The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutAgenda Packet 01-06-04 \.-r -...I AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. ;(1) DATE: January 6, 2004 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 04-24 - Supporting the establishment of fair and equitable rates for developmental disability services for the Florida Department of Children and Families. BACKGROUND: The Florida Department of Children and Families Developmental Disabilities Program Office has announced that it will reduce reimbursement rates offered to agencie~ that provide residential and adult day training services for those with developmental disabilities beginning November 1, 2003. Cheryl King, Executive Director, has requested that this Board support the establishment of fair and equitable rates for developmental disability services. The attached Resolution No. 04-24 has been drafted for that purpose. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: ~taffrecommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 04-24 as drafted. . COMMISSION ACTION: CE: CONCU (~APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 Do la Anderson COUll Administrator County Attorney: y Review and Approvals Management & Budget purchasing : Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 '-" ....",,¡ AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. ;;;ß DATE: January 6, 2004 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 04-27 - Proclaiming January 6,2004 as "Eddie Enns Day" in St. Lucie County, Florida. BACKGROUND: After eight years as Mayor for the City of Fort Pierce, Florida, and twelve years as County Commissioner for St. Lucie County, Florida, Mr. Eddie Enns has closed his political career. The attached Resolution No. 04-27 has been drafted for that purpose. FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: .Staffrecommends that this Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 04-27 as drafted. ¡)(] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 CE: COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: Jy Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 AGENDA REQUEST """ ITEM NO. 5' A ~ DA TE: January 6, 2004 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [ ] PRESENTED BY: Mt;J.d -þ~ 'Michael Powley, P.E. County Engineer SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DEPT SUBJECT: Sunland Gardens M.S.B.U (Phase 1) Second Public Hearing Potable Water Improvements - FPUA BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAIL. (State type & No. of transaction or N/A): N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: March 12, 2002 - Board accepted the petition and granted permission to advertise the Initial Public Hearing. April 16, 2002 - Initial Public Hearing held. Board created MSBU and authorized County Engineer to proceed with project. December 9, 2003 - Board granted permission to advertise the Second Public Hearing RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 03-323 to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the Sunland Gardens Municipal Services Benefit Unit; approve the attached preliminary assessment roll; approve the expanded MSBU boundary; and authorize staff to proceed with construction of the project. , COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 J Doug sAnderson County Administrator [x]County Attorney [X}Pub/l'WO~ ~\\. [x]Fmance, ~ ., ;v Coordination/Sianatures [x ]Co. Eng MvP MMSBUCod) I~ [x]Mgt. & Budget 2æ.f} f119 [ ]Utilities: [ ]Purchasing '-" ....I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. ~ ~)...t.:i,'::;-'~.~~ :'~ .~.;. , c, DATE: January 6,2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING tx CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUN1Y COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Herman's Bay Beach Access - Exchange for Alternate Beach Access Property BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS A V AILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board determine if it wishes to exchange the proposed property and, if the Board authorizes the exchange of the proposed property I approve Resolution No. 04-26 as drafted and authorize the Chairman to sign the Resolution. County Attorney: Jy uglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals COMMISSION ACTION: NCE: [~APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 Management & Budget Prop. Acq. Mgr: Originating Dept. Com. Dev. Dir: Parks & Rec Dir: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff.5/96 '-" ....,I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 5C DATE: January 6,2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [x] Leg. [] Quasi-JD [x] CONSENT [ ] PRESENTED BY: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): County Attorney Daniel Mcintyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Petition for Abandonment Abandon a 30 f1. Platted Easement through the Northwest 1/4 of Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 39 East according to Plat Book 3, Page 30. Resolution NO.04-28 BACKGROUND: Please see attached Memorandum. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: December 9, 2003 - Request for Permission to Advertise Notice of Public Hearing RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Resolution No. 04-28, instruct staff to publish the final Notice of Abandonment, record Resolution No. 04-28, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Public Hearing, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Abandonment and the quit-claim deeds releasing rights to platted right-of-way in the Public Records of S1. Lucie County, Florida. COMMISSION ACTION: lX APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER Approved 5-0 Dou a Änderson County Administrator (n) Co""ty Attomey, Y (xx) Originating Dept.: ifto-«'- Review and Approvals (xx) Public W~rks:~ (:, ) Purchasing: (xx) County Engineer: (xx) Road & Bridge '-' ..., Agenda Request Item Number: MeetinQ Date: 5b Jan. 6, 2004 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ X ] [ [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 04-001, Amending the St. Lucie County Land Develo ent Code By Creating Section 10.01.10, Administrative Variances To Any Require Dimensional Requirement of this Code to Accomplish the Goals, Objectives and Po icies of the Comprehensive Plan and this Code To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development BACKGROUND: Draft Ordinance 04-001 proposes to create a new section in our Land Development Code whereby additional authority to grant administrative variances would be given to the Community Development Director when owing to special conditions, the literal enforcement of the dimensional provisions of this Code would impose a condition whereby greater harm to the existing natural environment would be caused than might otherwise be achieved through the granting of limited relief from any such minimum dimensional standard, subject to the standards and procedures set forth in this section. In short, these amendments allow the County to grant relief from our various setbacks when it can be demonstrated that doing so would provide for less environmental damage than if the rule in question were strictly applied. It is the belief of the County that by creating a process where flexibility can be applied, we will wind up with better projects and impacts on the natural system will be minimized. It needs to be noted that in establishing this process, the Community Development Director is required to receive comment and recommendations from the following other Departments before any final decision is rendered; Public Works Director, County Engineer, Building Official, Fire Marshal, Environmental Resource Manager and any other appropriate County or State official relevant to the review of the application at hand. The maximum administrative variance that may be granted is 50% of the minimum requirements. Anything requested that is greater than this must be reviewed by either the Board of Adjustment or the Board of County Commissioners, as may otherwise be required. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: On December 16, 2003, the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency for St. Lucie County held a public hearing on this matter. At the conclusion of that hearing, the Board voted to recommend that the County Commission not approve Draft Ordinance 04-001 as drafted. The concems cited by the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency were that they did not feel it was appropriate to empower such level of relief with staff. Several members of the P&ZlLPA Board felt that the Board of Adjustment was sufficiently up to the task of addressing any requested variance from the County's Land ----- Development Code to meet the same goals as cited on this Ordinance or, that an elected body, such as the Board of County Commissioners, was the more appropriate body to hear any requested variances from these codes. No action is required from the County Commission at this time. This is the first of two required public hearings on this matter. The second public hearing on this matter will be held on Tuesday January 20, 2004, at 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. [X] APPROVED c=J OTHER D DENIED Approved 5-0 to continue to January 20,2004 ENCE: COMMISSION ACTION: K Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: (agend760a) ~ ...., Agenda Request Item Number: MeetinR Date: bC Jan. 6, 2004 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ X] [ [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ ,~" SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 04-002, amending the St. Lucie County Land Devel pment Code by amending section 7.10.13 Sewage and Septage Treatment Facilities in Agricultural Zoning Districts to provide for municipal annexation of a facility site. To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 04-002, which proposes to amend the County's current regulations that address Sewage and Septage Treatment facilities in agricultural zoning districts. In sum, these regulations do not prevent a municipal authority from annexation land and proceeding with the development of a sewage or septage treatment facility on that land where the land will retain the County's agricultural zoning designation, until the zoning and land use have been changed in accord with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, by the annexing municipality. These regulations simply require that the County be included as a consenting partner in the application of the conditional use permit. The reasoning behind this recommend change is that in order to avoid unnecessary multi-jurisdictional conflicts that can rise out of inadequate communication between two separate political entities, where one side can be played off against the other, consensus agreement to the appropriateness of the location and addressing of any site development impacts would be required. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A On December 16, 2003, the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency for SI. Lucie County held a public hearing on this matter. At the conclusion of that hearing, the Board voted to recommend that the County Commission not approve Draft Ordinance 04-001 as drafted. The concerns cited by the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency were that they did not feel that amendment was necessary to address the concerns raised by the recent City of Port S1. Lucie actions towards the development of a regional wastewater treatment facility. Further, it was the opinion of some members of the P&ZlLPA, that County's should not be engaged in the provision of services such as water and sewer services that traditionally, at least in Florida, have been provided by municipalities. RECOMMENDATION: No action is required from the County Commission at this time. This is the first of two required public hearings on this matter. The second public hearing on this matter will be held on Tuesday January 20, 2004, at 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. URRENCE: COMMISSION ACTION: LX] APPROVED [:=J OTHER D DENIED Approved 5-0 to continue to January 20,2004 D uglas M. Anderson ounty Administrator ;~ Coordination/ Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: (agend761a) '-' ...., Agenda Request Item Number: MeetinQ Date: !)F Jan 6, 2004 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ X ] [ [ ] [X ] Quasi-JD [ BACKGROUND: Consider draft of the Stipulated Settlement Agreement between St. Lucie ounty and the Florida Department of Community Affairs in regard to the outstanding I sues of non- compliance with the adopted St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan Amendments (refer to DOAH Case No. 02-2535GM; Docket Number 02-1 ER-N01-5601-(A)-(N». Attached is a copy of the final draft of the Stipulated Settlement Agreement between St. Lucie County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs in regard to the outstanding issues of non-compliance with the adopted St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan Amendments (refer to DOAH Case No. 02-2535GM; Docket Number 02-1 ER-N01-5601-(A)-(N). On March 5, 2002, this Board approved Ordinance 02-008 making several amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan. In June of 2002, the Department of Community Affairs made a finding that the adopted amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan were "Not in Compliance" with the requirements of Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-6, Florida Administrative Code. Over the next several months DCA and County staff worked on developing a series of remedial amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan that address the issues cited in the DCA's notice of non-compliance. In late Summer 2003, County and DCA staff completed negotiations on this matter. The results of these negotiations are found in the attached documents. These are the same draft amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan that staff had provided to the Board for review over the summer. ent Director To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development SUBJECT: On December 9, 2003, the St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency held a public meeting to review the proposed Stipulated Settlement Agreement. At the conclusion of that meeting, and by unanimous agreement of the members present, the LPA recommended that the Board approve the stipulated settlement agreement, subject to several minor points of clarification. Those points include amending Policy 8.1.4.14 to provide for some form of mitigation relief if the wetland altered had little functional value; clarification to Policy 8.1.6.3 to include both the North and South Savannas as an area where off-road vehicles would be prohibited; and clarification to Policy 8.1.14.1 to provide for some relief for smaller parcel that may be impacted by inclusion as one of the cited wetland types. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: N/A N/A Staff recommends that the Board approve the Stipulated Settlement Agreement between St. Lucie County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs in regard to the outstanding issues of non-compliance with the adopted St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and further that the Board approve Draft Ordinance 04-004 which would approve the remedial amendments to the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. [](] APPROVED CJ OTHER D DENIED Approved 5-0 RENCE: COMMISSION ACTION: uglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: ~/ Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing:, Other: (agend762a) \.,.- .....I Agenda Request Item Number: MeetinQ Date: 0fJr Jan. 6, 2004 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [ x ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development .".- - BACKGROUND: Ft. Pierce Annexations K-256 and K-257 no Consider Initiating Conflict Resolutio proceedings pursuant to Chapter 164, Florida Statutes Attached are copies of recent advertisement announcing the intent of the City of Ft. Pierce to annex certain lands in the County into the City. The first of these hearings is set for January 5, 2004. The second, and final, hearing on these annexations will take place on Tuesday, January 20, 2004. SUBJECT: As the Board is aware the City and the County are currently involved in litigation over the method of annexation that the City of Fort Pierce is utilizing in expanding their territorial limits. The fundamental issue in the County's complaint with the City is that they are not adhering to the annexation standards described in Chapter 171, Florida Statutes. The City's position, in sum, is that they do not have to adhere to these standards when the annexations are being done voluntarily through the execution of utility service agreements. As of this date, no hearing dates have been set for the Courts to review this complaint. In reviewing these proposed annexations, it is Staff's opinion that Annexation Ordinance K-257 is not consistent with the requirements of Chapter 171 Florida Statutes, and therefore should not be allowed to proceed until compliance with these requirements can be demonstrated. Specifically, the action in question is that, Annexation Ordinance K-257 serves to further the creation of a pocket of unincorporated area along the south market avenue corridor. The County is aware of no immediate plans of the City that would provide for the elimination of this "pocket". It is further the belief of the County, that if allowed to continue, the likelihood is high that the City will create another area of "enclave" through the annexation of other properties fronting along Oleander avenue to the south of the subject site. The creation of enclaves is expressly prohibited in Chapter 171, Florida Statutes, however that has in the past not prevented the City from annexing lands through the "voluntary annexation process' that have resulted in the establishment of enclaves of unincorporated areas of the County. FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RËCOMMENDATION: Annexation Ordinance K-256 is also a potentially objectionable annexation, not so much for the particular annexation itself, but for the fact that the "pocket" that this annexation is serving to help fill-in was created improperly through the adjoining lands. N/A N/A Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to sign a resolution initiating the Conflict Resolution Process with the City of Ft. Pierce in regard to proposed Annexation Ordinance K-257 and further that staff be authorized to appear at the City Commission meeting of January 20, 2004 to express our concerns on this matter. Staff further request that authorization be given to formally request that the County be a full review and comment agency for any development proposal that may be filed on the properties associated with City of Ft. Pierce annexation Ordinance K-256. RRENCE: COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED D DENIED C:=J OTHER Approved 4-1 (Comm. Hutchinson No) -- ouglas M. Anderson County Administrator Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: ()} (agend759a) ~ .....I Agenda Request Item Number: (ìA Meetinq Date: Jan 6, 2004 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [ X ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ BACKGROUND: Consider staff comments to the City of Port S1. Luci regional wastewater treatment facility (McCarty Roa On Monday, January 12, 2004, the City Council for the City of Port S1. Lucie will be holding a public hearing for the purpose of conducting the equivalent of the County Commissions Final Public Hearing under our (the County's) Conditional Use review procedures as set forth in Section 11.07.00 of the S1. Lucie County Land Development Code. The purpose of this Conditional Use Public Hearing is for the City to consider authorizing the development of a 6 million gallon per day, regional wastewater treatment plant on property located at the south end of McCarty Road. This application for Conditional Use was filed for, by, and with the City of Port S1. Lucie on December 12, 2003, and is being processed by the City pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 171.062(2) Florida Statutes, which read as follows: irector To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development SUBJECT: 171.062 Effects of ennexatlons or contractlons.- (2) " the area annexed was subject to a county land use plan and county zoning or subdivision regulations, these regulations remain in lulllorce and eHect until the municipality adopts a comprehensive plan amendment that includes the annexed area. Since as part of the recent annexation of the parent parcel on which this wastewater treatment plant will be located, the City elected not to change the Future Land Use or Zoning designations of the parcel, they are proceeding with the development review of this new facility in accord with the provisions of Section 7.10.13 of the County's Land Development Code. Attached is a copy of the application material that the County requested from the City in regard to this Conditional Use petition. We received this petition on December 29,2003. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: N/A N/A At this point the Board has essentially two options. Option one, is to submit comments to the City of Port S1. Lucie that based upon our review of the information obtained from the City, the application for Conditional Use Permit as currently submitted is incomplete/deficient, and if it were to be reviewed by the County, final action on it would likely have to be delayed until the cited deficiencies were corrected. Option two is that assuming that the City can address the above cited deficiencies prior to the final review of this application on January 12, 2004, and further assuming that the City has adhered to all of the County's minimum notice standards in the review and processing of this Conditional Use application, staff recommends that the Board considered forwarding the attached special conditions to the City for review and consideration in any final approval orders for the Conditional Use! Site Plan for this facility. RENCE: COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED r:=J OTHER D DENIED Approved 5-0 Option Two - ouglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing; Other: (agend764) AGENDA REQUEST ...¡ ITEM NO.1 '-"' Date: January 6, 2004 Regular [X ] Public Hearing [ ] Consent [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIOr..TERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney '- Heather Young Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 03-19 - Animal Noise in AR-l Zoning Districts BACKGROUND: See C.A. No. 03-1895 FUNDS A V AIL. (State type & No. of transaction or N/A): N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests further direction from the Board with regard to Ordinance No. 03-19. I)CJ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Withdrawn E: COMMISSION ACTION: Dougla . Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: ~/ Coo rdina tion/Si2na tu res Mgt. &.B'dg.~ ~ Othèi-: . . P,~h~i"g' ~ .~~~~ßlt1;;~> . > o'ffìéf~~c .J;- ~ Originating Dept.: Finance (Check for Copy only, if applicable): rr,'·':::- -r--- II \ ~ 0 p n n --- ; .¡F, !. L~ [l'C I ~ I,: ',7 f? I-·-'\! I' u :.r--'~ êJ L ~i I,". I I .; ¡ --------c2.., j ill , n ! > I Ii I ¡ I Ii ¡: - ~ : i ii I I"' ,-< D.EG 311, 2nO<' iI.! / I I.J 'j . I ) L-- I-~ l --.----~ Cl. ADf/::;'''. Oi-FIr:E ' ----_... ~ I '-'" t.""l AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. C-2 DATE: January 6, 2004 REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ 1 CONSENT [ X 1 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: PUBLIC SAFETY PRESENTED BY: Jack Southard SUBJECT: Resolution 04-001 approving Emergency Management Services (EMS) Grant from the State of Florida Health Department. BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County Fire Dept. has filled out an application for the annual EMS Grant offered by the Bureau of Emergency Management at the State of Florida Department of Health. We anticipate to receive up to $136,901 in the Fiscal year 2003 - 2004. Section 4 of the application calls for a resolution from the Board of County Commissioners certifying the monies from the EMS County Grant will improve and expand the county's pre-hospital EMS system and that the grant monies will not be used to supplant existing county EMS budget allocations. FUNDS WILL BE A V All..ABLE: N/ A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Resolution 04-001, and authorize the Chairman to sign the application. 'COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: IX] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 ~. Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: ~¿ Mmagcment & Bndgct: xxC,' :C1~"'ChaSing, Originating Dcpt: Public Wade" Other, XX - ~ Fire ~. Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX .....' ~ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. c-3 A DATE: Jan. 6. 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT[x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: DON MCLAM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CENTRAL SERVICES SUBJECT: BID WAIVER AND SOLE SOURCE DECLARATION TO SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR CENTRAL SERVICES AlC DEPARTMENT! ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPGRADE TO APOGEE SYSTEMS BACKGROUND: The AlC Division of Central Services has utilized the System 600 Energy Management System, since early 1990's, through Siemens Building Technologies for temperature control in nine county facilities; a final revision on this system was made on this product in 1999. Now with the development of the APOGEE System and non-orderable and unavailability of the component parts for the System 600 (currently in use) this product will be retired and replaced by APOGEE. Siemens designs, develops and manufactures the APOGEE System; APOGEE is only sold and supported through factory-owned offices of Siemens Building Technologies. (PLEASE SEE ATTACHED LETTER) Siemens has served St. Lucie County with the System 600 Energy Management System for over ten years and staff feels it would benefit St. Lucie County to continue our partnership with them on implementation of the APOGEE System at a cost of $40,000.00. FUNDS AVAIL: 001-1929-564000-100 (Machinery & Equipment) PREVIOUS ACTION: Board approved Equipment Request #EQ04-039. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the bid waiver and sole source declaration to Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. for the APOGEE Energy Management Systems Upgrade at a cost of $40,000.00. MISSION ACTION: be) APPROVED [] DENIED r1 OTHER: Approved 5-0 NCE: ~ County Attorney: Originating Dept: --p M.. ~ vMgt. & Budget. Do nderson County Administrator vPurchaSing Mgr.:' d /' Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eft. 1/97 H:\AGENDA\AGENDA-AC APOGEE.DOC ........ ,.....I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 3-b DATE: Jan. 6.2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT[x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: DON MCLAM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CENTRAL SERVICES SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER NO.3 TO CONTRACT NO. C01-09-590 TECO ENERGY SERVICES: AMEND SCOPE OF WORK FOR ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX TO OMIT INSTALLATION OF ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES CONTROLS FOR ROOF TOP AlC UNITS SERVING THE CIVIC AUDITORIUM. BACKGROUND: Through Board approval St. Lucie County entered into contract with TECO Energy Services on September 25,2001 for retrofit installation of energy efficiency equipment. With the elimination of energy efficient equipment supporting the Civic Center, scope of work scheduled by TECO for this location was changed bringing about a decrease in the contract sum in the amount of $32,396.00, please see attached ESCO SCOPE OF WORK CHANGE NOTICE. FUNDS AVAIL: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners approved Amendment to Contract No. C01- 09-590 on May 14, 2002, Item No. C-10. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Change Order No.3 to Contract No. C01-09-590 with TECO Energy Systems to reduce the contract sum by $32,396.00 and authorization for the Chairman to sign the Change Order. , MISSION ACTION: [~APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 ENCE: County Attorney: -p¡- Originating Dep;: --r::::>C'v1 \\,{~ , Mgt. & Budget: D 9 Anderson County Administrator //purchaSing Mgr.: GI P Coordination/Signatures Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eft. 1/97 H:\AGENDA\AGENDA REQUEST FORM.WPD '--' ......, AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO: C-4 DATE: Jan 6, 2004 REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT X] TO: SAINT LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks and Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh SUBJECT: ~RELEASE OF RETAINAGE TO JIM WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION INC & FINAL PAYMENT BACKGROUND: On 21 January 2003, the Board approved the construction of the Fairgrounds maintenance building by Jim wright Construction Inc. Final inspection of the building (permit# 23040680) was approved on November 26, 2003. Staff is requesting approval to make the final payment in the amount of $8,296 to Jim wright Construction, Inc. PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board awarded bid #03-012 in the amount of $82,960 to Jim wright Construction, Inc. FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN: 310002-000-205100-7655 (General Ledger - Retainage) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval to make the final payment and release the retainage of $8,296 to Jim Wright Construction Inc. x] ] APPROVED OTHER: [ ] Approved 5-0 DENIED ÇOMMISSION ACTION: Coordination/Signatures County Attorney' ~ Management & Budget, Purchasing, originating Dept: " Other: Finance:¡-&~ (if applicable) ðf< m ,//- .......\ ,,-.r,'" ~ C"' "" (\", rlf. '" 1:" Inr:Df"'\I''-fnC' f"'Ir.'T" I"~ A r:r. nnr' '-' ......; Agenda Request Item Number: Meetina Date: 5 Jan 6, 2004 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ) [X ] [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development SUBJECT: Request of St. Andrews Park Inc., the developers of the St. Andrews Park ixed use commerciaVresidential development in the City of Port St. Lucie, for a Road Impact Fee Credit Agreement associated with the construction of Selvitz Road from Peachtree Boulevard to Parkway Elementary School. BACKGROUND: The developers of the St. Andrews Park mixed use commercial/residential development in Port St. Lucie are requesting that the County consider granting them a Road Impact Fee Credit for the value of the cost to construct the "missing" segment of Selvitz Road in the City of Port St. Lucie from Peachtree Boulevard to Parkway Elementary School. The requirement for the construction of this roadway segment was imposed by the City of Port St. Lucie as part of the basic development plan approvals for the St. Andrews Park project. Section 1-17-33.1 of the St. Lucie County Code and Complied Laws provides for a process whereby the County may consider the granting of Road Impact Fee Credits for work the meet certain minimum standards. Specifically, in the case of Selvitz Road, the "missing" segment is recognized as part of the overall transportation and circulation needs for the community and is considered to be a part of the Impact Fee Eligibility Network, thus a Road Impact Fee Credit may be considered on this property. Attached are copies of the submitted costs for the construction of this project. County staff has reviewed these submitted figures and determined that they appear to be within accepted standards and has no objection or concern over the figures submitted. Copies of this information have been submitted to the City of Port St. Lucie for verification, and the City has concurred with methodology used. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: N/A N/A Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners enter into a Road Impact Fee Credit Agreement with St. Andrews Park, Inc., the developers of the St. Andrews Park residential development, for the costs associated with the construction of Selvitz Road from Peachtree Boulevard to Parkway Elementary School and that discounting for the impacts of this development on this roadway segment the credit amount be established at at $1,117,416 (or 87.9% of the overall cost of $1,271,236). The impact fee credits granted by this action would be applicable only to the St. Andrews Park mixed use commercial/residential development, and are not assignable to any other impact fee category or classification. COMMISSION ACTION: c!J APPROVED CJ OTHER D DENIED Approved 5-0 ouglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: (agend763) '--' Agenda Request Item ~ber (G~ Date: 01/06/04 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ X ] [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ To: Subm ¡tted By: Board of County Commissioners Public Works SUBJECT: Request of Atlantic Truss Company for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A}(5), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the project to be known as Atlantic Truss Company - Major Site Plan. BACKGROUND: The developer of Atlantic Truss Company to be located on 13.06 acres of land on the east side of King's Highway, is requesting that the Board grant relief from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 11.02.09(A}(5}(a) requires that all site plans ten acres or greater in size, include as a part of the site plan review process, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The purpose of the EIR is to assess the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environmental conditions. The Board of County Commissioners may grant relief from the requirements for the filing of this report upon the demonstration by the developer that the information being foregone by such relief is not needed in order to determine the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural en vi ronm ent. The proposed Atlantic Truss Company is located on previously cleared citrus groves. There are no significant environmental features on the subject property. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this request for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A}(5) be approved and that no environmental impact report be required fOl\this project. .-Yl COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED c=J DENIED c=J OTHER Approved 5-0 CURRENCE: Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: LJY' 'µ-uP) ßp' , I' Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: ~ Other: (~ \he\l)~M) \.....- .....,¡ ITEM NO. C-6B DATE: January 6, 2004 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): ENGINEERING DIVISION (4115) Michael V. Powley, P. County Engineer SUBJECT: Equipment Purchase _ Budget Amendment 04-119. Request permission to upgrade the AutoCad software for our Division and purchase a printer for the MSBU program. BACKGROUND: Savings in the equipment account in the amount of $4,764 from the purchase of two pickup trucks and the Engineering shared printer will be used for the purchase of the AutoCad software and the MSBU printer. The requested funds in the amount of $1,510 will be transferred from the Office Supply-Computer account to accommodate the requested purchase of the land Desktop Upgrade. FUNDS AVAilABLE: AutoCad Software Upgrades (Qty. 4)- $3,184 - EQ04-225 land Desktop Upgrade (Qty 1) $1,116- EQ04-226 Printer for the MSBU Section (Qty. 1)- $1,510 - EQ04-227 Funds are available in the Engineering Division's Operating Account - Equipment 101-4115-564000-400, and funds will be made available in the Engineering Division's Operating Account- Software 101-4115-568000-400. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Budget Amendment 04-119 to transf r funds into proper expenditure accounts. COMMISSION ACTION: ()C¡ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER Approved 5-0 [x] County Attorney [ ] Project. Manager y [x] Mgt. & Budget ( [x] Budget & Rev. Coor. [x] ERD f.tA ['I 0';';00"0' Dept. P'(]}?J ~ [x] Purchasing Dept. [ ] Road & Bridge (Check for copy only, if applicable) -- ....-.--. --........--¡ ,-~ p (ê', rs í, \'1 R.~ :\ -, I' ,\ r '\ \~ \,I,,!~S U\~.I \~) ¡ ~ 'i . ' _._:;:_:~~..____._........---t ¡ 1 i 1\ ,,¡:: I . i i i \' DEC 2 6_~O::__J!:J 1____------ I cc. p!O"..o-; C¡:FICE _.J ~.- -....-----~._._'-,.- '-" .....J ITEM NO. C- 6c DATE: January 6,2004 , AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): ENGINEERING DIVISION (4115) Michael V. Powley, P.E. County Engineer SUBJECT: Approve Change Order No.1 in the amount of $64,302.46 for modification to the Midway Road and Glades Cut-Off Road Intersection Improvements and Midway I Glades Cut-Off Road Utilities Extension - Phase 1A projects. Construction of the projects is presently underway. In order to facilitate construction activities some modification to the plans were made (see attached memorandum from American Consulting Engineers). In addition to the modifications outlined on the memorandum, a directional bore in lieu of an open cut utility installation is proposed across Midway Road. These modifications will facilitate construction, alleviate some delays to the traveling public, and reduce the contract time by 5 days. BACKGROUND: On June 6, 2003 bids were opened for the Midway Road and Glades Cut-Off Road Intersection Improvements and Midway I Glades Cut-Off Road Utilities Extension - Phase 1 A. One Thousand and Ninety companies were notified, 42 sets of bid documents were distributed and four (4) bids were received. The low bidder was Community Asphalt Corp. in the amount of $5,028,653.61. All work will be coordinated and inspected by American Consulting Engineers. FUNDS AVAILABLE: ROADWAY PORTION: Funds will be made available in 315-4115-563000-410045 County Building Fund, Engineering - Public Works in the amount of $51 ,095. UTILITY PORTION: . Funds are available in 315-3600-563000-36214 County Building Fund - Water Sewer Service in the amount of $13,208. PREVIOUS ACTION: On June 24, 2003, the Board approved award of the contract to Community Asphalt Corp. in the amount of $5,028,653.61. RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends the Board approve and authorize the Chairman to sign Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $64,302.46 for a total contract price of $5,092,956.07 to Community Asphalt Corp. for modific . n to the plans. COMMISSION ACTION: [)( APPROVED[ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER Approved 5-0 .J [x] County Attorney ~. [x] Project. Manager 4. cA 1-\ [x] Road & Bridg3 fi; ~. \.., ~ ITEM NO. C6d DATE: 1/6/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: ( X ) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS - ROAD DEPT. SUBJECT: Conditional Acceptance of Prima Vista Blvd. Extension BACKGROUND: As part of the approval for the construction of the Pine Lakes Apartments (FKA Pine Summit Apartments), the applicant was required to extend Prima Vista Blvd. to the east from the entrance to the shopping center east to--\he entrance to the apartments. At this time, the construction is complete and the applicant is requesting Conditional Acceptance of the improvements by the County. The County Engineer has inspected the improvements and at this time is recommending conditional acceptance by the Board for the extension of Prima Vista Blvd. Due to the inability by the Contractor for this construction to coordinate with the testing firm retained by the County, the maintenance agreement will be for a period of three (3) years and expire on January 6th,2007. FUNDS AVAILABLE: NIA PREVIOUS ACTION: NIA RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board conditionally accept the extension of Prima Vista Blvd. and Authorize the Chair to sign the attached Maintenance Agreement. COMMISSION ACTION: o gl Anderson County Administrator X APPROVED DENIED OTHER: Approved (5-0) Review and Approvals . Originating Dep" (Pub. WkS}~ . County Attorney. _ " .& · Management and Budge" ¥tW:j- Danv~mental Lands: o Finance: 181 Other Community Development --- , ---..... Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. ' ~ ....,I !~..;5:t'.~.,-i :.,::::-.._/~,~..< ~:1"~ ~ ~,,: ~-,~ \ ( AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO.7 DATE: January 6, 2004 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [X] TO: Board of County Commissioners '\. herson, County Administrator SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Administration SUBJECT: Board of Adjustment Appointment BACKGROUND: Commissioner Lewis has requested that Mr. Buddy Emerson serve as her appointee on the Board of Adjustment. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/ A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board ratify Commissioner Lewis's appointment of Mr. Buddy Emerson to the Board of Adjustment. COMMISSION ACTION: ~PPROVED [] DENIED [] OTHER: Approved 5-0 Review and Approvals County Attorney: _ Management & Budget: _ Originating Dept: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Purchasing: Other: Effective: 5/96 ~ ....." ITEM NO. C - 8A DATE: 1/6/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED'BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Bid #04-008, Golf Ball Retrieval Services. BACKGROUND: On December 15, 2003, Bid #04-008 was opened for Golf Ball Retrieval Services. Three hundred and twenty-eight (328) vendors were notified, one (1) bid document was distributed and one (1) response was received. Staff recommends award to Birdie Golf Ball Co. who will provide 6000 high quality rewashed golf balls at no charge. Any additional balls may be purchased at $.30 a piece. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid #04-008 Golf Ball Retrieval Services to Birdie Golf Ball Co., and authorization for the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. (X) APPROVED () DENIED ( ) OTHER Approved 5-0 E: COMMISSION ACTION: D ANDERSON COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Coord i nati on/Signatures County Attorney ( X ) ~.. Mgt. & Budget ( ) Other ( ) Purchasing (X) af Originating Dept. ( ) Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable)-,--- '-' ....." ITEM NO. C- 8B DATE: 1/6/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED"BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker. Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Permission to advertise Invitation for Bid for Dollman Park Riverside (West) Parking Lot. BACKGROUND: To solicit bids from firms to construct a parking lot at Dollman Park Riverside (West). FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for the request for permission to advertise Invitation for Bid for Dollman Park Riverside (West) Parking Lot. COMMISSION ACTION: (X) APPROVED () DENIED ( ) OTHER Approved 5-0 E: - :A.NDERSON TY ADMINISTRATOR Coord ination/Sia natures County Attorney ( X) 7/ Mgt. & Budget ( ) Other ( ) Purchasing (X) &f Originating Dept. ( ) Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable)_ ~ ..."", ITEM NO. C - BC DATE: 1/6/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Second Extension to Contract No. C01-01-266 with Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley, Architects and Associates, P.A. BACKGROUND: On January 9, 2001 the Board of County Commissioners approved a two-year contract through January 9, 2003 with Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley, Architects and Associates, P.A. to provide continuing professional architectural services. The contract allows for two (2) additional one- year extensions at the same terms and conditions. Staff is now recommending that the Board authorize the second extension. FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: On January 14, 2003 the Board of County Commissioners approved the first extension. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the second extension to the contract with Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley, Architects a nd Associates, P.A. a nd a uthorization for the Chairman to sign the extension as prepared by the County Attorney. ( X APPROVED ( ,) OTHER ( ) DENIED Approved 5-0 COMMISSION ACTION: DOUG NDERSON COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Coordi nation/SiQnatures County Attorney ( X) Originating Dept. ( ) )r Mgt. & Budget ( ) Other ( ) Purchasing (X) dll Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable)_ '-' ....,I ITEM NO. C- 8D DATE: 1/6/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker. Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Second Extension to Contract No. C01-01-292 with REG Architects, Inc. BACKGROUND: On January 9, 2001 the Board of County Commissioners approved a two-year contract through January 9, 2003 with REG Architects, Inc to provide continuing professional architectural services. The contract allows for two (2) additional one-year extensions at the same terms and conditions. Staff is now recommending that the Board authorize the second extension. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: On January 14, 2003 the Board of County Commissioners approved the first extension. I RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the second extension to the contract with REG Architects, Inc and authorization for t he Chairman to sign t he extension as prepared by the County Attorney. ., (~APPROVED () DENIED ( ) OTHER Approved 5-0 E: COMMISSION ACTION: DO ANDERSON COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Coordi nation/Siç¡natures County Attorney (X) Jr.. Mgt. & Budget ( } Other ( ) Purchasing (X) P r Originating Dept. ( ) Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable)_ ....., ....I ITEM NO. C- BE DATE: 1/6/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED13Y: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Bid Waiver and sole source vendor contract with JWC Environmental for the purchase of an Auger Monster and parts. BACKGROUND: JWC Environmental is the sole provider, manufacturer and service for the Auger Monster, and it's spare parts. The Central Services Department requests permission to declare JWC Environmental a sole source vendor for the purchase of the Auger monster and parts. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Account #316-1940-5'2000-1527' County Capital Fund/Building/Rock Road Jail Improvements. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request for bid waiver and declare JWC Environmental a sole vendor for the Auger Monster and parts. (X) APPROVED ( ) OTHER ( ) DENIED Approved 5-0 C0MMISSION ACTION: D U ANDERSON COlJNTY ADMINISTRATOR Coordi nation/Sianatures County Attorney (X) ~<Y Mgt. & Budget (X) tf¡[) -1nrrbj Other ( ) Purchasing (X) or Originating Dept. ( ) Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable)_ '-" ~ ITEM NO. C - 8F DATE: 1/6/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTE[Y BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Bid #04-013, Purchase of One (1) Vibratory Soil Compactor with Smooth Drum. BACKGROUND: On December 8,2003, Bid #04-013 was opened for Purchase of One (1) Vibratory Soil Compactor with Smooth Drum. One hundred and ninety-six (196) vendors were notified, twenty- two (22) bid documents were distributed qnd ten (10) responses were received. Staff recommends award to the third lowest bidder Nortax Equipment Co which submitted the lowest responsive and responsible bid meeting specifications for total amount of $72,344.44 and approval of the budgeted amount for Equipment Request #EQ04-160. (See attached) The additional funds are available from savings on previously purchased equipment this year. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Account #101-4108-564000-400 . Transportation Trust, Road & Bridge Drainage. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid#04-013 - Purchase of One (1) Vibratory Soil Compactor with Smooth Drum to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Nortax Equipment Cp. for total amount of $72,344.44, and approval of the budgeted amount for Equipment Request #EQ04-160. (~ APPROVED ( ) OTHER ( ) DENIED Approved 5-0 NDERSON TY ADMINISTRATOR COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney ( X ) Originating Dept. ( ) ,J(' Mgt. & Budget ( Other ( ) Purchasing (X) ê-lf Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable)_ '--' ....." AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. -ill DATE: January 6, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 04-31 _ Authorizing and empowering St. Lucie County to establish an account with Morgan Stanley as described in the Morgan Stanley corporate Account Agreement; in order to construct an Equestrian Center to be located at the St. Lucie County Fairgrounds; and that Adams Ranch, Ltd. Will donate to the County $350,000.00 payable over 15 years in lawful money ofthe United States. BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County is proposing to construct an Equestrian Center to be located at the St. Lucie County Fairgrounds and has solicited donations from private parties to help fund construction of the Center. The construction of the Equestrian Center will serve a public purpose and will benefit the citizens of St. Lucie County. Adams Ranch, Ltd. Has agreed to donate $350,000.00 payable over 15 years in the form oflawful money ofthe United States of America. This Board desires to accept the pledge by Adams Ranch, Ltd. The attached Resolution No. 04-31 has been drafted for that purpose. FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 04-31 as drafted. '-", COMMISSION ACTION: CONCU ......" E: [ X APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 County Attorney: r· .. ìJJ:/ Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Chec~ for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 \..- ~ AGENDA REOUEST qß ITEM NO. DATE: January 6, 2004 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD-OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre . County Attorney SUBJECT:' Resolution No. 04-29 - Urging Governor Jeb Bush and the Florida Legislature to Pass HB 1117 and SB 2062, known as the Infant Eye Care Bill and nicknamed "Joey's Bill", in order to detect and treat Retinoblastoma. BACKGROUND: Retinoblastoma is a very rare disease that affects children, causing the growth of malignant tumors in the retinal cell layer of the eye. Ninety percent of the cases occur in the first five years of life. This Board supports eye pathology screening at birth and all well-baby exams to ensure that everything is being done to detect ocular diseases in newborns, infants and toddlers. FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 04-29 as drafted, and have the County Administrator forward a copy of this Resolution to Governor Bush and the Florida Legislature. [ X APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 CE: COMMISSION ACTION: Do sAnderson County Administrator '-- r¡j)( Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Originating Dept. Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ >...,/ Purchasing Other: Eff. 5/96 Ii") '--' .....I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 1Q DATE: Jan. 6. 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT[x] INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE TO: BOARD~OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: DON MCLAM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CENTRAL SERVICES SUBJECT: CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER #1 TO CONTRACT #C03-06-452 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION I BARTH CONSTRUCTION, INC. BACKGROUND: On June 11th, 2003 bids were opened for the construction of the Administration Building Addition. The Board of County Commissioners approved award of Bid #03-058 to the lowest bidder, Barth Construction and St. Lucie County entered into contract with Barth Construction on June 24th, 2003 and ~ent out a Notice to Proceed dated November 10th, 2003. However, because of major permitting delays, due to circumstances beyond the control of the contractor, project commencement has been postponed and the time of performance as outlined in the contract will need to be extended 39 days with a completion date of November 12th, 2004, thereby providing ample time for the contractor to complete this project. FUNDS AVAIL: 316-1930-562000-16008 (Buildings) PREVIOUS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners approved award of bid to Barth Construction on June 24th, 2003, item no. c 6-b. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve Contract Ch.ange Order #1 to Contract #C03-06-452, Barth Construction, to extend contract time for a completion date of November 12th, 2004 for the Administration Building Addition, and authorize the chairman to sign the prepared Change Order. MISSION ACTION: ()Cj APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 CE: ÆOllnty Attorney: ~f){/ Originating Dep~~ Finance: (Check for Copy only. if Applicable) Do Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & Budget: '~urchaSing Mgr.: ¿I,t Other: Other: Eft. 1/97 H:\AGENDA\AGENDA-BARTH EXTENSION.DOC J .,') · '-' ....,¡/ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. c-10b DATE: Jan. 6.2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT[x] INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: DON MCLAM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CENTRAL SERVICES SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER NO.1 TO CONTRACT NO. C03-05-492 PAUL JACQUIN & SONS, INC. FOR THE WALTON ROAD ANNEX BACKGROUND: Staff and REG Architects, Inc. have been meeting and working with Paul Jacquin & Sons on changes/modifications to the plans and design for the Walton Road Annex project. The staff's acceptable changes can be seen in Exhibit "A" of Change Order No.1. Some of the larger items are: 1) Permitting-County agreed to reimburse actual cost 2) Outlookers-change from cypress to foam 3) Sidewalk-replacing damaged north sidewalk 4) Dwarf Holly-miscount 5) Time Change-a notice to proceed was issued, permit was not received in a reasonable amount of time warranting a 78-day change in the contract FUNDS AVAIL: 316-1930-562000-1605 (buildings) PREVIOUS ACTION Board of County Commissioners approved award of contract on May 6,2003 to Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. RE,COMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Change Order No.1 to Contract No. C03-05-492 with Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. to increase the contract sum by $80,841.54 and extend the completion date to December 2,2004 authorizing the chairman to sign the prepared Change Order. MISSION ACTION: [)Q APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 CE: Dou derson Co nty Administrator Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: Originating ~~~v. \U".Ç> Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing Mgr.: ' - Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eff. 1/97 H:\AGENDA\AGENDA REQUEST FORM.WPD J "'-.. " '-' "*' AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO: c-. If DATE: January 6, 2004 Regular[ ] Public Hearing [ ] Consent [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: John Franklin, Housing Manager Via Beth Ryder, Director SUBMITTED BY: Community Services Division SUBJECT: Permission to advertise four separate RFP's for the FFY 2004 Community Development Block Grant Application. BACKGROUND: In order to submit a grant application under the Florida Department of Community AtTairs (DCA) for a Small Cities Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program which includes funding under three different categories; Neighborhood Revitalization, Housing Rehabilitation, and Commercial Revitalization it is necessary to advertise for requests for proposal for Grant Writing/Planning and Grant Administration for each ofthe categories as listed. See attached Memo # 04-34. FUNDS AVAIL: From grant funds when and if the grant is awarded to St. Lucie County PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board approved Craig A Smith and Associates for the Planning and Writing of the FFY 1998 CDBG application. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board grant permission to advertise 4 (four)RFP's for FFY 2004 Neighborhood Revitalization, Housing Rehabilitation and Economic Development Community De~elopment Block Grant applications. [~APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER Approved 5-0 COMMISSION ACTION: ~tounty Attorney: x wi Management & Budget x Purchasing: x q-d Originating Department: x Other: Other: Finance: x Check for copy only, if applicable --- AGENDA REQUEST IT....l NO. 6 DATE: January 13, 2004 .. REGULAR [ R] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh Director SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 03-37-Amending Section 1-15. Article II (Parks & Recreation) of the Code of Ordinances and Compiles laws by providing for Twenty-four Hour Access to all Beaches and Parks. BACKGROUND: As directed by the BOCC, staff requested the Recreation Advisory Board (RAB) to make a recommendation as to the amendment of Ordinance No. 03-37-Amending Section 1- 15, Article II (Parks & Recreation) of the Code of Ordinances and Compiled laws by providing for Twenty-four Hour Access to all Beaches and Parks. Staff met with the RAB on October 20th at which time county staff was requested to provide additional information at the November meeting. Staff met with the RAB on November 19th, provided the additional information requested and Meghan Conti, Environmental Specialist for the Bureau of Protected Species Management, gave a power point presentation. Upon review of all information, the RAB members made the unanimous recommendation not to allow 24 hour beach access to any beaches or parks due to liability, law enforcement, vandalism, and environmental issues. In August 2003, staff surveyed 30 comparable Florida Coastal County beach operations and received 21 responses. Of the 21 responses, 11 have their beaches open on a 24-hour basis and 10 operate from dawn to dusk. FUNDS AVAilABLE: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that based on the Recreation Advisory Board's recommendation, that Ordinance No. 03-37, Section 1-15, Article II of the Code of Ordinances and Compiled laws not be amended to provide for 24 hr access to any beaches ot"parks COMMISSION ACTION: [["~ APPROVED 6'.1 OTHER: [ ] DENIED Staff directed to bring this item back to the Board after looking into the following items: -Utilizing one park on North and South Hutchinson Islands. -Arranging for supervision during evening hours -Lighting issues Coordination/Sianatures -Risk Management and Legal issues. County Attorney: ~ Management 8t Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept: Public Works: .\ . - Finance: (Check for Copy on , If ~pplicable) Other: I' , ITEM"NtS. - 7 DATE: 1/13/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( X ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT ( ) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Notice of Appeal - St. Lucie County Request for Proposals 03-101 (Mulching Services) BACKGROUND: See Attached Memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in Account # 401-3410-534000-3901' Other Contract Services - Yard Waste. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board uphold the Purchasing Director's decision. COMMISSION ACTION: CE: ~ APPROVED () DENIED ( ) OTHER Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) L DO ~NDERSON COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Coordi nation/SiQnatures County Attorney ( X) ~/ V Mgt. & Budget (X) .cl~fI\(5) Other ( ) Purchasing (X) d Other ( ) Originating Dept. ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable) _ TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CUltural Affairs ~ « / SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: [XJ [ ] APPROVED OTHER: County Attorney. Originating Dept. ,Finance. (copies only). AGENDA REQUEST ...".¡ ITEM NO. sA DATE: January 13, 2004 CONSENT REGULAR X ] PUBLIC HEARING [] Leg. [ Quasi-JD. PRESENTED Jon Ward Cultural Director Council St. Lucie County Historical Museum (SLCHM) Mission Statement and Strategic Plan SLCHM's Mission Statement and Strategic Plan are planning instruments that will provide direction for the museum's staff, actions and services over the next five years. The mission statement and strategic plan are necessary for eventual accreditation of the museum and also for grant funding from certain sources. SLCHM's strategic plan process was initiated in 2000 with a self-study that was funded by the National Endowment for the Humanities. The study was conducted by Mystic Historical Consultants with participation by museum staff, the St. Lucie County Historical Commission, and the St. Lucie Historical Society through interviews and meetings. The planning also included an Architectural Conservation Assessment and a Collections Conservation Assessment completed in 2001. Both of these studies were funded by the Institute of Museum and Library Services. The planning continued into 2003 when, in April, public participation was invited to a day-long meeting to discuss the future of the SLCHM. Approximately twenty-five local citizens attended this meeting, which was directed by the engineering firm of Glatting Jackson. Although future expansion and a site plan were the primary focus of this meeting; of necessity, discussions entered into a wide range of topics pertaining to the museum. An additional general collections assessment was completed by Worth Consulting of Miami, Florida, during September, 2003. Through this study, SLCHM's collections were examined for cohesiveness of themes and appropriateness to the mission of the museum. The study recommended changes in collection policies. The mission statement and strategic plan, derived from recommendations from these various studies and consultations, were approved by the St. Lucie County Historical Commission on January 5, 2004 with a recommendation of approval by the Board of County Commissioners. Not applicable. No previous action. Staff recommends that the Board approve the SLCHM Mission Statement and Strategic Plan. DENIED Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) --(~ Doug Count Coordination/Signatures Purchasing. Other, Mgt " Budget, Public Works, 1\ AGENDA REQUEST ,..,¡ ITEM NO. cg~ DATE: January 13, 2004 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [] TO: Board of County Commissioners SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Administration SUBJECT: Treasure Coast Opera Society Request for Fina cial AssIstance BACKGROUND: At the December 14, 2003 Board of County Commissioners' Meeting, the Board asked staff to agenda the Treasure Coast Opera Society (TCOS) request for financial assistance. In the attached request from Linda Brown, Assistant Parks and Recreation Director, the County staff's actual expenses in 2003 for the TCOS were $4,167.98. The rental income from TCOS was $3,600. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/ A PREVIOUS ACTION: TCOS will receive $1,730 from the Cultural Affairs Council as a grant. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board consider the TCOS request for financial assistance. COMMISSION ACTION: CE: [ ] APPROVED DI OTH ER: [ ] DENIED Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) Douglas . Anderson County Administrator Boärd directed staff to take 520,000,00 from Contingency funds for Cultural Affairs Council to allocate through the Mini Grant Program. Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget:_ Originating Dept:_ Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Purchasing:_ Other: Effective: 5/96 TO: SUBMITTED BY WEPT): SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: . PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA TION: COMMITTEE AGENDA REQUEST ,.." ITEM NO. 8C DATE: January 13, 2004 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [] Board of County Commissioners Administration Bi-Weekly Committee Reports At the April 11, 2000 Board of County Commissioners Meeting it was decided by the Board to place an item on the agenda, on a bi-weekly basis, to give the Board an opportunity to provide updates on the various Committees and Advisory Boards that they serve on. It has been decided by the County Administrator that this item will be placed on the agenda on the 2nd and 4th Tuesday of each month. N/A N/A This meeting the Board will provide updates on the following Committees and Advisory Boards that they serve on: Chamber of Commerce Council on Aging Indian River LagoonNEP Workforce Development Board Land Acquisition Selection Committee Law Library Board of Trustees Shared Services Network Exec Round Table Treasure Coast Council of Local Gov. Value Adjustment Board Tourist Development Council Lake Okeechobee Coalition COMMISSION ACTION: II APPROVED [ ] DENIED [)I.,OTHER: Reports Given MEETING DATE COMMISSIONER Monthly Last Wednesday Quarterly as needed As needed Monthly As needed Monthly Monthly As needed 1 st Wednesday Quarterly Lewis Lewis Barnes Hutchinson Barnes Bruhn Coward Hutchinson Hutchinson/Bruhn/Lewis Barnes Hutchinson E: Douglas . Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals County Attorney:_ Management & Budget:_ Originating Dept:_ Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Purchasing: Other: Effective: 5/96 ) j\' i """ 'wtI AG~NDA REQUEST -- . ITEM NO. ~ DA TE: January 13, 2004 REGULAR [XX] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre SUBJECT: Interlocal Agreement; Bulk Service Agreement with Fort Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) and the City of Fort Pierce BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS A V AILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the form of the Interlocal Agreement, Bulk Service Agreement and map, direct staff to attempt to conclude negotiations with the FPUA and the City of Fort Pierce based on the form of the agreements and map and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreements upon successful conclusion of the negotiations. County Attorney: ~ ouglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) Board directed staff to take initiative to start phase [I. Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Com. Dev. Dir.: County Eng.: Finance: (Check for copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 , .4 "'" .....,I \. AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 2A DATE: January 13, 2003 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Katherine Mackenzie-Smith Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Permission to file suit against Jay R. Hill to require the removal of junk, trash and debris at 3402 Avenue R. BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION CONCLUSION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners grant permission to allow the County Attorney to file suit against Jay R. Hill to require the removal of junk, trash and debris and securing the open structure at 3402 Avenue R. COMMISSION ACTION: lXI APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) ou IsM. Anderson County Administrator /}¿r Review and Approvals [X] County Attorney: [ ]Management & Budget: [ ]Purchasing:_ [ ] Information Tech.: [ x 1 Public Works Director [ ] Solid Waste Mgr_ [ ]Finance:(check for copy only. if applicable) Effective 5196 ..' ì \.., 'wi \ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. ~ DATE: January 13, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Katherine Mackenzie-Smith Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Partial Release of Lien for Sf. Lucie County Code Enforcement Board Order Imposing Fine/Lien in Case No. 96010070 dated May 1, 1996 and Case No. 96030052 dated June 5, 1996 BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A RECOMMENDATION CONCLUSION: Staff recommends the Board authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Partial Release of Lien. COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED [] DENIED C~ OTHER: - ~Ãppraved 4-0 (Camm. Bruhn Absent) Á Doug os M. Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals [X] County Attorney: ¡Å-/ ]Management & Budget: [ ] Purchasing: [ ] Comm. Development.: [ 1 Public Works Director [ ] Solid Waste Mgr [ ]Finance:(check for copy only, if applicable) Effective 5/96 J AGENDA REQUEST ITEM ~. ~ DATE: January 13, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION CONCLUSION: COMMISSION ACTION: PRESENTED BY: County Attorney Katherine Mackenzie-Smith Assistant County Attorney Consent to Merger of Florida Recycling Services with Capital Environmental Resource, Inc. See attached memorandum. Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners consent to the merger and authorize the County Administrator to write a letter acknowledging the Board's consent. r~ APPROVED [] DENIED - OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) IX] County Attorney: }¿J [ ] Information Tech.: Do 9 as M. Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals I ]Management & Budget: I ]Purchasing: [ x 1 Public Works Director [ ] Solid Waste Mgr I ]Finance:(check for copy only. it applicable} Effective 5/96 -,I ~ ....J AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 2D DATE: January 13, 2003 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Victoria Winfield Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: ECKER'S LAWN & TREE SERVICE - TERMINATION OF CONTRACT #C01-10-080 FOR MOWING AND RELATED SERVICES ON U.S.1 FROM RIO MAR DRIVE SOUTH TO HUFFMAN ROAD BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum CA 04-033 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Account NO.1 01-411 0-534000-400 (other contracts) PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners terminate the contract with Ecker's Lawn & Tree Service and authorize the Purchasing Department to go out for bids on the work. f1è APPROVED [] DENIED r r OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Camm. Bruhn Absent) COMMISSION ACTION: Dougl s . Anderson County Administrator [X] County Attorney: ~. Review and Approvals [ ]Management & Budget: [ ]Purchasing:_ [ ] Information Tech.: [ x 1 Public Works Director [ ] Solid Waste Mgr_ [ ]Finance:(check tor copy only. if applicable Effective 5196 \ '-" "" AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. d DATE: January 13,2003 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNïY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre SUBJECT: Indrio North Savannas - Boundary Surveys; Wetland Mapping BACKGROUt\)D: See attached memorandum FUNDS A V AILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Work Authorization Number 12 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Work Authorization. COMMISSION ACTION: ENCE: [~, APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Camm. Bruhn Absent) ouglas Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: År/ Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. Public Works Dir: County Eng.: Finance: (Check for copy only, jf applicable) Eff.5/96 r \ AGENDA REODEST ITEM N"rI2.F Date: January 13, 2004 Regular [ ] Public Hearing [ ] Consent [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Heather Young Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Emerson Estates - Subdivision Improvement Agreement BACKGROUND: See C.A. No. 04-34 FUNDS A V AIL.(State type & No. of transaction or N/A): N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed Subdivision Improvement Agreement with 256 Emerson Avenue, L.L.c., and Port Richey Village Investments, LLC for Emerson Estates, and authorize the chairman to sign the agreement, subject to the execution of a Developer Water and Wastewater Service Agreement for the project. COMMISSION ACTION: CONãNCE: L Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator [1J APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) Coordina tion/Sie:na tu res County Attorney: ~~ /t' M' 1'1 Originating Dept.: Mgt. & Budget: O~a (~. Purchasing: Other: Finance (Check for Copy only, if applicable): (>, '....,/ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-3A DATE: January 13, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION (4110) SUBJECT: Acceptance of roads for maintenance in Midway Industrial Park Subdivision. BACKGROUND: On April 14, 2000, the Midway Industrial Park plat was recorded dedicating South Jenkins Road, Environment Drive and Magnum Drive to St. Lucie County for public road right-of-way. St. Lucie County Engineering received "As Built" drawings on February 2, 2001. Mike Powley, County Engineer, has reviewed the file and found documents that indÎcate these road improvements met County standards in place at the time of construction. Based on this information Staff is recommending acceptance of these roads for maintenance by St. Lucie County. Due to the length of time since these roads were completed, Staff recommends that the Maintenance Bond be wavered. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends acceptance of roads for maintenance in Midway Industrial Park Subdivision and waiver of the Maintenance Bond requirement. COMMISSION ACTION: rx APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) CONCZ Do~a· ~effi~: County Administrator ~ [ x ] County Attorney Jy Coordination/Signatures ] Mgt. & Budget [x] Public Works Dir. ~ [ ] Com Dev Director ] County Engineer ^\VP ] Project. Mgr. ] Purchasing Dept. ] Other MdwayindPr1<..OOc , '-" ~ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-3b DATE: January 13, 2004 REGULAR [ ) PUBLIC HEARING [ ) CONSENT [x) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: ~ p~ tiJA. ~ Dewe W. Hudman Acting Road & Bridge Manager SUBMITTED BY: ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION (4108) SUBJECT: Approval to make an emergency purchase of a new Ice Machine to fill Equipment Request EQ04-232 for $6,000.00. BACKGROUND: The 1994 Ice Machine (#40-2559) has stopped working and is not cost effective to repair. Central Services has recommended that it be replaced with a new ice machine. It ;s imperative that Road & Bridge provide ice for the staff work crews, therefore we are making this emergency equipment replacement request EQ04-232. Funds for purchase of this ice machine will come from the $18,602.63 saved on EQ04-159 (Wheel Loader). FUNDS AVAILABLE: 101-4108-564000-400 - Capital Equipment PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the EQ04-232 to purchase a new Ice Machine for the Road & Bridge Division not to exceed $6,000.00 in cost. COMMISSION ACTION: /XI APPROVED [ ) DENIED [ ) OTHER Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) [ x] County Attorney [ ] County Engineer [ x] Purchasing Dept. ~,v' 7< E: [xl Mgl & B"dget~ [ ] Project. Mgr. ] Other ] Public Works Dir. ~..,.. " ] Other EQ04-232IceMathine.doc .' \w' ..., ITEM NO. C-3C DATE:. January 13, 2004 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION (4110) PRESENTED BY: R~r~:'~~ r Road & Bridge Manager SUBJECT: Approval of Equipment Request EQ04-213 and Budget Amendment BA04-112 for the purchase of a Van for the Traffic Operations Unit in the amount of $18,851.00. BACKGROUND: The attached equipment request EQ04-213 is for a Van to be purchased from the Florida Sheriff's Association. We have expanded our resources and will be able to utilize this equipment in the field to properly handle the maintenance, inspection and operation of the existing closed loop traffic system. This van is necessary and will be an important asset to our Traffic Signal Systems Analyst. We have received the authorized approval from the FDOT to use the JPA Grant 101215 funds for this purchase. Funds are in the grant reserve and will be transferred after approval of budget amendment BA04-112 included. The van will have all the options required by FDOT and will match other traffic vans purchased for this purpose. FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE: 101215-4109-564000-400 - JPA Grant - Machinery & Equipment PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve EQ04-213, BA 04-112 and the purchase of the van in the amount of $18,851.00 from Florida Sheriff's Association, using available funds from the JPA Grant 101215. COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED [ ] rl OTHER Approved 4-0 (Camm. Bruhn Absent) DENIED NCE: D las Anderson County Administrator [X] County Attorney ~ [ X [ P,bI;c W"'''s Depl í~~~ : [X] Finance Dept. ~ (check for copy only. if applicable) )_/ ,'Ì' ¿ff' Coordination/Signatures [XI Mgl & B'dge~ [ ] County Engineer [ X] Purchasing ~ [ ] Other MidwaylndPrk.doc ITEM m1. 3-D DATE: 01/13/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT(X~~ PRESENTED BY: ~- TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Solid Waste Division Leo J. Cordeiro. Solid Waste Manaaer SUBJECT: Request Board approval of revised Equipment Request #E004-197 allocating additional funds to the purchase of 4-800 Mega Hertz Radios, Equipment Request #E004-198 and Equipment Request #E004-199 allocating additional funds for the purchase of two Gator Utility Vehicles. BACKGROUND: During the budget process prices were established for each piece of equipment. As we are getting quotes to purchase the approved equipment the prices are coming in higher than budgeted. Equipment Request #E004-197 is an increase of $791 and Equipment Request #E004- 198 and E004-199 are an increase of 740.38 each. Funds are available in the equipment account . due to #E004-192 07 Dozer coming in under budget. (Budgeted amount $418,000, purchase price $275,311.) FUNDS AVAILABLE: 401-3410-564000-300 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Recommend Board approval of revised Equipment Request #E004-197 allocating additional funds to the purchase of 4-800 Mega Hertz Radios, Equipment Request #E004- 198 and Equipment Request #E004-199 allocating additional funds for the purchase of two Gator Utility Vehicles. COMMISSION ACTION: E: ~ APPROVED () DENIED ( ) OTHER Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) - DO NDERSON COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR County Attorney ( ) Mgt. & Budget (X) Originating Dept. (X) Solid Waste Public Works (X) G/j! Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable) _ ¡ ,\ \ '-" ..J .. ITEM NO. 3E DATE: Jan 13. 2004 AGENDA REQUEST TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: X) PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works-Blda & Zonina Dennis M. Grim Code Compliance Manager SUBJECT: Request for County Commission to grant an Extension for the Removal or repair of Unsafe Structure at 2205 Elizabeth Ave, Fort Pierce. BACKGROUND In August 2002, the Board of County Commissioners issued an order for the repair or demolition of the structure located at 2205 Elizabeth Ave. A permit had to be obtained for the repair or the demolition by October 1, 2002. As of October 9, 2002 no permits were issued. On November 19, 2002 Mr. Wayne Larsen brought a copy of the Warranty Deed stating he had purchased the property. An extension was granted until February 1, 2003. As of November, 2003 no permits were issued. On November 3, 2003 a letter was received from Cook & Menard Architecture requesting 8 weeks to submit changes to apply for permits. Permits were finally applied for on December 23, 2003. FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board of County Commissioners approved Demolition or Repair to the property located at 2205 Elizabeth Avenue, Fort Pierce by February 1, 2003. RECOMMENDATION: Pursuant to the provisions of Article III of Chapter 2-5 of the St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances and Compiled Laws, County Staff recommends that the Board grant an extension until June 01, 2004. COMMISSION ACTION: KAPPROVED 0 DENIED o OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) -- o glas Anderson County Administrator o County Attorney: o Originating Dept: (Pub. WkS.(jj;;Y ~ Review and Approvals o Management and Budget: o Purchasing: o Other: o Other: o Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: I ì v '-' AGENC'A REQUEST ITEM NO. 3F DATE: January 13.2004 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: (X) PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Public Works-Blda & Zonina Dennis M. Grim Code Compliance Manager SUBJECT: Request for County Commission to accept the Improvement Agreement and Post Bond in the sum of $77,071.00 for AI's Motor Home & Trailer Sales Inc. BACKGROUND Permit expired for Building. County Staff cannot do final inspection of building until all site work and landscaping is completed. Property owner wants to purchase surrounding land, further improve property and would like to complete site work and landscaping at completion of project. Deadline will be one year from the day the Board signs the Improvement Agreement. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: County Staff recommends that the Board grant acceptance of Improvement Agreement and Bond. ]I APPROVED 0 DENIED "O'OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Camm. Bruhn Absent) ~r uglas Anderson County Administrator NCE: COMMISSION ACTION: ~ o County Attorney: ;Jl:'/ o Originating Dept: (Pub. Wks.) ()II~ Review and Approvals o Management and BUdgetl#: o Other: A}~ o Purchasing: o Other: o Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: \' \wr ..,I ~. \ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. DATE: C-4 January 13, 2004 REGULAR: [] PUBLIC HEARING: [ ] CONSENT: [X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: SUBJECT: Veteran Services PRESENTED BY: Paul Hiott Request to approve Equipment Request # 04-229 for the purchase of a 15-passenger van and Budget Amendment # 04-121 for an interest-free loan from the BOCC General Fund - Contingency. BACKGROUND: It is the intent of the United Veterans of St. Lucie County to purchase a 15- passenger van for the transportation of veterans to replace one currently in the fleet that has an excess of 94,000 miles. In order to finalize the acquisition of this vehicle under the Florida Sheriffs Association Contract during FY 03-04, Staff is requesting a short-term, interest free loan from the St. Lucie County BOCC General Fund - Contingency in the amount of $18,189.00. Approval of this request is contingent on the successful execution of an agreement obligating the United Veterans of St. Lucie County to repay the money interest free to the BOCC General Fund- Contingency account within 2 years. FUNDS AVAilABLE: Funds will be available in 001-5310-564000-500 General Fund, Veteran Services, Machinery & Equipment. None Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve Equipment Request # 04-229, Budget Amendment # 04-121 and the agreement with the United Veterans of St. Lucie County. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: [j] APPROVED D DENIED Approved 4-0 D OTHER (Comm. Bruhn Absent) County Attorney: Oc;g;oo'ng Dept ~ Finance: (Check for Copy on y, If applicable): x~ Coordination/Siqnatures M,nagement & B"'get ~ ~ Public Works: Purchasing X Other: \we ..., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO: C-SA DATE: Jan 13, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT X] TO: SAINT LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks and Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh SUBJECT: AMENDMENT OF CONTRACT #C03-11-723 TO ACE ELECTRICAL SERVICE, INC. - FAIRGROUNDS LIGHTING PHASE II - CAPITAL PROJECT NUMBER: 03-084 BACKGROUND: On November 25, 2003, the Board awarded the above contract to Ace Electrical Service, Inc to complete the Fairgrounds lighting project. During the permitting process, Code Compliance determined that eight of the poles (line item #7 - install 8 each 30'6fl square dark bronze aluminum poles) did not meet the wind load criteria. In order to meet the specifications and obtain the appropriate permits, the poles must be upgraded at a cost of $2,094.00. I PREVIOUS ACTION: On August 19, 2003, the Board approved the phase II lighting project at the Fairgrounds FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN: 310002-7420-563000-76550 (Improvements OfT Bldgs - Parks Impact fees) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval to amend contract #C03-11-723; increase it by $2,094.00, and authorize the Chairman to sign the amendment as drafted by the County Attorney. . COMMISSION ACTION: CON7E: DO~g M. Anderson County Administrator [ X ] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED Approved 4-0 (Camm. Bruhn Absent) Coordination/Signatures County AttorneY:~Management & Budget: ~~purChaSing: ~~ Originating DePt:~ Other: Finance:· (if applicable) C:\AGENDAS 03-04\1-13-û4 FAIRGROUNDS LIGHTS.DOC ·iJi!-I!I!I@Þ~~, . COUNTY', . FLORIDA -- ~. " ~;: ..I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO: C-SB DATE: Jan 13, 2004 REGULAR ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X] '-' TO: SAINT LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks and Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh SUBJECT: ADDITION TO FAIRGROUNDS RENTAL FEES AND APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION 04-33 BACKGROUND: In 2003, the Board of County Commissioners established the rental fees for the structures at the Saint Lucie County Fairgrounds. In accordance with the newly-completed Fairgrounds Management Business Plan, prepared Analytica, Inc, staff is requesting the Board's approval to add the following rates: Outdoor Arena - $SOO/day¡ Equestrian Arena - $2,000/day. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Resolution 04-33, adding the Equestrian Arena at $2,000/day, and the Outdoor Arena at $SOO/day to the Fairgrounds rental rates. [ X] [ ..' ] APPROVED [ DENIED OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) COMMISSION ACTION: Do '. Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: nagement & Budget: purChaSing:~ Originating Dept: Finance: (if applicable) \.wi J AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO: C-SC DATE: Jan 13, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X] TO: SAINT LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks and Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO EQUIPMENT REQUEST # EQ04-140 & BUDGET AMENDMENT BA04-118 (SOUTH COUNTY STADIUM TICKET BOOTHS) BACKGROUND: The FY03-04 budget contains approval to purchase 2 portable ticket booths for the South County Football/Soccer Stadium. After searching for the requisite best quotes, staff determined that additional funding in the amount of $988 is needed for graphics (County logo, Department name) and a skirt to enclose the lower perimeter of the body of the booth. Each booth will cost $9,194 and are made of aluminum. The price includes air conditioning, électrical hook-ups, lighting, highway towing package, 2 ticket windows, heavy-duty corner jacks, graphics and skirt. Staff's intention is to transport these booths to other locations, such as the Fairgrounds, along with the portable bleachers and the Show-mobile. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN: 001-7516-564000-700 (Machinery & Equipment - South County Stadium) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval to amend Equipment Request EQ04-140 and Budget Amendment BA04-118 in order to proceed with the purchase of 2 portable ticket booths for South County Football/Soccer Stadium. [ X ] [ ] APPROVED [] DENIED OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) COMMISSION ACTION: Dou . Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: ,J¡/ /Management Originating Dept: "1 Ø1I Other: & BUdget'~PurChaSing, ~~ Finance: (if applicable) C:\AGENDAS 03-04\1-13-04 SOUTH COUNTY STADruM BooTHS.DOC ~ AGENDA REQUEST .",I ITEM NO: C-SE DATE: January 13, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X] '··:S~~tIl¡@Iß~-'~' COUNTY'. '. FLORIDA -- TO: SAINT LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks and Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh SUBJECT: REQUEST FOR HIGHER PURCHASE LIMIT FOR CALLAWAY GOLF AND TAYLOR-MADE GOLF, INC. BACKGROUND: The approved list of sole source providers supplying our Golf Course with merchandise includes Callaway Golf and Taylor-Made Golf Inc with a purchase level of $10,000. As a result of the popularity of these particular golf clubs and accessories, the County Golf Course is exceeding the approved purchase level of $10,000. Accordingly, staff requests the Board's approval of a purchase limit of $25,000. PREVIOUS ACTION: On October 26, 1999, the Board approved a request for sole source status of Callaway Golf Clubs/Accessories, Taylor-Made Golf Clubs/Accessories, and Titlelist Golf Division. On September 25, 2001, Bridgestone Sports U.S.A., Foot Joy, and Spalding Worldwide Sports were added to this list and approved as sole source providers. FUNDS AVAILABLE IN: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recorronends the Board's approval in raising the purchase limit to $25,000 for Callaway Golf and Taylðr Made Golf Inc for FY03-04. [ X] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) Do . Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures County Attorney' ~ Management & Budget' Purchasing' ~~ Originating DePt:~s: Other: Finance: (if applicable) C:\AGENDAS 03-04\1-13-04-GOLF-COURSE.DOC '--' AGENDA REQUEST wi ITEM NO: C-SF DATE: January 13, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X] ·~"F:J~~@IJt..:~~.;~ " COUNTY", ';' FLORIDA -- TO: SAINT LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks and Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh SUBJECT: AWARD OF BID #04-009 - TO SEEBREEZE JANITORIAL TO CLEAN THOMAS J. WHITE SSTADIUM BACKGROUND: On December 18, 2003, Saint Lucie County received three bid packages to provide cleaning services to Thomas J. White stadium. Five hundred and twenty six (526) companies were notified, sixteen (16) bid documents were distributed, and three (3) responses were received. This agenda requests the Board's authorization for the Parks and Recreation Department to enter into a contract with Seebreeze Janitorial, the lowest responsive bidder, for the aforementioned services. A review of the proposal reveals that the scope of work is reasonably priced and the/company will provide quality services. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FUNDS ARE AVAILABLE IN: 461-75201-534000-700 (Other Contractual Services - Sports Complex) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval to award the contract to Seebreeze Janitorial, and authorization for the Chairman to sign it as drafted by the County Attorney. x] ] APPROVED OTHER: ( DENIED 7CE: _ Doug M. Anderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: Approved 4-0 (Conm1. Bruhn Absent) (ì ~ Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: ~ Ma~ement & BUdget¡~rChaSin9:~ Originating DePt:~~rks: Other: Finance: (if applicable) C:\AGENDAS 03-04\1-13-04-SPORTS COMPLEX CLEANING.DOC \ ~ ..,I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO: C-5G DATE: January 13, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X] TO: SAINT LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks and Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh SUBJECT: PURCHASE OF INFIELD TARP FOR THE MAIN FIELD AT THOMAS J. WHITE ~STADIUM (EQ04-234) AND BUDGET AMENDMENT 04-122 BACKGROUND: The infield tarp at the Sports Complex is in dire need of replacement. Over the years, it has been repeatedly mended with patches in an effort to maintain serviceability. Staff has determined that, at this point, it is beyond repair and a new one should be procured prior to the opening of the 2004 Spring Training season. The requisite quotes have been obtained with the lowest being from C & H Baseball at a cost of $4,730, including shipping. This agenda requests the Board's apþroval for the purchase. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN: 461-75201-564000-700 (Machinery & Equipment - Sports Complex/Maintenance) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners grant approval to procure the tarp (EQ04-234), and approve Budget Amendment 04-122 in the amount of $4,730. COMMISSION ACTION: t~ ] [ ] APPROVED [] DENIED OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) Dou . Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: ~Management & BUdget:~ Purchasing: a/ Other: Finance: (if applicable) Originating DePt:~ Parks: '\. /' , ' \w AGENDA REOUEST )¡¡¡II -. " \ ITEM NO. 6 -......."...... J ;. _ . . . .. .. DATE: January 13, 2004 REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT [X] TO: ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Management and Budget PRESENTED BY: Marie Gouin SUBJECT: Usage of Government Day Funds BACKGROUND: The Board declared "St. Lucie County Government Day" on April 22, 1994 and accepted contributions (see attached list) for Government Day activities. Since that time, a liability remains from unexpended Government Day funds in the amount of$347.11. Therefore, Administration recommends using these funds for the County's Annual Picnic to remove this liability. FUNDS A V AILABLE: General Fund Liability Account #001-0000-229022-100 PREVIOUS ACTION: On April 12, 1994, the Board adopted Resolution No. 94-92 (attached) proclaiming April 16, 1994, through April 23, 1994, as "County Government Week" and further proclaiming April 22, 1994, as "St. Lucie County Government Day" in St. Lucie County, Florida. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve usage of the 1994 Government Day funds for the County's Annual Picnic and approval of Check Request to disburse funds. COMMISSION ACTION: !XI APPROVED [] DENIED [ J OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) Doug Anderson County Adnúnistrator 11 County Attorney: XX .0 « Coordination/Si gnatures Management & Budget: ~ Purchasing: Originating Dept Airport: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) ~.\Q' rnr:ç:T'\HTI\ _\ r.c,!T'I.\~' ð, ("";t:,!n _,,,.1\ 1'1 1r:nvnA Vt:'T 11\Jn nnr '-" ...., ITEM NO. -7A DATE: 1/13/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT[X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Edward Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Permission to Authorize payment to 1st Fire and Security for Supervisor of Elections Security and Fire Alarm System in the amount of $31,980.00. BACKGROUND: Due to time constraints the Supervisor of Elections did not have time to go out to bid or fully utilize the formal quote process forthe Security and Fire Alarm system for the rlew Supervisor of Elections Offices located at the Orange Blossom Business Mall. The system was quoted by two (2) vendors: ADT ($36,726.00) and 1st Fire and Security ($31,980.00). The Supervisor of Elections authorized the low bidder to proceed and the work was performed without a contract and purchase order. FUNDS AVAILABLE: 316-1910-534000-100· Other Contractual Services PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMEN DATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Purchasing Department to waive the bidding and contract procedure, cut an "after the fact" Purchase order and authorize the payment to 1 st Fire & Security in the amount of $31,980.00. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: ¿pi I]C . APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Col11m. Bruhn Absent) Doug Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: (X) )ð/ Mgl & Budget: Purchasing Mgr.:~) Or Other: Originating Dept_l ) Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) ./ ,J~ ....¡ ITEM NO. C- 7B DATE: 1/13/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker. PurchasinQ Director SUBJECT: Permission to advertise Invitation for Bid for Installation of Bleachers at South County Stadium. BACKGROUND: To solicit bids for Installation of Bleachers at South County Stadium. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for the request for permission to advertise Invitation for Bid for Installation of Bleachers at South County Stadium. COMMISSION ACTION: CE: á() APPROVED () DENIED ( ) OTHER Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) DO ANDERSON COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Coord ination/SiQnatures County Attorney ( X) ~/ Mgt. & Budget ( ) Other ( ) Purchasing (X) ~I/ Originating Dept. ( ) Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable)_ ft. ...."J ITEM NO. C - 7C DATE: 1/13/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasinq Department Ed Parker. Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: First Amendment to Contract No. C03-04-294 with Dickerson Florida Inc. BACKGROUND: On April 8, 2003 the Board of County Commissioners approved, pursuant to Bid No.03-038, a contract with Dickerson Florida Inc. (secondary vendor) for the purchase of Asphalt Type S3 and Asphalt Stickler for the patching and repairing of public roads in St. Lucie County. On several occasions we have not been able to purchase needed asphalt because one or both of the these companies were not making Type S3 asphalt or one was shut down while the other was not making this asphalt. Staff is now request authorization to add Asphalt Type S1 to the contract at the same unit cost. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Account #101-4110-553200-400' Road Materials Account #101002-41122-546200-42003 . Maintenance Imp. Projects PREVIOUS ACTION: On April 8, 2003 the Board of County Commissioners approved the award of Bid No. 03-038. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the first amendment to contract C03-04-294 with Dickerson Florida Inc., and authorization for the Chairman to sign the amendment as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: C:pCE: _ Doug Anderson County Administrator fXI APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) Coordi nation/Siqnatu res County Attorney:(X) ~ / VV Mgt. & Bodge! (X) frtj) Jrr¡rrQ'1 Other: r£/L,4 Purchasing Mgr.:(X) :' ./ Originating Dept:: Other: Fjnance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) .."I ITEM NO. C- 7D DATE: 1/13/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: PurchasinQ Department Ed Parker. PurchasinQ Director SUBJECT: First Amendment to Contract No. C03-04-295 with Ranger Construction Industries Inc. BACKGROUND: On April 8, 2003 the Board of County Commissioners approved, pursuant to Bid No.03-038, a contract with Ranger Construction Industries Inc. (primary vendor) for the purchase of Asphalt Type S3 and Asphalt Stickler for the patching and repairing of public roads in St. Lucie County. On several occasions we have not been able to purchase needed asphalt because one or both of the these companies were not making Type S3 asphalt or one was shut down while the other was not making this asphalt. Staff is now requesting authorization to add Asphalt Type S 1 to the contract at the same unit cost. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Account # 101-4110-553200-400 . Road Materials Account # 101002-41122-546200-42003 . Maintenance Imp. Projects PREVIOUS ACTION: On April 8, 2003 the Board of County Commissioners approved the award of Bid No. 03-038. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the first amendment to contract C03-04-295 with, Ranger Construction Industries Inc. and authorization for the Chairman to sign the amendment as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: DC APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) Doug Anderson County Administrator Coordination/SiQnatures County Attorney:(X) C:L -'.....,:--. ' j-/~ Mgt. & Budget (X) UO'-/~\Îftl Other: ~(P Purchasing Mgr.:(X) /.:;7!i' Originating Dept:: Other: Einance: (Check for Copy only. if Applicable) -!\ . \w .....¡ ITEM NO. C- 7E DATE: 1/13/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Permission to advertise Invitation for Bid for Waste Collection and Recycling at County Facilities. BACKGROUND: To solicit bids for Waste Collection and Recycling at County I Facilities. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Various Department S' Operating Budgets. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for the request for permission to advertise Invitation for Bid for Waste Collection and Recycling at County Facilities. COMMISSION ACTION: (~, APPROVED () DENIED ( ) OTHER Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) NCE: DO G ANDERSON COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Coordi nation/Sig natures g County Attorney ( X) I./<J Originating Dept. ( ) Mgt. & Budget (X) ~ Other ( ) Purchasing (X) r;;~ø Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable)_ \w '...I ITEM NO. ~ DATE: January 13. 2004 ':¡;"LU¡CII~-"9' COUNTY . FLORIDA - AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Administration/Media Relations ~o.i:6l~ Shane DeWitt Technical Operations Manager, SLCTV SUBJECT: New Editing Workstations for Media Relations (Budget Amendment #04-123, Equipment Request #04-233) BACKGROUND: I In the FY 03-04, we added a new staff position, which requires an additional editing workstation to speed up the post-production process, allowing for more locally originated programming on SLCTV. We also need another workstation for LIVE switching of the various Board meetings starting earlier this year. This second computer can also be used as a backup editing workstation. Money was budgeted for these computers in Operating Supplies 001-1225-552000·100, but because these computers are capital equipment, $9,500 must be moved to Machinery and Equipment, 001·1225-564000· 100. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Upon Board approval- funds will be available in Account # 001·1225·564000-100 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Budget Amendment #04·123 and Equipment Request #04·233 in the amount of $9,500 from Operating Supplies to Machinery and Equipment, for the purchase of two (2) above-mentioned editing workstations. Staff also recommends that The Computer Station be awarded the bid due to the customized nature of these workstations. Although the other two bidders are lower in cost, they do not meet the required specs for the workstations. Also included in this packet is recommendation from the I.T. Department on this matter. C:IDOCUMENTS AND SETTINGS\AOMINISTRATORIDESKTOP\SHANEAGENDA.DOC " '- ......, COMMISSION ACTION: Kj\PPROVED 0 DENIED -0 OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) Douglas Anderson County Administrator º County Attorney: Review and Approvals º Management and Budget: ~ ~ 0 Purchasing: º Other: 0 Other: º Originating Dept: º Finance: Check for copy only, If applicable: Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community SeNices Manager at 772-462-1777 or TTD 772-462-1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to the meeting. C:IDOCUMENTS AND SETTINGSIADMINISTRATORIDESKTOP\SHANEAGENDA.DOC ,-. '....I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-9 DATE: January 13, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ~~ P. M. Bowers SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : Utilities Department SUBJECT: Staf~ requests approval of a Change Order with Speegle Construction II, Inc. for the Installation of a installation of a jib crane foundation inside of the new maintenance building at the North Hutchinson Island WWTP in the amount of $8,141.34. FUNDS AVAIL: Funds a~~ available 449-3600-563000-36001 Capital Improvements other than Buildings PREVIOUS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners approved continuing contract #C02-08-601. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Change Order with Speegle Construction II, Inc. for the installation of a jib crane foundation at the North Hutchinson Island WWTP in the amount of $8,141.34. COMMISSION ACTION: [ X] APPROVED [ ] OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) DENIED CONCURRE.NCE: J Doug7Anderson County Administrator . ~ coordination/Siqnature~ County Attorney:X ~ Mgt. & Budget: Ut) rn~~ Originating Dept:X ~ Other: Finance Director: (Chec for Copy only, if applicable)____ Purchasing Other: Eff. 5/96 '-' '-' Agenda Request Item Number Date: IDA ///~ftcf Consent Regular Public Presentation Leg. [ ] [XX] [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development ------ SUBJECT: Request to approve equipment request #EQ 04-215 for two (2) Dell laptop computers. The Community Development Department currently has a laptop computer for the Director. This request is to provide two (2) additional laptop computers to be used primarily by the Assistant Director of Community Development and the Economic Development Manger. These laptops will also be used for departmental presentations and for all remote functions/presentations by Community Development staff. The one laptop now available to staff is nearing the limits of it's capacity and has failed several times during recent report/presentation preparation. The funds for this purchase are available due to the department's leasing of a copier, as opposed to the purchase that was budgeted. BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Funds are available in 102-15101-564000-100 - Capital Equipment. None Staff recommends that the Board approve EQ 04-215, for the purchase of 2 laptop computers. COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED CJ OTHER CJ DENIED Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) 7ENCE: ?- Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: r ,./ Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: JfiU fV)rfltJ Info TechnOlogy:~ Purchasing: Other: 47/ (insert file ref) '-' ~ Agenda Request Item Number: MeetlnQ Date: 108 Jan 13, 2004 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ x ] [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ SUBJECT: ---_/ Approve Budget Amendments BA-04-124 and BA-04-125" to transfer funds into the appropriate accounts to provide for the purchase of additional software licenses and support equipment for the City View Building Permit system.-- To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development BACKGROUND: The Public Works Department, Code Compliance Division, in conjunction with the Community Development Department's GISlTechnical Services Division, is implementing a new building permit system. This system will consolidate building permit, code enforcement, contractor licensing and land development activities into a central land use information system with GIS mapping integration. A system implementation contract was awarded to the Municipal Software Corporation in FY 02/03. This project is approximately 80% complete and we expect to go live with the new system at the end of February 2004. This requested budget amendment is for additional software licensing, required for the second phase of the project. Phase two will integrate the development review activities of Community Development's Planning Division into the system and will also provide an internet based portal, through which customers can schedule permit inspections, apply for permits and enquire on the status of land development activities on-line. The cost of this additional software licensing is $44,192. $31,540 of this needed amount is currently in the Departmental budgets. It is however, nat in the right accounts and needs to be moved via the Budget Amendment process. The remaining funds, $12,652, are available by reassigning funds originally programmed for a document conversion project that has been delayed at least one fiscal year. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Funds are available in 102-1520-549300-100 (licenses and fees) $15,540 and 491-2415-534000-200 (other contract services) $12,652 PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: N/A Staff recommends that the Board approve budget amendments BA-D4-12"1 and BA-04-12S" to transfer funds into the appropriate accounts to provide for the purchase of additional software licenses and support for the City View Building Permit system and that the-Board also approve equipment requests EO-D4-230 and EO-D4-231 for the acquisition of this additional software and web server. This is a sole-source vendor. Software has to be purchased from the vendor installing the software permitting program. COMMISSION ACTION: [XJ APPROVED c=J OTHER D DENIED Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) ,5~ Douglas derson County Administrator Coordination/ Signatures Mgt. & Budget: ,Jt¡II~ t) Purchasing: Other: Other: County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: _./'/'1 Gi/ . (agend765) \w "WI Agenda Request Item Number Date: JOc- 01/13/04 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ X ] [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ SUBJECT: Request of Brandon Capital Corporation, Inc. for fin p at approval for Phase II of the project known as The Sands - PUD. This project is located on a 22.86-acre parcel of property on North Hutchinson Island on the north side of the existing Sands;- Lakeview condominium. Phase II of the project consists of 44 single-family lots. To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development BACKGROUND: Brandon Capital Corporation, Inc. has submitted the final plat for Phase II of The Sands - PUD located on North Hutchinson Island on the north side of the existing Sands, Lakeview condominium. Required access improvements are in place. . FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On September 28, 2000, the Board of County Commissioners granted final plat approval for Phase I of the project consisting of 16 single-family lots. On November 18, 1997, through Resolution 97-166, the S1. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners granted final planned unit development approval for the 60-lot subdivision known as The Sands - PUD located on 22.86 acres of property on North Hutchinson Island on the north side of the existing Sands, Lakeview condominium. RECOMMENDATION: Approve Phase II of the final plat of The Sands - PUD and authorize its final execution. COMMISSION ACTION: []t] APPROVED C=:J OTHER D DENIED Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) URRENCE: Douglas M. An on County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept: Finance: 0, <:: Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: ~ \wi '...I Agenda Request Item Number Date: 10' ;, ., ~ , 01/13/04 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ [ X ] [ ] [ ] To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development SUBJECT: Consider Draft Resolution 04-004 approving the request of Atlantic Truss Company, Ltd., for Major Site Plan Approval for the project to be known as Atlantic Truss Company located on the east side of North Kings Highway, approximately ~ mile south of St. Lucie Boulevard in the IL (Industrial, Light) Zoning District. BACKGROUND: Petition of Atlantic Truss Company, Ltd., to consider Draft Resolution 04-004, which would grant Major Site Plan Approval for the project to be known as Atlantic Truss Company, which consists of 63,750 square feet of truss manufacturing space and a 5,000 square foot office for a total of 68,750 square feet of building area. (File No: MJSP-03-011) . FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 04-004, subject to one condition. COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED CJ OTHER r=J DENIED Approved 4-0 (Camm. Bruhn Absent) ? ZJRE: Douglas M. Anderson - County Administrator v~ Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: County Attomey Originating Dept.: Finance: .' . ... '- "'" AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 11-A DATE: January 13, 2004 CONSENT [X REGULAR [ PUBLIC HEARING [] Leg. [ Quasi-JD. TO: Board of County Commissioners SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Grants PRESENTED BY: / Bill Hoeffner A1? Grants Writer SUBJECT: Authorize the County Administrator or the Cultural Affairs Council Director to sign the grant application for the Museums for America Grant and to make the assurances as required by the application guidelines. BACKGROUND: This grant from the Institute of Museum and Library Services provides funding of up to $150,000 to strengthen the ability of museums to serve the public more effectively by supporting high priority activities that advance the institution's mission and strategic goals. St. Lucie County Historical Museum· intends to utilize funding from this grant to acquire storage equipment that will be used to appropriately manage, care for, and store the museum's collections. The need for this equipment has been identified through a number of studies and consultations completed at the museum. The need is also identified in the museum's Strategic Plan. FUNDS AVAIL.: The grant requires a 1:1 match in either cash of in-kind services. Staff intends to provide an in-kind match of $150,000. In the event that an adequate in-kind service match is not available, a cash match will be provided. It is anticipated the cash match will not exceed $15,000. These funds are available in Fund 001-7310-700- 563005. PREVIOUS ACTION: No previous action. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board authorize the County Administrator or the Cultural Affairs Council Director to sign the application and assurances for the Museums for America Grant. ~~ APPROVED [] DENIED OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) ug'as Anderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney. Originating Dept. Finance. (copies only) . y Mgt & Budget. Public Works. Purchasing. Other. AgeUF2002.doc \wi ...., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 118 DATE: January 13, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: Board of County Commissioners SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Grants SUBJECT: Request for Board Approval to apply for a Florida Department of State Cultural Support grant in the amount of $67,000 to further Cultural Programming. BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County Cultural Affairs Council has received small grants from this funding source in the past two fiscal years. Since the museums are now within Cultural Affairs, the overall department budget has increased allowing for a greater grant request. According to the application, organizations receiving grant dollars should strive to identify and address the needs of and engage diverse audiences within the service community; promote and achieve high levels of cultural or artistic excellence and make such excellence accessible through core public programming and educational outreach. In most cases, the grant awards will be less than requested. Thus, the request will be primarily for a project manager to implement and promote the Zora Neale Hurston Festival, the Highwaymen Exhibit and other cultural programming for residents and visitors to our region. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Allowable match for this grant can be in-kind time, match from Federal grants and general operating dollars used for printing and promotion. After the grant amount is announced, staff will determine which project funds are an appropriate match. PREVIOUS ACTION: In the past two years, the BOCC has approved submitting a grant application to the Department of State Cultural Support Grant program. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize staff to submit a grant application to the Florida Department of State in the amount of $67,000 for Cultural Programming. COMMISSION ACTION: c:~~: - Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator Management & Budget: ~ 4llme¿ Purchasing: Other: _ Other: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Effective: IAPPROVED 0 DENIED o OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) Review and A County Attorney: Originating Dept: Finance: Is 5/96 '- '...I .;.~.~J;."~.' :'::_"__':.''¡_I_r:;;~ :~~i:..í:'~:~;:~':·I: ".'~ .' ..,' ~ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 11 C DATE: January 13, 2004 . " .' > '~'. .> " ':: J , " ':. : J < ~ . '-- .:' ¡ .'. REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [X] TO: Board otCounty Commissioners PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Grants Bill Hoeffner Grants Writer SUBJECT: Request Board Approval to submit a grant application to the National Recreation and Park Association and the United States Tennis Association (NRPAlUSTA) for up to $5,000 to pay for a temporary tennis specialist who will assist in coordinating Junior Team Tennis Tournaments during the Summer,2 004. BACKGROUND: This grant will pay for a certified tennis professional to work on a temporary basis to assist the County's current tennis professional in organizing junior team tennis competition. St. Lucie County has conducted a junior team tennis Summer program for numerous years. In this program, teams from St. Lucie County compete throughout the Summer against teams from neighboring counties. The program ends in a three-day State tournament held each year in Lakeland. Last year, the County was unable to conduct this program due to a insufficient staff. This grant will be instrumental in restoring the program. FUNDS AVAILABLE: No match is required PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: .', . . . Staff recommends that the Board authorize the County Administrator to submit the grant application to the NRPAlUSTA. COMMISSION ACTION: J,ÄPPROVED 0 DENIED o OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) CONCUR?' ¿-. Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator -- Review and APp~als County Attorney: Originating Dept: Finance: Management & Budget: Other: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Purchasing: Other: - Effective: 5/96 ,-,. '...I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 12 DATE: Jan.13.2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT[x] INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE TO: BOARQOF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: DON MCLAM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CENTRAL SERVICES SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER No.2 TO CONTRACT NO. C02-07-561 WITH NORMENT SECURITY GROUP, INC. ROCK ROAD JAIL SECURITY SYSTEM UPGRADE. BACKGROUND: July 23,2002 the Board of County Commissioners approved Contract No. C02-07- I 561 with Norment Security Group, Inc., for Security and Fire Alarm System Improvements and Replacements for the St. Lucie County Correctional Facility. Project delays, as a result of: unforeseen issues, change orders and variations in drawings/specifications have occurred and the contract will need to be extended 100 days. In addition, items pertinent to the security upgrade project by Norment in the amount of $44,122.07 (please see attached) are needed for continued effectiveness and operation and added to the existing contractScopeofWork. Staff is requesting authorization to increase the contract amount by $44,122.07 and contract time 100 days. FUNDS AVAIL: 316-1940-562000-26001 (Buildings) PREVIOUS ACTION Board of County Commissioners approved Change Order No.1 to Contract No. C02-07 -561 with Norment Security Group, Inc. on September 23, 2003, Item No. c-9a. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve Change o'rder No.2 to Contract No. C02-07 -561 with Norment Security Group, Inc. to increase the contract sum by $44,122.07 and extend the contract time 100 days for a completion date of April 22nd, 2004, and authorize the chairman to sign the Change Order as prepared by the County Attorney. MISSION ACTION: [1d APPROVED [] DENIED r1 OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Camm. Bruhn Absent) CONCUR~ /«- Doug Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: ~- Originating D~l\ LU~/ Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing Mgr.: Other: Other: Eft. 1/97 .. , - ---- -, - --,_. ~*~~.~- -...... ..., ~......,... '-i '...I AGENDA REQUEST .. ITEM NO. C13 DATE: January 13, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: Ken Mascara, Sheriff SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): SHERIFF SUBJECT: Approval granting request for $221 ,863 from Detention impact fees to purchase a new Jail Management System. The total cost of the Jail system is $294,000. I have secured a grant for $72,137. BACKGROUND: The attached memorandum dated January 6,2004, Regarding Jail Management System, references the background regarding this request and supporting documentation. In summary, it is mandatory that the existing Eagle jail system be replaced as early as possible. The Eagle Jail system is outdated, unreliable and just recently has experienced major system failures. Unfortunately, this has become a precarious situation that could prove disastrous if it is not addressed. FUNDS AVAIL: These are funds available in the Public Building Correction Facility impact fees. . Account #310003-2330-562000-200. PREVIOUS ACTION: The Sheriff has an approved grant in the amount of $72,137.00. RECOMMENDATION: office. The Board of County Commissions approve this request by the SLC Sheriff COMMISSION ACTION: P'J APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) Dou as Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: K Review and Approvals Management & Budget: '-1Y)n1JJ¡ Other: ~ / Purchasing: . Originating Dept: ~I:,,; CONS'EN!' ::':;' TO: (&~~6¢Z¡¡~~~¡~~;~~s~zI~~*'~\~[ ....>. ' , '. . i:.·,¡..:..·.:..!f;¡...,·.iJ~.".¡,¡ì.~..." ~".; '.'S"'. "E·... ''-.ftII...' '... .E·D' ..'.~.:".'By.·~.'''~~''';''.·e:C;' S~T~~(¡B~;:Wp~J:'Jc.S\rånd<ReC~eatiOn:. ",;:\f!<:i'¡;i,i,!'~~Î;:', .., 'f~~~~',:" ~~,~ :!;.' ."''t!f{:'':''.'i'i SUBJECT: .'··'.,WORK!:At1THORIZATION)FOR:;GLATTING:«:~CKSONfli;;~IN~t¡T0 ."DEVELOPi!iTHE'i' PARK-FLORIDACOMMUNITIES,;,TR.UST.t(~T)MANAGEMENT ,.. PLAN ' BACKGROUND: The firm Glatting;',Jackson,j;Incis currently under cont~act.'withji¡¡Ø~'~ri1:i~')) Lucie County to develop a proposal for\\design/build of the Lakewood~\~~'J?~r:J<" proj ect. " In an effort to expedite the process and ,retain the FCT,'(funding¡;:Ú?s'€á'f,f:,,,,"', is requesting the Board's approval to issue.a work authorization, as; dra fte,c1 ''':'Þ:r'' ~! the County Attorney, for Glatting Jackson,'Inc to develop the Management,:::::PlàJl't"', Staff has already coordinated with in-house personnel and determined that Iwe,'do not have the expertise or the time to develop such a plan in a timely mannér",;;Lri> order to receive FCT reimbursement. The scope of services, as well as applicåbie fees is attached. The cost of the plan will not exceed $25,000.. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN: 129-7210-534000-76019 (Other Contractual Services - Parks/Lakewood Park) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that thè Board of County Commissioners grant approval to use the services of Glatting Jackson, Inc to develop a Management Plan, through a work authorization as prepared by the County Attorney in an amount of, not to exceed, $25,000, and authorize the Chairman to sign [ X ] APPROVED [.' '] OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) DENIED COMMISSION ACTION: Dou M. Anderson County Administrator ."".'" ,,:.< ;í:",.:¡} , :¡,~!~;~~t: ¿ ~ ; C:\AGENDAS 03.()4\I-I3-04-I.AIŒWooD-WA.G1.DOC,; : · ,. '- ..., ITEM NO. C - 2,1f DATE: 01/13/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Third Amendment to Contract No. C01-02-345 with Creel Pump, Inc. to manufacture and maintain mosquito control lift pumps. BACKGROUND: On February 27, 2001 the St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District Board authorized a contract with Creel Pump, Inc. to manufacture and maintain mosquito control lift pumps. Staff is now recommending that the Board authorize the second I of the contract. FUNDS AVAilABLE: Funds are available in Account #145-6230-546000-000 Pump Repairs and various grants. PREVIOUS ACTION: On February 11,2003 The St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District Board approved the Second Amendment to the contract. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the St. Lucie County Mosquito Control District Board approve the third amendment to the contract with Creel Pump, Inc., and authorization for the Chairman to sign the extension as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: KJ APPROVED () DENIED ( ) OTHER Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) DOlJG ANDERSO COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Coord i nation/SiQnatures County Attorney ( X) ~/ Mgt. & Budget (X) l!f rn0\~ Other ( ) Purchasing (X) ~,/ Other ( ) Originating Dept. ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable)_ ). ~ ...." AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. £.:16 DATE: January 13, 2004 REGULAR [ ) PUBUC HEARING [ J CONSENT [ X ) TO: Mosquito Control District Board SUBMITTED BY: Mosaulto Control PRESENTED BY: James R. David SUBJECT: Acceptance of a Contribution to Fund Environmental Mitigation For Island Development Group In Impoundment No.5 BACKGROUND: A contributIon in the amount of $4,000.00 has been received from Mr. Anthony A. Yezbek, representing the Islond Development Group, which will cover all costs related to the purchase and Installation of one, corrugated alumInum culvert pipe, in Impoundment No.5. The culvert serves as . mitIgation requirement of their Department of Environmental ProtectIon permit. The culvert provides improved hydrological, nutrient and marine organism exchange between the wetlands oflmpoundment No.5 and the Indian River Lagoon. Due to budget constraints, no other public funding is available for these Improvements at this tIme. BUdget Resolution No. 04-01 has been prepared, In order to appropriate the contributed funds. FUNDS AVAIL.: Funds to be made available In 145-6230-563000-6609 Improvements OfT Buildings -Impoundment 5 MItigation PREVIOUS ACTION: N/ A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board accept a private mitigation contribution In the amount of $4,000.00, to fund the Installation of one corrugated aluminum culvert pipe in Impoundment No. 5. Staff also recommends that the Board adopt Budget ResolutIon No. 04-01, and authorize the Chairman to execute the BUdget Resolution, which provides budgetary authority necessary to purchase and Install the culvert . COMMISSION ACTION: DC APPROVED [] DENIED -r r OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) C:C7 DougìãS Anderson County Administrator --.. Review and ADDrovals County Attorney: Management 8. Budget Originating Dept. Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only. If appllcableJ_ Purchasing: Other: Eft. 5/96 . . . . \w ..."I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-2A DATE: January 13, 2004 TO: ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] PRESENTED BY: ~LGt v-Lvt.- Richard A. Bouchard, P.E. Erosion District Manager SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS - EROSION 3710 SUBJECT: Authorization to extend the contract with Marlowe & Company for the upcoming year (2004) to continue coordinating beach efforts in Washington, D.C. and with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. BACKGROUND: Since acquiring the services of Marlowe & Company in June, 1995, they have effectively communicated and gained support for our project with our Legislative delegation in Washington, D.C. They have assisted in securing critical appropriations and authorizations to construct and renourish the 1.3-mile project and for the USACOE to undertake a GRR to see if federal participation is justified by the addition of one (1) mile to the project length. Just this past year they successfully assisted our Legislative delegation in obtaining $750,000 for the U8ACOE to nourish a small segment along the 1.3-mile shoreline in 2004 and $100,000 to commence the feasibility phase of the southern shoreline. With the need for future appropriations and authorizations in t¡he upcoming legislation, 81. Lucie County needs to be kept well informed on the policies in Washington, D.C. and have the opportunity to position ourselves for federal dollars. This continues to be a .very critical time for our projects in Washington D.C. Marlowe & Company has been most successful in their efforts on the County's behalf. Therefore, we request the Board's consideration in extending the services of Marlowe & Company from January 1, 2004 through December 31,2004. Funds were previously authorized within the FY-2003/04 budget. FUNDS: Funds are available in 184-3710-531000-300 (Erosion District Operatina Fund/Conservation) PREVIOUS ACTION: July, 1995 to December, 2003: Board approved contract extensions with Marlowe & Company. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Erosion District Board approval to waive the bidding process and authorize staff to extend the contract with Marlowe & Company for the period beginning January 1 , 2004 and ending December 31, 2004 for a flat monthly fee rate of $2,850 ($34,200 total), which includes professional services and out-of-pocket expenses; with execution of said contract by the Chairperson. COMMISSION ACTION: [X APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ J. OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) CON7E: /p Douglas Anderson County Administrator .j¿( (x]County Attorney ,'J' ['[Orig'oa'ng D,pl. Publi, w""'~' CoordinationlS ianatures ['[Mgl. & "_, ~t1:I^1~'Î (x]Erosion District . (x]Dept. Revenue Coordinator Bh 11. [ ]Finance Department (Grants) . '-' ~".'''~~ '~_""".~I:'¡.1".o'j¡~ ,," - - - - _ ~"- .,,~,.'.'.~ -. . . ,: . - '. . . ...... t' <,...,..~,;,.,.~.. .~'I'I.~~ . ". - - - '..._-....'~ .:,1(-,.~' f1.,~-' _ l .. AGENDA REQUEST ,...." ITEM NO. C-2B DATE: January 13,2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] PRESENTED BY: ŒcÅu0L ~~k~~ Richard A. Bouchard, P.E. Erosion District Manager TO: ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS - EROSION 3710 SUBJECT: Project Agreement No. 04SL 1 with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection ($974,000) and Budget Resolution 04-01. BACKGROUND: The Florida Beach Erosion Control Program (FBECP) is administered through FDEP and presently provides approximately $30 million annually to assist eligible local governments with their beach erosion control projects. This particular Project Agreement (Ft. Pierce Shore Protection Project --04SL 1) allocates state funds of $974,000 associated with beach and coastal related activities along Ft. Pierce Beach. The following is a detailed breakdown of tasks for these funds: 1) $650,000 will go towards the anticipated (spring--2004) renourishment along Fort Pierce Beach by the Corps, 2) $90,000 to expedite and complete the Corp's General Re-eva/uation Report (GRR), 3) $100,000 for beach & inlet monitoring in 2004, and 4) approximately $134,000 to complete tasks which are underway in the existing grant FDEP (98SL 1 ). FUNDS: Sufficient funds will be made available in the following accounts: $ 85,263 in Account No. 184205-3710-531000-3630; FDEP Fort Pierce Shore Protection Grant. $888,737 in Account No. 184205-3710-563000-3630; FDEP Fort Pierce Shore Protection Grant. $974,000 in Account No. 184-9910-599330-800; Local Match. Budget Resolution No. 04-01 is also attached. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Erosion District Board approval of 1) Budget Resolution 04- 01,2) Project Agreement 04SL 1 with FDEP allocating state ($974,000) and Erosion District ($974,000) funds, and 3) the execution of said documents by the Chairperson. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRE~ ~~ Douglas Anderson County Administrator [}d APPROVED [ ] DENIED rl OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Co 111111. Bruhn Absent) (xjCounty Attorney ['10';';"""' Depl. p"~;, w~ .., C( .:.<J (xjMgt. & Budget; (xjErosion District '{2- (xjDept. Revenue Coordinator eo f's \\ [x]F;"."œ Dep._", IGca"bM-. . I I." ,.. ". . \w 'wi AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-2C Date: January 13, 2004 TO: ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] PRESENTED BY: ~Å._v~Á~'~"-. Richard A. Bouchard, P.E. Erosion District Manager SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS - EROSION 3710 SUBJECT: General Re-Evaluation Report (GRR): Enter into Work Authorization No. 12 (C-00-12-181) with Taylor Engineering, Inc. to complete the GRR for the Fort Pierce Shore Protection project. BACKGROUND: This request is to enter into Work Authorization No. 12 (C-00-12-181) with Taylor Engineering, Inc., in the amount of $170,525, to complete the GRR for the Fort Pierce Shore Protection Project. Authorized by Congress (WRDA, 1996 and 1999), the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps) was directed to prepare a GRR to consider extending the authorized 1.3-mile project one (1) additional mile south of the Fort Pierce Inlet, for a total project length of 2.3 miles. Due to the rapid migration of beach fill southward from 1999 beach nourishment, the Corps was unable to justify extending the project length at this time. However, the draft GRR does verify and recommend Federal participation in mitigating the erosional impacts due to the Federal navigation project-thus reducing the non-federal cost share from 53.7% to approximately 25%. The other important element that the GRR addresses is the high erosion rate immediately south of the inlet and the need to incorporate structures into the long- term management plan. -Corps Headquarters' (HQ) reviewed the original draft (dated September, 1998) of the GRR with a subsequent draft revised (dated October, 2000) by the District addressing their comments. The District withheld re-submittal of the GRR to HQ until concerns with the Environmental Section were addressed and several other sections updated. Several copies of correspondence from the County to the Corps expressing concerns regarding delays with the GRR are attached. Additional correspondence from Congressman Alcee Hastings regarding a meeting he held with the Corps and a commitment by the Corps to complete the GRR by September, 2003 is also attached. Since the Corps has done very little to complete the GRR, they have agreed to allow the County to step in and complete it. To assure the County is credited for this work the County will seek language in the next WRDA Bill to that affect. The attached work authorization includes a detailed scope of work from Taylor Engineering to accomplish these tasks. FDEP has reviewed and approved the scope of work and will cost share this work through grant agreement 04SL 1 at 50%. FUNDS: Funds for these services will be made available in the following accounts: $85,263 in Account No. 184205-3710-531000-3630; FDEP Fort Pierce Shore Protection Grant. $85,263 in Account No. 184-3710-531000-3630; Erosion Control-Conservation. PREVIOUS ACTION: January 13, 2004: FDEP Grant 04SL 1 (50% match) approved $974,000 in State funds. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Erosion District Board approval of Work Authorization No. 12 (C-00-12-181 ) with Taylor Engineering, Inc. ($170,525) and execution of said agreement by the Chairperson. COMMISSION ACTION: :cuz Douglãs Anderson County Administrator [X APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Camm. Bruhn Absent) [x]County Attorney [x]Originating Dept. Public WOrkS~ c.... -\ y'<":' CoordinationlS ianatures IxlMgl & &,get-:j'::h11"1:? [x]Erosion District Aß [x]Dept. Revenue Coordinator ~~ [xJF~aoœ D._t (G"mts)~ ·, t '-' ;~~f;'~~ ;,.t; ~:I?¡~~~ ~~ì^"ri~~ AGENDA REQUEST ....., ITEM NO. C-2D DATE: January 13, 2004 REGULAR [ 1 PUBLIC HEARING [ 1 CONSENT [X 1 TO: ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT PRESENTED BY: ffi..ð~.~~~~h~ \CL Richard A. Bouchard, P.E. Erosion District Manager SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS - EROSION 3710 SUBJECT: Amendment No.5 to Project Agreement No. 98SL 1 with the Florida Department of Environmental Protection. BACKGROUND: The Florida Beach Erosion Control Program (FBECP) is administered through FDEP and presently provides approximately $30 million annually to assist eligible local governments with their beach erosion control projects. This particular Project Agreement (Ft. Pierce Beach Restoration -98SL 1) presently allocates state funds of $4,424,692 associated with beach and coastal related activities along Ft. Pierce Beach. This amendment extends the expiration date to December 31, 2004 and updates line items in the funding table to reflect actual and anticipated expenditures in the proper task. In particular, funding is identified for the North Causeway Island . Shoreline Stabilization project. FUNDS: Sufficient funds are available in 184203-3710-563000-3630 (FDEP Grant/Erosion District-Imp OIT Bldg). PREVIOUS ACTION: November 10, 1998: Board approved Project Agreement 98SL 1, Fort Pierce Beach Restoration. January 9,2001: Board approved Amendment NO.1 to include additional state funds ($115,880). April 24,2001: Board approved Amendment NO.2 extending the expiration date to June 30, 2003. December 10,2002: Board approved Amendment No.3 to include additional state funds ($117,500) and extend the expiration date to June 30, 2004. May 27,2003: Board approved Amendment NO.4 to include additional state funds ($260,562). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Erosion District Board approval of Amendment No.5 to Project Agreement 98SL 1 with FDEP, contingent on final review and approval of said agreement by the County Attorney, and execution of said agreement by the Chairperson. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: /- ~s Anderso~ County Administrator IXJ APPROVED [ 1 DENIED [ J OTHER: Approved 4-0 (Comm. Bruhn Absent) (x]County Attorney ,-. (X]~riginating Dept. Public WOrkS~' Cì ~ coord;nation/s;ana~ (x]Mgt. & Budget <if í\ ì \'\~ (x]Dept. Revenue Coordinator ß Pr 'n (xIE,,,,;o" [);sO;" ßAß [xF;na"œ De.,,,,,,oo, (Gr.",,) . ~~ ,>~~7¡X~"~...::;·~t-':.?·"·, ".~,'.~,~' ~, &~ JANUARY 6/ 2004 6:00 PM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME ALL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED. PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES AND PAGERS PRIOR TO ENTERING THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS. GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES - Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA - Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items, which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS - These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesday at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the board. " ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION - Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have Î backup material, please have eight copies for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS - These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT - Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting of general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM - Please be respectful of others opinions. MEETINGS - All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Assistive Listening Device is available to anyone with a hearing disability. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at (772) 462-1777 or TDD (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WWW.co.st-lucie.fl.us John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District No. 1 District No.2 District No. 3 District No. 4 District No. 5 January 6, 2004 6:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held on December 16, 2003 2. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENT A TIONS/ ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Resolution No. 04-24 - Supporting the establishment of fair and equitable rates for development disability services for the Florida Department of Children and Families. - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the Resolution as drafted. B. Resolution 04-27 - Proclaiming January 6, 2004 as "Eddie Enns Day" in St. Lucie County, Florida - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the Resolution as drafted. C. Reading of the Announcements by the County Administrator 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA ." i . Regular Agenda January 6, 2004 Page Two ------ ---------- ------- PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. PUBLIC WORKS A. Engineering - Sunland Gardens M.S.B.U. (Phase 1) Second Public Hearing potable Water Improvements - FPUA - Consider staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 03-323 to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the Sunland Gardens Municipal Services Benefit Unit; approve the attached preliminary assessment roll; approve the expanded MSBU boundary; and authorize staff to proceed with construction of the project. 5. COUNTY ATTORNEY B. Herman's Bay Beach Access - Consider staff recommendation that the Board determine if it wishes to exchange the proposed property and, if the Board authorizes the exchange of the proposed property, approve Resolution No. 04-26 as drafted and authorize the Chairman to sign the Resolution. C. Petition for Abandonment - Abandon a 30 ft. Platted easement through the Northwest ~ of Section 4 Resolution No. 03-330 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Resolution, instruct staff to publish the final Notice of Abandonment, and record Resolution No. 03-330, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Public Hearing and Proof of Publication of the Notice of Abandonment in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT .,. i \ D. Ordinance No. 04-001 - Amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code By Creating Section 10.01.10, Administrative Variances To Any Required Dimensional Requirement of this Code to Accomplish the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan and this Code - No action is required from the County Commission at this time. This is the first of two required public hearings on this matter. The second public hearing on this matter will be held on Tuesday January 20, 2004, at 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. E. Ordinance No. 04-002 - Amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending section 7.10.13 Sewage and Septage Treatment Facilities in Agricultural Zoning Districts to provide for municipal annexation of a facility site. No action is required from the County Commission at this time. This is the first of two required public hearings on this matter. The second public hearing on this matter will be held on Tuesday January 20, 2004, at 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. Regular Agenda January 6, 2004 Page Three F. Ordinance No. 04-004 - Stipulated Settlement Agreement between St. Lucie County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Stipulated Settlement Agreement between St. Lucie County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs in regard to the outstanding issues of non-compliance with the adopted St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and further that the Board approve Draft Ordinance 04-004 which would approve the remedial amendments to the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. END OF PUBLIC HEARINGS -- ------ --- ---- --- 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Fort Pierce Annexations K-256 and K-257 - Consider Initiating Conflict Resolution proceedings pursuant to Chapter 164, Florida statutes - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chairman to sign a resolution initiating the Conflict Resolution Process with the City of Ft. Pierce in regard to proposed Annexation Ordinance K-257 and further that staff be authorized to appear at the City Commission meeting of January 20, 2004 to express our concerns on this matter. Staff further requests that authorization be given to formally request that the County be a full review and comment agency for any development proposal that may be filed on the properties associated with City of Ft. Pierce annexation Ordinance K-256. B. Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility - Consider staff comments to the City of Port St. Lucie Conditional Use Application for a regional wastewater treatment facility (McCarty Road site). ." i · 7. COUNTY ATTORNEY Ordinance No. 03-19 - Animal Noise in AR-1 Zoning Districts - Staff requests further direction from the Board with regard to Ordinance No. 03-19. · . CONSENT AGENDA JANUARY 6, 2004 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve warrants list No. 1 4,1 5 and 16. 2. PUBLIC SAFETY Resolution No. 04-01 approving Emergency Management Services (EMS) Grant from the State of Florida Health Department. - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Resolution, and authorize the Chairman to sign the application. 3. CENTRAL SERVICES A. Bid Waiver and Sole Sources Declaration - AIC Division Central Services - Consider staff recommendation to approve the bid waiver and sole source declaration to Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. for the APOGEE Energy Management Systems Upgrade at a cost of $40,000.00. B. Change Order No. 3 - TECO Energy Systems - Amend scope of work for administrative complex to omit installation of energy management services controls for roof top AIC units serving the Civic Auditorium. - Consider staff recommendation to approve Change Order No. 3 to Contract No. CO 1-09-590 with TECO Energy Systems to reduce the contract sum by $32,396.00 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Change Order. 4. PARKS AND RECREATION Release of Retainage to Jim Wright Construction Inc. & Final Payment - Consider staff recommendation to approve the final payment and release the retainage of $8/296 to Jim Wright Construction Inc. 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ." i · Request of St. Andrew Park Inc., - Consider staff recommendation to enter into a Road Impact Fee Credit Agreement with St. Andrews Park, Inc., the developers of the St. Andrews Park residential development, for the costs associated with the construction of Selvitz Road from Peachtree Boulevard to Parkway Elementary School and that discounting for the impacts of this development on this roadway segment the credit amount be established at $1/117/416 (or 87.9% of the overall cost of $1/271/236). The impact fee credits granted by this action would be applicable only to the St. Andrews Park mixed use commercial/residential development, and are not assignable to any other impact fee category or classification. , . . , Consent Agenda January 6, 2004 Page Two 6. PUBLIC WORKS A. Environmental Resources - Request of Atlantic, Truss Company for an exemption from the requirements of Section t t.02.09(A}(5), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the project to be known as Atlantic Truss Company - Major Site Plan - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the request and that no environmental impact report be required for this project. B. Engineering Division - Equipment Purchase - Budget Amendment 04- t t 9 - Request permission to upgrade the AutoCAD software for our Division and purchase a printer for the MSBU program - Consider staff recommendation to approve Budget Amendment 04- t t 9 to transfer funds into proper expenditure accounts. C. Engineering Division - Change Order No. t for modification to the Midway Road and Glades Cut-Off Road Intersection Improvements and Midway/Glades Cut-Off Road Utilities Extension - Phase t A projects. - Consider staff recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign Change Order No. t in the amount of $64,302.46 for a total contract price of $5,092,956.07 to Community Asphalt Corp. for modification to the plans. D. Road and Bridge Division - Conditional Acceptance of Prima Vista Blvd. Extension - Consider staff recommendation to conditionally accept the extension of Prima Visa Blvd. and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Maintenance Agreement. 7. ADMINISTRATION Board of Adjustment Appointment - Consider staff recommendation to ratify Commissioner Lewis's appointment of Buddy Emerson to the Board of Adjustment. ." I . 8. PURCHASING A. Bid #04-008, Golf Ball Retrieval Services - Consider staff recommendation to award Bid #04-008 to Birdie Golf Ball Co., and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. B. Permission to Advertise Invitation for Bid for Dollman Park Riverside (West) Parking Lot. - Consider staff recommendation to approve the request to advertise. C. Second Extension to Contract No. CO t -0 t -266 with Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley Architects and Associates, P .A. - Consider staff recommendation to approve the second extension to the contract and authorize the Chairman to sign the extension as prepared by the County Attorney. Consent Agenda January 6, 2004 Page Three D. Second Extension to Contract No. C01-01-292 with REG Architects, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to approve the secònd extension and authorize the Chairman to sign the extension as prepared by the County Attorney. E. Bid Waiver and sole source vendor contract with JWC Environmental for the purchase of an Auger monster and parts - Consider staff recommendation to approve the bid waiver and declare JWC Environmental a sole source vendor for the Auger Monster and Parts. F. Bid #04-01 3, Purchase of One (1) Vibratory Soil Compactor with Smooth Drum - Consider staff recommendation to award Bid #04-01 3 to Nortax Equipment Co. for total amount of $72,344.44 and approve the budgeted amount for Equipment Request EQ04-160. 9. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Resolution No. 04- 31 - Authorizing and empowering St. Lucie County to establish an account with Morgan Stanley as described in the Morgan Stanley corporate Account Agreement; in order to construct an Equestrian Center to be located at the St. Lucie County Fairgrounds; and the Adams Ranch, Ltd. Will donate to the County $350,000.00 payable over 15 years in lawful money of the United States. - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the attached Resolution No. 04-31 as drafted. B. Resolution No. 04-29 - Urging Governor Jeb Bush and the Florida Legislature to Pass HB 1117 and SB 2062, known as the Infant Eye Care Bill and nicknamed "Joey's Bill", in order to detect and treat Retinoblastoma. 10. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE A. Contract Change Order No. 1 to Contract #C03-06-452 - Administration Building Addition/Barth Construction, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to approve Change Order # 1 for extension of contract time with Barth Construction for the Administration building Addition, and authorize the Chairman to sign the prepared Change Order. .'1 j . B. Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. C03-05-492 Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. for the Walton Road Annex - Consider staff recommendation to approve Change Order No. 1 to increase the contact sum by $80,841.54 and extend the completion date to December 2, 2004 authorizing the Chairman to sign the prepared Change Order. , . Consent Agenda January 6, 2004 Page Four 11. COMMUNITY SERVICES Permission to advertise four separate RFP's for the FFY 2004 Community Development Block Grant Application - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise 4 (four) RFP's for FFY 2004 Neighborhood Revitalization, Housing Rehabilitation and Economic Development Community Development Block Grant applications. .'1 I , , ..." ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS -- -_._- ---- ANNOUNCEMENTS JANUARY 6, 2004 A. Meeting Changes for January, 2004: · The January 20, 2004 Board of County Commissioners meeting will be changed to 6:00 pm. B. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a workshop on January 15, 2004 at 1 :30 pm in Conference Room #3 to discuss Transportation Issues with The Reserve. C. The North County Charrette will take place from February 7, 2004 through February 13, 2004 with the primary public input session of the charette occurring on Saturday, February 7, 2004 from 10:00 AM until 4:00 PM at the lakewood Park Elementary School. The public is also invited to a presentation of the charrette report on Friday, February 13, 2004 from 7:00 PM until 9:00 PM at the lakewood Park Elementary School. D. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Strategic Planning Session on February 19, 2004 from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm in Room #101. ." i , NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. ~ '-' ...., ~;~!ï(?~~~:' r;')~~~~:Tr~ :l¡~~'t: ~~.~:'~' ~ ~.~ - ,_,"_ ...,.....~O...,__ r' >:t,.( .,.. 1. JANUARY 6, 2004 6:00 PM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME ALL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED. PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES AND PAGERS PRIOR TO ENTERING THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS. GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES - Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA - Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items, which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS - These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesday at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the board. ., ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION - Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have i backup material, please have eight copies for distribution. . NON-AGENDA ITEMS - These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT - Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting of general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM - Please be respectful of others opinions. MEETINGS - All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Assistive Listening Device is available to anyone with a hearing disability. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at (772) 462-1777 or TDD (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. '-'" BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS www.co.st-Iude.fl.us John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District No. 1 District No.2 District No. 3 District No. 4 District No. 5 January 6, 2004 6:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held on December 16, 2003 2. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENT A TIONS/ ANNOUNCEMENTS A. Resolution No. 04-24 - Supporting the establishment of fair and equitable rates for development disability services for the Florida Department of Children and Families. - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the Resolution as drafted. B. Resolution 04-27 - Proclaiming January 6, 2004 as "Eddie Enns Day" in St. Lude County, Florida - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the Resolution as drafted. C. Reading of the Announcements by the County Administrator 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT ." i . 4. CONSENT AGENDA Regular Agenda January 6, 2004 Page Two '-' ....., ----- -- ---------- PUBLIC HEARINGS 5. PUBLIC WORKS ~ Engineering - Sunland Gardens M.S.B.U. (Phase 1) Second Public Hearing potable L/" Water Improvements - FPUA - Consider staff recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 03-323 to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the Sun land Gardens Municipal Services Benefit Unit; approve the attached pr~liminary assessment roll; approve the expanded MSBU boundary; and authorize aff to proceed with construction of the project. 5. /. .. \ NTY ATTORNEY Herman's Bay Beach Access - Consider staff recommendation that the Board determine if it wishes to exchange the proposed property and, if the Board authorizes the exchange of the proposed property, approve Resolution No. 04-26 as drafted and authorize the Chairman to sign the Resolution. Petition for Abandonment - Abandon a 30 ft. Platted easement through the Northwest v.. of Section 4 Resolution No. 03-330 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Resolution, instruct staff to publish the final Notice of Abandonment, and record Resolution No. 03-330, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Public Hearing and Proof of Publication of the Notice of Abandonment in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ." i \ vi Ordinance No. 04-001 - Amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code By Creating Section 10.01.10, Administrative Variances To Any Required Dimensional Requirement of this Code to Accomplish the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan and this Code - No action is required from the County Commission at this time. This is the first of two required public hearings on this matter. The second public hearing on this matter will be held on Tu~$day January 20, 2004, at 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. Ordinance No. 04-002 - Amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending section 7.10.13 Sewage and Septage Treatment Facilities in Agricultural Zoning Districts to provide for municipal annexation of a facility site. No action is required from the County Commission at this time. This is the first of two required public hearings on this matter. The second public hearing on this matter will be held on Tuesday January 20, 2004, at 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. ~ ....., Regular Agenda January 6, 2004 Page Three F. Ordinance No. 04-004 - Stipulated Settlement Agreement between St. Lucie County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Stipulated Settlement Agreement between St. Lucie County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs in regard to the outstanding issues of non-compliance with the adopted St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and further that the Board approve Draft Ordinance 04-004 which would approve the remedial amendments to the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. -- -- 6. r ~ H Fort Pierce Annexations K.25~á,<257 - Consider Initiating Conflict Resolution proceedings pursuant to Chapter 164, Florida statutes - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chairman to sign a resolution initiating the Conflict Resolution Process with the City of Ft. Pierce in regard to proposed Annexation Ordinance K-257 and further that staff be authorized to appear at the City Commission meeting of January 20, 2004 to express our concerns on this matter. Staff further requests that authorization be given to formally request that the County be a full review and comment agency for any development proposal that may be filed on the properties associated with City of Ft. Pierce annexation Ordinance K-256. Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility - Consider staff comments to t~ City of Port St. Lucie Conditional Use Application for a regional wastewater treatment v facility (McCarty Road site). r~ n £:fll~ ¡i ~ L. ~ Of ~oCJd COUNTY ATTORNEY ~ Ordinance No~ 9 - Animal Noise in AR-1 Zoning Districts - Staff requests further direction f[.9Pf1he Boar th regard to Ordinance No. 03-19. ¡J /fP°rrl · B. ., j · 7. '-" ,.." CONSENT AGENDA JANUARY 6, 2004 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve warrants list No. 14,15 and 16. 2. PUBLIC SAFETY Resolution No. 04-01 approving Emergency Management Services (EMS) Grant from the State of Florida Health Department. - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Resolution, and authorize the Chairman to sign the application. 3. CENTRAL SERVICES A. Bid Waiver and Sole Sources Declaration - A/C Division Central Services - Consider staff recommendation to approve the bid waiver and sole source declaration to Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. for the APOGEE Energy Management Systems Upgrade at a cost of $40,000.00. B. Change Order No. 3 - TECO Energy Systems - Amend scope of work for administrative complex to omit instalIation of energy management services controls for roof top A/C units serving the Civic Auditorium. - Consider staff recommendation to approve Change Order No.3 to Contract No. C01-09-590 with TECO Energy Systems to reduce the contract sum by $32,396.00 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Change Order. 4. PARKS AND RECREATION Release of Retainage to Jim Wright Construction Inc. & Final Payment - Consider staff recommendation to approve the final payment and release the retainage of $8,296 to Jim Wright Construction Inc. 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ." i . Request of St. Andrew Park Inc., - Consider staff recommendation to enter into a Road Impact Fee Credit Agreement with St. Andrews Park, Inc., the developers of the St. Andrews Park residential development, for the costs associated with the construction of Selvitz Road from Peachtree Boulevard to Parkway Elementary School and that discounting for the impacts of this development on this roadway segment the credit amount be established at $1,117,416 (or 87.9% of the overalI cost of $1,271,236). The impact fee credits granted by this action would be applicable only to the St. Andrews Park mixed use commercial/residential development, and are not assignable to any other impact fee category or classification. ~ ...",.¡ Consent Agenda January 6, 2004 Page Two 6. PUBLIC WORKS A. Environmental Resources - Request of Atlantic, Truss Company for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5}, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the project to be known as Atlantic Truss Company - Major Site Plan - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the request and that no environmental impact report be required for this project. B. Engineering Division - Equipment Purchase - Budget Amendment 04-119 - Request permission to upgrade the AutoCAD software for our Division and purchase a printer for the MSBU program - Consider staff recommendation to approve Budget Amendment 04-119 to transfer funds into proper expenditure accounts. C. Engineering Division - Change Order No. 1 for modification to the Midway Road and Glades Cut-Off Road Intersection Improvements and Midway/Glades Cut-Off Road Utilities Extension - Phase 1 A projects. - Consider staff recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $64,302.46 for a total contract price of $5,092,956.07 to Community Asphalt Corp. for modification to the plans. D. Road and Bridge Division - Conditional Acceptance of Prima Vista Blvd. Extension - Consider staff recommendation to conditionally accept the extension of Prima Visa Blvd. and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Maintenance Agreement. 7. ADMINISTRATION Board of Adjustment Appointment - Consider staff recommendation to ratify Commissioner Lewis's appointment of Buddy Emerson to the Board of Adjustment. ." i . 8. PURCHASING A. Bid #04-008, Golf Ball Retrieval Services - Consider staff recommendation to award Bid #04-008 to Birdie Golf Ball Co., and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. B. Permission to Advertise Invitation for Bid for Dollman Park Riverside (West) Parking Lot. - Consider staff recommendation to approve the request to advertise. C. Second Extension to Contract No. C01-01-266 with Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley Architects and Associates, P .A. - Consider staff recommendation to approve the second extension to the contract and authorize the Chairman to sign the extension as prepared by the County Attorney. '-' "wII Consent Agenda January 6, 2004 Page Three D. Second Extension to Contract No. C01-01-292 with REG Architects, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to approve the second extension and authorize the Chairman to sign the extension as prepared by the County Attorney. E. Bid Waiver and sole source vendor contract with JWC Environmental for the purchase of an Auger monster and parts - Consider staff recommendation to approve the bid waiver and declare JWC Environmental a sole source vendor for the Auger Monster and Parts. F. Bid #04-01 3, Purchase of One (1) Vibratory Soil Compactor with Smooth Drum _ Consider staff recommendation to award Bid #04-01 3 to Nortax Equipment Co. for total amount of $72,344.44 and approve the budgeted amount for Equipment Request EQ04-160. 9. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Resolution No. 04-31 - Authorizing and empowering St. Lucie County to establish an account with Morgan Stanley as described in the Morgan Stanley corporate Account Agreement; in order to construct an Equestrian Center to be located at the St. Lucie County Fairgrounds; and the Adams Ranch, Ltd. Will donate to the County $350,000.00 payable over 15 years in lawful money of the United States. - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the attached Resolution No. 04-31 as drafted. B. Resolution No. 04-29 - Urging Governor Jeb Bush and the Florida Legislature to Pass HB 111 7 and SB 2062, known as the Infant Eye Care Bill and nicknamed "Joey's Bill", in order to detect and treat Retinoblastoma. 10. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE A. Contract Change Order No. 1 to Contract #C03-06-452 - Administration Building Addition/Barth Construction, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to approve Change Order #1 for extension of contract time with Barth Construction for the Administration building Addition, and authorize the Chairman to sign the prepared Change Order. .., i . B. Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. C03-05-492 Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. for the Walton Road Annex - Consider staff recommendation to approve Change Order No. 1 to increase the contact sum by $80,841.54 and extend the completion date to December 2, 2004 authorizing the Chairman to sign the prepared Change Order. '-" ....., Consent Agenda January 6, 2004 Page Four 11. COMMUNITY SERVICES Permission to advertise four separate RFP's for the FFY 2004 Community Development Block Grant Application - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise 4 (four) RFP's for FFY 2004 Neighborhood Revitalization, Housing Rehabilitation and Economic Development Community Development Block Grant applications. I '-' ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ---- ----- -- ANNOUNCEMENTS JANUARY 6, 2004 A. Meeting Changes for January, 2004: . The January 20, 2004 Board of County Commissioners meeting will be changed to 6:00 pm. B. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a workshop on January 15, 2004 at 1 :30 pm in Conference Room #3 to discuss Transportation Issues with The Reserve. C. The North County Charrette will take place from February 7, 2004 through February 13, 2004 with the primary public input session of the charette occurring on Saturday, February 7, 2004 from 10:00 AM until 4:00 PM at the lakewood Park Elementary School. The public is also invited to a presentation of the charrette report on Friday, February 13, 2004 from 7:00 PM until 9:00 PM at the lakewood Park Elementary School. D. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Strategic Planning Session on February 19, 2004 from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm in Room #101. .., i . NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. '-" ""'" JANUARY 6, 2004 6:00 PM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME ALL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED. PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES AND PAGERS PRIOR TO ENTERING THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS. GENERAL RULES AND PROCEDURES - Attached is the agenda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA - These items are considered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items unless a Commissioner so requests. . REGULAR AGENDA - Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items, which the Commission will discuss individually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HEARINGS - These items are usually heard on the first and third Tuesday at 7:00 P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., then public hearings will be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed time. The Chairman will open each public hearing and asks anyone wishing to speak to come forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) Commissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the ;" Chairman will ask for public comment, (4) further discussion and action by the board. \ t ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION - Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have I backup material, please have eight copies for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS - These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT - Time is allotted at the beginning of each meeting of general public comment. Please limit comments to five minutes. DECORUM - Please be respectful of others opinions. MEETINGS. All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 A.M., unless otherwise advertised. Meetings are held In the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedules additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is provided of these workshops. Asslstive Listening Device is available to anyone with a hearing disability. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Director at (772) 462-1777 or TDD (772) 462·1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. '-' ....., ,4~-;·..1~. :~;¡.,,'tr·':::r:<';'~·· ..,;... :'\' ·...~·4",~i.~< '-.""':~( v~À::~~\~ . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WWW.co.st-lucie.fI.us John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes , . _. 'n ......_.... __~..... .' .,.-... ""',_ ... '.u_..'..__",.., , ~. r.' ~~, ~ .. ,-, :... _ '.' ~ I .~,- District No. 1 District No.2 District No.3 District No. 4 District No. 5 January 6, 2004 6:00 P.M. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE 1. 1)~ 2. MINUTES ,f( Ó Approve the minutes of the meeting held on December 16, 2003 PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENT A TIONS/ ANNOUNCEMENTS A. t)/b B. 6/0 C. Resolution No. 04-24 - Supporting the establishment of fair and equitable rates for development disability services for the Florida Department of Children and Families. - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the Resolution as drafted. Resolution 04-27 - Proclaiming January 6, 2004 as "Eddie Enns Day" in St. Lucie County, Florida - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the Resolution as drafted. Reading of the Announcements by the County Administrator , E'~ YV\1\,I_O'\.J.t\~ttM ~ 0 S ì ,'VI m'¡ e- 5- (j ee.-\r~ Q..JC-. +D..1-J5f~ (1) C ~ r ~\ L K CQ I ~bV-éÁ:+IÙt-1. I t 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT , î' 4. CONSENT AGENDA . r)/O Regular Agenda January 6, 2004 Page Two '-" ..., - -- --.-.-.------- --- ---------------------- PUBLIC HEARINGS \: eÌ'- PUBLIC WORKS1-¡(j:ìIJ~ A. Engineering - Simland Gardens M.S.B.U. (Phase 1) Second Public Hearing potable Water Improvements - FPUA - Consider staff recommendation to adopt ~ \Resolution No. 03-323 to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the / (l6 Sunland Gardens Municipal Services Benefit Unit¡ approve the attached ~o\ preliminary assessment roll; approve the expanded MSBU boundary¡ and authorize staff to proceed with construction of the project. 5. 5. COUNTY ATTORNEY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT J. _ì~f1r or~Th~l1\fo~ 04-001 - Amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code By Creating Section 10.01.10, Administrative Variances To Any Required Dimensional Requirement of this Code to Accomplish the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan and this Code - No action is required from the County Commission at this time. This is the first of two required public hearings on this matter. The second public hearing on this matter will be held on Tuesday January 20, 2004, at 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. B. ~.I~~ ~~\~\\ C. ~/~~ ~~~ .-, i 5 \ . .-' i \ ?w /0 \\¡\""'¡p"- Yj/ i\(}\'" 0 ð 10v J ~çf$ Töbe...- ~jl-.JI'iJ" lò dMtìrtke.. }() 17,,1, Ifi.'\JJfi1...Jm4, Herman's Bay Beach Access - Consider staff recommendation that the Board determine if it wishes to exchange the proposed property and, if the Board authorizes the exchange of the proposed property, approve Resolution No. 04-26 as drafted and authorize the Chairman to sign the Resolution. Petition for Abandonment - Abandon a 30 ft. Platted easement through the Northwest ~ of Section 4 Resolution No. 03-330 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Resolution, instruct staff to publish the final Notice of Abandonment, and record Resolution No. 03-330, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Public Hearing and Proof of Publication of the Notice of Abandonment in the Public Records of St. Lucie County Florida. Ordinance No. 04-002 - Amending the St. Lucie County Land Development ode by amending section 7.10.13 Sewage and Septage Treatment Facilities in gricultural Zoning Districts to provide for municipal annexation of a facility site. o action is required from the County Commission at this time. This is the first of two required public hearings on this matter. The second public hearing on this matter will be held on Tuesday January 20, 2004 at 6:00 PM or as soon f'horo::1ft~r ~c;: noc;:c;:ihlp. Regular Agenda January 6, 2004 Page Three F. (/o~ '...,,) ,,( ~G .~~' \.I "" Ordinance No. 04-004 - Stipulated Settlement Agreement between St. Lucie County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Stipulated Settlement Agreement between St. Lucie County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs in regard to the outstanding issues of non-compliance with the adopted St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and further that the Board approve Draft Ordinance 04-004 which would approve the remedial amendments to the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. END OF PUBLIC HEARINGS ------------ -_._- ------- -- --- 6. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT e : N:[{i/Ì) b/ Ó r/:~ D^ ~" eS B. Regional Wastewater Treatment Facility - Consider staff comments to the City of V~ jS Po,:. St. Lucie Conditio~al Use Application for a regional wastewater treatment 11 "1. eS facIlity ~~caw Road site). C /) 0 ij(M{(,? ().(øV....... lff ,..~ COUNTY AT ORNEY l.:f' . ". ~ L{ l,; L e) Ordinance No. 03-19 - Animal Noise in AR-1 Zoning Districts - Staff requests further direction from the Board with regard to Ordinance No. 03-19. Fort Pierce Annexations K-256 and K-257 - Consider Initiating Conflict Resolution proceedings pursuant to Chapter 164, Florida statutes - Consider staff recommendation to authorize the Chairman to sign a resolution initiating the Conflict Resolution Process with the City of Ft. Pierce in regard to proposed Annexation Ordinance K-257 and further that staff be authorized to appear at the City Commission meeting of January 20, 2004 to express our concerns on this matter. Staff further requests that authorization be given to formally request that the County be a full review and comment agency for any development proposal that may be filed on the properties associated with City of Ft. Pierce annexation Ordinance K-256. \ro '....I CONSENT AGENDA JANUARY 6, 2004 1. WARRANTS LISTS Approve warrants list No. 14/15 and 16. 2. PUBLIC SAFETY , Resolution No. 04-01 approving Emergency Management Services (EMS) Grant from the State of Florida Health Department. - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Resolution/ and authorize the Chairman to sign the application. 3. CENTRAL SERVICES A. Bid Waiver and Sole Sources Declaration - AIC Division Central Services - Consider staff recommendation to approve the bid waiver and sole source declaration to Siemens Building Technologies/ Inc. for the APOGEE Energy Management Systems Upgrade at a cost of $40/000.00. B. Change Order No. 3 - TECO Energy Systems - Amend scope of work for administrative complex to omit installation of energy management services controls for roof top AIC units serving the Civic Auditorium. - Consider staff recommendation to approve Change Order No.3 to Contract No. C01-09-590 with TECO Energy Systems to reduce the contract sum by $32/396.00 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Change Order. 4. PARKS AND RECREATION Release of Retainage to Jim Wright Construction Inc. & Final Payment - Consider staff recommendation to approve the final payment and release the retainage of $8/296 to Jim Wright Construction Ine. t 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT . .~. i Request of St. Andrew Park Inc./ - Consider staff recommendation to enter into a Road Impact Fee Credit Agreement with St. Andrews Park/ Inc./ the developers of the St. Andrews Park residential development/ for the costs associated with the construction of Selvitz Road from Peachtree Boulevard to Parkway Elementary School and that discounting for the impacts of this development on this roadway segment the credit amount be established at $ 1/ 11 7/416 (or 87.9% of the overall cost of $1/271/236). The impact fee credits granted by this action would be applicable only to the St. Andrews Park mixed use commercial/residential development/ and are not assignable to any other impact fee category or classification. 7. ." i . ." i . 8. \w; 'wi Consent Agenda January 6, 2004 Page Two 6. PUBLIC WORKS A. Environmental Resources - Request of Atlantic, Truss Company for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the project to be known as Atlantic Truss Company - Major Site Plan - Consider Staff recommendation to approve the request and that no environmental impact report be required for this project. B. Engineering Division - Equipment Purchase - Budget Amendment 04-119 - Request permission to upgrade the AutoCAD software for our Division and purchase a printer for the MSBU program - Consider staff recommendation to approve Budget Amendment 04-119 to transfer funds into proper expenditure accounts. C. Engineering Division - Change Order No. 1 for modification to the Midway Road and Glades Cut-Off Road Intersection Improvements and Midway/Glades Cut-Off Road Utilities Extension - Phase 1 A projects. - Consider staff recommendation to approve and authorize the Chairman to sign Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $64,302.46 for a total contract price of $5,092,956.07 to Community Asphalt Corp. for modification to the plans. D. Road and Bridge Division - Conditional Acceptance of Prima Vista Blvd. Extension - Consider staff recommendation to conditionally accept the extension of Prima Visa Blvd. and authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Maintenance Agreement. ADMINISTRATION Board of Adjustment Appointment - Consider staff recommendation to ratify Commissioner Lewis's appointment of Buddy Emerson to the Board of Adjustment. PURCHASING A. Bid #04-008, Golf Ball Retrieval Services - Consider staff recommendation to award Bid #04-008 to Birdie Golf Ball Co., and authorize the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. B. Permission to Advertise Invitation for Bid for Dollman Park Riverside (West) Parking Lot. - Consider staff recommendation to approve the request to advertise. C. Second Extension to Contract No. C01-01-266 with Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley Architects and Associates, P .A. - Consider staff recommendation to approve the second extension to the contract and authorize the Chairman to sign the extension as prepared by the County Attorney. , '-" """ Consent Agenda January 6, 2004 Page Three D. Second Extension to Contract No. C01-01-292 with REG Architects, Ine. - Consider staff recommendation to approve the second extension and authorize the Chairman to sign the extension as prepared by the County Attorney. E. Bid Waiver and sole source vendor contract with JWC Environmental for the purchase of an Auger monster and parts - Consider staff recommendation to approve the bid waiver and declare JWC Environmental a sole source vendor for the Auger Monster and Parts. F. Bid #04-01 3 ,Purchase of One (1) Vibratory Soil Compactor with Smooth Drum _ Consider staff recommendation to award Bid #04-01 3 to Nortax Equipment Co. for total amount of $72,344.44 and approve the budgeted amount for Equipment Request EQ04-160. 9. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Resolution No. 04-31 - Authorizing and empowering St. Lucie County to establish an account with Morgan Stanley as described in the Morgan Stanley corporate Account Agreement; in order to construct an Equestrian Center to be located at the St. Lucie County Fairgrounds; and the Adams Ranch, Ltd. Will donate to the County $ 3 50,000.00 payable over 1 5 years in lawful money of the United States. - Consider staff recommendation to adopt the attached Resolution No. 04-31 as drafted. B. Resolution No. 04-29 - Urging Governor Jeb Bush and the Florida Legislature to Pass HB 1117 and SB 2062, known as the Infant Eye Care Bill and nicknamed "Joey's Bill", in order to detect and treat Retinoblastoma. 10. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE .., i . A. Contract Change Order No. 1 to Contract #C03-06-452 - Administration Building Addition/Barth Construction, Inc. - Consider staff recommendation to approve Change Order #1 for extension of contract time with Barth Construction for the Administration building Addition, and authorize the Chairman to sign the prepared Change Order. .., i . B. Change Order No.1 to Contract No. C03-05-492 Paul Jacquin & Sons, Ine. for the Walton Road Annex - Consider staff recommendation to approve Change Order No. 1 to increase the contact sum by $80,841.54 and extend the completion date to December 2, 2004 authorizing the Chairman to sign the prepared Change Order. \w' ...J Consent Agenda January 6, 2004 Page Four 11. COMMUNITY SERVICES Permission to advertise four separate RFP's for the FFY 2004 Community Development Block Grant Application - Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise 4 (four) RFP's for FFY 2004 Neighborhood Revitalization, Housing Rehabilitation and Economic Development Community Development Block Grant applications. .., i . .", i , .. \w.' "wi' ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS -- ---------- ANNOUNCEMENTS JANUARY 6, 2004 A. Meeting Changes for January, 2004: . The January 20, 2004 Board of County Commissioners meeting will be changed to 6:00 pm. B. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a workshop on January 15, 2004 at 1 :30 pm in Conference Room #3 to discuss Transportation Issues with The Reserve. C. The North County Charrette will take place from February 7, 2004 through February 13, 2004 with the primary public input session of the charette occurring on Saturday, February 7, 2004 from 10:00 AM until 4:00 PM at the lakewood Park Elementary School. The public is also invited to a presentation of the charrette report on Friday, February 13, 2004 from 7:00 PM until 9:00 PM at the lakewood Park Elementary School. D. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a Strategic Planning Session on February 19, 2004 from 8:00 am to 5:00 pm in Room #101. ." i \ 0-' i \ NOTICE: All Proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, Individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn In. Any party to the proceedings will be granted the opportunity to cross-examine any Individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community SelVlces Manager at (56 t) 462· t 777 or TDD (56 t) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. - '-' .."", , AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. ;(1) DATE: January 6, 2004 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 04-24 - Supporting the establishment of fair and equitable rates for developmental disability services for the Florida Department of Children and Families. BACKGROUND: The Florida Department of Children and Families Developmental Disabilities Program Office has announced that it will reduce reimbursement rates offered to agencies that provide residential and adult day training services for those with developmental disabilities beginning November 1, 2003. Cheryl King, Executive Director, has requested that this Board support the establishment offair and equitable rates for developmental disability services. The attached Resolution No. 04-24 has been drafted for that purpose. PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 04-24 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCU CE: [~APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 Review and Approvals County Attorney: y Management & Budget Purchasing originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 .... ~ ...", ... RESOLUTION NO. 04-24 A RESOLUTION SUPPORTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF FAIR AND EQUITABLE RATES FOR DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITY SERVICES FOR THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILIES WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. The Florida Department of Children and Families Developmental Disabilities Program Office has announced that it will reduce reimbursement rates offered to agencies that provide residential and adult day training services for those with developmental disabilities beginning November 1, 2003. 2. The proposed cuts represent a 14.3% reduction in Residential Habilitation which are group homes, and a 7% reduction in Live Residential Habitation. 3. The cut in Residential Habilitation will impact homes for persons in local communities, many times operated by not-for-profit agencies, and will displace some of our most vulnerable citizens and force lay-offs in almost every community across the State of Florida. 4. At the same time the Department states that it hopes to increase the quality of services to individuals with developmental disabilities, it has cut the overall direct care staff wage to $7.33 per hour. 5. A 9.5% reduction in Adul t Day Training Services represents a threat to the very fabric of some of our families' lives. .... '-" ....I 6. Working families who desire to keep their family members at home, need Adult Day Training services to provide meaningful day activities for their family members while they are at work. 7. Although seeking work in the competitive job market is a viable alternative for many individuals with developmental disabilities, the current structure, availability of technology and funding is not adequate to place many individuals in the competitive labor market. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board is an advocate for people with developmental disabilities and fears for the future viability of operating programs and homes with inadequate rates. 2. The Board of County Commissioners hereby supports the establishment of fair and equitable rates for developmental disability services. 3. This Board urges the Department of Children and Families to find solutions to the rate structure crisis. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 6th day of January, 2004. ATTESTED: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN COUNTY ATTORNEY ~ D~lâš7\6S!.~~son - Bud_g~.£'· w-.,-~~=--". . ,. ~' "'. . '-' . ~ -~ -- From: To: Date: subject: "Cheryl King" <slarc@gate.net> <douga@co.šfo;lucie.fI.us> 12/15/20033:48:09 PM Budget Cuts On July 1, 2003, providers throughout Florida were issued uniform rates per the redesign of the Department of Children and Families, Developmental Disabilities (DD) Program Office. We at The Arc of St. Lucie adjusted our budgets to the new rates, even though it resulted in severe revenue loss. It was in late October, with not even a week's notice, that DD issued another round of Statewide rate cuts. Due to the latest revenue loss the following has occurred at our agency: Elimination of 2 compliance administrative positions, one clerical position, one day instructor position. The 2 administration staff are now managing 2.5 homes each. The 3 former group home managers were assigned as direct care staff. Basically, it is myself and my assistant operating a 2.5 million dollar agency that serves over 250 individuals with severe disabilities, and employs over 80 staff. The Arc Board of Director's are now faced with the most difficult decision- the closure and sale of one of our 7 homes that serves 6 individuals each. ,., FYI-In May of 2003 we received a seal of excellence from The Commission on Rehabilitative Facilities (CARF), and last November scored at the 98th percentile by the State's auditing agency, The Delmarva Foundation. Without managerial staff it is unlikely The Arc will continue to exhibit the same pattern of excellent compliance on providing quality services to our consumers. Please consider the attached resolution for recommendation of adoption at the January 6, 2003 BOCC meeting. Call or e-mail if further information is needed from our agency. Sincerely, Cheryl King Executive Director ==. ~"___,..=,~._.. _.~,_~~=.. .P~.9~1J .....J -~,,,'>"~...,,-'...~" __ ..-'-^~--~':'""-~''''':::~'-,:._-''''' ."~'~~"'~.,._~~~.:r'o~' ---:.~:~"-~ \\h"\--~ m~J2 !ì~ nrl ii" . .': t . ,- , ,~- ~r"¡,~ 1):; \1".',1,:. :,~'.:,~' - . i, .., ì.."tlì .\.. ..1. ..... ~~ij - ~."~....... ''-.:-:-:- :+:.":-:-..' ¡ 11 .n ..r:;-- ,_~_I",,_~~"~M.~_·,.,r'~ - .' -," '." ~ ~I,~') ,'" - ! (" i".', \ 1qrt'1 \; - ;~. . l \~t.~U I ¡OEe .2,: ~20Q3': .i \l".,\j . ,", '. ,- (\1 \ ,¡ , :! , 1\~....-- -. :-"--....------"""~,.' ..~ ~-,-<..-... !\ -i, ,1\:Ql1i,(",1\:.~'P8VQE ~ \' .;;;;-'::",.:.:~~~:==~_:'::-':_ ~"¡:.__' ~)J I' t' t. pouglas Anderson - Budget Cuts_ ~ '0 i The Arc of St. Lucie County provides residential, day program, and employment services to the most vulnerable citizens in our community-individuals with disabilities. A recently published rate study conducted by the Mercer group, which the state contracted with for 1.6 million dollars, validated that employees working with the developmentally delayed population should earn on average $8.63 per hour. The nature of the work requires great patience and ever-vigilant health and safety quality care. The new rate will drop the hourly wage to $7.33 an hour. You cannot find quality caregivers willing to work for such a low wage- the job is too importànt- they are responsible for the lives of very vulnerable people- if anything these employees should receive a raise - not a cut! The State's actions are devastating and King is urging the legislature to intervene. Additionally, agencies may have to eliminate all management and support staff critical to excellence. /' *** eSafe scanned this email for malicious content *** *** IMPORTANT: Do not open attachments from unrecognized senders *** --- Page _?J ....,¡ , ~ ...." Whereas, the Florida Department of Children and Families Developmental Disabilities Program Offlcé has announced that it will reduce reimbursement rates offered to agencies that provide residential and adult day training services for those with developmental disabilities beginning November 1,2003; apd Whereas, the proposed cuts represent a 14.3% reduction in Residential Habilitation which are group homes, and a 7% reduction in Live Residential Habitation; and Whereas, the cut in Residential Habilitation will impact homes for persons in local communities, many times operated by not-for-profit agencies, and will displace some of our most vulnerable citizens and force lay-offs in almost every community across the state of Florida; and Whereas, at the same time the Department states that it hopes to increase the quality of services to individuals with developmental disabilities, it has cut the overall direct care staff wage to $7.33 per hour; and Whereas, a 9.5% reduction in Adult Day Training Services represents a threat to the very fabric of some of our families' lives; ,/ Whereas, working families who desire to keep their family members at home, need Adult Day Training services to provide meaningful day activities for their family members while they are at work; and Whereas, although seeking work in the competitive job market is a viable alternative for many individuals with developmental disabilities, the current structure, availability of technology and funding is not adequate to place many individuals in the competitive labor market. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The Board of County Commissioners is an advocate for people with developmental disabilities and fears for the future viability of operating programs and homes with inadequate rates. SECTION 2. The Board of County Commissioners hereby supports the establishment of fair and equitable rates for developmental disability services. SECTION 3. The Board of County Commissioners urges the Department of Children and Families to find solutions to the rate structure crisis. ADOPTED in Regular Session this 2003, A.D. day of Joey: B.f4lg§mQ RETINOBLASTOMA ,4~QI1~.t;l~St WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW: 1. Be alerted to your RED EYE PHOTOS! If you get a white reflection where there should be a red reflection... go immediately to the eye doctor! "If I would have known the white dot in his right eye was a tumor, or if his pediatrician would have used an ophthalmoscope ...Joey would be ALIVE!" 2. 11ake sure the ophthalmoscope is used at every exam in a darkened room. It is the "stethoscope" for the eyes and essential to the early detection of tumors and cataracts. 3. An infant needs an eye dilation exam in order for the ophthalmoscope to detect tumors, cataracts and other eye diseases. One in every 677 live births has a treatable eye disease that will blind if not detected and treated. TO HELP IN THIS CAUSE PLEASE CONTACT: Pam Bergsma 561-586-2094 lovejoey@bellsouth.net www.lovejoey.com ACTS One in every 12,000 children in the US is affected with retinoblastoma. It is the most common eye tumor in children and the third most common cancer affecting children overall. Most cases occur in the first five years of life. If detected in the early stages it is treatable and the eye and vision are saved. If allowed to escape the eye. .. there is no cure. INFANT EYE CARKBILL IIJ I oey s. Requires eye dilation drops be use Ophthalmoscope before the· infant hospital, the 6 to 8 week well-bab m and one more at the 6 to 9 month well-baby exam. This only adds ten seconds of time to the exam and the eye drops cost pennies. Early detection is vital to saving the vision and lives of our children. There are so many things in our lives we cannot controL. This one we can FIX! Working together it will happen. TO HEEPJNTtUSCAUSE PLEASE CONTACT: Pam Bergsma! 619~()uth K St. / Lake Worth, FI / 33460 561-586-2094 lovej oey@bellsouth.net .www.lovejoey.com (seminars, posters, information) Through awareness, vision and lives have been saved. Joey is smiling...his message is being heard! www.geocities.com/loveujoey3 JOEY BERGSMA RETINOBLASTOMA AWARENESS Retinoblastoma is the most common eye tumor in children and the third most common cancer affecting children overall. It develops in the retinal cell layer of the child's eye. One in every 12,000 children in the United States is affected with retinoblastoma. Ninety percent of the cases occur in the first five years of life. When detected early the eye and vision can be saved and life is not threatened. When left untreated, the child's eye is enucleated (removed) in order to save their life. If retinoblastoma is allowed to escape the eye there is no cure. Early detection is vital to saving vision and life. NOTE: At a recent seminar, an ophthalmologist told us that he diagnosed a bilateral case (both eyes) in a young girl almost 13 years of age. What you need to know: 1. You can take a picture of a tumor or cataract. Always be alerted to your PHOTOS. If you take a red eye picture and do not get a red reflection there could be a problem. Your retina is supposed to reflect light red. In a red eye picture a tumor will reflect white. In most cases of retinoblastoma, there is a history of wh ite dot pictures that would have saved the child's vision or life. www.loveioeV.com 2. The ophthalmoscope needs to be used at every exam in a darkened room. It is the stethoscope for the eyes. The pediatrician will simply shine it into the child's eyes looking for a red reflex reaction. If they do not see a strong red reflex, the child should be referred immediately to an eye doCtor. If you are not sure an ophthalmoscope is being used, do not assume it is, ASK. A tumor or cataract can start to develop at anytime in childhood. 3. An infant needs an eye dilation exam. The pupil of an infant is small in diameter and needs to be dilated in order for the ophthalmoscope to see tumors and other ocular diseases such as cataracts effectively. It is recommended to have the eye dilation exam before leaving the hospital, the 6 to 8 week well-baby exam and the 6 to 9 month well-baby exam. The pediatricians that are using eye dilation drops want to see all doctors doing the same. It adds only ten seconds of time to the regular exam and costs pennies. NOTE: One in every 677 live births in the United States has a treatable eye disease that will blind if not detected and treated. Cataracts are ten times more prevalent in infants than retinoblastoma and can blind as early as two months of age if not treated. Pre mature babies are the only infants in the US that have an automatic eye dilation exam...we need to ask. Early detection and referral is the key to saving our children's vision and, in the case of retinoblastoma, lives. My beloved grandson, Joseph Hollander Bergsma, died needlessly from metastatic retinoblastoma on December 22, 2000. Joey was three years old. Awareness would have saved his life. I was taking pictures of the tumor reflecting the light and did not know it... these pictures would have saved his vision and his life. More importantly, if an ophthalmoscope would have been used to screen his eyes at his 15 month or 18 month well-baby exam... Joey would be alive. Joey's journey was short, but his message is powerful. The last year of his life was a miracle. We were at Sloan Kettering in Manhattan for 8 months and the Burzynski Clinic in Houston for over 2 months. The last ten days of his life we were at home in Florida. Joey died in his house at Lake Osborne where he wanted to be. Everyday was a gift and I thought he was to be the first child to survive this disease. Through his death I realized the miracle was, Joey is to be the last child to die needlessly from it. We are saving vision and lives through awareness. r' \ ~j Cheryl Bull, a West Palm Beach grandmother saw coverage on channel five last February on Joey's story. Her granddaughter, Elexis, came to visit in April and they went to Disney World. She developed the pictures from the trip and found several white dot pictures like Joey's. Elexis was taken immediately to an eye doctor. Elexis was the perfect case scenario. The tumor had just started to develop... they froze it off with cryotherapy. Elexis not only has her eye and her vision; she has perfect vision in her eye. The doctors will watch her carefully for the next few years, but foresee no problems. Jennifer was not so lucky. Last July, Sandra Padilla of lake Worth complained to her social worker that there was something wrong with Jennifer's eye. She was eight months old at the time. Susan Slocum had been looking at Joey's poster in her Healthy Start Office since last November and had recently seen coverage on "Joey Bergsma Retinoblastoma Awareness Month at the Palm Beach Zoo" on TV. Susan told Sandra to take a picture of Jennifer in a dark room...Jennifer's pupil was white. Her eye was removed...it was already blinded by retinoblastoma tumors. Dr. Timothy Murray performed the eye enucleation at Bascom Palmer in Miami. It is sad that she needlessly lost her eye, but Thank God she has her life. Jennifer had this developing at birth. The "ten second, two cent" eye dilation exam would have saved her eye and her vision. NOTE: Jennifer also had strabismus; the eye was rolling inward. In some cases tumors or cataracts will cause irregular eye movement. Be alerted to your child's eye movement; like your photos, this could be a clue to something wrong. Joey is smiling... his message is being heard. LEGISLATIVE UPDATE: The Infant Eye Care Bill, nicknamed "Joey's Bill", was written last year (2002) and heard in four committees. In the last two hearings the vote was unanimously in our favor. Representative Susan Bucher sponsored the bill in the House and Senator Ron Klein sponsored in the Senate. The bill numbers were HB 1117 SB 2062. This year (2003) the bill passed through the committees in which it was heard; but like last year, did not get to continue through the process to the floor. We will make it to the floor next session (2004) and "Joey's Bill" will pass... there is no reason not to do this for the children of our state. The bill sponsors were Rep. Susan Bucher and Senator Alex Villalobos. The bill numbers were HB 0115 SB 2174. The Bill is asking for the eye dilation exam before they leave the hospital, the 6 to 8 week well-baby exam and the 6 to 9 month well-baby exam. These three exams in the first six months of life will help ensure healthy vision for all of the children in our state. No child will loose an eye, go blind or die to a treatable eye disease again. Too many children have lost their vision needlessly and had their lives jeopardized this year alone because we are not doing the eye dilation exam. Healthy vision should be our children's birthright. Working tooether we will fix this for the children of our state and our country. For information, posters, presentations, and to HELP with this important cause; please contact me at the following: Pam Bergsma (Joey's grandma) loveioev@bellsouth.net 619 South K St. Lake Worth, FI. 33460 561-586-2094 www.loveioev.com www.Qeocities.com/loveuioev3 ·, "'" ....I ".Bascom PaInter EYE INSTITUTE University of Miami SCHOOL OF MEDICINE P.O. Box 016880 Miami, FL 33101 (305) 326·6000 Toll free in Florida (BOO) 329·7000 Florida State Legislature October 16,2001 REF: Newborn Eye Screening Program Proposal To Whom It May Concern: I appreciate the opportunity to discuss with you proposed new legislation to evaluate a Newborn Eye Screening Program for the State of Florida. I am currently the director of the Ocular Oncology Service at the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute I University of Miami-School of Medicine. This Ocular Oncology program is one of the largest existing in the United States and screens, treats and follows a large contingent of children with debilitating pediatric diseases, particularly· pediatric oncology problems focusing on Retinoblastoma. Retinoblastoma is the most common primary eye canç:er in children and affects approximately one in twelve thousand children born within the United States. This devastating childhood cancer and many other pediatric eye diseases can be more effectively screened utilizing a Newborn Eye Screening Program as discussed in this proposal. The focus of this proposal is a mandatory pupilary dilation of all newborns. and the establishment of an appropriate task force to advise the State Department of Health Services in the detection .of pediatric congenital and ocular abnormalities, and pediatric developmental ocular abnormalities that may lead to blindness, vision impairment or premature death for children in the State of Florida. Using Retinoblastoma as an example, this disease~ with early diagnosis is imminently treatable in such a way as to both save life and, with early treatment intervention, save the affected eye with usable sight. We suggest that dilation of pupils at birth, the 6-8 week well- baby exam and future well baby exams would significantly decrease the delay in recognition of a variety of ocular disorders that are both sight and life threatening. My colleagues and I feel that this legislation would be a first step towards enhancing the care of all children born in the State of Florida. We hope that this proposed legislation would be closely evaluated by you so that its benefit can be realized within a short future. On behalf of myself,.the Bascom Palmer Eye Institute and all children who will benefit from legislation such as this, pIe accept our gratitude for your time and attention to this matter'. Sincerely, Timothy G. Associate ofessor I Ophthalmology . Director Ocular Oncology Bascom Palmer Eye Institute University of Miami-School of Medicine V:ïl1ian1 L. McKnight \ï!õion Research Center! 16.:I,H N.W: 10 ,"'\Ienu~ Ann~ Bates Leach Ey~ Hospital 1900 N. v:: 1'7 5tr~et ~ ~ " ell............... .,.",.,.". --.. ,....,.. THE RETINOBLASTOMA CENTER rrn· -'~-~ REtlnoblastom. Intematlon.1 use UNIVERSITY OF SOlmIERN ëALlroiiÑÏÃ A Program of the Center for Cancer and Blood Disease Childrens Hospital Los Angeles February 6,2003 TO: To Whom It May Concern RE: Pending Legislation before the Florida Legislature related to Dilation ~f the Pupils of the Eyes During Well Child Examination for the Early Detection of Treatable Intraocular Pathology including Retinoblastoma and Cataracts To Whom It May Concern: This letter provides a strong endorsement of the efforts of parents, friends, the public and the legislature in Florida to consider and hopefully pass legislation which would have the effect of insuring that all primary care physicians and others who take care of well babies do what ever· is necessary during well baby care to detect and refer for treatment disorders inside the eye which can cause blindness unless treated. Specifically these are congenital cataracts and retinoblastoma. We were successful in 2000 of having a law passed in the State of California, which required the American Academy of Pediatrics to assure the members would receive guidelines, that would allow the detection of treatable causes of childhood blindness by age 2 months. The only practical way to do this is to dilate the pupil as part of the well child examination. This procedure is safe, it takes perhaps 30 seconds of the nurses time during the weigh in of the child, and requires the pediatrician or primary care physician to do nothing more then they are currently doing, use the direct ophthalmoscope to observe a "red eye" reflection after shining light on the eye. Detection of this, which is the same "red eye" seen in flash photographs, requires coaxial illumination such as a direct hand held ophthalmoscope present in every pediatrician's office. As part of the examination now, primary care doctor's do, in fact, do the "red reflex" test looking for retinoblastoma. However, because the pupil in an infant, baby or young child is always very small, the detection of any intraocular pathology is rare without pupil dilation. The pupil dilation of very small, premature infants has been routine because of the need to examine the retinas for retinopathy prematurity. Large national and international studies have detected no evidence of significant side effects with the use of dilating drops, even in the use of these very small, very sick, babies, most under 1000 grams at birth. The Retinoblastoma Center at Childrens Hospital Los Angeles · 4650 Sunset Boulevard, MS #88 · Los Angeles. California 90027 USA 'INWW. retinoblastoma. net facsimile 323 660.8541 't?1 1.I.~?'299 "" ..., The children at risk for congenital cataracts and retinoblastoma are well children who, for the most part, are normal size. The time that it takes to put the dilating drop in is perhaps 30 seconds of a nurse's time. The cost is less then ten cents but the adequate detection of intraocular pathology can in fact prevent blindness in these children. Retinoblastoma is rare, probably less then 1 in 10,000, but congenital cataracts, the other main cause of treatable intraocular pathology, are 10 times more common being seen as often as once in every 1000 children. At that level, this incidence compares with congenital heart disease and congenital dislocated hip, both of which are routinely screened for as part of the well child care. I want to commend the individuals in Florida, pushing for this legislation and strongly support on behalf of Retinoblastoma International, which I am medical director añd of.lhe Retinoblastoma Center at Childrens Hospital Los Angeies. .~. J A. Linn Murphree, M.D., Director The Retinoblastoma Center Childr-ens Hospital Los Angeles Professor, Ophthalmqlogy in Pediatrics Keck School of Medicine, use '-" ...., . ~ Texas Children's Hospital www.tcxaschildrcnshospital.org (11 ~til~~E OF 7+C~...uc.~o"'~~ ME 0 I Cl N E ..-.....-. ~.. David K. Cmlts. \I.D. kYcl\ 11".1,,,.1 ( ,'''''''' 1,,,nO'"'' 1\"""lIr' l'n,I,'''''''/ I" (),I/,/i,,,/,,,,./. ~'I Clini.:;¡IC;¡..,· C.:n\l:" hh21 hl11nin Sln:,¡ C(' h..IUK) HUII'lun. TX 771!.~O-2W" T.:I: X.~2IX22-.~2.~() 1':1 \: 7 1.~J7l)h·~ 110 February 13, 2003 Evelyn A. I'aysse. \I.n. 1\...',""11 ¡a,'II/t"\\f,r III ('/,/ul""",,,/, ~~1 ,",1"",/""'·'1 , Kil11l}l'rl~' (;. Yen. \I.n. I\\I\/.""/',.".-,,,,, III ()/"l1h.,I"",'...·, Florida Legislature Fax: (561) 966-7623 Dear Florida Legislators: I am writing in support of the Joey Bill, the infant eye screening bill in the State of Florida. This bill would legislate the need for a dilated eye examination with a direct ophthalmoscope for infants before leaving the hospital, at the six-week well child I examination and at the six-month well child examination. This would greatly increase the chances of detecting significant pathology, most importantly retinoblastoma but also cataract and any other media opacities. The addition of the dilating eye drop would not cause an increase in time or effort for the physician. It would merely entail instilling eye drops in the waiting room 30 minutes before the doctor's examination. Currently, the direct ophthalmoscope examination is done without dilation. This greatly hinders the ability to detect pathology, especially in the periphery ofthe eye where retinoblastoma often is. This eye screening bill could result in earlier detection of retinoblastoma and other blinding/life threatening disease hopefully at a time when it is still treatable. I urge you to support this bill and if you have any further questions, I would be happy to answer them. Please don't hesitate to call. Evelyn A. Paysse, M.D. Assistant Professor of Ophthalmology and Pediatrics EAP:mlt ...... CORNELL UNIVERSITY """"'" ~~~YORK 1- l~BYTERIAN HOSPITA~ Joan and Sanford I. Weill Meåical College Thorn.., C. 1M. M. D. A'$i.,lønt Pro!e5JCr ~$Oci<ltr Dirrctør, RDbrrl M. ElIsUlClrlh Ophtlllllmic Onenløgy Crnlt1 Drparl/!lÞlt of OphthAlmology DisraltJ and Surgery of t/lt Relinø and VitTrøw Ocular Onœlogy C. v. Starr P.viWon. Plf1 520 East 70th Street Telephone: 212746-4334 'Fax: 212 746-2UO ¡¡·rn..I/:Id2002Ozned.comtIJ.edu To: Susan Booker From: Thomas C. Lee, MD Department of Ophthalmology New York - Presbyterian Hospital Re: Infant Eye Screening House Bill 1 117 Senate Bi1l2062 February 25,2002 Dear Florida Legislature, The above bill is directed at early detection of a pediatric eye tumor called retinoblastoma. Unlike most other pediatric cancer, retinoblastoma has a very high cure rate as long as it is detected early in the eye. There are a number of states which are currently considering legislation to require that the standard eye exam done in a pediatrician's office include the use o( dilating eye drops to better facilitate detection with a standard ophthalmoscope. In addition, this test would be done at two examinations with the first being at 6-8 weeks and the second at 6·9 months. Early detection will not only improve chance for survival but it will also increase the chance for retaining vision. I fully support the bill above and hope that you wil1 give it serious consideration. s;:z: e---l Thomas C. Lee, MD San nalnon VaHey Prin\ary Care Medical Group Pediatrics Thomas F. Long. M.D. Tracy L. Trotter. M.D. Colleen M. Hogan, M.D. Allen D. Obrinsky, M.D. Tracy T. Trujillo, M.D. Internal Medicine Sue J. Knight, M.D. Jon C. Rasak. M.D. 200 Porter Drive Suite 300 San Ramon. CA 94583 hdiatrics 925.838.6511 Internal Medicine 925.838.6533 Administration 925.838.6500 Fax 925.838.6544 "wi April 24, 2002 Mrs. Pam Bergsma 619 South K Street Lake Worth, FL 33460 RE: Pediatric eve exams . Dear Mrs. Bergsma: I am primary çare pediatrician practicing in a suburban community in Northern California. We have a group comprised of 6 pediatricians and 3 pediatric nurse practitioners. We have been performing a dilated eye examine on every infant prior to 2 months of age since 1984. During the last 18 years and over 6300 infants we have had no side effects or adverse reactions and have diagnosed 3 infants with congenital cataracts prior to 8 weeks of age. The drops are instilled by the nurses when the infants are first brought into the exam rooms and by the time we complete our visit the eyes are well dilated and easy to examine. The ophthalmoscopic portion of the exam adds about 20-30 seconds to the visit. The babies are perfectly comfortable with this procedure and the parents are delighted with our careful approach to their child's health and welfare. . Although we have not had a child with retinoblastoma in our practice, we realize it is only a matter of time and remain vigilant. 1 only wish we had other simple, inexpensive and safe methods of s~rt::t:i1Ïng [or otht:f Jiseasès that have as rnu~h of a potential . devastating impact as loss of sight or loss of life. I wish you well in your campaign to educate all physicians providing care to infants about this sight-saving and life-saving procedure. Very truly yours, ~~'trJ~ Tracy L. Trotter, MD, F AAP Pediatric & Adolescent Medicine ~ ..." IH6 Foothi1\ ~oulevard Suite 2.0% La Canad., CA .9nol. (818) 79°-5583 ,Fax (818) 7.9°.9517 HuNTINGTON MEDICAL FOUNDATION At! affiliate of Southem Cdlifømia HtdlrhC4Fr SystcllU DESC~NSO PEDIATRICS Kathleen A. Smith, M.D. 1."ur;a E.. Mabie"M.D. Miry 1.. Doyle, M.D. Gregory S.. Uzer, MD. John G. Rodoru M.D. Florida. State L f.gisla.tuN Tallahassee, FlcJridn Re:Hous~Bil! 1117 Sena.te Bi\1 2062 . .. D~ar Sirs and Madams: 1 My !lam e is Laura Mabie an d I am a. £ell~ral pe~iatrrcian loe ated just outside Los Angel~$ California. My offieehas'l1een doing n dilated t.ye exa.m on all of cur 6-to8 week old'infants for tbe Jut eight y~nrs. M~I mcdicnl a~sista.nts pla.c~ the dilating dJ'ops into tht inIuJ'1t's eyes whilt. the baby is bÜng \'V·!igb~cL Th~ ph)'~icim~ tbe.n proce~ds with the regula.r e.xam, and does the ophthalmoscopic exam at the end. Thp. "extra," exam . takes less. than ten seçonds. The ba.bjes suffer no sic1e effects. They are not held down Ül any way. Often the exam is done with the bn.by in its motbE\r'~ arms.· " This exa111 issimple, e:a.sy, chea.p, and vtry cost-effective. \Vhile 1 have never dinSDo~~dn Ct1se ofr~tino'tll\1.stoma. r bave' pid:ed up thrH çnsu of cClnSl"-nitn\ catn.rncts that l1~edtcl to b~ trt\n.ted iuJtnedi3tely, 1 ,...·ould urge. your support of the abovl!! rueZ1tion~d bi11s. This çoulc\ easily save the ,~ight, ifnot tbe lives, ofbundreds of Florida's chi1dren. . Sincerely, . ~~'~~" 710 La.urn E. Mabje, M.D. FAAP .- ~ ,. !"P-;H ..." TiH<Â-L M,·;O.LO~G;Y BRAD D. SIMONS, MD, PHD, PA November 27lh, 2002 Re: Infant Eye Screening To whom it may concern: Retinoblastoma is the most common ocular malignant tumor of childhood and although it is not a common disease, It is disproportionately important becauseiits misdiagnosis is one of the few errors in the practice of ophthalmology that can lead to the death of a child. With early detection and modern treatment long-term survival rates are over 90%. Thus early detection and Intervention is the key. Even well trained pediatricians can have difficulty detecting an abnormal choroidal light reflex in an eye harboring a larger retinoblastoma. Nevertheless, It is important for pediatricians to continue to screen for any pupilary abnormalities throughout early childhood. Any reflex that appears abnormal should be referred to a pediatric ophthalmologist for a complete retinal examination. I hope that the proposed legislation is closely evaluated and given serious consideration. I thank you in advance for your assistance with this matter. Sincerely, ~br- Brad D. Cns, MD PhD Three Palms Center, Suite 210 2141 Alternate AlA South Jupiter, Florida 33477 P 561/747 4100 F 561/747 8821 www.braddsimons.com '-" Kevin Ho,..n5b~ MD 32183903,-, p.2 '. . Medical Associates, P.C. 430 W. Lawrence Harris Hwy. Slocomb, AL 36375 Phone: 334-886-9400 FAX: 334-886-3713 November 15,2002 Dear Legislators, 1 am a physician relocating my family to Celebration, Florida. I write this letter to stress to you the importance of eye exams for infants and children. Currently it is not required, nor is it routine for physicians to dilate infants eyes at birth or to perform eye exams with an ophthabnoscope. While most doctors check eyes at well child exams, without dilation of the eye it is impossible to see the retina clearly. A simple exam, which requires 10-15 seconds of a physician's time, can make the difference between sight and blindness for a child suffering from a visual affliction. While hearing screenings are gaining mandatory acceptance, vision screenings are ignored. I am asking you to support our cause and make a difference to a child. My two-year-old was diagnosed in November of2001 with retinoblastoma. Doctors had to remove his Tight eye and he underwent chemotherapy. Had my wife and I not had any medical training, his tumor would have gone undiagnosed, and he would have died. A simple dilated eye exam by the pediatrician would have perhaps saved his eye or at least partial vision. As many as 7000 children die every year from retinoblastoma and many more lose vision to cataracts or other eye related diseases. Vision is our most precious sense, and I believe all to often we take il for granted. Please, as a physician, but more emphatically as a father, 1 ask you to take the time to consider and act on this cause. You have a chance to make a huge difference in the quality of life for many children and set precedence for the rest of this great nation· don't let them down. Sl,~ 'i!_ . Kevin M. Hornsby, MD F.A.A.F.P. KMH!hh , ; \r . ....." . FlU ~ ~"W1CNAJ. VNlYØ:I%TY ~'.If*Duin November 5, 2001 Flonda State Leglslatur~ RE: Newborn Eye Screening program Froposa,1 To Whom It May Concern: The proposed Newbom Eye Screening Program for the State of Florida addresses a serious health concem ~ preventing blindness In fubJre generatjons of Floridians. As Dean of the College of Health a~d Urban Aff!lrs at Florida Intemationål UnIversity I recommend th, prOposed legislation. . ImplementatJon of this legislation will save the vision of hundreds 01 infants bom In Florida every year. Mor&over, It will do ~ in a cost-effective manner. One chUd In every 677 live births is affected with a treata~e eye dlsNse or anomaly that will cause blindness unleu detected early. The cost to the State in direct and Indireå costs for a blind child over the COUr1e of a lifetime is approximately 52 million. The cost of the proposed scrNning Is that for two drops of dnating solution and 10 seconds of a nurSe's time. Even when the cost! for education and oversight are C8lculeted. the eçonomlc benerM to the Sta1e are cvelWhelming. The benems to chiJdren and their families Is In~IÇ1Jable. , ' . , . For these reasons' urge you to consider the proposed legislation for the benefit of. all Floridians. . ~ Sincerety, ~.·~ê~ Ronald M. Berkman. Ph.D. Dean ,. . Cot1ep cl ~ aM om: AI!zJa Sè0ò1 ofHü . ~ cíNvni:Ic' SWoI orNJ:r Ie ~t · Sèa.Ml ol Sod.! "IrJ.tIr. UnM.'SÌ!TPaà. Campw, £CS 4SO. 11200 5."'. am Suw.. M"ui, 11. 33199 · 'Tel: ~~)4a.s"'o· ñr: ~M""'O t www,W,.du . . ,.-. '--i....... '-,.,. , . .. .... ~...,,¿....... ."....... ~ .~ ...., FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OP John O. Agwunobi, M.D~ M.8.A. :::.ecretary Jeb Bush Governor HEALT December 2,2002 Ms. Pam Bergsma 619 South K Street Lake Worth, F1. 33460 561-586-2094 Dear Ms. Bergsma: lam writing this letter in support of the Infant Eye Screening Bill and urge the Florida Legislators ·to do whatever possible to see that this bill gets passed in the 2003 session. The eye dilation examinations in the beginning of life are vital to the health and welfare of our children. The ophthalmoscope is to be used for the eyes in a darkened room at every examination; the same way the pediatrician uses the stethoscope at every examination. In infancy, the pupil of the eye is small in diameter, therefore an eye dilation drop needs to be added in order for the ophthalmoscope to detect tumors and cataracts developing in the eyes. The drops cost pennies and will add only seconds of time to the well baby examination. One in every 677 live births has a treatable eye disease. Early detection and referral is the key to saving the vision and, in the case of retinoblastoma, lives of these children. The Infant Eye Care Bill will help to ensure healthy vision and life for the children of the state of Florida. ~ ~/~ ~/'''''- .72 __-- J n ~lecki, Mn, MP , ACPM Director Palm Beach County Health Department Palm Beach County Health Department P.O. Box 29, 826 Evernia St., West Palm Beach, FL 33402 ..... ....",J Pam Bergsma 619 South K St. Lake Worth, Florida 33460 561-586-2094 loveioev~bellsouth.net Dear Pam Bergsma, Let it be known to the Florida Legislators that I, (print name and profession) of (print full address) on this day, (date) support the Infant Eye Care Bill nicknamed "Joey's Bill", and urge the Florida Legislators to do whatever possible to see that this bill gets passed in the 2004 session. The eye dilation exams in the beginning of life are vital to the health and welfare of the children of our state. According to FlU, one in every 677 live births has a treatable eye disease that will blind if not detected and treated. Plus, one in every 12,000 children in the United States is affected with retinoblastoma which; as in Joey's case, ·will kill ü not detected and allowed to escape the eye. Too many of our children are at risk to blindness and in the case of retinoblastoma, death. Every child born has the right to healthy vision and life. This legislation will help to i' ensure that right. . Thank You for Your Attention, (signature) Phone: Email: V\ ".'" f í1 - ("J ') ~ po f.J) - ~ -; \,/':' It c- ,+-. ~ ~ - ¡;;¡. ...,- ,.. .,-- ....q:= >0< ~~ "'= ~o ~~ ,. tTO > c: n ~ (1 0' S ~ S ~ I/> ~ ~ S ~ ~ ~ ca ¡¡; g~. ~ ~ !ij' Q õ ~;: ¡ç i g~. ð' (6 ~ ~ ~ g ii!.g ~~':!1~' ~-;. ~ i ~ ~ i ~ g''iš ~ ......, ~~ ~~::,Q.(1 0 a ~ =SÐ ª-¡g I/> ~ . .§ ~ ~ g.¡¡;: 0 ....t'" g ~ ¡¡ ~.~ 9' g E::ª' ~" ;i § ~ S' = ~ § ii! ~ ~ S' Q¡ Fij' ~ '& §::; ~ E ;. 0 9 ~ ~ (1~. ~ ~ g fij ::¡. gOQ . I\) i~ .p:I. ~::r 11:1 _!þ (þ ; > /II "0 ¡j! 0 ~::!1 == ~ ::;t .e 0 ....::r 0' § œ. c::. == ~ (þ r-' "0 ~.., ~ (I) 0' ~ g .., 0'< VI" . ëiI ê:: c¡ ;:I æ..t" ¡;¡. ~'< 1:1....... ª' .., p" to: ..... = n ~ (I) ::1. e. i.... :;1."0 ~ œ I\) c:: ; p:I ~ Q. g &. g .., ~ = ~ = ~ ¡r (þ g¡ ~ "0: 8 i go ~ ~: ~ è:t. it s: ~ ª ~ ~ 8 ~ S' p:I I\) 1t ~ ~ lie. § · it o:! ii '< er ~ /II § ii § ~ (;! "0 "::3 g ~ a ;' ¡¡;' § S' i 0 Fij' a i''< "é ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ª ~ ~ '€. ~ g''S.~ i ~ ~ ~ Ž. a ~ 8. ~ ~ ª § g;, s. ä g § ~ ¡;¡'-g.J:1r=.0'ii! I/>....§ =r~e.~š-<c;: :!1~aq n I ~~ o:! g ~ ~ ~ ~ 8,n .g ~. ~ i ~~ g ~ g..g ~ ~ ¡¡;. ~ § ~ S. ª ~ ~ i ~ s·.~ aq trJ c; "0 "0 I\) (þ ::r ~ (") .... ~ "0 I/> :;::. tr:I. g ~ ~. 0 ~ a .~ c:: S ~ ~ ~ § .m m ä S' s. go = S ~ ~ :I: g S ~ ~ s: ~~ ~ \X ~ ;:I ~ g ~ g' å ~~ õ' tIJ ~ ä ~ &. g. ~ ~.; ~ ~. g ~ ~ i ~'ýJ ~ ~ i ~ ~ 9 S: ïp i=' ïp g~~' ~ [ ?. ~~ ; : -\ C rt V" 1"\ ,- 1"\ ,.. ¡$:. """"..........'""""' I\)~=-::r = ~ I\) .., :;~.;~ ~ I\) ~ 0 ~ =-~¡:¡ =-~~I\) ~ "0 ::1.~' ~§:¡::.=o ....~¡¡:tIJ oP¡.=" 00 :::IH/:J .... ~ ~ 0:9. g (b 0" <: :: ~ s: ('þ ~ ,.. =- 0' ('þ (,I) .... (D == 0~Õ'0' -=-~ P¡ ~('þ(1)0' (þ=PI'<,. "- § (") . I\) =- :5. 6. 9' š: ~ 00""'> ...:::-0 ..... ....-(þ-. ~ß ~, ttlcO"O '< -. ttI :1:1 ¡Ð ~. õ' " Þ :J -- .. ." 1.0 ttI "1:J "0 ttI ell ell :T~ 11'3 ~3~t:J:I .!(, -. ell ~ l:1l:I ::I ....1.0 ..~(þ", C -.,., 3 Q g 30 ell l:1l:I'" -0 ii! õ' 2. ib :e .... ....-0 111 1"\ ¡;j ell .. Cù: (1) ..., ~ 0 ~ (þ ::J .... .... ell 0 -:~ er-g ¡; g ~ ø.: [ ~ t;. Q ~ § ~ ~ g. Q t;. ~ ~ 8. "O.g S' I\) = ¡:? ;¡ (;! g ~ õ. ~aq g . ~ (;! ~ 0 ~ g ~..s ~ ~ t:C ë6 o.g ; ~ ~ "0 OQ o~. ~.! gãp:~~ ~¡~~ ~g~P~ ~ ~ @ Q F~~ [~,.II>~g,~ ~ g,;,¡:? c:: ""I S tr:I . = 0' (þ e. j¡ I\) "C ::t S " . s "~. tIJ (fþ ~ P¡ '"'.g /II (þ ¡::;., 11:~ a~ I ~~!~ iU~ ~ ~~~ 'hi~h ~'~n~ t::: so '" 0 ;;> 0 .... ~ :>< .... ~ .... ;4 tIJ g.;i ~..... - 0" W .., tIJ !i\~' S 0' ""Ì" ~ ~:~~¡i !E!!~tE-g~~~1 11~;§ªsª.~~f; i~~if~ ii~.c:Jog~~~~¡ ~I~~~i~i!!W§ n~(þo~= :!1~="Oo=~~~(þS~ ....'"' ~(þO ~....\J=~ gis~i~ §~~"O~=!0~1~~ ~; ~q~ O"~~¡:?~ s: tIJ õ:.~ 0' ~ ~ ~ ttI ~ '2 ¡] ~ 8. ! S g¡ ¡; õ' 1\)::;: ~ ~ c:: ~ (þ ~ E;- O::r P¡ 0 (") ~) ~."O Q I\) er. 0 ïS.... "0.., [ ~ 0(") !'2 = 0 if (þocrq ~~ "é 1\)...,. 000'< ...". .... V'I\) ;£[t¡]: &.~~~iir~~~~~ ~! <;.ª ~~~I ""I ~ I\) 0...· ....J-'....,.... ~ 0' n ~ .., /II - 0 ~ e - S == F i 8 g ~ i ~ g ;- g §' s: [ S' ~ § ~ ~ §. ; ii! g § g g ~ I ~ (;! '9 ,g (").~ ~,.II> ~ i?- ~ ~ (þ S' /II =¡:: S' 1/>" ~ OQ tIJ (þ I :P- Q .., ,... -- )Q ¡J - >u (j ") W ~ª'~ ~~i\r N¡;;';¡:: ~® S2. ~~~ ,¡:,.;:3(') . ~ § ::sO' ¡:r.(\) ~~ :-¡:¡ 8 (') 3[ 0,", ...::\. "0 g::r..... trJ tr:I g ª" ~ . "0 9 E tIJ ~ ~ i...· ~.... § "0 a '< Fij' § · i ~ ~ 5' ~ s ~t ~ g g t:C ~ ~ = ;, ~.PI g 'T ~ ii3 i~n~[~H~h H~~~ ~H ¡¡ ~!~U ~(")~ß'~"Oa.St~<(;! ~(")~2'~S....g~ooE;-~~ e:~. 0 ~ '< a i;-' ~ ~ ~. ~ 0 ~ S' 0 ¡¡¡ = t:C e:....0'CI. .... ~ Fñ Ë. E g 8 p¡; ~ ~ ~'< ~ ~ g. g a~ ~ g. ~ g g' £ij ~ g ~~ ~ ~. g So ~ i~ å ~ ¡ ~ ~~. ~ ~ ~03 ~ ~ ~ii~jl~~ ~~~ l~~~ ~~~~~~i 1 ~$..... ~ 9:1' ~.;. ª~.~. g' ~ § ~9: s- ~ '< 8 cf& g g S' . . o. ~ ~ (þ .!ii 0...· ....::r = aq a. ~ ::3 ~"- aq '" ::r' .:- Q."" !ii' ~ ... .... ",,' w c.... VI ::r (þ...... :t g: aq ~ = ::r _ _ 0 = ~ I\) ... o::r <. (þ_ .... .~_ ~ (þw¥ ~('þ !ii I/> "0 ~ 9. .., - ~ œ § (") ~ =1' ~ Š. ii! s: '< VI õ' ~ 0 ~ ~ Q;' ~ ~ ~ P¡::r 5" ~ t:::i ~ tIJ o:! ::r = ~;.ge: ~ii! ('þ~f ;sß'§ ~~-~ ~~ õ ...; ~ :1: S ~ .11> =,: S' ~ ~ r+ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e. o¡¡ Q. ~ / ...,J 6(¡ § i "" - ~ ~! ~ Õ \! = i j '\,Ø \. J r:I'J II ¡ \. .Q.. 1\ (þq ,,~ :1 ª' \1 II ~\I ~\\ r:I'J II ~ II al !~ {I:J i (þ ~ 1\ II II 1\ - ~ ...¡ .... AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. ;;;ß DATE: January 6, 2004 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 04-27 - Proclaiming January 6,2004 as "Eddie Enns Day" in St. Lucie County, Florida. BACKGROUND: After eight years as Mayor for the City of Fort Pierce, Florida, and twelve years as County Commissioner for St. Lucie County, Florida, Mr. Eddie Enns has closed his political career. The attached Resolution No. 04-27 has been drafted for that purpose. FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 04-27 as drafted. ~ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 CE: COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney: k Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing Originating Dept. Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Eff. 5/96 " '--" ..." ~ "\ RESOLUTION NO. 04-27 A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING JANUARY 6, 2004, AS "EDDIE ENNS DAY" IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. After eight years as Mayor for the City of Fort Pierce, Florida, the Honorable Eddie Enns has closed his political career. 2. Prior to being Mayor for the City of Fort Pierce, Eddie Enns served on the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County for nearly twelve years commencing in January of 1971 and extending to November of 1982. 3. Mr. Enns is married to Diane, they have four children Stephen, Gladwin, Mary Margaret, and Susannah; and five grandsons. 4. Eddie Enns graduated from the University of Florida with a Bachelors of Science Degree in Business Administration; is a Veteran of the U. S. Army and a native of St. Lucie County. 5. Through hard work, dedication, and an honest passion for the City of Fort Pierce, Eddie Enns achieved his greatest accomplishment as Mayor, by successfully redeveloping the City of Fort Pierce. 6. During his nearly twelve years as County Commissioner for St. Lucie County, Eddie Enns devoted his efforts untiringly to serving the people of St. Lucie County, and to fostering numerous projects for the betterment of the public. " ~ ..., 7. The other members of the Board of County Commissioners appreciated the keen wit and intellectual leadership which Mr. Enns brought to his office. 8. This Board believes that dedication such as that demonstrated by Eddie Enns, as Mayor of the City of Fort Pierce, and Commissioner for St. Lucie County should be acknowledged. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board does hereby proclaim January 6, 2004, as "EDDIE ENNS DAY" in St. Lucie County, Florida. 2. This Board does hereby further congratulate Mr. Eddie Enns on a job well done. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 6th day of January, 2004. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ~ AGENDA REQUEST IT'tM NO. 5A DA TE: January 6, 2004 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [XX] CONSENT [ ] PRESENTED BY: ~-þ. 'Michael POWley,~ County Engineer SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): ENGINEERING DEPT SUBJECT: Sunland Gardens M. S. B. U (Phase 1) Second Public Hearing Potable Water Improvements - FPUA BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAIL. (State type & No. of transaction or N/A): N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: March 12, 2002 - Board accepted the petition and granted permission to advertise the Initial Public Hearing. April 16, 2002 - Initial Public Hearing held. Board created MSBU and authorized County Engineer to proceed with project. December 9, 2003 - Board granted permission to advertise the Second Public Hearing RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 03-323 to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the Sunland Gardens Municipal Services Benefit Unit; approve the attached preliminary assessment roll; approve the expanded MSBU boundary; and authorize staff to proceed with construction of the project. COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 NCE: ... Dou sAnderson County Administrator [x]County Attorney [XJPUb¡;'W~ ~\\. [x]Finance \ ~ ;v Coordination/Sianatures [x ]Co. Eng MvP [X}MSBUc~ [x]Mgt. & Budget 2æ.f} f119 [ ]Utilities: [ ]Purchasing '-' ..." COMMISSION REVIEW: January 6, 2004 ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM NO. 03-226 TO: FROM: DA TE: SUBJECT: Board of County Commissioners Michael Powley, County Engineer ¡uvþ December 4, 2003 Sunland Gardens MSBU (Phase 1) Potable Water Improvements - FPUA BACKGROUND Residents in Sunland Gardens petitioned St. Lucie County to create an MSBU to provide potable water improvements to the entire Sunland Gardens Subdivision. At the time, there was not adequate support to proceed with the project for the entire Sunland Gardens neighborhood. However, a smaller section of the neighborhood had 46% in favor, with consistent persuasion from the residents, and due to health concerns, the Board created the Sunland Gardens MSBU (Phase I) on April 16, 2002 and authorized staff to proceed with engineering design services. Meanwhile, the residents within the remaining area of Sunland Gardens (Phase /I area) continued to gain additional support in anticipation of a MSBU for their area at a later date. Also, additional petitions have been submitted and staff will discuss this issue with the Board at a later date. Upon completion of the engineering design, it became apparent that some additional properties would gain benefit from the improvements. The subject property owners were informed that their properties would be subject to an assessment, and to date, we have received no opposition. On November :rd , the property owners were notified by mail of their tentative assessment and that the Second Informal Meeting would be held on November 19th to discuss the project. County staff and FPUA representatives were on hand to discuss the construction design, method of assessment and tentative cost, deed restrictions, SHIP funding, and to address questions and comments. The method of assessment for this project is based upon the "Equivalent Residential Connection" (ERC) method, which means an equal charge per residential connection. The total assessment levied is $1,031,530.64, excluding interest, tax collector and property appraiser fees. The assessment amount per ERC is $3,799.38. The Project would be financed for a period of fifteen (15) years, beginning in November, 2004. The attached Preliminary Assessment Roll is based upon the "maximum" number of ERCs that may be assessed against each parcel. However, over the next few months, property owners will have the ability to file deed restrictions to reserve fewer ERCs. In June, staff will present the Board with an "amended" Preliminary Assessment Roll, reflecting all adjusted ERC reservations. Upon completion of the project, a Final Assessment Roll will be adopted representing the final project cost. ~ ...", Additionally, SHIP funding will be made available for homeowners that qualify (on a first-come first- serve basis) to pay 50% of the subject assessment. Applications are currently being accepted. In the event the Project is not ultimately approved and constructed, the cost of preparing the plans, specifications, bond validation proceedings, and cost estimates may be assessed against the affected property owners within the Sunland Gardens MSBU. RECOMMENDA TlON Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 03-323 to levy a non-ad valorem special assessment on the Sunland Gardens Municipal Services Benefit Unit; approve the attached preliminary assessment roll; approve the expanded MSBU boundary; and authorize staff to proceed with construction of the project. cc: Staff Concurring Community Services Director Linda Smith, Tax Collector, Supr/Data Base Adm Evelyn Haskell, Property Appraiser, Director Tax Roll Preparation ~ ..".¡ RESOLUTION NO. 03-323 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; DETERMINING THAT THE PROPOSED SPECIAL ASSESSMENTS FOR THE SUNLAND GARDENS MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT TO FUND THE COST OF A PROJECT TO PROVIDE POTABLE WATER IMPROVEMENTS TO PROPERTIES WITHIN THE SUNLAND GARDENS MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT ARE JUST AND RIGHT; APPROVING AND CONFIRMING THE PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL BASED ON THE EQUIVALENT RESIDENTIAL CONNECTION METHOD OF ASSESSMENT; LEVYING A NON-AD VALOREM SPECIAL ASSESSMENT ON THE REAL PROPERTY WITHIN THE SUN LAND GARDENS MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT BASED ON THE APPROVED ROLL; AUTHORIZING COLLECTION OF THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT BY THE UNIFORM METHOD OF COLLECTION; APPROVING THE EXPANDED SUNLAND GARDENS MUNICIPAL SERVICES BENEFIT UNIT; AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING TO PROCEED WITH THE PROJECT AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, on April 16, 2002, based on the petition offorty-six (46%) percent ofthe landowners pursuant to Chapter 1-13.5 of the S1. Lucie County Code of Ordinances (the "Code"), the Board of County Commissioners for S1. Lucie County (the "Board") adopted Resolution No. 02-098 which created the Sunland Gardens Municipal Services Benefit Unit (the "Sunland Gardens MSBU") to levy non-ad valorem special assessments based on the equivalent residential connection method of assessment to fund the cost of a project to provide potable water improvements to properties within the boundaries of the Sunland Gardens MSBU in unincorporated S1. Lucie County, Florida (the "Project"), and authorized the S1. Lucie County Director of Engineering (the "County Engineer") to proceed with the Project pursuant to the procedures set forth in Section 1-13.5 of the Code; and WHEREAS, on January 6, 2004 pursuant to Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code and Chapter 125 and Section 197.3632, Florida Statutes, the Board held a duly noticed and advertised second public hearing to consider propriety and advisability of the Project and to act as an equalizing board to consider the comments of affected land owners and other interested persons concerning the preliminary assessment roll and expanded boundaries for the Sunland Gardens MSBU, proof of publication of the public hearing is attached as Exhibit "A"; and -1- '-" ~ WHEREAS, after considering the comments of all interested persons, the Board has determined that the special assessments as set forth on the preliminary assessment roll for the Sun land Gardens MSBU, attached hereto as Exhibit "B", are just and equitable; and the boundaries of the Sunland Gardens MSBU shall be expanded to reflect all properties benefitting from the potable water improvements, as shown on the attached Exhibit "C". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, as follows: Section 1: The expanded boundaries of the Sunland Gardens MSBU which include the real property to be specially assessed to fund the cost of the Project is hereby approved as shown on the attached Exhibit "C". Section 2: The Project to be funded by a non-ad valorem special assessment levied by the Sun land Gardens MSBU is to provide potable water improvements to properties within the Sunland Gardens MSBU in unincorporated St. Lucie County, Florida. Section 3: The method of assessment for the potable water improvements shall be based on the equivalent residential connection method of assessment such that each property within the Sunland Gardens MSBU shall share equally in the cost of the potable water improvements and that the amount of the assessment does not exceed the benefit to the properties derived from the improvements. Section 4: The preliminary assessment roll (Exhibit "B") for the Sun land Gardens MSBU is hereby approved and confirmed and the assessment shall stand as a lien against the benefitted properties until satisfied. Section 5: A non-ad valorem special assessment (the "Special Assessment") in the total estimated amount of $1,802,137.74 which includes interest, two (2%) percent tax collector fees and four (4%) percent for early payment discount, to fund the Project as shown on the plans and specifications prepared by the County is hereby levied on the real property within the Sunland Gardens MSBU (Exhibit "C") in the amounts set forth on the preliminary assessment roll attached as Exhibit "B". Section 6: The Special Assessment shall be collected by the uniform method of collection pursuant to Sections 197.3632 and 197.3635, Florida Statutes, as authorized by Chapter 1-13.5 of the Code beginning in November 2004 for a period of fifteen (15) years. Section 7: The County Engineer is authorized to continue with the Project. Section 8: Upon the completion of Project, the County Engineer shall report the actual cost to the Board, and the Board shall confirm a final assessment roll with such adjustments as may be necessary in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 1-13.5 of -2- '-" """ the Code. Section 9. This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption. After motion and second, the vote on this Resolution was as follows: Chair Paula Lewis XXX Vice Chairman John Bruhn XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 6th day of January, 2004. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: County Attorney -3- ~ ...., EXHIBIT "A" PROOF OF PUBLICATION -4- ~ EXHIBIT "B" PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT ROLL -5- "'" W~WWWWNNNN~NNNNN~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~WN~ ~~WN~O~~~~~~WN~O~~~~~~WN~O """"fJ o ~ . ~ r- .... cø . z 1 w ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ 2 2 2 ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & & ~ & & ~ & & ~ & & & & & & & & & & ~ & ~ & & & & ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~26~~~~~~~~~~~Ç5~~~~~~ z ;g ~~~~~~t~~~~~~~~~~~~§§~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ g888888888888888888è88~8888~8888888 ~õ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~8~~~~~~~~~~~~~8~~~~8~~~8 ~~~~~ ()(j)C/))J~ ~ $I) .-1 I:: C/) ... ::E v. :<;nr:=~~ ~ ~ ffi ITl f: r-~ oñi s;; <.. \J - ~~I1o~r- "71 ~ ~ )J 110 )J!;!1 )J !! ~ ñi ~ )J ~"71 Þ c: CD ~ :2: (j) ~ ê ~ :s ~ !:j; <.. )J . .<: ñi ~ CD .~ f: ~ õ þ S;»~ )J"iìì() o C/) '--,;j º o r- \J :z: § C/) ° <: »~~~~0!t:01Tl ~ ~ r- r- r- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~.~~~~~~ ~.o p:q!:! _)J f: 0 ~ ~~§i;§i;~S;þp] (j)o:Z::Z:\Jð~~):> ITlQI1011o0<:()C/)~ "'»»:Z::S 1Tl", <: <: !¡¡ r- <:)J <:~"'~ þ ñi '" () "71 110 '--'-- 'B !!J~ ~ õ S; """ þ :z: <:)J ~ ° ~ ° .e ~~'--~\J<::Z: c:c:QC:)JITlQ !!J !!J :.2: !!J m d .v r-r-C/)r-c:C/)~ ~~~~.:J!;2.Ñ ~~~~sñ1~ C/)C/)~C/)~~<:: :::J:::Jcn:::Jo)J11í ~~<:~)J~<: ()()I1o() C/)~ 0000 :2: ~~þ~ () '*-*'~~ ~ ~ :z: ~ c: c: c: !!J!!J !!J r- r- r- ~ ~ ~ :2: ~ ~ OtJ v ~ ~ ~ ;¡j;¡j ;¡j ñi ñi .1TlC/)- $I) .C/) :2: ~ :2: ,...,... ,... C/) C/) ;n ~ 880)J ~ ~ š1! ~ ~~~.fQ C/)C/)õ;¡j -I-I;J:~ » » :s () ¡:J ¡:J ITl .,. »»r-s;; <:<:~¡!1 :::J:::J ITl ()()0C/) ()()o'-- ° ° ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~f!1 \J ~ ~;<: þ '-- <: ° () :z: p <: '-- r ° ~ "71 110 );! ~ -< r- ~ Q C/) S; )Je¡ ~. §I ~ ~ ~ r- C/) ~ !;2 ;¡j :2: () !t: !t: ~ ~ ~ ~ _ Q ITl .<: .<: .fQ ::E ::E ;¡j r::¡::::~ r- r- () ñiñi~ '--'--)J 11011or- CDCDm ~ ° '-- CD CD _ CD ITl ñi '--,-- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o 0 ceo 0 coo ceo 0 N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 w ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ~ ceo C ~_N o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 -I>. 0 I\) 0 ~ 0 0 ~ ~ VJ 0 I\) I\) I\) ~ ~ -I>. ~ 0 0 0 0 "fJ ;:a o "fJ zm i: ~ m 0 ~ z m ;:a !G~d ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ .VJ 5-> .VJ .VJ 5-> VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ 00000000000 VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ 00000000000 ~~~~~~~~~~~ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I\) ~.~ 8!==>ò,o,~ !==> 8 ~ d! !" -I>. .. ~ 0'1 g ~ ..... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~5->~0~~~~~~~~~~~~0~~ n ~~~VJOI~0ëbl\)l\)o........~~VJVJ~~~ 0 ~~~!==>""~~I\). è:jè:jR¡~~~~!==>!==>!==>:-,~VI ..... ....-I>.~O .,. 0101' . -I>.-I>.~VJ -I ~~~0I0I~~~~~:;300~R¡0I0I~-I>. VI n ~ ~ !C ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ d!d!d!d!d!d!d!d!d!d!~, d!~ popo~popo~~po~~~poo ~~~~~~~~~~~~8 ~ ~ ~ VJ -I>. I\) 'N~o ~ 01 ~ o ~ .... N 0:, ~ ~ 0 ~ ~~~~~~~~ .VJ .VJ 5-> .VJ .VJ 5-> 5-> .VJ ;cj ;cj ;cj ;cj ;cj ;cj ;cj ;cj ~~«:>~~~~~ WWWWWWWW ~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ 'fA'69'6i9~ ......1\)..... 5-> .VJ 5-> 5-> .~.I\) ~ ;cj ;cj ;cj ;cj ~ Õ 8 ~ ~«:>~~!==>~~-I>. wWWVJowww ~~~~o~~o ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~ ~~~~t;j~~t;jt;j~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ è:j ~ ~ ~ ~ VJ VJ VJ Q,Q,Q, t;j t;j t;j w w w ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ 5-> .VJ .VJ .VJ .VJ ~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 01 01 01 01 01 wwwww ~~~~~ ~ ~ VJ VJ Q,Q, t;j t;j w w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '69'69 ......1'\)............ 5->5-> ~I\)OO ~~ ~~o,o ~~~~:::!~t;j ¡'¡¡'¡8~~~~ !Z~69~!Z'69~'69~~'69~ '6969'69 0'1 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 01 01 ~ 01 01 01 ~ ~ 01 ~ !==> ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ...þ". ...þ". ",..þ". 000 VJ VJ VJ !==> !==> !==> VJ VJ VJ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ -I>. -I>. -I>. -I>. -I>. 00000 VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ 00000 wwwww co ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ 00 VJ VJ o 0 W W ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~ ~~cë 88~~~~~ !==> !==> !==> ~ ~ I\) ~ ~~8~~~~ ~~ .VJ 5-> o 0 ~ ~ C C 01 01 ~~~~~~~~~~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~~~ .VJ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ë N ~~~~~g~~~~8~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~ -I>. -I>. -I>. -I>. -I>. -I>. -I>. -I>. -I>. -I>. -I>. _ ~ !" !" !" !" !" I\) !" !" !" !" I\) I\) !==> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~~~~ ~ N ~ ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ VJ !==> N 0, ~ 01 ~ ~ -I>. -I>. ~ ~ I\) VJ .~ ~ ~ po :1 ~~~~~~~~~~~~ .~ .~ .~ 9> 9> 9> .~ 9> .~ 9> 9> 9> ~~~~~~~~~~~~ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ VJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !==> ~ o ~ o ~ ~ ~~!: ~ io'Nio~Q, ~~~~~ ~~~COO) I\) ~ I\) VJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -1::1. r'\) ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I\) ~ ~ I\) ~ ~~~ ~ioQ, ~ ~ OJ ~ OJ ~ ~ ~ ~ VJ~OI ".....¡ioQ, ~ ~ I\) ~ ~ VJ W 0, C ~ VJ ~ ~ ~ .'" .... 0 ~ ~ ~ po 01 0 ~ I\) ~~~~~~ .N..'-I..~..~..O'J",""'¡~ ~R¡~~~~d! O~~~OI~po ~:.....~~~~~ I\)~OIOI«:>~VJ ~ ~ I\) I\) .~ 1'> VJ ~ I\) «:> ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .... .... VJ .-1>..-1>. .~ .... .... ~ VJVJ~ VJ VJ «:> ~ ~ 0:, ~ ~ .... ~ ~ ~~VJVJ 50 co -4 0) -I>.~WO r'\) r'\) C -4 I\) I\) ~ ~ ~ ~ 0:, C OIOI~~ ~ ~ ..... d! ~ po ~ ~ ~ VJ ~ ~~~ 5-> .VJ .~ ;cj ;cj ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~§ ~~ ~..þ".r'\)r'\)'-I~-4O'J~~~-4r'\) ~t;j;cj~~~~~~~~~ot;j~~~ 01 ~ W ~ 01 ~ ~ ~ 0:, ~ ~ .... w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ VJ ~ ~ VJ ~ ~ 0 01 01 -I>. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ë~ _~ .0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ;cj ~ ~ ~ ~ 5-> .~ .01 co ~ t:i t;j ~ 01 W ~ 0, ~ ~ -I>. ~~~~~ '6'>~ ~ r'\)r'\).....~W'69~WW'69'69'69..... O)W.þ"..þ".co<c~.....O)ww.......¡..... Q,'N~~~o,Q,«:>".....¡Q,Q,t;jo, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ õ õ ~ ~ t;j t;j !==> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ è:j g ~ ~ .-1>. .... I\) o ~ ~ ~ o ~ -I>. 01 ~ ~ ..... I\) 0 ~ ~ ~ N I\) 01 ~~~ o 01 ~ VJ 01 01 ~ ~ ~ ~~ :::~~ 'N-I>.O ~ OJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 01 ~ ;;! o ~ ~ 01 ~ '69 "'~ '69 01 01 VJ ~ VJ ~ !J> ~ ~ ~ ~ -I>. ~~~~~ '69'69r'\)r'\)~~w~ ~OI~-I>.-I>.-I>.~«:> ~~~~~~~~ .......þ".O~ww~~ ~~o,I\)CCWW <Co)N'-I~~~..þ". ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~ .01 .~ -I>. 0 VJ 0 OVJ-I>.VJ ~ !J> ='" !J> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5-> .~ .-1>. o I\) 01 <Q ~ ~ ;-L ~ :1:1.. o ~ ~ 01 ~ ~ ~ "'~ ~ I\) .... .... 01 ~ !==> ~ ~ ~ ~ "'~ ~ ~ ~ o VJ .... VJ ~ ~ ~ ~~w'69'64 ..~.........0.:"'J ","""'J -I>. -I>. ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~~VJOIOI ~~~~~ ~ ~ '69 =-'" ..~ VJ I\) -I>. ~ ~ ~ -I>. ~ «:> t ~ ~ ~ ~ ~VJVJ .~ So> ~ ~ I\) I\) ~ .... 0 ~ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '69 "'~ '69 -I>. 0 ~ -I>. -I>. 01 I\) -I>. -I>. 0, W ~ .... VJ I\) ~~~~~~~~~ W N ~ ~ .þ". ~ ~ w ~ OQ,Q,~wooo,-"'" ~ 01 -I>. -I>. ~ ~ ~ -I>. ~ ~ 01 ~ ~ «:> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ .... .... ~ .~ o I\) 01 01 -I>. ~ 0, C ~ -I>. ~ ~~fA~'69~~ 5-> .~ 9> .01 .~ 91 !O ~~~~~~~ ~po~-I>.VJ~!J> ~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ I\) I\) ~ -I>. -I>. 01 o,Q,Q, ~ ~ -I>. I\) I\) ~ N N C ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~ ~~o,«:> ~ ~ ~ I\) ~ ~ ~ ~ o,o,:.....~ r'\) N ~ '-I ~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ()) 01 ~ !==> ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~~~ 000 VJVJ~ 000 w w ~ ..... ~~~VJ ~ ~ I\) I\) 01 ~ ~w ~ 0 o VJ N N «:> 0 ~~ 00 ~ ~ ~~:::~ ~~ -I>. -I>. !" !" 01 01 .... .... fAfA~~ .?> .?> ..w!c ...ar. 0') 0') N co ...ar. W W '-I ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ """'J '-I ..þ". ..... ~ ~ N I'\) ~ ~ ~~:§ ~ ~ !" ~ ~ ~ fA "'...... ...ar. Coc.."S ~ I\) ~ ~ o 01 VJ -I>. ~ t:~ o !J> ;cj "T\ "T\ Z m iii mo VI z c ~ :: ~ w ~ po ~ ~ Ci! ~,,. :z.~, ,~'::,v,J, ~.~~ ~. ~ "T\ m m C -I (ijO :3 § ~ ~ !( ~ ..~ § o ~ :-' ~ ;g VI m m r- VI 3ë ~ Z ~ ~ ~ ~ VI n g¡ 0 VIe: !C z m -I z m -I C "fJ ~ ~ !C z m e: z~ -I "fJ ~ d ~ ~ -I VI ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~wwww C~~~~~~WN~C~~~~~~WN~C~~~~~~WN~C~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 8§88~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~-I.9~~~~~~~~~~?~~~~~~ 88888888888888888888 ~~~~~~~~~~~~8~~~~~~~ '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" 00000000 ~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~ 66666666 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 ~~;p~~~~~ 88888888 ~~8~~~~~ ~~~~~ 00000 ~~~~~ ~~~~~ 66666 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 ?~~~~ 88888 ~~8~~ ~ ~ o 0 9" Cf1 ~ ê z 66 c-l C11 C11 _ !I: ~ ~ ~ ... IJ 6 8 8 ~ ~~ ~~~~~~~~ ... t::J ...... i3 h; ;;:: ;;:: rT1 ::<:<:<:Ci)¡::::(X<: ~~~~è-,dJTi·-I $i) èn èn èn ~ .<: » :B ~~~~f!1::o5gj ::0 ,.... ,.... ,.... ìii g ~ Q ~~~~Qo~orT1 -I::O::O::OfE-I-I:3 ,.... 0 0 0 c:'" ::0 Qo ~ OCi)Ci)C/) :t>)>Qo S~~~~-<~s Ci) (X (X (X:X: :t> C) :b :b » ;;:: d c:c:c: ::0 .;;:: .;;:: .;;:: s;; » » » ::0::0::0 ~ ìiiìiiìii ~ ~ ~ ~ p ~ ~ ?! ð ~ ~ ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :: :: :: » <: ~ ~ ::E :: :: :s ~ ~ - - ::0 ~ ~~~~~~~~S;;S;;~P0~~P~ ~~~""~0C).....;;::;;::tnOt::JC)C)0, ~ ~ ~ ñ;.<:.... 0.......00.'" ~ C:»:b"'- ...~~,.... .'-'::O::Eoo;::""'c....J:"',....,....Q.::O .;;:: "'" ."'- rT1 è ::0 <: ¡:::: ¡:;§ ¡:;§ ¡¡: ~ rT1 S S rT1 C) ~ ~ ~ <: ~ 0 ~ ,.... ,.... ,.... :s ,.... » <: <: ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 :x: ~ è ~ ìii ìii ~ ~ Qo Qo Qo <: "''''''' C)5Ci)Qo:X::X:QorT1§::O::O d QoQoQo Qo QoC)QoQo." ,....§5§5 <: ~ ~ ~ ¡¡: Qo (X ,.... (X (X::O tn -< -< Qo ,....,....,.... :sCi)""'»rT1rT1:b ~ (X 000 ::O~~~::I::I<: rT1 rT1 ~~~ -<f!1C)' ..¿..¿~;;:: ~ c... 111 ff¡ ~ ::0 ::0 Ci) ~_ -<:tJ 111 :s .<: ~ ~ ::0 ~ rT1 ~ 0c:(X ~ OS! OS! ¡g S! S! ~ <s o ¡¡: Ci)Oo;;¡::x: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ç ~ ;;:: ~.rT10.Ci)~0.Ci) c: ~ ~~~i;i;~i;i;?!;' S;;~~~~~~~ ~ ;;:: <: ¡¡: Ci) Ci) (X Ci) Ci) ~ Q~~~~~~ fi; ,....,....QoQo...QoQo :s QoC)(')QoC)C) ~ 5~~~~~ 111 ::o~~......~~ -= rT1 S;; S;; , S;; S;; ~ ~ ::0 .~ ~ ~ ~ ..& cø Z o ~ Co) 'V ;III o 'V z m ~ S m 0 :IE z m ;III m z Ô ..... !=> ..... 0 :-" ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... :-" ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... :-" ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... B ;III p 0 0 c C 0 0 c c c c 8 c c c 0 C C C C c 8 c c c c 8 8 c c c 8 8 8 c c C') ~ 0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 c 0 c c 0 c c 0 0 c 0 0 c c c 0 c c 0 v,- 0 "TI ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ ~ C') s.> ~ .w ~ s.> .w .w .w s.> .w w 5-> .w .w .w s.> 5-> .w s.> s.> 5-> s.> s.> .w .w s.> .w s.> C') 8 o c 000 0 0 c 8 c 0 '0 8 8 0 0 c 8 8 8 c 0 '0 8 8 8 0 0 c 8 8 c 0 c :§ 0 ~ ~ . w . w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w !=> 8 !=> 8!=> !=> 0 0 c !=> c 0 0 !=> c 0 0 c !=> !=> 0 0 0 0 !=> !=> 0 0 c c !=> !=> c 0 c CII ~ "" .,., "" "" ~ ~ ~ "" ~ ~ ~ .,., ~ ~ ~ ~ .,., "" ~ ~ ~ ~ "" "" ~ ~ ~ ~ "" "" ~ ~ ~ C; !I: C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 01 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 "TI "TI Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ãi "-. ~ "-. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "-. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m '" ~ ~ '" '" CII 0 00 !=> !'" !=> 00 00 !'" 00 !'" 00 00 !'" !'" !'" 00 00 !'" 00 !'" 00 00 00 00 !'" !'" 00 00 !'" !'" !'" 00 00 00 z èo 0 <0 0 èo èo <0 èo <0 èo èo <0 <0 <0 èo èo <0 èo <0 èo èo èo èo <0 <0 <0 èo èo <0 <0 èo <0 èo èo èo 0 w 0 w 0 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w ~ ~ ;<j~;<j ~ !=> ~ wow 00000 ~ ~ ~ ~ .w .w 5-> .w ~;<j;<j;<j ;<j !=><o<o<o<o OWWWW 000000000 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~s ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j ;<j <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 8 Ô ~ ~ N :§ "TI '¡fl. m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ri ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ òj ~ òj ~ ~ òj òj ~ ~ ~ òj òj ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ òj òj òj ~ ~ ~ ~ òj òj !=> !=> èo 0 <0 0 èo <0 <0 <0 èo èo <0 èo <0 <0 èo èo <0 <0 <0 èo èo <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 èo èo èo <0 <0 <0 <0 èo èo <0 0 <0 0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 CII c: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (,oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ IJ .w w s.> .w .w .w 5-> s.> .w .w s.> .w 5-> .w w w .w s.> ~ 00 00 "co 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 "co 00 00 00 00 00 00 "co 00 00 00 00 00 00 "co "co 00 00 00 00 00 0 òj ~ ~ ~ òj ~ òj òj ~ òj òj òj òj ~ òj òj òj òj òj òj òj òj òj òj ~ òj ~ ~ ~ òj òj òj òj òj òj ~ !=> !=> W 0 w 0 W w W W w W W W W w W W W W W W W W W W w W w w w W W W W W W '" 0 '" 0 '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" 0> '" '" 0> '" '" 0 ~ ¡¡¡ C') ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (,oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :3 C') ~ ... 0 :.e ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ ..... ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ..... ..... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ..... ..... ..... 0 ~ ~ C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 8: C11 ~ C11 C11 ~ C11 C11 c: iJ1 !=> iJ1 !=> iJ1 iJ1 C11 C11 iJ1 C11 iJ1 C11 C11 iJ1 C11 iJ1 iJ1 01 C11 C11 iJ1 C11 iJ1 C11 C11 C11 C11 01 C11 C11 iJ1 C11 z !( ~ 0 c 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ c c ~ ~ ~ c c 0 c ~ ~ ~ c C 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c c c 0 ~ ~ 0 ..... 0 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ~ ~ o c w~w ~ ~ ~ 00000 ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ '0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0'0 ~wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ o 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ~~~~~~~~~~~§ 88888888888 coocccococo wwwwwwwwwww 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .w .w .w .w s.> 0 c 0 0 0 c ~ ~ ~ ~ <0 <0 <0 <0 !=> !=> ..... ..... ..... ..... 0 c c 0 C C C 0 C11 C 01 C C11 C11 C11 C11 ~~~~~{,oo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~§ <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c ceo ceo C C C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 01 C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ {,oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (,oo ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ':ï: .,., "" "" .,., "" .,., "" .,., "" .,., "" "" .,., .,., "" .,., s "" ~ .,., ~ "" "" "" "" "" .,., "" .,., "" "" "" "" "" "" .,., "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" "" .,., .,., "" "" "" .,., !\> !=> !\> !=> !\> !\> !\> !\> !\> !\> '" '" !\> !\> !\> !\> !\> '" '" '" !\> !\> '" !\> !\> !\> !\> '" '" '" '" '" !\> '" '" C11 0 C11 0 C11 C11 C11 C11 ~ ~ ~ 0, C11 C11 C11 C11 C11 0, ~ 0, C11 C11 0, C11 C11 C11 C11 ~ ~ ~ 0, 0, C11 0, 0, ..... 0 ..... 0 ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~{,oo~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~{,oo~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-= ~ !=> ~ !=> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'V ;III CII m m ,... CII i CII !I: Z m ! z ~ ~ 0 CII ¡¡¡ m C') CII 0 CII c: !I: z m ~ z m ~ 0 'V ~ ~ !I: z c: m ~ z ~ 'V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CII ~~~õõõ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~WN~C~~~~~~WN~C~~~~~~WN~C~~~~~_~N~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~88~~888~~~8~~~8888~~ g8888888888~§§ê§êê§§§ ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ? ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 9 ~ 888888888888888888888 ~8~~~~~~~~~88~~~~~~~8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 000 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~28~~~~~~~~~ 666666666666 ~ ccc....................ccccc i:~ 2~~~~~~7i~~&1~.... tD6 888888888888 ~ ~~~8~~~~~~~~ '" '" .to. .to. 00 'f' 'f' èj èj w w 6 6 o 0 o 0 ';oJ 'f' o 0 o 0 ~~ ~ :r: ~ ~ :r:(') :r: :tJ þ ¡::: ........ 0 s¡¡ CiJ f;; ¡jJ ¡jJ ~ ~ !! OO~~:tJ:tJ.~ '~'~r-r-:<PI11 r-~r-r;-~c...D ~ '" ~ ~ :tJ ~ ~ C§~OOr-en::t ~G)¡:D¡:D;¡¡:ñien );:111-;...-;...111110 G)r-;¡¡:;¡¡:I1oš: ~~§;§;~~ ~~ ~ñi D 111 ~ ~ ~ en .j! 111 ~ c... ~ ¡;; );: 1: ~~~~~~~~8~~~m~~mg~~~~ ~ - ~ r- ~ ~ ~ ~ G) ~o ~ ~~ ~ ~ r- f;; ~ :tJ en~ ~ IT! :tJ.eno.I11.. ~~111.,,<: ),;QI11. G):<O""~_ ~~~~(,)~~~0~' r-::¡¡:~~~Q(')~O~ 111:tJ :tJ~'tì·I11·l11hì~~"T10:tJG)¡:::I11~' '~G) :tJ"~r-~~55~DE~~@~~~:tJ~~~ ~ ~ d ~ ~ S S ~ ñi ~ ~ Þ 111 :tJ š: ~);: ~ en en ~""""enen~:tJ""OD:tJ~c... ("):r:~~ ;¡¡: 11oG)G),....,....~ š:~ "'~:tJ 111G).,...G) (') (")~ "".... 11o~ 111.... '<::I1oQó:tJ o ~ '" 110 :tJ :tJ 110 110 '" Þ r-~ enen~ ~O r-š: C)~8(') ~O ~~~ 111~~;¡¡: ðÞ:tJ~ 0~ ~~~ ~:r: o~ ~Qg cñ '" "', :to 0 ~ 111 ¡:: '" ::t ~ -<-< G)C:en >D -<-< :tJ fT1 '" '" ;¡¡: "" š: 5 G) 8 ¡¡¡ ~~~~~~~ Dr-> G5f;;f;; Þ ~¡;j~G)OO~ ~.:tJ¡:::.en.~.~š: . r- en :to :to . ~ri9ñi~~~~ r-:tJ:to(')~~~ !:<~I1o-<OO ~ 111 110 ~ ~ š:~:tJ-<-< . 111 Þ 110 .., ~enen:to11o ~ .., ~ ~ :to D-....G)~ ~~~~G) ~ §; ~ .~ r- :to :; ñi '-'"0 o t . ~ r- ~ cø Z .0 1 w - .... - m z d ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... :-' :-' ... ... ... ... ... ... :-' ... ... :-' ... ... ... ... ..... ... :-' :-' ... ... B ;0 p 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 8 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u.- 0 "1'1 ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ ~ J:3 J:3J:3 J:3J:3 ~~~~~~~ J:3J:3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 s-> s-> .w .w s-> .w s-> .w .w .w s-> .w .w .w s-> .w .w .w .w .w s-> s-> .w .w .w .w .w s-> 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 0 0 0 8 8 8 0 0 0 8 8 8 8 8 0 0 0 0 8 8 8 8 8 0 8 0 0 0 ~ 0 ~ w w w w w w w '" w '" '" '" '" w '" w '" '" CJ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 !:> !:> 0 0 0 0 !:> !:> 0 0 0 0 !:> !:> !:> 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 !:> !:> !:> !:> 0 0 0 0 :c.. :c.. :c.. :c.. :c.. .to. .to. :c.. :c.. :c.. :c.. .to. .to. :c.. :c.. :c.. :c.. .to. .to. .to. :c.. :c.. :c.. :c.. :c.. :c.. :c.. .to. .to. .to. .to. :c.. :c.. :c.. :c.. ¡¡ !I: 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 "1'1 "1'1 Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (,0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ii3 '-J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '-J '-J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "'-. '-J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) CJ 0 ~ ~ ~ Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) Q) Q) ~ ~ ~ Q) Q) Q) ~ ~ Q) ~ ~ ~ ~ Q) Q) Q) Q) ~ ~ Q) ~ ~ ~ Z <C <C <C <0 <C <C <C <C <C <0 <0 <0 <C <C <C <0 <0 <0 <C <C <0 <C to <C <C <0 <0 <0 <0 <C to <0 to to to C '" w '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" w '" '" '" '" '" w '" '" w '" w w '" '" w '" '" w w '" w '" 0 -I ~~~~~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J:3 J:3 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~ J:3J:3J:3J:3 ~~~~~~~ § 0 0 .'" .w s-> .w .w s-> s-> .'" .'" s-> s-> .'" .'" s-> .'" s-> .'" s-> s-> .w .w .'" s-> s-> .'" .'" s-> .'" .w CJ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -I CJ to to to <C ~ ~ ~ to to to <C ~ ~ <C <C to to <C to to to <C ~ to to to to to to <C to to to to to W W W W '" '" w W W W W '" '" w w w w w w w w w '" w w w w w w w w w w w w Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) N :§ "1'1 :.e m 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m M ~ ~ ~ (;i (;i (;i (;i ~ ~ '-J (;i (;i (;i òI ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (;i (;i (;i (;i (;i (;i òI òI (;i ~ (;i òI ~ (;i ~ 91 <C to <C <0 <0 <0 <0 <C <C to <0 <0 <0 <0 to <C to <C <C <C <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 to <0 <0 <C <0 <C <C to to to to to to <C <C <C to to <C <C to <C <C <C <C to to <C to to to to to <C to to to <C <C to to CJ c: ~ t¡ t¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t¡ ~ ~ ~ (,0 ~ ~ ~ ~ t¡ t¡ t¡ t¡ t¡ t¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .w s-> .w s-> s-> .w s-> s-> .'" .'" .'" s-> s-> .'" s-> s->s-> .w.", s-> s-> .w .w s-> .'" s-> -I Q) "ex, "ex, Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) "ex, Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) "ex, "ex, "ex, "ex, "ex, "ex, Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) 0 (;i (;i òI (;i (;i (;i (;i ~ (;i (;i òI (;i (;i òI ~ (;i (;i (;i òI (;i òI (;i (;i (;i (;i ~ ~ ~ (;i òI (;i (;i òI (;i (;i ~ w w w w w w w w W W W W W W '" W W W W W W W W W W w '" '" w w w w w w w 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) C -I ëñ 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (,0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ :3 0 t ,þ. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ?ft ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 01 01 01 01 8: 01 01 ~ 01 01 01 c: 91 01 01 01 01 91 91 91 91 01 01 01 01 CJ1 91 91 91 91 01 91 91 91 91 01 91 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 Z !( ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -I ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccccc- '" w w '" w w w w '" w '" '" '" '" '" w '" '" '" w w '" w w w w w w w '" w w w w w o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 000 0 000 0 0 0 0 000 w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) ~~~~~~~~~~~~(,o(,o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~§ <C to <C to to to to <C <C to <C to to <C to to to to to to to to to to to to to <C <C to to <C to <C <C ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 00000000000000000000000000000000000 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 CJ1 01 01 01 01 01 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (,0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -::;: .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. oS .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. !\> !\> !\> !\> !\> '" '" '" '" '" '" '" !\> !\> !\> !\> !\> !\> '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" !\> !\> !\> '" !\> '" '" '" 01 ~ ~ ~ ~ 0, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 01 CJ1 01 01 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 01 0, ~ ~ 0, 0, ... ... ... ..... ... ... ..... ... ... ... ~~~~~~~~ .'" S'> S'> S'> S'> .0) .'" .'" 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) '" w w '" w w w w w :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::t ::t ~ ~~~~~(,o~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>S'>.... 0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)"'0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0)0) .... w w w '" '" '" w w w w w w w w w w w w w w w '" '" w w w w :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I :"I '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 1ñ "0 ;0 CJ m m r- CJ i! CJ !I: Z m ~ z -I 1ñ c CJ ëñ m 0 CJ 0 CJ c: !I: z m -I z m -I c "0 ?ž ~ !I: z c: m ~ z -I "0 ~ -I !I: 0 91 ~ -I CJ .... """"~""""''''''''''~''''''''' cø ..... ..... ..... ......................................-............................................................... . ......."""".............................................. ..... z ~wwwwwwwwww~~~~~~~~~~..................................................OOOO ø o~~~~~~w~.....o~~~~~~w~.....o~~~~~~w~.....o~~~~ < =y, W" ~ t\) t\) ~ t\) ~ t\) t\) ~ t\) ~ t\) t\) ~ t\) t\) ~ t\) t\) ~ t\) t\) ~ t\) t\) t\) t\) t\) ~ ~ t\) t\) ~ t\) t\) ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c C 01 01 'f' 01 'f' 'f' 01 'f' 01 01 'f' 'f' 01 'f' 01 'f' 'f' 'f' 'f' 'f' 01 'f' 'f' 01 'f' 'f' 'f' 01 'f' 'f' 01 'f' 'f' 'f' 'f' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ 2 ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ 't' w w w w w w 't' w 't' w 't' w 't' w w 't' w 't' 't' w 't' w z 6 c 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 8 6 c 6 6 c 6 6 8 6 6 c 6 c 6 <:) 6 6 c § <:) c 6 6 c 8 c: ~ c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c ~ c ~ ~ <:) ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 c 8 8 i: ~ ~ :ì;! ~ ¡:j 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> ~ 0> ~ 01 01 01 ~ 01 01 ~ ~ ~ w w .... <0 9' ~ 0> 'f' ~ co ~ 'f' 't' t\) C <0 9' ~ <r> 01 w ~ ..... c 'P ~ 01 i' w - IJ 6 c 6 c 6 6 c c 6 c 6 c 6 6 c c 6 c 8 6 6 6 c c c 6 6 c 8 6 c 8 6 c 6 m 6 c c c c c c c c c c c c c <:) c c c c c c c c c c c c c <:) c c c c :III ~ § ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ § ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ § ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0; ..... ..... ..... t... ~ ~ ~ :I: S; OJ OJ OJ OJ () () ~ t... S ¡!! ~ ~ ~ ~ è ::0 :;¡: ffi G'J ~ r- ~ ~ :a ~ š1; ::0 ~ ~ 0 () 0 111 ~ ~ 111 0 0 0 () 0 ¡;; ~ 0 G'J ::0 0 R1 0 :I: ~ - ~ a a 0 0 r- ~ r- Ci) ~ R1 r- 0 111 ~ OJ Ci) ):. ~ :t c: r- ~ Pi ~ )') )') ~ 0 , r- è ~ ~ ,::< ~ ~ ~ ,~ ~ ~ :¡;; GJ hi Ci) Ci) ::0 ~ :¡;; ~ ~ ~ a a ::0 0, ~ ¡!! !ï; !ï; ,~ :¡¡; ~ ,111 ~ Ci) ~ ~ 0 :t ~ Š 0 ,::0 ,::0 ~ 0 ,Ci) :;¡: 0 :< ~ ,~ ::0 ~ :¡¡; ~ ,~ y¡ ~ ~ ;-i ~ ~ y¡ ,~ 111 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ !ï; 0 ~ t... ¡!! ~ () ::0 ,è :< ¡!! -t -t ):. :t ~ ~ ~ ~ !ï; c: ~ t... ~ ~ -< !ï; G'J ~ ~ ~ 0 Ci) ~ 0 š1; ::0 ~ ~ r- r- r- r- ::0 ~ Ci) Ci) § ~ 111 ,111 ::0 ~ Ci) OJ 0 !ï; Ci) ::0 () 111 111 () ~ ~ ~ 111 ::0 r- r- r- r- -< "" ,-< ~ r- ):. ~ ::0 ~ G'J ffi rTi ~ "" -< -< -< -< -< 0 ~ 111 "" "" OJ 111 "" 0 ::0 G'J ~ -< ~ ~ § c: ~ ;¡j 0 ~ rTi s; "" "" "" "" r- ~ ~ ~ 111 "" () ):. ¡!! èi5 Ci) ::0 ::0 ::0 ::0 ::0 r- F2 :n :t o ::0 111 r- 111 ~ ~ -< ;t -< t... ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ "" "" OJ ::0 ~ r?i ::0 111 "" ~ ~ -< Ci) rTi Ci) Ci) Ci) Ci) a1 ~ 111 ~ ~ "" r- "" -< ~ ):. ):. "" ~ ~ ~ ~ ::E ~ -< ~ ~ () ~ 111 ):. ~ "" G'J r- -t r- "" 0 ::0 ¡::: ::0 ~ ~ ~ :t 111 ):. :I: ¡g r- -< Q G'J ~ S .... r- - c: c: c: ~ ~ ~ -< ):. 0 0 Ci) :t> ¡::: 111 ,~ ,~ ,~ Ci) Q ~ ::0 r- 9 ):. ):. ):. ):. 0 :¡;; ,~ ::0 ::0 ::0 ::0 !ï; Çn ):. rTi rTi rTi rTi ~ r- ~ ~ ¡::: Ci) r;:! -< r;:! ~ ~ ~ ;g h\ Ci) :t> ~ Ci) ~ ::0 ¡¡: rTi Ci) 0 m z ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... c ..... !'=' ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... :-' ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... :-' ..... ..... ..... :-' ..... ..... B :III 9 c c 8 6 c 6 6 c c 6 c c 6 6 c 6 6 c 6 6 c 8 c 6 6 6 6 6 c 6 6 6 c c 6 (') c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c c <:) c c c c c ui 0 ." ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~(,o>~(,o>(,o> ~ ~ So> So> ,w So> So> ~ ,w ~ ,w So> ,w ,w So> ,w ,w ,w ,w So> So> So> ,w ,w So> So> ,w ,w So> So> ,w So> ,w So> (') c c c 8 c c c c !'=' 8 c c 8 <:) '0 8 8 c '8 8 8 c c 8 c c 8 8 c <:) 8 8 c c c ~ 0 w w w w w . w w w w w w w w w w W t.> W W W () !'=' c c c c c 8~ 8 ~ c !'=' !'=' <:) c <:) !'=' <:) <:) !'=' !'=' c !'=' !'=' <:) <:) c !'=' !'=' <:) c <:) !'=' !'=' <:) ~ :... :... :... :... :... :... ~ ~ :,., :... :... ~ :... :,., ~ ~ :... ~ ~ :... :... :... ~ ~ :,., :... :,., ~ ~ :... -I 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 () ~ (,0> (,0> ~ ~ ~ (,0> ~ (,0> (,0> (,0> (,0> (,0> (,0> ~ (,0> (,0> (,0> ~ ~ (,0> (,0> (,0> ~ ~ (,0> (,0> ~ (,0> (,0> ~ (,0> ." (,0> ~ m ~ '-J ~ ~ '-J ~ '-J ~ '-J ~ ~ ~ '-J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '-J ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m 0> 0> ~ 0> (,0> 0> 0> 0> () !>:> Q) !>:> !>:> Q) !>:> !'=' Q) !'=' !>:> Q) !>:> !>:> Q) Q) Q) !>:> Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) !>:> Q) !>:> Q) !>:> !>:> Q) Q) !>:> !>:> !>:> Q) co <0 co co <0 <0 <:) <0 c co <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 co <0 <0 <0 co <0 co co <0 w W t.> W W W <:) W C t.> W W W t.> t.> W W W W W W W W W W W W W W t.> W W W W W (') (,0> ~ (,0> ~ ~ ~ (,0> ~ (,0> (,0> ~ (,0> ~ ~ (,0> (,0> (,0> ~ ~ ~ (,0> ~ ~ ~~(,o>(,o>(,o> ~ (,0> ~ ~ ~ § 0 So> So> ,t.> So> So> So> ,w ,w ,w So> So> So> ,w So> So> So> So> So> ,w ,w ,t.> So> ,w ,w ,w So> () ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j <è! <è! ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j <è! ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j <è! ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j ;{:j -I (,0> ~ () ~ ~ co <0 <0 ~ !'=' <0 !'=' <0 co ~ <0 co co co <0 co co <0 co <0 ~ <0 <0 co <0 <0 <0 co ~ <0 co ~ co w w (., (., (., w c (., <:) (., (., w (., (., (., (., (., (., (., (., (., (., w (., (., (., (., (., (., (., w (., (., w (., Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) c Q) <:) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) § ." m ~ ~ (,0> ~ (,0> ~ (,0> (,0> (,0> ~ (,0> (,0> (,0> ~ (,0> (,0> (,0> ~ ~ (,0> (,0> ~ ~ ~ (,0> ~ (,0> (,0> (,0> (,0> (,0> ~ (,0> m '-J ~ ¡:;j ¡:;j ¡:;j ¡:;j (,0> ¡:;j ~ ~ ¡:;j ¡:;j ~ ~ ¡:;j ~ ~ ò ¡:;j ¡:;j ~ ò '-J ¡:;j ò ò ò ò ¡:;j ò ò ò ò ¡:;j ò µ. !'=' !'=' µ. <0 <0 co <0 <0 <0 C <0 <:) <0 <0 co <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 co co <0 <0 <0 co <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 co <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 C <0 <:) <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 co <0 <0 <0 co <0 <0 <0 co co <0 <0 <0 co <0 co <0 <0 <0 co <0 ~(,o>(,o>~ ~ (,0> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (,0> ~ ~ ~ ~ (,0> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~~~~(,o>~ ~ ~ ~ ~ So> ,w ,t.> So> So> w w So> ,w So> ,w ,t.> So> ,w ,w ,w So> So> ,w ,w ,w So> So> ,w So> So> So> ,w Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q, Q) Q, Q) Q) Q) Q) Q, Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) ¡:;j ¡:;j ò ~ ~ ¡:;j (,0> ~ ~ ò ò ¡:;j ò ¡:;j ò ò ò ò ò ò ò ¡:;j ¡:;j ¡:;j ò ò ò ¡:;j ò ò ò ò ¡:;j '-J ò !'=' !'=' µ. w w (., (., (., w <:) (., c (., (., w (., t.> (., (., (., (., (., (., (., w w w (., (., (., w (., (., (., (., w w (., 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> <:) 0> C 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> C -I ¡¡¡ (') ~ ~ (,0> ~ ~ ~ (,0> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (,0> ~ ~ (,0> ~ ~ 3 (') ~ (,0> (,0> ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ ..... ..... ~ ~ ..... ~ ..... ..... ~ ~ ~ ..... ~ ~ ~ ..... ..... ~ ~ ~ ..... ..... ..... ~ ~ ~ ..... ..... ..... ~ ~ 01 01 ~ 01 ~ 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 c: µ. µ. µ. 01 01 µ. !'=' 01 C µ. 01 01 01 µ. µ. 01 01 01 µ. µ. 01 01 µ. µ. µ. 01 01 01 µ. µ. µ. 01 01 µ. µ. z !( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c ~ 6 ~ ~ ~ ~ <:) <:) 6 6 6 <:) c 6 6 c c c 6 6 6 c <:) ~ ~ ~ c <:) -I <:) C ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... lJ; () ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (,0> ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~(,o>~~~~~ m ,~ ,~ ,~ .~ :1>0 ,~ ,~ ,~ ~ .~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ ,~ .~ ,~ .~ § () '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 '0 () c <:) 8 8 c 8 c 8 8 <:) c 8 8 8 c <:) 8 8 8 <:) <:) c <:) 8 i: w W t.> W ~ W ~ W W t.> W W W t.> W W W W W W t.> W t.> !'=' c <:) !'=' c c !'=' c !'=' <:) c c !'=' <:) <:) c !'=' !'=' <:) c <:) <:) !'=' c <:) <:) <:) !'=' !'=' <:) <:) c <:) !'=' !'=' m w (., (., w (., (., <:) (., c (., (., (., w (., (., (., W t.> (., (., (., (., w (., (., (., (., w w (., (., (., (., w w z Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) <:) Q) c Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) -I lJ; C () ¡¡¡ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (,0> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (,0> ~ ~ ~ (,0> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (,0> (,0> ~ ~ ~ (,0> m (') So> So> So> .w .w,w .w So> ,w .w So> ,w ,w w .w So> ,w ,w So> So> So> So> ,w So> So> ,w ,w So> w :§ () 0 <:) c <:) c c <:) c c <:) c ~ <:) <:) c '0 c <:) c c <:) <:) c ~ <:) <:) <:) c <:) ~ <:) c c '0 () c: <0 <0 co <0 <0 <0 ~ ~ ~ <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 co <0 <0 <0 co co <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 co <0 <0 <0 co i: z :-' ..... ..... ..... ..... :-' !'=' !'=' ..... :-' ..... ..... ..... ..... :-' ..... ..... ..... ..... :-' ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... :-' ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... :-' ..... m -I <:) <:) C 6 6 <:) <:) <:) c 6 <:) 6 6 6 6 c 6 6 6 6 c 6 <:) 6 6 6 <:) ~ 6 C 6 6 6 ~ <:) z m 01 01 01 01 01 01 <:) 01 C 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 01 -I C 'V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ~ i: z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ oS m c: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ !\> !\> t\) t\) t\) !\> !'=' t\) !'=' t\) !\> !\> t\) t\) t\) !\> !\> t\) t\) t\) !\> t\) !\> !\> t\) t\) t\) t\) !\> !'> t\) t\) !'> t\) I\) Z 01 01 0, 0, 0, 01 <:) 0, <:) 0, 01 01 0, ~ ~ ~ 01 0, 0, 0, 01 0, 01 01 0, 0, 0, 0, 01 01 0, ~ ~ ~ 0, -I ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... c ..... <:) ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... 'V ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (,0> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (,0> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (,0> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -I .0> .0> 9> ,0> 9> 9> 9> 9> .0> .0> ,0> 9> 9> 9> .0> .0> 9> 9> ,0> 9> 9> ,0> .0> 9> 9> ,0> .0> 9> .0> ,0> 9> ,0> 9> .... i: 0 0> 0> 0> 0> ~ 0> 0> ~ 0> 0> 0> 0> ~ 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> ~ 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> ~ ~ ~ 0> 0> 0> 0> ~ .... m ~ w W t.> W W ~ W ~ W W W W t.> W W t.> W W t.> W W W W W W W W - Z :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J !'=' :'J !'=' :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J :'J ëiI '-J '-J '-J ::::;! '-J '-J C ::::;! C '-J ::::;! ::::;! '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J ::::;! '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J '-J ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... c c ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... .... ~~ cø .... . .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... z 0) 0) 0) 0) ~ 0) 0) 0) 0) 0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 0'1 .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. .to. i OJ 'J 0) 0'1 W "> .... c (0 OJ 'J 0) 0'1 .to. W I\) .... c (0 OJ 'J 0) 0'1 .to. W "> .... Co) '" '" '" ~ '" ~ '" '" '" '" ~ '" '" ~ '" ~ ~ '" '" ~ '" ~ '" '" ~ '" '" ~ .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ~ .... ~ .... 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ CO ~ CO ~ ~ ~ 9' 01 9' 01 01 9' 9' 9' 9' 9' 9' 9' 01 01 9' 01 9' 9' 9' 9' 9' '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ;;:j ~ "..¡ ::t ::t "..¡ ;::¡ ;::¡ ;::¡ ;::¡ ;::¡ ;::¡ à! ~ ~ à! ~ ~ ;::¡ ~ ;::¡ '" '" '" '" '" '" ~ .... .... '" ')-> '" '" ')-> '" '? 0 ~ ~ 9' 9' 9' 9' 01 01 9' 9' 01 ~ .... ~ z 6 0 2 6 0 6 6 0 6 ê 0 0 § 0 0 § 6 § :5 6 § 6 6 § 6 6 2 6 c: ~ 0 0 0 :5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 :5 0 !!: 0 0 ~ 8 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 '" .... .... 0 ~ .... .... .... 0 ~ ... 0> 9' 't' '" '" 'P .... 0 .... .... 't' ')-> .... co 9' 'P 9' 't' .... '? ~ 9' ID is 6 0 6 è 0 6 6 2 6 0 6 6 6 6 0 :5 6 6 0 6 0 :5 0 6 :5 0 0 2 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ;u ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ ~ ~ .... :e ~ DJ s:: s:: :to r- en en (') ~ ~ ~ 2S <: ¡g s:: s:: ~ ~ ~ en :0 en ~ @ @ c... 0 ~ c: :0 rn ö ö ~ ~ C'5 (') (') (') 0 s:: ~ 0 <: DJ s:: ~ en ~ ~ ~ r- 0 ID :t ~ ~ r- ,~ ,~ :0 ,:e ,:e ~ 0 ~ en 0 ~ (') ~ <: ~ :0 ~ $: ,::: ,0 r- r- ~ 0 (') 0 0 en ~ ~ :ï1 ~ .P :0 s:: en (') -I ,~ ,<: 0 0 0 ,~ ,~ ~ r- §:; ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 ,:0 r- ,1ñ ~ ~ ,en :e ~ ,<: Ci) :2 ~ :0 0 ,en 0 0 0 ~ r- r- :0 hi ~ ~ <: 0 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ ~ en ID r- r- Ci) 111 ,Ci) :::0 0 en :0 ~ §:; ñi 0 ñi ñi 0 r- ::! ::! ~ ~ ::! :0 r- r- ~ ~ -< en :::0 :::0 111 en en en ~ 0 en en <: 111 ~ 0 0 r- r- :to 111 111 111 en ~ ~ $: $: "" Ci) ::! ::! 0 r- ~ en :e ~ :e :e Ci) 111 0 (') (') -I -I <: 0 s:: s:: );! r- "" "" "" 0 ~ en en 0 "" "" !T1 111 :2 r- :to -< -< ~ ¡g c: );! ~ ~ :0 0 :0 Ci) c... c... ~ -< "" 111 (') ë;j (') (') ¡g ~ ~ (') "" ~ ¡:: -< :to "" ~ :ï1 :ï1 :ï1 0 0 0 :to "" r- en :2 :::0 :::0 ~ ~ <: !! ~ ::! r- "" ~ 111 C'5 ~ :2 1:1 1:1 ~ DJ (') :2 ~ -I r- 7i ~ ~ $: <: *- *- :t ~ :0 $: $: ... ~ :to s:: s:: en 0 ~ :0 -< c: ~ ~ c: :<:: 0 r- ID en r- :2 ,111 r- r- Ci) c... ~ ~ § :2 ~ 111 0 c: c: en en :ï1 :ï1 ñi ñi 0 0 :2 :2 ,.... ,.... I '" m z "..¡ .... !'> ~ w ¡.> .... N .... .... :-' .... .... ¡.> .... .... !'> .... '" '" !'> .... '" .... .... .... '" !=> .... B ;u 9 .... <::, 01 0> 0, 0 <0 ~ <::, <::, 0 <::, <::, 0 0 <::, 0 :5 <::, <::, 0 <::, <::, <::, 8 <::, <::, 0 <::, (') 0, 0 0> .... '" co '" 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 u.- 0 0 .., OJ t¡ f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 t¡ f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 ~ f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 t¡ f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 (') I\) ,"..¡ .... ,õ $> $J1 :-I ,w ,w ,w s.> ,<0 ,w s.> ?> ,0> ,0> 0> s.> ,0> s.> ,w ,0> ,w (') ~~ 0 ,"..¡ 0 0 C f>4 ;r:; I\) òj 0 0> W co '" 8 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 0 8 0 8 8 0 !=> 8 :§ 0 ~ " ~ w w ~ ë;j w w W <0 W 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> W 0> 0 :-01 <0 0> ¡.> !=> 0 0 !=> 0 .... 0 0 !=> 0 !=> !=> 0 !=> !=> 0 0 0 0 :5 !=> !II ~ men ~ ~ <0 :-' :-01 "..¡ ~ <::, .... ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ co ~ co co 00 .... co ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ !!: 01 .... ~ .... "..¡ 0> "..¡ 01 01 01 01 01 .... 01 01 <0 01 <0 <0 <0 01 <0 c.n 01 01 <0 01 !II !::rc (0 "..¡ 0'1 3C{'z 60 z<~~ '" .., ):It' . 0 ~ ~ ~ f>4 f>4 ~ f>4 f>4 ~ f>4 f>4 ~ f>4 .., Z ;:Q'Z ,co f>4 1'> .... f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 1'> f>4 f>4 ,.... f>4 .... .... f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 .... f>4 ììi <0 W -.... f>4 0. b b 0. b ~ m õ! õ! ;::¡ w co õ! õ! õ! "..¡ õ! w õ! õ! ~ õ! õ! õ! õ! õ! õ! m ~4;q 0> w 0> õ! .... 0> 0 W W f>4 !II 0 ~...t1. -!>- co co ?> ?> ?> 01 ?> ?> co ?> ?> ?> co ?> :-01 ?> :-01 :-01 :-01 co :-01 co co co :-01 !=> co Z fLS/ 0> <0 ~ "..¡ 0> W W ~ <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 ~ <0 <0 co <0 co co co <0 co <0 <0 <0 co 0 <0 c u)~):It.,... ...<.. <0 W 0> "..¡ .... .... 01 W W W W W W W W 0> W 0> 0> 0> W 0> W W W 0> 0 W m (1)'0.".;" >< m~~;·~" :r:: ~ æ 0 f>4 f>4 f>4 ~ (') :::¡ ,~ f>4 f>4 '" ,w .... f>4 f>4 ~ f>4 ~ ~ f>4 60 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 ~ f>4 ~ f>4 ~ f>4 ~ § 0 ,w 50 .... .... ,"..¡ .<0 ,w s.> .... .w s.> ,"..¡ s.> ."..¡ :"I ,"..¡ ,"..¡ ,w s.> :"I !II 01 ~ ;;:j -.... w ;::¡ '" .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ w ~ ~ 01 ~ 01 01 c.n ~ 01 ~ ~ ~ c.n ~ ~ w '" ë;j <0 ~ <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 f>4 !II DI !=> <0 0> co !'> -!>- <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 ?> <0 ~ ?> <0 ?> ?> ?> <0 ?> <0 <0 <0 ?> !=> <0 0> W ~ ~ 00 0 co 0, W W W W W W w w òj W òj òj òj w òj w w w òj 0 w .... co 0 co 0 co 0 0 co co co co co co co co co co co co 0 co f>4 '" § .., .0 ~ ~ f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 60 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 m 0> f>4 '" '" .... ~ f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 '" f>4 f>4 ~ f>4 ~ ~ ~ f>4 ~ f>4 f>4 f>4 ~ f>4 m w òj <0 '" 0> W .... òj iJi òj iJi iJi '" òj iJi òj òj iJi iJi òj f>4 iJi !=> .... ?> :-01 -!>- ~ '" :-01 .... .... !=> ~ <0 ~ 01 .... ~ <0 W <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 0 <0 <0 "..¡ co 0 "..¡ <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 0> <0 <0 co <0 co co co <0 co <0 <0 <0 co 0 <0 f>4 .... 0 f>4 f>4 ~ ~ 01 f>4 f>4 '" .... ~ f>4 ~ f>4 ~ ~ f>4 f>4 60 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 ~ f>4 f>4 ~ f>4 .'" s.> 50 .... .w .... :"I <0 ,w s.> .... w ,w ,"..¡ s.> ."..¡ ,"..¡ ,"..¡ s.> ,"..¡ s.> s.> ."..¡ ,w § co <0 co ~ <0 .... W co co co co co 0> Ò:> co òj Cb òj òj òj Cb òj co co co òj co òj '" 01 W .... 0 òj òj òj òj òj '" òj òj òj òj iJi iJi òj f>4 òj !=> :-01 .... ?> !=> !=> ?> !=> !=> !=> !=> !=> !=> !=> Ï\.> W <0 0 Ï\.> Ñ ;::¡ co W W W W W 0 W W ë;j W ë;j ë;j ë;j w ë;j w w W ë;j 0 W 01 0> W 01 co "..¡ 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> <0 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> 0 0> C ~ ~ Cii (') 1'> f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 t¡ f>4 ~ f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 60 t¡ t¡ f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 t¡ f>4 3 (') m 0 ~ w co 01 .... '" ~ .... ~ ~ .... .... ~ w ~ w ~ w .... ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ Cb <0 ~ .... "..¡ <0 ;;:j 01 01 0> 01 ¡:) .... õ õ ¡:) c.n .... f>4 c: 0> 01 0> ~ :-01 :-01 01 ~ ~ 01 01 ~ 01 01 ~ 0 01 ~ 01 0 !=> ~ z !( ~ ~ 00 '" 0> .... 0> <::, <::, ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ <::, <::, 8 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ <::, 0 0 ~ 01 .... co 01 .... W W .... W W W .... W 0 .... ~ ~ !II 0 60 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 m <0 ~ .... '" .... .Ñ f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 ~ ~ ~ ,Ñ ~ ~ f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 ~ ~ f>4 f>4 ~ :§ !II .... s:> ,'" .~ ,"..¡ ,<0 .... ,.... sn ,.... sn ,co ,co ,.... sn ,.... ,co ;.., 0 0 "8 0 0 0 0 0 "8 !II W ë;j ~ ~ ë;j 0> 0 0 0 0 8 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 !!: .... w .... ~ ¡:j w w w W <0 W W 0> 0> 0> 0> 0> W W 0> f>4 :-01 0 :-01 .... ?> co 0 0 !=> 0 0 :-' !=> 0 !=> 0 !=> !=> !=> 0 !=> 0 0 0 !=> !=> 0 m ;::¡ W "..¡ W <0 01 W <0 W W w W W W w w õ! w õ! õ! õ! w õ! w w w õ! 0 w z co "..¡ w w "..¡ w .... co co co co co co co co Cb co co Cb 0 co ~ ~ C 60 Cii ~ ~ f>4 !II (') ~ f>4 ~ f>4 f>4 ~ f>4 f>4 f>4 ~ ~ f>4 t¡ t¡ 60 f>4 f>4 f>4 60 f>4 f>4 ~ ~ f>4 f>4 t¡ m <0 ,"..¡ ,"..¡ ,<0 $J1 ,"..¡ ,w s.> W <0 ?> s.> ?> ,0> ?> s.> ?> s.> .0> :§ !II 0 ;.., 0 ~ .... co 01 <0 .... 0 § 0 0 0 ;.., 0 0 .... § ~ ~ .... 0 ~ 0 0 § ~ C !II c: ~ ~ w co '" ~ .... <0 ~ ~ ~ ¡:;! <0 ~ co co <0 <0 <0 f>4 <0 !!: z ¡.> ¡.> !=> !=> ?> .... .... !'> !'> !'> !'> .... !'> .... .... !'> !=> :-' m ~ Ï\.> <::, .... 01 ~ .... 00 01 <::, <::, ~ 0 <::, ~ <::, 0 .... <::, .... .... .... <::, .... <::, ~ <::, .... 0 ~ z m "..¡ 01 0 01 01 '" W 01 01 01 c.n 01 01 .... 01 .... .... .... 01 .... 01 01 .... 0 ~ c ~ ." ~ '" ~ f>4 f>4 ~ ~ f>4 ':i: ~ s:> ~ ,'" .... f>4 ~ ~ ~ f>4 ~ .... ~ f>4 f>4 ~ f>4 t¡ f>4 ~ f>4 ~ f>4 ~ f>4 ~ !!: z .... .... .... 0. w co 0 .... w .... co co co co .... co oS m c: .... ~ W <0 01 0> .... 0> .... .... .... .... .... '" .... .... Cb ~ co co Cb ~ co .... .... .... co f>4 .... Z ~ '" '" '" ~ :-01 !'> <0 !'> '" !'> '" '" '" :-01 !'> !'> ~ '" ~ ~ ~ '" 01 !'> '" '" 01 !=> '" 0, 0, ~ ;xl 0> <0 ~ 8 ~ ~ 0, 0, ~ ~ 01 01 8 ~ 0 8 8 0, <::, 01 0, ~ <::, 0 0, ~ '" .... 01 .... .... .... .... .... w .... w .... .... w 0 .... ~ ." co f>4 f>4 f>4 ~ ~ f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 ~ f>4 f>4 ~ d 0 f>4 ~ W '" .... f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 f>4 .cô f>4 f>4 .... f>4 ,w ~ f>4 .... f>4 f>4 f>4 .... f>4 1'> ,0> :"I ,w ,0 .'" $J1 ?> ?> ?> .0> ?> .0> ?> s.> ,0> W .0> s.> 9> .0> ?> s.> 9> ... !!: ~ .... 0> <0 .... W .... ~ <0 0> 0> ~ 0> 0) <0 ~ ~ '" 0> '" '" ;.., 0> '" 0> ~ ~ '" ~ ... m w w <0 W ~ .... w w w w w ~ iJi w òj òj òj w òj w iJi f>4 Z :-01 :-01 !'> 0> -!>- .... 0 :-01 :-01 :-01 :-01 :-01 :-01 :-01 :-01 :-01 :-01 :-01 :-01 !=> :-01 ~ ~ ~ 01 0, ë;j .... ~ 0, ~ ~ "..¡ "..¡ ~ Ñ ~ "..¡ .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "..¡ .... :5 ~ !II W "..¡ .... 0 0 .... .... .... '" '" '" '" '" .... '" '-' ..., EXHIBIT "C" MAP OF MSBU -6- 'Sunland ~rdens EXHIBIT "C" Scale: 1 """" 400' N MSBU (PHASE 1 ) .>~~ .L.._~ ,i.....,.i'~ :t- GIS. .,~':--- revised November 19, 2003 Map ¡ c=¡ - ..' - .. . ~"I :: j.: .t " . . ~ _ .. .-i! .'.... \ \. J t . . .t .~1·"- oM ¡.. I ð ~~@ .... . At: I .... / /41/«X1T «}()()/ .J 2.113 At: . i r .,. 7 i ¡.... ~; /<HI-coœ-«XJ/9 '. -:.., ..18 At: .. I ., ¡ ." "" ...., dr44l-cotiB<JOti/j 1..2 At: '..' . /+H{JDOHXJOI JJ' :0.12 At: . I ."'.1 /+H{X)J5- OOOlor - , IAq . _.~Jf'''. .'"" .... AVE"-Æ: . ..-' '--I . ~. ..,. J!.r~ . I I.ft_; l- "'....._~.k..: ; /~{)o<IlI. ,_ !" 2.iT At: ! _ J L n, I I _ I~ 01 I_J li-QœO»f9J1 ; 1.~IIIAt: 1 "~:....-:.~.- 1_ .J-'" . ,,~.u, - ~ ¡~II' ;/~«W;II flH1OO2-oaYI0J ¡ 1 i.ñ At: 1 i 2.12 At: ; 1 1 i .... I _ .J ...: .. .a::[" '. ...... ..AR_ CIRCLE ..... · . . · . . · . : l22.io(){)()l~"~ i 1.117 At: '-:..! CIRCLE h~7~1f.i].., I~ I,t..:' ,_1.1 . :. I I' ". '\,.. ............ AVE"-Æ: ~ ..... " \~ - 'f) - ~ " .,.. '-" ..I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. ~ DATE: January 6,2004 REGULAR [ PUBLIC HEARING ~ CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Herman's Bay Beach Access - Exchange for Alternate Beach Access Property BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS A V AILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDA TION: Staff recommends that the Board determine if it wishes to exchange the proposed property and, if the Board authorizes the exchange of the proposed property, approve Resolution No. 04- 26 as drafted and authorize the Chairman to sign the Resolution. County Attorney: J¿r uglas Anderson County Administrator Review and Approvals COMMISSION ACTION: NCE: [~APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 Management & Budget Prop. Acq. Mgr: Originating Dept. Com. Dev. Dir: Parks & Rec Dir: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff.5/96 '-"' ....,¡ INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY I FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO.: 03-1883 DATE: December 22, 2003 SUBJECT: Herman's Bay Beach Access - Exchange for Alternate Beach Access Property ************************************************************************** BACKGROUND: The County owns property where the Herman's Bay beach access is located. The beach access is approximately one hundred feet (100') wide. Herman's Bay beach access is shown on the attached map in green. The County obtained the property by Warranty Deed dated September 24, 1962. A copy of this deed is also attached. The developer of Diamond Sands has proposed to convey property to the County that is approximately one hundred fifty feet (150') wide in exchange for the County's conveyance of the Herman's Bay beach access property to the developer. The developer has proposed to construct parking and lighting improvements on the property proposed to be conveyed to the County. The property the developer proposes to convey to the County is shown on the attached map in pink. As a result of comments raised by citizens at the October 28, 2003 Board meeting regarding the ocean bottom of the Diamond Sands' parcel, Central Services Project Manager Don McLam swan and surveyed the bottom. A copy of Mr. McLam's November 17, 2003 e-mail outlining the results of his survey is attached. As indicated in the e-mail, Mr. McLam found hard bottom in the entire area of the ocean bottom of the donted parcel from about one foot to six feet of water. The ocean bottom at Herman's Bay was sand except in two small places in about four feet of water. The Diamond Sands developers are aware of Mr. McLam's findings and have requested that the board advertise the public hearing to give the developers an opportunity to address issues and concerns that the Board and the public may have. "-' ...,.¡ Under Florida law (Section 125.37, Florida Statutes), the County must hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution before exchanging County property. The Board granted permission to advertise a public hearing on December 16, 2003 and notice was published in the Tribune on December 21 and December 24, 2003. RECOMMENDA TION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board determine if it wishes to exchange the proposed property and, if the Board authorizes the exchange of the proposed property, approve Resolution No. 04-26 as drafted and authorize the Chairman to sign the Resolution. Respectfully submitted, DSM/ caf Attachment \...- cn 0) æŒ ü C ü co <x:{5 >< ..cW ü CO~ O)t aJO) 0.. ~e coo... cn"D - 0) C cn co 0 Eo.. ~ 0 0) ~ Io... a lJJ C!) 2 ~ o G5 lJJ C!) 2 [jj o Q: ~ c co Q) ü o ü :¡::; c co 4: u <: I") N I") li)~ 8~/~ ..... ef'....... I'<') ...... ~6~1+I d u ~ __, 10 a <:.......... '+1 8 ~ ~ alO 0 ~ I rr) 8~ c\¡ Z / (\N ,(\<: §r-i 8~..j , a CO'L YL 'It , ~ ~I '- I'<') u '- oc( -.-" ---- ~/ ./- / /~ /~ ..... .-/- (\ /~ " /1 /B ~ , -- 8 I (\ ~ '- 10 ;/ N ..... (\ " au 8<: ...!...I") 8~ a , ~ c '- 0 0 0) co -1 "- Q) > ä: c .~ "'0 C .-/ I If) N If) (f)tJ + æ Z 0 0 <::( :r: C"') 0 0 0 LE C\I ,j C"') C!) C\I "- i.o Q) C\I >- .0 C\I 0 ~ ...... I~ ü II 0 "'0 ..- y:> Q) "- Q) 2 co co 'Ii{ Q. Q) Ü ~ ~ "- CJ) Q. Q. ffi co ~ :r: I I ~I 111 ~I ~1 ~I ~I 61 ,.... :1 1111 u.. °1 w ~I zl " , ~9':>"!.. ~/ /'" /. /...... u / ())<: / --- " .,/ /§~ /' ,rr) . (\ 8' aD ~~ ~..j '- \ \ \ \ \ \"" ~ \ \ \ / \// u <: \ \ \ \ ,,~ o ~\ .....v ~t!) " . at!) g, §~ a<: ,..j I'<')m ~:::> '-(/) / :19"/ ,,9;/' / / '-' "LAIM DEED 0: R.1 BnD~ :/,4' r'm501 DREW'S fOh, Mon-""",JJId IInd 'or ull. by Th. H. &. W. .. Dr.w C.,"pony ~ Jocluonvj., Florida ~~~·'-120413 . FA-I-A ~~. Jhis ßuit-!laim j)eed, Executed this vlt- day of September, A. D. 19 62 ,by w. C. SCHMIDT, Also known as WILLIAM C. SCHM+~T joined by his wife, . CECELIA G. SCHMIDT ST. LUCIE COUNTY firs I party, to whose postoffice address is Drawer 11;1., Fort Pierce, Florida ~ s:cond p~:ty: (Wherever used herein che tcrnu "lirat party" and "HeaRd patty" shaU include ¡insular and plural, hein legaJ rcprescntativtJ, and auigns o( individuala, and the ,ucCUIOrs and .wgn, of corporations, whcre.nr the c~nlcxt 10 admib Dr rcquim.) 1I1¡itnessdh, That the said firs{ party, for and in consideration of the sum of $ 10.00 in hand paid by the said second party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise. re- lease and quit-claim unto the said second party foreller. all the right, title, interesl.. claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the following describecL lot. piece or.parcel".of..land, situate. lying and being in the County of St. Lucie State of Florida , to-wit: All that part of the North 100 feet, including riparian and littoral rights appurtenant thereto, of the following described lands in St. Lucie County, Florida, to-wit: The South 3705.83 feet of the following described property, situ- ate, lying and being in St. Lucie County, Florida, to-wit: A tract of land in Section 22 and 27, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, bounded on the South by a line parallel to and 765 feet northerly (measured at right angles) from the South line of said Section 27; on the North by a line parallel ,to and 6323.74 feet northerly (measured at right angles) from the ~~south line of said Section 27; on the West by the waters of the ~! [ndian River; and on the East by the waters of the Atlantic Ocean; ~ \~he above description describing the South 4000 ocean front feet r¡.fof said property in accordance with the "Base line" as shown on the George S. Brockway survey under f11'e No. TMA-ll09. Together with the riparian and, littoral rights appurtenant thereto or in anywise belonging. Subject to all existing rights-of-way for public roads and the Intra-Coastal waterway, if any, which lies East of the East right-of-way line of State Road A-l-A, Section 94050-2107, according to. the right-of-way map of said road recorded in Map Book 1, pages 27~ 127 and 29 in the office of the Clerk of Circuit Court, St. Lucie County, Florida. The above desc~ibed lands are deeded purs~ant to the Resolution adopt ed by the Board ot County Commissione~s o~ St. Lucie County on August 8, 1962 abandonin1ithe O¡d A-l-A, or be~ch road, rightb-of-wavL and J ~ d t ld sa¡.d lands are to be used for pu lic pQrposes I) 1I1aue an I) 0 thB same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right. IiIle, interest, lien, equity and claim what- soever of the said first party. either in law or equity. to the only proper use. benefit and behoof of the said second party foreller. nly )n 1I1¡itness 1ifherel)f~ The said first party has signed first abolle written. Signed, sealed and delillered in presence of: and sealed these presents the day and year <...~....... ............p.~.~.......................... .~ '-:l--~·- ::;:d.lë,·...~L¿~l-... ....,.;·dl?...........œ Y1. . ~cumJ.ut, a so Known as };¿~:~.~~~C~~ß~,~..ŒJ if ~~ (L. SchmJ.dt . ) ~e~ STATE OF ~ New York COUNTY OF ç.'l. I 6 } I HEREBY CERTIFY Ihat on Ihi. day, before me, an officer duly authorized in the: State aforesaid and in the County aforesaid to take acknowledgments, personally appeared W.. C. S£HMIDT aho kno>YnS hal3 William C. Schmidt joined by hJ.swJ.te,CeceIJ.a G. c mJ.dt, to me known 10 be the pe"on Sdescrlbed in and who executed Ihe foregoing instrument and they acknowledged they . ..: before me Ihat .;.., .~~~<;,~}"¢: ,.Ihe .ame. 'i ~ WITNESS mr",~~.q~.; ,~~d:· ··~fficial seal in the Counly and Slale lasl aforesaid this jÌ/ day of SePtemb~?'~'~i: ....'A:Ii::: is. 62. / .......................~'-!/.:,.~:...:..:t:.:!..~............................~ ,'j~25.~;~.·:.~'-;,"'_. Notary Public ..: -' '.. !':i:l:QommissionExpires://f6-r /(~.QJâi;¥,.)'S;a.L).':: }\,-i. DAVID A,. BIRKBY - Rog. No: 959 / . .' ':. '.' l'Iohry Public ,n the St.te 01 New Yor2 \. . . Residing in Erie Co. /:It time of- ^pþointm~nJ L......4 ~ I ,.- A \ ;./ / · Page 1 of 1 '-" ..." Daniel McIntyre - Herman's Bay - Land Swap From: To: Date: Subject: CC: Don McLam Daniel McIntyre 11/17/200311:22 AM Hennan's Bay - Land Swap Douglas Anderson; RAYMOND WAZNY; Roger A Shinn On November 3, 2003 staffwith owner's rep. present swam the ocean bottom. We found hard bottom in the entire area of the swap from about I' to about 6' of depth. In front of Hennan's Bay we found sand except in two small places were a hard bottom existed in about 4' of water. Since our visit, the lifeguard staff has been monitoring the area for use, at this time of the year the majority of the people are walking, sunbathing, fishing or just stopping for a break. DON YJ J \,í\t?), ?\\~ . 0..CP .. n, \.J DO <\¡( (~ c/ ,\( ~ \J ??~ Q$/ file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\Administrator\Local%20Settings\ Temp\GW} 00... 11/17/2003 ~ ....J RESOLUTION NO. 04- 26 A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING AN EXCHANGE OF LAND BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND TREASURE CAY, LLC (A PRIVATE DEVELOPER) OF PROPERTY LOCATED IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA; AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN OF THE COUNTY COMMISSION TO EXECUTE DEEDS AND OTHER INSTRUMENTS TO EFFECTUATE SAID EXCHANGE; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; AND PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, Treasure Cay, LLC, is the owner of property located on the east side of State Road A-1-A, approximately 4 miles north of the Jensen Beach Causeway, in the HIRD (Hutchinson Island Residential District) Zoning District, more particularly described in PART A below; and, WHEREAS, the property described in PART A below includes one hundred fifty (150) linear feet of accessible oceanfront property; and, WHEREAS, St. Lucie County is the owner of property, more particularly described in PART B below, and more commonly referred to as the "Herman's Bay" beach access which consists of approximately a 100-foot wide public beach access which was dedicated to St. Lucie County by quit claim deed on September 24,1962 and specifically set forth by said deed for "public purposes only"; and, WHEREAS, the Treasure Cay, LLC has clear title to the property described below in PART A and has agreed to convey said property by warranty deed, free and clear of all encumbrances, to St. Lucie County; and, WHEREAS, the property described in PART A below is valued at $2,500,000.00; and, WHEREAS, Treasure Cay, LLC wishes to exchange the 150 linear feet of oceanfront property located at the north end of their property, as described in PART A below, for 100 linear feet of oceanfront property owned by St. Lucie County, as described in PART B below; and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County Commissiol'l has determined that an exchange of the 100 linear feet of public beach accessible oceanfront property described below in PART B with the linear feet of accessible oceanfront property described below in PART A serves a valid public purpose by providing for a larger beach access for the citizens of St. Lucie County; and, ~ ~ WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 125.37, Florida Statutes, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County is authorized and empowered to exchange property described below in PART B for the property described below in PART A; and, WHEREAS, St. Lucie County has agreed to abandon the 100 linear feet of public beach accessible oceanfront property described below in PART B so that the property owned by Treasure Cay, LLC is contiguous; and, WHEREAS, Treasure Cay, LLC has agreed to improve the 150 linear feet of public beach accessible oceanfront property described below in PART A by providing public parking and a public dune crossover in accordance with the plans attached as Exhibit "A"; and, WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County deems the above- described exchange of property to be for public purpose and in the best interest of the citizens of St. Lucie County; and, WHEREAS, the Board caused the above described exchange of property to be advertised for public hearing and said public hearing was held on January 6, 2004 pursuant to Section 125.37, Florida Statutes. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida; Section 1: Exchange Authorized The 150 linear feet of public beach accessible oceanfront property described below in PART A shall be exchanged for the 100 linear feet of public beach accessible oceanfront property described below in PART B. PART A LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR TREASURE CAY, LLC PROPERTY TO BE EXCHANGED FOR COUNTY PROPERTY: The North 150.00 feet of the South 5057.83 feet of Section 27, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. Lying easterly of the right-of-way for St. Road A-1-A, and lying westerly of the mean high water line of the Atlantic Ocean. '-' "'" PART B LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR COUNTY PROPERTY TO BE EXCHANGED FOR TREASURE CAY, LLC PROPERTY: All that part of the North 100 feet, including riparian and littoral rights appurtenant thereto, of the following described lands in St. Lucie County, Florida, to-wit: The South 3705.83 feet of the following described property, situate, lying and being in St. Lucie County, Florida, to wit: A tract of land in Sections 22 and 27, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, bounded on the South by a line parallel to and 765 feet northerly (measured at right angles) from the South line of said Section 27; on the North by a line parallel to and 6323.74 feet northerly (measured at right angles) from the South line of said Section 27; on the West by the waters of the Indian River; and on the East by the waters of the Atlantic Ocean; the above description describing the South 4000 ocean front feet of said property in accordance with the "Base line" as shown on the George S. Brockway survey under file No. TMA-ll09. Together with the riparian and littoral rights appurtenant thereto or in anywise belonging. Subject to all existing rights-of-way for public roads and the Intra-Coastal Waterway, if any, which lies East of the East right-of-way line of State Road A-1-A, Section 94050-2107, according to the right-of-way map of said road recorded in Map Book 1, pages 27, 127 and 29 in the Office of the Clerk of Circuit Court, St. Lucie County, Florida. The exchange is subject to: 1. Treasure Cay, LLC providing the County, prior to the exchange, with: a. A title insurance commitment and policy that issues title in PART A to the County free and clear of all liens and encumbrances. b. An upland boundary survey of PART A certified to the County and the title insurer issuing the commitment and policy referenced in Paragraph 1a which survey reflects no easements or encroachments. \w1 ...., c. A Phase 1 Environmental Audit of PART A certified to the County which Audit reflects no evidence of hazardous waste contamination on PART A. 2. Treasure Cay, LLC obtaining all required permits and constructing and completing the improvements identified in Exhibit "A" to the County's satisfaction. 3. The County conveying PART B to Treasure Cay, LLC by County Deed in recordable form. Section 2: Authority of Chairman of Board of County Commissioners The Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners for St. Lucie County is hereby authorized to execute any and all deeds or other instruments necessary to effectuate the exchange authorized by this Resolution. Section 3: Severability In the event a court of competent jurisdiction shall hold or determine that any part of this resolution is invalid or unconstitutional, the remainder of the resolution shall not be affected and it shall be presumed that the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners did not intent to enact such invalid or unconstitutional provision. It shall further be assumed that the Board of County Commissioners would have enacted the remainder of this resolution without said invalid or unconstitutional provision, thereby causing said remainder to remain in full force and effect. Section 4: Effective Date This Resolution shall be effective upon adoption by the Board of County Commissioners for St. Lucie County. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis XXX Vice Chairman John D. Bruhn XXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner Cliff Barnes XXX \.- ...,,¡ PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this day of January, 2004. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY I FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY L ~ ....,. AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. 5C DATE: January 6,2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [x] Leg. [] Quasi-JD [x] CONSENT [ ] PRESENTED BY: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): County Attorney Daniel Mcintyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Petition for Abandonment Abandon a 30 f1. Platted Easement through the Northwest 1/4 of Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 39 East according to Plat Book 3, Page 30. Resolution No.04-28 BACKGROUND: Please see attached Memorandum. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: December 9,2003 - Request for Permission to Advertise Notice of Public Hearing RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Resolution No. 04-28, instruct staff to publish the final Notice of Abandonment, record Resolution No. 04-28, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Public Hearing, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Abandonment and the quit-claim deeds releasing rights to platted right-of-way in the Public Records of S1. Lucie County, Florida. lX APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER Approved 5-0 Dou a Anderson County Administrator COMMISSION ACTION: 1""1 c,"oty Altom'" Y (xx) Originating Dept.: iN-a.. Review and Approvals (xx) Public WOrks:~ (:, ) Purchasing: (xx) County Engineer: (xx) Road & Bridge ... ...",¡ PROPERTY ACQUISITION DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners fROM: Daniel McIntyre, County Attorney DATE: January 6, 2004 SUBJECT: Public Hearing Abandonment of an unopened 30 ft. Platted Easement in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 39 East according to Plat Book 3, Page 30. BACKGROUND: The Property Acquisition Division received a request from Philip and Troy Drawdy to abandon a 30 foot platted easement in the Northwest 1/4 of Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 39 East according to Plat Book 3, Page 30. Ru-mar, Inc. also owns property on either side of the referenced 30 foot easement and has consented to abandonment of the platted easement. Ru-mar, Inc. can access their property through other right-of-ways as shown on the attached map. The Petitioners' reason for the abandonment is as follows: To extinguish a "paper" easement that arises only because it is depicted graphically on the original 1914 plat of this property and although no express dedication exists these old plats have been constructed to create easements for ingress and egress or rights of way based on the graphics. No road improvements, drainage or any other structural improvements have been built or are contemplated to be built in this location at this time. The Petitioners' have previously donated 15feet of road-right-of-way along Midway Road for future widening totaling .34 acres. Upon the approval of this abandonment the petitioner will submit their site plans for the subject property. At that time they will be asked to dedicate 15feet of road frontage, totaling .46 acres for a total of .80acres. The petitioners will then have donated approximately the same acreage as being abandoned. The affected property owners have provided executed, unrecorded quit claim deeds releasing rights to the platted right of way. These quit claim deeds are attached and will be recorded in the public records of St. Lucie County by the property owners. A Notice of Intent to Abandon was advertised on August 12 and August 19, 2003. No objections were filed. t ....., PROPERTY ACQUISITION DIVISION MEMORANDUM On December 9, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners approved Permission to Advertise for a Public Hearing on January 6, 2004. On December 19, 2003, letters weremailedtoallpropertyowners.lying within 300 feet of the proposed abandonment area and no objections were filed. On December 19, 2003, a Notice of Public Hearing was advertised in the Tribune. All relevant public utilities have been notified and no objections have been filed. Public Works, County Surveyor, Road & Bridge, Community Development and Utilities had no objection. The County Engineer has objected the abandonment. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Resolution No. 04-28 instruct staff to publish the final Notice of Abandonment, record Resolution No. 04-28, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Public Hearing, Proof of Publication of the Notice of Abandonment and the quit-claim deeds releasing rights to platted right-of-way in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. Respectfully submitted, Daniel McIntyre County Attorney '-' .....I -. 10".21 oJ7.37 l7a.J7 14~7 .... 1 I I I 1 I I I I I I 1 I I ~ J ~ 2 ~ -I 110.22 Ac) -, (10.23 Ac:) I I I I I I I I 1 I I 1 \ _____~L____~------~~------~------~~------~------~~-----~ I I I t:! 1 I I I I \ I \ I I I I I I 1 ~ ~ ~ =1 :1 =1 I (10.23 Ac) I (10.2~ Ad I I : (SOHXJ2O-<XX)/5J : : I TL 116.86 Ac 1 I I I I 1 I -----~~------r------~~------+------£~------~-----~~:~---- ~ I I I I 1 1 I 1 1 I I I I I 1 1 I 1 ~ ~ ~ ;1 ;' 111 :¡ -I (10.24 Ac) 1 <10.25 Ac) 1 I I I I I 1 I 1 1 I 1 I I I I (9.5~ .. " :: (9.86 Ac) , '! , ; (8.50 Ad (9.8~ Ac) ~ II .~, - - .. .. ~ J I J j t I : r :~ I . .. 12 "! (8.91 Ad (8.80 Ac) ~.... '11.M '71.M ~7I..Jð 1 1__·22 I I I I I I I III : : ¡ w ~ 1 I I ~ ~ ~I ~I ;¡ ..~ b ~I ,. ~ ð _I IS g r I (9.55 Ac) I (9.56 Acl I (8.21 Ac) I I I ¡#'-<JOJ+<)()()/7J I I I I .' L 35.61 Ac 1 I I I ~"O~ I I 170. 61:).61 \ 572. Z337.JC11 c::¡ 172 I "I.M ~ ~. S\ S\:.. STATE Z_.:\Z ROAD NO. 712 .. :: ~F-~:--~~-~~-i------~~~------i::----~:-----~~-----~~---~--èF . .. ~ a (8.29 Ac) IIÌ '" '" ci z I!: II> .. '" ":1 ~ ~ T~. 36S.-RNG. 39E. NORTHWEST QUADRANT 'TWP.35S.-RNq",39E. ST. LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA o I MilES I 1/2 o 880 1320 1980 2840 TW~. 35S.-RNG. 39E.' ,;,. J ..r ¡ ,;.. 1 : .RU-M":R INC : . .3"....,. ··-r'··· \..\--. : 76.16 : !I ~ Ij > ' ..;.... ! IIÌ '" .., 0.......£\ C....PSCU,..i. EVANS PROPERTIES. INC. CHARLES CAMPBELL. Jr. 6718 58.77 SHIRLE Y L. & O.R. MIN raN ;).57 '46.9 125.9 ,; . 79.17 6 REBS GROVES. INC. :z:"',.. ji:;~ ~-o( .."" ... Q erb~ ....",,\oJ :;:!~2 X 0( '" 5 GRAVES BROTHERS CO. JOHN T. BRENNAN D.L SCOTTO CO. INC. LTC .oN1 ICtI\JRt ..--.... 56.71 <O.J7 TETLEY GROVES. INC. 150.23 150.7 " ~4 N 77.64 ¡¡, o N '" ~. .~ "'u ,¡; :::> IX D. L. SCOTTO ð< CO. INC. TETLEY GROVES INC. GRAVES BROTHERS CO. 39.73 LTC JOIN T VEN lURE .. or '" " 0( ... .. .. '" , ,18.69 19.H 8U 77. 24 ~ Z 0( a: c oC ~ C .. or .. o c ... .. .. '" D. L. SCOTTO & CO. INC. CECIL & MARGARET TALBOT J6.87 , '" I~~;:¡:~: 1C:U1 %-- ,O~ ~æ Xo WJ,'4: t iÎi5 ªu ,9 FOR OOX INVEST\.IENTS 153.41 38.78 77.53 ~ a:: ~ .. 0 _ .... ZN "'z ~a ~ VIRGIL GOTTAROO 38.5 7 HURLEY ROUN TREE 38.78 D. L. SCOTTO & CO. INC. D. R. w. CARl. TON 36.18 DUNN BROTHERS INC. 36.1B 77.22 D. L SCOTTO & CO. INC. , ~ R.&.L. LINQSEY. ~ ~; ~ '.- P..sc.J. PARTEE. . ð V' ,.. ~ C.&.P. HA'~S 'f5 ~ § ;:; 38.48 I t;) 5 ::g P.B. ~ GREENHQUSE. INC 20.87 CODY L. & CAROL YN A BAILEY 16.07 73.76 319.58 ROBERT &< CAROL PENDLETON 38.66 CHARLES COLE GROVES. .INC. 114.91 39.10 38.72 CHARLES COLE CROvES. INC. JAMES O. NELSON O. J. VACHON 19.6 .l)S(PM NOCLI:£~. ctRQNtWO 0.&.0 N()(LK( ,CROI(S 18.79 ~ ROBERT & LYNN UNOSE Y D L. SCOTTO & CO. INC. 39.12 38.92 BERNARD A. EGAN GROVES. INC. 7B.57 LTC JOINT VENTURE CHARLES COLE CROVES. INC. 76.3 NAVAJO GROvES INC. 29.62 OVIDE J. Sr. , . AN TDINE TTE , VACHON D. L. SCOTTO &< CO.. INC. 142.73 J <0 '" 01 z ~ ui tþ '" ..: ~ ~ " SOUTHWEST 75.81 36.01 36.49 PATSY 1(, N£LSON _ _9.71. 16 17 ~ ~ ~ .. is ~ ~ æ ~ - ~ 2z~ III ~?: ; ,,-' U 0~ TWP. 36S.-RNG. 39E.' - 18 ROBERT HESTER III sr ALLS FRUIT CO. ~ EVANS PROPERTIES. INC. 10M3 77.~8 17.55 BERNARQ A. EGAN GROVES. ttlC ÓJl.2~ 145.09 ItlC Ii: 0:: ~ 0( '. :z'" :::>'" IX QUADRANT SEE PAGE 48 OF EDSALL· GROVES. BERN ARC A. EGAN GROVES. INC. 64.97 56.07 ø 199~. fLORIO'" PlAT"S 46 '-" ..." This instrument prepared by: Janet LiCausi, under the direction of Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 RESOLUTION NO. 04-28 DATE: January 6, 2004 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, CLOSING, VACATING AND ABANDONING ANY INTEREST OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC IN ALL THAT PART OF UNIMPROVED 30 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING BETWEEN LOTS 2,3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14, AND 15 IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 30, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. That Sections 1 77.101, 336.09 and 336.10, Florida Statutes, a s a mended, and Section 11.10.01 et. seq. of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, provide that the County may adopt resolutions vacating rights-of way in whole or in part, which are under the jurisdiction of the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida. 2. Pursuant to Plat Book 3, Page 30, St. Lucie County and the general public have a dedicated interest in the following described land: UNIMPROVED 30 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING BETWEEN LOTS 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14, AND 15 IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT 1 '-' ..., THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 30, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. 3. The abandonment of this unimproved, an unopened, un-maintained right-ofway will allow the property owners to develop their property on either side of this platted right-of way. 4. A Notice of Intent to Abandon was advertised on August 12 and August 19, 2003. No objections were filed. 5. All relevant public utilities have given written consent for the abandonment. 6. On December 9, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners approved Permission to Advertise for a Public Hearing on January 6, 2004. 7. On December 19, 2003, letters weremailedtoallpropertyowners.lying within 300 feet of proposed abandonment area and no objections were filed. 8. On December 19, 2003, a Notice of Public Hearing was advertised in the Ft. Pierce Tribune. 9. At the January 6, 2004 Public Hearing, the Board determined that it is in the best interest of the public to vacate and abandon the right-ofway more particularly described as follows: UNIMPROVED 30 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING BETWEEN LOTS 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14, AND 15 IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 30, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. 2 '-' .."J NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: That unimproved, unopened platted right-ofway in Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 39 East which is more particularly described as follows: UNIMPROVED 30 FOOT RIGHT-OF-WAY LYING BETWEEN LOTS 2, 3, 6, 7, 10, 11, 14, AND 15 IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF SECTION 4, TOWNSHIP 36 SOUTH, RANGE 39 EAST, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 3, PAGE 30, OF THE PUBLIC RECORDS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. is hereby closed, vacated and abandoned and the right, title and interest of St. Lucie County and the general public in and to said lands hereby disclaimed and renounced. Chairman Paula Lewis Vice-Chairman John Bruhn Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Cliff Barnes Commissioner Doug Coward PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 6th day of January, 2004 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ATTEST: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: DEPUTY CLERK BY: COUNTY ATTORNEY 3 '-' ,Œ©ŒUJŒ!mi ! OCT 2 0 2003 I , I ¡ i_~ 1 PROPERTY ACQUISIT~ON ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PETITION FOR ABANDONMENT TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS, ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA. i'! The undersigned PETITIONER hereby petitions the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners to vacate, abandon, discontinue and close, in whole or in part, specific public rights-of-way, easements, or subdivision plats, as more particularly described in this petitiòn, and to renounce and disclaim any right of the County and the public in and to any land in connection therewith. This petition is filed pursuant to law as more particularly set forth in Florida Statutes, Section 177.101, as amended, Florida Statutes, Sections 336.09 and 336.10, as amended, and St. Lucie County Land Development Code, Section 11.10.01 et. seq. ********************************************************************************************* TYPE OF ABANDONMENT REOUESTED . \ ~\ (check one or more as applicable) ("*" indicates requirement for public hearing) _ A Plat (*) ~ A Portion of a Plat (*) _ County Road Right-of-way (*) _ Drainage Easement not Affecting Road Drainage _ Public Utility Easement _ Drainage Easement Affecting Road Drainage (*) Other _ Public Interest in a Private Right-of-way or Easement ********************************************************************************************* Petitioner hereby certifies that the filing fee of $250.00 is enclosed or has been paid to St. Lucie County, and that petitioner hereby further certifies that petitioner understands that the filing fee is non-refundable and that there is no assurance that this petition will be granted, in whole or in part, and no such assurances have been made by any County employee. j SL AS '-' ..".¡ This Petition shall contain an affidavit of the Petitioner attesting to the validity of the representations herein and it's completeness to the best of Petitioner's knowledge and belief. 1. The Legal Description of the petition site is attached as (EXHIBIT II A"). (Note: The petition site may lie upon property owned by Petitioner, i.e. an easement over Petitioner's property, or adjacent to Petitioners property, i.e. a public road right-of-way.) 2. Title or interest of the County and the Public in and to the petition site was acquired and is evidenced by: 1914 Plat of Subdivision of Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 39 East (Plat # and identification, Deed, or other title evidence) Plat Book 3, Page 30 recorded in: (plat Book and Page, Deed Book and Page, or Official Record Book and Page) Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. 3. Attachèd hereto as (EXHIBIT "B") is a sketch, accurately drawn, depicting the petition site as described in (EXHIBIT ItAIt), showing boundaries of abutting properties, any encroachments, drainage and/or utility easements, any structures within the petition site, and property benefiting from the abandonment. A copy of a portion of the appropriate tax map (8 Y2 x 11), obtainable from the Property Appraisers Office, may be used for this purpose. 4. Attached hereto as (EXHIBIT "C") is a location map which clearly and legibly identifies the location of the petition site in relation to the nearest public right-of-way and all affected properties (properties within a minimum 300 foot radius of the petition site). A copy ofa portion of the appropriate tax map (8 Y2 xII), obtainable from the Property Appraisers Office, may be used for this purpose. . \ ~\ 5. Attached hereto as (EXHIBIT liD ") is a list of property owners, including correct mailing addresses, property tax Identification number and legal descriptions of surrounding affected properties. (Note: County Staff may request additional information if it is determined that the proposed abandonment could have a negative effect on properties located more than 300 feet from the petition site.) 6. Attached hereto as (EXHIBIT liE ") is a list of abutting property owners, including correct mailing addresses, property tax Identification number and legal descriptions of the adj acent properties. Such owners of abutting properties have signed a notarized statement consenting to the abandonment of public right-of- way and such signed statements are attached hereto as (EXHIBIT "E-l ". "E-2 ". etc.) 7. Attached hereto as (EXHIBIT "F"). consecutively numbered "F-l ". "F-2 ". etc.. the signed consent of any affected utility providing service to or within the petition site and/or drainage district having jurisdiction over the petition site. 8. The Petitioner hereby certifies that in the event this petition is granted, the abandonment of the public right- of-way will not prevent other property owners from access to and from their property, and no other property owner in the vicinity will be adversely affected. '-' ...." 9. The Petitioner hereby certifies that the petition site is not a right-of-way which is part of or used for any State of Federal highway purposes; and that such right-of-way is under the control and jurisdiction of the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners. 10. The Petitioner hereby certifies that the petition site is not a public accessway to any publicly accessible waters in the County, or that if the petition site proposed to be abandoned does provide such access, Petitioner hereby offers to trade or give the County comparable land or lands necessary for public access to the same body of water. 11. The petitioner hereby certifies that petitioner is the owner of property underlying or adjacent to the petition site as evidenced by an instrument recorded in Official Record Book1564 , Page ~, St. Lucie County, Florida, a copy of which is attached as (EXHIBIT "G ")~ 1739, 1741, 1743 & 1745 12. The petitioner hereby certifies that all property taxes upon the Petition site, or petitioner's property adjacent to the petition site, are paid and current, or exempt from taxation, and a copy of a paid tax bill or statement of the County Tax Collector is attached hereto as (EXHIBIT "H"). 13. The Petitioner hereby certifies: (CIRCLE "a" OR "b" BELO"V) @ that the petition site to be abandoned is NOT within the limits of any municipality, OR b) that the petition site to be abandoned lies within the corporate limits of and attached is their resolution of abandonment of the petition site as (EXHIBIT "I"). 14. The Petitioner hereby submits a statement (EXHIBIT "J") in support of this petition which states Petitioner's reasons for requesting the abandonment and the use to which the Petitioner intends for the land. 15. Petitioner hereby certifies that a NOTICE OF INTENT TO FILE A PETITION FOR ,¡, ABANDONMENT has been published once weeklv for two (2) consecutive weeks in a newspaper of general circulation in the County. The name ofthe newspapèr and dates of publication are as follows: ';.FortPierce and Pt. St. wcie Tribune (Name of newspaper in which Notice of Intent was published) 8/12/2003 (First ijate published) 8/19/2003 (Second date published) A COpy OF THE PROOF OF PUBLICATION SHALL BE ATTACHED TO THIS PETITION AS (EXHIBIT "K"). NOTICE TO PETITIONER: IF THE ABANDONMENT REQUESTED REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT TO LAW, PETITIONER SHALL BE GIVEN NOTICE TO POST A SIGN (17" x 24" OR 17" x 17") UPON THE PETITION SITE IN A CONSPICUOUS AND EASILY VISIBLE LOCATION, ABUTTING A PUBLIC THOROUGHFARE, WHEN POSSIBLE, AT LEAST TEN (10) DAYS PRIOR TO THE PUBLIC HEARING GIVING NOTICE OF THE TIME AND DATE OF THE PUBLIC HEARING ON THE PETITION TO ABANDON OR VACATE. '-' .." . DATE: THIS PETITION MUST BE EXE UTED BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC 5- LO-03 Petitioner' signature Phì ilì( r'vt. Dmw~ Type or print Petitioners name .2Q45 W. mìdwtUj Y2J Petitioners Address· p+ ' P¡eýc.e FL 3fq~ I . c12- 4(04 - <?I too COUNTY OF 9-. lUL(--t., STATE OF @ vlO'( ~ JA Before me this day personally appeared ~'I III f says: Petitioner's Phone Number. M· urn4 who, being duly sworn, deposes and That he. is(are) the Petitioner(s); and, That all of the representations and information provided in the petition is true and accurate to the best of Petitioners knowledge, information and belief. SUbp~bed "!If sworn !j ,~or affirmed) before me this 2èf.ìay of M-~ . 20.Q2 by Ph', IIì P M ( J,J.ra.v. )4 _ ~personally appeared before me and j.¿"who is personally known to me. _ whose identity I proved on the basis of _ whose identity I proved on the oathlaffinnation of . a credible witness .¡, ÇÞ;;Mck~ Notary ~Ublic . . "'~I'';A;'r;:,t¡¡,., Elizabeth K Jorgensen it: ':*~ MY COMMISSION II DDOm07 EXPIRES ~;;"."..ò~~! January 25, 2006 ",.'/r.,r,;..' BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE INC , . \.f .....I DATE: THIS PETITION LVIUST BE EXECUTED BEFORE A NOTARY PUBLIC j~:' ::2 2. -ð3 COUNTY OF ~. cuM ¿ vloYì d£L ~p~.~ etltlOner S sIgnature ' --rrfJ~ Drww~ Type or t Petitioners n 20(45 WI mìdwª=Ð eJ . Petitioners Address· 0-, P; £,(c -e I r::c , It ~ --4tol/ -~ ( ~Ò Petitioner's Phone Number, 3<+Cfg' I " . STATE OF Before me this day personally appeared /(-0 ~ "Drttvu ct~ says: who, being duly sworn, deposes and That h. ¿ is(are) the Petitioner(s); and, That all of the representations and infonnation provided in the petition is true and accurate to the best of Petitioner's knowledge, infonnation and belief. . Subscribed and ~m to (or affirmed) before me tbi~y of _~ ' 2~ by _T re-î .' X tt-lAJ--(. \ _ ~o personally appeared before me and -l,L'Who is personally known to me. _ whose identity I proved on the basis of _ whose identity I proved on the oath/affinnation of . acredible witness ~~jMb=l!~ Not Public . /Â.~A·"'~ft.~.. Elizabeth K Jorgensen ?! !*1 MY COMMISSION # DD079507 EXPIRES ~;;,.....~o/ January 25, 2006 "',9f"f,;.·· BONDED THRU TROY FAIN INSURANCE,INC '-' ...." EXHIBIT "A" Type the legal description of the petition site here Unimproved rigþt of way lying between l.Dts 2,3,6,7, 10, 11, 14 and 15 in the N:>rthwest 1/4 of the Subdivision of Section 4, Ta.vnship 36 South, Range 39 .East; according to the Plat thereof as recored in Plat Book 3, Page 30, of the Public Records of St. Wcie County, Florida. ~\ '-' .....J EXHIBIT "B" Draw an accurate sketch of the petition site and abutting properties, if applicable, or attach a Boundary Survey (preferred) SEE A'ITACHED . \ ~1 '\ '. '." ., , t¡.'.- 'ß" ~ _I "è" ." ~ : ~. î ;: -:-, . \' í,'J ,~ . ~ S' ~ f ~ ? ~. ~ ~a... f ~ , .. ~~~ . '~~ 1 l! ~... ~': .,. ..t¡:~ .... .,.. t ~ " ~ Ã. ~ t r'-~~·~· '" ~ -. ) 1· ~ ~. ¿..:-.~. ~ fn ~ a "'.:D'\ i; ..r ~ a .11';1'.<1 k . \I~' ~ ~~a~ tbo¡¡¡ . ~.. i:-~ -: Q .,. . ~ l1" ~ ~ ',,- ". · 'I:t ., .:. :_..... '0"'._ ___ '-' -V.- , , - ..,..... ,.~. ..." I..: ... ',' .~ ì; ¡, ~ : '. ,,J c, . ¡ .' i- I . ---r7---:r----í--~--1 ~ I ~ I cr- ¡ QA I · I· ~'I · I' . ----__1______ ~ __~---~ 1 I ',. I . I. I I ... J. . , I 1 ~ 1.-' ~ I ~ /II, · ..., I I '. ·1 · r I' I ,... I ~. I J --- ---+------,-------1------ . I 'I I ,. . ., I I I , 00 I I ID 1- I ,I, I I I . J ~ , j J \ .I 1 ~. CIt I ;.. ~ I, I 1 . . ' I·, I - - --+ ...;----t- ----+- --- I , J I' , I 'I . I·~ ~ ¡ ~ ~:I'" I g I . I ,I , ' I . -:----~----r -t"---- I I .' ).. " r" I'· "~ f ~ I / ~ J " . I I: . I I .: , --.-:---t------¡-- -~--r ---:-0:., I 1- 1 I '" I . CI:I I I /, I I I &3 r ".. ..' ~ IV .' " ~ .. ,..' ..." '-¡;;---I' r;:-:- . I .... I J r - iii .: _...~ . I ~ I ../ I I I -- ---:-- --1-- - ---t-- - --...L. - -- -_ 1 I I I .', I I ... I ~I cr. I .,. I .... I ' I I '1 I 11, . I , 0 '( I. ~ ,. CI:I , I ;' 11'- I , I'. .... , I I . III I:." I G" I . t- I I " I . I . , , I'. I I . -----~~---J--~~-~----- . I I' I I I I ;. I ~ I a'\ I C)I "'1 .I'~¡ I' - .. I' -'---t~"- ¡ -----l---·~- .\ '''!o, ·1 ..... I" <'\ I' - : .... I rt ì: ., ' I I I I I I. 0 ---~·-r~-:---r~---_r---'"7-1 . 1.1"1 ... I I I " 11\ I 'tJ : 01 I .... ~ I . . I III I' I=.: ' . ~-' h' c' ,. ~\ .J I·' .' " \ . , .. .{ \ - , ,;. .. ; . '~f' .',; " ,. . "':,..... " . .. !... .' "'.: . ' .. j " ~·..'~t.. ... . .~ ,. ~. .~ . ..: ;., '. ~. .. ..t' .~ .. ';"'1 ",.., ... : 1-':· :.':'. .. ..,.......: . .1 . ,.·f ',' " ~ .,,' . . .. . . " , . , ;·VJ '. .. , < , "~'-, ~ G '\ ' . ' , I . \ ,!'. 'o¡' . '. \' ...oC I . ' ¿'1 ':} .:.' .:.":':; ;.: ',~,::'.::2.~....; ',. .. EXHIBIT "B" 1D ABANIXN1ENT PETITION '-' ....J EXHIBIT "C" Sketch or attach a location map here SEE ATIACHED , \ ~I . . ., ~\ '" ...., EXHIBIT "D" Type or print name, address, property identification number, and legal description of surrounding affected properties here I OWner Name and Address I Tax 1. D. Number and Property Legal Description RU-MAR, INC., A Florida Corporation Lots 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12 of the Northwest 1/4 of the , Subdivision of Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 39 East, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat :&:x:>k 3, Page 30, Public Records of St. liJcie County, Florida Paul Freeman Tax I.D. 2333-334-0000-000/5 3900 Hollywood Blvd. 33 35 39 That part of S 1/2 of SW 1/4 lye Hollywood, FL 33201 East of 11 rilile Creek D.L. Scotto and Co, Inc. SiD of all 4-36-38 Lots 1 to 16 incl. in SW P.O. Box 1017 1 /4 Less Road and Canal R/W Ft. Pierce, FL 34954 . NOTE: ATTACH ADDITIONAL SHEETS AS NECESSARY. IMPORTANT: IN ANY PROCEEDING WHICH REQUIRES A PUBLIC HEARING, PETITIONER SHALL PROVIDE PRE-STAMPED, PRE-ADDRESSED ENVELOPE AND CERTIFIED MAIL RETURN RECEIPTS TO ST. LUCIE COUNTY WHICH 'WILL BE USED TO' PROVIDE NOTICE OF THE SCHEDULED PUBLIC HEARING TO EACH OF THE ABOVE PROPERTY OWNERS. \r' .....I EXHIBIT "E" (list of abutting property owners) I Owner Name and Address I Tax 1. D. Number and Property Legal Description Ru-Mar, Inc. Lots 1-1 2 of the Northwest 1 /4 of the Subdivision of Section 4, Township 36 South, Rand 39 East, according to the plat thereof as recorded in Plat BOok 3, Page 30, Public Records of st. Lucie Count)Y I FL . > ,\ ~\ '-' ....I CONSENT AGREEMENT This Agreement is entered into thi~ay of IJ!3:¡ , 2003 by and between PlllLLIP M. DRAWDY and TROY W. DRAWDY ( Drawdy") and RU-MAR, INC. ("Carlton"); WHEREAS, Drawdy owns the following property: Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16 in the Northwest !j.¡ of the Subdivision of Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 39 East, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 30, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; and WHEREAS, Carlton owns the following property: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4,5,6, 7,8,9, 10, 11 and 12 in the Northwest !j.¡ of the Subdivision of Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 39 East, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 30, of the Public Records of St. Lucie Co~nty, Florida; and WHEREAS, the Plat recorded at Plat Book 3, Page 30, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" ("The Plat") purports to depict a right-of-way and/or easement which has not be constructed upon lying on each side of the lot line between Lots 2 and 3,6 and 7, 10 and 11, and 14 and 15; and WHEREAS, the parties are desirous of extinguishing said right-of-way and easement and have executed and exchanged Quit Claim Deed Releasing Rights to Platted Right of Way to effectuate this; and WHEREAS, Drawdy intends to take all steps necessary to obtain the approval of St. Lucie County to the abandonment, vacating and extinguishment of the unconstructed road right-of-way and easement depicted The Plat following such procedures as are specified by St. Lucie County; and WHEREAS, Carlton is desirous of executing an instrument to evidence Carlton's consent to said county procedures. NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the sum of Ten and No/100 Dollars ($10.00) and for other good and valuable consideration the receipt and sufficiency of which is hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: ,\; 1. Consent. Carlton does hereby irrevocably authorize Drawdy to execute and fIle with St. Lucie County, such forms, petitions, documents and applications as are necessary to comply with the St. Lucie County requirements to abandon, vacate and extinguish the unconstructed roadway and easement referenced above and Carlton does further agree to execute such other and further documents as may be required by St. Lucie County to effectuate the same including a joinder in any replat of the property that Carlton and Drawdy own. Carlton does hereby irrevocably consent to 81. Lucie County abandoning, vacating and extinguishing said unconstructed roadway and easement. 2. Costs. Drawdy does agree to pursue all action identified above with St. Lucie County at Drawdy's sole cost and expense and waives any claim for contribution for fees, costs and expenses for the same against Carlton. prinredMm, ~ ~ !-~RA~~f f1.~?~T~D~~ '-' .....I RU-MAR, INC., A Florida corporation /~~- STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE Sworn to and subscribed befor. e me this 'Jlf- day of . fY1ÛÝI, 2003 by PHILLIP M. DRAWDY and TROY W. DRAWDY who are: ~ known to me; or _ who produced as identification. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE ~:¿~~mt~ My commission expires: .,{;;'~'fj;'..., Elizabeth K. Jorgensen ¡:fC:'f.\ MY COMMISSION I OD079507 EXPIRES \~:'ð.iI'j January 25. 2006 "~~~Rf.:r.-~., soNOfD I'HrU TlOY ~AlH IN$UI.\t4Cf, tNC. Sworn to and subscribed before me this -ª..th.. day of Mav R. Wayne CARLTON who is: Jggg personally known to me; or produced as identifi . on. ,2003'by who has uÞt- ~\\\\'\lIII"/1111 ~"" ?,Ity Arefll1/,/~ ~ ........ t ~ ~ .~~~\A\SSOt\l~·... ~ .:¡o .' <f' ø.r 1~ ~ . :,::. ~ I § l$J'" ~~'.. ~ ª*: . ......... :*~ ~ ð \ ICC967804 .: "" i ~~.. L.. :f;j::: ~~,'. 4..~~ .'R:'~ ~ "",.q,~~'''''ßIP.:-.·'~~ ~",:8(iè'ši ¡.¡~ a\",~ 111/1111111111\\\\\ 11/05/03 WED 14:20 ~~ 4644595 DRAWDY BROTHERS e8/ø5/?~~ 19:15 5614896224 ST LUCIE SVC CTR 11/0£/03 TUB 08:4$ PAl 48(4595 DRAWDY BROTHBRS ..." ~ 002/007 PAGE el I(I,UUIo/UUI EXHIBIT "F..~" CCDDJlØt llttet tom aae.:'WI utility eo1!tpmy) ~ONS.BNt' O~ ~n8TI!:IJ otl Arrr.CTED UTILr()"m'RAINAG~ ENTl')~ DATB il-(}f- ~()t) 3 r'/ð£ J/?A ¡jtvé.Jt f LltH¡- t.mLlTY COMPANY 330/ C¿I'#lÞF /!tI~ ADDUSS ñJf¿( /lé7tCC;~ Fe.. 3'1fll 7 crrY' J STATE ZIP . .....'" :. ~ lŒ: .Peúûcn to AbauðocJV&c&\O (D..œipcioD ofPetitiOJi Site eaciu.1d) 81:.1/£:111 #1"1 LtF $ 1'11¿J.ú),ff! ¡t(/? To Wham It Mly CQncem: . , Plea.se coamder thi. IettC II Out requelt far a LETTER. OP NO œ~TION to the ~",mAØt of'1b.e above xñcced ,ito. . ~ Buç1I;Sed. foJ' your ~iew is,. Øl:}V1 oft1!e lIIcøtGh ç,d ~r:ipticm o£th. site prOP\)lled. to bo abmdonld. A self· add1'ea.sec! ~YC1ope fa aha ~losc4fcr)'D1tt1'Çly, Jfyou have a.ay quesdGDI or ifI rIJI:j h. of 8u1ha' aainlDca, pl"I' C:ODIIOt IJ1I &t 'Thank you for your u.i.tl:z¡cc I.n ~ matt... SiuocIe1.y . . .. - (fctUionct Qr &þIt) Ene. . PlÛtloa llat.1WdI a« dtRriptlOJL ..........~.......~~........................................................... CC/DI=t &II tcsquCltcd : Conaent with tha rou~ ~ti.Dn.: ... .l Conunt Ref"wed . ^~W~~ æaø ~., 2¿¿ ~\ aNt! Q~~t=I~ \ot:SS:l!!t Ea. rZ J.,."'"Q Date: / /~()tj- .20tJ.:3 . ~'d '-" ....I EXHIBIT "G" Proof of ownership of petition site or adj acent benefiting property See Attached Deeds totalling 10 pages . \ ~¡ ~_. ....I JOANNE HOLMAN, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT - SAINT LUCIE COUNTY File Number: 2076452 OR BOOK 1564 PAGE 1739 Recortletl:08/08/02 10:30 ._~ , . TIll, ü"trum<nt W"' ß", by' SandraG. RennÍck, Esq. 979 Beachland Blvd. Vera Beach,FL 32963 * Doc Assump: $ * Doc Tax $ * Irìt Tax :$ 0.00 560.00 0.00 PARCEL ill NO. 3304-501-0034-000n PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED THIS INDENTURE is made this 1~ day of July, 2002, by and between JERRY THOMPSON POTEAT and JERIL YNN POTEAT BOCK, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of GUY E. POTEAT, deceased, GRANTOR, and PHILLIP M. DRAWDY and TROY W. DRAWDY, as tenants in common, whose address is: 2945 W. Midway Road, Fort Pierce,FL 34981, GRANTEE. é--- WITNESSETH: That WHEREAS, GUYE. POTEAT died àresident offudianRiverCounty, Florida, on May 11, 1998, seized and possessed of the real property hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, JERR YTIIOMPSON POTEAT and JERll.. YNNPOTEA T BOCK were appointed Co- Personal Representatives of the Estate of Guy E. Poteat by Order of the Circuit Court of Indian River County, Florida, Probate Division, in Case No. P-980331, dated June 23, 1998; and further, pursuant to that Order of . Authorization of Sale of Real Estate entered on July 16, 2002, in Case No. P-980331; and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable considerations paid to Grantor by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby grants, bargains and sells to Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the real property situate in St. Lucie County, Florida, described as follows: Lot 13, in the Northwest 1/4, of the Subdivision of all of Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 39 East, according to thè Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 30, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. ";j¡...'. :..~ TOGEfHER with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances belonging to orin any way appertaining to said real property. GRANTOR COVENANTS with Grantee that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey the property and Grantor warrants the title to the property for any acts of Grantor and will defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through, or under Grantor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, as personal representatives of the estate of said decedent, have executed this instrument under seal on the date aforesaid. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: 'D\\Y\ ~. ~'\J) , Print name: \110:\ e... NÃJIS c0ula)Jvh,~~ . . Printn?l1? ~lcifu~S>J Print nam . )tIIro~ ~N\llL ~~.~ . P nt ame: \Jlí \~(- .. . . \ e Thompson Poteat, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Guy E. Poteat, deceased· ymí Pot at Bock, as Co-Personal Representative o the Estate of Guy E. Poteat, deceased " \-c- OR BOOK 1564 PAGE 1740 ....I STATE OF GEÔ~GIA COUNTY OF lit ¡to.{ . ~h . I hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me third-if day of July, 2002, by JERRY TIiOMPSON POTEAT, as co-personal fepre~ntatia\~e estate 5GUY E. Poteat, dec. eased, and that he is personally known to me or presented ~ 0 PI a - I Yfi.i.. CVI1~ as personal identification. \\,,'1111""111 ",''" SOUr """ ,.' ...... \.:...._..... ft ~ '" .:.: ø:r-... -.. ~.:, ~ /" ." ~ ::: .' OTAo , ~ E ¡~ '1).-- ; (SeaID i ~ ª =c~ 'z<: %.~\ ,oUSUG / è.5l -=-,0··.. ... ~$ "....-;..¡" ... _...... ,,~O.:o ........ 0: ............. c;,.v,:'Ii "IIIIPUNT'l ",., IlIIIIllIlnlW) "r4 f7 5 W COitl,\1:SSION EXPIRES '1 ' cL'1- V· , {t~J ~lJk NÚ r otary Pub IC State of Georgia My Commission expires: q 41..[)5 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER I hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of July, 2002, by JERIL YN POTEAT BOCK, as co-personal representative of the estate of Guy E. Poteat, deceased, and that she is personally known tome or presented 1L- dIlÚI-/Á) L/<'.iAI)P , as personal identification. (Seal) " JlJDITII L KAY , lAY COMMISSION' DD 130046 EXPIRES: JuI'j 5, 2006 . eondId1t<UN_.............riI... ~/Jh ~ 1ÝÔ- Notary Pu Ii . State of Florida My Commission expires: .~ . '-"-- J9ANNE HOU1AN, CLERK OF THE CmC~IT COURT - SAINT LUCIE cou'Nt'y- FIle Number: _ 2Q7645J.OR BOOK 1564 PAGE 174 Recorded:08/08/92 10:30 . .If ~ * Doc Assump: $ - * Doc Tax : $ * Int Tax : $" 0.00 560.00 0.00 This instrument was prepared by: Sanctr:a G. Rennick, ESqçrø>' .... 979 Beachland Blvd. Vero Beach, FL 32963 PARCEL ID NO, 3304-501-0034-000n PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED THIS INDENTURE is made this ~ day of July, 2002, by and between JERRY THOMPSON POTEAT and JERILYNN, POTEAT BOCK, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of GUY E. POTEAT, deceased, GRANTOR, and PHILLIP M. DRAWDY and TROY W. DRAWDY, as tenants in common, whose address is: 2945 W.Midway Road, Fort Pierce, FL 34981, GRANTEE. WITNESSETH: That WHEREAS, GUYE. POTEAT diedaresidènt of Indi an River County,Florida, on May 11, 1998, seized and possessed of the real property hereinafter described; and ~REAS, JERR YTHONIPSONPOTEAT andJERll.. YNN POTEAT BOCK were appointed Co- Personal Representatives of the Estate of Guy E. Poteat by Order of the Circ~it Court o{Indian River County, Florida, Probate Division, inCase No. P~980331, dated June 23,1998; and further, pursuant to that Order of Authorization of Sale ofReal Estate entered on July 16,2002, in Case No. P-980331; and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable considerations paid to Grantor by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby grants, bargains and sells to Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the real property situate in St. Lucie County, Florida, described as follows: Lot 14, in the Northwest 1/4, of the SubdivisioIliof all of Section 4. Tow~ship 36 South, Range 39 East, according to the Plat thereof as recor!Íed in Plat Book 3, page 30, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. TOGETHER with all and singular the tenements, here<Íitaments, and appurtenances belonging to orin any . way appertaining to said real property. ¡, I GRANTOR COVENANTS with Grantee that Gran;tor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey the property and Grantor warrants the title to the propþrty for any acts of Grantor and will defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons clainúng by, through, or under Grantor. I ill WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, as pers9nal represe~tatives of the estate of said decedent, have executed this instrument under seal on the date afor~said. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: ~~ -(s\(' '( \ e... ~-\P Print name: \1\ (' r; Q.,. ÙJ.li¡ 5 erryThompson Poteat, as Co-Personal Represèntåtive of the Estate of Guy E. Poteat, deceased rilY,nn P teat Bock, as Co-Personål Representative of thé Estate of Guy E. Poteat, deceased Print name: SItN.W 10-J,NlC!¿ %Jh~.~ P 'nt ame: ~ oÍ1' .- \ " , I ,-,.~. I I I OR BOOK 1564 PAGE 1142 ...I STATE OF ~iJRGIA COUNTY OF n ¡ OY\ ¡ : /)lLIJ-l, I hereby certifythat the foregoin~ instrument was ackjt0wledged before me tlùs~ day of July, 2002, by JERRY THOMPSON POTEAT, as :co-personal rep~e§eIl¡ta' e ol the estat of Guy E. Poteat, deceased, and that he is personally known to me orprésented IG\ctl· I VEt$ " as personal identification. \\\'''"'''"'''1 ",\\ SOUr. II", --,-- ~\-....._"...,:!I$''9'''' § c:.:;.~.,~ '-",: ~-:;. f /~OTARy\ \ (~~i ~ Ls§ ~ ~'" ,oUBL\V i C!J': -; ~ \ ,0- 9: ~ ~~"'" ...... 0$ ", 1/ C·.........·· ç,. <¿; ...,- "'I'IIIOUNT'! "....,... III/jllllll!i~;)q-DS MY COMMISSiON EXPIRES ." . ""I !)1~·1 ~~Iw Notary Public State of GeQrgia My Commi&sion expires: q-é)q- 05 STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER I hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me tlùs ~ day of July, 2002, by JERll.. YN POTEAT BOCK, as co-personal representative of the estate of Guy E. Poteat, deceased, and that she is personally known to me or presented (}( .. J/l.ÚUA_' ÚfI é.hlLLL as personal identification. (Seal) ot Public e of Florida My Commission expires: .~ .AJI)ITH L KAY MY COMMISSION' DO 130346 EXPIRES: July 5. 2006 ----~ ~-~OANNE HOLMAN, CLERK OF THE CIRCU~T COURT - SAINT LUCIE COUN~ File Number: 2076454 OR BOOK 1564 PAGE 1743 Recorded:08/08/02 10:30 * Doc ASSUffiP: $ * Doc Tax $ * Int Tax $ 0.00 560.00 0.00 This instrument was prepared by: Sandra G. Rennick, ES;r'. ~ 979 Beachland Blvd. Vero Beach, FL 3296 PARCEL ill NO. 3304-501-0034-000/7 PERSONAL REPRESENT A TlVE'S DEED THIS INDENTURE is made this 21- day of July, 2002, by and between JERRY THOMPSÓN POTEAT and JERlLYNN POTEAT BOCK, as Co-personal Representatives of the Estate of GUY E. POTEAT, deceased, GRANTOR, and PHILLIP M. DRAWDY and TROY W. DRAWDY, as tenants in common, whose address is: 2945 W. Midway Road, Fort Pierce, FL 34981, GRANTEE. WITNESSEfH: That WHEREAS, GUY E.POTEA T died a resident of Indian River County, Florida, on May 11, 1998, seized and possessed of the real property hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, JERRY THOMPSON POTEAT andJERll.. YNNPOTEATBOCK were appointed Co- Personal Representati ves of the Estate of Guy E. Poteat by Order of the Circuit Court of Indian River County, Florida, Probate Division, in Case No. P-980331, dated June 23,1998; and further, pursuantto that Order of Authorization of Sale of Real Estate entered on July 16, 2002, in Case No. P-980331; and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable considerations paid to Grantor by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby grants, bargains and sells to Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the real property situate in St.Lucie County, Florida, described as follows: Lot 15, in the North west 1/4, of the S ubdi vision of all of Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 39 East, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 30, of the Public Records of S1. Lucie County, Florida. TOGETHER with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances belonging to orin any way appertaining to said real property. .' GRANTOR COVENANTS with Grantee that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey the property and Grantor warrants the title to the property for any acts of Grantor and will defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through, or under Grantor. INWITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, as personal representatives of the estate of said decedent, have executed this instrument under seal on the date aforesaid. Signed, sealed and deli vered in the presence of: .~ 1),(ï t R-; ~~ Print name: \H \J( ¡ Q... 1'aNf s ~~t~}!~~~d~pr Print n,,"~~1øJiJl(¡: ~¡µ. ~.~ pt '"'" ~ .y; ..) e Thompson Poteat, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Guy E. poteat, deceased lynn Pot at Bock, as Co-Personal Representative o the Estate of Guy E. Poteat, deceased \..t--- .....I OR BOOK 1564 PAGE 1744 STATE OF GE.fIGIA . COUNTY OF Y\ t 1M y /)LJ~/~ I hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me thi~ day of July, 2002, by JERR Y THOMPSON POTEA T, as. co-persJ;:Ïep~e~ntatiJ)0f ~e estate rJGuy E. Poteat, deceased, and that he is personally known to me or presented ar{l oCt ( I vens CeM æ as personal identification. ___9daJ &~¿tf1 \\\,\lU'IIIII, è'\\\ SOUr I"",.. __- ~ ;::....__...I-¡ ~ I,; $ 0.,- ....._~ ~ ... .... ~ f /~OTAl1y\ \ (!ìcJ) ~ ) <ª ~-;\ ,cUsUv i è5š -;.. ,......) 'f ", r¡..,,~ ":-"...1..... ,,' 0"'"" "',.S' -" .... 1',,' " I'~ c·······.. 0v" "",,9UN'í'f \\\\\\' /1/11111111'11'...."" () r ~rfCOÌF!M:SSC¡'¡ EXPl!\çs~ 5 Notary Public State of Georgia My Commission e¡cpires:· q~:2q-os STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER I hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of July, 2002, by JERIL YN POTEAT BOCK, as co-personal representative of the estate of Guy E. Poteat, deceased, and that she is personally known to me or presented ~ L d/I J ¡ÜA.- {ur ¡AI .11 .R ~ as personal identification. (Seal) JIOmt L KAY 6 MY COMMISSloJN I 00 13034 EXPIRES. Joiy 5. 2006 .I!<>f1dIIc!ThnI,....I'ff'l*""-- :t!";.J-h ~. <1<-,,/ Notary Pu . I--f"'Q . State of FI da . My Commission expires: "$1 ~- ..., ..' .' JOANNE HOLMAN, CLERK OF THE CIRCUIT COURT - SAINT lUCIE COUNTY File Number: 2076455 OR BOOK ~564 PAGE 1745 Recorded:OB/OB/02 10:30 This instrument was prepared by: Sandra G. Rennick, Esq. - 979 Beachland Blvd. ~ Vero Beach, FL32963 '\ * Doc Assump: $ * Doc Tax : $ * Inflax-: $ 0.;00 560.00 - 0.00 PARCELID NO. 3304-501-0034-000n PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE'S DEED TillS INDENTURE is made this 2fJ"Y day of July, 2002, by and between JERRY THOMPSON POTEAT and JERlLYNN POTEAT BOCK, as Co-Personal Representativè~ of the Estate of GUY E. POTEAT, deceased, GRANTOR, and PHILLIP M. DRAWDY and TROY W. DRAWDY, as tenants in common, whose address is: 2945 W. Midway Road, Fort Pierce, FL 34981, GRANTEE. WITNESSETH: That WHEREAS, GUY E. POTEAT died a resident of Indi an River County, Florida, on May 11, 1998, seized and possessed of the real property hereinafter described; and WHEREAS, JERRY THO:MPS ON POTEAT and JERll.. YNNPOTEATBOCK were appointed Co- Personal Representati ves of the Estate of Guy E. Poteat by Order of the Circuit Court ofInclian River County, Florida, Probate Division, in Case No. P-980331, dated June 23,1998; and further, pursuantto that Order of Authorization of Sale of Real Estate entered on July 16, 2002, in Case No. P-980331; and in consideration of the sum of One Dollar ($1.00) and other valuable considerations paid to Grantor by Grantee, the receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, Grantor hereby grants, bargains and sells to Grantee, and Grantee's successors and assigns forever, the real property situate in St. Lucie County, Florida, described as follows: Lot 16, in the Northwest 1/4, of the Subdivision of all of Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 39 East, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 30, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. ì¡ TOGETHER with all and singular the tenements, hereditaments, and appurtenances belonging to orin any way appertaining to said real property. GRANTOR CO YEN ANTS with Grantee that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey the property and Grantor warrants the title to the property for any acts of Grantor and will defend the title against the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through, or under Grantor. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned, as personal representatives of the estate of said decedent, have executed this instrument under seal on the date aforesaid. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: Thompson Poteat, as Co-Personal Representative of the Estate of Guy E.Poteat, deceased -{jf~l (2... ~~ Print name: \tïCt ,- ~_ ~i s Ju~1\ì¡~ Print name: "R2 ~\.C+&CSt>rJ Print n~f')jj{¡[j( ~/HJ~~ P·n nome, ;¡;Ji,.h I .6r,~ \ '-'-~ ...,I OR BOOK 1564 PAGE 1746 STATE OF GEORGIA COUNTY OF Jj 11\' O't( . "Ht I hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was aclmowledged before me this~q day of July, 2002, by JERRY TIIO:MPSON POTEAT, as co-personal repr~(rtath~~f the estate of ctuy E. Poteat, deceased, and that he is personally known to me or presented 'f1 D1L \ G\ }-; Sè.ì V'éÀ5 Uf32At ~ . , as person!lÅIÜ~¡¡mif.ication. \\.\ "~. ,\,\ sOUT~ "'" ....,...... ~"""""'"'' ~.J'\ "" " r"..... '.::7 -, ~ v_~ . , ~ f /~OTAAy\\ \ - . ,-- .. =! eI:::1W 1 «: (S~ \. ..oUBL\V ./ 5J -" ~-" .., .. !:l::.. -:.0".0.11··.... ...·--/IO~$ " yc··..··..······ 0v~' "'11" °UNí'< \~t 1111111111111\\\ G¡....;{q-OS !0\'1' CO/;\M:SSiOtl8'J'\R~ - . --.. Mail ~~ Notary Public State of Georgia My Commission expires: q~q~{JS STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER I hereby certify that the foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day ofJuly, 2002, by JERIL YN POTEAT BOCK, as co-personal representative of the estate of Guy E. Poteat, deceased, and that she is personallyknownto me or presented '1(' dAÚJ.IA', &ß~ as personal identification. '¡¡ (Seal) No Sta fFlorida My Commission expires: \..r.-. -.I. JOANNE HOLMAN, CLERK OF THE. CIRCUIT COURT - SAINT LUCIE COUNTY File Number: 2076456 OR BOOK 1564 PAGE 1747 . Recorded:OB/OB/02 10:30 This instrument prepared by: Sandra G. Rennick, Esq. r 979 Beachland Blvd. Vero Beach, Florida 3296 . * Doc ASSUffiP: $ * Doc Tax $ * Int Tax : $ 0.00 0.70 O~OO PARCEL ill No. 3304-501-0034-000n GUARDIAN'S DEED THIS INDENTUREmadèthis . ~ ~ day of July, 2002, by ànd between JERIL YNN POTEAT BOCK, AS LIlVIITED GUARDIAN OF THE PROPERTY OF WILLIE FLORENCE POTEAT, whose mailing address is: 5020 Fairways Circle, #201,Vero Beach, FL 32967, as GRANTOR,and PHILLIPM. DRAWDY and TROY W. DRAWDY, as tenants in common, whose mailing address is: 2945 W. Midway Road, Fort Pierce, Florida 34981, as GRANTEE: WHEREAS, WILLIE FLORENCE POTEAT, was determined to be incapacitated pursuant to the Order Determining Limited Incapacity, dated July 20, 1999, entered in Case No. G98-100 &G98-101, In the Circuit Court of the 19"' Judicial Circuit, in and for Indian River County, Florida; and WHEREAS, JERll.. YNN POTEAT BOCK, was appointed limited guardian of the property of WILLIE FLORENCE P.OTEA T, pursuant to the Order Appointing Limited Guardian of Property, dated September 7, 1999, entered inCase No. G98-100 & G98-101, In the Circuit Court of the 19th Judicia! Circuit, in and for Indian River County, Florida. WITNESSETH that the Grantor,· for and in consideration of the sum ofTen Dollars ($10.00) and other good and valuable considerations to Grantor in hand paid by Grantee, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, has granted, bargained and sold to the said Grantee and Grantee's heirs and assigns forever, the following described land, situate, lying and being in St. Lucie County. Florida, to wit: Lots 13,14, 15 and 16, in the Northwest 1/4, of the Subdivision of all ofSection4,Township36 South,Range 39 East, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, page 30, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. '1\ Otherwise described as the South Y2 of the Southwest 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 and the South ¥2 of the Southeast 1/4 of the Northwest 1/4 of Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 39 East, lying in St; Lucie County, Florida. . SUBJECf to easements of record and taxes after 2001. TOGETHER with all tenements, hereditaments aT;ld appurtenances thereto belonging or. in anywise appertaining. GRANTOR COVENANTS with Grantee that Grantor has good right and lawful authority to sell and convey the property and Grantor warrants the title to the property for any acts of Grantor and will defend the title against . the lawful claims of all persons claiming by, through, or under Grantor. TO HA VB AND TO HOLD the same in fee simple forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the Grantor has caused this instrument to be executed on the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: PMre~tWNI;¿ ~fi~ p' d name~ .¡, t. . V POTEAT BOCK, Limited Guardian of the Property f Willie Florence Poteat ~ .. ~ OR BOOK 1564 PAGE 1748 ...I STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF INDIAN RIVER I hereby certify that on this day, before me, an officer duly qualified to take acknowledgments, personally . appeared JERIL YNN POTEAT BOCK, as Limi~d Guardi~n of the Property of Willie Florence Poteat, who is personally known to me or presented '9[" dA¡.JJ.IA 'Ú,f~~ as identification, and who executed the foregoing instrUment before me and did/did not take an oath. WITNESS my hand and official seal in the county and state last aforesaid, this ¡J.5' day of July, 2002. ~j-A v<. ~/ No .. ublic ... Stat lorida . My commission expires: JtJD!1i1L.KA~ . '. t.r( COMMISSION ~ {)D 130346 . ¡ EXPlflf:S July 5. 2CoC6 ..l ()ondI'i·rm;t.~t,:""v'IúÎl;~ (NOTAR '1 '- .....I EXHIBIT "H" Certification of taxes paid on petition site or adj acent benefiting property .~\ '-' ..., Page 1 of 1 CURRENT TAX ROLL· Parcel Display Return to list view <> New Search ParcellD: 3304-501-0034-000/7 Owner: Poteat (Est), Guy E 5945 20th St Vera Beach,FL 32966-1020 Legal: SID OF ALL 4-36-39 LOTS 13,14,15AND 16 IN NW 1/4-LESS RD AND CANAL RS/W- (35.61 AC) (MIDWAY) Assessment: $144,000 Taxable: $144,000 2002 Taxes $3,388.06 If Paid By: 01/31/03: $3,320.30 PAID Rec# 09-20030123-016795 Back Taxes Due: NO " httn'//?l n 77 1 194/tc/taxes/aulck tax.asu?vrDetailRec=3304-501-0034-00017 10/17/03 · , ~ EXHIBIT "I" Resolution of Abandonment by Municipality (Only if petition site is within a municipality) oor APPLICABlE ...., t4:j I . '-" ....., EXHIBIT "J" Petitioner's statement in support of granting petition The Petition is submitted to extinguish a "paper" easement that arises only because it is depicted graphically on the original 1914 plat of this property and although no express dedication exists theses old plats have been construed to create easements for ingress and egress or rights of way based on the graphics. No road improvements, drainage or any other structural improvement have been built or are contemplated to be built in this location and, accordingly, the extinguishment is sought by all affected property owners as is evidenced by the quit-claim deed releasing rights to platted right of way given by Messers. Drawdy to Rumar, Inc. for the lots which its owns and the corresponding quit-claim deed releasing rights to platted right of way from Rumar, Inc. to Messers. Drawdy which are attached to this Exhibit J and which are being recorded in the public reGords of St. Lucie County, Florida. . ., ~~ '-" ...." Return To and Prepared By: Douglas E. Gonano, Esq. Gonano & Harrell 1600 S. Federal Highway, Ste. 200 Ft. Pierce, FL 34950 (772 )464-1032 QUIT-CLAIM DEED RELEASING RIGHTS TO PLATTED RIGHT OF WAY THIS QUIT-CLAIM DEED, Executed this L day of fJuq-Ucsï' ,2003, by PHILLIP M. DRAWDY and TROY W. DRAWDY, whose post office address is 2945 W. Midway Road, Ft. Pierce, FL 34981, first party, to U-MAR, INC. whose post office address is 160 Lamont Road, Ft. Pierce, FL 34947, second party: (Wherever used herein the terms "first Party" and "second party" shall include singular and plural, heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, wherever the context so admits or requires) WITNESSETH, That the said first party, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 in hand paid by the said second party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quit- claim unto the said second party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of St. Lucie, State of Florida to wit: Lots 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 1 A, 11 and 12 in the Northwest y.. of the Subdivision of Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 39 East, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 30, of the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida The conveyance of the foregoing described property is intended to and shall be construed to constitute a conveyance, rèlease, relinquishment and remise unto the second party, forever, of all right, title, interest, and claim that the first party has or may have in and to any right of way for access, ingress, egress, drainage, and for any other purpose over, above, or under that unconstructed road right-of-way and easement that is depicted as existing between Lots 2 and 3, 6 and 7,10 and 11, of :¡; the aforegoing described property which is more particularly identified graphically on Exhibit "A" as attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The first party herein certifies that above described does not constitute the homestead of the first party TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefifand behoof of the said second party forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. resence of: ¡( pr~{~ rA~¡c r :)~ ~g~ TROY ~. DRAWD 2945 W. Midway Road, Ft. Pierce, FL 34981 ~ ....,j STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this ~ day of /} tot ri1.i8T , 2003, by PHILLIP M. DRAWDY and TROY W. DRAWDY, who is: ~ personally known to me, or _ who has produced s identification ~,,'i. (jfltis P ottar/I"I ~ ........... .,~ $' "~~\SS/ON¿" ~ g ..-: CJO -..o'\)er 8, <Î2 ~~... ~ : :~ cf ~f8,~ = =*= ..... :*= - . . - ~ --ð ~. #DD154527 : ~g ~/o a. "~$ ~~. ~~~ .'c§:'~ ~~ ,.. ...'7Fem-~.:-... ~ ~. '" ;OÚ.o····.···· (í .;,,':- ""lllldlle sn.i'é. \.", '11 ¡ "It )'1' ~\,\, [Notary Seal] ¡! . .- 'ft ~ ·1 ~" ~.. ~'. ,Z' 1'':'\1' ~ f., . . = ¡' } f ~ ~ '. ~ ~_ f a: q,' .. ~ r. ;:: , . ~~ 1 k 1: ~} ~(: '\ '., ,; ., ~ ''''~~ .'t '100 ¡~ r" ~ §. ~ ~ . \n ~ ~o :::: 1& ~ D '" 1:. }.~~, ~ ~ : . "..:;" ..... þ¡~ .Þ;f/ "f' ...;., ~ ~~a~ .. [b.'I!: ~ 1It~· !='~ -: \I .,. :¡: l 1" ~. ~ '..... '. ...~ ., ~:........... " ..__....- '-' ~ 'f-- I . ,.r f'~ I .. ... 'I ¡¡ ¡, ~ : '....1 ~ I. i- I ---r~--:r --- -r-----¡ ~ I ~ I eo-. I tII I ¡= I' ~: . I. . ----....-{.------ I . >:r --+- :--:..- I . I. I I . ... I· , . 1 I ~ I .-, ~ 1 ~ N. I ..., I 1".1 . : I' I ,.. I·' I J ------+------.-------~----- o I 'II ~ ' ., I I ~ I UI ¡~ I oø I .t. I I I I ,. ~ .,,' j " .... j J .1 : ~, " I ;a.. , I, I I . ., . I I 'I ----+...:----t-----+---- . I , J I I " . .... 1 I I' ~ ¡ .:::~:... I Q I . 0 I '. 'I I . -·~---¡----r.. -~---- I I .' 1.. r 0 " "~ f ~ r / "'" .1 . . I I· . . I" J . , ------I-------t---...:.--r---,....· I· . I 1 I :' . I .' 1_ I I. ~ I '" I: CI : " 6Sr I ".. ( ~ IV ,,0 .i .{ , . . ,;. .. . ..~' ·Il .' '" . "':.0." '. . ' , .., '~-r'~ ... I . J Will' I u...... . I I po I , I ..j I I· I -- -"'1' -- - "'--t- _.- --....J. - ---_ 1 I I 1 I I I' ~ 1 '1 I ,I 1 (,o¡ , ' ... to ~ (I I 1 .' , o J .~ I .' tI\ r. I .:. 1'. ..... , 'I I . CIì I:." ~ I I t I I " I . I ' . , I'. I I -----~----t--~~~~----- 1 I' I I I , ~ I ~ I a'\ I UI ..' I J I I . I 0 ::-i.~-. : . ----t~--- ¡ ~---1---·~- .\ .I I· I '~ ·1 ". I'., . «ì I., - I " I ,.. "I I J I ~ . I I I I - ---,-r-:--;---r-::-----t - ---:-- I ., ,. I" I I I " .~ I ·u '. 01 I .... . I I I ì:'l I' . I=. : ' ',,,,' I.- ~ .. ,. I,' " \ . . . . . , ",' . '.,' , . .. , -JIf.. '.t.. .. " . .' . :",t. i . \ ' ,;'. ..!.. .'.. . "\.. It. .1'& . . . . . ': ;., :- .~ ~ ,. . ':':: ;~. i:· :. :. .~ . ' '. ~, '. -1 . ,..... ..1 .'. ._."""._ , ~. .' ":.1. . ., j .' .'" ~ ...~ . ~..& ..:. ". ;...., ",..' ... . I \ . :.":,, .. "","'.,': ',. . r .f." ~\' .4 ' " " ~ .' , , . . , :,W " .. ,( . .. t» o '-' .,¡ . Return To and Prepared By: Douglas E. Gonano, Esq. Gonano & Harrell 1600 S. Federal Highway, Ste. 200 Ft. Pierce, FL 34950 (772)464-1032 OUlT-CLAIM DEED RELEASING RIGHTS TO PLAITED RIGHT OF WAY TIllS QUIT-CLAIM DEED, Executed this 8th day of May, 2003, by Ru-Mar, Iuc ., a Florida corp , whose post office address is ' first party, to PHILLIP M. DRAWDY and TROY W. DRAWDY, whose post office address is 2945 W. Midway Road, Ft. Pierce, FL 34981, second party: (Wherever used herein the terms "first Party" and "second party" shall include singular and plural, heirs, legal representatives, and assigns of individuals, and the successors and assigns of corporations, wherever the context so admits or requires) WITNESSETH, That the said first party, for and in consideration of the sum of $10.00 in hand paid by the said second party, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged, does hereby remise, release and quit-claim unto the said second party forever, all the right, title, interest, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the following described lot, piece or parcel of land, situate, lying and being in the County of S1. Lucie, State of Florida to wit: Lots 13, 14, 15 and 16 in the Northwest If.. of the Subdivision of Section 4, Township 36 South, Range 39 East, according to the Plat thereof as recorded in Plat Book 3, Page 30, of the Public Records of S1. Lucie County, Florida; and The conveyance of the foregoing described property is intended to and shall be construed to constitute a conveyance, release, relinquishment and remise unto the second party, forever, of all right, title, interest, and claim that the first party has or may have in and to any right of way for access, ingress, egress, drainage, and for any other purpose over, above, or under that unconstructed road right-of-way and easement that is depicted as existing between Lots 14 and 15, of the aforegoing described property which is :t'l more particularly iden1Ífied graphically on Exhibit "N' as attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference. The first party herein certifies that above described does not constitute the homestead of the first party. '"t TO HAVE AND TO HOLD the same together with all and singular the appurtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the estate, right, title, interest, lien, equity and claim whatsoever of the said first party, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the said first party has signed and sealed these presents the day and year first above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: orporation " '-' '. STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF St. Lucie '-' The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this 8 t h day of May R. Wayne Carlton , who is: ~ personally known to me, or _ who has produced [Notary Seal] ~\\\\\" '"'" ",/ ~",,, t'ò\W Arend/"II/. -§. ....... ( ~ ~ ..~~\SS/ON~··. ~ ~ ,"e"c §-'\Ier 16~'" ~ ~ . ~ .,),.'lJ '~~.... =- :~~ . ~ø: ª =*. ....... .*- - . . - ~~~. #CC967804.:~i ~~. . ~, ~"'-9'" ~lIoodtd"~ ..'~~ ~ r~ ·...~~:~-.·fc ~~ '/IIIPSlIC ST~í~ o~",,, 111111'/ '" 11\\\\\" , 2003, by :¡¡ , . o cO .. } \ ,. : j {V). : .. , ~.. ,,:-":7:-7¡'!"? ::':.~:,'.';'(~ ,\~ :\'¡.~.:' ~~ r 'r·'-· ~ ':::,; '~:'" 'i' '.' . " \). ," . . , I- .-' . - i' . , : \ J'" ,- 11.. .. .... ~ ,Þ ,'.... I { . .:. . ~... " ~. :" ~ .; ~ I 'i ~~~, ' ;:):3~ II ~ ~ =- j -.~ d', . ~ ~ ~ .s f I . ..0 -( GI 'J' ~ " ~ ~ i ~ I I. I, ! ~ .: "~r .~..:ft , i I ; I I. , . -----~-------~-~----+---~-- I ., ~I f' I I . I 'N I' ,,' : ~ ,_.1 ~ " I ! ~: ~':If . .. . . I I 1 . -~----r-- ------1------ I . . I I I . . I . . , ~ I ~ I ~ I t I I · I I - I I.· I I ., '1 ---..........-1._ ___ _ ~___~~____ I . I . "',;' ¡ , I 'I A' ", I ... I II) I ~. I ... ' I I,' : I I .. I . .." ~.. .." ~ . ". , . ,.,". .' . . .' 4d l . ¡ 'I ,." ., .... I 10. t .,. , .' I I . " I I. . I '1·. -.:..-- - +-----~...L_ -...:_.:.....1_'-___ I I I I 1 I I ~ .J I I. . I ~ ' I"'. . ~ I. ..... I " . If' ~ r ", ./ -~~-+--~~t:---- . .. to I. "-D I I ~ I I" I ... . I . I -----~-~~--~----~---~- I I I' . I ' ' '·L. I I .', I "I" I IA . I . I ~I I ~: ,I) I I ~.. I I I· I .'1 ~ .. " I ~ & I. ~ ...: ! .... I"" 8' I - " . I ' I' I. I . J . I I I ' -----'--·----t - ----1------ I ... .... I· I' \ I . , '. I" I ' I 1: III I to. I 0 I ~ , ... I .. . I f ,(I .. . I I I .. ~ - '\ ,. I I. r . I ,.... I -..II I I I I. I , I I L ---- -,-- ----I------~---- I I - J I 'I' I I ~ ~..u I ., r I I I ...." I .-, ~.-l_........... C) .. .... .."" -..~ .' ... , I ... ' : '. . .... . .' j' . . : .. ~ ~ . \ " !' ;.. ." i ,.' ,Þ .." ~ ...: co III 1ft -+ .... '" . ' I --=t- ----",", ~¥"-:"'7' ,. ~. '. ..... o¥ . ,. 'Ii 1J . 11'1 . .....~ .. III ~ ~ .~ ~, . ";-;.~Jq , III... .. ~ !." 1 1.0, ~ -, .. ... " II;' .¡ '4 "'" . - \If ~.t ? .~ ~ 4 ~ "1 if :~ .~ \i fIj 1i! ~ i"~ ~., . . ~ t:;!.~. ~~.. to ,. Jo :' \. . . '-" ...I' . . i .... EXHIBIT "K" (proof of Publication of Notice of Intent to File a Petition for Abandonment) '1 ... 'a.cRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS Fort Pierce Tribune Port St. Lucie Tribune 600 Edwards Road, Fort Pierce, FL 34982 AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION ~:&~ III SCRIPPS HOWARD STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF 5T. LUCIE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, S. Darlene Mailing, who on oath says that she is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Fort Pierce Tribune and the Port 51. Lucie Tribune, a daily newspaper published at Fort Pierce in 5t. Lucie County, Florida: that the attached copy of advertisement was publshed in the Fort Pierce/Port St. Lucie Tribune in the following issues below. Affiant further says that the said Fort Pierce/Port St. Lucie Tribune is a newspaper published in Fort Pierce in said St. Lucie County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been cOntinuously published in said St. Lucie County, Florida, daily and distributed in St. Lucie County, Florida, for a period of one year next preceding th~ first publication of the attached copy of advertisemen~ and affiant further says that she has neither paid or promised any person, firm or coporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Fort Pierce Tribune has been entered as second class matter at the Post Offices in Fort Pierce, 5t. Lucie County, Florida and has been for a period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Ad Pub Customer Number Date Copvline PO# DRAWDY BROTHERS 253196 8/12/2003 NOTICE OF INTENT NOTICE DRAWDY BROTHERS 8/19/2003 Subscribed and sworn to me before this date: ..."II"~ MARV T. BVRNE .:om~Y "~ Notary Public,~ ~ at F10rida $ ; "'~Aug2.2Oœ : . = My Commll8íóft ~ ~ß Commmlllion . 00132804 'Jo~~_ Bonded By National Notary Assn. .. - - 'I' """'" ¡\ " ~ -..I Agenda Request Item Number: MeetinQ Date: 5ì> Jan. 6, 2004 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ X ] [ [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 04-001, Amending the St. Lucie County Land Develo ent Code By Creating Section 10.01.10, Administrative Variances To Any Require Dimensional Requirement of this Code to Accomplish the Goals, Objectives and Po icies of the Comprehensive Plan and this Code BACKGROUND: Draft Ordinance 04-001 proposes to create a new section in our Land Development Code whereby additional authority to grant administrative variances would be given to the Community Development Director when owing to special conditions, the literal enforcement of the dimensional provisions of this Code would impose a condition whereby greater harm to the existing natural environment would be caused than might otherwise be achieved through the granting of limited relief from any such minimum dimensional standard, subject to the standards and procedures set forth in this section. In short, these amendments allow the County to grant relief from our various setbacks when it can be demonstrated that doing so would provide for less environmental damage than if the rule in question were strictly applied. It is the belief of the County that by creating a process where flexibility can be applied, we will wind up with better projects and impacts on the natural system will be minimized. It needs to be noted that in establishing this process, the Community Development Director is required to receive comment and recommendations from the following other Departments before any final decision is rendered; Public Works Director, County Engineer, Building Official, Fire Marshal, Environmental Resource Manager and any other appropriate County or State official relevant to the review of the application at hand. The maximum administrative variance that may be granted is 50% of the minimum requirements. Anything requested that is greater than this must be reviewed by either the Board of Adjustment or the Board of County Commissioners, as may otherwise be required. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: On December 16, 2003, the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency for St. Lucie County held a public hearing on this matter. At the conclusion of that hearing, the Board voted to recommend that the County Commission not approve Draft Ordinance 04-001 as drafted. The concerns cited by the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency were that they did not feel it was appropriate to empower such level of relief with staff. Several members of the P&ZlLPA Board felt that the Board of Adjustment was sufficiently up to the task of addressing any requested variance from the County's Land Development Code to meet the same goals as cited on this Ordinance or, that an elected body, such as the Board of County Commissioners, was the more appropriate body to hear any requested variances from these codes. No action is required from the County Commission at this time. This is the first of two required public hearings on this matter. The second public hearing on this matter will be held on Tuesday January 20, 2004, at 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. [X] APPROVED c=J OTHER D DENIED Approved 5-0 to continue to January 20,2004 ENCE: COMMISSION ACTION: g as M. Anderson ounty Administrator k Coordination/ Signatures , Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: (agend760a) '-' ....,,¡ COMMISSION REVIEW: January 6,2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (Administration) MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Community Development Director DATE: December 31,2003 SUBJECT: Consider Draft Ordinance 04-001, Amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code By Creating Section 10.01.10, Administrative Variances To Any Required Dimensional Requirement of this Code to Accomplish the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan and this Code Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 04-001 which would propose to create a new section in our Land Development Code whereby additional authority to grant administrative variances would be given to the Community Development Director when owing to special conditions, the literal enforcement of the dimensional provisions of this Code would impose a condition whereby greater harm to the existing natural environment would be caused than might otherwise be achieved through the granting of limited relief from any such minimum dimensional standard, subject to the standards and procedures set forth in this section. In short, these amendments allow the County to grant relief from our various setbacks when it can be demonstrated that doing so would provide for less environmental damage than if the rule in question were strictly applied. It is the belief of the County that by creating a process where flexibility can be applied, we will wind up with better projects and impacts on the natural system will be minimized. It needs to be noted that in establishing this process, the Community Development Director is required to receive comment and recommendations from the following other Departments before any final decision is rendered; Public Works Director, County Engineer, Building Official, Fire Marshal, Environmental Resource Manager and any other appropriateHCounty or State official relevant to the review of the application at hand. The maximum administrative variance that may be granted is 50% of the minimum requirements. Anything requested that is greater than this must be reviewed by either the Board of Adjustment or the Board of County Commissioners, as may otherwise be required. On December 16, 2003, the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency for St. Lucie County held a public hearing on this matter. At the conclusion of that hearing, the Board voted to recommend that the County Commission not approve Draft Ordinance 04-001 as drafted. The concerns cited by the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency were that they did not feel it was appropriate to empower such level of relief with staff. Several members of the P&ZlLPA Board felt that the Board of Adjustment was sufficiently up to the task of addressing any requested variance from the County's Land Development Code to meet the same goals as cited on this Ordinance or, that an elected body, '-' ...", December 31 , 2003 Page 2 Subject: Draft Ordinance 04-001, Amending t he St. Lucie County Land Development Code By Creating Section 10.01.10, Administrative Variances To Any Required Dimensional Requirement of this Code to Accomplish the Goals, Objectives and Policies of the Comprehensive Plan and this Code such as the Board of County Commissioners, was the more appropriate body to hear any requested variances from these codes. No action is required from the County Commission at this time. This is the first of two required public hearings on this matter. The second public hearing on this matter will be held on Tuesday January 20, 2004, at 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. If you have any questions, please let us know. DJMI OR_04-001_MEM02(h) cc: County Administrator County Attorney Planning Manager '-" "'WIll ORDINANCE NO. 04-001 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY CREATING SECTION 10.01.10, ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCES TO ANY REQUIRED DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENT OF THIS CODE TO ACCOMPLISH THE GOALS, OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AND THIS CODE; PROVIDING CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determination: 1. On August I, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, adopted the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 2. The Board of County Commissioners has adopted certain amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, through the following Ordinances 91-003 - March 14, 1991 91-009 - May 14, 1991 91-021 - November 7, 1991 92-017 - June 2, 1992 93-001 - February 16, 1993 93-003 - February 16, 1993 93-005 - May 25, 1993 93-006 - May 25, 1993 93-007 - May 25, 1993 94-007 - June 22, 1994 94-018 - August 16, 1994 94-021 - August 16, 1994 95-001 - January 10, 1995 96-010 - August 6, 1996 97-001 - March 4, 1997 97-009 - October 7,1997 97-003 - September 2, 1997 99-001 - February 2, 1999 99-002 - April 6, 1999 99-03 - August 17, 1999 99-004 - August 17, 1999 99-005 - July 20, 1999 -------------------------------- Underline is for addition Stril<e TRFeIfR is for deletion Ordinance #04.()()1a Draft #1 Page 1 PRINT DATE: 12/05103 '-' ...", 99-015 - July 20, 1999 99-016 - July 02, 1999 99-017 - September 7,1999 99-018 - November 2, 1999 00-010 - June 13,2000 00-011 - June 13, 2000 00-012 - June 13, 2000 00-013 - June 13, 2000 01-003 - December 18, 2001 02-005 - June 24, 2002 02-009 - March 5, 2002 02-020 - October 15, 2002 02-029 - October 15, 2002 03-005 - October 7, 2003 3. On December 18, 2003, the Local Planning Agency/ Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on the proposed ordinance after publishing notice in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune at least 10 days prior to the hearing and recommended that the proposed ordinance be approved. 4. On January 6, 2004, this Board held its first public hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune on December 26, 2003. 5. On January20, 2004, this Board held its second public hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune on January 9,2004. 6. The proposed amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code are consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and are in the best interest of the health safety and public welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. THE SPECIFIC AMENDMENTS TO THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO READ AS FOLLOWS, INCLUDE: --------------------------------- Underline is for addition StFike Tt'lFelgt'l is for deletion Ordinance #04-001 a Draft #1 Page 2 PRINT DATE: 12/05103 '-' ....., ---------**----------------- CHAPTER X 10.00.00 HARDSHIP RELIEF 10.01.10 ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCES TO ANY REQUIRED DIMENSIONAL REQUIREMENT OF THIS CODE A. GENERAL 1 PURPOSE The purpose of this section is to provide a mechanism when. owinQ to special conditions. the literal enforcement of the dimensional provisions of this Code would impose a condition whereby Qreater harm to the existinQ natural environment would be caused than might otherwise be achieved throuQh the QrantinQ of limited relief from any such minimum dimensional standard. subiect to the standards and procedures set forth in this section 2. AUTHORITY Except as provided for in Section 10.00.00. the Community Development Director may grant administrative variances from the dimensional reouirements of this Code. in accordance with the standards and procedures set forth in this section. where any such administrative variance is determined through specific findinQs of fact to be necessary to accomplish the identified Goals. Obiectives and Policies of the County's Comprehensive Plan and this Code. 3. INITIATION A written petition for a administrative variance is to be initiated by the owner of. or any person havinQ contractual interest in. the property for which relief is SOUQht. -------------------------------- Underline is for addition StFike Tluell!jl:l is for deletion Ordinance #04-001 a Draft #1 Page 3 PRINT DATE: 12/05103 '-' ..., B. LIMITATIONS ON THE GRANTING OF ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCES 1 Administrative variances shall not be Qranted that would: fh... Grant relief in excess of 50.01% of the minimum cited dimensional standard. 12.:.. Permit the use of land or a structure contrary to the use provisions of Section 3.01.00; f:... Permit a variance from the provisions of Section 4.01.00 that would authorize any building to have a heiQht in excess of one hundred and twenty (120%) percent of the maximum permitted by the particular zone in which it is located or to be in excess of one hundred and twenty five (125) feet. whichever is less. 2. No administrative variance from the any dimensional reQuirement of this code, other than those administrative variances Qranted for or in con junction with a Final Development Order as described under Section 11.02.00. shall be valid for a period lonQer than twelve (12) months unless a buildinQ permit is issued. An administrative variance issued for. or in. con junction with a Final Development Order as described under Section 11.02.00 shall expire upon the termination of that Final Development Order unless the Final Development Order is extended or otherwise determined to be compliant with the provisions of this Code. C. STANDARDS FOR GRANTING ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCES The Community Development Director shall not Qrant an administrative variance unless. in each case. he makes sp~cific findinQs of fact based directly upon the particular evidence presented. supported throuQh written conclusions that: L The variance reQuested arises from a condition that is uniQue and peculiar to the land. structures and buildinQs involved; that the particular physical surroundinQs. the shape. or topoQraphical condition of the specific property involved. would result in Qreater harm to the existinQ natural environment. if -------------------------------- Underline is for addition Strike TI'lreygl:1 is for deletion Ordinance #04-001 a Draft #1 Page 4 PRINT DATE: 12/05103 \w' ..."" the provisions of this Code are literally enforced; that it is a condition that is not ordinarily found in the same zonina district. and the condition is created by the reaulations of this Code; 2. The arantina of the variance will not impair or in jure other property or improvements in the neiahborhood in which the sub iect property is located. nor impair an adeQuate supply of liaht or air to adjacent property. substantially increase the conaestion in the public streets. increase the danaer of fire. floodina. create a hazard to air naviaation. endanaer the public safety. or substantially diminish or impair property values within the neighborhood; -ª..... The variance aranted is the minimum reasonable variance that will make possible the reasonable use of the land. building or structures; and ~ The variance desired will not be opposed to the aeneral spirit and intent of this Code or the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. ~ PROCEDURES FOR APPLICATION 1 APPLICA TION An application for an administrative variance shall be filed with the Community Development Director. accompanied by a non-refundable fee. as established from time to time by the Board of County Commissioners to defray the actual cost of processinQ the application. The application shall be in such form and shall contain such information and documentation as shall be prescribed from time to time by the Director and shall contain at least the followina: a. Name and address of applicant; ~ Leaal description. street address. and lot number and subdivision name. if any. of the property which is the sub ject of the application; c. The size of the sub ject property; -------------------------------- Underline is for addition Strike Tluell!R is for deletion Ordinance #04-001 a Draft #1 Page 5 PRINT DATE: 12/05103 ~ "-' fL The variance souaht and the Section of this Code from which a variance is requested; ~ The purpose for the requested variance and a statement of the intended development of property if the variance is aranted; L A statement of the potential harm to the natural environment that would occur by a literal application of this Code; a statement settina forth reasons why this condition is unique to the applicant. a statement of why the variance will not be materially detrimental or iniurious to other property or improvements in the neiahborhood in which the sub iect property is located; a statement of why the variance will not increase traffic. the danaer of fire. or impair property values in the neiahborhood; a statement of why the proposed variance is the minimum variance that will make possible a reasonable use of the land. buildina. and structures; and a statement explainina how the proposed variance is consistent with the aeneral spirit and intent of this Code and the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 9.:. If the variance is souaht to erect or increase the heiaht of any structure. to permit the arowth of any tree. or to use property in the Airport Zones established in Section 4.00.00.the application shall be accompanied by a written determination from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA Form 7460) as to the effect of the proposal on the operation of air naviaation facilities and the safe. efficient use of naviaable airspace. b. FILING AN APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCE Within twenty (20) days after an application for approval of a variance is submitted. the Community Development Director shall determine whether the application is complete. If the Director determines that the application is not complete. he shall send a written statement specifyina the application I s deficiencies to the applicant by mail. The Director shall take no further action on the application unless the deficiencies are remedied. 3. REVIEW OF THE APPLICATION -------------------------------- Underline is for addition Strike TRF9I1g1:1 is for deletion Ordinance #04-001 a Draft '1 Page 6 PRINT DATE: 12105/03 '-' 'wtI S!:. Review by the Community Development Director L When the Community Development Director determines an application for approval of a variance is complete. he shall submit a copy of the reQuested administrative variance to the Public Works Director. County EnQineer. BuildinQ Official. Fire Marshal. Environmental Resource ManaQer and any other appropriate County or State official for review, comment and recommendation. ~ Within twenty (20) workinQ days after transmittal of the application for administrative variance. the Public Works Director. County EnQineer. BuildinQ Official. Fire Marshal. Environmental Resource Manaaer and any other appropriate County or State official shall submit to the community development director written recommendations on the reQuested administrative variance. iii. Within ten (10) workinQ days after the due date for the outside department reviews of the reQuested administrative variance. the Community Development Director shall issue a decision approvinQ. approvinQ with conditions. or denyinQ throuQh resolution/ administrative order. the reQuested administrative variance. ~ The Community Development Director may place reasonable conditions. limitations. and reQuirements upon the QrantinQ of any administrative variance as may be necessary to ensure compliance with the intent of this Code. Such conditions. limitations. or reQuirements may be placed on the 9rantinQ of any variance to prevent or minimize adverse effects upon other property in the neiQhborhood which miQht otherwise result from the reductions in standards beinQ reQuested, includinQ but not limited to conditions. limitations. or reQuirements on the size. intensity of use. bulk. and location of any structure; landscapinQ; liQhtinQ; the provision of adeQuate inQress and eQress, and the duration of the variance. Such conditions. limitations. or reQuirements shall be set forth expressly in the resolution QrantinQ the variance. -------------------------------- Underline is for addition Str:ike TI1F9YliR is for deletion Ordinance N04..()()1 a Draft #1 Page 7 PRINT DATE: 12/05103 '-' ....., f:... Any variance from the provisions of Section 4.00.00. Airport Overlay Zone, will be so conditioned as to reQuire the owner of the structure or tree in Question to install. operate. and maintain. at the owner's expense. such markinQs and lights as reQuired by Section 333.07(3). Florida Statutes. in accordance with the standards published in Chapter 14-60. FAC. Rules of the Department of Transportation. If deemed proper by the Community Development Director. this condition may be modified to reQuire the owner to permit St. Lucie County at its own expense. to install. operate. and maintain the necessary markinQs and liQhts. fl The decision of the Community Development Director shall be mailed to the petitioner and filed with the Office of the Community Development Director in accordance with Section 1l.00.04(F). ~ EXTENSIONS OF VARIANCE APPROVALS The time limitations imposed on any Variance by Section 10.00.00(-) may be extended by the Community Development Director not more than one (1) time. and for not more than twelve (12) months, upon application by the applicant. L APPEALS FROM THE DECISION OF THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR Any final action by the Community Development Director in accordance with this Section may. within thirty (30) days after the rendition of such decision. be appealed to the Board of Ad iustment in accordance with the provisions of Section 11.00.00(-)(-). *********************** PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. -------------------------------- Underline is for addition StFike TIIr~I~!lR is for deletion Ordinance #04-001 a Draft #1 Page 8 PRINT DATE: 12/05103 '-'" ...., Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY . If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall beheld to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable in the unincorporated area of St. Lucie County. PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk be and is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART F. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. PART G. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Paula Lewis xxx Vice Chairman John D. Bruhn xxx Chai rman Doug Coward xxx -------------------------------- Underline is for addition Strike Threll¡¡t:! is for deletion Ordinance #04-oo1a Draft #1 Page 9 PRINT DATE: 12/05103 ~ ...., Commissioner Cliff Barnes xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx PART H. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that parts B through H shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ENACTED this day of ,2004. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: -------------------------------- Undertine is for addition StFike TI'IF9I1g.:¡ is for deletion Ordinance #04-001 a Draft #1 Page 10 PRINT DATE: 12/05103 '-' BY: ~ County Attorney Underline is for addition StF'ilt8 ThF'llI:!gh is for deletion , '-' ...,,¡ be Agenda Request Item Number: Meetina Date: Jan. 6,2004 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ X] [ [ ] [ X ] Quasi-JD [ _ r-" To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development -'--' irector SUBJECT: .-,- Consider Draft Ordinance 04-002, amending the St. Lucie County Land Devel pment Code by amending section 7.10.13 Sewage and Septage Treatment Facilities in Agricultural Zoning Districts to provide for municipal annexation of a facility site. BACKGROUND: Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 04-002, which proposes to amend the County's current regulations that address Sewage and Septage Treatment facilities in agricultural zoning districts. In sum, these regulations do not prevent a municipal authority from annexation land and proceeding with the development of a sewage or septage treatment facility on that land where the land will retain the County's agricultural zoning designation, until the zoning and land use have been changed in accord with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, by the annexing municipality. These regulations simply require that the County be included as a consenting partner in the application of the conditional use permit. The reasoning behind this recommend change is that in order to avoid unnecessary multi-jurisdictional conflicts that can rise out of inadequate communication between two separate political entities, where one side can be played off against the other, consensus agreement to the appropriateness of the location and addressing of any site development impacts would be required. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A On December 16, 2003, the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency for St. Lucie County held a public hearing on this matter. At the conclusion of that hearing, the Board voted to recommend that the County Commission not approve Draft Ordinance 04-001 as drafted. The concems cited by the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission! Local Planning Agency were that they did not feel that amendment was necessary to address the concems raised by the recent City of Port St. Lucie actions towards the development of a regional wastewater treatment facility. Further, it was the opinion of some members of the P&ZlLPA, that County's should not be engaged in the provision of services such as water and sewer services that traditionally, at least in Florida, have been provided by municipalities. RECOMMENDATION: No action is required from the County Commission at this time. This is the first of two required public hearings on this matter. The second public hearing on this matter will be held on Tuesday January 20, 2004, at 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. LXI APPROVED c=J OTHER D DENIED Approved 5-0 to continue to January 20,2004 URRENCE: COMMISSION ACTION: - D uglas M. Anderson ounty Administrator ;~ Coordination/ Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: (agend761a) '-' ...., COMMISSION REVIEW: January 6, 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (Administration) MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Community Development Director DATE: SUBJECT: December 31, 2003 Consider Draft Ordinance 04-002, amending the St. Lucie County Land Development Code by amending section 7.10.13 Sewage and Septage Treatment Facilities in Agricultural Zoning Districts to provide for municipal annexation of a facility site. Attached is a copy of Draft Ordinance 04-002, which proposes to amend the County's current regulations that address Sewage and Septage Treatment facilities in agricultural zoning districts. In sum, these regulations do not prevent a municipal authority from annexation land and proceeding with the development of a sewage or septage treatment facility on that land where the land will retain the County's agricultural zoning designation, until the zoning and land use have been changed in accord with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, by the annexing municipality. These regulations simply require that the County be included as a consenting partner in the application of the conditional use permit. The reasoning behind this recommend change is that in order to avoid unnecessary multi- jurisdictional conflicts that can rise out of inadequate communication between two separate political entities, where one side can be played off against the other, consensus agreement to the appropriateness of the location and addressing of any site development impacts would be required. On December 16, 2003, the Planning and Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency for St. Lucie County held a public hearing on this matter. At the conclusion of that hearing, the Board voted to recommend that the County Commission not approve Draft Ordinance 04-001 as drafted. The concerns cited by the members of the Planning and Zoning Commission/ Local Planning Agency were that they did not feel that amendment was necessary to address the concerns raised by the recent City of Port St. Lucie actions towards the development of a regional wastewater treatment facility. Further, it was the opinion of some members of the P&z/LPA, that County's should not be engaged in the provision of services such as water and sewer services that traditionally, at least in Florida, have been provided by municipalities. No action is required from the County Commission at this time. This is the first of two required public hearings on this matter. The second public hearing on this matter will be held on Tuesday January 20, 2004, at 6:00 PM or as soon thereafter as possible. If you have any questions, please let us know. DJM/ OR_04-002_MEM02(h) cc: County Attorney Planning Manager '-' ,.." ORDINANCE NO. 04-002 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE BY AMENDING SECTION 7.10 .13 SEWAGE AND SEPT AGE TREATMENT FACILITIES IN AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICTS TO PROVIDE FOR MUNICIPAL ANNEXATION OF A FACILITY SITE; PROVIDING CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION AND PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determination: 1. On August 1, 1990, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, adopted the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 2. The Board of County Commissioners has adopted certain amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, through the following Ordinances 91-03 - March 14, 1991 91-09 - May 14, 1991 91-21 - November 7, 1991 92-17 - June 2, 1992 93-01 - February 16, 1993 93-03 - February 16, 1993 93-05 - May 25, 1993 93-06 - May 25, 1993 93-07 - May 25, 1993 94-07 - June 22, 1994 94-18 - August 16, 19* 94-21 - August 16, 1994 95-01 - January 10, 1995 96-10 - August 6,1996 97-01 - March 4,1997 97-09 - October 7,1997 97-03 - September 2, 1997 99-01 - February 2, 1999 99-02 - April 6, 1999 99-03 - August 17, 1999 99-04 - August 17, 1999 99-05 - July 20, 1999 -------------------------------- Underline is for addition (;)trill!! ThrotJ~h is for deletion Ordinance #04-oo2a Dralt#1 Page 1 PRINT DATE: 12/05103 '-" 99-15 - 99-17 - oo-tO - 00-12 - 01-03 - 02-09 - 02-029 - 04-001 - July 20, 1999 September 7,1999 June 13, 2000 June 13, 2000 December 18, 2001 March 5, 2002 October 15, 2002 XXXXX xx, 2004 99-16 - 99-18 - 00-11 - 00-13 - 02-05 - 02-20 - 03-005 - ...", July 02,1999 November 2, 1999 June 13,2000 June 13, 2000 June 24, 2002 October 15, 2002 October 7, 2003 3. On December 18, 2003, the Local Planning Agency/ Planning and Zoning Commission held a public hearing on th~proposed ordinance after publishing notice in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune at least 10 days prior to the hearing and recommended that the proposed ordinance be approved. 4. On January 6, 2004, this Board held its first public hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune on December 26, 2003. 5. On January20, 2004, this Board held its second public hearing on the proposed ordinance, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune on January 9, 2004. 6. The proposed amendments to the St. Lucie County Land Development Code are consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives and standards of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and are in the best interest of the health safety and public welfare of the citizens of St. Lucie County, Florida. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board O-fCountyCommissionersof St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. Ordinance #04-oo2a Draft #1 -------------------------------- Underline is for addition Otrille Thrðtl~h is for deletion Page 2 PRINT DATE: 12/05/03 \w ....,¡ THE SPECIFIC AMENDMENTS TO THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY LAND DEVELOPMENT CODE TO READ AS FOLLOWS, INCLUDE: **************************** CHAPTER VII 7.00.00 DEVELOPMENT DESIGN AND IMPROVEMENT STANDARDS 7.10.13 SEWAGE AND SEPT AGE TREATMENT FACILITIES IN AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICTS In the AG-l, AG-2.5 and AG-5 zoning districts, the establishment of a sewage and septage treatment facility may be authorized as a conditional use, subject to the following criteria: A. A minimum of ten (10) acres shall be required for all treatment facility sites. B. No structure, treatment storage area or treatment facility shall be located within fifty (50) feet of any property line or required base building line. C. All areas of development shall be fenced or walled. A minimum twenty (20) foot wide landscape barrier shall be provided around the perimeter of the treatment facility. This buffer shall contain at least one tree for every thirty (30) linear feet around the perimeter. Trees, shrubs and hedges must comply with the requirements of Section 7.09.00. D. All entry-and exit points must be gate controlled. All gates must be constructed with an opaque material. Except for business operation hours, all gates are to be kept closed and locked. E. A site plan of this facility must accompany the application for conditional use. -------------------------------- Underline is for addition Gtril(8 ThrôtJgh is for deletion Ordinance #04-002a Draft #1 Page 3 PRINT DATE: 12/05/03 '-' ....,¡ F. In the event of municipal annexation of a site pursuant to Chapter 171. Florida Statutes. an application for a facility shall require review and approval by the County until the applicable provisions of the municipal comprehensive plan and land development regulations for the annexed site have been approved by the municipality and determined to be in compliance pursuant to Part II. Chapter 163. Florida Statutes. **************************** PART B. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY . If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall beheld to be inapplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicable in the unincorporated area of St. Lucie County. PART E. FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk be and is hereby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Administrative Code and Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida 32304. PART F. EFFECTIVE DATE. This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. -------------------------------- Underline is for addition Ðtril(ð Thrðtll:l" is for deletion Ordinance #04-oo2a Draft #1 Page 4 PRINT DATE: 12/05103 '-' ...." PART G. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Paula Lewis xxx Vice Chairman John D. Bruhn xxx Chairman Doug Coward xxx Commissioner Cliff Barnes xxx Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx PART H. CODIFICATION. Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the St. Lucie County Code and Compiled Laws, and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that parts B through H shall not be codified. PASSED AND DULY ENACTED this day of ,2004. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman -------------------------------- Underline is for addition Otrilt13 TI'Il'OtI~'" is for deletion Ordinance #04-oo2a Draft #1 Page 5 PRINT DATE: 12/05/03 Ordinance 1I04-000a Draft 111 ~ APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: ....., County Attorney -------------------------------- Underline is for addition StrUts 'Fhl'ðtl§i'I is for deletion Page 6 PRINT DATE: 12/05/03 \ ~ 'IfIÎ Agenda Request Item Number: MeetinQ Date: r;F Jan 6, 2004 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ X ] [ [ ] [X ] Quasi-JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development BACKGROUND: Consider draft of the Stipulated Settlement Agreemenf between St. Lucie ounty and the Florida Department of Community Affairs in regard to the outstanding I sues of non- compliance with the adopted St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan Amendments (refer to DOAH Case No. 02-2535GM; Docket Number 02-1 ER-N01-5601-(A)-(N». Attached is a copy of the final draft of the Stipulated Settlement Agreement between St. Lucie County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs in regard to the outstanding issues of non-compliance with the adopted St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan Amendments (refer to DOAH Case No. 02-2535GM; Docket Number 02-1 ER-N01-5601-(A)-(N). On March 5, 2002, this Board approved Ordinance 02-008 making several amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan. In June of 2002, the Department of Community Affairs made a finding that the adopted amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan were "Not in Compliance" with the requirements of Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-6, Florida Administrative Code. Over the next several months DCA and County staff worked on developing a series of remedial amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan that address the issues cited in the DCA's notice of non-compliance. In late Summer 2003, County and DCA staff completed negotiations on this matter. The results of these negotiations are found in the attached documents. These are the same draft amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan that staff had provided to the Board for review over the summer. SUBJECT: On December 9, 2003, the St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency held a public meeting to review the proposed Stipulated Settlement Agreement. At the conclusion of that meeting, and by unanimous agreement of the members present, the LPA recommended that the Board approve the stipulated settlement agreement, subject to several minor points of clarification. Those points include amending Policy &.1.4.14 to provide for some form of mitigation relief if the wetland altered had little functional value; clarification to Policy 8.1.6.3 to include both the North and South Savannas as an area where off-road vehicles would be prohibited; and clarification to Policy 8.1.14.1 to provide for some relief for smaller parcel that may be impacted by inclusion as one of the cited wetland types. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: N/A N/A Staff recommends that the Board approve the Stipulated Settlement Agreement between St. Lucie County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs in regard to the outstanding issues of non-compliance with the adopted St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and further that the Board approve Draft Ordinance 04-004 which would approve the remedial amendments to the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. [X] APPROVED c=J OTHER D DENIED Approved 5-0 RENCE: COMMISSION ACTION: uglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: :JY' Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: (agend762a) '" ~ r COMMISSION REVIEW: January 6, 2004 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Community Development Director DATE: December 31,2003 SUBJECT: Consider draft of the Stipulated Settlement Agreement between St. Lucie County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs in regard to the outstanding issues of non-compliance with the adopted St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan Amendments (refer to DOAH Case No. 02-2535GM; Docket Number 02- 1 ER-N01-5601-{A)-{N). On January 6, 2004, you will be asked to review, the final draft of the Stipulated Settlement Agreement between St. Lucie County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs in regard to the outstanding issues of non-compliance with the adopted St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan Amendments (refer to DOAH Case No. 02-2535GM; Docket Number 02- 1 ER-N01-5601-{A)-{N). As the Board is aware, on March 5, 2002, this Board approved Ordinance 02-008 making several amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan. In June of 2002, the Department of Community Affairs made a finding that the adopted amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan were "Not in Compliance" with the requirements of Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes and Rule 9J-6, Florida Administrative Code. Over the next several months DCA and County staff worked on developing a series of remedial amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan that address the issues cited in the DCA's notice of non-compliance. In late Summer 2003, County and DCA staff completed negotiations on this matter. The results of these negotiations are found in the attached documents. These are the same draft amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan that staff had provided to the Board for review over the summer. As part of the Stipulated Settlement Agreement process, we will be including the revised amendments to the County's Comprehensive Plan for final adoption action. On December 9, 2003, the St. Lucie County Local Planning Agency held a public meeting to review the proposed Stipulated Settlement Agreement. At the conclusion of that meeting, and by unanimous agreement of the members present, the LPA recommended that the Board approve the Stipulated Settlement Agreement, subject to several minor points of clarification. Those points include amending Policy 8.1.4.14 to provide for some from of mitigation relief if the wetland altered had little functional value; clarification to Policy 8.1.6.3 to include both the North and South Savannas as an area where off-road vehicles would be prohibited; and clarification to Policy 8.1.14.1 to provide for some relief for smaller parcels that may be impacted by inclusion as one of the cited wetland types. '-' """" December 31 2003 Page 2 Subject: Stipulated Settlement Agreement - St. Lucie County DCA DOAH Case No. 02-2535GM; Docket Number 02-1 ER-N01-5601-(A)-(N). Staff recommends that the Board approve the Stipulated Settlement Agreement between St. Lucie County and the Florida Department of Community Affairs in regard to the outstanding issues of non-compliance with the adopted St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan and further that the Board approve Draft Ordinance 04-004 which would approve the remedial amendments to the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. If you have any questions, please let me know. SUBMITTED: nt Director DJM SLC_COMPLAN_AGREEMENT2(H) cc: County Administrator County Attorney 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 '-' ..." ORDINANCE NO. 04-004 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN TO INCORPORATE THE REMEDIAL AMENDMENTS TO THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS IDENTIFIED IN THE STIPULATED SETTLEMEN"t"'ASAEEMENT BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY AND THE Ft.OIUDA DEPA ENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS IN REGARD TO THE OUTSTAND UES OF NON-COMPLIANCE WITH THE ADOPTED ST:· LU COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENTS (~EF~~iTO DOAH C . ....."'0. 02-2535GM; DOCKET NUMBER 02-1E~TNOl-5601-(A)-(N»; PROVIDING CONFLICTING PROVISIONS; PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY; PROVIDING FOR APPLICABILITY;iPROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT. OF STATE; PR9V1;~ING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR ADOPTION ANDP~OVIDING FOR CODIFICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County CornmissionerS of St. LuCie County, Florida, has made the following determination: 1. On January 9,1990, the BoardofCoÜnty Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, adopt¢dthe St. Luci¢ÇoUnty Comprehensive Plan. 2. 'T"h¢B()~rd of Cô~ntyCommissioners has adopted certain amendments to the St. LLJcieÇqunty Compr~h~n$ive Plan, through the following Ordinances 90-028 92-018 92-028 92-029 92-031 94-015 95-029 95-036 96-017 96-018 Map/ Small Area Map/ Small Area Map/ Small Area Map/ Large Area Map/ Small Area Map/ Large Area Text Amendment Text Amendment Map/ Small Area Map/ Small Area May 22, 1990 March 24, 1992 September 22, 1992 September 22, 1992 November 10, 1992 May 3, 1994 June 20, 1995 August 15, 1995 May 7, 1996 May 21, 1996 -------------------------------- Underline is for oddition ¡t';¡¡;;;:¡;;:¡;'Jk is for deletion Ordinance #04-0044 Final Droft Page 1 PRINT DATE:12/31/03 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 '-' ~ 02-008 03-027 General Amendments March 5. 2002 Map/ Large Scale December 16, 2003 3. On March 5, 2002, this Board adopted Ordinance 02-008, amending the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. 4. On or about June 5, 2002 the Florida Departme"t of Comm statement of intent to find the adopted ame~qmentsifq Comprehensive Plan. "not in compliance" with thêminimumr~q 163, Florida statutes. 5. On or about October 15, 2003 the Florida Dep~rfÌ'ri~it~of Community airs and St. Lucie County agreed to the form of a Stipulated~~ttl~~~~t Agreement and remedial amendments to the St. Lucie County Compr~hensiv~~'~~t~?t addressed the items cited in Florida Department of Community Affairs stat~~~~lgt"Not in Compliance" with the minimum requirements of Chapter.l~3, FloridaStÇ1tLl'tes 6. On January 6, 2004 this Boardheld a .PHþlieh~(1r.i"g..~nthe proposed Stipulated Settlement Agreement andremedialiåmend~~~tsito the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, after publishing a notice of such hearing in the Port St. Lucie News and the Tribune on December 26, 2003. NOW, THEREFORE, aE County, flôrlqa: AINEbbyfbèBoard of County Commissioners of St. Lucie PART A. 'TH~SPF~FIC.~~I:)IAL AMENDMENTS ATTACHED AS EXHIBIT A TO.,.Hei~OALS,OBJECTIVES AND POLICIES OF THE ST. LUCIE COUN1"Y~C?~~B~HENSIVE PLAN ARE ADOPTED AND INCORPORATED INTO THE. ST. LUCIE COUNTY COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AS FOLLOWS: See attached ExhibitA PART B. FINbINGS OF CONSISTENCY. The BoåÎ"dspecifically determines that the specific remedial amendments to the Goals, -------------------------------- Underline is for addition 't~!k is for d~letion Ordinance #04-0040 final Draft Page 2 PRINT DATE:I2131/03 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 '-' ...." Objectives and Policies of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan described in Part A are internally consistent with the other Goals, Objectives and Policies found in the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. PART C. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS. Special acts of the Florida legislature adopted prior toth~.1968~,~ri~~Constitution that are applicable only to unincorporated areas of St. Ltjcie CountYi>T9~~1)'~rdinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinanceareºer~by~upers~ged by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART D. SEVERABILITY . If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or edJo be unconstitutional, inoperative, or void, such holding shall not affect the remain . ......q,.f.iqns of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof.~~~llþ~h~ld to be in(Jpplicable to any person, property, or circumstance, such holding sh(J1I not aff~c~i~$.(Jpplic"bility to any other person, property, or circumstance. PART E. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE. This ordinance shall be applicctble in the urliocorpprøfed area of St. Lucie County. PART F. FtLING wtrH··THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE. The Clerk bedn the Bureau of A Florida 32304. hereby drrect~?føçthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to inis!rgtive Code god Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, PARTG. FILING H>THE DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNITY AFFAIRS. Th~Clerk be and is hE;reby directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to fh¢Department of. (;ømmunity Affairs, 2555 Shummard Oaks Boulevard, Tallahassee, Florida 32399. -------------------------------- Underline is for addition ¡t~Jk is for deletion Ordinance #04-0040 Final Draft Page 3 PRINT DATE:12/31/03 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ~ PART H. EFFECTIVE DATE. .-..,.1 This ordinance shall take effect upon the issuance by the State Land Planning Agency of a Notice of Intent to find the adopted remedial amendments "in compliance" accordance with Section 163.3184(9) Florida Statutes. PART I. ADOPTION. After motion and second, the vote on this Chairman Paula Lewis Vice Chairman John D. Bruhn Commissioner Doug Coward CommissionerCliff Commissioner Frannie PART H. CODIFICATION.. as ProvisiortS~~f·.... rdinances~~II~~jncorporated in the St. Lucie County Code and Compiled Laws, and the~ri..8~rdinance"ma~~~.changed to "section", "article", or other appropriate word, and the S~A[iºn~(~f this ordinan.ce may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention;provided,~(lw r, that parts B through H shall not be codified. PASSEb AND DULY E ED this 6th day of January, 2004. -------------------------------- Underline is for addition '1:~,k is for deletion Ordinance #04·0040 Final Draft Page 4 PRINT DATE:12/31/03 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ATTEST: ~ Deputy Clerk Ordinance #04-0040 Final Droft ..., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY I FLORIDA Chairman -------------------------------- Underline is for addition '*~Ik is for deletion Page 5 PRINT DATE:12/31/03 ~ ...; COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Community Development Director DATE: January 4,2004 SUBJECT: Planning and Zoning Commission Minutes - December 18, 2003 Attached are copies of the Planning and Zoning Commission minutes from December 18, 2003, in regard to two public hearings set for the Boards meeting of January 6, 2004. Due to the holidays, we had some timing troubles getting them out to you earlier. Please note that these hearings are the first of the two required public hearings on these items. The second public hearing on item is set for January 20, 2004. If you have any questions, please let me know. DJM P&ZMINUTES121803(H) '-' ...., St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning CommissionILocal Planning Agency Meeting Minutes REGULAR MEETING December 18, 2003 Commission Chambers, 3rd Floor, Roger Poitras Annex 7:00 P.M. MEMBERS PRESENT: Mr. McCurdy, Mr. Lounds, Mr. Trias, Ms. Hammer, Mr. Grande, Mr. Hearn, and Ms. Hensley. MEMBERS ABSENT: Mr. Akins and Chairman McCurdy. (Both Absent with Notice) OTHERS PRESENT: Mr. Dennis Murphy, Community Development Director; Ms. Cyndi Snay, Development Review Planner Ill; Ms. Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney; and Ms. Dawn Gilmore, Administrative Secretary. P & Z ILPA Meeting December 18, 2003 Page 1 '-" ..." CALL TO ORDER Chairman McCurdy called to order the meeting of the St. Lucie County Planning and Zoning CommissionILocal Planning Agency at 7:00 P.M. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE ROLL CALL ANNOUNCEMENTS I DISCLOSURES: Chairman McCurdy disclosed that his employer made a loan to the applicant for Agenda Item # 2 but was not going to recuse himself because it was not a conflict. Chairman McCurdy gave a brief presentation on the procedures and what to expect for tonight's meeting. The Planning and Zoning CommissionILocal Planning Agency is an agency that makes recommendations to the Board of County Commissioners on land use matters. These recommendations are made after consideration of staff recommendation and information gathered at a public hearing, such as those we will hold tonight. The meeting will progress in the following manner: · The Chair will call each item. · Staff will make a brief presentation on the facts of the request. · The petitioner will explain his or her request to the Board. · Members of the public will be allowed to present information regarding the request. · The public portion of the meeting will be closed and the Board will discuss the request. Further public comment will not be accepted unless the Board has specific questions. · The Board will vote on its recommendation after its discussion. For legal reasons, the motion may be chosen and read from a script provided by staff. Motions both for and against are provided to the Board members. · The recommendation is then forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners for their consideration and vote, usually within the next month. The Planning and Zoning CommissionILocal Planning Agency acts only in an advisory capacity for the Board of County Commissioners and actions taken are recommendations only. Interested parties will also have the opportunity to speak at a public hearing in front of the Board of County Commissioners who will ultimately have the final decision. No other announcements or discussion. P & Z ILPA Meeting December 18, 2003 Page 2 '-' AGENDA ITEM 1: MEETING MINUTES - NOVEMBER 20. 2003: Ms. Hammer made a motion to approve as written. Motion seconded by Mr. Grande. Upon a vote, the motion was approved unanimously with a vote of 7-0. P & Z ILPA Meeting December 18,2003 Page 3 '-' '-' ...., AGENDA ITEM 4: DRAFT ORDINANCE 04-001- ADMINISTRATIVE VARIANCES: Mr. Dennis Murphy stated that Agenda Item # 4 was to consider Draft Ordinance 04-001, which would propose to create a new section our Land Development Code whereby authority to grant administrative variances would be given to the Community Development Director when owing to special conditions, the literal enforcement of the dimensional provisions of the Land Development Code would impose a condition whereby greater harm to the existing natural environment would be caused than might otherwise be achieved through the granting of limited relief from any such minimum dimensional standard, subject to the standards and procedures set forth in this section. These amendments allow the County to grant relief from various setbacks when it can be demonstrated that doing so would provide for less environmental damage than if the rule in question were strictly applied. Mr. Murphy stated that it is the belief of the County that by creating a process where flexibility can be applied, we will wind up with better projects and impacts on the natural system will be minimized. It needs to be noted that in establishing this process, the Community Development Director is required to receive comment and recommendations from the following other departments before any final decision is rendered; Public Works Director, County Engineer, Building Official, Fire Marshal, Environmental Resource Manager, and any other appropriate County or State official relevant to the review of the application at hand. The maximum administrative variance that may be granted is 50% of the minimum requirements. Anything requested that is greater than this must be reviewed by either the Board of Adjustment or the Board of County Commissioners, as may otherwise be required. Staff recommends that you forward this matter to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Mr. Hearn questioned if there was an Environmental Review Board in St. Lucie County. Mr. Murphy stated that there was a Environmental Control Hearing Board that only reviews certain health related violations, not routine environmental resource issues. Mr. Lounds stated that he feels this ordinance removes some of the authority of the Board of Adjustment. He also questioned why if a developer is not negotiating are we trying to provide them with some relief. He stated that if the developer isn't interested in preservation, they should just pay the mitigation fees. Ms. Hammer questioned what would happen if the other departments reviewed the application and could not agree on the relief because of their objections. Mr. Murphy stated that the Community Development Director would have the final decision, but that decision would likely not be made in the positive to the applicant if other departments, particularly the resource related ones, objected. He continued that a safety mechanism could be added to the ordinance that allows it to be brought before the Board of County Commissioners or the Board of Adjustment for final review if there isn't a consensus. Mr. Lounds stated that he is concerned about who defines what the limited relief is. Ms. Hammer stated that she felt this ordinance would help to cut through some of the red tape, but that she feels there should be a safety valve of some sort, like having a super majority. Mr. P & Z ILPA Meeting December 18, 2003 Page 9 '-' ..."", Grande stated that he felt these decisions should be made by elected officials, not the Community Development Director. Mr. Trias stated he did not understand why there was concern because the Board of Adjustment currently makes these decisions, they are not elected officials, but the elected officials appoint them. Mr. Grande stated he felt it would be more appropriate to make it the elected officials' responsibility, not the Board of Adjustment. Chainnan McCurdy stated that he does not feel that the elected officials are the only ones capable of making informed decisions. He continued that he feels staff would be providing a means for common sense, but not sure 50% is a good number. Mr. Hearn stated that he is concemed about this because he is not comfortable with the Board of Adjustment having the final say. He continued that he felt it should all be brought before the Board of County Commissioners. He also stated that he felt there should be some relief mechanism, but an Environmental Review Board or a body like them should provide it. Mr. Trias stated that he did not feel the current standards were clear enough for variances to be granted. Chairman McCurdy opened the public hearing. Mr. Bob Bangert stated that he felt St. Lucie County should join the other twenty-one (21) counties in Florida that have an Environmental Resource Regulation Department that allows for more public involvement in environmental protection matters. He stated that this ordinance would erode the current levels of protection and reduce the public's involvement. Mr. Lounds questioned if Mr. Bangert was a member of the Board of Adjustment. Mr. Bangert confirmed that he was a member but that if anyone had a problem with their decision they could file an appeal. Ms. Heather Young explained that the Board of Adjustment's decision is final, but the applicant can file an appeal through the Circuit Court. Mr. Craig Munt stated that he felt this ordinance was an erosion of what is mandated in the Land Development Code and the Comprehensive Plan. He stated that he would not like to see this ordinance approved. Seeing no one else, Chairman McCurdy closed the public hearing. Mr. Grande stated that the purpose of the ordinance that was written on page 3 was valid, but the method of implementation was not in the best interest of the County. He continued that this ordinance takes away from the responsibilities of the Board of Adjustment, who are appointed by the representatives of the people, and instead gives it to the Community Development Director. Mr. Hearn stated that he felt the environments protection was very important and putting the review process behind closed doors was wrong, so he would not support this ordinance. Mr. Lounds stated that he agreed in the public hearing process, but at times there needs to be some flexibility for Staff to keep the process moving. Mr. Trias stated that the reason they have appointed officials make technical decisions because they are politically motivated. He stated that currently to get a variance the applicant needs to demonstrate a hardship, but this variance process could allow development without the actual P & Z ILPA Meeting December 18, 2003 Page 10 '-' ..."" hardship. He continued that the Community Development Director is not as political as the Board of County Commissioners, so in theory it is a good idea. However, he feels the implementation needs to be re-worded and re-presented to them. Ms. Hensley stated that she too is concerned and feels that it should be re-written and brought back to them for review at that time. Mr. Hearn stated that feels putting this kind of responsibility on one person, who is a County employee, is not taking it out of the political process. He also stated that taking the public hearing process out of it is wrong, so he could not support this ordinance as it is written. Mr. Lounds stated that he too is not comfortable with the language. Mr. Murphy stated that the standards of review listed in the ordinance are exactly as those that are found in the Board of Adjustments standards, just that the hardship requirement was removed because they are trying to preserve and protect the environment. Mr. Grande stated that he is concerned that no one from the public will know about any of these administrative variances, until after the fact. He questioned why the Board of County Commissioners would feel it is better to have the Community Development Director make this decision than the Board of Adjustment. He stated that he would not be able to support this ordinance. He also stated that he didn't feel this ordinance was necessary because Staff already has input when they make their recommendations to the Board of Adjustment. Mr. Trias made a motion to deny Draft Ordinance 04-001 because he feels that the Board of County Commissioners should have staff should work on this further, rewording it, and bringing it back to them for another review after the issues discussed have been addressed and then the Board of County Commissioners can make a final decision. Motion seconded by Mr. Grande. Upon a roll call vote the motion was unanimously approved (with a vote of 7-0) and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of denial as it is currently written. P & Z I LPA Meeting December 18, 2003 Page 11 '-' ...", AGENDA ITEM 5: DRAFT ORDINANCE 04-002 - SEW AGE AND SEPT AGE: Mr. Dennis Murphy stated that Agenda Item # 4 was to consider Draft Ordinance 04-002, which proposes to amend the County's current regulations that address Sewage and Septage Treatment facilities in agricultural zoning districts. In sum, these regulations do not prevent a municipal authority from annexation of land and proceeding with the development of a sewage or septage treatment facility on that land, where the land will retain the County's agricultural zoning designation, until the zoning and land use have been changed in accordance with Chapter 163, Florida Statutes, by the annexing municipality. These regulations simply require that that County be included as a consenting partner in the application of the conditional use permit. The reasoning behind this recommended change is that in order to avoid unnecessary multi- jurisdictional conflicts that can rise out of inadequate communication between two separate political entities, where one side can be played off against the other, consensus agreement to the appropriateness of the location and addressing any site development impacts would be required. Staff recommends that you forward Draft Ordinance 04-002 to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. Mr. Trias questioned how legal this ordinance was and stated he felt it was inappropriate. Mr. Hearn stated that he feels we need additional protection on processes that the municipalities go through when annexing properties. Mr. Lounds questioned if this ordinance was proposed to address any issues for future proposed water and sewer treatment plants. Mr. Murphy stated that he does believe so. Ms. Young stated that initially this ordinance would impact future annexed properties, not properties annexed in the past. She continued that it might be beneficial to add an effective date to the ordinance so that there is no confusion in the future. Mr. Grande stated that he believes that under section F, a property that has been annexed, but has not had it's comprehensive plan land use changed to the municipalities', would be affected by this ordinance. Ms. Young confirmed that was correct. She explained that any properties that had already gone through the entire process would not be affected by this ordinance, not ones that have not completed the process. Mr. Hearn questioned if this ordinance would give St. Lucie County more say in what happens to land that used to be in the County, but now has been incorporated into the city. Mr. Murphy stated that it would as it relates to the potential development of a sewage or septage treatment facility. Mr. Grande stated that would be only until such time that the city changed the land use. Mr. Murphy confirmed that was correct. Mr. Hearn questioned if the County would have any say in the land use change, other than through the public hearing process. Mr. Lounds stated the he hopes he doesn't make a decision today that he will regret ten years from now. He continued that he understands Port St. Lucie's need to get away from their residential area for a septic treatment plant. He stated that he is not sure about this ordinance and needs some more information. Mr. Trias stated that the County is trying to act as a city. He stated that the County in Broward and Miami-Dade Counties is demanding that all of the area that is being developed in an urban P & Z I LPA Meeting December 18, 2003 Page 12 '-' .." way be incorporated to the city. He continued that cities and counties should do different things and the problem now is that St. Lucie County is trying to do the same thing that a city should do, which he feels is dysfunctional and doesn't work in the long term. He stated that these decisions are going to end up being made for everyone because of the County's lawsuits and objections to perfectly reasonable and appropriate annexations in the cities. He stated that in the very near future the County would not be able to sustain the type of dysfunctional development that is going on. He continued that the sooner that realization happens the better off the community, citizens, and taxpayers are going to be. Mr. Lounds stated that he understood Mr. Trias' comments, but feels that the County is concerned about a municipality annexing so much property and not having the ability to service it. Mr. Trias' stated that is not what is going on in their municipality. Mr. Grande stated that he agrees with Mr. Trias' comments that municipal services should be provided by municipalities. He continued that he is not sure this ordinance is the best way to do this, but it is a problem that needs to be addressed. He stated that the County, who is not a municipality, is competing with municipalities as a municipal service provided, and probably shouldn't be. Mr. Trias stated that it is inappropriate for the County to be behaving as if it were a city. Chairman McCurdy opened the public hearing. Seeing no one, Chairman McCurdy closed the public hearing. Mr. Hearn stated that anyone living near one of these proposed properties would be concerned about the change of use anticipated. He continued that he would like to see a mechanism in place that would allow the County to have input on how land is going to be used that has been annexed, for the protection of the people who still live in the unincorporated area. Mr. Grande stated that he agreed and this ordinance is the staff s attempt to address that problem during the transition phase, after the annexation occurs and the new use is incorporated into the municipalities Comprehensive Plan. He stated the County's function is not to provide municipal services, but it is to protect the citizens that are not protected by the municipal governments. He also stated that it does give a measure of protection during that interim period, without infringing on the rights of the municipality. Mr. Trias stated that the cities already have public processes that would allow for that kind of input already. He questioned why the County has to be involved then. Mr. Grande stated that presupposes that the residents that live outside of the city, but are directly impacted as neighbors would have access to the system of public input in the decision making process. Mr. Trias stated that in his experience they do typically come to the public hearings and provide input. Mr. Grande stated that if they typically did there really wouldn't be a need for this ordinance. Mr. Grande made a motion to approve Draft Ordinance 04-002 as it is in the best interests of both the municipalities and the unincorporated county. Motion seconded by Mr. Lounds. Mr. Hearn stated that he would vote yes for the ordinance but would like to make it clear that he feels there needs to be stronger language to protect people that are being affected by the annexation process and the use of the land adjoining their property. P & Z / LPA Meeting December 18, 2003 Page 13 ~ .."" Upon a roll call vote the motion was approved with a vote of 5-1 (with Mr. Trias voting against) and forwarded to the Board of County Commissioners with a recommendation of approval. P & Z /LPA Meeting December 18, 2003 Page 14 ~ '-' 04- , Agenda Request Item Number: Meetina Date: Jan. 6, 2004 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [ x ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development ~. tor SUBJECT: Ft. Pierce Annexations K-256 and K-257 m Consider Initiating Conflict Resolutio proceedings pursuant to Chapter 164, Florida Statutes Attached are copies of recent advertisement announcing the intent of the City of Ft. Pierce to annex certain lands in the County into the City. The first of these hearings is set for January 5, 2004. The second, and final, hearing on these annexations will take place on Tuesday, January 20, 2004. BACKGROUND: As the Board is aware the City and the County are currently involved in litigation over the method of annexation that the City of Fort Pierce is utilizing in expanding their territorial limits. The fundamental issue in the County's complaint with the City is that they are not adhering to the annexation standards described in Chapter 171, Florida Statutes. The City's position, in sum, is that they do not have to adhere to these standards when the annexations are being done voluntarily through the execution of utility service agreements. As of this date, no hearing dates have been set for the Courts to review this complaint. In reviewing these proposed annexations, it is Staff's opinion that Annexation Ordinance K-257 is not consistent with the requirements of Chapter 171 Florida Statutes, and therefore should not be allowed to proceed until compliance with these requirements can be demonstrated. Specifically, the action in question is that, Annexation Ordinance K-257 serves to further the creation of a pocket of unincorporated area along the south market avenue corridor. The County is aware of no immediate plans of the City that would provide for the elimination of this "pocker. It is further the belief of the County, that if allowed to continue, the likelihood is high that the City will create another area of "enclave" through the annexation of other properties fronting along Oleander avenue to the south of the subject site. The creation of enclaves is expressly prohibited in Chapter 171, Florida Statutes, however that has in the past not prevented the City from annexing lands through the "voluntary annexation process" that have resulted in the establishment of enclaves of unincorporated areas of the County. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Annexation Ordinance K-256 is also a potentially objectionable annexation, not so much for the particular annexation itself, but for the fact that the "pocker that this annexation is serving to help fill-in was created improperly through the adjoining lands. N/A N/A Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to sign a resolution initiating the Conflict Resolution Process with the City of Ft. Pierce in regard to proposed Annexation Ordinance K-257 and further that staff be authorized to appear at the City Commission meeting of January 20, 2004 to express our concerns on this matter. Staff further request that authorization be given to formally request that the County be a full review and comment agency for any development proposal that may be filed on the properties associated with City of Ft. Pierce annexation Ordinance K-256. RRENCE: COMMISSION ACTION: [:xJ APPROVED D DENIED c=J OTHER Approved 4-1 (Comm. Hutchinson No) -- ouglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: ~ Coordination/ Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: (agend759a) ,. '-' ....., Commission Review: January 6,2004 Community Development Department Administration MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Community Development Director DATE: December 23, 2003 SUBJECT: Ft. Pierce Annexations K-256 and K-257 --- Consider Initiating Conflict Resolution proceedings pursuant to Chapter 164, Florida Statutes Attached are copies of recent advertisement announcing the intent of the City of Ft. Pierce to annex certain lands in the County into the City. The first of these hearings is set for January 5, 2004. The second, and final, hearing on these annexations will take place on Tuesday, January 20, 2004. As the Board is aware the City and the County are currently involved in litigation over the method of annexation that the City of Fort Pierce is utilizing in expanding their territorial limits. The fundamental issue in the County's complaint with the City is that they are not adhering to the annexation standards described in Chapter 171, Florida Statutes. The City's position, in sum, is that they do not have to adhere to these standards when the annexations are being done voluntarily through the execution of utility service agreements. As of this date, no hearing dates have been set for the Courts to review this complaint. In reviewing these proposed annexations, it is Staff's opinion that Annexation Ordinance K-257 is not consistent with the requirements of Chapter 171 Florida Statutes, and therefore should not be allowed to proceed until compliance with these requirements can be demonstrated. Specifically, the action in question is that, Annexation Ordinance K-257 serves to further the creation of a pocket of unincorporated area along the south market avenue corridor. The County is aware of no immediate plans of the City that would provide for the elimination of this "pockef'. It is further the belief of the County, that if allowed to continue, the likelihood is high that the City will create another area of "enclave" through the annexation of other properties fronting along Oleander avenue to the south of the subject site. The creation of enclaves is expressly prohibited in Chapter 171, Florida Statutes, however that has in the past not prevented the City from annexing lands through the ''voluntary annexation process" that have resulted in the establishment of enclaves of unincorporated areas of the County. Annexation K-256 is also a potentially objectionable annexation, not so much for the particular annexation itself, but for the fact that the "pocket" that this annexation is serving to help fill-in was created improperly through the adjoining lands. County staff is aware of that both of these parcels are currently subject to specific site plan! development reviews with the City. The County has not been formally provided copies of the specific development applications, however, a cursory review of the proposed development plan for annexation site K-257 that was done during a discussion with the property owner on December 22, 2003, indicates that there are conflicts with the proposed site plan and County's '-' ...,.¡ , December 23, 2003 Page 2 Subject: Ft. Pierce Annexations minimum development codes. The development use proposed for annexation Ordinance K-256 is a 112 unit residential development. The development use proposed for annexation Ordinance K-257 is a 28,000 square foot commercial building. We are aware of what is generally going on on these properties through the direct contact of the property owners with the County. The City has not provided any information about the pending annexation of development plans for these properties. Staff recommends that the Board authorize the Chairman to sign a resolution initiating the Conflict Resolution Process with the City of Ft. Pierce in regard to proposed Annexation Ordinance K-257 and further that staff be authorized to appear at the City Commission meeting of January 20,2004 to express our concerns on this matter. Staff further requests that authorization be given to formally request that the County be a full review and comment agency for any development proposal that may be filed on the properties associated with City of Ft. Pierce annexation Ordinance K-256. If you have any questions, please let us know. irector DJM FTPIERCEANNXE14a(H) Attachments cc: County Administrator County Attorney fÌ. ocC:.1:..~ I::'C'C 0ü .0 ,.I!..!i!i:l ~ ..-:E ,.IL: "':j; i=cri:: " 1'.'. '1::0 c::!t.!.! c c::i" ~ ... "'~p5:¡;'- E !1'èiI!i~iI;~ ~ ':Jf~¡'il ..!s .2S...~_ =0'5 ,~ J ",",~c" .- b~ 'Eig!~1Uf¡'Ö ,; ~ ~..iii Ii 1: 8.;! g>~ (.),&':-'·c . eo:; ë ··..-aEZ.. ~'¡1.f.!;8 E ~ c.J'a¡:_ ....c: ~lCl).:g~~~~ h '-' .... '" '" ~ ó z B c: .. c: 'is ð , 'Za: ~~ow ã:ffio~ ffi¡¡:j:!:!<w 1-1-5~~ wa:OOw :z:0--' > 1-....>....< ....I-0t:¡ ~offia::w: _>D.wa: ~!::~~~ wUD.o¡:¡;: ~w~u5 w1=::JI-O ~....G~~ zO~:tz < (/)o:z:< zl-I-I-O õ~<'ê:~ :3:::::;genG¡ --,a: --' z<oW::J __....:Z:O -a::u.~m ..., ~ Ê.è i~ 0 D. Q, u.... 4U.! pj.! CÞ_" .c-c:o=- ... 0 ;!... c: . 1ã-~~.~~ ..9.0"0 ca!. Q..- .c. ..!!""E!t1t: a.~Ia.!.o ~.cOCÞtnZ .... g.=.=o ~~a.b~~ E'E-c c.....-.. fl)J1¡.2:Š~ .!! enQ.",~ t:.! 'c= 1: '" ,.;!i!:.- c."C u Ii .,u ""Ii;""...;.; CD cii..Qu'"O v; &:s Q=SO¡: CÞ c: .... CD·-O 0 ¡oc: 0- ~ LL - Z"O ~'O..ft) a) .=z ::s :r~ E - u 0-= ...!!.!!! :ë(=o.UCUo.. w~~a:.~66< 01- < a::::Ew Woo:z:oo..¡::o.. /j :Z:1-:3utl::...en~ r/¡) I- u::JzOj:!:! ...J(I)w(l) UJ «a::»~w:Z: wz z< :z:1- o..o«:E81-:z: ~¡;¡I-zzwo!d (/)<_oa:z:z: o~¡:o!2::Eõ:t I-::E ww¡::::Jz oo°!!:o..<Go zU~à:Z:IDZo.. >2»wuffi-::J w!::oa:::J>ww wu< (/) Cu en ~I-<~z Z~~(/)~I-""'~é Ol-oOI-<~>~ en....zz :z: W< a:o-õCl-en ID w OwZwOCw o..ZOw<a::~ZID >Owu....::JC<O z!!?:3~~entl::>1- <u....o..o..~uz~ 8 N aì '" .!!! ill.. .. .. Æ ~ !! B "" .. c->< ..:;¡ :2ü ~m ð1: :51e i!ü ,tf.~ .'_'.__·n 5~ g g'ã.~tað ' . <.:10 .g e.è ~.~ 0 ~~~~~66< ow<z~ ài'~'O'~ U...: I-U _co a..c.. Uu.. I- a:::Ew ii:¡¡:æ:!g~~~ ä:ffifi::s2~ Q)~ ,~! ~-" WOC:z: co.. ¡:: 0.. ~ z "'C «J -(/) en a:¡¡:l-zO £~~s~~ :z:1-:3utl::....en~ I 0 ~ c8.~ c c::) ':0 ~1-5::::¡t;; I- u::>zOj:!:! 2) .f '" :¡s:¡;.- E --:S~._~ (l)w(/) w ~ ....N:J~>.c . ~:3g~~ ~iOCDg;::) ~<a:»Ow:z: 'õ ~ &ña... 0 j 5 a. wz z<a::z:1- I-....~~o IV Q. Q..- .J:. o..o«:E81-:z: ~~ ~'" ~"¡¡tsZ~ :g ..g¡¡¡E!¡t: ~i2!;(~t5~~~ I a:z ë:ï0 ~~ ~ ~8': <.:I~a:o~ a.....flla. 0 '" z ~èiõ< ~-s 8. G!z ~< ~ o:i¡:o!2::Eõ:t gfa .,~i.J: g-r:~ IV ó õ>o .U >'¡ e:':8 I-::E Ww¡::::>z .... ~._, ..... ~ U) ø z5f!¡g 8 ...U ga. .... c: Z IV"'C Q.o..e- oo°!!:o..<Go .. en CI).- ~~ õ CD ~ co 0.0 œ B w 0 E:;:EðQ)~ zU~à:Z:IDZo..' N c:=-g~-.g E.! c ~w~a:~é .;~~'ß.~:J: >2~>wuffi-::> ¡!j' of OOOOOG~ . w1=::>offi< w oa:::»ww .' .¡¡-~Në !u:§ c --'Zo..O ~! .'f¡~.~ wü< en 0u E~', =ë WLL,U::::¡oa: UI '~I-<~z ·m .!!ë c: ~IÞ" ã'i.. 0 ~o~:W:a:o c."" B g¡ .u zW~en<1- ~é lj ! I E~o::lEc:._ "" ¡¡ ; ~~.! B~ ~ E..= c:ü 8 III "'.!! <(/)ozo..~ o¡:o<.:l¡:<~>~ t;¡ E " 15 0"'- "'.. :.- C'S z!::I-::::¡o~ 1;; &:¡;; &=='c !2....z~o1=enw~ !! 8 u[~"c Eic õ::E .IDZZ !.5 o.!l"i0~ wOõoz OOw ~~ £! z ~·:~:-ggE; a:-<:E< ·-~ã"C..c: taU o....g~è¡¡¡ .æ:"'C ~"'C..cø,¡ o..Z<.:ltl::<~~ZID "," I . (.)·ä =-~=.~! z~gi~~ '=:J:=:¡:;~~~ >owg....::>o<o enü cn§ .. .- !_J!!::IC "'.c.- - u 8.-= ...!!.!!! z!!?:3a:~entl::>1- ~.~ :g~ ,Ii "(I)I-o~:t:_.,, <a:... a: :ë(= ucUo.. <u....o.. ~uz~ _u a..... '-" ...., I I Q) ........Q) 00 ........ ü::J C :::J 0 0.. ~o.. 00 ........ ........00 COO .:t= CO OOü'- 000'- E X CO:.=: '"0 coü'"O Q) Q)'+-- Q) - :...J C ~cco ~ CO c~ cooO) cooO) ~ üQ) ........Q) «0 ·-0 0 C - c........- 00 oo'è oü'è N '"ON ~""""o .- Q) 0 ~~ .........--. 0) CO........·- CO..c~ X 0"""" X:::J:::J CO) oCO Q):::J ~C Q)·--.O Q)OO- 0..:::J C........O OO'C C..o 00 . X 0.. OC C:::JQ) COOO ~CO «oo~ «C~ UJCf.) CLJ /" 0' /// ~~./--/ §.~.;:;::::::--_.... .- µ soù\'(:I /.@..~...'.': ..~.,/ '(;i. ..,/ .c:T;; '0.'0 Ò \ \'0 . ~ .// r<~., . ~ è' 'C II: ~ ~ ~ t5 OJ 3 C\I C\I :;;;, 8- ~ 01 o ..0 xl 0) C C o 0)' ~ 0) 'ã. ;1=1 -- . u5 PI:! ÁJ!ea JOÁel ÁMH sflU!>i PI:! alOu!waS Agenda Request ,...,., Item Number: (þß Meetina Date: Jan 6, 2004 '-' Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [ X ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ SUBJECT: Consider staff comments to the City of Port SI. Luci regional wastewater treatment facility (McCarty Roa e). On Monday, January 12, 2004, the City Council for the City of Port SI. Lucie will be holding a public hearing for the purpose of conducting the equivalent of the County Commissions Final Public Hearing under our (the County's) Conditional Use review procedures as set forth in Section 11.07.00 of the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code. The purpose of this Conditional Use Public Hearing is for the City to consider authorizing the development of a 6 million gallon per day, regional wastewater treatment plant on property located at the south end of McCarty Road. This application for Conditional Use was filed for, by, and with the City of Port SI. Lucie on December 12, 2003, and is being processed by the City pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 171.062(2) Florida Statutes, which read as follows: irector To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development BACKGROUND: 171.062 Effects of annexations or contractlons.- (2) If the area annexed was subject to a county land use plan and county zoning or subdivision regulations, these regulations remain in full force and effect until the municipality adopts a comprehensive plan amendment that includes the annexed area. Since as part of the recent annexation of the parent parcel on which this wastewater treatment plant will be located, the City elected not to change the Future Land Use or Zoning designations of the parcel, they are proceeding with the development review of this new facility in accord with the provisions of Section 7.10.13 of the County's Land Development Code. Attached is a copy of the application material that the County requested from the City in regard to this Conditional Use petition. We received this petition on December 29, 2003. FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: N/A N/A At this point the Board has essentially two options. Option one, is to submit comments to the City of Port SI. Lucie that based upon our review of the information obtained from the City, the application for Conditional Use Permit as currently submitted is incomplete/deficient, and if it were to be reviewed by the County, final action on it would likely have to be delayed until the cited deficiencies were corrected. Option two is that assuming that the City can address the above cited deficiencies prior to the final review of this application on January 12, 2004, and further assuming that the City has adhered to all of the County's minimum notice standards in the review and processing of this Conditional Use application, staff recommends that the Board considered forwarding the attached special conditions to the City for review and consideration in any final approval orders for the Conditional Use! Site Plan for this facility. RENCE: COMMISSION ACTION: [X] APPROVED c:=J OTHER D DENIED Approved 5-0 Option Two - ouglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Coordination/ Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: (agend764) ~ ...., COMMISSION REVIEW: January 6, 2004 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: DATE: Community Development Director January 2, 2004 SUBJECT: Port St. Lucie Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant! Conditional Use Permit Review On Monday, January 12, 2004, the City Council for the City of Port St. Lucie will be holding a public hearing for the purpose of conducting the equivalent of the County Commissions Final Public Hearing under our (the County's) Conditional Use review procedures as set forth in Section 11.07.00 of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. The purpose of this Conditional Use Public Hearing is for the City to consider authorizing the development of a 6 million gallon per day, regional wastewater treatment plant on property located at the south end of McCarty Road. This application for Conditional Use was filed for, by, and with the City of Port St. Lucie on December 12, 2003, and is being processed by the City pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 171.062(2) Florida Statutes, which read as follows: 171.062 Effects of annexations or contractions.- (2) If the area annexed was subject to a county land use plan and county zoning or subdivision regulations, these regulations remain in full force and effect until the municipality adopts a comprehensive plan amendment that includes the annexed area. Since as part of the recent annexation of the parent parcel on which this wastewater treatment plant will be located, the City elected not to change the Future Land Use or Zoning designations of the parcel, they are proceeding with the development review of this new facility in accord with the provisions of Section 7.10.13 of the County's Land Development Code, which reads as follows 7.10.13 SEWAGE AND SEPTAGE TREATMENT FACILITIES IN AGRICULTURAL ZONING DISTRICTS In the AG-1, AG-2.5 and AG-5 zoning districts, the establishment of a sewage and septage treatment facility may be authorized as a conditional use, subject to the following criteria: A. A minimum of ten (10) acres shall be required for all treatment facility sites. B. No structure, treatment storage area or treatment facility shall be located within fifty (50) feet of any property line or required base building line. C. All areas of development shall be fenced or walled. A minimum twenty (20) foot wide landscape barrier shall be provided around the perimeter of the treatment facility. This buffer shall contain at least one tree for eve/}' thirty (30) linear feet around the '-' ,..,., January 2, 2004 Page 2 Subject: Port St. Lucie Regional Wastewater Treatment PlanV Conditional Use Permit Review perimeter. Trees, shrubs and hedges must comply with the requirements of Section 7.09.00. D. All entry and exit points must be gate controlled. All gates must be constructed with an opaque material. Except for business operation hours, all gates are to be kept closed and locked. E. A site plan of this facility must accompany the application for conditional use. Attached is a copy of the application materials that the County requested from the City in regard to this Conditional Use petition. We received this petition on December 29, 2003. County Staff has looked over this material and would offer the following comments in regard to the application. Please note that our review has been based solely from the perspective of technical compliance with the County's Land Development Code. Following these review comments, a recommendation as to what further actions, if any, that the Board may wish to consider in regard to this matter has been provided. 1. The application form incompletely and incorrectly, identifies the Property Tax 10 numbers for the subject parcels. The correct Parcel 10 numbers are; 3317-111-0000-0000/3, 3317-130- 0000-0000/4; 3317-331-0000-0000/9. 2. The site acreage on the application form does not match the cumulative total from the parcel maps. The application indicates a site area of 407.63 acres, adding up the tax maps indicates a total of 409.63. This needs to be verified and/or corrected. 3. Item #2 in the descriptive text of the application for Conditional Use indicates that the City will provide the County with a copy of the proposed site plan for this new regional wastewater treatment facility. To date, the only copies of this plan that we have been provided are those that are attached to this application. (see site plan comment section below for additional comments) 4. Item #3 in the descriptive text of the application is an incomplete answer to the questions proposed. Were this application to be processed under the review authority of the County, Staff comments would be that the applicant elaborate further on exactly how this proposed use is considered to be compatible with the surrounding land uses. What is being done, through the design of this project, to ensure that the proposed use will not have a negative effect on the adjoining properties and land uses? 5. Item #4 in the descriptive text of the application for Conditional Use should be expanded. Why is it necessary for the City to consolidate the three (3) current waste treatment plants into one? Why is this site the optimum location for this particular activity? Were other sites considered and to what extent were they considered and why were they ultimately disqualified? 6. Item #5 in the descriptive text of the application for Conditional Use is an incomplete answer to the question. Were this application to be processed under the review authority of the County, Staff comments would be that the applicant elaborate further on exactly how this proposed use would impact upon public facilities in the area, specifically; roads, drainage and groundwater quality. The citation that the development of this facility will "...provided ~ January 2,2004 Page 3 """ Subject: Port St. Lucie Regional Wastewater Treatment PlanV Conditional Use Permit Review the utility service needed for additional economic growth." misses the point of the question in assessing the impacts of the proposed Conditional Use activity itself on the adjacent public facilities and publicly responsible facilities in the area. 7. Item #6 and #7 in the descriptive text of the application for Conditional Use address a number of general issues related to the development of this site as a regional wastewater treatment facility. The following comments address the areas discussed: Site Liahtina: Noise: Odor: Envi ronmental: the petitioners have provided a report that addressing the lighting matters on this sire. In short, it appears from this summary that the site lighting is not expected to impact upon the adjacent properties in the area. However, what is missing from this information are any details as to the vertical and horizontal placement of the on-site lighting fixtures. Copies of a specific site lighting plan have not been provided to the County. Will any lighting fixtures be placed on top of the equipment in this facility? Will any high-mast lighting be used? The report indicates that light trespass will not occur due to the distance of this facility from the adjoining property lines, but what about future phases of development? The report fails to adequately address what happens when the plant site is expanded to its ultimate configurations. The petitioners have submitted a noise report that provides a conclusion that under both Phase I and build out development scenarios, the operation of this plant would not violate any adopted local noise ordinance. Frankly, at this point of the game, County Staff has not been able to verify or dispute the claims in this report. It appears that the method of acoustic measurement used in the petitioner's assessment report is different than what the County uses. Until the County has an opportunity to further review this report with our noise consultants, we cannot offer any specific comments on this matter. The petitioners have submitted an odor report that provides a conclusion that under both a Phase I and Build Out development scenario, the possibility of detectable odors is low to extremely rare and infrequent. The report indicates that the highest probability of detecting odors off-site will occur when the plant is fully expanded to its 24MGD capacity. However it is also likely that additional odor control techniques, yet to be developed, will be employed to reduce those emissions at that time. The petitioners have included in their application form a statement that the site has no wetlands; therefore they have not submitted an environmental impact report. Were this application to be processed under the review authority of the County, Staff would cite that the application as being fundamentally deficient because it fails to meet the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(S) of the County's Land Development Code. Under that Section, unless waived by a specific ~ ...., January 2, 2004 Page 4 Subject: Port St. Lucie Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant! Conditional Use Permit Review action of the Board of County Commissioners, which would be based upon a formal recommendation of County Staff, an Environmental Impact Report is required. 8. To the best of the information provided to us, the application has not addressed the requirements of Section 11.07.03{D) of the County's Land Development Code. Were this application to be processed under the review authority of the County, a sign-off from the Fire Department would be a required prerequisite before this matter were scheduled for review by the final decision making body. 9. The project application indicates that site access will be via a two-lane roadway out to Glades Cut-Off Road. This roadway will be constructed across private property, along the south/southwest corner of the LTC Ranch site. Were this application to be processed under the review authority of the County, the following questions would be asked: a. Why are you not using McCarty Road as the access route to this site? b. Does the petitioner own the access roadway into this site from Glades Cut-Off Road? If so, why is it not included in the legal description for the property? If not, copies of all access easement would be required. c. If the petitioner is not proposing to use McCarty Road at all, then in order to avoid the implementation of the provisions of Section 7.05.07 (Provisions for Access to New Development Activities), of the County's Land Development Code, the City would need to include a specific development order restriction precluding access or use of McCarty Road by any development activity from his site. 10. Under the provisions of Section 7.10.13 (Sewage and Septage Treatment Facilities in Agricultural Zoning Districts) of the County's Land Development Code, were this application to be processed under the review authority of the County, the following represents a brief assessment of the completeness of the submitted site plan based on the requirements of Section 11.02.09 of the County's Land Development Code Section 11.02.09(A)(1) Section 11.02.09(A)(2)(a) Section 11.02.09(A)(2)(b) Section 11.02.09(A)(2)(c) Section 11.02.09(A)(2)(d) Section 11.02.09(A)(2)(f) Section 11.02.09(A)(2)(g) Section 11.02.09(A)(2)(h) Section 11.02.09(A)(2)(i) Section 11.02.09(A)(3)(a) no site plan application was submitted. no aerial photo was submitted. no detailed location sketch of the proposed development was submitted. no topographic survey was submitted no boundary survey was submitted no floodplain information was submitted no drainage basin information was submitted no drainage basin information was submitted An illustrative plan of the existing vegetative conditions on the project site, was not submitted. The submitted site plan incompletely and incorrectly, identifies the Property Tax ID numbers for the subject parcels. The correct ParcellD numbers are; 3317-111- 0000-0000/3, 3317-130-0000-0000/4; 3317-331-0000- 0000/9. \..- ..".¡ January 2, 2004 Page 5 Subject: Port St. Lucie Regional Wastewater Treatment Plant! Conditional Use Permit Review Section 11.02.09(A}(3}(p) Section 11.02.09(A}(3}(q) Section 11.02.09(A}(3}(r) Section 11.02.09(A}(3}(s) Section 11.02.09(A}(3}(t) Section 11.02.09(A}(3}(u) Section 11.02.09(A}(3}(v) Section 11.02.09(A}(3}(w) addressed not addressed not addressed addressed partially addressed partially addressed addressed addressed addressed appears to be addressed not addressed not addressed not addressed not addressed - if site plan is not to include future phases, then a major adjustment! new conditional use review would be required prior to the issuance of any final development authorizations. addressed addressed appears to be addressed not required not addressed addressed not addressed How is the treated effluent from this site going to be disposed of? Does this facility include a reclaimed water production unit? How will the required perimeter buffers be maintained? How will the required perimeter buffers be irrigated? How tall will any telemetry or radio towers be that may be located on this site? Section 11.02.09(A)(3)(b) Section 11.02.09(A)(3)(c) Section 11.02.09(A)(3)(d) Section 11.02.09(A}(3}(e) Section 11.02.09(A}(3)(f) Section 11.02.09(A}(3)(g) Section 11.02.09(A}(3)(h) Section 11.02.09(A)(3)(i) Section 11.02.09(A)(3)ü) Section 11.02.09(A)(3)(k) Section 11.02.09(A}(3}(1) Section 11.02.09(A)(3)(m) Section 11.02.09(A)(3}(n) Section 11.02.09(A)(3)(0) In addition to the above, the following items from Section 7.10.13 of the County's Land Development Code still need to be addressed: Section 7.1 O.09(A) Section 7.10.09(8) Section 7.10.09(C) Section 7.10.09(D) Section 7.10.09(E) addressed addressed not addressed not addressed partially addressed 11. Public Hearing Process: Sections 11.07.05(C) & (D) of the County's Land Development Code, identify the procedures for the conduct of a public hearing associated with the Conditional Use review process. It is assumed, but not confirmed, that the City has provided proper notice of these hearings to all owners of real property within 500 feet of the outer perimeter of the 409-acre parent parcel, and not just the area of construction activity. The more restrictive notice procedure would be consistent with County's practices in like conditions. It is further assumed, but yet to be '-" ,.",., January 2, 2004 Page 6 Subject: Port St. Lucie Regional Wastewater Treatment PlanV Conditional Use Permit Review confirmed, that the City has posted a public hearing notice on the property consistent with the requirements of the County's Land Development Code. It is assumed that since the City has elected to follow all of the Conditional Use procedures set forth in the County's Land Development Code, they will also adhere to the provisions of Section 11.07.01 (C), should they become a factor in their review. The specific paragraph in question reads as follows: C. REQUIREMENT FOR FOUR-FIFTHS VOTE WHEN PROTEST IS FILED In the case of a written protest against an application for a Conditional Use Permit, signed by the owners of fifty (50) percent or more of the area within five hundred (500) feet of the property affected by the proposed action, such Conditional Use Permit shall not be approved except by the favorable vote of four-fifths (4/5) of all of the Board of County Commissioners. Publicly owned right-of-way, although included in calculating the distance of five hundred (500) feet referred to in the previous sentence, shall not be included in determining the total of the area lying within five hundred (500) feet of the property involved in such proposed permit application and the percentages referred to. ************************* At this point the Board has essentially two options. Option one, is to submit comments to the City of Port St. Lucie that based upon our review of the information obtained from the City, the application for Conditional Use Permit as currently submitted is incomplete/deficient, and if it were to be reviewed by the County, final action on it would likely have to be delayed until the cited deficiencies were corrected. Option two is that assuming that the City can address the above cited deficiencies prior to the final review of this application on January 12, 2004, and further assuming that the City has adhered to all of the County's minimum notice standards in the review and processing of this Conditional Use application, staff recommends that the Board considered forwarding the following special conditions to the City for review and consideration in any final approval orders for the Conditional Use/ Site Plan for this facility. 1.) The granting of the Conditional Use authorization on this property is specifically conditioned upon the petitioner filing an amended site plan with both the City and the County demonstrating full compliance with the requirements, codes and standards of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code as it relates to this type of development 2.) No access to McCarty Road will be permitted from this site, with exception of emergency vehicle use only. For the purpose of this condition, emergency vehicle use is defined as use by, of or for a recognized public safety agency in St. Lucie County. This does not include general construction or utility use traffic. 3.) A driveway connection permit from St. Lucie County will be required for any access point proposed to Glades Cut-Off Road. ~ -.....I January 2, 2004 Page 7 Subject: Port St. Lucie Regional Wastewater Treatment PlanV Conditional Use Permit Review 4.) As part of the operation of this site, as long as and until there are no longer any adjoining areas of unincorporated County to the parent parcel described by the following parcel ID Numbers (3317-111-0000-0000/3, 3317-130-0000-0000/4; 3317-331-0000-0000/9), including all divisions or reassignments of these parcel numbers, the stricter of the either the City of Port St. Lucie or St. Lucie County's Noise Regulations shall apply to the operation of this facility. 5.) Prior to any development authorization beyond the areas indicated as Phase I development, the petitioner shall conduct a new odor analysis to determine what, if any, odor issues need to be addressed as part of the development of the future phases of this project. The petitioner shall use, to the greatest extent of being cost feasible, all available advances in technology that provide for the elimination of odor from this facility and its operations. 6.) All site lighting shall be designed and located in a manner whereby no direct source of light or glare from anyon-site lights is be visible from any adjoining properties. 7.) A minimum perimeter buffer width of 500 feet shall be maintained around the entire facility site, as indicated on the project site plan. This buffer area shall by January 1, 2010, be cleared of all existing citrus plant material and revegetated with native upland plant species indigenous to this region of the State of Florida. This natural buffer area shall be the permanent maintenance responsibility of the petitioner or their assignees and shall be maintained relatively free of all exotic plant materials. If you have any questions about the above material, please let me know. SUBMITTED: DJM PSLWWTP2(H) cc: County Administrator County Attorney '-' ~ City of Port St. Lucie Planning & Zoning Department Memorandum December 29, 2003 Randy Stevenson Community Development Department St Lucie County 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft Pierce, FL 34982 TO BE PICKED UP Reference: Wastewater Treatment Plant Dear Mr. Stevenson: Per your written request please find the enclosed copy of the site plan and conditional use permit application. If you have any further questions regarding this project, please contact me at (772)-344- 4309 or (772) 871-5124 (FAX). Since. reIY"./:./ ~/'7/._.. ........._.....q... , /'/../ /..//-- '''- L/",/ ,,/ ./ .:-- r _...~,., /' ¿;.---:.../ , --- ¿ /..~ Daniel Hélbrook, AICP ..---' Planner CC: Cheryl Friend, Acting Director of Planning & Zoning (w/o enclosure) ENCLOSURE .:: '-" ....; OFFICE USE ONLY DATE FILED: REVIEW FEE: CONCURRENCY FEE: RECEIPT #: RECEIPT #: SITE PLAN #: RESOLUTION #: CERT. CAPACITY#: . St. Lucie County Community Development 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 561-462-2822 APPLICATION FOR CONDITIONAL USE Directions for Submittal Please complete the requested information and submit all items to the St Lucie county Department of Community Development at the address listed above. The proper non-refundable application fee must accompany all applications. For additional details on the infonnation necessary for a submission of a site plan adjustment, please refer to Section 11.02.00, of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. For assistance in submitting the application, please contact the St. Lucie County Community Development, Planning Division. Property Size Review Fee Concurrency Fee Less than 10 Acres $500.00 $25.00 More than 10 Acres $800.QQ $25.00 Conditional Use Review Fees Following notification that the application is complete, this petition will be scheduled for the next available Planning and Zoning Commission meeting. The Planning & Zoning Commission meets on the third Thursday of each month. Presentation to the Board of County Commissioners is dependent upon scheduling before the Planning and Zoning Commission. Please allow a minimum of 90 to 120 days for completion of the public hearing process following the certification of this petition. Initial submissions shall include the following: I. One (I) original of the completed conditional use permit application. 2. One (I) copy of a site plan graphic (min. 8 ~.. x II") or survey depicting the location of the proposed building. 3. One (I) copy of the St. Lucie County Property Tax Map (Scale I :200) with the property under petition highlighted. Special Note: .:. Under the provisions of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, a petition for a conditional use is considered to be a Final Development Order. Under the definition of Final Development Order, and consistent with the County's concurrency regulations, sufficient capacities must be demonstrated in all areas of required level of service before this petition can be approved. Should it be determined that insufficient services exist, no Final Development Order will be issued until the cited insufficiencies are corrected. For additional information on concWTCncy, please contact the Department of Community Development, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL 34982. .:. Some Conditional Use applications will require the submission of a site plan in conjunction with the Conditional Use review. No scheduling of the Conditional Use review before the Planning & Zoning Commission can be authorized until the site plan is determined by the Development Review Committee to be completed and consistent with applicable County code. For additional information, please contact the Department of Community Development, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL 34982 AIl applications for Conditional Use Permit must be completed and filed with the department before 4:30 PM each business day to meet applicable filing deadlines. For an application submission to be determined complete, all required materials must be present at the time of submission. \.,; ....".¡ PROJECT INFORMATION APPLICATION INFORMATION Name City of Port St. Lucie Address 121 SW Port Sl Lucie Blvd, Port SI. Lucie, FL 34984-5099 Phone 871-5225 - Intersection of McCarty Road and the North St. Lucie LOCATION PROPOSED FOR River Water Control District Canal No 107 CONDITIONAL USE PROPERTY TAX ID # 3317 -331-0000-000/9 3317-310-0000-000/4 3317 -0000-000/3 LEGAL DESCRIPTION (attach See attached Boundary Survey extra sheets if necessary) - SECTION I 17 I TOWNSHIP 36S I RANGE 139E PARCEL SIZE I I ACRES 407.63 I SOUARE FT. I 17.756.362.80 ZONING DISTRICT I AG-5 LAND USE CLASSIFICATION I Amculture - 5 A& stated in the Zoriing DiStriçt Use RegulalioDS for AG-S, conditional use allows for sewage disposal subject 10 the requirements of Section 7.10-13 DESIRED CONDITIONAL USE -. Grove EXISTING USE OF PROPERTY Is a chan2e in Zonin2 sou2ht with the petition for Conditional Use? Yes No X Is a chan2e in Land Use sou2ht with the Detition for Conditional Use? Yes No X Is a Site Plan approval sought with the Detition for Conditional Use? Yes X No The following information you provide is very important in determining the outcome of your conditional use request. It is required by Section 11.06.00, St. Lucie County Land Development Code that appropriate findings be made to justify a Conditional Use approval. Please use additional pages, if necessary to justify your request. - ~ "wII 1. Describe the reason for the request Conditional Use: Please see attached. 2. Is the proposed Conditional Use in conflict with any portion of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code or the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan? Please see attached. 3. How is the proposed Conditional Use compatible with the existing uses in the area? Please see attached. 4. What conditions have changed in the immediate area that warrants consideration of this Conditional Use application? Please see attached. 5. What are the anticipated impacts of the proposed Conditional Use on the existing and future public facilities in this area? Please see attached. 6. What are the anticipated environmental impacts of the proposed Conditional Use? If no adverse impacts are anticipated, please explain why. Please see attached. 7. Please provide any additional infonnation about size, hours, and seasons of operation; number of employees; number of car or truck trips; equipment utilized; anticipated duration of use; impacts of noise and light; ac~ess improvements; hazardous substances utilized; and any other issue that would assist in the evaluation of this application. Please use additional sheets if necessary. Please see attached. '-' ....." Special Notice (please read before signing acknowledgments below) Submission of this application does not constitute the granting of site plan approval. All appropriate requirements must be met prior to this project being presented to the appropriate authority. St. Lucie County reserved the right to request additional infonnation to ensure a complete review of the property/project. Acknowledgments Applicant Information (Property Developer) Agent Information Name: City of Port St. Lucie Name: Address: 121 SW Port St. Lucie Blvd; Address: Port St. Lucie, FL 34984-5099 Phone: 871-5225 Fax: 871-5248 Phone: Fax: Property Owner Information This application will not be considered without the notarized signature of all property owners of record which shall serve as an acknowledgment of the submission of this application for site plan approval. The property owner's signature below shall also serve as authorization for th above applicant or agent to act on behalf of said property owner. Property Owner Signature: me: Mailing Address: (Please-print) Don Cooper Port St. Lucie, FL 34984 City Mana~er Phone: 871-5225 State of Florida County of S ï. L.,~UI Office Use Only Project Reviewer: DRC Review: Approval Date: ~ QøtoaI A. KmamcII MYtallSSDU DODNIIf ~ Augu1124 2007 Notary Public Title IC{9@I!fTlOffMI..WIICUC D{)~311«J') Commission # Comments: '-' ...., Supplemental Information to St. Lucie County Application for Conditional Use for Glades Wastewater Treannent Plant Comment Describe the reason for the request Conditional Use: Response The City of Port St. Lucie wishes to use the land for a new wastewater treatment facility to serve the City's growing needs. Comment Is the proposed Conditional Use in conflict with any portion of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code or the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan? Response The design for the wastewater treatment plant is consistent with the St. Lucie County Land Development Code (Please find the applicable zoning code included in this report). A site plan will be submitted to the County that will ensure that all requirements set forth by the County will be satisfied Please find the attached excerpt from the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Comment How is the proposed Conditional Use compatible with the existing uses in the area? Response The surrounding area is also zoned AG-5 and has the same Future Land Use designation. Comment What conditions have changed in the immediate area that warrants consideration of this Conditional Use application? Response No changes in the immediate area have warranted consideration of the Conditional Use application; however, the City of Port St. Lucie has grown significantly in the past decade. As such, the demands on the existing wastewater treatment plants will soon exceed acceptable levels. Therefore, the treatment plant is needed in order to stay within the capacity levels set forth by the Florida Department of Environmental Protection Comment What are the anticipated impacts of the proposed Conditional Use on the existing and future public facilities in this area? ... Response The proposed Conditional Use will have a positive impact on the public facilities because it will provided the utility service needed for additional economic growth. Comment What are the anticipated environmental impacts of the proposed Conditional Use? If no adverse impacts are anticipated, please explain why. Response No significant environmental impacts are anticipated for the proposed Conditional Use for the following reasons: ¡. The site has no on-site wetlands 2. The plant itself will be surrounded by several acres of undeveloped land 3. All design criteria will be subject to the rules and regulations set forth by the County, City of Port St. Lucie and the South Florida Water Management District. 4. The contractor is expected to use Best Management Practices (BMP's) as outlined by the St. Lucie County Land Development Code regulations. Comment Please provide any additional information about size, hours, and seasons of operation; number of employees; number of car or truck trips; equipment utilized; anticipated duration of use;· impacts of noise and light; access improvements; hazardous substances utilized; and any other issue that would assist in the evaluation of this application. Please use additional sheets if necessary. P:IPn>j-2001\02-109 PSL WWTP Glades 1\4 Epn PlRd\I'onn.\02·I09 Cc>noWonoI SIIpplcmctal.doc Page lof2 '-' Supplemental Information to St. Lucie County Application for Conditional Use for Glades Wastewater Treabnent Plant ....., Response Hours of operation: 24 hrs Estimated number of employees: 3 per shift Number of trips generated per day: J 00 tips per day Impacts due to noise: See enc!osed report Impacts due to light: See enclosed report Impacts due to odor: See enclosed report Access improvements: 2-lane driveway built to St. Lucie County roadway standards Hazardous substances: Dieselfue/, chlorine, hypochloride solution, caustic solution . P:1Prat-2002\02-I09 PSL WWT1' GIodet lid Epa ParccI\Conu'œ-l09 Coaditionol S~.doc Page 2 of2 '-' . ......" Section 3.01.03 ZOning OlStnct Use RegulaÞons c. AG·S AGRICULTURAL - 5 1. Purpose The purpose of this district is to provide and protect an environment suitable for productive commercial agriculture, together with such other uses as may be necessary to and compatible with productive agriaJltural surroundings. Residential densities are res1ricted to a maximum of one dwelling unit per five (5) gross aåes. The number in -cr following each identified use corresponds to the SIC COde reference desaibed in Section 3.01.02(8). TN! number 999 applies to a use not defined under the SIC code but may be further defined in Section 2.00.00 of this code. 2. Pennitted Uses a. Agricultural production - crops C01I b. Agricultural production -livestock & animal specialties CQ2) c. Agricultural services lOTI d. Family day care homes. ~ e. Family residential homes provided that such homes shall not be located within a radius of one thousand (1,000) feet of another existing such family residential home and provided that the sponsoring agency or Department of Health and Rehabilitative Services (HRS) notifies the Board of County Commissioners at the time of home occupancy that the home is licensed by HRS. CWlI 1. Fishing, hunting & trapping 1011 g. Forestry l1li1 h. Kennels. 01S2) . i. Research Facilities, Nonc:;onmeIåaI 1733) j. Riding stables. ~I k. Single-family detached dwellings. ~ j. Telecommunication towers - subject to the standards of Section 7.10.23 .. 3. Lot Size Requirements Lot size requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. ... Dimensional Regulations Dinensional requirements shall be in accordance with Section 7.04.00. 5. Off-street Parking and Loading Requirements Off-street parking and loading requirements are subject to Section 7.06.00. 6. Landscaping Requirements . Landscaping Requirements are subject to Section 7.09.00 7. Conditional Uses a. Agricultural labor housing. III) b. Aircraft storage and equipment maintenance. f451t Adapted August 1. 1890 . AIMsed TmIugh QM)11OO '-' ...., Section 3.01.03 Zoning Distnd Use Regulations c. Airports and flying, landing, and take-off fields. (4511) d. Famly residential homes located within a radius of one thousand (1,000) feet of another such family residential home. eM) e. Fann products warehousing and storage. (4Z21#4ZZ2) f. Gasoline service stations. "'t g. Industrial wastewater disposal. ~ h. Manufacturing: . (1) Agric&AIraI chemicals Ø7) (2) Food & kindred products ØD) (3) Lumber & wood products, except furniture Øt) i. Minng and quanying of norvnetalic minerals, except fuels ('4) j. Retail trade: (1) Farm equipment .and related accessories ...) (2) Apparel & accessory stores lilt k. Sewage disposat subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.13 ...) I. Camps· sporting and recreational (7ID2) m. Off-Road Vehide Parks, except go-cart raceway operation or rentals (71111. subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.21 "'1 n. Outdoor shooting ranges, providing site plan approval is obtained according to the provisions of Sections 11.02.07 through 11.02.09 and Section 7.10.19 of this Code. 8. Accessory Uses: Acœssory uses are subject to the requirements of Section 8.00.00. and include the following: a. Mobile homes subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.05. b. RetaU trade and wholesale trade· subordinate to the primary authoriZed use or activity. c. ~uest house subject to the requirements of Section 7.10.04..... AdcI*d August 1, 1190 19 R.WIed 'T1vcIugh 08101100 '-" ....., This particular pattern of development is somewhat different than the typical coastal community in Southeast Florida. Yet it should be pointed out that St. Lucie County has certain physical differences that serve to discourage the intense urbanization of its eastemmosl regions. Concerns about the further degradation of the quality of the riverine systems of the Indian River Lagoon, the North Fork of the St. Lucie River as well as the Savannas, which could be accelerated through the discharge of stormwater run-off, has lead St. Lucie County to recognize the need to move west of these areas with its more intense development pattems, while maintaining the Urban Service Boundary. Other considerations for developing areas along the western edges of the current urban form are the physical and fiscal constraints faced with increasing development intensities, and providing the necessary transportation and community services in this area. By directing future land development into areas that can be· economically provided with urban services and do not have major environmental constraints, it will be possible to more effectively provide for the future needs of the community. FUTURE LAND USE DESIGNATIONS The following future land use designations are those portrayed on the Future Land Use Map (Figure 1-6). These descriptions provide the intent as well as recommend permitted/preferred uses within each designation. Further descriptions include other uses related to the predominant use which are consistent with the intent of the designation and which would be permitted at the discretion of the County. All residential densities are given in dwelling units per gross acre (du/ac). With the exception of the description of the Special District (SD) classification, these designations are unchanged from the existing Plan. Also included in this section is a description of how the Future Land Use Map addresses certain non-residential uses. As explained later, specific non-residential uses are permitted within a variety of future land use designations without requiring amendments to the map. Anally, Table 1-3, provides a land use district/zoning district compatibility chart that is intended to provide assistance in the application of compatible zoning districts, as currently found in St. Lucie County's Land Development Regulations. LAND USE CATEGORIES AGRICUL TURAL-5 (AG-5) The AG-5 land use designation is intended for those areas of the County outside of the planned urban service area which are associated with agricultural and agricultural-related activities. These areas are recognized for first being appropriate for the production of citrus, cash crops, or ranching activities. These areas are acknowledged as potentially suitable for limited residential development under the following criteria: o All residential development must be in accordance with applicable standards and restrictions as set forth in the Land Development Regulations; St Lucie County Comprehensive Plan 1-23 Future land Use Adoption: March 5. 2002 '-' ...¡ o All residential development proposals in excess of 10 units must be approved through the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process as provided for in the Land Development Regulations; o Any activity other than crop or food product related production, including combinations of properties/uses, in excess of 200 acres should be in conjunction with the establishment of a Community Development District, pursuant to Chapter 190, Rorida Statutes, for the purpose 'of providing the n~ary infrastructure facilities to support that development; and, o Residential densities are set at a maximum of .20 units per gross acre (one (1) unit per 5 gross acres). AGRICULTURAL - 2.5 (AG-2.5) The AG-2.5 land use designation is intended for those areas of the County outside of the planned urban service area which are associated with agricultural and agricultural-related activities. These areas are recognized for first being appropriate for the production of citrus, cash crops, or ranching activities. These areas are acknowledged as potentially suitable for limited residential development under the following criteria: o All residential development must be in accordance with applicable standards and restrictions as set forth in the Land Development Regulations; o All residential development proposals in excess of 10 units must be approved through the Planned Unit Development (PUD) process as provided for in the Land Development Regulations; o Any activity other than crop or food product related production, inctuding combinations of properties/uses, in excess of 200 acres should be in conjunction with the establishment of a Community Development District, pursuant to Chapter 190, Rorida Statutes, for the purpose of providing the necessary infrastructure facilities to support that development; and, o Residential densities are set at a maximum of .40 units per gross acre (one (1) unit per 2.5 gross acres). RESIDENTIAL ESTATE (RE) The Residential Estate (RE) land use category is intended to act as a transitional area between the agricultural areas and the more intense residential areas in the eastern portion of the County. This category is found predominantly along the western edge of the urban form, but is also appropriate for areas of special environmental concern such as along the North ForK of the St. Lucie River and the Indian River Lagoon. St Lucie Co\X\ty Comprehensive Plan 1·25 Future Land Use Adoption: March 5. 2002 ~ '....I TABLE 1-3 LAND USE DESIGNATIONlZONING COMPATIBIUTY MATRIX Zoning '~ LAND USE DISTRICTS AG·S J AG-2.S RE RS RU I AM RH RIC CpubCOM aND PIF MXD SD H - AG·S X X X X X X X AG-2.S X X X X X AG-1 X X X X X RIC X X X X X X X AR-t X X X X X RE-t x x x x X RE-2 X X X X X RS-2 X X X X X RS-3 X X X X RS-.4 X X X X RM-S X X X X RMH-S X X X X RM-7 X X X RM-9 X X X RM-tt X X RM-1S X X -N X X X X X X X X X ...0 X X X X X X X X X CG X X X IL X X IH X X IV X X C C C C C C C x x x x x ... x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x x X "'F X X X X X X X X X X X X -...'" x x x x x x x x x x x X RD X X X X X X X X X X X X X X I.... "00 X X X X X X X X X X X X X X HIRD X X X X X X X X X X X RVP X X x- incicaIee ~ land uaet'zcning canbinaIion C . incicaIee NqUirwnent far CandIIIanII Use 10 inaunt compaIIbIity St Lucie Col.l"lty ComprehensiYe Plan 1-24 Future Land Use Adoption: March 5, 2002 lit IIn 0.... ~....~......,., . !:: . ~ .s -¡: !. i ! . . . ; . ~ .. .. ~ ~ ~ "::!...~ .. ~ .. · ~ ,¡ 'i 'õ:' T i 5 .. · 4 .. · ~ .. ò ~ . ~ ~ .... I ¡ ~ !:: Ñ ~ -... ......-.- 0.....".·..,.. LC'> ·0"'" "".-,....·N .... .~ ...."V....~ c-- "';(!) .., .. J - .. .; ... ~ : : .. ... Ii -- t J !. ~ ¿.-.....-"""\...,,......,., !! .; .. ~- . ~ .. ~ :t ¡ . , I i i ~ ~ .. .. i .. . i 4 ! . ~ ! ¡ t . . . i ~ .. .. i 'i' .: ¡ ~ ! .. . ~ .. .. .. .. ~ c.a-." "^\...."" .... . ,"I" ... ..,,-.. .................. " to . ì i ~ ~ 1 ~ " · .. ~ ~ . .. .. /I · s , /I · , Q ~ ~ ,~ j ~ . Ii .. g '-' ~ ~ ..,- .. - ~ . ....,.. -..... ·s .. ..- A.a......,.... O#-.N....,'N~~'C&~.....·. ....~-... . T . 2 1 ~ 2 ~ " ~ .. ft· .J · ~ .. .. · t · · I - .. 2 J </I Z ~ v .. · · S" " · · I d , ~ j ; i ~ f J f.~ : .= 4 é. . .." ë ¿ J Ii J ; :i ö" .. .. ~ ~ ~ I . , ~ . ~ ¡ ~ ~ f J f : t ~ . , .. "" J i j .i'-.""-"""'\~"""'V .Q.~,...:..~.. .. ~ . 2 ~ ~ .. o N l ..,,,. ..&............ ..... . ï C2I r:: '-' ..tn: 1J:JtS DS I; ! ~ i -- ~ c..... NO.1!., CCUIiI'" iIIIO. I.... y, --mr.-m--------------fr I / I I I I I I I I I,.: I: I- I; I I I I I I I I I I f. j¡ II : Ii I~ ~ ..\:= . ... -r Ie," ¡DC DS 0'. _ ,..___ _. ._ j .. ~ .. ... i ~ - ~ I. I \wi ,./tt . ¡DC DC - I ¡)I 0lIl ..~ Ii I; I- I ,~ nlltt ¡DOC DC ~ ~ ~ ¡ ~ ~ ~ . I '-' JOHN C. LAMB LC, MIES 10812 GANDY BOULEVARD ST. PETERSBURG, FL 33702 PH: 727-576-8488 ...., December 5, 2003 Mr. William Reese Reese, Macon and Associates, Inc. 6415 Lake Worth Road Suite 307 Lake Wo~ FL 33463-2907 "i""':n'1. .........J .J-~ Reference: Lighting Impact Study Port St. Lucie-Glades WWTF Dear Mr. Reese, I have completed your request for a lighting impact study for the exterior illumination proposed for this project. I had previously received a background drawing with pole and fixture locations placed by your consulting electrical engineer. To that drawing I have placed several components to model or simulate the effect this lighting design will have on the adjoining properties. The following is my professional analysis of this proposed design. 1. The fixture selected for use is a "cutoff" style of outdoor luminaire. It has this classification by the Illuminating Engineering Society because the reflector system provides a level of light cutoff above a certain angle, in this case at approximately 80 degrees from nadir. As a result there is zero light above the horizontal level of the fixture. This provides the maximum shielding possible and lowers the perceived brightness of each fixture. 2. The wattage of each fixture and its mounting height above grade are commonly associated as an "industry standard" for this application. This combination of fixture, wattage, and lamp source is found on the majority of exterior illumination. projects of this size and scope. 3. Placement of each pole and fixture contributes to lighting the specific area of roadway and parking hardscape and does not contribute much light to surrounding areas off the paved areas. It would not be possible to decrease spill light any further while maintaining the desired light levels. 4. I have added an accessory to the fixtures located along the main entrance roadway near the south property line. This accessory is a house side shield that mounts to the inside of the reflector providing additional cutoff of light behind the pole. This is a common accessory for poles located along a property perimeter. ., .".- S. The a~onallighting to be utilized on this project, for each specibJuilding and the corresponding tanks and other equipment, will have no affect whatsoever on property line spill and light trespass. All of these buildings are simply too far away to have any contributing effects on offsite light spill. I have reviewed the additional lighting products shown on the complete fixture schedule and I see nothing being used that will cause a brightness issue or spill onto adjoining properties. I was not given overall mounting heights for any of these additional lighting elements but if they are kept below the height of the site poles (30') then there should not be any issues of concern. 6. I also calculated the potential fqr glare problems at the perimeter. The glare rating calculation provides an indication of glare restriction at each point on a grid based on the veiling luminance produced by the luminaires and the environment on an observer's eyes. Glare rating is restricted to horizontal grids of points below eye level and is used in area and sportslighting applications. The values for this glare . rating range between 10 and 90 with the lowest indicating better glare restriction. At no point on the perimeter did we have a glare rating other than 10, the lowest rating there is. I am including an electronic autocad drawing on diskette with this letter. It is in release 2000 dwg file fonnat, which can be incorporated into your construction documents for your future use. The calculation summaries noted above are listed on this drawing, along with the fixture schedule I created and the individual fixture symbols I placed on your drawing in the locations noted by the electrical engineer. If you should need additional infonnation or would like to discuss this further please feel free to give me a call at your convenience. Thank you for the opportunity to provide this design analysis, I hope it meets your needs. Sin~,. ~ J~b ~S Enc!. cc: JH Ham Engineering ~ '-1.. F. Levi ...., Noise Control and Acoustics December 2, 2003. *** Noise Study Report *** Attn.: Mr. William D. Reese, P.E. Arcadis Reese Macon & Assocs. Inc. 6415 Lake Worth Road, Suite 307 Lake Worth, FL 33463 Rei #03-0049A Subject: Noise Study for proposed waste water treatment plant, Saint Lucie County. Dear Mr. Reese: As per our proposal we perfonned a noise study for the above referenced project, for the noise to be generated by the mechanical equipment shown in the layout drawing of said facilities that you furnished us. The estimated noise levels on this study are for two waste water treatment plant sizes, 6 MGD and 24 MGD. The noise level estimates are for worst case scenario, meaning that all noise sources are operating at their maximum capacity, so that the noise levels at the receiving lands are the highest possible. 1. Survev General Information: The following list contains some of the sound measuring equipment used for current background noise levels, recorded for the purpose of comparison to future noise surveys at the waste water treatment plant (noise source) and at the neighboring receiving lands: 1.1 ModuJar Precision Sound Level Meter (SLM) type 2231 by B&K. 1.2 1/3, 1/1 Octave Band Filter Set Type 1625 (20 Hz. to 20 kHz.) by B&K. 1.3 Prepolarized Microphone type 4155 by B&K. 1.4 SLM calibrator type 4231 by B&~ 94 dB @ 1000 Hz. 1.5 Frequency Analysis Module, Room Criteria and Outdoor Noise Quality. All equipment and software used for this smvey complies with current ANSI standard S 1.4- 1983 (R1994), supplement ANSI S1.4a-1985 and SAE 1184 specifications for Sound Data Acquisition Equipment. P.O. Box 32542, Palm Beach Gardens FI. 33420-2542 Phone: (561) 848-9661 E-mail: ati2000@hotmail.com Reese, Mac~ Assocs. Inc. Ref. : 03-0049A ......jige 2 0 f 5 ~udy Report ,@, 111""-' '-8 Tbe Standard of Care for the noise measurements here presented is the current edition of the Land Development Code of Saint Lucie County, noise ordinance in Chapter 1-13.8, which requires a maximum sound level limit of 50 dB A at the property line of the receiving land. Please see attached copy of the said ordinance. 2. Noise Survev Results: The acoustical evaluations documented in this report were perfonned at the proposed site for the waste water treatment plant (WWfP). The proposed WWfP is considered under the acoustic criteria as a Point Source in an open field. Tbe site acoustical evaluations were performed as follows: 2.1 1/1 octave band analysis at the proposed WWfP location. 2.2 1/1 octave band trequency analysis at the receiving land, east of the proposed location. St. Lucie County - Proposed site for the waste water treatment plant 31.5 dBA 38.21 The outdoor background noise level Leq (average sound level for the time of measurement) for this survey at the proposed site, as shown in table 2.3, was 38 dB A. The background noise was governed by unidentifiable sources, meaning that there is not a predominant noise source such that it is clearly noticeable and can be distinguished in the background above all other sounds as a single noise source. Therefore, the acoustical threshold for background noise in this report is 38 dB A. This threshold rœrks the prevailing conditions on an average day with fair weather. 3. Noise Study Evaluations: There are two proposed fucilities considered under this study, a 6 MGD and a 24 MGD WWfP. The noise level estimates for each plant size are as follows: Noise Source Equipment Indoor Noise LøwI dB A OUtdoor Noise Level dB A R8q"d N. R Electrical, GeneratorJ2 Blowers Building. 115 73 45dBA 2 Filter Dosingl2 Injection weD p~. NA 73 . OdBA Ch1orinelColQJressorÆlectrical Building. 80 65 15dBA 2 Reclaimed water pumps and 1 Blower NA 73 OdBA Misc. equipment/operations Leq 12hr. NA 70 OdBA Total Outdoor Sound Level for Point Source 71.63 Tabulation of noise level estimates for 6 MGD WWTP Table 3.a (All values are estimates based on noise data of similar type of equipment) Reese, Mac~ Assocs. Inc. Re£ : 03-004--g-A -Jage 3 of 5 ~udy Report ..--..., '~-::'. ~~.~, ..., '...::... ---- The total outdoor sound level at the proposed facilities, 78.63 dB A (as descn"bed in Table 3.a) is for worst case scenario, which includes the noise &om the electrical generator contained within a 45 dB NR encloSW'e running simultaneously with the rest of the equipment. It is acknowledged that the generator will operate on a very limited basis (power loss episodes and weekly day time exercises). It is included in the analysis to confirm a worst case scenario. The total outdoor sound level at the Point Source without the electric generator rnnning will be 77 dB A. TIùs noise will be constant, 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, year round. The estimated outdoor noise corresponds to a Noise Reduction (N.R.) factor to be provided by means of a Silencer, a Husb House, Sound Enclosure or Sound Treated Housing / Building. Table 3a bas a NR for each noise source, which must be strictly observed to maintain the estimated noise levels at the receiving lands. The NR indicated for each device is feasible and achievable using the above techniques or other noise abatement measures. The noise Point Source irradiates sound energy in all directions with the same intensity, like a sphere (whose origin is located at the geometrical center of the proposed facility, for the calculations used to obtain the noise estimates in this report) which grows outward without bound. The following table contains the estimated noise levels at various distances measured in concentric circles, centered at the WWfP (point source), departing fÌ"om a radius of 200 feet with an average noise level of 59 dB A. The distances are based on the aerial picture scale 1": 1 000' and the electronic Auto CAD drawing furnished to us by Reese Macon & Associates, Inc. Tabulation of maximum noise level estimates at various distances from the 6 MGD Waste Water Treatment Plant At. source AI. 200' AI. Property Une At. 800' At. 1,600' At. 3,200' At. 6,400' 78.63 dB A 59d8A See LaycU 47 cIJ A 44dBA 41 dB A 38 dB A Table 3.b (Values do not include offsite background noise) The estimated maximum noise level at the property lines of the proposed WWfP shown in the attached Layout A-I will be below the local noise ordinance for any time of day. The nearest single receiver of the noise in question is located at approximately 3,000 feet west south-west of the proposed 6 MGD WWTP fåcilities, with an estimated maximum noise level of 42 dB A. The nearest community is located at approximately 4,500 feet northeast of the proposed 6 MOD WWTP fåcility, with an estimated maximum noise level of39 dB A. · . Reese. Ma~ Assocs. Inc. Re£ : 03-0049A .......Jage 4 of 5 ~tudy Report ,.,...--..., (~'. ..~, Noise Source Equipment Indoor Noise L.IMII cI3 A Outdoor Noise L.eveI dB A R8q'd N. R. ElectricaL 2 Generators/4 Blowers Building. 118 76 45dBA 4 Fiher Dosing/4 Iniection weD PUIq)S. NA 73 OdBA ChIorindCormressorÆIectrical Buildin~ 82 62 20cSA 4 Reclaimed water pumps and 2 Blowers . NA 76 OdBA M5:. operations Leq 12hr. NA 70 OdBA Total Outdoor Sound Level for Point Source 80.05 Tabulation of noise level estimates for 24 MGD wwrP Table 3.c (All values are based on noise data of similar type of equipment) The total outdoor sound level at the proposed mcilities, 80.05 dB A (as descnèed in Table 3.b) is for worst case scenario, which includes the noise ftom the electrical generators contained within a 45 dB NR enclosures running simultaneously with the rest of the equipment. The total outdoor sound level at the Point Source without the electric generator running will be 78 dB A. This noise will be constant. 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, year round. The estimated outdoor noise corresponds to a Noise Reduction (N.R.) factor to be provided by means of a Silencer, a Husb House, Sound Enclosure or Sound Treated Housing / Building. Table 3b has a NR for each noise source, which must be strictly observed to maintain the estimated noise levels at the receiving lands. The NR indicated for each device is feasible and achievable using the above techniques or other noise abatement measures. The following table contains the estimated noise levels at various distances measured in concentric circles, centered at the WWfP (point source), departing fÌ'om a radius of 200 feet with an average noise level of 60.5 dB A. The distances are based on the aerial picture scale 1": 1 000' and the electronic Auto CAD drawing furnished to us by Reese Macon & Associates, Inc. Tabulation of maximum noise level estimates at various distances ttom the 24 MGD Waste Water Treatment Plant At source N. 200' N. Property Une At SOO' N. 1,600' At 3,200' At 6,400' 80.5 dB A SO.5 dBA See L.aya.t 49 cI) A 46 dB A 43 dB A 40 dB A Table 3.d (Values do not include offSite background noise) The estimated maximum noise level at the property lines of the proposed 24 MGD WWTP shown in the attached Layout A-2 will be below the local noise ordinance for any time of day. The nearest current single receiver of the noise in question is located at approximately 3,000 feet west south-west of the proposed 24 MOD WWTP facilities, with an estimated maximum noise level of 44 dB A. Reese, M~ Assocs. Inc. Rei: 03-0049A ~. Jage 5 of5 ~tudy Report ~, I .---.. (.·Z. . --- ............. The nearest existing counnunity is located at approximately 6,200 feet east south-east of the proposed 24 MGD WWTP fiIcilities, with an ~t;...Med maximum noise level of 40 dB A. Based on our acoustical coDSUlting experience on this type of fåcility, it is our judgment that the maximUm noise levels at the receiving lands surrottnding the proposed 6 MGD and 24 MGD wwrP, will meet the sound level limits established in the standard of care. Furthermore, the maximum noise levels ftom the wwrP will not have a significant impact on current background noise levels, in the receiving residential or COwwelCial (fiumJand) real estate properties surrounding the proposed WWfP property boundaries. If you have any questions or comments about this report or should you require additional assistance in this project, please call us at your convenience. Fernando Levi Acoustical Consultant .. ..J ~ .. ~i~ , 2 .- II: {ltØa :a '-:Wfi ~ 3~ . ~!I . I u I j Ii ~j~ Ju9 CJ~ z¡: 11111 ¡:ffi Ula x- wfß IIIU a: ~ ¡: z w I a iñ æ æ I ::;¡ ~ w ~ IL I .. ~ ~ c 0 .. . .. J Z w_ I !i ..., a <0( 3 ~ w Õ z \.. .......... (!J~ z¡: ~~ 13- . ! ..---............. ...--........~... ~--.....---.. ...- '-" I!I ~ ~¡~ . ~ ~'i 1 3' ¡!I . , I I ~~ ¡::ffi ClIO ~- ~ !~ ~ ¡:: z !I ~ I iñ ~ w I ~ I- ::! u. w ~ u. r I- it it Ii. 0 l- I I- Z W -. f ~ -< ~ ~ Iii 5 z ........ ..---.....---- ..---......_.. 1 ..~.-.. .. \ '- ~ GLADES WWTP ODOBDmPEBmONMODEUNG REPOBT NoveDlber, 2003 ._ ARCADIS BEESE, MACON AND ASSOCIATES, INC- ttas IAIŒ WORTH ROAD, SUITE 307 IAIŒ woaTll, 11. D46:5 ~ ~~TES~ WEIISTEB ENVIBONIIENTAL ASSOCIATES, INC- ~ EASTPODIT PAlUt BLVD., SUITE It LOUISVILLE,lty 4028 '- .""", CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE GLADES WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ODOR DISPERSION MODELING REPORT TABLE OF CONTENTS ITEM DESCRIPTION PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background................ ............ ......... ........ ............ ....................... ................ ...... 1 1.2 Glades WWTF Description ....................................................... ....................... 1 2.0 ODOR GENERATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF ODORS 2.1 Odor Generation............ .......... ................... .......... .................. ......................... .3 2.2 Odor Panel Procedures ...................................... ................ ............................... 5 2.2.1 Odor Detectability and Recognition .................................................... 5 2.2.2 Hedonic Tone HT ................................. .......... ........................ ............. 6 2.2.3 Odor Intensity ........... ....... .................................. ............................ ...... 6 2.2.4 Odor Persistency ("Dose Response") .................................................. 6 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF ODOR DISPERSION MODELING 3.1 Description of Mode ling........ ........... ....... ......................... .................. ............. 8 3.2 Modeling Output........... ........... ........... .............. ..... ............ .............................. 9 3.3 Modeling Protocol............ ......................... .................. ........ ........................... 10 4.0 PRESENTATION OF MODELING RESULTS 4.1 Description of Modeling Scenarios................................................................ 11 4.2 Odor Emission Rates.......... .......... ............ ............ .......... ................ ................ 11 4.3 Discussion of Modeling Results... ..................... ..............:....................... ....... 14 4.3.1 Base 6 MGD Plant................................ ............................................. 14 4.3.2 Future 12 MGD Plant .......................................................................14 4.3.3 Future 24 MGD Plant ..... ..................... ................ .................. ........... 19 5 .0 SUMMARY OF CONCL USIONS........... .........~........... ............................................. 22 Appendix A Odor Dispersion Modeling Data .................................................................... 23 - . '" ." CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE GLADES WASTEWATER TREATMENT FACILITY ODOR DISPERSION MODELING REPORT INDEX OF TABLES ITEM . DESCRIPTION PAGE Table 1 Odorous Sulfur Compounds in Wastewater .......................................................4 Table 2 . Odor Dispersion Modeling Scenarios...............................................................12 Table 3 Odor Emission Rates ........ .............. .......... ........ ..... ..... ..... ........... ............ ..........13 INDEX OF FIGURES DESCRIPTION PAGE ITEM Figure 1 Plant Site & Surrounding Area .................. ...... .............. ................... ............ .....2 Figure 2 Base Plant (6 MGD) Peak DT Contours .........................................................15 Figure 3 Base Plant (6MGD) Frequency Contours (HrslYr> 7 Drr) ...........................16 Figure 4 Future 12 MGD Plant Peak DT Contours .......................................................17 Figure 5 Future 12 MGD Plant Frequency Contours (HrsNr> 7 D/T) ........................18 Figure 6 Future 24 MGD Plant Peak DT Contours .......................................................20 Figure 7 Future 24 MGD Plant Frequency Contours (Hrs/Yr> 7 D/T) ........................21 -< .,-. ,.., CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE GLADES W ASTEW A TER TREATMENT FACll.,ITY ODOR DISPERSION MODELING REPORT 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Background The City of Port Lucie plans to build the new Glades Wastewater Treatment Facility (WWTF). Reese, Macon and Associates (RMA) is designing the new facility. The design flow for the first phase of the project is 6 MGD, with ìl future build out design flow of 24 MGD. Current planning calls for the plant to be constructed in 6, 12, and 24 MOD stages. Figure 1 shows the plant site, surrounding area, and existing residential areas near the plant site. Webster Environmental Associates, Inc. (WEA) was retained by RMA to perform this odor dispersion modeling evaluation for the initial 6 MGD plant and the future 12 MOD and 24 MGD plant scenarios. The purpose of this evaluation is to assist in identification of the probable odor impact of the plant at the site boundary and on the area surrounding the plant. 1.2 Glades WWTF Description The plant will employ a two step activated sludge process that will achieve secondary treatment for disposal to deep injection wells. Tertiary treatment, including effluent filtration and chlorine disinfection, will also be provided to produce reclaimed water for irrigation. The plant will include the following major processes: · Pretreatment Facility including bar screening and grit removal. · Anoxic / Aeration Basins including anoxic and aerobic cells. . Final clarifiers · Effluent filters · Chlorine disinfection tank · Waste activated sludge storage tank . Sludge dewatering including centrifuges Future expansions will include additional bar screens, grit chambers, anoxic/aeration treatment trains, clarifiers, effluent filters, chlorine contact tanks, sludge storage tank, and centrifuges. Odor control systems are planned to treat air from the pretreatment facility, sludge storage tank, the sludge truck loading area, centrifuges and sludge conveyors in the sludge dewatering building. 309 - (jJades WWTF Odor Dispersion Modeling Report Page 1 11110103 '- ....,¡ Figure 1 '-' ~ 2.0 ODOR GENERATION AND CHARACTERIZATION OF ODORS 2.1 Odor Generation Odor-producing substances found in domestic wastewater and sludge are small, relatively volatile molecules with a molecular weight of 30 to 150 pounds (lbs) per lb mole. Most of these substances result from the anaerobic decomposition of organic matter containing sulfur and nitrogen. Inorganic gases produced from domestic wastewater decomposition commonly include hydrogen sulfide, ammonia and carbon dioxide. Often, odor-producing substances like organic vapors, such as indoles, skatoles, mercaptans and nitrogen-bearing organics are generated. Hydrogen sulfide (HzS) is the most commonly known and prevalent odorous gas associated with domestic wastewater collection and treatment systems. It has a characteristic rotten egg odor, and is directly corrosive to metals and indirectly corrosive to concrete. HzS can be oxidized to sulfuric acid, which causes corrosion of concrete, metals and other materials. Many of the odors detected in wastewater collection and treatment systems result from the presence of sulfur-bearing compounds. A list of common malodorous sulfur-bearing compounds is shown in Table 1. The lower the molecular weight of a compound, the higher the volatility and potential for emission to the atmosphere. Substances of high molecular weight are usually not perceptibly odorous and are neither volatile nor soluble. It should be noted that organic chemicals of industrial origin, particularly solvents, are highly-volatile as well as odorous and may contribute to overall odor emissions. Presence of turbulent or splashing conditions, such as overflow weirs in grit chambers and primary clarifiers increase the release of volatile odorous molecules. On the other hand, if the wastewater is aerobic and such odorous compounds are not present, such turbulence is beneficial because it promotes reaeration and the addition of dissolved oxygen, and thus prevents fOll11ation of odorous compounds associated with anaerobic conditions. Perceived odors are often complex mixtures of odorous compounds acting together to create "an odor" which may have characteristics significantly different from each of the individual components. For this reason, attempts to identify the specific compounds present in an odorous air sample may not be justified when evaluating odor control alternatives. Instead, air samples are typically sent to an odor laboratory where they are analyzed by an odor panel that determines the strength, intensity, and character of the odor. A detailed description of the odor panel procedures is included in the following section. 309 - Gilda WWTF Odor Dispersion Modeling Report Page 3 11/10/03 '-' ..., TABLE 1 ODOROUS SULFUR COMPOUNDS IN WASTEWATER -'-.'- .. ... - n_ __ ..__._ ...___ .... ...... .". _._.__._. ._.__ _. - .- ..- .".. ...-."...--..-- ... --.._- 1..1 .. .... HUU l ~;~STIC l_u~=fLD_u CHrCH-CH,-SH I Strong garlic-coffee I t Amyl Mercaptan J .~-(~£,-CH,- J __Unpl~asant-pulr2d .. .1 _~.0.0~3.u _. iL ~enzyl Mercaptan I CoH~,-SH IUnpleasant~strong I. .. 0.00019 ... 'I.Crotyl Mercaptan .1. C~,-~H;:iH-CH,- .01. .... ._Skunk-like .. . L . 0.000029 . . . I Dimethyl Sulfide J ~,.~:-C~3 _. L ~ec~yed~~ege.tab~e~. L. _O.~OO 1 .. g::~:X~ I.CH'~S-C~,-s ... I ~~ecayed-vegetables I.. 0.0001 Ethyl Mercaptan I CH,-CH,-SH .._Decayed-c~bage .1..... 0.0~019 ____ I Hydrogen Sulfide.t. __. H,S .... 1. __~o~~e~ __.1:. ~00O:7 _.__ L. J:~~ .... I...... CH,SH J. Decayed-cabbage .1 .. 0.00 II I Propyl Mercaptan/.. ~'~CH':CH'~SHJ._.~op~eas~~_~.J. _~00~0~5.. .. L Sulfur DioXide.l So, 'L Pungent, initatingl 0.009 i.._ ~;:;:r:. ... . .'In (~.'¡'~-SH u.I Skunk, unPl:as~t 1 o.~~o~ tu .Thiocresol. [ CH,-C~-:H J__-=lam1c,.~C~du_.j 0:~00062 .. .: t _. ~o~ben~1 . I C,H,SH. l Putrid, garlic.~like I 0.00~~62 _. .. ppm = parts per million Odor threshold = lowest concentration at which compound may be detected by a person with an average to above average sense of smell. COMPOUND I. FORMULA .. ..1.. ._ ~IY~ M",,:a~tan J I 0.00005 -- - Reference: Design Manual: Odor and Corrosion Control in Sanitary Sewer SyStems and Treatment Plants. USEPAJ625/1-85/018. October 1985 309 - Glades WWTF Odor Disp~ion Modeling Report Page 4 11/10103 '--' ~ 2.2 Odor Panel Procedures An odor panel involves human panelists who participate in a series of scientifically controlled sensory tests controlled sensory tests. The most common sensory properties used to characterize odors are: · Odor detectability reported as dilutions to threshold (Dff). · Odor recognition reported as recognition threshold (RT). · Odor intensity or dose/response · Hedonic tone (HT) or pleasantness and · Odor character (word descriptors) A six to eight member odor panel consists of trained personnel who are scientifically screened to detennine their smelling acuity to butanol. The odor panel testing, although subjective, is conducted under strictly controlled "clean" conditions to produce statistically valid results. The odor evaluations are conducted in accordance with ASTM Standard Practice E679-91 (Detennination of Odor and Taste Thresholds by a Forced-Choice Ascending Concentration Series of Limits) and E544-99 (Referencing Suprathreshold Odor Intensity). The dynamic dilution of odorous emissions is a physical process that occurs in the atmosphere down-wind of the odor source. An individual, or citizen from the community, sniffs the diluted odor. The dilution ratio is knoWn as the Detection Threshold. The number of dilutions needed to make the odor emission just detectable is known as the dilutions to threshold (Drrr The RT value is the dilution ratio at which the assessor first recognizes the odor's character. For example, an odor panel's response at Drr maybe "that smells" whereas the odor panel response at RT may be "that smells like a skunk". 2.2.1 Odor Detectability and Recognition --- Drr values reported from the odor panel refer to the number of dilutions of an odorous air sample required before half the panel members are still able to detect the presence of the odor. RT refers to the number of dilutions of an odorous air sample required before haIfthe panel members are still able to characterize or recognize the odor. A high Drr indicates a strong odor requiring many dilutions to render it undetectable. RT values are always less than D/T values because it is easier to detect an odor than identify an odor. The relative magnitude of D/T and RT values indicates the relative significance of odors from various odor sources. 309 - GIada WWTF Odor Dispe~ion Modeling Report Page 5 11/10103 '-' ,..., 2.2.2 Hedonic Tone HT Hedonic Tone (HT) is a measure of the pleasantness or unpleasantness of an odor sample. The hedonic tone is independent of its character. A common scale for ranking odors by hedonic tone is the use of a '21' point scale: I to + 10 o -I to-1O Pleasant Neutral Unpleasant The magnitude of the Hedonic Tone rating, positive or negative, indicates the degree of pleasantness or unpleasantness. 2.2.3 Odor Intensity The Odor Intensity (I) is the relative strength of the odor above the RT. The odor referencing is accomplished by a comparison of the odor intensity of the odor sample to the intensity of a series of concentrations of the reference odorant, which is butanol. The intensity of an odor sample is expressed in parts per million (ppm) of butanol. A larger value means a stronger odor. Comparison of intensity at different locations around the plant indicates the potential for the odor to "hang around". 2.2.4 Odor Persistency ("Dose Response") Odor persistency is a tenn used to describe the rate at which an odor's intensity decreases as the odor is diluted in the átmosphere down-wind trom the odor source. The rate of change in intensity verses odor concentration is not the same for all odors and it is not linear. An equal amount of dilution does not produce an equal change in intensity. In fact, many odor sources are still strong and intense after many dilutions. The odor intensity (I) is related to the odor concentration (C) by the following equation, where 'K' is the constant: I = K(Ct log I = n log C + log K This relationship is a "Dose-Response" function known as Steven's law, or the Power Law. 309 - Glides wwrF Odor Dispersion Modeling Report Page 6 11110/03 '-' ,..", The persistency of an odor can be represented as a "Dose-Response" curve. The result is a straight-line log-log plot specific for each odor with the slope of the line representing relative persistency. A flatter slope compared to the steeper slope represents a more persistent odor compared to less persistent odor. ., ~ 309 - Gildea WWTF Odor Dilpenion Modeling Report Page 7 11/10103 .;.. '-' '..,J 3.0 DESCRIPTION OF ODOR DISPERSION MODELING 3.1 Description of Modeling Dispersion modeling has traditionally been used to predict the impact of emissions from major sources of air pollution, generally as a regulatory requirement. Odor dispersion modeling has also been used as a reliable and cost- effective approach for predicting off-site odor impacts from odor sources and evaluating odor mitigation alternatives. Odor dispersion modeling was used in this study to simulate off-site odor impacts in the community around the plant. The odor dispersion model is essentially a computer program designed to predict what impact an odor source, or group of odor sources, will have on an area based on a number of factors that are input into the program. The primary inputs include: · Odor emission rates from individual odor sources · Odor source dimensions and characteristics · Historic meteorological data The software used to complete the modeling was Breeze ISC GIS Pro Version 4.0.4 developed by Trinity Consultants Inc. This dispersion model is based on the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's (USEPA) ISC model. Breeze is a Gaussian plume model that incorporates source-related factors (air flow rate, stack diameter, odor source area, contaminant concentration, distance from the odor source to particular receptors) and meteorological factors to estimate contaminant concentrations from continuous sources. The modeling in this study uses actual meteorological data from 1991, which is the most recent year full surface and mixing height data is available from the USEP A Support Center for Regulatory Air Models (SCRAM) website. The surface data and mixing height data were collected from the West Palm Beach, FL airport. The data includes the actual hourly meteorological data (wind speed, wind direction, temperature, cloud cover, ceiling height, and mixing height) from every hour of 1991. The infonnation input into the model for this study was Odor Emission Rates (OER) for each point source (sources with stacks &Jor exhaust fans); Odor Emission Rate per square foot for each area source (open channels and tanks); odor source locations, base elevations, discharge heights and size; and the local meteorological conditions. The OER is the Dilutions to Threshold (Off) at the source multiplied by the air flow rate. Existing DfT and air flow data for the Glades WWTF is not available, since the plant is in the design phase. Therefore, Drr inputs are based on samples 30t - Gilda WWTF Odor Dispersion Modeling Report Page 8 11/10103 ,-,. ...,J previously collected and analyzed by WEA for similar processes at other wastewater treattnent facilities. Drr data from the following facilities was used in this evaluation to estimate the Drr in the Glades WWTF processes: · Louisville, KY Morris Forman WWTP · Louisville, KY West County WWTP · Orlando, FL Iron Bridge WPCF · Colorado Springs, CO Las Vegas WWTP · Broken Arrow, OK WWTP The plant site plan and dimensions for all the plant processes and buildings, as well as air flow rates for the odor control systems, aeration basins, and dewatering building exhaust were provided by RMA. 3.2 Modeling Output The model normally outputs the resulting highest hourly average Drr level estimates over the area identified for analysis. The resulting hourly average D/T levels are then shown graphically on odor contour plots. Essentially, the model predicts the number of dilutions in the atmosphere that occur in order to predict a downwind D/T or the detection level of the odor. In this study, the hourly average Drr levels at particular receptor points were converted to peak Drr levels by applying a multiplier to account for short exposure to odors (less than 15 seconds). The peak Drr levels have been plotted. The peak Drr is more relevant for odors, since the odor plume meanders and is very transient. Perceived odor complaints are generally related to peak odor levels, as opposed to an hourly average odor level. The modeling also predicts the frequency of odor events for the areas surrounding the plant. In other words, it predicts the number of times per year odors may be detectable for at least a fifteen second period at any point around the site. For example, a person standing at a point where a frequency of 100 is predicted would be expected to experience an odor that exceeds the odor detection threshold 100 times (or during 100 hours) per year. In this study, an odor detection threshold of seven (7) Drr has been selected. An odor with a detection threshold of seven dilutions or less may not be detected because it could be overwhelmed by other natural odors in the area such as grass, trees, soil and flowers, or it may not be detectable at all. 30t - Glides WWTF Odor Dispersion Modeling Report Page 9 11/10103 .. \w-. ....., 3.3 Modeling Protocol The modeling scenarios were completed with the following modeling protocol settings: · Peak-to-mean multiplier of: (Averaging Period I Peak Duration) 0.5 = (60 min 1(15 sec/60 see» 0.5 = 15.49. based on one hour averaging period, 15 second average peak duration, and 0.5 power factor. · Flat terrain option · 1991 surface and mixing height meteorological data. collected from the West Palm Beach, FL airport (closest available meteorological data). · Threshold of 7 Drr used for the odor frequency modeling. 3œ - GIlda WWTF Odor Dispersion ModeliDg Report Page 10 11/10103 '-' ...., 4.0 PRESENTATION OF MODELING RESULTS 4.1 Description of Modeling Scenarios The odor dispersion modeling scenarios used for this odor evaluation are summarized in Table 2. The Base Plant (6 MGD) model simulates odor levels fÌ'om the plant under the . initial 6 MGD design flow rate conditions. The model includes all significant plant odor sources, which are described in Table 2. The 12 MGD Plant model simulates odor levels fÌ'om the plant with the plant expanded for a 12 MGD design flow rate. The expanded processes and air flow rates used in the model are described in Table 2. The 24 MGD Plant model simulates odor levels from the plant with the plant expanded for a 24 MGD design flow rate. The expanded processes and air flow rates used in the model are described in Table 2. Peak Dilutions to Threshold (Peak D/T) and odor frequency isometric contour maps were developed for each of these modeling scenarios to show the predicted odor impact in the area surrounding the plant. The contour maps are included in the following pages along with a discussion of the results. The modeling input data for each scenario is included in Appendix A. 4.2 Odor Emission Rates The odor emission rates (OER) from the plant odor sources used in the modeling scenarios are summarized in Table 3. The OER is the product ofD/T multiplied by the exhaust air flow rate. . The following methods were used to detennine air exhaust flow rates (din) from the plant odor sources used in the modeling scenarios: 1. Design capacity of blowers or exhaust fans. 2. Estimate of surface air emissions based on surface area of the source and the sweep air flow rate used in a surface emission isolation flux chamber. 309 - Glades wvrrF Odor Dispersion Modeling Report Page 11 11/10/03 II) o .¡: C\1 c: Q) (,) tn LL ~ ..... .- ~~~ :ë1l):E fa Q) c: ....."CO C\1 ._ - II) C) ~ Q) a. II) .- C ~ o "C o en ~ Q) - Q) E CIS ~ CIS Q. C) .5 Q) 'tS o ::E ~ Q) ::.:: c - o Q :; (9 c. ~ .¡: <0 U _ en Q) C -¡ 'tS o ::E '-' II -~ æ.Q u..': o .- ._ co ~- e (¡; èi5:§ -:J -~ .§ ~ o..:,¡:; oc o co 0- - a)~ .§ II ~ -0 :¡:o Eo oiñ -0 00 ;(1) o ,,, .= 0) 0..... CO '0 011 -:J c- N :¡: co (/) II 0 ::: ..: :¡: ': (/) ~ o .- :J <I) - co co > ':::::: '¡;;'c (/)ë~(/)c ~ 8 <I) CO._ - - ua..~CO 0(1) ~ <I)~ 00) :JQ:§-; ~:J ~ (9 2 ~ ~:Š ~ ""== 0;:::" .- c o ..::; ~ <I) '0 <0 ~ ê ':; U o ,¡;;, c .- ~ ~ ai u..~15~ CO 0)<1) ~~=~ -c~ ~3: ê .5 § (j .~ ~ o _ .- (/) en -cco ~ .c_ ·-c-~~ '" ~<I)coQ).æo~'O CO'OE (¡;¡;-U Q)CO c_co1::::: CD '0 0 ¡ß8COO~CCCDQ) '0 Q).- 0 Q)'C 0)0) :J~':=ðo:Jo'O'O (jco~c~:E:2.:!.:! cCDa..«~WUCJ)CJ) I I I I I, I I . I ë co a.. Q) en co CD - E - U o o o. ..- ..- - Q) en co CD en co -Q) Q) E en co co (/) CD - II en ~ ~ cu~ o Q)~ ; E 2 ~ co U CD ëij en (/) en- -..:,¡:; co- _cc CDN NCOco enX x:::- co Q) Q) en ~ Q) en en :J ro' E~ co,.ê ~ co--Ñ'CDxB en'O-:t -Q)en ¡ß -Q) II x~_ Q) O-(¡;'O-CDcgO) :sc~s.!enco~'O o co ~ ... 0 co - o).:! en a.. 2 ~t:.~(j c en .g§~~!!!!!!-E~-g o O)cQ)'so:Jco ~ C '(ñ !E IE U ~ co u..N15 co =_ CD O)Q) ~ ~'''c c~ ::> ..- .:; Õ Q) .s: 1::: CO ::>.s~§-:JOQ)O) 3: .¡ ë :::: ~ := :2 16 .s: - ..,COOQ)U~'O CU en ... .~ .- Q) CO c E Q)~CUCU....._O eno-CO'OCC'" Q)::::COO'OOOQ)Q) "0 .- Q) .- CU .-.- 0) 0) :J"O"')(O~~"O'O õ§ëg:¡::g:g.:!.:! ..5Ua..«I-««CJ)CJ) - .§ U o o O. N ..- I I I , I I . I I - C CO ã.: Q .(9 ~ N ..- Q) ~ :J - :J u.. 'wi ... - Q) E ..0 - ~ 0- :J o E ... 0- U o U en .0 ..:,¡:; ("')0 C II O. lY :¡: ~ Q) ~ ~ II ~ ~ .= :¡: CD 0 CU 0 en (¡j '":" ¡;: ro Q) Q) .= <I) 0) ..a ctI E '0 ..0- :J 2Ñ _~_ü) Om x N-N'O X C II C 0)0 O~ ctI .E t? C) en $ ~ ~~ _~:J~~ :J...... NN,.ê-ctI ..o_-x......x..:,¡:;0) - CO -,,,cC en C~IIQIf)::'cuij <I) --EQ) '0 - (9 ..:,¡:; 0 - CO gc_clY~CoQ)o ...J CO CO ctI ONlY'" 0)- 0en a.. Q) a. I- ..- _ 0) ctI Q) ... x - - 0 .S: 0 .g' oQ'Q)Q)f!?f!?lY'Oêñ:J- '0 (9 a. If) <I) <I) C .:::; .., ü) .§ o ""== C .- - 0 ...J'" 0 ..::; C '(ñ ~ = 0 ..0 0) C ~ ~ .- ..oCU Cis :: Q) 0) '0 .- 0 r-N:¡: -CCC.:!~O ::> 0 U <I) .- 'C (/) 0 0 ::>.J:::;C-:JO<l)-;<O 3:~...OCO_--ctl......... ~ ëij :::: c := ,¡;;, CO c .- = en ~ .2 Q) 0 ~ 0 CU II CO c ëã Q) :;:¡ (ij cu $ := cu ~o enocCU"'cc"'''Oc (1):;00"000<1)"00; '0 :;:; .- .- CO .- ._- 0) CU :::: :J....~x~~ ... _0 C '0 0 :J '0 15 'E Q) ij ëij C 0'0 C o'O'O~Oc"O- U««u..««CJ) « I . I I I I I J . I - C CO a.. Q (9 ~ ~ N <I) ... :J - :J u.. '-' TABLE 3 Glades WWTF Odor Emission Rates ...,J Surface Air Flow Detection Odor Emission %of Area Rate Threshold Rate Total Plant Scenario & Odor Source (tr) (cfm) (1) (DfT) (DIT x cfm) Plant 6 MGD Plant Pretreatment building scrubber 2,000 100 200,000 5% Anoxic Influent Splitter Cells 1,590 200 400 80,000 2% Anoxic Cells 6,240 786 200 157,200 4% Aeration Cells 20,740 6,000 150 900,000 23% Effluent Filters 2,970 374 50 18,700 0% Chlorine Contact Tanks 5,529 697 80 55,760 1% Final Clarifiers 15,708 1,980 50 99,000 2% Sludge Scrubber 11,000 100 1,100,000 28% Sludge Dewatering Building Exhaust 9,013 150 1,351,950 34% Total 6 MGD Plant 3,962,610 100% 12 MGD Plant Pretreatment building scrubber 2,000 100 200,000 4% Anoxic Influent Splitter Cells 3,180 400 400 160,000 3% Anoxic Cells 12,480 1,572 200 314,400 6% Aeration Cells 41 ,480 12,000 150 1,800,000 34% . Effluent Filters 5,940 748 50 37,400 1% Chlorine Contact Tanks 11,058 1,393 80 111,440 2% Final Clarifiers 31,416 3,960 50 198,000 4% . Sludge Scrubber 11,000 100 1,100,000 21% Sludge Dewatering Building Exhaust 9,013 150 1,351,950 26% Total 12 MGD Plant 5,273,190 100% 24 MGD Plant Pretreatment building scrubber 3,000 100 . 300,000 4% Anoxic Influent Splitter Cells 6,360 800 400 320,000 4% Anoxic Cells 24,960 3,145 200 629,000 7% Aeration Cells 82,960 24,000 150 3,600,000 42% Effluent Filters 11,880 1 ,497 50 74,850 1% Chlorine Contact Tanks 22,116 2,787 80 222,960 3% Final Clarifiers 62,832 7,920 50 396,000 5% Sludge Scrubber 16,000 100 1,600,000 19% Sludge Dewatering Building Exhaust 9,013 150 1,351,950 16% Total 24 MGD Plant 8,494,760 100% Notes: 1. Air flow rates for non-aerated surfaces are calculated by multiplying the surface area by the sweep air rate used in a surface emission isolation flux chamber (0.126 cfm/f) '-" .." 4.3 Discussion of Modeling Results 4.3.1 Base 6 MGD Plant Figures 2 & 3 show the Peak DIT and Odor Frequency contour maps for this scenario. The model predicts Peak DIT values barely reaching 10 at the east and south plant site boundaries. These odor levels are very low and would be barely detectable or undetectable. The frequency contours indicate odors from the plant would be detectable (> 7 DIT) very rarely, if ever, beyond the plant boundaries under these simulated conditions. The 100 hour contour indicates odors may be detectable less than 1 % of the time during the year. Freauencies less than 100 hours per year would be considered insÜmificant. and are therefore not shown on the freauency contour maps. The model predicts Peak D/T values less than 7 at the west and north plant site boundaries. This indicates odors from the plant should not be detectable beyond the west and north plant site boundaries under these simulated conditions. The model indicates the existing residences would be unaffected by plant odors under these simulated conditions. 4.3.2 Future 12 MGD Plant Figures 4 & 5 show the Peak D/T and Odor Frequency contour maps for this scenario. The model predicts Peak D/T values less than 20 at the east and south plant site boundaries, These odor levels are low and would be barely detectable, even under peak odor conditions. The frequency contours indicate plant odors would be detectable very rarely beyond the plant boundaries under these simulated conditions. The 100 hour contour stays within the plant boundaries in all directions. The model predicts Peak Drr values barely reaching 7 at the west and north plant site boundaries. This indicates odors from the plant would be rarely, if ever, detectable beyond the west and north plant site boundaries under these simulated conditions. The model indicates the existing residences would be unaffected by plant odors under these simulated conditions. 309 - Gildea wvrrF Odor Dispersion Modeling Report Page 14 11/10/03 '- ...." Fi2ure 2 '- ...." Figure 3 '- ..." Fioure 4 ~ '-' ..., Figure 5 ~ ~ 4.J.J Future 24 MGD Plant Figures 6 & 7 show the Peak Drr and Odor Frequency contour maps for this scenario. The model predicts Peak Drr values reaching 20 at the east and south ·plant site boundaries. These odor levels are faint, but would be considered detectable. However, the fi'equency contours indicate plant odors would be detectable very rarely beyond the plant boundaries under these simulated conditions. The 100 hour contour stays within the plant boundaries in all directions, except the south boundary, where the contour barely escapes the plant boundary. This means, again that plant odors may be detectable less than 1 % of the time during the year. The model predicts Peak Drr values barely reaching 10 at the west and north plant site boundaries. This indicates odors from the plant would be rarely, if ever, detectable beyond the west and north plant site boundaries under these simulated conditions. The model indicates the existing residences would be unaffected by plant odors under these simulated conditions, with the possible exception of the existing residence directly west of the plant boundary. This residence may barely detect very low level plant odors under peak odor conditions, but extremely rarely, if ever. :",; 309 - Gilda WWTF Odor Dispcnion Modeling Report Page 19 11110103 '- '-' Figure 6 '-' ,...., Fh!ure 7 '-' .."", 5.0 SUl\1MARY OF CONCLUSIONS The following is a summary of the primary conclusions from the odor dispersion modeling evaluation: 1. The modeling indicates plant odor levels will be very low under all of the simulated plant scenarios. 2. The existing residences should remain unaffected by plant odors under all plant scenarios. Plant odors should extremely rarely, if ever, be detectable at the existing residences under these scenarios. 3. Additional development around the plant boundaries should be unaffected by plant odors under the 6 MOD and 12 MGD plant scenarios. 4. Additional development around the plant boundaries may be minimally affected by plant odors, without additional odor control measures when the plant is expanded to 24 MOD. However, even under peak odor conditions in this scenario, the modeling indicates any odors beyond the plant boundaries will be very low and extremely infrequent. 5. The highest odor emission rate sources in the 24 MGD plant scenario are the aeration cells due to the large surface area and air flow rates from the cells. The aeration cells make up 42% of the total plant odor emissions in the 24 MGD scenario. The only other significant odor emission sources are the dewatering building and sludge storage tank. scrubber (19% of total plant)-and the dewatering building exhaust (16% of total plant). Therefore, any low level and infrequent plant odors that may be detected offsite under this scenario would likely be aeration basin odors. Aeration basins emit odors that are earthy in character and not normally considered objectionable, especially compared to raw wastewater and sludge processing odors. .; 6. The Drr value assumed for the aeration cells in this modeling evaluation was an average value based on testing at other facilities, and therefore could be somewhat conservative. The City may consider performing some odor testing prior to the 24 MGD plant expansion to determine whether objectionable offsite odors may be expected, and provide appropriate measures to mitigate any potential odor problems at that time, if necessary. 309 - GIIdcI WWTF Odor Dispersion Modeling Report Page 22 11/10/03 '-' APPENDIX A Odor Dispersion Modeling Data ~ . 309 - Glides W'NI'F Odor Dispcnioa Mode1in¡ Report Page 23 ....." 11/10103 - '-r a a .., '" ~ CD HI :..- co C"') c:o ë 5. 0 ... A. I~::: Þ- e .g õ ~ !! 5- In ~ ¡ ffi ! o t:..I"'" Q i .!:~.¥ <¡¡:!. .!:II <¡¡: ~ ... '" '" ~ ... :> 0.. .;¡¡j£ooo 'a >-i!. u 'a ,¡>-ig II U 1 ë '! '!)(8!. A. u Q " ~ 'a .. .. :-g - .. U III jll.Sß "":I ãoø :~ j '¡.5'g õcf:::E c .g .. .. II 00 Q . g c '" u.. " .ë e ~í:? 3...... ~; ~o ~ ,~ ~ > - ð " u ~2 -.. 1: 4;1 ~ß' "" :: :)ë '" " ::¡ u î u "" ~ è. Qj .a E 2 u " " 0:: " on ~ ~ « .g :; w" a:: ~ .. ~~ ~ '01 "S ~ § .= é:: ãi Q. tQ ~ .. .. " ¡;; ¡¡ '5 000 "- ~e Où 1ft . : po. ~ .. .. ~ '¡; .! J .! .. 00 J &,- '" :! c¡i ð .'2 ... 0 :u :~u ä ! 3 ¥ f :! II .. J ..., u. ~ ;J _ ~:!-; o ~ !: t .. .. ii ...c .c ... I- U i~ !I :. 0 ¡¡: a Q Q Q Q 11- 51 Q Q Q ell 00" ... ~£ ... ... N ~ N ... ell on "" Q N on N .c P¡: :t .. ~ . ... ~= .. .. · >- = !'¡: .. . .. .. ... ~= .. :! :! .. .. )( . ~¡: .. g .. . . g .. .. . 00 :! :! .. 'i 00- :! .. .. œ :: "- ... ~ · ii! !'! .. = .. w ci . cO .. · 0 ci ci ci I i ¡¡ 0 ! ~ œ i .; w 0 œ CD ~ on .., ~ .., ... N CD w ! ... CD ..; 0 N ã) 8 8 ~ :& :¡¡ ~ N ..- ,. J. ell ... .., "" CD o. Q ~ ::: <Ø CD ë 0.... a ... N ¡¡:!. .. .., c::i a ~ ê ~ II 8 ~ fj ~ ... ... .., -ù <Ø ... - :l¡: . 0 . 0 . ';;111= ci cO cO cO ci 'V Jl >- '! 0 g 0 U >- 'a i Ê u':: )( 'a 8 g u )( .:= c .. a U j ¡¡ ... c i .. o. ~ u II rJ) Ü 00 ë! on .. Q if: ä ~ .:= .. i .. u ... u u .~ ë! ~ .11 .11 " j ¡¡ J I ~ ¡¡ « w u . g . . ~ ::II o In II ~ 11- a Q 00" ~ ,; ~£ CD CD ... ... ~ "¡: ! ! 1- õ . j,¡: :I g g .! . - ... ... . :: œ ~ ~ ... .. w . .. 0 ci . " . . œ ! w 0 - - œ .., .., i N N W 0 I-- - ãí ~ :& - - J. ... ... o. ~ ... ë ON- c::i a ¡¡:!. "'- ...... ~ ~ ê i i ¡¡: ~ : :¡: 0 0 .;; ¡¡¡; ci cO '! 8ê u- >- 'a ;S g 0 u >- 'V ië uo; )( 'a i ¡: u- )( - - c .!! ~ .. II . .. N Q i .1 ... J J u u :! ~ -!!::-!!:: OIl g "" .. '3 ~ ¡j .. . ~ ::II o In II . .ë ...., j ~ iñ .. D 5 ¡ f > 1 III f ;i IJ u ~ .. ~ II ~ ! II ! !!! ~~ ~ t Ii~ Ii j ~ ~g 1 1~~CI.~l~~ .f~~~li~ ~ã~~~3J~ ~................I........ u ~ .. u. 2 j -I.. ....! _I ii ~ -R'¡ !_).. i1I _ J ii !o _.~ ð ~ ) Illl·~tj·!U ~01~!1II~~ ... c: 19 ri 0 .. <ñ a '0 E '0 '" .. ,... """ 0 Go c:i N ori ?:~"'I:I"= ~ o I .. >Ê~~ ! ~ ,... .. - !~ ~ ~ ~ 4(- Q, i~liZ ~ liê is .JI, !:ë g CI) III: i ~ ! III: ~ ! t:";; Q ì ~~J c ¡¡: .§. .. J Ê õi.2 'ü u.._ :>-000 s .;æ£c:ic:io a t! ~ "a .. >81 u ..- ~ >8£ u ~ . . '> ~ !>c81 ë U .. ~ Q <:I :2 ... N ~ >c g £ U c .2 Q¡ j. .c ~ .g .. ü 2: IJ) r;~~ ~ä~ IIU) --"i . "Oc'O ,!!'õO e <:)CL.=æ '- «« "'w ~~ ",>- .Q.Q '0'0 .. .. '0 E .~ ~ 0.'" '" '" nit; 00 "L ~ E Q 'ü '" to ~ po. ~ .. 0 Vi :> '" ..c: " W ~ Ü .:! J .! ~ J &. n .. . q & .ë ic3 Q,>o -g g . o · · ~ ã- ! fA ! ¡ ~ ': & ..2 ~ :!!: ~ ii \; ~ j ,g . E ~ ~ ~ -= ø ; ~~ ¡¡: ¡¡ .. o E 5 .r=Oft~O~ ~~ft.......... > .l: i-~o...... ~e."::"'~ >c . Ii._gggoo .-=ooo°"! I:!-~"~·'"' ~ =o·æ=o·šã õ 000 .. ~J õi¡¡:.§. .. ~ Ê õi¡¡:~ II:: i ~ ! 2 :: = ! ~ N :i œ ~~~~N ~¡~N<D_~~ t:";; C J 88fi¡:5~ .. '" .. CI) CI) (""J ..,. M "": ~ ~ ~ 6 ::,.... ~ c:i õ ~ 8 ~ to CI);;~~~ '" :>-00000 .;~!5.oocioo II - ~ ::I o rn . ~ ~ Š1 > ~ 8£ CJ > ~ Š1 >c ~ g £ U >c .!!! ãi .§ U ~ ~ ~ ~ IJ) ~ .!ë .!!!~'È gæ .!!! 'ii ~ 0 .: ãi U ü: U ..5 U c: .. U U .2 ë .5 ')( ')ë ëã ~ Õ g~¡=:ë « « « w U .. e · 2! Ialêll:!! ~.. N C'IIi N ~:c i w o JI ~ ;; ü ¡;¡ c: g ii '0 '" .. .. o (:I ::E '" .. Q CO CO 0 CO 0 0 CO ... ... 'l1l:I" ~ ..,. ..,. ~ OW' U') U") U"t II) \t'1 lot) tI') tJ") CD a) ex) co (I) co a:I CCI ,.... ,... ,.... ..... ,.... ,.... ,.... ,.... o a a a 0 0 0 0 ~ = ~ ~ ~ = ~ = o 0 0 0 0 00011:10 ...,¡ N N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ % 000 0 10 I:' 0 ø o 0 c:i 0 ci c:i 0 .:; " . .. 1ft "'" '" '" "'" - - - . - . . - II:: ~ ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i t:"'; C J .. ~..~ õi¡¡:.§. ..JÊ~~ õi£~ ~ fi¡ fi¡ 000 II) II) It) fi¡ fi¡ ...... ,.... ,.... ,.... ~ ,... ,.... ,... "'" ... ~ ... 'IIIZ' -.:r "'" ~ c:i c:i 0 c:i c:i c:i 0 c c '" '" CJI CJI 8 8 g g 0> '" '" . > ··c_oooooooo ~w 0 å å Ó 0 0 0 ó ~ §.§. ~ ~ g £ U > ~ Š1 >c ~ .. 8£ U >c .. III -= ~ ü c .2 t u II . C ~ ~ ; .i ü U fa . U .. ::I o U) III ~ 'It e '" C") ~ $ ;;; Ü (¡ ñi ëi c c c: ü: ¡¡: ü: "'" II c: ~ u :ä o .:. f/ CoO .. E ~ II CoO .. ~ 'g j iii ~ .. ii w 01 :2 III 2' I) U U ~ ~ .., .., u. u. ::E ::E ,! ,! .~ .~ .~ ¡ ~ ....I.; ~ ii ~ !!! g~ ~ <'" ~ .g c~ c B i ~.9 .= c 't: e - e .!U.Q 1II~u..1II !.::E~a..~i';:¡¡~ ..,!...~~ ,!~ II''; 3: 3: ~ ~ ''; 3: ~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~....I....I....I....I"......I....I .!!! _ãi CoOU ¡~ 11 ~~ ~ CO CI) 1i :2ë "'I!!:JIII .. CD ~.!! ~ oS 6 ! I'" ~.~'ë~u¡¡:u·i II!--....C:_II- CD .Q .!! .!l .Y ,g i ,2 ~ ~~ð~e~.2" Q~2;~<~~Ó£ '-' '-' c . I.L. " .õ i! =iñ 3.....;. g.i " ~ _0 ...: a > ~ ã ~ " 3'g .: .. .::. .. ~~ \Q,S ¡¡ .. " c .. i '" .. ::I " ê5 ... c :¡ N N -:.... N ü . .. 0 0 .. " N " " ] . .. " .. .. N .... on II .. . .. .. .. .. CD .. ! ca .. CD CD CD 'Õ " ~I .. N '" ~ .. N WI .. CD ..- .- 0 0 0 0 ." CD .... CD ." .,: ~ .. .. ë=- c:i .. ë=- on on on CD CD CD CD .... .... ..... .... .c o, a- m .! e- a a .. r: : ! ! ; :: ; ~ ê ! ! ! .. .!!:. .. ~ .. :;! ... . )( 6 · 1: · E_ .. :I .. 818 .. .. j= .. .. · ..- .. · $ :I '": · - : .. · .. .. 6- 'i .- ;! ~ ~ .. .. 'i . - .. ... .. .. a: :: a: :: ... ~ ~ !\ ;\ š :it ~ ~ ~ Šl š !! g := ::E w .. .. w .. .. 1/1 ~~ 0 .. 0 .. .. .. ,,:;: I . =1 '" '" . a: ~~ a: "' .. . a: I ~ w ~i .... i w 0 0 0 ~~ .Q .. CD 0 '" .... .., .... .., o .. a: :e ::ö a: a: - .. ~ on '" N N N N W .. .. w ~ CD :: N .... ~ 0 ~ ¡;¡ 0 on 0 00 t: "'; t: "'; 88 '" ~ 5! t: "'; .~ 5! 5! 0 .. N ~ .... c } c } c } .. ~ .. :8 N :e .. .... ..... .... ..... o, ..... .., o, .. .. .. .. ë 0"- e 0 on on on ë 0"- 0 c:i 0 '" ~.s .... '" ~.s '" 0 Õ N 8 CD .., . ê ~ § ~ 0 o, .... .. en o, 0> ë .. on .... M ë 0 en ~ ~ 2.- - > .. '70. ¡ ~ - > g II.! .. .. .. .. .. II .!! .. .. "! .. ... .. e iii .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... 0 IDYl ... "ü ID ID W 0 C <J <J ~ " ... ... 1 1 ~ ~ J > i .! :,... N E to to .. .. ~ ... u ... ci U U ~ > > " " " " > > ... Is 8 ~¡ "2 > 8 g 0 - g u u ~ <J · > > ~~ ~ C5 ü 1 ¡ !! ë:! ~ ~ .! ¡ i'" Ii · u u j ~g-a .! )( )( ~ À1~~à5 o, · I cLCLcLi cL :J ... " &.. Is 8 j ,1..........,.1.... =- on .. 0 =- g -> ~ ~ ~ f> 3: o :s u <J ~"~ ~~ :d~ . 0 )( )( !,! ~~~~~.~~ ~ë "8 ... 0 ~ :<J en ...>- - 1 ::! · . '" o ~ · 1!! 5 ! .. ~ " ~ õi .. r: · . u c: .. ,g .. o, · 0 .~ .... ...... :8 :: -! ... o, -!' ~ .,g o, .. u ..... .. .. u .. .. ::1- '3 .. > -'I c! 0 o, . ! .§: · u Q !<J .G .. N u .. Ii ü ! ~! t u. .0 ...: .r: ;t .... .CI ...... <J · · co i u::E ... o, .. · · :s¡ '¡ i¡J- .. 0 u U "N .... :0 .. .. CD ;... 0.0 ~ = = .~ !"f ~u. ! .en.. 0 0 ..... . en en . I! r "Hlil!ð · · 1s'g e S ~ e - ~ a.f::E o .. oJJ~w~~ Q o ~ ~ , ~ ~ II g :j ~ - "" :::¡ ~ ~ Òì ::::: :;.. - c.: ;I) ,f) ~ \IJ ~ ~ ~ ;7 t ." 'f ) 1 ~ II ~ Ø2 II "'i (5 ~ ~ 8 - , ~ ~ õ' ~ ø:; ~ '-' ZONE: AG-5 lAND USE: AGRICULTURE UNPlA TIED '7 I II 1'7 _D. III .. GIll" ~_D. II~ NOTIICWDO) PAIIŒ. ,...... . ... '11-"- ~ / > UNPlATTED "..... . .. _¡a / '/ / / '/ V. V V '/ V ,,~.- »17 111 _.-A ! = i ( r '/ ( .. I I p,.., . - _II / //'>1 ~/ / ,// //1 ////.%/>/.' 1 ~/ ':./'~/'<' ."./<' ,. / '/' ,/ / /<~j~ ~ / / // /~~ ,/ ~_D. J_ _ _II '/ ~, ,MIlL D NO. &II .. _II ~ PAIœ. . .... - - -.1\ IDB ~ii! ~ø -.D. ~ . .. ~ Ø7__~- ~ ~ ~.. r; i or: 8 Nt:! z '_D. § Ø7'" __IJ PIICJ'OSO) FIN: HYD. UIAI*G ÞII£A r WA1III IIAIN -.D. Ø7J1J1_.... ~ ~_D. - - -II II 1'7 It zo \! UNPLAT1£D NIt'4I'34" ZONE: AG-5 LAND USE: AGRICULTURE ,,.., D 110. ,~ (TCULPEPPER . -~=TERPENING.INC. srAII fII IOMID fJI f1EIJ) BK./pc. CCNSIA.1INC: DlQNEI115 . LNG suRllEYOllS .-a .-nM .... I1M:IT "'T NJIŒ. ~ )4MI (772) .....35:17 ~ .t111MCIIZA1ICIN NO. ..- ....... AGENDA REOUEST ...,.¡ ITEM NO.1 Date: January 6, 2004 Regular [X ] Public Hearing [ ] Consent [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Heather Young Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 03-19 - Animal Noise in AR-l Zoning Districts BACKGROUND: See C.A. No. 03-1895 FUNDS A V AIL. (State type & No. of transaction or N/A): N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests further direction from the Board with regard to Ordinance No. 03-19. ~ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Withdrawn E: COMMISSION ACTION: Dougla . Anderson County Administrator County Attorney: ~/ Coo rdina tion/Siena tu res Mgt. &B"dgcl~ ~ ""rnhê~:~ . . ~ Oter:·· ~ Originating Dept.: Finance (Check for Copy only, if applicable): DEC 3' i' '-' ......I INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 03-1895 DATE: December 29,2003 SUBJECT: Ordinance No. 03-19 - Animal Noise in AR-l Zoning Districts BACKGROUND: During its November 25, 2003 meeting, the Board of County Commissioners received a citizen complaint from Grady Fitzpatrick regarding barking dogs on property owned by Charlie Crooks. The subject property is zoned AR-l and the dogs are exempt from the noise limitations imposed on animal noise pursuant to Ordinance No. 03-19. Mr. Fitzpatrick indicated that the dogs were located at the home of Mr. Crooks' son. Mrs. Crooks addressed the Board in response and stated that the dogs would be moved. The Board directed staff to agenda the ordinance for further discussion on January 6, 2003. On December 2, 2003, Mr. Crooks appeared before the Board to report that the dogs in question had been relocated from his son's home. Karen Taylor, Animal Control Coordinator, had visited the property earlier that day and verified Mr. Crooks' statement. That same evening the County received an email from Mrs. Fitzpatrick indicating that the dogs had not been moved and the barking remained a problem. Ms. Taylor conducted a follow up visit to the property on December 22,2003, and determined that the dogs had not been returned to the site. The Animal Control Division has received no further complaints regarding the dogs since Mrs. Fitzpatrick's email. A copy of Ordinance No. 03-19 is attached for your reference. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff requests further direction from the Board with regard to Ordinance No. 03-19. Respectfully submitted, .~ ..It-. Heather Yo1fug Assistant County Attorney Attachment HY/ '-" """'" ~ Copies to: County Administrator Community Development Director Public Safety Director Deputy Clerk PressIPublic ~y fo:, Pvhl,¿'~~ i, ~ I V(\ð/ Úfrt ~¡)bllC (J.)ItG (rrt13 fin ~ '-" ...., ORDINANCE NO. 03-19 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CHAPTER 1-4, ANIMALS AND FOWL, OF THE ST. LUCIE COUNTY CODE OF ORDINANCES AND COMPILED LAWS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, BY AMENDING SECTION 1-4-16 ("DEFINITIONS") TO AMEND THE DEFINITION OF "PUBLIC NUISANCE" TO EXEMPT ANIMALS LOCATED ON PROPERTY ZONED AR-1 WITH AGRICULTURAL CLASSIFICATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 193.461, FLORIDA STATUTES; FURTHER AMENDING SECTION 1-4-16 ("DEFINITIONS") TO EXEMPT BIRDS AND LIVESTOCK LOCATED ON PROPERTY ZONED AR- 1; CREATING SUBSECTION 1-4-16 TO EXPRESSLY PROVIDE THAT NOTHING IN SECTION 1-4-16 SHALL BE INTERPRETED TO CONTRAVENE THE PROVISIONS OF THE FLORIDA RIGHT TO FARM ACT, SECTION 823.14, FLORIDA STATUTES; PROVIDING FOR CONFLICTING PROVISIONS, SEVERABILITY AND APPLICABILITY; PROVIDING FOR FILING WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF STATE; PROVIDING FOR AN EFFECTIVE DATE; PROVIDING FOR CODIFICATION. WHEREAS, Section 125.01, Florida Statutes, authorizes a board of county commissioners to adopt regulations which promote the health, safety, and welfare of the citizens of the county and to adopt ordinances necessary for the exercise of its powers in accordance with law; and, WHEREAS, Section 828.27, Florida Statutes, authorizes a boa,rd of county commissioners to enact ordinances regulating the possession, ownership, care, and custody of animals; and, St. à,k tll. ötlgh words are deleted; underlined words are added. 1 (J ~-j Q;u~1 at?;/ ::T.:1ï'1c:....¡ CD 1-" 0 n I-'::J:> OctJ:Z -, :z a :z IT1 CDS:: c-:3:I: .. c:r 0 octJr CD-'3: '''::J:> I'V :z CD ~ , 1',) o t...:l C':J LoJ CJ' r I--'-m -:J 7-1 I--'- U'I;:o::: .p- 0'. .. 0 I--'-Oï'1 0"'07-1 -f r:o ::I: om o :;:0<:; C':J 1-1 1--'-7-1 -J C':J CD c:: 0". 1-1 -f ïJ ::J:> C':J CJ)O 1"T1 c:: 7-1 I--'--f U'I (..,J I U'I OJ :r> 1-1 :z -f r c:: C':J 1-1 m C':J o c:: z: -f -< '-" ...,; í; WHEREAS, on August 25 , 1987, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 87-27 which established animal control regulations for the unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County; and, WHEREAS, on March 4, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners adopted Ordinance No. 03-10 which amended Section 1-4-17 (Public nuisance prohibited) to establish a time period beyond which animal noise will constitute a public nuisance; and, WHEREAS, in recognition of the animal noise which is generated by agriculture operations, Ordinance No. 03-10 also created an exemption under Section 1-4-17 for animals located on property zoned AG-l, AG-2.5, AG-5, or PUD where livestock is permitted, or property on which livestock is permitted as a nonconforming use; and, WHEREAS, it is appropriate to extend the exemption under Section 1-4-17 to animals located on property zoned AR -1 with agricultural classification pursuant to Section 193.461, Florida Statutes. NOW THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: PART A. CHAPTER 1-4, ANIMALS AND FOWL, OF THE CODE OF ORDINANCES AND COMPILED LAWS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, IS HEREBY Al\1ENDED BY THE DEFINITION OF "PUBLIC NUISANCE" IN SECTION 1-4-16 AS FOLLOWS: Section 1-4-16. Definitions. As used in this article, the following terms shall have the indicated meaning: Public nuisance. (1) Any animal which: a. Attacks passersby or passing vehicles without provocation; b. Attacks any other animal; c. Is repeatedly at large and not under restraint; d. Damages private or public property; St, d,k tiLl otlgh words are deleted; underlined words are added. 2 a ^' tI:1 a a ;:0:::: ~ -:J CD 0'. -0 ::D ü:J rrl ¡....-L U'1 LoJ 0"0 '-"" .-./ e. Repetitively barks, whines, howls, chirps, caws, or whistles for a period of five (5) minutes or more so as to disturb adjacent residents, except the following: .1. ôlAnimal.§...located on property zoned AG-1, AG-2.5, AG-5, AR-l with agricultural classification pursuant to Section 193.461. Florida Statutes. or PUD where livestock is permitted, 01" 2. Animals located on property on which livestock is permitted as a nonconforming use;, or ¿" Birds and livestock located on propertY zoned AR-l. f. Causes an annoyance in the neighborhood by acts such as overturning garbage cans, defecating, digging holes on other than its owner's property, or such other acts as are generally regarded to create an annoyance. (2) Any activity, such as, but not limited to, the feeding of wild animals or fowl which: a. Causes the fouling of the air by odor and thereby creates unreasonable annoyance or discomfort to those in close proximity to the premises where the animals or fowl congregate; or b. Causes a sanitary nuisance as defined in Section 386.01, Florida Statutes. (3) Nothing in this section shall be interpreted to contravene the provisions ofthe "Florida Right to Farm Act". Section 823.14. Florida Statutes. PARTB. CONFLICTING PROVISIONS Special acts of the Florida legislature applic,able only to unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, County ordinances and County resolutions, or parts thereof, in conflict with this ordinance are hereby superseded by this ordinance to the extent of such conflict. PART C. SEVERABILITY If any portion of this ordinance is for any reason held or declared to be unconstitutional, inoperative or void, such holding shall not affect the remaining portions St, d"k tlu otlgh words are deleted; underlined words are added. 3 o :::T.:1 tJ:I o o ::><:: ,...... -J CD CJ'". "'1:t ::I> Ci1 rrI ,...... LT1 c...J -J "" ..,,¡ '. of this ordinance. If this ordinance or any provision thereof shall be held to be inapplicable to any person, property or circumstances, such holding shall not affect its applicability to any other person, property or circumstances. PART D. APPLICABILITY OF ORDINANCE This ordinance shall be applicable in the unincorporated areas of St. Lucie County, Florida. PART E. FILING WITH DEPARTMENT OF STATE The Clerk be and hereby is directed forthwith to send a certified copy of this ordinance to the Bureau of Laws, Department of State, The Capitol, Tallahassee, Florida, 32304. PARTF. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect upon filing with the Department of State. PART G. ADOPTION After motion and second, the vote on this ordinance was as follows: Chairman Cliff Barnes AYE AYE Vice Chairrilan Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson AYE Commissioner John D. Bruhn NAY Commissioner Doug Coward NAY PART H. CODIFICATION Provisions of this ordinance shall be incorporated in the County Code and the word "ordinance" may be changed to "section", "article" or other appropriate word, and the sections of this ordinance may be renumbered or relettered to accomplish such intention; provided, however, that partsB to H shall not be codified. Stlu,k tlHough words are deleted; underlined words are added. 4 o :;;r.:1 r::c CJ o ;:0<:: I-'- -.::J CD 0'. -0 ::D G1 "T1 I-'- U'1 U CD v ~ PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this JJ!!.day of August, 2003. _.-}-,(·;:~tk: MISSIO~~~;'i..' ....j: ORIDA . \' ,)':' 1, 3, f. .r) .. ,', . - .t·~;¡.;·'·_,_ _ ".,,' _',..',~)/ lfi~~1 ~>!r~( ;i'~~~':'~:' ,,;'i .... ....,. !. r:' ,··,t··,·,,· ,)~, ,.'¿~,~.: .,. ':~dt 4~/l~j>: ., :,:.'t.\L··, -,' -~·'1>~::'~.\~"'l.:~ ·&,n"" -' é, . ~::<"~ '.'. ¡f'ti'¡~' :#~?'p~ ATTEST: ~ J]~- ~ DE TY CLERK . ;.~:¡;:2~'~~~·')~~'?·~'" , ,,",, 1 ~ r.t ........~ ....J..,'~ d~,. <:\.~;;:',,,.(c~:,:'~ ii,,' ;~,,' "'~"'1 ''\.;.~ l: ~":~ l __ ;i;-:;~''t. ,;'~~.;:~~ ~'o" ( ...:;;.~___..~,' ,:~.J. ~......,,~ ~":.)f ". ,<" .,.....j C"' I··..'· <, 'c' i... :""11' \'! ':::~ -,i.; '_t':.~ ~ ¡ \(~ .:;.)j\, : ">T ' \l ~~~ \ \....î ~.. : 'f~"'"i;. :~" ~ -;;':\'-' ¿if;;';, :\:~~""d" ,k ~: t.P>.. ,-.h' Ü(;II Vií". '.-' (,:v ,-f ~~: '~ i. ··..,....~~.4..:_>.~. \ .~,.~) ..~t lICJt: f'(;"'\\'~\ ,r/,;F ~~~~:~;;4~';~·~~:;;¡'· g:\atty\ordnance\2003\03-19. wpd BY: St, a.::k t1.... ough words are deleted; underlined words are added. 5 RNEY a :::0 ø o a :;:0:: ,..... -::J CD 0'. ï.:I ::D en I'T1 ,..... c.:n LoJ ..c ,.,.- 12/19/03 F'7.ABWARR FUND 001 001131 001142 001149 001157 001158 001286 001809 101 101002 101006 102 102001 102107 105 107 107001 107002 107003 107203 140 1001 J125 140325 142 160 183 183001 183004 183108 184203 185003 185004 185204 215 242 310003 315 316 362 401 401225 418 421 441 448 AJ1.9 'Ì "-" ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ..J WARRANT LIST #14- 13-DEC-2003 TO 19-DEC-2003 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund FTA Section 5303 Grant FY01 FTA Section 5303 Grant FY01/02 Section 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning 2004 CSBG Grant FY04 Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab 03/04 FDCA/EMPA 2004 SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Impact Fees Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU FDOT Bicycle/ped. Coordinator 03/04 Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper Child Dependency Court Representati Port & Airport Fund Port Fund FAA Noise Compatibility Study Updat Conduct Part 150 Study Port MSBU Development Fund Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court Domestic Relations Hearing Officer Ft. Pierce Beach Restoration FHFA SHIP FY02/03 FHFA SHIP FY03/04 FHFA SHIP 99/00 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds I&S Fund Port I&S Fund Impact Fees-Public Buildings County Building Fund County Capital Sports Complex Improv Fund Sanitary Landfill Fund FDEP Waste Tire Grant FY 04 Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities NHI Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund NHI Util - Capital Facilities Fund S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund {~ EXPENSES 664,060.48 7.97 9.98 567.57 1,966.94 107.65 770.54 111.46 94,812.71 1,647.24 35,165.89 7,489.80 509.10 117.94 2,225.86 394,762.92 76.34 611.04 30,039.46 2,400.00 13,197.07 35,053.26 11,610.95 1,290.11 28,786.03 911.49 1,348.40 97.23 590.63 6,632.50 5,967.14 67.83 158.66 0.46 83,499.00 220,251.27 29,200.75 144,261.62 140,586.96 780,211.76 159,791.29 1,128.25 15,476.57 19.90 358.44 42.23 32.94 416.43 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 547,293.26 92.73 92.70 6,144.48 1,436.72 1,261.54 0.00 1,261.54 120,568.97 0.00 0.00 51,535.91 5,730.64 1,366.19 2,400.69 96,689.81 879.62 879.62 0.00 0.00 11,873.33 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,666.40 5,053.69 1,171.85 1,970.41 0.00 0.00 753.55 1,770.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 45,105.55 0.00 21,885.64 243.48 3,171.01 494.04 394.89 1,006.44 .0 12/~9/03 F7~ABWARR FUND 458 461 471 478 479 481 489 491 505 505001 611 . . ~ ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ...." WARRANT LIST #14- 13-DEC-2003 TO 19-DEC-2003 FUND SUMMARY TITLE SH Uti I-Renewal & Replacement Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin No Cty Util Dist-Renewal & Replace No Cty Util Dist-Capital Facilities Airport Utilities District Airport Util - Capital Fac Fund Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund GRAND TOTAL: c ~ EXPENSES 13.55 201,052.77 4,336.21 26.90 41,857.05 1,903.20 13.53 6,141.13 279,763.69 2,532.41 422.74 3,456,513.24 PAGE 2 PAYROLL 543.06 10,492.22 3,506.18 329.36 410.76 0.00 164.12 40,334.75 10,376.40 0.00 4,945.61 1,006,297.51 ~.~ ~ ...., 12/19/03 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 1 F7,ABWARR VOID LIST# 14- 13-DEC-2003 TO 19-DEC-2003 to LIND : 140 - Port & Airport Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR TOTAL 00305510 12402752 Saez, Enrique 210.00 FUND TOTAL: 210.00 ~ f "" ....,J 12/19/03 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD P~ABWARR VOID LIST# 14- 13-DEC-2003 TO 19-DEC-2003 ruND: 401 - Sanitary Landfill Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR 00305435 12402449 Master Craft Aluminum Products PAGE 2 FUND TOTAL: TOTAL 1,998.00 1,998.00 ~ 12/26/03 F'7.ABWARR FUND 001 101 101002 101003 101006 101216 102 102001 107 113 114 116 117 119 123 127 128 129 136 140 160 _ -,001 183004 310002 316 316001 362 390 401 418 441 461 471 491 505 611 625 630 650 '-" ....¡ ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD WARRANT LIST #15- 20-DEC-2003 TO 26-DEC-2003 FUND SUMMARY TITLE EXPENSES General Fund Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option Transportation Trust/Impact Fees DEP River Park Baffle Box Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Fine & Forfeiture Fund Harmony Heights 3 Fund Harmony Heights 4 Fund Sunland Gardens Fund Sunrise Park Fund Holiday Pines Fund Queens Cove Lighting Dist#13 Fund Pine Hollow Street Lighting MSJru Kings Hwy Industrial Park Lighting Parks MSTU Fund Monte Carlo Lighting MSTU#4 Fund Port & Airport Fund Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court Impact Fees-Parks County Capital Transportation Capital Sports Complex Improv Fund Treasure Cove/Ocean Harbor S Cap Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Library Tax Deed Overbid Agency Fund Agency Fund 82,277.40 94,490.08 425.00 23,856.90 23,151.25 113,818.50 209.47 5,851.60 523.30 211.94 464.76 517.18 128.93 769.27 266.11 339.59 447.32 32,035.76 1,347.95 2.30 2.15 23.31 0.80 325.94 2,325.00 200.00 4,560.00 275.00 15,480.00 157,779.11 1,495.03 12.66 68.44 80.33 1,652.44 109,249.72 115.25 5.35 122.82 9,263.74 GRAND TOTAL: 684,171.70 'j( C PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 J 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 01/02/Ó4 FZABW.'\.."I{R FUND 001 001131 001142 001149 001157 001158 001162 001809 101 101002 101003 101006 102 102001 102107 103 105 107 107001 107002 107003 :1 " , 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 126 136 138 139 140 160 183 183001 183004 185002 185003 185004 205 , v ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ..,J WARRANT LIST #16- 27-DEC-2003 TO 02-JAN-2004 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund FTA Section 5303 Grant FY01 FTA Section 5303 Grant FY01/02 Section 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning 2004 CSBG Grant FY04 Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab 03/04 FDCA/FEMA Continuity of Operations SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option Transportation Trust/Impact Fees Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU FDOT Bicycle/Ped. Coordinator 03/04 Law Enforcement MSTU Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper River Park I Fund River Park II Fund Harmony Heights 3 Fund Harmony Heights 4 Fund Sheraton Plaza Fund Sunland Gardens Fund Sunrise Park Fund Paradise Park Fund Holiday Pines Fund The Grove Fund Blakely Subdivision Fund Indian River Estates Fund Queens Cove Lighting Dist#13 Fund Southern Oak Estates Lighting Monte Carlo Lighting MSTU#4 Fund Palm Lake Gardens MSTU Fund Palm Grove Fund Port & Airport Fund Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02 FHFA SHIP FY02/03 FHFA SHIP FY03/04 Beach Bond I&S Fund Port I&S Fund EXPENSES 431,741.21 20.66 34.37 1,451.55 2,586.07 280.32 23,750.00 282.97 81,863.85 19,490.00 3,249.54 500.00 20,801.40 11,795.97 305.10 6,270.06 654.26 472,995.77 196.91 2,764.19 21.50 142.49 27.40 10.66 25.73 17.29 25.13 6.54 39.90 36.23 9.13 4.23 45.14 13.54 6.02 63.86 6.47 36.26 7,462.96 639.16 7,681.16 701.84 1,325.74 584.55 109.92 447.92 3,661.07 1,127.61 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 505,858.51 92.70 92.73 5,807.23 1,436.78 1,261.54 0.00 1,261.54 119,947.29 0.00 0.00 0.00 49,518.65 5,109.17 1,366.19 0.00 2,085.12 114,311.92 879.62 879.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11,354.24 2,666.40 4,617.77 1,171.85 1,970.41 0.00 753.55 1,770.35 0.00 0.00 ? 01/02/04 FZABWARR FUND 282 315 316 316104 316201 382 396 401 418 421 441 448 449 451 458 461 471 478 479 489 491 t:"~--:: 001 611 625 '" ~ ..." ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD WARRANT LIST #16- 27-DEC-2003 TO 02-JAN-2004 FUND SUMMARY TITLE EXPENSES Environmental Land I&S Fund County Building Fund County Capital Pepper Park Dune Crossover FDEP/FRDAP Savanna Rec Phase II Environmental Land Capital Fund Lennard Road 1 - Roadway Capital Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities NHI Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund NHI Util - Capital Facilities Fund S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund SH Uti I-Renewal & Replacement Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin No Cty Util Dist-Renewal & Replace No Cty Util Dist-Capital Facilities Airport Util - Capital Fac Fund Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Library 6,793.81 2,665.00 2,000.00 216.55 112.22 1,813.65 605.02 175,145.51 12,322.01 38.41 2,135.40 104.82 85.73 3,069.19 2,624.78 5,576.15 4,499.88 60.80 101.69 34.73 33,559.00 976.78 144.87 1,418.88 35,054.31 GRAND TOTAL: 1,396,472.84 PAGE 2 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 2,934.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 48,777.34 23,934.36 113.08 2,981.68 461.41 461. 41 985.78 550.48 10,098.05 3,485.27 299.37 458.46 160.57 39,164.39 5,115.26 0.00 4,945.61 0.00 979,140.33 ~ '-' ..,,¡ 01/02(04 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD F7.ABWARR VOID LIST# 16- 27-DEC-2003 TO 02-JAN-2004 rul~: 102 - Unincorporated Services Fund CHECK INVOICE VENDOR 00306393 12404751 University Of Central Florida PAGE FUND TOTAL: TOTAL 4 7 0 ..00 470.00 ..... ~ AGENDA REOUEST .~ ITEM NO. C-2 DATE: January 6, 2004 REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING [ CONSENT [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: PUBLIC SAFETY PRESENTED BY: Jack Southard SUBJECT: Resolution 04-001 approving Emergency Management Services (EMS) Grant from the State of Florida Health Department. BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County Fire Dept. has filled out an application for the annual EMS Grant offered by the Bureau of Emergency Management at the State of Florida Department of Health. We anticipate to receive up to $136,901 in the Fiscal year 2003 - 2004. Section 4 of the application calls for a resolution from the Board of County Commissioners certifying the monies from the EMS County Grant will improve and expand the county's pre-hospital EMS system and that the grant monies will not be used to supplant existing county EMS budget allocations. FUNDS WILL BE A V AlLABLE: N/ A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Resolution 04-001, and authorize the Chairman to sign the application. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: ~] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 ~ Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: ~¿ Management & Budget: XX /),1 :C1~\'Y\~urchaSing: V Originating Dept: Public Works: Other: XX fI Fire 2¢'t Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX '-" ....., . RESOLUTION NO. 04-001 A RESOLUTION APPROVING THE STATE OF FLORIDA, DEPARThIENT OF HEALTH, BUREAU OF EMERGENCY lVIEDICAL SERVICES, 2003-2004 lVIERGENCY lVIEDICAL SERVICE COUNTY GR.At'iT APPLICATION A!~D AUTHORIZING THE CHAIR.vIAN TO EXECUTE AND SUBlVIIT THE APPLICATION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following detemrinations: 1. Pursuant to Section 40 1.31(4) and Section 420.113, Florida Statutes, the State of Florida has established an Emergency Medical Services Trust Fund consisting in part of a portion of each fme for every municipal and county moving violation and driving under the influence conviction. 2. Under Section 401.113, Florida Statutes, a portion of the funds deposited into the Emergency Medical Services Trust Fund by St. Lucie County from July 1, 2003 through and including June 30, 2004, and remaining funds from the 2002-2003 award, plus any interest earned will be used to fund pre-hospital emergency medical services in St. Lucie County. 3. The Board of County Commissioners may disburse funds dispensed to the County under Section 401.113, Florida Statutes, to theSt. Lucie County Fire District as a licensed emergency service provider operating in St. Lucie County. 4. The St. Lucie County Fire District has certified that the request is for an improvement or expansion of its pre-hospital emergency medical services. 5. Prior to any disbursements of funds from the Emergency Medical Trust Fund, the St. Lucie County Fire District will extend the Interlocal Agreement with St. Lucie County to ensure that the request will be funded and permitting the County to audit the use of funds disbursed under the grant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: 1. The attached Application for Funding County Emergency Medical Services (EMS) Award IS incorporated herein and made a part thereof. .. '-' ...., 2. The Board of County Commissioners certifies that the attached application is for an improvement or expansion of the pre-hospital emergency medical services system in St. Lucie County and that the funds requested will not be used to supplement the existing County emergency medical services budget allocation. 3. The St. Lucie County Fire District Fire Administrative Officer is hereby designated the "Authorized Contact Person" pursuant to the requirements of the Application. 4. The Chairman of the Board of County Commissioners is authorized to submit the application and a copy of this resolution to the Department of Health, Bureau of Office of Emergency Medical Services. After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner Paula A. Lewis, Chairperson xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX Commissioner Jo1m D. Bruhn, Vice Chairperson Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Cliff Barnes PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 6th day of January, 2004. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY CO)!MISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRPERSON APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORi"I AND CORRECTNESS: COUl'lTY ATTORi~EY .: .' '-' ...., EMS COUNTY GRANT ApPLlCA TION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEAL TH Bureau of Emergency Medical Services Complete all items ID. Code (The State Bureau of EMS will assign the ID Code - leave this blank) C 1. County Name: ST. LUCIE Business Address: 2300 Rhode Island Avenue Fort Pierce. FL 34982 Telephone: 772-462-1400 Federal Tax 10 Number (Nine Diqit Number). VF 5 9 6 0 0 0 8 3 5 2. Certification: (The applicant signatory who has authority to sign contracts, grants. and other legal documents for the county) I certify that all information and data in this EMS county grant application and its attachments are true and correct. My signature acknowledges and assures that the County shall comply fully with the conditions outlined in the Florida EMS County Grant Application. SiQnature: Date: Printed Name: Paula Lewis Position Title: Chair - BOCC 3. Contact Person: (The individual with direct knowledge of the project on a day-to-day basis and has responsibility for the implementation of the grant activities. This person is authorized to sign project reports and may request project changes. The signer and the contact person may be the same.) Name: Capt. Nate Spera, MFA Position Title: Fire Administrative Officer Address: 2400 Rhode Island Avenue Fort Pierce. FL 34950 Telephone: 772-462-8371 T Fax Number: 772-462-8486 E-mail Address: nS'Deracaslcfd.orlZ 4. Resolution: Attach a current resolution from the Board of County Commissioners certifying the grant funds will improve and expand the county pre-hospital EMS system and will not be used to supplant current levels of county expenditures. 5. Budget: Complete a budget page(s) for each organization to which you shall provide funds. list the organization(s) below. (Use additional pages if necessary) <::+- T,,,,,,,; 0 ... k';,..o rH cd-,..;,...+- DH Form 1684, Rev. June 2002 3 '-' """'" BUDGET PAGE A. Salaries and Benefits: For each position title, provide the amount of salary per hour, FICA per hour, other fringe benefits, and the total number of hours. Amount TOTAL Salaries TOTAL FICA Grand total Salaries and FICA B. Expenses: These are travel costs and the usual, ordinary, and incidental expenditures by an agency, such as, commodities and supplies of a consumable nature excludinq expenditures classified as operatinq capital outlav (see next cateaorv). List the item and, if applicable, the quantity Amount TOTAL $ C. Vehicles, equipment, and other operating capital outlay means equipment, fixtures, and other tangible personal property of a non consumable and non expendable nature with a normal expected life of one 1 ear or more. List the item and, if applicable, the quantity Amount TOTAL $ Less Fire Distric Grand Total S 136,901 DH Form 1684, Rev. June 2002 4 ~ """" FLORmADEPARTMENTOFH~Lffl EMS GRANT PROGRAM REQUEST FOR GRANT FUND DISTRIBUTION In accordance with the provisions of Section 401.113(2)(a), F. S., the undersigned hereby requests an EMS grant fund distribution for the improvement and expansion of pre-hospital EMS. DOH Remit Payment To: Name of Agency: Mailing Address: St. Lucie County Board of County Co~issioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Federal Identification number 596000835 Authorized Official: Signature Date '" Paula Lewis, Chair BOCC Type Name and Title Sign and return this page with your application to: Florida Department of Health BEMS Grant Program 4052 Bald Cypress Way, Bin C18 TaHahassee, Florida 32399-1738 Do not write below this line. For use by Bureau of Emergency Medical Services personnel only - Grant Amount For State To Pay: $ Grant 10: Code: Approved By Signature of EMS Grant Officer Date State Fiscal Year: - Orqanization Code 64-25-60-00-000 E.O. N OCA N2000 Object Code 7 Federal Tax 10: VF --------- Grant Beginning Date: October 1, Grant Ending Date: September 30, DH Form 1767P, Rev. June 2002 5 ..... Q) ü 0) ï:: "'0 ..... :::::I U'JCO 0..... Q) c: s.... ~ LL(9 ~CJ) c:~ ~w U~ Q) c: .- :::::I Ü 0 30 .....-.;:t CJ)O o C\I '-" ..., - I'-- U E.r=. LO LO .!Q u 0:) aêa C"') <1>~ .!::: u.. ~ ~ 0 LO 0 0 LO 0 I'-- N N N 0 en I'-- Irn co ~ 0 ~ N C"') C"') 0- LO 0 'V 'V N a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .r=. ~ u « « « « « « - 0 co LO Z Z Z Z Z Z ~ I'-- co 0 I() I() N N "=t c.o N ~ M ..... - "=t~ ~ u- 0 c.o <1>'s I() ~ '--' a ~ 21- a.. ~ ~ ~ ~ 0:) 0 LO 0 0 LO LO N N I'-- ~ 0 en 0:) co N ~ LO ~ C"') ~ W -.:t 0 -.:t ~ <1> LO ~ U ~ .¡:: a.. ~ ~ tA- tA- tA- tA- tA- C co ~ ~ I'-- N N ~ N :::::I ~ a - 0 ~ ~ <1> a 0 0 a. ~ 0 0 >- -.:t 0:) I- W LO 0 co ....J C ... a (]) :;:; c ro c ü a 'æ ....J ... >- (]) I- .c (f') ro E ë3 ....J a:1 (]) .r=. en Ü (f) - (]) - (]) en en « ....J > E "C (]) Ü ü a c (]) « :;:; (]) a a "C ro I I .r=. a ro E 0 a. ü - - a ro "C a Ü g g ... g. ... - ü (]) :::::I a.. co « « u.. LL ~ ~ ....J I'-- LO LO 0:) C"') tA- ~ o en co C"') ~ tA- 0:) LO -.:t LO I'-- ~ tA- " -- ...." 2003-2004 FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, COUNTY EMS GRANT EXPLAi~ATION OF PROPOSED EXPENDITURES Project: Automatic Vehicle Locating System (A VL). Vendor: Various Need: The St. Lucie County Fire District has pursued substantial developments within its communications system in the last four years. These developments include: activation of an 800mhz radio system, upgraded Computer Assisted Dispatch Programs (CAD), and implementation of a nationally recognized Emergency Medical Dispatch program. Since our 800mhz. radio system is divided into several talk groups, dispatchers and field units do not always know where units are in relation to one another. Currently, emergency units regularly pass one another enroute to calls for service. This system will identify and recommend the closest unit to an emergency. We believe that this enhancement (A VL) is an important connection in a communications system dedicated to precise data collection, accurate dissemination of pre-arrival instruction to patients, and response time reduction through the appropriate allocation of resources to emergencies. The St. Lucie County Fire District will provide a 25% match to the state's funding for this project. A VL will greatly enhance our response to medical emergencies. By design, when a call for emergency services is received by a "call taker" and placed on our Computer Assisted Dispatch system (CAD), the nearest available ambulance and first response unit will be identified through a Global Infonnation System based (GIS) tracking system. The system will automatically recommend units to our dispatchers based on the unit's proximity to the call. Our dispatchers will then send units to the call based on the recommendation of the A VL system and our standard operating guidelines. This system will reduce response times, as there will be no conjecture regarding the closest unit to the emergency call. These systems have proven themselves in the private sector and in numerous public safety agencies around the country. A collateral benefit of the systems ability to locate any unit at any time is the reduction of the potential of theft of emergency units. We believe that this system is a vital connecting link between field units and our dispatchers. Project: Emergency Medical Dispatch (EMD) software. Vendor: Assoc. of Public Safety Communications Officials (APCO) Need: In 2003 the St. Lucie County Fire District implemented an emergency medical dispatch card system in St. Lucie County. Fire District telecommunicators now utilize this system to assess & categorize emergency medical calls, prioritize, assign, and dispatch resources, and give pre-arrival instructions to callers for emergency medical related calls. This system has already proven itself with several lives saved. This project would move the system from a "flip card" based system to one that is operated from computer terminals and is integrated in to our Computer Aided Dispatch · ~ ' , ~ ''WI (CAD) software. This system will further reduce the time it takes to categorize calls and assign units to medical emergencies. Furthennore, it would provide a more advanced manner in which our telecommunicators access EMD related materials and infonnation. The largest enhancement this program will give to our EMD administration is improved delivery of pre arrival medical infonnation such as basic fIrst aid and CPR instructions. Project: Flight Safety Gear for Medivac Paramedics. Vendor: Various Need: In 2002 the St. Lucie County Fire District implemented a Medivac transportation system in partnership with the St. Lucie County Sheriffs offIce. This partnership staffs a 2.4 million dollar Medivac helicopter with a paramedic and a pilot, 24 hour a day, 7 days a week. The Fire District's paramedics assigned to the unit are in need of helmets for their safety and flight hoods to ensure the durability of the helmets. Numerous safety and flight medic associations support the wearing of A1,\¡,SI certifIed headgear for all personnel regularly assigned as flight medics. Also included in this item are 2 microphones used during transports to communicate with area hospitals and on board the aircraft. Project: ACLS Training Mannequins. Vendor: Laerdal Need: This coming year we are required to deliver ACLS instruction to all of the District's 104 paramedics, and State mandated recertifIcation to all of the 300+ Emergency Medical Technicians and Paramedics. These classes are greatly enhanced by "hands on" training. We have found that anatomical mannequins are a great enhancement to the training we will be providing to our fIrst responders and advanced life support providers. These mannequins have proven to be of great benefIt to our employees as they progress through their training at the local community college. Unfortunately those mannequins are no always available to us. This project will purchase two "baby" and one adult "mega code" mannequins for use in training and recertifying our EMT's and Paramedics. They will also be incorporated into regular training of our responders from apprentice Paramedics through practicing fIeld medics and flight medics. \.-- ...¡ AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. c-3 A DATE: Jan. 6, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: DON MCLAM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CENTRAL SERVICES SUBJECT: BID WAIVER AND SOLE SOURCE DECLARATION TO SIEMENS BUILDING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. FOR CENTRAL SERVICES AlC DEPARTMENTI ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM UPGRADE TO APOGEE SYSTEMS BACKGROUND: The AlC Division of Central Services has utilized the System 600 Energy Management System, since early 1990's, through Siemens Building Technologies for temperature control in nine county facilities; a final revision on this system was made on this product in 1999. Now with the development of the APOGEE System and non-orderable and unavailability of the component parts for the System 600 (currently in use) this product will be retired and replaced by APOGEE. Siemens designs, develops and manufactures the APOGEE System; APOGEE is only sold and supported through factory-owned offices of Siemens Building Technologies. (PLEASE SEE ATTACHED LETTER) Siemens has served St. Lucie County with the System 600 Energy Management System for over ten years and staff feels it would benefit St. Lucie County to continue our partnership with them on implementation of the APOGEE System at a cost of $40,000.00. FUNDS AVAIL: 001-1929-564000-100 (Machinery & Equipment) PREVIOUS ACTION: Board approved Equipment Request #EQ04-039. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the bid waiver and sole source declaration to Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. for the APOGEE Energy Management Systems Upgrade at a cost of $40,000.00. MISSION ACTION: be] APPROVED [] DENIED r1 OTHER: Approved 5-0 NCE: Other: Do nderson County Administrator 2-1/ vPurchaSing Mgr.: ~ í Other: County Attorney: Originating Dept: --p M. ~ vMgt. & Budget. Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eft. 1/97 H:\AGENDA\AGENDA-AC APOGEE.DOC ... ~ JUSTIFICATION ...", Ra SOLE SOURCE PROCUREMENT Based upon the Purcl"lI~g ManuaJ, the proposed procurement described below is beiug pI'-u.n.d pursuant to the gt)jrl,.1ines on Sole Source Procurement. A good faith review of available soU&~ has been made and there is only one source for the required supply, service, or construction item. 1. Propose to procure System 600 Energy Management System utilized be upgraded to the APOGEE Energy Management System. Requisition # 2. & a sole source procurement from: Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. 3. The basis for this sole source" determination and the reason no other vendor is suitable is: The S stem 600 Ener y Management System currently utilized by the A/C Dept. received: a final revision in 1999 making component parts non- rderable and unavailable and will be re APOGEE. Siemens designs, develo sand manufactors the APOGEE System. APOGEE is only sold and su orted through factory owned offices of Siemens Building Technologies. 12-29-2003 Date " Central Services lAIC Department/Division - ~~ \$>~ Authorized Signature Department ~ '2-/ ,q Ie '~ , Assistant Director Title NOTE: 1. Eater dcsaiptiOD or ¡oods or scrvia:s to be procured. 2. Eater Dame or sole source COI1trador'. J. Eater the determiDatiaa and bais tor sole JOW'œ procuremCDL 4. Attach sole source letter from YCDdor and departlDCDL 5. PropouJ from YeDdor with priciD¡. ~Approved ( )Disapproved ¿;¡& Purchasing Director L-. /~o;6~ Date ./ No$ 06 ~_ J.1:231: S:e~e~s BU1_dlng Tech Inc ~72 223 ,1~C p.2 ~ ~ - . - :-;-' -- ~- " )..;'ovember 7. 2003 '.... - - --- - Robert Ettswold - Superintendent of Air Conditioning St. Lucie County Government Central Services 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 SUBJECT: Energy Management System Upgrade Dear Mr. Ettswold, Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. is pleased to present a proposal to upgrade your existing System 600 energy management systems to APOGEE. APOGEE is our next generation of System 600 that replaces your Insight 2.8 that has been officially retired (with its last revision released in 1999). Below is an excerpt from our official internal announcement of the product retirement ïhe Insight for Personal Computers 2.x software product has been available since the early-1990s. During its lifetime, it evolved over several revisions. until its final revision. Revision 2.8. which was announced in May 1999. Now with the maturing of the APOGEE System & the unavailability of the component parts of the Insight PC 2.x product, the availability of the final revision of the Insight for Personal Computers software (2.8) is discontinued -- it is time to retire this product. Effective July 1, 2001, all part numbers for Insight for Personal Computers software. including part numbers for adds and upgrades, will no longer be orderabJe or available .. The APOGEE product line incorporates over 20 years of experience and features as well as new enhancements that were made to the system. This venture was a complete re-design of the System 600 [rom the Building Level Network to the graphical workstation. APOGEE is our platform for the Year 2000 and beyond. Best of all, it is compatible with your existing System 600 energy management systems in nine (9) facilities plus two new systems currently being installed at the St. Lucie County Sports Complex (Mets Stadium) and the Walton Road Annex. Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. designs, develops, and manufacturers the APOGEE system. APOGEE is only sold and supported through factory-owned offices of Siemens Building Technologies. No other third-party companies or distributors are authorized to service or install Our APOGEE systems. There are approximately 120 Siemens Building Technologies factory-owned offices in the U.S., with the Palm City office in northern MartÍn County specifical1y assigned to serve and provide technical assistance to 81. Lucie County and the surrounding areas. Siemens is the only controls company to have a pennanent office within 50 miles ofSt. Lucie County and we have twenty-five local, factory-trained employees ready to serve your staff. Some of the benefits of upgrading your facilities to APOGEE include: 0' County Wide Networking - Ethernet Connectivity from Central Services Workstation to Buildings (instead of dial-up telephone) - Remote Access to System with Laptop and Client Software - Web Browser Access to System Points & Graphics (with APOGEE Go option) - Remote Critical Alarm Notification via Email or Pager (with RENO option) Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. 2969 sw 42nd Ave. Palm City, FL 34990 Tel: (772) 223.8222 Fax: (772) 223-7130 Nov OS C3 04:23p '-' Sleme~s Buildin~ Tech Inc 772 223 7'~O ...., p.3 November 7,2003 o Runs Under Windows 2000 and XP - Multiple Applications Active - Networking Capabilities - Drag and Drop User Interface ø Improved System Security and Access Management - System Activity Reports (logon, commands, database edits) - Configurable User Access Privileges - Over 200 User Accounts Available at Insight - 50 User Accounts at the Panel Level o Full Length Point Names - Up to 30 Character Names ø Year in Advance Scheduling of Equipment - Maximizes Efficiency and Energy Savings ø Dynamic Trend Plotter - Up to 10 points Per Graph - Simultaneous Viewing of Graphs Siemens Building Technologies is very proud of Our relationships with federal, state and local government facilities all across the country. We have partnerships with many governments in the State of Florida including the following local customers served by the Palm City office: Palm Beach County, S1. Lucie School Board, Okeechobee County. Martin County School Board. and Indian River County. There are several preferred pricing programs in place with the State of Florida that are available to local municipalities inc1uding SNAPS (Statewide Negotiated Agreement Price Schedule) and the Area VII Mechanical Services Construction Management agreement. In addition, Siemens Building Technologies has a GSA Supply Schedule in place with the Federal Government. We value the S1. Lucie County Government's business, and look forward to continuing our partnership by sharing our latest technological advancements with your staff. Please call me at 772-223-8222, ex1. 24 with any questions. Thank you for the opportunity. Respectfully, §f.I'1E~~itRI.r;>~t1ìHNOLOGIES, mc Jra~~ Account ~ve Nov 06 03 04:23~ """ SIEMENS Sleme~s Buildln~ Tech I~c 772 223 7~~ .."" 10·4 Proposal St. Lucie County Government Attn. Bob Ettswold Central Services Fort Pierce. Fl 34982 No.: 296-N-0563 Date: 08114/03 Project: Proposal: Energy Management System Upgrade - Nine (9) Facilities Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. proposes to upgrade the existing energy management control systems at the following faciljties to APOGEE. The Building level Networks (BLNs) at each of the nine (9) sites will be connected to the new APOGEE Server at the Central Services office via the County's v.;de area network. County Administration, County Correction, County Courthouse, Main library, Public Defender, Sheriffs Office, South Annex, State Attorney, Public Health. 'ncluded: New APOGEE Workstation Server with Flat Screen Monitor and Pñnter APOGEE Advanced Server Software and One Client Software 9 MBC (Pre-APOGEE) Memory Board Upgrades 9 MBC (APOGEE Ready) Firmware Upgrades 3 SCU Firmware Upgrades 9 APOGEE Ethernet MicroServers (AEMs) Address Keys and Point Module Labets Engineering and Installation (all worX duñng normal business hours) Graphics, TO Os, and Database Conversion 32 Hours Training Net Price: $ 39,850 Thirty-nine thoosand eight hundred fifty DOLlARS Remarks: 1. This proposal 0 does 181 does not include control ....,;ñng. 2. This proposal 0 does 181 does not include the installation of valves and dampers. 3. The following Options are available at time of this proposal: RENO (Remote Notification) - $2,750 APOGEE GO (5 Ucense) - $7,250 4. Other exclusions and differences: Customer is responsible for Ethernet wiring to panels. addressing. and setup for TCPIIP network:. TCUs at County Courthouse will not have full feature set of APOGEE. Proposal Accepted: Siemens Building Technologies, Inc. is authorized to proceed with the work as Proposed. The T enns and Conditions of Sale shown on the attached are a part hereof Proposal Submitted: Siemens Building Technologies, Inc., Landis Branch NetworX Purchaser Seller 296 - Palm City Branch By By Bradley L. Ayres TitJe Title Sales Engineer Date Date 08114/03 This Proposal is valid for 30 clays Page 1 of 2 .~ ,,t¡' AGENDA REQUEST ...", ITEM NO. 3-b .",., DATE: Jan. 6. 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT[x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: DON MCLAM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CENTRAL SERVICES SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER NO.3 TO CONTRACT NO. C01-09-590 TECO ENERGY SERVICES: AMEND SCOPE OF WORK FOR ADMINISTRATIVE COMPLEX TO OMIT INSTALLATION OF ENERGY MANAGEMENT SERVICES CONTROLS FOR ROOF TOP A/C UNITS SERVING THE CIVIC AUDITORIUM. BACKGROUND: Through Board approval St. Lucie County entered into contract with TECO Energy Services on September 25, 2001 for retrofit installation of energy efficiency equipment. With the elimination of energy efficient equipment supporting the Civic Center, scope of work scheduled by TECO for this location was changed bringing about a decrease in the contract sum in the amount of $32,396.00, please see attached ESCO SCOPE OF WORK CHANGE NOTICE. FUNDS AVAIL: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners approved Amendment to Contract No. C01- 09-590 on May 14, 2002, Item No. C-10. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Change Order No.3 to Contract No. C01-09-590 with TECO Energy Systems to reduce the contract sum by $32,396.00 and authorization for the Chairman to sign the Change Order. MISSION ACTION: [~ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 D g Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: -n Originating Dept: ~lA-1 ~J ~ ~ Mgt. & Budget: / / Purchasing Mgr.: G/P Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Eft. 1/97 H:\AGENDA\AGENDA REQUEST FORM.WPD ... CHANGE ORDE!L....:. ST. LUCIE COUN"P"'Y PROJECT: CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 3 (name, address) Energy Management Services Agreement INITIATION DATE: December 15, 2003 f TO (Contractor): TECO Energy Services, Inc. 3550 W. Water Ave. Tampa, Fl. 33614 ..", CONSULTANTS PROJECT NO.: ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONTRACT NO: COI-09-590 CONTRACT DATE: You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: (Additional sheet attached as Exhibit A - Yes No) 9-25-2001 Please see attached ESCO SCOPE OF WORK CHANGE NOTICE. The original (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) was .......................... $3,346,658.87 Net change by previous authorized Change orders ..................................... $ The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) prior to this Change Order was ....... $ The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) will be (~H (decreased or changed) by this Change Order ....................................................... The new (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) including this Change Order will be The Contract Time will be (i!Nljt~) (Qü~~) (unchanged) by The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is: Funds Available: Account Number $ 32,396.00 $3,314,262.87 ( ) Days .. June 25, 2003 The adjustment in Contract Price and/or Contract Time stated in this Change Order shall comprise the total price and/or time adjustment due or owed the Contractor for the work or changes definèd in this Change Order. By executing this Change Order, the Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the stipulated price and/or time adjustments include the costs and delays for all work contained in the Change Order, including costs and delays associated with the interruption of schedules. extended overheads. delay, and cumulative impacts or ripple effect on all other non-affected work under this Contract. Signing of the Change Order constitutes full and mutual accord and satisfaction for the adjustment in contract price or time as a result of increases or decreases in costs and time of performance caused directly and indirectly from the Change Order, subject to the current scope of theentire work as set forth in the Contract Documents. Acceptance of this waiver constitutes an agreement between the County and Contractor that the Change Order represents an equitable adjustment to the Contract, and that Contractor will waive all rights to file a claim on this Change Order after it is properly executed. All work performéd under this Change Order shall be performed in accordance with the contract specifications. Recommended: Approved: Architect/Engineer Address By Agreed To: Date Contractor Address By Date CANARY-DEPARTMENT WHITE - VENDOR r.pnrr~l Sprvir.p~ St. Lucie County Department 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pieree, Fl. ~ess . ~ I&..AL,_~ By Authorized: St. Lucie County: 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 12-15-03 Date By Approved as to Form and Correctness Date County Attorney PINK - PURCHASING GOLDENROD _ FINANCE -.. "-' .." ST. LUCIE COUNTY ESCO SCOPE OF WORK CHANGE NOTICE Notice No. 2 Project Name: Energy Management Services Agreement Description: Retrofit Installation of Energy Efficiency Equipment ESCO Contractor: TECO Energy Services, Inc. Address: 3550 W. Water Ave.. Tampa, FL 33614 Description of Change: AMEND the Scope of Work for Administrative Complex ECM #3 Night Setback originally described in Technical Audit and Design Document dated 18 September 2000, CHANGE Delete installation of EMS controls scope of work for the package rooftop DX Air Conditioning units serving the Civic Auditorium. ENERGY IMPACT Energy Savings Guarantee will be reduced: Original Annual Guarantee Guarantee Amount Reduction New Annual Guarantee Amount $75,408.00 $ 9.945.57 $65,462.43 RATIONAL The Civic Center is proposed for demolition which includes all controls equipment supporting the building.. CONTRACT TIME Contract Completion Date: Notice No. 1 Notice No.2 June 25th, 2003 Sept. 25, 2002 June 25th, 2003 CONTRACT SUM -Original Construction Sum :$ 3.346.658.87 -No Change this order -Contract Sum Reduction this orderS 32.396.00 This Change Add: + 0 days Substantial Completion Date: June 25th, 2003 -New Contract Amount $ 3.314.262.87 This Change Order is an amendment to the Energy Management Service Contract Agreement between Contractor and the Owner and all Contract provisions shall apply unless specifically exempted. The amount and time change designated are the maximum agreed to both the Owner and Contractor for this change. In consideration of the foregoing adjustments in Contract Name and Contract Sum, the Contractor hereby releases Owner from all claims, demands or causes of action arising out of the transactions, events and occurrences giving rise to this Change Order. This written Change Order is the entire agreement between Owner and Contractor with respect to this Change Order. No other agreements or modifications shall apply to this contract amendment unless expressly provided herein. This Change Order represents final action relating to this Change Order. RECOMMENDED: ST. LUCIE COUNTY AGREED: TECO ENERGY SERVICES, INC G2~,,- ~ Signature ~~~~- Signature Director of Facilities Services Peter J. Bryon General Manager "' " '-" """'" MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT made and entered into this day of 2004, by and between K. D. Construction of Florida, Inc. (the "Developer") and ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (the "County"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Developer intends to construct a portion of Prima Vista Boulevard Extension (the "Improvements") and convey ownership and maintenance responsibility to the County; and WHEREAS, as a condition for the acceptance of the Improvements by the County, the Developer has agreed to post security in a form acceptable to the County Attorney in the amount of fifteen percent (15%) of the approved cost of the Improvements for a period of at least three (3) years from the date of conditional acceptance of the Improvements by the County. NOW, THERFORE, in consideration of the agreement, premises, and covenants set forth herein and other good and valuable consideration, the parties agree as follows: 1. SECURITY. The Developer agrees to provide the County with security in a form acceptable to the County Attorney in the amount of Twenty six thousand nine hundred thirty eight and four cents (26,938.04), representing fifteen percent (15%) of the cost of the Improvements as submitted by the Developer's engineer and approved by the County Engineer and as are more particularly set forth on those certain plans for construction improvements drawn by the Developer's engineers, Culpepper and Terpening, Inc., dated September 9, 2003. This amount shall be retained for a period of three (3) years from the date of conditional acceptance as described below to provide for maintenance of the Improvements to be dedicated to the public and to indemnify and save the County harmless i' from any and all costs necessary to repair or replace any part or portion of the Improvements occasioned by faulty engineering, workmanship or materials. 2. SUPERVISION OF CONSTRUCTION. The Improvements shall be constructed under the supervision of the Developer's engineer in full compliance with the specifications and requirements of St. Lucie County, and when complete, Developer's engineer shall furnish the County Engineer with a certificate of satisfactory completion for approval. 3. CONDITIONAL ACCEPTANCE. Upon completion of the construction of the Improvements, the Developer's engineer shall certify that the Improvements have been constructed in accordance with applicable County requirements. When the Improvements have been certified by the Developer's engineer, the County Engineer shall, inspect the '-' ...." ;, improvements and review the construction and supporting test/control data furnished by the Developer's engineer. If all required improvements are completed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer, the County Engineer shall confirm this in writing to the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners and recommend that the Improvements be conditionally accepted. 4. RELEASE OF SECURllY. Two years and nine months from the date the Improvements are conditionally accepted by the Board of County Commissioners, the Developer shall contact the County Engineer for a joint inspection with the Developer's Engineer. If deficiencies appear, the Developer shall correct all deficiencies in an approved manner f-except those damages that are not a result of design or construction deficiencies. If the required corrective action cannot be completed by the three year expiration date, the County may so notice the Developer that the required security will not be released until all necessary corrective actions have been completed and approved by the County. When all corrections have been made, the County Engineer shall so inform the Board. The Board of County Commissioners shall then act on release of remaining development security, and final acceptance of the Improvements. 5. INTERPRETATION: VENUE. This Agr~ement constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and supersedes all prior verbal or written agreements between the parties with respect thereto. This Agreement may only be amended by written document, properly authorized, executed and delivered by both parties hereto. This Agreement shall be interpreted as a whole unit and section headings are for convenience only. All interpretations shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Agreement, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial circuit for St. Lucie County, Florida, for claims under state law and the Southern District of Florida for any claims which are justiciable in federal court. (THE NEXT PAGE IS THE SIGNATURE PAGE) . . ~ ..." IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this agreement to be made and entered into the day and year first written. WITNESSES: K. D. Construction of Florida, Inc. BY: ~ Pri nt: Title: ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNlY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNlY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUlY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: .<, i . COUNlY ATTORNEY MaintAgrmt-KDConst.doc ~ ...." AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO: C-4 DATE: Jan 6, 2004 REGULAR PUBLIC HEARING CONSENT X] TO: SAINT LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks and Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh SUBJECT: RELEASE OF RETAINAGE TO JIM WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION INC & FINAL PAYMENT BACKGROUND: On 21 January 2003, the Board approved the construction of the Fairgrounds maintenance building by Jim Wright Construction Inc. Final inspection of the building (permit# 23040680) was approved on November 26, 2003. Staff is requesting approval to make the final payment in the amount of $8,296 to Jim Wright Construction, Inc. PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board awarded bid #03-012 in the amount of $82,960 to Jim Wright Construction, Inc. FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN: 310002-000-205100-7655 (General Ledger - Retainage) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval to make the final payment and release the retainage of $8,296 to Jim Wright Construction Inc. COMMISSION ACTION: X ] APPROVED [] DENIED ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 Coordination/Signatures County Attorney' ~ Management & Budget, Purchasing, Originating Dept: '. Other: Finance :'¡'~ (if applicable) 0« I~ tj¡ f- r',1 \ ",_,,,, \.' {\"> "1'1 fl' f"\ 1 "" Irtr')f"'\l'lr"\<, f'lr."l" " 1'-' A rr. T'\f"'Ir' --- '-" .., 5 Agenda Request Item Number: Meeting Date: Jan 6, 2004 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [X ] [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development SUBJECT: Request of St. Andrews Park Inc., the developers of the St. Andrews Park ixed use commerciaVresidential development in the City of Port St. Lucie, for a Road Impact Fee Credit Agreement associated with the construction of Selvitz Road from Peachtree Boulevard to Parkway Elementary School. BACKGROUND: The developers of the St. Andrews Park mixed use commercial/residential development in Port St. Lucie are requesting that the County consider granting them a Road Impact Fee Credit for the value of the cost to construct the "missing" segment of Selvitz Road in the City of Port St. Lucie from Peachtree Boulevard to Parkway Elementary School. The requirement for the construction of this roadway segment was imposed by the City of Port St. Lucie as part of the basic development plan approvals for the St. Andrews Park project. Section 1-17-33.1 of the St. Lucie County Code and Complied Laws provides for a process whereby the County may consider the granting of Road Impact Fee Credits for work the meet certain minimum standards. Specifically, in the case of Selvitz Road, the "missing" segment is recognized as part of the overall transportation and circulation needs for the community and is considered to be a part of the Impact Fee Eligibility Network, thus a Road Impact Fee Credit may be considered on this property. Attached are copies of the submitted costs for the construction of this project. County staff has reviewed these submitted figures and determined that they appear to be within accepted standards and has no objection or concern over the figures submitted. Copies of this information have been submitted to the City of Port St. Lucie for verification, and the City has concurred with methodology used. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: N/A N/A Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners enter into a Road Impact Fee Credit Agreement with St. Andrews Park, Inc., the developers of the St. Andrews Park residential development, for the costs associated with the construction of Selvitz Road from Peachtree Boulevard to Parkway Elementary School and that discounting for the impacts of this development on this roadway segment the credit amount be established at at $1,117,416 (or 87.9% of the overall cost of $1,271,236). The impact fee credits granted by this action would be applicable only to the St. Andrews Park mixed use commercial/residential development, and are not assignable to any other impact fee category or classification. COMMISSION ACTION: c!J APPROVED c=J OTHER D DENIED Approved 5-0 ouglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Coordination/ Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: (agend763) ., t· , ~ ,. t ' '-' ..""., COMMISSION REVIEW: January 6, 2004 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: County Commission Community Development Director DATE: December 31, 2003 SUBJECT: Request of St. Andrews Club., Inc., developers of the SUJldrews Park mixed use commercial/residential development in the City of Port St. Lucie, for a Road Impact Fee Credit Agreement associated with the construction of Selvitz Road from Peachtree Boulevard to Parkway Elementary School. The developers of the St. Andrews Park mixed use commercial/residential development in Port St. Lucie are requesting that the County consider granting them a Road Impact Fee Credit for the value of the cost to construct the "missing" segment of Selvitz Road in the City of Port St. Lucie from Peachtree Boulevard to Parkway Elementary School. The requirement for the construction of this roadway segment was imposed by the City of Port St. Lucie as part of the basic development plan approvals for the St. Andrews Park project. Section 1-17-33.1 of the St. Lucie County Code and Complied Laws provides for a process whereby the County may consider the granting of Road Impact Fee Credits for work the meet certain minimum standards. Specifically, in the case of Selvitz Road, the "missing" segment is recognized as part of the overall transportation and circulation needs for the community and is considered to be a part of the Impact Fee Eligibility Network, thus a Road Impact Fee Credit may be considered on this property. Attached are copies of the submitted costs for the construction of this project. County staff has reviewed these submitted figures and determined that they appear to be within accepted standards and has no objection or concern over the figures submitted. Copies of this information have been submitted to the City of Port St. Lucie for verification, and the City has concurred with methodology used. Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners enter into a Road Impact Fee Credit Agreement with St. Andrews Park, Inc., the developers of the St. Andrews Park residential development, for the costs associated with the construction of Selvitz Road from Peachtree Boulevard to Parkway Elementary School and that discounting for the impacts of this development on this roadway segment the credit amount be established at at $1,117,416 (or 87.9% of the overall cosfOf$1,271,236). The impact fee credits granted by this action would be applicable only to the St. Andrews Park mixed use commercial/residential development, and are not assignable to any other impact fee category or classification. If you have any questions, please let me know. ~ITTED:\, '\ )S" ¡J\J. ') i\}\ J'<- ./ Dgfinis J. Murphy, ACP Community Development Direct DJM IMPACTFEECREDIT _ST ANDREWS1 (H) cc: County Administrator County Attorney .... t" ... . ~ '\ "" ...", , . " ORDINANCE 01- 19 lo'OUNGLII8I 8 ~ DIrE 5/l4/01 AN OR.bINAN'CE REZONING PROPERTY LOCATED WEST OF ST. JAMES DRIVE AND SOUTH OF ST. JÁI'fES BOULEVARD fROM GENERAL USE (GU) ZONING TO PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT (pun) ZONING. PROVIDING FOR APPROVAL ANI> ADOmON OF A cONcErroAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN; FROVlDrNC POR AN EFFECTIVE DATE. --". . WHEREAS, Paul Rhodes. president of St. Andrews Park, Inc., hereinafter referred 10 as the Applicant, seeks \0 rezone propen)' j()CICod weS1 of St James Duvc and south of ~'t James BouJevard and within the City of Pon St. Lucie from I Genera] Use (GU) zoning c1as!ifjcation--- to a Planned Unit Develo,pment (PUD) zonjng classification; and WIJJ:REAS. the CiTY of Port Sl. Lucie: Planning and Zoning Board held 1\ public hearir.~ on the 2nd d¡¡" of April, 2001 to cON:ider the f'C20JUaS application (pOO·::!14), notiee of said hearitlg to adjoming property owners for a radius of tbrc!:-hundred (300) feet having been given and advertising of r)ublic hearing having been made; and WHEREAS. rh~ City r.(lunc¡l held Ii pubiic hearing on th~ 14111 day of May, 2001 to consider th:: rel.oning application (POO-214). advertisi~ ofth~ pubJic bearing having been_mad:;; and WHEREAS. the subject prop crt)' is such a si~e to permit its deSign and åevelopm:nt as 1\ cohesive W1i: fulfilling tb~ PUfT>OSC of ð PUD District; and ~!ŒREAS, tD~ subJecl J::~pen~' i) !oC4tcd so as to provjd~ suitable access without genCTating traffic c.1ong mino:" streets in residential areas; and WHEREAS, the proposed PUD zoning is consistent with all applicable elements of the City', acSoptc:d Co,nprcnon3ivc PJan; Ilnd POO-214 2'" LLBLO.~tc!C: EXHIBIT A ,i ... , , '" ..." ORDINANCE 01· 19 WHEREAS, the subject propcny is sunabl:: for deveJopm:'Dt in the proposcc! manner withoul hIIUrd to pcrsons or property on or off the subject site from the po!lsibi1ity of flooding. erosion or other dangers, lUIOoyances or tncon\'cnicm:es; and WIIER£AS, a conceptUal development plan has been submitted consistent With the: requirement!; of SectÎoJl 158.170, et :ocq., Port St. Lucie City Codc; and WHEREAS, \he standards for intemaLW!.) desi&n a$ sct fonh in Section 15£.170. c:t seg., Port S1. Lucie CitY Code. will be complied with at the time of final deveJopment Approval; and NOW, THEREFORE, TOE CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE HEREBY ORDA.INS: Section 1. That the described prop:rt)' located west of St. James Drive and soulh of 81. Jam~!ì Boulevard, more particularly described by the anached map in the scaff report shall be r:zoned frl'lm the lonin~ classification of Genera] Use (aU) to th~ zoning classification of Planned Unit Ikvdopmmt (!'UD) subject to the following conditJon~: 1. Prior to obwning a Certificate of Occupancy (CO) for any commercial 0:' rcsiåential ù::.vc:lupm:;nt In~lllcù within St Andrew; Par.~! a '00 fou¡ ri~h[-of-way (ROW) IDeaTed aiong lhe southern side of St. Andrew'$ propeny as illustrated in "Exhibit A" shaJl be dedicated to the Cit)· for the purpose of crealing an east w~ corridur from Scivi:.z Road to s~. James Dr:ivc. This R.OW shaH interconnect wi1h the existing dedicated RO'\V located on the west side of the futuro: Selv1t2. R.oad and shaH intercorull:ct with the envisioned future street ROW located east of tbe subject property when h is åedlcated. POG-214 2 ~'å LLBLOÞF'TQC: ~ ~ Ut n I Jr. n .... .:II "'" I I T I-J 't_,. .;'" " "'" ....,¡ . . ORDINANCE 01- 19 2. Th~ enure SclvilZ. Road connecÜon from t~ tenmnus at Peachtree heading in IS :;uuthL:'t'I)' d;"CClian aDd connecting with the ex.isting Selvitz Road stubout shall b, under constnlctioJl prim to obtainh\ß any building penn;! for a residtnÞal building located within 51 Andn:ws Pad:., Secaor J. The road shall be complclr:d within one year. See ~xhibit hA ". In addition, thc applicant shan submit to the City an amendment to the St. James Golf Club Pl¡mned Unit Development Ordinance (No.9S-60) and to Ihe St. James final Plat Resolution (No. 98-R53) that stipuløtes ·the same road as described above win commence construction prior to the c:om~It'lion of Ihe 160't> residential builåin,:: pennit and be complcted within one year. This PUU amendment shall be submitted to the City prior to iss\òanee of ¡my Duild;ne pennit within the St. Andrews Park, Sector 1 PUD master plan area. :I. At the time of recording 1M rT.~jril-:nlial ~ubdivi$ior. pInt for St. Andrews, \h:: appl1cam !>Ì1ili provide òocumen:ation that a landscape plan for the median located withiJl S1. james Drive ad.ia.ccn~ to the: subject projcct has been approved b)' the County. The app1icant hns agreed to V.Y for 100% of tnc costs associated with 18nd~apins the mediar.. Tne landscape pl~ design shall be reviewed and IIpproved b~' the City Site. Plan Revi~w Commit\=~ prior to installation. 4. A traffic ~ignill 8t ti~ NW St. JDmCS Drive:; and NW Sl. Jaml".O: Roulevard intersection :shall be: 'PfOviàcd for and ins1alled by the apJ'licant as wal'TZnted ar..~ linked to future subdivision pial --approvals within the PUD propenies. S. l)unn KoaCl ~na.lI be Vilt:is\CÚ .t the: nmç of s'Ubd;vi~ion p1:a, approval Tor any property tÍJAt contains the r,uM Road r;&ht-of·,-"oay POO-2 '4 3 ""'ø IIR/n_~TcC C'=".tI,..,..t 1._..... __..... ._1 . :). ,. ., v """" . . ORDINANCE: 01- 19 6. Approval of thi,.; PUD is subject 10 w~ll:lnd boundary approval by rh~ South Hondo Watcr MaoRRemen1 Districl (SFWMù). 1. Li¡hùng plans shall be included wi1h site development detail plans and shall comply with th~ ligmin~ slandlJ,!z ill the zoning code. Lishting sources that can b: s~en from ~idential dcvc10pment sr.J\U be !lhielded or dc.\¡igncd so as not to creatc glare into rcsidential areas. I. Pc:r prcviouS land u...c approvaJ condition, a police substation shall be }o::lled in either Sector 1 or 2 of St. Andrew's Park. þecDor. 2. That thi:; Ordinance sball become effective ten (10) days after City Council approval. PASSED AND APPROVED by the City Council of Ih~ Cit)' of Pon St. Lucie, Florida this 14th day of Ma)', 2001. , ' 1 .' , CITY COUNCIL CITY OF PORT ST. LUCIE ~--(f;)q/ll / B~~J4~ Rober. ~. MinSK)', Mayo~ . '. . . .' I' ..... . . "... . ,J : ..: (.,...., . ." : f ,,' t,::, \.1: . ,. . _ ... , .., . ':.. ...... . s r: ! \ 1J f ". .... a ,...-1· .... · . ".. \ ...1' ,- · Airtii;/l}'k ' ./~, r\ tfj~¡;1't ___ Sandra K. Johnson, CilY Clerk APPROVED AS TO FURM / Ð>'~ ~fr' .~ ( I, I Rogepl'G. On, City Attorney POO·:!14 " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 ~ "'" RIF 04-001 A ROAD IMPACT FEE CREDIT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA AND ST. ANDREWS.. CLUB INC., IN CONSIDERATION FOR T~' CONSTRUCTION OF A PORTION OF SEL VI. RQ.AD LYING IN THE CITY PORT ST. LUÇ', ADJ T TO THE ST. ANDREWS COUNTRY CLUQ.QEVEL THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into as of this between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA, a political subdivis' referred to as "St. Lucie County" and ST. ANDREWS CLUe;, INC:; Andrews". 4.. by and tate of Florida, hereinafter referred to as "St. WHEREAS, St. Andrews has provided<for a Peachtree Boulevard to Parkway EI~fT'Ientary Selvitz Road from and of, Selvitz Road provides for excess roadway pacts generated by the St. Andrews Club Development, and WHEREAS, the Cit (City Ordinance 01-19); Lucie>rf¡t9Üired the Construction by St. Andrews in a development order WHi:;REAS, St. Lucie Coutlty has adopted a "Roads Impact Fee Ordinance," which imposes impact fees relâ,tÎl'lg to public transpo,.tåtion facilities; and E;~~J~~~~~'91'11-17 -33.1 of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County provides for credits for the 011 of non-site related road right-of-way and construction on those roadways that are a part of St. Lucie County's Roads Impact Fee Eligibility network; and, WHEREAS, the Construction required for Selvitiz Road is part of St. Lucie County's Roads Impact Fee Eligibility network; and Road Impact Fee Credit Agreement Draft #1 RIF-04-001 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 . , ,..".¡ '-" WHEREAS, based on the provisions of the Section 1-17-33.1 of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, the amount that is eligible for consideration of road impact fee credit is: $ 1,117,416 WHEREAS, St. Andrews and St. Lucie County are desirous of eg.tablishin amount of credit that St. Andrews shall be entitled to for the¢º uction from Peachtree Boulevard to Parkway Elementary School. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covena be made and performed, and in consideration of the benefits as follows: NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutlJal be made and performed, and in consideration of the as follows: the parties hereto, to of the parties, it is agreed Section 1. Incorporation by Section 2. ect and are made a part of this Agreement by Itled to a credit against Road Impact Fees in the amount of One Million, One Hun~redSeventeen Thousand, Four Hundred AncLSixteen ($ 1,117,416) dollars under tþecriteria set forth in Section 1-17-33.1 of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie COYlJwfor the property legally described in the attached Exhibit B. Limitation of Credit. The credit established by this Agreement is limited solely to the property legally described in Exhibit B and is not transferable to any other property owned by St. Andrews in St. Lucie County. The credit may only be applied against Road Impact Fees and shall not be transferable as a credit against other impact fees imposed for purposes other than roads. Road Impact Fee Credit Agreement Draft #1 RIF-04-001 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 \.f ...¡ Section 4. Assignability of Credit. St. Andrews may assign all or part of the credit described in Section 2 above to its successors in title and interest. Such assignment shall be b cordable written instrument. Before the assignment is effective, a cop signment shall be provided by St. Andrews to St. Lucie County and the City cie, at the address set forth below and the original assignment shall be records of St. Lucie CQuntv: County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 with copy to: County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 Section 5. Recordability of St. Lucie County in the public records of St. Lucie upon St. Andrews and any successors in interest and title to B. This shall be effective until all of the Road Impact Fee credits authorized 2 have been consumed through the issuance of building permits, or similar approvals. Requirement for Quarterly Reports. In consideration for the issuance of this Road Impact Fee Credit, St. Andrews agrees to provide to St. Lucie County and the City of Port St. Lucie a detailed written report on the use of the credit approved through this agreement. This report shall indicate the building Road Impact Fee Credit Agreement Draft #1 RIF-04-001 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 \...f ...,,; permit numbers, the dates of issuance of those permits and a description of the activity being permitted on which the normally required road impact fee is not being paid. The first of these reports shall be due on April 1, 2004, and shall be then be due by the 15th day of the month ending each subsequent quarter. These reports sh be sent to the addresses set forth below, County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 with copy to: County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto above written. Signed, sealed and delivered in the presence of: ATTEST: Road Impact Fee Credit Final of the day and year first Boa..~~<.> .. Oimty Commissioners St. LucIe County, Florida CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY FOR: ST. ANDREWS CLUB. INC. RIF 03-001 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 '-' -..I BY: ST. ANDREWS CLUB, INC. GENERAL PARTNER WITNESS: Road Impact Fee Credit Draft #1 RIF 04-001 Page 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 \w -...,I ACKNOWLEDGMENT STATE OF FLORIDA ) ) 55 COUNTY OF ) BEFORE M~e undersigned authority person~!,lx appe~têd< ""'."""'..'.'..", <,f'ând is authorized to sign and execute the above Agr~ and that the-r~sr:~$entations above stated are true and correct to the best of his ge, information, and belief. ,20_. SWORN TO AND SUBSCRIBED before me Road Impact Fee Credit Draft #1 RIF 04-001 Page 6 I: I I I I I I I I I' t I I I I, I I I I '-' ....; SEL VITZ ROAD COST OF CONSTRUCTION AND PERMITTING PER ROADWAY PLANS RE(~E!'"ED [1 fh \' n 8 lOG3 CiiV rvlanaqeni Office 12/08/2003 '- Cost of Construction and Permitting Per Roadway Plans Approved by City of Port St. Lucie on Category 1 a.Cost of Construction* (Contracts with Community Asphalt Attached) b. Change order for RipRap Rubble (attached) c. Change order for for hydrant relocation (attached) d. Base enhancement (attache~) Cost of swale liner installation (estimate) 2 Cost of Right-of-Way** 3 Cost of Engineering* 4 Cost of Surveys* 5 Cost of Environmental Consultants* 6 Cost of Permits* 7 Cost of Mitigation (Bluefield Mitigation Bank) 8 Cost of Landscaping, per City of Port St. Lucie Requirements and Permitted Plans 9 Lighting, Per City of Port St. Lucie and Permitted Plans 10 Transformer - FPL (estimate) 11 Electrical Conduit and Lighting Fixture Installation (estimate) Total Final Cost of Selvitz Road Construction Pursuant to the Requirements of the Plans Approved by City of Port St. Lucie Less Total Improvement Credit Cost Approved by BCC for Credit Jan/03 Remainder · Already credited in part -Already credited in full , 2003 ..., $1,508,808 . $119,350 $11,250 $44,256 $10,000 $190,758 $135,418 $18,035 $9,875 $1,925 $64,000 $25,196 $117,380 $20,000 $51.740 $2,327,991 ($1,056,755) $1,271,236 . \w ...., .. . ~ 0 ~ It) C"') C"') It) eo N ~ It) - N - - CO ~ ~ . c:Ð . eo en CO - N C"') eo cø ~ C"') cø 0 en 0 CO en CO N O. ,..... CO 0 - en O. eo CO - ,.... CO - «i ~ N N C"') C"') ,.... 0 cø - ~ 0 ~ cø ~ ~. It) - - ct en - ~ . ~ - - - C ....... v. ~ ~ ~ v. v. ~ ~ v. . w ~ c CD Q' <0 O~ a:~ NW 1-:;:) -0 W ~~ W ~ ~~ < Z Q < C. - 0 ... N ... W + Q W ~ .... W ~ C!) Q ~ Z C") c - ::1 0 z C 0 ... < (I) :;:) .... :: - (I) ... W ... ..J G) :;:) < Q W Z W () C'I en ~ ~ W :;:) ~ (I :æ Q 0.. l- e (I) () 'C 0 C .::It. (I) ~ I- - <: ãi W ~ r/) W z ëñ a: ... 0 CiS ..J C. W Ž ¡¡: I- ~ .¡: I- :: W Q e (I) :æ ¡¡: z .E :;:) ..I 'C ãi W :;:) ~ 0 (I) c. G) 0 0 r/) - ~ z .... () CD ... :æ w Q ~ :> c. I- ..I = () 0 C!) Õ. 'C <: W ... C.-.... Q W =....c <: c <: () -< E ~ w ~ z () N........ Z lIS a: Z 0 0 c. W .: ..I èi5 .æ z C")MM (3 ... < < u a: -< -=..1' I (,) (I) =L¡.CC æ Z I- ... - - b en a: ..J - 0 0 o ........ CD 0 0 w w ~< - .... .... 0 z () I- ~ ~ <fl. ... ..J () m ().c__ 0 .cu........ ~I I _IISCDCD O)CÞIt)It) NID-- CO" lIS J:2 0.....)( ....CÞ.c1lS .... N C"') ~ It) CD .... co 0) 1t»c.L¡. " 0 I- ~ ¡- Z 0 U . - , ~" EDITION"" 1 I : ! 1 9 9 1 AlA DOCUMENT A10l-1997 1Smndard Form of Agreement Between Owner and Contractor III ~vhere the basis of payment is a UNIT PRICE A G R £ E MEN T mad~;J.s of th~ in th~ year 2003 iln words. ¡n.lic¡lt~ all,v. month and .vt¡lr) 8 E T WEE N the Owner: (N.I1n1:. Ilddress ¡lnd other information) md th~ Contr:l.ctor: (Name. ,,¡ddrcss c.md other information) The I'1":,:i,:::t is: (.v¡lm~ ,,¡nd [OC:Mion) E.nqi.neer Tht:~~~ IS: ¡.\'.I/n.:. ¡¡.lJr.:» ,lIui ¡)lÍa'r iITji,rrT/aÛ"/I) 24th day of March st. James Golf Club, Ltd. 500 s. Australian Ave., Ste. 110 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Community Asphalt Corp. 5100 29th Cou:::-t Vera Beach, FL 32967 Selvitz Road (between Peachtree & Manville) CAC #Aß-61 stephen Cooper, P.E. & Associates, 209 NE Sagamore Terrace Port st. Lucie, FL 34983 The <.. )\\·~.:r ~m~l Clmtra..:tol" Jgl"ee õlS follows. C.JfJVrlghr 1915. 1918. 19,5. 1937, 1951. 19sa. 1961. 1963. 1967. 1974. 19i7. 1987, .c 1997 by The Amenc.)n Imlllule "I .....rd'llecrs. ReproduClion 01 rhe malerlal herein or subS/anlia quolallon 01 "S provIsions w"hOul ,,"rulen permIssion . . '.1.. ..... _ _.1 '11_ ...:__......._..;_1_......._1_.._1_.___......:__ . . . ¡his documenr has impor- tant :egai ccnsequenc~s. Consultarion with an- attorney is encouraged with respect to its completion or modification. AlA Document A201-1997, General Conditions or the Contract for Construction, is adopted in this document by reference. Do not use with other general conditions unless this document is modified. This document has been approved and enciorsed by The Associated General Contractors of America. I~'~. ..~,~. ~,;'/¡¡\',~ - ,t) 199' -'IA\!I AlA DOCUMENT Al01·199¡ OWNEiI-CONTilACiOR AGilEEMENT . ofhe .Aomerlcan InS:Jlure 01 Archilecrs Ins New York Avenue, N.W Washinglon. D.C. 200C6-5¿92 I I '-' .., I ARTICL.! 1 THE CONiRACT DCCUME~7S Th~ Cor.tr;1~t Dücume:1l:ì ':DI'\:ii.st of this A~:~em~nt. ConJitions of th~ Contr:.lct l G~r.c:r::.i. Supplem~r.t:lry ;¡r.d I)tht:r CL~r.diti\)r.:. \. Dr:J.wir.gs. S rè~ii'j~.:J.ti,)n:¡, :\.Jdend.1 i:¡~uèd prier t,) èx~,util)n of this :\greeme~t. other docum~nt:i listed in thi:¡ .~grè:::ment .lnJ ModiticaLions is:¡ued aft~r è:-;~cution of this .-\çel::mèrtt: thèS~ form the Cüntr:u:t, and ,ue;1S fullva part of the Cor!lr:lct as if attac.h~J to this Agreement or repe:lteJ herein. The Contract represents tht: entin~ and integ:1tt:d :1gr~ement betwcen the parties hereto and supersedes prior n~goti:.ltions, representa- .lians or agreements, either written or 01':11. An enumer:1lÌon of the Contract Documents. other -1ñan Moditic:ltions. appe:lrS in Artide 8. . .. ~RTICl.£ 2 THE WOR( OF THIS CONTRACT The (:)ntr::.ctor shall fuily e:œ'.:utè the 'v'';ork describd in the Contr::.ct Documents. e~ceplto ~he è.'(tent specifically indicated in the Contract Documents to be the responsIbility of others. . . ARTICLE: 3 DATE OF COMMENCEM£NT AND SUBSTANTIAL COMPLETION 3.1 The date of commencement of the Work sh:111 be the d:1te of this Agreement unless a different date is stated below or provision is made for the date to be fi.'(ed in a notice to proceed . '.. issued by the Owner. · (Insert the dllte of commencement if it di/Jers I;om thl! date of this .4greemenl or, if" applic/Jble, .Iate thaI the · datt will be fixed in a nO/ict te¡ proceed.) ... · If. prior to the commencement of the Work. the Owner requires time to file mortgages. mechan- ic's liens and othc:r 5~curity interests. the Owm:r's time requirement shall be as follows: .' . .. ·3.2 The CJntr::.ct Time sh:1ll be me:lSured from the date of commencement. 3,J The Cont~ctor sh:111 aÒieve Substantial Completion of the entire Work not l:lt~!' than . 1 80 calendar Jays from the date of commencement. or:lS follows: (Insert number of' calen¡,j/Jr days. .J.ltemulively. Il ':Illendllr J/Jte may Í1e used wnlm coordinated with till: J..le of conrmmcement. Unlltss slllted elsewhere in thl! Conlrllcl Docume:nts. insert .my requirements for tarli~r Sl4bslllntiul Comple/iorr of cerr.lÌn porI ions of the World weather, strikes, acts of God, etc. excepted. . subject to Jdjustments of tllis Contr:1ct Time a$ provided in the Contr:¡,ct Documents. ([¡ullrt pro\'isions. if' Jrry. for /itluiJ/Jled Jdm/Jg.:s rrf/J/il1g te, fwilur.: to complet.: 0/1 time or for 110l1us pUY/llenlS for tCl'/Y .:¡¡mp/ll/ion o,f the ~"·ùrk.) $1,000 per diem damages for any lateness - - f~\; 1111'· "f: thereafte~"·~./: ~ ~..r.;wl-~~ ~;'·~~S.:. -~- ~\ _.'. .:::::::.:..:. . , Cl19'H AIA~ AlA DOCUMENT A101-1991 OWNER·CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT ~ The American Insrilule of !o\rchi reers 1735 New York Avenue. N.W. washingron, D.C. 2ooo6-S':'2 I I '-' AitTIC!.i" CONiRACT SUM 4.1 Th~ O'.ý;'1e:r .¡bll ra~' the: (.>I1t::.lI:t0f the: (¡)ntr:lI:t Sum in 'ur~e:1t funds for tb.~ Com¡-:Ktl)r's p~rfor:nJn..:e or" the: CJrm~'t. Th~ C0r.t:;¡ct Sum shall be: see-attached "Schedule of Unit Prices" Dclbrsis ), subj~ct to additions .lnd ¿ducti\.H1s J5 i'roviJed in the: Comract Documents. 4.2 Th~ Contract Sum is based upon the: roHowing altc:rnates. if lI1Y. which are described in the .CQrltract Documents ¡¡nd are herebY' Jccc:pted by the Owner: -T3!1l11l dlle l1umbttrs or ocher idl1nci,fìcution of ¡Jc;;.:pt~d ,.¡Jtt:fI1¡':S. If de::isiol1S on ochir .Jlt/tfl1lJtttS IJrtt to be maJot by chI! ()wl1otr s¡Û]iequenr to lho! ot;rccution 0/ thÜ ,J.greeml!l!t. ¡lItach II scherillltt of stich tJchotr IIlrernal!s showing the amou/lt for i¡c:h ,md lhe ,Jute IIIhen that amount .expir.e,;.J 4.3 Unit pricc:s. if any, are as follows: '. See attached "Schedule of Unit Prices" .- -';'.ARTICI.E 5- PAYMENTS .-.". . ,.:> .5.1 PROGRESS PAYMENTS . _. 5.1.1 Basd upon Applications for Payment submitted to the Architect by the Contractor and Ce..'"tifkates for Payment issued by the Architect. the Owner shall make progress payments on __ . account of the Contra~t Sum to the Contra~tor as provided below and elsewhere in the Contract Documents. 5.1.2 The period covered by each Appikation for Payrn~nt shaH b~ cne c:ie:1åar month ending on the last Jay of the month. or as follows: 5.1.3 Provided th:lt an Application for Payment is received by the .-\rchitect not later than the 25th day of:l month. the Owner shall mak~ payment to the Contractor not later than the 25th day of the next month. If an Appli~ation for Pa~ment is received by the Archite:ct after th~ application date fixed above. pay- m~nt shall be: made: by the Owner nClllater than 1 0 (ten) daY!I after the Architect re¡;eives the Applicatil.1n for Pay-mt:rï.t. 5.1.4 Ea¡;h Application for Paym~nl shall be based on the most recent schedule of values submit- ted br the Contractur in ac-:orJal1-:e with the Contr:1~t Du~u.ments. The: s-:hedule uf values shall all~ate the entire: Contr:l~t Sum ;lIill,ng th~ various portions of the Work. The s.:hedule oi values shall be: prep:u.:J in suÒ form and supl'0rt.:d by su~h dat.1 to subst1ntiate its accur:1l."',I as the Archile~t m:1Y requir..:. This'scheJule. unless llbjecled to by th..: .\rchilt:ct. shall be used as :1 basis tor re\'iewing the: (,mlr;\Ctor's .\pplicatilll1s for P:1yment. .., I . .. = ,','. ¡ 1111 ~ It' ~..\\,~ ///; ~~'~".i-1 ~~_1 ..~ r:-=;,- ~~-=~::;f '=- ..........--- '-- C 1997 "I" C!I AlA DOCUMENT A1C1·1997 OWN ER ·CONTRACTOR AGREEMENT I :The American Inscirure of Architecrs 1735 New York Avenue. N.W. washington. D.C. 20006-5292 I '-' 5.1.S ApplicJtiuns fur p;¡y::;¿nt sh..!ll ¡ndicJt.,: tho:: po::rc~ntJ~e 1)[" ..:omr.¡~tiun cf ~:.l..:h i'l)rtiun ur- ~ht: Work;lS of th~ ~!~J ;)[ tho:: ~c:ric,l ,;ov~r¿J b~' the' ;\pplic:lt:or: ti.:r L'Jyr.1t:~nt. . . 5.1.6 Subjt:ct to otj¡~r rrovi:õil)ns or tht: CUrlt:.Kt Doc:lm~nts. th~ J.mour'll of ¿JÒ pro~¡,~ss pJY- ment shall b~ computc'li :lS follows: .1 Ta~e that ['ortion or- the Contract Sum prop~rly allocable to complt:~t:d Work as dder- mined by multiplying the po::rc¿nlage completion of e:1ch portion \,f the \'':ork by th~ share of th~ Contract Sum <llb::lt~d lü that portilJn of th~ Work ir: tht: schedul~ of val- ues.less retJinagt: 1)[ ten percent ( 1 0 '~/t). Pt:nding tinal aetl!rmi- nation of cost to the Owner of changt:s in thl! 'Nark. amounLS not in dispute shall be induded as providd in Subparagraph ;-.J.:i of AlA Document -~Ol-!99ï; .l Add that portion of the Contract SÙm propt:r!y allocable to matt:r:als and equipment ¿dive red and suit;¡oly stort:J :It tho:: silt: for subsequl!nl incorpor:ltion in thl! compieted constructiL1n (or. if approved in adv:¡nc~ by the Owñt:r. suitably stored off the site at a location agreed upon in writing), less retainage of ten percent ( 1 0 %); .1 SuctI'<lct the: ~ggreg¡¡Le- of previous payments made by the Owner; and ... Sublrnct amounts. if any. for which the Archit~t has withhdd or nullified a Certificate for Payment JS provided in Paragraph 9·5 of AlA Document iU01-l99ï· .. . 5.1.7 The progress payment amount determined in accordance with Subparagraph ;.1.6 shall be further modifit:d under the following circumstances: . .1 Add. upon Substan tial Completion of the Work. a sum sufficient to inc.ease the total pay- ments to the full amount of the Contrnct Sum. less such amounts as the Architect shall determine tår incomplete Work. retain:lg~ applicable to such work and unsettled claims: and (Subp/Jrllgraph 9.8.) of.41A Document A~ol-l997 requires reieasr! of appiicablr! retuin£lge upon SubstantiiJi CO/'!'lpietiorr o/Work with consl?nt of ;illrery, il any.) .2 Add. if final compll!tion of the Work is thereafter materi<llly delayed through n.o fault of the Contractor. any additional amounts payable in accordance with Subparagraph 9·10·3 of .AlA Document .A:!.01-t997· ',"'. .' ,. . ,", ~ ~ . ". . ... >.5.1.8 Reduction or limitation of retainage. if :lny. shall be as follows: . (If it is inrended. prior to Subrt.mtial CiJ/'!'Ipil!lion of the .mli re Wùrk. to rrduce or limit the re!ùirlage resulting "from /hI! percentages insmed ill Clauses ).1.6.1 and ). .6.~ above. alld thi> is not e.Tplained elsewhere in the Contract Docume.~t$. illjer: here ,?ro~'isi;;r.~ for ;:dt reduction or limitation.) .. 5.1.9 E.:c¡;ept with th~ O'"ner's prior .1ppro\':l1. the Contr:l¡;tor sh.1lI not m;lk~ aJ\':.mo,;~ payments to supplie:rs for mat.:riJ.ls ur ':l¡uipm.:nl whid1 h~I"c OlJt bt:t:n Jdivt:rt:u ;lnd stured .1t tht: sitt:. 5.2 FINAL PAYMENT 5.2.1 Final p.lyme:l1t. ":llnstitllting tho: .:ntirt: unpaiJ babn¡;.: ,)1" the: Clll1tr:.1¡;t Sum. shall b~ made by the Owner tù th~ C,1I1tr:.l..:tor "h~n: .1 th~ Cuntr.l..:tlJr has fully rerform~J ¡he Contr:l¡;t ~:<¡;.:rt t~)r tht: CIJntr:l'tLJr's rt:sponsibil- ity to ¡;,wrc:ct WlJrk. :lS rro\'iJ~J in Sur.par:.1gr:lph 1~_~.~ llf AI..1" DlJo,;umc:nl .\~lH-1997. J.nd tl.l s~llisfy dIn!.:!' rt:quire:mc:nts. ii :111\'. whid1 c:xtc:nu bc:yond tinal r.1ym~nl: .1nJ .2 a tin.11 C.:rlili..:ak f.,1' P;¡yme:nl h~lS b~cn issuc:c.I by the: Ar¡;hitc¡;t. ..", I . I - 'I':¡;-"II' ',I ='. '.. ""1'1/:." ~~~% '- ClOT AI"" AlA DOCUMENT A101·1997 OWNER-CONTRACTOR AGRE~MHH I :The American Insrirute of Architecrs 1735 New York Avenue. N.W. washington. D.C. 20006-5292 I ~ 5.2.2 Th~ <:Iwnd,-; ~:¡ul ra:'ïi1t:~1t ~I; tht: (Lmtr:¡.::tnr sbll Ct: mJJe m.l latt::" Ò::m }O days ;¡r"t¿r thè is~u:1n'::~ af lh~ ...\.r":~1it~~~'.; r;i1J.1 ~~~rtitì.::;¡t¿ f,)r Pa)'r.:ènt. or as fl)¡¡o\~s: ARTIC1.£ 6 T:RMINAjION OR SiJSPENSION 6.1 The. Contract maY' bè tërminaled by thè Own~r or the Contractor as provided in Article 14 of ALA Document A':Ol-l99i· -ã:2 The Work may be suspended by the Owner as providd in Article 14 of AL.l, Document A.;01-l99i· AR¡¡Cl.! 7 MISCH!.ANEOUS i'RCV1SiONS 7.1 Where reference is madè in this ..l.gr¿ement to a provišion of ALA Document A':Ol-t99i or another Contract Document. the refèrenœ refers to that provision as amended or supplemented , by I>lher provisions of the Contract Documents. 7.2 Payments due and unpaid under the Contract shall bear interest from the date payment is due at the rate stated below, or in the absence thereof, at the !egal rate prevailing from time to time at the place where the Project is located. ,(Insert reltt of Ùutresl agreed upon. il Ilny.) (Usury /UW$ and rec/uirements rmaer the Federal Truth in Llmding Act. ;imilar ;ratt and 10ciJl ,onsumer credit laws: IUId other regulations at the Owner's ana Contractor'; prinÚpui plllC~s of eu;iness, the location 0/ the Projict and elsewhere may a!lee: thl! validity ofthi"> provi;ion. Ll!gal .zavi,e should be obtained with respect to deletion; or modi fica lions. ¡rnd ¡/oo regarding requirement; such as written disclosures or wlJivers.J .... 1.3 The Owner's represent:ltive is: (Name. address r.IlId Olher irrformcl~ionJ Paul Rhodes st. James Golf Club, Ltd. 500 S. Australian Ave., Ste. West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Phone: (561) 659-5400 FAX: (561) 659-5671 110 .. 7.4 The Conlr'l\:t.:,/;:''> representative is: (Nume. addrw Qlld olhc:r inform¡'¡lÍon) 'will I . . Operation Manager Corp. Robert E. Bounds, Communit~sphalt 5 ¡-OO 29th Court Vero Beach, FL 32967 Phone: (772) 770-3771 FAX: (772) 770-3707 7.S Neithe:r the Owner's nor th~ COl1tra.::tI>r's representative: shall be ~hanged without te:n days' written notiœ to the: uther party. 7.6 Other provisions: , ' "!'!ìjÏI:'i\ ~".!(..:/i." ~. J'I'".J :, :..~.: '. r-.. ~., ~~ L.S: o._·~_..-:J =:¿.~.~O .- --- C191: AI Act AlA DOCUMENT A101-1997 OWNER·CON TRACTOR AGREEMENT I . The American Insrirure · of .o\rchirKts 1735 New York Avenue. N.W. Washinglon, O.c. 20006-5292 I ~ ...., I ARnc!.! :.1 E~Uj'.'!.~.~T:CN CF C:NHACT DCCUM~.\iS a.1 Th( C~flt:-J':: C-û.;'.,;:r.~:1I$. ':''':';~l-l for i\!odir:L::1lions issud Jf:.è!" ~:œr.:~t:on. tJf this .J..g¡-~~r:!::!'!t.>l.n: ~nc:":"':~rJtëJ ~ :·ùl1lì\.·i~j: 8.!.: 711:: Ag!'~':~~~!!t is this exe::::t~d 199:- ~ditiol1 of the S¡,:ndard Form of A~re~me!!t 8dwe~n Own~r :1~J (ont":L:tur, ALA D()I.:::me~t .-U0l-199i· _ aH-..2 T;,c: (,;enèr:¡! Conditions m ~he ,9'77' ditiún of the Gè:-:~r:J.! C¡m¿itions of the Contr:lct for ~ï::oasll"",¡c:iun. .1J.\. Document :\~al-1997. 8.1.3 The Supplement:~1 :1nd olher Cun.¿itions of the Contr'~ ~~ are those contained in the Project M:muai dj[¡~(f- . . :1nd:¡r lS follows: Dccument 7:de l'::g~s N/A 8.1..4 .The Spedic:tions ar~ those :::mt:lined in the Proje~ M: !.1al d:¡t.ed, as in Subpar:graph 3.1.3, :1nd are as follows: (Either Ust thl! Sprci/i¡;ations here or rl:/er to an e.':itibit .ittached 10 Ih .!.grument.) :-. .. S~.:ùo It TIùe Pages .. . N/A 8.1.5 The: D~wings:lre J..S fullows. md are d:lled . different d:ue i~ shown bdow: / Either IÜr the Druwin!JS h.:re tIT rr!~r II) 1M' ¡::a,ibir ..ma...hl.'d ro Ihis ..!.~ :1?ment.) unless ~ ~umb~r Tit!~ D:1t~ See attached "8.1.5 Dra' .¡ings" II . . . ,- "!\.¡jiiTI.';\ .$~ --- ~"97 "1~iI AlA DOCUM ENT AI01-t9!J7 OWN EiI-CO N TRACTOR AGREEMENT . ."he American Insri'ure of Archi'ec:s 1735 New York Avenue. N.W. Washinston. O.c. 200C&-S2!Z I !tl1'¡p~. MON 09:47..FA\...p 770 3707 .:::~r~1f ..' . ~,;..,:.. .~..... 'W....... ;... ;.~..~;t·/.'~·:·: ~~. ..' ·lft?'N:::' hl~~,. ;i 'ny .", "::::'W' :i~(·~:.:t.)i :..}', -¡r Community Asphalt Corp P:1~~S N/A .. Portior.s of Addend;! relating Lo bidding requin:menls are not p:¡rt of the Conlrõlct Do~umc:nts . .... unless the bidding requiremenl~ :Irc: also enumer:lled in lhis Artidc: 8. ·1.1.7 Other documen1S. if any. forming p:1rt of the Conlract Docum.:nts õlre as follows: . (/.iSI hcrt uny .,dditiunu/ ciocumen/S Ihdl ,m: inttn"~tI to for/1/ P'lfllJ,{ Ihe C"tltr,,,, DOCllmenlS.AL{ DUCllm~nl .. ;.:: .·A:OI.¡.... provides Ihal /1iJJing rcqui,tmtnlS such .u wlverlin:nJtnl ur invihl/ion u bid. lnstrlleliuns fo Bidders. .. ',""'plc formi ¡¡nd the: Cl.Jntructor"$ bid' are 110j pIJrl of the Cùnlrlu.1 D",o,,",,"nts unless enumrralea in lhis ·Agrelm.:nl. They sÎluu/.t be [isled here only if intlllJer.l to be pltrf uf the Con",w Dor:umenu.) .. Certificate of Insurance .,' . '. .,' ", - . .. . ....": ".. ,. " .. This Agreem~nl is enl~rei:! into:ls or the d¡¡y :md·ye:¡r first wriuen :1DOve and is ~)(ecule:d in :1Lle:lst three origin;)! ccries, of which on~ is to be: delivered to the Contr~ctor, one lo the Arcnilect for use in the :1òmi!li~lï~ljon of the Conlr:l.:l. :1nd the remainder Lo lhe O'.¡nc:r. . . -, ST. LTD. OWN ?aill ~~ "w1I (pri/l..:d '...',Ie nll./lirl.-J 1 [',ifllt,] JIII/,' ;l11.llilh·) Robert E. Bounds, Operation Manager (AUTION: f,'1I ;JIrIU¡'; il);1I ./1"1 ,,,·i.~i,,,,l ;\1.... (/.!nl1lI,·/1I "' ,I [,,1'11.(.',1 'I'r,."i",,;,.". (Irigilht/$ ...",t..i" 11,,' .·\f.-l/,)yi, prinl"/ ii' /',\1; li'-,.'!I>ù/ /"·,.,,..../:''''10 h'i .1/',' III,.~., ¡m..Iu,"(';l ilt w...·",d,/IIu· wIt" ih.· 1";I,,,,I;U"." 10 Ihi; J,I':UIIIL·m. . .,~, .. ...,,''\.~:. .'. .-. .... 11,_.. - C"': A,,,IJ AlA DOCUMENT A10t·19'7 OWN(~·CONtRACTOR ~GIIEtMENT The Ameli'OIn Insri'ule of ArcMeca 1735 New York Avenue. N.W. ,^,uhins,on. D.C. 20006-5292 ~006 I . I . ,. ~.;",;;~·~~~:S;:~-4\.:~t-?.ëi.:t~~~::i~ ~ a. i.â 7h~·~.JJo:.:nJ.l.:i In·,·. ..lr,; ;l.~ t'U¡¡I~""~: ~¡uI71b~r L..·~t~ ('~~~ N/A ['ortions of Adde:tda relating to bidding :-:quirem~nts :Ire not p:ut or the Contr:lct Documents uniess t.he bidding requir~:nents :ll"<= also ~numer:lted in this ,~'"Ude 8. 8.1.7 Other dac..lmenlS. if ::.ny. forming part of the Contr:lct Doc..Lment:i :lre as fonows: (LÙt hen uny ,(Jditionaldoc:,¡menu ¡hut ilrl! intl!mJed 10 form part ul the C¡Jntroct Documents..ill DOC/lment ..\.":oL-/997 providlls ¡hut bidding rcqujre/l1er.u ~uât ws ~vertiscmt!l:: ur invitution to ¡'id. Instructions to Biddl!rr. samp/I! ¡órms and ¡hI! C¡;n:rc:c:ois bid CJrl! !TOt p/Jl't oj ¡he C;Jntrac: Doc:llnents unl,:ss trluml!roted in this .J.gn:emt:nt. They )ÌIIJuid be listed here ollly i,f imend,:d to be par: u/ ¡hI! CuntNc: Documents.} Certificate of Insurance This Agreement is <=ntered into:ls of the day ::.nd" ye~ first writ.ten :lbove :lnd is e..-cecut.ed in :It !e::.st th~e arigin::l ~opie:i. of which one is to be delivered to lh~ Contnctor. one to the Arc:hitect far use in the admi¡¡ui.¡auon. of lbe ClJn~ct. wå the rem:lÍmi<=r to the Owner. ST. CON i RAe T 0 RiSignuwrl!J LTD. COMMUNITY ASPHALT CORP. OWN i R I'Si~""wrcJ 'wII . . . ; Prillll!c.i Ifwnr: ,mol mi.:) Robert E. Bounds. Ooeration Manager (l'rmt.:t.Í JI~nt' oJtIol ¡irid Q.U1'1CH: rlm ,hlllli.i ii!Jll.m l.rigill.z/ '\l.-\. d",'Cllm.·nt IIr .¡ /iL.·m.·c.i ":pm';".,i",,. l'riginiJi> ..'It/twill tll/: .-\.l.t /,)gi, print.:J ilf .-cd: !i...·~r~·.." ".,.,r".!;/.":i"":i ,Ir,' ,Jr,I:;': ¡JTI.'Ja...·.l i" ....ù.rtÍ.mù· with rft.: {mtrul·til)ni ¡IJ t/,i> J,ICUI/ICm. ,~, ..:?!';~ "# I... , - OI9.~ AIA<II AlA DQCUMENT A101·1"7 OWNE:!-CONTRACrOR '¡'GitE~MEN T I . Tl¡e">IImerian Insriture of Archarecs Ins New York Avet1ue. N.W. Washington. D.C. 20006-5292 I I .. 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145 150 155 160 165 170 175 '-' Description C:eanng Construct Pit E:1trance Construct Temp. Dewatering SwaJe Erosion Control Prepare Pits for Demucking Demuck Pits Placing Material In Stockpile Pit Excavation (E.~cavate & Lead On lay) 5100 29th Court Vera Beach, FL 32907 Ph: (772) 770-3771 Fax: (772) 770-3707 ...." . .. Schedule of Values Backfill Over Excavated Pit Slopes wi Stockpiled Muck Dress Lake Slopes Sodding Seed 8. Mulch Mobilization Construcftion Staking Furnish Boring Report Silt Fence Turbidity Barner Clearing Remove Existing Asphalt Pavement Strip 8. Stockpile Topsoil Roadway Cut to Roadway Fill Spread & Compact Fill From "Off-Site" Sources Fine Grade Roadway Final Dress Construct 3D' Wide Temp Ditch Sodding Seed 8. Mulch 12" Stabilized Subgrade 10" Coquina Base (Roadway) 2" 1/2" Type S Striping and Signage Stabilized Access Read 4" Concrete Sidewalk Milling 12"x1S"ECP 18" RCP 20,000.00 CY 3.500.00 LF 5,000.00 SY 10.000.00 SY 1.00 LS 1.00 LS 1.00 LS 12,400.00 LF 900.00 LF 14.25 ACRE 2.08S.0C SY 10.519.00 CY 3.500.00 CY _ 28.000.00 CY 22.341.00SY 1.00 LS 2,700.00 LF 40,000.00 SY 10.267.00 SY 22.341.00 SY 16.540.00 SY 18.084.00 SY 1.00 LS 100.00 SY 5.380.00 SY 2.200.00 SY 102.00 LF 378.00 LF Page 1 Total Bid Pnce 55.250.00 53.850.00 55.320.00 54.950.00 512,815.00 536.600.00 51.25 587.500.00 51.1i $5.91 $1.05 50.17 529.260.00 $15.840.00 51,550.00 50.75 510.00 52.550.00 52.20 52.48 51.65 50.50 50.90 Sa.500.00 56.60 SUO 50.20 51.58 57.25 56.25 $17.500.00 55.00 $16.50 $2.25 568.25 530.74 $23.400.00 $20.685.00 $5,250.00 51.iOO.00 529.260.00 515,840.00 51.550.00 53.300.00 53,000.00 537.ï62.50 54,593.60 525.087.12 SS.ï75.Ûü $14.000.00 520,106.90 Sa,500.00 517.820.00 544.000.00 52.053.40 535.298.78 5119.915.00 $113.025.00 517.500.00 5500.00 588.770.00 54.950.00 SÔ.961.50 511,619.72 . . '-' ...., 180 24" RC? 1,076.00 LF $39.22 $42.200.72 185 30" RCP 50.00 LF $50.88 52,544.00 190 66" RCP 330.00 LF $229.00 $75,570.00 195 72" RCP 300.00 LF $252.00 $75,600.00 200 24" CMP 250.00 LF $37.10 59,275.00 205 '30" CMP 20.00 LF $44.52 $890.40 210 36" CMP 150.00 LF $99.00 $14,850.00 .2já. 24" Concrete Collar 3.00 EACH 51,515.00 $4,545.00 -zzo 30" Concrete Collar 1.00 EACH $1,750.00 51,750.00 .. 225 12" x 18" MES 8.00 EACH 51,260.00 $10,080.00 230 30" Conc E:1dwall 1.00 EACH 52.835.00 52,835.00 235 36" Conc Endwall 1.00 EACH 53,710.00 53,710.00 240 ïy~let 12.00 EACH 52,544.00 $30,528.00 245 4' Diam Manhole 3.00 ElICH 51,908.00 55,724.00 250 Triple 66" Headwall 2.00 EACH $48,300.00 $96,600.00 255 ïriple 72" Headwall 2.00 EACH $48,300.00 $96.600.00 260 Class V Finish For Headwalls 4,000.00 SF $1.00 $4,000.00 265 Construct Handrail On Headwalls 650.00 LF $68.00 $44,880.00 270 Construct Control Structure 6.00 EACH 58,058.00 $48,348.00 275 Relocate Ex Hydrant 6.00 EACH 51,500.00 59,000.00 TOTAL $1,431,038.64 NOTES: 1 Payment for Item #85. "Clearing", shall be based on the actual area cleared by the contract unit pries. 2 Our unit price ror Item #250. "Triple 66" Headwall". and Item #255. "Triple 72" Headwail", does not include slope protection. This shall be done on a time and material basis. . . Page 2 '-' ...,j 8.1.5 Drawings Number !ill! Date . -- . 1of9 Cover Sheet N/A 2of9 Horizontal Central, Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan 03/11/03 30f9 Horizontal Control, Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan 03/11/03 4of9 Horizontal Central, Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan 03/f1/03- 50f9 Horizontal Control, Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan 03/11/03 6of9 Horizontal Control, Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan 03/11/03 7of9 Horizonta! Control, Paving, Grading & Drainage Plan 03/11/03 8of9 Paving, Grading & Drainage Details & Notes 03/11/03 90f9 Cross Sections & Drainage Details 03/11/03 S-1 of 3 Skewed Concrete Endwall with 3 - 66" Pipes 03/10/03 S-2 of 3 Skewed Conc:'"ete Endwall with 3 - 66" Pipes 03/10/03 S-3 of 3 Skewed Conc:'"ete Endwall with 3 - 66" P!pes 03/10/03 S-1 of 3 Straight Conc:'"ete Endwall with 3 - 72" Pipes 03/10103 S-2 of 3 Straight Conc:'"ete Endwall with 3 - 72" Pipes 03/10103 S-3 of 3 Straight Ccnc:'"ete Endwall with 3 - 72" Pipes 03/10103 01 of 01 Aerial Overlay 02114/03 1 of 2 Concaptual Stormwater Masterplan 03/11/03 2of2 Conceptual Drainage Details 03/11/03 1 of 1 Basin #3 Temporary Drainage Plan 08/12/02 1 of 1 Basin #5 Temporary Drainage Plan 08/i 4/02 1 of 7 Landscape Plan 03/03/03 2of7 Landscape Plan 02/28/03 30f7 Landscape Plan 02/28/03 4of7 Landscape Plan 02128/03 50f7 Landscape Plan 02/28/~3 6of7 Landscape Plan 02l28/û3 7of7 Landscape Details 02//:"8/03 . . . . r '-" ...." Consulting Engineers · Land Surveyors 2980 South 25th Street . Ft. Pierce, FL 34981 (772) 464-3537 . Fax (772) 464-9497 www.ct-eng.ccm Oc~ober 3, 2003 C&T Job No. 02-002 Selvitz Road Corr. . . FEDEX TO: Mr. Paul Rhodes St. James Golf Club 500 Australian Avenue South Suite 120 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: Selvitz Road Improvement Project Bank & Shore Rubble Riprap Dear Mr. Rhodes: Attached, please find correspondence regarding the price proposal from Community Asphalt regarding the installation of riprap slope protection for the four headwalls located at the Canal 105 and 106 culvert crossings. The total cost for all four locations will be $115,000.00, which equates to under $30,000 per headwall. We have reviewed the price proposal and find it to be in line with other local projects. We would recommend that you approved the proposed installation and associated pricing. Upon notification, we will process the appropriate change order to the contract. As always, sh-ould you have any questions with regards to tffis information, please contact me. Sincerely, . . \. , TERPENING, INC. ...." Consulting Engineers · Land Surveyors 2980 South 251h Street 0 Fl. Pierce, FL 34981 (772) 464-3537 0 Fax (772) 464-9497 www.ct-eng.com Memorandum - .- -- .0 Date: October 2, 2003 To: Mr. Stef Matthes, P.E. Qirec:or of '::ns:nJG::Ígn . S0~J()1,.. 'IJ-P . # Mr. Vernon T. Hackett, P.E. ~"? . . Construction Manager Job No.: 02-002WA1 From: Cc: M. Bethune, File RE: REQUEST FOR CHANGE ORDER - BANK & SHORE RUBBLE RIPRAP C&T Project No.: 02-002WA1 Description: Selvitz Road Improvements We have attached pricing information for bank and shore rubble riprap slope treatments of Canal 105 and 106 on the above referenced project. We have performed price comparisons with other projects utilizing bank and shore rubble riprap in the area and have a signed agreement by Community Asphalt for a reduced price that is in line with what we feel is fair and reasonable for furnishing and installing this material at this location. The total cost for this slope treatment is $115.000.00. Additionally, please be advised that the Contractor proceeded with the installation of this required treatment in good faith to prevent delays with project completion. - We request that you review this pricing information with the owner and process a change order at your eartiest convenience. - VTH/vh Attachments . . \.,. ..., Consulting Engineers · Land Surveyors 2980 South 25th Street . Ft. Pierce. FL 34981 (772) 464-3537 . Fax (772) 464-9497 www.ct-eng.com October 6, 2003 C&T Job No. 02-002 Selvitz Road Corr. . . FED EX TO: Nfr. Paul Rhodes St. James Golf Club 500 Australian Avenue South Suite 120 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: Selvitz Road Improvement Project Sand-Cement Headwall Slope Protection - Cross Drain Culvert Station 26+00 Dear Mr. Rhodes: Attached, please find correspondence regarding the price proposal from Community Asphalt regarding the installation of sand-<:ement riprap slope protection for the cross culvert headwall located on the east side of Station 26+00. The total cost for the application will be $4,350.00. We have reviewed the price proposal and find it to be in line with other local projects. We would recommend that you approved the proposed installation and associated pricing. Upon notification, we will process the appropriate change order to the contract. As always, should you have any questions with regards to this information, please contact me. Sincerely, RPENING, INC. . . .' OCT-e~-2e03 11:17\. CULPEPPER & TERPEHIHG 772 785 iH....." P.02 ClL CULPEPPER · ~~Õ;Ò;TERPENING, INC. .·Memorandum Consulting Engineers · Land Surveyors 2980 South 25th Street· Ft. P1erce, FL 34981 (772) 484-31537 . Fu (772) 484-9497 www.=1-eng.com Date: October 1, 2003 . From: Mr. Vernon T. Hackett P.E. Construction Manager '1 Jcb No.: 02·C02'NA1 ./ To: Mr. Stef Matthes, P.E. Director of Ccnstruction "'". Cc: File RE: SANC..ceMENT HEADWALL RECOMMENDA T10N C&T Project No.: 02-D02WA1 Description: Selvitz Road Improvements I We have attached a price submittal from Community Asphalt (see attachment IAI) based on the request from Culpepper & Terpening, dated September 17, 2003 (see attachment 18') for the installation of 37 CY of sand-œment riprap on the above referenœd project as a method' of slope protection at a drainage structure. The current roadway design requires the construction of a headwall for a cross drain at approximate STA 26+00, Rt. that outfalls into a ditch that has a perpendicular alignment with Selvitz Road. The elevation. of the ditch and - headwall c.ooeates a U-shaped slope that must be treated from the toe cf slope to- the top of slope and extend until an acœptable/maintainable slope can be achieved to prevent erosion around the new drainage stnJcture. Alignments of the sidewalk and swale in this location do not allow any alignment changes that will eliminate the need for this type of slope treatment. The total cost for utilizing all 37 CY of sand-œment riprap would total $9,250.00; however, we can make field adjustments to reduce the necessary sand-cement rtprap to 17.4 CY for a total cost of $4,360.00 (see attachment IC'). The field adjustments will allow the Contractor to extend the slope treatment ten (10) feet either side of the headwall In lieu of twenty-five (25) feet. We request that you review the attached information and provide direction concerning acceptance of this recommendation with the owner. VTHJvh . Attachments , . ~ ROADS AIRPORiS c: 0 M MER C I ~.L Mitnli:.. .- 14005 N.W. 18óth Street Hialah, Florida 33018 Phone: (305) 829-')700 F5X: (305) 829-8772 West Palm Beach: 779S Hoccxr Road West Palm 8eac." Ronda 33411 Phone: (561) 79Q.ó46 7 F5X: (561) 7QO.1073 Vero Bach: 5100 29th CcuIt Vero Beach, Fl32967 Phone: (772) 770-3m Fax: (i'72) iiQ..3707 CeniIIcd Gcnn Conrac::cr uansc /IUnœ': CG C011475 -~ '- September 4, 2003 M=. Paul Rhodes ~~odes Eoldings, Inc. 500 S. Australian Ave., Suite 110 West Pal~ Beach, FL 33401 Re: Selvitz Road c.-;C #4861 Dear Paul: \, c.. ,..,¡ -, \1 ~. P~rsuant to our contract agreement, the following is our proposal for additional work on the referenced project: ~&:! 611 DI? &: Fitt:i::.gs T~is pipe is recui=ed 6 ex~st~~g hy¿rants. 150 LF @ $75.00 $11,250.00 ....~ <.-.... facilitate the relocation of the We would appreciate your written direction as soon as possible. Should you have any questions relative to this, please feel free to give me a call. Sincerely I rv~ ~j Robe=t E. Bounds Operations Manager Community Asphalt Corp. - . - :1åPA "Wa~"" Ir2'.':::':'·~: ....-". ~ :1 . ".;:;;~"!-:.. ¡ ctI.....· .. I · . .. . '- """ Consulting Engineers · Land Surveyors 2980 South 25th Street . Ft. Pierce, FL 34981 (772) 464-3537 . Fax (772) 464-9497 www.ct-eng.com Oc.tober 3, 2003 C&T Job No. 02-002 Selvitz Road COlT. .- .- .. FEDEX TO: Mr. Paul Rhodes St. James Golf Club 500 Australian Avenue South Suite 120 West Palm Beach, Florida 33401 RE: Selvitz Road Improvement Project Black Base (Station 2+75 to Station 12+50) Dear Mr. Rhodes: Attached, please find cOITespondence regarding the price proposal from Community Asphalt regarding the substitution of black base in lieu of base rock along the roadway crossing of the FP&L transmission coITÍdor. The total cost for the placement of the black base will result in a net increase to the project cost in the amount of $44,255.60. We have reviewed the price proposal and fmd it to be in line with other local projects. We would recommend that you approved the proposed installation and associated pncmg. Upon notification, we will process the appropriate change order to the contract. A5 always, should you have any questions with regards to this information, please contact me. Sincerely, ERPENING, INC. .'" ...-.....""..._....I'..~~ -....,¡ '-' "WI Consulting Engineers · Land Surveyors 2980 South 25th Street· Ft. Pierce. FL 34981 (772) 464-3537 . Fax (772) 464-9497 www.ct-eng.com Memorandum .. - ..- -- Date: October 1, 2003 To: Mr. Ster Matthes, P.E. .~cb No.: 02-C02WA1 ~rec::r :f ': :ns~ / Sc.."7JldL VI? . ~/ø' From: Mr. Vernon T. Hackett, P.E. ';~it.~. ¿ . . Construction Manager U'4 v //' ~ Cc: File RE: RECOMMENDATION FOR THE SUBSTITUTION OF BLACK BASE - REVISED C& T Project No.: 02-002WA1 Description: Selvit: Road Improvements This memorandum is submitted as a revision to the memorandum previously sent on September 22, 2003 concerning the same referenced recommendation on the Selvitz Road project. Please be advised that the roadway base material quantity and price will not be included in the price submitted by the Contractor for the installation of the black base. Additionally, the Engineer of Record has confirmed that sod will be installed along the stabilized shoulders; therefore, no. black base is recommended under the stabilized shoulders. - If the substitution of black base is approved for use on this project as a replacement for the stabilized subgrade and the base roc!<:, the total increase to the contract amount is $44.255.60. Please provide this revised pricing information to the owner upon review and concurrence. . . ..:..:':~~"'-~ - ¡ ! i - ..!"-- -~ ¡ i ! ¡ .--<- ~. CULPEPPER & TERPENING, INC. 2980 South 25th Street · Fl Pierce, FL 34981 (772) 464-3537 · Fax (772) 464-9497 ,a'l ii' ., I· ¡ \ ¡ ! i I (í!~ ~-+~ I \. i !. ¡ ¡. ¡ I ! ! I ~I .' , l "lLQ.J \ Ji ~~.J i ¡ . ! I I ! i/ I! I \)' ! I /! \\ 7 -'?\/ ),'./1 :' ~ ¿--:>! /, ; 7 { J/ i flW0Á,:5'~ l j ¡ Y ~ ¡ \...: :.:: I,,' ¡ vv'- ! I ¡ Vi 14. ¡ ¡ ~:./\ ~ i , ¡ ¡ i ! ! , ¡ I ¡ ! ! j ¡ I ¡ ¡ i ¡ T7a¡ml c.. ¡Þ~r1 ! ! , I ¡ ¡ i ¡ I ! ; ~ , i j i 1 ¡ ¡ f ¡ ¡ ~ ¡ ! - - i j ! ¡ 4-- t I i ¡ ¡ ¡ 1 j ¡ ¡ ! - - ! t i i ¡ ! ,¡ JOII SHEET NO. ,..., CALCULATED IIY CHECKED SY SCALE L II. ! ¡ I' JJ. ~__~ 1 'f ;'7' c::::; ~f~! ; I .' <: :.'. :!...! :~ 10 I I ¡'jL/I?Þ k :(0 . .. ¿f) , / .i", I r ! j ¡ ¡ ¡ i ¡ ! ; i ¡ ~ j ¡ ~ ¡ ~ i t ! ! ¡ ! ~ ~ ¡ i ~ ¡ ~ ; ¡ i , ¡( GIjÇ9I, iM!lf7~~~é ¡7~ O,J/#Ah-¡r 1,.1/ /1 : 41 ! i - l'!"r ..?Z:71? ¡ ¡ I '7i""'" Æ ¡ ~.+- i ! ¡ I i ¡ ¡ ¡ , 1 ~ ¡ ¡ ¡ 1 ; t 1 1 , ~ ! I I i i I i ! , ! ¡ i i ~ ! ! ¡ ¡ ! ! ¡ ; I ¡ i t ¡ ; ; ¡ ! ¡ I t i i ! I , ! i ~ i , I ¡ I ¡ I ! ! ¡ ¡ i i ¡ ¡ t 1 i I ¡ i i i i i ¡ ¡ I ¡ ! ; ¡ i ! ! ; ! i , ! ¡ I i , , i i ! j ¡ ! ! ¡ ! j ! ~---1. ! ¡ i I ! i : .·1 I 01' DATE DATE ¡ - I ')j ~ t /1 f.v'(! ¡ 1/ I.,. I ~..;:;¿; ~~/4 r'" ¡V¡..,,/ UG/71. . !, .--.J/ ? à <:;1 ~c:i I '11_..2. ,Q. , Á ! 'j.l j ! 1 i /V/ J. ?~~ (.pu, "";"-01. ,.... _ ¡...ì. :) _ I I' ¡ ¡., ~ j i I I i ¡ 1 i i ¡ I ! ! I i I ¡ ! I ¡ i ¡ I i i ~ I I I I I . ! i ¡ ! i ¡ I ; , ! I I i i ; i i i ~ ¡ ¡ I ! ¡ ~ I 1 i I I I ~ i 1 i ! j ~ f ¡ , f i ! i ¡ I , i i I i ~ I I i j ! i i ¡ ! -.,.~.--- ,- .A~ bIfIì ROADS AIRPORTS COMMERCIAL .Mia!:ni: -- 14005 N.W. 186th Street Hialeah, F10rida 33018 Phone: (305) 829..Q700 Fax: (305) 829-8772 West Palm Beach: 7795 Hooper Road West Palm Beach Florida 33411 Phone: (561) 79fM4ó7 Fax: (561) 790-1073 Vera Beach: 5100 29th CQUIt Vv:ro Beach, Fl32967 Phone: (772) 770-3771 Fax: (772) 770-3707 Cenilied GencraJ ComIctor Ucensc Numœ: CG C011475 www.cacorp.nct '- September 29, 2003 Mr. Vernon Hackett, P.E. Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. 2980 S. 25th Street Fort Pierce, FL 34981 Re: Selvitz Roa¿ CAC #4861 Dear Vernon: - . _._-~~- '-' CULPEPPER & TERPENING .- " --:r P T f"'- RML ,/ SKM - Gle EWZ DRH { OLF' . PPF MfO RWB MEB CAK tSTT Pursuant to cur contract agreement with St. James Golf Club, Ltd., the following is our proposal for the typical section revision on the referenced project: Construct 9-1/4R Asphalt Base in lieu of 10" Coquina Base Delete: 10" Coquina Base Add: 9-1/2" Asphalt Base 2666 SY @ $7.25 2666 SY @ $23.85 NET ADDITION ($19,328.50) $63,584.10 $44,25ß·60 Should you have any questions or if I can be of further service, please feel free to call. Sincerely, f\k-£ Robert E. Bounds Operations Manager Community Asphalt Corp. - I RRrRTVRD OCT 0 2 2003 BY; ~ -! ~_I~~ '-'1 SELVITZ ROAD Cost at Right-at-Way .- This cost is estimated has already been credited at $190,758 '_'_.'_ n._._....... _ . """ . . ~ ..J SELVITZ ROAD Engineering Total Category Check # Date Amount Payee . Engineering Wire 11-Feb-00 $5,000.00 Stephen Cooper P. E. 1686 31-May-00 $4,800.00 Stephen Cooper P.E. 1913 11-0ct-00 $2.200.00 Stephen Cooper P. E. 2018 12-Feb-01 $2,200.00 Stephen Cooper P.E. 2306 11-Sep-0 1 $2,472.50 Stephen Cooper P. E. 2359 15-Nov-01 $1,229.50 Stephen Cooper P.E. 2398 19-Dec-01 $860.00 Stephen Cooper P.E. 2466 12-Feb-02 $2,515.00 Stephen Cooper P.E. 2499 20-Mar-02 $1,467.50 Stephen Cooper P. E. 2715 01-Aug-02 $2,250.00 Bridge Design Associates 2717 01-Aug-02 $3,245.00 Stephen Cooper P.E. 2770 12-Aug-02 $63.00 Bridge Design Associates 2787 22-Aug-02 $1,500.00 AM. Engineering 2788 22-Aug-02 $650.00 Sitework Estimating Services 2796 22-Aug-02 $477.65 Culpepper & Terpening 2826 03-Sep-02 $4,652.50 Stephen Cooper P. E. 2901 19-0ct-02 $1,466.00 Stephen Cooper P. E. 2939 12-Nov-02 $1,346.00 Stephen Cooper P.E. 3046 04-Feb-03 $242.50 Stephen Cooper P.E. 3130 25-Mar-03 $1,112.50 Stephen Cooper PE 1523 13-Jun-03 $260.50 Stephen Cooper P.E. 1562 31-Jul-03 $1,004.00 AM. Engineering 1568 07 -Aug-03 $740.00 AM. Engineering 1573 07 -Aug-03 -$217.50 AM. Engineering 1585 28-Aug-03 $1,219.00 AM. Engineering 1617 29-Sep-03 $245.00 AM. Engineering 1632 28-0ct-03 $267.00 AM. Engineering 1638 29-0ct-03 $1,224.00 AM. Engineering 1651 24-Nov-03 $2,250.00 AM. Engineering 1660 24-Nov-03 $51.00 AM. Engineering 1661 24-Nov-03 $290.00 AM. Engineering Proposal $2,900.00 Garrison Frohlich Contract $85.000.00 Culpepper & Terpening, CEI. Engineering Total $135,417.65 \VED "V 561 .16.1 9.19; CULPEPPER & TERPE~ING 04(~6/200J 1;:2~.~ ....,; ~ 002l00J ~;CULPEPPER & ~ 1 _ 'TERPENING, INC. Sendcr'~ Emnll: sm:1tthes@Ct-cI'g.~um Consulting Engineers · Land Surveyors 2980 South 251t1 Stree\ . Ft. Pierce. F!. 34581 (7i2) 464·:3537 . Fax (772) 464-9497 www.CI-eng.c:)m Aþril16. 2003 lob 02-002 Contrac! . . . - þ- -- ~ Mr. Pa.ul R..'1odes President St. lame.s Goif Club. Ltd. 500 Aust'aiian Avenue, So. Suite 110 West Palm Beach, FL 33401-6246 RE: Work Authorization Reque~'1' WA-l: Construction Engineering & Inspection Services - Selvitz Road DC:lI' tvIr. Rhodes: Ba:-¡cci on our discussion regarding the required construction admi.-ùstraìÍon services by the City of Port St. Lucie for the Seivitz Road project. Culpepper & Terpening, Inc. ~s please to submit this Work Authorization for the;: following services: DESCRJPTIQN: Provide the constrUction cnginedng and administration services for the infrastructure improvements to Selvitz Road from Pcachtre::: Boulevard to Manvil1e Drive. The in:fraslTUctUral improvements include the constrUCtion roadway, drninage, signing & marking, pedestrian, 1andscape and lighting improve:nents. SCOPE OF WO~T(: Task 1 & 2 - Construction Services The E:lginc~!' shall provide Constr.Jction Aàministrarion, Resident Field Representation, and CVII::itrucnon Observation. The services shall be for a maximum 8-month duration and include the following: 1. P7-ovide a resident project representative, and a construction manager iUld additionaJ project represe:'ltatives as required, to observe the cons1r\lction work perfonned by the Contractor for all aspects of the project work effort. 2. TIle Enginc=r win attend a pre-construction meeting to answer questions regarding the project prior to commencement 3. Prepare a monthly construction progress report that win be submitted conCtlITen.t with the Contractor's payment draw request. TIle report will include recommendation of payment to the contractor, and denolt: any arcas in which the contractor may be falling behind the proposed construction schedule. 4. Re·tiew and approve shop drawings which are defined for purposes of this Contract as all drawings, diagrams. iHustrations, brochures, schedules and other data prepared by i1 contractor, subcontractor, manufucrurer, supplier, or distributor which illustrates the equipment, material or some portiun of the work to be used during the con~trl.lction of the project. ".ltIv 21Xr.1O~.oo2 . !:~ Jon. SAD_,IG:.œ%w....Semw.:I:l.~uc . . 04/¡S/200J WED 1i:2~L1 561 464 9497 CULPEPPER & TERPENING ..., Ial003/00J S. Review and determine the acc=::ptability of subslitute materia.ls and equipmenl proposed by the Contractor. 6. Conduct an :nspection to detemrine if t.;e work has been completeá by the Contractor in accordance with his cont:':lct agrocment with the Client, and if the Contr:lctor has fi.tlfilled all of his obligations thereunder. The Engineer wi11 make written approval and recommendations to the Client concerning the disposition of fmal payment to the Contractor. -- . '" -- 7. Provide certiilcation oÏ completion to the appropriate jurisdictional agencies. 8. Provide modifications to the construction plal1s as ncc=::ssary to facilitate a..-,y value e:lginee:ing t.~at r:w.y be ini tiated d~.ng the constr.lctiol1 of the proJect. These additional services must be approved by you in the tòrm of a Work Authorization. For your reference, we will invoice the work ~ffort as a "Lump Sum" on a monthly basis and reference it as W A-I in our billing. TIle specific scope of scrvic=::s and cOITesponding prices are as fo)]ows: Item WA-I Construc:ion Administration Se:'V'Ìces . (Based upon a monthly rate of $12,800 for JI1 b month duration) .-\- Co (clC\. IA ""'-f Price S~o ~ -- <;,¡.ç ì/"7.JV --- S~400.00 - TOTAL For our records, please sign this transmittal and fa.x a copy to our office authorizing us to perfonn the above- rcÎerenced scrv1ces. Should you have any questions or comments rCè.'3rdÏng the above inròrmation, please feel JÌ'ee to contact me dir:c'dyat Extens10n 214, or via e-mail at the address 1isted above. Sincerely, Accepted thi.r; of MaJ"ch, 2003 CULPEPPER & TERPENING, INC. St. James Golf Club, Ltd. Stefan K. Matthes, P .E. Senior Vice President I Îf'aul Rhoùes ~""'J-402 . s.. J..... ~AU""'..'tOZoOO2W..1 :iclY1aCllI.d<>c . . " ~2003 FRI 11:15~X ii24685930 Garrison Electric Cnsltn ~ . . c.p..L· nLe ~\ ")0 ( ~A ~f GARRISON. FROHLICH & ASSOCIATES ("~ . t*I .~~~. 'No _ e\4û \~ .- .- .- November 14, 2003 St Andrews Par.< SOO Austraiian South Suite 120 West Palm eeach, FL. 33401 Attn: Paul Rodes Re~ St. James Golf Course - Setvitz Road Extension Cost of Design The ~st for the SeMt::: Road Lighting will be billed on a hourly basis and not to exc~~d s2,900.00. Attached is a rate she~t For your information, piease be aware rates over the wee!<encs is 1 '/2 times 1:;"e hourlY rate from attaé1ed sheet. . Please sic;n this ag~ement and fax bact to 7ï:-.J.68-S930. A retainer fe~ of $1,000.00 cn be mailed to US as soen as pOSSIble. If'you have any Questions please feei f;ee to 011 us. Sincerely, ¢~~£C'~~y-- Peter Frohlich Approved By: I . 4826 SO~ U.S. I . FT. PŒR.Œ, FL 34982 . (772) 466-2500 . FAX (772) 468-5930 WWW.GARRlSONEC.COM Co........,.......,..." ~ LÆ'I'ft&4B.'VIIZ&A.. - . ~ 002/003 - . - ,-..........--.--:-. - '-' ....,¡ SEL VITZ ROAD Survey Total Category Check # Date Amount Payee -- . Survey 1638 5-Apr-00 $2,760.00 Ford Amenteros 2679 3-Jul-02 $427.50 Ford Amenteros 2679 03-Jul-02 $427.50 F-er4-Amenteros 1499 13-May-03 $9,787.50 Laventure 1586 28-Aug-03 $300.00 Metes & Bounds 18-Sep-03 $3,567.50 Metes & Bounds 1599 26-Sep-03 $765.00 Metes & Bounds Survey Total $18,035.00 . -.-.-----.-. ~ . . ~ ....I SELVITZ ROAD Environmental Constultants Category Check # Date Amount Payee .'- . Environmental 2336 15-0ct-01 $2,250.00 RL Weigt Environmental 2368 15-Nov-01 $1,500.00 RL Weigt Environmental 2604 20-May-02 $3,750.00 RL Weigt Environmental 2639 4-Jun-02 $1,125.00 RL Weigt Environmental 2748 1-Aug-02 $1 .250.00 RL Weigt Environmental Environmental Total $9,875.00 . . . '-' ...., SELVITZ ROAD Permits Category Check # Date Amount Payee . Permits 2281 28-Aug-01 $1,000.00 SFWMD 2510 20-Mar-02 $320.00 City of Port St. Lucie 2533 11-Apr-02 $105.00 City of Port St. Lucie 2534 15-Apr-02 $50.00 St. Lucie County Fire District 2571 10-May-02 $150.00 City of Port St. Lucie 2713 16-Jul-02 $150.00 Florida Dept of Environmental Protection Permits 2928 15-Nov-02 $150.00 FL DEP Permits Total $1,925.00 . ~ .. . . . ~ Wetlands Mitigation ...., Credit Reservation and Sales Agreement This Agreement is between Bluefie!d Ranch Mitigation Bank ("BRMB") and St. James Golf Club ("Buyer"). WtiEREAS, Buyer is engaged in, or about to be engaged in, a project on Se!vitz Read in Sf. Lucie County, Florida; .-.::: WHEREAS, as part of the permitting process involving the US Army Corps of Engine'ers ("ACOE"), ACOE has imposed a requirement on Buyer, as a condition to granting Buyer a permit, that certain mitigation efforts be undertaken with respect to impacted wetlands and that federal freshwater mitigation credits maybe-purchased from BRMB to satisfy the wetland mitigation requirements of that permit; and WHEREAS, BRMB is a mitigation bank with freshwater credits available for sale in accordance with ACOE Permit # 200002935 (IP-TA); WHEREAS, BRMB desires to sell credits to Buyer to meet Buyer's needs and Buyer desires to purchase the credits to meet its needs; and WHEREAS, Buyer intends to transfer the credits to the City of Port St. Lucie, F!orida ("City"), or to. use the credits for permits of projects related to it through common ownership ("other qualified permits"); NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants and undertakings herein and good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby expressly acknowledged, it is agreed: 1. That BRMB hereby agrees to sell to Buyer and Buyer hereby agrees to purchase from BRMS one and six-tenths (1.6) federal freshwater herbaceous mitigation credits for its exclusive use as described above, under the terms and conditions contained herein. ~ 2. That Buyer shall pay to BRMB sixty-four theusamtdollars ($64,000) fer the credits, as follows: A. Twelve thousand, eight hundred dollars ($12,800) shall be paid to SRMB as a non-refundable deposit, fully applicable to the total price of the credits, upon execution of this Agreement and no later than April 4, 2003. B. Fifty-one thousand, two hundred dollars ($51,200) shall be paid to BRMB on the earlier to occur of September 30, 2003, or 5 days following the issuance of the permit by ACOE. C. If Buyer does not pay to BRMB the $51,200 in accordance with the terms above, BRMB shall have no further obligation to Buyer and Buyer shall forfeit all rights and claims to its $12,800 deposit. In such event, SRMB has the full right to sell the 1.6 reserved credits to other buyers. . . .' . . -, . 3. That, upon ~ipt of the full purchase price, SRMS shall, within 5 b~ess days, apply to ACOE for the withdrawal of, and transfer to the permit or permits designated by Buyer in accordance with the terms of this Agreement, 1.6 federal freshwater herbaceous credits under SRMS's permit, in substantially the same manner as presented in Exhibit A, attached hereto. 4. That, upon release of the credits by ACOE, those credits shall be conveyed by BRMB to Buyer, or other qualified permits, free of all liens, encumbrances and restrictions oñ Buyer. The parties agree that conclusive evidence of the credits being transferred shall be thé receipt by 8RMB of the fully-executed Minor Modification (Exhibit A). - - 5. That Buyer shall not sell or otherwise transfer the credits, except to City for its Sel~itz Road project, or to an entity or project controlled by Paul Rhodes. 6. That Buyer~ is responsible for, and shall pay, if applicable, any state sales tax, documentary stamps or other costs or taxes associated with the transfer-and/or ownership of these credits under laws now in effect or later enacted which would apply to this transaction. BRMB is responsible for its own income taxes, if any, associated with this transaction. 7. That Buyer will not disclose the terms of this Agreement, except as required by law. 8. That, if any suit or action shall be instituted to enforce or to interpret this Agreement, the pre'laiiing party shall be entitled to recover from the non-prevaiiing party all costs and reasonable attorneys' fees and costs incurred in any trial, p'-;st judgement or appellate proceedings. Venue for such action shall be in S1. Lucie County, Florida. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Agreement below: SELLER Blue~nc~ ~iiJ?tion Bank ~_L ~(r ^ David McÌhtosh, Irustee ' Bluefield Ranch Mitigation Bank Trust j/3l[0) BUYER st.þes Golf CIU~ Aúthorized Signature - Date ? A- I.. . '{L-H" 1)(; 5 Printed/typed name ¡Ñ/) . Title ~ 11., I / 01 Date . . . . \r ~ EXHIBIT A BLUEFIELD RANCH MITIGATION BANK 7932 Flagler Court South West Palm Beach, Florida 33405 Telephone (561) 355-3900 Fax (561) 7112-1422 _,2003 .- . . Ms. Tori White 218 SW Atlanta Avenue Stuart, FL 34994-2034 .. Subject: 81uefield Ranch Mitigation Bank ("SRMS") Army Corps Permit # 200002935 (IP-TA) Minor Modification for Withdrawal of Credits Dear Ms. White: Pursuant to the terms of the above Permit, aRMB hereby requests a Minor Modification to effect the withdrawal and transfer of mitigation credits from our bank, as follows: Transferee: The City of Port St. Lucie, Fiorida (or other designee) Permit number of transferee project: ACOE # 200203476 (IP-AAZ) (or other qualified permits) Authorization date of transferee project: As determined by USACOE Authorizing agency: US Army Corps of Engineers Number of credits transferred: One and six-tenths (1.6) Type of credits transferred: Freshwater herbaceous Acreage of wetlands impact offset: 1.78 acres contiguous and 0.53 acres isolated (or as appropriate to other qualified permits) . .. . ... . .... . Ms. Tori Wh'-' _,2003 Page Two "'" Credits available at the Bank: Balance per last Modification letter (Date) This transfer After this transfer Forested XX.XX (1.6) XX.XX Herbaceous Total XX.XX XX.XX XX.XX (1.6} XX.XX XX:~ -- .- Kindly acknowledge your consent to the transfer by your signature below. Please return a copy of the executed acknowledgment to the undersigned at your earliest convenience. Should you have any questions on any of the above, or need any further information, please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned. Very truly yours, David McIntosh, Trustee BLUEFIELD RANCH MITIGATION BANK TRANSFER ACKNOWLEDGED AND AGREED: US Army Corps of Engineers Authorized signature Printed/typed name Title . . '.. . . '-' Accent landscape ""'" 1640 Copenhaver Road Fon Pierce, FL 34945 Phone 772-429-2321 Fax 772-429·2322 August 07, 2003 St. Andrews Business Park, Inc. 500 Australian Avenue So., Suite 110 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 . Contract We propose to provide all material, equipment, labor and supervision to install the landscape for The Selvitz Road Landscape project, as per the Plans and Specifications drawn by Houston Cuozzo Group, dated Revised 2/28/03 sheets 1 through 7. All plant material shall be warranted for a period of One (1) year ITom the date of installation as per specifications. Contractor has been made aware of the time sensativity of this project and has agreed to have material purchased and ready to be installed when site becomes available for planting. Contractor agrees to start planting operations within three (3) days of notification ITom the owner that the site is ready and to proceed with the work. The time period for completion of the work is four (4) Days ITom the date started. Owner agrees to a deposit of Fifty per cent of the contract price for the advance purchase of this material so the time conditions can be meet as requested. The total cost of this installation shall be Twenty Five Thousand One Hundred Ninety Six Dollars and Twenty Five Cents, ($25,196.25). S~re: I St. Andrews Business Park, Inc. Signature: bt£#:~ Accent Landscape Date: Date: 1-7-oJ .. . ' '-' ....." .' ACCENT LANDSCAPE 1640 Copenhaver Road Fort Pierce, FL 34945 772-429-2321 772-429-2322 (FAX) Selvitz Road Landscape Plan Plans drwn by Houston Couzzo Group, Inc. PlanPages 1 - 7, dated Revised 2/28/03 Otv. . Name Specifications Unit Total 20 Quercus Virginiana lO'hgt.,4-6' spr., 1.5" Cal. $148.75 $2,975.00 24 Acer Rubrum 10'hgt.,4-6' spr., 1.5" Cal. $148.75 $3,570.00 24 Quercus Laurifolia 10'hgt.,4-6' spr., 1.5" Cal. $148.75 $3,570.00 23 Ulmus Parvifolia 10'hgt.,4-6' spr., 1.5" Cal. $148.75 $3,421.25 76 Sabal Palmetto 8-12' CT $115.00 $8,740.00 15 Cu. Yds. of Mulch $28.00 $420.00 (1) Year of watering Per Achitects specifications $2,500.00 Total Proposal = $25,196.25 Note: All trees to be warranteed for a period of One (1) year fÌ"om date of installation. - - I/WE find the above proposal acceptable and hereby authorize you to proceed with the work as outlined Payment will be made as stated: Authorized Signature: Date: . - - ...---_. --.. S>ep.25 OJ 12:49p\'" Scot.~ L. St.ef'an .~ --~ ~ IT U .... ~ II V f I I I 56 1 - 6 ~ 1 - 5:3 O"!!J F'. 1 FLORID~L\ COAST LIGHTING, lJ.~C. S~pte:nber 15,1003 lvfr. Paul R.io¿es St. :1..ndre'.vs P::lrk 500 Aus'U':li:m Ave:me Suite 1 10 West Palm Be:lch. FL 33J.O 1 ,,- Re: Sere:! Lg!1ting ?:-opos<li I::e:lr?vfr. P....'cd=::~ F!orida Coast Lighting, Inc. is pie:lSe¿ ~o proviåc your ofÍic:: with our proposal to furnish srr::::t light poles. fi."ffiU"cs. lamps ar..å c::mc:::te foundaï:ions for your project. Our proposal is b3Sed on furcishing the ~and.:3rå pole assembly as utiliz:¿ in l.a.c City Of POlL St. Lucie with e:::c:prion to provisions for banners. Our proposal incluåes ail material as inåic:lted on our quotation #000ï1301 àated Septcmber 2:, :003. Florida C"as. :'ig~ting, Inc. propose ~o :ltrnish ail material as sr:m:d !II our quctar:on as rerèrred. to ,¡bove, including saies rax rèr the sum of ONE HUNDRED SEV'ENTEEi'f Tl~OíjSrL'fD TR.."tEE EUNDRED E:GHTY DOLL.-L~S .A.I.'ID SIXTEEN CENTS. (S117,.330.16). Upon acc::ptaIlc:: OÌ-::h1S ?TOPC:¡al we will ¡,,~uir= a t.'".:IT'f ~erc=:lt (30%) deposit for .:)råc: :mry ($35,:14.00). P-:y ~ci:eduie wii1 thc:l ce as foilows: . Dellve:"'f or' con~:c bases (S 1 0,176.00) / .Jhm'AfI. .'~ -. Oråe: r::láy to leave fuc:oT'¡ re::-. .ai~g balanc:: of$i1.,990.16 A ~LI vi. ..os ",-. p t:.. cot- Iv . . L~ghts to be £\H'!U3h.ðd & il'i3 aIled' by Decemb~r 19 2003 Should you find this ~roposal acc:pcztbic. pic:lSC s¡g!1 be!ow and maiJ ana !3X a sjgrled copy 'Nit!l a 30% åe!,osir Òedc of THIRTY FIVE THOUSAND nvo HUNDRED FOtJRTEEN DOLL.-L~S AND NO CEL"ilS (S35,214.00) to Florida Coast Lighting, . "0"'0 ~ h ~-th.. S· _01.... , ~11 L ,- ~- 1'- ~. sal·- .-J fa lnc."+ ~ ",QU! )/ -,",.ve. wte.:. ~.l..J.Ke vvort.l¡.l""!" ,),)"H)". J..iJ1Spropo ISO!Icrlõ.¿ r .:1.5 days 1Ï'om cbÌS proposal åalt:. Offc:e¿ by: AF~: N --. I p~ O~ I I ame: Llt.e ~ ~ P.O.Nurnbe: ~NI'~) JAfr" ~ ~ '1_1 .¿"( ¿I cJ~M;U ----- F!oriàa Coa::.~ Lg..i-¡ting,lnc.'¡ Scott L. Ster:m V.P. I . Ph; 561-6~1-5301 . Fa."C 561-641-5302 . Ph: 305-858-3434 · Fax: 305-858-3435 Palm Be:u:n: 4020 S. 57Ù1 Ave, Suite 201, Lake Worth. FL 33463 D:.de: 1300 COï.l1 Way, Suite 300, M.i.ami. FL 33145 ..... . . '. .. ~ SELVITZ ROAD Two Transformers and Meters for Pedestrian Lighting -- This cost is estimated at $20,000 '. ....." . . -~ , .. . . t .. ~ .- Selvitz Road Pedestrian Lighting Based on Budget by Florida Coast Lighting Labor to install pre-cast foundation Labor to install pole Labor to install and wire fixture Labor to pull wire Material cost of wire Material cost of splice boxes Material cost of cabinets Labor to install splice boxes Labor to install cabinets & make connections Total cost of pedestrian lighting installation .....¡ $14,400 $7,200 $4,800 $7,000 $2,500 $4,080 $6,400 $3,360 $2.000 . $51,740 . , .." .. . t .. '--' ....J FLORIDA COAST LIGHTING, INC. November 4, 2003 Paul Rhodes President - St. James Golf Club 500 Australian Ave. So. Suite 120 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Selvitz Road Lighting .. Dear Mr. Rhodes, This letter is written to confirm your released order for forty-eight (48) pole assemblies as manutàctured from Spring City Manufacturing Company. The pole assemblies will be utilized for pedestrian lighting for the Selvitz Road project at The Saint James Club in Port St. Lucie, Florida. Along with your order in the amount of$117,380.16 we have received your check in the amount of$35,214.00 as a deposit tòr material with the remaining $82,166.16 balance to be paid as follows: . Delivery of pre-cast foundations- Estimated shipping date week ending December 5th, 2003- Amount to be paid is $10,176.00 . Remaining balance when order ready to leave factory- Estimated shipping date week ending December 19, 2003- Amount to be paid $71,990.16 Additionally, we have prepared a budget for the installation of the pole assemblies in order to complete this project. Budget is as follows: · Labor cost to auger hole and install pre-cast concrete foundation= $300.00 each x 48= $14,400.00 · Labor cost to install pole on foundation= $150.00 x 48= $7,200.00 · Labor cost to install fixture on pole and make wiring connections= $100.00 x 48= $4,800.00 -.. · Labor cost to pull wire in existing conduit= Lot price $7,000.00 · Material costs ofwiring= Lot price $2,500.00 · Material costs of (48) in-ground splice boxes = $85.00 each x 48= $4,080.00 · Material costs of(2) cabinets for panel boards= $3,200.00 each x 2= $6,400.00 · Labor cost to install splice boxes = $70.00 x 48= $3,360.00 · Labor cost to install cabinets and make circuit breaker connections= $1,000.00 x 2= $2,000.00 Again, thank you for your order. We will keep you informed of the shipping dates as the estimated dates get closer. Palm Beach: 4020 S. 571h Ave, Suite 201, Lake Worth, FL 33463 · Ph: 561-641-5301 · Fax: 561-641-5302 Dade: 7035A SW 47th Street, Miami, FL 33155 · Ph: 305-66\)-4210 · Fax: 305-666-4211 "Y I . , - FLÒRIDA COAST LIGHTINt1, INC. Should you require any additional informatio~ please telephone our Lake Worth office at 561-641-5301. ~ .f}!rIti/Je) Scott 1. Ste~l"<-" V.P "F'íõñda Coast Lighting, Inc. .. Palm Beach: 4020 S. 57dt Ave, Suite 201, Lake Worth, FL 33463 · Ph: 561-641-5301 · Fax: 561-641-5302 Dade: 7035A SW 47th Street, Miami, FL 33155 · Ph: 305-666L4210 · Fax: 305-666-4211 ~ To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Agenda Request Item N~er ((. ~ Date: 01/06/04 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ X ] [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ Board of County Commissioners Public Works Request of Atlantic Truss Company for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the project to be known as Atlantic Truss Company - Major Site Plan. The developer of Atlantic Truss Company to be located on 13.06 acres of land on the east side of King's Highway, is requesting that the Board grant relief from the requirements of Section 11.02. 09(A)(5) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 11.02.09(A)(5)(a) requires that all site plans ten acres or greater in size, include as a part of the site plan review process, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The purpose of the EIR is to assess the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environmental conditions. The Board of County Commissioners may grant relief from the requirements for the filing of this report upon the demonstration by the developer that the information being foregone by such relief is not needed in order to determine the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environment. The proposed Atlantic Truss Company is located on previously cleared citrus groves. There are no significant environmental features on the subject property. N/A None Staff recommends that this request for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) be approved and that no environmental impact report be required (on.this project. r-Yl COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED D DENIED c=J OTHER Approved 5-0 County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator LXY \~ ß~' /' Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: d-- Other: (~ \k~\t)~M) ~.. . .. ...... '-" '.. ..." Commission Review: January 6, 2004 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Environmental Resources Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Environmental Resources Manager DATE: January 6, 2004 Request of Atlantic Truss Company for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A}(5}, St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the project to be known as Atlantic Truss Company - Major Site Plan. The developer of Atlantic Truss Company to be located on 13.06 acres of land on the east side of King's Highway, is requesting that the Board grant relief from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A}(5} of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 11.02.09(A}(5}(a} requires that all site plans ten acres or greater in size, include as a part of the site plan review process, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The purpose of the EIR is to assess the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environmental conditions. The Board of County Commissioners may grant relief from the requirements for the filing of this report upon the demonstration by the developer that the information being foregone by such relief is not needed in order to determine the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environment. SUBJECT: The proposed Raptor II Minor Site Plan is located on previously cleared citrus groves. There are no significant environmental features on the subject property. Staff recommends that this request for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A}(5} be approved and that no environmental impact report be required for this project. ~ura: \ )[~ Vanessa Bessey Environmental Resources Manager cc: Doug Anderson, County Administrator Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney Ray Wazny, Public Works Director Dennis J. Murphy, Community Development Director Thomas Lucido & Associates, Inc. ~ ..,j .... ITEM NO. C-6B DATE: January 6, 2004 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): ENGINEERING DIVISION (4115) Michael V. Powley, P. County Engineer SUBJECT: Equipment Purchase - Budget Amendment 04-119. Request permission to upgrade the AutoCad software for our Division and purchase a printer for tre MSBU program. BACKGROUND: Savings in the equipment account in the amount of $4,764 from the purchase of two pickup trucks and the Engineering shared printer will be used for the purchase of the AutoCad software and the MSBU printer. The requested funds in the amount of $1,510 will be transferred from the Office Supply-Computer account to accommodate the requested purchase of the Land Desktop Upgrade. FUNDS AVAilABLE: AutoCad Software Upgrades (Qty. 4)- $3,184- EQ04-225 Land Desktop Upgrade (Qty 1) $1,116- EQ04-226 Printer for the MSBU Section (Qty. 1)- $1,510 - EQ04-227 Funds are available in the Engineering Division's Operating Account - Equipment 101-4115-564000-400, and funds will be made available in the Engineering Division's Operating Account- Software 101-4115-568000-400. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Budget Amendment 04-119 to transf r funds into proper expenditure accounts. COMMISSION ACTION: lXJ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER Approved 5-0 [x] County Attorney [ ] Project. Manager y [x] Mgt. & Budget ( [x] Budget &Rev. Coor. [x] ERD AcA ¡, 0",,;0";0' D,pt. P"6)iJ A " ~ [x] Purchasing Dept. [ ] Road & Bridge (Check for copy only, if applicable) DEC 2 6 '-' ...".¡ BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: OMS/Engineering PREPARED DATE: 12/22/03 AGENDA DATE: 1/6/04 TO: 1 0 1-411 5-568000-400 Software $4,300 FROM: 101-4115-551501-400 1 01-4115-564000-400 $1,116 $3,184 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: Autocad Software U rade and Land Deskto U rade. CONTINGENCY BALANCE: THIS AMENDMENT: REMAINING BALANCE: N/A N/A N/A DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: BA04-119 tn 0::: W~ Zo O~ - I tn('l) tno :¡§~ :!Eo::: 0« ow ~ ~~ z « ~ :J0cØ' O~~ o LL ª LL 0::: ~ o Ow C LL!;;: 0::: I- C «tn~ o Wz m :J ~ O<t. ~W zO::: :JI- OZ OW W:!E _D- O- :J:J ...JO W ¡..: tn '-" .~ '0 "ro c: (t '0 (t ~~(]) (]) c:(t:ã :g ~5>~ = 0 (]) g.~ ~ Ü<t. == (]) ïii (t _.Qc: .!!! .ð'¡ ~ 1;) 8 -.:t..c::-::J_ 0- 0 E (t o OJ cn cn C\lc:ô~(]) c:'õt>sê .Q ~ (]) ~ (]) ~ ~ cn (]).!:2 ~::J2£~ (t~~J!J!!1 .+oJ C "¡: c..> "- (t(])a.::JL.. £cn(])'8::J 'O~..c::L..S (])a.-a. .!!! cn £ '0 ~ ~ .;: '§ ~ ~ (t.9(])¡j3e C:U:ãU::J (])(]):¡::¡:::a. (]) cn (t L.. .Q(])a.::J.9 (]) ro E S (]) 1õ .E; 8 5 1õ ..c:: a. (]) o..c:: (])(]).Q = ~ ¡:: 0 I1Ì '§ - OJ (]) c::i.,.; §.5 == o U .- == ..: o .g .!!! (t (t C\I 0 .~ -t; ~ (])L..0'O oa.OJL..x .5 Q> c: 8 (]) ~ B'~ (]).:: UOQ:)L..:¡::¡ .g 5 .5 -g § eog>(t(]) a.t W cn cn L..O c:a. ï¡¡ a. ~ .!!! .!!! ..c::a._a.cn "':J,-~... 'Ocnoou (])L......cn::J -g ~ ro .!!2 '8 L.. c: .- a. L.. OJo-c:oa. a.-(])UL.. ::JOcn-::J _c:cnj9o 0_ (]).-- c: = cn .QJ ..!!! cn == .- '0 (]) ~~::: ~== L.. ..c:: I1Ì c: ~ 0- (]) (t cn -g§ª'5<1Ï(]) (]) 0 .- x E cn >cn16(]):¡::¡¡j3 5 ro ¡ij- -g .!!! ~ O£U(t£(]) o o -.:t , o o o co CD It) , It) .... .... -.:t , .... o .... ~ Z ::J o () ~ It) C\I C\I , -.:t o o W :it a w 0:: I- Z W :æ Q. ::J a w ~ ..." '0 (1) c:: ~ ro_ o c5 .- 0 = '0 """ :J (1) I ro c:: 0 en .... 0 0 '0._ 0 ~ »- . 00 .c:: c:: (J) (1) (1) CD W "lit ¿E~ 1.0 I Z 0 .Q » (1) 1.0 0 - - a. ...... 0 ro (J) x ...... N 1::: :J (1) """ o.Q _ I - I ...... en M a.> (1) 0 (J)<1),C ...... en 0 c:: .... ro ro a. .... - 0 .Þ (J) (1) :æ: N :>,<~ :æ: (1) . c:: ~ ~ (J) 0 ~ :J § U 0 « II) .- ..... (1) :!: ro Z (.) W '0 ¡g .... :) > .2 a. ffi 0 ~ g 0 ~ () ..J """ ~ 0 .- < X « 0 o ü (1) Z N - 0 c:: :J (.)«i 0-- <:JU 0 en~ Ü<-S - III .9'E¡: (.) U. :J :J ro a. c: <'0(1) U. ~~ - ¡¡¡.... o .- 0 0 (l)1i)c W (1) .... (1) u. !;( .... :J (1) C :JO.c:: --- ~ l- e ffi 0 (1) < - (1) (J) « en '0 c:: ro e (¡¡0'5 0 WZ '0 (1) .... m :Jw c:: '0 :J a~ ro ro a. ~ êij OJ.9 W (1) a. (1) .c:: :J > ~ -»ro Z (J)"ë.c:: (1) 0- :J I- '0 = ro==~ 0 Z OJ~(1) W a.(1)~ (.) :æ: ~~<1Î W (¡¡ . (J) a.. ~(J)a. - - ro (.) - 0- :J 000 :J (I)::..... a '0 c:: (1) ..J (1) (1) (J) W .~ E a¡ ~ -a.u ro 0 .- CD ë3 ã) ::: N en (1) > :J N a. (1) 0 I ~ '0 ~ """ 0 .- (1) 0 0 .c:: -- I- ëñ 1ii w :it 0 W D:: I- Z W ~ D.. :) 0 W en 0::: W~ Zo 00 _N enM eno :ë~ ::Eo::: O<C OW ~ ~~ z <C ~ :J 0 cØ Oen~ O - I1S LL ª LL 0::: ~ o Ow C LL ~ 0::: I- C <cen~ o Wz m :J ~ ~ ß< zO::: :JI- OZ OW W::E _D. 0- :J:J ..JO .W I- en ~ ..."" o ~ ..... Q) .!Q ~ ~ (¡)a5 ~..c +J"O'-ro:t: .§ § .ê >- ~ a.a.«~ê Q) (/) ...... 0 u Q) Q) ..... .- ~~E~'ê °u:¡::¡.....Q) >-_....Q)a. :50$~0 "9 ~ .5 ......, 5 'E~5.~0 ~ E .!Q :: Õ c:::J (/)0 >- coc:::5....u (¡jQ)0$a¡ .... C> I C::.- ::J L.. = "t: U oJ!!coa.~ c:: (/) E .... Q) coQ)Q)J!!Q) :S ·š ¡ß 'E :S (/)o-..c::ëjjQ) .g~::co~ .~ ~ 0 _ Q) ... '- c: 0 L- .5 0 0 (/) u 5. ~ :¡::¡ Q) .5 L.. .: ~ E c: Q) Q) 0.= co c>..c::E.ou ....l-ocoQ) J!! ug.~ C)s...:L..(.) .5 ~ .E Q) 10 'C >-~..c:::S c::(/)u..... co .- Q) C> Q) ..c:: :S c:: c:: .~ _0 = ~ .~ §, ....;:Q)o Q) c:: 0'- ]5:J.oðj:rl co (/) Q) .... .... a.Õ..c::'OQ) co 'S: I- c:: ~ u.o.co. êi>0!!!ë~ ëQ)Q)Q)~ .¡: E c:: E 0 a.o~t:: co:rl~~-~ (/).ot::Q)Q) ~_Q)'OC:: .- 0 a. I- 0 :JC::o_;::: g:25.Q)« ....'O'O:SQ) EUQ)..c::..c:: ~æt5;o;:~ C> c:: ~ ~ .- e en co .!Q g> 0.:.2 0 :S .- :::>1-..... '0 CC .'Og>a¡ (/')~~ëjjE . ~.oCO(/)Eêi> Q)~EGoë ..c:: co Q) en u .- l-u.o'5~5. o o "'" I o o o "'" to LO I LO ...... ...... "'" I ...... o ...... ~ Z :J o (,) ~ r-- N N I "'" o o w :it o w IX: I- Z W :æ: D.. :J o W t/) 0::: W~ Zc o~ - I t/)M t/)C i~ :Eo::: 0« ow » I-..J z « "t ::JO~ o t/) !:2 o iL ~ LL 0::: w o O~ CLL« 0::: I- ~ « t/) ~ o W « m::J >0 I-W zO::: ::JI- OZ OW W:E -Q. 0- ::J::J ..JO .W l- t/) '--' .""" g 5 ~ .- .g ~ ~ c¡.... .... c: ~ ~ ð>' ï:: 0 .g J: Q)Q) . Q) - III III c: .5 c¡ <II g g>.5 -5 IIIllI~"" -Q)~ð.. <IIJ:"O £-"0.9 "055Q) c:.....u> <II-Q)<II Q) .~ .... J: :ë'E"O= Q) c: .- ~ III <II ~ <II III III Q) > Q) c: ~ <II III ~ _ .!!! :.::: a. ffi -.....Q) C!; .0>- Ollllll~ N ~.~ ~ c: == g. c: .Q .g u = ~ o.-'E Q)<II.!!!~ >u(5)Q) <IIO'õ~ iií~Q)<II J:() c¡- ~ ..... c:: rn ~ ëõ ~ Ü III£U~ .- x "0 ~g>Q)e <II .- "0 a. c:-gC:5 Q) .... <II 0 Q) ~"O_ .o~m~ Q)>-....Q) ¡:;~c:~ J:~~::: ~ III Q) . >~~Q) 0._ E o III <II+:; 0'- J: III o ..... -+oJ._ ~, .9 0 J: '" U 111- Q)Q)....iií U III 0 .5 Q) Ü ~ III_Q)"O Ü ~ III <II ~ .¡;;: Q) .... "0 a. iií ~ e Q) > ~ a. J: .¡;;: Q) ....1-0..0 ëõ .Q)-QÌ £ü£~ê "O,ª£EQ) Q) 0 .- a. "O....~~x ~o.Q)oQ) c¡....-..... Q) a.~:§~:ë ~-<IIQ)<II _ 0 o.J: ....Q) o....E- C:~0.J!3:2 III 0 U U III <IIt::Q),ªÕ ::8..oou oo.o5.iií "O~- C:lllc:"01II ~ Q) .Q s¡ s¡ .... c¡.~ ~ ~ ~ c: .- U U 0.20== o o "<t , o o o co co 1.0 I 1.0 ..- ..- "t , ..- o ..- :it I- Z :J o U U « U) N N I "t <:) a w ð w It:: I- Z w ::E a.. :5 a w tn £X: W~ ze o~ - I tnM tne :E~ :E£X: O<c OW ~~ z <C ~ o ::J 0 ëD O tn e -.... o u. 0 u. £X: w o O~ Cu.<c £X: I- ~ <co f3 ~ ::J<C mO >W !Z£X: ::JI- OZ OW W:E -Q. 0- ::J::J ...JO .W I- tn '--" ,- ..,,¡II - e: Q)= E .- 0.3: o Q) Qj 3: > - Q) Q) "0 I/) a. Q) ro -- ïñ 0 "O~ e: I/) ro e: .~ ~ :;::: ro .... .... :J "0 0 >-3: ..c:_ 0 e:= o ro ~ Q) ro 3: 5~ a. 1/)"0 e: Q) ro e: .... 0 - .- -- >-e: Q) Q) ~ E :J >- 1/)- Q) I/) "0 5 :J .- - > U Q) e: .... .- a. .9 I/) . o<cg¡ <c . e: ü I/) Q) oso. '5:e~ <C I/) Q) _0_ o o.,D I/) 0 ~ ~<C~ :J Ü .- - 0 I/) ro_e: ~~8 "0"0- ro .... ro "0 ro .... e: "0 ro ro e: Q) _ro>- I/)(¡x Q) .... Q) £:Je: 1/)0_ Q) _ U "Oo:J roQ)"O .... e: e OJoo. o.Q)Q) :J ~ .... Q) OJ ._ ~~c ro OJ Q) ~o.Q) ¢:::J..c: o >-_ I/) - Q) "0 e: I/) Q) 0 ro N::..c: :æ3:~ .- Q) :J ~>o. a.> 0 I/) .- I/) I/) Q) .- õ > ..c: 0 ro I-_..c: o o "i o o o co <D 1.0 I 1.0 ....- ....- "<t I ....- o ~ z :;:) o () () <c CD N N , ~ o a w ð w £t:: I- Z w :E 11. :;:) a w en ~ W'IIt Zo o~ - I enM eno -0 :iN :i~ 0« OW >->- t-..J Z « "It :JO~ oene o ¡¡: ~ LL ~ w o o~ C LL « ~ t- ~ «en~ OW « m:J >-0 t-W Z~ :Jt- OZ OW W:i _C- O- :J:J ..JO .W t- en "-'" ~ .... :g0)~ "O..co "01-(/).... æuiÆð C"""':=1oI- (/)ê:ë° .- 3: (\ >. ~oo.g . >- ~ .!!1 0)1:0)0 :BO)..cij: (\ 0._ 0) o.e ClO) (\o.c..c o "0 '§ - .!!! $ .!!1 g¡ (¡¡ ~ ã> (\ ë:a=....~ 'C (\ -g g 0. E (\ .- ~"O_c ij:..!!!¡¡¡~ o 'ffi E 0) .?;-E1:3: :JO)(\- "9.cg-~ "00"0- ....-I-Q) ~ ~ -.!:1 C C 0) C ~O)£g> (/)"O..c0 ::; § ~ ~ oo.3:Q) C :ß .!!! 3: (\ ......c _ .,C"""'.....Q) -OClO (/)ocij: .g õ '21 0 .~ (/) :J (/) ë (¡¡ 0 ->. 'C .c (/) 0) o.E'õE (¡¡ê(¡¡i1 e>Q)~« ]! CI 0) Clroaj..c :§~E~ "0 0) :¡:¡ .- C .!:: (¡¡ g> ~5-ë'õ Õ ~.~ ¡¡¡ ..!!! ~ (/) E .c 0 .- E (\ 3: $ 8 0. .... :J ~ '(v 9 ~ ......c=O) 0) I- (\ .... ë . E (\ 'C .... 0) >. o.m(/)Q) (\ >.Q)£ ø£........: (/) .- .... (\ 0) .~ £ 0 £ ë :J = C 0) 'C C" ë .2 0. 0. ~:JQ).?;-3: E(/)'ã.O)O) (\ ð E £ C .... .- 0 (\ g>~oõ£ '- 0 ..... '- .- o.Q).E23: :) E .::¿ .5 ê ffi 8 ~ C..2 0:::: 0) C .... - OO:::.c..!!!~~ .ê õ 15 .~ ~ I-C.c(/)O o o "f o o o '<t CD LO I LO ..... ..... "f ..... o ..... ~ z ::) o (.) (.) « r-- N N I "It o a w :it a w 0::: I- Z W ~ Q. :5 a w .." ~ """'" ITEM NO. C- 6c DATE: January 6, 2004 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): ENGINEERING DIVISION (4115) Michael V. Powley, P.E. County Engineer SUBJECT: Approve Change Order NO.1 in the amount of $64,302.46 for modification to the Midway Road and Glades Cut-Off Road Intersection Improvements and Midway I Glades Cut-Off Road Utilities Extension - Phase 1A projects. Construction of the projects is presently underway. I n order to facilitate construction activities some modification to the plans were made (see attached memorandum from American Consulting Engineers). In addition to the modifications outlined on the memorandum, a directional bore in lieu of an open cut utility installation is proposed across Midway Road. These modifications will facilitate construction, alleviate some delays to the traveling public, and reduce the contract time by 5 days. BACKGROUND: On June 6, 2003 bids were opened for the Midway Road and Glades Cut-Off Road Intersection Improvements and Midway I Glades Cut-Off Road Utilities Extension - Phase 1A. One Thousand and Ninety companies were notified, 42 sets of bid documents were distributed and four (4) bids were received. The low bidder was Community Asphalt Corp. in the amount of $5,028,653.61. All work will be coordinated and inspected by American Consulting Engineers. FUNDS AVAilABLE: ROADWAY PORTION: Funds will be made available in 315-4115-563000-410045 County Building Fund, Engineering - Public Works in the amount of $51,095. UTILITY PORTION: Funds are available in 315-3600-563000-36214 County Building Fund - Water Sewer Service in the amount of $13,208. PREVIOUS ACTION: On June 24, 2003, the Board approved award of the contract to Community Asphalt Corp. in the amount of $5,028,653.61. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve and authorize the Chairman to sign Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $64,302.46 for a total contract price of $5,092,956.07 to Community Asphalt Corp. for modific . n to the plans. Approved 5-0 .J COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED[ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER ~ Do sAnderson County Administrator [x] County Attorney ~/ Ix] Project. Manager ~ CiY 1-1 [x] Road & Bridg;! '6 ~ ....I American Consulting Engineers of Florida, LLC 4141 Bandy Boulevard, Unit B11 Ft. Pierce, Florida 34981 Tel 772.465.3909 . Fax 772.465.4259 american@ace-fla.com . www.ace-fla.com MEMORANDUM Date: 11/25/03 To: Craig Hauschild From: Bob Valentine Subject: Midway / Glades Change Order #1 Below is a description of the reasons for the items in Change Order #1. 1. Modifications to Drainage West of Glades Cut-Off - were necessary to avoid conflicts with the existing water and force main. 2. #57 Stone for Trench at NW Corner - The abatement trench conflicts with a private drain field. In order to minimize dewatering in the trenches we will use #57 stone as necessary. It is anticipated to be from 6 inches below to 6 inches above the drainage, force main, and water. 3. Signal Head Auxiliaries - Changed from Steel to Aluminum at the request of the County Traffic Department. 4. Prestressed Concrete Pole - The plans indicated to keep the existing service location. However, the pole that the service was installed on needed to be removed to install the force main. A new installation is therefore necessary. 5. Concrete pipe Culv 48" RCP, Concrete Collars, FEC Flagman - The plans indicated to install manholes at the end of an existing twin 48" pipe. The existing pipes were installed side by side with no gap in between. It was therefore necessary to install additional pipe with concrete collars in order to have room to install the proposed manholes. Please contact me if you require further information. Copies to: File American Project No.: 5009785.001 "A Culture of Engineering Excellence" '~.)' \~~~; '-' ....¡ .' :HANGE ORDER ;T. LUCIE COUNTY 'ROJECT: Midway Rd. & Glades Cut-off Rd. Intersection name, address) Improvements CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1 INITIATION DATE: 12/22/03 ro (Contractor): CONSULTANT'S PROJECT NO.: N/A :ommunity Asphalt Corp. 14005 N.W. 186 St. iialeah, FL 33018 ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONTRACT NO: C03-06-451 CONTRACT DATE: 6/24/03 'ou are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: (Additional sheet attached as Exhibit A - Yes) SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A "he original (Contract Sum) was .......................................................... ..................... ............................................ $5,028,653.61 ~et change by previous authorized Change orders .............................................................................................................$ -0- "he (Contract Sum) prior to this Change Order was ............................................................................................. $5,028,653.61 -he (Contract Sum) will be (increased) on this Change Order........... .......... ......... ........ ........................ ................ ................................................... .......... ..... $64,302.46 'he new (Contract Sum) including this Change Order will be......................·....·......·....·..........·..........··............·.. $5,092,956.07 "he Contract Time will be (decreased) by ..................................................................................................................( 5) Days 'he Date .of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is: 1/6/05 :unds Available: Account Number 315-4115-599330-410045 "he adjustment in Contract Price and/or Contract Time stated in this Change Order shall comprise the total price and/or time adjustment due or owed he Contractor for the work or changes defined in this Change Order. By executing this Change Order, the Contractor acknowledges and agrees that he stipulated price and/or time adjustments include the costs and delays for all work contained in the Change Order, including costs and delays Issociated with the interruption of schedules, extended overheads, delay, and cumulative impacts or ripple effect on all other non-affected work Inder this Contract. Signing of the Change Order constitutes full and mutual accord and satisfaction for the adjustment in contract price or time as a esult of increases or decreases in costs and time of peñormance caused directly and indirectly from the Change Order, subject to the current scope If the entire work as set forth in the Contract Documents. Acceptance of this waiver constitutes an agreement between the County and Contractor ; 1aUhe Change Order represents an equitable adjustment to the Contract, and that Contractor will waive all rights to file a claim on this Change )rder after it is properly executed. All work peñormed under this Change Order shall be peñormed in accordance with the contract specifications. Recommended: St. Lucie County. EnQineerinQ Division Architect/Engineer 2300 VirQinia Ave.. Fort Pierce. FL 34982 Address .. ;/. ~ ~/ .Lt' . d J:+:"':/~~Ç'. ..""- .......~/. By: Craig Háuschild, P.E., Sr. Proj. Engr. Approved: St. Lucie County. Public Works St. Lucie County Department 2300 Virainia AYe.. Fort Pierce. FL 34982 Address 12/22/03 Date By: Donald B. West, P.E.. PIW Dir. Date Agreed To: Authorized: St. Lucie County: 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Community Asehalt Core. Contractor By: Date 14005 NW 186 St.. Hialeah. FL 33018 Address Approved as to Form and Correctness County Attorney By: Date - - c: CD E ~ ~ ~ ¡- c.;; E æ ;.< c: "" o .. u CD II) ~ CD - c: "C ns o 0::: II: o I - :::J o II) CD "C ..! C) "C c: ns ;; "Co:: ns w o C £3::0:: :>.0 ns w ~ C) "C~ .- J: :!!Eu tí ... 'õ' ... Q., ... is ..c. 0. '" ~M ~g ï:: N ::J . '" E ~ ~ E >-0 8~1l? Qj ro o '0 Q) f¡ ~ e¡:: csQ.- u.E~ ~ Q) .2 c~:5 o 0 '0 üZ~ ....... Q) u 'C Cl. Š o ... Q) u 'C Cl. ... 'ë ::J L() o o N cD 2:- ro ::J ¡:: ro ..., ~ .¡;¡ C III P .J L11 Qj iú o ¡:: o ~ ã. E o ü .!! 'ë ::J III e ~ I en o f- r-- L() en E e - := o I :; C ü .2 '" ...~ . ,9- ro ;Z oë3ch III - 0 ~ ~ f- "'C") ~:h Q) . CI~ III co C . 'iü en a~ CIa cco ~ch ::J :0,...: ~L() ~ r-- .;, N ~ E AI :: '0 ãi r-- .... o a:I o ,...: ~ r-- .... o a:I o. r-- ~ ~ en ...J ~ r-- co <0 N 0). ~ .... OOONOa:lOOO)OM L()OO~~N""O~Na:I <OOONcxiM<ólriNMr-: NOOL()MCO....COr--NCO O~O....a:lL()....N~o)a:I Ñ ...: Ñ ...: cD ri ....- Ll'i a:I- Ñ - <r- ""-"..... ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ o ~ cri N OOON L()OO~ lriOON r--OOL() COr--N~ 00 OL() '<ir-- N~ L()N a:Ia:I <ÓO 00') ....C") ri .... NOO') a:I~~ irioN L()~r-- ~- a:I .... ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~ ~ r-- r-- o L() o ~ 00 C")~........CO~N~ , ....~~ Na:I ~ .... Z o f- IIII Ia:: üüüüu.ü=>u.en>-Z ~~~~...J~o...J...JenO WWWW WI f- N NNNNNMML()L()~.... ..10: U e - o '" Q) ..c. u .5 co ........ að ........ ~ õð -- ~ íñ~ p ]§~ ~ iXi :ß éñ ::J '" ,o";;;........1D Q) Q)'W ... ........ '0 Q.iñ~:rl ro.2 E~::::",ð 8 g ::JQ) Q)==- ¡::Q.j¡¡¢::Q. Eç" 'E ã:i > L() ü ï:: M .22ð~a:: C'...... ~~¿õëc e:ß~ "''''enQ.~ ~-gu .91 .91 .91 2 i is 'õ O¡:: Ìii Ìii Ìii Q) > .5 ¡:: c ===u'3 rooc,ü ŠŠŠ§ü~ E'fiÇ"~ ~~~ü~Jg¡::2ee.iS '0 '0 '0 '0 .- 0 roE ~ ë5 ~ .g, ro ro ro Q) Q. U >... ro en ~~~ ~22 g'ü21D~ ---eeeU:>~Men rororo-UU Q.>' Q) §'§,§,:ß ¡:: ¡::ü. . ü 0. .- .- .- ... 0 0 W to co ID >. enenenQ.ÜÜu.....~~f- t;~~~~~~ ~~ ~"7~~~N6 ~;;; 0')0')0')""~C")r-- L()C") L() L() L() ~ ~ " a:I cococo"'!"eg; N ;Z~~L() ...... ... Q) ¡:: ... o Ü ~ Z roO' "5 '':: CoD Q)~ .= êi) ...== 01;::: ~ .5 ¡::'o E~ en 0. r-- ro ~ ~ ~ ~ r-- e M L() ...." co ~ N o C") ..¡ co ~ is Õ f- '" ë Q) E Q) > o a. .Ë ¡:: '" .2 ë 13 Q) Q) E ~ Q) Q) ~ 'E a. '0 E ~ ro ¡:: ¡:: 0 0 Q) a:: ._ E:s:r 13 Q)OQ) U) > I f!? 'E~'S.! AI c.U c EE",-;: AI-Q)Q) >-O"O.x e ~.!!!.5 0. a::: C) a:: .Ë:=oðað a!9a!a! §o:;oo '';:: a:: ü a:: a:: ,g. ~ :ß ~ ~ :ß u~'o~~:';:: :ß:g..!!!:2:g~ Q~C9~~=> ro e....NM~L() ~ ..... . .--..- .~ "" ...., ITEM NO. C6d DATE: 1/6/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONSENT: ( X ) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): PUBLIC WORKS - ROAD DEPT. SUBJECT: Conditional Acceptance of Prima Vista Blvd. Extension BACKGROUND: As part of the approval for the construction of the Pine Lakes Apartments (FKA Pine Summit Apartments), the applicant was required to extend Prima Vista Blvd. to the east from the entrance to the shopping center east to,"*,e entrance to the apartments. At this time, the construction is complete and the applicant is requesting Conditional Acceptance of the improvements by the County. The County Engineer has inspected the improvements and at this time is recommending conditional acceptance by the Board for the extension of Prima Vista Blvd. Due to the inability by the Contractor for this construction to coordinate with the testing firm retained by the County, the maintenance agreement will be for a period of three (3) years and expire on January 6th,2007. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: NIA RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board conditionally accept the extension of Prima Vista Blvd. and Authorize the Chair to sign the attached Maintenance Agreement. COMMISSION ACTION: X APPROVED DENIED OTHER: Approved (5-0) o gl Anderson County Administrator 181 Originating Dept: (Pub. WkS'/~ 181 County Attorney. -- /I . . Management and BUdget'~~ amenta. Land., . --....... o Finance: 181 Other Community Development Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at (561) 462-1777 or TDD (561) 462-1428 at least forty-eight (48) hours prior to the meeting. - - -...I ~. . ...... "'" St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Application for Servin~ on County Boards and Committees Thank you for applying for a position on one of St. Lucie County's many advisory boards and committees. The minimum requirements for committee membership are: · Must be a County resident · Must not be related to another committee member, County Commissioner or County employee involved with the committee of interest. · Must not be employed by the same business entity as other committee members. · Must not serve on more than 2 County committees Note: Some committees have additional requirements; please inquire when submitting this application. In addition, service on committees with planning, zoning or natural resources responsibilities may require disclosure of financial interests. Please complete the following information: 1. Please indicate the committee(s) you are interested in. See the list below. llíj';'7Ð{'1 2. Name: (~f:DR-6t;.. E.vt¿¡.2sotJ Phone: 1f:f.e4- -toGò 3. Home address: ;;r3 -r 6 J f;JJJ ¡ C-A ~ e.cA]) ~í PIE/Lee.. FL '5 't~ c.f5 4. Which commission district do you live in? S. Business/Occupation 57. L~CI t:.. t't}v:Jl'( Fitt V¡Sl"tt\ (;.T - CÅ PiAl tJ - ntL ?íZfvt:NTéct0 .., i . 6. Business address: ').I.{CO ;2-Nöj/t:.. j...~ LAN D -4v'é- F-DfL-r ?I(::~é 3<.{ 95ö 7. 8. Do you currently serve on a county committee(s)? If so, please list: 9. Why do you think you are qualified to serve on the committee(s) indicated? Yf~ ,. ~, ~ . ;;;...~ ...... ...,¡ 10. Would you consider serving on another board other than the one(s) stated above? (Please specify) 11. Comments: SIGNATUR~~ DATE: 1~/'3¡ I ö3 St. Lucie County Advisory Boards and Committee Citizen Appointments Available Please check the committees you are interested in: .., ¡ . n Beach Preservation Task Force W Board of Adjustment n Central Florida Foreign-Trade Zone, Inc. n Children's Services Council n Citizen's Budget Development Committee n Code Enforcement Board n Community Development Block Grant Citizen's Advisory Task Force n Contractors Certification Board n Cultural Affairs Council n Emergency Medical Services Advisory Council n Environmental Hearing Board n FI. Dept. of Children and Family Services Committee District 15 n FI. Dept. of Children and Family Services Nominating Qualifications Review Committee District 15 n Fort Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee n Historical Commission n Housing Finance Authority n Investment Committee n Library Advisory Board n Planning & Zoning Commission/Local Planning Agency n Restudy Coordination Committee n St. Lucie County Recreation Advisory Board n Tourist Development Council n Treasure Coast Health Council, Inc. n Treasure Coast Regional Economic District/Overall Economic Development Program Committee n Vegetation Protection Committee APPLICATION WILL REMAIN EFFECTIVE FOR ONE YEAR Submit to: St. Lucie County Administrator's Office, Missy Stiadle 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Phone: (772) 462-1156 2 AGENDA REQUEST ...., ITEM NO. 71 DATE: January 6, 2004 REGU LAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [X] TO: Board of County Commissioners '\ t1 erson, County Administrator SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Administration SUBJECT: Board of Adjustment Appointment BACKGROUND: Commissioner Lewis has requested that Mr. Buddy Emerson serve as her appointee on the Board of Adjustment. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/ A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board ratify Commissioner Lewis's appointment of Mr. Buddy Emerson to the Board of Adjustment. COMMISSION ACTION: E: ptGA.PPROVED [] DENIED [] OTH ER: Approved 5-0 Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget: Originating Dept: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Purchasing: Other: Effective: 5/96 .~ , \. ""'" PARKS & RECREATION DEPARTMENT FAIRWINDS GOLF COURSE MEMORANDUM FROM: Edward Parker, Purchasing Director ,~/ Timothy Coolican, Golf Course Manager (~ December 15, 2003 TO: DATE: RE: Golf Ball Retrieval Bid 04-008 I have reviewed the above referenced Bid and contacted the references provided regarding this vendor. I am satisfied with the information provided therefore, please schedule for Board of County Commission approval to accept Birdie Golf Ball Company bid for golf ball retrieval from the lakes at Fairwinds Golf Course. Thank you. . , , \. '-' tJ) 0:= co wo ZO O~ -0 tJ):t:t: ~~e z~Œi w ~ ::>~I tJ) a. 0°..... 0:: 0 oOw ::> M . . w~w 0 N _ ::I: 0 (§) oztJ) u. ::>::>z ..J M ..JO 0 0 '00 0 ..... - " N tJ)u.!« tn It) 0..J C 0:= e::> z w o:=cc ~ m ~~ ~ <i: w cc > u. 0 ~ Z ..J ~ ~ c w tJ) æ w I- Z W W C 0:= tJ) W ..J 0:= ~ ..J ::> « ° . . c m 0 w u. u. Z ..J ..J W 0 ° a. " C) ° !« e tJ) w tJ) ..J « ..J « ::I: m 0 u. 0:= ..J ::> ° a. C) w e m c w ~ - ::I: m tJ) ~ w ~ tJ) tJ) ..J « w ..J m 0:= « ~ m u. ..J ..J Ow « ::> C)O a w ..J ~ ::I: " « a. C) 0:= Z « -«°0 ::I: ::I: ¡:: M 00-' e~ °oe.... ~z«« . 0 0 0:= ..J 0 ..J e « z m w u. > ..J..J ou. C)w w~ -C) en:: ~« m:æ: ..",,¡ co "r"'" "r"'" N ('I') i< e w I- :) m i< D:: e .... w ~ ü: e ~ tI) 0 l- e z z w tI) w > w :æ: jjj z :) (J « (J w E 0 0::: a.. e 0 :æ: tI) 0 0 e e ~ n:s (J m m - I/) LL U. LL "C 0 0 0 c: 0::: 0::: 0::: n:s E w w w Q) m m m "C :æ: :æ: :æ: J.. :) :J :) Q) z z Z i< -~ '-' '-.II ITEM NO. C - 8A DATE: 1/6/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker. Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Bid #04-008, Golf Ball Retrieval Services. BACKGROUND: On December 15, 2003, Bid #04-008 was opened for Golf Ball Retrieval Services. Three hundred and twenty-eight (328) vendors were notified, one (1) bid document was distributed and one (1) response was received. Staff recommends award to Birdie Golf Ball Co. who will provide 6000 high quality rewashed golf balls at no charge. Any additional balls may be purchased at $.30 a piece. FUNDS AVAilABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid #04-008 Golf Ball Retrieval Services to Birdie Golf Ball Co., and authorization for the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: E: (X) APPROVED () DENIED ( ) OTHER Approved 5-0 D ANDERSON COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Coordi nation/Sia natures County Attorney ( X ) ~/ . Mgt. & Budget ( ) Other ( ) Purchasing (X) at Originating Dept. ( ) Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable) ---'----- ..." ITEM NO. C- 8B DATE: 1/6/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Permission to advertise Invitation for Bid for Dollman Park Riverside (West) Parking Lot. BACKGROUND: To solicit bids from firms to construct a parking lot at Dollman Park Riverside (West). FUNDS AVAilABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for the request for permission to advertise Invitation for Bid for Dollman Park Riverside (West) Parking Lot. COMMISSION ACTION: (X) APPROVED () DENIED ( ) OTHER Approved 5-0 ~NDERSON TY ADMINISTRATOR Coordi natio n/Sianatures County Attorney ( X) 7 Mgt. & Budget ( ) Other ( ) Purchasing (X) af Originating Dept. ( ) Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable)_ é; ~~ '-' .."", MEMORANDUM DEPARTMENT OF CENTRAL SERVICES TO: Ed Parker, Purchasing Director FROM: , Don McLam, Assistant Director Central Service~ DATE: December 22, 2003 SUBJECT: Dollman Park Riverside (West) **~**~************************************************************************ ;-.~- ("'.-; ~-' ; ;::.... ,.-'- ¡,J ~ Z c::\ C-Re~sti$ that on January 6, 2004 the Purchasing Department take to the BOCC a request to \:~ ~fidvërtize4br bid DoHman Park Riverside (West). :' _ N :.:.: ...' .~ C'l .~.... !~ ~tnc~ed~! Section 00300 Bid Form from Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. the engineering firm ".~ ~~e ~ed ~draw and oversee this project. We have ordered fifteen (15) sets of plans and should be hêat b)D1anuary 6th. ¡"........... (""'"0;1 Sent in Bid information by computer. .. .',.,~ (t"\ )- (Y"'. ._ ¿, z ::::> ~-, '...-' W ~ ._- >.......+ ',.. "," ..,., -...." - " t ,1 ,C"-.! '-' C""<J C,...) "-,..., ==~ ~ -2. ("''', \0- ç~: (.I") c=::;ì ,-- -.... . ,,-_:; <,..:-n'.- ,.....'..-' --.,,+ =:~\ ..., ITEM NO. C - BC DATE: 1/6/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Second Extension to Contract No. C01-01-266 with Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley, Architects and Associates, P.A. BACKGROUND: On January 9, 2001 the Board of County Commissioners approved a two-year contract through January 9, 2003 with Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley, Architects and Associates, P.A. to provide continuing professional architectural services. The contract allows for two (2) additional one- year extensions at the same terms and conditions. Staff is now recommending that the Board authorize the second extension. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: On January 14, 2003 the Board of County Commissioners approved the first extension. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the second extension to the contract with Edlund, Dritenbas, Binkley, Architects a nd Associates, P.A. a nd a uthorization for the Chairman to sign the extension as prepared by the County Attorney. ( X APPROVED ( ) OTHER ( ) DENIED Approved 5-0 COMMISSION ACTION: DOUG NDERSON COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Coordi nation/Sia natures County Attorney ( X) Originating Dept. ( ) >- Mgt. & Budget ( Other ( ) Purchasing (X) dll Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable) _ '-' ..., SECOND EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY AND ARCHITECT FOR CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES CONTRACT C01-01-266 THIS SECOND EXTENSION, is made and entered into this _ day of , 200_, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (the "County"), and EDLUND, DRITENBAS, BINKLEY, ARCHITECTS AND ASSOCIATES, P.A. (the "Architect"). WHEREAS, on 9 January 2001, the County and the Architect entered in to an Agreement (the "Agreement") whereby the Architect agreed to provide continuing professional architectural services; and WHEREAS, on 14 January 2003, the County and Architect executed the First Extension to the Agreement, extending the terms of the Agreement through and including 8 January 2003; and WHEREAS, the County and Architect now agree to exercise the second of the two one-year renewal options. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premises and the mutual benefits that will accrue to the County and Architect by extending the Agreement, the Agreement term is hereby extended through and including 8 January 2005 on the same terms and conditions including but not limited to the Architect's fees. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County and the Architect have accepted, made and executed this Agreement upon the terms and conditions above stated. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA DEPUTY CLERK By: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUN1Y ATTORNEY WITNESSES: EDLUND, DRITENBAS, BINKLEY, ARCHITECTS AND ASSOCIATES, P.A. By: Print name: Title: G:\A ITY\AGREE:MN1\edlund.ext2.doc Maryann Collins - Edlund,~t~nbas Architects C¿ntract #C01-01-266 continui~gprofession~ì~hitectural services Page 1 From: Ken Hall To: Collins, Maryann Date: Monday, December 08, 2003 8:26:49 AM Subject: Edlund, Dritenbas Architects Contract #C01-01-266 continuing professional architectural services The completion date for the first of two, 1 year extensions for Contract #C01-01-266 is January 04, 2004. Central Services staff requests that the Board approves the second one year extension for Edlund & Dritenbas Contract #C01-01-266 for continuing professional architectural services. Thank you Ken Hall, Project Manager ext 1434 cc: Don McLam ...." ITEM NO. C- 8D DATE: 1/6/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Second Extension to Contract No. C01-01-292 with REG Architects, Inc. BACKGROUND: On January 9, 2001 the Board of County Commissioners approved a two-year contract through January 9, 2003 with REG Architects, Inc to provide continuing professional architectural services. The contract allows for two (2) additional one-year extensions at the same terms and conditions. Staff is now recommending that the Board authorize the second extension. FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: On January 14, 2003 the Board of County Commissioners approved the first extension. I RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the second extension to the contract with REG Architects, Inc and authorization for t he Chairman to sign t he extension as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: (~ APPROVED () DENIED ( ) OTHER Approved 5-0 E: DO ANDERSON COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR Coordi nation/Sianatures County Attorney (X) Originating Dept. ( ) ;kr Mgt. & Budget ( } Other ( ) Purchasing (X) pr Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable)_ ~ ....., SECOND EXTENSION TO JANUARY 9, 2001 CONTRACT THIS SECOND EXTENSION made this day of , 2003, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida (County) and REG ARCHITECTS, INC., or his, its or their successors, executors, administrators and assigns (Architect). WHEREAS, on January 9, 2001 the parties entered into a Agreement Between County and Architect (the "Agreement") whereby the Architect agreed to provided continuing professional architectural services; and WHEREAS, on January 14, 2003 the parties executed the First Extension to the Contract extending the terms of the contract through and including January 8, 2004; and WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to exercise the second of the two one-year renewal options. NOW, THEREFORE, inconsideration of the premises and the mutual benefits which will accrue to the parties hereto in extending the Agreement, the term of the Agreement is hereby extended through and including January 8, 2005 on the same terms and conditions. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County has hereunto subscribed and the Consultant has affixed his, its, or their names, or name, and the date aforesaid. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA By: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY 1 WITNESSES ~ ...." REG ARCHITECTS, INC. By: AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE Print Name: Title: 2 i Doc 17 D3 12, 3\.,. Central Services 772 462....",,44 p. 1 ::::'-'::::=:;~W::~:=T.;":::7;::.:;:~=:;:;:;:~:':7:;:-;-:~·::~:::':':¡:=~:::~':) BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CENTRAL SERVICES ~-,===.::~~:~::·~:-::-.':¡:-:7.'~::·:-_7·.··:....:~~. :~:¡;-:, ::::-::::7.:.~"~ ROGER A SHINN DIREGOr, December 17, 2003 Ed Parker, Director Purchasing Dept. Dear Ed: This letter is to serve as a request for Purchasing to prepare an agenda to go before the BOCC for approval on Sole Source Procurement for: JWC Environmental Wastewater Screening Facility (Auger Monster) Model No. ALD 32DO-285 Cost: $48, 500.00 Justification for this request is as follows; JWC Environmental is the only manufacturer and service provider ofthe Auger Monster, please see attached letter. Sincerely, G--r c-~~ Roger A. Shinn Director Central Services JOHN D. ßr\UHN. Disrricr No.1· DOUG COWARD, Dislrier No, 2 . PAULA A. LEWIS, Disrricr No..3 . Fr\ANNIE HUTCHINSON, DistriCt No. 4. . CLIFF ßAf\NES, Disrricr No.5 Counry AdminisTrOTor - Douglos M. Anderson 2.300 Virginia Avenue · Forr Pierce, FL .34952 · Phone (772) 462-14.32 FAX (772) 462-1444 · TOD (772) 462-1428 ..., ITEM NO. C- BE DATE: 1/6/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Bid Waiver and sole source vendor contract with JWC Environmental for the purchase of an Auger Monster and parts. BACKGROUND: JWC Environmental is the sole provider, manufacturer and service for the Auger Monster, and it's spare parts. The Central Services Department requests permission to declare JWC Environmental a sole source vendor for the purchase of the Auger monster and parts. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Account #316-1940-5'2000-1527' County Capital Fund/Building/Rock Road Jail Improvements. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the request for bid waiver and declare JWC Environmental a sole vendor for the Auger Monster and parts. (}Q APPROVED ( ) OTHER ( ) DENIED Approved 5-0 CE: COMMISSION ACTION: Coordination/Sig natures County Attorney (X) p~/ Mgt. & Budget. (X) Ífl/J -1nf!!;;¡ Other ( ) Purchasing (X) dr Originating Dept. ( ) Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable)_ Dec 17 03 12:3~ ê Central Services 772 462 ....,;(:4: : l. p.2 3. JUSnr1CA1 f)N t=OR sou: SOU~ PI!Oa.JIð"D« Based upon the Purchasing Manual, the proposed procurement described below is being procured pursuant to the guidelines on Sole Source Procurement. A good faith review of available Sources has been made and there is only one source for the required supply, S€fY'ices or construction item. 1. We propose to procure the following: '~~~+~~O-f<r ~~l'€-eJ't~ ..~ J¡t~ {aUjer r)~n . No. A .~:l. -::> 8 . . ./ 2. As a sole source pr~urement f~om: .. , ( -,- Name of Company: ~ W~ Ef\u ¡ronfvH:fl+atl fAru Høtyl.;J().JO-}-Lnc.. Contact name:~ Sh¥Ue.r. Phone5fol-ll'7-t.¡O'lr-¡ crl1~Lf L~ CJ./1 ch e.r 'j{)'{ - ¿' - l ð Yo The basis for this sole source detèrmination and the reason no other vendor is suitable is: ~Wê ~~"'~ ~7n ~~c.~r . - d S- c: Î _ . J ·sr-on..J,. {ÜL~~ --5€Æ D::ifu...r j, ed' -e--/le.r . .. x- 7-~o~ Date CV-enfrcLI r-~rU{Lr~ Department/Division ~~~ ~thorized Signature Nots: , fnter àe3criplion 01 goads or services to I» procured. 2. e"ter name Dr sole source contraçting. 3. Enter 1he determill\1tJon and bas~ for sc:~ source procurement 4. Attach 30Ie sourc.e fêtter trom venCQr and department. S_ Attach PI1JXI3ë1 from vendor with pricing Ce J{ I íJ.4.l &/Z V Iu....~ JJ J !l.t-c.h^-, Title Agt!;;:pproved ( PURCHASING DIRECTOR ) grIll/OJ DATE n-r.-IO,,2C<:O Central Services ~72 4~? ~4 p.3 -...,n::. 'eLl t)::J Dec 17 03 12:3~ :·£t~:;: :3 ,JWC E.nvJronmenta/ 290 Paularino Ave. Costa Mesa. CA 92S2ß Tel: 800-331-2277 T et 949-B33-388B Fax: 949-833-ð858 .L~· . iii JWC EnwiraI...... =~1:07 TeI:~ Tel; 11...ø.111f1J Fax:71~751-B120 QUOTATION #20494 St. Lude County Correctional Cent~r QUOTEDAT.E: Jwe .REP: SPEC. SECTION: StiBMJITALS: SWP EQUIPMENT: 12-O8"()3 Heyw:¡rd-FL None specified 4-ó weelcs after receipt of order 10-12 weeks after approval/release BID DATE: CONTAcr: TEIt\tS: PRICING: FREIGHT: N/A Ron Schup1er Net 30 days Valid for 60 days Included, FOB Sallla Ana, CA We Jhank you for your inquiry and are pleased 10 quote pricing and delivery on the equipment lisled below. This quotation i,r subjut 10 the terms fmIi C011dltions listed on the JWC Environmental "Terms and Ccmiition.r" page, and an com11tClts and nons listed below. vi One (1) Model ALe 1800 Auger Monster nt system suitable for up 10 J 200 gprn willi downstrt:am wuter.lcvels on the: nmge of 10" to J 2" and solids discharge nom.inally 48" above the top of channel (refer to J we Enviromnental Auger Monster Evaluatioo for additionaJ performance data). Scope: of supply to inclUde: ~. A..'vtA.18oo auger, 45D inclination, 304 stainless steel trough & casings, W· perforated screen, 4000 mm transport segment, bottom d1scbMge, 12" nominal alloy-steel spira! wilh nylon brush. 160: I speed reducer, 2 hp TEFC 46Ov/3 ph/60Hz electric motor, stainless steel spray wash with manual & explosion-proofbrooze solenoid valves · Frame aOO supPOrt components fabricated in 304 stainless steel · PC2231 motor controller in a N EMA 4X FRP enclosure accepting 4óOv/3pb/60Hz input power. includes IEC starters with over-current protecticm. jam-sensing current transfonners. micro-PLC, operatcr Interface and discrete ultrasonic tran:!lducer . · One (1) bagger assembly · 9 Operation and MBintenaace manuals -.------.-.--- Tob) Quoted Price: 111~ ~OO. II! "(;1 Comments and ExcepdoDJ: 1. See attached flow curve &. in3ta1laHon guidelines. 2. Standard one year wamuJ.ty is included. 3. See attached standard JWC Tenns and Conditions ofPurcha.se. 4. One (I) day of start-up supervision by a factory-authorized representative is included ~. One (1) day ofstart-up SUPcrvis..iOll by factory represeDtatÌve is included. 6. One (1) day of follow-up inspection by a &ctory-authorized representative: is included. - Unless specificaUy stated above, this quotation does not include insfallatioo, any ~es, disconnect switches anchor bolts, hydraulic fluid, mounting fÏ'ames, sp~ parts, or special tools. ' Authoriud JWe Signature: Jerrv Withey Inside Technical SaJes '-'" ...,,¡ a J~C:: ~ Environmental - 4485 Commerce Drive Suite J09 Buford, GA 30518 TEL {170) 925-7376 (BOO) 331-8783 FAX (770) 925-9406 Date: June 4, 2003 To: Clyde Hissong St. Lucie County Fax; 772-462-1818 RE: Sole Source Supplier Dear Mr. Hissong, This is to advise that JWC Environmental! Disposable Waste Systems® is the sole provider, manufacturer and servicer of the Auger Monster®, and its' spare parts. All repairing of the grinders for the Eastern Region is performed at our Buford, Georgia facility. All repairing of the grinders for the Western Region is performed at our Santa Ana, California facility. All parts may be ordered through the Eastern or Western Service Center, however, in most cases, the parts will be shipped to you from our manufacturing facilities in California. If you have any questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to contact me at the above telephone or fax numbers. Sincere'}? ,,/ . "'~ { ../L/ I Warre own Eastern Region Service Manager Please note our correct address, phone & fax numbers above. J E-mail: warrenb@jwce.com y ':-ROM ,: HEYWARD., [;-, c. He~.ä,J¡£! FAX NO. :5614474570 ...,¡' Aug. 08 2003 07:25RM Pi 415 COUNTRY CLUB DRIVE WINTER PARK, FL. 32789-2903 PHONE: 407~·1880 FAX: .w7-62ð-98BO 7300 W. CAMINO REAL SUITE 219 BOCA RATON, A. 33433 PHONE: 56'-447~7 FAX: 581-447-4570 Date: To: From: Pages: Friday, August 08, 2003 St. Lucie County Jerry Parenteau Phone: [1] 772-462-2567 Fax: [1] 772-462-1444 Heyward Ron Shupler Phone: 561 - 447 - 4047 Fax: 561 - 447 - 4570 1 Subject: JWC Environmental AugerMonster Screen Jerry: Confirming our conversation, Heyward, IDe. is the exclusive representative for the JWC Environmental AugerMoDster product in the State of Florida. Any purchase of this equipment would come through my office. The actual purchase order would be made out to JWC Environmental and should be addressed as foUows: JWC Environmental C/O Heyward Ine. 7300 W. Camino Real, # 219 Boca Raton, FL 33433 If you have any questions or need additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. Ron Shupler f!!L- 'SERVING THE SOUTHEAST SINCE 1905" P.O. BOX 1607 MAAlAHNA, FL 32447-5607 PHONE: 850-~14 FAX: 850-BN-8826 "," '-' ""'" ITEM NO. C - 8F DATE: 1/6/04 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Bid #04-013, Purchase of One (1) Vibratory Soil Compactor with Smooth Drum. BACKGROUND: On December 8,2003, Bid #04-013 was opened for Purchase of One (1) Vibratory Soil Compactor with Smooth Drum. One hundred and ninety-six (196) vendors were notified, twenty- two (22) bid documents were distributed and ten (10) responses were received. Staff recommends award to the third lowest bidder Nortax Equipment Co which submitted the lowest responsive and responsible bid meeting specifications for total amount of $72,344.44 and approval of the budgeted amount for Equipment Request #EQ04-160. (See attached) The additional funds are available from savings on previously purchased equipment this year. FUNDS AVAilABLE: Account #101-4108-564000-400 . Transportation Trust, Road & Bridge Drainage. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid#04-013 - Purchase of One (1) Vibratory Soil Compactor with Smooth Drum to the lowest responsive and responsible bidder, Nortax Equipment Co. for total amount of $72,344.44, and approval of the budgeted amount for Equipment Request #EQ04-160. (~ APPROVED ( ) OTHER ( ) DENIED Approved 5-0 NDERSON TY ADMINISTRATOR COMMISSION ACTION: County Attorney ( X ) ,% Mgt. & Budget ( Other ( ) Purchasing (X) ¿jf Originating Dept. ( ) Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable)_ '-' "'" Page 1 of 1 Edward Parker - Award of Bid #04-013 Vibratory Soil Compactor From: To: Date: Subject: CC: Dewey Hudman Parker, Edward 12/12/2003 11:23 AM Award of Bid #04-013 Vibratory Soil Compactor Gordon Joyner; Herring, Scott; Pauley, Donald -_...--_..._-..------ _._._~_.__.___._.__..__. ,.__,.____. 0_' .._~...__..__..__.._ __.___..__~__~_ Don Pauley and I have reviewed the bid responses and are making the following recommendation. The lowest bidder was GS Equipment @$66,350.00. He indicated compliance in all specifications. After reviewing his attached equipment specifications, we found the Compactor has a 4 cylinder engine and not the 6 cylinder in the bid specs. He did not meet our specifications. Second lowest bidder was Briggs Equipment. He stated that he had a 4 cylinder engine and did not meet our specifications. Their bid was $66,791.00. The third lowest bidder was Nortrax Equipment at $69,444.44. He met all of the specifications. It is our opinion that this is the lowest most responsible bidder and has met all of the specifications. In Nortracx's bid there was an option for an extended warranty for $2,900.00. This would cover the power train and hydraulics for 5 years/7500 hrs. We propose to add this option to the bid for a total of $72,344.44. Our equipment request (EQ04-160) was budgeted for $70,000. The additional funds are available from savings on previous purchased equipment this year. I have attached a revised copy of the equipment request to include with the agenda item. Please prepare an agenda item to award this to Nortrax Equipment company for $72,344.44 and to approve the budgeted amount for this equipment request. If you need any thing else, please feel free to contact me. Thanks. Dewey Hudman Asst. Road & Bridge Mgr. 772-462-2802 file://C:\Documents%20and%20Settings\ParkerE\Local%20Settings\ Temp\GW} 0000 I.H... 12/12/2003 ~ I ,.., 0 - ()"o :J ro "0 e "0 .... 0 () 0 0 "0- "<t () (/) I 0 UJ ()c 0 c () 0 ~ .!a E "<t .... () CD W ..q- L{) () .: I Z 0 = :J 00 o 0'" 0 0 0 .... () ..- N (/) .... "<t .- C I - I £; 0 ..- tJ) M '+- :.¡:::; 0 o U ..- UJ 0 _ ro - 0 c a. :E () E N E 0 :E ~ () U U..c :it 0 « ~ U I- a.ro Z U W () () .... .... ::> >- () 0 0 >- ..c- O 1-"0 .... ..J () ~ .(/) z « Q) :J :J U = () 0.0 0 tJ) 0:::"0 - ~'S U 11. o 0 10 ~ 11. ~ ....- .0 C 0 0 .- () ;:'E C 11. ..- a. 0) .- 0) :J ~ .... NO'" I () « tJ) o (/) 0 W ~:c :J 0:::1- OJ 0... ...: 0 -() >- X= W () 0 .... 0::: .... ~ 0> Z (\') c 0):;:; :J .... 0) .!a ..- X 0 Z ro () W () () U u..c :E ro:: W CiO a. () c - .:: .Q U - :J :':: -+oJ :J ~ '6 c 0 _ c .Q ..J CO- W () u g . E"o.... .... a.Ct) 0 UJ ·5 ro c CD O'"()o ..- () 0> U I (/) ro () "<t 0 .- () (/) a ..c..cro 1-_.0 llJ :it 0 w ~ I- Z W :æ: a.. ::> 0 w I , '-" ,>- ""'" ~ / ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS TABULATION SHEET· BID #04-013 PURCHASE OF ONE (1) VIBRATORY SOIL COMPACTOR WITH SMOOTH DRUM ROAD & BRIDGE OPENED: MONDAY, DECEMBER 8, 2003 DELIVERY TIME MAKE AND MODEL PROPOSED (CALENDAR DAYS) TOTAL AMOUNT G.S. EQUIPMENT DAVIE, FL SAKAI SV505 30 $66,350.00 BRIGGS EQUIPMENT S. RIVIERA BEACH, FL HAMM 3412 STOCK - 30 $66,791.00 NORTRAX EQUIPMENT, CO. WPB, FL BOMAG BW 211D-3 30-45 $69,444.44 MR. LIFT TRUCK. INC. MIAMI, FL TEREX SP2010D ROLLER 14 $69,900.00 FLORIDA TRACTOR & EQUIPMENT COCOA, FL VIBROMAX 11 05D 30 $70,950.08 WALKER MILLER EQUIPMENT ORLANDO, FL AMMANN, MODEL - AC-11 0-2 30 $71,971.00 M.D. MOODY & SONS, INC. POMPANO BEACH, FL DYNAPAC MODEL CA250D 30-45 $72,166.00 M.D. MOODY & SONS, INC. POMPANO BEACH, FL DYNAPAC CA262D 30-45 $81,452.00 NATION'S RENT FT. PIERCE, FL DYNAPAC CA250D 4--7 $76,389.00 KELLY TRACTOR, CO. WPB, FL CA TERPILLER CS-533E 90 OR LESS $78,490.00 NUMBER OF COMPANIES NOTIFIED: 196 NUMBER OF BID DOCUMENTS DISTRIBUTED: 22 NUMBER OF BIDS RECEIVED: 10 * PER DEMANDSTAR.COM '-' ....., AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. -3-.ð. DATE: January 6, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 04-31 - Authorizing and empowering St. Lucie County to establish an account with Morgan Stanley as described in the Morgan Stanley corporate Account Agreement; in order to construct an Equestrian Center to be located at the St. Lucie County Fairgrounds; and that Adams Ranch, Ltd. Will donate to the County $350,000.00 payable over 15 years in lawful money of the United States. BACKGROUND: St. Lucie County is proposing to construct an Equestrian Center to be located at the St. Lucie County Fairgrounds and has solicited donations from private parties to help fund construction of the Center. The construction of the Equestrian Center will serve a public purpose and will benefit the citizens of St. Lucie County. Adams Ranch, Ltd. Has agreed to donate $350,000.00 payable over 15 years in the form oflawful money ofthe United States of America. This Board desires to accept the pledge by Adams Ranch, Ltd. The attached Resolution No. 04-31 has been drafted for that purpose. FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 04-31 as drafted. ""'" COMMISSION ACTION: [ X APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 County Attorney: .~- /-, Originating Dept. Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ Other: Other: ...., E: Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing Eft. 5/96 '-' ....,¡ RESOLUTION NO. 04-29 A RESOLUTION URGING GOVERNOR JEB BUSH AND THE FLORIDA LEGISLATURE TO PASS HB 1117 AND SB 2062, KNOWN AS THE INFANT EYE CARE BILL AND NICKNAMED "JOEY'S BILL", IN ORDER TO DETECT AND TREAT RETINOBLASTOMA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: l. Retinoblastoma is a very rare disease that affects children, causing the growth of malignant tumors in the retinal cell layer of the eye. Ninety percent of the cases occur in the first five years of life. 2. Retinoblastoma is the most common eye tumor in children, the third most common cancer that affects children overall and, if left untreated, Retinoblastoma is almost always fatal. 3. The key to saving lives and preserving visual function, is the early diagnosis and treatment of this disease. 4. One in every 677 live births in the United States has a treatable eye disease that will blind if not detected and treated. Cataracts are ten times more prevalent in infants than Retinoblastoma and can blind as early as two months of age if not treated. 5. Premature babies are the only infants in the United States that have an automatic eye dilation exam. 6. Early detection and referral is the key to saving our children's vision and, in the case of Retinoblastoma, lives. ~ ....I NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board urges Governor Jeb Bush and the Florida Legislature to pass HB 1117 and SB 2062, known as the Infant Eye Care Bill and nicknamed "Joey's Bill", in order to detect and treat Retinoblastoma. 2. The County Administrator is hereby directed to forward a copy of this resolution to Governor Jeb Bush and the Florida Legislature. After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Paula A. Lewis XX Vice Chairman John D. Bruhn XX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XX Commissioner Doug Coward xx Commissioner Cliff Barnes XX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 6 th day of January, 2004. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY '-' ...,; AGENDA REOUEST qð ITEM NO. If' ~~ DATE: January 6, 2004 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT:' Resolution No. 04-29 - Urging Governor Jeb Bush and the Florida Legislature to Pass HB 1117 and SB 2062, known as the Infant Eye Care Bill and nicknamed "Joey's Bill", in order to detect and treat Retinoblastoma. BACKGROUND: Retinoblastoma is a very rare disease that affects children, causing the growth of malignant tumors in the retinal cell layer of the eye. Ninety percent of the cases occur in the first five years of life. This Board supports eye pathology screening at birth and all well-baby exams to ensure that everything is being done to detect ocular diseases in newborns, infants and toddlers. FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 04-29 as drafted, and have the County Administrator forward a copy of this Resolution to Governor Bush and the Florida Legislature. [ X APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 CE: COMMISSION ACTION: Do sAnderson County Administrator --. Çfr/ Review and Approvals County Attorney: Management & Budget Originating Dept. Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)___ ...",¡ Purchasing Other: Eff. 5/96 "'" , AGENDA REQUEST ...; \.- ITEM NO. 10 DATE: Jan. 6, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT[x] INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: DON MCLAM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CENTRAL SERVICES SUBJECT: CONTRACT CHANGE ORDER #1 TO CONTRACT #C03-06-452 ADMINISTRATION BUILDING ADDITION I BARTH CONSTRUCTION, INC. BACKGROUND: On June 11th, 2003 bids were opened for the construction of the Administration Building Addition. The Board of County Commissioners approved award of Bid #03-058 to the lowest bidder, Barth Construction and St. Lucie County entered into contract with Barth Construction on June 24th, 2003 and sent out a Notice to Proceed dated November 10th, 2003. However, because of major permitting delays, due to circumstances beyond the control of the contractor, project commencement has been postponed and the time of performance as outlined in the contract will need to be extended 39 days with a completion date of November 1ih, 2004, thereby providing ample time for the contractor to complete this project. FUNDS AVAIL: 316-1930-562000-16008 (Buildings) PREVIOUS ACTION: Board of County Commissioners approved award of bid to Barth Construction on June 24th, 2003, item no. c 6-b. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve Contract Change Order #1 to Contract #C03-06-452, Barth Construction, to extend contract time for a completion date of November 12th, 2004 for the Administration Building Addition, and authorize the chairman to sign the prepared Change Order. MISSION ACTION: )C) APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 CE: Æountv Attornev' ,%'- Origin~ting De;~~ Finance: (Check for Copy only, if Applicable) Do Anderson County Administrator Coordination/Signatures Mgt. & Budget: '4'urchaSing Mgr.: ¿I,/ Other: Other: Eft. 1/97 H:\AGENDA\AGENDA-BARTH EXTENSION.DOC ! .. í ... ~~.AL~~EO~g~~T~ PROJECT: (name, address) Administration Building Addition ...., CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: it 1 INITIATION DATE: 12-29-2003 TO (Contractor): Barth Construction, Inc. 1717 Indian River Blvd. Vero Beach, Fl. 32960 CONSULTANT'S PROJECT NO.: You are directed to make the following changes in this Contract: (Additional sheet attached as Exhibit A - Yes No) Extend contract t~e by 39 days, changing date of completion to November 12, 2004. This request is due to major permitting delays due to circumstances beyond the control of the contractor. ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONTRACT NO: C03-06-452 CONTRACT DATE: June 24, 2003 The original (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) was .......................... $ Net change by previous authorized Change orders ..................................... $ The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) prior to this Change Order was ....... $ The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) will be (increased) (decreased or changed) by this Change Order ....................................................... $ The new (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) including this Change Order will be $ The Contract Time will be (increased) (decreased) (unchanged) by ( 39 ) Days, The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is: November 12, 2004 Funds Available: Account Number The adjustment in Contract Price and/or Contract Time stated in this Change Order shall comprise the total price and/or time adjustment due or owed the Contractor for the work or changes defined in this Change Order. By executing this Change Order, the Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the stipulated price and/or time adjustments include the costs and delays for all work contained in the Change Order, including costs and delays associated with the interruption of schedules, extended overheads, delay, and cumulative impacts or ripple effect on all other non-affected work under this Contract. Signing of the Change Order constitutes full and mutual accord and satisfaction for the adjustment in contract price or time as a result of increases or decreases in costs and time of performance caused directly and indirectly from the Change Order, subject to the current scope of the entire work as set forth in the Contract Documents. Acceptance of this waiver constitutes an agreement between the County and Contractor that the Change Order represents an equitable adjustment to the Contract, and that Contractor will waive all rights to file a claim on this Change Order after it is properly executed. All work performed under this Change Order shall be performed in accordance with the contract specifications. Recommended: Approved: By Agreed To: Barth Construction, Inc. Contractor l~ian River :cr1i- WHITE - VENDOR Cp.n~Tñl ~p.rv;~p.~ St. Lucie County Department 2300 Virginia A~.'Ft. Pierce,Fl.34982 Address \ 1\ k~ .. \ ~ ,-z):;y". 03 Date By D~ Authorized: St. Lucie County: 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Architect/Engineer Address Date Blvd.,Vero Beech,Fl.By Approved as to Form and Correctness , ~..J.~o J 0 '3» I Date County Attorney GREEN - PURCHASING PINK - DEPARTMENT GOLDENROD - FINANCE --~~ .... ,.,... ..., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. c-10b DATE: Jan. 6, 2004 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: DON MCLAM ASSISTANT DIRECTOR SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): CENTRAL SERVICES SUBJECT: CHANGE ORDER NO.1 TO CONTRACT NO. C03-05-492 PAUL JACQUIN & SONS, INC. FOR THE WALTON ROAD ANNEX BACKGROUND: Staff and REG Architects, Inc. have been meeting and working with Paul Jacquin & Sons on changes/modifications to the plans and design for the Walton Road Annex project. The staff's acceptable changes can be seen in Exhibit "A" of Change Order No.1. Some of the larger items are: 1) Permitting-County agreed to reimburse actual cost 2) Outlookers-change from cypress to foam 3) Sidewalk-replacing damaged north sidewalk 4) Dwarf Holly-miscount 5) Time Change-a notice to proceed was issued, permit was not received in a reasonable amount of time warranting a 78-day change in the contract FUNDS AVAIL: 316-1930-562000-1605 (buildings) PREVIOUS ACTION Board of County Commissioners approved award of contract on May 6,2003 to Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve Change Order No.1 to Contract No. C03-05-492 with Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. to increase the contract sum by $80,841.54 and extend the completion date to December 2, 2004 authorizing the chairman to sign the prepared Change Order. MISSION ACTION: DQ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved 5-0 CE: Dou derson Co nty Administrator Coordination/Signatures County Attorney: Originating ¿~~U \U-9 Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing Mgr.: Other: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only. if Applicable) Eft. 1/97 H:\AGENDA\AGENDA REQUEST FORM.WPD ~ "... , ,",HANGE ORDER ST. LUCIE COUN~ PROJECT: (name, address) Walton Road Annex 1664 SE Walton Road Port St. Lucie, Fl. TO (Contractor): Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. P.O. Box 4343 Ft. Pierce, Fl. 34948 ....J CHANGE ORDER NUMBER: 1 INITIATION DATE: December 30, 2003 CONSUL TANrS PROJECT NO.: ST. LUCIE COUNTY CONTRACT NO: C03-05-492 CONTRACT DATE: P02-158 You are directed to make the following ch~s in this Contract: (Additional sheet attached as Exhibit A ~ No) May 6, 2003 SEE EXHIBIT "A" The original (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) was .......................... Net change by previous authorized Change orders ..................................... The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) prior to this Change Order was ....... The (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) will be (increased) ~Xti~ ciI~) by this Change Order ....................................................... $ The new (Contract Sum) (Guaranteed Maximum Cost) including this Change Order will be $ The Contract Time will be (increased) (~~ (unchanged) by The Date of Substantial Completion as of the date of this Change Order therefore is: $ 3,013,000.00 $ -0- $ 3,013,000.00 80,841.54 3,093,841.54 ( 78) Days 12-02-2004 Funds Available: Account Number 316-1930-562000-1605 The adjustment in Contract Price and/or Contract Time stated in this Change Order shall comprise the total price and/or time adjustment due or owed the Contractor for the work or changes defined in this Change Order. By executing this Change Order, the Contractor acknowledges and agrees that the stipulated price and/or time adjustments include the costs and delays for all work contained in the Change Order, including costs and delays associated with the interruption of schedules, extended overheads, delay, and cum ulative impacts or ripple effect on all other non-affected work under this Contract. Signing of the Change Order constitutes full and mutual accord and satisfaction for the adjustment in contract price or time as a result of increases or decreases in costs and time of performance caused directly and indirectly from the Change Order, subject to the current scope of theentire work as set forth in the Contract Documents. Acceptance of this waiver constitutes an agreement between the County and Contractor that the Change Order represents an equitable adjustment to the Contract, and that Contractor will waive all rights to file a claim on this Change Order after it is properly executed. All work performéd under this Change Order shall be performed in accordance with the contract specifications. Recommended: Approved: Central Services St. Lucie County Department 2300 Virqinia Ave.,Ft. Pierce, Fl > /2-3p-t?3 .Ad~c.,^- ~k-~ Date By Authorized: St. Lucie County: 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 Architect/Engineer Address ~ ~ . Agreed To: 12-30-03 Date Contractor By Approved as to Form and Correctness Date Address WHITE - VENDOR Date CANARY-DEPARTMENT By County Attorney PINK - PURCHASING GOLDENROD - FINANCE .... " , '-' ...., ST. LUCIE COUNTY WALTON ROAD ANNEX Contract No. C03-05-492 Purchase Order No. P2313696 CHANGE ORDER # 1 EXHIBIT "A" ITEM ADD/DEDUCT APPROVED PROFIT % SUB-TOTAL TOTAL AMOUNT Permitting Add 35,781.13 $35,781.13 Permit Time Add 637.50 637.50 Foam Cypress Add 18,923.00 +15% 2,838.45 21,761.45 5 Hose Bibs Add 2,800.00 +15% 420.00 3,220.00 Water Fountain Add 1,503.00 +15% 225.45 1,728.45 Hand Sink Add ··1,139.00 +15% 170.85 1,309.85 Damaged Add Sidewalk 7,184.00 +15% 1,077.60 8,261.60 Dwarf Hollv Add 11,944.00 +15% 1,791.16 13,735.16 Plans Add 3,194.00 +15% 479.10 3,673.10 Clock Add 6,132.00 +15% 919.,80 7,051.80 Interior Walls Deduct (12,840.00) (+15%) (1,926.00) (14,766.00) Deluge System Deduct (1,350.00) (+15%) (202.50) (1,552.50) $75,047.63 5,793.91 $80,841.54 Contract Time Add 78 Days , '-' ....., THE CI119F pó.r.Sr..LUCIE"l'ð.k ~ .lSE- '. c· .ENGINEERING DEPÁRTMENT........, , ....."'........... 121 SW PORT ST. LUCIE BLVD.' PORT ST. LUCIE, FL349S4 (772)B71·'p.!77· " ....... ,........ .....>';.;..... '274494 .... I . ;:;~~), .1 tB I.~' ~-~~" ., - L.\.,J .1 DATE < u · ';';;';;';",1 ! " AMOUNT OF ACCOU~. .. . '.,' ,""..;- , : '.. .'; . . . . . , ' -' .. . . . . . " . " . q CA~H :~~ECK O'M..(). (~,tJ. i/.t6olt1 . ",. BY .. ,>/J1!l4.. . ".. .:'.'. - ~. ~ , .... .' . ' . . .~. . . .:;,L~.;;: . ;.t; .. '. . '. '. .. f . ,j ~1_.-J___-:-__~._~~____.~_.___.____~__ _""" -~;----~.'..~p-_ . - . ','~ '. . - -- '. , -:~ :., - " - . ,- '- . . ~;. :.' - -. JOANNE- HOLMA!'-l, . CLERI:<·· 'OF)THE C I RCU :r TCOµ~T .......::. SA r NT LtJc I E COUNTY. P. a.DRAwER 700~ FORT:e'IE~qE, . FLORIDA 3;954 RECORþ~NG DEP~RTMENT -"' .... " . ."~ , ,"-,. '. "".. . !~\,",;:..-.,; ':~~_:,: ~cÊlþ:t~:"NHf'-'<>'- 3¿~~'f5 \;;~i> t':, ,~,,·;-_-.":,:i.:¡_ ' ,-".'. . .>.~.:'\~ ',' :,~ ._. . ..'~:..i_";:: "~~~'" , . :L,E#:225,~~J?,< BOOK# ~,1?-~ pAGEtt fa§~ ,TYPE: NC.,. FOR~ST. Ll.!CIÇ;',COUNTY CENTRAL SERVICES/PAUL JAcciUI N . ~..~ ·,o.e.,,'.. ·,c..p·.'.',.,.::.·....:,~:__·,.~...~::.,..:,-.....~:~_:.:...,~. ,". g.~:.:.t._.;·...,~7'E'..::i ,.\ ·..';it-i..;.I,:.:;:,~:..',0.,'.:ø,:.é. 0 0:':'; ~.'~ t i f ¡'''t. . . :- '-'- "', .: ··,·,.....·.id:r.·.:,k.~,.:.F,·:. :~.'..~.::,,:,~~.:~ .'-: .:-: .i~.· ''. ,',., . ":-0, " '.-' " " . ,,' . . TI.Ý~: 15 .= 27 ";"'" . '. :" ';. ."'.~::_':; . . '; " . . ,","" . ..-....: '-;.. """'. ..... .~::. '- '-: ,',':.~:';;'-;":~'.::":\' ,"..; ',-',', ,..,.. '.; ....~..~.. - "';'; z··:·.,. {~'_'',;_:~:..; ~'..;.";;~~~<'.:" ~:.': ", ..r... .' ,'_,' ',' '_..,. ," . ¡, :.~':.'.__".;..-'.';,'.. .. ;, .,.·.'y'r;',,--;/>' . -!..,','~,·"n'~E::;';t"!,,,:;·, :êc e~v ~cf~:~r 0 m':Þt:\ÌJL.~A~Qµ~ '" '&$dNS'/ . ':.-..:, ....-.-..- . '...... '>.:'.....,'. '.' ........ - '. ..-' ,< . .'...... ·:._:~:;:~d;:~¿:·~~;~·. GHËCK'·~E;C~:D~. ;'; \_~.~. ~""<: :.:J-: _, ;:~ - '\':~~ ·'·~i '.' :.. ;.~~ 1H .';~ TOTAL ,PAlo; .. .. "':',':-;. \,.~ .. J NL i:~~, '6'1=', '~::F~~~~/:'~::;~ :'.', ',';' '. ~-" 10.40 ,',' ~". - '1 .- B y :EcÙ{ª>,Då"d~1d gft :DEPºt¥<'Çµ.:E",.-"RK~\>\;"·· . .,-~.'- ", ".' . . - .' ~ .;: ~.," '.:~ --;.: ': '; ·t~ , ::~~~1 :....,.. - '.:....;.. -;~~: , "'~ . .. ", .:-1 .~: '.'"..; , ',;,.,,;;;:.,- ;'c- ':i-'~':' :It ..:·'i·~!i :::-. --·-----·_··_a___~________ ...... a __'_""'. . .,', -.' -'-- _--....:..._--------~:_------~-~-------:... ;t- ~ / ¡ i:. '-' Work Request Charges Quotation FPL-Power Systems To: PAUL JACQUIN 5999..()41-0419 1664 SEWALTON RD CNST PORT SAINT LUCIE, 34952 NEW COUNTY BLD Quote Number: TC8064431 Description: Quote Date: Preferred Option: No. Payments: Project: 11/12/2003 Yes Quotation Details Description Install & Remove OH Svc Drop & Meter Unit Refundable? Cost No 145.00 Quantity 1 ...I Total 145.00 Due Before Work Y Paid Y Charges Due Before Work Starts: Tax: 145.00 0.00 Subtotal: 145.00 Charges Due On Completion: Tax: 0.00 0.00 Subtotal: 0.00 Total Charges: Total Tax: Total Including Tax: Total Refundable: Total Non-Refundable: ***** PAY ONLY CHARGES DUE ON COMPLETION (PLUS TAX) ***** Ifø~v ¡<¡¡/tJ3 -~ 145.00 0.00 145.00 0.00 145.00 6 (J'7J flIt. P. . . /70. 1ft) 1 '-' -....I c 3&79 I,.--- Building Department of Port St. Lucie, FL Period Batch Item Print Date/Time 10/31/03 774 048 10/02/03 14:49:00 Customer: PAUL JACQUIN Qty 1 Description PLNREV 0329003 Payments Check Fee 5625.00 Total Due Total 5625.00 --------- 5625.00 Amount 5625.00 Perm it No. Check Date 10/02/03 814 Bldg. Fee Schools Roads Radon Tax BIC Publ ic Bldg. Library Parks N of C Police Fire EMS Total .00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --------- 0.00 Cb+ L ttlcj e (() .) ~ 4-'1 7\ ~V} í1>e.)J Ie LÒ' ; Building Period 10/31/03 '-' Department of Port St. Lucie, FL Batch Item 774 054 PAUL JACQUIN Customer: Qty 1 1 Description PERM 0329012 PLNREV 0329012 Payments Check Pel'''m it No. Bldg. Fee Schools Roads Radon Tax BIC Publ ic Bldg. Library Parks N of C Police Fire EMS Total Perm i t No. Bldg. Fee Schools Roads Radon Tax DIC Publ i c Bldg. Library Pal'''ks N of C Police Fire EMS Total Check # 18078 0329012 Confirm 107.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 --------- 107.00 0329012 Confirm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 ---------- 0.00 Check Date 10/02/03 816 816 -...I Print Date/Time 10/02/03 15:06:56 Fee 107.00 54.00 Total Due '5.\- Total 107.00 54.00 --------- 161.00 Amount 161.00 . . L 0 C_ \ e.... Lo v V'\ +r f\ V) nf.-'f 1 Building Period 12/31/03 '- Department of Port St. Lucie, FL Batch Item 816 005 PAUL JACQUIN Customer: Qty Description 1 PERM 0329003 1 ELEC/AC/PLUMB/INSUL PaYllents Check Pet"m i t No. Bldg. Fee Schools Roads Radon Tax BIC Publ icBldg. Library Parks N of C Po lice Fire EMS Total Check # 18107 0329003 Confirm 13744.87 0.00 0.00 244.00 0.00 0..00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 0.00 --------- 13993.87 Check Date 12/01/03 814 ...." Print Date/Time 12/01/03 13:40:17 Fee 13993.87 6418.29 Total Due Total 13993.87 6418.29 --------- 20412.16 Amount 20412.16 · '-' ..." -.. - .... .-- ....... - "... ......."..,.".,",:: "".:'''.' '. ,....'.'. 8m LTTQ'T77I OOu....7\.TjTY "::'::~:~~,:,/:--::.: "-L " U I ~.LJI .J.. ,,: .J~_'·""!o~Ú':U: FIRE DISTRIOT ;~ :'~..," \'~}', . . "y,/::::: 2400 RHODE ISLAND A VENUE , ·:~Q.ì~~f0<": FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 84950 Invoice No. 8-03-384 INVOICE !!!!!! Customer Name Paul Jacquin & Sons Address P. O. Box 4343 City Ft Pierce State FL ZIP 34948 Phone Date 11/2112003 # Plans Building Name/Address Unit Price TOTAL PLAN REVIEW 1 St Lucie County Administration Annex $7,532.50 $7,532.50 1668 SE Walton Rd Port St Lucie, FL 34952 City of Port St Lucie ALL FEES ARE DUE UPON RECEIPT. FIRE MARSHAL INSPECTIONS SHALL NOT BE SCHEDULED UNTIL FEES ARE PAID. I FIRE DISTRICT FEES ARE SEPARATE FROM BUILDING DEPARTMENT FEES. SLC FIRE DISTRICT RESOLUTION #416-03 If you have already mailed payment, please disregard this notice. If you believe you have been billed incorrectly, please contact our office immediately at (772) 462-8306. Payment Details o Cash $7,532.50 [~ Check ] ~~~~g MAKE CHECK PAYABLE TO: ST. LUCIE COUNTY FIRE DISTRICT ATTN: FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU' . 2400 RHODE ISLAND AVENUE, FORT PIERCE, FL 34950 INVOICE NUMBER: B-03-384 PROJECT NAME: AMOUNT ENCLO$ED: St Lucie County Administration Annex Paul Jacquin & Sons [ ) COMPANY NAME: , 1 Building Period 11/30/03 '-' Department of Port St. Lucie, FL Batch Item 803 099 PAUL JACQUIN Print Date/Time 11/12/03 14:51:57 Customer: Qty 1 Descriction REV 0329003 C3679 Payments Check ~ Lv¿,~ Fee 100.00 Total Due Check Date 11/12/03 c.e.v,^~ 'A-V\ t'\ ~ 'e '71\ "':),'". ~~J\'2;O-.) '\ CÄ""- ~ ,e..~ """"" Total 100.00 --------- 100.00 Amount 100.00 t If" '-' T.S. Project No.: Project Name: ' .~ Service Address:' J 6{, l\ S.~(.)(\\\.{"X'"\ ~\:.J .ç>~~~Ü~\~ ~~~=~~·~~t~~~~~~~~~~L~~~l~ ~ -r<\ ~ O~\~'f'("~ . .... .. ....." ~eceipt NC? 38.67 \~6t.:\b~,,£>4 Î h WATER ERCs: SEWER ERCs: Plant Capacity: Inspection Fees: Review Fees: Plant Capacity: Inspection Fees: Review Fees: Meter Install Fee: Deposit: Domestic Meter Size: Irrigation Meter Install Fee: Irrigation'Deposit: Irrigation Meter Size: ~ \ DO-DO ,t:J <i \\ ' Meter Install Fee: Deposit: ' drinder: Telemetry: . Wastewater TreatInent Plant: NPO SpO wpO' RECEIVED BY: -D{1~ , \ {)-'1-D'3 ,,' . '.' ,'';.. ~ '. ; , .': '.. ~:. ,:. . . ' ~ .', u·._ __ _.__ ,..__.,._ '_". ----..-..--.....-..-.--.---...-.. .._- .,.. . - ----.-.----'- -. --- - '.t':' MISCÊLLANEOUS: SAD I USA Phase Nó: Recording Fees: . . . ._l Specification Books: , Applicåtion Pr<x:ess Fee: Blue Prints: Fire'Line: iO Yes 0 No o Yes ,0 No f' , . Gu~t~d'R~venue: , Other: AMOUNT: $.. .,. G~ l·W ~~~J~W .....- -....... .,---~_.___.,._,.. __.r. '___._~._..._ -.. " ..~- ..... - . ~ . ,.. JOANNE HOLI"IAI'i :;LEm\ OF THE CI RClII T COURT -. SAINT LUCl~OUNTY P.O. DRAWER ~ FORT. PIERCE, FLORIDA 34954 RECORDING DEPARTMENT TIME: lE.:03 RECEIPT NO: ·~;72Ø 11 DATE: 08/27/2003 FILE~ BOOK# 1785 PAGE# 2116 TYPE~ FOR: CUSHMAN FRUIT_._.. UL-JAe~ONŠ INC Recot~ding Fees: .- 10~50 :-----. ¡Copies: -_.- '::.00 Cet~tifIC"at-Í-a..t!.: Cl et"k Fee: ----. ~A L:~ FILE#: 226103'3 FOR: FIDELITY 8.· Recol'"ding Fees: Copies: BOOK# 1785 PAGE# 2118 TYPE: BOND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MD/ST LUCIE COUNTY 33.00 7.00 Certification: 1. 0Ø FILE#: 2261040 BOOK# 17D5 PAGE# 2125 TYPE: BOND FOR: FIDELITY & DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MD/ST LUCIE COUNTY Recording Fees: 33.0Ø Copies: 7.00 Certification: 1. Ø0 Rece i v ed ft'om: PAUL JACQUIN & SONS INC CHECI"- REC'D: 95.90 95.90 TOTAL PAID: -.----.-----.---.--..---- -.--"---::-.'---.----.._ __"_0- JOANNE HOLMAN, CLEm'~ OF THE CIRCUIT COURT -. SAINT LUCIE COUNTY P.O. DRAWER 700, FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34954 RECORDING DEPARTMENT T I ME : 1 b : 03 RECEIPT NO: ~~'7 L~Ø 11 DATE: 08/27/2003 ONLINE Official Validation . BY: Patrice Robinson 'DEPUTY CLERK '. /"' _ ~,.(/ ,'" ,9tr5~ ~-t~ ¡JOt:. ~.:»'-? __ B¡z;,'/ #cð ¡?ð &JÞ5 Cp U,ù'Ý ~iÙt1fJ · ,,~! .}/ .J!. I V /) I ':t JIp'I :ATLANTlC INTERJ...· SERVICES INC FAX I'D. :5615752770 '--' Atlantic Interior Services, Inc.· . 208 N. U.S. Hwy. 1 · Suite #2 · 1èquesta, FL 33469 Ph.: 561·575-4499 · Fax: 561-575-2770 Dec. 09 2' .10: 4ØAM P1 .."" Proposal . December 9. 2003 Submitted to: Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. Phone: 772-465-2475 Fax: 772-466·2806 Attention: Mike Job Name: WaltoD Road ADDex Plans Dated: Job Ùlcation: To install all AOS type walls to just above ceiling height in lieu of inståJ.lin¡ to deck 824 In ft ) II floor from 16' down to 10'6" - 4.530 sq ft. 540 In ft 2~ f100r from 14' down to 10'6" = 1,890 Sq ft. Total 6,420 sq ft. 6,420 sq 1\ x 52.00 = DEDUCT <512,840.00> ~ .. . Ac¿ustica1 Ceilings · Acoustical Wall Panels · Ceramic Tile · Drywall · Floor. CÒv~rlngs uec U::I Uë: U::I:1111 . ,. . . p. 1 '-' ..." ~,~~. I ."J. . t;t METRO FIRE SPRINKLER SERVICES, INC. 1501 Decker Avenue, Bay 522, Stuart Florida 34994 (561) 288-0615 Fax (561) 288-5122 December 9, 2003 Pul Jacquin & Sons P.O. Box 4343 Ft. Pierce, Florida 34948 Phone: 772-465-2475 Fax: 772-466-2806 Ann: Mike Jacquin Re: St. Lucie County Administration Annex South CHANGE ORDER REQUEST Delete 1 Y2 deluge valve assembly and electric release panel at multi-purpose Training Rc>om #207 - Total- Deduct $1,350.00. ~~ùç~ , .. I \.. ~ ~FOAII QUOT~TIOII 'tV t - Ò J "'FACTORY, Ine. ~~-Dono,.¡-; Dondoliwry"""cndit~ FORT tAUDERDALE COMMERCE CENTER f~Jht & Tax Not lnet ded In Quote unless oIherw;sed neIId. 3510 NW 53rd St., Fort Lauderdale,'Fl33309 Job SbtDale__ (954) 45~700 · Fax (954) A86-8222 Shi,Jping Time __ - 0 Weeks :1'. AL S.Nf~ www.foamfactory.com E-mail: salesOfoamractory_com.Prig. do not indud. i saallation. /,.. Ñt't.&eQ, "",,' . - 81LL TO:. ð SHIP TO: ,.... A- t.t '- ::¡ /tC ! I.,A' N /ìtr77'l." YII..2fPl FOAM FACTOR (954) 48S""'22 p. 1 Si - ~c.ir (,,"'.....,y A/"'t"~ ICtV\I\Y' "I' . '. . . (. ."_ '.... .:. :." JOJ/ i ¡'. .- PL C fL 1 (11¿(.'5j EPS Raw l' 1,51. ~{ 1'1 (Jl p tP l{ µ 11rr¿'-~ \.A-cJoO '-eX'!'- ~ 8M(fL(f-~ 'I II b /W X 3 ~ Lu'-1 Y ) 1'1 & L/J ¿g' "'- fJ..R f,7/r"'.(¡(~-~ o Vt f l 0 rJ 1<' ( fl. ~ k. otJ /) U tJ 1<' Itp 6 II~."- tl'-\ '2,0 If 3 y J/H X'3v '~. r ~ v.-Jf)~ A~..k1 e7;A'~~ W~ fleet) 1õ /fA ~~< /rrJ'¡,r 1~ de VoJrl) fittt. /16 L.f) f{)12 A-ft~·f),,¡'.... . Paimcf Not Pain'" iõi: øcWlionol paintiftg d-øe fW mini_ '50.00 Slandarcl Cut Coral 953/959 No Point Charg. foam fodoly is not ~ lor final lab off. & /MaW"""'. n.,,.,.,., be cf-s.d ønd cvatDmdr. , QUOTED BY: 'b::~ ki L..,'..sl- ~; "/s ¡ """$~C::/-S µø W4 IIr,-· ì 'TfJ - - . f'" -~. ~ ....", PR»pasaI TR,PlE f( PlUMB'NG. 'NC. 1862 ~R08d Ft. Pierce. FL 34946 (772)461-e662 (772)481-6004 F-. ~bers.2003 ProøasaI SUDmltted To: PaUl JacqUin & Sons 466-2806 (fa)c) Job Name: St Lucie Çouoty Administration Annex St. Lucie County. ~ w.. het1Iby 8Ubmit ~ IInd estimateo Ibr IJ/Umb/ng; AcId one ADA ~ rlnrtldng Ibuntain at entranœ 10 ~ '0', Material S 1123 laber _ 2tQ TOTALPRPOsAl $1~ - - __, -_, __...,.., ...,.", . ,I..l" vv....."'...lJyv.. . , ." ~ Propc.1 TRIPLE K PLUMBING, INC. 1862 Copenhaver Road Ft. Pierce, FL 34945 (772)461 ~662 (772}461-8004 Fax December 3, 2003 Proposal Submitted To: Paul Jaçquin & Sons, Inc. 466-2806 (faX) ~U.l ...." Job Name: St. Lucie County Annex Port St. Lucie, Florida We hereby submit specifications and estimates fer plumbing: Add 2- draIn pipe and hot and cold water for breakroom sink piping only. No fbdures. No permitting, demo or patching. Material $ 200 Labor 600 TOTAL PROPOSAL $ 800 Note: This Proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within 30 days. ,. ...... '- "-"" Proposal TRIPLE K PLUMBING. INC. 1862 Copenhaver Road Ft. Pierce, FL 34945 (772)461-6662 (772)461-8004 Fax Deœmber 3, 2003 Proposal Submitted To: Paul Jacquin & Sons, lno. 466-2806 (fax) Job Name: st. Lucie County Annex Port Sl Lucie, Flofida We hereby submit specifications and estimates for plumbing: Add fiYe wall hydrants With lockable boxes. No permitting, demo or patching. Material labor TOTAL PROPOSAL S 1800 1000 $2800 Note: This Proposal may be withdrawn by us if not accepted within 30 days. ~~/~~/L~U~ LU.J~ f'~~COLU'J ............."1'wu ..1.1'11.-0 r"'1o\I:It. t:)J. .-..... .., '-' ..""" - COHCO INC. M11 MTØPN8E ROAD FOIn ~E, FL MIa UC....... CG ~a Phone: m _lID Fa: ~ .......: ~_._----,.... ....: ~~A""".___ PROPOSAl: DATE: TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 25,2003 TO: PAUL JACQUIN & SONS, INC. ATTN: DAVID RE: ST. LUCIE COUNTY WAlTON ROAD ANNEX SIDEWALKS FROM: NORMAN FORTIER FAX: 772.488.2806 lABOR AND MATERIAl TO FORM, PLACE AND FINISH SIDEWALKS AS FOLLOWS: 1. APPROXIMATELY 1,880 SF OF CONCRETE SIDEWALK AT S3.201SF 2. 3,OOO-PSI WITH FIBER MESH PRICE: $ 6,016.00 ACCEPTED: Signature Date Print Name J. ~I U¿,f ~tJtJ..J 1...... tJ..~ , , ¿"'OJ. :..1"'0' I..of-W":L. I WI'! r-~V J.1'It.::I ,.''''' ~ ~ CHANGE ORDER #1 To CONTRACT dated DA TE of this Change Order DEC. 2. 2003 TO: PAUL JACQUIN & SONS PRE~OUSCONTRACTAMOUNT ADD IArtbis C.O. s JOB: S.l.C. ANNEX DEDUCTforthil C.O. AT: NEW CONTRACT AMOUNT It..... Mtn.... In""" die -...._..., OW...vt c...... III _co~. ....Iut..~.... _'0It s~~...... Mlow. It .. ~ ... .. tile .....11IIIfte!b .rille hrtIm ...... .....c........ c......- .. ......~ .... COIIIInd .. dftaIII........n.. roI-= REMOVE AND HAUL-OFF SIDEWALK ON WALTON RD. S NET ADD THIS CHANGE ORDER $ Please Sip and Return One CODY II L. ftntIter~,... ... aP'ft'll... .,I:111III.. ~.-.Iiti._ nf'" C...... . it ..., llefttoCòN '"" ...,... ... m-Ift h_. ACCEPTE.D: ACCEPTED: BV: BY: CARLTON PAVING P.O. Box 12549 Fort Pie~e, FL. 34979-2549 ~J~ DUa: fREEMAN - SUPERVISOR (TItII) (TN" ) Date: Date: DEC. %. 2003 r-~I:It:. t:J.<: "'"00 868.00 868.00 1r .~. .... ..."." Coast1'ine LANDSCAPE & MAINT., INC. 6680 S. W. Gator Trail' Palm City, FL 34990 . (772) 223-7318 . Fax: (772) 223-73 19 I DATE i ESTIMATE NO. I I I 1031 12/3/2003 Estimate NAME/ADDRESS PROJECT Paul Jacquin & Sons, Inc. PO Box 4343 Ft. Pierce, FL 34948 St. Lucie Co. Administrative Annex I TERMS I Due on receipt QTY DESCRIPTION SIZE UNIT COST TOTAL CHANGE ORDER # I The total of Dwarf Yaup on Holly increase to match what shows on the plan. 1,493 IIex vomitoria 'Nana' #3, 24"X24" 8.00 11,944.00 DwarfYaupon Holly I I After approval please sign and return. Thank you! TOTAL SIGNATURE $11,944.00 ... Coastline Landscape & Maintenance, Inc. guarantees all material to be as specified, and the above work to be perfonned in accordance with the drawings. All accounts become past due and delinquent after 30 days from dated invoice. Past due accounts are subject to a minimum late chg of 1.5% of the account balance per month. Any cost incurred as a result of non-payment of this bill, including interest and late charges of 1.5% per month, costs of collection, attorney's fees and court costs, will be substained by customer. ..... . .. -_. --. ---- . . __ -,0- ,,___ ~ Reprographic Solutio/Is I;rc. ï18 sw P('Tl St. l~..e BI't'rl.Suile!~ Port S t I."de, FL.H~'.53 pÍt(ìì2}34G-J430 {u.~t( 11~)340-3034 £-",40- (:hrl~@"pr(J'?18.r.om ...." Dale 1~1.2003 '""""~ u. 1 n'l-'c)ice ¡nvvi.a: 1# 2:t2/9 Bill '1'0 ShiJ1 T() .PIlTI.l facqnin 6' ~¡:"s 734~ Commercia' Circie n. Piuc~, fT. 34951. Pu.14.l jrU:I/ui.rr (-I ~(J~ . ~B COmJ"f.rcial Cirodl'. IF J. P~'r.P., Fl. 34951 I . I , ntJl rf.t.!11' LJi!~(.:rlrfi.MI R!f~ A.m()1/.11r ·w .I I ·1,166 ,8(: 24.«'=~6 .DC 2'lX36 COPIES ".,., 2,c.199.5~T I .", I... , I J i I I I I , I I i I i I I ! I i i I I I I I I I I . I I I , I ¡.P.O.NO. . ST.LU'CI€ ANNEX I T...... I I Ship W. Dlœ Jaml,l1'Y 4-1 I I I Jrlfi.mK yvu I(}J' ytJUT bwrines!;. ~ I I I I I I Su'7tQtal 5ale$ Tel.'; (6.5%) TO'lïli .Bala1'ICC Due , $2,999.52 I i i I I , i SlY4.Yï $3,194.4.9 $3,19~A9 · -...:\. '-' ...., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO: c- If DATE: January 6, 2004 Regular[ ] Public Hearing [ ] Consent [X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: John Franklin, Housing Manager Via Beth Ryder, Director SUBMITTED BY: Community Services Division SUBJECT: Permission to advertise four separate RFP's for the FFY 2004 Community Development Block Grant Application. BACKGROUND: In order to submit a grant application under the Florida Department of Community AtTairs (DCA) for a SmaU Cities Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) program which includes funding under three different categories; Neighborhood Revitalization, Housing Rehabilitation, and Commercial Revitalization it is necessary to advertise for requests for proposal for Grant WritingIPlanning and Grant Administration for each of the categories as listed. See attached Memo # 04-34. FUNDS AVAIL: From grant funds when and if the grant is awarded to St. Lucie County PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board approved Craig A Smith and Associates for the Planning and Writing of the FFY 1998 CDBG application. RECOMMENDATION: StatT recommends the Board grant permission to advertise 4 (four)RFP's for FFY 2004 Neighborhood Revitalization, Housing Rehabilitation and Economic Development Community Development Block Grant applications. [¥ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER Approved 5-0 COMMISSION ACTION: M:ounty Attorney: x IJt.¡.I Management & Budget x Purchasing: x &i~ Originating Department: x Other: Other: Finance: x Check for copy only, if applicable ~ s - , f' \ø;.. ..., COMMUNITY SERVICES MEMORANDUM #04-34 TO: Ed Parker, Purchasing Manager FROM: John Franklin, Housing Manag r Via Beth Ryder, Director SUBJECT: Request for Proposals for Professional Consulting Services to prepare and administer FFY 2004 Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) DATE: January 2, 2004 Confirming our telephone conversation of today, St. Lucie County will be eligible to apply for another project during the State fIScal year 2004. The grant application to the state will (begin) open February 16,2004 and end (close) at 5:00 P.M. on April 1, 2004 ("the deadline date"). When awarded, the Florida Small Cities Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) covers all costs for the project up to the maximum allocation ofS750,000. The consultant to plan and administer the grant and engineering firm for engineering services are eligible for reimbursement under the grant. Attached is the Scope of Services for the consultant and for an engineering firm. Two separate RFP's must be advertised, one firm can answer both RFP's, but under the federal guidelines we must advertise them separately. Should one firm be awarded both contracts, a neutral third party, probably this office will need to monitor to insure that there is no conflict of interest. The consultant and the engineer will be hired with the understanding that should the grant application be denied, no compensation will be paid to them for any oftheir services and they will receive compensation only for services eligible for reimbursement under the approved grant. cc: Doug Anderson, County Administrator Beth Ryder, Director of Community Services Division