Florida Administrative Code. Based on the questions raised at the Planning Commission meeting, we have compared these definitions to the terms used in Chapter 403.703, Florida Statutes, and Rule 62-256, Florida Administrative Code. At the July 20,1999, meeting of the Board of County Commissioners there were some question raised about the adequacy of these definitions and how these regulations may affect other land clearing disposal M July 31, 1999 Page 2 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-003 operation in the community. Specifically, there was a question as to whether or not these operations would affect those business activities that were able to lawfully dispose of land clearing debris on -site through burning or other permitted means. The proposed addition of a definition for the term Land Clearing and Yard Trash Recycling Operation makes it very clear that these rules apply only to those operations that receive land clearing and yard trash materials for recycling purposes. If an individual or company engaged in a land clearing activity is able to obtain the necessary Department of Forestry Burn Permits they may, within the limits of those regulations, dispose of that material on -site without having to truck the materials to a recycling center. Neither the regulations contained in Draft Ordinance 99-003, or any other part of the County's Land Development Code, are intended to permit, or imply permission, for any land clearing contractor operating an on -site burning/disposal operation truck in debris from off -site clearing locations. The only way in which that kind of land clearing and disposal operation could be permitted is if, in addition to meeting all applicable State regulations, the land clearing contractor receives a Conditional Use approval for the operation of a solid waste disposal facility in St. Lucie County. In addition to the two required Conditional Use Public Hearings that this requires, this kind of operation would in most cases require a change in zoning. At the Board's meeting of July 20, 1999, staff indicated that we would be discussing this matter further with the representatives of the land clearing contractors in the community seeking such business abilities. At this time we can report to you that we have met and over the next few months, staff will prepare some draft regulations for consideration by the Board that affect these activities. Since the Boards meeting of July 20, 1999, staff has been provided additional information from the Fire Department that effects the basic design of the storage piles associated with these recycling facilities. Referencing the requirements of NFPA 46, Recommended Safe Practice for Storage of Forest Products, staff has amended paragraph 4 to read as follows: 4. All stockpiles shall be surrounded with a network of fully operating fire hydrants spaced at intervals of no more than 250 feet No Do of the stockpile yard shall be less than 200 feet from any fire hydrant Each fire hydrant shall provide for a minimum fire flow of 750 gallons per minute unless otherwise provided for by the St. Lucie County Fire District. it be necessary for fire fighting purposes This emergencystorage area maynot include any of the required minimum setbacks or separation corridors for the debris storage areas (stockpiles) This emergency storage area shall be adequately served with access to ire %we M July 31, 1999 Page 3 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-003 suppression resources consistent with this code. FIGURE 7-29 LAYOUT OF LAND CLEARING AND YARD WASTE STORAGE PILES -� Storage Pib 10�,-St—ga Pk 17Sto�Pll:-] 1 100 foot dear space and firo lane �rnRl�roO FSto�Pil- soo tee c'""'i Storage Pib Storage Piles Fire lane 1 % *nos the pile height - not less lass than 90 feet Wk1th Storage Pile 100' Storage Pile Storage Pile 250It. (Max.) * 100, Storage Pib Storage Poe Storage Pile The total site area thatmavbe covered with the debris storage areas (stockpiles), excluding the emergency stockpile area shall not exceed 60 % of the gross area of the project site. Underline is for addition is for deletion Double Underline and''Redliie identifies change from 7/12/99 draft Paragraph 13, establishes a requirement that a Security Bond be posted for the removal of any stored material, in the event that the business fails or other conditions arise where the County would be forced to initiate a disposal/restoration action. The bond shall be posted prior to the County sanctioning the operation of any of these facilities. The initial suggested bond amount was $100,000 per site, regardless of size. At the Board's meeting of July 20,1999, a variable bond requirement was discussed. This bond would be assessed in increments, based on the parcel size. Following up on the Boards directions, staff has amended Paragraph 13 to read as follows: 13. Every land clearing and yard trash recycling operation authorized under this section, shall determined by the County Commission following a dulynoticed public hearing, that the land clearing and yard trash recycling operation has been abandoned or recycling operations have ceased fora period in excess of six months or ►f the Conditional Use Permit is revoked for any reason The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to any land clearing and yard trash recycling operation operated by any unit of local govemment within the County. 0 M July 31, 1999 Page 4 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-003 Storage Yard Size Required Security I Underline is for addition is for deletion Double Underline AndlRedline identifies change from 7/12/99 draft On May 20, 1999, the Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on these proposed amendments. At that hearing the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 7-0 to recommend that Draft Ordinance 99-003 be approved. On July 20, 1999 this Board held its second public hearing on the proposed ordinance. Following the acceptance of public comments on this matter, the Board continued any further deliberations on this matter until August 17, 1999. Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 99-003, as amended based on the above discussion. If you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMITTED a .JA�� Juli hewchuk Co unity Development Director JS/djm OR9903m4(diskl 1) cc: County Administrator Asst. County Administrator County Attorney Planning Manager Fire Marshal AS TO FORM Daniel McIntyre County Attorney M E5 I ORDINANCE NO.99-003 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 2.00.00, DEFINITIONS, TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADDITION OF DEFINITIONS OF CONSTO" 6TION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS, LAND CLEANING DEBRIS, LAND CLEARING OPERATION, LAND CLEARihI�a���AND Y ," TRASH RECYCLING OPERATION AND YARD TRASH 'BYAMENOINGS''E0TION 3.01.03(U)(7), INDUSTRIAL HEAVY ZONING DISTRIT TOAJA1D TRASH RECYCLING OPERATIONS AS ON[1TIONAL USE a . AMENDING SECTION 3.01.03(W)(7), UTZONING DISTRI �O 4#"( ADD YARD TRASH RECYCLING OPERAtjo"SOAS A CONDITIONAL USE; BY ADDING SECTION 7.10(C�iA►P AND TRASH MATERIALS, TO PROVIDE FOR THE AD'6ITIONV-0 L:AND CLEARING AND YARD TRASH RECYCLING, OERATIONS BYE PROVIDING RESTRICTIONS, STANDARDS, .DESCo= EQUIREIVIENTS, REPORT FILING REQUIREMENTS ANDv,ENFOReJEM PROCEDURES; BY AMENDING SECTION 11.1,;3.01(A), EI !DEMENT OF CODE PROVISIONS, GENERALLY, TO AD,© LAI=ARING AND YARD TRASH RECYCLING OPERATIONS#1AS A ITEM TO BE ENFORCED BY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL HEARING BdARD; BY PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, BY PROW[ rIG FOR SEVERABILITY, BY PROVIDING FOR4i�PLICABILITY�BYPROVIDING FOR FILING WITH TH. �, EPARTII� O STAT�. PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE near 8Y PE SING FOR ADOPTION AND PROVIDING FOR WHEREASthQ ounto�Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the followiN determin.2 On Augur i$� ',"A'990, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, 01iorida, adopted the St. Lucie County Land Development Code xum. Te ?. Board of County Commissioners has adopted certain << �'rnendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, =rxy� through the following Ordinances -------------------------------- Underline is for addition ---Th—agh is for deletion Double Underline and Redline identifies change from 7/12/99 draft Ordinance #99-003f Page 1 Draft #6 PRINT DATE: 07/31/99 91-03 - March 14, 1991 91-09 - May 14, 1991 91-21 - November 7, 1991 92-17 - June 2, 1992 93-01 - February 16, 1993 93-03 - February 16, 1993 93-05 - May 25, 1993 93-06 - May 25, 1993 93-07 - May 25, 1993 94-07 - June 22, 1994 94-18 - August 16, 1994 94-21 - August 1994 95-01 - January 10, 1995 96-10 - Augu t6' 1996 97-01 - March 4, 1997 97-09 -� October 7, 1997 97-23 - September 2, 1997 99-,01 - F��ruary 2, 1999 99-02 - April 6, 1999 99 cx -t8 2. Recently the County has experienced a nur�Ier of firVth"' clearing and yard trash recycling opera!tons r��the County, ttef which to extinguish has been in excessof�IU0,000. 3. The Board has determined that t e nc [ratted storage of land eneral health clearing materials does create a potential ha ar g and safety of the public. 71 xF 4. On May 20, 1999, the Lo2�l ..... ecy/ Planning and Zoning Commission held a pu tiohearir g onth rdc�sed ordinance after 4 publishing notice in the, ort StLucie Ne', s' did the Tribune at least 10 days prior to the aring and recommended that the proposed ordinance be approved. 5. On July 6 vx this B:Ftits first public hearing on the Dos e, aft e `skiing a notice of such hearing in the St. L and the Tribune on xxxxxxxx xx, 1999. 6. O' 0, 19 oard held its second public hearing on the inan fter publishing a notice of such hearing in the q Port ews and the Tribune on xxxxxxxx xx, 1999, and continu blic hearing until August 17, 1999. 7. On Augs , 17, 1999, this Board reconvened the public hearing and accept_ f additional public comments and testimony. ThAl'roposed amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Q&elopment Code are consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan - is for deletion Double. Underline -.and Redline identifies change from 7/12/99 draft Ordinance #99-003f Page 2 Draft #6 PRINT DATE: 07/31/99 M M 1 2 3 4 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 Ordinance #99-003f Draft #6 and is in the best interest of the health safety and public welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. THE SPECIFIC AMENDMENTS TO THE ST. LAWS TO READ AS FOLLOWS, INCLUDE: CHAPTE COUN " COD ----------- ----------- ---------- Underline is for addition is for deletion Double ''Underlane and Redline identifies change from 7/12/99 draft Page 3 PRINT DATE: 07/31/99 saw, Nome 37 38 nontreated wood scraps from facilities manufacturing materials used for construction of structures or their components and unpainted, nontreated wood pallets provided the wood scraps and pallets are separated from other solid waste where generated and the generator of such wood scraps or pallets implements scraps or pallets with other solid waste; ana management practices of the industry. operation. CHAPTER III ZONING DISTRICTS --------------------- Underline is for addition is for deletion Double -Underline I'll ,Redl ife identifies change from 7/12/99 draft ordinance #99-003f Draft #6 Page 4 PRINT DATE: 07/31/99 `awe E5 1 3.01.00 ZONING DISTRICT USE REGULATIONS 2 3 3.01.03 ZONING DISTRICTS 4 5 U. IH INDUSTRIAL, HEAVY 6 7 7. Conditional Uses 8 3 $5 9 a. Airport, landing and takeoff fields - general aviat� 4581) 10 b. Manufacturing: in 11 (1) Paper & allied products (26) 12 (2) Chemicals & allied products (gs) 13 (3) Petroleum refining & related produ 14 (4) Stone, clay, glass & concrete produ ¢ 15 (5) Primary metal industries (33) � 16 (6) Ammunition & ordinance peas)". 17 C. Natural or manufactured gas storage and ributi > 18 d. Scrap,, alid waste,and land clearing and vard trash re lions frteterials-subject 19 to the provisions of Section 7.1012 20 a Warehousing and storage services) 21 f. Wholesale trade -nondurable g s:'- 22 (1) Petroleum & petroleut�product` �l 23 24.; 5 25 W. U UTILITIES 26 27 7. Conditional Uses 28 29 a A)rpol rtt4 30 b: tnc gen 31 C. roductio 32 iv. ann an It, recycling operations - subject to the rovisions of Section 33 7$1iJi2 s§s . 34 d.e J bufactur as storage and distribution points. c492> 35 e-f "nProte s and their related activities -Correctional institutions c9223> 36z Solid west a c4953> 37 Outdoors 4� cojsssanges, providing site plan approval is obtained according to the 38 provisions ons 11.02.07 through 11.02.09 and Section 7.10.19 of this Code. c> 39 ; 40 := 41 42 s� 3 Q 43 A :. -------------- Underline is for addition is for deletion Double Underline and Redline identifies change from 7/12/99 draft Page Ordinance #99-003f PRINT DATE: 07/31/99 Draft #6 'r/ 10) 4 5 6 CHAPTER VII DEVELOPMENT DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS -------------------------------- Underline is for addition is for deletion Double Underline and Redline identifies change from 7/12/99 draft Ordinance #99-003f Draft #6 Page 6 PRINT DATE: 07/31/99 M M 4. `` gallons per minute, unless otherwise provided for by the St. Lucie County Fire District -------------------------------- Underline is for addition is for deletion Double ;Underline and-Tedline identifies change from 7/12/99 draft Ordinance #99-003f Page 7 Draft #6 PRINT DATE: 07/31/99 1�w *140 be necessary for firefighting purposes This emergency storage area may not include any of the required minimum setbacks or separation corridors for the debris storage areas -------------------------------- Underline is for addition is for deletion Double Underline"an& Redline identifies change from 7/12/99 draft Ordinance #99-003f Page 8 Draft #6 PRINT DATE: 07/31/99 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 g 9 10 11 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 by the County Commission, following a duly noticed public hearing, that the land clearing and yard trash recycling operation has been abandoned or recycling operations have ceased for period in excess of six months, or of the Conditional Use Permit is revoked for any reason. The provisions of this paragraph shall not apply to any land clearing and yard trash recvcliny operation operated by any unit of local government within the County. -------------------------------- Underline is for addition is for deletion Double Underline andiRedline identifies change from 7/12/99 draft ordinance #99-003f Draft #6 Page 9 PRINT DATE: 07/31/99 E5 Enforcement proceedings with respect to the following provisions shall be in accordance with Section 11.13.02: a. Wellfield Protection (Sections 6.03.00 and 11.05.10) b. Wastewater and Sewage Disposal Compliance (Sections 7.08.03 and 11.05.09) C. Wetlands Protection (Section 6.02.03). d. Native Upland Habitat Protection (Section 6.04.01) e. Land clearing and yard trash recycling operations 7. c e ff. Standard Housing Code (Section 13.08.0 g All other codes, statutes, rules, regulati pte hereunder pursuant to Section 11.13.02(L). 2. Enforcement proceedings with respect to all visions is Code, P^ d in paragraph 1 above shall be in accordan a 11.13.03. PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. PART D. 1 This ordine shall be t PARTS. FILING Thdlerk be and is he A�2. #native Code ad �r. PART.'F� EFFEC OF St. Lucie County's jurisdiction. DEPARTMENT OF STATE. directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of is, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. DATE. ---------- --- — Underline is for addition is for deletion Double underline and->Redlirie identifies change from 7/12/99 draft Ordinance #99-003f Page 10 Draft #6 PRINT DATE: 07/31/99 M 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. PART G. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis Vice Chairman John Bruhn Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson PART H. CODIFICATION. '. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporate word "ordinance" may be changed to "section° icle", ordinance may be renumbered or relettered accompti through H shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ENACTED th th day , y, 1 99-003f(LDCamends - disc #12) XXX V'And Compiled Laws, and the word, and the sections of this 3vided, however, that parts B MKOF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY --- Unde—rline——is—— for— — additio-- —— n IS for deletion Double:CTnderline and-R iilinn identifies change from 7/12/99 draft Ordinance #99-003f Page it Draft #6 PRINT DATE: 07/31/99 M PUBLIC HEARING - DRAFT ORDINANCE 99-003 Mr. Dennis Murphy stated that he will be presenting a number of Draft Ordinances that will affect the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Normally these Ordinances would be presented as one document but, based on previous public requests staff will be presenting them separately tonight. Mr. Murphy introduced the first agenda item, Draft Ordinance 99-003. He stated that this Draft Ordinance proposes a series of amendments to the Land Development Code that would regulate Land Clearing and Yard Waste Recycling Operations. Mr. Murphy noted that these regulations had been under development for several months and that they were not being presented as any type of reactionary action as a result of the recent experiences with the mulch fire on Glades Cut -Off Road. This Ordinance establishes specific design and performance criteria for these operations. These criteria would apply not only to private organizations but also to the County as well since the County operates a yard waste recycling out in the landfill. Mr. Murphy referenced the definitions in Section H. The terms included definitions for Land Clearing Debris, Land Clearing Operations, and Yard Trash. He also mentioned that the amendments to Section III clarify the list of uses in the Heavy Industrial and the Utility Zoning Districts. He emphasized that these uses are already allowed in these districts as Conditional Uses. These amendments are for clarification only. In Section 7.10.12 there is a new paragraph, "C". It outlines the basic design and development criteria for the operation and construction of these facilities. He noted that these regulations rely heavily on National Fire Protection Standards and Guidelines. They establish minimum and maximum yard sizes for these operations. It also mandates that there be water supplies available on site. On site means through fire hydrants which have adequate pressure. The last three sections of Part "C" are very important. Paragraph #11 states that a complete site plan must be prepared in accordance with the provisions of Section 11.02.00 of the Land Development Code and this site plan is to be submitted with the application for Conditional Use. Paragraph #12 establishes a security bond requirement in the event the operation went out of business, the County would have sufficient funds available to clean it up. Paragraph #13 makes these regulations applicable to all existing developments and uses. Mr. Murphy noted that to his knowledge, there are three land clearing operations in the County. East Coast, which is the one that everyone is currently aware of, and he believes there is another one on the corner of Glades Cut -Off Road and Range Line. He is not aware of there being any more. Mr. Murphy asked if there were any questions or comments on this Draft Ordinance. Chairman Wesloski asked Mr. Murphy if city water was available to Range Line Road. Planning & Zoning Commission/ May 20, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 43 %r/ M Mr. Murphy stated no. Chairman Wesloski asked Mr. Murphy if there was water out at the landfill. Mr. Murphy stated yes. Chairman Wesloski asked Mr. Murphy if everyone has to pay the security bond except a municipality or County. Mr. Murphy stated yes. The bonding programs are meant to provide the County with some assurances if the business closed and materials were just left. The County was not likely to go out of business or just close up shop without properly closing out the operation. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions from the Board. Mr. Moore asked Mr. Murphy about the letter of credit requirement. He stated that from personal experience with bonding requirements and insurance companies there was some litigation for raising the bonds for a certain type of specialty type of insurance and whether or not they grandfathered the companies in that were paying a lower bond. It wasn't a case of there was no bond and all of a sudden there was a bond, there was actually a lower bond going on a higher bond. The results of that litigation were that you couldn't require higher bonds on the existing operations. This issue is the only thing that concerns him. Chairman Wesloski asked Mr. Murphy if he thought that the requirement for the bond was attainable. Mr. Murphy stated that ultimately that might have to be answered in the Courts, but that he believed that for new operations the bonding requirements were enforceable and that because of the public safety concerns for these operations, the retroactive application of this requirement was also possible. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any more questions. Ms. Dreyer stated that she thought that they needed to look at the definition of "land clearing operation" and simplify it and avoid leaving something out. For instance, she referred to the "uprooting or clearing of vegetation in connection with ... or industrial development." She stated that would include commercial development and that she would suggest "the uprooting or clearing of vegetation in connection with development, construction, or the clearing of vegetation to enhance property value and aesthetics". Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any other questions from the Board. Mr. Matthes asked Mr. Murphy about page 5, paragraph three, second part. He wondered where the number 250 came from. Planning & Zoning Commission/ May 20, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 44 Mr. Murphy stated that it comes from NFPA guidelines and recommendations from the Fire District. At this time, Chairman Wesloski opened the public hearing on Draft Ordinance 99-003. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone who would like to speak on Draft Ordinance 99-003. Mr. Bill Hearn, who resides in Indrio, addressed the Board. Mr. Hearn referred to page two, number two. He mentions how he doesn't understand why they would expand this operation into the Utility Zoning Districts when they are in areas where you would not want to see a cloud of smoke. He also doesn't see how putting the operations in these areas would assist in water accessibility. He would suggest not including it in the Utility Zoning Districts because of the surrounding areas. He also refers to page three, under definitions. He stated that the second line under "land clearing debris" doesn't mention "yard trash" and that he thinks that it should be placed there. Also in the definition "land clearing operation" the word "trash" is used in several places and he thinks that the word "waste" would be a lot better. Chairman Wesloski mentioned that she thought that it was clear that Mr. Murphy was going to look at these terms. Mr. Hearn mentioned the following concerns: • Page 4, under utilities. He expressed that he did not think that this was a good idea, as he mentioned before. • Page 5, number two, fourth line down. He quoted the word "unpierced" and he assumes that they mean solid and that he does not think that unpierced is not a good word to place there. • He mentioned vegetative screening in the next paragraph. He stated that in some areas of the Land Development Code the provision for the maintenance of the vegetation exists and he doesn't know whether this should be addressed here or not. • Page 5, under #3, second paragraph, the mention of fire hydrants. He stated that the word "operating" should be added before "fire hydrants." • Page 5, #5, in reference to the base area. He does not think it is a good idea to use asphalt under a potential fire hazard because any fire that would be touching the asphalt would create a great deal of black smoke. He approves of the concrete or dirt. • Page 5, #6, he wondered who would be responsible for keeping up with the maintenance of the records. Planning & Zoning Commission/ May 20, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 45 144w, en Page 6, #12, "the provisions of this paragraph..." He asked if all these regulations except that applies to the County. He said that if it doesn't, he believes.it should. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone else who would like to speak on Draft Ordinance 99- 003. Mr. Tom Whitley, 1102 Driftwood Lane, Fort Pierce, addressed the Board. Mr. Whitley stated that he is an employee of and representing the Fire District. He urged support of the issue. He also stated that as of today, the Fire District has spent over $100,000 fighting the mulch fire on Glades Cut -Off Road. Any attempts to govern this type of activity is looked favorably upon by the Fire District. The recommendations in this Ordinance are backed up by the NFPA, circular number 46, which is recommended safe practices for these type of operations. He stated that they support this and urge the Commission to pass it. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone else who would like to speak on Draft Ordinance 99- 003. Ms. Patricia Ferrick, 4802 South 25 h Street, Fort Pierce, addressed the Board. Ms. Ferrick stated that she appreciated the efforts that were being made to help this problem. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone else who would like to speak on Draft Ordinance 99- 003. Mr. Edward McKay, 9550 South Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, addressed the Board. Mr. McKay stated that he thought that there is a need to prevent any tire recycling. He understands that there are plans to condense them and make the process easier, but if the tires were ever involved in a fire, the resources to put it out wouldn't be accessible. He suggested adding something in the Land Development Code which would not allow tire recycling. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone else who would like to speak on Draft Ordinance 99- 003. Hearing no further arguments in favor or in opposition to Draft Ordinance 99-003, Chairman Wesloski closed the public portion of the hearing. Chairman Wesloski provided a recap: Page 2, #2 and Page 4, the question about whether it should be in the Utilities Zoning Districts. Page 3, the rewrite of the definitions. Page 5, #2, the meaning of the word "unpierced". Planning & Zoning Commission/ May 20, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 46 En Page 5, #3, specifying that the fire hydrants need to be working ones. Page 5, #5, the question regarding asphalt surfaces. Page 5, #6, the question about who would maintain the paperwork. Mr. Murphy asked to clarify two things. These operations are already allowed as a conditional use in the Utilities Zoning District. The County's Solid Waste Division will be responsible for monitoring these operations. Chairman Wesloski asked if anyone else would like to ask any questions. Ms. Dreyer asked Mr. Murphy if this issue would be applicable County -wide. Mr. Murphy stated that only in the unincorporated area of the County. Ms. Dreyer suggested applying it County -wide since the Fire District is a County service. Ms. Dreyer stated that the Fire District could ask the municipalities if they would like to be included. Ms. Young, the Assistant County Attorney, stated that would be an option if she would like to add that. She believes that Mr. Murphy is correct in saying that neither of the cities have these kind of operations. Chairman Wesloski asked if anyone else would like to ask any questions. Chairman Wesloski asked what was the pleasure of the Board. Mr. Grande stated that he had a procedural question. He asked would a motion as general as recommending approval with the list that Chairman Wesloski has be acceptable to the Chair. Chairman Wesloski stated that it was fine with her. Mr. Trias seconded the motion. Chairman Wesloski asked Mr. Grande whether his was a motion or not. Mr. Grande stated yes, he would make that motion with the addition of the County -wide coverage. Chairman Wesloski asked Mr. Trias if he would second that motion. Planning & Zoning Commission/ May 20, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 47 "*We `400 Mr. Trias stated that he disagreed with that. Mr. Grande stated that he would withdraw the addition of the County -wide coverage. Chairman Wesloski stated that there was a motion made to adopt the Draft Ordinance with the changes that were made. Mr. Trias confirmed his second. Mr. Merritt asked whether this would include the fire hydrants or not. Chairman Wesloski stated that they would stay in the Draft Ordinance. Mr. Matthes asked if it were to include the Utility Zoning District. Chairman Wesloski stated yes. She stated that the County's operation is in a Utility Zoning District. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone who would like to discuss anything else. Upon roll call the motion was approved 7-0. Planning & Zoning Commission/ May 20, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 48 \%w r/ AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1999 7: 00 P.M. Consider Draft Ordinance 99-003, Amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to Provide for Additional Standards and Regulations Governing Land Clearing and Yard Trash Recycling Operations in the Unincorporated Areas of St. Lucie County. If it becomes necessary, these public hearings maybe continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testing during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on July 9,1999. FILE NO. ORD-99-003 NOTICE OF ESTABLISHMENT OR CHANGE OF REGULATION AFFECTING THE USE OF LAND The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners propose to adopt the following Ordinance: ORDINANCE NO.99-003 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 2.00.00, DEFINITIONS, TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADDITION OF DEFINITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS, LAND CLEARING DEBRIS, LAND CLEARING OPERATION AND YARD TRASH; BY AMENDING SECTION 3.01.03(U)(7), INDUSTRIAL HEAVY ZONING DISTRICT TO ADD YARD TRASH RECYCLING OPERATIONS AS A CONDITIONAL USE; BY AMENDING SECTION 3.01.03(W)(7), UTILITIES ZONING DISTRICT TO ADD YARD TRASH RECYCLING OPERATIONS AS A CONDITIONAL USE; BY ADDING SECTION 7.10.12(C) SCRAP AND TRASH MATERIALS, TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADDITION OF LAND CLEARING AND YARD TRASH RECYCLING OPERATIONS• BY PROVIDING RESTRICTIONS, STANDARDS, DESIGN REQUIREMENTS, REPORT FILING REQUIREMENTS AND ENFORCEMENT PROCEDURES; BY AMENDING SECTION 11.13.01(A) ENFORCEMENT OF CODE PROVISIONS, GENERALLY, TO ADD LAND CLEARING AND YARD. TRASH RECYCLING OPERATIONS AS A rrEM TO BE ENFORCED BY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL HEARING BOARD; BY PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, BY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BY PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY, BY PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, BY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, BY PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION. A PUBLIC HEARING on Ordinance 99-003 will be held before the St. - Lucie County Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, July 20, 1990, at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of. the County Administration Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL. Matters affecting your personal and property. rights may be heard and acted upon. All interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be heard. The purpose of this public hearing is to amend the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to provide for regulations governing the establishment and operation of Yard Waste Recycling Operations as a Conditional Use in certain zoning districts of the County. This is the second of two required public hearings. If any person decides to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter considered at the meetings or hearings of any board, committees, commissions, agency, council or advisory group, that person will need record of the proceedings and that, for such purposes may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record should include the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. This notice dated and executed this 8th day of June, 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ Paula A. Lewis, Chairman PUBLISH DATE: July 9, 1999 111 Z Itt,O s NOTICE OF ESTABLISHMENT OR CHANGE OF REGULATION AFFECTING THE USE OF LAND The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners propose to adopt the following Ordinance: ORDINANCE NO.99-003 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 2.00.00, DEF- INITIONS, TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADDITION OF DEFINITIONS OF CONSTRUCTION AND DEMOLITION DEBRIS, LAND CLEARING DEBRIS, LAND CLEARING OPERATION AND YARD TRASH; BY AMENDING SECTION 3.01.03(U)(7), INDUSTRIAL HEAVY ZONING DISTRICT TO ADD YARD TRASH RECYCLING OPERATIONS AS A CONDITIONAL USE; BY AMENDING SEC- TION 3.01.03(W)(7), UTILITIES ZONING DISTRICT TO ADD YARD TRASH RECYCLING OPERATIONS AS A CONDITIONAL USE; BY ADDING SECTION 7.10.12(C) SCRAP AND TRASH MATERIALS, TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADDITION OF LAND CLEARING AND YARD TRASH RECYCLING OPERATIONS BY PROVIDING RESTRICTIONS, STANDARDS, DESIGN REQUIRE- MENTS, REPORT FILING REQUIREMENTS AND ENFORCE- MENT PROCEDURES; BY AMENDING SECTION 11.13.01(A) ENFORCEMENT OF CODE PROVISIONS, GENERALLY, TO ADD LAND CLEARING AND YARD TRASH RECYCLING OPERA- TIONS AS A ITEM TO BE ENFORCED BY ENVIRONMENTAL CONTROL HEARING BOARD; BY PROVIDING FOR CONFLICT- ING PROVISIONS, BY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, BY PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY, BY PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, BY PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, BY PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND PRO- VIDING FOR CODIFICATION. A PUBLIC HEARING on Ordinance 99-003 will be held before the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners_ on Tuesday, July 20, 1999, at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the County Administration Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL. Matters affecting your personal and property rights may be heard and acted upon. All interested per- sons are invited to attend and be heard. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be heard. The purpose of this public hearing is to amend the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to provide for regulations governing the establishment and operation of Yard Waste Recycling Operations as a Conditional Use in certain zoning districts of the County. This is the second of two required public hearings. If any person decides to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter considered at the meetings or hearings of any board, committees, commissions, agency, council or advisory group, that person will _need record of the pro- ceedings and that, for such purposes may need to ensure that a ver- batim record of the proceedings is made, which record should include the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party.to,the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying dur- ing a hearing upon request. This notice dated and executed this 8th day of June, 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ Paula A. Lewis, Chairman PUBLISH DATE: July 9, 1999 T,,1,wLw **toe AGENDA REQUEST *00, ITEM NO. 4K DATE: August 17, 1999 CONSENT ( ] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ X ] Leg. [ X ] Quasi -JD. [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED �""'--BY: 1( SUBMITTED BY: Community Development 1 V� ` CAW Community Dev. Director SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 99-004 amending Section 2.00.00 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to create a new definition for the term Contiguous and to amend the existing definition of Gross Density. BACKGROUND: Draft Ordinance 99-004 proposes to add a new definition to the Land Development Code clarifying what may be considered as Contiguous property for the purpose of determining residential development density. With the addition of this new definition, there is also the necessity to make certain clarifying adjustment to the existing definition Gross Density to make it consistent with the issues of contiguity discussed under the definition of Contiguous. At the May 20, 1999 meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, there was considerable discussion on this proposed amendment. Following the discussion on this item, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-3 to recommend that Draft Ordinance 99- 004 be approved, subject to the certain minor editorial changes. At the July 6, 1999, Board discussion of this item, there was considerable discussion on the definition of Contiguous and how it applied on a countywide basis. In the discussion, it appeared that the overriding concern of the Board dealt with exactly how much final project density could be clustered onto a parcel of land, assuming that all other design and development standards could be met. In follow-up staff discussion, and taking into considerations the direction of the Board, it is recommended the definition of Contiguous be amended to read as follows: Contiguous means abutt4nv touching the sharing -of a common border at more than da ainale point of intersection. Under this definition, two or more parcels would be considered to be contiguous if they touched each other at two or more points. This definition requires that there be two separate intersecting lines from one parcel onto another in order for the entire parcel to be considered as one for development purposes. Since the concerns of the Board appeared to center more on the net density impacts of clustered development density, Staff recommends that the Board consider the following amended language to the definition of Gross Density: Gross Density means the number of dwelling units located on an area of land, divided by the entire area of the development including lots, streets, and other development associated with the dwelling units. In calculating density, only those lands that lie above the elevation of mean high water (MHW) shall be considered. in determining the elevations above or below MHW, man-made changes in the topography, subsequent to the effective date of this Code shall be ignored. If a parcel of land is divided by a public or Orly Aright-of-way or zoning atlas boundary, and if the parcel otherwise meets the definition of a contiguous Parcel as defined in this code, it may, at the owner's discretion, be considered to be one (1) parcel for the purpose of determining gross density 'nrovided ha't any transfer or clusteriiW'of available density onho` z y,9Tit;au of a narce7 of 7a_nd that ,s divided by a o uh7;r+„or orivate-riaht-of-way shall not exceed 300$ of the allowable gross• -density of the =QefiVina development area basgd on-the.narcels ra filtilland Lse claasif�cation. When computing allowable density, fractions greater than or equal to 0.5 shall be rounded to the next higher whole number. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: This is the second of two required public hearings on this Ordinance. The first public hearing on Draft Ordinance 99-004 was held on July 6, 1999. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners direct that Draft Ordinance 99-004 including the definition of contiguity and ross density as amended be readvertised and reconsidered by the Planning and/Z)5ning Commission. COMNHSSION ACTION: [+ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Gross density discussion and of n ' quity County Attorney: vrb Originating Dept: removed from the amended definition was approved. Coordination/Signatures Mgt & Budget: Other: Administrator Purchasing: Other: Finance (copies only): (AGEND469) COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: August 17, 1999 Ordinance 99-004 MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT TO: County Commission FROM: Julia Shewchuk, Community Development Director DATE: July 31, 1999 SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 99-004, Amending Section 2.00.00, Definitions, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to Provide for the Addition of a Definition of the Term Contiguous and to Amend the Definition of Gross Density. Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 99-004 which proposes to add a new definition to the Land Development Code establishing what may be considered as contiguous property for the purpose of determining residential development density. With the addition of this new definition, there is the necessity to make certain clarifying adjustment to the definition Gross Densityto make it consistent with the issues of contiguity discussed under the definition of Contiguous. The original submitted proposed amendments in this Ordinance read as follows: CONTIGUOUS Means a Darcel of land that is separated by a street or road right of way, easement, pipeline Dowerline conduit, rights -of -way under the ownership of the land owner of one of the subject parcels a property owners association governmental agency or public utility. For the purpose of density computations only, contiguous means that the parcels of land separated by any of the methods described above must have at minimum common border of at least fifty (50) feet. DENSITY, GROSS: The number of dwelling units located on an area of land, divided by the entire area of the development including lots, streets, and other development associated with the dwelling units. In calculating density, only those lands that lie above the elevation of mean high water (MHW) shall be considered. In determining the elevations above or below MHW, man-made changes in the topography, subsequent to the effective date of this Code shall be ignored. If a parcel of land is divided by a public right-of-way or zoning atlas boundary, and if the parcel otherwise meets the definition of a contiguous parcel as defined in this code it may, at the owner's discretion, be considered to be one (1) parcel for the purpose of determining gross density. When computing allowable density, fractions greater than or equal to 0.5 shall be rounded to the next higher whole number. Underline is for addition 6trike Through is for deletion MA July 31, 1999 Page 2 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-004 The illustration below highlights how this new definition would be applied. This would be considered to be a contigious site for the purpose of density computations. Illustration of "Contiguous" definition This would be considered This would be considered to be ■ contigious site for to be a condgious site for the purpose of density the purpose of density computations. . computations. . A B f B I C I/ if C _J gfwt Efa .ITbiswould not be Minimum 50' overlap of pe�rwilidd wnsidemd to be a wnligiws property line to qualify for s«awsite for the purpose of density transfer/clustering IIpryerralww• I density computations. B A C D C Common Area or Public Property At the May 20, 1999 meeting of the Planning and Zoning Commission, there was considerable discussion on this proposed amendment. Several members of the Planning and Zoning Commission expressed concern that the proposed amendments were a substantial deviation from previous County practices, particularly in the area of density computation and how the minimum 50 foot overlap requirement was determined. In addition, there were some concerns expressed that this proposal appeared to be directed to one particular development submittal and that in addressing those concerns the County maybe inadvertently creating additional non -conforming development sites. Following the discussion on this item, the Planning and Zoning Commission voted 4-3 to recommended that Draft Ordinance 99-004 be approved, subject to the following minor editorial changes: CONTIGUOUS parcels. a property owners association, governmental agency or public utility. For the purpose of density computations only, contiguous means that the parcels of land separated by any of the methods described above must have at minimum common border of at least fifty (50) feet. cm E5 July 31, 1999 Page 3 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-004 At the July 6, 1999, Board discussion of this item, there was considerable discussion on the definition of Contiguous and how it applied on a countywide basis. In the discussion, it appeared that the overriding concern of the Board dealt with exactly how much final project density could be clustered onto a parcel of land, assuming that all other design and development standards could be met. In follow-up staff discussion, and taking into considerations the direction of the Board, it is recommended the definition of Contiguous be amended to read as follows: Underline is for addition SUikereupM is for deletion Doub16 Undedinft efid Redlid6 Identifies change from 7/12/99 draft This definition is the same definition as found in the Martin County Land Development Code. Under this definition, two or more parcels would be considered to be contiguous if they touched each other at two or more points. This definition requires that there be two separate intersecting lines from one parcel onto another in order for the entire parcel to be considered as one for development purposes. Since the concerns of the Board appeared to centered more on the net density impacts of clustered development density, Staff recommends that the Board consider the following amended language to the definition of Gross Density: Gross Density: The number of dwelling units located on an area of land, divided by the entire area of the development including lots, streets, and other development associated with the dwelling units. In calculating density, only those lands that lie above the elevation of mean high water (MHW) shall be considered. In determining the elevations above or below MHW, man-made changes in the topography, subsequent to the effective date of this Code shall be ignored. If a parcel of land is divided by a public ... ;right-of-way or zoning atlas boundary, and if the parcel otherwise meets the definition of a continuous parcel as defined in this code, it may, at the owner's discretion. be considered to be one (1) parcel for thepurpose_of determininggross density r number. greater than or equal to 0.5 shall be rounded to the next higher whole Underline is for addition 6N+Ne-*h"0h is for deletion Double.Jnderline'anA Aedlite identifies change from 7/12/99 draft An illustration of this definition would be a parcel on Hutchinson Island, that runs from the the Atlantic Ocean to the Indian River. Assume that the parcel to the east of SR A-1-A is three acres in area and has a Future Land Use Designation of nine (9) units to the acre. The parcel to the west of SR A-1-A is 15 acres and has a Future Land Use Density of five (5) units to the acre. All of the site is considered to be above Mean High Water. For the purpose of this example the site is assumed to meet the definition of "contiguous" lands. *%W IM July 31, 1999 Page 4 Subject: Draft Ordinance 99-004 Under this example, the parcel to the east of SR A-1-A would have a maximum development density of 27 units. The parcel to the west has a maximum development density of 75 units . Under the County's current land development regulations, assuming that you were able to meet all other minimum county design standards, including compliance with the county's building spacing formula, you would be allowed to cluster as many of the units from the west side of SR A-1-A to the east side of SR A-1-A that you could fit. With the proposed additional language to the definition of "Gross Density", the total number of units that may be "clustered" from the west side to the east side would be 54 units, making it a total of 81 on the parcel east of SR A-1-A. The remaining 21 units from the west side would have to stay on the west side. Again this example assumes that it is physically possible to fit all 81 units on the east side of SR A-1-A. Nothing under the County's current Land Development Code regulations, or under this proposed amendment, would serve to relieve any property owner from complying with the County's minimum design standards and regulations. This is the second of two required public hearings on this Ordinance. The first public hearing on Draft Ordinance 99-004 was held on July 6, 1999. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners direct that Draft Ordinance 99-004 including the definition of contiguity and gross density as amended be readvertised and reconsidered by the Planning and Zoning Commission. If you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMITTED - APPROVED AS TO FORM Julia Shewchuk Daniel clntyre Community Development Director County Attorney JSldim OR9904m3(diskl 1) cc: County Administrator Asst. County Administrator County Attorney Planning Manager E5 ORDINANCE NO.99-004 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 2.00.00 DEFIN TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADDITION OF A DEFINITIONT' CONTIGUOUS AND TO AMEND THE DEFINITI OF.,- „ , E BY PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROV , BY SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR APPLI ILITYADIN FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF TE, P EFFECTIVE DATE, PROVIDING FOR ADM NZD PROVID CODIFICATION. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners the following determination: 1. On August 1, 1990, the B County, Florida, adoptec Code. 2. The Board of Cod� IDty � �& amendments to t. through the follang Ord -03h 14, 19 1 �' ber 7, %1, 6, 1993 WX Augu'§R F, 1994 J5=01anua 0, 1995 97-01 = h 4, 1997 97-23 - 5 ember 2, 1997 99-02-pril6, 1999 TERM NSITY; G FOR OR , Florida, has made ,s of St. Lucie Development ,nissiogo'ts has adopted certain Court Land Development Code, 91-09 - May 14, 1991 92-17 - June 2, 1992 93-03 - February 16, 1993 93-06 - May 25, 1993 94-07 - June 22, 1994 94-21 - August 16, 1994 96-10 - August 6, 1996 97-09 - October 7, 1997 99-01 - February 2, 1999 99-xx - Date 3. On Mayo, 1999, the Local Planning Agency/ Planning and Zoning Co a sion held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance after ub hing notice in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune at least v days prior to the hearing and recommended that the proposed ordinance be approved. -- ------------ Underline is for addition is for deletion Double Underline and:Redline identifies change from 6/04/99 draft Ordinance #99-004c Page 1 Draft #2 PRINT DATE: 07/31/99 1 2 3 4 5 7 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 4. On July 6, 1999 this Board held its first. public hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune on June 24, 1999. 5. On August 17, 1999 this Board held its second public hearingon the proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice of such heard " "in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune on xxxxxx xx„ 1� :: u 6. The proposed amendments to th t. Lucie Land Development Code are consistent wi, he geng,al pui" Is, objectives and standards of the St Lug County4Cmprehe and is in the best interest of the health safe end public welfa 3 citizens of St. Lucie County, Florida. s NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board ofCouraty Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida:" PART A. THE SPECIFIC AMENDMENTS HE S LUCIE BOUNTY CODE AND COMPILED LAWS TO READ AS FOLLOWS; CLUDS: 2.00.00 When CF )E R II IONS terms shall have the meanings herein ascribed to them. ----------- --------------------- Underline is for addition is for deletion le�Underline-and"Redline identifies change from 6/04/99 draft Ordinance #99-004c Page 2 Draft #2 PRINT DATE: 07/31/99 RM M DENSITY, GROSS: The number of dwelling units located on an area of land, divided by the development including lots, streets, and other development associate ith th calculating density, only those lands that lie above the elevation of k be considered. In determining the elevations above or w M topography, subsequent to the effective date of this C all be i divided by a public or Drivate:right-of-way or zoning "'Af s bounda be considered to be auowaDie oensny, tracuons greater man or number. *************** PART B. CONFLICTING PROVIStt 'WE Special acts of the Florida leg islatwr"`�'apI County, County ordinances anO,,1,36) nty ordinance are hereby supers9IJ by thi PART for the 01bose of to e area of the welling units. In er (MHW) shall changes in the ,arcel of land is, next higher whole le only t7o incorporated areas of St. Lucie gx lutions,,4­1 parts thereof, in conflict with this inan .eo the extent of such conflict. If any portio rdinari ny reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or holdir Y_ not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordi Vision f�iereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, propertyor circumsf E holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, proper#y, or circumsta�tce ..a... D. APPUOb►BILITY OF ORDINANCE. I be applicable throughout St. Lucie County's jurisdiction. -------------- Underline is for addition is for deletion Double Underline and Redline identifies change from 6/04/99 draft Ordinance #99-004c Page 3 Draft #2 PRINP DATE: 07/31/99 PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk be and is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART F. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with PART G. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordin Chairman Paula A. Lewis Vice Chairman John Bru Commissioner Cliff Commissioner Commission F.i'annie PART H. Provisions of„ flrs orb Compiled ws, ancf tI approword, and accoMDlish such inten ED AND DU XXX XXX shy&llbe incorporated in the St. Lucie County Code and "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other Irons of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to vided, however, that parts B through H shall not be codified. D this xxth day of xxxxx, 1999 -- ------------ Underline is for addition is for deletion Double Underline rid a`Redline identifies change from 6/04/99 draft Ordinance #99-004c Page 4 Draft #2 PRINT DATE: 07/31/99 im BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHA1, AAN vO APPR'ED AST , Ed G(JRREC,AAIESS: EY -------------------------------- Underline is for addition is for deletion Do Eil , U' Aderfifie and=Red11 a identifies change from 6/04/99 draft Ordinance #99-004c Page 5 Draft #2 PRINT DATE: 07/31/99 EJ PUBLIC HEARING - DRAFT ORDINANCE 99-004 Mr. Murphy introduced Draft Ordinance 99-004, which proposes to add a new definition to the Land Development Code. The new definition of contiguous would clarify what may be considered as contiguous property for the purpose of determining residential development density. With this new definition, it was also necessary to make certain clarifying adjustments to the definition "Gross Density" to make it consistent with the issues of contiguity discussed under the definition of "Contiguous". He summarized the proposed new definition by stating that where a parcel of land is split by a street or canal, so long as there is a 50 foot or more overlap of the property you may count the property on both sides of the boundary for the purpose of the density computation. Mr. Murphy asked if there were any questions. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions from the Board. Mr. Matthes asked Mr. Murphy where the 50 feet came from and what was the logic behind this number. Mr. Murphy stated that he believes the rationale was based on a Martin County regulation. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any questions from the Board. Mr. Merritt stated that he had a question concerning the 50 feet. Mr. Merritt asked Mr. Murphy if properties that were caddy -cornered, would they be considered contiguous for density clustering purposes. Mr. Murphy stated that, as drafted, unless there was the 50 foot overlap, they would not be considered contiguous. Mr. Merritt stated that he did not see the logic with this. Mr. Merritt asked Mr. Murphy what was the minimum width required for access to a property. Mr. Murphy stated that the minimum road frontage for a residential single-family parcel is 30 feet. Mr. Merritt stated that he is not talking about general access. He stated he is referring to beach front properties where some properties that may be caddy -cornered from each other. You may not be able to build on the property but you should be able to transfer the density from one part of your property to another part of your property. Planning & Zoning Commission/ May 20, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 49 Mr. Murphy stated that the Board can elect to recommend whatever number that they wanted. If you want a number lower than 50 feet, you may recommend one. Draft Ordinance 99-004 includes the number that was provided to staff. Mr. Trias asked Mr. Murphy to give him an example as to why this is important. Mr. Murphy referenced the beach property discussed earlier. Two years ago developers came in with two pieces of property that were split by AIA. They were contiguous by the County's determination, based on the County's position that a point to point contact made them one piece for density clustering purposes. Mr. Trias asked Mr. Murphy if you have two parcels that are defined separately then you can use the density of one parcel for the density of the other parcel. Mr. Murphy stated yes, but the parcels have to be connected in some manner to each other. Mr. Grande referred to Mr. Trias' discussion. He thinks that there may be a misunderstanding. If there are two parcels across the road that one would think of them as two separate parcels having two different densities. He believes that once the parcels are considered contiguous, you can use the more dense parcel for both, because it is a single parcel. Mr. Murphy stated that is not quite correct. It is a single parcel for the purpose of density computation. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any other questions. Ms. Dreyer asked if there was any other place in the Land Development Code that does this, is there _ a need to put in a caveat under the density provisions that you can only use the parcel once for the computation of density. She thinks the idea is obvious, but it is not written in the Land Development Code. Mr. Murphy acknowledged that, that specific statement is not in the Code. It is assumed to be obvious. Mr. Trias said basically they are dealing with a transfer of development rights situation. Chairman Wesloski asked if there were any other questions. At this time, Chairman Wesloski opened the public hearing on Draft Ordinance 99-004. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone who would like to speak on Draft Ordinance 99-004. Mr. Bill Hearn, who resides in Indrio, addressed the Board. Mr. Hearn referred to the cover page and the definition of contiguous. It states that it uses the word "means" to start out with and he Planning & Zoning Commission/ May 20, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 50 thinks that they should start with the word "includes". On the second line, "under the ownership of the land owner". He does not feel that "of' should be included. On page two, he would suggest the same with the definition of contiguous. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone else who would like to speak on Draft Ordinance 99- 004. Mr. Harvey Newman, property owner in the County, and partner in Wynne Building Corporation, which owns property on Hutchinson Island, addressed the Board. Mr. Newman refers to precedent. There are numerous precedents in the County whereby property was developed under the interpretation of contiguous property as currently understood. If you follow these precedents, you are assuming that the precedent will be the same. He has a letter that was written which concerns that parcel that was referenced earlier. The letter was written to him, prior to purchasing the property. He stated that they did this so that when they bought this property, they would know that it was suitable for their use. They met with the Land Development Coordinator and he wrote in the letter "as long as the above two properties are physically contiguous at at least one point, the unit density from each parcel may be clustered onto one of them. In other words, in this instance, since the two properties do touch, even at a corner, you can cluster the unit density from both onto one, provided you can meet all other County standards..." He stated that by considering this amendment, they are affecting the rights of property owners. He has another letter which outlines "what to do". He doesn't know why this is a big issue and they have to change. He stated that they may be creating some consequences which may be jeopardizing both you and the County. Mr. Grande stated that he understands that much of the beach was developed on an ocean to river basis. He thinks the contiguity portion of the law is designed to allow the owners to treat the two as a single piece of property and allow the people to use the one side as full development. He asked if Mr. Newman's presentation was that if a developer could not get both sides, but chooses to buy the next piece in one direction or another (referring to the display on the overhead made by Mr. Kelly), he is asking for that to be contiguous. Mr. Newman stated that he is relying on the County's definition. That property could be a condominium on the beach. There could be condos that were developed using that theory. Mr. Grande stated that he does not believe that is the topic of discussion. Mr. Newman stated that he is trying to say that he believes that if they do some checking, they will find that that is not the case in the development; it has already been employed out on the beach on some other properties. Mr. Newman stated that a generalization is not appropriate. He stated that his point is being done to prevent a specific development, its not a policy that affects the whole County. There is not a need Planning & Zoning Commission/ May 20, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 51 i✓ `„ o for it. He asked why they must focus on this. Mr. Grande stated that he doesn't believe there is a place on the island where this has been done previously. He said that he would have given Mr. Newman's testimony more credibility if he had specifically named where it was done previously. Mr. Newman suggested asking this question to the County instead of towards him. Mr. Grande stated that he thinks this Draft Ordinance is made of this type, the County has come forward with this definition to answer the questions concerning it. He stated that Mr. Newman's testimony is, "we don't need this because there are no questions," that is not accurate because of the fact that it is being discussed expresses that there are questions. Mr. Newman stated that when you start putting footage in the definition, you are creating problems. He has no problem with the one point. Mr. Grande refers to Palm Beach County. The touching of one point is not legal there. Mr. Murphy references back to Martin and Palm Beach Counties definitions that were part of the original request to amend this section of the Code. In Palm Beach, lots with the point to point are not considered contiguous. This information is contained in the file for Draft Ordinance 99-004. Mr. Newman stated that point to point is what was used for years in the County. Mr. Grande stated that he did not know of any instances when point to point was accepted as contiguous before Mr. Newman's case. Mr. Newman stated that he would have to ask Mr. Murphy. His goal is to say that 50 feet is changing their rights. Mr. Grande stated that he believes that this Draft Ordinance does not take any of his rights of the past. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Newman if there was some distance, other that point to point, that would make this more acceptable to him. Mr. Newman stated that he didn't understand the question. What is acceptable to him is what was written in the letter to him from the County. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone else who would like to speak on Draft Ordinance 99- 004. Mr. Ed McKay, 9550 South Ocean Drive, Jensen Beach, addressed the Board. Mr. McKay stated that the point to point has been proven wrong in three Courts. He stated that they (Mr. Newman) Planning & Zoning Commission/ May 20, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 52 %me M could probably file lawsuits for the misinformation that was given to them by staff. Chairman Wesloski asked Mr. McKay to stay on the issue. Mr. McKay stated that if there are any properties that are done point to point, they are that way because they were never taken to Court. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was anyone else who would like to speak on Draft Ordinance 99- 004. Hearing no further arguments in favor or in opposition to Draft Ordinance 99-004, Chairman Wesloski closed the public portion of the hearing. Mr. Trias stated that he is unclear about the transferring of densities from one parcel to another. He believes that there has to be some legal process because he does not believe that this can be done informally. Mr. Murphy stated that the position of the County, prior to this Draft Ordinance, was if there is a parcel of land under common ownership and it was divided by a road or waterway it was considered to be contiguous for the purpose of density computation so long as at least one point of the separated parcels were in contact with each other. Mr. Trias asked Mr. Murphy if this was only for density purposes. Mr. Murphy stated yes. Mr. Trias asked Mr. Murphy if you have to replat the parcels for a site plan. Mr. Murphy stated that platting would only be required if you met the general plat requirements. Mr. Matthes asked if one gets a Unity Title to parcels that are offset at a contiguous point to point, is that one parcel for the purpose of density computation? Chairman Wesloski asked Ms. Young to answer. Ms. Young stated that she is not really sure. It is possible but she can not give a definitive answer on this night. Mr. Grande stated that he had the overriding sense that one of the speakers stated that he would want it so the County would never be allowed to make a change or correction to its regulations. He stated that if they were to take the logic of the last witness, they would never be allowed to make a change. He believes that all that the Draft Ordinance is saying is that anything unclear in the past is now going to be clarified. Planning & Zoning Commission/ May 20, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 53 NW Mr. Grande stated that he does not believe that point to point was used but at most one case in the past. Chairman Wesloski asked Mr. Murphy if there have been more than one problem with the point to point interpretation. Mr. Murphy stated that "up to the case that no one wants to talk about, it hadn't been an issue." Mr. Trias asked Mr. Murphy if this transfer of development happens anywhere other than on the beach. For example, could it happen on U.S. 1. Mr. Murphy stated that it could. Chairman Wesloski asked Mr. Murphy if generally speaking, it has worked. Mr. Murphy stated yes. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Murphy if there has been point to point cases in the past. Mr. Murphy stated that there has been at least one. Mr. Grande asked Mr. Murphy if the County was challenged legally. Mr. Murphy stated no. Mr. Grande asked if the point to point situation was reviewed legally and then shot down. Mr. Murphy stated that the contiguity question came up in a legal matter that the County was involved in. There was a judicial determination made, and for a number of reasons, the site plan approval orders that were approved by the County for a project on the beach were effectively voided. Ms. Dreyer asked Mr. Murphy if this was the only definition of contiguous in the Land Development Code. Mr. Murphy stated yes. Ms. Dreyer stated that she is sure that there are general planning concepts that define the word contiguous, but as she reads the definition, it only applies to two parcels that are separated by the enumerated pipelines, roads, etc., and it does not discuss the two parcels that don't have easements or rights of ways separating them that may be point to point and she suggests maybe mentioning that. Mr. Moore stated that aside from the County trying to comply with a Court mandate, he is trying to get clear as to how the 50 feet is an improvement over the point to point. He asked what is the Planning & Zoning Commission/ May 20, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 54 0 *"W benefit. Mr. Grande referenced Mr. Moore's comment. He believes that one of the rationales behind this is that if the parcels were truly contiguous, you would be able to go directly across the right-of-way without having to go in front of another property. He believes that the 50 feet requirement is good and that you should be able to connect parcels in order to consider them contiguous. He thinks this comes up more on the beach, and it is important to get there and there should be an overlap that would get you from one to the other. Mr. Merritt stated that he believes that the land would be contiguous no matter the number of feet. He stated that he doesn't understand the argument. It seems to him that if it touches, it would be contiguous. Chairman Wesloski asked Mr. Merritt if he would like to make a motion on that. Mr. Merritt made a motion to deny Draft Ordinance 99-004. Mr. Matthes seconded the motion. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was any discussion. Mr. Grande stated that he would not be able to support the motion on the basis of if there were no intervening right-of-way, the parcels that would qualify under the motion would not be considered a single parcel. Upon roll call the motion of Mr. Merritt was denied 4-3, with Mr. Merritt, Mr. Matthes, and Chairman Wesloski voting to approve and Mr. Moore, Mr. Trias, Ms. Dreyer, and Mr. Grande voting to deny. Mr. Grande stated that having voted down the motion, he would hereby motion to approve Draft Ordinance 99-004. Ms. Dreyer seconded the motion if it would include the language changes of Mr. Hearn and direction of staff to look at the definition as to whether it accomplishes all that they believe it to. Mr. Grande agreed. Chairman Wesloski asked if there was any discussion. Upon roll call, Draft Ordinance 99-004 was approved 4-3, with Mr. Moore, Mr. Trias, Ms. Dreyer, and Mr. Grande voting to approve and Mr. Merritt, Mr. Matthes, and Chairman Wesloski voting to deny. Planning & Zoning Commission/ May 20, 1999 Local Planning Agency Page 55 AGENDA - BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TUESDAY, AUGUST 17, 1999 7: 00 P.M. Consider Draft Ordinance 99-004 amending Section ZOO.00 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to create a new definition for the term Contiguous and to amend the existing definition of Gross Density. If it becomes necessary, these public hearings may be continued from time to time. Please note that all proceedings before the Board of County Commissioners are electronically recorded. If a person decides to appeal any decision made by the Board of County Commissioners with respect to any matter considered at such meeting or hearing, he will need a record of the proceedings, and that, for such purposes, he may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record includes the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testing during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be considered. Legal notice was published in the Port St. Lucie News and The Tribune, newspapers of general circulation in St. Lucie County, on August S, 1999. FILE NO. ORD-99-004 %we 14.d NOTICE OFESTABLISHMENT . OR CHANGE OF REGULATION AFFECTING THE USE OF LAND The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners propose to adopt thefollowing Ordinance: ORDINANCE NO.99-004 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 2.00.00, DEFINITIONS, TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADDITION OF A DEFINITION OF THE TERM CONTIGUOUS AND TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF GROSS DENSITY, BY PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISION, BY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY, PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION. A PUBLIC HEARING on Ordinance 99-004 will be held before the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, August 17, 1999, at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, in .the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the County Administration Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL. Matters affecting your personal and property rights may be heard and acted upon. All interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Written comments received! in advance of the public hearing will also be heard. The purpose of this public hearing is to amend the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to provide for the addition of a definition of the term contiguousand to amend the definition of gross density. This is the second of two required. public hearings.. . If any person decides to appeal any decision made with respect to any matter considered at the meetings or hearings of any board,,comnilttees, commissions, agency, council or advisory group, that person will need record of the proceedings and that, for such purposes may need 'to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record should include the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any patty to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. This notice dated and executed this 2nd day of August,,1999... BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST, LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA t /S/ Paula A. Lewis, Chairman PUBLISH DATE: August S, 1999 -1/1 e 14"1 5 NOTICE OF ESTABLISHMENT OR CHANGE OF REGULATION AFFECTING THE USE OF LAND The St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners propose to adopt the following Ordinance: ORDINANCE NO. 99-004 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 2.00.00, DEFINITIONS, TO PROVIDE FOR THE ADDITION OF A DEFI- NITION OF THE TERM CONTIGUOUS AND TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF GROSS DENSITY; BY PROVIDING FOR CON- FLICTING PROVISION, BY PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY, PROVIDING FOR FILING. WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE, PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE, PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND PRO- VIDING FOR CODIFICATION. A PUBLIC HEARING on Ordinance 99-004 will be held before the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners on Tuesday, August 17, 1999, at 6:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible, in the County Commission Chambers, 3rd floor of the County Administration Annex, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Ft. Pierce, FL. Matters affecting your personal and property rights may be heard and acted upon. All interested persons are invited to attend and be heard. Written comments received in advance of the public hearing will also be heard. The purpose of this public hearing is to amend the St. Lucie County Land Development Code to provide for the addition of a definition of the term contiguousand to amend the definition of gross density. This is the sec- ond of two required public hearings. If any person decides to appeal any decision made with respect to any matterconsidered at the meetings or hearings of any board, committees, commissions, agency, council or advisory group, that person will need I ecord of the proceedings and that, for such purposes may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made, which record should include the testimony and evidence upon which the appeal is to be based. Upon the request of any party to the proceeding, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceeding will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. This notice dated and executed this 2nd day of August, 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA /S/ Paula A. Lewis, Chairman PUBLISH DATE: August 5, 1999 ,4J) w1tZ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO.L DATE: August 17, 1999 REGULAR[ ] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT[] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: South Florida Recycling, Inc. Capital Projects Finance Authority Bond Issue BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Resolution No. 99-210 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Resolution. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [ VT APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: - ou as Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 LL.P. MEMORANDUM To: Board of County Commissioners St. Lucie County, Florida i From: Robert O. Fre;.man pt, Date: August 10, 1999 Re: South Florida Recycling, Inc. Project — Capitol Projects Finance Authority Dond Iss)ac South Florida Recycling, Inc. has requested that the Board enter into an laterloeal Agrcenient with the Capital Projects Finance Authority, a special purpose authority created by Ordinance of the City of I4loore Haven, florida, for the purpose of issuing bonds to finance capital projects worldwide. The purpose of the Interlocal Agreement would be to allow the Capital Projects Finance Authority ("CAPFA") to exercise powers under Chapter 1-59, Part 11, Flo6da Statutes, and issue bonds, a portion of the proceeds of which would be loan to South Florida Recycling in order to finance or refinance its facilities located in St. Lucie Courity. In connection with this particLdar band FSSUe, South Florida Recycling, Inc.. has represented that proceeds of the Bonds will be loaned to it to finance or refinance Similar facilities located in Broward, Palm Beach, Orange, and Lee Counties. South FloridaRecycling has further represented that the Bonds will be special, limited obligations of CAPFA, the proceeds of which will be payable Solely from arnouuts clue under a loan agrceulent betWeell CAPFA and South Florida Recycling, Inc. We have reviewed and revised the attached Resolution and Interlocal A.creement and believe that these documents furnish a reasonable degree of assurance to the County that it will inctur no liability as a result of the issuance of the proposed bonds by CAPFA and the loaning of the proceeds thereof to South Florida Recycling, Inc., in connection with the project in St. Lucie County and the other counties. The Interlocal Agrcemcnt includes appropriate indemnifications, and we have requested the addition of certain assurances in the form of certificates and opinions to be furnished to the County at the time of issuance and delivery of the bonds and loaning of the monies to South Florida Recycling, Inc. Bill Leedy has undertaken a limited investigation into the creditworthiness of South Florida Recycling, Inc,, and its parent, Waste Corporation of America! Inc., and will bey furnishing a separate report to the Board in connection with this request. Due to limited i 30V3 '❑1 1Qoefri 0b' 11 66-1 ]fi;; ,%w/ En availability of financial information, however, Bill's final report will not be available at this time. We have added to the lnterlocal Agreement the receipt of his report as a condition to the sale of the Bonds by CAPFA. I plan to be present at the Board meeting on August 171", and would be pleased to arts er any questions that the Board may have about this request and the documentation associatcd thereµztn. cc• Daniel, S. Niclntyre, County Attorney Douglas K Anderson, County administrator Loomis C. Lccdy; III, Willia.^.1 R. Hough & Company, Financial Advisor 2 17? is LV(8: 12-CVOWCAPFA-N%-BCC V 3:?t!? `aI 'Wotl3 tb'tt 66-t(.-Dnd w.►' rn RESOLUTION N0.99-210 A UESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF S I.UCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA, APPROVING AN INTER -LOCAL : %GR]: ETMENT %XITH THE CAPITAL PROJECTS FINANCE AUTHORITY; PROVIDING FOR THE LOA_Nr 'G Or NIONEYS BY SAID AUTHORITY TO % ASTE C OIZPORATION OF FLORIDA, INC. (THE "BORRO X FR") FOR FIN ANClNG OR REFIN.,NCING THE. ACQUISITION, CONSTRUCTION, REND VA110N AND 1?QUIPPING OF SOLID WASTE FACILITIES LOCATED TN ST. I.uciE COUNTY: F1,0RIDA; PROVIDDtiG AN EFFECTIVE DATE. BF IT RESOLVED B7 FHE BOARD OF CQIi NTY CO.viMISSVIN;✓R` i ST. LT C O -TNTY, FLORIDA: ARTICLE I AUTHORITY, DEFINITIONS AND FINDINGS SECTION 1. -\UT .1ORITY FOR THIS RESOLUTION, This Resolution is adopt%u a ursuaw to the laws of the Stat: of Florida, including, in particular Chapter 1 A25, Fart M of"r'i=.aptcr 159 -and part II, Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, and other applicable provislcros of 1::1w th,. .Act,"t. SECTION 2. FINDINGS. The Board hereby finds, detcrmi.nes altd decizres as follo% s. South Florida Recycling, Inc. , the Borrower "} has ren tested tha the Count - consent to the issuance of bonds by the Capital Projects Finance Authority (th.c "Authority") to finance or refilami::e the acquisition, cotustntction. and equipping of a 5obd eva=te rectici:n, iN-11icr to ,ated in the County (the "Pro ect"). B. The Burrower has requested that the County ia) approve the i.s}i,w7ic.- or bo:.ds N•% the Authority in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 147(f) of the 111tenzi :l Re,, �_-oLte. Cc,de of 1986, as a;nended, and (b) approve the form of; and authorize the execution �i�a lelit'c rti v±. t+, - Interloca.t Agreement b,.tween the County and the Authority, �i proposed form of which is zttache,i here -to as Exhibit `'B", pursuant to which the County authorizes the Authority to loan a ltc: rtion :..` tho proceeds of the Bonds to the Borrower for the Project. C. Nokl- of a public hearing to be held on the gate hereof, irviting conmlilents and discussions conceiving issuance of t1he Bonds by the Authority to, fii;ever itnprG%enleni tr to th=; Borrower Facilities was published in The Tribune, a newspaper of general circulation in the Cc>uu,,, at least fourteen. (14) days prior to the date hereof, as shown in the affidavit of publication attached hereto as Exhibit "A". D. The Board is elected legislative body of St. Lucie County, and St. Lucie County, for purposes of Section 147(f) of the Internal Revenue code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"i, has jurisdiction over the Borrower Facilities. an-Vd ; a I ' Woa i i b° t t as- t i- -_flee 114W ,, E. The Authority has represented to the County that the Bonds and the interest thereon shall not constitute an indebtedness or pledge of the general credit or taxing power of the County, but shall be payable solely from the revenues pledged therefor pursuant to a loan agreement or other financing agreement entered into by and between the Authority and the Borrower prior to or contempormneously with the issuance of the Bonds. SECTION 3. APPROVALS. The form of the hiterlocal Agreement attached hereto as Exhibit "B" is hereby approved, subject to such amendments, modifications, additions and deletions thereto as shall be approved by the County Administrator; such approval to be executing: comclw1-vclyevidenced by execution thereof.. The Chair or Vice Chair of the Hoard and the County Administrator and Ex-Officio Clerk of the County or any Deputy Clerk are hereby authorized to execute and deliver the Interl.ocal Agreement. For the purposes of Section 147(f) of the Code, the Beard hereby approves the issuance of the bonds by the Authority in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding $20,000,000. The authorization and approval given herein shall not be construed as 0) an endorsement of creditworthiness of the Borrower or the financial viability of the Project or the bonds, (ii) a recommendation to any prospective purchaser to purchase the Bonds, (iii) an evaluation of the likelihood of the repayment of the debt service on the bonds, or (iv) approval of any necessary rezoning applications or approval or acquiescence to the alteration of existing zoning or land use nor approval for any other regulatory pern-dts relating to the Project, and the Board shall not be construed by reason of its adoption of this Resolution to make any such endorsement, finding or recommendation or to have waived any right of the Board or estopping the Board from asserting any rights it may have in such regard. Further, the authorization and approval by the Board of the issuance of the Bonds by the Authority shall not be construed to obligate the County in. any mariner, in connection with either the issuance of the Bonds or the Project. SECTION 4. EFFECTIVE DATE. This Resolution shall take effect immediately upon its passage. PASSED AND ADOPTED this _` day of August, 1999. (SEAL.) ST. LUCTF. COUNTY, FLORIDA A'17EST: By: Clerk of the Circuit Court; ex officio Clerk to the Board of Countv Commissioners Chairnlan, Board of County Commissioners 2 a:��I�2R90Z-c,{hh»rr,.�prM1-R•��PPR7'r ,n;-rn ,�rti+T a 30aa , a r : 14ON-4 Tv : t t 6S- t t - 0f1H NTERLOCAL AGREEMENT THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT, dated as of August _, 1999 (the "Interlocal Agreement"), is made by and between the CAPITAL PROJECTS FINANCE AUTHORITY (the "Authority"), a public body corporate and politic duly created and existing under the laws and Constitution of the State of Florida, and St. Lucie County, Florida, (the "County"), a political subdivision of the State of Florida - RECITALS Pursuant to the Florida Tnterlocal Cooperation Act of 1969, Section 163.01. Part I, Chapter 163. Florida Statutes, as amended the "Interlocal Cooperation Act")_ "public agencies," as defined iri the Interlocal Cooperation Act, are authorized to enter into agreements with one another in order to make the most cfrcicnt use of their powers by enabling them to cooperate with other localities on a basis of mutual advantage and thereby to provide service; and lacilitics in a manner and pursuant to forms of governmental organization that will accord best with geographic, economic, population and other factors influencing the needs and dtn,elupment of local communities. The Interlocal Cooperation Act provides that a public agency may, pursuant to contract, exercise jointly with any other public agency any power, privilege or authority which such public agencies share in common which each might exercise separately. Pursuant to the Florida Industrial Development Financing Act, fart II, Chapter 159, norida Statutes, as amended (the "Industrial Revenue Bond .Act"), the Authority and the County are authorized to issue revenue bonds and loan the proceeds to qualified borrowers to, among other things. pay all or any part of the "costs of any project" (as defined in the Ind_strial Rtn,ClttiC BVidd ACt)• The Authority and the County arc "public agencies'' and desire, in order to assist in the development and maintenance of the public health, to accomplish economies of scale and other cost savings, to enter into this Interlocal Agreement to authorize the Autlioritc to issue revenue bonds (the "Bonds") and Joan a portion of the proceeds to Waste Corporation of America. Inc.; a corporation and✓'or South Florida Recycling, Inc- a I'lorida Corporation (collectively, the "Interlocal Borrowers'), fbr the purposes of providing funds to, al-riong other things: (i) pay or reimburse the Interlocal Borrowers .for the payment of, or to refinance certain prior debt the proceeds of which were used to pay, costs of acquiring, constructing. renovating, rehabilitating and equipping a certain solid waste facility which is located within the, geographical boundaries of the County, as more particularly described on Exhibit A hereto (the "Project''); (ii) fund a debt service reserve fund for the benefit of the Bonds, if deemed necessary or desirable by the Interlocal Borrowers; and (iii) pay certain expenses incurred in connection ,vith the issuance of the Bonds, including, without limitation, the cos: of any credit enhancernetrt or liquidity enhancement if deemed necessary or desirable by the Interlocal Borrowers. In consideration of the mutual agreements contained in this Interlocal Agreement and upon the further consideration of the recitals in this Interlocal Agreement set forth above, it is agreed by and between the Authority and the County as follows: G 310Vd `aI wodi Zy it ss-ii-onv SW 11"W SECTION 1. DEFINITIONS. Unless the context otherwise requires, the following terms for all purposes of this Interlocal Agreement shall have the following meanings. "Act" means the Industrial Revenue Bond Act and the Interlocal Cooperation Act. "Administrator" means the administrator appointed pursuant to Section 4(d). "Authority" means Capital Projects Finance Authority, and its successors and assigns, as Issuer of the Bonds. "Bored Indenture" means the Bond Trust Indenture between the A.utho: ity and the Bond Trustee pursuant to which the Bonds are to be issued, and all related amendments &nd supp4Men.ts thereto. "Bonds" means the revenue bonds issued in one or more series by the Authority-, for the benefit of the Interlocal Borrowers under the Bond Indenture. "Bond Trustee" means the bond trustee selected by the Interlocal Borrowers under the Bond Indenture. "County" means St. Lucie County, Florida and its successors and assigns. "Interlocal Agreement" means this Interlocal Agreement and all related amendments and supplements. "Loan" mcatks the loan to be made by the Authority to the Interlocal Borrowers to, among other things: (i) pay or reimburse the Interlocal Borrowers for the costs of the Project "Loazt Agreement" means the Loan Agreement between the Authority and, amens others. the Interlocal Horrowers, setting ;forth terms of the Loan. "Project" means the acquisition, construction, renovation, rehabilitation, and equipping of a certain solid waste facility located in the County as more particularly described on Exhibit "A" hereto. "Resolution" means a resolution of the governing body of a party to this Interlocal Agreement adopted for the purpose of approving and authorizing the execution of this Interlocal Agreement or any amendment to this Interlocal Agreement, or approving any action taken pursuant to this Interlocal Agreement when such approval is required. Terms defined in this Section in a singular shall include the pllrral and vice v-ersa- SECTION 2. PURPOSES. In order to assist in the development and maintenance of the public health and to accomplish economies of scale and other cost savings, the Interlocal Borrowers shall be permitted to borrow Bond proceeds from die Authority pursuant to the authority granted in the Acts among other things, to: (i) pay or reimburse the Interlocal Borro•.ti-ers for costs of the Project; (ii) fund a debt service reserve fund for the benefit of the 3'85, V28902-0kM UC {f-FA- IN r t,1J,0CAL .4 rMT a 30`da ° a 1 W0ad E: b^ L L Be- I t- � Ilv '%'0# `0 Bonds, if deemed necessary or desirable by the Interlocal Borrowers; and (iii) pay certain expenses incurred in connection with the issuance of the Bonds, including, without limitation, the cost of an_v credit enhancement or liquidity enhancement if deemed necessary or desirable. by the Interlocal Horra'Vers. SECTION 3. EFFECTIVE DATE; CLOSNG CONDITIONS; DURATION. This Interlocal Agreement shall become effective and shall be enforceable, within, the meaning of the Interlocal Cooperation Act, upon rrccipi by the Administrator of. (i) the Resolutions dul Y adopted by the governing body of the Authority and of the County, respectively, approving and authorizing the execution and delivery of this Interlocal Agreement; (ir) a counterpart of this IIIteI'ic,cal Agreement, duly executed by authorized officers of the Authority and the Cotuity; and (iii) evidence satisfactory to the Administrator of the filing of a duly executed counterpart of this Interlocal Agreement with the Clerk of the Circuit Court of St. Lucie County, Florida. The issuance of the Bolds ::0all he subject to the receipt by the Adinirlis:tratur of. (i) t,lic ducurrients quid showings listed in clauses (i) through (iii) above; (ii) an opinion of counsel to the County regarding the enforceability of the Interlocal Agreement and the due adoption of the County's resolution (iii) an opinion of counsel to the Authority regarding, the enforceability of Intcrlocitl Agreement and the flue adoption of the Authority's Resolution; (iv) such other documents, opinions and showings as are enumerated in writing by the Administrator prior to the issuance of the Bolds and the making of the Loan; and (v) such other documents, opinions and showings as are enumerated by the County prior to the making of the Loan. The term of this Tmerlocal Agrea ent shall end i.ipon the discharge of the Bond Indenture in accordance with the provisions o* the Load Indenture (other than a discharge resulting from reiiuiding the Bond Upon the expiration of this Interlocal Agreement, any property or moneys not required to be used to pay principal, prcmium. if any, or interest on the Bonds and not otherwise required to be applied as required by the Bond Indenture shall, to the extent permitted by law, be distributed pro rats bet,, een the Interlocal Borrowers and the other parties to whom the Loans were made front proceeds of the Bonds. SECTION 4. THE IN ERLOCAL FINANCING. The Authority may sell and issue fi-le Bonds subject to the following conditions. (a) The Bonds. 6) The Authority may authorize the issuance and delivery cf the Bonds pursuant to and subject to the terms and conditions of the Bond Indenture, the portion of which shall be attributable to the Loan being in an aggregate principal amount not to exceed $20,000,000. The Bonds shall be rated and shall bear interest, be subject to repurchase and redemption, be designated and be in the form, and have such other terms as are provided in the Bond Indenture, as finally executed and delivered by the Authority without further approval of the County, but subject in all respects to the provisions set forth in the Authority resolution. If the Bonds are issued, the Authority shall be the sole issuer of the Bonds and the Bonds shall state in express terms that the County is not an issuer or obligor of the Bonds and shall have no liability to any person clai.ming under the Bonds or the Bond Indenture. The County shall not be responsible for any 'ns, I :x oz• �wwllCAIIA INTLM OCALAUX!* 6 3 0 V d ' Cl I : W0dA bb' I I BE- F I- 0rIV err'' , 010 undertaking in connection with the Bonds except as may be expressly set forth in this Interlocal Agreement and the Authority shall indemnify and hold harmless the County- from anv suit, liability, cost or expense incurred by County in connection with the issuance of the Bonds and the making of - the Loan. (i.i) The Bonds, together with interest on the Bonds, shall not constitute a debt, liability or obligation of the County, the State of Florida, or any political subdivision or agency of either, but shall be special and limited obligations of the Authority payable from. and shall be secured solely by.. to the extent and in the manner provided in the Bond Indenture, a pledge to the Bond Trustee of the rights of the Authority under the Note and the Loan. Agreement and the amounts in the funds and accounts created by the Bone Indenture. The County and its members, officers. agents and employees shall not be liable for the payment of the principal of, premium, if any, or interest on the Bonds, nor shall the County or its members, officers, agents and employees, be liable for any other indebtedness or liability which may arise in connection with the issuance of the Bonds or the making of the Loan. (iii j The portion of the proceeds of the sale of the Bonds attributable to the Project shall be applied in accordance with the provisions in Section 2 hereof and the Authority shall furnish to the County at the time of the issuance of the Bonds (i) a certificate of the Administrator setting forth in detail the payment. amounts itemized as to pavice and purpusr for paylrlrllt of the portion of the proceeds of the Bonds allocable to the Project, (ii) an opinion of counsel to the Authority to the effect that all requirements of applicable state law, federal income tax law, acid federal securities laws have been complied with in connection with the issuance of the Bonds and the making of the Loan and (iii) such other certificates and opinions as the County may reasonably request in order to evidence satisfaction of the terms and conditions of this agreement. (iv) The Bonds may be issued in one or more series and, if issLtei in more than one series, references in this Interlocal Agreement to the Bond Indenture. - the Loan Agreement and the Note shall be deemed to include, if necessary. any supplemental Bond Indentures or Loan Agreemexrts and any additional Notes executed and delivered in connection vkith the issuance of the Bonds. (v) The Interlocal Borrowers shall agree to pay any amounts owing on the Bonds pursuant to the provisions of Section 148(+ } of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (vi) The Interlocal Borrowers shall pay any out-of-pocket costs, including the cost of publication of the TETRA notice and the fees and expenses of the bond counsel and financial advisor to the County, in connection with its 4 :72`vI,'2690240001'CAPrA.INTRFI,QC.11. AOMT 01 30VCJ 1 Cl I ' WO8-4 bb ° I t GG - t t ^rl Savo vr% review. approval and execution of the Interlocal Agreement prior to the execution of the Agreement by dhce County. (vii) The Interlocal Rorrowers shall agree in the Loan Agreement to protect, indemnify and save the Authority and the County, their members, officers, agents and employees against and from any and all liabilities, suits, actions, claims, demands, damages, losses, expenses and costs of every kind and nature incurred by or asserted or imposed against the Authority or the County, their members, officers, agents and employees which may arise in connection with the issuance of the Bonds or the making of the Loan. (viii) No offering or sale of the Bonds shall be conducted unless and until the County's Financial Advisor shall have submitted a favorable report to the County with respect to the Interlocal Borrowers current financial condition.. (b) The Loan. (i) Pursuant to and subject to the terms and conditions of the Bond Indenture, the Authority is au.thori7.ed to rrtakc available to the Interlocal Borrowers proceeds of the Bonds to be used by the Interlocal Borrowers fOT the purposes sct forth in Section 2 only after not less than ten (10) days prior notice to the County and with the express written approval of the Comity. (ii) The Loan Agreement shall provide for payments sufficient to pay expenses incident to the issuance of the Bonds and any costs and expenses of the County and its counsel. (c) Special Condition. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the bond documents shall include a covenant by the Interlocal Borrowers that they vx-U not compete with the County's Solid Waste Department in a manner which in the opinion of the County would adversely affect the County's solid waste stream and its solid waste .revenues. The bond documents shall provide further that a breach of this covenant shall result in a default by the Interlocal Borrowers. (d) Administrator. Pursuant to Section 163.01(6) of the Interlocal Cooperation Act, the Authority is designated the Administrator. The Administrates shall have: and is delegated full power and authority to do all things necessary or convcnicnt to carry out the purposes of this Interlocal Agreement, including, without limitation, the appointment of such agents or entities as 5 9785 1 is90s.,wool i;nPF:�-(NTL•21.i:1Cn1. AGM7 t► aOVA :QI woai.i Sv'tt 66-it-onw M M are necessary or desirable to effectuate the issuance of the Bonds and the making of the Loan. SECTION 5. AMENDMENTS_ This Interloeal Agreement tray not be amended. c. inged` modified or altered except by an instrument in writing which shall be: (i) approved by a Resol-,ltion of the governing body of the Authority and of the County; (ii) executed by duly - authorized officers of the Authority and the County; and (iii) filed with the Clerk of thL Circuit Court of St. [,uric County, Florida. SEC710N 6. SEVERABILITY. If any term or provision of tivs Interlocal Agreement or the application to this laterlocal Agreement shall to any extent be invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Interlocal Agreement, or the application of such term or provision to circumstances ocher than those with respect to which it is invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected thereby, and shall be enforced to the extent permitted by law. SECTION 7. GOVERNING 1,AW. All questions with respect to the construction of this Interlocal Agreement, and the rights and liabilities of the parties to this Interlocal Agreement, shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. SECTION 8. NOTICES. Any notice or other communication shall be sufficiently given and shall be deemed given when delivered or mailed by registered or certified mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: If to the Authority -- Capital Projects Finance Authority c/o Office of the City Clerk 99 Riverside Drive Moore Haven, Florida 33471 Attention: City Clerk Telephone: (941) 946-0711 Telecopy: (941) 946-2988 If to the County: St. Lucie County, Florida 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida. 34982 Attention: County Administrator Telephone: (561) 462-1450 Telecopy: (561) 462-1440 In each case witch a copy to the Administrator: 6 3'&I AGMT Z, t 3 wa ° Q 1 = F[oaa 9 b= 1 1 s8- 1 1- onv rrr0 ,410 The Authority and The County may, by notice given hereunder, designate any further or different addressees to which subsequent notices or communications shall be sent. SECTION 9. COI NTERPARTS. This Interlocal Agreement may be executed in any number of cotnterparts, each of which shall be an oriuial, but all of which together shall constitute one and the salve instrument. SECTION 10. NO DELEGATION OF AUTHORITY. This Interlocal Agreement shall in no vvay be interpreted to authorize the unlawful delegation of the constitutional or statutory duties of the Authority, the County or any of their officers, members, representatives or employees. SECTION 11. LIMITED APPROVAL. The approval given in this Interlocal .'agreement shall not be construed as an approval of any necessary zoning or rezoning applications nor for any planning or regulatory permits and the approval of this Interlocal Agreement shall not be construed to be a N aiver by either the Authority or the County of; and neither the Authority nor the County shall be estopped from asserting, any regulatory rights or responsibilities it may have with respect thereto. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Capital Projects Finance Authority and St. Lucie County, Fiorida have caused this Interlocal Agreement to be executed and attested in their respective corporate names by their duly authorized officers all as of the date first above Lvritten. CAPITAL PROJECTS FINANCE AUTHORIT'r' By, 'title: Printed Name: [SEAL] Attest: Title: PrintedName- 7 J785v1;:Y90:-0M1-CnPF WN?FA OCAL ACMT £ I 3DVA `Q I ' W06A 9V 1 1 66- I I -Drro ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: Chairman. Board of County Commissioners [SEAL] Attest: Deputy Clerk Approved by County Attorney as to form and legal sufficiency - Assistant County Attorney STATE OF FLORIDA COT_"VTY OF ST. LUCIE Signed and affirmed before me this day of _ , 1999 in the City of Fore Pierce, St. Lucie County, Florida, by the above individuals who are personally l nox n to me. 8 Notary Public ?BSv�:Ik90:-{ Nlli CAPF'4-iN'ltlU OC�L, M AU tr i 30Vd ' Q I ' Woa-i 9b' i t 66-- i i- 2m7 � V EXHIBIT A PROJECT DESCRIPTION f tmert description from TEFRA Notice] 9 3?3S�,1.2390'"r..iX)f!1!C'•.�PP.0.-;NTBRLOCAL!.Gr✓ i 91 30VC1 :QI :wo�AA Lb'II 60--II-J(ltal 08/13/99 STS*-,UCIE COUNTY - BOARD ,40 FZABWARR , WARRANT LIST #45- 07-AUG-1999 TO 13-AUG-1999 FUND SUMMARY FUND TITLE EXPENSES 001 General Fund 001116 Sec 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning 98/99 001120 Community Services Block Grnt 98/99 001122 CDBG--World of Plastics 001126 Section 112/MPO/FHWA Planning 99/00 001235 TDC Planning Grant 98/99 001236 TDC Non -Sponsored Trip Grant 98/99 001241 Ft. Pierce Inlet Boat Launch Area 001242 98/99 E. M.. P.A. 101 Transportation Trust Fund 101001 Transportation Trust Interlocals 101003 Transportation Trust/Local Option 101006 Transportation Trust/Impact Fees 102 Unincorporated Services Fund 102001 Drainage Maintenance MSTU 105 Library Special Grants Fund 107 Fine & Forfeiture Fund 140 Port & Airport Fund 160 Plan Maintenance RAD Fund 170 Court Facilities Fund 182 Environmental Land Acquisition Fund 183 Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir 183001 Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat 183002 Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat 183004 Ct Admin , Teen Court 183206 FDJJ-Teen Court 98/99 185203 FHFA-SHIP 98/99 186 Recycling Operating Fund 186202 DEP-Recycling & Education 98/99 282 Environmental Land I&S Fund 304 Communication System Fund 310002 Impact Fees -Parks 315 County Building Fund 315201 DOS-315-Fort Pierce Branch Library 316 County Capital 352 SHI Wastewater Treatment Proj Fund 382 Environmental Land Capital Fund 401 Sanitary Landfill Fund 418 Golf Course Fund 421 H.E.W. Utilities Fund 441 North Hutchinson Island Utilities 451 S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund 461 Sports Complex Fund 491 Building Code Fund 501 Automated Services Fund 505 Health Insurance Fund 505001 Property/Casualty Insurance Fund 510 Service Garage Fund 255,484.74 261.49 9,056.86 16,482.15 349.36 83.57 2,508.00 8,767.00 111.87 38,887.27 2,000.00 1,602.50 16,887.84 23,371.84 1,689.03 1,388.49 152,512.68 8,332.40 1,056.20 137.90 145.29 2,034.97 1,051.46 150.00 343.98 69.34 1,226.27 4,095.94 5,402.32 880.00 1,219.30 12,389.40 1,400.00 298.13 42,463.63 33,200.00 69,700.00 8,612.86 6,896.24 134.72 51,729.39 8,258.44 10,583.43 3,613.73 39,491.76 111,913.03 1,028.40 24,911.23 PAGE PAYROLL 257,903.93 0.00 437.50 0.00 3,615.88 62.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 85,306.73 0.00 0.00 0.00 34,945.56 2,917.14 1,758.88 55,173.07 7,343.70 2,348.47 0.00 0.00 4,576.59 1,716.80 0.00 2,036.06 0.00 0.00 1,334.69 444.89 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 24,071.58 14,884.23 171.37 2,855.94 2,684.57 9,875.89 15,499.72 57,728.38 7,335.29 0.00 8,836.03 08/13/99 ST.-ttCIE COUNTY - BOARD r/ FZABWARR WARRANT LIST #45- 07-AUG-1999 TO 13-AUG-1999 FUND SUMMARY FUND TITLE EXPENSES 611 Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund 1,392.28 625 Law Library 28,610.97 GRAND TOTAL: 1,014,217.70 PAGE 2 PAYROLL 2,697.31 0.00 608,562.84 08/13/99 ST**ArUCIE COUNTY - BOARD -fto PAGE FZABWARR VOID LIST# 45- 07-AUG-1999 TO 13-AUG-1999 FUND: 501 Automated Services Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00244844 99027013 The World Golf Village Resort 315.00 FUND TOTAL: 315.00 0 E5 AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ITEM NO. C-2 DATE: _ August 17 1999 REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: (X ) PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS - ADMIN J� Ra zn Publi Work D" ector SUBJECT: Authorization of Appraisal, Title Work, Environmental Phase I and Boundary Survey, of Louis Corcetti Properties on Lennard Road. BACKGROUND: Louis Corcetti owns 3 parcels which lie in the path of future Lennard Road construction. Mr. Corcetti has asked that the County purchase his land. Estimated cost $27,000. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: Funds will be made available in 101006-4116-599330-4169 (Transportation Trust Impact Feels) Project budget of $9,000 established for Lennard Road Extension 7-20-99 for Robin Stone's Property. Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Appraisal, Title Work, Environmental Phase I, and Boundary Survey of Louis Corcetti's Property. O APPROVED O DENIED O OTHER: 4-1 D g s Anderson Comity Administrator Review and Approvals x ® County Attorney: ® Management and Budget: ❑ Purchasing: )�? Oil ❑ Originating Dept: (Pub. Wks.) ❑ Other: (Landfill) ® Other: Acguisition;747 11 Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: k I ,%W Ifto C- '-Z PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT SOLID WASTE DIVISION MEMORANDUM ........ . . . . . . . . . TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Ray Wazny, Public Works Directoro DATE: August 17,1999 RE: Authorization of Appraisal, Title Work, Environmental Phase I and Boundary Survey, of Louis Corceftils Properties, Lennard Road. BACKGROUND: Louis Corcetti owns 3 parcels which fie in the path of future Lennard Road construction. Mr. Corcetti has asked that the County purchase his land. Estimated cost $27,000. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Appraisal, Title Work, Environmental Phase 1, and Boundary Survey of Louis Corcettils Properties. RLW/sm llll�lll ll q' I I, i i� Cl - - - - - - - - - - ------'tr-------I --- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - �--rr.Y� I � - • --J � � I I -T----r------ `'t° ITEM NO. 17 DATE: August-*, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: 0: - AIRM - - IMM SUBJECT: Authorization for additional Y2K funding and Kronos Agreement approval BACKGROUND: On April 27, 1999 the Board approved $169,600 for hardware and software necessary to bring the Banner system and the Kronos time clock system into Y2K compliance. Since then additional items have been identified. The Libraries and Emergency Operations Center need PC and Server hardware upgrades as described in the attached memorandum. After meeting with Kronos to implement the Y2K upgrades approved in the original request it was discovered that additional problems existed. The new proposal and scope of work identify all of work necessary to bring the Kronos time clock system into Y2K compliance and provide a system that will serve the county for years into the future. FUNDS AVAIL.: 001-9910-599330-800 General Fund -Contingency & Reserve -Project Reserve PREVIOUS ACTION: Establish Y2K Reserve $250,000 April 27, 1999 approve $169,600 for items identified RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the transfer of funds and acquisition of equipment and services as requested and authorize the chairman to sign the Kronos Agreement. �Ti�iT►� T �'�+� C�7 ► I_« � C�7 ---• • - County Attorney#) TA% Automated Services:(X);=�y'`f U Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable)_XX_ Coordination/S anature��s Mgt. & Budget:(X) II' Other: / Z0___1 'Al'i ___ o g Oderson County Administrator Purchasing Mgr.:(X) C Z Other: Eff. 1 /97 H:\WP\AGENDAS\OTHER\Y2K funding.wpd MEMORANDUM PURCHASING DEPARTMENT TO: Marie Gouin, OMB FROM: Charles L. Bicht, Sr., Purchasing Manager C,-P' DATE: July 30, 1999 SUBJECT: Y2K Funds As we spoke earlier the funding currently approved will not be adequate to cover the necessary Y2K problems. The funding that was approved by the BOCC was adequate for the problems known at that time. Since that approval additional needs have been identified. All are necessary for Y2K compliance. At the time the original $160,000 was approved I was told there was additional available. Attached are the breakdowns for the Library and EOC. Additional funding requested: Library $15,450.00 EOC 8,208.00 Kronos 39,442.00 Total $63,100.00 H:\WP\MEMOS\Y2K funding.wpd Charles 8icht Y2K U rade EOC _...�„ ....� . P9�, (._ ..._..� �.._, "Page, From: William Martin To: Charles Bicht Date: Fri, Jul 30, 1999 10:45 AM Subject: Y2K Upgrade (EOC) Charlie, I had a nice meeting with Jack Southard last week and I would like to follow up on my idea. Jack informed me he was going to allocate some funds for PC upgrades. I would like to combine the upgrades for EOC by using the combination of Y2K funds and EOC funds allocated by Jack. He has informed me he can appropriate approximately $8000. We have a combination of Y2K issues and OLD equipment that is Y2k, but very slow and not up to our standards. For this reason I propose the following. Y2K EOC Mother Board 350Mhz CPU AGP Video 64 Meg Ram 288.00 288.00 16 19 4608.00 5472.00 4.3 Gig HD 125.00 125.00 14 18 1750.00 2250.00 NT Server 350 MHZ CPU 256 Meg Ram 2- 4Gig HD 1- Gig HD 1850.00 8208.00 7722.00 This will complete all upgrades to EOC and bring them up to current standards throughout the whole department. Bill CC: Dennis WETZEL, George Harbin, Jack Southard Charles Bicht 7Y2KUpGrade� rt_ Page 1 From: William Martin To: Charles Bicht Date: Fri, Jul 30, 1999 10:48 AM Subject: Y21K UpGrade Charlie, Per our conversation a few weeks ago, here are the numbers for the Library system upgrade. Staff PC upgrades, there are a total of 54 PC's that need to be upgraded. 19 - Came from a budget request approval from last year. 3 - Came from Banner upgrade funds 32 - Will need to come from Y21K funds set aside. PC Upgrades 1 - 200Mhz CPU Chip 55.00 1 - 64 Meg Ram 95.00 1 - 3.6 Gig Hard Drive 120.00 270.00 x32 8640.00 Server Upgrades LibHq 2 - 4 Gig Hard Drives 630.00 2 - 9 Gig Hard Drives 780.00 1410.00 Libhur 3 - 4 Gig Hard Drives 945.00 1 - Mother Board 135.00 1 - Chip 200 MHZ 50.00 2 - 125 Meg SDRam 100 MHZ 220.00 1350.00 Liblwp 3 - 4 Gig Hard Drives 945.00 1 - Mother Board 135.00 1 - Chip 200 MHZ 50.00 2 - 125 Meg SDRam 100 MHZ 220.00 1350.00 Libms 3 - 4 Gig Hard Drives 945.00 1 - Mother Board 135.00 1 - Chip 200 MHZ 50.00 2 - 125 Meg SDRam 100 MHZ 220.00 1350.00 [.-,,Charles Bicht - Y2K UpGradev Page..2 M 0 Libpsl 3 - 4 Gig Hard Drives 945.00 1 - Mother Board 135.00 1 - Chip 200 MHZ 50.00 2 - 125 Meg SDRam 100 MHZ 220.00 1350.00 15,450.00 This will bring the library up to Windows 95 compatibility. As you are aware with the grand opening for the new Library we are under the microscope again.... Bill Martin Automated Services CC: Dennis WETZEL, Ed Werner, George Harbin *ftr+rNVANUS July 30, 1999 Charlie Bicht Director of Purchasing St. Lucie County 2700 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Dear Charlie: T. z � �i>Ir z.<-�a caiTeYr Kronos Systems Incorporated 555 Winderly Place Suite 120 Maitland, Florida 32751 (407) 667-0101 Facsimile (407) 667-0141 It was a pleasure meeting all of you on Wednesday. I felt this was a much needed meeting. I am hopeful we are now all on the same page as to the solution St. Lucie County will be installing. The success of this implementation will be based on both parties expectations. There are a few items I just want to clarify: • The price provided for Clocks, Modem Option Kits and Daughter Boards is Depot Exchange. • Kronos will trade in the 154 clocks and the smart converter, which are in unopened boxes. • Trade in credit was given for previous purchase of DOS version. • Department Manager or Basic Operations Training was requested for 10 people, thus this is the price provided. • SCT Banner Interface is in Beta at a number of sites. Thus the interface specifications are subject to change. • Statement of Work is to specify the services, training, and other implementation -related items ("Services") which Kronos and St. Lucie County have estimated and agreed are required by St. Lucie County for their Kronos products. The scope of the project, technical configuration, and roles and responsibilities of Kronos and St. Lucie County are defined in this Statement of Work and form the basis of the estimate of the services required. The estimates in this Statement of Work have been made based on St. Lucie County's fulfilling its obligations as defined herein. If St. Lucie County wishes to purchase services other than those described in this Statement of Work, St. Lucie County may purchase such services at the then applicable Kronos rate. Travel and expenses will be billed separately. Please sign the sales agreement and Statement of Work so we can proceed with this project. If you have any additional questions, please do not hesitate to contact me at 407- 659-3817. 0 Sincerely, A"a' Lori Martin Sr. Systems Sales Representative Government/Education Division ,4 1x"IN KRONOS INCORPORATED 400 FIFTH AVE., WALTHAM MA 02154 Kronos Incorvorated 555 Winderlace. Suite 120 Maitland,FL 32751 4071667-0101 FAX:4071667-0141 Sales Agreement ISSUE DATE 7/13/19999 RED. SHIP DATE Q# O# CUSTOMER NO. CUSTOMER P.O. NO. REGION 434 REP I.D. NO. 1 434631 IMSTALLER 1 JS.A # F.O.B. SHIPPING POINT TERMS BALANCE DUE NET UPON RECEIPT OF INVOICE TAXABLE SHIP VIA YES NO X TAX I.D. NO. REG: X OTHER: INVOICE TO: SHIP TO: COMPANY NAME St. Lucie County COMPANY NAME SAME ADDRESS 2300 Virginia Avenue ADDRESS CITY Fort Pierce STATE FL ZIP CODE 34982 CITY STATE FL ZIP CODE TELEPHONE NO. (561) 462-1700 FAX NO. (561) 462-1704 COUNTY TELEPHONE NO. CONTACT TITLE Charlie Bicht Systems Implementation ATTENTION TITLE ITEM PART NUMBER QTY ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION MAINTENANCE UNIT PRICE MAINTENANCE TOTAL A 8601400-002 1 Workforce Central-500 Ise $ 15,390.00 $ 15,390.00 $ 2,707.50 $ 2,707.50 B 8601075-001 1 User Accounts Up to 25 $ 8,100.00 $ 8,100.00 $ 1,425.00 $ 1,425.00 C 9999521-003 1 Time Bank Base Charge-SCT Banner $ 1,460.00 $ 1,460.00 $ - D 9999521-004 10 Time Bank Employee Pack(50EE) $ 65.00 $ 650.00 $ - E 9999521-009 1 Additional Link Base Charge $ 405.00 $ 405.00 $ - F 9999521-010 10 Additional Link Employee Pack $ 50.00 $ 500.00 $ - G 9999521-015 1 Maintenance for TB Base Charge $ - $ 342.00 $ 342.00 H 9999521-016 10 Maintenance for TB EE pack $ - $ 15.20 $ 152.00 1 9999521-021 1 Maintenance for Additional Link Base Charge $ - =$ 100.00 $ 100.00 J 9999521-022 10 Maintenance for Additional Link EE Pack $ 12.50 $ 125.00 K D 8600615-011 15 480 Full Bar Code 256K $ 1,980.00 $ 29,700.00 $ 150.00 $ 2,250.00 L 8600670-003 15 Battery Back Up $ 160.00 $ 2,400.00 $ - M D 8600947-001 11 Ethernet Daughter Board Kit $ 285.00 $ 3,135.00 $ 35.00 $ 385.00 N D 8600821-001 4 Modem Option Kit $ 205.00 $ 820.00 $ 35.00 $ 140.00 O 1 18601021-006 1 TKC V8D 1,500 ee 5 User $ (5,390.00) $ (5,390.00) $ - P 1 18601031-006 1 Cardsaver V8D 1,500 5 User $ (1,111.00) $ (1,111.00) $ - Q I 19990002-PRO 1 Professional Services $ 28,500.00 $ 28,500.00 $ - * SUPPLIER C- CORPORATE B-BRANCH V-VENDOR # MAINTENANCE B-BASIC C-CENTRAL SITE D-DEPOT SALES SUB -TOTAL $ 84,559.00 MAINTENANCE suBTOTAL $ 7,626.50 TAX $ _ TAX $ _ SUB -TOTAL $ 84,559.00 SUB -TOTAL $ 7,626.50 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS '?OTAL ORDER" does not include shipping charges. TOTAL ORDER $ See Page 2 D=Depot Exchange, 154 clocks to be returned for credit Based upon GSA pricing CHECK NUMBER $ THE ABOVE ORDER IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS STATED ON THE REVERSE SIDE WHICH THE CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGES HAVE BEEN READ. DEPOSIT CHECKS ARE NON-REFUNDABLE. ORDER SUBJECT TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ See Page 2 TO APPLICABLE TAX AND FREIGHT CHARGES. PRICES VALID FOR 30 DAYS KRONOSINCORPORATED APPROVED BY: CUSTOMER St. Lucie County COMPANY NAME AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE TO BE SIGNED BY KRONOS CORPORATE BY: HEADQUARTERS ONLY AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE/TITLE/DATE , kv �,,4 K N3 .� KRONOS INCORPORATED 400 FIFTH AVE., WALTHAM MA 02154 Kronos Incorporated 555 Winderley Vie. Suite 120 Maitland,FL 32751 4071667-0101 FAX:4071667-0141 Sales Agreement ISSUE DATE 7/13/19999 REO. SNIP DATE Q# O# CUSTOMER NO. CUSTOMER P.O. NO. REGION 434 REP I.D. NO. 434631 INSTALLER IS.A # ROA SHIPPING POINT TERMS BALANCE DUE NET UPON RECEIPT OF INVOICE TAXABLE ISHIPVIA YES NO X TAX I.D. NO. REG: X OTHER: INVOICE TO: SHIP TO: COMPANY NAME St. Lucie County COMPANY NAME SAME ADDRESS 2300 Virginia Avenue ADDRESS CRY Fort Pierce STATE FL ZIP CODE 34982 CITY STATE FL ZIPCOOE TELEPHONE NO. (561) 462-1700 FAX NO. (561) 462-1704 COUNTY TELEPHONE NO. CONTACT TRLE Charlie Bicht Systems Implementation ATTENTION TRLE ITEM PART NUMBER QTY ITEM DESCRIPTION UNIT PRICE EXTENSION MAINTENANCE UNIT PRICE MAINTENANCE TOTAL R 9991113-0 10 Department Manger for Workforce CIS $ 400.00 $ 4,000.00 $ - S 9991109-0 2 Administrator for Workforce CIS $ 400.00 $ 800.00 $ - T 9991432-0 2 Data Collection Manager $ 450.00 $ 900.00 $ - U 8601002-011 4 Return of 154 Clocks $ (785.00) $ (3,140.00) $ - V 8600737-001 1 Return of Smart Convertor $ (410.00) $ (410.00) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - ' SUPPLIER C- CORPORATE B-BRANCH V-VENDOR # MAINTENANCE B-BASIC C-CENTRAL SITE D-DEPOT SAS SUB -TOTAL MAW ENANCE $ 2,150.00 sueroTAL $ - TAX $ _ TAX $ SUBTOTAL E 2,150.00 SUB -TOTAL $ - sKcm INsTRUOnONS 'TOTAL ORDER" does not include shipping charges. TOTAL ORDER $ 94,335.50 Based upon GSA pricing CHECK NUMBER $ THE ABOVE ORDER IS SUBJECT TO THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS STATED ON THE REVERSE SIDE WHICH THE CUSTOMER ACKNOWLEDGES HAVE BEEN READ. DEPOSIT CHECKS ARE NON-REFUNDABLE. ORDER SUBJECT TOTAL AMOUNT DUE $ 94,335.50 TO APPLICABLE TAX AND FREIGHT CHARGES. PRICES VALID FOR 30 DAYS' KRONOSINCORPORATED APPROVED BY: AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE TO BE SIGNED BY KRONOS CORPORATE HEADQUARTERS ONLY BY: CUSTOMER St. Lucie County COMPANY NAME AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE/TITLE/DATE KKUNU�._ Kronos Incorporated two 400 Fifth Avenue Waltham, Massachusetts 02154 PURCHASE ORDER ADDENDUM TERMS AND CONDITIONS 1. APPROVAL, DELIVERY AND PAYMENT All orders are subject to the approval of Kronos' corporate office in Waltham, Massachusetts and cannot be cancelled. Delivery of the Kronos Equipment, Software, and supplies specified on the Customer's Purchase Order Number specified below ("P.O.") shall be F.O.B. point of shipment. Payment terms are 50% deposit, balance due net upon receipt of invoice, unless other payment terms are approved in writing by Kronos. Customer shall also pay all reasonable transportation and handling costs and taxes on the Equipment, Software and supplies. Customer agrees to pay a late charge of one percent (1%) per month, (but not in excess of the rate allowed by law), on any overdue amounts. if full payment is not made within 90 days of final payment due date, Customer is responsible for all expenses, including legal fees, incurred by Kronos for collection. 2. LICENSE TERMS Kronos owns or has the right to license the Software. The Software contains proprietary trade secret technology. Unauthorized use and copying of such Software is prohibited by law, including United States and foreign copyrighf law. The price Customer pays for a copy of the Software constitutes a license fee that entitles Customer to use the Software as set forth below. Kronos grants to Customer a non-exclusive, nontransferable license to use the Software and the firmware contained in or downloaded to the Equipment, if any. This License may be terminated by Kronos by written notice to Customer upon any material breach of this Agreement by Customer. This License is subject to all of the terms of this Agreement, including those set forth below: (a) Customer recognizes and agrees that the license to use the Software is limited, based upon the amount of the license fee paid by Customer. Limitations may include the number of employees, simultaneous users, Software product modules, Software features, computer model and serial number, and/or the number of terminals to which the Software is permitted to be connected. Customer agrees to: 1.) use the Software only for the number of employees, simultaneous users, computer model and serial number, and/or terminals permitted by the applicable license tee; 2.) use only the product modules and/or features permitted by the applicable license fees; and 3.) use the Software only in support of Customer's own business. Customer agrees not to increase the number of employees, simultaneous users, terminals, product modules, features, or to upgrade the model, as applicable, unless and until Customer pays the applicable fee for such increase/upgrade. Customer may not relicense or sublicense the Software to, or otherwise permit use of the Software (including timesharing or networking use) by any third party. Cust... ter may not provide service bureau or other data processing services that make use of the Software without the express prior written consent of Kronos. (b) Customer may use the computer programs included in the Software (the "Programs") in object code form only, and shall not reverse compile, disassemble or otherwise convert the Programs into uncompiled or unassembled code. (c) Customer may copy the Programs as necessary to load and execute the Programs and for backup purposes only. All copies of the Programs or any part thereof, whether in printed or machine readable form and whether on storage media or otherwise, are subject to all the terms of this License, and all copies of the Programs or any part of the Programs shall include the copyright and proprietary rights notices contained in the Programs as delivered to the Customer. (d) In the event that Kronos supplies updates, corrections, modifications, new versions or new releases of the Software, (collectively referred to as "Updates'), such Updates shall be part of the Software and the provisions of this License shall apply to such Updates and to the Software as modified thereby. (e) Customer may terminate this License at any time by returning to Kronos the original copy of the Software and destroying all other copies of the Software. Upon termin&win of this License by Kronos, Customer will return the original Software to Kronos and destroy all other copies of the Software. (f) If Customer is licensing Timekeeper/AS Software, the following additional terms shall apply: Upon Customer's request and full payment of all license fees, Kronos shall license to Customer, for Customer's internal use only, the source code for the Timekeeper/AS application programs licensed to Customer. All of the terms and conditions specified in Customer and Kronos have accepted this P.O. Addendum on the dates below: (CUSTOMER) P.O. Number By: Title: this Addendum for object code shall also apply to the source code. Custome acknowledges and agrees that the Software, all source code, object code and algorithm: relating thereto, all user interface screens generated by the Software and source code and all copyright. trade secret and other proprietary rights therein, are and shall remair the sole and exclusive property of Kronos. Customer agrees that it shall not disclose c otherwise make available to third parties the Software unless such disclosure is necessary for Customer's permitted use of the Software. Furthermore. Customer mus obtain Kronos' written consent to any such disclosure and any such third party mus agree in writing to be bound by the terms contained herein. 3. LIMITED WARRANTY Kronos warrants that all Kronos Equipment and SofrivarE media shall be free from defects in materials and workmanship, for a period of ninety (90 days from the date of shipment. This warranty is extended to Customer only and shall no apply to any Equipment, (or parts thereof) or Software media in the event of: a) damage defects or malfunctions resulting from misuse, accident. neglect. tampering, (includin, modification or replacement of any Kronos components on any boards supplied with th= Equipment), unusual physical or electrical stress or causes other than normal anc intended use; b) failure of Customer to provide and maintain a suitable installatior environment; c) malfunctions resulting from the use of badges or supplies not approves by Kronos. Inking rollers, ribbons, light bulbs and fuses, if any, are excluded from this Warranty. EXCEPT AS PROVIDED ABOVE, THE PARTIES AGREE THAT ALL WARRANTIES EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY ANC FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE, ARE EXCLUDED. 4. LIMITATION OF LIABILITY Customer's sole remedy, and the sole liability of Kronos, for any breach by Kronos shall be to repair or replace, at Kronos' option, any parts or Software media found to be defective, without charge to Customer for parts or labor, provided that the Kronos Equipment and Software media have been installed. maintained and used in accordance with Kronos requirements and have not been subject to abuse or tampering. IN NO EVENT WILL KRONOS OR ITS PARENTS. SUBSIDIARIES OR AFFILIATES BE LIABLE FOR LOST PROFITS, LOST DATA OP ANY OTHER INCIDENTAL OR CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES ARISING OUT OF THIS AGREEMENT OR THE EXISTENCE, FURNISHING. FUNCTIONING OR CUSTOMER'S USE OF, OR INABILITY TO USE. ANY EQUIPMENT, SOFTWARE OR SERVICES PROVIDED FOR IN THIS ADDENDUM. 5. GENERAL This Addendum shall be governed by Massachusetts law and Customer agrees to submit to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Massachusetts courts. The invalidity or illegality of any provision of this Addendum shall not affect the validity of any other provision. The parties intend for the remaining unaffected provisions to remain in fuil force and effect. Customer shall not assign this Addendum or the License to the Software without the prior written consent of Kronos and any purported assignment, without such consent, shall be void. Neither party shall be liable for failures or delays in performance due to causes beyond its reasonable control, including war, strikes, lockouts, fire, flood. storm or other acts of God. Both parties agree to use their best efforts to minimize the effects of such failures or delays. All notices given under this Addendum shall be in writing and sent postage pre -paid, if to Kronos, to the Kronos address specified on this Addendum, or if to Customer, to the billing address on the front of Customer's P.O. Customer understands that any export of the Equipment or Software may require an export license and Customer assumes full responsibility for obtaining such license. Customer must obtain Kronos' written consent before exporting the Software. No action, regardless of form, may be brought by either party more than one (1) year after the cause of action has arisen, except that an action for non-payment may be brought by Kronos within two (2) years after the Customer's last payment. Except as provided herein, this Addendum supersedes all prior or contemporaneous representations, negotiations, or other communications between the parties relating to the subject matter of this Addendum. This Addendum may be amended only in writing signed by authorized representatives of both parties. The parties fully understand their responsibilities and do not rely on any oral or written representation not contained in the Purchase Order or this Addendum. In the event of a conflict in the terms of the applicable documents, the order of priority of documents shall be: (i) this Addendum, (ii) the handwritten or typewritten terms on the P. O. and (iii) preprinted terms on the P. O. KRONOSINCORPORATED By: Title: Date : Date: 9M M "el-1 KRONOSa July 26, 1999 Phil Brodeur St. Lucie County 2700 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Dear Phil: Thank you for the opportunity to work with your organization and address your frontline labor management needs. I have enjoyed working with you and your colleagues as we have discussed the value that Kronos and our products can provide to St. Lucie County ("St. Lucie County"). The purpose of this Statement of Work is to specify the services, training, and other implementation -related items ("Services") which Kronos and St. Lucie County have estimated and agreed are required by St. Lucie County for their Kronos products. The scope of the project, technical configuration, and roles and responsibilities of Kronos and St. Lucie County are defined in this Statement of Work and form the basis of the estimate of the services required. The estimates in this Statement of Work have been made based on St. Lucie County's fulfilling its obligations as defined herein. If St. Lucie County wishes to purchase services other than those described in this Statement of Work, St. Lucie County may purchase such services at the then applicable Kronos rate. Travel and expenses will be billed separately to St. Lucie County. The applicable sales agreement shall specify the Products purchased/licensed by St. Lucie County, and the prices for the Services. The Services are subject to all the terms and conditions of the Sales Agreement Scope The Services purchased by St. Lucie County will support the following Timekeeper C/S implementation schedule: • Timekeeper C/S will be implemented in 5 facilities. The following table defines the facilities, number of employees, and timing for the Timekeeper C/S implementation: Timekeeper C/S Statementy,.Work *Ag/ Page 2 Planned Implementation Dates (if known) Facility # Employees Start Date End Date Leisure Center 200 Library- 5 libraries 65 Finance 145 Mosquito 35 Road and Bridge 75 • Upon a full implementation there will be a single central Timekeeper C/S database. There will be approximately 550 employees in the database. Timekeeper C/S will be used from 5 sites. St. Lucie County estimates that Timekeeper C/S will support 25 concurrent users. If Timekeeper C/S will be implemented at facilities other than those listed above, St. Lucie County assumes responsibility at these additional facilities for software installation, configuration, and training. These services can be purchased from Kronos but are not included in this Statement of Work. Technical Configuration The agreed upon technical configuration for the Timekeeper C/S implementation includes the following. Any delay by St. Lucie County in providing, or lack of availability, of any of the items in the configuration will delay the Timekeeper C/S installation and may increase the total implementation cost. Network Wide Area Network is in place and connects the Poitras Annex (location where the C/S database server will be located) and the other facilities. Ethernet networks exist in the various facilities. T1 lines are in place to connect all of the 5 Library facilities to each other and the Poitras Annex. The Roads and Drainage, and Mosquito facilities are connected to the Poitras Annex using a 2 MB Wave LAN network. The Leisure Service facilities which consist of the Community Center, Tennis Courts, Recreation building, Stadium, and Golf Course; are connected using 28.8 modems. The estimated bandwidth being used by other applications is 20 %. Timekeeper C/S Statemen�,,Work 11"0 Page 3 Database Server The Database server will be provided by St. Lucie County. Price for the database server and any necessary database software is not included in this Statement of Work. A 333 MHZ (single processor)Pentium II Server will be purchased by St. Lucie County for use as the database server. The Microsoft SQL Server (6.5) database will be used. This server is not yet fully specified or ordered. The recommended specifications for the server include dual 166 MHz processors, 256MB RAM, and up to (6) 1GB disk drives. Clients PCs The minimum configuration for client PCs used by Timekeeper C/S users is Pentium 133 MHz or better CPU, 32 MB RAM, and 70MB of available disk space. St. Lucie County will install and/or upgrade PCs as necessary to meet this minimum configuration. The Administrator Desktop that performs the background totalizing process should be the preferred configuration of 233MHz or better CPU, 64MB RAM and 40-70MB available disk space. At least one Administrator Desktop will be required. Additional Administrator Desktops may be necessary for the system to perform at an acceptable level. The Communications Desktop that performs the Timekeeper Terminal communication process should be the preferred configuration of 200MHz or better CPU, 64MB RAM, and 40-70MB available disk space. At least one Communications Desktop will be required if Timekeeper Terminals are being used. Additional Communications Desktops may be necessary for the system to perform at an acceptable level. The recommendation for all client PCs is 256KB L2 cache and an IDE or SCSI disk controller. St. Lucie County will provide all necessary client PC hardware. Prices for client PC hardware are not included in this Statement of Work. St. Lucie County understands that PC hardware that is below the recommended requirement will adversely affect system performance. St. Lucie County also understands that Kronos reserves the right to modify hardware requirements as future versions of the product are released. St. Lucie County will be responsible for any hardware upgrades necessary to maintain acceptable system performance. Timekeeper C/S Statemen*,,;vvork ,400 Page 4 Data Collection The following table summarizes the data collection devices (15) expected to be used at each facility. Site Name Type of Timekeeper Terminal (Serial, Ethernet, Modem) Number of Timekeeper Terminals Mosquito Control Ethernet 1 Leisure facilities: Nursery Modem 1 Lawnwood Shop Modem 1 Sports Complex Modem 1 Golf Course Modem 1 Library facilities: Library Headquarters Ethernet 1 Morningside Ethernet 1 Port St. Lucie Ethernet 1 Hurston Ethernet 1 Lakewood Ethernet 1 St. Lucie West Ethernet 1 Finance facilities: St. Lucie West Courthouse Ethernet 1 Old Courthouse Ethernet 1 Finance Ethernet 1 Jury Room Ethernet 1 Roles and Responsibilities St. Lucie County agrees to provide the following qualified personnel to fill the roles needed to support the Timekeeper C/S implementation: Expected Time Commitment Name Pilot Phase Implement/ Rollout Post Rollout Project Manager Phil Brodeur Payroll Supervisor Joyce Abramowicz Sr. Management Contact Al Harbin Interface Specifications Desktop Services Admin Jackie Mosley Database Administrator Diane Gorman Network Administrator Jackie Mosley MIS Director Dennis Wetzel Network Supervisor Scott Sampson Timekeeper C/S Statemen-*,,, rk vim/ Page 5 St. Lucie County understands and agrees that unqualified or unavailable staff will delay the Timekeeper C/S installation any may require St. Lucie County to purchase additional Services from Kronos. These individuals, along with appropriate Kronos staff, will form the core project team. Contributions from other individuals will also be required during the implementation. Department managers or supervisors, payroll staff, and members of senior management will be required for payi-ule definition, possible payroll process changes, and Timekeeper C/S training. The following section defines the responsibilities for both St. Lucie County and Kronos during the Timekeeper C/S implementation. Planning and Status Meetings To assist St. Lucie County in planning the Timekeeper C/S implementation and monitoring the on -going status of the project: • St. Lucie County and Kronos representatives will participate in a Planning Meeting to answer additional implementation questions and develop detailed project plans. • Kronos will review with St. Lucie County the Timekeeper C/S implementation guide which defines in further detail Kronos' implementation approach. • Kronos will assist St. Lucie County staff in preparing for a Kickoff meeting and will attend the Kickoff meeting. • Kronos will participate in periodic status meetings to monitor implementation progress, identify issues and barriers, and develop plans to address these issues. These meetings or conference calls are currently expected to be held once per month during the implementation. Total time for Kronos staff to participate in these activities is estimated to be 5 days. Payroll Preparation A survey of current payroll practices must be completed to determine the payrules and workrules that apply to St. Lucie County personnel in various departments and facilities. Kronos will provide a payroll rules survey to be completed by St. Lucie County. Once St. Lucie County has completed the survey, Kronos will work with St. Lucie County to translate business payroll rules and policies into Timekeeper C/S payrules and work rules. These rules will be programmed into Timekeeper C/S during software installation.Instruction St. Lucie County plans to licence Timebank for Windows product from Integrated Design, Inc (IDI). St. Lucie County has determined that IDI will provide the interfaces needed to St. Lucie County's payroll system. St. Lucie County will purchase all software and templates necessary for the interface(s). St. Lucie County will install, configure and test the interfaces. Timekeeper C/S StatemenWork *40# Page 6 Kronos will facilitate the specification of interfaces, communications with IDI, and tracking of open issues between St. Lucie County and IDI. Each interface will be delivered approximately 30-60 days after specification for the interface has been completed. The following interfaces are included in this Statement of Work System to Interface Data Flow Date Needed Specification Cost Delivery Cost TimeBank To Banner 3.1 MFC From Banner 3.1 Kronos will assist St. Lucie County in further refining the payroll process to be used by St. Lucie County. The payroll process will include elements such as • who will maintain the roster of employees and how will Timekeeper C/S be updated • who will be responsible for establishing and revising schedules • the deadline for making punch edits before payroll • frequency of running selected reports and who will receive the reports Total time for Kronos staff to participate in these activities is estimated to be 3 days. Technical Readiness - Network During the process of demonstrating Timekeeper C/S functionality and discussing technical infrastructure requirements, St. Lucie County and Kronos agreed that Kronos should review network readiness and determine whether the network is sufficient to support the Timekeeper C/S implementation. Kronos will perform a Network Readiness and Performance Assessment to determine suitability of the current network. Tasks included in the Assessment are: • Work with your network staff to understand the layout of current network and, if applicable, the addressing scheme used in network routers - Work with your network staff to understand the magnitude of current network activity, especially at times with expected peak Timekeeper C/S usage • Determine the response time between clients and the server and, where necessary, detennine the number of network connections used between the client and the server This Assessment may determine that network performance issues exist and should be addressed prior to Timekeeper C/S installation. If this is the case, St. Lucie County may elect to have Kronos further diagnose the network and/or provide the solution once the problem becomes known. These diagnosis and solution services are not included in this Statement of Work. If these services are needed, Kronos and St. Lucie County will modify this Statement of Work accordingly. Timekeeper C/S Statemer�,, Work ,%� Page 7 Technical Readiness - Database Server St. Lucie County will be responsible for installing and configuring the database server. This includes hardware setup, installation and configuration as well as installation of the database software. St. Lucie County is also responsible for setting up the database according to the instructions in the Timekeeper C/S Installation Guide. Kronos will perform an audit of the Timekeeper C/S database server. The audit will verify that the server is properly configured and prepared for the Timekeeper C/S implementation. Tasks that will be performed during the audit include: • Verify that database devices have been defined properly and that sufficient disk space exists for Timekeeper C/S • Verify that database parameters have been set correctly • Understand other database applications that will reside on the same database server, if any, and discuss with your staff any performance implications Total time for Kronos staff to complete this activity is estimated to be 1 days. Technical Readiness - Client PCs The client PCs that will be used for Timekeeper C/S currently meet the specification required or St. Lucie County currently has plans to upgrade the PCs to meet the specification before they will be used for Timekeeper C/S. St. Lucie County will continue to ensure that client PCs meet the Timekeeper C/S specification. St. Lucie County will ensure that TCP/Ip and the correct version of DB-Lib and Net -Lib is installed on each client PC and is properly configured. St. Lucie County will ensure that each client PC can connect to the database on the server using SQL Plus or a similar tool. Technical Readiness - Timekeeper Terminals St. Lucie County will have responsibility for installing Timekeeper terminals. Terminal installation requires defining terminal location, running necessary cables, installing phone lines, and mounting the terminals. Final Connectivity Test Kronos will conduct a final connectivity and readiness test shortly before Timekeeper C/S is to be installed. This test will verify that necessary infrastructure is in place and properly configured. Some of the tasks included in this test are: • Verify that ping response time from Timekeeper C/S clients to server is 70ms or under • Verify that ping response time f-om Timekeeper terminals to Communication station is 70ms or under Timekeeper C/S Statement Work 1"0' Page 8 • Verify modem conununications between modem terminals to Communication PC • Verify that Timekeeper C/S clients can connect to database Verify the database devices/segments are properly defined and database parameters are set correctly Total time for Kronos staff to complete this activity is estimated to be 1 days. Software Installation Kronos will lead the initial installation of the Timekeeper C/S software. St. Lucie County staffs are welcome and encouraged to participate in the process to better understand how Timekeeper C/S works. St. Lucie County agrees to provide assistance from key personnel, such as the database administrator, as required during the installation. Members of the core team shall be available during the installation to provide any needed assistance. The tasks involved in the software installation include: • Run a script to initialize the Timekeeper C/S database • Install all client software on one client PC and test • Add Timekeeper terminals through Data Communications Manager • Validate communication to terminals Kronos will demonstrate the process to install the Timekeeper C/S client software to selected St. Lucie County staff. St. Lucie County will be responsible for installing the Timekeeper C/S client software on the remaining client PCs and testing the machines. St. Lucie County may choose to have one or more persons trained in this process so that St. Lucie County can install the Timekeeper C/S software on PCs purchased after the initial installation is complete. Total time for Kronos staff to complete this activity is estimated to be 2 days. Load Data Kronos will demonstrate how to use the Timekeeper C/S screens to load user accounts, user profiles, labor levels, employees, and schedules. Schedules are optional, the other information is required. St. Lucie County staff will be responsible for loading this data into the system. Using the payrule survey developed earlier, Kronos will program the payrules and workrules into Timekeeper C/S. St. Lucie County staff will participate in testing these payrules. Total time for Kronos staff to complete this activity is estimated to be 1 day. Timekeeper C/S Statemen%.,Work *40+ Page 9 Conduct Training Kronos will conduct training for St. Lucie County in the use and administration of Timekeeper C/S. The training classes included in this implementation are: Class Name Location # Times Class # Students will be Given Basic Kronos Education Center $400 per 10 Operations Maitland, Fl student System Kronor Education Center $400 per 2 Administration Maitland, Fl student Data Collection Kronos Education Center $450 per 2 Manager Maitland, F1 student Based on standard Kronos training rates, the fees for this training will be $ 5700.00 Start Up Support The initial period after installation of Timekeeper C/S typically requires on -site support from Kronos staff. The need for this support diminishes as your staff get more comfortable with Timekeeper C/S functionality, payrules are more thoroughly tested and modified as needed, and procedures become more routine. Some of the tasks performed in providing this support include: • Fine tuning of any payrule changes • Assistance with reports and edits • Support using payroll interface and other interfaces Our experience indicates that 19 days is typically necessary for an installation of similar scale and complexity. Additional support time can be purchased if needed. Timekeeper C/S Statemen,...,Nork *4000 Page 10 Summary of Cost for Services The fees for the Timekeeper C/S implementation are: Timekeeper C/S Implementation 19 Days $ 28,500 Planning 5 Days Payroll Preparation 3 Days Technical Readiness -Network 3 Days -Database -Clients -Timekeepers -Final Connectivity Test Software Installation 2 Days Load Data 1 Days Start-up Support 5 Days Training $ 5,700 Total Implementation Cost $ 34,200 Terms and Conditions This Statement of Work supersedes all prior or contemporaneous representations, negotiations, or other communications between the parties relating to Services. This Statement of Work may be amended only in writing signed by authorized representatives of both parties. St. Lucie County agrees to pay its own travel and expenses for the meetings and training described above. Phil, once again I want to thank you for the opportunity to work with your organization and address your labor management needs. If you have any questions regarding this Statement of Work, please do not hesitate to call. I look forward to working with you and your colleagues to make the implementation of Timekeeper C/S a success. Timekeeper C/S Statement"...Vork '"0 Page 11 Please sign on the space below and return a signed copy to me. By signing below and by signing the Sales Agreement, St. Lucie County agrees to purchase the Services described above. Sincerely, Lori Martin Sr. Sales Representative Kronos Incorporated ACCEPTED AND AGREED: St. Lucie County Authorized Signature/Title Date: Kronos and Timekeeper are registered trademarks of Kronos Incorporated. Timekeeper Web is a trademark of Kronos Incorporated. TimeBank for Windows is a trademark of Integrated Design, Inc. Revised 8/98 f THE F R O N T L I N E LABOR MANAGEMENT EXPERTS a a Workforce Timekeeper The following information provides a fiamework for the deployment ofthe Workforce Timekeeper® system and the Kronoe application database within your existing I.S. infrastructure. Workforce Timekeeper is a 32-bit application consisting of the following components: • Client Modules 3 Administration Modules • Communications Modules • Database Sehemas and Procedures i�nn..� 6csa�iwail trgvcaT�c ' It i system (RDBMS) on a host server. You can run the Workforce Timekeeper application database on any of the following RDBMS: • Microsoft SQL Server (Windows NT Server) • Oracle (UNIX and Windows NT Server) • Informix (UNIX) Components of the Workforce Timekeeper system communicate with each other over a TCP/IP network Although TCP/ IP is used, an internet gateway is not required; a private network is sufficient. The computers may be part of a local -area network (LAN) or a wide -area network (WAN). r-ralt D8mtsp �lrTi(I¢ none tupamnrf wr=o nViltmince isnrY5e((e Bett98406and EDO dam l cvlsc4l�n torrririi6i I* clinical Datas eet The Workforce Timekeeper application is installed on multiple workstations running Windows 95/98 or NT Workstation. The database is stored on a host server running the UNIX or NT Server operating system. The Workforce Timekeeper system uses a multi -tiered architecture consisting of multiple PCs and a database server. The workstations accommodate: • Client Modules — reside on the Supervisor and/or Payroll PC(s) and run the software that allows access to supervisory functions ofthe Workforce Timekeeper system (e.g., adjusting employee hours or wages, altering employee schedules and accessing labor management reports). • Administration Modules — reside on the Administration PC and run the background processor. The background processor manages the creation and storage of employee hours, wages, and accrual balances. Communication Modules — reside on the Communication PC and run the software that manages the communication process between the application and the Timekeeper terminals. The Database Server accommodates: Database &hemas & Procedures — reside on the host server on which the RDBMS is installed (i.e., for use with the Workforce Timekeeper applications). Operating System, RDBMS, and Middleware Requirements The following presents the combinations of versions for the operating system, RDBMS, and corresponding middleware supported by the Workforce Timekeeper application. (Note: In the following tables, a (+) indicates the minimum supported revision.) N ierasoft SGL Server The following shows the versions of the operating system, Microsoft SQL Server RDBMS, and corresponding middleware required by the Workforce Timekeeper system: �� : )�131 T�Bx �esvare• �� Windows NT Server 4.0 6.5, SP 5A+ 6.50+ NetLib 6.50+ The following shows the versions of the operating system, Oracle RDBMS, and corresponding middleware required by the Workforce Timekeeper system: 77 HP UX 10.2 7.3.4+ SQLNet 2.3+ 8.0.4+ Net8 8.0.4+ IBM AIX 4.3.2 7.3.4+ SQLNet 2.3+ 8.0.4+ Net8 8.0.4+ Sun Solaris 2.6 7.3.4+ SQLNet 2.3+ 8.0.4+ Net8 8.0.4+ Compaq Tru64 UNIX 4.OD ffi—edy known as DEC IIAVQ 7.3.4+ SQLNet 2.3+ 8.0.4+ Net8 8.0.4+ Wmdows NT Server 4.0 7.3.4+ SQLNet 2.3+ 8.0.4+ Net8 8.0.4+ The following shows the versions of the operating system, Informix RDBMS, and corresponding middleware required by the Workforce Timekeeper system: •:.:�F` HP UX 10.2 7.3.0+ Connect 7.2+ IBM AIX 4.3.2 7.3.0+ Connect 7.2+ Sun Solaris 2.6 7.3.0+ Connect 7.2+ Citrix WinFrame Workforce Timekeeper also supports Citrix WinFrame 1.8 on client PCs running Windows 95/98 and NT Workstation 4.0. Please consult your Citrix representative for additional WinFrame information regarding applicable hardware and software requirements. En Tethnical Datas eet zy art, rnaq it amantz The following table shows the minimum and recommended configurations for the Workforce Timekeeper Client workstations. Client Desktops Function: Runs the Workforce Timekeeper Runs the Wodrforce Timekeeper supervisory & employee supervisory functions. maintenance functions. Operating system: Windows 95/98 andWmdows NT Windows 95/98 and Windows NT Workstation 4.0 Workstation 4.0 CPU (Intel): Pentium 133-MHz (minimum) Pentium 133-M1-Iz (minimum) 200-MHz or better (recommended) 200-MHz or better (recommended) 256-KB L2 Cache (minimum) 256-KB L2 Cache (minimum) Memory: 64-MB RAM (minimum) 32-MB RAM (minimum) 96-MB RAM orbeuer (mmmmmkd) 64-MB RAM or better (recommended) Disk space: 70-AS for client executables 70-U B for client executables Other Requirements: CD-ROM reader CD-ROM reader (or access to one on the network) (or access to one on the network) Network Interface Card Network Interface Card Monitor. 800 x 600, 256-colors Monitor. 800 x 600, 256-colors The following table shows the minimum and recommended configurations for the Workforce Timekeeper Communication and Administration workstations. Communication Desktop AdrniniatmAnn ?7Qclr+n.. Function: Runs the communication to the Runs the background processor Timekeeper data collection terminals Operating system: Windows 95/98 andWindows NT Windows 95/98 and Windows NT Workstation 4.0 Workstation 4.0 CPU (Intl): Pentium 133-MHz (minimum) Pentium 133-MHz (minimum) 200-MHz or better (recommended) 200-MHz or better (recommended) 256-KB L2 Cache (minimum) 256-KB L2 Cache (minimum) Memory: 32-MB RAM (minimum) 32-MB RAM (minimum) 64-MB RAM or better (m mmended) 64--MB RAM or better (mommended) Disk space: 40-MB for communication executables 40-MB for application server executables Other Requirements. CD-ROM reader CD-ROM reader (or access to one on the network) (or access to one on the network) Network Interface Card Network Interface Card Monitor. 800 x 600, 256-colors Monitor. 800 x 600, 256-colors Database Server Requirements The ongoing hard disk requirements for Workforce Timekeeper's system data depend on a number of variables. Please consult your Kronos Representative for disk space usage guidelines appropriate to your company's environment. KR�NCJS` (800) 225-1561 +1 781 890-3232 www.kronos.com ® 1999, Kronor Incorporated. Kronos, the Kronos logo, and Timekeeper are registered trademarks of Kmnos Incorporated. All other product and company names mentioned are used for identification purposes only, and may be the trademarks of their respective owner. Ail specifications are subject to change. All rights reserved Printed in the U.S-A. IT;� NO. C-6-8 DATE: 4-27-99 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ l CONSENT Ix ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: OMB PRESENTED BY: Harvey Lincoln SUBJECT: Authorization for Banner and Y2K required automated systems improvements. BACKGROUND: A reserve of $250,000 was established in the General Fund to be used for Y2K related automated systems needs as required. Staff has identified actions which need to be taken for which it would be appropriate to use these funds (see attached memoramdum). The cost currently identified is $169,600. We recommend that the Board authorize the transfer of these funds for the equipment and services as requested. Note that staff has recommended the establishment of two positions for continuing Banner support. That need is = addressed in this request, but will be considered in the budget review process. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds will be made available by transfer from account #001-9910- 599330-800, PREVIOUS ACTION: Establishment of Y2K reserve RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the transfer of funds and acquisition of equipment and services as requested. COMMISSION ACTION: [ ] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Doug Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: Management & Budget: XX Purchasing: Originating Dept: Public Works: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) *40e ''40' PURCHASING DEPARTMENT TO: Harvey Lincoln, OMB FROM: Charles L. Bicht, Sr., Purchasing Manager DATE: April 20, 1999 SUBJECT: SCT Banner Attached is a copy of the memorandum I sent to the County Administrator outlining the costs necessary to bring the SCT Banner Systems into Y2K compliance and beyond. The following is a breakdown by accounts for those costs: For Y2K compliance 551501 Office Supplies - Computer upgrade 60 PC's 4,000 add disk capacity to 2 servers 1,000 5,000 564000 Equipment upgrade dial -in capability 4,000 4 new servers 10,000 Kronos 13 new clocks 26,000 40,000 531000 Professional Services SCT - Fixed Assets 20,000 SCT Release 3.1 8,000 Training 10,000 SCT Utilities 2.2.1.2 30,000 Training 6,000 74,000 H:\WP\MEMOS\Banner accaunts.wpd 'fir►` '4W 568000 Software Kronos Software 20,000 Other Requirements and Services 551501 Office Supplies Computers upgrade 26 PC's 7,000 upgrade Unix Server 3,600 10,600 531000 Professional Services . SCT Remote DBA contract 20,000 In my memo to the County Administrator I indicated the need for additional staff to support the Banner Systems. This is still a viable need, but will not be requested at this time. The additional staff will be addressed during the `99-2000 budget process. H:\WP\MEMOS\Banner accounts.wpd **AV, *4/` M E M 0 R A N D U M PURCHASING DEPARTMENT TO: Doug Anderson, County Administrator i FROM: Charles L. Bicht, Sr., Purchasing Manager DATE: April 16, 1999 SUBJECT: Banner Task Force At the meeting on Monday you directed. the task force to prepare information on the items and costs necessary to bring the SCT Banner systems into YZK compliance and beyond. Attached is a detailed compilation of those items and costs. cc: Phil Freeland Dennis Wetzel Harvey Lincoln Chris Hartley Sharon Bouton Marie Gouin Al Harbin Jackie White Hank Dufour Joe Finnegan Patty Wallace H:\WP\MEMOS\3aaner Task Force l.wgd ,..,;anner Upgrade Costs -40 Finance Upgrade to 3.1 1. Hardware upgrade for 60 PCs 4,000 2. Upgrade dial -in capability 4,000 3. Upgrade 4 servers to Novell 4.11 (FIN, CTSLC, OAS, AS2) 10,000 4. Add disk to 2 servers (CA, Comdev) 1,000 5. SCT - Fixed Assets 20,000 6. SCT - Upgrade to Release 3.1 8,000 7. Training 10,000 Total for 3.1 upgrade 57,000 Utilities Upgrade 1. SCT - Upgrade to Release 2.2.1.2 (GU, Y2K) 30,000 2. Training 6,000 Total Utilities 36,000 Kronos Upgrade 1. Upgrade to Windows 95 version for Y2K 20,000 2. 13 Clocks - $10,400 to $26,000 26,000 Total Kronos Upgrade 46,000 Total Y21K Compliance 139,000 Finance Upgrade to 4.0 1. Hardware upgrade for 26 PCs 7,000. Banner Maintenance 1.2 additional staff 100,000 2. SCT - Remote DBA contract - Finance & Courts 20,000 3. Upgrade FUN Unix server for test environment - add 12 GB 3,600 Total Additional Maintenance 123,600 Total Beyond Y21K 130,600 1. Banner Finance Upgrade to version 3.1 The $57,000 listed on the attached sheet is the bare minimum necessary to bring Banner Finance into Y2K compliance. The next available date for SCT to come on site is May 17, 1999. Prior to May 17' items 1 - 4 must be completed. Automated Services will dedicate the resources to accomplish the necessary hardware upgrades. 2. Banner Utilities Upgrade to version 2.2.1.2 The cost stated $30,000 will bring the Banner utilities system into Y2K compliance. 3. Kronos Upgrade The Kronos time clock system was originally purchased in the late 1980's. As with many of the County's assets it was not kept up to date. That is why the costs are so high. $20,000 to upgrade software and $10,400 to $26,000 to replace the thirteen clocks that are more than twelve years old. The spread on the cost to replace the clocks comes from the functionality that is available in the new clocks. Kronos is a business partner with SCT. The time information gathered by the Kronos system will cross over to Banner without. manually keying in the information. 4. Banner Finance upgrade to 4.0 Version 4.0 will be available in the fall of 1999. This version has a complete rewrite of the Purchasing module. I have viewed some of the enhancements at the Summit and believe this will fix many of our current problems and create new capabilities for the Purchasing Department. 5. Banner Maintenance This is the most important piece of the equation if the County is to move ahead into the future. The two added staff will give the Automated Services department the ability to maintain the system and enhance the system. We will need to have the ability to perform Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), paperless approvals and change orders and provide.cross.over Kronos and our Purchasing Card in the near future. The County must commit to the additional staff or resign to the fact that the maintenance personnel will be spending all of their time putting out fires and the Banner system will never function to its capabilities. 7. Training Training dollars have been placed in various areas. For ongoing training a budget of $25,000 is requested. Erl Staff has worked hard this week to put these figures together. There was not much time to totally investigate all of the options. The costs reflect what staff thinks is necessary to complete the job. Funds are available in the reserve for Y2K to cover those items directly associated with Y2K. Also, there are additional funds available in the Automated Services budget to cover the items not directly associated with Y2K. 14000 ITEM NO. C-3-13 DATE: August 17, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBJECT: Award of Bid #99-064 Campsite Electric - Savannas Campground BACKGROUND: On June 16, 1999 bids were opened for the replacement of the campsite electric at the Savannas Campground. Sixty bidders were notified, seven sets of bid documents were distributed and three bids were received. Staff decided that with the funds available the most critical area that needs to be done is area two. The low bidder for area two is Pipeline Energy in the amount of $26,000.00 and $804.12 for the Public Construction bond. FUNDS AVAIL.: 315-7220-546200-765 (Savannas Maintenance Improvement Project) W %11,�,S mm01\ RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of bid #99-064 Campsite Electric - Savannas Campground to the low bidder for that area in the amount of $26,804.12 including the Public Construction Bond and authorize the chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. [,/APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ]' OTHER: County Attorney:(X) Originating Dept: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable)_XX_ noerson Administrator Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & Budget:(X) ``L "" Purchasing Mgr.:(X) _ Other: Other: Eff. 1197 H:\WP\AGENDAS\BIDS\99-064 award.wpd MEMORANDUM CENTRAL SERVICES TO: Harvey Lincoln, OMB FROM: Nick Dragash, Manager, Central Services DATE: August 2, 1999 SUBJECT: CAMP SITE ELECTRIC - SAVANNAS CAMPGROUND Bid #99-064 --------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- Central Services requests the subject bid be awarded to: PIPELINE ENERGY in the amount of $26,000.00 (Area Two) 804.12 (Bond) $26,804.12 The funds available are: 315-7220-546200-765 (Savannas Maint. Improvement Project) //(/IV � ND:bk NICK DRAGASH OMB APPROVAL' IVA �"�(Signed) (Date) En �Y ra lN FM 'v m m a o Z< nz n m < r- z 400 -' m n v O o � � o 0 � c o M _ °D o co cn m r o m m 40 z z Cl to co o m 0 � � N n 400 o C < z o m m o X W Lcja n 0 0 ;u oo mz -mo� v�0 �o `,rm� ctn0 44b z m > rn c' n CO m co r Cep m n O o n z z n CA 0 -v c� O c z v v C O z m m I *we BID FORM ,", All bids must be submitted in a sealed envelope addressed to the St. Lucie County Purchasing Manager, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Room 228, Fort Pierce, Florida 34982, plainly marked on the outside with bid number, date and time of bid opening. BID #99-064 Replace Camp Site Electric - Savannas Campground Florida Scientific Industries, I I, Randy M. Fries REPRESENTING D /B /A Pipeline Energy Company and/or Corporation, agree to perform all of the requirements to complete the work required in the specifications for the price of. 1. Area One 2. Area Two 3. Area Three 4. Bid 3 Areas BM $ 21,850.00 $ 26,000.00 $ 14,000.00 $ 61,850.00 $ 804.12 E 432.99 1,912.89 Public Construction Bond Instructions: 1. Do not include Public Construction Bond cost in Base Bid . 2. Unless this requirement is waived by the County Administrator this cost will be added to the bid cost and the vendor will supply a 100% Public Construction Bond for this project. Bid Obligation It is understood that this Bidder is bound by the bidding documents and that the bid may not be withdrawn during a period of 60 days after bid opening. The Board of County Commissioners and reserves the right to waive any informalities or minor irregularities, reject any and all bids which. are incomplete, conditional, obscure, or which contain additions not allowed for, accept or reject any bid in whole or in part with or without cause, and accept the bid which best serves the County. NAME OF BIDDER: Florida Scientific Industries, Inc d/b/a Pipeline Energy ADDRESS: 270 Talleyrand Avenue �%Q- � ��-� 3 PHONE: 904-791-9000 �- SIGNED BY: Randy M. Fries ,'G l; 3 TITLE: Master Electrician DATE: 6/15/99 -30- �i' *"e r. THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS A/A Document A3 70 Bid Bond KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we Florida Scientific Industries, Inc. dba Pipeline Energy as Principal, hereinafter called the Principal, and Capitol Indemnity Corporation Wisconsin a corporation duly organized under the laws of the State of as Surety, hereinafter called the Surety, are held and firmly bound unto St. Lucie County as Obligee, hereinafter called the Obligee, in the sum of Five Percent of the Amount Bid Dollars t3 ** 5% ** ). for the payment of which sum well and truly to be made, the said Principal and the said Surety, bind ourselves, our heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns, jointly and severally, firmly by these presents. WHEREAS, the Principal has submitted a bid for Electric Upgrade NOW, THEREFORE, if the Obligee shall accept the bid of the Principal and the Principal shall enter into a Contract with the Obligee in accordance with the terms of such bid, and give such bond or bonds as may be specified in the bidding or Contract Documents with good and sufficient surety for the faithful performance of such Contract and for the. prompt payment of labor and material furnished in the prosecution thereof, or in the event of the failure of the Principal to enter such Contract and give such bond or bonds, if the Principal shall pay to the Obligee the difference not to exceed the penalty hereof between the amount specified in said bid and such larger amount for which the Obligee may in good faith contract with another party to perform the Work covered by said bid, then this obligation shall be null and void, otherwise to remain in full force and effect. Signed and sealed this 16th . egL�—' - y5;� / . qve'/� l (witness) day of June tific P 1999 tries, Inc. dba- (Seal) ® rude) Capitol Indemnity Corporation ure > (Sea# IVY_ - Wendy A. Dyger rift Attorney —In —Fact AIA DOCUMENT A310 • BID BOND • AIA• • FEBRUARY 1970 ED • THE AMERICAN INSTITUTE OF ARCHITECTS, 173S N.Y. AVE., N.W., WASHINGTON. D.C. 20006 rR . JIM 4810 UNIVE;S17Y `:VENUE, SUIT E 1400, NJACISON, `NISCONSiN 53708-09CC FL=A.SE ADCFESS F_?LY TO RO. BCX 5900, MADISON, tM 537C5-CSCO F CNE (508) 231-4450 • FAX (E08) 231-2029 �+ T J 1r1"A 1'1* 1 i Oi.�1r 1 7 k a wGl v ,, + :.. ,.� i7 � Sr zsy- 1W rrirc pal _- Lam Ir the ^� ^ - ., , ".i.� .�, a aka, c ' t`e ^-d ��c tc 1,. ��4, (jt; vl �+it21.fi1.�r�,ll-y S!n , {rL 0.5 r;l , Lvi}y.� i4 .Glt a .. • -a ^k ROBEttT'T. THEUS, FTTZHUGF B. POWEM, JR., WENDY A: "DYGERT FTTZHUGH K. ,POWELL,,-MARY E MULCAHEY OR,,. CAROLYN P DREW _ a%d la\ ifo �'�a,7rq- ew 11 err-,cvir 'Q 'c`8,k?, 'c.': lit , S2 band delltief t an v3f1 It L' ri tlf, S i;r� if= ,ani ra _.tea act Ord :gad, any anti o f b ttd , ; dam+ takir`lC^ �;d cc rats # sdretysh1p, rc .j a. t �a bcnr ci u> dei cl .rg �;, �,cr; ; =ct or�;yship X�otufef �t>zoe� �i�s euth��*;r s�a'I axe In �f: aunt the sum ;ry N $2,OOD,000 OT TO F.CEEri " > rt This rower of Atfomey Is grai i and Is s►gn2d ar,l4 sealed by facsimlle'�nder and i3y•the at,tl+onty Cf 1irg Resolution. edcDta oy the Hoard of Directors of CAPITOL l' D� -%Ng1MC.0RPQR�,70H at a meet},�g dt,ly, caifao and : t>210 tt tfTe nth day t3f �lty � y �i v SDL�fEG thal u`f.�r�;dettt and Vice ? �srL�ert,tFe : ecr tart' arTraCIA atrar� sctingmuidualfy ar"aerwrise be and they Ite(cby aT.r 2d': e �C' anc�:�uU o�zailon to: at pe�^i b�;a ?c\Ner of: or,��ey for the �urpcses �ml� ol;gxecufii�� a}3d a�esting bonds ar ,ur%dert2ii�r+gs ns�.�ther.::: cbhg i� ir, the ratcl>a �r�qt,. ne or more res,dent *aca-pre�arts s �startt se .stapes ant€ ati rney(s) in fact.::: a#a ..:, t tc`h4\.i •�^a ;,EwsrS;ar d1 tfes u9ti at b s, r; bi�ic s tc the busini3ss this orr a y�t#t 's�gnatis�e of su f1 �ears::annd seal of the Gofatfy, tray aff, o' to an}y si h.P er arat mey,L'E iA ate. certificats relatin theiat�:}by fe'c$iirsie, ar9id an ksp0 pa cer € afl:&ney or cartfica;�'�eadrg:such -aps;j h :;':' signatures or facs mite seal shad-L val,d and b,nd,ng upon° 1e t;ompany, an c3 any suc prnver so e�rablfted and certified by facsi.nMle signatures aril" facsimile seal shall be valid and binding upon the Com;.any in the future with respect to any bond or undertaking or other writing obligator, in the r�tt:re thereof to ,vhich i �S attached. Any such appointm;maye revoked, for cause, or uviihDut cause by any at said officgs, at any. tuna:_°... IN 1PIMN ;•i 0 ,the JTi 1_ Mt?E1,J 9 K00 1POR 9 1 ham G2uS d h s re eats be s r�r .d by is Meer understles anJ €rporatse¢i to h2ra#oifl3C2d duly ai%st b�tsetretary, 7 st day of .tfn"t93. _ x.r x ! ,�. `h. "` ,x, .:: C 33 x�,' rya /�� Vs �i l� �i,T C ?A flR 4` 1 If+1 nmru f u �y1.NfTY 4+��G ,fit f . VfrgiOne quite, Sec etary ,�°d RFM,ax ' Ged sit; President b STATE OfI S: ;: .. - 'hat- K `S: �` .. •�... •S< ..> „` `' COui Wb'F O DAME k On the 1 st dja off9g, A Q , t93, be&E me #fto afly came George A tarn kr wn to beriz by dine du ►ct;. did deposed that h 1 fife%of Daner;tac,�'#iafz le t l,sldt or O PIT I_ 1�lD 11 Y �P r 3iC3 or arauorx descnbed In anc wE tc �, ed > s a e l t rr,4m: that legnrs�vs the see,.c� sd`ceror ttIeFal id to'sald strrfn�isiii crraa[,Y�bat vuv to by order of ;ar�i ofilr�ofs o �lccorl�nr►d that he scdlnartef`otb�� t� arrfsr 1�0F '4a:r g -.,y,,a'°Qc ,:K,,Wir*,"x ISwCiQ�v1St I,N w'� y aw'21;:. s• .. y _ .„P 'xSTAT= 7}' Y N • :q »,� d ;" cii:. t�sr'0 8r E! Hans. TO, wOtl#C, D21iBCQx lv�l �t'D7€fi: �1Ee? r rmavx .. z_ S trx W 3- � c ,� � w . �`,/` � Y n o wqx c "t s� x v,P " �5'�. �" :. �e c xc • � � •r , � a: { •�1� �•`X•Y � �. . ='w � ��'�s.� x��r. �,:_'` c � 'f"•.� i r � ��y'' c," #' `�` tO�y r � ''� .� � ��,�. - ,a�.' Cfx` -- 1 `-the undefsigned,: duly; elected, ta;ahe office stated beCi now the ►ncumbent; n CAPITOL ;.INDEMNITY . RPORATION; p Visc`o ;51ii Co motion; onz d inake this-cerT te;_ R.( F1ER RT that tki ore going h DirectorSr atta -of .! a %'-•E lm' lJ r t been rer� ed Power Hof s, _etf ned and t1f -�� Q� ; }� :.e`. CORPORA ' +� Pauf Ere Fteasurer . Y J�.3o-"`J+ 3�Uy1 ,Qa")"�tt �.,•,y JF. '-EYjy�. '*1^ 1 101"aR g• K g{e� Z �. y�, SY Y ) aMt>ae`{.! {L \> �4�� •� xM,pov 1s�!t d rely ti pcs— of attorney a7 n v t tt-.5 upp r cat ae ` rs in red Phctsxca s ari s or, y�$ aP) P } athe replod qns ire nit b to o the'ccmpany Inc %S ConAemin�tFsts pav�ie of a to[sney s lay bs �ilrabted #a the 8c ia9ariag ;at e . ffice°af. thaprTof T� j h y a en�tr tr~ AGENDA REQUEST ITM NO. Q-{ DATE: August 10, 1999 REGULAR[ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Assignment of Revocable License Agreement - Paul Miret and Karen Miret to Richard S. Love and Barbara J. Love BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the assignment of the January 16, 1990 Revocable License Agreement to Richard S. Love and Barbara J. Love, his wife. COMMISSION ACTION: [ /APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: Review and Approvals Management & Budget G Low Originating Dept. Public Works Dir.: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Anderson Administrator Purchasing: Co. Eng.: Eff. 5/96 cn 1 INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 99-1049 DATE: August 11, 1999 SUBJECT: Assignment of Revocable License Agreement - Paul Miret and Karen Miret to Richard s. Love and Barbara J. Love BACKGROUND: On January 16, 1990, the County approved a Revocable License Agreement in favor of Paul Joseph Miret and Karen Marie Miret for installation of a driveway culvert. A copy of the Agreement is attached. Mr. Miret recently sent a letter requesting the county approve the assignment of the Agreement to the new owners of the property - Richard S. Love and Barbara J. Love, his wife. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the assignment of the January 16, 1990 Revocable License Agreement to Richard S. Love and Barbara J. Love, his wife. Respe4ptfully submitted, Daniel S. Mclnt '-') County Attorne; DSM/caf Attachment Per.�srnt= Fi "(STEM PHONE NO. Paul .Miret Paul i & Ksrers b( miret 757 SL•' flidden Rivr_r Ur Px St Wilie FL 34983-279S f,+1g. 09 1999 13 • J7PM P1 Copy 116eA �Af1-1 E Syr �,�-- - 6,2 3.r ram►-!/.�-T:�x !� �^,��� w,9.y (` Cf �G� vti 7-- •• /, � ^�.����/-��� ///Iy//a yam• j rfir `� C ('�IiYP 1,09`%t e, (s 'E< ow ra— i r -A dem.4 f, eflo4kgo s 1C)VIC_- � 4 -r S v ln,- 2`- s /Li i FF.I?'l Fana-.�nic FPX SY'=TFM =+CNE WDI. +:y. @? ]9y9 "PM P2 REVOCABLE LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR INSTALLATION OF DRIVEWAY CULVERT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this j 0q day of 3990, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a po1'_ti.cal su division. of the State of Florida, hereinafter called "County" and PAUL JOSEPH MIRET AND KAREN MARIE MIRET, 757 Sadden River Drive, Port St. Lucie, Florida 34983, hereinafter called` "Owners". WHEREAS, the Owners are constructing a home on property described as Lot 19, Block 1. Hidden River Estates; and WHEREAS, the Owners have requested permission from County to install a driveway culver•; within County's drainage easement es identif::ed in attached Exhibit "A" in order to gain access to Owners' property; and WHEREAS, the County has agreed to authorize the installation Of the driveway culvert within the drainage easement subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this revocable license agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. The County agrees to grant the Owners a iimit.ed revocable license for the purpose of installing and maintaining a driveway culvert within the above -described drainage easement and for the purpose of crossing the easement to gain access to Owners' property. Z. This license may not be assigned by Owners without the prior written consent of County. :3. The County shall have the right to terminate this Agroement and require removal of the culvert at Owners' expense upon ninety (90) days written notice to owners if, in the bole discretion and judgment of the County Engineer, the culvert i'nstallstion interferes with the drainage requirements of Hidden River Estates subdivision. The County Engineer may, in lieu of termination., request that the Owner perform certain alteration or maintenance activities within the drainage easement. However, if 511 rR?'" Faras,13':ti FP:, "_Try' ?H[hE P10. Leg. ar9 _-9q ,D1;:5sPr P.3 such activities are not performed to the specificatiors of tre County Engineer, County shall be entitled to exercise its right to terminate this Agreement. 4. The driveway culvert shall be constructed and maintained solely at the expanse of Owners under the supervision of owners, englnear and in full compliance with all specifications of County as determined by the County Engineer and as depicted on attached Exhibit "V . The location or the culvert within the easament is subject to the approval of the County Engineer. 5. The Owners shall indemnify and hold the County harmless from and against ail claims, liability, demands, damages, expenses, fees, fines, penalties, suits,, proceedings, actions and costs of actions, including reasonable, attorneys fees of any kind or nature arising or in any way connected with the use, occuratzon, =®nagwnert, or control of the above property by the Owner or its agents, servants, employees, patrons, or invitees, or resulting in injury to persons or property, or loss of life cr property of any kind or nature whatsoever, sustained during Owners' use of County property. IN ►dITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year above first STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE Seto -re me personally appeared PAUL JOSEPH MIRET AND V-4REx MARIE MiRET to me well known and known to se, to be, the persons described in and who executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged to and before me that PAUL JOSEPH P41RET AND KAREN MARIE MIRET executed said instrument for the purposes therein expressed. -2- FP:,: S'--TEr PtCPE= NC. `111110� Ic -r �4- 09 1?99 P4 *4000 WITNESS my hand and official real, this day of*-*. Notary Public State of Florida�j My Commission Expires: pjjsLj117ATI Of FLORICA- 093. STTZST. ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORK A" CORRECTNESS ASSISTANT COUNTY &Ittomry -3- ASSIGNMENT OF REVOCABLE LICENSE AGREEMENT On this day of August, 1999, the undersigned assignors, PAUL JOSEPH MIRET and KAREN MARIE MIRET, hereby sell, assign to RICHARD S. LOVE and BARBARA J. LOVE, Assignees, all rights to that certain Revocable License Agreement dated January 16, 1990. Assignees accept the Assignment. By signing this Assignment, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida approves the Assignment of the Revocable License Agreement from the Assignors to the Assignee. Signed by the Assignors this day of August, 1999. WITNESSES: PAUL JOSEPH MIRET KAREN MARIE MIRET Signed by the Assignees this day of August, 1999. WITNESSES: RICHARD S. LOVE BARBARA J. LOVE This Assignment was approved by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County this day of , 1999. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ATTEST: ST. LUCIE COUNTY Deputy Clerk BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. DATE: August 17, 1999 REGULAR[ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Appointment of Successor Paying Agent and Registrar (U.S. Bank Trust National Association) - Escrow Deposit Agreement dated February 19, 1997, for the County's North Hutchinson Island Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 1992 BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Agreement of Resignation, Appointment and Acceptance and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement. COMMISSION ACTION: [ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Review and Annrovals County Attorney: Management & Budget Originating Dept. Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Administrator Purchasing: Other: Eff. 5/96 INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO. 99-1062 DATE: August 12, 1999 SUBJECT: Appointment of Successor Paying Agent and Registrar (U.S. Bank Trust National Association) - Escrow Deposit Agreement dated February 19, 1997, for the County's North Hutchinson Island Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 1992 ------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------- BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of a letter dated June 19, 1999 from Michael J. Marra, Vice President of U.S. Bank National Trust Association to Harvey Lincoln. Also attached is a proposed Agreement of Resignation Appointment and Acceptance between the County, South Trust Bank, National Association and U.S. Bank Trust National Association. The effect of the proposed agreement, if adopted, would be to accept the resignation of South Trust Bank, National Association as Paying Agent and Registrar for the escrow deposit agreement referenced above, and accept U.S. Bank National Trust Association as successor Paying Agent and Registrar. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the June 1, 1999 Agreement of Resignation, Appointment and Acceptance and authorize the Chairman to sign the Agreement. Ily submitted, yr 1v Daniel S. cln County Attorn DSM/caf Attachments Copy to: B. Leedy R. Freeman, Esq. AGREEMENT OF RESIGNATION, APPOINTMENT AND ACCEPTANCE, dated as of June 1, 1999, by and among the St. Lucie County, Florida (the "County"), SouthTrust Bank, National Association, (the "Prior Escrow Agent") and U.S. Bank Trust National Association ("Successor Escrow Agent"). RECITALS: WHEREAS, the County and the Prior Escrow Agent or its predecessors entered in to one or more Escrow Agreements more fully described on Exhibit II attached hereto (the "Escrow Agreement") pursuant to which the County has refunded all, or a portion of its bonds or other securities more fully identified on Exhibit II attached hereto (the "Certificates"); and WHEREAS, the Prior Escrow Agent has determined to resign from its capacities as Escrow Agent pursuant to the Escrow Agreement; and WHEREAS, the County desires to appoint Successor Escrow Agent as Escrow Agent to succeed Prior Escrow Agent in such capacities under the Escrow Agreement; and WHEREAS, Successor Escrow Agent is willing to accept such appointment as Successor Escrow Agent under the Escrow Agreement; and NOW, THEREFORE, the County, Prior Escrow Agent and Successor Escrow Agent, for and in consideration of the premises and of other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, hereby consent and agree as follows: ARTICLE I THE PRIOR ESCROW AGENT SECTION 1.01 Prior Escrow Agent hereby resigns as Escrow Agent under the Escrow Agreement. SECTION 1.02 Prior Escrow Agent hereby assigns, transfers, delivers and confirms to Successor Escrow Agent all right, title and interest of Prior Escrow Agent in and to the trusts of the Escrow Agent under the Escrow Agreement and all the rights, powers and trusts of the Escrow Agent under the Escrow Agreement. Prior Escrow Agent shall execute and deliver such further instruments and shall do such other things as Successor Escrow Agent may reasonably require so as to more fully and certainly vest and confirm in Successor Escrow Agent all the rights, powers and trusts hereby assigned, transferred, delivered and confirmed to Successor Escrow Agent as Escrow Agent. On the Effective Date (as defined below), Prior Escrow Agent shall deliver or shall cause to be delivered to Successor Escrow Agent all original documents, files, bondholder records, monies and investments held by Prior Escrow Agent under the Escrow v4✓ Agreement and will make available to Successor Escrow Agent all books, records and evidence of transactions relating to the monies held, and funds and accounts maintained by or on behalf of the Prior Escrow Agent. ARTICLE II THE COUNTY SECTION 2.01 County hereby accepts the resignation of Prior Escrow Agent as Escrow Agent under the Escrow Agreement. SECTION 2.02 All conditions relating to the appointment of U.S. Bank Trust National Association as Escrow Agent under each of the Escrow Agreements have been met to the satisfaction of the County and the County hereby appoints Successor Escrow Agent as Escrow Agent under the Escrow Agreement effective as of the Effective Date. ARTICLE III THE SUCCESSOR ESCROW AGENT SECTION 3.01 Successor Escrow Agent hereby represents and warrants to Prior Escrow Agent and the County that Successor Escrow Agent is qualified to act as Escrow Agent and that Successor Escrow Agent meets the qualifications identified under the Escrow Agreement. Successor Escrow Agent hereby accepts the County's appointment as provided in Section 2.02 above. Successor Escrow Agent will give all required notices under the Escrow Agreement. ARTICLE IV MISCELLANEOUS SECTION 4.01 This Agreement and the resignation, appointment and acceptance effected hereby shall be effective the date the last party to this Agreement has executed the same (the "Effective Date"). To the extent if any consents other than the County's are required, such properly executed consents shall be attached hereto as Exhibit I. SECTION 4.02 {RESERVED} SECTION 4.03 This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Florida. SECTION 4.04 This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, each of which shall be an original, but such counterparts shall together constitute but one and the same instrument. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Agreement to be duly executed and delivered upon the Effective Date. PRIOR ESCROW AGENT: SouthTrust Bank, National Association By: Its: COUNTY: St. Lucie County, Florida By: Its: SUCCESSOR ESCROW AGENT: U.S. Bank Trust National Association By: Z - Its: Vice President 0 EXHIBIT I Agreement of Resignation, Appointment and Acceptance consented to and approved. NONE REQUIRED M CM EXHIBIT II Escrow Agreements • Escrow Deposit Agreement, dated as of February 19, 1997, by and between the Issuer and Prior Escrow Agent Bond Issues or Other Securities St. Lucie County, Florida Escrow Deposit Agreement, dated as of February 19, 1997, for the County's North Hutchinson Island Water and Sewer System Revenue Bonds, Series 1992 M AGENDA REQUEST 1*0 ITEM NO. 4. DATE: August 17,1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED Y: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): County Administration /Jz� County Administrator SUBJECT: Request for Approval of Settlement Agreement With Florida Department of Environmental Protection (DEP)for Water Attenuation Facility Planning BACKGROUND: Since April 11, 1995, St. Lucie County has participated in the Regional Attenuation Facility Task Force planning program to determine the feasibility of constructing water preserve areas to reduce stormwater flows into the St. Lucie River and Indian River Lagoon. The DEP provided funding for the planning project. Prior to completion of the first phase of work, the contract expired with funding in the amount of $5,761.45 owed for printing of the project plan. The attached settlement agreement authorizes payment of the $5,761.45 from funds under Amendment #1 to DEP Contract No. SP440. FUNDS AVAIL.: Amendment #1 to DEP Contract No. SP440 approved by the Board on June 8, 1999. PREVIOUS ACTION: The St. Lucie County Commission established the Regional Attenuation Task Force on April 11, 1995. Contract funding has been continued through Amendment #1 to DEP Contract No. SP440. RECOMMENDATION: it is requested that the Board approve the attached settlement contract agreement with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for payment of $5,761.45 for printing of the initial Regional Attenuation Task Force report. COMMISSION ACTION: APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Do Coun Coordination/Signatures : Purchasing: Attorney: y Mgt. & Budget: Finance: iI r._.,,.- Berson Administrator Other: Other: SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this day of , 1999 by and between the DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, an agency of the State, (hereafter "Department"), 3900 Commonwealth Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399-3000 and the ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, (hereinafter, "CONTRACTOR'). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 287.058(1), F.S. a procurement of contractual services in excess of $15,000 is required to be evidences by a written agreement embodying all provisions and conditions of the procurement of such services, including but not limited to subsections (a), (b), (c), (d), and (e) and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 287.058(2), F.S., except in cases involving a valid emergency, said written agreement is required to be signed by both the agency head and the contractor prior to the rendering of services, and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 287.058(2), F.S., if the agreement is not signed by both parties, and if a valid emergency does not exist, the agency head is required no later than thirty (30) days after the contractor begins rendering the service to certify the specific conditions and circumstances, as well as describe actions taken to avoid the recurrence of the noncompliance, and 'fir► '"o WHEREAS, contractual services described in the invoice between the Contractor and the Department attached as Exhibit A have been rendered without a fully executed contract authorizing the work, and the agency head has not within the prescribed thirty (30) day period either certified a valid emergency, or in the absence of a valid emergency, certified the specific conditions and circumstances which caused the noncompliance, and WHEREAS, the Office of the Comptroller, State of Florida (Comptroller Memorandum No. 4 (87/88) requires a settlement agreement be executed for services rendered without a written agreement, within the prescribed thirty (30) day period and in accordance with statutory requirements, and WHEREAS, the Contractor has a claim for payment for the said services, and the Department desires to settle and discharge such claim, and WHEREAS, the Contractor agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, in the performance of the work subject of this settlement agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual convenants set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: WHEREAS, under a former agreement (DEP Contract No. SP365) funded by General Appropriations Line Item No. 1239B, 1995-96, between the Department and the Contractor (the Contractor being *4W *"0 the Facilitator, work on the attenuation study was initiated by the Regional Attenuation Facility Task Force, and, WHEREAS, to the Department's unknowing DEP Contract No. SP365 lapsed prior to the Contractor's timely completion of the project, and, WHEREAS, under said former agreement, the Department advanced the full amount for the agreement to the Contractor, in the amount of $150,000.00, and WHEREAS, to the Department's unknowing, the Contractor rendered services prior to execution of said former agreement, and the Contractor was compensated for such services through a Settlement Agreement entered into between the Contractor and the Department in the amount of $24,076.57, and the Department entered into a subsequent agreement with the contractor to continue services as set forth in Exhibit B. Whereas unknowing to the Department the Contractor rendered services prior to the execution of Exhibit B, and, a. The Department approves the Contractor to pay the sum of Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Sixty One Dollars and 45/100 to subcontractors for services rendered without a written agreement. b. Upon receipt of payment, as provided in paragraph (a), the contractor, for its attorneys, heirs, executors or administrators, does hereby fully, finally and forever release and discharge the state of Florida, Department of Environmental m Protection, and its agents, representatives, and attorneys, of and from all claims, demands, actions, causes of action, suits, damages, losses and expenses, of any and every nature whatsoever, arising out of or in any way related to the contracts and state project and invoices of such work including, but not limited to, those claims asserted or other claims that were or maybe asserted in any federal, state or local agency or court, by or on behalf of the contractor. C. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the parties and their respective legal representatives, successors, and assigns. d. The Contractor agrees to be bound by the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit B, attached hereto and incorporated by reference herein, for performance of the work which is subject of this settlement agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this agreement to be duly executed the day and year last written below: ST LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS By: Chairman or designee Date: Approved as to form and legality: STATE OF Florida DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION T�d BySecret ry osignee h Date: u°-S-19 Rn AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COM'.ISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Leisure Services SUBJECT: Specialist Agreement - Alma Lewis BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE PREVIOUS ACTION: ITEM NO. Q-f2if ._ DATE: August 17, 1999 REGULAR [ PUBLIC HEARING [ CONSENT [X PRESENTED BY: Michael Leeds RECOMMENDATION: Sta=- recommends that the Board Goprove the Agreement and authorize the Chairman tc sign the Agreement. COMMISSION ACTION: [ ] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [V] OTHER: PULLED Dougria Anderson Count Administrator Coordination/ Sicrnatures County Attorney: Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing: i Originating Dept.:;: " 1 Leisure Services Other _ Finance (Check for Copy only, if applicable): W I INTER -OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Michael Leeds, Leisure Services Director DATE: August 11, 1999 SUBJECT: Specialist Agreement - Alma Lewis BACKGROUND: For seventeen years, Mrs. Alma Lewis has had an agreement with the County to operate and maintain the concession stands at Lawnwood Recreational Complex. During this time, Mrs. Lewis has operated the concession stands during softball, baseball and football games along with any special events occurring at the complex. Upon request, Mrs. Lewis has operated the County's mobile concession stand at events conducted at other sites. Over the years Mrs. Lewis has proven to be a dependable asset in the operation of Lawnwood Recreational Complex. Mrs. Lewis receives thirty percent of the gross receipts from the operation of the concession stand. The County retains the remaining seventy percent of the gross receipts. In light of the increasing revenue generated by the concession stand, in recent years, it would now be appropriate for the Board to approve the existing agreement. RECOMMENDATION/ CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the current Specialist Agreement with Alma Lewis. Attachment Respectfully Submitted, AV�. Michael Leeds Leisure Services Director Ave SPECIALIST AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this /< day of 1998, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the "County", and ALMA LEWIS, hereinafter referred to as the "Specialist". WHEREAS, the County desires to engage the services of the Specialist for: To operate and maintain County's concession stands located at Lawnwood Recreation Complex, 19' Street and Virginia Avenue, Ft Pierce, Florida, hereinafter referred to as "Complex." The County shall supply the Specialist with all food and other necessary supplies to properly operate concession stands. County will conduct an inventory of all goods in stock at the end of each month to compare cost of goods to gross sales. County shall set hours of operation. WHEREAS, the Specialist is willing to provide such services to the county. NOW, THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows: 1. The Specialist shall be responsible for providing the above listed activity at the following facility. Specialist shaU operate concession stands at Softball Fields 1, 2 & 3; Baseball Field d Football Stadium, along with any other special event at the Complex. 2. The Specialist is an independent contractor and is not an agent or employee of the County. Nothing in this Agreement shall be interpreted to establish any relationship other than that of an independent contractor between the County and Specialist, its employees, agents, subcontractors, or assigns, during or after performance of this Agreement. The Specialist shall take the whole responsibility of the work and shall bear all losses resulting to him, or it, on account of the amount of character of the work or because of any other causes. 3. The parties agree that the Specialist will be compensated with the sum equal to Thirty Percent (30%) of the gross receipts from the activity. The County will -r retain a sum equal to Seventy percent (70%) of the gross receipts. Specialist will deposit receipts weekly to the Recreation Division Office, 1302 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida. Compensation to Specialist will be made the following week. 4. The Specialist shall and will forever hold harmless the County from and against all negligent or/and gross negligent acts which arises out of or in connection with the performance of the contract which causes any liabilities, claims, recoveries, costs, and expense because of loss of, or damage to, property, or injury to or the deaths of any persons. 5. The Specialist shall be responsible for knowing and fulfilling all reporting requirements of the Tax Equity and Fiscal Responsibility Act of 1982 and other Federal, State, or local Laws, rules and regulations. Form 1099 will be issued annually to report these payments. 6. The term of this agreement shall be from October 1, 1998 to September 30, 2000. Either party may terminate this Agreement upon seventy-two (72) hours written notice to the other party with or without cause. 7. The Specialist shall not assign this Agreement. 8. All notices required in this Agreement shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, to the following address, unless otherwise specified by a party: As to County St. Lucie County Administrator Administration Annex Fort Pierce, FL 34982 As to Specialist: Alma Lewis 118 Vindale Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34951 Social Security No. 23M2-5323 With A Copy To: St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 -2- In M IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement on the date as indicated below: WITNESSES Var/i,s�,;i cam. WITN S: /rl � -3- Co�nty Administrator APPROVED, AS TO FORWAD CORRECTRES, / County A SPECIALIST: BY: DATE: M 11"o AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ITEM NO. C-7a DATE: August 17, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] SUBMITTED BY: OMB PRESENTED BY: Harvey M. Lincoln SUBJECT: Budget Resolution # 99-208 appropriating funds for the Federal Section 112 MPO Planning grant passed through the Florida Department of Transportation in the amount of $326,798 for the period from 7/1199 to 6/30100. BACKGROUND: St. Lucie MPO has received a letter dated 8/2/99 from the Florida Department of Transportation with an authorization to expend up to $326,798 for the FY00 Unified Planning Work Program. Total award will reach $517,000 when the additional allocation of $190,202 is authorized after 10/1/99. This grant calls for a county match of 18.07% ($24,305). Provision for the local match has been made in the FY99-00 budget. Actual expenditures for the period starting 7/1/99 through 9/30/99 will be cost shared with the current fiscal year local match calculated into the predecessor MPO Planning FY99 grant #001116. The original local match required for the grant #001116 was $22,717, out of which we spent $16,535 through 6/30/99. FUNDS WILL BE AVAILABLE: 001126-1510-331130-100 Section 112 MPO Planning Grant PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Budget Resolution #99-208 establishing the budget for the FY00 Federal Section 112 MPO Planning grant from the Florida Department of Transportation. COMMISSION ACTION: [APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: A g Anderson Administrator Coordination/Sianatures County Attorney: XX Management & Budget: XX Purchasing: Originating Dept: Public Works: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX Other: G:\budget\wp\agenda's\agenda99\8' 17NTO_Grant.wpd on t RESOLUTION NO. 99-208 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners budget for St. Lucie County, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption of the budget have become available from Florida Department of Transportation in a form of a pass through FY00 Federal Section 112 MPO grant in the amount of $326,798. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 171' day of August, 1999, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 1998-99, and the County's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 001126-1510-331130-100 APPROPRIATIONS 001126-1510-512000-100 001126-1510-521000-100 001126-1510-521100-100 001126-1510-522000-100 001126-1510-523000-100 001126-1510-523100-100 001126-1510-524000-100 001126-1510-525000-100 001126-1510-531000-100 001126-1510-541000-100 001126-1510-541300-100 001126-1510-547005-100 001126-1510-549000-100 001126-1510-549110-100 Federal Highway Administration $326,798 Salaries $30,000 FICA $1,860 FICA Mandatory $435 Retirement $3,045 Group Insurance $4,500 Life Insurance $166 Worker's Compensation $750 Unemployment Compensation $100 Professional Services $275,942 Communications $1,000 Postage $500 Printing & Binding- Materials $1,000 Advertising $1,500 General & Administrative Charge $6,000 After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX Commissioner John D. Bruhn XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 17T" DAY OF AUGUST,1999. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA G:\budget\wp\agenda's\agenda99\8' 17 WO_Grant.wpd m m M CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY G:\budget\wp\agenda's\agenda99\8' 17NIPO_Grant.wpd sir✓ _ "*0 QQI l �-(0 Florida Department of Transportation JEB BUSH 3400 WEST COMMERCIAL BOULEVARD GOVERNOR FORT LAUDERDALE, FLORIDA 33309-3421 TELEPHONE: (954) 7774593; FAX (954) 7774197 DIMION OF PLANNING AND PROGRAMS August 2, 1999 The Honorable Mary Ann Cernuto, Chairwoman St. Lucie Metropolitan Planning Organization 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982-5652 Dear Councilwoman Cernuto: THOMAS F. BARRY, JR. SECRETARY ID AW - 5 19% COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FL SUBJECT: St. Lucie Metropolitan Planning Organization Fiscal Year 1999100 Unified Planning Work Program Financial Project No. 233493-1-14-01 Federal -Aid Program. No. PL-0311 (37) The St. Lucie Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO) is now authorized to expend up to $326,798.00 of Federal Section 112 (PL) Funds for the Unified Planning Work Program for the period July 1, 1999 through June 30, 2000. This is a partial authorization of PL Funds for the MPO for Fiscal Year 1999/00. The Department will provide the MPO with a Modification Letter, which will increase the State's commitment to the full amount requested by the MPO after October 1, 1999, when the State's Fiscal Year 1999/00 apportionment of PL Funds is provided by the Federal Highway Administration. At that time, PL Funds will be allocated to the MPO and the .authorization will be increased by $190,202.00, for a total of $517,000.00, which will be the full amount available for programming in the St. Lucie Metropolitan Planning Organization Fiscal Year 1999100 UPWP. This authorization is subject to: Provision of the required matching amounts by the MPO and the State; Compliance with any conditions which may have been placed on the individual UPWP tasks; and Furnishing of all required documentation with requisitions. www.dot.state.fl.us ® RECYCLED PAPER M The Honorable Mary Ann Cernuto, Chairwoman August 2, 1999 Page 2 Please contact this office if you have any questions or require additional information. Sincerely, A. Yesbec , P.E. Director and Programs JMY: tc cc: Cheri Fitzgerald Stacie Blizzard Teddi Sheffield Gustavo Schmidt Mike DeRosa Nmoy Lucero (A5115) File: 233493-1-14-01 M AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: OMB ITEM NO. C-7b DATE: August 17, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] PRESENTED BY: Harvey M. Lincoln SUBJECT: Request for authorization to submit a grant application on behalf of the St.Lucie County Sheriffs Office. BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County Sheriffs Office has filled out an electronic application to participate in the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant offered by the US Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance. Anticipated award is preliminarily calculated at $58,870. Required local match of $6,541 is provided for in the Sheriff's FY00 Budget. FUNDS WILL BE AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve electronic submission of the application for the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant, and authorize the Chairman to sign the application. COMMISSION ACTION: [APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CONCURRENCE: Anderson Administrator Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: XX Management & Budget: XX/14Purchasing: Originating Dept: Public Works: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX G:\budget\wp\agenda's\agenda99\8' 17 LLEB G_Grant. wpd M MEMORANDUM TO: MIKA GORIEWICZ BUDGET ANALYST ST. LUCIE COUNTY MANAGEMENT & BUDGET DEPT. FROM: CAPTAIN MIKE GRAVES ST. LUCIE COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE DATE: AUGUST 5, 1999 SUBJECT: LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT BLOCK GRANT COUNTY COMMISSION AGENDA REQUEST NUMBER: 08059902 Here is the information you requested: 1) - BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County Sheriff's Office has filled out an electronic application to participate in the Local Law Enforcement Block Grant offered by the U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs. The Sheriff's Office plans to expend $58,870.00 toward the purchase of an Automated Fingerprint Identification System Latent Print Workstation. Federal payment will cover up to $58,870. A 10% cash match is required. The match calculated based on an adjusted award amount is $6,541.00. The Sheriff's Office has the required local match. 2) - Attached is a copy of the on-line application signed dated and certified by the Undersheriff. My e-mail is still down. Please page me at 343-4099 to confirm whether we are still on the Agenda for August 10. Thanks! cc/ Dennis M. Williams - Undersheriff Major David Walters - Director of Law Enforcment Major Richard Duncan - Director of Administration Henry Walker - Comptroller Sgt. Bobby Gregg - Identification Unit Supervisor 0 gn 25 Pagel of 2 Part II LLEBG Application Local Law Enforcement Block Grants Application Fiscal Year 1999 e following is a printout of your jurisdiction's online application or the Fiscal Year 1999 Local Law Enforcement Block Grants (LLEBG) Program. Your jurisdiction's chief executive officer (or an official delegate) has completed the information listed below and electronically submitted it to the Bureau of Justice Assistance (BJA) for approval. fficer tion ame: Douglas IlAdministrator Title County nderson Programmatic Contact Information .caress: z juu irginia Ave. Fort ierce 34982 1450 X Michael Title Address: 4700 West Midway Ph: (561) Graves Captain Road Fort Pierce FL 34981 462-3611 X http://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov:8003/gms/plsgl/llebg_ rain_pkg.certified 7/28/99 0 qW Page 2 of2 The Omnibus Fiscal Year 1999 Appropriations Act, rublic Law i U:)- 277, provides funds for the implementation of the LLEBG Program, to be administered by BJA, U.S. Department of Justice. The purpose of the LLEBG Program is to Provide units of local government with funds to underwrite projects to reduce crime and improve public safety. The LLEBG Program allows jurisdictions to find criminal justice initiatives in the following seven purpose areas: supporting law enforcement; enhancing security measures; establishing or supporting drug courts; enhancing the adjudication of cases involving violent offenders; establishing multijurisdictional task forces; establishing community crime prevention programs; and indemnification insurance. The LLEBG Program is administered y the State and Local Assistance Division, BJA. If you have any questions, please contact us at (202) 305-2088. e * indicates required Certification: ennis M. Williams Undersheriff Saint Lucie County ATTESTED BY: J'kf Date AUTHORIZATION TO SUBMIT ELECTRONIC GRANT APPLICATION: ST LUCIE BOCC CHAIRMAN DATE: http://grants.ojp.usdoj.gov:8003/gms/plsgl/llebg_main_pkg.certified 7/28/99 zn AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ITEM NO. C-7c DATE: August 17, 1999 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] SUBMITTED BY: OMB PRESENTED BY: Harvey M. Lincoln SUBJECT: Budget Resolution for increase of funds available from the FDEP White City Park Grant. BACKGROUND: On October 16, 1996 St. Lucie BOCC accepted a $100,000 grant award from the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for the enhancement of recreational facilities at White City Park. Leisure Services Department is currently working on the project completion. Fiscal Year 1998-99 grant budget was originally estimated at $92,030; however, the actual amount should have been $98,128.75, due to the fact that a total of $1,871.25 had been spent through the end of FY98. Budget increase of $6,099 is warranted in order to bring the grant budget to the correct level. FUNDS WILL BE AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A 001228-7240-334391-7959 White City Park Grant FDEP RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve Budget Resolution 99-209 increasing the current budget for the FDEP White City Park grant. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: s [/APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: (dug Anderson my Administrator Coordination/Si natures County Attorney: : XX Management & Budget: XX Purchasing: Originating Dept: Public Works: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX Other: G:G:\budget\wp\agenda's\agenda99\8' 17 WhiteCity_Grant.wpd M n RESOLUTION NO. 99-209 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners budget for St. Lucie County, certain funds not identified at the time of adoption of the budget have become available from the FloridaDepartment of Environmental Protection in a form of a grant for the White City Park enhancement of recreational facililites. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resolution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembled this 171h Day of August, 1999, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 1998-99, and the County's budget is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 001228-7240-334391-7959 Dept. Of Environmental Prot - Phys Env APPROPRIATIONS 001228-7240-563000-7959 Improvements O/T Buildings After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner Paula A. Lewis XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX Commissioner John D. Bruhn XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 17T" DAY OF AUGUST, 1999. /_ 111*4 i BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY $6,090 $6,090 G: G:\budget\wp\agenda's\agenda99\8' 17 WhiteCity_Grant.wpd fir+' -%'0r AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-7D DATE: August 17, REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ CONSENT [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Harvey Lincoln SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): OMB/Automated Services SUBJECT: Approve Budget Amendment BA99-131 and EQ99-225. BACKGROUND: The recent power failures caused the batteries to fail in the power supply for the computer room, resulting in the computer equipment problems. The current batteries are not providing the necessary level of power for future power failures. In order to insure the computer equipment remains operational in future we need a budget amendment to replace these batteries at a total cost of $8000.00. FUNDS AVAIL: Funds will be made available in account 501-9000-564000-800 which is part of the Automated Services regular budget under equipment purchases. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve Budget Amendment BA99-131 and EQ99-225. COMMISSION ACTION: [ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: Originat' Dept, Other: Finance: (Check for Co21.7py only, Ddu9tas Anderson Co ty Administrator Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing: Other: if applicable) Eff. 5/96 r 4 cm AUTOMATED SERVICES DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: Douglas Anderson, County Administrator FROM: Dennis Wetzel, Director, Automated Services DATE: August 2, 1999 RE: Power Failures The power failures last week caused the batteries to fail in the Power Supply for the computer room on the first floor. This resulted in computer equipment problems. The batteries we have are not providing the necessary level of power we need for riding out future power failures. In order to insure the computer equipment remains operational during future storms or power failures, we need to replace these batteries at a total cost of $8000. This is a request for funds to be allocated to purchase replacement batteries for the back up power supply. This is an emergency situation and not a budgeted item. With your concurrence OMB could transfer funds or allocate funds from Central Services/Admin General Maintenance to cover this cost. Please advise what your preference is on this matter. DW/ca cc: Philip Freeland BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST F000d REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: OMB/Automated Services PREPARED DATE: August 11, 1999 AGENDA DATE: August 17, 1999 TO: 501-9000-564000-800 FROM: 501-9000-541000-800 Machinery & Communications REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: Replacement back-up batteries for power for Automated Services. CONTINGENCY BALANCE: THIS AMENDMENT: REMAINING BALANCE: DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: 99-131 for 1 $8,000 1 OMB:QP/GENERAUFORMS/AMENDMEN eff. 10/01/94 i m $ C/) S $ 2 � ® E. 3 > o � / 0) m $ q $ ° $ z O CO �. z 2 w' LU UCL w 0 D w � w z �LL » 0 $ LL w O w CL « . ■ W .� co w : 0 W 02 W IL \ CY / W / . � b o � cr- � � \ ? � . Q- 0 k , A % 2 � 2 U w z LLI LU / k 0 � . q z 0 P k / C \ o r" a 7 f � 2 2 § � \ D k co/ § / ( k k @ Q o & e 2 / § o) a R k \ # A co k \ Q* o ° ::3 § / k 0 2 § E ° 2 R # £ 2 2 k \ / / Co a k \ w C:L "Coco q. k¢k/ \ 7 t $ f 0 § $ / 2 2 f / S? / \ ? 0 A t / 2 k CO § \ ° § Co\ 2 2 co @ 2 / k f / % 6� w m s � 2 w 2 n 0 U U « LO � k 7 B w � 2 w ■ a err` ITEM NO. C-8 DATE: August 17,1999 CONSENT [X] REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] Leg. [ ] Quasi -JD. [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT):Community Development (( rV 00&Z_ 7 Department Head SUBJE('T: Authorize an amount not to exceed $1,215 to place a joint ad with the Chamber of Commerce in the 2000 Florida Trend "Business Florida" publication. BACKGROUND: The St. Lucie County BOCC Economic Development Division and the St. Lucie County Chamber of Commerce Economic Development Division would like to sponsor a joint advertisemnt in the Florida Trend -Business Florida 2000" Publication. The cost for a black and white 1/3 page advertisement would be $2,430 with the Chamber of Commerce and St. Lucie County Economic Development Division each bearing 1/ of the cost. A letter from the Chamber of Commerce is attached. "Business Florida" is widely used for business recruitment and a presence in the publication will generate a great deal of exposure for the joint economic development efforts of St. Lucie County and the Chamber. FUNDS AVAIL.: 001-1515-549000-100 - General Fund/Econ. Dev./Advertising W114AV110DA T4#*010).11FINESSE= RECOMMENDATION: Authorize an amount not to exceed $1,215 to place a joint ad with the Chamber of Commerce in the 2000 Florida Trend "Business Florida" publication. COMMISSION ACTION: [ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: Originating Dept: Mgt & Budget: Other: Coun Anderson Administrator Purchasing: Other: Finance: (copies only): �StaC� aunty amber Of Commerce Fort Pierce 22M Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34M (561) S95-9999 FAX (561) 461-9084 E SLC CHAMBER PAGE 01/01 In*a6rtnersh/p with St. Lucie County • Po*ft. Lucie and Fort Pierce C S; to create and promote economic development Port SL Lucie To: Julia Shewebluk, SLC Community Development Director 16M SE Port St. Lucie Blvd. From: George Haygood, F. D. MarketingDirector Port St. Lucie.IL 34 561) 595.9999 952 Date: August 10,19" FAX (561) 335-4448 Re: Florida Trend Ad Invest In St. Lucie PUBLIC PARTNERS St. Lucie County City of Fort Pierce City of Port St, Lucie PRIVATE PARTNERS Council for Econonac Opportunity PLATINUM INVESTORS Lawnwood Regional Medical Center St. Lucie Medical Center The Tribune Harbor Federal Martin Memorial GOLD INVESTORS Lindahl, Browning. Ferrari & Hellstrom, Inc. The Port St. Lucie News Riverside National Bank First National Bank & Trust Tropicana WalMart Foundation NUI/City Gas Via Fax The intent of this letter is to inform you we, the St. Lucie County Chamber of Commerce will participate with the county on an ad to be printed in the Florida Trend Magazine. I understand, the Chamber's portion will be ($1200.00) 50% of the total cost of the ad. BUSINtSS FLORIDA"02'000 Florida's Official Economic Development Publication 126,750 Total Distribution Targeted Distribution Outside Florida............ o9e9651250 Public and Private Company CEOs, VIP Subscribers, Site Selectors, Top Commercial and Residential Real Estate Brokers, Business Service Firms, Tenant Relocation Advisers, Management Consultants, Real Estate Developers, Investment Bankers, Accounting Firms Targeted States, Regions and Cities Alabama Birmingham; California Fresno, Los Angeles, Orange County, Sacramento, San Diego, San Francisco, San Jose, Santa Rosa; Arizona Phoenix; Connecticut Hartford; Georgia Atlanta, Marietta; Illinois Chicago; Indiana Indianapolis; Kansas; Kentucky Louisville; Massachusetts Boston, Worchester, Michigan Detroit, Grand Rapids; Minnesota Minneapolis/St. Paul; New Jersey; New Mexico; New York Albany, Buffalo, Long Island, New York City, Rochester, Syracuse, Westchester -Fairfield; North Carolina Raleigh, Research Triangle, Charlotte; Pennsylvania Harrisburg, Philadelphia, Pittsburgh, Wilkes-Barre; Texas Austin, Dallas, Fort Worth, Houston, San Antonio; Virginia Arlington; Washington D.C.; Wisconsin Milwaukee; Washington Seattle; Pacific Northwest Vancouver Targeted Industry Sectors Silicon Technologies, Electronics Manufacturing, Automotive, Aviation, Aerospace, Information Technologies, Health Care Technologies, Printing & Publishing, Food Processing, Defense -Related Industries, Marine Industries, Simulation & Training, Film and Entertainment, Hospitality Visitor Industry, Industries Supporting Education and State Government, Environmental Industries, Trucking and Transportation, Public Warehouse and Storage, Business and Financial Services, Corporate and Regional Headquarters, Electric Utility -Related Industries, Agriculture, Forestry and Fishing Direct Request and Inquiries..............................19, 750 Includes Municipal and County Governments, Economic Development Offices, Chambers of Commerce, Elected Officials, Newstands-Nationwide, Select Bookstores, Direct Request Inquiries to Enterprise Florida and Economic Development Commissions throughout Florida Market Data and Research Providers...................4, 700 Includes Small Business Development Centers, Florida Division of Corporations, Colleges and Universities, State Agencies, Key Florida Business Leaders and Executives Tend Distribution Continued ► Florida Trend Custom Publishing Division - 490 First Avenue South - St. Petersburg, FL 33701-727/821-5800 International and National Trade Shows Trade Missions, Conferences and Conventions... 3 7, 05 0 Includes distribution via Enterprise Florida International Offices, Enterprise Florida International Trade Division, World Trade Centers, Ports and Airports, Enterprise Florida Manufacturing Technology Centers, Innovation and Commercialization Centers, Primary and Regional Economic Development Offices, Governor's Office of Tourism, Trade and Economic Development (OTTED) International Cities Tokyo, Toronto, London, Seoul, Sao Paulo, Mexico City, Frankfurt, Taipei, Singapore, Hong Kong, Sydney, Santiago, Caracas, Paris, Vancouver, Milan Additional Countries Germany, Spain, Costa Rica, El Salvador, Barbados, Colombia, Peru, Ireland, Chile, Israel Trade Shows Aviation and Aerospace, Environmental Technologies, Laser and Electro-optics, Medical and Pharmaceutical Products, Office Automation, Telecommunications, Military -related, Health Technologies, Information Technology, Electronics Manufacturing, Bank Technology, Research and Technology Transfer, Software Consulting Services Total DIstr'l'but'l'on,.,................126,750 Qualified 8t Guaranteed 8011US! Reader Service Reply Card — To get your area or your company on the relocation and expansion "Short list," Business FloridaTm 2000 will feature a special Reader Service Reply Card as part of our lead generation system. The Reply Card lets you know exactly who's interested in your area and why. It's also designed to provide more in-depth information, such as when your prospects are looking to move and what their special needs or concerns are. Twice monthly, we'll input this data for you and generate a customized report of all the prospects who are ready to start talking business. The primary lead generation is done for you, so all you have to do is follow up with the contact. Regional Market Manager Orlando, Central and North Central Florida, Treamm Coast and the Space Coast Laura Peters 407/740-6344 1-peters FloridaTrend.com Corporate Headquarters 490 First Avenue South St. Petersburg, FL 33701 727/821-5800 Tend