Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 10-28-03 ! ~ . BOCC Meeting October 28, 2003 PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS: 2A. Excess Revenue - Bob Davis 2B. Excess Revenue - Sheriff Mascara ~,,2C. Head Start - Iris Rivera & children from Head Start , \ PULLED ITEMS: None ADDITIONS: Consent Agenda C-A.l Attorney - Partial Release of Lien , , October 28, 2003 9:00 AM BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS MEETING AGENDA WELCOME ALL MEETINGS ARE TELEVISED. PLEASE TURN OFF ALL CELL PHONES AND PAGERS PRIOR TO ENTERING THE COMMISSION CHAMBERS. "<GENERAL RULES ANP PROCEDURES Attached is the ageñda which will determine the order of business conducted at today's Board meeting: CONSENT AGENDA- These items are-'èonsidered routine and are enacted by one motion. There will be no separate discussion of these items nilless a Commissioner so requests. REGULAR AGENDA ITEMS- Proclamations, Presentations, Public Hearings, and Department requests are items which the Comrmssion will discuss indiVidually usually in the order listed on the agenda. PUBLIC HÈARINGS- Theseìtem}are usually heard on the first and third Tuesdays at ì:OO P.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. However, if a public hearing is scheduled for a meeting on a second or fourth Tuesday, which begins at 9:00 A.M., tben public hearings \\1ll be heard at 9:00 A.M. or as soon thereafter as possible. These time designations are intended to indicate that an item will not be addressed prior to the listed tin1e. The Chairman vvill open each public hearing and asks anyope wishing to speak to corne forward, one at a time. Comments will be limited to five minutes. As a general rule, when issues are scheduled before the Commission under department request or public hearing, the order of presentation is: (1) County staff presents the details of the Board item (2) COlmnissioners comment (3) if a public hearing, the Chairman will ask for public cO!11l11ent, (4) further discussion and action by the Board. ADDRESSING THE COMMISSION- Please state your name and address, speaking clearly into the microphone. If you have backup material, please have eight copies ready for distribution. NON-AGENDA ITEMS- These items are presented by an individual Commissioner or staff as necessary at the conclusion of the printed agenda. PUBLIC COMMENT- Time is allotted at the begimÜng of each meeting for general public comment. Please lilnit CO!11l11ents to five minutes. DECORUM- Please be respectful of others opinion. MEETINGS- All Board meetings are open to the public and are held on the first and third Tuesdays of each month at 7:00 P.M. and on the second and fourth Tuesdays at 9:00 AM., unless othemise advertised. Meetings are held in the County Commission Chambers in the Roger Poitras Administration Annex at 2300 Virginia Ave., Ft. Pierce, FL 34982. The Board schedtùes additional workshops throughout the year necessary to accomplish their goals and commitments. Notice is prmided of these workshops. Assistive Listening Device is available to anyone "ith a hearing disability. Anyone ,,1th a disability requiring acco!11l11odation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County CO!11l11unity Services Director at (ìì2) 462-17ìì or TDD (ì72) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. \\'ì-V'\'\;. co.~t -lucie.fl.us John D. Bruhn Doug Coward Paula A. Lewis Frannie Hutchinson Cliff Barnes District 1 District 2 District 3 District 4 District 5 BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS October 28, 2003 9:00 AM. INVOCATION PLEDGE OF ALLEGLANCE . Special perfomwnce by Lawnwood Elementary School Physical Education Class of Ms. McClenny & Ms. Scotto 1"':-; .'" 1. I\-lINUTES . ' Approve the minutes of the meeting held October 21, 2003. . \- 2. PROCLA.MATIONS / PRESENTATIONS . ~. . E;xcess Revenue - Mr. Bob Davis, Tax Collector, \vill return excess tax revenues'to the Board of County Commissioners. B. Excess Revenue - Sheriff Ken Mascara will return excess tax revenues to the Board of County Commissioners. : C. Resolution No. 03-2ïS- Proclaiming the IT\onth of October, 2003 as "Head Start Awãreness Month" in St. Lucie County, Florida. D. Reading of the Announcements by the County Administrator .3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT 4. CONSENT AGENDA PUBLIC HEARINGS SA. There. are no public hearings schedtùed for October 28, 2003. End of Public Hearings NOTICE: An proceedings before this Boord are electronically recorded. Any person who decides to appeal any action taken by the Boord at these meetings wiH need a record of the proceedIngs and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuaJs testifying during a hearing wi!! be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted on opportunity to cross-examine any individual têstifying during 0 hearing upon request. Asslstive listening Device 15 ava1lable to anyone with a hearing disability. Anyone with a dîSQb1lity requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the Sf.lucie County CommunIty Servîces Diredor at (772) 462M 1777 or TDD (772) 462·1428 at least forty· eight{4$} hours prior to the meeting. 1/1) 1~~tf4~ 1ð~\<}\ì ,»Y' . l ~I,r/(d//; ,) v 1; ct( pI I/rf ~>,,/ f ~' f-',# r ~b~)~ '\ 1)1 . f~,J.~ esolution No. 03-2301 W~xler - Consider st f recommendation to appro /' JtS the resolution granting Major Site Plan Ap oval, subject to the condition )I/ contained therein, for the project to be ' own as Key West Bay located 0 v the sòuth side of Weatherbee Road, appr ximately 1,500 feet west of Sout US Hwy 1 and 1,000 feet east of pleande Avenue in the RM-11 (Residential Multiple-Family - 11 du/acre) Zoning D strict. REGULAR AGENDA OCTOBER 28, 2003 PAGE TWO ¡f/{J B. c 1). " Final Plat Approval 1 "Parcel 34, A-E @ The Reserve (The Lakes)" Plat - Consider staff recommendation to approve the Final Plat and authorize staff to complete the fiI}al prQ,cessim: of this plat. PGA Reserve 1 PGA Vill1tges - Staff will provide a Trans'portatioh Conditions and Status Update to the BoarJL-~-' ' Northeast.errr,St. Lucie County Greenways & ra1 s .onc'tptuah Plan Consider staff recommendation to accept the conceptual plan. Request for Renewal of Annual Grant and Additional Funding for the Treaso/e Coast Sports Commission:- Cops¥ier Tourist Development Council and"staff recommendation to appro'f'Jn increase in the TCSC yearly T9tirism ~ant from $30,000 to $35,000 and approve an additional $25,000 ,X'o the TCSC utilizing the County's Contingency Fund and authorize the I. Chairman to sign the agreement as prepared by the County Attorney. ' Ú f" St. Lucie County's Ad Valorem Tax Abatement Program - Consider staff t e0 recommendation to adopt Resolution No. 03-258 rescinding current l Resolution No. 02-196 and authorize the Chairman to sign Resolution No. 03-258. )~ v 9: Economic Development Update - Staff will provide an update to the Board. / / f7 Citizen Steering Committee for the North County Planning Charrette - Staff ,requests that the Board provide appointments to this c~mmitte,e.. 'J ro _ \ /l h 1. J M7,J!.A~JJ'; ? COUNTY AHORNEY '{Jilt C/"- r' ~ß-1>/7J,¿!'-~ Herman's Bay Beach Access 1 Exchange fór Alternate Beach Access Property 1 , /'/J Permission to Advertise - Consider staff reconm1endation to advertise a public /lii:¡Y hearing on November 25, at 7:00 pm to consider the proposed exchange of County pmp"". f¡jtu ¡lv H: .' ~ I) ,../ <t ljI' ß ú,..,ft tY6 fJ¡1t}c-j¡ fl1S, ÛfJfi4l,,) REGULAR AGENDA OCTOBER 28, 2003 PAGE THREE 8. ADMINISTRATION Þ I /~ /\j '//~ . ...... b- A. General Master's Contract - Staff recommends a 9-month extension of the agreement with Albert B. Moore for General Master services at a monthly salary of $7,500 and that the County Attorney make the necessary changes to this agreem~nt to be signed by the Board Chalrman. B. Biweekly Committee Reports - The Board will provide committee and advisory board updates. ;":< -:.. , , , ~', ,. ÇONSENT AGENDA October 28, 20Q3. 1. WARRANTS LIST Approve warrants list No. 56. Approve warrants list No.5. 2. PARKS & RECREATION A. Fort Pierce American League's request to be added to the Lawnwood User's List _ Consider staff recommendation to approve the request which will allm^( free use of the fields as schedlùing permits. B. Community Center Exterior Signs - Consider staff recommendation for approv,ù to transfer $4,400 in the Recreation Budget in order to complete the inst,ûlation·of exterior signs at the Lincoln Park and I;ort Pierce ComµlUnity Centers. C. Equipment Request No. 04-210 - Consider staff recommendation to approve the eqlùpment reguest for the purchase of a Topline Marking Iv!achine in the amount of $1,685. .;':< "J D.Donation of Stackable StaU Panels v,ith Composite Plate and Attachment Clips _ Co.nsider staff recommendation to recognize the donation by the Fair Association. E. Revised Equipment Request No. 04-116 / Budget Amendment No. 04-107 - Consider staff recommendation to' approve the revised equipment request (increase of $] 50) and the budget amendment for the purchase of a portable podium ,yith a battery-operated sound system. 3. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. Resolution No. 03-270 / Proclaiming the Month of November, 2003 as "Epilepsy Awareness Month in St. Lucie County, Florida - Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution and authorize the County Administrator to mail a copy to the Committee for Epilepsy Awareness. B. Revocable License Agreement / 177 NE Penlynn Avenue / Rabba - Consider staff recommendation to approve the agreement, authorize the Chairman to ~xecute the agreement and direct Mr. & Mrs. Rabba to record the document . in the Public Records of St. Lucie Cmmty, Florida. C. Revocable License Agreement / 505 SE Sandia Drive / Grant - Consider staff recommendation to approve the agreement, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct Mr. Grant to record the document in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. D. Permission to Advertise Petition for Abandonment / West Avenue "C" Jay Gardens _ Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to advertise a Public Hearing to be held on December 2, 2003 at 7:00 pm or as soon thereafter as possible. CONSENT AGENDA OCTOBER 28, 2003 PAGE FOUR Job Growth Investment Grant (JGIG) - Consider staff recommendation to approve the proposed amendments. 10. HUMAN RESOURCES Indian River Community College Training Program Consider staff recommendation to approve the contract and authorize the Chairman to execute the contract. 11. COM:tvfUNITY DEVELOPMENT .12. PARKS REFERENDUM >":< -~ , Acquisitiòn of the St. Lucie County Village Schoolhouse Heritage Trail Sites - Consider staff recommendation to authorize staff to set aside $300,000 from the Greenways portion of tJiè Parks Referendum for match to FCT and FRDAP to begin acquisition of the sites. , " . St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Announcements October 28, 2003 A. There will be a Public Hearing on October 28, 2003 at 1:00 pm in the Commission Chambers regarding Treasure Coast Tractor Services, Inc. / Treasure Coast Land Clearing. B. Meeting Changes for November, 2003 - o The November 4, 2003 Board of County Commissioners meeting will begin at 6:00 pm. r,;~ 0 The Board of County Commissioners meeting for November 11, 2003 will be cancelled, due to the holiday. o The November 18, 2003 Board of County Commissioners meeting will be changed to 9:00 am for the annÙal reorganization. o The November 25, ~003 Board of County Commissioners meetingwíll be changed to ì:OO pm. , C. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a workshop on November 12, 2003 at 2:00 pm in Conference Roam 3·to discuss Airport Issues and FLxed Based Operator Development at the Airport D. The Arts in Public Places Diclication Ceremony will be held on November 3, 2003 at 1:30 pm at Riverwalk Park, east of the Manatee Observ,ation and Education Center. E. The Board of County Commissioners, the City of Fort Pierce and FPUA wíll hold a joint Conflict ResolutÜm meeting on November 24, 2003 at 9:00 am in the Commission Chambers. F. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a workshop on November 24,2003 at 2:00 pm in the Commission Chambers to discuss Lakewood Park Stormwater Issues. G. The Board of County Commissioners will hold a public meeting on November 24, 2003 at 6:00 pm in the Commission Chambers to discuss the Urban Services Boundary. H. The Annual UDT Seal Muster wíll be held on November 8, 2003 at 11:00 am at the UDT Seal Museum on North Hutchinson Island. L The Annual "Party in the Park" will be held on November 8, 2003 from 10:00 am until 4:00 pm at fort Pierce Inlet State Park. This event is sponsored by the Conservation Alliance of , St LuCie County, the Savannas Reserve Endowment and the Fort Pierce Inlet State Park. The theme this year is "Awareness - Education - Protection" J The United States Navy Band Unit "Counny (urrent", a five member string ensemble will perform a free concert on November 15, 2003 ¡¡t 3:00 pm ¡¡t the Astor Summerlin Parking Lot adjacent to the Historical Museum. Free Shuttle Transportation will be provided from Lawnwood Sports Complex to the Concert from 2:00 pm to 6:00 pm. BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ADDITIONS AGENDA OCTOBER 28, 2003 CONSENT AGENDA C-A-1 Partial Release of Lien for St. Lucie County Code Enforcement Board Order Imposing Fine/Lien in Case No. 18318 dated June 4, 2003. Bob Davis, CPA, CGFO, CFC St. Lucie County Tax Collector P.O. Box 308 . Fort Pierce, Florida 34954-0308 \Vebsite: www.tcslc.com EmaîI: taxcollector@stlucieco.gov FORT PŒRCE County Administration Bldg. 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982-5652 (772) 462- 1 650 Fax (772) 462-2101 PORT ST. LUCIE City Center 9340 So. Federal Hwy. Port St. Lucie, FL 34952-2885 (772) 337-5600 Fax (772) 337-5624 October 27,2003 Re: Excess Revcnue tor the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003 Honorable Cliff Barnes, Cbairman St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 Dear Cbairman Barnes: In accordance witb Section 218.36(2), Florida Statutes, I am remitting to the Board of County Commissioners its sbare of excess revenue in the amount of $1,603,764.87 for tbe year ended September 30, 2003, Excess revenue is the unspent portion of my operating budget for the year plus the excess of tèes and commissions earned by the office not required for operating expenditures. This office's total excess revenue for the year is $2,029, I 40.87. This excess revenue is distributed back to taxing agencies based upon thc percentage of fees and commissions paid in proportion to the total income of tbis office. Attacbed to this letter is a detailed breakdown of the source of the revenue. If you have any questions regarding this report please contact me at 462-3559. Sincerely, ~;{)."...:, Bob Davis, CPA, CGFO, CFC St. Lucie County Tax Collector BD/pm cc: Commissioner Jobn Bruhn Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Paula Lewis County Administrator Douglas Anderson County Attorney Daniel McIntyre Finance Director Chris Hartley REAL ESTATE AND PERSONAL PROPERTY TAXES· TOURIST DEVELOPMENT '¡AX· OCCUPATIONAL LICENSE' ALARM PER-,-'vllTS MOTOR VEHICLES, VESSELS & MOBILE HOMES· HUNTING. FISHING & TRAPPING LICENSES Bob Davis, CFC S1. Lucie County Tax Collector Annual Report of Excess Revenue Distñbution For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30,2003 Taxinq Authoñtv/Revenue Source S1. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners State Agencies & Miscellaneous Income Tourist Development Tax Mosquito Control District S1. Lucie County Storm Water Management District S1. Lucie County Community Development MSTU South Hutchinson Island Waste Water MSBU Law Enfon:ement MSBU S1. Lucie County Erosion Control Districts Port Bond I & S Becker Road MSBU Treasure Cove Dune MSBU River Park Ughting Dis1. #1 King Orange MSBU Skylark #2 MSBU Meadowood MSTU #4 Port Expansion MSBU FFA Road MSBU Westglen Estates MSBU Driftwood Manor MSBU Timberlake Estates MSBU Revels Lane MSBU River Branch Est MSBU Paradise Park Ughting District #8 Indian River Estates District #12 Ideal Holding Road MSBU West First St MSBU Holidays Pines Ughting District #9 Palm Grove Ughting District #16 Smallwood Ave. MSBU King Orange #2 MSBU River Park Ughting District #2 Harmony Heights Ughting District #4 Raintree Forest MSBU Sunland Gardens Ughting District #8 North A1A MSBU Rouse Road MSBU Anita Street MSBU Kings Highway St Ughts Sheraton Plaza Ughting District #5 Lost Tree Estates MSBU Pine Hollow Street Ughting District Queens Cove District #13 Harmony Heights Ughting District #3 Briargate MSBU The Grove District #10 Sunrise Park Ughting District #7 Twin Oaks Trail MSBU Palm Lakes Gardens MSTU Southern Oaks District #126 Academy Dr MSBU Blakely Subdivision District #11 Port & Airport Authority Lakewood Park MSBU Total St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Excess Revenue Distñbuted 934,554.74 583,651.72 16,840.68 15,145.44 11,967.27 11,540.02 9,471.04 8,981.72 5,678.85 1,619.87 1,145.95 349.01 268.48 177.87 155.64 137.69 131.97 121.38 111.87 104.77 101.79 94.56 89.69 89.04 82.79 81.92 78.12 77.53 77.05 68.36 68.18 58.84 58.11 55.05 53.81 53.09 49.71 47.56 40.79 37.92 36.6930.59 28.90 23.42 19.48 19.43 14.39 14.28 13.89 12.97 10.55 8.68 7.45 4.26 1,603,764.87 Bob Davis, CPA, CGFO, CFC St. Lucie County Tax Collector Annual Report of Excess Revenue Distribution For the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2003 Page 2 of 2 Fort Pierce Storm Water 6,831.44 St. Lucie County Fire District 152,167.48 Childrens Services Council 22,287.27 Port S1. Lucie Storm Water Port S1. Lucie SAD 1, Phases 5,6,7A Port S1. Lucie SAD 1, Phases 3&4 Port S1. Lucie SAD 1, Phase 2 Port S1. Lucie Storm Water - S1. Lucie West Port S1. Lucie SAD 1, Phase 1 Port S1. Lucie Street Lights River Place Storm Water Total Port St. Lucie 60,366.41 24,682,89 36,683.02 12,438.87 6,626.32 4,030.93 781.78 241.87 145,852.09 South Florida Water Management District 39,829.81 St_ Lucie West Services District 20,169.47 Florida Inland Navigation District 2,193.64 North St. Lucie Water Management District 1,855.56 Ft. Pierce Farms Water Management District 303.12 Capron Trail Community Development District 6,361.56 Lake Lucie Community Development District 1,142.28 River Place on St. Lucie 4,079.79 School Voted Capital Improvement 16,529.58 Reserve Special Assessment Reserve Community Development District 2 Total Reserve 3,117,98 2,654.93 5,772.91 Total Excess Fees Distributed $2,029,140.87 In accordance with Section 218.36, Florida Statutes, I certifiy that I have distributed all excess revenue earned by my office as listed above for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2003. ~~ Bob Davis, CPA, CGFO, CFC Tax Collector, S1. Lucie County ID/;'7/ð3 . Daie From: To: Date: Subject: Pauline Mitchell Diane Turner 10/7/0311:05AM October 28th SOCC meeting Please place Bob Davis on the 9:00 a.m., October, 28, 2003 BOCC meeting agenda. If possible, please place him at the beginning Subject is: "Excess Revenue - Mr. Bob Davis, Tax Collector, will return excess tax revenues to the Board of County Commissioners". Thank you. Kindly call me at x3551 or email me with yout reply. Pauline Mitchell BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: October 23,2003 Tape: 1-3 Convened: 7:00 p.m. Adjourned: 10:09 p.m. Commissioners Present: Vice Chairman, Paula Hutchinson, Doug Coward, Cliff Barnes, absent A. Lewis, John D. Bruhn, Frannie Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Ray Wazny, Asst. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Paul Phillips, Airport Director, Bill Blazak, Utilities Director, Beth Ryder, Community Services Db'eetor, Don West, Public Works Director, Roger Shinn, Central Services Director, Detmis Murphy Community Development Director, Millie Delgado-Feliciano, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES (1-199) It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the minutes of the meeting held October 14, 2003; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. PROCLAMATIONS/PRESENTATIONS (1-330) A. Resolution No. 03-273- Commending the Woman's Club of Ft. Pierce on their 90th Anniversary. It was moved by Corn. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve Resolution No. 02- 273; and, upon roll call, motion calTied unanimously. B. The County Administrator read the announcements. 3. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS (1-407) Ms, Suzie GatTen, lndrio Road resident, addressed the Board regarding the urban services boundary and stated her opposition in extending the boundary line. Ms. GaJTen also commented on the Emerson Estates project aJ1d Portofino Shores development. The County Admil1istTator advised those present that there would be an update on the Urban Services Boundm-y Line at next week's BCC meeting. Ml-. John Arcna, Fl. Picrce, addressed the Taylor Creek muck removal and advised the Board of eqllipment (Numa Pump) being utilized ll1 other countries for this removal. Ms. Julie Orbin, Lakewood Park resident, addressed the Board regarding the Urban Service Boundary line and asked the Board not to extend the line to the area. The following Lakewood Park residents addressed the Board in opposition to moving the Urban Service Boundary Line to their area: Sean Reap, Lakewood Park Bill Stone, Lalœwooc1 Park Rose Mucildy, Lakewood Park Pat Body, Cabana Lm\e Corwin Body, Cab una Lane Gordon Case, Holiday Pines Pat Williams, Lakewooc1 Park Grant Denn, Lakewood Park Collin (unintelligible last name), Lakewood Park 1 Carl Bankard, Lakewood Park Robert Garren, Indrio Road It was tbe conscnsus ol'tbe Board to havc a public I11celing on the issue on Nov~mber 24, 2003 at 6:00 p.m. 4. CONSENT AGENDA (1-2756) It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the Consent Agenda with item C-4D moved to the regular agenda and to include the additions CA-l; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT UST Thc Board approvcd Warrant List No. 55 and No.4. 2. COUNTY ATTORNEY A. St. Lucie County Sports Complex/Joinder in Agreement between Sterling Facility Serviccs, LLC (FS) and Rodda Construction,- The Board approved the Joinder and 'authorized the Chainnan to sign the Joinder. B. Art in Public Places Program/St.' Lucie Marine Center Project- The Board approved declaring the September 19, 2003 Agreement for Artist Services with Patrick Cochran and Gi1IDY Piech Street and the October 7, 2003 Assignment of the Agreement to Shadetree Studios null and void. The Board also approved the proposed Agreement for Artist Services with Shadetree Studios, and authorized the Chairman to execute the agreement. C. Air Charter of Florida Inc.,- Conscnt to Proposcd Ground Sublease with Ari-Bn Aviator - Inc., the Board approved the Ground Sublease. D. Equipment Request No. 04-211 Budget Amendm.ent No. 04-106- The Board approved the equipment request and budget amendment for the purchase of a movable filing system. 3. PUBLIC WORKS A. Lakewood Park Stonnwater Pennit Modification- The Board approved Work AuthorizationNo. 4 in the amount of $19,900 with Hazen and Sawyer Engineers & Seientists as amended, adding Pmiofino Shores, for the Lrl1œwood Park Permit Modification, and authOllzed the Chairman to sign the eontract. 13. Rcqucst 0[' Anchor Bay Dcvblopmcnt, 1nc., 1'01' (1n cxcmption from the rcquircnwnls of Section II.02.Œ) (A) (5) S1. Lucie County Land Devclopmcnt Code, 10 prepare an Environmental Impact Rcport for thc projcct to be known as Ocean Bay ViIlas- Thc Board approved the exemption and that no environmerltal impact report be required for this proj ect. C. Sod Instal1ation/Orange Avenue from I-Ieader Canal to County Line- The Board approved an amendment to Work Authorization No.8 with Nature's Keeper, Inc., to increas~ the amount to $34,004.40 extended the completion time to October 3 i, 2003 and authorized the Chainnan to sign the Work Authorization. 2 /. 10/15/03 F'l:1\.BW1\.RJ::l FUND 001 001149 001152 001155 001273 001274 001809 101 101002 101003 101211 102 102001 105 107 l07001 l07003 107127 109 . 115 121 - "\ J001 140126 160 183001 183002 183215 185002 185003 215 310002 315 316 316201 362 382 401 418 421 441 451 458 461 471 478' !"n<:; 001 611 625 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD WARRANT LIST #55- 09-0CT-2003 TO 15-0CT-2003 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund Section 112/MPO/FHW1\./Planning 2004 Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab 02/03 USDOJ Violence Against Women Grant TRIP Grant FY03 FDCA Erner Mgmt Prep & Assis FY03 SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Local Option FDEP Canal & Stormwater Retrofit Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU. Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper USDOJ Edward Bryne Drug FY03 Drug Abuse Fund Sheraton Plaza Fund Blakely Subdivision Fund Port & Airport.Fund Port Fund Taylor Creek Restoration Dredging P Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin.-County Arbitration/Mediat OSCA Traffic Infraction FY02/03 SHIP Housing Assistance FY 01/02 FHFA SHIP FY02/03 Sales Tax Revenue Bonds I&S Fund Impact Fees-Parks County Building Fund County Capital FDEP/FRDAP Savanna Rec Phase II Sports Complex Improv Fund Environmental Land Capital Fund Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities S. Hutchinson utilities Fund SH Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin No Cty Util"Dist-Renewal &'Repbce Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty InsuranceF\md Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund) Law Library . GRAND TOTAL: I. \, EXPENSES 175.1350.61 10.44 390.09 12,014.38 106,028.52 31,986.42 152.95 55,376.51 1,896.61 11,386.67 290.00 11,850.02 35.70 1,374.85 180,977.34 316.25 574.22 17,959.36 35.00 455.56 71. 07 2,434'.91 200.00 48,540.00 675.37 158.34 555.00 1,720.00 158.17 250.00 60.00 1,975.00 32,462.85 16,129.93 3,366.00 15,380.00 6,750.00 220,460.00 2,646.18 43.24 40,303.44 20,856.72 315.09 8,780.77 19.80 1,275.50 54,523.85 37.98 2,500.00 1,128.71 1,092,239.42 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 150.00 0_00 0_00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0,00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 O.oq 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00. 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,160.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 1,310.22 10/17/03 F'7.ABWARR FUND 001 001137 001148 001149 001152 001274 001281 001809 101 101002 101215 102 102001 102105 105 107 107001 107002 107CT03 140 140001 , 183 183001 183004 185003 185004 235 310201 316 , 39003 401 418 421 441 448 449 451 458 461 471 478 479 481 491/ .''''<; 001 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD WARRANT LIST jf 4- 11-0CT-2003 TO 17-0CT-2003 FUND SUMMARY TITLE EXPENSES General Fund Zora Neala Hurston Dust Tracks Heri CSBG Grant FY03 Section 112/MPO/FHWA/planning 2004 Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab 02/03 FDCA Emer Mgmt Prep & Assis FY03 FL Fishing & Boating Heritage SFWMD-Floridian Aquifer Well 01/04 Transportation Trust. Fund Transportation Trust/80% Constitut FDOT Traffic Signal System Grant. Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU. FDOT Bicycle/pedestrian Coordinator Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Fine & Forfeiture Fund-E911 Surchar Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper Port & Airport Fund Port Fund Plan Maintenance RÀD Fund. SLC Housing Finance Authority Fuhd Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat Ct Admin_- Teen Court FHFA SHIP FY02/03 FHFA SHIP FY03/04 Becker Road I&S Fund FDEP/FRDAP Ancient Oaks County Capital Revels Lane1 MSBU Capital Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities NHI' Util-Renewal & Replacement'Fund NHI Util - Capital Facilities Fund S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund SH Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin No Cty Util Dist-Renewal & Replace No Cty Util Dist-Capital Facilities Airport Utilities District Building Code-Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/casualty Insurance 869,268.14 46.48 353.85 3,403.97 568.82 128.65 654.10 181.02 77,069.07 13,717.90 320.00 27,052.93 2,132.41 583.84 2,317.03 62,057.28 17,159.28 508.75 9,481.86 12,783.77 100.77 1,526.19 . 550.00 2,016.04 932.50 1,209.84 335.00 703.13 16,412.50 2,468.00 29.86 519.00 26,889.17 20,743.52 90.05 1,462,89 138.48 175.41 878.88 264.63 8,035.10 1,747.61 140.24 113.77 7.61 21,162.72 ,749.12 ,898.78 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0_00 0.00 0.0.0 0.00 0_00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 o.oå 0.00 0.00 4,880.92 0.00 , " '. ¡ , i -I ¡ j I , ·1' I: I , ,{ 10/17/03 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE F'7.ABWARR WARRANT LIST # 4- II~QCT-2003 TO l7-0CT-2003 FUND SUMMARY FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 611 Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund 2,739.78 0.00 615 Impact Fees Fund 698.88 0.00 625 Law Library 623.00 0.00 650 Agency Fund 7,275.07 0.00 693 Westglen MSBU 2,685.89 0_00 GRAND TOTAL: 1,226,112.58 4,880.92 i. .- - . ( 2 ., I 1 ¡ I 1 I ;1 .....1., ':1 "I' 'II .\'; ,.1. ':.\. . 4. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Resolution No. 03-236/Rinker Materials Corporation- The Board approved the resolution subject to the cited conditions contained therein, granting approval for a Major Adjustment to an existing Major Site Plan to allow the construction of an additional 25,835 square feet of industrial space at the existing Rinker concrete Plant for property locatcd in the lH zoning district. B. Tourism/Simple Success Marketing Invoices- The Board approved payment of the invoices for the month of September 2003 in the amount of$9,634.22. C. Tourist Development CounciJ/Agreement with Simple Success Marketing Inc. for Advertising Services- The Board approved the second year extension and authorized the Chainnan to sign the agreement upon rcceipt of the signed originals from Simple Success Marketing, Inc. D. This item was moved to the regular agenda E. Resolution No. 03-235/Las Palmas Subdivision- The Board approved the resolution, subject to the cited conditions contained therein, granting approval for a Major Site Plan to be known as Las Palm as Subdivision. S. CENTRAL SERVICES Reallocation of Funds/Budget Amendment No. 04-10S/Equipment Request No. 04-209- The Board approved the budget amendment and equipment request to reallocate funds in the amount of $600 for the purchase of an ice machine at a cost of$2,376. 6. ADMINISTRATION Art in Public Places Commiitee Appointmellt- The Board ratified Com. Coward's appointment of Bill Ward to the committee as a replacement for Jon Ward, who is no longer eligible to serve as a committee member. 7. INVESTMENT FOR THE FUTURE Sl. Lucie County Parking Garage Expansion Prpject- The Board approved the use of $7,500 Centrnl Services Project Rcserves, to enter into a eontn1ct with Reynolds, Smith and HilJs, Inc., for the Structural Engineering Analysis Services and authorized lhe Chairman to sign the conlracl. CA-l Parks & Recreation- The Board approved the request for approval to serve alcohol at the Indrio School HOllse Facility/Park at the request of the Teamsters Local 769 on October 25, 2003. REGULAR AGENDA 5. COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT A. Rcsolution No. 03- 181/ Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting the request of Robert C. Sehwebke, through agent Harold Melville, Esq., for a variance from the provisions of Section 6.02.02(B) (2) and (C) (1) (shoreline protection) to pem1it the 3 construçtion of an access ro¡¡dway lacking 50 feet of the required 50 foot shoreline setback for property located adjacent to the Indian River Lagoon for the residential project to be known as Pelican Bay, located on North Hutchinson Island" B. Resolution No. 03-182 /Consider staffri':commendation to approve the resolution granting the request of Robert C. Schwebke through agent Harold C. Melville Esq., for a major site plan approval for the rcsidential project to be known as Pelican Bay. It was moved by Com. Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward to continue items 5 A and 5B on Tuesday November 4, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible; and, upon roll call, motion carricd unanimously. C. Resolution No. 03-232 T & T Land, LTD.- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting a Change in Zoning to the IL for property located east side of Kings Highway. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by ·<::;om. Hutchinson, to approve Resolution No. 03-232; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. D. Resolution No. 03-233 Gethard Kampichler- Consider staff Recommendation to approve the resolution granting a Change in Zoning from CN to CG for property located at 1123 N. 33rd Ms. Lana Brown, business partner and petitioner, addressed the Board on this item. Ms. Estelle Dunn, 3204 Kentucky Ave. presented the Board with a petiiion ITOm the SUlTOlmding residents stating their opposition to the change in zoning due to chemical and safety issues. Mr. Don Long, Neyra Industries (company proVid;hg product) addressed the Board and advised them there were no health hazard concerns with the product. Ms. Louise Johnson, Kentucky Ave., resident"addressed the Board in opposition to the change in zoning due to what she felt would be a traffic hazard in the area for the children. Ms. Ruby Hollomon, Kentucky Ave., resident, addressed the Board in opposition to the change in zoning. Com. Coward stated his opposition to the rezoning due to the fact this change would permit any other type of business in the area should the owners deeide to sell the property and also felt it was too close to a residential area. , It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff recommendation, and; upon roll call, the vote was as fòllows: Nay: Coward; Aye's: Bruhn, Hutchinson, Lewis; motion carried by a vote of3 10 1. E. Resolution No. 03..234- Fin,l lktptist Church of Ft. Pierce- Consider staff recommendation to approve the resolution, subject to three limiting conditiops, grantirlg a Conditional Use PCnllit to allow Educational Services and Facilities in the I and RF zoning distriets for property located at 4500 S. 25'h St. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by CqÍ1l. Bruhn, to approve Resolution No. 03- 234; and, upon roll caJl, motion canied unanimously. 4 C4-D Resolution No. Q3Q237/0cean Bay ViIIas- Çonsider staff recommendation to approve the resolution granting approval for a Major Site Plan to be known as Ocean Bay Villas with the HIRD Zoning District. The Board advised everyone present of their discussions with Ms. Dwyer and Mr. Virta. II was moved by Com, Bruhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. (¡. COUNT'y' ^'ITORNEY (2-úO'J) Teague Property/Option ^grcemcnt/ ^uthorizlltion to Ncgotillte- Staff rccommends that thc Board authorizc staJT to negotiate an option agreement with Teague for subsequent Board approval with tbe purchase price based on appraisals obtained by the County. It was moved by Com. Bmhn, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve staff recommendation; and, upon roIl call, motion carried unanimously. 7. ADMINISTRATION (2-1181) A. Request for Renewal of the Bus Bench Agreement for 3 years with Metropolitan Systems, Inc., to benefit the Fort Pierce Jaycees, Port St. Lucie Jaycees, United Way, Boy's and Girls Clubs and Big Brother's Big Sisters- Staff recommends the Board consider the request to extend the Bus Bench Agreement with Metropolitan Systems, Inc, for 3 years. Mr. Andrew Moose, Jaycees, addressed the Board regarding the accountability and insurance papers requested. Ms, Pamela Hamerik, Jaycees addressed the Board and provided information on lhe benefit lhe benches provide to her org¡mization. Ms. Susan Schwerer, River Park Homeowners; addressed the Board in opposition to keeping the benches in the area and through out the county. Mr. Waller Deemer, River Park Homeowners also addressed the Board in opposition to keeping the benches. Com. Coward concurred with the River Park Homeowners and stated he too felt the benches were eye sores and ugly and did not do anything for the county's quality ofHfe. Com. Bruhn slaled he did not have a problem with the benchcs and il' a homcowners association did not wish to have them in their area., they could be removed. However, be would likc to see more money going towards the chari lies. Com. Hutchinson stated she would like to see more astringent reeord keeping as opposed to handwritten reports and would also like to see a repOlt of tile monies reeorded which were given to the ehariiies. It was moved by Com. Hutchinson, seconded by Com. Coward to direci staff to proceed with an RFP or RFQ to be brought baek for the Board's review along with the requested information and also to tenninate the lease at this time; and, upon roll call, the vote was as follows: Nay: Bruhn; Aye's: Coward, Hutchinson, Lewis; motion earried by a vote of 3 to l. B. Requesi for Approval for Installation of a Chilled Water System at the Thomas J. White Stadium- Consider staff recommendation to approve funding for lhe new ChiJler Systehl. 5 .:;Pþ September 27,2003 To St. Lucie County Commissioners: We concerned citiiens are signing this petition to oppose the rezoning at 1123 S. 33rd Street from CN to CG for reasons as stated. 1. We feel that a zone change would allow the company to introduce a health hazard into our neighborhood, with fumes from chemicals that could possibly lead t9 medical problem-s. Yes, we could file lawsuits against the company for creating a health hazard, but no doHar amount can be compared to good health. 2. We also fear for the safety of our children. We feel that with the traffic flow this rezoning could or would generate, is a safety issue, because the entrance and exit to said property is directly in front of a bus stop. We feel that no amount of safe driving or considerate drivers is going to prevent an accident. This rezoning puts our children in harms way and we would like to avoid any child getting hurt. Commissioners please do not allow this rezoning to take place. Do not let this happen to our neighborhood. There are many industrial Parks waiting for customers. This is not the place. " Thank you, Concerned Citizens / . ,. .- ,'., ., " \ . PETITIONERS Name Address Phoneil ~2.·l-.dL~_~]:)...I.l.1'J.t:L . ·àJ.D.!Ljd,í?!n:L-I,¿~_B:..\,Lrf.JI :f.f£;¿~'j;¿::f'f -.D..lLJJ1Jb¡.-~bt~:...c:¡ror-ç:î-___";'l.QJ_-.Jt.::.,-S!' 1--cJ--,E±"':~~"--T!2-_-_'iý:::?- -0 GCSJ . '. 3~n W..:Jk-t____5_I:2!1k__ 3.lQl.-:J£.l2if)__Ç-l_____~ _'-L~~=¿¿3_ó ß~~~~ ~J:;;;~ ~- ~~ú . -[¡,-:I ~~!3::fL.æ.ç/oI _. 31-q '--I __ Je/š¥-Ç:6____ _~~ s - ~ð¿) (f ~J.}L _lflfljJJL- -321ºjL~;¡5Lu~JiJLe___ ! 3Lf :.9/8- S{ _¿iili::1iYy 1& / -:.(2.2 73 df~ - kßJ Œl8-~~-C__ 1k7:!:55J3' ~ . k¡!n ~c2¡¿~_C:t-_____ ~º-=3Jl9 J ~ -'-----u-- 2;2Q7 ~_ .=lì£'¿:9'=85 ~~-- iJfJ- ßJ.QjŠ~___ ~~6:;J7:J' ~i~YJp· 3i!_0-~_ -- ----- ~ --~~- f~~øÞ- · JlI¿ ~ ---------~~~- ___~~-!-~- ~_1 () i>Y I~L§J!_.J!.___:zt_ _ _________ ~~~ _i~JL Ji~G~-~- _________ 2l~j-?J~-Wø _:lP-¿f}j~~?¿~_dJiL --------- , ~-~dtß~--- JLi!i_-.!/EðÙs:JL__t::.1!Z- -- -----.---- ¿¡ßJ2.__C}¿~____ _~¿~/l1.dr.!f--&~-- ---------- ~~-~45 ~3!f:;Þf/wâ(;Z-.t!£~-- _________ é~-~.f-~- ~~j_;;:~~r!~-Æt:----- ---------- ¡Q~~¿7 JdO~__4t1c-!Ii1x¿Of Name \ , PETITIONERS Address Phone# _¿¿)1i~_~~~~~~______ _l?2tJ~_JL__~ _JPÞ2~_~____ _2t~_!dc ktJ ~__~L_____ ---------- ------- -------- -------- '3 J ð 2.- );J.o) ~--L±._~____ !i~i:.:£27 c¡ · 3-Lº.:f.:L:J~Oß._C.±~____ }i.Ý!J.:;3_LCg 3¡plLI.'r}~~t______ )¡.f¿z:=Þ5.r]) Cf , J.lr¿1--~-~--- ~i- 7¡1o _:Lº_ö~~L~ __ :/£_f~~ ~Ú'Y'~44-- ~~qThd~__ º¿ï~j0 ~4-t:mJ4 22LJ -1-----q¿S~ ~~~¡5~3~(~~!1"2~~7b Name ~ _ rnè-0heJd¿e.._ ~~ ~ fJ~ -------------------- I , PETITIONERS Address Phone# . .3Lé!S__.;r;..g,¡~~_~<LJ_£f 4:!tl-l.::_&5'r :2!?Zª__::1ií.¿t2M!/:=_C!L_______ L~ ---- ~ ~flS..:õ..Jj~CLð 3-<..eL;I;nch~O'JJ__LL____ .5:1£J5.!:I1 ___S~·.-3~Q:VLtj!? ¡(1~ 0+-------- . .., I . PETITIONERS Name Address Phone# _~_lLæ[{ ._~6~_¥-jÞ ____ ~~ _J..U;¡.._Jl~~Çi1..S:d9. Vt;.L_ _________ l._À:.L-JJ:; rç) N--;:)'î.:.()"t· ~~--IJ-¡l---- . __ ______ 3~Q_tfj·b~~~L~~t~_~_ __________ ~-i1l1fil@I0 ~d !.!:f ~fizh.¿.;æÉ~tL 4h.;z_¿¡Zd;}.... ~ s;;:u.s- ~b$ i!u.A Iø:-- ~1:.;;Yd)6 ~~ _:¿2jÍ_¡¿'i'JrJ{Jr-b~__ fti::.0atJ ..fJ-~'l1L¿ 3 :;:1."1 ~tÅJv<.." 'jJçS'...o ?}L ~. . ~ . c 3~D7 ~~ 40(P-~5èI - --- ------------------------ ------- -~t-~ BlO ~'~__1i_2j)ý ~7fL:5' ð _~_~ _JL 0 [J:lLblS0.lAS·b~L _~0.KJJl ct r¡ ~ 31éf) Hi bì<;;cJJst\vc __1-)~:Có5S-- .' \ . PETITIONERS Name Address Phone# ~~~ .~-~~-- (tLf:~fg;/ _¿02£;;;¿~f::¿; __¿'{L~'l:..2~~~~ __f£~~f!'/~o5' -l1 . al- ;:I1,.ljJ'5.e&{¡¿~-#/)i2~ akisdJ13¿ , . i~_~~__f}JJ£+____ ~B W ~ 71 0 cr Þe ß-l C(fi(f) J-~ç-c --------------- ---------------------- --------- df-O£fß&fQ~ 3iL'r2imIM.l: '1---- -'m:im~ ~~ 3!ó( ·ktfJ1-rC/fllfiþ~__ß/bs_:I!.-<1_' ~-~~ JJ¡n~_ _10s~.PýJ0, ~~__ ';$¡ð t¡~~-AVJ~_____ !:&~:.Z1Jg .)š:/2.ª-~(l~JJ/'? .3J o¿k-ey?fygYJ~ -.f/kzj~V 2-9 -¡¿fJø"jL&r~L7 3;;«~d.~-L~__'!-:~__ £,?.£~~e[ý'ýl ~(~ 3~L\!-X~:pw~J{--~----- _:J tS_-..î'J..l...2/ . I , PETITIONERS Name Address Phonc# LÜ'-- M1Ajf!µ/LlL'31iflJ1í----- Ljk£~_ 7f Ö- .c..fti1d~_êd{J.r _JillO -lbn~k~¿,-__ ¿ 6.~d2JðG o ,~~. C1-rl - . /J 4&-9'5'5 ?¿ -r~~---~1L_-L/_f)-fL--~/Çjj!()_'kŒ ~-¥ft¿~~ ßtJ¥~4'er'~---76¿7~/Jß' , ';VI;' I dad_~£n_~ fA JJJL~-.:.f{~Ü cl: _0~_ _'-l.?_~:::_i!l2:2 O}-' t"\ ~ c ~±L~UV --Ü~J+-u~'\ tiVL tIL-l _4 f?:: çú) If Sf\. ~ '-" c T fm12Rf~___LJ.J.J;¿_JikJ:!:7_'_~ø._ c 1 /I, J.L~lz_~if 3) f .ße_~.iJjCllJ-_~¡it~..L- _._LLlJLiifJ1ILQ.r;;):;__ç:L..LdJ: !:!.~!:[::J)2.3 7 .~~Llj-,~ç__Th_I6.D(\ b-L_1LLL_MøJ:~çl:=__<;J)::. !it:..2:::_?J-C! LtL1..\f,~C___ _aLl ~i{¿çt(!ßi.f?__ :L~:¡- ~2i2- . ~_~~ jJ2Z.Jf.f!2fl~~ ~-{m _~lQ~~ß_~~ J.13D tk.1ilD{:j{=_Wci£- itJ~l' Name ~~--- ----------------~ --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- --------------------- -------------------- --------------------- ----------------- ---------------- -------------------- -------------------- PETITIONERS Address ~- ---------------------- ---------------------------- -------------------------- ---------------------------- -------------------------- ---------------------------- ------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------- ---------------------- ------------------ Phone# ~_.:2;:'.2 9' ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- -------- --------- --------- ---------- , --------- -------- ---------- -------- It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve staff reeommendation; and, upon roll call, motion earried unanimously. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourued. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court 6 AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ J TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. Mcintyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 03-275 - Proclaiming the month of October, 2003, as "HEAD START AWARENESS MONTH" in Sf. Lucie County, Florida. BACKGROUND: Head Start is a comprehensive, family-oriented child development program for low-income families. Since its establishment on May 18, 1965, Head Start has provided comprehensive health, educational, nutritional, emotional and social services to more than 1,000,000 children and their families nationally through 2, I 00 locally- bascd programs. This Board has been requested to proclaim the month of October, 2003, as Head Start Awareness Month in St. Lucie County. The attached Resolution No. 03-275 has been drafted for that purpose. FUNDS A V AIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 03-275 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: ,I] APPROVED [] DENJED [ ] OTHER: -1;1. d (4 O'¡ Bruhn-Absent Approve - County Attorney: Originating Dept. ~.. r Review and Approvals Management & Budget Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable)_ Purchasing Other: Eff. 5/96 RESOLUTION NO. 03-275 A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING THE OF OCTOBER, 2003, AS "HEAD AWARENESS MONTH" IN ST. COUNTY, FLORIDA MONTH START LUCIE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Head Start is a comprehensive, family-oriented child development program for low-income families. 2. Since its establishment on May 18, 1965, Head Start has provided comprehensive health, educational, nutritional, emotional and social services to more than 1,000,000 children and their families nationally through 2,100 locally-based programs. 3. The support of this community has made possible a local Head Start Program, under the leadership of Mary T. Jones, to provide services to 731 children and families in the year 2002 at the Hill Haven, Lincoln Park, George W. Truitt, Village Green, Morningside, Garden Terrace and Francina Duval Centers. 4. The George W. Truitt Family Services Center has been completely renovated to serve Head Start and an additional 36 infants and toddlers and 4 pregnant women in the Early Head Start Program. 5. ALPI Head Start continues the partnerships with Loving Care Child Development. The Learning Tree Academy, Inc. , Gingerbread Lane, Precious Lambs Kiddie Kollege, Sunrise Country Preschool and Wee Wuns Tu and Wee Wunds Kuntry Klub to serve the additional 157 children resulting from our expansion efforts. '- ....,; \ 6. ALPI Head Start cont inues to demonstrate del i very of quality services by obtaining accreditation for the centers directly owned and operated by ALPI and partnering with providers that are also accredited through the National Association for the Education of Young Children or The Florida Association for Child Care Management. 7. Major research findings document the program's lasting positive effects on children and their families. 8. ALPI Head Start is accepting the challenge to take human services to a new level by "Impacting the Future" and raising the bar on performance outcomes, National Reporting Systems and school readiness. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida that the month of October, 2003, is hereby proclaimed as "HEAD START AWARENESS MONTH" during their thirty-seventh birthday celebration in St. Lucie County, Florida. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 28th day of October, 2003. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY "'- ..J AGENDA REOUEST ITEMNO.ß DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [X] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. Mcintyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 03-275 - Proclaiming the month of October, 2003, as "HEAD START AWARENESS MONTH" in St. Lucie County, Florida. BACKGROUND: Head Start is a comprehensive, family-oriented child development program for low-income families. Since its establishment on May 18, 1965, Head Start has provided comprehensive health, educational, nutritional, emotional and social services to more than 1,000,000 children and their families nationally through 2, I 00 locally- based programs. This Board has been requested to proclaim the month of October, 2003, as Head Start Awareness Month in St. Lucie County. The attached Resolution No. 03-275 has been drafted for that purpose. FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 03-275 as drafted. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [ ] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Douglas Anderson County Administrator ..... //~- ~' if ~( ~\ ~ ~ ~1:J !}~ã ..... ReloJutto. Noo__ ,,< .~ A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF OCTOBER 2002 AS "HEAD START AWARENESS MONTH" IN ST, !otIC [ COUNTY. PLORlDA \ , WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissione" of SI. Lucie County, Florida, has made the - .....following determinatioM: 1. HwJ S!ðrt.is a è"mprebensive, family·oriented child development program for low-moo'''"' families. . 2. Since its emhlishment on May 18, 1965, He~d Start h.. pro,ide<! comprehensive health, educational, nutritional, emotional and social services to ~re than 1.000,000 children and their famiUes national1y thròugh 2,1000 locaUy-base<! programs, ' 3. The .upport of thi. conunwlÍty has mule possible a lôcal H~ Start Progn¡m, unda-the leadmhip of Mary T. Jones, 10 pro'ide services to 731 children and families in the ~ar 2002 at the Hill Haven. Lincoln Park, George W. Truitt, Villagt Green, Momingside, Oarden Terrace and Francina Duval Centers. 4. The George W. Truitt FamilyServices Center Iw been conlpletelyrenovated to serve Head Start and an additional 36 infants and toddlers and 4 pregnant women in the Early Head S!ðrt Progr=. 5. ALP! HwJ Start continues the partnerohips with Loving Care Child Development, The Leanung T roe Academy, Inc., GingerbreOO Lane, Precious Lamb. Kiddie Kol1ege, Sunzise Country Preschool and W", Wuns Tu and Wee Wons Kuntry KJub 10 serve the additional 157 children resulting from OUI expansion efforts. 6. ALPI Head Start continues to demonstrate delive'Y of quality services by obtaining accseditation for the coolers directly owned and openUed by ALPland portnering with providers that ATe also accredited Ihrough 1he National As<ociation for tho Education of Young Children or The Florid. Association for Child C~ Manasement 7. Major research fmdings document the program's Issting positive effects on children and their families. 8. ALPI HwJ Start is """"ptinS the cballenge to tako hurœn services to a new level by "Impacting the Future" and rai&ing the bar on perfortnallCC oUIOomes, National Reporting Systems and school readiness. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Conunissioners of St Lucie County, Florida that the month of October 2003 is hereby proclaimeðas "HEAD START A W ARF~'ŒSS MONTH" dutiog their thirty.seventh birthday celebration tn St Lncie County, FJorida. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTEDtha _day of Octobcr 2003, A TIEST: BOARD OF COUI'I"IY COMMISSIONERS ST, LUCIE COUNTY. FLORIDA ,.ccc.ce;.., c..,=~~ ç~n?lçv!~T ~J/¡' 3¡,2ßa3 a9: 45 465055: L~ PA('£ al ..... ..J .. ,--, -!~ D(OJUL ) ¡UV(/( C~ (rBf" 1 Tv! S fi;u[r~ Lf~) G ~ ;JLo -3) - ..... ! ,1" ..." (c- ~\ Agenda Request Item Number Date: ~ 10/28103 .. '. Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [X] [ ] " To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development A SUBJECT: 1"~ _~ Con.sider Draft Resolution 03·230 approving the request of Gregg Wexler through agent Henry Kaye, for Major Site Plan Approval for the project to be known as Key West Bay, a 77·unit multiple.family residential project. , ,. . , Petition of Gregg Wexler through agenl Henry Kaye, Ésquire to consider Draft Resolution 03·230, which would grant Major Site Pian Approval'Jor the project to be known as Key West Bay to allow for the development of ¡¡ 77·unit, multiple·family project in 11 buildings on 10.01 acres of property located on the south side of Weatherbee Road, approximately '~,500 feet west of South U.S. Highway No.1 and j ,000 feet east of Oleander Avenue in the RM·11 (Residential, Multiple·Family - 11 du/acre) Zoning District. (File No: MJSP.03. 007) BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: While staff has significant reservations relative to the site design as it relates to existing on site vegetation, staff finds that the site plan as presented meets the County's minimum technical standards and, therefore, recommends approval of Draft Resolution 03-230, subject to the conditions contained therein. COMMISSION ACTION: o APPROVED 00 OTHER CONCURRENCE: o DENIED Request to continue to 12/09/03 Approved (4-0) Bruhn-Absent \1:"/ ;'\'!. ~ " County Attorney ·~D,:,."" Originating Dept.: Finance: .....vordinatìonl Signatures Mgt. & Budget Other: Purchasing: ~ Other: ~ " "'" """ Commission Review: October 28, 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Planning DivIsion MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Community Development Director DATE: October 22,2003 SUBJECT: Petition of Gregg Wexler through agent Henry Kaye for Major Site Plan Approval for the project to be known as Key West Bay - Draft Resolution 03-230. LOCATION: South side of Weatherbee Road, approximately 1,500 feet west of South U.S. Highway No. 1 and 1,000 feet east of Oleander Avenue. EXISTING ZONING: RM-11 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 11 du/acre) FUTURE LAND USE: RH (Residential High) PARCEL SIZE: 10.01 acres SURROUNDING ZONING: SURROUNDING LAND USES: FIRE/EMS PROTECTION: UTILITY SERVICE: TRANSPORTATION IMPACTS: Right-of-Way Adequacy: RM-11 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 11 du/acre) The general existing use surrounding the property is single-family residential and vacant. A pUblic park has been acquired and is being developed for the parcel to the south. A day eare facility is located to the west. The Future Land Use Classification of the surrounding area is RH (Residential High). Fire Station Number #6 (350 East Midway Road) is located approximately 1 mile to the south/southeast. The subject property is in the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority service area. Weatherbee Road has a right-of-way width of 40 feet. A recommended condition of approval requires the dedication of 10 feet for additional right-of-way. - - --./ October 22, 2003 Page 2 Subject: Key West Bay Major Site Plan Scheduled Area Improvements: None. TYPE OF CONCURRENCY DOCUMENT REQUIRED: Certificate of Capacity ************************************************************************* STANDARDS FOR SITE PLAN REVIEW Section 11.02.07, of the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code identifies the minimum Standards of Review for all proposed Site Plans. These standards must be met in order for any site plan approvals to be considered. Staff has reviewed the request for Major Site Plan approval, utilizing these requirements and notes the following: A. CONSISTENCY WITH LOCAL ORDINANCES AND COMPREHENSIVE PLAN The proposed building or use is consisfent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of this Code, the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County; and the proposed use complies with all additional standards imposed on it by the particular provisions of this Code authorizing such use and any other requirement of the Code and Compiled Laws of St. Lucie County. The proposed Key West Bay site plan has been considered in light of the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of the 51. Lucie County Land Development Code, the 5t. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code and Compiled Laws of 5t. Lucie County. Policy 1.1.1.1 of the 5t. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan establishes maximum densities for the RH (Residential High) Future Land Use Category as 15 dwelling unit per acre. The Key West Bay project has a zoning district designation of RM-11 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 11 du/acre). The project proposes a density of 7.93 dwelling units per acre. Policy 1.1.9.4 of the 51. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan stipulates that the land development regulations shall provide that existing native upland habitat be incorporated into the site plan as a part of open space areas, required landscaping, or as a part of minimum yard areas so that as much of the identifiable habitat as practicable is maintained. The proposed project provides minimum incorporation of the existing native upland habitat into open space areas and landscaping. While the proposed plan meets the minimum intent of this policy, the plan basically provides a ·set aside" of the central portion of the site with little data to support that this area contained the most viable habitat. Policy 8.1.8.15 of the 51. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan stipulates that the land development regulations shall provide that existing on-site native upland habitat be incorporated into required site plans as a part of open spaces areas in lieu of the "" ..J October 22, 2003 Page 4 Subject: Key West Bay Major Site Plan submission to the County. The modification eliminated four buildings from the center of the property in order to preserve 1.44 acres of trees in that area. The proposed solution places the preserved trees toward the center of the site and does not provide for an enhanced perimeter buffer for the project. This perimeter buffer could have been of benefit to the community, residents, and particularly to the "Ar.1cientOaks Park" adjacent to the south. Prior to the issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy, staff is recommending that the developer of the project post a bond in the amount of $750,000.00 to cover the costs of tree mitigation and then coordinate with the St. Lucie County Environmental Resources Division for the mitigation of the loss of trees on-site. All trees between 2.5 inches and 12 inches located on-site shall be counted to satisfy the mitigation requirements. Upon completion of project construction, the site will be field surveyed to determine the limits of the 2.5 inch to 12 inch trees. A field meeting with St. Lucie County staff will be held to verify the quantity of trees preserved. Any remaining mitigation will be accounted for with on-site tree installation. When the maximum potential density of the site has been reached, the developer will satisfy any remaining mitigation by planting off site on public lands in St. Lucie County or by contributing $200.00 per inch of tree removed to the 51. Lucie County tree planting fund. Staff is recommending these actions as conditions of approval. 3. The proposed building or use will be constructed, a"anged, and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. As stated in #2 above, the project meets the County's minimum standards, but does little to buffer the adjacent park from the residential use. If the locations of the trees had been considered earlier in the process, greater opportunities for buffering and interface with surrounding properties would have been available. The design of the proposed project has been determined not to interfere with the development or use of neighboring properties. To the south of the proposed project is a planned public park. Other properties are either vacant or have single-family homes on them. C. ADEQUACY OF PUBLIC FACILITIES The proposed building or use complies with the standards of Chapter V. Adequate Public Facilities. The development is not expected to cause any of the transportation links in this area to fall below an acceptable minimum level of service. The applicant has provided a Transportation Impact Report for the project. The originally proposed 105 units were projected to create 678 daily trips to the roadway network. The revised 77-unit project can be expected to create an additional 497 daily trips to the roadway network. The applicant's transportation engineer has indicated that an acceptable level of service will be maintained and that no signalization on South U.S. Highway No. 1 or turn lanes are required for the project. The applicant has indicated, however, that the Florida Department of Transportation (FOOT) has plans for signalization at this intersection. "" ....-I October 22, 2003 Page 5 Subject: Key West Bay Major Site Plan Staff is recommending as a condition of approval that any road impact fee credits granted the project through the dedication of additional right-of-way shall be directed to this improvement. The proposed Key West Bay project is in the Ft. Pierce Utilities Authority (FPUA) service area and the·FPUA has indicated that they will provide service to the site. D. ADEQUACY OF FIRE PROTECTION The applicant has obtained from the St. Lucie County Fire District written confirmation that the proposed site plan conceptually meets the minimum access and water supply requirements for fire protection seIVices at this facility. The applicant has obtained confirmation from the St. Lucie County Fire District that the proposed plan conceptually meets the minimum access and water supply requirements for fire protection services at this facility. E. ADEQUACY OF SCHOOL FACILITIES The proposed building or use will be seIVed by adequate school facílíties. The proposed Key West Bay project is expected to have an impact on the County school system, but the project will be served with adequate school facilities. Student assignments will be made consistent with applicable St. Lucie County Board of Education standards and regulations. The Key West Bay project will be subject to the County's Educational Impact Fee Ordinance. F. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT For developments required to provide an environmental impact report under Section 11.02.09(A)(5), the proposed development will not contravene any applicable provision of the St. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, or of Chapter VIII, "Natural Environment Analysis~ of the Sf. Lucie County Barrier Island Study Analysis of Growth Management Policy Plan, Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. (August 1982). The site proposed for development consists of approximately 8.5 acres of Pine Flatwoods, 0.44 acre of Temperate Hardwoods (cabbage palm, laurel oak, water oak), . and 1 acre of Australian pines. Of the total of 10.01 acres of property, the applicant is . proposing to impact 8.5 acres with development. There will be a 1.44 acre preserve area consisting of pine flatwoods located near the center of the property. Other trees around the perimeter and between buildings are proposed to be preserved as well. The applicant's Environmental Impact Report indicates that there are 2 active gopher tortoise burrows on-site. The applicant proposes to relocate the gopher tortoises on-site. The 1.44-acre preserve area will accommodate up to four gopher tortoises. The applicant has indicated that if, during the construction phase of the project, the coordination of the prescribed burn and construction scheduling conflicts, the developer reserves the right to obtain an Incidental Take Permit from the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (FFWCC) to address impacts to the on-site tortoises. Staff """ ...., October 22,2003 Page 6 Subject: Key West Bay Major Site Plan finds this an unacceptable resolution to the potential schedule conflict and has included a condition to prohibit an incidental take. COMMENTS: The applicant, Gregg Wexler through agent Henry Kaye, has applied for major site. plan approval for the project to be known as Key West Bay, a proposed 77-unit, multiple-family project in 11 buildings. The project must be reviewed as a major site plan, because it is over 49 units. The project is located on the south side of Weatherbee Road, approximately 1,500 feet west of South U.S. Highway No.1 and 1,000 feet east of Oleander Avenue and is zoned RM-11 (Residential, Multiple-Family 11 du/acre). It is staff's understanding that the project is proposed to be rental apartments. If the use of the project changes to a condominium project, the developer will need to provide 51. Lucie County with a copy of the condominium documents. Staff has reviewed the request for major site plan approval and has determined that it is consistent with the 51. Lucie County Land Development Code, and meets the minimum intent of the Goals, Objectives, or Policies of the 51. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. Staff has reservations conceming the project's design concept as portrayed on the site plan, but finds that it meets the County's minimum technical standards. Attached is a copy of Draft Resolution 03-230, which, if approved, would grant this request for a Major Site Plan Approval, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed 77 -unit multiple- family project, the petitioner, their successors or assigns, shall convey to 51. Lucie County, in manner and form acceptable to the 51. Lucie County Attorney, the north 20 feet of the parcel, for the future widening of Weatherbee Road. To the extent permitted under the County's Code and Compiled Laws, any such dedication may be considered eligible for Road Impact Fee Credits. 2. Any road impact fee credits that may be collected from the developer shall be directed toward the costs of the signalization of South U.S. Hi¡¡hway NO.1 and Weatherbee Road. 3. Prior to ths issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the project, the developer, his successors or assigns, shall provide a bond in the amount of $750,000 to cover tree mitigation. Said bond shall be in a form acceptable to 51. Lucie County. . 4. The developer, his successors or assigns, shall coordinate with the 51. Lucie County Environmental Resources Division for the mitigation of the loss of trees on-site. All remaining native trees between 2.5 inches and 12 inches located on- site shall be counted to satisfy mitigation requirements. Upon completion of site construction, the site will be field surveyed to determine the limits of 2.5 inch to 12 inch trees. A field meeting with 51. Lucie County staff will be held to verify the quantity of trees preserved. Any remaining mitigation will be accounted for with on-site tree installation. When the maximum viable tree planting density of the site has been reached, the developer, his successors or assigns, shall satisfy any remaining mitigation by planting off site on public lands in 51. Lucie County or by contributing $200.00 per inch of trees removed from the site to the 51. Lucie ~ ...,¡ October 22, 2003 Page 7 Subject: Key West Bay Major Site Plan County tree planting fund. This mitigation requirement shall be satisfied no more than 60 days after the issuance of the last Certificate of Occupancy for the project. Satisfaction of this condition shall be measured by an on-site visit and result in the release of the bond referenced in #3 above. Partial satisfaction shall result in the release in the percentage satisfied. The balance shall be transferred to St. Lucie County for tree mitigation. 5. Prior to the issuance of a land clearing permit, the developer, his successors or assigns, shall submit to St. Lucie County a detailed planting plan and performance schedule for the removal of all exotics found within the preserve area. Exotic removal and replanting of the preserve area shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the first unit. 6. Prior to the issuance of a land clearing permit, the applicant, his successors or assigns, shall provide a conservation easement to St. Lucie County for the 1.44- acre preserve. Such easement shall be in perpetuity, in favor of St. Lucie County, include a Habitat Management Plan, and provide for the long term maintenance of the preserve area. 7. The developer, his successors or assigns, shall be responsible for maintaining and managing the Preserve Area in its existing natural condition with the periodic removal of invasive exotic vegetation. This effort shall be coordinated with and inspected by the County's Environmental Resource Division. 8. St. Lucie County has the right to enforce the provisions of the Habitat Management Plan. Restoration of habitat and other remedies may be required of any person or corporation found in violation of any of the provisions of the Habitat Management Plan or the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 9. Prior to the removal of any vegetation for the construction area of the site, the applicant's representative shall identify any gopher tortoises located in the proposed construction area. The applicant's representative shall provide the Environmental Resource Division with a map clearly indicåting any active or inactive gopher tortoise burrows found on the site. Any gopher tortoises found shall be relocated by the applicant's representative, in accordance with all state regulations to the preserve area located on site. Under no circumstances shall the gopher tortoises be subject to an incidental take permit. 10. The developer, his successors or assigns, shall coordinate with the St. Lucie County Engineering Division to improve the drainage ditch which extends southward from Weatherbee Road. Said drainage ditch is located in the general vicinity of St. Lucie County's cross drain beneath Weatherbee Road east of the subject property. Improvements shall include, but not be limited to: vegetation removal, grading, and sod. Positive drainage shall be achieved to the satisfaction of the County Engineer. "" -' October 22, 2003 Page 8 SUbject: Key West Bay Major Site Plan Staff recommends approval of Draft Resolution 03-230. Please let me know if you have any questions. SUBMITTED: Dennis J. Murphy, AICP Community Development Director hi cc: County Administrator County Attorney Gregg Wexler, Esquire Henry Kaye, Esquire File "-' .., October 22, 2003 Page 8 Subject: Key West Bay Major Site Plan SUBMITTED: l t enni J. M , AICP Community Development Director hi ce: County Administrator County Attorney Gregg Wexler, Esquire Henry Kaye, Esquire File 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ........ ...., RESOLUTION 03-230 FILE NO.: MJSP-03.Q07 A RESOLUTION GRANTING MAJOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT TO BE KNOWN AS KNOWN AS KEY WEST BAY WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of SI. Lucie County, Florida, based on the testimony and evidence, including but not limited to the staff report, has made the following determinations: 1. Greoo Wexler throuoh Aoent Henrv Kave. Esouire. has applied for major site plan approval for the project to be known as Key West Bay consisting of 77 multiple- family units in 11 buildings for property located on the south side of Weatherbee Road, approximately 1,500 feet west of South U.S. Highway No.1 and 1,000 feet east of Oleander Avenue in the RM-11 (Residential, Multiple-Family - 11 du/acre) Zoning District for the property described in Part B. 2. The Development Review Committee has reviewed the site plan for the proposed project and found it to meet minimum technical requirements of the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code and to be consistent with the future land use maps from the SI. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan. . 3. The proposed project is minimally consistent with the general purpose, goals, objectives, and standards of the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code, the SI. Lucie County Comprehensive Plan, and the Code of Ordinances of SI. Lucie County. 4. The proposed project will not have an undue adverse effect on adjacent property, the character of the neighborhood, traffic conditions, parking, utility facilities, or other matters affecting the public health, safety, afld general welfare. 5. Certain steps have been taken to minimize any adverse effect of the proposed project on the immediate vicinity through building design, site design, landscaping and screening. These steps, though not exhaustive, have been detennined to meet minimum technical standards. 6. The proposed project will be constructed, arranged and operated so as not to interfere with the development and use of neighboring property, in accordance with applicable district regulations. 7. The proposed project will be served by adequate public facilities and services. FileNo.:MJSP·03·007 October 28, 2003 Resolution 03·230 Page 1 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 ......... -' 8. The applicant has applied for and received a revised certificate of capacity, a copy of which is attached to this order as Exhibit A, as required under Chapter V, SI. Lucie County Land Development Code. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of SI. Lucie County, Florida: A. Pursuant to Section 11.02.05 of the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code, the site plan for the project known as Key West Bay, is hereby approved as shown on the site plan drawings for the project prepared by Mosby & Associates, Inc., dated September 15, 2003, and date stamped received by the SI. Lucie County Community Development Director on September 15, 2003, for the property described below, subject to the following conditions: 1. Prior to issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the proposed 77-unit multiple-family project, the petitioner, their successors or assigns, shall convey to SI. Lucie County, in manner and form acceptable to the St. Lucie County Attorney, the north 20 feet of the parcel, for the future widening of Weatherbee Road. To the extent permitted under the County's Code and Compiled Laws, any such dedication may be considered eligible for Road Impact Fee Credits. 2. Any road impact fee credits that may be collected from the developer shall be directed toward the costs of the signalization of South U.S. Highway No.1 and Weatherbee Road. 3. Prior to ths Issuance of the first Certificate of Occupancy for the project, the developer, his successors or assigns, shall provide a bond in the amount of $750,000 to cover tree mitigation. Said bond shall be In a form acceptable to St. Lucie County. 4. The developer, his successors or assigns, shall coordinate with the SI. Lucie County Environmental Resources Division for the mitigation of the loss of trees on-site. All remaining native trees between 2.5 Inches and 12 inches located on-site shall be counted to satisfy mitigation requirements. Upon completion of site construction, the site will be field surveyed to determine the limits of 2.5 inch to 12 Inch trees. A field meeting with SI. Lucie County staff will be held to verify the quantity of trees preserved. Any remaining mitigation will be accounted for with on-site tree installation. When the maximum viable tree planting density of the site has been reached, the developer, his successors or assigns, shall satisfy any remaining mitigation by planting off site on public lands in St. Lucie County or by contributing $200.00 per Inch of trees removed from the site to the SI. Lucie County tree planting fund. This mitigation requirement shall be satisfied no more than 60 FileNo. :MJSP-03·007 October 28, 2003 Resolution 03-230 Page 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21' 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 10. .... ....., days after the issuance of the last Certificate of Occupancy for the project. Satisfaction ofthis condition shall be measured by an on-site visit and result in the release of the bond referenced in #3 above. Partial satisfaction shall result in the release in the percentage satisfied. The balance shall be transferred to St. Lucie County for tree mitigation. 5. Priorto the issuance of a land clearing permit, the developer, his successors or assigns, shall submit to St. Lucie County a detailed planting plan and performance schedule for the removal of all exotics found within the preserve area. Exotic removal and replanting ofthe preserve area shall be completed prior to the issuance of a Certificate of Occupancy for the first unit. 6. Prior to the issuance of a land clearing permit, the applicant, his successors or assigns, shall provide a conservation easement to St. Lucie County for the 1.44-acre preserve. Such easement shall be in perpetuity, in favor of St. Lucie County, include a Habitat Management Plan, and provide for the long term maintenance of the preserve area. 7. The developer, his successors or assigns, shall be responsible for maintaining and managing the Preserve Area in its existing natural condition with the periodic removal of invasive exotic vegetation. This effort shall be coordinated with and inspected by the County's Environmental Resource Division. 8. St. Lucie County has the right to enforce the provisions of the Habitat Management Plan. Restoration of habitat and other remedies may be required of any person or corporation found in violation of any of the provisions of the Habitat Management Plan or the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. 9. Prior to the removal of any vegetation for the construction area of the site, the applicant's representative shall identify any gopher tortoises located in the proposed construction area. The applicant's representative shall provide the Environmental Resource Division with a map clearly indicating any active or inactive gopher tortoise burrows found on the site. Any gopher tortoises found shall be relocated by the applicant's representative, in accordance with all state regulations to the preserve area located on site. Under no circumstances shall the gopher tortoises be subject to an Incidental take permit. The developer, his successors or assigns, shall coordinate with the St. Lucie County Engineering Division to improve the drainage ditch which extends southward from Weatherbee Road. Said drainage ditch is located in the general vicinity of St. Lucie County's cross drain beneath Weatherbee Road FileNo.:MJSP·03-007 October 28, 2003 Resolution 03·230 Page 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 ....., ..."I east of the subject property. Improvements shall include, but not be limited to: vegetation removal, grading, and sod. Positive drainage shall be achieved to the satisfaction of the County Engineer. B. The property on which this Major Site Plan is being granted is described as follows: SECTION 3, RANGE 36 SOUTH, RANGE 40 EAST. WHITE CITY SID, LOT 7. (TAX 10 #: 3403-502-0016-000/2) (Location: South side of Weatherbee Road, approximately 1,500 feet west of South U.S. Highway No.1 and 1,00 feet east of Oleander Avenue) C. The approvals and authorizations granted by this Resolution for the purpose of obtaining building permits on this property and the approvals granted under the resolution shall remain effective for the remaining validity period of the Key West Bay major site plan. D. The Final Site Plan approval granted under this resolution is specifically conditioned to the requirement that the petitioner, Gregg Wexler, including any successors in interest, shall obtain all necessary development permits and construction authorizations from the appropriate State and Federal regulatory authorities, including but not limited to; the United States Army Corps of Engineers, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection, and the South Florida Water Management District, prior to the issuance of any local building penn its of authorizations to commence development activities on the property described in Part B. E. A copy of this resolution shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Part A, which plan shall be placed on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. F. The revised certificate of capacity, attached as Exhibit A, shall be vaiid for the same period as this order. If this order expires or otherwise terminates, the certificate of capacity shall automatically tenninate. G. A copy of this Order shall be mailed, retum receipt requested to the developer and agent of record as identified on the site plan applications. H. A copy of this Order shall be attached to the site plan drawings described in Section A, which plan shall be on file with the St. Lucie County Community Development Director. I. This Order shall be recorded in the Pubiic Records of St. Lucie County. FileNo.:MJSP-03-007 October 28, 2003 Resolution 03-230 Page 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 "" After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Cliff Bames xxx XXX Vice-Chairman Paula A. Lewis Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXX XXX Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner John D. Bruhn XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED This 28th Day of October 2003. ..."I BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY Chairman ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: Deputy Clerk County Attorney hI H:IWORDlRESOLUTIONIFINISHED.03IKeyWeslBaY,SPIKeyWestBay.doc FileNo.:MJSP-03·007 October 28, 2003 Resolution 03-230 Page 5 ...-- -..iI ~ ~""T"~OOf@ll~ COUNTY . FlORIDA--'" - COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT ADMINISTRATION MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners ;/ ¡} Randy Stevenson, Assistant Community Development Director ~ October 27,2003 FROM: DATE: SUBJECT: October 28, 2003 - BOCC Agenda Key West Bay - Supplementallnfonnaüon After additional review of the environmental aspects of this project, County staff proposes that the following additional conditions be made a part of the staff report and any subsequent approval: 1. Any trees designated to be preserved that area damaged during construction activities shall be subject to a mitigation ratio of 4:1. 2. Controlled burning on the subject site, including the preserve area, shall be prohibited. All vegetation removed from the preserve area shall be removed manually using such methods as hand pulling, hand spading, cutting with hand or chain saws. Thinning will only be allowed to remove understory fuel and to open ground cover. Thinning will only be allowed using manual labor methods. No mechanical equipment will be allowed in the preserve area. All dead or diseased plant material removed from the preserve area will be disposed of off site using appropriate methods. No debris, including dead plants, plant clippings, or wood scraps will be allowed in the preserve area. These proposed additional conditions have been reviewed and approved by the Environmental Resources Division. Should you have any questions on the additional conditions, please call rne at 462-1590. Cc: Doug Ande[Son, County Administrator Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator Dennis Murphy, Community Development Director Vanessa Bessey, Environmental Resources Manager Hank Flores, Planner III ...:,..",".,..:.... . ~ I'· . ; .'. . ·~'n·'''.~~-·''· .~."~..,,. '-...........'''''.....'"r\oò-'''':~.... -'-'.i."";.'"'''''.''' '_. . "."'.:'.....,..'.'.?". . -' .~~I'i", ~ - 'ì . /0/--2 lIt> 3 To: St. Lucie County Commissioners 462-2131 2300 Virginia Avenue PI. Pierce, Fla. From: Patricia A. Ferrick Governmental Representative North Fork Property Owners 772-461-36I2 4802 South 25th Street Subject: Property located on the South side of Wetherbee Road, East of Oleander Avenue to be called "Key West Bay", We wish to "Thank" Commissioner Hutchinson, for recommending to the developer that he get in touch with the residents of the White City area. 10hn Fenick, represented the North Fork Property Owners at the meeting as I am still having problems ftom the bums that have taken place in my neighborhood which is inside the urban service area as is this property. He attended the meeting, along wìth Arlene Goodman, Herb Beach, and others. Everyone present agreed that no burning should take place. They could not believe their ears, at what they were hearing in this area which is a burn sensitive area. The developer; was told by Amy Matt St. Lucie County Staff that be should control burn, the preservation area. This area is a burn sensitive area I live approximately ~ mile west of this prpperty, Arlene Goodman lives east of the property, works north of the property and Herb Beach lives to the South. Arlene is smoke sensitive, Herb, has COPD problems and asbestos breathing problems his wife loAnn has Acute Asthmatic Bronchitis. Clara & Frank Jackson, also Sara Demming on Rainbow Drive, and the distinct possibility that smoke also affected Alma Randle too, There is also a congregate care facility located at 490 1 Oleander Avenue TO 3':"='-:1 S3~8';;' 1~ÐIl3ÎmK1 G19£1~~2~~ 0e=ST èP00/~Z¡GT v '"-,, Agenda Request ""'" Item Number: 1013 Meet/nil Date: Oct. 28, 2003 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ J [ ] [X] [ ] Quasi-JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development SUBJECT: Consider Final Record Plat approval for 'Parcei 34, A·E @ The Rese e (The Lakes)" Plat Director BACKGROUND: On April 1, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners approved Resoiution 03-014, which granted a Final Planned Unit Development approval for the portion of the Reserve PUD/DRI known as Parcel 34 A-E @ The Reserve (The Lakes). Parcel 34, A·E is located off Commerce Centre Drive at the Southeast comer of the intersection of Dogieg Drive and Champions Way, directly across from PGA Leaming Center. This phase of development includes 213 residential lots. The applicant has submitted an Irrevocable Letter of Credit for the subdivision improvements. FUNDS AVAilABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Final Plat for 'Parcel 34 @ The Reserve (The Lakes)" and authorize staff to complete the final processing of this Piat. COMMISSION ACTION: [J[J APPROVED D OTHER CONCURRENCE: D DENIED Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent Approval does not include approval of connec!ion-ScheduleworkshopJan Coordination! Signatures County Attorney Finance.: Environ. Resources; Mgt. & Budget: Fire Dept: Utility: Purchasing: Public Works: Engineering: (agend742a) '-' -' COMMISSION REVIEW: October 28, 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (Planning Division) MEMORANDUM TO: County Commissiòn FROM: Community Development Director DATE: October 22,2003 SUBJECT: Consider Final Record Plat approval for the "Parcel 34 A-E @ The Reserve (The Lakes) On April 1, 2003, the Board of County Commissioners approved Resolution 03-014, which granted a Final Planned Unit Development approval for the portion of the Reserve PUDIDRI known as Parcel 34, A-E @ The Reserve (The Lakes). The Lakes parcel is located off Commerce Centre Drive at the southeast corner of the intersection of Dogleg Drive and Champions Way, directly south of the PGA Learning Center. This phase of development includes 213 residential lots, The developers have submitted an Irrevocable Letter of Credit for the required subdivision improvements (infrastructure). Staff recommends that the Board approve the Final Plat for "Parcel 34, A-E @ the Reserve (The Lakes)" and authorize staff to complete the final processing of this Plat. If you have any questions, please let us know. SOO ITIED: tor cs H:/wp/projectslprojects/Reserve/Parcel 34/Plat/bccmemo. cc: County' Administrator County Attomey ø ® 8 ~ il li~f I h III !I 'k ÎI!I !¡! ~ ! I ik I¡E I Ii I r¡ I 'I' ~¡ , 11f': I II I Ipl í ~i!Ü -_.__ ,,~- ii!' It ~ .. ii!' ii!' "- i! II'!~ ~ II II "- IS I, ·=1::; II ~ :> ::; 0 ~ ~ ~... i'il;¡ ~ 0 fii ~ I o 'f ~ r ' '" I~ e , , 0- J i' o § XII" ~ I, I!' . '" ~; . I!' I Œg a~ ~ ~i¡ I ~~' ~ffi'. ~~ .11 ~5 Ii o.zl ~ i 0'" !5~il o hi o~ ¡I I!!êl I!!!i! I¡ 5¡¡¡U~ I!!~ ,~. ~I! II <\< <\w , ~o 'I ~ ¡¡:¡::. ,,¡: II ,,¡: I'j 0." zt¡1!I11!I ~~~ -z ! ~ffi ii, ¡=z 1<" ~8, "''' ø ~o :1, ~d r 811 :! w , () , ~ Wi:i (9~ «~ Ilf Ii, 'Irl i"; II 'f¡ CD -.J~ k~RI -.J :¡:" '" I~II; =I!¡ I!II! li~ ~ r _0-0 .v;1 >::>æ I ~Ii~ lii~1 !I 00 II¡II lv' I I! I en... "Iii I .f~f 1= « <D"- .~.I, ,III v ,n I i!1111 "- ",. ~ (9 ~~ II'!! I:. I I 1'1 II !I .i liS' . ~r¡ :111" I III ::s 0... en::> ~llib Ii: I II- ~ I~II "- ~8 . ( f . IIWI Ii ~ I r'l~: "'J--OW !z 'II ~' I I ~ If!: II CD 0-13 ~ ¡;iii; III~ z i~' II « ;t3 I i5P s 1~II,r ~ ~ dill C/) z,...: " II: ~ ,'JI r¡ .¡ill.~, oen ru II! I' ~1"1 I~ I~! ~ fmll W§ ~r"II; I ~ ¡1~llbl ~en êJi I'J'~ I I ~~Ii () 'l'llr ~ ;~Ilil¡i «~ ~ "h' !:II ~ ( ~ , i nicl § en _tl:. ; -.J;?; >- ... II!'! .,~ I; ¡I 'I¡ ~I:. I'. Ij~1 ii:. 'i:. ¡ill; I Iln!! I'!I ill~. m!1 ¡!I!I ~II ~:I~ ~II;~ ~~II :~II 'i ~j!!i i ~ r,gl~i ¡IIi i;!I~ ¡¡!il i~il ;:,'!! fl,!! ~ I,:!! !~! _I! I I,flll f :q ~I hi' dlli .1~li 11'111 !I' II I II' ql' ,Gr' ~ ~ . Ii! i d ~ Alh.,. 'i ~J ,nl ~I,I r,I,. !I' 0.1 '11'1. d, I "'Iii e <Ir' ij III1 lil!i I!in 11'11' I II· ~ I , ~ ¡§II~i :IM !~Ii. I:rx( rØ'1 fi!¡ mil ~bi !:I¡ !:!¡ I i Ilä ; i ¡r¡ '1'1111,1 I~I' , ',IIIII·CII·¡ ,¡ ! II ~ ~~ h , I~'Þ~~I.~~~¡~~~ ~ ~ !t.~¡¡ :1 ~ ¡mil; ~!h! ~r.id ~llh ~III! ~IIII ~t.li ~I~. ~IM ~Iel !I ~ il ¡:~!,II ~ I. " ~~. :II;~¡ 11'~i~ ~11;1i1 ~i~ ;¡Ii!i t§· ~ s~dh iUd~ -:JUI H.:IS1 ') ..fJS JS 'Wd 6S:çs;: .() £OOlIOtI60 'ðMp18 dije ~8AJnS\O~~O-Z;0\:d -' R B r I, ¡I¡I Ilf Iw: HI¡II! g .(1 !'ii Ii '-- '-' ~ WU'i <.9¡1¡ «~ ..J~ ..J :¡;< _!:;o >0;;:: ",9 « ",u. u. "'- ~<.9~~ :50..."'::> a. zO < ;:U I- ow 1-0 « -::> ;;\.... CJ) z,..: 0'" W~ ~'" «~ ..Jz ~ II ~ !IIII 'ìlll~ I! I·,ïj@'jlll' ¡ ~I'~I '1"11 1!!~Ji~!~!li;J!~ì!~:i;I;::!lil!I!~¡;¡i!!~~II;!;1i!"I~;I!: I a!,."@¡ !!!II!I.¡. "I,i~ 1I'!IIZlil.III,I¡ !I~' '!!i~í;l;d~I'!II"il'¡I~ill~~I:"JI'llii 11";d~!III·1 . @~,f;I'_I!~¡~'¡ II~ "II~'II~~':~¡III~!I! i'I!~';~1 !.~!I~I':I;~@.~; ~!I~I~II'ili!~I'I; ,1;11!!lill:~@I! 1(;':I:I~~I~;I::~;!i!I!¡ 'f iÎ~;~;III'!I¡;;lf'Î~;f!1 I ~~¡¡~!¡!~~~¡~~ ilili¡i¡I;!!;~!¡i!!i~li i ~1'~'lil If',I"111 .III'·'I;!I !~llä('~'I¡ -If'.I,' I ;!!I;,II!~ili!~¡lli!f:II;;i¡i;ljl¡!Ii;!i¡lili~¡Ii!~! I I 'i;~ I ~'li!!'!!ii!li!I~!'i,i:~I'I'=:ii~: !¡Ii I !lliil~!:! if ; iil¡!lhl!-~!~M~¡I~I!'I!~~~:~!ldl~~ld: ~¡i!1 i ~~III,lf'ii!l;i · .'1 ¡ "I"~~~Ii;1 õ'¡ i'fi~~q' i¡¡I' a! I ':1 I@·' I . :1 !1=:I'!I!f!¡I~:illli:!~II!!llili¡~¡~~i(;!ii r!!il ; 1!;llilf;~!li · ;~:,I=I!:'!i"II;~'=~i;~i il'I,lli~i Ililll =!!;';:jl=I!~i='!'!;(; ! !; ;!Ii!;;!!il¡!!I!liil;,!li!i!I!li¡i!i!i;'!!i!I;i!ill~!I;1;;:!=!!i~1 § ~i II!iiïlilll i.! ~¡;lllil~!i! i~ ~r ~ I: i: i; fif!i 61 i!1i Illil ;nl¡~ I i~111 " _..._œ ""'I fé!81 ')¡-u,,"s '1'Id at:gç: ~o £0000£180 '1!Mp1. duB d\o<....'"S\o~ ~o-ZO\:d \..- ~~ I , ii i I r gl ~ I I :I! I ; ¡¡¡Ii it! '!'I I I . i: ¡¡fii ~! ~¡ !P " """~ SLwt..1UILODS °z . ~ i ,', " , ~i '" ~! " , . ~! .' w . > I . w · 0 · . ¡ . I- w S UJ % WU'i e " I~ øi1J e, ; t ::2, ., ~ ~ .~. «['5 w' I .¡ ni ....J~ e. %, ....J :r < ::a . ~ III h -5" w2 >oi2 UJg u imlii!l~ « <oIL " IL ",. w ::ø~~ · · :5a.UJ::> 0 Q. ~8 u mUlm. · < --ow 0 ~~~~=gia~~:a 1-5 L « -::> / ;:ï.... C/) zt-' OUJ w!rl ~UJ «~ ....J1!:: ~ .g I. !ii !~! l'i w -" ". > !'! "" .' w" " u!l 0- · w', " It::å .+ w%:!' %-~ e" , e-. ·wl o. ".1 ;~\ L t1 /......../-- ~'\.ti " ~.../ , ~: ~I ¡!!II ~!II 11f: ~'lll1 ii "OU H::ISl ,>!-ueµg 'V'k £~:L9:~O £OOl:IOCI60 '6Mp1eldn8jd\'<8¡\JnS\o~~o-~l1t:¿ "'" -----¡j~¡ I- m WL5 C):¡¡ «~ .....J~ .....J :!Õ<C - !:;'" >oir mg « <0 u. U. ",. O,na.ç I- \....I -z :5 a.. ¡¡¡:J a. ~8 <Cf-Ow I-¡:; «~3 z,..: (f) Q m W&¡ ~(I) «~ .....J~ ~ tk.oc It,(t 51;; ~:;¡ _~_ !h, 1:_ (. ,~ J! 1.1.(.9 .h· . .- ...,¡ w i,.õIIL ~.,. ~_. ~ II ¡IllS Iff ~I! I. ¡ !ilnf ! . i! ~ Id !! ~¡ !n ~. ! II iHl š¡¡[ 1f1': il¡1! g [I fli Ii ~.:...c-:r.~, ~ kr IJ I~- =~! ¡I- Hi filii, imlilf~ Immmlï ~~;~~gij~~ 'Ou H.::tS1 ')f-4J8!Jg 'nd ;t:9S:~O &OOZIO£I60 '6Mp18id\leJd\-<8^-Jns\QI.UrZO\:¿ --- '-' -- ~...._- ~ ~I iH11 !I! fir:: I ~¡I I .[1 -- - I lï i ----,[ I I Ii ·1 I I I < I :¡ ~ I I ~ I I I- I::: I:;:: II¡; Iw J: ..~ I" ì~! IIf! I~ Þ i , ¡'ili ¡h I f ,~!I ~! '¡!¡it¡i ~! ~i ~n 3)' _. ~i ~j . , I I r--___ 1 I I I --- -'- -, ~i ". ~i '" .... '" Wû'i ø~ <C~ --!~ --! '" '" -!:)Q > 025 en.... _co"- "-...... .,~ °rna.z ~'-'¡jj=> a.a..~8 "' -ow ....0 <Ci3 CI) zo-: 0'" wE ~'" <C~ --!~ ~ · · · · < " · · · .... ...., !~ . f'. ¡~, m IIr I it imlMI~ IIImmll IIIIIIII':¡¡'HII . ..~~gi:l c-æ . ....1 H"I81 ')1-0""8 'Wd ot:oo:zo £OOZiOtI6O '6Mpl.""ll dIM"'nS\o~ ~(}-~O\'d \..- J ~. , ~i.î¡ I- '" Wi5 ø:¡¡ «~ -J¡i -J",,,,, -1-0 >::>æ 00 "'..... « <D IL IL ",. ~ø~~ :S n ",::> Q....... ~8 "" - ow I-ü « -::> ~-' Cf) z,..: 0'" Wß :::::c::::'" «~ -J~ ..... " 1 f _I ì-- I ----- f " I I !~ " I'. ¡¡~, m flU if IHiMI i ß imUni!&I unrrnrll ."."" ".P"" ooÐII·~:Œi3r:·-õe < :¡ i , f in f ! U I f i :H Ii I ~if"lI . i! i~ fig !! !i !n \;-------------------- x~ ~~_$::..~ -----------"'T----, -"--__ oa".~~ :: -----.. ~\ :: ~. -------------\ ¡ i ~, ---------_ I : -, , ~~ J : ~~ I ~"....... ¡: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , --- -', -- -, " <, " -.. i~~~' ~: .- ~ ' . , -ï , .¡ci ¡ I , , I , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ~ ~Ij i!¡ll GIll 1/11: mlt ,.' Ii 'OUI H:lSl ') -UI!¡.IS 'rk o~~o:zo &OOZIOEI60 ·6MplBId\Jerd\.<eAlnS\O~~o-ZO\:d J ~. . ~i. n .... m 1.Uù'i (9:1J «~ ....J~ ....J :r:< -59 >03 m...J « ca"- "- ",. ~ (9 ~~ :5 a.. m:O Q. zO ;:u <I-0w ....õ « -:0 ;iÇ...J (f) z,..: om I.U§ :::x::m «~ ....J~ ~ '- ~i <n. ~f '" , \"" Þ w " > ' c. w. o- w'. ø::j ~1i" ....z=f ¡; t :;, " .!. ,. ~-. 'wl 0- ~ ".~ ~g ~: &; \/! I ~ / I I / / / / / · w · · · " · · , ......., -.-... \.0.0- , t ! ~ , . --- " · w · · · " · · > ,~. ,,_.J! - , , ¡gifl U ì f I :I! j I , lill if! . 'f'~ J! r i. if Ii ~! !i !n !~ =~I ¡~, m III i il ,mll¡lliJ 111m;;. ';":'~~~*i~~~A ":)UI H:fS1 ')C--Uef.lS 'VkJ øç:~O:lO tooZlOCl6o '6Mpletd\Ie c:MeAJns\O~"O-lO\:d fgj; L'j IHi: ¡¡I I 111': ¡.¡il gl,:¡ i" II > 0: < Õ ¡¡; IU Z IU ID IU :x: t- o: fZ IU U ;:; C < :'183S? lHEToRONTO-DOMINION BANK ...",¡ '""' (~POt~!08 I RriFVOC(¡BI.F ~";TAHnnY ! F'J TEl'l or' CREDIT NO. 8191656 PL(¡CF AND "',;TL OF ISSUE: MONTREAl_ 15 SEP1'E~f8ER 2003 DATE AND PLAce OF EXPIRY: 1~ SEPTEMBER, 2004 AT OUR COUNTERS ***********APPLICANT***********************RENEFICIARY*.****.*** CM!AOA SQU"d?F MANAGEMENT L TO. , 10EPr;\RTMENT OF PUBLIC tJOR/Œ, 2200 YONGF ST., SUITE 1600, 12300 VIRGINIA AVE, TORONTO, ONTARIO, CANADA M4S 2C1.IFOfn PIEr,CE, Fl.., USA :3498-2 I. *********ADVISING B~NK*****.*.********¡************.******.****** THE TORONTo DOMINION BANK GLOBAL TRADE FINANCE, 500 ST,JACQUES ST" 10TH FLOOR, MONTREAL, QUEBEC, CANAnA H2Y ISl A*************.***.***..***************.************************* AMOUNT: U,S, DOLLARS 2,953,710.00 TWO MILLION NINE HUNDRED FIFTY THREE THOUSAND SEVEN HUNDRED TEN 00/100 A******.*...*'A******.....A..*.**..*.***.*...*.***********.******. RE:IRREUOCABLE LETTER OF CREDIT NO, G191656 AMOUNT:USD2,953,710,OO NONTRANSFERABLE-NONASSIGNABLE GENTLEMEN: WE HEREBY AUTHORIZE YOU TO DRAW ON, THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK, GLOBAL TRADE FINANCE, 500 ST. JACQUES STREET, 10TH FLOOR, MONTREAL, QUFBEC, C,;N,'\I'I(\ H2Y 1.81. '. FOR CANADA SQUARE MANAGEMENT LTD" 2200 YONGE STREET, SUITE 1600, TORONTO, ONTARIO~ CANADA M48 2C6, UP TO AN AGGREGATE AMOUNT OF US02,953,710.00 (TWO MIU_ION NINE HUNDRED FIFTY THREE THOUSAND ~:)FV¡:::(J !-·¡;Ji"~'~!:::-F¡·J TEN 00/:/.00 t..!t\;TTF:D STATES nÜI..Li~RSj, AVAILABLE QY YOUR DRAFT(SI AT SIGHT WHEN ACCOMPANIED BY A SIGNED STATEMENl BY AN AUTHORI7ED RFPRESENTATTVE OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC UOE~S STATTNG THAT CANADA SQUARE MANAGFMFNf LTD" HAS FAILED TO COMPLETE IMPROVEMENTS AS SET FORTH BY THE DEPARTMENT OF f'unuc r;:ECORl1S, INr.LUDEO IN THE SUBDIVISION AGIIEEME-NT FOR THE - PLAT OF THE: LAI<ES AT PGA VILLAGE,AND THAT FUNDS DRAWN HEREUNDER ARE NECESSARY TO COMPLETE SUCH IMPROVEMENTS, DRAFTS Musr BE PRI SENTEO FOR PAYMENT NOT LATf,R THAN SEPTEMBER 1.1., 2004. C'.l ~ á.¿¿~~--.-, c·06 ~ ¡-.\i!THOP:i:7Fn STC-;t.j(:',:IJPF I." :. j {"': ;) -j ".>-" !:"" n ~::; T H h! (::; T r ! ¡::' r" . , Inl: IUHUNTO-UOMINION BANK .' "'" ...." PAGE 2 CONTiNIJ('TION 01° II~/(EVOCABL.F. fJIANDBY LETTER OF CI,EDIT NO,G191.656 DATL OF ISSUL:15 SEPTEMBER. 2003ATE OF EXPIRY:11 SEPTEMBER. 2004 AFPI IC(.\NT: CANADA SQUARE MANAGEMENT L TD. . BENEFICIARYfDEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS. EACH DRAFT MUST STATE T~AT IT IS 'DRAWN UNDER LETTER OF CREDIT NO. G191656 OF THE TORONTO DOMINION BANK. GLOBAL TRADE FINANCE. ~,;O() flT, ,Jf\CQUES ST.,,, 10TH FLOOR. MONTREAL. QUEBEC. CANADA H2Y 1.S1 THE ORIGINAL OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT MUST BE PRESENTED WITH ANY DRAWING AND THE AMOUNT OF EACH DRAFT MUST BE ENDORSED ON THE REVERSE SrDL OF THIS LETTER OF CREDIT, WE HEREBY AGREE WIl~ YOU AND NEGOTIATING BANKS OR BANKERS THAT ALL DRAFTS DRAWN UNDER AND IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TERMS OF THIS CREDIT WILL BE DULY HONORED UPON PRESENTATION AND DELIVERY OF DOCUMENTS AS SPECIFIED TO THE TORONTO DOMINION RANK. AT ADDRESS INDICATED ABOVE, >- 5 THIS LETTER OF CREDIT IS SUBJECT TO AND SHALL BE GOVERNED BY THE Õ P/~OVISIONS OF H'IE UNIFORM r:OMMEI'CIAL CODE AS ADOPTED DY THE ffi STATE OF FLORIDA. z III m III ~ a: o IL UI o s: Q <I: c\~~ / / - ~ &¿¿~~ W,Ç . c.> 01 01 -00 ro en r' 3~g . ::T :J - '-·0- -O~ :C ...., 0 'tJ . "02 ï;O ú) éD . -Þ--oCD CDroOl CD~CD 0,.- ::E ro '< (f) rr1 V "" 0'> "" = = Co.> c.. ~\b ~ !11 í"> ? C· ~o c. (.)::1 :r-' ~~t. !D, :0 m o '" W"Tl Õ ::>'c- ena.o CD"',,- _:Il::J CD"'m 3 '9. . C"5!Lo ~ ;; g N ~ $Þ 0,,- ::J c: ~ 2.5D ap~ "'~[n CD ~ CD ~ .., m ::J u:> 5' '" '" ~ o - :::;:- '" I\> I\>~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ CD '" '" 0> 01 ...'" I\> ~ :Þ 3 ~ OCD '" "'0> 01'" "'I\> ~o Z ? (J) -": ifí í ~ :II ~ ~ o¡ ~ " " " @ !;!! r- :E !It () () :;:: :II c: E I\> 5' 5' 5' '" ID 0 0 0 CT () ~'" () . iõ ",. ~ r§' ::> ! !!!. '" '" '" g :Þ 5- 0 '" '" ~ ~ g en CD CD ¡;; ::J U> ::> CD - "1j ~ lit 0 G> G> 3 m m -i - ¡;r 0 ~ 0 x ::> ~ :E - 0 G> g ¡¡¡ ji ~ 0 ¡¡ a. § m c: e¡. !!!. ¡¡¡ ()ñ () c: S- CD CD s· a. CD '" x !l :Þ iõ ~ c: ~ '" Ñ' U> '" ~ II> :II !!" õ' õ' c: iõ en en U> CD '" c- ~ CD g ::> -< c-a- a- ¿, ¿, !D CD r- ID 0 ~. ::> en ~ ¡¡¡ a. :II õ' C '" ~ 0 õ' ,,- en ã I><> CD . , U> en !D ::> II> CD CD 0 r- r- CD c: U> ~ '" ::> tß º lit U> G> =t. ~ :;; ;:: ;:: ~ :;; ~ S' ",. 0 c: 0 ã¡ ~. ~ '" ::: ::> I\> ~ ~ en ::r ><' CD ¡¡¡ ~ CD ~ a. :;; U> Õ CD !!!. CD " ~ I\> I\> I\> '" I\> '" 01 I\> j 0 ~ ... '" '" 01 $" 0 ~ .. 0> 0> 01 01 01 '" 0 0 0 t 01 '" c: 0> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ k .. ~ ën .. ~ Ò> ~ .. ~ ~ ~ II> ~ ... ~ '" I\> ¡j ¡j 01 R5 ::J '" '" ~ 0 '" 0 - CD 01 01 0 '" '" ... ~ en r r- r- r- en en en en en r- en en r- () () r- () r- r- r- c: :< " :n :n :n :< :< :< :< :< ¡n :< :< :n :< :< :n :< ¡n ¡n ¡n " ;::;: ~ '" '" '" c: '" '" I\> ... '" " '" '" '" '" ~ ~ '" '" ~ '" '" '" '" ~ '" '" CD ... ;::;: I\> '" '" '" 0> ~ 01 Ì\> 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ 01 01 '" I\> ¿" '" '" 10 Ï\) :.. 10 g¡ b '" ê.> ¡" !'- '" ~ ¡" '" 0 '" '" () :". 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ '" ~ '" I\> 01 I\> '" 0> 0> CD 0> '" I\> Co> b U> b 0 b b - 0 0 0 '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ~ '" '" '" '" '" it ~ '" '" '" ~ '" 01 ... ~ R¡ ~ ~ I\> '" 01 '" ~ ~ ... ~ 3 ~ 01 ~ ~ 0> 0 ~ 9' 0 $" Ì\> I\> :.. '" '" ~ '" 0 ~ '" '" CD ën CD ~ ... ën ~ ß -:..., 0 ~ -i 0 ~ 0> I\> 01 :.. :;:j I\> CD ~ 0 Ì\> 0 01 0> 0 '" ~ 0 '" I\> ~ ... '" '" ~ ... '" CD 0 0> '" ![ 01 CD '" ~ I\> 0 0> 0> 0 '" I\> ~ 0 0 '" en ~ c: ën c- <0 - CD So Co !!!. '" ~ () 0 3 3 CD " - U> en -i ~ ;f m en " CD :;:: ~ ~ ¡¡;- !2 r-m<"_-f !D3æ¡j¡:IlO "C-£@CD" w"I. ~_ CD ~."'C S-N-c"'tJCD:tI owml»G),gO . NÕ» CD OCD< X> 0-= !D úJú)- r- .þ.£ m CD () o en -t :II ¡¡¡ o ¡; "" ..., ;:; .. 1\)1\) 1\)1\) I\)~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ eo '" '" 0) '" .... '" I\) ~ CD 3 ....'" I\)~ aeo 0>", 0) '" .... '" I\)~ a Z ? (J 0)01 '" I\)~ ~ () "1 "1 OJ OJ ." ." '" '" '" '" 0) 01 '" '" I\) ~ ~ 0 " a.... c¡ ~og o¡ 0 a¡ a¡ o¡ o¡ c¡ ": a¡ c¡ ": "1 o¡ :JJ <T . . :;¡ 0 0 0 0 0 0 » . ()() () ()() §; ª p'" p'" p;" !i" i»" pi" ;¡: » )( )( :JJ :JJ :JJ :JJ :JJ :JJ :JJ - Z 0 »» » »» it () eo eo () () () () () () () g "tJ"tJ "tJ "tJ"tJ "tJ ;¡: 5" ;¡: 5" ;¡: 5" ;¡: ~ ~ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ "tJ » g? ~ . . 0 00 0 00 0 '" iõ '" iõ '" ~ "tJ ~ :;¡ ¡jj :;¡ ¡jj :;¡ m m m " " " " " " " ::T ::T ::T :JJ :JJ "'''' '" "'''' '" 0 0 0 0 m () () 0 ê:ê: ê, ê:~ ê, Ë iõ iõ iõ :;¡ .. ¡¡¡ '" '" '" 0. "tJ "'0 '" :P.:P. :P. :P.:P. :P. '" ;¡: 0 . ~ I~ I~ ~ ;¡: ~ '2. $ -S CD ~ õ' CD . 0. :;¡ m :;¡ 0. '" C ~ ~ I\) I\) ~ '" " '" 0> '" ~ a a a 0> ~ ~ '" I\) '" ~ '" ~ 01 ~ .... ~ '" .... a '" ~ '" m '" .... eo 0) ~ ::0 0 eo I\) 0> '" - a .... '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m ~ ~ ~ ~ ,.... ~ ,.... ,.... ,.... ,.... ,.... ,.... r r c ;r> ;r> :n :n :n :n :n :n :n =" =" :;¡ ;:; '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" r '" '" '" C .... '" ~ ~ '" '" '" ~ '" ~ ~ ~ '" '" '" '" '" '" 2- Ò1 ~ m Ì\> eo '" a .... Ò1 ~ 01 0> I\) ~ ~ ~ 01 .... '" '" 0> '" a t ~ a '" ~ '" - 01 '" m '" eo 0) '" m 0 '" 0> ~ 0> eo eo .... 0 ~ () ". ~ '" I\) ~ iu .... '" ~ ~ .... ~ ¡., g¡ ~ ¡" <0 ~ <0 ¡" ~ iu ¡" ¡" èo a ¡., iu t ~ 0 01 eo 0) .... 0 ~ a ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0) '" a 0) 01 '" 01 .... a a m . '" '" ;:; ~ '" '" '" ~ '" ~ '" '" '" '" r '" r '" '" ~ '" '" ~ ~ '" '" .. '" ~ I\) '" !" ~ ~ '" ~ .... eo ~ '" ~ '" g ~ 01 3 Ò1 ~ ~ Ò1 ëo .... ~ ~ Ì\> ... eo Ì\> m ~ .... 0 0 ~ ë.> Ò1 01 ~ 8 ~ m ë.> Ò1 ëo ~ a ~ -I 01 ùJ I\) 01 eo '" .... a '" '" 0) 0) '" eo 0) '" ª .... ~ '" I\) 0) '" 01 01 .... eo .... .... '" '" 01 '" 01 '" eo .... '" .... 01 01 '" . (J .... " '" g- O> "" ª eo '" . . () 0 3 3 .. ::0 - '" Ë ;::} m (J)"'O'" ;¡: ..0,.... m '0»", Z ¡-m<"_-t CD3Em:JJ0 "T1g~@~-n wI -. CD õr "'tJ :rI\)-o""O(Þ:O 00)",00.0 . Ñ õ »- OJ 0"'< :Þ a-== CD úJwÖ) r- ....'" m '" () o (J) -I . ........ ....,. ;; co 1\)1\) 1\)1\) 1\)1\) 1\)", ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ <Do> "'''' 01 ....'" "'~ ('J 3 "'''' 01.... "'I\) ~o <DO> "'''' 01.... "'I\) ~o Z p en.... OJ -c~ qq .... co en 0 š:: š:: š::š:: š:: š:: š:: š:: "i1 "i1 "i1 "i1 "i1 "i1 "i1 "i1 en ceo ,,' en!=' 0' ;;0 ~. ~ I I II ;r ;r ;r ;r m IjTêo o¡ CGJ :n('J enc -c -c -c -c -c -c -c -c ~ -f5 co . 5" -Q: c-1 < < < < < < < [ .... c.p> '" <D S' II> co co š:: . , . . . . . , ('J ('J ('J ('J ('J ('J ('J m _0 en ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OJ OJ q :n ~ ~ iiJO :::!:cn II> OJ OJ ~f\2 q , , , . . . . m g co co " , , , en ::j" Ï " < ::T , , , ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OJ OJ q ~r < ~ OJ OJ OJ a¡ ~ '" q -< ¡¡;š:: ~. 6' 0 I\) ~ ~ ~ ~ q , , ~. 6' co m q OJ ~~ '" 0 0 , , , . . ~ OJ a¡ en c co 0 ~ ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ q .... co 0 0 00 0 ~ q a¡ a¡ ~ '" 0 0 m '" ~ ~ co~ ~ 9' 0 ~ ~ š:: n ::T 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ 9' ~g. 9' ::T ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ii ::T ::T ::T - ::T Õ ::T ::T ::T ::T ::T " 0 01 '" ~ ~ '" ~ C 0> .... ~ ~ <D ~ '" Ï\> ë" ë" II> ~ ~ ~ 0 '" 01 ~ ~ '" '" ~ I\) '" 01 .... '" 0 0> 0 0 0 '" 0 0 '" ~ 0 ~ .... <D 0 .... ::r 0 '" <D <D - ~. ~ ~ m r ~ r r r- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m m m m m ~ r r r r r r r r c ;J> ;-n ;-n fI' 0 ;J> ;J> ;J> ;J> ;J> ;-n ;-n ;-n ;-n ;-n ;-n ;-n ;-n ::r ;; ... ... ... ... ~ r ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... c I\) ... ... ~ '" '" .... .... '" '" I\) I\) ~ ~ ... ... ... r ... ~ ... ... ::r 01 :". ~ ... '" :". <D .... 0> ~ :". ò:> ë" ~ ~ Co Ò1 :j '" 01 '" '" ~ '" 0 <D '" ~ ;; !" <D ~ Í\> ~ ~ '" Co .... '" ~ ~ ~ 01 '" 01 '" 0 '" '" 0 <D ~ 0> ... ~ ~ ... ~ .... ... ~ ... <D 01 <D $11 0 ~ ex. ¡" ~ ¡" b :.., ¡" in ('J. ... 01 01 ex. '" ¡" <0 in ex. in ~ ex. in '" 0> <D '" '" ~ '" g .. in 0> 01 '" .... '" 01 01 '" '" .... 01 ~ - '" . ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ~ ~ ... ... ~ ... ... ... ~ ¡;: ... ... ... ~ ... r ... ... ... I\) ... ... ... .... '" '" Æ> ~ I\) ~ '" ~ ~ <D ~ 01 ~ '" '" .... 3 '" :". ~ ~ ~ ò ... <D '" m .... :". ~ 5'> '" m <D 0 '" 0> '" '" <D S" ~ R! ~ 0 0> Co Ò1 Ò m ~ ~ Ò1 Co ~ <D '" Ò1 '" ~ ... ... d CD '" .... 0 '" I\) ~ '" 0> 0> '" .. '" ~ '" '" '" 01 ~ ~ 0 '" 0 ~ 0 ~ I\) 0 0 '" '" 0> CD 0> CD ~ '" '" '" '" '" 01 0 1[ .... 01 en '" .... c m 0' - '" 0 ~ 1[ ... '" - ('J 0 3 3 co ::r fir en g oj m C/}-c(D s: mG)r- m -O»ru Z ïm<;o\'.-...... m3æd)¡:no 'TI 2" ~ IÑ\ (1)< "T1 :r ~ CD \ts' _. "tJ 5'M.,,"TJfG:c oO'>",GJc.o i" ¡:¡ »~ m a<D< » D ~- ~ OJ c..>W- r- ~~ m CD o en -f ~ ...., ;; co "'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ - - - CD 0> "'''' 01" '" '" ~ 0 3 OCD 0>'" '" 01 ..'" '" ~o 2 !' 0 00 00 0r- ~ 'T1 ~~ - ~ 0 -i " (J) - - - o¡ o¡ -"; -"; ~ ~ I: I: I: 0 -. (J) æ" ~ '" ¡¡, (J) ¡g 0 ~ ~ r- 0'< 0'1: ª-~ 1* G)G) ~ ~ G) :n " :n -C » it<Þ ' 0- ;[ « G) ~. S' r- " :n " CD < CD < -i I: - - ã: CD !" o CO CD '" 3 < õ CD < ~ () <n () m n ~~. - (J)ä; CD () ~ () ;- :n iD' "(J) CD ~ .. ¡;¡ " m 0 ~ ¡;¡ õ! " -c (J) () -CD <(J) S' 0 X ::J æO " S' 'ê' S' 'ê , < ::J S' ~. ::J S' ~. íñ íñ -< 0 -. CD 'T1 íñ CD CD "1J õ' g < CD íñ (J) C I: () =' íñ ~. n -i ~ CD CD " õ' ~. Õ m <n <n' CO ¡¡¡ s: n " <n :!. or '" 'C ::J - - 0. Õ (J) r- ::J I: 9- ~ ~ () 0 ~ :D ::J ~ CD ;¡¡ ::;" CO 0 3 - CD ~ '" '" .'" .. I: 0> .. - '" '" Ò> '" '" ;; ~ '" '" - ~ '" '" CD .. - '" - 01 0 b '" .. - .. 0> ::J 0 0 0> 0> 0 I--- 0 0 01 ~ - 0 0 ¡f. r- ~ ~ ~ r- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ , ~ , ~ , ~ , c ~ in (J) ;t1 ;t1 ;t1 ;t1 ::J ;; ... ... ... ... ... 13 ... ... ... 13 ... ... ... c CD - CD - ... ... ... ... ... ::J .. '" 01 CD '" CD ... ... - ... b - '" 01 2¡ ë" '" 01 '" '" '" - - - !" 01 '" 0> - ~ m ::;: 0 '" '" ~ '" '" 01 0> CD '" '" I\) en '" ~ m - ¡" 0 Ì\) :.. CD '" ên ~ '" .. Ì\) b .. - b - .. ~ ~ 0- b b .. b .. c., CD '" '" '" 0 .... 0 0> '" '" .... CD '" .. 0 0 .. CD '" '" -. . ... -i ii '" "~ ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... ... 13 ... ... ... ... "' 0 '" - '" ... ... ... 0> ... :::: ... ... 3 -i 01 '" - CD .... - 0> '" '" - '" 01 '" '" m b èn :..., b Ò> ~ ë" CD ~ - "' "' Co - Í\> '" :I> èn Co Ò> - - 01 Í\> Ò> m -i :..., r- 0 .. CD ~ 0 0 .. ~ CD .... '" '" '" '" .... '" '" 0 .... CD 0 g II 0 '" - CD CD .... m .. .. 0 CD CD 0> 0> 0> - !!!. 13 ... (J) ... '" "' CD CD I: m b 0 0' '" - :..., 0 '" 0 0 0 ~ 0 CD CD - 0 0 3 3 CD ::J lit en S ;! m (J) " CO :s: coG)r- m "0».. 2 ïØ<;;ti;"_-I ç:¡3Eg¡:n "C"~iA.CD" Z~ CD IC::VS." <n 5'1\),,"'1JCD~ nF>..e,e,O Na- m OCO< :I> o-=: m (.o,)(,)iD r- "<0 m ( ) 0 o -i '" To: Submitted By: SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: COMMISSION ACTION: D APPROVED [X] OTHER - Agenda Request ...,¡ Item Number: Meeting Date: Oct. 28, 2003 Gc. Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] Board of County Commissioners Community Development PGA Reserve! PGA Villages - Transportation Conditions and Status Update At the Board of County COmmissioners meeting of October 7, 2003, the Board asked that staff provide and an update as to the status of the transportation conditions! obligations for The Reserve a Development of Regional Impact. FOf your review, I have attached a copy of Resolution 98·100, which is fhe most up to dale version of the Final Development Order affecting this project. With the recent addition of the PGA Villages DRI, located in the City of Port St. Lucie, there are two internal street connections that will be provided as part of the development of the parcels south of the existing PGA Reserve. These internal street connections are shown in the attached Figure 1 (Map H of the PGA Villages DRI). These Internal street connections are consistent with the basic design and traffic circulation requirements set out in the County's land Development Regulations and Comprehensive Plan (specifically Policies 1.1.8.1 and 1.1.8.2). In order to create the middle crossing Irom PGA Reserve into PGA Villages (see attached map) it will be necessary for the Board to approve the requested Major Adjustment to the existing PUD/slte plan for the areas of The Reserve known as PUO III and the Sable Creek Subdivision. This Major Adjustment Is currently under staff review. and will be scheduled for a public hearing when the application has been determined to be complaint with minimum County Codes and Standards. In addition to the above-cited major adjustment, the developers of the PGA Reserve have submitted a Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) that would serve to amend several of the traffic conditions outlined in the above table. This NOPC Is being reviewed by County, FOOT and TCRPC staff. The NOPC will likely be presented to the Board In January 2004. Finally, as noted above, the City of Port St. Lucie is in the process of reviewing The Final Development Order for the PGA Villages, a Development of Regional Impact. In that Development Order, there are a number of transportation related conditions that will affect the regional transportation network in the area. There are three (3) conditions in this Draft Development Order that are of immediate interest to the County. These condition effect the 1-95 interchange with St. Lucie Boulevard, the intersection 01 Reserve Boulevard and Commerce Center Drive. and the extension of West Virginia Drive out to Glades Cut.Qff RoadlRange Una Road, Finally, it should be noted that the developers of h PGA ViJlages have agreed to the requests of the current residents of the PGA Reserve and eliminated the internal bridge connections across the C-24 canal, effectively dividing this project into quarters (one_ quarter north 01 the canal andthree-quarters south of the canal). By eliminating this internal connection, the above described connections between the PGA Villages and the PGA Reserve become more Important. NIA NIA This is the update as requested by the Board on October 7, 2003. No action is necessary. If after reviewing this information, the Board would like additional detail on any item outlined above, please let me know. D DENIED CONCURRENCE: Reports Given County Attorney Finance.: Environ. Resources; 1'i04¡f 1\1;1'\ Mgt. & Budget: Fire Dept: Utility: Purchasing: Public Works: Engineering: ~nwP (agend743a) "'" """ COMMISSION REVIEW: October 28, 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT (Planning Division) MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Community Development Director DATE: October 22, 2003 SUBJECT: PGA Reserve/ PGA Villages - Transportation Conditions and Status Update At the Board of County Commissioners meeting of October 7, 2003, the Board asked that staff provide and an update as to the status of the transportation conditions! obligations for The Reserve a Development of Regional Impact. For your review, I have attached a copy of Resolution 98-100, which is the most up to date version of the Final Development Order affecting this project. Referencing this Development Order, Conditions Number 52 through 77 addresses the specific transportation obligations associated with this project. In the table below, staff has outlined what we understand to be the status of these conditions. Condition Number Status Comments 52 Partially Satisfied Final alignments for the extension of Prima Vista Boulevard (aIk/a SI. Lucie West Boulevard) were approved as part of the revised Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plans approved by the Board in the mid 1990's. Conveyance of the right-ol-way south of the immediate extension of Prima Vista Boulevard, west of 1-95 is to be done as part of the final plat processing for PUD III at the Reserve. 53 Partially Satisfied Final alignments for the extension of Prima Vista Boulevard (alk/a SI. Lucie West Boulevard) were approved as part 01 the revised Preliminary Planned Unit Development Plans approved by the Board in the mid 1990's. Conveyance of the right-of-way south of the immediate extension of Prima Vista Boulevard, west of 1-95 is to be done as part of the final plat processing lor PUD III at the Reserve. 53a Oncoino 53b Com Dieted 54 ComDleted 55a Completed The developers of the Reserve have posted the required security to provide for the cited improvements. Initial contributions from the developer were used to provide lor Interim signal imDrovements oreviouslv comoleted at this intersection. '-' ....,¿ October 22, 2003 Page 2 SUbject: PGA Reserve/ PGA Villages _ Transportation Conditions and Status Update Condition Number Status Comments Additional lane improvements have been folded into the general reconstruction of this intersection now underway. 55b Completed The developers of the Reserve have posted the required security to provide for the cited improvements. Initial contributions from the developer were used to provide for interim signal improvements previously completed at this intersection. Additional lane improvements have been folded into the general reconstruction of this intersection now underway. 55c OnQoinQ 56 Completed 57 Not Yet Applicable The trigger conditions have not yet been reached in non- residential development (industrial park) 58 Not Yet Applicable The trigger conditions have not yet been reached in non- residential development (industrial park) 59a Not Yet Applicable The triQQer condition has not vet been reached for all cateqories. 59b Completed The trigger condition has not yet been reached for all categories; however, the required improvements have been completed, by others. 60a Partially The trigger condition has not yet been reached for all categories; Compieted however, the required improvements to Peacock Blvd. have been completed, by others. Improvements to Prima Vista Blvd (aIk/A 51. Lucie West Blvd.) Have been partially completed- missinQ the third throuQh lanes cited in this condition. 60b Not Yet Applicable The trigger condition has not yet been reached for all cateaories. 61 (A) Not Yet Applicable The trigger condition has not vet been reached for all cateQories. 62 Not Yet Applicable The triaQer condition has not vet been reached for all cateQories. 63(A) Not Yet Applicable The trigger condition has not yet been reached for all categories; however, there is insufficient row to meet all lane reguirements. 63(B1 Not Yet Applicable The triccer condition has not yet been reached for all catecories. 63(C) Not Yet Applicable The trigger condition has not vet been reached for all categories. 63(D) Not Yet Applicable The trigger condition has not yet been reached for all categories however, the required improvements are being completed, by others. 64 Not Yet Applicable The triQcer condition has not vet been reached for all cateaories. 65 Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not yet been reached for all cateaories. 66A Completed Intersection desicn has been modified from a traditional four- '-' ....I October 22, 2003 Page 3 Subject: PGA Reserve/ PGA Villages _ Transportation Conditions and Status Update Condition Number Status Comments point intersection, to a traffic rotary that meets the same improvement obliaations. 668 Ongoing Signal warrants have not been meet for paragraphs (aO and (b). Signal warrants have been meet for paragraph (d) and are pending for paragraph (c). Developer is completing paper work (as of 10/21/03) to post security bond to cover cost of i·95 ramp sianalization. 67 Not Yet Aoolicable The triooer condition has not vet been reached for ali cateQories. 68 Not Yet Applicable The triMer condition has not vet been reached for all cateaories. 69(A) Not Yet Applicable The trigger condition has not yet been reached for all categories. Intersection design has been modified from a traditional four- point intersection, to a traffic rotary that meets the same improvement obligations. The required works have been completed bvothers. 69(8) Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all cateaories. 69(C1 Not Yet ApPlicable The triooer condition has not vet been reached for all cateoories. 69101 Not Yet Applicable The trioo-er condition has not vet been reached for all cateQories. 69(E) Not Yet Applicable The t,;¡oner condition has not vet been reached for all cateaories. 69(F) Not Yet Applicable The tdoner condition has not vet been reached for all cateaories. 69(G1 Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all cateaories. 69(HI Not Yet Applicable The triaaer condition has not vet been reached for all cateoories. 70 Onooina 71 Onooina .. 72 Comoleted The reauired improvements have been comoleted, bvothers. 73 Completed The reauired imorovements have been corTiDieted. bvothers. 74 - Completed The reauired imorovements have been completed, bvothers. . 75 Onaoina 76 Onaoina 77 Onooing With the recent addition of the PGA Villages DRI, located in the City of Port 51. Lucie, there are two internal street connections that will be provided as part of the development of the parcels south of the existing PGA Reserve. These internal street connections are shown in the attached Figure 1 '-' ....,¡ October 22, 2003 Page 4 Subject: PGA Reserve! PGA Villages _ Transportation Conditions and Status Update (Map H of the PGA Villages DRI). These internal street connections are consistent with the basic design and traffic circulation requirements set out in the County's Land Development Regulations and Comprehensive Plan (specifically Policies 1.1.8.1 and 1.1.8.2). At the Boards. meeting of October 7, 2003, several residents of The Reserve addressed the Board about a pending Major Adjustment to the existing PUD/site plan for the areas of The Reserve known as PUD III and the Sable Creek Subdivision. In order to create the middle crossing from PGA Reserve into PGA Villages (see attached map) it will be necessary for the Board to approve the requested Major Adjustment to the existing PUD/site plan for the areas of The Reserve known as PUD III and the Sable Creek Subdivision. This Major Adjustment is currently under staff review, and will be scheduled for a public hearing when the application has been determined to be complaint with minimum County Codes and Standards. In addition to the above-cited major adjustment, the developers of the PGA Reserve have submitted a Notice of Proposed Change (NOPC) that would serve to amend several of the traffic conditions outlined in the above table. This NOPC is being reviewed by County, FDOT and TCRPC staff, The NOPC will likely be presented to the Board in January 2004. As noted above, the City of Port St. Lucie is in the process of reviewing The Final Development Order for the PGA Villages, a Development of Regional Impact. In that Development Order, there are a number of transportation related conditions that will affect the regional transportation network in the area. There are three (3) conditions in this Draft Development Order that are of immediate interest to the County. These condition effect the 1-95 interchange with St. Lucie Boulevard, the intersection of Reserve Boulevard and Commerce Center Drive, and the ex1ension of West Virginia Drive out to Glades Cut-Off Road/Range Line Road. In short, the developers of the PGA Reserve are required to provide their proportionate share of the cost of expanding the '-95 interchange with St. Lucie Boulevard, before functionally any building permits are issued in this area (PGA Villages). County staff has been advised that the developers of the PGA Villages have begun the initial costing of providing for the expansion of this interchange and will likely be in a position to fund its widening will be scheduled shortly. There is a condition that calls for the possible modification of the intersection of Reserve Boulevard and Commerce Center Drive. This modification COULD result in some modification of the traffic rotary at this intersection. However, this condition also provides options that may allow this rotary to remain. At this point, no specific plans for modification of this intersection have been proposed or approved, and any such plan for modification would have to be approved by the Board. Finally, the City of Port St. Lucie has insisted on a condition in the Final Development Order for the PGA Villages that requires the reservation of a minimum 130-foot right-of-way that would ex1end West Virginia Drive oulto Glades Cut-Off Road/Range Line Road. The language in this Condition includes a restriction that there will be no construction of this roadway for at least 10 years from the approval date of the Final Development Order for this project. There are other area wide transportation conditions in this Final Development Order. We do not have a current copy of the Final Development Order for the PGA Villages in its entirety. As soon as we get one, , will transmit it to the Board for your information. Finally, it should be noted that the developers of the PGA Villages have agreed to the requests of '- -' October 22, 2003 Page 5 Subject: PGA Reserve! PGA Villages _ Transportation Conditions and Status Update the current residents of the PGA Reserve and eliminated the internal bridge connections across the C-24 canal, effectively dividing this project into quarters (one quarter north of the canal and three- quarters south of the canal). By eliminating this internal connection, the above described connections between the PGA Villages and the PGA Reserve become more important. If after reviewing this information, the Board would like additional detail on any item outlined above, please let me know. SUBMITTED: OJM RESERVD5(H) cc: County Administrator County Attorney Public Works Director County Engineer Road & Bridge Manager Scott Morton '- '" "' ":..., äi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ g '" ~ ." '" "';.:¡ ::: H~~'¡¡]e~.~ ð' ~ ~:¡¡~~~t~~.~.~ ~~"~~~I<§Jiajj~,:¡ "'J<3~",6'''' ]]111<)\ ~ ~ II U ì ì J II ~ t ~~ '1J ~ ~ ~ ~ h 0; 0; l::a'i3:1~n ~ [8J[I]I[JIII[jDm~~u ~ . "" :¡ ~ ~ ~ ~11 ~ " . - e .!! t: I:! ~ - "11' ~ ~~'t! .... ..~.- j&~! ~ ~.25 <I,J ::I~ _'5 ~-g~ ~ o.!;~·r:: ~&¡¡¡.g é:::, ~~ ~~ ~ [ L §i]'5. ~~~ ?c.$1! ~ê] 8 ~~ ~Ì!~ ~ G ~ .~ ~ 0:1 ~]ii ..J~~ ~';ä .: ~'ê3~ ~ ~~î 2: s: Z,g bt QJ 9.._ Lt,¡.~ ~~ ~èS .~ § 53 .$.J::: ~ ~ , -g Jj ¡¡ t ~ o "- ~ ~ ~ ¡¡; ~ r ~ .3=t;' G- e-. -g i! ~~~~ ~~i"'] ¡; .~ .. «JC:\ g '-' 'wi (~saM apn1 ·~S) apn1 ·~S µOd 10 Á1D ~~~"" 1::I:<1 Q.;...... 9~·S...~ œ~~Æfi~ I J~ ~<; III: III! III¡ I ~ § ø . !IJ ~~ Q':!c¡ '" ~ L I '" ·, ,. " ~j c( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 (( "3 ~4 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 ~ , f , CDO JoAnne Holman, Clerk of the Circuit Cou~ St. Lucie County File Number:1659B3B OR BOOK 1169 PAGE Recorded: 09-02-98 08:34 A.M. rJ R fiù R II \1f1 R ID~~-LU \'1 (!; n 1JU 1_ 52 -'- 4 1!>J6 I U COMMUNH'( OEVE:"'O?ME T ST. LUCiE COUNTY. Fl , .f. '-' RESOLUTION NO. 98-100 A RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTIONS 89-73, 91- 228, 93-061, 93-125, 95-195, 97-023, and 97-086 APPROVING A SIXTH AMENDMENT TO THE AMENDED DEVELOPMENT ORDER TO THE DEVELOPMENT OF . REGIONAL IMPACT KNOWN AS THE RESERVE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of 51. Lucie County, Rorida, has made the following determinations: 1. Callaway land & Cattle Company has filed a Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval with 51. Lucie County, Florida and the City of Port 51. Lucie, Florida, In accordance with Chapter 380.06, ROOda Statutes. 2. Callaway Land & Cattle Company proposes to construct 4,100 dwelling units; 1,600,000 square feet of industrial space; 300,909 290.000 square feet of retail space; 100,000 square feet of office space; and 250 hotel rooms, constituting a Development of Regional Impact on the real property legally described In Section B below, located in Sl.lucie County and the City of Port 51. Lucie, all located in the State of Rorida. .j ....., ...... ..... 3. The Board of County Commissioners of 51. Lucie County as the governing body of 51. Lucie County having jurisdiction over that portion of this project located In the unincorporated areas of 51. Lucie County, pursuant to Chapter 380; Rorida Statutes, Is authorized and empowered to consider Applications for Development Approval for Developments of Regional Impact. 4. On December 8, 1988, the 51. Lucie County local Planning Agency held a public hearing of which due notice was published in the Ft. Pierce News Tribune, .and recommended to this Board that the Development Order approval for the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve, be granted. 5. The Board of County Commissioners of-51. Lucie County, cRorldâ; on the 15th day of December 1988, held a public hearing on the Development of Regional Impact Applícãtion for Development Approval for The Reserve, and has heard and considered the testimony taken there at. ~ ~ ( ~ 6. At this public hearlng,andfollowing its closure,the Board of County Commissioners continued any further action on this application until Tuesday, December 20, 1988. - - - - - - - - - - - Dõubleundëri1nei8fãr ãdcs.Itiõñ - - - - - - £t:!!iJEe. Tl.t:e~!h is for deletion - -- Existing Language is based on Resolution 91-023 " Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 1 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 ;; PLAINTlFF's¡t- .' , EXHIBIT i (1~~.· ~ a.v¡,. ('"",,',6 "' "-¡ . '- wi OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0195 ", c( 1 7. On Tuesday, December 20, 1988, the Board of County Commissioners removed from the 2 table, the request of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact, for Development Order 3 approval. 4 5 8. The Board of County Commissioners of SI. Lucie County, has received and considered the 6 assessment report and recommendations of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. 7 8 9. On December 20, 1988, the Board adopted Resolution No. 88-357, eff.ective De<:/3mbeF 28, . 9 1988, granting development order approval to The Reserve. 10 11 10. On January 20, 1989, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council voted to appeal U,e 12 County's Development Order to the Florida Land and Water Adjudicatory Commission. 13 14 11. In March of 1989, representatives of the new project developers and the Treasure Coast 15 Regional Planning Council reached a settlement In regard to the Items under appeal and the 16 amended Development Order, resolution 89-73, reftects that settlement. 17 18 12. On March 14, 1989 this Board granted approval to ReSolution 89-73, effective March 21, 19 1989, which amended the approved Development Order for the Development of Regional 20 Impact known as The Reserve, and at the same time repealing Resolution 88-357. 21 22 13. On November 12,1991, this Board granted approval to Resolution 91-228, which amended 23 Condition Number 55 of Resolution 89-73, the approved Deyelopment Order for the 24 Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve. (. '5~ ,', ....6n jân'uaiy 22, 1993: Callaway Land and CatïfèêOmpany'filed a Notification of pròpo~e( ' ..:." .\ .6 14. 27 'Change to an Approved Development of Regional Impact, pursuant to Chapter380.06(19), 28 Aorida Statutes for a second amendment to Resolution 89-73. 29 30 15. On May 25, 1993, this Board granted approval to Resolution 93-061, which provided for a 31 second amendment to Resolution 89-73, the approved Development Order for the 32 Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve and detennined that the proposed 33 amendments did not constitute a substantial deviation to the original Development Order, 34 35 16. On July 27, 1993, this Board granted approval to Resolution 93-125, which provided for a 36 third amendment to Resolution 89-73, the approved Development Order for the Development 37 of Regional Impact known as The Reserve and determined that the proposed amendments 38 did not constitute a substantial deviation to the original Development Order. 39 40 17. At the time Resolution 93'()61 was approved by the Board, the approval was conditioned 41 upon the applicants, Callaway Land Cattle Company, fiting with Sl Lucie County, The Rolida 42 Department of Community Affairs and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Councli a ------ - - - õoubie undëriIne is fõr ãddItiõñ - - - Sed.he 'PR1!'81!!h is. for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 c Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 2 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 , '. ' , '- -' \ OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0196 ( Notification of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved Development of Regional Impact 2 for the purpose of reviewing the uplandlwetland mitigation, transportation and any other 3 related condnions effecting the development of this project by November 23, 1993. The 4 Notification of Proposed Change was to include the commentslissues presented at the 5 developer's pre-application meeting held with the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council 6 on November 18, 1992 from which there had not yet been any official filing of proposed 7 amendments 8 9 18. On May 25, 1993, Callaway Land and Cattle Company filed a Notification of Proposed 10 Change to an Approved Developmentof Regional Impact, pursuant to Chapter 380.06(19). 11 Florida StaMes for a fourth amendment to Resolution 89-73. 12 13 19. On September 21, 1995, the 5l Lucie County Local Planning AgencylPlanning and Zoning 14 Commission held a public hearing, of which due public notice was published in the Port 15 51. LUcieNewsandtheTribuneonAugust17,1995andAugust31,19950n the proposed 16 amendments to Resolution 89-73, as previously amended. 17 18 20. On October 17, 1995. Utis Board held a public hearing, of which due public notice was 19 published in Ute Port Sl Lucie News and the Tribune on August 17, 1995. August 31, 1995 20 and September 26, 1995 on Ute proposed amendments to Resolution 89-73, as previously 21 amended. 22 23 21. On October 17, 1995, Utis Board granted approval to Resolution 95-195, which provided for 24 a fourth amendment to Resolution 89-73, Ute approved Development Order for the {: 't; .. pevelopmel)t of Regionallmpa.ct known as The Reserve. .- .... . '- ..... ~. ;. .... -' , 27 22. On May 17, 1996, Ute Florida Deparbnent of Community Affairs filed with Ute Rorida Land 28 and Water Adjudicatory Commission and Notice of Appeal of the approved Amended 29 Development Order for Ute Reserve (FLWAC Case No. 96-010). 30 31 23. On December 16, 1996, Ute Rorida Department of Community Affairs and the developers of 32 The Reserve, Callaway Land and CaWe Company, Inc., entéred into a SeWement Agreement 33 for Ute purpose of addressing Ute Issues raised under Ute Deparbnent of Community Affairs 34 appeal of the approved Amended Final Development Order for The Reserve (Resolution 95- 35 195). 36 37 24. On January 23,1997, the developers of The Reserve, Callaway Land and Cattle Company, 38 Inc., requested Utat Ute Board of County Commissioners consider an amendment to the 39 Amended Final Development Order for Ute Reserve (Resolution 95-195) based on the 40 settlement agreement wiUt Ute Deparbnent of Community Affairs on their appeal of Ute 41 Approved Amended Final Development Order for The Reserve (Resolution 95-195). 42 - - - - - - - - - - - ñõuhïe undërïInë i8 fÕÏ- ãddrtiõñ - - - Stf'i](e 'PBl:!eLi.!fR is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97·023 (\ Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 3 PRINT DATE: oa/18/98 ·' , , ' '.' " ( 1 2 25. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 &g 12 13 14 15 ~ 16 17 18 19 ~ 20 21 22 23 24 (¡ "5 ~. ~ 27 28 29 30 31 32 A 33 34 35 B. 36 37 .38 C. 39 40 41 D. 42 '- ....." OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0197 On February 4, 1997, this Board granted approval to Resolution 97-023, which provided for a fifth amendment to Resolution 89-73, the approved Development Order for the Development of Regional Impact known as The Reserve and detennined that the proposed amendments, that were based on the seWement agreement between the Callaway Land and CaWe Company and the Deparbnent of Convnunity Affairs on the Department of Community Affairs appeal of the Approved Amended Final Development Order for The Reserve (ResoluUon 95-195) and further that the proposed amendments did not consUtute a substantial deviaUon to the original Development Order, . On Mav 6. 1998. Callawav land and Cattle Comoanv filed a NoUficatlon of Prooosed Chance to an ADDroved Devefoornent of Reaionallmoact. oursuant to Chaoter 380.06119\. Aorida Statutes for a sixth amendment to Resolution 89-73. On Auoust 18. 1998. this Board held a oublichearino. of which due oublic notice was oublished in the Port SI. Lucie News and the Tribune on Julv 30. 1998 on the orooosed amendments to Resolution 89-73. as oreviouslv amended. The Board believes that approving this fifIft ~ amendment to the Amended Final Development Order for The Reserve is in the best Interest of the public health, safety and public welfare of the citizens of SI. Lucie County. Aorida. and further that the orooosed amendments do not consutute a substantial deviaUon to the oriolnal Develooment Order. as amended. The 1;30¡!r.d of Coun!y Coml1}lssioners continues with the following amended FINDINGS of F'Àcf áñd CONCWSIÖÑSòf LAW witÍ1ri!gard to the Application fór' Deveiopmènt Approval as cited in Resolution 89-73: AMENDED FINDINGS of FACT The proposed Development is not in an area of Critical State Concem as designated pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 380.06, Florida Statutes. The State of Aorida has not adopted a land development plan applicable to the area in which the proposed Development is to be located. On October 21, 1988, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council issued a report and recommendations on this development pursuant to Chapter 380.06(12)(a), Florida Statutes. On August 25. 1995 the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council issued a report and recommendations on the Notification of Proposed Change to a Previously Approved - - - - - - - - - èõubieõndërrrn~i8förãddrtiõñ - -- Sh i1E~ ThI!8~~ is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 91w023 ( Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page '" PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 < ",-., (( L 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (( S .0 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ( I '- ."".¡ OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0198 Development of Regional Impact (The Reserve) pursuant to Chapter 380.06(12)(a), Florida Statutes. ~ On June 4. 1998 the Treasure Coast Reoional Plan nino Council issued a reDort and recommendations on the Notification of ProDOSed Chanoe to a Previouslv ADDroved DeveloDment of Reoionallmoact CThe Reserve!. filed Mav 5.1998 Dursuant to Chaoter 380.06(12}(a1. Florida Statutes. and determined that the OroDOSed chances to the Final DeveloDment Order for the Reserve wou1d not constitute a substantial deviation to the Dreviouslv aDDroved Develooment Order.. ~ The proposed Development is consistent with the local comprehensive plan, developm8flt laws and regulations of Sl Lucie County. CONCLUSIONS OF LAW NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Sl Lucie County, ROOda: A That in a pUblic meeting, duly constituted and assembled this 18" dav of Aucust. 1998 4" day of rebfUÐry, 199;'. Resolution 98-100. which amends Resolution 97"()23 (as corrected bv Resolution 98.086) which amends amended Resolution No. 95-195. which amended Resolution No. 93-125, which amended Resolution No. 93-061, which amended Resolution No. 91-228, which amends Resolution No. 89-73, which amended Resolution No, 88-357 granting Development Order Approval to the Development of Regional Impact known as The _. . '.' c'. Reserve... Is har.eby AP.PR9\(EDsubject to. !he. followiQ9. condltipnli, restrictions and limitations: - . -. '. '. .'. J. _. APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT APPROVAL 1. The Reserve Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval is Incorporated herein by reference. It is relied upon, but not to the exclusion of other available Information, by the parties In discharging their statutory duties under Chapter 380, Florida Statutes. Substantial cOmpliance with the representations' contained in the Application for Development Approval, as modffied by Development Order conditions, Is a condition for approval. For the purpose of this condition, the Application for Development Approval shall Include-the following items: a. Application for Development Approval dated July 9, 1987; b. Supplementalinformation dated December 3, 1987; June 15, 1988: July 22, - - - - - - - - - - - fiõuble undërï1ne is för ãddrtiõñ - - - S'h i1te Tkrsl;I!Jè. is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98~lOO Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 5 PRINT DATE: 08/10/98 ',~ ' ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (''>5 , ( _.' . > 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ( , .\ '- ....", OR BOOK ~~69 PAGE 0199 1988; July 29, 1988; and August 12, 1988; and c. Materials dated September 28, 1988; September 30, 1988; and October 6, 1988, which were received by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council after the formal Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval review process was tenninated by the applicant and local public hearings had been scheduled. d. Notice of proposed change dated May 25, 1993. e. Materials submitted January 31, 1994, August 5,1994. and February 3, 1995 with the Notice of Proposed Change/Substantial Deviation ADA for the substantial deviation determination. COMMENCEMENT OF DEVELOPMENT 2. In the event the developer falls to commence significant physicaf development for any devefopment beyond that authorized in the Devefopment Agreement within three years from the effective date of the Development Order (the earlier of two dates if separate Development Orders are Issued by Sl Lucie County and the City of Port Sl lucie), development approval shall tennlnate and lhedeveJopmenLshallblLsubjecL !aHfurtheLdevelopmenl-of,__ reglonal-impact review by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council pursuant to Section 380.06, ROOda Statutes. For the purposes of this paragraph. construction shall be deemed to have been initiated after placement of permanent evidence of a structure (other than a mobile home) on a site, such as the pouring of slabs or footings or any work beyond the stage of excavatiorror làrid·C!eanng. PhasiÍ r shàll be completed within twelve years:''Tf not completed within that time, further development shall be subject to substantial deviation review. Project buildout dates and phasing buDdout dates reflected In the ADA are extended four years. ---- -- Tenninatlon Date: This.development order shall terminate 24 years from the effective date of Resolution 89-73. March 21, 2013. Ally final development plan approvals not yet received at the completion of this 24 year period will be subject to further revIew under the provisions of Chapter 380.06, Florida Statues, or as subsequently amended. AIR 3. Clearing of specific building sites shall not commence until the developer is ready to construct the building or buildings to be located in that site unless seeding and mulching of disturbed areas are undertaken within 30 days of completion of clearing work. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - -- - - - - Double Underline is for addition SEd.he Tlu:ali!'fl. is for deletion Existing Language is based On Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 6 PRINT DATE: 08/18/96 .' "...1 ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 '(1 '')5 j .. 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 '- -' OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0200 , 4. During land clearing and site preparation, welting operations or other soil treatment techniques appropriate for controlling unconfined emissions, including seeding and mulching of disturbed areas, shall be undertaken and Implemented by the developer to the satisfacüon of the City of Port SI. Lucie, SI. Lucie County, and the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation. 5. The developer shall fumlsh a comprehensive air quality computer modeling study and, if the model shows exceedances, develop a plan and program for carbon monoxide monitoring and abatement, and implement all acüons necessary to reduce carbon monoxJde emissions to meet State and federal air quality standards according to the following minimum requirements: a. within two months of the effective date of the Development Order (the ear1ler of two dates If separate Development Orders are Issued by SI. Lucie County and the City of Port Sl Lucie; and unless an extension has been agreed upon by the developer and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council), submit a comprehensive air quality computer modeling study according to a study design approved by Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council In consultation with the Department of Environmental Regulation; b. in case of exceedances as Idenlifledby.the modeling study, submitwithin.four.. months of the approval of the modeling study a plan to mitigate project reiated traffic air quality Impacts and Implement the plan to the maximum extent possible. The plan shall be approved by the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council In consultation with the Department of environmental Regulation; and .....- .,.....-.:--..... -".-' ~...._,. "'--.. ~ .~. c. Implement and monitor the plan. HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL SITES 6. In the event of discovery of any archaeological artifacts during project construcüon, the developer shall stop construcüon In that area and Immediately notify the DMsion of Historical Resources in the Rorida Department of State. Proper protection, to the satisfacüon of the Division, shall be provided by the developer. HABITAT, VEGETATION, AND WILDLIFE 7A. WeUands 1,4,5,6,10,15,16,26,33,38,39,52,61, 61A, 616, 62, 63, 64,65,71,78,80, 81,83,84,86,89,91,92 and 93 as permitted and delineated In thejurisdiCt!onal survey and reflected on the Master Plan, Exhibit H(a.k.a. Map H) shall be retained and/or restored If necessary, and maintain6!l1n viable condition in perpetuity. The applicant shall obtain required pennit approvals to alter/restore these wetiands from the South Rorida Water - - - - - - - - - - - Double undërrInë is för ãd.drtiõñ - - - £:t:rihe 'Fhr51:i!ft is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based On Resolution 91-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 7 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 -, ~. ~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 Ú 25 ~ , ",,7 28 29 30 31 32 .33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 '- OR BOOK :1.:1.69 PAGE 020:1. ...., Management District and the US Army Corp of Engineers. To ensure that listed species of the preserved wetlands are not adversely impacted, the permit approval of the wetland alteration/restoration shall be based on coordination with and review by the Florida Game and Freshwater Rsh Commission. Any development of areas set aside for preservation or special protection of endangered or threatened plants or animals designated as endangered, threatened or species of special concem, as identified on Map H, shall be subject to development order review pursuant to Section 380.06(19)(b)16, Florida Statutes. Any alteration or modification to any other preserved jurisdictional wetland that is done consistent with any Federal. State or regional permitting agency shall not constitute a substantial deviation. Such wetlands modification shall be included in the annual Development of Regional Impact status report Map H in the Development Order shall be amended. for updating purposes, to ensure that the DRI development plan is consistent with the perm'it modification no later than six months after South Rorida Water Management District accepts certification of the surface water management system for the fourth (4th) Reserve Golf Course (PUD If). Viability and maintenance shall be assured by deed restriction, good development and drainage design plan which will indude quarrty control measures based on South Florida Water Management District's best management practices. Assignment of future preservation and maintenance responsibility shall be t6 an entity approved by the South Florida Water Management District or designated in Rule 9J-2.041(9), FAC. This assignment shall occur prior to build-<Jut of the phase in which weUands occur. Adverse impacts that occur due to factors within the developers' reasonable control, to any of the identified weUands prior to build-<Jut of this project shail be the responsibility of the developer to repair. -...... Any restoration conducted pursuant to this condition shall be completed in consultation with. -3't1d in a manner approved by, L'1e South F:Crida Water. y1âl1StiÐmant District and/or the U3 .... Anny Corps of Engineers based on consultation with Florida Game and Freshwater FISh Commission to ensure that preserved weUands are not adversely Impacted. , No building permits or certificates of occupancy shall be issued for any part of the Reserve Development of Regional Impact after the effective date of this development order (the earlier of two dates if separate development orders are issued by SI. Lucie County and the City of Port SI. Lucie), until: 1. the ditch connecting weUand 61B to the C24 outfall route has been plugged up to the rim of the weUand; and, 2. after January 1. 1997 unless all of the remaining restoration required by this condition has been completed and approved by the South Florida Water Management District. 7B. WeUands 62 and 76 shall bè preserved until such time as the Developer has created a - - - - - - - - - - - 5õuble undërITne iã för ãddrtiõñ - - - £:t:!tih!!. 'Ffl.!tð\t.!lR is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97.023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 8 PRINT DATE: 08/18/9B '. :"4 ( ( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ( ?I). \ . 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ( , ~_...- '- ...., OR BOOK :1169 PAGE 0202 replacement wetland in mitigation for these preserved wetlands to be removed. Such created wetlands shall be constructed to fully replace the functions and values equal to those of wetlands 62 and 76. No removal of wetlands 62 and 76 shall take place until the created wetlands are complete, inspected and approved by the South Florida Water Management District 7C. Any wetland habitat creation pennitted under this condition (7) shall be completed by the eartier to occur of January 1. 1997 or the issuance of any final PUD, plat or building pennit for the two thOusandth (2000th) residential unit in The Reserve. No final planned development or plat approvals shall be issued after January 1, 1994 until one of the following actions have been completed: ' 8. a. The developer has completed. to the reasonable satisfaction of the South Florida Water Management District, the creation of 50.0 acres of wetland habitat in mitigation for wetland habitat already destroyed on this project and previously required to be mitigated by South Fiorida Water Management District; or b. The developer has dedicated. by conservation easement or some other instrument acceptable to SI. Lucie County and South Florida Water Management District, to SI. Lucie County, or another entity acceptable to SI. Lucie County, and South Aorida Water Management District. 50.0 acres of upland habitat; or c. The developer has-accòinþflShéll a-cOmbinl:1lioo'( f the actions described Irr- ,. ", (a) and (b) above which is acceptable to both South Aorida Water Management District and Sl Lucie County. .. . If the developer chooses to meet all or part of this responsibility by creation of wetland habitat, then the oontinued viability and maintenance of this habitat shall be assured by deed restriction. good development and drainage plan design; and assignment of future preservation and. maintenance responsibility to any entity approved by South Florida Water Management District prior to build-out of the phase in which the created wetland occurs. If the developer chooses to meet all or part of this mitigation responsibility by dedicating upland habitat as in option (b) above: such lands shall be transferred with restrictions that require their preservation as nature habitat area. Such lands shall not be credited towards the requirement that the Developer preserve 25 percent of !fie upland habitat on site, pursuant to - - - - - - - - - - - Dõuble undëriInë is för ÃddItiõñ - - - S~rilte 'Pkl!e~k. is for deletion ------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97~023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 9 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 .''- ( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 9. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ...{ 15 '5 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 '- OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0203 , - Condition 15. d. Any wetland habitat creation permitted under this condition (8) shall be completed by the ear1ier to occur of January 1, 1994 or the issuance of final PUD or plat approval for the two thousandth (2000th) residential unit in The Reserve. . The developer will provide SI. Lucie County and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council copies of the permits or other instruments showing compliance with the above conditions. No Final planned development or plat approval shall be issued after January 1, 1995 , uniil one of the following has been completed: . a. The developer has completed, to the reasonable satisfaction of the South Florida Water Management District, the creation of wetland habitat as required by South Florida Water Management District Permits (above and beyond any wetland habitat created pursuant to the previous recommended condition), in mitigation for wetland habitat already destroyed on this project site; or b. The developer has dedicated, by conservation easement or some other instrument acceptable to SI. Lucie County and the SOuth Aorida Water Management District, to SI. Lucie County, or another entity acceptable to Sl Lucie County and South Florida Water Management District, additional uplan/i habita(;'ãcCèptable to South Aorida Water'MariaíÍement Dis'tiict··.. - (above and beyond any upland habitat deeded over pursuant to the previous conditions); or c. The developer has accomplished a combination of the actions described In (a) and (b) above which Is acceptable to both South Florida Water Management District and SI. Lucie County. d. In the event developer has been unable to complete the creation of the required additional acreage of wetland habitat as described in (a) above on or prior to January 1, 1995, It may post a security for Its completion of performance. The form and content of the Instrument providing said security shall be subject to the approval of SI. Lucie County and shall Include a sufficient amount of non-disturbed quality upland habitat acreage, as described above, equal to the acreage of wetlands which have not yet been created In accordance with (a) above. Such habitat posted In accordance with this section shall be released by the acre In exchange for - - - - - - - - - - - Dôubï@ und;rITne is fòr ãd.dItiõã. - - - £eJ!"ilEe. 'Pb.rsl:l..!fl is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 (. Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 10 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 : .., Cr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 10. 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~ ~5 ...- " 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 "'" ..,,¡ , OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0204 each acre of wetland habitat subsequently created by the Developer in furtherance of his satisfying the condition set forth in 9(a). This procedure shall be deemed to satisfy the conditions required for issuance of final planned development, plat approvals or building pennils after January 1, 1995. But under no circumstances shall planned development or plat approval be issued after January 1, 1997 without completion of wetland habitat as described In (a) above. e. Any wetland habitat aealion pennitted under this section shan be completed . by the eartler to occur of January 1, 1997 or the issuance of a final planned development or plat approval for the two thousandth (2000th) residential unit in The Reserve. , The developer will provide 51. Lucie County and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Counclf copies of the pennits or other instruments showing compliance with the above conditions. Mitigation Master Plan for the Reserve DR! must be submitted to and approved by the South Aorida Water Management District prior to wetlands mitigation required by this. D.O. occurring on site. As a minimum. the Master Plan shall set forth: a. The general criteria for construction and maintenance of wetland habitat; b. identify the location of aft proposed mitigation relative to preserved wetland and upland systems, the suñace water management system. and -devéI6pment; . .' . . ",....., .' ..,- ....--. . c. provide for a mitigation, monitoring, and maintenance program; and d. include a Justified estimate of total cost of Implementing the proposed mitigation and monItoring program. To be approved. mitigation plans must be found to fully replace the functions and values provided by exempted wetlands that have been or will be eliminated. Reasonable assurance of financial and Institutional abpity to carry out the commlbnents Inciuded in the approved mitigation plan may be provided by anyone or comblnation.o~the following: . a. a surety bond in the amounteE ual to 125 percent of the cost estimate for implementing the approved mitigation and monitoring plan; -------- - - - ñõubïe ÜnderITneis för ãddrtrõñ - - - - - - - - - S1:l!'ihe 'l"ft.t:SlIgfl. is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 (. Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 11 PRINT DATE: 08/1B/98 .... (¡ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 {l cJ--. . .1.7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ( '-' OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0205 ...,tt/ b. performance guarantee to Sl Lucie County and/or the City of Port SI. Lucie as part of a project construction guarantee. provided the guarantee adequately covers costs; c. cash bond or letter of credit from a financial institution; d. escrow agreements which inctude money, land, or improvements; and, e. performance prior to wetland loss only âpplies to mitigation for wetlands not yet destroyed. The specific form and adequacy of the guarantee shall be subject to approval by SI. Lucie County, if mitigation occurs within the County, or the City of Port SI. Lucie and the TCRPC, if mitigation occurs within the City. RnanciaJ guarantees shall not be released for any port/on of the project until WOI1< Is completed, inspected, and approved in writing by the South ROOda Water Management District. The annual report shall Include a summary of weiland mitigation accomplished pursuant to the approved master plan. A copy of the approved Mitigation Master Plan WIll be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. 11. ~ Lakes or canals shall not be excavated within 200 feet of any wetlands which are preselVed or restored on the project site. Wells In the shaHow aquifer shall not be located within 300 feet of any wetlands which are preselVed or restored on the project site. Any exceptions to this condition must be approved by the South Florida Water Management District on the -oaslso1"soil'ö( other data showing' that'W'd!e¡-'table elevations withL,preserved'we~HiiÓ5' would not be adversely affected. .-... ~..:.. A copy of any South Rorida Water Management District permit or other consent addressing this condition will be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. 12. To help assure that maintenance or Implementation of predevelopment hydroperiods occurs within the preselVed and restored wetlands and within any wetland mitigation a~, filiäl drainage plans shall provide for routing of suffiCient volumes of runoff from acceptable sources to wetlands prior to routing of any excess runoff to lake systems. Control elevations shall be established consistent with the intent to maintain or Improve predevelopment hydroperiods within all wetland areas. The South Rorida Water Management District /Dust approve the routing of runoff and control elevations as shown on the final drainage plans to achieve the intent indicated above. Copies of the South Rorida Water Management District construction permits WIll be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Plahnlng Council. - - - - - - - - - - - Dõubïe uniieri1n@iSför ãa.dItiõñ - - - ~t!!i1Ee 'Pk!!ell.3fl, is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. page 12 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 Cr 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 .(( ':15 )':.c.._ ¿7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ( """ æ BOOK 1169 PAGE 0206 '-' 13. The developer shall preserve and maintain a buffer zone of native upland edge vegetation around all preserved, restored, or created wetlands on site in accordance with the requirements of the South Aorida Water Management Disbicl. The buffer zone shall include a canopy, understory, and ground cover of native upland species including saw palmetto, wiregrass, gallbeny, Lyonia, or other upland species subjeclto approval of the TCRPC. The upland buffer may include slash pine and wax myrUe, but these species shall not be used in detennining the location of the boundary between the wetland and upland. The buffer zone requirements of preserved or created wetlands for listed species shall be In accordance with the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission guiderrnes as contained in the Florida Administrative Code, as of the time that the buffer zone is developed. The requirements of the upland buffer shall Indude a total area of at least ten square feet per linear foot of wetland, except where an expanded upland buffer has been required for protection of the Sandhill Crane as recommended by the Florida Game and Freshwater Ash Commission (provided for under the approved management plan referenced herein, and attached hereto and made a part thereof as an exhibit) and be located such that no less than fifty percent of the total shoreline is buffered by a minimum width of ten feet of upland habltal Upland buffer shall be clearly delineated, and roped off prior to any land dearing within 200 feet of any weiland to be preselVed or restored. ,. 14. No further land clearing or development activities shall take place on the Reserve DRI until: . a. . the Rorida Game and FreSh Water FISh CominìSslon and the United States Fish and Wildlife SelVice approve a management plan for protection and management of the Red-cockaded Woodpecker; and, - .." iJ. "'''St.i.ucle County is 1i)tified Ifl WriUng that the'management plaR'-Is 8f¡pl'OvÐd. .. _........ The management plan shall provide for the pennanent preservation of any colony sites deemed necessary by the Rorida Game and Freshwater Ash Commission and the U.S. Ash and Wildlife Service. Each preserve colony site shall be no less than ten acres In size and have boundaries no less than 200 feet from all existing cavity trees within the preserve. The p.reserved colony sites may be irregularly configured and should Include the best habitat for the Red-cockaded Woodpecker contiguous with the colony. The . Developer shall not develop the underland or understory within the PreselVe area. The plan shall also provide for sulliclent foraging opportunities within onlHialf mOe of the colony site to meet the recommended criteria set by the I United States Ash" and Wildlife Service Red-cockaded Woodpecker Recovery Plan. The plan must also Include a monitoring program to Insure that sufficient foraging opportunities are maintained. The plan may.be updated and ameaded and the preserve areas modified from time to time to accommodate then-current conditions with the approval of the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission andlhe U.S. Fish and Wildlife- - - - - - - - - - - - õõuhleund';riIneiSför ÃddITiõñ - - - - - - - - - StriJEe. 'Fh.!: S1::I.,!'h is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page; 13 PRINT DATE: OB/18/98 (( (( , 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 .25 5. _7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ( \... ~~ ...., OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0207 ~. " Service. It shall be the responsibility of the Developer to implement the approved plan. A copy of the approved plan shall be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. 15. The developer shall preserve no less than 25 percent (490 acres) of native upland habitat in accordance with the St Lucie County's Comprehensive Plan for land within the jurisdiction of the County and with the City's comprehensive plan for land within the jurisdk:üon of the City. Native upland habitat preserved and protected by deed restrictions pursuant to wetland buffer zone requirements and upland habitat required for the protection of species of special regional concem, including the Red-(;()C œded Woodpecker colony sites and Sandhßl Crane upland buffer, may be counted toward meeting this minimum requirement The balance of this preserved acreage may be the result of micrositing of development or selective clearing of areas to be developed, including individual lots when developed, provided maintenance of habitat is required through deed restriction. However, as a minimum, preserve areas shall be of appropriate size. quality, and arTangement to maintain existing populations of species of special regional concem on the property. No credit toward this 25 percent may be given for land set aside in compensation for wetlands destroyed by the development which are required to be mitigated. Native upland habitat is defined as areas exhibiting native species in all layers of canopy, understory, and ground cover that are present Areas with native trees, but planted ground cover do not qualify as native uplands (e.g., improved pasture). The developer shall identify on a current good quality aerial photo the areas preserved pursuant to this condition and submit the marked aerial and Indicate the acreage In the -' al'!flumeport requi~n...\¡.ySection 38.0.06..Florida StaMes.The.BDn:JaJ report slYill inclLl(le. copies of deed restrictions assuring preservation of native upland habitat acreage. Preservation on individual lots, if used to meet the habitat requirement, shall be established by the developer through pennanent deed restrictions. The annual report shall also include copies of deed or other restrictions assuring preservation of native upland habitat acreage. . .-_......~.. 16. Prior to commencement of cieating activities on any portion of the Reserve site, the Developer must survey for gopher tortoise burrows. Protecting In situ, or relocation into a suitable on-site preserve is required before development of the parcel sorveyed. Ifgopher tortoise burrows are found, any Rorida mouse, gopher frog, and Eastem Indigo snake found shall be provided for as well. The plan for protection of these species shall be reviewed and approved by the ROOda Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission and the U.S. Rsh and Wildlife Service. Mer approval of the plan, specific parcels may be cleared and developed subject to compliance with the methods and procedures stated In the plan without further approval. The annual report required by section 380.06 Rorida Statutes, shall include a summary of survey and relocation efforts prepared by a qualified biologist - - - - - - - - - - -- ÕÕuble UndërïIDe is fõr ãdditiõñ - - - Shihe. 'f'kl!e.~!,k is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 14 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 · '. ~ 1 17. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 17A 23 24 .( 25 '5., . .-,......,~ . ,¿7 28 29 18. 30 31 32 33 34 19. 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 -42 '- OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0208 -' As a minimum, the Developer shall preserve two areas that provide potential nesting habitat for Sandhill Cranes. One of these areas shall include wetlands 80, 81, and 83 and associated buffers (as identified in Map H). The other shall include portions of wetland 61, (which includes 61A or61B) and associate buffers (as more specifically identified on Map H). The developer shall, after consultation with the Florida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission, provide a species and habitat management plan by March 5, 1997, as referenced herein at DO conclusions of law and attached hereto as Exhibit B. A detailed site plan delineating the areas required by this condition shall be attached hereto and made a part of hereof. These wetlands areas shall be depicted 011 Map H as preserve areas consistent -. with Conditions 7a and 13. Management of the non-golf course portions of the buffers and the wetlands shall be pursuant to recommendations of the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. During the months of December 1, to April 30, no construction within 300 feet of any preserved or restored wetland shall occur until the wetland has been surveyed for Sandhill . Crane nests. In the event that active nests are found, construction shall not occur until July or 90 days after the eggs hatch, whichever occurs first Construction of these areas during the months and days indicated may proceed based In coordination with the Rorida Game and Freshwater Fish Commission. The application of pesticides, nematicides; and fungicides to1h~goIfcoorses'and uther areas' - - n at The Reserve shall be done only in accordance with the applicable product label instruction, shall be applied only by, or under the supervision of, Stale of Rorida licensed applicators, and shall be applied pursuant to the Integrated Pest Management Plan, attached hereto, and as it.may;.!;>e amended.from time· to time. with the 2¡Jproval of the Florida Department .of Agriculture. _." --- Prior to further development activity, the developer shall provide the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council with a letter assuring that access will be allowed to The Reserve Development of Regionat Impact in perpetuity for the purposes of monitoring compliance of the project with conditions set forth. In the event that it is determined that any additional representative of a plant or' animal species of special regio¡'at concem (as defined in the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council Assessment Report for The Reserve Development of Regional Impact) Is resident on, or otherwise is significantly dependent upon,The Reserve'DeveJopmént of Regional Impact property, the developer shall cease all activities which might negatively affeCt Îhat individuat population and Immediately notify both the Rorida Game and Fresh Water FIsh Commission and !he U.S. Rsh and Wildlife ServIce. Proper protection, to the satisfaction of both agencies, shall be provided by the developer. --------------------~---------- Double Underline is for add~tion S~f:ihe. Th.l!ðli!À is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 15 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 Q ..~ 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ~5 5' :;.7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ( "-' PAGE 0209 ..., OR BOOK 1169 20. Concurrent with construction in any phase of the development, all Melaleuca, Brazilian Pepper, and Australian Pine which occur within that phase shall be removed. Removal shall be in such a manner that avoids seed dispersal by any of these species. There shall be no planting of these species on site. DRAINAGE 21. The developer shall design and construct the stonnwater management system to retain the maximum volumes of water consistent with providing flood protection. The system shall be designed and constructed to retain or detain with filtration, as a minimum, the first one Inch of runoff or the runoff fi"om a one-hour', three-year stonn event, whichever is greater. ~~ Required retention volumes may be accommodated in a combination of vegetated swaleS, dry retention areas, lakes with vegetated littoral zones, or other suitable retention structures. All discharges from the surface water management system shall meet the applicable water quality standards as established by the ROOda Administrative Code. Completed construction pursuant to a valid South Rorida Water Management District construction pennit for a stonnwater management system shall constitute compliance with this condition. 22. The developer shall design and construct the surface water management system such that maintenance of nonnal hydroperiods within restored, preserved, and created weUands can be guaranteed against the negative Impacts of activiUes within the project boundaries, and that the functions and values provided by these habitats will be maintained. Under no circumstances shalf unfiltered runoff from impervious surfaces and parking areas be diverted direcay into wellands år(-¡(rte'. 'AnaldTilinagè'plans shall be'submitted to SCIUlli RoridäWater Management District, SI. Lucie County and the City of Port SI. Lucie. At a minimum, such plans shall depict how preserved and created weiland areas will be incorporated Into the development site plans for each indMdual development area or drainage basin with appropriate supporting infonnation to demonstrate how sufficient quantities of surface runoff from portions of the developed areas will be conveyed to weUand areas In order to maintain or improve their existing hydroperiod. Clearing of the land in a development area or drainage basin shall not begin until plans are approved by the appropriate agencies .for tlíè development area or drainage basin. Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council will be provided copies of any construction pennlts Issued by South Rorida Water Management District. 23. . The developer shall benn and swale or otherwise design and construct the golf course stormwater management systems to retain the first one-half inch of runoff from a one-hour, three-year stonn event, prior to discharge of excess water to weiland habitats. 24. Maintenance and management efforts required to assure the continued viability of preserved - - - - - - - - - - - ~uMe(m~rÜneiãf~~ni~ - -- SI:J:i u~ Tkl!el;l!fl. is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 96-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 16 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 (( L 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 '22 23 24 25 5' ¿7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 -(¡ . "'" OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0210 ...., and created wetland littoral zone and upland habitats and the proper operation of all components of the surface water management system shall be the financial and physical responsibility of the developer. Any entities subsequently approved by St. Lucie County or the City of Port St. Lucie to replace the developer shall be required, at a minimum. to assume the responsibilities ouilined above. All golf course irrigation systems shall be designed in such a manner as to allow for a minimum 100 foot separation from any existing ( ( proposed potable water well, (ref FAC 17- 6.040(4)(q». Should the waste treatment system not meet the standards of a Class I reliability, then this minimum setback shall be 500 feet. 25. The developer shall establish a vegetated and functional littoral zone as a part of the surfaèe water management system of lakes. Prior to construction of the system for èach development area ( ( drainage basin of the project, the developer shall prepare a design and management plan for the wetlandllittoral zone that will be developed as part of that system. The plan shall: a. Include plan view and site location; b. Include typical cross sections of the surface water management system showing the average water elevation after taking account the effects of wellfield pumping and irrigation withdrawals on the lake system and the ~3 foot contour (Ie. below average elevation); c. specify how vegetation Is to be established within this zone, Including the .'. exreï t:"method, typ.ò'iirld: ti/liing of any planting ur n,ulc.'1ing to be'¡jfovlded;' . and d. provide a description of any management monitoring and maintenance procedures to be followed in order to assure the continued viability and health of the littoral zone. The littoral. zone as ~tablished shall consIst entirely of native vegetation. and shall be maintained pennanently as part of the water management system. As a minimum, ten square feet of vegetated littoral zone per linear foot of lake shoreline shall be established. The plan shall be subject to approval by Sl Lucie County, the City of Port St. lucie, and the South Florida Water Management Dlsbict prior to the beginning of any excavation activity. Utforal zones shall be constructed concurrent with lake excavation _and final grading. Operational pennlts for the surface water management system shall not be issued until such time as the littoral zones have been constructed and inspected. - - - - - - - - - - - èõuble uncÏërITn;- iã för addI'tiõñ - - - £~t: iJEI~. TAl! ðl;l!'R is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 96-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 17 PRINT DATE: 06/16/96 . ~., '-' OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0211 -' (( 1 WATER SUPPLY: POT ABLE AND NON POT ABLE WATER 2 3 26. The primary source of golf course irrigation water shall be water derived from the surface 4 water management system of lakes supplemented by surficial aquifer wells as pennitted by 5 SFWMD. No withdrawals from lakes shall be pennitted which would adversely affect 6 weUands required by the Development Order to be preserved on site, or wetlands and littoral 7 zones created on site as mitigation for wetland functions and values lost as a result of this 8 developmenl At the time of water use pennit issuance or renewal, the developer shall 9 comply with applicable South Aorida Water Management District rules and criteria for pennit . 10 Issuance, whIch criteria may in the future require the use of reclaimed water. 11 12 The continued or proposed uss of surficial aquifer wells to supply irrigation water to golf 13 courses shall occur only as pennitted by South Florida Water Management District. 14 15 27. Construction of adãrtional golf courses beyond those already constructed shall not occur until 16 it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the South Florida Water Management District 17 that sufficient irrigation water.can be derived on a sustainable basis from wastewater sources 18 . and surface water management system lakes to provide for irrigation requirements without 19 adversely affecting weUands required by the Development Order to be preserved on site. or 20 weUands and littoral zones created on site as mitigation for wetland functions and values lost 21 as a result of this developmenl 22 23 28. All water use by The Reserve Development of Regional Impact shall be metered, whether 24 derived from surface water management system lakes for Irrigation or from wellfields 25 servicing The Reserve Utility Corp. for domestic use. Annual water use data shall be (( S .providod to the South Florida Water M¡:m¡gement Di¡trict !:oo Treasure.Co:JSt Region:!1 -\ _7 Planning Council as part of the annual report to be submitted by the developer as required 28 by Section 380.06, Aorida Statues. 29 30 29. To reduce the demand for irrigation water, a minimum of 30 percent of all landscaping 31 material and 50 percent of all planted trees shall be native plants adapted to the soli and 32 climatic conditions occurring on site. 33 34 30. To the maximum extent consistent with weUand protection, surficial aquifer wellfields serving 35 The Reserve DevelopMent of Regional Impact shall be located such that principal land uses 36 within the cone of Influence of such wells are open space, preserve, or residential area. In 37 no case shall development which would use, handle, store,· or produce hazardous or tpxlc 38 materials occur within the cone of Influence (I.e., one foot drawdown area) of a surficial 39 aquifer potable water supply well, unless such use, handling, storage, or production is 40 consistent with binding wellfield protection regulations. 41 .42 31. ji1 no case shall reverse -osmosis reject water be utilized for Irrigation purposes unless -------- - - - ÕÕuble ündërïIn:- is fòr ãdè.ITiõñ - - - Ct:.l!iJ£e. 'Fànli!À is for deletion -------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 (, Resolution 96-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 18 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 . (I 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 G '6 _7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 4'2 \ '-' ..." OR BOOK ~169 PAGE 02~2 \ approved by the appropriate state permitting authority. 32. Water-saving plumbing devices shall be required in all construction (both residential and nonresidential) to reduce potable and nonpotable water demand. These devices shall include low lIush toilets and efficient faucets and shower heads to help reduce the use of potable water for these uses. 33. Rates charged for potable water use shall be structured to encourage water conservation. 34. All residential water requirements shall be supplied by a common utility which shall provide water service to all exisÖl1g and proposed development, except Sabal Creek Phases I, II, III and IV. 35. No final planned development or plat approval shall be issued for The Reseive Development of Regional Impact beyond construction authorized by the Development Agreement executed by the Department of Community Affairs, unbl the South Florida Water Management District notifies Sl Lucie County and the City of Port Sl Lucie In writing that the method of providing potable and nonpotable water needs to such further development proposed by the developer is permitted and will not have adverse Impacts to: a. wetlands required by the Development Order to be preserved on site or wetlands and littoral zones created on site as mitigation for wetland functions and values lost as a result of this development; b. the potentiometric head of the Floridan Aquifer, if applicable; and ~~-'.... ~ ., . ... -~.'''--:''''" ". --" ....<: -. ".> ,,~- the ability of existing legal users to meet their permitted potable and nonpotable requirements. c. Parameters and methods of hydrologic investigations undertaken to demonstrate that a sufficient source of water is available to serve further development proposed by the developer without adversely impacting the Items listed above shall be established to the satisfaction of the South Rorida Water Management District Receipt of a valid South Rorida Water Management District consumptive use permit for a withdrawal shall Cónstitute compliance with this section. 36. All residential, commercial and industrial water and sewer requirements shall be supplied by the a common utility which shall provide water and sewer service to all existing and pro'pÕsed development, except Sable Creek Phases I, /I. and IV. and Reserve Plantation I, IIA. and /lB, which contain lots which are in excess of the minimum requirements of one-half acre and any lõts proposed within Sable Creek Phase /II (56 acre parcel) providing such lots be at least one acre ill size. At such ~time. and .in the event waterandlor sewer lines are made - - - - - - - - - - - Dõuhle UnderïInë is fõ'r ãdc:I.ltiõñ - - - £'erihe 'FM!ali~ is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based. on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 19 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 . . . (( -{( ¿ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 _1 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ( \ow OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0213 -' available to lots contained the subdivisions referenced herein, they shall be required to hook up to the common utility service then provided by the utility company. 37. Any consents or other approvals required from the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council and/or in consultation with other govemmental agencies, as a condition to further development approvals being issued after the effective date of the development order, shall not be subject to unreasonable delay after all submissions and other data required by such agency (including TCRPC) from developer, has been supplied. 38. Maintenance and management efforts required to assure the continued proper operation of all components of the central water supply system shall be the financial and physical . responsibility of The Reserve Community Development District until such time as it may be conveyed to another entity. Any entities subsequently authorized to replace The Reserve Community Development District shall be required, at a minimum, to assume the responsibilities outlined above or delegate such responsibilities to another entity to the satisfaction of the City of Port 5t Lucie and 5t Lucie County. Appropriate plans, specifications and applications for the water plant expansion shall be submitted to the Department of Envirqnmental Protection (DEP) upon the existing water treatment facility reaching a finishing water maximum day demand equal to 80% of the DEP's rated plant capacity. Construction of the expansion shall begin before or when the facility achieves a maximum day finished water production equal to 90% of DEP's approved rated plant capacity. )~ ..1'; 39. The unobligated Floridan Aquifer well as referenced on Map F, dated July 1987, revised --November 1988; as contaiood-In ·The ReserJa Development.:>f Regicnal JmpactAppliœlion . for Development Approval, shall be capped and abandoned in accordance with South Aorida Water Management District aiteria prior to commencement of development outside the area authorized for development In the Development Agreement The obligated well referenced on Map F as described above shall be capped and abandoned in accordance with South Florida Water Management District criteria within 30 days of resolving such obligation for off-site use. '. WASTEWATER 40. Development shall only occur concurrently with the provision of adequate central wastewater treatment services. Prior to application for building permits for any part of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact at the beginning of each phase, the developer ¿hall demonstrate that adequate treatment facilities will exist on schedule to handle all wastewater generated from both completed and planned development Evidence of adequate treatment and disposal capability shall be subject to approval by St Lucie County and the City of Port SI. Lucie in consultation with the DepaFtmefltof Environmental Protection. ---------------~----~---------- Double Und@r11ne is for add1tion Stlih!. Th~81:1.!fk is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 96-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 20 PRINT DATE: OS/18/98 ·, (( l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 { ~~ -.- ¿7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ( 'OW OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0214 .." The central wastewater treatment system shall be expanded based on the following now capacities (actual 3 peak month average da~y): a. When nows reach 60% of pennitted capacity, a consultant will have been chosen. b. When nows reach 70% capacity, appropriate plans, specifications and application for wastewater plant expansion shall be submitted to the Department of Environmental Regulation. c. When nows reach 75% capacity, construction shall begin and be completed and certified prior to flows reaching 95% of pennitted capacity. 41. The existing and proposed wastewater treabnent and disposal system shall be constructed or modified to produce irrigation quality water so that spray Irrigation of such water will be the primary wastewater disposal method. Excess wastewater may be disposed of through percolation ponds, as pennitted. 42. Maintenance and management efforts required to assure the continued proper operation of all components of the central wastewater treatment system shall be the financial and physical responsIbility of The ReselVe Community Development Disbict until such time as conveyed to another entity. Any entities subsequenlly authorized to replace The Reserve Community Development District shall be required, at a minimum, to assume the responslbflities oullined above ·or delegate such responsibilities to another entity to the satisfaction of SI. Lucie County and the City of Port SI. Lucie. .~ '-. ..,¿,..... . ...: ':.."""...,.. ._r:·· HAZARDOUS MATERIALS AND WASTE 43. Within three months of the effective date of the Development Order (the eariier of two dates if separate Development Orders are issued by St. Lucie County and the City of Port SI. Lucie), the developer shall submit a hazardous materials management pian for review and approval by the City of Port SI. Lucie, and SI. Lucie County In consultation with the South Florida Water Management District and the Department of Environmental Protection, If salð approval is not obtained within six months of the effective date of the Development Order, no further final planned development approvals or plats shall be issued for any part of the project until approval is obtained. The plan shall: a. require discfosure by all owners or tenants of non- residential property of all hazardous materials proposed to be stored, used, or generated on the premises; b. require inspection of all business premises storing, using, or generating - - - - - - - - - - - ÕÕuble und;rITn';- is fõr ãdc1Itiõñ - - - iSh ¡he. TAre Li..!fð. is for d.e:letion - - - - - -" Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. page 21 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 (( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ~ð-'- 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 "'" " t .....,.J PAGE 0215 OR BOOK 1169 ~ hazardous materials prior to the commencement of operation, and periodically thereafter to assure that adequate facilities and procedures are in place to properly manage hazardous materials projected to occur; c. provide minimum standards and procedures for storage, prevention of spßls, containment of spills, and transfer and disposal of such materials; d. provide for proper maintenance, operation, and monitoring of hazardous materials management systems Including spill and hazardous materials containment systems; e. detail actions and procedures to be followed in case of spills or other accidents invoMng hazardous materials; and f. guarantee financial and physical responsibility for spill cleanup. MONITORING AND COMPLIANCE 44. In addition to all Infonnation required by Chapter 380, Aorida Statutes; by Chapter 9J-2, Florida Administrative Code; by Sl Lucie County; and by the City of Port Sl Lucie for inclusion in an annual report to be prepared and submitted by the developer for The Reserve Development of Regional Impact, the following Infonnatlon must be Included: a. current, good quality aerial photo showing native upland habitat preserved pursuant to the Development Order, acreage of the preserved areas, and ""COpies ofdaed restrictlons'ElSSUring~rvation of nauve upland habl/a¡ acreage; - ".'\. ..~...... .... . ~.:' ...-. .' b. summary of Gopher tortoise surveys and relocation efforts as required by the Development Order; and c. water use data (amounts from all sources) per Development Order condition requiring metered water use sources. EDUCATION 45. -From the date of enactment of this resolution, until January 1, 1989, any residential' development pennitted within The Reserve, shall be subject to the voluntary school assessment incorporated as a part of that unit's development approval. Effective January 1, 1989, all residential development within this project shall be subject to the tenns and requirements of 51. Lucie County Ordinance 88-16, School Impact Fees, and as may . sUbsequently be<lmended.-·· --. - - -. - - - - - - - - - - - - ÕÕuble undërline is fõ'r ãd.ditiõñ - - - Ct:!I!"iha 'åiJ!SI:I.!k is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 22 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 ·. "'"' œ BOOK 1:1.69 PAGE 02:1.6 -...I ( ! RECREATION AND OPEN SPACE 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (( >-.~- _7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ·42 48. 46. The developer shall reserve a minimum of eight acres of land in four parcels no less than two acres each in size to be deeded free and clear of all liens and encumbrances to homeowners' associations within The Reserve Development of Regional Impact for the establishment of recreational facilities geared to the needs of children living within the development Parcels shall be reserved in an arrangement that will most conveniently serve the most residents based on proximity of residential areas. The developer shall establish a fund of not less than $5,000 for each parcel to be tumed over to the appropriate homeowners' association to provide Initial funding for faCIlities òn each parœl. The appropriate equipment or facilities to be developed on each parœl shall be determined by the homeowners' association. 47. Within one year of the effective date of the Development Order (the latter of two dates if . separate Development Orders are issued by St Lucie County and the City of Port St Lucie), the developer shall provide a plan for the provision of beach access points and parking facilities to meet the demand created by residential development in The Reserve Development of Regiònal Impact. The plan shalllnciude an evaluation and estimate of the demand for beach access points in both St lucie and Martin Counties. The methodology used to project beach access and parking demand shall be agreed upon by the developer and approving agencies prior to plan Initiation and shall be submitted as part of the completed plan. The plan shall provide a program for meeting any projected demand. The plan must be approved by St Lucie County. Martin County, and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning CounCIl may provide the county comments òn the plan. If approval is not obtained within two years of the effective date of the Development Order as aforementioned, no further building permits shall be issued for any part of the project until approval is obtained. Beach access poinls-Ðnd parking facilities shall.oo GOrnWuctad and .nvallabla to Sef'.1) prcj::...-!e:j demand ir1 accordance with the approved plan. Subject to the foregoing, improvements required of the Developer shall not exceed, In proportion to the level of service or facilities made available by the respective Counties for their residents. '........... POLICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY Prior to the issuance of any bUilding permits, In any portion of this project in the unincorporated areas of SI. Lucie County, the following assessment shall be paid' for the purpose of police/public safety: Residential: Single Family Multt-Famlly $111 perunit $ gg per unit Office: Medical Office $231 per 1000 sf - - - - - - - - - - - fiõuhie Underline is för ãddItiõñ - - - StHI!iJEa Th.t:SLi!'h. is for deletion -----"- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. ( page 23 PRINT DATE: 06/16/96 (( ¿ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 (( -; 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 '( ., """ OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0217 ~ -...,; Financial Office Other Office $506 per 1000 sf $127 per 1000 sf Retail: o - 49,999.9 sf 50,000 - 99,999.9 sf 100,000 - 199,999.9 sf $250 per 1000 sf $298 per 1000 sf $299 per 1000 sf Hotel/Motel $111 per unit Upon the enactment of a fonnal public safety (police) Impact fee ordinance by the St-Lucllf- County Board of County Commissioners, the tenns and conditions of that ordinance shall apply to the unincorporated portions of this project, described in Section B of this resolution. FIRE PROTECTION 49. The developer shall reserve one parcel, a minimum size of two acres and configured to meet the needs of the Sl.Lucle County/Ft. Pierce Fire District, within the Reserve Commerce Pari<. This sIte shall be conveyed to the Fire Disbict In a manner and time acceptable to the Fire District, if so required. Prior to the issuance of any building permits for any residential unit within The Reserve, including any hoteVmotel unit, the developer shall pay to the St. lucie County/Fl Pierce Fire District the sum of $225 per unit to meet the fire protection needs of this development. . Up::n4he enactmeRt·çf-.¡¡,,formalpublic safety (fire) Irnpact fee.D~il'lance .b)'the St.,Vlde. . ~. . County Board of County Commissioners, the tenns and condiUons of that ordinance shall apply to those portions.of this project, described In Section B of this resolution. ........,..-....: ENERGY 50. In the final site and building design plans, the developer shall: a. incorporate those energy conservation measures identified on pages 250.1 and 250.2 of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval; b. comply with the Aorida Thermal Efficiency Code Part Vii, Chapter 553, Fioiida Statutes; and, c. to the maximum extent feasible, incorporate measures identified In the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's Regional EnergyPlan dated -May; 1979,-and the _. __ - - - - - - - - - - - D'õuhîeünd'ërUn;-isfõr ãddItiõñ - - - - - - - - _ ~~~ihe ~~5~5à is for deletion EXisting Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 24 PRINT DATE: OS/18/98 ( ( l. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (( ?5 1" .1.7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 ""'" ...., OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0218 , Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council's Regional Comprehensive Policy Plan. As a minimum, the developer shall demonstrate that incorporation of energy conselVation measures already committed to and those measures to be incorporated by the requirement of Condition 51 below has reduced projected energy demand by 20 percent below that demand which would have occurred without incorporation of the measures. 51 . The developer shall incorporate each of the 17 energy saving methods outlined in the ENERGY section discussion of the Treasure Coast-Reglohal Planning Council's Assessment Report for The Reserve Development of Regional Impact unless it can be demonstrated to the satisfaction of the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council that individually each method is not cost effective. ' TRANSPORTATION 52. No building pennits shall be issued after the effective date of the Development Order (the earlier of two dates it separate Development Orders ate Issued by S1. Lucie County and the City of Port Sl Lucie) for the ReselVe Development of Regional Impact untü the necessary right-of-way owned by Callaway Land & Cattle Company along the westerly extension of Prima VISta Boulevard has been dedicated free and clear of aliI/ens and encumbrances to Sl Lucie County or Aorida Department of Transportation as necessary and consistent with the Sl Lucie County Thoroughfare Plan for Prima VISta Boulevard, and Intersections thereof, and as necessary to provide for ultimate laneage of Prima VISta Boulevard. 53. Prima Vista Boulevard, west of 1-95, shaD be designed as a primary public access route exte!n'dilrg from the 1-95 interchange to Lie west/southwest propetiy ïines (If The Rese/ve. '" . Development of Regional Impact, and appropriate right-of-way shall be dedicated to provide for such an alignmenl Design and construct/on of the roadway shall maintain acceptable levels of service on both Prima VISta Boulevard and 1-95 and meet the requirements of the Florida Department of Transportation and the Federal Highway Administration. .....~. . 53A Within the ReselVe Commen:e Center, industrial land use may be exchanged for the following altemate land uses, so long as the total pm peak hour, peak direction traffic. impact from all uses within the Reserve Commerce Center does not exceed the current approved traffic Impact attributable to Industrial development: - - - - - - - - - - - Douhle Underlin@" is tår ãdd.rtiõñ - - - St:l!ihe 'PiU!'BI:I.!fh. is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 91-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 2S PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 " . Cr 1- 2 3 4 5 6 e 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 C "'I ¡ 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 ( """ OR BOOK :1169 PAGE 02:19 >oJ 111!11i~'II!;I~, Industrial 1,200.000 sq II 8.800 1.557 (currenU 8 Phase III) 400 bed. 1,060 113 72 beds 197 9 225 beds 484 39 120,000 II 4,522 475 Retirement Hme Nursing Home ÀeLF Medical Center 53B. Following approval of the development order modification necessary to pennlt the location of the public access road from the 1-95 Interchange north through The Reserve Commerce Center connecting to Glades Cut-0ff Road, the developer shall immediately commence survey, design and pennitting wol1< for the construction of the road. The road shall be constructed within two years after approvaf of the amended Development Order modification. This period may be extended due to delays In pennittlng and approval by action of the governing bodies of the City of Port Sl lucie and Sl Lucie County approving a written request for extension from the developer; however, the road shall be constructed and open to the public within one year after receMng all pennlts for its construction. No building pennlts for any residential development associated with the fourth golf course shall be issued until the road Is completed. 54. No building pennlts for n'òn-i'ndustriaTdevélòjimentof mô¡'è than 225 residential (1395'dally trips) units shall be Issued for The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have .been let for the construction of intersection improvements to obtain the following configuration, Including signalization or signalization ·modification as warranted by city, county, or state criteria, as applicable. a) First stage '-951Prima Vista Boulevard Interchange b) Prima Vista Boulevard and West Peacock Boulevard NorthboulJd West Peacock Blvd. One left-tum lane- One through lane- One right-tum lane" Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-tum fane' One through lane One through/right-tum lane - - - - - - - - - - - 5õuhïeundërfIn@"iSför ãd4rtiõñ - - - - - - - - - Sh ihe Th.rsl:I.!fÀ is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97~023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 26 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 C l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 55A. 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ( 5 -, ~7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 ~O 41 42 '-' .",., OR BOOK J..169 PAGE 0220 Southbound West Peacock Blvd. One left-turn lane" One through lane One right-turn lane" Westbound Prirna Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane" Two through lanes One right-turn lane" " Intersection improvements beyond current configuration. "" Only required if development access exists. AU above configurations shaU be permitted and constructed in accordance with city, county, or State criteria, as applicable. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for nOn- Industrial development of more than 225 residential units (1395 Daily Trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the intersection improvements under a) and b) above have been completed. No building pennits .shaU be issued for The Reserve Development of Regional Impact after January 5, 1996, until an acceptable dean and irrevocable Letter of Credit, or other fonn of funding or security acceptable to Sl Lucie County, is provided to Sl Lucie County in a sufficient amount to design, penni\, and construct Intersection signalization at West Midway Road and Glades Cut-Off Road. No Certificate of Occupancy shall be issued in The Reserve Development of Regional Impact after June 30, 1996, until the intersection of West Midway . Road and Glades Cut-Off Road Is signalized. 'Sufficient amounr shall be detennlned by an engineer's Projection of Probable Cost supplied by the developer and approved by the County Engineer. (;.'... 'iI/oo..... ........,..,. ...... a) West Midway Road and Glades Cut-Off Road Northbound Glades Cut-Off Road One left-turn lane' One through lane One right-turn lane' Eastbound West Midwav Road One left-turn lane' One through lane One right-turn lane' Southbound Glades Cut-off Road One left-turn lane' One through/right-turn lane Westbound West Midwav Road One left-turn lane' One through lane One right-turn lane' " Improvements beyond current configuration. All above configuration, including signalization as warranted, shaU be pennitted and constructed in accordance with city, county, or state criteria, as applicable: ----- - - - - - - - - - - - i5õuble tJn&rUne is fõ%- ãdd.Itiõñ - - - 6it:fi.1£e 'Pkreki!R is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 91-023 ( Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 27 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 (, 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 4 5 ¿7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 55C. '-' ...., OR' BOOK 1169 \ PAGE 0221 No building permits shall be issued for more than 448 (2,778 daily bipsJ residential units and 95,000 square feet of industrial development (526 daffy bipsJ or after twelve (12) months from the effective date of this Development Order unless the improvements listed under a) above have been let for construction. 55B. No building permits for non-indusbial development of more than 800 residential units (4250 daily trips) and 95,OOO square feet of Indusbial development (526 daily bips) or after December 31, 1996, whichever occurs first, shall be issued for The Reserve Development of Regiona/lmpact unless the following intersection Improvements, as needed to provide Leve/ of Service "D" peak season conditions, are contained In the current year of the Five Year Capita/Improvement Program, or cóntracts have let been let for their construction. In order to permit further development In the Reserve Commerce Center, 1,000 square feet òf indusbia/ use in the park may be substituted for each of 11 residential units, provided that the total daily bip generation does not exceed 4,776 trips. a) West Midway Road and Glades Cut-off Road Northbound G/ades Cut-off ROM One left-turn lane' One through lane One right-turn lane' Eastbound West Midwav Road One left-turn Jane' One through lane One right-turn lane' Southbound G/ades Cut-off Road One left-tum lane' One through/right-turn lane Westbound West Midwav Road One left-turn lane' One through lane One rir¡ht-tumiane' u ':0...... ...'. , Improvements beyond current configuration. All above configuration, including signalization modifications, shall be permitted and constructed in accordance with city, county, or state criteria, as applicable. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be Issued for more than 95,000 square feet of inpw;triáT development (526 daily bips) and 800 residential units (4,250 dally bips), or some combination thereofin accordance with this condition (not exceeding 4,776 daily bips) In the Development of Regiona/lmpact known as The Reserve, or after December 31, 1996, whichever occurs first, until the Intersection improvements cited above needed to proldde Level of Service 'D" peak season conditions havébeen completed or are Included ili the current year of the SI. Lucie County Capital Improvements Program. Commencing in January 1997, the developer shall undertake an bl-annuall!'affic monitoring program at the· Intersection of West M'KIway·Road alidGlades Cut..Qf Road. This program -------- - - - Dõuhle undërïIne is för ãdd1tiõñ - - - - - - - - - .nr:i.JEe Tlu:e.~!k is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 28 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 ·, (, 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 C 25 ; ~l 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ( "" OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0222 ...., shall be conducted during the months of January through March. The following analysis shall be preformed on an annual ba,¡is until all of the improvements identified in Condition Number 558 above have been implemented: 1. Perfonn AM and PM peak hour tuming movement counts for one hundred and twenty (120) minutes during each period to capture the maximum sixty (60) minutes peak period. These counts shall include truck counts and shall be prefonned in fifteen (15) minute increments. . 2. Perfonn a capacity analysis of each peak hour 10 detenT1ine existing level of selVice at the intersection for both AM and PM peak hours. 3. Forecast traffic demands for each tuming movement using background traffic as well as projected development within The ResOlVe for two years. 4. Perfonn capacity analysis using the forecasted AM and PM peak hour tuming movements to detennine future level of service. 5. Identify improvements necessary at the intersection to provide Level of SelVÍce "D" during peak hour conditions and the month and year (exceedance date) when the improvements will be needed, if the intersection Is projected to exceed Level of SelVice "D". When an exceedance date is detenT1ined. buDding pennils shall not be Issued after the construction date until the needed improvements are let for construction. The construction .."" . date is defil1ed as six (6)moRths''Põior to the e~nce date. Des¡gl1 and porm¡¡¡¡;:g of . .. .. these improvements must be complete by the construction date. When an exceedanœ date Is detenT1lned, Certificates of Occupancy shall not be Issued after the exceedance date until the improvements are completed. This condition Is valid until the improvements identified in Condition 558 have been implemented. This annual monitoring report shall be submitted with the annual report required under Part E, of this Resolution. 56. No building pennils for non-industrial development shaD be issued for more than 1.000 residential units (6.073 daDy trips) of The Reserve Development of-Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the construction of Intersection Improvements to obtain the following configuration. including signalization or signalization modification as warranted by city, county or state criteria, as applicable. . - - - - - - - - - - - 6õu5ïe ÕnrlerITne is fõ'r ÃdclItiõñ - - - CtJ:'!i]¡e TÀfStI.!B. is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 29 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 (( ~( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ?5 1)" 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 "" ~ r ~ , OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0223 ...., a) Prima Vista Boulevard and Bayshore Boulevard Northbound Bavshore Blvd. One left-tum lane One through/right-tum lane Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-tum lane One through lane One right-tum lane Southbound Bavshore Boulevard One right-tum lane" One through lane One left-turn lane Westbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane One through/right-turn lane " Intersection improvements beyond current configuration. All above configurations shaH be pennitted and constructed in accordance with city, county, or State criteria, as applicablo. No Certificates of Occupancy' shaH be issued for non- industrial development of more- than 1,000 residential units (6,073 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the intersection improvements under a) above have been completed. 57. No building pennits shall be issued for industrial development within the Reserve Commerce Center generating more than 250,000 (1,383 dany trips) square f~t of. The ReselVe Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following roadway improvements, including all necessary bridge structures (development level thresholds may ..- . be increased if it is dermñsträted through ·the traffic monitoring"program tftdt aJtiitional development may be accommodated without exceeding level of SelVe "D" peak hour, peak season, or level of SalVice ·C· under average annual daily conditions): a) Four-lane West Midway Road from 1-95 to Oleander Avenue. No Certificates of Occupancy for Industrial development within the RoselVe Commerce Center generating more than 250,000 (1,383 dally trips) square feet of The ReselVë Development of Regional Impact shall be issued until the roadway improvement under (a) . above has been completed (development level thresholds may be increased if it Is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that additional development may be accommodated without exceeding level of Service ·D" peak hour, peak season, or level of SelVice ·C" under average annual dally conditions). 58. No building permits shall be issued for industrial development within the ReselVe Commerce Center generating more than 250,000 (1,383 dally trips) square feet of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following roadway - - - - - - - - - - - ÕÕuble underline is för ãëidrtiõñ - - - &erihe Tlu::sl:I.!À is for deletion ------ Existing u~guage is based On Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. page 30 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 '. ., (( ¿ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 C;2~ - , 28 29 30 59. 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 "" OR BOOK 1.169 PAGE 0224 -' improvements, including all necessary bridge structures (development level thresholds may be increased if it is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that additional development may be accommodated without exceeding Level of Serve "0" peak hour, peak season, or Level of Service ·C" under average annual daily conditions): a) West Midway Road and South 25th Street (SI. James Drive) Northbound South 25th SI. One left-turn lane One through lane One right-turn lane* Eastbound West Midwav Road One left-tum lane· One through lane Second through lane· One right-turn lane· Southbound South 25th SI. One left-turn lane Second left-turn lane* One through lane One right-turn lane· Westbound West Midwav Road One left-turn lane One through lane Second through lane· One right-turn lane . Improvement beyond current configuration. No Certificates of Occupancy for industrial development within the Reserve Commerce Center generating more than 250,000 (1,383 daily trips) square feet of The Reserve Development of RegiOriallmpact shall be issued until the roadway Improvement under a} above has been completed (development level thresholds may be Increased if It is demonstrated through-the traffic monitoring progòam ·that addition..; developmoo!'may be accommodated without exceeding Level of Service "0" peak hour, peak season, or Level of Service "C· under average annual daily conditions). No building permits shail be Issued for non-industrial development of more than 1,494 residential units (9,073 daily trips), a 15O-room hotel (1,261 daily trips), 65,000 square feet of commercial (5,616 daily trips), and 30,000 square feet of office (556 dally trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the ~lIowing - roadway improvements, inCluding all necessary bridge structures (development level thresholds may be increased If It is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that additional development can be accommodated without exceeding Level of Service "D" peak hóur, peak season, or Level of Service "C" under average annual daily conditions): a) Six lane Prima Vista Boulevard from 1-95 to West Peacock Boulevard. b) Four-lane Prima VISta Boulevard from Cashmere Boulevard to Bayshore Boulevard. .' - - - - - - - - - - - - -, - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - ~.e Undp-rlinf!: i8 for add1tion St:.I!i]u~ ·F}I!~e'l:l!fi. is for deletion Existing ~:ruage is ba.sed on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 31 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 .' .' C l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (( 25 s-- _7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 \..- ..., OR BOOK ~~69 PAGE 0225 , No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for non- industrial development of more than 1,494 residential units (9,073 daily trips), a 150-room hotel (1,261 daily trips). 65,000 square feet of commercial (5,616 daily trips), and 30.000 square feet of office (556 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the roadway improvements under a) and b) above have been completed. 60. No building permits shall be issued for non-industrial development of more than 1,494 residential units (9,073 daily trips), a 150-room hotel (1,261 daily trips), 65,000 square feet of commercial (5,616 dally trips), and 30,000 square feet of office (556 daily trips) of the Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following intersection improvements, including signalization modifications as warranted by city, county, or state criteria, as applicable (development level of thresholds may be increased if it Is demonstrated through the traffic monitoñng program that additional development can be accommodated without exceeding Level of Service "0" peak hour, peak season, or Level of Service "C" under average annual daily conditions): a) West Peacock Boulevard and Prima Vista Boulevard Northbound West Peacock Blvj . One left-turn lane- One through lane- One right-turn lane- Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane' One through lane Second through lane . One throughlright-turn lane' Southbound West Peacock Blvj . --.. ,··-One left-turn-lane One through lane One right-tum lane Westbound Prima Vista Blvd. Ona left-turn lanc" Two through lanes Third through lane' One right-turn lane ..' -".. .. b) 1-95 and Prima Vista Boulevard (1) Add two-lane parallel structure. (2) Northbound - one right-tum lane. (3) Southbound.. one right-turn lane. (4) Southbound - second left-tum lane. , Intersection improvements beyond current configuration. " - Only required if development access exists; All of -the above configurations shall be permitted and constructed in accordance with city, - - - - - - - - - - - Dõuble UndërïIn@" is fõr ãdc1.rtiõñ - - - £t!:"illEe 'Phral!~ is for d.eletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 91-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 32 PRINT DATE: 08/16/98 ,.' ( .( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 61- 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 C' )~.~, _7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 """ ...,J OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0226 \ county, or State Cliteria, as applicable. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for any non- industrial development of more than 1,494 residential units (9,073 daily trips), a 150-room hotel (1,261 daily trips), 65,000 square feet of commercial (5,616 daily trips), and 30,000 square foot of office (556 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the improvements under (a) and (b) above have been completed. No building pennits shall be issued for non-industrial development of more than 1,494 residential units (9,073 daily trips), a 15O-room hote! (1,261 daily trips), 65,000 square feet of commercial (5,616 daily trips),'and 30,000 square feet of office (556 daily trips) of the Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following intersection improvements, including signalization modifications as warranted by city, county, or state criteria, as applicable (development level of thresholds may be increased if it is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that .additional development can be accommodated without exceeding Level of Service "0" peak hour, peak season, or Leve! of Service "C" under average annual daily conditions): . a) Bayshore Boulevard and Prima Vista Boulevard Northbound Bavshore Blvd. One left-turn lane One through/right-turn lane One through lane Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane Second left-turn lane" Second through lane" One right-turn lane .~ . ~ ..~.- Southbound Bavshore Blvd. One left-turn lane One through lane One right-turn lane Westbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane One through lane" One through/right-turn lane . Intersection improvements beyond current configuration. The above configuration shall be penTlitted and constructed in accordance with city, County, or State criteria, as applicable. No Certificate of OCCUpancy shall be Issued for any non- industrial developmènt of rn0n3 !t1an 1,494 residential units (9,073 daily trips), a 15O-room hotel (1,261 daily trips), 65,000 square feet of commercial (5,616 daily trips), and 30,000 square feet of office (556 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regionallrnpact until the improvements under paragraphs (a) 'and (b) above have been completed. - - - - - - - - - - - ÕÕubie õndêrITne iã fõ%: ãd.ctitioo - - - Str.LlEe T-År-eu.!'h i. for deletion ------ Existing Language i. based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-~OO Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. ( page 33 PRINT DATE: OS/18/98 .", (( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ( <5 \( : ¿7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 , "" '-' OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0227 \ 62. No building permits shall be issued tor non-industrial development ot more than 2.607 residential units (16.314 daify trips). a 250-room hotel (2,141 daily trips), 165.000 square teet ot commercial (10,289 daily trips). and 61,000 square feet of office development (974 daily trips) of the Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following improvement (development level ot thresholds may be increased if it is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that additional development can be accommodated without exceeding Level of Service 'D' peak hour. peak season, or Level of Service 'C' under average annual daily conditions): a) Eight-lane Prima Vista Boulevard from 1-95 to West Peacock Boulevard. b) Six-lane Prima Vista Boulevard from West Peacock Boulevard to Cashmere Boulevard. No Certificates ot Occupancy shall be issued tor non- industrial development ot more than 2,607 residential units (16.314 daily trips). a 25O-room hotel (2.141 daily trips). 165.000 square teet ot commercial (10,289 daily trips). and 61,000 square teet of office development (974 daily trips) ot The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the improvements under a} and b) above have been completed. 63. No building permits shafl be issued for non-lndustrial development ot more than 2.607 residential units (16,314 daily trips). a 25O-room hotel (2.141 daily trips), 165.000 square teet of commercial (10,289 daily trips). and 61,000 square teet of office development (974 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the construction of intersection improver¡¡ents to obtain the following configuration, Including -. Slgrrallzation~or sigrillliZation mcîdifieätion as warranted by ciiy; COunty or State criteria, as' applicable. a) Prima Vista and West Peacock Boulevard Northbound West Peacock Blvd. One left-turn lane" One through lane'" One right-turn lane"" Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane Second left-turn lane" One through lane Second through lane One through/righ~-tum lane Southbound West Peacock Blvd, One left-turn lane Second left-turn lane" One through lane -One right-turn lãne Westbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane" Three through lanes Fourth through lane" One right-turn lane - - - - - - - - - - - ~e UndërïIn@ is för ãdd.rtiõñ - - - St;t ilt.e 'fl\1!ðki.!JÀ is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97w023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 34 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 " ( ( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 . '?5 (( . 3 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 c \,.- ....",. ,. !~. OR BOOK J..169 PAGE 0228 ~ b) Prima Vista Boulevard and California Boulevard Northbound California Blvd. One left-turn lane Second left-turn lane" One through lane One right-turn lane Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane Second left-turn lane" Two through lanes Third through lane" One right-turn lane Southbound California Blvd. One left-turn lane One through lane One right-turn lane Westbound Prima Vista Blvd, One left-turn lane Two through lanes Third through lane" One right-turn lane. " c) Prima Vista Boulevard and Cashmere Boulevard Northbound Cashmere Blvd. One left-turn lane One through lane One right-turn lane Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane Third through lane" One right-turn lane Southbound Cashmere Blvd, One left-turn lane Second left-turn lane" e/le~ollgh làne - '" One right-turn lane . Second right-turn lane" Westbound Prima VISta Blvd. One left-tum lane Two through lanes Ttlirå through lane" One nght-tum lane .~ . y'.:," .'.," -~. d) West Midway Road and East Torino Parkway Northbound East Torino Parkwav One right-turn lane One left-turn lane" Eastbound West Midwav Road One through lane Second through lane" One right-turn lane" .. - Southbound East Torino Parkwav N/A Westbound West Midwav Road One left-turn lane" One through lane Second through lane" " Intersection improvements beyond current configuration. .-- - - - - - - - - - ñõubïeundërITneisfõ%- ãddrtiõñ - - - St~i~E~ ~~a~!k is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. page 35 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 (¡ 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ·fJ ")5 5 27 '28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 -42 (, '. \,.. ...I \ OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0229 Only required if development access exists. N/A = not applicable All above configurations shall be permitted and constructed in accordance with city, county or State criteria, as applicable. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for non- industrial development of more than 2,607 residential units (16,314 daily trips), a 250-r00m hotel (2,141 daily trips), 165,000 square feet of commercial (10,289 daily trips), and 61,000 square feet of office development (974 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the intersection improvements under (a), (b), (e), and (d) above have been completed. . 64. No building permits shall be issued for non-industrial development of more than 2,607 residential units (16,314 dally trips), a 25O-room hotel (2,141 daily trips), 165,000 square feet of commercial (10,289 daily trips), and 61,000 square feet of office development (974 daRy trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following improvement: a) Four-lane West Peacock Boulevard from University Boulevard to Prima VISta Boulevard. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for non- Industrial development of more than 2,607 residential units (16,314 daily trips), a 25O-room hotel (2,141 dany trips), 165,000 square feet of commercial (10,289 daily trips), and 61,000 square feet of office development (974 'dally trips) otrñèReservlf'Oe\lÏ!lbpínenl of Règlonal Impact until the Intersection improvements under paragraph (a) above have been completed. 65. No bUilding permits shall be Issued for Indusbial development within the Reserve Commerce Center of generating more than 8,760 Dany Trips until contracts have been let for the following improvement (development level of thresholds may be increased if it is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that additional development can be accommodated without exceeding Level of Service "0" peak hour, peak season, or Level òr Service 'C' under average annual daily conditions): a) Four-lane Glades Cut-off Road from Reserve Commerce Center (Go Team) entrance to West Midway Road. No' Certificates of ûcaJpancy shall be Issued for development within the Reserve Commerce Center generating more than 8,760 daily trips until the improvement under paragraph (a) above has been completed. . - - - - - - - - - - - ñõubleUnderïIneisfc>r ãdditiõñ - - - - - - - - - &triJt~ 'l!k~ekl..!Jh is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 36 PRINT DATE: OB/18/98 . ( ( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (;-':>5 IJ 5 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ( 66A. 66B. \,..- .....I \ OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0230 No final planned development or plat approval shaD be issued after construction of the public access road from the 1-95 interchange north through The Reserve Commerce Center connecting to Glades Cut-Off Road until contracts have been let for the construction of the following intersection improvements, including signalization as warranted by city, county, or state criteria. as applicable: a) Intersection of connector road with Reserve Boulevard Northbound connector road' Add left-turn lane' Add through lane' Add dual right-turn lanes . . Eas!b0und Reserve Boulevard Add left-turn lane Add second through lane Southbound connector road Add dualleft-t\Jm lanes Add through lane' Westbound Reserve Boulevard Add dualleft-t\Jm lanes * Add second through lane Add right-turn lane . Only required If development access south of Reselve Boulevard exists. If it does not exist, the additional improvements should be required at such time as access is available. All above configuration shall be pennitted and constructed in accordance with city, county, . or state criteria, as applicable. Gomnteh\:ing the ye-ar of CÒ11struction df the public accesll road from the 1-95 interchange north through The Reserve Commerce Center connecting to Glades Cut-otf Road, signal warrant studies shall be conducted during the peak season at the intersections identified below under a) through d). As such time as the signal warrant analysis identifies the need to install a signal(s), no building pennits shall be issued after 120 days after such determination by Sl Lucie County or FDOT as applicable until contracts have been let for the installation of the traffic signaVslgnals in accordance with City, County, or state criteria, as applicable. No certificates of oœupancy shall be issued until the traffic slgnal(s) Identified in the signäl - warrant study haslhave been installed and in operation. This. condition I\Pplies to the following intersections: a) Intersection of connector road with Glades Cut-otf Road, b) Intersection of connector road with Reserve Boulevard, c) Intersection of Prima Vista Boulevard with 1-95 Northbound Off Ramp, and, - - Doubie undërilne is för Ãd.drtiõñ - - - - - St:.t: iJEa 'Flu:SI<i!fØ. is for deletion - - -- --------- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-0:23 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 37 PRINT DATE: 08/18/96 " . (( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 67. 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 C, "5 "27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ~ OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0231 ..., d) Intersection of Prima Vista Boulevard with 1-95 Southbound Off Ramp. The signal warrant analysis is to be performed periodically as requested by SI. Lucie County but no more frequently than annually. If the connector road cannot be designed to fit within the 100 foot right-of-way due to horizontal alignment requirements, the developer shall dedicate such additional right-of-way as may be necessary to meet those design requirements. No building pennits shall be issued for development of more than 3,400 residential units (19,411 daily trips), residential units, a 25<H'oom hotel (2141 daily trips), 250,000 square feet of èommercial (13,480 daily trips), 100,000 square feet of office (1,372 dally trips), ana 1,200,000 square feet of industrial development (5524 dally trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following improvements: Four-lane Torino Parkway from East Torino Parkway to Florida's Turnpike. Interchange at Torino Parkway and Florida's Turnpike. Two-lane West Virginia Drive from Glades CUt-off Road to Cashmere Boulevard, including 1-95 Interchange. Interchange at West Virginia Drive and 1-95. Four-lane West Virginia Drive from Cashmere Boulevard to Bayshore Boulevard. 100 ....~ ..... . ." _ ~_. ~ Four-lane West Virginia Drive from Bayshore Boulevard to Alro$O Boulevard. Four-lane California Boulevard from South Peacock Boulevard to West Virginia Drive. Two-lane California Boulevard from North Peacock Boulevard to West Torino Parkway. Two-lane California Boulevard from South Peacock Boulevard to North Peacock ~ulevard, No Certificates of Oœupancy shall be Issued for development of more than 3,400 residential units (19.411 dally trips), a 250-r00m hotel (2141 dally trips), 250,000 square feet of commercial (13.480 dally trips), 100,000 square feet of office (1,372 daily trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of industrial development (5524 dally trips) of The Reserve Development of RegioÎ1allmpact until the improvements under paragraphs (a) through (I) - - - - - - - - - - - fiõubieundërITneisfoc ãdciItiõñ - - - - - - - - - Se~i1H~ T1!!I:'ekl.!B. is for deletion ß / ,Á d) y} ..' _.. fl ß ,h) )1 Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 ( Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 38 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 C: 2 3 68. 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 69. 23 24 ·C 25 ; .1C'_" "' ..7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ~. \,..- .,., .. OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0232 ~f' above have been completed. No building pennits shall be issued for development of more than 3,400 residential units (19,411 daily trips), a 250-r00m hotel, (2141 daily trips), 250,000 square feet of commercial (13,480 daily trips), 100,000 square feet of office (1,372 daily trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of industrial development (5524 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following Improvements (development level of thresholds may be increased if it is demonstrated through the traffic monitoring program that additional development can be accommodated without exceeding Level of Service "0" peak hour, peak season, or Level of Selvlce"C" under average annual dally conditions): a) Eight-lane Prima VISta Boulevard from West Peacock Boulevard to Califomla Boulevard. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for development of more than 3,400 residential units (19,411 daily trips), a 250-r00m hotel (2141 dally trips), 250,000 square feet'of commercial (13,480 daily trips), 100,000 square feet of office (1,372 dally trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of industrial development (5524 dally trips) of The -Reserve' Development of Regional Impact until the improvements under a) above has been completed. No building pennits shall be Issued for development of more than 3,400 residential units (19,411 dally trips), a 250- room hotel (2141 dally trips), 250,000 square feet of commercial (13,480 daily trips), 100,000 square feet of offioe (1,372 daßy trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of industrial development (5524 dally trips), of The Reserve Development of Regional impact until contracts have"lWecrlet for lI1ë'wiI$truction of Intersection Impro...ements to obtain the following configuration, including' signalization or signalization modification as . warranted by city, county, or State criteria, as applicable: a) Califomia Boulevard and North Peacock Boulevard Northbound California Blvd. One left-turn lane" One through/right-turn lane Eastbound North Peacock Blvd. One left-tum lane· One through/right-tum lane Southbound Califomla Blvd. Ohe left-turn lane" One through/right-turn lane Westbound North Peacock Blvd. One approach lane - - - - - - - - - - - õõu.bïl!! undëriIn;- iã för ãcklItiõñ - - - st.l!"i1Ee Threl:!!k is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 39 PRINT DATE: 08/18/9B .. ( ( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 C 25 i _7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 -40 41 42 I , '"'" ...., PAGE 0233 OR BOOK J..J..69 -. b) Prima Vista Boulevard and California Boulevard Northbound California Blvd. Two left-turn lanes One through lane Second through lane' One right-turn lane Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. Two left-turn lanes Three through lanes Fourth through lane· One right-turn lane Southbound California Blvd. One left-turn lane Two through lanes One right-turn lane Westbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane Second left-turn lane' Three through lanes Fourth through lane· One through/right-turn lane c) West Virginia Drive and Glades Cut-off Road Northbound Glades Cut-off Road One approach lane Eastbound West Viroinia Drive NIA Southbound Glades Cut-off Road One approach lane Westbound West Viroinia Drive One approach lane' d) West Virginia Drive and California Boulevard Northbound California' Boulevard One left-turn lane' One through/right-turn lane Eastbound 'w\'sst VirainiD-Dri';;; . One left-turn lane' One through lane' One right-turn lane· Southbound California Blvd. One left-turn lane' One through/right-turn lane Westbound West Viroinia Drive One left-turn lane' One through lan.e· One right-turn lane' e) West Virginia Drive and Cashmere Boulevard Northbound Cashrnere Blvd. One through/right-turn lane Eastbound West Viroinia Drive Two through lanes· One right-turn lane' - - - - - - - - - - - fiõuble undërITnë 18 tõ"r ãddItiõñ - - - Sts~i1Ee. 'PRr'el:l.!fA is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97~023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 40 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 (( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9' 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 r. "'5 . ~ ( ; 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ( '. ~ ...,,¡I \ OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0234 Southbound Cashmere Blvd. Tvvoleft-tumlanes" One through/right-tum lane Westbound West Viroinia Drive One left-tum lane" Tvvo through lanes' One right-tum lane" f) West Virginia Drive and Airoso Boulevard Northbound Airoso Boulevard One approach lane Eastbound West Virainia Drive One left-tum lane" Tvvo through lanes" One right-tum lane" . Southbound Airoso Blvd. One approach lane Westbound West Virainia Drive One left-tum lane" Tvvo through lanes" One right-tum lane" g) West Virginia Drive and Bayshore Boulevard Northbound Bavshore Blvd. One left-tum lane' One through/right-tum lane Eastbound West Virainla Drive One left-tum lane" Tvvo through lanes' One right-tum lane" Southbound Bavshore Blvd. One·teft-tDm lane' One through/right turn lane Westbound West Viralnla Drive . 'One left-tunrfane' .. Tvvo through lanes" One right-turn lane" h} West Torino Parkvvay and Torino Parkvvay Northbound West Torino Parkvvav One approach lane Eastbound Torino Parkvvav . NfA Southbound West Torino Parkvvav One left-turn lane" One through lane Westbound Torino Parkvvav One approach lane " Intersection Improvements beyond current configuration. NfA = not applicable -------- - - - ~~leUn~rrrnei8f~~drrioo - - -- Stl!'Ì:he. 'Ph!"ð'tl.!A is for deletion - - - - .- Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. page 41 PRINT DATE: oe/1s/98 .. -. ( ( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9' 10 11 70. 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 71. 20 21 22 72. 23 24 ((?5 ..' .'" ¿J 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 3'9 40 41 42 "'" ...., OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0235 All above configurations shall be pennitted and constructed in accordance with city, county, or state criteria, as applicable. No Certificates of Occupancy shall be issued for development of more than 3,400 residential units (19,411 daily trips), a 250-room hotel (2141 daily trips), 250,000 square feet of commercial (13,480 daily trips), 100,000 square feet of office (1,372 daily trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of industrial development (5524 daily trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the intersection improvements under paragraphs (a) through (h) above, have been completed. . All project entrance Intersection configurations shall maintain Council's objective level of service standards. All project entrance intersectionconfigurâtions, including any Florida East Coast Railway crossings at Glades Cut-off Road/Reserve Boulevard and at Glades Cut-off RoadlReserve Commerce Center (Go Team) entrance, shall be approved as appropriate by . the City of Port Sl Lucie, Sl Lucie County, RorIda Deparbnent of Transportation. and the Rorida East Coast RaDway. A copy of approved project entrance Intersection configuration shall be provided to Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council. As a minimum, the Developer shall pay a talr share contribution consistent with the road Impact fee ordinance of Sl Lucie County. Intersection Improvements identified In paragraph (a) below shall be constructed conCurrent with the southerly connection of Cashmere Boulevard to Prima Vista Boulevard. a) Prima Vista Boulevard and Cashmere Boulevard '. Northbound Cashmere Blvd. One left-turn lane" One right-turn lane" Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. Two through lanes One right-turn lane" Southbound Cashmere Blvd. N/A Westbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane" Two through lanes " Improvements beyond current configuration. N/A = not applicable No further building pennits tor non-industrial development shall be issued in The Reserve after the southerly connection of Cashmere Boulevard to Prima Vista Boulevard is open to traffic until the Improvements under paragraph (a) above have been completed. - - - - - - - - - - - ñõuhie underïIne is fm- ãddItiõñ - - - S'el!ih~ Tk!!e~!k is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 ( Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 42 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 '. ( ( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 '~5 -c . .. I 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ( \ , 74. '- .."" OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0236 73. No building permits shall be issued for development of more than 3,400 residential units (19,411 daily trips), a 250- room hotel (2141 daily trips), 250,000 square feet of commercial (13,480 daily trips), 100,000 square feet of office (1.372 daily trips), and 1,200,000 square feet of industrial development (5524 datly trips) of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until contracts have been let for the following improvements: a) Prima Vista Boulevard and Califomia Boulevard Northbound California Blvd. One left-turn lane' One through lane' One right-turn lane' Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane' Two through lanes One right-turn lane' Southbound California Blvd. One left-turn lane' One through lane' One right-tum lane' Westbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane' Two through lanes One right-turn lane' , Improvements beyond current configuration. No Certificates of· Occupancy shall be issued for any non- industrial development'of rnore than 3,400 residential unItS (19,411 dally hips), a 25O-room hotel (2141 daily hips), 250,000 square feet of commercial (13,480 daUy hips), 100,000 square feet of office (1,372 daUy hips), and 1,200,000 square feet of Indusbial development (5524 dally hips), of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact until the improvements under paragraph (a) above have been completed, ." _.' _.' .. "" Intersection improvements ldentifiE!(j in a) below shall be constructed concurrent with the northerty connection of Cashmere Boulevard to Prima VISta Boulevard. a) Prima Vista Boulevard and Cashmere Boulevard Northbound Cashmere Blvd. One left-turn lane One through lane' One right-turn lane Eastbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane' Two through lanes One right-turn I!!;ne Southbound Cashmere Blvd. One left-turn lane One through lane One right-tl,lm lane' Westbound Prima Vista Blvd. One left-turn lane Two through lanes One right-turn lane - - - - - - - - - - - ÕÕubÏe Und@rÜne is får ãdd.Itiõñ - - - SeJ::i.he. Th.t:8k:t.!ft. is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 96-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 43 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 . ( ( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 C· '?5 ( ; :1.7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 . . ......-. ..... PAGE 02.=:.7 ...., OR BOOK J..169 * Improvements beyond current configuration. No further building permits for non-industrial development shall be issued in The Reserve after the northerly connection of Cashmere Boulevard to Prima Vista Boulevard is open to traffic until the improvements under a) above have been completed. 75. Commencing in January of 1990, the Developer may undertake an bi-annual monitoring program. The traffic monnoring program shall be conducted by a traffic engineering finn that is qualified by the Rorida Oeparlment ofTransportation in F(3.05), Traffic Operation Studies, and G(3.06), Traffic Operation Design, or an equivalenl . If the monitoring program is selected, it must be commenced in January, 1989 arid maintained on an annual basis. The developer shall submit to the County a traffic monitoring report along with The Reserve's Annual Development Report. The report shall present existing counts and traffic conditions, including all analysis, specifying any improvements necessary to provide Level of Service ·C· for annual average daily traffic conditions and Level of Service ·0· for peak season peak hour conditions. The report will Identify any exceedance and construction dates as defined herein. Monitoring of each roadway segment listed in Tables I and II may be discontinued when all related improvements to that roadway segment have been completed. The monitoring program for all roadway links shall end at the completion of the Reserve's development (Year 2008). The report will be submitted to all agencies which receive the annual report. The' City of Port Sl Lucie, Sl Lucie County and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council shall review and approve the monitoring report and Its findings. The program may monitor any or all tjf theYOadway link!; listed In Tables "and It A two-day, mid-week, twenty-four hour (hourly recording) count shall be made on each link. Commencing in January of 1991, the monitoring program will project traffic demands for each link using historical traffic growth data from the monitoring program and considering projected development within The Reserve. Forecasts will be made for a three-year period. When a link is projected to exceed Its existing service volume for Level of Service ·C· or ·0* during the three-year period, the month and year for such exceedance will be esJimated- (exceedance date). a. Building pennits for non-industrial development in ex~ss of the levels shown In Table I may be issued for The Reserve if it is shown in the Traffic Monitoring Program that Level of Service ·C· for annual average daily traffic and Level of Service ·0" for peak season,. peak hour traffic can be maintained with additional Reserve development. When an exceedance date is detennined, building pennits for development shall not - - - - - - - - - - - D"oubie Un(j;rnn;"" iã fõ'r ãdð.rtiõñ - - - £t:.f'iJEe Thral;i!'fl. is for deletion ------ Existing Language is based on Resolution 97~023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 44 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 '. c( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 .(( ~5 76. ; L.7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 """' ...,.¡ OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0238 be issued after the construction date until the needed improvement is let for construction. The construction date is defined as twelve (12) months prior to the exceedance date for roadway improvements and eighteen (18) months prior to the exceedance date for bridge improvements. Design and pennitting of these improvements must be completed by the construction date. When an exceedance date is detennined, Certificates of Occupancy shall not be issued after the exceedance date until the improvement is complete. b. Building permits for indusbial development in excess of the levels shown in Table II may be issued for The Reserve if it Is shown in the Traffic Monitoring Program that Level of Service ·C· for annual average daily traffic and Level of Service "0. for peåk season, peak hour traffic can be maintained with additional Reserve development. When an exceedance date is detennined, building permits for development shall not be issued after the construction date unbl the needed improvement is let for construction. The construction date is defined as twelve (12) months prior to the exceedance date for roadway improvements and eighteen (18) months prior to the exceedance date for bridge improvements. Design and pennitting of these improvements must be completed by the construction date. . When an exceedance date is detennined, Certificates of Occupancy shall not be issued after the exceedance date until the Improvement is complete. Commencing In January, 1990, the developer may undertake an annual monitoring program of the 1:95iPrima VIsta Boulevard ·interchange. The traffi" monitoring' program -shall be" conducted by a traffic engineering finn that Is qualified by FOOT in F(3.05) - Traffic Operation Studies and G(3.06) - Traffic Operation Design or an equivalent. If the monitoring program is selected, it must be commenced in January, 1990 and maintained on an annual basis. The developer shall submit to the City of Port St. Lucie, SI. Lucie County and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council a traffic monitoring report along with The Reserve's Annual Development Report. The report shall present øxlsting- counts and traffic conditions, including all analysis, specifying any improvements necessary to provide Level of Service .C" for annual average daUy traffic conditions and Level of Service ·0· for peak season peak hour conditions. The report will identify any exceedance ¡md construction dates as defined herein. This monitoring program shall include AM and PM peak hour tuming'movement counts for one hundred twenty (120) minutes to capture the maximum sixty minutes at both interchange exit ramp intersections. - - - - - - - - - - - ÕÕuhleundërITneisfõr ãddrtiõñ - - - - - - - - - &I:ril[e. 'flo!rstl.gfl. is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-~OO Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. Page 4S PRINT DATE: 08/18/96 ,. '. ( ( I 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 I 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 " '- ....., OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0239 Commencing two years from the opening of the interchange, the monitoring program will project traffic demands for each tuming movement using the historical traffic growth data from the monitoring program and considering projected development with The Reserve. Forecasts will be made for a three-year period. Critical movement capacity analysis of these intersections shall be performed using the projected AM and PM traffic volumes. The analysis shall be based 'upon criteria relating to operation and design as set forth in Transportation Research Circular No. 212, "Interim Materials on Highway Capacity; January, 1980. When either intersection is projected to exceed ils capacity for level of Service "C" or "D" during the three-year period, the month and year for such exceedance will be estimated ( exceedance date). . (TEXTOF THIS CONDIT/ON IS CONTINUED ON PAGE 46) , " . - - - - - - - - - - - õõubït!:ün~rrrnëiŠ-fõr ãadItiõñ - - - - - - - - - S'e!::ihe 'Pk.t!ðl:l.!k is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6th Amendment to D.O. page 46 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 :. """ OR BOOK J..J.. 6 9 """" PAGE 0240 (( .b " '" <> ;;; ;;; ~ ;;; <> s~ <> <> <> ... ~ ~ "" ~ '" ~ :2 .; .; ~ .; .,; N N ~ ... ~~ <> 8 ~ ~ ~ & & <> ;¡; ;¡; § ;¡; ò '" '" .b~ ::! '" '" '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ J~ ::J ::J ::J ::J ::J ~ <> ~ & ~ d 8 & 'B .; !i! !2 <> '" :s (!. '" ~ ~ ... 'ii J~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ ¡¡¡ <> ~ on on ~ "¡¡ ... ... ij §') <> <> <> <> <> :!! ~ on ~ ~ ~ ... J ... ... ... ... ... 'ii .... .... .... .... .... ." c u C 'O~ 11; S § 8 S 11; !~ "" ~ .... ~ "" '0c-i ... ~~. Ñ ." I 11 '0 J! N I::: '0 -g J! ... ... ... ... ... ... 2 '" N ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .... · J! ¡¡; ... ~ .,; ::I Õ J! ~ t '0 - 1"1 > ~ 1/ : '" ;¡¡-- ~ '" ¡¡; ii .,; .,; .,; '" .¡: .!I 1< ~ ¡ -g > > . "¡¡ u ~ ¡¡; ¡¡; ¡¡; > ~ ~ 6 '" Õ ¡¡; ., ., u . N J! N Ë Ë g e u .. 0 ª ~ .c ií t; .c ~ ~ ~ ð ð a . ~ '" '0 · J! ! I::: '" 2 . '" J! . N .. -g -g , J! . ¡¡ u Ë · : ¡¡; ¡¡; .,; -g J u N ~ '" .¡: -" -" > ... N ~ U g ¡¡; ¡¡; 3: õ "¡¡ .¡; 0 0 ., 0 u u . e N . 'Ë u u u .. .. ª E ~ ... '" t; ~ .c 3: 3: ~ ;¡ ~ u u >- I::: . '? .Ë "E ~ ;; J J '0 U > . ;¡¡ > . N U - '" .g~ E";; . N 'C 0 U 0 -" 0 ., , ..'" ¡¡,'" 0'" · . ( ( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1.0 1.1. 1.2 1.3 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.7 1.8 1.9 77. 20 21. 22 23 24 C 15 ¿] 28 29 30 31. 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41. """ ..." \ OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0241 Building permits for non-industrial development in excess of 1,494 residential units (9,073 daily trips), a 150-room hotel (1,261 daily trips), 65,000 square feet of commercial (5,616 daily trips), and 30,000 square feet of office (556 daily trips) of office may be issued for The Reserve if it is shown in the Traffic Monitoring Program that Level of Service "C" for annual average daily traffic and Level of Service "0" for peak season, peak hour traffic can be maintained with additional Reserve development When an exceedance date is detennined, building pennits shall not be issued after the construction date until the needed improvement is let for construction. The construction date is defined as eighteen (18) months prior to the exceedance date for bridge improvements. Design and penTlitiing of these improvements must be completed by the construction date. . a. Addition of a two-/ane parallel structure. b. Northbound right-turn lane. c. Southbound right-tum lane. d. Second southbound left-tum lane.When an exceedance date is detennined, Certificate of Occupancy shall not be issued after the exceedance date until the improvement is complete. No final planned development or plat approval shall be issued for phase IV unless a traffic study has been conducted by the Developer, submitted to and approved by the City of Port St. Lucie, St. Lucie County, Florida Department of Transportation, and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, which demonstrates that the regional roadway network can accommodate a specified amount of additional Reserve Development of Reg[onallmpact generated traffic and growth in background traffic beyond 2005 and can still be maintained at Level of Service "C" during average annual daily traffic conditions and Level of Service "0" dUring peak hour, peak seasôfi conditionS':'SuèiT Study may bé requested by St. LUcie County prior to phase IV, but after January 1, 1995. The traffic study shall: a) identify the improvements and timing of those improvements necessary to provide Level of Service "C" under average annual daily operating conditions and Level of Service "0" under peak hour, peak season operating conditions for the subject transportation network dUring the projected completion of the project, including project impacts and growth in background traffic. '- Additional final planned development or plat shall not be issued unttl a new project phasing program and rOfldway improvement program necessary to maintain acceptable levels of service have been approved by the City of Port SI. Lucie..SI. Lucie County, Florida Department of Transportation, and Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council for the remainder of the development. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition E:è.riIEe. ~kfe¡,¡!,k is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D.O. \ Page 48 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 .,' ~ (, . '. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 C -0:: 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 . ' . "'"' .." OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0242 HOUSING 78. Prior to application for building permits for any hotel, commercial, industrial, or residential development in The Reserve Development of Regional Impact beyond that authorized in the Preliminary Development Agreement, the developer shall provide an estimate of the number of permanent jobs that will be created within the project boundaries at buildout and dUring occupancy of each project phase. This estimate of total permanent employment generated shall be broken down by salary range and compared with the affordabDity of residential units which have been or will be constructed prior to buildout of that phase or previous phases under review. In addition, the developer shall conduct a housing study to determine the minimum distance from The Reserve Development of Regional Impact where an adequale supply of housing which is affordable to all persons worIdng in The Reserve Development of Regional Impact is located. This housing study will examine the location and costs of this housing and will Include a plan for the provision of affordable housing should there not be enough supply in the vicinity. The developer may create more permanent employment than housing opportunities for employees, but shall not construct any housing which is not affordable to employees of businesses within the project boundaries until such time as affordable housing opportunities in the vicinity of The Reserve Development of Regional Impact have been provided for all employment created In that phase of development Consistency of development plans with this intent must be determined by the City of Port St. Lucie, Sl Lucie County, and the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council prior to the issuance of buDding permits for any development beyond that authorized by the Preliminary Development Agreement. -'- -.,,-. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of Sl lucie County, Rorida, as follows: B. The legal description for the property under this amended Development of Regional Impact Application for Development Approval, is as follows: SEE ATTACHED EXHIBIT A C. Any modl1icatlonsor deviationsJrom tha approved plans or requirements of this Development Order shall be submitted to the Sl Lucie County Community Development Director and the Port Sl lucie City Planner, as appropriate, for a determination by the Board of CQunty Commissioners of Sl Lucie County/City Council of the City of Port St. Lucie, as to whether the change constitutes a substantial deviation as provided In Section 380.06(19), Florida Statutes. The Board of Commissioners of St. Lucie. County/City Council of. the City of Port St. Lucie, as appropriate, shall make Its determination - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition St;.I!iJEe t:kl!8lotgh is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D.O. Page 49 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 " " (( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ('. ~5 ( ; -¿7 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 'i '-'" ., OR BOOK ll69 PAGE 0243 of substantial deviation at a public hearing after notice to the developer. D. SI. Lucie County/the City of Port SI. Lucie shall monitor the development of the project to ensure compliance with this Development Order. The SI. Lucie County Community Development Director and/or the City of Port SI. Lucie City Planner, as appropriate, shall be the local official assigned the responsibility for monitoring the development and enforcing the tenns of the Development Order. The Community Development Director/City Planner may require periodic reports of the developer with regard to any Item set forth in this Development Order. E. The developer shall make an annual report as required by Section 380.06(18), Rorida Statutes. The annual report shall be submitted each year on the anniversa¡y date of the adoption, of Resolution 89- 73, or the earlier date if two separate orders are adopted, of this amended Development Òrder and shall include the following; 1. Any changes in the plan of development, or in the representations contained in the . Application for Development Approval, or in the phasing for the reporting year and for the next year; 2. A summary comparison of development activity proposed and actually conducted for the year; 3. Undeveloped tracts of land that have been sold, transferred, or leased to a successor developer; 4. Identification and intended use of lands purchased, leased, or optioned by the developer aðjacent to the original site since the Dëvèlopment Or'ëler was issued; 5. An assessment of the developer'S and local government's compliance with the conditions of. approval contained in thÎs Development Order and the commitments specified in the Application for Development Approval and summarized in the Regional Pianning Council Assessment Report for the development.undertaken; 6. Any request for a .substantial deviation determination that was filed in the reporting year or is anticipated to be filed during the next yea,r; 7; An indication of a change, if any, in local govemment iL/risdlction for any portion of the development since the Development Order was issued; 8. A list of significant local, State, and federal permits which have been obtained or which are pending by agency, type of permit, permit number, and purpose of each; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition ~Er'ihe. Uu:e.Ii!k is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D.O. Page SO PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 . . .' " .' ( ( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 F. 16 17 '18 G. 19 20 21 22 23 24 ( "5 H. .' \ ,¿7 28 29 30 31 32 I. 33 34 35 36 J. 37 38 39 40 41 K. '-'" ...¡ OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0244 9. The annual report shall be transmitted to SI. Lucie County, the City of Port SI. Lucie, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, the Aorida Department of Community Affairs. the Florida Department of Natural Resources, the South Florida Water Management District, the Florida Department of Environmental Regulation, and such additional parties as may be appropriate or required by law; 10. A copy of any recorded notice of the adoption of a Development Order or the subsequent modification of an adopted Development Order that was recorded by the developer pursuant to Subsection 380.06(15), Florida Statutes; and 11. Any other infonnation requested by the Board of Commissioners of SI. Lucie County/City Council of the City of Port Sl Lucie or the SI. Lucie County Community Development Director/Port SI. Lucie City Planner to be included in the annual report. The definitions found in Chapter 380, Florida statutes, shall apply to this amended Development Order. SI. Lucie County hereby agrees that prior to March 14, 2009 The Reserve Development of Regional Impact shall not be subject to down zoning, unIt density reduction, or intensity reduction, unless the County/City, as appropriate, demonstrateS that substantial changes in the conditions underlying the approval of the amended Development Order have occurred, or that the amended Development Order was based on substantially inaccurate infonnation provided by the developer, or that the change is clearly established by SI. Lucie Countylthe City of Port SI. Lucie to be essential to the public health, safety, or welfare. . This amended Development Otder"Shall be b/ndlngupön the devélöþer and its assignees or successors in intereSl. It is understood that any reference herein to any governmental agency shall be construed to mean any future Instrumentafity which may be created and designated as successor In interest to, or which otherwise possesses any of the powers and duties· of any referenced government agency inexistence on the effective date of this amended Development Order. The approval granted by thIs amended 'Development Order is conditional and shall not be construed to obviate the duty of the developer to comply with all other applicable local, state, andfederal pennitting requirements. . In the event that any portion or se<;tion of this amE l1ded Development Order is deemed to be Invalid, Illegal, or unconstitutional by a court of competent jurisdIction, such decision shall in no. manner affect the remaining portions or sections of this amended Development Order, which shall'remaln in full force and effect. . This amended Development Order shall become effectlv:e up~n adoption. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition Gh i.he. Eat! tnigh is for deletion - -- - - - - - - - - - - - Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D.O. Page 51 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 .., '. c( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 . 25 G6'- 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 l ~ ....... ..J OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0245 l. Certified copies of this amended Development Order shall be transmitted immediately by certified maii to the Department of Community Affairs, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Councii, and Reserv Ho e L d. L P Dei w re Limit P rtne . he ucce or in . t rest to Callaw Land and Cattle Comoanv Calla..ay LaRd 8f1d Gettle Gomp8RY. M. Within 21 days of the effective date of this resolution amending Resolution No. 89-73, the developer, shall record a notice of adoption of this order'in compliance with Chapter 380.06(15}{f}, Florida Statutes, with copies of said notice being provided to the ROOda Department. of Community Affairs, Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council, Sf. Lucie County and the City of Port Sf. Lucie. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chainnan Gary D. Charles, Sr. AYE Vice-Chainnan Paula Lewis AYE Commissioner Cliff Barnes AYE Commissioner John D. Bruhn AYE Commissioner Ken Sattler AYE PASS~~.AND DULY ADOP~E!? tII!~ 18th day of August, 1998. r; .r::· ._....:~-; "~. - .;~. ;.~..' - .. ., ...... ".._'.~-r. .---: ~~~"f 98-100(resvdo) DJMI . - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JePUty Clerk 9 /7~ØP- - Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D.O. Page S2 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 ~ ~ '. (( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 '19 20 21 22 .23 (( . , .> 26 27 28 29 30 31 .32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 " \,,;' W' ...J OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0246 EXHIBIT A LEGAL DESCRIPTION This Description Does Not Depict Lines of Ownership A Parcel of Land Lying in Sections 14, IS, 16, 21, 22, 23, 26, 27, 28, 34 And 35, Township 36 South, Range 39 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, More particulary . Described as Follows: Begin at the Southwest Corner of Said Section 15; Thence South 890 23' 26" East, along the South Line of Said Section 15, a Distance of 812.97 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Westerly Line of a Parcel of Land Described in Official Records Book 514, Pages 237-239, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; Thence North 44° 46'07" East, along the Westerly Line of Said Parcel of Land, a Distance of 1393.92 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Westerly Line of the Plat of G. O. Team Industrial Park - Unit One, as Recorded in Plat Book 23, Page 31, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; Thence Northeasterly along the Westerly Line of Said Plat of G. O. Team Industrial Park Unit One the Following Courses and Distances: North 45° 13'33" West, 660.03 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the ¡¡:asterJ.:,r. Right-of-way Line of. t.\1e Flm:Jda Rast.. Coa.st Rai..lway;.. Thence North 44° 45' 58" East along Said Easterly Right-of-way Line, a Distance of 120.00 Feet; Thence South 45° 13'53" East, 510.04 Feet; Thence South 63° 39' 59" East, 158.11 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Easterly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement as Recorded in Deed Book 198, Page 1040, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. " Thence South 44° 45' 58" West, along Said Westerly Line of Said Plat of G. O. Team Industrial Park - Unit One and its Northerly Prolongation and the Easterly Line of Said Florida Power and Light Easement, a Distance of 4001.62 Feet; Thence South 89° 29' 01" East, a Distance of 574.47 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the East Line of Said Section IS, Being the Westerly Line of the Plat of Port St. Lucie Section Forty Four, as R~corded in Plat Book 16, Page 23, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; Thence South 89° 29'01" East, along the Northerly Line of Said Plat of Port St. Lucie Section Forty Four, a Distance of 112.97 Feet to the Westerly Line of .a Florida Power and Light Easement as - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition Cerihe 1;Jn~al:l.!à. is for deletion Existing Language is baaed on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 96-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D.O. Page 53 PRINT DATE: Oe/18/98 ·~ '- .- / (( 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 H 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 0 :J5 ç ¿7 28 29 30 31 32 33 ;34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 ( ~ ...", OR BOOK J..169 PAGE 0247 Recorded in O:!:ficial Records Book 90, Page 71, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; Thence South 00° 21' 26' West, along the Westerly Line of Said Florida Power and Light Easement, a Distance of 3975.26 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the North Line of Said Section 23; Thence North 890 23'16- East, along Said North Line of Section 23, a Distance of 33.09 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Westerly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement, Recorded in Official Records Book 97, Page 504, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; Thence South 00° 00'15" West, along the Westerly Line of Said Florida Power and Light Easement, a Distance of 5305.53 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the North Line of Said Section 26; Thence South 000 00'02" East along the Westerly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement Recorded in Official Records Book 120, Page 199, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida, a Distance of 2,898.15 to the Point of Intersection with the Proposed Westerly Right-of-way Line of the Proposed 1-95 Interchange; Thence Southerly along Said Proposed Right-of-way the Following Courses and Distances; Afore Said Point Being a Point in a CUrve Concave to the Northwest to Which a Radial Line Bears South 47° 50' 57" East with a Radius of 600.50 Feet; Thence Southwesterly along the Arc of Said CUrve; a Distance of 176.71 Feet, Through a C~ntral Angle of 160 15'37"; Thence South 59° 00' 40" West, 462.08 Feet to a Point of CUrvature of a Curve Concave to the Southeast, Having a Radius of 621.42 Feet; Thence Southwesterly along the Arc of Said CUrve, a Distance of 416.77 Feet Through a Central Angle of 38° 25" 38"; Thence South.200 35'02" West, 532.11 Feet to a Point of Curvature of a Curve Concave to "the Northwest, Having a Radius of 131.00 Feet, ThéIide Southwesterly along the Arc of Said Çurve 149.35 Feèt, Through a Central Angle of 65° 19'11"; Thence South 85 54'13 "West, 388.39 . Feet; Thence South 05° 58'06" East, 64.11 Feet; Thence South 890 54'13" West, 300.01 Feet; Thence South 00 05'47" East, 140.00 South 05 46'23" West, 64.11 Feet; Thence South 86 05'47" East, 960.95 Feet to a Point. of CUrvature of a CUrve Concave to the Southwest Having a Radius of 600.50 Feet; Thence Southeasterly along the Arc o~ Sai~ Curve a Distance of 626.00 Feet Through a Central Angle of'590 43' 45", to a Point <:if Compound Curvature of a Curve Concave to the Southwest, Having a Radius of 1295.00 Feet; Thence Sòutheasterly along the Arc of Said CUrve, a Distance of 60.40 Feet Througþ a Central Angle of 02° 39'23" to the Point of Intersection with· the Westerly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement Recorded in Official Records Book 97, Page 504, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition £E!I!iJEI~. '=.hretl!h is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D.O. Page S4 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 " ( ( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 ( <6 .( .... -~ 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 "" -J OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0248 Thence South 00 00'02- East, along the Westerly Line of Said Florida Power and Light Easement, a Distance of 411.27 Feet; Thence along the Westerly Line of a Florida Power and Light Easement Recorded in Official Record Book 468, Page 2897, the Following Courses and Distances: Thence South 00 35'29" East, 1849.11 Feet; Thence South 060 37'22" West, 631.95 Feet; Thence South 12° 26'07" West, 640.99 Feet; Thence South 19° 28'36" West, 683.65 Feet; Thence South 790 27'56" West, 55.51 Feet; Thence South 10° 32'03" East, 50.00 Feet; Thence North 79° 27' 56" East, 55.39 Feet; Thence South 40° 32'32" East, 168.87 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Westerly Right-of-w~ Line of State Road No.9 (I-95); . Thence South 23° 34 44" West, along Said westerly Right-of-"Way, Line of State Road No.9 (I-95), a Distance of 676.24 Feet; Thence South 89" 50'59" West, 902.32 Feet; Thence North 43" 08' 26" West, 1,710.03 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the Easterly Line of a Parcel of Land Described in Official Records Book 247, Page 664, Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida; Thence North 61° 23'48" East, along Said Easterly Lin~ Of. Said Parcel, a Distance of 683.12 Feet; Thence North 54" 08' 26" West, along the Northerly Line of Said Parcel, a Distance of 1136.31 Feet; Thence South 610 Sl' 34" West, along the Westerly Line of Said Parcel, a Distance of 1535.64 Feet; Thence South 40 58'54" West along the Westerly Line of Said Parcel, a Distange of 959.07 Feet to Point of Intersection with the Northeasterly' Right-of-way Line of the South Florida Water Management District Canal No. C-24; Thence North 43° 08'26" West, along the Northeasterly Right-of-way Line of Said South Florida Water Management District ""'Canal No.....C~24, a Distance of' 10,173.69 Feet; Thtimce Nort:i,''¡6" 44' 3'7~ Zast, 1261.19 Feet; Thence North 43" 08' 40" West, Paral).el with the Northeasterly Right-of-way Line of Said South Florida Water Management District Canal No. C-24, a Distance of 5082.07 Feet; Thence North 43 34' 09" West, Parallel with Said Northeasterly Right-of-way of Said South Florida Water Management District Canal No. C-24 , a Distance of 5340.47 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the' Easterly Right-of-way Line of the Florida East Coast Railway; Thence North 44" 45' 58" East, along the Easterly Right-of-way Line of the Florida East. Coast Railway, a Distance of 8,141.46 Feet to the Point of Intersection With. Th~West Line of Said' Section 15; Thence South ·00" 36' 34" West, along the West Line of Said Section 15, a Distance of 110.12 Feet to the Point of Intersection with the South Line of Said Section 15 and the Point of Beginning. Containing 2,690 Acres More or Less. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition £tr-ihe Ek~81;1.!'h is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D.O. Page SS PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 " .-.... " C 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 (! , j 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 (, "" -."tJ/Í OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0249 EXHIBIT B SANDHILL CRANE NESTING MANAGEMENT PLAN The developer shall preserve two areas that provide potential nesting habitat for Sandhill Cranes. These areas are depicted on Map H. Other areas maybe defined by the developer as Sandhill Crane nesting sites, including areaS designated as mitigation or restoration areas, to retlectdocumcnted nesting activity or ftcquency ofuse with the approval of the Florida Game and Fresh Water Fish Commission. Wetlands providing nesting site habitat shaIl meet the following criteria: · Located within 1/2 mile of a known nest site. · Mïn;mnm wetland depressional radius of 100 feet with ordinary high water elevations of2-3 fee~ ordinary low water elevations of 0.5-2 feet and domin.ted by wet1and grasses and forbs (little or no woody vegetation) · M;n;mnm managed upland perimeter buffet of 100 feet from jurisdictional wetland limits, managed as open native wetland transition or uplands' foraging habitat - This area shall have no more than 20% shrubby understory 3.0 feet or less in heigh~ no forest canopy, and characterized by grassy ground cover. . A visual screen of native vegetation, planted or naturally OCCUIring, at least 5 feet in height and at least 20 feet in width to providM v'$'!~I.barri~ tt' SUIl'Ounding hUIll3I\ diotlltb= ¡"dud'11g r~.s.i.d""tilÙ honem.... "- -..- · Where golf course fairways or lakes are adjacent to the nest site wetland, the managed upland perimeter may be reduced to 50 feet in width and the visual screen eliminated provided the width of the fairway or lake is at least 150 feet The upland perimeters and buffers may be modified as appropriate to accommodate landscape design or sound environmental planning, so long as the proposed plan will not significantly reduce the area of the wetlancH1csting depressional, transitional wetland, or upland foraging habitat; and so long as no constIUction OccuIs Within 300 (eet of the designated "center" of the proposed nesting site. Management of the non-golf course portions of the buffers and wctIands shall be pursuant to recommendations developed in consultation with the Florida Game and Fresh Water - . Fish Commission. During the months ofDeccmber I, to April 30, no constIUction within 300 feet ofprescrved or restored wetland shall occur until the wetland has been surveyed for Sandhill Crane nests. In the event that active nests are found, constIUction shall not occur nntil Iuly or 90 days after the eggs hatch whichever comes first - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - . - - - - . - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition E:~l!'ihe tRrel:l§R is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D.O. page 56 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 --. ..;,-....-- " '.' ......~ C( 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 (( '9 .. ¿l 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 '-' ~ OR BOOK :1..169 PAGE 0250 EXHIBIT H MASTER PLAN FOR THE RESERVE (LARGE SCALE MAPS ON FILE WITH ST. LUCIE COUNTY COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT) - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined is for addition Cl:ri fe. ~h.l!8Lj~ is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D.O. Page 57 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 ~ I 1. 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 (( ":; 5' 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 r-"'::'"""".1", '-' '. OR BOOK 1169 PAGE 0251 ...".J 4 m ¡-;;- - ï ~ ~ .--- .---. ""-- 0- G:I --.....- ... .. " MASTER PlAN ':.:' - rue RESERVE ~w_ _...a.H -- -- ...~....hOC =---=--..::..= E.::::::::3-=...- S::-=----:::- -....:T__._ ~-..c"~1'<. . MAP 'H' -=- ~-=- - - - - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - -"- - - .".- '- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Double Underlined.:is for addition £tE"i E7. tlu~ld.!h is for deletion Existing Language is based on Resolution 97-023 Resolution 98-100 Final - 6h Amendment to D.O. Page 58 PRINT DATE: 08/18/98 - """ 'W/ (Ç<þ 10/28/03 ... Agenda Request Item Number: Meetlna Date: Consent Regular Public Hearing leg. ] [ ] [XI [ I Quasi-J [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development ment Director SUBJECT: Consider approval of the Northeastern SI. lucle County Greenways and Trails Conceptual Plan and direct staff to incorporate the Plan into the County's adopted Greenways, Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. BACKGROUND: On Saturday, May 31,2003, a community workshop was held at the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute to identify potential greenway and trail locations in northeastern SI. Lucie County. The Northeastern SI. Lucie County Greenways and Trails Conceptual Plan proposes a fully Interconnected greenway and trail system that compliments and furthers the County's 2001 adopted Greenways, Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A On January 12,1994 this Board, through Resolution No. 94-126, recognized the Indian River lagoon Greenway. RECOMMENDATION: On July 21, 2001, this Board, through the adoption of Resolution No. 01· 123, adopted and provided for the refinement of the "Greenways, Trails and Bikeways Preliminary Master Plan". Approve the Northeastern SI. Lucie County Greenways and Trails Conceptual Plan and direct staff to incorporate the Plan into the 2001 adopted Greenways, Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. COMMISSION ACTION: i!=J APPROVED D DENIED D OTHER CONCURRENCE: Approved (4-0) Bruhn-Absent Coordination! Signatures County Attorney Finance.: Environ. Resources; Mgl. & Budget: Fire Dept: Utility: Purchasing: Public Works: Other: ~ ~ o « tr.. ~ 01 _ ! ~ ê ~" .~ ¡,¿j -E -< (¡j 1:1 ~ 1i~ III III 1§"'"j ~ 6;¡¡9J~"'ï:d·a~...~ ~ :ã'~Š.ê~·~t!cr,] è< ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "8 .~ ~ 1î~~"I~ "-cf;.o :¡¡ J ðn,Õ'~ C> ~ <J1' ~ ~1.:J ., ",.~ 1 '0 1 ~ 8. ~ "!J 1 i II h 2 ! ! t £ ! U¡ }ðið~ïìIDDa~~D I ~ '0, o E . ~~:d ~ 5 . " " ö ~. ~ ~. é ;::.. 1\1 ':8 'õ ~ 'OJ '.. ]~H ~Q.;1:-:5 ~'Q1 '< §.§"'J .g ~~~.g ~{ . c H c , § ~ ê.. '.1:1""''1> r! ~'È ~~' ~ 1; ¡ ~ 8 ~~ ,,- , ~~~ q .6 ~Q ~"'ijiii , >~ .::¡~õ ~~~ ~"a~ (JsaM aron1 'JS) apn1 'IS pOd JO ÁJr:; ~ ~ ¡:: '=S\'-<'<>;¡~ oS <>;¡ ;::;-- >-1.;-:-' e-¡::-. ~ ,.-...... ~ ~:.s >Ei-2:<>;¡:E1 ~;qU)::::::.E <tJ~ Il.~'<; In: III; IlIi I ~ " 8 . 0° ~ ~ ~tJ "'''' 0.. Z~ " ] .¡;¡ '" ~ ~ ~ .:¡ ..., Pi: ~ t 1 I /~/~~----"~....-::--=- ~:- ~~~-'=:7=" - - :.:~~ -.-.- -- (( '\ \\ ~ \ ~ \ .., \ ,jL2,\I,II-jr!y/\~~\::~.//,-~~j¡! t-1--\- 1,/ /,~': -I, \, " \ ... ·Lj.i ¡ / /N~\/ ~ ~ I \ ¡ I . ,"::_.-__--:://i, I \ \ ' \ I, /~~_/ --.1..._---1.... " />\~-\ // " \ /// ///..\. '., -~/_------ \. \\ ] 1 i.' I' , I Ir~11 \1, \1, \'1 \I.~\//L_J-.j//~._////___~::::~) -<. /./_/)(.?;-'\,~___/-.---1 (/) J ". \''-..... ::1' \ /~ , \ '<, A ! ./ ..;-'\'·"-...,ilJ -;; Oo!¡ I .I Q¡ I 1\ j/L-~/ .' (----~ I \' ,/ r·--{'~ ',.., \. §~ 0' <. I'~ i--tL- \. _-----/~.J.---.- '.,/ I ,,' G' ~___=_=_____~ \ I \ > ," ~ .' ~i . / ,~ / __'-cc~_:'._%-·_(- ¡:;¡E; I I ! J!r1?f-;>~-/~>-~-~ //22 j } t-/C: d), I I !.ff ,'j', -1.;\ ~ ~ .-/ r~ ''<>'»:. 1/ ( /It.~___ ~i¡""~- 1\;- II I' \ ~ :i -7 "\ /. J I! , 1 I i /' - . ¿ ';1 .)., ¡I,illl,M '. ...l/ h . / " , , , / \/ I .~ " Cj . / .-/' / ~'Hh~h~ !.,.o'~ s:' :&: a' rr ~ )Ji~ Hh!i ~'H~! .! èì5fmh ~ /' /' /' /' , :/,./>7' ,,,,~/' ,~-,?",,- ~ ,,-.;'" t) Ö} "".::J c: '. ~._' "", ..1;! .',' . .~"'- ù) '<I) ". c. ~,g't: .~ ~Cl:>~>~ ¡..: '~~è Ô~::~:} ! . . /' ~~ b !. HI¡~ I . SADDLE BROOK DRIVE EXTENSION i , I '" .~_.- .: .. " " .- . ~ -a ~ .. .. !i :: ~ ~lli:I~-iiJaiJ~~Ri::~~a ~~~!Ha, ¡"I"=I' ¡":J I~ I II I. 111 I I Ii! ¡ ; J I I I 11 II 1\ J 1_~1~1~1 ~ HBnjlhB in JH .~d B ~ ~ i:f3I ~ ).;. --~-..... . . ¡\II HI i~ h. ~~ ~õ:: .~ () ~H ~f ¡PUi ~,,~ª i; *~il!l ¡Iii n . I-~ ~1~1 IB" ·t"~ hti ""ff '5~1I Ht~ I~la w ----------"=-- I ~:O)õC)1 J ~~ ! c::; g OJ, ~ ( ) ã::i tJ) Q) ~ ,!!! (;51 THE LAKES and CHAMPIONS WAY ... ~ ~ ¡ ~ ~ o 0." ~¡;¡ :!~ f 11.11 I !:s,t!(1 , \ ' . ~ ~ ! I ~ I i I 1 ! . ¡ ¡ 1\ " I II ' ·,I'ë'!1ni ¡ I' . .1 . II , CJ 7-1 "" CJ CJ "" ~. I I--'- '" '" .þ- o:J :D en en I--'- I--'- ...::J .0 t~ "-' -.."I COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: OCTOBER 28, 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Administration MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Community Development Director DATE: October 22,2003 SUBJECT: Consider Approval of the Northeastem SI. Lucie County Greenways and Trails Conceptual Plan. On October 14, 2003 you will be asked to consider the approval of a resolution that adopts a conceptual greenways and trails master plan for Northeastern SI. Lucie County. The proposed plan was development as a result of a charrette held specifically to gain pUblic input and recommendations regarding future greenway and trail development in northeastern SI. Lucie County. The conceptual plan identifies proposed natural area greenways and recreational trails that would be assembled through the use of recreation and conservation lands, conservation easements, trail and open space areas in private developments. Public capital improvement projects as well as sidewalk, bikeway and trail systems associated with urban roadways will also be utilized in the assemblage of the trail system. The Northeastern SI. Lucie County Greenway and Trail Conceptual Plan is consistent with the adopted countywide greenway and trail plan and identifies specific locations and strategies for the implementation of trails identified in the adopted countywide plan. The proposed plan not only complements the Countywide Plan but it also refines the plan for northeastern SI. Lucie County and provides a tool for seeking State and Federal funding for the development of an integrated greenway and trail system. Staff recommends approval of the Northeastern SI. Lucie County Greenways and Trails Conceptual Plan and incorporation of the Plan into ttie 2001 adopted County's Greenways, Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. If you have any questions, please let us know. ~o~ I:!íJYVJ urphy, AICP Ity Development Director ""'" ....., Agenda Request Item Number: Meetln!! Date: (ðl) 10/28103 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg. [ ] [ ] [X] [ ] Quasi-JD [ To: Submitted By: , SUBJECT: Consider accepting the Northeastern SI. Luci Conceptual Plan. Board of County Commissioners Community Development BACKGROUND: On Saturday, May 31,2003, a community workshop was held at the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute to identify potential greenway and trail locations in northeastern SI. Lucie County. The proposed conceptual plan and associated report represents the compiled results of the community workshop. The Northeastern SI. Lucie County Greenways and Trails Conceptual Plan proposes a fully interconnected greenway and trail system that compliments and furthers the County's 2001 adopted Greenways, Trails and Bikeways Master Plan. FUNDS AVAilABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: On January 12, 1994 this Board, through Resolution No. 94-126, recognized the Indian River Lagoon Greenway. On July 21, 2001, this Board, through the adoption of Resolution No. 01-123, adopted and provided for the refinement of the "Green ways, Trails and Bikeways Preliminary Master Plan". RECOMMENDATION: Accept the Northeastern SI. Lucie County Greenways and Trails Conceptual Plan. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: D APPROVED 0 DENIED D OTHER· Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator Coordination! Signatures County Attorney Finance.: Environ. Resources; Mgt. & Budget: Fire Dept: Utility: Purchasing: Public Works: Other: ~ ....., COUNTY COMMISSION REVIEW: October 28, 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Administration MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: DATE: County Commission Community Development Director October 22,2003 SUBJECT: Consider accepting the Northeastern SI. Lucie County Greenways and Trails Conceptual Plan. On October 28, 2003 you will be asked to consider accepting the conceptual Greenways And Trails Master Plan for Northeastern SI. Lucie County. The proposed plan was developed as a resuU of a community planning charrette held specifically to gain public input and recommendations regarding future greenway and trail development in northeastern SI. Lucie County. The conceptual pian identifies proposed natural area greenways and recreational trails that would be assembled through the use of recreation and conservation lands, conservation easements, trail and open space areas in private developments. Public capital improvement projects as well as sidewalk, bikeway and trail systems associated with urban roadways will also be utilized in the assemblage of the trail system. The Northeastern SI. Lucie County Greenway and Trail Conceptual Plan is consistent with the adopted countywide greenway and trail plan and identifies specific locations and strategies for the implementation of trails identified in the adopted countywide plan. The proposed plan not only complements the Countywide Pian but it also refines the plan for northeastern SI. Lucie County and provides a tool for seeking State and Federal funding for the development of an integrated greenway and trail system. Staff recommends acceptance of the Northeastern SI. Lucie County Greenways and Trails Conceptual Plan. if you have any questions, please let us know. SUBMITTED: DJM GREENWAYACCEPTANCE_AGD(H) cc: County Administrator County Attomey \",.r -.."I NORTHEASTERN ST. LUCIE COUNTY GREENWAYS & TRAILS CONCEPTUAL PLAN Developing a linked Open Space and Recreation System 51. Lucie County Department of Community Development Planning Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 October 7, 2003 """ ...; EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report summaries the efforts of county staff and volunteers who participated in a community charrette focused on identifying opportunities to incorporate natural and cultural resources in Northeastern St. Lucie County as components in a viable greenway and trail system. The resulting greenways and trails plan is accomplished in a manner that creates a linear park system providing various recreational opportunities and non- motorized transportation options in Northeastern St. Lucie County. Common themes identified by charrette participants include: · Creating a trail system that accommodates various users · Linking existing and proposed conservation and recreation lands by trails · Utilizing public owned lands where available to create a trail system · Preserving, recognizing and protect native habitats and historical resources · Providing cultural and educational centers · Increasing recreational opportunities for residents and visitors · Improving the area's scenic quality · Establishing transportation routes that provide safe non-motorized access to schools and parks. Since 1995, ten tracts of land totaling 1,306 acres have been acquired in the Planning Area to protect natural resources and/or provide recreational uses. All of these lands contribute to the creation of a viable greenway and trail system by providing trails, serving as trailheads and/or providing trailside amenities. The connection of these resources will ultimately create a linear park system that allows residents and visitors to access the facilities without utilizing motorized vehicles. As Gladding and Jackson, Inc. stated in the 2002 Community Parks System Master Plan "It is critical to provide alternative modes of transportation (other than by automobile) in conjunction with parks and recreation system improvements in order to create a livable community". Planning Area Boundary The Atlantic Ocean defines the planning area to the east. The C-25 Canal is the southern border and the Indian River County line is the northern border. Emerson Avenue defines the Planning Area's western boundary. Consistency with Existing Plans and Studies In 1995, the Board of County Commissioners adopted a Greenways amendment to the Conservation Element of the Comprehensive Plan to "provide support for the integration of recreation, open space, and conservation areas into a connecting corridor". The connection of these resources is intended to "provide additional public access and enhance natural resource protection measures." Since that time, the County's 2001 adoption of the Greenways, Trails and Bikeways Conceptual Master Plan, the purchase of almost 7,000 acres of environmentally significant and park lands, and the construction of trail facilities has furthered the County's goal of developing a countywide ecological and recreational greenway network. 1 """ ...., A recent report by Gladding and Jackson, Inc. entitled Community Parks System Master Plan (2002) reaffirms that "residents want more sidewalks and trails to get around the community and to provide access to parks." During community workshops held by Gladding and Jackson, Inc., the most commonly identified "top priority need" regarding the existing parks system were sidewalks (#2), bike lanes (#3), multipurpose paths (#4) and nature trails (#5). An estimated 32 miles of trails are required to meet the projected 2005 population. Concept Plan Land purchased through the County's Environmentally Significant Lands Program, the Recreation Bond Program, and other existing and proposed public lands and historic resources are key components in the proposed greenway and trail plan. The concept provides almost eighty miles of an interconnected system of recreational trails connecting the communities of Lakewood Park, St. Lucie Village and Fort Pierce. The concept proposes the following trail types: · Multi-Use Trails (42.7) · Bike Trails (10.9 miles) · Nature Trails (7.1 miles) · Equestrian Trails (6.5 miles) · Paddling Trails (1.7 miles) · Ecosystem Interpretive Trail (10.7 miles) · Trailheads (6) Implementation The identified greenways and trails are to be assembled through the use of conservation and recreation lands, conservation easements, trails and open space areas in private developments and the development of sidewalks, bikeways and trails associated with urban roadways. In order to provide a rough cost estimate for the proposed trail improvements the cost to provide the 2.25 mile, 8 foot wide asphalt Lakewood P¡:¡rk Recreational Path was utilized. The total cost of the path was $406,000 and included construction, engineering and design costs, as well as rest areas and trash receptacles along the trail. Utilizing the estimated cost per mile of $180,455, the surface improvements for the charrette's proposed 53.6 miles of paved multi-use and bike trails would cost an estimated $9,671,852. Providing a paved asphalt trail on the 1 0.9-mile Bike Trail onJy would require an estimated $1,966,850. Obtaining grants from one of the numerous programs listed in the Funding Sources section of this report would significantly reduce the County's costs of providing the proposed recreational trails. The Northeastern St. Lucie County Greenways and Trails Concept Plan is a long-range strategy for the acquisition and development of a system of greenways and trails for resource protection, recreation, and transportation. The Implementation Strategies section of this report includes actions that can be taken immediately to start the process of greenway and trail development. II ""'" 'WI' Acknowledgments St. Lucie County would like to extend a special thanks to all charrette participants who have given their time toward the betterment of the northeastern St. Lucie County community. We would also like to thank the staff and management of Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute who have supported this effort from its inception and have generously donated their resources to the success of the charrette. The enthusiasm generated and direction established as a result of the greenways and trails charrette will serve to make St. Lucie County a better place to live. . The proposed charrette results and this report were also influenced by previous efforts. Most notable among these were publications commissioned by the County, including the St. Lucie County Greenway and Trail Conceptual Plan, the KBN: Upland and Wetland Habitat Inventory, the Gladding and Jackson Recreation Plan, and the St. Lucie County Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. """" -.",¡I TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION.. ............................. ........................................................................ 1 PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY .................................................................................... 1 OVERALL CONCEPT .................................................................................................... 1 CHARRETTE WORKSHOP ...........................................................................................3 Small Group Work Session ......................................................................................... 4 CONCEPTUAL PLAN .................................................................................................... 5 CHARRETTE RESULTS AND ANALYSIS ............................................................... 7 MULTI-USE TRAILS ...................................................................................................... 8 1. The Old Dixie Heritage Trail.................................................................................. 8 2. County Line Trail...................................................................................................9 3. Emerson Avenue .Trail........................................................................................ 10 4. Viking-Indrio .Trail............................................................................................... 10 5. Eastwood Canal Trail.......................................................................................... 11 6. Seminole Canal Trail...........................................................................................12 7. Lakewood Park Connector Trails ........................................................................ 13 8. C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail..................................................................................... 14 9. Kings Highway Canal Trail.................................................................................. 15 SINGLE PURPOSE TRAILS ........................................................................................ 17 10. Fort Pierce Farms Equestrian Trail...................................................................... 17 11. Fort Pierce Farms Bike Trail................................................................................ 18 12. Indian River Lagoon Paddling Trail..................................................................... 18 13. Indian River Lagoon Ecosystem Interpretive Trail............................................... 19 14. North Savannas Greenway & Nature Trail.......................................................... 20 TRAILHEADS .............................................................................................................. 22 15. The SI. Lucie International Airport Sports Park and Trailhead ............................. 22 16. Indrio Savannas Natural Area Trailhead.............................................................. 23 17. SI. Lucie Schoolhouse Trailhead......................................................................... 23 18. Capron Trail Park Trailhead .......................,........................................................ 24 19. Indrio Blueway Buffer Preserve Trailhead ...........................................................24 MILES OF TRAILS PROPOSED......................,...........................................................26 IMPLEMENTATION AND STRATEGIES ....;........................................................... 27 ACTION PLAN ............................................................................................................. 27 PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION.................................................................................... 27 PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION ..................................................................................28 FACILITY DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS................................................ 29 DESiGNS.................................................. ........ ........................... ................................ 29 Trailheads ....... ........... ... ....... ...... ............ ........ ....................... ............................ ........ 29 COSTS ......................................................................................................................... 29 THE BENEFITS OF PROVIDING GREENWAYS AND TRAilS............................. 31 ECOLOGICAL BENEFITS .... ........ ........................................... ........ .............. .............. 31 ECONOMICAL BENEFITS........................................................................................... 31 Business Recruitment ..Benefits................................................................................ 32 10/22/2003 Page 1 Greenways & Trails Conceptual p~ Northeastem 51. Lucie County "",. ....". Real Estate Benefits...... .................................... ....... ....... ........ .... ................. ............. 32 Eco-Heritage Tourism ..Benefits................................................................................ 32 HEALTH BENEFITS ....................................................................................................33 TRANSPORTATION .BENEFITS................................................................................. 34 Energy Conservation Benefits................................................................................... 34 LIVABILITY..... .................. .......... ......... ......... ..... ............... ................ ........................... 34 REFERENCES.. .... .... .... .... ........... ........... ........................... ....... ..................... .......... .... 35 FUNDING SOURCES..............................................................................................37 FEDERAL FUNDING SOURCES................................................................................. 37 Conservation Related.................................... ........... .............. ..................... .............. 38 STATE FUNDING SOURCES ...................................................................................... 39 Florida Forever Program ........................................................................................... 39 Greenways and Trails Land Acquisition Program...................................................... 40 Mine Reclamation ..................................................................................................... 41 Florida Department of State's Division of Historical Resources ................................. 41 Indian River Lagoon License Plate............................................................................ 41 Florida Coastal Management Program...................................................................... 41 Florida Highway Beautification Council Grants.......................................................... 42 INDIVIDUAL GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS........................................................ 43 VIKING-INDRIO GROUP ............................................................................................. 43 TRAILBLAZERS GROUP ............................................................................................ 46 HILL TOP GROUP ....................................................................................................... 48 10/2212003 Page 2 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastem St. Lucie County '-' 'WI' INTRODUCTION Northeastern St. Lucie County is an area of expansive native landscapes, several historic sites and emerging neighborhoods, all of which are characteristics conducive to the development of a system of interconnected recreational greenways and trails. On Saturday, May 31, 2003, a community workshop/planning charrette was held at the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute to identify potential greenway and trail locations in northeastern St. Lucie County. The Objective of this planning charrette was to identify projects that could fill the gaps in the existing greenways and trails system in this area and incorporate those recently acquired conservation and recreation lands into the system. This proposed conceptual plan and associated report represents the compiled results of the community workshop. PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY The general planning area for this project stretches from the Atlantic Ocean on the east to Emerson Avenue on the west, and from the Indian River County Line on the north to the C- 25 Canal on the south. Although, the general planning area includes both sides of the Indian River Lagoon, the May 3181 planning charrette focused on the development! identification of mainland trail routes. The general planning area has a rich cultural history including 46 historical structures, 26 archeological sites and one historic cemetery. Publicly owned historic facilities along the trail will provide an opportunity to educate residents and promote the historic preservation and cultural activities. Within the general planning area, numerous canals and canal bank rights-of-way can used as viable locations for hiking, bicycling and horseback riding. The majority of 1hese canals are owned and managed by the Fort Pierce Farms Water Control District. St. Lucie County owns and manages several canals in the Lakewood Park and Holiday Pines subdivision areas and the South Florida Water Management District manages the C-25 canal, the major canal effecting the northern parts of St. lucie Count. . The only existing paved trail within the general planning area is the Lakewood Park Recreational Path, which is located in the Kings Highway Canal right-of-way. OVERALL PLANNING CONCEPT The Charrette participants proposed an interconnected system of greenways and trails that would provide recreational opportunities and safe access between public places and neighborhoods. Land purchased through County and State acquisition programs and historic sites are key components· of the general design concept. This concept utilized the following trail types: Multi·Use Trails (hikers, cvclists and skaters): these may be paved or unpaved. Where paved trails are associated with roadways they should be separated as far as possible from the pavement; landscaping or other buffers should be used as appropriate; '0/22/2003 Page 1 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastem St. Lucie County '"-" Bike Trails Nature Trails Equestrian Trails Paddlinq Trails Ecosvstem Interpretive Trail Trailheads 1012212003 Page 2 -..."I these are paved trails exclusively for the use of bicyclists; these hiking trails provide scenic, historic and wildlife- viewing destinations; these trails are exclusively for horseback riders; these waterway trails are located along the Indian River Lagoon shoreline; this is an educational trail on various public owned and managed conservation sites. Trailheads provide vehicle parking for trail access and information as well as a place to rest along the trail. Where possible, these facilities are located on existing public owned lands that provide passive or active recreational uses. Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern 51. Lucie County '-' THE CHARRETTE PROCESS ..." The Northeastern St. Lucie County Greenways and Trails Planning Charrette was patterned after other charrettes held in the community and included a brief, intense community workshop. The objective of this approach is to maximize public participation and input from those who live and work in the planning area. Public notice was accomplished in two ways. Two weeks prior to the charrette postcards. were mailed torésidents and bùsinesses inviting them to attend the planning charrette. The Sunday prior to the charrette, a display ad was placed in the Fort Pierce Tribune. The display ad was run again the Wednesday before the charrette. On Saturday, May 31, 2003, staff and volunteers gathered at the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute Johnson Education Center Annex to participate in the half-day greenway and trail charrette. CHARRETTE WORKSHOP The planning charrette workshop began with opening commentsbyJan Petri, Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institution's Intergovernmental Coordinator. Mr. Petri welcomed participants to the Harbor Branch facility and discussed Harbor Branch's mission, existing programs and their plans for the development of trails at Harbor'Branch. St. Lucie County Commissioner Doug Coward provided the County's greenway and trail perspective. He discussed previous planning efforts and opportunities in the planning area for the connection of greenways. and trails. as . well as some of the benefits eXpected from greenway and trail development. An introduction to Greenway and Trail development in Florida was provided through the presentation of the State Greenways and Trails Program production entitled "Connecting Florida Communities". The video provided an excellent overview of greenway and trail types with examples of existing greenways and trails from various communities across the State. Interviews with community leaders focused on the benefits their communities received from developing successful greenway and trail projects. Following the video, St. Lucie County Planning Manger David Kelly presented a PowerPoint presentation of local resources that provide opportunities for the development of greenways 1012212003 Page 3 Greanways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern St. Lucie County '-" -.,J and trails, including canal and road rights-of-way and existing and proposed public conservation lands. Mr. Kelly's presentation also included photos of various types of trails other communities have developed. Randy Stevenson, Assistant Community Development Director for St. Lucie County, described the charrette process and provided instructions prior to the participants separating into three groups. The task was to identify and graphically display desired greenway and trail locations and types on base maps. Participants were also asked to take notes and to select a group member to present the group'!? final·design. SMALL GROUP WORK SESSION The small group work session was an interactive design session with staff and participants collaborating in the development of an interconnected greenway and trail system. This provided an open forum for County staff and local citizens to brainstorm ideas and concepts for greenway and trail development. To begin the session, the participants were divided into three groups of 5 to 10 people. Each group included at least one County Planner. Each table was provided an aerial map and a base map indicating the existing publicly owned lands, recreation sites, school sites, sidewalk and bike facilities in the general planning area. The base map also identified several proposed sidewalks and bike lanes that have been recommended during previous planning exercises for this part of the Community. Various other maps, including the County's adopted Greenways, Trail and Bikeways Plan, drainage maps, and land use maps were available for reference. Each table worked "hands-on" to produce a map that summarized the recommendations and ideas that resulted from their extensive discussions. The small group work session concluded with a presentation of each group's design and recommendations. Comments were written down during each group's presentation of their designs. Common themes from each planning group included: · Creating a trail system that accommodates various users; · Linking existing and proposed conservation and recreation lands by trails; · Utilizing public owned lands where available to create a trail system; · Preserving and recognizing native habitats and historical resources; · Providing cultural and educational centers; · Increasing recreational opportunities for residents and visitors; · Improving the area's scenic quality; · Establishing attractive transportation routes. 1012212003 Page 4 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern Sl. Lucie County '-" 'wi CONCEPTUAL PLAN Following the general planning charrette exercise, the three groups designs and recommendations were synthesized into a single plan that would taken by County Staff and developed into the proposed Conceptual Greenways and Trails Plan for northeastern St. Lucie County. In cases where only the purpose and type of facility were recommended, County Staff identified what appeared to be a suitable route location. Recommendations that cannot be graphically depicted are addressed in the Results and Analysis section of this report and/or provided under the Individual Group Recommendations. 10/22/2003 paga 5 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern St. Lucie County '-' 10/2212003 Page 6 INSERT CONCEPTUAL MAP wi Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeestern 51. Lucie County '-- ....I CHARRETTE RESULTS AND ANALYSIS The purpose of this section is to report the participant's vision for a system of greenways and trails in northeastern SI. Lucie County and to provide an initial indication of the feasibility for realizing that vision. Almost eighty miles of trails are proposed with at least some portion of all designs containing public owned land. The Charrette results reflect the participant's strong sense of the area's natural and cultural heritage and their desire to protect and share these resources. For ease of reading and identification, each trail has been named. The name in most cases is associated with existing public facilities or locations. A number that corresponds to the Trail Key on the conceptual map identifies each trail's location. Charrette participants identified the following greenways and trail projects: 1. Old Dixie Heritage Trail (Multi-use Trail) 2. County Line Trail (Multi-use) 3. Emerson Avenue Trail (Multi-use) 4. Viking-Indrio Trail (Multi-use) 5. Eastwood Canal Trail (Multi-use) 6. Seminole Canal Trail (Multi-use) 7. Lakewood Park Connector Trails (Multi-use) 8. C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail (Separate Equestrian, Bicycle and Pedestrian Trails) 9. Kings Highway Canal Trail (Multi-use) 10. Fort Pierce Farms Equestrian Trail 11. Fort Pierce Farms Bike Trail 12. Indian River Lagoon Paddling Trail 13. Indian River Lagoon Interpretive Trail 14. North Savannas Greenway & Nature Trail 15. The SI. Lucie International Airport Sports Park and Trailhead 16. Indrio Savannas Natural Area Trailhead 17. SI. Lucie Village Schoolhouse Trailhead 18. Capron Trail Park Trailhead 19. Indrio Blueway Buffer Preserve Trailhead 20. C-25 Canal Trailhead 1012212003 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Page 7 Northeastam Sl. Lucie County "". ....", Multi-Use Trails 1. The Old Dixie Heritaae Trail The Old Dixie Heritage Trail extends from the Highway A-1-A (North Causeway Bridge) trail corridor to the Indian River County line linking the communities of SI. Lucie Village and Indrio. Facts: )0 Total Length of 6.5 miles; )0 Paved multi-use trail; )0 Connects to the County Line Trail and Highway A-1-A sidewalks, with links to the SI. Lucie Village Heritage Park, Indrio Blueway Buffer Preserve and the Indrio Scrub Preserve nature trails. Future links to the North Savannas Nature Trail and the SI. Lucie International Airport Sports Park and Trailhead. One of the top priorities of all groups is a multi-use trail along Old Dixie Highway. This trail was recommended to provide a safe travel corridor for bicyclists who regularly use Old Dixie Highway and to provide pedestrian and bicycle access to North Hutchinson Island's trail system. Additional objectives include providing trail links between the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute and existing conservation and historic sites along the Old Dixie Highway corridor. Participants described the hazardous conditions on the Old Dixie Highway for bicyclists. The roadway is narrow and there were reports of vehicles often traveling at high speeds. Participants believe there is sufficient land between the Old Dixie Highway and the Florida East Coast Railroad to provide a multi-use trail that accommodates both pedestrians and bicyclists. It was also noted that much of Old Dixie Highway provides picturesque scenery of the lagoon and SI. Lucie Village, providing an attractive travel corridor. A recommendation was made to maintain existing vegetation along the'route and to landscape the trail corridor where needed to enhance it's attractiveness. The Old Dixie Heritage Trail is proposed as a hard surface multi-use trail utilizing lands between Old Dixie Highway and the Florida East Coast Railroad. This trãil will provide non- motorized access to the looped nature trails on several conservation sites and allow users to continue along the A-1-A corridor to the North Hutchinson Island trail system. There was also a discussion of the potential to extend the trail into Indian River County to Orchid Island and North Hutchinson Island to provide a looped trail. Participants reqûested that the County coordinate with Indian River County regarding the extension of the proposed trail. A safe trail link to the Indrio North Savannas Natural Area and the proposed Airport Trailhead on the west side of US1 was also recommended. Analysis The 6.5-mile Old Dixie Heritage Trail corridor includes 34 separate parcels under the ownership of 28 individuals. SI. Lucie County, SI. Lucie Village or the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute own 8 of the 34 parcels that account for 6.25 acres of the 24.25 1012212003 Page 8 Greenways & TraHs Conceptual Plan Northeastern St. Lucie County \w< ....I acres required to develop the trail. The right-of-way width between Old Dixie Highway and the Florida East Coast Railroad varies throughout this corridor. In general, there appears to be adequate land area to develop this trail along the existing right-of-way, however final trail designs will determine the exact right-of-way needs. Privately owned lands along the corridor would need to be purchased or placed under a conservation easement to allow for the development of the trail. Creation of this trail will further the goals of the Village of St. Lucie and St. Lucie County adopted greenway and trail plans. Both general plans identify the development of this trail. The proposed Old Dixie Heritage Trail extends from the Indian River County Line to the existing sidewalks along SR A-1-A (north) to provide non-motorized access to North Hutchinson Isla.nd and several conservation sites along Old Dixie Highway. The trail would ultimately connect to other non-motorized facilities in Indian River County. Bike paths and sidewalks are proposed in the Indian River County Bicycle and Peaestrian Plan and the County is currently drafting a scope of services for a countywide greenway plan. SI. Lucie County's greenway and trail plan will be utilized to identify potential regional connections, such as Old Dixie Highway. Old Dixie Highway is highly ranked on Indian River County's bike/ped list and has the strong support of Indian River County residents. In June 2003, there were two Florida Communities Trust (FCT) projects submitted along this trail. SI. Lucie Village submitted an FCT application called ·SI. Lucie Village School,House Heritage Trail" for purchase of a 1.43-acre parcel along this corridpr and several smaller parcels totaling 3.29 acres. The Marine Resources Council also submitted an application to FCT requesting funds for the acquisition of 32.22 acres between the Florida East Coast Railroad right-of-way and the US 1 Highway. If successful, these projects will provide additional trail amenities and land along the trail route in publiélsemipublic ownership. ************************ 2. County Line Trail The County Line Trail utilizes a canal trail along the Indian River County line. Facts: » Total length of 2.8 miles; » Multi-use trail corridor; and » Connections to the existing Lakewood Park Recreational Path with future connections to the North Savannas Greenway and Nature Trail, Old Dixie Heritage Trail, Emerson Avenue Trail, Fort Pierce Farms Equestrian Trail and the Eastwood Canal Trail. Participants proposed a multi-use trail along a canal that is located on the north side of North Boulevard, the northernmost east/west corridor in the planning area. This trail is proposed to connect the Emerson Trail to the Old Dixie Heritage Trail, via the North Savannas Greenway. The trail also provides a potential connection to the existing Lakewood Park Recreational Path and other proposed trails in Lakewood Park. 10/22/2003 paga 9 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastem St. Lucie County '- "'" Analysis This trail, in conjunction with the Old Dixie Heritage Trail and the recommended canal trails, would provide a continuous connection to the Indian River Lagoon and the C-25 Canal system. A partnership with Indian River County is required to develop this trail. Initial discussions with Indian River County staff were encouraging and included the possibility of a future access point from Old Dixie Highway to Indian River County's Harmony Oaks Preserve located along the Indian River Lagoon and the county line. ..............**...****. 3. Emerson Avenue Trail This paved multi-use trail is associated with roadway facilities. Facts: ~ Total length of 2.5 miles; ~ Paved multi-use trail corridor; and ~ Connects to County Line Trail, Fort Pierce Farms Bike Trail, and the Capron Trail Park Trailhead with links to the Old Dixie Heritage Trail and the C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail. This trail was proposed to connect the County Line Trail to the Viking-Indrio Trail and provide bicycle and pedestrian access to the future Capron Trail Parle Analysis This trail will most likely be developed as part 01 future roadway expansion plans. The proposed Emerson Estates development on the east side 01 Emerson Avenue includes an 8-foot wide sidewalk within the road right-aI-way that will be constructed by the developer. The extension 01 this sidewalk (multi-use trail) would link the proposed County Line Trail and the Viking-Indrio Trail to the luture Capron Trail Park entrance road on Emerson Avenue. Emerson Avenue between the north county line and Indrio Road has a right-of-way width 01 85 feet, sufficient to provide the proposed multi-purpose trail. ..*..*.*.*.*.*.*****...* 4. Vikina-Indrio Trail This trail is associated with Indrio Road and is to be provided with as much separation from the roadway as possible. Facts: ~ Total length of 3.8 miles; ~ Paved multi-use trail associated with roadway facilities; and 1012212003 Page'O Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern St. lucie County '- ...¡ ~ Connects to the existing Indrio Savannas Natural Area with future connections to the proposed Emerson Trail, Seminole Canal Trail, Eastwood Canal Trail, Fort Pierce Farms Bike Trail and Fort Pierce Farms Equestrian Trail with links to the County Line Trail, the C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail and the St. Lucie Airport Sports Park and Trailhead. All groups identified trail improvements along Indrio Road with the most expansive extending from the Emerson Trail to the Old Dixie Heritage Trail. This trail would connect to the North Savannas Trail and canal trails extending north and south of Indrio Road. PartiCipants recommended the historic tree canopy on Indrio Road be protected. This scenic area of the road should be called the "Tree Tunnel". Analysis Future roadway improvements or expansion of Indrio Road should provide an off-road multi- use trail if adequate right-of-way is available or can be purchased. Improvements providing safe access between proposed trails on the north and south side of Indrio Road will be required to provide safe access along the trail system. These facilities should be incorporated into the designs for the Indrio roadway widening project. The Viking-Indrio Trail should ultimately be extended to 1-95. The preliminary Indrio Road widening report, dated December 2000, proposes five-foot concrete sidewalks with bicyclists utilizing the paved portion of the roadway shoulders. To meet future non-motorized needs, a fully signed and marked bicycle lane is required and the proposed sidewalk should be widened to a multi-use trail of at least 10 feet in width. A landscaped buffer should also be provided between the roadway and the trails. ****.******************* 5. Eastwood Canal Trail Paved multi-use trail connecting northern Lakewood Park to the Turnpike Feeder Road sidewalk and bike path. Facts: ~ Total length of 2.3 miles; ~ Paved multi-use canal trail in Lakewood Park; and ~ Future connections to the County Line Trail, Lakewood Park Connector Trail and the North Savannas Greenway and Nature -Trails with links to the Old Dixie Heritage Trail and the C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail. This canal trail was proposed to provide a connection from the proposed County Line Trail to the Turnpike Feeder Road bicycle and pedestrian facilities. Analysis This north/south trail between the Lakewood Park neighborhood and the Spanish Lakes Country Club Village and Portofino Shores subdivisions is the only proposed trail that 10/22/2003 paga 11 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastam Sl Lucia County \or ....., connects the Lakewood Park neighborhood to. the Turnpike Feeder Road. The Eastwood canal right-ol-way also extends south tolndrio Road providing a link to the proposed Viking- Indrio Trail. This section 01 the trail is located just east 01 the Indrio Crossing Shopping Center providing the potential lor a luture link to the shopping center via Miramar Avenue. This trail, in conjunction with an east/west connector trail to the Lakewood Park Recreational Path, would allow children in the Portolino Shores and Spanish Lakes County Club to bike or walk to community parks, schools, and the luture regional park. A bridge crossing the Eastwood Canal into the Portolino Shores neighborhood will be required to provide access Irom the development site. Between the north County line and Miramar Avenue, the canal right-ol-way is owned and maintained by St. Lucie County; Irom Miramar Avenue to Indrio Road the canal is part 01 the Fort Pierce Farms canal system. A 70-loot canal right-ol-way and the adjacent road right 01 way (widths vary) should provide adequate land lor this trail. ************************ 6. Seminole Canal Trail Paved multi-use canal trail in the Lakewood Park. Facts: ~ Total length 012.5 miles; ~ Paved multi-use trail associated with Seminole Canal; and ~ Connects to the Lakewood Park Elementary School, Lakewood Park Connector Trails and the Capron Trail Park Trailhead, with luture links to the Lakewood Park Recreational Path, the Fort Pierce Farms Equestrian Trail, the County Line Trail, and the Canal-Lagoon Trail. This trail extends lrom North Boulevard Road to Indrio Road with trail connections to the Indrio Road Schoolhouse, the Lakewood Park Elementary School and the proposed Capron Trail Park. This trail is intended to provide children sale passage to school and to provide a recreational trail connected to the proposed Capron Trail Park and the historic schoolhouse. Analysis The Seminole canal right-ol-way is 70 leet in width Irom North Boulevard to Palomar Road where the right-ol-way increases to 80 leet. Additional right-ol way is available Irom the adjacent 70-loot Seminole Road right-ol-way. From North Boulevard to Hibiscus Road, the northern boundary 01 the proposed regional park, the west side 01 the canal right-ol-way is already cleared and suitable lor a paved trail. From Hibiscus Road south the trail is proposed to meander south along the east side 01 the Capron Trail Park, continuing along the western canal right-ol-way to Indrio Road. A trail extending along the Emerson Estates property line, or merging with its internal pedestrian system, would accommodate existing and luture residents. '0122/2003 Page'2 Greenways & TraRs Conceptual Plan Northeastem Sl. Lucie County ~ "-' The west side of the canal appears to have a wider right-of-way and has the advantage of being adjacent to large tracts of land, including the proposed Capron Trail Park and Emerson Estates. A bridge crossing prior to reaching Miramar Avenue is required to reach the proposed Miramar connector trail. The construction of this trail in conjunction with the proposed Miramar connector trail would provide school children in western Lakewood Park and Emerson Estates safe access to the elementary school and the future park. *********.....*******... 7. Lakewood Park Connector Trails This includes east-west trails that connect public lands, schools and parks to north/south trails in Lakewood Park. Facts: ~ Total length of 2.1 miles; ~ Paved multi-use trails. ~ Connects to the existing Lakewood Park Recreational Path and Fort Pierce Boulevard sidewalk, the Seminole Canal Trail, the Eastwood Canal Trail with links to the County Line Trail and the Emerson Avenue Trail. All groups proposed an east-west connector in the Lakewood Park. neighborhood to connect the proposed Capron Trail Park on Emerson Avenue and the Lakewood Park Elementary School to the existing Lakewood Park Recreational Path. Of particular importance to the group was an east-west connector to allow children the ability to bikeQr walk to school safely. An east/west connector between the Seminole Canal Trail and the Lakewood Park Elementary School with a connection to the Lakewood Park Recreational Path was a priority. In central Lakewood Park, Hibiscus and Donlon Roads were proposed as the locations to link the future Capron Trail Park to the proposed Eastwood Canal Trail in order to provide bicycle and pedestrian access to the future Capron Trail Park and a safe travel corridor for children walking and bicycling to school. Miramar Avenue was proposed as the location of the southernmost trail. The Miramar Trail Would provide a trai1 between the Seminole Canal Trail and the Lakewood Park Recreational Path, to allow children to travel to school safely. An east/west connector between Fort Pierce Boulevard and the existing Lakewood Park Recreational Path was proposed as the priority trail to allow children the ability to bike or walk to school safely. Analysis The County's Public Works Department recently completed a sidewalk project along Santa Barbara Drive that provides children safe access from the Lakewood Park Elementary School to the Lakewood Park Recreational Path to the east. The Department also plans to connect the Santa Barbara sidewalk system to Indrio Road via a sidewalk along Lakewood Park Drive with an extension along Indrio Road to the Kings Highway Intersection. This addresses the eastern portion of the southernmost connector trail. The construction of the 10/2212003 Page 13 Greenways & Trells Conceptual Plan Northeastarn St. Lucie County ....... ...., Emerson Canal Trail and trail along Miramar Avenue, between the Fort Pierce Boulevard sidewalks and the proposed Emerson Canal ~ Trail would fill the gap in this connector trail. The proposed Hibiscus/Donlon Trail in central Lakewood Park is the most efficient means of providing additional children the ability to bike or walk to school and the future regional park. The trail route follows Hibiscus Road from the future Capron Trail Park to the Fort Pierce Boulevard sidewalk system. From the Fort Pierce Boulevard sidewalk the trail continues north (2 blocks) to the proposed Hibiscus/Donlon Trail connector to the Eastwood Canal Trail. According to the County's roadway inventory the right-of-way width on Hibiscus Road, Donlon Road and Miramar Avenue is 70 feet. This is the same right-of-way width available along Santa Barbara Drive where a sidewalk was recently installed. The development of the proposed connector trails will link east and west Lakewood Park neighborhood by a non- motorized trail system providing safe bicycle and pedestrian access to the elementary school and the future Capron Trail Park. ************************ 8. C-25 Canal-Laqoon Trail This trail utilizes the Canal C-25 canal to provide separate bike, equestrian and pedestrian trails. Facts: » T otallength of 11.1 miles; » Separate bike and equestrian trails with links to existing bike paths and sidewalks; » Connects to the Fort Pierce Farms Equestrian and Bike Trails and the North Savannas Trail with future links to the St. Lucie County Airport Sports Park, Indrio Savannas Natural Area Trailhead and County Line Trail; and » Provides trail access to the Sheraton Scrub Preserve nature trails. All groups recommended a connection of trails within the planning area to proposed trails along the C-25 Canal. Participants also recommended that the C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail provide a separate trail for bicycle and equestrian trail users. Easterly and westerly access points were proposed to connect the C·25 Canal-Lagoon Trail to trails in the northern portion of the planning area. The Lakewood Park neighborhood and parks are connected to the C-25 Canal, via the Emerson, Seminole and/or Kings High~ay Canal Trails. The second trail alignment extends the North Savannas Nature Trail south through the eastern side of the airport to the Indian River Lagoon (IRL), via the C-25 Canal. The North Savannas is connected to the C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail via existin~ North 25th Street non- motorized facilities or an off-road trail proposed just east of North 25 Street. There was also a request to link the C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail with the City of Fort Pierce and the Zora Neal Hurston Heritage Trail. 1012212003 Page 14 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeestem Sl. Lucie County ...... ....; Analysis The C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail is proposed as a multi-use trail on the County's adopted Master Plan. The proposed Northeastern St. Lucie County greenways and trails plan provides separate equestrian and bicycle trails as well as a multi-use path along the C-25 corridor. The C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail contains a large right of way, most of which is over 200 feet. One exception is the area of Kings Highway and Angle Road. At this point the canal is only 147 feet wide and the business on the northwest side of the canal (adjacent to Kings Highway Industrial Park) is very close to the canal bank. A creative solution will be needed to provide safe passage along this narrow section and to ensure safe passage to the east side of Kings Highway. An overpass for trail users should be considered. An equestrian trail is proposed on the north side of the canal to maintain the greatest separation from vehicular traffic. The equestrian trail terminates at the Sheraton Plaza Park, which was proposed as a trailhead as part of the adjacent Sheraton Scrub Preserve FCT project. A multi-use trail with separate bicycle facilities is located along the south side of the canal and continues into the City of Fort Pierce. These routes link the C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail to the proposed Fort Pierce Farms Bike Trail, Kings Highway Multiuse Trail, the Fort Pierce Farms Equestrian Trail, the North Savannas Greenway and Nature Trail .and two trailheads. Sheraton Plaza Park's location on the north side of the G-25 Canal may be suitable as a trailhead for equestrians, as well as bicyclists and pedestrians. The/existing park contains parking, restrooms and active recreational facilities. A parking area: for horse trailers wòuld be required to utilize the trailhead for equestrian uses. ..***.****************** 9. Kinas Hiahwav Canal Trail Extension of the existing multi-use trail associated with the Kings Highway canal. Facts: ~ Total length of 5.5 miles; ~ Multi-use trail associated with roadway facilities; and ~ Connects the existing Kings Highway Canal Trail to the future G-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail, with links to the Fort Pierce Farms Bike Trail, Fort Pierce Farms Equestrian Trail and the North Savannas Nature Trail. This multi-use trail extends from the existing Lakewood Park Recreational Path to the the south side of the canal and continues into the City of Fort Pierce. These routes link the C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail to provide a link between the Lakewood Park neighborhood the C-25 Canal system trails. Analysis This trail begins at the southern terminus of the existing Lakewood Park Recreational Path to provide a contiguous multi-use trail from the North County Line to the C-25 Canal, 10/2212003 Page 15 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Nor1he..tem St. Lucie County ..... -' continuing east along the the south side ot the canal and continues into the City ot Fort Pierce. These routes link the C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail into the City ot Fort Pierce. The proposed trail is located on the west side ot the Kings Highway Canal (No.4) to provide maximum buffering trom motorized traffic. One bridge crossing would be required to provide this trail. The County's Department ot Public Works has plans to connect the existing Lakewood Park Bike Path to Indrio Road with an extension along Indrio Road to the Kings Highway Intersection. From Indrio Road south the canal right-ot-way width varies between 60-100 teet. The lands available tor the proposed trail will depend on the width between the top ot the bank and the edge ot the right-ot-way, which will need to be determined. It the existing canal right-ot-way cannot accommodate this trail, right-ot-way acquisition will be required. Adjacent lands are primarily vacant or in agricultural uses. Future intersection improvements along Kings Highway should be designed to accommodate all non-motorized users. This particularly applies to Angle Road, Indrio Road, and St. Lucie Boulevard. A Kings Highway overpass, located in close proximity to the C- Canal, would provide the optimum roadway crossing. Existing road and canal rights-ot-way south ot the C-25 Canal should be identified to continue the trail south to the tuture State Route 70 recreational trail. This would provide a connected trail between the north County line to the tuture State Route 70 recreational trail, which will begin just west ot the Florida Turnpike. 10122/2003 Page 16 GreenweY' & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern Sl Loole County '-' ...., Single Purpose Trails 10. Fort Pierce Farms Eauestrian Trail An equestrian trail along the Fort Pierce Farms Seminole Canal right-of-way. Facts: ~ Total length of 3.5 miles; ~ Improved Equestrian Trail; and ~ Connection to the C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail, the Indrio Trail and the Seminole Canal Trail, with links to the County Line Trail and the North Savannas Greenway and Trail. Participants recommended a trail exclusively for the use and enjoyment of those traveling on horseback be provided and requested that a location for an equestrian trailhead to serve the trail be identified. The group requested the trail utilize one of the existing canal rights-of-way south of Indrio Road and be linked to the proposed C-25 Canal trail. Analysis The west side of Seminole Road is planned to accommodate the Equestrian Trail. The equestrian route extends from Indrio Road to the C-25 Canal where It continues east to the Sheraton Plaza Park, a potential equestrian trailhead. The Seminole Canal right of way width varies between 80 feet alit's north end to 110 feet at its outall point into Fort Pierce Farms Canal No.1, just north òf the C-25 Canal. A bridge over Canal No.1 is required to reach the C-25 Canal. From the C-25 Canal the trail extends along the north side of the canal to the C-25 Canal Trailhead to the west and the Sheraton Park Trailhead to the east. The Fort Pierce Farms Water Control Districtmaintains the Seminole and Basin One canal right-of-way for drainage purposes. The· District· has expressed the following concems: liability, canal maintenance, and development and maintenance of the trails themselves. Staff believes these items can be addressed if the County agrees to be responsible for development and maintenance of the trail faci1ities. A concern also rose over the disposal of canal material that may remain on the canal bank after dredging maintenance activities. The County could ensure the District that if this occurs, the trail will be closed (signage required) or the County would assist with the removal of the dredged material. Section 375.251, Florida Statutes addresses the District's liability concerns. This section limits the liability of persons making land available to the public for recreational purposes without charge. Section 260.Q12 further limits private landowner's liability if the trail is designated as part of the statewide system of greenways and trails. Legal review and a brief of these statutes, and any others that apply, is required to adequately address this issue. ************************ 1012212003 Page 17 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern Sl Lucie County ~ - ""' ...." 11. Fort Pierce Farms Bike Trail This is a paved trail dedicated .for the exclusive use of bicyclists. The trail is proposed for location within the Emerson canal right-of-way of the Fort Pierce Farms Water Control District's Emerson Canal. Facts: » Total length of 3.5 miles; » Paved Bike Trail; and » Future connections to the Emerson Avenue Trail, Seminole Canal Trail, the Canal- Lagoon Trail and the Lakewood Regional Park Trailhead. Participants identified the general location of this trail and requested staff identify the specific canal trail location for inclusion within the proposed greenway and trail plan. Analysis This trail provides a separated bicycle facility beginning at Indrio Road to the C-25 Canal where the trail continues east along the south side of the C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail to the City of Fort Pierce. The right-of-way width along Emerson Canal varies from 85 feetAh width to 110 feet. Although, the west side of the Canal has the widest available right-of way, the east side was chosen to eliminate the need to construct bridges over the six canals between Indrio Road and the Basin 1 Canal. Emerson Avenue extends along the east side ofthe canal right-of- way and may provide additional land for the proposed bike trail. The existing road right-of- way width is narrow with as little as 36 feet in width in one area. A Basin 1 trail bridge is required to reach the C-25 Canal. The ultimate trail location will depend on the available width of the right of way and receiving permission from the Fort Pierce Farms Water Control District. Initial discussions with the District governing body have identified the following concerns that must be addressed: liability, canal maintenance, and development and maintenance of the trails themselves (See trail #10 for discussion). .*.******..*.**.*******. 12. Indian River LaaoonPaddlina Trail This trail includes a canoe/kayak launch facility on the Indrio Blueway Buffer Preserve and a canoe/kayak dock at the St. Lucie Village Heritage Park. Facts: » Trail Length of 1.7 miles; 1 0/2212003 Page 18 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastem Sl. Lucie County '"",, ....", ~ Waterway canoe/kayak paddling trail with links to nature trails on the Indrio Blueway Buffer Preserve and the St. Lucie Heritage Park sites and the Old Dixie Heritage Trail; and ~ Future links with North Hutchinson Island trail system. All groups proposed the connection of public lands via a paddling trail along the lagoon. Participants also recommended a canoe/kayak trail plan be developed that includes waterway trails on the east and west sides of the Indian River Lagoon. Analysis The County's first paddling trail along the Indian River Lagoon is proposed as part of the St. Lucie Village Heritage Park and the Indrio Blueway Buffer Preserve FCT projects. The Heritage Park will include a canoe dock and the Indrio Blueway Buffer Preserve will provide a canoe launch and serve as the Paddling Trailhead. To development a comprehensive paddling trail plan, a gathering of interested groups and individuals should be convened to identify trail routes and trailheads along the lagoon's shoreline. North Hutchinson Island has existing facilities at Pepper Park Riverside that provide the required facilities for a trailhead. The park provides parking; restrooms and canoe/kayak launch facilities. In the future an alternative launching site will be available at Queens Island, where a canoe launch site is proposed. North Hutchinson Island, with its numerous mangrove islands and vegetated shoreline is an ideal area to begin development of a paddling trail. The State Greenway and Trails Program recommend the following trip lengths: short trails (up to v., day trips) will be 2-8 miles in length. Full day trips will be 8 to 15 miles in length with trip lengths greater than 15 miles accommodating overnight trips. ************************ 13. Indian River Laaoon Ecosvstem Interpretive Trail This is an educational interpretive. trail that encompasses three conservation areas on the mainland and one on North Hutchinson Island. Facts: ~ Total length of 10.7 miles; ~ Paved multi-use trail associated with Indrio Road, Old Dixie Highway and A-1-A; ~ Connects trail to conservation lands on North Hutchinson Island. The purpose of this trail is to provide public access to a cross section of original ecosystem habitats. The trail is to provide educational signage that depicts the four ecosystems that make up the area between the interior flatwoods and the beach. The group also requested that the ecological diversity that is found in close proximity to all public access points be recognized by signage. 10/22/2003 Page 19 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern Sl. Lucie County '"'" ...", Participants recommended a boat tour or water taxi be provided from the Indrio Blueway Buffer Preserve Trailhead to Avalon State/ Recreation Area on North Hutchinson Island, which would provide depictions of the ecosystems of the barrier island and access to the beach. Participants also requested thatsignage and location information about the North Hutchinson Island historic inlet be provided on the appropriate site. The group thought that Pepper Park might be the location of the Historic Inlet. Analysis The 1992, KBN wetland and Upland Habitat Inventory for St. Lucie County recommended the North Savannas be utilized in conjunction with Harbor Branch and the Avalon State Park to develop a segmented interpretive trail to show a cross-section of SI. Lucie County's original habitats from the interior flatwoods to the barrier island beach. With the public ownership of lands representing original habitats from the interior pine flatwoods to the ocean shoreline, it is now feasible to provide this segmented interpretive trail. This trail will provide education displays and access to the following natural communities: Pine flatwoods, Swale marsh (Savannas), Scrub, Maritime hammock, Mangrove marsh, coastal strand and dune system. Consideration should also be given· to . providing interpretive signage and information material highlighting the off shore reef communities. Signage and location information about the North Hutchinson Island historic inlet should also be provided on the appropriate site. Full implementation of the proposed greenway and trail plan would allow the trail to be accessed via auto, bicycle, hiking, canoe or a boat tour and water taxi. Safe passage across US Highway 1 to connect the Indrio North Savannas to Indrio Scrub would facilitate pedestrian and bicycle access to this trail. ***...***********....... 14. North Savannas Greenwav & Nature Trail This greenway and trail includes existing and proposed conservation lands within the North Savannas ecosystem. Facts: ~ Total length of 8.5 miles; ~ Nature trails with links to on-road bike lanes and sidewalks; ~ Connects to the County Line Trail and C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail; ~ Provides trail access to the existing Indrio Savannas Natural Area and nature trails; ~ Potential wildlife corridor. The majority of this greenway and trail was proposed as part of the adopted countywide greenways and trails plan. The purpose of this greenway is to protect the remaining undeveloped lands of the North Savannas ecosystem and provide a trail link from the north County line to the C-25 Canal. The group recommended that acquisition of the North 10/22/2003 Page 20 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northaastern Sl. Lucie County '-' ...." Savannas lands be aggressively pursed to protect the remaining North Savannas marsh system and its aquifer recharge functions. Participants also requested the remaining natural areas on the east side of the airport be preserved, including the remaining scrub habitat Participants proposed extending the existing trails in the Indrio Savannas Natural Area to the proposed County Line Trail, which runs east and west To the south, this trail extends through the eastern side of the airport to the Indian River Lagoon, via the C-25 Canal. From North 25'h Street south,the nature trail utilizes a county owned and managed canal system . adjacent to the proposed Airport Trailhead then continues south to the C-25 Canal and the Indian River Lagoon. The trail also connects to existing sidewalks and bike paths on North 25th Street that provide an existing link to the C-25 Canal. Analysis The proposed North Savannas conservation lands are part of the lands selected for purchase through the County's Environmentally Significant Lands and the Save Our River's Programs. The County Attorney's office maintains contact with the major property owner who has indicated he is interested in selling to the County, however, not at this time. Acquisition of smaller tracts should be considered. The proposed nature trail extends from the north County line to the C-25 Canal with links to the neighborhoods of Holiday Pines, Lakewood Park, Spanish Lakes and Paradise Park. The trail utilizes existing public lands in the Indrio Savannas Natural Area, an existing canal rights-of-way and lands along the eastern side of the St Lucie County International Airport. The majority of the private owned lands are located south of St Lucie Boulevard. The portion of the trail that transverses the east side of the airport has often been recognized as a conservation or mitigation area. The bouf'ldaryof lands within the eastern portion of the Airport should be clearly identified and a management plan developed to restore and maintain the native plant communities. A location to access the trail from North 25th Street and Indrio Road should be identified. Signage and informational material would need to be developed. 1012212003 Page 21 Greenways & TraUs Conceptual Plan Northeastern St Lucie Coun1y '"" -..,.,I Trailheads 15. The St. Lucie International Airport Sports Park and Trailhead The St. Lucie International Airport Sports Park and Trailhead will utilize existing public owned lands in the Ridgehaven area to provide Trailhead facilities and a Bicycle Motorcross (BMX) track. Facts: );> 5+ acres; );> Full trailhead facilities; );> Bicycle Motorcross Track (BMX); and );> Connections to the North Savannas Trail with future links to the C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail and the Old Dixie Heritage Trail. Participants propose a Trailhead with a BMX track in the Ridgehaven area of the airport. The proposed Ridgehaven area consists of previously disturbed lands purchased to meet federal buffering requirements for the St. Lucie County International Airport. This property is separated from the airport facilities and located along the proposed North Savannas Greenway and Nature Trail. Analysis The County's Airport Director and Recreation Director were generally supportive of the proposed BMX track and trailhead. Other potential uses· discussed· were an All Terrain Vehicles (ATV) track and Skate Park facilities. These uses are not currently offered in St. Lucie County and the demand for these types of recreational arÈ!as is increasing. Development of a BMX track (and associated facilities) would require 5-10 acres of land, incorporating the A TV track into the sports park will require another 50 acres, the skate park is not land intensive and could be sited on Jess than 1 acre. Therefore, approximately 60 acres is required to provide all three uses. The BMX track area would provide the parking; restrooms, drinking water and rest areas to meet the needs of trail users. This Trailhead would accommodate users along the North Savannas Nature Trail and the North 25th Street sidewalk and bike lane through providing a link to a 7 acre tract on the east side of North 25th Street that is owned by St. Lucie County and managed by the County's Department of Parks and RÈ!creation. The 25'" Street park area should be improved with a small parking area to provide an alternative access point to the Nature Trail and the adjacent Trailhead facilities. Pedestrian and bicycle access to the proposed BMX facility would be provided via a bridge over a county owned and managed drainage canal. Remnants of a previous bridge still exist. ************************ 1012212003 Page 22 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastem Sllucle County '-' ...; 16. Indrio Savannas Natural Area Trailhead The Indrio North Savannas Natural Area contains 345 acres owned and managed by St. Lucie County. Facts: );0 345 Acres; );0 Parking area, informational kiosk, picnic tables and 2.8 miles of nature trails exist on the site; );0 Restroom facilities and bike racks are needed; and );0 Wildlife rehabilitation center (such as dolphins), an outdoor amphitheater or visitor center improvement. All groups recommended the Indrio Savannas Natural Area be utilized as a Trailhead with full facilities. Proposed facility types include: Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute Dolphin and Whale Rehabilitation program, a Wildlife Rehabilitation Center, an indoor or outdoor amphitheater or an education building. Participants were advised that a Raptor Rehabilitation Center and facilities associated with the Harbor Branch Dolphin Whale Rehabilitation Program have been discussed as a potential use. It was agreed that the site should be designated a Trailhead with full facilities and the potential for additional public facilities. Analysis The Indrio Savannas Natural Area contains several acres adjacent to its entrance road that have been degraded by past sand mining practices. This area currently includes a parking area; information kiosk, picnic tables and a large metal building left over from past mining activities. This area would be suitable for larger facilities as recommended during the Charrette. Development of a rehabilitation center, outdoor amphitheater or visitor center will require revision of the management plan and Florida Communities Trust (FCT) approval. ************************ 17. St. Lucie Schoolhouse Trailhead The Village of St. Lucie owns and manages this historic site. Facts: );0 2 Acres; );0 Parking area and restroom facilities exists; and );0 Informational kiosk and bike racks would be required. A recommendation was made to utilize the St. Lucie Village Schoolhouse as a Trailhead for the proposed Old Dixie Heritage Trail. The school has an existing parking area and restroom facilities will be accessible without entering the school. The Village has submitted an application to FCT seeking funding for the purchase of an adjacent tract of land. Participants 10/22/2003 Page 23 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern Sl Lucie County '-' -..I wanted the feasibility of incorporating the adjacent parcel into the trailhead to be determined. Analysis Use of this site will require the St. Lucie Board of Aldermen approval. The parcel next to the school is 1.43 acres and should be considered for incorporation into the trailhead, if purchased. The parking area may require improvements and bicycle parking facilities. ************************ 18. Capron Trail Park Trailhead Proposed Regional Park between Emerson Avenue and Seminole Road in Lakewood Park. Facts: ~ 156 acres of active and passive recreational activities; ~ Parking area, informational kiosk, picnic tables and nature trails, restroom facilities and bike racks are needed; and ~ Would provide access to the Seminole Canal Trail and the Emerson Trail with links to the County Line Trail and Fort Pierce Farms Equestrian and"Bike Trails. An objective of all groups was to provide pedestrian and biking connections to lands recently purchased in Lakewood Park for the development of a regional park. The 156 County owned site is located on the south side of Hibiscus Road and the east .side of Emerson Avenue. The facility will include active and passive recreational facilities. Analysis The Capron Trail Park's conceptual master plan includes active and passive recreational activities and facilities sufficient to accommodate trail users. The park's main entrance will be on Emerson Avenue with a non-motorized entrance on Hibiscus Road, west of the Seminole Canal. The park's proposed nature trail connects to the proposed Seminole Canal Trail, with links to the Lakewood Park Connector Trails. Extending the 'trail through the northern and eastem boundary of ,the park would provide a shaded and attractive trail setting. Development of this trail thrpughthe park will require modification of the proposed FCT project. ************************ 19. Indrio Bluewav Buffer Preserve Trailhead St. Lucie County is purchasing this 105-acre site along the Indian River Lagoon through the Florida Communities Trust Program. 10/2212003 Page 24 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastem Sl. Lucie County '-' ..." Facts: ;¡. 105 Acres; ;¡. Canoe launch, parking area with bike racks, restrooms, nature trails and interpretive signage; ;¡. Natural trails linked to the Old Dixie Heritage Trail; and ;¡. Canoe trail linked to 51. Lucie Village Heritage Preserve. This trailhead is proposed to provide access to the Indian River Lagoon and to provide access to the paddling trail. Analysis Development of the site as a trailhead is consistent with the proposed FCT management plan. The existing management plan proposes a canoe/kayak launch at the end of Wilcox Road, which has been recognized as a preserve road. The site will also provide a .9-mile nature trail through the hammock and pine flatwoods and a .3-mile dike trail along the lagoon. Restrooms were not anticipated in the management plan but should be considered as part of the trailhead. ***********************. 20. C-25 Canal Trailhead An existing public use area along the C-25 Canal. Facts: ;¡. Existing boat launch and unimproved parking area; ;¡. Parking area improvements with bike racks, restrooms and interpretive signage; ;¡. Along the C-25 Canal-Lagoon Trail with links to the Seminole Equestrian Trail and Emerson Bicycle Trail. The group requested that a trailhead for equestrian users be identified. The Florida Department of Transportation rest stop was identified as a possible trailhead to serve the C- 25 Canal trail users. Analysis An existing boat launching ramp is located on the south side of C-25 Canal right-of-way, just west of Johnson Road and Angle Road and the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) rest stop. The Fish and Game Commission permitted the boat ramp in the 1960's. The site is currently used as a boat launching area with unimproved parking areas along the canal right-of-way. Improving this area to provide trail facilities would be the most efficient means of providing parking for all trail users, including equestrians. Permission from the South Florida Water Management District will be required to designate the proposed area for trailhead parking and it is not likely that the construction of full trailhead facilities with restrooms will be permitted. A formal request will be required to determine if trailhead facilities can be provided along the right-of-way. 1012212003 Page 25 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern Sl. lucie County "",. ..., The FDOT should also be contacted regarding the use of their lands. If this proposal is not feasible an additional location needs to be identified to provide full trailhead facilities in the western portion of the trail system. The Sheraton Plaza Trailhead, just west of 25111 Street can serve the trails users at the eastern end of the C-25 trails. The trailhead was proposed as part of the adjacent FCT project. At the very eastern end of the C-25 Canal, near it's confluence with Basin 1, the canal has a 300 foot right-of-way and South Florida Water Management District owns an 100 X 1000 strip of land on the north side of the Canal and Rosarita Avenue. SFWMD staff has indicated that this area may also be available to the County for recreation and trail facilities. Miles of Proposed Trails The following table indicates the miles of existing and proposed trails by type in the planning area. All non-motorized facilities identified as part of previous planning studies are included. MILES OF TRAILS PROPOSED Northeastern SI. Lucie County Trail Designation Miles Nature (Hiking) Multiple Use Bike Interpretive CanoelKayak Equestrian 33.7 45.5 10.9 10.7 1.7 6.5 Total Proposed (Includes Sidewalks/Bike Lanes) Total Existing (Includes Sidewalks/Bike Lanes) 97.7 42.5 Total Existing and Proposed Source: Department of Community Development 143.20 1012212003 Page 26 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastem Sl. Lucie County '-' ...., IMPLEMENTATION AND STRATEGIES The Northeastern St. Lucie County Greenway and Trail Conceptual Plan provides the next step towards providing an interconnected greenway and trail system in Northeastern St. Lucie County. The trails within this ambitiousplan will not be developed without setting forth systematic steps to implement the plan. The following implementation recommendations provide immediate steps and long-term strategies that can lead to the development of the proposed greenway and trail projects. Action Plan The following list provides actions that can be taken immediately to start the process of greenway and trail development. Many of these items require staff time and will supplemental funding. · Present the Plan for acceptance to the City of Fort Pierce and the Village of St. Lucie; · Designate a Greenways and Trails Steering Committee or Advocacy Group, the County's Recreation Advisory Board may fill this role; · Develop partnerships involving the general public and interested organizations to assist with the implementation of the plan; · Determine rights-of-way widths available for trails on selected corridors · Recommend the Old Dixie Heritage Trail and the Indian River I::agoon Canoe Trail for designation as part of the State Greenways and Trails system; · Integrate the St. Lucie Greenways and Trails Master Plan into the County's long- range transportation plans, including the right-of-way abandonment process; · Begin the process to secure funding for the development of trails and trailheads on publicly owned lands; · Construct trails on existing public lands; · Prioritize Transportation Enhancement funds not currently programmed; and · Seek required authorizations for canalrights-of-ways. Project Implementation Implementation of an interconnected greeoway and trail system can occur by: · creating a local funding mechanism; .' · utilizing the land development process; · including greenway and trail improvements in other capital projects (transportation and stormwater management); and · pursuing grants from state, federal and nonprofit programs. Establishing a local funding source for greenways and trails is a recommended long-term priority. Having funds readily available to meet local matching requirements to leverage outside funding resources provides the best approach for a program of sustained trail development. The Funding Sources section of this report provides a brief summary of possible grant information on programs that directly apply to greenways and trails. 1012212003 Page 27 Greenways & Trens Conceptual Plan Northeastem St. Lucie County '-' ....., The County's Comprehensive Plan and Land Development Regulations should be reviewed and updated to ensure that future development is compatible with the vision of the County's Greenways and Trails Master Plan. Just as many local governments require sidewalks to be built during the development process, local governments can require the development of greenways and trails as part of the Development Order. Program Implementation The establishment of a formalized Greenways and Trails Program will accelerate the development of these recreation and preserved resources and raise the public's awareness of the County's intent to create a greenway and trail network throughout the community. The program could be accomplished in the following manner: 1. Utilize existing staff from various departments. At least one person should be assigned as project manager to coordinate with the various departments and track greenway and trail progress. Greenway and trail development could be made a priority of the project manager's duties. 2. Create a Greenways and Trails Program within an existing County Department. A program manager with staff dedicated to the development of greenwaysand trails would be provided. This will require additional staff and funding. Full time staff dedicated to the implementation of the adopted greenway and trail plan will accelerate it's development. 10/22/2003 Page 28 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern St. Lucie County '"'" ~ FACILITY DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT COSTS Greenway and trail costs will vary depending on the trail design, location and proposed trail amenities. In general, costs are primarily associated with land acquisition, surfacing improvements, trailhead facilities and long-term management. Other costs are those associated with planning, education and public relations. The most efficient approach to provide greenways and trails is to utilize existing public lands. To reduce the cost of future greenway and trail development, these facilities can be incorporated into future conservation, recreation, transportation and surface water management plans. Incorporating facilities during the planning and engineering phase of capital improvement projects is more cost-effective than adding them later. DESIGNS The Northeastern St. Lucie County Greenways and Trails Plan is a conceptual plan created without the technical details required to determine the ultimate trail surface type and width. Designs for each trail location should be developed with participation and input from user groups and the public. In many cases the ultimate trail features will be determined by the landscape and the width of the available right-of-way. Many communities around the nation and state have extensive experience with the development and use of trail systems, which can provide valuable ínformation for the trail designer. The Florida Office of Greenway & Trails Program provides standards and guidelines for all types of trail development. For example, the program recommends unpaved trails be four to eight feet wide. The recommended minimum width for paved recreational trails is twelve feet for trails expected to receive more than occasional mixed use (bicycles, pedestrians and skaters). TRAILHEADS Trailheads provide vehicular parking for trail access and information, as well as a place to rest along the trail. Trailheads may include the following features: restrooms, drinking water, bike racks, informational kiosks containing maps, trash receptacles, and site furniture as appropriate to each site. Special interpretive signs for historical sites, wildlife areas and other educational landmarks are important features for trail users. Air machines for tires may also be provided at trailheads along paveC bicycle trail corridors. COSTS Land and construction costs are the most substantial expenses related to the development of greenways and trails. While the cost to acquire privately owned lands will vary with location and the size of right of way, the linear cost for surface improvements are more standardized. Surface improvements cost will also vary in accordance with the site's topography, whether the improvement is a new facility or a retrofit of existing facilities, and if restoration, landscaping and trailside amenities are included. However, a rough cost estimate can be determined. The costs of existing trails in St. Lucie County were utilized to obtain an estimate of the cost associated with the development of paved trails. The project costs for paved trails are from the year 2000. 1012212003 paga 29 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastem Sl. Lucie County ""' .""", The Lakewood Park Trail, Phase 1 project .cost was $406,000. This trail is an 8-foot wide asphalt trail extending 2.25 miles along the Kings Highway canal right-of-way. The total cost of $406,000 included construction, engineering and design costs, as well as rest areas and trash receptacles along the trail. The use of a contractor with their own asphalt plant reduced the cost by about half. Phase 2 of this project is now underway and some of the improvements and costs associated with this phase include: Lakewood Park Design - $109,000 Bridge crossing the canal - over $40,000 each. . The Indian River Lagoon Trace includes an 8-foot wide concrete trail extending 2.75 miles along South Hutchinson Island. The total cost of the trail was $1,100,000. This includes the cost for construction, engineering and design. Rough estimates of cost by improvement type are shown below. Although, the estimates for the paved surfaces are based on the actual cost of local trail projects, surfacing costs may be greater for shorter trail lengths. ESTIMATED COST* ImDrovement TVDe Cost Nature Trail (4·8 It wide) $5,000-10,ooo/mlle ASohalt Trail '8 It wide) $180 4451mile Concrete Trail (8 It wide\ $400,000/mile Raised boardwalk (4 It wide) $425,000/mile Bike Lockers (For two Bikes\ . $ 3,200 'WalkIDon't Walk' Sianal svstem (Two comers) . $ 1,900 Source: St. Lucie County Departmenl of Public Worns Florida Office 01 Policy Planning, Policy Analysis and program Evaluation, 2002 'Does not include rlnhl·ol-wav .. Although this is a conceptual plan, an estimate of some of the proposed facility costs can be provided. For example, using the above cost estimates for an asphalt trail, the surface improvements for the 53.6 miles of paved multi-use and bike trails would cost an estimated $9,671,852. In some cases these trails could be developed as unpaved trails to significantly reduced project costs. Providing a paved asphalt trail on the Bike Trail route only will cost an estimated $1,966,850. Assuming half of the 53.6 miles of proposed multi-use trails were unpaved the approximate cost of the multi-use trails and bike trails would cost an estimated $4,835,926 for surface improvements. In many cases, there would be additional costs related to land acquisition and trailside amenities. Obtaining grants from one of the numerous programs listed in the Funding Sources section of this report would also significantly reduce the County costs of providing these recreational trails. 1012212003 Page 30 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan NortheaStern St Lucie County '" ..", THE BENEFITS OF PROVIDING GREENWAYS AND TRAILS Greenway and trail benefits extend beyond the protection of natural resources, providing additional recreation and alternative modes of transportation. They can also diversify the local economy and provide the framework for the development of a more unified urban area. There is an increasing volume of evidence that Greenways and Trails have a positive effect on communities. Some of the benefits of developing greenways and trails include: · making communities better places to live by preserving and creating open spaces; · encouraging physical fitness and healthy lifestyles; · creating new opportunities for outdoor recreation and non-motorized transportation; · strengthening local economies; · protecting the environment; and · preserving culturally and historically valuable areas. ECOLOGICAL BENEFITS Development of an interconnected greenway system can further local efforts to maintain the County's native plant communities and species biodiversity. » Flora and fauna benefit from larger, contiguous habitat areas; » Greenways and Trails protect biological diversity through preserving native landscapes and providing connections between habitats that allow for migration and breeding of plants and animals; » Greenways and Trails help improve air and water quality. Trails provide enjoyable and safe options for transportation, which reduces air pollution. Protecting native buffers around wetlands and along shorelines prevent soil erosion and filter pollutants; » The miles of pervious greenspace proVided by trail segments will protect water quality and recharge the aquifer; » The estimated value of all economic benefits generated by a single are of wetlands is between $150,000 and $200,000 (Stephen Miller, 1992). ECONOMICAL-BENEFITS Communities across America have experienced an economic revitalization due in whole or in part to trails and greenways. The economic effects of trails and greenways are sometimes readily apparent (as in the case of trailside businesses), and are sometimes more subtle, like when a company decides to move to a particular community because of the greenway and trails amenities provided (Rails to Trails Conservancy Web Site, 2003). 10122/2003 Paga 31 Graanways & Trails Concaptual Plan Northaastam Sllucla County "" ..", New and increased business opportunities and enhanced property values are two of the most notable economic benefits reportedcfrom other communities with greenway and trail systems. BUSINESS RECRUITMENT BENEFITS High quality business ventures locate to areas with natural landscapes and recreation and cultural amenities that attract employees. ~ Open space/parks/recreation ranked number one among factors used by small businesses in choosing a new business location (Lerner, Steve and William Poole, 1999); ~ A 1998 report by the Center for the Continuing Planning of the California Economy found that conservation of open space and higher density development were essential to preserve a higher quality of life, an important factor in attracting employers and employees to California localities (Lerner, Steve and William Poole, 1999); ~ The results from a survey conducted by the Sierra Business Council of California found that retaining the rural character of the countryside was imperative to attract businesses. Greenways and trails protect native landscapes and provide open space to retain the rural character of the countryside (Rails to Trails .Conservancy web site, 2003). REAL ESTATE BENEFITS Property values often increase due to the addition of greenwaysand trails. There are also financial benefits to builders and developers, such as the increased marketability of real estate. More and more advertising campaigns for new developments focus on the acres of protected native lands and the miles of linear trails the project contains or accesses. ~ In the 1994 American Lives survey, customers were shown to want features that promote social interaction with others, such as biking, walking paths and nature trails. Buyers are willing to pay a premium for this kind of outdoor living area (Lerner, Steve and William Poole, 1999); ~ In 1990, 48 percent of Denver resiç!ents said they would pay more to live near a greenbelt or park. A tremendous increase from the 1980 survey which reported that only 16 percent of Denver residents said they would pay more to live near a greenbelt or park (Lerner, Steve and William Poole, 1999). ECO-HERITAGE TOURISM BENEFITS The Office of Sustainable Ecosystems & Communities, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency defines 'Ecotourism" as '~ravel and recreation to natural areas that is designed to contribute substantially to those areas' conservation and enhancement, through education and the dedication of tourism dollars to protect natural resources. Ecotourism is a relatively small component of the total nature tourism industry, but is growing rapidly" (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003). 10/22/2003 Paga 32 Greenways & Trails Coneaplual Plan Northeaslem St. lucie County ~ ...." " Since 1991, expenditures in Florida for watchable wildlife recreation have increased 30 percent. The economic effect from 2001 watchable wildlife recreation in Florida was estimated at $1.6 billion ($1.2 billion by residents and $402.1 million by non- residents) (Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 2001); " The fastest growing segment of nature tourism, growing 30% annually, are non consumptive activities: bird and other wildlife watching, hiking and backpacking, nature planning and photography, boating, biking, camp[ng and picnicking, and allied activities (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 2003). As an industry, Florida tourism is one of the state's top three revenue producers (Florida Department of State, 2002); " Coastal tourism and recreation are important components of the largest and most rapidly growing activity in the world--international tourism (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1998); " The Indian River Lagoon region is a popular resort and vacation destination, which received over six million visitors in 1995 and provided economic benefits of approximately $730 million (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, 1998); " Historic sites are growing in popularity as destinations for pleasure trips: 40 percent of families traveling on vacation stop at historic sites. During 2000, heritage tourism expenditures in Florida amounted to an estimated$3.721 billion (Florida Department of State, 2002); " "Heritage tourism can offset the costs of maintaining historic sites, help stimulate preservation efforts, and perpetuate the sense of place that lends communities their unique character and identity. At the same time, heritage tourism can realize important economic gains with respect to jobs, income, and tax revenues" (Florida Department of State, 2002). HEALTH BENEFITS Greenways and Trails connected to neif hborhoods and native landscapes can create attractive and accessible places to exercise (Rails to Trails Conservancy, 1996). " The U.S. Surgeon General estimates that 60% of American adults are not regularly active and another 25% are not active at all. " In a planning survey of residents in 12 counties in southeastern Missouri, 55.2% of trail users who responded to the survey stated that they are walking more now than before they had access to a trail. In addition, women and people with a high school education or less were twice as likely to have increased their amount of walking since using trails (Rails to Trails Conservancy, 1996). " The Centers for Disease Control, reported that almost half of the 12-21 year olds are not active on a regular basis and 40% of all high school students are not even 10/2212003 Page 33 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastem Sl. lucie County ~ ..,I enrolled in physical education classes. Neighborhood trails can provide school age children free and safe access to healthy recreational activities. TRANSPORTATION BENEFITS Greenways and Trails provide alternative modes of travel by providing non-motorized transportation routes. Few, if any, modes of transportation are as available to as many people as bicycling and walking. Children, senior citizens and the economically disadvantaged may find these modes their only means of transport. . While bicycling and walking has increased, high traffic volumes and speeds have reduced the number of roadways where the bicyclist and pedestrian can travel safely. »0 On Monday, June 23, 2003, CNN posted an associated press regarding a Transportation Research Board report finding that each year, about 175 children are killed by motor vehicles while walking or riding bicycles between home and school. Per mile, bicyclists have the highest rate of injury or death. Kids on foot are the next highest Development of an interconnected trail system can reduce childhood casualties by providing safe travel corridors that connect neighborhoods to schools. »0 Trails that connect residential areas with retail areas and neighborhoods with schools provide safe and pleasant environments for people to commute. Off· road trail facilities provides the safest and most attractive travel corridors. »0 Nationwide, households spent an average of $7,000 on transportation in 1999, nearly 20 percent of their income and second only to the amount they spent on housing (US DOT, 1999). ENERGY CONSERVATION BENEFITS »0 Providing alterative modes of transportation can result in converting motorized to non-motorized travel resulting in reducing the consumption of fossil fuels and transportation costs. »0 Conversion of motorized travelers to non-motorized travelers has the potential benefit of reducing air pollution; improving the overall efficiency of any existing transportation system and providing health benefits for its uSers. LIVABILITY Greenways and trails provide a safe place for people to enjoy recreational activities and often function as viable transportation corridors. The ability to'avoid congested streets and highways, and travel through natural areas on foot or by non-motorized means, is a large factor in a community's "livability." (Stephen Miller, 1992) Sustainable design principles include making neighborhoods as pedestrian-friendly and as bicycle friendly as possible. The creation of a bicycle and pedestrian system also creates links to future mass transit systems and provides links to neighborhoods, employment centers and other activities center (James A. Moore, Ph.D. and Julie M. Johnson, 1994). 10/22/2003 paga 34 Graanways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeaslem Sl. lucie County ""'" ..., REFERENCES Lerner, Steve and William Poole. The Economic Benefits of Parks and Open Space. San Francisco: The Trust for Public Land, 1999. www.tpl.org. Stephen Miller, "The Economic Benefits of Open Space," Islesboro Islands Trust, (Islesboro Islands, ME: Islesboro Islands Trust, May 1992). Rails to Trails Conservancy, Health and Wealth Benefits, www.trailsandgreenways.org. Physical Activity and Heaith: A Report of the Surgeon General, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1996.) Florida Department of Transportation. Pedestrian Planning & Design Training Manual, Tallahassee. FL. 1991. Florida Department of State, Economic Impacts of Historic Preservation in Florida. Tallahassee, FL September 2002. Florida House of Representatives, Committee on Tourism, Florida's rural economic development: the roie of culturallheritage-based and nature-based tourism, Tallahassee, FL 2001. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Year of the Ocean Coastal Tourism and Recreation "Coastal and Marine Tourism in the United States', 1998. Internet: http://www.yot098.noaa.gov/yoto/meeting/touuec_316.html U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Sustainable Ecosystems 8< Communities. Nature- based Tourism Issue Brief # 1, 2003. Internet: http://www.epa.gov/ecocommunity/tools /econatt5.pdf Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, The 2001 Economic Benefits of Watchable Wildlife Recreation in Florida, Tallahassee, 2001. U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000, Transportation Statistics Annual Réport (TSAR). Washington, DC, 2000 Rails to Trails Conservancy. Economic Benefits of Trails and Greenways. www.trailsandoreenwavs.oro. (James A. Moore, Ph.D. and Julie M. Johnson. TRANSPORTATION, LAND USE AND· SUSTAINABILlTY, Tampa, FL, 1994) U.S. Department of Transportation, National BicyCling and Walking Study -Five Year Status Report, 1999. www.bikewalk.orgl Additional sources: National Park Service, Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program, 'Economic Impacts of Protecting Rivers, Trails, and Greenway Corridors," 4th ed. (Washington, DC: National Park Service, 1995), 1-8. John L. Crompton, Lisa L. Love, and Thomas A. More. 'An Empirical Planning of the Role of Recreation, Parks and Open Space in Companies' (Re) Location Decisions," Journal of Park 1012212003 paga 35 Graanways & Trans Conceptual Plan Northeastern Sl. Lucie County -..... ...., and Recreation Administration, 15:1 (Champaign, IL: American Academy for Park and Recreation Administration, 1997), 37-58. Terry Davies and Sarah Cahill, Environmental Implications of the Tourism Industry, Discussion Paper 00-14, Washington, DC, March 2000. Internet: http://www.rff.org 10I22l2OO3 Page 36 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern Sl Lucie County ~ -.I FUNDING SOURCES The County Commission's 2001 approval of the St. Lucie County Conceptual Greenways, Trails and Bikeways Master Plan has provided vital support for funding through Florida Communities Trust and other grant programs. Endorsement of the Northeastern St. Lucie County Greenways and Trails Plan is expected to further assist the County as it seeks State and Federal funding for the development of an integrated greenways and trail system in the planning area. Greenways and trails may be part of various capital improvement projects providing numerous funding sources to assist with the cost of acquiring and developing greenways and trails. These funding sources may be linked to various County departments, including Public Works, Parks and Recreation, and Community Development. Federal Funding Sources The Transportation Equity Act for the 2101 Century Administered through the Florida and US Departments of Transportation. Provides funding for a wide variety of alternative transportation projects, including bicycle and pedestrian paths and recreational trails. Awards vary and are on-going. Recreational Trails Program (RTP) The U.S. Congress first authorized the Recreational Trails Program in the early 1990's under ISTEA; it was reauthorized in 1998 under TEA-21. Funds are provided to states for the development and maintenance of recreational trails and trail related facilities for motorized and non-motorized recreational trail users. The Florida Department of Environmental Protection's, Office of Greenways and Trails administers this grant in coordination with the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration. Federal, state, county and municipal governmental agencies may apply for this grant. The maximum grant award is $50,000 with a dollar-for-dollar match; Cash and/or in-kind services apply to the matching requirement. Eligible projects under the Recreational Trails Program are as follows: · Maintenance and restoration of existing recreational trails; . Development and rehabilitation of trailside and trailhead facilities and trail linkages; · Purchase and lease of recreational trail con'struction and maintenance equipment; · Construction of new recreational trails (with restrictions on new trails on Federal land); · Acquisition of easements or property for recreational trails or recreational corridors; · Operation of educational programs to promote safety ¡¡nd environmental protection as those objectives related to the use of recreational trails. Federal web site: www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/rectrail.htm State RTP information: www.dep.state.fl.us/gwt/resourcelindex.htm Transportation Enhancement Program (TEP) The Transportation Enhancement Program (TEP) is a federal program administered by the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT), as part of TEA-21. Originally funded under ISTEA, funding is continued through a ten percent set aside from Surface Transportation 1012212003 Page 37 GreenwaY' & Trolls Conceptual Plan Northeastem St. lucie County """ ...",¡ Funds. Project sponsors undertake projects and eligible costs are reimbursed. Eligible projects include: · Provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles and the provision of safety and educational activities for pedestrians and bicyclists; · Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites; · Scenic or historic highway programs (including the provision of tourist and welcome center facilities); · Landscaping and other scenic beautification; · Historic preservation; · Rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures, or faculties (including historic railroad facilities and canals); · Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian or bicycle trails); · Control and removal of outdoor advertising; · Archaeological planning and research; · Environmental mitigation to address water pollution due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity, and the establishment of transportation museums. Planning efforts, project development and environmental studies, design work, right-of-way acquisition, construction operations, and construction engineering and inspection services are eligible for funding. The FDOT District Offices coordinate with the Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPO) to solicit new applications. The request for new applications , generally follows the annual updating of the FDOT five-year work program that is done in cooperation with MPO's and Counties. Conservation Related The following programs, which are administered by the National Park Service (NPS) to provide funding for the establishment and development of greenways and trails: . Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistancæ(RTCA) Program . Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) · Urban Park and Recovery Program (UPARR) Web site: www.nps.gov/partners.html. Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) The Federal Land and Water Conservation Fund (LWCF) is administered through the FDEP through a matching grants program, and can be utilized to acquire corridors to develop trails and facilities. There are two primary criteria, which must be met in order to be eligible for funding under this program. These criteria are as follows: · The project must be part of the five-year Capital Improvement Plan; · Public participation and input meeting must be held to involve and inform the public of the proposed project. 10/2212003 Page 38 Greenways & TreHs Concepluel Plan Northeastem St. lucie County ~ """ Congress appropriates monies annually and directs it to the states through 50:50 matching grants. Matching monies by the local government can be from Federal Revenue Sharing funds, Community Development Block Grants, or from other local sources in the form of cash, in kind services, or the land value of donated real property. Each local government can only submit one application per year and it must include a detailed description, scope, conceptual plans, and costs estimates. Federal web site: www.ncrc.nps.gov/lwcf/ State web site: www.dep.state.fLus/parkslbdrs/grants State Funding Sources Florida Forever Program The Florida Forever Program, which was approved by the Florida Legislature in 1999, is the successor program to the Preservation 2000 Program. As the primary source of funding for Florida's land acquisition programs, Florida Forever include several programs that may be targeted for SI. Lucie County's greenways and trails. They are the Florida Communities Trust (FCT), Save Our Rivers (SOR), Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL), the Greenways and Trails Program and the Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program (FRDAP). Several state agencies will share the approximately $300 million a year that Florida Forever will provide for preserving land and improving water supply. Effective,July 1, 2001, the bond proceeds are to be distributed annually from the Florida Forever Trust.Fundas follows: · Department of Environmental Protection, 40% ($120 million) Conservation and Recreation Lands (CARL), 35% ($105 million) Recreation and Parks, 1.5% ($4.5 million) Florida Recreation Development Assistance Program (FRDAP), 2% ($6 mil) Greenways and Trails, 1.5% ($4.5 million) · Water Management Districts (SOR), 35% ($105 million) · Florida Communities Trust, 22% ($72 million) · Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services/Forestry, 1.5% ($4.5 million) · Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, 1.5% ($4.5 million) Florida Communities Trust (FCT) The Florida Communities Trust (FCT) Program provides assistance to local governments to implement the conservation, recreation and open space, and coastal management elements of local Compr~hensive Plans. Grant awards are made to local governments for land acquisition for the purposes of natural resource conservation and outdoor recreation. Extra credit is given to greenways and trails projects and to communities that include greenways policies in their Comprehensive Plans. The limitation of awards to an applicant selected for funding by the Florida Communities Trust shall not exceed ten percent of the amount of funds available, except awards to partnership applicants. For partnership applicants, the limitation shall not exceed twenty percent of the total funds available to date. '0/2212003 Page 39 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern Sl. Lucie County ~ ...." Four environmental land projects in the planning area boundary have been purchased through the FCT program. An application to assist with the funding of the Lakewood Regional Park was submitted to FCT in June 2003. Conservation and Recreational lands (CARL) The CARL Program is administered by FDEP's Division of State Lands and is designed to conserve and protect unique areas, endangered species, unusual geological features, . wetlands and significant archaeological and historical sites, which are of statewide or regional significance. The CARL program acquires land to be used as parks, recreation areas, wildlife management areas, forests and greenways. http://www.dep.state.fl.uslstlandloeslcarlmain.htm Greenways and Trails land Acquisition Program In 1979, the Florida Recreational Trails Act (Chapter 260, Florida Statutes) created the Florida Recreational Trails System to establish a network that allows responsible public access for recreation, scenic and historical trails connecting state, federal and local parks, forests recreation areas and historic sites. P2000 established annual funding for the Rails to Trails Acquisition program, which also includes acquisition of lands for the Florida National Scenic Trail. In 1996, the Florida Legislature expanded the acquisition program to include greenways and trails systems. FDEP's Office of Greenways and Trails (OGT) receives $4.5 million annually. Save Our Rivers (SOR) The primary purpose for lands purchased under the SOR program, administered by Florida's five water management districts, is the protection of watersheds for natural systems, drinking water and ground water conservation. Eligible lands can contribute to protection of ecoiogical greenways and trail systems. The North Savannas, the North Fork of the SI. Lucie River projects and the Indian River LagoonBlueway projects are within the SOR five- year plan. Florida Recreation and Development Assistant Program (FRDAP) These are competitive grant programs that provide funds to acquire and development of land for public outdoor recreation. A proposed project must be for either acquisition or development of land for outdoor recreational purposes. If an acquisition project receives a FRDAP grant, the applicant must develop the acquired site for public outdoor recreation use within three years. Up to two applications during the submission period are accepted from each governmental entity,· and the maximum amount that may be requested is $200,000. . Matching requirements may be met by cash or the value of undeveloped land owned by applicant (subject to conditions) and In-kind services Grant matching ratios are as follow: Total Project, Cost FRDAP Grant, Local Match $50,000 or less, 100%, 0% $50,001 - 150,000, 75%, 25% Over $150,000, 50%, 50% 10/22/2003 Page 40 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northaastern St. Lucie County "-' .....¡ Mine Reclamation FDEP's Bureau of Mine Reclamation administers programs for the reclamation and restoration of lands mined for phosphate,. limestone, heavy materials, sand and clay (Chapters 211 and 378, Florida Statutes). For more information, contact the Department of Environmental Protection, Bureau of Mine Reclamation at (850) 488-8217. Florida Department of State's Division of Historical Resources The Division of Historical Resources provides grants to support the preservation of important historic/archaeological sites as well as the creation of historic and cultural trails. The Division can provide technical assistance and information about sites and areas that could be incorporated into greenways and trails. The National Register of Historic Places Program, administered by the National Park Service and the State Historic Preservation Officer with the Florida Department of State, Division of Historical Resources, assists local governments and nonprofit organizations in preparing nominations and provides funding for protecting historic and cultural resources through the Florida Historic Preservation Grants Program. For more information, contact the Department of State, Division of Historical Resources at 500 South Bronough Street, Tallahassee, Florida, 32399-0250, (850) 487-2333. Indian River Lagoon License Plate Proceeds from the sale of the Indian River Lagoon license plate are used to protect and restore the lagoon's habitat through the reconnection of impounded salt marshes, shoreline stabilization, spoil island and mangrove restoration, stormwater treatment and environmental education projects such as exhibits, videos and learning centers. Funds may also be used to provide public access to coastal waters. Funds allocated by County based on funds generated. Florida Coastal Management Program Financial Assistance through this program is limited to no more than $50,000 for small construction or capital improvement projects, and no more than $25,000 for all other projects. Recipients are required to provide 100%(1 to 1) match, which may be cash or in- kind. For example, match may include such items 'as cash, the salaries of employees, the value of work time of volunteers, or the value of COnstruction materials. Eligible project types include: . The Access to Coastal Resources category works with communities to identify and secure public accessways, to provide walkways and educational signage where appropriate, and to protect resources while promoting public enjoyment of coastal areas. . Remarkable Coastal Places category will help communities identify and access technical expertise, financial resources, and management tools to secure lasting protection for the resources they value. Projects may include developing conservation plans, raising awareness or resource values, or establishing long-term management structures. 10122/2003 Page 41 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern Sl. LOOe County '--' ....; The FCMP has submitted revisions to Rule 625-4 to provide for a wider range of projects to be funded by the FCMP and provide procedures for grants to state agencies and water management districts. Florida Inland Navigational District (FIND) This is a competitive grant program that provides funding assistance to local governments for waterway related projects that are located on natural, navigable waterways within the District. The District is authorized to provide up to 90% for public navigation projects while all other project categories are eligible for up to 50% funding assistance. Annually the District allocates approximately $1 million for the program. Cash, in-kind services and other grant funds may be utilized as the local match. Eligible Projects include: · Waterway Related Recreation - boat ramps, docking facilities, fishing and viewing piers, waterfront boardwalks; · Environmental Education programs and facilities; · Environmental mitigation projects as shoreline stabilization. Can include exotic removal. Florida Highway Beautification Council Grants Administered through FDOT, this grant funds local government roadway beautification projects, including park entrances. This grant could be applicable tei funding landscaping improvements along trail corridors that are along roadways. Awards vary and are ongoing. 10122/2003 paga 42 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northaastern St. Lucie County """" ...." INDIVIDUAL GROUP RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations were complied from group notes, group maps and each group's presentation to the larger group. The original notes and maps are available in the Department of Community Development. VIKING-INDRIO GROUP 1. Avalon-Indrio Ecosystem Tour - this is an interpretive tour of the ecological diversity found between the North Savannas and the Atlantic Ocean. Informational signage that depicts the four ecosystems that make up the area between the Ocean to the North Savannas should be provided. 2. The group recommended a boat tour or water taxi be provided to transport people to conservation lands on Hutchinson Island that can provide access to the beach. The boat taxi was recommended for location in the area of Harbor Branch and the Indrio Blueway Buffer Preserve. 3. The ecological diversity that is found in close proximity to all pUblic access points should be recognized. 10122/2003 Page 43 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastem 81. Lucie County ...... ""'" 4. Signage and location information about the North Hutchinson Island historic inlet should be provided on the appropriate site. The group thought that Pepper Park might be the location of the Historic Inlet. 5. Old Dixie Highway Multi-use path - includes a path between the roadway and the FEC railroad right-of-way. The path would extend between A-1-A and Indian River County. There is sufficient area between the railroad right-of-way and the roadway to provide adequate area for a trail but not large enough for development. The path would link several conservation areas along Old-Dixie Highway and provide access to future nature trails within those areas. 6. Indrio Savannas Natural Area Trailhead - utilize the Indrio North Savannas as a trailhead with restrooms and an educational building. Amphitheaters (both open & closed) should be developed on the Indrio Savannas site or the Harbor Branch site. The Indrio Savannas Natural Area contains several areas of land adjacent to its entrance road that have been degraded by past mining practices that are suitable for the proposed education facility and amphitheater. 7. An unpaved trail through the eastern side of the airport that connects the Indrio Savannas Natural Area and the Indian River Lagoon, via the C-25 Canal. East of 25th Street, St. Lucie County owns utilizes a canal for drainage purposes that extends to Basin 1, just north of the C-25. This trail could provide a link into the City of Fort Pierce. 8. North Savannas Greenway & Nature trail - extend Indrio Savannas Natural Area trails north through the proposed North Savannas conservation lands, to the canal running east and west along the county line. The group recommended that acquisition of the North Savannas lands be aggressively pursed. 9. North Boulevard Canal Trail - links Emerson Avenue to Old Dixie Highway, via the North Savannas. This trail would provide a connection to the existing Kings Highway Trail in Lakewood Park and the proposed North Savannas nature trail to provide a contiguous connection to the C-25 Canal system. 10. Seminole Road Canal Trail - extends from North Boulevard to Miramar Avenue with trail links to the IndrioRoad School house and Lakewood Park Elementary. Provides children safe passage to school and a recreational trail connected to the proposed Lakewood Regional Park. 11. An East/West connector - located between Fort Pierce Boulevard and the School to the Kings Highway Canal to allow children to bike or walk to school. Palomar Street was suggested as the roadway suitable for this trail. 12. Emerson Road Trail - Extends from the Indian River County line to Indrio Road. The trail will provide a pedestrian and bicycling access to the proposed Lakewood Regional Park. 13. The historic tree canopy on Indrio Road should be protected. The scenic road should be called the "Tree Tunnel". 10122/2003 Page 44 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern St. Lucie County ...... ...", 14. Connect pUblic lands along the lagoon and provide a canoe launch at the Indrio Blueways Buffer Preserve. Development of a canoe trail is recommended. 15. Better identification signs should be provided on all locations, including public conservation and historical sites in the area. All historic sites should be better recognize and protection. Specific sites include the Indrio Road and SI. Lucie Village School House, Viking Cemetery, UTD Seal Museum, and Tozour Road. Signage should be placed on Tozour Road that recognized it as old US Highway 1. The Viking cemetery requires better maintenance. 16. The Indrio Area should be named Indrio-Viking, to recognize the historic name of the area. 17. Recognize Tozour Road as the historic US 1. 1012212003 paga 45 Greenways & Trails Concaptual Plan Northeastem Sl. Lucia County ..... . """" TRAILBLAZERS GROUP 1. 2. 3. Trail along Old Dixie Highway trail from Indian River County to connect to North Beach via Causeway Island. Old Dixie Highway possess' picturesque scenery of the lagoon and SI. Lucie Village. This route connects to North Hutchinson Island as well as Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute and existing conservation lands. Further discuss a trail to connect the Indrio Blueway Buffer Preserve to the proposed Harbor Branch Oceanographic trails to the north. Development of a Blueway system for canoe and kayaking from the mainland to North Hutchinson Island. Connect the Indrio Blueway Buffer Preserve to the SI. Lucie Village Heritage Park and across the lagoon to Queens Island, Jack Island, Kings Island and nature trails on these sites. 4. 5. A trailhead with parking and an educational building east of US 1 at the sand mine portion of the Indrio North Savannas Natural Area. Bike path/trail along canal easements that run along North Boulevard to Old Dixie Highway and the North Savannas. Talk to Indian River County about a trail tie to their lands. 10/22/2003 Page 46 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern Sl Lucie COtJnty "'r ...., 6. Need easVwest link from Kings Highway canal trail to the SE North Savannas (Indrio Savannas). 7. Seminole road canal trail extending from North Boulevard canal right-of-ways to Miramar with a connection to the Lakewood Park Elementary School. 8. Eastwood Drive canal trail connecting Turnpike Feeder Road to North Blvd. in Lakewood Park. 9. Emerson Avenue trail from Indian River County to Indrio Road. 10. EasVwest connection - Hibiscus Road connecting the proposed park to the Lake Park Recreational Path. Kings Highway Recreational Path to Eastwood Drive with a connection to Donlan Road, which ties to Emerson & park. 11. Indrio Road trail from US Highway 1 to Emerson Avenue. 12. Existing plan for bridge over canal connecting Kings Highway Canal Trail to Lakewood Park Elementary, Fire Department & Library. 13. Ridge haven property Bicycle Motorcross (BMX) facilities and trailhead linked to western proposed trails, the Indrio Savannas and to the Old Dixie Highway trail. 14. The eastern edge of airport property was proposed for an off road trail to extend north to the Indrio Savannas Natural Area and south to North 25th Street, this may include the Capron heritage trail. 15. Southwest of Indrio Road and Kings Highway iqentify north/south connection to tie into the C-25 Canal. Identify separate pedestrian, bicycle, and equestrian trails along existing canals. Kings Highway, Emerson and Seminole Canals may be suitable. 16. Develop a trail system along the C-25 Canal right-of-way and look at canals to the south for additional connections. Provide separate bike and equestrian trails along the C-25. Canal. . 17. Connect the Zora Neal Hurs.ton Heritage Trail to the C-25 Canal trail with connections to US Highway 1 and the City of Fort Pierce. 18. 1-95 rest stop could be utilized as a trailhead to provide access to trail system along C-25 Canal. Identify a trailhead for equestrians. Identify a parking area for horse trailers to provide access to the trail system for equestrians. 19. Capron Trail - Identify its location and make connections. 20. Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute loop trail. 1012212003 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Pege 47 Northeastern St. Lucie County - " "w' ..." HILL TOP GROUP 1. 2. Develop a multi-use trail along Old Dixie Highway between A-1-A sidewalks and Indian River County. Extend the trail into Indian River County to Orchid Island and North Hutchinson Isiand to provided a looped trail. Adequate land area exists between Old Dixie Highway and the FEC Railroad right-of-way to provide a multi-use path. St. Lucie County, St. Lucie Village and Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute own a portion of the required area. The Old Dixie Highway trail would provide links to nature trails proposed on several conservation sites along Old Dixie Highway. Keep trees and vegetate to provide an attractive corridor. Utilize the St. Lucie Village School House as a Trailhead for the proposed Old Dixie Highway Trail; facilities will be accessible without entering the school. If the Village purchases adjacent lands, determined if they should be incorporated into the school site and trailhead. 3. 4. Relocate a Flagler rail car to the St. Lucie Village Heritage Preserve site to provide a historical interpretive display of the role the railroad played in the area's development. A canoe launch within the Indrio Blueway Buffer Preserve and a dock on the St. Lucie Village Heritage was proposed to provide a canoe/kayak trail, with a 10/2212003 Page 48 Greenways & Trails Conceptual Plan Northeastern St Lucie County 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. ..'" -..J 5. future expansion of th.e trail to North Hutchinson Island. The Indrio Blueway Buffer Preserve was proþos~d as the trailhead. A canoe route along the entire Indian River Lagoon should be developed. Provide safe pedestrian and bicycle crossing between US Highway 1 and Old Dixie Highway to connect the Old Dixie Highway Trail to the Indrio Savannas Natural Area. A land bridge was suggested. A second crossing is needed between the proposed Airport trails and trailhead on the west side of US Highway 1 to the Old Dixie Highway Trail. The Indrio Savannas Natural Area should be utilized as a Trailhead with full trailhead facilities including the location of facilities associated with the Harbor Branch Oceanographic Institute Dolphin and Whale Rehabilitation program. Preserve the natural areas on the east side of the airport, including the scrub areas along US 1 that is owned by SI. Lucie County (airport lands). A trail should be provided through the eastern side of the airport to the Indrio Savannas Natural Area and south to existing sidewalks and bike lanes on North 25th Street. Create an observation area on the site of the recently demolished Hill Top Restaurant, which has the highest elevation in the area to give visitors a spectacular view of the lagoon and ocean. Indrio Road trail - provide a trail from Old Dixie Highway to the Kings Highway canal trail in Lakewood Park, via Turnpike Feeder Road. Provide a trail along the Eastwood Canal that connects the Indian River County line to the Turnpike Feeder Road. Link the Kings Highway canal trail to the Lakewood Park Elementary School via Miramar and extend to the north along Seminole canal right-of-way to the proposed regional park. Connect the existing Indrio North Savannas Natural Area to Turnpike Feeder Road via the proposed North Savannas conservation lands. Create trails to accommodate various users, including hikers, paddlers, and bicyclist with the particular location of each surface determined upon the particular users needs and suitability of the land. 10/2212003 Page 49 Greenways & Trans Conceptual Plan Northeastern Sl. Lucie County ~ . \w Comprehensive Plan Directives Conservation Element Diredives: Develop II Greenway Plan to facilitate ecological and recreational greenways · Encourage multi-use of greenways · Coordinate with state and regIonal agencies to encourage connectivity between private and public recreation and ¡;onservalionlands · Pursue grants to as5emble the greenway network Recreation &: Open Space Element Directives: Provide for an integrated system ofGreenways and Trails in 51. LucieCow1ty . Finalize the Greenw<1Ys and Trails Master Plan . Seek funding from outsIde sources for the development and m;magement of Greenways and Trails Northeastern Greenways and Trails Planning Area --..... GIgenw8yt. Tmils, & Bkaways PIEnIIf'Q Map ..... "'- .6 -.-- -.--... --- ---~ .=::.:..-- --- ---- 11=-- -.--- -,..- ...,., What Is a Greenway? Gr(,o.'lIIh1ys ill~ (OHidOh vi I'lúl~d,'d Opi'1l sr.IC" th,ilareman.lgl'dJ'JI (O!l~l'n'.1fionalld r..rrè,ltinn; Grrt'IHhl}'S and Ir,lils: Provide lJature b;l~('d renc.1!ilm:md C,'n~'íf't)!lm\'ntalC,'dll(;lIíl) \; l'n.tt'cln.ltural...ultuLlIJl1d IÜ~t"ríc,ll r~ourCt's; Crc'JI\:mor<'!iVJ[¡IO' comltlunìtì\',; Con"<,ct'chuol,. con'O'rvJlíonJnJ,ü:-r<',ltion l;m,I>.rct,lilCt'ntl'rsand worl.œnll'r¡to comrnnnilk_,; rWI-id... ,11!Hdtìv('ltll'd,'> o! trau>pol1atioll. (;I'O'el1'\-,1.I''> (0111 b('riYCI,~, natull' hails, urb,\11 birrc!(' roulc~, '>C\'nic higI1l\ol)'S; Ihe}'(,\I1 Þl'wìthor wilholllpubJi(;lÙ·6';. Northeastern SLC Greenways and TraiIs Community Workshop ST. LUCI£ COIJNTY -~.ïi'sml~ . ØIX[I¥~r:¡ ~~fl.'~'fW'j III.SI1,:P f'U" -""'-- .~"- :i!: -=:,....... .~. -"'·"'1- ,-¡.....~." _""'''.,- -- -.....¡-. ::",,,,,.~ (i!):."'f'".!".... ¡ .- 1 ~ f '-"' No_1It~L>OÓOc....., ~E:::-::-"·"·- -'....- -""..,,~- :.- ~"""""=-- - ~ ----- "-'- -==-- "- ~. ~-. ...~ - -- Linking Public and Private Resources Historic TraÎls Connecting Historical Resources 51. Lude Village Hi,torie District Proposed Old Dixie Highway-Heritag. Trail Connecting the St. Lucie Village Hi.toricDi.tricttootherHistorical Public Sile. Along the JRL. ...,¡ Plan Highlights 77 miles of Trails Lakewood Park Connector Trail. - Link parks and school. . Airport Trailhead and Sports Park. - Includes BMX Track and Skate Park. Nine Multi-use Trails Five Single Purpose Trails Six Trailheads Old Dixie Highway Heritage Trail - Regionalconnector Indian River Lagoon Paddling Trail. - Develop a paddling trail program. Linking North SLC Communities to the City of Fort Pierce and North Hutchinson Island 2 '. .... Canals in the Planning Area Next Steps Form a Greenways and Trails Steering Advisory Committee (can be IlubgoUP nf¡M Rcc. AdvÍJory Bd.. willi II5Cr goop rcps.) . Prioritize Bike, Multi-use, Equestrian and Nature Trails Construct Trails on Existing County Owned Lands Seek Authorizations for the Use afCanal Rights-of- Way ....,¡ What Others Are Doing &1..",/ . .. ."., 'Ww>' .' THE END 3 "" Agënda Request ""'" Item Number Date: 6E October 28, 2003 Consent Regular Public Hearing leg. I ] I] IX] I] Quasi-JD [ ] To: Board of County Commissioners Submitted By: Community Development - TOURISM SUBJECT: M,S"Z Com evelopment Director Request for Ren'ewal of Annual Grant and Additional Funding for the Treasure Coast Sports Commission The St Lucie County Tourist Development Council (TDC) is requesting that the Board of County Commissioners approve increasing and renewing the annual allocation to the Treasure Coast Sports Commission (TCSC) from $30,000 to $35,000. This would be an additional $5,000 .over what was budgeted for as part of the TDC's FY 2003104 approved budget The additional $5,000 can be provided for through the assignment of unallocated funds from the "Aid to Private Organization" line item. The TDC is also requesting that the Board of County Commissioners grant from their Contingency Fund an additional $25,000 to the TCSC (BA04-11 0). These funds would be used towards partial funding ($15,000) for the second staff person for the Sports Commission. This additional person was essential during the 2003 and will be again in dune 2004 when hosting and staffing the Florida law Enforcement Games as well as assisting in the daily office duties that continue to enlarge with additional sporting programs. , BACKGROUND: The remaining $10,000 would be earmarked for the TCSC to utilize as bid fees to attract future sporting events. Revenue from these events has and will continue to provide significant dollars coming into the economy of St Lucie County. For the TCSC to continue to go out to solicit and sponsor new games usually requires bid fees and with these additional funds, would assist in expanding bid negotiation options. With the $25,000 funding from the Board and $35,000 from Tourism funds. the total St Lucie County contribution towards the TCSC for FY 2003/04 would be $60,000. FUNDS AVAILABLE: 611-5210·582000'500 Aid to Private Organization 001-9910-5991 00,500u _Contingency Fund. N/A . $35,000 - $25,000 PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: The Tourist Development Council and staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve an increase in the TCSC yearly Tourism grant from $30,000 to $35,000, and. to. appr.ove BA!l.4, 1.1 Q for an additional.$25,OOO to the TCSC utilizing lae_ County's Contingency Fund. Authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement prepared by the County Attorney. . COMMISSION ACTION: D APPROVED D DENIED D OTHER ouglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney ~Iß r- os M Originating Dept.: <{? Finance: Coordination/ Sig~fes J.¡¡~s Mgt & Budget: ~ Other: Purchasing: Other: "" """" COMMISSION REVIEW: October 28, 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT TOURISM MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Gayla Barwick, Tourism THRU: DATE: Dennis Murphy, Community Development Director October 28, 2003 SUBJECT: Renewal of Annual Grant and Additional Funding for the Treasure Coast Sports Commission The Tourist Development Council is requesting that the Board of County Commissioners approve their request that was unamously voted on by the Council to renew the Treasure Coast Sports Commission (TCSC) annual grant for the 2003104 budget year and to increase the grant from $30,000 to $35,000 utilizing Tourism funds. The TDC has also asked staff to again this year request approval of a $25,000 grant from the Boards Contingency Fund. $15,000 of this amount would go to partially fund a second TCSC staff person and $10,000 towards future sporting event bid fees. Figures from the TCSC for the first ten months of last year shows the Direct Economic Impact from sporting events coming into St. Lucie was $4,091,470 and the number of room nights generated during this period was 9,328. Using the above figure $4,091,470 and comparing it to our $55,000 grant, the return on investment was approximately 7,500 percent. For every grant $1.00, we received back approximately $74.39. The TDC recommends and encourages the Board to continue to support the Treasure Coast Sports Commission again this year. Attached, please find the following: Exhibit A: Financial Report (per our contract agreement, a ceiiified audited report will be furnished within 90 days) Exhibit B: Direct Economic Impact Numbers Comparison Exhibit C: Quarterly Reports from 10/1/02 to 7/31/03 Exhibit 0: Number of Room Nights Exhibit E: Future Events Bid List Exhibit F: Partial Recap of the Florida Law Enforcement Games, June 2003 Thank You. Attachments DEPARTMENT Approved Budget Administration "" FISCAL YEAR 2003.2004 FUNDS APPROVED FROM CONTINGENCY GENERAL FUND AMOUNT REMAINING: $875,000 ITEM ACCOUNT 1# Contingency 001-9910-599100-800 Chilled Water System for Thomas J. White Stadi GlL Interfund Loan ... Total used: Balance Available Proposed action: Comm. Dev-Tourism Treasure Coast Sports Comm (TCSC) Increase BA04-110 Balance Available After Proposed Action: ... Intertund Loan for the Thomas J. White Stadium Chiller System ....., AMOUNT DATE 1,000,000 $125.000 10/21/03 $125,000 $875,000 $25,000 10128/03 $850,000 BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM ..." REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: OMS FOR COMM. DEV-TOURISM PREPARED DATE: 10123103 AGENDA DATE: 10128/03 ,~~ ""I^' ,{..t'i;f.' ,,,:' r" .-' ..... '"t'.~'fr. "...,' ~>/:. , " < ,11, ,~, iI'-, 'I' .~.' ',"~"," '" . . . ~ ~ , 1':"\"1"'1. \~".J. _ ..,. ." ";:( ,_ TO: 001-5210.582000-500 Aid to Private 0 anization $25 000 FROM: 001-9910-599100-500 Contin enc Fund $25 000 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: Increase fundin for the Treasure Coast S rts Commission. These funds will be used towards rtial fundin S rts Commission and $10 000 to be utilized for bid fees to attract future s rtin events. CONTINGENCY BAlANCE: THIS AMENDMENT: REMAINING BAlANCE: $875,000 $25,000 $850,000 DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMS APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT tI: DOCUMENT tI & INPUT BY: .~~ BA04-110 .., v ...... ..." Agenda Request Item Number Date: ( ~ ßct~er 28, 2003 Consent Regular Public Presentation Leg. [ [ ] [X] [ ] Quasi·JD [ To: Submitted By: Board oi County Commissioners Community Development Director SUBJECT: Consider and adopt Resolution No. 03- rescinding curre t Resoiution No. 02- 196 regarding St. Lucie County's Ad Valorem Tax Abatemen Program On November 5, 2002, the voters in St. luce County approved a referendum authorizing the Board of County Commissioners to grant a local option economic ad valorem tax exemption. BACKGROUND: FUNDS AVAilABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: Resolution No. 03-258 will provide a structured approach to the administration and oversight of this program. Including, an application process and procedure, a revised eligibility chart and phase out schedule, and monitoring guidelines. N/A On October 6, 1992, this Board adopted Ordinance No. 92·24, which amended Chapter 1-19.3 (Taxation) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, by creating Article V - Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption. Section 1-19.3·59 (Eligibility Business or Industry) of Ordinance No. 92-24 provides for the formuiation of criteria for determining the length of an exemption and the percentage amount of an exemption pursuant to resolution 01 the Board. RECOMMENDATION: On September 3, 2002, the Board adopted Resolution No. 02·196 establishing a property tax exemption eligibility chart and phase out schedule for new or expanding business. Staff recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 03·258 rescinding current Resolution No. 02-196 and authorize the Chairman to sign Resolution 03-258. COMMISSION ACTION: c!J APPROVED D DENIED D OTHER Approved (3·1)Coward.No Bruhn-Absent . CONCURRENCE: Goordination/ Signatures County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: /I:s/ Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: '--' '..1 Commission Review Date: October 28, 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Economic Development MEMORANDUM FROM: Board of County Commissioners Dennis Murphy, Community Development Direct~ h October 7,2003 TO: DATE: SUBJECT: Consider and adopt Resolution No. 03-258 rescinding current Resolution No. 02-196 regarding St. Lucie County's Ad Valorem Tax Abatement Program On November 5; 2002,ihe voters in St Luce County approved a referendum authorizing the Board of County Commissioners to grant a local option economic ad valorem tax exemption. Resolution No. 03-258 will provide a structured approach to the administration and oversight of this program. Including, an application process and procedure, a revised eligibility chart and phase out schedule, and monitoring guidelines. On October 6, 1992, this Board adopted Ordinance No. 92-24, which amended Chapter 1-19.3 (Taxation) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, by creating Article V - Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption. Section 1-19.3-59 (Eligibility Business or Industry) of Ordinance No. 92-24 provides for the formulation of criteria for determining the length of an exemption and the percentage amount of an exemption pursuant to resolution of the Board. On September 3, 2002, the Board adopted Resolution No. 02-196 establishing a property tax exemption eligibility chart and phase out schedule for new or expanding business. Staft recommends that the Board adopt Resolution No. 03-258 rescinding current Resolution No. 02-196 and authorize the Chairman to sign Resolution 03-258. ~ '-' -~RAFT 'J RESOLUTION NO. 03 - 258 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING APPLICATION PROCEDURES AND A REVISED PROPERTY TAX EXEMPTION ELIGIBILITY CHART AND PHASE OlJT SCHEDULE FOR NEW OR EXPANDING BUSINESSES APPLYING FOR AN ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AD VALOREM TAX EXEMPTION WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. On November 5, 2002, the voters in St. Lucie County approved a referendum authorizing the Board of County Commissioners to grant a local option economic ad valorem tax exemption. 2. On October 6,1992, this Board adopted Ordinance No. 92-24, which amended Chapter 1-19.3 (TAXATION) of the Code of Ordinances of St. Lucie County, Florida, by creating Article V - Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption. Section 1-19.3-59 (Eligibility Business or Industry) of Ordinance No. 92-24 provides for the formulation of criteria for determining the length of an exemption and the percentage amount of an exemption pursuant to resolution of this Board. 3. On September 3,2002, the Board adopted Resolution No. 02-196 establishing a prop,erty tax exemption eligibility chart and phase out schedule for new or expanding businesses. 1 "" """'" 4. The Board desires to adopt new application procedures and a revised eligibility chart and phase out schedule for the County's Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board hereby adopts the application procedures and revised Property Tax Exemptions Phase Out Schedule and Property Tax Eligibility Chart, attached hereto and referred to collectively as Exhibit "A", for purposes of establishing eligibility of a tax exemption for new or expanding businesses. 2. The Board shall have the discretion to modify the eligibility requirements based on other significant factors including, but not limited to, the following: a) The increase in local employment attributable to the new or expanding business; b) The unemployment and underemployment of the available local labor force and the types and wages of jobs created, therein; c) The amount of capital investment purchased by the new òrexpanding business; d) The ability of the County to otherwise meet its total fiscal needs should the requested exemption be granted; 2 """". -.,.¡/ e) The cost of any increased local government services, including but not limited to roads, water, sewer, gas and law enforcement, and other direct expenditures associated with that specific business. 3. The Board reserves the right to require a company receiving an ad valorem tax exemption from the County to refund the exemption amount with interest in the event the company closes the facility that was the subject of the exemption within fifteen (I5) years after the Board grants the exemption. 4. Resolution No. 02-196 is rescinded upon adoption of this resolution. 5. This Resolutionshall take effect upon adoption. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Cliff Barnes XXX Vice Chairman Paula Lewis XXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXX Commissioner John Bruhn XXX Commissioner frannieHutchinson XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this _ day of , 2003. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: Deputy Clerk Chairman 3 ~ 4 -...J APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: County Attorney """ wi Exihibit "A" Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Program St. Lucie County The SI. Lucie Board of County Commissioners (~s:>pC) i~2¡iR[~~$ßd to provide the application and instructions for the Economic Devel~JR):Tient Äi:f,~~19rªrrtTax Exemptipn Program, which is designed to assist economic dª~lopment.t~röug~ie~~rrtPting c~f'lain property taxes. First, to help determine if you qu, . unde,,J3ì.th'is inceQti¥e,~J8gra,\"I' you should read Section IV, "Do You Qualify for a T xe .tlon". "'1''''<:)':1); ""\,:':7" ,:..Jc ~ ,;:,;;¡; eligibility, or regarding the ,Development Analyst, at If you have any questions about this program, application process, please contact Victoria Stall. (772) 462-2536.',,· I. Program Intent II. Enactment Authority III. Definition of Terms IV. Qua,lJfication fo ¡¿;r!f~:t' "You Qualify for a Tax Exemption" V. VI. VII. Attachments .' . A. ,d~;~::;;t~:H : .fLY ;¡;ò'" %if Stat~.i¡t\iþplication County Supplemental Application, Annual Report Forrñ~· . ::\~ ,""<':',;,:',.." '<.>:.:-"'" ·'B. . 'Économic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Ordinances: Ordinance #92-24 C. Section 196.195 F.S. and Section 196.012 Subsections (15) and (16) F.S. D. St. Lucie County Tax Exemption Guidelines 1 '--' wi I. Proqram Intent The SI. Lucie Board of County Commission, in Florida believes that local government should support economic growth by providing an incentive for County employment opportunities that will lead to the improvement in the quality of life for County residents, positive expansion of the economy in terms of new jobs and improver¡-ìØnts to real and personal property, and creating jobs in such a way so as not to/disadvantage existing businesses while recognizing that productive competitiqn fostersecql1\CI,mic growth. The Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Ex~~ption;lc~a local (¡,;inCentive for new or expanding businesses, which may bè!'Qì'~@t~d at the sole:J ,fion of the Board of County Commissioners. Incentives CoUld~Þ~i[Ri~~ided to businesses of diverse industries that would have a positive impact on the,ßqÎAIJ!,~~'economy. "'>,.,', -_:(:~ ò-~_'~;~-s_';~- Any exemption granted may apply up to one ;\undred p~r~~nt(109%) of the assessed value per Section 9 and Section 12 of Artic:J!;!iiN"JI" ",the Florìda¡State Constitution, of all improvements to real property made ~"yff(¡wW '~f se of a hew business and of all tangible personal property of such neW businii. ne hundred (100%) of the assessed value of all added imp,ç,dvement,~f¡fto . erty made to facilitate the expansion of an existing busin~s"f and pf,;the ne ease in all tangible personal property acquired to facilitate s"p~tr}'expan~ion of ar:¡,i¡ xisting business, provided that the improvements to real propertMitßre mad¡:¡",ior thet¡;¡ligible personal property is added or increased after the date~f t~~ prelimj[1~r)'¡.¡;I,P~I,ic:âtion or one year prior to the filing of the final,;a,~e.lication.iìipE;lrty acqlÌirE;ld¡,~tClc¡!!tieplace existing property may not be considere,~è'¥¡tq?:facilitat "'. . '. " ¡ness expansion. The exemptions may not apply to improvem$,~~:'It,l'!m~~al prö, ",ª?e by or for the use of new or expanding businesses when suchi t'Ä~f:8~êrnents ha ; "..Jl included on the tax rolls prior to the preliminary application orgn~~~~~~rior t )ling of the final application. ,_'j>'c,< .. '.- ," ;;::;:::.?h:!c3f+t The ability to receiV:~~n?:¡'I:!~~mption for the period granted is conditioned upon the appliqáht's ability to niª¡i!lt~¡('Í;the new business -ortheexpansion of an existing business aSd~ined in Sectioii!iIlHE. and H. throughout the entire exemption .period. The applicant will be regl'Jired to submit a report on an annual basis to the County e"idi¡mcing satisfactibh of this condition. The annual report shall be submitted on the attåqf:¡l:!d form.d!i"addition, any business granted an exemption will furnish to the CoU~.tiI:8r,¡t~,¡(:f~signee such information as the County or its designee may reasonably reqYi!~;f8r~the purpose of determining continued performance by the business of the condmanŠ stated in the exemption ordinance and the representations made in the application. 2 ~ ..." II. Enactment Authoritv Article VII, Section 3 of the Constitution of the State of Florida and Section 196.1995 Florida Statutes, empower the County to grant Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions after the electors of the County, voting on the question in"a referendum, authorize such exemptions. In a referendum held on this issue on Novémber 5, 2002, the voters of St. Lucie County authorized the County to grant~tcq80h1ic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemptions. This exemption progrª-I'!').js appl¡ç?~lein all areas of St. Lucie County where the County is the taxing autho~iwf,ii¢ ~;1in'!,,; 'Y, ., ",if/ The exemption applies only to taxes levied by St.[jµµcie cour~~. wh~fe·,tti~,!ç()U8tY,1~ the taxing authority. The exemption does not apply tP'tax~~nevied by the sc~ool'dìstrict or water management district, fire district or to taxesj! ," 'by the voters for the payment of bonds or other special taxes authorized by a vc,¡L e~!!3ctors pursuant to Section 9 and Section 12. Article VII, of the Florida State,(1fóns ,ion',L'¡·ò. ~""-' <7·" ". .... .... The Ordinance (Ordinance No. 92-24) th~tiltf·?j;, ents théWt~.åbatement program is entitled "Economic Development Ad V~19rem" emptiqþ'¡()rdinance of St. Lucie County, Florida". Resolution No.4~'ò3-25 §ðdditional guidelines for implementation of the Ad Valorem T .' Exemetion P' L;.. 3 "-' wi III. Definition of Terms The following words, phrases, and terms shall have the same meanings attributed to them in current Florida Statutes and the Florida Administrative Code, except where the context clearly indicates otherwise: Applicant - Any person, firm, partners~ip, or c¡< . application with the St. Lucie Board of.C.9ynty e~ economic development ad valorem ta¡ç;exemption. Æd)Y "':<, <J/ B. Business - Any activity engaged~~~, by am¥'!'þerson;i:!iQ¡"tpà.rtnership, corporation, or other Business or~~j~ticm or entity, wítl1l,.the object of private or public gain, benefit, or advar1télge'ij~ither direct or indirect. , \'åtfòn that files an Go! 'oners seeking an A. 1. ,tii¡~,si C. Countv - St. Lucie County. D. Department - The Florida 011 '-j' E. , lorida Statutes, an Expansion ~5);/,_,,> A!íiÙSiness~r~~ ten (10) or more jobs to employ ten 'Q) or mg' ",' . Ime employees in this State, which ""tlufactu(š r processes, compounds, fabricates, or s for sale items of tangible personal property at a I .... ",éltion and which comprises an industrial or máhY"'c1i,J tiring plant; .1:i; ny business establishing twenty-five (25) or more jobs to roploy twenty"five(25) or more full-time employees in' this State, whose Sales Factor, as defined by Sectioa..220, 15(5), Florida Statutes, for the facility with respect to which it requests an economic development ad valorem tax exemption is less than 0.50 for each year the exemption is claimed; or (c) Any business located in an Enterprise Zone that increases operations on a site collocated with a commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business. 2. Any expansion of an existing business must increase operations on a site collocated with a commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business, resulting in a net increase in employment of not 4 --- ...",¡ less than ten percent (10%) or an increase in productive output of not less than ten percent (10%). The ten percent (10%) requirement does not apply to Enterprise Zones. F. Extraordinary as determined bv SI. Lucie Board of County Commissioners. G. Improvements - Physical changes rTlade to placed on or under the land surface. ¡iêt~; ¡~tt~i New Business - As defined in sedtion 199;012(15), new business means: F;~:~<;:'>' ..~,>;.<..,. , and structures H. a 1. A Business establishing ten q,ÓY9rr'1'l0re, jobs to employ ten (10) or more full-time employees,j¡în this¡¡<ptate, which manufactures, processes, compounds,. fabricates, orprodPges for sale items of tangible personal prop~~~~'!;fixed loèati9-d;!ånd which comprises an industrial or manufa'cturìí'!' , t; or . .,,;~~.~.,.. ;:.4 -. .;< '1;:' - 2. Any business Ew;tåblishi99"tw,~fi~¡.(25) or more jobs to employ twenty-five (gp§' or mQç~{ full-tirt¡'Ø'erhployees in this State, whose Sales FactAr:,ias def!9ød by Seçtion 220.15(5), Florida Statutes, for the facili1Y¡'with fªspect .t~*which it requests an economic deve! ~ent ad vel' ..:~)exemption is less than 0.50 for each ye Ii xemptimed; or çe in this State owned and used by a corporation ., ,in this State; provided such office space houses '. full-time employees of such corporation; or ss located in an Enterprise Zone (pursuant to Section : Florida Statutes). 5. Any new business must first begin operation on a site clearly ,šeparate from any other commercial or industrial operation owned ~;¡'¡B:;by the same Business. /; ;Propertv within a Community Redevelopment Area (CRA) - Any property located within a CRA created pursuant to Section 163.330, et.seg. Florida Statutes where a portion of the County tax revenue will go directly to the CRA. J. Real Property - Shall be defined in Section 192.001, Florida Statutes. 5 ~ -' K. Sales Factor - As defined in Section 220.15.(5), Florida Statutes, the sales factor is a fraction, the numerator of which is the total sales of the taxpayer in this State during the taxable year or period and the denominator of which is the total sales of the taxpayer everywhere during the taxable year or period. L. State - State of Florida. M. Tanqible Personal Prooertv - Florida Statutes. 6 1 "-' .-J IV. Qualification for Tax Exemption "Do You Qualifv for a Tax Exemption" Before completing an application, please read the following eligibility requirements that determine whether you qualify for a tax exemption under the "Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption ordinance of St. Lucie County, Florida" (Ordinance No. 92- 2~, '. A. Ad valorem tax exemptions apply to nªW!1)usin~s~~189ating to St. Lucie County and to expansion of businE' .~~es alreagy·0.sijOa.tE'!d in St. LlIcie County. . .. ..... . "'¡Y. .¡l] B. industries with the New or expanding businesses mu!!i economy of St. Lucie County in ter' real and personal property. :; :,:.:', ,i'>:;:;,~it'",ii;I~;:~;ðf;;~US;;:(; ~ 'a positive coritriþDtiol1 to the .. ew jobs and imp'¡'ôvements to C. Incentives are applicable to bu . esses exception of retail operations., . ·',::r;'\ )~¡~,'Yv " Any and all exemptionssrã'nted.tiP Co~nty, i.e., exempti9~$' woulgrj1:Sup businesses. ,.~t ii.'¥!' ;:~;i~~; _~,~j~; 0.1,t'! ... erson'i~tíim, partnership, or other Business "¡'t of private or public gain, benefit, or D. i~'l!Ïn economic benefit to the 'Ucie County and its existing E. 196.012.(15), Florida Statutes, a new meet the following criteria: !:Jusinessestablishing ten (10) or more jobs to employ ten ]'](10) or more full-time employees in this State, which manufactures, processes, compounds, fabricates, or produces for sale items of tangible personal property at a fixed location and which comprises an.. industrial or manufacturing plant; or (b) Any business establishing twenty-five (25) or more jobs to employ twenty-five (25) or more full-time employees in this State, whose Sales Factor, as defined by Section 220.15(5), Florida Statutes, for the facility with respect to which it requests an economic development ad valorem tax exemption is less than 0.50 for each year the exemption is claimed; or 7 ~ -' (c) An office space in this State owned and used by a corporation newly domiciled in this State; provided such office space houses fifty (50) or more full-time employees of such corporation; or (d) A Business located in an Enterpri:;¡~~ 2:one (pursuant to . Section 290.0065, Floridaiß~atutes).?> . (e) Any new business mus~irst begir)'ppe'; separate from any ot~~( comr]l~rCial orin owned by the same bLÍ~i . ss, . n,a site clearly us/rial operation ;~'iJr:,1~;'> ' (a) A business,. tablis'f more jobs to employ ten (10) or ~¡!Tí'ore fut~ti ees in this State, which manu!ª,çtl.Jres,~¡'oces . ,. ,compounds, fabricates, or prodg~¡¡s for. "'je itemª,'fbf tangible personal property at a fi . "Iocati and .~'nich comprises an industrial or . m Ufactur fjr' ~ªtutes, an Expansion '~~. criteria: G. Expansion of an Existing Business 1. As defined in Section 196 of an Existing Busines§< busine ablishing twenty-five (25) or more jobs to ~¥p,twenty-five (25) or more full-time employees in this 1!Mihose Sales Factor, as defined by Section 220,15(5) 'tatutes, for the facility with respect to which it requ s an economic development ad valorem tax ¡;¡mption is less than 0.50 for each ¥ear the exemption is 'imed; or Any business located in an enterprise zone that increases operations on a site collocated within commercial or industrial operation owned byJhe same business. Any expansion of an existing business must increase operations on a site collocated with a commercial or industrial operation owned by the same business, resulting in a net increase in employment of not less than ten percent (10%) or an increase in productive output of not less than ten percent (10%). The ten percent (10%) requirement does not apply to Enterprises Zones. 8 ',-, '-' H. The exemptions shall not accrue to improvements to real property made by or for the use of new or expanding businesses when such improvements have been included on the tax rolls prior to the preliminary application or one year prior to the filing of the final application. I. Property acquired to replace existing property facilitate a business expansion. not þe considered to J. No exemption shall be granted for th businesses are to be located. ~ ;1;;0'1 ;liy!" K. The ability to receive an exemptio upon the applicant's ability to maint of an existing business throughout t \,period grante ew business or ·od. L. Any existing business in violatio regulation governing envirq exemption. ate, or local law or ot eligible for an 9 "-" ...J V. Application for Exemption A. Any eligible person, firm, partnership, or corporation, which desires an exemption, must file with the County's Economic Development Division, an application prescribed by the State Department (FormiDR-418. and County Supplemental application. B. The application requests that the Cou~ty;¡;dopt an\or(jinance granting the applicant the exemption and includes,j~t'å minimurn'¡!hefollowing: 1':;1'" <w 1. The name and location of th existing business; ifLbj w bus.iness or the expansion of an , . >::'~' 2. h~ real property for which an Je :.,of commencement of j;¡timå;t¡:¡d completion date; ""'-':' .':';0 3. A description of J~~;'itå exemption is reqyEisted a to be purchaseq,~ 4. expansion of an existing total number of employees and new employees; xpe d number of employees who will reside in SI. Lucie ynty; verage wage of employees (excluding the top~xecutive's salary); (d) _ type of Industry or business; (e) environmental impact of business; (f) anticipated volume of business or production; (g) whether relocation or expansion would occur without the exemption; (h) cost and demand for services; 10 "-' -' (i) (j) source and supplies (local or otherwise); whether business will be/is located in a community redevelopment area; 6. . Other i~formation deemed necessary by StFl.tì8¡~,County. ^-;;i!FE&:- C. If a new Business or an Expansion 0 Community Redevelopment Area, t shall be provided with a copy of th Input from the Community Redev deciding whether an application is t Redevelopment Board object to t,h!. agency may submit an objectiQtY in consideration. is locatingih a . ment.~òard Ömment 11 """ -' VI. Exemption Application Process The "fully completed" Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption final application must be filed with the St. Lucie County, Economic D~veloprnênt Division, by a representative of the company. The threshold for ~ligibilitYisr'þether the Business meets the definition of a new business or of an eXp~Ì'I,sion ofl:l.nexi,stiilg business as defined in Section III, and one which is not an ineligibteBusinessoriríâ4stry. . .... ,k';:'?,,'" ':\_:'!:::_:;_:!_ii;Úr;ili~h<___<: The County will take action on the final applic?Jion, including the 'en~ftt:t)~ntof the required ordinance should the County decide to ~rl'le exemption, wI:\ÞiQ('ríÎnety (90) days from the date that a fully completed final appl . is accepted. DUring this 90· day period, interested agencies and parties will"If. ªìl,ppportunity to review and comment on the application. To impact the Nove,tnber".bt!l;:'itþe final application must be submitted by March 151 of the same year. Toe following st~þscprovide the applicant a reasonable understanding of St. Lucie COlJPt .' . omic Dèv~l()pment Ad Valorem Tax Exemption process and requirements.,y"" . . 'c,c' <;:;~tf- " :F' Step 1: Preliminary Application~'Subml : recommended that anyone contemplating whether to file a'emptiqj"t"applica ... ust first contact the County's Economic Development DivisiO d re est a m ~tìng to assess the feasibility of filing an exemption application ª acq ass is "i:e in completing the preliminary application. iminar lication to the Count : On behalf of the he company will submit one original of the State J application, a one·page narrative describing the . ·s. The applicant will also submit a map identifying e subject property with legal description. Ste3: Preliminar It andCount Commission Resolution: The County Econömic Developmá ¡tf!(!jffice will accept and review the application for-i3reliminary eli~ibility. The Eco~JniC Development Division will review and notify the applicant of eligil:¡ility and/or any}application deficiencies within thirty (30) days of submission. ;n'._ Step4¡Preparatlon of the Final Application: Upon receipt of the final application, the Count.yT$'!ipònomic Development Division will: (1) determine eligibility; (2) request the Property Appraiser to conduct its analysis; (3) conduct an economic impact analysis; and (4) advertise for a public hearing to consider adopting an exemption ordinance on behalf of the business. Step 5: Review. Analvsis and Recommendation of the Property Appraiser and EDD: Within a 90-day period, copies of the application are to be reviewed by the St. Lucie County Property Appraiser's Office and St. Lucie County staff. Any legal issue 12 "-' -' will be referred to the County Attorney's Office for review and comment. The Property Appraiser will review the application and provide in writing the fiscal impact of granting the exemption, sign the State application, and forward to St. Lucie County Economic Development Division's Office. As required by Florida Statute the Property Appraiser's report will include the following: 4. 1. The total revenue available to th~,¡¡¡¡.ounty forthé'current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources qrån'estimate(",f~uc/'¡revenue if the actual total available revenuecånnot begeterm¡r~ed;;~f;;;;' 2. The amount of revenue lost fo.th by virtue of exemptions prevfôl.Ís revenue if the actual revenue 1.0 0;<'-.--.<> "' '":;.<;t>è ,,' -'F-;y:<_,_~ìA;: <, . unty for the curre:hffrscal year nted, or an estiìn·ate of such otþe determined. 3. <~~~~;" ;:::;I·n:§y'._, An estimate of the amountof reven .......hiqÞ.would be lost to the County for the current,' ~ar if thèlêJ(emption applied far was granted had the pr.Qpej;~Þ.¡ch the';exemption is requested otherwise been subj'è'ct to .tiô;·; do'· ;....'...:/... ".."....;.... .--....'............... . ."'.- - > . _~"., -1.,:,,- ". :_ " A determina . .Was to whether th.êk ròperty for which an exemption requested . 0 be corporatèd into the new business or the expansio..;f an xisting.~rt:¡jusiness, or into neither, which determir1~tion the.e~·~ppraiser shall also affix to the face .of thepÚcation.t~![i!quest, the Department will provide the pa ··ppraise eh information as it may have available to ass I . .. Îqg this determination. {:;\ê;.._ cpy of the application. The EDD staff will canduct rward its camments to the Caunty Administratar. ;:~:' (:.- Ste .;\.6: Pre aratio.. .'. e Exem tion Ordinance: The Economic Development Divj~¡pn will forward .\IW fì1è Caunty Attorney's Office for preparatian of the-Ordinance al1cJ;*for scheduling t~~ exemption application and .ordinance, including the repart fram t~\$roperty Appr~i~êr, the economic impact analysis from the Economic Development Øi~i~i~R' and t!:!~jtCounty staff recommendation to be cansidered by the St. Lucie . C01!'rlì$!.'Soª,I\Ø!!(¡¡f¡iCommissioners. <-'.~':",-..,- --» Afterd5nsideratian .of the application and the report of the Property Appraiser on the application, the County may chaose ta adopt an ordinance granting the exemptian ta a new or expanding business. If granted, the .ordinance shall include the following infarmation: 1. The name and address of the new business or expansion .of an existing business; 13 ~ ....¡ 2. The total amount of revenue available to the County from ad valorem tax sources for the current fiscal year, the total amount of the revenue lost to the County for the current fiscal year by virtue of exemptions currently in effect, and the estima!e<;j, amount of revenue attributable to the exemption granted..,#B the new or expanding business. .,., Note: Thes, e'¡J~ .- -'id,' the Boardi&J County 3Y':!:.c. ';.l?_-~'i,¥: 3. The expiration date of the e~,pption, whif; (10) years or less (dependirig;on thedôratr granted) from the date theQ,unty ~!1âcts the the exemption; and 4. efinition of a new business S;~s set forth in Section III. Ste 7: The Guidelines for Determinin attached Program Guidelines for point.~î!iÎô and investment. .:"~,,¿,, Then go to attachment Chart A the tax exemption percentage B is for property located withi!:t; 1tt~:@ :~ 'e tax exemption on both Real Property . perty located within a CRA area will have a h exemption is determined on an individual case basis by . F:;:;' .$f:~ 14 ........ -' VII. Contact Source for Assistance Exemption applications are available at the County's Economic Development Division in the County Office on 2300 Virginia Avenue, Fort Pierce. Inquiries on the tax exemption program will be handled by this County Division. However, the Property Appraiser's Office will handle inquiries that pertain to Property Appraiser infO~!T1atioo'only. An applicant/agent who is trying to determine the viability çf filing '.. if&ation should contact St. Lucie County Economic Development Divi!l!Ìon. -,'<';¡; St. Lucie County Economic Development Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 (772) 462-1550 phone (772) 462-1579 facsimile Larry Daum, Economic Development Victoria Stalls, Economic 15 '-' -' St Lucie County Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Program Program Guidelines AdjuSJ1$ênt Considerati or c.ömpany documenta ke.J'"~usinesses of that: ona çase-by-case ba$.tsf New or Existinl! Business - Number of iobs created 25-49 50-99 100-199 200+ Note: Existing business must be a minimum of 10% in Averal!e Hourlv Wal!e Rate for New EmpIovees Less than $12.00 per hour 90% of average - $I2.00 per hour Average - $13.34 per hour 25% above the average - $16.68 per hour 50% above the average - $20.00 per hOllfJ 100% above the average - $26.68 pe .;'k r Points 2 4 6 he 5t Lucie County Commissioners may consider an individual n dicating that the business is going to be critical to attracting other us try cluster; in those incidences, program guidelines may be adjusted ,.,',...., ....~., ~:-?;.:.-;;;-'y;';"~- TI1eS~.arê0g~itîèlines only. Each exemption is detennined on an individual case basis by the Board 'cif Côunty Commissioners. Revised 1 0/22/03 16 ~ .."j St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Application Ordinance No. 92-24, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances Chapter 196, Florida Statues To be filed with the Board of County Commissioners, Economic Development Division of St. Lucie County, Florida, no later than March I of the year the exemption is desired to take effect. Please attach additional information, if necessary or requested. I. Business Name: Mailing Address: city/zip 2. Name of person in charge or owner of Business: Telephone No.: (_) Fax No.: (_) 3. Location of Business (legal description and street address) of property for which this report is filed: 4. Date Business opened or will open at this facility: 5. a. Description of the improvements to real property for which this exemption is requested: b. Date of commencement of construction of improvements: 6. a. Description of the tangible personal property for which this exemption is requested and date when property was, or is to be, purchased: Original Taxpayer's Taxpayer's Appraiser's Date of Estimate Age Purchase Value of Condition Estimate of Use Only Class or Item Cost Fair Market r- Good Avg. Poor Condition . 1 '-' -' b. Average Value of Inventory on hand: c. Any additional person property not listed above for which an exemption is claimed must be returned on form DR-405 (Tangible Personal Property Tax Return) and a copy attached to this form. 7. Do you desire an exemption as a: "New Business" [ ] or as an "Exemption of an Existing Business" [ ] 8. Describe the Type or Nature of Your Business: 9. Trade Level (check as many as apply): [] Wholesale [ ] Manufacturing [] Professional [ ] Office [ ] Service [ ] Other IO. a. Number of new full-time employees to be employed in St. Lucie County, Florida: b. If expansion of an existing business: (I) Net increase in employment (2) Increase in productive output resulting from this expansion (3) Number of St. Lucie County residents employed by Business c. Average hourly wage I I. Sales factor for the facility requesting exemption: Total sales in Florida from this facility - one (I) location only Everywhere from this facility - one (I) location only di vided by total sales = 12. For office space owned and used by a corporation newly domiciled in the state of Florida: Date of incorporation in Florida: a. Number of full-time employees at this location: 13. If requesting an exemption due to location in a slum or blighted area, please furnish such additional information as required by the Board of County Commission or Property Appraiser. I hereby request the adoption of an ordinance granting an exemption from ad valorem taxation on the above property pursuant to Section I96.I995, Florida Statues. I agree to furnish such other reasonable information as the Board of County Commissioners or the Property Appraiser may request in regard to the exemption requested herein. I hereby certify that the information and valuation stated above by me is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. (If prepared by someone other than the taxpayer, his declaration is based on all information of which he has any knowledge.) DATE: SIGNED: (Preparer) SIGNED: (Taxpayer) (Preparer) TITLE: (Preparer's Telephone Number) 2 "-' .J PROPERTY APPRAISER'S USE ONLY 1. Total revenue available to the county or municipality for the current fiscal year from ad valorem tax sources: 2. Revenue lost to the County or municipality for the current fiscal year by virtue of exemptions previously granted under this section: 3. Estimate of the revenue which would be lost to the County or municipality duringlhe current fiscal year if the exemption applied for were granted had the property for which the exemption is requested otherwise subject to taxation: 4. Estimate of the taxable value lost to the County if the exemption applied for were granted: Improvements to real property: Tangible Personal Property: 5. I have determined that the property listed above meets the definition, as defined in Section 196.0I2 (15) or (16), Florida Statues, as a New Business [ ], as an Expansion of an Existing Business [ ], or Neither [ ]. 6. Last year for which exemption my be applied: DATE: SIGNED: (Property Appraiser) RETURN TO BE FILED NO LATER THAN MARCH 1 10·07·03 . H:\ECONOMIaADV ALOREM\APPLICA TION 3 '-' 'WIt St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Ordinance No. 92-24, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances Chapter 196, Florida Statues SUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION I Applicant Name: NOTICE: This supplement is to be used by the Applicant to provide additional information required by the Economic Development Tax Abatement Ordinance 03-258, Board of County Commissioners, St. Lucie County, Florida; and to provide other information requested by the Board of County Commissioners and the entities that will review the application. Please provide a one page narrative describing the company and the relocation/expansion plans. I. Length of exemption requested is a total of years (length of exemption approved is sole discretion of the Board of County Commissioners and commences on the adoption date of the ordinance granting the exemption). 2. Property Owner Name: Address: Telephone No.: (_) 3. Authorized Agent: Address: city/zip Fax No.: C-) city/zip Telephone No.: C-) Fax No.: (_) 4. Type of Industry or Business: 5. Anticipated new capital investment as a result of expansion or relocation of Business: New construction: New tangible personal property: 6. Environmental impact of Business. (Identify the number of and type of environmental permits required as a result of this project: e.g. air, soil and water pollution, water and sewer, dredge and fill, stormwater, industrial waterway): 7. This relocation or expansion would not occur without the exemption: Yes [ ] 8. Source of supplies (local or otherwise): % source of supplies County: % source of supplies Florida: % source of supplies out-of-State: 9. Business is/will be located in a community redevelopment area: Yes [J No [ ] Name of area: No [ ] I ....... 'wi I hereby confinn the infonnation provided by to the Board of County Commissioners, Economic Development Division, St. Lucie County, Florida, for the purpose of calculating the economic impact and benefit of the proposed tax abatement is true, accurate and complete. I further confinn that is not in violation of any federal, State or local law, or regulation governing environmental matters: DATE: SIGNED: (Preparer) SIGNED: (Taxpayer) (Pre parer) TITLE: (Preparer's Telephone Number) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION (EDD) USE ONLY EDD Economic Impact Analysis: Staff's recommendation: Date: Signed: (print name and title) 10·07-03· H,\ECONOMIC\ADVALOREMlSUPPLEMENTAL APPLICATION 2 '-' ..., St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Ordinance No. 92·24, St. Lucie County Code of Ordinances Chapter 196, Florida Statues ANNUAL REPORT I Applicant Name: I As required by the Economic Development Ad Valorem Tax Exemption Ordinance 03·258, Board of County Commissioners St. Lucie County, Florida, this form is to be filed with the Board of County Commissioners no later than January 31 of each year the exemption is desired. 1. Business Name: Mailing Address: city/zip 2. Name of person in charge or owner of Business: Telephone No.~ (~) Fax No.: ~) 3. Location of Business (legal description and street address) of property for which this report is filed: 4. Date Business opened at this facility: 5. a. Description of the improvements to real property for which this exemption is requested: b. Date of commencement of construction of improvements: 6. a. Description of the tangible personal property for which this exemption is requested and date when property was purchased: (Provide this information on State form DR·405 (Tangible Personal Property) b. Average Value ofInventory on hand: 7. Have you maintained the definition of a "New Business" [ ] or an "Exemption of an Existing Business" [ ] [ ] Yes [] No 8. Describe the Type or Nature of YOur Business: 9. Trade Level (check as many as apply): [] Wholesale [ ] Manufacturing [] Professional [ ] Office [ ] Service [ ] Other 10. a. Number of new full-time employees employed in St. Lucie County. Florida: (1) Increase in productive output resulting from this expansion % (2) Number of St. Lucie County residents employed (3) Total number of hours worked during calendar year of exemption .. ~ (4) Total gross wages paid during calendar year of exemption (less the top executive's salary) (5) Number of employees prior to filing for an exemption II. Sales factor for the facility requesting exemption: Total sales in F]orida from this facility - one (I) location only divided by total sales Everywhere from this facility - one (I) location only = 12. For office space owned and used by a corporation newly domiciled in the state of Florida: a. Date of incorporation in Florida: b. Number of full-time employees at this location: 13. If requesting an exemption due to location in a slum or blighted area, please furnish such additional infonnation as required by the Board of County Commission or Property Appraiser. I agree to furnish such other reasonable infonnation as the Board of County Commissioners, St. Lucie County, Florida, may request in regard to the exemption. I hereby certify that the infonnation and valuation stated by the above by me is true, correct, and complete to the best of my knowledge and belief. (If prepared by someone other than the taxpayer, his declaration is based on all infonnation for which he has any knowledge.) DATE: _SIGNED: (Preparer) SIGNED: (Taxpayer) (Preparer) TITLE: (Preparer's Telephone Number) PROPERTY APPRAISER'S USE ONLY I. Estimate of the revenue which will be lost to the County during the current fiscal year had the exempt property otherwise been subject to taxation: 2. Estimate of the taxable value lost to the County: Improvements to real property: Tangible Personal Property: DATE: SIGNED: (Property Appraiser) ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT DIVISION (EDD) USE ONLY Total number of employees: Current hourly wage: RETURN TO BE FILED NO LATER THAN JANUARY 3I 10·07·03· H,IECONOMIOADVALOREMIAPPLICATION 2 ...... '-' Agenda Request Item Number: Meetln!! Date: [¡¡~ Oct. 28, 2003 Consent Regular Public Hearing leg. [ ] [ ] [X] [ ] Quasi·JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development y ent Director SUBJECT: Consider making appointments to the Citizen Steering Committee for the North County Planning Charrette BACKGROUND: As the Board is aware, in January 2004, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council will be holding a General Planning Charrette for the north county area. As part of the pre.- planning/ program development activities for this Charrette, Q project steering committee needs to be formed. This Steering Committee should be from nine (g) to eleven (11) members and should be made up of interested citizens of the area, interested land owners of the area, and other effected interest groups. By way of suggestion, the following list represents what staff believes would be cross- section of the community for developing this planning program: 1.) Representative of thelakewood Park Property Owners 2.) Representative of the Spanish lakes Communities (Fairways & Country Club Village) 3.) Representative of the Holiday Pines Property Owners 4.) Representative of the local agricultural industry 5.) Representative of the land holders/owners in the area west of Emerson Avenue 6.) Representative of the Ft. Pierce Farms Drainage Control District 7.) Representative of the. Local Conservation Interest Groups 8.) Representative of the Board of County Commissioners 9.) Representative of the Planning & Zoning Commission 10.) At large community representative 11.) At large community representative .. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: NIA NlA In order that we may move forward on this praject. Staff request that the Board provide appointments to this Steering Committee. as .soon ClS_ possible. If those appointments can be made by the end of October that would greatly be appreciated. COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED D OTHER CONCURRENCE: D DENIED Comm Coward Appointment Chosen Approved (3·1) Bruhn-Absent, Hutchinson-No q,...-------- Coordination! Signatures v<L)( Mgt. & Budget: Other: \J-^"tv'þ Purchasing: Other: County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: (agend741 a) ~ -' COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM '-:0: County Commission FROM: Community Development Director DATE: October 17, 2003 SUBJECT: Citizen Steering Committee for the North County Planning Charrette As the Board is aware, in January 2004, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council will be holding a General Planning Charrette for the north county area. As part of the pre- planning/ program development activities for this Charrette, a project steering committee needs to be formed. This Steering Committee should be from nine (9) to eleven (11) members and should be made up of interested citizens of the area, interested land owners of the area, and other effected interest groups. By way of suggestion, the following list represents what staff believes would be cross- section of the community for developing this planning program: 1.) Representative of the Lakewood Park Property Owners 2.) Representative of the Spanish Lakes Communities (Fairways & Country Club Village) 3.) Representative of the Holiday Pines Property Owners 4.) Representative of the local agricultural industry " 5.) Representative of the land holders/owners in the area west of Emerson Avenue 6.) Representative of the Ft. Pierce Farms Drainage Control District 7.) Representative of the Local Conservation Interest Groups 8.) Representative of the Board of County Commissioners 9.) Representative of the Planning & Zoning Commission 10.) At large community representative 11.) At large community representative In order that we may move forward on this project, I need the Board to provide appointments to this Steering Committee as soon as possible. If those appointments can be made by the end of October that would greatly be appreciated. ~. October 20, 2003 Page 5 If you have any questions about this, please let me know Submitted: t Director DJM TCRP'-NORTHCOlJNTYSTUDY1(H) cc: County Administrator County Attorney Planning Manager Michael Busha, TCRPC '...., Subject: North County Planning Charrette t " """ Agenda Request Item Number: Meeting Date: (&ft- Oct. 28, 2003 SUBJECT: Consider making appointments to the Citizen Steering Committee for the North Coiunty Planning Charrette Consent Regular Public Hearing Le [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development Am BACKGROUND: As the Boord is aware, in January 2004, the Tre4SUre Coast Regional Pianning Council will be holding a General Planning Charrette for the north county area. AS part of the pre- pJanning/ program development activities for this Charrette, Q project steering committee needs to be formed. This Steering Committee should be from nine (g) to eleven (11) members and should be made up of interested citizens of the area, interested Io.nd owners of the area, and other effected interest groups. By way of suggestion, the following list represents what staff believes would be cross- section of the community for developing tnis planning program: 1.) Representotive of the Lakewood Park Property Owners 2.) Representative of the Spanish Lakes Communities (Fairwoys & Country Club Village) 3.) Representative of the Holiday Pines Property Owners 4.) Representative of the local agriculturol industry 5.) Representative of the land holderslowners in the area west of Emerson Avenue 6.) Representative of the Ft. Pierce Farms Drainage Control District 7.) Representative of thè Local Conservation Inte.rest Groups 8.) Representative of the Board of County Commissioners g.) Representative of the Planning & Zoning Commission 10.) At large community representative 11.) At large community representative. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: N/A N/A In order thot we may move forward on this project, Staff request that the Boord provide appointme:nts_ to - this_Steering -Committu_GS_ sac,,__ os-possible. If- those appaintments can be made by November 15, 2003 that would greatly be appreciated. COMMISSION ACTION: D APPROVED D OTHER CONCURRENCE: D DENIED Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: 'ìtJ.r 64' It Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: (agend741a) ~ "". -....I COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission Community Development Director "d /1:N. 00\iIi( FROM: DATE: October 17, 2003 SUBJECT: Citizen Steering Committee for the North County Planning Charrette As the Board is aware, in January 2004, the Treasure Coast Regional Planning Council will be holding a General Planning Charrette for the north county area. As part of the pre- planning/ program development activities for this Charrette, a project steering committee needs to be formed. This Steering Committee should be from nine (9) to eleven (11) members and should be made up of interested citizens of the area, interested land owners of the area, and other effected interest groups. By way of suggestion, the following list represents what staff believes would be cross- section of the community for developing this planning program: 1.) Representative of the Lakewood Park Property Owners 2.) Representative of the Spanish Lakes Communities (Fairways & Country Club Village) 3.) Representative of the Holiday Pines Property Owners 4.) Representative of the loced agricultural industry 5.) Representative of the land holders/owners in the area west of Emerson Avenue 6.) Representative of the Ft. Pierce Farms Drainage Control District 7.) Representative of the Local Conservation Interest Groups 8.) Representative of the Board of County Commissioners 9.) Representative of the Planning & Zoning Commission 10.) At large community representative 11.) At large community representative In order that we may move forward on this project, I need the Board to provide appointments to this Steering Committee as soon as possible. If those appointments can be made by November 15, 2003, that would greatly be appreciated. ... ".. -.../ October 20. 2003 Page 5 Subject: North County Planning Charrette Staff will be scheduling an agenda item on the 28th of October to discuss this matter further and accept any appoints that you may have at that time. If you have any questions about this, please let me know DJM TCRPC_NORTHCOUNTYSTUDY1(H) cc: County Administrator County Attorney Planning Manager Michael Busha, TCRPC ".... ,.." AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. '7 DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [XX] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [] TO: BOARD OF COUNìY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Herman's Bay Beach Access - Exchange for Alternate Beach Access Property - Permission to Advertise BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board grant permission to advertise Q public hearing on November 25, at 7:00 p.m. to consider the proposed exchange of County property. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: Pulled Prior to Meeting [ ] APPROVED [] DENIED 1)(1 OTHER: County Attorney: J1/ Review and Approvals Originating Dept. Com. Dev. Dir~ Parks & Rec Dir: f~JA~ Management & Budget Prop, Acq. Mgr' Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eft, 5/96 '-' .....I r INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO.: 03-1535 DATE: October 23, 2003 SUBJECT: Herman's Bay Beach Access - Exchange for Alternate Beach Access Property - Permission to Advertise ************************************************************************** BACKGROUND: The County owns property where the Herman's Bay beach access is located. The beach access is approximately one hundred feet (100') wide. Herman's Bay beach access is shown on the attached map in green. The County obtained the property by Warranty Deed dated September 24, 1962. A copy of this deed is also attached. The developer of Diamond Sands has proposed to convey property to the County that is approximately one hundred fifty feet (150') feet wide in exchange for the County's conveyance of the Herman's Bay beach access property to the developer. The developer has proposed to construct parking and lighting improvements on the property proposed to be conveyed to the County. The property the developer proposes to convey to the County is shown on the attached map in pink. Under Florida law (Section 125.37, Florida Statutes), the County must hold a public hearing and adopt a resolution before exchanging County property. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board grant permission to advertise 0 public hearing on November 25 at 7:00 p.m. to consider the proposed exchange of County property. DSM/ caf Attachments ""-' QUIT_CLAIM DUD O:R:l Bn:¡ DREW'S FOIM t. E. . A F,\[,[501 Man..... ~ nnd far ",I. by T~. ~. & W. .. Dr.... C"mQ"n~ ~ ...,. )o,Juonville. FI'>r;da ~~~'120413 I r-A-/'A .r.~ This iIluiHtl4ím Beed, Emul,d Ih" vi;!:. day of September, A. D. 1962 ,by W. C. SCHMIDT, Also known as WILLIAM C. SCHM+DT joined by his wife, CECELIA G. SCHMIDT firsl party, 10 ST 0 LUCIE COUNTY whose pastoffice address is Drawer 111, Fort Pierce, Florida '1'. second p~rty: . , (Where.er ",cd hu"in eh" tu";,, "fiue p.....ty'· and "..."and party" .hall include ,ingular and plural, h"in, l"gal repr..."nlit,tlvCl, and a.';gns!lf 'ndividual., and the 'UÇÇes!<1t1 ..nd _¡go. or corpor;uian., whereyer rho can lex! aoadmi(.oo,rc'l} ¡,-....) Witnesseth, That ¡he said first parly, for and in consideration of ¡he sum 0/ $ 10.00 in hand paid by I1lf~ said second party, the receipt whereof is hereby aCknowledged, does hereby remise, re- lef1Se and quit-claim unto !he said second party forever, all the right, tille, in!eresl, claim and demand which the said first party has in and to the following described lot. piece or.,.parcel" (¡!-land, situate, lying and being in the County of St. Lucie State of Florida , to-wit: All that part of the North 100 feet, including riparian and littoral rights appurtenant thereto, of the following described lands în St. Lucie County, Florida, to-wit: The South 3705.83 feet of the following described property, situ- ate, lying and being in St. Lucie County, Florida, to-wit: A tract of land in Section 22 and 27, Township 36 South, Range 41 East, St. Lucie County, Florida, bounded on the South by a line parallel to and 765 feet northerly (measured at right angles) from the South line of said Section 27; on the North by a line parallel ¡to and 6323.74 feet northerly (measured at right angles) from the ~%I South line of said Section 27; on the West by the waters of the ~i ~ndian River; and on the East by the waters of the Atlantic Ocean; '¥~he above description describing the South 4000 ocean front feet fr,.ç of said property in accordance with the "Base line" as shown on the George S. Brockway survey under file No. TMA-ll09. Together with the riparian and littoral rights appurtenant thereto or in anywise belonging. Subject to all existing rights-of-way for public roads and the Intra-Coastal waterway, if any, which lies East of the East right-of-way line of State Road A-I-A Section 94050-2107, according to the right-of-way map of said roaA recorded in Map Book 1, pages 27~ 127 and 29 in the office of the Clerk of Circuit Court, St. Lucie County, Florida. The above described lands are deeded pursuant to tQe Resolution adopt ed by the Board or County Commissioners of Stw Luc~e County on Augu~t 8, 1962 abandoninl¡the O¡d A-l-A, or ~eaçh road'frightb-of-wavf: and 1í~. d t Id sa¡d lands are 0 be used or pu lie pO poses ø naut an 0 0 the same together wi/ all and singular the appu.rtenances thereunto belonging or in anywise appertaining, and all the as/ale, right, title, interest, lien. equity and claim what- soever of the said first party, either in law or equity, to the only proper use, benefit and behoof of the said second party forever. nly In :Ji/itness 1tIhefeof, Th. ,aid J;,,' po,'y h.. first above wrillen. Signed, sealed and delIvered in presence of: signed and sealed these presents the day and year <h~~hh /..,.tz:!~~,..,.......,...,.. :l:,,-·)c h.Csh·1i'¿a~Ihh hhk'di?h" w. . e ml. t 1 a so nown as ¿/)~1f~~,:.~':~C~%£:;1~¡k(D , 11, 1,/1..,', J-I CL.t·) Schm~ t I I /~j.., Cece ~a G. STATE OF ~ New York COUNTY OF /3-1. e: } I HEREBY CERTIFY that on this day, before me, an officer duly authorb:ed in the State aforesaid and io the County alon'said to take acknowledgments, personaUy appeared Wo. Co SCHMIDTaho knoWl1hae William C. Schmidt, h~s wiÏe.~-Cecel~a G. ~c rn~dt to me known to be the penon SdesCflhed 10 and who executed the foregoing instrument and they before me that the~., .e;1t.e~~~¡;::4:the ,arne. . ~ WITNESS my baridand' official ,eal 10 the County and State last aforesaid thi, Ì/ Y. SePtembeF::;,:-.:':'i.:'6~I9,62. /m~~;¡~~ f~{,:;>:·L"·_·>~~· Notary Public '! joined by acknowledged day of A~ / .. __, ",.'- ".: , ~iy·!.']ommission rNQt,jirY'jS~~l).<:.i\~" DAVID A. BIRK8Y _ R"9.. NCI: 959 :..'''' --- - Notðry Public ill the Stðt" of Nflw Yori \. , I\It¡fdi~\I in Eri.. Co. "t tim.. ol·^PPoin/mell' .' Mv Gommiuion Ëxpires Mð,cn 30, 19..."'.. Expires: /' 1ft yt ~L/ 5D \ (f) (]) g5Œ Ü c ü ('\j «13 >< ..cW ü ('\j>, (])t CO(]) 0.. >'0 ('\j I.- COD... (f)u c (]) ('\j (f) E8. as e ID... EJ QJ :;;;::: ~ ü GS Lu Q:¡ 2 Œ:J ü a:: rI. c «j ill Ü o ü '"§ a:I ;5j? u -< n 0, e") o z -< -! I", N on ~ '" "'- u §:~ c\JN 8""' o , '" '" '" ~ o 0: tú ~ U lí)<f "'-' 8\) 0". 6 ..~ C5' 90 C\J2 C\J .« ::::-! ~ d+J 8~ § -+1 '" '" fO"L1tL c o o OJ «j -' ill ,è: a: c a:I '5 c U b..i VI CI) 1:3 ü ü <::;( :r:: ü liS Q:¡ >- as v.> :;;;::: ~ ffi :r:: u <r ;x L b, e:, pC dq o p., <r " (/'1 <r () ~ , \ ) \ \ \ , \ \.I¡\ ,~ Î'" \ \ z /....... L? 0'> <. "'- §~ t"l 8' o ,;, ~-! ~ ~< \0 t..f) "'- a tD ~, "'0 82; 0'"" , -.I "'OJ ~, ~ ~ U) \ \ \ \,/ C') o ~ <') N ill l!) .Q N o N Õ o II "Q ~ ill ~ ill ~(ij e ü Q.(/) ~ :2 tI C '" '" u « \ \ \ , \ -'1\\ ~\ .., 96r_.~/- ..q-~-> '-" ...." AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. tØ4 DATE: October 28. 2003 TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS REGULAR: (X) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) NSENT: ( ) SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): ADMINISTRATION SUBJECT: General Master's Contract BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: 107-605-531000-1631 Professional Services- Fine & Foñeiture Fund and Article V Reserve Account PREVIOUS ACTION: See attached memorandum RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends a 9-month extension of the agreement with Albert B. Moore for General Master services at a monthly contract of $7,500 and that the County Attorney make the necessary changes to this agreement to be signed by the Board Chairman. COMMISSION ACTION: o APPROVED .X! OT'tER: o DENIED More Info Needed Reschedule for future agenda Review and ADDrovals º County Attorney: o Management and Budget: º Purchasing: º Originating Dept: º Other: º Other: º Finance: Check for copy only, If applicable: Anyone with 8 disability requiring accommodaUons to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Manager at 772.462.1777 or TTD 772·462·1428, at least 48 hours (48) prior to tha roaating, H:\WIN\WP\AGENDA\ABMooreGenIMaster.wpd , ' \.,t ...., TO: COUNTY ADMINISTRATION MORANDUM 03·179 FROM: DATE: RE: Douglas M. Anderson October 21, 2003 General Master Services BACKGROUND: On January 7, 2003 the County entered into a contract with Albert B. Moore to serve as General Master for SI. Lucie County with the agreement expiring September 30, 2003. Under the Terms of Payment, Mr. Moore was to be compensated for no more than $40 per hour at 40 hours per week. At this time, based upon the workload of Mr. Moore, staff is recommending that we compensate him with a monthly salary of $7,500. This amount is supported by a July 10t" memorandum from Tom Willis, Trial Court Administrator, stating that this salary is more in line with what other Circuits are paying General Masters (copy attached). It is also my understanding that Mr. Moore will assume the probate and guardianship responsibilities in January, The County currently has Mr. Moore's salary budgeted for a nine month period, from October 1, 2003 to June 30, 2004, in the amount of $62,400. Staff is recommending that the budget be increased to $67,500 for a 9-month period, ending June 30, 2004. It is unknown at this time, that under the implementation of Article V Revision 7, whether or not the State will pick up the salary for this service, effective July 2004. Should the State not pick up this responsibility at that time, the County would possibly extend this agreement with Mr. Moore until September 30, 2004. The funding sources for the $67,500 would come from the current $62,400 budget together with the remaining $5,100 coming from the Article V Revision 7 reserve account, which was established by the County during the 03-04 Budget process. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends a 9-month extension of the agreement with Albert B. Moore for General Masters Services at a monthly salary of $7,500 and that the County Attorney make the necessary changes to this agreement to be signed by the Board Chairman. DMAlab 03·179 13/<:18/2003 -,-0:05 772-4&2-2135 COURT ADMIN:STRA-:a~ P::.GE J;:' '-' ..".¡ ".', k)' O>;¡.; (':;;.....,p.,;ì'.,~ 1:...-0" \;,..~...'4!1?'.~""';¡ !""I''''_.·ff..,",~.... ....~~ ¡; "'<'<i::-,;C' f'1' :~""..,.µ:.,) ~.''''~'.~ ~~,~j.;' ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE OF THE COURTS INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM 2003-87 TO: Chief Judge C",thia Angelos Adrojnistrativc Judge Ben L Bryan FROM:~m Willis, Trial Court Administrator DATE: July 10. 2003 RE, General Muter At Moore *...*~...*......~~..*..*.**.*.*~~........~..*~.......*~..**....*..*...~*... P]ease be a¿viscd that St. Lucie County Ad:ninistrator Doug Anderson .called me on 719/03 iu reference to AI Moore. Mr. Anderso" stated tha: he felt we showd co"sider changing Mr Moore fi'om a p.id by the hottr contracted ""'ploy.. to a paid by the month contract employee. His rea:sonin,g is that :Ylr. Moore i.s j]1 a professional position 3t.Id ('Ither contracted attorneys are OD a straight salary per month. I t.i:I:ir,k this is an ~cel1ent idea. Currently Mr. Moore is fimdcd for 40 he-un per week at $40,00 per hour. W. have to track hi. hours and literalty tell hi", to nor work any morc when his maximum has be-.r¡ rcached, Th;. would free him to do as much as necessary to g.. the job done. Tn addition, he currently goes without pay when on Va.ca.tiOl1. Under the new system, time off would not result in a monetaT)' penalty. Howey(1', if we: are gObg to go on a straight monthly salary, we need. to consj.der a. raise for the position (currently $83,000,00). Mr. .Moore has indicated to m. he could easily work an additional 10 to 15 hour, per month, I woul': sugg"l raisin¡¡ his monthlysal.ry to $ 7,500,00. ($90,000,00 annually). Thi. is more in iin,. with what other CircuitS or. paying Gener.l Ma.t.", For iDstal1co the IS- Circuit OO ,e!1l! Master roco;,·o. 70% of a Circuit Judges salary ($94.500.00), .!fyou 'both agree' to this pIaI'l, I would suggest that youjoÎntly send a letter to Mr. Anderson and County CommiS!ion Chajrpcrson CliffS.mes endoning Mr, Andmon's plan."d the propos.d pay nlise, THWikhg ThClma~ H. Willis. Court Ad1:"t1,";SlUror . Z19 COI.IrL"ou,c AlkJition. :!1i: Soul~ Scc~d St,. ::-ortPJcm.F1oriÒoll34950 . (772: 462-1472 \w- '-' CYNTHIA G. ANGELOS CHIEF JUDGE 320 COURTIlOUSE ADDmON 218 SOUTH SECOND STREET FORT PIERCE, FLORIDA 34950 (772) 462·1469 SUN COM 259·1469 STATE OF FLORIDA NINETEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT October 21,2003 - \ ~'7 u \ Vll if V;:; \ \ h~ , {!j>¡ OJ I fì?r'I Doug Anderson, County Administrator St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 Dear Mr. Anderson: Ijoin and support the proposal to change the General Master's position as outlined in Judge Bryan's letter to you of July II, 2003. If you would like to discuss this matter further, please do not hesitate to contact me. Thank you so much for your assistance with this matter. í G. Angelos ChiefJudge CGNram I '--~, I , I Oel '2 'L -¡Jm_-~}", I ,. '. ... ')¡:¡:¡C~ '&ß-...."' "--- '-' ~ ~ ( , " \~ t,V ì f State of FforiM Circuit J\Id9- ~ July 11, 2003 ...." /N¡)M[:. ..- / 0) ~ j'u_' ,r'--J7> 1'£ c. , /;;rot $YI'T ' ~ r,ï'O';) .~ V Ii t..J"-" I St. Lucie Coun<y Co~ Suite 324 218 Sou.tft Second' Street Fort Pierœ, FCoriáa 34950 (772) 462·1460 Su.ncom259·1460 9t. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners clo Doug Anderson, County Administrator ~-300 Virginia Avenue ,- Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 Re: Funding of General Maste(s Position Dear Mr. Anderson and Members of the County Commission: A propcrsal is being considered to change Albert Moore's funding for the General Master position from an hourly rate to payment on a monthly basis. I support that, as approval would allow the General Master to take on additional duties. I concur with the proposal that Mr. Moore be paid on that basis at a rate comparable to that paid by other counties. The Court Administrator, Tom Willis, has suggested $7,500 per month. Mr. Willis has informed me that this is slightly less than what the General Masters are receiving in the 15th Judicial Circuit. . Based upon my experience as the Administrative Judge of the Family Division, I can assure you that the General Master program has been extremely helpful in expediting the 'dockets. Mr. Moore's work has enabled me to handle cases outside of the family law area to which I am assigned. He currently resolves cases outside of family law, including dependency and mental health. I am informed that the Chief Judge is anticipating expanding his duties further in the near future. I endorse the proposal. The rate of pay suggested by the Court Administrator is reasonable based upon the efficiency resulting to the Court system, which benefits the citizens of St. Lucie County utilizing its services. Your help is greatly appreciated. , Yours very truly, ~ Ben L. Bryan Jr. , BLBlan i 1:'-~:·i--~~'--·it,-7;-~·-~-~?-_·;~.~··- ¡ l: I ,--.::..----;::.-...:-, :- -. 1_'1 I "ì ;¡ -~:'¡ --·--:!!II ¡: r'i ; i i.! I tei L' JUl " 6 2003 i L!V L . J CC, ADr\J~;N_ OFFICE ----- '-' ..I MEMORANDUM 04-13 OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT & BUDGET DATE: OCTOBER 17, 2003 TO: DOUGLASM.ANDERSON,COUN~~~STRATOR MARIE GOUIN, OMB DIRECTOR ,~ FROM: SUBJECT: GENERAL MASTER'S CONTRACT In order to increase General Master's salary to the level requested by the Court Administrator in his memo from 7/10/03, we need an additional $5,100 calculated as follows: $90,000 x 75% $67,500 - $62.400 $ 5,100 12-month salary requested by Court Administrator Nine month period from October 2003 to June 2004 Less current budget from October, 2003 to June 2004 Additional funding needed Please call if you have any questions regarding this memo. Thank you! ~" I<b~-;'>\ /. -<''''!'-' .,\. /-:--~.\.,- '-;\ ~~,. ,,~~~ \ ..... <~,; ~t 1 L- ./ ' ,;\)/ '\ \//<,-\0;0 \,\ ç§.. " ()'Í'Y , ~ / "\,\,, ,:' \ ,. '" '\\,'" ' \ \./ V-\'.' \ C,o>·· \../ G,\BUDGBT\WP\MEMOS\MBM004\04-13ALMOORB.DOC ... ..." BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS COU NTY ATTORNEY DanIel S. Mcintyre Heather Young Katherine Macl<enzie·Smith Victoria Winfield ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORN I ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORN! ASSISTANT COUNTY ATTORN! January IS, 2003 Albert B. Moore, Esq. 1109 Delaware Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 Re: General Master Agreement Dear Mr. Moore: Enclosed are four original executed agreements with Board of County Commissioners ofSt. Lucie County. Please sign the four originals and return two originals to our office for further processing. Thank you. Sincerely, ~~ Legal Secretary las Enclosures cc: Contract Coordinator (w/copy) Finance Department (J. Hollnagel, w/out enclosure) File (w!copy) JOHN D. Or.UHN. District NO.1· DOUG COWARD, DistrIct NO.2· PAULA A. LEWI5, DiSTriCt NO.3· FRANNIE HUTCHIN50N. District No.4. ClIFr ßAP.NES, DistriCt No 5 County Administrator· Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue' 3rd Floor Admin, Annex. Fort Pierce. FL 34982·5652 . Phone (772) 462·1441 FAX (772) 462·1440 . TDD (772) 462·1428 "-" ..It 03-DI- \(gJ. AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into this ~ day of J;;nua('J ,2003 by and between the BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS OF ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA (hereinafter referred to as the "Board"), and ALBERT B. MOORE, ESQillRE, (hereinafter referred to as the "General Master"). WITNESSETH: WHEREAS, the Board is desirous of providing sufficient staff in support of the judiciary of the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit ("Circuit") in and for St. Lucie County to ensure that juvenile dependency, family and mental health law matters ("matters") are handled in a timely manner in the family, juveni1e and mental health divisions; WHEREAS, the Board desires to obtain the services of an attorney to serve as the General Master for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in and for St. Lucie County in the family, juvenile and mental hea1th divisions; and, WHEREAS, the General Master is a member in good standing of the Florida Bar knowledgeable in the areas of juvenile dependency, fami1y and mental health law, has been selected by the Chief Judge of the Circuit, and is willing and abIe to serve as the Genera1 Master for the Circuit in and for 81. Lucie County. NOW, THEREFORE, for and in consideration of the premises and the mutual covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: I. RESPONSIBILITIES A. The General Master shall serve as the General Master for matters in the Circuit in and for 81. Lucie County. 1 '-' ...." B. The General Master shall perfonn all assignments as directed by the family, mental health and juvenile judges for their respective divisions. C. The General Master shall coordinate the hearing schedules in order to timely adjudicate alI cases brought before him. D. Following conclusion of a hearing, the General Master shall promptly issue a recommended order to the presiding judge. E. The General Master acknowledges and agrees that the General Master shall not maintain a private law practice witlùn the state of Florida. F. The Court Administrator shall provide for the first year part-time clerical support staff to assist the General Master in the perfonnance of the responsibilities hereunder. Such staff shall be paid with remaining available funds. The Court Administrator shall maintain a record of compensation paid to the clerical support staff pursuant to this Agreement. II. TERM: TERMINATION The tenn ofthis Agreement shall commence on January 6, 2003 and shall continue through and including September 30 200 . Upon mutual consent of the parties, the tenn of this Agreement may be exten ed as agreed upon by the parties. Either party shall have the right to tenninate this Agreement with or without cause, in whole or in part, upon 60 calendar days prior written notice to the other party. In the event of such tennination, the General Master shall be paid on a pro rata basis for all work perfonned up to the effective date of tennination. III. TERMS OF PAYMENT The County will compensate the General Master on a monthly basis for services rendered pursuant to this Agreement. The General Master will be compensated for no more than 40 hours of work per week at an hourly rate offorty and 00/100 dollars ($40.00) per hour. The County shall not reimburse the General Master for any expenses incurred in the course of per fanning services under this Agreement. The General Master shall provide appropriate time records to the Court Administrator at the end of each week. The Court Administrator shall review the time records submitted by the General Master and shall forward the records to the County Administrator with a recommendation as to whether the Board should pay the bill. The St. Lucie County Finance Department shall maintain a record of compensation paid to the General Master pursuant to this Agreement. IV. INDEMNIFICATION AND HOLD HARMLESS AGREEMENT The General Master shall, during the tenn ofthis Agreement, indemnify and hold the 2 '-" ~ Board harmless ITom any and all claims, liability, losses and causes of action which may arise out of the actions of negligence, in whole or in part of the General Master, its officials, agents, employees or assigns, in the fulfillment of this Agreement. The General Master shall pay all claims aild losses of any nature whatever in connection therewith, during the term of this Agreement, including all costs and judgments that may issue thereon. V. COOPERATION WITH RESPECT TO LITIGATION The General Master shall cooperate with the Board in any litigation or related matter which may arise out of the performance of this Agreement, and appear and testifY in any hearing should the General Master be requested to do so by the Board, provided the General Master be compensated at a rate to be mutually agreed upon by the Board and the General Master. VI. PROFESSIONAL INDEPENDENCE OF THE GENERAL MASTER It is understood and agreed that the General Master is not an employee of the Board. The General Master is, and shall remain, an independent professional with respect to all services performed under this Agreement. No partnership relationship between the Board and the General Master is created or intended by this Agreement. VII. ASSIGNMENT This is an Agreement for unique personal services and the General Master's obligation hereunder is not assignable. The General Master shall not assign, transfer, pledge, hypothecate, surrender, or otherwise encumber or dispose of any of its rights under this Agreement, or any interest in any portion of same, without the prior written consent of the Board. VIII. RECORDS: ACCESS The General Master shan maintain records of all accounts, invoices for reimbursable expenses and supporting documentation for any research or reports, for a period of five years ITom completing performance of this Agreement. Such records shall be sufficient to permit a proper pre- and post-audit in accordance with general accounting methods. The General Master shall permit the Board or its designated agent to inspect such records at the location where they are kept upon reasonable prior notice. The General Master shall allow public access to all matters relating to this contract and compensation under the contract in accordance with the provisions of Chapter I 19, Florida Statutes. IX. NON DISCRIMINATION The General Master shall assure that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, creed, national origin, handicap, or sex, be excluded ITom participation in, denied the benefits of, or 3 \0..- ....., otherwise subjected to discrimination in any activity under this Agreement. The General Master shall take all measures necessary to effectuate these assurances. X. COMPLIANCE WITH LAWS The General Master, its employees, subcontractors or assigns, shall comply with all applicable federal, state, and local laws and regulations relating to the perfonnance of this Agreement. XI. AMENDMENT This Agreement may be amended only with the written approval of the parties. XII. WAIVERS Failures or waivers to enforce any covenant, condition, or provision of this Agreement by the parties, their successors and assigns shall not operate as à discharge or, invalidate, such covenant, condition, or provision, or impair the enforcement rights of the parties, their successors and assigns. XIII. COMPLETE AGREEMENT This Agreement states the entire understanding between the parties and supersedes any written or oral representations, statements, negotiations, or agreements to the contrary. The General Master recognizes that any representations, statements or negotiations made by the Board staff do not suffice to legally bind the Board in a contractual reIationship unless they have been reduced to writing, authorized, and signed by an authorized Board representative. This Agreement shall bind the parties, their assigns, and successors in interest. XIV. NOTICE All notices required in this Agreement shall be sent by certified mail, return receipt requested, and if sent to the Board shall be mailed to: If to the Board: With a copy to: St. Lucie County Administrator 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Annex 3n1 Floor Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 St. Lucie County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Administration Annex 3«1 Floor Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 4 ""'" .., And if sent to the General Master shall be mailed to: ALBERT B. MOORE, Esquire 1109 Delaware Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34982 XV. CONFLICT OF INTEREST The General Master represents that he presently has no interest and shall acquire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner with the perfonnance of services required hereunder, as provided for in section 112.31 I, Florida Statutes. The General Master further represents that no person having any interest shall be employed for said perfonnance. The General Master shall promptly notify the Board in writing by certified mail of all potential conflicts of interest prohibited by existing state law for any prospective business association, interest or circumstance, the nature of work that the General Master may undertake and request an opinion ofthe Board as to whether the association, interest or circumstance would, in the opinion of the Board, constitute a conflict of interest if entered into by the General Master. The Board agrees to notify the General Master of its opinion by certified mail within thirty days of receipt of notification by the General Master. If, in the opinion of the Board the prospective business association, interest or circumstance would not constitute a conflict of interest by the General Master, the Board shall so state, the General Master will have the option to enter into said association, interest or circumstance, and it shall not be deemed a conflict of interest with respect to services provided to the Board by the General Master under the tenns of this Agreement. XVI. SITUS: VENUE The laws of the State of Florida shall govem this Agreement. In the event it is necessary for either party to initiate legal action regarding this Agreement, venue shall be in the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit in St. Lucie County for claims under state law and the Southem District of Florida for any claims that are justiciable i,n=,federal court. IN WIT OF, the parties hereto have executed this document on the date first above w .~~~ 'j.~.'·,'."'.1¡" ~ (.,j .J"'"':""ì> ~ ATTEST: 5 47 ;;=-,,¡!,,:XI BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS Q, t.-é ,; 'I 1.... ~\ ,'¿'>Y'Ù'; J c:,.:¡ ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA . ..;:+~-'i,,~ ~ <'ú. .....~c W£ ,~~;., ~~ i::} .......... ....f:J l: CQUNN' I \ ~TYCLE / ~ By: 9~ ----- 5 , '- ...", WITNESSES: AS TO FORM AND T ALBERT B. MOO ALBERT B. MOORE G:\A1TY\AGREEMN1\hearlneoflker.moore,doc 6 r TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Admini5tration SUBJECT: Bi-Weekly Committee Report5 AGENDA REQUEST ...., ITEM NO~ DATE: October 28. 2003 REGULAR [X ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ ] PRESENTED BY: BOCC BACKGROUND: At the April 11. 2000 Board of County Commi55ioner5 Meeting it wa5 decided by the Board to place an item on the agenda. on a bi-weekly ba5i5. to give the Board an opportunity to provide update5 on the variou5 Committee5 and Advi50ry Board5 that they 5erve on. It ha5 been decided by the County Admini5trator that thi5 item will be placed on the agenda on the 2'· and 4'" Tue5day of each month. FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Thi5 meeting the Board will provide update5 on the following Committee5 and Advi50ry Board5 that they 5erve on: Committee Blueway Advi50ry Committee Chamber of Commerce Board of Dir. Children'5 Service5 Council Cultural Affair5 Council Friend5 of SLC Library Property & Homeowner5 St. Lucie County Fire Di5trict Tran5portation DLCB Trea5ure Coa5t Regional Planning Council COMMISSION ACTION: Pulled Prior to Meeting Pulled due to timing constraints lJ APPROVED [] DENIED [.1\ OTHER: Meetin¡¡¡ Date A5 Needed Monthly 2'· Thur5day 2'· Tue5day 2'· Thur5day 2" Wedne5day 3" Wedne5day Quarterly 3'· Friday CONCURRENCE: Commi55ioner Barne5 Lewi5 Lewi5 Lewi5 Bruhn Barne5 Bruhn/Coward Lewi5 Coward/Hutchin50n , J 10/23/03 F7.ABWARR FUND 001 001137 001146 001148 001149 001152 001274 001281 101 101001 101002 101006 102 102001 105 107 107001 140 140001 140125 140325 - , , 183001 183004 185003 310002 310201 316 316201 362 396 401 418 421 441 448 449 451 458 461 471 478 491 505 505001 f;11 '-" ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD -.I WARRANT LIST #56- 18-0CT-2003 TO 22-0CT-2003 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund Zora Neala Hurston Dust Tracks Heri FTA USC Section 5307 FY03 CSBG Grant FY03 Section 112/MPO/FHWA/Planning 2004 Urban Mobile Irrigation Lab 02/03 FDCA Emer Mgmt Prep & Assis FY03 FL Fishing & Boating Heritage Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust Interlocals Transportation Trust/80% Constitut Transportation Trust/Impact Fees Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU Library Special Grants Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-Wireless Sur Port & Airport Fund Port Fund FAA Noise Compatibility Study Updat Conduct Part 150 Study Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-ArbitrationjMediat Ct Admin.- Teen Court FHFA SHIP FY02/03 Impact Fees-Parks FDEPjFRDAP Ancient Oaks County Capital FDEP/FRDAP Savanna Rec Phase II Sports Complex Improv Fund Lennard Road 1 - Roadway Capital Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund H.E.W. Utilities Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities NHI Uti I-Renewal & Replacement Fund NHI Util - Capital Facilities Fund S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund SH Util-Renewal & Replacement Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin No Cty Util Dist-Renewal & Replace Building Code Fund Health Insurance Fund Property/Casualty Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Law Library GRAND TOTAL: EXPEi'ISES 944,946.08 73.40 40,136.00 8,466.77 338.04 658.84 302.00 22,049.08 55,057.01 400.00 50,190.69 11,387.78 17,642.14 8,181.79 10,448.88 119,074.26 380.13 14,951. 08 13,183.43 7,530.73 836.75 191.35 364.86 142.06 79.52 545.47 25,000.00 180.00 123,155.61 506.00 19,693.85 13,253.00 503,756.53 3,780.48 5,626.93 15,188.01 3,087.20 12,024.70 4,747.77 20,328.98 15,408.70 7,392.43 1,862.70 564.12 110,095.80 9,999.93 10,246.49 21,110.73 2,254,568.10 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 · ; 10/23/03 F7.ABWARR FUND TITLE '--' ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ""'" WARRANT LIST #56- 18-0CT-2003 TO 22-0CT-2003 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO 145 Mosquito Fund 145816 Ind River Lagoon License Plate 2002 " I GRAND TOTAL: _. . EXPENSES 17,331.82 868.50 18,200.32 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 0.00 , , 10/23/03 F7.ABWARR FUND 184 . TITLE """ ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD '..,¡I WARRANT LIST #56- 18-0CT-2003 TO 22-0CT-2003 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION Erosion Control Operating Fund " GRAND TOTAL: - . EXPENSES 6,254.67 6,254.67 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 , I 10/25/03 F"ABWARR FUND 001 101 101002 101211 102 102001 102105 107 107003 107133 140 160 183 183001 185003 316201 401 418 441 451 461 - -' 611 615 625 I \w- ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD 'wtI WARRANT LIST # 5- 23-0CT-2003 TO 24-0CT-2003 FUND SUMMARY TITLE General Fund Transportation Trust Fund Transportation Trust/80% Constitut FDEP Canal & Stormwater Retrofit Unincorporated Services Fund Drainage Maintenance MSTU FDOT Bicycle/Pedestrian Coordinator Fine & Forfeiture Fund Fine & Forfeiture Fund-800 Mhz Oper USDOJ St Criminal Alien Assist FY03 Port & Airport Fund Plan Maintenance RAD Fund Ct Administrator-19th Judicial Cir Ct Administrator-Arbitration/Mediat FHFA SHIP FY02/03 FDEP/FRDAP Savanna Rec Phase II Sanitary Landfill Fund Golf Course Fund North Hutchinson Island Utilities S. Hutchinson Utilities Fund Sports Complex Fund No County Utility District-Operatin Health Insurance Fund Tourist Development Trust-Adv Fund Impact Fees Fund Law Library GRAND TOTAL: , ..- . EXPENSES 331,046.97 6,046.91 13,233.40 1,989.00 3,165.65 23.75 0.00 225,498.09 29,719.67 5,106.00 635.83 973.63 1,732.07 15.56 12,809.86 841. 88 10,790.09 8,284.44 39.91 1,031.32 2,120.50 701.78 429,422.18 5,099.88 3,360.00 233.73 1,093,922.10 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 25,810.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 136.62 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 25,947.02 .' [ 10/25/03 F"I'.BWARR FUND TITLE "-'" .",J ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD WARRANT LIST # 5- 23-0CT-2003 TO 24-0CT-2003 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO EXPENSES 145 Mosquito Fund 519.33 ; GRAND TOTAL: 519.33 - . PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 '--' ..", 10/25/03 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 1 F~ABWARR WARRANT LIST # 5- 23-0CT-2003 TO 24-0CT-2003 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 184 Erosion Control Operating Fund 445.53 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 445.53 0.00 .' ; - . t AGENDA REQUEST ITEM ~ CII-I DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Katherine Mackenzie-Smith Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Partial Release of Lien for St. Lucie County Code Enforcement Board Order Imposing Fine/Lien in Case No. 18318 dated June 4, 2003 BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: N/A RECOMMENDATION CONCLUSION: Staff recommends the Board authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Partial Release of Lien. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: JCJ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Douglas County A Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent Review and Approvals [X] County Attorney:L ]Management & Budget: [ ]Purchasing: [ ] Comm. Development.: [xl Public Works Director [ ] Solid Waste Mgr [ ]Finance:(check far copy only, if applicable) Effective 5/96 '-' -...I t INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM COUNTY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Katherine Mackenzie-Smith, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 03- DATE: October 10, 2003 SUBJECT: Partial Release of Lien for St. Lucie County Code Enforcement Board Order Imposing Fine/Lien in Case No. 18318 dated June 4, 2003 BACKGROUND: On May 7, 2003, the St. Lucie County Code Enforcement Board found the property at 2410 N. 21st Street, Fort Pierce, Florida to be in violation. On June 4, 2003, the St. Lucie County Code Enforcement Board issued an Order to pay a fine of $100.00 per day for every day the violation continues beginning May 22, 2003. A mortgage foreclosure suit and the Notice of Lis Pendens were filed on November 13, 2002. The Final Judgement of Foreclosure was granted May I9, 2003 and the property was sold on June 20, 2003. The Code Enforcement Lien was recorded on July 16, 2003 in Official Record Book 1753, Page 1134. Based on the above sequence of events and pursuant to Section 48.23, Florida Statutes (2003), the above referenced Code Enforcement Board is not a lien on the property at 2410 North 21st Street, Fort Pierce, Florida. Section 48.23, Florida Statutes in pertinent part states: ·...the filing for record of such notice of lis pendens shall constitute a bar to the enforcement against the property described in said notice of lis pendens of all interests and liens...and if such proceedings are prosecuted to a judicial sale of the property described in said notice of lis pendens, the property shall be forever discharged from all such unrecorded interests and liens..... Jacobson Auction Company requests a Partial Release of Lien (attached). The Partial Release of Lien will not release the lien from any other property owned by the violator. ""'" ~ \ RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends the Board authorize the Chairman to sign the attached Partial Release of Lien. Respectfully submitted KMS/cb J~ Katherine Mackenzie-Smith Assistant County Attorney H: \ÂgendaMemo-KMS-2.wpd , -~ AM P.Bl · --- .."t AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-2a DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [ I PUBLIC HEARING [ CONSENT [XI TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks & Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh Director SUBJECT: Ft. Pierce American league's request to be added to the lawnwood User's List. BACKGROUND: The attached letter was received by the Parks & Recreation staff from the Ft. Pierce American league president requesting that the organization be added to the lawnwood Users list which allows for use of the fields at no charge. The purpose of the request is to accommodate a new baseball program for ages 13-18. Staff spoke to Mrs. Ward and we were able to arrive at an amicable agreement as outlined in the attached correspondence. The Recreation Advisory Board recommends approval of this request. FUNDS AVAilABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the Ft. Pierce American league's request to be added to the lawnwood User list which will allow for use of the fields as scheduling permits for free. COMMISSION ACTION: [Xj APPROVED [ I OTHER: CONCURRENCE: [ I DENIED Coordination/Sia natures Approved (4-0) Bruhn-Absent County Attorney: Jy Management & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept: h Public Works: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) _ ""' I F PA I FT. PIERCE AMERICAN LITTLE LEAGUE 2503 DELAWARE AVE. - PO BOX 13322 - Fort Pierce, Florida 34149 - United Stales Phone (7721"'~1eo - Fu (7721"'~150 ..." October 02, 2003 '- St. Lucie County Parks and Recreation Attention: KeDy Tiger 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, Fl. 34947 \ To whom it may concern, My name is Dana Ward and I am the current president for Ft. Pierce American Little League, (a non-profit organization). Currently our program is only capable of accommodating children from the ages 5 through 12, we are looking to expand the ages to include ages 13 through 18. It has come to the attention of the league's Board of Directors in order to use the baseball fields at Lawnwood Stadium our league must first be on tþe . nSER LIST in order to be considered for the use of these fields at no cost to the league. ' What I am requesting is , what does our league have to do to be added to the USER LIST. We know field availability is limited and scheduling can be a hassle, but It has come to our attention that the softball field located on Virginia Ave., known as softball #1 has not been in use for quite some time and this field is or could be equipped as a multi-purpose field to: accommodate baseball. ./ cc Willie Redding KeDy Tiger Glenn Rains \ /' Sincerely, \./ :. iduL ana Ward, President 410'0' O:3q 10 - Home 3ro' 3044' Ceu- .J \or-' ,.." BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS fIiiIIJii PARKS & RECREATION October 15, 2003 Ft. Pierce American Little League Dana Ward, President PO BOX 13322 Ft. Pierce, Florida 34949 Dear Mrs. Ward: I would like to thank you for your continued efforts in providing the youth of our community with the opportunity to participate in the sport of baseball. To recap our conversation, Parks & Recreation staff will accommodate your request for game and practice times at Lawnwood Complex as scheduling allows. As you are probably aware, softball field # 1 is heavily programmed with softball and a number of other diversified programs. Although you indicated in your original correspondence that you would like to accommodate ages 13-18, during our conversation it was determined that the age group would be 13-15. We are in agreement that no modification is necessary to softball field # 1 to meet the needs ofthis age group. Staff will prepare an agenda requesting that the BOCC give approval to place your newly established league program for ages 13-15 on the Lawnwood User List which allows use ofthe fields at no charge to your league. We will notify you of the date. It i~ our understanding that you would begin enrollment in December and that the program would start in January or February. Staff is requesting that you provide a schedule to the Recreation Division at least 4S days prior to the program start date, so that we can better meet your needs. inda B own Parks & Recreation Assistant Director cc: Patti Raffensberger, Recreation Manager Willie Redden, Recreation Coordinator Kelly Tiger, Recreation Supervisor ITI Glenn Rains, RAB Chairman JOHN D. ORUHN. Disrrict NO.1· DOUG COWARD. Disrricr No.2. PAULA A. LEWIS, DiStriCT No. ~ . FRANNIE HUTCHINSON, Disrrict NO.4. CLIFF OAr\NES. Disrricr No.5 County AdministraTor - Douglas M. Anderson 2300 Virginia Avenue . Phane (772) 462-1515 . TDD (772) 462-1428 www.co.st-Iucie.fl.us ~. { ~ ..-. "-' '-' AGENDA lŒOUEST ITEM NO: C-2B DATE: October 28, 2003 lŒGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks and Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh SUBJECT: COMMUNITY CENTERS EXTERIOR SIGNS BACKGROUND: Several months ago, the Recreation Division ordered exterior signs for both the Fort pierce and Lincoln Park Community Centers. These signs allow the centers to advertise their programs and other events scheduled at the facilities. In an effort to reduce cost, staff had originally planned on using its own personnel for the installation. However, in the process of obtaining the permits from the City of Fort pierce, we were informed that we had to contract with a sign company to professionally install them. An estimate of $2,200 per sign has been obtained and funds are available in the current year's budget. This agenda requests the Board's approval to transfer the additional funds needed in order to complete the installation. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN: 001-7215-563000-75011 (LPCC - Improvements OfT Bldgs) 104001-7216-563000-150087 (FPCC - Improvements OfT Bldgs) lŒCOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval to transfer $4,400.00 in the Recreation budget in order to complete the installation of exterior signs at the Lincoln Park and Fort pierce Community Centers. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [ .Xl [- ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED ?:- Approved (4-0) Bruhn-Absent -" ~,-, If Originating Dept ~ ft . -- Review and A1>1>rovals Management .. Budget '7Yl ~ PurChasing'P / Other: Pinance: ,'- " """ AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO: C-2B DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [ ] ~UBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks and Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh SUBJECT: COMMUNITY CENTERS EXTERIOR SIGNS BACKGROUND: Several months ago, the Recreation Division ordered exterior signs for both the Fort Pierce and Lincoln Park Community Centers. These signs allow the centers to advertise their programs and other events scheduled at the facilities. In an effort to reduce cost, staff had originally planned on using its own personnel for the installation. However, in the process of obtaining the permits from the City of Fort Pierce, we were informed that we had to contract with a sign company to professionally install them. An estimate of $2,200 per sign has been obtained and funds are available in the current year's budget. This agenda requests the Board's approval to transfer the additional funds needed in order to complete the installation. ~REVIOUS ACTION: NfA FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN: 001-7215-563000-75011 (LPCC - Improvements OfT B1dgs) 104001-7216-563000-150087 (FPCC - Improvements OfT Bldgs) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of transfer of funds in the Recreation budget in order to complete the installation of exterior signs at the Lincoln Park and Fort Pierce Community Centers. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: APPROVED OTHER: DENIED Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator k County Attorney: ~ originating Dept 1 f L--- ' Review and AÐÐrovals Management . Budget /')')7 ~ Purchasing ,Ø"'/ other: Finance: AGENDA REOUEST ~ ITEM NO: C-2C ~ DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks and Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh SUBJECT: PROCUREMENT OF LINE MARKING MACHINE - EQUIPMENT REQUEST NUMBER EQ04-210 BACKGROUND: While the cost to line the numerous athletic fields is escalating, the machine used for that purpose is inefficient, requires heavy maintenance, and beyond its useful life. Currently, the Parks Division spends in excess of $235.00 (paint supplies only) to line one football field. Research by staff reveals that this function can be more economically accomplish with up-to-date machinery. The Topline TXE 505 that staff wishes to purchase will reduce cost by as much as 70%. As such, this agenda requests the Board's approval to purchase the machine at a cost of $1,685.00 (including freight). The equipment will be funded by the savings realized from EQ04-105, purchased on sale at a lesser cost. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN: 001-7210-564000-700 (Parks - Machinery and Equipment) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Equipment Request Number EQ04-210 to purchase the "Topline Marking Machlne." at a cost of $1,685. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: ¡'Xj [' ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent County Attorney: originating Dept'7 !/~ y Revie. and ADÐrovals Management & Budge~ Other: PurCha8ing:~ Finance: - "" ( , """ ....., AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO: C-2C DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks and Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keoqh SUBJECT: PROCUREMENT OF LINE MARKING MACHINE - EQUIPMENT REQUEST NUMBER EQ04-210 BACKGROUND: While the cost to line the numerous athletic fields is escalating, the machine used for that purpose is inefficient, requires heavy maintenance, and beyond its useful life. Currently, the Parks Division spends in excess of $235.00 (paint supplies only) to line one football field. Research by staff reveals that this function can be more economically accomplish with up-to-date machinery. The Topline TXE 505 that staff wishes to purchase will reduce cost by as much as 70%. As such, this agenda requests the Board's approval to purchase the machine at a cost of $1,685.00 (including freight). The equipment will be funded by the savings realized from EQ04-105, purchased on sale at a lesser cost. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FUNDS WILL BE MADE A~ILABLE IN: 001-7210-564000-700 (Parks - Machinery and Equipment) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of Equipment Request Number EQ04-210 to purchase the ~Topline Marking Machine." COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: APPROVED OTHER: DENIED Douglas M. Anderson County Administrator y Review and AÐÐrovals Management & BUdge~ Other: Purchasing: ~ county Attorney: originating Dept.! f/~ Finance: · .. " Cf) 0:: W-.:t Zo 00 -~ Cf)C") Cf)o -0 :EN :Eo:: 0« OW ~~ z« ::)(,) OCf) oU:: u..o:: 00 cu.. 0::1- «Cf) OW £0::) )-0 I-W zO:: ::)1- OZ (,)W W:E -Q. 0- ::)::) ..JO .W I- Cf) g e '" 'Oe e '" "'-;: -ê 15 o E fÈ.!! ,.,;:; e- '" '" ( ).~ .~ :J - <T Be '00 '" '" ~-æ - "'- .c . e?f!. 13¡2 ~ '" .- '" .l:.l: " " '" ::J E E .!! en .l:", 1-,., ..c ",'0 j/8 0.::J 0.'0 ~ I!! ~.8 "'- aj g:s1 lÓ~ M_ "'- .,.~ - - 00 ",OE 8 '" )( '" Q) e c= .- 0 "'- .- - '0'" ~8 =~ ~I- o . .E~ '" 13 õ'Ë '" 0 e e 2~ -'" '" ~ 8 ~ ~:2 - '" -I : ~fJ e ._ ~i ::J.l: Um a a .... , a a a ;! LO , a ~ N .... , ~ a a I! z :;¡ o CJ CJ c( a ~ ~ ... a o W ð w « I- Z W :;¡ Q. 5 a w "" -' AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO: C-2D DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [ ] ~UBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks and Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh SUBJECT: DONATION OF STACKABLE STALL ~1INELS WITH COMPOSITE ~LATE AND ATTACHMENT CLI~S BACKGROUND: The Saint Lucie County Fair Association recently donated $63,352.75 worth of stackable panels with composite plate and attachment clips (see attached list). In order for the Fairgrounds to maintain these items, they must be recognized by the Board. This transaction has been coordinated with the Finance Department, and no budget is required. ~REVIOUS ACTION: N/A FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board recognize this donation by the Fair Association. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [x] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED {;.¡ Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent County Attorney: Review and ADDrovals Management & BUd9~nt!J; PurChaeing~ Risk Manarntl~'v'r,ß~ Finance, ÇI~f} ~ originating Dept. Acldres", Address: City: phone: 772-464·2910 Fax: 772-464.8892 I STACKABLESTALL PANELS W/COMP.OSITE PLATE AND ATTACHMENT CLIPS Project Description: AU.'l'lJ(/III!f1IIl1'J111Jt.J11p I1A/VA/f11f8t1 "1lHpl' flb//!/l/lnn" ~.,;t, ""''"'"'''";i,.- FAX NO. : 765 563 2003 .~"ros AGRI PRODUCTS P.O. Box 426 Brookston. IN 47923 Dale: ORDFR FORM To: ST LUCTE CO FAIR, FLA State: FL Zip: Dee 1 2002 02:49PM Pl wi Bleachers IQTY ¡PART NO IDESCRn>TION PRICE WT. TOTAL 36 MSY'S 5' VERTICAL PANELS 94.05 2448 3385.S0 36 MSS-5 5' SOLID PANELS 114.95 3636 4138,20 36 MSD'5 5' DOOR FRAME AND SWING DOOR 235.00 5220 8460.00 75 MSS'10 10' VERTICAL PI\NELS 192.00 11775 H400.00 75 MSP-I0 10' SOLID PANELS 172.49 11550 12936.75 12 P5024.0 POST 52"H X 2" SCHED 404- WAY 32.00 336 384.00 - DIScoUN'fS REFLECTED: TAL WEIGHT 34,965 TOTAL EST. FREIGHT CHARGES SUB-TOTAL TAX RATE ##If TAXES TOTAL 43,704.75 1,548.00 $45,252.75 $0.00 $15.252.75 35 o o COMMENTS: ARENAS. GATES. CORRAL PANELS, ROIDolJ) PENS. HORSE STALLS. STALL BUILDINGS J)D bl.l..d~f It ntedd ì> F,,~ F3MRCH¡NE&S~ FRX NO. : 765 563 2003 De' ,0 2002 02:49PM P2 ....J A1.-IOS AGRI PRODUCTS P.O. Box 426 Brookston, IN 47923 Address: Address: City: Phone: Fax: State: fL Zip: Date: 12/19/02 OR]);:" FORM To: ST I.UCIE COUNTY FAIR GROUNDS FLA 772-464-29 i 0 772-464-8892 Bleachers Project Description: 10' X 12' STALLS SETUP IN 4 ROWS OF 5 STALLS COMPOSiTE PLATES AND CONNEC'roRS FOR ALL PANELS INCLUDES SOLID PANELS AND FRONT PANELS Il' '8bÞ:6t1lJJ1" IQTY ¡PART NO IDESCRTPTION PRICE WT. TOTAL 20 HSlOS PANEL 10' SOLID SIDE HDG 175.00 2010 3500.00 20 HSI0SD FRONT 10' WISL'DOOR HOG 365.00 4700 7300.00 8 HS2WC CONNECTOR 2·WAY HDG 8.47 24 67.76 32 HSSWSC CONNECTOR 3-WAY (STRAIGHT) HOG 9.75 192 ::112.00 24 HS 12V PANEL 12' VENT/SIDE HDG 269.51 5520 6468.24 TAL WEIGHT 12,476 17,648.00 462.00 $18,100.00 $0.00 $18,100.00 TOTAL ES'r. FREIGHT CHARGES SUB-TOTAL TIIX RATE ### TAXES TOTAL DISCOUNTS REFLECTED: 35 o o COMMENTS: ARENAS, GATES, CORRAL PANELS, ROUND PENS, HORSE STALLS, STALL BUILDINGS AGENDA REOUEST -" ITEM NO: C-2E "'" DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Parks and Recreation PRESENTED BY: Pete Keogh SUBJECT: INCREASE OF EQUIPMENT REQUEST EQ04-1l6, AND APPROVAL OF BUDGET AMENDMENT BA!04-107 BACKGROUND: In the FY03-04 budget, the Recreation Division is approved to purchase a podium ($1,500) with a battery-operated sound system, replacing the aging one that is typically used for ground-breakings, ribbon cuttings, and with the County's show-mobile. The original price, including freight, obtained during the budget process for a suitable replacement has been increased by $150.00. This agenda requests the Board's approval of Budget Amendment BA04-~Oh transferring the additional $150.00 into the Machinery and Equipment account from 001- 7215-546300-700 (Grounds Maintenance) . PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A FUNDS WILL BE MADE AVAILABLE IN: 001-7215-564000-700 (Recreation - Improvements OfT Bldgs) RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of revised Equipment Request Number EQ04-116 and Budget Amendment BA04-l07 for the purchase of a portable podium with a battery-operated sound system COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: r..]Ç, ] [ ] APPROVED OTHER: DENIED Approved (4-0) Bruhn-Absent Originating Dept. !k ~ Review and AÐDrovals Management & BUdge~~ PurChaSingl::;¡'/ Other: Finance: county Attorney: ~ BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM .." REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: PARKS & RECREATION PREPARED DATE: 10/16/03 AGENDA DATE: 1 0/28/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME AMOUNT TO: 001-7215-564000-700 MACHINERY & EQUIPMENT $150 FROM: 001-7215-546300-700 GROUNDS MAINTENANCE $150 REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: TO MAKE UP THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE QUOTED PRICE OF AN APPROVED PODIUM AND THE ACTUAL PRICE. CONTINGENCY BALANCE: N/A THIS AMENDMENT: REMAINING BALANCE: DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: BA04·107 DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: ~ ~ ee ww (/)(/) 55 ww Q:Q: Q) (/) :ë.<: I- ctI:!::: a 00 (/)0 '¡ij~ a Oz 'E .... ZZ >-0 . U ro c Q) a tn '" ro E a ~ a 0:: ": (/) 0. '" Z Q)-O ':; CD W ~ 0 ~ C 0- LD o :J UJ , Z 0 ¡:: o.e LD '" ~ 0 0 (/)(/) Q (/) o e> ;5 N N ww UJ c .- .... - » e > co Õ , I « Q)lJ.. ~ tJ) M ~ a xx X Q) Q) 'E a tn 0 .<: .<: ~:::: :J - 0 e 0 :æ N w '" ro E :æ e c:-s ro 0:: Z .. Q)- Q) ,¡.; we > Q) .<: 0 <C ::¡¡UJ Q) '" - I- _ :J Q) Z (,) W ::¡¡> ro Q) '" ::I O~ -0-" co . 0 >- Q) 0 Q)LC) >- ~a U ua.. '" '" o~ ~~ :J- ~ I- ..J ro c ' .~ = -'" z <C a l- e .¡ '« ::) (,) z Q)- goo 0 tn w E-: o . ::¡¡ 0.'" LC) 0 - .- c ~Z (,) LL w :J 0 ....- Š 0" .- >.C Q) '" LL 0:: ro .c Q) '" 0 _ E .- 0 0 0 a.. ¡:: 0 c-o W :J C LL Q: ...;ëã o Q) C co .- ~~ c c 0:: l- x 00 .- E -0- <C tn " Q) Q) Q) -0> W C ~ Q)-o 0 :J Q) O>:J ::) _ 0 -goo ca ~ 0 Q) <ñ .c ~ 0>0> Q) >- c c Q) 0. W BE =0 I- 0:: o :J "'~ Z cO ~g ::) I- .~ § Q)<O --" M~~ 0 Z co.c Z .,C'C: aQ).... W - 0_0 (,) 0 E <ñ NC_ :æ ~ :J 0> - Q)o W ._ c "'Eo C. -g~ 00.' - W o.¡g as'5 g (,) - Q: ::) Uz ro.o .c 0- '" ::) .sCl,)~ 0 wo tD'tJa) 0"'.... ..J Q:- uc:= O£E W oil!;;: ~:3n CD 0.00 .. _ 0 ~ ...= (/)w Q) ~ E ZOJ:: ~ ~Q: -= OJ ~ 0-- , '" tJ) Q:U =tr.lo - '" '" a «w ~ co.<: (/) 8 Q) " "'.<: '" - :J a..Q: >Q)O- UJ .- 0 IV UJ.<:Q) '<::J.<: 1-"'- Q:I-a: ,¡.; a ¡:.; w a: z ¡:.; I- w Z Z ::¡¡ .. w w I-Z ::¡¡ ::¡¡ Q:O «- a.. a.. a..!!! :5 :5 w~ a a ee w w , \." -' AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. é~3 It DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. Mcintyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 03-270 - Proclaiming the Month of November 2003, as "Epilepsy Awareness Month" in St. Lucie County, Florida. BACKGROUND: Epilepsy, also known as Seizure Disorder, has afflicted mankind since the dawn of our species and has been recognized since the earliest medical writings. The Chairman of the Committee for Epilepsy Awareness, has requested that this Board proclaim the month of November 2003 as Epilepsy Awareness Month in St. Lucie County, Florida. The attached Resolution No. 03-270 has been drafted for that purpose. FUNDS AVAIL.: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board adopt the attached Resolution No. 03-270 as drafted, and mail a copy to the Committee for Epilepsy Awareness, 6670 Royal Palm Blvd. Bldg. K. Apt. 302, Margate, Florida 33063-2189. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [x] APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent , County Attorney: Originating Dept. ........ Pi/ Review and ADprovals Management & Budget Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Purchasing: Other: .", Eff. 5/96 '- ....., , .. RESOLUTION NO. 03-270 A RESOLUTION PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF NOVEMBER, 2003, AS uEPILEPSY AWARENESS MONTH" IN ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made the following determinations: 1. Epilepsy, also known as Seizure Disorder, has afflicted mankind since the dawn of our species and has been recognized since the earliest medical writings. 2. As long as 400 B.C., Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine, repudiated ancient beliefs that Epilepsy was a visitation from the gods and sacred or that it was a curse from the gods that people afflicted with this disorder held prophetic powers. Hippocrates believed that Epilepsy was a brain disorder. 3 . A seizure is a sudden, brief attack of altered consciousness, motor activity or sensory phenomena. It is a sign that certain brain cells (neurons) are discharging an excessive amount of electrical impulses. 4. Epilepsy can be caused by injury to the brain, lack of oxygen at birth, brain tumor, infection and brain hemorrhage. In sixty percent of the cases, the cause is unknown. Epilepsy can affect anyone, at any age and at any time. More than two million Americans are afflicted with some type of Epilepsy. Of this number, 150,000 are Florida residents. 5. With the administration of anticonvulsant drugs, two ~ ..J to. thirds (66.66%) of those afflicted with Epilepsy are drug controlled. Lack of education about this disorder has contributed to age old myths, superstitions and prejudices. 6. The stigma associated with this disorder is sometimes worse than the disorder itself. people who have Epilepsy make reliable and conscientious workers in job performance, productivity, safety, cooperation and attendance. 7. Studies carried out in the United States over the past thirty years have indicated that of all disabilities, Epilepsy poses the greatest barrier to employment with unemployment rates estimated to fall between twenty and twenty-five percent. 8. Epilepsy should not be a barrier to success. In addition to the normal requirements for success, a person who has Epilepsy needs a supportive environment and employers who are willing to give them an opportunity to become productive citizens. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: 1. This Board does hereby proclaim the month of November, 2003, as "EPILEPSY AWARENESS MONTH" in St. Lucie County, Florida. 2. The County Administrator is hereby directed to forward a copy of this resolution to the Committee for Epilepsy Awareness, 6670 Royal Palm Blvd., Bldg. K. Apt. 302, Margate, Florida 33063- 02189. PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 28th day of October, 2003. '-' ...", ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: DEPUTY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO LEGAL FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY Dear , October, 2003 , 6-'':>-' fo~ Ð~" ---~rl.9b O~ ~~~ r' \~ ~ f J ~ >} ,J ~\~ ~ ;' Bill Naulty, Secretary ~ "I \\~ (561) 79B-2798 \J \? ""'" COMMmEE FOR EPILEPSY AWARENESS 6670 ROYAL PALM BLVD BLDG. K APT. 302 MARGATE, FLORIDA 33063-2189 Jerry Pizza, Chairman (954) 984-8319 / The month of November is "NATIONAL EPILEPSY AWARENESS MONTH". The Committee for Epilepsy Awareness would greatly appreciate your assistance in helping bring about an awareness of this disorder, Due to lack of correct information and an abundance of misinformation, people affiicted with Epilepsy have been discriminated against in all walks oflife. It is our goal to remove the ancient myths, superstitions and prejudices associated with this disorder and educate people as to what Epilepsy is and what Epilepsy is not. Enclosed, please find a copy of our resolution. If your municipality participates in our awareness campaign, please send a copy of the resolution or proclamation to: Jerry Pizza - Chairman Committee for Epilepsy Awareness 6670 Royal Palm Blvd. Bldg. K. Apt. 302 Margate, Florida 33063-2189 Thank you in advance for your interest in and concern for people afflicted with Epilepsy, Sincerely, ~d;~ Chairman P.S. Thanks to your support, last year 343 communities participated in our awareness campaign, C /j ()J ,::~ [I, (I".' G.·, "I' - \'ii -~ Pr--'\' , .. \ l~. ,q L2-~:_~ 111 \ ,,',!,j~---- \; '111 I ,., SEP \ \ 2003 \ \.:J \ , . I,· t~_·_--_·_·___,·__I C( Þ.D:,,~:~,j OF:-:IC;: I ~.... H ______~ - ----- - '- >wi COMMmEE FOR EPILEPSY AWARENESS Jerry Pizza - Chairman (954) 984-8319 William C. Naulty - Secretary (561) 798-2798 RESOLUTION DECLARING NOVEMBER, 2003 AS NATIONAL EPILEPSY AWARENESS MONTH WHEREAS, Epilepsy, also known as Seizure Disorder, has aftlicted mankind since the dawn of our species and has been recognized since the earliest medical writings, and WHEREAS, as long as 400 B.c., Hippocrates, the Father of Medicine, repudiated ancient beliefs that Epilepsy was a visitation ITom the gods and sacred or that it was a curse ITom the gods that people afflicted with this disorder held prophetic powers. Hippocrates believed that Epilepsy was a brain disorder, and WHEREAS, a seizure is a sudden, brief attack of altered consciousness, motor activity or sensory phenomena. It is a sign that certain brain cells (neurons) are discharging an excessive amount of electrical impulses, and WHEREAS, Epilepsy can be caused by injury to the brain, lack of oxygen at birth, brain tumor, infection and brain hemorrhage. In sixty percent of the cases, the cause is unknown, and WHEREAS, Epilepsy can affect anyone, at any age and at any time, and WHEREAS, more than two million Americans are aftlicted with some type of Epilepsy. Of this number, 150,000 are Florida residents, and WHEREAS, with the administration of anticonvulsant drugs, two thirds (66.66%) of those aftlicted with Epilepsy are drug controlled, and WHEREAS, lack of education about this disorder has contributed to age old myths, superstitions and prejudices, and WHEREAS, the stigma associated with this disorder is sometimes worse than the disorder itself, and "" .." WHEREAS, people who have Epilepsy make reliable and conscientious workers in job performance, productivity, safety, cooperation and attendance, and WHEREAS, studies carried out in the UNITED STATES over the past thirty years have indicated that of all disabilities, Epilepsy poses the greatest barrier to employment with unemployment rates estimated to fall between twenty and twenty-five percent. WHEREAS, Epilepsy should not be a barrier to success. In addition to the normal requirements for success, a person who has Epilepsy needs a supportive environment and employers who are willing to give them an opporturuty to become productive citizens. Be it resolved, that the governing body of: does hereby declare the month of November as National Epilepsy Awareness Month. Be it further resolved, that a copy of the Resolution or Proclamation be sent to the Committee for Epilepsy Awareness, 6670 Royal Palm Blvd" Bldg .K, Apt. 302, Margate, Florida 33063-2189 i AGENDA REQUEST ITEM ~. C-3b DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Countv Attornev Daniel McIntvre County Attorney SUBJECT: Revocable License Agreement Joseph and Josephine Rabba 177 NE Penlynn A venue BACKGROUND: Mr. & Mrs. Rabba's pool deck encroaches 1.6 feet in a 10 foot drainage and utility easement that runs along the rear of their property. The County Engineering Dept. has reviewed their request and has no objection as long as the property owner performs any maintenance required in the easement. Attached is the Revocable License Agreement, sketch of the encroachment and a request from Mr. & Mrs. Rabba for the License Agreement. FUNDS A V AILABLE: N/ A PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Revocable License Agreement with Mr.& Mrs. Rabba, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and direct Mr. & Mrs. Rabba to record the document in the Public Records ofSt. Lucie County, Florida. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: pc] APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: fA} M. And so Administ ato Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent Review and Approvals [X] County Attorney: Y [X] Engineering:~ []Originating Dept: (X)Road and Bridge: [X] Public WorkS:~ []Finance:(cbeck for copy only, if applicable) Effective 5/96 G:\ACQ\ WP'Janet\Licenseagree\NE Penlynn\agenda. wpd '- -f " ©Œ~WŒ~ 'SEPIOæÐ ~ ~ Josephine Rabba Joseph Rabba 4406 N.W. Cove Circle Pt. SI. Lucie, Florida 34983 Tel. (772) 878-1317 PROPERTY ACQUISITION St. Lucie County 2300 Virginia Ave. Ft. Pierce, Florida 34982 Attention: Acquistion Dept. Re: License To Be In Easement 177 NE PenIynn Ave. PI. SI. Lucie, Florida 34982 PID 3419-570-0I20-000-4 Dear Sir or Madam, Our pool was built and approved by SI. Lucie County in August of 1975. A current survey shows that it is in the easement and we are requesting A License to be in the Easement. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you. I~) ð~~~ cnc!.: 1 -sf- AS '- BOUNDARY SURVEY F"OJNO PI( NAIl .t 0fS ( HO H\MB(R G-=--1iii"J,J-rIQ"E 21.117' ,," C> 0. U) ;<c ~ » ~ " =1 ?" :%: ", "- ~0rr1 ~ ~ ::;:0 o " ~ :J: ~1:JJ -< 0 0 ì':Þ ~O -< I I I Õ~ I 1Iô'J I'=! ~i I~ :~ : %~ I ª~ I PI ."-" IS f'~ 7.:1' ON :. .. . U1 ;~ .} 0 ... a .. ~ ". CXJ. :~ Õ. ~;- ii t.-I ., A, 1~. > 2 > ~ [Tl . ~- ~ ., 2 ~ :;,/ 5 a .;:;.' ~ a :~ O. .." " :~ ~? ~~ :10 i:: '"':z: 0 ....olf" Q% a~1 ~ï ."", NE PENLYNN AVENUE 60' PLATTED RIGHT-OF-WAY ASPH"'LT ROADWAY - --¡¡¡-,.jj'l~ - -_5t'- - ---Ð FWHCI NUL'- ClSX"O "WEIER ,.. VlALK IS 7.t ON N "'7,ISO"{P} 48 .,Q5' 89'33'10" E FOUND 1· IRQ4 PlPI: HOJ<lJþ, 8ER WI>L.I< IS l.o'Of'F / .-;.~ 1 ,:·~~~~·4· ~~:~~:o"~:~~:~·:~~;..- ..... ":::"1 MO NUIr4IER :~~ NJ( 4&_ _ 10' -.::('::: a.2' ON ......... ~....... '''.0;.- _ I.. '" ""--t.,." .,. ,. __;.~..... ..... ~.. 0::'- ':_~"""'/ '~.:.-¡,.- .... (¡~ - ~.~~~ LOT 22'........ r¡.. t':. z;t~: BLOCK 81 ---'-_~"'r :~~.~:~ : -.., '-;::-:-~~i .., . 1 I:,~:-~~' I Z ~~£%:tWÞLK'):¿~ ..' : 0 ._'. ... ."._'~" .~........".'{ 2.1,' ~ ~ ·~~;-~-¿¢~·~~f~::~]~· 12. l; ã] ~ 0. 1"2' I ~ I > t.-I I ~ A, I. I ~ :E '2 :~ """.,,, """'\ : 2 ;g - "'=;"";:':'(''=:~;''\:-::'?;':::~}~,p I ! . ~-....: ~..". ",·.t ~. I:Z: 0 -.....~~; . ,~4' .-- 2Q.~' ..... 0. t~ ~ POO. ~~ pOO.. poJlof" I I 1 -~ LOT 21 BLOCK 81 , / ./' ,----- I I I I I I I I I I 1 I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 I , I I I , I 1 L.._____ ."u< " 0.1 riff CLlMO 3/"" 'ACtI p,p£. HO,.oweEJ\ SVoIClE SlOR"QCK c..."m OL ftESlOEHC£I' 77 , ", :;'¡':'". -"". .-.-. ;; .:- 10 OfIÞ<4MAœ: '= U1IUTY EASENEJtT Q. . . ------------------ N 89·3310" E 98.85' fOOtCI 3/4" II'I~ PIPE NO ttUWB£R Poa..lS CN UMt 20' DRAINAGE RIGHT OF WAY 177 NE PENL YNN AVENUE PORT SAINT LUCIE FLORIDA FIELD DATE:BI2ß103 DRAFTER JTB APPROVED: GKB SCALE: 1" '" 30' CATE LEGAL OESCRIP110N: (AS FURNISHE.D) LOT 22, BLOCK 81, RI'ÆR PARK UNIT 9, PART C, ACCQRrnNG TO THE PLAT lHEREOF. AS RECORDED IN PLAT BOOK 15. PAGES 2B-28A-288.0f" THE PUBUC RECORDS Of S1 LUOE ÇOOHT'T'. FLORIDA I .AMERlC"N SUR'Æ'T1MO . tr.4ÞJ>P1HO I aJlrI'lCAlIDI ao 1Io/M:ftUnaI ___ ~ :I»~.!:"~=-~~ltG REVISION COQRQINof.TED BY: PREPARED FOR: SURVEYOR INFORMATION gft)J¡'OJ ADO EAsoens RESIDENTIAL LAND SERVICES, INC. 2230 McKOWEN DRIVE NORMAN. OKLAHOMA 73072 FAX; (405) 701-1027 PHONE: (405) 701-1100 WWW.RLSNOW.COM a...sls OF BEARINGS IlENtNGS SHO'MI IÐI£CH JoIf£ 8A5EII OM '11-£ SOOTHER!. Y UftI( (I «..01' <12 IIÐNCMIIII"J,J"O"£.PEJl:PU,T JOB ORDER NUMBER RLS 03-08-1028 CLIENT REFEREJ'.CE NO.: 1083-32131" ¡: a: 'i! 'w ...,.I . Th.is instrument prepared by, Zelma Simpson under the direction of Daniel S Mclntyre, County Attorney 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 REVOCABLE LICENSE AGREEMENT TIDS AGREEMENT, made and entered this _ day of , 2003, by and between S1 LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, (the "County") and JOSEPH and JOSEPHINE RABBA of 4406 NW Cove Circle, Port St. Lucie, FL 34983, (the "Owner"), WHEREAS, the Owner owns the property described as follows River Park Unit 9 Part C Block 81, Lot 22 Parcell.D 3419-570-0120-000/4 WHEREAS, the County is the owner of the property described as A 10 foot drainage and utility easement, lying South of Lot 22, Block 81, Unit 9, River Park in Section 21, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida WHEREAS, the Owner has requested an "after the fact" Revocable License Agreement for an existing pool wh.ich is approximately 16 feet in the County's 10 foot drainage an.d utility easement. WHEREAS, the County is willing to permit the Ownerto use the 16 feet in the County's 10 foot drainage and utility easement for the existing pool subject to the terms and conditions set forth in this Revocable License Agreement NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, the parties agree as follows '-' ..., , 1. The County agrees to grant the Owner a Revocable License Agreement for the existing pool to be 1.6 feet in the County's IO foot drainage and utility easement. This Revocable License shall extend only to the above-referenced pool's encroachment and shall not extend to the construction andlor installation of any additional structures or utilities 2. The sole purpose of this Revocable License Agreement is to grant the Owner permission to keep and maintain the property around the pool's encroachment, in the County's 10 foot drainage and utility easement. 3. Pursuant to the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement, the County authorizes the Owner to keep and maintain the pool's 1.6 foot encroachment in the County's 10 foot drainage and utility easement. 4. The Owner shall install the pool in accordance with Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction in St. Lucie County, Florida, and FDOT Standards. 5. This Revocable License Agreement shall be binding on future successors and assignees of the Owner, provided that Owner gives adequate notice to the County pursuant to Paragraph Twelve (12) of this Agreement. 6. The County shall have the right, at the sole discretion of the County Engineer or Road and Bridge Manager, to terminate this Agreement with or without cause and require removal of the encroachment at the Owner's sole expense upon ninety (90) days written notice to the Owner. The County Engineer or Road and Bridge Manager may, in lieu of termination, request that the Owner perform certain alterations to the pool at the Owner's sole expense, However, if such alteration is not performed to the satisfaction of the County Engineer or Road and Bridge Manager, the County shall be entitled to exercise its right to terminate this Agreement. 7. Upon the abandonment of the pool, the expiration of this Revocable License Agreement, or the revocation of this Revocable License Agreement, whichever occurs first, the """ -."I '. Owner shall be responsible for the removal of the pool as directed by the County Engineer, consistent with the specifications of the County in force at such time. 8, The term of this Revocable License Agreement shall begin on the date first above written and shall remain in affect unless otherwise revoked or abandoned as provided herein. 9. Owner agrees to relocate the referenced improvements, at any time and at no cost to the County, if necessary for the maintenance or improvements of County's IO foot drainage and utility easement by the County. 10. The pool shall be constructed in accordance with all applicable building codes and permitting regulations of the County and shall be maintained solely at the expense of the Owner. Any maintenance or relocation activity will be subject to the written' approval of the County Engineer. 11. The Owner agrees to allow County employees access to the location of the pool's encroachment for County purposes as determined by the County Engineer. 12. All notices, request and other communications dealing directly or indirectly with this license shall be in writing and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or carrier service, telecommunicated, or mailed by registered or certified mail (postage prepaid) return receipt requested, address to: As to County: With Copies to: County Attorney 2300 Virginia A venue, 3rd Floor Fort Pierce, FL 34982 County Engineer Engineering Division 2300 Virginia A venue, 2nd Floor Fort Pierce, FL 34982 As to Owner Joseph and Josephine Rabba. 4406 NW Cove Circle Port St Lucie, FL 34983 "" ~ or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this section. Each such notice shall be deemed deli vered (a) on the date, deli vered ifby personal delivery, (b) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. 13. As consideration for the County granting this Revocable License Agreement the Owner agrees to indemnify and hold the County harmless from and against all claims, liability, demands, damages, expenses, fees, fines penalties, suits, proceedings, actions and costs of actions, including reasonable attorneys fees of any kind or nature arising or in any way connected with the use, occupation, management, or control of the above property by County or its' agents, servants, employees, patrons, or invitees, or resulting in injury to persons or property, or loss of life or property of any kind or nature whatsoever, sustained during Owner's use of the property. 14. The Owner shall promptly record this Revocable License Agreement in the Official Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. The Owner shall pay any document excise taxes and the cost of recording this Revocable License Agreement'. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year above first written. ATTEST: ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPUTY CLERK BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY "" ..., , WITNESS: Witness Joseph Rabba Witness Witness Josephine Rabba Witness STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this _ day of 2003, by Joseph Rabba and Josephine Rabba. his wife, who produced (type of identification) and who did take an oath. WITNESS my hand and official seal, this _ day of , 2003. Signature of Notary Public Name of Notary Public Typed, Printed or Stamped G:\ACQ\ WP\J anet\Licenseagree\NE Pcnlynn\LicenseAgreement. wpd t AGENDA REQUEST ...,,¡ ITEM NO. C-3c DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): Countv Attornev Daniel McIntvre County Attorney SUBJECT: Revocable License Agreement Robert Grant 505 SE Sandia Drive BACKGROUND: Mr. Grant's shed encroaches in drainage and utility easement that runs along the side of his property. The County Engineering Dept. has reviewed the request and has no objection as long as the property owner perfonns any maintenance required in the easement. Attached is the Revocable License Agreement, sketch of the encroachment and a request from Mr. Grant for a License Agreement. FUNDS A V AILABLE: N/ A PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Revocable License Agreement with Mr. Grant, authorize the Chainnan to execute the agreement and direct Mr. Grant to record the document in the Public Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [)(¡ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved (4·0) Bruhn'Absent Review and Approvals [X] County Attorney: Jt [X] Engineering: MVP [X] Public Works~ []Originating Dept: (X)Road and Bridge: []Finance:( check for copy only, if applicable) Effective 5/96 G:\ACQ\WPlJanet\Licenseagree\Sandia A ve\agenda.wpd "" rrlli~~:~llilæ l___.__.~.__~ ¡,x·,r.fO¡:ë:r';, ACQU SmO~ August 5, 2003 JoAnn M. Riley Property Acquisition Agent St. Lucie County Property Acquisition Division 2300 Virginia Avenue Ft. Pierce, FL 34982 RE: Encroachment into Side Drainage Easement Dear Ms. Riley, Please accept this as my request for a 1.5 foot encroachment into the side drainage easement. The purpose of this encroachment is for permitting an existing shed. On July 23,2003 the County granted me a Variance to the Set Back requirements for the purpose of permitting the existing shed. Enclosed I have submitted a copy of my Survey and Location maps. River Park - Unit 5 Block 48 Lot 27 Map # 34 I 28 s Or 864-2408 Robert D. t 505 SE Sandia Drive Port St. Lucie, FL 34983 ~ "" -.I G.AL O¡,.SCR j ~JT I ctJ 11 2/, I;L1JCK ·'H Vr.R PARK UNJT F1Vf AT BOOK II. ¡JAG\-. )1 . LUCn ;;[)~JNTY. ¡:LOI~1U¡:' SHEET OF 100' ORA ¡ NAGf, f,ASI-,Mf.NT ~ ENc..~Of\C ~^,Wí lot.r-n ION ·'"¡·JCIJ'¡' 0' F~ D. It') RL.~~~ '. \ FND. #6 Rf:BAR f:.....c., CHA,INUNK-.J i ---r¡ . Ff.NC¡'. I ":'/l 10' iJRÞ.~..ALjf I .f I .~! LOT 27 \ 1þ.Sl-Mtr~1 _.' I Ú ......, BLOCK 48 1 C___--:f.1 "í.\::> ) ~¡' s ! \ , <¡r- ---.---- ~ í , l I 38.7' l i 'I jl I SCRIIN HOCM i II ~ POOL & CONt.:. ã: \~ f. LONC. a:;I mCK r- ,~ 0.:1 P,6.o,,___u.r-: N CONC. PAD \'0 , I· N 1" '~M'I") óL ·,---'-·~o~..----- ¡::;i ,0 14' .~ ,- . I I 0 I XISTING RISlDf,NCf, 0 3 If I I' i~ ';;3 CONC, \~ ~ I ..___._~_._.__ PAD \ "0 ~ I ,~ : f- I , i~ t£=' - ~~ ': ' Iz z 1/: ¡:; ;:;:~i i C9NC.WALK b ; N; .:..: !3::::( Vi [:.:07°08142" FND, ". I J J!U r2:¡¡IJ ." R.n1. 72' I<I,BA'o~ --'" 1 ; '8; i1šii?, / A-90 .00' F~D. #ó RtoBAR FNG. ,¡:¡P'-,'" ',..-.1, . -._,J.' I i .L C-B9.94' _-- ' , ,':'--.-.-- . .'.--.-~ - ,-:~..6.;"[ji::lO. ?,PñRtI~ . P ¡ rJ~ !w. ::J.'.W. -- -- - ...-:.~.. -2 ,,,I '!' LOT 2B BLOCK 48 ~ --:z.. ) dLUCK ..1:-', ì " L\"'1 y.Jrf.l , ',\" 1-<,,7/ I. ¡;., '.~" 1 ',)":;¡. ,I' ( ¡;, i =1t.,_:.):¡'(f.l: ¡I,;;1(,¡:.'.jI ~:.:_~."N180:\ '1.1n~ '---T~-' ~ 'i \ / 8 \, CONC. SÏo;WLK -- CITY Sf.Wr.R & CITY WATtoR ó05 S.f.. SANDIA OR IVr. i VALU Y GUrn R PORT ST. LUCIto, FLOR lOA .~._.__...._.. ._l SANDIA ORIVI asphalt pðvement 80' PlIeuc R/W-oPf,N THIS C,RTlFICAT!DN IS TO ANO ONLY TO THI. FOllOWING PARTIf,S: TRI-.ASURfc COAST MORTGAGf CORP., FIRST AMI RICAN TlTl, CO. & ROBERT GRANT. SETBACKS, LOCATIONS & CITY SEWER & WATER AVAILABILITIES TO BE VERIFIED BY CONTRACTOR :>: -,I ~l:..N ~ lope SV~vE' )( BOUNQARY SURVEY FOAM BOARD SUFNEY X' AS·aUILT SURVEY - ELEv, ARE ASSUMED I"J ...eLEV. ARE N.G.V.D.. 19290A11< LEGEND: D DEED C CALCULATED x:. EXISTING GRADE PRO PRORATION DISTANCE M.. MEASURED DISTANCE P "" PlAT DISTANCE PCP PERMANENT CONTROL POINT P.R.M.~. PERMANENT REFERENCE MONUMENT ELEV ,. ELEVATIONS RlR... RAILROAD CONC. = CONCRffi MON MONUMENT C'L CENTERLINE FND. '" FOUND BLVD - BOULEVARD ST... STREET AVE, '" AVENUE OR. '" DRIVE RD. '" ROAD t..A l.,ANE CIR CIRCLE N.G v 0, NATIONAL GEODETIC VERTICAL DATUM SQ, - SQuARE FT.. FEET F,F '# FINISHED FLOOR ,. '" NUMBER N NORTH ç SOUTH E EAST W" wEST OEGREES MINUTES OR FEEl' ." SECONDS'bR INCHES RoW - RIGI-fT OF WAY t:l,AC ~AD\A~ ASP A.$PHALT P_C POINT OF CURvE P R,C POINT OF REVERSE CURVE PT.. POINT OF TANGENT P.P. = POWER POLE N&r NAIL&D!SK CMP CORRUGATED METAL PIPE PG PAGE 08 DEED BOOK PB:o PLATBCOK BlK... BLOCK CH:s CHORD (-8 CHORD 3EARINI~, fI~"'RINGS HEREON ARE ;:¡EFEARED TO AN 'ASSUMED VALUE OF ¡-'F_8°0'1 '_31 "W _ . _ FOR THE NORTH P!L ~ or LOT /7, BlK. .16 SAID BEARING IS ·;OE~-ru:M.-·W~THTH-E-PLATÒF·AECORO ~..,t 3uRV¡:1 Or: [HE µROPE:.RT';· SHOWN HEREON IS IN ~,--.CüR(jANCE WI\I~ THE Df-SCRiPTiON FURNISHED BY NOTES LANOS SHOWN HEREON WERE NOT ABSTRACTED FOR EASEMENTS AND:OR RIGHTS·OF·WAY OF RECORD, Tm ;:':;~JI~r ',:ù;.ST l.i(Jf-<fG,A'-.~f ...)1,:1'. I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS SURVEY MEETS MINIMUM TECHNICAL STANDARDS AS SET FORTH BY THE FLORIDA BOARD OF PO(ì¡::¡::C:::C'lrHd~' I ^~I"" C"I 'n"r::'.II"'\....... ,~, ...., ,.........-.... ....,,,. -.., ............... "" ....J This instrument prepared by: Janet LiCausi under the direction of Daniel S. Mcintyre, County Attorney 2300 Virginia A venue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 REVOCABLE LICENSE AGREEMENT TIllS AGREEMENT, made and entered this _ day of ,2003, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, (the "County") and ROBERT GRANT of 505 SE Sandia Drive, Port St. Lucie, FL 34983, (the "Owner"). WHEREAS, the Owner owns the property described as follows: River Park Unit 5 Block 48, Lot 27 (OR 864-2408) Parcel I.D. 3419-540-0200-000/6 WHEREAS, the County is the owner of the property described as: A 10 foot drainage easement, lying North of Lot 27, Block 48, Unit 5, River Park in Section 28, Township 36 South, Range 40 East, St. Lucie County, Florida. WHEREAS, the Owner has requested an "after the fact" Revocable License Agreement for an existing shed which is approximately 1.5 feet in the County's 10 foot drainage easement. WHEREAS, the County is willing to permit the Owner to use the 1.5 feet in the County's 10 foot drainage easement for the existing shed subject to the teans and conditions set forth in this Revocable License Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants set forth herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. The County agrees to grant the Owner a Revocable License Agreement for the shed to be 1.5 feet in the County's 10 foot drainage easement. This Revocable License shall extend only "" ...., to the above-referenced shed and shall not extend to the construction and/or installation of any additional structures or utilities 2. The sole purpose of this Revocable License Agreement is to grant the Owner permission to keep and maintain the property around the shed, in the County's 10 foot drainage easement. 3. Pursuant to the terms and conditions contained in this Agreement, the County authorizes the Owner to keep and maintain the shed in the County's IO foot drainage easement. 4. The Owner shall install the shed in accordance with Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction in St. Lucie County, Florida and FDOT Standards. 5. This Revocable License Agreement shall be binding on future successors and assignees of the Owner, provided that Owner gives adequate notice to the County pursuant to Paragraph Twelve (12) of this Agreement. 6. The County shall have the right, at the sole discretion of the County Engineer or Road and Bridge Manager, to terminate this Agreement with or without cause and require removal of the encroachment at the Owner's sole expense upon ninety (90) days written notice to the Owner. The County Engineer or Road and Bridge Manager may, in lieu of termination, request that the Owner perform certain alterations to the shed at the Owner's sole expense. However, if such alteration is not performed to the satisfaction of the Còunty Engineer or Road and Bridge Manager, the County shall be entitled to exercise its right to terminate this Agreement. 7. Upon the abandonment of the shed, the expiration of this Revocable License Agreement, or the revocation of this Revocable License Agreement, whichever occurs first, the Owner shall be responsible for the removal of the shed. 8. The term of this Revocable License Agreement shall begin on the date first above written and shall remain in affect unless otherwise revoked or abandoned as provided herein. \.. -...I 9, Owner agrees to relocate the referenced improvements, at any time and at no cost to the County, if necessary for the maintenance or improvements of IO foot drainage easement by the County. 10. The shed shall be constructed in accordance with all applicable building codes and permitting regulations of the County and shall be maintained solely at the expense of the Owner. Any maintenance or relocation activity will be subject to the written approval of the County Engineer. 11. The Owner agrees to allow County employees access to the location of the shed for County purposes as determined by the County Engineer. 12. All notices, request and other communications dealing directly or indirectly with this license shall be in writing and shall be (as elected by the person giving such notice) hand delivered by messenger or carrier service, telecommunicated, or mailed by registered or certìfied mail (postage prepaid) return receipt requested, address to: County Engineer Engineering Division 2300 Virginia Avenue, 2nd Floor Fort Pierce, FL 34982 With Copies to: County Attorney 2300 Virgìnia A venue, 3rd Floor Fort Pierce, FL 34982 As to County: As to Owner Mr. Robert D. Grant 505 SE Sàndia Drive Port St. Lucie, FL 34983 or to such other address as any party may designate by notice complying with the terms of this section. Each such notice shall be deemed deli vered (a) on the date deli vered if by personal delivery, (b) on the date upon which the return receipt is signed or delivery is refused or the notice is designated by the postal authorities as not deliverable, as the case may be, if mailed. "'" ...." 13. As consideration for the County granting this Revocable License Agreement the Owner agrees to indemnify and hold the County hannless from and against all claims, liability, demands, damages, expenses, fees, fines penalties, suits, proceedings, actions and costs of actions, including reasonable attorneys fees of any kind or nature arising or in any way connected with the use, occupation, management, or control of the above property by County or its' agents, servants, employees, patrons, or invitees, or resulting in injury to persons or property, or loss of life or property of any kind or nature whatsoever, sustained during Licensee's use of the property. 14. The Owner shall promptly record this Revocable License Agreement in the Official Records of St. Lucie County, Florida. The Owner shall pay any document excise taxes and the cost of recording this Revocable License Agreement. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have executed this Agreement on the day and year above first written. ATTEST: ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DEPUTY CLERK BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY ~"~J ¡J I' ~7~ b,PrI'lN¡;¿ g ISr:.OO "I- Witness (print name) '-" '""" STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST. LUCIE The foregoing instrument was acknowledged before me this lL day of f)C7f)6£ 1:. 2003, by Robert D. Grant who produced D,q'li?~f L ew.'Í~ (type of identification) and who did take an oath. fr- WITNESS my hand and official seal, this J2 day 1£('}o.heA , A.D., 2003. ,i'¡;¡':~, PATRICIA A. FRQ8JCHER r¿§'/Yv¿(la9~ ior¿',,;:, MYCOMMISSIQN'CC9279Oo1, Signature of Notary Public ,,-:A..i EXPIRES: Apn113, 2004 {] 'i;lp';~" BondIdThIUNolI¡yPubicUoo.rwrilelS '""" (' . Name of Notary Public Typed, Printed or Stamped v G:\ACQ\ WNanet\Licenseagree\Sandia A ve\LicenseAgreement. wpd \". ...."" AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-3d DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XX] PRESENTED BY: TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): County Attorney Daniel Mcintyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Petition for Abandonment - West Avenue "C," Jay Gardens Request Permission to Advertise - Notice of Public Hearing BACKGROUND: Lars Strom, property owner in Jay Gardens Subdivision has requested that the Board of County Commissioners consider his request to abandon a 50 foot right-of-way known as West Avenue "C" in Jay Gardens Subdivision. Staff requests that the Board grant permission to Advertise the Notice of Public Hearing to abandon a 50 foot right-of-way known as West Avenue "C"as shown on the attached map. FUNDS AVAIL.: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board authorize staff to advertise a Public Hearing to be held on December 2, 2003 at 7:00 p.m. or as soon thereafter as possible. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: iXJ APPROVED [ ] OTHER [ ] DENIED Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent Review and ADcrovals ( ) Public Works: ( ) Purchasing: ) County Engineer: xx County Attorney: ')ilJJnti1 h Originating Dept.: Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Elf. 5/96 G:\ACQ\WP\Janet\Abandonments\Jay Gardens\Advertise Agenda.wpd ~p, 35S.-RNG. 39E. NORTHEAST QUADRANT I TWP 345 RNG 39E ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA ;;¡~ ""'-~' ":~I -~"' :1: ll'z [) ~rJOr=FFFI ~..:: ð I ¡.¡OLLlI.IAN g; F'ERSHlNC IoIOSILE ~ ~~ IU: I GROVE INC. E ~~~~HQI. ESALE~ ~ ~ATEOFFLOf!ID"" ""':-= AKE:FORTPlERCEI INEZ J!H8::i :>~~ INC ~ \ ~ ~~~ :~GROVE'NC I HA , !lTQN :¡ ~ ~ ~ JU ~~ ~ I "" }, C;:;g" I ...~ ,,,.,, f ,......~ ~ S' 19,!J ,"C. I ~ 9!1.az ......... 3 2' 40.10 '" ~ ~ ~~ ~l\JoNnc I ~."'~'H...t.I¡LlüN JEAN ~ UNNI( r.....puN r.T' ,.", ..',"01.' ol~·""¡m' OOAS1111C. 18 BARRASSO ~ SON .. " n ~I. '..;~::::_ 11,U I, ;rlI.., 11 2041 00 ~a.BJ B.~ I 44.43 ~ ~ 'f:=;:< _ HUS ......., q ~ìr KELLY ROl IN)~ I RUNNING 'H JOSEPH IoiILL.E:R :r~i:3 _ c:::¡fJlUICO. L£~ TRACTOR CO CITIES HENRY WOLFF ".. ~ i I/oC. u.a¡ ~"*- 1~,b6 2043 18 OJ . SM(i=lwOOO I ur.llTE:a 19.6 \: IOI~ ~STALLS I ~~~" 'ö¡'" ~~~~ I PARTNERSHIP B(RNARD o:!r: .... 839 ~ ~ - fRUIT JOSEPH 1&O1~) t.,IILLE:R,¡;.... CROve: J9.Q6 THON...s 148.&2 2;:5, 0 IIIC I MILLER . \354! '.A Þ.lC;Io4T ¡ ~EfT~ER 19.3 j ""5 VI .Q5(PH 281 I'.~I ,. S\M9IO'I(R 0 RAl.PH de STALLSfRUI CO ~ 1714! IoIU..£R I!!i~ t---' ~ I i::AQ"'"HI4 - SARA 1~9 N 1~IC. 17.90 <>: 17 J3 ¡1~1 P'-.o~' 2550 4678 11I.:,ì'i"è,l,lUl·IIA.. .)()HNSON lr.UIO{OOfllto. ~~ JWRII~N\') ~ _ ;;:51",;; .. I ..IJ5[~1 CCiIOII 11.31 ~I_ ,^ ,~.........õ NICI< Sll4S14O'1O[!1CIt!NE FRED \ U[ iI ~ .JII RU~SAKI!i :;; '\ ~...: STEWART I IHI! ~1lJ.ER 1110 MURRAY T ¡« ..~ 3~ ~ EDW"RO~ BENJAÞ.lIN øc"'I)WW! 1t4c..,o ..~..~ , ~;~ IrA;,,'t~Ede, ~~E:¡¡~~ 2B95 .~ I ~~ o_.\~ ~ 28.26 ~ClBSON ),IILLER~ _~:,v J! ¡~ "'~h - l'U ," ~ ~ .,:.~~\\,,~~,:,:.= .~;; 'J' I.:? ......Y!t v:;.,; i J()-tNCOó<BALLY& ~ "';';;<15;1"-'...... U~R 1.0 ,3~,:: JO.14~ I A.ACENS ~'!: 71.11 ""idES FUR),IAN {,[ ~~: I '~' J.24 _ ~a:<::¡ ... ==" ~~ 11 O"YlDÞ.lUROOCH120.50 ~~~~ 1 ~~~u~I=~i~;:;IJ)ooIt.. I1II ::>.., _7.61 .__ ,......... ~1:~è·..~RS~ . . 3" 0"""" .,- En...."'" .u "~"\~( ~ w L ~ ~ ~"iJ ; rLORIDA ~ ¡j; ~ "K)HN CORBALLY &: ~. i :.:Þ - rRAN~~ð~O : i I ~ J;~~~ '~U~:OA~& JOHN D. & ~ ~.&~ ~ i i u ~ ~e:~~3 ... >- _ õ? L- ;: rREAsuRE C~~~~~~~T \" ~\ ~ IN~;~~,;I;(N~ ~ ; §~i äi ~ ~ COAST rt)JNOAT1QN l § INC. ~ ~~ ~!~ :[ ~ ~ ~ 1I5.4~ I~~~;~ ~~ 58.38 ~ ~ ="'~i..g..~ 98.90 \\\\ ~,>_; E.t.L ~.:!~~"".. ~ .0.03 \\\\ 1~~ ~~ \ na \ ' , \>' \ \< \\> & f 1f or STATE \.:~::~~0'''0''0. ~ .36B79 '" IJU '91 QUADRANT ;a, M ; ; !I ; ; I ; i J !i i !I i i i !I ¡ !I ! ! i II i !!I ¡ !5 !! ! 15 !5 it ~ ~ ~q,.. ~':7' J"CKNEEDYd!: il ;, ;OIoA EOWAROS SR. ~ 83.36 I." 't-- .. - o ~'" ,.fA""TU", "'"'U"' þ"" ^ ~("U. '"c, ^! :,U. '"c " \ \\~ """ ---.\ \ r"'" '" "'"" i'-r1 \ - 17.!!~ "'4.28r0~965J .~ v iii~~ :.:t !J"æ:iE ~ ~ - ~~:::: I~ Ii ø~ ~ :!,'¡i ~i ... ... q. .. ~8 R.O"~ ðð ¡ulRU'" :;t3 v. ill II. ;: ;::: alK14.n ~ Q ~nt ~ ~,iJ ~ GO . L W W ~ . ~i? ~~ " 5-;- 10 II !íl~~ ~~"';¡ 00'" ~~ a" MIt ;:: ;:;~ lOO CHERI ... 00101 SURLOF'F ""~ IT- '0,." i! ~~ ~~ ".... .\\\0 ~.. CURTIS BOLIN {,[ ~ GREGORY BOLIN & !i: I.UMlE....AH :¡ 52.55 o 0( :> " EILEEN BeLIN ðl.25 mrOfSTAT( 0' 'LORIO" 'TII'OfOf"'" ~"o"" ~, ,,,' 1100. \~ PlCDSRQ.ID 15 RUNNING W CITRUS LI~ITEO PART :;;~ "'11 ~~ ~::: ~ o z :3807 I SOUTHEAST ® '99~. ¡..OIUO~ >'LA!' o I . SEE PAGE 19 I MILES 1 1/2 ...., 1 I 52BO 1320 1980 2540 I FEET I lB. TWP 3.4S RNG 39E.1 - . - N<U ... ,.¡ o ~ ~%J~ .; IG ~ Y¡"'LTER {,[ GLORIA seon 46.76 I~' z ~I:"; ^~ - 0 <"I .. '" . ...."" ~ ~~ ð ..., ~ð :,:'i r"~ ~! ~ KEG GROvES 0: .. ... 77J2 , " ROBERT L. GRlfFlH RANCHINC. 177.\8 a TU,r¡r STATE I), 'LORIOA I-IIIK'H~El WALE' ~~ ~¿r~\~~ 1.5 U I J.' 't.9~ H~I- ~I\\\\·l'~ Ii 4 BAUI.IIKER 8Il1O<1 \, U '.U ,tJ '. GROVES !J!O'ON U ¡.IIO ~ ORn,. :~IC:, )~O h 2.011 ~9~11(U TH',IoI~~ >lpsr I.:' II~ B.'. l..---'::::: BAU....¡.,(R ;.1 LUCiE T p(wO.R~SaðS ,-:;-.:.~ "';;50C.. PI ;.l~ "':.4-:""''''11 LEXICAtI INC.·' ::::¡'ORP 1353'1)1' f4- ':' ~\:! =.::.oo:..:~ J4:6 ! ',. "z~ D~~~ ~u¡¡(U, ~~!J4J6 W...':..R!WU .. :;.. ~t;~ ~~, 1 .¡ ï ¡; ~.;7 ~ T~f ~~~~;~E ~~~~~ ~g:g ;bì;~;I~~ ~.:~YJ :~ ~; ~ ~~;~ ~ J! IS.33 ;';rl;'; -:f 2.1& .. r '" .. J"I:Ž ~i ~ <""""'I"'~ ~ 7~.85 ~"i ~ :::; ~ 3:! ~ to: t<: oI:Io~ - 5~!d ~::r§l:x :>:;è:::! ~~~= ~! ~~'" ~-' ~d~" 0= ~t;:t;~ "I .o:~ð ....,'~õd ~ 5¡S~ 9~ "' OF , MOY¡",RQ I (ARt,ESl OUNN CUlm ~ .tOSS ~.~6 ~ 'CL~~ DUI¡I~ BR(Jr"'ER<; IHC '5757 TG 14 '-1'-I:iR;;ï UiS PWI""" . , ~o:~ ~,.~~': L if ~ l.ljJ í,v~: to) .; " I c.A "'D.i ~. ;: I B~lAHOI p ~ c !I '39 IIIaI.OIÙ.... . TWP, 35S.·ANG. 39E.1 ~"lsn'n:INRolcl SEE PAGE 33 31 "" .. OL "~d " 0< 8!:10/8d _d lVRUsn<JN1 SJ~ SN3Q¡N NOISIAI08ns OOS-"" L09-~lrZ "0" I .., 3ri"l'N ORANGE AVENUE U)I '9d - U 'ed 'S3Nll ~~l~'~'rrsº- _ _ J_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~J ------- - - '1,A"I'd- . ~ ir. 10 '" ~ '" _0__ ~ - 0 '0 c' .0 L SL L6"L I - os ;'e - ¡;¡ ~'Z I¡;¡ I ::; ( !>f 0 '" '" '" I~ ôo ::¡ £ '" ¡: .. ~ SL SL 8C\6 ... 0 SL SL Ot ¡;¡ ¡;¡ ~~ :: L :; 9 '" 0 . SL SOl '" !;[ ~ 0 SOl ~ ¡,f ::j ~ SOl 9Ç1U rr ... 9 ... ~ ¡; ço~ SOl () .. 2'[ ~:j L ... 0 ... ;0 z SO< SOl Z ¡:¡ c... ~ If ~ B ... rT1 .. ~ ~ ... !" rT1 ¡;; ~ SOl ::::ar 3^1!:I0 .,.,. ,." " ." ...., .- ", I "-' , , .'. '-" OOOM lllY1 I'" SL SL L SL ex;¡ aL d' ~B' I LI ff,9/ ~n Ú.ZI " GO! ii '-" !!: SL SL SL SL SL SL aL ?; ~5 ¡; ;;; B ,., I g¡:z I ¡g c g r ~ z I~ I ~ ~ : I~ I;:: n ?; o Z ~ ¡¡¡ r l.i~ Gla; oS! g B is I...t' 1- I¡;¡ .. 0 9 I~.!. ~ 1.....1 ¡¡ I¡;¡ !='. I!=' þo '" '" '" ~. '" aL ç-,.. ~~ I¡¡¡ r /.....1 153M SL I L¡:-90! _89[8 9 :;: ~ LZ"9OLtO '" '" . LI' '}. .i¡I)- ~ tï: ...0 g:gQL ... ~ .. ¡ '" ~ 89r~ ç()t. Nõf§QLN UI ~[(. II B r ~ <=> '" CD ~ f) ^ '" ~ ~ ... G" I '" o o "t1 r ..8.. 3nN3^"I' ;0 o SOL f; ::j 5Z~ :j O!, ;0 o CUll ::j ~ ÇOL ~ ..:J" 3nN3^"I' SLr I BI ILl Is, 1.,1.1 ¡;;S~;Z+Ç£~L SL SL1;Z o 5 B/LI95i'IÞOlr I ® I oor ::jgz SOl ¿z ~I '" " d' -:('L\. o. 1.1.: """" lS-ç fI ~ /,;c.. þol ~ 3NVl (.0 ~Ol L.oo .. 9Z . '" '" '" SOL ~ çz SOl £iï Ot . 0 £11_ '" o Ût 91 I I ::::: > -< :) GJ/ SL aL ~ ¡; , ¡;; SL '" .. !=' ¡¡; z ~ Sg I SL ~ ~ 6/ ~ 9/ ?; - Ïã9< <=> z .i œ 15i IZ ~ O:)O~ SL SL G.!1 ~ 91 PI ~ co ZL-:çöko h. ~ 92 ?' 06 (,\'IL9-çmt; ç-ro L9'çg çz 5 92 ~ '25 ..., S' ()Q . o '" .. o ¡¡; OQ fi 2'2 ~ £2 os! £11 3nN3NI" 153M 9Ç,"" z (/' ~;'G' /. o :)"1 Ç6'9Z: (J/rYJ{J-7.(Y)()-QZZJ c ~ "'" ...,; EXHIBIT "J" I, Lars Strom am partitioning the county to abandon the road named West Avenue C in the subdivision of Jay Gardens, thus dividing the road equally among the lots bordering the road in this subdivision. At this time, the road provides no access to the homes built on Block 4 and 5, as the homeowners have road access to the adjacent roads bordering their properties (ie, Moco Road, Corinne Road and West Avenue B). There is both a safety issue and a nuisance problem with this road being in this area. Whereas, this is not a maintained road, but being used by those other than abutting property owners as a short cut to surrounding areas it has become a safety issue to the county. It has also become a nuisance to the property owners abutting this road as they have no recourse to prevent others in using this as a short cut with off road vehicles. It would be of benefit to the county to abandon this road as well as to the property owners of Block 4 and 5 of this subdivision. Abandoning this road and dividing it among the lots bordering it would provide the abutting owners rights to reduce the nuisance problems as well as reducing the county's legal liability if perchance someone should be hurt using this as a road way. ....... ~ íílìj SCRIPPS TREASURE COAST NEWSPAPERS Fort Pierce Tribune Port St. Lucie Tribune 600 Edwards Road, Fort Pierce, FL 34982 SCJU:f'PS HQlW'ARJ) AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION STATE OF FLORIDA COUNTY OF ST, LUCIE Before the undersigned authority personally appeared, S. Darlene Mailing, who on oath says that she is Classified Inside Sales Manager of the Fort Pierce Tribune and the Port St. Lucie Tribune, a daily newspaper published at Fort Pierce in St. Lucie County, Florida: that the attached'copy of advertisement was published in the Fort PiercelPort St. Lucie Tribune in the foUo~iiig issues below. Affiant further says that the said Fort Pierce/Port St. Lucie Tribune is a newspaper published in Fort Pierce in said St. Lucie County, Florida, and that said newspaper has heretofore been continuously published in said St. Lucie County, Florida daily and distributed in st. Lucie County, Florida, for a period or one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement; and affiant further says that she has neither paid nor promised any person, firm or corporation any discount, rebate, commission or refund for the. purpose of securing this advertisement for publication in the said newspaper. The Fort Pierce Tribune has beèn entered as second class matter at the Post Office in Fort Pierce, St. Lucie County, Florida and has been for a, period of one year next preceding the first publication of the attached copy of advertisement. Ml. Customer Name f!!!¡ CODvline fQj/ !!ill 2716986 Lars R. Strom 06/1112003 NOTICE OF INTENT 06/18/2003 NOTICE OF INTENT .. Subscribed and sworn to me before this date: 06¿t/18/,2003 V ~¡ j ~..II~I ,~., MARY T. BYRNE lm'i>!! \ Notary Public - SIa1B of - ;. . ª My eanm_ Bc¡>iœi\l.1 2,200II ~':S~A Commmlllion . DD132804 -q,¡,r,r.¡¡¡>' Bonded By ,~~.~?aJ Notary AllIn. .'~~;'" ~ ··::-:,·~"'::"·"Ñ"'-;,"'"-'-",_~,,,", , '\ii"TI~E 0Fry'iTí.IJ.'Œ''I :.~~i'Ö\AãÀÑpaN,::·t'"i ::'~gIt.'f~~r~F~~±~ I ',I'1~Ìi\'.~¡t!~~:'. <I(i",:: ,."":\¡...;,~,, '.' 1< In''D.'.';ç.,:I¡r~í,c,~,,·~óti¡¡:~·;~&¡;''i~ . ac:c:ò:a¿.'òi¡ét:3i -'P~9Yi. ~":~¡ðiitd¡I·S . :1.'O:Y¡¡ ~. ~dt'.~!a~~' . .i1'W~! r~..i3J.6~rÖ~:Fr~:. . , .~1~~5: ; . ëmilnde¡d~" and'(\SI'::b~iii::ÎII ¡ ·,CoiJn1ý' Lèl1èf. ;1D~w ¡oþ¡¡'iìni'l !',é~aêi)5,¡ctiôií\fl . ',,: 's~.\iL~r,5:S¡tionfèi J .~Ie"a'\"·~ti¡ïó;+:". 'thdt"'·tKii','·'St.'tkdè.'"" ·'~~~:~s,~~~~~~ftt~~·~~· j ';'QbIc;ñdcin:"th~B ~i6r\::·ëI:.ó: t:;:~~:~~~r~~;k~~·ed,~,~~~~~:1 ~ 'f.on':¡::,f'eho·I!PCe-d:rið' di5·~QJ,ml :.' 'êI¡t"'-:~'1 "ìin\~/¡¡f.¡;:t:¡ t;.~''':tiucie: .r.,,;t~i,·~,.~!Jt'j~"UL,r ?¡J.,-!,~:.,~ ·.:.'~ounty:'c,,,,--'~,,,,·:p,u...IC:':t ...·"··,,,o·,·'''''-''h"·'..=''o·,''",..,..,..· ;):;In .'i!I:. .1I,~L9r -\ '.'J'~~.s, l:;'~í!h¡¡;..';t~~.1 :\Ì;iprn~;;rQ:f;:~~~[r;I i'pûb11'~'fò'ò#f:~e#t"X$ê'h"ûe I.i' :Õ¿¡è:yCó·unti1:fI6....¡-i~.' t,,,: '~.ij'i,· . :': .".'~ .:-' '[.," ,.~,~ c f,;:' 1f¡ilioiì:~+fo ~-'~táêciffi¡¡Q':~Iñ-:::!iI ~ :\~¡]d~:?0Pp,Õ1>Jrc:.;RIic;:ø¡:~i~ ~:.'Sf.'~Jéii.r.¢i.Û¡ "':FrOil.dê..;·,..' '.~~~~·.·:·:~f;·*;~ti~~n;;d:'"~(~';: j...~,~.~ö~ ~'i:' ~·~':};;(i~}1~.i:f~~1~j::' ):, :]~~~~~~r~t-2~,·:S~:I,:~~~~¡~ I , ~ j / AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. ~.E Date: October 28, 2003 Regular [ ] Public Hearing [ ] Consent [X ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Heather Young Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Savannas Hospital Project Industrial Revenue Development Bonds - Trustee Resignation and Appointment Agreement BACKGROUND: See C.A. No. 03-1507 FUNDS A V AIL-(State type & No. of transaction or N/A): N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed Resignation and Appointment Agreement for the Savannas Hospital Project Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Series 1985, appointing US Bank as successor Trustee, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [X¡ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved (4-0) Bruhn·Absent Coordination/Sil!natures County Attorney: .~;..., D.r h v Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing: Originating Dept.: Other: Other: Finance (Check for Copy onJy, if applicable): '-' '...I i INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney CA. NO: 03-1507 DATE: October 17,2003 SUBJECT: Savannas Hospital Project Industrial Revenue Development Bonds - Trustee Resignation and Appointment Agreement BACKGROUND: In 1985, the Board of County Commissioners approved the issuance of Industrial Development Revenue Bonds for the Savannas Hospital Project. The original trustee for the bonds was Fleet National Bank which was succeeded by State Street Bank and Trust Company. U.S. Bank has recently acquired substantially all of the corporate trust business of State Street Bank and the parties wish to appoint US Bank as trustee for the bonds. A copy of a proposed Resignation and Appointment Agreement is attached to this memorandum. The agreement has been reviewed and approved as to form by the County's bond counsel. RECOMMENDA nON/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the proposed Resignation and Appointment Agreement for the Savannas Hospital Project Industrial Development Revenue Bonds, Series 1985, appointing US Bank as successor Trustee, and authorize the Chairman to sign the agreement. Respectfully submitted, 'U--. . Qð- Heather Young Assistant County Attorney Attachment HY/ Copies to: County Administrator Finance Director Deputy Clerk '-' ...", Resignation and Appointment Agreement dated April 7, 2003 among St. Lucie County, Florida ("Issuer"), State Street Bank and Trust Company, successor to Fleet National Bank ("State Street"), and U.S. Bank National Association ("U.S. Bank"), Recitals State Street was appointed as Trustee under the Indenture dated as of November 1, 1985 (the "Indenture"), U.S, Bank recently acquired substantially all of the corporate trust business of State Street and the parties hereto wish to substitute U.S. Bank for State Street as Trustee under the Indenture. SECTION 1. Resignation and Appointment. State Street hereby resigns as Trustee under the Indenture and the Issuer hereby appoints U.S. Bank as the successor Trustee under the Indenture. Such resignation and appointment shall be effective as of the date first above written (the "Effective Date"). SECTION 2. Acceptance. U.S. Bank hereby accepts, as of the Effective Date, its appointment as successor Trustee under the Indenture and assumes all of the rights, powers, duties, immunities and trusts of the Trustee under the Indenture. SECTION 3, Transfer of Property. State Street has delivered and transferred to, or holds as custodial agent for, U.S. Bank as successor Trustee all securities, applicable monies and other properties held by it, if any, as Trustee under the Indenture. SECTION 4. Miscellaneous. This Resignation and Appointment Agreement shall be governed by the same laws as specified under the Indenture. SECTION 5. Counterparts. This Resignation and Appointment Agreement may be signed in counterparts, each of which shall be regarded as the original and all of which shall constitute one and the same agreement. SECTION 6. Notices. All notices and communications to be delivered to U.S. Bank as Trustee under the Indenture shall be delivered in the manner provided therein to U.S. Bank at: P.O, Box 778, One Federal Street, Third Floor, Boston, MA 02102·0778 Attention: Corporate Trust Services. SECTION 7. Consent. The undersigned hereby consents to the within appointment. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this agreement to be executed by their respective duly authorized officers as of the date first above written. St. Lucie County, Florida as Issuer By: State Street Bank and Trust Company, successor to Fleet National Ba~ Trustee By: OJ.JlWfl;!!-1:UÁJv¡1A Attorney-in act U.S. Bank National Association as Successor Trustee By: \l.LIt?/¡,¡{ 'iUJ/?( /Susan Freedman R1380.DOC ,./ """' ""'" AGENDA REQUEST C-3-F' ITEM NO. DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Resolution No. 03-276 - Amending Glades Road Landfill Fee to Establish a fee for Float Tires BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Resolution No. 03- 276 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Resolution COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [)f. APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved (4-0) Bruhn-Absent ~ County Attorney: ~/ Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing: ~ Solid Waste Mg " Originating Dept, ,Publ¡cWorks,Dir~ (.1.t'" , Finance: (Check for Copy only, it applicable) Eft. 51gb "'" .....; ;, INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO.: 03-1537 DATE: October 23, 2003 SUBJECT: Resolution No. 03-276 - Amending Glades Road Landfill Fee to Establish a Fee for Float Tires ************************************************************************** BACKGROUND: According to the County Solid Waste Manager, there is a new line of waste tires called "Floats". These new tires have created processing and storage problems at the Landfill. As a result, the Solid Waste Manager has recommended that hte Board establish a fee of $200.00 per ton for float tires. Attached to this memorandum is a copy of Resolution No. 03-276 which, if adopted, would establish a new fee of $200.00 for float tires effective November 1, 2003. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve Resolution No. 03-276 and authorize the Chairman to sign the Resolution. Resp. tfully submitted, Daniel S. McInt e County Attorn DSM/caf Attachment ~ -.J RESOLUTION NO. 03-276 A RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING A FEE FOR DISPOSAL OF A NEW LINE OF TIRES CALLED "FLOATS" AND PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida (the "Board"), has made the following determinations: 1. On June 19, 2001, pursuant to Resolution No. 01-141, the Board reduced the amount of the fee for disposal of Class III Construction and Demolition Debris (the "C&D Tipping Fee"). 2. The Board has determined that there is a need to establish a rate for a new line of tires called "floats". NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida the fees for use of the St. Lucie County Glades Road Landfill shall be as follows: 1. Minimum fees for disposal of all solid waste. a. Automobiles and utility vehicles, up to 165 lb. load: Regular fee Uncovered fee $2.50 per load $5.00 per load b. Vans, trucks, including open bed pick-up trucks, trailers, up to 3001bs. load: Regular fee Uncovered fee $4.50 per load $9.00 per load 2. Tonnage rates, applicable to all loads in excess of the minimums set forth in paragraph 1. s" ;c~"" words and passages are deleted. Underlined words and passages are added. -1- "" .."" a. Class I - all solid waste except for yard waste and trash, construction and demolition debris, septage, white goods, hazardous waste, tires, special waste and excluding any other solid waste restricted from disposal in the County Landfill by federal, state or local regulation: Regular fee Uncovered fee $32.00 per ton $64.00 per ton b. Class III - Construction and demolition debris, building materials, and packaging materials: Regular fee Uncovered fee $19.00 per ton $38.00 per ton c. Yard Waste - vegetative matter resulting from landscaping maintenance and land clearing activities. Regular fee Uncovered fee d. Whole tires: Minimum fee $20.00 per ton $40.00 per ton $.80 per automobile tires for disposal of up to 5 automobile tires. Automobile tires (less than 20" rim size) Tonnage rates, applicable for disposal of more than 5 automobile tires: Regular fee Uncovered fee $ 80.00 per ton $160.00 per ton Tonnage rates, applicable for disposal of truck tires (20" rim size or larger) and all other mixed loads containing truck tires: Sir ;cÆw words and passages are deleted. Underlined words and passages are added. -2- "-' -' Regular fee $125.00 per ton Uncovered fee $250.00 per ton e. Shredded or split tires: Regular fee $ 51.00 per ton Uncovered fee $102.00 per ton L Float tires: Regular fee $200.00 per ton Uncovered fee $400.00 per ton fg,. White goods and other appliances: Secured fee $2.50 per load. Unsecured fee $5.00 per load. 3. Special Wastes - wastes requiring special handling including but not limited to ashes, asbestos, and contaminated soils: Regular fee Uncovered fee $ 70.00 per ton $140.00 per ton A minimum one ton fee will be charged for disposal of all special wastes. 4. Miscellaneous Fees. Misc. Weight determination: $2.50 per weighing Disposal of solid waste generated outside of St. Lucie County shall require the approval of the Solid Waste Manager or his designee and shall be charged at twice the stated fee. B. A of this Municipalities and permitted operators shall pay the fees specified in Section resolution monthly following receipt of collection charges. Sf¡ ¡c~w words and passages are deleted. Underlined words and passages are added. -3- "'" ...,,; C. All other users of the Landfill shall pay the fee specified in Section A of this resolution upon disposal of the material at the St. Lucie County Landfill unless the user has entered into a Landfill Use Agreement with the County and posted the required security. D. The revised rates set out in this resolution shall take effect November 1, 2003. After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Cliff Barnes Vice Chairman Paula Lewis Commissioner John Bruhn Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson Commissioner Doug Coward xxx xxx XXX XXX XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this day of October, 2003. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNiY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNiY. FLORIDA BY: DEPUiY CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: BY: COUNiY ATTORNEY S" ;cÀw words and passages are deleted. Underlined words and passages are added. -4- 1 " ... """ -J AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. Ò 3§ DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [] PUBLIC HEARING [] CONSENT [XX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Daniel S. McIntyre County Attorney SUBJECT: Second Amendment to December 11, 2001 Waste Tire Removal Contract with Florida Tire Recycling, Inc. BACKGROUND: See attached memorandum FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMEND A TION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Second Amendment with Florida Tire Recycling. Inc. and authorize the Chairman to sign the Amendment. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: Approved (4··0) Bruhn-Absent ~ [.'"APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: County Attorney: J6 Review and Approvals Management & Budget Purchasing: Originating Dept. PuBlìc Works b,,: 'Solid Waue..M9r; Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) Eff. 5/96 ""' ..." " INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Daniel S. McIntyre, County Attorney C.A. NO.: 03-1536 DATE: October 23, 2003 SUBJECT: Second Amendment to December 11, 2001 Waste Tire Removal Contract with Florida Tire Recycling. Inc. ************************************************************************** BACKGROUND: According to the County Solid Waste Manager, there is a new line of waste tires called "Floats". These new tires have created processing and storage problems at the Landfill. Attached to this memorandum is a copy of a draft Second Amendment to the December 11, 2001 Waste Tire Removal Contract with Florida Tire Recycling, Inc. (FTRI). In the Second Amendment, FTRI agrees to process the float tires for $150.00 per ton. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the Second Amendment with FTRI and authorize the Chairman to sign the Amendment. Daniel S. McIntyr. County Attorne~ DSM/caf Attachment " "'" ...." SECOND AMENDMENT TO DECEMBER 11, 2001 WASTE TIRE REMOVAL CONTRACT THIS SECOND AMENDMENT is made this day of ,2003, between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, hereinafter called the "County" and FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC., or his, its or their successors, executors, administrators, and assigns hereinafter called the ·Contractor". WIT N E SSE T H: WHEREAS, on December 11, 2001, the county and the Contractor entered into a Waste Tire Removal Contract; and, WHEREAS, on October 14, 2003, the term of the December 11, 2001 contract was extended to December 31, 2004; and, WHEREAS, the parties agree that there is a need to establish a disposal fee for a new type of tires called "floats". NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual covenants contained herein, the parties agree as follows: 1. Paragraph 7 CONTRACT PAYMENT is amended to read: 7. CONTRACT PAYMENT The County shall pay the Contractor for the performance of this Contract and completion of the project in accordance with the Contract Documents, Seventy-five dollars ($75.00) per ton for tires picked up by the Contractor at the St. Lucie County Landfill pursuant to the terms of this Contract. Effective November 1, 2003, the County shall pay the Contractor one hundred fifty dollars ($150.00) per ton for float tires picked up by the Contractor at the St. Lucie County Landfill pursuant to the terms of the Contract. 2, Except as amended herein and as previously amended on October 14,2003, the remaining terms and conditions of the December 11, 2001 Contract shall remain in full force and effect. ~ ....., .. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have executed this Second Amendment on the date first above written. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CLERK CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: FLORIDA TIRE RECYCLING, INC. BY: Print Name: Title: · .. "'" Agenda Request Item ~ber Date: C- L. CI.. 10/28/03 Consent Regular Public Hearing Leg, [ ] [X] [ ] [ ] Quasi·JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Public Works Environmental Resources Manager SUBJECT: Request of Matthew Wynne for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the project to be known as Manatee Ranchettes - Minor Site Plan. BACKGROUND: The developer of Manatee Ranchettes proposed to be located on 20.52 acres of land on the west end of Germany Canal Road ,in western St. Lucie County, is requesting that the Board grant relief from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) of the 5t. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 11.02.09(A)(5)(a) requires that all site plans ten acres or greater in size, include as a part of the site plan review process, an Environmentai Impact Report (EIR), The purpose of the EIR is to assess the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environmental conditions. The Board of County Commissioners may grant relief from the requirements for the filing of this report upon the demonstration by the developer that the information being foregone by such relief is not needed in order to determine the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environment. The proposed Manatee Ranchettes Minor Site Plan is located on previously cleared citrus groves. There are no significant environmental features on the subject property. FUNDS AVAiLABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this request for an exemption from the requirements 01 Section 11.02.09(A)(5) be approved and that no environmental impact report be required fro this project. ,--0¥1 COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED c::::::::J OTHER CONCURRENCE: D DENIED Approved (4-0) Bruhn-Absent County Attorney y Originating Dept.: ~ Finance: ~ Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Purchasing: Other: ~ c..:cYY) D~ V Other: \r ..", Commission Review: October 28, 2003 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Environmental Resources Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Environmental Resources Manager DATE: October 28, 2003 SUBJECT: Request of Matthew Wynne for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the project to be known as Manatee Ranchettes - Minor Sile Plan. The developer of Manatee Ranchettes proposed to be located on 20.52 acres of land on the west end of Germany Canal Road in western St. Lucie County, is requesting that the Board grant relief from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 11.02.09(A)(5)(a) requires that all site plans ten acres or greater in size, include as a part of the site plan review process, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The purpose of the EIR is to assess the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environmental conditions. The Board of County Commissioners may grant relief from the requirements for the filing of this report upon the demonstration by the developer that the information being foregone by such relief is not needed in order to determine the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environment. The proposed Manatee Ranchettes Minor Site Plan is located on previously cieared citrus groves. There are no significant environmental features on the subject property. Staff recommends that this request for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) be approved and that no environmental impact report be required for this project. SU!GITTED: \ )uJfY---, &~ v~nessa Bessey ,~ Environmental Resources Manager cc: Doug Anderson, County Administrator Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney Ray Wazny, Public Works Director Dennis J. Murphy, Community Development Director James A. Fowler, PSM, PA, Agent for Matthew Wynne y- \ Agenda Request Item """'ber Date: ~ lib 10/28/03 Consent Regular Public Hearing leg. [ ] [X] [ ] [ ] Quasi-JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Public Works Environmental Resou~e Manager SUBJECT: Request of Phillip Strazzulla for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the project to be known as Poslobollo - Minor Site Plan. BACKGROUND: The developer of Postobollo to be located on 34.35 acres of land on the west side of FPFWCD Canal No. 1 on the east side of Johnston Road, is requesting that the Board grant relief from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code, Section 11.02.09(A)(5)(a) requires that all site plans ten acres or greater in size, include as a part of the site plan review process, an Environmental impact Report (EIR). The purpose of the EIR is to assess the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environmental conditions, The Board of County Commissioners may grant relief from the requirements for the filing of this report upon the demonstration by the developer that the information being foregone by such relief is not needed in order to determine the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environment. The proposed Postobollo Minor Site Plan is located on previously cleared citrus groves. There are no significant environmental features on the subject property. FUNDS AVAilABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this request for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11,02.09(A)(5) be approved and that no environmental impact report be required fro this project. r-YI COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED D OTHER CONCURRENCE: D DENIED Approved (4-0) Bruhn-Absent County Attorney X Originating Dept.: ~ Finance: ~ Coordinationl Signatures M9t. & Budget: ,~ Other: ~ Purchasing: Other: l '-' ..." Commission Review: October 21, 2003 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Environmental Resources Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Environmental Resources Manager DATE: October 28, 2003 SUBJECT: Request of Phillip Strazzulla for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the project to be known as Postobollo - Minor Site Plan. The developer of Postobollo 10 be located on 34,35 acres of land on the west side of FPFWCD Canal NO.1 on the east side of Johnston Road, is requesting that the Board grant relief from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 11.02.09(A)(5)(a) requires that all site plans ten acres or greater in size, include as a part of the site plan review process, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR), The purpose of the EIR is to assess the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environmental conditions. The Board of County Commissioners may grant relief from the requirements for the filing of this report upon the demonstration by the developer that the information being foregone by such relief is not needed in order to determine the impacts of the proposed deveiopment upon the existing natural environment. The proposed Postobollo Minor Site Plan is located on previously cleared citrus groves. There are no significant environmental features on the subject property. Staff recommends that this request for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) be approved and that no environmental impact report be required for this project. SU MITTED: I Vanessa Bessey Environmental Resources Manager cc: Doug Anderson, County Administrator Dan McIntyre, County Attorney Ray Wazny, Public Works Director Dennis J. Murphy, Community Development Director Phillip Strazzulla · .... \ " ,-lj~ Agenda Request Item ~ber Date: 10/28/03 Consent Regular Public Hearing leg. [ ] [X] [ ] [ ] Quasi·JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Public Works Environmental Resources Manager SUBJECT: Request of Edwin Merritt for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the project to be known as Raptor II Subdivision - Minor Site Plan, BACKGROUND: The developer of Raptor II Subdivision to be located on 36.06 acres of land on the north side of NSLRWMD Canal No. 64 on the west side of Header Canal Road, is requesting that the Board grant relief from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) of the SI. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 11.02.09(A)(5)(a) requires that all site plans ten acres or greater in size, include as a part of the site plan review process, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The purpose of the EIR is to assess the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environmental conditions. The Board of County Commissioners may grant relief from the requirements for the filing of this report upon the demonstration by the developer that the information being foregone by such relief is not needed in order to determine the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environment. The proposed Raptor II Minor Site Plan is located on previously cleared citrus groves. There are no significant environmental features on the subject property. FUNDS AVAilABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: None RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this request for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) be approved and that no environmentai impact report be required fro this project. COMMISSION ACTION: 00 APPROVED D DENIED D OTHER CONCURRENCE: Coordinationl Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other:~ Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent County Attorney ~' Originatin~ Dept.: ~~. Fmance: t===L Purchasing: Other: ~ "'. ...... ...",. Commission Review: October 21,2003 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT Environmental Resources Division MEMORANDUM TO: County Commission FROM: Environmental Resources Manager DATE: October 28, 2003 SUBJECT: Request of Edwin Merritt for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5), St. Lucie County Land Development Code, to prepare an Environmental Impact Report for the project to be known as Raptor II Subdivision - Minor Site Plan. The developer of Raptor II Subdivision to be located on 36.06 acres of land on the north side of NSLRWMD Canal No. 64 on the west side of Header Canal Road, is requesting that the Board grant relief from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) of the St. Lucie County Land Development Code. Section 11.02.09(A)(5)(a) requires that all site plans ten acres or greater in size, include as a part of the site plan review process, an Environmental Impact Report (EIR). The purpose of the EIR is to assess the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environmental conditions, The Board of County Commissioners may grant relief from the requirements for the filing of this report upon the demonstration by the developer that the information being foregone by such relief is not needed in order to determine the impacts of the proposed development upon the existing natural environment. The proposed Raptor II Minor Site Plan is located on previously cleared citrus groves. There are no significant environmental features on the subject property. Staff recommends that this request for an exemption from the requirements of Section 11.02.09(A)(5) be approved and that no environmental impact report be required for this project. SUB~ITTED: ~ QiUIV)~ ~ Vanessa Bessey , Environmental Resources Manager cc: Doug Anderson, County Administrator Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney Ray Wazny, Public Works Director Dennis J. Murphy, Community Development Director Edwin Merritt, Raptor Grove LLC .. "" '...I ITEM NO. C-4c:l DATE: October 28,2003 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [x] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT.): ENGINEERING DIVISION (4115) Michael V. Powley, P,E County Engineer SUBJECT: Award of Bid # 03-089, Glades Cut-Off Road over C-24 Canal Bridge Repair (Bridge 1.0.: 940069). This project consists of the replacement of bridge and roadway guardrail, the construction of erosion control measures, and the rehabilitation of bridge slab joints. BACKGROUND: On October 2, 2003 bids were opened for Glades Cut-Off Road over C-24 Canal Bridge Repair (Bridge I.D.: 940069). Nine hundred thirty-four (934) vendors were notified, twenty-one (21) sets of bid documents were distributed and eight (8) bids were received. The low bidder is CEM Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $167,925.00. FUNDS AVAilABLE: Funds are available in 316001-41133-563000-4323 (Transportation Capital - Local Option - Bridge Maintenance). PREVIOUS ACTION: None. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends award of Bid # 03-089 Glades Cut-Off Road over C-24 Canal Bridge Repair (Bridge 1.0.: 940069) to CEM Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $167,925.00. COMMISSION ACTION: [¥ APPROVED [] OTHER [] DENIED n ra r ~ [x] purCha~ing M [xl Department Rev. Coor. A ... 9Y Ix] County Attorney æ [xl Mgt. & Budget [x] Originating Dept. Public Works ~ [x] Project. Man. [ I Finance (Check for copy only, if applicable) Dougl County f&)-fy¡ ",r Approved (4-0) Bruhn-Absent ; ~ f!-). ( . "-' ...." DIVISION OF ENGINEERING MEMORANDUM 03-331 To: Ed Parker - Purchasing Director Via: Michael Powley, P.E. - County Engineer M¡JP Via: Barbara Meinhardt - Budget and Revenue Coordinator ~Pt~ From: Scott Isbemer, E.I. - Engineer Intem -)v-I,. Date: October 16, 2003 Subject: Glades Cut-Off Road over C-24 Canal Bridge Repair (Bridge 1.0.: 940069) (Bid # 03-028) Bids for Bid #03-028 were opened on October 2, 2003. Please find a Bid Tabulation provided as an attachment. We have reviewed the bids and we recommend that the project be awarded to CEM Enterprises, Inc. in the amount of $167,925.00. Funds are available in account 316001-41133-563000-4323, Transportation Capital _ Local Option - Bridge Maintenance. The following budget is established for the project: Construction: . Testing: Reserves: TOTAL: $ 167,925.00 $ 2,500.00 ~ 16,792.00 $ 187,217.00 Attachment: Bid Tabulation Sheet H §i ! II g ~ j . · . oJ¡' >!~ ! 1 ¡¡ ',[ ~ 511 ;) ~ .- · ow :i g ~ · . t ~ ~ ~ 0 0 o. i :i ~ ~ ~ · . ¡ 0 , "'i ~ ~ o. 1 I!t! 0 n: ! ~ · õ L~ · ¡ 0< ~~ :i ¡; B ! "' · . ! ~ 'Ë ~ · o. r · ~ ~ · . :i ; J § i · · ~ ~ æ ... ~ .~ ; 3! ~ ~ ~ ;"Q ~ [¡; 0 -¡¡¡ c ro Ü ..,. N U ~ > o '0 ro o '" '" C? " '5 ~ ü ø " .g; ~ l'\J ~ ~, ë5 .i B ' i' e ' · u 1 ~! ~ \v 88 g 8; 8 88 888,8 ~ 8 8 8 8 H§~ ~ ~~ "U' .. . ! ~ :gg;¡a ~ ~ ~ ::it¡ ~ ~ , 8888880 08 8888 '" '" 08888 8" 28~g~~~~~ -8~ _ , ,R~~~~_~q~g . .8~~~".' ~~õv~~~~~~N~~N~~~~~O~~~~v"~~~~õ ~~~~~~~~~0~~W~~~ ~M~~W~~~~~~ g . 888888;888 8 8888:7:888888g8~8g888&! ~&&8§~~&~~~~g~~~~~~~~~~~g~gig~g~ ~~~~ga~~~w~~~~iæ~~~~~~~g~a~~~M~~ , ~~~8~~8~888g88~'.88...8.·888ø,.8o.~ ~õõgõõ$ '~g°ri°~õ~~~~~~'o :7:~SM..:¡;: ~~~~g~M~Mw~~~~~~wau::'~$~~a~~~~~~ ~. ~ 8 8; 8; 8; 8: 8; 8 8; g 8; 8 8; 8; 8 8; 8; ~ 8: 8; 8; 8: 8; 8; 8 8 8 8; 8: 8 g 8 8; ~. §~§§§§~~~å~§êêi;·~~~~~~§§~§~~~§§ ~M5~~~~~M ~ww ~~M~~~~~~~~MW ~~ , ~~~I~~8"888~888888888881~88ii~~~ ~õ~øõ~S~88~õ808~5~o'''~~:7:NõØ~a~~õ ~~ag~~M M~~~M~5~ ~~~~ ~~~~~ ~~~ . aa~aaaaaaaag$g~~a$$a$a~a$$8g8aa~ 1111!1111=!~ålll!!II!BI=I~~~!II~ 8a88888ß888888~88. ,8888~8888888~ §§~§§§~~.8~8~.."..~§"~"~§"8~""§ ~a~~Ma~ ~~~a~~~ ~ ~M5~~ ~~~ 888:88888888888 8~g8:8888 888 888888 ~ ~§§§~§§~§~§§8~'§~§~§§~§§§§~~~~~~.' ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~å~~~~å~~~~~~~' , , 8 8 8 8 8: 8 ~, 8 g 8 8 ~ 8 8 8 ~ :g 8: 8: 8 8 8 8: 8 8: g 8: 8: g 8 8 ; §§§§§§'.~8'88~§..ê"~ê'"§§'§'..§ ~~~~~~~ ~$~~~ M~ ~~ ~ ~~~ ~ ~ 888888888880 888888~88g8g 8g8~ §§ggg§gg§~gg~~~§~§~§§~§~ggil~~g~ M~~~~~..a:i"'M ,~a~a~$~~~~~:g ~:;¡¡¡_. 8 ~ 88888 '8gg8808à8888888g88:8888888n §~§§§§ê~'8êg~.§'"""~'~~§§'8.~~~· ..¡~~~I'" ~~... ~M ~...~ .,. ~..~~... ~ . 888g8888888888888~8~8888888g888~ ~§§8§§§~§~8§81·~g~§··~·~§"8"§§8 ...~~:g~~~~~ ~~~ ~ï~~ûa~aa~ûå:;¡M~~a... 8 8: 8 8: 8 ~ 8, 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 ~ ~ ~ 0 8 8 8 8: 8, 8 8 8 8 ~ '§§8§'8"1~'§8.8".~"""~"~§~8~..8" ~~~:g~~M~ ~~...~... ~......",¡¡~~ .. ......a 8 88888888g8888888888888888888888~ §g§§§~~§gêg~~¡¡~5~~~g§~!g§~§~~~~~ ~:g:;¡~~~~aa"'M~'" ...~....~~:;¡~~aUMM"'¡¡~"~ · . · ~ o. 8888888g88888888888888888888888 §§§§§§'~088~80§"~o.oo"8§§o8".~~ ~~~~~~:;¡ W~..~..~~... ~...:;¡~~~~~~~... .. ~;¡ "A Æ ~ 88~ ~~02~0 2N ~ 22 b ~~~--~~:_O~--~d~~N~~S.~.~~N~~~-~ ... 'r' ;~ "'~: .,:::J, ~5555~~~~~~5~~~~~~~~~~~~5~~~~~~ , ¡ ~ h ~ ,¡; 0 , ~ . - ,! - ! ii, ¡¡, . - ~ .! ~ ~, . ¡ £ oI iij "',.!2 .lj" " D. '" ir ~ ""ª ~ Hnd ~.~.J f¡~j_~t ~~~H!I ~~~=D_ i ~~~- ir~~& ~I ~-EI~c '¡-'Uiæ..~~~.HIPB~' ð!~ !i"~i'~ "'~.~.~._~ðW~~~,~--- 1 "¡·E- ~ ¡~~~~~~~~iol ~~fÅæ~~~~!~~ i~~I=~ - !¡i~~i~¡~M¥8f~~Æ~~JJjl ~~~~~~~~g -:- ¡ ¡; ~ c( :!: ":' i 0 1---- , §§~~t~5 "~~~~~~ 1.-. "1~--"6"'" ,..... ,-""""," 1"'1;" ~§~$$§~ ~~~~~~~"~~~~cë~ '-' ;... ~' AGENDA REQUEST ...., ITEM NO. C-5 DATE: October 28. CONSENT IX] REGULAR I] PUBLIC HEARING Leg. [ ] Quasi-JD. 2003 I ] I ] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Administration PRESENTED BY: Bill Hoeffner Grants Writer SUBJECT, Authorize the County Administrator to the Ten Mile Creek West FCT project. acres to the project. request a boundary modification to This modification will add 60+/- BACKGROUND, On October 3, 2003, the FCT Governing Board approved the acquisition of Ten Mile Creek West project. Ten Mile Creek West is a 140-acre project that is immediately adjacent to the South Florida Water Management District Water Preserve Area. When the grant application was initially written, the owner of two of the parcels involved in this project was only willing to sell 18.7 acres. He subsequently offered to sell an additional 57.9 acres. A second owner has also expressed a willingness to sell an additional 2.4 acres. Acquisition of these additional acres furthers the purpose of the grant project. The purpose of the project is 1) to conserve riparian lands to buffer Ten Mile Creek and to revitalize the filtering function of the floodplain, 2) to extend the North Fork Greenway. Of the 60 acres to be added, 51.3 acres are an old citrus grove. Both the USDA and the South Florida Water Management District have expressed an interest in assisting St. Lucie County restore the grove to its original plant community. Two grant applications, St. Lucie River Issues Team (SLRIT) and USDA Wetlands Reserve (USDA-WR), have been submitted that will help pay for acquisition and restoration costs of the grove site. FUNDS AVAIL.: Total acquisition cost for the entire 200-acre project is $4,115,000. If the boundary modification is approved, FCT will pay $2,469,000. The USDA-WR grant, if approved, will pay $114,900 toward acquisition. The SLRIT grant, if approved, will pay $383,273 toward acquisition. In the original Ten Mile Creek FCT grant application, the BOCC approved funding of $1,150,000 from ESL funds for the match requirement. FUnding currently available through grants and previously approved ESL match funds totals $4,117,173. Therefore, no additional County funding should be required for the 60-acre addition. PREVIOUS ACTION, The BOCC approved the submittal of the original Ten Mile Creek application on June 3, 2003. The BOCC approved the submittal of the SLRIT grant application on September 23, 2003. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board authorize the County Administrator to sign the letter to FCT requesting the boundary modification. COMMISSION ACTION, CONCURRENCE, county Attorney, Originating Deptl Finance: :Ø~ ~ Coordination/Signatures ~ Q(J [ J APPROVED OTHER, DENIED Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent ator Purchasing I Other, Mgt & Budget * Public Worksl " § z ¡¡ E I: .~ :¡¡ I; { § ,¡ E - {j) ': ~, "3 " in (::: (5\ ]~ !? , ~it 0 ~ < UJ " ';8 ~ j n j p ~ , · t ~ .3 . · · Ii5 ~ · · It · · i ~ ~ i'i ,.,..,', ~ j ~ ~ 1!, i '" g! g~ ! , , õ ~ ~ ~ ~ H~ _I !! II ~qJ !qi j¡ '!I~ !I~ ~~ Æ ~i ~ ~! O! ø! ! ~ i i ;! ~ . " ~ ' § ~ ~ §~ ~,,\ \$ ~ . ~ t " . ,,~, ~ d ~ S <i ~ ~ ~ ~ i d~ ~ l<J..: 6 ~ ~ : i ~ ~i~ ~ ~ ~ - 11 "'1 <, ~r I," ·M ,,' ¡Ii I; I; I; " Ii I; Ii I; Ii Ii Ii 'II ¡ . lit! tii; Ii J :L I; I; ~ ~ Ii ---~-_._~--------------- · "'" """" BOUNDARY MODIFICATION REQUEST TEN MILE CREEK WEST FCT PROJECT 03-079-FF3 A. Explanation of how the proposed modification complies with the intent and purpose of the project as stated in the original application. In the Project Summary found on page 6 of the original application, the primary purpose of the Ten Mile Creek West project is explained in the following: "In 1995, the Florida Department of Environmental Protection completed an ecosystem management report entitled Pesticide Contamination in Ten Mile Creek. The report summarized a study ofthe water quality ofTen Mile Creek. Analysis of the water samples collected during this study revealed fourteen pesticides in the water column, and at least three of these exceeded State of Florida water quality standards. Some of these concentrations appeared to be the highest found anywhere in Florida surface waters. These pesticides were related to extensive citrus farming in the Ten Mile Creek Basin. Prior to this study, Ten Mile Creek was classified by the State of Florida as Class III waters, as such, these waters are presumed suitable for 'recreation, propagation and maintenance of a healthy, well-balanced population of fish and wildlife' (FAC 62-302.530). The contamination and resultant biological impairment documented constituted a loss of Class III function for Ten Mile Creek waters. The ecological and recreational significance of the North Fork of the St. Lucie River and its tributaries as well as threats to its natural integrity has resulted in its declaration as an Ecosystem Management Area (EMA). EMA status has encouraged recommended restoration initiatives that have included the current development of the South Florida Water Management District water preserve area which borders the Ten Mile Creek West FCT project, retrofitting of the Gordy Road spillway, and purchase of additional riparian lands for floodplain preservation critical to maintain wildlife and improve water quality. Although many of these recommended actions have been initiated, none have been completed. It therefore can be assumed the water quality problems continue currently. The acquisition ofthe Ten Mile Creek West properties is a highly important link in the recommended EMA restoration initiatives in that it will conserve approximately 1.5 miles ofTen Mile Creek shoreline and approximately 140 acres of riparian lands for floodplain preservation. These lands will serve as a highly important buffer to Ten Mile Creek. The upland and wetland restoration recommended for this project, which includes encouraging the recruitment of native vegetation and removal of exotic and invasive species that degrade the critical functioning of the floodplain, will restore the floodplain and revitalize its filtering function thereby enhancing the water quality of Ten Mile Creek." Secondary purposes are explained in the following: "to extend the North Fork Greenway; to extend the North Fork Greenway Trail; and to provide increased recreational opportunities that will include hiking, wildlife observation, canoeing, camping, playground, and volleyball, and horseshoes." · "" """" The proposed modification complies with the intent and purpose of the project in that it will conserve an additional 3,342 feet ofTen Mile Creek shoreline and an additional 60.3 acres of riparian lands for floodplain preservation. These lands will serve as a highly important additional buffer to Ten Mile Creek. Acquisition of the properties will also extend the North Fork Greenway and North Fork Greenway Trail. B. Explanation of why the requested boundary change was not contained in the original application. Addition to Williams parcels (See sections outlined in blue on Parcels I, J and K of revised project boundary map): St. Lucie County staff were initially advised by the realtor for the owner that the owner did not want to sell any of his property except for those parcel segments delineated in the original application (sections outlined in black on Parcels I & J of revised project boundary map). Recently, St. Lucie County stafflearned the owner was no longer represented by the realtor and therefore contacted the owner directly. During this contact, it was learned the owner was willing to sell all of his property to the County. These properties involve three parcels and an additional 57.9 acres. Due to the buffer these properties offer to Ten Mile Creek and the increased water filtering these wetlands will provide when restored, St. Lucie County is interested in acquiring the property. Addition to Fort Pierce Investors parcel (See parcel outlined in blue on parcel A of revised project boundary map): When St. Lucie County initiated pre-acquisition procedures to acquire the Fort Pierce Investors property, the owner expressed a willingness to also sell an additional 2.4 acres immediately adjacent to parcel A. It was detennined by St. Lucie County staff that this property is prime hydric hammock with almost no invasives. Because of the environmental quality of the property, the additional buffer it offers to Ten Mile Creek, and the opportunities offered for enhancement ofthe project's hiking trail; St. Lucie County is interested in acquiring the property. C. Explanation of the effect on the overall project if the requested modification is not approved. A recent newspaper article indicated real estate values in St. Lucie County are increasing at a faster rate than any other county in the nation. This is due to the considerable residential and commercial development occurring within the County. If these parcels are not acquired in the very near future, the opportunity to acquire them may be lost. Given the location of the modification properties, this would result in a significant interruption in the North Fork Greenway. It would also result in the loss of the County's ability to conserve and revitalize approximately 3,341 feet of shoreline and 60 acres of riparian lands that are important to the restoration ofTen Mile Creek, which has been declared an Ecosystem Management Area due to its ecological and recreational significance as well as threats to its natural integrity. As noted previously, this is the primary purpose of this project. '-' ....., D. Changes to the original application resulting from the boundary modification. Total Project Acreage: 200.42 (increase of 60.3 acres) Number of separate parcels to be acquired: 12 (increase of2, number of ownerships remains 7) Land purchase price: $4,000,000 (increase of $1,200,000) Acquisition Costs: $115,000 (increase of$40,000) Total Project Costs: $4,115,000 (increase of$I,240,OOO) FCT Grant Amount: $2,469,000 (increase of $744,000) Match Amount: $1,646,000 (increase of $496,000) Other Funding Sources: St. Lucie River Issues Team, USDA Wetlands Reserve Program. Proposed Acquisition Plan: See paragraph E Natural Communities: 61 % (Original application: 81 %) Original Application New Boundaries 63.0 acres 68.9 acres 6.5 acres 6.5 acres 26.7 acres 29.1 acres 7.6 acres 7.6 acres 10.7 acres 10.7 acres 26.0 acres 77.3 acres Floodplain forest Floodplain swamp Hydric hammock Mesic flatwoods Scrubby flatwoods Exotics Wetland restoration: Of the 60 acres to be added to this project, approximately, 51 acres are old citrus grove. The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) has determined the soils of the 51 acres to be wetland soils. The USDA and the South Florida Water Management District (SFWMD) are currently working with St. Lucie County in an effort to both acquire and restore the land. If the lands are acquired through FCT, St. Lucie County will assume responsibility for restoring the site to its original, natural wetland state in an effort to revitalize the filtering function of this floodplain area. Assistance in this effort will be provided by the USDA and SFWMD. E. Proposed Acquisition Plan Prioritv 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 2 2 2 Owner's Name Fort Pierce Investors Fort Pierce Investors Steve CassenslC. Dixon James Gordy Yam Groves Harold & Ada Williams Harold & Ada Williams Harold & Ada Williams Vam Groves Hyman Hendler Hyman Hendler TJH Ltd Parcel Tax ill Number 2326-130-0000-0007 2326-124-0000-0008 2326-421-0001-0007 2326-421-0002-0004 2326-411-0001-0006 2334-220-0000-0008 2327-333-0000-0003 2333-111-0000-0000 2325-323-0001-0003 2325-331-0003-0002 2336-212-0021-0002 2325-331-0004-0009 .., ; ~ ITEM Nf1. C-6a DATE: 10-28-03 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Third Amendment to Contract No. C02-01-251 with South Florida Concrete Services Inc., BACKGROUND: On January 8, 2002 the Board of County Commissioners awarded Bid No. 02-018 to South Florida Concrete Services, Inc., for Concrete, Culvert and Asphalt Installation for the Road and Bridge Division. The contract allowed for two (2) one-year extensions. The Board of County Commissioners approved the first extension on November 26, 2002. Staff is now recommending that the Board authorize the second extension. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Public Works, Drainage Maintenance MSTU, Account No. 102001-3725- 534000-300. PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board of County Commissioners approved the first extension on November 26, 2002. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval of the third amendment to the contract with South Florida Concrete Services, Inc., and authorization for the Chairman to sign the amendment as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: Approved (4-0) Bruhn-Absent c~ ~ APPROVED () DENIED rj OTHER TRATOR Coord ¡nation/S iQ natures County Attorney ( X) 9:/ /6 'to- Mgt. & Budget (X~ Olher ( ) Purchasing (X) d/ Originating Dept. ( ) Other ( ) Finance: (check for copy, only if applicable)_ ... , '"" ~ THIRD AMENDMENT TO THE JANUARY 8,2002 CONTRACT THIS THIRD AMENDMENT, is made and entered into this day of , 2003, by and between ST. LUCIE COUNTY, a political subdivision of the State of Florida, (the "County") and SOUTH FLORIDA CONCRETE SERVICES, INC., (the "Contractor"). WHEREAS, on January 8, 2002, the parties entered into a Contract which provided for Concrete, Culvert and Asphalt Installation through and including January 7, 2003; and, WHEREAS, on July 16, 2002 the parties entered into the First Amendment to the Contract increasing the total "not to exceed" amount of the Contract from $70,000 to $120,000; and, WHEREAS, on November 26, 2002 the parties entered into the Second Amendment to the Contract extending the term of the contract through and including January 7, 2004;and, WHEREAS, the parties desire to exercise the second of the two one-year renewal options extending the contract through and including January 7,2005. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promise contained herein, the parties agree to amend the Contract as follows: 1. Paragraph 6. TERM shall be amended to read as follows: 6. TERM The term of this contract shall begin on January 8, 2002 and continue through and including January 7,2005. 2. Except as amended herein, all other terms and conditions of the Contract shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have accepted, made and executed this Agreement upon the terms and conditions above stated. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN DEPUTY CLERK '. '" WITNESSES: ,..." APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS COUNTY ATTORNEY SOUTH FLORIDA CONCRETE SERVICES, INC. BY: Authorized Representative Print Name: Title: 2 ,/ ITEM~. C-6b DATE: 10/28/03 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Award of IFB #03-085, Renovation of Ravenswoods Swimming Pool to Weller Pool Constructors, Inc. BACKGROUND: On October 8,2003 IFB #03-085 was opened for, Renovation of Ravenswoods Swimming Pool. Seven Hundred forty-eight (748) vendors were notified, five (5) bid documents were distributed and one (1) response was received. Based 0 n staff review of the bid, we recommend award to Weller Pool Constructors, Inc. for a total amount of $225,589.00 FUNDS AVAILABLE: Account #316-7210-563000-700 - Improvements Other Than Buildings PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the award of IFB #03-085 Weller Pool Constructors, Inc. and authorization for the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: X) APPROVED () DENIED '() OTHER Approved (4·0) Bruhn'Absent ~ TRATOR Caardi natia n/SiQ natu res County Attorney (X ) ,j¿ " Mgt & Budget (X) îfZ!J Jr¡Jr16 Purchasing (X) ¡;¡(J Originating Dept ( ) Olher ( ) Other ( ) finance: (check for copy, only if appiicable) _ ... , '- ...", Parks and Recreation Department Memorandum To: Purchasing Department (Attn: Mr. Ed Parker) Guy D. Medor, Administrative manger, Parks and Recreation Depart~ / Award of BID #03-085 Renovations of Ravenswoods Swimming Pool 7 to Weller Pool Constructors, Inc. From: Subject: Date: 13 October 2003 Attached, please find the bid response from Weller Pool Constructors, Inc. to renovate the Ravenswood Swimming Pool. Request that an Agenda to the BOCC be prepared to award the contract to Weller Pool. cc: Linda Brown, Parks and Recreation, Assistant Director Pete Keogh, Parks and Recreation Director Patti Raffensberger, Recreation manager -I ~ It) 00 0 en' 0::8 W;t: Zo 0- -aJ en. >-!!?I- I-:2!:W z:2!:w :Jo::I: -I °uen 0 (.J w~z 0 uzo 0- :J::J~ C) -IO...J Z ",=U::J :2!: enu..aJ :E :2!: o~ s: 0- 0 en 0 0:: 0 M « 0 M 0 0 @) aJ s: M en 0 Z 0 W N ~ Z 00 0 0:: ~ W u.. aJ 0 W 0 en 0:: I- Z U (.J 0 W 0 ¡::: 0:: « oð 0 > en W 0 ::s:: Z Z 0:: w W « 0- 0:: 0- 0 0 0 0 aJ 0) 00 W It) en It) « N aJ N tA- U Z - en 0:: 0 I- (.J ::J 0:: 0:: 0 I- 0 en Z Z W 0 > U . -I 0 0 O-..J o::u.. w· -1;2 -In. wO s:~ co .., r-- It) ..... ;. . e w I- :::J ŒI ;. . ë2 e I- w IJ) ii: is ¡::: en 0 l- e z z w IJ) w > !!:! :E ¡¡¡ Z :::J U U w E < 0 c:: n. 0 :E e IJ) u 0 e c ..: ã:i ã:i '" () ... II) u.. u.. u.. "C 0 0 0 c:: '" c:: c:: c:: E w w w C1> ŒI ŒI ŒI "C :E :E :E .... :::J :::J :::J C1> Z Z Z . """"'" ~/ ""'" ITEM NO. C-6c DATE: 10/28/03 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Award of IFB #03-086, Material Hauling BACKGROUND: On September 24, 2003 IFB #03-086 was opened for Material Hauling for the Road & Bridge Division. Two hundred seventy-nine (279) vendors were notified, six (6) bid documents were distributed and two (2) responses were received. Based on staff review of the bids, we recommend award to Overland Services, Inc. (Primary contractor) and Dickerson Florida, Inc. (Secondary contractor). See Attached FUNDS AVAILABLE: Account #102001-3725-534000-300 - Other Contract Services #101-4108-534000-400 ------- Other Contract Services #101-4110-534000-400 ------- Other Contract Services PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the award of IFB #03-086 Material Hauling to Overland Services, Inc. (Primary contractor) and Dickerson Florida, Inc. (Secondary contractor) and authorization for the Chairman to sign the contracts as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED () DENIED ( ) OTHER CONCURRENCE: Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent TRATOR Coord i n ation/SiQ natures County Attorney ( X ) 1«/ F Mgt, & Budgel (X)~ Other ( ) Purchasing (X) 41P Originating Dept. ( ) Other ( ) finance: (check for copy, only if applicable) _ . , '- -\:,' z z z i c c c :s: :s: :s: OJ OJ OJ m m m ;¡¡ ;¡¡ ;¡¡ t 0 0 0 ." ." ." OJ !!! (') Õ 0 0 ~ en 0 :s: -a ;¡¡ 0 » m (') ~ (') c m :s: m <: m en m z z 0 -; 0 en -; 0 ~ ¡¡; m -; 0 ~ .~ OJ C -; m 0 .~ '" en '" '" <C 0:> C) .þ. '" C ;o-i ~ ~ ~ ~ -a 0;0 ;;: :s: ;;: ;;: -i c:Þ r- ¡= r- r- 0 z< m m m m '" Om r- U) U) (IJ U) 0 -10 -I -i -i -i :s: ;0_ 0 0 0 0 -(IJ r- -e-l ~ 0:> C) .þ. m :Þ 0 0 0 0 (IJ 0 Z ;;: ;;: ;;: ;;: (") ¡= ¡= r- m ¡= m m m (IJ m (IJ (IJ (IJ (J) . ~ -eN .... .... .... .... .... m(") ~ ~ ~ ;0-< .... .þ. ~ .... .þ. p p '" . ?' !" r- 0 0 '" o. '" Or- 0 0 0 0 0 :þo 0 0:Þ < 0 m ;0 ~ r- it :Þ ~ -iZ -e", .... .... .... .... .... m(") :þo ~ ~ ~ ;;:(IJ .... .þ. ~ .... .þ. ;0-< '" !" -em p p ?' '" r- :þ;c '" or- 0 0 0 0 0 :þ0 . < 0 0 0 .,,- 0:Þ r-(") 0 m .(J) v Z ~ ~ -e'" .... .... .... .... .... m(") ~ ~ ~ ;0-< .... .þ. ~ .... .þ. ?' '" r-r- P 0 '" ¡" 0 '" '" 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 :Þ:Þ 00 ~ -eN .... .... .... .... .... m(") '" ~ ~ ~ .... ;0-< .... 0:> ..., 0 ..., N .... ~ 0:> r- ;., ;., '" 0 '" Or- '" '" 0 0 0 :þ0 0:Þ - 0 0 ëï ;0; ~ m .þ. (J);O -e- -i(J) .... .... .... .... m~ cO N ~ ~ ~ .... ;0'" .... :þZ .... 0:> ..., 0 0:> r-(") ..., N :" ~ '" 0-< ;0,'", , ;., ;., 0 0 -ir- '" '" 0 0 0 :þr- - 0 00 ";0 :Þ r-_ 0 0 }> v Z ~ -e", .... .... .... .... .... m(") ~ N ~ ~ ~ .... ;0-< .... <XI ..., 0 0:> ..., N .';'1 ~ r- ;., ;., 0 0 '" Or- '" '" 0 0 0 :þ0 0:Þ 0 'WI 0 -e ;;: -I c:J (IJ -e c :Þ :Þ 0 ;-i m CD -i c:J :Þ r- Z r- m c ;0 m ëï ;0 r- 0 C 0 :Þ :Þ (") :E -I 0 iii 0 r- Õ " (J) :r (") ;0 Z (") 0 m ;0; :Þ 0 -e c c -i (J) (IJ C Z m !: :r Z ~ ;;: Z m ~ c:J G) m m -i (") ;0 CD 0 N Õ ;;: ..þ. ;;: N .. ¡¡; 0 0 U) 0 ..., , õ ..., 0 0:> Z (§) '" m ~ ;0 0 (J) 0 -e ;;: ... / '- ...., PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT ROAD & BRIDGE DIVISION MEMORANDUM TO: Ed Parker, Purchasing Director '-' - U1 a VIA: J. Scott Herring, Road & Bridge Manager~ -, '-'-' <::0 ('"") .,--.- '- ~ -< .- , FROM: Ray Murankus, Drainage Operations Supervisor'7!J1J1 ("") ,;;",'- .J::: ,'.,,~- iT'. Ç) - -0 .-'r-. DATE: October 7, 2003 0 "'" := \# Bid #03-086, Material Hauling -, ,"" SUBJECT: N After reviewing the quoted prices for material hauling, we recommend that contracts be granted to both Overland Services, Inc. and Dickerson Florida, Inc. Overland Services, Inc. would be used as the primary vendor at prices of: $46.50 for loads up to 20 miles round trip from material pick up to the delivery destination. $75.00 for loads from 21 miles to 40 miles round trip from material pick up to the delivery d esti n atio n. $115.00 for loads from 41 miles to 60 miles round trip from material pick up to the delivery destination. $140.00 for loads from 61 miles to 80 miles round trip from material pick up to the delivery destination. $170.00 for loads from 81 miles to 100 miles round trip from material pick up to the delivery destination. Dickerson Florida, Inc. would be used as an alternate at prices of: $78.00 for loads up to 20 miles round trip from material pick up to the delivery destination. $109.00 for loads from 21 miles to 40 miles round trip from material pick up to the delivery destination. $137.00 for loads from 41 miles to 60 miles round trip from material pick up to the delivery destination. · \w ....¡ Page - 2 - Bid #03-086, Material Hauling $182.25 for loads from 61 miles to 80 miles round trip from material pick up to the delivery destination. $273.25 for loads from 81 miles to 100 miles round trip from material pick up to the delivery destination. RTM/sb cc: Dewey Hudman, Assistant Road and Bridge Manager " ~ ...." ITEM NO. C-6d DATE: 10/28/03 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Award of IFB #03-094, Walton Road Annex Data & Telecommunication Cabling (Re- Bid) to Universal Cabling Systems, Inc. BACKGROUND: On October 8, 2003 IFB #03-094 was opened for, Walton Road Annex Data & Telecommunication Cabling (Re-Bid). Eight Hundred ninety-three (893) vendors were notified, forty- four (44) bid documents were distributed and five (5) responses were received. Based on staff review of the bids, we recommend award to Universal Cabling Systems, Inc. for $45,074.00. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Account #316-1930-562000-1605 _ Buildings PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the award of IFB #03-094 Walton Road Annex Data & Telecommunication Cabling (Re-Bid) to Universal Cabling Systems, Inc. and authorization for the Chairman to sign the contract as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: ~) APPROVED () DENIED -( ) OTHER CONCURRENCE: Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent {; RA TOR Coord i nation/Si¡¡ natures County Attorney (X ) O-y/ ,~fl Mgt. & Budget (X) Û-£J-fr¡frJt;; Purchasing (X) Glf Originating Dept. ( ) Olher ( ) Other ( ) finance: (check for copy, only if applicable) _ ./ z z ~ ~ c c ~ S S S c. ~ ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ 3 m m m ., ;U ;U ;U ~ c. 0 0 0 '" õ> "TI "TI "TI ~ ¡¡¡ ¡¡¡ () ¡-, 0 0 0 0 3 en S 0 "U ;U 0 :Þ m () z () c m S m <: m en m z z 0 -; 0 en ::j 0 "TI en m -; 0 ~ . ¡¡¡ C -; m 0 . '" .þ. '" '" .þ. w -I-i GJ-i tD'- "UG) ;:EC J>-i ;U:r:: O:Þ Om mz S:S: mm no ;e;tJ C/)- "U_ m J>m -1m -;< J>- z"'O "Um - z tD;tJ ;e" C/)r ~0 mm ~o :-'" J>;tJ rCJ rCJ Os: rO S::Þ .-1 _ ~s: s:º _z s: tDr 00 "TIC ñi:- m" rz - Z ~:Þ " " ~" :I:ro < 0 - r ;tJ :Þ "TI_ m :::! rz Z "'0 G) 0 0 0 0 ~ z CJ CJ -< ;tJ CJ Z -i 0 m z " s: CJ - z " -II> -II> -II> -II> -II> ro 0:> "" "" .þ. .þ. :Þ (0 ->. 0 '" 01 -:¡,., :..¡ 0 CJ "" 0 m 0 '" 01 '" "" 0 0 0:> W f>- ro 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 :Þ 0 0 r-i -II> -II> -II> -II> -II> 00 I\) ->. ->. ->. "z "" .þ. I\) 0:> I\) :Þ:Þ 0 01 01 f>- I\) -ir 0 0 0 '" 0 0"'0 0 0 0 '" 0 zm CJ ;tJ 0 ~ :Þ o "'" () ~ '1J m m z r Z -i -i m ::0 0 0 » z r en ;0 0 m 0 () ;0 » -i < 0 0 » OJ () m m z ::0 en Z m co >< N 0 0 » 0 ~ w @ f(o w -i 0 m OJ r 0 m -i0 '1J () »» s 0 OJ;o s c:o S rO c: ~."en z -()-i o . () zOr » c:c: ::! enZ() 0 :I:~- m m z m()() en () -i00 . s c: » OJs:z OJ 6-~ r z :;ten o~ G> wo - bz ::0 tOm m .þ..;o I OJ en - 0 - / "'" ..." Page 1 of 1 Edward Parker - Re: Request From: To: Date: Subject: Paul Julin Desiree Cimino; Edward Parker 10/14/2003 8:35 AM Re: Request I recommend that we award the bid to Universal Cabling Systems, Inc. for the amount of $ 45,074.00 »> Desiree Cimino 10/13/03 03:45PM »> Paul, Ed would like for you to send him a letter on who you are going to recommend for Walton Road Cabling Bid. He would like to get it on the Oct. 28th agenda. Please let me know what you are going to do on this, Thank you, Desiree file://C :\Documents%20and%20Settings\parkere\Local %20Settings\ Temp\GW} 0000 l,H... 10/14/2003 / ...., ITEM NO. C-6e DATE: 10/28/03 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR ( ) PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY: Purchasing Department Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Permission to advertise Invitation for Bid for Cleaning Services at the Thomas J. White Stadium. BACKGROUND: To solicit bids for Cleaning Services at the Thomas J. White Stadium. FUNDS AVAilABLE: . 461-75201-534000-700 PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends approval for the request for permission to advertise Invitation for Bid for Cleaning Services at the Thomas J. White Stadium. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: ~ APPROVED () DENIED ( ) OTHER d (4 0) Bruhn·Absent Approve . Coord i n ation/S ia natu res County Attorney (X) "'>S,f' ,j H'\ Originating Dept. ( ) Mgt. & Budget () !dO' m1!ß; Purchasing (X) /~ t Other ( ) Other ( ) Finance, (check for copy, only if applicable)_ ..... ", '" ..." Parks and Recreation Department Memorandum To: Ed Parker, Purchasing Director Linda Brown, Assistant Director ~._.. From: Subject: T.J. White Stadium - Cleaning Services Date: October 22, 2003 We would like to proceed with a Request for Bid for cleaning services at T.J. White Stadium. The scope of services has been provided to your department. LB:emw cc: P. Keogh. Director R. Totten, Senior Buyer Chron File \-/ ~ ( , AGENDA REQUEST ..."" ITEM NO. C - 7 DATE: October 28, 2003 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [ X ] PRESENTED BY: St. Lucie County . ,Yi.'-_ INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT!.!., on ·Florida's Treasure Còašt' - , TO: ,BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: Airport Paul Phillips SUBJECT: Accept the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement (JPA); authorize the Chairman to execute the JPA and Resolution 03-272 authorizing the Chairman to sign the agreement; approve budget aj11endment 04-109 and reallocation of funds in the amount of $95,386 from the Parallel Runway Design project to provide supplemental funding for the construction of access roadways in Phase Two of Airport Industrial Park West at St. Lucie County IIifemational Airport. This JP A provides for an additional $600,000 ofFDOT dollars as a 50% match with the Airport. . BACKGROUND: For the past two :(iscal years the Board of County Commissioners have funded the design and construction of Airport West Commerce Park. This commerce park slated to begin construction in 2004 will be designed to house large warehouse proj ects. Last month, the airport was notified that the commerce þark project was eligible for some additional dollars included in the Florida Department of Transportation'(FDOT) inter-modal transportation fund. The additional money requires a 50 percent match from the loèal sponsor. S¡rtce the Board had previously funded additional airport funds towards the construction ofthis commerce park, there are dollars available to meet the 50 percent match required under the JP A. As depicted in staffs report on the next page this brings the total funding commitment by the Board and FDOT to $2,676,654. : FUNDS AVAILABLE IN ACCT#: Matching funds of $600,000 will be made available in the Airport Industrial Park West Development Improvement account (140322-4220-563000-48004) from the following: FY 03 $76,654 excess funds; FY 04 $377,5IO Board allocated excess funds (140-42IO-563000- 400); FY 04 $50,000 Airport Fund Contingency (see Budget Amendment BA04- I09); FY04 $95,836 from Parallel Runway Design project (140-4210-563000-400). Additional funds for design may be need in the summer of2004 based on the receipt of funds from the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). PREVIOUS ACTION: n/a RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board accept the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement (JPA), and authorize the Chairman to execute the JP A and Resolution 03-272 authorizing the Chairman to sign the agreement and budget amendment 04- I 09 to provide supplemental funding for the construction of access roadways in Phase Two of Airport IndustriaI Park West at St..Lucie County International Airport. This JPA provides for an additional $600,000 of FDOT d¿llars as a 50% match with the Airport. COMMISSION ACTION: )( ]APPROVED [ ]DENIED [ ]OTHER: CONCURRENCE: Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent Reviews & AIJIJrovalsa./J'{) c//y)rn 6 County AttorneY:~oMB V¿-, Originating Dept: . Other: Finance:(Check fo p n, if applicable) Purch mg Other: '-' ....I ! " St Lucie County . ."',: INTERNATIONAL AIRPOIlTdi!: -cin Ffoildäis Ti.easür-ë"Cõäsf - . " Staff Report from St. Lucie County International Airport To: Board of County Commissioners From: Paul A. Phillips"Airport Director Re: Airport West Commerce Park /;.; .-~ , For the past two fiscal years the Board,öfCounty Commissioners have funded the design and construction of Airport Industrial Park West. This'industrial park slated to begin construction in 2003 will be designed to house large warehouse projects. Last month, the airport was notified that the industrial park project was eligible for somè additional dollars irtcluded in the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) intermodal traÌlsportation fi¡nd;"The additional money requires a 50 percent match ITom the local sponsor. Since the Board had previously funded an additional $276,654 of airport funds (airport land loan payback funds) towards the construction ofthis industrial park, there are dollars available to meet the 50 percent match required under the JP A. As depicted in the followipg chart this brings the total funding commitment by the Board and FDOT to $3,800,000. The following cnart depicts the funding available for this project. Funding Source County Funds Aviation Match Intermodal Match Excess Reserves FUNDS FROM AIRPORTCONTINGENCY FUNDS FROM PARALLEL RW DESIGN FDOT Funds Aviation Intermodal Proposed EDA Grant Subtotals Total Funds Available Total Funds (Available and Proposed) Funds Availablè Funds Availabie FY 01/02 FY 02/03 Funds Proposed FY 03/04 $550,000 $550,000 $200,000 $76,654 Matching funds for $600,000 are highlighted in bold $377,510 $50,000 $95,836 $550,000 $550,000 $200,000 $600,000 $2,000,000 $3,123,346 $1,100,000 $1,576,654 $2.676,654 $5,800,000 $76,654 == Excess Cany Forward Balance $377,510 = CUrTent Budget Year Request $600,000 ~ Intermodal Match ~ (FY OV03 $76,654 + FY 03/04 $145.836 + FY 03/04 $377,510) EDA =' Economic Development Administration If you have any questions or require any additional information, please do not hesitate to contact me. iii... ,¡ , , BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: AIRPORT PREPARED DATE: 10/23/03 AGENDA DATE: 10/28/03 , ". ···"~'";'··j;·.r'·~ACCOUNT .NUMBER " ." .,." ·".-.i"'·"'c"ACCOUNINAME..,·,·".';"'.·'t,;¡¡:¡../·..·,!,.',4..i;."AMOUl\!T"".,;c"·r~' ,......."'-".""'... "¡¡"~_">'-oiM. '-_4,,~,_,_,<_,_,"'~.___b,..._" __.-'·.~,<-·~~...'_p,',,^.,~.~.,·."".'""'">" .~"'_..,". .~,_~, ._. ___ "'_ _~.....,"",,,,_'.""'j"_)<. ."",<_,,,,..~;¡;;.._Ac~"....,...._.__.~ ",.."".""",,,~,~ _..' TO: 140322-4220·563000-48004 IMPROVEMENTS orr BLDGS $50,000 .. " ¡Y,; " FROM: 140-9910-599100,800 CONTINGENCY $50,000 \ , . , , , , : - REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: TO COVER ADDITIONAL LOCAL MATCH FOR THE INDUSTRIAL PARK WEST. .- CONTINGENCY BALANCE: $50,000 THIS AMENDMENT: $50,000 , REMAINING BALANCE: $0 DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: OMB APPROVAL: fr1¿} BUDGET AMENDMENT #: BA04·109 DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: '-' """ I" FISCAL YEAR 2003·2004 FUNDS APPROVED FROM CONTINGENCY GENERAL FUND . AIRPORT AMOUNT REMAINING: $50,000 DEPARTMENT ITEM . ACCOUNT # AMOUNT DATE Approved Budget Contingency 140-9910-599100-800 50,000 0 ?,",.{.", , .,. \ . ", '" Total used: Balance Available $0 $50,000 Proposed action: BA04·109 INDUSTRIAL PARK WEST 140322-4220·563000-48004 $50,000 10/28/03 Balance Available After Proposed Action: $0 '-' ....I I" RESOLUTION NO. 03-272 A RESOLUTION ACCEPTING THE STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT (FIN. PROJ. NO. 412313-1-94-01) FOR ST. LUCIE COUNTY INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT - ACCESS ROADWAYS AND AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRPERSON TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT AND FURTHER AUTHORIZING THE COUNTY ATTORNEY TO EXEG:UTE THE AGREEMENT BY APPROVING IT AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS ":' WHEREAS, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has 'made the following determinations: 1, The Florida Department of Transportation has awarded the County funding for Access Roadways at the St: Lucie County International Airport (Fin. Proj. No. 412313-1-94-01 ). . . 2.. The Board s~uld,authorize and approve execution of the Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement with the State of Florida Department of Transportation for the above-referenced project. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida: 1. The Board hereby accepts and approves the State of Florida Department of Transportation Supplemental Joint Participation Agreement (Fin. Proj. No. 411315-1- 94·01) to provide funding for access roadways at the St. Lucie County International .Airport. 2. The Board hereby authorizes the Chairperson to execute the above- referenced agreement and further authorizes the County Attorney to execute the agreement by approving it as to form and correctness. I "" I" ~ After motion and second, the vote on this resolution was as follows: Chairman Cliff Barnes XXXX Vice-Chairman Paula Lewis XXXX Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson XXXX Commissioner Doug Coward XXXX Commfssioner John D. Bruhn XXXX ,,;.-;.... PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED this 21th day of October 2003. ATTEST: . BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA \ .... ......... BY: CHAIRPERSON DEPUTY CLERK APPROVED AS to FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY 2 '- ....; , " STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTAOON PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT Number 1 ==<>7 PUBlIC TRANSPORTATlON OWl PaQo1ofJiL.} Financial Project No.: Fund: DDR FLAIR Approp.: 088809 41231319401 637 FLAIR Obj.: 750098 (rtem-segment..p~se-sequence) Function: Org. Code: 55042010429 Contract No.: AM938 Federal No.: Vendor No.: 596000835030 Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance Number. Catalog of State Financial Assistance Number. \ THIS AGREEMENT, made and enter~d into this day of by and between the STATE OF FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, an agency of the State of Florida, hereinafter referred to as the Department, and SI. Lucie County BCC - SI. Lucie County International Airport 1':<..- 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierèe, Florida 34982-5652 hereinafter referred to as Agency. " , WITNESSETH: . . WHEREAS, the, Department and the Agency heretofore on the 31st . entered into a JoiñtParticipation Agfeem~'ot; and WHEREAS, the Agency desires to accomplish certain project items as outlined in the Attachment "A" appended hereto; and . . day of January 2003 WHEREAS, the Department desires to participate in all eligible items for this project as outlined in Attachment "A" for a total Department Share of $800,000.00 NOW, THEREFORE THIS INDENTURE WITNESSETH: that for and in consideration of the mutual benefits to flow from each to the other, the parties hereto agree that the above described Joint Participation Agreement is to be amended and supplemented as follows: 1.00 Project Description: The project description is amended to provide additional funding for the construction of access roadways in Phase Two of Airport Industrial Park West at the SI. Lucie County International Airport. ""'" ...,¡ r .¡. 725-030-<!7 PUBUC TRANSPORTATION 07102 Pa¡:¡e2ofW't 2.00 Project Cost: Paragraph 3.00 of said Agreement is increased by $ 1,200,000.00 bringing the revis¡¡d total cost of the project to $ 1,600,000.00 Paragraph 4.00 of said Agreement is increased by $ 600;000.00 bringing the Departmenfs revised total cost of the project to $ 800,000.00 3.00 Amended Exhibits: Exhibit(s) 8 of said Agreement is amended by Attachment "A". 4.00 Contract Time: Paragraph 18.00 of said Agreement December 31st, 2004 ?'<".. , , \. . ", -" '--' ""'" I!' 725-03Q..( 7 PUBlIC TRANSPORTATION 07102 Palle 3 o!ß" Financial Project No. 41231319401 Contract No. AM938 Agreement Date Except as hereby modified, amended or changed, all other terms of said Agreement dated January 31st, 2003 and any subsequent supplements shall remain in full force and effect. IN WITNESS WHEREdF, the partie~ hereto have caused these presents to be executed, the day and year first above written. 1"-'-; ."", , AGENCY , FDOT st. Lucie County BCC - St. Lucie County International Air AGENCY NAME See attached Encumbrance Form for date of Funding Approval by Comptroller ., -, SIGNATORY (PRImED OR 'TYPED) LEGAl REVIEW DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTA nON SIGNATURE ~ DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATlON TITLE TitlE "",. I" ...; 725œC><>7 PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION 07102 Pa¡:¡e4of5'of Financial Project No. Contract No. AM938 41231319401 Agreement Date ATTACHMENT "A" SUPPLEMENTAL JOINT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT This Attachment forms an integral part of that certain Supplemental Joint Particípation Agreement between \ the State of Florida, Department of Transportation and SI. Lucie County BCC _ SI. Lucie County International Airport 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce; Florida 34982-5652 dated I',{.~ , DESCRIPTION OF SUPPLEMENT (Include justification for cost change): Additional funding available through the Interm6dal program to continue assisting SI. Lucie County in improving access to the SI. Lucie County Intenational Airport. \. . I. Project Cost: '. " , As Approved As Amended $400,000.00 $1,600,000.00 $400,000.00 $1,600,000.00 As Approved As Amended $200,000.00 $800,000.00 $200,000.00 $800,000.00 Net Change $1,200,000.00 Total Project Cost $1,200,000.00 I. Fund Particípation: Net Change Department: Agency: Other: Total Project Cost $400,000.00 $1,600,000.00 $600,000.00 $600,000.00 $0.00 $1,200,000.00 Comments: / y '-' ..." AGENDA REOUEST ITEM NO. C-8 DATE: October 28,2003 REGULAR [ PUBLIC HEARING [ CONSENT [ X ] TO: ST. LUCIE COUNTY BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY: OMB PRESENTED BY: Marie M. Gouin SUBJECT: Joint Participation Agreement BACKGROUND: The Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) has approved a Joint Participation Agreement (JP A) with the Board to assist in funding the acquisition of additional land for the Port of Fort Pierce and a planning study for a 'mega' yacht facility. The agreement cans for a 50/50 match with each signatory providing $472,000 toward the projects. The Board's matching funds have been identified and win come ITom the approved Port budget. Budget Resolution 03-274 establishes a budget for the JP A. FUNDS AVAILABLE: See Attached Budget Resolution 03-274 PREVIOUS ACTION: July 3, 2003 - Staff sent a letter requesting FDOT enter into a JPA with the Board for port acquisition funding. August 12, 2003 - The Board approved the JP A August 19,2003 - The Board adopted Resolution 03-191 accepting the JPA RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve Budget Resolution 03-274. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [x APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent ~ County Attorney: XX :Þr Coordination/S i gnatures Management & Budget: xx~'r(ilr(~i)purchasing: Originating Dept: Public Works: XX ~171. r-'-- Finance: (Check for Copy only, if applicable) XX Other: G,\BUDG En WP\AGENDA'S\AGENDA04\ t 028POR T iP A.DOC · ; '- ..., RESOLUTION NO. 03-274 WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of the budget for the SI. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners, certain funds not anticipated at the time of adoption have become available from the Florida Department of Transportation in the form of a Joint Participation Agreement for the purpose of acquiring additionai land for the Port of Fort Pierce and conducting a planning study associated with establishing a 'mega yacht' facility. WHEREAS, Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, requires the SI. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners to adopt a resoiution to appropriate and expend such funds. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, in meeting assembied this 281h day of October, 2003, pursuant to Section 129.06 (d), Florida Statutes, such funds are hereby appropriated for the fiscal year 2003-2004, and the budget for the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners is hereby amended as follows: REVENUES 140328·4315-334411-465016 Florida Department of Transportation $472,000 APPROPRIATIONS 140328-4315-561000-465016 140328-4315-534000-400 Land Contractual Services $452,000 $20,000 After motion and second the vote on this resolution was as follows: Commissioner Cliff Barnes, Chairperson Commissioner Paula A. Lewis, Vice Chairperson Commissioner John D, Bruhn Commissioner Doug Coward Commissioner Frannie Hutchinson xxx XXX XXX XXX XXX PASSED AND DULY ADOPTED THIS 28th DAY OF OCTOBER, 2003. ATTEST: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO CORRECTNESS AND FORM: COUNTY ATTORNEY I '- ..,.I AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. (5 A- DATE: AUClust 12.2003 REGULAR: ( ) PUBLIC HEARING: ( ) CONS J: (X) TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS SUBMITTED BY (DEPT):, ADMINISTRATION SUBJECT: Joint Participation Agreement (JPA) between St. Lucie County and the I 'é!a Department of Transportation (FOOT) to provide funding to the Port of Fort Pierce for land acquisition activities and a planning study. FOOT's contribution is in the amount of $472,000 towards an estimated total project cost of $944,000. This is the first phase of an estimated $13,000,000 project. BACKGROUND: On July 3, 2003, staff sent'Ìlletter requesting the Florida Department of Transportation enter into a Joint Participation Agreement in the amount of $472,000 to be used towards Port acquisition funding. This is a Florida Sèaport Transportation and Economic Development (FSTED) Council approved project. FUNDS AVAilABLE: N/A PREVIOUS ACTION: Applied for FSTED funding for $472,000 and $6,000,000 as a 50% match for total estimated project costs of $13,000,000. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board of County Commissioners approve the JPA in the amount of $472,000 between St. Lucie County and the Florida Department of Transportation and authorize the Port Authority to execute the agreement. Approved (5-0) Review and Approvals COMMISSION ACTION: '~'APPROVED 0 DENIED o OTHER: o County Attorney: o Management and Budget: º Purchasing: o Originating Dept: o Other: o Other: o Finance: Check for copy only, if applicable: Anyone with a disability requiring accommodations to attenf!this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County Community Services Managerat 772-462.1777 or TTD 772-462·1428. at least 48 hours (48) prior to the Ineeting. H :\WIN\WPIAGENOA\FDOT J PAport wpd /' '-' ...,.¡ September 2, 2003 COUNTY ADMINISTRATOR BOARD OF 'COUNTY COMMISSIONERS DOUGLAS M. ANDEP.sON , Ms. Nancy Bonomo, Intermodal Specialist Florida Dept. of Transportation Office of Intermodal Development 3400 W. Commercial Boulevard Fort Lauderdale, FL., 33309 r/ 2 """"'" _ (1,"_1) , ~.qr~ Dea~om~: At the August 12th B~ard of County Con;unissioners' Agenda Meeting, the Board approved the Joint Planning Agreement in the amount of $472,000 between St. Lucie County and the Florida Department of Transportation, and authorized the Port Authority to execute the agreement. I have enclosed two copies of Resolution 03-191, as well as five original Joint Planning Agreements signed by Commissioner Cliff Barnes, Chairman of the Board. Please return a fully executed agreement for our file. "_../' Additionally, we are in receipt of a Joint Participation Agreement in the amount of $1,750,000 to be used towards the Restoration of Taylor Creek for Board of County Commissioners'IPort Authority's approval. . Thal')k you for your continued assistance. , c: Board of County Commissioners Ray Wazny, Assistant County Administrator Marie Gouin, Management & Budget Director Don West, Public Works Director Dan McIntyre, County Attorney Fort Pierce Harbor Advisory Committee JOHN D. O!\UHN, District No, 1 . DOUG COWARD, Districr No.2. PAULA A. LEW¡S. District No. J . Fr.ANNIE HUTCHINSON, Dimict NO.4. CLIFF ßAf\NES. D¡miÇ" No 5 Counry Administrator· Douglas M. Anderson 2.300 Virginia Avenue. Fort Pierce, FL .34982·5652 . Phone (772) 462·1450 . TDD (ì72) 462·1428 FAX (772) 462·1648. emeil: douge@co.sr.lucie.fl.us wph "itp.· www r:()_~t-ILJcie fl.us ~ '- 'wi BUDGET AMENDMENT REQUEST FORM REQUESTING DEPARTMENT: CENTRAL SERVICES PREPARED DATE: 10/21/03 AGENDA DATE: 10/28/03 ACCOUNT NUMBER ACCOUNT NAME AMOUNT TO: 316·1931-564000-15010 Machinerv and Equioment $2,452 . FROM: 316-1931-562000-15010 Buildinos $2,452 -- " . - ,- I' f , , REASON FOR BUDGET AMENDMENT: , PowerEdae 600C server would be used to run and maintain new security software for the Courthouse i allowina or denyina access into County buildinas, current computer hardware does not meet the minimum . , , standards for lhe new software. . r CONTINGENCY BALANCE: N/A ..-. THIS AMENDMENT: REMAINING BALANCE: ,; . , DEPARTMENT APPROVAL: Gaw~ OMB APPROVAL: BUDGET AMENDMENT #: 04-108 DOCUMENT # & INPUT BY: - > ,/ " \0....... ':">C/-etÇ'lC t",,~~, " Information Technology '. '" -~_.....- BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY 2300 VIRGINIA AVE FT. PIERCE, FL 34982 NAME/ADDRESS CENTRAL SERVICES Attn: ROGER SHINN DESCRIPTION DELL PowerEdge 600C Serverw/15" monitor VENDOR INFORMATION: DELL COMPUTER CORP, One Dell Way Round Rock, TX 78682 The goods and/or services as quoted hereon have been requested in the quantity and quality stated. ....", IT QUOTE DATE ESTIMATE NO. 1 0/1 /2003 2626 P.O. NO. TERMS QUOTE VALID UNTIL 30 DAYS 10/31/2003 QTY CO$T TOTAL 2,452.00 2,452.00 A / f , ';¡' AUTHORIZED SIGNATURE " TOTAL $2,452.00 ~... m o c ;¡ :;: m z -i ,;I m o ;I!' o "" I N ,... N » o o o c Z -i ;I!' w ~ (J) , ~ <D W ~ , '" (J) .. o o o , ~ '" ~ o "- , "'""-1(1)-1 (1)::T(1)::T ..c CD 0 (1) " "-0 (1) 0 :::I. c: S!!.~~"'"" (1)"'""(1)\:1 c.~0~ en -~'" ~ 8 '" g, ~ 3 ëD ..... -.\:1 ::T -< c: õ' (1) ~ CD::' ~ ....."'"" ::T 0 ::J"'::T (1) \:I (1) ~ 0 ~ 00.0(1) o:¡;"c. C D> ;::+\:1 ::1(þ::Tc: ::T 0 ~ o c. c: 0 c: 0 en ::T en CD CD Q) CD en D> en :"':J:JCD ::T 0 C. 0 '" - - en3:f:f CD (t) (t) (1) ;: !B. () 0 (1)...... 0 0 "'"" ::T c: 3 .....f (i)" (1) ~\:I '" 3. " :J S' --' lõ (1) _.~"'"" o 3 _. ¡;; (1) c: (I) ... Cf) 3 (1),>-'a. ~C/)%.~ -< or ~. ~ \:I :J ur (1) !:; g- ~ ü)" g.a.~õ ID,Cf) -.2 en'" õ'.~ .... ~- - . :T Q ~ f~gC.3 ' '" 3 :¡; S' Q1. Cl)ß)~ ~~! '" '" ::T ~ 0 '" '" 0 :J ~m(1) :J en :¡; O.-.ï< a 0\:1 (1) ~c: ::'on °o::T \:I c m ~ :J '" ~.:tp- ã:gc- (1) _. c: :f§;c: (1) cE 5' fI'''' ¥ ....,., »,;1 -am -ao ,;10 0:;: <:;: mm !=?z c m c tA -I . m..... Dc: c:o =ëñi Š:o mO Zc: -IZ ~~ DOJ Co m» ~:;a -nO 00 :;a-n -no -0 ~C »Z .....~ ~o »0 :;aš: N3: 0- otA WtA . - NO °z Om ,þ.:;a tA "" ~ ...... "- .., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-¡O DATE: Oct. 28, 2003 REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [XXX] TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT) : HUMAN RESOURCES DEPARTMENT Carl Holeva Human Resources Director SUBJECT: Indian River Community College Training Program BACKGROUND: For the fiscal year 2003-2004, the Board of County Commissioners has again approved the Human Resources Department to enter into a partnership with Indian River community College (IRCC) to conduct training for all employees beginning Nov. 1, 2003. FUNDS AVAIL.:001-1330-534000-1901 PREVIOUS ACTION: The Board of County Commissioners approved funding for last year and due to the tremendous success, has approved funding for 2003-2004. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Board approve the contract with IRCC and authorize the Chairman to execute the contract. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [.~ [ ] APPROVED OTHER: [ ] DENIED n trator Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent Review and ADorovals Management . Budget Other: if applicable)___ Purchasing Other: county Attorney; Originating Dept. Finance: (Check for Copy only, Bft. 5/96 , '"'"' -..,J AGENDA TO: BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS FROM: Carl Holeva, Human Resources Director DATE: Oct. 28, 2003 SUBJECT: Indian River Community College (IRCC) Training Program for FY 2003-2004 contract BACKGROUND: Attached to this memorandum is a copy of the St. Lucie County Training Program for FY 2003-2004 contract with Indian River Community College (IRCC)which would provide training to County employees. . RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board of County Commissioners approve the contract with Indian River Community College (IRCC) and authorize the chairman to sign the contract. Respectfully submitted, ~~ Carl Holeva Human Resources Director CHimp Attachment 'wi ST. LUCIE COUNTY Training Program for FY 2004 . Submitted by: Gary Sullivan Indian River Community College Business & Professional Development Center " -..I Program Description: The training program consists of classes for managers, a class for secretarial personnel and workshops for all employees. Program Objectives: To improve performance of all employees. Delivery System: The training will be delivered according to the schedule approved by Human Resources. Cost: An in-state participant is a person who has maintained legal residence in Florida for a minimum of 12 months. An out-of-state participant is a person who has not maintained legal residence in Florida for at least 12 months). A minimum of 12 registrants/class is req uired. Cost per participant: In/state Out/of/state Management/Supervision classes: $78.00 $218.00 Office Administration 48.00 115.00 Workshops 20.50 N/A Occasionally an individual's registration cannot be processed due to afinancial obligation, e,g. IRCC parking ticket, library fee, or incomplete residency information. Every effort will be made to resolve the issue with the registrant in a timely manner, Regardless of registration status, the company will be billed for the total number of class participants, A participant whose registration cannot be processed will not receive a grade and this course will not appear on any of IRCC 's records. Commitment: St. Lucie County will commit to this training by signing and returning the enclosed proposal acceptance form by November 1, 2003. Please submit the attached proposal acceptance to: Indian River Community College Business Development Center 3209 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34981 772/462-4756 or Fax 772/462-4830 '-...I '" INDIAN RIVER COMMUNITY COLLEGE BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT CENTER 3209 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, Florida 34981 PROPOSAL ACCEPTANCE Company Name: St. Lucie County Administration Company Mailing 2300 Virginia Ave., Fort Pierce, FL. 34982 Address: Contact Person: Carl Holeva Phone: 561:462-1965 Fax: 561: 462-2361 Title of Training: FY 2004 Training Program Cost of Training: Cost per participant: Management/Supervision classes: Office Administration Workshops In/state $78.00 48.00 20.50 Out/of/state $218.00 115.00 N/A Dates and Time: The training will be delivered in accordance with the approved schedule of training. Location of Training: St. Lucie County Administration Building Accepted by: Date: Signature Printed Name St. Lucie County may terminate this agreement upon ten (10) days prior written notice. ~ '" ....J Agenda Request Item Number Date: c- 1/ October 28, 2003 Consent Regular Public Presentation Leg. [X] [ ] [ ] Quasi·JD [ To: Submitted By: Board of County Commissioners Community Development Director ent Director SUBJECT: BACKGROUND: Consider approval of the changes made to the Job Growth Investme Grant (JGIG). The Job Growth Investment Grant Program was approved in April of 1994 by the Board of County Commissioners in an effort to stimulate Job growth in 51. Luc e County. The grant program is structured to provide an incentive to businesses expanding in or relocating to 51. Lucie County based on certain criteria. Attached is a series of proposed amendments to the general rules and application/eligibility requirements for the program. The proposed amendments expand the target industry list; increase the average wage calculation; and eliminate the capital investment criteria. A summary of the proposed amendments is as follows: · The County is proposing to expand its targeted industry list to include industries simiiar to Enterprise Florida's list of industries. Staff believes by diversifying the list of businesses and industries it will bring many needed job opportunities to 51. Lucie County. · The wage calculation will now be calculated at 107% of the rate published by Enterprise Florida. Using this as a new standard rate. Using this as a new standard rate to a minimum average wage rate for participation in the program to $13.00. This wage rate would automatically adjust with each change to the rates published by Enterprise Florida. · The capital investment component that is proposed for deletion, is already an incentive included in the County's Ad Valorem Tax Abatement Program. This bonus criterion is not necessary as a part of the JGIG program since the effects of the capital investment are considered under the County's Ad Valorem Tax Abatement Program. By including it in the JGIG program, staff believes that we will be double dipping àny awards 'hat may be granted. FUNDS AVAILABLE: PREVIOUS ACTION: RECOMMENDATION: N/A N/A Staff recommends that the Board approve the proposed .amendments to the County's Job Growth Investment Grant Program as provided in the attached backup. COMMISSION ACTION: ~ APPROVED D DENIED D OTHER CONCURRENCE: Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent County Attorney Originating Dept.: Finance: ~/ Coordination! Signatures Mgt. & Budget: Other: Purchasing: Other: ""' ""'" Commission Review Date: October 28, 2003 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT Economic Development MEMORANDUM TO: Board of County Commissioners FROM: Community Development Director DATE: October 14, 2003 SUBJECT: Consider approval of the changes made to the Job Growth Investment Grant (JGIG). The Job Growth Investment Grant Program was approved in April of 1994 by the Board of County Commissioners in an effort to stimulate job growth in St. Lucie County. The grant program is structured to provide an incentive to businesses expanding in or relocating to St. Lucie County based on certain criteria. Attached is a series of proposed amendments to the general rules and application/eligibility requirements for the program. The proposed amendments expand the target industry list; increase the average wage calculation; and eliminate the capital investment criteria. A summary of the proposed amendments is as follows: · The County is proposing to expand its targeted industry list to include industries similar to Enterprise Florida's list of industries. Staff believes by diversifying the list of businesses and industries it will bring many needed job opportunities to St. Lucie County. · The wage calculation will now be calculated at 107% of the rate published by Enterpris!, Florida. Using this as a new standard rate. Using this as a new standard rate to a minimum average wage rate for participation in the program to $13.00. This wage rate would automatically adjust with each change to the rates published by Enterprise Florida. · The capital investme.nt component that is proposed for dele!ion, is already an incentive included in the County's Ad Valorem Tax Abatement Program. This bonus criterion is not necessary as a part of the JGIG program since the effects of the capital investment are considered under the County's Ad Valorem Tax Abatement Program. By including it in the JGIG program, staff believes that we will be double dipping any awards that may be granted. Staff recommends that the Board approve the proposed amendments to the County's Job Growth Investment Grant Program as provided in the attached backup. ""r ....; JGIG-03- ST. LUCIE COUNTY JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT GRANT AGREEMENT THIS AGREEMENT is made as of the _ day of , 2003 byªnd between St. Lucie County, a political subdivision of the State.of Florida, by andh!!~s Board of County Commissioners, hereinafter referred to as the COUNTY a corporation authorized to do business in the State of Florida, h after rel~ff~~¡¡I,i'as¡~e COMPANY, whose Federall.D. number is , h in St. Lucie County, ifa.ging the expansion of WHEREAS, it is the policy of the COUNTY to stimulate eco by either attracting new businesses to St. Lu~ or by existing businesses within St. Lucie Countyl,åhd WHEREAS, the creation of new employment op iibrtuniti esidents of St. Lucie County and the increased tax revenues res\ilI~~9 from~ch busirtê'ss expansion or relocation within St. Lucie County is beneficial to th~bal eco WHERE om missioners has determined that offering a Job Growth ¡¡inesses to expand or new businesses to enter St. Lucie ment opportunities for the residents of St. Lucie County; and WH~FŒAS, St. Lucie Q~un\y, through its Board of County Commissioners, h~s created a Job Grov..th Investment qrj[iht; and . . ... ..... ""'0'" 0.0 "·°0' "0..0 .·..·0..00 Wft.ÎiÎiBASi'!!',~'& COMPANY will either relocate to St. Lucie County or expand its existing business in St. Lucie County and thereby create certain new employment opportunities having a specific wage level or higher in St. Lucie County in accordance with the Job Growth Investment Grant criteria if the COUNTY provides to the COMPANY a Job Growth Investment Grant; and G :economiclJGIGlagreement (insert granVproject name) (insert print datel note draft # or final) final template approved 10/21/03 rev.10.21.03 Page 1 ~ ....,; WHEREAS, the COMPANY has been determined to be eligible to receive a Job Growth Investment Grant by the COUNTY's Job Growth Investment Grant Review Committee; and WHEREAS, the COMPANY acknowledges that this Agreement shall be based upon the COMPANY'S obtainment of the performance requirements as outlined in this Agreement; and, WHEREAS, the COUNTY finds and declares that it is in the publio;interest to award a Job Growth Investment Grant to COMPANY pursuant to the t~l1fus of thisyA;~eQ'lent. NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the premí~¡¡s and;Wn-lUtual covÈ!naiîtSihereinafter contained, the parties do agree as follows: ';"Yi''; , ,,¡ii;:;:;':;:·········::;:: 1. Definitions. As used in this Agreement, the fQllo"";in'gterrns sl:¡ç¡.I1 mean: a. "Annual Average Hourly Wage" and commissions but does 1'1 defined in this Agreement ¡;jy "Base Period for Hourlyy~age le~rand Report (UCT-6) as,¡\#!Ρihed iniy~hibit " application., ' s the tiijj¡I.I~¡Yii~St of wages, bonuses, fits. Thêif;fop Executive salaries as in tÞe average wage_calculatlons..__ - ------------ b. ãtion" - the Employer's Quarterly or the quarter preceding the Grant c. "Default" -f ¡¡¡¡ffiêrms of the Agreement. to start the annual monitoring of the Job of an busilìess" - A business establishing 1 Q er more jobs to mor w full-time employees in the County. These jobs must crease in employment at the site/facility and be not less than a e. quivalent Job" - shall be calculated by total payroll' liours per year 52 weeks and then, divided by 35 hours. '-shall mean Job Growth Investment Grant. "New Business" - a business establishing 10 or more jobs to employ 10 or more full-time employees in the County within the term of the Grant provided that such business first begins operations on a site in the County clearly separate from any other operation owned by the same business. i. "Employer's Quarterly Report Form UCT-6" - is defined in Exhibit "A". G:economiclJGI G/agreement (insert granVproiect name) (insert print datel note draft # or final) finaltemplate approved 10/21/03 rev.1 0.21 .03 Page 2 '"" ..",,¡ j. "St. Lucie County Average Hourly Wage" - The average annual hourly wage per job in St. Lucie County, as determined by State of Florida Department of Labor, Workforce Development Soard or Enterprise Florida, Inc., times 107%. 2. Waqe Level Commitment. As a condition precedent to and as consideration for obtaining JGIG funds from the COUNTY, the COMPANY agrees to pay an average hourly wage of not less than $_ per hour annually for those new jobs which are eligible for Grant hereunder. This per hour wage will be adjusted on the third and six anniversary of the. Effective Date of this Agreement for wage rate inflation based upon th~Øifferencein the wage rates from the EnterpriseFlorida average wage rate for St. Lucj~County onthe~ateof the Agreement and the Enterprise Florida average wage rate ;·tf'lree years and then six years from the Effective Date of the Agreement. The difference between the average wage ratEl$.~I!ITÞe added to the target wage rate in the Agreement. The COMPANY shall providè"'j\'lritteniverification satisfactory to the COUNTY that the average hourly wage oft~è new jAbs meets the average rate of $- per hour in the first three years of the·Agreement.and·adjusted as defined above in year three and year six. The first report provided by the e the$tate of Florida Employer's per month, total number of hours and wages for the Top G Application Date. These Top ) highest paid employees on a wage d wage dollars for these Top Two (2) rter after the approval of the JGIG the the COUNTY when filing the Employer's COMPANY'~~l~f~ to maintain its hourly wage level commitment for any year will result in the forf~fure'of the Grant amount for that year. Such forfeiture will-Rot preclude the COMPANY'sreceipt of scheduled Grant amounts for subsequent years in which it is able to maintain its hourly wage level commitment 3. \Job CreatÎøh Commitment. y!,::ui'.:·····{i::;F'<'·'···,,· 'W'Â.sa condition precedent to, and as consideration for obtaining JGIG funds from the COUNTY, the COMPANY agrees to create a minimum of _ new Full-Time Equivalent Jobs in St. Lucie County over the term of this Agreement as more specifically set forth on Exhibit "S", which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. These new jobs will be phased in on the following schedule; G:economic/JGI G/agreement (insert granVproject name) (insert print datel note draft # or finai) final template approved 10/21/03 rev. 1 0.21.03 Page 3 '-' ...I Year One after Effective Date Year Two after Effective Date Year Three after the Effective Date Year Four after the Effective Date _% or a minimum of _jobs _0/0 or a minimum of _ jobs _ % or a minimum of _ jobs _ % or a minimum of _ jobs To obtain the Grant amount for jobs created, the annual calculation of jobs created must meet or exceed the minimum job levels and meet the hourly wage requirements. The annual calculation of the incremental jobs will be determined by taking the Base Period quarterly reported hours and dividing by 455 (35 hoursx:,52 weeks x .25 of year) to arrive at a full time employee count. The same calculation for4he current year shall be made by taking the reported annual hours divi(i l9øH:iy 1820 (~5hours x 52 weeks) to arrive at a full time employee count. TheB~se Periodeniployee¡¡;ount sh,aU be subtracted from the current employee count;;then comparing to the>minimÚI!il jobs committed by the COMPANY to create. The COMPANY's failure to maintain its job cr result in the forfeiture of the entire Grant am year. Such forfeiture will not preclude the amounts for subsequent years in whi commitment. The COMPANY'S failure", maintain its job creation commitml9ml' established payment schedule. mitment for anyone year will sCheduled to receive for that rê¡¡;¡¡¡ipt of sCheduled Grant is able··,to"fu'îl!mtain its job creation funds inamy'year it fails to meet or . e grounds for an extension of the 4. Term: Termination. 5. This Agreement shall b¡¡¡i'cBffective parties hereto, and êha,lisautomat unless terminatedea~lieî'1¡by the "):!'!'. /·X":<"·~"'':'· ho~\ler, provisiØÉ!š\'jfI'f:¡\J¡¡ls contra n the d¡íte of execution of this contract by both te .iI'1ãte _ years after the Effective Date se of a default by the COMPANY provided urvive the termination of the contract. a. termil'la.tjØn; Payment. The initial eligibility determination for JGIGshall be made on the first anniversary of the Effective Date . Subsequent eligibility determinations shall be made at each ersary of the Effective Date of this Agreement. Payme f JGIG Funds shall be made as follows: All Grants with an Effective Date een October 1" and March 31st will be paid by May 15'h after the su sful completion and submission of the required documentation each year. AI rants with an Effective Date between April 1 " and September 30th will be paid by November 15th after the successful completion and submission of the required documentation each year. Notwithstanding the foregoing, should the date for filing the last annual Employer's Quarterly Report (Form UCT-6), as described in Exhibit "A", not coincide with the date that an eligibility determination is made; the COMPANY shall have the right to file a report, in a form substantially similar to an G:economicJJGIG/ag reement (insert granVproject name) (insert print datel note draft # or final) final template approved 10/21/03 rev.10.21.03 Page 4 '" -' Employer's Quarterly Report in a form acceptable to the COUNTY for payment. b. The COMPANY will be eligible for a Job Growth Investment Grant (hereinafter a "Grant") of an amount up to $ which Grant shall be payable as follows: Year Year ---I -- This payout period, _ years, will begin one year after the effective date based on payout schedule in paragr.:\ph 5 section a. The_ COUNTY shall pay $_ per Full-Time Equiyalent Job. 6. Relocation Commitment. As a condition precedent to, and as consid~[ation for obtaining J§IG funds from COUNTY, the COMPANY agrees to locate or"e~¡¡.nd its business operations to/within St. Lucie County for a period of at least _y,~rs'¡ftt>a suitable site as described on Exhibit "C", which is attached hereto and made¡,áipàrthereof. 7. Annual Job Status. The',: GI provided relocation limité¡¡¡toc improvements, ;,;facilities, lease .,2; Growth Investm Employer's Quarterly Report UCT-6 he Ståte form UCT-6 as amended. !'!!Ie time it provides the State of 8. GråÌl\1WRestrictio nds ava r this Agreement as referenced in paragraph 5 will be r reim of expenses associated with the physical move, ansiõn<LÕ the COMPANY to St. Lucie County including but not COMPANY relocation expenses, infrastructure costs, leasehold NY sponsored child day care facilitie¡s, rent for CQMPANY , training expenses and other expenses approved by the Job ant Committee. 9. Default; Termitilàtion. ',Int~~;éîfèht the COMPANY defaults in the performance of its guarantees and 'i;c;omrltlitments as provided for in this Agreement, the COUNTY may, at its option, terminate this Agreement. 10. Indemnification. For the sum of ten ($10.00) dollars consideration, receipt of which is hereby acknowledged, the COMPANY shall indemnify and save harmless and defend the G:economiclJGi G/agreement (insert granVproject name) (insert print datel note draft # or final) final template approved 10/21/03 rev. 1 0.21.03 Page 5 '-' ....J COUNTY, its servants, and employees from and against any and all claims, liabilities, losses, and/or cause of action which may arise from any negligent act or omission of the COMPANY, its agents, servants, or employees in the performance of services under this Agreement. 11. Forum: Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of Florida. Any and all legal action necessary to enforce the Agreement will be held in St. Lucie County or the Federal District Court for the Southern District of Florida. NO~ßmedy herein conferred upon any party is intended to be exclusive of anw~ther remed~¡ and each and every such remedy shall be cumulative and shall be ißg,lIddition to ,other remedy given hereunder or now or hereafter existing by law o~ii h equity orby , . ute ()r ()therwise. No single or partial exercise by any party of an' ht, pO\lller, or rerí1edy.l'\ì;irßunder shall preclude any other or further exercise thereof., 12. Lobbyist Certification. The COMPANY warrants that it has not emplj!jyed G.:;any company or person, other than a bona fide employee working,s for th . NY to solicit or secure this Agreement and that it has notA4J!~lâ reed tô"". ny person, company, corporation, individual, or firm, oth¡;¡~~liíãn e employee working solely for the COMPANY, any fee, commissjôT1, percør any other consideration contingent upon or resulting from'the award or his Agreement. 13. No Discrimination Certificatíørt The COMPANY warranlstand re durir1~employme~I,iMtitt1()ut regar origjnjiancestry"f'mllritahstatus, or' Ih~têall of its employees are treated equally ;"'color, religion, disability, sex, age, national [ôrientation. 14. Attorrrevs~':Fees. If any}~g~¡':acl or b.eeåuse ot with any p rovis entitled to re taxes) even if n and expenses any other relie ( other'prødeeding is brought for the enforcement of this Agreement, Ie ed dispute, breach, default or misrepresentation in connection Agreement, the successful or prevailing party or parties shall sonable attorney's fees, court costs and all expenses (including ble as court costs (including, without limitation, all $ut:h fees, costs ident to appeals), incurred in that action or proceeding, in addition to o which such party or parties may be entitled. 15. Enforceabllitv. any term or provision of this Agreement, or the application thereof to any person or circumstances shall, to any extent, be held invalid or unenforceable, the remainder of this Agreement, or the application of such terms or provision, to persons or circumstances other than those to which it is held invalid or unenforceable, shall not be affected, and every other term and provision of this Agreement shall be deemed valid and enforceable to the extent permitted by law. The COMPANY'S failure to maintain its job creation commitment or salary level commitment for anyone year will result in the G :economiclJG IG/agreement (insert granVproject name) (insert print datel note draft # or linal) final template approved 10/21/03 rev.10.21.03 Page 6 '- ...I forfeiture of the Grant amount it was scheduled to receive for that year; however, such forfeiture will not preclude the COMPANY'S receipt of scheduled Grant amounts for those subsequent years in which it is able to maintain its job creation and salary level commitment. 16. Assiqnment. The COMPANY shall not assign this Agreement to any other persons or firm without first obtaining COUNTY'S written approval. 17. Conflict of Interest. The COMPANY represents that it presently has, no interest and small a<;l. uire no interest, either direct or indirect, which would conflictdl'1 any manner witmt mance of services required herein, as provided for in ,~ctio~EH112.311. Flori . . tes. The COMPANY further represents that no person l'!j¡.ving;''!Iny interest shall b ployed for said performance. 18. Notices. All notices required in this AgreemenlF~haUHge sent by oertified mail, return receipt requested and if sent to the COUNTM;1sli1ållb.É!f·l' ! aile¡j to: Witf1.çd~~;~b: 19. St. Lucie County Adminis 2300 Virginia Avenue Fort Pierce, FL 34982 St. I"Wöie County Attorney 2~~,Ø'Virginia Avenue ~rt Pierce, FL 34982 With copy to: x xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xXXXXXXXXXXXXXxx xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx xxx The COUNTY ~,d't:fhe COMPANY agree that this Agreement sets forth the entire Agreement betw;een the parties, and that there are no promises or understandings other than those sta.têd herein. None of the provisions, terms and conditions contained in this Agreemenl,,~ay be added to, modified, superseded,or otherwise altered"ßXcept by '\lVritteniliΡjlfument executed by the parties hereto. IN Wii! 1j\ ËSS WHEREOF, the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County, Florida, has made and executed this Agreement on behalf of the COUNTY and COMPANY has hereunto sets its hand the day and year above written. G :economic/JG IG/agreement (insert granVproject name) (insert print date! note draft # or final) final template approved 10/21/03 rev.10.21.03 Page 7 '- ATTEST: Deputy Clerk WITNESSES: (Corporate Seal) G :economic/JGIG/agreement (insert grant/project name) (insert print datel note draft # or final) final template approved 10/21/03 rev.10.21.03 ..., BOARD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA BY: CHAIRMAN APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: C~nty Attorney Date Page 8 '- -' Exhibit A To the Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement between 51. Lucie County and (Company) Attach a copy of UCT -Q Formd1¡;,.. Must include total hours for the ~~sswages ph¡¡~. the hours and gross wages for th~top two executivs& G:economic/JGI G/agreement (insert grant/project name) (insert print date! note draft /I or final) final template approved 10/21/03 rev.10.21.03 Page 9 '- U$ØblackK*. Exampl9A·Handwrl;ten Exan1II8B· Florida Deparbnent of Revenue ~er's Quarterty Report Employers are required to liIe quarterly IaJ</Wage reports regardless ot emplDymenl activity or wI1eIher any taxes are due, UCT-8 R.03l03 @[i]~@]I'!J[5JŒC!J~1!I DIlì~m[]D aUARTER ENDING DUE DATE DD/DD/DDDD I PENALTY AFTER DATE TAX RATE II II UT ACCOUNT NUMBER I DDDDDDD-D 1111111 11111111 Name Address City/St/ZI T 1. Errterthe total number of full-time and part-tirœ 00Y8f8d workers who performed servlcesdllnng or received pay for tltEt payroU period iooludirtg the 12ttl ~tbII month. 2. Gross Wages Paid This Quarter (Mustbll samø as item 13) 3. Wages Paid This QuartS( in Excess ot $7,000 Per Employee This Year 4. Taxable Wages For This Quarter (Item 2 minus item 3) 5. Tax Due (Mulliplyitem 4 by Tax Rate) 6.P&RaIlyDue (See instructions) 7. JntBfestDue (SeeiRStructions) 8. Total Amount Due Make check payable to: Rorida U.C. Fund (If less than tI.OO RO remillanœ is necesary) 'stM,,"h ODD DDD , 2OOM,nth ODD DDD , '''Mooth ODD DDD , DølffllmaaMf ,.,."18,,. f.E.!. NUMBER =::,,:,,:' DDDDDDDDD 11'1 HtdH, campletl tH _. FOR OfFICIAL USE ONLV pOSTMARK DATE :=-,.:- DO/DD/DDDD (UCS4}. , I US Dalla.. I I c.m I DDD,DDD,DDD. DD DDD,DDD,DDD.DD DDD,DDD,DDD. DD DDD,DDD,DDD. DD DDD,DDD,DDD.DD DDD,DDD,DDD.DD DDD,DDD,DDD.DD r certify It}e ¡nlormation cORtained on this report is true and correct and no part of the unemployment tax was, or is to be deducted trom the employee's wages. Date Paid pre parers only Preparer's signature Date Firm's name (or yours i setf-ßmployedJ and address 9. EMPLOYEE'S SOCIAL SECURITY NUMBER I'D. EMflOVEE'S NAME" ~please print first eleven charadBrs of last name in bœcøs I J I", EMPLOYEE'S GROSS WAGES PAID ]HIS QUARTER First Middle ~ last Name Initial Initial I US Dollal'1il f f Cents f DDD-DD-DDDD DDDDDDDDDDD D D DDD,ŒJD,DDD.DD DDD-DD-DDDD DDDDDDDDDDD D D DDD,DDD,DDD.DD DDD-DO-DDDD DDDDDDDDDDD D D DDD,DDD,DOD.DD ODD-DD-ODDD DDDDDDDDDDD D D DDD,DDD,DOD.DD DDD-DD-DDDD DDDDDDDDDDD D D DDD,DDD,DDD.DD DDD-DD-DDDD DDDDDDDDDDD D D DDD,DDD,DDD.DD :ft=~:P:~~. 12. Total Gross Wages This Page DDD,DDD,DDD. DD ".rolaIGrossW......p.... .J DDD DDD DDD DO (Mustbessmeas"m2-GrossWag..¡ ". L '- '-' Exhibit 8 To the Job Growth Investment Grant Agreement between 51. Lucie County and (Company) I. Tarqet: Industry Category eligible for application. Qualified companies\lliill<fall in oither tho , Industrv List attached - circle the qualified indumrv. 1'.'.'Íation/Enginooring Bblsinos&f.Financial Sorvises Companieff~hat bltili~e!! reen t~~;l!iFIele!! ies NationalS)' ;¡e!! ion¡ì.I'(')er 3er¡¡t~0¡"¡oadE blar-t9rs ·"wn",~ II. Alication SeCliÖI1t¡miteria: Expal'Ís New!6usiness RelQ'bation of net new jobs (number)_ of net new jobs (number) of net new jobs (number) III; ·¡¡E"1pl?M,ment Commitment: CØMPANY is receiving this grant based upon its representation that it will bring the following employment opportunities to St. Lucie County: Total number of employees (new and existing) expected during term of grant New, full time employees (eligible for grant application) expected during term of grant G:economiclJG IG/agreement (insert granVproject name) (insert print datel note draft # or final) final template approved 10/21/03 rev.10.21.03 Page 10 \w .,.¡ % of County residents Average hourly wage of all employees to be employed by company Current average hourly wage in 51. Lucie County Capital Investment Amount (Building improvements, equ[ !Iment etc). IV. Grant Amount: Grant award calculation not to exceed $1 '::,,;>''''/ ',-:-,,:,,<> T<'Ita]>Bonuses i ;'íOtal Grant (base amount + total bonuses) Local contractors are those contractors who are licensed in 51. Lucie County and have an office locate ,in 51. Lucie County. Bonus computations: . ** Base Grant Amount $1,000 X grant More than 100 total ne 26 - 50 total new jobs (10% 51-100 total new jobs (20% 90% or more iocalhires - ,$1. L1.iêiª~~Ø;~~!y Residents (5% bonus) Average salaryfor appli9ªht's job~ì!lHl1Ÿè 125% of 51. Lucie County average sa,I!:!W, (15% us) Average >F"ty for a cant's j '$ will be 150% of 51. Lucie County average ary (30· u '. ** 0 " ** 0 "~~F~.of 10è~f¡~Þntractors for construction activity' (5% bonus) G :economic/JGI G/agreement (insert granVproject name) (insert print datel note draft # or final) final template approved 10/21/03 rev. 1 0.21.03 Page 11 '- ...,; Exhibit B -Attachment 1 Tarqet Industry List MANUFACTURING FACILITIES Chemical Manufacturina Pharmaceutical Manufacturina Plastics & Rubber Products Mfa. Comouter & Electronic Product Mfa. Comouter & Electronic Comoonent Mfa Electromedical Aooaratus Mfa. Laser Manufacturina Semiconductor Manufacturina Software Reoroducina Transoortation Eauioment Manufacturina Aviation & Aerosoace Manufacturina Machinerv Manufacturina Instruments for Measurina & Testina Elec. Lens Manufacturina Power Dlstrib.. Generation & Technoloav Electrical Eauioment Manufacturina Aooliance Comoonent Manufacturina Fiber Ootic Cable Manufacturina Miscellaneous Manufacturina Sur ical M ical Instr m n Mf Food & Bevera e Prod ts Manuf Textile Mills & Aooarel ManufactJlIii.' Wood & Paoer Product Manufactunrra Printina & Related Suooort A<;t¡i\l!itìes Metal ManufacturinQ' ' Furnit re & R late P "':5 Mf . A ua ul PROFESSIONAL. SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL SERVICES Professional. Scienti~¢>& Technical Comouter Proaran'lmina/Software Co mou~erS'ílstem .Desi a n 41i1¡;lnaaement.:S<;;lentific & Tech Services Research &gevelooment Scientific & TechnicaLConsultinaSvc Simulationæ~ªinina Testina L¡,I~o~at!!,ries Bio-Medical & BICI'iS-ei,ence N I Head trs Distribution Centers ,RATlVE & SUPPORT SERVICES Customer Care Centers >:Ænbound Teleohonic & On-line Business Svs ,.,. (no outbound services) Customer Suooort Transaction Processina Technical Suooort Credit Bureaus Funds Other industries may be considered bY the Board of County Commissioners if the comoanv can imoroye the Quality of life within the community by creatina new jobs and/or hjah waoe lobs. INFORMATION IES Sound Recordi~:lr~j I!!;tries Film. Video/Electronic':l'IIedia Production Information Servicei!& Data Processina Internet Svc Proviqê'l'S. Web Search Portals Data Pro~~ssinaServices . Publjsl'lfi\a Industries SOftware Publishina Music Publishina Telecommunications Satellite Communications G :economicJJGIG/agraement (insert granUproject name) (insert print datel note draft # or final) final template approved 10/21/03 rev.10.21.03 Page 12 '- Exhibit C To the Job Growth Inves Agreement between St. L (Company Company Identification and Information Application Code Number Effective Date Company Description Board Approval Date Local mailing address of company/ location of new business ..." nt Gt1.antt . ounty ., ",;;"., :;;;;1',- G:economiclJGIGJagreement (insert granVproject name) (insert print datel note draft # or final) final template approved 10/14/03 rev.10.14.03 Page 13 '" -.I ST. LUCIE COUNTY JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT GRANT (JGIG) PROGRAM PROCESS General: 1. Board of County Commissioners adopted JGIG'HProgralfj, 'g'i:JÎpeJines in 1994 through Resolution 94-168, subsequently amended in 19~8',~l'Iti 2003:' 2. Board of County Commissioners provides fun(jing for JG ~ Progra~';~$,pari oftl'1e annual County operating budget. The exact amount tø!be funpeð varies by yeàþ;ÖIiIt.generally does not exceed $500,000 per annum 3. Board of County Commissioners establishedlÄi'ò Job Growth Investment Grant Review Comm1ttee three (3) members whose composition inc!l,!, . One (1) Economic Development . Two (2) from the County, aPPQI lution 94-168, as amended, a ommittee) comprised of siJ¡ .. . There shall be a program adn:ílnistrator"fbr the J ! shall be charged with th~~\terall /l3'sponsibili Investment Grant progral')'í~'H' . , 5. The program admi1iT~r~()r shall b.ê,thê~~~munity Development Director or his designee. wth Investment Grant program who for the over site of the Job Growth 4. 1. The 5t. DivisiQn application fó ,unty DêIi! ¡¡iI1:ment of Community Development, Economic Development cQllaterálQ¡J!T¡aterial promoting JGIG Program and provides all required Applioati~~ltiPro 2. t written project details to the 5t. Lucie County Department of opment, Economic Development Division identifying the anticipated ires during the term of the grant, jsla ogessFi 3tions with starting salarios avera e sta . '., wa e rate, benefits packages, training programs and ca~al investment. '¡,",';l~ny graQ,t,¡¡¡t¡J1'êement shall be performance based. 3.,i!"iI'fjJiootiOns are to be submitted to the Program Administrator for verification, presentation anti recommendation to the Job Growth Investment Grant ReviewCornmittee. 4. The Program Administrator shall inform the applicant, by letter, of the Review Committee's recommendation and the date, time, and place the Board of County Commissioners will consider the application for Job Growth Investment Grant. 5. JGIG grant agreements shall be presented to the Board of County Commissioners for approval and execution (Consent Agenda when standard contract is adhered to and Regular Agenda when standard contract is not used, indicating the effective date of contract G :economiclJG I G/agreement (insert grant/project name) (insert print datel note draft # or final) final template approved 10/14/03 rev. 1 0.14.03 Page 14 '- ""'" if not the Board of County Commissioners approval date of grant agreement). 6. Once awarded a JGIG grant, the applicant shall provide the Program Administrator documentation of performance, as required by Agreement. The Program Administrator will verify the documentation, and makes a determination of compliance with grant agreemenVJGIG. 7. The County's Management and Budget Director shall, up Community Development Director, approve invo' 'lend s Clerk of Board of County Commissioners (Fina . epartm recommendation of the ,.I~ payment requ.est to iialJíciit·and payment. 8. If there is any dispute over the documenta Review Committee for recommendation. T issues to Board of County Commissioners for r spute shalliililel'~µbrl11ltted to the Committee shi:íUii,refer unresolved final action. 9. The Program Administrator will monitor the g¡;åntee requirements of the JGIG grant award. o verify compliance with the 10. The grantee will supply quarterly th Administrator as required by the.ª for the Program Administrator"iWfo commitments were achieved, l~ ';y'':>i arterIY;fiÍ~port (UCT-6) to the Program Jr'tIocumentation as necessary Ie 'e job creation and salary level ..... . 11. The Program Administr~t~.~·'w1ll mo~jfor the g.rähtee annually to determine the economic impact of its relocations~r.¡expansior.ls. G :economic/JG IG/agreement (insert granVproject name) (insert print datel note dralt # or final) final template approved 10/14/03 rev.10.14.03 Page 15 '- ...." JOB GROWTH INVESTMENT GRANT (JGIG) PROGRAM CRITERIA I. Administration: 1. Job Growth Investment Grant ("JGIG") monies witkbe manågedand disbursed by the St. Lucie County Board of County Commissioners ("B~¡iI!'d"). 2. The St. Lucie County Department of Comm,~!'iÎty Develóprnent,li:oonQÍ1r1ic Development Division will be the executive agent for accepµtr appr tions for JGIG· wards. The St. Lucie County Department of Community , nt, Economic De, 'h,ent Division will review each application received for co Once certified as complete, the application will be forwarded to the Review Committee for review and recommendation to the Job Growth Investrn\;mt .Røview Committee. 3. The Review Committee must evaluate aq<;!,¡j within fourteen (14) days of the Prqg~ ' ' Committee, and schedule each a!'!Þrov available meeting of the Board oÐCount days from the Review COmrí!'littee's r.ff60mm consideration may be e uPo":nrequest Community Developme conom!è Devel Commissioners, or Pro Adminl~tator.·Y. propriate,:~ehí¡!èr a preliminary evaluation trator'sl\wrommendation to the Review fo@f¡¡'al consideration at the next ,but not more than fourteen (14) The time criterion for Board the St. Lucie County Department of ent Division, the Board of County 4. s for the:j~.~~:j!iil:rbwth Investment Fund Program are limited, the ioners mì!ty prioritize, approve, disapprove andlor modify grant uthorized bonuses) for the program at its sole discretion. 1 . . ansion within St. Lucie County or relocation to the County that or more of the following targeted industry categories shall be Ie for the receipt of a JGIG grant award: II. A ,......_",y ;¡;:i;;;iLi» · .'\'iªtion/~ngineering, · /).Srisulturel.^.quasulturo Feed presessin¡¡, ·~~sinoss Finansial Sorvises, ¡¡.." COR'lputem and Elestr-oniss Industrios, · BieteshlMeeiGal/Pt:larR'lClseutiGallnaustries, · Marino Manufasluring Inaustries, · ~Jational or Re¡¡ienal Cerporate ÞleaaE1uar:ters, · SpertslRosreation Manufasturin¡¡ Industry, · RoseaFGh 8. DevolepR'lent relatod Inaustries, · Re¡¡ionalllnternatienal Preaust Distri ;¡utien Centers · Industries tt:lat utilize "¡¡reen" TÐst:lnole¡¡ies · Othor industries may ;¡o sensiderea ;¡y t!:le Beara ef County ComR'lissieners if tne GOR'l 3any san impreve tne E1uality ef lifo witt:lin tne semmunity ;¡y sreatin¡¡ now JODs and/er Rig!:l wage je ;¡s. G :economic/JG IG/agreement (insert granVproject name) (insert print datel note draft # or final) final tempiate approved 10/14/03 rev. 1 0.14.03 Page 16 '- ....", Tarqet Industry List MANUFACTURING FACILITIES Chemical Manufacturina Pharmaceutical Manufacturina Plastics & Rubber Products Mfa. ComDuter & Electronic Product Mfa. ComDuter & Electronic ComDonent Mfa Electromedical ADDaratus Mfa. Laser Manufacturina ' Semiconductor Manufacturina Software ReDroducina TransDortation EouiDment Manufacturina Aviation & AerosDace Manufacturino Machinerv Manufacturino Instruments for Measurino & Testina Elec. Lens Manufacturina Power Distrib.. Generation & Technoloov Electrical EouiDment Manufacturino ADDliance ComDonent Manufacturino Fiber ODtic Cable Manufacturino Miscellaneous Manufacturinoii Suroical & Medical Instrument Mfiíf" Food & Bevera e Produ M n f '~" Textile Mills & A arel Manufa Wood & Pa er Product Man Printin & Related u Metal Man fa Furni re & Relat A uac PROFESSIONAL. SCIENTIFIC & TECHNICAL SERVICES Professional. Scientific & Technical ComDuter Proarammino/Software ComDuter System Desion Manaoement,Scientific & Tech Services Reseårch& DeveloDment Scientific & Tecl:inicallii :;onsultinaSvc ~. " "",., Simulation f~'Î1il'l( Testino Labo_rifés Bio~Medical & Bio-'5cience GEMENT & DI T 18 TI N Manaoement Services Nation'al. International & Reoional Headotrs Distribution Centers National. International & Reoional Distribution Centers INISTRATlVE & SUPPORT SERVICES Customer Care Centers Inbound Tele honic & On-line Business Svs (no outbound services) Customer SUDDort Transaction Processina Technical SUDDOrt Credit Bureaus ¡I'NFORMATlO RIES ,,' Sound Recordi~bflrâustries Film, Video/Electronit:Media Production Information Services & Data Processina Internet Svc Providers. Web Search Portals DataP(,ocessino Services -Rûblishino Industries '¡Software Publishino Music Publishino Telecommunications Satellite Communications Other industries may be considered bv the Board of County Commissioners if the company can improve the euality of life within the community bv creatine new iobs and/or hieh waee iobs. G:economicfJG IG/agreement (Insert grant/project name) (insert print datel note draft # or final) final template approved 10/14/03 rev.10.14.03 Page 1ì '- ,..." 2. Expansion/relocation that will create ten or more new jobs, paying (an average of) at least 1 OgZ% of SI. Lucie County's Private Sector average salary/wage level.. A lower average wage may be accepted by the Board of County Commissioners if theiiÍrnpact is off-set by the number of new jobs created or by a large capital investment into the community or the industry addresses a special need of the community. 3. The total direct economic impact of the proje9tit0the Countyjl'lc ~~iIi\1¡lthe number, type, and quality of the jobs, including benefits.,~ffered,-ca¡i)itålinV$st~~?t which will be produced in the County during the constructiol\1ipf the project and tners!:ìftet, III. Grant Limits: 1. The maximum for grant award is $2,000 pet neW.. ob created; larger per job awards, subject to Board approval, are possible for those oornpanies meeting additional Bonus Criteria. 2. The maximum grant award is ~if7Gcro,oo flexibility to increase the cap!~16r outstån Program Administrator and th~the Re'olièw Co no case should a JGIG eXC¡e,e!il$1 ,00Q iÖbO. anV applicable bonuses, with the ts upon recommendation of the and approval by the Board, but in 3. Unless otherwise deterrrliiit'ed by t Grant aw ard, t~l9rant award shall be phased in as follows: I to or lê's~an$50,000. ··(a) (b) . 50% of grant) 50% of grant) e than $50,000 (a) :~lltnàn 20% of the total grant award per annum All granLa.wards shall be distributed within 45 days of March 31 or September 30 year fOlll¡)Wing the first annualteport that certifies compliance outlined in the job creatiQrf requirements of the JGIG Grant award. BOJ1ijsès may not allow a company to exceed the maximum award cap of without Board of 'Coilinty Commissioners approval. The grant award amount will be calculated at a base rate of $1000 per job award amount plus bonuses, if applicable. Established bonus criteria as follows (except as provided in section III, paragraph 2): (a) A 5% bonus may be awarded if at least 90% of jobs are filled by residents of the County who have resided in the County at least one (1) year prior to the application. (b) JOBS CREATED 10 -25 PERCENT OF BONUS 0% G :economic/JG IG/agreement (insert granVproject name) (insert print datel note draft # or final) final template approved 10/14/03 rev.10.14.03 Page 18 '-' ...,; 26 - 50 51 -100 100 + +10% +20% +30% These new jobs will be phased in on the following schedule; Year One after Effective Date Year Two after Effective Date . Year Three after the Effective D¡¡,tî!J Year Four after the Effective Da:~i;. .....-% or a minimum of _ jobs _ % or a.minimurm·~f _ jobs _ % 9~iiéÌ'tninimu.. ' iobs _ %,,(!¡r a minimu " ;...;.,. iobs To obtain the Grant amount for jobs create meet or exceed the minimum job levels and hnual calculation ofJbbs created must a.,'f;J,qurly wage requirements. :;'~Ii!~rcent of Bonus 'liiîJJ% ' ·';~15% +30% (c) Annual Averaae Salarv 100% SLC avg. salary 125% SLC avg. salary 150% SLC avg. salary This wage rate,wiII be a~JtJstedl!;:~hethird and sixth anniversary of the Effective Da pf eachl><greemerì;ffor wage rate inflation based upon the difference' . wagel'åtes fron;¡iiEnterprise Florida's average wage rate on the date e Agreement ang.i'\I!Ie wage rate from Enterprise Florida's wage rate nd siXii~e¡;¡~~4~~1f\ the Effective Date of the Agreement. The di etweeni;ithe.ª~eliåge wage rates will be added to the target wage r reemeht. o o o onus for use of local contractors· in St. Lucie County: 5% ·Local Contractors are those contractors who are licensed St. Lucie County and have an office located in St. Lucie County. G:economic/JGIG/ag reement (insert granVproject name) (insert print datel note draft # or final) final template approved 10/14/03 rev. 1 0.14.03 Page 19 Fort Capron Marker ~ 'ž fpfit.'! ~ , , ç , \ ~ \ - ---..\ \ \ , \ \ ~ " ~ ~, --~-- ~~. ~ '~ .. ~ , ~, \ \ \ ( Exhibit 0 St Lucie Village School House Heritage Trail Property Owners Access Points Legend Project site ---, I>- Access via Old Dixìe Highway St, Lucie Village owned A 1428-&)1-ûOJ5-0009 Sandra Kapti$ 0.17 ac B, 142&-501··{)ÜIQ.-OOO8 Gertrude CaJhoun 0.06 ac. e. 1428-50-1-0012-0002 !,\,1axin(l Dawes 0.22 ac 0, FEC ROW 0_61 ac. (Acquire a 12 ft conservation easement for the mulÜ-use traB) E 1433-:110-0029-0103 , FEC RR 0.1 ac F, 0& 1433-110-0031-0007 S. Gooch & G. COf1CB.f1non 1.37ac G. 1433-113-003CHJ102 P. Hansen & M. Vemese 1.43 ac. ~?7 :5) 34 I , Scale, 1" = 450' Map prepared June 2, 2003 INDIAN 1~!VfR N " ~ ø í ~'- "0, ._m,n~_\ \ "~ \ \ \ .~\ \ \"4!--'r~---\ I I " t' I ~, ':~ ß~'--- _____'m. \~ \t> l »9-"-. " , \, ., ,¡¡>-", ~'%- v I" ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT ...." BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS JOHN D, BRUHN DOUG COWARD PAULA A LEWIS FRANNIE HUTCHINSON DISTRICT 1 DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 4 CLIFF BARNES DISTRICT 5 AGENDA October 28, 2003 1. MINUTES "1- Approve th,e minutes of the meeting held August 26, 2003. Approve the minutes of the Tentative Budget Meeting held September 11, 2003. Approve the minutes of Jhe Final Budget Meeting held September I8, 2003 \ 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT . ". -" CONSENT AGENDA 1. WARRANTS LISTS - Approve Warrants List No. 48, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55 and 56. Approve Warrants List No.2 through 5 2. PUBLIC WORKS I ENGINEERING Artificial Reef Program - Consider staff recommendation to approve Work Authorization No.2 (C-00-I2-173) with Coastal Planning an Engineering, Inc. in the amount of $19,238 and authorize the Chairman to sign the work authorization. 3. COUNTY A ITORNEY Propo.sed Local Bill / Codification of St. Lucie County Erosion District Special Acts _ Consider staff recommendation to grant permission to present the proposed local bill to the Legislative Delegation during its meeting on December 3, 2003. NOTICE: All proceedings before this Board are electronically recorded. Any person who deddes to appeal any action taken by the Board at these meetings will need a record of the proceedings and for such purpose may need to ensure that a verbatim record of the proceedings is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any party to the proceedings will be granted an opportunity to cross-examine any individual testifying during a hearing upon request. Anyone with a disability requiring accommodation to attend this meeting should contact the St. Lucie County CommunIty Services Manager at (561) 462.1777 or fiD (561) 462- 1428 at least forty-eight(48) hours prior to the meeting. """ ..., EROSION DISTRICT ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: August 26, 2003 Tape: I Convened: 10:22 a.m.. Adjourned: IO:23 a.m. . Commissioners Present: Chairman, Frannie Hutchinson, Doug Coward, Paula A. Lewis,' Cliff Barnes absent, John D. Bruhn, Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Ray Wazny, Ass!. County Administrator, Dan McIntyre, County Attorney, Don West, Public Works Director, Millie D. Feliciano, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES . It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the minutes of the meeting held June 24,2003; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT None 3. CONSENT AGENDA It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the Consent Agenda; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. ' 1. WARRANT LIST The Board approved Warrant List No. 40 through 42 and No. 44 through 47. 2. PUBLIC WORKSÆNGINEERING Approval to submit an application request and supporting Resolution No. 03-002 to the Florida Department of Environmental Protection for funding under the Florida Beach Erosion Control Program- The Board approved the application request and authorized the Chairman to sign the resolution. There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court ----- .- -- '-' -...1 EROSION DISTRICT ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TENTATIVE BUDGET PuBLIC HEARING Date: September II, 2003 Tape: ] Convened: 6:32 p.m. Adjourned: 6:33 p.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Frannie Hutchinson, Paula A. Lewis, John D. Bruhn, Cliff Barnes, Doug Coward Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Ray Wazny, Asst. County Administrator, Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney, Millie Delgado-Feliciano, Deputy Clerk 1. The Erosion Control Board was convened. 2. Public Hearing/Public Comments None 3. The Management and Budget Director read the millage and budgets for the Erosion Control Board as follows: MILLAGE AND BUDGETS FORTHE EROSION DISTRICT EROSION DISTRICT FUNDS MILLAGE BUDGET Erosion Operating Zone E 0.1 000 4,939,OI1 4. Board Discussion None 5. It was moved by Com. Coward, seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the tentative millage for fiscal year 2003/2004; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 6. It was moved by Com. Coward seconded by Com. Bruhn, to approve the tentative budget for fiscal year 2003-2004; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. There being no further business to be brought before the Erosion District, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court "" ...., EROSION DISTRICT ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA FINAL BUDGET PUBLIC HEARING Date: September 18, 2003 Tape: 1 Convened: 5:55 p.m. Adjourned: 5:56 p.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, Frannie Hutchinson, Paula A. Lewis, John D. Bmhn, absent, Cliff Barnes, Doug Coward Others Prcscnt: Doug Andcrson, Counly Administrator, Ray Wa7.ny, Ass!. County Administrator, Dan Mclntyrc, County Attorney, Millie Delgado-Feliciano, Dcputy Clerk I. The Erosion Control Board was convened. 2. Public Hearing/Public Comments None 3. The Management and Budget Director read the millage and budgets for the Erosion Control Board as follows: MILLAGE AND BUDGETS FOR THE EROSION DISTRICT EROSION DISTRICT FUNDS MILLAGE BUDGET Erosion Operating Zone E 0.1000 4,989,011 4. Board Discussion None 5. It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the millage for fiscal year 2003/2004; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimousJy. 6. It was moved by Com. Coward seconded by Com. Bsrbes, to approve the final budgct for fiscal year 2003-2004; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. Thcre bcing no fUliher business to be brought before the Erosion District, the meeting was adjourned. Chaillllan Clerk of Circuit Court 08/29/03 F'7.ABWARR FUND 184 TITLE '-" ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD --I WARRANT LIST #48- 22-AUG-2003 TO 29-AUG-2003 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION Erosion Control Operating Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 5,054.96 5,054.96 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 2,662.46 2,662.46 , , 09/12/03 F'êABWARR FUND 184 TITLE \,..- ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD """" WARRANT LIST #50- 06-SEP-2003 TO 12-SEP-2003 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION Erosion Control Operating Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 14,963.29 14,963.29 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 2,662.46 2,662.46 09/22/03 F~ABWARR FUND 184 TITLE \r ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ..., WARRANT LIST #51- 13-SEP-2003 TO 19-5EP-2003 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION Erosion Control Operating Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 2,538.59 2,538.59 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 09/26/03 :P,ABWARR FUND 184 TITLE """ ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ~ WARRANT LIST #52- 20-SEP-2003 TO 26-SEP-2003 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION Erosion Control Operating Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 3,315.75 3,315.75 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 2,662.46 2,662.46 10/08/03 FZABWARR FUND 184 TITLE \r ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD 'wi WARRANT LIST #54- 01-0CT-2003 TO 08-0CT-2003 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION Erosion Control Operating Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 15,150.14 15,150.14 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 1,863.72 1,863.72 10/15/03 F'7.ABWARR \.- ...."" ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 1 WARRANT LIST #55- 09-0CT-2003 TO 15-0CT-2003 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 184 Erosion control 'Operating Fund 36.92 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 36.92' 0.00 ~~\ /' , ~ , , '. . """ ..., 10/03/03 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 1 FZABWAR1<. WARRANT LIST # 2- 02-0CT-2003 TO 03-0CT-2003 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 184 Erosion Control Operating Fund 267.00 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 267.00 0.00 10/10/03 FZABWARR FUND 184 '-" v ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 1 WARRANT LIST # 3- 04-0CT-2003 TO 10-0CT-2003 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL Erosion Control Operating Fund 4,164.92 863.84 GRAND TOTAL: 4,164.92 863.84 ...... ....." 10/17/03 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD PAGE 1 FZABWARR WARRANT LIST # 4- 11-0CT-2003 TO 17-0CT-2003 FUND SUMMARY- EROSION FUND TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 184 Erosion Control Operating Fund 1,206.00 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 1,206.00 0.00 .' -, . ~ ,-. ....., AGENDA REQUEST ITEM NO. C-2 DATE: October 28,2003 TO: S1. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT REGULAR [ ] PUBLIC HEARING [ ] CONSENT [X] PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): EROSION 3710 gÅ;ÁAftJ../iL, r~, Richard A. Bouchard, P.E. Erosion District Manager SUBJECT: Artificial Reef Program: Approval of Work Authorization,No. 2 (C-00-12-173) with Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. ($19,238) to coordinate permitting of both the inshore and offshore reef sites. BACKGROUND: The inshore and offshore sites are two important artificial reef sites previously utilized by the Fort Pierce Sportfishing Club and St. Lucie County br deployment of artificial reef material. The inshore site is located 5.5 to 6 nautical miles east-southeast of the Fort Pierce Inlet in water depths of approximately 50 to 60 feet. Historically large concrete rubble material has been deployed within this 1.3-square mile site. The offshore site is located 12 nautical miles east-southeast of the Fort Pierce Inlet in water depths of approximately 80 to 200 feet. Historically large vessels such as the muliphen along with a few tugboats have been deployed within this 4.5-square mile site. Permits for the offshore reef site have expired and permits for the inshore reef site expire on November 1, 2003. The US. Army Corps of Engineers has indicated that no more permit extensions will be allowed for these "older" type permits and that we would have to apply for new permits for each of these sites. Once permits are secured for the larger sites then the approval process for future deployment within each specific site will be much easier. The County is seeking assistance from one of our Coastal consultants, Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc., to secure these new permits. Work Authorization NO.2 (C-00-12-173) with Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. for Phase I ($19,238) provides for the coordination of permitting of both the inshore and offshore artificial reef sites with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. Phase II focuses on the development of a long-term artificial reef plan and educational material and will be considered in the near future through outside grant programs. FUNDS: Funds will be made available in the following account: EROSION DISTRICT (Artificial Reef): 184-3710-563005-39003 ($19,238) PREVIOUS ACTION: December 12,2000: Board approved master consultant's agreement Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends Erosion District Board approval of Work Authorization NO.2 (C-OO- 12-173) with Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. ($19,238) and signature of said document by the Chairman. COMMISSION ACTION: .~ APPROVED [ ] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CONCURRENCE: Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent ¿J h Dou I s Ande~ Coun Admini~rat6r [x]County Attorney [x]Origlnating Dept. PUblicworkS~' JY CoordinationlSianatures [xlMgt. & BUdget~ 1'Y1 ý\~ [x]Erosion District (2./h'; [x¡Budget Rev, Coord, e,f\- t\ [ ]FinanceDept. · '"" ""'" COO-12·173 (WA#2) WORK AUTHORIZATION Engineering Services ReIated to Artificial Reef Permitting Pursuant to that certain Consultant Agreement between the St. Lucie County Erosion District (the "District") and Coastal Planning & Engineering, Inc. (the "Consultant") dated December 12, 2000 (the "Agreement"), Consultant agrees to perform and successfully complete the scope of work as set forth in the Consultant's "Scope of Services", "Work Compensation Sheet", and "Project Schedule" attached hereto and made a part thereof as Exhibits "A:', "B", and "C", respectively. The District agrees to compensate the Consultant as set forth in Exhibit "B" and the work shall be completed in accordance with Exhibit "C". IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the District has as hereunto subscribed and the Consultant has affixed his, its, or their names, or name, on the dates below. WITNESSES: ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT BY; CHAIRPERSON Date: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CORRECTNESS: COUNTY ATTORNEY WITNESSES: COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. BY; Print Name: Title: Date: H:fWPiMISC/CPE.WA2 ;; "" ..., EXHIBIT A Scope of Services St. Lucie County Artificial Reef Program Backl!round St. Lucie County has conducted a highly successful artificial reef program. Presently, designated within the County are two artificial reef easements which provide sufficient area for establishment of additional artificial reefs. Each easement requires the acquisition of permits before artificial reefs can be constructed within the easements. The following scope of services addresses the anticipated requirements in order to place artificial reef material within each of the two easements. Scope of Services Phase I - Federal Permit Application Development, Submittal and Coordination 1. Coordination Meeting: A coordination meeting will be conducted with St. Lucie County to address specifics of the permit application prior to development of the permit package. 2. Preparation and Submittal of Permit Application: A review will be conducted of artificial reef program documentation. Based on the artificial reef documentation, information will be developed for incorporation into the permit application. Permit drawings will be developed for submission of permit application including site characteristics drawings. The permit application will be provided to St. Lucie County for review prior to submittal of the application. Three (3) paper copies of the application, and ten (10) digital copies will be submitted to the USACE to initiate the permit processing. Phase II - Artificial Reef Program Development Coordination 1. Artificial Reef Program Development: In the short term, CPE will prepare and submit the permit application for development of two exiting artificial reef sites, allowing the County to utilize those sites when the appropriate materials are available. CPE will also work with St. Lucie County for the long term development of the program. The County has expressed an interest in a program similar to other County's along the east coast of Florida which allow for continuous artificial reef development. We will work with the County, the appropriate agencies, and the public to develop a long term program for artificial reef development in St. Lucie County. 2. Public Awareness Program Development: Many counties throughout the State of Florida have well developed websites which document the location, composition and features of cach of thcir artificial reef sites for the benefit of the public. The web site allows COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. ; "'" 'w1fiI fishermen and divers to easily access information concerning each of the reef sites, allowing for maximum utilization of the artificial reefs. We will work closely with St. Lucie County to develop a website which provides the information desired by artificial reef users. 3. Funding Assistance Coordination: The State of Florida, Department of Environmental Protection has a grant program for the development of artificial reefs throughout the State of Florida. A funding application must be developed requesting funds from the State. We will assist St. Lucie County in developing the appropriate funding application, including follow-up, with the State to acquire funding for St. Lucie County for development of artificial reefs. , , COASTAL PLANNING & ENGINEERING, INC. , ""'" ...., ...J_ ~ «(1) 00 - Oa: 00 :;; -=> «> <D ." ffio '" "'" ~"<D (1) "'«> eo ...JI "'", 0- a: W f- I !Qéñ 0 "- 00 ~ (f. ~a::: "'''' coC!d C> --=> «> «> "",0 C>°O ~ ~ r-- "'. 0 ~<': "'''' a: '" 0 (1) >- a: I a::O~éñ 0 W 0« a: Qo~a: "'~ (D~O 0 Z« => " " ",,,,,,, I WüWO r--"'. (1) "'~ (1) ,,-I '" ~ 0- - :x:ø a: 00 W -a: 0« "- f- -=> "'~ " ,'" "- '" ~"''' « 0 :;;0 , ~..,..~ :;; 0 æ:!: "'~ 0 '" a: z 0 ...JO::_ « m 0 a: « «W(1) 0« ~ ...J f-Wo:: 'V~('\ "'Z=> "''' «>~ «> "",r-- «-0 "''''. W OC>I "'''' > üffi- '" 0:: => f-_ (1) 0 ...J a:::W~CI) 0« « OZC>O:: ~<D mC!co Z -æo=> «>«> '" ",,,,«> 0 ffi<:....Io en'" ëñ (1):;;OI "'''; '" (1) ¡¡;- W "- f-O::_ 00 0 OW(1) 0« a: WC>O:: " . '" "- ""«=> " ... «> "''''''' '" ",«>", , OZO "'" . 0::«<,: t;&i "-:;; ffiéñ .... 00 .. .. "-Wo:: 00 .. .. !:!:!z::> NtOo '" '" ~ ~ '" '" I-O «>r-- cñ cñ OC>I ~ '" "'''' ~ ~ ¡jJ- ... ... " " " " " .., ro$ë;; f-f- - '" 0 "'''' -' :J' ~a:::ü 00 Ë ~ ;'5 00 0::-' :¡¡¡ Z ('j 0;'5 m iiì 0 15 mO => (.' ;:: (1) 0 jf- '" Z Cf. ~ ;:: W ~~ ~ ...... W U ;:: w z w ;:: 5 w"- '" w :;; ;:: -0 « :;; a: ...Jo !:!. Cf. 0 00 I 0. 0. 0 « Ia: '" C> "- t:« -' (.' ~ Z W ;s:I Z W W ;:: ;:: a: z!:1 w oZ w W ...J O· zQ w « -"- :;; f-"- Of- :;; Urn «« -« z .. Li:c> S,¡f- f-z 0 ...J z-z ...J- «- W Of-- 0.:;; 00 ;::z ~ -a: -~;s: ,,-a: -'0 «0 5S,¡~ «w :to z_ f-"- -f- f- «0 !i1~ ç _a:0 "-f- -'Of- ~~ f- 0« D. -- :¡¡¡ 0,,- Z 0.(1):;; o~ => a: Ow 0 «-a: wrn f-IW w Z >-0:: 0 -I"- ~.. 0. 0 0"- :;;0"- zc> w zw -' ;:: U 0::0::0 -a: ~ ~ Wz w«...J 0« (.' -=> o.ww 0::,,- w f- cr:t1:¡....I W(1» OW 0 '" -w¡.....: o::ww 00:: W Z ~~CJ) «a:o 0"- "- :¡¡¡ "- w w ~ 0 ::;<cai 0:: . . c..io w « <> o.«m '" « .,.; N ..; I "- 'N UJ W 0 :> II:: w UJ Z 0 ¡:: « z C II:: Z 0 0 0 ¡:: 0 0« 0 Z' Z C « II:: Z 0 0 0 ¡:: 0 « oð 0 -' ::¡ ~ ..; a.. ~ a.. f- e; 0« :¡¡ Z f- II! æ «:¡¡ ;:) UJ w 011:: w -w ~ z II:: a.. z ëi Of- w z io :;; w .w a.. .., ~Ó 0 (.' II! -' Z f- za:: w Z ;:)a.. > z ii5 0-, w j s: o~ 0 0. X !!!w z -' w 00 0 ;'5 ;:)w ¡:: '" -'u. « « ¡.: - 0 0 en~ ::¡ 0 a.. ;;.: w a.. :;; « m a.. f- 0 0 w -' :¡¡ 0:: W II:: « > "- w w w a.. 0:: 0 -' "- :;; « « II:: II:: W C> 0 0 w a:: "- a.. ~ "- w w w en a:: 0« -' J: « a.. Õ ü: ¡:: a:: « w II:: 0 J: en "- "- 0 · " ;;; · o <> e <> -' · ~ ,,' m ~ o "" ~, ~ o o N "' â - "'" Ii :!!: :¡; CI Z ~ i2 CI w 0 w II:: Z a. ¡; IL Z U)WW W WW..J oð 01l:::J CI -..Ie Z 0 ><l:w lI::õ:z: Z I- w-O Z ¡¡¡ U)!!::U) <I: :z: ILl-I- ..I a. x 011::0 ..I w w<l:w 0.>-..., ~ 01-0 OZII:: U) U):Ja. <I: 0 0 0 0 !!:! :>: 0 Œ :J e ..I w ¡..: II:: U) <I: a. w II:: a. ..." w oqo oqo oqo oqo l- e e e e <I: e e e e e !::! N N !::! - - e N e CD N .... .... N !::! Z - - M w ... N ... W ~ ... ... oqo e e oqo e e e e e e N N e I- - - ~ N ... e - II:: .... .... e ~ - - - .... e N .... - .... .... N U) Z U) U) U) U) 0 >- ~ >- ~ ¡:: <I: <I: ~ e e e e e II> e e :J .... oqo CD ... e .... I- Z w :¡; a. 0 ..I I- w Z > w w :¡; e a. ~ :¡; 0 U) ~ ~ ..I Z I- w 0 Z > I- W CI W ~ 0 :¡; 0 e w a. II:: :ì; Z ..., 0 a. C 0 ..I IL ~ II:: II:: w w a. > w CI 0 w II:: 0 0 e ..I II:: 0 Z <I: a. w 0 õ U) 0 ~ ¡¡: U) Z W ~ ¡:: Z 0 II:: w U) ::¡ <I: II:: ëñ a. :¡; ~ U) a. <I: <I: II:: !:: w CI I- 0 :!!: :¡; CI ::¡ e II:: Z Œ Z W 0 :J :J a. ..I a. IL .... N ... oqo r AGENDA REOUEST ITEM N"7f!' C-3 Date: October 28, 2003 Regular [ ] Public Hearing [ ] Consent [X ] TO: ST. LUCIE COUNTY EROSION DISTRICT PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY(DEPT): County Attorney Heather Young Assistant County Attorney SUBJECT: Proposed Local Bill - Codification of St. Lucie County Erosion District Special Acts BACKGROUND: See C.A. No. 03-1529 FUNDS A V AIL-(State type & No. of transaction or N/A): N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff requests pennission to present the proposed local bill to the Legislative Delegation during its meeting on December 3, 2003. COMMISSION ACTION: CONCURRENCE: [X¡ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: Approved (4·0) Brunn·Absent County Auomey: ~ Coordination/Si natures Mgt. & Budget Otner~\K. Purchasing: Originating Dept.: Other: Finance (Check for Copy on1y, if applicable): "- "wJI INTER-OFFICE MEMORANDUM ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA TO: S1. Lucie County Erosion District FROM: Heather Young, Assistant County Attorney C.A. NO: 03-1529 DATE: October 22, 2003 SUBJECT: Proposed Local Bill - Codification of S1. Lucie County Erosion District Special Acts BACKGROUND: Attached to this memorandum is a copy of a proposed local bill which would serve to codify the special acts relating to the S1. Lucie County Erosion District as required under Section 189.429, Florida Statutes. The proposed bill also clarifies and updates the provisions of the existing special acts as part of the codification. RECOMMENDATION/CONCLUSION: Staff requests permission to present the proposed local bill to the Legislative Delegation during its meeting on December 3, 2003. Respectfully submitted ~Q¿ Heather Young Assistant County Attorney Attachment HY/ Copies To: County Administrator Clerk Secretary Press Public ""' ~ 1 An act relating to 0 2 the St. Lucie County Erosion District; providing for codification of special 3 laws relating to the District; amending, codifying, reenacting, and repealing 4 all prior special acts; preserving current authority; providing definitions; 5 providing the board of the district shall be the St. Lucie County 6 Commission; providing for meetings and applicability of ch. 189, F.S.; 7 providing district powers; providing that employees of the district shall be 8 considered employees of St. Lucie County; providing that contracts for 9 services, supplies and materials shall be entered into as provided by the act 10 and general law; providing district board authorizations to amend, abolish, 11 or consolidate existing district zone boundaries and determine benefits for 12 the purpose of levying ad valorem taxes; providing district board 13 authorization to levy and collect non-ad valorem assessments; providing 14 district board authorization for issuance of bonds pursuant to general law I5 and this act; providing that the purchase of commodities and services shall 16 be in accordance with the purchasing policies of St. Lucie County; 17 providing severability; repealing chapters 67-2001 and 97-354, Laws of 18 Florida; providing an effective date. 19 20 21 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida: 22 23 Section 1. Pursuant to section 189.429. Florida Statutes. this act constitutes the 24 codification of all special acts relating to the St. Lucie Countv Erosion District. located in St. 25 Lucie County. It is the intent of the Legislature to provide a single. comprehensive special act 26 charter for the District. including all current legislative authority granted to the District by its 27 several legislative enactments and any additional authority granted by this act and chapters 189. 28 Florida Statutes. and chapters 67-2001 and 97-354. Laws of Florida. as amended from time to 29 time. It is further the intent of this act to preserve all District authority. including the authority to 30 annually assess and levy against the taxable property in the District. 31 32 Section 2. Chapters 67-2001 and 97-354. Laws of Florida. relating to the St. Lucie 33 County Erosion District. are amended. codified. reenacted. and repealed as provided herein. 34 35 Section 3. The St. Lucie Countv Erosion District is re-created and the charter for the 36 District is re-created and reenacted to read: 37 38 Section 1. This act may be known and cited as the "St. Lucie County Erosion District Act." '-' ...., 1 2 Section 2. LEGISLATIVE STATEMENT. It is hereby declared as a matter oflegislative 3 determination that tidal waves and currents, high waters, flood waters, and other causes have 4 given rise to soil and beach erosion problems in St. Lucie County and that it is the intent and 5 purpose of this act to provide means to alleviate such conditions in said county. 6 7 Section 3. DEFINITIONS. As used in this act. unless the context otherwise requires: 8 (a) "District" means the St. Lucie County Erosion District created bv this act. 9 (b) "Countv board" means the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County. 10 (c) "District board" or "board" means the Board of County Commissioners of St. Lucie County II constituting the governing body of said district as provided in this act. 12 (d) "Erosion prevention facilities" means and includes any seawalls. groins. pumping stations. 13 breakwaters. dams, bulkheads. fills, floodways. or anv and all other works or structures of any 14 type whatsoever necessary or useful in the protection ofthe lands. including beaches. within said 15 district from tidal waves. tidal currents, high waters. flood waters and other causes of beach and 16 soil erosion. and any other purposes appurtenant. necessarv or incidental thereto. and shall 17 include all real and personal property and any interests therein. rights. easements. and franchises 18 of any nature whatsoever relating to any such erosion prevention facilities and necessary or 19 convenient for the construction. acquisition. reconstruction. improvement. operation. and 20 maintenance thereof. 21 (e) "Cost" as applied to erosion prevention facilities includes the cost of construction. 22 reconstruction. acquisition, improvement. operation. or maintenance of said facilities: the cost of 23 all labor. materials. machinery. and equipment: the cost of all lands and interest therein. real or 24 personal property. rights. easements. and franchises of any nature whatsoever: financing charges: 25 interest prior to and during construction and after the completion of the acquisition. construction. 26 reconstruction. or improvement of such erosion prevention facilities: the creation of initial 27 reserve or debt service funds: bond discount, if any: cost of plans and specifications. survevs. and 28 estimates of costs and revenues: cost of engineering. financiaL and legal services: and all other 29 expenses necessary or incidental in determining the feasibility or practicability of such 30 acquisition. construction. reconstruction. or improvement: administrative expenses and such 31 other expenses as may be necessary or incidental to financing authorized bv this act. including 2 '-' -...; 1 reimbursement of the countv or anv other person, finn. or corporation for anv monevs advanced 2 to said district for anv expenses incurred bv said district in connection with anv of the foregoing 3 items of cost, or the creation of such district. 4 (f) "Secretarv/Treasurer" means the clerk of the circuit court of St. Lucie Countv. Florida. who 5 shall serve ex officio as secretarv and treasurer of the erosion district BREI shElH dye to the board 6 a ~ood and sufficient sllfet',' È!Of!d iR the sum ef$l.QOO, eOf!ditiened upon his or her faithfully 7 13erforffiiR~ the d¡.¡ties ef the offiee and well af!d tmly aeeoHRtif!12: fer all ffiOf!e','S ef the erosioR 8 district cornin!: into his er her custody or cof!tro!. The 13remilIDl of this bond shall be Ðaid out of 9 the funds of the erosion district, and the bond shall be ap13ro','ed by the board and shall be filed in 10 the office of the State COffil3troller at Tallahassee. The treasurer shall be the custodian of all 11 funds belonging to the board and the erosion district, and such funds mav be disbursed onlv upon 12 the order of the board, signed bv the secretarv and countersigned bv the chairperson of the board. 13 The board is authorized to select as a depositorv. anv bank or trust companv organized under the 14 laws of the United States or the State of Florida and authorized pursuant to general law to accept 15 deposit of countv funds. Such funds shall be deposited bv the treasurer in such depositorv upon 16 such terms and conditions as the board mav deem iust and reasonable. and mav be deposited in 17 the name of St. Lucie Countv as long as thev are properlv accounted for bv the treasurer. 18 (g) "Bonds" means anv evidence of indebtedness issued and delivered bv the district for 19 consideration and includes without limitation revenue bonds. general obligation bonds. limited 20 tax bonds. non-ad valorem assessment bonds, notes, and other obligations. 2] (h) "Non-ad valorem assessment" means onlv those assessments which are not based upon 22 millage and which can become a lien against a homestead as pennitted in s. 4, Art. X of the State 23 Constitution. 24 25 Section ±~. DISTRICT EST ABLISHMENL STATUS; POWERS. There is hereby created and 26 established in St. Lucie Countv. a dependent special district, to be known as the "St. Lucie 27 Countv Erosion District." The district is a body corporate and politic if! 8t. Lucie COHntj', 28 Florida, exercising essential governmental functions for the purpose hereinafter set forth~,...te--be 29 131owf! as the "St. Lucie COHnty Erosion District." The Saià-district's powers shall include have 30 the power to sue; to contract; to adopt and use a corporate seal and alter the same; aHà-to 31 purchase, hold, lease, or otherwise acquire and convey such real property and personal property 3 ~ ,.., 1 and interests therein; and any other authority granted by chapter 189, Florida Statutes, or other 2 applicable general law, as they may be amended from time to time, as may be necessary or 3 proper to carry out the purposes of this act. 4 5 Section ,2,4. BOUNDARIES. The territorial boundaries of the district shall coincide with the 6 territorial boundaries of St. Lucie County and shall include all lands and property within the 7 county, including lands and property within incorporated areas of the county, within any district 8 in the county and within the unincorporated area of the county. 9 10 Section~. GOVERNING BOARD; CREATION; ORGANIZATION. The governing body of 11 the St. Lucie County Erosion District shall be known and designated as the "Board of 12 Commissioners of the St. Lucie County Erosion District," and shall be made up ex officio of the 13 five county commissioners of St. Lucie County, who shall serve ex officio as the governing 14 body. ,A.S soon as practicable after this aet beeomes law, t.fle board shall meet and organize b)' 15 the eleetion from their IlURlber, a ellair and a viee ehair. The chair and vice chair shall each hold 16 office at the will of the board and until their successor is duly elected by the board. The chair 17 and vice chair serving at the time of this act's effective date shall continue to serve until 18 expiration of their terms and their successor is duly elected. The chair shall preside at all 19 meetings of the district and perform such duties as the erosion district may prescribe. The vice 20 chair shall perform the duties of the chair in the absence of the chair. The board shall hold at 21 least one regular meeting per month. Special meetings shall be held pursuant to chapter 189, 22 Florida Statutes, as it may be amended from time to time. In the event of a bona fide emergency 23 situation, a meeting to deal with the emergency may be held as necessary, with reasonable 24 notice, so long as it is subsequently ratified by the board. Three members of the board shall 25 constitute a quorum to transact business. 26 27 Section 6. .'.3 used in this aet, unless the eoRte¡¡t otherwise reE uires: 28 (a) "District" means the St. Lueie County Erosion Diotriet ereated by this act. 29 (b) "CoURt)' board" means the Board of County CommissioÐers of St. Lueie COURt)'. 30 (e) "Distriet boan!" er "board" means the Board ofColiRt)' Cemmissioners ofSt. Lueie Celinty 31 eonstituting the governing bod)' of said distrie{ as provided iB this oot. 4 '-' ....,¡ ] Cd) "Erosion ]3Te'lention facilities" meRHS !If!d includes any seawalls, groins, ]3umpiag statioas, 2 breakwaters, dams, bulkheads, fills, floodways, or RHY RHd all oilier works or struct1ffes of any 3 typc 'Nhatsoeyer necessary or useful ill tRe protection of the I¡ flEis, if!eludillg beaches, within saiEi 4 district from tidal wa','es, tidal currents, high waters, flood waters and other causes of beach and 5 soil erosion, and aay other pUfj'Joses afJpurtellRHt, lIecessary or illciEienta! thereto, aREi Ðhall 6 incluEie all real anE! persollal ]3roperty anE! any iRtereÐts thereiR, rigllts, easements, IIDd fFaflchises 7 of any aature wflatsOe'ier re]atillg to any such erosioR preventislI facilities aRE! Recessary or 8 cO¡¡"ienieRt for the 68astructioR, aequisitioR, reconstractiof!, improvemeRt, o]3eratioR, aRd 9 maiateaanee iliereof. 10 C e) "Cost" as afJp]ied to erosioR ]3re\'entioa facilities iRcludes the eost of e(JRstruction, I] reconstractioa, aequisition, improvemellt, o]3eratiofl, or maiRtef!anee of said faci]iiies; the cost of 12 all labor, materials, machillery, aREi eEjuipmeat; the eos{ sf all ]¡ fIds and intereÐt thereiR, rea! or 13 persona! ]3roperty, rights, easemel!ts, and ÍFanehises sf aflY lIature v,flatsoe'ler; financiag charges; ]4 illterest prior to aRd daring eSllstructi811 and after the eom]3letioll of the acquiÐition, cOlIstruNioll, ] 5 recolIstractioll, or improyement of such erosioll preyelltioll facilities; the creatioll of iaitia] ] 6 resen'e or debt seriÎce ftlllEis; bOlld diseouRt, if any; cos{ sf plans ¡ fId specificatiolls, SUf'ieys, aRd ] 7 estimates of COÐtS alld reYßnaes; cost of 8I'lgilleering, fillaRcia], anE! legal services; and all other ] 8 Ð;[]3ellses lIecessary or illcidental ia determiaillg the feasibility or practicability of such ] 9 acquisitioll, cORstruction, reeonstructioR, or im]3ro\'ement; aEimiRistratiye e)[peRGeS aad such 20 other expeRses as may be Recessary or inciEiel!ta] to fiÐanciRg authorized by this act, iacludillg 2] reimbursement of the county or any otHer person, firm, or cOfj'Joration for aRY moneys advanced 22 to said Eiistrict for allY expenses incurred by said dis{rict in cOl1!!ection witH any ofilie f-oregoing 23 items of cost, or the creation of Ðuch district. 24 Cf) "Secretary/Treasurer" means ilie clerk of the circuit csurt ofSt. Lueie Couñty, Florida, 'Nho 25 shall scrye en officio as secretary and treasurer of tRe erosion Eiistrict and shall gi'ie to the board 26 a good and sufficient surety bOIlE! in the sum of $ I ,000, eonditioned apOIl his or her faithfully 27 perf-orming the dmies of the office anE! well aRE! truly aecouatillg for all moaeys of the erosion 28 distriet coming ints his or her cus{oE!y or coRtro!. The premium ehms bORd sliall be paid om of 29 the funds of the erosioR Eiistriet, anE! the bonE! shall be afJj3ro'ieli by tae board and shall be filed in 30 the office of tae 8tate Comptroller at Tallahassee. The treasurer shall be tHe custodian of all 3] [ualis belo¡¡gi¡¡g to the board allEi the erosion district, and such funds may be Eiisblli'sed OR]y Uj30R 5 '"" >...I 1 the order of the board, signed by the secretary and Ðountersigned by the chairman of the bOæ'd. 2 The board is aHthorized to seleÐt as a àepository, any banlc or trust company organized lH1der the 3 laws of the United States or the State offleriàa and autftorizeà plli'suant to general law to aÐcept 4 doposit of ceHnty funds. Sue-h funds shall be deposited by the treasHrer in sllen depository UfJOR 5 sHch terms anà eonditieRs as the beard ma)' deem just and reascmable, and may be deposited in 6 the flame of St. Lueie Coooty as leRg as tfle:,' are J3reJ3erly accollllted f-or by the treasurer. 7 (g) "Bonds" means any evideRee of indebteàness issued and àelivereà by the àistriet f-or 8 cORGideration and iReludes without limitatioR re','eooe bonds, general 8sligatioR bonds, limited 9 tax bonds, nOR ad ';alerem assessment !JeRds, Rotes, and other 0!J1igatioRs. 10 (n) "}Jon ad yalÐrem assessment" means oBly those assessmeRts whieh are not based upon 11 millage and which can become alien agaiRGt a homestead as permitted in s. 4, fJt. X of the State 12 ConstitutioR. 13 14 Section 7. DISTRICT POWERS. The district board for and on behalf of the said district created 15 hereunder, in addition to and supplementing other powers granted in this act. and any other 16 applicable general law, is hereby authorized and empowered: 17 (a) To adopt rules and regulations for its own government and proceedings and to adopt an 18 official seal for the district and for complete exercise of jurisdiction and control over district 19 operations, proj ects, and facilities. 20 (b) To employ engineers, attorneys, accountants, financial, or other experts and such other agents 21 and employees as the satd-district board may require or deem necessary to effectuate the 22 purposes of this act, or to contract for any of such services. All employees of the district shall be 23 considered employees of St. Lucie County who shall be assigned to the district, and whose salary 24 and other costs of employment shall be paid by the county from funds held on behalf of the 25 district. Such employees, except collective bargaining unit employees, shall be subject to the 26 personnel rules and regulations, and shall participate in the employee benefit and retirement 27 benefit plans ofSt. Lucie County. Collective bargaining unit employees of the district shall be 28 members of a collective bargaining unit of St. Lucie County employees pursuant to general law. 29 (c) To acquire, construct, reconstruct, improve, operate, or maintain erosion prevention facilities 30 in and for the said district, including the acquisition of any erosion prevention facilities 31 heretofore constructed by any person, firm, corporation, or other body, or heretofore partially 6 '-' "wi 1 constructed by any person, finn, corporation, or other body, and the completion of such erosion 2 prevention facilities by such district, and to have the exclusive control and jurisdiction of such 3 erosion prevention facilities; to issue its bonds to pay all or any part of the cost of such 4 acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement, operation, or maintenance of such 5 erosion prevention facilities. 6 (d) To levy and assess ad valorem taxes without limitation of rate or amount on all taxable 7 property within said district for the purpose of paying principal of and interest on any bonds 8 issued pursuant to this act or for the operation and maintenance of such erosion prevention 9 facilities or other corporate purposes of said district. 10 (e) To assess, levy, and collect non-ad valorem assessments upon property within the district as 11 authorized by this act. chaPters 189 and 197, Florida Statutes, as they may be amended from time 12 to time. 13 (f) To regulate the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement, or maintenance of 14 erosion prevention facilities within the district, and to grant or deny pennits for the construction 15 of any erosion prevention facilities in the saiè district. However, if the satd-erosion prevention 16 facilities are to be located in whole or in part within the territorial boundaries of any 17 municipality, the approval of the governing body of such municipality shall also be obtained 18 before the issuance by the district of a pennit for the construction of such erosion prevention 19 facilities. The district shall have authority to enjoin any unauthorized construction or work done 20 which does not comply with any pennit issued in any court of competent j urisdiction, and a 21 certified copy of the resolution of the district denying a pennit for such construction shall 22 constitute prima facie evidence in all courts that such construction would be detrimental to the 23 prevention of erosion. 24 (g) To enter upon any lands, either within or without the district, through its officials, agents, or 25 employees, or through contractors and their officials, agents, or employees in the perfonnance of 26 work or services for the district, in order to make surveys and examinations to accomplish the 27 necessary purposes of the district, including preliminary surveys and other work. The district 28 shall be liable for any actual damages done in connection therewith, and no unnecessary damage 29 shall be done. The provisions of this subsection may be enforced by the district in any court of 30 competent jurisdiction. 7 '-' -....I I (h) To acquire in the name of the district by purchase, gift, or the exercise of the right of eminent 2 domain such lands and rights and interest therein, including lands under water and riparian rights 3 and to acquire such personal property as it may deem necessary in connection with the 4 acquisition, construction, reconstruction, improvement, maintenance, or operation of such 5 erosion prevention facilities and to hold and dispose of all reaJ and personal property under its 6 controL 7 (i) To exercise exclusive jurisdiction, control, and supervision over any erosion prevention 8 facilities owned, operated, and maintained by the district and to make and enforce such rules and 9 regulations for the maintenance and operation of such erosion prevention facilities as in the 10 judgment of the district board are necessary or desirable for the efficient operation of such II erosion prevention facilities in accomplishing the purposes of this act. 12 (j) To acquire, hold, and improve beachfront lands as a part of erosion prevention facilities, and 13 to operate such beachfront lands for public purposes, including public bathing facilities, and to 14 comply with any agreements made with the Federal Government relative to such beachfront 15 lands for which financial assistance has been given to the district by the Federal Government. 16 (k) To join with any other districts, cities, towns, counties, or other political subdivisions, public 17 agencies, or authorities in the exercise of common powers. 18 (I) To enter into contracts for the purchase of services, supplies, materials, and equipment 19 pursuant to this act and general laws, as they may be amended from time to time. 20 (m) Subject to such provisions and restrictions as may be set forth in the resolution authorizing 21 or securing any bonds issued under the provisions of this act, to enter into contracts or 22 agreements with the United States of America or any agency or instrumentality thereof, the state 23 or any agency or instrumentaJity thereof, or with any county, municipality, district, authority, or 24 political subdivision, private corporation, partnership, association, or individuaJ providing for or 25 relating to erosion prevention facilities and any other matters relevant thereto or otherwise 26 necessary to effect the purposes of this act, and to receive and accept rrom the United States of 27 America, or any agency or instrumentality thereof, the state or any agency or instrumentaJity 28 thereof, or any other public body, grants or loans for or in aid of the planning, construction, 29 reconstruction, improvement, or financing of any erosion prevention facilities and to receive and 30 accept aid or contributions or loans rrom any other source of either money, property, labor, or 31 other things of value, to be held, used, and applied only for the purpose for which such grants, 8 \.r ....,.¡ 1 contributions, or loans may be made. The 8aià district shall have power to provide funds in 2 order to qualify for financial and other assistance by federal, state, or other governmental 3 agencies or political subdivisions and to do and perform all acts necessary to obtain any required 4 federal or state permits for the carrying out of the purposes provided in this act, and to adopt all 5 proceedings and perform all acts necessary to comply with and perform all such contracts or 6 agreement, referred to in this subsection. 7 (n) To rent, lease, and sell, exchange, transfer, or otherwise dispose of, or to grant options for 8 any such purposes with respect to any real or personal property or interest therein. 9 (0) To make and execute financing agreements, lease-purchase agreements, contracts, deeds, and 10 other instruments necessary or convenient to the exercise of its powers and functions, including 11 contracts with persons, firms, corporations, federal, state, and local governmental agencies and 12 instrumentalities, and to cooperate with such persons with reference to any of the powers hereby 13 granted. 14 (p) To provide adequate insurance on all real and personal property, equipment, employees, and 15 other personnel. 16 ( q) To do all other acts and things necessary or proper in the exercise of the powers herein 17 granted. 18 19 Section 8. AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS~ ZONES. (1) It is hereby found, determined and 20 declared that all of the lands and real estate within the said district will be benefited by the 21 acquisition, construction, improvement, or maintenance of erosion prevention facilities 22 authorized by this act and the full faith and credit and ad valorem taxing power of the said 23 district without limitation as to rate or amount shall be pledged for the payment of the principal 24 of and interest on any bonds issued by the said district pursuant to this act. It is further found, 25 determined, and declared that for the purposes of the levy and collection of ad valorem taxes 26 within the said district, the lands and real estate therein saall be aRt:! are heres)' classified and 27 divided into ffim tive zones which are hereby designated as zones A, B, C and D, with the zones 28 having and said zones shall have the following boundaries: 29 30 (a) Zone A--Beginning at the intersection ofthe south line of section 7, township 35 south, range 31 41 east and the Atlantic Ocean; thence northeasterly along the Atlantic Ocean to the centerline of 9 ~ ......, the Fort Pierce ship channel; thence southwesterly along the centerline of said channel to the 2 centerline of the intracoastal waterway; thence southeasterly along said centerline to its 3 intersection with the south line of section 12, township 35 south, range 40 east extended; thence 4 east along said extension and the south line of said section 12 to the southeast comer of said 5 section 12; thence east along the south line of section 7, township 35 south, range 41 east to the 6 point of beginning. 7 8 (b) Zone B--Beginning at the intersection of the south line of section 7, township 35 south, range 9 41 east and the Atlantic Ocean; thence southeasterly along the Atlantic Ocean to the south line of 10 section 22, township 36 south, range 41 east; thence west along the south line of said section 22 II and the extension thereofto the centerline of the intracoastal waterway; thence northwesterly 12 along the centerline of the intracoastal waterway to its intersection with the south line of section 13 12, township 35 south, range 40 east extended; thence east along said extension and the south 14 line of said section 12 to the southeast corner of said section 12; thence east along the southline 15 of section 7, township 35 south, range 41 east to the point of beginning. 16 17 (c) Zone C--Except for lands in zones A and B, all lands east of a line beginning on the north 18 county line at the northwest corner of section 3, township 34 south, range 38 east; thence south 19 to the southwest comer of section 34, township 34 south, range 38 east; east to the southeast 20 corner of section 35, township 34 south, range 38 east; south to the southwest comer of section 21 12, township 36 south, range 38 east; east to the northwest comer of section 15, township 36 22 south, range 39 east; south to the southwest comer of section 34, township 37 south, range 39 23 east, at the south county line. 24 25 (d) Zone D--Alllands in St. Lucie County west of zone C. 26 27 (e) Zone E-Alllands within District boundaries. 28 29 (2) It is further hereby found, determined, and declared that as between the lands and real estate 30 located within said zone A to D, inclusive, the percentages of the total benefits which such lands 31 and real estate located within such zones, will receive from the acquisition, construction, 10 \"..- ....I 1 reconstruction, improvement, or maintenance of the erosion prevention facilities authorized by 2 this act are as follows: 3 Zone A--Five and nine tenths percent 4 Zone B--One and three tenths percent 5 Zone C--Eighty-three and four tenths percent 6 Zone D--Nine and four tenths percent 7 8 (3) As authorized by Section 8.(5) of this act, Zone E, created pursuant to Countv COl1IDlission 9 Resolution 97-05 was established for the purpose of funding the District's share of the costs of 10 the United States Armv Corp of Engineers Fort Pierce Florida Shore Protection Proiect and 11 future proiects for which the Board determines the lands and real estate within Zone E receive 12 100% of proiect benefits. 13 14 (~F;) Any ad valorem taxes in ~ said assessed bv the district, for the payment of debt service or 15 reserves on bonds or other obligations issued by the said district or for the operation and 16 maintenance of the erosion prevention facilities and other corporate purposes of the said district, 17 shall be levied in each zone in ratio to the percentage of benefits set out above for said zone A to 18 D, both inclusive, and of the total amount of such ad valorem taxes levied on the taxable 19 property in the saià-district at any time, the separate amounts to be levied in each of such zones 20 shall be the percentage set out for such zones above of such total amount. In the event that the 21 full amounts of suefl taxes se-Ievied in any zone shall not be collected in any year, the deficit 22 shall be paid from general funds of the district or shall be levied in the succeeding year on all 23 taxable property of the entire district, and the district shall be mandatorily obligated to levy and 24 collect ad valorem taxes \\'Íthout limitations as to rate or amount on all taxable property in the 25 entire district to the full extent necessary to pay all principal of and interest on any bonds or other 26 obligations issued by the saHklistrict, or such operation and maintenance and other corporate 27 purposes of the district. The amount of any deficit in collections in any zone in any year shall, 28 however, notwithstanding that such deficit may have been made up from general funds of the 29 district or from ad valorem taxes levied on all taxable property in the entire district, be levied in 30 each succeeding year on all taxable property in the zone in which such deficit occurs until such 31 deficit has been made up in full and all amounts reimbursed to the general funds of the district or II '"" ....¡ I to the owners of taxable property in other zones for payments made on account of such deficits, 2 it being the express intention of this act as far as the payment of debt service on any bonds or 3 other obligations of the district or such operation and maintenance and other corporate purposes 4 of the district are concerned, the entire taxable property in all of the saiè-district shall be subject 5 to the levy of ad valorem taxes without limit as to rate or amount for the full payment of all such 6 debt service and operation and maintenance and other corporate purposes of said district, but that 7 as between the zones within such entire district, the district shall continue to levy and relevy 8 sufficient ad valorem taxes on the taxable property in the zone in which a deficit occurs until any 9 amounts which may have been previously paid by any other zone to make up such deficit have 10 been paid in full. Any 5H€h-reimbursement to the owners of taxable property of any zone for II amounts collected in such zone for any deficits in any other zone may be in the form of 12 reductions in the amount of taxes to be collected in such zone, but only after the amount of such 13 reimbursement shall be available in cash for application to debt service on such bonds or other 14 obligations or for the operation and maintenance or other corporate purposes of the district. IS 16 Œ4) Upon the effective date of this act, the district board shall be authorized to amend by 17 resolution existing zone boundaries, abolish, or consolidate existing zones, create new zones, and 18 determine the percentage benefit accruing to lands within said zones as a result of district 19 projects, programs, and activities. Any ad valorem taxes levied for district purposes shall be 20 levied in each zone in proportion to the percentage of benefits detennined by the board for the 21 new, amended, or consolidated zones. 22 23 (Q~) All such taxes shall be levied and collected as a separate special tax and the county board, as 24 the governing body of such district, shall certify in each year to the property appraiser of the 25 county the total amount of the ad valorem taxes to be levied in such district and the separate 26 amount to be levied in each of said zones in each year and the said property appraiser shall levy 27 and collect such special taxes at the same time and in the same manner as other general county 28 taxes are collected. Such taxes, when collected by the county tax collector, shall be paid and 29 turned over to the proper officials of feF-the district for application in the manner provided in this 30 act. 31 12 \w ....,¡ I Section 9. NON-AD VALOREM ASSESSMENTS. The board is hereby authorized and 2 empowered by resolution to assess, levy, and collect non-ad valorem assessments for the 3 acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, development, improvement, 4 maintenance, repair, management, or operation of district facilities authorized by this act 5 pursuant to chapters 189 and 197, Florida Statutes, as they may be amended from time to time. 6 Such special assessments shall be levied only on benefited real property at a rate based upon the 7 special benefit accruing to such property, from the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, 8 rehabilitation, development, improvement, maintenance, repair, management, or operation. Cost 9 may include the cost of all labor and materials, the cost of all lands, property rights, easements, 10 and franchises acquired, expenses associated with the issuance of bonds secured in whole or in II part by non-ad valorem assessments, including, but not limited to, financing charges, the 12 establishment of reasonable reserves and/or the purchase of insurance and surety bonds, interest 13 prior to and during construction and for I year after completion of construction, discount on the 14 sale of bonds, costs of plans and specifications, surveys of estimates of costs and revenues, cost IS of engineering, financial, and legal services, and all other expenses necessary or incident to 16 determining the feasibility or practicability of the undertaking, administrative expense, and such 17 other expense as may be necessary or incidental to the financing authorized by this act. Non-ad 18 valorem assessments shall be liens, coequal with the lien of all state, county, district, and 19 municipal taxes, superior in dignity to all other liens, titles, and claims, until paid, shall bear 20 interest at the rate prescribed by law for ad valorem taxes, and shall be levied and collected using 21 the procedures provided in chapter 197, Florida Statutes, as it may be amended from time to 22 time, or such other method as the district may prescribe. 23 24 Section 10. BONDS ISSUANCE. (I) The district board for and on behalf of the district is 25 authorized to provide by resolution from time to time for the issuance of general obligation 26 bonds, limited tax revenue bonds, revenue bonds, and non-ad valorem assessment bonds to pay 27 all or part of the cost of acquisition, construction, reconstruction, rehabilitation, development, or 28 improvement of any projects, facilities, or activities provided for in this act, or for the purpose of 29 refunding any such bonds of the district which are then outstanding, including any redemption 30 premium thereon and any interest accrued or to accrue to the date of redemption. The district 31 board shall also have the authority to provide by resolution for the issuance of other obligations 13 '-' -...I ] to pay all or part of the cost of maintenance, repair, management, or operation of district projects, 2 faci1ities, or activities. However, the issuance of general obligation bonds or limited taJ( revenue 3 Bonds shall have been approved at an election of the qualified electors who reside in such 4 district, such election to be called, noticed, and conducted as provided by law. The bonds of 5 each issue shall be dated, shall bear interest at such rate or rates as shall not exceed the maximum 6 bond interest rate provided by general law, shall mature at such time or times not exceeding 40 7 years from the date or dates of the bonds as may be detennined by the board and may be 8 redeemable before maturity, at the option of the board, under such terms and conditions and at 9 such prices as may be fixed by the board prior to the issuance of such bonds. The board shall 10 determine the form of such bonds, including any interest coupons to be attached thereto, and ] ] shall fix the denomination or denominations of such bonds and the place or places of payment of ] 2 principal and interest, which may be at any bank or trust company within or without the state. 13 Such authorizing resolution may further provide that such bonds may be executed manually or ]4 by the engraved, lithographed, or facsimile signature ofthe chainnan of the board. The seal of ] 5 the district may be affixed or lithographed, engraved, or otherwise reproduced in facsimi1e on 16 such bonds and shall be attested by the manual or facsimile signature of the secretary or treasurer ] 7 of the saià district; provided that the signature of at least one of the officials executing such 18 bonds, including the registrar authenticating such bonds, shall be a manual signature. In case any ] 9 officer whose signature or facsimi1e of at least one of the officials executing such bonds shall 20 cease to be such officer before the delivery of such bonds, such signature or facsimile thereof 2] shall nevertheless be valid and sufficient for all purposes the same as if he had remained in office 22 until such delivery. Such bonds may be issued in coupon or registered form as the board may 23 determine in such authorizing resolution and provision may be made for the registration of any 24 coupon bonds as to principal alone and also as to principal and interest, and for the reconversion 25 of coupon bonds or of any bond registered as to principal and interest. The board may sell such 26 bonds either at public or private sale and for such price as it may detennine to be for the best 27 interests of the district, but no such sale may be made at a price that requires the payment of 28 interest in excess of the maximum bond interest rate provided by general law. 29 30 (2) The proceeds of the sale of any general obligation bonds, limited tax bonds, revenue bonds, 31 and non-ad valorem assessment bonds shall be used solely for the payment of the costs, ]4 '-' ..." 1 including engineering, financial, and legal expenses, of the acquisition, construction, 2 reconstruction, rehabilitation, development, maintenance, or improvement of such facilities or 3 the refunding of bonds outstanding, and proceeds from the issuance of other obligations of the 4 district may additionally be used to pay the costs of repair, management, maintenance, or 5 operation of district facilities. The proceeds of bonds issued under the authority of this section 6 shall be disbursed in such manner and under such restrictions as the board may provide in the 7 authorizing resolution. Prior to the preparation or issuance of definitive bonds, the board may, 8 under like restrictions, issue interim receipts or temporary notes or other forms or such 9 temporary obligations with or without coupons, exchangeable for definitive bonds when such 10 bonds have been executed and are available for delivery. The board may also provide for the II replacement of any bonds, which have become mutilated, destroyed, or lost upon proper 12 indemnification. 13 14 (3) The board may provide that the bonds issued hereunder shall be payable from and secured by 15 a pledge of anyone or more of the following sources: 16 (a) Revenues of anyone or more district facilities now owned or hereafter acquired or 1 7 constructed by the district. 18 (b) Proceeds from the sale or lease of all or any part of any district facilities now or hereafter 19 owned by the district, as such facilities may be extended, enlarged, or improved. 20 (c) Any money received by the district from the United States or any agency or instrumentality 21 thereof or from any other governmental agency or person in connection with any district 22 facilities or in repayment of any advances made by the district for all or any part of the cost of 23 any district facilities. 24 (d) The full faith, credit, and taxing power of the district, or limited ad valorem taxes levied by 25 the district, and such bonds may be additionally secured by a pledge of revenues, sale or lease 26 proceeds or money received by the district from the United States or any agency or 27 instrumentality thereof or other governmental agency or person as herein authorized. The board 28 may provide that such bonds shall be payable as to principal and interest in the first instance 29 from such revenues, sale, or lease proceeds or money received by the district from the United 30 States or any agency or instrumentality thereof or any other person. 15 \w -..I 1 (e) The proceeds of any sale or lease of district facilities or property, after paying all costs in 2 connection therewith. 3 (f) The proceeds of any non-ad valorem assessments levied pursuant to this act. 4 5 Section 11. BOND TRUST AGREEMENT. In the discretion of the board, any bonds issued 6 under the provisions of this act may be secured by a trust agreement by and between the district 7 and a corporate trustee, which may be any trust company or bank having the powers of a trust 8 company within or without the state. Such trust agreement or the resolution providing for the 9 issuance of such bonds may contain such provisions for protecting and enforcing the rights and 10 remedies of the bondholders as may be reasonable and proper and not in violation of law, 11 including covenants setting forth the duties of the district in relation to the acquisition, 12 construction, reconstruction, improvement, maintenance, repair, lease, operation, and insurance 13 of any district projects, facilities, or activities in connection with which such bonds shall have 14 bee n authorized, the custody, safeguarding, or application of all moneys, and conditions or 15 limitations with respect to the issuance of additional bonds. It shall be lawful for any bank or 16 trust company incorporated under the laws of Florida, which may act as depositary of the 17 proceeds of bonds or of revenue, or other funds to furnish such indemnifying bonds or to pledge 18 such securities as may be required by the board. Any such trust agreement or resolution may set 19 forth the rights and remedies of the bondholders and of the trustee under any such trust 20 agreement, and may restrict the individual right of action by bondholders. In addition to the 21 foregoing, any such trust agreement or resolution may contain such other provisions, as the board 22 may deem reasonable and proper for the security of the bondholders. All expenses incurred in 23 carrying out the provisions of such trust agreement or resolution shall be treated as a part of the 24 costs of the operation of the district facilities. 25 26 Section 12. NOTICE OF BONDS ISSUANCE. Prior to the issuance of any bonds, the district 27 board may, in its discretion, publish a notice at least once in a newspaper published in the 28 County of St. Lucie and circulating in the district, stating the date of adoption of the resolution 29 authorizing such bonds, and the amount, maximum rate of interest and maturity of such bonds 30 and the purposes in general terms for which such bonds are to be issued, and further stating that 31 any action or proceeding questioning the validity of such bonds or of the creatioB sf said district, 16 '-' -....I I or of the proceedings authorizing the issuance thereof, or of any covenants made therein, must be 2 instituted within 20 days after the first publication of such notice, or the validity of such bonds 3 0 \r of the ereatioli of saie! e!istriet, or of such proceedings or covenants shall not be thereafter 4 questioned in any court whatsoever. If no such action or proceeding is so instituted within such 5 20-day period then the validity of such bonds, the ereatisn of saie! e!istriet, and such proceedings 6 and covenants shall be conclusive, and all persons or parties whosoever shall be forever barred 7 ITom questioning the validity of such bonds, tHe ei'eatisa sf saie! e!istrie.t, or such proceedings or 8 covenants in any court whatsoever. 9 10 Section 13. BOND COVENANTS. All bonds issued hereunder shall be and constitute, and have II all the qualities and incidents of negotiable instruments under the law merchant and the 12 negotiable instruments law of Florida, and shall not be invalid for any irregularity or defect in the 13 proceedings for the issuance and sale thereof and shall be incontestable in the hands of bona fide 14 purchasers for value. No proceedings in respect to the issuance of such bonds shall be necessary IS except such as are required by this act. The provisions of this act shall constitute an irrevocable 16 contract between said district and the holders of such bonds or coupons thereof issued pursuant 17 to the provisions hereof. Any holder of such bonds may either at law or in equity, by suit, action 18 or mandamus, force and compel the performance of the duties required by this act or of any of 19 the officers or persons herein mentioned in relation to said bonds, or the levy, assessment, 20 collection, and enforcement and application ofthe taxes pledged for the payment of the principal 21 and interest thereof. 22 23 Section 14. PUBLIC PURPOSE DECLARATION. The exercise of the powers conferred by this 24 act constitutes the performance of essential public functions and any erosion prevention 25 facilities acquired, constructed, reconstructed, or improved under the provisions of this act 26 constitute public property used for public purposes. 27 28 Section IS. BONDS AS LEGAL INVESTMENTS. All bonds issued pursuant to this act shall be 29 and constitute legal investments for state, county, municipal, and all other public funds and for 30 banks, savings banks, insurance companies, executors, administrators, trustees, and all other 17 '-' ....,I I fiduciaries; and shall also be and constitute securities eligible as collateral security for all state, 2 county, municipal, or other public funds. 3 4 Section 16. BONDS AS PAYMENTS. The &!iè district shall have the power to enter into 5 agreements for the delivery of any bonds at one time or fiom time to time as full or partial 6 payment for the services of any engineer or work done by any contractor who may have been 7 retained or hired or been awarded a contract for the construction of all or any part of such erosion 8 prevention facilities. However, such bonds so delivered for payment of such services or work 9 perfonned shall have been authorized and issued in the manner provided in this act and shall 10 otherwise confonn to the provisions hereof. II 12 Section 17. DISTRICT AUTHORITY TO PURCHASE OR PROCURE. Insofar as the exercise 13 of any power or authority granted by this act shall involve the purchase or procurement of 14 commodities or services, the board shall exercise such power in accordance with the purchasing 15 and procurement rules, regulations, ordinances, practices, and procedures of St. Lucie County as 16 the same may exist from time to time. The district shall requisition such commodities and 17 services through such purchasing agents as the county may from time to time appoint, and such 18 requisitions or contract may be issued or entered into in the name of St. Lucie County. The costs 19 of such purchases, procurements, and contract of the district shall be paid with funds of the 20 district. 21 22 Section 18. MAINTENANCE TAX. (I) In addition to the ad valorem taxes authorized to be 23 levied to pay the principal of and interest on bonds issued hereunder, the said district is 24 authorized to levy a special ad valorem maintenance tax of a sufficient number of mills upon the 25 dollar of assessed valuation of taxable property in the district to pay for the maintenance and 26 operation of such erosion prevention facilities and other corporate purposes of the said district. 27 However, such special maintenance tax shall in no event exceed I mill in any I year for Zone A, 28 eight-tenths of a mill in any I year for Zone B, six-tenths of a mill in any I year for Zone C, BflEI 29 four-tenths of a mill in any I year for Zone D, and 2 mills in any I vear for Zone E. Such special 30 maintenance tax shall be levied and collected in the manner provided herein for ad valorem taxes 18 '-' """" I levied and collected for debt service on bonds issued pursuant to this act and in accordance with 2 the provisions of section 8. 3 (2) Upon the effective date of this act, the district board shall be authorized to levy an ad valorem 4 maintenance tax within new, amended or consolidated zones established pursuant to section 8(4). 5 Such ad valorem maintenance tax millage rate within such zones shall be a rate determined by 6 the board to provide each zones' proportionate share of maintenance tax revenue. Such 7 proportionate share shall be the percentage benefit accruing to lands within such zones as 8 determined pursuant to section 8(4). Such taxes shall be levied and collected in the manner 9 provided within section 8. 10 II Section 19. DISTRICT CONTRACTS. Any contract entered into by the said district shall be 12 deemed to have been made for the benefit of any holders of bonds issued pursuant to this act to 13 the extent necessary, and the terms of any such contract shall be enforceable by such 14 bondholders in any appropriate legal proceeding. Any such contract if made with another public IS body or municipality may be enforceable without the requirement of formal consideration. 16 17 Section 20. REAL/PERSONAL PROPERTY; ADVANCEMENT OF FUNDS. The County of 18 St. Lucie, er any municipality, or other political subdivision is authorized to sell, lease, grant or 19 convey any real or personal property to the said district and any such sale, grant, lease or 20 conveyance may be made without formal consideration. The County of St. Lucie shall further 21 have the power to advance any moneys available to the district to pay any of the preliminary 22 expenses of the district, including engineering, legal, or financial services or any other purposes 23 necessary in the planning and beginning of construction or erosion prevention facilities 24 authorized by this act. However, all such moneys so advanced shall be repaid to the county from 25 the proceeds of any bonds issued pursuant to this act, or ttom ad valorem or maintenance taxes 26 levied in the said district for operation and maintenance of erosion prevention facilities and other 27 corporate purposes of the district. 28 29 Section 21. AUTHORITY TO DELEGATE. The district board shall have power to establish and 30 create such departments, boards, or other agencies as it shall deem necessary or desirable in the 31 performance of any acts or other things necessary in the exercise of the powers provided in this 19 "'" ""'" I act, and may delegate to such departments, boards, or other agencies such administrative duties 2 and other powers as may be deemed necessary and desirable in the exercise of the powers 3 provided in this act. However, the issuance of bonds, levy of taxes, and authorization of the 4 acquisition, construction, reconstruction, or improvement of erosion prevention facilities shall be 5 authorized by resolution or resolutions duly adopted by the district board. 6 7 Section 22. EXEMPTION FROM TAXATION. All district property shall be exempt from the 8 levy and sale by virtue of an execution and no execution or other judicial process shall issue 9 against such property, nor shall any judgment against the a district be a charge or lien on its 10 property or taxes or other revenue; provided that nothing herein contained shall apply to or limit II the rights of bondholders to pursue any remedy for the enforcement and collection of any taxes 12 pledged for any bonds issued hereunder. 13 14 Section 23. COVENANT NOT TO IMPAIR. The State of Florida does hereby pledge to and 15 covenant and agree with the holders of any bonds issued pursuant to this act, that it will not limit 16 or alter the rights hereby vested in said district to acquire, construct, reconstruct, improve, 17 maintain, and operate said erosion prevention facilities and to levy and collect ad valorem taxes 18 as provided herein, and to fulfill the terms of any agreement made with the holders of such bonds 19 or other obligations, and will not in any way impair the rights or remedies of such holders, and 20 will not modify in any way the exemptions from taxation provided for in this act, until all such 21 bonds, together with interest thereon, and with interest on any unpaid installments of interest, 22 and all costs and expenses in connection with any action or proceeding by or on behalf of such 23 holders, are fully met and discharged. 24 25 Section 24. The provisions of this act shall be liberally construed to effect its purposes and shall 26 be deemed cumulative, supplemental, and alternative authority for the exercise of the powers 27 provided herein. The exercise ofthe powers provided in this act and the issuance of bonds 28 hereunder shall not be subject to the limitations or provisions of any other law or laws except as 29 expressly provided herein. 30 20 "'" """ 1 Section 24 ~. SEVERABILITY. In case anyone or more of the sections or provisions of this 2 act, or the application of such sections or provisions to any situations, circumstances, or person, 3 shall for any reason be held to be unconstitutional or invalid, such unconstitutionality or 4 invalidity shall not affect any other sections or provisions of this act or the application of such 5 sections or provisions of this act or the application of such sections or provisions to any other 6 situation, circumstances, or person, and it is intended that this act shall be construed and applied 7 as if such section or provision so held unconstitutional or invalid had not been included in this 8 act. 9 10 I I Section 4. Chapters 67-2001 and 97-354, Laws of Florida, are hereby repealed. 12 13 Section 5. This act shall take effect upon becoming a law. 21 \w- ...." 4 ", ST. LUCIE COUNTY MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS JOHN D. BRUHN DISTRICT 1 DOUG COWARD DISTRICT 2 PAULA A. LEWIS FRANNIE HUTCHINSON CLIFF BARNES DISTRICT 3 DISTRICT 4 DISTRICT 5 AGENDA October 28, 2003 1. MINUTES Approve the minutes of the meeting held..October 14, 2003. ",,;2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMÉNT , . \. CONSENT AGENDA 1. WARRANTS LISTS . Appro~e Warrants Ust No. 55 through No. 56 Approve Warrant;'> UstNo. 3 through No.5 2. PURCHASING Bid Waiver and Piggyback Osceola County Bid AjR#03·368·BC Mosquito Control Chemical- Consider staff recommendation to approve the waiver of the bid process and grant permission to piggyback Osceola County Bid ,with Adapco, Inc. and Clarke Mosquito Control and authorize the. Chairman to sign the contracts as prepared by the County Attorney. NonCE: All proceedings before this Board areelectronicaJly recorded. Any person Yttlo decides 10 appeal any acUon taken by the Board at these meetings v,.;1I needa re::ord oflhe proceedings and lor such purpose may need to ensure thai a verbatim record of the proceedings Is made. Upon the request of any party to the proceedings, individuals testifying during a hearing will be sworn in. Any partylo the proceedings 'Nill begranled an ",portunity locross·examine any individuallestlf}'ing during a hearing upon request. Anyonewith acisabilify re:¡uiringaccommodatloo to attend this meeting should contact the 51. Lucie County Community Services Manager al (m) 462-1m Of TOO (772) 462-1428 at least forty-eight(48} hours prior to the meeting. ¡i -.-... - ~ ....., MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT ST. LUCIE COUNTY, FLORIDA REGULAR MEETING Date: October 14, 2003 Tape: I Convened: 10:55 a.m. Adjourned: 10:56 a.m. Commissioners Present: Chairman, John D. Bruhn, Paula A. Lewis, Cliff Barnes, Doug Coward, Frannie Hutchinson, absent Others Present: Doug Anderson, County Administrator, Ray Wazny, Asst. County Administrator, Dan Mcintyre, County Attorney, Don West, Public Works Director, Bill Blazak, Utilities Director, Mi11ie Delgado-Feliciano, Deputy Clerk 1. MINUTES It was moved by Com. Barnes, seconded by Com. Lewis, to approve the minutes of the meeting held September 23,2003 and September 18, 2003; and, upon roll call, motion carried unanimously. 2. GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENTS None 3. CONSENT AGENDA It was moved by Com. Lewis, seconded by Com. Coward, to approve the Consent Agenda; and, upon rol1 call, motion carried unanimously. 1. WARRANT LISTS The Board approved Warrant List Nos. 52 through 54. 2. MOSQUITO CONTROL A. Indian River License Plate Program FY 2003 Grant- The Board approved Equipment Request No. 04-203 for the purchase or rour 7,000 gpm electric pumps and Budget Amendment No. 04-100 budgeting $51,600 of grant funds for the purchase of the pumps. B. FIND GRANTlVitolo Park /Middle Cove pub1ie ADA Aecess- The Board approved Resolution No. 03-0ó budgeting the remaining FIND grant funds in the amount of $7,:146 to complete the additional fishing pier lor the parle C. FIND GRANT ACCEPTANCE- The Board approve Resolution No. 03-08 budgeting the grant funds in the amount of $50,000 to construct public access improvements Îor Blind Creek Park, authorize the Chairman to execute the agreement and approved the Interloeal Agreement with St. Lucie County. D. USDA Grant Acceptance- The Board approved Resolution No. 03-07 budgeting the grant funds in the amount of $260,300 to implement restoration activities at the Indrio Buffer site and approved the Inter1oca] Agreement with St. Lucie County. '" ---,. "-" ...., There being no further business to be brought before the Board, the meeting was adjourned. Chairman Clerk of Circuit Court 10/15/03 F''7./illWARR "-" ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD """ PAGE WARRANT LIST #55- 09-0CT-2003 TO 15-0CT-2003 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO FUND ,TITLE EXPENSES PAYROLL 145 'Mosqui to Fund 56,705.30 0.00 GRAND TOTAL: 56,705.30 0.00 of!O/~\ " , .... , \ '. . iIitw" 10/10/03 ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD FZABWARR ..., WARRANT LIST # 3- 04-0CT-2003 TO 10-0CT-2003 FUND S~~lliRY- MOSQUITO FUND TITLE 145 Mosquito Fund GRAND TOTAL: EXPENSES 12,757.69 12,757.69 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 8,290.37 8,290.37 '-!r 10/17/03 F7.ABWARR FUND TITLE ST. LUCIE COUNTY - BOARD ...." WARRANT LIST # 4- 11-0CT-2003 TO 17-0CT-2003 FUND SUMMARY- MOSQUITO 145 Mosquito Fund GRAND TOTAL: -~ . EXPENSES 16,516.32 16,516.32 PAGE 1 PAYROLL 0.00 0.00 ,. " v ,..., ITEM NO. C2 DATE: 10/28/03 AGENDA REQUEST REGULAR () PUBLIC HEARING ( ) CONSENT (X) TO: MOSQUITO CONTROL DISTRICT BOARD PRESENTED BY: SUBMITTED BY (DEPT): Purchasinq Ed Parker, Purchasinq Director SUBJECT: Bid Waiver and Piggyback Osceola County Bid NR#03-368-BC Mosquito Control Chemical. BACKGROUND: On September 29, 2003 Osceola County awarded Bid NR#03-368-BC Mosquito Control Chemical to Adapco, Inc. and Clarke Mosquito Control for Mosquito Control Chemical. In accordance with Section 5.7 County Purchasing Manual, the Mosquito Control Department staff requests a waiver of the bid process and approval to contract with Adapco, Inc. and Clarke Mosquito Control. FUNDS AVAILABLE: Account #145-6230-5522>00-600 - Mosquito Control, Chemicals. PREVIOUS ACTION: N/A RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Board approve the waiver of the bid process and permission to piggyback Osceola County Bid NR#03-368 with Adapco, Inc. and Clarke Mosquito Control and authorization for the Chairman to sign the contracts as prepared by the County Attorney. COMMISSION ACTION: }C¡ APPROVED [] DENIED [ ] OTHER: CONCURRENCE: Approved (4·0) Bruhn·Absent ~ County Atlorney;(X) '\~ ri-"- PS" Originating Oept: Coordination/So j" .' I Purchasing Mgr,;(X) ¡/¡íI / Other: Finance: (Check for Copy only. jf Applicable) "" 'wi ~I ~! ~IJn I ~ ~ ~ CD ao ~ ao ~ OJ '" " W N ~ 0 ::u '!to 0 w CD '" '" '" ~ ~, ~ ~ N ~, " ~ ~,,~ ~ ¿, 0 0 ~O '" ao ", 0 OJ ao , 'E' c. C. '0 Q-..... Q- c. _, Q- c. c. 0.1 c...;..... Q- c. _. to OJ 2 2 'E' 2 c" 2 ~ 2 2 ~ ~ ~ () '" ~ '" ~ ~ <: <: <: <: <:", ~ 3 3, 3'" 3 3'" 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 I '" 'U-u '" 'U-u '" -u 'U '0 'U-u '", -u'U s: s: s: s:,s:'" s: "'''':t>:t>:t>:t>:t>:t>:t> r- () ~ " '" '" " '" '" !1. '" '" ê.: ~ ~' " '" '" o o!o 0 0 ª= S' % ~-ê ~ ;¿ ;¿ ;¿ ;¿ ;¿, 0 ::T =~ :3 53 :3 0 ~ :3 =~ ~ CD ;0 0 3 3 3 3' o 3 3 jg jg~ 15 jg 0 CD (t 0 w =: =: =: =: =: =':,-1 .. :J " " :J " " :J " " " " ~ w wee c c c ~ ~ x ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N'NI- ª. 0 -':J :JI c.:J :J c.:J :J :J ~ ..... ::I :::;¡ ::"::' ;::;.: ;::;.: ;::;.: a. - - a.;o 0 0 0 + + + " '" <: 0 0 2 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 ~ 2 rn +,+ + NIN N @ .. w '" :J :J :J :J <: :J :J :J :J :Þ 3 3 ::J::I~5:~Š::.s:: -,01 -.................. -'" '" '" '" @. '" @. '" '" m~,_._._._._3~~350oo~~~ C N In co - w(ñ ~(f) W(f) W (f) ~øaaaaa 2~, ~~~~«< c: '?' 0, 0,< ~'< ~'< ~'< I~- - OOO 'õ CD010é.n~·- ~ >'::J ' :J ' :J ' :J ~ S' o '" OJ", OJ", OJ "" ~CD~~::J::I::J <::I ª~~ ,U1W~, m<i3 OJ~ OJ~ OJ~ Ct.I~ 0 O,m CD m 00. m ~~'§¡CJ10(] 1 ¡:¡ ;;: 0<9. o CQ. 0<9. () ëif ~ '" ~ '" ~ In !;¡¡rC'CCCc, ~2 ~õ"!O,=l.ßrg,cc 51 0 ~ 2.1 ",,,, ",,,, ",,,, OJ CD r r r r r 03 -. ::I :J ,0 = = ~ In -. C. -. C. -. C. -.0.-««<...... :J ::J 010- Z .0 ~æ o -U o ' 0 01:)1----- g.,D:) s:::'~Q_'ë·:Ji::Jg G) ~ ª. '" 3 'U 3 3CDU1~U1W,N CD~ -,cccca.a...... () ;;: -. '" [ ~·......0U1U10~ X~ x33 ............c 0 ~ :3 In ~ ::t: ~3 -3 -3cc coco ...... ~ CCca () 0"'1 w '" w'" wroO)ccCl)Q)cc 00;::;.: 33 m 0 m- ~ - ~ - ......_=Q¿==~ =?< ::r ;;: " ()2: ' ::T , ::T I:::TO'-OO- -_ OJ -. OJ -. 0>5':::10:::1:::10 ID ¡:¡ - . " .CD .:J OJ." ~ ()). ::J ::I < :Þ ~ N - Q- Q- c' » '" r- ~<:", (f) 3 3 '" N OJ :; ~ N 'U OJ '" r " '" '" '" , I , ~ '" 0 Q, '" '" '" '" -ER-E:fi-{l)~;-Eß-Eß W "'16' ~ 6' ~ a. .-Þ-,ª-¡ I\.) ª- wi "I'" OJ '" "'I 8 '" ~,~I -'~~:~Î~~' I I ¡ ~I '" N o o '" o , I I N N "0 o o '" o¡ CD o o '" o ,I, '" -i o :;! r- '" '" o o '" o '" '" OJ, ~I ' 1 I I" i , , I I i' (/)1 () () iii ~ ,.. CD ;;: o In .0 ". Õ () o " - ~ ~ o (f) () m o r- :Þ () o c Z -i -< ~ o -i :Þ OJ C r- ~ o z c: " ,,' .. ~ c: (f) :I> <: ?Z o w W '" OJ , CD () '1J rn '" ro '" "- w \or "'WI co '" '" wi", '" w '"" '" "', ... ~, ~ '" o '" '" o '" '" '" o ~ ~ ~ '" ... 0- <:: " '" æ. c. ~ <:: 3 crr~Q rn OJ ~ro »>~' ~~ ~~ ~~ ~·~w ~ 9; 2 0 :::!; e :::! CD:::! ð g 1;7 0 2 ~ 2 ~ ' ~ '<",-' ,ce '<",~ 8 "'",xc;;;3ë: .....\."'" (fJ (fJ-:E.!-I 3(1) 3(1) c: CD ; OJ .þ.. u) =r G) -. ro ([ N :::1:::1:::1:::1 ca -00 :::I ~ ~@, .þ..~ QN~ g g g, g( ) ~, g' 3 rn ~ ~ ~ ~ ~:~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q3 ; ~ -:UJ c-cn &~G)~~' ~ ~ ~ ~~ ê B' g:¡ 0 ~ I~ ~ (1) J\.) ~ ñ ~ 0 Q 0 = ã) C ..õ" c;: (") 0 cr U1 ~(J) 6 .., .., g ~ ~ C crff' g ~.crN- ~ ~ ~ ~ Q r ~ œcr, cr~' NZ '< '< '< '<~ r Q) 5/J caW ~ ÆgcrG'> g g g gc ~ ~.....\, n ø ~,CCi~'Q -I ~ ~ ~' ~3 õ' ~:5 G) Q.þ.: ,"-' m 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ë: 51' ~ ~ }> g 3:, ~ Cf' Cf <{1 '?' wCD g: c ,Y ..c cr ñ ï ()1 !J1! U'1 CJ'1 ~CCCD ~ ~.6' ~ cg ~ ~ 0, ~ ,:,,"~.:+L,:t1J.JÚ.uWljlJijJJ~ y,.(;A ~ I Y, ~ (") cr '-. 0> 0> <:: g;c.ccc c. ~ <:: 3 c. ~ <:: 3 0- 0> <C 0- o x 0- 0> <C 'C ~ wi ;Þ .D I~' ",0> w" :.. o ;Þ .D <:: 0> 0- 0> " " '< iii :J o :J '" " '< w3 . 0 '" :J 8,Cf , <=> o w '" o :.. o '" '" o O¡ o ~, '" o '" ~ '" o '" w '" '" '" '" w '" '" '" '" w ~I~I ~ ~ 0'"" '¡:' <C c. ~ <:: 3 C :J - :C' '" ^ .. :J ~ Q¡ W C '" Q) '" Q) '" 0 ;Þ <=> :.. 0 0 , .~------L- '" w y, y, iR: ... '" '" '" "',"'I 1 I ",I I I , , ~ ~ I I Q) w' w' 00 I '" "0 0: w '" co 0 0 '" ... 0 0, 0' 0 00 <=> 01 ' I :.. :.., 0 0 0 0 0 '" !D R: ~ ~ o OJ ¿, '" 00 to .0 ;s: o en .D 5. Õ o o :J - ~ 2. 5' r o (fJ () m o r ;Þ () o c z -; -< CD 6 ;¡! CD C r ~ o z o .. ~ ^ CD ;s: o en .D <:: ;; o o o :J - ~ 2. '" ~ ;u 'It o '" , '" OJ CJ) Co () '1J w <0 ø w Q, w r~[:wz o ::J'" en '#. 0 ~Cij"~O-~ ~ ; CD æ=1~Q'~ 3 Q. CD "'0 CIJ (1)< m w ::IË (þ' Qoffiê:m 0)'00 0 :::J :::E :::J @ ~-ga. a. -a êr.ï 00" _ '" 0 (I) c: ~ a. ~Im~~z ('[) N < ......9- Q.I' CD ~ ~ ~:g:¡ 5. Ci) a. Q) 0 C,.I ::;- 5..:-" '£ cr ~r.n lJ' CD ë: ° ~13 Q) :::J C'" œ CD !~ ë: CD Do) :::T "'0 ,cr I (") CDQ)ICJ: (j -o';:;"¡!::J CD ..... ....:e.. "'S.::5. 'Q en ill' Q) C'" 9:1 ~ ,"'0 ä.: CDI-1::r . IcrJ I I i I '" '0 -u :::raCD ¡:g c..t=! :; f¡ CD ~;:!. =ßJ :;¡<.Q (I) (I) Õ'9: ~ '" -." ¡þo 3 §, '" - :;¡ ° 9.~ '" ëii '00. ~ ° 3;::; (I) 0- 0. '" ' Ow :;¡ :;¡ '0 " ~ (I) õ' 0 (I) - "-' I~ o z=i '" Om . :<: w ¡" o (fJ () m o s;: () o c Z -I -< OJ o :¡;! OJ C r ~ Õ z N '" o .þ. 0- '" <.Q ,,' <.Q D:! ë: < (I) Sl Q. (I) x (), G) .þ. o ¡j' 0- '" <.Q d -{ ~ r- " o ;:a r- o -{ x< -1(1) rSl -. ° -go- -. '" 0." r- ~ '" N < ~ r¡ en c.:C (1).0 . c: Nc.: "'r- <.Q '" 9« 06" :::J ë: c: (I) <.Q Q o~ ::I';:a CD .. 30 õ' (.oJ '" ¿, üifJ m ,0 ;;: o '" .0 c: ;:;: o o o :;¡ - ~ Q. :;- ;> o "" o o ~I \1 ! ~< ~'" ct> I'" , ~ õ "1;,,;;;0- kiD.) ,,,0 ¡(ø:¡;N c..n ¡~~!, (XI '214ll:' ~ '" ¡,,~¡¡,'_):;:VJ c..n "'~ '" l~ '~fÎ N CD~ w ?~f ~ .þ,1!;!îj, 0 o~ a o ¡¡; ~ "" CD ;;: o "' .c E. Õ o o =- ~ Q. ¡~ '" c " ., '" ~ c en ~ "'''' '" o "" o CoO N èo .þ, 10 I~ '-' ~ Bid No, NR#03-368·BC Due Date: September 16, 2003 @2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31, 2003 a.m. Buyer: Barb Carter Respond to: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq., Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar5®osceola.org FL 34741 Phone: 407/343·3132 Fax: 407/343·3130 Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals II Invitation to Bid Osceola County Board of County Commissioners Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals Bid Number: A/R#03-368-BC Requesting Department: Mosquito Control Bid Contact: Barb Carter, Procurement Services Bid Due Date: Tuesday, September 16,2003 Bid Time Due: 2:00 p.m. Locai Time Location to Deliver Bid: Procurement Services Office, 1 Courthouse Square, Suite 1200, Kissimmee, FL 34741 In accordance with the intent and content of this Invitation to Bid (ITB), we the undersigned do hereby offer to perform as stipulated in this response. Failure to do so may result in the forfeiting of bid security, removal from the County's bidder list, or other remedies available to the County under the laws of the State of Florida. Legal Name of Bidder: Business Address: Phone Number: I Fax Number: E-Mail Address: Osceola County Occupational License Number: Contractor's Florida License Number (as applicable): Authorized Signature (manual): Date: Printed Signature: Title: Genera/Instructions/Declarations 1. Bids will be opened and publicly read aloud by a representative of the Procurement Office in the Procurement Conference Room (1 Courthouse Square, Suite 1200, Kissimmee, FL) on the appropriate date and time as shown above. All bid openings are open to the public. Interested parties are welcomed to attend the bid openings. 2. Bids must be SUBMITTED ON THE FORM FURNISHED BY THE COUNTY and in accordance with specifications and list of quantities desired. 3. Page One must be completed and submitted as the top sheet of your bid response, 4. It is the intent and purpose of Osceola County that this Invitation to Bid promotes competitive bidding. It shall be the bidder's responsibility to advise the Procurement Services Office at the address noted above, if any language, requirements, etc., or any combination thereof, inadvertently restricts or limits the requirements stated in this Invitation to Bid to a single source. Such notification must be submitted in writing and must be received by the Procurement Services Office not later than seven (7) calendar days prior to the bid closing date, SECTION A INSTRUCTIONS TO BIDDER Page 1 of 16 "'" >.,J Bid No, AIR#03·368·BC Due Date: September 16, 2003 @ 2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31, 2003 p,m. Buyer: Barb Carter Respond to: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq., Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar5®osceola,orq FL 34741 Phone: 407/343·3132 Fax: 407/343·3130 Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals A1. Bid Price Sheet: Each bidder shall furnish the information required on the Bid Price Schedule, Section F, and each accompanying sheet thereof on which he makes an entry. Offers submitted on any other format may be disqualified. A2. Bid Submittal: All bids must be submitted in a sealed envelope, piainly marked on the oulside with the invitation to bid number, vendor's name and date and time of opening. A3. Bid Copies: All bids must be submitted in Triplicate; one (1) oriqinal and two (2) copies, This includes specifically the bid cover page, any section on which annotations are required or exceptions are taken, lhe Bid Schedule, and any supporting documentation or literature being submitted with your bid, A4. It is the bidder's responsibility to assure that Bids are received in the Osceola County Procurement Services Office, 1 Courthouse Square, Suite 1200, Kissimmee, FL 34741, not later than 2:00 P.M., on the date indicated. Any received after this date and time will not be accepted or considered, and will be returned unopened to the bidder. No teleqraphic or facsimile offers will be considered, No offers will be accepted or received in anv other Osceola Countv office. AS. Bids will be publicly opened and read aloud in the PROCUREMENT CONFERENCE ROOM on the above appointed date at 2:00 P.M. or as soon as possible thereafter. A6. Bids may not be withdrawn for a period of ninety (90) days after the bid opening date. However, bids may be wilhdrawn anytime before the bid opening. A bidder may withdraw his bid without prejudice to himself, not later than the day and hour set for opening of bids, by communicating his purpose in writing to the County and his bid will be returned to him unopened. A7. Bidders' attention is specifically called to the terms and conditions of this solicitation. As witnessed by your signature on the cover page and the proposal page(s) bidders, without exception, will be solely responsible for all aspects of the terms, conditions and special provisions of this solicitation. AS. Unit Price Accuracy: Please check your unit prices before submitling your bid, as no change in prices will be allowed after the opening. All prices and notations must be in ink or typewritlen. In cases of the extended price irregularities, unit pricing will prevail. Please note that the Counly reserves the right to clarify and correct blatant unit price or extended amount errors, A9. Proper Signatures: Failure to sign and witness your signature may result in a disqualification of your bid. Please be sure your bid is signed, sealed and properly witnessed. A10. All items bid must be in total compliance with specifications. Alternale bids will not be considered unless they are specifically called for in this solicitation. A 11. Bidders are advised that the County will not accept limitations on liability, The successful Bidder will be fully liable for all damages and events caused by them without any limitations as to dollar amount. The County will pursue liable Bidders to the extent allowed by law. Any bid received that limits liability to the amount of the bid or the resulting contract will be considered unresponsive and the bidder non-responsible and as such, the bid will not be accepted by the County, A12. Protests: The Counly abides by the parameters set forth in Florida Statutes (Chapter 120) relative to the consideration and addressing of valid bid protests. Any actual or prospective bidder who protests the reasonableness, award recommendation, necessity or competitiveness of the terms and/or conditions of lhe invitation to bid, selection or award recommendation shall file such protesl in writing with the Procurement Services Director within three (3) business days after Board action/award. A 13. Questions: Questions relative to interprelation of specifications or any aspect of the solicitation process, Page 2 of 16 "" ...J Bid No. AlR#03·368·BC Due Date: September 16, 2003@ 2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31, 2003 p.m. Buyer: Barb Carter Respond to: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq., Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar5®osceola.orn FL 34741 Phone: 407/343·3132 Fax: 407/343·3130 Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals shall be addressed to the Procurement Representative, in writing, at least seven (7) calendar days before the bid opening date. Any interpretations, clarifications or changes made will be in the form of written addenda issued by the Procurement Services Department. Oral answers by any member of the Procurement Services Department or requesting department will not be authoritative and the County will not enlertain any protests based on a verbal instruction. A14. It will be the responsibility of the bidder to contact the Procurement Services Department prior to submitting a bid to ascertain if any addenda have been issued, to obtain all such addenda, and to return executed addenda with their bid. The County will not consider requests to reopen a bid as a result of the failure of the bidder to secure addenda. A15. Bidders are requested to refrain from contacting the requesting/evaluating Departments or Divisions during the bid process. ANY QUESTIONS FROM 81DDERS OR EVALUATING DEPARTMENTS/DIVISIONS MUST BE ADDRESSED TO THE PROCUREMENT SERVICES DEPARTMENT. A16. Failure to comply with any of the foregoing instruction or any other essenlial element of this bid may result in disqualification of your bid. SECTION 8 GENERAL PROVISIONS 81. Receiving/Payment/Invoicing: No payment will be made for materials ordered without proper purchase order authorization. Osceola County shall pay all vendors pursuant to and in accordance wilh the promulgations set forth by the State of Florida's Prompt Payment Act (Florida Statutes Section 218,70). Payment shall not be made until materials, goods or services, have been received, inspected and accepted by the County in the quality and quantily ordered. Payment will be accomplished by submission of invoice, in duplicate, with Purchase Order Number referenced thereon and mailed to the address set forth in the Purchase Order. Payment in advance of receipt of goods or services by Osceola County cannot be made. 82. Fund Availability: Any contract resulting from this solicitation is deemed effective only to the extent that appropriations are available, Pursuant to Florida Statutes all appropriations lapse at the end of the Fiscal Year. Multi·year awards shall be adequately funded but the County reserves the right not to appropriate for an ongoing procurement if it is deemed in its best interest. 83. Occupational License: If awarded bid, the Tax Collector of Osceola County requires an Osceola County Occupational License. Please contact the Tax COllector/Occupational Licenses Office directly at 407-343- 4000, for information concerning this requirement. In accordance with Florida Slate Statute 205.065, a current Department of Professional Regulation certificate may be provided in lieu of an Osceola County Occupational License, with a copy of the Occupational License of home state/counly/city, 84. Permits/Licenses/Fees: Any permits, licenses or fees required will be the responsibility of the contractor. 85, Taxes: Osceola County does not pay Federal Excise nor State Sales taxes, Osceola County's tax exemption number is 59-00-01 0372-53C. Federal Exemption ID No. 59·6000780. 86. Independent Pricing: By submission of this bid, the bidder certifies, and in the case of a joint bid each party thereto certifies as 10 its own organization, that in connection with this procurement: (a) The prices in this bid have been arrived at independently, without consultation, communication, collusion or agreement for the purpose of restricting competition, as to any matter relating to such prices with any other offeror or with any competitor, (b) Unless othelWise required by law, the prices which have been quoted in this bid have not been knowingly disclosed by the bidder and will not knowingly be disclosed by the bidder prior to opening, directly or indirectly to any offeror or to any competitor; and (c) No attempt has been made or will be made by the bidder to induce any other person or firm to Page 3 of 16 '-' .., Bid No, AlR#03·368·BC Due Date: September 16, 2003@ 2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31, 2003 D.m, BUye~:carb Carter Respond to: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq., Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar5 osceola,orn FL 34741 Phone: 407/343·3132 Fax: 407/343-3130 Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals submit or not to submit a bid for lhe purpose of restricting competition. B7. Inspection/Acceptance Title: Inspection and acceptance will be al destination unless otherwise stipulated. Title and risk of loss or damage to all items shall be the responsibility of the shipper (vendor) until accepted by the using department of Osceola County, unless loss or damage results from negligence by Osceola County or its using Department. B8. The Contract: Notice of an award by Osceola County will conslitute acceptance of lhe Bid from the overall lowest priced, most responsive and responsible bidder. The Bid package signed by the successful bidder along with documentation included in the bidder's submittal as required by this Invitation to Bid and other additional materials submitted by lhe bidder and accepted by the County shall constitule the contract. A purchase order andlor other award document will be issued by the County when appropriate to do so. B9. Laws Governing this Contract: Any contractual arrangement between Osceola County and the vendor shall be consistenl with, and be governed by, the ordinances of Osceola County, the whole law of lhe State of Florida, both procedural and substantive, and applicable federal statutes, rules and regulations. Any and all litigation arising under any contractual arrangement shall be brought in the appropriate court in Osceola County, Florida. B10. Conflict of Interest: All offerors must disclose with their offer the name of any officer, director, or agent who is also an officer or employee of Osceola County. Further, all bidders must disclose the name of any Osceola County officer or employee who owns, directly or indirectly an interest of ten (10%) percent or more of the bidder's firm or any of its branches. Failure to disclose in this manner will result in disqualification of your bid or cancellation of work. The County will seek damages for recoupment of losses in having to re-bid or re- assign. B11. Additional Terms and Conditions: No additional terms and conditions included with the bid response shall be evaluated or considered and any and all such additional terms and conditions shall have no force and effect and are inapplicable to this bid. If submitted either purposely through intent or design or inadvertently appearing separately in transmitting letters, specifications, literature, price lists, or warranties it is understood and agreed the general and special conditions in this solicitation are the only conditions applicable to this bid and the bidders authorized affixed to the bid signature section attests to this. B12. Changes: Osceola County reserves the right to order, in writing, changes in the work within the scope of the conlract such as change in quantity or delivery schedule, The contractor has the right to request an equitable price adjustment in cases where changes to the contract under the authority of this clause result in increased costs to the contractor. B13. Modifications: In addition to modifications made under the changes clause, any contract resulting from lhis solicitation may be modified within the scope of the contract upon the written and mutual consent of both parties, and approval by appropriate legal bodies in Osceola County, B14. Assignment & Subcontracting: The vendor will not be permitted to assign its contract with Osceola County, or to subcontract any of the work requirements to be performed without obtaining prior written approval of Osceola County. B15. Liability: The vendor shall act as an independent contraclor and not as an employee of Osceola County, The vendor will be required to indemnify, defend, and hold and save harmless Osceola County, its officers, agenls, and employees, from damages arising from the vendor's performance of, or failure to perform, any task or duty required 10 be performed by the vendor. B16. Termination for Default: The performance of the Agreement may be terminated by Osceola County in accordance wilh this clause, in whole or in part, in writing, whenever the County shall determine that the contractor has failed to meel performance requirement(s) of the Agreement. Page 4 of 16 '- ...., Bid No. AlR#03·368·BC Due Date: September 16, 2003 @ 2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31, 2003 o.m. Buyer: Barb Carter Respond to: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq., Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar5®osceola,oro FL 34741 Phone: 407/343·3132 Fax: 407/343·3130 Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals 617. Termination for Convenience: Osceola County reserves the right to terminate the Agreement in whole or part by giving the vendor written notice at least thirty (30) days prior to the effective date of the termination. Upon receipt of termination from Osceola County, the vendor shall only provide those services specifically approved or directed by Osceola County. All other rights and duties of the parties under the Agreement shall continue during such notice period, and Osceola County shall continue to be responsible to the vendor for the payment of any obligations to the extent such responsibility has not been excused by breach of default of the vendor. Upon termination, vendor shall bill Osceola County for all amounts not previously billed and due lhe vendor at that time. The vendor shall not be entitled to a professional fee nor expenses for any work commenced or expenses incurred after the notice of termination was received by the vendor, uniess specifically approved or requested by Osceola County. The vendor shall, however, be entitied to payment for services commenced and approved by Osceola County prior to the receipt of notice, or with the express written consent of Osceola County, prior to the effective date of termination. 618. 6id as Public Domain: All documents and other materials made or received in conjunction with this project will be subject to public disclosure requirements of Chapter 119, Florida Statutes. The bid will become part of the public domain upon opening, Vendors shall not submit pages marked "proprietary" or otherwise restricted. 619. Force Majeure: Neither party to this agreement shall be liable to the other for any cost or damages if the failure to perform the agreement arises out of causes beyond the control and without the fault or negligence of the parties. Such causes may include, but are not restricted to, acts of God, fires, quarantine restriction, strikes and freight embargoes. in all cases, the failure to perform must be totally beyond the control and without any fault or negligence of the party. 620. Indemnification: The successful proposer(s) agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the County from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, or causes of action, including, but not limited to, any and all costs, expenses, legal fees and liabilities incurred in and about the Investigation and defense thereof, for personal injuries, including death or property damage suffered by any person, firm or corporation whatsoever and arising from or in any way connected with the negligent acts, negligent performance of the Agreement, willful misconduct, violation of law or breach of this Agreement by the successful proposer(s), their agent(s), servant(s), or employees under this Agreement. The County agrees to hold harmless and indemnify the successful proposer(s) from and against any and all claims, demands, actions, or causes of action, including, but not limited to, any and all costs, expenses, legal fees and liabilities incurred in and about the investigation and defense thereof, for personal injuries, including death or property damage suffered by any person, firm or corporation whatsoever and arising from or in any way connected with the negligent acts of the County, its agents, servants or employees in assisting the successful proposer(s) in the performance of their obligations under this Agreement. 621. Public Entities Crimes: A person or affiliate who has been placed on the convicted vendor list following a conviction for public entity crime may not submit a bid on a contract to provide any goods or services to a public enlily, may not submit a bid on a contract with a public entity for the construction or repair of a public building or public work, may not submil bids on leases of real property to public entity, may not be awarded or perform work as a contractor, supplier, subcontractor, or consultant under a contract with any public entity, and may not transact business with any public entity in excess of the threshold amount provided in Florida State Statutes, Section 287.017, for CATEGORY TWO for a period of 36 months from the date of being placed on the convicted vendor list. By signature on this solicitation, vendor certifies that they are qualified to do business wilh Osceola County in accordance with Florida State Statute, 622. Debarred Vendors: The County reserves the right to withhold award, rescind award or forego award to any vendor or contractor who is found to have been debarred from doing business wilh the Stale of Florida or Page 5 of 16 '-' ~ Bid No. NR#03-368·BC Due Date: September 16, 2003 @ 2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31,2003 o.m, Buyer: Barb Carter Respond to: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq., Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar5fa)osceoia,ora FL 34741 Phone: 407/343·3132 Fax: 407/343·3130 Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals any other public entity. It shall be County's soie determination as to the desirability of contracting with a contractor or vendor who has been debarred from doing business with any pubilc entity. B23. Contractor Responsibilities: The Contractor certifies, by submission of this bid, that the Contractor will provide the services agreed upon in a timely and professional manner in accordance wilh specifications. B24. Equal Opportunity: Osceola County recognizes fair and open competition as a basic tenet of public procurement and encourages participation by minority and women owned business enterprises. The County requests minority and women owned business enterprises to submit evidence of such certification with submittals. B25. Other Entity Use: All Bidders/Proposer submitting a response to this Invitation to Bid agree that such response also constitules a bid to all governmental agencies, under the same conditions, for the same conlract price, and for the same effective period as this bid, should the Bidder feel it is in their best interest 10 do so. Each governmental agency desiring to accept these bids, and make an award thereof, shall do so independenlly of any other governmental agency. Each agency shall be responsible for its own purchases and each shall be liable only for materials and/or services ordered and received by it, and no agency assumes any liability by virtue of this bid/proposal. This agreement in no way restricts or inlerferes with the right of any governmentai agency to rebid any or all items. B26. Public Emergencies: It is hereby made a part of this bid that before, during, and after a public emergency, disaster, hurricane, tornado, flood, or other acts of God that Osceola County shall require a "First Priority" for goods and services. it is vital and imperative that the majority of citizens are protected from any emergency situation that threatens public health and safety, as determined by the County. Vendor/contractor agrees to rent/seil/lease all goods and services to the County or governmental entities on a "first priority" basis. The County expects 10 pay a fair and reasonable price for all products and services rendered or contracted in the event of a disasler, emergency, hurricane, tornado or other acts of God. SECTION C SPECIAL PROVISIONS C1. Minimum Standard: Specifications listed herein describe the expected minimum standard. If any exceptions are laken, indicate on the bid form any deviations from the specifications and include explanation of exception and applicable literature for evaluation purposes. The absence of this indicalion shall be considered complete compliance with the listed specifications. These specifications are inlended to be descriptive in nature and are not intended to eliminate any vendor from submitting a bid. C2. Bidder's Specifications: Each bidder shall make accurate statements in his bid, particularly as to types of producls provided and any special requirements or oplions required for operation. C3. Not Bidding: if not bidding any or all items, please so state. C4. Firm Prices: Unit Prices for goods and/or services covered in the specifications shall be firm, net delivered to the ordering agency, F.O.S. DESTINATION (vendor paying all deiivery costs) and shall remain firm for the period of any agreement reached as a resuit of this Annual Requirement. C5. Period of Agreement: Agreement shall be awarded for a one (1) year term 10 begin upon approval and execution of the County. C6. Option to Extend/Renew: The performance period of any contract or purchase order resulting from this invilation 10 bid may be extended upon mutual agreement between the vendor and Osceola County with no Page 6 of 16 \w ...", Bid No. NR#03·368·BC Due Date: September 16, 2003@2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31, 2003 p.m. Buyer: Barb Carter Respond to: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq., Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar5@osceola.ora FL 34741 Phone: 407/343·3132 Fax: 407/343·3130 Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals change in terms or conditions. Any extension of performance period under this provision shall be in one (1) year increments. Total contract length, including individual one (1) year extensions shall be in the County's best interest and sole discretion. Any agreement or amendment to the agreement resulting from this solicitation shall be subject to fund availability and mutual written agreement between the County and the successful bidder. C7. Exercise of Option: Exercise of option to extend term of contract: If the County wishes to enter into an option period, the County shall request from the contractor their written statement of desire to enter into an extension of the performance period. C8. Acceptance of Goods/Services: Receipt of goods/services shall not constitute acceptance. Final acceplance and authorization of payment shall be given only after a thorough inspection indicates that the product/performance meets bid specifications and conditions. Should the products/services differ in any respect from specifications, payment will be withheld until such time as the supplier takes necessary corrective action. If the proposed corrective action is not acceptable to the agency, the Procurement Services Office may authorize the recipient to refuse final acceptance of the goods/ services. Should a representative of Osceola County agree to accept the goods/services on condition that the contractor will correct his performance within a stipulated time period, then payment will be withheld until the services are performed as specified, C9. Supervision: The County shall not exercise any supervision or control over the Bidder's employees performing services under this contract. Such employees shall be accountable not to the County, but solely to the Bidder, who in turn is responsible to the County. C10. Pre-award Inspection: The County reserves the right to make a pre-award inspection of the bidder's facilities, to determine the capabilities of the bidder to service the County, prior to award of any agreement. C11. Existing Permits and Identification Numbers: Any permits and/or Department of Environmental Protection identification numbers are to be available for review upon request. C12. Estimated Quantities: Quantities noted in the Invitation to Bid are estimates only for bidding purposes and in no way obligates Osceola County to purchase this amount. This estimate is intended as a tool in evaluating bid responses only. The actual quantities purchased under this bid may be more or may be less. C13. Estimated Dollar Amount: The estimated dollar amount to be expended during this bid period of twelve (12) months is $280,000. Please note that this is an estimate only and in no way obligates the County to purchase this amount. This estimate is intended as a guide in submitting your bid. The actual quantities purchased under this bid may be more or may be less. C14. New Product: Any and all products provided under this bid shall be new and unused. C15. Inadequate Service: In cases where services are not properly delivered, the contractor will either remedy the defect or be responsible for reimbursement of the difference to the County for the contractor selected to remedy the defect. Acceptance of materials or service shall remain the county's sole discretion. C16. Additional Information: The Osceola County Procuremenl Office reserves the right to request any additional information needed for clarification from any bidder/proposer for evaluation purposes. C17. Attachments: All attachments are made an essential part of this bid. Attachment A - Statement of No Bid Attachment B - Drug Free Workplace Attachment C - Experience of Bidder NOTE: If you choose not to bid on this Invitation to Bid, please complete and return Attachment A. Page 7 of 16 "- ...., Bid No, AlR#03·368·BC Due Date: September 16, 2003 @ 2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31, 2003 p.m. Buyer: Barb Carter Respond tp: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq., Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar5@osceola,orq FL34741 Phone: 407/343-3132 Fax: 407/343·3130 Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Controi Chemicals C18. Probationary Period: The first ninety (90) days of the contracl are to be considered a "probationary" period. At the County's election, the successful bidder's contract may be terminated, based on the performance of the contractor, and a new award wiii be granted without another formal bid. C19. Experience of Bidder: Bidder must be currently doing business with the general public, currentiy servicing a minimum of three (3) commercial accounts equal in size and scope to this project, and be properly licensed to do business in the State of Florida. C20. Capability and References: Bidders shaii provide, with their bids, substantial material suitable for evaluating the ability of the potential Bidder to execute a project of this type. This includes references for the company (Attachment C). Aii reference materiais provided becomes the property of Osceola County, and aiso becomes public record. C21. Descriptive Literature: Each bidder shaii provide descriptive literature and manufacturer's specifications with their submittal. Descriptive literature must be sufficiently detaiied to aiiow for informed evaluation of bid. SECTION D AWARD OR REJECTION OF BIDS D1. Award of Contract/Purchase Order: Award will be made to the responsibie bidder most responsive to the solicitation. This bid may be awarded to a primary and aiternate vendor(s). The primary vendor shail always be contacted first for aii orders under this bid. If, at any time during the contract, the primary vendor cannot fulfili any given order they must contact the appropriate Osceola County representative immediately. Each order shaii be filled by the primary vendor unless the County is notified otherwise. If any given order cannot be filled within the time constraints by the primary vendor, ONLY then shaii the alternate vendor be contacted to fiii the order. Regardless of which vendor fiiis the order, the respective prices, as bid, shaii apply throughout the term of the contract. D2. Split Award: Osceola County reserves the right to make award to one vendor, to split the award between vendors, or to not award some or all items, depending on the best interest of the County. The County may accept any item or group of items on any bid unless the offeror qualifies his bid by specific limitations. D3. Right to Reject: The County reserves the right to reject any or aii bids, with or without cause, wilhout recourse, to waive technicalities or to accept the bid which in its judgement best serves the interest of the County. Cost of submittal of this bid is considered an operational cost of the bidder and shaii not be passed on to or be borne by the County. Osceola County also reserves the right to reject the bid of a bidder who has previously failed to perform properly or complete on time contracts of a similar nature, or who investigation shows is not in a position to perform the contract. D4. Bid Results: The bid tabulation sheet should be available within 48 hours of the bid opening date and can be read from the Osceola County homepage at ''http://www.osceola.org''. If you do not have access to the Internet, you may contact DemandStar by Onvia at (800) 711-1712 for the results. D5. Best Prices: Award wiii be made without further negotiation based upon competitive bids, therefore your best price should be submitted in response to this invitation to bid. D6. Reasonable Prices: A reasonable unit price must be submitled for each work element. In the event lhat any pay item unit price is determined to be unreasonably low or unreasonably high, the bid may be declared non- responsive and may not be considered, D7. Local Vendor Preference: According to Osceola County Administrative Code, Chapter 3, Section 3.09, aii local vendors will be given a three (3%) percent preference in bid prices. A local vendor is defined as a Page 8 of 16 "" ...." Bid No. NR#03·368·BC Due Date: September 16, 2003 @ 2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31, 2003 D.m. Buyer: Barb Carter Respond to: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq" Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar5ía)osceola,oro FL 34741 Phone: 407/343·3132 Fax: 407/343·3130 Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals vendor who has an office or branch within the boundaries of Osceola County and has a current Osceola County Occupational License, Three percent will be deducted from the local vendor's price for comparison purposes only. DB. Drug-Free Workplace Preference: Whenever two or more bids which are equal with respect to price, quality, delivery and services are received for procurement subject to the Osceola County Administrative Code, a bid received from a business that certifies that it has implemented a drug-free workplace program (Atlachment B) shall be given preference, in accordance with Florida State Statute 28ì.087. Certification of an implemented drug-free workplace program must be included with the bid when the bid is submitled. Further information regarding the Florida Statute is available in the Osceola County Procurement Services Office, (407) 343-3125. D9. Determining Responsibility: In determining responsibility, the following qualifications will be considered: a. The bidder's ability, capacity and skill to peliorm the contract or provide the service within the time specified. b. The reputation, judgment and experience of the bidder. c. The quality of peliormance of previous contracts or services including previous peliormance wilh the County. d, Previous and existing compliance by the bidder with laws and ordinances relating to lhe contract or service. e. Financial resources of the bidder to peliorm the contract pr provide the service. f, Ability to provide future maintenance and service for the use of the subject of the contract. g. Whether the bidder is in arrears to the County on a debt or contract or is a defaulter on surety to the County, or whether the bidder's taxes or assessments are delinquent. D10. Actual Damages: The Contractor shall be held fully and solely liable for any and all damages, losses, and expenses caused by the errors, omissions, negligence, or delay(s) of the Contractor, his employees, agents, or sub-contractors(s) engaged by the Contractor to peliorm the Work required hereby. The COUNTY shall be held harmless to the fullest extent of the law for any damages incurred by the Contractor on a third party during the Contractor's peliormance of the work furnishing and services, and provision of materials pursuanl to the requirements of this bid and or any resulting Agreement, and for any and all damages, losses and expenses to the COUNTY arising out of the Cpntractor's peliormance of any of its obligations contained in this bid. The COUNTY will pursue all actual damages due using all legal measures available. D11. Submittal Cost. Cost of submitlal of this bid is considered an operational cost of the bidder and shall not be passed on to or be borne by the County. SECTION E TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS E1. Scope of Work: This bid is for the purchase and delivery of mosquito control chemicals for the Osceola County Mosquito Control Department. E2. Brands: Osceola County is requesting that ONLY the products specified on the Bid Price Sheet be bid under this solicitation. Alternative manufactured products shall not be accepted. E3. Delivery: Delivery shall be made within five (5) business days of order placement. Failure to peliorm within delivery deadline(s) set forth in the specifications or any other contract document shall constitute default. Delivery may be a factor in the award of this bid, E4. Minimum Order: There shall be no minimum order dollar amount on any order placed by Osceola County, E5. Order Shortages: Vendor is required to provide nollce of any and all shortages at the time the order is placed. Failure to do so could result in termination of contract. Notification must be made to lhe ordering departmenl so that allernale methods of oblaining necessary supplies can be initiated. Page 9 of 16 Bid No, NR#03·368-BC Due Date: September 16, 2003 @ 2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31,2003 D,m, Buyer: Barb Carter Respond to: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq., Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar5iã)osceola,ora FL 34741 Phone: 407/343·3132 Fax: 407/343·3130 Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals '-' ...., E6. Discount Off Balance of Product Line: At the end of the Bid Price Schedule piease state the discount off list price offered for balance of product line for items not inciuded In this solicitation. E7. Warranty: The bidder shail provide a one (1) year warranty against defective workmanship and materials for all products. Upon notification, the vendor shail replace defective products within ten (10) business days at no additional cost to the County. Ea. Chemical Requirements: 1. Ail chemicals must be approved for use in State of Florida. 2, Chemicals listed for bid are the items to be supplied, no substitutes are permilted. 3. Permethin and Oils shail be delivered together. 4. MSDS Sheets must be supplied with each chemical. Page 10 of 16 Bid No. AlR#03·368·BC Due Date: September 16, 2003 @ 2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31,2003 a.m. Buyer: Barb Carter Respond to: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq" Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar511ùosceola, oro FL 34741 Phone: 407/343·3132 Fax: 407/343-3130 Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals \.. ,...", F. BID PRICE SHEET In accordance with the terms, conditions, and specifications, the following prices are offered to Osceola County for AlR#03·368- BC, Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals: Item Est. Description Chemical Unit Price Total Price Annual Container Size Qntv LOT 1 - ADUL TICIDING CHEMICALS 1. 10jugs Anvil 2+2 ULV 2.5 gallon jug $ $ -oer iua 2. 1 drum Anvil 2+2 ULV 30 gallon drum $ $ ner drum 3. 1 drum Anvil 2+2 ULV 55 gallon drum $ $ oer drum 4, 44jugs Anvil 10+10 2.5 gallon jug $ $ periua 5. 1 drum Anvil 10+10 30 gallon drum $ $ oer drum 6. 1 drum Anvil 10+10 55 gallon drum $ $ Der drum 7, 4 drums Aqua Reslin Permethin Mix with Water 55 gallon drum $ $ oer drum 8. 18 drum Baytex 50 gallon drum $ $ (approx. ) Der drum 9. 25 drums Mineral OillULV Oil/Orchex Oil/BVA Oil 55 gallon drum $ $ ner drum 10. 10jugs Mosquito Mist One ULV 2.5 gallon jug $ $ periua 11, 1 drum Mosquito Mist One ULV 30 gallon drum $ $ ner drum 12. 1 drum Mosquito Mist One UL V 55 gallon drum $ $ per drum 13. 10jugs Mosquito Mist Two UL V 2.5 gal ion jug $ $ per lua 14, 1 drum Mosquito MistTwo ULV 55 gallon drum $ $ oer drum 15. 10jugs Permanone/Synergised Permethin, 2.5 gallon jug $ $ Permanone 31·66 or Biomist 31-66 per jug loroduct name) 16, 5 pails Permanone/Synergised Permethin, 5 gallon pail $ $ Permanone 31·66 or Biomist 31-66 per pail I Inroduct name) n. 5 drums Permanone/Synergised Permethin, 30 gallon drum $ $ Permanone 31-66 or Biomist 31·66 per drum (product name) Page 11 of 16 Bid No, AlR#03·368·BC Due Date: September 16, 2003 @ 2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31, 2003 p,m. Buyer: Barb Carter Respond to: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq., Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar5@osceola.ora FL 34741 Phone: 407/343·3132 Fax: 407/343·3130 Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals 18. 5 drums Permanone/Synergised Permethin, 50 gallon drum $ $ Permanone 31-66 or Biomist 31-66 per drum (oroduct name) 19. 8jugs Permanone/Synergised Permethin, 2.5 gallon jug $ $ Permanone 10% EC or Flit 10 EC per jug (product name) 20. 17 drums Scourge 55 gallon drum $ $ oer drum 21. 10jugs Pyrenone 25-5 or Pyrocide 25-5 2.5 gallon jug $ $ per jug I (product name) 22. 5 pails Pyrenone 25-5 or Pyrocide 25·5 5 gallon pail $ $ per pail (product name 23. 4 drums Pyre none 25-5 or Pyrocide 25-5 30 gallon drum $ $ per drum (product name) 24. 2 drums Pyrenone 25-5 or Pyrocide 25-5 55 gallon drum $ $ per drum (product name) Lot 1 Total: $ Item Est. Description '.' , Chemical Unit Price . . Total Pri.ce Annual ' Contailler Si~e Qntv ' '., . LOT 2 . LARVICIDING CHEMICALS 1. 1 jug Abate 5% Pellets 22 lb. jug $ $ Der iua 2. 1 bag Abate 2% BG 251b. bag $ $ per baa 3, 1 case Altosid Larvicide, 30 Day Briquets 400 briquets $ $ /cs per case 4. 250 bags. BTI Granules Vectobac G or Aquabac 40 lb. bag $ $ 5/8 Mesh per bag I (product name) 5. 250 bags BTI Granules Vectobac CG or Aquabac 40 lb. bag $ $ 10/14 Mesh per bag . (product name) 6. 120 BTI Bactimos Briquets 100 $ $ boxes briauets/box per box ì, 1 drum Golden Bear Liquid Larvicide 55 gallon drum $ $ per drum '-' "WI Page 12 of 16 Bid No. NR#03·368·BC Due Date: September 16, 2003 @ 2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31, 2003 D.m. Buyer: Barb Carter Respond to: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq., Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar5@osceola,ora FL 34741 Phone: 407/343·3132 Fax: 407/343·3130 Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals 8. 1 bucket LarvX SG Granulated Larvicide 40 Ib, bucket $ $ -Der bucket 9. 4jugs Vectobac 12AS Liquid Larvicide or 2.5 gallon jug $ $ Aquabac XT Liquid Larvicide per jug (Droducl name) 10. 250 bags Vectolex CG 40 lb. bag $ $ Der baq Lot 2 Total: $ Percentage discount offered off balance of product line for items not specified on price % sheet: Prompt Payment Discount: - % _days Is vendor willing to serve as a secondary supplier if the primary cannot provide - YES - NO nroduct? LOT 1 GRAND TOTAL: $ LOT 2 GRAND TOTAL: $ \... ...,,; To the Bidder's Procurement Director: By my signature below I/We the undersigned certify that this Bid is genuine, not a sham or collusive or made in behalf of another person, firm or corporation not herein named and that the undersigned has not directly or indirectly induced or solicited any other bidder to submit a sham bid or any other person, firm or corporation to refrain from bidding and that the undersigned has not in any manner sought collusion to secure himself an advantage over any other bidder, By submittal of this bid the undersigned agrees to abide by all terms and conditions set forth herein including but not limited to the specifications, bid security, prompt contracting and timely delivery of the services andlor equipment to be procured hereby, Signature of Authorized Representative: Printed Name: Title: I Date: ACKNOWLEDGMENT IS HEREBY MADE OF RECEIPT OF ADDENDA ISSUED DURING THE SOLICITATION PERIOD: ADDENDUM # THROUGH ADDENDUM # Vendor Witness: Date: Page 13 of 16 Bid No. NR#03·368·BC Due Date: September 16, 2003 @ 2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31, 2003 n.m. Buyer: Barb Carter Respond to: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq., Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar5@osceola,orn FL 34741 Phone: 407/343·3132 Fax: 407/343·3130 Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals \... ...., ATTACHMENT A STATEMENT OF "NO BID" If you do not intent to bid on this requirement, please compiete and return this form prior to the date shown for receipt of bids to the Osceola County Procurement Services Department, 1 Courthouse Square, Suite 1200, Kissimmee, FL 34741. We have declined to bid on NR#03-368-BC. Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals, for the following reasons: Specifications are too "restrictive". i.e. geared toward one toward one brand or manufacturer (please explain below) Insufficient time to respond to Invitation to Bid We do not offer this product or equivalent Our product schedule would not permit us to perform Unable to meet specifications Unable to meet bond requirements Specifications unclear (please explain below) Other (please specify below). Remarks: We understand that if the "No Bid" letter is not executed and returned, our name may be deleted from the list of qualified bidders for Osceola County Board of Counly Commissioners for future projects. Typed Name and Title Company Name Address Signature and Title Telephone Number Date Page 14 of 16 Bid No, AlR#03-368·BC Due Date: September 16, 2003 @ 2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31,2003 a.m. Buyer: Barb Carter Respond to: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq" Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar5tã!osceola,orn FL 34741 Phone: 407/343·3132 Fax: 407/343-3130 Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals .... '" ATTACHMENT B DRUG FREE WORKPLACE CERTIFICATION In case of tie bids, preference must be given to vendors submitting a certification with their bid! proposal certifying they have a drug-free workplace in accordance with Section 287.087, Florida Statutes. The drug·free certification form below must be signed and returned with your bid. In order to have a drug-free workplace program, a business shall: (1) Publish a slatement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession, or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violations of such prohibition. (2) Inform employees about the dangers of drug abuse in the workplace, the business' policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace, any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs, and the penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations. (3) Give each employee engaged in providing the commodities or contractual services lhat are under bid a copy of the slatement specified in the first paragraph. (4) In the statement specified in the first paragraph, notify the employees that, as a condition of working on the commodities or contractual services that are under bid, the employee will abide by the terms of the statement and will notify the employer of any conviction of, or plea of guiity or nolo contendere to, any violation of chapter 893 or of any controlled substance law of the United States or any state, for a vioiation occurring in the workplace no later than five (5) days after such conviction. (5) Impose a sanction on, or require the satisfactory participation in a drug abuse assistance or rehabililation program if such is available in the employee's community, by any employee who is so convicted. (6) Make a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of this section. As the person authorized to sign the statement, I certify that this firm complies fully with the above requirements. Vendor's Signature, Title, Date STATE OF COUNTY OF PERSONALLY APPEARED BEFORE ME, the undersigned authority who, after being first sworn by me, affixed his/her signature in the space provided above on this day of ,20 _Personally known Produced I.D Notary Public Page 15 of 16 Bid No, NR#03·368·BC Due Date: September 16, 2003 @ 2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31,2003 p.m. Buyer: Barb Carter Respond to: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq., Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar5@osceoia.orQ FL 34741 Phone: 407/343-3132 Fax: 407/343·3130 Bid Titie: Rebid of Mosquito Controi Chemicals "" 'tJ' ATTACHMENT C EXPERIENCE OF BIDDER The following questionnaire shall be answered by the bidder for use in evaluating the bid to determine the lowest and best bid meeting the specifications outlines. 1. FIRM NAME: Address: City/State/Zip: Phone: Fax: Name of primary contact responsible for work performance: Phone: Cell Phone: Name of alternate contact should primary not be available: Phone: Cell Phone: 2. INSURANCE: Surety Company: Agent Company: Agent Contact: Total Bonding Capacity:$ Phone: N/A to this bid Value of Work Presently Bonded: N/A to this bid 3. EXPERIENCE: Years in business: Years in business under this name: Years performing this type of work: Value of work now under contract: Value of work in place last year: Percentage (%) of work usually self-performed: Name of subcontractors you may use: Has firm: Failed to complete a contract: Been involved in bankruptcy or reorganization: Pending judgement claims or suits against firm: 4. PERSONNEL: How many people does your company employee? Management Site Supervisors Labor Clerical Other _Full time _Full time _Full time _Full time _Full time _Part time _Part time _Part time _Part time _Part time 5. WORK EXPERIENCE: List your three (3) most significant commercial projects where the contract was similar in scope and size to this bid: Reference #1 : Company/Agency Name: Add ress: Contact Person: Phone: Project Description: Contract $ Amount: Fax: Date Completed: Page 16 of 16 Bid No, AlR#03-368·BC Due Date: September 16, 2003 @ 2:00 I Advertised Date: August 31, 2003 D.m. Buyer: Barb Carter Respond to: Procurement Services, 1 Courthouse Sq., Suite 1200, Kissimmee, Bcar5({j)osceola.oro FL 34741 Phone: 407/343·3132 Fax: 407/343·3130 Bid Title: Rebid of Mosquito Control Chemicals '-' ..", Reference #2: Company/Agency Name: Address: Contact Person: Phone: Project Description: Contract $ Amount: Fax: Date Completed: Reference #3: Company/Agency Name: Address: Contact Person: Phone: Project Description: Contract $ Amount: Fax: Date Completed: PLEASE COMPLETE AND SUBMIT WITH BID »»Failure to submit this form with your bid may disqualify your response.«« Page 17 of 16