HomeMy WebLinkAboutMinutes 03-08-2007
..
FORT PIERCE HARBOR ADVISORY COMMITTEE
Minutes of Meeting
March 8, 2007
Convened at 3:05 p.m.
Adjourned at 3:53 p.m.
This meeting of the Fort Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee (FPHAC) was held Thursday,
March 8, 2007 at 3:00 p.m. in Conference Room 3 on the 3rd floor of the Administration
Building, 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce, Florida.
1. ROLL CALL
Roll call was taken.
Members Present: Mary Chapman, Chairperson
Howard Conklin, Vice Chairman
Jeanne Hearn
Gerald Kuklinski
Pieter Stryker (Arrived at 3: 1 0 pm)
Members Absent: Councilman Christopher S. Cooper
Commissioner Eddie Becht
David Souza
Bill Thiess
Also Present: Heather Young, SLC Assistant County Attorney
Michael Brillhart, SLC Economic & Strategic Development
Charles Grande, SLC Commissioner
Ken Roberts, Indian River Terminal
Bob Bangert
Larry Storms
2. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES:
After a motion and a second, the minutes from the February 8th meeting were unanimously
approved with two changes. The minutes show Mr. Robella's name spelled incorrectly. It
should be spelled "Mr. Ravelo". Ms. Hearn requested that "fly zone" be changed to "fly over
zone" because it is an overpass.
3. OLD BUSINESS:
Ms. Hearn asked if anything had been done regarding Commissioner Becht's suggestion of
placing an R.F.P. (Request for Proposal) on the Harbor Pointe property. Mary Chapman said
that the letter went to the County Commissioners on February 19th but had not heard any
feedback. Ms. Hearn suggested having the Chairman of the Board, Commissioner Chris
Craft, attend the next Fort Pierce Harbor Advisory meeting to speak with the committee.
Howard Conklin asked if the minutes could be approved without a quorum. Mary Chapman
said no.
Fort Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee
March 8, 2007
Page 2
""",~~-~==-"~,,
Mary Chapman asked Mr. Hearn if she had been to Tallahassee or if she spoke with Mr. Sole.
Ms. Hearn said no. Ms. Hearn said she placed a call to an Aide, but spoke with a secretary.
Ms. Hearn explained the situation to the secretary and was told that an Aide would call her. In
the meantime, Ms. Hearn received a call from Mr. Vielhauer. He explained that he shouldn't
be speaking with her because the Waterfront Council has an attorney. Ms. Hearn told Mr.
Vielhauer that she did not call to speak with him. Ms. Hearn introduced herself and told Mr.
Vielhauer that she was a citizen and an independent as well as a member of the Waterfront
Council.
Jerry Kuklinski said at Monday's City Commission meeting, Mayor Benton stated that
Commissioner Becht mentioned sending a letter to the County. Ms. Hearn said that she
thought the letter would be to the Governor. Ms. Hearn said that she would like the Fort
Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee to make a recommendation to the County that they send a
letter to the Governor, as well as the City of Fort Pierce, letting them know that D.E.P. should
not accept information that is not correct. Mary Chapman asked if there was a motion. Ms.
Hearn moved that the Fort Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee ask the County to send a letter
in reference to items five and six on the request for extension of time to file petition for
administrative hearing. Howard Conklin asked Heather Young if it should be a formal filing in
the proceeding. Heather Young said that actually Terry Lewis, the County's outside council, is
working on a formal filing, as well as Doug Anderson, the County Administrator. Heather
stated that the committee's motion was certainly welcome. Howard Conklin asked if Terry
Lewis and Doug Anderson were aware of the factual misrepresentation on the extension
request. Heather Young said yes. Heather said her understanding of what happened was,
Destin Beach filed their petition for extension on the 20th. The petition was not copied to the
County or to Terry Lewis. On the 22nd D.E.P. granted the extension. Heather said that
D.E.P.'s basis of granting the extension was saying that Destin Beach demonstrated good
cause in their petition. Howard Conklin made a motion to "support the current activity of the
council, to challenge the motion for extension, and also challenge the factual ground for the
request on part of the applicant." Ms. Hearn seconded Howard Conklin's motion and withdrew
her previous motion. Howard Conklin's motion was unanimously decided upon.
Mary Chapman asked if any of the other committee members had anything to say regarding
the letter requesting an RF.P. Howard Conklin said that when he suggested the RF.P.
"many moons ago" Mr. Wazny, Assistant County Administrator, said they would not consider
developing that area until the infrastructure was completed, Le. additional roadways, water,
electric, etc. They would not develop it until that plan had been effectuated. Ms. Hearn asked
if they were currently running water and sewer to the Harbor Pointe area. Michael Brillhart,
S.L.C. Economic & Strategic Development Director, said that there is City water and sewer
lines along 2nd Street and that the design of 2nd Street is currently being redone. Michael also
said that there are bits and pieces of infrastructure that are available although there would
have to be some updating. Ms. Hearn said that the Ritz Carlton people were willing to do their
own infrastructure.
Howard Conklin said that his original idea for bringing it up was, if the County was to place
facilities on the Pointe that were totally inconsistent with cargo operations, it would be much
harder for Mr. Bell's enterprise to get approved for anything that would deviate from the
master plan. Ms. Hearn stated that the only opposite side she could see would be, if she was
a "big time investor" would she take the risk to put a Ritz Carlton or something high class there
and then have the County or the City fail and allow cargo operations next door by being lax.
...
!
,
Fort Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee
March 8, 2007
Page 3
Ms. Hearn also said that if positive things were going to happen north of the creek she would
think that that's going to be a good indicator to people in the Harbor Pointe area that would be
of interest.
4. NEW BUSINESS:
Mary Chapman said that the Fort Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee had never addressed the
"Sunshine Law". Heather Young said the committee is subject to the "Sunshine Law", which
means that all of the meetings need to be noticed. The definition of a meeting consists of
when two or more members of the committee communicate. Communication includes
meeting outside or email communication on matters that are likely to come before the
committee in the future. All records of the committee are open to the public. Also County
Staff is not supposed to act as an intermediary between members of the sunshine group.
Staff cannot go back and forth to try to come to a consensus outside of the public meeting.
Heather said that sharing information is fine but that it needs to be sent through Stephanie
Bush. She will make sure everyone receives the information. Howard Conklin stated that
Heather Young mentioned future meetings and asked if it would be proper to talk about events
and actions of prior meetings. Heather said that it could be done, but that this particular
committee has long standing discussions over issues that are spanning a number of years. It
would be hard to say unless it's something that is "dead and decided and will never come
back."
Heather Young introduced Michael Brillhart. Michael is the St. Lucie County Economic and
Strategic Development Director. Mary Chapman mentioned the agenda for this meeting was
very thin. Mary Chapman said that she felt as though the major hurdle for this committee took
place in December. Ms. Hearn stated that the Waterfront Council would be open to any
comments that citizens may have. Ms. Hearn also said 99% of the community do not
understand the situation. The community thinks since the Cabinet ruled it was denied, it is all
over with. She said that the Waterfront Council is trying to put together something for
historical purposes, such as a timeline of events. Mary Chapman asked Ms. Hearn if she
thought it would be helpful if the Fort Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee did something in
terms of a letter. Howard Conklin stated that with Heather Young and outside council working
on the legal side of the situation, he thinks that all the Fort Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee
could do, would be to support their efforts and make sure their diligent.
Mary Chapman asked Michael Brillhart if he was attending the meeting for any particular
reason. Michael stated there was one item the County Staff would like to talk about, at the
staff level, from an economic development point of view. Staff has been fortunate enough to
talk with three developers over the last three weeks regarding hotel non-residential type
development in the generalized Fort Pierce area. The area surrounding Seaway Drive is very
potential. Michael said that one of the concerns regarding an RF.P. that has been brought to
Staff's attention, again by outside developers, is when you are looking at the 20 acres the
County owns the concern from the outside business entities is "What is realistically going to
happen to the property adjacent to it on the South?" From the developer's point of view, they
have to be cautious. They want to know what could happen to the property next to them.
Howard Conklin asked Michael how old his information was now that the permit application
.'
Fort Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee
March 8, 2007
Page 4
~._~~._""""-~--'--""""-"""""""'-~
had been denied. Michael said this is information from the entities that contacted him and that
they have shared locational information. Michael also said that the developers do not know
anything about what is taking place at Harbor Pointe. The developers are telling staff based
on a business point of view.
Ms. Hearn said that she though the Waterfront Council's concern was that when D.E.P. issued
a 60-day extension, all that did was "prolong the agony". They cannot get to a resolution
about Berth 4. Pieter Stryker said that something he thinks needs to be kept in mind is that
"it's not really accurate to imply that our interpretation of the use, or the potential use, of the
properties next to the location in question, our interpretation of what is going to stop any
development that would be incondusive to a Ritz Carlton. It's going to be the interpretation of
whoever is coming in to think about this. They may see what we think is a locked down
situation to where nothing is going to grow there but cactus. That would be fine to them, only
to find out that their interpretation of what their being presented with, relative to the potential of
that property is much greater from their analytical stand point." Pieter thinks that the
committee needs to keep in mind that it is not "our interpretation" of the restrictions on those
properties that makes the difference. It is the person, persons or developers that actually
have to be comfortable enough to say "Okay let's go ahead and do this." Howard Conklin said
that this is a governmental function and a function of Bell's activity. He also said that "The
perfect world is for an investor to even get assurance from Bell's entity that they would not do
this, this and this." Bell might go for it if there was an exchange. That could be an assurance
that would certainly convince a commercial developer that it would be okay to go ahead, if
they had a written assurance from the adjoining property owner. It would have to be a binding
assurance.
Ms. Hearn said that there is an island in the St. Lucie River called Idabelle Island. She said
that you enter the island from the east. Apparently this is a very environmentally sensitive
island of about 22 acres. Ms. Hearn was unsure of all of the details. Michael Brillhart said that
the County has been doing some research on Idabelle Island. Michael said that as many
people know, there is a portion of the North Fork that was purchased several years ago
through a County referendum. The County referendum was to help fund a grant through
South Florida Water Management District, therefore the County was able to purchase a large
portion of land. The County had some funds left over and they were used to purchase
Idabelle Island. He also said right now the County is trying to decide whether or not they can
go back through the bond referendum and use it as a "piece for sale." The County is currently
reviewing the contract they have with South Florida Water Management District through their
grant. Michael said that Bell does own a piece of property next to it and he is very interested
in it. The property is on the island, but it was not purchased through the South Florida Water
Management District grant.
Ms. Hearn asked if the County were to negotiate on Idabelle Island, would there be rigid
stipulations that it could not be used for perhaps, condominiums or something like that later.
She also asked if the island would remain as a scientific use. Michael said he could not say at
the time. He would have to go back and look through the legal documents and see when the
title was transferred to the County and what types of restrictions or ramifications were in it.
Ms. Hearn asked for a copy of the bond referendum. Heather Young said that she would get
her a copy.
Fort Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee
March 8, 2007
Page 5
Larry Storms said that he has thought about of all of the stated information. Larry agrees that
the developer's need to know what could be next door to them. The developers need
assurances. Larry said that he prefers to think of this in the context of, "What can you do as a
permitted use?" and make a list of what those things are. Then he would think about what is
noxious and what is not. Then he would think about the Rural Land Stewardship Program
and the creativity in it. Larry said the "Rural Land Stewardship Program is really a system by
which you essentially take off the permitted uses in layers and give credit for that." Larry said,
"This doesn't directly apply to this situation but could you possibly begin to buy off layers of
those noxious development opportunities?" Larry stated that he was thinking in more of a
methodology type way. Maybe layers could be taken off and Bell could be given "something"
for that so deed restrictions could then be put in place. The "something" mayor may not be
money or maybe a development credit. Larry stated that maybe there was something that
could be given as the noxious or obnoxious permitted use of the property to get it down to a
level where Bell could do something with the property that still makes economical sense to
himself, along with giving some assurances.
Ms. Hearn said she would like to think "if Harbor Pointe was developed, we would be giving
Bell a lot because the property would be much more valuable to an industry like positive
development rather than cargo development." Ms. Hearn felt as though "we are always put on
the what he's doing for us side. Just like his spoil site, Bell did it free. The man is getting a
tremendous amount of fill polished; it was nothing but concaved holes when it began. He has
had a tremendous amount of grading expenses free. But yet he did it free for us, but we don't
do anything for him. I think he has faired pretty well. The Waterfront Council feels like we
have made him a multimillionaire." Mary Chapman asked what Bell's last offer was. Howard
Conklin said he heard from reliable sources that it was in the 70's or 80's.
Howard Conklin spoke about the "Water Access Forum" that is scheduled for May 9, 2007 in
Norfolk, Virginia. He said Broward County and Palm Beach County have taken action on this
particular problem. Howard's concern is St. Lucie has not really paid attention to this creeping
problem. He thinks sending a staff member to this would be very useful. The forum would go
into the issues of what's happening around the Country, what's happening in Florida and what
are the remedies that the government could do to solve the problem. Mary Chapman asked
Heather Young if she could look into having a staff member attend. Heather said that she
would give the information to Doug Anderson. Howard Conklin moved to recommend the
County send a representative to this forum in May. The motion was unanimously approved.
The committee members looked at an aerial of Idabelle Island located South of Midway Road.
Mary Chapman asked where the Oxbox Center was in relation to Idabelle Island. Michael
Brillhart said it was quite a bit away from Idabelle Island. The island is actually South of the
Oxbow Center.
Howard Conklin asked Heather Young if she could give everyone an update on Chuck's
Seafood Restaurant. Heather said Mr. Angelos submitted plans to the City and the County
and the plans were being reviewed. She also said the City really does not want to do anything
with the plans until they have a signoff from the County. Howard Conklin asked if Mr. Angelos
would be putting in any dockage. Heather said no, he basically wants to rebuild the restaurant
building, which needs a lot of work. Mr. Angelos would also like to remove the tent structure
off the back of the building. Pieter Stryker asked about the parking. Heather said she thought
Mr. Angelos was going to go east with the parking and possibly a little toward the west side of
Fort Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee
March 8, 2007
Page 6
the building. Howard Conklin asked if a roundabout was going to be put in. Heather said she
was unsure. Ms. Hearn said when Harbor Isle was built, they put a pipe under A1A out into
the inlet. The pipe is totally covered during high tide. Ms. Hearn said the pipe should have a
marker or a light on the end. Ms. Hearn said she contacted the Coast Guard because she
thought they might be able to get a temporary marker when it first went in. Ms. Hearn asked it
there was anything the Fort Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee could do to try to get
somebody to do something about it. Heather Young said that she would get with staff
members and see what could be done.
5. ADJOURNMENT:
At 3:53 pm the meeting was officially adjourned. The next meeting will be held Thursday,
April 12, 2007 at 3:00 pm in Conference Room 3, on the third floor of the Administration
Building.
Respectfully submitted: Stephanie Bush
~
-
.
INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM
ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA
TO: Douglas Anderson, County Administrator
FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney 9t1
C.A. NO: 07-0428
DATE: March 8,2007
SUBJECT: Harbor Advisory Committee - Working Waterways and Waterfronts
Conference
During its meeting of March 8, 2007, the Harbor Advisory Committee voted to recommend
the County send a representative to the Working Waterways and Waterfronts Conference scheduled
for May 9-11, 2007 in Norfolk, Virginia. A copy of the information provided regarding the
conference is attached for your information.
me.
If you have any further questions with regard to this matter, please do not hesitate to contact
Attachment
HY/
Copy to: Harbor Advisory Committee
),,,//1
J . fl / fr
j 1\% rill .
/(1 (' p,J ¡-J'"
( if' ,J &(l.
9r/>'f'tJ,)J ¡7'
rf
.
'Water Access Is May Forum Theme
.
LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS, COASTAL-
management planners, legal scholars, and
marine-industry representatives will
gather at the Sheraton Norfolk Waterside
Hotel in Norfolk, Virginia, on May 9
through 11, 2007, to discuss the loss of
I
Those who rely on waterfront access are
increasingly losing out to development.
22
,
I
water access for recreational mariners,
commercial fishermen, and water-depen-
dent businesses. "Working Waterways
and Waterfronts" is the title of the confer-
ence that will examine the rapid conver-
sion of working waterfronts to residential
development and to businesses that aren't
dependant on the water. Rising real-es-
tate taxes and escalating property values
are driving the conversion.
Sponsors include the Sport Fishing &
Boating Partnership Council (www.fws.
gov/stbpcl), the Coastal States Organiza-
tion (wwW.coastalstates.org), BoatU.S.
(www.boatus.com). the National Marine
Manufacturers Association (www.nmma.
org), and the States Organization for
Boating Access (www.sobaus.org), under
the auspices of the Virginia Sea Grant
Program (www. virginia.edu/virginia -sea-
grant). For updated information, log on
to the conference website (www.water
access2007.com).
Him Marsh
vvaJ.u~ u,,", "............ -..., ............- ---~-----u
philosophy for children and p
Learning to Sail (for Adults) 1
~ emy of
Training
Acaden
itime
*1
www.m(
com). C
ing thi
prospe(
membel
rator,
Short, is considered to be one 0
preeminent sailing instructors.
why. The salty, avuncular Shor
Offshore and Coastal Yacht
structor, is a seasoned sailor. H~
down to his students as he ÿ
through the systems of the aca
;sel. The DVD's background
sounds of the sea are' consi
Short's calm approach, which
un intimidating atmosphere i
grasp the essentials of wha
daunting set of disciplines.
CRUISING WORLD FE
- 9